Catalogue of the Collection of Pictures and Bronzes IN THE POSSESSION OF MR. OTTO BEIT INTRODUCTION AND DESCRIPTIONS DR. WILHELM BODE DIRECTOR-GENERAL OF THE ROYAL MUSEUMS AT BERLIN LONDON PRIVATELY PRINTED AT THE CHISWICK PRESS Of this Catalogue only One Hundred and Twenty-Five Copies have been printed This is No. 26 The Photogravure plates in this Catalogue are by the Berlin Photographic Company of London and Berlin. The plates and letterpress are printed on handmade Japanese paper pro- cured from Tokio. TWf j P*W. INTRODUCTION iORKS of art, and more especially pidfures, have always been regarded as necessary adjundls to every well-appointed English house since the days when Englishmen, making the “ grand tour,” availed themselves of their opportunities for acquiring art treasures in the Netherlands, Italy, France, and Spain (in many cases diredf from private owners), works which in those days were sold for nominal sums, and sometimes were pradlically given away. Ridicule has been freely cast upon the English mania for picking up curios of every description as mementoes of foreign travel, nevertheless it is to this propensity that we owe the preservation of countless works of art which would otherwise have perished; while the descendants of these colledfors have thus become possessed of an inheritance, the value of which in these days is almost incalculable. Pidures thus acquired on the continent, added to innumerable family portraits by the best foreign artists, and later by the leading masters of the British School, gradually filled the halls, corridors, and galleries in the country seats and town houses of the English nobility and gentry, and in this way a large number of important private colledions of pidures came to be formed in Great Britain during the last two hundred years. This time-honoured custom still prevails; of late indeed, an outcry has been raised against the drain of works of art from England to foreign countries, and notably to America; but those who raise this objedion, overlook the fad that quite as many, and as a rule extremely choice examples, have been brought into this country from the continent. The works of art brought to England by two colledors alone. Sir Richard Wallace and Mr. George Salting, far out- weigh in importance all that has left these shores for foreign countries in the last decades. V VI INTRODUCTION Both the methods of colledting and displaying works of art in England are essentially different now from what they were two hundred years ago, or even at the beginning of the last century. Formerly the walls of rooms and corridors were hung from floor to ceiling with picilures of the most heterogeneous nature; the quality of the work being rarely, if ever, taken into consideration, as may still be seen in many colledtions in old country houses. In the nineteenth century colledlors began to hang their pidlures in one or more large rooms, lighted from above after the manner of a pidure-gallery; but both these methods have now been abandoned. The aim of the modern colledor is to acquire masterpieces in the best possible state of preservation, which would harmonize with the style of his house. He seeks to exhibit these pidures in the most favourable light, with due regard to their decorative effed and in such a manner as to heighten the air of refinement and the aesthetic charm of the surroundings. Foreigners who settle in London, and have both the time and the disposition to become colledors, have usually adopted this excellent method, and the late Mr. Alfred Beit was no exception to the rule, when in 1895 he began to adorn his stately house in Park Lane, then recently completed, with works of art on a scale of great magnificence. Mr. Alfred Beit was not one of those to whom the acquisition of works of art becomes an all-engrossing passion, and he was therefore able to steer clear of the errors into which the professional colledor is prone to fall. The sheer pleasure of colleding never induced him to make daily acquisitions which often result in the accumulation of a great number of works of art of doubtful authenticity; nor was he beguiled by preconceived notions or any pronounced leanings. His principal aim was to render his house artistically beautiful, and in seleding works of art, his first consideration was always the attradliveness of the subjedt represented, and the decorative value of the composition. False economy never deterred him from making purchases; but on the other hand he was never recklessly extravagant. His acquisitions were always made with deliberate and calm judgement, and good advice was never disregarded by him. He had already gained considerable experience when collecting on a much more modest scale, for his house at Hamburg, which he had built some six years earlier. The adornment of the house in Park Lane was therefore extremely choice in quality, and the whole presented an aspeCt of beauty blended with comfort from which, moreover, a personal note was not lacking. INTRODUCTION vii for the owner always resolutely set his face against being hampered by slavish adherence to the prevailing fashion, either in the building or in the arrangement of his house. In some of the upper rooms, indeed, he simply reproduced the plan and disposition of the Chambers in Pall Mall, which he had inhabited some ten years previously, and here he re-hung the first modest fruits of his zeal as a colledor; for no considerations of architedlural fitness would have induced him to part from surroundings to which he had become attached during a residence of ten years and with which many old associations were bound up. Thus the contents of the house in Park Lane furnished a record of Mr. Alfred Beit’s gradual development as a colledor. But he was not long permitted to enjoy his treasures and the colledions which he had formed, nor was he able to complete them as he would have wished. The storm and stress of life in South Africa, the struggle for the supremacy of the British Flag, and for the incorporation with the Empire of a new and vast colonial dominion, among the founders of which Mr. Alfred Beit must certainly be reckoned, had undermined his health, and in July igo6 he succumbed to a painful illness. His colledion, with the exception of some important items which he bequeathed to different museums and to friends, passed to his only surviving brother and sole heir, Mr. Otto Beit. The house in Park Lane, having been built for a bachelor, was unsuitable as a residence for himself and his family, and he therefore removed the entire colledlion to his own house in Belgrave Square (a Georgian edifice decorated internally in the French style of the Louis XV and Louis XVI periods), making considerable alterations in order to render the house more suitable for its reception. In these excellently lighted apartments the pidlures and art treasures on the whole are seen more eifedtively and show to greater advantage. Mr. Otto Beit, following his brothers example, has gradually eliminated inferior works of art, and has replaced them by pidtures of first-rate merit, thus increasing the value of the colledlion and adding considerably to the decorative effedt of the rooms. Besides augmenting the colledfion of Dutch Masters he has also acquired some highly important examples of the English School for the adornment of the dining-room. Special attention has also been paid by him to improving the quality of the art treasures at Tewin Water. This fine eighteenth-century country house near Welwyn (the interior of which had just been arranged by its former INTRODUCTION Vlll owner in the style of the Renaissance) was purchased by Mr. Alfred Beit who, by his acquisitions in Italian furniture, majolica, old tapestries, and good pidures, especially of the Renaissance, was able to introduce yet further improvements into the charming and tasteful arrangement of the house. His brother has pursued the same course, so that Tewin Water now contains a really admirable colledion, more especially of Italian paintings of the Quattro and Cinquecento. The writer of these lines has always taken a personal interest in the colledion, almost as great as that of the owner himself. His long friendship of many years standing with both brothers, enabled him to foster their taste for early art, and to assist them adively, and with pradical advice. He is moreover in part responsible for the contents and charader of the colledion, and it therefore affords him the utmost satisfadion to give this general survey and account of it as a whole and to describe in detail some of its principal treasures. CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION v LIST OF PLATES xi ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE TEXT xv THE PAINTINGS i THE BRONZES 51 INVENTORY OF THE COLLECTION; Paintings .......... 71 Miniature Portraits in Oil . . . . . . .101 Antique Bronze . . . . . . . . .106 Italian Bronzes of the Renaissance . . . . .106 Plastic Works . , . . . . . . .123 Tapestries . . . . . . . . . .127 Clocks . . . . . . . . . .129 Enamels . . . . . . . . . .131 Miscellaneous Objects . . . . . . . .132 Recent Additions . . . . . . . .140 b LIST OF PLATES PAINTINGS BARTOLOME ESTEBAN MURILLO REFERRED TO ON PAGE I. The Prodigal Son in the Harlot’s House 2 II. The Prodigal as a Swineherd ..... 2 FRANCISCO JOSE DE GOYA Y LUCIENTES III. Portrait of Dona Antonia Zarate .... ■ 2 , 3 ° REMBRANDT HARMENSZ VAN RIJN IV. Portrait of a Man ....... 6 NICOLAES MAES V. The Milkmaid ........ 7 JAN VERMEER OF DELFT VI. The Love Letter ....... 9 GABRIEL METSU VII. The Letter Writer ....... VIII. The Letter Reader ....... ■ 11-13 • 11-13 JAN STEEN IX. The Marriage in Cana ...... 14 ADRIAEN VAN OSTADE X. The Adoration of the Shepherds .... XL Peasants dancing in a Tavern ..... 16 16 ISAAK VAN OSTADE XII. The Ford ........ 18 SALOMON VAN RUYSDAEL XIII. River Landscape ....... h 2 18 LIST OF PLATES xii JACOB VAN RUISDAEL XIV. The Castle of Bentheim . . . . . ig XV. A Rough Sea . . . . . . . . ig MEINDERT HOBBEMA XVI. The Path on the Dyke . . . . . . 21 AERT VAN DER NEER XVII. Winter Scene. Skaters on a frozen Canal ... 22 JAN VAN DE CAPPELLE XVIII. Winter Scene. Breaking the Ice on a frozen Canal . 23 JAN VAN DER HEYDEN XIX. The City Gate ........ 24 PHILIPS WOUVERMAN XX. A Rustic Wedding, or Fete before a Village Inn . . 24 FRANS HALS XXL The Young Flute Player ...... 26 XXII. The Lute Player ....... 27 DAVID TENIERS THE YOUNGER XXIII. Rural Fete . . . . . . . . . 28 JEAN MARC NATTIER XXIV. Mme. Victoire, daughter of Louis XV . . . . 2g SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS XXV. Lady Talbot . . . . . . . . 31 XXVI. Lady Decies and her Son . . . . . 31 THOMAS GAINSBOROUGH XXVII. Mme. Bacelli, the Dancer . . . . . . 32 XXVIII. Hon. Mrs. Watson ....... 33 XXIX. The Cottage Girl . . . . , . . 33 SIR HENRY RAEBURN XXX. Sir John Clerk and his Wife, Rosemary Dacre 37 LIST OF PLATES RICHARD PARKES BONINGTON XXXI. On the Beach ....... GIUSEPPE PORTA, called SALVIATI XXXII. Portrait of a Man ...... PAOLO VERONESE.!’ (Ascribed to) XXXIII. Portrait of Count Alessandro Alberti JACOPO ROBUSTI, called TINTORETTO XXXIV. A Venetian Senator ...... SEBASTIANO LUCIANI, called SEBASTIANO DEL PIOMBO XXXV. Portrait of a Woman as St. Lucy MARTEN VAN HEEMSKERK XXXVI. Portraits of a Man and his Wife SIR ANTHONY VAN DYCK XXXVII. Portrait of Van der Heyden xiii REFERRED TO ON PAGE 39 45 • 41, 48 46 50 TERRA-COTTA MINO DA FIESOLE XXXVIII. Madonna AND Child BRONZES PIER JACOPO ATARI BONACOLSI, called ANTICO XXXIX. Apollo ..... FLORENTINE, XVI CENTURY XL. Two Children holding a Goose by the Neck . XLI. The Startled Boy ...... XLII. Cupid blindfolded on a Dolphin, about to draw his Bow 59 61 60 64 ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE TEXT PAINTINGS DIEGO RODRIGUEZ DA SILVA Y VELAZQUEZ PACE The Kitchen Maid ......... 2 JAN VERMEER OF DELFT Girl playing the Spinet ........ 3 (9) GERARD TERBORCH Portrait of a Lady ......... 10 ISAAK VAN OSTADE The Pedlar .......... 17 JACOB VAN RUISDAEL The Cornfield .......... 20 JEAN BAPTISTE GREUZE Bust of a Child ....... 3 ° SIR HENRY RAEBURN Portrait of Mrs. Cay ....... 32 (37) GEORGE ROMNEY Portrait of Mrs. Henry Ainslie and her Child .... 3 + JOHN HOPPNER Portrait of Countess Poulett ....... 36 JOHN OPIE The Peasant’s Family ...... 38 FLORENTINE SCHOOL. Early XVI century. Formerly ascribed to RIDOLFO GHIRLANDAIO The Adoration of the Shepherds .... XV XVI ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE TEXT FLORENTINE SCHOOL. Last quarter of the XV century. (Connefted with DOMENICO GHIRLANDAIO) The Adoration of the Shepherds ...... 43 (42) LORENZO DI CREDI The Allegory of Chastity ........ 45 (43) FRANCESCO UBERTINI, called BACCHIACCA The Lute Player ......... 47 (45) GIOVANNI ANTONIO BAZZI, called IL SODOMA The Holy Family ......... 49 (46) BONIFAZIO DEI PITATI Allegory of the Pursuit of Fame . . . . . 71 (48) BRONZES ALESSANDRO LEOPARDI Mortar ........... 51(58) ANDREA BRIOSCO, called RICCIO Equestrian Figure ......... 55 (54-56) RICCIO (Workshop of) Two-handled Bowl on godrooned Foot ..... 57 JACOPO SANSOVINO Madonna and Child with the little St. John .... 62 Door Knocker . . . . . . . . . . 63 LORENZO BERNINI Salt Cellar, Triton supporting a Shell ..... 68 VENETIAN. XVI century Circular Casket ......... 70 THE PAINTINGS N forming his colledlion Mr. Alfred Beit, like his brother, the present owner, made it a sine qua 7 ion that the works of art which he acquired should harmonize with their surroundings. Hence the objedls which adorn the house in Belgrave Square (most of which were formerly in Park Lane) as well as those in the country house at Tewin Water, were chosen more especially from the point of view of suitability to their milieu, and consist principally of furni- ture, bronzes, majolica, and paintings. The seledlion in the case of pictures was almost exclusively confined to examples by painters whose works were more particularly adapted to the decoration of the reception and other rooms, that is to say examples of the Dutch schools of the XVII century, and of the English and French schools of the XVIII century. At Tewin Water, on the other hand, the early Italian masters predominate. The pidfures in Mr. Beit’s study are all by the same master, and belong to a school which is otherwise almost unrepresented in the colledion. They illustrate the history of the “Prodigal Son,” and are the work of Murillo. These six paintings, which are of medium size, form a strikingly beautiful room decoration, a purpose for which they were originally intended, having been probably destined for the hall of some religious order at Seville. Mr. Alfred Beit acquired them at the sale of Lord Dudley’s pidlures, five of them having been bought by that colledfor from the Salamanca Gallery in 1867. The sixth, “ The Return of the Prodigal,” which had been presented to the Vatican Gallery in 1856 by Queen Isabella, B 2 THE PAINTINGS was obtained by Lord Dudley by special arrangement with Pope Pius IX, who received in exchange two valuable Italian pidlures. The great Spanish artist has here treated a theme which the Dutch and Flemish genre-painters of his day, or of a rather earlier period, had represented with prediledlion. Murillo may, to some extent, have been influenced by these representations, but how widely different is his conception and treatment of the parable. The Netherlandish artists, those of the Spanish provinces as well as those of the free States in the Low Countries, were wont to choose this parable because it afforded them an opportunity of treating the subje<5l from the standpoint of pure genre-painting, and for this reason the subject of the “ Prodigal in the Harlot’s House ” found most favour with them. Murillo, too, narrates the parable in the spirit of his own day, clothes it in Spanish garb, and imparts to it a thoroughly Spanish setting. At the same time his conception is simple and impressive, the different incidents are represented in the true spirit of monumental art and all trivial detail and genre-like by-play, such as are met with in similar pidtures of the Flemish School, are omitted. Murillo’s “ Prodigal ” is never devoid of Spanish grandezza even in his moments of deepest degradation, when clothed in the tattered garb of a swine- herd. In “The Feast in the Harlot’s House” he has the stately bearing of a prince, and the young girl at his side, who gazes tenderly at him, is a Spanish beauty of high degree, lull of dignity and modest reserve. Both pictures show the artist at his best, in tone and colouring as well as in all other particulars. The Beit Collection contains a few other Spanish pictures, fine works by the greatest masters of the school : a female portrait by Goya, to which we shall return when dealing with the English portraits, as it hangs with them in the Boudoir, and an early genre picture by Velazquez, “The Kitchen Maid,” a realistic subjeCt for which he had a special predilection in the days when, as a youth of about twenty, he began to paint at Seville under the influence of Zurbaran. The composition is of the utmost simplicity: a young girl, unlovely of face and clad in slovenly attire, stands behind a kitchen table strewn with common pots and pans — a picture devoid of any outward beauty, meagre, inadequate (as a composition), yet nevertheless a masterpiece by reason of its astonishing truth and the refinement of observation which it displays, notably as regards the values; a work which appeals to modern impressionists in a far higher degree than would the most beautiful work of Raphael. THE PAINTINGS 3 Apart from the English XVIII century portraits, the main portion of the Beit Colledion consists, as is the case with nearly all the private colleftions of old masters in England, of works of the Flemish schools of the XVII century, and more particularly of examples by Dutch masters. No other pidlures — even from the standpoint of dimensions and subjedls treated — are so well adapted for the adornment of a room as the works of this school. By no other school were so many works for private owners produced, and of none other were there so many examples existing and available for purchase, at least in former days. For the English colleftor Holland, and afterwards Paris, where numerous Dutch pidlures were brought together, were the nearest and best markets for the acquisition of pidures. For these reasons English colledors have always THE PAINTINGS shown a preference for Dutch pidtures, even at a time when the acquisition of Italian masters was more in accordance with the taste and prevailing artistic tendencies of the day. Of the pictures by Raphael, Titian, Correggio, or other masters of the period when Italian art was at its zenith, the number purchasable has always been extremely small, as compared with those by Rembrandt, Rubens, Ruysdael, and the Dutch genre-painters. The choice of artists has generally been determined by the taste prevailing during particular epochs. Painters of finished execution like Gerard Dou or Frans Mieris; witty raconteurs like Jan Steen and Philips Wouvermans, or masters of landscape art such as Jan Both, Ludolf Backhuizen and many others, were the painters most in vogue fifty or sixty years ago; but their art appeals to the modern spirit in painting — with its leaning towards breadth of pidtorial handling and telling effedls of light and atmosphere — in a far less degree than does that of Pieter de Hooch or Vermeer of Delft, of Albert Cuyp or Jan van der Capelle. The paintings of these last-named artists, to which little or no attention was formerly paid, are now much sought after, and their value, as compared with what it was half a century ago, has increased ten, and even a hundred- fold. Works by some of these artists are indeed scarcely obtainable now, and the best are for the most part safeguarded in public colledtions. Mr. Alfred Beit was therefore unable to acquire as many examples by these masters as he desired owing to the high standard which he always maintained in his gallery. Of late years, however, Mr. Otto Beit has been fortunate enough to be able to fill most of these gaps; all the great masters of the Dutch school are now represented in the collec^Iion, and by veritable masterpieces. Foremost amongst them all is Rembrandt, that great master who brought Dutch art in all its bearings to its highest development, and who, by the individuality of his work, may be said to have exercised a determining influence upon the development of the art and culture of the whole human race. The agricultural crisis in England in the seventies and eighties was the cause of radical changes in the ownership of many English colledions, and numerous works of Rembrandt came into the market at that period. The limited knowledge of the master then prevailing, and the fadl that dealing in works of art had not then reached the high level to which it has since attained THE PAINTINGS 5 in England and in part also in France, are accountable for the ridiculously low prices then obtained for some of these pidlures even if they were not regarded as altogether unsaleable. About ten years ago, however, a readlion set in. It is almost impossible in the present day to find a piilure by Rembrandt, and if by chance an example appears in the Sale Room, it is almost always an early work or some small study of comparatively little importance. Among the latter are numerous examples which, if they do not merit the negleft and even contempt which would have been meted out to them in former days, are certainly not worthy of the high value now put upon them. Many of these studies, especially those dating from the early years of Rembrandt’s aflivity, were executed solely with a view to reproducing certain effedls of light or some transient mood or phase of thought, with the utmost rapidity; hence they are often slight and even crude in execution, and assuredly are not worth the price (often ^2,000 and more) asked and frequently obtained. As a rule they are simply curiosities, interesting only for the part they play in the develop- ment of Rembrandt’s art. Mr. Alfred Beit purchased his Rembrandts (originally he owned four, but one has recently been exchanged) at an opportune moment, and before American competition had caused the excessive, and often most unwarrant- able, rise in the price of pictures generally, and more especially of works by Rembrandt. Two of the pidlures which are still in the colledlion are early works by the master ; one represents “ S. Francis praying.” It is doubtful whether this is the pifture once in the Orleans Gallery ; the engraving of that work differs slightly from it but agrees exadlly with an unsigned replica in the Johnson Colledlion at Philadelphia. The piffure in the Beit Colledlion is signed and dated 1637. sombre, brownish colouring, almost uniform in tone, and in the thin glazing of the dark shadows, the pidure is a charaderistic example of this period. Proof of this is afforded by comparison with pidures like the “Tobias” of 1637 in the Louvre, “Christ and the Magdalen” of 1638 at Buckingham Palace, and others ; but the Beit pidure lacks the intimacy of conception, the careful execution, and the brilliancy of tone which render these small compositions veritable masterpieces of art. Pidorial effed is what the painter has here aimed at, for the subjed in itself had little interest for him. On the rare occasions when he took for his theme some legend of the 6 THE PAINTINGS saints, he sought to heighten the interest by dramatic touches, by giving prominence to the landscape, or by introducing some special pidtorial effed; for as a staunch Calvinist the subjeft, as such, did not appeal to him. A second pidlure, a Biblical subjedl — “The Tribute Money” — was produced eight years earlier; it bears the monogram of the master and the date 1629. Here for the first time the young artist subordinates his figures to the general effect of space, and thus develops that peculiar and mysterious chiaroscuro which in the well-known “Simeon in the Temple” (painted shortly after) attains complete freedom and produces so striking an effe£t. The movement and expression in this little picture, more especially in the figure of the Saviour, still reveal that somewhat exaggerated sentiment so chara£leristic of the early work of this master. The third pidure by Rembrandt — a masterpiece — is a portrait of his last period, dated 1667. This is the latest work by Rembrandt at present known, with the exception of his portrait of himself formerly belonging to Sir Audley Neeld and now in the Marcus Kappel Colledtion in Berlin, which was painted shortly before the artist’s death in 1669. The young man plainly garbed in black, with long locks of fair hair and a round, fresh-coloured face, looks like a prosperous master-baker. The woman holding a handkerchief, in the English National Gallery, painted in the previous year, 1666, might, judging from the type and the costume, represent his wife, though the dimensions of this pidhire are smaller. The similarity in illumination of both pifrures — the strongest light falling in each case upon the head and hands — the warm flesh-tones, the vigorous pastose handling, which, though producing the effedt of broad brush- work, in point of facfl reveals the most careful workmanship and masterly execution — qualities typical of works belonging to the last years of this great artist — render it probable that the two were companion pifrures. The tendency of painting in the middle of the XIX century, with its predilection for severe drawing, careful execution, and themes abounding in illustrative detail, and the prevailing taste for art of this calibre, caused Rembrandt’s late works often to pass unnoticed and even entirely unrecognized. It is only in the present day that they are gradually coming more into favour and are now even preferred to the works of his middle period. Some decades ago only a few great master- pieces of this late period — such as the “ Staalmeesters ” and the so-called “ Jewish Bride ” in the Rijks Museum at Amsterdam, and “ The Family ” in THE PAINTINGS 7 the Brunswick Gallery — were known and generally accepted; but now about seventy piilures can be ascribed, either with certainty or at least with great probability, to the last ten years of the Master’s life. Among those pupils and followers of Rembrandt who devoted themselves chiefly to the representation of scenes from domestic life, all the principal masters are met with in the Beit Colleftion : Nicolas Maes, Pieter de Hooch, and Jan Vermeer of Delft, the latter being represented moreover by two examples. These three nearly contemporary masters, only one of whom — Nicolas Maes — had a comparatively long life, all treated subjedls of a very similar charader; simple scenes of everyday life in a Dutch interior, the “ home life ” — for which the Dutch have the same feeling as the English — with all its touches of individuality and comfort, with its atmosphere of peace, contentment, and cheerful well-being. Each of these three artists has his own individual conception of this phase of domestic life, but the one who most nearly approaches Rembrandt in mise-en-scene, colouring, and chiaroscuro, is his pupil, Nicolas Maes. His representations of young mothers beside the cradle, of old women at the spinning wheel or in the subjed of “ Grace before Meat,” his children at their household tasks, and similar themes with one or more figures, approach Rembrandt’s Holy Families and allied Biblical motives very closely, and were certainly produced under the immediate influence of such works. They are indeed almost identical in subjed, but they lack the magic charm with which Rembrandt’s genius was wont to invest his canvases. Nevertheless Maes, too, succeeds in raising his simple subjeds above the level of the commonplace. By his striking effed of incident rays of light gleaming in the midst of deepest shadow, by his powerful colouring, in which a splendid red predominates, and by his luminous and glowing tone, his works produce a peculiarly pleasing, and at times even profoundly impressive, effed, and in this resped show a close connedion with those of his great prototype. The Beit Colledion contains a subjed unusual with this painter, a young peasant girl carrying milk from house to house; she has set her brass pail on the ground, and rings the bell while she turns and smiles archly at the spedator. The brilliant red of her costume (even her straw hat is of the same shade) and the powerful chiaroscuro, contrasted with the white of her sleeves and the tones of the flesh, are most effedive, but the pidure lacks the intimate charm so captivating in earlier works of this artist, though it far surpasses the numerous THE PAINTINGS portraits by him which all belong to his later period. It was long before the fa£t was realized that these conventional and formal portraits, mostly of small dimensions, with their pale light effeds and insipid colouring, could be by the same artist who was Rembrandt’s pupil and under his influence produced those deeply emotional genre-pi