THE TOUR WITH DETAILS OF MATCHES PLAYED 1886 Argosy” Press: Demerara CLASS BOOK THE LIBRARY OF HAVERFORD COLLEGE THE GIFT OF S MO. ACCESSION NO. 19 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2020 with funding from Getty Research Institute https://archive.org/details/tourofwestindianOOunse WEST INDIANS, 1886. (CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES TOUR.) r-t- _ 2 3 3 p —, 3 xj <"+- si o. 3 nP IL a> P ill 3 3 £- rt- O _ n 3 O: - n s **♦. S- 5 or O o § 3 . >£L 3 n pt> : J S-o p n h 1 3. 3 S* ft. 2 8 rsoHOK 2 2 a 2 £ »L X* ^ ° * ^ O 2.3 < o o Q-; p ^ X «-» ^ r-r P>nP< p^oO^p 2 V * (t p 3 o’ 3 3 'r' x S <*> «&- Co O o "O o 3 pd 3 r-t- C/» CO 22 W > K p o 3 S- 3 ? 5 . < 3 3 3 o o o ~ Slg .3 § 1-^-0 2> p p r z k co>> v. ^ c c - - „ OJ M w -p. tg ~ fp 9? F? j^> PP M rr *o p. o\co S co T3 ££ n> O 3 3 r-t- «-t- 0 2 3 p p ra>HHOg o 3 o o 2: o W CL 3 3 3-3 3 3 oo£ 3 - 2 3 3 3 5 3 3 O «-t- rt- p fl> OO p a T3 p 3 3- PD *-< 0) " 2 - p" n> cl CO > CO > 22 c - 22 - - - c * T3 r-t “ - - w v H* to to (0 m o\ O ~ InU O 00 »9? PP P? PP PP 00 „ _ to to to « *-* On 4^ - VO 00 00 on 3- PD 3 ^E- p - v: re CL MMvJOi h 4 ^ 4 * 4 ^ 4 ^ 4 ^ 05 4^ -< CP ON to 00 ON ON 05 GO On VO o eH ►-< 05 VO •“« Ln On ON -• *-< H Vl VI ID ^ O Ln hh 05 VO o VO co : o • h 05 K) ~ 0 \ H K 3 Co w Ln o to On On * 4 - ; to . * * On On 05 CO P P s 3 3 to ►* 00 — 4* to VO O O'd O' H Oi vj »-• h vj 05 05 O to 05 4^ Cn Ln On 05 4^ 4^ O •O T3 O 3 PC 3 * * ^ 4** *-< 4l. ih p to P CO (On 3 ON 3 0 * 5* 3* Is- * * *1 3 S. 3 O 3 3* ?r 3 3 PD 3* 3 3 c/> crq Oq PD <"»■ e-t- (/) tl CL CL 3 V) ?r 3 PD Xfi r-t- • V2 3 5’ <5rq l/) CO (/) - CO 2 C/3 05^ »» COCO < CO to * 3 *^ 0 « tv a >« 9*3 Co * ON 3 PP 05 VO 2-3 3 < 'O- CL *-t 3 3 c/» in CL ‘ 3 3 J 3 Crq v> PP •— 4* to ►i 3 3 Visit of West Indian Gentlemen to Canada and the United States. RESULT OF MATCHES. MATCHES PLAVED 1 3 : WON 6 ; DRAWN 2 \ LOST 5 . 86 BATTING AVERAGES. Names. Matches bat¬ ted in. Innings com¬ menced. Times not out. Times, How out. Largest In¬ nings. Total runs scored. Average runs per innings. Bowled. Caught. L. B. W. Hit wkt Run out. Stump’d. 1. Jack Lees. 13 23 2 9 II I _ 47 466 22'4 2. E. N. Marshall 10 17 1 11 4 - - I - 47 231 147 3. E. M. Skeete. 11 20 1 8 9 - - 2 - 32 245 12-17 4. W. H. Farqu’son. 13 23 - 10 9 - - 3 1 55 265 11' 12 5. J. M. Burke. 12 19 6 4 6 - - I 2 45 136 io"6 6. G. Wyatt. 10 18 I 7 6 3 - - 1 64 166 9' 1 3 7. Percy Isaacs. 8 13 1 4 4 2 - 2 - 21 88 7'4 8. R. H. Stewart. 13 22 - 10 9 - - 1 2 1 7 146 6-14 9. A. W. Swain. 7 11 I 5 5 - - - - 27 54 5 - 4 10. T. S. Skeete. 7 13 3 4 5 - - I - *19 53 5'3 11. Leo. Isaacs. 10 l 7 2 9 4 - - 2 - *26 7 i 411 12. Louis Kerr. 8 14 1 6 7 - 12 61 49 13. W. O. Collymore. 6 10 2 4 4 - - - - 12 35 43 14. L. R. Fyfe . 13 22 3 6 13 — - - 8 61 3'4 * Means not out. Summary .—14 men played in 242 innings.—“ Not Outs”, numbered 34 — 218 complete innings for a total of 2,078 runs ; average per man per innings 9-116. 97 were bowled 96 ,, caught 6 ,, Leg before 13 ,, Run out 6 ,, Stumped 318 87 BOWLING AVERAGES. Names. Matches bowled in. No. of overs bowled Maiden overs Runs scored. How taken. Total wickets taken. Average runs per wicket. Bowled. Caught. L. B. W. "a. £ GO W. H. Farquharson. 13 386 1 iS2 56 s 34 25 1 I 61 9 - i6 R. H. Stewart. 12 232 72 397 22 12 ... 8 42 9-19 }. M. Burke. 12 487 2 214 651 29 35 1 ..» 65 IO'I T. S. Skeete. 3 10 3 12 I • • . • • • ... 1 12* Jack Lees. 11 I 77 3 47 339 8 7 ... 4 19 i7'i6 E. N. Marshall. S 49 19 73 1 I I .. • 3 24 i Leo Isaacs. 3 22 7 42 I .. . . . . . .. I 42 - A. W. Swain. 3 33 13 60 ... ... ... ... 0 ... Wide Balls: —Skeete, I ; Farquharson, i ; Burke, 2. =4. No Balls: —None. Summary :—8 men bowled 1397 2 overs (of which 527 were maidens) and took 192 wickets for a total of 2,139 runs. Average runs per wicket 1 r27- 88 SUNDRY SCRAPS OF INFORMATION. Wicket-keeping. L. L. Kerr, 5 matches P. Isaacs 5 „ G. Wyatt 3 „ Professionals against us. Lacey for Montreal Morley for Merion Butler Stumped. Caught. ... 5 13 = 18 ... 5 6 «= 11 •••3 2-5 Bradley for Belmont Chambers for Longwood Island. for Staten Highest wins. West Indians.—An innings and 142 runs, v. Halifax Wanderers. Opponents.—An innings and 88 runs, Germantown. Highest scores in one innings West Indians.—319, v Halifax Wanderers. Opponents....—310, Germantown C.C. Smallest scores in one innings. West Indians.—36, v. Merion C.C. Opponents....—23, Longwood C.C. Highest individual scores in an innings. West Indians. — Mr. G. Wyatt 64, v. Young America. Opponents....—Mr. W. C. Morgan 85, for Germantown. Extras. West Indians gave away 196. Opponents „ „ 181. Total runs (including extras). West Indians.—2,350 for 224 wickets, average io'iio. Opponents....—2,331 for 203 ,, „ n'98. Gate money received. In Canada : — Montreal 4 days ...$ 20 75 Ottawa 2 „ ... ... none Toronto 4 ... ... 26 75 Hamilton 2 „ ... ... 3100 $ 78 50 In the United States : — Merion 2 days ...8 39 00 Belmont 2 . ... 50 00 Germantown 2 »» • •• ••• ... 59 00 Young America 2 „ ... ... 22 50 Longwood 2 „ ... ... none $170 50 Staten Island 2 M • • • ... none Total • 1 • 8249 00 89 PERSONNEL OF THE TEAM. Jack Lees (Jamaica) was without doubt by far and away the best all-round cricketer. As a batsman, no one came anywhere near him, and he deserved many more runs for his steady, consistent play. In the field he was excellent at all points, and if the “ catching” capabilities of the team had been up to the mark he would have been more successful at bowling. E. N. Marshall, (Jamaica) though not a stylish batsman,, was very lucky and turned out a most useful man. A very fair field, but not much of a bowler. E. M. Skeete (Barbados) established his reputation as a very useful bat; is a very a&ive and energetic field, and was especially good at longstop whenever one was used. If he sticks to the game regularly he will turn out a first-rate cricketer. W. H. Farquharson (Jamaica) stands first in bowling- averages, though, had Burke a little less, and Stewart a little more, work, the places of the three would have been changed. They all certainly did well in bowling. A very good bat, though cramped at times. His height, 6ft 4in., gives him a splendid reach and he can hit very hard. Unfortunately he is a very poor field. J. M. Burke, (Jamaica) the youngest of the team, did well, and promises good things in the future both in bowling and batting. He should certainly cultivate more activity in the field. G. Wyatt (Demerara) made highest individual score. A fair bat, but six “ ducks*’ (four consecutively) spoilt his average : for his local club he headed the list this season with 20' 5. Kept wickets a little, and was fairly good in the field. Percy Isaacs (Jamaica) has a very good style but came off M 90 very badly in batting: did well at wicket-keeping, but at catches in the out-field was at times unaccountably unlucky. R. H. Stewart (Demerara) was most successful with his slow over-arm bowling with good break from leg. A very adtive, sharp, and, as a rule, clean field. Is a good bat, but was sadly out of form. A. W. Swain (Demerara) was unlucky in his three attempts at bowling, as catches were missed off him each time : in the Germantown match, when the largest score against us was made and the batsmen well set, he bowled 25 overs, 10 of which were maidens. For his local club his average for this season reads, 157 overs, 40 maidens, 363 runs, 42 wickets: average 8’2 7. An adtive field ; throws well and with precision. Wants more pradtice at batting. T. S. Skeete (Barbados) : A steady but not elegant bat, was in want of pradtice ; his score in the match at Boston was very useful. Bowled on three occasions only; might have been made more use of. Leo. Isaacs (Jamaica) : Left-handed. Seemed unlucky at batting. Fair field ; and bowled on three occasions, without, however, much success. Louis Kerr (Demerara) was unfortunately very ill at Bar¬ bados on the way from Demerara to New York, and was far from well at any time during the tour. Though really an ex¬ cellent bat, he did nothing. As wicket-keeper, however, he was far the best of the three, and showed to perfedtion in the last two matches of the tour, stumping 5 and catching 7. W. O. Collymore (Barbados) played the fewest number of times of any of the men. He was unsuccessful at scoring. A very fair field, and held some good catches. L. R. Fyfe (Jamaica), our “ evergreen skipper,” seemed most unlucky (except as regards tossing for innings) during 91 the whole tour, never having been successful in getting into double hgures : in one Match he batted over an hour for three runs. In the field he held some fine catches at point and cover. “A FEW NOTES.” By another of them. The account of our tour has already extended to consider¬ able length, principally on account of the newspaper reports of our matches being included, which many friends wished for and all of us decided to have; some with a special view of having a permanent record of many of the curious phrases contained therein and others for the favourable and unfavour¬ able opinions expressed about us as cricketers, &c. Were we able to give the large type headings of the newspaper accounts of the matches, they would amuse some of our readers very much, but doubtless the numerous newspaper cuttings col¬ lected by most of us have already been perused by many intimate friends with keen enjoyment. It remains for me therefore to be brief. The attempt of a West Indian team visiting Canada and the United States was sneered and laughed at by many more than most people imagine, as rather a farce;—it has been done, though not as successfully as the players themselves could have wished, but looking at the team that actually represented the West Indians as compared with one that might have done so the result on this basis may be considered fairly satisfactory. Apart from poor representation the expense of the tour amounted to something very near £\ooo in all, which (less small amounts subscribed in Jamaica and Barbados, hardly it is presumed ^150 together) has been virtually paid by the men themselves. An average, however, of fyi or $340 per man in M 2 92 round figures for 8 or 9 weeks holiday, though six days cricket per week while ashore is no light work, is not out of the way. Of course, the cost for Demerara and Barbados men amounted to more than those from Jamaica, on account of the shorter journey of the latter. Gate-money was received, though the writer was very much against it from the first, but it only amounted to about ^50 between fourteen of us. Let us hope that on future occasions it will not be taken by visiting teams. Certainly, if we had come off as well as the Englishmen in 1885, it would have been a welcome help especially to some of us, but this season (1886) the Englishmen fared much worse than in 1885, the falling off being something like fifty per cent^ The ball has been set-a-rolling now, and if the result of our recent tour gives us many visits in the West Indies from our Canadian and American friends, and wakes up our Island neighbours and our own Colony to move about amongst each other and further a-field, in the interest of the " noble game,” something tangible and well worth having will have been gained, and the writer fully and well recompensed for what trouble he has taken in the matter. But a hint to our Island neighbours must be given. Some proper and really strong move must be made to secure per¬ manent and good cricket grounds everywhere in the West Indies where the game is to take any standing, and let us hope hat nowhere will this latter not be the case. In Barbados especially the rendezvous and head quarters for all passenger steamers, there ought certainly to be the best ground in the West Indies, and we trust that the “ blot” (for such it is) of not having such a ground will not continue much longer. G.W. Demerara, 20th December, 1886. -1KB THE GETTY CENTER ’JBEARY