. /» rjjuck M*C-) p **+7lcic*J E B O RA CU M: OR THE HISTORY AND ANTiaUITIES OF T H E I R From its Original to the Present Times. Together with the Hiftory of the Cathedral Church, AND THE Lives of the Archbishops of that SEE, From the firft Introduction of CHRISTIANITY into the Northern Parts of this Island, to the prefent State and Condi¬ tion of that Magnificent Fabrick. Collett eel from Authentick Manufcripts, Publick Records, Ancient Chronicles, and Modern Htflorians. And illuftrated with COPPER PLATES. In Two BOOKS. By FRANCIS DRAKE, of the City of TOR K, Gent. P. R. S. and Member of the Society of Antiquaries in London. Nee manet ut fuerat , nec formam fervat eandem , Sed tamen iff a eadem ejl. Ovib.Met. Lib. XV. Sed tamen ipfa eadem ejl. LONDON, Printed by William Bowyer for the Author. MDCCXXXVI RIGHT HONOURABLE Sir RICHARD BOYLE, Earl of BURLINGTON, Earl of C ORKE, Vifcount D UNGARVON and Kynalmachy in Ireland, Baron Clifford of Londes burgh, AND Knight of the moft noble Order of the GARTER, My LORD, T HE author of this work prefents it to your patronage, as to a perlon every way qualified for an add refs of this nature. For, where fhould the hiftory of an ancient logins. dedication. ancient Ro?na?i city, in Britain, find greater fa¬ vour, or meet with a better reception, than from a nobleman, whole particular genius, al- molt, fpeaks him of Roman extraction ? Dedications, my Lord, are in our days fo commonly proftituted to venal purpofes, that, they look more like humble petitions for cha¬ rity than proper addrelfes. hefides, the pa¬ tron’s genius or tafte is rarely con halted in this fort of application.-1 hope I am free from any imputation of that kind. The frrong re¬ lation, and attachment, your Lordlhip bears to the noble fubjeCt I have chofen, calls loudly for this publick declaration of it. i The illultrious name of Clifford, the blood of which noble houfe now runs in your veins, for many ages, has been familiar to Tork. Nor, is the name of Boyle a ftranger to our records 5 your Lordfhip’s great grand¬ father, the then earl of Burlington, having done this city an extraordinary honour in bearing the office of its recorder. -Befides, 1 can with pleafure fay, the places of your Lordlhip’s EngliJJj titles make no fmall figure in this very hiltory; having been, indubitably, one of them a Roman port; and, the other, your paternal and favourite feat, a Roman ftation in our neighbourhood. For 4 DEDICATION. For yourfelf, befides the title of governour of Tork, and its peculiar diftrict the Jin fly , which you have born 5 you have ftill a much nearer affinity to it, by accepting of a diploma for a free citizen in that body. And, when I mention the noble edifice, defigned and finilhed under your particular care and direction, not to lpeak of your generous and liberal donations to it, I mult farther fay that it will be a lad¬ ing monument of the great regard and value you pay to this ancient city. For Tork, by your means, is now poffelled of a ftru&ure, in a truer and nobler tafte of architecture, than, in all probability, the Roman Eboracum could ever boalt of. Your Lordlhip’s great knowledge in this art, foars up to the Juguflan age and ftyleand, that Pretorian palace, once in old Eboracum, made ever memorable for the re- fidence and deaths of two Roman emperors, and in all likelihood, for the birth of a third, mull' if now Handing, have given place to your Egyp¬ tian hall in our prefent Tork. Your Lordfhip’s tafte in hiftory and antiqub ties, as well as in the liberal arts and fcieuces, is too well known to need any comment. And, when I inform the world that I have your per- miffion to addrefs this work to you, I dare lay that I fhall readily be believed. You did me the honour to fee and approve of my firft a draught. 4 DEDICATION. draught, or fcheme of this great work. A noble defign, though drawn by your Lordlhip, may be ill executed. Yet, howfoever mean this performance may be found, the fubjed it treats of muft be allowed worthy the patronage of the Earl of Burlington. My Lord, Your other fhining charaderifticks in life are now before me- But, to the prelent age it would be faying nothing to tell what every one is acquainted with. And, fhould I pre¬ tend tofpeak to futurity, your own pencil, and the works proceeding from it, will leave no¬ bler proofs of your exalted genius than my poor pen can draw. Yet, give me leave to fpeak to you, as the poet did of old to another truly noble patron, Dii till divitias dederint, and, what is, by fir, the greater bleffing, Artem Fru- endi. For, if the right ufe of riches confifts in the exercife of all moral, focial, and bene¬ ficent virtues to our fellow creatures, both equal and inferiour to us in fortune; if, along with titles, honours, and eftates, we meet with humanity, good nature, and affability to all mankind ; and if we find riches laid out in a delicacy of tafte, fuperiour to any thing feen before in this Bland ; then, we may, furely, pronounce the perfon fo bleffed, every way qualified to enjoy them. T HAT DEDICATION. That your Lordfhip may long continue, what you now really are, a lingular ornament to this country, is the hearty and lincere wilh of My LORD . Tour Lordjhip's MoH obedient, and Moft obliged Humble Servant , London, Auguft i, J 73 6 - FRANCIS DRAKE. KS53 /. s. d. T HE Number of Sheets propofed for this WORK? _ was 12 j, befides Copper Plates, at two Guineas, C 220 The Work being encreafed to 200 Sheets and a half,? the additional 7 5 Sheets and a half at 2 d. per Sheet, > 0127 according to the Propofals, amount to - - \ Total for each Book in fmall Paper 2 14 7 The Price of the large is double the fmall Paper. N. B. The Author, notwithftanding the Expence he has been at in engraving a much greater Number of Copper Plates than was at firft propofed, is willing to reduce the Price to two Guineas and a half for the fmall Paper, and five Guineas for the large, to his Subscribers. the PREFACE. PrefMi to a bo°k is fifajhionable and fi particular an ornament to it, that without one, or at leaf an introduction, the work would look like a new built houfe, to which the architect had made no entrance. But t houS j th l s ' many ttm fi necejfiary exordium, to a book, mull, according to ns hand Tl/t.h TfT / J ^ the W thin Z thc ^thorputs h‘s hand to, of the whole performance. I own that I am firry lean no way avoid fuch a preamble-, there being many andfirong reafins to urge me to it ■ eUe I(hZd willingly, beg to be excufid- the itch of fribbling, with me, having.Veen fufficUnt- h abated by what I have already gone through. Befdes, as I declare I hardly niyfilf ever read a preface m my life, I can Jcarcely exfeCl that any other tier,on Jhould ever take the pains to read mine. Tet, as there niay be fever al that wait for and will take more notice of this preceding than of its confequential part to fuch 1 addrefi myfilf-, and Jhall declare the reafins, jijl mentioned, in as brief a manner induce n 2 re J‘ hCjU, ’ jeaWllliear , ° rth 'P™ °f" tired writer will necejjarily el F *‘. 1 ‘ hlnk U f r -°f er t0 & ive f mc account to the pubtick what were the motives that put me upon writing on afubjeClfi very foreign jo the profefion I was TroZht "fr thofe being fmewhat unaccountable, I Jhall not wajlemuch time in jhe dtfquifition. I foal only jay, that, being bred a Jurgeon, and, poMly allowel feme Jhare of knowledge m my profefion, yet Hiftory and Anujuiw fe always if*"- fry'] U'nojl, as many books fubiijhcj fsbfifi if the body as there areof theJoul; and the practice of the former, both externally and in ernally, ,s made fi evident and clear, by them, jo the meaneft capZitythat in reading a common Difpenfitonr only, we may imagine that no body has occl„ to fj, Z 7 777 em 7 d P f ured ’ in Mlici Advertifementt, that Aid ZfZlZ/ 7'- thedumbta 'f and the lame throw away their cru ch s by nlfn’Zf 7 7- ,n f , Z , f lCant a Pf'‘ cat ‘°ns and remedies. In an age like this nZdd he r b !? U S ht f°J uch « perfection as even to work miracles ubon nature I f.ould be highly prejumptuous to pretend to exceed. Betides T nm r Uf- r. / • , U.SfiffifZt Silt Iff nous traCl willJhew, I jud^e if I know „„„ S' J Ceedtd ’ the following volumi- ssismimmmm •» ^ they PREFACE. ?/jt’y &«gw / $«?. My acquaintance and correjpondents all kno'W me to be commu¬ nicative enough, both in epi/lolary and common conjervation ; having been ever of the fame mind with old Perfius, in this, that Scire tuum nihil eft, nifi te fcire hoc fciat alter. Having premifed thus much, I think it further proper to fay fomcthing on the nature of the JiibjeSi I have chofen, and to point out who they were who have gone before me in this traSl, and from whom my collections have been a?iy ways bettered or enriched. I apprehend the hijlory of any very remarkable ancient city, or pecu¬ liar comity in Britain, is enough to exercife the genius of the able ft hiftorian or anti¬ quary. Andyet I am well aware that the hijlory of any particular place, or local hijlory, meets with no fuch tncouragementfrom the world as the more general hi- Jlorians are honoured with. IVe have an inftance before our eyes of an hifory of Eng¬ land taking a prodigious run ; and making its way, at no Jmall expence to the buyers, almojl, into every family in the kingdom. And, will in time be as much engrafted there, made familiar, and had in as great regard as the old family Bible. Whilft fuch an hijlory as mine is mufl lag behind, be raifed by the heavy method of fnbfcription, thrift into the prejs and dragged through it by all the force and frength that the author, or his friends, can apply to the engine. 'This difeouragement from the publick does not in the leaf abate in me a value for local hifories. We all know that the hijlory of a hero or warrior, of a fatefman, and fometimes, even, of a private perfon is frequently full of uncommon events or accidents though deduced down in no longer a J'cries than the fhort courfe of human life. By how much more therefore jnufl the hijlory offuch a city as this exceed in matter, could we, as in the former caj'e, as clearly difeern it through a feries of Jo many revolutions of things and per- fons in the courje of fo many ages f And yet, after all, I muf own that to a perfon who is ?iot a tolerable mafer of general hijlory, this particular one will be found to have lefts Jolt, be taftlefs to him, or unintelligible. EN . To mention the writers who have gone before me on this fubjeSf, I fall here take notice of few or none, in a general way, but, that honour to our country, the great Mr. Camden. And, indeed, the city of York is much indebted to the memo¬ ry of that able hiftorian and antiquary for the clear and Juccintt account he has left us of it. As he feems pleafed with the Jiibjedl, fo he has done it a great deal of ju- ftice-, and, conftdcririg the extenftvenefs of his whole defign, York has as great a jhare in his work as London itj'elf ; which T amfure is no fmall compliment to our city. His learned tranftator and continuator, the prefent bijhop of London, Jays, that he has little to add to fo particular an account as the hiftorian has given j and only wijhes “ that this ancient and noble city may yet receive a clearer luftre from a “ manujeript hijlory of its antiquities wrote by fir Thomas Widdrington, fometime « recorder of York , which upon Jome dijguft he prohibited the publication oft ” The learned writer adds, that the original manujeript is now in the Fairfax family. What other general hiftorians I have been indebted to, are all mentioned in the body of the work, as the Jeveral quotations are made from them. as And now, [nice fir Thomas Widdringtonh name is on the carpet, I muft firft G_ own my obligations to that gentleman, who was the firft, that I know of, who un¬ dertook to write in a particular way the hijlory of this city. The great and Jirange feenes of life fir Thomas run through is not Jo much my province to write of ; who will, may meet with Jome account of this gentleman in Anthony Woodh Athenian Oxonienles, and in a late odlavo book publiftoed un¬ der the title of the life and death of Oliver Cromwell. This writer in all pro¬ bability began to make his collections Jor his hijlory in king Charles the firft's time, when he was recorder of York. For in a J'peech to that monarch, at his coming to the city, in the year 1639 , he pays a ftrained compliment to the king oj its being more honoured by his having been duke of York, than by the refidence and deaths of emperors * , which Jhews that he had then read fomcthing of' the antiquities oj it. The civil wars intervening, in which our author could not be unconcerned, his hi¬ jlory Jeans only to be finijhed in the Halcyon days, for his party, that enfued. And it muft be after the Reftoration that he Jent the city word he intended to print and dedicate his elaborate performance to them. 1 prej'ume he Jent them al- * Seethe fpeeih, />. 136. print PREFACE. fo a copy of what he intended to fay to the mdgifiracy , whom he propofd to dddrefs it to ; elfe the anfwer, which isfmart enough, could not have retorted fo jlrongh upon it *. This rebuff, we are told, was the reajon, though he did not, as fir Walter Rawleigh is Jaid to do, burn his manufcript, that a prohibition was laid upon his defcendants ever to publifli it. I cannot attejl the truth of this, which, if Jo, in all probability might be found in his will, now in the prerogative-office of Canterbury ■- but the circumjiance is not J'o material to me as to occajion the trouble of a fearcb for it. Sir Thomas had married a fifier of lord Thomas Fairfax, and left behind him four daughters , all well befiowed in marriage to as many confiderable families in this kingdom. By which former alliance and the great reJpeB he bore to the lord Fairfax, it is very poffible that he gave or left the original manufcript to that noble lord. Two copies of which are, as I am informed, one of them in the Fairfax of Menfton family, and the other in that of Shaftoe of the biffoprick of Durham; which lafi had married one of fir Thomas Widdrington’r daughters. I fay, I am informed, becau/e 1 never could get a fight of either copy, though I once took great pains to procure the favour. That in the Fairfax family being kept lub figillo; as bifiop Nicholfon rightly exprefes it in his Engliih hiftorical library. 1 was lejs anxious about the matter, when, by the indulgence of the city, an order was made to fuffer me to inJpeSt their records, and copy what I pleafed f or my book. By this means another copy of this noted manufcript of fir Thomas'* fell into my hands. How, or when, the city procured it, 1 cannot fay, but I know it to be a true one, though the ignorance of the tranfcriber, in the Latin tongue, fuffered him to make feveral miftakes in copying that language. How I came to be certain that this is a true copy was by an accident that I never expeBed to meet with, and is this. The reverend Dr. Vernon oj St. George’* Bloom (bury hearing of my dejign, fince I came to London, inf ormed Mr. Gyles the bookfeiler, one of the perfons mentioned in my propofals to take in fubferiptions for me, of a manufcript in the hands of fir Robert Smyth of Bury in Suffolk, Bart, which he J'aid related to the hijiory and an¬ tiquities oj York, I was Jurprized at this, when it was told me-, thinking I had then feen every thing of that kind which it was pqjfible for me to get at. Upon ap¬ plication to the doBor he was Jb good as -to procure me the loan of the manufcript-, but 1 was much more furprized to find it fir Thomas Widdrington’* work-, and •what is yet more extraordinary, I dare aver that this is the very original which he himfelf intended for the prefs. The reafon which makes me fo pofitive in it, is, that though this manufcript was wrote by fame amanuenfis, yet it is interlined 'and noted in the margin by his own hand in many places ; fever al things, and thofe ex- preffwns chiefly which bore any thing hard upon the church or monarchy, are jlYuck out and expunged: Oj which 1 could give from the manufcript many inftances were it neceffary to do it. At the head of an appendix to the book is this note on the margin , I purpofe not to add this appendix to the book when it is printed; in re¬ gard the appendix is imperfect. There are other references and notes put in by the author, which Jhew, moji evidently, that this was the very book which he himfelf drefftd up and put the lafi hand to for the prefs. On the title page of the copy in the city * cujlody is a remark made that the author did expunge feveral things jrom his manujeript, as the reader willJ’ee at p. lxxxiv. of my appendix, where I have cau- fed the title, his dedication, and the city 1 s anfwer to be all printed together. And there it is /'aid to be in the pof'ejfion of the lord Fairfax. If this was Thomas lord Fairfax, his tffeBs, library, 6c c. were all fold and difperfed at his death-, jb that this manufcript might come, at lafi, into the hands of Jb diligent a colieBor as the late Mr. Richardlon apothecary in London. Sir Robert Smyth bought it at Mr. Ofborn’* fale of that gentleman 1 s library, about a year or two ago ; which is all the intelligence I could team about it. After what I have thought neceffary here to fay, it may eafily be believed that I have had all the affiflan.ee which the hijiory of this city wrote by fir Thomas Wid- drington could give me. It is true, 1 have not followed his method, becauje I did not approve of it ; for which reafon what I have thought fit to extraB from him lyes mixed and interfperfed with mine, and others, throughout the whole performance. But I am pofitive that 1 have not made ufe of one quotation from this work with¬ out a fir T.W .to it-, either in the body of my work, or in a marginal note. * See the-dedication and anfwer at page lxxxiv. and lxxxv. of the appendix. Sir preface. S ! r Thomas, as I have [aid, finijhed his hijiory about the year i 6 co, or 60; as -j J ere ! , t/j!n Sj ,n h‘ s kook may bejkewn ; particularly his mentioning. Mrs Mid dleton s hojpita ,n Skeldergate, which was built and endowed the fame years ' This gentleman had been'.then along while recorder of the city, by which means 'he had libei t\ tomJpcSt the records and extrali what he wanted for his u[e This with h,s own Jhil ,n hisprofe/fion, in which I have heard he was very eminent, made him very capable to write the law part of his hijiory , and indeed it is that par, I am the moft indebted to him for. Though what l have given on that head is not all nor near all, taken from his collelfions. Sir Thomas was returned and [at in the LongParl'ament/or the town ./Berwick; but in that memorable Convention, which put she faff of the protcllorfhip into Cromwell's hands, and would, if he had do Jired it have Jet the crown on his head, he ferved Jor the city of York. He was chofen jpeaker of this meeting and in a moft Jblemn and religious form, and with a Jet Jpeech to the purpofe, mvefled his highnefs with his robes and honours It was at this time that bang ,n great power and favour, he might have done much more profitable things for the city than writing a hijiory of it. Tet I do not find any thing attempted by him ,n that way. This muft dijguft his fellow citizens, and they feemed only to wait a pair opportunity to tell him as much of it. In the bird pari,ament at the Reiteration > Thomas was again returned Jor this city but I fuppofe Ins intereft here funk veryJbon after, for he tod his feat the next, and threw up his recorderjhip the fame year, viz. 1661 . It was about this time, no doubt that the letter was Jent him relating to the publication of his book-, which though anonymou s, he muft needs know from whence it came, and by whole direction it was wrote. The /ling in the tail of it J'ujficiently Jhews their refentment againfi him ■ by pointing out to him their wants, which he muft have been acquainted with and probably, might have remedied in the height of his power. Thus much I have thought fit to fay relating to fir Thomas Widdrington and his mamjenpt hijiory of York. I could not well fay lefs on a predeceffor of fuch uh common merit and eminence. And I Jhould have been thought very lame and de Jeltive, in my own account, if I could not have affured the fublick, 'in this manner that the original, or a true copy of that manufeript, had faffed my hands What remains, is only to recommend it to the prefent proprietors of the other copies that they would print it ; face one of them has been offered to Jale, andfmee no injunSfion from the author obliges them now to the contrary. The world would then judge whether what I have alledged in this matter is true or not-, and whether I have not done juft:ce in this work to the memory of fir Thomas Widdrington. Dons- During the time the former author was compiling his particular hijiory of York the moft induflrious Mr. Dodfworth was colle Aing and tranferibing his many volu¬ minous trails, of eccleftaftical and monaftical antiquities, which now enrich the Bodleyan library at Oxford. One volume of thefe collettions he deftgned Jhould be called Monalticon Boreale *; being particularly intended for York, ard the old Northumbrian divifton. At the publication of Mr. Dodfworth's tranferipts fir William Dugdale altered this method-, but they /land fo in his own manuferipts at Oxford, ljuft mention this indefatigable collellor, becaufe I have been indebted to him for many ufeful mftruments in my eccleftaftical part, 'and fo muft every hftorian cl/e, that pretends to write on this fubjeS, or a more general account of the church or dtoceje of York.. Beftdes, Mr. Dodfworth was almoft a native of this city, be¬ ing born in our neighbourhood -)-; and his father was regfter to our eccleftaftical courts. Nor muft the famous Tower be forgot in which that great magazine of antiquities was depofited; and from which he bad juft made his tranferipts when tke tower and they were blown ufby the rebel Scots and made one heap of ruins.