Sodesy^-. * : ' matics p Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/coinageofwestindOOwood THE COINAGE OF THE WEST INDIES WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE CUT AND COUNTERSTAMPED PIECES* BY HOWLAND WOOD Iii any consideration of the coinage of the West Indian Islands a number of points not met with in other series present themselves. None of the coins with the exception of the Haitian issues were made on the islands, and hut few were made by the home governments for the particular use of the island colonists. It is therefore apparent that what coins the islanders had were outside coins, either imported on purpose, or brought there in the natural course of trade. The Danes for their insular possessions formed an exception, for a plentiful supply of coins made especially for their West Indian colonies was sent over from the beginning up to the present day. Despite this a large number of merchants of St. Thomas have issued tokens of small denominations based on the Mexican dollar. t In passing it may be well to state that Fig. 1. Denmark has made the only gold coins for actual use in the West In- dies. Fig. 1 shows the four daler or twenty franc piece. Spain in recent years only, made a silver coinage for Porto Rico. England at one time has made copper money for Bermuda, Bahamas, Barbados and Antigua, and since 1869 a plentiful nickel coinage for Jamaica. The English silver coinages consist of the so-called anchor pieces, the three -halfpenny pieces for Jamaica and Ceylon, and four -penny pieces which partake more of the nature of general colonial issues. In recent years the four-penny piece bears the inscription British guiana and * These notes have been made largely from the extensive collection of these pieces in the cabinet of The American Numismatic Society. f The Danish West Indies have had several standards ; up to 1849 the skilling was in use, from 1849 to 1904 base silver and bronze coins, the sub-divisions of the dollar were used, since 1904 with the advent of a gold, silver, nickel and bronze coinage the monetary unit has been the franc — five francs erpial a Danish West Indian dollar, one franc equals one hundred hits, five bits equal one cent. The American Journal of Numismatics 90 west indies. France at times lias made copper and billon coins for her colonies in general, and a silver coinage in 1731 and 1732 for the Windward Islands.* In recent years tokens in nickel have been struck at Paris for Martinique and Guadeloupe. The Netherlands has but recently issued a distinctive coinage for Curasao. All of the home countries sent over, when they actually had to, a limited supply of worn out silver coins and copper tokens. In reading over the various acts and legislations of the different island govern- ments, and also the petitions sent home, we see that the islanders seldom if ever had enough actual money on hand, or if at any time they did have, it was not of suitable denominations for their purposes. The different islands had varying standards brought about by their location, the influence of their foreign trade, or oftentimes by their previous system of accounts, for in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries they frequently changed hands on account of the wars between the English, French, Spanish, and Dutch. The currency of the English colonies comes under three epochs; that before 1705, between 1705 and 1825, and from 1825 to the present, due to important legislations regarding colonial currency made in 1705 and 1825. A glance at conditions in the islands in the early days is absolutely necessary for an understanding of the monetary systems in vogue. The growing trade with the Spanish Main and the rise of the buccaneers brought in the Spanish -American money to the different islands, though the system of accounts was largely kept in the money of the home countries, such as pounds, shilling and pence ; and livres and sols. In the Seventeenth Century the Spanish dollar or piece of eight generally passed for four shillings sixpence, it often passed for five shillings or the English crown. t In Jamaica the dollar was equivalent to four shillings, and the eighth or real to sixpence. Heavy and light pieces were generally accepted at the same value with the usual result that the light coins drove out the heavy pieces, the good being shipped away from the islands as merchandise. With the possible exception of Jamaica, the home of the buccaneers, which always had a sufficient currency, the colonies were continually enacting measures to keep what little supply they had on the islands. As a consequence, the coins re- maining kept passing at an enhanced value. * These are the familiar Isles du Vent pieces, known on some of the English islands as crimbals, from the name of their introducer at Barbados. -j- For various notes on the English islands I am indebted to A History of Currency in the British Colonies, by Robert Chalmers, London, 1893 ; and for the French possessions, to Ilistoire monetaire des Colonies francaises, by E. Zay, Paris, 1892. The Coinage of the West Indies 91 After the Act of 1705 most of the islands went on a gold standard, Spanish and Brazilian gold coins being plentiful. The latter coins in time proved the more popular, especially the pieces known as the half dobra, better known as the half Johannes or Joe.* These pieces were of four escudos, sometimes called pe mark has probably no connection with the large t p crowned found stamped on a Spanish -American peso mentioned on p. 109. J. Meili has described in several of his publications, a number of Portuguese gold pieces bearing various marks and punches. Some of these had doubtless an official status, but sufficient clues are lacking for their attribution. Unfortunately there have been in recent years some p false counterstamps made impressed on gold coins often in conjunc- tion with genuine marks. One of the common stamps on silver coins is what is apparently a double -headed fleur-de -lis (Fig. 125). Some have thought this mark * Brash or was employed in 171)2 by the authorities of the United States mint to make assays for the mint on sundry coins of gold and silver, vide American Journal of Numismatics, July, 1892, p. 20. t Sold by S. W A II., July, lOO.'i, lot 582. The American Journal of Numismatics 120 to have reference to some French colony. The shape of the fleur-de- lis would almost preclude this. I think the best conclusion concerning this punch, on account of it being found on so many mutilated United States coins, is that it was a stamp formerly used at one of the United States sub -treasuries to impress on coins submitted for redemption, which were then returned to the owner as unredeemable. These punches have varied at different times, and inquiries as to whether this fleur-de-lis was one of the stamps used, has resulted in no infor- mation from the government. The small round plug impressed with a crude 2 (Fig. 126), has up Fig. 12G. to date remained a mystery, no ring or dollar from which it was re- moved has turned up to identify the piece. The real with a 7 and some mark resembling an s above it within a depressed oval (Fig. 127) has so far been unsolved. Possibly the mark above the seven is a symbol for pence (d) . There has recently come to light an eighth of a Spanish -American dollar counterstamped simply with the date 1838 (Fig. 128), which must refer to the West Indies, for in that year an Order in Council effected certain remedial measures concerning currency and valuations for the different British islands, by which decree the dollar was rated at four shillings twopence, and the doubloon at sixty-four shillings. Bo far, however, the exact attribution to any one island has been futile. The Cayenne sous are sometimes found counterstamped with vari- ous letters; some that have come to the writer’s attention are w c d, c w c, v & d, e. h. These were undoubtedly private stamps of mer- chants and had possibly local circulation at some enhanced value, as did the piece stamped by Francois Declos on Trinidad ( Vide, p. 110) . Although the cut coins of modern times are essentially a West Indian product, the practice has been employed sporadically in other The Coinage ob’ the West Indies 121 parts of the world. During the middle ages the small silver coins of Europe were at times cut in quarters and halves, simply to make divi- sional parts. The silver pennies of England cut into halves and fourths or farthings, are good examples. Early Mohammadan coins are also found cut into halves. Probably, however, the Arabs themselves did not do this to any great extent, but other people did, for early Cufic money has been found in various places of Europe, especially in Scan- dinavian countries, where the proportion of coins cut in halves or less seems to be fairly plentiful. Modern cut coins doubtless influenced by the prevailing practice in the Antilles have been noted in various countries, and although they do not necessarily come within a discussion of West Indian coins, they are so closely associated that a brief mention of some of the pieces is justified, especially as many of them are at times confused with the West Indian series. Brazil. According to J. Meili,* in the province of Rio Grande do Sul, about the time of the war with Paraguay., private persons stamped Spanish pesetas with 400 in a ' rectangular indent, making the piece pass for that number of reis or a balastraca, or cut the pieces into halves and stamped each piece with an indented 200, or into quarters and stamped the segments 100. These cut half and quarter balastra- cas had crude crenated edges. He also records a larger piece cut into quarters bearing a stamp in two lines 200 *sb s (Sao Borja ?) , and Bolivian eight sueldos cut into fifths or less, with large w r avy crenelles and bearing various marks. According to Enrique Pena,f gold and silver was cut and counterstamped in various ways between 1866 and 1869. Mexico. The coinage of this country is replete with counter - stamped coins, especially with initials and monograms. Whether or not much money was used in a cut state in Mexico is a question. The only instances that have come to notice, are one real pieces cut in half and stamped with sat in monogram, said to be for Santa Anna de Tamaulipas, and Spanish eight real pieces sliced down like the St. Lucia pieces to pass for four reals and stamped in five lines in a circle, 4 r | mon prov | di | hidalgo | • m • . These were said to have been issued during the revolution of 1810 under Hidalgo. Although I have seen none of the pieces that were sliced off, they were probably used and stamped for two reals. * Das Brasilianische Geldwessen, II Theil, 1905, pp. 355 ff. t Monedas y Medallas Paraguayas, Asuncidn, 1900. Tiie American Journal of Numismatics 122 United States. In tlie United States during the latter part of the Eighteenth Century and the first half of the Nineteenth, the Spanish - American dollar and half were cut privately into halves, quarters and eighths. Although these had no official sanction they passed readily for hits. They were more in use in the South and West and grew out of the necessity for small change. United States half dollars were at times treated in this way. It is said that in some of the Indian agen- cies in the West, this custom continued for some time. This cut silver bore no mark or stamp nor were the edges crenated, so that from a numismatic standpoint it has little value. We have seen before that in some of the West Indian islands silver was treated in the same man- ner without any distinguishing mark. One notable exception, how- ever, deserves mention, namely the cut quarter segments of Spanish dollars stamped on one side in script letters T. H within a circle of six- teen links, in each of which is a small star, the reverse has a circular punch, in the centre of which, within a circle, is a displayed American eagle with shield on breast, around edge nouvelle Orleans (Fig. 129) . These pieces were probably stamped by Puech Bein of New Orleans, from the fact that there is a copper token issued by Puecli Bein & Co., dated 1834 (Low, Hard Times Tokens, no. 82) . The quarter segment was undoubtedly issued earlier, probably not many years after it be- came part of the United States, as New Orleans is spelled in the French manner. The coin illustrated was cut from a dollar that had been counter - stamped m v a | 1812, so that it is probable that the New Orleans piece was issued about this time or a little later. Some of these segments also bear an additional counterstamp Had in script letters (Fig. 130). Just Tiie Coinage of the West Indies 123 what this latter stamp signifies is a question, as the silver in the piece is good, though lighter in weight than the first coin. Probably this p b stamp was extensively counterfeited, and the issuers of the genuine stamped Bad on all of those pieces they could get hold of. The dies used on the latter are not the same as employed on the first piece. The obverse side is nearly identical, but the chain has seventeen links and the reverse die is very coarsely executed. This money shows a West Indian influence, and the attempt at dentillation of the cut edge by means of a file, producing a wavy effect, should be noted. Great Britain. Owing to the failure of the Government in the early part of the Nineteenth Century to issue silver coin, Spanish money was used to a considerable extent in Great Britain. Much of this was connterstamped, first in 1797 by the Government. These were Spanish dollars counterstamped with a small head of George III in oval, changed in 1804 to an octagon, and were issued by the Bank of England at four shillings ninepence. Later, mill owners, merchants and other private persons counterstampecfci dollars. This was done largely in Scotland and the values impressed on the pieces ranged var- iously from four shillings sixpence to five shillings sixpence. The Rothsay mills in Buteshire seem to be about the only concern to cut the dollars into subdivisions, these were cut into halves and thirds and were valued at two shillings sixpence and one shilling eightpence respectively. Sierra Leone. A coin already referred to on p. 115 has so many characteristics of the series under discussion that it surely must have been influenced by the West Indian issues. The coin is a quarter seg- ment, of a dollar counterstamped with a crowned w R (Fig. 131) and has no cremations on the cut edges. Chalmers states (op. cit ., p. 209), that cut Spanish money was in use in this African colony before 1825, that it was nominally cut into quarters, but practically into five parts. In 1831 the colony obtained from England, a stamp (shown on Fig. 131) for the purpose of stamping cut money to be legally current. In the Caldecott sale (op. cit.) lot 309, is a Spanish four real piece with 124 The American Journal of Numismatics the same stamp blit with the tail of the r broken off. The old cut money was called in, and in 1832 the stamped cut money was made legal tender to the exclusion of the unstamped pieces ; however, this latter was made legal in 1834, and in fact the commissariat cut great quantities of dollars the next year. In 1839 the cut money was de- monetized and about 125,000 pieces were taken in. Unstamped cut money also circulated in the Gambia and the Gold Coast. New South Wales. Great trouble had been experienced in this colony in keeping what coins there were in circulation from being ex- ported. In 1813 a large number of Spanish dollars was imported and the Government immediately issued a proclamation to the effect that dollars with a circular piece cut out of them would be put in circula- tion. The ring known as a “ holey dollar” had a hole about 19mm., the cut edge nicely milled and on one side the words, five • shillings and a palm branch around the inner edge, and on the other side new south wales • 1813 • The piece removed, known as a “dump,” bore on the obverse a crown and above new south wales and below 1813, on the reverse fifteen pence in two lines. Both sides show dentilated milling. It was also forbidden to export these coins. After 1822 the value of these was tixed at seventy -five cents or three-quarters of a Spanish dollar for the “ holey dollar,” and twenty -five cents or one- quarter of a Spanish dollar for the “ dump.” In conclusion it may be said that the various cut and counter - stamped coins are now becoming rare, many of the pieces extremely so, and that very few are found on the islands on which they were once used. This is chiefly due to the fact that when they were demon- etized due notice was generally, given for redemption and the pieces were eventually melted up. Varieties that once probably did exist are now unknown, for we have acts and laws of some of the islands show- ing that cut or stamped money was authorized. The gold which was once abundant, is now very scarce, the melting pot having claimed its own. Heretofore, collectors as a class have paid but little attention to this curious coinage, and what little has been studied and observed on this series has been done abroad. I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to Mr. David Proskey of Paterson, N. J., for the loan for photographing of the following coins: nos. 3, 18, 37, 59, 77, 78, 96, 97, 99, 102, 104, 115a, 118, 126 and 127 ; to Mr. Nelson P. Pehrson for no. 68, and to Mr. James W. Ellsworth for nos. 122, 123 and 124. The Coinage of the West Indies 125 LIST OF COUNTERSTAMPS FOUND CHIEFLY ON WEST INDIAN COINS The numbers in parentheses refer to coins illustrated LETTERS B Uncertain (122, 123) Had Puech Rein, New Orleans (130) C Curasao (105) C and value Curasao (102) C and anchor Ville du Cap, Haiti (111) C C See St. Martin (37) C W C Unassigned, private mark ?, page 120 H) Dominica (4, 5) E B Ephraim Brasher, New York (123) E H) Demerara and Essequibo (119) E. &. D Demerara and Essequibo (120, 121) E. H. Unassigned, private mark ?, page 120 F I) Frangois Declos at Trinidad (8.6) F “7( in monogram Danish W est Indies (59a) F ^ VII monogram Danish West Indies (59) F. 7°. Cuba and Porto Rico (113) G incuse Grenada (60, 61, 62, 84) G crowned Guadeloupe (50, 51, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57) G radiated Guadeloupe (52) G in 15 rayed star Guadeloupe (47) G H See St. Vincent (69) G'LD Guadeloupe. La Desirade G P crowned Azores, see page 102 G R Jamaica (107 ) G % crowned Jamaica (108, 109, 110) G T Grande Terre (Guadeloupe) G T in monogram Grande Terre (Guadeloupe) II in lozenge or square Virgin Islands (18, 19) I in octagon Inagua (117, 118) 1 B Barbados ?, page 93 1 4" D He Desirade (Guadeloupe) 1 G Guadeloupe I H Trinidad, page 1 10 and Fig. 63 I T Tobago ? I T crowned Tobago ? / IV See Grenada (62, 63) The American Journal of Numismatics 120 L • C • Ville du Cap, Haiti L M Martinique L S Les Saintes (Guadeloupe) L 8 in monogram See S L in monogram M Montserrat (30) M St. Martin (34) M in circular indent Martinique (95, 96) M in heart Martinique M in square indent Montserrat (27, 28, 29) M : G Marie Galente (Guadeloupe) N Nevis '? NEVIS Nevis (23, 24) N SI) St. Domingue (Haiti) Q (amulet) St. Lucia (70) OO (amulets) St. Lucia () crowned St. Bartholomew P Philipsburg (39,40,41) P ‘B Puech Bein, New Orleans (129, 130) P M crowned Mozambique, see page 102 P . P Pointe a Pitre (Guadeloupe) R F Guadeloupe (45, 46, 48, 49, 58 ) S incuse The Saints (20, 21, 22) S in relief St. Vincent (66, 67, 68, 69) S A T in monogram Santa Anna de Tainaulipas (Mexico) S B Stro Borja, Brazil, page 121 S : I) St. Domingue (Haiti) S E St. Eustatius (40, 41, 42) S E® St. Eustatius S K St. Kitts (25) S L St. Lucia S L in crowned shield St. Lucia S L in monogram St. Lucia (71) S: Lucie St. Lucia (72, 73) S M in oval Santa Margarita ? S M in circle St. Martin ? S T M St. Martin (35) S* MARTIN St. Martin (36) S P St. Pierre (Martinique) S P in monogram St. Pierre (Martinque) ST • PE St. Pierre (Martinque) Stampee Irinidad S V in monogram St. Vincent (64, 65) T on Cayenne sous Virgin Islands (16, 17) The Coinage of the West Indies 127 T on silver Tobago (75, 7b, 77, 78) T radiated Trinidad (88) T I! Tobago T 0 B Tobago (79) T' B Tobago (80) TO B A Gr O Tobago TIATILA V irgin Islands (15, 22) TORTOLA Virgin Islands (12, 13, 14) T P Unidentified (124) T P crowned Unidentified, see under Trinidad, page 109 T R Trinidad (84) V Vieque (33) V & I) Unassigned, private mark ?, page 120 \V C I) Unassigned, private mark ?, page 120 W P crowned For W R W R crowned Sierre Leone (131) V. II. Cuba and Porto Rico (114) NUMERALS AND DEVIOUS Q amulet St. Lucia (70) Anchor and C Ville du Cap, Haiti (111) Arrows St. Martin (36, 37) Crown St. Bartholomew (43, 44) Crowned heart Martinique (94) Crowned numerals, (16, 12, 6, 4, 3) Dominica (6, 7, 8, 9, 10) Crowned numerals, and M (18, 9, 7, 4, 3) Montserrat (31, 39) Crowned O St. Bartholomew Eagle under 20 or 22 Martinique (87, 88) Fleur-de-lis St. Martin (34) Fleur-de-lis double-headed Uncertain (125) Head Rev. value Haiti (112) Heart Martinique Heart crowned Martinique (94) Heart rayed Martinique Ivey Cuba (115, 115a) Lattice Trinidad (85) Rosace of five petals Curagao (97, 98, 99) Star or Sun of twelve rays Vieque (32) 2 on plug Unassigned (126) 2 • 6 Montserrat 8 in circle Curasao (100, 101) 5 in depression Curagao ? (105) 9 in oval Curagao ? (104) 1-28 The American Journal of Numismatics 18 in square Curasao ? (103) 20 above eagle Martinique (87) 21 and rosace Curasao (99) 22 above eagle Martinique (88) 22 in rectangle St. Martin (38) 22 in square Demerara and Essequibo 2 I 5 Inagua (118) 82 io Guadeloupe (56) 100 Brazil, page 121 200 Brazil, page 121 400 Brazil, page 121 1838 Unassigned (128) DESCRIPTION OF CENTRAL HOLES AND PIECES CUT FROM SAME Heart shaped Martinique (89-93) Hexagonal Tobago (81) Octagonal Tobago (74, 75, 76) Octagonal (Plug only) Guadeloupe (45) Round (smooth) 23mm. Dominica (7, 8) Round (smooth) 23mm. St. Vincent (66, 67) Round (smooth) 19mm. New South Wales Round (smooth) 17mm. Dominica (11) Round (smooth) 15mm. St. Kitts ? (26) Round (smooth) 3mm. Porto Rico (116) Round (scalloped) 15, 16, 17 crenelles Dominica (2, 3, 4, 5, 6) Round (scalloped) 14 and 15 crenelles Trinidad (82, 83) Round (scalloped) 19 crenelles Demerara and Essequibo (120, 121) Square (plain) Guadeloupe Square (scalloped) Guadeloupe (50, 51, 52) Square (scalloped) Grenada ? (61) THE SOU MARQUE BY HOWLAND WOOD One of the early coins that played an important part, in the mer- cantile transactions on this hemisphere, was a small billon piece issued by the French. It was known under various names but chiefly as the sou marque. Its smallness and little purchasing power caused it to be viewed with more or less contempt, whence we get the expression, “ not worth a sou marque”. The pieces received various names in the different localities in which they were used, for they were exported to nearly all of the West Indian islands whether settled by French, En- glish, Swedes or Dutch. The first of these coins came into existence by a royal edict dated October, 1738. They were originally intended for circulation in France, but they soon found their way into the colonies. The issue was very extensive and probably all of the French mints were engaged in their manufacture. Pieces from the following mints have come to our notice — Paris, Bordeaux, Lyons, Metz, Montpelier, Orleans, Rennes, La Rochelle, Ronen, Strasbourg, Tours and Troyes. The striking was discontinued in 1770, and without doubt, dates for each year can be found. The following is the description of the piece struck in the Paris mint: Pig. 1. Double Sol of 24 deniers. Obv. lud xv. d. g. fr. (m.m. fox) . et nav. hex A crowned l between three fleurs-de-lis. Rev. SIT NOM. DOM. (m.m. A) benedictum + 1738. Two interlaced l’s com- posed of three branches, crown above. Billon. 22|mm., wt. 2.185 grammes. (Fig. 1.) The small fox on the obverse was the mark of Renard du Tasta, director of the Paris mint. Pieces from the other mints had their cor- responding mint letters and marks. This coin was popularly called a marque in distinction to the older worn out billon coins. 130 The American Journal of Numismatics There was also issued a smaller one sol piece of twelve deniers that was probably struck in several of the mints in France, as I have met with them from those of Paris, Besanqon, Dijon, Lille, Lyons, Metz, Nantes, Rouen, Strasbourg and Toulouse. This smaller piece possi- bly circulated in some of the colonies, though no record of it in the West Indies is found. Breton mentions it as being in circulation in Canada, where both denominations bore the same values as in France. By royal ordinance in 1744, they were reduced both in Canada and in France to eighteen deniers and nine deniers respectively, making the larger piece pass for the same value in Canada as the older billon piece of thirty deniers or six blancs, dated 1710, called a mousquetaire, which had been reduced to eighteen deniers in 1738. In the French Antilles they passed at the higher value of two sols six deniers, where they were known as noirs on account of their black appearance. They soon found their way into the English islands in the West Indies under the name of French son marks or black dogs, where they were valued at one and a half pence or one-sixth of a bit. At Cayenne they originally passed for their full value of two sous but in 1779 were reduced a quarter or to eighteen deniers. In this col- ony they were very extensively used, and to facilitate transactions they were done up in rolls of sixty and circulated in that form for six livres and were then called rouleaux. They were introduced into St. Helena in 1750 to pass for two pence and were called French pieces. They were also used in the Isles of France and Bourbon, where they were valued at three sols or sous by an edict of 1770. The use of this marque in many of the West Indian islands, and their convenience in small transactions, caused the colonists to petition to the home government for more pieces of this nature. We have an edict of 1763 causing 600,000 livres, or about that number of our pounds, of these worn twenty -four denier pieces of the edict of 1738, of which we have just spoken, to be stamped on one side with a crowned c for use for the colonies in general (Fig. 2) . As these pieces had recently been demonetized and vast quantities had been returned to the treasury, THE SOU MARQUE 131 the reissue of these in a new form was a happy solution. These were originally known as pieces of billon of eighteen deniers. As this was purely a colonial issue, it was forbidden for any one to have them in France or to bring them back from the islands in America. Zay, in his Histoire monetaire des Colonies franchises, gives, besides the c crowned struck in relief, two other types which he calls “ essais.” One has a small c crowned in depressed outline (Fig. 3) , the other a larger device treated in the same manner (Fig. 4). Without doubt, these were simply early types of this stamp, as specimens have been found in the West Indies, which would hardly be the case if they were pat- terns. Probably the large punch was replaced by the more common stamp as shown in Fig. 2, which did not mutilate the coin so badly, as is shown by the reverse of Fig. 4. The smaller stamp most likely was discarded as not being large enough. From the start these evidently proved popular, and the supply of old plan chets soon became much depleted. Partly on this account and for other reasons, it was decided in 1767 to substitute a copper issue for the colonies in general, but the population in the Antilles, especially at Guadeloupe, had become so accustomed to the small, light billon pieces they refused to take the new coppers. Consequently in these places the government had to revert to the old billon type. The supply of worn marques totally ran out in a few years, for we find when 30,000 livres worth of these were ordered to be sent to Cay- enne in 1779, the mint officials at Paris were obliged to stamp these on new billon flans (Fig. 5) . These c crowned pieces have been assigned by most American cataloguers to Cayenne, probably under the suppo- sition that the c was for that place. The edict clearly states that they 132 The American Journal of Numismatics were intended for a general American colonial issue, and the c is doubt- less the initial for colonies. On account of the simplicity of the device, counterfeits abounded, but the flans were for the most part made of brass or some base metal tinned. An interesting counterfeit of the earlier type is illustrated (Fig. 6), imitating not only the counterstamp, but also the partially defaced legend of the original marque. As an instance of the large number of counterfeits in circulation the case of Martinique is of in- Fig. 6. terest. In 1797 during the English occupation of this island, a law was passed prohibiting the circulation of false sou marques which had been introduced in great numbers, but on account of the trouble to distinguish the good from the bad, and on account of the small number of good pieces on the island, six months later another decree was issued admitting provisionally the false marques at ten deniers each or eigh - teen to the escalin of fifteen sols. These c crowned pieces were called by the French in the Antilles etampes (Creole tampes) and for the most part passed at an enhanced value of three sous nine deniers. By the English they were called stampees* and as such they were generally countermarked with some device for the different islands, and as a rule, four went to a bit. At Cayenne they were called noirs and were originally valued at two sous, but in 1779, when a large quantity was sent there, their value was fixed at eighteen deniers or one and one -half sous. They were superseded in 1781 by a new issue and were demonetized in 1828. These likewise were put up in rouleaux of sixty at a value of four livres ten sous. In the Reunion Islands the coins were known as carons. We have noticed that the early marque circulated in the Isles of France and Bourbon. These two islands are in the Indian Ocean off the coast of Madagascar. lie de Bourbon was discovered in 1545 by the Portuguese and was taken by the French in 1638 by whom it was * The English colonists generally used the word stampee with reference to any of the billon coins that bore subsequent counterstamps, including the Cayenne sous mentioned later on. All these, but chiefly the uncounterstamped pieces were called dogs or black dogs, the name sou marqu^ being less or locally used. THE SOU MARQUE 138 named Bourbon in honor of Louis XIV. During the French Revolu- tion this island and the lie de France joined their governments to- gether, and in 1793 they were known as the Reunion Islands, which under the Empire was changed to Bonaparte. From 1811 to 1848 the first island went back to its old name of Bourbon. Since then it has been called Reunion. Between 1810 and 1815 it was under England. He de France was called Acerno by the Portuguese, who discovered it in 1505, and Maurice by the Dutch. The French occupied it from 1715 to 1810, and from that time it has been held by the English under the name of Mauritius. Pursuant with its policy of furnishing the various colonies with a coin of small value, the French government struck a billon piece for these islands in 1779. The piece had a value of three sols and was of a new design that was subsequently used for other colonies. Obv. louis xvi. li. de (m. ni. a crane) fe. ft nav. Three fleurs-de-lis under a crown. Rev. isles de fe et de bourbon (m. ni. a lyre), in centre 3 | sols. | 1779 | a. 23mm., .2.185 grammes. (Fig. 7.) Two million of these were ordered to be made at the Paris mint, and they were struck on new planchets as well as on the old marques of the edict of 1738. Some of this issue bear the date 1780. The denomination of the piece is for three sous as the old billon marque passed current here for that value. These new pieces likewise were called a marque and were valued at one half of their inscribed value in France or one sol six deniers, 66% went to ten colonial livres or five French livres.'" An edict of 1781 authorized 6,720,000 more of these coins for the the two islands. Besides bearing the date 1781, the only other differ- ence is a circle separating the legend from the central inscription, and the word sols being changed to the newer spelling sous (Fig. 8) . All of these coins were demonetized in 1828. There is also a pattern of a similar coin with the value of two sous. It will be remembered that the Decaen piastre of 1810 for these islands was for ten livres. 134 The American Journal of Numismatics The same edict called for similar three sou pieces for the colonies in general and Cayenne. The obverses were the same as the above, the reverses were as follows: Ttev. colonies fran raises (ni. m. a lyre), in dotted circle 3 | sous | 1781 | A. Same, but without circle. Rev. colon IE DE CAYENNE (in. in. a lyre), iii linear circle 3 | sous | 1781 | A. These pieces were not placed in circulation, the values being wrong, as two sous was the generally accepted valuation in the other colonies. As far as Cayenne goes this was changed, as an edict of November, 1781, created a two sou piece, although the edict of fabrication was not until January, 1782. Nevertheless from the dates found on the coins, the striking began two years earlier, as pieces are found dated 1780, and 1781 as well as 1782. The issue was continued in 1783, 1780, 1787, 1788 and 1789. None were struck in 1784 and 1785. Tig. !). Fig. 10. Obv. Louis xvi. R. de (in. m. a crane) fr. et nay. three fleurs-de-lis under a crown. Rev. colonie de cayenne ( ni.in. a lyre), in circle 2 \ sous | 1782 | a. 23mm., 1.90 grammes. (Fig. 9.) Tin •ee million of these were struck, some on new flans and others on the older marques. These retired the earlier pieces of eighteen den- iers, and were themselves withdrawn in 1844 when they were valued at seven and one -half centimes. These pieces found ready circulation in the West Indies where they were generally counterstamped by the dif- ferent island governments. The commonest date for these stampees is 1789. Of this date we note two varieties, one with mint mark of the regular small lyre, the other with a larger inclined lyre (Fig. 10) . These coins were called noirs or sous marques noirs on account of their black appearance. As we have said before they were the dogs or the black dogs of the English settlers. The next few years produced several pattern coins: Obv. lud. xvi. D. o. fr. et. XAV. rex fleur-de-lis. Two script l’s interlaced, in centre a fleur-de-lis. The mintmark r for Limoges, in exergue. THE SOU MARQUE 135 Rev. In a circle of small fleurs-de-lis 2 j sols. | 6 | deniers | fleur-de-lis | 1786. These dies were cut by Droz. Obv. Similar to above. Rev. In a circle of small fleurs-de-lis trois | sols. | maltese cross | 1787. Dies also cut by Droz. The obverse of these two pieces was later copied in the 1816 and 1818 ten centimes of He Bourbon and La Gfuiane. Obv. lud. xvi. n. G. fr. et. NAV. rex. Three fleurs-de-lis under a sun-burst. In exergue R for Orleans. Rev. sit. xom. dom. benediotum. Two ornate l’s interlaced, superimposed on a sun-burst, above a crown. In exergue 1781. An interesting pattern dated 1789 was designed for use in the Antilles, but owing to the opposition of the colonies, especially at Saint Domingue, on account of an arbitrary denomination being fixed for the different islands, and the consequent doubt of the projectors of being able to place the coin in circulation the piece advanced no further than the experimental stage. Its description is: Obv. Same as the Cayenne sous. Rev. isles du vent et sous le vent. (in. m. a lyre). In held, 2 sous | 6 den. | 1789 | A. 22mm. In 1816 another piece was designed for Cayenne but was not put in circulation. Obv. louis xvn i roi de FRANCE Three fleurs-de-lis under a crown. Rev. colonie de cayenne In exergue 7V (for Tiolier) and cock. In field, within linear circle 2 | sous | 1816 | A. 22mm. In the same year a billon piece was placed in circulation in lie de Bourbon that departed in a number of particulars from the previous pieces, and formed a model for subsequent issues. Fig. 12. Obv. LOUIS xvi li — roi de fran Two script l’s facing and interlaced, crowned, in centre fleur-de-lis. Rev. In incuse letters on a broad granulated band isle de bourbon 1816 In field 10 | cent. | cock and a | N Tiolier. 22mm., 2.5 grammes. (Fig. 11.) 136 The American Journal of Numismatics One hundred and fifty thousand were ordered to be struck and were composed of two -tenths silver. They were reduced in value in 1850 to seven and one -half centimes and were demonetized in 1879. A similar piece followed in 1818 for French Guiana or Cayenne. Obv. Similar to lie de Bourbon piece. Rev. In incuse letters on a broad granulated band guyanne franchise In field, 10 | cent. | cock and A | N 'Holier. 22mm., 2.5 grammes. (Fig. 12.) Two million were ordered to be struck and were composed of two- tenths silver, this being a larger proportion of silver than in the earlier pieces, they kept a whiter appearance and went under the name of a marque blane in contrast to a noir by which the other pieces had been designated. By order of the governor in 1819 they passed at thirteen and one -third centimes or six at eighty centimes or a colonial livre. They were issued in rolls containing sixty or thirty pieces, and were still current in 1892. In 184G a similar piece was issued for the same value but contain- ed less than G per cent, silver, and were coined from the old black sous marques that had been retired in 1814. Obv. LOUIS phtllippe I ROI des FRAN (“A is In centre the monogram L p in floriated script crowned. Rev. In incuse letters guyane franqaise 1846 on broad granulated band. In held 10 | cent.- | index hand and A | barre 22mm., 2.5 grammes. (Fig. 13.) These also were known as marques blancs. This issue ended the French colonial billon coinage and was the last survival of the old sou marque that began as a French coin in 1738, which bade fair to rival in its humble way the popularity of the Spanish -American dollar and its subdivisions. p / :<£ j'l > ' . ■ * ; . I ; 1 ' 77 ■ J Vm'W'M).,- ''■-'‘•V'VrhM! & Mi ymcM ; . . yyy. p ' ^ ;■; :V;.;-:j 0 -; r .iiv Iv ■> i v . ivm i 1 f : ^‘ '! lM .:A/> i'i- '.' ■■: 't * f Si i-i-y \ ' ■' 77 mi A V / .Vf , fwv '■ /A'S WP-mM J i ”■ -’V ’ l*. • •;l«; ) '/”•' : '' i'.-i. 1 / '! ■' .T‘| , 'V i !.' “i-'jv >.y/‘, i, /) /’ '■/ j t/, j"" 1 *! 1 ' ■ / 7 : ■ k m . v ■ ' '! if- : !.' 4 ter.j ;V> . .., ,, lllpW-' -1 \ m < v ' : if- ■ ■ ■ ■ i /i ' 1 .■,;; to pfIPi /*' .' : t? ■ I. W,‘-:rm ■ 7" '■•'!■ , « V -1 S ' : - ■ ' i® ' ' : m v * >/,. y V 1, 7; ' ' * - ':,>i Ssfv.-i-.J: MSSSSmS ’- f v '" ;i : \ mmm •i '-.. /r r ;--.; i,; /c- >7v ■": . 1 . V .V • / V i'A \]Yy ;,.; 7 k. . ; J 4 i|i#M^jL-,. r y 77 .- ;.,. f . -*™,, raf , .,-J 1 ■' ; M ■ V. " §mm WM h> , ,. v Mil ■ 7 .• . \ V ,-.v • r/ ' 1 1 mm ‘■W ■1 ' : l r;i ’ .'ft ..V: .'M ,..J;.,i ::,; > A '' •* I ; 7*^7 7 - , • . 1 i '...■ i : v".' -i 1 s. ; V .’. ' .< . : ' 1.1 i '-f « . 7 „ i, ; ' 4 -v«SB X,'- -vl ,10 / v- if ;Cvi ,^ 4 ? fe'pw ., V I. ! ' - ' 1 ,.r\ r<- \ m ,'r ■p ; ; w$ if h'^ mkm fi/i XY' •■ i ■■ ' : /V ■ M ■ 7 ■ t pyyiyy .. .■ ippy), ■ ryj np: ;; a i ^ : r 7 ■ ; ; ; Vi U •! .' . HR \ , ' ■ - i ■ ' ' ,:i , ■ " ' - VI I x . : Wk ■ ym ''yyyVyimm 77- . .y,. /, ,'v , U ; . T . - .-Wu i . -Jv!vk'p } : ■■ ' ' ! I ' "■: .'''■ 1 7 ; | 7 VkU- mB : VpV>- l.'V v, (l' 1 m .. 7 . > " i -V^ ’ : r"(* ..:!(/ .1 ,t< '•? li 1 •«■/!.; ' 1 'li - ; ; • "■ '/ ... . - v ■[]■% kvmwmy Wykfkk W V f I 7 4 tj V i'A :»7 ; ; ■ , j t\ ' 7 ■■• 7 »Xr y ■yy. y'i 'im y' 7 yy \yp yvvy 'i^Vy y . :,'A-(.i , •••} : i . im)- ■ 7.,,; . $ >. - ■■■'.. jV ,t" 'W'i/A .-b '■■/ , •■'. 7 M : ,;u ; vg: ; r^a.?i »■ ■' ;v m^''vypm’kH 1 , h ' .! ■■■■'< y h *y ■ i 1 ■ ■ '■■ - ' . - 1 GETTY CENTER LIBRARY