■ ' ' : iiU- ,/• ' , r / - Digitized by the Internet Archive x in 2016 f y** : m v : ' ■ \ r •' . . ; ■ > . VV? i ytn &PM https://archive.org/details/ancientmodernfurOOpoll SOUTH KENSINGTON MUSEUM ART HANDBOOKS. Edited by WILLIAM MASKELL. No. 3 -FURNITURE ANCIENT AND MODERN. These Handbooks are reprints of the dissertations prefixed to the large catalogues of the chief divisions of works of art in the Museum at Soitth Kensington ; arranged and so far abridged as to bring each into a portable shape . The Lords of the Committee of Council on Education having determined on the publication of them , the editor trusts that they will meet the purpose intended ; namely , to be useful , not alone for the collections at South Ken- sington but for other collections, by enabling the public at a trifling cost to understand something of the history and character of the subjects treated of. The authorities referred to in each book are given in the large catalogues ; where will also be found detailed descriptions of the very numerous examples in the South Kensington Micseum. W. M. August, 1875. ANCIENT AND MODERN FURNITURE AND WOODWORK BY JOHN HUNGERFORD POLLEN WITH NUMEROUS WOODCUTS Published foj' the Committee of Council on Education BY CHAPMAN AND HALL, 193, PICCADILLY PRINTED BY VIRTUE AND CO., CITY ROAD. the. G£UT 06 NiHR LIST OF WOODCUTS. PAGE Egyptian chair . . 4 Assyrian chairs . . 7 Greek chair IO Greek chairs ii Greek couches 13 Greek mirror 14 Greek chariot i5 Pompeian interior 19 Roman tripod 22 Roman candelabra 23 Roman candelabra 24 Roman table 26 Roman couch . . 2 7 Roman ceremonial chair . . 28 Roman sella 28 Roman kitchen utensils . . 50 St. Peter’s chair * 35 The chair of king Dagobert 43 Anglo-norman bedstead . . 46 The Coronation chair 49 Interior of English medieval bedroom 51 SKP 2 0 '05 5409 c op/L vi FURNITURE . PAGE Anglo-saxon dinner-table . , . . , , . , , . 52 Dinner-table of middle-class, fifteenth century , , . , . . 53 Table of fifteenth century . . . , . . . . , , 53 Travelling carriage of fifteenth century ; “ Tullia driving over the body of her father” .. .. .. .. .. ..55 Oriental panels .. .. .. .. .. .. •• 57 A royal dinner-table of the fourteenth century . . . , . . 58 French panel ; fifteenth century . . . . . . . . . . 60 Venetian cornice . . . . . , . , , . . . 68 Portion of carved Italian chest . . . . . . . . . . 69 Venetian chair .. .. .. .. .. •• 7 1 Italian bellows . . . . . . . . , , . . . . 7 2 Another example . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Knife-case; 1564 .. .. .. . . .. ..76 Carved panels . . . . . . . , . . . , 80 French table ; sixteenth century . . . . . . . . ..81 French panel; 1577 .. .. .. .. .. ..82 English panel ; about 1590 .. .. .. .. ..86 French cabinet ; sixteenth century . . . . . . . . . . 88 Italian oak pedestal . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Venetian mirror-frame . . . . . . . . . . ..91 German arm-chair ; seventeenth century . . . . . . • • 93 English bracket ; about 1660 . . . . . . . . • • 97 English doorway ; about 1690 .. .. .. .. ..98 Venetian looking-glass .. .. .. .. .. ..100 Holy-water stoup . . . . . . . . . . • • 101 English dinner-table ; 1633 .. .. .. •• •• 102 Italian distaff . . . . . . . . • . • • • • I0 ^ Roman triclinium .. .. .. •• •• • • 1 1 7 Bedstead; fifteenth century .. .. .. .. .. 118 The great bed of Ware . . . . . . • . • • • • 1 *9 FURNITURE. vii PAGE Bedstead at Hampton Court . . . . . . . . . . 120 Mediaeval room . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Cradle ; fifteenth century . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2 1 Foldingchair; fifteenth century .. .. ,, ,, ..122 Italian chair ; sixteenth century .. .. .. .. ..123 Antique Roman tables . . .. .. .. .. ..125 Folding table ; English, 1620 (?) . . . . . . , . . . 126 Mediaeval chest .. .. .. , . .. .. ..127 Roman carriages . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 English carriage ; fourteenth century .. .. ..131 State carriages . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 FURNITURE, ANCIENT AND MODERN. CHAPTER I. The study of a collection of old furniture has an interest beyond the mere appreciation of the beauty it displays. The carving or the ornaments that decorate the various pieces and the skill and ingenuity with which they arq put together are well worthy of our attention. A careful examination of them carries us back to the days in which they were made and to the taste and manners, the habits and the requirements, of bygone ages. The Kensington museum, for example, contains chests, caskets, cabinets, chairs, carriages, and utensils of all sorts and of various countries. Some of these have held the bridal dresses, fans, and trinkets of French and Italian beauties, whose sons and daughters for many generations have long gone to the dust ; there are inlaid folding chairs used at the court of Guido Ubaldo, in the palace of Urbino, and of other Italian princes of the fifteenth century ; buffets and sideboards that figured at mediaeval feasts ; boxes in which were kept the jesses and bells of hawks; love-tokens of many kinds, christening-spoons, draught and chess men, card boxes, belonging to the fifteenth, sixteenth, and seventeenth cen- turies ; carriages of the London of Cromwell and Hogarth, and of the Dublin of Burke ; panelling of the date of Raleigh ; a com- plete room made for a lady of honour to Marie Antoinette. E 2 FURNITURE. Besides these memorials of periods comparatively well known to us, we shall find reproductions of the furniture of ages the habits of which we know imperfectly, such as the chair of Dago- bert, and various relics illustrating the old classic manners and civilisation, as they have come down to us from Roman and Greek artists, and brought to light by the discoveries at Hercu- laneum and Pompeii. The field through which a collection of old furniture stretches is too wide to be filled with anything like completeness ; but the South Kensington collection is already rich in some very rare examples, such as carved chests and cabinets, decorated with the most finished wood carving of Flanders, France, and Italy, as well as of our own country. As wood is the material of which furniture for domestic use has generally been made, there are, of course, limits to its endurance, and not much furniture is to be found anywhere older than the renaissance. Objects for domestic use, such as beds, chairs, chests, tables, &c., are rare, and have not often been collected together. The museum of the hotel de Cluny, in Paris, is the best representative collection of woodwork anterior to the quattro or cinque cento period — i.e. the end of the fifteenth and begin- ning of the sixteenth centuries. Some carved and gilt carriages belonging to the last century are also there ; and a set of car- riages, carved and gilt, made for state ceremonials, used during the latter part of the last century and down to the days of the empire of Napoleon III. are, or were till the war of 1870, kept at the Trianon at Versailles. Many cabinets and tables in Boule work, Vernis-Martin work, and in marquetry by Riesener, Gouthiere, David, and others, in the possession of Sir Richard Wallace, were lately exhibited . in the museum at Bethnal Green, and examples by the same artists from St. Cloud and Meudon are in the Louvre in Paris. A fine collection of carriages, belonging to the royal family of Portugal, is kept in Lisbon. These are decorated in the “Vernis-Martin ” FURNITURE . 3 method. Several old royal state carriages, carved and gilt, the property of the emperor of Austria, are at Vienna. In order to take a general review of the kinds, forms, and changes of personal and secular woodwork and furniture, as manners and fashions have influenced the wants of different nations and times, it will be well to divide the subject in chrono- logical order into antique ; Egyptian, Ninevite, Greek, Roman : — modern; early and late mediaeval: — renaissance; seventeenth and eighteenth century work : to be followed by an inquiry into the changes that some of the pieces of furniture in most frequent use have undergone. B 2 CHAPTER II. ANTIQUE ; EGYPT, NINEVEH, AND GREECE. Considering the perishable nature of the material, we cannot expect to meet with many existing specimens of the woodwork or furniture of ancient Egypt. There are to be found, however, abundant illustrations of these objects in the paintings and sculp- tures of monuments. The most com- plete are on the walls of the tombs, where we see detailed pictures of domestic life, and the interiors of houses are shown, with entertain- ments of parties of ladies and gentle- men talking, listening to music, eating and drinking. The guests are seated on chairs of wood, framed up with sloping backs, of which specimens are in the British museum ; others are on stools or chairs of greater splendour, stuffed and covered on the seat and back with costly textiles, having the wooden framework carved and gilt, generally in the form of the fore and hind legs of tigers, panthers, and other animals of the chace, sometimes supported, as in the accompanying woodcut, on figures representing captives. The British museum contains six Egyptian chairs. One of these is made of ebony, turned in the lathe and inlaid with FURNITURE. 5 collars and dies of ivory. It is low, the legs joined by light rails of cane, the back straight, with two cross-bars and light rails between. The seat is slightly hollowed, and is of plaited cane as in modern chairs. Another is square, also with straight back, but with pieces of wood sloped into the seat to make it comfort- able for a sitter. Small workmen’s stools of blocks of wood hollowed out and with three or four legs fastened into them may also be referred to, and a table on four legs tied by four bars near the lower ends. The Egyptians used couches straight, like ottomans ; with head boards curving over as in our modern sofas, sometimes with the head and tail of an animal carved on the ends, and the legs and feet carved to correspond. These were stuffed and covered with rich material. The Egyptians did not recline at meals. Their double seats, 8/^pot, or bisellia, were such as were used by the Greeks and Romans. They had shelve^ and recesses, chests and coffers, made of pine or cedar woody apd of a material still used in Egypt, the cafass — palm sticks -formed into planks by thin pegs or rods of harder wood passing through a series of these sticks laid together. “ Of their bedroom furniture,” says Sir Gardner Wilkinson, “ we know but little.” They used (he tells us) their day couches probably, or lay on mats, and on low wooden pallets made of palm sticks. These last had curved blocks, which served for a pillow, forming a hollow to receive the head. Examples in alabaster and wood are in the Louvre and in the British museum. Their materials for dress were of the most delicate and costly description. The robes of the ladies were often transparent, and the gold and silver tissues, muslins, and gossamer fabrics made in India and Asia were probably also used in Egypt. All these, as well as their jewels and valuables, imply corresponding chests and smaller coffers. Small toilet boxes elegantly carved into the form or with representations of leaves and animals, are preserved in the Louvre and in the British museum and other collections. 6 FURNITURE . They were generally of sycamore wood, sometimes of tamarisk or sont (acacia), and occasionally the more costly ivory or inlaid work was substituted for wood. Larger boxes may also be seen in the Louvre, some large enough to contain dresses. They are square, with flat, curved, or gable tops, painted on the surface, and generally lifted from the ground by four short legs or prolon- gations of the rails that form the framework. These boxes are dovetailed, and secured by glue and nails. Their chariots and the harness of their horses were rich in proportion, the former painted, inlaid with ivory and gold, or with surface gilding, containing cases for their bows and arms, and made of wood filled in with the lightest materials, perhaps canvas stiffened with preparations of lac in the Japanese manner, and put together with a skill that made the carriage-makers of Egypt famous in their day. It will be sufficient to add that the great Jewish kings had their chariots' supplied from Egypt. Solomon paid about ^75 of our money for a chariot, and of these he kept (for war purposes alone) a force of fourteen hundred, with forty thousand horses. Mummy cases of cedar, a material readily procured and valued for its preservative qualities, are to be seen in many collections, and examples can be examined in the British museum. They are richly decorated with hieroglyphic paintings executed in tempera, and varnished with gum mastic. The furniture of Nineveh is not so elaborately or completely represented as that of Egypt, where the preservation of sculpture and painting was helped out by a climate of extraordinary dry- ness. But the discoveries of Mr. Layard have thrown on the details of Ninevite domestic life light enough to give us the means of forming a judgment on their furniture. “ Ornaments,” says Mr. Layard, “ in the form of the heads of animals, chiefly the lion, bull, and ram, were very generally intro- duced, even in parts of the chariot, the harness of the horses, and domestic furniture.” In this respect the Assyrians resembled the FURNITURE. 7 Egyptians. “ Their tables, thrones, and couches were made both of metal and wood, and probably inlaid with ivory. We learn from Herodotus that those in the temple of Belus in Babylon were of solid gold.” According to Mr. Layard, the chair represented in the earliest monuments is without a back, and the legs tastefully carved. This form occurs in the palace of Nimrud, and is sculptured on one of the bas- reliefs now in the British mu- seum. Often the legs ended in the feet of a lion or the hoofs of a bull, and were made of gold, silver, or bronze. “ On the monuments of Khorsabad and by the rock tablets of Mal- thaiyah we find representations of chairs supported by animals and by human figures, sometimes prisoners, like the Caryatides of the Greeks. In this they resemble the arm-chairs of Egypt, but appear to have been more massive. This mode of ornamenting the throne of the king was adopted by the Per- sians, and is seen in the sculpture of Persepolis.” The woodcut repre- sents such a chair, from a bas-relief at Khorsabad. The lion head and lion foot were used by other oriental nations. The throne of king Solo- mon was supported by lions for arms, probably in the same position as the horses in the Khorsa- bad chair ; and lions of gold or chryselephantine work stood , six on each side on the six steps before the throne. 3 FURNITURE. The forms of furniture of a later date in the sculptures of Nineveh at Khorsabad are of an inferior style. “ The chairs have generally more than one cross-bar, and are somewhat heavy and ill-proportioned, the feet resting upon large inverted cones, re- sembling pine-apples.” All these seats, like the St'0poi and sella of important personages in Greece and Rome, were high enough to require a footstool. “ On the earlier monuments of Assyria footstools are very beautifully carved or modelled. The feet were ornamented, like those of the chair, With the feet of lions or the hoofs of bulls.” The tables seem in general to have been of similar form and decoration to the thrones or seats, the ends of the frame project- ing and carved as in the woodcut above, only on a larger scale. The couches were of similar form, but made of gold and silver, stuffed and covered on the surface with the richest materials. The tables and the chairs were often made in the shape also found in Greece and Rome, with folding supports that open on a central rivet like our camp-stools, and like the curule chairs which were common not only in Rome but throughout Italy during the renaissance. A large piece of wood of pine or cedar is in the British museum. It is of a full red colour, the effect of time. Cedar was probably most in use ; but both in Egypt and Nineveh, as also in Judaea under Solomon and his successors, woods were imported from Europe and India ; ebony certainly, perhaps rose- wood, teak, and Indian walnut. Ebony and ivory were con- tinually used for inlaying furniture. Of their bedroom furniture we can say little, nor do we know of what kind were the cabinets or chests made to preserve their dresses and valuables. It is probable, however, that these were occasionally as rich and elaborate as any of their show or state furniture. Of Hebrew furniture we can give few details. It is probable that the Jews differed but little from the Assyrians in this respect. The throne of Solomon has been already noticed. In the story FURNITURE. of Judith the canopy and curtains of the bed of Holofernes may have been taken by the chronicler from familiar examples at home, or may have been strictly drawn from traditional details. In the figurative language of the Canticles, the bed of Solomon is of cedar of Lebanon, the pillars of silver, the bottom of gold. Ordinary bedroom furniture is spoken of in the Chronicles, when the Shunamite woman, a person of great wealth, built for the prophet Elias “ a little chamber on the wall, and set therein a bed, a table, a stool, and a candlestick.” Ivory wardrobes are mentioned in the 45th psalm, but of what size or form we cannot determine. In the book of Esther allusions are made to Persian furniture decorations, white, green, and blue hangings fastened with fine linen to silver rings and pillars of marble. The beds were of gold and silver, &c. The bed of Og, king of Bashan, was nine cubits long by fouq and was of iron : it was preserved as a trophy. As the chariots of artists employed on th reasonable to suppose workmen, or that the Hebrews borrowed freely the forms and decorations of surrounding Asiatic nations. Though specially and purposely jealous of any innovation or interference with religious rites and observances, we have no cause to think that they objected to the use of furniture or utensils such as they found first during the long sojourn in Egypt, and afterwards in other countries. They are said in earlier times to have spoiled the Egyptians with reference to the ornaments and jewels carried away at the migration. We know that Moses was “ learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians;” and two particular artists, and two only, are named in the book of Exodus as qualified to execute the sacred vessels and utensils. Whatever their technical qualifications were, these had been acquired in Egypt. In any attempt to picture to ourselves the kind of furniture and objects of daily use apart from chariots, arms, &c., that sur- SoJornon were^nade in Egypt, and the 2 triVilpit ea^aeyfrom Tyre, it is not un- thS^ufniture*'Was either made by foreign 10 FURNITURE. rounded the Greeks in early ages, it will be necessary to bear in mind the close connection which that people must have had with the Asiatic races, and the splendour and refinement that surrounded the wealthy civilisation of the oriental monarchies. They were so continually the allies or the rivals of the various states in Asia Minor, and pushed out into that fertile region so many vigorous colonies, that it cannot be doubted that the splendid stuffs, beds, couches, thrones, chariots, &c., used by Greeks on the Asiatic continent or in Europe, had much ot eastern character in form and method of execution ; perhaps, at first, in decoration also. This wood- cut represents a chair of Assyrian character on a bas-relief from Xan- thus, in the British museum. Much that is oriental figures in poetic accounts of the arms, furni- ture, and equipments of the Greek heroic ages. The chiefs take the field in chariots. These could have been used but in small numbers on ground so uneven as the rocky territories of the Morea. The beds described by Homer, the coverlids of dyed wool, tapestries, or carpets, and other instances of coloured and showy furniture, were genuine descriptions of objects known and seen, though not common. Generally the furniture of the heroic age was simple. Two beds of bronze of Tartessus, one Dorian and one Ionian, the smallest weighing fifty talents, of uncertain date, were kept in the treasury at Altis, and seen there by Pausanias towards the end of the second century. The chariots differed little except in the orna- mental carving, modelling, or chasing, from those of Egypt. The oldest remaining models of Greek furniture to which we can point are the chairs in which the antique figures in the Syrian FURNITURE. 1 1 room at the British museum are seated. These are dated six, or nearly six, centuries before Christ. They represent chairs with backs, quite perpendicular in front and behind. The frame- pieces of the seats are morticed into the legs, and the mortices and tenons are accurately marked in the marble, the horizontal passing right through the upright bars. These early pieces of furniture were probably executed in wood, not metal, which was at first but rarely used. The woodcuts show the different forms taken from antique bas-reliefs. The chest or coffer in which Cypselus of Corinth had been concealed was seen by Pausanias in the temple of Olympia. It was made about the middle of the sixth century b.c. The chest was of cedar, carved and decorated with figures and bas- reliefs, some in ivory, some in gold or ivory partly gilt, which were inlaid on the four sides and on the top. The subjects of the sculpture were old Greek myths and local legends, and tradi- FURNITURE . I 2 tions connected with the country. This coffer is supposed to have been executed by Eumelos of Corinth. The great period of Greek art began in the fifth century b.c. ; but those were not days favourable to the development of per- sonal luxury among the citizens. An extreme simplicity in private manners balanced the continual publicity and political excitement of Greek life. The rich classes, moreover, had little inducement to make any display of their possessions. The state enjoyed an indefinite right to the property of its members ; the lawgiver in Plato declared “ ye are not your own, still less is your property your own.” In Sparta the exclusive training for war admitted of no manner of earning money by business. In Athens the poorer class had so exclusively the upper hand of the rich that the latter had to provide the public with entertain- ments of sacrificial solemnities, largesses of corn, and banquets. “ The demos,” says the author of the “ Gentile and the Jew,” “ understood the squeezing of the rich like sponges.” Greece was the paradise of the poor. It is therefore to be expected that the sculpture of the day, though employed sometimes upon the decoration of thrones or state seats, chariots, chests, looking-glasses, tripods, as the painting was on walls, vases, and movable pictures on panels, should have been employed mostly in temples and, with occa- sional exceptions, on objects of some public use. The chest described above was kept as a relic, and the elaborately carved thrones in the temples were those of the statues of gods and heroes. Ivory and gold laid over a substructure of olive wood were the materials quite as frequently used by great sculptors as marble or bronze for statues which did not form parts of the actual decorations of their architecture. In later times these materials were used in sumptuous furniture. The Greeks used couches for sleeping and resting upon, but not for reclining on at meals, till the Macedonian period. We give two or three examples, from marbles : one of which re- FURNITURE . 13 sembles the modern sofa. Women sat always, as in Rome, sometimes on the couch at the head or foot, on which the master of the house or a guest reclined, generally on chairs. Besides chairs like the one represented here, the Greeks made arm-chairs ; and folding chairs of metal. In the Parthenon frieze Jupiter is seated in a square seat on thick turned legs, with a round bar for a back, resting on short turned posts fitted into the seat. The arms are less high than the back ; they are formed by slight bars framed into the uprights at the back, and resting on winged sphinxes. Mirrors of mixed metal alloys, silver, tin, and copper, have come down to our times in great num- bers. They were made occasionally in pure silver, and in gold pro- bably among the Greeks as they were in later times among the Romans. The cases are of bronze, and engraved with figure designs of the highest character. There is, however, no proof that these were used as furniture in houses, as in Rome. They are hand mirrors, and the description of them, as works of art, belongs rather to FURNITURE. that of antique bronzes. The woodcut shows the usual type, with the richly ornamented handle. Designs of the Greek couch, whether for sleeping or for reclining at meals, are abundant on tomb paintings, and sculp- tures, and on the paintings of vases. In the British museum we may see a large vase in the second vase room, on which a couch for two persons is ar- ranged with a long mattress covered with rich material, lying within what appears to be a border of short turned rails with a cushion on each end, also covered with rich striped material. A long low stool decorated with ivory lies below the couch as a kind of step. The legs, as in many vase representations, are thick turned supports with lighter parts below, and a turned knob at the foot. On another vase Dionysus reclines on a thick round cushion at the head of the couch, while Ariadne sits on it. Figures feasting or stretched in death on similar couches can be seen in two beautiful and perfect funeral chests in the ^Egina room. All these pieces of furniture seem made of or decorated with ivory, and furnished with coloured cushions or coverings of an oriental character. Tripods were made of bronze in great number for sacred use, and probably also as the supports of brasiers, tables, &c., in private houses. The tables were of wood, marble, and metal ; the supports being either lion or leopard legs and heads, or sphinxes with lifted wings, a favourite form in Greek ornamentation. With regard to Greek houses generally, their arrangements differed very little from the earlier houses of the Romans. The bas-relief in the British museum — Bacchus received as a guest by Icarus — represents a couch with turned legs, the feet of which are decorated with leaf work ; a plain square stool, perhaps the top FURNITURE . i3 of a box, on which masks are laid, and a tripod table with lion legs. The houses in the background are tiled. The windows are divided into two lights by an upright mullion or column, and a bas-relief of a charioteer driving two horses ornaments a portion of the wall, and may be intended for a picture hung up or fixed against the wall. The whole shows us an Athenian house, decked for a festive occasion, and garlands and hangings are festooned round its outer walls. The Greek chariot was of wood, probably similar to that of the Egyptians. It had sometimes wheels with four strong spokes only, as in the woodcut. The chariot wheel of the car of Mausolus, in the British museum, has six. The Ninevite wheels have sometimes as many as twelve, as may be seen in the sculptured bas-reliefs of the narrow Assyrian gallery of the British museum. The woods used by the Greeks for sculpture were ebony, cypress, cedar, oak, smilax, yew, willow, lotus , and citron. These materials were rarely left without enrichments of ivory, gold, and colour. The faces of statues were painted vermilion, the dresses, crowns, or other ornaments were gilt or made in wrought gold. CHAPTER III. THE ROMANS. The splendour that surrounded the personal usages of the earlier races of antiquity, the Egyptians, Ninevites, Persians, Greeks, and Tuscans, was inherited by the Romans. Not only did they outlive those powers, but they absorbed their territory as far as they could reach it ; they affected to take in their religions and deities to add to their own system ; they drained the subject populations for slaves, and eagerly adopted from them every art that could administer to the magnificence and luxury of their own private life. They have left both written records in their literature and actual examples of their furniture, made in metal or of marble. The discovery of Herculaneum and of Pompeii has given us not only single pieces of furniture, but very considerable remains of houses, shops, streets, fora or open public places of assembly, theatres, and baths. It is in such evidences of Roman social life that we shall find the materials for our present inquiry. The Romans spent their earlier ages in unceasing struggles for independence and dominion : and so long as the elder powers of Italy survived to dispute the growth of Roman greatness, there could not be much expansion of private wealth or splendour in the houses of Roman citizens. Though surrounded by splendid social life among the Etruscans, the Roman people long remained exceptionally simple in personal habits. It was after the Punic wars that oriental luxuries found their way into Italy along with FURNITURE . *7 the Carthaginian armies. Tapestry is said to have been first brought to Rome by Attalus, the king of Pergamus, who died 13 . c. 133 possessed of immense wealth, and bequeathed tapestries, generally used in the east from the early ages, to the Roman citizens. When Augustus became emperor the conquest of the world was complete. Thenceforward military habits and simpli- city of individual life were no longer necessary to a state that could find no political rivals. The great capital of the world absorbed like a vast vegetable growth the thought, the skill, and the luxuries of the whole world. Nothing was too valuable to be procured by the great Roman nobles or money-makers, and nothing too strange not to find a place and be welcome in one or other of their vast households. While this was so at Rome in chief, it must be remembered that other capitals were flourishing in various countries, as wealthy, as luxurious in .their qwn way and degree, only less in extent and means, and lacking that peculiar seal of supremacy that gives to the real capital a character that is never attained in subordinate centres of civilisation. Antioch was such a centre in the east ; Alexandria in the south. Both these great cities contained wealthy, refined, and luxurious societies. Both were known as universities and seats of learning. Antioch was the most debauched and luxurious ; Alexandria the most learned and refined. They did not exactly answer to the distinct capitals of modern kingdoms and states, such as we now see flourishing in Europe, to London, Paris, Vienna, Berlin, or St. Petersburg, because no one supreme state or city predominates over them ; and further still, no one draws the pick and choice of the intellect and refinement of the whole of Europe to absorb them into itself as Rome did in the old world. But, in those days, Antioch and Alexandria, one at the head of the wealth and splendour of Asia, the other represent- ing Greek learning grafted on the ancient scientific and artistic traditions of Egypt, must have contributed much to the general c i8 FURNITURE. fusion of “ ideas ” and notions on art and personal manners and customs in the capital of the Roman empire. The Roman house was of traditional plan, and consisted gene- rally of two or more square enclosures surrounded by arcades, open to the air in the centre, but which openings could be closed in summer or winter by awnings when the courts were not large enough to include a garden, as the inner enclosure usually did. The house had in front a vestibulum , an open space covered by a verandah-shaped roof, sometimes enclosed by lattices, some- times open. An ostium or lobby inside the entrance-door, deep enough to contain a small porter’s lodge on one side, led to an inner door which opened on the atrium. This court had an opening to the air, and a tank for rain water was sunk in the middle. Fountains with jets or falls of water were not uncommon, the ancients being well acquainted with the principle that water if brought from an elevation in pipes will force its way up to its natural level. Inside the atriui?i was the 7iuptiale , the nuptial bed, and here were kept in earliest times the penates, household or family divi- nities, and the family hearth, though these sacred emblems were banished in the imperial times to distant parts of the house, and statues between the columns that supported the central roof sup- plied their place. The atrium was the general reception-room, like the hall in mediaeval houses, but not the dining-room. To this succeeded an inner open court, with porticoes or corridors running round, supported on columns, and with a fountain or basin, shrubs and flowers in the centre, like the courts of the Alhambra. This court provided four halls in the four corridors, which could be screened off by tapestries and curtains. The centre was shaded in summer by canvas or carpet awnings. In winter a wooden roof could be pushed over the open space. Between the two halls or courts was a chamber called the triclinium , or dining-room. These rooms were roofed with timber richly painted and gilt. The roofs either hung on beams pro- FURNITURE. *9 jecting from the walls, or were supported by pillars, or were carried up to a high opening, sloping back to the walls so as to admit more light to the rooms, alcoves, or screened portions furthest removed from the opening. Occasionally they were covered in wholly with a testudo-shaped roof, and in such cases lighted, perhaps, by dormers, though it is not quite clear how light was provided for in such constructions. Roman rooms were not floored with boards but paved with marble in large pieces, or in mosaic work made of small dies or squares. Coarse specimens of such work manufactured in our own times are laid down in the museum at Kensington, and fragments of the old work may be seen there on the walls. Occasionally these mosaics represent the house watch-dog chained, or the fable of Ganymede, or hunting scenes, sometimes finished with the utmost nicety. The triclinium took its name from the three couches or sofas, on each of which three persons reclined during meals. Later, and in sumptuous palaces, several dining-rooms were built out beyond the inner courts. The engraving, a reconstruction, will give a fair idea of the general character of a richly furnished Roman C 2 20 FURNITURE . house. First, is the atrium , into which smaller chambers open ; next, the triclinium , to the left of which is a cabinet; and beyond is the peristylium , with its lofty colonnades. This last apartment was large and open ; often planted with shrubs and trees, or con- taining statues, flowers in pots and vases, and surrounded by a corridor. As these courts were of various sizes they were, no doubt, in Rome on a scale out of all proportion to those found at Pompeii ; were fewer or more in number, and rooms were added as the proprietor could acquire ground for building, often a difficulty in the older parts of the city. Something of this ground plan survives in a few of the very ancient Roman churches, as in that of S. Pudenziana, formerly the house of the senator Pudens, with vestibules, open courts, &c. Around the inner court, in the sumptuous Roman houses and the country villas of the patricians, were built other rooms, dining- halls, no longer called triclinium but triclinia in the plural, as admitting more than the number of nine persons reclining on the conventional three couches, to dine at once. In the city itself room was probably wanting in private houses for such expansion, the houses being in streets already laid out. In the villas there was no such restriction. These halls were built to face different quarters of the compass and to be used according to the season. Verna and autumnalis looked to the east, hyberna to the west, cestiva to the north. CEci were other rooms still larger ; and glass windows were to be found in them. In a painting now in the Kensington museum, n°- 653, given by the emperor Napoleon the third, glazed windows can be distinguished, divided by upright mullions and transoms of wood, such as were constructed in English houses in the seventeenth century. The sleeping- rooms, cubicula , were small closets rather than rooms, closed in general by curtains or hangings, and disposed about the sides of the rooms between the courts, or round the outer courts themselves. Besides the living and sleeping chambers, there were store- FURNITURE. 2 I rooms for various kinds of food. Wearing apparel was kept in ves liana, wardrobe rooms, fitted especially to store them in. It is doubtful whether the dresses were in chests : more probably in presses, or hanging on pegs. The ornamental woodwork in some of these rooms was rich in the extreme. The outer vestibule was protected by an over- hanging balcony or by the projecting rafters of the roof of the first portion of the house, according as rooms were built over that portion or not. It was in some instances enclosed by carved or trellised woodwork. The doors were generally in two valves and could be closed with locks, which in the age of the empire were thoroughly understood, with latchets secured by a pin or with a wooden bar. The term obserare was used when the secu- rity of a bar was added. The hinge was a pin or peg at the top and bottom which turned in a socket. Metal hinges strapped over the wood frame were not unknown : and bronze hinges are in the collection of the British museum. The decoration of the door, which was of wood, consisted principally of bronze mounts. The doorposts were ornamented with carving, sometimes inlaid with tortoiseshell and other rich materials. The woodwork was painted. Bedrooms were closed with doors ; oftener by curtains. The windows were generally closed with shutters, hinged and in pairs. They were some six feet six inches above the level of the street, not beyond reach of the knocks and signals of friends out- side. Wooden benches were usually provided in the vestibule. Besides the inlaid door frames, the ceilings of all the Roman rooms were very richly decorated. In more simple construc- tions the wood joists of the floor above, or the structure of the roof when no room surmounted it, were shown and painted ; but in richer houses the timbers were covered with boards, and formed into coffers and panels, painted, gilt, and inlaid with ivory. This splendid system of decoration dates from the destruction of Carthage. Curved bearers from the upper part of the walls were added to form one kind of ceiling ( camara ), for which Vitruviu^ 22 FURNITURE. gives directions ; and glass mosaics, like those used in the pave- ments, were inlaid on a plaster bed in the coffers. The cornices were of carved wood, or of plaster carved or modelled ; the wood was always covered with a preparation of gesso, and gilt and painted like the walls. An examination of the remains of Roman glass found at Pompeii and elsewhere, and of which excellent examples may be studied in the Kensington museum, seems to point to the use not only of mosaics made of dies, but of mouldings, borders, and panels moulded in coloured glass of magnificent hues, and with the finest stamped ornaments. These were occasionally gilt, or were made in relief, or with a coat of opaque white glass over the translucent material, which could be cut and modelled in the manner of cameos, and helped further to decorate the ceiling, always one of the most splendid features of the room. The walls, when not painted, were sometimes hung with mirrors of glass blackened, or of silver, or of slabs of obsidian. They were of various sizes, sometimes large enough to reflect of sculpture. These were generally of bronze, and original pieces obtained in various parts of Italy can be seen in the bronze room persons at full length. In the case of portable pictures, frames were added round them. Borders were certainly painted round frescoes. It is not to be supposed that paintings which could be exposed for sale, moved about, and hung up, could be finished round otherwise than by ornamental mouldings, or framework sufficient to protect and properly set them off. Among the ornamental pieces of furniture were tripods, three-legged frames, forming the supports of tables, of altars, of braziers, sometimes of pieces FURNITURE. 2 3 of the British museum. Some of these much exceed the height of high modern tables. They are light, and ornamented on the upper ends with animal or other heads ; some with the begin- ning of a hind leg about halfway down. They were, however, frequently movable, and, like the piece in the cut on the preced- ing page from an example in the British museum, were made to contract by folding ; the stays which connect the legs internally slipping up and down them by means of loops. Such pieces might serve as table legs, or would hold altar pans or common hre pans or support pots of flowers. Besides tripods the reception rooms were ornamented with candelabra on tall stands of most graceful form and proportions. It will suffice to point to more than a dozen of examples in the British museum ; and the woodcuts are from examples in other collections. The stems are a fluted staff or a light tree stem, commonly supported on three animal legs spread at the base, and branching out on the tops into one, two, or more boughs or hooks, with elegant modelled decorations or ending in flat stands. 2 4 FURNITURE . One has a slight rim round the dish or stand, on which a cande- labrum or wax candlestick could be placed. In other cases the lamps were hung by their suspensory chains to the branches described. Other candelabra stands were of marble, six, eight, ten, or more feet in height, hybrid compositions of column caps, acanthus leaves and stems, on altar bases, &c., in great variety of design, of which engravings may be studied in the work of FURNITURE. 25 Piranesi. Casts, n os - 93, 94 (antiques), are in the South Kensing- ton museum. ' We do not know in what kind of repositories or pieces of furni- ture the ancient Romans kept their specimens of painting or their vases, some of which formed their most valued treasures. It is generally supposed that they were set on shelves fastened to the wall. On such shelves small images, boxes of alabaster or glass, and ornamental vases of all kinds were kept. Craters, sculptured vases on a large scale and made of bronze or marble, were also mounted on pedestals and ranged as ornaments with the statues. Bronzes and statues, pieces of sculpture that had fixed places, stood either along the walls of the reception rooms or under the eaves of the compluvium , whence light was obtained to set them off to advantage, and where turf, flowers, and fountains were in front of them. A vase oi^eraferp^rly eight feet high, is in the hall of the British muse^m^br^agM from the villa of Hadrian at Palestrina; and in the l^france-hali of Nero’s house there was a colossus 120 feet high, anthlong^ arcades and a tank or basin of water. But objects on this scale scarcely belong to the descriptions of what might be found ordinarily in houses of the great patricians. Sometimes a couch and a table of marble were placed close to the fountains in these delightful portions of the house. Tables were of many varieties in Rome, and enormous ex- penses were incurred in the purchase of choice pieces of such furniture. They were made of marble, gold, silver, bronze ; were engraved, damascened, plated, and otherwise enriched with the precious metals ; were of ivory, and of wood, and wood deco- rated with ivory ; and in many other methods. Engraved (p. 26) is a very beautiful table found at Pompeii, and now at Naples. Tripods, terminal and other figures, made of bronze or marble ; winged sphinxes, or leopards’ and lions’ legs, columns and other architectonic forms, were the supports on which these tables were fastened. Some had one central support only, in 26 FURNITURE. a few instances finished with animal heads of ivory. Abaci were small tables with raised rims to hold valuables. Many tables were of cedar and on ivory feet. Horace speaks of maple, so also does Pliny, as a favourite wood for tables : birds’ - eye maple especially was much prized. The planks and disks that could be cut from the roots and the boles of trees that had been either pollarded or otherwise dwarfed in growth in order to obtain wavy grain, knotted convolutions, &c., were in request. Veneers of well- mottled wood or of precious wood, small in scantling, were glued on pine, cedar, &c., as a base. These pol- lard heads, root pieces, &c., were bought at high prices, specially those of the citrus or cedrus Atla?itica. The point held to be de- sirable (says Pliny) in the grain of tables was to have “ veins arranged in waving lines or else forming spirals like so many little whirlpools. In the former arrangement the lines run in an oblong direction, for which reason they are called tigrince , tiger tables. In the latter case they are called fiantherince , or panther tables. There are some with wavy, undulating marks, and which are more particularly esteemed if these resemble the eyes of a peacock.” Next in esteem to these was the veined wood covered or dotted, as it were, with dense masses of grain, for which reason such tables received the name of apiatce , parsley wood. But the FURNITURE. 27 colour of the wood is the quality that was held in the highest esteem of all ; that of wine mixed with honey was the most prized, the veins being peculiarly refulgent. The detect in that kind of table was lignum (dull log colour), a name given to the wood when common-looking, indistinct, with stains or flaws. The barbarous tribes, according to Pliny, buried the citrus wood in the ground while green, giving it first a coating of wax. When it came into the workman’s hands it was put for a certain number of days beneath a heap of corn. By this process the wood lost weight. Sea-water was supposed to harden it, and to act as a preservative. This wood was carefully polished by hand-iubbing. As much as £ 9,000 (a million of sesterces) was paid for one table by Cicero. Of two that had belonged to king Juba, sold by auction, one fetched over ;£ 10,000. These were made of citrus ( Thuya articulata or cedrus Atlantica). We hear of two made for king Ptolemaeus of Mauritania, the property of Nomius, a freed man of Tiberius, formed out of two slices or sections of the cedrus Atlantica four feet stnd a half in diameter, the largest known to Pliny ; and of the destruction of a table, the property ot the family of the Cethegi, valued at 1,400,000 sesterces. The Roman patricians and their ladies sat on chairs and re- clined on couches when not at meals. In the atrium under the broad roofed corridors, and in the halls not used for eating, were couches, such as the couch of which we give a woodcut, of bronze 01 of precious woods ; the bronze damascened with ornaments ot 28 FURNITURE . the precious metals, or of metal amalgam ; the wood veneered or inlaid with marquetry or tarsia work of ivory, ebony, box, palm, birds’-eye maple, beech, and other woods. The chairs were of different kinds and were used for various occasions. The atrium contained double seats, single seats, and benches to hold more than one sitter ; chairs that either folded or were made in the form of folding chairs, such as could be carried about and placed in the chariot, curules. The woodcut shows the general fashion of a state or ceremonial chair; from the marble example in the Louvre. This woodcut is of the sella, a seat or couch, made of wood, with turned legs ; it is intended, probably, for one person only, and has no need of a footstool. It has been covered with a cushion. Scamnum was a bench or long seat of wood, used in poorer houses instead of the luxurious triclinium of the men or arm-chairs of the women, for sitting at meals or other occa- sions. Seats were placed along the walls in the exedrce or saloons ; marble benches in most cases, sometimes wooden seats ; particularly also in the alcoves that were constructed in the porticoes of baths and public buildings, where lectures of philo- sophers were listened to. The Romans had hearths in certain rooms. Numerous pas- sages in ancient writers, to which it is needless to refer, concur in showing that the hearth was a spot sacred to the lares of the family, the altar of family life. It was occasionally made of FURNITURE. 29 bricks or stone, and immovable, on which logs could be heaped. It seems doubtful whether chimneys were used in the Roman houses ; probably occasionally. Writers on Roman antiquities speak of such rare constructions used, perhaps, as ventilators to the kitchen. The usual method of warming was by means of a brazier, of which an example found at Csere, in Etruria, is pre- served in the British museum. It is a round dish on three animal legs, with swing handles for removing it. Another, square in form, is reproduced in a casting in the South Kensington museum collection, n°* 70, standing on animal legs and dama- scened round the sides with gold ornaments. The Romans had also kitchen braziers with contrivances for heating pans, water, wine, &c., by charcoal. N°- 71 at South Kensington is a casting of such a piece, having a round metal receptacle, like a small cask, on its end, and a raised horse-shoe frame, on which a pan could be placed, with fire space in the middle. These braziers were filled with charcoal heated thoroughly by the help of the bellows, to get rid of the noxious gases. It has been said that the dresses of the Romans were preserved, as in mediaeval castles, in a separate room or wardrobe, and this room must have been fitted with apparatus for hanging shelves and lockers. They had besides for keeping valuables, and usually placed in the sleeping-room of the master or mistress of the house, cupboards and chests of beech ornamented with metal, some large enough to contain a man. In these receptacles they conveyed their property to and from country houses, and on visits. Enormous numbers of slaves moved to and fro with the family, and the chests were carried on men’s shoulders, or in waggons of various shape and make. The most important action of the luxurious Roman day was the dinner. Couches were arranged for the guests, and the room was further provided with stools or low benches, side tables, and the movable table used for each course. These tables were put down and removed from the supports on which they stood. The 30 FURNITURE . side tables were of marble or of wood, covered with silver plates inlaid, veneered, and ornamented in various ways ; some were used for serving the dishes, others for the display of plate. Sculptured objects of plate, partly ornamental, were put on the table and removed with the courses. Petronius describes an ass of Corinthian bronze with silver paniers as the centre piece of one course; sauces dropped from the paniers on luscious morsels placed beneath. A hen of wood with eggs within and a figure of Vertumnus are also named by the same author as centre pieces. These were replaced on the sideboard or removed with the course in trays. Closely connected with the dining-room was, it need scarcely be said, the kitchen ; and we give woodcuts of kitchen utensils, from the originals preserved at Naples. Mention should be made of tapestries and carpets before leav- ing the subject of Roman house furniture. FURNITURE. 3i Carpets, tapete, blankets, or other woollen coverlids for sofas or beds, were made at Corinth, Miletus, and a number of seats of fine wool manufacture. It is too large a question to go into in detail, and woven fabrics belong to a different class of objects fully described in another hand-book, upon textiles. These tapestries played a great part in the actual divisions of the Roman rooms. Bedrooms, it has been said, were often closed with curtains only, and the corridors and smaller rooms were closed at the ends and made comfortable by the same means. At the dinner detailed by Petronius the hangings on the triclinia are changed between pauses in the meal. The feelings consonant with the day or occasion were symbolized or carried out in these external decorations. Mention is made by Seneca of ceilings made so as to be moved, and portions turned by machinery ; perhaps the changed panels showed different colours and decorations accord- ing to the day, and to theffiangings which were used. The same author alludes to wood jG^ilings tljaf could be raised higher or lower by machinery, “ pegmata per sel surgentia et tabulata tacite in sublime cresce?itiaP making no noise in the operation. These con- trivances were reserved for dining-rooms, where the diversions were of the freest description and the guests prepared for any exciting or sensational interludes. The Romans required some of their furniture for out-door use. Besides the curule chairs and lofty seats which were carried into theatres or baths, and other places of public resort, they used litters. The sofas or couches were sometimes carried on the necks of six or more slaves, and served as litters. But special contrivances like the Indian palanquins were made with or hung under poles, with curtains or shutters. Stations of such convey- ances for public use were established in Rome. The subjects of the carving and ornamentation of Roman furni- ture were the classic legends mainly derived from the Greek mythology. Roman house walls were, however, in later years profusely decorated with conventional representations of archi- 32 FURNITURE. tecture, and panels richly coloured on which were painted figures of dancers, cupids, gods and heroes; sometimes commonplace landscapes and domestic scenes. Their solid furniture was deco- rated with masks, heads of heroes, legs and feet of animals, and foliage, generally the leaves of the acanthus, of an architectonic kind. The great achievement of the Romans in woodwork of a con- structive kind was the machinery contrived for public shows, such as the cages shot up out of the sand of the arena of amphi- theatres, of which the sides fell down, leaving at liberty the beasts wanted for fights or for the execution of criminals. Of such constructions probably nothing in the middle ages, when timber abounded and the use of it was thoroughly understood, exceeds the following ; a description by Pliny of a device of C. Curio, in Africa, when celebrating the funeral games in honour of his father : — “ He caused to be erected close together two theatres of very large dimensions and built of wood, each of them nicely poised, and turning on a pivot. Before mid-day a spectacle of games was exhibited in each, the theatres being turned back to back, in order that the noise of neither of them might interfere with what was going on in the other. Then, in the latter part of the day, all on a sudden, the two theatres were swung round and, the corners uniting, brought face to face; the outer frames too were removed (i.e. the backs of each hemicycle) and thus an amphitheatre was formed, in which combats of gladiators were presented to the view ; men whose safety was almost less compromised than that of the Roman people in allowing itself to be thus whirled round from side to side.” The following woods were in use amongst the Romans : — For carpentry and joiner’s work, cedar was the wood most in demand. Pine of different kinds was used for doors, panels, carriage building, and all work requiring to be joined up with glue, of which that wood is particularly retentive. Elm was FURNITURE . 33 employed for the framework of doors, lintels and sills, in which sockets were formed for the pins or hinges on which the doors turned. The hinge jambs were occasionally made of olive. Ash was employed for many purposes ; that grown in Gaul was used in the construction of carriages on account of its extreme supple- ness and pliancy. Axles and portions which we,re much morticed together were made of Ilex ( Holm oak). Beech also was in fre- quent use. Acer {Maple) was much prized, as has been already stated, for tables, on account of the beauty of the wood and of the finish which it admits. Osiers were in use for chairs as in our own times. Veneering was universal in wood furniture of a costly kind. The slices of wood were laid down with glue as in modern work, and they used tarsia or picture work of all kinds. Figwood, willow , plane , elm, ash , mulberry , cherry , cork wood , were amongst the materials for the bed or substance on which to lay such work. Wild and cultivated olive , box , ebony (Corsican espe- cially), ilex , beech , were adapted for veneering boxes, desks, and small work. Besides these, the Romans used the Syrian terebinth , maple , palm (cut across), holly , root of elder , poplar ; horn, ivory plain and stained ; tortoiseshell ; and wood grained in imitation of various woods for veneering couches and other large pieces of furniture, as well as door frames, &c., so that this imitation of grains is not entirely a modern invention. Woods were soaked in water or buried under heaps of grain to season them ; or steeped in oil of cedar to keep off the worms. The cedars of Crete, Africa, and Syria were the best of that class of timber. The best fir timber was obtained from the Jura range, from Corsica, Bithynia, Pontus, and Macedonia. The Romans had admirable glue, and used planes, chisels, &c. Their saws, set in frames, had the teeth turned in opposite direc- tions to open the seam in working. There are some curious historical records of the endurance of particular wood structures. The cedar roof of the temple of Diana of Ephesus was intact at the end of four centuries in D 34 FURNITURE . Pliny’s time. Her statue was black, supposed to be of ebony, but according to other authorities of vine, and had outlasted various rebuildings of the temple. The roof beams of the temple of Apollo at Utica were of cedar and had been laid 348 years before the foundation of Rome ; nearly 1,200 years old in the time of Pliny, and still sound. The emperor Philip celebrated the secular games (recurring every 100 years), with great pomp, for the fifth time in the year 248. We may consider this event, for our present purpose, as a convenient finish of the classic period of antique art, and of the reflections of it in the woodwork and furniture and the sur- roundings of private life. Ten centuries had elapsed since Romulus had fortified the hills on the banks of the Tiber. “ During the first four ages ” (says Gibbon) “ the Romans, in the laborious school of poverty, had acquired the virtues of war and government ; by the vigorous exertion of these virtues, and by the assistance of fortune, they had obtained in the course of the three succeeding centuries an absolute empire over many countries of Europe, Asia, and Africa. The last three centuries had been consumed in apparent prosperity and internal decline.” CHAPTER IV. BYZANTINE ART. We may take as the next period for illustration the centuries that witnessed the break up of the old Roman constitution and the gradual formation of a new order of society down to the end of the first ten centuries of our era. Seven hundred and fifty years out of those ten hundred belong in great part to mediaeval history. The misfortunes of Italy, and the incessant state of war, inva- sion, and struggle in that pen- insula were too destructive of personal wealth and the means of showing it in costly furni- ture to leave us any materials from thence for our present subject. The history of furni- ture and woodwork, as applied to civil and social uses, now belongs to such civilisation as took its origin and its form from Constantinople. Art of these centuries is called Byzantine. The woodcut is from the chair of St. Peter in Rome, the oldest and most interesting relic of antique furniture in existence ; that is, of furniture made of wood and kept in use from the days of ancient Rome. But it has had repairs and additions, and a description of it shall be referred to in another section. D 2 3 6 FURNITURE. Byzantine art is a debased form of the classic, but with a large mixture of Greek ; not of the old classic Greek type which had long been exhausted, but of that Asiatic Greek which derived so much of its splendour from the rich but unimaginative decorations of Persia. The objects actually executed at Constantinople or by Byzantine artists now remaining can scarcely be included in a treatise on furniture. They are mostly caskets and other small pieces executed in metal or in ivory. Accounts of many interest- ing pieces of Byzantine sculpture will be found in the “ Descrip- tion of the ivories in the South Kensington museum.” Amongst them the diptychs of the consuls are not only the most important, but the most interesting to a treatise on furniture, as we see in them consular seats and thrones of many varieties. We may select amongst other examples the following, which can be studied in the museum or referred to in that work. For instance, n°- 368 (fully described in Mr, Maskell’s “ Ivories ”) is one leaf of a consular diptych of Anastasius Paulus Probus Sabinianus Pompeius. The consul is represented seated on a chair of very ornate character. It is like the old folding curule chairs of Rome, but with elements both of Greek and Egyptian ornamentation, such as belong to the massive marble seats, sup- ported by lions or leopards, with the heads sculptured above the upper joint of the hind legs. In the mouths of these lions’ heads are rings for the purpose of carrying the chair, and the top frame is ornamented with little panels and medallions containing winged masks and portrait heads of the consul and his family or of mem- bers of the imperial family. On each side of the seat are small winged figures of Victory standing on globes and holding circular tablets over their heads. These probably represent the front of the arms, and are supposed to have a bar stretching from the heads or the circular tablets to the back of the seat. This feature too is a continuation of types that are to be found on Greek vases and in the chairs of both Nineveh and Egypt. A low footstool with an embroidered cushion on it is under the feet of the consul, and FURNITURE. 37 another cushion, also embroidered, covers the seat. This repre- sents a chair of the sixth century. A seat still more like the curule chair, but with a high back, is represented in another ivory, n°- 270, in the South Kensington collection. This piece is a plaque or tablet with a bas-relief of two apostles seated. The chairs are formed of two curved and recurved pieces each side, which are jointed together at the point of intersection. One pair of these pieces is prolonged and con- nected by straight cross-bars, and forms a back. Two dolphins, with the heads touching the low front pieces and the tails sloping up and connected with the back, form the arms; This belongs to the ninth century. The lyre back, a form not unknown in old Greek and thence adopted among Roman fashions, is also to be seen in chairs on ivories and in manuscripts. Round cushions were hung on the back, others^eovered the seat. These are seen also figured in the mosaics ,of _Yemc^L and later of Monreale in Sicily which retained m|cf^W'The ^Byzantine spirit. The art of Sicily continued longer §&fej^ct^‘'Constantinople than that of most of its Italian provinces, and Venice preserved her old traditions far into the period of the European revival of art. The beds, as represented in manuscript illuminations, belong chiefly to religious compositions such as the Nativity, or visions appearing to saints in their sleep. They are couches in the old Roman form, or are supported on turned legs, from the frames of which valances hang down to the ground. Sometimes a curtain acts as a screen at the head or on one side, but testers are wanting. Chariots and carriages of all sorts remained more or less Roman in type. There were a greater number of waggons or carriages for the conveyance of women and families than had been in use in ancient times. Christianity had materially altered the social position of women, and they appeared in public or moved about with their families without the restraints which in the old Roman society forbad their appearance in chariots and open carriages. 38 FURNITURE . and made the covered couch or closed litter the usual conveyance for ladies of rank in Rome. Several forms of chariots or carriages of this larger kind can be seen in the sculptures of the column of Theodosius in Constantinople. The art and the domestic manners and customs that had been in fashion in Rome maintained themselves with some modifica- tions in Constantinople. The life there was more showy and pompous, but it was free from the cruelties and the corruption of the elder society. It was founded on the profession of Chris- tianity, and the numbers and magnificence of the religious hierarchy formed an important feature in the splendid social aspect of the Greek capital. The games of the circus, without the cruelties of gladiatorial combats, were maintained. Chariots were in constant use, much wealth was spent on their construc- tion, and chariot races were kept up. Furniture, such as chairs, couches, chests, caskets, mirrors and articles of the toilet, was exceedingly rich. Gold and silver were probably more abundant in the great houses of Constantinople than they had been in Rome. As the barbarous races of the east and north encroached on the flourishing provinces of the Roman empire, constant immigration took place to Constantinople and the provinces still under its sway. Families brought with them such property as could be easily moved, gold of course and jewels ; and, naturally, these precious materials were afterwards used for the decoration of their furniture and dress. The ancient custom of reclining at meals had ceased. The guests sat on benches or chairs. At the same time the “ triclinia aurea,” or golden dining room, was still the title of the great hall of audience in the palace at Constantinople. The term only served to illustrate the jealous retention of the old forms and names by the emperors and patricians. The last branch of the ancient empire did little for the arts of painting and sculpture, ’ though it long preserved the old traditions of art, gradually becoming more and more debased with every succeeding genera- FURNITURE. 39 tion, whilst outward splendour was increased because of the greater quantity of the precious metals that had accumulated or been inherited during so many centuries. The decay of art and skill in the old world was, however, counter- balanced by the rise of new societies, which were gradually being formed in various parts of the empire. These consisted partly of the races of Huns, Goths, Saxons, and others, who had invaded Italy and settled themselves in it, partly of the old municipal corporations, 'who defended their property and maintained their privileges in the great walled towns of Italy. The cities profited to a great extent by this infusion of new blood ; and became the parents of the future provinces of Italy, so rich in genius and industry, so wealthy and powerful in peace and war. The most important of them was Venice, and it is in Venice that, in the later middle ages, we find the birthplace of most of the art with which the furniture and utensils of home and warlike use were so profusely decorated. We point to Constantinople as the last stronghold of the old arts of the Roman period, but it is because it was from the Greeks that the new states borrowed their first notions of art. Nearly all the early art we meet with throughout the west in manuscripts and ivories bears a Byzantine character. A remarkable piece of monumental furniture has survived from these early centuries of the Christian era, half Byzantine and half western in character, the chair of St. Maximian of Ravenna, pre- served in the treasury at Ravenna, and engraved and described in the “ Arts Somptuaires ” of M. Du Sommerard. Ravenna was the portion of the empire that most intimately connected the east with the west. The domed churches of San Vitale, San Giovanni in Fonte, the tomb of Galla Placidia, the round church of Santa Maria, built by Theodoric, together with the great basilica of Saint Apollinare in Chiasse, and others of the Latin form, unite the characteristics of the eastern and western architecture. What is true of architecture can also be pronounced as to painting, 40 FURNITURE . sculpture, textile fabrics, and all decoration applied to objects, sacred or domestic, that were in daily use. But events occurred in the declining state of the empire that went far to transfer what remained of art to northern Europe. The sect of the iconoclasts, or image-breakers, rose into power and authority under the emperor Leo the Isaurian, who published an edict in 726 condemnatory of the veneration and use of reli- gious images and paintings. During a century this principle was at work, and it caused the destruction not only of innumerable antique statues, such as those defaced in the Parthenon of Athens, but the loss of vast quantities of ivory and wood sculpture and precious objects of all kinds. Many artists took refuge in western Europe, and were welcomed in the Rhenish provinces of the empire by Charlemagne. How much ancient and domestic art in the form of bronze or other metal furniture, such as chairs, thrones, tripods, &c., whole or in fragments, survived the taking of Constantinople by Mahomet II. we cannot conjecture. Perhaps the royal palaces, or still more possibly the mosques which have been the banks and depositories of family treasures under Mahometan rule, may contain valuable bronzes, ivories, and carved wood, relics of the luxurious life of the latter days of the Greek empire, and such evidences may some day come to light. No doubt, however, much antique art and much that belonged to the first eight centuries of our era survived the ordinary shocks of time and war, only to be destroyed by the quiet semi-judicial action of a furious sect protected by imperial decrees, after the manner in which mediaeval art suffered under the searching powers of fanatical government commissioners in our own country, in the sixteenth century. It is to the impulse which the Lombard and Frankish monarchs gave to art in western and northern Europe by the protection of Greek refugee sculptors and artists that we should trace the beginnings of the northern school called Rhenish- Byzantine. CHAPTER V. THE MIDDLE AGES. We cannot easily determine on a date at which we can assign a beginning to mediaeval art. It differs from the art that succeeded it in the sixteenth century in many respects, and from the late classic art that preceded it still more widely. That peculiar character which we call romantic enters into the art of mediaeval times, as it does into the literature and manners of the same ages. It took a living form in .fhj^half religious institution of chivalry. The northern nations grew up under the leadership of monks quite as much as under that of kings. They lived in territories only partially cleared from forests, pushed their way forward to power pioneered by the great religious orders, and their world was one surrounded by opportunities of endless adventures. But this romantic standard, though it took its rise from the times in which the Christians carried their lives in their hands, under the persecuting emperors, did not pervade Europe for many centuries. Classic art, in its decay, still furnished both forms and symbols, such, e.g ., as that of Orpheus, to the new societies, and the names of Jupiter, Mercury, and Saturn, have survived as the titles of days of the week. The two art traditions overlapped each other for a while. Medievalism grew very gradually. We have just said that Charlemagne welcomed Byzantine artists to the Rhine. It must be remembered, however, that the Roman empire had been firmly planted beyond the Alps, and that Gaul produced good Roman art in the second and third centuries. 4 2 FURNITURE. Architecture, sculpture, bronze casting, and the numberless appliances of daily life were completely Roman in many parts of France and Britain. The theatres and amphitheatres of Arles and Orange and the collections in various museums are enough to show how extended this character was. It was not till the old traditions had been much developed or modified by oriental influences that a thorough mediaeval character of art was estab- lished in Italy, France, Germany, and England. To the last it remained semi-classic in Rome itself. We can give reference to few specimens of household furniture or to woodwork of any kind before the eleventh century, with a great exception to be noticed presently. Ivories, in any form, belonging to these ages are rare. The best objects are Byzantine. Anglo-saxon ivories, though not unknown, are all but unique examples. Ivory was probably rarely employed for any objects of secular use, unless on mirror cases, combs, or the thrones of kings ; on horns, caskets, sword hilts, and the like. Metallurgy in the precious metals and in bronze, including the gilding of bronze, was probably the one art that survived the de- parture, if it had not even preceded the invasion, of the Romans in Britain. It is scarcely probable that tin and copper ores would have been sought for from Britain if manufactured orna- ments of metal had not found their way in the first instance from this country to the south. Be that, however, as it may, the art of metallurgy survived the downfall of such architectural and sculpturesque skill as had been attained in England under Roman traditions ; and that metal thrones, chairs, and other utensils were made here as in Gaul can hardly be doubted. There is an interesting collection, lately bequeathed by Mr. Gibbs, of Saxon ornaments in gold, bronze, and bronze ornamented with gilding and enamel, in the South Kensington museum. These objects were dug up chiefly at Faversham, a village in Kent. Most of these antiquities are fibula, brooches, and buckles, or portions of horse trappings, bosses, &c., and not recognisable as parts of FURNITURE. 43 bronze furniture, such as the chair of Dagobert. But it is difficult to examine these personal ornaments and not believe that during the Saxon occupation bronze thrones, tripods, mirrors, and other objects of household use were also made. The earliest example of mediaeval furniture in the Kensington museum is a cast of the chair known as that of Dagobert, in the Louvre. A full description found in the large catalogue, n°* 68 : and we here give a woodcut of it. This work (it is said) was executed by a monk. When we consider the rapacity of the barbarian in- roads into Italy and Rome, and the amount of spoil carried bodijy’^awiy^^ Constantinople Rpm^ x ahd the great municipal cej^res of Italy, it is remarkable that so little precious furniture should have survived in other parts of Europe. The Goths under Adolphus in the fifth century carried an immense plunder into Gaul and Spain. “ When the treasuries, after the conquest of Spain/’ says Gibbon, “ were plundered by the Arabs, they admired, and they have celebrated, a table of considerable size, of one single piece of solid emerald [that is, glass], encircled with three rows of fine pearls, supported by three hundred and sixty-five feet of gems and massy gold, esti- mated at the price of five hundred thousand pieces of gold,” — probably the most expensive table on record. It is the value of the materials that has prevented the preservation of many such objects, while the chair of Dagobert is of gilt bronze only. Early mediaeval art, included under the general name of Gothic, and history of this chair is to be 44 FURNITURE. continued down to the twelfth century full of Romanesque forms and details. Figures were clothed in classic draperies, but stiff and severe with upright lines and childish attempts to indicate the limbs or joints beneath. Nevertheless, the work of these cen- turies, rude and archaic as it is, is full of dignity and force. The subjects were often sacred, sometimes of war or incidents of the chase. These last were commonly mixed with animals, lions and dogs, or eagles and hawks, or leaves of the acanthus and other foliage. Throughout these ages the foliated sculpture, the paint- ings of books and carving of ivory, and no doubt of wood also, was, moreover, composed in endless convolutions, such as may be seen on sculptured stones in Ireland and on the Norwegian doors of the twelfth century. Whether the different convolutions are formed by figures or dragons, or by stalks of foliage twined and knotted together in bold curved lines, symmetrically arranged, each portion is generally carefully designed and traceable through many windings as having a distinct intention and purpose. Orna- mental work was thus apparently conventional, but made up of individual parts separately carried out, and in some degree, though not altogether, realistic: a character gradually lost after the early thirteenth century till the new revival in the sixteenth. The tenth century was not favourable to the development of the requirements or comfort of personal life. Towards the year one thousand a superstition prevailed over many parts of Europe that the world would come to an end when the century was com- pleted ; and many fields were left uncultivated in the year 999. The eleventh century made a great advance in architecture and other arts, but down to the Norman invasion our own country was far behind the continental nations in the fine arts ; metal- lurgy only excepted. The Anglo-saxons perhaps advanced but very slowly, as the century wore on to the period of the Norman conquest ; and manners remained exceedingly simple. Early illuminations, though conventional, give us some details of Anglo-saxon houses. They were of one story, and contained FURNITURE. 45 generally only one room. The addition of a second was rare before the Norman conquest. The furniture of the room consisted of a heavy table, sometimes fixed ; on which the inhabitants of the house and the guests slept. A bedstead was occasionally reserved for the mistress of the house. Bedsteads when used by the women or the lord of the house were enclosed in a shed under the wall of enclosure and had a separate roof, as may be seen in many manuscripts. In the Bayeux tapestry a bed roof is tiled, and the framework shut in with curtains. In many instances such a design represents only a tester with posts. Otherwise beds of straw stuffed into a bag or case were spread on the table, and soldiers laid their arms by their heads ready for use in case of alarm. Benches, some with lion or other heads at the corners, like elongated chairs or settles (with backs, for the lord and lady of the house), were the usual seats. Thrones, something like that of Dagobert, were the property of kings. King Edward the Confessor is seated on such a chair (metal, and in the Roman shape) in the Bayeux tapestry, and folding chairs of various forms, more or less following classical types, were used by great person- ages. Benches were also used as beds ; so were the lids or tops of chests, the sack or bag being sometimes kept in it and filled with straw when required. The tables were covered with cloths at dinner. Stained cloths and tapestries, commonly worked with pictorial designs, were used to hang the walls of the house or hall. They were called wah-hrsegel, wall coverings. Personal clothing was kept in chests of rude construction. Silver candlesticks were used in churches. Candles were stuck anywhere in houses, on beams or ledges. With regard to carriages during the Saxon and Anglo-norman period, carts on two wheels were common for agricultural use, and served to transport the royal property, Four-wheeled cars drawn by hand labour are used for carrying warlike stores in the Bayeux tapestry. In the battle of the Standard the standard of the English host was carried on a wheeled car or 46 FURNITURE. platform, and remained as the head-quarters or rallying point during action. The Norman invasion of England caused a new advance in the luxury and refinement, such as it was, of daily life. The houses began to grow — upper rooms or rooms at the side of the great hall were added, called solars (solaria), the sunny or light rooms. These seem to have been appropriated to the ladies. In due time they added a parloir or talking room, a name derived from the rooms in which conversation was allowed in monasteries where silence was the general rule. In the upper rooms fire- places were made occasionally, but not always chimneys. In the halls, when the upper room did not cover the whole under room or when an upper room was not constructed, fire was made in the centre of the floor. Stairs were of wood. Glass was all but un- known in the windows of houses, and wooden shutters kept out the weather. The houses of landowners in England were called manoir or manor. The furniture was simple and consisted of few objects. The table was on trestles ; the seats were benches. Armaria , armoires, cupboards or presses, either stood in recesses in the wall or were complete wooden enclosures. These had doors opening horizontally. The frames were not panelled. The doors were ledge doors of boards, nailed to stout cross-bars behind, and de- corated with iron hinges and clamps beaten out into scrolls and other ornaments. Bedrooms were furnished with ornamental bed testers, and benches at the bed foot. Beds were furnished with quilts and pillows, and with spotted or striped linen sheets ; over all was laid a covering of green say, badgers’ furs, the skins of beavers or of FURNITURE. 47 martin cats, and a cushion. A perch for falcons to sit on was fixed in the wall. A chair at the bed head, and a perch or pro- jecting pole on which clothes could be hung, completed the furni- ture of the Anglo-norman bedroom. In the foregoing wood- cut from Willemin there is no tester, but carving on the posts, and the coverings are of the richest description. Woodwork was decorated with painted ornament or with fanci- ful work on the hinges ; and nails and clamps were applied to hold it together, rather than with sculpture, down to the fourteenth century ; and in England, France, and Germany, oak was the wood employed for furniture. Both in England and in the countries which had retained old artistic traditions on the con- tinent, such as Italy, France, and Spain (which profited by the skill of the Moors in painted decoration), colour was used not less on walls and wood than on metal and pottery. Tapestry was an important portion of the ifubnifure of all houses of the richer classes. . During the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries mediaeval art in Europe reached its greatest perfection. The classic traditions were at last forgotten everywhere except in Rome itself, where a chain lingered almost continuous between the old ideas and those which succeeded in the sixteenth century. Elsewhere the feeling in sculpture, whether of wood or other materials, was in unison with the pointed architecture and reigned unchallenged. All sorts of enrichments were used in the decoration of furniture. A chest of the time of John is preserved in the castle of Rocking- ham. It is of oak richly decorated with hammered iron plates, hinges, &c. The jewel chest of Richard of Cornwall was long preserved in the state treasury of Aix-la-Chapelle, and is now at Vienna. It belongs to the first half of the century, and was left at Aix when Richard was crowned king of the Romans. The body is of oak decorated with wrought-iron hinges, lock, and clamps, and with bosses of metal on which are enamelled heraldic shields. 4 S FURNITURE. The construction of woodwork gradually became more careful and scientific. Panelled framework came into use, though seldom for doors of rooms. With this method of construction the chests were put together that formed the chief article of furniture during two centuries in the mediaeval sleeping, sitting, or private room. In the middle of the thirteenth century Eleanor of Provence was escorted on her journey to England by an army of ladies, knights, nobles and troubadours, from Provence to the shores of the channel. Kings were continually making progress in this manner through their dominions, like the Indian governors of our own days, and carried their furniture and property in chests, called standards, on the backs of mules or sumpter horses. Portable furniture and hangings were the principal objects of household use on such occasions, A precept in the twentieth year of the reign of Henry the third directed that “ the king’s great chamber at Westminster be painted a green colour like a curtain, that in the great gable or frontispiece of the said chamber a French inscription should be painted, and that the king’s little wardrobe should be painted of a green colour to imitate a curtain.” The queen’s chamber was decorated with historical paintings. Remains of similar wall decoration are in tolerable preservation still in one of the vaulted rooms of Dover castle. Till the fourteenth century candles were generally placed on a beam in the hall, whether in the castle of a king or baron. Frames of wood with prickets were also suspended for the light- ing of rooms, or were fixed to the sides of the fire-place when that was made in the wall and had a chimney constructed for it. More generally, as regards halls, the hearth was in the middle of the room and a lantern just above it in the roof acted as a chimney. Iron chandeliers, or branches, were ordered to be fixed to the piers of the king’s halls at Oxford, Winchester, and other places. Though the royal table might be lighted with valuable candesticks of metal, they were not in general use till a century later. Besides the numerous rows of tallow candles pieces FURNITURE . 49 of pine wood were lighted and stuck into iron hasps in the wall, or round the woodwork at the back of the dais to give more abundant light. The wardrobe was a special room fitted with hanging closets, and in these clothes, hangings, linen, as well as spices and stores, were preserved. This arrangement was common in all large castles during the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth centuries. Great preparations were made in the bedrooms of queens of England to which they retired before the birth of children. Henry the third directed that his queen’s bedroom should be freshly wainscoted and lined, and that a list or border should be made, well painted with images of our Lord and angels, with incense pots scattered over it ; that the four evangelists should be painted in the chamber, and a crystal vase be made to keep his collection of relics. Room panelling was introduced into England during the same reign. Henry ordered a chamber at Windsor castle to be panelled with Norway pines specially im- ported ; the men worked day and night. The boards were radiated and coloured, and two clear days only were allowed for the fixing and completion. Edward the first married a Spanish queen, and household furniture was further developed under his reign in many parti- culars. Pottery for the table was imported from Spain, and oriental carpets were introduced ; a luxury naturally borrowed from the ex- tensive use of them by the Moors in that country. Italian artists had already been invited to England. Master William, the E 50 FURNITURE . Florentine, was master of the works at Guildford castle. John of St. Omer was another foreign artist employed by Henry the third. To the former of these we probably owe the introduction into this country of the method of gilding and tooled gold work, with which wood was decorated. Specimens of the work are still discernible on the famous coronation chair (of which we give a woodcut, p. 49) ^Westminster abbey; made about the year 1300. The decoration and comfort of furnished houses during Henry’s reign was further promoted by the general use of tapestry. Queen Eleanor is traditionally and incorrectly said to have first brought this kind of furniture into houses ; it was certainly adopted for churches at earlier periods, and hangings of various materials, stained or embroidered, were employed as far back as the Anglo- saxon times. Tapestries and cypress chests to carry them probably became more general in Eleanor’s reign. Amongst the particulars collected in the history of the city companies and by the record commission are lists of the royal plate, showing that objects of personal use besides table plate were made in silver and gold. We find mention of pitchers of gold and silver, plates and dishes of silver, gold salts, alms bowls, silver hannapers or baskets, a pair of knives with enamelled silver sheaths, a fork of crystal, and a silver fork with handle of ebony and ivory, combs and looking-glasses of silver. Edward had six silver forks and one of gold. Ozier mats were laid over the benches on which he and his queen sat at meals. These were also put under the feet, especially in churches where the pavement was of stone or tiles. In the furniture of bedrooms linen chests and settles, cupboards and the beds themselves were of panelled wood. The next wood- cut shows the interior of a well-furnished bedroom, from a manu- script life of St. Edmund written about the year 1400. Chests served as tables, and are often represented with chess-boards on them in old illuminations, and husband and wife sitting on the chest and using it for the game, which had become familiar to most FURNITURE . 5i European nations. Chests of later date than the time of Edward, of Italian make, still show the same use of the lids of coffers. As the tops of the coffers served for tables and for seats they began in the thirteenth century to be furnished with a panelled back and arm-pieces at either end. This development of the chest was equally common in France. It does not seem to have been placed on legs or to have grown into a cabinet till a later period. The raised dorsal or back of the seats in large rooms was a protection from the cold, and in the rude form of a settle is still the comfort of old farm and inn kitchens in this country ; it became the general type of seats of state in the great halls, and E 2 52 FURNITURE. was there further enlarged by a canopy projecting forwards to protect the heads of the sitters, panelled also in oak. In the fifteenth century in many instances this hood or canopy was attached to the panelling of the upper end of the hall, and covered the whole of that side of the dais. The backing and canopy were sometimes replaced by temporary arrangements of hangings, as in modern royal throne rooms, the cloth being called cloth of estate and generally embroidered with heraldic devices. Panelled closets called dressoirs or cupboards, to lock up food, were general in properly furnished rooms ; a cloth was laid on the top at meals, with lights, and narrow shelves rose in steps at the back for the display of plate, the steps varying in number according to the rank of the persons served. Tables used at meals were generally frames of boards, either in one piece or folding in the middle. These were laid on trestles, as in the woodcut from an early manuscript in the Bodleian library, and could be removed as soon as the dinner was over, so that the company might dance and divert themselves. Somewhat later, about the year 1450, the tables although still on trestles were made more solidly, even for the use of people of the middle class. All houses, however, even of kings could not be completely or even comfortably furnished in such a manner, far less those of feudal lords, not princes or sovereigns. The kings moved inces- santly to their various strongholds and manors in time of peace to collect dues and revenues, much of which was paid in kind and FURNITURE. 53 could only be profitably turned to account by carrying the Court to different estates arid living on their produce as long as it lasted. Orders were continually sent to sheriffs to provide food, linen 54 FURNITURE . and other requisites, while hangings and furniture were carried by the train in its progress. Much of the household belongings of persons of wealth was, therefore, of a movable kind. We engrave (p. 53) a very curious table standing on a pedestal shaped like a chalice, from a manuscript of the beginning of the fifteenth century. The ladies are playing at cards. A most oppressive privilege was exercised in France, which went beyond the legal right of the lord or owner to the rents of his estates whether paid in money, agricultural produce, or manu- factures carried on in his towns or villages. This was the droit de prisage , a privilege of seizing furniture of all kinds by the hands of stewards and others for the use of the king. Chairs, tables, and beds particularly were included in these requisitions. The droit de prisage was modified at various times in consequence of the remonstrance of the commons at so oppressive an exaction ; but as late as the year 1365 Charles the fifth seized beds. In 1313 Philippe le Bel entertained the English king and his queen at Pontoise with no other furniture than such as had been seized in this manner. A fire broke out in the night during their stay, the furniture was consumed, and the royal personages escaped in their shirts. It was not till 1407 that this privilege was finally abandoned. Though the usual conveyance during the thirteenth century was a horse litter for women of rank, and men rode on horseback, yet covered and open carriages or waggons were not unknown in that and in the following century. A charette containing a number of maids of honour in attendance on Anne of Bohemia at her public reception in London in 1392, was upset on London bridge from the rush of the crowd to get a sight of the queen, and her ladies were not without difficulty replaced. These charettes, cars, or waggons were covered carts on four wheels, like country waggons of our days, panelled at the sides, and the tilt covered with leather, sometimes with lead, and painted. We must not pass without a very brief notice the large construe- FURNITURE . 55 lions of roofs of wood begun as early as the twelfth, and continued and improved through the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, the period during which the finest efforts of mediaeval Gothic art were embodied all over the north and over parts of the south of Europe. The older part of Westminster hall dates from the reign of Rufus, and the walls of the present building belong to that period, though faced at a later time. How the roof of the' enormous space, sixty-five feet diameter, was at first con- structed there is no -^videiiceTo show. It had, pei^aps, ^. row or, arches down the^niiddle, like the great hall of the^p^fede of Blois, said to be of the thirteenth century, or huge kingposts sup- porting the ties between rafters, which in that case may have been as long as those of the later roof. The present roof, work of the fourteenth century, marks the beginning of a change in the style of architecture that accom- panied and caused great changes in furniture and household woodwork. The ties are supported by curved braces that descend like arches on the stone corbels made in the wall to receive them. These braces take two flights, being tied back where they meet by hammer beams into a lower part of the rafter. The lower brace upholds another upright or collar post which supports the FURNITURE . 56 junction of these beams with the rafter, at its weakest part. A rich subdivision of upright mullions with cusped arch heads fills up the spandrels between these braces and the beams they support, and adds stiffness as well as decoration to the whole. Such constructions were not only more scientific than those of older date, but they are more pompous and complicated, and have a greater apparent affinity with the architecture of the day. This architectural character, from the date of the change to the third period of pointed architecture, began to show itself in furniture and wood structure of every kind. Until then a certain originality and inventiveness were preserved in the decoration both of architective woodwork and furniture, notwithstanding the strictest observance of the rules and unities of architectural law in buildings, ecclesiastical and civil. Small sculpture, such as that on ivories and utensils made of metal, or that which deco- rated woodwork as well as stone, and the general forms of furniture, were designed without immediate imitation of archi- tectonic detail. Figure sculpture of great dignity remains in ivories of the twelfth, thirteenth, and fourteenth centuries, illus- trative of the general character given to things of daily use which were not, probably, nearly so numerous as in a later age, and were each carefully elaborated for the person for whom they were made. We need go no further than some of the objects in the Kensington museum, such as the statuettes and caskets of ivory, English and French work of that time. We can point to few large pieces of furniture, except the coronation chair, illustrating the fashions of this early period. Examples of wooden movable furniture are extremely rare in this country. There are large semicircular cope chests in the cathedrals of Wells, York, and other cities. These are merely chests or boxes in which the copes are spread out full size, one over the other, and the only decoration consists in the floriated ironwork attached to the hinges. FURNITURE. 57 We must not omit to remark that some examples of very beautiful oriental panelling of this period are to be seen in various collections. The woodcuts represent the fittings of a series of such panels from a mosque at Cairo, now at South Kensington, n° - 1,051 ; and a single piece to show the detail. FURNITURE. 53 The delicacy of the carving and the apparent intricacy of the geometrical arrangement are very remarkable. A royal dinner table, from a manuscript of the fourteenth century. CHAPTER VI. THE FIFTEENTH CENTURY. In discussing the great wood structures such as screens, house fronts, roofs, and other large pieces of mechanism, which deve- loped in boldness and variety in the fifteenth century, we must not forget that the abundance of oak timber in the north of Europe both suggested much of this timber art and admitted of bold features of construction from the size of the logs and the tenacity of the material. A large portion of England and per- haps an equal proportion of Ireland were covered with dense forests of oak. The eastern frontier of France, great portions of Burgundy, and many other districts in France, Germany, Flanders, and other northern countries, were still forests, and timber was to be had at low prices and in any quantity. Spanish chestnut had been introduced probably by the Romans into England. Though churches, castles, and manors were built of stone or brick, or both, yet whole cities seem to have been mainly con- structed out of timber. The London of the fifteenth century, like a hundred other cities, though abounding in noble churches and in great fortified palaces, yet presented the aspect of a timber city. The houses were framed together, as a few still are in some English towns and villages, of vast posts sixteen to twenty- four inches square in section, arching outwards and meeting the projecting floor timbers, and so with upper stories, till the streets were darkened by the projections. The surfaces of these posts 6o FURNITURE . were covered with delicate tracery, niches and images. In the streets at Chester an open gallery or passage is left on the first floor within the timbers of the house fronts. In the court of St. Mary’s guild in Coventry, whole chambers and galleries are supported on vast arches of timber like bridges. Oriels jutted out under these overhanging stories, and the spaces between the framing posts were filled in, sometimes with bricks, sometimes with laths and mortar, or parts (as the century wore on) more frequently with glass* In London and Rouen, in Blois and in Coventry, these angle posts were filled with niches and statuettes or fifteenth century window tracery sunk into the surfaces. The dark wooden houses were externally a mass of imagery. In the great roofs of these centuries, such as the one spoken of at Westminster, the hammer beams were generally carved into figures of angels gracefully sustaining the timber behind them with outstretched wings ; and these figures were painted and gilt. A magnificent example remains intact in the church of Knapton in Norfolk. The number of excellent workmen and the size and architectural character of so much of the woodwork of the day contributed to give all panelled work, no matter of what description, an archi- tectural type ; and furniture shared in this change. Coffers and chests, as well as standards or stall-ends in churches, and bench-ends in large rooms and halls, were designed after the pattern of window tracery. The panel in the above woodcut from a French chest of this date, is a very delicate and beautiful example. Little buttresses and pinnacles were often placed on the angles or the divisions between the panels. At South Ken- FURNITURE . 6 1 sington, the buffet, n°* 8,439 an d the chest, no. 2,789, with other pieces are of this kind; also a grand cabinet of German make in the same collection. This last, n°- 497, is of the rudest construction, but a few roughly cut lines of moulding and some effective ironwork give it richness and dignity that are wanting in many pieces more scientifically made and more decoratively treated. The quantity of tapestry employed in these centuries in fitting up houses and the tents used either during a campaign or in pro- gresses from one estate to another was prodigious, and kept increasing.. Lancaster entertained the king of Portugal in his tent between Mou^al and Malga^o, fitted up with hangings of arras “as if he had been at Hertford, Leicester, or any of his manors.” As early as 1313, when Isabel of Bavaria made her entry into Paris, the whole street of St. Denis, Froissart tells us, “ was covered with a canopy of rich camlet and silk cloths, as if they had the cloths for nothing, or were at Alexandria or Damascus. I (the writer of this account) was present, and was astonished whence such quantities of rich stuffs and ornaments could have come, for all the houses on each side of the street of St. Denis, as far as the Chatelet, or indeed to the great bridge, were hung with tapestries representing various scenes and histo- ries, to the delight of all beholders.” The expense incurred in timber work on these occasions may be estimated from the long lists of pageants, and the scale on which each was prepared on this and like occasions. Of the early Italian furniture of the mediaeval period there is at South Kensington one fine specimen, a coffer of cypress, covered with flat surface imagery filled in with coloured wax composition. It dates from the fourteenth century. The better known Italian furniture of the quattrocento or “ fourteen hundred period,” i.e. the fifteenth century, is gilt and painted. The richness of this old work is owing to the careful preparation of the ground or bed on which the gold is laid and the way in which the preparation 62 FURNITURE . was modelled with the tool. The old gold is, besides, both thicker and purer, more malleable, and less liable to suffer from the action of the atmosphere than the gold we now use for this purpose. The paintings executed on such pieces of furniture as offered suitable surfaces to the artist, boxes and coffers (and, for church uses, reliquaries), are equal to the finest works of that kind and of the same period. Many artists worked in this way. Dello Delli was the best known in regard to such productions. His work became so entirely the fashion that, according to Vasari, no house was com- plete without a specimen of it. Andrea di Cosimo was another. It need not be said that such men and their contemporaries had a number of pupils similarly employed. Every piece of painted furniture attributed to Dello Delli cannot be warranted. There are, however, specimens which we believe to be from his hand in the Kensington collection, and numbers of fronts and panels and fragments of great merit which illustrate his style. Besides this kind of decoration, the Venetians had derived from Persia and India another beautiful system of surface ornament ; marquetry, a fine inlay of ivory, metal, and woods, stained to vary the colour. The work is in geometric patterns only. It is found on the ivory boxes and other objects sculptured in that material, and attributed to Italian as well as to Byzantine sources. In the fifteenth century Florence also came prominently to the front in the manufacture of these and other rich materials ; as well as of ivory inlaid into solid cypress wood and walnut, known as Certosina work. The style is Indian in character, and consists in geometric arrangements of stars made of diamond-shaped pieces : varied with conventional flowers in pots, &c. The name Certosina is derived from the great Certosa, charterhouse, or Carthusian monastery between Milan and Pavia : where this kind of decoration is employed in the choir fittings of the splendid church of that monastery. We are inclined to the belief (as already said) that the manu- FURNITURE. 63 facture of geometrical work of this kind was originally imported from Persia by the Venetians. There are in the Kensington museum some very interesting old chairs made for the castle of Urbino, and part of the furniture of Guidobaldo II., whose court, like that of Rene, king of Provence, was the resort of troubadours, poets, and philosophers. These chairs are covered with geo- metric marquetry of white and stained ivory, &c., the very counterpart of the Bombay work now brought to this country. That manufacture, in the opinion of Dr. Birdwood, was also of Persian origin and thence found its way to Bombay. The Persians continued long into the last century the inlaying of ivory in walnut wood, and their geometric marquetry is still made. The forms of chairs in use in Italy early in the fifteenth century were revivals of the old Roman folding chair. The pairs of cross- pieces are sometimes on the sides, sometimes set back and front, and in that case arm and back__pigces are added. Generally we may say that the fine Italian furniture of that day owed its beauty to inlaying, surface gilding, hfclmg and fainting. Gilt chests and marriage trays, inlaid tabW, and chairs are also to be seen at South Kensington. As in Italy, so in England, France, Germany, and later in Spain, the splendour hitherto devoted to the glory of ecclesiastical furniture, utensils, or architectural decoration was gradually adopted in the royal and other castles and houses. State rooms, halls of justice, sets of rooms for the use of the king or his barons were furnished and maintained. The large religious esta- blishments also demanded the skill of artists and workmen, and to a greater extent north than south of the Alps. Many monastic houses in the north of Europe were seats of feudal jurisdiction. These communities executed great works in wood, stall-work, presses, coffers, &c., as large and continuous societies alone are able to carry through tasks that want much time for completion. All this helped to encourage the manufacture of woodwork of the finest kind. Hence the mediaeval semi-ecclesiastical character 6 4 FURNITURE . maintained sway in every art connected with architecture and furniture longer in northern countries than in Italy, where both old traditions and monumental remains recalled rather the glories of antique art, and where the revival of classic learning had begun. As regards English art it is certain that, partly from the influence of foreign queens, partly from foreign wars, and partly from the incessant intercourse with the rest of Europe kept up by religious houses, many of the accomplishments of other countries were known and practised here by foreign or native artists* It is true that the wars of the Roses, more bloody and ruinous than any experienced in this country, delayed that growth of domestic luxury which might have been expected from the then wealth of England. But when Henry the seventh established a settled government, and from his time downwards, the decorations and the accumulation of furniture in houses, libraries, and collec- tions of works of art rapidly increased. Many of the books in the “ King’s library,” and many pictures and movables still in pos- session of the crown, may be traced to that day. It is difficult, indeed, to imagine the England which Leland saw in his travels. It must have been full of splendid objects, and during the reign of Henry the feudal mansions, as well as the numerous royal palaces of Windsor, Richmond, Havering, and others, were filled with magnificent furniture. Mabuse and Torrigiano were employed by the king, and this example found many imitations ; artists, both foreign and English, made secular furniture, as rich and beautiful as that of the churches and religious houses which covered the country. Taste in furniture, as in architecture, both in continental Europe and in these islands had nevertheless passed the fine period of mediaeval design. The “ Gothic ” or pointed forms and details had become uninventive and commonplace. The whole system awaited a change. The figure sculpture, however, of the latter years of this century, though life-sized statues had lost FURNITURE. 65 much of the dignity and simplicity of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries, was approaching the realization of natural form, which it attained in such excellence in the succeeding century. The ingenuity and raciness of the smaller figure carving both in stall- work of churches and on the tops and fronts of boxes and caskets, in panel-work of cabinets or doors, &c., during the last half of the fifteenth century are scarcely surpassed by the more academic and classical figure design of the sixteenth. Carvers on all kinds of wood furniture and decoration of houses delighted in doubling their figures up into quaint and ingenious attitudes, and if the architecture was latterly tame, though showy and costly, imagery continued to be full of individuality and inventiveness. F CHAPTER VII. THE RENAISSANCE IN ITALY. There are few matters regarding art more worthy of considera- tion than the narrowness of the limits that bound human inven- tion : or, to speak more exactly, we should say the simplicity of the laws and principles in obedience to which the imaginations of men are exercised. The return of the painters, sculptors, and architects to the old types of classical art after the reign of the Gothic seems at first sight as if in the arts there could be nothing new under the sun : as if the imagination, so fertile in creation during many centuries since the establishment of Christianity, had been utterly worked out and come to an end, and that there was nothing left but to repeat and copy what had been done ages before. There is, however, in reality more connection between classic and mediaeval art than appears on the surface, and although all the great masters of the revival studied eagerly such remains ol antique art as were discovered in Italy during the early years of the renaissance, they only came into direct contact with or abso- lute imitation of those models occasionally; and the works of that age have a grace that is peculiarly their own, and an inven- tiveness in painting and sculpture, if not in architecture, that seems, when we look at such cities as Venice and Florence, inexhaustible. The renaissance began in Italy many years before the year 1500. Most changes, indeed, of manners or arts which are designated by any century are perhaps more correctly dated FURNITURE. 67 twenty years before or after its beginning, and in the notices which we are here putting together we are compelled to make divisions of time occasionally overlap each other. The revival of learning in Italy was accompanied by other cir- cumstances which had a powerful influence on the arts, and par- ticularly on the sumptuary arts of the century. It has been already remarked that while the nations of Europe were more or less convulsed with war it was not easy or possible for the in- habitants, even the wealthy, to do much in furnishing dwelling- houses with any kind of comfort. Rich furniture consisted in a few costly objects and in hangings such as could be carried about on sumpter horses or in waggons, and, with the addition of rough benches, tables, and bedsteads, could make bare walls look gay and comfortable, and offer sufficient accommodation in the empty halls of granges and manors seldom lived in, for the occasions of a visit or a temporary occupation. Churches indeed were in those ages respected by both sides in the furious contests that raged throughout Europe. The violation of holy places was a crime held in abhorrence by all combatants, and the treasuries and sacristies, therefore, of churches were full of examples of every kind of accomplishment possessed by the artists of the day. They contained objects collected there during many generations, as was the case of shrines like that of the Virgin del Pillar in Spain, of which the offerings so long preserved have been very lately sold and dispersed, and represented the art of many suc- cessive ages. But in private houses it was scarcely possible to have any corresponding richness, though in the instance of kings and potentates there was often much splendour. As in England the fifteenth century saw the close of a series of great wars and the establishment of one powerful government, so during its conclusion and the beginning of the next century a similar disorder gradually gave place to tranquillity in Italy. The practices of painting gilt furniture of all kinds, and of modelling terra-cotta work on the wood, were not altogether new f 2 68 FURNITURE. accomplishments or confined to the artists of one city. When, therefore, the French having been driven out of Italy, the popes were in security in Rome and the accomplished Medici family reigned in Florence, those states as well as Urbino, Ferrara, and other independent cities were free from the perpetual attitude of defence against foreign invasion ; they could indulge their enthu- siasm for classic art, and the impulse given to the study of it found a ready response, as great noblemen while building palaces and digging gardens came upon statues, frescoes, vases, bronzes, and many glorious remnants of antiquity. In the various Italian states were artists well skilled and carefully trained, and there was no difficulty in finding distinguished names with whole schools of enthusiastic admirers behind them who, with these precious objects in their view, formed their style on the old classic models. We are to consider such acquirements here only so far as they came to be applied to secular woodwork (of which this cornice from Venice is an example) and the objects of daily use; to coffers, chests, caskets, mirrors, or cabinets, sideboards of various kinds, seats, tables, carriages and furniture of every description. The best artists of the day did not hesitate to give their minds to the making of woodwork and furniture in various materials and employed every kind of accomplishment in beautifying them. Of this fine renaissance period there are so many examples in the South Kensington collection, and some of them of such excel- lence, that* the student need scarcely have occasion to travel FURNITURE. 6g beyond the limits of that museum to illustrate the quattrocento and cinquecento furniture and woodwork. Many materials were employed by the renaissance artists. Wood first and principally in making furniture, but decorated with gilding and paintings ; inlaid with agate, carnelian, lapis lazuli and marbles of various tints ; with ivory, tortoiseshell, mother-of-pearl ; and with other woods. They also made many smaller objects, such as mirror cases in iron, damascened or in- laid with gold and silver. For many years, however, mirrors continued to be of polished metal, the enrichment being devoted to the outer case. Glass mirrors were not common till a some- what later period. As the general material of furniture in the sixteenth century continued to be wood, its chief decoration was sculpture. The nurnb^i^of remark- able pieces of carved wood furniture be- longing to this perlodVin feeunbseum is considerable. The W | strik^ p- are the chests, cassoni, large coffers for containing clothes or ornamental hangings and stuffs that were kept in them when not in use. Rooms, however large, of which the walls, floors, and ceilings are decorated, do not require many substantial objects in addi- tion ; and these chests, with a table and chairs placed against the wall, nearly com- plete the requirements of great Italian halls and corridors. The general form of the carved chests is that of a sarcophagus. They are sup- ported on claw feet, and have masks, brackets, or caryatid figures worked into the construction as in the accompanying woodcut, leaving panels, borders, or other spaces for historic sculpture. The subjects are sometimes from Scripture, FURNITURE . 70 often from the poems of Ovid. They are carved in walnut wood, which is free in grain and very tenacious : and the work, like most of the old furniture carving, is helped out with gilding. Some- times the ground, at others the relieved carvings are touched or completely covered with gilding. Most of these fine chests are in pairs, and probably formed parts of still larger sets, fours or sixes, according as they were intended for the wall spaces of larger or smaller rooms or portions of wall between two doors. Carved chests commonly in use, and given to brides as part of their dowry or as presents to married couples, or simply provided as the most convenient objects both for receptacles and occa- sionally for seats, were often made at less cost in cypress wood. They are generally decorated with surface designs etched with a pen on the absorbent grain of that wood, the ground being slightly cut out and worked over with punches shaped like nail heads, stars, &c. Cypress chests were especially used for keeping dresses or tapestries ; the aromatic properties of that timber being considered as a specific against moth. This kind of chest, when intended to hold a bridal trousseau, was occasionally made with small drawers and receptacles inside for fans, lace, combs, or other feminine ornaments. Allusions to cypress chests in England are numerous in the wardrobe and privy purse accounts of Edward the fourth and his successors. The tables of this period are sometimes solid (as n°- 162, which is covered with spirited designs of mythological subjects). Dinner tables were “boards” fastened on trestles, according to the old usage already alluded to, and could be removed when the meal was over; or several could be laid together, as in our modern dining-room tables, to meet the demands of the noble hospi- tality exercised in those days. The Italian chairs of the quattrocento period have been spoken of above. We have, however, another very rich and effective form of chairs usual in the sixteenth century, and which were in general use in Venice. In these the seat is fastened into two FURNITURE. 7 1 planks, one before and one behind, as in the woodcut. The planks are richly carved, and a third plank is let in to form a back. The several portions, par- ticularly the back, were some- times sufficiently thick to admit of carving in massive relief. The flanks of the back piece are usu- ally grotesque monsters, and the arms of the owner carved on a scutcheon in the centre. They seem to have been generally richly gilt. They also formed the decoration of a great corridor or hall, and were used without cushions. The frames of pictures were bold and rich. Those of the previous century had been mostly imitative of small Gothic shrines, being generally for reli- gious subjects and for use in churches or oratories. In the cinquecento period they were square panels, carved and richly gilt. There are in the Kensing- ton museum remarkable examples of frames made for mirrors, either for the sitting-rooms or saloons of the lady of the house, or for her bedroom. Three of these are type pieces of such produc- tions. N°- 7695 is a square frame carved in walnut, standing on a foot, and meant to be carried about. From the daisies in relief on the foot it may perhaps be ascribed to Marguerite of V alois, and have been used in the court of Provence. Nothing in the collection surpasses the elegance and perfection of the ornamental work on the mouldings. The mirror itself is of polished metal. Another is in a circular frame, n°- 7694, shaped like a shield, and meant to be hung up. It was probably made for a duchess of 7 2 FURNITURE , Ferrara. There are clas- sical details of architec- tonic kind on the edges of the carving, which is highly finished. The mirror itself is of metal, and the back has figures on it in relief and is solidly gilt. The third of these, n°* 7226, is larger. In design it is like a monumental mu- ral tablet, with a carved rich finish on the four sides, and the mirror furnished with a sliding cover in the form of a medallion, containing a female head of singular nobleness and beauty. In this case the material is walnut relieved by broad surfaces of inlaid wood. We may also mention the superb Sol- tykoff mirror, n°- 7648. This is an example of metal work throughout, the case, stand, and sliding cover being of iron damascened with gold and silver in every variety of that costly process. FURNITURE. 73 Some of the richest pieces of carved walnut fur- niture belonging to this period are the bellows. As these are charac- teristic of the Ita- lian style of the period in furniture of various kinds, we give woodcuts of two examples in the South Ken- sington collection. They are generally of walnut touched with gilding ; and in the form still fa- miliar to ourselves, which is as old as the classic times. Besides furni- ture carved in this way out of solid wood, there were other materials used and other methods of deco- rating household furniture. The tarsia or inlaid work has been alluded to. The 74 FURNITURE . first methods were by geometrical arrangements of small dies ; but magnificent figure designs had been executed in inlaid wood in the early period of the renaissance, and before it. Work of this kind was made in two or three woods, and much of it is in pine or cypress. The large grain is used to express lines of drapery and other movements by putting whole folds or portions of a dress or figure with the grain in one direction or another, as may be required. The picture is thus composed of pieces inclined together ; a few bold lines incised and blackened give such out- lines of the form as are not attainable by the other method, and slight burning with an iron is sometimes added to produce tone or shadow. “ ‘ Tarsie’ or ‘ Tarsiatura/ ” says Mrs. Merrifield, “was a kind of mosaic in woods. This consisted in representing houses and perspective views of buildings, by inlaying pieces of wood of various colours and shades into panels of walnut wood. Vasari speaks rather slightingly of this art, and says that it was practised chiefly by those persons who possessed more patience than skill in design ; that although he had seen some good representations in figures, fruits, and animals, yet the work soon becomes dark, and was always in danger of perishing from the worms and by fire. Tarsia work was frequently employed in decorating the choirs of churches as well as the backs of seats and the wainscoting. It was also used in the panels of doors.” Another method of ornamentation dependent on material that came into use in this century was the Pietra Dura or mosaic panelling of hard pebbles. The work is laborious and costly. Not only are the materials (agate, carnelian, amethyst and marbles of all colours) expensive, but each part must be ground laboriously to an exact shape and the whole mosaic fitted together, a kind of refinement of the old marble work called Alexandrinum. Besides being formed into marble panels for table tops and cabinet fronts, pietra dura was let into wood, and helped out with gay colours the more sombre walnut or ebony base of the furniture. FURNITURE. 75 Vasari, speaking of particular pieces of furniture of his day, mentions a “ splendid library table ” made at the expense and by the order of Francesco de’ Medici in Florence. This table was “ constructed of ebony,” that is, veneered with ebony, “ divided into compartments by columns of heliotrope, oriental jasper, and lapis lazuli, which have the bases and capitals of chased silver. The work is furthermore enriched with jewels,* beautiful orna- ments ot silver, and exquisite little figures, interspersed with miniatures and terminal figures of silver and gold, in full relief, united in pairs. There are, besides, other compartments formed of jasper, agates, heliotropes, sardonyxes, carnelians, and other precious stones.” This piece was the work of Bernardo Buonta- lenti. Another piece of such work is described as a table “ wholly formed of oriental alabaster, intermingled with great pieces of carnelian, jasper, heliotrope, lapis, and agate, with other stones and jewels, worth twenty thousand crowns.” Another artist, Bernardino di Porfirio of Leccio, executed an “ octangular table of ebony and ivory inlaid with jaspers.” This precious manufacture has been patronised in the grand ducal factories down to recent times, and is continued in the i;oyal establishments of the king of Italy. A feature which was strongly developed in the sixteenth century furniture is the architectural character of the outlines. It has already been observed that in the fifteenth century, chests, screens, stall fronts, doors and panelling followed or fell into the prevailing arrangements of architectural design in stonework, such as window tracery, or wall tracery. But in the cinquecento furniture an architectural character, not proper to woodwork for any constructive reasons, was imparted to cabinets, chests, &c. They were artificially provided with parts that imitated the lines, brackets, and all the details of classic entablatures which have constructive reasons in architecture, but which, reduced to the proportions of furniture, have not the same propriety. These subdivisions brought into use the art of “joinery.” The parts obviously necessary for the purpose of framing up wood, whether 6 FURNITURE. box or chest, a door, a piece fell into modifications of this ideal. ot panelling, or a chair, offer certain opportunities for mouldings or carvings ; some are the thicker portions forming the frames, some the thin flat boards that fill up the spaces. To add a variety of mouldings, such as subdivide the roofs of temples or their peristyles, is, of course, to depart from the carpenter’s province and work, and rather to take furniture out of its obvious forms for the ex- press purpose of impressing on it the renaissance type. The artists of that time did this with the object of designing “ in character,” and special models, such as the old triumphal arches, and sarcophagi, at Rome, were in view in these de- signs. On both arches and tombs sculptured bas-reliefs abounded. Figures reclined over the arches, and were arranged in square com- positions in the panels, for which the upper stories of the arches made provision. The renaissance cabinets A century later they grew FURNITURE. 77 into house fronts, and showed doors, arches, and balustrades inside, with imitative paved floors, looking-glasses set at angles of 45 0 , so as to make reflections of these various parts ; and in this humorous fashion the inside of a walnut or ebony cabinet was turned into the model of an Italian villa. Again, in place of the running foliated borders and mouldings having a continuous design, or of compositions of foliage, animals, &c., forming in each arch moulding or cornice line a homogeneous line or circle, the renaissance arabesques introduced an entirely new method of decoration. In arabesque ornament all sorts of natural objects are grafted on a central stalk, or, as in the best work, on something like the stem of a candelabrum. The resources of this method are limited only by the fancy and skill of the artist, who grafts here a mask, there a leaf on his stem, and so on. The temptation is the license and discordance that come in when no unity is needed in a piece of ornament, and no continuous effort of mind required to think out and execute one definite idea in designing it. The central stem leads to an exact balance or reversal of one half of each element in the ornament, so that one half only of a panel or border has to be designed. In the hands of great artists this kind of orna- mentation has been used with consummate grace. CHAPTER VIII. THE RENAISSANCE IN ENGLAND, FLANDERS, FRANCE, GERMANY, AND SPAIN. In the foregoing sketch of the furniture, designs, and manu- factures of central Italy, we have described the history of con- temporaneous furniture throughout Europe. Pope Leo the tenth gave every encouragement to the reviving arts in Rome, and left that capital the great nursery of art down to our day. To Italy the great princes of Europe sent the most promising artists of their dominions, or encouraged such resort. Most of these men were architects and sculptors. Classical learning and splendid living were both encouraged by Henry the eighth. He is, probably, to be credited with the impulse given to the court and the country in the direction of the arts and accomplishments of Italy. If Jean de Mabuse had been patronised by Henry the seventh, his successor offered tempting terms to Primaticcio to exchange the service of his brother king, Francis, for his own. Other artists, contemporaries of Raphael and his scholars, found their way to England ; to these we must add the great master of the German or Swiss school, Holbein. That the artists both of Holbein’s and of the Italian schools designed furniture in this country we have proofs in the drawing for a panelled chimney-piece now in the British museum, and the woodwork of King’s college chapel in Cambridge. Another piece of furniture of this date, showing the mixed character of Italian and Holbeinesque* design, is the very fine “ Tudor” cabinet at South Kensington. FURNITURE . 79 Though the court of Henry and the palaces of his wives were furnished with splendour, and works of art, especially those of the gold and silversmith, and jewellery, found their way from foreign parts to such great houses, the general manners of the country changed less in these respects than was the case in France and the more wealthy states and courts of Germany. In the portrait pictures of Henry and his family we see furniture of a renaissance character, but in the great monuments of the wood- work of the day the old style prevailed throughout the reign. The roofs, magnificent specimens of wood construction, were still subdivided, and supported by king posts, queen posts, hammer beams, arches connecting these portions and tracery panels in the spandrels, as in the two previous centuries. All parts were carved and coloured. The architecture ot country houses began to change from the old form of a castle or a fortress to that of the beautiful and characteristip styfe td'^vyhich we give the name of Tudor. Moats were retained, jbut /Still the principal features of the building were the depressed archqs and perpendicular window mullions that had been long^familiar in England, and were sug- gested by the wooden houses so general in the thirteenth, four- teenth, and fifteenth centuries. The woodwork also and the panelling of halls and chambers retained the upright lines and mouldings forming the various “ linen ” patterns. Leafwork and heads, busts of the reigning princes, or of heroes such as the Caesars, filled up the more ornamental sections, giving a certain classical element which was not fully developed till later : and most of the renaissance ornamentation of this reign has a Flemish rather than an Italian character. The woodcuts on the next page show a series of panels of different countries, many of which are to be found introduced with slight variations in English work of about the same period. Flanders was in .advance of this country in renaissance art. This remark extends to ornament of all kinds, whether of church woodwork, glass-painting, or domestic furniture. Still the Flemish 8o FURNITURE . work of this renaissance, or (speaking of England) this early Tudor period retains a mixture of details of the pointed style that English, 15th century. Flemish, 16th century. Italian, 16th century. makes us sometimes doubtful how to characterise the style of individual pieces. We may point to sideboards and chests in illus- tration. Belgium abounds in examples of this transition period. FURNITURE. 8 1 In France, the most advanced and most luxurious and culti- vated of the transalpine courts, the renaissance art had advanced far beyond that of England. Not only had Francis the first and the Medici princesses invited famous artists out of Italy, but they aimed at imitating Florentine luxuries and refinements as com- pletely as they could. Admirable schools of ornamental art, such as that of the Limoges enamellers and carvers in ivory, were and had been long established in France. Classic sculpture was produced of great merit in all materials. Primaticcio and Cellini founded new schools of architects, painters, and sculptors in France. They employed pupU^ahdT'tbe N most promising found their way to Rome and Florence^ associ^tecl themselves with the great masters then practising] ^nd brought pack all the instruc- tion they could obtain. Jean Goujon stands at the head of these French masters. Besides being a sculptor and architect, there is little doubt of his having designed and even sculptured wood furniture. Probably the carved woodwork of the king’s bedroom and adjoining rooms in the old Louvre are by his hand. Bachelier, of Toulouse, did the same, and pieces are attributed to him now in the Kensington museum. Philibert de L’Orme was another artist in a similar G FURNITURE . field. Both Goujon and Bachelier showed the influence of the great Italian masters in their work. The table engraved (p. 81) is a very elegant example of French sixteenth century furniture. The woodwork in the renaissance houses — the panelling and fittings of the rooms — was designed by the architect, and was full of quaint, sometimes extra- vagant imagery. For ex- ample, the architectural and decorative plates of Jacques Androuet du Cerceau will give some idea of the dependence of all these details on the architects of the day. This author published designs for marquetry or wood mosaics, as well as for all sorts of woodwork. A glance at the heavy cabinets of the later six- teenth century, of French origin, will show how completely great pieces of furniture fell into the same character of forms. Shelves are supported on grotesque figures, while in the mouldings, instead of simple running lines worked with the plane, as in fifteenth century woodwork, we see the egg and tongue, acanthus leaves, dentils and other members of classical architecture, constantly recurring. The ornaments of French woodworkers show a fondness for conventional bands or straps FURNITURE. 83 interspersed with figures and other ornaments. The panel, of which we give a woodcut, is French, and dated 1577. It contains armorial bearings and a monogram, said to be of the Aldine family. In 1577, however, Aldus Manutius the elder was dead, and his son did not live in France. Germany and Spain took up the renaissance art in a still more Italian spirit than England or France. Parts of Italy as well as Spain were under the same ruler; they both, as far as regards art, felt the influence of powerful imperial patronage. We are only concerned with their art here as it refers to woodwork. German wood carvers were more quaint, minute, and redundant as to decoration. Something of the vigour, manliness, and inex- haustible sense of humour of the Germans characterises their woodwork, as it does other art, of which ornament forms the main feature. The well-known “ Triumph of Maximilian,” though a woodcut only, may be taken as a type of German treatment. The great cities of the empire are full of carved woodwork, house fronts, and gables. Timber was abundant. The imagery of the period, in wood as in stone, is intentionally quaint, contorted, humorous. It would be essentially ugly but for the inexhaustible fecundity of thought, allegory, and satire that pervades it. It should be added also that designers and archi- tects had an immense sense of dignity, which we recognise imme^ diately when we see their architectural compositions as a whole. Depths and hollows, points of light, prominences and relative retirement of parts in their arrangements of carved ornament, were matters thoroughly understood ; and they succeed in im- parting that general agreeableness which we call effect ” to the mind of the observers. As regards Spanish art we cannot do better than adopt the statements of Senor J. F. Riano, who says that “ the brilliant epoch of sculpture in wood belongs to the sixteenth century, and was due to the great impulse it received from the works of Berruguete and Felipe de Borgona. He was the chief promoter g 2 8 4 FURNITURE. of the Italian style, and the choir of the cathedral of Toledo, where he worked so much, is the finest specimen of the kind in Spain. Toledo, Seville, and Valladolid were at that time great productive and artistic centres. As a specimen of wood carving of the Italian renaissance period, applied to an object of furni- ture, the magnificent wardrobe by Gregorio Pardo (1549) outside the chapter house at Toledo may be mentioned as one of the most beautiful things of its kind. These various styles of orna- mentation were applied to the cabinets ‘ Bufetes ’ of such varied form and materials which were so much the fashion in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The most characteristic of Spain are such as are called 4 Varguenos.’ These cabinets are decorated outside with fine ironwork, and inside with columns of bone painted and gilt. The other cabinets or escritoires belong- ing to that period, which are so frequently met with in Spain, were to a large extent imported from Germany and Italy, while others were made in Spain in imitation of these ” (the italics are ours), “ and as the copies were very similar it is difficult to classify them. It may be asserted, however, that cabinets of inlaid wood were made in great perfection in Spain at the end of the sixteenth century, for in a memorial written by a maker of tapestry, Pedro Gretierez, who worked for queen Isabella, he says r 4 The escritoires and cabinets brought from Germany are worth 500, 600, and 700 reales each,, and those of the same kind made in Spain by Spaniards are to be had for 250 and 300 reales.’ Besides these inlaid cabinets others must have been made in the sixteenth century inlaid with silver. An edict was issued in 1594 prohibit- ing, with the utmost rigour, the making and selling of this kind ot merchandise, in order not to increase the scarcity of silver. The edict says that ‘ no cabinets, desks, coffers, brasiers, shoes, tables, or other articles decorated with stamped, raised, carved, or plain silver, should be manufactured.’ ” CHAPTER IX. TUDOR AND STUART STYLES. The list of reigns supplies more convenient dates than the begin- ning or the end of a century for marking changes of national tastes in such matters as furniture. The names of kings or queens are justly given to denote styles, whether of architecture, dress, or personal ornaments, and utensils of the household. Society in most countries adopts those habits that are first taken up by the sovereign. In England, the reign of Elizabeth was pre-eminently a period during which the tastes, even the fancies, of the queen were followed enthusiastically by her people. Elizabethan is the name of the style of architecture gradually developed during her reign. Italian taste, though not perhaps so pure as it had been a few years earlier, had become far more general ; classical details, however, were mixed even more in England than in other countries (Flanders excepted) with relics of older styles, the love of which was still strong in this country. The fireplaces and the panelling of our old houses^ Crewe hall, Speke in Lancashire, Haddon hall in Derbyshire^ Kenilworth castle, Raglan castle, and many other old buildings, are thoroughly characteristic of this mixed classical revival. The fashion is quaint and grotesque, the figure sculpture being good enough to look well in the form of caryatid monsters, half men, half terminal posts or acanthus foliations, but not sufficiently correct or graceful to stand altogether alone. Specimens, however, of very good work can be pointed out, and we give here some of the details of a panelled 86 FURNITURE . room brought lately from Exeter, and now in the South Kensing- ton collection. We may say that the character of the woodwork throughout this period consists in actual architectural fagades or portions of fagades, showy arrangements wherever they are possible of the “ five orders” of architecture, or of pedimental fronts. Doorways and chimney fronts are the principal opportunities in interiors for the exercise of this composing skill. Panelling remained in use in the great halls and most of the chambers of the house, but the linen pattern, so graceful and effective, went out of fashion. The angles of the rooms, the cornices, and spaces above the doors were fitted with groups of architectural cornice mouldings, con- sisting of dentil, egg and tongue, and running moulds, and sometimes room walls were divided into panels by regular columns. Heraldry, with rich carved mantlings and quaint forms of scutcheons (the edges notched and rolled about as if made of the notched edges of a scroll of parchment), was a frequent ornament. Grotesque terminal figures, human -headed, supported the front of the dresser — the chief furniture of the dining-room and of the cabinet. Table supports and newels of stair rails grew into heavy acorn-shaped balusters. In the case of stair balusters, these were often ornamented with well-cut sculpture of fanciful and heraldic figures. Inlaid work also began to be used in room-panelling as FURNITURE. 8 ? well as furniture; bed heads and testers, chest fronts, cabinets, &c., were inlaid, but scarcely with delicacy, during the early Eliza- bethan period. The art was developed during the reign of James, when, in point of fact, the larger number of the Tudor houses were erected. When the Tudor period was succeeded by that of the Stuarts the same general characteristics remained, but all the forms of carving grew heavier and the execution coarser. The table legs, baluster newels, and cabinet supports, had enormous acorn-shaped masses in the middle. The objects themselves, such as the great hall tables, instead of being moveable on trestles, became of unwieldy size and weight. The general character of Flemish work was much of the same kind and form. It is not easy to distinguish the nationality of pieces of Flemish and English oak furniture of this period. The Flemings, however, retained a higher school of figure carvers, and their church-stall work and some of their best things are of a higher stamp and better designed ; and where figure sculpture was employed this superiority is always apparent. A good example of Flemish panelling can be studied in the doorway at South Kensington, n°- 4329. Their furniture is represented by an excellent specimen, amongst others, of this mixed period in the cabinet, n°- 156. Though large and heavy, and divided into massive parts, the treatment of ornament is well understood on such pieces. The scroll-work is bold but light, and the general surface of important mouldings or dividing members is not cut up by the ornamentation. The panels are very generally carved with graceful figure subjects, commonly biblical. As the years advanced into the seventeenth century Flemish work became bigger and less refined. Diamond-shaped panels were superimposed on the square, turned work was split and laid on, drop ornaments were added below tables and from the centres of the arches of arched panels ; all these unnecessary ornaments were mere additions and encumbrances to the general structure. C.MATEAUX.JC FURNITURE. 89 Our own later Jacobean or Stuart style borrowed this from the Flemish. The Flemings and the Dutch had long imported wood- work into England, and it is to that commerce that we may trace the greater likeness between the late Flemish renaissance carving and corresponding English woodwork, than between the English and the French. Dutch designs in furniture, though allied to the Flemish, were swelled out into enormous proportions. The huge wardrobe cabinets made by the Dutch of walnut wood with ebony inlaid work and waved ebony mouldings are still to be met with. The panels of the fronts are broken up into numerous angles and points. In France the fine architectural wood construction of the style of Philibert de l’Orme and so many great masters maintained itself, and a number of fine cabinets and sideboards in various collections attest the excellence of the work. The cabinet on the opposite page (n°- 2573 in the Kensington museum) is of late French sixteenth century work, and confines the characteristics of the heavy furniture madfc ifiT-hemorth of Europe with a propriety of treatment in the ornamentation of mouldings and cornices peculiar to French architects, who continued to design such structures for the houses they built and fitted up. The descen- dants of Catherine de’ Medicis and their generation were trained by Italian artists and altogether in Italian tastes, and no great change occurred in France in woodwork or furniture till the six- teenth century had closed. In German and in Italian furniture the principal changes were in the direction of veneered and marquetry work. The same vigorous quaintness continued to distinguish German decorative detail as has been already noticed. The Italians carved wood during the later sixteenth and the whole of the seventeenth centuries with extraordinary grace and vigour. The next woodcut, a pedestal in oak, shows their power in hard material : and smaller objects, such as the frames of pic- tures, were cut out in great sweeping leaves, perhaps of the go FURNITURE. acanthus, showing an ease and certainty in the artist that look as it he were employed upon some substance more yielding than the softest wood. Chairs were cut in the same rich style, and this luxurious carving was not unfrequently applied to the decoration r.. SWALLOW of state carriages. Venice maintained a pre-eminence in this perhaps in a greater degree than Florence, though in the valley of the Arno the willow, lime, sycamore, and other soft white woods were to be had in abundance, and invited great freedom in carving. FURNITURE. 91 We may now treat of an important epoch in the history of modern furniture. Venice was the seat of the manufacture of glass. In the sixteenth century workmen had received state pro- tection for the manufacture of mirrors, which till that time had been mere hand mirrors and made of mixed metals highly polished. Gilt wood frames were extensively manufactured for these Venetian looking-glasses, which found their way all over Q2 FURNITURE. Europe. Besides gilt frames, gilt chairs, carved consoles, and other highly ornate furniture were introduced as the century went on, and most of this took its origin from Venice. The woodcut represents a small frame, n°- 1605, at South Kensington. Another remarkable class of gilt woodwork, for which Florence and other cities had found trained carvers, was the framework of carriages. In England, France, Germany, and Italy carriages during the seventeenth century were stately, and certainly won- derful pieces of furniture. Examples of these showy carriages exist still. There is a collection belonging to the royal family of Portugal, now preserved at Lisbon, one or two in the museum of the hotel de Cluny at Paris, dating from the time of Martin and painted by him, and there are a few carriages of old date at Vienna and probably in some private houses. The state-coach of the Speaker is an English example of the seventeenth century. Germany differed less from Italy even than France in wood carving, interior room fittings, and the frequent pedimental com- positions containing grotesques, or heraldic achievements on a scale of sumptuous display. The German princes were many of them skilful and intelligent patrons of art, and made collections in their residences. A well-known piece belonging to the early seventeenth century is preserved in the royal museum at Berlin. This is known as the Pomeranian art cabinet. It is 4 ft. 10 in. high, 3 ft. 4 in. wide by 2 ft. 10 in. deep, made of ebony with drawers of sandal wood lined with red morocco leather, and is mounted with silver and pietra dura work, and fitted inside with utensils of various kinds. The chair, of which we give a woodcut, is German of about the same date. In the west of Europe, during the seventeenth century, mar- quetry was extensively used, and became the leading feature of furniture decoration. Inlaying had long been in use ; but the new marquetry was a picturesque composition, a more complete attempt at pictorial representation. It comes before us in old furniture under various forms, and many examples of it may be FURNITURE. 93 studied in different collections. In this country we may consider it mainly as an imported art of the reign of William and Mary, when Dutch marquetry furniture became the fashion in the form of bandy-legged chairs, upright clock fronts, secretaires or bureaux, or writing cabinets which were closed in the upper and middle parts with doors, and other pieces that offered surfaces available 94 FURNITURE. for such decoration. The older designs on work of this kind represent tulips and other flowers, foliage, birds, &c., all in gay colours, generally the self colours of the woods used. Sometimes the eyes and other salient points are in ivory or mother-of-pearl. In France, in the earlier marquetry designs, picturesque land- scapes, broken architecture, and figures are represented. Colours are occasionally stained on the wood. Ivory and ebony were favourite materials ; as also in Germany and in Italy. It is to be noted that as the vigour of the great sixteenth century movement died out, the mania for making furniture in the form of architectural models died out also ; nor do we find it becoming a fashion again till quite modern times, under the Gothic and other revivals at the end of the last and the beginning of the present century. The architectural idea was in itself full of grandeur, and it was productive of very beautiful examples in the sarcophagus-shaped chests or cassoni, and in cabinet work, though the facades of temples and the vaults and columns of triumphal arches in Rome do not bear to be too completely reduced to such small proportions. With the introduction of marquetry into more general use we recognise not only a new or renewed method of decoration, but a changed ideal of con- struction. Boxes, chests, tables, cabinets, &c., were conceived as such. They were made more convenient for use, and were no longer subdivided by architectural mouldings and columns, all so much extra work added to the sides and fronts. About the middle of the seventeenth century a kind of work altogether new in the manufactory of modern furniture made its appearance under the reign of Louis the fourteenth of France. That king rose to a position in Europe that no monarch of modern times had occupied before, and the great ministers of his reign had the wisdom to take special measures for the estab- lishment of the various arts and manufactures in which either the Italians or Flemings excelled the French as well as other nations. Colbert, his minister of finance, amongst his commercial reforms FURNITURE. 95 of learned societies and schools of art, founded in 1664 an “ Academie royale de peinture d’architecture et de sculpture.” It was into this that the designers of architecture, woodwork, ornament or furniture, were admitted. He established also the famous factory of the “ Gobelins ” for making pictorial tapestry. The place took its name from the brothers Gobelin, Flemings, who had a dyeing-house in the Rue Mouffetard. Lebrun, the painter, was the first head of it. Another important name is that of Jean Lepautre. He has left numerous designs of ornament behind him for panelling, mirror frames, carriages, &c. Lepautre was a pupil of Adam Philippon. This artist, whose chief calling was that of a joiner and cabinet maker, has also left designs. To Colbert is due the credit of pushing forward the renewal or completion of the royal palaces ; especially the chateau of Versailles. For the furniture of this palace we find the new material employed, namely, boule marquetry, which owes its name to the maker. The orthography of proper names was still often unsettled at that time, and we find the name variously spelt. The correct way seems to have been Boulle ; but we shall retain the more usual mode, both for the artist and for his work. Andre Charles Boule was born in 164?, and made the peculiar kind of veneered work composed of tortoiseshell and thin brass, to which are sometimes added ivory and enamelled metal ; brass and shell, however, are the general materials. Boule was made head of the royal furniture department and was lodged in the Louvre. A very interesting early specimen of this work is now at Windsor castle, and other early pieces belong to Sir Richard Wallace. The date attributed to the first makes it doubtful whether Boule may not have seen the same sort of work practised in other workshops. This kind of marquetry has, however, been assigned by general consent to Boule. In the earlier work of Boule the inlay was produced at great cost, owing to the waste of valuable material in cutting ; and the shell is left of its natural colour ; in later work the manufacture 96 FURNITURE . was more economical. Two or three thicknesses of the different material were glued or stuck together and sawn through at one operation. An equal number of figures and of matrices or hollow pieces exactly corresponding were thus produced, and by counter- charging two or more designs were obtained by the same sawing. These are technically known as “ boule and counter,” the brass forming the groundwork and the pattern alternately. In the later or “ new boule,” the shell is laid on a gilt ground or on vermilion. The brass is elaborately chased with a graver. Besides these plates of brass for marquetry ornaments, Boule, who was a sculptor of no mean pretensions, founded and chased up feet, edgings, bracket supports, &c., to his work in relief, or in the round, also in brass. The original use of these parts was to protect the edges and angles, and bind the thin inlaid work together where it was interrupted by angles in the structure. Afterwards brass mounts, more or less relieved, were added to enrich the flat designs of the surfaces. Classical altars, engraved or chased as mere surface decoration, would receive the addition of claw feet actually relieved. Figures standing on such altars, pedestals, &c., were made in relief more or less bold. In this way Boule’s later work is not only a brilliant and rich piece of surface decoration, but its metallic parts are repousse or embossed with thicknesses of metal ornament. In boule work all parts of the marquetry are held down by glue to the bed, usually of oak. The metal is occasionally fastened down by small brass pins or nails, which are hammered flat and chased over so as to be im- perceptible. In England, during the reign of Charles the second and of James, French furniture was imported ; the old Tudor oak lingered in country houses. Boule hardly found its way till the following century to England. Splendid silver furniture consisting of plates embossed and repousse, heightened with the graver and of admirable design, was occasionally made for Ihe Court and for great families. Wood carving, in the manner of the school ot FURNITURE . 97 Sir Christopher Wren, as in the bracket here shown, was long continued in connexion with architecture and furniture. Another style was carried to the highest pitch of technical execu- tion and finish, as well as of truth of natural forms in the carving of Grinling Gibbons. This artist was English, but partially of Dutch descent. He carved foliage, birds, flowers, busts and figures, pieces of drapery, &c., with astonishing dexterity. We find his work principally on mirror frames, wall panels, chimney pieces, &c. Specimens may be seen over the communion table of St. James’s church, Westminster, and in the choir of St. Paul’s cathedral. The finest examples known are probably the carved work at Petworth house in Sussex, and at Chatsworth. His material is generally lime and other white woods. The flowers and foliage of his groups or garlands sweep round in bold and harmonious curves, making an agreeable whole, though for archi- tectural decorative carving no work was ever so free from con- ventional arrangements. His animals or his flowers appear to be H so many separate creations from nature, laid or tied together separ- ately, though in reality formed out of a block, and remaining still portions of a group cut in the solid wood. Gibbons died in 1721. Wal- pole mentions Watson as having been his pupil and assistant at Chatsworth. Drevot of Brussels and Laurens of Mechlin were other pupils : the former did not survive him. His school had many followers, for we find the acanthus carvings on mouldings, round doorways and chimney pieces, down to the middle of the eighteenth century, executed in England with a masterly hand. Specimens of such work have been recently acquired in the Kensington museum, the fruits of the demolition of old London, continually in progress. The border of this page represents one of these admirable pieces ; a door and frame from a house in FURNITURE . 99 Lincoln’s-inn . Nothing can surpass the perfect mastery of execu- tion. All the work is cut clean and sharp out of wood which admits of no tentative cuts, and requires no rubbing down with sand paper, and in which errors are not to be repaired. Lengths of these mouldings were worked off by hand, evidently without hesitation and without mishap. Country houses abound with this fine though unpretending work, and give ample evidence of the existence of a school of fine workmen, carvers at the com- mand of the architects of the day. We may here revert to an important addition to room fur- niture, which became European during this century. Mirrors had been made from the earliest times in polished metal, but were first made of glass at Venice. In 1507 Andrea and Dominico, two glass workers of Murano, declared before the Council of ten that they had found a method of making “ good and perfect mirrors of crystal gl^ssdLA monopoly of the right of manufacture was granted^ to the twa inventors for twenty years. In 1564, the mirrof ^&Jk©FS ’ became a distinct guild of glass workers. The plates wterg^ not ^Isrfge : from four to five feet are the largest dimensions met with till late in the eighteenth century. They were commonly bevilled on the edges. The frames in soft wood (as in the woodcut, p. 100) are specimens of free carving during the seventeenth century. Both in Venice and in Florence soft woods, such as willow or lime, were used. The mirror-plates were, at first, square or oblong. Towards the end of the century we find them shaped at the top. In the eighteenth century they were generally shaped at the top and bottom. Figures were sunk in the style of intaglio or gem cutting on the back of the glass and left with a dead surface, the silver surface of the mercury showing through as the mirror is seen from the front. The looking-glasses made in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries by colonies of Venetian workmen in England and France had the plates finished by an edge gently bevilled of an h 2 100 FURNITURE . inch in width, following the form of the frame, whether square or shaped in curves. This gives preciousness and prismatic light to the whole glass. * It is of great difficulty in execution, the plate being held by the workman over his head and the edge cut by grinding. The feats of skill of this kind in the form of interrupted curves and short lines and angles are rarely accomplished by modern workmen, and the angle of the bevil itself is generally too acute, whereby the prismatic light produced by this portion of the mirror is in violent and too showy contrast to the remainder. In England, looking-glasses came into general use soon after the Restoration. “ Sir Samuel Morland built a fine room at Vauxhall FURNITURE. ioi in 1667, the inside all of looking-glass, and fountains, very pleasant to behold. It stands in the middle of the garden covered with Cornish slate, on the point whereof he placed a Punchinello.” At about the same period the house of Nell Gwynne, “ the first good one as we enter St. James’ Square from Pall Mall, had the back room on the ground floor entirely lined with looking-glass within memory,” writes Pennant, “ as was said to have been the ceiling.” “ La rue St. Andre-des-arts,” says Savarin, speaking of Paris in the seventeenth century, “ eut le premier cafe orne de glaces et de tables de marbre it peu pres comme on les voit de nos jours.” 102 FURNITURE . During the seventeenth century, tapestry, the material in use for hanging and decorating the walls of splendid rooms in France, was made also in this country. Factories were set up at Mortlake, where several copies were made of the Raphael tapestries, the cartoons of which were in this country ; and in Soho fields. Sometimes tapestry was hung on bare walls ; occa- sionally it was strained over the older panelled work of the days of the Tudor and Stuart sovereigns, the fruitful period of country house architecture in England. With a woodcut (on preceding page) of a bedroom holy-water vessel we finish the account of this period. An English table and chairs of the year 1633, from a woodcut of that date. CHAPTER X. FURNITURE OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY. As the eighteenth century draws on, we arrive at furniture of which examples are more readily to be met with, and we are reminded of houses and rooms more or less unaltered which have come under general observation. The fashions were led in France. Boule work grew into bigger and more imposing structures as the manufacture passed into the hands of a greater number of workmen. Commodes or large presses were made with edgings and mounts, in the form of “ egg and tongue ” and other classic or renaissance mouldings. The tops were formed into one or three pedestals, to hold clocks and candelabra. Other changes were introduced to carry out the taste for gilding which then prevailed, and the broken shell- shaped woodwork, popularly known as Louis quinze work, began to be adopted for the frames of large glasses and the mouldings of room panels. The panels grew tall, were arched or shaped at the top, and occupied the wall space from the dado to the moulded and painted ceilings, in narrow panels. The fantastic forms of curve, emblems of the affected manners of the day, called Rococo from the words rocaille coquille , rock and shell curves, were well calculated to show off the lustre of gilding. The gold was admirably laid on, thick and very pure, and both in bronze gilding and in the woodwork maintains its lustre to the present time. The severe classical grandeur of the old roll mouldings of fireplace jambs, wall and door panels, of the former reign gave way everywhere to this lighter work. 104 FURNITURE . Much early eighteenth century furniture was bombe, or rolled about in curious curves or undulations of surface, partly to display the skill of the cabinet-makers, and partly to show off the marquetry, which formed its only decoration. Another step was the introduction of mechanical applications and contrivances. The tops of tables lift off, and the action causes other portions to rise, to open, and so on. It is to be remembered that bedrooms were often used as boudoirs or studies, and that furniture which could shut private papers up without requiring that they should be put away into drawers was convenient in such rooms. As the century advanced, it became customary to form a sort of alcove at the end of bedrooms in France. The centre portion contained the bed, hidden by curtains, the spaces between it and the two walls were shut in with doors, and formed dressing closets, which could be used while the rest of the room was shut off. The bed- room then became a reception room and was thrown open with other receiving rooms of the house. Bureaux or mechanically shutting tables, writing desks, and the like, under this arrange- ment were a necessity for small rooms. A school of painters arose in the reign of Louis the fifteenth who devoted themselves to the decoration of room woodwork and ceilings ; Charles Delafosse, Antoine Coypel, Jean Restout, and many pupils. We must associate the names of these artists with those of the Le Pautre family. Jean died before the end of the seventeenth century, but Pierre took part in the later works of the Louvre and of Versailles under Jules Hardouin Mansard, “ surin- tendant des bastiments.” Juste Aurele Meissonnier did still more to make this showy work popular. He designed all sorts of room furniture and woodwork. It is amongst the published works of these artists that we must seek the eighteenth century designs of French fashion. Painted panels were inserted into the wood ceilings, over the tops of looking-glasses, and dessus-fiortes or the short panels between the tops of doors and the line of cornice. These are generally in chiaro scuro, or light and shade FURNITURE . I0 5 only, and represent families of cupids. Nymphs and fauns, shepherdesses, and the supposed inhabitants of a fanciful Arcadia, formed the general subjects of room decorations. A process belonging to the same reign should be noticed, called after the inventor, Vernis-Martin, a carriage painter, born about the year 1706. By carriage painter we must understand a painter of heraldic ornaments, flower borders, &c. His varnish is a fine transparent lac polish, probably derived from Japan through missionaries, who had resided there before the occurrence of the great massacres which closed Japan to all but the Dutch traders. The work which we commonly associate with his name is generally found on furniture such as tables or book cases, as well as on needle cases, snuff boxes, fans, and etuis, on a gold ground. The gold is waved or striated by some of those ingenious processes still in use amongst the Japanese, by which the paste or prepara- tion on which their gold is laid is worked over while still soft. One or two carriages beautifully painted in,, vernis-martin are kept in the hotel de Cluny at Paris. Although it is popularly held that Martin declared his secret should die with him, and that he kept his word, yet it is certain that he left imitators and pupils who painted and enamelled in his manner furniture of various kinds. In Sir R. Wallace’s collection there are two pieces, coloured green and varnished, one a table and the other a cabinet or book- case, of vernis-martin work. There is on these no ornament excepting the varnish and the gold mounts that are added at the edges. The most beautiful objects that bear his name are the small wares, such as fans, needle books, or snuff boxes. Later in the century we meet with other French names, Riesener, David, and Gouthiere, who gained great reputation, the two first as makers of marquetry, and the latter as a founder and chaser of metal furniture mounts, such as edgings and lock scutcheons. The history of French furniture is in general the history of that of other nations. The art of wood carving was still maintained in io6 FURNITURE . Italy and applied, as in the instance of this distaff, to utensils of all kinds. In England we had, about the middle of the century, a school of carvers, gilders, and ornamenters following the extravagant style of the French. The most promi- nent name is that of Thomas Chippendale, who worked from the middle till towards the end of the century. He was descended from a family of carvers, and in- herited the skill which had been general in his craft since the days of Gibbons. We find much rococo carving on bed testers, round fireplaces, over doors, &c., in our English houses built during the reign of Anne and the two first Georges. Other pieces of furniture, suth as carved tables, wardrobe cabinets, chair backs or dinner trays, go by Chippendale’s name. They are in mahogany, and follow the architectural moulding lines often seen in the works of Sir William Chambers and the brothers Adam. Among the room decorations of the century we may notice the shelves for holding Chinese porcelain and imitations of Chinese designs in delft pottery, a taste imported by William the third and the members of his court who had lived in Holland. The chimney pieces at Hampton court and elsewhere are provided with woodwork to hold these ornaments. Hogarth paints them in his interiors, and the rage for purchasing such objects at sales became a popular subject of ridicule. To the early eighteenth century belongs a class of furniture of which the decorations consisted of panels of old Chinese and Japanese lac work ; fitted, as the marquetry of the day was, with rich gilt metal mounts. In England it was the fashion to imitate the Japan work, and such old furniture is occasionally met with : black, with raised figure decorations of Chinese character done in gold dust. A great change is observable in the French furniture, panel FURNITURE. °7 carving and such decorations from the period of Louis the six- teenth. Several causes at the time combined to give art of this kind a new as well as a healthier direction. Amongst these we may mention the discoveries made at Herculaneum and Pompeii. It is needless to say that the peculiar cause of the destruction of both those towns had preserved in them perfect memorials, in many forms, of the social life of antiquity. Decorations, utensils and furniture of all kinds that were made of metal, and had resisted the action of damp and time, were recovered in fair condition. One result, both in France and England, was a return to a better feeling for classical style. Room decorations and furniture soon reached the highest point of elegance which French renaissance art of a sumptuous kind has touched since the sixteenth century. The panelling of rooms, usually in oak and painted white, was designed in severe lines with straight mouldings and pilasters. The pilasters were decorated with well-designed carved work, small, close, and splendidly gilt. The quills that fill the fluted columns still seen round so many interiors were cut into beads or other subdivi- sions with much care. Fine arabesque work in the style of the “ loggie ” of Raphael was partly carved in relief, partly drawn and painted, or gilt, with gold of a yellow or of a green hue; the green being largely alloyed with silver. An example of the best work of this kind may be referred to in the beautiful room brought from Paris and now preserved, reconstructed, at South Kensington. The houses built for members of the brilliant court of queen Marie Antoinette were filled with admirable work in this manner, or in the severer but still delicate carved panelling in wood plainly painted. The royal factories of the Gobelins and of Sevres turned out also their most beautiful productions to decorate rooms, furniture, and table service. In the former of these, tapes- tries were made for wall hangings, for chair backs, seats, and sofas. Rich silks from the looms of Lyons, and from those of Lucca, Genoa, and Venice were also employed for this kind of io8 FURNITURE. furniture both in France and Flanders, Germany, Italy, and Spain, as well as in our own country. In all these matters France led the fashions. During this brilliant period, from 1774 to 1790, we meet with the names of several artists employed for painting the panelling of rooms, the lunettes over chimney fronts, and the panels of ceil- ings. Fragonard, Natoire, Boucher (the director of the Academy) are among the foremost of these. Their history perhaps belongs rather to that of painters than of our present subject 3 but they are too much mixed up with eighteenth century furniture not to find mention even in a sketch like the present. Other artists such as Delafosse, Lalonde, Cauvet and Salem- bier designed arabesques, decorative woodwork, and furniture. The designs of many of them are still extant : and Cauvet dedi- cated a book of them to Monsieur, the king’s brother. Four tables with silver-gilt mounts of his design were made for the queen’s house of the Trianon, and afterwards removed to the favourite residence of the emperor Napoleon at St. Cloud. Robert and Barthelemy were sculptors and bronze workers who made mounts for furniture, and engravers. Meissonnier, Oppenord, Queverdo worked in the same way. Hubert Robert, a painter, helped Micque in all the decorations of the Trianon. Two or three cabinet-makers have transmitted a great name, though little seems to be known of their history. Of these Riesener and David Roentgen were ebenistes , or workers in fine cabinet making. The designation is taken from the ebony and other exotic woods, which had come into more general use in Europe from the end of the seventeenth century subsequently to 1695, when the Dutch settled in Ceylon. The French obtained ebony from Madagascar, but in very small quantities. After the settlements at Ceylon we find it introduced into Europe on a larger scale. There are green and yellow varieties but the black wood is the most valuable, and Ceylon is the country in which the greatest quantities are produced. We still find in English FURNITURE . 109 houses much old carved ebony furniture, mainly chairs and cabinets, dating generally from the early years of the Dutch occupation. Riesener used tulip ( Liriodendron tulip if era), rosewood, holly ( ilex aquifolium ), maple ( acer campestre ), laburnum ( cytisus Alpinus ), purple wood ( copaifera pub flora), &c. Wreaths and bunches of flowers, exquisitely worked and boldly designed, form centres of his marquetry panels which are often plain surfaces of one wood. On the sides, in borders and compartments, we find diaper patterns in three or four quiet colours. These conven- tional sides or corners of diaper work help to give point to the graceful compositions that form the principal feature in his marquetry. Chests of drawers and cabinets are sometimes met with in snake wood and other varieties of brown wood, of which the grain is waved or curled without marquetry. The name of Riesener is to be found stamped sometimes on the panel itself, sometimes on the oak liniqep df the pieces of furniture made by him. . A number of exceptional examples of Riesener’ s cabinets are described in the appendix to the detailed catalogue of furniture in the South Kensington museum. The best pieces are from the collection now belonging to Sir Richard Wallace. The most imposing of these is the rounded bureau or secretaire, made for Stanislaus, king of Poland. It is beautifully inlaid on the top, ends, and back with designs emblematic of the sciences, &c., and with bust heads. The letters S. R. are put upon a broad band of decoration that runs round the lower portion of the bureau. A similar piece of furniture with gilt bronze candle branches by Gouthiere, on the sides, is now in the Louvre. Both are signed. David Roentgen was born at Niewid near Luneville, in which latter city he worked as a contemporary of Riesener, but younger by some years in age. He also made marquetry in lighter woods and of rather a gayer tone than those of Riesener. Both of them often worked in plain mahogany, and in such cases trusted for the 10 FURNITURE. effectiveness of their pieces to the excellence of the mounts of chased and gilt metal by their contemporary, Gouthiere. In his light marquetry David used various white woods. Pear, lime, and light-coloured woods were occasionally tinted with various shades by burning. This process, originally effected by hot irons, is better and more delicately managed by hot sand. Only browns and dark ochrous yellows are obtained by this means, and the more delicately toned marquetry is without hues of green or blue. Those tints, however, can be obtained by steeping the wood in various chemical solutions. As a maker of gilt bronze furniture mounts Gouthiere had a wide reputation. He belongs to the period of Louis the sixteenth. With him Riesener and David worked in concert ; all their best pieces are finished with the mounts of Gouthiere. Among examples in this country is the cabinet in the royal collection at Windsor. No signature has been discovered on this piece, but the exquisite modelling of the flower borders, the metal mould- ings and mounts, and the crown supported by figures of cupids that surmounts the whole, leave us in no hesitation as to its authorship. Gouthiere modelled and chased up similar work for carriages, and mounts for marble chimney pieces, such as that in the boudoir just above referred to. The gilding on these mounts is so good and has been laid on so massively that the metal has in general suffered no substantial injury down to our own times, and can be restored to its original lustre by soap and water. Indeed, the fine old work dating from the two previous reigns by Andre Boule and other artists, after the designs of Berain, has suffered little. The boule clocks, with arched glass panels in front and spreading supports and figure compositions on the top, have in most cases come down to us clothed in their original water gild- ing, easily to be cleaned though looking black when they have been long left to neglect. Contemporaneous with Riesener in France was the Italian FURNITURE. 1 1 1 maker of marquetry, Maggiolino. In Florence, Venice, Milan, and Genoa, cabinets and commodes of marquetry were produced. German cabinet-makers manufactured the same work through the earlier part of the century. Bombe or curved furniture was also made by the Germans with great, we may almost say with extra- vagant, skill. To maintain mouldings on the angles of these curved and waving surfaces is a feat in workmanship of difficult attainment, and German cabinet-makers seem to have taken delight in exhibiting such skill. The quaint work of the minute carvings in box and other hard woods, admirably carried out during the times of the immediate pupils of Diirer and the school of well-trained artists who succeeded him, was no longer to be found. The desolating wars that swept over this part of Europe during the days of Louis the fourteenth and Frederick the great seem to have exhausted the country, and worn out the ancient industry of the cities. Guilds died away, the men who composed them being required for the exigencies of war, and the wealth of the inhabitants was so reduced that the leisure to enjoy and even the means to buy fine productions of art existed no longer. Few collectors have done greater service to the study of English art than Horace Walpole ; and few have had the opportunities he enjoyed a century ago, when he was able to fill Strawberry Hill with a collection of mediaeval, renaissance, and later works of art of every description. A lively passage, alluding to the contract for the roof and the glazing of King’s college chapel, Cambridge, commemorates his value for these art traditions. “As much,” he says, “ as we imagine ourselves arrived at higher perfection in the arts, it would not be easy for a master of a college to go into St. Margaret’s parish, Southwark, to bespeak such a roof as that of King’s college, and a .dozen or two of windows so admirably drawn, and order them to be sent home by such a day, as if they were bespeaking a chequered pavement.” A certain sort of revival of Gothic design took place in England I 12 FURNITURE. about this period : and later in the century feeble attempts at Gothic woodwork were made here and there ; but there was little national taste in furniture apart from a close imitation of French fashions. A still greater change was produced by Sir William Chambers, the architect of modern Somerset house, who wrote a book on civil architecture and room decorations. Another name connected with furniture has been already mentioned, that of Thomas Chippendale. He published his book of designs in 1764, containing complete sides of rooms, looking-glass frames, chimney fronts, &c. He and his contemporaries designed tables, cabinets and moveable furniture of every description, including carriages, on which, indeed, furniture designers of all periods were employed. Chippendale and his sons or assistants produced frames and cornices for gilding so different from his well-made wardrobes, &c., that there must have been more than one of the family engaged in superintending these dissimilar kinds of objects. He is a representative maker. The son has been sometimes credited with the mahogany woodwork of which delicacy and exactness are the characteristics. Satin wood came into fashion in England during the last half of the century. Both Cipriani and Angelica Kauffmann painted medallions, cameo ornaments and borders on table tops and fronts, harpsichord cases, &c., made of satin wood or coloured in the manner of the vernis-martin work. The former decorated Carlton house. Mathias Lock, with whom was associated a cabinet maker named Copeland, also published designs of furniture of every kind. A semi-classic Pompeian or Roman arabesque feeling runs through the ornamentation of these pieces of furniture. They are light in make, often elegant, and more or less follow the taste prevailing in France and Italy. Gillow, the founder of a respectable existing firm, belongs to this period; but, as yet, nothing has come to light regarding his early history or apprentice- ship. Another name connected both with furniture and decora- tive arts of all kinds was that of Robert Adam ; he was of FURNITURE . ii3 Scotch extraction and had travelled in Italy ; and his brother John built many private houses; for example, the Adelphi and Portland place. Furniture, carriages, sedan chairs,, and plate were amongst the objects for which Robert, perhaps both the brothers, gave designs. Classical capitals,* mouldings and niches, circles and lunettes, with shell flutings and light garlands, were favourite features in their fagade ornaments. The sideboards, bust terms (or pedestals), urn-shaped knife boxes; the chairs, commodes, & c., were all designed to accord with the architec- tural decorations. Polished steel fire-grates belong to this period, and we believe to the authorship of the brothers Adam. A cabinet maker named A. Heppelwhite published in 1789 a large set of designs for every sort of reception room and bed- room furniture. We see in these the mahogany chairs with pierced strapwork backs, library and pedestal tables, mechanical desks and bureaux, which continued in fashion during the early years of this century. Fanciful sashed glass doors closed in the bookcases ; interrupted pediments and pedestals provided space for busts round the tops of these cases. Fluted legs, and occa- sionally lion-headed supports, uphold the tables and chairs. Knife cases to set on the sideboard, and urn stools for the break- fast table, are among these designs. Tea chests and tea caddies indicate that tea was then coming into general use. Thomas Sheraton, another cabinet-maker, published towards the end of the century an extensive “ Dictionary ” of his trade. His designs, like those just mentioned, embrace beds, sofas, & c. Mechanical dressing and washing tables, very ingeniously contrived, were among his productions.- We meet with these still ; of Spanish mahogany, and admirable workmanship. The structure of all these pieces was light and strong. Time has had little effect on wood so well seasoned and on pieces put together in so work- manlike a manner. The French revolution put a complete stop to the old arts of domestic life in France. As in the sixteenth century, so in the 1 FURNITURE . 1 14 eighteenth the new ideas rushed extravagantly in the direction of republican antiquity and Roman taste and sentiment. It was under the empire, after the Italian wars and the Egyptian expedi- tion, that the means and taste for expenditure upon civil furniture and decorations revived, with an assumption of classicalism. The art of the time however, inspired by the hard paintings of David, is but a dry and affected attempt at a fresh renaissance. In furni- ture mounts, chairs, &c., of supposed classical designs, it is known as the art of the “ empire.” This country copied the fashion as soon as the return of peace opened the continent to English travellers. Furniture and room decorations were designed after classical ideals, and we see chairs and tables imitating bas-reliefs and the drawings on antique vases. It is probable that collectors, such as Sir William Hamilton and the members of the Dilettanti society, sensibly influenced the prevailing style. James Wyatt the architect, about the end of the last century, rebuilt or cleared out many of our mediaeval churches and houses, and took to designing what he called Gothic for room decoration and furniture. Sir Jeffrey Wyatt or Sir Jeffrey Wyattville (as he became) made great changes at Windsor castle, under George the fourth. Pugin designed some flimsy Gothic furniture for the same palace. At a later period of his life, however, he did much, both as a designer and a writer upon art, to turn attention to the principles on which mediaeval designs of all kinds were based. We are now, perhaps, returning to renaissance art in furniture, and it is certain that collections such as those lately exhibited by Sir Richard Wallace ; the Exposition Retrospective in Paris in 1865 ; the loan exhibitions of 1862 in London, and that of Gore house at an earlier period ; and above all the great permanent collection at South Kensington, must contribute to form the public taste. In the review which we have made of what may be called the household art of so many ages, it would be difficult to assign an FURNITURE . 1 1 5 absolute superiority to the artists of any one generation, consider- ing what countless beautiful objects have been made for the personal use and enjoyment of men. The sculptured thrones of ivory and gold, the seats and couches of bronze overlaid with gold and damascened with the precious metals, the inlaid chariots, tables, chests, and jewelled caskets of antiquity; the imagery, the shrines, the stalls, and roofs of the middle ages ; the wood sculpture, tarsia, pietra dura, damascening and the endless variety of objects produced during the days of Leonardo, Michel Angelo, and Raphael, down to the carving of Gibbons, and the splendid work of Boule, Riesener and Gouthiere, are all in various ways excellent. We must not venture to call one class of productions finer than another where the differences are so great and such high perfec- tion has been attained in each. Every style and fashion when at its best has resulted from the utmost application of mind and time on the part of trained artists ; and the highest art can never be cheap, neither can any machinery or any help from mechanical assistance become substitutes for art. Beauty which is created by the hand of man is not the clever application of mechanical forces or of scientific inventions, but is brought to light, whether it be a cabinet front or the Venus of Milo, often with pain, always by the entire devotion of the labour, the intellect, the experience, the imagination and the affection, of the artist and the workman. CHAPTER XI. CHANGES OF TASTE AND STYLE. It is interesting to trace the changes that the more common and necessary pieces of furniture have undergone during successive historic ages. The social life of ancient times, even of the middle ages which come so much nearer to us in point of years, differs from that of our own in its whole aspect. Yet though personal habits have so greatly altered the general wants of men remain much the same. Hence such objects as beds, chairs, tables, chests, dressers, wardrobes or cabinets, carriages or litters, have been always used and maintained a certain identity. With a summary of the changes of form and methods of decoration of a few of the principal objects of personal use we shall conclude. Bedsteads and Couches. Beds served often in antiquity and in the middle ages* and have served at all times, almost as much for sitting or reclining by day as for sleeping on at night. To what has been already said on the subject of antique beds little need be added. The Egyptian bed and the pillow or crutch, of wood or more valuable materials, have been described. Examples of the crutch are numerous in tlie British museum and in the Louvre. “ The Egyptians had couches,” says Sir G. Wilkinson, “ but they do not appear to have reclined upon them more frequently than modern Europeans, in whose houses they are equally common. The ottomans were simple square sofas with- FURNITURE. 1 *7 out backs, raised from the ground nearly to the same level as the chair. The upper part was of leather, or of cotton stuff, richly coloured, like the cushions of the fauteuils, and the box was of wood painted with various devices and ornamented with the figures of captives, who were supposed to be degraded by holding so humiliating a position. And the same idea gave them a place on the footstools of a royal throne.” The bed, Ae^o?, of the Greeks was covered with skins, over the skins with woollen blankets ; sometimes a linen cloth or sheet was added. The finest coverlids were from Miletus, Carthage, and Corinth. These varied in the softness of their woollen texture and the delicate disposition of the colours. Later Greek beds had girths of leather or string ; a mattress ; and a pillow. The Roman bed had the side by which it was entered open, the other was protected by a shelf. The mattresses were stuffed with herbs, in later times with wool Or feathers. Precious counter- panes embroidered with'gold were occasionally used. Canopies or frames for curtains, In- one form or another, have always been necessary adjuncts to beds. Testers were placed on cradles, with gauze curtains to keep off flies. Beds on wheels were in use for the sick in classical and mediaeval times : as also a low and port- able bed, grabatum , with mats for bedding. This is the word used in St. John’s gospel, translated “ take up thy bed and walk.” Besides beds, couches, and stools, used in antiquity, as in our own times, we find amongst the ancients the habit, unknown since, of reclining on the left elbow at meals. The Romans called the conventional arrangement the triclinium. The ac- companying woodcut represents the plan of a triclinium , the guest reclining on the left elbow and the faces of each directed from i to 3, 4 to 6, and so on. These numbers and positions indicated a sort of superiority, or a highest, middle, and lowest to every table. A passage from 6 5 4 7 3 8 2 9 1 1 1 8 FURNITURE. Horace, often quoted, enumerates the guests in this order. Fundanius, who was at the top, giving an account of a dinner to his friends, says : “ I sat at the top, Viscus Thurinus next to me ; Yarius, if my memory serves me, below him ; Vibidius along with Servilius Balatro, whom Maecenas brought as humble companions. Nomentanus was above, and Porcius below the host himself.” The beds of the early middle ages in England had testers with curtains, often of valuable material. These slid on rings on an iron rod. Sometimes the rod, with a frame to sustain it, was on one or on three sides of the bed, and the tester wanting. Some- times the beds were slung on uprights, as cots are at sea. No great expense was incurred in the framework till the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The splendour of state beds, or those of great people, consisted in the curtains, which were occasion- ally taken down, and hung up in churches on festivals. In the illuminations of manu- scripts and in pictures repre- senting scenes in which there is a bed, we find the tester strained by cords to the sides of the room or to the ceiling, as in the accompanying wood- cut. The curtains ran round this frame, as in our modern four-posters; but we see them hoisted out of the way during the daytime, not round a post, only raised beyond reach. The finest examples of bedsteads that can be called mediaeval are French, and only met with in fragments, or more or less complete. This is unfortunately the case also as regards early English bedsteads. We may refer the reader to the “ Mobilier Frangais ” of Viollet le Due, for an idea of the sumptuous carved FURNITURE. 1 1 9 oak bedstead of the great palaces and hotels of France. It was a frame panelled down to the ground, often containing chests, drawers, presses, or other safe places under the sleeper. The back resembled more or less the reredos of an altar, or the great panelled presses that filled the sides of sacristies. Four posts supported the canopy. A bedstead of the fifteenth century was long preserved at Leicester, and said to have been slept on by Richard the third. The under part of it formed his military chest, and the discovery of the treasure a century afterwards occasioned a barbarous murder. None of the coin found was of a later mint than his reign. It is also said by Pennant that a stump bedstead still in Berkeley castle is the same on which the murder of Edward the second was committed. Fine examples of Tudor bedsteads are preserved there. In the town of Ware in Hertfordshire is, and has long been, an inn under the sign of the Saracen’s head. “ In this,” says Clutterbuck, “ there is a bed of enormous propor- tions, twelve feet square. The head is panelled in the Elizabethan style of arched panels, and a date is painted on it — 1460. [This, however, is not authentic.] It is of carved oak. The top is covered by a panelled tester, supported on baluster columns at the feet. The bases of these rest on a cluster of four arches or supports to each column.” Nothing is known of the original history of the bedstead. Shakespeare alludes to it in Twelfth Night. To the Tudor and Jacobean period of heavy oak furniture suc- ceeded the custom of supplying the place of oak-panelled testers 120 FURNITURE. and headboards with rich hangings either of tapestry, cut Genoa, or Venice velvets and other costly materials, with ostrich feathers or other ornaments on the angles. The royal beds at Hampton court admirably illustrate this stately fashion, as in the accompanying woodcut. More modern changes it is unnecessary to trace. Couches for reclining or sitting upon were, in the middle ages, rather benches with cushions on them. The king conversing with a lady in her chamber is from a manu- script of about 1390 (the “Romance of Meliadus) in the British museum. In the seventeenth century we find the same ornaments that were used in chair backs extended to large frames so as to form them into couches, and the same plaited cane panels. In the last century, sofas were sometimes made in the form of several chair backs, with arms at each end, the backs being pierced work or framing FURNITURE. I 2 I made of bars in fancy shapes. This work was in mahogany or satin wood, or was painted after the fashion of vernis-martin work. In all cases such pieces were made to accord with suites of chairs, tables, &c. Cradles have been made in many shapes. The most approved in antiquity was that of a boat, (nos , or a shield ; in either case they could be rocked. In the fourteenth century the men of Ghent destroyed the house of the earl of Flanders, according to Froissart, and all his furniture including the cradle in which he was nursed, which was of silver. The cradle of Henry the fifth is still preserved. It is in the form of a chest, much like the cradle in the Kensington museum, n°- 1769 ; and swings on posts, one at each end, standing on cross-bars to keep them steady : but there is no higher portion, as in the example in the musuem, to support a tester. A hundred years later the shape seems to have become heavier. In the ancient Egyptian paintings at Thebes, and elsewhere, chairs are minutely represented like the throne or arm chair of the Greeks, each containing one person. Occasionally they used stools and low seats raised a little above the ground. Some sat cross-legged on the ground, though this is more rare, or kneeling on one knee. The men and women generally were apart, but in r 2 2 FURNITURE. the same room ; while conversing they sat, and did not recline. Wilkinson gives a full description of the old Egyptian chairs and stools. The classical curule chairs were made of ivory ; sometimes of solid and entire elephants’ teeth, which seems to have been the typical idea of the ivory chair ; sometimes the ivory was veneered on a wooden base. The foot or point of the tusk was carved into a head or beak. It is from this curved chair of state that the later chairs were derived, of which the form remained popular in Italy through the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The mediae- val name was faldistorium , rendered “ faldstool,” a stool or seat to support the arms when kneeling, or to act as a chair when sitting. The earliest type of the architectural 'thrones or chairs of the middle ages is the ancient chair of St. Peter, at Rome, of which a woodcut has been given in p. 35. A full description and plates of it will be found in the “ Vetusta monumenta ” of the Society of antiquaries for 1870. Another famous chair, that of St. Mark, is preserved at Venice, in the treasury of St. Mark’s. Anciently this chair, like that of St. Peter in Rome, was covered with plates of ivory, carved panels probably fitted into frame pieces of wood as a covering to the stone. As it is now seen, how- ever, the work is of oriental marble. It is a rudely shaped arm chair, with high back sloping upwards in the form of a pedi- ment, truncated and surmounted by a stone, cut into an imperfect circle or oval, and having an arm or volute like the reversed angle-volute of a column projecting from the lower part of each side. The chair of St. Maximian at Ravenna dates from the FURNITURE. 123 sixth century ; this is described in Mr. Maskell’s “ Ivories.” A magnificent fourteenth century architectural chair of silver is pre- served at Barcelona. The supports represent window tracery. One large arch supplies the front support, being cusped, and these cusps are again subdivided. The two sides form each a pair of windows of two lights or divisions, with a circle above, the whole cusped and having trefoil leaves on the cusps. The back is open tracery work, representing three narrow windows, with two lights or openings each. They finish in three lofty gables, crocketed outside and divided into tracery within. Chairs in England dur- ing the mediaeval period were sometimes made of turned wood. Sometimes they were cleverly arranged to fold up, as in our own days : the engraving (p. 122) is from a beautiful manu- script of the fifteenth cen- tury. The chair known as that of Glastonbury is a square board on two pairs of cross-trestles, with a square board for a back, held to the seat by slop- ing arm pieces, shaped out to receive the arms of a sitter. On the edges of the seat and back tenons protrude, long enough to pass through mortices in the leg and arm pieces, which are pegged to keep them firm. Like the sixteenth century curule chairs these can easily be taken to pieces for travelling. 124 FURNITURE. During the reigns of Elizabeth and James, high-backed chairs, richly cut and pierced, with wooden, afterwards with cane, seats were used and remained in use simplified and lightened during more than a century. The woodcut (p. 123) represents the fashion of chair common in Italy about the year 1620: and from thence introduced into England. The use of marquetry was not confined to tables and cabinets. Rich chairs were made in this material (rarely in boule) during the eighteenth century in France, Italy, and Holland, from whence they came to this country. Light and very elegant yellow satin- wood marquetry chairs were also then in fashion. The use of mahogany for chairs, often delicately carved and admirably con- structed, was general during the last century in England. The French carved chairs of the time of Louis the sixteenth covered with silk all but the legs and framework, and painted white or gilt, were made to accord with the sofas and carved woodwork of the rooms. This example was followed in England, with certain national differences. Tables. The ancient Egyptian tables were round, square, or oblong ; the former were generally used during their repasts, and consisted of a circular flat summit, supported, like the monopodium of the Romans, on a single shaft or leg in the centre or by the figure of a man intended to represent a captive. Large tables had usually three or four legs, but some were made with solid sides; and though generally of wood many were of metal or stone ; and they varied in size according to the different purposes for which they were intended. Often they were three-legged, the legs in a concave shape. An antique marble table of Graeco-Roman work is preserved at Naples, supported by a centaur in full relief at one end, and a sea monster, Scylla it is supposed, involving a shipwrecked .mariner in the folds of her tail, with indications of waves, &c., FURNITURE. 125 round her body. Other Roman tables of larger dimensions had three, four, or five supports of sphinxes, lions, and the like. We give representations of three kinds of tables from paintings on vases ; and another, on three marble legs, found at Pompeii. In the middle ages, as has been before said, tables were generally folding boards laid on trestles and moveable. The general disposition of the dining table was taken from those of abbeys and convents, and may be seen continued in some of our own colleges to this day. The principal table was on a raised platform or floor at the upper end of the hall, and thence called the “High” table. The guests sat on one side only, as in the traditional representations of the Last Supper, and the place of honour was the centre, the opposite side being left for the service. The principal person sat under a canopy or cloth of estate, either made for the occasion, or under a panelled canopy curving out- ward and permanent. Occasionally mediaeval tables in England were of stone or marble. Of the former material a table is pre- served belonging to the strangers’ hall at Winchester ; and a wooden one in the chapter-house at Salisbury. The tops of some 26 FURNITURE. old English tables are made with two thicknesses, the lower pulling out on either side to rest on supports drawn from the bed. A table of this description is kept at Hill hall, Essex ; and the woodcut represents a folding table of the time of Elizabeth, long preserved at Flaxton Hall, in Suffolk. During the last century maho- gany tables with de- licate pierced galle- ries round the edge, and similar work to ornament the bed or frame, were made by Chippendale and his contemporaries. Many of them are light and graceful pieces of construction. Others were massively made with goat- footed legs that bulge well beyond the lines of the table top, which in these cases is often a slab of marble. The workman- ship is admirable. Mahogany had then supplanted the use of oak for large tables. Chests , Cabinets , and Sideboards. The wardrobe, both in the Roman house and the mediaeval castle, was a small room suitably fitted up and provided with receptacles. Chests, coffers, and caskets were also in use, and implied moveability. In later days the renaissance chests were either mounted on stands or gave place to mixed structures ; and cabinets of various forms that could be kept permanently in the hall or chamber became the fashion. They were large, important FURNITURE. I2 7 objects, were never moved or carried abroad, descended from father to son, and were the monumental objects, as the panelled superstructure of the fireplace was, of halls and reception rooms. These pieces have various forms. In dining halls or rooms occasionally so used, they were cupboards, dressers, or places with a small receptacle to hold food, and a flat top with perhaps a step or shelf above it to carry plate, candlesticks, &c. When placed in receiving rooms or to hold dresses they were cabinets or wardrobes ; for the convenle-neos^of writing they are bureaux, secretaires, or escritoires./^ ; \ We have early noticek oir L thb use of cypress chests, perhaps cabinets as some of them -^vith drawers, in this country. John of Gaunt in his will, 1397, specifies “a little box of cypress wood probably something like the chest engraved from a manu- script of that date : out of which the servant is taking a robe evidently richly embroidered with armorial bearings. In the memoirs of the antiquities of Great Britain, relating to the reformation, we find an account of church plate, money, gold 128 FURNITURE. and silver images, &c., delivered to Henry the eighth : “ Paid William Grene, the king’s coffer-maker , for making of a coffer covered with fustyan of Naples, and being full of drawers and boxes lined with red and grene sarcynet to put in stones of divers sorts, vi .If. xviij.r. ij. d .,” by which we may gather some- thing of its costly construction, “ and to Cornelys the locke smythe for making all the iron worke, that is to say, the locke, gymours, handels, ryngs to every drawer box, the price xxxvi. s. iv. dl The marquetry invented or brought to perfection by Boule was displayed in greater magnificence on cabinets of various shapes than on any other pieces of furniture. The same may be said of the marquetry cabinets in wood executed during the eighteenth century in France by Riesener and David, with the help of the metal mounts of Gouthiere and his contemporaries. In these fine pieces the interior is generally simple and the conceits of the previous century are omitted. Japan cabinets obtained through the Dutch were frequently imported into England. The hinges and mounts were of silver or gilt metal, richly chased. The bureau, escritoire, or office desk, called in Germany Kaunitz after a princely inventor, was a knee-hole table. These tall bureaux were of general, almost universal, use in England during the last century. Sideboards. There are several old sideboards in the Kensington museum, described under the names of d?'essoir or dressoir de salle a manger in the large catalogue. They are small cupboards and would be called cabinets but for the drawers half-way down, and the rows of the shelves on the top; and are of the six- teenth century date. According to Willemin, the old etiquette of France, certainly that of Burgundy, prescribed five steps or shelves to these dressers for use during meals for queens ; four for duchesses or princesses ; three for their children and for countesses and grandes dames ; two for other noble ladies. In FURNITURE. 129 the middle ages cupboards or dressers were mere covered boards or shelves against a wall on which plate was set out, and were made of three or four or more stages according to the splendour of the occasion. The cupboard dresser of more modest pretensions was considered as a piece of dining-room furniture. It was ordinarily covered with a piece of embroidery. Robert Frevyll bequeaths, 1521, to his “son John a stone cobard in the hall.” A manuscript inventory of Henry the eighth names, “ Item, one large cuppbord carpet of grene cloth of gold with workes lyned with bockeram, conteyning in length three yards, iii. q’ters, and three bredthes.” In the herald’s account of the feast at Westminster, on the occasion of the marriage of prince Arthur, we find “ There was also a stage of dyvers greas and hannes (degrees and enhancings of height) for the cuppbord that the plate shulde stande inn, the which plate for the moost part was clene (pure) goold, and the residue all gilte and non silver, and was in length from the closet doore to the chimney.” And when in the next reign Henry entertained Francis at Calais, a cupboard of seven stages was provided and furnished with gold and silver gilt plate. Before concluding these remarks on dining-room furniture something may be said on painted roundels or wooden platters. Though they have long ceased to be used for their original pur- pose, several sets still complete remain in country houses and col- lections of different kinds ; and three sets are in the Kensington museum. They are usually twelve in number : and all seem to be of the date of the late Tudor princes. They were kept in boxes turned out of a block, and decorated with painting and gilding. Their size does not differ materially, all the sets varying from 5f to 5! inches. There are, however, smaller sets to be seen which range from 2f to 5 inches in diameter. The top surface is in all instances plain and the under surface painted with a border of flowers, generally alternating with knots more or less artistically drawn in vermilion : “ posyes ” or a couple of K 130 FURNITURE. verses are generally added. These platters were used in the sixteenth century as dessert plates, the plain side being at the top. Leland speaks of the “confettes” at the end of a dinner, “ sugar plate fertes, with other subtilties with ippocrass” (a sweet wine). Earthenware plates though not unknown were still very uncommon in England before the reign of Elizabeth. The dinner was served on plate in royal or very great houses, on pewter and wooden trenchers in more humble and unpretending households. Speci- mens of the latter may still be seen in our old collegiate esta- blishments. Probably the earliest instance of the use of earthen- ware may be found in the time of Edward the first, when some dishes and plates of that material were bought from a Spanish ship. Pitchers, jugs and the like had been for centuries com- monly made. “ Porselyn” is mentioned in 1587 : where we read of “ five dishes of earth painted, such as are brought from Venice” being presented to the queen on one of her progresses. Carriages. The shape and decoration of carriages have changed con- tinually, but these changes have not always been in the direction of convenience and handiness for rapid motion. Our space will not allow us to enter here upon a history of the chariots of ancient nations ; Egyptians, Greeks, or Romans. A detailed account of them will be found in the introduction to the large catalogue of furniture at South Kensington. The woodcut represents the Roman “ biga,” the original of which (in marble) is FURNITURE. 1 3 1 in the Vatican ; and the “ pilentum,” or covered carriage, from the column of Theodosius. We know but little of the period succeeding the destruction ol Rome and the extinction of classic customs. In the middle ages we find carts, like those now in use for agricultural purposes in France ; a long frame with spreading rails balanced on one pair of wheels of large dimensions, drawn by a string of horses. The woodcut of a family carriage is from the well-known Luttrell psalter, an illuminated manuscript of the early fourteenth century. Such vehicles seem to have been clumsy enough and had no springs : nevertheless they were much ornamented with various decorations. They had roofs as a protection from the weather, with silk or leather curtains ; and the interior was fitted with cushions. In the “ Squire of low degree” the father of the princess of Hungary promises, To-morrow ye shall on hunting fare, And ride my daughter in a chare, It shall be covered with velvet red, And cloths of fine gold all about your head, With damask white and azure blue, Well diapered with lilies new, Your pomelles (knobs) shall be ended with gold, Your chains enamelled many a fold. The oldest kind of wheel-carriages known in England were called whirlecotes , and one of these belonged to the mother of I 3 2 FURNITURE. Richard the second. Whirlecotes were used also at the marriage of Katherine of Arragon. Coaches were probably first intro- duced from Hungary. They seem to have been square, not differing greatly in outline from the state coaches of which numerous engraved plates can be seen ; and were considered as too effeminate a conveyance for men in the days of Elizabeth. The coach of Henry the fourth of France may be studied in the plate by Van Luyken that represents his murder by Ravaillac, 1610. It is four-wheeled, square, with a flat awning on four corner pillars or supports, and curtains. The centre descends into a kind of boot with leather sides. The accompanying woodcut represents the carriage of the English ambassador at Rome in 1 688 : and we add also an engraving of a state carriage of about fifty years later, still in the possession of Lord Darnley. APPENDIX. NAMES OF DESIGNERS OF WOODWORK AND MAKERS OF FURNITURE. Only very meagre notices are to be found of the artists to whom we owe the designs of modern furniture. For a hundred and fifty years after the renaissance, furniture partook so generally, and the wood- work of rooms so entirely, of the character and followed so con- tinually the details of architecture that the history of furniture- designers is that of the architects of the day. These found in the members of guilds of carvers, carpenters, or image sculptors admir- able hands to carry out the ornamental details of their woodwork, such as chimney-pieces, &c., and who made sideboards, cabinets, chairs, and tables to suit the woodwork. We have space here only for the names ; in the large catalogue a brief notice of almost every one of them is also given. • Names of Artists. | Country in which they worked. Date. A Adam, J. (and R.) England . . . 1728-1792. Agnolo, B. da . Italy .... 1460-1563. Agnolo, D. da 99 * 16th century. Agnola, J. da ...... 99 .... 9 9 9 9 Ambrogio, G 99 .... 17th Ards, W . Flanders . . . 15th Asinelis, A Italy .... 1 6th ,, B Bachelier, — France 1 6th century. Baerze, J. de Flanders . . . 14th ,, Baker, — England . 1 8th , , Barili, A. Italy .... 16th ,, Barili, G 9 9 9 9 Barili, S „ . . . . 9 9 9 9 APPENDIX. * 34 - Names of Artists. Country in which they worked. Date. Baumgartner, U Germany . . . 17th century. Beaugreant, G. de Flanders . . . 16th ,, Beck, S Germany . 99 9 9 Belli, A. A. ....... Italy .... France . . . 9 9 9 9 Belli, G 9 9 99 Berain, J. ....... . 1636-1711. Bergamo, D. da Italy . . . H 90 ~ l 55 o- Bergamo, S. da ..... . 99 • 1 6th century. Bernardo, — „ .... 9 9 9 9 Berruguete, — Spain .... 1480-1561. Bertolina, B. J. Italy .... 1 6th century . Beydert, J. Flanders . . . 15th Blondeel, L ,,.... 1495 - 1560 . Bolgie, G. ....... . Italy .... 1 8th century.. Bonzanigo, G. M ,, .... 1 6th ,, Borello, F. ....... . ,, .... Borgona, F. de ...... Spain .... 99 99 Botto, B. ........ Italy .... Botto, G. B. . 9 9 9 9 Botto, P. If .... ” Botto, S. A. ....... 99 .... Boulle, A. C France . . . 1642-1732. Boulle, P ,, .... 17th century. Brescia, R. da . . . . . Italy .... 1 6th ,, Bross, — de France 17 th Bruggemann, H. . Germany . . . 15 th Bruhl, A Flanders . . . 1 6th and 17th centuries. Brunelleschi, F. ..... Italy .... I 377 - I 44 6 - Brustolone, A. ...... . 99 * 1670-1732. Buontalenti, B. T. ..... 1 6th century. C Caffieri, Ph France . . . 17th and 1 8th centuries. Cano, A. ........ Spain .... 17th century. Canova, J. de ...... . Italy .... 16th Canozii, C. ....... Canozii, G. M. ...... 9 9 • 9 9 9 9 Canozii, L Capitsoldi, — ....... England . . . 1 8th ” Capo di Ferro, Brothers . . Italy .... 1 6th Carlone, J 9 9 1 8th Carnicero, A Spain .... i 693 ~ i 756 - Castelli, Q Italy .... 1 6th century Cauner, — ........ France . . . 1 8th APPENDIX. *35 Names of Artists. Country in which they worked. Date. Cauvet, G. P France . . . 1731-1788. Ceracci, G. England . . . 1 8th century. Cervelliera, B. del Italy . . . 9 9 9 9 1726-1796. Chambers, Sir W England . . . Chippendale, T 9 9 • • • 1 8th century. Cipriani, G. B. ,, ... 9 9 9 9 Coit, — ■ 9 9 ... 9 9 9 9 Collet, A 9 9 ... 9 9 9 9 Copeland, — 9 9 ... 9 9 9 9 Cotte, J. de France . . . 9 9 9 9 Cotte, R. de 9 9 ... 1656-1735- Cotton, C England . . . 1 8th century. Cressent, — France . . . 9 9 9 9 D Davy, R. . England . . . 1750-1794. Dello Delli -Italy .... 14th and 15th centuries. Dolen, — van . Flanders . . . 1 8th century. Donatello, — - Italy .... 1380-1466. Dorsient, A. C. ; C. Oc. . > . Flanders . . . 16th century. Ducerceau, A . France . . . 1515-1585. Dugar, E ; . . . Italy .... 1 6th century. Du Quesnoy, F. H. and J. . . . Flanders . . . 17th F Faydherbe, L Flanders . . . 1627-1694. Filippo, D. di Italy .... 1 6th century. Florein, J Flanders . . . 15th Flotner, P. . . Germany . . . 16th ,, G Gabler, M Germany . . . 17th century. Galletti, G Italy .... 18th ,, Gamier, P France 9 9 9 9 Genser, M Germany . . . 17th Gervasius England . . . Gettich, P Germany . I 7 th „ Geuser, M 9 9 ... 9 9 9 9 Gheel, F. van Flanders . . . 18th ,, Gibbons, G England . . . 17th Giovanni, Fra Italy .... 16th ,, Glosencamp, H Flanders . . . ,, y y Goujon, T 1 France . . . 1 9 9 9 9 APPENDIX. 136 Names of Artists. H Habermann, — . . . . Haeghen, — van der . . Heckinger, J Heinhofer, Ph Helmont, — van .... Heppelwhite, A Hernandez, G Hool, T. B. van . . . . Huet, — Hyman, F Country in which they worked. Date. France . . . 1 8th century. Flanders . . . Germany . . . 17th ,, 1 6th and 17th centuries. yy ... Flanders . . . 1 8th century. 1586-1646. England . . . Spain .... Flanders . . . 1 8th century. y y > ? France . . . England . . . yy yy J John of St. Omer . Johnson, T. . . Juni, J. D. . . K Kauffmann, A. Kiskner, U. . . Kuenlin, J. . . . England . Spain . . England . Germany . 13th century. 1 8th ,, 1 6th and 17th centuries. 1 8th century. 17th ,, y y yy L Ladetto, F. . . . Lalonde, — . . Lawreans, — . Lecreux, N. A. J. Le Moyne, J. . Leopardi, A. . Le Pautre, J. . . Le Roux, J. B. Linnell, J. . . . Lock, M. . . . Loir, A. . . . . L’Orme, Ph. de. . Lunigia, A. da M Mace, J. . . . Maffeis, P. di . Maggiolino, — Magister, O. . Majano, B. da Italy . France England Flanders France Italy . France England y y France Italy . France Italy . 1 8th century. y y yy 17th 1757-1836. 1645-1718. 1450-1525- 1617-1682. 1 8th century. yy yy 1630-1713. 1 6th century. 1 8th century. 15th ,, r8th 16th ,, ! 15th APPENDIX. i37 Names of Artists. Country in which they worked. Date. Majano, G. da Italy .... I432-I490. Margaritone, — )) .... 1236-1313. Marot, I). ....... . France . . . 1650-17OO ? Marot, G. ....... , , 17th century. Marot, J. ,, .... 1625-1679. Martin, R ,, .... 1706-1765. Martincourt, — ,, .... 1 8th century. Meissonnier, J. A , , . i 6 9 3 - i 75 °. Mendeler, G Germany . 17th century. Meulen, R. van der Flanders . 1645-1717. Minore, G Italy .... 15th century. Modena, P. da ,, ,, Moenart, M Flanders . . . 1 7th , , Montepulciano, G. da . . . . Italy .... 1 6th „ Moser, L Germany . 15th Muller, D 17th ,, 9 9 99 Miilier, J ” * ‘ • N Newrone, G. C Italy .... 1 6th century. Nilson, — France 1 8th Nys, L. de Flanders . . . y' } y Nys, P. de „ ... 9 9 9 9 0 Oost, P. van Flanders . 14th century. Oppenord, — France 1 8th ,, P Pacher, M. . Germany . . . 15th century. Padova, Z. da Italy .... 1 6th , , Panturmo, J. di Pardo, G Spain .... 1 6th century. Pareta, G. di | Italy .... ,, ,, Passe, C. de France . . . 17th Passe, C. de, the younger . . . , , ,, ,, Pergolese, — England . 1 8th Perreal, J France . . 15 th Philippon, A ,, .... 16th ,, Picau, — 99 .... Flanders . . 1 8th , , Picq, J 17th Pigalle, — England . 1 8th ,, Piffetti, A. P Italy .... 1700-1777. Plumier, P. D Flanders . 1688-1721. Porfirio, B. di Italy .... 1 6th century. 38 APPENDIX. Names of Artists. Country in which they worked. Q Quellin, A Flanders . . . Quellin, A., the younger . . . 99 ... Quellin, E 9 9 ... R Raephorst, B. van Flanders . Ramello, F Italy .... Ranson, — France . . . Rasch, A Flanders . . . Riesener, — France . . . Roentgen, D 99 • • * • Rohan, J. de 9 9 Rohan, J. de 99 • * * * Rosch, J Germany . . . Rossi, P. de Italy .... Rovezzano, B. da England . . . S Salembier, — France . . . Sangher, J. de Flanders . . . Schelden, P. van der .... ,, ... Schwanhard, H Germany . Serlius, S France Servellino, G. del Italy .... Sheraton, Th England . Smet, R. de Flanders . Stoss, V Germany . . . Syrlin, J 9 9 ... Syrlin, J., the younger .... 9 9 ... T Taillebert, U Flanders . . . Tasso, D Italy .... Tasso, G Tasso, G. B 99 .... Tasso, M. D 99 .... Tatham, C. H England . . . Taurini, R Italy .... Thomire, P. Ph France . . . Tolfo, G ! Italy .... Date. 1609-1668. 1625-1700. 17th century. 15th century. 1 6th „ 1 8th 15th ,, 18th ,, 16th ,, 15th 15 th and 1 6th centuries. 1 6th century. 1 8th and 19th centuries. 17th century. 16th ,, 17th 16th ,, 15th 18th ,, 16th ,, 1438-1533- 15th century. 15th and 1 6th centuries. 1 6th century. 15th and 1 6th centuries. 15th century. 1 8th „ 16th ,, 1751-1843. 1 6th century. APPENDIX. i39 Names of Artists. Toro, — Torrigiano, — . Toto, — Trevigi, G. da U Uccello, P Ugliengo, C V Venasca, G. P Verbruggen, P Verbruggen, P., the younger . . Verhaegen, Th Voyers, — • Vriesse, V. de W Walker, H Weinkopf, W Willemsens, L. ...... William the Florentine .... Wilton, j Z Zabello, F Zorn, G Country in which they worked. Date. France . . . England . . . 9 9 • • • 9 9 • 1 8th century. 1472-1522. I33I-I35I- I 3°4~ I 344- Italy .... 9 9 • 1396-1479- 1 8th century. Italy .... Flanders . . . 9 9 * 9 9 ... England . . . France 1 8th century. 17th 1660-1724. 1 8th century. 17 th England . Germany . Flanders . England . 1 6th century. 9 9 9 9 1635-1702. 13th century. 1 8th ,, Italy .... Germany . . . 1 6th century. 17th INDEX. Adam, Robert and John, 112 Alexandria, ancient centre of civilisa- tion, 17 Anglo-saxon houses, 44 Antioch, ancient centre of civilisa- tion, 17 Architectural style in furniture, 94 Art, classic, ends in third century, 34 ,, Byzantine, 35 ,, mediaeval, its growth, 41 ,, ,, its perfection, 47 ,, Romanesque, long continuance, 42 ,, renaissance, 66 ,, classic, revived in eighteenth century, 107 ,, „ early nineteenth century, 114 Atrium, 18 Attalus introduces tapestry, 17 Bedrooms, English, fourteenth cen- tury, 50 ,, French, eighteenth cen- tury, 104 Beds, Byzantine period, 37 ,, Norman, 46 ,, Egyptian, Greek, &c., 116 ,, Mediaeval, 118, 119 ,, at Hampton Court, 120 Bellows, renaissance, 72 Bombe furniture, 104, hi B oucher, 108 Boule, 95 Bureaux in marquetry, 93, 104 ,, or knee-hole, 128 Byzantine period, 3 c ,, wealth, 38 „ artists welcomed by Char- lemagne, 41 Cabinet, French, sixteenth century, 89 ,, Japan, 128 Cafass, Egyptian wood, 4 Candelabra, 23, 24 Candles, Anglo-saxon, &c., 45, 48 Carriage, Anglo-saxon, 45 ,, fourteenth century, 54, 13 1 ,, seventeenth century, 92 „ the Speaker’s, 132 ,, Lord Darnley’s, 132 Caskets, Byzantine, 37 Ceilings in Roman houses, 21, 31 Chair, Egyptian, 4, 12 1 „ Nineveh, 7 „ Greek, 10, 1 1, 14 ,, Roman, 28, 122 ,, of St. Peter, 35 ,, Byzantine, 37 ,, at Ravenna, 39, 122 ,, in Bayeux tapestry, 45 ,, coronation, 49 ,, of Guidobaldo, 63 ,, Italian, fifteenth century, 63 ,, folding mediaeval, 122 ,, of silver, at Barcelona, 123 ,, the Glastonbury, 123 ,, Italian, seventeenth century, 124 ,, marquetry, 124 Chambers, Sir William, 106 Chariots, Hebrew, 9 „ Greek, 15 „ Roman, 130 ,, Byzantine, 37 Chest, Greek, 11 ,, Roman, 29 ,, of king John, 47 ,, fourteenth century, 51 ,, for copes, 56 ,, fifteenth century, 60 INDEX. r 4 1 Chest, Italian, 61 ,, renaissance, 69, 71 Chiraneypieces, eighteenth century, 106 Chippendale, 106 Cipriani, 112 Cluny hotel, carriages there, 2 Colbert, his patronage of art, 94 Couches, Egyptian, 5 ,, Roman, 13 ,, mediaeval, 120 Coypel, Antoine, 104 Cradle, mediaeval, 12 1 Cubicula, 20 Cypress chests, 70, 127 Dagobert’s chair, 43 David, 105 Delafosse, 104, 108 Dilettanti society, influence, 1 1 5 Dining-room, Byzantine, 38 Diptych of Anastasius, 36 Distaff, 106 Doorway, English, seventeenth cen- tury, 98 “Droit de prisage,” 54 Ebenistes, fine cabinet makers, 108 Ebony used seventeenth century, 108 Egyptian furniture, 5 Elizabethan style, 85 Flemish furniture, seventeenth cen- tury, 87 Fragonard, 108 French style prevalent in eighteenth century, 103, 105 Furniture, use of a collection, 1 ,, Byzantine, still perhaps in mosques and treasuries, 40 ,, sixteenth century, archi- tectural, 75 ,, eighteenth century, 103 ,, bombe, explained, 104 German artists in England, sixteenth century, 78 ,, work, eighteenth century, 1 1 1 Gillow, 1 13 Glass windows in Roman houses, 20 ,, mosaics, & c., 22 ,, Venetian, 99 Glue used by the Romans, 33 Gouthiere, 105, no Greek manners, simple, 12 ,, houses, 14 Grinling Gibbons, 97 „ best examples of his work, 97 Halls in Roman villas, 20 Hebrew furniture, 8 Heppelwhite, 113 Hogarth, paintings of chiraneypieces, 106 Holbein, his influence, 78 Holy-water stoup, 102 House, Roman, 18 „ Greek, 14 „ how warmed in Rome, 29 ,, Anglo-saxon and Norman, 44, 46 ,, of timber, fifteenth century, 58 Iconoclasts, destruction by, 40 Italian coffer at South Kensington, 61 „ artists, sixteenth century, 68 ,, ,, in France and Eng- land, 78, 89 „ carved woodwork, sixteenth century, 89 „ distaff, 106 Japanese lac- work, 106 Kauffmann (Angelica), 112 Kaunitz, a kind of bureau, 128 Kitchen utensils, Roman, 30 Knife case, sixteenth century, 76 Lac-work, Chinese and Japanese, 106 Lalonde, 108 Lares, 28 Lebrun, first head of the “ Gobelins,” 95 Le Pautre family, 104 Litters, Roman, 31 Lock (Matthias), 112 Locks in Roman houses, 2 1 Louvre, Egyptian boxes, 6 Maggiolino, ill Mansard, 104 Marquetry, Venetian, 62 ,, seventeenth century, 92,93 „ Boule, 95 leissonnier, 104, 108 fetallurgy, British, 42 Micque, 108 Mirror, Greek, 13 ,, renaissance, 69 142 INDEX. Mirror frames, sixteenth century, 71 „ „ Venetian, 91, 99 „ made in England, seven- teenth century, 99, 100 Mosaic, Roman, pavements and on walls, 19 ,, or pietra dura, 74 Natoire, 108 Nero, colossus in his house, 25 Nineveh furniture, 6 Nuptiale, 18 (Eci, 20 Oppenord, 108 Ostium, 18 Paintings and pictures in Roman houses, 22 „ in thirteenth century, of rooms, 48, 49 Panelling for rooms, 49 ,, oriental, 57 „ of a chest, 60 ,, English, sixteenth century, 79, 80 ,, French, sixteenth century, 84 „ English, 8'6 Pedestal, 90 Penates, 18 Peristylium, 20 Persian furniture, 8 ,, marquetry, 63 Picture-frames, renaissance, 71 Pomeranian cabinet at Berlin, 92 Pompeii, value of discoveries, 16 Porcelain given to Queen Elizabeth, 130 Pottery, time of Edward I., 49 Pudens, ancient house of, 20 Pugin, 1 14 Queverdo, 108 Religious houses, their woodwork, 63 „ ,, safe generally from spoliation, 67 Renaissance in Italy, 66 ,, materials employed, 69 „ in England, France, & c.* 78 Restout, Jean, 104 Riesener, 105, 108, 109 Robert, 108 Rococo furniture, 103 Roentgen, 108, 109 Roman habits, at first simple, 16 ,, house, 18 ,, couches in dining-rooms, 19, 27 „ locks and hinges, 21 „ tables, 25 ,, chairs, 28 „ kitchen utensils, 30 Roof of Westminster Hall, 55 Room decorations, French, eighteenth century, 107 Room of’ Marie Antoinette’s time at South Kensington, 107 Roundels, 129 Salembier, 108 Scamnum, 28 Sculpture, architectural, See., four- teenth century, 56 ,, renaissance, 69 Settle or seat, fourteenth century, 51 Sheraton, Thomas, 113 Sideboards, 128 Silks for furniture, eighteenth century, 107 Stuart style of woodwork and furni- ture, 85, 96 Table, Egyptian, 124 ,, Nineveh, 8 „ Roman, 25, 125 ,, ,, veneered, 27 ,, ,, great value, 27 ,, Norman, 46 ,, furniture of, fourteenth cen- tury, 50 „ fourteenth and fifteenth cen- tury, S 3 , 58, 125 „ sixteenth century, 71 ,, of Francesco de’ Medici, 75 ,, French, sixteenth century, 80, 81 „ English, seventeenth century, 102 ,, long kept at Flaxton Hall, 126 Tapestry first brought to Rome, 17 „ in Roman houses, 30 ,, in England, fourteenth cen- tury, See., 50, 61 „ Gobelin, 95 Tarsia, 62, 73, 74 Temple of Diana, 33 Theatre of C. Curio, 32 Tigrinse tables, 26 INDEX. 43 Triclinium, 18, 117 Tripods, 22 Tudor cabinet at South Kensington, 78 „ style, 85 t Vase from Hadrian’s villa, 25 Venetian mirror-frame, 91 Vernis-Martin, 105 Vestiaria, 20 Walpole (Horace), opinion on medi- aeval art, in Wardrobe, old English, 49 ,, Roman, 126 Wars of the Roses, evil consequences, 64 Wood used in Nineveh, 8 „ ,, Greece, 15 „ „ Rome, for tables, &c., 26, 32 ,, ,, by Riesener, 109 Woodwork, English, in thirteenth cen- tury, 48 ,, sixteenth cen- tury, 79 ,, Germany, in sixteenth century, 83 ,, Spanish, in sixteenth cen- tury, 84 ,, Tudor and Stuart, 86 Wren, Sir Christopher, 97 Wyattville, 114 M. F. A.) THE END. PRINTED BY VIRTUE AND CO., CITY ROAD, LONDON. GETTY CENTER LIBRARY 3 3125 00641 2502