l|ip| ii Ijiini m ! II I I III mam I 1 \m mm ! ill . mfHu ! M il l I 111 I !l ll. I I M'il"i H ll' ^\ • r.'ilrl iiiiliiiii mmw M. IIIIIHII ^7 137' 6/c A HISTORY OF ecclesiastical 8rci)itecture IN ENGLAND. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 http://archive.org/details/historyofecclesiOOpool A HISTORY OF €cclestasttcal architecture IN ENGLAND. GEO. AYLIFFE POOLE, M.A., VICAR OF WELFORD. LONDON : JOSEPH MASTERS, ALDERSGATE STREET, AND 78, NEW BOND STREET. MDCCCXLVIII. LONDON : PRINTED BY JOSEFH MASTERS, ALDERS GATE STREET. RIGHT REVEREND FATHER IN GOD, RICHARD, BY DIVINE PERMISSION, LORD BISHOP OF BATH AND WELLS, Cftts Volume IS RESPECTFULLY AND GRATEFULLY INSCRIBED. PREFACE. The author has endeavoured in this volume, to combine a gene- ral history of the greater English ecclesiastical architects of the middle ages, with an equally general view of their works, and of the characters which distinguish the buildings of their respec- tive ages : and he hopes that the result of a plan thus loosely didactic, may be to excite some additional interest in the mas- ters of a great art in its highest application, and a more vivid, as well as a more just perception of the merits of their works. He is aware that his work is very far from what it ought to be. Incomplete it is necessarily ; it will probably be considered meagre : should it even be taken as a mere melange of ecclesiolo- gical notes, he will be satisfied with the estimate, if only it ob- tain the praise of being real as far as it goes. That it may deserve this praise at least, the monkish histo- rians, the only coeval sources of information, are left to speak for themselves on such subjects as miracles, doctrines, and counsels of perfection, when they are connected with church building. We neither do nor can think, believe, and feel with them ourselves, and we should deprecate nothing more seriously than a use of their works which should lead others to an indis- criminate reception of their facts, or of their theology. Still it must be remembered, that the opinions which they express, the feelings which they avow, even the stories which they relate, whether they be or be not real and true in themselves, or in our judgment, are clearly so in the philosophy of the history of art. It is not the truth of an opinion, or the view which we take of it ; but it is the view which he took of it, which influenced Vlll PREFACE. Aylwin in the building of Ramsey Abbey. It is not our estimate of their character, or our way of expressing it, but it is their estimate, and their way of expressing it, which indicate the de- gree in which their contemporaries were influenced by such men as Wolstan, and John of Wisbeach. It is impossible to write on such subjects without a moral tone, though direct moralizing may be avoided ; unless indeed one can divest oneself of the feeling that they have a moral, and this is a power which the author by no means covets. He feels that the moral here is a wholesome one. Every instance in which we are brought into connection with those to whom we owe our very existence as individuals, and as a nation, ought to make us feel our fellowship rather than our distance, and to teach us a proper estimate of ourselves and of our fathers. If there are many things which tend to lessen the influence even of our common Christianity in making us one with them, it will be useful to view them as engaged in a work, of which we in- herit the advantages : and if we are superior, as we are and ought to be, to our remote ancestors, in many things, — in the arts of life, in habits of society, in soundness of objective faith ; and if we are quite as conscious of this as is consistent with charity and humility, it may be a wholesome exercise for us to pursue a study which will present them to us as unquestionably our superiors in one branch of the arts, and in one of the fruits of true religion. CONTENTS. CHAPTER I. The Anglo-Roman Period. PAGE Preliminary Remarks. — Wooden Church at Glastonbury. — Proportions of this Church followed in Ireland.— King Lucius. — The Dioclesian Per- secution. — The Martyrdom and Church of S. Alban. — Churches restored after the Persecution. — Influence of Roman Sway on British Ecclesiastical Art 1 CHAPTER II. The Mythical Period. Desertion of Britain by the Romans. — Destruction of Churches by the Barbarians. — Ambrosius Aurelianus restores Churches. — Use of Myths and Legends as affording materials for History. — Merlin and Vortigern. — Blood used in the foundation of Buildings. — Alexander, Bishop of Lincoln. — Merlin and Ambrosius Aurelianus. — Stonehenge. — The triumph of Art over Strength. — King Arthur restores Churches. — The splendour of his Coronation 14 CHAPTER III. The Saxon Period. . From the coming of Augustine to the birth of Dunstan, Arrival of Augustine, and his Establishment at Canterbury. — He reconciles Heathen Temples, and founds a Monastery and the Cathedral Church. — Mission of Paulinus to Northumbria. — A Baptistery of Wood erected at York, and afterwards surrounded with a Stone Church. — Other Churches erected by Paulinus, especially at Campodonum, and Lin- coln. — Columba and Iona. — Oswald and Lindisfarne ; Finan's Cathe- X CONTENTS. dral there. — Cedd and Lastingham. — Cuthbert and Fame. — Mr. Petrie on the Origin and Uses of Round Towers in Ireland. — Other Monas- teries and their Founders. — Benedict Biscop, and Wearmouth and Jarrow. — Of Building more Romano. — Wilfrid and Hexham, from Eddius, and Richard of Hexham 25 CHAPTER IV. The Saxon Period. From the Birth of Dunstan to Edward the Confessor. Dunstan introduces the Benedictine Rule into England, and rebuilds Glas- tonbury with increased splendour. — Oswald, Bishop of Worcester. — Ramsey Abbey, and Worcester. — Adhelm, Founder of Malmsbury Abbey. — Miracles connected with the erection of Churches. — Restora- tion of Churches after Danish Invasion. — Croyland, Kirkdale 48 CHAPTER V. The Saxon Period. General Review of Ecclesiastical Architecture in the Saxon era : Brixworth, Greensted. — Circumstances which continued to affect Churches and their Structure in after ages. — Monachism. — The Division of England into Parishes : — The Introduction of Glass : — The use of Lead for Roofs : — Accumulation of Wealth in precious Vestments and Orna- ments : — Church Music : — The Organ : — Bells : — Dials and Clocks : — The Bell-tower. — Burial in Churches 66 CHAPTER VI. The Norman Period. Introduction of the Norman Style. — Edward the Confessor and Westminster Abbey. — Harold and Waltham Abbey. — William the Conqueror and Battle Abbey. — Gundulf, Bishop of Rochester. — Wulstau, Bishop of Worcester. — Three Duads of Ecclesiastical Builders. — Robert and Hubert Losing : — Walkelyn and his brother Simeon : — Roger and his nephew Alexander. — The Freemasons 90 CHAPTER VII. The Norman Period. S. Alban's. — The use of Brick. — Tewkesbury, Peterborough, Bury S. Edmund's, S. Paul's, S. Cross, Romsey, Rydal, Fountains, Faversham, Castor, Durham, and Bolton. — Destruction of Churches. — Worcester, Chichester, York, Bath, Fountains. — Violence of the times. — Number of Churches. — Their general character. — Norman Decorations 120 CONTENTS. xi CHAPTER VIII. The Transition from Norman to Early English. PAGE The Burning of Canterbury Cathedral. — The Restoration by William of Sens and William the Englishman. — The older and newer fabrics com- pared. — Introduction of the Pointed Arch and its results. — Influence of the Patron Saint on the fabric of the Church 155 CHAPTER IX. The Symbolism of Ecclesiastical Architecture. Necessity of treating the subject, — Early Instances of Symbolism. — Round Church at Fulda. — Dream of the Monk of Bury. — Authority of Durandus. — His Rationale. — Definition of Symbolism. — The Definition applied to various instances. — Saxon Symbolism. — Norman. — Subse- quent Styles. — Symbolism still existing 170 CHAPTER X. The Round Churches in England. General History of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre at Jerusalem. — S. Sepulchre's, Cambridge : — S. Sepulchre's, Northampton. — The Tem- ple.— Little Maplested 190 CHAPTER XI. The Connection of Heraldry with Ecclesiastical Architecture. Synchronisms and parallel fate of Heraldry and Gothic Architecture. — Augmentations illustrated from several events. — Dates of Buildings determined by Heraldry. — Architectural charges, especially the Chev- ron. — Heraldic Decorations of Buildings. — Community of feeling be- tween Heraldry and Christian Art : The Religious element in both . . 200 CHAPTER XII. The Early English Period. Great Exertions of Church Builders in the Thirteenth Century. — The Temple. — Fountains, Kirkstall, Buildwas, Winchester, S. Alban's, Glasgow, Beaulieu, York, Skelton, Ely, Durham, Rochester, Beverley, Ripon, Southwell. — Ely : Bishop Ridal, and the introduction of Western Transepts : — Eustachius and the Galilee : — Bishop Norwold and the Presbytery. — Wells: Bishop Jocelin. — Salisbury: Bishop Poore. — Old and New Sarum compared. — Nine Altars of Durham. — Extreme East Transepts. — Westminster Abbey. — Characteristics of Early English. — Destruction of Churches by violence : Rochester, Norwich 211 xii CONTENTS. CHAPTER XIII. The Period of Geometric Tracery. PAGE Confusion of arrangement in Ecclesiological Works. — Introduction of Tracery ; its first development in Geometric Forms, coetaneous with the Early English for a long time, and with the Decorated Style on its First Appearance. — Of Cusping and Tracery in general. — Of Panelling. — Results of the Introduction of Tracery. — Chapter- House of York. — Merton College Chapel. — Ripon Minster. — Exeter Cathedral. — Lincoln Cathedral. — Wells Lady Chapel and Chapter- House. — Temple-Balsall. — *' Architectural Parallels." — Tintern. — Guisborough. — Vale-Royal Abbey. — Queen Eleanor's Crosses 237 CHAPTER XIV. Sculpture and Carving, as Decorations of Ecclesiastical Architecture. General character of Norman Sculpture : The Fonts of East Meon, and of Lenton ; the Doorways of Rochester and of Malmsbury. — Early Eng- lish Sculpture. — Doorway of Higham Ferrers. — Introduction of " alto relievo." — West front of Wells. — Effigies of Henry III. and of Queen Eleanor. — Monuments of Robert Vere, of Aymer de Valence, and of Edward II. — Lord Lindsay on the Sculpture of this Age. — Screen in Edward the Confessor's Chapel. — Effigies of Henry VII., and of Eliza- beth his Queen. — Introduction of the Pagan Element. — All grace and all religious feeling lost in the Reign of Elizabeth. — Monument of Sir Christopher Hatton. — The Pagan Element again introduced, without any compensation, after the Revolution. — Tombs of Earl Stanhope, of General Fleming, and of Dr. Hales. — Comparison of the Monu- ments of General Wolfe, and of Aymer de Valence. — Sepulchral Crosses at Jervaulx, at Tickhill, and at Laughton-en-le-Morthen. — Other Carved Tombs. — Brasses. — John Bloxham, at Great Addington ; a Priest at Wensley ; the Parents of Archbishop Chichele. — Dean Eyre ; Robert Brannel ; John Selwyn. — Wood Carving. — Early Speci- mens ; most used in the Fifteenth Century. — Grinling Gibbons. — Stalls at Wensley, and at S.Nicholas, Lynn. — Grotesques 253 CHAPTER XV. Painting, Mosaic, and Glass Painting, as Decorations of Ecclesi- astical Architecture. Colour universally employed. — First recorded Introduction of Pictures. — Augustine, Benedict Biscop, Wilfrid. — S. Dunstan. — Skill of the Saxons in the Decorative Arts. — Instances of Early Norman Painting. — Oil Painting in the tenth century, in the thirteenth and fourteenth centu- ries. — S. Stephen's, Westminster. — Ely Cathedral. — MS. account of CONTENTS. xiii Abbot Islip's Funeral. — Lord Lindsay's estimate of the Mural Paintings of our Churches. — Subjects generally treated. — Two examples from Old S. Paul's. — Bishop Sherburn's Painting at Chichester. — The present usage of the Church of England. — Mosaic derived from Greece, through the Roman Empire to the Church. — Richard de Ware, Abbot of Westminster. — Prior Crowden's Chapel at Ely. — Difference of Treatment in Roman and English Mosaic. — Painted Glass. — Its Influ- ence on Architectural Forms. — Early examples ; Canterbury, Win- chester, York, Ludlow, S. Neot's, Peterborough, Dorchester, Tickhill, West Wickham. — Memorial Windows 278 CHAPTER XVI. The Decorated Period. Universal adoption of flowing and indirect lines. — Other Characteristics of the Decorated Style. — Exeter Cathedral. — York Minster. — Hull. — Hedon. — Patrington. — Carlisle. — Durham. — Boston. — Grantham. — Heckington. — Norbury. — Chesterfield. — Finedon.— Frequent poverty of execution. — Stanford. — Bridge Chapels. — Wakefield. — Chapel of S. William, York. — Wayside Chapel at Houghton-in-the-Dale. — Ely Cathedral. — Fall of the Tower, and foundation of the Octagon by Alan of Walsingham. — The constructive character, and the general ef- fect of this work. — Bishop Hotham and the Presbytery. — The Lady Chapel, John of Wisbeach. — Sequel of the Life of Alan of Walsing- ham 313 Appendix. — Extract from . fabric roll of Ely Cathedral 339 CHAPTER XVII. The Perpendicular Period. Interest of Transition Period. — The Nave of Winchester ; Edington and Wykeham.— Gloucester, Norwich, Principles of Restoration ; Win- chester, Canterbury, York, Gloucester, Crowland, Tickhill, Durham, Kirkstall. — Clerestories. — Towers and Spires ; Salisbury, Norwich, Coventry, Whittlesea, Rushden, Shrewsbury, Laughton-en-le-Mor- then, Chester-le- Street, Louth, Newcastle, Fotheringay, Lowick, Boston, Howden, Derby, Evesham, Norwich, Gloucester, Glaston- bury, Bristol, Taunton, North Petherton, Titchmarsh. — Uses of Towers : — Beacons and Landmarks ; Whittlesea, Raunds, the Lantern of Arden, Coventry, Dundry, York, Hadleigh. — Defence : — Melsonby, Middleham, Spennithorne, Bedale : Irthlingborough, Stanwick, Ten- terden 341 Appendix. — Extracts from the account for building Louth Broach 360 XIV CONTENTS. CHAPTER XVIII. The Perpendicular Period. page Archbishop Chichele : Higham-Ferrers, the College and Bede-House ; S. Barnard's, Oxford ; the Lollard's Tower, Lambeth. — Bishop Skirlaw : Skirlaw Chapel ; the Tower of York ; the Tower and Chapter-House of Howden; Skirlaw's Burial and Tomb. — Sepulchral Chapels : Bishop Wainfleet : Cardinal Beaufort ; Bishops Alcock and West ; William Comynge and S. Mary Redcliff. — William Greville, and Campden Church. — Anthony Catesby and Isabella his Wife, and Whiston Church. — S. Michael's-le-Belfry, York. — Deterioration in Architectural Cha- racter. — The Tudor Style ; Chapel of Henry VII. in Westminster Abbey 367 Appendix. — I. Contract for the building of the Dormitory at Durham 383 II. Agreement for the building of Catterick Church, Yorkshire 385 III. Document relating to the decorations of the Beauchamp chapel, in S. Mary's church, Warwick 386 IV. On the erection of Coventry Cross 391 CHAPTER XIX. The Post-Reformation Period. Deterioration in Ecclesiastical Art not to be referred to the Reformation. — Destruction and Spoliation of Churches. — The Curse upon Sacrilege. Materials of Churches used to much hurt and little gain. — Different spirit of Sacrilege at the Reformation, and at the Rebellion. — Puritan Destruction. — The Journal of Will Dowsing. — Desolation of Lichfield, of Scarborough, of Astley. — Restoration of Lichfield, of Stanton Harold. — The Fire of London. — Sir Christopher Wren, and the total extinction of Gothic Architecture 392 Appendix. — I. A contemporary narrative of the burning of S. Paul's steeple, in 1561 406 II. Sir Christopher Wren's account of the state of S. Paul's Cathedral, after the fire of London, 1666 410 III. Extracts from Sir Christopher Wren's letter on the state of Westminster Abbey 413 A HISTORY OF ecclesiastical Architecture IN ENGLAND. CHAPTER I. The Anglo-Roman Period. Preliminary Remarks. — Wooden Church at Glastonbury. — Pro- portions of this Church followed tn Ireland. — King Lucius. — The Dioclesian Persecution. — The Martyrdom and Church of S. Alban. — Churches restored after the Persecution. — Influence of Roman Sway on British Ecclesiastical Art. There is something very remarkable in the number and beauty of ecclesiastical edifices in this and other portions of western Christendom, possessing a character by which they are collected into one class, however different they may be in magnitude, or in details and accidental varieties of arrangement. It is still more remarkable, that these structures, so numerous, and combining within themselves so many elements of beauty, are the work of less than five centuries, 1 and those not the most competent, as we should judge a priori, to design and complete a series of works, at the same time great and beautiful, requiring a disciplined, as well as a bold conception, and for their completion great mechanical and scientific acquirements. 1 In Germany, however, with Nor- century before it had been embodied mandy and other parts of France, the in such churches as Durham and style now called Norman had attained Tewkesbury in England, some degree of perfection, at least a B 2 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Until the twelfth century our forefathers were but slowly feeling their way towards the perfection of ecclesiastical architecture, and after the fifteenth there was not a single additional form or character of beauty added to the resources of the ecclesiastical architect. From this time a people comparatively civilized in other things, became so tasteless as to depreciate, so barbarous as to destroy the stately monuments of primeval art, or to strip them of all their loveliness ; and the sixteenth century left but the wreck of many of the most stately ecclesiastical fabrics, and those which remained mourned, and still mourn as a bride with- out her jewels. At length, indeed, we have become sensible of the beauties which our fathers despised, ravaged and destroyed. For a while we wondered at the mighty structures, and were impressed with a sort of vague feeling that it was beyond our physical and constructive powers to build the like. Now we pay a deeper and a truer homage, in confessing that there is some- thing almost incommunicable, or which at least we cannot catch, in the soul which informs those lovely structures. We confess, though unwillingly, our inability to match them either in their vastness, or in their beauty : in their vastness, for want of devo- tion or of wealth 3 in their beauty, for want of refined taste, and principles of harmonious composition. Yet wherein are our resources inferior to those of our ancestors of the thirteenth or fourteenth centuries? In the wealth both of the individual and of the community we are greatly superior to them ; not only as wealth is counted in gold and silver, but as it represents the means of commanding elegance and splendour, and of executing vast national works. In general taste and refinement we are be- yond all comparison their superiors. Our science and our applica- tions of science to mechanical arts, would surprise the philosopher or the mechanician of the thirteenth century, as much as their advancement in architecture shames us : yet for so many hun- dred years our ancestors did always, what we, in about as many, have always failed to do. In short, and this is the great re- proach, in everything else, even in every other application of architecture, — in our mansions, our palaces, our bridges, our public works, our courts and exchanges, our public streets, our docks, our piers, our beacons, — we surpass our forefathers ; but in our religious edifices we are far beneath them : and, as if by THE ANGLO-ROMAN PERIOD. 3 a necessity against which we cannot struggle, we are kept beneath them. They dwelt in hovels, and worshipped in houses exceeding magnifical ; we dwell in cedar, and worship in meagre or dilapidated churches. We must guard, however, at the outset against a notion that the decline of ecclesiastical architecture is to be traced to the Reformation. Many beautiful structures were indeed destroyed at the dissolution of the monasteries, but this was no part of the Reformation properly so called : it preceded, and did not follow the establishment of a reformed ritual ; and it was the work of a prince in all doctrinal matters as popish as any of his prede- cessors. Nor was Henry VIII. the first to devise or to execute this wholesale sacrilege. The alien priories had been already seized several times, and at last wholly confiscated by Henry V. (a.d. 1414.) Wolsey had dissolved and despoiled religious houses to found his own college, nine years before the dissolution of the lesser, and thirteen years before that of the greater mo- nasteries. But it is still more to the purpose that both here and abroad the decline of ecclesiastical art, in all its branches, had preceded the Reformation : that architecture was debased, and partially paganized, all over the continent, as well as in England, before the quarrel of Henry VIII. with the Pope ; and of course long before the Reformation had taken any definite form. Moreover the downward course of ecclesiastical architec- ture has been at least as rapid in other countries as in our own. New churches have been as wretched, — old ones have been as injudiciously restored, and as recklessly and more universally destroyed; nay, wholesale sacrilege and the dissolution of reli- gious houses have been practised without any connection with a change in doctrine. And, finally, the present revival of eccle- siastical art commenced in Protestant England, and among Anglo-Catholics; and we heartily hope that it may yet grow into a living proof, that we are not deserted by the spirit of our fathers, in all that is great and lovely. The decline of our ecclesiastical architecture was rapid, and its extinction instantaneous : its growth had been slow and gra- dual, and its vigour of long continuance. It is true that the number of Saxon churches and monasteries was very great, and that in some cases they could boast a dignity and an appropriate- B 2 4 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. ness to the solemn use for which they were designed, beyond that of any other buildings of their time. Yet it must be con- fessed that there was scarcely a single edifice which could com- pare in grace of conception and beauty of detail, with those with which the Normans were familiar at their first coming into England. But it must be remembered that we ought not to compare the Saxon churches with the works of another age or another people, to which they may or may not have been immen- surably superior or hopelessly inferior, but with the secular works of the same age and nation. It may fairly admit a doubt, however, how soon the greatest efforts were directed to religious works in England. Christianity came into the island with the Romans ; not, however, as a recognized part of a system, but in the person of a few dependants of the proconsular court, and a few soldiers in stipendiary legions. The new occupants of a conquered and barbarous island, were employed first in necessary military works, and next in the erection of theatres, halls, and basilicas : tokens of their luxury and authority, not of their piety. They erected here and there an altar to Venus or to Mercury ; but a temple perhaps worthy of the name nowhere. The Chris- tians among them would scarcely aspire to the possession of more than a little oratory, like a lodge in the wilderness, be- tokening the low condition, and the uncertain tenure, of military colonists : and the few who came or remained as missionaries, would be as unable as the rest were unwilling, to erect costly temples, until their preaching had already produced its effect on whole tribes of the aboriginal inhabitants. The history of those times, whether legendary or authentic, confirms the natural deduction. The first Christian temple in England, as all accounts agree, was that at Glastonbury ; and there is an equal consent in the tradition that it was of very humble materials, and of very rude construction. As this church in its progressive splendour often occurs in the history of Christian art, I will transcribe the account which William of Malmsbury gives of its erection. Having related how Joseph of Arimathea was appointed by Philip, at the persecution which followed the death of Stephen, to preach the gospel in this island, with eleven companions, he adds, — " These holy missionaries coming into Britain in the year of THE ANGLO-ROMAN PERIOD. 5 our Lord 63, and in the fifteenth of the Blessed Virgin's as- sumption, published the doctrine of Christ with great industry and courage. But the barbarous king and his subjects, being- somewhat alarmed at so unusual an undertaking, and not relish- ing a persuasion so different from his own, refused to become a proselyte ; but in consideration of the length of their voyage, and being somewhat charmed with their unexceptionable beha- viour, gave them a little spot of ground, surrounded with fens and bushes, to dwell in. This place was called Ynswitrin by the natives, and situated upon the confines of his dominions. Afterwards two other pagan kings being affected with their remarkable sanctity, gave each of them a certain proportion of ground, and, at their request, settled twelve hides of land on them, by instruments in writing, according to the custom of the country; from whence it is supposed the twelve hides, now part of the abbey's estate, had their denomination. " The holy men being thus settled in this place, which was no better than a wilderness, were, in a short time, ordered by the Angel Gabriel, who appeared to them, to build a church in honour of the Blessed Virgin, in a place to which they were supernaturally directed; who, immediately pursuing their in- structions from heaven, built a chapel, the walls of which were made of osiers twisted together. This small structure was finished in the one and thirtieth year after our Saviour's Pas- sion, having little of ornament in the figure, but very remarkable for the Divine presence, and the beauty of holiness : and this being the first church in this island, the Son of God was pleased to grace it with a particular distinction, dedicating it Himself in honour of His mother." Insignificant as this church must have been as a work of art, except with a very liberal allowance for the circumstances under which it was erected, it would yet be preserved with more care than many a finer structure, for the interest of the associations w r ith which it was crowded. Accordingly we find so long after as the eleventh century, the wooden church of Glastonbury still remaining. Canute's Charter of Glastonbury was written and published in the wooden church, in presence of King Canute, in the year of our Lord 1032. 1 This was nearly a hundred years 1 Companion to Glossary. 6 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. after Dunstan had erected a far more splendid edifice at Glas- tonbury, but he probably retained this as a portion of his work, and through all successive changes its exact size and position were held in remembrance. In the more modern church as it stood till the Reformation, there was affixed to a column a brass plate bearing an inscription, which recorded the history of the erection and consecration of the church, together with the addi- tion of a chancel, on account of the greater number of brethren who worshipped there ; and though this addition was made, as the inscription bears, by Divine inspiration, yet so great reve- rence attached to the original proportions of the structure, that they were thus expressly recorded : " Lest the position or the size of the former church should be forgotten, on account of such additions, this column is erected, in a line drawn through the two eastern angles of the said church, towards the south, and dividing the before-mentioned chancel from it. And its length from the said line westward was sixty feet, and its breadth twenty-six feet, and the distance of the centre of this column from the middle point, between the said angles, forty-eight feet." 1 These dimensions have an interest not at first sight apparent, and form a very curious connecting link between the ecclesiastical architecture of England and of Ireland. Among the memorable names connected with Glastonbury, was that of S. Patrick, the 1 The whole inscription is given by domino reuelante ac sanctorum nu- Mr. Petrie from Sir Henry Spelman. mero in eadem crescente, quendam It is as follows: "Anno post pas- cancellum in orientali parte huic eccle- sionem domini xxxi° duodecim sancti sie adiecit et in honore beate virginis ex quibus Joseph ab Arimathia primus consecrauit. Cuius altare inestimabili erat, hue uenerunt, qui ecclesiam saphiro in perpetuam huius rei memo- huius regni primam in hoc loco con- riam insigniuit. Et ne locus aut struxerunt, qui Christi [quam Chris- quantitas prorsus [prioris] ecclesie tus] in honorem sue matris et locum per tales augmentaciones obliuioni pro eorum sepultura presencialiter traderetur : erigitur hec columpna in dedicauit. sancto Dauid Meneuencium linea per duos orientales angulos ejus- archiepiscopo hoc testante. Cui dom- dem ecclesie uersus meridiem protracta inus ecclesiam illam dedicare dispo- et predictum cancellum ab ea absciu- nenti in sompnis apparuit et eum a dente. Et erat ejus longitudo ab ilia proposito revocavit. necnon in signum linea uersus occidentem lx. pedum, quod ipse dominus ecclesiam ipsam latitudo uero ejus xxvi. pedum, dis- prius cum cimiterio dedicarat, manum tancia centri istius columpne a puncto episcopo digito perforavit, et sic per- medio inter predictos angulos xlviii. forata multis uidentibus in crastino pedum." apparuit ; postea uero idem episcopus, THE ANGLO-ROMAN PERIOD. ? Apostle of Ireland, who, according to the Glastonbury account, and some Irish legends, was buried in this church. Now it seems that sixty feet was the usual length even of the larger churches in Ireland, built under the direction of S. Patrick, and after his example for many centuries. 1 Mr. Petrie, in his very valuable inquiry into the origin and uses of round towers of Ireland, suggests that the general adoption of this size ori- ginated either in reverence for this model, (i. e., the church of Glastonbury,) or for some similar one derived from the primitive Christians. 2 From this year, 63, we have few or no accounts of the foun- dation of churches till the time of King Lucius ; but from the number attributed to him, whether truly or not, we may con- clude that ecclesiastical buildings were considerably multiplied in his time. The conversion of Lucius took place in 176, and his death in 201. Within this interval, according to Geoffry of Monmouth, the greatest part of Britain was cleared of heathen- ism, the revenues of the pagan priests were transferred to Chris- tian Bishops and Clergy, and many of the pagan temples cleansed of the relics of idolatry and false worship, were consecrated to the service of the true God. Britain was also divided at the same time into three provinces, formerly under the authority of heathen archnamens, and metropolitan churches were erected in London, York, and the city of Legions, 3 which its old wall and buildings show to have been situated on the river Uske in Gla- morganshire. 4 Lucius himself largely increased the ecclesias- tical revenues out of his royal patrimony, and built several churches. 5 The following which are connected in after ages with 1 On the subject of the size of the ancient churches of Ireland, Mr. Petrie has collected a mass of very curious matter ; among the rest he gives the history of the foundation of the great church of S. Patrick, near Feltown, in Meath, which is thus related in the tripartite history, ascribed to S. Evan. " In that very place where his residence was, (where he had received S. Pa- trick,) Conal laid the foundation of a church to God and S. Patrick, which was in length sixty of his feet ; (quod pedibus ejus LX pedum erat :) but he removed his habitation to another spot. And then Patrick said to him, ' Who- ever shall be so bold as to attempt anything against this church, his reign shall be neither happy nor long.' " — Petrie's Round Towers, p. 161. 3 See Petrie atpp.,161 and 193—196, 3 Carleon on Uske. 4 Geoffry of Monmouth, iv. 19, and v. l> 5 As an instance of the great exag- geration which may sometimes be found ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. many interesting* passages of the history of the Church or of architecture, are among the number : Westminster Abbey ; the chapel in Dover Castle ; the church of S. Martin, Canterbury ; the church and monastery of Winchester ; a school at Cam- bridge, and a school and church at Bangor. Glastonbury, already mentioned as the first church erected in England, was restored and greatly enriched by Lucius, and the good example of the sovereign was followed by his nobles ; for when he was engaged in the erection of S. Peter's, Cornhill, in London, Ciran, one of his courtiers, largely contributed to the work, at the request of Thean, Archbishop of London. Lucius died at Gloucester, and was buried in the great church there. Thus King Lucius occupies, as every Christian king in the like state of society ought to occupy, a considerable space in the history of ecclesiastical architecture. And perhaps all that we can really collect from the legendary importance attached to his name, is the strong sense which a Christian people had of the obligation in kings to provide for the worship of God, and the grateful recognition of their fidelity in fulfilling it. King Lucius was the impersonation of a Christian, and a missionary prince, nursing and cherishing the Church with all his heart, and all his power ; and not neglecting, as indeed no truly pious Churchman will neglect, the exterior and material comeliness of her services. As the perfection of chivalry and a greater number of chivalrous exploits than one man ever performed, were afterwards attributed to King Arthur, the mirror of Christian knighthood ; so were all Christian energy and devo- tion, and many more acts of beneficence than can satisfactorily be appropriated to him, given to Lucius, the Christian king. This gives to the story a mythical instead of a literal and circumstantial truth ; but still we may safely infer, that before the end of the second century many churches had been erected in England, and that the sanctity of the Lord's house was generally acknowledged. The next century opens with a disastrous period for the in such stories, we may adduce the words of Nennius, who tells us (54) that S. Patrick wrote three hundred and sixty-five canonical and other works, relating to the Catholic faith , and founded as many churches, and consecrated as many Bishops. THE ANGLO-ROMAN PERIOD. 9 Church. The Dioclesian persecution commenced in 303, and continued during the ten succeeding years ; and though in Bri- tain its fierceness was mitigated, and its duration limited by Constantius Chlorus, who governed here with the title of Csesar, yet many Christians were put to death, and the churches were everywhere demolished. 1 One of those who earned a glorious crown in the persecution must not be lightly passed over. The story of S. Alban, the English protomartyr, is mingled with some doubtful particulars ; but since what is true in it induced those Christians who sur- vived him to erect the first church on the spot from whence he rose to receive his crown, and since what is doubtful was reported and believed by the generations who enlarged the first founda- tion, the whole of the story, as related by Gildas and Bede, enters into the philosophy of the history of ecclesiastical art in England. " S. Alban, for charity's sake, saved another confessor who was pursued by his persecutors, by hiding him in his house, and then by changing clothes with him ; imitating in this the example of Christ, Who laid down His life for His sheep, and exposing himself in the other's clothes to be pursued in his stead. So pleasing to God was this conduct, that between his confession and martyrdom, he was honoured with the performance of wonderful miracles. " Being led to execution, he came to a river which, with a most rapid course, ran between the wall of the town and the arena where he was to be executed. He there saw a multitude of persons of both sexes, and of several ages and conditions, which was doubtlessly assembled by Divine instinct, to attend the blessed confessor and martyr, and had so taken up the bridge on the river, that he could scarce pass over that evening. S. Alban therefore, urged by an ardent and devout wish to arrive quickly at martyrdom, drew near to the stream, and on lifting up his eyes to heaven, the channel was immediately dried up, and he per- ceived that the water had departed, and made way for him to pass. Among the rest, the executioner who was to have put him to death ob- served this, and, moved by Divine inspiration, hastened to meet him at the place of execution, and casting down the sword which he had carried ready drawn, fell at his feet, praying that he might rather suffer with the martyr, whom he was ordered to execute, or, if possible, instead of him. " Whilst he thus from a persecutor was become a companion in the faith, and the other executioners hesitated to take up the sword which 1 Gildas, i. 9. 10 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. was lying on the ground, the reverend confessor, accompanied by the multitude, ascended a hill about five hundred paces from the place, adorned, or rather clothed with all kinds of flowers, having its sides neither perpendicular, nor even craggy, but sloping down into a most beautiful plain, worthy from its lovely appearance to be the scene of a martyr's sufferings. On the top of this hill S. Alban prayed that God would give him water, and immediately a living spring broke out before his feet, the course being confined, so that all men perceived that the river also had been dried up in consequence of the martyr's presence. Here, therefore, the head of our most courageous martyr was struck off, and here he received the crown of life, which God has promised to those who love Him. But he who gave the wicked stroke, was not permitted to rejoice over the deceased; for his eyes dropped upon the ground, together with the blessed martyr's head. " The blessed Alban suffered death on the twenty-second day of June, near the city of Verulam, where afterwards, when peaceable Christian times were restored, a church of wonderful workmanship, and suitable to his martyrdom, was erected. In which place, there ceases not to this day the cure of sick persons, and the frequent working of wonders." The visit of Germanus to the church of S. Alban comes so nearly within this portion of the history that we shall subjoin it, only noting that it is valuable also as affording indications of the growth of principles other than simply Christian, which had already in some degree affected the arrangement of churches. "The heresy of Pelagius having been refuted and all the people's hearts settled in the purity of the faith, the priests repaired to the tomb of the martyr, S. Alban, to give thanks to God through him. There Germanus, having with him relics of all the Apostles, and of several martyrs, after offering up his prayers, commanded the tomb to be opened, that he might lay up therein some precious gifts; judging it convenient, that the limbs of saints brought together from several countries, as their equal merits had procured them admission into heaven, should be preserved in one tomb." 1 William of Malmsbury adds Offa to the benefactors of the same church, before the Norman conquest. This monarch ordered the relics of S. Alban, at that time obscurely buried, to be taken up, and placed in a shrine decorated right royally 1 Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica, i. 18. him a popular saint in England, and This visit of S. Germanus rendered many churches were dedicated to him. THE ANGLO-ROMAN PERIOD. 11 with gold and jewels,, and a church of most beautiful workman- ship was there erected, and a society of monks assembled. 1 From the close of the Dioclesian persecution to the rise of the Arian heresy, the British Church had rest ; and Christ's disciples, after so long and wintry a night, beginning to behold the genial light of heaven, rebuilt the churches which had been overthrown, and founded and erected others which they dedi- cated to the holy martyrs, 2 everywhere displaying the banner of the faith as a token of their victory ; and though we have no direct evidence of the extent to which this labour was carried, yet we hear now and then incidentally of churches, as not infre- quent, as for instance, in the case of Germanus and Lupus, who when they came over (a.d. 429) to oppose the Pelagian heresy, preached, as we are expressly told, in churches as well as in the fields and highways. It would be in vain to attempt a description of the ecclesias- tical architecture of the Anglo-Roman period, not a single building originally designed for the services of the Christian church at that era still remaining in England, unless the 1 It may be well to state that no portions of this or any preceding church remain at S. Alban's ; the oldest existing portion is attributed to Paul de Caen, Abbot, from 1077 to 1093. 2 The dedication of churches is a subject worthy of more attention than is usually bestowed upon it, on his- toric grounds. As applied to Welsh churches, it has been very fully dis- cussed, and very satisfactorily applied, by Mr. Rice Rees, in his u Essay on the Welsh Saints, or the Primitive Christians usually considered to have been the founders of Churches in Wales." His arguments lead to the conclusion that churches dedicated to the Welsh saints, or rather still called by their name, are the most ancient, and range generally from a.d. 500 to 550 ; to those dedicated to S. Michael he assigns in general terms the period between 800 to 850, at about which time the Britons began a more general conformity with the religious obser- vances of the rest of the Western Church, and borrowed of course dedi- cations, as well as other things, from them ; and finally, to the twelfth century, or thereabouts, belong the churches dedicated to the Blessed Virgin, the holy Apostles, the saints of the Roman calendar. These de- ductions are fortified by external evi- dence collected from general and eccle- siastical history, from the territorial distribution of the several churches, and their mutual relations. The ques- tion is of course historical rather than architectural, for the present fabric does not often go back even to the middle time indicated above : we shall not therefore pursue the question here, but we would not miss the opportunity of borrowing a hint from Mr. Rees' Essay, and of directing the general reader to its very instructive pages. 12 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. multangular tower at Dover called the Pharos, be an exception, and the only encouragement to call this a church, or part of a church, is that we know not what else it may have been. But though so little is to be said of the ecclesiastical archi- tecture of the Romans in England, there can be no doubt that a very considerable advance was made during the continuance of the Roman sway, in the churches erected by the earliest converts: for Tacitus tells us, that Agricola encouraged the British to cul- tivate building, with the other arts of peace ; and when the Emperor Constantine rebuilt the city of Autun, about the end of the third century, he brought the workmen chiefly from Britain, which very much abounded with the best artificers ; and it cannot be doubted, that the skill thus acquired and approved would be employed in the erection of their sacred edifices. Still we must confess that the authority of imperial Rome was brought to a close, without having directly added much to the history of our ecclesiastical architecture. The indirect influence of the Roman sway was, however, very great. It was under the Empire, that the British people first learned certain mechanical arts, which were afterwards employed in religious edifices ; and if they had not been forced to assist in the erection of Verulam or Richborough, the churches of S. Alban's and of Canterbury might have been very different from what they are now. Even the use of mortar was, so far as we can discover, introduced by the Romans and the making of brick is certainly one of the arts which they left behind them. The latter affords an instance of the extensive secondary influence on architecture which a single invention may exert. At first sight it would appear that the introduction of brick would only be followed by the use of that material instead of stone ; 2 but, in fact, it seems to have greatly influenced the decorative forms of the Saxon and Norman architects. The Roman bricks were of a very different form 1 There are no traces of " the use of lime in a calcined state mixed with water and sand, or any other substance, so as to form an adhesive cement, by which stone could be joined to stone," in any relics of the aboriginal architec- ture of our island. See a paper on ancient mixed masonry of brick and stone, by Mr. Bloxam, in No. IV. of the Archaeological Journal. 2 Roman stations were sometimes quarries, out of which Saxon and Nor- man architects collected materials, chiefly brick, for their churches. Brix- worth, Colchester, and S. Alban's are among the most remarkable examples. THE ANGLO ROMAN PERIOD. 13 from that so long imposed on our bricks by the excise laws. 1 They were long, broad, and flat : 2 this shape was for a long time retained by the Saxon builders. Now, bricks of this form fall very naturally into what is called " herring-bone" masonry; and from this way of laying the materials, the zigzag — one of the most effective of the Norman decorations — seems to have taken its rise; while other ornaments, as the billet and serrated mouldings, and the various arrangements of masonry, by which large surfaces are sometimes relieved, are derived from brick in its native application to ornamental building. A still less direct, but far more important, influence the Romans exercised by their treatment of the Christians. The persecutions inflicted by Pagan masters stirred up another class of feelings, attaching the brethren to their holy faith, and giving them martyrs, whose memorials employed the successive labours of Christian artists of all kinds, for many generations. The history of the Abbey of S. Alban, 3 which is, in fact, a mar- tyrium, would be a fair epitome of the history of ecclesiastical art in England ; and it is needless to say how much that church owes to the sword, which dismissed the soul of our protomartyr to a better kingdom. 1 These and the window tax have had a very remarkable effect on our archi- tecture, domestic, in the first instance, but, by consequence, ecclesiastical also, if we can be said to have had until lately, any ecclesiastical architecture, since the imposition of these taxes. The influence of both has been in- jurious, and sadly destructive of pic- turesque character in our buildings. 2 They were not always of one size, but about 16 x 12 X 1| inches, was an ordinary shape and size. 3 Since this passage was written, a very careful " History of the Architec- ture of the Abbey-church of S. Alban, with especial reference to the Norman structure," has been published by J. C. Buckler, and C. A. Buckler. 14 CHAPTER II. The Mythical Period. Desertion of Britain by the Romans. — Destruction of Churches by the Barbarians. — Ambrosius Aurelianus restores Churches. — Use of Myths and Legends as affording materials for His- tory. — Merlin and Vortigern. — Blood used in the foundation of Buildings. — Alexander, Bishop of Lincoln. — Merlin and Ambrosius Aurelianus. — Stonehenge. — The triumph of Art over Strength. — King Arthur restores Churches. — The Splendour of his Coronation. In the year 430 the Romans left England, after having long afforded a doubtful defence against the repeated invasions of the Picts and Scots. The ravages of these barbarians extended over the greater part of the country which they were afterwards to colonize, and were as frequent as they were extensive. Gildas and Bede relate especially how the battle of Wippedsflede was followed by a furious irruption, which they compare with the destruction of Jerusalem by the Chaldeans. Churches were burnt, and the priests slain upon the altars, and once again the words of the Psalmist were fulfilled, " They have set fire upon Thy holy places, and have defiled the dwelling place of Thy name, even to the ground ; thus have they burnt up all the houses of God in the land/" 1 Gildas proceeds : " All the co- lumns were levelled with the ground by the frequent strokes of the battering-ram, all the husbandmen routed, together with their bishops, priests, and people, whilst the sword gleamed, and the flames crackled around them on every side. Lamentable to behold, in the midst of the streets lay the tops of lofty towers, tumbled to the ground, stones of high walls, holy altars, frag- ments of human bodies, covered with livid clots of coagulated blood." 2 There were, however, many fluctuations in the fortunes of war, and wherever the British succeeded in driving the barba- 1 Psalm lxxiv. 8, 9. 2 Gildas, 24. THE MYTHICAL PERIOD. 15 rians away from any district, there they probably restored the churches. In particular we are told that Ambrosius Aurelianus, a native of this island, but of imperial extraction, having been chosen to lead the Britons, achieved a great victory over the Saxons, who had been called in by Vortigern to assist in repel- ling the Picts and Scots, and became in their turn formidable enemies, at Bannesdown, (a.d. 489) near Bath, and afterwards, by his influence, the churches were generally restored, and Di- vine worship was brought back to its former decent solemnity. From the utter disproportion between events and records in times of imperfect civilization, and frequent revolutions, when battles were numerous and historians few, this is far more than the ages which preceded or followed it, an age of myths and legends; and few names are more connected with legendary lore than that of Ambrosius Aurelianus. I have already, in speaking of King Lucius, and of the martyrdom of S. Alban, mentioned part of the grounds on which the legendary stories of such times, in the very form in which they were first told and believed, are among the materials of the philosophy of history ; and I will now add, as an introduction to the wildest stories of the kind that I shall have to relate, that they convey a truth, or a fact in the way of allegory, of which perhaps we find no other contem- porary recognition. And even if, perchance, we should in any instance find a meaning, true in itself, but not intended by the relaters of the legend, we should be like the student in the intro- duction to Gil Bias, who found the soul of the licentiate Peter Garcias in the form of a well filled purse, accompanied with a warning to make a better use of it than Peter himself had made. The history of Merlin, in the fifth century, is but a record of the triumph of art over brute force, in which it is exactly parallel with that of Dunstan in the tenth century ; the one having re- ceived a monkish, the other a bardic dress : and we may add that the very existence of Stonehenge and the like structures, in the absence of all authentic history of their erection, would enforce the belief that great mechanical skill was applied by the ancient inhabitants of the British Isles, whether Pagan, Druid- ical, or Christian, in the erection of their temples. The story of Merlin, as related by GeofFry of Monmouth, whose history is given in the form of a communication by word 16 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. of mouth, to Alexander, Bishop of Lincoln, in the twelfth cen- tury, is first introduced in connection with Vortigern, a British prince, on whom rests the stigma of having first called in the Saxons to repel the invasions of the Picts, (a.d. 447) . This policy had its usual fatal effect, and Vortigern, a prisoner to the Saxons, purchased his liberty at the expense of his country, and retired in despair to the mountains of Wales. His magicians advised him to build a strong tower for his own safety, since he had lost all his fortified places. Accordingly he made a progress about the country, to find out a convenient situation, and came at last to Mount Erir, where he assembled workmen from several countries, and ordered them to build a tower. The builders began to lay the foundation, but whatever they did one day the earth swallowed up the next. Vortigern being informed of this, again consulted with his magicians, who told him that he must find a youth that never had a father, and kill him, and then sprinkle the stones and cement with his blood; 1 for by those means, they said, he would have a firm foundation. We pass over the accident and its results by which Vortigern became acquainted with the birth of Merlin, whose mother, daughter of the king of Demetia, and a nun in S. Peter's Church, protested that none but an incubus had been the father of the child ; and the rest of the story we give almost wholly in the words of Geoffry. While the examination proceeded which led to this announcement, " Merlin was attentive to all that had passed, and then approached the king and said to him, ' For what reason am I and my mother introduced into your presence ?' ' My magicians,' answered Vortigern, 1 advised me to seek out a man that had no father, with whose blood my building is to be sprinkled, in order to make it stand.' 1 Order your magicians,' said Merlin, ' to come before me, and I will convict them of a lie.' The king was surprised at his words, and presently ordered the magicians to come, and sit down before Merlin, who spoke to them after this manner : ' Be- cause you are ignorant what it is that hinders the foundation of the tower, 1 This seems to be an ancient super- stition among the British. Fitzstephen in his description of London, says that the town was built with mortar tem- pered with the blood of beasts. Habct ab oriente arcem Palatinam, maximam et fortissimam, cujus et area et muri a fundamento profundissimo exurgunt ; ccemento cum sanguine animalium tem- perato. The writer evidently attri- butes the strength of the citadel as much to the blood as to the depth of the foundation. THE MYTHICAL PERIOD. 17 you have recommended the shedding of my blood for cement to it, as if that would presently make it stand. But tell me now, what is there under the foundation ? for something there is that will not suffer it to stand.' The magicians at this began to be afraid, and made him no answer. Then said Merlin, who was also called Ambrose, 1 ' I entreat your majesty would command your workmen to dig into the ground, and you will find a pond which causes the foundation to sink.' This accordingly was done. Mer- lin after this went again to the magicians, and said, 1 Tell me, ye false sycophants, what is there under the pond ?' But they were silent. Then said he again to the king, ' Command the pond to be drained, and at the bottom you will see two hollow stones, and in them two dragons asleep.' The king made no scruple of believing him, since he had found true what he had said of the pond, and therefore ordered it to be drained, which done, he found as Merlin had said, and now was possessed of the greatest admiration of him. Nor were the rest that were present less amazed, thinking it to be no less than Divine inspiration." The historian had got thus far in his relation, when Alexan- der, 2 who was one of the most munificent prelates and greatest architects of the age, struck probably with the practical lesson thus quaintly conveyed of the necessity of looking well to the foundation, if one would raise a worthy superstructure, engaged him in a digression on the prophecies of Merlin. But we will leave Alexander to speculate on the meaning of more remote prophecies, and return to Geoffry's relation of the warning which he gave Vortigern of his end, and how it came to pass accord- ingly. " Vortigern, being curious to learn his own fate, desired the young man to tell him what he knew concerning that particular. Merlin answered, 4 Fly the fire of the sons of Constantine, if you are able to do it : already are they fitting out their ships ; already are they leaving the Armorican shore ; already are they spreading out their sails to the wind. Two deaths in- stantly threaten you ; nor is it easy to determine which you can best avoid. 1 Heissocalledby Nennius through- pugnacious uncle, to better purpose; out. for the Cathedral of Lincoln, being 2 Alexander, Bishop of Lincoln, was destroyed by fire during his episco- nephew of Roger, Bishop of Salisbury, pate, he restored it at his own charges, a prelate not less magnificent in his to more than its former magnificence, carriage than Alexander himself, nor a Such persons could take more than a less industrious architect ; but unfor- passing interest in the legendary his- tunately for himself and his family tory of Merlin. We shall have a future he built castles instead of churches. opportunity of speaking of Roger and Alexander applied the skill which he Alexander. had acquired in the household of his 18 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. On the one hand the Saxons shall lay waste your country, and endeavour to kill you : on the other shall arrive the two brothers, Aurelius Ambro- sius and Uther Pendragon, who shall revenge their father's murder upon you. Seek some refuge if you can : to-morrow they will be on the shore of Totness. The faces of the Saxons shall look red with blood, Hengist shall be killed, and Aurelius Ambrosius shall be crowned. He shall bring peace to the nation : he shall restore the churches. 9 Accordingly the next day early, arrived Aurelius Ambrosius and his brother, with ten thousand men." I shall not relate how Ambrosius was crowned, or how he and his host beleaguered Vortigern in his strong tower. But Geoffry again shall tell how — " they set their engines to work, and laboured to beat down the walls. But at last, when all attempts failed, they had recourse to fire, which meeting with proper fuel, ceased not to rage till it had burnt down the tower and Vortigern in it. " The enemies being now entirely reduced, the king summoned the con- suls and princes of the kingdom together at York, where he gave orders for the restoration of the churches which the Saxons had destroyed. He himself undertook the rebuilding of the metropolitan church of that city, as also the other cathedral churches in that province. After fifteen days, when he had settled workmen in several places, he went to London, which city had not escaped the fury of the enemy. He beheld with great sorrow the destruction made in it, and recalled the remainder of the citizens from all parts, and began the restoration of it. Here he settled the affairs of the whole kingdom, revived the laws, restored the right heirs to the pos- sessions of their ancestors ; and those estates, whereof the heirs had been lost in the late grievous calamity, he distributed among his fellow sol- diers. In these important concerns of restoring the nation to its ancient state, repairing the churches, re-establishing peace and law, and settling the administration of justice, was his time wholly employed. From hence he went to Winchester, to repair the ruins of it, as he did of other cities ; and when the work was finished there, he went, at the instance of Bishop Eldad, to the monastery near Kaercaradoc, now Salisbury, where the con- suls and princes, whom the wicked Hengist had treacherously murdered, lay buried. At this place was a convent that maintained three hundred friars, situated on the mountain of Ambrius, who, as is reported, had been the founder of it. The sight of the place where the dead lay, made the king, who was of a compassionate temper, shed tears, and at last enter upon thoughts, what kind of monument to erect upon it. For he thought something ought to be done to perpetuate the memory of that piece of ground, which was honoured with the bodies of so many noble patriots, that died for their country. " For this purpose he summoned together several carpenters and masons, THE MYTHICAL PERIOD. 19 and commanded them to employ the utmost of their art, in contriving some new structure, for a lasting monument to those great men. But they, in diffidence of their own skill, refusing to undertake it, Tremounus, Archbishop of the City of Legions, went to the king, and said, ' If any one living is able to execute your commands, Merlin, the prophet of Vortigern, is the man. In my opinion there is not in all your kingdom a person of a brighter genius, either in predicting future events, or in mechanical con- trivances. Order him to come to you, and exercise his skill in the work which you design.' Whereupon Aurelius, after he had asked a great many questions concerning him, despatched several messengers into the countries to find him out, and bring him to him. As soon as they had delivered their message, they conducted him to the king, who received him with joy, and, being curious to hear some of his wonderful speeches, commanded him to prophesy. Merlin made answer, ' Mysteries of this kind are not to be revealed but when there is the greatest necessity for it. If I should pretend to utter them either for ostentation or diversion, the spirit that instructs me would be silent, and would leave me when I should have occasion for it.' "When he had made the same refusal to all the rest present, the king would not urge him any longer about his predictions, but spoke to him concerning the monument which he designed. 1 If you are desirous,' said Merlin, ' to honour the burying-place of these men with an everlasting monument, send for the Giant's Dance, which is in Killaraus, a mountain in Ireland. For there is a structure of stones there, which none of this age could, raise, without a profound knowledge of the mechanical arts. They are stones of a vast magnitude and wonderful quality ; and if they can be placed here as they are there, round this spot of ground, they will stay there for ever.' "At these words of Merlin, Aurelius burst into laughter, and said, 1 How is it possible to remove such vast stones from so distant a country, as if Britain was not furnished with stones fit for the work ?' Merlin re- plied, 4 1 entreat your majesty to forbear vain laughter, for what I say is without vanity. They are mystical stones, and of a medicinal virtue. The giants of old brought them from the farthest coasts of Africa, and placed them in Ireland, while they inhabited that country. Their design in this was to make baths in them, when they should be taken with any illness. For their method was to wash the stones, and put their sick into the water, which infallibly cured them. With the like success they cured wounds also, adding only the application of some herbs. There is not a stone there which has not some healing virtue.' When the Britons heard this, they resolved to send for the stones, and to make war upon the peo- ple of Ireland if they should offer to detain them. And to accomplish this business, they made choice of Uther Pendragon, who was to be at- tended with fifteen thousand men. They chose also Merlin himself, by whose direction the whole affair was to be managed. A fleet being there- fore got ready, they set sail, and with a fair wind arrived in Ireland. " At that time Gillomanius, a youth of wonderful valour, reigned in c 2 20 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Ireland; who, upon the news of the arrival of the Britons in his kingdom, levied a vast army, and marched out against them. And when he had learned the occasion of their coming, he smiled, and said to those about him, ' No wonder a cowardly race of people were able to make so great devastation in the island of Britain, when the Britons are such brutes and fools. Was ever the like folly heard of ? What are the stones of Ireland better than those of Britain, that our kingdom must be put to this distur- bance for them ? To arms, soldiers, and defend your country ; while I have life they shall not take from us the least stone of the Giant's Dance.' Uther, seeing them prepared for a battle, attacked them ; nor was it long ere the Britons had the advantage, who, having dispersed and killed the Irish, forced Gillomanius to flee. After the victory they went to the mountain Killaraus, and arrived at the structure of stones, the sight of which filled them both with joy and admiration. And while they were standing round them, Merlin came up to them, and said, 'Now try your forces, young men, and see whether strength or art can do the most towards taking down these stones.' At this word they all set to their engines with one accord, and attempted the removing of the Giant's Dance. Some prepared cables, others small ropes, others ladders for the work, but all to no purpose. Merlin laughed at their vain efforts, and then began his own contrivances. When he had placed in order the engines that were neces- sary, he took down the stones with incredible facility, and gave directions for carrying them to the ships, and placing them therein. This done, they with joy set sail again to return to Britain, where they arrived with a fair gale, and repaired to the burying place with the stones. When Aurelius had notice of it, he sent messengers to all parts of Britain, to summon the Clergy and people together to the mount of Ambrius, in order to celebrate with joy and honour the erection of the monument. Upon this summons ap- peared the bishops, abbots, and people of all other orders and qualities ; and upon the day and place appointed for their general meeting, Aurelius placed the crown upon his head, and with royal pomp celebrated the feast of Pentecost, the solemnity whereof he continued the three following days. In the meantime, all places of honour that were vacant, he bestowed upon his domestics, as rewards for their good services. At that time the two metropolitan sees of York and Legions were vacant ; and with the general consent of the people, whom he was willing to please in his choice, he granted York to Sanxo, a man of great quality, and much celebrated for his piety ; and the City of Legions to Dubricius, whom Divine Providence had pointed out as a most useful pastor in that place. As soon as he had settled these and other affairs in the kingdom, he ordered Merlin to set up the stones brought over from Ireland, about the sepulchre ; which he ac- cordingly did, and placed them in the same manner as they had been in the mountain Killaraus, and thereby gave a manifest PROOF OF THE PREVA- LENCE OF ART ABOVE STRENGTH."* * Geoffry of Monmouth, viii. 9, 10, 11, 12. THE MYTHICAL PERIOD. 21 It is quite unnecessary to add, that Geoffry of Monmouth is not adduced as giving a true account of the date or manner of the erection of Stonehenge. He is, however, the first person whose extant works give any account of that remarkable triumph of art over strength, and he professes to have translated his ac- count from a Welsh MS. of still more remote antiquity. 1 Nor is his account at all less probable than any other that has been proposed ; and perhaps, allowing for the fabulous adjuncts of the story, it may after all be the true one. At all events, the barrows which accompany the stones, fortify the assertion of Geoffry that the edifice was a memorial of the dead. The real purpose which such relations serve, is to show the effect on the less skilful crowd of the application of mechanical powers to purposes which were before effected only by the united strength of many. Nor are we even yet exempt from the wonder which some modern Merlin excites by the use of a new and hitherto unheard-of machine effecting by a kind of magic what would have appeared before impossible. We have already alluded to King Arthur, as the flower and example of British chivalry. He is one of the principal mythi- cal personages of this era, and he was not, according to the just view of the character which he represents, deficient in his care for the services and buildings of the Church. " The King, after his general pardon to the Scots, went to York to celebrate the feast of Christ's Nativity, which was now at hand. On entering the city, he beheld with grief the desolation of churches ; for upon the expulsion of the holy Archbishop Sanxo, and of all the Clergy there, the temples which were half burnt down, had no longer Divine Service performed in them, so much had the impious rage of the pagans prevailed. After this, in an assembly of the Clergy and people, he appointed Pyramus his chaplain metropolitan of that see. The churches that lay level with the ground, he rebuilt, and (which was their chief ornament,) saw them filled with assemblies of devout persons of both sexes." 2 1 To speak more correctly, the ori- ginal of the work of Geoffry of Mon- mouth was an Armorican chronicle, brought into Wales from Brittany by Walter de Masses, in the twelfth cen- tury ; but the substance of several of the legends was known in Wales before his time, as appears from the work of Nennius, which agrees with Geoffry, among other things, in much that is related in this Chapter. See Mr. Rice Rees' Essay on the Welsh Saints, &c. 2 Geoffry of Monmouth, xix. 8. 22 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. The conduct of many a noble knight in after ages, showed that the duty thus supposed to be fulfilled by Arthur, was recog- nized by those who followed him in all chivalrous exercises. The coronation of Arthur is related with as many circum- stances connected with our subject, as we should collect with great labour from other sources, which have none of the sobriety of truth. " Upon the approach of the feast of Pentecost, Arthur, the better to demonstrate his joy after such triumphant success, and for the more solemn observation of that festival, and reconciling the minds of the princes that were now subject to him, resolved, during that season, to hold a magni- ficent court, to place the crown upon his head, and to invite all the kings and dukes under his subjection, to the solemnity. And when he had communicated his design to his familiar friends, he pitched upon the City of Legions as a proper place for this purpose. For besides its great wealth above the other cities, its situation — which was in Glamorganshire, upon the river Usk, near the Severn sea, — was most pleasant and fit for so great a solemnity. For on one side it was washed by that noble river, so that the kings and princes from the countries beyond the seas might have the convenience of sailing up to it. On the other side, the beauty of the meadows and groves, and magnificence of the royal palaces with lofty gilded roofs 1 that adorned it, made it even rival the grandeur of Rome. It was also famous for two churches, — whereof one was built in honour of the martyr Julius, and adorned with a choir of virgins, who had devoted themselves wholly to the service of God; but the other which was founded in memory of S. Aaron, 2 his companion, and maintained a convent of canons, was the third metropolitan church of Britain. Besides, there was a college of two hundred philosophers, who, being learned in astronomy and the other arts, were diligent in observing the courses of the stars ; and gave Arthur true predictions of the events that would hap- pen at that time. In this place, therefore, which afforded such delights, were preparations made for the ensuing festival." " When all were assembled together in the city, upon the day of the solemnity, the Archbishops were conducted to the palace, in order to place the crown upon the king's head. Therefore Dubricius, inasmuch as the court was kept in his diocese, made himself ready to celebrate the office, and undertook the ordering of whatever related to it. As soon as the king was invested with his royal habiliments, he was conducted in great pomp to the metropolitan church, supported on each side by two Archbishops, and having four kings, viz., of Albania, Cornwall, Demetia, and Venedotia, 1 We shall find gilded roofs men- martyrdom during the Dioclesian per- tioned on a future occasion. secution, 2 SS, Julius and Aaron had suffered THE MYTHICAL PERIOD. 23 whose right it was, bearing four golden swords before him. He was also attended with a concert of all sorts of music, which made most excel- lent harmony. On another part was the queen, dressed out in her richest ornaments, conducted by the Archbishops and Bishops to the Temple of Virgins ; the four queens also of the kings last mentioned, bearing before her four white doves according to ancient custom ; and after her there followed a retinue of women, making all imaginable demonstrations of joy. When the whole procession was ended, so transporting was the har- mony of the musical instruments and voices, whereof there was a great variety in both churches, that the knights who attended were in doubt which to prefer, and therefore crowded from the one to the other by turns, and were far from being tired with the solemnity, though the whole day had been spent in it. At last, when Divine service was over at both churches, the king and queen put off their crowns, and putting on their lighter ornaments, went to the banquet ; he to one palace with the men, and she to another with the women. For the Britons still observed the ancient custom of Troy, by which the men and women used to celebrate their festivals apart. When they had all taken their seats according to precedence, Caius the server, in rich robes of ermine, with a thousand young noblemen, all in like manner clothed with ermine, served up the dishes. From another part, Bedver, the butler, was followed with the same number of attendants, in various habits, who waited with all kinds of cups and drinking vessels. In tfye queen's palace were innumerable waiters, dressed with variety of ornaments, all performing their respective offices ; which if I should describe particularly, I should draw out the his- tory to a tedious length. For at that time Britain had arrived at such a pitch of grandeur, that in abundance of riches, luxury of ornaments, and politeness of inhabitants, it far surpassed all other kingdoms. The knights in it that were famous for feats of chivalry, wore their clothes and arms all of the same colour and fashion ; and the women also no less celebrated for their wit, wore all the same kind of apparel, and esteemed none worthy of their love, but such as had given a proof of their valour in three several battles. Thus was the valour of the men an encouragement for the wo- men's chastity, and the love of the women a spur to the soldiers' bravery. " As soon as the banquets were over, they went into the fields without the city, to divert themselves with various sports. The military men com- posed a kind of diversion in imitation of a fight on horseback ; and the ladies, placed on the top of the walls as spectators, in a sportive manner darted their amorous glances at the courtiers, the more to encourage them. Others spent the remainder of the day in other diversions, such as shooting with bows and arrows, tossing the pike, casting of heavy stones and rocks, playing at dice and the like, and all these inoffensively and without quarrelling. Whoever gained the victory in any of these sports, was rewarded with a rich prize by Arthur. In this manner were the first three days spent ; and on the fourth, all who, upon account of their titles, bore any kind of office at this solemnity, were called together to receive 24 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. honours and preferments in reward of their services, and to fill up the vacancies in the governments of cities and castles, archbishoprics, bishop- rics, abbeys, and other posts of honour." 1 If we have given too much importance to such legendary lore, (which, however, those who are willing to accept the fable for the truth which it shadows forth will scarcely assert,) let it be remembered that it has afforded us a chapter on times which graver history handles most unsatisfactorily. The events of the next page, under the touch of the venerable Bede, who treats them with exceeding love for his high subject, and with reve- rential regard for truth, are fruitful in the subjects of our study, and as worthy to be classed with the materials of undoubted history as those of any succeeding period. 1 GeoftYy of Monmouth, ix. 12, 13, 14. The quotations are all made from Dr. Giles's translation. 25 CHAPTER III. The Saxon Period. From the coming of Augustine to the birth of Dunstan. Arrival of Augustine, and his Establishment at Canterbury. — He reconciles heathen temples, and founds a monastery and the Cathedral Church. — Mission of Paulinus to Northumbria. A Baptistery of Wood erected at York, and afterwards sur- rounded with a Stone Church. — Other Churches erected by Paulinus, especially at Campodonum, and Lincoln. — Columba and Iona. — Oswald and Lindisfarne ; Finan's Cathedral there. — Cedd and Lastingham. — Cuthbert and Farne. — Mr. Petrie on the Origin and Uses of Round Towers in Ire- land. — Other Monasteries and their Founders. — Benedict Biscop, and Wearmouth and Jarrow. — Of Building more Romano. — Wilfrid and Hexham, from Eddius, and Richard of Hexham. When Augustine came to Britain in 597, he found traces in- deed of a British race, and of a Christian people ; but the churches were few, and the worshippers in proportion still fewer, and all decent pomp had departed from the service of the rem- nant that remained. Ethelbert, however, King of Kent, though himself, together with his subjects, a heathen, was not wholly unprepared to re- ceive the missionary with favour, for he had a Christian wife of the royal family of the Franks, called Bertha ; whom he had received from her parents, upon condition that she should be permitted to practise her religion with the Bishop Luidhard, who was sent with her to preserve her faith. " Some days after the arrival of Augustine, the King came into the island, and sitting in the open air, ordered Augustine and his companions to be brought into his presence. For he had taken precaution that they should not come to him in any house, lest, according to an ancient super- stition, if they practised any magical arts, they might impose upon him, and so get the better of him. But they came furnished with Divine, not 26 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. with magic virtue, bearing a silver cross for their banner, and the image of our Lord and Saviour painted on a board; 1 and singing the litany, they offered up their prayers to the Lord for the eternal salvation both of themselves and of those to whom they were come. Ethelbert received them favourably, and permitted them to reside in the city of Canterbury, which was the metropolis of all his dominions, and did not refuse them liberty to preach. It is reported that, as they drew near to the city, after their manner, with the holy cross, and the image of our sovereign Lord and King, Jesus Christ, they in concert sang this litany. 2 1 We beseech Thee, O Lord, in all Thy mercy, that Thy anger and wrath be turned away from this city, and from Thy holy house, because we have sinned. Hallelujah. " As soon as they entered the dwelling-place assigned them, they began to imitate the course of life practised in the primitive Church ; applying themselves to frequent prayer, watching and fasting ; preaching the word of life to as many as they could ; despising all worldly things, as not be- longing to them ; receiving only their necessary food from those they taught, living themselves in all respects conformably to what they pre- scribed to others, and being always disposed to suffer any adversity, and even to die for that truth which they preached. In short, several believed and were baptized, admiring the simplicity of their innocent life, and the sweetness of their heavenly doctrine. There was on the east side of the city, a church dedicated to the honour of S. Martin, built whilst the Romans were still in the island, 3 wherein the queen, who as has been said before, was a Christian, used to pray. In this they first began to meet, to sing, to pray, to say mass, to preach, and to baptize, till the king, being con- verted to the faith, allowed them to preach openly, and build or repair churches in all places. ,n Gregory, by whom Augustine had been sent to Britain, was not unmindful of the Saxon Church, now that it was committed to the care of a missionary Bishop, but hearing from Augustine, that he had a great harvest, and but few labourers, sent to him several fellow-labourers, of whom the first and principal were 1 Imaginem Domini Salvatoris in tabula depictara. Just such, I pre- sume, were the pictures brought by Benedict Biscop from Rome : and as those mentioned above were used in a procession without doors, they were probably painted with oil. To this subject we shall recur in a future chapter. 2 More suo cum cruce sancta, et imagine magni Regis Domini Nostri Jesu Christi, hanc laetaniam consona voce modularentur. 3 Erat autem prope ipsam civitatem ad orientem, ecclesia in honorem sancti Martini antiquitus facta, dum adhuc Romani Britanniam incolerent. 4 Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica, i. 25, 26. I may state, once for all, that I have generally used Dr. Giles's trans- lation of Bede, as before of Gildas and of GeofFry of Monmouth : but where architectural or ecclesiological ques- tions are involved, I have transcribed the original in the notes. THE SAXON PERIOD. 27 Mellitus, Justus, Paulinus, and Rufinianus, and by them all things in general that were necessary for the worship and service of the Church, viz. sacred vessels and vestments for the altars, also ornaments for the churches, and vestments for the priests and clerks, as likewise relics of the holy apostles and martyrs ; l be- sides many books. He also sent letters, wherein he signified that he had transmitted the pall to him, and at the same time directed how he should constitute bishops in Britain. 2 Gregory also advised that the heathen temples should be converted into churches, which is the last instance of such a conversion that we shall have to note. Writing to Mellitus, he says, "When Almighty God shall bring you to the most reverend Bishop Augustine, our brother, tell him what I have upon mature deliberation on the affair of the English, determined upon, viz. that the temples of the idols in that nation ought not to be destroyed ; but let the idols that are in them be destroyed : let holy water be made and sprinkled in the said temples, let altars be erected, and relics placed. For if those temples are well built, it is requisite that they be converted from the worship of devils to the service of the true God. And because they have been used to slaughter many oxen in the sacrifices to devils, some solemnity must be exchanged for them on this account; as that on the day of the dedication, or the nativities of the holy martyrs, whose relics are there deposited, they may build themselves huts of the boughs of trees, about those churches which have been turned to that use from temples, 3 and celebrate the solemnity with religious feasting, and no more offer beasts to the devil, but kill cattle to the praise of God in their eating, and return thanks to the Giver of all things for 1 Per eos generaliter universa quse ad cultum erant ac ministerium ec- clesiss necessaria, vasa videlicet sacra, et vestimenta altarium, ornamenta quoque ecclesiarum, et sacerdotalia vel clericalia indumenta, sanctorum etiam apostolorum ac martyrum reli- quias. 2 Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica, i. 29. 3 Fana idolorum destrui in eadem gente minime debeant, sed ipsa quae in eis sunt idola destruantur : aqua bene- dicta fiat, in eisdem fanis aspergatur, altaria construantur, reliquiae ponan- tur ; quia si fana eadem bene con- structa sunt, necesse est ut a cultu dsemonum in obsequio veri Dei com- mutari die dedicationis, vel natalitii S. Martyrum quorum illic reliquiae ponuntur, tabernacula, sibi circa easdem ecclesias quse ex fanis commutatas sunt, de ramis arborum faciant, et religiosis conviviis solemn! - tatem celebrent. 28 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. their sustenance ; to the end that, whilst some gratifications are outwardly permitted them, they may the more easily consent to the inward consolations of the grace of God." 1 Still prosecut- ing his labours, S. Augustine having his episcopal see granted him in the royal city, and being supported by the king, recovered therein a church, which he was informed had been built by the an- cient Roman Christians, and consecrated it in the name of our holy Saviour, God and Lord Jesus Christ, and there estab- lished a residence for himself and his successors. He also built a monastery not far from the city to the eastward, in which, by his advice, Ethelbert erected from the foundation the church of the blessed apostles, Peter and Paul, and enriched it with several do- nations ; wherein the bodies of the same Augustine, and of all the bishops of Canterbury, and of the kings of Kent, might be buried. However, Augustine himself did not consecrate that church, but Laurentius, his successor. 2 After having ordained Justus and Mellitus to the sees of London and Rochester, in both which places Ethelbert built churches, the one dedicated to S. Paul, the other to S. Andrew, Augustine died, and his body was deposited without, close by the church of the apostles, Peter and Paul, above spoken of, by reason that the same was not yet finished, nor consecrated, but as soon as it was dedicated, the body was brought in, and decently buried in the north porch thereof; wherein also were interred the bodies of all the succeeding archbishops, except two only, Theo- dosius and Berthwald, whose bodies are within that church, be- cause the aforesaid porch could contain no more. 3 In this narrative there is much to our present purpose. We have the fact of the existence of S. Martin's Church, erected in the Roman period ; the same, doubtless, with that referred to King Lucius : we have the use of pictures, crosses, and processions, and a character of devotion tending to a noble 1 Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica, i. 30. autem et monasterium non longe ab 2 Recuperavit in ea ecclesiam quam ipsa civitate ad orientem, in quo, ejus inibi antiquo Romanorum fidelium hortatu, iEdilberct ecclesiam B. opere factam fuisse didicerat, et earn Apostolorum Petri et Pauli a funda- nomine Sancti Salvatoris Dei et Do- mentis construxit, ac diversis donis mini nostri Jesu Christi sacravit, ditavit. I. 33. atque ibidem sibi habitationem statuit, 3 Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica, ii. 3. et cunctis successoribus suis. Fecit THE SAXON PERIOD. 29 ceremonial ; all which would lead to the erection of religious edifices in harmony with their form and spirit. We have the rule recognised by which heathen temples, and by parity of reasoning all secular buildings, which might serve this purpose, were converted into Christian churches ; and we have the mention of feasts of dedication, memorials of the sacred destina- tion of the work of the artificer, from which his labour and his skill cannot be dissociated without grievous loss. We have moreover the introduction of coenobitic establishments, which very greatly modified the religious architecture of future ages ; and, last not least, we have the origin of the pre-eminence of Canterbury in all ecclesiastical matters, which rendered it ever after the great centre from which all that was to inform the spirit, or alter the external development of the Church's system, must radiate. S. Martin's first, and then the monastery founded by S. Augustine, and in which he was buried, and at length the cathedral, to which the bones of the first Arch- bishop were eventually carried, are successively objects of inte- rest to the archaeologist, as well as to the general historian, or the Christian student. Ethelbert died in 616, and was buried in S. Martin's porch, in the church of the Apostles SS. Peter and Paul, where Bertha also, his queen, reposes. His son Eadbald was a most unworthy successor to so pious a king, and the Bishops Mellitus and Justus were driven from their sees, by the heavy discouragements which his wickedness brought on the Church. Laurentius, how- ever, remained to lay his bones by those of his predecessor (Feb. 2, a.d. 619) and Mellitus, who had returned to his church, was his successor. Bede relates how the cathedral was saved by his prayers when the city was destroyed by fire, which raged most around the church of the four crowned martyrs. He also died, and was buried beside Augustine and Laurentius, (a.d. 624) each successive Bishop adding to the glories of the metropolitan church by his virtues. But we must leave the southern provinces for a while, and accompany Paulinus on his mission to Edwin, king of Northumbria, which was attended with consequences affording scarcely less interesting subjects of history than the mission of S. Augustine to England. Like Ethelbert, Edwin king of 30 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Northumbria had married a Christian princess, who was the instrument, in the hands of Providence, in preparing the way for the Gospel. The Christian lady was sent only on condition that she might follow the faith of her father with all her retinue; and Paulinus was consecrated to accompany her, (July 21, a.d. 625). The good Bishop was intent on higher espousals than those of Edwin and Edilburga. He was earnestly bent on espousing the nation to which he was sent to one husband, that he might present her as a chaste virgin to Christ. After many incidents, which, interesting as they are, we must pass over as not bearing directly on our subject, King Edwin held a council, at which Coin, the chief of the heathen priests, was the first to recommend that the idols and the temples should be destroyed. Nor was he slow to perform what he had proposed. Having girt a sword about him, with a spear in his hand, he mounted the king's horse, 1 and proceeded to the idols. The multitude beholding it concluded he was distracted; but he lost no time, for as soon as he drew near the temple, he profaned it, casting into it the spear which he held; and rejoicing in the knowledge of the worship of the true God, he commanded his companions to destroy the temple, with all its enclosures, by fire. " This place (says Bede) where the idols were, is still shown, not far from York, to the eastward, beyond the river Derwent, and is now called Godmundingham, where the high- priest, by the inspiration of the true God, profaned and de- stroyed the altars which he had himself consecrated. " King Edwin, therefore, with all the nobility of the nation, and a large number of the common sort, received the faith and the washing of regeneration, in the eleventh year of his reign, which is the year of the Incarnation of our Lord 627, and about one hundred and eighty after the coming of the English into Britain. He was baptized at York, on the holy day of Easter, being the 12th of April, in the church of S. Peter the Apostle, which he himself had built of timber, whilst he was being catechised and instructed in order to receive baptism. In that city also he appointed the see of his instructor Paulinus, and began to build after his directions in the same place a larger 1 Equum emissarium ; non enim licuerat pontificem prseter in equa equi- tare. THE SAXON PERIOD. 31 and nobler church of stone, in the midst whereof that same oratory which he had first erected should be enclosed. Having, therefore, laid the foundation, he began to build the church square, encom- passing the former oratory. But before the wall was raised to the proper height, the wicked assassination of the king left that work to be finished by Oswald his successor." 1 As for Paulinus, he continued for six years, — to the end, that is, of the reign of Edwin, — preaching the word of God, under the protection and countenance of the king, and as many as were ordained to eternal life believed and were baptized, among whom were Osfrid and Eadfrid, sons of King Edwin, whom Quoenburga daughter of Cearli, king of Mercia, had born him in her exile ; and afterwards his other children by Edil- burga the queen, iEdilhun, and his daughter iEdilthryd, and another son named Vuscfrea, the former two of whom, dying in the white garments of their baptism, were buried in the church at York. In the province of the Deiri also, where he was wont often to be with the king, Paulinus baptized in the river Swale, which runs by the village Cataract ; 2 for as yet oratories, or fonts, could not be made in the early infancy of the Church in those parts. But he built a church in Campodonum, 3 which afterwards the pagans, by whom King Edwin was slain, burnt, together with all the town. In the place of which the later kings built them- selves a country-seat in the country called Loidis. 4 But the altar, being of stone, escaped the fire, and is still preserved in the monastery of the most reverend abbot and priest, Thridwulf, which is in Elmete wood. 5 1 Mox autem ut baptisma consecu- tus est, curavit, docente eodem Paul- ino, majorem ipso in loco et augus- tiorem de lapide fabricare basilicam, in cujus medio ipsum quod prius fecerat, oratorium includeretur. Prse- paratis ergo fundamentis in gyro pri- ons oratorii per quadrum csepit edifi- care basilicam. 2 Now Catterick. 3 Perhaps West Tanfield, a place still of great interest for the ecclesiologist. 4 Leeds, in the neighbourhood of which is Elmete Wood. 5 " Baptizabat in fluvio Sualua, qui vicum Cataractam prseterfluit. Non- dum enim oratoria vel baptisteria in ipso exordio nascentis ibi Ecclesise poterant sedificari. Attamen in Cam- podono, ubi tunc etiam villa regia erat, fecit basilicam, quam postmodum pa- gani a quibus iEduini rex occisus, cum tota eadem villa succenderunt : pro qua reges posteriores fecere sibi villam 32 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. In Lincolnshire also the persuasive voice of Paulinus was heard. 1 He first converted the governor of the city of Lincoln, whose name was Blecca, with his whole family. He like- wise built, in that city, a stone church of beautiful workmanship ; the roof of which having either fallen through age, or been thrown down by enemies, the walls are still to be seen stand- ing. 2 We know no better way to give interest to a narrative, which has a natural tendency to become little more than a catalogue of churches and their builders, than the selection of some two or three of the most eminent founders and builders of churches and monasteries, and the mention of their deeds, to the compa- rative exclusion of others. Among such persons the first place is due to S. Columba. He was born of a noble family among the Scots, as a part of the inhabitants of Ireland were then called, about the year 522. After having founded a monastery in his native island, he came over with the spirit of a missionary to the neighbouring shores, and soon produced a great effect on the heathens whom he visited. The island of Hye or Iona was given to him by Bridius, king of the Picts. The present was one which none but a missionary would have accepted. Iona is a barren rock in the midst of a tempestuous sea, surrounded everywhere by vast and dangerous reefs of basalt, which extend probably beneath the bosom of the waves, from the Giant's Causeway, one of the most marvellous scenes in the native land in regione quae vocatur Loidis. Evasit autem ignem altare, quia lapideum erat : et servatur adhuc in monasterio reverentissimi abbatis et presbyteri Thryduulfi, quod est in silva Elmete." 1 A description of the person of so great a missionary as Paulinus must be interesting. Bede tells us that "A cer- tain abbot and priest of the monas- tery of Peartaneu, a man of singular veracity, whose name was Deda, told me that one of the oldest persons had informed him, that he himself had been baptized at noon-day, by the Bishop Paulinus, in the presence of King Edwin, with a great number of the people, in the river Trent, near the city, which in the English tongue is called Tiovulfmgacestir ; and he was also wont to describe the person of the same Paulinus, that he was tall of stature, a little stooping, his hair black, his visage meagre, his nose slender and aquiline, his aspect both venerable and majestic. He had also with him in the ministry, James, the deacon, a man of zerd and great fame in Christ's Church, who lived even to our days/' This James we shall find again in our history engaged in teaching Church music. Bede, Ec. Hist. ii. 16J 2 Bede. THE SAXON PERIOD. 33 of the Saint. FingaPs cave, in the Isle of Staffa, within sight of Iona, is perhaps the most splendid natural object within the British isles — lifting its cathedral-like roof upon giant columns, it mocks the attempts of greater architects than Columba to approach its vast magnificence. But Iona, poor and rugged, with little natural beauty, and absolutely wanting in the ma- jestic features of its neighbour isles, soon became morally and religiously a spectacle as glorious as any that Christendom could afford ; and to this day it has memorials of its past im- portance not to be surpassed in historic interest by the mighty piles of York and Durham, or the halls of Oxford or of Cam- bridge. This little barren spot became the school of what- ever knowledge sacred or profane, was then within the reach of the northern people ; the nursery of many arts, the centre of a Christian colony, and the mother of priests and missionaries. S. Columba himself received the name of Columbkill from the number of oratories or cells that he founded i 1 each one, doubt- less, in size and architectural pretensions such as we should now scarcely class with the hovels of our peasantry ; yet such as his disciples converted, by their pious offices, into gates of paradise ; while a simple and affectionate people loved and admired their inhabitants, and all the visible tokens of their presence, and pledges of their continuance among them. Even as it now ex- ists after the additions of many centuries in more advanced styles of art, the ruins of Iona do not afford traces of any great mag- nificence : but it is otherwise with many of its daughters, in a less barren country. The most important of these is the religi- ous establishment at Lindisfarne, which yields to none in the interest of its origin, and in the importance of its influence on the church of Northumbria, and to few in the splendour of its architecture. Oswald, saint, king, and martyr, was the second son of Ethelfrith, king of Northumbria, and with his mother Acca, and his two brothers, was brought up in the Christian faith by Donald III. of Scotland, in whose court they found an asylum from the violence of their uncle the usurper Edwin. Oswald 1 " Qui videlicet Columba nunc a nonnullis composite- a Cella et Columba nomine Columcelli vocatur.'' D 34 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. alone retained the faith, though secretly for a while, and to it he owed his crown, after both his brothers had been cut off. Cedwell, king of Cumbria, had ravaged Northumbria, and nearly brought it into subjection, when Oswald, raising the cross as a banner, 1 and having first prayed to the Lord of hosts, led his little army to the battle, and obtained a com- plete victory. However desirous Oswald might be of founding a church in his dominions, he could not effect his pious purpose without the aid of a consecrated missionary ; and Aidan and Einan were suc- cessively sent from Iona to his court. Aidan selected Lindisfarne as the site of a religious establishment, which Finan enriched with a church, which became the cathedral church of his diocese. Notwithstanding, however, the use of stone in building, which we have already noted, this church was erected after the manner of the Scots, of split wood, and was covered with reed-thatch. But Eadberct, bishop of the same see, removed the reeds, and covered it entirely with sheets of lead. 2 To this age and district belong the four illustrious brothers Cedd and Cynebil, Celin and Ceadda or Chadd, two of whom came to be bishops. The account which Bede gives of the foundation of Lastingham by the first of these, affords a deep insight into the spirit of church builders in those days. " Ethelwald, the son of King Oswald, who reigned among the Deiri, finding him a holy, wise, and good man, desired him to accept some land to build a monastery, to which the king himself might frequently resort to offer his prayers and hear the word, and be buried in it when he died ; for he believed that he should receive much benefit by the prayers of those who were to serve God in that place. That prelate, therefore, complying with the king's desires, chose himself a place to build a monastery among 1 Bede says, " There was no sign of the Christian faith, no church, no altar erected throughout all the nation of the Bernicians, before that new com- mander of the army, prompted by the devotion of his faith, set up the same as he was going to give battle to his barbarous enemy." — Bede, Ecc. Hist, iii. 3. 2 In insula Lindisfarnensi fecit eccle- siam episcopali sedi congruam ; quam tamen more Scottorum, non de lapide, sed de robore secto totam composuit, atque arundine texit, quam tempore se- quenti reverentissimus archiepiscopus Theodorus in honore beati apostoli Petri dedicavit. Sed episcopus loci ipsius Eadberct ablata arundine, plumbi laminis earn totam, hoc est, et tectum et ipsos quoque parietes ejus, cooperire curavit. THE SAXON PERIOD. 35 craggy and distant mountains, which looked more like lurking-places for robbers and retreats for wild beasts, than habitations for men ; to the end that according to the prophecy of Isaiah, ' in the habitations where before dragons dwelt, might be grass with reeds and rushes ;' that is, that the fruits of good works should spring up, where before beasts were wont to dwell, or men to live after the manner of beasts. The man of God, desiring first to cleanse the place for the monastery from former crimes, by prayer and fasting, that it might become acceptable to our Lord, and so to lay the foundations, requested of the king that he would give him leave to reside there all the approaching time of Lent, to pray; all which days except of Sundays, he fasted till the evening, according to custom, and then took no other sustenance than a little bread, one hen's egg, and a little milk mixed with water. This, he said, was the custom of those of whom he had learned the rule of regular discipline; first, to con- secrate to our Lord, by prayer and fasting, the places which they had newly received for building a monastery or a church. When there were ten days of Lent still remaining, there came a messenger to call him to the king ; and he, that the religious work might not be intermitted on account of the king's affairs entreated his priest, Cynebil, who was also his own brother, to complete that which had been so piously begun. Cynebil readily complied, and when the time of fasting and prayer was over, lie there built the monastery, which is now called Lestingaw, and established therein the religious customs of Lindisfarne, where they had been edu- cated. " Cedd for many years having charge of the bishopric, and of this monastery, over which he had placed superiors, came thither at a time when there was a mortality, and fell sick and died. He was first buried in the open air, but in the process of time a church was built of stone in the monastery, in honour of the mother of God, and his body interred in the same on the right hand of the altar." 1 Not unlike in spirit is the erection of a cell in Fame Island, by the still more illustrious S. Cuthbert. For reasons which will presently appear, I shall give Mr. Petrie's rendering of Bede's description of the cell and oratory, transcribing the ori- ginal in a note. " Such also (as the more ancient Irish cells,) or very nearly, appears to have been the monastic establishment constructed on the Island of Fame, in Northumberland, in the year 684, by S. Cuthbert, Bishop of Lindisfarne, who is usually reputed to have been an Irishman, and, at all events, received i " Primoquidem foris sepultus est ; et in ilia corpus ipsius ad dextram tempore autera procedente, in eodem altaris reconditum." — Bede, Ecc. Hist, monasterio ecclesia est in honorem iii. 23. beatae Dei genitricis de lapide facta, D 2 36 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. his education from Irish ecclesiastics. This monastery, as de- scribed by Venerable Bede in the seventeenth chapter of his Life of that distinguished saint, was almost of a round form, four or five perches in diameter from wall to wall. This wall was on the outside of the height of a man, but was on the in- side made higher by sinking the natural rock, to prevent the thoughts from rambling by restraining the sight to the view of the heavens only. It was not formed of cut stone, or brick ce- mented with mortar, but wholly of rough stones and earth, which had been dug up from the middle of the enclosure ; and of these stones, which had been carried from another place, some were so large that four men could scarcely lift one of them. Within the enclosure were two houses, of which one was an ora- tory, or small chapel, and the other for the common uses of a habitation ; and of these the walls were in great part formed by digging away the earth inside and outside, and the roofs were made of unhewn timber thatched with hay. Outside the en- closure, and at the entrance to the island, was a larger house for the accommodation of religious visitors, and not far from it a fountain of water." 1 Cells of this kind were, so far as we have positive evidence, almost confined to the Scoti, or Irish, and the churches derived from them ; but in Ireland they existed at one time in great 1 .... " Condidit ciuitatem suo ap- tam imperio, et domus in hac asque ciuitati congruas erexit. Est autem sedificium situ pene rotundum, a muro usque ad mururu mensura quatuor ferme siue quinque perticarum disten- tura, murus ipse deforis altior longi- tudiue stantis hominis. Nam intrin- secus viuam cedendo rupem multo fecit altiorem, quatenus ad cobiben- dam oculorum siue cogitationem lasciuiam, ad erigendam in suprema desideria totam mentis intentionem, pius incola nil de sua mansione prseter coelum posset intueri : quern videlicet murum non de secto lapide vel latere et csemento, sed impolitis prorsus la- pidibus et cespite, quern de medio loci fodiendo tulerat, composuit. E quibus quidam tantse erant granditatis, vt vix a quatuor viris viderentur potuisse leuari : quos tamen ipse angelico adiutus auxilio illuc attulisse aliunde et muro imposuisse repertus est. — Duas in mansione babebat domos, oratorium scilicet et aliud ad com- munes usus aptum habitaculum : quo- rum parietes quidem de naturali terra multum intus forisque circum- fodiendo siue cedendo confecit, cul- mina vero de lignis informibus et fceno superposuit. Porro ad portam insulse maior erat domus, in qua visi- tantes eum fratres suscipi et quiescere possent ; nec longe ab ea fons eorun- dem usibus accommodus." — Vita S. Cuthberti, apud Colgan, Acta SS., p. 667. THE SAXON PERIOD. 37 numbers, being constantly erected for themselves or their com- panions, wherever the greater saints of these people dwelt. They were doubtless brought to Iona, and thence to Northum- bria and the neighbouring coasts and islands, by monks either themselves Irish, or spiritually speaking of Irish descent ; and among these Cuthbert holds a very prominent place. Whether it is to be attributed to the greater reverence in which they have been held in Ireland, or to the more pertinacious adherence to ancient forms in the natives of that island, or to the compara- tive infrequency of finer structures displacing the rude cells and oratories of primitive recluses, certain it is, that whereas there is not a trace of such a fabric in England, there are still many in Ireland, to which the above description will apply in its gene- ral features ; and the enumeration of these, with the vindication of their right to be classed among the oldest memorials of the faith in any Christian nation, forms one of the most interesting portions of Mr. Petrie's volume on the origin and use of round towers in Ireland. One who will take the pains to study the descriptions in that volume, with reference to the admirable illustrations, will know more of the history and character of a class of buildings of a very remote age, and now only of archaeo- logical interest, than many a one has of the churches still remaining, and still the resort of worshippers within sight of his own home. To an era illustrated by such worthy names, and to the cen- tury immediately succeeding, must be referred the foundation of many other monastic establishments, which were then among the most splendid buildings of the age, and which, receiving with successive generations their share of enrichments and en- largement, still held their place among the magnificent churches of England till the dissolution. We shall mention but very few of those instances, in which there is something of interest in the founders, as well as in the foundations. The first place is due to Benedict Biscop, and his two monasteries of Wear- mouth and Jarrow. 1 ' Bede, in his Lives of the holy Dr. Giles' translation is still used, Abbots of Wearmouth and Jairow, except in one or two places where supplies all the materials here ; and architectural terms are in question. 38 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. " The pious servant of Christ, Biscop, called Benedict, with the assist- ance of the Divine grace, built [a.d. 671] a monastery in honour of the most holy of the Apostles, S. Peter, near the mouth of the river Were, on the north side. The venerable and devout king of that nation, Egfrid, contributed the land ; and Biscop, for the space of sixteen years, amid innumerable perils in journeying and in illness, ruled this monastery with the same piety which stirred him up to build it. " After the interval of a year, from the foundation of the monastery, Benedict crossed the sea into Gaul, and no sooner asked than he obtained and carried back with him some masons to build him a church of stone in the Roman style, which he had always admired. Camentarios, qui lapi- deam sibi ecclesiam juxta Romanorum, quern semper amabat, morem facerent, postulavit, accepit, attulit. So much zeal did he show from his love to Saint Peter, in whose honour he was building it, that within a year from the time of laying the foundation, you might have seen the roof on culminibus superpositis, and the solemnity of the mass celebrated therein. When the work was drawing to completion, he sent messengers to Gaul to fetch makers of glass, (more properly arti- ficers,) who were at this time unknown in Britain, that they might glaze the windows of his church, with the cloisters and dining-rooms. This was done, and they came, and not only finished the work required, but taught the English nation their handicraft, which was well adapted for enclosing the lanterns of the church, and for the vessels required for various uses. All other things necessary for the service of the church and the altar, the sacred vessels, and the vestments, because they could not be procured in England, he took especial care to buy and bring home from foreign parts. 1 " Some decorations and monuments there were which could not be pro- cured even in Gaul, and these the pious founder determined to fetch from Rome ; for which purpose, after he had formed the rule for his monastery, he made his fourth voyage to Rome, and returned loaded with more abundant spiritual merchandise than before. In the first place, he brought back a large quantity of books of all kinds ; secondly, a great number of relics of Christ's Apostles and Martyrs, all likely to bring a blessing on many an English church ; thirdly, he introduced the Roman mode of chanting, singing, and ministering in the church, by obtaining permission from Pope Agatho to take back with him John, the archchanter of the church of S. Peter, and abbot of the monastery of S. Martin, to teach the 1 Proximante autem ad perfectum opere, misit legatarios Galliam, qui vitri factores, (artifices videlicet,) Britanniis eatenus incognitos, ad cancellandas ecclesiee, porticuumque et caenaculorum ejus, fenestras addu- cerent. Factumque est, venerunt ; nec solum opus postulatum compleverunt, sed et Anglorum ex eo gentem hu- jusmodi artificium nosse ac discere claustris, vel vasorum multifariis usibus, non ignobiliter aptum. Sed et cuncta, quae ad altaris et ecclesise ministerium competebant, vasa sancta, vel vestimenta, quia domi invenire non potuit, de transmarinis regionibus advectare religiosus emptor curabat. THE SAXON PERIOD. 39 English. This John, when he arrived in England, not only communicated instruction by teaching personally, but left behind him numerous writings, which are still preserved in the library of the same monastery. In the fourth place, Benedict brought with him a thing by no means to be des- pised, namely, a letter of privilege from Pope Agatho, which he had pro- cured, not only with the consent, but by the request and exhortation, of King Egfrid, and by which the monastery was rendered safe and secure for ever from foreign invasion. Fifthly, he brought with him pictures of sacred representations, to adorn the church of S. Peter, which he had built : namely, a likeness of the Virgin Mary and of the Twelve Apostles, with which he intended to adorn the central nave, on boarding placed from one wall to the other ; also some figures from ecclesiastical history for the south wall, and others from the Revelation of S. John for the north wall j 1 so that every one who entered the church, even if they could not read, wherever they turned their eyes, might have before them the amiable countenance of Christ and His Saints, though it were but in a picture, and with watchful minds might revolve on the benefits of our Lord's in- carnation, and having before their eyes the perils of the last judgment, might examine their hearts the more strictly on that account. "Thus King Egfrid, delighted by the virtues and zealous piety of the venerable Benedict, augmented the territory which he had given, on which to build this monastery, by a further grant of land of forty hides ; on which, at the end of a year, Benedict by the same King Egfrid's con- currence, and indeed, command, built the monastery of the Apostle S. Paul.2 " When Benedict had made Easterwine abbot of S. Peter's, and Ceol- frid abbot of S. Paul's, he made his fifth voyage from Britain to Rome, and returned (as usual) with an immense number of books and pictures of the saints, as numerous as before. He also brought with him pictures out of our Lord's history, which he hung round the chapel of our Lady in the larger monastery ; and others to adorn S. Paul's church and monastery, ably describing the connection of the Old and New Testament ; as, for 1 Picturas imaginum sanctarum, quas ad ornandum ecclesiam beati Petri Apostoli, quam construxerat, detulit ; imaginem, videlicet, beatse Dei Genetricis semperque virginis Marise, simul et duodecim Aposto- lomm, quibus mediam ejusdem ec- clesise testudinem, ducto, a pariete ad parietem tabulate, prsecingeret ; imagines evangelicse historian, quibus australem ecclesise parietem decora - ret ; imagines visionum Apocalypsis beati Johannis, quibus septentriona- lem seque parietem ornaret, quatenus intrantes ecclesiam omnes, etiam li- ter arum ignari, quaquaversum inten- derent, vel semper amabilem Christi sanctorumque ejus, quamvis in ima- gine, contemplarentur aspectum ; vel Dominicse incarnationis gratiam vigi- lantiore mente recolerent ; vel ex- tremi discrimen examinis quasi coram oculis habentes, districtius se ipsi exa- minare meminissent. 2 This was the Monastery at Jai row, in which the Venerable Bede who has supplied so great a portion of our his- tory, lived and died. 40 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. instance, Isaac bearing the wood for his own sacrifice, and Christ carry- ing the cross on which He was about to suffer, were placed side by side. Again, the serpent raised up by Moses in the desert, was illustrated by the Son of Man exalted on the cross. Among other things, he brought two cloaks, all of silk, and of incomparable workmanship, for which he received an estate of three hides on the south bank of the river Were, near its mouth, from King Alfrid, for he found on his return that Egfrid had been murdered during his absence. 1 " In the sixteenth year after he built the monastery, the holy confessor found rest in the Lord, on the 14th day of January, in the church of S. Peter ; and thus, as he had loved that holy Apostle in his life, and ob- tained from him admission into the heavenly kingdom, so also after death he rested hard by his relics, and his altar, even in the body. 2 The importance of Benedict Biscop's contributions to the architecture of England must not be estimated by the extent of the monasteries of Wearmouth and Jarrow in their palmiest days, still less in their first beginnings. What we have chiefly to observe is, that he seems to have given a stimulus to improve- ment of a definite kind, and to have carried to a very consider- i Ecclesiasticorum donis commodo- rum locupletatus rediit ; magna qui- dem copia voluminum sacrorum, sed non minori (sicut et prius) sanctarum imaginum munere ditatus. Nam et tunc Divinse historise picturas, quibus totam beatse Dei Genetricis, quam in monasterio majore fecerat, ecclesiam in gyro coronaret, attulit ; imagines quoque ad ornandum monasterium ec- clesiamque beati Pauli Apostoli, de concordia Veteris et Novi Testamenti summa ratione compositas, exhibuit ; verbi gratia, Isaac ligna, quibus immo- laretur, portantem, et Dominum cru- cem, in qua pateretur, seque portan- tem proxima super invicem regione, pictura conjunxit. Item, serpenti in eremo a Moyse exaltato, Filium ho- minis in cruce exaltatum comparavit. Attulit inter alia, et pallia duo holo- serica incomparandi operis, quibus postea ab Alfrido rege ej usque eonsi- liariis, namque Egfridum postquam rediit jam interfectum reperit, terrain trium familiarum ad austrum Wiri fluminis juxta ostium, comparavit. 2 Ceolfrid, the successor of Bene- dict, with the advice and assistance of Benedict, founded, completed, and ruled the monastery of S. Paul seven years ; and, afterwards, ably governed, during twenty-eight years, both these monasteries ; or, to speak more cor- rectly, the single monastery of S. Peter and S. Paul, in its two separate localities ; and, whatever works of merit his predecessor had begun, he, with no less zeal, took pains to finish. Among other arrangements which he found it necessary to make, he built several oratories ; increased the num- ber of vessels of the church and altar, and the vestments of every kind ; plura fecit oratoria : altaris et ecclesia vasa, vel vestimenta omnis generis ampliavit : and the library of both mo- nasteries, which Abbot Benedict had so actively begun, under his equally zealous care became doubled in extent. THE SAXON PERIOD. 41 able extent that very happy method of borrowing from other nations the skill and science in which they excelled his own countrymen, to which we have owed so much ever since his time. The importance of the introduction of glass we shall have occasion to notice by and bye. The use of pictures and images also, however much it may have been abused in after ages, must be allowed to have greatly and most beneficially influenced ecclesiastical architecture, viewed merely as an art; the images brought from abroad by Benedict must not be dis- connected in our minds from the glorious west front of Wells, or the exquisite statuary in the Queen's crosses at Waltham, at Geddington, and at Northampton. But the most important of the benefits which Biscop conferred on the ecclesiastical architecture of his country is perhaps summed up in the few and somewhat obscure words, ccementarios, qui lapideam sibi ecclesiam juxta Romanorum morem facerent attulit. By some it has been inferred from this passage, that Benedict Biscop first introduced stone 1 as a building material, and that this was the Roman fashion which he so greatly valued ; but this notion is entirely exploded, and it is only strange that it could ever have existed, when there is frequent mention of stone churches before his time. Nor can it well be supposed that the manner of the masonry can be intended, for if ccementarii be taken for building in any peculiar fashion, it is rather with the lower than with the higher charac- ter of building that their name is connected, ccementum being a mass of unwrought rag or rubble, roughly imbedded in the mortar, and ccementarii the masons who build with such primi- tive materials. The introduction of the arch of that form which is still called Romanesque, may be supposed to satisfy the phrase juxta Romanorum morem, but it is difficult to believe that this was unusual before this time, when we remember that there 1 It may seem at first sight a con- firmation of this notion that building with wood is expressly called by Bede the manner of the Scots. Finan fecit ecclesiam . . . quam more Scottorum, non de lapide, sed de robore secto totam composuit. III. cap. xxv. But we are told by Mr. Petrie that before this time the Scoti, i.e., the Irish certainly built sometimes with stone ; and besides, if it was necessary to distinguish between the usual Saxon building and that which was of wood, by giving to the latter another name, we should infer that the Saxons did not generally use wood in building their churches. 42 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. were already Roman arches in abundance in the kingdom, and that the inhabitants of Great Britain could hardly have forgotten the art of constructing them, which they had learned during their subjection to the empire. Perhaps the difference of fashion thus expressed may be, at least partly, ritual, and alto- gether rather of degree than of kind. Thus, although the arch may have been already used in doors and windows, and between the nave and chancel ; yet if aisles were now introduced, after an arrangement forced on the Romans by the form of the ancient Basilica, and afterwards adopted by them for ritual pur- poses, the use of the arch would be greatly multiplied, and the church be better adapted for the processions in which a body of ecclesiastics would often be engaged. Again, the apse may, probably at least, have been introduced from Rome at this time : and the habit of departing from the very scanty proportions of early Saxon churches may have originated with the more fre- quent pilgrimages to Rome of our Saxon ecclesiastics, and with the introduction of Roman artificers into England. At all events, we shall see all these features distinctly marked in the church at Hexham built by Wilfrid, who was a great traveller, as well as Benedict Biscop, and more than equally wedded to Roman fashions. 1 The erection of this church is thus related by Eddius, 2 Wil- frid's contemporary. Having obtained of Queen Ethel drida, who was herself dedicated to the Lord, a region in Hexham, he there founded a church in honour of the blessed Apostle An- drew. Nor can I pretend, says Eddius, in the poverty of my language, to describe the depth of its foundation, with its cham- bers of stone marvellously wrought ; and above the ground the intricacy of the fabric propped with various pillars and porticos, adorned with a marvellous length and height of walls, and with passages of various turnings, winding sometimes upward, and sometimes downward, and carried through spiral stairs : and all this that holy Bishop of souls designed to perform taught by the Spirit of God : nor was it ever heard that such another 1 Mr. Bloxam considers some such only characteristic features are rude portions of the more ancient parts of round-headed windows, with some the churches of Wearmouth and Jarrow long and short work in the jambs, to be relics of Biscop's building. The 2 See also Bede, Ecc. Hist. v. 20. THE SAXON PERIOD. 43 church was erected on this side the Alps. And besides this, who can venture to relate how Bishop Acca still by God's grace among the living, has adorned the same church with various ornaments of gold and silver and precious stones, and has clothed the altars with purple and silk hangings. 1 Another, though an indirect testimony to the height of the church, appears in the next section, which relates how a youth was cured, who fell from an exceeding high wing of the church to the stone pavement, and there lay with his arms and legs broken. 2 But the most valuable testimony to the splendour of this effort of the eighth century, is the description of it by Richard, prior of the same church, at the close of the twelfth century, when the Normans had taught us to despise most of the works of our Saxon ancestors. " S. Wilfrid laid the foundation of this church, deep in the earth, with great care, forming crypts and subterraneous oratories, and winding pas- sages. The walls, extending to a great length, and raised to a great height, were divided into three distinct stories, supported by polished columns, some square, and others of various forms. The walls, and also the capitals of the columns, by which they were supported, and the arch of the sanctuary were decorated with histories and images, and different figures carved in relief, on stone, and painted with colours displaying a pleasing variety and wonderful beauty. The body of the church was like- wise surrounded on all sides by pentices and porticos, [apses ?] 3 which, with the most wonderful artifice, were divided above and below by walls and winding stairs. Within these winding passages, and over them were 1 " In Hagustaldense adepta regione a Regina iEthildrite Domino dedicata, donmm Domino in honorem beati Andreee Apostoli fabrefactam fun davit : cujus profunditatem in terra cum domibus mirifice politis lapidibus fun- datam, et super terram multiplicem domum columnis variis et porticibus multis suffultam, mirabilique longitu- dine et altitudine murorum ornatam, et variis linearum circumductam, non est mese parvitatis hoc sermone explicare, quod sanctus ipse Prsesul animarum, a Spiritu Dei doctus, opere facere excogitavit : neque ullum do- mum aliam citra Alpes montes talem sedificatam audivimus. Porro beatse memorise adhuc vivens gratia Domini Acca Episcopus, qui magnalia orna- menta hujus multiplicis domus deauro et argento lapidibusque pretiosis, et quomodo altaria purpura et serico in- duta decoravit, quis ad explanandum sufficere poterat ?" — Eddius, inMabil- lon, v. 646. 2 " Cum sedificantes namque cee- mentarii murorum hujus domus alti- tudines, quidam juvenis ex servis Dei, de pinna enormis proceritatis elapsus ad terram, deorsum cadens in pavi- mentum lapideum, illisus cecidit, con- fracta sunt crura et brachial' — Eddius in Mabillon, v. 647. 3 For the meaning of tbe word Por- ticus, see Willis' Canterbury Cathe- dral, p. 39. 44 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. stairs and galleries of stone, and various ways for ascending and descend- ing, so ingeniously contrived that a vast multitude of persons might be there, and pass round the church, without being visible to any one in the nave below. Many oratories, also, most retired and beautiful, were, with the utmost care and diligence, erected in the porticos, [apses ?] both above and below ; and in them were placed altars in honour of the blessed Mother of God, the Virgin Mary, S. Michael the Archangel, S. John the Baptist, and the holy Apostles, Martyrs, Confessors, and Virgins, with all becoming and proper furniture belonging to them. Some parts of this building, even to this day, remain standing like turrets and fortified places." 1 Wilfrid was made Bishop of York in 669, and retained the see, with some intervals, into the causes of which we shall not here enter, till 691. When he came to his church in the reign of King Edwy, he found the very stone walls half ruined ; the roofs, already grown old, let in the water ; the windows were open ; birds built their nests in the church, and the walls were contaminated with their filth, and with the stains of the wea- ther : all which, when the holy Bishop saw, according to the words of Daniel, his spirit was grieved within him, because he found the house of God and of prayer, converted as it were into a den of thieves, and he presently determined on restoring it, according to the will of God. First of all he repaired the roof, skilfully covering it with sheets of lead : he shut out the weather and the birds, without impeding the light, by glazing the win- dows. He washed the walls, and made them as the Prophet speaks, whiter than snow. Moreover, he not only adorned the house of God and the altar with rich furniture, but he acquired also many estates with which he enriched it, and so converted its poverty of worldly goods into abundance. 2 This passage is perhaps more interesting from the light which it throws on the 1 This extract is given from Britton. 2 Igitur supradicto Rege regnante, beatse memoriae Wilfrido Episcopo Metropolitan© Eboracae civitatis con- stitute, Basilicas oratorii Dei, in ea civitate a sancto Paulino Episcopo in diebus olim Eadwini Christianissimi Regis primo fundatae, et dedicatee Deo, officia semiruta lapidea eminebant. Nam culmina antiquata tecti distillan - tia, fenestraeque apertae, avibus nidifi- cantibus intro, et foras volitantibus, et parietes incultae, omni spurcitia imbrium, et avium, horribiles mane- bant. Videns itaque haec omnia sanctus Pontifex noster secundum Prophetam Danielem, horruit spiritus ejus, in eo quod domus Dei et ora- tionis quasi speluncam latronum fac- tam agnovit, et mox juxta voluntatem Dei emendare excogitavit, primum culmina corrupta tecti renovans, arti- THE SAXON PERIOD. 45 resources of the ecclesiastical architect of that day, than for any- additional information which it gives us of the fabric of the church at York in particular. We find the use of glass and of lead thus early introduced ; and probably of lime, in the form of whitewash, for nothing besides would be described by the terms lavans super nivem dealbavit. Besides building the church at Hexham, and restoring that at York, Wilfrid founded the church at Ripon, a work which Eddius duly commemorates in the passage given below. 1 This church he dedicated to S. Peter, and these pious acts were not unrecorded, according to the historian, in the book of God's re- membrance ; for when Wilfrid lay sick at Meldum, in his return from Rome, and expecting his death, the Archangel Michael appeared to him, promising him, at the impetration of the Blessed Virgin, an addition of four years to his life, and adding, " Thou hast dedicated churches to S. Peter and to S. Andrew, but to the ever Virgin Mary, who intercedes for thee, thou hast dedicated no church : thou hast to amend this thy neglect, and to build a church to her also." 2 Or as Fridegodus relates the message of the angel in a metrical legend : — " Surgito concivis, nostri non portio vilis: Et licet astricolas inter numerere catervas, ficiose plumbo puro tegens, per fenes- tras introitum avium et imbrium vitro prohibuit, per quod tamen intro lumen radiebat. Parietes quoque lavans secundum Prophetam, super nivem dealbavit, earn enim non solum do- mum Dei, et altare, in varia supel- lectili vasorum intus ornavit, verum etiam deforis multa territoria pro Deo adeptus, terrenis opibus paupertatem auferens copiose ditavit. 1 " Crescebat ergo cum seculari sumptu, Deo donante, Pontifici nos- tro, amico Sponsi iEternalis, magis ac magis ardentissimus amor sponsae virginis uni viro desponsatse, de matre omnium bonorum progenitse : quam discipline moribus quasi floribus vir- tutum, castam et pudicam, continen- tem et modestam, circumamictam varietate, subjectam pulchre adorna- vit, secundum Prophetam, Omnis gloria filice Regis ab intus. Sicut enim Moyses tabernaculum seculare manu factum, ad exemplar in monte monstratum a Deo, ad concitandam Israelitico populo cultural Dei fidem, distinctis variis coloribus Eedificavit : ita vero beatissimus Wilfridus Epis- copus thalamum veri sponsi et sponsse, in conspectu populorum corde creden- tium et fide confitentium, auro, et ar- gento, purpuraque varia mirifice deco- ravit : nam in Hrypis Basilicam polito lapide a fundamentis in terra usque ad summum eedificatam, variis columnis et porticibus suffultam in altum erexit, et consummavit." 2 Eddius, liii. 46 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Inquit, ab orbatis jam nunc revocaberis agnis. Postquam bis binis fratres solidaveris annis ; Cum mercede bona temet revocabo, sed insta Christotochse dignas cedes fabricare Mariae : Cujus amore tibi cumulantur certius anni. Novit quid Petro, Petri quid solvis adelpho." 1 Notwithstanding this warning, it does not seem that Wilfrid added a church to the Blessed Virgin to his other foundations. He was buried at Ripon; and Bede gives his epitaph, which begins thus : — " Vilfridus hie magnus requiescit corpore prsesul, Hanc Domini qui aulam ductus pietatis amore Fecit, et eximio sacravit nomine Petri." The brethren of the church where he reposed believed that they were the safer for his tutelar care ; a belief which was con- firmed by a sign in the heavens, which I relate as a most striking instance of that very rare and impressive phenomenon, the lunar rainbow. For when many Abbots and Bishops, and the whole household, were assembled at the festival of the departed Prelate, after supper, in the evening twilight, when they had gone out to the service of compline, they saw a wonderful sign in the heavens ; a white circle, like a rainbow, as it appears in the day, but without its various colours. It seemed to spring from the church dedicated to S. Peter, near to where the body of the Bishop rested, and it encircled the whole monastery. The religious who saw the sign blessed the Lord, understanding that thenceforth there was a wall of Divine help surrounding the chosen vineyard of the family of the Lord. 2 "Hesperus aeriis sed jam densaverat umbras, Pernox cura fratrum cum ccelum respicit altum. Emicuit ciclus tenebrosa per astra coruscus, Ceu matutinos igniret Phosphorus ortus. Canduit hie radius Monachum Camobia circum Officiose, vias visus liquisse polinas. Hinc patuit, Domini quia constat vinea firmis Oratu Wilfridi aavum stabilita gigantis." 3 1 Mabillon, 679. 2 See Eddius, lxiv. 3 Mabillon, 682. THE SAXON PERIOD. 47 Let us place this account at the lowest, and without assuming that there was a revelation of God's purpose, in this " bow in the cloud/' still this is a most impressive passage. The proces- sion of Abbots and brethren moving towards the church for compline, the bright circle, rising as from the grave of the de- parted Bishop, and like a crown of glory overarching the whole fabric which calls him its founder, and the shouts of joy and the ascriptions of praise to God, for what is accepted by all as a sign of promised protection : this is a scene worthy to grace the festival of a founder of churches. With Wilfrid we may fairly leave this portion of our history, for there is little reason to suppose that any additions were made to the resources of the ecclesiastical architect, or any greater stimulus given to their employment, until the introduction of the Benedictine Order into England by Dunstan. We may add that portions of the present crypts of York and Bipon are attri- buted to Wilfrid. 1 1 See a paper by Mr. Turner, in No. York volume of the Transactions of VII. of theArchseologicalJournal ; and the Archaeological Institute, another paper by Mr. Waltham in the 48 CHAPTER IV. The Saxon Period. From the Birth of Dunstan to Edward the Confessor. dunstan introduces the benedictine rule into england, and rebuilds Glastonbury with increased splendour. — Oswald Bishop of Worcester. — Ramsey Abbey, and Worcester. — Ad- helm, Founder of Malmsbury Abbey. — Miracles connected with the erection of churches. — restoration of churches after Danish Invasion. — Croyland, Kirkdale. We now arrive at another marked era of church building. We have seen the introduction of a Caenobitic system followed everywhere by the erection of churches and monasteries, the most splendid buildings of their day : but in the middle of the tenth century, English monachism assumed a more regular form, and made, in consequence, very rapid advances, both in the number of its votaries and in all external indications of its wealth and greatness. S. Dunstan may be called the second founder of the mon- astic system in England, and his character, full of the aesthetic element, would not let him neglect the beauty of the sanctuary; while his pursuits and varied acquirements rendered him every way capable of taking part even in the minutest details of the movement which he was originating. This extraordinary man 1 was born in the neighbourhood of Glastonbury, about the year 925. His parents were noble by birth, and still more noble, as Christians ought to be, by their piety. He was a sickly child, 2 but his active spirit was not 1 The authority generally followed here, is the life of Dunstan by Osbern, published in Wharton's Anglia Sacra. 2 " Mulier genuit filiura, quantitate quidcm corporis parvulum, sed ea qua praeventus fuerat gratia Dei imnien- suiu.'' His future history is evidently coloured by the excitability of a deli- cate frame, acted upon by an ardent spirit. THE SAXON PERIOD. 49 weighed down by the infirmities of nature. The usual charac- ter of monkish histories leads us to expect an account of divine presages of his greatness, and we have one which cannot be omitted here; for the heavenly visitant, who reveals the future greatness of the youth, appears almost literally in the character of an Ecclesiastical Architect, revealing the architypal form of a church. His parents brought him to Glastonbury, already venerable for its ancient associations. 1 Here, while they were watching all night in prayer, a man appeared to them of a hea- venly aspect, who told them that the splendour of the place should, after a short time, be greatly increased, and bid them leave their boy there, foretelling his future beatification. Then stretching a surveyor's measuring line over the precincts of the church : 2 " After this fashion," said he, " shall a place be erected, for the religious profit of those who shall hereafter believe in God, through this youth." Glastonbury was a noted school of such learning as the times afforded, under the charge of certain Irish priests ; and there Dunstan, giving himself more diligently to his studies than his years and his tender frame would bear, brought on a dangerous illness, accompanied with delirium. His sad associates were beginning to think of the funeral obsequies of their beloved pupil, when Christ Himself administered a remedy by the hands of an angel. Dunstan by the guidance of the heavenly visitant, arose and proceeded at once to the church, to return 1 "The celebrated abbey of Glas- tonbury was probably a Welch monas- tery before King Ina of Wessex, at the close of the seventh century, took Somerset from the Welch, and raised his own great foundation there. There seems no reason to doubt that King Arthur was buried in the island of Avalon, or Ynis-vitryn, ' the glassy island,' as it was called by the Welch, being surrounded at that time with a wide lake of still water, before the streams that encircle it were confined to their banks ; and here there was a church founded by the Saxons, built as they sometimes built their churches, of that kind of stud -building still in use in many parts of the country, where it has not given way to brick or stone. In all likelihood the Britons had a monastery here, for at such places their princes were buried ; and what- ever may be thought of S. Patrick's coming to Glastonbury to die, and of the legend about Joseph of Arimathea, the tomb of Arthur, discovered in Henry II.' s reign, is a strong proof of the ancient religion of the place,'' — Churton's Early English Church, p. 102. 2 " Mensoris funiculum per plana atrii extendens." 50 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. thanks for the blessing he had received. His attendants, as- tonished at what was taking place, followed at a little distance to see the end. The devil, envious of his restored health, and fearing his future influence, beset him in his way accompanied with a pack of howling dogs; the youth calling on Christ, seized a staff which he brandished in the face of his opponent, and so, still attended by the angel, arrived at the church. Find- ing the door bolted, he mounted the stairs which led to the roof, 1 and going thence to another part of the building from which there was no means of descent, he was gently let down upon the pavement by the anger's hands. In the morning he was found among the brethren who were keeping their nocturns, fallen into a gentle sleep, and unable to satisfy the curiosity of those who asked him about the events of the night. His fame was now so widely extended, that many of both sexes crowded to see him ; but the more his praises were sounded, the more apparent did his humility become. But it is more immediately to our purpose to record his pro- ficiency in those arts and sciences which are secular in them- selves, though capable of receiving a religious direction in the hands of a Christian. He was learned beyond all his fellows in philosophy, and was soon wonderfully skilled in manual opera- tions. He was a painter and a scribe ; and we have still proofs remaining of his proficiency in these arts. He was, besides, a diligent and skilful artificer in gold, silver, brass, and iron, and used the more delicate gravers' tools, as well as the hammer and the tongs ; but most of all he delighted not only in the prac- tice, but in the science of music, and in the making of musical instruments. 2 Miracles are brought to attest his skill in these 1 Scalam cui inniti solebant qui and then lightly descended, on angel superiora templi sarciebant. The pinions, to the floor, present church of Brixworth, which 2 William of Malmsbury tells us already existed in the time of Dunstan, that Dunstan gave large and deep- retains all the requisites for this scene. toned bells (Signa sono et mole prse- The angel and the boy ascended stantia) to the Abbey of Malmsbury, up the wide and massive stairs con- and organs, in which the inflated bel- tained in the semicircular appendage lows pour out the air which they have to the tower, and crossing over to the just received, through brazen pipes, other side of the tower, looked down of such length as to produce the vari- upon the church from the threefold ous musical notes. (Organa, uti per opening in the west wall of the nave, sereas fistulas musicis mensuris elabo- THE SAXON PERIOD. 51 matters. He was much pressed by a certain pious matron to paint a pattern upon a priest's stole which she might afterwards enrich with golden embroidery. 1 Dunstan goes to her house and hangs his harp on the wall, he applies his hand to the work for which he came, and his heart and lips to the praises of God ; when the harp, without touch of man, pours forth, with the ut- most precision the melody of the anthem : " The souls of the saints rejoice in heaven, who have followed Christ on earth, who have poured forth their blood for love of Him, for they shall reign with Christ for ever" The damsels of the family, — the mis- tress, the servants, — all exclaim that their guest is wiser than he ought to be ; but Dunstan hears in this heavenly strain an admonition to follow Christ more closely, if necessary even to the shedding of his blood. He had soon an opportunity of prac- tising this lesson ; for being accused of magic, he was dismissed from the court, and his enemies brutally assaulted him as he retired, adding violence to their former enmity, and the danger of death to his disgrace. Before he had taken the habit, Dunstan was a pattern of all those virtues which are most nourished by the monastic system, and most lauded in monkish legends ; and now, having become a monk, he added to his former discipline the still greater as- ceticism of a hermit. He built for himself a little shed 2 against the church, less like a human habitation than a tomb, in length about five feet,, in breadth two and a half feet : one side of the shed which opened, and contained the only window, was the door. ratas dudum conceptas follis vomit 1 So I understand the words : vt anxius auras,) and on these he placed ei sacerdotalem stolam artificiosa ope- a brazen plate thus inscribed : ratione perpingeret quam postea ad " Organa de Sancto Prsesul Dunstanus divinos cultus aurifactoria imitatione Adelmo figuraret. And we have here an inter- Predat, hie seternum qui vult huic esting record of church embroidery, tollere regnum." and of the way in which the pious William of Malmsbury had also hands of those days were directed seen a waterpot thus inscribed : in the choice of appropriate decora - " Idriola hanc fundi Dunstan man- tions, and even helped in their diffi- daverat Archi- cult task. Prsesul ; ut in templo sancto serviret 2 " Destinam, sive spelseum, sive Adelmo." alio quolibet nomine rectius nominari — William of Malmsbury de vita potest." Adhelmi. E 2 52 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. This was his house, his bed, and all of this world that he beheld. There would Dunstan stand at his work ; and there would the devil reiterate his attacks. He would peep through the little win- dow and utter perverse speeches, intermingling the names of wo- men, and the recollection of pleasures, with his talk, and turning the life of a religious to ridicule. The soldier of Christ recognized the tempter, and putting his tongs into the fire, began with lips closely pressed together, to call on the name of Christ ; and when he saw the tongs were red hot, he snatched them from the fire, and seizing the obscene monster by the nose dragged him into his shed. The devil roared with rage and pain, and escaped at last tearing down part of the wall as he went. A story of this kind carries with it its own refutation, as the asser- tion of a fact ; but it conveys this true lesson : That the man whose hands are never idle, has a great advantage over the tempter. The king being in imminent danger while hunting, called to mind his harshness to Dunstan, and prayed to God to forgive him this wrong, and to save his life. He was delivered, and in recompense gave to Dunstan his royal demesnes at Glastonbury, with the privilege of establishing a monastery there for his own order. Dunstan commences the work without delay. The foundation of a more splendid church is laid, and all the requi- site buildings are planned according to the pattern which had been revealed to him. A great concourse of monks are collected, and Dunstan becomes the first abbot of the first Benedictine monastery in England. The king was slain soon after, and his body being brought to Glastonbury, was buried by Dunstan. Edred succeeded, and under the influence of Dunstan was a great benefactor of churches. Edwy his successor was a less worthy prince, and Dunstan retired to his monastery. Here miracles continued to attest his sanctity. 1 There was a tower which had not yet been roofed : and when the workmen were raising a heavy beam to the top, the ropes broke, and the beam began to fall. Dunstan hears a scream, rushes forth, 1 It may be well to observe that by far the greater part of the miracles at- tributed to Dunstan are not alluded to. Those only are mentioned which are in some degree connected with his occu- pation as an artificer or builder, or with some part of ecclesiastical habits and ritual. THE SAXON PERIOD. 53 making the sign of the cross in the air, and the beam immedi- ately rises again to its place. The devil is again enraged, and attacks Dunstan in the form of a bear, and tries to tear his pas- toral staff from him. The good Abbot retains his hold, raises the staff into the air, and lets it fall on his adversary with such force, that it is broken into three pieces. The vices of Edwy were so flagrant, that Dunstan was forced to administer a harsh rebuke, and he w T as in consequence banished the court an,d the kingdom ; but Edwy died, and Edgar succeeded, during whose reign Dunstan acquired his greatest influence. He held at the same time the Bishoprics of London and Worcester, reconciling his conscience to the plu- rality, no doubt, by the belief that he should have the greater power to effect his darling object — the aggrandisement of the monks, at the expense of the secular clergy. 1 He afterwards re- signed those sees to occupy the metropolitan throne of Canter- bury. Here he continued with the increased influence of his station to carry on the same unjust warfare. Here he died (a.d. 988), and here he "was buried in the spot which he him- self had chosen two days before his death, — the place, to wit, were the Divine Office was daily celebrated by the brethren, and which was before the steps which led up to the Altar of the Lord Christ. Here in the midst of the choir, his body was deposited in a leaden coffin, deep in the ground, according to the ancient custom of the English ; and the depth of his grave was made equal to the stature of an ordinary man. A tomb was afterwards constructed over him, in the form of a large and lofty pyramid, and having at the head of the Saint the matutinal altar. Thus, by choosing so conspicuous a spot, he left a mourn- ful and tender memorial of himself to the brethren singing in the choir, or ascending the steps of the altar." 2 . . . . " After the great fire at Canterbury, there was erected over his resting- 1 A highly picturesque vision of the have ceased to be the bane of the blessed Apostles SS. Peter, Paul, and Church ! Andrew was invented, to sanctify this 2 This account of the burial and irregularity. We must omit it from tomb of Dunstan is taken from Pro- its length. May the days come when fessor Willis's Architectural History pluralities, under whatever excuse, of Canterbury Cathedral, pp. 6 — 13. 54 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. place, a house of small magnitude, in which masses were daily performed over his body." Dunstan had but too well succeeded in his attack on the credit of the secular clergy. Edgar, during his reign, erected or restored no fewer than forty-eight monasteries, and the Bene- dictine rule was advanced to its greatest perfection, with corres- ponding reputation and prosperity, under Ethelwold and Oswald, 1 Bishops of Winchester and Worcester, who co-ope- rated zealously with Dunstan while he lived, and advanced his plans most effectually after his death. Of the influence of Oswald, we have the following very interesting example, in the foundation of the Abbey of Ramsey. The isle of Ramsey, in Huntingdonshire, was the least repul- sive of the marsh lands of that district, and the mere out of which it arose was remarkable for the abundance of fish which it produced, especially eels, and pike of enormous size. In the reign of Edgar it was part of the patrimony of Aylwin, a noble- man of the highest reputation, and rich in the favour of his prince and of all the people. It happened that to Aylwin the King intrusted the funeral of one of the greatest and most be- loved persons of his court; and at Glastonbury, where the 1 " Oswald had not been long es- tablished in his see, before he endea- voured to convert the cathedral of that diocese into a Benedictine monas- tery ; but being thwarted in his plans by the opposition which his scheme met with from the Chapter, he was de- termined to have his revenge. Accord- ingly, he founded a monastery in the neighbourhood, and introduced into it the Benedictine rule, hoping that the people in those parts would be led to draw invidious comparisons between the two rival institutions ; nor was the expedient altogether unsuccessful. Numerous congregations attended up- on the ministry of the monks, while the cathedral was nearly deserted. Pecuniary losses contributed to in- crease the mortification which was hence experienced ; for many offer- ings were taken to the altar of the Benedictines, while few were presented in the cathedral. These losses, to- gether with the increasing reputation of the newly-founded monastery began, at length, to operate upon the minds of the Chapter : and one of the senior canons, named Wensinus, a man much esteemed among his brethren, yielded to the wishes of Oswald, and was im- mediately sent by him to Ramsey, for instruction in the Benedictine disci- pline. Other canons followed the example of Wensinus, who, having been recalled by his diocesan, was appointed prior of the monastery, which Oswald had succeeded in sub- stituting for his Chapter." — Fox's Monks and Monasteries. THE SAXON PERIOD. 55 corpse was to return to its dust, Oswald, the successor of Dun- stan in his influence over the monastic body, and now his suffragan, 3 took part in the obsequies. Aylwin was irresistibly attracted towards the Bishop by the sanctity of his deportment, and after the solemn rites were concluded, he hastened to con- verse with him, like Cornelius with S. Peter, but moved not by an angel, but by the devotion of his soul, and not as a seeker of the rudiments of the faith, but as a hearer of counsels of perfection. The conversation as given by the chronicler of Ramsey is too long to be translated entire, but it is so remarkable as a sum- mary of the arguments by which great men were often led to the foundation of religious houses, and so valuable therefore in its bearing on ecclesiological history, that I shall endeavour to condense its spirit within a smaller space. " Providence," said the Earl, " has at length smiled on my wish to see you, and I trust that our meeting may not be with- out occasions of converting acquaintance into a deeper friend- ship. I am a man under authority, yet blessed with a large es- tate and with great influence. This is the gift of God, and I well know that where He has given much He will require the more." The heart of the Bishop warmed towards Aylwin as he re- plied, " I thank you, most noble Earl, for the way in which you have more than anticipated the movement of my heart towards you ; and yet more do I thank God for the good seed which He has sown within you. True, indeed, it is, that the more exalted our station, the greater our obligation to fill it worthily. And though we be lifted up above other men, yet have we enough in common with them to keep us lowly. All alike are born in sor- row, and living in sorrow, in sorrow at last end our days, God having set no differences between men, except those of virtue and vice. Wealth and honour are blessings and privileges only when we rule them, instead of their enslaving us ; and though perhaps greatness may be permitted us, lowliness is the most blessed estate. The wind that sweeps the broad boughs of the lofty tree, shakes its roots to their last fibre, while the bending reed rises erect again, and the lowly myrtle scarcely feels the 1 Dunstan being Archbishop of Canterbury, Oswald Bishop of Worcester. 56 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. blast. The worm feeds sweetly on Csesar and Alexander. Or look on the freshly turned soil beneath our feet. He who was yesterday great and greatly beloved, whose word turned the mind even of the king, who was clothed in purple and silk and gold, and feasted with us in the king's chamber, — he is now in his grave, and all that he had is passed away, except the treasure which he may have laid up in heaven." Bursting into tears, the Earl asked what remedy remained for him, whose very greatness did but multiply his cares, and whose duties were too full of occasions of sin, or at best of mistaken judgment. The Bishop replied, that if he made equity always his guide, his worldly honours would be profitable to him ; but that if by any error or fault of judgment, or inscrutable acci- dent, he had swerved from the right, he might atone for the error by increased alms, and by relief of the distressed. Yet that, after all, those only are free who have embraced a voluntary poverty for Christ's sake. " And great is the praise of their estate. Often do their prayers and their merits avert the judg- ments of heaven, obtain healthful and fruitful seasons, drive away famine and pestilence : in their retirement they do indeed rule kingdoms, open prisons, break chains asunder. In their poverty and simplicity they relieve the shipwrecked, cure the sick, strengthen the weak ; in a word, while the world in its madness abuses the Divine patience, for their sake its whole framework is maintained. If then, you know in all your wide lands, a place fit for the residence of holy men, who by their prayers may supply your defects and expiate your sins, do not hesitate to appropriate it to so good a purpose, and from me you shall have all the help that my office and experience can afford." Aylwin. " Such a place I have, reverend father, called Ram- sey, in all respects fit for the habitation of such a holy brother- hood. Remote from all concourse of men, the very spirit of solitude reigns there, yet it is fertile, and well clothed with woods, and its flocks and pastures amply repay the care bestowed upon them. Till lately there was no building there, but a few sheds for the flocks which I used to send to fatten in the rich pasture ; but some years back, when I had long languished under a severe and hopeless illness, I received the promise of a THE SAXON PERIOD. 57 cure from S. Benedict, and at the same time was enjoined to build a monastery, in the very place of which I speak. The vision soon received the first part of its fulfilment, in the resto- ration of my health, and I hastened to perform my part ; throw- ing up a little cell, with wooden walls, which might remain until I had leisure to erect a larger church, and all necessary offices for the reception of the brethren. There three men only who have renounced the luxuries of the world, await the aid and counsel of some one who shall teach them the monastic rule." Oswald. " In a village in my diocese there are twelve brethren who have cast behind their backs the lusts of the flesh, and are only warmed with Divine love. These would willingly under- take the charge : let us then go at once, together, and inspect the place of which you speak." Aylwin. " It is well said, most holy father ; thither will we go, and there shall the flock whom you mention form one fold with those already there." And now they bid adieu to the assembled Bishops and Barons, and hasten to Ramsey. " Here, father," says Aylwin, " is the place which S. Benedict pointed out as a site for a religious house. Here you have only to command, it will be my happiness to obey." Oswald, with a prescient spirit, exclaimed, " Verily this is an- other Eden, pre-ordained for men destined for the highest heaven. In this place, my friend, shall all generations ac- knowledge the proofs of your faith and devotion ; and while we are here erecting a temporary mansion, we shall also be erecting, if our faith fail not, a mansion eternal in the heavens. Let us then commence at once, for as the iron is beaten while glowing with internal fire into whatever form the smith chooses : so must we, while the little spark of an inceptive devotion is kindled in us, go on with the work which we have designed, lest the devil should take occasion of any delay to breathe a colder spirit upon us, and so the conclusion answer not to the beginning. Let me therefore return to my own place, and send hither a certain man, faithful and approved in such works, under whose management a little refectory and dormitory may be pre- pared for the brethren who shall come hither, until we shall 58 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. ourselves return, and consult about the form and character of the future church/' The architect whom Oswald sent was iEdnothus, who at once laid out the ground, and enlarged the chapel, which he found there already, adding other buildings according to the form and manner which had been fairly designed for him by the holy man. Twelve brethren from Westbury were sent to Ramsey, and the care of the internal arrangement of the monastery was commit- ted to Germanus, that of all out-door works to iEdnothus. During the winter he got together whatever instruments of wood or iron would be required for the masons' work ; and as the flowers of spring peeped forth, artificers were seen gathering together to the works. The length and breadth of the church to be constructed are marked out : the foundations, on account of the dampness of the soil, are deeply laid ; and the bed is made still more solid to sustain the superimposed weight, by frequent blows of the beetle. 1 The labourers are stimulated as well by devotion as by their wages, some bring stones together, some temper mortar, and some raise on high both stones and mortar with a crane, and the work visibly progresses, through the Lord's help. Moreover, two towers are raised above the ridge of the roof: the first, standing at the west end of the church, presents from afar a noble spectacle to those who enter the island ; 2 but the greater tower rises from the centre of the cross upon four columns, connected with arches, springing across from aisle to aisle. In truth the whole is a glorious edifice, according to the form of building of the day. 3 1 The historians mention the means taken to secure a good foundation in Croyland also, and at Medeshamstede. " At Croyland, on account of the spongy nature of the soil, innumerable piles of oak and alder were driven into the ground, and the spaces between them filled up with dry earth, brought from a distance of nine miles." (In- gulf, fol. 485.) " At Medeshamstede, the foundations were laid with stones of such enormous size that each was drawn to its place by a team of eight yoke of oxen." (Hug. Oand. p. 4.) Lingard. 2 Lingard infers that this tower was separate from the main building. This certainly does not appear in the ori- ginal. 3 Inito deinde consilio, tota hyeme sequenti quicquid provida csementari- orum ars, tarn in ferreis quam in ligneis instrumentis, exquirebat, et omnia, quse futuro videbantur eedificio neces- saria prseparabat. Emensa denique hyeme, cum jam consitum floribus ver caput exereret, fit congestorum distractio thesaurorum. Exquisiti conducuntur artifices, construendse THE SAXON PERIOD. 59 But the brethren of Ramsey did not long pride themselves without rebuke in the beauty of their church. When they arose one morning they saw in the central tower a great crack, from top to bottom, which seemed to threaten the whole church with instant destruction. Germanus and iEdnothus were sent to Aylwin to tell him of the misfortune. The noble soldier of Christ for a moment repressed his words, lest he should seem to reproach God by an impatient expression of grief ; but soon he recovered his self-possession, and said, " I was dumb, dearest children, at your news, for I saw that my travail had returned upon me ; but it is the Lord's will, and blessed be His Name. I had hoped that my limbs, weary and worn out, might at length enjoy a seasonable rest, and now two things conspire to dis- appoint my wishes, — the loss of former labours, and the neces- sity of renewed exertions. But for this I have to thank God, that as yet my body is vigorous, and that an unsubdued spirit animates my aged frame." The good old man hastens to the spot, the brethren meet him. He enters the church, attended by the choristers, and having first celebrated Divine service, he takes courage to look on the terrific ruin. The masons all agree that the fault was in the softness of the foundation, and that without taking down the whole, it could not be remedied. Oswald is consulted, and he too in his old age gives cheerful and wise counsel. The brethren must have been weak indeed not to be encouraged by such advisers, and base indeed not to be sti- mulated to exertion by the greatness of their hearts. " Behold/'' said Aylwin, " how little time or strength is left to me : you whose minds are still firm and active as your bodies, — you must Basilicse longitudo et latitudo com- mensuratur, fundamenta alta propter uliginem undique vicinam jaciuntur, et crebris arietum ictibus insolidam sup- ponendo oneri fortitudinem fortius contunduntur. Operariis igitur tarn devotionis fervore quam mercedis amore laborem continuantibus, dum alii lapides comportant, alii cseinentum conficiunt, atque alii hoc et illos rotali machina in altum subministrant, Do- mino incrementum prsestante opus indies altius consurgit. Duse quo que turres ipsis tectorum culminibus emi- nebant, quarum minor versus occiden- tem in fronte Basilicse pulchrum intrantibus Insulam a longe spectacu- lum prsebebat, major vero in quad- rifidse structurse medio columnas quatuor, porrectis de ala, ad alam arcubus sibi invicem connexas, ne laxe defluerent, deprimebat. Juxta earn qua vetus ilia antiquitas utebatur, sedificandi formam, spectabile satis sedificium. — Hist. Ramasiensis. 60 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. bear the burden of the work. As for me, the wealth which I have acquired shall be devoted to the service, and, thank God, it will be enough." The labourers approach the tower by the roof, and going stoutly to work, take it down stone by stone to the very ground. They search into the cause of so grievous a destruction, and having taken out the earth from a great depth, find where the foundation was defective. 1 Then making a firm cement with stones and mortar, which they render still harder with the blows of beetles, they fill up the trench, and the masons rejoice to see the daily progress of their work. 2 While thus stimulating others, Oswald himself was not idle ; the church of Worcester attracted his zeal and munificence, and 1 " Deinde lapidum congerie arie- tum tunsionibus cum caemento tena- tiori durius conserta, abyssum ipsam denuo construunt, et supersedificantes cotidiani laboris votivo gaudent pro- ventu." The Historia Ramasiensis, from which these accounts are taken, is by a brother of that house, whose name and age are unknown, though it is certain he did not write before the time of Henry I. 2 The Abbey of Ramsey affords one of the early instances in Sir Henry Spelman's History and Fate of Sacri- lege. The story touches the fabric more nearly than usual. " Circ. a,d. 1142, Geoffrey Mande- ville, Earl of Essex, being called, among other of the nobility, to a council at S. Alban's, he was there unduly taken at S. Alban's, prisoned, and could have no liberty till he de- livered the Tower of London, and the Castles of Walden and Plessy : being thus spoiled of his holds, he turned his fury upon the Abbey of Ramsey, it being a place of security, and in- vading it by force, drove out the monks, and placed his soldiers in their room, and fortified the church instead of his castle. The abbot and monks betook them to their arms, and with all the force they could, shot their curses and imprecations against him and his complices. ITius prepared to his destruction, he besieged the Castle of Burwell, where a peasant shooting him lightly in the head with an arrow, contemning the wound, he died of it, in excommunication, leaving three sons inheritors of that malediction, but of no lands of their father, the king having seized them. " Arnulph, his eldest son, who still maintained the Church of Ramsey as a castle, was taken prisoner by King Ste- phen, stripped of all his inheritance, banished, and died without issue. " Geoffrey Mandeville, second son, was restored by King Henry II., and married Eustachia, the king's kins- woman, but had no issue by her. " William Mandeville, the third son, succeeded his brother, and was twice married, but died without issue. Thus the name and issue of this sacri- legious earl were all extinct, and the inheritance carried to Geoffrey Fitz- Peter, another family, by the marriage of Beatrix Lay, his sister's grand- child." At the dissolution of monasteries, Ramsey fell to Sir Richard Cromwell, and brought with it the usual penalty attached to sacrilege. But very small traces of the edifice remain. THE SAXON PERIOD. 61 I shall take occasion from his great name, to enter upon the subject of what may be called architectural miracles, which abound in the works of the monastic historians. The building of the church at Worcester was not effected, according to the legend, without the opposition of an envious spirit. The wall had already reached a considerable height, when the workmen were delayed by an unexpected difficulty. A stone ready squared for its place lay near the building, and a sufficient number of men went to bring it to its appointed place. The stone remained, as if rooted in the earth, and additional numbers again and again attempted in vain to remove it. All were amazed, and sent to Oswald, and he, too, seeing the num- bers who were expending their strength on an apparently easy task, was astonished. And thus he stood, amazed, and calling on God in prayer, when all at once he beheld a black man sitting on the stone, and mocking with impudent jestures at the attempts of the labourers. Then Oswald making the sign of the cross, the imp was obliged to flee, and a few hands raised the stone at which eighty men had before laboured in vain. 1 Adhelm, Bishop of Shirburn, and founder of the Abbey of Malmsbury, is likewise reported to have wrought a miracle upon a part of the materials of his sacred edifice. The story is told by William of Malmsbury, 2 with some circumstances which throw a little light on the habits of workmen, and may therefore be repeated. There was already a church at Malmsbury dedicated to S. Peter, but Adhelm, never weary in good works, erected another, within the precincts of the monastery, in honour of the Blessed Virgin ; and yet another he built and dedicated to S. Michael, which last, the historian says, yet remained in his time, and sur- passed every other building of the same antiquity in England. In order therefore that this church might be the more exqui- sitely finished, after the stone walls had been erected at the most lavish expense, 3 a vast quantity of timber was brought to- 1 Eadmerus de vita S. Oswaldi. 3 Anglia Sacra, ii. 15. 3 Edificandum post lapideum tabu- latum sine ulta parsimonia sumptuum. It has been suggested (in a paper on some anomalies observable in the ear- lier styles of English Architecture, in the Winchester Vol. of the Transac- 62 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. gether at great cost of carriage, the saint himself labouring at the work, that he might render the more acceptable service to his Lord. 1 And now they had come to the fastening together of the beams, which had been cut of the same length, except one, which set the skill of the carpenters at defiance ; whether by the carelessness of those who had cut it, or, (as the relater is more disposed to believe,) by the express will of God, that the sanctity of Adhelm might be better displayed, this single beam was found too short for its position. The workmen for a long time hesitate to tell their master ; for there was no provi- sion made for such mischances, and it would have been a work of great cost to procure another beam. At length however they tell him, and he receives grace from God to extend the beam by a miracle to its proper length ; and then in his earnestness to avoid their praises, he accuses the workmen of having played him a trick, in pretending that it was defective. And now the beam being borne aloft with the pulleys, 2 the roof is completed. It was afterwards reported of this beam, that when the monas- tery was once and again destroyed by fire, it remained un- touched, 3 and at length perished only with the lapse of years. We may here observe (and with this observation dismiss the subject,) that such miracles connected with the fabric of the church and its erection, are very common in the old legends. It really was, in those days, from the small number of churches, — as it has since become from the greatness of the population, — one of the most excellent of the works of charity to build churches ; and as such it would rightly be believed that it was one which the devil would most zealously oppose, and God tions of the Archaeological Institute,) that the words lapidei tabulatus are applied to those towers rising in stages from the perpent blocks of stone that run transversely on their four sides : to me it rather appears that the words simply signify courses of masonry. 1 We have a more tragic instance of an Abbot assisting in the labours of the masons. Reinfrid, the venerable Abbot of Whitby, about 1083, having undertaken a journey on account of his monastery, and coming to Orms- bridge, where workmen were employed in making a bridge over the Derwent, he alighted from his horse to lend them his assistance, when a piece of timber falling accidentally upon him, it frac- tured his skull, so that he died soon after.— Charlton's Whitby. 2 Funali machina. 3 Bede relates the same of a beam against which Bishop Aidan leaned, when he died. — Ecc. Hist. iii. 17. THE SAXON PERIOD. 63 most graciously assist. If this consideration induced those who were benefited by the good work to believe the miracles with which it was said to have been attended, let us not condemn their credulity without emulating their piety and thankfulness : and if we are not disposed to admit fabled wonders as proofs of the sanctity of Dunstan, Oswald or Adhelm, let us imitate, or at least reverence what was good in them, and in their deeds of charity, before we despise those who expressed their admiration somewhat absurdly. The opposition of the great enemy to churches, did not cease with their erection, and the rage of Pagans was often stirred up to destroy the churches of the saints : but there were never wanting some to restore them to their former splendour, and very often the gift to the church would come from the most re- mote and unexpected sources. The restoration of the Abbey of Croyland, by Turketul, afterwards its Abbot, but for a long- course of time a high civil officer, may be given as an instance. He is, says Lord Campbell, the first English chancellor with whom we can be said to be well acquainted. He was of illus- trious birth, being the eldest son of Ethelwald, and the grand- son of Alfred. He was very distinguished for learning, piety, and courage. He held the office of chancellor under Edward the Elder, Athelstan, Edmund and Eldred, and from 920 to 948. It is related that going on a message from the King to Archbishop Wolstan, it chanced that his road lay by the Abbey of Croyland, which had been reduced to ruins in recent warfare, and now only afforded a miserable shelter to three aged monks. 1 Touched by their piety and resignation, he believed himself divinely inspired with a design to enter their society, and to res- tore their house to its ancient splendour. For this purpose he resigned his high civil office, and like Samuel in a like case, made further proclamation that he was ready to pay all his debts, and to make three-fold restitution to any persons whom he might have injured. Every demand upon him being liberally satisfied, he resigned the office of Chancellor into the king's 1 Lingard, in the twelfth chapter of of the Danes on this occasion, which his history of the Anglo-Saxon church, overwhelmed other monasteries besides gives a graphic account of the ravages Croyland. 64 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. hands, made a testamentary disposition of his great possessions, put on the monastic cowl, was blessed by the Bishop of Dor- chester, and recovered for the abbey all that it had lost in the Danish wars, endowed it with fresh wealth, was elected Abbot, and procured from the king and the Witan a confirmation of all the rights which his house had ever enjoyed, with the excep- tion of the privilege of sanctuary, which he voluntarily re- nounced, on the ground that his experience as Chancellor made him consider it a violation of justice and an incentive to crime. He survived twenty-seven years, performing, in the most exem- plary manner, the duties of his new station, and declaring that he was happier as Abbot of Croyland, than as Chancellor of England. He died in 975. 1 It is one of the things which give a charm to the pursuits of the ecclesiologist, that some remote church, in itself insignifi- cant, becomes interesting from some peculiarity ; and this is well exemplified by the little Saxon church of Kirkdale, beauti- fully situated in the North Riding of Yorkshire. Over the porch of this church is a Saxon inscription, recording the des- truction of a former church, most probably by the Danes, and the erection of one in the reign of Edward the Confessor, to- gether with the name of the builder, of the engraver of the inscription, and the Priest of the church at that time : — more a great deal than we can generally learn about churches erected many centuries nearer to our own time. It is true that the in- scription is not now in its original place, (if Rickman's sugges- tion be accepted,) but parts of the church still standing, may well be referred to the date there ascribed to it. The inscrip- tion is on a stone seven feet five, by one foot ten, built into the wall over the south porch, and containing a dial, or, as it would be called in olden times, an orologe. It runs thus, in English : "Orin, Gamel's Son, bought St. Gregory's Minster. Then IT WAS ALL TO BROKEN AND FALLEN. ChEHITTLE AND others made it new from the ground, to christ and St. Gregory. In the days of Edward the King, and in the days of Earl Tosti." Under the dial are the words, "And Howard me wrought, and Brand the Priest." There is besides a line over the dial, not so easily decyphered. 1 Lives of the Chancellors, Vol. I. THE SAXON PERIOD. 65 This inscription fixes the date of Kirkdale church between the years 1056 and 1065, during which time Tosti was Earl of Nor- thumberland. Chehittle and Haward, the builder of the church and maker of the orologe, are among the very few Saxon artifi- cers whose names are perpetuated by a visible memorial of their skill.i We might find notices (though few, if any, so remarkable as this,) of the erection of many smaller churches during the Saxon era, but unless they were accompanied with some descrip- tion, or other particulars relating to the fabric, they would add little to the interest of our inquiries. Here, then, having brought it to the reign of Edward the Confessor, and the very extreme verge of pure Saxon architecture, we shall close the history of the period ; and we shall devote the next chapter to a few gene- ral remarks on the character of Anglo-Saxon churches, and on some circumstances originating in those times, which still affect the structure and arrangement of our churches. 1 See Archseologia, v. 188. P 66 CHAPTER V. The Saxon Period. General Review of Ecclesiastical Architecture in the Saxon era : Brixworth, Greensted. — Circumstances which continued to af- fect Churches AND THEIR STRUCTURE IN AFTER AGES: — MONACHISM. The Division of England into Parishes : — The Introduction of Glass : — The use of Lead for Roofs : — Accumulation of Wealth in precious vestments and ornaments : — Church Music : — The Organ: — Bells: — Dials and Clocks: — The Bell-tower. — Burial in Churches. We might multiply, almost indefinitely, the accounts of churches erected during the Saxon era, but separate accounts add little to our real knowledge of the state of architecture, and the principles of church builders : we shall therefore content ourselves with a general estimate of the number of churches erected in England at the time of the Conquest, and a slight sketch of their archi- tectural features. If we follow Mr. Churton in his calculation, (and we can hardly wish for a better guide,) we shall infer that there were probably before the Conquest about one-third the number of churches in England that there are now, (i.e. not much less than four thousand. 1 ) "In Northamptonshire, where three of the old forests are yet left in part, and which was most thinly inhabited in Saxon times, there were at the Conquest 1 Domesday is a very uncertain guide. " It mentions about 1700 churches, but while 222 are returned from Lincolnshire, 243 from Norfolk, 364 from Suffolk, 7 from the city of York, 84 from the county of Cam- bridgeshire, and none from Lancashire, Cornwall, or Middlesex : yet it can- not be doubted that all the counties which are passed over without any mention of their ecclesiastical struc- tures, possessed thern like those enu- merated. This will at once raise the number of Anglo-Saxon churches ex- isting at the time of the Conquest, not to the extent of 45,011, mentioned by Sprott in his Chronicle, which seems incredible, but to a very considerable number, since certainly the other counties would have a proportionable amount." See a paper by Mr. Harts- horne on some anomalies observable in the earlier styles of English Architec- ture in the Archaeological Journal of the early and middle ages. No. 12, December, 1846. THE SAXON PERIOD. 67 more than sixty village churches, while the county town con- tained eight or nine — three or four more than it has now. In Derbyshire there were not fewer than fifty, and five at least in the county town. These are exclusive of monasteries and the churches belonging to them ; of which there were three or four in Northamptonshire, without reckoning Peterborough. In the town of Newark and the manor round it, including twelve or fourteen villages, were ten churches. In Lincolnshire, which was one of the most populous and thriving counties before the Conquest, there were more than two hundred village churches, a third of the present number, without reckoning those in Lin- coln and Stamford, or the monasteries/' 1 In describing the general appearance of the churches of these times we are in some danger of underrating them, from the pre- judice against assigning too great taste or skill to the artificers of remote ages ; but with regard to elegance of design, the abi- lity displayed by the Saxons in the decorative arts, such as paint- ing and jewellery, 2 was by no means to be despised, and there can be no reason for supposing that less taste was displayed in their churches, as a whole, than in their minor accessories, or in architecture, than in what are now considered ancillary arts : nor can we read the account of Wilfrid's church at Hexham, already given, or that in Wolston's Metrical account of Winchester, without perceiving that then, as now, architecture was accounted so noble an art, as to have painting and sculpture as its hand- maids. In size 3 there will be less prejudice against admitting 1 Churton's Early English Church, pounds, and 20 mancusses. The can- p. 230. dlesticks of gold, 12 pounds 9 man- 2 The costliness of Church furni- cusses. The Holy Water stoup was ture was often very great. William of 20 pounds of silver. The images of Malmsbury tells us, [Antiq. Glast. our Lord, and of the Blessed Virgin Eccl.] that Ino, (who died in 727,) Mary, and of the twelve Apostles were caused a chapel to be formed of gold of 1 75 pounds of silver and 38 pounds and silver, with vessels and ornaments of gold ; the altar cloths, and the sa- of the same precious metals within the cerdotal vestments were all wrought church of Glastonbury. And for the with gold and jewels. The mancus construction of this chapel he gave was of the value of 30 pence, and in 2640 pounds of silver ; and the altar weight 55 grains Troy. was of gold, weighing 264 pounds. 3 p ro fessor Willis gives the dimen- The cup and paten were of 10 pounds sions of the first church at Winchester, of gold. The censer was of gold, 8 out of Moracius, 209 passus in length, F 2 68 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. the claim of the principal Saxon churches j and in constructive skill, and the mechanical contrivances so necessary to the erection of large fabrics, there is no reason to suppose that the Saxons were very inferior to their Norman conquerors. The Romans must have left behind them many practical lessons in the arts of life. The venerable Bede in his many works shows that the sciences were by no means forgotten by the Saxon Monks ; and Benedict Biscop and many like him, were continually bringing from foreign countries both arts and artisans, to recruit and stimulate the native workmen. We have found in the legends, so largely quoted above on that account, indirect traces of the use of mechanical powers, in the raising of stones and timber, and even in the moving of very large masses, such as would be called cyclopean, if they were met with in other countries : l and it is still more to the purpose that in the turning of the arch, which perhaps supposes as much skill as any ordinary part of the builders' work, and which certainly contains the germ of as much architectural beauty and character as any other feature, we have still remaining proofs of the competent skill of our Saxon forefathers. At Brixworth, for instance, the arches still remaining amply justify all that is said of Hexham, Winches- ter, or Ramsey, by the old chroniclers. It must be added that crypts almost necessarily involve vaulting of some kind or other, and these are again and again mentioned by contemporary writers 2 and it is more than probable that some traces of those which were frequented by our Saxon ancestors remain, for at the east end of Brixworth there are excavations which have laid bare an ancient fabric which may very well have been a part of the crypt beneath the high altar, and it is at least remarkable that at Ripon and Hexham, two churches founded by Wilfrid, singular 80 in breadth, and 92 in height; from an extremity of the church across to the altar 180 passus. A passus is 5 feet, this therefore must be an exag- geration ; but the Professor suggests pedes for passus which will still leave a large and lofty church. 1 See the account before given of the building of Stonehenge, and of the stones used in the foundation of Medes- hampsted. 2 Both crypts and a vault (fornix) are mentioned by Eadmer, in the Saxon Church of Canterbury, " Ad hsec altaria nonnullis gradibus ascen- debatur a Choro cantorum qucedam cripta quam Confessionem Romani vocant. Subtus erat ad instar confes- THE SAXON PERIOD. 69 crypts of very great antiquity, and much resembling each other still remain. 1 All these things considered, we shall be rather disposed to attribute some part of what is usually called Nor- man work, from the greater skill it evinces, to the Saxons, than to deny them the benefit of any evidence which may seem to assign an ante-Norman date to any existing edifice. We are besides in danger of not doing justice to Saxon archi- tecture, from the fact that in no instance has any building which probably ranked among their most imposing structures come down to us. Brixworth Church is by far the largest and most remarkable structure in this style, and this was but the church of a remote dependence on the monastery of Medeshampsted : 2 if this be taken as only second or third rate, the finer churches must have been of ample size, and of very considerable dignity of character. Mr. Bloxam, in his work on the principles of Gothic eccle- siastical architecture, (which is by the way incomparably the best manual in existence,) enumerates sixty-four churches which have more or less Saxon work remaining, to thirty-seven of which he refers from his own inspection. From these we col- lect that the masonry of the age was rude and massive ; that the apertures were small, with round or triangular heads, for doors and windows ; with the frequent occurrence in the belfry, of a two-light window, the lights divided by a round baluster. The arches are not generally of large span, and have almost invariably flat soffits. But the constructive feature which has been most generally relied on as indicating Saxon masonry, and that which gives to it considerable character, is the use of what is technically called long and short work, or the laying of long stones alternately with their long and their short sides to the surface, either in the angles or on the faces of buildings, in the latter case giving them a little prominence, so as to divide the whole surface into rude panels. This construction is the more remarkable, because it will be found, if I mistake not, to sug- sionis S. Petri fabricata, cujus fornix eo in altum tendebatur ut superiora ejus non nisi per plures gradus pos- sent adiri." — [Quoted from Professor Willis' Canterbury, p. 10.] 1 The crypt ascribed to Grimbald in S. Peter's Church, Oxford, seems from its more elaborate construction to be of Norman date. 2 Now Peterborough. 70 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. gest a connecting link between Saxon masonry, and more than one earlier and later development of the art of building. That the " long and short work " has an analogy in visible arrangement with the rudest construction of buildings with wood is so clear, that it has been likened to " stone carpentry and thus it serves to perpetuate the visible forms of a time when wood was the most usual building material. But constructively speaking, the long and short work is more exactly analogous with the bonding courses of brick in Roman masonry, for the stones which present their smaller face to the eye are perpent stones running through the wall. In their effect on the appear- ance of the building, however, these two methods are directly opposed. The Roman courses of brick divide the wall horizon- tally, the Saxon courses of stone divide it vertically. This is the more worthy of remark, because it is, perhaps, the first germ of that vertically in Gothic art which at last expanded into the spires of Salisbury and Coventry. A comparison of the Roman tower in Dover Castle with that of Barnack or Barton, will at once establish this distinction ; and the engaged shaft rising from the first pair of windows in the tower of Sompting Church, to the gable of the highly conical roof, so forcibly suggests the vertically of larger portions in later works, that we must believe its effect was already felt, though it was not fully developed till after ages. But the most striking contrast between the effect of horizon- tal bonding courses as in Roman masonry, and of vertical lines, like those produced by the Saxon long and short work, is visi- ble in the Roman fortifications in Norfolk, as compared with the churches of the same district. To the eye, the vertical panelling in the churches takes the place of the long portions of the Saxon work, though there is nothing to answer construc- tively to the short portions, (short, that is, as they appear on the outer surface of the wall,) forming bonding stones in the " long and short work." The Roman and the mediaeval architects both used flint, the material of the country. The former con- sulted, most probably, only security, in using frequent horizon- tal courses of brick between the flint ; the latter consulted appearance, and in harmony with their present style of archi- tecture, decorated their walls with perpendicular panellings of ashlar, appearing only on the surface, and the interstices filled THE SAXON PERIOD. 71 with flint. Constructively then there is no connection between the panelling of the later flint churches, and the bonding bricks of the Romans, and stones of the Saxons : but to the eye, the Saxons in taking a constructive lesson from the Romans, so modified it as to anticipate in a great degree the character of a panelling used very largely in the fifteenth century. The comparison of the perpent stones of the Saxons with the bonding courses of brick of the Romans, is the more remarkable, because the use of Roman bricks, or of bricks made after the Roman fashion, was so common with the Saxons, as to be almost characteristic of their style ; and yet they never used them for the same purpose to which they had seen them applied by the Romans. They are generally found in the heads and jambs of doors, and in the soffits of arches ; but sometimes also arranged in the walls in that peculiar form of masonry which is called Herring -hone. The use of Roman brick is generally to be ac- counted for from the fact that some Roman building was made to contribute its material to the sacred edifice. This was the case, for instance, at S. Alban's, though the date of those parts of the building which now present that appearance does not go back beyond the Conquest. The occurrence of Roman bricks sometimes (though it may seem paradoxical to assert it) affords the clearest proof that the building is not Roman, though it may sometimes have been so called ; for small portions of Ro- man mortar, differing from the Saxon mortar in having pounded brick mixed with it, will often be found adhering to the bricks, proving that they are not now used for the first time. In general outline and pictorial effect, the churches of the first ten centuries were probably all of them low and compara- tively unadorned ; but there was considerable variety in their appearance. Many had a nave and aisles as well as a chancel, and the latter often terminated in an apse or semicircular pro- jection. Some few, among which Ramsey was one of the most remarkable, had transepts, with the tower at the intersection of the cross ; and Ramsey at least, if there were no others so dis- tinguished, had a second tower at the west end. Tn two re- maining instances 1 there are semicircular appendages running 1 Brixworth and Brigs tock, both in Northamptonshire. 72 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. up to the top of the tower, and presenting to an eye unaccus- tomed to such a form a very strange outline. This appendage was probably not unfrequent, and was doubtless intended to facilitate access to the belfry. 1 The tower, that unequalled source of character, was perhaps seldom omitted in the village churches, for the Saxon who possessed live hundred acres of land, if he had a church with a bell-tower on his estate, might claim the rank of a Thane ; 2 and the number of towers still remaining, leaves no doubt that they were very general : it would be most unjust not to add, that they bear several of them, to be compared, in dignity of effect, with the towers of equal pretensions in later styles. We read also of chapels and sepa- rate altars. Perhaps a description of All Saints, Brixworth, as it may have appeared in the seventh century, will be better fitted to convey a probable impression of the character of Saxon churches, than more vague and general references. The first impression which the sight of the church conveys to one who has only known it from detached portions figured in architectural works, is of its great size; and yet it is now smaller than it was in its original state : the whole of the original aisles, and a great part of the eastern apse having been destroyed. At present it consists of a tower, with a sin- gular semicircular appendage to the west, and surmounted by a Decorated spire ; a nave and Decorated south aisle, with a Per- pendicular chancel. The insertions and substitutions are numer- ous and palpable enough, but they leave the following features distinctly visible. The original masonry of the tower rises at present but a little above the walls of the nave ; but it must have been originally much higher, for the semicircular appendage at the west, which is only a stair to the tower, is higher than the remaining portion of the Saxon work of the tower to which it gave access. We may perhaps safely infer that it rose one full story, forming the belfry, above the roof of the nave : that this story had double windows divided by a baluster shaft in each face, and that it was surmounted by a low spire-like roof, covered with shingles. It 1 At Brixworth it still retains the 2 See Churton's Early English cochleare or winding stair. Church, p. 230. THE SAXON PERIOD. 73 was approached by the stair already mentioned, which is very curious. It winds round a central mass, but to call it a newel stair would convey a very slight notion of its character. It is a spiral vault, having a headway so rude that even a correct cen- tring can hardly have been employed in its construction, and a footway of very gradual ascent, but of the roughest imaginable steps. The outer wall, the inner process, which serves as a newel, the revolving passage, all are one aggregate of rubble. It seems as if it were evolved, rather than constructed, out of unshaped masses of concrete, by the cumbrous efforts of its builders to ascend. Although this cochleare is evidently Saxon, yet it is as evident that it is of more recent date than the tower, for the west en- trance to the tower, which, as it was the principal approach to the church, was of considerable size, is contracted into a barely sufficient communication between the tower and the stairs. The tower arch too was curtailed both in height and in width, and over it was introduced a kind of triforium of three arches, with baluster-shafts, opening upon the nave from an upper floor of the tower, which communicated also with the circular stair at about half its height. A clerestory to the nave was also added at the same time, but when that time was there is nothing to suggest : however, perhaps Brixworth is unique in still re- taining Saxon remains of two well denned structures. Enter- ing the church, in its later Saxon form, through the tower, the nave, chancel, and presbytery, the latter apsidal in form, extended to a length, exclusive of the tower, of one hundred and twenty- four feet; the approach to the chancel and apse respectively being by a wide and very lofty arch. The altar was raised about six feet above the floor of the chancel, and had an approach from a crypt beneath the apse as well as from the chancel. The apse was lighted probably by three windows, the roof over it was most likely dome-shaped. With respect to the masonry, all the arches were wide and lofty, and all turned with Roman bricks, though the greater part of the walls are of the limestone of the country, and all had flat soffits. The piers throughout were square, that is, portions of wall, rather than pillars or columns, and the imposts as well as the arches were of bricks. A little herring-bone masonry appeared here and there, but no long and 74 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. short work. There was not a single moulding throughout, ex- cept in the rude baluster-shafts over the tower-arch. All that has been hitherto said relates to the stone churches of the Saxon era, but we have had frequent mention of wooden churches, and one example of these still remains. As it forms so very curious a link in the ecclesiastical architecture of England, I shall give the account of it at length from the Suckling papers, in Vol. III. of Weale's quarterly papers on Architecture, where it is accompanied with plans and drawings, which add greatly to the interest of the description. The church which the author is de- scribing is that of Greensted in Essex, which he supposes was erected in the year 1013, to receive the bones of S. Edmund, at their translation from London to Bury S. Edmund's. " The timber walls," says he, " which I take to be of oak, though some imagine them to be of chesnut wood, are but six feet in height on the outside, including the sill : they are not, as usually described, * half trees,' but have had a portion of the centre or heart cut out, probably to furnish beams for the construction of the roof and sills ; the outside or slabs thus left were placed on the sill, but by what kind of tenon they are there re- tained does not appear ; while the upper ends, being roughly adzed off to a thin edge, are let into a groove, and which, with the piece of timber in which it is cut, runs the whole length of the building itself ; the door posts are of squared timber, and these are secured in the above-mentioned groove by small wooden pins, still firm and strong, — a truly wonderful example of the durability of British oak. " The east end has been destroyed to admit access to a more modern chancel, and thus we are unable to determine whether, like most Saxon churches, this also ended in a semicircular sweep. At the west end away has been cut to the tower ; and here I had an opportunity of examining the very heart of the timber : to the edge of an exceedingly good pocket knife it appeared like iron, and has acquired from age a colour approach- ing to ebony, but of a more beautiful brown ; and if any conclusion may be drawn from the appearance of the whole building, I see no reason why it should not endure as long as it has already existed. The outsides of all the trees are furrowed to the depth of about an inch into long stringy ridges, by the decay of the softer parts of the timber, but these ridges seem equally hard as the heart of the wood itself; the north doorway measures only four feet five inches in height by two feet five inches in width. It is generally thought that the wood-work of the roof is coeval with the walls, and it was most likely formerly covered with thatch, as Bede describes, and as may still be seen on many village churches in the county of Norfolk. THE SAXON PERIOD. 75 " The body of the church is lighted by windows in the roof, but these are decidedly of a recent date; what little light its interior enjoyed in its primitive state, was probably admitted from the east end, if any windows existed at all ; but if we consider the lawless state of the times, and the sanctity and consequent value of S. Edmund's bones, it will not be hazard- ing a conjecture devoid of reason, to suppose that it was illumined solely by the flame of torches." 1 During the Saxon era many circumstances tended to influence the extent to which ecclesiastical architecture was carried, and to modify the several minor details of character and arrangement, during all succeeding ages. The introduction of the monastic 1 As the perishable nature of the materials renders this a very remark- able instance, we subjoin the grounds on which the author assigns to the church of Greensted so remote a date. "It is a mere log-house, built of the trunks of trees, like those described by the Anglo-Saxon writers, and was originally erected as a sort of shrine, for the reception of the corpse of S. Edmund, which, on its return from London to Bury S. Edmund's, in the year 1013, was, as Lydgate, a monk of that monastery, informs us, conveyed in a chest. In a MS. entitled ' The Life and Passion of Saint Edmund,' preserved at Lambeth Palace, it is re- corded, that in the year 1010, (thirtieth of Ethelred,) the body of S. Edmund was removed to London, on account of the invasion of the Danes, but that at the expiration of three years it was returned to Bedriceworth, (Bury S. Edmund's, in Suffolk,) and that it was received on its return from London at Stapleford. And in another MS. cited by Dugdale in his Monasticon, and entitled, ' The Register of Saint Ed- mund's Bury,' it is further added, 4 he was also sheltered near Aungre, where a wooden chapel remains as a memorial unto this day.' The parish of Aungre, or Ongar, herein mentioned, adjoins that of Greensted, where this church is situated, and through which the ancient road from London into Suf- folk passed ; and no doubt has ever been entertained that this rough and unpolished fabric of oak is the 'wooden chapel near Aungre.' A tradition has ever since existed in the village, that the bones of a Saxon monarch once rested in this church : and although tradition does in some cases, as I will- ingly allow, nourish erroneous opi- nions, yet when, as in the present case, it is found to be divested of all fable, and conforms itself so exactly to the records of history, and to existing monuments of antiquity, it must be granted to afford very strong additional testimony.'' Thus far the Suckling papers. Rickman assigns to it a later date, hut all his reasons are compatible with that given above. "This church has usually been considered of great an- tiquity, and from the mode of its con- struction, it would not be easy to re- pair it partially. It does not resemble the wooden edifices of Cheshire, and some of the midland counties, but is wholly a wall of upright trunks of trees, so that it may be of a date soon after the Conquest, as at any much later period it would most likely have carried with it some kind of archi- tectural arrangement, from whence a date might be inferred." — Rickman 's Gothic Architecture. 76 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. system, and the effect which it had on church building we have already noticed ; indeed our history has been hitherto chiefly occupied with the foundation and erection of monasteries ; and we have only to add that monastic establishments, including as they do many of our cathedrals, will afford a very large portion of our future materials. 1 Not inferior in importance, and not long after in point of time, is the division of the country into parishes, which has had a vast influence on ecclesiastical architecture. For this impor- tant and most beneficial change, we are indebted, as is generally supposed, to Theodore, who was Archbishop of Canterbury from 678 to 690. The effect of this arrangement must have been to limit the number, and increase the size and beauty of churches. Before this each great landholder would necessarily provide a church, and a minister, for himself and his tenants ; whereas, under the parochial system, the church would belong to a whole district, including perhaps the possessions of several persons, who would assist in the building and endowment as they were to share in the use of the sacred edifice ; or if a single person erected the church, in consideration of the greater charge, he was justly invested with the patronage. If we take the number of chantry altars 2 in our churches as an approximation to the number of families which might at some time or other have chosen to erect a chapel for themselves and their adherents, we shall scarcely set down the additional number at less than thirty or forty thousand. All these would have been, without parishes, so many inconsiderable oratories : under the parochial system they became decorations of an existing fabric, and an increased endowment, and in many cases separate aisles or chapels, of very great beauty, adding much to the splendour of the parent 1 Among the signs of the hold which the monastic system had taken on the Church, and among the causes of the splendour of monasteries, may be mentioned the frequent retreat not only of nobles, but of kings, to the seclusion and devotions of a religious order. Ethelred retired to Barding, (about a.d. 700) ; Ceolwulf (a.d.737) resigned his crown, and became a monk at Lindisfarne ; Egbert (a.d. 768) lived for ten years under the discipline of his brother, the Archbishop of York. (See Churton, pp. 108 and 232.) 2 We learn incidentally from the life of S. Wulstan, by William of Malmsbury, that there were already in the eleventh century, eighteen altars in the abbey-church of Worcester. THE SAXON PERIOD. 77 church. It will be observed, however, that the parochial system did not, till long after the Reformation, prevent the erection of chapels in castles and fortresses, and as parts of the mansions of bishops or peers, who were privileged to retain chaplains in their service. To this modification of the provisions in such cases, we owe many gems of ecclesiastical architecture, as for instance, the chapels in the Castles of Coningsborough and Chester, and in the Bishop's Palace at Wells. The monastic and parochial systems affected the very exis- tence of churches, and rendered those which were erected under their influence very different from what they would otherwise have been : other things there were which very greatly in- fluenced, and must for ever influence, the development of archi- tectural forms and character, and the details of our ecclesiastical architecture. Among these perhaps the first place is due to the introduction of glass, — in the first instance a mere contri- vance to admit light, while the external air, with all its unwel- come attendants, was excluded, — but ultimately an element in the size, shape, and construction of windows, in which the several successive developments of Gothic Architecture are more distinctly visible than in any other portion of the fabric. In our earliest buildings the unglazed apertures through which light was received, were necessarily very small, to prevent the intru- sion of rain and snow ; and, as far as possible, to exclude the winds of our northern clime. The introduction of glass must have led very soon to the use of windows sufficient, which before they could hardly be called, to admit a full light; and the greater apertures of the later Saxon, and of the Norman churches were adapted to these larger windows. After a time the general introduction of stained glass rendered still larger win- dows requisite ; and the greater size which was in the first in- stance a matter of necessity, that the quantity of light might not be diminished by the density of the medium, 1 became very 1 Prisdon speaking of the church Ottery S. Mary, says, "Otery church is fair according to the structure of those times whereof the windows little and low are so bedecked with the armouries of divers benefactors, more especially of the founder, that instead of Lux fiat it may be verified that they are umbrated thereby." — (Trans. Exeter Arch. Soc. Vol. i. p. 40.) One would hardly suspect painted glass of any power over the brightness of the Gos- 78 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. soon a matter of choice and devotion ; windows now formed a part of the decorations of churches, and they were gradually increased in size, that they might receive more and more of the beautiful creations of the glass-stainer's art, from the narrow Norman lights to the immense windows of Gloucester, York, and King's College Chapel. Many churches have had addi- tional windows inserted in all the intermediate styles, partly at least that stained glass might be introduced in greater abun- dance : and perhaps its universal introduction in the fourteenth century, may account in some degree for the forms which the tracery of the windows began to assume under the last Edward, and in the hands of the magnificent William of Wykeham ; the parallelograms into which Perpendicular windows are divided being more readily fitted with glass than the more free and flowing forms of the later Decorated. The use of lead, as a covering for churches, also occurs in this era : and this too must be recorded not merely as a fact, but as tending to affect the development of forms, and the future character of our churches. Eadbert, the seventh bishop of Lindisfarne, [a.d. 688 — 698,] covered his Cathedral with lead. Judging, however, from the representations of churches in con- temporary MSS. and in the Bayeaux tapestry, we should in- fer that the roofs were still generally covered with a kind of tile, or shingles arranged like the scales of a fish; 1 at all events the indirect results of this introduction of lead did not appear, till ages after. The lower Tudor roofs require a lighter covering than the high-pitched roofs of the preceding style, and they found it in the material applied to Lindisfarne in the seventh century. 2 We have now several accounts of the wealth of churches in pel, but John Bruce of Stapleford, in the sixteenth century, though a very- worthy man where his puritanism did not affect his power of reasoning, was of a more suspicious cast : rinding in the church of Tarvin, and his own ancient chapel many superstitious images in the windows, which by their painted coats, darkened the light of the church and obscured the brightness of the Gospel, he caused all those painted puppets to be pulled down, and at his own cost, glazed the win- dows again. — See Ormerod's Cheshire, I. 174. 1 King Eadred proposed to cover the eastern apse of the church at Win- chester with gilded tiles, deauratis irn- bricibus. But he died before it was done. 2 There is one instance in this age THE SAXON PERIOD. 79 gold and silver plate, pictures, and vestments/ a circumstance which also unhappily involves their frequent spoliation, some- times their destruction. It was seldom, however, that a stript or ruined sanctuary, did not soon find some one to restore it to greater splendour than before ; the dissolution of monasteries, and the raids of the Puritans, are the only sweeping acts of sacrilege recorded in English history, whose mischief has never been adequately repaired. The advance of Church music must also be reckoned among the things which materially, though indirectly, affected and must always aifect, ecclesiastical architecture. It is true that we hear of no singing galleries, and organ lofts, stretched across noble tower arches, or over the place of the most sacred mys- teries, until the seventeenth century ; 2 but from the coming of Augustine there have been music and singing, which demanded appropriate arrangements in our churches, 3 and glorious an- thems which have brought down from the fretted roofs tones in unison with heaven's own music. James the deacon of Pauli- nus, at York became celebrated for the success with which he taught Church music, at the little village of Catteric; and far greater men thought not their labours ill bestowed in the same task. 4 Benedict Biscop brought with him from Italy, John, precentor of the use of copper for roofing, a still lighter material than lead, but in some respects far inferior to it. Among other presents sent from Alcuin to Eanbald, was a cargo of copper, to be used in roofing the bell tower at York, which Alcuin wished to be completed in the handsomest style then known. — Churton's Early English Church, p. 189. 1 The pall, which is a small piece of undyed woollen cloth, worn over the shoulder of an archbishop, has been supposed to have been intended to check the rising vanity of the prelate, when he beheld the gold and jewels, the rich clothes of glorious colours of his archiepiscopal vestments. 2 In Roman Catholic countries these desecrations are as frequent and as obtrusive as in England. 3 A part of the triforium of Glou- cester cathedral is still called the min- strels' gallery, and there is a stone gallery separating the choir from the lady chapel at Ottery S. Mary, which had probably the same use. In the Cathedral of Canterbury, as left by Prior Conrad, the organ stood on the vault of the south transept : and after- wards on a large corbel of stone in the same transept. — See Willis' Canter- bury, pp. 39, 107. 4 Putta for instance, Bishop of Rochester, when his See had been sacked, took refuge with Sexwulfus, Bishop of Lichfield, and there taught Church music. % 80 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. of S. Peter's, and abbot of S. Martin's, and with great care caused the brethren of his monasteries to be instructed in the Roman method of singing ; nor did the good man fail to reap the fruits of his zeal for the music of the sanctuary : for in his last long illness when he was unable to lift his voice in the song of praise, he would call to him several of his brethren at each set time of prayer, and making them sing psalms in two com- panies, would himself sing with them, and thus make up by their voices for the weakness of his own. Bede, the worthy pupil of Benedict Biscop wrote a work de Musica, and he, too, found wings for his own soul in the hymns of his brethren. "0 glorious King, Lord of power," — they sang in the anthem for Ascension day, (a.d. 735) on which high festival he died, — "who triumphing on this day, didst ascend above all the heavens, for- sake not us orphans, but send down upon us the promised Spirit of truth." At the words " forsake us not " he and all with him burst into tears ; but the voice of more cheerful praise yet again broke out at his end ; for turning towards the church and resting his head on the hands of his attendants, he desired to be supported in that position, that he might look towards the place where he used to sing, " Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghost," and when he had named the Holy Ghost, his spirit took its flight. Nor must we forget how Church music elicited a song, the only one which he is known to have composed, from the lips of Canute the Great. " A ballad which he composed," says Sir Francis Palgrave, 1 " continued long afterwards to be a favourite amongst the common people of England. It chanced that, when navigating the Ouse, near the Minster of Ely, the sweet and solemn tones of the choral psalmody fell on his ear, and Canute burst forth with his lay — " Merrily sung the monks within Ely, When Canute, King, rowed thereby. Row, my knights ; row near the land And hear we these monke's song." There can of course be no comparison between the music of those days and our own, in artistic character j but we have 1 Anglo-Saxou History, p. 319. THE SAXON PERIOD. 81 already the introduction of an instrument which was in time to effect a great revolution in the music of the sanctuary. The first introduction of the organ into church services is attributed to Pope Vitalian, who consecrated Theodore Archbishop of Can- terbury, in 668, but the first mention of an organ in England, occurs in a poem of Adhelm, (who died 709,) De laude virgi- num, in which he describes it as a mighty instrument with innu- merable pipes, blown with bellows, and enclosed in a gilded case, and far superior to all other instruments. 1 Among other provisions for the service of his church at Ramsey, Aylwin gave thirty pounds for an organ. 2 In the tenth century, one of enormous size was erected at Winchester : seventy men working alternately in two companies, supplied it with wind. Even this must have been greatly inferior in size, as well as in perfection, to the noble instruments now occupying the loft across the choir arch of our cathedrals, and interposing (whether happily or no,) their huge dark outlines in the view from the western entrance towards the east window. This instrument, which we now by an irresistible association connect with the edifice of the church, almost as naturally as the steeple or the bells ; and with the ser- vice of the church quite as constantly as the daily prayer, and the accustomed festival ; has deserved this sacred association by the power which it has given to the expression of those high spiritual feelings, which almost demand the language of music, — of a deep and appropriate harmony, — to give them utterance: and we may certainly say that there is no instrument, that there is no easily managed combination of instruments, which can at all vie with the organ as an accompaniment to the religious lauds 1 " Si verb quisquam chordarum respuit odas, Et potiora cupit, quam pulset pectine chordas ; Quis Psalmista pius psallebat cantibus olim, Ac mentem magno gestit modulamine pasci, Et cantu gracili refugit contentus adesse : Maxima millenis auscultans organa flabris, Mulceat auditum ventosis follibus iste, Quamlibet auratis fulgescant csetera capsis."— Basnage, torn. i. p. 715. 2 " Triginta prseterea libras ad fabri- candos cupreos organorum calaraos erogavit, qui in alveo suo super unara coclearum denso ordine foraminibus insidentes, et diebus festis follium spi- ramento fortiore pulsati, prsedulcem melodiam et clangorem longius reso- nantem ediderunt." — Historia Rama- siensis, cap. 114. 82 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. and praises, to the deep supplications and moving litanies, which are heard from many accordant voices in the service of the Church. But it has affected the science quite as much as the practice of church music. Not only has the system of counterpoint been greatly advanced by its use, but the character of compositions for the Church must have been greatly modified by it in many respects not so readily defined. How great must be the differ- ence of the feeling with which a master sits down to compose for such an instrument from the feeling of the same person writing for one of less scope and power ; and even were the feel- ing the same, how much greater the limits within which he may expatiate. He becomes a greater man, working upon a greater scale. 1 The last thing that we shall mention as exercising a great, though indirect influence on church architecture in all succeed- ing ages, is the introduction of Bells as part of the furniture of the church. That bells were applied to their present ecclesiastical offices even before the erection of parish churches in England there can be no doubt. Bede, speaking of the death of S. Hilda, which took place at Whitby, a.d. 680, tells us " that one of the sisters named Bega, in the distant monastery of Hackness, while she was in the dormitory, on the night of Hilda's death, on a sudden heard in the air the well-known sound of the bell, which used to call the sisters to prayers, when any one of them was being taken from this world ; and opening her eyes she saw as she thought the top of the house open, and a strong light pour in from above. Looking earnestly into that light she saw the soul of the departed Abbess attended towards heaven by angels. She told her vision to the sister who presided over the monastery, who assembled the sisters in the church, where they were engaged in praying and singing psalms for the soul of S. Hilda, when the messengers came to report her death." Other notices of the use or gift of bells soon became frequent. Turketul, of whom we have already made honourable mention, 1 The influence here attributed to and degrading custom which has ob- the organ in elevating the character of tained in the churches of the Roman sacred music, may be illustrated by Catholics. I mean the employment of the opposite effect of a most wicked ca.strati in the choirs. THE SAXON PERIOD. 83 gave to Croyland a great bell, called Guthlac, and afterwards six others which he called Bartholomew and Betelin, Turketul and Tatwin, Pega and Bega. " Non erat/' says Ingulphus, " tunc tanta consonantia campanarum in tota Anylia — there was not then such another " ring of bells " in all England. And if not in all England, certainly not in the world, for the English alone have ever known the use of a "ring of bells." Dunstan, who doubtless himself cast them, gave bells to many of the churches in Somersetshire. And bell-ringing made a part of his rule, in the reformation of monasteries ; for he directs " that at mass, nocturns, and vespers, from the Feast of Innocents to the Cir- cumcision, all the bells should be rung, as was the custom in England." 1 There can be no doubt that a rule so congenial to the feelings of the people 2 was pretty generally obeyed, though perhaps we may not find it frequently mentioned. However, in the History of Ramsey we have a story which not only mentions the bells, but connects them especially with the western tower of that church. 3 Archdeacon Churton tells us that the Bell-rock, now remark- able for its lighthouse, is so called from the bell, which the monks of Aberbrothock 4 tolled to warn the mariner of his dan- ger as he sailed past. 5 At the murder of Thomas a Becket, the bells are said to have rung of their own accord. 1 Life of S. Stephen, abbot, p. 3. 2 Bells are sometimes inscribed " GRATUM OPUS AGRICOLIS." Lingard quotes a passage from Ethelwold to the same effect. " Nec minus ex cipro sonitant ad gaudia fratrum iEnea vasa, cavis crepitant quae pen- dula sistris." 3 " Quadam itaque dierum cum pe- dissequo suo ad spatiandum de more exeuntes, ad restes campanarum majo- rum, quae in occidentali turri ecclesiae pendebant, e trabibus accurrerunt. Quarum unam tam diu imbecillium virtutum tenera lacertorum trahentes agitabant, quousque obortam in ea subito ex motu insequali fracturce rimulam maleridus in secretis sonus stridulus indicaret." Lingard also quotes a passage from Alcuin which shows that the tower at York contained more than one bell. " Videtur condignum ut domuscula cloccarum stagno tegatur propter or- namentum etloci celebritatem." 4 ! • When the rock was hid by the surge's swell, The mariners heard the warning bell ; And then they knew the perilous rock, And bless'd the abbot of Aberbro- thock.'' — Southey. 5 Early English Church, p. 120. 2 84 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Paul de Caen, first abbot of S. Alban's after the Conquest, furnished the tower with bells. " A certain English nobleman named Litholf, who resided in a woodland part of the neighbour- hood, added two still larger and more laudable than the rest. Having a good stock of sheep and goats, he sold many of them, and bought a bell, of which, as he heard the new sound when suspended in the tower, he jocosely said, ' Hark ! how sweetly my goats and my sheep bleat ! ' But his wife procured another for the same place, and the two together produced a most sweet harmony, which, when the lady heard, she said, " I do not think that this union is wanting of the Divine favour, which united me to my husband in lawful matrimony, and the bond of mutual affection." 1 In later times we still find the gift of bells thankfully recorded. Bishop Hythe placed four bells in the tower of Rochester Ca- thedral, which he called Dunstan, Paulinus, Ithamar and Lan- franc. Edward III., about 1347, built for S. Stephen's Chapel in the Sanctuary, a strong clochard of stone and timber, covered with lead, and placed therein three bells, since usually rung at coronations, triumphs, funerals of princes, and their obits. Of these bells some fabled that their ringing soured all the drink in the town ; more, that about the biggest bell was written, — " King Edward made me Thirtie thousand and three. Take me down and wey me, And more shall ye find me." 2 And we have the following curious account of the once celebrated bells at Osney, in Fox's Monks and Monasteries. " At the first foundation, there were but three bells, beside the Saint and Litany bells ; but by Abbot Leech they were increased to the number of seven. The bells were christened, and called by the names of Hauteclare, Doucement, Austyn, Marie, Gabriel, and John : all which, for the most part, towards the suppression, being before broken and recast, had gotten new names, which, by tradition, we have thus : Mary and Jesus, Meribus and Lucas, New Bell and Thomas, Conger and Godston ; which Thomas, 1 Buckler's S. Alban's, p. 5. 2 Stow's Survey of London. THE SAXON PERIOD. 85 now commonly called ' Great Tom of Christechurch/ had this inscription not long since remaining upon it, ( In Thomce laude resono Bim Bom sine fraude' and was accounted six feet in dia- meter, which is eighteen feet in compass." To these more matter-of-fact materials we might add a great deal about the consecration of bells, and their supposed virtue, but we will turn to a more practical matter, the antiquity and use of the campanile or bell-tower. The use of the bell-tower was recognized in the ancient Saxon law, which gave the title of Thane to any one who had a church with a bell-tower on his estate. Of the equally ancient application of towers to the pur- pose of hanging the bells, we have an elaborate and most inter- esting account in Mr. Petrie's work on the Round Towers of Ireland. In England the campanile is generally attached to the church, or at most stands a few yards from it. There are several round towers in Norfolk and Suffolk, which owe their shape in all probability to the peculiar building materials of those counties ; but it is worthy of remark that in two of our most interesting Saxon churches, Brixworth and Brigstock, both in Northampton- shire, we have a semicircular tower rising together with the bell- tower, and forming a staircase to it. There are detached bell- towers at Chichester, East Dereham in Norfolk, Glastonbury, and Bruton in Somersetshire, Evesham in Worcestershire, and several other places; and many have doubtless been destroyed, as those in Old S. Paul's Churchyard, and at Salisbury ; the latter was taken down at the close of the last century, the bells of the former contribute a chapter to the history and fate of sacrilege. " In the reign of King Henry VIII. there was a clockier or bell-house adjoining to S. Paul's Church in London, with four very great bells in it, called Jesus-bells. Sir Miles Partridge, a courtier, once played at dice with the king for these bells, staking a hundred pounds against them, and won them, and then melted and sold them to a very great gain. But in the fifth year of King Edward VI., this gamester had worse fortune when he lost his life, being executed on Tower-hill, for matters concerning the Duke of Somerset." 1 1 Stow's Survey. 86 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Since we can hardly claim for clocks, as separate from bells, sufficient interest, as connected with architecture, to occupy a place by themselves, I shall briefly allude to their introduction in this place. Sun dials were used by the Saxons, and by them placed upon churches, as appears from the instance already mentioned of Kirkdale Church ; but Dante is the first who mentions an horologe which strikes the hour, i.e. a clock as opposed to a dial. Dante died in 1321, and before that time we have a curious re- cord of a clock in England. Radulphus de Hengham, who was then chief justice of the King's Bench, was fined eight hundred marks, 16 Edward I., a.d. 1288, for having altered a record, whereby a poor defendant was made to pay 6s. 8d. instead of 13s. 4d. Out of this fine a clock was placed in the clock-house near Westminster Hall, which might be heard by the courts of law. An inscription was added commemorating the event, and conveying a lesson to all future judges: "Discite Justitiam Moniti." 1 And this clock was considered in the reign of Henry VI. of such consequence, that the king gave the keeping of it with the appurtenances, to William Walsby, Dean of S. Stephen's, with the pay of six pence per diem, to be received at the Exchequer. The clock-house stood in a ruined state till 1715, but the clock had given place to a dial, the inscription still remaining. We also find a notice of a church-clock at Canterbury, and from the price it can hardly have been a dial. " Anno 1292, novum orologium magnum in ecclesia pretium £3Q. 3 ' 2 In Rymer's Fsedera there is a protection of Edward III. (1368,) to three Dutchmen, under the title, "De Horologiorum Artificio exercendo." And Chaucer (who died in 1400) writes, " Full sikerer was his crowing in his loge, As is a clock, or any abbey orloge." 1 This case Justice Southcote re- not to build a clock-house."— Anec- membered, when Catlyn, chief justice dotes from Camden Society, of the King's Bench, in the reign of 2 Dart's Canterbury, quoted from Elizabeth, would have ordered the ra- Daines Barrington's Observation on zure of a roll in the like case, which Clocks, in Vol. V. of the Archaeologia, Southcote utterly denied to assent to which I am indebted for what is unto, and said openly, that " he meant here adduced on the subject of clocks. THE SAXON PERIOD. 87 The clock being in all probability a bell, but the orloge being certainly a clock, and that too one that struck the hours. I shall mention one other instance. Richard of Wallingford was the son of a smith, who from his learning became Abbot of S. Alban's in the reign of Richard II. When his fortune had now become considerable, he was desirous of displaying in some work, the greatness not only of his genius, but also of his learning and of his marvellous skill. And to this end he con- structed, with great labour, at greater cost, but with art far sur- passing both, a clock, the like of which is not to be found in all Europe, for the exactness with which it points out the course of the sun and of the moon, the rising of the fixed stars, and the ebb and flow of the sea. And lest this marvellous piece of ma- chinery should be spoiled by the clumsiness of monks, or by their ignorance of its construction, Richard himself wrote a treatise upon it. This clock continued to go in Leland's time, who was born towards the close of the reign of Henry VII., and who gives the above account of it and of its artificer. This notice of bells and clocks is not disproportioned to the influence which their introduction has had on ecclesiastical ar- chitecture. It is to the use of church-bells that we are indebted for the most prominent feature of almost every ecclesiastical fabric, and that which serves most to harmonize all the parts of a whole, sometimes so vast and almost always so various as a Gothic church. From the low central tower of a Norman abbey, but just rising above the roof, at the intersection of the cross, to the lofty towers or spires of Boston, Gloucester, Salisbury, Coventry, Louth, or Whittlesea, in whatever part of the church it may be placed, the steeple still gives an inexpressible grace and dignity to the whole outline, correcting immoderate length, reducing all minor parts to proportion, giving variety to same- ness, and harmony to the most licentious irregularity. The judicious use of the tower or spire is a great part of the secret of the characteristic boldness in minor details of the mediaeval architects. The little excrescences of such a building as York Minster, which are now lost in the grand whole, would at once become deformities, if the towers were removed. The Cathedral of Milan is in some respects one of the most splendid buildings in the world ; but for want of a steeple of proportionate elevation 88 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. it is but a gigantic grove of pinnacles, in which statues seem to have lost their way, and to be wandering without aim and with- out end. If, as is most probable, the central tower of Fountains had perished before the present northern tower was erected, what a heavy mass of irregularities must that splendid pile have seemed. The tower reduces all to proportion, and makes it once again a whole. Bolton Abbey had also suffered the loss of its tower, and that at the west end was never raised above the level of the nave, and though it is far smaller and less irregular than Fountains, what a long unrelieved length it presents to the eye. "What is it which gives such vastness and importance to the cathedral, such grace and beauty to the parish-church, at a distance, but the tower or spire ? Nay, what is it but the bell- gable which in mere outline often distinguishes the retired chapel from some neighbouring barn ? And for all this we are indebted to the introduction of bells ; or if not for the existence of these or the like additions to the beauty of outline in our churches, yet at least for what is a part of their beauty, — their having a use, and being exactly adapted to their use. The last circumstance indirectly affecting the sacred structure to the close of the Gothic period that I shall mention, is the in- troduction of the custom of burying the more illustrious dead within the church. This custom was introduced by S. Cuthbert, in 740. Eadmer tells us how Cuthbert, when he went to Rome to receive the pall, being endowed with great wisdom, obtained from Pope Gregory that all future Archbishops might be buried within their church of Canterbury : for heretofore they had been buried in the churchyard of the church of SS Peter and Paul, without the city; for the Romans, who were first sent into England, had said that the city was for the living and not for the dead. But S. Cuthbert was grieved to think, that after death he must be separated from his church and his children, that were in life the delight of his affection ; at his request therefore, and with the consent of King Eadbrith, it was ordained by the Pope that the Archbishops of Canterbury should be buried in their own church, that they might have their resting- place where they had ruled in honour. 1 Cuthbert himself en- ' See Willis's Canterbury, pp. 2 and 45. THE SAXON PERIOD. 89 joyed this privilege, and so did almost all his successors. And so great was the importance assigned to this privilege, that it altered in various ways the plan and fabric of our great churches, and of Canterbury perhaps more than any other. For a great number of the Archbishops of that See were canonized after their death, and then these places of sepulture became chapels with their separate altars, and all the furniture requisite to their greater honour. And so far had the reverence for their relics and other memorials extended in the time of Anselm, that although Lanfranc, his immediate predecessor, had wholly re- built his cathedral, the Abbots Ernulf and Conrad, with Anselm's counsel and assistance, rebuilt the choir on a very much larger scale ; and additional chapels and shrines were still perpetually added ; and these, with the tombs of the Archbishops, were held of so great importance, that Gervase, in his description of the church as it was before the fire, apologizes for his minute ac- count, not by the splendour or importance of the choir which had perished, but by the necessity of stating the resting-places of the several saints whose bones were preserved within it. We shall see by-and-bye how great a change in the same church was exacted at the rebuilding, by the fact that Becket was there buried : nor can we at all proceed with our history, without men- tioning many records of the places of sepulture of great and holy men, whose burial affected the fabric within which it was solem- nized. At last it became the custom for Bishops and other persons of importance to erect sepulchral chapels for themselves, during their lives, and these proved gorgeous appendages to the church, though too often at a great cost of general effect : for they interposed their screen-work in all directions ; filled up the spaces between columns ; cut off the ends of aisles ; and left the church without a single uninterrupted vista to any distant part. Thus what at first exacted enormous splendour in the general design, at last obscured the beauty of the whole, and left it doubtful whether ecclesiastical architecture was on the whole indebted to S. Cuthbert for introducing the custom of burials in churches. 90 CHAPTER VI. The Norman Period. Introduction of the Norman Style. — Edward the Confessor and Westminster Abbey. — Harold and Waltham Abbey. — William the Conqueror and Battle Abbey. — Gundulf, Bishop of Ro- chester. — Wulstan, Bishop of Worcester. — Three Duads of Ecclesiastical Builders. — Robert and Hubert Losing: — Wal- kelyn and his brother slmeon s — roger and his nephew Alexander. — The Freemasons. The style now called Norman was fully established on the Con- tinent long before the twelfth century, and there is every reason to suppose that the English did not wait to receive it as a part of the yoke imposed on them by their conquerors. There had already been sufficient intercourse with the Continent 1 to make it almost certain that any improved style of ecclesiastical archi- tecture which arose beyond the seas, would be adopted here. Edward the Confessor was educated in Normandy, and dis- played his partiality to foreigners, and to foreign ways and in- stitutions to such excess, as to excite popular tumults among his subjects. It is certain that he enriched foreign abbeys at the expense of his native land, for he was the originator of the per- nicious system of alien priories ; 2 and we may fairly allow him the credit of having in some degree atoned for the mischief, by introducing a better style of church building, 3 which doubtless 1 And with Normandy in particular, though this is of little comparative im- portance, for the Norman type of Ro- manesque was not confined to that duchy. 2 Pernicious, not only directly, in depriving England of a portion of its ecclesiastical revenues, but indirectly, in affording continual opportunities of robbing the Church, and the first ex- cuse for that wholesale sacrilege which was afterwards extended to all ecclesi- astical property. 3 Bosham Church and Westminster Abbey are represented in the Bayeux Tapestry ratber as Norman than Saxon THE NORMAN PERIOD. 91 appeared to the greatest advantage in his favourite and magnifi- cent foundation of Westminster Abbey. The greatness of Edward's reputation was fatal to the fabric on which he had bestowed his last regards. Revered as he was as a tutelar saint of England, he seemed to deserve a better shrine and a better monument than the Norman pile which he had piously dedicated; and this was removed by Henry III. to make way for the glorious abbey which now occupies its site. The foundation of Harold at Waltham remains, however, in some of its features, to prove that the Norman style was intro- duced before the Conquest. Harold, too, had been a traveller in Normandy ; and though he was a most unwilling guest at Eu, this would not prevent him from imitating the more gorgeous style of ecclesiastical architecture which was there fully estab- lished. There was already a church at Waltham, with an endowment for two priests, founded by Tovy, standard bearer to King Canute ; and Edward the Confessor gave to Harold certain lands on condition of his building a monastery on the spot, and furnishing it with the requisite relics, vestments, and ornaments, in memory of the Confessor and Edith his queen. This grant was made in the memorable year 1066, and Harold at once ful- filled the terms of the grant, rebuilding the original church, which was then consecrated to the Holy Cross, and endowing it as a convent for a dean and eleven secular black canons. Among the ornaments which he gave to the new foundation were seven little caskets (scrinia) with the relics, three of gold, and four of silver gilt, enriched with gems ; four great thuribles of gold and silver ; six great candlesticks, two of gold and four of silver ; three large vessels of Greek workmanship, silver, and richly gilded ; four crosses of gold and silver, studded with gems ; another cross of silver, weighing fifty marks ; five suits of vest- ments ornamented with gold and precious stones ; five other vestments enriched in like manner, one of extreme weight and cost ; two copes, covered with gold and gems ; five chalices, two of gold and three of silver; four altars, with relics, one of gold, buildings ; but too much stress should Norman needle would certainly follow not be laid on this, for these designs the style most in vogue at the court of cannot be taken as views, and the the good Duchess. 92 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. and three of silver gilded ; a silver horn ; and various other articles. In this church, thus erected, and munificently adorned by him, "Harold infelix" 1 offered up his prayers before his en- counter with William, and in this church he was buried within a year of its erection. 2 It thus becomes a national monument of no slight interest, and as an architectural work it is important as the last foundation of any note before the Conquest. In style it is Norman of a very early type. The pillars are cylindri- cal, with cushion-shaped capitals, deeply indented ; and some of the shafts have the same dancette and spiral lines on their sur- face which are found at Durham and Norwich, which were in progress within the last quarter of the eleventh century, not many years, that is, after the foundation of Waltham. We may reasonably presume that this part of our history was far from being devoid of church builders, and that their works were numerous and important, not only from the general ad- vance that had been made in arts, and from the comparative repose that followed the reign of Canute, but also from the effects of a remarkable error into which all western Christen- dom had fallen touching the approach of the end of the world, at the close of the tenth century, followed by a natural return to more than usual activity in the foundation of permanent in- stitutions, when the fear or the hope of the impending doom was dispelled. Mr. Hope, in his historical essay, somewhat overstates the effect of this when he says, that there are more churches whose foundation can be traced to the eleventh century, when people had begun to awake from their fears of a world in ashes to the business of life, than to any other time of equal duration ; but certainly we must admit that these expectations of prolonged existence would influence, and did influence many to erect churches, who had hitherto felt that this and every such work was unnecessary ; nor must it be forgotten, that the reli- gious bodies when they recommenced their labour of building, were enabled to expend in it that increased wealth, which they owed to the numerous grants which had been made to them, 1 This is said to have been his only 2 These notices of Waltham are taken epitaph. from "Select Views of London," &c. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 93 appropinquante mundi termino — because the end of the world is now nigh at hand. 1 William the Norman conquered under a consecrated banner, but he respected the churches little more than the civil institu- tions of his new subjects. In making the new forest he " is reported to have destroyed twenty-six towns, with as many parish churches, and to have banished both men and religion for thirty miles in length, to make room for his deer. And in Lent-time, in the fourth year of his reign, he rifled all the mo- nasteries of England of the gold and silver which was laid up there by the richer of the people to be protected by the sanctity of the places from spoil and rapine, and of that also which be- longed to the monasteries themselves, not sparing either the chalices or shrines." 2 Spelman, in whose words I have related the sacrilege of the Conqueror, also notes how the Church was avenged, not by her own arm, but by the Hand of God on the spoiler and his house. William was cursed in all his sons. With Robert he was engaged in an unnatural war. On his death-bed he was forsaken by his children, and his funeral was not unattended by fearful signs. All his four children were wretched in their life and in their end. Robert was deprived of his eyes, and then imprisoned by William, till his death ; and he had the additional unhappiness of sur- viving his only son, who was slain in the new forest. Richard, the conqueror's second son died also in the new forest, from the fall of a tree ; William Rufus also in the new forest met his death, and on the very spot where a church stood which the conqueror had destroyed, and left no child behind him. 3 " The fourth son" of William, says Spelman, " abstained (as I imagine) from hunting in the new forest, but God met with him in another corner ; for having but two sons, William legitimate and Richard natural, they were, in the fifteenth year of his reign, both drowned, with other of the nobility, coming out of 1 See Mosheira, x. ii. 3. coal burner, whose descendants, of the 2 Spelman's History and Fate of same name and occupation, still re- Sacrilege, main in the new forest. — See Miss 3 This will appear the more remark- Strickland's Lives of the Queens, Vol. able when it is recorded that Rufus I. p. H6. was found dead by one Perkiss, a char- 94 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. France ; and himself dying afterwards without issue male, in the year 1135, gave a period to this Norman family." The Conqueror was not, however, wholly occupied in destruc- tion. For the repose of the souls of those who fell at Hastings, and we may presume for the peace of his own conscience also, he founded the Abbey of Battle, which soon became one of the greatest of our monasteries, and which is in many respects among the most interesting historical memorials in the kingdom. There are, however, many such foundations which we must be content with barely mentioning ; and now, resuming the plan which we have so largely followed already, we will pursue our history in the life of some of the most eminent church builders of their time. In the days of William I. of England lived Gundulf, 1 the builder of the two castles of the Tower of London and of Rochester, and also of the Cathedral church in the latter city. He was a Norman by birth, a man of venerable conversation, a cleric from his boyhood, then a monk, and at length a Bishop ; regulating his clerical life by the monastic rule, and adorning his monastic conversation with the dignity of the episcopate. While yet a youth he attracted the attention and gained the af- fection of William Archdeacon and afterwards xirchbishop of Rouen ; and the two friends made a pilgrimage together to the holy city, that having visited the places of the Incarnation, Pas- sion, and Ascension of our Blessed Lord, they might ever after have a more cheering recollection of those sacred events. Lovers of the heavenly country, they arrive, after many dangers, at the earthly Jerusalem ; they pour forth their prayers on the spot which our Lord had pressed with His feet, and kiss the place where the cross was raised, where He was buried, and whence at last He ascended into heaven. They suffered much on their return, and Gundulf especially was so worn with travel, that one day his companion left him behind unwittingly, and did not miss him till a nobleman of the party all at once observed his absence, and running back found 1 This account of Gundulf is chiefly ensi cosetaneo. Published in Anglia extracted from Vita GundulfiY Epis- Sacra, Vol. II. copi Roffensis, authore Monacho Roff- THE NORMAN PERIOD. 95 him unable to stand, and resigning himself to death. The good nobleman took him on his shoulders, and bore him to his com- panions, by whose care he recovered. But the greatest peril of the pilgrims was in a storm at sea. In their extremity they vowed that they would assume the mon- astic habit if they escaped. Gundulf accordingly became one of the brethren of Bee, Herluin the founder being still alive. His virtues were soon observed and rewarded, and he became sacris- tan of the Church of the Blessed Virgin at Bee, an office of no great rank, but one which he held invaluable for the part that it implied in all sacred offices. Here sprung up a friendship between Gundulf and a still more eminent man. Anselm entered the monastery in the same year with Gundulf, and was so charmed with his conversation, that it was among his first wishes he should be accounted another Gundulf, and Gundulf another Anselm. Anselm, who was more deeply read in the Scriptures, was the more frequent speaker ; Gundulf, who had the tenderest spirit, wept most. The one planted, the other watered ; the one uttered divine discourses, the other deep sighs. Anslem would sometimes say to Gundulf, " You are always seeking to sharpen your knife on my whet- stone, but you never suffer me to sharpen my knife on your whetstone : speak, I beseech you, that I too may profit by you ; for indeed so dull am I from the multitude of my sins, that I ought rather to take the place of the whetstone, while you in your earnest and constant devotion continue always sharp, in your contemplation of the divine perfections." 1 When Lanfranc was made Abbot of Caen, he associated Gun- dulf with himself in the cares of his new office ; and when, after the Conquest, he became Archbishop of Canterbury, because even in secular affairs, Gundulf s industry and wisdom were re- markable, he made him the steward of his household. The reputation of Gundulf, as well for wisdom as for sanctity, in- creased daily ; and at length, through the influence of Lanfranc, he was made Bishop of Rochester, and enthroned (March 19th, 1077) amid universal acclamations. 1 An allusion to the words of Ho- Reddere quae ferrum valet, exsors ipsa race, de Arte Poetica, 304. secandi. Ego fungar vice cotis, acutum 96 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. It would be wrong to conceal the fact that there was some- thing more than a desire to give a worthy Bishop to Rochester which determined Lanfranc in this choice. We have already seen in the time of Dunstan, the commencement of very grievous attacks upon the secular Clergy by the monastic bodies ; and Lan- franc, imbued with the spirit of one of the most rigid orders, was bent on hurrying the secular Clergy to their fall. The chapter of Rochester had hitherto been composed of secular canons, and it was agreed upon between Gundulf and Anselm, that in the event of Gundulf s consecration, they should be replaced by a convent of monks. With this understanding certain possessions of the church of Rochester, which had been held by the Arch- bishop of Canterbury, were restored, and fit preparations were made for the reception of the larger and wealthier body. The old church, 1 which was almost in ruins, was taken down and a new one commenced, the monastic buildings surrounding it at convenient distances ; and the work was concluded within a few years, partly by the munificent donations of Lanfranc. 2 When all was done, some of the five Clergy, which was the whole num- ber found there, took the habit, and others being added to them, the number of monks soon amounted to upwards of sixty. However pure the intentions of such men as Lanfranc and Gundulf must have been, we cannot but observe that this was direct oppression and robbery of one order, for the aggrandize- ment and wealth of another. It is but one case of hundreds, and it is also a part of a system which was afterwards terribly avenged on the monastic bodies. They enriched themselves then at the 1 "A bishopric, with a college of secu- lar priests, was founded at Rochester, in the reign of Ethelbert, the Anglo- Saxon King of Kent, soon after Au- gustine the monk had landed in the Isle of Thanet, and preached the Gos- pel at Canterbury. The college was endowed with land, southward of the city, appropriately named Priestfield, but its revenue was small. A church was begun to be erected in a.d. 600, and was finished four years after, when it was dedicated to the honour of God and the Apostle S. Andrew. Rochester was almost destroyed in the year 676 by Ethelbert, King of Mercia, and the city suffered greatly during the inva- sions of England by the Danes, in the ninth century ; but it appears to have recovered its importance in the reign of Athelstan, when there were three mint masters, two who superintended the king's coinage, and one who su- perintended that of the Bishop." — Winkles' Cathedrals, I. 105. 2 The greater part of the nave still remains, to attest the excellence of Gundulf's taste and skill. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 97 expense of the secular Clergy, and added the direct sacrilege of appropriations ; and soon their wealth excited the cupidity of princes. The plunder of monasteries had become a regular sys- tem in the reign of Henry V., and was, as is sufficiently well known, carried on by several persons, on pretence of founding- other religious houses, (the very pretence used for the suppres- sion of the secular Clergy and the seizing of their temporalities,) until the time of the great spoiler, Henry VIII. ; meanwhile the monastic bodies had begun to suffer, at the hands of the mendi- cant friars, precisely the same attacks on their reputation, which they had so uncharitably cast on the secular Clergy from the time of Dunstan. The historian of ecclesiastical architecture, however, if he could forget the moral question, and the baneful effects on the spirit- ual Church of any oppression and wrong, might be disposed to rejoice at the victory of monachism ; for it is certain that we owe our finest buildings to a system which concentrated enormous wealth in a few great fraternities, whose means, and whose re- quirements all tended to the erection of vast and splendid edifices. Even the villages which were robbed by them of their parson, and of a great part of their wealth, that the "high monastic tower " might soar yet higher, were a little repaid by better and more costly repairs and additions to their parish church, than it would otherwise have had. The church of Rochester being now finished, Gundulf went with a great procession of monks and Clergy, and with a vast concourse of people, to the sepulchre of the blessed confessor Paulinus the third Bishop of Rochester, and translated the relics to a fit place prepared for them in the new church. Of Gundulf s demeanour at the sacred services his biographer speaks with deep admiration, but his piety was not dependent on the outward solemnities of public worship. When mass was ended he retired to a secret place, especially chosen as favourable to godly sorrow, for his private prayers : and such a cell he had in all his country houses, where his chamberlain was ordered to deposit his little book of devotions. And there, or anywhere, if perchance he heard any sweet sound, as of singing, or the church bells, he would say, as a sigh broke from him, " What must be the joys of heaven, where God's praise is ever sounding, H 98 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. when the hand or the tongue of man call forth such exquisite me- lody V 3 Lanfranc heard the praises of this eminent servant of God, and was delighted that such a man should have proceeded from his monastery. He often sent for Gundulf that he might have the pleasure of his society, nor did he let him depart empty, but sometimes gave him copes, sometimes precious candlesticks, but always some ornament or other for his church. Gifts indeed poured in from all sides. William Rufus added to the offerings made to the church of Rochester, and especially gave the manor of Lambeth as a compensation for the injuries which the church had sustained when Odo, Bishop of Bayeaux, was besieged in Rochester. It is sometimes impossible to say whether the Prelates or others to whom our ecclesiastical buildings are attributed, were the founders only, or the architects also of the buildings which bear their names. This, however, is not the case with Gundulf, who was celebrated as an architect in his own day. William I. had employed him in the erection of the white tower in London; 1 and the chapel there, dedicated to S. John the Evangelist, but now used as a record office, is one of the most remarkable re- mains of Norman architecture. He also restored the castle and the walls of Rochester ; and we subjoin the substance of an ac- count of the way in which he became charged with the latter work, from the Textus Roffensis, attributed to Ernulf, Gundulfs contemporary, and after the seven years' episcopate of Radulf, his successor in the See of Rochester. " How King William II, at the instance of Lanfranc, granted and confirmed to the Church of S. Andrew, at Rochester, the manor of Hedenham, for the table of the monks, in consideration 1 Stow, in his Survey of London, says, " I find in a fair register-book, containing the acts of the Bishops of Rochester, set down by Edmond de Hadenhara, that William I., surnamed Conqueror, built the Tower of Lon- don ; to wit, the great white and square tower there, about the year of Christ 1078, appointing Gundulph, then Bishop of Rochester, to be principal surveyor and overseer of that work, who was for that time lodged in the house of Edmere, a burgess of Lon- don ; the very words of which mine author are these : ' Gundulphus Epis- copus mandato Willielmi Regis magni praefuit operi magnse Turris London, quo tempore hospitatus est apud quen- dam Edmerum burgensem London, qui dedit unum were Ecclesia? Ro- fen.' " THE NORMAN PERIOD. 99 of which Bishop Gundulf built the tuhole of the stone castle of Rochester at his own charges. " Another benefit, moreover, and not less worthy to be had in remembrance through all ages, did Bishop Gundulf of blessed memory, confer upon them, viz., the castle which is situated in the pleasantest part of the city of Rochester, which he erected in consideration of the royal confirmation to his church of the manor of Hedenham. For Archbishop Lanfranc could not give this manor to the Church of Rochester, as he had determined to do, to furnish the table of the monks, without the king's per- mission ; because the king's father had granted it to him only during his own life, when he was raised to the archiepiscopate. When, therefore, William II. succeeded to the throne, he de- manded a fine of £100 for the renewal of the grant ; which, when the Archbishop and Bishop heard they answered in great consternation, that they neither had so much money in hand, nor knew where they should get it. Now there were two noble- men, friends of both the prelates, Robert son of Haimo, and Henry Earl of Warwick, who, consulting the king's honour on the one hand, and on the other the good of the Church, pro- posed to the king, that as Gundulf had great science and skill in architecture, 1 he should erect a stone castle in Rochester at his own charges, instead of paying a pecuniary fine. When this was told to the two prelates, they were still more amazed, and declared that they would rather that the manor was at the bot- tom of the sea, than that they should purchase the king's grant on such terms, as would burden the church of S. Andrew with a charge for ever ; for if the castle should fall out of repair, the church or the Bishop would be held responsible. The Earl of Warwick was moved to some impatience by this reply, and said, ' Hitherto I have held my Lord of Canterbury to be one of the wisest of men, and even now be it far from me to call him a fool, and yet I cannot here discern the proofs of that wisdom in which he used to abound ; for surely it would be no great hard- ship to build a castle at the expense of some j£40 at the most, and when the sheriff or under-sheriff of the county, or others 1 Episcopus Gundulfus, quia in opere csementario plurimum sciens et effi- cax erat. H 2 100 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. whom the king may appoint, have certified that the work is finished according to the contract, the king will doubtless hold the Bishop and the Church absolved for ever/ The Archbishop at length consented, and the agreement having been concluded, Gundulf finished the whole, at a cost of about £60." The castle thus erected is one of the most remarkable Nor- man fortresses in the kingdom. It is described at great length by Mr. King, in his observations on ancient castles, published in the Arch apologia, 1 but I shall be contented here with the much shorter notice of it by Rickman. " The style is Norman, and it presents a fine specimen of the modes adopted at the date of its erection, to enable a very small number within the castle successfully to resist a much greater number of besiegers ; for this the access, the various successive gates, and other defences, are admirably adapted. The masonry, in the interior, is very good, particularly that of the well, which is in one of the walls, and was accessible from several floors of the castle. 2 Gundulf had no taint of feudal violence in his character, though he was the architect of two royal keeps. The last hours of the good Bishop were as touching as his life had been holy and use- ful. As his health declined, he stript himself of his worldly goods, to enrich his brethren. But his episcopal ring remained, the sign of his dignity, and for this he sought a worthy posses- sor. There was a priest named Radulf, his friend, and a friend of Anselm beforetime, who came to visit him in his sickness. Holding the hand of Radulf, he slipped the ring into it ; and when Radulf starting at the gift would have refused it, as not belonging to his order, Gundulf insisted on his accepting it, saying that it would be useful to him by and by. At the hour of his departure the brethren of his order were around him singing the eightieth Psalm, and as they came to the words, " Turn Thee again, Thou God of hosts, look down from heaven, behold and visit this vine," his spirit departed committing to God the charge of the vine that he had planted, i.e. ; the Chris- tian Church which he had brought together. Anselm having honoured the obsequies of Gundulf with his 1 Vol. IV. 2 Rickman's Gothic Architecture, p. 187, ed. 4. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 101 presence, anxiously turned his thoughts to the election of a worthy successor. His choice fell on Radulf, who then for the first time understood the secret meaning of the gift which he had received from Gundulf. The merits of Gundulf passed into a proverb, and he was made in after times the rule by which others were judged. Thus of Bishop Gilbert who died 1314, Edmund de Hadenham says, " that we may include all in a word, whatever good and noble works Gundulf had laboured to perfect in his lifetime, Gilbert with equal diligence laboured to destroy." (Anglia Sacra, i. 352.) And again of John de Bradefield, who died 1 283, he says, " the monks fondly hoped, before his election, that he would prove a second Gundulf, but he was changed into quite another man, and proved himself a follower of Gilbert." (ib. 352.) This history of Gundulf might afford occasion to many profit- able reflections. We shall only add, however, that refreshing as it is to read of holiness and devotion in any age, we find in the record of the times to which we have now gone back, so much violence against which holiness had to struggle, so many errors with which devotion was endangered and was tainted, that we may well be thankful for our own happier lot — thankful, but not self-complacent, unless the fruits are proportionate to the milder showers, more refreshing dews, and warmer and more constant suns, under the influence of which we dwell. The life of Wulstan, 1 Bishop of Worcester, the builder of his own cathedral church, is not less interesting than that of Gundulf. He belongs to an earlier era of British history, though his great architectural work was not commenced so soon as that of Gundulf. Wulstan was born at Long Itchington, in the county of Warwick. His youth was full of presages of his future piety, and in a.d. 1062, he was elected Bishop of Wor- cester, and consecrated by Aldred, Archbishop of York. He had before been a monk in the monastery of the same city, and was accredited as having already wrought a miracle like one at- tributed to S. Dunstan, and which we adduce for the same reason, for which that was mentioned — its bearing on the sub- 1 The authority here followed is the life of Wulstan by William of Malmsbury. 102 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. ject of our history. There was a bell-turret being erected on the top of the church, and while the labourers were at work on the scaffold erected for this purpose, one of them fell, but was delivered from his danger by the sign of the cross made by Wulstan in the air. He consecrated his first church to the Venerable Bede, that he might render the first-fruits of his ministry, under God, to the prince of sacred literature in Britain. He built churches in all the farms belonging to his bishopric, throughout the diocese, and did all he could to induce others to erect them on their own estates. At Westbury (from whence it will be remembered that Oswald transplanted twelve brethren to Ramsey), there was already an ancient church, but it was half unroofed and half destroyed : this he perfectly restored, rebuilding the walls, and covering the roof with lead. 1 He was not one of those prelates who displayed their charity and devotion in erecting palaces and country-houses for themselves ; and indeed he was not easily reconciled to too costly a style of ar- chitecture even in sacred edifices ; for he feared lest it should minister more to human pomp and pride, than to the grace of God. This feeling was very visible on the day when he com- menced the destruction of the old church of Worcester, which had been erected by S. Oswald, that he might replace it with one of greater splendour. 2 He stood in the churchyard sad and silent, and often uttering a deep sigh, until at last his emotion found relief in a fiood of tears. "We, wretches that we are," said he, " destroy the works of the saints, vainly believing that we shall replace them with better. How much greater was S. Oswald, who built this church, than we ! How many holy re- ligious men have served God within its walls \" And though those who stood by bid him rather rejoice that God had ac- counted him worthy to dedicate a fairer church to His honour, he 1 " Parietes csemento, tectum plurabo reficiens." 3 "S. Oswald had completed a church dedicated to S. Mary, in 983, in which there were no less than eight and twenty altars. While erecting this church, S. Oswald used frequently to preach in the open air, to crowds of people, near the cross which had been erected over the grave of Wifrid, Duke of the Wiccii, in the space before S. Peter's Church. This ca- thedral was ravaged by the soldiers of Hardicanute in 1041, and it probably remained in a state of desolation till Wulstan commenced a new cathedral in 1084." (See Winkles' Cathedrals, iii. 51.) THE NORMAN PERIOD. 103 still remained in tears, and some say that he then predicted the fire by which, afterwards, the church he was erecting should be destroyed. 1 He finished the new church, however, with the utmost care and cost, so that there was not a decoration which could be mentioned which was not to be found there, so wonder- fully perfect was it in the whole and in every part. And that there might be no instance of splendour wanting, he expended seventy-two marcs of silver in enriching a shrine, made by S. Oswald, in which he placed the relics of S. Oswald his pre- decessor, and of several other saints. The only parts of the present cathedral of Worcester which can be fairly assigned to Wulstan, are portions of the great or western transept, and the crypt. The former has no characters of sufficient interest to be mentioned here. The crypt is thus described in " Winkles' Cathedrals/' " It is under the choir, and extends from the eastern wall of the greater transept to a point under the tomb of King John, but, if its apse were opened, it would extend to the centre of the eastern transept. Its primary grand divisions are into a nave and aisles, the nave having a semicircular termination, now walled up, and being divided itself into four aisles by three rows of columns, with plain but bold bases and capitals : the aisles of the nave are also subdivided into two each, by a single row of columns of the same description. To the south a second aisle is attached, divided also in the same manner. The vaulting of the whole is very plain, massive, and semicircular, and springs at once from the capitals of the columns before mentioned." 2 Wulstan was a favourite with the Saxon historians, as one of the great ornaments of their race when it was rapidly passing away ; and it is to this partiality, doubtless, that we owe the report of a miracle by which his worthiness to fill the episcopal throne was attested. Lanfranc was disposed to deprive him of his See, as he had done other native prelates, and summoned him to resign his staff, the sign of his investiture. Wulstan came as he was required, to Westminster, and there, before the shrine of Edward the Confessor, whose name was the great watchword of the Saxons, he declared how unwillingly he had first received the episcopal staff, and how readily he would resign it, if it In a.d. 1113. 2 Winkles, iii. 58. 104 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. were the will of God that he should do so. Then striking his staff into the shrine, he exclaimed that to S. Edward who had committed it to his unworthy hands he now restored it. Lan- frane came forward to take the staff, but it refused obedience to his grasp. His attendants tried with equal success : at length Wulstan was intreated to resume the staff, which yielded to his lightest touch. Another miracle is said to have occurred at his death, with the like moral. The ring, which he wore as the sign of episcopal investiture, could not be removed from his finger, and it was buried with him. It is easy to recognize here the spirit of a conquered nation, adhering with a just tenacity to the champions of their old rights, and to all their memorials. It is the same spirit which made the Saxons despise even what was superior to themselves in their Norman conquerors. Nothing, however, could be more decided than this final vic- tory of Norman over Saxon art. Whether we believe or disbe- lieve the earlier introduction of the Norman style of ecclesias- tical architecture, of its universal adoption from the Conquest downwards there can be little doubt : still less doubt can there be that it well deserved the preference which it acquired. If Gundulf be taken as representing the aggressive Norman, and Wulstan the Saxon, yielding, however unwillingly, we have but representations of the two races in this as in all the other arts of life. The rest of the ecclesiastical architects of the pure Norman period that I mention, I shall arrange for the sake of historic interest in connexion with one another : and the two Losings, of Hereford and of Norwich ; the brothers Walkelyn of Winchester, and Simeon of Ely ; and Roger, Bishop of Salis- bury, and Alexander of Lincoln, his nephew, will afford three interesting duads. The Cathedrals of Hereford and of Norwich are indebted for the oldest portions of each to two prelates of the same name, Robert and Herbert de Lozinga. The first was Bishop of Hereford, from 1079 to 1107; and according to the authorities collected by Godwin, he was greatly skilled in philosophy, rhe- toric, music, arithmetic, and the rest of the mathematics. It was greatly to the credit of both prelates, that he and Wulstan of whom we have just spoken, though of hostile races, were united by the most endearing offices of friendship. Of this William of Malmsbury gives an affecting instance. Wulstan THE NORMAN PERIOD. 105 lay sick at Worcester, his Norman friend was absent on impor- tant affairs in the king's courts. The dying Bishop appeared to Losing and said distinctly, " If you would see me alive, hasten to Worcester." The king's consent was obtained, and night and day the anxious Bishop travelled, that he might receive his brother's blessing, and close his eyes. He had reached Crick- lade when Wulstan again appeared to him, and said, " You have done all that love could prompt you to do, but in vain, my soul has already left the world ; but take heed to your own life, for you shall not be long behind me : and lest you should doubt, behold a sign ! when you have committed my body to the earth, you shall receive a parting gift, which you shall recognize as mine." Losing had concluded the last duties to the deceased, and had set spurs to his horse to depart, when the prior, falling on his knees before him, presented the parting gift, saying, " Take, I pray thee, the cloak of lamb's-skin which he who loved you used to wear when he rode out. It will be a lasting memo- rial of your mutual affection, and may assure you of the protec- tion of the holiness of our Lord." The departing Bishop received the gift with much emotion, and calling the brethren around him, related to them what had passed, and bid them ob- serve how exactly the event agreed with the prediction. Then he went away, and filled alike with thankfulness for the warning, and anxiety for the event, lived till the June following, only surviving his friend five months. This connecting link between two persons, who are also con- nected in the course of our history by the zeal and skill which each displayed in the erection of a cathedral, seemed of too great interest to be passed over. We find Robert Losing connected also, but less closely, with the founder of the present cathedral of Lincoln ; for Remigius having finished that church, invited Losing to be present at the consecration, which, how- ever, he declined, giving as a reason that he read in the stars certain indications that the day proposed would be inauspicious. He was himself, however, engaged at the very time, in the re- storation of his own cathedral, which had been built first by Ethelstan, but had been burnt to the ground by Griffin of Wales. In this work be proposed to himself a foreign model, and the Cathedral of Hereford was erected after the pattern of 106 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. that which Charlemagne had built at Aix-la-Chapelle. 1 This work was brought to a conclusion by Bishop Losing's successor before 1115. To this fabric belong the pier arches of the nave. The west end has been built up in the worst possible taste. In Bishop Losing's design, the nave and aisles which were enriched with arcades and intersecting arches were flanked with square turrets, surmounted by plain spire-like pinnacles. The central door was deeply recessed and richly moulded, and over it were (probably three) round-headed windows, 2 and the high-pitched gable was doubtless surmounted by a cross. In the reign of King John, after the close of the Norman era, Bishop Giles Bruse destroyed the western gable, and carried up a tower to the height of one hundred and thirty feet, over the two western bays of the nave. This tower occasioned by its fall in 1786 the de- struction not only of the two bays of the nave on which it rested, but of four arches beyond. The repairs were unfortu- nately committed to Mr. Wyatt, that indefatigable destroyer of our cathedrals, 3 who unhappily attained a reputation for know- ledge of ecclesiastical architecture, at a time when the better spirit of restoring our cathedrals in their original style was first to any degree carried into execution. If Ecclesiology had her Rhadamanthus, Wyatt would now Sisyphus-like be engaged in the endless toil of pulling down all that he ever built up, and building up all that he ever pulled down. Herbert de Losing bought the bishopric of the East Angles of William Rufus for £1900, and for his father the Abbey of Winchester for j81000, 4 simoniacal purchases for 1 Eodem ipso tempore quo Remi- gius Lincolniensem, suam ille de novo construxit (quam nimirum condiderat olim Ethelstanus, sed incendio Griffi- nus Wallus deleverat, quo tempore ab illo interemptus Leovegarus Episcopus occubuit) et ad exemplar Aquisgra- nensis a Carolo magno extructse, efformandam curavit. — (Godwin de prsesulibus, p. 480.) I am not able to say how far a comparison of the two fabrics, now or at any time here- tofore, would justify this assertion. 2 For these windows one large Per- pendicular window was substituted much to the injury of the effect, perhaps also of the stability of the whole composition, in the fifteenth century. 3 See Glossary, Winkles, and the print in the original edition of Dug- dale, for the dates and character of this portion of Hereford Cathedral. 4 " Qua de re," says Godwin, (p. 426,) " sic lusit illorum temporum poeta : " Surgit in ecclesia monstrum genitore Losinga, THE NORMAN PERIOD. 107 which he was cited to answer at Rome, and was condemned as a penance to build certain churches and monasteries. 1 At his consecration in 1091, he found his diocese without a fixed cathedral : for sometimes the Bishop's throne had been erected at Elmham, in a little church of wood [in sacello liyneo] some- times at Thetford, or at any other place which the Bishop might appoint for the time. This inconvenience he determined to avoid by building a church worthy to be the cathedral of the diocese at Norwich. Having purchased a site in a place called Cowholm, he erected the cathedral at his own cost, and adorned it with all manner of ornaments, dedicating it in the name of the Holy Trinity, He built also dwellings for the monks, apart from the Bishop's palace, of which he laid the first stone in 1086, bearing this inscription, " Herbert, the Lord Bishop, laid this first stone, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen." After this he erected a palace for himself and his successors, at the north side of the church, which he is said to have kept separate from the cells of the monks, that their minds might not be distracted from heavenly contemplation by the bustle of men coming and going. 2 He built also other churches (Simonidum secta, Canonum virtute resecta) Petre nimis tar das, nam Simon ad ardua tentat : Si prsesens esses, non Simon ad alta volaret. Proh dolor, ecclesise nummis ven- duntur et sere. Filius est Prsesul, pater Abbas, Simon uterque. Quid non speremus si nummos possideamus ? Omnia nummus habet : quod vult facit, addit et aufert. Re nimis injusta, nummis fit prsesul et abba." 1 If we accept the account of Bar- tholomew de Cotton (see Wharton's Anglia Sacra, Vol. I., p. 407,) Her- bert was a most finished courtier, and a most perfect gentleman. " Erat quippe vir omnium literarum tarn sae- cularium quam divinarum imbutus scientia, facundia incomparabili, ve- nustus corpore, jocundus aspectu, ut solo visu plerunque a nescientibus quod esset Episcopus deprehenderetur. Mentis quippe gratia radiabat in vultu, et morum tranquillitas corporis offi- cium suo famulatui subigebat." We are not however disposed to admit the monk's apology for the simony of the Bishop. " Mihi tamen videtur, quod excusatur per Apostolum dicen- tem, redimentes tempus, quia dies mali sunt : et per Decratalem qui dicit, quod licitum est clerico emere jus ecclesise suae de manu laici, si aliter habere non possit." 2 " vEdem cathedralem suis sumpti- bus construxit, area coempta in loco quem veteres Cowholm appellarunt, et ornamentis abunde instructam, sacro- sanctse Trinitatis nomini dicavit, ac 108 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. among which were one on the hill opposite to the cathedral, on the other side of the river ; that in the Bishop's Court ; that at Ehnhain ; one at Lenniam, and one at Jernemut, all which he gave to the monks for ever. The foundation of the cathedral was laid in 1096, and at Herbert's death the choir with its aisles and side chapels, the transepts and the tower were finished; and the nave, if not of his work, which seems most probable, is at least finished according to his plan. To the tower has since been added, however, pinnacles and a lofty spire ; and to the choir a noble clerestory of early Perpendi- cular character, the work of Bishop Goldwell ; and the whole church has been subsequently vaulted. The east end in its original form, that is, as Herbert de Losing left it, afforded a remarkable combination of circular and apsidal forms, the chancel ending in a semicircular apse, and the two chapels attached to its sides being each composed of two intersecting circles, of different diameters, with a round projection at the point of intersection ; while another apsidal appendage occurred at the east of the north transept. 1 Of the size of these portions of the church of Losing, perhaps an adequate idea will be con- veyed by the fact that one of the side chapels, though a mere appendage to the great mass against which it rests, is now used as a parish church. The interior, as it was finished by Losing, or at least after his designs, is extremely imposing. Entering at the west, fourteen compartments of the nave, the base of the central tower, and four compartments of the choir intervene between the door and the circular apse. The arches are throughout of monachis etiam habitacula [seorsira ab Episcopalibus] eedificavit, primo lapide a se anno salutis 1086 posito, cui hsec verba dicuntur incisa : " Dominus Herbertus posuit pri- mum lapidem, in nomine Patris et Filii, et Spiritus Sancti. Amen." "Sibi turn et successoribus palatium extruxit ab Aquilonari parte ecclesiae, cpiod a monacborum cellulis ideo dici- tur secrevisse, ut bominum buc et illuc discurrentium tumultu, mentes illorum a coelestium rerum contem- platione non abstraherentur." — God- win de Prsesulibus. 1 Tbe east of Canterbury, before the fire in 1174, presented nearly the same assemblage of circular forms, but the towers of S. Andrew and of Anselm, with their apsidal chapels, attached to the side of the greater apse, like the chapels of Jesus and S. Luke to that of Norwich, were circular only at their east end. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 109 the heaviest type of Norman, and rest on massive square piers, the edges of which are broken with shafts and pilasters ; except where one pair of piers near the middle of the nave gives place to cylindrical pillars, enriched with spiral flutings. The trifo- rium, to which Mr. Hope 1 attaches the same importance in fixing the expression of any church possessed of triforia, with the eyes in the human countenance, is nearly a repetition of the lower arcade on which it rests, except that the zigzag is substituted for the billet ornament in the outer member of the arch mouldings : above this is the clerestory of three arches in each compartment, the middle arch, however, being of three times the span of the outer ones ; thus carrying up to the roof, in some degree, the effect of the unusually wide and open triforium arcade. 2 This arrangement, so far as the triforium is concerned, is very characteristic of great antiquity. It is found at Waltham, built, as we have already seen, before the Conquest. It is rather remarkable for grandeur than beauty, and appears with the best effect in the eastern apse. In its original condition a flat painted ceiling of wood panels most probably covered the whole of this vast length ; now the roof is groined, and in addition to this change the clerestory of the choir is wholly altered from its original character; but though it is impossible to deny that the present lofty pointed windows, occupying the length and circuit of the choir, with lantern-like lightness and radiance, and the fine vaulting spanning the whole space are exquisitely graceful, it is as difficult to doubt that the circular apse with its three arcades, each of harmonious though less delicate forms, had a beauty of its own which amply sustained the glory of Norman architecture, and give to Herbert de Losing a place second to none among the ecclesias- tical architects of his day. 3 Two brothers, Walkelyn, Bishop of Winchester, and Si- 1 Description of Christ Church in Transactions of Archaeological Insti- tute, p. 2. 2 In the naves of Peterborough, Ely, and Winchester, as the latter was left by Bishop Walkelyn, the tri- forium consists of arches which bear a very considerable proportion to those of the lower arcade, but they are in each case filled with two subsidiary arches, and their central pillar. 3 Dugdale. Winkles. Glossary. An- glia Sacra, I. 110 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. meon, Abbot of Ely, laid the foundation of their respective churches ; the central towers of which had a kindred fate, both falling, probably from imperfect construction, as William of Malmsbury insinuates with respect to the former. The resto- ration of Ely, after the fall of its tower, will afford one of the most interesting passages of a future chapter. Walkelyn's work at Winchester which was not limited to the tower, will appear with a new face at the close of the four- teenth century, under the auspices of William of Wykeham. The early part of its history I shall relate in the words of Professor Willis, whose masterly account it would be presump- tion to attempt to rival, and affectation either to alter or to leave unquoted. "In the year 1079, Bishop Walkelin began to rebuild the church of Winton from the foundations ; and (in 1086) the king was induced to grant him, for the completion of the church which he had begun, as much wood from the forest of Hanepinges as his carpenters could take in four days and nights. But the Bishop collected an innumerable troop of carpenters, and within the assigned time cut down the whole wood, and carried it off to Winchester. Presently after, the king passing by Hanepinges, was struck with amazement, and cried out, Am I bewitched? or have I taken leave of my senses ? Had I not once a most delectable wood in this spot ? But when he understood the truth, he was violently enraged. Then the Bishop put on a shabby vestment, and made his way to the king's feet, humbly begging to resign the episcopate, and merely requesting that he might retain his royal friendship and chaplaincy. And the king was appeased, only observing, ' I was as much too liberal in my grant, as you were too greedy in availing yourself of it.' "In the year 1093, in the presence of nearly all the bishops and abbots of England, the monks removed from the old church (monasterium) of Winchester to the new one, with great rejoicing and glory, on the sixth idus of April (April 8). And on the feast of Swithun (July 15) they made a procession from the new church to the old, and brought thence the feretrum of S. Swithun, which they placed with all honour in the new church. And on the following day the bishop's men first began to pull down the old church, and it was all pulled down in that year except one apse (portions) and the great altar. In the next year, 1094, relics of S. Swithun and of many other saints were found under the altar of the old church. " The venerable Walkelin, of pious memory, died in the year 1098. He greatly improved the church of Winton in devotion, in the number of its monks, and in the buildings of the house. He caused the tower THE NORMAN PERIOD. Ill of Winton Church to be made as it is still to be seen, and rebuilt it, with its four columns, from the foundations in the middle of the choir. His venerable body is buried in the nave of the church, before the steps under the rood-loft (pulpitum) in which stands the silver cross of Stigand, with the two great silver images ; and he lies at the feet of William GyfTard, Bishop of Winchester, having over him a marble stone, with these verses engraved thereon : 'Prsesul Walklynus istic requiescit humatus Tempore Willelmi Conquestoris cathedratus.' " When King William Rufus was slain by the arrow of Walter Tirrel in the New Forest, (a.d. 1100,) his body was brought to Winchester, and buried in the Cathedral church, in the middle of the choir. It was laid in the ground within the limits of the tower, in the presence of many nobles, but with the tears of few. Some years afterwards (namely, in the year 1107) the tower fell, which many thought to have been a judg- ment for his sins ; and because that it was a grievous wrong to bury in that sacred place one who all his life had been profane and sensual, and who died without the Christian viaticum — Thus Rudborne : Malmesbury cautiously declines to give an opinion upon this matter, because, as he says, it may have been after all, that the structure would have fallen from the instability of its workmanship, whether the body had been buried there or not." 1 The last of our proposed duads are Roger, Bishop of Salisbury, and his nephew Alexander, Bishop of Lincoln, with whom in general history is associated Nigel, Bishop of Ely, another nephew of Roger of Salisbury. This Roger, if ancient scandal is to be trusted, was chaplain to Henry I., and commended himself to the good graces of a bad king, at war with his brother, by the rapidity with which he hurried over the service of the mass ; and we are constrained to admit that the character of the man was not altogether alien from such submission to the habits of a camp. However, he rose rapidly to favour, and to places of high trust, and used his influence with the king to enrich both himself and his kinsmen. His natural son, Roger, he made chancellor of Eng- land, his nephews Alexander and Nigel, Bishops of Lincoln and Ely, and for himself he reserved the throne of Salisbury. 2 He was among the first to embrace the cause of Stephen ; but if 1 Archaeological Institute, Transac- 2 " And thus it seems there are tions, pp. 17, 18, 19. other gates to enter into the temple than 112 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. the neglect of the claims of the Empress by Roger be accounted a sign of ingratitude to Henry, it was well repaid by the hard measure which he received at the hands of Stephen ; a piece of retributive justice with which we should have had no concern, had it not been connected with the bishop's building propensities. At the beginning of his reign, Stephen had thought it desir- able to strengthen himself against foreign invasion, by suffering his friends to build and fortify castles ; but when he no longer feared an enemy from without, he looked with jealousy on these doubtful defences of his sovereignty, and determined on dis- charging them. It is said that 1117 castles were erected within a short space ; not a few by bishops, and by Roger of Salisbury more perhaps than by any other individual. On a castle at Devizes he expended enormous sums, and scarcely less on others at Malmsbury and Shirburn, 1 and in addition to this he repaired the castle of Salisbury, and surrounded it with a wall. " In these places," says Malmsbury, " he erected vast edifices at enormous cost, and of great splendour, but all this was merely a matter of degree ; it is more important that he is the first who is recorded to have built of close jointed and carefully wrought ashlar, with so nice a disposition of the stones, that the juncture escapes the eyes, and the whole masonry deceives one into the belief that it is of one stone. To avoid the envy, and to wipe out the stain of these military works, he founded two monasteries, and filled them with religious (though it does not appear what these monasteries were) ; and he also restored his church of Salisbury, and greatly orna- mented it, so that it was second to none in England for beauty, and far superior to most." 2 that which is called Beautiful, which, with the other avenues, have not improperly been thus specified : — ' 4 Quatuor Ecclesias portis intrabit in omnes, Ca;saris, et Siraonis, Sanguinis atque Dei. Prima patet magnis, nummis patet altera, charis Tertia, sed paucis quarta patere solet." — Staveling on Churches, p. 182. 1 Of all these, a few slight remains at Shirburn are all that exist at present. 2 '' Fecit his in locis (inquit Malmes- buriensis) sedificia spatio diffusa, nu- mero pecuniarum sumptuosa, specie formosissima : ita juste composito or- dine lapidum, ut junctura perstringat intuitum, et tota maceria unum men- tiatur esse saxum. Ad tollendam ejus extructionis invidiam (ut loquitur New- brigiensis) et quasi expiandam macu- lam, duo instituit coenubia et collegis THE NORMAN PERIOD. 113 But the antidote was less powerful than the poison : these ecclesiastical works failed to divert attention from his for- tresses. The king suspected, or pretended to suspect, the fidelity of the three kinsmen, and contriving a quarrel, seized Roger and Alexander, who were prevailed upon to surrender their castles of Newark, Salisbury, Shirburn, and Malmsbury; but Nigel had fled to Devizes, which he determined to hold against the king. Stephen hastens to Devizes, carrying with him the captive bishops, and Roger, lately chancellor, the son of the Bishop of Salisbury. He erects a gallows in the sight of the castle, and in presence of his father, sentence is passed on the younger Roger, to be remitted only on the surrender of the castle. Nigel, incredulous of the savage purpose, refuses to submit, and the youth is brought out with the rope round his neck, and made to ascend the scaffold. The father, to save the life of his innocent son, takes an oath that he will neither eat nor drink till the castle is given up. The youth descends from the gallows, but the father endures a three days' fast, before his nephew will yield. The castle was destroyed, but not till the king had secured enormous wealth there laid up as in an impregnable fortress ; and Roger of Salisbury soon after died (Dec. 4, 1139) of a broken heart, having first offered on the altar of his church, the small remainder of his wealth. The gift was not respected, and Stephen, not the church, was the richer. Alexander of Lincoln, the same whom we have found listening with so great attention to the history and prophecies of Merlin, the builder of Stonehenge, was consecrated in 1123 ; in the year following his cathedral was burnt down by accident, and he rebuilt it, guarding against a similar accident by vaulting it with stone; 1 as great a benefit to confer as the greater splen- dour of his uncle's masonry at Salisbury. He built also four religiosis implevit. Qusenam vero ea fuerint, a nemine opinor traditum est. Sed deinde ecclesiam etiam suam Sa- risburiensem (Malmesburiensem audis) et novam fecit, et ornamentis excoluit, ut nulli in Anglia cesserit, sed multas preecesserit."— Godwin de Prsesulibus. 1 " Consecratus est Cantuarise vice- simo secundo Julii 1123. Anno deinde sequente ecclesia ejus cathedralis, nuper constructa et vix dum absoluta, fortuito incendio conflagravit, Quam refecit ille et contra similes casus munivit, laqueari addito fornicato." I 114 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. monasteries ; one for canons regular at Haverholme, another for white monks at Tame, one at Dorchester, and one at Sem- pringham. 1 But he bestowed his chief attention on the erection of castles, after the example of his uncle of Salisbury, whose consequent punishment, we have already seen, he in some degree shared. Banbury, Sleford, and Newark, owed their castles to Alexander. The lesson which Stephen so sternly taught was not thrown away upon him, and he retired from the ambitious turmoils of politics, and the active scenes of warfare, to the business of his see, and the adorning of his church, which he left more splendid than any other in England at that day. And here, to pass from individuals to a society, I may men- tion a circumstance which certainly produced a great, and on the whole a very beneficial effect on ecclesiastical architecture in this and many succeeding ages : — the rise of the " Free and ac- cepted Masons" as a guild of builders and architects, with all the advantages of a corporate and exclusive body, defended by papal charters, and supported by the most zealous and talented men of the several generations through which their history ex- tends. The history of this society is obscure, and the absurd pretensions of those who usurp their name in these days, with- out imitating their usefulness, go far to cast over it an air of ridicule. William Preston, himself a freemason of these later days, says with apparent gravity, " Ever since symmetry began, and harmony displayed her charms, our order has had a being a boast which would have been intelligible, though in a literal sense false, in the days of William of Wykeham, because then the order was conversant with symmetrical and harmonious forms; but which is now as absurd as it is of course untrue : it can adumbrate nothing but satire, and assert nothing but what is false. Almost equally absurd is the deduction from the existence of masonry of the existence of masons, as a guild or secret society. The same high authority just quoted argues that his order existed in England before the invasion, because there are remains of some stupend- 1 Godwin and his authorities, p. 284. He was not however in this a free im- parter of his own wealth to the church, if Giraldus Cambrensis maybe trusted, who says, " quatuor ex terris ecclesiee suae et redittibus, tanquam unum al- tare spoliando, et alia vestiando, mo- nasteria construxit." THE NORMAN PERIOD. 115 ous works executed by the Britons before that time ; which is no less than to say that men cannot be masons without being- freemasons. Among the early patrons of freemasonry in Eng- land we are gravely told was our protomartyr, S. Alban, who not only advanced the wages of masons from one penny a day and their meat, to two shillings per week, and threepence for their cheer, but founded a lodge, of which he was himself the president. After this Augustine was grand master in England, and later still S. S within, 1 and other great men, (indeed it was impossible to have been pre-eminently great without being a free- mason,) and we pass in after generations to such men as Gundulf, Stapleton, Wykeham, Chichele, Henry VII., Wolsey, Gresham, Wren. All this is provoking, because its pretension to be called his- tory mystifies the whole subject, and leaves us more in the dark than if nothing had been written about it. With a little more show of reason the origin of freemasonry in England is referred by some to the year 674, or thereabout, when glass was first brought into the country ; and indeed thenceforward we trace clearly enough the communication of England with other countries, on all matters relating to archi- tecture ; and continental masons, who built more Romano, were chiefly employed, at least until they had initiated the natives in the " mysteries " of their craft. This would be perfectly con- sistent with the existence of a corporate body, such as the free- masons afterwards became ; but it would be equally consistent with the less forced presumption that the Romans excelled the English in the arts of life, and that artisans from Rome were consequently in request here. This however seems to be admitted on all hands, that in the tenth century a body of men calling themselves Freemasons, and claiming the right, under a papal privilege, of exercising their craft all through Christendom, and perhaps sometimes 1 Whether S. Swithin was a free- stroyed or ruined. He also built a mason or not, he certainly understood bridge on the east side of the city, and the art of making masons work. "He during the work he made a practice of was a diligent builder of churches in sitting there to watch the workmen, that places where there were none before, his presence might stimulatetheirindus- and repaired those that had been de- try."— Capgrave, quoted from Willis. i 2 116 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. rudely enforcing their sole right to be employed in sacred edifices, were known over Europe ; and though the unsettled state of this kingdom, while the Danes were yet formidable, would leave them little to desire here, yet probably before the Conquest, and certainly soon after, they were established in England under a local superior, with communication with a head of the whole order : l and so well did this system work, so far as the perfec- tion of the art which it fostered was concerned, that the sove- reigns of different countries rather gave force to the papal letters, than withstood the monopoly which they created. Indeed prac- tically the masons would remain sufficiently fixed to their own country, the intercourse being chiefly that which would equally benefit all parties, the mutual communication of improvements in the art which all professed. Such a state of things led at last to jealousies, which reached the royal ear, and in 1424, during the minority of Henry VI., an act 2 was made against the meetings of masons, because by 1 Hope gives a very picturesque description of the lodge which the masons established for the time, when they were engaged in any great work. " Wherever they came in the suite of missionaries, or were called by the natives, or arrived of their own accord to seek employment, they appeared headed by a chief surveyor, who go- verned the whole troop, and named one man out of every ten, under the name of warden, to overlook the nine others ; set themselves to building temporary huts for their habitation, around the spot where the work was to be carried on ; regularly organised their differ- ent departments ; fell to work ; sent for fresh supplies of their brethren, as the object demanded them ; often made the wealthy inhabitants of the neighbourhood, out of devotion, or commutation of penance, furnish the requisite materials and carriages, and the others assist in the manual labour ; shortened or prolonged the completion of the edifice as they liked, or were averse to the place, or were more or less wanted in others ; and when all was finished, again raised their en- campment and went elsewhere to un- dertake other jobs. Even in England, as late as the reign of Henry VI., in an indenture of covenants made between the churchwardens of a parish in Suf- folk, and a company of freemasons, the latter stipulate, that every man should be provided with a pair of white leather gloves, a white apron ; and that a lodge, properly tiled, should be erected at the expense of the parish, in which to hold their meetings.'' 2 "3 Hen. VI. 1424, cap. i. 'En primis come par les annuels congrega- tions et confederacies faite par les masons en leur Generate Chapitres assemblez, le bon cours et effect des estatutes de laboreurs sont publique- ment vioiez et disrompez en subver- sion de la laye, et grevouse damage de le commune, nostre seigneur le roi voillant en ceo cas pourvoir le remedie, par advis et assent susditz et a l'espe- THE NORMAN PERIOD. 11 such meetings it was alleged, ' the good course and effect of the statutes of labourers were openly violated and broken, in subver- sion of the law, and to the great damage of all the commons/ But this act was not enforced, and the fraternity continued to meet as usual under Archbishop Chichele. Humphrey, Duke of Gloucester, brother to the regent, and guardian of the kingdom in his absence, took the masons under his protection, and they continued not only to meet in safety, but were joined by the king himself; who, in 1442, was initiated into masonry, and from that time spared no pains to become master of the art. He perused the ancient charges, revised the constitutions, and honoured them with his sanction. The royal example was followed by many of the nobility, who assiduously studied the art. 1 We may be excused a smile at the vision of king and lords habited in leathern aprons, and engaged with square and trowel, or with chisel and mallet, mastering the art of masonry. In Scotland the masons had at the same time more substan- tial privileges perhaps than elsewhere. They were protected and encouraged by James I. of Scotland, who, after his return from captivity, became a zealous patron of learning and the arts. He honoured the lodges with his presence, and settled an annual revenue of four pounds Scots (an English noble) to be paid by every master mason in Scotland, to a grand master, chosen by the grand lodge, and approved by the crown. His office entitled him to regulate every thing in the fraternity which could not come under the jurisdiction of law courts ; and, to prevent law suits, both mason and lord, or builder and founder, appealed to him. In his absence they appealed to his deputy or grand warden, who resided next the premises. 2 This jurisdiction was cial request des ditz communes ait ordine et establi que tieux chapitres et congregations, ne soient desore tenuz, et si ascuns tielz soient faitz, soient ceux qi font faire assembler et tenir ceux chapitres et congregations, si ils soient convictz, adjugez pour felons ; et que tous les autres masons qui veig- nent as tielz chapitres et congrega- tions, soient puniz par emprisonement de le corps, et facent fyn et raunceon a la volonte du roi.' " I transcribe this statute from a pa- per of Governor Pownail's in Vol. IX. of the ArchaDologia, where there are some good remarks on the Freema- sons. 1 London Encyclopaedia. 2 Ibid. 118 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. the same in spirit, as that which Thomas a Becket claimed for the Church, and in a society with less than divine sanction, was most objectionable. The influence of this society on architecture must have been very great and very beneficial. But it seems more than proba- ble that in individual masons it tended to make architecture more of a craft, and less of a science. The term " mystery," where it means anything in the theory of such guilds, seems to shroud a little empiricism as well as to dignify a little science : and while it is beyond a question that the order was a mighty architectural corporation, and that it sent forth every where men competent, some to design, and some to execute great works ; yet it may be conceived that the great secret of the society re- sided in the practical way in which many principles after which we are now feeling in vain, and many rules of construction which each man now learns to apply by a mathematical process, were reduced to what is vulgarly, but expressively called " the rule of thumb." We are now measuring, and drawing, and striking circles, and ruling lines, over the plans and elevations of existing buildings of acknowledged beauty, to find the prin- ciple of proportions which their architects followed : perhaps they used some general formula, quite unconscious that a soul of beauty resided in it, which refused to be chained to any other form. We are amazed at the constructive science displayed in the erection of the roof of King's College chapel, and should hesitate to intrust such a work to any living architect, however renowned : perhaps John Wastell, the master mason who agreed " to make and set up a good, sure, and sufficient vault for the grete church," and who executed his agreement to the satisfac- tion of his employers, and the amazement of posterity, followed with, the utmost assurance, a rule of which he could not give a philosophical account, but which he was ready to apply again and again to works of every magnitude, from that which he had just finished, down to the canopy of a sepulchral chapel. If there is any truth in this supposition, the society rises in our estimation, as its members (I will not say sink, but) take a differ- ent position : and indeed it is almost inconceivable that the suc- cession of ages between Edward the Confessor and Henry VIII. could have produced a sufficient number of individuals capable THE NORMAN PERIOD. 119 of designing, except with some such helps, the vast number of exquisite buildings which we refer to those times. It has been observed again and again, that the marvellous uniformity of detail in structures of the same age, is owing to the general diffusion of freemasons, who carried with them every- where the same rules, the same forms, the same hands and tools to work with. This uniformity is indeed marvellous, but it is sometimes a little exaggerated. There is for instance a clearly national character in our own architecture, which distinguishes it from that of all other countries, both in the general character, and in the details of the buildings of the same age. Let the reader take up Mr. Petit's work on Architecture, and turn over the beautiful sketches, which give the character of the mass with wonderful force : he will at once exclaim, and in almost every instance with truth, This is foreign, this is English, before he has read the names. Again in detail : the Early English, though not exclusively, is chiefly ours. The Geometric we have in com- mon with other countries, and partially the flowing Decorated ; but this is deteriorated on the continent into Flamboyant, while it gives place in England to a decidedly different style. Nor are the mouldings and ornaments less distinct in character : there is indeed a general synchronism of like forms, but they are similar, not identical. An Englishman may be proud to say, that in all these instances he is thankful that we have had our own grand master, our own architect, our own masons, our own craftsmen ; for certain it is that we yield to no nation in Europe in the beauty, as distinct from size, in the elegance, as distinct from gorgeousness, of our cathedrals and parish churches. 120 CHAPTER VII. The Norman Period. S. Alban's. — The use of Brick. — Tewkesbury, Peterborough, Bury S. Edmund's, S. Paul's, S. Cross, Romsey, Rydal, Fountains, Faversham, Castor, Durham, and Bolton. — Destruction op Churches. — Worcester, Chichester, York, Bath, Fountains. — Violence of the ttmes. — Number of Churches. — Their general character. — Norman decorations. Throughout the last chapter, the builders of churches have been the most prominent object, though their works have some- times been partially described. In this chapter we will pay the principal attention to the fabric, not without some slight notices of those with whose names they are associated. It would be a work of immense labour, and would serve no good purpose, to enumerate every church, even of the first order, which was founded, or received additions about this time, and which still retains traces of the work of the reign of William or of his immediate successors. The following are some of the more remarkable. Paul de Caen, 1 whose name indicates his Norman origin, was the fourteenth abbot of S. Alban's. He greatly enlarged the church. His abbacy extended from 1077 to 1093, and he was succeeded by Richard de Albini, who con- cluded the work begun by his predecessor, and dedicated it in 1115. The parts of the abbey still remaining, which may be referred to this time, are the central tower, the antechoir, or baptistery, with its aisles, the transepts, six northern, and three southern compartments of the nave, from the east, with its aisles, and part of the aisles of the retrochoir. The style of these parts of S. Alban's indicates their very near approach to the Saxon era, for the baluster shaft, which is usually considered a feature of that style, occurs frequently. Roman bricks also 1 See chronological table in Corapa- Abbey-church of S. Alban, published nion to the glossary, and Guide to the by the S. Alban's Architectural Society. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 121 are freely used, the old military station affording materials near at hand : indeed a century before Abbot Ealdred had commenced the selection of stones and tiles from the Roman foundations, for the rebuilding of his church. There are also several parts of the work into which bricks, moulded for the purpose, are in- troduced, especially in the newels of the stairs, proving that the use of bricks was, sometimes at least, a matter of choice as well as of convenience with the Normans, and that they did not ac- count them unworthy to receive some elaboration. In this they followed the custom of foreign builders. The ancient Lombard architects used bricks abundantly, plain, moulded, and carved; and perhaps it is more remarkable that brick is so seldom used, than that it is sometimes found in ecclesiastical buildings in England. Some, for example, I may mention. The chancel of the Church of the Holy Trinity at Hull, which is of the fourteenth century, is probably the most ancient, as well as the most noble, specimen of ecclesiastical brick build- ing still remaining in England. It does not however stand alone. The churches of King's Lynn, 1 in Norfolk, mostly of the fifteenth century, are in great part of brick. The chancel of Greensted Church, in Essex, of which the nave has been already alluded to as a structure of wood, "is of red brick, and in the style characteristic of the latter days of Henry the Seventh's reign." 2 Of Leicester Abbey, " the most curious por- tion now existing is the outward brick wall, with an inscription worked into it in brick of a varied colour." 3 In the middle of the fifteenth century, Thomas Millay, librarian and registrar to Bishop Halse, built splendid houses of brick [splendidas cedes latericias. — Gul. Whitlocke, Hist. Lich. in Anglia Sacra, i. 454,] for the canons residentiary of Lichfield, at the west end of the pond, in the cathedral close. 4 All these instances are of plain 1 It will be observed that Lynn and Hull are both sea -ports, and may have borrowed a fashion from abroad. 2 Suckling Papers, — Weale. 3 Rick man. 4 Mr. Essex, in a paper in Vol. IV. of the Archseologia, has the following notices of middle and late Gothic buildings in which brick is used : — " Wall tiles, or bricks, were used in some of the buildings belonging to the Priory of Ely in the time of Edward II., and were made in the Flemish manner, but of different sizes, some being twelve inches long, six inches wide, and three inches thick ; others, ten inches or ten and a half inches long, five inches wide, and full two 122 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. bricks, but moulded brick was used in England' as well as on the Continent, and with so good effect that it is surprising its use did not become general. The best instances I have seen are in Norfolk, where the scarcity of stone led to the substitution of this material in richer buildings, as of flint in those where carved ornament was not affected. The rectory-house at Great Snoring, and East Barsham Hall, are very fine examples : the latter especially displaying the power of the material employed, the Gothic details being exceedingly sharp and good, and in point of character fully equal to the best stone work of their day. Both are of the reign of Henry VII. or early in Henry VIII. It is almost superfluous to add, that the purpose of this di- gression is to call attention to the use of brick as perfectly con- sistent with great beauty of design and execution in Gothic architecture. It is a great point to be able to make good use of the materials at hand, if better cannot be afforded, without disproportionate expense, or the sacrifice of some real advantage. Let us bring stone from Caen, if we can afford it ; but if not let us build even with the flint or rubble of our country, and if that be too expensive, or the district does not yield it, let us not hesitate to build, with correct designs, of common brick, for a good building need cost no more than a bad one. It must be confessed, however, that in the application of brick to all except domestic purposes, and in the extent to which moulding, or carving, or the variation of the surface by the position of the inches thick. They were used in building walls at King's Hall in Cam- bridge, in Edward III.'s time, at which time they were sold from 6s. to 6s. Id. the thousand, which in those days was a great price. In the twenty- third of Edward III., Edmund Gon- vile, rector of Terrinton and Rush- worth, in Norfolk, began to build a college in Cambridge, on the ground where the tennis-court and orchard of Corpus Christi College now stand, part of which is yet remaining, and is built entirely with bricks. They were used at King's Hall, in the same Uni- versity, in the time of Richard II., and sold at 6s. 8d. the thousand. In the reign of Henry IV., they were sold at 5s. 7|d. ; and in the reign of Henry VII., we find them mentioned in the accounts of King's College Chapel, by the name of ' wall tiles,' and they were used in the inside of the walls in the upper parts of that building. About that time they became the fashionable material for building, in- termixed with ornaments of stone, and have continued in use ever since under the name of bricks." THE NORMAN PERIOD. 123 bricks, or of the colour, by intermixing different kinds of brick, should be attempted, we must go to foreign buildings for our most valuable lessons. 1 S. Ambrogio at Milan, S. Zeno at Verona, and the Great Hospital at Milan, are three excellent examples of the primitive simplicity, the grace of form and co- lour, and the elaborate finish, of which brick is capable. 2 The Norman style has now reached its perfection, and until the transition period we should find no changes to mention, even if we entered into a more minute history of works erected be- tween this period and the reign of Henry II. Even for solidity of construction the churches built during the reigns of the two Williams and of the first Henry are by no means universally more remarkable than some later structures. The few names and dates that are here thrown loosely together may serve to connect the early Norman with the transition period, and the History of Architecture in England, with the general history of the country. Tewkesbury Abbey was built by Robert Eitz-Hamon who was buried in the Chapter-house in 1107. 3 The choir of Peterbo- rough was commenced in 1117 by John de Sais, the transepts were added between 1155 and 1177 by Abbot Waterville, and the nave was finished in 1193, all according to the original 1 Lord Lindsay has some good re- marks on the brick buildings of the Continent. Speaking of the Town- halls, he says, — " Some of these, as at Padua, Pia- cenza, &c., are of singular beauty, and, in the north of Italy especially, are frequently built of brick, which the Lombards used with a mastery of which, in England, we have no concep- tion ; every delicate architectural orna- ment is fashioned in this unpromising material, and the richness of effect is marvellous. It was even frequently applied to ecclesiastical purposes ; the beautiful Duomo of Cremona, with its adjacent dependencies, is entirely of brick ; so are the Churches of S. Francesco at Pavia, and the cloisters of the celebrated Certosa, between that city and Milan. The Palazzo Publico at Piacenza, and the palace of the Lombard Dukes at Pavia, are of the same material, and rank among the noblest edifices in Italy. Nor must I forget to mention, as belonging histo- rically, and indeed, in political geo- graphy, de facto, to Italy, the stupen- dous palace, or rather fortress, of the Popes, at Avignon ; — now, alas ! de- graded into a barrack; — a building by itself in every respect, and the noblest example, perhaps, anywhere extant of the old feudal architecture of Europe." Lord Lindsay on Christian Art, ii. 18. 2 See an admirable paper on the use of Brick, by the Rev. T. James, in the report of the Architectural Society of the Archdeaconry of Northampton, for 1847. 3 Glossary. 124 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Norman design, though in some contemporary works the pointed arch had been freely used \ so that this cathedral, with the ex- ception of the west front which is Early English, and the Lady Chapel which is Tudor, or late Perpendicular, presents a very noble and uniform example of the style of the twelfth century. The church and monastery of Bury S. Edmund's received many additions during this era. In 1032 a church of wood had been consecrated, in place of which a stone church was commenced by Baldwin the first Abbot after the Conquest. Under the Abbacy of Robert, the second of that name (1107 — 1112) the infirmary, the chapter-house, and the Abbot's hall, were built by the Sacrists; and between 1121 and 1130, during which time Anselm, nephew of the Archbishop of Canterbury of the same name, filled the Abbot's chair, the gate tower was erected by the Sacrists, 1 whose names are recorded, Radulphus and Herseus. About 1180, Sampson, then sub-sacrist, and afterwards Abbot, built the choir, and built or restored the great central tower, and finished the two western towers which were commenced a hun- dred years before. 2 1 The fabric of the church was es- pecially committed to the Sacrist : be- sides these instances here and elsewhere occurring in the text, we may add the following from the Successio Priorum Ecclesise Roffensis, in Anglia Sacra, Vol. I. p. 392—394. Osbern de Scapaya, formerly Sacrist, was made prior (1189). While in his former office he had erected the window at the altar of S. Peter. His successor (1199) Ranulf de Ros, while Sacrist, fecit bracinum, and the greater and smaller Prior's chamber, and the stone buildings in the Cemetery and Hos- telry, and the grange in the vineyard, and the stable. He also roofed the great church, and covered most of it with lead. William de Hoo (prior in 1 239) while Sacrist erected the whole of the choir of the church of Roches- ter, from the north and south aisles, out of the oblations at the shrine of S. William. 2 The following curious details are from the Chronicles of Jocelin of Brakelond : " Sampson the subsacrist, being master over the workmen, did his best that no breach, chink, crack, or flaw should be left unrepaired so far as he was able ; whereby he acquired great favour with the convent, and es- pecially with the cloister monks. In those days was our choir built under Sampson's direction, he ordering the designs of the paintings, and composing elegiac verses ; he also made a great draught of stone and sand for building the great tower of the church ; and being asked, whence he procured money for this work ? he answered, that certain burgesses had privily given him monies for building and completing the tower. Nevertheless, some of our brethren said, that Warin our monk, the keeper of the shrine, together with Sampson the subsacrist, had by concert between themselves THE NORMAN PERIOD. 125 In 1127 died Richard 1 Bishop of London, who had expended all his revenues on his cathedral church. Ten years after Henry de Blois, Bishop of Winchester, founded the church of S. Cross in that city; and to him is also attributed the design of the Abbey church of Romsey. 2 In 1139 died Thurstan Archbishop of York, who founded Rydal and Fountains ; and in 1154 King Stephen was buried at Faversham, which he had himself founded : and here, at the latest, ends the purely Nor- man era ; although many churches, some of which have been already noticed, were finished during the next reign, in perfect accordance with the designs of earlier founders, so as to exhibit few if any marks of the transition. In the erection of parish churches that age was not less in- dustrious ; and although we have seldom documentary evidence which would enable us to refer them to a particular date, as in the case of cathedral and conventual churches, yet their style often leaves no doubt of the reign in which they were erected. 3 And in some districts there is hardly a single church 4 which has not some portion or other which must be referred to the Norman era. pilfered some portion of the offerings to the shrine, in order that they might disburse the same for the necessary purposes of the Church, namely, for the building of the tower ; being the more ready to believe this when they saw that the offerings were expended for extraordinary purposes by others, who, to speak plainly, stole them. And these before-named two men, in order to remove from themselves the suspicion of such a favourable theft, made a certain hollow trunk, with a hole in the middle or at the top, and fastened with an iron lock ; this they caused to be set up in the great church, near the door without the choir, in the way of the people, so that therein per- sons should put their contributions for the building of the tower." 1 He is called William by mistake in Collier's Ecc. Hist. a See Mr. Freeman's paper in the Winchester vol. of the Transactions of the Archffiological Institute. 3 In one case, mentioned in the Companion to the Glossary of Archi- tecture, the exact date of a parish church is perpetuated by an inscrip- tion. On a stone over the south door of the chancel of Castor Church, in Northamptonshire, is the inscription, XV. KL. MAI. DEDICATIO. HUI. ECCLE — a.d. mcxxiii, and the character of the building entirely coincides with the date. 4 In a visit to twenty-two adjoining churches in the Deanery of Doncaster, in which I was accompanied by J. W. Hugall, Esq., Architect, whose society has doubled the pleasure of many an ecclesiological journey, we found that out of the twenty-two, fourteen had Norman remains ; and of four others of Norman foundation, there were sufficient historic notices. 126 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. But we must relieve this barren catalogue with one or two examples into which a little historic interest may be thrown. The Cathedral of Durham, and the Abbey church of Bolton in Yorkshire, now in ruins, offer themselves as happily falling in with our purpose. As in almost every case some account of the patron saint, where he has had a local importance in the neighbourhood, is a necessary part of the history of the church. S. Cuthbert was for some time Prior in the monastery of Lindisfarne, or Holy Island, but seeking in a deeper retirement the higher, or at least the more ascetical discipline of an anchorite, he fixed on the Island of Fame, some miles to the south of Holy Island, as the place of his retreat. The more inhospitable the barren rock, the better was it suited to his purpose, and Farne fully answered all that the hermit could desire in its unpromising aspect. No one had yet dared to disturb the evil spirits, which seemed to have made it their home, and which filled it with shapes and sounds of terror. The cell and oratory which he erected there, have been already described, (p. 36,) and in such solitude, and in such hardness, he wore out nine years of his life. His reputation, however, was not buried in the hermitage which he had chosen. In his absence, he was elected, by the council of Alne, to the see of Hexham ; but exchanging with Eata Bishop of York, he was consecrated to the latter see on Easter day, 685. His heart was still in the place of his greatest conflicts with the enemy of his soul, and he retired to die at Fame. There he requested that his body should be buried in a coffin of stone which had been given him by the Abbot Cudda ; directing however, that if the Pagans should attack the island, the brethren should carry his bones with them in their flight. The monks of Lindisfarne were not willing to lose his body, and at length at their earnest re- quest, he consented that it should be buried in their church, where it was enshrined, (a.d. 687,) at the right side of the high altar. Nine years after his death, the brethren, desiring to do honour to his remains, would have inclosed them in a small coffer placed above the floor. 1 Instead of dust and dried bones, 1 Transactis sepulturse ejus annis ut tollerent ossa illius, quae, more mor- undecim, iramisit in anirao fratrum, tuorum consumpto jam et in pulverem THE NORMAN PERIOD. 127 without flesh, for which they looked, they found his body still entire, his joints flexible, and even his clothes undecayed. They did not however desist from their purpose, but folding the body in a new robe, they placed it in a light chest, and laid it on the floor of the sanctuary. 1 One word in this description of the contemporary Bede seems to have been overlooked, alike by those who relate, and those who would account for a miracle. Sir Walter Scott gives the following metrical version of the future history of S. Cuthbert's body. " Nor did Saint Cuthbert's daughters fail, To vie with these in holy tale ; His body's resting-place, of old, How oft their patron changed, they told ; How, when the rude Dane burned their pile, The monks fled forth from Holy Isle ; O'er northern mountain, marsh, and moor, From sea to sea, from shore to shore, Seven years Saint Cuthbert's corpse they bore, They rested them in fair Melrose ; But though, alive, he loved it well, Not there his reliques might repose ; For, wondrous tale to tell ! In his stone coffin forth he rides, (A ponderous bark for river tides,) Yet light as gossamer it glides, Downward to Tillmouth cell. Nor long was his abiding there, For southward did the Saint repair; Chester-le-Street, and Rippon, saw His holy corpse, ere Wardilaw Hailed him with joy and fear ; And, after many wanderings past, He chose his lordly seat at last, Where his cathedral, huge and vast, Looks down upon the Wear : redacto corpore reliquo, sicca inveni- enda rebantur, atque in levi area re- condita, in eodem quidem loco, sed supra pavimentum, dignse venerationis gratia locarent.'' — Bede, Vita S. Cuth- berti, xlii. 1 " Et involutum novo amictu corpus levique in theca reconditum, super pa- vimentum sanctuarii composuerunt." —Ib. xlii. 128 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. There, deep in Durham's Gothic shade, His reliques are in secret laid ; But none may know the place, Save of his holiest servants three, Deep sworn to solemn secrecy, "Who share that wondrous grace." 1 In a note to this passage, where the same tale is told in prose, the poet accounts for the floating of the stone coffin on hydro- static principles. " He at length made a halt at Norham ; from thence he went to Melrose, where he remained stationary for a short time, and then caused himself to be launched upon the Tweed in a stone coffin, which landed him at Tillmouth, in Northumberland. This boat is finely shaped, ten feet long, three feet and a half in diameter, and only four inches thick ; so that with very little assistance, it might certainly have swum. It still lies, or at least did so a few years ago, in two pieces, beside the ruined chapel of Tillmouth." All this would have been unnecessary, had the levis theca in which his body was deposited nine years after his death been remembered. Little need be added to Sir Walter Scott's ac- count ; it is sufficient that Lindisfarne grew rapidly in wealth and importance, while S. Cuthbert rested there ; a circumstance which perhaps attracted the Danes to that retreat of the breth- ren, and occasioned their flight in 893. The episcopal see con- tinued to be fixed at Chester-le-Street, for one hundred and thirteen years ; but the Danes again invaded the repose of the sacred relics, and they found at last an asylum at Durham, a place, says Simeon, fortified by nature, but not easily made habitable, for it was covered with a thick wood, and presented at the top of a rock but a scanty patch of land which would repay the toil of cultivation. Here, however, the monks erected an arbour of boughs 2 for the body, and thence carried it to Whitkyrk, where it remained three years, while Aldwinus the Bishop was erecting a stone church for its repose ; which he finished, with the exception of the west tower, which was left to the pious care of Edmund his successor. 1 Marmion, ii. 14. Wear, and within the present city of 2 The church of S. Mary-le-Bow, or Durham, is said to be built on the spot le Bough, close upon the bank of the occupied by this arbour of boughs. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 129 Once again, however, the relics of the saint were driven from their home. William the Conqueror approaching York with an army, so frightened the monks of Durham, that they fled with their precious burden once more to Lindisfarne. But the panic was soon past, and Durham received a Bishop from the King, together with the restoration of many of the possessions of the Church, which he had unjustly seized. We are now arriving at the history of the present Cathedral, the three first stones of which were laid August 11, 1093, by Malcolm, King of Scotland, William de Sancto Carilepho the Bishop, and Turgot the Prior of Durham. The name, of Cari- leph is of so great importance in the history of his cathedral, that we shall give the substance of his career as an ecclesiastical architect, from the continuator of Turgot, published in Vol. II. of Wharton's Anglia Sacra. William de S. Carilepho, who was consecrated in 1081, was the founder of the present church. His benefactions are thus enumerated. He conferred very signal benefits upon his see, in- creasing its rents, asserting its liberties, and founding its church. For the old church which Bishop Aldhune had built, ninety-eight years before, having been destroyed, he commenced another of far greater magnificence, of which he laid the foundation on the 11th of August, 1093, according to Turgot; on the 12th of August, 1094, according to the Durham Annals. 1 He died January 2, 1096. His attendants would have acknowledged his great benefactions by a sepulchre in the cathedral which he had erected, but he himself (humble in this at least,) 2 would not con- sent that the ancient custom of that Church should be broken on his behalf, which denied to any one a burial place where the body of the most holy Cuthbert lay : he chose rather to be buried in the chapter house, where all his successors were also buried until the year 1311. 1 Maxima tamen Sedi suae beneficia vel 1094, 12 Augusti juxta Annales vir magnanimus contulit, auctis fundis, Dunelmenses. Morte autem preerepto assertis libertatibus, et fundata ecclesia. ei opus incseptum absolvere non licuit, Diruta enim post 98 annos vetusta, laude ista Ranulpho successori relicta." quam Aldhunus episcopus construxe- Anglia Sacra, i. 704. rat, ecclesia, aliam longe magnificenti- 2 The historian does not make Cari- orem inchoavit, positis ejus fundamen- leph a pattern of meekness and self- tis 1093, 11 Augusti juxta Turgotum, renunciation. 130 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. The church not being finished at Carilepb/s death, the glory of its completion was left to his successor, Ralph Flambard, justiciary of England, a man splendidly notorious for violence and wrong ; but the Church was enriched, while the people were fleeced. He had already, as Camden asserts, restored the church of Twinham, of which he was dean, with great splendour. We cannot follow him through the vicissitudes of a bad life, but when he came to his see he applied himself in earnest and suc- cessfully to the work which Carileph had left incomplete, though he was forced to regulate his expenditure on the fabric, by the amount of oblations at the altar and the cemetery : for from this fund he finished the walls of the church to the very roof. It must be added, however, that his predecessor, who commenced the work, had made a rule that the Bishop should be charged with the erection of the church, at his proper costs ; but that the monks should erect their own offices, out of the collections of the church ; which rule was set aside during the three years and five months that the see was vacant after his death. For the monks, leaving the monastic building, urged on the con- struction of the church, which Ralph found erected as far as the nave. He added also dossels, palls, copes, chasubles, tunics, and dalmatics, to the ornaments of the church. He extended the narrow courts of the monks both in length and breadth. Although the town was strong by nature, he made it stronger and more imposing by a wall. He built a wall reaching from the chancel of the church to the castle keep. He threw open the space between the church and the castle, which was crowded with houses, that the church might be free from all unseemly accidents and from fire. He united the two banks of the Wear with a solid stone bridge of arches. He built a castle on the top of a rock which overhung the river Tweed, 1 that it might be a check upon the thieves and the Scots. 2 1 I.e., at Norham, a.d. 1121, as Hoveden says. 2 Circa opus ecclesise modo intentius modo reraissius agebatur ; sicut illi ex oblatione altaris et csemiterii vel sup- petebat pecunia vel deficiebat. His namque sumptibus navem ecclesise circumductis parietibus ad sui usque testudinem erexerat. Porro predeces- sor illius, qui opus inchoavit, id decer- nendo statuerat ; ut episcopus ex suo ecclesiam, monachi vero suas ex eccle- sise collectis facerent officinas. Quod illo cadente cecidit. Monachi enim THE NORMAN PERIOD. 131 In the year 1104 the Cathedral thus begun by Carileph, and carried on by the Monks during the vacancy of the see (the merit of which is doubtless to be ascribed to Prior Turgot,) and almost completed by Flambard, was sufficiently advanced to re- ceive the relics of S. Cuthbert. The 29th of August was fixed on for the ceremonial ; but with great reverence the relics were first of all inspected by the brethren, and afterwards exhibited to the people, that there might remain no doubt of the fact that S. Cuthbert's body was still uncorrupted. At night, there- fore, they met at the sepulchre, and taking off the stone found a chest, well guarded with nails and leather j 1 and in it another wrapped in a cloth thrice doubled, in which they found the book of the Evangelists, which according to an old legend had been recovered by the saint after it had fallen into the sea ; a little silver altar, a chalice of pure gold, an onyx stone, and an ivory comb. In a third chest was the body of S. Cuthbert, lying on the right side to give room for other reliques, among which were the bones of the Venerable Bede, and the head of S. Oswald. The rest of the reliques were deposited in other parts of the church, but the head of S. Oswald was placed between the hands of S. Cuthbert, 2 and, with his body enshrined behind the high altar; Bishop Flambard preaching to the people on the occasion. The end of Ralph Flambard was what the end of a violent and grasping man ought to be. A month before his death he was carried into the church, and there before the altar he made omissis officinarum aedificationibus operi ecclesiae insistunt ; quam usque navem Ranulphus jam aedificatam in- venit. Addidit etiara ornamentis ec- clesiae dorsalia, pallia, cappas, casulas, tunicas quoque et dalmaticas. Angus- tias curiae monachorum porrecto in longum et latum spatio dilatavit. Ur- bem hanc licet natura munierit, muro ipse reddidit fortiorem et augustiorem. A cancello ecclesiae ad arcem usque cas- telli producta murum construxit longi- tudine. Locum inter ecclesiam et castellum, quern multa occupaverant habitacula, in patentis campi redegit K planitiem ; ne vel ex sordibus contami- natio vel ex ignibus ecclesiam attinge- rent pericula. Diversas Wiri fluminis ripas continuavit structo de lapide magni operis ponte arcuato. Condidit castellum in excelso praeruptae rupis super Twedam flumen ; ut inde latro- num incursus inhiberet et Scotorum irruptiones. — Anglia Sacra, i. 708. 1 The same perhaps still remaining, and now or lately in the castle. 2 Hence S. Cuthbert is often repre- sented in mediaeval paintings, with S. Oswald's head in his hands. 2 132 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. a deep confession of penitence, and restored the rights of the church which he had usurped, and its possessions which he had alienated ; confirming this act of restitution by placing his ring- on the altar, and by a deed sealed with his seal. 1 He died in 1128 and the Bishopric was vacant for five years, all but a month, during which time the monks of Durham finished the nave of the church. 2 The cathedral may now be called perfect, for although it has to receive several additions, and many enrichments, it is already complete in all its essential parts, as a cathedral and monastic church. As its original features still remain there will be little difficulty in describing it as it then stood, which we will do in the present tense as if we were in the train of Flambard' s suc- cessor when he took possession of his throne, but without affecting any archaisms of language. As we approach the city, we see first rising out from among the trees the castle keep, and the three towers of the church ; and already we hear the bells pealing from the central tower, welcoming us to our new home. But there is yet some space to traverse, and with hearty thanks to Flambard for his bridge of stone we pass the Wear, and wind upwards towards the cathedral. This mighty pile stands on the brow of a precipice, beneath which to the west the river turns the abbey mill. On all other sides it is surrounded by the Priory and its several offices. The church itself has a nave and choir, both with side aisles ; but the transepts have aisles only to the east. The choir is much shorter than the nave, and the east end terminates in a semicir- cular apse. 3 We approach by the north and find the space before the church cleared of unseemly obstructions by Flambard, so that the whole extent of the cathedral opens upon us in all its mag- nificence. The length of the nave, transepts, and choir, with 1 Per annulum altari impositum tempore navis Ecclesise Dunelmensis omnia restituit Ecclesia? ablata ; car- Monachis operi instantibus peraeta taque sua et sigillo confirmavit resti- est. tuta. 3 This however is conjecture ; the 2 Vacavitque Episcopatus per quin- east end, whatever it was, having given quennium excepto uno mense. Eo place to the nine altars. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 133 their aisles, is relieved by the two western towers, which rise just above the roof, and by the greater mass, though the height is but little more, of the central tower, which gives variety and harmony to the whole ; and while the tower seems to be held aloft by the giant arms of the nave, choir, and transepts, they in their turn receive support from their aisles. It is some time before we obtain sufficient self-command to attend to the details of so vast a pile, but on a closer inspection we find these equal to the general design. Around all is carried, next the ground, a blank arcade of semicircular arches resting on clustered columns. Above these are the aisle windows, each of one round- headed light, with engaged shafts in the jambs, and a triforium of the same character, but the windows considerably smaller. The buttresses between the several bays of the aisle are plain and shallow, and die in the wall at the bottom of the triforium, instead of being carried, as is perhaps more usual, (and is the case here with the clerestory) into the corbel-table. The clere- story has also its round-headed lights with shafts in the jambs, and the whole terminates in a high-pitched roof, [most probably] of shingles, to be replaced with lead by some future benefactor. The transept is flanked with huge buttress-like projections, which rise into turrets above the roof, and like all the rest of the build- ing is pierced only with single-light round-headed windows : but the gable is enriched with an arcade of semicircular intersecting arches, above which it is finished with a kind of reticulated masonry, with which large surfaces of wall are often covered. The western towers and the great central tower are also decorated with arcades and pierced with round-headed lights; and they are capped with high-pitched roofs, like those of the body of the church covered with shingles, and surmounted by weathercocks. The Bishop entered at the west, by a path on the brow of the rock, winding close round the corner of the church, but the north door is worthy to receive its portion of the coming train. It occupies the last bay but one westward, and is of several orders of receding masonry, each richly decorated, beneath a high pediment, crowned with a cross. As we enter, the gran- deur of the nave is almost beyond expression. The piers are alternately cylindrical and clustered, the former enriched with reticulations or chevrons indented in their surface, and all of 134 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. great solidity. The bases are square and almost plain, the capi- tals of the heaviest form admissible into a building of any en- richment. The arches are semicircular., and enriched with the zigzag and billet mouldings. Each compartment of the triforium opens into the nave by two arches within a single larger arch ; and each clerestory compartment is of three arches, the central one much higher than the others. The roof is not yet vaulted, though it will doubtless soon receive this more perfect covering. The aisles were vaulted ; from the beginning and around their walls, below the windows, rims an arcade, of intersecting arches. And all this is repeated through a length of four hundred feet. But mere size is but a small part of the beauty of such a struc- ture, which consists at least equally in a happy combination of variety and uniformity, and these characters are here most happily blended. The uniform recurrence of the circular arch every- where with the general similarity of design through nave and choir, with the liberal use of the chevron moulding, that most effective of all decorations, ensures sufficient harmony and uni- formity ; while the variations in the sections of the piers, and the three arcades rising above one another, the first of single, the next of double, and the third of triple arches, afford abun- dant variety. Nor must the dim light admitted everywhere through small windows, filled with stained glass, — and the shrine of S. Cuth- bert resplendent with jewels, — and the light of many lamps, — and the high altar with its costly furniture, be forgotten : and then shall we confess that S. Cuthbert has found at last a worthy resting place on the heights of Durham. The monks indeed have thought something less of their own than of their patron's honour, they are yet without a chapter- house which our good lord and father has promised to build. But here we return to the language of history. During the episcopate of Godfrey, Flambard's successor, which extended to 1140, the chapter-house was finished. 1 At his death he gave many ornaments to the cathedral, but grievous storms broke 1 " The original and fine Norman chapter-house was wantonly destroyed by Mr. Wyatt and the officers of the Cathedral, in 1800, and a modern room built on its site. Mr. Carter remon- strated strongly against this destruc- tion, but in vain." — Companion to Glossary. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 135 over the church and kingdom at this juncture, 1 and although they did not affect the cathedral itself, yet as they afford examples of the kind of violence to which churches were in those days sometimes exposed, we must slightly allude to them. The kingdom was now agitated by the contending claims of Stephen and the empress Maud, and in the north especially, owing to the neighbourhood of Scotland, whose king, David, had espoused the cause of his niece, the scale visibly inclined against Stephen. While Godfrey was in his last illness, William Corny n, chan- cellor of the Scotch king, who had been in days past one of Godfrey's priests, being on a visit at Durham, caballed with some of the clergy, and with the guard of the castle, that they should deliver up the castle to him, on the death of the Bishop, carefully excluding the prior and the archdeacons from the secret. Godfrey died while William was gone to the Scotch king, to obtain, through his influence, the episcopate so soon to be vacant ; and the next night his body was disembowelled and covered with salt, because it could not otherwise be kept un- buried. Meanwhile the prior and the archdeacon who were not admitted to the councils of the usurper, were kept out of the castle, and the bishop's death was concealed for three weeks. 2 But the truth began to be whispered abroad, and they gave up the body as if just dead, and on the next Sunday William re- turned. It is too long and not sufficiently to the purpose to tell how he endeavoured in vain to procure his election to the bishopric. Meanwhile messengers, who had been sent to Rome with tidings of the violence and fraud of William, returned with orders that the chapter should proceed to the election of a pre- late, and that if they could not assemble in the cathedral, they should conclude the good work in some neighbouring place. William de S. Barba was finally elected, and after a composition with William Comyn enthroned in the cathedral (October 18th, 1 " Ipsius tempore Capitulum Mo- nachorum, quale hodie cernitur, in- choatum et consummatum est. Obiit Gaufridus Episcopus. Moriens vero ornamenta Ecclesise non mediocria contulit ; sed in ipsius obitu contigit Ecclesiam gravissimas tempestates in- currere." — Anglia Sacra, i. 709. 2 He died Die Rogationum secunda, sc. feria tertia : his death was kept se- cret usque sextam feriam. 136 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. 1144.) The nine years of William's episcopate were scarcely sufficient to repair the damage done by the violence of Comyn, who ravaged the possessions of the see, cut off its retainers, and converted churches into garrisons, at his pleasure. Hugh Pud- scy succeeded under better auspices, and emulating the care of his predecessors to adorn the cathedral, he set himself in earnest to the same task. He commenced therefore a new work at the east end of the church, bases and columns of marble were brought from beyond the sea ; many masters [master masons ?] were successively engaged in the work not without danger to themselves, for the Fates were opposed to the work, and as many beginnings were made as there were masters ; and so, great sums having been expended in workmen, the walls at length had reached a considerable height, when great cracks appeared, and showed that the work was not pleasing to God, and to His ser- vant S. Cuthbert. Leaving this work therefore, the Bishop be- gan another at the west, to which women might be admitted, so that those who were not allowed a bodily approach to the more secret portions 1 of the sacred places, might be consoled by see- ing them from a distance. 2 He suspended also, in the church, before the altar, three silver lanterns, with silver sconces, inter- mixed with glass, in which tapers might burn night and day, in honour of S. Cuthbert, and of the relics ; and he placed others around the altar, like a crown, upon a candelabrum, by which the church might be lighted on the greater festivals. He made also a shrine of gold and silver, unto which he transferred the bones of the Venerable Bede, which was put together with so 1 Women were not allowed to ap- proach the shrine of S. Cuthbert. There still remains, on the pavement of the church, a great cross, indicating the nearest approach which was al- lowed to them. 2 »< Novum ergo ad Orientalem hu- jus ecclesise plagam opus construere ccepit. A transmarinis partibus defe- rebantur columnse et bases marmorese. Cumque plures non sine ipsorum peri- culo fatis intercedentibus admitteren- tur magistri, et tot haberet principia quot magistros ; sumptibus copiosis in operarios impensis, et muris in aliquam vixaltitudinemerectis, in rimas tandem deficiens, manifestum dabat indicium id Deo et famulo suo S. Cuthberto non fuisse acceptum. Omisso itaque opere illo, aliud ad Occidentem inchoavit ; in quo muliebris licite fieret introitus ; ut qui non habebant ad secretiora sanctorum locorum corporalem acces- sum, aliquod haberent ex eorum con- templatione solatium " — Anglia Sacra, i. 722. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 137 great skill that it was a doubt whether it was most remarkable for its workmanship, or for its splendour. Nor was he less worthy to be celebrated for the ornaments of gold and silver, 1 the cross and the chalice which he gave, ever bearing in mind the words of the psalm, Doinine, dilexi decorem domus tuse. Few foundations of this, or of any age are associated with more interesting circumstances, than that of Bolton ; and the great beauty of the remains, wedded as they are to exquisite scenery, will justify a little longer description of them. Bolton Abbey stands on the right bank of the river Wharf, at a spot where the character of Wharfclale has nearly completed a rapid, but abrupt transition, from the narrowness of a mountain torrent's rocky bed, to the open and scarcely less picturesque ver- dure of a broad valley, bounded by distant hills. The founders of monastic institutions have been applauded for the beauty and convenience of the sites which they chose for their conven- tual buildings ; which generally repose within some narrow vale, intersected by a stream considerable enough to turn the abbey mill, and to supply the refectory with fish : but if tradi- tion may be trusted, (and as it has in this instance some internal evidence, and great probability on its side, there can be no rea- son why it should not,) the rapid Wharf and its broken bed, gave another and a deeper reason for the choice of the site of Bolton Abbey, than the beauty of the scene, and the abundance of the fish in the river that washes its eastern boundary. The tradition is as follows ; — In the year 1121, William de Meschines and Cecilia his wife, founded at Embsay, about four miles from Bolton, a priory for 1 " Fecit etiam in Ecclesise coram altari tria ex argento bactilia cum initiis suis argenteis cristallis mixtim insertis dependi, in quibus lumina die noctuque perpetuo ardentia ob vene- rationem sancti patris Cuthberti et reliquiarum lucerent ; alia quoque in circuitu altaris ad instar corona? super candelabrum poni, quae majoribus so- leniis accensa Ecclesiam suis fulgoribus irradiarent. Feretrumque ex auro et argento, in quod ossa Venerabilis Bedse Presbyteri et Doctoris transferre decrevit, ex studio artificum tanta dili- gentia compositum, ut quid magis in eo prsestet, opus an decor, merito ve- niat in dubium. In ornamentis vero, cruce sc. et calice pariter ex auro, et aliis quee alibi scripta babentur, fa- mam melius exornavit ; id semper in corde recogitans canticum, Domine dilexi decorem domus ince." — Anglia Sacra, i. 723. 138 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Canons regular. The founders of Embsay left an only daugh- ter, Auliza, who adopted her mother's name, Romille, and was married to William Fitz-Duncan, a chief notorious for the ravages which he had committed on the property of the Church, in a foray which he headed at the command of David King of Scotland. The lady Romille and this William Fitz-Duncan had two sons ; the younger of whom, called the Boy of Egremont, from one of his grandfathers baronies, survived his father and his elder brother, and became the only hope of his widowed mother. A little above Bolton Abbey, the wharf, which is there no in- considerable stream, forces itself with irresistible impetuosity between two rocks, not more than four feet asunder. The tre- mendous roar of the contracted current, and the inevitable destruction of any living being that should fall into it, does not prevent some persons from leaping from rock to rock ; and it is more than probable that it may, in days long past, have been an ordinary place of passing the river. To this place (called the Strid, or Stride, from the facility with which it may be thus passed,) came the Boy of Egremont, leading a greyhound in a leash, and accompanied by a single forester. He sprang over the chasm, but the hound hanging back, and checking him in his leap, dragged him into the torrent. The forester hastened to his lady, and with despair in his features, exclaimed, " What is good for a bootless bene." 1 Reading in the words and demeanour of her son's attendant, the sadness of the tale that he had to tell, she replied: "Endless sorrow." But great as her first grief was, the resignation of the Christian overcame the despair of the desolate mother ; and with a religious feeling characteristic of those times she pro- vided for the translation of Embsay Priory to the banks of the river in which her son perished : and Bolton Abbey was accord- ingly built as near to the fatal spot as a convenient situation could be found. 2 The translation of the Priory of Embsay to 1 That is, 2 This tradition is consecrated by " Whence can comfort spring time and enshrined in the stanzas of Where prayer is of no avail ?" — Wordsworth, beginning, What is good Wordsworth. for a bootless bene ? THE NORMAN PERIOD. 139 Bolton took place a little more than thirty years after its first foundation, and about the middle of the twelfth century. To this date may perhaps be referred some parts of the remaining structure, though by far the larger portions belong to later periods. The nave is Early English, (i.e., of the thirteenth cen- tury,) the choir, or at least the greater part of it, (for parts of the choir are the oldest remains of all,) is in the Decorated style, and must therefore be referred to the fourteenth century : and at the dissolution of greater monasteries, among which fell Bolton, Richard Moon, the last Prior, had left uncompleted a tower at the west end, which would have been a noble specimen of the Perpendicular style. The exact date of this tower is determined by the inscription which it still bears, recording that Prior Moon laid the foundation in 1520 : but the occasion of its commence- ment has probably no record, but the general character of the whole building as it now stands. The remains of the central piers at the intersection of the nave and transepts, seem to in- dicate that there was before a central tower. This tower had probably given way before Prior Moon's time ; and the piers not being strong enough to admit of its restoration, recourse was had to the erection of a western tower. 1 The tower in the north transept of Fountains Abbey has probably a parallel history ; but there can be no doubt that the Abbot of Fountains selected the position of the new tower with far greater felicity than the Prior of Bolton. 1 If this conjecture is true, and none other appears to be equally probable, there is a trifling and accidental ana- chronism in the opening of The White Doe of Rylstone, the scene of which is laid by the poet partly in this neigh- bourhood, and the date, " In great Eliza's golden time." The first Canto opens thus — " From Bolton's old monastic tower, The bells ring loud with gladsome power.'' And again — « _ Full fifty years That sumptuous pile, with all its piers, Too harshly hath been doomed to taste The bitterness of wrongs or waste : The courts are ravaged ; but the tower Is standing with a voice of power, That ancient voice which wont to call To mass, or some high festival.'' Now if the central tower had fallen before the dissolution, it is certain that there was no tower standing " In great Eliza's golden time,'' nor any bells suspended for use. — Whitaker, indeed, argues that the tower was standing, because the bells are mentioned in the inventory of the sequestrators, among the effects of Bolton Priory : but bells unsuspended, (which these would be if the tower had fallen or given way,) would be included in such an inventory. 140 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. The Priory in its perfect state consisted, of course, of the Church, with the usual appendages of chapter-house, clois- ters, refectory, dormitories, and kitchens, with the Prior's resi- dence, all to the south of the church ; and the outer gateway and the Priory mill, at convenient distances. Of these, the church only remains, partially in ruins ; except the lodge, which is converted into an occasional residence of the Dukes of Devon- shire, the proprietors of this lordly domain. Of the church, the choir and transepts are in ruins, leaving, however, enough to prove that they are the remains, if not of one of the largest and most splendid, yet of one of the most elegant churches in the kingdom. The great east window must have been exceedingly grand, and the tracery, yet remaining, of some of the side windows is exquisite. The nave having been appro- priated to the chapelry of Bolton, in the parish of Skipton, at the dissolution, is still used for Divine service, and is kept in neat and sufficient repair. The present entrance is at the west, through the great door of Prior Moon's tower, which forms a singular and not unpleasing ante-church. Touching the walls of the original western front, without being built into them, or at all disturbing them, the tower arch forms to the eye a most remarkable frame-work for the beautiful lancet windows still re- maining entire. The casualties to which the structure is subject form interest- ing parts of the history of architecture, especially where they are to be traced to the character of the age, or to any defect in the structure, which may indicate an imperfect development of the art. To the fall of the central towers of Winchester and Ely, and of the western tower of Worcester, we have already alluded ; and though these events belong to a more recent period, yet so far as they were occasioned by an imperfection of structure re- ferable to the imperfect skill and lack of experience of the first Norman architects, they ought to be mentioned at least in this part of the history. There were doubtless many other towers of early date which shared the same fate, between the twelfth and the fifteenth century, among which we may notice those of Fountains and Bolton : but still we must needs say, that of the great number of towers erected about this time, a very large proportion have resisted the varied shocks of six hundred years. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 141 The great enemy of churches at that day was fire, which was of more frequent occurrence than it has been of late, and also from the constant recurrence of timber roofs, more destructive : for instance York, and also Weremouth were partially destroyed by fire in 1068. Durham was burnt in 1080. In 1113 Wor- cester was destroyed by fire, as Wulstan is said to have foretold on the day of its consecration; 1 and in 1114 Chichester was also burnt. In 1137 York, a cathedral most unhappy in this respect, was again a prey to the flames ; and in the same year the Abbey of Bath shared a like fate. In all these cases the church rose, phoenix-like with renewed vigour and beauty from its ashes ; and perhaps the most splendid of all our monastic remains, owe not a little of their beauty to the sacrilegious hands which set fire to an earlier church. The author of the life of " S. William Archbishop of York," gives the following pictu- resque account of the tumult, in which the enemies of the Arch- bishop destroyed the Abbey of Fountains in which he had taken refuge. " They attacked the Abbey of Fountains in a large body, with drawn swords, which they hoped to bedew in the blood of the holy Abbot. Their rage had so passed all control, that they feared not to profane the sacred Abbey itself : with impious and sacrilegious hands they tore down the gates, and entered the very sanctuary : but when he, for whose blood they thirsted, was not to be found, they rushed through the adjacent buildings and offices, laying every thing waste, and carrying off whatever was valua- ble ; and to finish their work of impiety, they set fire to the building, erected at so much labour and expense, and soon reduced it to a mass of ashes. At a short distance off stood the holy brotherhood, and beheld in dismay and anguish their house and church crumbling and sinking into ashes before the devouring flames. One little oratory, with its adjacent offices, remained to them not quite consumed, like a brand snatched from the fire. Here at the foot of the altar lay prostrate the Abbot, pouring forth in prayer his soul to God. His prayers were heard, for here, while the hand of the destroyer was at work, he lay unseen, unhurt, 'safe under the defence of the Most High, and abiding under the shadow of the Almighty.' The destroyers supposing that he was not at Fountains, at length departed, 1 laden,' as the monkish writer says, ' not with much money, but with much damnation.' They lived not long to rejoice in their impious deed : they were struck with the hand of God, and were cut off almost immediately in their sins, some of them dying of consumption, 1 Worcester was again burnt in 1202. 142 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. some by drowning, and some were struck with madness ; all of them in a short time perished in various ways, and almost all unreconciled to God ! Meanwhile the abbot and monks, taking courage and comfort from above, set themselves vigorously to work to rebuild the abbey and monastery ; and as it is written, ' the bricks are fallen down, but we will build with hewn stones,' so it was with the Abbey of Fountains : holy and faithful men of the neighbourhood gave their assistance, and in a short time the new fabric rose more beautiful and glorious than the former." In writing the history of an art in which we are so immea- surably surpassed by our remote ancestors as we are in Ecclesi- astical Architecture, and which, too, is so greatly elevated by its high office as a handmaid of the Church, there is no little dan- ger of seeming unthankful for our own happier lot in many things, and especially for our own less corrupted faith and purer institutions. And, indeed, it would be but palpable weakness to dissemble the conviction, that some quality there must be rather moral or religious, than either physical or purely intellectual, in which the churchmen of the middle ages exceeded ourselves ; and which enabled them to excel us in the application of the noblest of arts, to the highest of purposes. It is on this account the more necessary to bear in mind the many and most impor- tant respects in which we are greatly superior to them. I do not speak of doctrine, because as an Anglican churchman, writ- ing for Anglican churchmen, I cannot suppose a question on that point ; and also because the subject does not at all fall in with the purpose of this volume : but the violence and blood- shed, and the imperfect social system, which converted churches into sanctuaries, and then failed to respect the religion of the place : the outbreaks of the people, never wanting leaders in their attacks against the privileges, and even against the sacred edifices of the Church, and the retreats of her consecrated sons, into which they carried fire and sword without compunction : the bitter feuds between different degrees and orders of the de- voted servants of the sanctuary, which sometimes subverted churches, and sometimes monasteries, and filled the court of the Lord's house with satire and grossness, visible signs of anger and rivalry ; — these things are within our province and teach us a lesson of thankfulness that God has cast our lot in a land fairer, and in places pleasanter and more holy, than they would THE NORMAN PERIOD. 143 have been when blood and violence and rampant injustice, and unbridled rage and malice, cried so loud, even from the sacred precincts of the Lord's house, for the chastising rod. Viewed in this light there is a moral necessity for intermin- gling with the records of noble acts of devotion, and the praises of a higher art than now stoops to this lower sphere, such in- stances of destructive sacrilege as that just related. Others will occur to the reader, such as for instance the murder of Thomas a Beeket before the altar of S.Benedict in his own church; which has besides an importance in this history as the origin of a part of that Cathedral which has no fellow elsewhere, and is called from the prelate who thus fell, Becket's chapel, and Becket's crown. 1 One or two like instances I shall collect from the pages of a contemporary chronicler, now open before me, and with these I shall close for the present the less pleasant task of retouching the darker shades of our country's history. " On that day," viz. October 22, 1189, says Richard of Devizes, 5 * " Hugh de Nonante, Bishop of Coventry, laid his complaint before the Archbishop and Bishops assembled at the consecration of the Bishops elect, against his monks of Coventry, for having laid violent hands on him and drawn his blood before the altar. He had also expelled the greater part of the congregation before his complaint, nor did he cease from his importunity, until he had obtained the sanction of all the bishops in attestation to the Pope against the monks." 3 Coventry seems to be a place of many such troubles, for in the following year — " William, legate of the Apostolic see, held a council at Westminster, in which he sentenced all religion [all the religious ?] to be expelled from Coventry cathedral, and prebendary clerks to be substituted in place of 1 The martyrdom of Thomas a Becket has another connexion with this work, as affording a subject to many illuminations, frescoes, and painted windows. It may also be ob- served that in dedications of churches in England, S. Thomas is usually S. Thomas of Canterbury, and not S. Thomas the Apostle. 2 I have used Gale's translation. 3 It does not much alter the merits of the case as bearing on the charac- ter of the times, that the monks were resisting an armed force, which the Bishop had brought to expel them from their monastery. — See Godwin de Preesulibus. 144 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. the monks." And in 1192, " the Bishop of Chester, who, from his detes- tation of religion, had expelled the monks from Coventry, entirely broke down all the workshops there were in the monastery, that by the altered appearance of the place, all remembrance of its past state might be taken away from posterity. And further, lest the ruins of the walls should some day bespeak their author, the church of the place, which had not been finished, was found a ready plea, and having bestowed the materials upon it, without charge, he began to build. Moreover, he appointed the masons and plaisterers their hire out of the chattels of the monastery. They built eagerly, even the absent canons, around the church spacious and lofty villas perhaps for their own use, if even once in their lives any chance should offer a cause for visiting the place. None of the prebendaries regularly resided there any more than they do elsewhere ; but doing great things for the gates of the palaces, they have left to poor vicars induced by a trifling re- muneration to insult God, to them have they intrusted the holy chant and vanquished household gods and bare church walls. " This forsooth is true religion ; this is that glorious religion of the clerks, for the sake of which the Bishop of Chester, the first of men that durst commit so great iniquity, expelled his monks from Coventry." We would willingly curtail the account, but there is a raciness about the language of the monk of Devizes, even yet vocal to the wise, which forbids much alteration ; and besides the very bitterness of the man is a part of the evil we are exposing ; and whether Richard of Devizes is a slanderer, or Hugh of Chester a coarse sacrilegious tyrant, it is but a part of the overwhelming hostility between the secular and the regular clergy. " O what a fat morsel, and not to be absorbed, is a monk ! Many a thousand has that bit choked, while the wicked at their death have had it for their viaticum. If as often as a monk were calumniated and reproached he were consumed, all religion would be absorbed before many ages. At all times and in every place, whether the Bishop spoke in earnest or in jest, a monk was some part of his discourse. But as he could not desist from speaking of them, lest he should incur the opprobrium of a detractor, if in their absence he should carp at their order, he resolved to keep some monk abiding with him in his court, that his conversation about them might be made less offensive, by the presence and audience of one of them. So he took as his quasi chaplain, a certain monk, scarcely of age, but yet who had professed at Burton, whom to the scandal of religion, he gene- rally took about with him. O excess of sorrow ! Even among the angels of God is found iniquity. The monk, wise and prudent, seduced to the delusion, hardened his forehead as a harlot, that he a monk should not blush when monks were reviled. On a certain day, as the Bishop was THE NORMAN PERIOD. 145 standing over his workmen at Coventry, his monk attending close by his side, on whom the Bishop familiarly resting, said, ' Is it not proper and expedient, my monk, even in your judgment, that the great beauty of so fair a church, that such a comely edifice, should rather be appropriated to gods than devils ?' And while the monk was hesitating at the obscurity of the words, he added, ' 1/ said he, ' call my clerks gods, and monks devils !' And presently, putting forth the forefinger of his right hand to- wards his clerks, who were standing round him, continued, ' I say ye are gods, and ye are all the children of the Highest!' And having turned again to the left, concluded to the monk, ' But ye monks shall die like devils ; and as one and the greatest of your princes ye shall fall away into hell, because ye are devils upon earth. Truly, if it should befal me to officiate for a dead monk, which I should be very unwilling to do, I would commend his body and soul not to God, but to the devil !' The monk, who was standing in the very place that the monks had been plundered of, did not refute the insult on the monks, and because on such an occasion he was silent, met, as he deserved, with the reward of eternal silence being imposed upon him. For suddenly a stone falling from the steeple of the church, dashed out the brains of the monk who was attending on the Bishop, the Bishop being preserved in safety for some greater judgment." 1 Let us now take a general survey of the ecclesiastical architec- ture of the Norman period. It is probable that before the close of the twelfth century- there was scarcely a district, except, of course, the very thickly populated manufacturing towns, which happen to be placed almost universally in places least inhabited in those days, which had not as many churches as it has now ; and it is certain that in many parts of the country, especially in the neighbourhood of monastic or cathedral establishments, the churches were more numerous than they are at present. The greater part of the monasteries, too, which grew to future importance, were already founded, and the vast monastic pile, rising over the wooded banks of some murmuring stream, was a sight which whispered often of retirement from the world to the gay and proud, and to the poor and needy offered alms and a blessing. If there were darker shadows in the picture, morally and religiously speaking, they had no expression, nothing to suggest them, in the general outline and character of the church and the cloister. 1 Hugh de Nonante, however, did The year after his death the seculars not meet with a worse fate than the were driven out of Coventry, and the unhappy monk in the text. He died a monks reinstated. See Godwin de penitent, and in the habit of a monk ! Prcesulibus. L 146 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Descending to particulars, there was of course considerable variety in the character of different churches, according to their destination and importance. The smaller parish church usually consisted of a nave and chancel, with a tower, or frequently a bell-gable only at the west end. Sometimes, however, (indeed not unfrequently, if we may judge of the number which still retain this arrangement,) a third compartment was added to the east of the chancel, which became the sacrarium, and which was frequently apsidal in its termination j 1 and in this case the tower was sometimes, as at Stewkley, over the central compart- ment, or that between the nave and the sacrarium. Aisles were certainly not so common as in any future style, except in larger churches, although they were by no means necessarily excluded. In all cases a great part of the general exterior effect was due to the high-pitched roof which formed a very large proportion of the whole mass. The door was often placed in a projection of the wall, with a pedimental top, to give depth for jambs and arches of several successively receding orders ; and even where the thickness of the wall was not thus increased, there were almost invariably two orders of mouldings, each supported by its square jamb, with a shaft between them. The doorways of churches of this style, of all degrees of splendour and importance, are extremely rich, as compared with the rest of the exterior. 2 This is not an isolated particular. It is to be referred to a general principle, that of presenting the decorated face of every portion of the church to the advancing spectator. In their application of this principle the Normans were at least so far eminent, that the negative of the principle was most fully carried out by them, the other face of each portion of the church being often abso- lutely devoid of ornament, even when the former is very rich. 1 This form is so characteristic of the style, that I shall mention some examples. Steetley, Derbyshire, a ruined but very beautiful specimen ; Birkin, Yorkshire ; Kilpeck, Hereford- shire ; Stewkley, Buckinghamshire ; Dunwich, Suffolk ; and, on the au- thority of a drawing from a set of ec- clesiological notices made in 1592, given in Ormerod's Cheshire, iii. 331, the ancient chapel of Prestbury, in Cheshire. 2 Church builders in all the succeed- ing styles have borne testimony to the beauty of Norman doors, by frequently preserving them when all other parts of the church were rebuilt. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 147 The Norman architect never seemed to contemplate the possi- bility of a worshipper turning back. Entering at the rich door, which presents a glorious assemblage of decorations to the advancing eye, we leave behind us, as we pass the threshold, a perfect blank. We look to the chancel-arch, and, even in verjt small churches, find three or four concentric orders, with their jambs and jamb-shafts, each crowded with rich and effective de- corations ; and beyond this is the apse with its three windows, each surmounted with a glory of zigzag mouldings, and sepa- rated by vaulting-shafts, from which moulded groining-ribs arise to one point over the place of the altar, like a rich imperial crown ; and at the south of the chancel is the little side door, 1 through which the worshipper passes out, without having dis- covered that if he had turned his head at any stage of his ad- vance he would have seen but bare walls, and unadorned arches. All this may or may not have been designed to express such a meaning, but it surely looks like an embodying of the words of our Lord, " He that putteth his hand to the plough, and looketh back, is not worthy of Me." In conventual and cathedral churches this principle is not so fully carried out in the interior, and that because it does not so fully apply. They are for a society of clerics, who are never sup- posed to approach the offices of the church, but to be always in them, totus in illis, to be conversant in them, and, whichever way they turn, still about the work of the sanctuary. According to this notion the east end, when all the furniture is there, is indeed the richest, because it is the place of the highest mysteries, but all around is not plain except by comparison. Yet on the exte- rior, which represents the aspect which the church presents to the world, the rule holds. There the west front, the face which one approaches from without, is by far the most gorgeous ; sur- passing the east in decoration, as much as the east surpasses the west end, in the interior. I have mentioned this principle here, not only because we first find it, but because we find it most 1 This is usually called the priest's pass out of the church after the celebra- door, but I am persuaded that it was tionof mass. I must confess, however, really intended not for the priest to that general authority is here against enter by, but for the worshippers to me. L 2 148 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. fully carried out, in the Norman style. It gradually gave way before a different character of ornament, as well as a different application of it, until, in the Perpendieular style it is scarcely recognized, though it still retains its hold in the elaborate finish ftf the west fronts of our larger churches. In the arrangement of their essential parts the larger conven- tual churches were more uniform than the parish churches of this age ; though their extent, and numerous component parts gave room for great variety in composition. In almost all there was a long nave, a transept, (or cross, as it was anciently called,) and a choir of scarcely half the length of the nave, 1 and but a little longer than the transepts : indeed sometimes, as at Kirk- stall, the choir extended but one bay beyond the transepts, and just served to form the head of the cross, lest that most appro- priate form of the temple of Christ The Crucified should be lost. 2 Of course, in the interior the ritual choir extended into the nave, so that it had no defect of length for the purposes of divine worship. To nave, transepts and chancel alike there were generally aisles ; to the nave almost always, to the transepts sometimes on the east side only, where the several bays became chapels, with separate altars each under its east window. The choir was sometimes without aisles, and sometimes it was actually sur- rounded by them, forming a passage called the processional, be- hind and round the apse, or other eastern end. The apsidal termination was perhaps comparatively even more frequent in large churches than in small ones ; indeed, taking the cathedrals of England of Norman date as our guide, we should say it was almost universal. The altar was placed in the chord of the circle of which the apse was composed, 3 and behind it, 1 This is the most essential differ- ence in the ground plans of churches of this and the succeeding styles. In the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth centuries, the choir was nearly as long as the nave. 2 Professor Willis (Canterbury, p. 67,) has given the number of bays which constituted the choir of all the great Norman conventual churches whose dates are ascertained, and whose plan is recoverable. 3 This fact is curiously ascertained in the church of Birkin, in Yorkshire, by a hagioscope from an additional Decorated aisle which commands the centre of the chord of the apse. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 149 raised considerably above the ground, and approached by steps from the processionary, was the Bishop's throne, in cathedral churches. That at Norwich still remains. Gervase describes the site of that at Canterbury. It was in the wall, in the cir- cuit behind the altar, and here the Archbishops used to sit on high festivals, during the solemnizing of the mass, until the consecration, and then they descended by eight steps to the altar of Christ : this throne also, like that at Norwich, was pro- bably approached from the processionary : until within a few years it occupied its original position ; it is now removed into the corona. The ground plan of large churches had also several chapels within the shelter, so to speak, of the choir and transepts ; and these, as well as the choir had also, in general, apsidal termina- tions towards the east, 1 and the ends of the transepts sometimes have the same form in foreign churches of this age, but in England I believe never. The shortness of the choir, and its apsidal east end, with other subordinate apses are characteristics of this style, by which it is associated with the Saxon, and through that with the Basilican form of churches, so closely connected philosophically as well as in fact, with the earliest church architecture. The smaller churches, such as that of Steetley, most closely follow the Basili- can plan ; the cruciform arrangement of a monastic or cathedral church, combining with it the more distinctively Christian ar- rangements ; but there can be no doubt that the origin of the apse is to be sought in the Roman Basilica. It was discontinued sooner than we can find any satisfactory reason for its being laid aside. Its disadvantage is that it breaks up the east window, which is so magnificent a feature in later styles ; but the lancet of the Early English might well have been contented with the space allotted to it in a semi-octagon ; yet the apse had departed before the Early English was fully developed, nor does it appear, 1 In Professor Willis's conjectural plans, there are three apses in the Saxon Cathedral of Canterbury ; three in the church as it was rebuilt by Lan- franc, and nine in the enlarged church of Anselm. Messrs. Buckler give five apses to the church of S. Alban's, be- sides two which are apsidal in the in- terior, but not in the exterior outline. 150 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. except very rarely in later buildings. 1 The advantages of the apse might have pleaded for its retention even to the end, for nothing can exceed the grandeur which it gives to an exterior view, when it is supported by flying buttresses, springing from the surrounding processionary. The increased length of the choir is, on the other hand, a clear advantage of every succeeding arrangement, over that of the Normans, for it restores harmony between the structural and the liturgical division of the church, the choir being no, longer brought down into the nave in the interior arrangements. The great eastern crypt, extending sometimes beneath the whole of the choir, from the central tower to the extreme east, is another distinctive feature of Norman construction, which it borrowed from the preceding style, but which was not continued in succeeding centuries. These crypts were used as burial places of holy men, whence they were called confessionaries, and some became crowded with their shrines, and with altars, and chapels, and they became places of the most retired devotions of the faithful. 2 The crypts of Canterbury, Winchester, Gloucester, Rochester, and Worcester, were all founded before 1085, and after this they were discontinued, except as additions to those already existing, as at Canterbury and Rochester, the first espe- cially being of great magnificence, and in every respect worthy of careful study. The Early English crypt of the Lady Chapel at Hereford, is a single instance of later foundation; 3 and passing the borders we have the magnificent crypt, also Early English, of the Cathedral of Glasgow. Still crypts may be considered distinctively Saxon and Norman appendages of our great churches. 1 Like many early arrangements, it seems to have been partially revived in the latest style. It occurs for instance at S. Michael's, Coventry, and in Henry the Seventh's chapel, West- minster. 2 I cannot refrain from directing at- tention to the gross and unfounded abuse of Fosbroke's article on crypts, in the Encyclopaedia of Antiquities. Among the parts of churches, he enu- merates crypts, for clandestine drink- ing, feasting \ and tilings of that kind, (p. 125.) The man who could write thus is not of course very accessible to shame, but even he might blush to find that his own notices of the uses of crypts from old authorities prove that they were purely devo- tional. 3 Professor Willis' Canterbury, p. 71. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 151 We now proceed to the details of structure. Throughout the whole edifice, the aisle walls were usually pierced with one or two series of windows, and there was a clerestory over them : the ends of the transepts and of the choir had, in most cases, three ranges of windows : but the west end, for greater dignity of effect had generally but one set of taller windows over the lofty and gorgeous west door; and it was sometimes rendered still more imposing, by towers, terminating the aisles. Another tower rising from the intersection of the cross seemed borne aloft by the mighty arms stretched from the four quarters to sustain it, but it was only of sufficient elevation to break the long line of nave, choir, and transepts all of equal height. Throughout the exterior, large surfaces were broken by arcades of round-headed arches, resting on engaged shafts, and fre- quently intersecting. Sometimes, especially in the tower, some of these were pierced and formed windows. Among external decorations, which added not merely to the richness of the building on a close view, but to the general character also, must be added the corbel table, often of grotesque heads, or other rude forms, and from its depth and position of great con- sequence as a decorative feature : and the reticulated or imbri- cated forms cut on the face of large surfaces, as in the tower of Castor Church, and the north transept gable of Durham Cathedral. 1 The roofs externally were all of high pitch, those of the towers but little more so than the rest ; and they were covered gene- rally with tiles or shingles, but sometimes with lead. The nearest approaches to spires, in form if not in height, were found in the large pinnacles surmounting angle-buttresses in the larger churches. 2 In the interior, round arches were supported sometimes by cylindrical pillars, varying in height from two to seven diame- 1 This method of relieving a sur- face is one of the characters de- rived by the Normans from the use of brick. 2 As for instance, the splendid tur- rets with their conical caps at the east end of Peterborough. Connected with a small church these would in fact form spires, in the ordinary acceptation of the term, and no mean spires they would be. 152 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. ters, 1 (but almost universally more nearly approaching the former proportion,) sometimes by square piers, or masses of wall, with or without engaged shafts to relieve their flat surfaces. The bases were generally square, as were also the capitals ; the latter very plain or variously decorated, sometimes with grotesque figures of leaves, men and animals ; sometimes in imitation more or less exact of the Corinthian capital, which was received, however, by the Norman architect, through the western empire, and was never produced with a perfectly classical grace. The abacus was almost invariably square, and either without mould- ings, or without such mouldings as would break the effect of a straight line, presented by a succession through several com- partments of a building. In short the abacus represents the classical entablature, running unbroken along a whole building, and on this account is a very valuable link, in Romanesque, be- tween the classical forms of the Grecian orders, and the very dissimilar, but not less beautiful creations of mediaeval art. The roof of the nave and choir was either open to the main timbers, or ceiled with flat panels, level with the top of the walls, and painted in brilliant colours. 2 A large expanse, as that of the nave or choir, was seldom if ever vaulted ; even the crypts being divided into a greater number of aisles than the superincumbent edifice, to avoid a large span of roof : but the aisles are often vaulted. The geometrical construction of the vaulting where it did occur, was very simple ; the four sides of the compartments being equal, two semicylinders intersecting one another formed the simplest quadripartite vault. Where the sides of the compartment were unequal, one of the cylin- ders was usually stilted that the central point of intersection might coincide at the top of the vault ; but sometimes the con- struction was so inartificial, as to throw the groining ribs more or less apart. Into more elaborate geometrical arrangements I shall not here enter. The mechanical construction of vaults was often equally sim- ple, or rather rude. The groining ribs (and cross springers where there are any) alone are of wrought stone, and support 1 Rickman. But those in the crypt 2 That of Peterborough is usually of York are of much less than two di- considered original, ameters. THE NORMAN PERIOD. 153 the whole of the vault, which is of rough cement laid upon the centrings which were removed when it was set, and sometimes to this day retains the impressions of the boards. The practical imperfection of this construction often becomes apparent in the premature decay of the vault. " The roins of Lindisfarne, on the Northumberland coast, have long exhibited the great cross springer rib, over the intersection of the nave and transepts, re- maining, while the rest of the roof is destroyed." 1 The choir of Kirkstall presents much the same appearance, the in- terstitial vaulting falling rapidly to decay, while the groining ribs remain. It is no part of the plan of this work to enumerate or de- scribe all the decorations distinctive of each style : these may be found in any manual of ecclesiastical architecture. "Where, how- ever, there is a progressive development, or a character common to several forms, but more or less peculiar to a particular style, the class of decorations in which these are found, are a part not only of the details, but of the history of the art. The decorations of the Saxon era consisted almost exclusively of what may be called surface carving, as distinguished from mouldings. In this style surface carving still preponderates 2 though mouldings begin to appear; but they are themselves generally enriched with forms which break in upon the continu- ous projections and hollows which alone can strictly be called mouldings. When, however, the same forms are repeated along the same line, they are generally included under the term mouldings, and thus, two of the most beautiful and character- istic kinds are called the chevron or zigzag, and the beak-head moulding. The former is perhaps the most effective decoration in ecclesiastical architecture, and is especially beautiful over the interior of window arches where it receives and scatters the light with great effect. The medallion moulding consisting of series of subjects carved in relief upon round or oblong paterae is more complicated, though in general effect less beautiful : but it affords ample opportunity to display the fecundity of the 1 Rickman. 2 Though nothing can be farther removed from it in character and effect, the panelling and decoration of sur- faces in the late Perpendicular, as seen in excess in King's College Chapel, is a return to the principle of Norman surface sculpture. 154 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. mason's invention, and sometimes presents a curions series of carvings ; as for instance the twelve signs of the zodiac, several of the parables of the New Testament, and the like. All these are as we have said, strictly speaking, rather surface decorations of mouldings, than mouldings strictly so called, and we shall find them gradually disappearing in the succeeding style. — Where mouldings occur in this style they generally occupy the wall and the soffit plane, 1 or even one of these alone, and not the chamfer plane; and of course all the' profuse decorations which cover the face of the mouldings occupy the same position, which gives a squareness, (a directness, if we may so speak, to express character as well as mere form,) to the decorated sur- faces of the Normans. Whether or no it has any connection with the character of the people, the Norman is a most straight- forward style. And to this we have only to add that on the whole the effect of Norman decoration is due to the aggregation of a great number of forms, each in itself not possessing much beauty ; but it may admit a doubt whether any succeeding style produced an effect equal in solemnity and gorgeousness to the door-ways, and chancel-arches of the Norman period. 1 I.e., the plane of the wall, and that at right angles with it, and not at an angle of 45°. 155 CHAPTER VIII. The Transition from Norman to Early English. The Burning of Canterbury Cathedral. — The Restoration by Wil- liam of Sens and William the Englishman. — The older and newer fabrics compared. — introduction of the pointed arch and its results. influence of the patron saint on the fabric of the Church. " In the year of grace one thousand one hundred and seventy-four, by the just but occult judgment of God, the Church of Christ at Canterbury was consumed by fire, in the forty-fourth year from its dedication, that glorious choir, to wit, which had been so magnificently completed by the care and industry of Prior Conrad. " Now the manner of the burning and repair was as follows. In the aforesaid year, on the nones of September, at about the ninth hour, (Sep. 5, between three and four p.m.) and during an extraordinarily violent south wind, a fire broke out before the gate of the church, and outside the walls of the monastery, by which three cottages were half destroyed. From thence, while the citizens were assembling, and subduing the fire, cinders and sparks carried aloft by the high wind, were deposited upon the church, and being driven by the fury of the wind between the joints of the lead, remained there amongst the half-rotten planks, and shortly glowing with increasing heat, set fire to the rotten rafters ; from these the fire was communicated to the larger beams and their braces, no one yet perceiving or helping. For the well painted ceiling below, and the sheet-lead cover- ing above, concealed between them the fire that had arisen within. " Meantime the three cottages, whence the mischief had arisen, being destroyed, and the popular excitement having subsided, everybody went home again, while the neglected church was consuming with internal fire unknown to all. But beams and braces burning, the flames rose to the slopes of the roof ; and the sheets of lead yielded to the increasing heat and began to melt. Thus the raging wind, finding a freer entrance, in- creased the fury of the fire ; and the flames beginning to show themselves, a cry arose in the churchyard : 1 See ! see ! the church is on fire !' " Then the people and the monks assemble in haste, they draw water, they brandish their hatchets, they run up the stairs, full of eagerness to save the church, already, alas ! beyond their help. But when they reach the roof and perceive the black smoke and scorching flames that pervade it throughout, they abandon the attempt in despair, and thinking only of their own safety, make all haste to descend. 156 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. " And now that the fire had loosened the beams from the pegs that bound them together, the half-burnt timbers fell into the choir below upon the seats of the monks ; the seats, consisting of a great mass of wood-work, caught fire, and thus the mischief grew worse and worse. And it was mar- vellous, though sad, to behold how that glorious choir itself fed and assisted the fire that was destroying it. For the flames multiplied by this mass of timber, and extending upwards full fifteen cubits, scorched and burnt the walls, and more especially injured the columns of the church. " And now the people ran to the ornaments of the church, and began to tear down the pallia and curtains, some that they might save, but some to steal them. The reliquary chests were thrown down from the high beam and thus broken, and their contents scattered ; but the monks collected them and carefully preserved them from the fire. Some there were, who, inflamed with a wicked and diabolical cupidity, feared not to appropriate to themselves the things of the church, which they had saved from the fire. "In this manner the house of God, hitherto delightful as a paradise of pleasures, was now made a despicable heap of ashes, reduced to a dreary wilderness, and laid open to all the injuries of the weather. " The people were astonished that the Almighty should suffer such things, and maddened with excess of grief and perplexity, they tore their hair and beat the walls and pavement of the church with their heads and hands, blaspheming the Lord and His saints, the patrons of the church ; and many, both of laity and monks, would rather have laid down their lives than that the church should have so miserably perished. " For not only was the choir consumed in the fire, but also the infirmary, with the chapel of S. Mary, and several other offices in the court ; more- over many ornaments and goods of the church were reduced to ashes." 1 The pure Norman style found a tomb in the ashes of Canter- bury, over which Gervase so pathetically mourns ; for in the res- toration, to which we now proceed, still following the authority of Gervase, an eyewitness of all that passed, the pointed arch is frequently used, and several Early English decorations are intro- duced. 1 This account of the burning of the Cathedral of Canterbury is taken from Gervase, and from Professor Willis's translation of his history. Professor Willis observes that " the most re- markable mediaeval writer of architec- tural history is undoubtedly Gervase:" it is equally true to say that the most remarkable living writer on mediaeval architecture is undoubtedly the trans- lator of Gervase. The history of Can- terbury Cathedral is perfect. With a glorious subject ; with a contem- porary chronicle before him surpas- sing every other in existence for minute description ; with a full know- ledge both of structure and of ecclesi- ology to guide him in making the cathedral and the chronicle illustrate each other, Professor Willis has pro- duced a work which has done more to fix our knowledge on the subject of which he treats, than any other work in existence. THE TRANSITION FROM NORMAN TO EARLY ENGLISH. 157 The choir being destroyed, the Clergy of Canterbury put to- gether as well as they could an altar and station in the nave, where they might wail and howl, rather than sing the matins and nocturns : and taking the relics of SS. Dunstan and El- phege, the patron saints of the church from the ruins, they dis- posed them as decently as possible at the altar of the Holy Cross in the nave, and there, for five years the brethren remained in grief and sorrow, separated from the people only by a low wall. Meanwhile they consulted how the church might be repaired; but this was impossible, for the columns of the church, com- monly called the pillars, were scaling in pieces from the heat of the fire, and hardly able to stand. French and English artifi- cers were consulted, but they differed in opinion, some under- taking to repair the columns without mischief to the walls above : others asserting that the church must be pulled down, if the brethren would worship in safety. "However, amongst the other workmen there had come a certain William of Sens, a man active and ready, and as a workman most skilful both in wood and stone. Him therefore they retained, on account of his lively genius and good reputation, and dismissed the others. And to him, and to the providence of God was the execution of the work committed. " And he, residing many days with the monks and carefully surveying the burnt walls in their upper and lower parts, within and without, did yet for some time conceal what he found necessary to be done, lest the truth should kill them in their present state of pusillanimity. " But he went on preparing all things that were needful for the work, either of himself or by the agency of others. And when he found that the monks began to be somewhat comforted, he ventured to confess that the pillars rent with the fire and all that they supported must be destroyed if the monks wished to have a safe and excellent building. At length they agreed, being convinced by reason and wishing to have the work as good as he promised, and above all things to live in security ; thus they consented patiently, if not willingly, to the destruction of the choir. " And now he addressed himself to the procuring of stone from beyond sea. He constructed ingenious machines for loading and unloading ships, and for drawing cement and stones. He delivered moulds for shaping the stones to the sculptors who were assembled, and diligently prepared other things of the same kind. The choir thus condemned to destruction was pulled down, and nothing else was done in this year." Then follows in the chronicle of Gervase a history and de- scription of the former church, which with Professor Willis* 158 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. plan and notes of explanation are most graphic and instructive ; so that we are almost in as favourable a condition even with respect to the church of Lanfranc, which was destroyed long before Gervase's time, as the predecessors of the chronicler, who had not, as he complains, left behind them any very clear de- scription of the church in their day. The former history of the church, however, is not to our present purpose. " Leaving out therefore," we again turn to Gervase, and use his words, " all that is not absolutely necessary, let us boldly prepare for the destruction of this old work and the marvellous building of the new, and let us see what our master William has been doing in the meanwhile." The first year was taken up in destroying the old works, and making preparations for the new. In the following year (1175) before winter, William of Sens " had erected four pillars, that is, two on each side, and after the winter two more were placed, so that on each side were three in order, upon which and upon the exterior wall of the aisles he framed seemly arches and a vault, that is, three claves on each side. I put clavis for the whole cibo- rium, because the clavis placed in the middle locks up and binds together the parts which converge to it from every side. With these works the second year was occupied. " In the third year (a.d. 1176-7) he placed two pillars on each side, the two extreme ones of which he decorated with marble columns placed around them, and because at that place the choir and crosses were to meet, he constituted these principal pillars. To which, having added the key- stones and vault, he intermingled the lower triforium from the great tower to the aforesaid pillars, that is, as far as the cross, with many marble columns. Over which he adjusted another triforium of other materials, and also the upper windows. And in the next place, three claves of the great vault, from the tower, namely, as far as the crosses. All which things appeared to us and to all who saw them, incomparable and most worthy of praise. And at so glorious a beginning we rejoiced and con- ceived good hopes of the end, and provided for the acceleration of the work with diligence and spirit. Thus was the third year occupied and the beginning of the fourth. "In the summer of which, commencing from the cross, he erected ten pillars, that is, on each side five. Of which the two first were ornamented with marble columns to correspond with the other two principal ones. Upon these ten he placed the arches and vaults. And having, in the next place completed on both sides the triforia and upper windows, he was, at the beginning of the fifth year, in the act of preparing with machines for the turning of the great vault, when suddenly the beams broke under his THE TRANSITION FROM NORMAN TO EARLY ENGLISH. 159 feet, and he fell to the ground, stones and timbers accompanying his fall, from the height of the capitals of the upper vault, that is to say, of fifty feet. Thus sorely bruised by the blows from the beams and stones, he was rendered helpless alike to himself and for the work, but no other per- son than himself was in the least injured. Against the master only was this vengeance of God or spite of the devil directed. " The master, thus hurt, remained in his bed for some time under medi- cal care in expectation of recovering, but was deceived in this hope, for his health amended not. Nevertheless, as the winter approached, and it was necessary to finish the upper vault, he gave charge of the work to a certain ingenious and industrious monk, who was the overseer of the masons; an appointment whence much envy and malice arose, because it made this young man appear more skilful than richer and more powerful ones. But the master reclining in bed commanded all things that should be done in order. And thus was completed the ciborium between the four principal pillars. In the key-stone of this ciborium the choir and crosses seem as it were to meet. Two ciboria on each side were formed before the winter; when heavy rains beginning stopped the work. In these operations the fourth year was occupied and the beginning of the fifth. " And the master, perceiving that he derived no benefit from the physi- cians, gave up the work, and crossing the sea, returned to his home in France. And another succeeded him in the charge of his works ; William by name, English by nation, small in body, but in workmanship of many kinds acute, and honest. He, in the summer of the fifth year (a.d. 1179), finished the cross on each side, that is, the south and the north, and turned the ciborium, which is above the great altar, which the rains of the previous year had hindered, although all was prepared. Moreover, he laid the foundation for the enlargement of the church at the eastern part, because a chapel of S. Thomas was to be built there. " For this was the place assigned to him ; namely, the chapel of the Holy Trinity, where he celebrated his first mass, where he was wont to prostrate himself with tears and prayers, under whose crypt for so many years he was buried, where God for his merits had performed so many miracles, where poor and rich, kings and princes, had worshipped him, and whence the sound of his praises had gone forth into all lands. " The master William began, on account of these foundations, to dig in the cemetery of the monks, from whence he was compelled to disturb the bones of many holy monks. These were carefully collected and deposited in a large trench, in that corner which is between the chapel and the south side of the infirmary house. Having, therefore, formed a most sub- stantial foundation for the exterior wall with stone and cement, he erected the wall of the crypt as high as the bases of the windows. " Thus was the fifth year employed, and the beginning of the sixth. "In the beginning of the sixth year (a.d. 1180) from the fire, and at the time when the works were resumed, the monks were seized with a violent longing to prepare the choir, so that they might enter it at the 160 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. coming Easter. And the master, perceiving their desires, set himself man- fully to work, to satisfy the wishes of the convent. He constructed, with all diligence, the wall which encloses the choir and presbytery. He erected the three altars of the presbytery. He carefully prepared a resting-place for S. Dunstan and S. Elfege. A wooden wall to keep out the weather was set up transversely between the penultimate pillars at the eastern part, and had three glass windows in it." In fact the convent returned into the new choir, April 19, 1180, about the ninth hour of Easter Eve, but I must refer to Gervase, again, with Willis's notes, for the details of the interest- ing ceremonial, and the preparations for it. The works did not proceed with less zeal because the brethren had returned to the choir. In the same manner, " The outer wall round the Chapel of S. Thomas, begun before the win- ter, was elevated as far as the turning of the vault. But the master had begun a tower at the eastern part, outside the circuit of the wall as it were, the lower vault of which was completed before the winter. " The Chapel of the Holy Trinity above mentioned was then levelled to the ground; this had hitherto remained untouched out of reverence to S. Thomas, who was buried in the crypt. But the saints who reposed in the upper part of the chapel were translated elsewhere. " The translation of these Fathers having been thus effected, the chapel, together with its crypt, was destroyed to the very ground ; only that the translation of S. Thomas was reserved until the completion of his chapel. For it was fitting and manifest that such a translation should be most solemn and public. In the mean time, therefore, a wooden chapel, suffici- ently decent for the place and occasion, was prepared around and above his tomb. Outside of this a foundation was laid of stones and cement, upon which eight pillars of the new crypt, with their capitals, were com- pleted. The master also carefully opened an entrance from the old to the new crypt. And thus the sixth year was employed, and part of the seventh. " Now let us carefully examine what were the works of our mason in this seventh year (a.d. 1181) from the fire, which, in short, included the completion of the new and handsome crypt, and above the crypt the ex- terior walls of the aisles up to their marble capitals. The windows, how- ever, the master was neither willing nor able to turn, on account of the approaching rains. Neither did he erect the interior pillars. Thus was the seventh year finished, and the eighth begun. " In this eighth year (a.d. 1182) the master erected eight interior pillars, and turned the arches and the vault with the windows in the circuit. He also raised the tower up to the bases of the highest windows under the vault. In the ninth year (a.d. 1183) no work was done for want of funds. In the tenth year (a.d. 1184) the upper windows of the tower, together with the vault, were finished. Upon the pillars was placed a lower and an THE TRANSITION FROM NORMAN TO EARLY ENGLISH. 161 upper triforium, with windows and the great vault. Also was made the upper roof where the cross stands aloft, and the roof of the aisles as far as the laying of the lead. The tower was covered in, and many other things done this year. In which year Baldwin, Bishop of Worcester, was elected to the rule of the Church of Canterbury on the eighteenth kalend of January, and was enthroned there on the feast of S. Dunstan next after." We have now to compare the character of the new work of the two Williams, with that of the ancient choir, which it re- placed, bearing in mind that the old fabric was finished in 1 1 10, and that the new works, to the extreme east, were in progress between 1174 and 1185. 1 Of the older fabric, the crypts of the choir, the external walls, and the chapels of S. Anselm and S. Andrew remain ; and with these must be compared the new crypt, eastward of the old choir, the interior of the choir itself, and the whole of the Trinity chapel and of Becket's crown. 2 In the Companion to the Glossary, (plate 29,) separate views are given of the two portions of the crypts, erected by Ernulf and William the Englishman respectively. The former consists of a centre and two aisles, separated by large and massive piers, which bear the pillars of the superimposed choir, and the centre is again subdivided by two rows of comparatively slender pillars. Throughout this work, the shafts, which are cylindrical, and very short, have square, cushion-shaped, unmoulded capitals. The vaulting is quadripartite, with plain flat cross springers, and 1 As might be expected, there are several coincidences of design between the work of William of Sens at Can- terbury, and the cathedral of his native place : these are pointed out by Pro- fessor Willis, (p. 95,) who also notices the resemblances between the Cathe- dral of Caen, commenced by Lanfranc, before he was Archbishop of Canter- bury, and the choir of Canterbury as greatly enlarged by him, (pp. 64, 65 ;) and also between the Cathedral of Canterbury, and that of Rochester, which were both under the charge of Ernulf, first prior of Canterbury, and then Bishop of Rochester, (pp. 65, 87.) Such coincidences as these are among the most interesting subjects of ecclesiological research. 2 It is extremely difficult or almost impossible to make such descriptions as we must give intelligible, without plans, elevations and sections. These will be found in Britton, and Winkles on the Cathedral, in the Companion to the Glossary, and especially in Profes- sor Willis's book, which no student of ecclesiastical architecture ought to be without. 162 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. without ribs at the diagonal groins ; in a word, it is as plain as quadripartite vaulting can be. In the crypt of the Trinity chapel, built by William the Englishman, there are also two aisles, sepa- rated from the central portion by strong piers : but the centre being of less breadth than that of the choir crypt, it is only di- vided into two portions, by a single row of columns. Here the piers and columns are of much greater height than in the more ancient crypt, and more slender in their proportions. The sec- tion of the greater piers is remarkable, being of two intersecting circles, forming as it were twin columns. All the capitals are round, and moulded. The vault is pointed, and all the groins are finished with moulded ribs ; but bosses have not yet made their appearance. Thus we have the principle of the pointed arch fully developed, but as yet with extremely little decora- tion. In the choir, the lower part of the aisle walls, and the bases and parts of the shafts of several pillars of the old fabric remain, and these with Gervase's description have enabled Professor Wil- lis to give diagrams and copious descriptions of Ernulfs choir, and to place the reader in possession of every little change, and every great revolution effected in the restoration after the fire, so that not a base or a moulding remains unappropriated to its rightful owner. It is not, however, for a history of the cathe- dral that we are searching these materials, but for the several indications of a style newly grafted upon one more ancient, so that our work is comparatively simple. First with respect to the masonry, (which is often sufficient alone to determine the date of a building,) the portions of the Norman work are of much smaller stones, and more coarsely jointed. In the vaulting shafts, for instance, there are two or three stones in each course of Ernulfs work, but in the work of William of Sens only one stone, in each course of the cylinder. In the proportions of the several parts, the newer work is always taller and more slender : for instance, the new pillars are raised twelve feet higher than the old ones, though they retain the same thickness, and the same cylindrical form ; and of course, every part of the building, aisles, triforia, and clerestory, are raised in due proportion. The aisle windows are lengthened about three feet eight inches ; but this being insufficient to oc- THE TRANSITION FROM NORMAN TO EARLY ENGLISH. 163 cupy the twelve additional feet of wall, a triforium is added over the window heads. In the older church there was but one tri- forium, in that of William of Sens there were two, one in the usual position over the pier arches, the other in the thickness of the wall at the level of the clerestory windows. Moreover, in Ernulf's church the ceiling was flat, in that of William pointed vaulting rose from about the level of the old ceiling to a point nearly twenty feet above it. Thus, without reference to the character of the several parts, much greater height and light- ness was attained, in the whole fabric, and a greater complica- tion of arrangement was admitted, than would have been con- sistent with the character of the earlier church. There is also greater boldness of construction in the work of William of Sens ; two massive piers, at the intersection of the eastern transept with the choir and its aisles, being dispensed with, and the whole width of the transepts thrown open from the choir. In the still later work of William the Englishman in the Trinity chapel, the double pillars (answering in form and position to those already described in the crypt) give also a lightness and grace of construction wanting in the choir ; and the octopartite vaulting of Becket's crown is a great step in advance of any- thing in the older church, as is also the use of moulded groin- ing ribs, and the occurrence of bosses at their intersections. The vaulting is moreover sexpartite, instead of quadripartite. The circular-headed vault is, however, still retained in the aisles. But the great constructive difference between the new and the old work, and that which is the clue to many minor arrange- ments, is the iutroduction of the pointed arch, which is adopted universally in the great arcades of the choir by William of Sens, and excepting two pairs of round arches in the Trinity chapel, throughout the work of his successor. We shall presently dis- cuss the general results of the introduction of the pointed arch ; I shall only mention here that one of its correlatives, the wide spreading buttress, (and in the Trinity chapel even the flying buttress) is already developed in the work of William the Englishman. Yet there is something apparently arbitrary in the manner of introducing the pointed arch in this restoration, the two forms pointed and round being often singularly associ- m2 164 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. ated ; as for instance, in the triforium of the choir, where two pointed arches are inclosed within one round-headed arch : and the windows of the Trinity chapel are some pointed, some round- headed. At length we descend to ornamental details, and here also wc find a great advance in the newer works upon the Norman style. The marble shafts with which William of Sens relieves three pairs of great pillars, are new, both in character and in material; and the same principle is carried out in the works of his succes- sor, where we also have the slender vaulting shafts banded, as in decided Early English works. The capitals of the pillars assume a much more classical form, as well as greater richness and deli- cacy of chiselling, making the nearest approach of any in Eng- land to the Corinthian capital; and in the triforium of the Trinity chapel the pillars are richly clustered. Grotesque carv- ing on the capitals of the decorative arcades of the older works is not repeated, but several of the Norman mouldings or rather decorations of mouldings, as the billet, the nail-head and the chevron still remain ; though the latter of these has assumed a very different character from the shallow zigzag of early Nor- man : and the dog-tooth, so distinctive of Early English, makes its appearance. In mouldings strictly so called there is no com- parison between the two works, those of the later fabric being much richer and deeper, and more generally used : our limits would hardly admit a larger view of the change effected in a single building by the introduction of the elements of a new style, and we now return to the consideration of one principal feature thus introduced, the pointed arch. Henceforward till the reign of Henry III. we find buildings in all other respects Norman, with the pointed arch of the next style ; and again, buildings with the round arch, but with many Early English details. For instance, in the hall of Oakham castle, which affords a rich and very instructive example of the transition between the two styles, and which is assigned to the period between 1165 and 1191, in the Companion to the Glos- sary, the arches are all round, but the dog-tooth ornament, one of the most distinctive of Early English decorations, appears on one of the capitals : and again at Kirkstall, the pillars are Nor- man in all their characters, the arches are pointed; and the THE TRANSITION FROM NORMAN TO EARLY ENGLISH. 165 clerestory over them is pierced with round-headed windows. Proportions are as much mixed as forms and details. The Galilee of Durham (1180 — 1197) has throughout round arches, but the section of the pillars is Early English, and their propor- tions are light, even for that less massive style. The introduction of the pointed arch is of so much greater importance than any number of separate buildings erected during this time, that we will devote to its effects the remainder of this chapter. The most obvious result of this change is the introduction of a different form into doors, windows, and arcades, which are by far the most observable features of a building, and which give it a great part of its expression. But this is in reality far from being the whole that is due to the introduction of the pointed arch, which is mechanicalhj and constructively of very different character from the round arch, and which indirectly introduced mechanical arrangements which totally altered, not only the details, but the very outline (sometimes even the very ground- plan) of a building. The thrust, or pressure and stress, of the superincumbent weight, upon a circular arch is almost entirely vertical, demand- ing the heavy piers of the Normans, with very slight lateral supports. 1 The aisles and transepts of large churches were in- deed very important lateral supports to the central walls and roof, but they gave more support than was needed, in that direc- tion, and were not constructively intended for that purpose ; and the buttresses of the Normans were almost useless, as indeed they were not introduced as mechanical aids to construction. They were mere shallow pilasters decorating the walls, and pro- moting harmony of design, by carrying the eye upward from the base-moulding to the corbel-table ; but all that they seemed to support was often the parapet, and they really did support nothing. On the other hand, the thrust of the pointed arch is in a great degree lateral ; and now the piers have to support less weight, and may be more slender in proportion ; the sides of the build- 1 Thus mechanically, as well as in retained much of the classical charac- several of its forms, the Norman style ter. 166 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. ing have to resist more pressure, and the walls require lateral support. The aisles and transepts of the larger churches are now mechanically necessary, but even these are not sufficient for the support of the towers, and central walls, and roofs : but- tresses also are carried out, with an enlarged base, to support the weight thrown upon the sides of the building. And very often the aisles are even constructively, as well as in fact, huge but- tresses, or lateral support, the vaulting-ribs connecting the aisle walls with the clerestory, to which they become real, though masked, flying buttresses. The buttresses increase in projection, as the architects of succeeding styles depend less and less on the strength of the pillars, and calculate more and more for the lateral thrust, until at last in King's College Chapel, they em- brace separate oratories within their enormous bases ; and all through the Decorated and Perpendicular styles, they very well answer to Mr. CockerelFs picturesque description of them in the works of William of Wykeham, "grasping the soil of their foundation with digitated extensors, always proportioned to their perpendicular and lateral pressures." 1 Now compare the lines of the essential features of a church in the later, and in the Norman era. There is not, in the Nor- man style, until we come to the roof, a single necessary approach to the pyramidal form. Nothing converges upwards; nothing spreads laterally as it reaches the ground. On the other hand, as soon as the pointed arch is introduced into vaulting and other portions of the building, there is an outward pressure from the apex of the roof downwards, which demands a support, and but- tresses are thrust out to a proportionate extent, till they reach the ground at the point where the lateral pressure demands ef- fective resistance. In other words, from the apex of the roof to the very ground all diverges downwards, or (which is the same thing) converges upwards ; and a pyramidal form is the result. This is the real origin of the verticality of Gothic architecture. It comes at last to have additional developments, and it has ac- cepted the high office of a symbol of theological dogmas ; but still it is in its origin essentially constructive, and it owes its birth, not to the doctrines of the Church, or the cha- 1 Paper read at the Winchester meeting of the Archaeological Institute, p. 44. THE TRANSITION FROM NORMAN TO EARLY ENGLISH. 167 racter of Churchmen, but to the introduction of the pointed arch. 1 The spire and the pinnacle seem at first independent efflores- cences of the vertically of the pointed style ; and the spire in- deed is so, though it is but an extension of the tower-roof, which had already begun to assume considerable elevation in the twelfth century ; but the pinnacle is really a part of the but- tress, and so one of the corollaries of the pointed arch. It gives greater weight to the buttresses, and so greater lateral support to the building ; and where it occurs as a part of the flying but- tress, rising just over the spring of the arch, which props the mass against which it leans, by throwing upon it the weight of some distant portion of the building, the pinnacle has a very visible effect in retaining the equilibrium of the whole mass. We must not however look in the transition from Norman to Early English for actual examples of well -developed verticality on these principles. The buttress was still shallow even in the Semi-Norman, and the walls retained a thickness which would have been unnecessary, had the buttress assumed its proper place and received its full development. Eor the perfection of verticality we must look to the future styles, when these forms were fully developed, which now struggled, a living though un- conscious embryo, within the narrow shell out of which they were soon to burst forth in power and beauty. We must now go back to the work of the two Williams, for a different purpose. We have seen that the great fire happened in 1174. The murder of Thomas a Becket had occurred but four years previ- ous, but in the interim that prelate had been canonized; and " the martyrdom," as the place where he fell was called, and his tomb in the crypt of the chapel of the Holy Trinity, had already become objects of great veneration in the eyes of all Christendom, and sources of vast wealth to the convent. When, therefore, the rebuilding was undertaken, very great additions were made to the cathedral, with especial reference to the martyr. The place where he was murdered was in the north 1 To avoid misconception, I may retained with a symbolical meaning, here anticipate a future claim for this though of course not without a con- verticality of Gothic architecture to be structive use. 168 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. transept, and on the spot where he fell an altar was erected. The transept communicated with the church by a pillar and its arches, and this pillar was removed that the altar might be seen from distant parts of the church. Such was the arrangement of the martyrdom before the fire. The body of Becket was buried in the crypt beneath the Trinity chapel ; almost, that is, at the extreme end of the crypt, which extended eastward from the great cross, to the extremity of the church. But the relics of S. Thomas required a yet more remarkable resting place : and though the choir of Canterbury Cathedral was already of much greater size than that of any other church in the kingdom, and the crypt was even more pre-eminent above all others, the devotion of the convent was not satisfied without extending both the crypt and the superstructure eastward, in two very marked additional features. These were called respectively Becket's chapel, and Beckers crown, singular in their arrange- ments, and of a form which it would require drawings to make intelligible. Thus the murder of S. Thomas of Canterbury has to this day a very remarkable influence on the cathedral in which his throne had been erected. And here we shall take occasion to observe on other instances in which the form of the church was modified by some singular devotion to the patron saint. The instance which occurs most uniformly is in the relative position of the chapel of our Lady, which is almost invariably eastward of the high altar itself : indicating that peculiar .reve- rence by which the Holy Virgin was elevated into a more imme- diate, if not a higher place, in the affections and devotions of the people of the middle ages, than our Blessed Lord had Himself. A singular instance occurs at Durham. The supposed antipathy of S. Cuthbert to women, had caused all females to be shut out of the cathedral, or at least they were not allowed to approach nearer eastward than a few paces within the south door. Hugh Pudsey, Bishop from 1153 to 1197, compassionating their sad case, built for them the Galilee, at the west end of the church, in which they might be present at the celebration of the Holy Mysteries. The instances in which the reputation of the saint influenced the splendour of the church, without creating any singular ar- THE TRANSITION FROM NORMAN TO EARLY ENGLISH. 169 rangement were without number. Thus the ancient West- minster Abbey fell a sacrifice to the zeal of Henry III., which could not rest without dedicating a more splendid fane to the honour of the Confessor. The cathedral of Ely was vastly in- creased on account of the reputation of S. Etheldreda, the patron saint. Gloucester flourished, and its visible glories were marvel- lously augmented after Edward II. had found a tomb there. Our Lady of Walsingham had a glorious return for the wealth which she brought to the abbey of that place in the magnificent church which attested the devotions of her worshippers. The way in which the legends of the saints or some local his- tory suggested the subject of decorations should rather be treated as a part of the history of the fine arts in connexion with archi- tecture. We may however just allude to the bas-relief on the doorway of Croyland, where the life of S. Guthlac is related in several medallions of statues in the octagon, and to the Lady chapel of Ely cathedral, in which the legendary history of S. Etheldreda, and of the Blessed Virgin find in like manner their appropriate places. 170 CHAPTER IX. The Symbolism of Ecclesiastical Architecture. Necessity of treating the subject. — Early Instances of Symbolism. — Round Church at Fulda. — Dream of the Monk of Bury. — Authority of Durandus. — His Rationale. — Definition of Sym- bolism. — The Definition applied to various instances. — Saxon Symbolism. — Norman. — Subsequent Styles. — Symbolism still existing. From a modified construction of certain parts of the building due to the influence of some favourite saints, the transition is but slight to the symbolism which pervades Christian art uni- versally, and Christian architecture in particular. The history of ecclesiastical architecture cannot indeed be treated philosophically, without reference to the question of symbolism ; for even if the whole theory involved in this term were false, it would be necessary to account for its rise and very general adoption, (though in different forms and degrees,) by recent ecclesiologists ; but it is quite certain that symbolism has a real and very important existence in every branch of eccle- siastical art ; and that in church architecture in particular, it has, from the beginning, much modified the general structure and the details of sacred edifices. Those who are least dis- posed to admit its claim to be classed among the principles of church-building, must still design their churches with submis- sion to several laws, which have no basis but that of symbolism; and the coldest utilitarian must, in spite of himself and his principles, judge the works of an age, least of all disposed to sacrifice to the fancies of former generations, by rules to which symbolism has given existence, and all their force. Whatever may become of particular applications of the prin- ciple, this at least is certain, that there is a symbolical spirit and a system of symbols in the ecclesiastical architecture of the first THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 171 and middle ages. Those who now interpret the symbolic lan- guage into the expression of high doctrines of our most holy faith, are not necessarily working out a fanciful system from forms and combinations in which no meaning was ever before suspected, as Quarles works out his " Emblems/' or Fuller his " Thoughts," from all kinds of things and occurrences. On the contrary, the principle of symbolism is clearly asserted in parts, or as a whole, by authors who lived long before the greater part of the churches at present existing were erected, and it was ac- knowledged and acted upon throughout the middle ages. Of this we have abundant proof in the plain assertions of the primi- tive Fathers, 1 and even in the Canons of the early Church, 2 while in many cases where there is no explicit assertion of the principle of symbolism, there is what is even stronger, an un- forced allusion to it, in which its general adoption is implied. 3 I shall give three early and striking instances, not hitherto ad- duced, in which the principle is recognized, in the two first directly, in the third indirectly, but not less evidently. William 4 of Malrasbury describing the church at Glastonbury, says, " In the pavement may be remarked on every side stones designedly interlaid in triangles, and squares, and figured with lead, under which, if I believe some sacred enigma to be con- tained, I do no injustice to religion." The value of this extract is not diminished by the way in which the Chronicler refrains, as if 1 As for instance in the Pastor of Hermas, Vision III., and in the ac- count which Eusebius gives of the plan of the Church of the Resurrec- tion, built by Constantine. 2 The Apostolic Constitutions direct that the church shall be built in the form of a ship : — " "When thou callest an assembly of the Church, as one that is the com- mander of a great ship, appoint the assemblies to be made with all possible skill ; charging the deacons, as mari- ners, to prepare places for the brethren, as for passengers, with all care and decency. And first, let the church be long, like a ship, looking towards the east, with its vestries on either side at the east end. In the centre let the Bishop's throne be placed, and let the presbyters be seated on both sides of him ; and let the deacons stand near at hand, in close and small garments, for they are like the mariners and managers of the ship," &c. — Book ii. sec. 28. 3 For instance, in the panegyrist of Paulinus in Eusebius, referred to at great length in the Essay on Sacra- mentality, (pp. lxx. &c.) by the trans- lators of the first book of the Rationale Divinorum Officiorum of Durandus. 4 Chronicle, I. 2. 172 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. in ignorance, from offering a solution of these figures on the pavement : it is enough that he evidently assumes them to have had a religious meaning. Eigil, Abbot of Fulda, (circa a.d. 820) built, with the consent of the brethren, a little round church in the cemetery, which Candidus, the contemporary author of his life, thus describes. The part of it under the ground, where it encircles a hollow vault, rose from one stone column set in the midst, throwing out arches to the circumference on all sides ; but above the ground it was raised upon eight columns, and one stone (key-stone) finished the whole work at the top. This edifice the abbot with his companions erected under Divine teaching, figuring some great thing ; I know not what, but conceive that it may be con- sidered (without derogation of the faith) a figure of Christ and the Church. For the Apostle Paul, who is himself called by the Lord a chosen vessel, thus speaks of the Church of Christ built up of living stones, that is of holy men, to be the habita- tion of God : For the temple of God is holy, which temple are ye ; and of this structure Christ is the beginner and builder ; the foundation and columns, ever remaining fixed by virtue of His eternal majesty, in Whom the whole building joined to- gether increases into a holy temple in the Lord. And what the finishing of the building above with one stone signifies the same teacher declares, who will have us pray with earnest hearts, that He Who hath begun in us a good work will also finish it against the day of Christ ; forasmuch as all our works have their be- ginning in God, and by Him what we have begun is finished. And the eight columns standing in the temple of God may sha- dow forth the eight beatitudes, which the Lord Himself sets together in the Gospel ; so that those who fulfil these two qua- ternions of duties, deserve to be accounted props in the Church of Christ. But the round form of the church having no end, and encircling the principles of life, that is the Divine Sacra- ment, may fairly be taken to signify the kingdom of Eternal Majesty, and the hope of life everlasting, and the never-fading rewards with which the just shall be finally crowned. 1 Such is the description of the church at the cemetery at 1 Vita Eigilis Abb. Fuldensis. Mabilloni A. S. Ben. V. 226. THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 173 Fulda in the prose narrative of Candidus : his metrical account of the same history is so nearly identical with the above, that I shall transcribe it in the note instead of the passage which I have almost literally translated. 1 It can only be necessary to call attention to the strong asser- tions, that the abbot intended to signify some divine thing, that he was under the divine teaching, when he so arranged his work that it should serve this purpose. As for the particular inter- pretations so modestly suggested by Candidas, it is unimportant to the present stage of the inquiry, whether they be false or true. The third example, which is at least equally curious, and 1 " Parvam qua corpora Fra- trum Hie defuncta jacent devote namque rotundam Condidit ecclesiam, latitans qua pervia crypta Sub tellure latet, una quae rite columna Incipit, ac supra octonis subrecta co- lumnis, Praepulcre in summo lapide concludi- tur uno. Hoc opus hoc etenim divino munere docti Pastor, et ipse simul infantum Doctor honestus Cum sociis jaciunt alto sinuamine mentis, Nescio quid magni fingentes arte fe- cunda, Quod tamen ipse reor, salva menteque fideque, Istius Ecclesise et Christi praeferre figuram. Templum quippe Dei Sanctum est, quod Paulus aperte Christicolas esse Christi vas personat ipse. "Cujus tecturse princeps et conditor adstat Arbiter ipse Deus, fundamentumque, columna Inconcussa manens semper virtute per- enni. Qua fidei merito nunc hie plebs advena Christo Subrigitur, templumque Deo coalescit in almum. Quod vero in summo lapide concludi- tur uno, Edocet ipse monens, intenta mente rogandum Egregius Doctor, ut qui virtute po- tenti in Nobis coepit opus placitum, dignetur in altum Perficere Jesu, donee manifesta mi- cando, Ac famosa dies Christi procedat in or- bem. Octonse interius stantes hincque inde columnar, Totque beatitudinibus aptantur, ut apte. Quique quater bina heec complentes dicta Tonantis, In hac a;de Dei fulcra mereantur haberi. Circulus ecclesiae quinullo fine rotundus Clauditur ; interius complectens com- moda vitse, Spem quoque vitse perpetuae regnum- que perenne, ac Prsemia mansura post hanc signare videtur, Vitam quis justi merito vittantur in sevum." — Ibid. p. 244. 174 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. equally conclusive of a habit of giving mystical meanings to the parts of churches, occurs in the chronicles of Joscelin of Brake- lond, where a dream of one of his brethren of the monastery is represented as influencing in some degree, or at least presaging, the election of an abbot of Bury S. Edmund. The interpre- tation of the dream turns on the mystical reference of certain portions of the church to parts of the human body ; which can only have originated from the connection between the cross form of the church, and the cross on which Christ suffered as the instrument and symbol of His atonement. " There sat along with us," says the Chronicler, " another brother, Edmund by name, asserting that Sampson was about to be abbot, and narrating the vision he had seen the previous night. He said, he beheld in his dream Roger the cellarer and Hugh the third prior, standing before the altar, and Sampson in the midst, taller by the shoulders upward, wrapt round with a long gown down to his feet looped over his shoulders, and standing as a champion ready to do battle. And as it seemed to him in his dream, S. Edmund arose from his shrine, and, as if sickly, showed his feet and naked legs, and some one approaching and desiring to cover the feet of the saint, the saint said 'Approach me not; behold, he shall veil my feet. — pointing with his finger towards Sampson. This is the in- terpretation of the dream : — by his seeming to be a champion is signified, that the future abbot should always be in travail ; at one time moving a controversy against the Archbishop of Canterbury, concerning the pleas of the crown, at another time against the knights of S. Edmund, to compel them to pay entire escurages, at another time with the burgesses for standing in the market, at another time with the sokemen for the suits of the hundreds ; even as a champion who willeth by fighting to overcome his adversaries, that he may be able to regain the rights and liberties of his church ; but he veiled the feet of the holy martyr when he perfectly completed the towers of the church, commenced a hundred years before. Such dreams as these did our brethren dream, which were im- mediately published throughout the cloister, afterwards through the court- lodge, so that before the evening it was a matter of common talk amongst the townsfolk, they saying this man and that man are elected, and one of them will be abbot." We now arrive, in order of time, and very conveniently for our subject, at Durandus, Bishop of Mende, in the thirteenth century, by whom the application of the principle of symbolism was carried out more largely than it had before been, in his book THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 175 entitled, Rationale Divinorum Officiorum, a work alike remarka- ble for the direct, and for the indirect testimony, which it affords to the system : for Durandus was a man worthy of the very high estimation in which he was held by his contemporaries ; and if the character of the man gives weight to his writings, so does the value which was set upon this work in particular evince the degree in which he either led or went along with the religious feeling, and the principles of his day. The Rationale was the first work from the pen of an uninspired writer ever printed, and the translators enumerate nine editions between 1459 and 1609, which have come under their notice, while Chalmers mentions, besides the first, thirteen editions in the fifteenth, and as many in the sixteenth century. With the stu- dent of ecclesiastical architecture, it may perhaps have even more weight, that this book was one which William of Wyke- ham bequeathed expressly to his new foundation at Winchester, together with his mitre and his Bible. 1 Indeed the work is worthy of the man, and of the high repute in which it was once held. But though it is fully sufficient to justify the assertion that symbolism was in his day and had long- been a recognized principle in ecclesiastical art, and in the erec- tion of churches especially, it must not be used in this question as determining the recognized or rather intended symbolical mean- ing of every thing to which he alludes. He himself calls his book, not a treatise on " the Symbolism of Churches and Church Ornaments," but " Rationale Divinorum Officiorum " because the reasons of the variations in Divine offices and their truths are therein set forth and manifested ; and he justifies his choice of a title by a very graceful allusion to the Breastplate of Judg- ment (Rationale judicii in the Vulgate, and in the Septuagint Aoyeiov 7% xpio-sug) which Aaron wore, and in which were placed the Urim and Thummim, Manifestation and Truth, (Doctrinam et Veritatem, Vulg. ryv dsKaoaiv xa) ryv aX^siav, LXX.) And so in his work, his Rationale, the pious author proposes to set forth the doctrine and the truths expressed in the several offices of the 1 Item lego collegio meo Winton. aliam mitram meam planam aurifregi- atam, ac Bibliam meam usialem, item librum vocatum " Catholicon." Item librum vocatum " Rationale Divino- rum," etc. 176 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Church, which the prelates and priests of churches ought faith- fully to preserve in the shrine of their breasts. And as the breastplate was woven of four colours and of gold ; so, says he, the principles on which are founded the variations in ecclesiasti- cal offices, take the hues of the four senses, the Historic, the Allegoric, the Tropologic, and the Anagogic, with Faith as the ground. So, for instance, Jerusalem is understood Historically, of that earthly city whither pilgrims journey ; Allegorically, of the Church militant ; Tropologically , of every faithful soul ; Anagogically, of the celestial Jerusalem, which is our country ; " but in this work," he adds, " many senses are applied, and speedy changes are made from one to another, as the diligent reader will perceive." The reader should however be discrimi- nating as well as diligent, lest he overlook the different degrees in which those several principles, and the application of them to particular forms or usages, bear upon the question of sym- bolism. In short we must not take Durandus to have accomplished more than he professes to have aimed at, or we shall assuredly either pervert his authority, or set him down as having treated fancifully, at best, a subject which will bear a far more rigid method. For instance, in his chapter on bells, he says that " the rope by which the tongue is moved against the bell is hu- mility, or the life of the preacher, and that the same rope also showeth the measure of our own life and a great deal more of the same kind : now if Durandus is here taken to imply, that the bell-rope is intended to convey such lessons, or that it was so arranged, and left dependent, that it might convey them, we should accuse him of trifling ; but if we read his words as those of a very pious man, accustomed to moralize all the offices and instruments of the Church, with which he was daily conversant, we shall find few more interesting and instructive chapters than that on bells. If we learn with him to find " Sermons in stones and good in every thing," we shall not quarrel with him because he does not either prove, or desire to prove, that every thing from which he draws a lesson was really intended to convey that lesson, or was, in the sense in which the term must be used in treating of ecclesiastical art, symbolic, or significant of Christian doctrine. THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 177 We may imagine the different spirit in which Durandus, and some modern advocate of ecclesiastical symbolism, would dis- course on the structure and details of a Gothic church. Duran- dus would be reading a lesson to his own soul, from every thing around him : from the pavement he would learn humility, be- cause the Psalmist saith, Adhcesit pavimento anima mea ; from the windows opening wide inward, but with a narrow aperture with- out, he would teach his senses to present the smallest possible surface to the world, but to diffuse more widely the materials of divine contemplation ; from the roof he would preach to himself the exercise of charity, because charity covereth a multitude of sins : on the other hand, the more fanciful interpreter of an- cient emblems would be using these and the like sentences to prove that the mediaeval architects paved their churches, because a pavement symbolizes humility ; made their windows with a wider splay within than without, because the Christian has made a covenant with his eyes and other senses, not to be too much conversant with worldly things ; and covered their churches with a roof, because any covering may be made by an application of Holy Writ to symbolize charity. With Durandus we would walk still in the house of our God, and seek no better guide than his Rationale : with his too apt pupil we should scarcely pass the threshold of the sacred edifice, without some misgivings of his fitness to read the mystic characters by which we were surrounded. And we are persuaded that the cause of symbolism will lose nothing, by setting aside the moralizing of Durandus; for al- though a great part of his work is not conversant with what can be called strictly symbolical, and although he applies every kind of interpretation to whatever can be made, by any means, to render a moral or a religious lesson, yet he supplies many in- stances of purely symbolical interpretation. For instance, he says, (c Some churches are built in the shape of a cross, to sig- nify that we are crucified to the world, and should tread in the steps of the Crucified, according to that saying, If any man WILL COME AFTER Me, LET HIM DENY HIMSELF, AND TAKE up his cross, and follow Me and again, in the furniture of the church, u The rail, by which the altar is divided from the choir, teacheth the separation of things celestial from things ter- N 178 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. restrial." These, and many like passages, actually prove the general question so far as his authority is concerned; and also as far as the fact is concerned that a symbolic spirit was recognized in his time, in the sacred edifice, and its several parts. Let us, before we go farther, for the credit of our own sense, and in justice to those whom we bring into the question, con- sider what we mean by symbolism in churches. What does, and what does not fall under that name ? In the first place, then, pictures and other representations are not symbols of what they represent. It is essential to a symbol, properly so called, that it be not, nor pretend to be, a simple representation ; for if it be, it loses its allusive character, it is no longer a figure but a picture of the thing represented. Thus, for instance, the figures of the Four Evangelists are not symbols of those Evangelists ; but the figures of a man, an angel, an ox, and an eagle are : yet the figures of these and other servants of God may become sym- bols of other things, as for instance, of the Communion of Saints. A picture or figure of our Lord on the cross, is not symbolical of the Crucifixion ; but certain arrangements of the several parts of the figures may symbolize particular branches of the doctrine of Atonement. A picture of the great judgment is not symbolical, but a mere representation ; but the place where it is found, as on the arch between the nave and the chancel, may symbolize the truth that the judgment precedes our admis- sion into the Kingdom of Heaven. 1 Our definition also excludes from the number of symbols, strictly so called, those forms by which certain tones of religious feeling, and certain religious or political conditions, have been clothed upon, so to speak ; so that the form which has grown 1 I subjoin a passage from Fuller's History of Waltham Abbey, not for its spirit, or indeed for its information in a general sense, but for the clearness with which he assigns a symbolical meaning to the position which the rood holds, instead of to the rood itself. " The rood was an image of Christ on the cross, made generally of wood, and erected in a loft for that purpose, just over the passage out of the church into the chancel. And wot you what spi- ritual mystery was couched in this po- sition thereof? The church (forsooth) typified the Church militant, the chan- cel represents the Church triumphant: and all who will pass out of the former into the latter, must go under the rood loft : that is, carry the cross, and be acquainted with affliction." THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 179 over it and out of it, maintains a certain harmony with the plastic spiritual element. The massiveness of a Norman, or the gorgeousness of a Tudor, church, can no more be said to sym- bolize the sturdier or the more luxurious character of the age, to which they owed their respective forms, than the shape and texture of a man's jerkin can be said to symbolize his size and character. They stand in the relation of the effect to the cause, not in that of the symbol to its antitype. If I find a richly embroidered shirt of a certain size, I do not recognize in it a symbol of the existence of a man of such a height and such a degree of refinement or foppery. It indicates the existence of such a man, it is true, but it is not a figure of the man, or of his conditions, even in the laxest sense of the term, still less in the restricted sense of a symbol. And so such results of the power of the immaterial and moral over the material, may ex- press the pervading feeling of the Church ; and they may sug- gest it afterwards, and even by-and-bye they may symbolize it, having been adopted for that purpose ; but they do not symbolize it by the simple fact that they arise out of it by an unconscious growth. Thus its vertically, the most fascinating, the most distinctive characteristic of Gothic architecture, will cease to be accounted symbolic, if it has no other claim than its growth out of the up- ward aspirations of Christians i 1 if this principle arose uncon- sciously out of the doctrines of the Church, and was never avowedly adopted to embody their spirit to the sense, they have still a beauty and propriety which we maintain against all comers ; but they can hardly be said to symbolize the Resurrection, or our hope of immortality. If, however, they were afterwards ac- cepted as embodying these doctrines, and used thenceforward on that account, or even inclusively with that intention, then are they among the legitimate symbolisms of ecclesiastical architec- ture. 1 We have already seen in the last ment is, that even in the latter sup- chapter, that the verticality of Gothic position it would not therefore be architecture has a constructive, and symbolical, though it might the more not a mystical origin, or even a growth probably be accepted as, and so become out of invisible tendencies or associa- symbolical in future ages, tions of Churchmen. But our argu- n2 180 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Excluding pictures and sculpture therefore, as such, and also forms which are characteristic of those with whom they originated, though not intended to embody character, we include under the term symbols, first and chiefly, whatever in itself, its accidents or accessories, was originally designed, besides its direct use, to signify some doctrine or Christian rule, state, or privilege ; and secondly, whatever has been since its first introduction accepted as conveying such a meaning, and afterwards on that account chosen before other things equally useful, but not accepted as expressive. This definition, of course, excludes all necessary parts of a building, as the walls or the roof, simply as such 3 but it does not exclude any arbitrary forms or arrangements of these which might or might not be otherwise : as, for instance, orien- tation, and the ship-like excess of length over breadth. Every church must point some way, but that all, (to speak generally, and the exceptions are few in England,) point one way, and that way towards the east, indicates a design beyond any constructive convenience; and we find that the design actu- ally was to point to the place of the rising sun, the symbol of the Christian's Saviour, and of his future expectations. 1 Most churches without any especial meaning would be longer in one direction than another, but the very name of nave, or navis, for the longer part of the church, together with the Apostolical Canons before referred to, and the constant use of a ship as a type of the Church in the Sacred Scriptures, and in all theology, have sanctified a form which would otherwise have been indiffer- ent, into the type of a mystery. 2 1 As examples and authorities are always interesting, in proportion as they are connected with manners and customs, I transcribe from Staveley the following paragraph from an ancient homily to be read at Church wakes : — " Leteus think that Crist dyed in the Este, and therefore lete us pray besely into the Este, that we may be of the nombre that He died for, and lete us think that He shall coome out of the Este to the doom : wherefore lete us pray heretily to Him allsoe, and besely, that wee may have grace and contrition in our hartes for our misdeeds, with shrift and satisfaction, that wee may stond that day on the right honde of our Lord Jesu Crist, &c." — Staveley, pp. 155, 156. 2 Bede in his book " De Linguis Gentium " says, the ark of Noah is doubtless a type of the Church ; and he distributes its chambers thus, "Hie (i.e. at the top) Noe and his signify the body of Christ ; hie (also in the roof) the birds are the type of the Martyrs ; hie (below them) the sheep are the type of virginity ; hie (lower down) THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 181 Neither does our definition exclude those things which have been first employed, simply for their constructive use, but have acquired a meaning since ; as, for instance, pillars, which were obviously anterior in their use to any Christian symbolism, but which were afterwards in many cases clearly designed to signify the Apostles, 1 or other eminent saints. I have been thus careful in excluding false symbolism, as well as asserting the general principle, because I believe that one great effort of the advocate of the principles of symbolism must be to guard against the very strong temptation to find symbols every- where, and where they cannot be found, to invent them. The mere arbitrary assigning of a symbolical meaning to what there is no proof was ever used or accepted as symbolical, is surely un- scientific. We involuntarily demur when, without a single argu- ment that bears directly on the question, we find it asserted that certain windows symbolize the Wounds in our Lord's Side and in His Feet ; or that in order " to denote that all that the Church has, and all she is, is from above, the stringcourse, springing from the eastern triplet, runs round the whole church, (often both within and without,) binding it, as it were, in, and connect- ing every other light, with those at the east." 2 When we find that such applications are gravely made of the principle of sym- bolism, we either start aside from the thing itself, or shrewdly suspect that our friends have taken the words of John Bunyan as their motto, " Having now my method by the end, Still as I pulled it came." We conclude, then, that to accept all the recent attempts to find symbolical meanings in churches, and in their different de- tails ; or even to convert all the moral reflections of Durandus upon the parts of churches into legitimate symbolical interpre- tations, would be to admit that there is a dormant symbolism in those animals which do not eat flesh are a type of wedlock ; hie (lower still) the animals which eat flesh are a type of violent men and sinners ; hie (low- est of all) where they throw the dung, is a type of hell." 1 And this as early at least as the time of Constantine, who surrounded the Holy Sepulchre with twelve pillars, after the number of the Apostles. 2 Essay on Sacramentality, p. lxli. 182 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. ecclesiastical art, which any one may awaken at any time, and in the most arbitrary manner ; an assertion which respect for the principles of symbolism forbids us to admit. But it is undoubt- edly true, and most important, that there is a nascent and germinant symbolism in ecclesiastical art, arising out of its ap- propriateness to its several purposes, and out of the law which imposes on material forms something in harmony with the wants or feelings out of which they have grown. Such forms are ever ready to become (though they were not so originally) symbols of that ritualism to which they owed their existence, and of that character which they at first expressed by a law quite distinct from that of symbols. And the bursting forth of these forms into a new life, instinct with a recognized meaning, is a highly interesting and practical part of the history of symbolism, and of the reciprocal influence of ecclesiastical art, and of Christian doctrine on each other. And at the present revival of church architecture, it becomes a question how far on this ground many forms which were perhaps not accepted as symbolical in the six- teenth century, yet having had a soul given to them by the ex- pression of the deep feelings of reverent men, awakened by them and associated with them, are not now to be recognized as sym- bolical, and their use exacted, or at least desired on that account in future religious edifices. It is almost superfluous to remark, that besides this nascent and germinant symbolism, there is that which had from its first existence the fulness of its life and vigour, and sprang forth, (as Minerva from the head of Jupiter,) complete in itself, not wait- ing for its force till it was adopted, or interpreted, but symboli- cal in its very birth and first intention. Such is the symbolism of the Atonement by the cross-form of our churches, and of the separate orders in the Church by its separation into nave and chancel, after the type of the Holy place, and the Holy of Holies. Such are also some of the essential symbolisms of branches of ecclesiastical art ancillary to architecture, as of painting and sculpture : the distinguishing marks of the virgins, martyrs, and confessors among saints ; and of particular saints in each com- pany : such emblems of the Atonement as the pelican in her piety ; of the Holy Eucharist as the Lamb pouring its blood into a chalice ; of the offices or states of Christ as the good Shep- THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 183 herd, or the Lamb triumphant. Such again are the emblemati- cal allusions in the rich surface-carving of early times, and afterwards in the capitals, brackets, or bosses which so richly adorn our finest churches ; as for instance, the Christian soldier opposing a shield charged with a cross to the attacks of fiery serpents, in which the Christian vow in Holy Baptism is figured; 1 the birds making their nests in the foliage of a capital, in allu- sion to the text, " The sparrow hath found an house, and the swallow a nest for herself, where she may lay her young, even Thine altars, Lord of Hosts/" 2 But in such instances as the latter, we must distinguish between a representation and a sym- bol. Except in the Church, these would be mere renderings of a parable in the language of sculpture : in the Church 3 they symbolize the truth that the house of God is a refuge for the meek and lowly. Having now endeavoured, with what success we do not ven- ture to say, to clear the general subject from some misrepresen- tations and confusion of terms, we may give a short summary of the history of symbolism in its effects on ecclesiastical architec- ture in England. There are but very few remains of Saxon architecture of such extent as to retain what may originally have presented a sym- bolic arrangement. We find, however, in ground plans, the 1 On the font of Thorpe Ernald, in Leicestershire. 2 Psalm lxxxiv. 3. See also Psalm civ. 16, 17, and S. Matthew xiii. 31, 32. 3 Or perhaps in a conventual church there may be a more restricted applica- tion of this figure in the way of sym- bolical representation. Gildas, in his reproof of Maglocune, (the imperso- nation doubtless of a class) who seems to have broken his monastic vow, ap- plies this figure to that more limited number of Christians, who have taken refuge in a monastic life from the temptations of the world. " Didst thou not as a dove, which cleaves the yielding air with its pinions, and by its rapid turns escapes the furious hawk, safely return to the cells where the saints repose, as a most certain place of refuge ?" And Archdeacon Churton translates a Saxon version of the 84th Psalm in the same spirit. " Lord, to me Thy minsters are Courts of honour, passing fair : And my spirit deems it well There to be, and there to dwell : Heart and flesh would fain be there, Lord, Thy life, Thy love to share. There the sparrow speeds her home, And in time the turtles come, Safe their nestling young they rear, Lord of Hosts, Thine altars near ; Dear to them Thy grace, — but more To the souls who there adore." 184 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. principle of orientation recognized ; we find the ternary arrange- ment into nave and aisles, which is symbolical of the doctrine of the Trinity ; and in one church, that at Brixworth, there seems to have been a three-fold chancel-arch, intensifying the former symbol. We know of two Saxon churches only which were built in the form of a cross, 1 so far as we can learn from existing remains, that of Worth, in Sussex, and that in the castle at Dover. 2 The cross-form is so evidently to be referred to the intention of figuring the Atonement, that there can be no hesi- tation in admitting this among the highest of pure symbols employed by the Saxons : the division of the body of the church into nave and aisles may have been, and indeed certainly was, adopted from the Roman basilica, but it was retained and con- secrated by perpetual use in the Church, while other basilican arrangements were at once modified, and gradually dropped. The division of the church into nave and chancel, signifying and effecting the distinction between the clergy and the laity, and also symbolizing the separation between the Church below and the Church above, and the entrance into the latter through the " triumphal 99 or chancel-arch of death, may be added to the symbolical arrangements of churches before the Norman inva- sion. In details we have the spire, though at present very low, as in the illuminations of Csedmon's paraphrase, (where it is surmounted by the cock,) and in the representation of Bosham church, in the Bayeaux tapestry ; and we have the constructive use of bonding courses set upright, instead of horizontally, as in Roman masonry, originating the vertical lines of after styles, so that we have already, what has at length, if never before, been admitted into the rank of symbols as a figure of the Christian's aspirations after his heavenly home. The Norman era rejected none of the older symbolisms, but as a natural consequence of the progress of architecture, and of 1 But sufficient stress does not seem sanctuary at Westminster, (which he to have been laid on the cross-form of says was at least of the age of Edward every church that has west tower, a the Confessor, though, if his drawing nave with aisles, and a chancel. be correct, it is most likely at least two 2 According to the plan given by centuries later,) was in the form of a Dr. Stukeley in the first vol. of the Greek cross. A very rare form in Archseologia, the old church of the England. THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 185 the arts, and also by direct purpose to symbolize additional truth, added several new ones. The ground plan even of small churches now often assumes a longitudinal, as well as a lateral ternary arrangement ; and that for no apparent purpose, but simply that it may afford an additional figure of the great Chris- tian doctrine of the Trinity. The same doctrine finds its ex- pression in the three arcades of the interior, the nave-arches, the triforium, and the clerestory ; and in the exterior elevation of the larger churches in that most glorious expression of a glori- ous truth, the three towers. In the absence of all evidence, (which indeed cannot in the nature of things be had,) we should be disposed to refer the former of these arrangements to adopted, the latter to intended symbolisms : at any rate their hold was soon fully established, and they were worthy of the high office universally committed to them. The excessive number and variety of carvings in the richer Norman churches, full of mean- ing as they generally are, seem to render the history of symbo- lism in Norman ecclesiastical decorations very complicated ; but we shall find it much simplified by a little careful arrangement. And first of all, mere representations of the events connected with the church or neighbourhood are not symbols, but orAy pic- ture histories. So also a parable or an allegory represented in stone, continues still but a parable or allegory, or a kind of homily upon it, or application of it, but not at all in the way of symbol, not so as to heighten, but only so as to retain the figure already there. The same is true of the representation of Scrip- ture history. A sculpture of our Lord's Baptism or Crucifixion, in a Norman church, is no more necessarily symbolical, than a painting of the same subject by Raphael or Michael Angelo ; but the position of such a subject may give it a symbolical meaning ; as the Baptism of our Lord, not uncommon on Nor- man fonts, symbolizes the truth that by His Baptism water is sanctified to the mystical washing away of sin : and the Cruci- fixion on the chancel-arch indicates that through the death of Christ only is our death the way to eternal life. Of this class of symbols the number is well nigh infinite in the surface- sculpture of the Normans. We would state then the amount of symbolism in the Norman era thus. The great lines of the ground plan and elevation still 186 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. symbolize the distinction between the clergy and the laity, and between the Church Militant and the Church Triumphant, and also the great mysteries of the Trinity and the Atonement. And besides these, the great amount of surface-carving being highly figurative in some of its devices, and capable of a sym- bolical meaning by the position in which it was placed, or some occasional adjunct, affords many symbolisms of detail, in which the great truths of the Gospel, its laws and privileges, are brought down to the individual, and addressed to him in a prac- tical form. The theory of symbolisms seems now perfected, though its developement was still progressing. In the next style we lose in a great degree the surface -decoration, and the carved mould- ings, and with them much of the symbolism of details ; but we are amply compensated by the greater developement of the sym- bolism of numbers. It is difficult to divest the prosecution of this branch of the subject of the appearance of trifling, in the eyes of those who do not know the degree in which the very greatest Fathers of the Church carried their mystical use and interpretation of numbers. To adduce a few examples would convey no adequate idea of this the truth is, that wherever numbers are mentioned in Holy Writ, there the Fathers found that they had a mystical, as well as an historic meaning : and we are bold to say that the Bible itself fully sanctions the prin- ciple of such interpretations, by the obviously mystic character which it gives to certain numbers, — as for instance, to three and to seven. From the writings of the Fathers, the like use of num- bers passed into the several branches of ecclesiastical art. We have already noted a triplicity of arrangements indicating the 1 We will give, however, one pas- sage from our own Venerable Bede, in which he adopts the principle on which a mystical interpretation is given to numbers. ' ' Isidore says, in his praises of numeration, that the hidden mean- ing (ratio) of numbers, is worthy of note, for there are many places of Holy Writ in which they evidently contain a great mystery, nor is it said in vain that God made all things by measure, number, and weight. The number six for instance, which is per- fect in its parts, expresses the perfec- tion of the world in the language of numbers : and so the forty days which Moses and Elias, and the Lord Him- self fasted, cannot be understood, without respect to the significancy of numbers. And there are other num- bers in Holy Writ whose meaning can- not be reached without the science of computation." — Beda de Computo. THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 187 doctrine of the Trinity : we find this now carried down to the parts of the fabric, especially to the windows, in which the num- ber three begins to prevail, especially at the east end, or the part where whatever is mystical most delights to dwell. We have also far more frequently, (and indeed it soon becomes all but universal,) the octagonal form for the font. 1 In the early Decorated, the geometric forms in the windows afford occasion to an almost indefinite use of the symbolism of numbers. We give a few examples from the Essay on Sacramentality, with the interpretations there suggested, but with some hesitation in ad- mitting the more recondite meanings. " The south transept of Chichester Cathedral is a glorious specimen of Decorated symbolism. In the gable is a Marygold, containing two inter- secting equilateral £n-angles : the six apices of these are sea?-foiled : the interior hexagon is beautifully worked in six leaves. The lower window seven lights : in the head is an equilateral spherical tri-angle, containing a large ^re-foil, intersected by a smaller tre-foil. Here we have the Holy Trinity, the Divine Attributes, the perfection of the Deity. " The next element introduced was the consideration of the six attri- butes of the Deity. One of the simplest examples was to be found in the west window of the north aisle of S. Nicolas, at Guildford : a plain circle, containing six ^re-foils : these are arranged in two tn-angles, each contain- ing three tre-foil s, and the two sets are varied. " The east end of Chichester is rather earlier, but introduces yet another element. Here we have a triplet : and at some height above it, a wheel- window of seven circles : symbolizing therefore eternity and perfection. " We are now in a purely Decorated age. And as one of its earliest windows we may mention that in the Bishop of Winchester's Palace at Southwark. It was a wheel and contained two intersecting equilateral tri- angles : around them were six sex-foiled triangles, the hexagon in the cen- tre containing a star of six great and six smaller rays. Here of course, [!] the Blessed Trinity and the Divine and Human Natures were set forth. " The east window of Bristol Cathedral is of seven lights, but so much prominence is given to the three central ones, as strongly to set forth the Most Holy Trinity : over them is a crown of six leaves and by the numerous winged foliations around them, the Heavenly Hierarchy may, very probably, be understood." 2 1 Essay on Sacramentality, pp. lxlii. et seq. 2 This form is symbolical, accord- ing to the ancient method of spiritu- alizing numbers, of the new birth in Baptism : for the seven days' creation of the natural world is symbolized by the number seven ; and the new crea- tion by Christ Jesus, by the number eight, in allusion to the eighth day, on which He rose again from the dead. And this reason S. Ambrose, more than 188 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. After this time, as the authors now quoted justly observe, there was no addition made to the structure, and but little to the vocabulary of the language of symbols ; but we may close this chapter with an instance in which the voice of after ages has consecrated a beautiful character of Gothic architecture, into the symbolical expression of certain glorious characteristics of the Christian faith and people, by which it was unconsciously developed. Struck by its peculiar character, Coleridge calls a Gothic church " the petrifaction of our religion," and the same pos- sessor of many gifts compares Pagan and Gothic architecture in such terms as these : " The Greek art is beautiful. When I enter a Greek church, my eye is charmed, and my mind elated : I feel exalted and proud that I am a man. But the Gothic art is sublime. On entering a cathedral, I am filled with devotion and with awe ; I am lost to the actualities that surround me, and my whole being expands into the infinite ; earth and air, nature and art, all swell up into eternity, and the only sensible impression left is, that I am nothing " Y That character which has called forth such testimonies may well be admitted among the recognized symbolisms of church architecture : and to descend to particular features, the taper spire " that points to heaven," cannot be without its recognized meaning, since it has inspired Wordsworth to say that spires " point as with silent finger to the sky and stars, and some- times, when they reflect the brazen light of a rich, though rainy sunset, appear like a pyramid of flame burning heavenward and to sing } " Watching, with upturned eye, the tall tower grow, And mount, at every step, with living wiles Instinct — to rouse the heart and lead the will, By a bright ladder to the world above." fourteen centuries ago, assigned for the octagonal form of the Baptistery : " Octachorura sanctos templum sur- rexit in usus, Octagonus fons est, munere dignus eo, Hoc numero decuit sacri baptismatis aulam Surgere, quo populis vera salus rediit Luce resurgentis Christi, qui claustra resolvit Mortis, et a tumulis suscitet ex- amines." 1 Literary Remains of S. T. Cole- ridge, i. 71. THE SYMBOLISM OF ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE. 189 Such developements of the awfulness and verticality of Gothic art are now no longer without a soul of symbolical meaning : they have shot forth into holy life, like the budding rod of Aaron, which was ever after religiously preserved in the ark of the Covenant, as a testimony. 190 CHAPTER X. The Round Churches in England. General History of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre at Jeru- salem. — S. Sepulchre's, Cambridge : — S. Sepulchre's, Northamp- ton. — The Temple. — Little Maplested. Both from their date and from their importance as instances of symbolical arrangements, an account of the round churches in England ought to follow the two last chapters. Of these memorials of the sufferings and achievements of pilgrims, and of a religious chivalry in the Holy Land, four still remain in England : the church of the Holy Sepulchre in Cam- bridge, the church of the same name and dedication at North- ampton, the Temple church in London, and the church of Little Maplested in Essex, and to these perhaps may be added the chapel in the castle of Ludlow. From the time of our Saviour's Ascension, and of the de- scent of the Holy Ghost at Pentecost, the city of Jerusalem contained its Christian Church ; and its succession of bishops, with whatever else is essential to the well-being of a Church, was never interrupted, except during the short, though cruel inter- vals of siege and persecution, to which Jerusalem has been so frequently subjected. Nor were the sacred places of which the mother of all Churches could boast interesting to her more im- mediate children only. From all parts of Christendom pilgrims came to worship at the Holy Sepulchre, and in many other places within and around the Holy City, consecrated by our Saviour's presence. That the immediate disciples of our Lord should forget the spots so hallowed to their affections, would be impossible ; and almost equally so, that they should neglect to point them out to their children, and their children's children. Among these, none received greater regard than the place of THE ROUND CHURCHES IN ENGLAND. 191 our Lord's burial ; and in this instance, the heathens, in their determination to rob the Christians of their spiritual title in the sacred spot, unwittingly assisted in perpetuating its remem- brance. A temple of Venus was built over the Holy Sepulchre, and it was thenceforth a matter of history, no longer subjected to the less tangible evidence of tradition, that on that spot the tomb of our Saviour was to be found. The piety of Constantine the first Christian emperor, and of his mother Helena, hastened, so soon as it was in their power, to cleanse the sacred spot from this pollution, and to crown the Holy Mount with a better temple, open to the devout worship- pers of Jesus Christ. The temple of Venus was destroyed ; the ground was cleared ; the Holy Sepulchre was found unde- stroyed, beneath many feet of soil, and soon a beautiful church was erected over it. This church, called the Church of the Resurrection, was circular, enshrining the Holy Sepulchre around which it was built ; and from this circular form of Con- stantine's Church of the Resurrection, the round churches of which we are about to speak were imitated. But the munificence of Constantine did not cease here. The death of our Lord, as well as His resurrection, was to be com- memorated j and eastward of the round church already men- tioned, but connected with it by a court open to the heavens, and surrounded by a corridor, he built a much larger church, called the Martyrium ; and of this also we shall find a counterpart in the four round churches in England. The Church of the Resurrection, however, after having been visited by pilgrims for three centuries, was destroyed by fire at the sacking of Jerusalem by Cosroes II. The emperor Herac- lius rescued the holy city from the Persians ; and though it fell soon after into the hands of the Arabian followers of Mahomet, the resort of Christians to the Holy Sepulchre can scarcely be said to have been checked by the Moslem lords of Jerusalem. The Khalif Harun el Rashid even sent to Charlemagne the keys of the church, in token of the free admission which he granted to the Christians, " to that sacred and salutary place. - " But the rule of the Egyptians was more adverse to Christian pilgrims. By the orders of Hakem, who commenced his reign in 996, the Church of the Resurrection was utterly destroyed, 192 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. and even the cave itself was preserved only by the natural in- destructibility of its materials. The church was again rebuilt by the patriarch Nicephorus, with funds from the imperial treasury of Constantine Monomachus ; but the Christians still groaned under heavy burdens, which were rather increased than lightened when the Holy City again changed masters, and fell under the despotic rule of the Turks. Such was the state of the Christians until the voice of Peter the Hermit, at the very end of the eleventh century, aroused all Europe to the defence of pilgrims to the Holy Sepulchre, and to the recovery of the Holy City from the hands of infidels. The church which the first crusaders found, was not, there- fore, the same which Constantine the Great had erected, though on the same spot, and probably very much on the same plan ; that is, there was a circle, or perhaps a double circle of columns, with their outer wall, surrounding the sacred cave ; and east- ward of this, the larger Church of the Martyrdom, connected with the Church of the Resurrection, by an uncovered court. Within these were many spots consecrated by various parts of our Saviour's sufferings or triumph. And this is all that we shall require by way of comparison with the English churches which we are about to describe ; nor need we more than glance at the fact, that the present church, re-edified since its almost total destruction by fire in the beginning of this century, still presents evidences in its architectural features, of the work of the pilgrim Christians of the twelfth century, in the enlarge- ment and adornment of the sacred edifice. We may well believe that the Christians who returned from their devout pilgrimage would gladly erect memorials in their own country, of the glorious and spirit-stirring sights of the Holy City ; and this natural wish was expressed in the erection of churches, in some degree at least similar to that of the Resur- rection. Of these, three have perished; Temple-Bruer, and Aislabey, in Lincolnshire, and the Old Temple in Holborn. Four yet remain, the first of which in order of time, and not the last in beauty, is The Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Cambridge. The ancient and round portion of this church consists of an outer circular wall, with a rich Norman doorway, opening into THE ROUND CHURCHES IN ENGLAND. 193 an aisle, which embraces a central round, resting on eight circu- lar piers, and finished above with a clerestory, surrounded by an arcade, pierced with eight lights, and finished with a conical roof. The piers are low and massive, without bases, and with capitals of varied designs. The arches are all circular, and some of them adorned with the zigzag moulding, so characteristic of the Norman style. To this part of the church is added a chancel, and two aisles, of Perpendicular character, with an octangular bell-turret at the north-west angle of the north aisle ; and thus the present church consists of a circular nave and aisle, with the chancel and its north and south aisle and bell-turret, extending eastward from the round. In the interior the effect is greatly heightened by the introduction of rich painted glass, and an ap- propriate style of furniture and decoration throughout. The round is, of course, the part of most interest, and here the win- dows bear, many of them, reference to the history of the Church. One represents the Resurrection, with an obvious allu- sion to the Church of the Resurrection, after which, as we have stated, this church is designed. Another is of the Venerable Bede, the great historian of our early Church, who is said, (but on the authority of a tradition which will not bear minute can- vassing,) to have resided for a time between the site of S. Sepul- chre, and that of S. John's College; and who happens to be the only person who has handed down to these times a description of the round churches existing in Jerusalem 1 in his day* Another window represents S. Etheldreda, whose history is con- nected with Ely, in which diocese the church is situated. The 1 Bede's account of the holy places Helen. From hence, to the westward, in Jerusalem, abridged from Adam- appears the church of Golgotha, in man, who had it from Arculf, a French which is also to be seen the rock Bishop, who had himself visited the which once bore the Cross, with our holy city. Saviour's body fixed on it, and now " Entering the city of Jerusalem on it bears a large silver cross, with a the north side, the first place to be great brazen wheel hanging over it visited, according to the disposition of surrounded with lamps. Under the the streets, is the Church of Constan- place of our Lord's Cross a vault is tine, called the Martyrdom. It was hewn out of the rock, in which sacri- built by the Emperor Constantine, in fice is offered on an altar for honour- a royal and magnificent manner, on ac- able persons deceased, their bodies re- count of the Cross of our Lord hav- maining meanwhile in the street. To ing been found there by his mother the westward of this is the Anastasis, 194 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. east window of the chancel, which appears to great advantage on immediately entering the church, is of beautiful painted glass, representing the Crucifixion, with the figures of the ever blessed Virgin, and the beloved Apostle, as they are associated with the cross of Christ in mediaeval art, on the authority of the Holy Gospel. This is a cursory description of the church as it now appears, after having been restored with great taste, and at a vast expense, by the Cambridge Camden Society. It is greatly to be regretted that a question very indirectly touching architectural proprieties should have occurred to take the work out of the Society's hands ; and no one can approve of the taste and judgment dis- played in the few alterations which have been made since they resigned their task of restoration. Into the polemical question of course we do not enter. The appearance of S. Sepulchre, before a fall of part of the round admitted the care of the Society in its restoration, was quite as indicative of the bad taste of comparatively recent generations, as of the piety and genius of the Crusaders. The round had been deformed by the inser- tion of most incongruous windows, both below and in the clere- story ; while the latter had been made to bear the additional weight of another story, which was finished in all its details in that is, the round church of our Sa- viour's resurrection, encompassed with three walls, and supported by- twelve columns. Between each of the walls is a broad space, containing three altars, at three different points of the middle wall ; to the north, the south, and the west, it has eight doors or en- trances, through the three opposite walls : four whereof front to the north- east, and four to the south-east. In the midst of it is the round tomb of our Lord, cut out of the rock, the top of which a man standing within can touch : the entrance is on the east : against it is laid the great stone, which to this day bears the marks of the iron tools within, but on the outside it is all covered with marble, to the very top of the roof, which is adorned with gold, and bears a large golden cross. In the north part of the monument, the tomb of our Lord is hewn out of the same rock, seven feet in length, and three palms above the floor ; the en- trance being on the south side, wher twelve lamps burn day and night, four within the sepulchre, and eight above, on the right hand side. The stone that was laid on the entrance of the monument is now cleft in two ; never- theless the lesser part of it stands as a square altar before the door of the monument ; the greater part makes another square altar at the east end of the same church, and is covered with linen cloths. The colour of the said monument and sepulchre appears to be white and red." — Eccl. Hist. v. 16. THE ROUND CHURCHES IN ENGLAND. 195 a late Perpendicular character. The chancel and north aisle were altogether unworthy of the fabric to which they were appended. We have described this church before adverting to its history, because, as usual, the architectural character is as valuable in as- certaining its date and destination as any existing records. The character of the round takes us back to the very beginning of the twelfth century, or rather, to the last few years of the eleventh ; and it appears from a MS. in the Bodleian Library that it was consecrated in 1101. For the rest, we know nothing, except what its form and its dedication tell us. It was certainly erected by some one interested in, or connected with the Crusades, and, most probably, that prayers might be offered in it for the success of those religious expeditions. But it cannot owe its erection to the Templars, who did not exist till 1118, and who did not obtain possessions in England until 1134. S. Sepulchre's, Northampton, is the next in antiquity, but so far as regards its most ancient portion, and that which en- titles it to a place in the present chapter, it is far inferior to the former. Its erection is referred with some degree of probability to Simon S Liz, second Earl of Northampton, and a Crusader, who died a.d. 1127. In size it much surpasses the Cambridge church of the same name, but in architectural beauty it is at least as much its inferior. Like that, it consists of a central portion, supported by eight Norman circular pillars ; but the arches are pointed, though the plain flat soffits are far less ele- gant than the well-moulded semicircles of the older structure. The present roof, both to the round and to the outer portion, is of wood ; and, as there are no vaulting shafts, or other indica- tions of a better covering, it is probable that it was always so. The central portion becomes octagonal immediately above the piers. Of course the original buttresses and windows through- out, are the shallow square buttresses, and narrow round-headed lights of the Norman period; but later windows are inserted everywhere ; and walls of great thickness, and of a shape as little liable to disturbance as any, have been so shaken in the process, that the far-projecting buttresses of later styles have been rendered necessary. The present porch is to the south, and at the north is an ancient doorway, now blocked up. If there was ever a west porch, its place is occupied by a beautiful o 2 196 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. tower and spire, of which the composition cannot be too much commended. It is early Perpendicular in character; the far- projecting diagonal corner buttresses of the tower bring down the line of the spire to the ground with great effect. The chan- cel and its two aisles, opening out of the round eastward, do not in their present state, harmonize at all with the round ; although the piers and arches between the chancel and the north aisle are of so early a character, that they form doubtless a part of the original plan, though not erected until the Early English style had assumed its distinct character. The external aspect of these parts of the church would lead us to assign the north aisle to the close of the thirteenth century, the south aisle to the middle of the next, and the chancel to the fifteenth century ; but more minute inspection shows that they have been rather altered than erected at those periods. In the interior of the chancel are some curious corbels supporting the roof, representing grotesques playing on musical instruments ; among others, the organ, the fiddle, the fife, and the double drum ; but there is little worthy of remark in this portion of the fabric. We cannot leave this church without expressing very sore regret, that it does not find some sympathy in its extreme destitution from the inhabitants of the wealthy town in which it is situated. Even in its present condition, it is one of the most interesting objects in the neighbourhood, and this it can never cease to be ; but it is also one of the most melancholy objects, which it need not remain, nor can remain long, without becoming a reproach to the town. The two churches already described cannot, with absolute cer- tainty, be assigned to their proper founders; only their very name, as well as what would, on any other hypothesis, be the mere accident of their form, connects them with the devotions of pilgrims to the original Hound Church of the Resurrection. But the Temple Church, London, and the church of Little Maplested, are more closely associated with the two great religi- ous orders of chivalry, the Templars and the Hospitalers, who were bound by the most solemn vows to the defence of pilgrims to Jerusalem. The Templars had already a church in Old- bourne, now Holborn, before the erection of the present church was commenced ; and the latter, when finished, was called the THE ROUND CHURCHES IN ENGLAND. 197 " New Temple/' with reference to the more ancient foundation. The older edifice, like this, was round, and though not, in all probability, so sumptuous, had yet been built at great cost ; for it was of Caen stone, as appeared when some of its remains were discovered at the beginning of the last century. The pre- sent church consists of a circular portion, and, eastward of this, of a chancel, with its two aisles, answering in relative position to the martyrium, connected with the Church of the Resurrection, as built by Constantine, and perpetuated through all its changes to the present day. The round, then called the New Temple, was consecrated in 1185 by Heraclius, Patriarch of Jerusalem, on his arrival in England to obtain succour from Henry II. against Saladin — an event still commemorated by an inscrip- tion over the door leading to the cloisters, of which the follow- ing is a translation : — " On the 10th of February, in the year from the incarnation of our lord 1185, this Church was Consecrated in honour of the Blessed Mary, by the Lord Heraclius, by the grace of God Patriarch of the Church of the Resurrection, who has remitted sixty days of enjoined penance to all who visit it annually." Whether this inscription was of the date of the church cannot be determined, for it was destroyed by the workmen employed in repairs after a fire by which it had been much injured, in 1695 ; but there can be no question that it rightly records the event of the dedication. The oblong por- tion of this church was consecrated on Ascension Day, 1240 ; and in this, as in the former case, the architectural features fully answer to the historical mention of the event. 1 The church is entered at the west by an elaborate Norman doorway, which formerly communicated with a cloister leading from the hall of the Knights Templars. The round, as in all 1 Like the church of S. Sepulchre, in Cambridge, the Temple Church has been recently restored ; but it is the highest praise of those who planned and executed the restoration, that it may still, in all essential features, be described according to the ancient ap- pearance. We have, indeed, made a great advance in good taste and good feeling, when a learned body, but of a secular profession, have devoted up- wards of ,£50,000 to the legitimate restoration of a sacred edifice, which they have inherited from an age and order full of high and holy associa- tions, and perfect in its style of eccle- siastical art. 198 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. other cases of the like kind, consists of a circle of columns, supporting a tower, and of an external circular wall, forming a kind of aisle to the central portion. In this instance the piers are six in number, each consisting of four columns springing from the same base, and again joined at the capitals, but disen- gaged through the whole height of the shafts, except where a fillet connects them at their mid-height. From these columns spring pointed arches, over which runs a triforium, behind an arcade of semicircular and intersecting arches ; and over these again are six clerestory windows of the pure Norman character. The roof is groined, the ribs springing from vaulting shafts which rise from the capitals of the several pillars. The outer round is also vaulted, and lighted by Norman circular-headed windows. Over the west door is a wheel- window of eight lights. The lower portion of the wall is relieved by shafts springing from a stone bench which is carried along the whole circum- ference, and supporting an arcade of pointed arches, the span- drils of which are decorated with grotesque heads. Although this part of the church agrees perfectly with its Norman date, an eye practised in distinguishing architectural features will at once detect intimations of the approach of the next style, especially in the pointed arcade and pier arches, and in the banding of the shafts. The square portion of the church, which opens into the round by three lofty pointed arches, is of pure and highly developed Early English. The pillars, which are of a very elegant section, are light and lofty. The roofs are all groined. The windows are triple lancets throughout. More minute features it would be impossible to notice in so hasty a sketch. The richness of the whole structure is in some respect due to the materials, as well as to the beauty of the design. The shafts throughout, both the greater shafts supporting the roof, and those purely ornamental in the arcades, are of Purbeck marble. The floor was of encaustic tiles, and has been restored after the same fashion. The roof was gorgeously painted, and it has been adorned once more with an equal profusion of colours. The windows were of stained glass, and they are again filled with the same gorgeous material; and in these, and the painting of the roof, both executed by Mr. Willement, (to whom the art of painting THE ROUND CHURCHES IN ENGLAND. 199 in glass owes so much,) great attention is paid to the suitable- ness of decoration, as regards both age and subject : the insig- nia of the Templars appearing everywhere in various forms, together with such theological emblems and devices as were com- monly used at the time to which the erection of the church is referred. Although beautiful in themselves, perhaps the benches, in their design and arrangement, reflect less credit on the learned restorers of this ancient edifice than any other part. But every praise does not fall to the lot of one generation, and to be first in action, and to profit by the experience of others, are incompatible. The Church of Little Maplested is dedicated to S. John of Jerusalem, the Patron Saint of the Hospitalers, to whom it owes its erection. In 1186 the whole parish was given to this chivalrous order by Juliana, daughter and heir of Robert Dor- nelli, and wife of William Fitz Andelin, steward to Henry II. Here therefore, a commandery was erected. The church, still remaining, carries us back to the times at which the knights flourished in wealth, reputation, and true greatness. In size this church is inferior to either of the other three ; but it is even more remarkable in some respects ; for the whole, with the exception of the porch, is of the original design and execution ; and the chancel with its semicircular apse still more closely resembles the Church of the Martyrium, so often before alluded to, than the same relative portions of the churches be- fore mentioned. Of the commandery, once a part of the same Christian estab- lishment, not a vestige remains ; but the Knights of S. John of Jerusalem, if they retained their religious character, would not be the last to submit, cheerfully, to the decree of Providence, which has preserved the memorials of their faith to future ages, while the signs of their power and splendour are utterly swept away. 200 CHAPTER XI. The Connection of Heraldry with Ecclesiastical Architecture. Synchronisms and parallel fate of Heraldry and Gothic Archi- tecture. — Augmentations illustrated from several events. — Dates of Buildings determined by Heraldry. — Architectural charges, especially the chevron. heraldic decorations of Buildings. — Community of feeling between Heraldry and Christian Art : The Religious element in both. To the Crusaders Christian Architecture owed the round churches, and Christian chivalry owed heraldic insignia and this last architecture also borrowed as a minor decoration. The existence of some connection between Gothic architecture and heraldry is sufficiently obvious to the most superficial ob- server, from the fact that armorial bearings are among the fre- quent and characteristic decorations of the ecclesiastical and other buildings of the middle ages. But this fact cannot be without its causes, results, and inferences : and, in truth, archi- tecture and heraldry are linked together by ties of greater im- portance than mere accidents of detail and decoration. For instance, heraldic records often throw light on architectural questions, where all other sources of information fail : and the 1 " One ornament, which by degrees formed a very considerable feature among those of the pointed style, was derived clearly and notoriously from the Crusades alone ; namely, armorial bearings. When these insignia, in- vented in the holy wars, and placed on tne shields and helmets of the leaders, in order that they might be recognized by their followers in life and in death, had been rendered illustrious by the feats and heroism of their wearers, and had become proofs of an honourable pedigree in their descendants, their successors, no longer satisfied with hanging them in reality or in effigy in their halls and habitations, displayed them round their tombs and funeral chapels : and the temple of the God of peace became studded with the monu- ments, not only of the private feuds of the Clergy, but of the public warfare of the laity." — Hope. CONNECTION OF HERALDRY WITH ARCHITECTURE. 201 eeclesiologist amply repays the debt thus contracted, when his researches bring to light armorial combinations of authority sufficient to settle a pedigree, and even to influence the descent of a title or of an estate. And this, perhaps, is all the connection that the practical man, as a matter-of-fact character delights to call himself, will desire to find ; and all that most men who have studied either of them alone, will expect to find between two sciences, not at first sight mutually dependent on each other. But there is, to say the least, a remarkable parallelism in the histories of architecture and of heraldry. Armorial bearings were brought into Europe by the Crusaders. At that very time ecclesiastical architecture, in the hands of the freemasons, was emerging from the Norman, and acquiring the Gothic type ; and this more fascinating style was brought to its highest perfection while our chivalrous con- nection with the Holy City still remained. Nor are the twin sciences less nearly associated in their decline, than in their birth and progress. It is true that neither heraldry nor archi- tecture was wholly deserted by its spirit, with the last efforts of the Crusaders : but architecture soon commenced its downward course, and heraldry, when chivalry had lost its highest and most inspiring direction, became comparatively effete. With mock chivalry came the greatest gorgeousness of blazonry : — the Field of the cloth of gold. With the Tudor race, (under which chivalry, and of necessity heraldry with it, visibly de- clined,) came also the decline of architecture ; marked not by defect, but, as in chivalry, by excess of gorgeousness, but with- out the spirit with which it was for a long while instinct. Since that time the fall of both has been consummated. What Gothic architecture was years ago who shall venture to express ? and as for heraldry, it almost ceased to exist, except as a source of revenue. It is, to say the least, a curious application of the system of rewards, to exact a fine from a faithful servant and his descendants, because of the value of his services ; and this the State has done in taxing the outward insignia of hard-earned glory, the memorials of honourable service. The blood that flowed at Cressy, at Agincourt, or at Waterloo, might surely purchase a right to transmit the coat there assigned untaxed to countless generations: and the good Lord James of Douglas 202 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. earned dearly enough for himself and his posterity the crowned heart which graces the Douglas shield. Where heraldic devices are merely taken, or "found" by a seal engraver, or purchased at the herald's office, let them be taxed doubly and trebly if ne- cessary : but surely there might be an exception in favour of those whose hatchment (whose atchievment, as the word is origi- nally and most significantly written) represents ancestral dignity, or who trace their paternal coat to a grant for services, or whose arms have ever received an honourable augmentation. Hitherto I have only stated the general synchronism of he- raldry and architecture in their rise, growth, decline, I may almost add disgrace. But there was a more especial parallelism in their mediaeval course, a resemblance in their forms and spirit, as well as in their fortunes. The shield takes the form of the arch most in use at the same period. With the Early English lancet, and the Decorated equilateral arch, we have the shield also acutely pointed. In the fifteenth century the arch and the shield become obtuse, with great loss of beauty to each : and in the sixteenth century we have the flat four-centred arch, and the shield, 1 requiring sundry quirks, and other appendages to give them form and character. In still later times we have all forms that an unbridled fancy can suggest, for shields and arches alike. In both cases, the deterioration lay deeper than any external forms. The language of heraldry was rapidly losing its flexi- bility and purity, and was becoming vulgar and common-place. Armorial bearings were pictorial rather than symbolic; the painted history of the barbarous Mexicans, rather than the sacred and mystic hieroglyphic of sacerdotal Egypt. The aug- mentations which commemorate two actions, in some respects similar, but with an interval of three hundred years between them, will illustrate my meaning. In 1329 died Robert Bruce, king of Scotland, leaving unfulfilled a vow to go in person to the Holy Land. On his death-bed he entreated James of Douglas to carry his heart thither, a mission which his trusty friend and companion in arms died in attempting : but the 1 Or perhaps it would be still more fall of heraldry, to say that the shield true and still more indicative of the was disused and the coat substituted. CONNECTION OF HERALDRY WITH ARCHITECTURE. 203 Douglas still bears, in addition to the paternal coat, a man's heart proper, royally crowned or. How simple is this device ! In 1650, (that is more than three centuries after,) James Graham, Marquis of Montrose, was barbarously murdered by the traitors of Scotland, and his head fixed on a pike at the Tol- booth. It was removed by a retainer of the Marquis named Graeme ; a service to the dead thus commemorated in the crest of his descendants, " Two arms erect, issuing from clouds, in the act of removing from a spike a human skull : above the skull a Marquis's coronet, all between two laurel branches proper with the motto — ' Sepulto viresco.' " The description of this crest is as long as the history of the deed which it commemorates, and one cannot look at the cumbrous medley of head, coronet, arms, spikes, clouds, scrolls, and mottoes, without feeling that the herald's art had fallen far beneath the worthy deed which it had to celebrate. The language thus deteriorated soon utterly perished, and when architects did not, (but ought to have done) write on their buildings or on parts of them, " This is a church, this is the chancel, this is the tower heralds actually did confess that they had lost all power of expression in the language of heraldry, by writing under their pictures what they intended them to represent. On our later augmentations we have the names of places under certain green mounds, with castles upon them, and the like devices, which mean anything the letters please, because they mean nothing without the letters : and thus heraldry, which is a glorious hieroglyphic, a symbolical language, more universal than any tongue, Latin not excepted, is made to accept the help of a modern language most limited and most unideal. There is a very curious seal ring figured in the fourth volume of the " Archseologia," which so fully illustrates the theory and use of augmentations, that I am tempted to describe it at length. The device is a knight armed cap-a-pie, his shield blazoned or, a fess cheeky argent and azure, (the arms of Stuart,) 1 striking with a ragged staff at a lion, which has attacked him, and broken his sword which lies in two pieces at his feet. From the upper 1 The fess cheeky is a canting ordinary in this case, referring to the Steward's accounts. 204 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. part of the seal an arm is issuing, vested in a maunch, charged with three fleurs-de-lys, and holding a shield with the same arms before given, but with the augmentation of a lion rampant gules debruised by a bend ragule or, an escutcheon of pretence argent. The whole is surrounded by a double tressure, flori counter- flori. The knight here represented is probably Alexander Stuart, to whom the augmentation was assigned by Charles VI. of France, for service done by Andrew Stewart, his father, to the said Charles, and to the King of Scots ; and also to John the French King, grandfather to Charles. It is wholly unknown what the services were which are thus requited, but the seal, as a work of art, tells its own history in its own way ; the shield tells the same history in the language of heraldry. The combat of the knight has been with danger to his life, and the loss of his sword, but he seizes a ragged staff, and therewith debruises the lion, and receives from the French King, signified by the three fleurs-de-lys on the maunch, his own shield augmented by a lion debruised by a bend ragule, or a ragged staff, in bend. The only question is, whether the combat with the lion is real or allegori- cal. It would seem a more worthy exploit to conquer some hos- tile knight, than to kill a lion as thus represented ; and this may have been the service performed, the vanquished knight bearing a lion rampant. But if this were the case, the seal would con- tain a mixture of allegory and direct representation hardly ad- missible. The Stuart is a man, and so should the other be, if he were really a human opponent, bearing like the Stuart his arms on his shield. Again, if the lion represented any person or people, it would itself have been charged with some device. The lion therefore seems to be as real and literal as the knight and the combat; and the augmentation records the slaughter of a lion by Sir Andrew Stuart, after a sharp conflict, in which he had lost his sword. Now what I would chiefly remark here is this, — that if this were a modern augmentation, the allegory, which is not out of place on the seal, would in all probability have been the coat of arms awarded as an augmentation, while some vapid inscription by way of motto laboured to bring together history, allegory, and heraldry. As it is, the augmentation speaks purely in the CONNECTION OF HERALDRY WITH ARCHITECTURE. 205 language of heraldry, while the seal speaks in the supplemental and partly explanatory language of picture history. The modern use of explanatory inscriptions by way of mottoes is the more observable in itself, and the more derogatory to he- raldry,, because armorial devices, in their very theory, exclude speech and writing, for which they are in some sort a substitute. The heraldic insignia of the knight of old were the best desig- nations of his person and property. Covered with mail, at a distance far beyond that at which his features could be recog- nised, (even if his visor were raised,) perhaps, too, approaching persons who have never seen him, the Warren was known by his shield (cheeky or and azure,) the Fitzwilliam by his em- broidered surcoat (lozenge argent and gules), or Lupus, TLarl of Chester, by his canting device, a wolfs head erased argent, in a field azure, — and so well did the device answer its purpose, that it was known all over Christendom, and recognised by the very page, whose master could neither write his own name, nor read another man's. Property was marked in the same way. Instead of putting his name and titles on a nice square panel over a doorway, the founder of a church or castle inserted his arms ; and these testified to all generations that a Beauchamp or a Vere had there first spread his banner, or there first offered of his substance to the Almighty. These, in the great scarcity of records, are invaluable to the ecclesiologist or mediaeval historian, and the deductions from them are full of interest. The exact date of a building is also indicated sometimes by a change in the device of the founder, or by the association of other arms with his paternal coat. Thus Richard Plantagenet, Earl of Lancaster, assumed in 1373, and retained until about 1399, the arms of the King of the Romans ; and his shield thus ensigned, appears on the upper part of the tower of Tickhill, in Yorkshire, infallibly deciding that the belfry was added to the tower, which is Early English, between those dates. The cinque- foil of the Astleys occurs in Crick Church, together with the fess and cross crosslets of the Beauchamps. 1 Here is a double 1 In this case the impaling is very lion supports a shield with the Beau- curiously managed. A lion supports a champ coat, and the tails of the lions shield with the Astley coat, another are intertwined. 206 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. help in assigning the date, for the Beauchamp coat was at one time gules, crusilly or, instead of gules, a fess between six cross crosslets or, so that the church must have been erected while the arms of Beauchamp were emblazoned in the latter way ; but we get still nearer to the date of this church, on a comparison of the pedigrees of the two families which supply the date of their connexion by marriage. In the case of Crick Church, the arms of Astley occur several times on the exterior, as well as in the case just mentioned, in the interior ; but the Beauchamp coat does not appear at all on the exterior, and only once in the interior, where it is associated with that of Astley. Hence we may infer that the chancel of Crick was nearly finished before Astley had a right to the im- palement of Beauchamp ; for, otherwise, so honourable an he- raldic ensign would certainly not have been omitted during the progress of the work. On the other hand, at Astley, in War- wickshire, a church afterwards built by the same Sir Thomas de Astley, who finished Crick Church about the time of his mar- riage, the arms of Astley and Beauchamp occur alternately throughout the whole of the original fabric, as we should natu- rally expect ; thus indicating not only that the two churches were built by the same person, but also that the one was just finished, and the other just begun at the time of his marriage. As this instance affords a valuable praxis in the connection of heraldry with architecture, we will sum up the purely heraldic inferences which we have drawn : — I. The chancel of Crick was erected during the time that the Beauchamps bore a fess between six crosslets, and not while they bore crusilly. II. It was erected by an Astley : and III. By an Astley who married a Beauchamp : but IV. It was not finished till just after their marriage. Whereas on the other hand, V. Astley church, in Warwickshire, was also erected by an Astley who married a Beauchamp, and who was entitled, during the whole of the course of its erection, to asso- ciate the Beauchamp coat with his own. And all these deductions are fully borne out by documen- CONNECTION OF HERALDRY WITH ARCHITECTURE. 207 tary evidence, and by the architectural character of the two churches. In like manner the impaling of a family coat with the arms of a corporation sole, 1 as for instance, those of Chichele with the See of Canterbury, at Higham-Ferrers, affords an exact indication of dates, where they are not otherwise determined. But I must leave this branch of the subject, not for want of material, for every district in the kingdom would furnish abun- dant examples, but merely for shortness' sake, I will now pro- ceed to mention some heraldic charge s, which seem to be directly borrowed from architecture. Besides certain architectural objects, such as castles, towers, arches, pillars, canopies, and churches, architecture has given several forms and bearings to heraldry. The Pile driven into the marshy soil to receive the arches of a bridge occurs with the same name in blazonry, and probably records the erection of some work in which this contrivance was needed. But one of the heraldic ordinaries is more especially connected with archi- tecture in the symbolic language of ancient heralds. The chevron, composed, as it were, of two rafters leaning against each other, represents the tectum, the roof of a house, and it is, " as the learned Nicholas Upton has it, one of those bearings which per carpentarios et domorum f adores olim portabantur :" 2 but it has also a more honourable signification, and adumbrates 1 While on this subject, I may note another method of appropriating the arms of a corporation to an individual : — the figure of the person himself, or his coat or rebus, being presented in the same seal or coat with the corpo- ration device. Archdeacon de Bokyng- ham's seal of office was " the Virgin and Child, with the ecclesiastic be- neath in the attitude of worship." Here the Virgin and Child is the de- vice of the office, the ecclesiastic is De Bokyngham himself, who thus appro- priates the seal to his own person ; just as a present archdeacon would ap- propriate it, impaling his coat with it. Again, in the seal of the chantry in Wimbourne Minster founded byThos. de Brembre, the arms of Brembre (Argent two [three ?] Annulets and a canton azure) is placed under the figure, where the kneeling ecclesiastic is found in the before cited instance, {Archaeological Journal, XII. 360,) and the seal of Bishop Grandisson, and that also of his college, has the Bishop's arms, (Paly of six argent and azure, on a bend gules three eaglets or) in the same relative position. 2 Such professional arms are not uncommon, and would soon grow from the assumption of an individual to the honourable bearings of a family. In the churchyard at Harleston, in North- amptonshire, (a place of quarries and masons.) we find an instance. The 208 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. under the form of a roof, by a figure common to most languages, as well as to that of heraldry, the house in the second intention of the word, the family and lineage. Let us take the arms of Danby as an instance, viz., Argent, three chevronelles in base interlaced sable, on a chief of the second three mullets of the first : a coat which is expressly said to record the erection of three great houses in one province by the founder of this family. 1 In return heraldry has given some forms and many decora- tions to architecture. Spandrils and panels are, of course, adapted to the shields they bear ; and the shields themselves sometimes form brackets, corbels, and label terminations : and the very word label expresses much the same form in he- raldry and in architecture ; the dripstone over a square window, (which alone is properly called a label,) being almost identical in tombstones of the Lumleys are headed with the coat on a chevron between three castles a pair of CGmpasses ex- tended. This is purely an architectu- ral device. Bishop Skirlaw, whose coat is found on so many eccle- siastical buildings, bore six osier wands intertwined in the form of a cross, in allusion as has been sup- posed to the trade of a basket maker, which his father is said to have ex- ercised : but I should rather suspect that in this case the supposed trade is inferred from the arms, rather than the arms adopted from the trade. They would look another way blazoned as they might be, three pallets, and three barrulets intertwined. 1 "The three chevronels brased, shows that the ancestours of thys cote hath buildeth three great houses in one province, as we are told by the author of the first book of heraldry that was ever printed in the English tongue." Gerard Legh, in his "Ac- cedence of Armory," printed 1562, p. 180, quoted from the Ducatus Leodi- ensis. In the Glossary of Heraldry two varieties of a peculiar way of bearing the chevron, are given, which very exactly represent a groined or arched roof beneath the wooden roof, and both belong to names bearing reference to architectural construction. Argent a chevron inarched sable, for Hol- bearne (quasi Hall-beam,') and purpure a chevron inarched argent, for Arch- ever. William of Wykeham bore argent two chevronelles sable, between three roses gules, barbed and sided proper. 11 He probably assumed the chevronelles," says the Glossary, "in allusion to his employment as an ar- chitect." Had not the two chevron- elles some allusion to his two founda- tions at Winchester and at Oxford ? Or did he bear the same coat before they were contemplated ? It may be added that Archbishop Chichele, who succeeded Wykeham, as the freemasons have it, as their grand master in England, and who certainly displayed a kindred taste and skill in architec- ture, also bore a chevron in his coat, which was argent a chevron between three cinquefoils gules. CONNECTION OF HERALDRY WITH ARCHITECTURE. 209 form with the label in blazonry, used as the first mark of cadency. To recount the places on which arms are found in Gothic ar- chitecture would be endless : on exteriors, on towers and gate- ways, and porches innumerable ; in interiors, on the floor, and on the roof ; on capitals of pillars, and on spandrils of arches ; on the font and on the tomb, in short every where : but the most remarkable application of heraldry I know, is on the Easter sepulchre at Patrington, in Yorkshire, where the Roman soldiers who guard the sepulchre are represented with shields, charged with armorial bearings : certain Christian benefactors to the church thus identifying themselves, (but certainly not designedly,) with these enemies of our Divine Redeemer. In one instance, (I know of one only,) a particular bearing has given a form to an essential part of a structure. The win- dows of the south aisle of Crick church, to which I have already alluded at some length, have in their head a cinquefoil, — not an architectural but an heraldic cinquefoil, formed by the intersec- tions of the tracery. Now the cinquefoil is the coat of the Astleys, one of which family erected, or at least greatly altered, that part of the church, which thus takes its character from his shield. I shall not enter on the use of armorial bearings in windows of painted glass, and on encaustic tiles. I have still to observe on a certain community of feeling be- tween heraldry and Gothic architecture. They are both full of symbolical meaning, 1 and the symbols are in both cases purely symbols, not pictures or resemblances. In many cases they are the same in both. The cross, the symbol of our Redemption, which appears in so many forms in architecture, appears in still more in heraldry. Where the symbols are not identical, they often represent the same thing. The cross of S. George, as we 1 " Heraldry is, in fact, the last remnant of the ancient symbolism, and a legitimate branch of Christian art ; the griffins and unicorns, fesses and chevrons, the very tinctures or co- lours, are all symbolical, — each has its mystic meaning, singly and in combi- nation, and thus every genuine old coat of arms preaches a lesson of chi- valric honour and Christian principle to those that inherit it, — truths little suspected now-a-days in our he- rald's offices." — Lord Lindsay on Christian Art, ii. 4P. 210 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. now call it, is the cross of the crusaders, Argent, a cross gules. The Maltese cross, the escallop, the palmer's staff, the Saracen's head, and other heraldic bearings, answer to the round churches of the ecclesiologist. Both heraldry and Gothic architecture delight in grotesques, in imaginary figures : wyverns, and griffins, and heraldic tigers, and antelopes 1 in the one case ; and in the other masks of strange and monstrous shapes, dragons and salamanders. But the great bond of union between heraldry and architec- ture was the religious element in each. In theory every knight was a faithful and devoted Christian : in theory every architect was a servant of the living God. The knight received his arms and his banner at the hands of the Church, after prayer and vigil : and the rules of his order, and his vow of chivalry, were full of religious requirements and promises. And the arms which he received from the Church, he desired at his last day to suspend over his monument^ in pious acknowledgment that he had received them from God, that he had kept then! unsullied by God's grace, and that he was permitted to offer them again to God, in thankfulness and honour. And so with the architect and his work. The church was an offering, in the heart and from the heart of all concerned, the founder, the architect, the artisans. I fear it is too much to hope that heraldry shall again be accounted a religious science, or its application so much as capable of receiving a soul of devotion : but I do hope that a day may come again, when it shall not only be acknowledged that a church is a holy place, but that the work of the ecclesiastical architect is a holy work. 1 These are all of them entirely arbi- trary in their forms ; and the tiger and antelope would puzzle a comparative anatomist as much as the griffin or wyvern. 211 CHAPTER XII. The Early English Period. Great Exertions of Church Builders in the Thirteenth Century. — The Temple. — Fountains, Kirkstall, Buildwas, Winchester, S. Alban's, Glasgow, Beaulieu, York, Skelton, Ely, Durham, Rochester, Beverley, Ripon, Southwell. — Ely: Bishop Ridal, and the introduction of Western Transepts ; — Eustachius and the Galilee ;— Btshop Norwold and the Presbytery. — Wells: BisHor Jocelin. — Salisbury: Bishop Poore. — Old and New Sarum compared. — Nine Altars of Durham. — Extreme East Transepts. — Westminster Abbey, — Characteristics of Early English. — Destruction of Churches by violence: Rochester, Norwich. Impelled as it were by the sense of a new faculty, (for to this the use of the pointed arch almost amounted,) the Churchmen of the close of the twelfth, and of the whole course of the thir- teenth century, put forth extraordinary energies in the erection of religious edifices, or in the enlarging and beautifying those which already existed. In some districts there is scarcely a parish-church which does not owe its earliest existing portion to this era, 1 and perhaps there is hardly a cathedral or a conventual church of the higher order in existence, which did not receive some great addition during the reign of the Early English style. Examples then crowd upon us, but we shall mention only some of the more remarkable. In the octagon of the Temple Church, London, dedicated, as we have already recorded, in 1185, we have the pointed arch, with many accessions of the Norman style ; and in the Abbeys of Fountains, Kirkstall, 2 and Buildwas, the same juxtaposition 1 Of course the foundation of such support pointed arches, and again over churches, in the ecclesiastical sense, is these is the clerestory of purely Nor- often much more ancient than any man character. For beautiful views of part of the existing fabric. Fountains and Kirkstall, see "The 2 At Kirkstall this is very rem arka- Monastic Remains of Yorkshire," and ble. The pillars in the nave are Nor- Sharpe's Architectural Parallels, man in all their characters. These »2 212 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. of contending forms appears. At Winchester we have the Lady chapel built by De Lucy; 1 at the very beginning of the thirteenth century ; and in S. Alban's Abbey the four western bays of the nave, and the west porch by Abbot John de Cella, between 1195 and 1214. 2 Of about the same date is the Cathedral of Glasgow, which I mention (notwithstanding a general determi- nation not to travel out of England for instances,) for its singu- lar excellence ; even Salisbury itself being scarcely a more valuable example of pure Early English. It was commenced by Bishop Jocelin, who was consecrated in 1175, and his tomb in the crypt is evidence of its having been completed by him. 3 This part of Glasgow yields in interest only to the crypt at Canter- bury. It is thus described by Hickman : — u The crypt under the choir and chapter-house is not equalled by any in the king- dom ; it is from the fall of the ground well lighted, and is an uncommonly rich specimen of Early English ; the piers and groining are of the most intricate character, the most beautiful design and excellent execution. The groins have rich bosses ; and the doors are much enriched with foliage and other orna- ments ; the piers have fine flowered capitals, much like some at York." 4 In 1204, King John founded and richly endowed the Abbey of Beaulieu in Hampshire, a foundation which is chiefly memo- rable in history for the privilege of sanctuary attached to it having been claimed by two remarkable persons ; the one illus- trious in her misfortunes, the other notorious for the greatness of his impudence. Margaret of Anjou, Queen of Henry VI., 1 " In 1202, according to the annals, Bishop Godfrey de Lucy instituted a fraternity for the reparation of the church of Winton, to last five whole years. And in the obituary of John of Exeter, we are told that Godfrey Lucy made the vault with the aisles from the altar of the Blessed Mary to the end of the church, where he was buried outside the chapel of the Bles- sed Virgin." — See Professor Willis's Architectural History of Winchester Cathedral. 2 In the triforium of this portion of S. Alban's, the spandrils formed by the two open lancets under one outer arch, are pierced with a quatrefoil ; — thus indicating a tendency towards tracery ; and in the porch is a trefoil arcade. 3 Glossary. 4 Glasgow Cathedral has been more perfectly illustrated than most churches of equal pretensions, by Collie in his " Plans, Elevations, Sections, Details, and Views of the Cathedral of Glas- gow." THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 213 took refuge there when, on returning from the Continent, she found her husband a prisoner, and the usurper Edward on the throne ; and thence Perkin Warbeck was drawn by the false promises of Henry VII., to suffer imprisonment in the Tower, and a traitor's death at Tyburn. 1 In 1227, the southern transept of York Minster, the oldest part of that magnificent church, 2 was commenced by Archbishop Walter Grey, to whom, with much probability, is referred the neighbouring little church of Skelton, 3 equal in its kind to the greater work of the munificent primate. We shall have occasion, by-and-bye, to mention the presbytery of Ely Cathedral erected by Bishop Norwold, (1236—1253,) and also the Chapel of the Nine Altars, commonly ascribed to Bishop Poore, translated from Salisbury to Durham in 1228. About 1240, William de Hoo, Prior of Rochester, built the crypt and the choir of that church, out of the proceeds of offer- ings at the shrine of S. William. 4 With many additions in sub- sequent styles, Beverley Minster is still on the whole an Early English church. The nave, including the very fine west front of Ripon, is in the same style, but there are no means of authenti- cating its date : it is probably within the first twenty years of the thirteenth century. The choir and aisles, with the eastern transept of Southwell Minster, are Early English additions to a Norman nave and transepts. But it is time to leave such desultory notices of churches for a more particular history and description of some remarkable examples. Ely Cathedral contains specimens of the highest perfection of the several modifications of the pointed style, from its first in- 1 By ecclesiologists the remains of the Abbey are perhaps chiefly remem- bered for a beautiful stone pulpit. This pulpit is approached by steps in the wall of the refectory, which still remains and is used as a parish church. See plans and sections accompanying " Some Account of Beaulieu Abbey, in the county of Hants, by Owen B. Carter, architect ; " published in Weale's Quarterly Papers. 2 That is, of those parts which form any portion of the general composi- tion, for the crypt is partly Saxon, and partly the work of Archbishop Thomas, at the close of the twelfth century. 3 See Churches of Yorkshire, No. III. 4 See Winkles' Cathedrals. 214 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. troduction, and before it had cast off the more ancient Norman accessories, to the introduction of tracery, whence the reign of the Geometric or Early Decorated is calculated. The great west front consisting of a lofty tower with two wings, or transepts, flanked by four turrets, 1 is among the earliest instances of the pointed or transition Norman : indeed, the round arch occurs in the lower parts of the whole design, while the arch is pointed but still enriched with the zigzag or chevron moulding, in the upper portions. The whole of this was the work of Bishop Bidal, between the years 1174 and 1189 ; nearly, that is, during the very same space which was occupied by William of Sens, and William the Englishman, in the restoration of Canterbury Cathedral, the history of which we have already related in treat- ing of the introduction of the pointed arch. Like all rich examples of the same date, which retain a general Norman character, this work of Bishop Ridal exempli- fies the very splendid effect of arcades as decorations of large surfaces ; and in the lantern, which had been from time imme- morial underdrawn, having lately been opened internally, we have another proof of the correctness and grandeur of concep- tion in our ancestors, and of their mastery in composition over the greatest masses, as well as over the most minute details. Bishop Bidal was, so far as I know, the first to design and execute a great western facade, separate, in some sense, from the original front of a cathedral, and wholly an addition to the nave and aisles. The grandeur of a Norman west front did not ex- tend beyond a high nave gable, flanked by low massive towers, which terminated the aisles. The great front of Ely substituted a lofty tower for the central gable, and two great wings, each with its two turrets for the ordinary towers. As it appears at present, with the addition of an octagon to the central tower, this, when seen from the west, which ought of course to be the most favourable view of a west facade, is somewhat deficient in harmony ; but from the site of the ancient infirmary, a little to the south-east of the south transept, where the intervention of 1 The north wing with its turrets octagon upon the tower, more than a fell, not long before the Reformation, century after the tower had been owing probably to the erection of an finished. THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 215 the nave-roof diminishes the relative height of the central tower, nothing can well surpass the happy combination of gran- deur and picturesqueness of this arrangement. The west facade of Peterborough/ in principle resembling that at Ely, though, greatly differing from it in composition, and which is generally considered the finest west front in the kingdom, has nothing to equal that at Ely, seen from the spot just mentioned. And let us, before we dismiss the western transeptal facade, observe the place which it may probably have had in the sym- bolism of church architecture. That the central cross repre- sented the Cross of Christ is beyond dispute ; and if it is not so certain, it is at least probable, that the eastern cross, or that yet above the great transept, or as it were over the head of the cross, as at Wells and York, and in a different form at Durham and Fountains, represented the inscription over our Blessed Saviour's head, in which, all unconsciously, yet by a Divine im- pulse, He was proclaimed a King ; or perhaps even the crown it- self of His mediatorial kingdom. And it remains that the western cross, or that before the nave, and through which ad- mission to the body of the church is gained, represented the steps on which the cross of Calvary stands, and by which it must be approached, mystically by us, as it was actually by our Divine Redeemer, if like Him we would through the cross ascend to a crown. Though Ely had now perhaps the finest approach in the king- dom, it did not satisfy Eustachius, who succeeded to the Episco- pate in 1197, and filled the throne till 1214. This prelate 1 The west front of Peterborough is usually attributed to Eobert de Lind- say, abbot from 1210 to 1222. While sacrist he had bestowed much care on the fabric, among other things making thirty glass windows, which before were stuffed with straw ; and many of the dependencies of the Abbey he en- riched in one way or other. There is however no mention of his works in the abbey-church after his elevation, and indeed it is one of the numerous and provoking inconsistencies of the monastic history, that slight things are so often mentioned, and very great works left unnoticed. However the style very well agrees with the time of Lindsay, and may be taken as a strong confirmation of the tradition which gives the work to an abbot whose cha- racter also justifies the choice. It may also be accounted a confirmation, that in 1237, (and the work though begun and carried on by Lindsay might well be so long in completion,) the church was solemnly rededicated. — Gunton's Peterborough, pp. 294—303. 216 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. erected the Galilee, a western porch of great size, and of splen- did design and execution, before the central door of Bishop Kidal's work. In this porch the Early English appears already fully developed. The triplet of lancets over the west door is the most characteristic feature, but throughout the details and deco- rations are very perfect and very distinctive of the style ; and especially the full power of cusping as a decoration is here de- veloped, and the use of foliage and the dog-tooth in the deep hollows of mouldings is very effective ; a style of ornament in which there is as great a change from the Norman in the prin- ciples of decoration, as there is in constructive principles in the pointed arch. In 1229, Hugh Nor wold 1 was consecrated Bishop of Ely. To this munificent prelate the cathedral owed the last addition which we shall mention in the present chapter. The choir as well as the nave and transepts, was, at the beginning of his Episcopate, of the original Norman, much shorter than the nave, as was universally the case with the earlier Norman conventual churches, and probably with a semicircular east end, as still in the neighbouring cathedrals of Peterborough and Norwich. But the veneration in which S. Etheldreda the patron saint was held, and the consequent devotions of the people, called for a more splendid shrine for her relics, and Bishop Nor wold de- stroyed the Norman apse, and extended the church eastward by six more arches. Nothing can exceed the beauty of this obla- tion on the altar of S. Etheldreda. The carving is of the most delicate kind, and the clusters of foliage in the several corbels, both in the exterior of the east end, and in the whole of the in- terior are exceedingly rich. The value of Purbeck marble also in the slender shafts by which the greater pillars are relieved, as well as in the vaulting and jamb-shafts, with all their enrich- ments, as contrasted with the stone-work (equally elaborate), of which the constructive portions are formed, is here admirably displayed. Bishop Norwold died in 1254, and was buried in the noble work which he lived to dedicate, in the presence of the King (Henry III.) and Prince Edward, afterwards Edward I., 1 Jocelin of Bath and Wells was one of the Bishops who assisted at the conse- cration of Norwold. THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 217 together with the Bishops of Norwich and LlandafF, and a great concourse of nobles. Bishop Jocelin of Wells, and Bishop Hugh of Lincoln, founded jointly the Hospital of S. John at Wells. Jocelin also founded several prebends in the church of Wells, and endowed all the dignities, persons, and offices attached to the church. But these works, great as they were, are not those for which he is here mentioned. He took down the church of W ills, which was in a most ruinous state, and rebuilt it from the ground, and dedicated it. He also built with great skill the chapels and lodges of Wells and of Woky The see of Wells had no such Bishop before him, nor as yet, says the historian, has he been followed by his like. At his death he was honourably buried in the middle of the choir of Wells. 1 Scanty as it is, this is all the notice that I find of the erection of one of the greatest glories of the thirteenth century ; and to this day, one of the greatest ornaments of the kingdom. In- deed the Cathedral of Wells, with its several parts and precincts, is perhaps more perfect than any other in existence ; and its plan still comprises all the features of a vast cathedral and con- ventual church. Not that all these are of the same date, or of the work of Jocelin : but the most striking feature of the whole is certainly to be referred to him, as well as, in all probability, the chapel in the palace, which is in its kind as perfect as the Cathedral itself. The west front of the Cathedral is not like those of Ely and Peterborough before mentioned, a separate por- tion of the cathedral, but it combines a unity of purpose which is wanting in those, with all their grandeur and importance : a result obtained by extending the towers as transepts beyond the north and south walls of the church instead of erecting them 1 " Isti duo Episcopi Jocelinus et Hugo Lincolniensis fundarunt Hospi- tale S. Johannis Wellensis. Jocelinus fundavit multas Prsebendas in Ecclesia Wellensi de novo, dotavit etiam omnes dignitates, personatus et officia dictse Eeclesise in forma adhuc durante : ipsamque Wellensem Ecclesiam vetus- tatis ruinis enormiter deformatam pro- stravit, et a pavimentis erexit dedi- cavitque Hie sibi similem anteriorem non habuit, nec hue usque visus est habere sequentem. Tandem defunctus, in medio Chori Wellise ho- norifice sepelitur Capellas etiam cum cameris de Welles et Woky notabiliter construxit." — Can.Wellen. de Ep. Bath, et Wellen. in Anglia Sacra, I. 564. 218 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. over the last bay of the aisles. The noble central space thus gained, together with the towers by which it is flanked, covered as they are with exquisite sculptures, present as happy a combi- nation of grandeur and beauty, as was ever realized by mortal hand. Common consent has given to Salisbury which was being- erected by Richard Poore and his successors during nearly the same time that Jocelin was engaged on Wells, the first place as a study of pure Early English Architecture. At the time of the translation of Poore from Chichester, the Episcopal throne of his new diocese was erected in what is now called Old Sarum, a barren place, and within the influence of rude soldiery where the church seemed still a captive, or at best in the wilderness, so that a poet describes it in these sorry terms, " Est ubi clefectus lymphse, seel copia cretae, Saevit ibi ventus, sed Philomela silet." Far different was the valley beneath this inhospitable site ; there the fields were yellow with an early harvest, and two danc- ing rivulets flowed together through verdant meads. The peo- ple called it Merryfield ; and joyfully did the monks of Old Sarum seek so fair a spot for a new habitation. Thither Richard Poore brought together the most celebrated and the most skilful workmen that could be found, and there by the hands of Pan- dulf the Pope's Legate, were five stones laid ; the first for the pope, the second for the king, the third for the earl, the fourth for the countess, and the fifth for the Bishop of Salisbury. Nor did the king and his nobles leave the great work without more substantial aid than an honorary token of their interest in its foundation, " Rex largitur opes, fert prsesul opem, lapicidse Dant operam ; tribus his, est opus, et stet opus." So writes an old poet, quoted by Godwin, who however adds " Sed elegantius alius poeta itidem vetustus, ' Regis enim virtus templo spectabitur isto, Prsesulis affectus, artificumque fides.' " But with all submission, the last whether or no more elegant THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 219 than the first is not so much to the purpose. It would not be easy to express in fewer or better words than those first quoted, the part which a monarch's authority and resources, a Bishop's superintendence and skill, and the people's pains and labour should have, in the erection and support of the material fabric of the church, and under God, of the spiritual temple. But we have yet another " multo elegantius/' and though we again demur to the comparative estimate of the verses, we can- not refrain from giving in his own words the enumeration of some of the principal features of this church, by an ancient writer. Camden then, from whom Bishop Gibson quotes the preceding, adds, " Sed multo elegantius clarissimus et eruditissimus Daniel Rogersius — ' Mira canam, Soles quot continet annus in una Tarn numerosa, ferunt, sede, fenestra micat. Marmoreasque capit fusas tot ab arte columnas, Comprensas horas quot vagus annus habet. Totque patent porta?, quot mensibus annus abundat, Res mira, at vera res celebrata fide.'" The accident of an unusually dry season enables us to state the dimensions of the Cathedral at Old Sarum. In the summer of 1834 the foundations of the original church, completed by Bishop Osmond became distinctly visible. A comparison of its dimensions with those of the present structure fairly represents the advance that had been made in the splendour of ecclesiasti- cal buildings ; and will also indicate certain changes in the rela- tive dimensions of their several parts. The length of the nave was about one hundred and fifty feet, that of the choir sixty feet, and the total length two hundred and seventy feet. Of the present Cathedral the total length is four hundred and eighty- feet, of which the nave occupies about two hundred, the choir nearly as much, the remainder being taken up with the space under the central tower, and with the Lady Chapel at the east end. The breadth of the old nave and aisles was seventy-two feet, that of the present west face is one hundred and twelve feet. The ancient transept was one hundred and fifty feet by sixty, the present greater transept is two hundred and thirty-two feet by eighty-two : and there is an additional eastern transept, of one hundred and seventy-two feet by sixty -five ; the smaller 220 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. of the two Early English transepts being larger than the great Norman cross. The most important differences here noted are the greater complexity of form in the addition of an entire transept, and the greater comparative length of the choir ; the latter being a very constant feature in churches of Early Eng- lish and subsequent dates, as compared with those of the twelfth and preceding centuries. Richard Poore was translated to Durham in 1228, leaving the care of the works at Salisbury to Elias de Derham, who had from the first acted as architect ; and the building was not finished till the Episcopate of Giles of Bridport, in whose time it was consecrated, thirty-five years after the laying of the first stones, September 30, 1258. The expenses incurred during its progress are stated in accounts delivered to King Henry III., at 40,000 marks or about £26,666 13s. M. of our money. 1 At Durham Bishop Poore was not idle, if as is supposed he built the Nine Altars, 2 a structure like the western front of Ely to be noted as originating a new feature in ecclesiastical edifices, this being the first transeptal addition recorded to the extreme east end of a church, extending the east front on both sides be- yond the line of the chancel aisles. The same arrangement was followed at Fountains, and at one or two other churches in later times. Bishop Poore died in 1237 at Farrant Crawford, in Dorsetshire, the place of his birth, in a monastery of his own foundation, and there his heart was buried, but his body was carried to Salis- bury, and Leland gives this inscription from his tomb in the Lady Chapel : — 1 Winkles' Cathedrals, I. 3. 2 Although the erection of the nine altars is usually attributed to Bishop Poore, I find nothing in the continua- tion of Turgot in the Anglia Sacra touching the fabric, until the Episco- pate of Nicholas de Farnham, who was elected in 1241, and under his life we are told that in the year 1242, Prior Thomas began the new portion of the church, about the feast of S. Michael, the Bishop assisting, and assigning the church of Bedlington for the purpose. "Anno Domini mccxlii, incoepit Thomas Prior novam fabricam Eccle- sise circa Festum S. Michaelis, juvante Episcopo et Ecclesiam de Bedlington ad ejus fabricam conferente.'' — Anglia Sacra, ii. 737. If this nova fabrica be the nine al- tars, which seems most probable, this positive testimony must outweigh the presumptive evidence from the charac- ter of Bishop Poore, as an architect, and the resemblance of the nine al- tars to his work at Salisbury. THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 221 " Orate pro anima Ric. Poure quondam Sarum Episcopi ; qui Ecclesiam hanc inchoari fecit in quodam fundo, ubi nunc fundata est, ex antiquo nomine Miryfelde, in honore B. V. Maria? 3 Kal. Maii in Eesto S. Vitalis Martyris a.d. 1219, regnante tunc Rege Ricardo post Conq. primo. Fuitque Ecclesia hsec sedificando per spatium 40 annorum, et consummata est 8 Kal. Apr. a.d. 1260. Obiit 15 Apr. a.d. 1237 et 21 H. 3."— Leland, Itinera, f. 62. We must expend some pains on one other example of the Early English style before we pass to the transition between this style and the Decorated. The history of Westminster Abbey might be made almost a history of England, so intimately are its several parts, and the treasures of imagery which it contains, interwoven with the memorials of all our kings, of all our statesmen, of all our heroes, and of all our revolutions ; nor would a full description of the church with all that is known of its history, with the re- cords of the several charges of its erection, with all the circum- stances under which the several works it contains were carried on, and with a fair estimate of their relative and actual merits, fall very far short of a precis of the history of mediaeval architec- ture and of ecclesiastical art in general. But we propose to our- selves no such work. We have but to bring the history of the fabric by a rapid sketch to the conclusion of the Early English period, and though we may sometimes recur to the several parts of this great fabric and its varied contents, it will be but to exemplify some passing subject. The most probable history of S. Peter's church, Westminster, refers its first foundation to King Sebert, about the year 616; and Sulcardus a monk of Westminster, about the close of the eleventh century, tells us the fabric newly erected was dedicated by S. Peter himself, who appeared miraculously for the purpose of anticipating Mellitus the bishop in that sacred service. When Mellitus was told of the visit of the saint, he hastened to the church and there found the chrism, the droppings of wax tapers and other signs of an actual consecration : a legend which we mention chiefly for the proof which it affords of the very early use of these portions of the ritual of consecration. 222 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. However, the story of the consecration by S. Peter himself was adopted by other writers, for Ailred tells us that S. Peter appeared to a monk named Wulsinus, and told him that there was a place in the west part of London which he had formerly consecrated to himself with his own hands, honoured with his presence, and rendered illustrious by miracles, [quam quondam mihi propriis manibus consecravi, mea nobilitavi presentia, divi- nis insuper miraculis illustravi,] which had become impoverished, and which the king (Edward the Confessor) was appointed to rebuild. " Non erit aliud," said the Apostle, "nisi domus Dei et porta cceli," a vaticination which the splendour of the fabric doubtless fully justified, so far as it could be interpreted into a prediction of its material beauty. The king heard of the vision, and appropriated to its fulfil- ment a tenth part of his entire substance, in gold, silver, cattle, and all other possessions ; and pulling down the old church, constructed a new one from the foundations. Sulcardus states that it was but a few years in building, as the king pressed on the work very earnestly. Compared with the former edifice it was a very magnificent fabric ; and according to Matthew Paris, it after- wards became a pattern much followed in the erection of churches. Sulcardus says, " the new church was supported by divers columns, from which sprang a multiplicity of arches and Sir Christopher Wren, from an ancient manuscript, " the sense of which," he remarks, " I translate into language proper for build- ers, and as I can understand it," describes it as follows : u The principal area or nave of the church being raised high, and vaulted with square and uniform ribs, is turned circular to the east ; this on each side is strongly fortified with a double vault- ing of the aisles in two stories, with their pillars and arches. The cross building contrived to contain the quire in the middle, and the better to support the lofty tower, rose with a plainer and lower vaulting ; which tower then spreading with artificial winding stairs, was continued with plain walls to its timber roof, which was well covered with lead." 1 1 For this and other portions of the tiquities of the Abbey church of S. history of Westminster Abbey, I am Peter's, Westminster." indebted to Neale's " History and An THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 223 Edward lived to the completion of his church, but a mortal sickness prevented his being present at its consecration, and he was buried a few days after, (Jan. 5, 1066,) before the high altar. But his body did not rest here. Edward became, more from the tyranny of the Normans, who succeeded to the sove- reignty of England, than from his own merits, a national fa- vourite; and having been canonized by Alexander II., his body was translated to a precious shrine in the abbey, erected on purpose, at midnight, on the 3rd of the ides of October, 1163. It was not to be supposed that Westminster, second to no foundation in its ecclesiastical position, and under the especial patronage of kings, should remain unaltered, when Canterbury had arisen more glorious from its ruins, and when many other churches had already assumed a fairer form, under the influence of the newly introduced style of architecture. In 1220, Henry III. laid the first stone of a chapel in honour of S. Mary the Virgin, where Henry VII. 's chapel now stands, and the erection of this, and the rest of the church was continued throughout Henry's reign. During the long period of twenty-four years the king had a counsellor and assistant in the work in Abbot Berkynge, who died in 1246, and was buried in the Lady Chapel so lately founded. The preceding year Henry had com- manded that the church should be enlarged, and that the tower, with the eastern part should be taken down, and rebuilt more splendidly at his own charges. For the better husbanding the resources devoted to this work by the king, a new office with two treasurers was established. The collection of revenues for such purposes is one of the most interesting subjects of our history, and in this case we have several indications of the sources from whence it was derived. In 1246, £2591 due to the king from the widow of a Jew named David, of Oxford, was assigned by him to the erection of the church. A gift of £2000 from the citizens of London, ex- torted with some difficulty, was applied to the same purpose. A fair of fifteen days was granted to the Abbot of Westminster, the profits of which were probably carried to the same account. In 1270 the sum of £3,754 paid by the Lady Alice Lacy, for eleven years' custody of her son's estate, was applied towards the 224 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. furtherance of the works of the Abbey church. At his death, Henry committed the charge of the unfinished church to his son, with a bequest of five hundred marks of silver for the com- pletion of the Confessor's shrine. The donations of Cardinal Langham at different times amounted to .€10,800 ; and many other gifts of individuals were received, among which vestments and church plate and jewels are continually recorded, and in some instances materials for the fabric. " On the 13th of Oc- tober, 1269, the new church, of which the eastern part with the choir and transept appears to have been at that time completed, was first opened for divine service ; and on the same day, the body of Edward the Confessor, ' that before laye in the syde of the quere, where the monkes nowe synge 9 was removed with solemnity, ' into ye chapell at the backe of the hygh aulter, and there layde in a ryche shryne/ which the king had caused to be made for its reception. The vast pomp that accompanied this ceremony may be appreciated from a passage in Thomas Wykes, who, speaking of Henry the Third, proceeds thus : — c This prince being grieved that the reliques of Saint Edward were poorly enshrined and not elevated, resolved that so great a lumi- nary should not lie buried, but be placed high on a candlestick, to enlighten the church. He therefore, on the 3rd of the ides of October, the day of Edward's first translation, summoned the nobility, magistrates, and burgesses of the land, to Westminster, to attend so solemn an affair: at which time the chest being- taken out of the old shrine, the king, and his brother the king of the Romans, carried it upon their shoulders in the view of the whole church, and his sons, Edward, (afterwards king,) and Edmund, Earl of Lancaster, the Earl of Warren, and the Lord Philip Basset, with as many other nobles as could come near to touch it, supported it with their hands to the new shrine, which was of gold adorned with precious stones, and eminently placed in the church/ " Henry the Third died on the 16th of November, 1272, and within four days afterwards, with as much solemnity as the time would admit, he e was buryed vpon the south syde of Saint Ed- warde in Westmynster/ The following verses are given by Fabian, as having been ' wryten in a table hangynge vpon ye tombe of the sayd Henry/ THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 225 " Tercius Henricus iacet hie, pietatis amicus : Ecclesiam strauit istam quam post renouauit. Reddat ei munus qui regnat trinus et vnus." The gifts which this sovereign made to S. Peter's Church, in- dependently of the great sums he had caused to be expended in rebuilding it, were extremely munificent. They consisted, says the historian, of robes, jewels, and curious vessels, which were beheld with admiration and astonishment, and would have co- piously enriched even a royal treasury. Among these valuables were the following, as particularized by Strype in his extracts from the Tower records. " ' In the twenty-eighth year of his reign, he commanded Edward Fitz- Odo to make a dragon, in manner of a standard, or ensign, of red samit, to be embroidered with gold, and his tongue to appear as though continu- ally moving, and his eyes of sapphires, or other stones agreeable to him, to be placed in this church against the King's coming thither.' Again, ' In the thirtieth of his reign, he commanded the keeper of his exchequer to buy out of the monies there, as precious a mitre as could be found in the city of London, for the Abbot of Westminster's use; and also, one great crown of silver to set wax candles upon in the said church.' And again, when the Queen set up 4 the image of the Blessed Virgin Mary in the feretry of S. Edward,' ' the King caused the aforesaid Edward Fitz-Odo, keeper of his works at Westminster, to place upon her forehead for orna- ment, an emerald and a ruby, taken out of two rings which the Bishop of Chichester had left the King for a legacy.' " Among the additional privileges with which this sovereign invested the Abbots, were those of holding a weekly market at Tuthill (called Touthull in the grant,) on Mondays, and an annual fair of three days' continuance ; that is, on the eve, the day, and the morrow of the festival of S. Mary Magdalen : this grant was dated at Windsor, in his forty-first year. Henry, also, by different grants, gave eight bucks to the Abbot, with liberty to make a park in Windsor Forest, and a warren of ten acres and a half. Even in dying, the advance of this church was among the last subjects which occupied his thoughts ; and by his will, he committed the completion of his plan to his eldest son (who had been named Edward from his favourite saint,) together with 500 marks of silver to finish the Confessor's shrine." At the time of Henry III.'s death, the Early English style was fast approximating to the earlier or Geometrical Decorated, and accordingly we have in the windows and in the triforium of the Q 226 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. choir and transepts which were his part of the fabric, foliated circles introduced in the heads of the lights, the first advance towards regular tracery. Edward in carrying on his father's de- sign, seems to have had more regard than was common to the style of the part already concluded ; so that the whole minster, though in date its later portions fall in with the succeeding style, is in general character Early English. What were the principal features of that style we now pro- ceed to explain. Among the characteristics of the church architecture of a period, the first place is due to those more important arrange- ments, which affect the ground-plan ; and though these may in a great measure be inferred from what has been already said, it will be better to state them more formally and connectedly. First, then, and principally, in large conventual churches, the choir is now very greatly enlarged, being full twice the usual length of the Norman choir ; and thus room is gained for the choral services, without carrying the stalls into the nave. Be- sides this, there is often an additional eastern transept, either midway between the cross and the east end, as at Salisbury and Wells ; or at the extreme east, as at Durham and Fountains. There is also in several cases a more elaborate west front than the old Norman termination of the aisles by western towers and a centre gable afforded, as has been observed already in the cases of Ely, Peterborough, and Wells, and as appears also in Salisbury and Lincoln. Thus, without mentioning the addition of chapels and other appendages differing only in number, and not in any principle, from those which had already accumulated round every large church from the first, we have in general a greater complication of parts in this than in the preceding style. On the other hand crypts are almost, and apses are quite dis- continued; but this from no repugnance to a polygonal figure, for chapter-houses of this period are usually polygonal, whereas they were previously quadrilateral. The form now adopted was retained in after periods. It was probably suggested by some arbitrary association of a number of persons forming the chap- ter with a number of sides to the building in which they met in synod. Of exterior features buttresses assume a greater prominence, THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 227 and are often carried up in stages, and finished with a triangular pediment. Flying buttresses begin to produce as great effect on the outward aspect of the church, as on its constructive cha- racter; and pinnacles with all their luxuriant additions of crockets and finials, are corollaries of the buttress, as the but- tress is of the pointed arch. Towers rise to a greater elevation over the roof, and are very generally finished with a spire, some- times of great height. The most frequent Early English spire is that called the broach, where the spire does not rise from within parapets, but is carried up on four of its sides from the top of the square tower, the diagonal faces resting on squinches, or arches thrown across the corners within, and finished on the outside in a slope. But a great many of the Early English spires were wooden frames, covered with lead or shingles ; and these in general, as well as in a few instances stone spires, were connected with the tower in a different way, the spire itself being at first only four-sided, and the angles being canted off a little above the base, to form the octagon. 1 In the interior of large churches the triforium still retains its relative importance, being very remarkable both in size and deco- ration. The greatest change is in the roof. Before, only the aisles were vaulted, and the vaulting was very simple : now the large span of the nave, choir, and transepts does not deter the architect from throwing across it a pointed vault, springing from below the clerestory windows. The pointed arch, indeed, gives the most distinctive character to the whole, and makes everything lighter and loftier. Nor was any advance made in these respects even to the close of the Tudor period, the loftiest building being the Early English. The roof of Westminster Abbey is no less than one hundred feet from the ground ; and the Early English spire of old S. Paul's was the highest in Europe. In parish churches, the sacrarium is no longer added, as con- structively distinct from the chancel ; unless a central tower may seem to make that distinction, and this is by no means frequent, except in cross churches. On the other hand the nave is more 1 As for instance at Denford. See the Churches of the Archdeaconry of Northampton, No. V. Q 2 228 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. universally furnished with aisles ; and a steeple, often both tower and spire, is very frequently added at the west end ; the spire as in larger churches being the broach, or the wooden spire already described. 1 The tower assumes an octagonal 2 form first during this period, but very infrequently : the only example that occurs to me is Stanwiek in Northamptonshire. Descending to less prominent parts of the building ; the doors are almost all pointed, 3 and in large and fine specimens several jamb shafts each with its separate base and capital, carry as many suits of mouldings in the head of the door. Sometimes the doorways are divided by a shaft, or cluster of shafts in the centre, and each opening is richly foliated, the spandrels being either pierced with a trefoil, or quatrefoil, or filled with carving. The windows are always, at first, and very often to the close of the style, single uncusped lancets. Early in the style, however, two, three, five or seven, lancets are sometimes grouped together under one hood ; or by the elevation of the central lancet, or by some arrangements of the rerevault, are rendered one in compo- sition, especially in the interior : and the spaces between the heads are frequently pierced with foliated circles, or with trefoils or quatrefoils not enclosed in a circle ; and often in the place of this piercing is a panel of like device, but not carried through the wall. These methods of relieving the heads of groups of lancets are very important, as indicating the approach of tracery, and of windows of many lights. But the finest and largest group of Early English lancets in the kingdom is without this or any other method of subordination : this is the five lancets, commonly called "the five sisters," in the north transept of 1 It is almost needless to add that not many Early English wooden spires remian. 2 At Osleworth, in Gloucestershire, is an hexagonal tower, the part next the nave being square, that next the chan- cel having the square edges canted off. This is Norman, the tower of Stanwiek is at first hexagonal, but becomes oc- tagonal above the roof of the nave. 3 "There are small interior doors of this style with flat tops, and the sides of the top supported by a quarter cir- cle from each side."— Rickman. I should not however limit this form to interiors. It should be added too, that small doorways are sometimes trefoil-headed, as in the tower stairs of Burton Latimer. See Churches of the Archdeaconry of Northampton. See also a cinquefoil, and a square trefoil door, at Sutton and at Salisbury, figured in the Glossary. THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 229 York Minster. They are nearly fifty feet in height, and in the interior have a beauty which is altogether their own, and is not surpassed, if it is equalled by any Decorated or Perpendicular window in the kingdom. The rose or wheel windows of this style also deserve especial mention. That in the south transept of York is of great size and beauty. The use of foliations and cuspings, always most employed in the heads of windows, commences with this style. So far as it is purely accessary, it will be noticed in the next chapter : but there is a kind of foliating which is now found, which regulates the form of the window or other arch itself ; and in describing which it is hardly correct to speak of a trefoiled, but rather of a trefoil-headed lancet or doorway : or of a trefoil panel or corbel. In such cases there is no outer pointed arch, but the head or panel or corbel itself is thrown into the form of a trefoil. This is the case, for instance, with the door at Burton Latimer referred to in a preceding note. It is the case with many windows, as at Stanton S. John, Oxfordshire, and the rear arch of a lancet in Hythe church, Kent, 1 and also at Shipton OllifFe, Gloucestershire. In the latter case the windows them- selves are square-headed, a rare circumstance in the Early Eng- lish, but not unique. 2 There is also a window combined of the trefoil and the square head, the upper lobe of the trefoil being cut off horizontally. This is called the square-headed trefoil. It occurs to the west and south of the little chapel of S. Mary Magdalen, Ripon, 3 and indeed is not very unusual. In all the cases of trefoiled openings, or panels of any num- ber of foils, the point of each foil is very frequently enriched with a flower or patera. The jamb shafts common in Norman windows, are discon- tinued in exteriors in Early English (except in towers, or where the windows are parts of arcades) ; but it is brought into the interior, and is much modified and enriched, the shafts 1 See Brandon's Analysis, Sec. I. Early English, plate 20. 9 A square-headed window very sin- gularly treated, will be found in the west end of Ringstead, figured in the Churches of the Archdeaconry of Nor- thampton. 3 See Churches of Yorkshire. 230 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. generally standing free and being sometimes tripled. But the place that they hold in the composition of the fabric is of more importance than any of these details concerning Early English windows. So long as they are single or double lancets,, they are subordinate to the composition, as in the Norman period ; but when they are thrown into groups so as to adapt them- selves to the form of the roof, and to rise high towards the point of the gable, and still more when they begin to receive tracery, they assume a very different degree of importance. Henceforward they are not only introduced as essential to the purposes for which the fabric is erected, and then decorated be- cause every useful part must also be rendered beautiful; but they are themselves decorations, and treated as such, at last even forming centres around which decorations are grouped, and affording patterns after which they are designed. The piers in large and highly enriched churches are now of great beauty. The usual plan is of a central circle with four, eight, or more slender shafts, (often quite detached,) clustered around it. The shafts are frequently surrounded by bands or fillets, a feature which they borrow from late Norman, 1 (though the section is very different,) but which they do not transmit to the Decorated : and this fillet occurs in the shafts, in door and window jambs, in short everywhere where shafts are found. The shafts are generally of Purbeck or other dark marble. In smaller churches the pillars, instead of being surrounded by free shafts, are frequently of a quatrefoil section, no part, or but a small part of the central circle appearing. The octagonal shaft is also now pretty frequent. The foliage of capitals, and other parts which follow the same form, as brackets and corbels, no longer imitates that of the Corin- thian acanthus, nor is it the almost indescribable knotted and knobbed foliage of the Normans ; but it is equally conventional though in a different way. 2 It is usually described as crisped and curled, rising on stiff stalks which form part of the composition from the neck of the capital. It turns over beneath the abacus 1 There are remarkable examples at 8. Peter's, Northampton. 2 The Decorated foliage is more na- tural than the Early English. The Perpendicular again becomes more conventional, though of very different forms. THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 231 with a peculiar curve ; and though stiff it has a singular grace, from its luxuriance and the delicacy and sharpness of its exe- cution. The mouldings of this style are bolder and more effective than any other. It must be remembered that an elaborate Norman arch was formed of several subarches, and that the mouldings were cut in the wall and soffit planes of these, the point of junc- tion of each subarch with its principal being left square. In this style, especially at first, the mouldings still occupy the wall and soffit plane almost exclusively : but instead of the retiring angle made by the junction of one order with another, (i.e. of the subarch with its principal,) being left square, a three quarter round is struck from the point of junction of the two orders as a centre, so that now the several orders of mouldings are sepa- rated by a deep hollow. The several surfaces, originally square, of the orders, are also deeply indented with hollows, and the bowtels or prominent portions of the mouldings thus left, are of bold forms, as three quarter circles, retaining their hold on the mass only by a narrow neck, and enriched sometimes by one, two, or three fillets. There is also a bowtel, expressively called keel-shaped, very distinctive of this style, which terminates ex- ternally in a point. But it would be impossible without sec- tions to convey any impression of the contour of Early English mouldings. These matters touch the very principle of mouldings, and form an important part in the history of their development, or they would not be stated so much at length. The same may be said of another characteristic of the Early English, as compared with the preceding and subsequent mouldings. We have already observed that the Normans were fond of decorating surfaces, and that their most elaborate decorations of moulded surfaces, were rather enrichments of mouldings, than themselves actual mouldings* This is true for instance of the medallion, of the chain, and of the chevron, which are com- monly called mouldings, but which are in fact repetitions of un- moulded figures, upon the surfaces of mouldings. Now these unmoulded decorations always in the Norman occupy the promi- nent parts ; in the Early English, the dog-tooth in its several varieties and the nail-head, (the only two forms at all analogous 232 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. with those before mentioned,) occupy the hollows, and not the prominent surfaces. And this rule holds in all the succeeding styles, the ball-flower of the Decorated, and the flat four-leaved flower of the Perpendicular, still retiring within the slopes and hollows. In the contour of these ornaments there is something characteristic of the several styles to which they are appropriated, so that they not only do co-exist, but there is a manifest reason why they should co-exist with their attendant forms. The dog-tooth of the Early English is sharp and angular, and deeply seamed, and receives the light on prominent points and edges : the ball- flower of the Decorated is rounded and softened, and its lights and shadows are gently blended : the Perpendicular flower is flattened and frittered away in its effect, and has no part vividly presented to the eye. Again, in their arrangement. The dog- tooth is set in one continuous serrated rank ; its expression is force and exuberance as well as beauty : the ball-flower occurs at moderate intervals, uncrowded and yet rich, without force, but perfect in beauty : the rank of distant flowers in the Perpen- dicular is poor and attenuated, without the force and beauty of exuberance and combination. There is yet another character in certain Early English mould- ings of great richness, which must be noted, because its total disappearance in the subsequent styles indicates the progress towards a distinct continuousness of lines, free from abrupt transitions, from breaks and intersections of several parts. I have perhaps too often observed, how the decorations of Norman mouldings occupy their prominent faces : there are also decora- tions of another class which seem to belong to two several parts of a suit of mouldings, and to bring their prominent faces to- gether. For instance, " the beak head," " the cat's head," and "the bird's head," each a decoration of a suit of mouldings, originates in the upper square and curls over the lower semicir- cular member. The " open heart," does the same, and the "overlapping" 1 even encloses the mouldings of two planes at right angles to one another, in one network of decoration. The chevron sometimes, as in the south doorway of Hargrave, 2 1 See all these figured in the Glos- 2 Churches of the Archdeaconry of sary. Northampton, No. II. THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 233 Northamptonshire, and in the west doorway of Orpington, Kent, 1 connects the mouldings of different planes in a very remarkable manner. These last are instances of transition to the Early English, and will therefore at once lead us to note the Early English adaptation of this method. We find the same thing then in the Early English, though here foliage is always the connecting link between the members of mouldings. In the south door of Woodford, 2 the filleted edges of two mouldings separated by a third, throw off a leaf which curls over the intervening hollow, (which it leaves free,) and meets the fillet at the edge of the central bowtel. In the rear arch, and again in the head of the lights of the east window of the choir of Romsey, the beautiful foliage unites several moulded members in the same way. 3 In the exquisite and highly characteristic monument of Archbishop Walter Grey, in the south transept of York Minster ; the foliage springing from the surface of the tomb curls over the shafts, otherwise free, which support the gablet over the head of the figure; and some of the foliage of the capitals of the shafts instead of curling downwards, as if turned back by the abacus, rises over it, and rests its topmost leaves upon its highest mould- ing; peculiarities, slight as they are, which will be seen in the plate of this monument in Britton's History of York Minster. A reference to these figures will at once exemplify my meaning, 4 and as I should despair to make myself intelli- gible without the help of a figure, I shall not labour the de- scription farther. Now in the Decorated and Perpendicular mouldings the decorations always repose in the hollows, and never wander from the single hollow in the bosom of which they are shaded. In the Early English this is the case with those decorations which 1 Brandon's Analysis, Sec. I. Semi- Norman, plate 1 . 2 Churches of Northamptonshire, No. V. p. 84. 3 See Mr. Petit' s account of this church in the Winchester volume of the transactions of the Archaeological Institute. 4 See also an example from Win- chester, and another from Salisbury, among the Early English mouldings in the Glossary. Also the details of the arcade in the north of the nave of New Shoreham, Sussex. Brandon's Analysis, Section I. Semi-Norman, plates 2, 3, 4. 234 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. originate in the hollow ; but others spring from a prominent round or fillet, and these wander over the intervening hollow, and rest on the next salient point. The extreme beauty of every instance of this kind makes us regret its infrequency at all times, and its utter extinction at last ; and we must trace its early dis- appearance to the love of facility which took deep root at the birth of the Flowing Decorated, and gives expression (that of ease and grace as opposed to luxuriance and successful effort) to the architecture of that day. We conclude the chapter, as usual, with one or two instances of the destruction of ecclesiastical edifices, and we still find the hand of violence and of sacrilege but too active in the work of demolition. In 1264 the Church of Rochester suffered grievously from sacrilegious violence. The Earl of Warren and Lord Leyburne kept the town and castle of Rochester, against the Earl of Leicester and the Barons. Among other excesses committed by the assailants, these servants of the devil entered the church of S. Andrew with drawn swords, and there slaughtered several of the children of the church, together with others who had fled thither for safety ; crucifying them, as it were, with their Lord (it was on the morrow of Good Eriday,) Who suffers in His elect. They destroyed many muniments and much treasure belonging to the church ; and as the monks fled to the very altars for safety, with wicked hands they drew them forth from thence, following them even round the altar on horseback. day of tears and of woe, in which the noble Church of Rochester, with all its wealth, became the spoil of base men, who gave to it no more reverence than to the vilest shed or stable. All its gates were burnt, its choir resounded with the voice of woe, and the organs uttered only notes of lamentation. The sacred places, the very oratories, the cloisters, the chapter-house, the infirmary, in short all places which were more holy than the rest, were converted into stables for horses, and were everywhere choked with the filth of animals and the corruption of dead bodies. 1 1 " Ecclesiam insuper B. Andrese satellites diaboli gladiis evaginatis in- trogressi, filios ipsius et quosque re- pertos in ea cum timore et horrore crucifixerunt cum Domino qui patitur in suis electis ; auro et argento aliis- que pretiosis inde violenter ablatis. . . Equites vero in equis armati circa alta- THE EARLY ENGLISH PERIOD. 235 On the festival of SS. Peter and Paul, in the year 1272, while the convent of Norwich was singing prime, a terrible storm of thunder and lightning broke over the church, and a thunder- bolt at the same time struck the tower of Trinity Church with such violence, that several stones were cast down to the ground, and much damage was done to the church. All the brethren except three fled in terror from the church, and of these one fell to the ground as if dead ; the other two continued to chant their parts until the rest returned. These things seemed to many to presage some greater misfortune, and the event justified their belief, for on the morrow of S. Laurence in the same year, the citizens of Norwich besieged the monastery, and having in vain endeavoured to effect an entrance by force, they set fire to the great gates and burnt them, together with a parish-church which stood beyond, and with all the ornaments, books, and images which it contained. At the same instant they set fire to the great alms-house, and to the gates of the church, and to the great bell-tower, which were all destroyed, together with the bells. Some of them also threw fire with balisters from the tower of S. George into the great bell-tower which was outside the choir, from which fire all the church was miraculously pre- served, except the Chapel of the Blessed Virgin. Thus they burnt the dormitory, the refectory, the locutorium, the infirmary, with the chapels, and almost all the buildings of the court. Several of the servants, some subdeacons, and some clerics, they slew in the cloisters, and within the enclosure of the monastery ; some they dragged away and put to death in the city, and some they imprisoned. They carried off the sacred vessels, and books, the gold and silver, the vestments, and everything that was not destroyed by fire, driving away all the monks except two or three ; ria discursantes, quosdam ad ilia coo- fugientes nefandis manibus extraxe- runt. O luctuosa funestaque dies, in qua nobilis Ecclesia Roffensis cum omnibus contends in ea vilium homi- num facta fuit prsedatio, qui ipsi non plus honoris seu reverentiae quam vilissimo prostibulo seu tugurio de- ferebant ! Porta siquidem ejus cir- cumquaque exusta sunt, chorus ejus in luctum, et organa ejus in vocem flentium sunt concitata. Quid plura ! loca sacra, utpote oratoria, claustra, capitulum, infirmaria, et oracula quse- que divina, stabula equorum sunt effecta ; et animalium immunditiis spurcitiisque cadaverum ubique sunt repleta." — Edm.de Hadenham, Annal. Ecc. Roff. Anglia Sacra, I. 351. 236 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. and this course they pursued for three days. For this the city was placed under interdict, and it happened that a certain bell in the bell-tower which had been broken at the same time, fell to the ground. 1 1 u Anno mcclxxii. In die Apos- tolorum Petri et Pauli, hora qua con- ventus Norwici prima psallebat, facta sunt tonitrua magna et coruscationes et fulgura ; sed et ictus tonitrui in tanta fortitudine simul in turrim Ecclesiae Sanctae Trinitatis Norwici descendit, quod lapides quamplurimos de praefata turri horribiliter evulsit, et in terram violenter prostravit, et earn non medi- ocriter deturpavit. Sed et omnes fra- tres prae timore de choro fugerunt, exceptis tribus, quorum unus cecidit in terram quasi mortuus, et caeteri duo psalmodiam pro modulo suo sustenta- bant, quousque caeteri reversi : unde creditur a pluribus, quod ista accide- rant in praesagium futuri et majoris infortunii. Eodem anno cives in crastino S. Laurentii, obsederunt cu- riam monachorum per girum ; qui cum per insultum non potuerunt habere in- gressum, apposuerunt ignem, videlicet ad magnas portas monasterii, ultra quas erat quaedam Ecclesia parochialis ; et eas cum praedicta Ecclesia et cum omnibus ornamentis, libris et imaginibus et cum singulis in eadem contentis combusse- runt. Item apposuerunt ignem in eo- dem instanti ad magnam domum elee- mosynarum, et ad portas Ecclesiae, et ad magnum campanile ; quae omnia cum campanis statim combusta sunt. Quidam vero ex ipsis extra turrim Sancti Georgii ignem in magnum cam- panile, quod fuit ultra chorum, per balistas traxerunt ; ex quibus ignibus tota ecclesia praeter capellam Beatae Mariae miraculose salvata est ; com- busserunt dormitorium, refectorium, aulam hospitum, infirmariam cum ca- pella : et quasi omnia aedificia curiae consumpserunt igne. Quam plures de familia, aliquos subdiaconos, aliquos clericos, aliquos laicos, in claustro et infra septa monasterii interfecerunt ; aliquos extraxerunt ; et in civitate morti tradiderunt, aliquos incarcerave- runt. Post quae ingressi, omnia sacra vasa, libros, aurum et argentum, vestes et omnia alia, quae non fuerunt igne consumpta, depraedati fuerunt : mo- nachos omnes, praeter duos vel tres, a monasterio fugantes. His non con- tenti, malitiam suam usque ad tertium diem continuaverunt, comburendo, in- terficiendo, depraedando . . . et quod- dam tintinnabulum in campanili eodem tempore fractum cecidit." — Bartholo- maei de Cotton, Annales Norwicenses. Anglia Sacra, I. 399. 237 CHAPTER XIII. The Period of Geometric Tracery. Confusion of Arrangement in Ecclesiological Works. — Introduc- tion of Tracery ; its first development in Geometric Forms, coetaneous with the early english for a long time, and with the Decorated Style on its First Appearance. — Of Cusping and Tracery in general. — Of Panelling. — Results of the In- troduction of Tracery. — Chapter-House of York. — Merton College Chapel. — Ripon Minster. — Exeter Cathedral. — Lin- coln Cathedral. — Wells Lady Chapel and Chapter-House. — Temple-Balsall. — " Architectural Parallels." — Tintern. — Guisborough. — Vale-Royal Abbey. — Queen Eleanor's Crosses. The student of ecclesiastical architecture must have felt, when he would apply the rules which he has learned from Mr. Rick- man's invaluable work, that in one portion of his arrangement there is some confusion. To the Early English, Rickman gives the reigns of Richard I., John, Henry III., and Edward I., or the interval between the years 1189 and 1307 ; yet in describ- ing the style to which he gives the name Decorated, and to which he assigns the two next reigns, or the interval between 1307 and 1377, he especially classes under that style the geo- metrical tracery, or that tracery in which " the figures, such as circles, trefoils, quatrefoils, &c, are all worked with the same moulding, and do not always regularly join each other, but touch only at points ; and this," he says, " may be called geo- metrical tracery." Now it so happens that a very large proportion of the build- ings in which this kind of tracery is used, belongs to the period before called Early English. And the examples which might have been supposed to clear up the difficulty, only make it greater. Thus, in speaking of the chapter-house at York, which has splendid geometric tracery, he says, " The chapter- house is of Decorated character. " Yet the chapter-house, 238 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. though certainly not erected according to the popular account in the time of Archbishop Walter Grey, who died in 1255, is clearly of a character which prevailed during a considerable part of that period which Rickman assigns to the Early English style. A very laudable desire on the part of the most competent writers on the same subject, to retain the nomenclature of their great master, has perpetuated the confusion. Eor example, the east window of Romsey Abbey is even earlier in character than the chapter-house at York : it is, indeed, purely Early English in mouldings and decorations. It has, however, geometrical tracery — if tracery it can be called — when the masonry between the circles is not pierced. This window is called Decorated by Mr. Petit, one of the first ecclesiologists of the day; but with a hint that it is chronologically somewhat earlier than some specimens generally called Early English. The whole passage is so indica- tive of the confusion to which I allude, that I shall transcribe it. " The windows of the choir are very beautiful specimens of the earliest Decorated window. They are of three lights, with wide shafted mullions, and geometrical tracery of foliated circles in their heads. The jambs internally are enriched with knobs of foliage, the design of the two windows in this respect being not quite the same. In many points these windows have more of an Early English than a Decorated character. Their date is pro- bably earlier than the cloisters and chapter-house at Salisbury." 1 Where there is this confusion of terms, as applied even by the same person, no wonder that different persons, and they equally well qualified to speak with authority, describe the same window differently. So the great east window of Raunds, which is called Early English by the author of the description of that church in the Churches of the Archdeaconry of Northampton, is included in Mr. Sharpens Series of Decorated Windows. Amidst all this confusion, the general tendency has been of late, to arrange with the Early English by far the greater pro- portion of those examples which answer to Rickman's definition of Geometrical Decorated : a few of the later examples only 1 Description of Romsey Abbey Church in the Archaeological Institute's Win- chester Volume, p. 12. THE PERIOD OF GEOMETRIC TRACERY. 239 being treated as transition from Early English to Decorated. The characters which this peculiar style has in common with Early English, perhaps, justify this arrangement. The mould- ings are generally of perfectly Early English character, and so are the clusters of foliage, the bosses, and other ornamental ap- pendages. There are, besides, many instances in which the pure and simple Early English lancet was used, during the reign of the geometrical tracery. How, then, are the two styles, if they be two, to be separated, in a system which is in part chronolo- gical ? How are they to be united, in a system which is also in part founded on similarity of parts ? It is, however, a most exquisite style, — perhaps the most per- fect of all the styles ; for its tracery has the completeness and precision of the Perpendicular, without its stiffness ; the variety of the flowing Decorated, without its licence and exuberance ; while its minor details partake of the boldness and sharpness of the Early English, which need not fear to be compared with the ornamental accessories of any subsequent style. These difficulties meeting us on either hand, I shall venture to treat of this peculiar development of mediaeval architecture, as sufficiently distinct from Early English to need a separate de- scription ; and yet as inseparable from it in chronological order, and as having more in common with it, though at first sight so very dissimilar, than with any other style. Besides the intrinsic beauty of this style it is important as af- fording the first full development of tracery and of cusping, with all their power of enriching large windows, and of bring- ing together several lights as one whole. Here, therefore, we may best investigate the history of tracery, with its effects on the size and proportions of windows, and on those various en- richments which fall into the arrangements of orbs, 1 or com- partments of tracery, and which are evidently copied from the windows of their respective styles. The Normans were absolutely without means of relieving the formal outline of the apertures of their windows. Their suc- cessors felt the want and soon employed cuspings or foliations to their lancets, but not in general in buildings of a very high order, 1 The very term orb, which is a mediaeval term, gives the parentage of panelling. An orb is a blind window. 240 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. as Salisbury for instance, and the transepts of York, in which the lancet is left to assert its grace and dignity by its own beautiful proportions, and by happy combinations. In this way we have the finest groups of Early English windows approach- ing in character to one window as nearly as a common hood without, and a common rerevault within can make them, yet still without tracery or even cusping. But by and by a farther connection between the lancets, where they were associated in couplets or triplets was desired, and the space between their points was pierced, and the whole group formed to the eye one window, of two or more large lights, with one or more smaller and subordinate lights between their heads. This piercing how- ever did not necessarily follow any of the lines of the lancets with which it was associated. It was generally a circle, trefoiled or quatrefoiled, though the lights over which it was placed were always pointed, and generally without foliations ; sometimes it was a quatrefoil without a circumscribing circle, as in the tri- forium of the nave of Romsey, and in the very beautiful trifo- rium of the choir of Ely Cathedral. Nor were the mouldings at all the same with those of the jambs and arches below them. In short these subsidiary lights were mere piercings of the wall, no otherwise connected with the windows than by being- placed in immediate juxtaposition with them. This device too was more generally used where two, than where three lancets were grouped together ; a triplet being more happily combined into one group by lengthening the middle light, and so giving harmony and subordination of parts to the whole. 1 So long as the additional piercings remain separated from their lancets by a portion of unmoulded masonry, and unasso- ciated with them by a series of mouldings common to the whole composition, they cannot be said to form tracery. They are no more entitled to that name than the foliated piercings or panels in the spandrels of arches, or other places where relief is required. As for instance the trefoils in spandrels at Ely, where the quatrefoils 1 In the triforium of the nave of intervention of an octofoil. The same Salisbury, four lancets are thus associ- arrangement in principle occurs in the ated ; rirst two and two under one arch, triforium of Whitby. — See Sharpe's with a quatrefoil between their heads ; Parallels, these again under one arch with the THE PERIOD OF GEOMETRICAL TRACERY. 241 between the lancets have been already mentioned. But by and bye the circles or other figures, (but circles in nine cases out of ten at the least) are formed of the same mouldings as the window- jambs, and rest immediately on the tops of the lights, or on one another, and no unmoulded masonry is left between them ; even the several triangles or other spaces left by the contact of the cir- cles, being pierced, wherever they are large enough for the mould- ings of the several touching circles to be carried through them. 1 And now we have tracery, strictly so called ; that is, a net work of open masonry, in no part more solid than it necessarily be- comes by the touchings and intersections of several lines of equal thickness. In the succeeding style, or that of the flowing Decorated, in- stead of forming perfect figures, each complete in itself, and touching and resting upon its neighbours : the several lines of the tracery branch out of each other, and return again to the same point, having in their course given out other branches ; an arrangement which often produces a feeling of insecurity, by the imperfect figure of each part, and still worse by the insuffi- cient balancing of several parts, 2 and this, with all the splen- dour of that most fascinating style, renders its tracery perhaps 1 In very early examples, to which case at Easby in the east end of the it is hard to deny the name of tracery, refectory (see Sharpe) ; and though those interstitial spaces are not pierced, this is a splendid example, the parti - simply because they are not large cular feature here alluded to must be enough for the repetition of the whole reckoned a defect, mouldings ; as in the south chancel of 2 As published examples are of Etton, Northamptonshire, figured by course chosen for their excellence, it Sharpe : compare with this Croft, is difficult to refer to marked examples Yorkshire, south chancel, in the same of these defects, though the church series, where two of the spaces are tourist finds them perpetually. I may just, and only just pierced : and War- however refer to Heckington, (one of mington, Northamptonshire, north the finest examples in the kingdom, so chancel, where all are pierced, but that the defect is the more remark- some of them just as narrowly es- able) the great window of the south cape being solid. Sometimes but very transept of which is figured by Sharpe. rarely, and here also in early examples Let the eye follow the tracery bars only, the central circle does not touch which rise from the two central and the supporting circles or lights in the primary monials, till they meet those fillet which describes the figure, but which branch off from the jambs on the only in the outer moulding, so that the opposite side, and let the included fillet, with part at least of the cham- tracery be set aside, and a very dis- fer moulding is repeated. This is the torted arch is the result. Even the 242 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. inferior to that of the more severe geometrical which it sup- planted. The Perpendicular tracery regained its appearance of security and repose, but at the expense of much grace, all the lines being either parallel with the jambs or at right angles to them, and the whole space being filled with parallelograms, in- stead of the fantastic branchings of the Decorated, or the circles of the geometrical tracery. During the whole of the periods here mentioned foliations or cuspings are profusely used, and though they are not of the essence of tracery, they greatly enhance its effect. There are windows of considerable size of the geometrical tracery without a single cusping, composed only of circles touching each other : l but generally the circles are foliated, three, four, five, or more times ; and the same may be said of the spaces in the other styles. But there is this to be observed in the cusps of the geometrical tracery, that they follow the precision of the lines within which they are confined, being almost universally of parts of single circles, not ogeed, or in any way combined with other circles of different diameters and another centre ; and also that like the tracery to which they are subordinated, the circles never cut but only touch one another. Indeed this precision and non- interference of parts is so great that except the monials of the great lights, the elevation of every part of a window, arch, tra- cery, cuspings, mouldings, and all, may be described with the compasses only, working each line from a single fixed centre. splendid east windows of Sleaford and Selby, (see Sharpe's Parallels,) are not quite free from the like defects. Ex- amples of perfection of form are hap- pily more frequent in fine buildings. As for instance the two-light west window at Hedon, the three-light north aisle window in the same church, that of four lights, north chancel at Nantwich : those of five lights east of south aisle, Hull, and east chancel, Yaxley, Huntingdonshire. And above all the great window of nine lights at Carlisle. All these examples are figured by Sharpe. 1 In the east window of Raunds in Northamptonshire, there are seven circles without a single foliation, though an early style of cusping, to be mentioned presently, occurs in the heads of the six great lights. In the still more remarkable one at the west of the north aisle, Grantham, there are fourteen circles, equally with- out cusps, unless the seven circles within the great central circle can be called its cusps, and the six in the heads of the lights, the cusps of arches in which they are contained. The to- tal height of the window is thirty - seven feet six inches, the total width twenty- one feet six inches. — Sharpe. THE PERIOD OF GEOMETRICAL TRACERY. 243 In describing tracery and cusping, it is frequently necessary to mention the several suites or orders of mouldings of which they are composed, and it may be worth while to pursue these features, small as they are in the space that they occupy, but infinite almost in their use and variety, through their several characters. The simplest monial or tracery bar that can be employed, or even conceived, is a plain rectangular block or post of stone. Such may still be seen in the stone cottages in the West Riding of Yorkshire, but nowhere does it remain, so far as I know, in any ecclesiastical building however rude. Even of this, however, we have a memorial in the Hat part, next the glass, in a peculiar form of monial, sometimes seen in very early Geometric win- dows : but an additional order is always placed upon it. 1 As this construction however was soon utterly abandoned as it deserved to be, I shall leave it quite out of the question for the future, and pass to the next simplest form, which was re- tained so long as tracery lasted, and is found in combination with other forms even in the most elaborate suites of mouldings. This simplest and most important monial has a rectangular section, with the edges chamfered, leaving a narrow fillet out- wards, which, when the monials and tracery bars are thus simple, describes the pattern of the window. This section is varied in three ways : the first and most common is by substituting a hollow for a plain chamfer. The second is by giving an ogee form to the chamfer, 2 the third, which is peculiar so far as I have observed to early Decorated, is called the channelled cham- fer, and is formed by cutting out a hollow in the chamfer with receding angles instead of a receding curve. 3 But all these in 1 See the north chancel window of Warmington, Northamptonshire, (Sharpe) the first edge or fillet next the glass, in the two lights, is the square-edged monial to which I allude. The effect is always peculiar, and generally heavy and very flat, for the second or outer order of the monial is sufficient for solidity and effect, and the lower one appears a needless addi- tion to its width. The monial of the two-light west windows of the south aisle at Church Langton, in Leicester- shire, is ten inches in width, the lights heing only sixteen inches each. 2 The whole suite then becomes a double ressant with a fillet. 3 For plain chamfer, see south chan- cel window, Oundle. For the hollowed chamfer, Carmel, Lancashire, south aisle of choir. For the double ressant with a fillet, Yaxley, Huntingdonshire, 2 244 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. principle resolve themselves into a chamfered rectangle, and are so treated in composition. Where this occurs once only in the monial, and tracery bars, and it is carried through them all, the window is said to have one order of mouldings. Perhaps it should be added, that the hollowed chamfer has a remarkable importance as being the only moulding which is ordinarily made to carry ornaments in the Decorated and Perpendicular styles : it is in this that the ball-flower of the fourteenth, and the four-leaved flower of the fifteenth century so frequently occur. 1 Where the tracery is at all elaborate, a subordination of the several parts is needed, 2 and this is effected by giving to the jambs and monials, or perhaps to some of the monials only, and to some of the tracery bars, an additional order of mouldings. But mouldings are accidents only of which the monials are the substance. This is effected therefore by reduplicating the mo- nials, by setting a smaller one upon a larger, so to speak, and then moulding the edges of both, leaving however a fillet free in the external surface of each. And now the fillet of the outer moulding describes the greater lines, that of the inner moulding the smaller lines of the tracery, and the whole of the cusping. and for the channelled chamfer, or the angular hollow in the chamfer, Croft, Yorkshire, chancel south side, — all in Sharpe. This last form occurs in Moulton church, Northamptonshire, where it is assigned to the early part of the fourteenth century, by a precept of the Bishop of Lincoln to repair the church, dated 1298 ; and also at Har- leston in the same county, the church of which was built in 1325. 1 The windows of the south aisle of Leominster church, contain three or- ders of mouldings in the jambs, and in addition a fourth order in the cusp- ings : all these are of the hollowed chamfer, and all are filled with ball- flowers. There are no fewer than 820 in each window. — See Sharpe's Parallels. 2 It is however remarkable, that even in some very elaborate windows of the Flowing Decorated there is no subordination in the tracery ; another sign of inferiority in this style. The east window of Ringstead (Sharpe,) has complicated tracery, but one order of mouldings serves for all. This is but one example of many. In the ordinary reticulated tracery this is necessarily the case, and this (as twice at the east end of Higham-Ferrers,) is sometimes carried through the head of a window of five lights. The simple intersecting tracery is also necessarily without sub- ordination of mouldings, and this too may be found in five-light windows, as at the east end of Stanford, Nor- thamptonshire. THE PERIOD OF GEOMETRICAL TRACERY. 245 In like manner a third order is often added, by the same means, and for the same purpose ; a third series of still more subordinate lines of tracery, together with the cuspings, being wrought out of the innermost suite of mouldings. 1 Each of these orders may be varied as the first was : perhaps the most common form for the first is the hollowed chamfer, and for the second and third the ressant with a fillet, but no absolute rule need be attempted for the forms of mouldings in combination. We have hitherto supposed that the external member of the outer suite is a fillet, as it is in a vast majority of cases. But in Geometrical, 2 and again in late Perpendicular tracery, 3 it is sometimes a bowtel ; a form borrowed from the jamb- shafts of the Early English, the effect of which it carries through the whole pattern ; sometimes indeed it is treated as a shaft, and has a capital at the spring of the arch, and a base at the window sill. 4 In a very few instances, the fillet becomes a sharp edge : i.e., the monial is chamfered to a point. This character is found at Hull, and also at Temple Balsall, both Geometrical or very early Decorated. Since these several orders of mouldings grew out of the neces- sity of subordinating and distinguishing the several parts of the tracery and of the cusping, it will follow that where any part of the tracery is of the same order as the cuspings, it will be re- duced in constructive character to a higher species of cusping ; and again, that where the subsidiary monials are of the same order or orders as any part of the tracery, they will be reduced in like manner to the character of tracery ; and even in very rare instances to that of cusping. This may seem a refinement, or even a paradox, but on examination it will be found to be true. 1 For windows with two orders of mouldings I may refer to two from He- don, Yorkshire, and to the east window of Ripon ; for three orders to the Lady Chapel, at Wells, to the great window at Carlisle, and many others figured by Sharpe. 2 Temple Balsall, (Sharpe.) This beautiful chapel deserves a very careful description. Its windows form a glo- rious series of geometrical designs ad- mirably treated, and worked with great precision. 3 At Brington, (chancel) Northamp- tonshire, the date of which is about 1520. 4 As at Whitby north aisle, and Howden, both in Yorkshire. (Sharpe.) 246 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. For instance, the three-light window of the north chancel aisle, Beverley, figured by Mr. Sharpe, has monials and princi- pal tracery of two orders. It has also cuspings and subordinate tracery of one order. Take away the whole of the second order, and you take cuspings and secondary tracery with it. These are of the same relative importance. The primary tracery no more wants the secondary tracery than it wants the cusping, to complete a well-balanced frame-work. The subsidiary tracery is but a higher kind of cusping, and enriches the first pattern on the same principle. Again, in the south chancel window of Claybrook, Leicestershire, also given by Mr. Sharpe, the subsidi- ary tracery is identical with the cuspings in character and in office, and the most unpractised eye in throwing aside the one would throw aside the other. 1 In the east of the founder's chapel, Trent, Somersetshire, the same is the case in a very re- markable degree with all the tracery within the greater lines, and so also in the circles in the windows in Temple Balsall. Indeed in such cases as the latter, the system of triangles in the circles is at once referred to cusping, in its spirit and office, though it may be more convenient to call it tracery. The instances in which the monials become part of the tracery are most frequent in large and very complicated windows, though by no means confined to them. In the south transept of Howden a perfect two-light window with a circle in the head, is converted into a four-light window with appropriate tracery and cuspings, by the addition of se- condary monials, of the same suite with the subordinate tracery. In the Lady Chapel, Wells, the secondary monials are of the same suites with the secondary tracery ; the tertiary tracery being of the same suite with the cuspings. In the east window of Ripon Minster, the great circle is of the same orders with 1 This window exemplifies some of the peculiar defects of Decorated tracery , and I shall therefore give Mr. Sharpe' s description of it. "It is not often that a three-light window is found to have all its lights of equal height ; the manner in which this is accomplished in the present example constitutes its peculiarity. Although this design is, on the whole, not inelegant, this arrangement and the manner in which the interstitial spaces thus occasioned are filled up, exhibit the difficulty of preserving this equality in a window, the head of which is filled with flowing tracery." THE PERIOD OF GEOMETRICAL TRACERY. 247 the primary monials ; the small circles with the secondary mo- nials, which would be removed with them, and in fact are a part of the same system of tracery. In the windows of the south aisle of Sleaford, which are of a more advanced character, this cohesion of the secondary monials with the secondary tracery is very striking, and perhaps it is even more so in the north aisle of Whitby. 1 The cases are very extreme in principle, (indeed they are al- most abnormal,) and of very rare occurrence, in which the mo- nials can at all be referred to the cusping, and before we adduce them we must advert to a very peculiar style of cusping not un- common in early geometrical tracery. The most perfect cusping takes with it the last suite of mould- ings, and the most ordinary takes a part of the chamfer of the last suite of mouldings. There is, however, a kind of cusping which drops from the soffit plane of the tracery, and forms another order of mouldings for itself. Of this drop cusping, as I shall call it, there is a fine example in the heads of the lights, and in the smaller circles of the east window of Bipon Minster : smaller examples are sufficiently obvious. Now this cusping, like the more ordinary cusping, sometimes runs into a subsidiary tracery, and even lets fall its own monials, which become drop tracery and drop monials. This is the case with the secondary tracery, elaborate and highly ornamented as it is, and with the secondary monials equally rich, though very much attenuated by the very condition of their existence, in the windows already re- ferred to in the south aisle of Leominster. Here the primary monials and tracery carry on the last suite of jamb mouldings, the secondary tracery and monials drop from the soffit of the primary tracery, and rest on the soffit of the window sill. 2 There are other parts of a building besides the windows which owe much of their decorations to the same forms of which the windows themselves are actually composed, and in these we 1 All figured by Sharpe. ing afforded examples of every kind of 2 Sharpe. The abundant use here tracery, cuspings, and mouldings which made of this elegant and useful series, I had to adduce within the Decorated recmires a special acknowledgment. and Geometric periods in a somewhat The judgment with which the examples elaborate discussion of the subject, are chosen is manifest from their hav- 248 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. have the tracery of the time repeated. Thus in the triforium arcade we have a series of arches relieved by the same tracery and cuspings with the windows, and in the panellings of plain surfaces the orbs or compartments are in fact mere blank designs of windows, in all their parts. And it should be observed that the introduction of tracery wrought a change, not only in the detail, but in the principle of these decorations. So long as the Norman style continued, and so long as the Early English was without tracery, large surfaces of wall were enriched by arcades or pillars and arches actually standing out from the wall ; but with tracery came panelling, — a far lighter and more manage- able decoration, — and this appears very early, as for instance in the west front of Salisbury, where the panelling is of geometric tracery, while the windows are still plain lancets. In the later Perpendicular, panelling was carried to excess, but still few new forms were struck out, the tracery of the windows being almost invariably servilely followed in every work whether of wood or stone. What we have said of the introduction of the pointed arch, is in some degree true of the free use of tracery, which followed so shortly upon it : its results are not to be stated by a mere description of a lancet window or a combination of lancets, as compared with a Decorated or Perpendicular window of equal beauty in its kind. Not only the windows of King's College differ from simple lancets, but the building itself is far other than it would have been had there not been another element in- troduced into the composition. The lantern-like lightness of the chapter-house at York, of the choir clerestory at Norwich, and the whole of S. George's or Henry VII.'s Chapel, is to be traced in all justice to those who filled the first window-head with circles. Among the works in which the history of the Geometrical style is embodied, we shall necessarily mention many which are usu- ally styled pure Early English, and indeed which are so, both in date and in character, except for the intermixture of geometrical tracery with the simple forms of the lancet style. Thus we have already found geometrical panelling in the west front of Salis- bury. Geometrical triforium arcades occur at Westminster, and in both the transepts of York. But in the chapter-house at THE PERIOD OF GEOMETRICAL TRACERY. 249 York the accessories especially the buttresses, become rather Decorated in character. The architect, proud of his successful work, inscribed this building with the legend, " £&t rosa flos florum sic est ttomus tsta tJomorum." And well is the boast realized. Rickman justly speaks of its exquisite beauty, and says, " This chapter-house is by far the finest polygonal room without a central pier in the kingdom, and the delicacy and variety of its details are nearly unequalled." To this we must add as a link in the history of arts, that the roof is of wood, a material which we shall find employed at Ely in vaulting a large space by Alan of Walsingham in the next century, and that the original painted glass is of extreme beauty. To proceed to the history of churches. There are few ecclesiastical edifices which exceed that of the Cistercian monastery of S. Mary, of Vale Royal, in Cheshire, in the interest attached to their foundation. Prince Edward, eldest son of Henry ITL, and afterwards King Edward I., on his return from the Holy Land, was nearly lost in a dreadful storm, when he made a vow to the Blessed Virgin, that if he escaped, he would found a convent for a hundred Cistercian monks. The vessel righted itself, and was brought into port ; the prince landed last ; immediately the ship went to pieces, and disap- peared in the waters. Afterwards, when a prisoner of the rebel- lious barons, Prince Edward received much kindness from the monks of Dore Abbey, and he was induced to select them as the tenants of his promised foundation. Accordingly, in 1273 a colony of this house was removed to Dernhall, and thence to Vale Royal, the original name of which had been Quetenue Hale- was, and Menechene, two names which the chronicler of Vale Royal interprets into " Sanctorum frumentum," and " monacho- rum sylva," and finds in them presages of the sacred use to which it was to be appropriated. Nor were there wanting other signs of the future sanctity of the place ; for ages before the building of the monastery, on the festival of the Virgin, amidst the solitude that then reigned on its future site, tradition affirmed that the shepherds had heard music, and celestial voices, and the sound of bells, and had seen a radiance that 250 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. changed the darkness into day, and visions of a sacred pile not yet commenced. The first stone was laid by Edward in per- son, August 2, 1277 ; Queen Eleanor laid two stones, one for herself, the other for her son Alphonso : many nobles then present also laid stones for themselves, and Robert Burnell, 1 Bishop of Bath and Wells, and Chancellor of England, joined the Bishop of S. Asaph in the celebration of high mass. When the fabric thus commenced was completed, old people believed that they recognized the design as a vision of their youth, having often seen the holy pile, from turret to foundation stone, glittering in the night, with a miraculous illumination, visible to the rest of the country at a surprising distance. The first four abbots resided in a temporary edifice while the abbey was in progress, and on the Feast of the Assumption, 1330, after the expenditure of thirty- two thousand pounds, the monks entered their new residence. Not a trace, except a few doorways to the offices of a more recent house, remains of this splendid pile. 2 The choir of Merton College, Oxford, must be placed before 1277, in which year Walter de Merton, the founder of the col- lege and the builder of the choir, was drowned in crossing a river. The mouldings are still very Early English, and the but- tresses, to which character owes so much, are far more of that style than those of the chapter-house at York, though the tracery has made some advances in the combination of geometrical forms. Perhaps, indeed, we may refer to about this time the introduction, to which allusion has been already made, of tri- angles as subordinate to the general lines of tracery, and almost taking the place of cuspings 3 to the circles into which they are introduced. Of this arrangement the central circle in the head of each window of Merton is a fair example. We have some- thing the same in S. Nicholas' church, Guildford, and in the 1 This Prelate was himself a muni- ficent man and a great ecclesiastical architect. Did he design the work in the commencement of which he then took part ? 2 The account of Vale Royal Abbey is from Ormerod's Cheshire, vol. ii. 3 The use of spherical triangles for tracery, as in the Lady Chapel at Wells, presently to be noticed, is very different from this introduction of triangles within the main lines of the tracery. THE PERIOD OF GEOMETRICAL TRACERY. 251 Bishop of Winchester's palace, Southwark, both ascribed in the Glossary of Architecture to about 1280. It may be doubtful how far the principle of symbolism influenced this use of tri- angles within circles. However, it belongs to this style, chiefly if not exclusively. The choir of Ripon Minster owes a great part of its beauty to the great east window 1 with its Geometri- cal tracery, of which the history, I believe, is not known. The Cathedral of Exeter is very rich in geometrical tracery, having been commenced in 1280 by Bishop Quivil, and carried on by his successors, Thomas Bytton and Walter Stapleton, until the reign of the full flowing Decorated. The east end of Lincoln is a glorious specimen of the same style, as well as portions of Lichfield Cathedral. The Lady Chapel of Wells, the work of Bishop William Bytton, brother to the prelate already mentioned as continuing Exeter Cathedral, is in the same style, but the tracery is in spherical triangles instead of in circles ; and the chapter-house at Wells, built in the time of Bishop William de la March (1293—1302), and " by the contributions of well- disposed people," is among the most beautiful fabrics in the kingdom. This last is the latest work of any consequence that can at all be referred to this style. Among edifices whose history is only inferred from their architectural features, perhaps one of the most beautiful of this date and character is the Church of Tem- ple Balsall, in Warwickshire, formerly the chapel of a preceptory of Knights Templars, from whom the parish has part of its name. In this chapel there are windows of not fewer than eight different patterns, each of three, four, or five lights, and one a rose window of sixteen compartments. In all these the geo- metrical tracery is carried to the highest stage of perfection. In one only there are spherical triangles, but these are filled with circles. They are the latest characteristics of the whole build- ing, all else (i. e., of the original fabric,) being rather Early English than Decorated in the mouldings and other details. 2 Of our greater monasteries, now in ruins, there are few which 1 Figured in Sharpe's series of De- corated Windows. 2 I am glad to be able to state that this splendid example of Geometrical Early English is in the hands of Mr. Scott. 252 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. do not exhibit some large and beautiful portions of this style. The chief of these may be studied with great pleasure and profit in Mr. Sharpens " Architectural Parallels," a work which combines in a very high degree the technical precision, without which it would be useless to the architect, with an elegance and artistic character, by which it will be recommended to every person of taste. The drawings of Tintern are perhaps the most valuable as examples of the geometrical period. Those of Guisborough, a ruin inconsiderable in extent, in a district of Yorkshire seldom visited, may be referred to as giving perhaps the earliest tri- forium, treated after the same manner which became universal with the flowing Decorated ; not, that is, as an arcade of distinct arches, but as a continuation of the composition of the clere- story. I shall conclude this chapter w T ith a reference to one of the most interesting groups of buildings in the kingdom. The crosses of Queen Eleanor are not less important for their histo- rical association, than for their value as examples of ecclesiastical art, and they have the additional value to the student of Gothic architecture, as forming a happy link in his memoria technica, for their date is fixed by the death of Queen Eleanor, and they are decided examples of the Transitional character which the Geometrical style at last admitted. Thus commenced about the middle of the thirteenth century, and ended with the crosses of Queen Eleanor, (1292) or possibly a little later, a distinct style, neither Early English nor Deco- rated, but coincident for a long time with the pure and simple Early English, and for a shorter time with Decorated no less pure, and decided, and partaking during its course, of the mould- ings and accessories of either style respectively. I cannot leave this style without expressing a regret, that even the fascinating forms of the Flowing Decorated were permitted to usurp the place of its Geometric tracery. 253 CHAPTER XIV. Sculpture and Carving, as Decorations of Ecclesias- tical Architecture. General character of Norman Sculpture : The Fonts of East Meon, and of Lenton ; the Doorways of Rochester and of Malmsbury. — Early English Sculpture. — Doorway of Hicham Ferrers. — Introduction of " alto relievo." — West front of Wells. — Effigies of Henry III. and of Queen Eleanor. — Monuments of Robert Vere, of Aymer de Valence, and of Edward II. — Lord Lindsay on the Sculpture of this Age. — Screen in Edward the Confessor's Chapel. — Effigies of Henry VII., and of Elizabeth his Queen. — Introduction of the Pagan Element. — All grace, and all Religious feeling lost in the Reign of Elizabeth. — Monument of Sir Christopher Hatton. — The Pagan Element again introduced, without any compen- sation, AFTER THE REVOLUTION. TOMBS OF EARL STANHOPE, OF General Fleming, and of Dr. Hales. — Comparison of the Monuments of General Wolfe, and of Aymer de Valence. — Sepulchral Crosses at Jervaulx, at Tickhill, and at Laugh- ton-en-le-morthen. — other carved tombs. brasses. — john Bloxam, at Great Addington ; a Priest at Wensley ; the Pa- rents of Archbishop Chichele. — Dean Eyre ; — Robert Brannel ; — John Selwyn. — Wood Carving. — Early Specimens ; most used in the Fifteenth Century. — Grinling Gibbons. — Stalls at Wensley, and at S. Nicholas, Lynn. — Grotesques. We have now arrived very nearly at the culminating point of ecclesiastical architecture, and other arts which followed in her orbit, have kept pace with the ars regina, so that now the most splendid buildings have also the most splendid adornments of painting and sculpture. Let us here, therefore, review the progress of the decorative arts, as applied to ecclesiastical archi- tecture. The most common material of sculpture is so well adapted to resist the effects of time, and in some degree of violence also, that we have very considerable traces of the Norman, and some 254 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. few of the Saxon chisel. The latter perhaps differ more in rude- ness of execution than in design from the former j 1 and yet nothing can well be ruder than much of the early Norman carving. Drawing, grouping and design are all terms too significant of advancement for their ruder works. Groups of men and beasts, of all degrees of deformity, often accompanied with trees and foliage still less true to nature, are sketched out in mere surface carving, and imaginary monsters 2 alternate with figures intended to represent some real object in strange confusion. Repose, either in the obvious or in the artistic mean- ing of the word, is a stranger to Norman art even in its higher forms : there is not sufficient harmony of composition for artistic repose ; and repose of action is contrary to the spirit of the people and of the times. Even their religion was one of strong contending oppositions. Christianity habitually pre- sented itself to the Normans, as a struggle against evil powers, rather than as a rest into which we have entered. If both views are true, (as indeed they are in due mutual subordination) the Norman seized upon that most strongly which most harmonized with his national character, which was all action, and much of the action that of violence and strife. 3 A like zeal was put forth in the contest with all difficulties ; and in the hands of a persevering and active generation, sculp- ture continued to advance. Gervase in his history of the burn- 1 The monumental stone of the mar- tyrs, at Peterborough, slain by Hubba, in 775, is said to be Saxon, by some competent authorities, but its charac- ter seems to me to be wholly Norman. 2 Serpents, salamanders, and cen- taurs, are the most frequent imaginary animals ; Serpents usually signify the devil, and his spirits, and are repre- sented combating with the Christian, or trying to devour a woman, the em- blem of the Church. Salamanders occur on fonts in allusion to the words, He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost, and with fire.— The centaur was a badge of Stephen, and where it occurs (as at Adel, Yorkshire,) it is supposed to indicate the date of the structure. 3 There is an exceedingly character- istic, and a very good example of Nor- man carving in the comparatively modern north porch of Hallaton church, Leicestershire. It was origi- ginally the tympanum of a door. The subject is S. Michael contending with the great Dragon, in behalf of the souls of men, several of which the Archangel who is winged, on horse- back, bears in his bosom, while others are kneeling in terror supplicating his help. The composition and drawing are very superior to most Norman sculptures. SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 255 ing and rebuilding of the Cathedral of Canterbury, late in the twelfth century, tells us how the old capitals were plain, the new ones most artistically sculptured. The old arches, and every thing else either plain, or sculptured with an axe and not with a chisel, but in the new work first-rate sculpture abounded everywhere. 1 Still, however, the figures were grotesque and the groupings inartificial : but we must not suppose that there was not real splendour, as well as what would then be called splendour in such decorations. The profusion of such rude or- naments produces a very rich effect, and though when we judge of it as sculpture, we must condemn it altogether ; yet when we speak of it as secondary to the fabric which it adorns, we cannot withhold our admiration. A very rapid description of some of the remains of Norman art, in which this richness of aggregation is most remarkable, will fully bear out this estimate, both of the style and of the general effect of the sculpture of this age. The first that I shall adduce shall be one or two fonts, for the Normans often lavished all their arts on this instrument of a Divine ordinance. The font of East Meon, 2 in Hampshire, is occupied on two sides by an arcade of semicircular arches, with a border of animals above it ; and on the two remaining sides with the creation of Adam and Eve, the Temptation, the Expulsion from Paradise, (which is represented as a church or palace,) and the Almighty instructing the fallen pair in the method of tilling the ground. The font of Lenton, in Nottinghamshire, (figured and de- scribed in Van Voorst's, series of fonts,) is covered in every part with elaborate sculpture. On one side is the Crucifixion ; the figure of our Saviour occupying a large cross, which branches, and is foliated over the whole surface ; while the two malefactors are on smaller crosses at the base, with the soldier piercing our Saviour's side ; and above are angels waving their censers out of Heaven, in adoration of their Crucified Lord. The relative sizes of the figures are remarkable, as indicating a principle of mediaeval art according to which the most important figure was also the largest, and so the most prominent ; an object which is attained in the higher art of later times by grouping in its 1 Willis, p. 86. 2 Figured in Vol. X. of the Archaeologia. 256 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. highest sense. Another side is filled with figures of angels and cherubim under the several arches of two arcades, the one over the other, and in a larger central space at the bottom is a repre- sentation of the Taking down from the Cross. One of the other two sides is filled with a large cross of ornamental foliage, and the other is divided into four compartments, each containing a subject from Scripture. The parts not occupied with these subjects are filled with ornamental patterns. Thus the whole surface is covered with sculpture, and though each particular figure may be rude, the whole effect is very rich. But the doorways of the Normans were made to receive the greatest share of enrichment ; both, perhaps, on account of that desire so manifest in their arrangements, to which allusion has been before made, to present the richest surface to the approach- ing worshipper ; and also because of the words of our Lord, " I am the Door," consecrating the door for ever as a symbol of His own Person, to which there is plainly an allusion in the figure of our Saviour frequently found in the doorway planes of this style, and in the same relative position in later examples. The west doorway of Rochester is a splendid instance. It is of five concentric arches, or orders, enriched with very elaborate de- vices, and resting on as many banded shafts, with highly wrought capitals. Two of the shafts, however, have a peculiar import- ance here, for above the bands they become statues of King Henry I. and Matilda, his Queen ; the King holding a sceptre in his right hand, and a book in his left, — the Queen holding the charter of the royal endowments to the abbey ; and these (as is truly observed in Winkles 5 Cathedrals, where this door is figured,) are among the very earliest statues in the kingdom. The doorway plane is occupied with a representation of our Saviour, in the attitude of blessing, surrounded by worshipping angels, and holding a book, while below are the Twelve Apostles. But the south door of Malmsbury Abbey is perhaps the most splendid example in the kingdom. I describe it from the beau- tiful elevation in the " Monumenta Antiqua." The outer arch consists of no fewer than eight concentric suites of mouldings, alternately principal and subordinate, the latter having a concave surface, enriched with various Norman forms of foliage, and other characteristic patterns ; the former SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 257 having a convex surface, so as to assume a greater prominence, and composed of groups of figures arranged in oval medallions, bounded by the links of a kind of branching chain-work. These groups represent probably several portions of the histories of the Old and New Testaments. The Presentation of Christ in the Temple, His triumphal Entry into Jerusalem, His Last Supper, His Crucifixion, His Entombment and Resurrection, His Ascension and the Sending of the Holy Ghost, being very apparent on the outer principal suite of mouldings. Of such groups, not fewer than eighty must have adorned this door in its perfect state. The doorway plane of the inner door has upon it the figure of our Lord in a vesica piscis, supported by two angels. 1 As the Early English style approached, the efforts of the sculptor began to arrogate to themselves an individual and sepa- rate beauty. The subjects of the Normans were still in some degree retained, but the execution was greatly improved. The monsters, dragons, and serpents, have more life, and more of what would be called " nature," if the objects themselves were natural, and there is sometimes a force in them almost terrible. 2 Scriptural subjects are still retained in low relief, as in the door- way of Higham Ferrers Church, Northamptonshire, which is adorned with several circles, or medallions, of the following subjects: — 1. The Salutation of SS. Mary and Elizabeth; 2. the Angel appearing to Zacharias ; 3. the Adoration of the Magi; 4. Our Saviour in the Temple; 5. His Baptism; 6. the Angels appearing to the Shepherds ; 7. the Crucifixion ; 8. the Annunciation ; 9. the Disciples at the Sepulchre ; 10. the Descent into Hell. 3 In other cases some legendary history con- nected with the church, or its patron saint, is similarly treated, as the story of S. Guthlac in several medallions in the doorway plane of Croyland Abbey. The foliage of capitals and other 1 The west doorway of the same Abbey-church has more than half perished. It was very rich, though not so elaborate as that above de- scribed. On one of the capitals of the jamb-shafts is the centaur, the cognizance of King Stephen, and usu- ally taken to determine the date to his time. 2 As for example, in the splendid bosses still preserved from the ruins of S. Mary's Abbey, York, where the dragons contending with beasts are terrible in their muscular contortions. 3 See No. I. of the Churches of the Archdeaconry of Northampton. 258 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. ornamental members assumes a character quite its own, instead of the ungainly imitation of the Corinthian capitals, which was the highest effort of Norman sculpture in the representation of foliage. There is still, however, a memorial, at least, of the classic acanthus, in the manner in which the Early English foliage springs from the neck of the pillar, and rises till it curls downwards on reaching the abacus ; but even this character is lost in the next style, and the free foliage entwines the capitals like a wreath, instead of climbing up it like the acanthus of the Greeks. But the greatest stride which sculpture made about the be- ginning of the thirteenth century, was in the use of alto-relievo, instead of the very low relief of the preceding centuries ; and as grouping as well as the forming of separate figures made a pro- portionate advance, the statuary of this age has a very conside- rable degree of merit. The most glorious assemblage of figures and groups in the kingdom is in the west facade of Wells Cathe- dral, some of which have extorted very high praise from the classical Flaxman. 1 1 " Bishop Joceline," says Flaxman, " rebuilt the Cathedral Church of Wells from the pavement ; which having lived to finish and dedicate, he died, in the year of our Lord 1243. " The west front of this church equally testifies the piety and compre- hension of the Bishop's mind ; the sculpture presents the noblest, most useful and interesting subjects possible to be chosen. On the south side, above the west door, are alto-relievos of the Creation, in its different parts, the Deluge, and important acts of the Patriarchs. Companions to these on the north side, are alto-relievos of the principal circumstances of the life of our Saviour. Above these are two rows of statues, larger than nature, in niches, of kings, queens, and nobles, patrons of the church, saints, bishops, and other religious, from its first foun- dation to the reign of Henry III. Near the pediment is our Saviour come to Judgment, attended by Angels and His Twelve Apostles. The upper arches on each side, along the whole of the west front, and continued in the north and south ends, are occupied by figures rising from their graves, strongly expressing the hope, fear, as- tonishment, stupefaction, or despair, inspired by the presence of the Lord and Judge of the world, in that awful moment. " In speaking of the execution of such a work, due regard must be paid to the circumstances under which it was produced, in comparison with those of our own times. There were neither prints, nor printed books to assist the artist ; the sculptor could not be instructed in anatomy, for there were no anatomists. Some knowledge of optics, and a glimmering of per- spective were reserved for the re- searches of so sublime a genius as Roger Bacon, some years afterwards. SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 259 Hitherto, whatever manner is observable, may be attributed chiefly to imperfect skill : it is the manner of the infancy of art. But we soon find occasion to notice the influence of foreign schools on English sculpture ; and with skill in execu- tion, and even in design, came also a mannerism, which is in- separable from that influence of individuals which is the origin of a school, and which in some degree neutralizes the benefit of derived excellence. There is a conventional grace of posture, especially in the carriage of the head, observable henceforward in single figures ; except, indeed, in the most beautiful class of figures, the recumbent effigies on tombs ; but still there can be no question that the art of sculpture advanced on the whole until the reign of the second Tudor, from which time we may date the decadence of all ecclesiastical art. It would be too long to mention any fair proportion of the more remarkable sculptures from the middle of the thirteenth to the close of the fifteenth century : a very small list may serve to indicate the progress of the art. The effigy of Henry III., and of Eleanor, queen of Edward I. in Westminster Abbey, are by an Englishman, William Tozel, and the statues on the Queen's crosses are also of native work- manship. And in all these there is a very great degree of ma- jesty and beauty, such as could only be produced in times of real and high art. In 1296, we have the monument of Robert Vere, fifth Earl of Oxford, at Earl's Colne, in Essex, the sides of which are richly decorated with figures in niches. In 1308 occurs the very beautiful tomb of Aymer de Valence, Earl of Pembroke, in Westminster Abbey ; and in 1334, the monument of Edward II. in Gloucester Cathedral. 1 To the monument of this prince the Abbey of Gloucester was greatly indebted ; for when the Abbeys of Bristol, Keynsham, and Malmsbury had A small knowledge of geometry and and much of the sculpture is rude and mechanics was exclusively confined to severe ; yet, in parts, there is a beau- two or three learned monks in the tiful simplicity, an irresistible senti- whole country ; and the principles of ment, and sometimes a grace, excelling those sciences, as applied to the figure more modern productions." and motion of man and inferior ani- 1 This exquisite monument is well mals, were known to none. figured in the plans, &c. of Gloucester " Therefore this work is necessarily Cathedral, published by the Society of ill drawn, and deficient in principle, Antiquaries. s 2 260 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. refused to receive the royal corpse, Abbot Tkokey covered it with a pall, enriched with the arms of the abbey, and carried it from Berkeley Castle to Gloucester, where it was buried with be- coming magnificence. This act of loyalty and duty was amply repaid, not only by Edward III., but by the offerings of many pilgrims, which amounted to so large a sum, that after a while the whole church was nearly rebuilt with it. "Sculpture from henceforth flourished in England," says Lord Lindsay. 1 "Edward III. was an especial patron of the arts, bishops and chapters vied with each other in decorating their churches, and this lasted during the whole of the fourteenth, and the early years of the fifteenth century. The statues of the kings and queens on the screens in the cathedrals of Canterbury and Exeter ; the recumbent figures of Edward III. and of Queen Philippa, in Westminster Abbey, the head of the former almost ideal in its beauty, the drapery in both flowing and free ; the tomb of Henry V. also there ; the series of kings from the Conqueror to Henry V. in the Cathedral of York, the tomb of Richard Earl of Warwick, in the interesting chapel of the Beau- champs, and many others, belong to this period. But the reign of Henry VI. witnessed a change, and from the death of the hero of Agincourt downwards, the art declined, till Henry VIII. introduced the Italian style of the cinquecento." 2 Westminster Abbey, to which reference has already been made more than once, contains so many and various sculptures each in the perfection of the beauty or deformity of their respective times, that a history of ecclesiastical sculpture from the reign of Henry III. to the present day might be fairly illustrated from the stores of that church alone. Among the most remarkable 1 Sketches of Christian Art, iii. 252. 9 A striking instance of the contrast between the beauty of the Gothic sculpture, and the barbarity of that introduced by Henry VIII. when ap- plied to the same subjects, is found in the cross erected at Bristol during the reign of Edward III., and containing statues of that monarch, and of his Queen Philippa, to which have been added figures of Henry VIII. and of Queen Elizabeth, in all their grotesque costume, equally removed from the classic and the Gothic beauty which adorns each its appropriate subjects. The history of this cross is singular enough to be mentioned here. It was taken down and re-erected in the Ca- thedral, again taken down, and at length purchased by Sir Richard Colt Hoare, and now adorns the grounds at Stourhead House, Wiltshire. SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 261 are the decorations of the screen of Edward the Confessor's chapel, and especially the fourteen alto-relievos which are con- tinued along the upper part of it, in which the history of the royal saint is represented, according to the legend of his life and miracles by Ailred, which was presented by Abbot Laurence to Henry II. on the day of the translation of Edward's relics to his new shrine. 1 (1.) The first compartment represents the prelates and nobility swearing fealty to the Confessor, when in his mother's womb. The Queen stands in the midst of the assem- bled nobles, with her left hand upon her waist, and occupies her most important position with becoming dignity. (2.) The next subject is the birth of the Confessor. (3.) The third his corona- tion. (4.) Then follows his vision of the devil dancing upon the money collected as Danegelt, which led him to remit that most unpopular tax. (5.) Then Edward's generous conduct to the thief who was purloining his treasure : the King raises him- self on his elbow in bed, while the thief is kneeling at the open hanaper, to which he has just returned for the third time. " You are too covetous, youth," the legend makes the King to exclaim, who had seen the whole theft, " take what you have, and fly ; if Hugoline (the chamberlain) come, he will not leave you a single doit." The thief, who thought the King had been asleep, fled without being pursued, and when Hugoline discovered the loss, the King soothed his fear and passion, saying, " Perhaps he needed it more than me ; and he has left sufficient for us." (6.) In the sixth compartment is represented an appearance of our Saviour to King Edward, when he was partaking of the Holy Eucharist. (7.) The seventh is the vision of Edward, in which he beheld the drowning of the King of Denmark, who was pre- paring to invade the kingdom. (8.) Then follows the quarrel between Tosti and Harold when children at the King's table ; from which, according to the legend, the prophetic mind of Ed- ward presaged the future character and fate of the two noble youths. (9.) The ninth subject is one of the most picturesque of the ancient legends, and is not badly rendered in the language of sculpture. In the Decian persecution (about 250,) seven Christian youths of Ephesus fled into a cave under Mount 1 See plates and description in Neale's Westminster Abbey, 262 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Celion to avoid death, and having committed themselves to God, fell asleep. The Emperor stopped the mouth of the cave with stones, which were not removed till the year 479, when the youths arose, and thinking that they had slept but one night, despatched one of their number into the city to purchase bread, for which he offered a coin of Decius in payment, which led to the discovery of the sleepers. They were permitted only to warn Theodosius, who then wore the purple, of the certainty of the Resurrection, when they again fell asleep, " and even to this day/' says Gregory of Tours, " they slumber in the very same place." Gregory lived in the sixth century, and the seven youths were destined to sleep for five centuries more. The Confessor was observed to smile at the Eucharist one Easter day. He told his attendants afterwards that he had been transported in vision to the city of Ephesus, and to Mount Celion, and had there seen the seven sleepers in their cave. Letters were despatched to the Emperor of Constantinople, giving an account of this vision, and the messengers being taken to the cave, the sleepers were found as Edward had described. In the sculpture the messen- gers are seen on horseback arriving at the cave, and the sleepers are discovered lying on their left sides, as they had appeared to Edward in the vision. (10.) In the tenth compartment, the Confessor having already emptied his purse in almsgiving, gives his ring to S. John the Evangelist, who appears before him as a beggar, while he is engaged in the consecration of a church. (12.) In the twelfth, S. John delivers the ring, with a message to Edward, to two pilgrims, who, (13,) in the thirteenth, return it again to the King. (11.) In the eleventh compartment, blind men are restored to sight by washing in the same water into which the King has dipped his hands ; and (14) in the last, the Confessor dedicates his church : — that very Westminster Abbey which he but just lived to finish, in which he was buried, within the vast confines of which he was twice translated, which Henry III., in reverence to his sainted predecessor, rebuilt, and which Henry VI. adorned with further tokens of pious veneration, among which was in all probability the very screen we are de- scribing. The lower part of the screen, along the frieze of which these subjects arc carved, is of very rich tabernacle-work ; the several SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 263 niches were once occupied with statues, and the whole design must have been exceedingly gorgeous. The several groups above enumerated tell their tale as well as they could do in the hands of the most celebrated artists, and they are by no means deficient in grouping and harmony of effect. The principal figures are about a foot high. All delicacy of finish is lost from the violence which the screen has suffered ; but it would be un- reasonable to doubt that in this respect it was equal to the elaborateness and skill of the design. With respect to the subjects, they must not of course be taken as historically true, but they have another kind of truth which is artistically and even intellectually higher than historic truth : they are in their true place, they are told in the spirit of truth, they are true many of them according to the eternal standard of moral truth, and even historically and theologically they are true according to the notion of the times when they were designed ; and in every respect they are in full keeping with their place and purpose. We now turn to a very different example of art. With the exception of the recumbent figures themselves, which retain the clasped hands, and general repose of character of the old monu- mental effigies, no parts of the elaborate monument of Henry VII., and Elizabeth his queen deserve one syllable of this praise. It is needless to say that they are placed in that most gorgeous effort of architectural design, Henry the Seventh's chapel, and that they are yet more closely enshrined by worthy and elabo- rate brazen tabernacle work, in which the character of the cha- pel is preserved. The artificer of this tomb was a Florentine graver and painter, named Torrigiano, or as he is called in the indenture of covenant for the work, Peter Torrisany : but though a foreigner he could not plead ignorance of character of the build- ing in which his work was to be placed, for the same instrument described him as " now being resident in the precincts of Saint Peter of Westminster/ 5 and the chapel was then nearly finished, and the "closure" or shrine of brass at least well advanced. But if the king, when he provided for his monument in his will, hoped that it would be erected in accordance with the style which he had himself adopted in his own foundations, he was sorely deceived. The tomb is principally of black marble, (or 264 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. touch, as it used to be called,) but the figures and alto-relievos are of copper gilt. All this is in accordance with the will of Henry, 1 but certainly nothing could be farther from his concep- tion than the pagan-like medallions of figures on the sides of the tomb, when he ordered that in the sides and both ends of the same tomb, tabernacles should be graven, and the same to be 1 This document is so much to our present purpose that I transcribe part of it. " Howbeit I am a synfull crea- ture, in synne conceivied, and in synne have lived, knowing p'fitely that of my merits I cannot atteyne to the lif eu'rlasting, but oonly by the merits of thy blessed passion and of thi infinite m'cy and grace, Nathelesse my moost m'ciful Redemer, Maker, and Salviour, I trust that by thi special grace and m'cy of the moost blissed moder euir Virgyne, oure lady saincte Mary, in whom after the, in this mortall lif hath eu'rbeen my moost singulier trust and confidence, To whom in al my neces- sities I have made my continuel refuge, and by whom I have hiderto in al myne adu'rsities eu'r had my sp'ial comforte and relief, wol nowe in my moost extreme nede, of her infinite pitie take my soule into her hands, and it p'sent vnto her moost dere Son : Whereof swettest lady of m'cy veray moder and virgin, Welle of pitie and surest refuge of al nedefull, moost hum- bly, moost entierly, and moost hertely I beseche the : And for my comforte in this behalve, I trust also to the singuler mediacions and praiers of all the holie companie of heven ; that is to saye, Aungels, Archaungels, patri- arches, prophets, apostels, eu'ngelists, martirs, confessours, and virgyns, and sp'ially to myne accustumed avoures I calle and crie, Sainct Michaell, Sainct John Baptist, Saint John Eu'ngelist, saint George, saint Anthony, sainct Edward, saint Vincent, saint Anne, saint Marie Magdalene, and Saint Bar- bara, humbly besechingyou not oonly at the houre of dethe, soo to aide, soccour and defende me, that the auncient and gostely enemye ner noon other euill or dampnable esprite, haue no powar to invade me, ner with his terriblenesse to annoye me ; but also with your holie praiers, to be intercessours and medi- atours vnto our Maker and Redemer, for the remission of my synnes and saluacion of my soule. " And we wol that our Towmbe bee in the myddes of the same Chapell, before the high Aultier, in such dis- taunce from the same as it is ordred in the plat made for the same Chapell, and signed with our hande : In which place we Wol, that for the said sepul- ture of vs and our derest late wif the Quene whose soule God p'donne, be made a Towmbe of Stone called touche, sufficient in largieur for vs booth : And upon the same, oon ymage of our figure, and an other of hers, either of them of copure and gilte, of suche faction, and in suche maner, as shalbe thought moost con- uenient by the discrecion of our exe- cutors, yf it be not before doon by our self in our daies. And in the borders of the same towmbe, be made a conuenient scripture, conteignyng the years of our reigne, and the daie and yere of our decesse. And in the sides, and booth ends of our said towmbe, in the said touche vnder the said bordure, wee Wol tabernacles bee graven, and the same to be filled with Ymages, sp'cially of our said avouries, of coper and gilte." SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 265 filled with images of his especial avowries or patron saints, whom he had mentioned at the beginning of his will. The figures in- deed are there, but instead of the " tabernacles" beneath which they were to be placed, the tomb is divided into the requisite number of compartments by Grecian pilasters covered with ara- besque foliage ; and the figures are contained in medallions sur- rounded with a Roman civic wreath : and there, instead of kneeling to pray for the deceased, or standing to bless or to guard him, in the habit or with the symbols of sanctity in which they had ever appeared to his mind's eye, and which were at least Christian and characteristic, they stand most unmoved spectacles, to spectators equally unmoved. Instead of bending beneath the mystic weight of The unknown Child, and lean- ing a giant's weight on the uptorn pine tree which supports him, S. Christopher is a respectable Roman citizen carrying an infant on his shoulders with some affection, and much affectation, and holding up a branch of whitethorn to amuse him. S. George is a swaggering soldier in the accoutrements of the em- pire, telling the story of one of his victories to S. Anthony and his pig. Even the Blessed Virgin with the Holy Child could never be taken elsewhere, for that dearest and happiest creation of Christian art : in the compartment in which she ap- pears with S. Michael she is a pagan Tellus, or Latona, or some matron showing her child to a distant relation. At the four corners are perched as many winged Cupids who once held the scales and sword of justice, the royal banner, and the dragon of Cadwallader, from whom Henry affected to trace his Welsh descent. As these are all stolen and the occupation of the Cupids is gone, they appear at a disadvantage ; but of the whole tomb we may say, (again excepting the recumbent figures) that there is not throughout a trace of Christian costume, or a shade of Christian feeling. This tomb of Henry VII. is one of the first — perhaps quite the first — of any importance in the kingdom, in which the Pagan element so entirely predominates ; and this, be it remembered, is by an artist who brought his principles of design from Italy. 1 1 I shall have occasion by and bye to note a smaller decadence of art in the shrine of Edward the Confessor, and in the tomb of Henry III., by Pietro Cavallmi, also an Italian. 266 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. I confess my joy and pride, as an Englishman, that the fall of the Teutonic art even in England, in all its forms and applica- tions, is not to be traced to us : and that its revival, or at least its due appreciation in the present day, did not originate beyond the Alps, no nor beyond the seas. It must be admitted, however, that whatever was barbarous, and whatever was unchristian in art, was too readily adopted here. If we held it justifiable to separate Christian religion from Christian art, there is a style which we should account more wretched than even that of revived paganism. Though statuary was not absolutely banished from churches as a mere decoration by the Reformation, yet its use was practically con- fined to monuments ; and these, under Elizabeth and the Stuarts, became barbarous beyond all former example, — we may almost say beyond all antecedent possibility. Still, however, there was an intention to be religious. The worthy alderman and his good wife who kneel, all ruffs and buckram, at the opposite sides of an impossible desk, seem to be praying to one another, but are intended to be praying to God. All the accessaries of their tombs are so hideous, so perfectly harmonious with themselves, that while we look at the death's-head and thigh-bones, balls and pyramids, hour-glass and scythes, cherubs in tears, children peering over one another's heads in ranks of boys and girls to the number of some sixteen or twenty, all in black of the same suit, and then read an epitaph as long as the Iliad and twice as false, we are tempted to doubt whether this could have been the time of Shakspere and Bacon, and a host of men who could not have been what they were in an age of absolute prostration of thought and feeling. Of such monuments perhaps the paragon was that of Sir Christopher Hatton, the same who danced himself into favour with Queen Elizabeth, and into the wool- sack, at a court mumming. It stood between the lady chapel and the south aisle of old S. Paul's Cathedral, and perished in the great fire. It is engraved by Hollar, in Dugdale's History and Antiquities of S. Paul's Cathedral, and I turned to the plate with the intention of describing it, but its hideousness defies description, as its vastness defied mensuration. Of its latter quality Stowc, in his survey of London gives an amusing notice. Sir Philip Sidney and Sir Francis Walsingham were buried near SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 267 the dancing knight, but had no monuments, whereon a merry poet wrote thus; — " Philip and Francis have no tomb For Great Christopher takes all the room." I need hardly add that the allusion is to the Great S. Christopher the mighty giant, — " four-and-twenty feet he was large, and thick and broad enough," — of monkish hagiology. The monuments of this age deserve no longer notice. We may leave them with a regret that as they are sacred, both from the House of God, in which they are erected, and from the pur- pose for which they are designed, it would not be right to destroy them utterly. This can, however, hardly be said, of those which are absolutely unchristian in form and spirit, which arose out of that same revival of pagan art to which we have alluded before, but which did not dare to put itself forth without disguise till the Revolution. Statues of Hercules, Neptune, Minerva, Esculapius and other gods : figures of the Fates twin- ing and cutting the thread of life : l heathen virtues crowned with celestial garlands by heathen deities ; — these and the like subjects can be consecrated by no service to which they are put, and by no place into which they are obtruded. I shall take one or two examples almost at random, from Westminster Abbey. 2 The first Earl Stanhope is a Roman soldier, attended by Minerva, Victory, and Cupid, the latter bearing his shield of arms. 3 A sarcophagus, in itself a covert denial of the resurrec- tion of the body, inscribed with Congreve's name is strown with books, masks, and other emblems of the Drama. At the 1 A recent anecdote connected with this device is not less worthy to be re- corded than the pasquinade on Sir Christopher Hatton's monument. A nobleman had employed a sculptor to restore some of his family monu- ments, among which was one in which the venerable Atropos had just cut the thread of one of his predeces- sors. His grace was startled at being told with well feigned concern, that his estates and titles were no longer his. The furbisher of monuments little dreaming of the mischief he was doing, had pieced the severed thread. 2 Neale's W estminster Abbey is my authority in all these. 3 Proving beyond dispute that he- raldry was not brought into western Europe by the Crusaders. 268 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. base of the monument of General Fleming are, "the figures of Minerva and Hercules, who are employed in binding to the latter' s club a serpent and a glass ; and thus forming a trophy, composed of the emblems of valour, wisdom, and prudence." Stephen Hales, D.D., is represented, " on a large medallion, supported by the figures of Religion and Botany, the former is sitting, and deploring her loss ; the latter holds a cornucopia, and at her feet The Winds are displayed on a globe, in allusion to Dr. Hale's invention of ventilators. A pyramid, surmounted by an urn, composes the back-ground." 1 But the monstrousness of such devices in a Christian church, and as memorials of those who were on earth, and still remain members of Christ, (and what fellowship hath Christ with Belial ?) cannot be justly exposed except by way of contrast. Stand then for a moment before the monument of Aymer de Valence, in the choir of Westminster Abbey, for we still linger among the tombs in that glorious pile. Eight figures, now headless and otherwise mutilated, but originally of exquisite workmanship, stand within as many tabernacles along the side of the tomb : they represent most likely the patron saints of the deceased, some saints they certainly represent, and they sym- bolize too plainly to be mistaken the article of The Communion of Saints. Over the tomb a magnificent canopy is raised in forms of beauty harmonizing with the Gothic piers and arches, beneath which it is erected. The knight on his charger fully caparisoned surmounts the whole, while his arms and those of his nearer relations appear on various parts of the tomb. This would perhaps appear to savour of the vainglorious display which we deprecate when it assumes another form ; but we must re- member that the knight was then known best by his coat armour ; and that emblazoned shields merely tell in the simplest language then in use, the name and title of the deceased. We must also remember, that right or wrong, chivalry, and with it heraldry, was closely interwoven with the Religion of mediaeval knighthood. Not struggling in the battle, not marshalling his troops, not reaching forth to a crown of laurel, or complacently listening to the trumpet of Fame resounding in his ears, but re- 1 The pyramid and the urn are symbols, the one of fire worship, and the other of heathen cremations. SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 269 cumbent, as he might have fallen asleep at the last, with hands closed in prayer, lies the deceased hero ; his feet pressed against a lion in memory of the promise, " the young lion and the dragon thou shalt tread under thy feet," and at his head is a group representing attendant spirits bearing his soul to Abra- ham's bosom. 1 And now raise your eyes, and you will see, beyond the recum- bent figure of Aymer de Valence, another monument of far different character. That too commemorates a hero, and a Christian hero ; it is the monument of General Wolfe. Lest I should be tempted to speak sneeringly, I will borrow the approving words of another, and still I will confidently leave the contrast to produce its proper effect. " It consists of an elevated basement and sarcophagus ; upon which, on a couch under an open tent, is a naked statue of the dying Wolfe, supported by a grenadier, who appears raising him up by the left arm, to receive a laurel wreath, and palm branch from a descending Victory ; bis right hand is placed over the wound in his breast. His habiliments and arms lie scattered near the couch, and beneath his feet is the French flag. In the back-ground is a mourning Highland serjeant ; and on the left, an oak tree, on which are hung tomahawks and scalping-knives. Upon the basement, which projects circularly in the middle, are two gaunt lions, couchant ; and at each end on the flanks, within an oval, is a wolfs head, erased, in low relief. In front, is a singular representation in lead, but bronzed over, of the land- ing of the troops under the Heights of Abraham, with the scaling of the precipices, and advance into action." Now let me observe that this is not an exaggerated specimen of this kind of monument, it is chosen solely for the accident which enables the spectator to compare it, without moving, with that of Aymer de Valence, and if possible to admire both, and if not, to choose which he will admire and which he will condemn. It is well that there are now few who will not choose the Christian before the Pagan memorial, and who will not wonder how it could have been otherwise at any time in a Christian country ; still we have before us a fierce struggle with the pagan element in a 1 This device has been adopted in the cenotaph of the Princess Charlotte in S. George's Chapel, Windsor. 270 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. thousand strange and revolting forms, before the cry will be heard in the temples which we have been erecting for them ever since the coming of the Dutch William, " The gods are de- parting." I must not leave the subject of sculpture without a few words on several classes of monuments which can hardly aspire to so high a rank among works of art as the recumbent effigies in full proportions. The first of these are the foliated crosses of which the numbers still existing, though multitudes have perished, is quite beyond calculation. A very interesting series occupies the nave of the church, and the chapter-house at Jervaulx, and the soil having been suffered to collect over the whole site of this abbey for many generations, has preserved them very perfectly. The whole building is now cleared out, and is a most admirable ecclesiological study. But by far the most beautiful sepulchral crosses of this kind which have come within my notice, are two in the neighbouring churches of S. John Baptist, Laughton-en-le-Morthen, and of Tickhill, in Yorkshire. The first occupies the whole surface of a stone en dos d'dne which it covers with the most perfect foliage and fruit of the vine, in very deep relief. The other is a cross of Calvary flory, of eight rays, with the lamb triumphant in the centre of the cross. A great peculiarity in this tomb leads to the mention of another class of monuments : — out of the side of the stone, above where the right hand of the entombed warrior rested, appears a mailed hand issuing, and grasping a sword, as if to express a military ardour which could not be quenched even by death. I know of no other instance of the hand alone appear- ing: 1 but in the neighbouring churches of Wadworth and Loversall, and also in the far distant churches of Both well and Cotterstock, Northamptonshire, 2 are stones representing the head and clasped hands appearing through an opening at the top, and the feet through an opening at the bottom of the tomb, the in- termediate portion being left plain, perhaps for an inscription. 1 Since this was written I have found in Vol. III. of the Antiquarian Reper- tory, a drawing of a coffin-lid in Rum- sey church, where a female's hand in like manner appears, holding a staff of office. The cross is an ordinary foli- ated cross, of no great elegance. It probably commemorates some Abbess of Rumsey. 2 Also Hambleton, Rutland. SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 271 Whither is this curious design to be referred ? Not to want of art or of liberality ; for besides that the most elaborate parts are given in this instance, the execution seems to have been excellent, and the depth of the carving, the canopy being relieved no less than six inches, indicates no parsimony of time or labour. Per- haps it is intended thus to represent the superincumbent weight of the tomb, together with the continued existence of the spiri- tual and moral faculties ; as if the soul still had feet to walk in the way of life, hands to clasp in prayer, and a head, and a tongue to praise God, while the body, the most carnal part, loses its individuality and energies being under the power of corruption. Sepulchral brasses still remain to be noticed. The designs of brasses evidently originate from the several kinds of sculpture on monuments of stone. We have the same recumbent figures, we have also beautiful crosses, as we have on the stone coffin-lids : a very graceful and interesting specimen of which occurs at Higham Ferrers, over the remains of the father and mother of Archbishop Chichele. 1 The niches and figures on the sides of high tombs are transferred to the margins of brasses, and with a splendid array of canopies emulate the beauty of the most elabo- rate masonry and sculpture. Of these several glorious specimens perished in the flames which destroyed S. Paul's Cathedral, among which was one of Thomas Eyre, Dean of S. Paul's, who died a.d. 1 500. The twelve apostles occupied as many niches at the edge of the brass, and at the top was a medallion of the Annunciation ; 2 while the figure of the dean himself in full pontifical habits, oc- cupied the usual place in the centre of the stone. Such a design as this, with the usual accompaniment of enamel, must have been very splendid. Allusions to particular circumstances in the lives of the per- sons commemorated are very rare, in the monuments, whether brasses or statuary, of the middle ages. There is, however, one of a recumbent figure at Coverham Abbey, in Yorkshire, sur- rounded by hounds and stag in full pursuit and flight, which doubtless records a passion, if not a particular act of the de- 1 See Churches of Northampton- tory and Antiquities of S. Paul's Cathe- shire, No. I. dral. 2 Hollar's Plate in Dugdale's His- 272 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. ceased ; and at King's Lynn, in Norfolk, is a very curious brass of Robert Brannel and his two wives, Letitia and Margaret, and " under the feet of the figures, occupying the whole width of the brass, is represented a sumptuous festival, at which twelve per- sons are present, nine males and three females ; the figure at the head is crowned ; the rest wear the chapeau, at each end are seen attendants bearing dishes, with peacocks in their plumes, preceded by musicians with trumpets, shawms, viols, &c. The first dish, a peacock, is presented to the royal personage at the head of the table, by a kneeling figure. It scarcely admits of a doubt," adds Mr. Taylor, from whose Anti- quities of King's Lynn I am quoting, " that this represents a banquet given by Brannel, during his mayoralty, to Edward III., who about that time frequently visited Lynn, and that the kneeling figure is Brannel himself." 1 The subject of wood carving is nearly connected with that which is more correctly called sculpture, and must be slightly alluded to. Of very ancient wood- work we have not many re- mains. 2 A few Early English screens and parcloses may be found, and only a few ; and of lighter tabernacle- work, or mise- reres in that style, I do not know that we have any examples. 3 There can be no question however, that the forms and decora- tions so distinctive of the stone-work of this style were repeated in all those articles of ecclesiastical or general furniture which were constructed of wood ; and of this a very interesting example oc- curs in a table in the kitchen of the Priory, at Winchester, figured in the Winchester transactions of the Archaeological 1 See also the brass of John Selwyn, ( 1 587) , in the church of Walton-upon- Thames, figured in Vol. I. of the An- tiquarian Repertory. It is reported of this man, that being keeper of her Majesty's park of Oatlands, he in the heat of the chase leaped from his horse upon the back of the stag, while both were at full speed, and drawing his sword guided the affrighted animal with it towards the Queen, and when near her, plunged his sword into its throat, so that it fell dead at her feet. In memory of this the said John Selwyn appears on his tomb on the back of the stag into which he is thrusting his sword. 2 A Norman, or rather a Transition screen is given in the Glossary, and also two Early English screens, and one Early English chest. 3 There is, however, at Aysgarth in Yorkshire, a church very rich in wood- work, a fragment of a seat, with the nail-head occurring upon it, and un- doubtedly Early English. SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 273 Institute, the legs of which are adorned with the peculiar crisped foliage of the style. The wood- work of the next century is more frequent, but still it is by no means commonly found. We have however several screens, and also some tabernacle work, as that of the restoration of Ely Cathedral, after the fall of the tower in 1322. But the next style is that in which wood- work most abounds ; not only because the perishable nature of the material has for- bidden the preservation of older specimens ; but because the art of carving in wood was carried to a greater extent, and much more frequently applied to the decoration of churches in the fifteenth century, than at any other time. To this century is to be referred the greater part of the beautiful tabernacle work in our cathedrals, and conventual churches ; the glorious rood- screens of Somersetshire and Devonshire, and the lofts wherever they remain, for I do not know that a single rood-loft, or any portion of one of an earlier style has been preserved. The bench ends even in small village churches, are often adorned with excellent carving of this age. And the open roofs, of which Suffolk affords the most numerous and beautiful examples are generally to be referred to the fifteenth century. Throughout all the styles, the decorations and mouldings of wood-work are identical with those of the stone-work of the same date, the tracery of the windows especially being often copied, without a single variation. It is true that no attempt was made to confuse the constructive provinces of wood and stone; 1 but even in roofs, where the long beam supplants the stone vault, supporting them on a totally different principle, the span- drils are filled with the very same open work that occurs in the mullions and tracery of the windows ; and the sides of chests, and the ends of seats have the same character of carving with the stone font, or the panelled surface of a wall ; even the but- tresses and pinnacles which are here constructively useless, being 1 There are however a few instances the choir is of wood, but vaulted, after in which wood is made to take the the manner of stone : and in the nave place of stone in construction, as for of the very beautiful church of War- instance, in the roofs of nave, choir, mington, in Northamptonshire, which and transepts of York Minster ; at is roofed in a similar way. Selby, in Yorkshire, where the roof of T 274 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. repeated in all their forms. This is a rare instance of poverty in principle in mediaeval ornament : the higher art, theoretically at least, of giving a character to the designs for wood carving, was not introduced till an age too late for the full application of the principle. With the sixteenth century came the linen pat- tern, as it is called, which is, as it ought to be, solely employed for wood-work ; the coarse arabesque patterns of the Stuart era were used alike in wood and in stone; and a century after Grin- ling Gibbons 1 gave to wood the grace of living flowers, by a skilfulness and lightness of hand which would have been in- valuable in earlier times, had the peculiar decorative capabilities of wood been cultivated. The only instances in which, as a general rule, the older workmen were touched with a feeling which might have led them to anticipate an equal beauty, and to have brought it at the same time into harmony with the types of Gothic art, occur in the poppy-heads of stalls, which are sometimes of exquisite force and lightness combined, and quite escape from the character of stone carvings. This praise belongs also, in a considerable degree to a very late, but most splendid specimen of stall-work in Wensley church, 2 Yorkshire, and the juxtaposition of some very elaborate Perpendicular work, but of the ordinary character, which occurs in the north aisle, renders the contrast very striking. The stalls in question occupy the north and south sides of the chan- cel, and are returned along the base of the roodscreen. They have richly decorated ends and poppy-heads, and panelled fronts. Before the poppy-heads are several animals, chiefly he- raldic, and it is in the designing and execution of these that the character now alluded to chiefly appears. The figures are 1, (commencing at the south-east, and going round the chancel,) a wyvern, 2. a bear, 3. a lion, 4. a griffin, 5. a hare, 6. an uni- corn chained. The hare especially is so good, so spirited and 1 The throne at Canterbury is his work. 2 Few churches are so well worthy of a visit from the ecclesiologist as this, though the exterior is far from promising; besides the wood- work above mentioned, the chancel contains the justly celebrated brass of a priest. The effect of the wood-work in the north aisle is destroyed by some mise- rable moresque additions. The inner door of the north porch is very good, and the situation of the church, in one of the most beautiful dales in Yorkshire, adds a charm to all these interesting objects. SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 275 true to life, that I doubt whether it could possibly be surpassed. Heraldic achievements enrich the ends of the benches, and the following inscription is distributed on thirty shields upon the panels, the letters being beautifully formed of a riband pattern, and very sharply carved. Henricus Richardson hujus [Ecclesise ? the shield is gone] Rector hoc fecit, [Anno] Dmi. m°ccccc g xl°vii Soli Deo honor et gloria. In the chapel of S. Nicolas, in King's Lynn, Norfolk, there are some stalls of nearly equal beauty, 1 and of very similar cha- racter, though a little earlier in date. Here also the heraldic animals have wonderful force, especially an antelope on one of the elbows of a stall, and a tiger, ducally gorged and chained on one of the misereres. But I mention these stalls for a very interesting group, which the carver has introduced into another of the misereres. He has represented himself at work upon some part, perhaps, of these very stalls ; and in the background two of his fellow-labourers busied in the same task. His dog- is represented sitting at his feet. His initials (or at least some initials,) are given on either side the group : the letters are pierced with a saw and a gouge. It is so seldom that we get any traces of the mediaeval artist at his work, that such an ex- ample as this is very interesting. 2 1 In his description of these stalls Mr. Taylor says, " In one small span- dril which a child's hand would cover, I observed a perfect figure of a man and four birds in various attitudes : and while admiring this, my attention was directed to others, less than half that size, so delicately finished, that even the feathers of the birds are de- picted." He very justly adds, " When we look at these minute works, and then think of the vast interior of the chapel, covered throughout with such elaborate productions, we cannot but regret the cold apathy of a succeeding age, that would not even preserve the work, thus carefully bestowed on the house of prayer by their zealous an- cestors." 2 This fine specimen of the stall - work of the fifteenth or sixteenth cen- tury (or rather what remains of it, for a great part of it has been barbarously destroyed) is greatly disfigured by suc- cessive coats of paint : not of the rich patterns and colours of the days of its early beauty, but of the dark cold hue, so charming to churchwardens. (Tay- lor's History of Lynn.) It may, per- haps, be necessary to mention that the ordinary wood-work of the middle ages was painted in brilliant colours — blue, vermillion and green, with the more prominent parts gilt ; but I should much doubt, whether the more beautiful late poppy-heads received this addi- tion, and the stalls just mentioned at Wensley were never, I am persuaded, injured by the addition of colour. 276 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. We shall scarcely find a better opportunity of noticing those grotesques, which are common to sculpture, painting, and carving, but are perhaps most usual in the carved misereres in conven- tual churches. Their introduction, even when simply ludi- crous, still more when satirical or obscene, into the furniture of the Lord's house, must be confessed to be extremely unhappy : nor do I think that any account that is given of them at all jus- tifies or even excuses their use. Sometimes, indeed, what is intended to be neither the one nor the other, is grotesque and ridiculous simply from want of skill in the designer and the artist : but far more frequently there is an obvious intention to provoke a smile, by ludicrous figures presented to the eyes. Obscene carvings and paintings are sometimes said to be in- tended to hold up vice to contempt and abhorrence, but I can- not discover in them such a tone of severity and scorn as would fit them for this purpose : they are simply coarse in the same sense in which many of the contemporary tales and poems must be called coarse, and certainly do not tend to correct the prurient fancies which they may call into being. The satire which some of them embody is chiefly to be referred to the jealousies of the secular and regular clergy one against the other, and of both against the mendicant Friars. These grotesques occur in all ages, and in all works of art. They abound in the borders of the Bayeaux tapestry. There are several in the paintings of the ceiling of the nave of Peterborough, which are supposed to be Norman in their design and original execution. They oc- curred in the decorations of S. Stephen's Chapel, Westminster. 1 In the Decorated stained glass in Stanford church, North- amptonshire, there are some specimens. There are several in the sculptures with which York Minster abounds ; 2 and to conclude with a very late example, they are found in the misereres of Henry the Seventh's Chapel in Westminster Abbey. A few examples may be cited of these last, which may represent the whole class. A cock in armour riding on a fox, and a fox in armour riding on a cock. A fiend seizing a miser, whose 1 There are several given in Smith's Westminster, p. 234. 2 See Halfpenny's York ; and Browne's York. In the latter work an unsuccessful attempt is made to give historic interpretations to these grotesques. SCULPTURE AND CARVING. 277 riches are falling from his money bag : at the sides fighting cocks, and a monkey beating a drum. A group of boys, one naked and his head between another's knees, while a third is flogging him with a rod. A chained bear, playing on the bag- pipes; an evil spirit, bearing away a Friar on his shoulders. 1 This last in a conventual church is sufficiently significant : but the secular clergy could forge similar weapons against the Friars, and find grave Divines to point them personally enough. Take the following instance : — Latimer, having been foolishly pressed with the literal sense of some figurative expressions in the Holy Scriptures, by one Buckingham, Prior of the Black Friars, in Cambridge, looking towards the place where the Friar was seated on the next Sunday, said in his sermon, — " When we see a fox painted in a friar's hood, nobody imagines that a fox is meant, but that craft and hypocrisy are described, which are so often found disguised in that garb." We may add, that the fox thus interpreted by Latimer was a very common device for a friar ; he is sometimes represented preaching to geese, thus including the stupidity of those who listen to him, in the same device with the craft of the obnoxious friar. 1 See Neale's Westminster Abbey. 278 CHAPTER XV. Painting, Mosaic, and Glass Painting, as Decorations of Ecclesiastical Architecture. Colour universally employed. — First recorded Introduction of Pictures. — Augustine, Benedict Biscop, Wilfrid. — S. Dunstan. — Skill of the Saxons in the decorative Arts. — Instances of Early Norman Painting. — Oil Painting in the tenth century, in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries — S. Stephen's, Westminster. — Ely Cathedral. — MS. account of Abbot Islip's funeral. — Lord Lindsay's estimate of the Mural Paintings of our Churches. — Subjects generally treated. — Two examples from Old S. Paul's. — Bishop Sherburn's Painting at Chiches- ter. — The present usage of the Church of England, — Mosaic derived from greece, through the roman empire to the Church. — Richard de Ware, Abbot of Westminster.— Prior Crowden's Chapel at Ely. — Difference of Treatment in Ro- man and English Mosaic. — Painted Glass. — Its Influence on Architectural Forms. — Early examples ; Canterbury, Win- chester, York, Ludlow, S. Neot's, Peterborough, Dorchester, Tickhill, West Wickham. — Memorial Windows. I have no intention in this chapter to enter upon the whole subject of polychromatic decorations, or upon anything that would now be referred to the house-painter or mere decorative artist. On this subject it is enough to state that paint and gold were very largely used in the decoration of churches from the earliest times ; that all parts of churches, and all materials and all ornaments were coloured ; that from the roof to the pavement every fine ecclesiastical edifice was gorgeous with gold and azure and vermillion ; that the most severe sculpture and the sharpest and most delicate oak carving was equally overlaid with paint ; and that what was meant to be natural aod what was meant to be unnatural accepted the same disguise. Indeed the colouring of surfaces, in themselves more beautiful uncoloured, was in some sort demanded by the gorgeousness of everything around. The roof was of blue and gold ; the walls of a painted diaper, or PAINTING, MOSAIC, AND GLASS PAINTING. 279 of figures in rich array ; the mouldings of piers and arches were relieved with deep but rich shadows, 1 and lights of crimson or of gold. The tabernacle work, the seats, the rood, the loft, and the roodscreen, the several parcloses, every niche and every bracket was of gay and strongly contrasted tints ; the floor was but a little less brilliant, with its encaustic pavement ; perhaps sometimes not less brilliant, with its mosaic or burnished and enamelled brass ; through windows of ruby and topaz and sap- phire and emerald, the sun poured such many-coloured beams as made the bright brighter still, and the gorgeous more exceed- ingly gorgeous. And on such a floor, along such an array of colour, and in such a light, moved the priests in robes of silk and fine brocade, and bawdkin and double-piled velvet, and gold and silver and precious stones, more dazzling than all, except the light of heaven that glanced from them. Amid all this the recumbent effigy, or the image of the saint, however really beautiful, might be cold and tame without colour, and an accessory, not in itself desirable, was forced upon it by circumstances. Nor may it be forgotten that the dress of sepulchral figures was generally he- raldic, and so would lose a meaning if it were not emblazoned. These things, and especially and above all the taste which we have now learned to repudiate, and which really held that colour was an additional beauty even to the highest efforts of the sculp- tor, must plead in excuse of the excessive use of colour in the ecclesiastical decorations of the middle ages. Now taste and circumstances are alike changed. We do not now think colour an additional beauty to really good imagery and carving. Who would paint the flowers of Grinling Gibbons, or the statues of Flaxman ? and as for attendant circumstances, some are removed without our times being consulted ; and others, even on aesthetic grounds, we would not recall. Setting aside, therefore, mere decorative or house painting as of a lower class than we shall discuss, and the painting of statuary and carving as no longer admissible, let us at once turn 1 Sometimes even the mouldings of are painted with butterflies and other arches were yet farther enriched than insects on a dark ground. In other by a mere shadow ; at Higham Ferrers, examples fleurs-de-lys and lions occur ; for instance, there is a sepulchral re- but the general effect is everywhere the cess, the hollow mouldings of which same. 280 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. to the ecclesiastical use of painting, in the truly artistic sense of the terms. We are told by the Venerable Bede, how Augustine at his first coming brought with him pictures which he used in religi- ous processions, 1 and which we may fairly infer were made at other times decorations of his church. The same authority tells us how Benedict Biseop, towards the close of the seventh cen- tury adorned his church at Wereinouth with pictures, of which the subjects also are enumerated. — The Blessed Virgin, and the twelve Apostles, the history of the Gospels, the visions related in the Apocalypse ; but these were not painted on the walls, nor executed here, but brought from Rome, and arranged about the church, on partitions and wainscotings of wood. The pictures with which Wilfrid enriched his church of S. Andrew at Hex- ham, were probably painted in distemper on the walls ; and if so, they were a great advance, not in the art of painting (rather perhaps the reverse,) but in the association of painting with architecture, as a means of decoration. We may safely assume the life of Dunstan as a point from which a greater perfection in all the decorative arts may be cal- culated. He was himself very skilful in all fictile arts, from bell-founding to goldsmith's work ; he was a great illuminator of manuscripts ; and we have seen him employed in devising and drawing patterns for embroidery. Henceforward there is per- haps as frequent notice of the use of all these sources of deco- ration as we could expect in very unsettled times, but we shall be contented with a few examples. Ernulf, prior of Canterbury at the end of the eleventh cen- tury, "having taken down the eastern part of the church which Lanfranc had built, erected it so much more magnificently, that nothing like it could be seen in England, either for brilliancy of its glass windows, the beauty of its marble pavement, or the many coloured pictures which led the wondering eyes to the very summit of the ceiling, and the chancel, which Ernulf left un- finished, was superbly completed by his successor Conrad, who 1 From the use of these in the open air, I should infer that they were painted with oil. Of the use of oil in the tenth and succeeding centuries, we have more direct evidence, as will pre- sently appear. PAINTING, MOSAIC, AND GLASS PAINTING. 281 decorated it with excellent paintings and furnished it with pre- cious ornaments. " l From the subsequent account of the fire in this church, as re- lated by Gervase, we find that the ceiling also was painted, and that gilding was applied as an enrichment of the furniture of the church. 2 With the exception of the illuminations in manuscripts and perhaps some specimens of early Norman glass, all relics of the pictorial decorations of these times have vanished : but if they kept pace at all with the best illuminations, they were not unworthy decorations of the most splendid churches. Indeed we have abundant proof that the English were not thought behind their neighbours in the ornamental arts, their jewellery being of great price, and their embroidery celebrated at a distance and highly valued even in more polished countries. 3 We have scarcely arrived at times, some relics of the mural paintings of which remain, when we find two distinct kinds of painting employed : fresco, (with which we class distemper,) and oil painting. Of the use of the first from the beginning there is and can be no question : but the very early use of oil as a vehicle of colour in ecclesiastical decorations deserves some little attention. The invention of oil painting is popularly given to John van Eyck, in 1410; but Theophilus in his treatise, de diversis artibus, which is attributed to the tenth century, gives receipts 1 William of Malmsbury, and Anglia Sacra, quoted from Professor Willis's Canterbury Cathedral. 2 " A gilded corona hangs in the midst of the Church." Gervase. — Willis, p. 37. 3 " The English were celebrated for their rich gold embroiderings. Being of needlework, wrought with threads of gold, opere Phrygionico, and thence sometimes called Aurifrisia, and Aurifrygia ; of which Matthew Paris tells us this very memorable story or passage, ' that once the Pope viewing, amongst some church orna- ments of the English, some curious Aurifrisian copes, he asked where they were made, and being told in England, Truly, saith he, England is our gar- den of pleasure and delight : truly it hath inexhaustible treasures, and where much is, much may be taken. And being mightily taken with them, he sent his bulls to all the Abbots of the Cistercian order in England, com- manding them to gather up all the best Aurifrisian copes they could meet with, and send them to him, for the better adorning of his quire; which was done accordingly, and transmitted by the mer- chants of London.' " — Staveley, p. 1 93 . 282 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. for the application of pigment with oil, and there are records positively proving the existence of the art in our own country, in the thirteenth century. In the rolls of expenses in the de- coration of S. Stephen's chapel, 20, 21, and 22 Edward I. (1292, 1293, and 1294,) more than a century before Van Eyck, there are items which show that oil was used in the process ; while the number and wages of the painters, with the time during which they were employed, proved that their work was something more than house painting. Although therefore we have no direct evidence of the subjects of the paintings, we should infer that they were artistic decorations. 1 The following extract not only establishes the use of oil, but also gives the names of some artists of that remote period. 2 Half a hundred of gold Three hundred of silver Two pounds of tin One pottle of oil A candle .... Master Walter's wages for a week John of Soningdon, for six days John of Carlisle, for the same time Roger of Winchester, for the same time Thomas of Worcester, for three days Roger de Beauchamp, for one day Roger of Ireland, for one day Thomas, son of Master Walter, for six days Henry of Sodington, for six days . 1 This inference is drawn in Smith's Antiquities of Westminster, from which work the extracts of the rolls also are copied. ' ' From the colours mentioned in these rolls, such as white lead, red lead, vermillion, azure, gold and sil- ver, it is evident that this could not have been only for house painting. On the contrary, the length of time em- ployed, which was at least from the feast of S. Martin, (11 Nov.) in the 20th, to the week next after the feast of S. Bartholomew, (24 Aug.) in the 22nd year of the king's reign ; together with the number of the painters, ou an average from eleven to fourteen, makes it more probable that the paintings were not even heraldical bearings, but human figures, either portraits, or ideal representations, and historical subjects ; such as were afterwards painted on the walls when the chapel was rebuilt by Edward III." — Smith's Westminster, p. 76. 2 The whole of the records given in Smith's Westminster are very inter- esting, but too long to be given here. PAINTING, MOSAIC, AND GLASS PAINTING. 283 In 1330, Edward III. rebuilt the chapel thus decorated by his grandfather, and in 1350 and other subsequent years, writs were issued for procuring painters. " Of these, the earliest that has been actually found, is dated the 18th of March, 24 Edward III., 1350, and directed to all sheriffs, mayors, bailiffs, ministers, and all other his faithful people, as well within liber- ties as without, to whom the then present writing should come. It recites, that the king had appointed Hugh de S. Alban's, master of the painters assigned for the works to be done in the chapel in the palace of Westminster, to take and choose out, in such places as he should see fit, as well within liberties as with- out, in the counties of Kent, Middlesex, Essex, Surrey, and Sussex, as many painters and other workmen as should be wanted for executing those works ; which painters and other workmen were to be sent to the palace at Westminster, there to remain in the king's service, at his expense, so long as should be necessary ; and it therefore 'required the before-mentioned persons to be ready to assist, counsel, and aid the said Hugh in the matters aforesaid, as often as they should have notice from him for that purpose. By another similar writ, of the same date, it appears that John Athelard was appointed to act in the same manner in the counties of Lincoln, Northampton, Oxford, Warwick, and Leicester ; and from a third writ, of the same kind and date, it is found that the counties of Cambridge, Huntingdon, Norfolk, and Suffolk, were, in like manner, and for the same purpose, subjected to the authority of Benedict Nightengale. On the 4th day of June, 37 Edward III. a.d. 1363, another writ of the same nature occurs, in which it is stated, that the king had appointed William de Walsyngham to collect as many painters in the city of London as would be sufficient for the works in S. Stephen's chapel, within the palace of Westminster, and to send them to the aforesaid palace, to be employed in those works, and to remain there at the king's ex- pense, so long as should be necessary : and had authorized him to arrest, and commit to prison, all such persons as he should find opposing or thwarting him in this undertaking. It there- fore commanded the persons to whom it was directed to be ready to aid, counsel, and assist the said William, in all the matters 284 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. aforesaid, as often as they should receive from him notice for that purpose." 1 The first account which we have of the workmen, thus sum- marily brought together, is in the rolls of expenses. We find for example : — Images. Workmen. £. s. d. 13 Sept. [6 Edw. III.] Master Richard of Reading, for making two images by task-work, in gross ; viz., for an image of S. Edward, and another image of S. John in the likeness of a pilgrim, which images are to be put in the front gable of the chapel . . . . .368 26 Sept. [25 Edward III.] William de Padryngton, for two images made for the chapel, by agreement made with him by the treasurer, to receive, by task-work, for each four marks . . . . . .568 William de Padryngton, mason, for making twenty angels to stand in the tabernacles, by task-work, at 6s. 8d. for each image . . . . . . 6 13 4 To the same for making a certain image, called John le Wayte, of stone found by himself, by task-work . .16 8 To the same William for making three kings to stand in the tabernacles of the chapel, of the king's stone, by task-work, at £2 13s. 4d. for each image . . .800 To the same William, for making two images of two serjeants- at-arms, of the king's stone, by task- work, at £4 each image . . . . . .800 12th March. [26 Edward III.] John Elham, Gilbert Pokerigh, William Walsingham, three painters, painting the taber- nacles and images in the chapel, six days, at lOd. a day each . . . . . . 15 [31 Edward III.] William Patrington, for making eleven images for the stalls, by task-work, at 8s. each image . .480 Materials. 19 April. [6 Edw. III.] Thomas Bernak, for one long and large stone, bought to make image of . . .060 16 August. Thomas Bernak of Ryegate, stonemason, for two large stones, bought to make two images, price each 5s. 6d. 1 1 30 August. Walter, the smith, for two large staples and two large hooks of his own iron, weight fourscore pounds, to bear and support two large images in the front of the chapel . 10 1 Smith's Westminster, p. 175. PAINTING, MOSAIC, AND GLASS PAINTING. 285 £. 8. d. 19 March. [26 Edw. III.] William Padryngton, for one large stone, bought at Dunstaple, for making an image of S. Stephen . . . . . 10 To the same, for the carriage of the same, with two other stones, bought for the images of two serjeants-at-arms, from Dun- staple to Westminster . . . .0100 To William de Padryngton, for one stone, bought for an image of S. Stephen . . . . . 10 To the same for two stones, bought for two images of two serjeants-at-arms . . . .10 To the same William for the carriage of the two stones for the aforesaid serjeants-at-arms, from Egremond to West- minster . . . . .10 [31 Edward III.] Master Andrew for one iron stand, bought for the image of S. Stephen, in gross . . .16 8 12 April. John Lightgrave, for seven hundred leaves of gold, bought for the painting of the tabernacles in the chapel .18 30 April. John Lyghgrave, for fifteen hundred leaves of gold, bought for the painting of the tabernacles and angels standing at the top of the tabernacles . .300 William Almand, for eight hundred leaves of gold, bought for the same . . . . . 1 12 7 May. John Lightgrave, for two thousand five hundred leaves of gold, bought for the painting of the tabernacles and images . . . . . .500 John le Tynbeter, for half a pound ofteynt, bought for painting the angels on the tabernacles . . .10 Painters employed on the chapel in general. 20 June, (25 Edw. III.) John Elham and Gilbert Pokerig, two painters, working there as well on the tablements as on the priming of the east end of the king's chapel, six days, at 1 Od. a day each 10 Edward Paynel and Roger Norwich, painters, working there on the said works, five days, at 6d. a day each 5 Edward Burton, painter, working with them, six days. at 5d. a day ..... 2 6 John Leverynton working with them, five days, at 5d. a day 2 1 Richard Lincoln, painter, working there, and grinding colours for the painting of the chapel, five days, at 4£d. a day 1 10* 27 June. John Elham and Gilbert de Pokerig, painters, working there on the aforesaid works, six days, at lOd. a day ..... 10 Edward Paynel, Benjamin Nightengale, and Roger Norwich, three painters, working there on the painting of the said tablement, six days, at 6d. a day . . .090 286 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. £. 8. d. John Levryngton and Edward Burton, two painters, working on the aforesaid works, five days, at 5d. a day . .042 Richard Lincoln, painter, grinding and tempering colours for the said painters, five days, at 4|d. a day . . 1 10| We are next introduced to two painters who may be styled artists, and who designed the works which were executed by the inferior workmen. £. s. d. 4 July. Master Hugh de S. Alban's 1 and John de Coton, paint- ers, working there on the drawing of several images in the same chapel, four days and a half at Is. a day each. 9 11th July. Master Hugh de S. Alban's, painter, working there on the ordination of the painting several images, two days, at Is. a day . . . . .020 John Cotton, painter, working there on the said drawing, six days, at Is. a day . . . .060 18 July. Hugh de S. Alban's, and John de Cotton, painters, working there four days, on the painting of the said chapel, at Is. a day each . . . .080 25 July. Hugh de S. Alban's, painter, working there on the or- dination of several images, four days, at Is. a day .040 John de Cotton, working there for five days on the painting of the said chapel, at Is. a day . . .050 15 Aug. Master Hugh de S. Alban's, painter, working there, two days, at Is. a day . , . . .020 John Cotton, painter, working there upon the painting of the said chapel five days, at Is. a day . . .050 Painters employed on particular parts. 30 Jan. (26 Edw. III.) John Elham and Gilbert Pokerigh, painting several images in the chapel, five days, at lOd. a day each . . . . .084 27 Feb. Hugh de S. Alban's, painter, working there, two days, on the drawing of the images in the same chapel, at the above daily wages . . . .020 19 March. John Elham, Gilbert Pokerigh, and Wm. de Wal- singham, three painters, painting images on the walls of the said chapel, six days, at lOd. a day each . .0150 Richard Croydon and John Palmer, doing the same there, six days, at 8d. a day each . . . .080 John Werkham, and five others, painting the walls of the said chapel, six days, at 6d. a day each . . .0180 John Leveryngton, and three others, laying on the gold on the walls of the said chapel, six days, at 5d. a day each . 10 1 The same person named in the writ before cited. PAINTING, MOSAIC, AND GLASS PAINTING. 287 £. *. d. 26 March. John Elham, Gilbert Pokerigh, and William de Walsyngham, three painters, painting images for the same chapel, six days, at lOd. a day each . . . 15 Thomas Ruddok doing the same there, six days, at 9d. a day .046 John Palmere, painting the walls of the said chapel, six days, at 8d. a day . . . .040 John Leveryngton, and two others, laying on the gold on the walls of the aforesaid chapel, six days, at 5d. a day each .076 Thus we have regular gradations of payment to the several painters, from Master Hugh de S. Alban's, and John de Coton, who work on the drawings, and on the ordination of images for Is. a day, to the second-rate artists who paint the said images when drawn and arranged, at 9d. or lOd. a day each ; the mere house painter who paints tablements and the like at 6d. ; the gilder who brings little but his labour to the task at 5d. ; and the grinder of colours at 4Jd. a day. The account of materials is equally minute. £. s. d. Master Hugh de S. Alban's, for half a pound of teynt, for the painting of the said chapel . . .020 To the same, for one pound and a half of oker, for the same painting . . . . .003 To the same, for two small earthen jars, to put the different colours in . . . . .001 One pound and a half of Cynephe for the painting of the upper chapel . . . . . 17 3 1 5 Aug. Lonyn de Bruges, for six pounds and a half of white varnish, for the painting of the said chapel, price per pound 9d. . . . . . 4 10| One pair of shears to cut the leaves of tyn . .002 19 Sept. Nineteen flagons of painters' oil, for painting of the chapel, at 3s. 4d. per flagon . . .334 Wm. de Hamelamsted, for one hundred and a half and two pounds of tin, for the king's works, at £1 2s. per hundred 1 13 5 7 Nov. John Madefray, for one flagon of cole, for the painting of the chapel . . . . .001 2 Jan. John Lambard, for two quatern of royal paper, for the painters' patrons 1 . . . .018 One pound of cotton to lay on the gold . . . 10 One pair of scales to weigh the different painters' colours .010 20 Feb. John Tynbeter, for six dozen leaves of tin, for the pryntes for the painting of the chapel . .060 1 Patterns. 288 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. £. S. d. 5 March. Master Andrew the smith, for one fork of iron, sharpened for the painters . . .002 19 March. John Matfray, for four pounds of oker, for the prim- ing of the walls of the same chapel . . .008 To the same for two pounds of brun for the same . .006 16 April. John Matfray, for two pounds of Vert de Grece, for the painting of the same chapel . . .024 22 April. John Lighgrave and William Allemant, for two thousand one hundred leaves of gold, for the painting of the same chapel . . . . . .480 To the same, for four hundred leaves of silver, for the painting of the same chapel, at 8d. per hundred . .028 To the same for thread to bind the pencils and brushes of the painters . . . . .001 4 June. Gilbert Pokerich, for one hundred and fifty-three pea- cock's and swan's feathers, for the pencils of the painters 3| Simon de Lenne, for one pound and a half of hogs' bristles, for the brushes of the painters . . .010 1 1 June. Gilbert Pokergh, for thread and squirrels' tails, for the painters' pencils . . . .002 Nicholas Chaunser, for fifteen ells of canvas, to cover the images of the kings to be painted . . .068 Boatage and porterage of the said canvas and cable from Lon- don to Westminster . . . .003 This roll of materials, besides the principal fact that oil was used as a vehicle, proves also that all the preparations for the work, even the making of brushes, was a part of the limner's business ; nor does the painter's catalogue of the present day afford better materials, or more certain indications of variety in the work, than the hogs' bristles, the squirrels' tails, and the feathers of certain fowls used by the painters of S. Stephen's chapel. Their list of colouring matters however is scarcely so well fur- nished, but in point of brilliance of effect much would be gained by the use of three metals, gold, silver, and tin, in their metallic state, employed contrary to all modern principles in artistic, as well as in mere decorative painting. 1 The whole of the chapel in which these paintings were made 1 There are, however, several other pigments mentioned by Theophilus, in the work above referred to. PAINTING, MOSAIC, AND GLASS PAINTING. 289 lias been destroyed, and they have of course perished with the walls on which they were- painted : but careful drawings were made by Mr. Smith, and by the Society of Antiquaries, in which their subjects, and the treatment of them are perpetuated. Be- sides the mere painting and gilding with which all the carving and imagery was overlaid, and which of course fell under the hand of the painters at least cost, there were several grotesques with enough of spirit and drawing to have been " ordained " by Hugh de S. Alban's, or John de Coton, and executed by the second-rate artists : and the portraits, of which there were several inscribed with their names, and the Scripture subjects were of course drawn, and it is more than probable in great part coloured, by the more considerable limners. There is a great tendency in those who are engaged in arch- aeological pursuits to assume the excellence of relics of mediaeval art, which have been destroyed ; but if any faith is due to the drawings published by the Society of Antiquaries at the time of the discovery of these paintings, 1 which was also the time of their destruction, it cannot be denied that the paintings in S. Stephen's were very fine specimens of design and of execution. The portraits are almost as full of grace and dignity as the con- temporary sculptures ; and one especially, which has been sup- posed to represent Edward III. himself, was excellent. There are besides paintings of part of the histories of Job and of Tobit, in which there is considerable force and expression, and a good deal of art in the grouping of figures. — To these were added pictures of the Adoration of the shepherds, of the Presentation of Christ in the Temple, and of the Adoration of the Magi. Of this last the lower part only remained, but if the rest was equal to the Holy Child, and the drapery which remained of the blessed Virgin, it was a charming and an exalted composition. These subjects were all of them surrounded by figures and cano- pies and other architectural decorations, and were painted on rich diaper grounds. It is not easy to decide at a glance what was the vehicle used 1 This discovery is associated with a remarkable era in our national his- tory. The paintings were discovered and destroyed during the arrangements made for adapting the Houses of Par- liament for the increased number of members at the union with Ireland in 1800. V 290 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. in paintings on a wall, without the intervention of copper, wood, or canvas, which have been exposed for four or five hundred years to the changes of the atmosphere; and perhaps some paintings generally called, fresco may be in oil, though most of them are almost certainly neither oil nor fresco properly so called, but distemper. But whatever the kind of painting, I fear that in descending from the rich and royal foundation of S. Stephen's to ordinary churches, where at the present day paint- ings are most frequently found, we are descending also to a much lower grade of art. And yet there can be no reasonable doubt that the skill of the best limners was consecrated to the service of the church. The only very high specimen of art which oc- curs to me at present is not purely architectural. It is however ecclesiastical in the strictest sense, and it is also rich in architec- tural drawing, and is in commemoration of one of the last persons whose names are honoured for their connection with architecture. The piece to which I allude is a very beautiful drawing on vellum, in the possession of the Society of Antiqua- ries, of which they have published copies, with the following description. It consists of five compartments. "The first contains the figure of John Islip, 1 Abbot of Westminster, standing under an arch, ornamented with wreaths of flowers of different kinds, interspersed with which, are scrolls having the names of various virtues, &c., inscribed on them : in each of his hands he holds a flower ; one of them is slipped off, and he is in the action of slipping off the other ; in allusion to his name, I — slip. Above the arch are three angels holding shields of arms ; that in the centre is charged with cross keys and an an- nulet, that on the dexter side has the arms of Edward the Confessor, and that on the left the arms of France and England quarterly. There are also three Angels at the feet of the abbot holding shields of arms ; in the cen- 1 Abbot Islip was a great favourite with King Henry the Seventh, and laid the first stone of the chapel which bears his name ; he superintended the building of it during that monarch's lifetime, and till its completion in the reign of King Henry the Eighth. He was himself also a great benefactor to the Abbey church, and was engaged in finishing the west end at the time of his death. He became abbot of West- minster in the year 1500, and died on the 12th of May, 1522, in the twenty- third year of King Henry VIII. On the 1 6th of the same month he was buried in the chapel dedicated to S. Erasmus, which he had founded, in Westminster Abbey. PAINTING, MOSAIC, AND GLASS PAINTING. 291 tral one under a mitre is the personal coat of the abbot, ermine, a fess be- tween three rats passant gules ; that on the dexter side, is charged with a fess engrailed between three crosses patee fitche, and on the sinister side are the arms of the abbey, azure on a chief indented or, a pastoral staff in the centre and a mitre in the sinister corner gules. A scroll over the head of the abbot is thus inscribed, ' Johannes Islype nuper abbas West- monasterii and under his feet is the following inscription : ' Inqvire pacem et persequere earn.' n for a tenth part of its population ; until some at least of the churches that remained were in a state which would not be tolerated in the stables of neighbouring mansions : and until, for very necessity, conventi- cles were substituted for churches : 2 nor how at last, when some- thing must be done, for very shame or for fear, many causes conspired to prevent the churches newly erected from taking their place as works of art, and objects of beauty, beside our beauti- ful and venerable sanctuaries. It is sufficiently well known as a general fact, though perhaps it is strangely little known in its particular incidents, how the greater churches belonging to the monastic bodies were sold or granted by the crown during the Reformation to needy and un- principled courtiers, or retained for unhallowed uses ; and how they were stripped of their roofs, and taken to pieces for their mere materials ; and how the remaining cathedrals, and the parish churches, with a few others which were saved by the inter- vention of better counsels, 3 or actually purchased by the inhabi- tants, 4 were stripped of their decorations. Thus a church was destroyed by Henry VIII. to build Nonsuch. The protector Somerset pulled down the parish church of S. Mary's, and the palaces of the Bishops of Worcester, Lichfield, and LlandafF, to form a site for Somerset House, and several chapels and religious houses supplied the materials. Tewkesbury was granted to Sir 1 The very word indicates our po- verty. Could there, since the full establishment of Christianity, till long after the Reformation, have been such a question asked as whether there was " church-room " in any district ? 2 In 1268, Branescombe, Bishop of Exeter consecrated forty churches in his diocese. One would be curious to know how many churches were conse- crated during the whole of the episco- pates, of all the post-Reformation Bishops, till the year 1800. The pre- sent Bishop of Exeter is exerting him- self, not in vain we hope, to procure " church- room" in Devonport, which, with a population of 26,000 persons, has not a single church ! 3 York was besieged by Fairfax, but the inhabitants surrendered on condi- tion that their minster and churches should be spared. The condition was respected. Perhaps the chapter-house was not accounted a part of the church. It is said to have been sold as useless, and to have been doomed to destruc- tion, but the death of the purchaser saved it. 4 S. Alban's was thus saved, being purchased for £400 by the inhabi- tants, and converted into a parish church. See Staveley on Churches. 394 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. Thomas Seymour : the church remains as a parish church, but it was sadly despoiled ; the vestments were sold for £194>, the plate weighed 1431 oz.: the lead 180 fodder, the bells 14,600 lbs. and all this besides jewels. 1 Although of course the valuable materials were converted either to immediate use, or into money, yet the mere wanton determination to destroy seems to have dictated the demolition or dismantling of several conventual fabrics. The author of " Monks and Monasteries " quotes a remarkable document of a royal commissioner, in which the true spirit of a spoliator is ex- pressed with great naivete. 2 These men seem to have had some- thing of a sportsman's delight in marking and bringing down the prey : had the prey been less feeble, and had the excitement of flight or of resistance been added to their sport their satisfac- tion would have been complete. But though wood and stone might seem too passive to revenge the injury, it turned out far otherwise : " the stone cried out of the wall, and the beam out of the timber answered it." 3 It was a thing notorious at the time, and which we would not willingly have forgotten, that the spoils of churches brought no blessing 1 Spelman's History and Fate of Sa- crilege, recent edition. 2 ' ' Plesy the your good lordship to be advertysed, I have taken down all the lead of Jervase, and made it in pecys of half foders, which lead amountyth to the number of eighteen score and five foders ; with thirty and four foders and a half that were there before ; and the same lead cannot be conveit nor caryed unto the next sombre, for the ways in that country are so foull and deep, that no caryage can pass in wyn- tre ; and as concernynge the raising and taking down the house, iff it be your lordshipp's pleasure, I am minded to lett it stand to the spring of the year, by reason of the days are now so short it would be dowble charges to do it now ; and as concernynge the sell- ing of the belles, I cannot sell them above fifteen shillings the hundreth ; wherein I would gladly know your lordshipp's pleasure, whether I should sell them after that price or send them up to London. And if they be sent up, surelye the caryage will be costly from that place to the water. And as for Bridlington, I have doun nothing there as yet, but spayreth it to March next, because the days now are so short, and from such time as I begyn I trust shortly to dispatch it after such fashion, that when all is finished, I trust your lordshipp shall think that I have been no evil housbound in all such things as your lordshipp appointed me to do ; and thus the Holy Ghost preserve your lordshipp in honour. « At York, the 14th day of Novem- ber, 1538, by your most bounden beadman, Richard Bellasis." 3 Habakkuk ii. 11. THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 395 with them, and that the materials somehow or other turned to no profit. They were lost in their transit, as a very great pro- portion of the bells were ; or they paid gambling debts ; or they eat into the house as doth a canker. 1 I purposely omit to mention the general fate of sacrilege, where the property of the Church, its wealth and its broad lands were taken, but some reference to the curse which seemed to cleave even to the materials of the religious houses and of the churches, could not be omitted without evident impropriety in a history of ecclesiastical architecture. The several royal injunc- tions, with the episcopal articles of visitation from the close of the reign of Henry VIII. to the end of that of Elizabeth, give sufficient note of the changes in smaller matters of decoration and arrangement which were continually occurring. These, however, do not come strictly speaking within the subject of this work, for they do not touch the fabric of the church. Nor are churchwarden % 3 accounts and the like contemporary notices of such events more directly to our purpose ; they are, however, al- ways amusing and often interesting, and as they are not found 1 Sir Henry Spelman relates the fol- lowing instance, of which he speaks as within his own knowledge, and as admitted by the person concerned. " Sir Roger Townsend, the baronet, intending to build a goodly house at Rainham, and to fetch stone for the same from Coxford Abbey, by advice of Sir Nathaniel Bacon, his grandfather, began to demolish the church there, which till then was standing : and beginning with the steeple, the first stone (as it is said,) in the fall brake a man's leg, which somewhat amazed them ; yet contemn, ing such advertisement, they proceeded in the work, and overthrowing the steeple, it fell upon a house by, and breaking it down, slew in it one Mr. Seller, that lay lame in it of a broken leg, gotten at foot-ball, others having saved themselves by fright and flight. " Sir Roger having digged the cellar- ing of his new house, and raised the walls with some of the abbey stone, breast-high, the wall reft from the corner stones, though it was clear above ground ; which being reported to me by my servant, Richard Ted- castle, I viewed them with mine own eyes, and found it so. Sir Roger, ut- terly dismayed with these occurrents, gave over his begun foundation ; and digging anew wholly out of the ground, about twenty yards more forward to- ward the north, hath there finished a stately house, using none of the abbey stone about it, but employed the same in building a parsonage-house for the minister of that town, and about the walls of the churchyard, &c. 4 1 Himself also showed me that as his foundation reft in sunder, so the new bridge, which he had made of the same stone at the foot of the hill, which ascendeth to his house, settled down with a belly as if it would fall." 396 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. in general history, a specimen may be admissible here. I give, therefore, the Churchwardens' Account, S. Helen's, Abingdon. s. d. MDLIX. Eliz. 2. For taking down the altere . . 20 MDLX. Received of Thomas Hethe for the holye loft . 2 Of William Dale for the holye loft . . .64 Payde for tymber and making the communyon table 6 For a carpet for the communyon table . .28 For mending and paving the place where the altere stoode 2 8 For two dossin of morris belles . . .10 MDLXI. Elizabeth 4. To the somner for bringing the order for the roode loft . . . .08 To the carpenter and others for taking down the roode loft and stopping the holes in the wall, where the joices stoode . . . . 15 8 To the peynter for wrighting the scripture, where the roode lofte stoode, and overthwarte the same isle . 3 4 MDLXIV. For reparations of the cross in the market place . 5 2 MDLX VI. 16 Eliz. Payde for setting up Robin Hoode's bower 1 18 MDLXXVII. 20 Eliz. For writing the commandments in the quire and peynting of the same . . .19 MDXCI. 34 Eliz. Payde for an houre glass for the pilpitt 2 . 4 The tendency during Elizabeth's reign, 3 so far as acts of au- thority were concerned, was on the whole to decency if not 1 " I came once myselfe," says Latimer, Sermon VL, before King Edward VI., " to a place, riding on a journey homeward from London, and I sent word overnight into the town that I would preach there in the morn- ing, because it was a holy day, and methought it was an holidaye's worke ; the church stode in my way ; and I toke my horse and my companye and went thither ; I thought I should have found a great companye in the churehe, and when I came there the churche dore was faste locked. I tarried there half an houre and more, and at last the keye was founde ; and one of the parishe commes to me, and sayes, ' Syr, thys ys a busye day with us, we cannot heare you : it is Robyn Hoode's daye, The parishe are gone abroad to gather for Robyn Hoode, I pray you let them not.' I was fayne there to geve place to Robin Hoode. I thought my rochet should have been regarded, thoughe I were not ; but it woulde not serve, it was fayne to give place to Robyn Hoode's men." 2 Archseologia, Vol. I. 3 During this reign, (June 4, 1561,) the spire of S. Paul's Cathedral, the loftiest in the world, was burnt down. An extract from a contemporary ac- count will be found in the Appendix to this Chapter. THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 397 splendour of ceremonial ; but the under-current of Puritanism soon reached the surface, and overflowed the feeble barrier that had been opposed to it, leading to acts of sacrilege and spolia- tion little less lamentable than those of Henry VIII. Indeed insolence in sacrilege could proceed no farther than it did during the Great Rebellion and under the Commonwealth. Under Henry VIII. and his minions and their successors, the destruction of churches was in proportion to their wealth. Under Cromwell the desolating axe fell on sacred furniture and decorations in proportion to their beauty and to the holiness of their use : cupidity directed the blow in the former instance, in the latter superstition, and between the two the havoc was most complete. We have a few scattered notices of the results of Puritan visi- tations in several districts, 1 but the state of the churches every- where proves that their deeds have been very imperfectly recorded. At Canterbury, " on the 22nd Aug. 1642, some zea- lous troopers hewed the altar rails all to pieces, and threw the altar over and over, down the three altar steps, and left it lying with the heels upwards." 2 The font also in the same Cathedral was broken to pieces : meet accompaniments of the insults, in- justice, and violence which the Archbishop of Canterbury was then receiving, and preludes of his sacrilegious murder. The more beautiful statuary, and the figures of saints in painted glass, seem to have been designedly used as marks in rifle practice; but we will desert such general statements, and turn to the confessions, 3 (or rather the boast) of one of the Parlia- mentary visitors for the demolishing of the superstitious pictures and ornaments of churches. The whole of this journal is most instructive, as showing the utilitarian simplicity with which the work of demolition 1 Mercurius Rusticus gives several Earl of Manchester, for demolishing disgusting details of the desecration of the superstitious pictures and orna- Westminster Abbey. ments of churches, &c, within the 2 Dean and Chapter news from Can- county of Suffolk, in the years 1643 terbury, by Richard Culmer, quoted — 1644. First published in quarto in from Archseologia, Vol. XI. 1786, and lately as an Appendix to 3 The Journal of William Dowsing, one of the reprints of English Divines of Stratford, Parliamentary Visitor, at Oxford. appointed under a warrant from the 398 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. was carried on, and the unblushing effrontery with which its perpetrators could speak of their individual share in it. Their ignorance, too, of the real nature of the evils which they fancied that they were opposing, is almost enough to raise a laugh at their absurdities, in spite of the sadness occasioned by their sacrilegious violation of whatever was beautiful or holy. The cross upon the steeple, or on the chancel, might have seemed beyond the reach of their malice ; too innocent to give offence, and too difficult of access to encourage their interfer- ence ; but there are many entries such as the following : " Cod- denham, Jan. 22nd. We gave order for taking down three crosses off the steeple, and one off the chancel." All pictures, even those in the stained glass, which were never, that I know of, used for superstitious purposes ; and those of the seven deadly sins, which no one on earth would profess to worship, as a part of his religion, were condemned at once. " Rushmere, Jan. 27th. We brake down the pictures of the seven deadly sins." " Bramford, Feb. 1st. A cross to be taken off the steeple ; we brake down eight hundred and forty-one superstiti- ous pictures." Their use, as architectural ornaments, did not defend corbels and mouldings, and the like, if unhappily they were thrown into the form of figures. " Shadbrook, April the 4th. Eight angels off the roof, and cherubims in wood, to be taken down." Nay, the carver's or the painter's hand seems to have brought with it pollution, when most innocently employed ; and even in the placing the name of our Blessed Lord, or portions of the Sacred Scriptures, before the eyes of the people. At Cochie, " there were many inscriptions of Jesus, in capital letters on the roof of the church : and cherubims with crosses on their breasts ; and a cross in the chancel ; all which, with divers pictures in the windows, which we could not reach, neither would they help us to raise the ladders," [unnatural, ungodly men !] H all which we left a warrant with the constable to do in fourteen days." " Beccles, April the 6th. Jehovahs, 1 between the church and chancel, and the sun over it ; and by the altar, My flesh is 1 This must mean the Hebrew letters which express this name of the Almighty. THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 399 MEAT INDEED, AND My BLOOD IS DRINK INDEED." " South- wold. To take down the cover of the font." Nor must the ear be spared, any more than the eye : " organs I brake," is not an uncommon entry : and it would be most un- just to omit the following beautiful and unaffected touch of charity: " Ufford, Aug. 31st. We brake down the organ cases, and gave them to the poor." The resistance of the inhabitants, which is noticed, seems to have saved some of the furniture of this church ; for there is also the following entry, with no mention of demolition : " There is a glorious cover over the font, like a pope's triple crown, with a pelican on the top, picking its breast, all gilt over with gold." The folly of quarrelling with a hood and surplice is just equalled by the ignorance which associates the academical with the clerical vestments : " Elmsett, Aug. 22nd. Crow, a deputy, had done before we came, we rent apieces there the hood and surplice." Of course whatever tended to distinguish the chancel from the church, or to signify the sanctity of the altar, was con- demned. Such items as the following are very frequent : " Broke in pieces the rails, and gave orders to pull down the steps." It might have been expected that private chapels would escape. Vain hope ! " The lady Bruce" laments the destruction of her pictures, and " The Lord Windsor," and " Mr. Captain Wald- grave," (i.e. their servants) refuse the 6s. 8d. which are the wages of Wm. Dowsing' s iniquity. And all this while those are the godly men, whether consta- bles, or churchwardens, or even clergymen, who join most heartily in the work of demolition — " Aldborough, Jan. 24. We gave order for taking down twenty cherubims, and thirty- eight pictures ; which their lecturer, Mr. Swayn, (a godly man,) undertook, and their Captain Mr. Johnson." Really when Puritan reformation was thus carried on, we cannot but express the least sympathy with the one instance of a parish whose church had nothing to reform : — " Feby. the 3rd. Wen- ham Magna. There was nothing to reform." Besides this destruction, under pretence of reformation, many churches suffered greatly from the effects of a civil war, 400 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. in which one of the contending parties treated them habitually as profane, while the other party sometimes brought harm upon them by converting them or neighbouring buildings, into places of defence and refuge. Churches were perpetually converted into barracks, by the Puritans, and horses 1 were quartered in them as well as the troopers to whom they belonged. Ecclesiastical edifices in the same town with a fortress, or themselves capable of defence, were, of course, most subject to the direct assaults of besiegers, and the unhappy necessities of a beleaguered garrison. Thus the Cathedral of Lichfield, stand- ing in a close which was adapted to hold out against the rebels, suffered more than any other church in the kingdom of the same importance. And Scarborough church was battered most un- mercifully from the castle. Of the latter instance I shall give the history. Scarborough was twice besieged during the great Rebellion, and the church suffered on each occasion. Sir John Meldrum, a Scotchman, was sent against it by the Parliament. The fol- lowing are among the notes of his proceedings : " On February 18th, (1644,) about ten o' clock, Scarborough was stormed in four places by the English and Scottish soldiers, who gained the town and the church with the loss of eleven men. In the church they took eighty soldiers and the governor of Helmsley Castle. They also took in the town and church thirty- two pieces of ordnance, with store of arms and other prize. And Sir John Meldrum, having made a lodgement with his troops in the church of S. Mary, conveyed several pieces of artillery into it in the night, and opened a battery from the east window ; but 1 "To me it was enjoyment enough to behold your happy change, and to see the same city, the metropolis of loyalty and of the kingdom, to behold the glory of English Churches re- formed, that is delivered from the Reformers ; and to find at least the service of the Church repaired, though not the building. To see S. Paul's delivered from beasts here, as well as S. Paul at Ephesus : and to view the church thronged only with troops of auditors, not of horse!" — South's Sermons. There had been already a fiscal con- version of churches into stables. Rid- ley being about to give Grindal a prebend in S. Paul's, was prevented by the council, it being their pleasure that the king should have it for the furni- ture of his stables ! See Blunt's Hist, of the Reformation, p. 244. S. Paul's was especially unhappy. In 1561 the south aisle was a horse fair ! — Strype. % THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 401 the garrison made such a vigorous and well-directed fire, that the choir of the church was demolished." On another occasion Sir John Meldrum was repulsed with great loss, and himself re- ceived a wound of which he died, June 3rd, 1645. In November, 1646, among other damages sustained by Scar- borough during the siege, the following is specified in a memorial presented to the Parliament : — " Their churche wholly ruinated, except the walls and some part of the roof, which was formerly in good repaire." In consequence of these repeated injuries the central tower fell in October, 1659, and considerably injured a great part of the nave of the church ; and the inhabitants were under the necessity of having recourse to a brief, from which the following passage is extracted. " Whereas we are credibly informed by the humble petition of the inhabitants of the town corporate of Scarborough, that during the late wars our said town of Scarborough was twice stormed, and the said inhabitants disabled from following their ancient trade, whereby they are much impoverished, and almost ruined in their estates ; and that nothing might be wanting to make their condition more deplorable, their two fair churches were, by the violence of the cannon, beaten down ; that in one day there were three score pieces of ordnance discharged against the steeple of the upper church there, called S. Mary's, and the choir thereof quite beaten down, and the steeple thereof so shaken, that notwithstanding the endeavours of the inhabitants to repair the same, the steeple and bells, upon the tenth day of October last, fell and brought down with it most part of the body of the said church ; but the other church, called S. Tho- mas's Church, was, by the violence of the ordnance, quite ruined and battered down ; so that the said church, called S. Mary's, must be rebuilt, or otherwise the said inhabitants will remain destitute of a place wherein to assemble themselves for the public worship of Almighty God. And that the charges of re- building the church, called S. Mary's, will cost =€2,500 at the least, which of themselves they are not able to disburse, their fortunes being almost ruined by the calamities of the late war, as aforesaid." 1 1 See HinderwelPs History of Scarborough, D D 40.2 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. It is one of the sad consequences of rebellion, that it forces, even upon the faithful, acts which would otherwise be wrong, and which are, under any necessity, most unhappy. Thus the Church during the troubles of King Charles the Martyr, not only suffered under the attacks of the Puritans, but was despoiled even by the loyalty of her faithful sons ; a great part of the Church plate being sacrificed to the royal cause. Hence partly, the very great rarity of Ante-Reformation communion-plate ; and hence the question whether its absence is not more honourable to a parish than its existence. Nor should we forget, that without the avowed intention of robbery, but under the pretence of restoration, or of fitting churches to another service, or from a niggard expenditure in repairs with a total want of the sense of propriety, or even de- cency, not to speak of reverence in such matters, churches were suffering destruction during the whole of the troublous times of which we have been speaking, and that they are still perpetually suffering from the like causes. Sir William Dugdale's lament on the fine collegiate church of Astley, in Warwickshire, the work of Sir Thomas Astley, in the fourteenth century, may stand as a fair exposure and rebuke of such conduct. One Adrian Stokes got possession of the Lordship in right of his wife, and this notable esquire " much defac't the church before specified as not onely by tradition of the inhabitants, but a presentment upon oath in i. Eliz. may appear ; which manifesteth, that he caused the tall and costly spire made of timber, to- gether with the battlements, all covered with lead, to be pull'd down, being a landmark so eminent in this part of the woodland, where the ways are not easy to hit, that it was called the Lanthorn of Arden. As also the two fair iles, and a goodly building, called S. Anne's Chappell, adjoyn- ing, the roofs of which were likewise leaded. By reason of which sacri- legious action, the steeple, standing in the midst, took wet, and decayed, so that, about the year 1600, it fell down to the ground, and with it a great part of the church, Ric. Chamberlain, Esq., being then Lord of this man- nour, by the Grant of Q. Mary to Edw. Chamberlain, his father, (of the family of Chamberlain of Shirburn in Oxfords.) who, with some contri- bution from the country, did, about the year 1 607, begin the building of the tower again ; but, instead thereof, took totally away all the west part of the church, with the north and south cross iles, making that which was the quire the body of the church, but pulled down the other beautifull THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 403 chappells on the north and south side of the quire, setting up that which stood on the north side at the east end for a chancel], wherein were the monuments of Edw. Grey Vise. L'isle and his 2 wives : And in that on the south side of Thomas Grey Marg. Dorset and his Lady, with their statues in alabaster excellently cut; and in the vault underneath the same their bodyes; that of the Marquess embalmed and wrapt in cerecloth many double in a coffin of lead ; which, through the vain curiousity of some being opened, his corps was found as intire, and free from any seeming corrup- tion, as if he had been but newly dead. At the pulling down and trans- lating of which chappell, it was resolved that the monuments should be set up againe in the church ; the said corps with the coffin of lead being accordingly removed thither: howbeit this good intention afterwards cooled, and the statues of the Marquess and his lady were cast into the belfrey, that of the woman having a coronet on her head ; and those of the other thrown into an old outhouse amongst lime and rubbish; all which I myself have seen." 1 The restoration of the Church and Monarchy did not in any adequate degree repair the injuries which had fallen on churches and church furniture, during the twenty disastrous years which had preceded. Nor was there anything during this period to indicate a change in architectural taste and execution ; the de- based Gothic of Queen Elizabeth's reign being still followed in the few restorations and additions which were attempted about this period. But there is one work which it would be unjust not to men- tion with the great praise which it deserves. I have already said that Lichfield Cathedral suffered very greatly in the Rebellion, and when Bishop Hacket came to his throne, 2 the roof was beaten in, the central spire was entirely destroyed, those at the west end were nearly in the same state, the sculpture in the west part was defaced, the painted glass was broken, and the monuments muti- lated and despoiled. The morning after his arrival at Lichfield, Bishop Hacket began the restoration of his desolated cathedral. He roused his servants by break of day, set his own coach horses with trams and labourers, to remove the rubbish, and laid the first hand to the work himself. Very large subscriptions were 1 Dugdale's Warwickshire. 2 Which was offered to the notori- ous Baxter, " factionis Presbyterianse Coryphaeus," as Godwin calls him. D Would he in better times, and with the grace of an office of Divine insti- tution, have built up that which he and his had laboured to destroy ? 2 404 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. gathered, chiefly by the personal assiduity of the Bishop, who obtained also from Charles II. a grant of one hundred fair tim- ber trees out of Needwood forest, towards the work. In eight years the work was completed at a cost of ,£20,000, 1 and on the 24th December, 1669, the church was solemnly reconsecrated. In the following year Bishop Hacket contracted for six bells ; the first of which only was hung during his life. He was then in his last illness, and went out of his bedchamber into the next room to hear it. He was pleased with the sound, blessed God Who had favoured him with life to hear it, and said that it would be his passing-bell. He never left his chamber again. 2 I transcribe the account of another meritorious restoration, from Staveley's History of Churches. I am not able to say how far the praise of architectural propriety is due to the work there recorded. " Sir Robert Shirley, late of Stanton Harold, in the county of Leicester, Baronet, deceased, pull'd down an old ruinous church at Stanton Harold, and in the place thereof, at his own charges, built a new one, compleat for the workmanship ; plentiful and honourable for the furniture, ornaments, and endowment ; but most admirable for the time wherein the same was undertaken and finished ; it being then when the roofs of our cathedrals were generally pulled down, and the foundation of all other churches un- dermined : the time and manner of which work is set forth by an inscrip- tion over the entrance thus : In the year 1653, when all things sacred throughout the nation were either demolished or profaned, Sir Robert Shirley, Baronet, founded this church, whose singular praise it is, to have done the best things in the worst times, AND HOPED THEM IN THE MOST CALAMITOUS. 'THE RIGHTEOUS SHALL BE HAD IN EVERLASTING REMEMBRANCE.'" 3 1 Godwin. 2 See Winkles' Cathedrals. 3 Staveley, pp. 143, 144. THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 405 In the year 1666, an event took place which had a most disastrous influence on ecclesiastical architecture, and intro- duced, or at least firmly established, the pseudo-classic style which prevailed until very recently. The fire of London de- stroyed a great part of the city, with several churches, among which was the Cathedral Church of S. Paul, the largest, and one of the most splendid in the kingdom. The plan of the new city, and the rebuilding of most of the churches, including S. Paul's, was committed to Sir Christopher Wren, who brought to his task the requisite energy, and the no less requisite self- confidence ; but who felt or affected a contempt for the architec- tural works of the mediaeval Church, which boded ill for the sacred edifices which were to start into renewed life under his hands. It is indeed greatly to be regretted that when so many churches were to be rebuilt, the style chosen should have been so unecclesiastical : but it would have been a subject of still deeper regret, if Wren, with his very imperfect knowledge of pointed architecture had affected that style for his churches. In some instances he imitated the Gothic forms and arrangements, but his imitations are always failures. Witness his western towers of Westminster Abbey, and his steeple of S. Dunstan's in the east. Still the name of Wren is a household word with Englishmen, and his crowning work is a glorious effort of human design and execution : nor is there any material of the history of the arts in those days more interesting than the professional documents which proceeded from his pen. I have transferred, therefore, to the Appendix to this chapter, his remarks on the style proper for the western towers of S. Peter's Abbey, and on the state of S. Paul's Cathedral after the fire. From Wren's time downwards till within a few years past, the only two classes into which churches can fairly be arranged, are those that aim at a religious character with or without suc- cess ; and those that do not fail in this object, because they do not aspire to attain it. 1 But I have not the smallest intention of entering into the detailed examination which would be requisite to give satisfactory examples of these two classes. Nor shall I dare to discuss the present prospects of ecclesi- 1 This arrangement is somewhere suggested in the " Ecclesiologist." 406 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. astical art, or to weigh the merits of those modern architects, who have at least partially succeeded in their endeavour to re- vive a truly ecclesiastical style. I shall, however, suggest one word in arrest of too severe a judgment on what has yet been done : — that it does not fall to the lot of the same person or the same generation, both to be first in action, and to profit by ex- perience. It is no fair disparagement of many noble works that they have aided the great development by their defects, as well as by their beauties. For the rest, if I may venture to hope that the present volume may work with those persons and cir- cumstances which are giving a healthful stimulus to the pre- sent revival of ecclesiastical art, it will be rather by carrying back the thoughts of those interested to the times which we must emulate, than by anticipating the success which may crown our future efforts. And let me not conceal my entire consciousness that I must at last fall far behind the merit of those who even in the smallest degree realize the ideal after which we are striving, either by their professional skill, or by well-directed munificence. The architect who has restored one church in the true spirit of a restorer, or built one church in the true spirit of a churchman, has done more to forward our com- mon object, than all the commendations of Alan of Walsingham, and of William of Wykeham, that were ever penned ; and one sacrifice, one offering on the altar, in which the sssthetic element is animated by a Christian spirit, is more than whole piles of description, and manuals, and histories. APPENDIX. I. A contemporary narrative of the burning of St. Paul's Steeple, in 1561, published in the Archceologia, Vol. XI. " The true reporte of the burning of the Steple and church of Paules, in London. " On Wednesday, beinge the fourthe daye of June, in the yeare of our Lord 1561, and in the thyrde year of thereigne of our Soveraygne Ladye Elizabeth, by the grace of God, Queene of Englande, Fraunce, and Ire- THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 407 land, Defender of the Faith, &c, between one and two of the clocke at afternoone, was scene a marveilous great fyrie lightning, and immediately insued a most terrible hydeous cracke of thunder, such as seldom hath been heard, and that by estimacion of sense, directlye over the citie of London. At which instance the corner of a turret of the steple of St. Martin's churche within Ludgate was torne, and divers great stones casten downe, and a hole broken throughe the roofe and timber of the said church by the fall of the same stones. " For divers persones in tyme of the saide tempest being on the river of Thamys, and others, beyng in the fieldes, nere adjoyning to ye citie, affirmed, that thei saw a long and a speare pointed flame of fier (as it were) runne through the toppe of the broche or shaft of Paules steple from the easte westwarde. And some of the parish of St. Martin's then being in the streate, dyd feele a marveylous strong ayre or whorlewynd, with a smel lyke brimstone coming from Paules church, and withal heard the rush of ye stones which fell frd their steeple into the churche. Be- twene iiij and five of the clocke, a smoke was espied, by divers, to breake oute under the bowle of the said shaft of Paules, and namely, by Peter Johnson, principall Registrer to the Bishop of Londo, who immediately brought word to the Bishop's house. But sodeinly after, as it were in a momente, the flame brake forth in a circle like a garlande rounde about the broche, about two yards to thestimacion of sight under the bowle of the said shaft, and increased in suche wise, that within a quarter of an howre, or little more, the crosse and the egle on the toppe fell downe upon the south crosse ile. The Lord Maior being sent for, and his breth- ren came with all spede possible, with ye Bishop of London, and others, for ye best way of remedy. And thither came also ye Lord Keper of the great seale, and the Lord Treasorer, who bv their wisedom and authoritie dyrectecl as good order, as in so great a comasio could possibly be. " Some there wer, preteding experience in warres, that couceled the re- manente of the steple to be shot down with canons, which counsel was not liked, as most perilous both for the dispersing of the fire, and destructio of houses and people ; other perceiving the steple to be past all recovery, considering the hugeness of the fier, and the dropping of the leade, thought beste to geat ladders and scale the churche, and with axes to hew down a space of the roofe of the churche to stay the fier, at least to save some part of the saide churche, which was concluded. But before the ladders and buckets could be brought, and things put in any order, and especially because the churche was of such height, that thei could not scale it, and no sufficiente number of axes could be had, ye laborers also being troubled with ye multitude of ydle gazers, the most part of the higheste roofe of the churche was on fier. " Fyrst, the fall of the crosse and egle fired the southe crosse ile, which ile was first consumed, the beames and brands of the steeple fell downe on every side, and fired the other thre partes, that is to saye, the chauncel or quier, the north ile, and the body of the churche, so that in one howres 408 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. space ye broch of the steple was brent downe to ye battlements, and the most part of ye highest roofe of the church likewise consumed. The state of the steple and churche seming both desperate, my Lord Mayor was ad- vised by one maister Winter, of ye admiraltie, to converte the most part of his care and provisio to preserve the Bishop's palace adjoyning to the north-west end of the church : least fro that house beinge large, the fier might sprede to the stretes adjoyning, whereupon the ladders, buckets, and laborers, were commanded thither, and by greate labor and diligence, a piece of the roofe of the north ile was cut down, and the fier so stayed, and by muche water, that parte quenched, and the said Bishop's house preserved. It pleased God also at the same tyme bothe to turne and calme the winde, which afore was vehemet, and continued stil high and greate in other partes without the citie. "There wer above v.c. persons yt laboured in carrying and filling water, and divers substancial citizens toke paynes as if thei had bene laborers, so did also divers and sondrye gentlemen, whose names wer not knowen to the writer hereof, but amongst other, the said M. Winter, and one Mr. Stranguish did both take notable paines in their own persons, and also much directed and encouraged other, and that not without great daiiger to theselves. In ye evening came the Lord Clinton, Lord Admiral, from the court at Grenewiche, whe the Queenes majesty, assone as the rage of the fier was espied by her majestye and others in the court, of the pitifull inclination and love that her gracious highnesse dyd beare both to ye said church, and ye citie, sent to assyst my Lorde Mayor for the suppressyng of the fyre, who with his wisdome, authority, and dili- gent travayl, did very much good therein. About x of the clocke the fyercenes of the fyre was past, the tymbre being fallen, and lyinge bren- ninge uppon the vaultes of stone, the vaultes yet (God be thanked) stand- ynge unperished : so as onelye the tymbre of the hole church was con- sumed, and the lead molten, savying the most part of the two lowe iles of the queare, and a piece of the north ile, and an other smal piece of ye southe, in the bodye of the churche. Notwithstandyng all which, it pleased the merciful God in His wrath to remebre His mercie, and to en- close the harme of this most fyerce and terrible fyre wythin the walles of thys one church, not extending any part of His wrath in this fyre uppon the rest of the citie, which to all reason and sence of man was subject to utter distruction. For in the hole city without the churche no stycke was kyndled surely e, notwithstanding that in diverse partes and stretes, and within the houses bothe adjoyning, and of a good distaunce, as in Fletestrete and Newgate market, by the violence of fyre, burninge coles of greate bignesse fell downe almoost as thicke as haylstones, and flawes of lead were blowen abrode into the gardins without yt citie, like flawes of snowe in bredthe, w'oute hurt, God be thanked, to any house or perso. Many fond talkes goe abrode of the original cause of this fier. Some say it was negligence of plumbers, wheras by due examination, it is proved that no plumbers or other workemen laboured in the churche for sixe THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 409 monethes before. Others suspect it was done by some wicked practice of wildfyer or gunpowder, but no just suspicions thereof by any examinacion can be founde hitherto. Some suspect conjurers and sorcerers, wherof there is also no great likelyhode. And if it hadde bene wrought yt waie, yet could not the devil have done it, without God's permissio, and to some purpose of His unsercheable judgemets, as appereth in the story of Job. The true cause, as it semeth, was the tepest by God's suffrance : for it cannot be otherwise gathered, but that at ye said great and terrible thunderclap, when St. Martin's steple was torne, the lightning, which by natural order smiteth ye highest, did first smite ye top of Paules steple, and entring in at the small holes, which have always remained open for building skaffoldes to the workes, and finding the timbers very olde and drie, did kindle the same, and so the fier increasing grew to a flame, and wrought ye effecte which folowed, most terrible then to behold and now most lamentable to looke on. " On Sonday folowing, beynge the viii day of June, the reverend in God, the Bishop of Duresme, at Paules crosse, made a learned and fruitful ser- mon, exhorting the auditory to a general repentance, and namely to humble obediece of the lawes and superior powers, which vertue is much decayed in these our daies. Seming to have intellygece from the Queenes highnes, that her Majestie intendeth that more severitie of lawes shall be executed against persons disobedyent as well in causes of religion as civil, to the great rejoysing of his auditors. He exhorted also hys audiece to take this as a generall warninge to the whole realme, and namelye to the citie of London, of some greater plage to folow, if amendmente of lyfe in all states did not ensue : He muche reproved those persons whiche woulde assigne the cause of this wrathe of God to any perticular state of me, or that were diligent to loke into other mens lyves, and could see no faultes in themselfes ; but wished that every man wold descend into himselfe, and say with David, Ego sum qui peccavi. I am he that hathe sinned, and so furth, to that effect very godlye. He also not onely reproved the pro- phanatyon of the said churche of Paules, of long time heretofore abused by walking, jangling, brawling, fighting, bargaining, &c, namely, in ser- mons and service time : but also auswered by the way to the objections of such evil-tunged persos, which do impute this token of God's deserved ire, to alteratio or rather reformatio of religio, declaring out of aucient re- cords and histories, ye like, yea and greater matters, had befallen in the time of superstitio and ignorance. For in the first year of King Stephe, not only the said churche of Paules was brent, but also a great part of the city, that is to say frd Londo bridge unto St. Clemets without Teple bar, was by fier cosumed. And in ye daies of King Hery ye VI. ye steple of Paules was also fired by lightning, although it was then staid by diligece of ye citizens, ye fier being the by likelyhode not so fierce. Many other suche like comon calamities he rehersed, whiche had happened in other coutries, both nigh to this realm, and far of, where the church of Rome hath most authority, and therefore concluded the surest way to be, yt 410 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. every man should judge, axamin, and amed himselfe, and embrace, beleve, and truely folow ye word of God, and earnestly to pray to God to turn away fro us His deserved wrath and indignation, wherof this His terrible work is a most certein warning, if we repent not unfeinedly. The whiche God grat maye come to passe in all estates and degrees, to ye glory of His name, and to our endlesse comfort, in Christ our Saviour. Amen. God save the Queene." II. Sir Christopher Wren's account of the state of S. Paul's Cathedral, after the Fire of London, 1666. From the Antiquarian Repertory. What time and weather had left entire in the old, and art in the new- repaired parts of this great pile of S. Pauls, the late calamitie of fire hath so weakned and defac'd, that it now appears like some antique ruine of 2000 years continuance : and to repaire it sufficiently, will be like the mending of ye Argo-navis, scarce any thing will at last be left of the old. The first decaies of it were great, from severall causes; first, from the originall building itself : for it was not well shaped and design'd for the firme bearing of its owne vault, how massy soever ye walls seemed to be, nor were the materialls good : for it seem'd to have been built out of the stone of some other antient ruines, the walls being of 2 severall sorts of freestone, and those small; and ye coar wthin was raggestone, cast in rough wth morter and putty, wch is not a durable way of building, unless there had been that peculiar sort of banding wth some thorowe courses, wch is necessary in this kind of fillingwork, but was omitted in this fabrick. This accusation belongs chiefly to the west, north and south parts. The quire was of later and better worke, not inferiour to most Gothick fabricks of yt age. The tower, though it had ye effects of an ill manner of building and small stones, and fillingwork, yet was it more carefully banded, and cramped wth much iron. A second reason of ye decaies, wch appeared before ye last fire, was in probabilitie the former fire, wch consumed ye whole roof in ye reign of Q. Elizt. The fall of timber then upon ye vault, was certainly one maine cause of ye cracks wch appeared in ye vault, and of ye spreading out of ye walls above 10 inches in some places fro their true p'pendicular, as it now appears more manifestly. This giving ovt of ye walls was en- deavoured to be corrected by ye artist of the last repaires, who plac'd his new case of Portland stone truely p'pendicular, and if he had p'ceeded wth casing it wthin, ye whole had been tolerably corrected. But now even this new work is gone away fro its p'pendicular allso by this 2d fall of ye roofe in this last fire. This is most manifest in ye north-west ile. The second ruines are they that have put the restauration past remedy, ye effects of wch I shall briefly enumerate. THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 411 First, the portick is totally deprived of yt excellent beauty and strength wch time alone and weather could have no more overthrowne than the naturall rocks, so great and good were ye materialls, and so skillfully were they lay'd after a true Roman manner. But so impatient is ye Portland- stone of fire, that many tunns of stone are scaled off, and ye columns flawed quite through. Next ye south-west corner, one of ye vast pillars of ye body of ye church, wth all yt it supported, is fallen. All along the body of ye church ye pillars are more given out than they were before the fire, and more flawed towards ye bottome, by ye burning of ye goods belowe, and ye timber fallen fro above. This further spreading of ye pillars wthin hath also carried out the walls of ye iles, and reduced the circular ribbs of ye vaults of ye iles to be of a forme, wch to ye eye appears distorted and compressed, especially in the north-west ile of ye body of the church. The tower & ye parts next about it have suffered the least, for there by reason that ye walls lying in form of a cross give a firme and immoveable buttment each to other, and they stand still in their position, and support their vaults ; wch shows manifestly, that ye fall of ye timber alone could not break ye vaults, unless where ye same concussion had force enough to make ye walls allso give out. And this is ye reason of ye great desolac'on wch appears in the new quire, for there ye falling vaults in spite of all the small butresses, hath broken them short, or dislocated the stouter of them, & overthrowing ye north wall and pillars and consequently ye vaults of ye north-east ile, hath broken open the vaults of S. Faith's (though those were of very great strength) but irresistible is ye force of so many 1000 tunns, augmented by the height of ye fall. Having shewn in part the deplorable condic'on of o patient, we are to consult of ye cure, if possibly art may effect it. And herein we must imitate ye physitian, who, when he finds a totall decay of nature, bends his skill to a palliation, to give respite for a better settlemt of ye estate of ye patient. The question is then, where best to begin this kind of practise, that is, to make a quire for present use. It will worst of all be effected in the new quire, for there the walls and pillars being falln, it will cost a large sume to restore them to their former height, and before this can be effected, the very substrucc'on and repaire of S. Faith's will cost so much, that I shall but fright this age wth ye computac'on of that wch is to be done in the darke, before any thing will appear for ye use desired. The old quire seems to some a convenient place, and yt wch will be most easily effected ; because ye vault there looks firme, or easily reparable, as far as to ye place where was once ye old pulpit. But this designe will not be wthout very materiall objections. First, the place is very short and little between ye stone-skreen and the breach, and only capable of a little quire, not of an auditory. 412 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. And if the auditory be made wthout, yet secondly, all ye adjacent places are under the mines of a falling tower, wch every day throws off smaller scales, and in frosts will yield such showers of the outside-stones (if no greater parts come downe wth tempests,) that ye new roofs (yet to be made) will be broken up, if no further mischiefs ensue. Thirdly, you are to make such a dismall procession through mines to come thither, that the very passage will be a penance. Fourthly, this cannot be effected wth out considerable expense of making of partic'on-walls to ye topp to sever this part on every side from the ruines, and covering wth timber and lead these four short parts of ye cross next ye tower, and covering the tower also, that is, if you make room for ye auditory, as well as the quire, the quire itself being very little. These waies being found inconvenient and expensefull, either of taking out a part, where ye new quire was, or where the old quire is, with the parts west, north, and south next the tower, as far as the vaults stand ; it remains that we seek it in the body of the church. And this is that wch I should humbly advise, as the properest and cheapest way of making a sufficient quire and auditory, after this manner. I would take the lesser north and south door for the entrances, and leaving two intercolumniations eastward, and three or four westward, I would there make partic'on-walls of the fallen stone upon the place. The east part above the doores may be contriv'd into a quire, the west into the auditory. I would lay a timber-roof as low as the bottoms of the upper windows, wth a flat fretted railing. The lead sav'd out of the burning will more than cover it. Of iron and of pavemt there is enough for all uses. The roof lying low, will not appeare above the walls, and since we cannot mend this great mine, we will not disfigure it, but that it still shall have its full motives to work, if possible, upon this, or the next ages ; and yet wthin it shall have all convenience and light (by turning the second story of arches into windows,) and a beauty durable to the next two cen- turies of years, and yet prove so cheap, that between 3000£. & 4000£. shall effect it all in one summer. And having wth this ease obtained a p'sent cathedrall, there will be time to consider of a more durable and noble fabrick, to be made in the place of the tower and eastern parts of the church, when the minds of men, now contracted to many objects of necessary charge, shall by God's blessing be more widened, after a happy restauration, both of the buildings and wealth of the city and nation. In the meane while, to derive, if not a stream, yet some little drills of charitie this way, or at least to preserve that allready obtained, from being diverted, it may prove ill advise, to seem to begin something of this new fabrick. But I confess this cannot well be put in execution, wthout taking downe all that part of the ruines, wch whether it be yet seasonable to do, we must leave to our superiours. THE POST-REFORMATION PERIOD. 413 HI. The following extracts are made from Sir Christopher Wren's Letter to Atterbury, then (1713) Dean of Westminster, as affording not only an account of the state of Westminster Abbey, in his day, but also sufficient insight into his own feeling about Gothic architecture, which, from his in- fluence on church building, is a matter of importance. The whole letter is given in the Parentalia, but these quotations are made from a larger ex- tract in Neale's Westminster. " The Saracen mode of building, seen in the East, soon spread over Eu- rope, and particularly in France ; the fashions of which nation we affected to imitate in all ages, even when we were at enmity with it. Nothing was thought magnificent that was not high beyond measure, with the flutter of archbuttresses, (so we call the sloping arches that poise the higher vault- ings of the nave ;) the Romans always concealed their butments, whereas the Normans thought them ornamental. These, I have observed, are the first things that occasion the ruin of cathedrals, from being so exposed to the air and weather ; the coping, which cannot defend them, first failing ; and if they give way the vault must spread. Pinnacles are of no use, and as little ornament ; the pride of a very high roof, raised above reasonable pitch, is not for duration, for the lead is apt to slip ; but we are tied to this form, and must be contented with original faults in the first design. But that which is most to be lamented is the unhappy choice of materials ; the stone is decayed four inches deep, and falls off perpetually in great scales. I find, after the Conquest, all our artists Were fetched from Normandy ; they loved to work in their own Caen stone, which is more beautiful than durable : this was found expensive to bring hither, so they thought Rye- gate stone, in Surrey, the nearest like their own, being a stone that would saw and work like wood ; but it is not durable, as is manifest; and they used this for the ashler of the whole fabric, which is now disfigured in the highest degree : this stone takes in water, which, being frozen, scales off, whereas good stone gathers a crust, and defends itself, as many of our English freestones do. And though we have also the best oak timber in the world, yet these senseless artificers would work (as in Westminster Hall, and other places,) their own chesnuts from Normandy : that timber is not natural to England ; it works finely, but sooner decays than oak. The roof in the Abbey is oak, but mixed with chesnut, and wrought after a bad Norman manner, that does not secure it from stretching and da- maging the walls : and the water of the gutters is ill carried off. ... . " I have yet said nothing of King Henry the Vllth's chapel, a nice em- broidered work, and performed with tender Caen stone ; and though lately built, in comparison, is so eaten up by our weather, that it begs for some compassion, which I hope the sovereign power will take, as it is the regal sepulture. 414 ECCLESIASTICAL ARCHITECTURE IN ENGLAND. " I begin, as I said, to set down what is necessary for completing the repairs ; though part whereof I can but guess at, because I cannot yet come to the north side, to make a full discovery of the defects there ; but I hope to find it rather better than the south side, for it is the vicissitudes of heat and cold, drought and moisture, that rot all materials more than the extremities that are constant, of any of these accidents. This is mani- fest in timber, which if always underground, and wet, never decays, other- wise Venice and Amsterdam would fall. It is the same in lead work; for the north side of a steep roof is usually much less decayed than the south, and the same is commonly seen in stone-work. Besides, the buttresses here are more substantial than those of the south side, which were indis- creetly altered for the sake of the cloyster; and I find some emendations have been made about eighty years since, but not well " And now, having given a summary account of what will perfect the repairs, let me add what I wish might be done to render those parts with a proper aspect, which were left abruptly imperfect by the last builders, when the monastery was dissolved by King Henry VIII. " It was plainly intended originally to have had a steeple, the beginnings of which appear on the corners of the cross, but left off before it rose so high as the ridge of the roof; and the vault of the choir under it is only lath and plaister, now rotten, and must be taken care of. Lest it should be doubted whether the four pillars below be able to bear a steeple, be- cause they seem a little swayed inward, I have considered how they may be unquestionably secured, so as to support the greatest weight that need be laid upon them ; and this after a manner that will add to their shape and beauty. " The pillars being once well secured from further distortion, it will be necessary to confirm all by adding more weight upon them, that is, by building a tower according to the original intention of the architect. In my opinion, the tower should be continued to, at least, as much in height above the roof as it is in breadth ; and if a spire be added to it, it will give a proper grace to the whole fabric, and the west end of the city which seems to want it. I have made a design, which will not be very expensive, but light, and still in the Gothic form, and of a style with the rest of the structure, which I would strictly adhere to throughout the whole inten- tion : to deviate from the old form would be to run into a disagreeable mixture, which no person of a good taste could relish. I have varied a little in giving twelve sides to the spire instead of eight, for reasons to be discerned upon the model. The angles of pyramids in the Gothic archi- tecture were usually enriched with the flower the botanists call calceolus, 1 which is a proper form to help workmen to ascend on the outside to amend 1 This is by no means a happy at- tempt to appropriate the conventional forms of Gothic architecture to a na- tural prototype. Mr. Browne in his valuable work on York Minster has attempted the same thing, in many instances, but with like success. THE POST- REFORMATION PERIOD. 415 any defects, without raising large scaffolds upon every slight occasion. I have done the same, it being of so good use, as well as an agreeable ornament. " The next thing to be considered is, to finish what was left undone at the west front. It is evident that the two towers there were left imper- fect ; the one much higher than the other, though still too low for bells, the sounds of which are stifled by the height of the roof above them : they ought certainly to be carried to an equal height, one story above the ridge of the roof, still continuing the Gothic manner in the stone- work and tracery. Something must be done to strengthen the west window, which is crazy ; the pediment is only boarded, but ought undoubtedly to be of stone. I have given such a design as I conceive may be suitable for this part " The great north window had been formerly in danger of ruin, but was upheld, and stopped up for the present with plaister : it will be most ne- cessary to rebuild this with Portland stone, to answer the south rose-win- dow, which was well rebuilt about forty years since. The staircases at the corners must be new ashlered, and pyramids set upon them conform- able to the old style, to make the whole of a piece. I have therefore made a design, in order to restore it to its proper shape, as first intended, but which was indiscreetly tampered with some years since, by patching on a little Doric passage before the great window, and cropping off the pyra- mids, and covering the staircases with very improper roofs of timber and lead, which can never agree with any other part of the design. " For all these new additions I have prepared perfect draughts and models, such as I conceive may agree with the original scheme of the old architect, without any modern mixtures to show my own inventions ; in like manner as I have, among the parochial churches of London, given some few examples (where I was obliged to deviate from a better style), which appear not ungraceful, but ornamental, to the east part of the city ; and it is to be hoped by the public care, the west part also, in good time, will be as well adorned ; and surely by nothing more properly than a lofty spire, and western towers to Westminster Abbey/' JOSEPH MASTERS, A I.OKRSGATE STREET, LONDON. * GETTY CENTER LIBRARY 3 3125 00760 7795 Jp if mum WW MM