GUIDE T O CLASSICAL LEARNING: O R, POLYMETIS ABRIDGED. CONTAINING, I. By Way of Introduction, the Characters of the Latin Poets and their Works. The Rife, Growth, and Fall of the polite arts among the Romans. The Ufeful- nefs of Antiques towards explaining the Classics. A true Idea of the Al- legories of the Anti- en ts, and of their whole Scheme of Machinery, or Interposition of the Gods ; with Remarks on the Defeds of our beft Allegorifts and Artifts for Want of fuch an Idea. II. An Inquiry concerning the Agreement between the Works of the Roman Po- ets and the Remains of the an tien t Artists, in order to illuftrate them mu- tually from one another. Being a WORK abfolutely necefiary, not only for the right Understanding of the Classics, but alfo for forming in young Minds a true Taste for the Beauties of POETRY, SCULPTURE, and PAINTING. The FOURTH EDITION. Uluftrated with Twenty-eight Prints from original A n t i qjj e s, and more particularly adapted to the Ufe of SCHOOLS and ACADEMIES. By N. T I N D A L, Tranfiator of R A P I N. LONDON: Printed for J. Dodsley, in Pall-MalL MDCCLXXYII, THE PREFACE. MR. SPENCE is the firft who may be faid to have joined the ftudy of the antiques to that of criticism \ The refult of this junction was his elabo- rate Inquiry concerning the Agreement be- tween the works of the Roman poets and the remains of the antient artists, in order to illuftrate them from one an- other ; and to that end he has collected no lefs than 3000 paflages from the La* tin poets and others, relating to the alle- gorical beings received as deities among the Romans. The following meets are a complete a- bridgement of this excellent treafure of claftical learning ; the nature of the work * This connexion, though fpoken of in general both by antients and moderns, has not been han- dled, in particular, by any writer, except Mr. Addifon, in his Treatife on medals, who made but a very fmall progrefs in it. A 2 being PREFACE, being fuch, that by omitting the quota- rations, (which the young ftudent may eafily turn to,) and retaining only the re- ferences, all the reft may be reduced to a frmill pocket- volume. As there has never been any thing of this kind publifhed before, the abridger, (who then had but lately happened to light on Polymetis,) was furpriled that no one fliould have thought of epitomizing a work fo very capable of it, and of which a compendium could not but be extremely ufeful for fchools and academies. For the defcriptions and expreflions in the Roman poets having never been fo carefully com- pared with the noble remains of the old artifts, there had not been any authentic reprefentations of the figures, attributes, drefs, attitudes, and other appearances of the Roman deities b . And how neceffary b The figures of the Roman deities and the re- prefentations of the moral beings have generally fomething to diftinguifh them. Thefe marks are called figna in Latin, and attributes by our artifts; fuch as Neptune's trident, the ivy-crown of Bac- chus, the laurel one of Apollo. So Juftice is diilinguifhed by her equal balance, Honefty by a tranfparent veil, Modelty by a veil, &c. See p. xxvi. towards PREFACE. towards the underftanding of the clafiic s an exact knowledge of thefe things is for a fchool-boy, evidently appears from the allufions to them in almoft every line of the Latin poets. Neither had it ever been attempted to mew the real intent and de- fign of the allegories of the antients, and the true nature of their machinery or inter- pofition of the Gods ; tho' without a right notion of thefe, it is impoflible for the young ftudent (or indeed any body elfe) ever to have a true fenfe of the beauties of the polite arts. Now in this Abridgement the appear- ances of the Roman deities are accurately defcribed, and the real intent of the alle- gories and machinery of the antients is clearly fet forth ; and therefore in thefe refpects it is undoubtedly preferable to any fchool-book of the kind hitherto publimed. For, What an advantage mud it be for the youths at fchool to fet out with a right no- tion of thefe things ? how inftru&ive to have a true idea of that fimplicity, plain- nefs, and propriety of the antient allego- ries, by which they are characterized, and A3 to PREFACE. to be acquainted with the true nature of the machinery of the antients, that it was built upon the univerfal belief in thofe days that man could do nothing of himfelf, but was actuated in every thing by the direction of fome god or other, and that, in confe- quence of this fingle principle, a proper deity might be introduced to help on any fact in which he was fuppofed to be parti- cularly concerned. When thus taught, the young ftudent will fee not only our artifts but our poets, for want of a true idea of the antient alle- gories and machinery, grofsly defective in their allegorical representations he will fee them guilty of multiplicity, impropri- ety, and oblcurity, and often reprefenting perfons and things with fomething incon- fiftent with their nature ; he will fee the great Rubens himfelf, fo famous for allegories, painting Hope with her anchor on her moulder •, a lady with a fhip on her head ; Justice grafping a bundle of flames, with her fcales in the fame hand c . — He will fee even the divine Raphael reprefenting A- c See the author's remarks on the cieling at Whitehall and the Luxemburg gallery in the ap- pendix. policy P R E F A C E. polio, in his famous ParnaiTus, playing on a modern riddle. — He will fee, in Spenfer's Fairy Queen, (the work of our beft allegorift,) many inftances of his mix- ing Heathenifm and Chriftianity together; of his mifreprefenting the ancient allego- ries, and of his own being too compli- cated or over-done, and ftretched to an extravagant degree. — He will fee Dryden, one of our beft tranflators, without any au- thority, mifreprefenting, in his tranflation of Virgil, the perfons, attributes, drefs, and actions of the allegorical beings ; as Peace with wings — Proteus with grey hair — Cybele drawn by tygers, inftead of her lions. — He will fee him fall into the mo ft vulgar notions of the antient machinery, from his being unacquainted with the real defign of it, and the principle on which it was founded. If then our beft artifts, allegorifts, and tranflators, are fo defective in their alle- gorical fubjects, for want of a clear idea of the antient allegories and machinery, how necefiary is it that our youths at fchool mould be made acquainted, as early as pofllble, with a right notion of thefe 5 things f PREFACE. things ! by which means a folid founda- tion would be laid in their young minds for understanding the claflks for acquir- ing a true tafte for the beauties of poetry, painting, and fculpture and for enabling them to judge of the excellencies and defecls of our allegorifts, tranflators, and artifts. For thefe purpofes this abridgement is offered to all thofe who are concerned in the education of youth : being the flrft and only attempt (as hath been obferved) towards giving a true idea of the allego- ries and machinery of the antients, and an accurate and authentic defcription of the figures, attributes, and other appearances of the allegorical and moral beings received as deities among the Romans. In the courfe of this inquiry an account is given of a great number of the mo ft no- ted pictures, ftatues, gems, and medals, at Rome, Florence, &c. and not a few good fubjects are recommended to our modern artifts and painters from the defcriptions i in the old poets. There are alfo occafional hints at fome of the refemblances between the religion profeffed of old at Rome, and that which is pradifed there now, with a general PREFACE, general notion of the pagan religion as pro-> feiTed by the heathen world, and other cu- rious particulars. As the two former editions were de- figned for all perfons in general, and as this edition is adapted, in particular, for the ufe of fchools, it was thought proper to make the following alterations. 1. Such paiTages in the introduction as were deemed not to relate fo immediately to fchool-education, are omitted or con- tracted. 2. The Inquiry itfelf is enlarged and il- luftrated with 28 prints, taken from original antiques. 3. Several paflfages from the claflks re- ferred to in the notes are inferted in the ap- pendix, by way of fpecimen, for the fchool- boy to follow. 4. The judicious remarks on the defects of our modern artifts, allegorifts, and tranOators, are thrown into the appendix, as they are fitter to be read after the peru- fal of the Inquiry than before. Thefe re- marks are of great ufe towards forming a right judgement of the allegorical represen- tations PREFACE, tations of our artifls and poets and will be very ferviceable to the young ftudents in many refpedts, particularly the remarks on Dryden's tranflation of Virgil, if the fcholar compares the paffages referred to with the original. ERRATUM. P. ix. 1. 1 8. for received r^weavc^ A LIST of the ANTIQUES, and where they are placed and explained. th I. The Frontifpiece. Jupiter, in the Verofpi-palace at Rome, p. i. PI. II. facing p. 6. 1. Jupiter Capitolinus, from a medal of Vitellius, p. 5, 6. 2. The Winged Fulmen, on a fhield on the Antonine and Trajan pillars, p. 7. PI. III. p. 16. Venus of Medici. PL IV. p. 23. 1. Mars Gradivus, a Cornelian at Flo- rence, p. 23. 2. Mars defcending on Rhea Sylvia, a medal of Antoninus Pius, p. 23. . PI. V. p. 26. Apollo Belvidere. PI. VI. p. 37. 1. Diana Triformis, from Montfaucon., Vol. 1. pi. 90. p. 37. 2. Mercury flying, as in the Vatican manu- fcript, p. 38. PI. VII. p. 43. Farnese Hercules. PI. VIII. p. 66. 1. Heads of Bacchus, on a tree, a Cor- nelian of MafFei, p. 55. 2. Castor and Pollux, a medal in Oife- lius, p. 60. 3. Prudence, a medal of Gordianus Afri- canus, p. 64, 4. Justice, LIST of the ANTIQUES. 4. Justice, a medal of Galba, p. 64. 5. Fortitude, a medal of Adrian, p. 64. 6. Temperance, a medal in the Pifani col- lection, p. 67. PI. IX. p. 112. 1. Mercury's fword, or harpe', a cornelian at Florence, p. 38. 2. Hercules and Antaeus, in the palace of Pitti at Florence, p. 50. 3. Janus, a medal of Antoninus Pius, in Bartoli, p. 112. . 4. A God of winds, a relievo in the Capito- linegallwy, p. 119. PI. X. p. 132. 1. Juno drawn by peacocks, from a medal, p. 122. 2. Fame, a little brafs flatue at Florence, p. 126. 3. Neptune, a medal of Adrian, p. 129. 4. Venus Marina, a relievo in the Mattei- palace at Rome, p. 132. PL XT. p. 153. Atlas fupporting a globe, in the Farnefe pa- lace at Rome. PI. XII. p. 180. 1. The God of Sleep, or Somnus, a ftatue of Maffei's, p. 166. 2. Sisyphus, Tantalus, and Ixion, a re- lievo in the Barbarini palace at Rome, p. 180. PI. XIII. p. 181. The Farnefe Celestial Globe. POLYMETIS ABRIDGED: O R An I N QJJ I R Y concerning the Agreement between the Works of the Roman Poets, and the Remains of the Antient Artists, THE INTRODUCTION. TH E principal defign of the author in this Inquiry was, to compare the defcriptions and expreflions in the Latin poets any way relating to the Roman deities, with the allegorical repre- fentations of the fame by the painters and fculp- tors, in their pictures, ftatues, medals and gems, B in [ ii 1 in order to illuflrate them mutually from one another. a As the author has confined himfclf to the Roman poets only ; and as there is a great deal of difference in the authority of a poet near the fecond Punic war and one of the Auguftan age, he has prefixed to his Inquiry, in order to fettle the credit which ought to be given to each poet, an account of the rife, growth and decline of poetry, painting and fculpture among the Romans, wherein he gives the characters of the Latin poets and their works, from Ennius down to Juvenal. SECT. I. The Growth and Decline of Poetry among the ROMANS. THERE are three ages of the Latin poetry. The firft age may be dated, as it was by the Romans themfelves, from the time of a The author took the pains to read over all the R.oman poets, from the fragments of Livius Andronicus, to the fatires of Juve- nal} and to mark down the moft ftriking paftages relating to the allegorical beings received as deities among the Romans, He alfo Increafed his ftock of quotations from feveral profe-writers, from Varro down to Macrobius. LIVIUS. [ Hi ] LIVIUS ANDRONICUS. Livius was the firft Latin poet of whom there are any remains. The firft kind of poetry that met with any fuccefs among the Romans, was that for the ftage. They were very religious, and ftage-plays in thofe days made no inconfiderable part in their public devotions. Livius's firft play (and it was the firft written play that ever appeared at Rome, whence Horace perhaps calls him fcriptor, 3. ii. ep. i. v. 61.) was acled in the 514th year from the building of the city ; fo long was it before poetry had made any progrefs among the Romans. Livius is noted for the firft, rather than for a good poet, and was the only one for the ftage til! Naevius arofe. N £ V I U S, ENNIUS. Njevius, befides his plays, ventured upon a historical poem on the firft Carthaginian war, in which he is faid to have ferved. Ennius followed his fteps in this as well as in the dramatic way. He celebrated the victories of Scipio Africanus (Hor. 1. iv. od. 8.) and com- pofed the annals of Rome in heroic verfe 3 and died at the 12th book in his 67th year. Theie [ » 3- Thefe three were actors as well as poets, and feem rather to have wrote whatever was wanted for the ftage, than to have confulted their own genius. After the fecond Punic war and the conquefts in Greece, the Roman dramatic poets began to act with more judgment. They had the benefit of the excellent Greek patterns, and formed themfelves on thofe models. Hor. 1. ii, cp. I, v. 163. PLAUTUS. C/ECILIUS. Plautus was the firft that confulted his own genius, and confined hinfelf to comedy, for which he was fitted by nature. Indeed his comedy is of a ruder kind, his jefts are often rough, and his wit coarfe j but there is a ffrength and fpirit in him that makes him read with pleafure. Cjecilius followed his example in confulting his own genius, but improved their comedy fo much beyond him, that Cicero (Brut. c. 74.) . counts him the belt perhaps of all their comic writers. But this was not for his language, but for the dignity of his characters, or the ftrength of his fentiments; TERENCE. A F R A N I U 5. Terence firft appeared when Caecilius was in high reputation. It is feen by his plays to what exactnefs and elegance the Roman comedy was arrived [ v I arrived in his time. There is a beautiful fimpli- city throughout all his works : his fpeakers fay juft what they fhould fay, and no more. The {lory is always going on, and goes on juft as it ought. The Roman language in his hands feems to be almoft a hundred years forwarder than the times he lived in. His moft ufual method, it feems, was to take his plans and characters from the Greek comic poets, efpecially from Menan- der. Afranius was regarded even in the Auguftari age as the moft exact imitator of Menander. He owns he had no reftraint in copying him or any other Greek comic poet, wherever they fet him a good example. His ftories and perfons were Roman, as Terence's were Grecian. This was deemed fo material a point that it made two dif- ferent forts of comedy. Thofe on a Greek ftory (wherein Terence excelled) were called p alii at a y and thofe on a Roman, togata ; wherein Afra- nius was unrivalled, and therefore the lofs of his works is greatly to be lamented. P A C U V I U S. ACCIUS. Pacuvius, a cotemporary of Terence, and Accius of Afranius, about the fame time, car- ried tragedy as far towards pci feci ion as it ever arrived in Roman hands* It is remarkable in Pacuvius that he was alraoft as eminent for paint- ing as for poetry. Plin. 1. 35. c. 4, G 3 Accius t vi ] Accius began to publifh when Pacuvius was leaving off. His language was not fo fine, nor his verfes fo well turned, as his predeceflbr's. L U C I L I U S. For more than a hundred years, the ftage was aimed the fole province of the Roman poets, but afterwards fatire, a new fpecies of poetry, fprung up, the produce of the old comedy. En- nius and others had attempted it j but it was fo altered and improved by Lucilius, by the lights he borrowed from the old Athenian comedy, that he was called the inventor of it. Hor. 1. i. fat. 4. v. 7. LUCRETIUS. Lucretius not long after joined poetry to philofophy : where his fubjeel: gives him leave, he difcovers a great deal of fpirit, and in all his di- gressions he appears to have been of a more poetical turn than Virgil himfelf ; which is partly owned in the fine compliment Virgil pays him in his Georgics, Geo. ii. v. 492. His fubjedt often forces him to go on heavily for an hundred lines together : but wherever he breaks out, he breaks out like lightning from a cloud, all at once, with force and brightnefs. CATULLUS. [ vii ] CATULLUS. Catullus and Lucretius wrote when letters in general began to flourifh at Rome much more than ever they had done. Catullus began to fhew the Romans the excellence of the Greek Lyric poets. He was admired in all the different ways of writing he attempted. His odes perhaps are the leaft valuable parts of his works. The fatiri- cal Itrokes in his epigrams are very fevere, and his defcriptions in his idylliums very piclurefque. He paints ftrongly, but with more force than elegance. Of thefe the firft age of the Roman poetry may be faid to confift ; an age more remarkable for ftrength than for refinement in writing. All that remains of this period are the twenty plays of Plautus and the fix of Terence, the philofo- phical poem of Lucretius, and the poems of Ca- tullus. Of all the reft there is nothing left but fuch paflages as are quoted by the antient writers, and particularly by Cicero, in whofe time it was the fafhion to cry up the old poets. Horace, in his epiftle to Auguftus, combated this high no- tion of the antients as a vulgar error, and his character of them feems a little too fevere. The fecond, or flour ifting age of the Roman poetry, begins with the reign of Augustus, who encouraged the improvement of all the polite arts and elegances of life. He had a mimfter too, B 4 Maecenas, I v ™ J Maecenas, who admitted the beft poets into a very great mare of friend (hip and intimacy' with him. In the head of this lift ftands VIRGIL. Virgil foon grew the moft applauded writer for genteel paftorals b ; then publifhed the moft beautiful and correct poem on agriculture that ever was penned in the Roman language; and laft of all, he undertook the /£neid, a poem that has been highly applauded in all ages, from its firft appearance to this day; and though- left unfinimed, has been reckoned as much fu- perior to all other epic poems among the Romans, as Homer's is among the Greeks. It preferves to us more of the religion of the Romans than all the other Latin poets, except Ovid ; and gives us the forms and appearances of their deities as ftrongly, as if v;e had fo many pictures of them drawn by the bdt hands, in the Auguftan age. c The t> All paftoral writers may be divided into two clafTes, the rural and the ruftic ; or, if you will, the genteel and the homely.. See Hor. 1. i. fat. 10. v. 45. where molle feems to be meant of the fweetnefs of Virgil's verification in his paftorals, as facetut denotes the genteelnefs. e There are two celebrated old manufcript Virgils in the Vatican library at Rome, with paintings in them, relating to fome of the moft remarkable paffages. The more antient of the two is generally thought to be of Conftantine's time, by the learned in the ages of manufcripts; but as the pi&ures are evidently of too. [ ix ] The ftrength of his imagination, as to this particular, has been commended by fome of the an dents thcmfelves, though in general that is not his character, To much asexa&nefs. He was certainly the molt correct poet even of his time, and it is as certain that there is but little of inven- tion (much lefs than perhaps is imagined) in his iEneid. Almoft all the little facts in it are built on hiflory ; and even as to particular lines, no one perhaps ever borrowed more from the former poets, inferting often whole verfes from Ennius and others. He minded not the obfoletenefs of their fly le, for he was particularly fond of their old language, and, doubtlefs, inferted more anti- quated words than can now be difcovered. Judg- ment is his ciftinguifliing character; whatever he borrowed he had the fkill to make his own, by fo artfully receiving it into his work, that it looks all of a piece. d HORACE. Horace was firft recommended to Maecenas by Virgil. No man was fitter for a court where wit was fo particularly encouraged, than Horace,, who had himfelf a great deal, and was well ac- B 5 quainted- too good a manner for that age, they are fuppofed, by the Left judges, to have been copied' from fome others of the moft flouriih- ing ages. Our author, therefore, has not fcrupled to make ufe of rhefe pictures in the courfe of his work. d Our author has largely proved that the Mr.eid is a political poem in fupport of the new monarchical government undec Auguftus. See Pclym. p. 18. [ X ] quainted with mankind. He has been generally moft celebrated for his Lyric poems, in which he far excelled all the Roman poets, and rivalled the Greek, which feems to be the height of his am- bition. He is alfo famous for refining fatire, and bringing it from the coarfenefs and harfhnefs of Lucilius, to that genteel eafy manner which per- haps none but he in all ages fmce has ever pof- feffed. As the antients fay nothing of his epifties, poffibly they palled under the fame name, perhaps that of fermoncs. They are generally written in a ffyle approaching to that of converfation, and are fo much alike, that feveral of the fatires might as well be called epifties, as feveral of his epifties have the fpirit of fatire in them. In thefe epifties and fatires it is that he {hews his ex- cellent talent for critieifm, efpecially in his long 'epiftle to Augustus, and in that to Pifo, commonly called his Art of Poetry. They abound in ftrokes, which fhew his great knowledge oi mankind, and. in that pleafing way of teaching philofcpiiv, of laughing away vice, of in- fmuating virtue. They may ferve, as much as ajmoft any writings, to make men wifer and better. He was in general an honeft man him- felf 3 without one ill-natured vice about him. TIBULLUS. PROPER TIUS. In the fame court flourifhed Tibullus, who is kindly mentioned by Horace, 1. i. od. 33. 1. i. cp. 4. He was deemed by their belt judges, and C xi 1 is, the moft exact and beautiful writer of love- verfes and elegies among the Romans. His compliment on MelTala (the only poem he wrote of elegiac verfe) plainly fhews, he was neither defigned for heroics nor panegyrics. Elegance is his