I Principles of Decorative Design. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/principlesofdeco00dres_1 Decorative Design. PRINCIPLES OF ECORATivE Design. BV Christopher Dresser, Ph.D., F.L.S., F.E.B.S., etc., Author of " T/ie Art of Decorative Design," " U/iity in Variety," etc. Ca^^EEE, PeTTEF(, & QAEPIjN; London, Paris, and New York. PREFACE Y object in writing tliis work lias been that of aiding in the art-education of those who seek a knowledge of ornament as applied to our industrial manufactures. I have not attempted the production of a pretty book, but have aimed at giving what knowledge I possess upon the subjects treated of, in a simple and intelligible manner. I have attempted simply to instruct. The substance of the present work was first published as a series of lessons in the Technical Educator. These lessons are now collected into a work, and have been carefully revised ; a few new illustrations have been inserted, and a final chapter added. As the substance of this work was written as a series of lessons for the Technical Educator, I need not say that the book is addressed to working men, for the whole of the lessons in that publication have been prepared especially for those noble fellows who, through want of early opportunity, have been without the advantages of education, but who have the praiseworthy courage to educate themselves in later life, when the value of knowledge has become apparent to them. That the lessons as given in the Technical Educator have not been written wholly in vain I already know, for shortly before I had completed this revision of them, I had the opportunity of visiting a provincial town hall which I had heard was being decorated, and was pleasingly surprised vi PREFACE. to see decoration of considerable merit, and evidences that mucli of what I saw liad resulted from a consideration of my articles in the Technical Educator. The artist engaged upon the work, although having suffered the disadvantage of apprenticeship to a butcher, has established himself as a decorator while still a young man ; and from the manifestation of ability which he has already given, I hope for a brighter future for one who, as a working man, must have studied hard. If these lessons as now collected into a work should lead to the development of the art- germs which doubtless lie dormant in other working men, the object which I have sought to attain in writing and collecting these together will have been accomplished. Tower Cress y, Notting Hill, London, W. CojNTEJNT^ CHAPTER I. PAGE Introductoky — Division I. Akt-knowledge ; Histokic Styles . . . . 1 „ II. Truth, Beauty, Power, etc. . . . . .14 „ III. Humour i.\ Ouxament • .... 25 CHAPTER II. COEOUR ............ 30 CHAPTER III. Furniture 50 CHAPTER IV. Decoration oe Buildings— Division I. General Considerations — Ceilings . . 73 „ II. Decorations of Walls . . . .83 CHAPTER V. Carpets ........... 94 CHAPTER VI. Curtain Materials, Hangings, and Woven Fabrics generally . . . 107 CHAPTER VII. Hollow Vessels — Division I. Pottery . . . . . . .117 „ II. Glass Vessels ...... 127 ,, III. MhTAL-WORK . ... . . .135 CHAPTER VIII. Hardware ........... 144 CHAPTER IX. Stained Glass .......... 153 CHAPTER X. Conclusion ........... 160 Principles of Design. CHAPTER I. Division I. There are many handicrafts in which a knowledge of the true principles of orna- mentation is almost essential to success, and there are few in which a knowledge of decorative laws cannot be utilised. The man who can form a bowl or a vase well is an artist, and so is the man who can make a beautiful chair or table. These are truths; but the converse of these facts is also true ; for if a man be not an artist he cannot form an elegant bowl, nor make a beautiful chair. At the very outset we must recognise the fact that the beautiful has a com- mercial or money value. We may even say that art can lend to an object a value greater than that of the material of which it consists, even when the object be formed of pi'ccious matter, as of rare marbles, scarce woods, or silver or gold. This being the case, it follows that the workman who can endow his productions with those qualities or beauties which give value to his works^ must be more useful to his employer than the man who produces objects devoid of such beauty, and his time must be of higher value than that of his less skilful companion. If a man, who has been born and brought up as a ''son of toil," has that laudable ambition which causes him to seek to rise al)ove his fellows by fairly becoming their superior, I would say to him that 1 know of no means of his so readily doing so, as by his acquainting himself with the laws of beauty, and studying till he learns to perceive the difference between the beautiful and the ugly, the graceful and the deformed, the refined and the coarse. To perceive delicate beauties is not by any means an easy task to those who have not devoted themselves to the consideration of the beautiful for a long period of time, and of this be assured, that what now appears to you to be beautiful, you may shortly regard as less so, and what now fails to attract you, may ultimately become charming to your eye. In your study of the beautiful, do not be led away by the false judgment of ignorant persons who may suppose themselves possessed of good taste. It is common to assume that women have better taste than men, and some women seem to consider themselves the possessors of even authorita- tive taste from which there can be no appeal. They may be right, only we must be pardoned for not accepting such authority, for should there be any over-estimation B 2 I'lllKCIPLES OF DESIGN. of the accuracy of this g-ood taste, serious loss of jn-ogress in art- judgment might result. It may be taken as an invariable truth that knowledge, and knowledge alone, can enable us to form an accurate judgment respecting- the beauty or want of beauty of an object, and he who has the greater knowledge of art can judge best of the ornamental qualities of an object. He who would judge rightly of art-works must have knowledge. Let him who would judge of beauty apjjly himself, then, to earnest study, for thereby he shall have wisdom, and by his wise reasonings he will be led to perceive beauty, and thus have opened to him a new source of pleasure. Art-knowledge is of value to the individual and to the country at large. To the individual it is riches and wealth, and to the nation it saves impoverishment. Take, for example, clay as a natural material: in the hands of one man this material becomes flower-pots, worth eight een-pence a "cast'''' (a number varying from sixty to tweVe according to size) ; in the hands of another it becomes a tazza, or a vase, worth five pounds, or perhaps fifty. It is the art which gives the value, and not the material. To the nation it saves impoverishment. A wise policy induces a country to draw to itself all the wenlth that it can, without parting with more of its natural material than is absolutely necessary. If for every pound of clay that a nation parts with, it can draw to itself that amount of gold which we value at five pounds sterling, it is obviously better thus to part with but little material and yet secure wealth, than it is to part with the material at a low rate either in its native condition, or worked into coarse vessels, thereby rendering a great impoverishment of the native resources of the country necessary in order to its wealth. Men of the lowest degree of intelligence can dig clay, iron, or copper, or quarry stone ; but these materials, if bearing the impress of mind, are ennobled and rendered valuable, and the more strongly the material is marked with this eimobling impress the more valuable it becomes. I must qualify my last statement, for there are possible cases in which the impress of mind may degrade rather than exalt, and take from rather than enhance, the value of a material. To ennoble, the mind must be noble ; if debased, it can only debase. Let the mind be refined and pure, and the more fully it impresses itself upon a material, the more lovely does the material become, for thereby it has received the impress of refinement and purity; but if the mind be debased and impure, the more does the matter to which its nature is transmitted become degraded. Let me have a sim^^le mass of clay as a candle-holder rather than the earthen candlestick which only presents such a form as is the natural outg-oing of a degraded mind. Thei-e is another reasc n why the material of which beautiful objects are formed ehould be of little intrinsic value besides that arising out of a consideration of the ECONOMY OF MATERIAL. 3 exhaustion of the country^ and this will lead us to see that it is desirable in all cases to form beautiful objects as far as possible of an inexpensive material. Clay, wood, iron, stone, are materials which may be fashioned into beautiful forms, but l^eware of silver, and of gold, and of precious stones. The most frag-ile material often endures for a long period of time, while the almost incorrosible silver and gold rarely escape the ruthless hand of the destroyer. " Beautiful though gold and silver are, and worthy, even though they were the commonest of things, to be fashioned into the most exqviisite devices, their money value makes them a perilous material for works of art. IIow many of the choicest relics of antiquity are lost to us, because they tempted the thief to steal them, and then to hide his theft by melting them ! How many imique designs in gold and silver have the vicissitudes of war reduced in fierce haste into money-changers' nuggets ! Where are Benvenuto Cellini's vases, Lorenzo Ghiberti's cups, or the silver lamps of Ghirlandajo ? Gone almost as com- pletely as Aaron's golden pot of manna, of which, for another reason than that which kept St. Paul silent, 'we cannot now speak particularly.' Nor is it only because this is a world ' where thieves break through and steal' that the fine gold becomes dim and the silver perishes. This, too, is a world where ' love is strong as death ; ' and what has not love— love of family, love of brother, love of child, love of lover — prompted man and woman to do with the costliest things, when they could be exchanged as mere bullion for the lives of those who w^ere beloved?"* Workmen ! it is fortunate for us that the best vehicles for art ai-e the least costly materials. Having matle these general remarks, I may explain to my readers what I am about to attempt in the little work which I have now commenced. My primary aim will be to bring about refinement of mind in all who may accompany me through my studies, so that they may individually be enabled to judge correctly of the nature of any decorated object, and enjoy its beauties — should it present any — and detect its fai;lts, if such be present. This refinement I shall attemj^t to bring about by presenting to the mind considerations which it must digest and assimilate, so that its new formations, if I may thus speak, may be of knowledge. We shall carefully consider certain general principles, which are either common to all fine arts or govern the production or arrangement of ornamental forms: then we shall notice the laws which regulate the combination of colours, and the application of colours to objects ; after which we shall review our various art-maiiufactures, and considerr art as associated with the manufacturing industries. We shall thus be led to consider furniture, earthenware, table and window glass, wall decorations, carpets, floor cloths, window-hangings, dress fabrics, works in silver and gold, hardware, and whatever * From a lecture by the late Professor George Wilson, of Edinburgh. 4 I'laXCIPLES OF DESIGN. is a combination of art and manufacture. I shall address myself^ then^ to the carpenter, the cabinet-maker, potter, glass-blower, paper-stainer, weaver and dyer, silversmith, blacksmith, g-as-finisher, designer, and all who are in any way engaged in the production of art-objects. But before we commence our regular work, let me say that without laborious study no satisfactory progress can be made. Labour is the means whereby we raise om'selves above our fellows ; labour is the means by which we arrive at aflluence. Think not that there is a royal road to success — the road is through toil. Deceive not yourself with the idea that you were born a genius — that you were born an artist. If you are endowed with a love for art, remember that it is by labour alone that you can get such knowledge as will enable you to present your art-ideas in a manner acceptable to refined and educated people. Be content, then, to labour. In the case of an individual, success ajipears to me to dejiend upon the time which he devotes to the study of that which he desires to master. One man works six hours a day ; another works eighteen. One has three days in one ; and what is the natural result ? Simply this — that the one who works the eighteen hours jirogresses with three times the rapidity of the one who only works six hours. It is true that indivi- duals differ in mental capacity, but my experience has led me to believe that those who work the hardest almost invariably succeed the best. ^Vhile I write, I have in my miud^s eye one or two on whom Nature appeared to have lavishly bestowed art-gifts ; yet these have made but little progress in life. I see, as it were, before me others who were less gifted by Nature, but who industriously jiersevered in their studies, and were content to labour for success; and these have achieved positions which the natural genius has failed even to approach. Workmen ! I am a worker, and a believer in the efficacy of work. We will commence our systematic course by observing that good ornament — good decorations of any character, have qualities which appeal to the educated, but are silent to the ignorant, and that these qualities make utterance of interesting facts ; but before we can rightly understand what I may term the hidden utterance of ornament, we must inquire into the general revelation which the ornament of any particular people, or of any historic age, makes to us, and also the utterances of individual forms. As an illustration of my meaning, let us take the ornament produced by the Egyptians. In order to see this it may be necessary that we visit a museum — ■ say the British Museum — where we search out the mummy-cases ; but as most provincial museums boast one or more mummy-cases, we are almost certain to find in the leading country towns illustrations that will serve our present purpose. On a mummy-case you may find a singular ornament, which is a conventional drawing of EGYPTIAN ORNAMENT. 5 Fig. 2. the Egyptian lotus, or blue water-lily* (see Fig-s. 1, -Z, 3), and in all iJrobability you will find this ornamental device repeated over and over again on the one mummy- case. Notice this peculiarity of the drawing o£ the lotus — a jiecidiarity common to Egyptian ornaments — that there is a severity, a rigidity of line, a sort of sternness about it. This rigidity or severity of drawing is a great peculiarity or charac- teristic of Egyptian draw- ing-. But mark ! with this severity there is alwa^'s coupled an amount of dignity, and in some cases this dignity is very ap- parent. Length of line, firmness of drawing, se- verity of form, and sub- tlety of curve are the great characteristics of Egyptian ornamentation. What does all this ex- press ? It expresses the character of the people who created the ornaments. The ornaments of the ancient Egyptians were all ordered by the priesthood, ami religion, but of the forms which their ornaments were to assume. Mark, then, the expressum of the severity of character and dignified bearing of the priesthood : in the very drawing of a simple flower we have presented to us the character of the men who brought about its production. But this is only what we are in the constant habit of witnessing. A man of knowledge imlllllHliimllllnilllimmiimmiillll !llt| Fi-. 3. * This can be seen fjrowing in the water-' anks in the Kew Gardens, conservatories, and in the Crystal Palace at Sydenham. 6 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN'. wi-ites with power and force; while the man of wavering opinions writes timidly and with feebleness. The force of the one character (which character has been ir.ade forcible by knowledg-e) and the ■weakness of the other is manifested by his written words. So it is with ornaments : power or feebleness of character is manifest by the forms produced. The Egyptians were a severe people ; they were hard task-masters. When a great work had to be performed^ a number of slaves were selected for the work, and a portion of food allotted to each, which was to last till the work was completed; and if the work was not finished when the food was consumed, the slaves perished. We do not wonder at the severity of Egyptian drawing. But the Egyptians were a noble people — noble in knowledge of the arts, noble in the erection of vast and massive buildings, noble in the greatness of their power. Hence we have nobility of drawing— power and dignity mingled with severity in every ornamental form which they produced. We have thus noticed the general utterance or expression of Egyptian drawing ; but what specific communication does this particular lotus make? Most of the ornaments of the Egyptians — whether the adornments of sarcophagi, of water- vessels, or mere charms to be worn i^endent from the neck — were symbols of some truth or dogma inculcated by the priests. Hence Egyptian ornament is said to be symbolic. The fertility of the Nile valley was chiefly due to the river annually overflowing its banks. In spreading over the land, the water carried with it a quantity of rich alluvial earth, which gave fecundity to the country on which it was deposited. When the water which had overspread the surrounding land had nearly subsided, the corn which was to produce the harvest was set by being cast upon the retiring water, through which it sank into the rich alluvial earth. The water being now well-nigh Avithin the river-banks, the first flower that sprang up was the lotus. This flower was to the Egyptians the harbinger of coming plenty, for it symbolised the springing forth of the wheat. It was the first flower of spring, or their primrose (first rose). The priesthood, perceiving the interest with which this flower was viewed, and the watchfulness manifested for its appearance, taught that in it abode a god, and that it must be worshipped. The acknowledgment of this flower as a fit and primary object of worship caused it to be delineated on the mummy-cases, and sarcophagi, and on all sacred edifices. We shall have frequent occasion, while considering decorative art, to notice symbolic forms; but we must not forget the fact that all good ornaments make utterance. Let us in all cases, when beholding them, give ear to their teachings ! Egyptian ornament is so full of forms which have interesting significance that I cannot forbear giving one other illustration ; and of this I am sure, that not only does a knowledge of the intention of each form employed in a decorative scheme EGYPTIAN ORNAMENT. 7 cause the beholder to receive a special amount of pleasure when viewing it, but also that without such knowledge no one can rightly judge of the nature of any ornamental work. There is a device in Egyptian ornament which the most casual observer cannot have failed to notice ; it is what is termed the " winged globes" and consists of a small ball or globe, immediately at the sides of which are two asps, and from which extend two wings, each wing being in length about live to eight times that of the diameter of the ball (Fig. 4). The drawing of this device is very grand. The force with which the wings are delineated well represents the powerful character of the protection which the kingdom of Egypt afforded, and which was symbolised by the extended and overshadowing pinions. I know of few instances where forms of an ornamental character have been combined in a manner either more quaint or more interesting than in the example before us. The composition presents a charm that few ornaments do, and is worthy Fig. 4. of careful consideration. But this ornament derives a very special and unusual interest when we consider its purpose, the blow which was once aimed at it, and the shock which its producers must have received, upon finding it powerless to act as they had taught, if not believed, it would. The priesthood instructed the people that this was the symbol of protection, and that it so effectually appealed to the preserving spirits that no evil could enter where it was portrayed. With the view of giving a secure protection to the inmates of Egyptian dwellings, this device, or symbol of protection, was ordered to be placed on the lintel (the post over the door) of every building of the Eg^'ptians, whether residence or temple. It was to nullify this symbol, and to show the vain character of the Egyptian gods, that Moses was commanded to have the blood of the lamb slain at the passover placed upon the lintel, in the very position of this winged globe. It was also enjoined as a further duty that the blood be sprinkled on the door-post ; but this was merely a new duty, tending further to show that even in position, as well as in nature, this winged globe was powerless to secure protection. This device, then, is of special interest, both as a symbolic ornament and as throwing light on Scripture history. Besides the two ornamental forms mentioned— /.e., the lotus and the winged globe— we might notice many others also of great interest, but our space will not 8 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGX. enable us to do so; further information may, however, be got from the South Kensington Museum library,* where several interesting works on Egyptian ornament maybe seen; — from the Grammar of Ornament" by Mr. Owen Jones, — the works on Egypt by Sir Gardiner Wilkinson ; and, especially, — by a visit to the Egyptian Court of the Crystal Palace at Sydenham, and by a careful perusal of the hand-book to that court.f Much might also be said respecting Egyptian architecture, but on this we can say little here ; yet, as the columns of the temples are of a very ornamental character, we may notice that in most cases they were formed of a bundle of papj'riisj stems bound together by thongs or strajjs — the heads of the plant forming the capital of the column, and the stems the shaft (Fig. 5). In some cases the lotus was sub- stituted for the papyrus ; and in other instances the palm-leaf was used in a similar way ; these modifications can be seen in the Egyptian Court at Sydenham with great advantage, and many varieties of form resulting from the use of the one plant, as of the papyrus, may also there be observed. We have here an opportunity of noticing how the mode of building, however simple or ^n'iniitive in character, first employed by a nation may become embodied in its ultimate architecture ; for, undoubtedly, the rude houses first erected in Egypt were formed largely of bundles of the papyrus, which were gathered from the river-side — for wood was rare in Egypt — and, ultimately, when buildings were formed of stone, an attempt was made at imitating in the new material the form which the old reeds presented. But mark, the imitation was no gross copy of the original work, but a well-considered and perfectly idealised work, substituting for the bundle of reeds a work having the true architectural qualities of a noble-looking and useful column. We must now pass from the ornament of the Egyptians to that of the Greeks, and here we meet with decorative forms Laving a different object and dil¥ei-ent aim from those already considei-ed. * Any person can have admission to the South Kensington Museum Art library and its Educational library, for a week, by payment of sixpence. t A hand-book to each of the historic courts erected in the Sydenham Palace was prepared at the time the courts were built. These are still to be got in the Literary department, in the north-east gallery of the building. They are all worthy of careful study. t The papyrus was the plant from which Egyptian paper was made. It was also the bulrush of the Scriptures, in which the infant Moses was found. Fig. 5. GEEEK ORNAMENT. 9 Egyptian ornament was symbolical in character. Its individual forms had specific meaninself of those forms to be S3en in certain bones of birds which are associated with the organs of flight, and which give us an impression of great strength, as well as those observable in the powerful propelling fins of certain species of fish. O PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. Fig. 12. UTILITY AND BEAUTY. 19 ultimately be set asidc^ and that which is more convenieut for use will replace it, even if the latter be without beauty. As an illustration of this fact, let us suppose the balustrade railings of a staircase very beautiful, and yet furnished with such projections as render it almost impossible that we walk up or down the stairs without tearing- the dress, or injuring- the person, and how soon will our admiration of the beautiful railing disappear, and even be replaced by hate ! In like manner let the handle of a door, or the head of a poker, be so formed as to hurt the hand, and the simple round knob, or round head, will be jDreferred to it, however ornamentally or beautifully formed. In relation to this subject. Professor George Wilson has said : " The conviction seems ineradicable from some minds, that a beautiful thing- cannot be a useful thing, and that the more you increase the beauty of the necessary furniture or the implements of every-day life the more you lessen their utility. Make the Queen's sceptre as beautiful as you please, but don't try to beautify a poker, especially in cold weather. My lady^s vinaigrette carve and gild as you will, but leave untouched my pewter ink-bottle. Put fine furniture, if you choose, into my drawing-room ; but I am a plaiii man, and like useful things in my parlour, and so on. Good folks of this sort seem to labour under the impression that the secret desire of art is to rob them of all comfort. Its unconfessed but actual aim, they believe, is to realise the faith of their childhood, when it was understood that a monarch always wore his crown, held an orb in one hand and a sceptre in the other, and a literal interpretation was put upon Shakespeare's words, " ' Uneasy lies the head that wearf? a crown.' Were art to prosper, farewell to fire-proof, shapeless slippers, which bask like salamanders unharmed in the hottest blaze. An aesthetic pair, modelled upon Cinderella's foot, and covered with snow-white embroidery, must take their j^lace, and dispense chilblains and frost-bite to miserable toes. Farewell to shooting-coats out a little at the elbows, to patched dressing-gowns, and hair-cloth sofas. Nothing but full-dress, varnished boots, spider-legged chairs, white satin chair-covers, alabaster ink-bottles, velvet door-mats, and scrapers of silver or gold. It is astonishing how many peojile think that a thing cannot be comfortable if it is beautiful. ... If there be one truth Avhich the Author of all has taught us in his works more clearly than another, it is the perfect compatibility of the highest utility with the greatest beauty. I offer you one example. All are familiar with the beautiful shell of the nautilus. Give the nautilus itself to a mathematician, and he will show you that one secret of its gracefulness lies in its following in its volute or whorl a particular geometrical curve with rigid precision. Pass it from the mathematician to the natural philosopher, and he will show you how the simj^le superposition of a great number of very thin transparent plates, and the close 20 PKINCIPLES OF DESIGN. approximation of a multitude of very fine eng-raved lines, are the cause of its exquisite pearly lustre. Pass it from the natural philosopher to the engineer, and he will show you that this fairy shell is a most perfect practical machine, at once a sailing vessel and a diving-bell, in which its living possessor had, centuries before Archimedes, applied to utilitarian ends the law of specific gravity, and centuries before Halley had dived in his bell to the bottom of the sea. Pass it from the engineer to the anatomist, and he will show you how, without marring its beauty, it is occupied during its lifetime with a most orderly system of rowing and sailing tackle, chambers for food, pumps to hce]) bhjod circulating, ventilating apparatus, and hands to control all, so that it is a model ship with a model mariner on board. Pass it lastly from the anatomist to the chemist, and he will show you that every part of the shell and the creature is compounded of elements, the relative weights of which follow in each individual nautilus the same numerically identical ratio. " Such is the nautilus, a thing- so graceful, that when we look at it we are content to say with Keats — " ' A thing of beauty is a joy for ever and yet a thing so thoroughly utilitarian, and fulfilling with the utmost perfection the purely practical aim of its construction, that our shipbuilders would be only too thankful if, thoug-h sacrificing all beauty, they could make their vessels fulfil their business ends half so well." Viewing our siiliject in another light, and with special reference to architecture, we notice that unless a building is fitted for the purpose intended, or, in other words, answers utilitarian ends, it cannot be esteemed as it otherwise might be, even though it be of great {esthetic beauty. In respect to this subject, Mr. Owen Jones has said : " The nave and aisles of a Gothic church become absurd when filled with pews for Protestant worship, where all are required to see and hear. The columns of the nave which impede sight and sound, the aisles for processions which no longer exist, rood screens, and deep chancels for the concealment of mysteries, now no longer such, are all so many useless reproductions which must be thrown aside." Further, "As architecture, so all works of the decorative arts, s// oh id possess fitness, proportion, harmony; the result of all which is repose." Sir M. Digby Wyatt has said: " Infinite variety and imei-ring fitness govern all forms in Nature." Vitruvius, that " The perfection of all works depends on their fitness to answer the end proposed, and on principles resulting from a consideration of Nature itself." Sir Charles L. Eastlake, that " In every case in Nature where fitness or utility can be traced, the characteristic quality, or relative beauty, is found to be identical with that of fitness." A. "W. Pugin (the father) : " How many objects of ordinary use are rendered monstrous and ridiculous simply because the artist, instead of seeking the most convenient form, and then decorating it, has embodied some extravagance to ADAPTATION TO PURPOSE. 21 conceal the real purpose for which the article has been made." And with the view of pointing out how fitness for, or adaptation to, the end proposed is manifested in the structure and disposition upon the earth of plants, I have written in a little work now out of print : " Tlie trees which grow highest upon the mountains, and the plants which grow wpon the unsheltered plain, have usually long, narrow, and rigid leaves, which, owing to their form, are enabled to bear the fury of the tempest, to which they are exposed, without injury. This is seen in the case of the species of fir which grow at great altitudes, where the leaves are more like needles than leaves such as commonly occur ; and also in the species of heath which grow upon exposed moors : in both cases the plants are, owing to the form of the leaf, enabled to defy the blast, while those with broad leaves would be shattered and destroyed. " Not only is the form of leaf such as fits these plants to dwell in such inhospitable regions, but other circumstances also tend to this result. The stems are in both cases woody and flexible, so that while they bend to the wind they resist its destroying influence by their strength and elasticity. In relation to the stem of the papyrus," which is a plant constantly met with in Egyptian ornaments, " the late Sir W. J. Hooker mentions an interesting fact which manifests adaptation to its position. This plant grows in water, and attaches itself to the margins of rivers and streams, by sending forth roots and evolving long underground stems in the alluvium of the sides of the waters. Owing to its position it is exposed to the influences of the current, which it has to withstand, and this it does, not only by having its stems of a triangular form — a shape well adapted for withstanding pressure — but also by having them so placed in relation to the direction of the stream, that one angle always meets the current, and thus separates the waters as does the bow of a modern steam-ship." I might multi2)ly illustrations of this principle of fitness, or adaptation to purpose, as manifested in plants, to an almost indefinite extent ; but when all had been said we should yet have but the simple truth before us, that the chief end which we should have in creating any object, is that of rendering it perfectly fitted to answer the proposed end. If those works which are beautiful were but invariably useful, as they should be ; if those objects which are most beautiful were also the most convenient — and there is no reason why they should not be so — how the beautiful would become loved and sought after ! Cost would be of little moment, the price would not be complained of, if beautiful objects were works of perfect utility. But, alas ! it is far otherwise : that which is useful is often ugly, and that which is beautiful is often inconvenient to use. This very fact has given rise to the highly absurd fashion of having a second poker in a drawing-room set of fire-irons. The one poker is ornamental, possibly, but it is to be looked at ; the other is for use, and as it is not to be looked at, it is hidden away in some corner, or close within the fender. I do not wonder at the second poker being required ; for 22 PIUNCIPLES OF DESIGN. nineteen out of every twenty pokers of an ornamental (?) character which I have seen during the last few years would hurt the hand so insufferably if they were used to break a lump of coal with, that it would be almost impossible to employ them constantly for such a purpose. But why not abolish the detestable thing altogether ? If the poker is to be retained as an ornament, place it on the table or chimney-piece of your drawing-room, and not down on the hearth, where it is at such a distance from the eye that its beauties cannot be discovered. It is no use saying it would be out of place in such a position. If to poke the fire with, its place is within the fender ; if it is an ornament, it should be placed where it can be best seen — in a glass case, if worthy of protection. I hope that sufficient has now been said upon this all-important necessity, that if an object is to be beautiful it should also be useful, to cause us to consider it as a primary princij^le of design that all objects which we create mnsi be useful. To this as a first law we shall constantly have to refer. When we construct a chair we shall ask, is it useful ? is it strong ? is it properly put together ? could it be stronger without using more, or anothei", material ? and then we should consider whether it is beautiful. When we design a bottle we shall inquire, is it useful ? is it all that a bottle should be ? could it be ' more useful ? and then, is it beautiful ? When we create a gas-branch we shall ask, does it fulfil all requirements, and perfectly answer the end for which it is intended? and then, is it beautiful? And in relation to jjatterns merely we shall also have to make similar inquiries. Thus, if drawing a carpet design, we shall inquire, is this form of ornament suitable to a woven fabric ? is it suitable to the particular fabric for which it is intended ? is the particular treat- ment of the ornament which we have adopted the best possible when w'e bear in mind that the carpet has to be walked over, as it is to act in relation to our furniture as a background does to a picture, and is to be viewed at some distance from the eye ? and then, is it beautiful ? Such inquiries w« shall put respecting any object the formation of which we may suggest : hence, in all our inquiries, I shall, as I love art, consider utility before beauty, in order that my art may be fostered and not despised. There are many subjects yet not named in these pages which we ought to consider, but I must content myself by merely mentioning them, and you must be willing to think of them, and consider them with such care as their importance may demand. Some of them, however, we shall refer to when considering the various manufactures. A principle of great importance in respect to design is, that i//e material of which an ohject is formed should be used in a manner consistent with its oicn nature, and in that particular wai/ in which it can he most easily "worked." Another principle of equal importance with that just set forth, is this : that when an object is about to be formed, that material (or those materials) which is (or are) most appropriate to its formation should be sought and employed. These two CURVES, PROPORTION, ORDER, REPETITION. '23 propositions are of very great importance, and the principles which they set forth should never be lost sight of by the designer. They involve the first principles of successful designing, for if ignored the work produced cannot be satisfactory. Curves will be found to le leautiful just as theij are subtle in character ; those which are most subtle in character being most beautiful. The arc is the least beautiful of curves (I do not here speak of a circle, but of the line, as a line, which bounds the circle) ; being struck from one centre its origin is instantly detected, while the mind requires that a line, the contemplation of which shall be pleasurable, must be in advance of its knowledge, and call into activity its powers of inquiry. The elliptic curve, or curve bounding the ellipse, is more beautiful than the arc, for its origin is not so strikingly apparent, being formed from two centres. The curve of the egg is more beautiful still, being formed from three centres.* As the number of centres necessary to the formation of a cui've increases, the difficulty of detecting its origin also becomes greater, and the variety which' the curve presents is also proportionally great; the variety being obviously greater as the number of the centres from which it is struck is increased. Proportion, like the curve, must be of a subtle nature. A surface must never be divided for the purpose of decoration into halves. The propoi'tion of 1 to 1 is bad. As proportion increases in subtlety it also increases in beauty. The proportion of 2 to 1 is little better ; the proportion of 3 to 8, or of 5 to 8, or of 5 to 13, is, however, good, the last named being the best of those which I have adduced ; for the pleasure derived from the contemplation of proportion increases with the difficulty of detecting it. This principle is true in relation to the division of a mass into primary segments, and of primary segments into secondary forms, as well as in relation to the grouping together of parts of various sizes ; hence it is worthy of special note. A pi'inciple of order must prevail in ererij ornamental composition. Confusion is the result of accident, while order results from thought and care. The operation of mind cannot well be set forth in the absence of this principle ; at least, the presence of a principle of order renders the operation of mind at once manifest. The orderly repetition of parts frequently aids in the production of ornamental effects. The kaleidoscope affords a wonderful example of what repetition will do. The mere fragments of glass which we view in this instrument would altogether fail to please were they not repeated with regularity. Of themselves repetition and order can do much. (Figs. 13 and 14.) * The ellipse and egg-shape here spoken of are not those which are struck by compasses in any way, for the curves of such figures are merely combined arcs, but such as are struck with string, or a "tramel." 24 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. Alternation is a j^inci^de of jprinLarij iiiijjortance in certain ornamental com- positions. In the ease of a flower (as the buttercup, or chickweed, for example) the coloured leaves do not fall over the green leaves (the petals do not fall over the Fig. 14. - Fiff. 16. sepals), but between them — they alternate with them. This pruiciple is not only manifested in plants, but also in many ornaments produced m the best periods of art (Fig. 15). If plants arc employed as ornaments the// must not he treated imitatirelij, hut must be conventionally treated, or rendered into ornaments (Fig. 10). A monkey can imitate, man can create. KASTERK GROTESQUES. ■25 These are the chief principles which we shall have to notice, as involved in the production of ornamental designs. Division III. Some other principles of a less noble character than those which we have already noticed as entering into ornament yet remain to be mentioned. Man will be amused as well as instructed; he must be pleased as well as ennobled by what he sees. I hold it as a first principle that ornamentation, as a true fine art, can administer to man in all his varying moods, and under all phases of feeling. Decoration, if properly understood, would at once be seen to be a high art in the truest sense of the word, as it can teach, elevate, refine, induce lofty aspirations, and allay sorrows ; but we have now to notice it as a fine art, administering to man in his various moods, rather than as the handmaid to relig'ion or morals. Humour seems to be as much an attribute of our nature as love, and, like it, varies in intensity with different individuals. There are few in whom there is not a certain amount of humour, and in some this one quality predominates over all others. It not unfrequently happens that men who ai'e great thinkers are also great humorists — great talent and great humour being often combined in the one individual. Tlie feeling for humour is ministered to in ornament by the grotesque, and the grotesque occurs in the works of almost all ages and all peoples. The ancient Egyptians employed it, so did the Assyrians, the Greeks, and the Romans ; but none of these nations used it to the extent of the artists of the Celtic, Byzantine, and " Gothic " periods. Hideous " evil spirits " were portrayed on the outside of almost every Christian edifice at one time, and much of the Celtic ornament produced by the early monks consisted of an anastomosis, or network, of grotesque creatures. The old Irish crosses were enriched with this kind of ornamentation,* and some of the decorative embellishments of these works are of extraordinary interest ; but those who have access to the beautiful work of Professor Westwood on Celtic manu- scripts will there see this grotesque form of ornament to perfection. As regards the Eastern nations, while nearly all have employed the grotesque as an element of decorative art, the Chinese and Japanese have employed it most largely, and for it they manifest a most decided partiality. The drawings of dragons, celestial lions (always spotted), mythical birds, beasts, fishes, insects, and other supposed inhabi- tants of the Elysian plains, which these people produce, are most interesting and extraordinary. Without in any way going into a history of the grotesque, let us look at the characteristic forms which it has assumed, and what is necessary to its successful * Casts of one or two of these can be cccn in the central transept of the Crystal Palace at Sydenham. E 26 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. production. We have said that the grotesque in ornament is the analogue of humour in literature. This is the case ; but the grotesque may represent the truly horrible or repellent, and be simply repulsive. This form is so seldom required in ornamentation that I shall not dwell upon it, and when required it should always be associated with power ; for if the horrible is feeble it cannot be corrective, but only revolting, like a miserable deformed animal. I think it may be taken as a principle, that the further the grotesque is removed from an imitation of a natural object the better it is, provided that it be energetic and vigorous — lifelike. Nothing is worse Fig. 17. Fig. 18. than a feeble joke, unless it be a feeble grotesque. The amusing must appear to be earnest. In connection with this subject I give here a series of grotesques, with the view of illustrating my meaning, and I would fain give more, but space will not permit me to do so. The initial letter S, formed of a bird, is a characteristic Celtic grotesque (Fig. 17). It is quaint and interesting, and is sufficiently unlike a living creature to avoid giving any sense of pain to the beholder, while it is yet in a most unnatural position. It is, in truth, rather an ornament than a copy of a living creature, yet NATURE OF GROTESQUES. 27 Fig. 19. it is so suggestive as to call forth the thought of a bird. It should be noticed, in connection with this figure, that the interstices between certain portions of the creature are filled by a knot. This is well — the whole thing being an ornament, and not a naturalistic repre- sentation. Fig. 18 is a Siamese grotesque head, and a fine sample it is of the curious form of ornament which it represents. Mark, it is in no way a copy of a human head, but is a true orna- ment, with its parts so ar- ranged as to call up the idea of a face, and nothing more. Notice the volutes forming the chin ; the grotesque, yet highly ornamental, lines forming the mouth and the upper boundary of the fore- head, and the flambeauant ears ; the whole thing is worthy of the most careful study. Fig. 19 is a Gothic foli- ated face ; but here we have features which are much too naturalistic. We have, in- deed, only a hideous human face with a marginal ex- crescence of leafage. This is a type to be avoided; it is not droll, nor quaint ; but is simply unpleasant to look upon. Fig. 20 is a fish, with the feeling of the grotesques of the Middle Ages, a good type, being truly ornamental, and yet sufficiently suggestive. In order that I convey to the reader a fuller idea of my views respecting the Fig. 20. It is 28 PIUNCIPLES Ol'' DESIGN. grotesque than I otherwise could, I have sketched one or two orig-inal ilhistrations — • Fig-. 21 being- sug-g-estive o£ a face, Fig. 22 of a skeleton (old bogey), and Fig. 23 of an impossible animal. They are inten- tionally far from imitative. If naturalistic some w^ould awaken a sense of pain, as they are contorted into curious positions, whereas that which induces no thoug-ht of feelina- induces no sense of pain. Of all grotesques with which I am ac- quainted, the di-agons of the Chinese and Fig. 21. Japanese are those which represent a com- bination of power, vigour, energy, and passion most fully. This is to be accounted for by the fact that these peoples are believers in dragons. When the sun or moon is eclipsed they believe that the luminous orb has ben swallowed by some fierce monster, which they give form to in the dragon, and upon the occurrence of such a phenomenon they, with cans and kettles, make rough music, and thus cause the monster to disgorge the luminary, the brilliancy of which it would otherwise have for ever extinguished. I can understand a believer in dragons drawing* these monsters with the power and spirit that the Chinese and Japanese do; but I can scarcely imagine that a disbeliever could do so — a man's very nature must be saturated wdth a belief in their existence and mischievous power, in order that he embody in his delineation such expres- Tig, 22. HUMOUR IN ORNAMENT. 29 sion o£ the assumed character of this imaytuary creature as do the Cliinese and Japanese. Although I am not now considering the struc- ture of objects, I may say that the grotesque should frequently be used where we meet with naturalistic imitations. We not unfre- quently see a figure, naturally imitated, placed as a support to a superincumbent weight — a female figure as an architectural pillar bearing the weight of the entab- lature above, men crouched in the most painful positions supporting the bowl of some colossal fountain. Natural- istic figui'es in such positions are simply revolting, how- ever perfect as works of sculpture. If weight has to be supported by that which has a resemblance to a living creature of any kind, the semblance should only be suggested ; and the more unreal and woodeny (if I may make such a word) the support, if possessing the quaintness and humour of a true grotesque, the better. It is not the business of the ornamentist to pro- duce that which shall induce the feeling of continued pain, unless there is some exceptional reason for his so doing, and such a reason is of rare occurrence. 9 * CHAPTER II. COLOUR. Having considered some of the chief princijiles involved in the production of decorative design so far as " expression " goes^ we come to notice that constant adjunct of form which has ever played an important part in all decorative schemes ■ — namely, colour. Form can exist independently of colour, but it never has had any important development without the chromatic adjunct. From a consideration of history, we should be led to conclude that form alone is incapable of yielding such enrichments as satisfy ; for no national system of decoration has ever existed in the absence of colour. Mere outline-form may be good, but it is not satisfying ; mere light and shade may be pleasing, but it is not aU that we require. With form our very nature seems to demand colour ; and it is only when we get well-proportioned forms which are graceful, or noble, or vigorous, in combination with colours harmoniously arranged, that we are satisfied. Possibly this feeling results from our contact with nature. The flowers appear in a thousand hues, and the hills are of ever-varying tints. What a barren world ours would appear, were the ground, the hills, the trees and the flowers, the sky and the waters all of one colour ! Form we should have, and that in its richest variety ; light and shade we should have, with ever-varying intensity and change ; but colour would be gone. There would be no green to cheer, no blue to soothe, no red to excite ; and, indeed, there would be a deadness, although the world be full of life, so appalling that we can scarcely conceive of it, and cannot feel it. Colour alone seems to have greater charms than form alone. A sunset is entrancing when the sky glows with radiant hues; the blue is almost lost in red, the yellow is as a sea of transparent gold, and the whole presents a variety and blending of tints which charm, and soothe, and lull to reverie; and yet all form is indistinct and obscure. If so charming when separate from form, what is colour when properly combined with beautiful shapes ? It is difficult, indeed, for many of those for whom I write to answer this question, even by a mental conception, save by reference to nature ; for I could scarcely point to a single building in England which would be in any way a satisfactory illustration of what may be done by the combination of forms and colours. There is a beauty in Art which we in England do not even know of : it does not exist around us, it is little talked of, rarely thought about, and never seen. A decorator is called in to beautify a house, and OBJECT OF APPLYING COLOUR. 31 yet not one in fifty of the so-called decorators know even the first principles of their art, and would not believe were they told of the power of the art which they employ. They place on the walls a few sickly tints — so pale that their want of^ harmony is not very apparent. The colours of the wall become the colours of the cornice and of the doors, because they know not how to produce a harmony of hues ; and the result is a house which may be clean, but which is in every other respect an offence against good taste. I do not wonder that persons here in England do not care to have their houses " decorated," nor do I wonder at their not appreciating the " decorations " when they are done. Colour, lovely colour, of itself would make our rooms charming. There are few objects to which colour may not be applied, and many articles which are now colourless might be coloured with advantage. Our reasons for apply- ing colour to objects are twofold, and here, in fact, we see its true use. 1st. Colour lends to objects a new charm — a charm which they would not possess if without it ; and, 2nd, Colour assists in the sejjaration of objects and parts of objects, and thus gives assistance to form. These, theji, are the two objects of colour. Mark, first, it is to bestow on objects a charm, such as they could not have in its absence. In the hands of the man of knowledge it will do so — it will make an object lovely or lovable, but the mere application of colour will not do this. Colour may be so applied to objects as to render them infinitely more ugly than they were without it. I have seen many a bowl so coloured at our potteries as to be much less satisfactory when coloured than when white — the colouring having marred, rather than improved, its general effect. Here, again, it is knowledge that we want. Knowledge will enable us to transmute base materials into works of marvellous beauty, worth their weight in gold. Knowledge, then, is the true philosopher's stone ; for, we may almost say, if possessed by the artist it does enable him to transmute the baser metals into gold. But a little knowledge will not do this. In order that we produce true beauty, we require much knowledge, and this can only be got by constant and diligent labour, as I have before said ; but the end to be gained is worth the plodding toil. Believe me, there is a pleasure in seeing your works develop as things of beauty, delighting all who see them — not the illiterate only, but also the educated thinker — such as woi'ds fail to express. Although there is no royal road to art-power, and although the road is long, and lies through much toil and many difficulties, yet as you proceed there is pleasui-e in feeling that one obstacle after another is cleared from your path, and at the end there is inexpressible satisfaction. The second object of colour is that of assisting in the separation of form. If objects are placed near to one another, and these objects are all of the same colour, the beholder will have much more diificulty in seeing the boundaries or terminations of each than he would were they variously coloured; he would have to come nearer to them in order to see the limits of each, were all 3Z PRINCirLES OF DESIGN. coloured in the same manner, than he would were they variously coloured : thus colour assists in the separation of form. This quality which colour has of separating forms is often lost sight of, and much confusion thereby results. If it is worth while to produce a decorative form, it is worth while to render it visible ; and yet, how much ornament, and even good ornament, is lost to the eye through not being ren- dered manifest by colour ! Colour is the means by which we render form apparent. Colours, when placed together, can only please and satisfy the educated when combined harmoniously, or according to the laws of harmony. What, then, are the laws which govern the arrangement of colours ? and how are they to be applied ? We shall endeavour to answer these questions by making a series of statements in axiomatic form, and then we shall enlarge upon these propositions. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS. 1. Hcgarded from an art point of view, there are but three colours — i.e., blue, red, and yellow. 2. Blue, red, and yellow have been termed primary colours ; they cannot be formed by the admixture of any other colours. 3. All colours, other than blue, red, and yellow, result from the admixture of the primary colours. 4. By the admixture of blue and red, purple is formed; by the admixture of red and yellow, orange is formed ; and by the admixture of yellow and blue, green is formed. 5. Colours resulting from the admixture of two primary coloui-s are termed secondarij : hence purple, orange, and green are secondary colours. 6. By the admixture of two secondary colours a tertiary colour is formed : thus, purple and orange produce russet (the red tei'tiary) ; orange and green produce citrine (the yellow tertiary) ; and green and purple, olive (the blue tertiary); russet, citrine, and olive are the three tertiary colours. CONTRAST. 7. When a light colour is juxtaposed to a dark colour, the light colour appears lighter than it is, and the dark colour darker.* 8. When colours are juxtaposed, they become influenced as to their hue. Thus, when red and green are placed side by side, the red aj)pears redder than it actually is, and the green greener ; and when blue and black are juxtaposed, the blue mani- fests but little alteration, while the black assumes an orange tint or becomes "rusty." 9. No one coloiir can be viewed by the eye without another being created. Thus, if red is viewed, the eye creates for itself green, and this green is cast upon * If a dark grey tint be mixed upon a white slab it will appear dark in contrast with the white, but if a small portion of this same grey is applied to black paper it will appear almost white. COLOUR — CONTRAST AND HARMONY. 33 whatever is near. If it views green^ red is in like manner created and cast upon adjacent objects ; thus, if red and green are juxtaposed, each creates the other in the eye, and the red created by the green is cast upon the red, and the green created by the red is cast upon the green ; and the red and the green become improved by being juxtaposed. The eye also demands the presence of the three primary colours, either in their pm-ity or in combination ; and if these are not present, whatever is deficient will be created in the eye, and this induced colour will be cast upon what- ever is near. Thus, when we view blue, orange, which is a mixture of red and yellow, is created in the eye, and this colour is cast upon whatever is near; if black is in juxtaposition with the blue, this orange is cast upon it, and gives to it an orange tint, thus causing it to look " rusty.^' 10. In like manner, if we look upon red, green is formed in the eye, and is cast upon adjacent colours ; or, if we look upon yellow, purple is formed. HARMONY. 11. Harmony results from an agreeable contrast. 12. Colours which perfectly harmonise improve one another to the utmost. 13. In order to perfect harmony, the three colours are necessary, either in their purity or in combination. 14. Red and green combine to yield a harmony. Red is a primary colour, and green, which is a secondary colour, consists of blue and yellow — ^the other two primary colours. Blue and orange also produce a harmony, and yellow and purple, for in each case the three primary colours are present. 15. It has been found that the primary colours in perfect purity produce exact harmonies in the proportions of eight parts of blue, 5 of red, and 3 of yellow ; that the secondary colours harmonise in the proportions of 13 of purple, 11 of green, and 8 of orange ; and that the tertiary colours harmonise in the proportions of olive 24, russet 21, and citrine 19. 16. There are, however, subtleties of harmony which it is difficult to understand. 17. The rarest harmonies frequently lie close on the verge of discord. 18. Harmony of colour is, in many respects, analogous to harmony of musical sounds. QUALITIES OF COLOURS. 19. Blue is a cold colour, and appears to recede from the eye. 20. Red is a warm colour, and is exciting ; it remains stationary as to distance. 21. Yellow is the colour most nearly allied to light ; it appears to advance towards the spectator. 22. At twilight blue appears much lighter than it is, red much darker, and yellow slightly darker. By ordinary gaslight blue becomes darker, red brighter, and yellow lighter. By this artificial light a pure yellow appears lighter than white itself, when viewed in contrast with certain other colours. V 34 PUmCIPLES OF DESIGN. 23. By certain combinations colour may make glad or depress, convey the idea of purity, richness, or poverty, or may affect the mind in any desired manner, as does music. TEACHINGS OF EXPERIENCE. 24. When a colour is placed on a gold ground, it should be outlined with a darker shade of its own colour. 25. When a gold ornament falls on a coloured ground, it should be outlined with black. 26. When an ornament falls on a ground which is in direct harmony with it, it must be outlined with a lighter tint of its own colour. Thus, when a red ornament falls on a green ground, the ornament must be outlined with a lighter red. 27. When the ornament and the ground are in two tints of the same colour, if the ornament is dai-ker than the ground, it will require outlining with a still darker tint of the same colour ; but if lighter than the ground no outline will be required. ANALYTICAL TABLES OF COLOUR. WTien commencing my studies both in science and art, I found great advantage from reducing all facts to a tabular form so far as possible, and this mode of study I would recommend to others. To me this method appears to have great advantages, for by it we see at a glance what otherwise is difficult to understand ; if carefully done, it becomes an analysis of work ; and by preparing these tabular arrangements of facts the subject becomes impressed on the mind, and the relation of one fact to another, or of one part of a scheme to another, is seen. The following analytical tables will illustrate many of the facts stated in our propositions. The figures which follow the colours represent the proportions in which tliey harmonise : — • Primary Colours. Secondary Colours. Tertiary Colours. Blue . . 8 Pnrple . . 13 Olive . . 21 Eed . . 5 Green . . 11 Eusset . . 21 Yellow . . 3 Orange . . 8 Citrine . . 19 Primary Colour!^. Secondary Colours. Tertiary Colours. Eed . Yellow Bine . Yellow Blue . Eed . Eed . I Orange . . . 8 | , Citrine, or Yellow Tertiary 19 [• Green . . ■ H ) Yellow 3) Blue . ?J Purple ... 13 Orange ... 8 Eusset, or Eed Tertiary . 21 ,, ■ or Green . . 11 ) ^'^''o^^ • ^ Olive, or Bhxo Tertiary . 24 Blue . . 8f -p , ,o 1 Eed . . 5| ^'^'■P''^ • • • \ COLOl'R PROPORTIONS THAT HARMONISE. This latter table shows at a glance how each of the secondary and tertiary colours is formed, and the proportions in which they harmonise. It also shows why the three tertiary colours are called respectively the yellow tertiary, the red tertiary, and the hhie tertiary, for into each tertiary two e(iuivalents* of one primary enter, and one equivalent of each of the other primaries. Thus, in citrine we find two equivalents of yellow, and one each of red and blue ; hence it is the yellow tertiary. In russet we find two equivalents of red, and one each of blue and of yellow ; and in olive two of blue, and one each of red and yellow. Hence they are respectively tljp red and blue tertiaries. BLUE 8. PURPLE 13. PURPLE 13 GRE^N 11, OLIVE 24. RUSSET 21. RED 5. YELLOW 3. GREEN II. ORANGE 8. ORANGE 8. Fig. 24. CITRINE 19. Fig. 25. Figs 24 and 25 are diagrams of harmony. I have connected in the centre, by three similar lines, the colours which form a harmony; thus, blue, red, and yellow harmonise when j)laced together. Purple, green, and orange also harmonise (I have connected them by dotted lines in the first of the two diagrams). But when two colours are to produce a harmony, the one will bo a primary colour, and the other a secondary formed of the other two ])rimary colours (for the ])resence of the three primary colours is necessary to a harmony), or the one will be a secondary, and the other a tertiary colour formed of the two remaining secondary colours. Such harmonies I have j)laced opposite to each other ; thus blue, a primary, harmonists with orange, a secondary ; yellow with purple ; and red with green ; and the secondary colour is placed between the two primary colours of which it is formed; thus, orange is formed of red and yellow, between which it stands; green, of blue and yellow; and purple, of blue and red. In the second of the two diagrams we see that jwrijle, green, and orange produce a harmony, so do olive, russet, and citrine. We also see that purple and citrine harmonise, and green and russet, and orange and olive. Continuing this diagrammatic form of illustration, we may set forth the quantities in which the various colours harmonise : thus : — * An equivalent of blue is 8, of red 5, of yellov,- S. 36 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. Blue. O O O O O O O O Bed. O O O O O Yellow. O O O Blue. O O O O O O O O Bed. O O O O O Yelloiv. o o o harmonises with harmonises with harmonises with Orange. O O O O O O O O Green. o o o o o o o o o o Purple. O O O O O O O O O O O O O Purple. Citrine. O O O O harmonises with O O O O OOOO OOOO OOOO OOOO O OOOO O O O Green. Bussrt. OOOO harmonises with OOOO OOOO OOOO GOO OOOO OOOO OOOO o Orange. Olive. OOOO ' harmonises with OOOO OOOO OOOO OOOO OOOO OOOO OOOO To those who are about to practise ornamentation^ it is very important that they have in the mind's eye a tolerably accurate idea of the relative quantities of the various colours necessary to harmony, even where the colours are considered as existing in a state of absolute purity. We have rarely, however, to use the brightest blues, reds, and yellows which pigments furnish, and even these are but poor representatives of the potent colours of Kght as seen in the rainbow, and with TRUE COLOURS AND PIGMENTS. 37 the agency o£ the pi'ism ; nevertheless, a knowledge of the quantities in which these pure colours harmonise is very desirable. The proportions in which we have stated • that colours perfectly harmonise, and in which the primary colours combine to form the secondaries, and the secondaries the tertiaries, are given in respect to the colours of light, and not of pigments or paints, which, as we have just said, are more or less base representatives of the pure colours of light. Yet certain pigments may, for our purpose, be regarded as representing pure colours. Thus, the purest real ultramarine we will regard as blue (cobalt is rather green, that is, it has a little yellow in it, and the French and German ultramarines are generally rather purj^le, or have a little red in them, yet the best of these latter is a tolerably pure colour) , the purest French carmine as red (common carmine is frequently rather crimson, that is, has blue in itj vermilion is much too yellow), and lemon-chrome as yellow (the chrome selected must be without any green shade, and without any orange shade, however slight) ; and these pigments will be found to represent the colours of the prism as nearly as any that can be found. I would recommend the learner to get a small quantity of these colours in their powder form, substituting the best pale German ultramarine for real ultramarine, as the latter is of high price,* and to fill the various circles of our diagrams, which represent the primary colours, with these pigments, mixing them with a little dissolved gum arable and water — just sufficient to prevent the colours from rubbing ofE the paper. The secondary colours will be fairly represented by pale-green lake, often called drop-green, by orange-chrome — that of about the colour of a ripe, rather deep-coloured, orange-rind — and the purjile by the admixture of pale German ultramarine and crimson-lake, in about equal proportions, with a little white to bring it to the same depth as the green. I cannot name any pigments which would well represent the tertiary colours. Citrine is about the colour of candied lemo7i-j)GQ[ ; olive about the colour of candied citron-peel, and russet is often seen on the skin of certain apples called "russet apples," in the form of a slight roughness; but this russet is in many cases not quite sufficiently red to represent the colour bearing the same name. Iron rust is rather too yellow. This colour should bear the same relation to red that the candied lemon-peel does to yellow. If the student will try carefully to realise these colours, and will fill up the circles in our diagrams with them, he will thereby be much assisted in his studies; but it will be still better if he prepare fresh diagrams on a larger scale, and use squares instead of circles. I should recommend, and that I do strongly, that the * Real ultramarine is sold at .£8 per ounce. The best imitation, or German ultramarine, is procurable at any oil-shop at about 3s. to 4s. per pound. The best carmine should be procurable at 6s. per ounce, but artists' colourmen often charge .£1 Is., owing to the small demand for this pigment. The best chrome yeUow (chrome yellow is kept in many shades) is about Is. 6d. per pound. PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. student work out all the diagrams which I have suggested on a tolerably large ' scale^ using the colours where I have used words. I should also advise him to do an ornament, say in red on a gold ground, and outline this red ornament with a deeper red ; to do a gold ornament on a coloured ground, and outline it with black ; and indeed to carefully work out an ornamental illustration of our propositions, Nos. 24, 25, 26, and 27, and to keep these before him till he is so impressed by them as to feel the principle which they set forth. This should be done on a large scale in all our designing-rooms and art-workshops. As we shall have to refer to colours by naming pigments, and as I am constantly asked what pigments I employ, I shall enumerate the paints in my colour-box ; but I shall place a dagger against those which I have in my private box, and which I do not supply in my offices ; but these I seldom use. Of yellows I have fking's yellow (not a permanent colour), fvery pale chrome, lemon-chrome (about the colour of a ripe lemon), middle-chrome (half-way between the lemon and orange-chrome), orange-chrome (about the colour of the rind of a ripe orange), tyellow-lake, flndian yellow. Of reds — vermilion, carmine, crimson-lake. Of blues — fcobalt, German ultramarine, both deeji and pale, Antwerp blue, indigo. Of greens — emerald, green -lake, pale and deep. Of browois — raw Turkey umber, Vandyke, Venetian red, purple-brown, brown-lake. Besides these I have what is called celestial blue, which is a very jjure and intense turquoise, vegetable black, flake white, and gold bronze.* There are certain facts connected with the mixing of colours which must never be lost sight of ; thus, while the colours of light co-mingle without any deterioration, or loss of brilliancy, ])igments or paints will not do so, but by admixture tend to destroy one another. This takes place only to a small extent when but two primary colours are combined ; but if any of the third primary enters into the composition of a tint, a decided deterioration, or loss of intensity, occurs. For this reason we employ many pigments, so as to avoid as far as possible the mixing of colours. But there is another reason why the great admixture of colours is undesirable. Colours are chemical agents, and in some cases the various pigments act chemically on one another. Of all colours yellows suffer most by admixture with other colours; but this is accounted for by their delicacy and purity. For this reason I use a greater variety of yellow pigments than of red or blue.f Were it possible to procure three pigments devoid of chemical affinities, and * Some of these colours are not of a permanent character and could not be used in work intended to be lasting. I use them for patterns for our manufactures, where when the drawing is once copied in a fabric it is destroyed. Some of the brightest colours are unfortunately the most fleeting. t Of all mediums in which colours can be mixed, parafRne is the safest; ib is without cheu;icul affinitits, and is therefore well calculated to preserve pif^ments in their original condition. COLOUR SHADES, TINTS, AND HUES. 39 each of the same physical constitution, as of equal degrees of transparency or opacity, one truly representing the blue of light, another the red, and another the yellow, we should need no others, for of these we could form all other colours ; but as no pigments come even near to the fulfilment of these conditions, we have to employ roundabout and clumsy methods of arriving at desired results. There is one statement which I have made that, perhaps, needs a little elucidation, although the careful student may have seen the reason of my asser- tion. I said that purple harmonised with citrine, green with russet, and orange with olive. I might have expressed it (and many would have done so) thus : — The complement of citrine is purple, the complement of russet is green, and the complement of olive is orange. A colour which is complementary to any other is that which, with it, completes the presence of the three primary colours : thus green is the complement of red, and red of green, for each, together with the colour to which it is the complement, completes the presence of the three colours. But in order to a harmony, the complement must be made up in certain proportions. Let us now refer to our second diagrammatic table, and we there see that citrine is formed of two equivalents of yellow and only one equivalent of red and of blue. Now, in order to a harmony, each primary should be present in two equivalents, as one is present in this quantity — i.e., the yellow. One equivalent of blue and one of red (both of which are wanting in the citrine) form purple ; hence purple is the complement of citrine, or the colour that with it produces a harmony. In russet one equivalent of blue and one of yellow are wanting, and these in com- bination are green — green, then, is the complement of russet. And in olive one equivalent of red and one of yellow are wanting — red and yellow form orange, hence orange is the complement of olive. I have spoken of all colours as of full intensity and purity, but we have to deal also with other conditions. All colours may be darkened by black, when shades are produced ; or reduced by white, when iiuls are produced. Besides these alterations in intensity, a portion of one colour may be added to another. Thus, if a small portion of blue be mingled with red, the red becomes a crimson or blue-red ; or if a small portion of yellow be added to the red, the latter becomes a scarlet or yellow- red. In like manner, when yellow is in excess in a green, we have a yellow-green ; or when blue is in excess, a blue-green ; and so with the other colours. Such alterations produce hues of colour. We now come to the subtleties of harmony. Thus, if we have a yellow-red or scarlet — a red with yellow in it — the green that will harmonise with it will be a blue-green ; or if we have a blue-red or crimson — a red with blue in it — the green that will harmonise with it will be a yellow-green. This is obvious, for the following reasons : — Let us suppose a red I'epresented by the equivalent number, five, with one part of blue added to it, thus causing it to be a blue-red or crimson. Were the red 40 PIltNCIPLES OF DESIGN. pure, there should be eleven parts of green as a complement to the five of red, of which green eight parts would be blue and three yellow ; but the blue-red occurs in six parts, one of which is blue — there are, then, but seven parts of blue remaining in the equivalent quantity to combine with the three of yellow, one being already used; hence the green formed is a yellow-green, one of the equivalents of blue necessary to the formation of a true green being already in combination with the red, and thus absent from the green. The same reasoning will apply to the scarlet-red and blue-green, and, indeed, to all similar cases ; but to take the case of the crimson-red and yellow-green, as just given, and carry it a stage further, we might add two parts (out of the eight) of blue to the red, and make it more blue, and then form the complementary green of six parts of blue' and three of yellow, and thus make it more yellow. Or we may go further still, and add to the red six of the eight parts of blue, when the admixture would appear as a red-purple rather than as a blue-red, in which Case the com- plementary green — or, rather, green-yellow — would consist of two parts of blue and three of yellow. These facts are diagrammatically expressed in the following : — Bed. 000007^. , . Yelloiv- ( O O O Yellow. r Urimson harmonises with < Blue. O ) Green- (^OOOOOOO Slue. Or, Bed. 00000 7 S^'^''- , . . , ^'^''2/ C 000 Yellow. ?- harmonises with Yellow -< Blue.. 00) Crimson ^^^^^^ ) O O O O O O Slue. Or, Bed. 000007 Green- C O O O Yellow. r „ , harmonises with „ „ -{ ^, Blue. 000000 ) Pwrple Yellow. I O O Slue. In all these cases it will be seen that we have eight parts of blue, five of red, and three of yellow, only the mode of combination varies. This variation may occur to any extent, provided the totals of each be always the equivalent proportions. These remarks will apply equally to hues of colour, shades, and tints, and to shades and tints of hues. Care, and a little practice, will enable the leai'ner to arrange colours into a number of degrees of depth, or shades, as they are generally called. (We do not here use the term as signifying pure colours darkened with black.) Ten shades of each colour differing obviously in degree of depth can readily be arranged by the experienced, the ten shades being equidistant from each other as regards dej^th — that is, shade 3 will be as mucli darker than shade 2 as shade 2 is darker than shade 1, and so on throughout the whole. Pm-ple is a colour intermediate between blue and red. Imagine ten hues between tbe purple and the red, and ten more between the purple and the blue : thus we should have purple, then a slightly red purple, then a rather redder purple, then a purple still redder, and so on till we get purple-reds, and COLOUR — DIAGRAMS OP HARMONY. 41 finally the pure rod ; and the same variations of hue at the blue side also. Imagine, further, the green having ten hues extending towards the blue, and ten more stretch- ing towards the yellow ; and the orange having ton hues towards the red, and ten towards the yellow — in all cases I count the colour from which we start as one of the ten, thus : — Blue Purple Red 0987654321234567890 — and we shall have 54 colours and hues of colour. Of each of these 54 colours and hues imagine 10 degrees of depth, and we get 540 colours, hues, tints, and shades, all differing from one another to an obvious degree. Mark this fact, that any colour, tint, hue, or shade of such a diagram has its complement in one other of the colours, tints, hues, or shades of the diagram, and that only two of this series of 540 are complementary to each other; thus, if you fix on any one colour of the 540, there is but one colour in the whole that is complementary to it, and it is complementary to but this one other colour. The student will do well to try and make a colour-diagram of this kind, of a simple character, say such as the following, only using pigments for my numbers ; but in doing so he must exercise the utmost care, in order that he secure some degree of accuracy of tint or shade, and if he can call to his aid an experienced colourist it will be of great assistance to him. Jted- <5> <0 CP ■red A5 42 PUTNCIPLES OF DESIGN. This table is hig-hly valuable^ as it gives ninety harmonies, if carefully prepared in colour ; and the preparation of such a table is the very best practice that a student can possibly have. Let us for a moment consider this table, and suppose that we want to find the complement to some particular colour, as the third shade of red. We find the com- plement of this in the third shade of green opposite. If we want the complement of the second shade of orange-yellow, we find it in the second shade of blue-purple opposite, and so on. Thus we have a means of at once judging of the harmony of colours. It must ever be borne in mi ad that pigments mixed in the proportions given will not yield results such as would occur when the coloured rays of light are combined ; thus three parts, either by weight or measure, of chrome yellow when combined with eight parts of ultramarine would not form a colour representing the secondary green, nor would the result be more satisfactory were other pigments combined in the proportions given. What we have said in respect to the proportions in which colours combine to form new colours applies only to the coloured rays of light. It must now be noticed that while colours harmonise in the proportions stated, the areas occupied by the different colours may vary if there be a corresponding alteration in intensity. Thus eight of blue and eight of orange form a perfect harmony when both colours are of prismatic intensity ; but we shall still have a perfect harmony if the orange is diluted to one-half its strength with white, and thus formed into a tint, provided there be sixteen parts of this orange of half strength to the eight parts of blue of full strength. The orange might be further diluted to one-third of its full power, but then twenty-four parts would be necessary to a perfect harmony with eight parts of prismatic blue ; or to one-fourth of its strength, when thirty-two parts would be necessary to the harmony. It is not desirable that I occupy space with diagrams of these quantities, but the industrious student will prepare them for himself, and will strive to realise a true half-tint, quarter-tint, etc., which is not a very easy thing to do. By practice, however, it will readily be accomplished, and anything achieved is a new power gained. What I have said respecting the harmony of blue with tints of orange will apply in all similar cases. Thus red will harmonise with tints of green, provided the area of the tint be increased as the intensity is decreased; and so will yellow harmonise with tints of piirple under similar conditions. But we may reverse the conditions, and lower the primary to a tint retaining the secondary in its intensity. Thus blue, if reduced to a half -tint, will harmonise with orange of prismatic intensity in the proportion of sixteen of blue to eight of COLOUR HARMONY OF SHADES AND TINTS. 43 orange ; or, if reduced to a quarter-tint, in the proportion of tliirty-two of blue to eight of orange. Red, if reduced to a half-tint, will harmonise in the proportion of ten red to eleven of green ; and yellow as a half-tint in the proportion of six yellow to thirteen of purple. The same remarks might be made respecting the harmony of shades of colour with colours of prismatic intensity. Thus, if orange is diluted to a shade of half intensity with black, it will harmonise with pure blue in the proportion of sixteen of orange to eight of blue, and so on, just as in the case of tints ; and this principle applies to the harmony of all hues of colour also. To go one step further : we scarcely ever deal with pure colours or their shades or tints, or even come as near them as we can. With great intensity of colour we seem to require an ethereal character, such as we have in those of light; but our pigments are coarse and earthy — they are too real-looking, and are not ethereal — they may be said to be corporeal rather than spiritual in character. For this reason we have to avoid the use of our purest pigments in such quantities as render their poverty of nature manifest, and to use for large surfaces such tints as, through their subtlety of composition, interest and please. A tint the composition of which is not apparent is always preferable to one of more obvious formation. Thus we are led to use tints which are subtly formed, and such as please by their newness and bewilder by the intricacy of formation. To do what I here mean it is not necessary that many pigments be mixed together in order to the formation of a tint. The effect of which I speak can frequently be got by two well-chosen pigments. Thus a fine series of low-toned shades can be produced by mixing together middle-chrome and brown-lake in various proportions, and in all of the shades thus formed the three primary colours will Ije represented, but in some yellow will predominate, and in othei's red ; while in many it will not be easy to discover to what proportionate extent the three primary colours are present. Let us suppose that we make a tint by adding white to cobalt blue. This blue contains a small amount of yellow, and is a slightly green blue. But to this tint we add a small amount of raw umber with the view of imparting a greyness* or atmospheric character. Raw umber is a neutral colour, leaning slightly to yellow — that is, it consists of red, blue, and yellow, with a slight excess of the latter. In order that an orange harmonise with this grey-blue of a slightly yellow tone, the orange must be slightly inclined to red, so as to form the complement of the little green formed by the yellow in the blue. It may harmonise with the grey-blue as a pure tint if the area of the diluted and neutralised primary is * Cobalt, raw umber, and white make a magnificent grey, both in oil-colours, in tempera (powder- colours mixed with gum-water), and in distemper (powdei'-colours mixed with size). 44 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. sufficiently extended, or may itself be likewise reduced to a tint of tlie same depth, when both tints would have the same area. I might g-o on multiplying cases of this character to almost any extent, but these I leave the student to work out for himself, and pass to notice that while it is desirable to use subtle tints (often called "broken tints it is rarely expedient to make up the full harmony by a large area of a tertiary tone and a single positive colour. Thus, we might have a shade or a tint of citrine sjireading over a large surface as a ground on which we wished to place a figure. This figure would harmonise in pure purple were it of a certain size, and yet if thus coloured it would give a somewhat common-place effect when finished, for the harmony would be too simple and obvious. It would be much better to have the nineteen parts of citrine reduced, say, to half intensity, when the area would be increased to thirty-eight, with the figm-e of eight parts of blue and five of red, than of thirteen parts of purple. But it would be better still if there were the thirty-eight parts of reduced citrine, three parts of pure yellow, thirteen of purple, five of red, and eight of blue, together with white, black, or gold, or all three (these may be added without altering the conditions, as all act as neutrals), for here the harmony is of a more subtle character. If we count up the equivalents of the colours emjiloyed in this scheme of harmony, we shall see that we have, in the citrine — Yellow . . . . . .6 (two equivalents). Blue . . . . . .8 (one equivalent). Red . . . . . .5 (one equivalent). In the purple — Blue . . . . . .8 (one equivalent). Red . . . . . .6 (one equivalent). Of the nure colours — Yellow • . . . . .3 (one equivalent). Red . . . . . .5 (one equivalent). Blue . . . . . .8 (one equivalent). Thus we have three equivalents of each primary, which give a perfect harmony. I must not say more respecting the laws of harmony, for in the space of a small work it is impossible to do so, but proceed to notice certain effects or properties of colours, which I have as yet only alluded to, or have passed altogether unnoticed. I have said that black, white, and gold are neutral as regards colour. This is the case, although many would suppose that gold was a yellow. Gold will act as a yellow, but it is generally employed as a neutral in decorative work, and COLOUR — TEACHINGS OF EXPERIENCE. 45 it is more of a neutral than a yellow, for both red and blue exist largely in it. The pictorial artist frames his picture with gold because it, being a neutral, does not interfere with the tints of his work. It has the further advantage of being rich and costly in appearance, and thus of giving an impression of worth where it exists. Black, white, and gold, being neutral, may be advantageously employed to separate colours where separation is necessary or desirable. Yellow and purple harmonise, but yellow is a light colour and purple is dark. These colours not only harmonise, but also contrast as to depth, the one being light and the other dark. The limit of each colour, wherever these are used in juxtaposition, is therefore obvious. It is not so with red and green, for these harmonise when of the same depth. This being the case, and red being a glowing colour, if a red object is placed on a green ground, or a green object on a red ground, the " figure and ground will appear to " swim" together, and will produce a dazzling efEect. Colour must assist form, and not confuse it. It will do this in the instance just named if the figure is outlined with black, white, or gold, and there will be no loss of harmony. But experience has shown that this effect can also be averted by outlining the figure with a lighter tint of its own colour. Thus, if the figure is red and the ground green, an outline of lighter red (pink) may be employed. (See Proposition 26, page 34.) A blue figure on a red ground (as ultramarine on carmine), or a red figure on a blue ground, will also produce this swimming and unsatisfactory effect, but this is again obviated by an outline of black, white, or gold. Employing the outline thus must not be regarded as a means of merely ren- dering what was actually unpleasant endurable, for it does much more — it affords one of the richest means of effect. A carmine ground well covered with bold green ornament having a gold outline is, if well managed, truly gorgeous ; and were the figure blue on the red ground, the lavish use of gold would render the employ- ment of yellow unnecessary' as the yellow formed in the eye and cast upon the gold would satisfy all requirements. It is a curious fact that the eye will create any colour of which there is a de- ficiency. This it will do, but the colour so created is of little use to the composition unless white or gold is present; if, however, there be white or gold in the com- position, the colour which is absent, or is insufficiently represented, will be formed in the eye and cast upon these neutrals, and the white or the gold, as the case may be, will assume the tint of the deficient or absent colour. (See Propositions 8 and 9, page 32.) While this occurs (and sometimes it occurs to a marked degree, as can be shown by experiment), it must not be supposed that a composition in which any element is 46 PRINCIPLKS OF DESIGN. wanting is as perfect as one which reveals no want. It is far otherwise; only Nature here comes to our assistance, and is content to help herself rather than endure our short-comings ; but in the one case we give Nature the labour of completing the harmony; while in the other, all being prepared, we receive a sense of satisfaction and repose. In Proposition 8 we showed that when blue and black are juxtaposed, the black becomes " rusty,'"' or assumes an orange tint; and in Proposition 9 we gave the cause of this effect. Let a blue spot be placed on a black silk necktie, and however black the silk, it will yet appear rusty. This is a fact; but we sometimes desire to employ blue on black, and wish the black to look black, and not an orange-black. How can we do this ? Obviously by substituting for the black a very dark blue, as indigo. The bright blue spot induces orange (the complement of blue) in the eye. This orange, when cast upon black, causes the latter to look " rusty ; " but if we place in the black an amount of blue sufficient to neutralise the orange cast upon it, the effect will be that of a jet-black. We have now considered those qualities of colour, and those laws of contrast and harmony, which may be said to be of the grosser sort ; but we have scarcely touched on those considerations which pertain to special refinement or tenderness of effect. But let me close the part of my subject of which I have treated, by repeating a statement already made — a statement, let me say, which first led me to perceive really harmony of colour — that those colours, and those particular hues of colour, which improve each other to the utmost, are those which perfectly harmonise. (Consider this statement in connection with Propositions 8, 9, 10, and 14, pages 32 and 33.) We come now to consider delicacies and refinements in colour effects, which, although dependent upon the skilful exercise of the laws enunciated, are yet of a character, the power to produce which only results from the consideration of the works of the masters of great art-nations ; but of these effects I can say little beyond pointing out what should be studied. This principle however I cannot pass without notice — namely, that the fijiest colour effects are those of a rich, mingled, bloomy character. Imagine a luxuriant garden, the beds in which are filled with a thousand flowers, having all the colours of the rainbow, and imagine these arranged as closely together as will permit of their growth. When viewed from a distance the effect is soft and rich, and full and varied, and is all that is pleasant. This is Nature's colouring. It is our work humbly to strive at producing like beauty with her. This leads me to notice that primary colours (and secondary colours, also, when of great intensity) should be used chiefly in small masses^ together with gold, white, or black. COLOUR — REFINEMENTS OF HARMONY. 47 Visit the Indian Museum at Whitehall^* and consider the beautiful Indian shawls and scarves and table-covers ; or, if unable to do so, look in the windows of our large drapers in the chief towns, and see the true Indian fabrics,t and observe the manner in which small portions of intense reds, blues, yellows, greens, and a score of tertiary tints, are combined with white and black and gold to produce a very miracle of bloom. I know of nothing in the way of colour combination so rich, so beautiful, so gorgeous, and yet so soft, as some of these Indian shawls. It is curious that we never find a purely Indian work otherwise than in good taste as regards colour harmony. Indian works, in this respect — whether carpets, or shawls, or dress materials, or lacquered boxes, or enamelled weapons — are almost perfect — perfect in harmony, perfect in richness, perfect in the softness of their general effect. How strangely these works contrast with ours, where an harmonious work in colours is scarcely ever seen. By the co-mingling (not co-mixing) of colours in the manner just described, a rich and bloomy effect can be got, having the general tone of a tertiary colour of any desired hue. Thus, if a wall be covered with little ornamental fiowerets, by colouring all alike, and letting each contain two parts of yellow and one part of blue and one of red, as separate and pure colours, the distant hue will be that of citrine : the same effect will result if the flowers are coloured variously, while the same proportions of the primaries are preserved throughout. I can conceive of no decorative effects more subtle, rich, and lovely than those of which I now speak. Imagine three rooms, all connected by open archways, and all decorated with a thousand flower-like ornaments, and these so coloured, in this mingled manner, that in one room blue predominates, in another red, and in another yellow; we should then have a beautiful tertiary bloom in each — a subtle mingling of colour, an ex- quisite delicacy and refinement of treatment, a fulness such as always results from a rich mingling of hues, and an amount of detail which would interest when closely inspected ; besides which, we should have the harmony of the general effect of the three rooms, the one appearing as olive, another as citrine, and the other as russet. This mode of decoration has this advantage, that it not only gives richness and beauty, but it also gives purity. If pigments are mixed together they are thereby reduced in intensity, as we have already seen ; but if placed side by side, when viewed from a distance the eye will mix them, but they will suffer no diminution of brilliancy. With the view of cultivating the eye, Eastern works cannot be too carefully studied. The Indian Museum should be the home of all who can avail themselves of tlie opportunity of study which it affords ; and the small Indian department of the * This museum is open free to tbe public. f These will only be seen in very first-class shops. 48 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. South Kensington Museum should not be neglceted, small though it is* Chinese works must also be considered, for they likewise supply most valuable examples of colour harmony ; and although they do not present such a perfect colour bloom as do the works of India, yet they are never inharmonious, and give clearness and sharp- ness, together with great brilliancy, in a manner not attempted by the Indians. The best works of Chinese embroidery are rarely seen in this country; but these are unsurpassed by the productions of any other people. For richness, splendour, and purity of colour, together with a delicious coolness, I know of nothing to equal them. The works of the Jajianese are not to be overlooked, for in certain branches of art they are inimitable, and as colourists they are almost perfect. On the commonest of their lacquer trays we generally have a bit of good colouring, and their coloured pictures ai-e sometimes marvels of harmony. As to the styles of colouring adopted by the nations referred to, I should say that the Indians produce rich, mingled, bloomy, warm effects — that is, effects in which red and yellow prevail ; that the Chinese achieve clearness, repose, and coolness — a form of colouring in which blue and white prevail; and that the Japanese effects are warm, simple, and quiet. Besides studying the works of India, China, and Japan, study those also of Turkey and Morocco, and even those of Algeria, for here the colouring is much better than with us, although not so good as in the countries first named. No aid to progress must be neglected, and no help must be despised. f With the view of refining the judgment fui-ther in respect to colour, get a good colour-top,J and study its beautiful effects. See also the ''gas tubes" illuminated * It. may not be generally known, bnt nearly all our large mannfactnring towns liave, in connection with the Chamber of Commerce, a collection of Indian fabrics, filling several large volumes, which were prepared, at the expense of Government, under the superintendence of Dr. Forbes Watson, and which -were given to the various towns on the condition that they be accessible to all persons who are trustworthy. Although these collections do not embrace the costly decorated fabrics, yet much can be learned from them, and the combinations of colour are always harmonious. A much larger collection is now in course of formation. f The South Kensington Museum has a very interesting collection of art-works from China and Japan ; but the latter are chiefly lent. It is a strange thing that the perfect works of the East are so poorly illustrated in this national collection, while costly, yea, very costly works of inferior character, illustrative of Eenaissance art, swarm as thickly as flies in August. This can only be accounted for by the fact that the heads of the institution have a feeling for pictorial rather thaa decorative art, and the Renaissance ornament is that which has most of the pictorial element. To me, the style appears to owe its very weakness to this fact, for decorative ai-t shou d be wholly ideal. Pictorial art is of necessity more or less imitative. X Not the so-called colour or "chameleon" top sold in the t' y-shops, but the more scientific toy procurable of opticians, together with the perforated discs of Mr. John Graham, M.E.C.S., of Tunbridge, Kent. COLOURING — EASTERN METHODS. 49 by electricity, as sold by opticians, and let tlie prism yield you daily instruction. Soap-bubbles may also be blown, and the beautiful colours seen in tliem carefully noted. These and any other available means of cultivating- the eye should constantly be resorted to, as by such means only can we become great colourists. As to works on colour, we have the writings of Field, to whom we are indebted for valuable discoveries; of Hay, the decorator, and friend of the late David Roberts, but some of his ideas are wild and Utopian ; of Chevreul, whose work will be most useful to the student ; and the small catechism of colour by Mr. Redgrave, of the South Kensington Museum, which is excellent. The student will also do well to carefully study the excellent manual of "Colour'"' by Professor Church, of Cirencester College. H CHAPTER III. FURNITURE. Having considered those principles which are of primary importance to the orna- mentistj we may commence our notice of the various manufactures, and try to discover what particular form of art should be applied to each, and the special manner in which decorative principles should be considered as applicable to various materials and modes of working. We shall first consider furniture, or cabinet-work, because articles of furniture occupy a place of greater importance in a room than carpets, wall-papers, or, perhaps, any other decorative works ; and, also, because we shall learn from a consideration of furniture those structural principles which will ])e of value to us in considering the manner in which all art-objects should be formed if they have solid, and not simply superficial, dimensions. In the present chapter, I shall strive to impress the fact that design and ornamentation may be essentially different things, and that in considering the formation of works of furniture these should be regarded as sejDarate and distinct. " Design," says Redgrave, " has reference to the construction of any work both for use and beauty, and therefore includes its ornamentation also. Ornament is merely the decoration of a thing constructed." The construction of furniture will form the chief theme of this chapter, for unless such works are properly constructed they cannot possibly be useful, and if not useful they would fail to answer the end for which they were contrived. But before commencing a consideration of the principles involved in the construction of works of furniture, let me summarise what is required in such works if they are to assume the character of art-objects. 1. The general form, or mass form, of all constructed works must be carefully considered. The aspect of the " sky-blotch " of an architectural edifice is very important, for as the day wanes the detail fades and parts become blended, till the members compose but one whole, which, when seen from the east, appears as a solid mass drawn in darkness on the glowing sky ; this is the sky-blotch. If the edifice eit masse is pleasing, a great point is gained. Indeed, the general contour should have primary consideration. In like manner, the general form of all works of furniture should first bo cared for, and every effort should be made at securing to the general mass beauty of shape. FURNITURE — GENERAL PRINCIPLES. 51 2. After having cared for the general furm, the manner in which the work shall be divided into primary and secondary parts must be considered with reference to the laws of proportion, as stated in a former chapter. 3. Detail and enrichment may now be considered; but while these cannot be too excellent, they must still be subordinate in obtrusiveness to the general mass, or to the aspect of the work as a whole. 4. The material of which the object is formed must always be worked in the most natural and appropriate manner. 5. The most convenient or appropriate form for an object should always be chosen, for unless this has been done, no reasonable hope can be entertained that the work will be satisfactory; for the consideration of utility must in all cases precede the consideration of beauty, as we saw in our first chapter. Having made these few general remarks, we must consider the structvire of works of furniture. The material of which we form our furniture is wood. Wood has a " grain,'' and the strength of any particular piece largely depends upon the direction of its grain. It may be strong if its grain runs parallel with its length, or weak if the grain crosses diagonally, or very weak if the grain crosses transversely. However strong the wood, it l^ecomes comparatively much weaker if the grain crosses the piece ; and however weak the wood, it becomes yet weaker if the grain is transverse or diagonal. These considerations lead us to see that the grain of the wood must always be parallel vj'iJh its length whenever strength is required. For our guidance in the formation of works of furniture, I give the following short table of woods arranged as to their strength : — Iron-tvood, from Jamaica — very strong, bearing great lateral pressure. Box of Illawarry, New South Wales — very strong, but not so strong as iron-wood. Mountain ash, New South Wales — about two-thirds the strength of iron-wood. Beech — nearly as strong as mountain ash. Mahogany, from New South Wales — not quite so strong as last. Blade dog-wood of Jamaica — three-fourths as strong as the mahogany jtist named. Box-wood, Jamaica — not half as strong as the box of New South Wales. Cedar of Jamaica — half as strong as the mahogany of New South Wales.* Wood can be got of sufllcient length to meet all the requirements of furniture- making, yet we not unfrequently find the arch structurally introduced into furniture, while it is absurd to employ it in wooden construction of any kind. The arch is a most ingenious invention, as it affords a means of spanning a large space with small portions of material, as with small stones, and at the same time gives great * For full parlicul irs on this subject see ' Catalogue of the Collection illustrating Construction and Building Matoiial," in the South Kensington Museum, and the manual of " Techuiciil Drawing for Cabinetmakers," by E. A. Davidson. b-2 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. streng'th. It is, therefore, of the utmost utility in constructing stone buildings; but in works of furniture, where we have no large spaces to span, and where wood is of the utmost length required, and is stronger than our requirements demand, the use of the arch becomes structurally foolish and absurd. The folly of this mode of struc- ture becomes more apparent when we notice that a wooden arch is always formed of one or two pieces, and not of very small portions, and when we further consider that, in order to the formation of an arch, the wood must be cut across its grain throughout the greater portion of its length, whereby its strength is materially decreased ; while if the arch were formed of small pieces of stone great strength would be secured. Nothing can be more absurd than the practice of imitating in one material a mode of construction which is only legitimate in the case of another, and of failing to avail ourselves of the particular mode of utilising a material which secures a maximum of desirable results. While I protest against the arch when structurally used in furniture, I see no objection to it if used only as a source of beauty, and when so situated as to be free from strain or pressure. One of the objects which we are frequently called upon to construct is a chair. The chair is, throughout Europe and America, considered as a necessity of every house. So largely used are chairs, that one firm at High Wycombe employs 5,000 hands in making common cane-bottomed chairs alone; and yet we see but few chairs in the market which are well constructed. All chairs having curved frames — whether the curve is in the wood of the back, in the sides of the seat, or in the legs — are constructed on false principles. They are of necessity weak, and being weak are not useful. As they are formed by using wood in a manner which fails to utilise its qualities of strength, these chairs are offensive and absurd. It is true that, through being surrounded by such ill-formed objects from our earliest infancy, the eye often fails to be offended with such works as would offend it were they new to it; but this does not show that they are the less offensive, nor that they are not constructively wrong. Besides, whenever wood is cut across the grain, in order that we get any- thing approaching the requisite strength, it has to be much thicker and more bulky than would be required were the wood cut with the grain ; hence such f urnitm-e is unnecessarily heavy and clumsy. Fig. 26 represents a chair which I have taken the liberty of borrowing from Mr. Eastlake's work on household art.* This chair Mr. Eastlake gives as an illustration of good taste in the construction of furniture ; but I give it as an illustration of that which is essentially bad and wrong. The legs are weak, being cross-grained * The title of tine work is " Hints on Household Taste." It is well worth reading, as much may be learned from it. I think Mr. Ea?tlake right in many views, yet wrong in others, but I cannot help regarding him somewhat as an apostle of ugliness, as he appears to me to despise finish and refinement. FUllNITUKE — CHAIRS. throughout, and the mode of uniting- the upper and lower portions o£ the two semicii'cles) by a circular boss is defective in the highest degree. Were I sitting in such a chair, I should be afraid to lean to the right or the left, for fear of the chair giving way. Give me a Yorkshire rocking-chair, in pre- ference to one of these, where I know of my insecurity, much as I hate such. A chair is a stool with a back-rest, and a stool is a board elevated from the ground or floor by suj^ports, the degree of eleva- tion being determined by the length of the legs of the person for whom the seat is made, or by the degree of obliquity which the body and legs are desired to take when the seat is in use. If the seat is to su2ii)ort the body when in an erect sitting posture, about seventeen to eighteeu inches will be found a convenient height for the average of persons ; but if the legs of the sitter are to take an oblique forward direction, then tlie seat may be lower. A stool may consist of a thick piece of wood and of three logs inserted into holes bored in this thick top. If these legs pass to the upper surface of the seat, and are properly wedged in, a usefid yet clumsy seat results. In order that the top of the stool be thin and light, it will be necessary that the legs be connected by frames, and it will be well that they be Fio-. 27. legs Fig. 2t>. 54. PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. connected twice, once at the top of each leg-, so that the seat may rest upon this frame, and once at least two-thirds of the distance from the top. The frame would now stand alone, and although the seat is formed of thin wood it will not crack, as it is supported all round on the upper frame. A chair, I have said, is a stool with a back. There is not one chair out of fifty that we find with the back so attached to the seat as to g-ive a maximum of strength. It is usual to make a back leg and one side of the chair-back out of one piece of wood — that is, to continue the l)ack legs up above the seat, and cause them to become the sides of the chair-back. When this is done the wood is almost invariably curved so that the back legs and the chair-back both incline outwards from the seat. There is no objection what- ever to the sides of the back and the legs being formed of the one piece, but there is a great objection to either the supports of the back or the legs being formed of cross-grained wood, as much of their strength is thereby sacrificed. Our illustrations (Figs. 27 to 32) will give several modes of construct- ing- chairs such as I think legitimate ; but I will ask the reader to think for himself ujion the construction of a chair, and especially upon the proper means of giving" due support to the back. I have given, in an axiomatic form, those principles which should guide us in the construction of works of furniture, and endeavoured to impress the necessity of using wood in that manner which is most natural — that is, "working" it with the grain (the manner in which we can most easily work it), and in that way which shall secure the greatest amount of strength with the least expenditure of material. I wish to impress my readers with the importance of these considerations, for they lie at the very root of the successful construction of furniture. If the legs of chairs, or their seat-frames, or the ends or backs of couches, are formed of wood cut across the grain, they must either be thick and clumsy, or weak ; but, besides this, the rightly constituted mind can only receive pleasure from the contemplation of works which are wisely formed. Daily contact, as we have before said, with ill-shaped Fig. 28. FURNITURE — CHAIRS. 55 objects may have more or less deadened our senses, so that we are not so reiidiJy offended by deformity and error as we might be ; yet, happily for us, directly we seek to separate truth from error, the beautiful from the deformed, reason assists the judgment, and we learn to feel when we are in the presence of the beautiful or in contact with the degraded. My illustrations will show how I think chair^ should be constructed. Fig. 26 is essentially bad, although it has traditional sanction, hence I pass it over without further comment. Fig. 27 is in the manner of an Egyptian chair. It serves to show the careful way in which the Egyptians constructed their works. The curved Fia. 29. Fig. 30. rails against which the back w^ould rest are the only parts which are not thoroughly correct and satisfactory in a wood structure. Were the curved back members metal, the curvature would be desirable and legitimate. The back of this chair, if the side members were connected by a straight rail, would have immense strength (the backs of some of our chairs are of the very weakest), and if well made it is a seat which would endure for centuries. Fig. 28 is a chair of my own designing, in which I have sought to give strength to the back by connecting its upper portion with a strong cross-rail of the frame. Fig. 29 is a chair slightly altered from one in l^lv. Eastlake's work on " Household Taste ; " as shown in our illustration, it is a correctly formed work. Fig. 30 is an arm-chair in the Greek style, which I have designed. Fig. 31 is a lady's chair in the Gothic style ; Fig. 32, a lady's chair in early Greek. These I have prepared to show different modes of structure ; if the legs are fitted to a frame 56 PKINCIPLES 01'' DESIGN. (the seat-frame), as in the early Greek chair just alluded to, they should be very short, as in this instance, or they must be connected by a frame below the seat, as in Figs. 33 and 34;. The best general structure is that in which the front legs pass to the level of the upper surface of the seat. Fig. 33 is a copy of a chair shown by Messrs. Gillow and Co., of Oxford Street, in the last Paris International Exhibition. In maiiy respects it is admirably constructed. The skeleton brackets holding the back to the seat are very desirable Fig. 31. Fig. 32. adjuncts to light chairs; so are the brackets connecting the legs with the seat-frame, as these strengthen the entire chair. The manner in which the upper rail of the back passes through the side uprights and is " pinned " is good. The chief, and only important, fault in this chair is the bending of the back legs, involving their being cut against the grain of the wood. Fig. 31. is a chair from Mr. Talbert's very excellent work on " Gothic Fur- niture." It shows an admirable method of supporting the back. Fig. 35 I have designed as a high-backed lounging chair. With the view of giving strength to the back, I have extended the seat, and arranged a support from this extension to the upper back-rail, and this extension of the seat I have supported by a fifth leg. yUENITURE — COUCHES. 57 There is no reason whatever why a chair should have four legs. If three would be better, or five, or any other number, let us use what would be best.* I have now given several illustrations of modes of forming chairs. I might have given many more, but it is not my duty to try and exhaust a subject. What 1 have to do is simply point out principles, and call attention to facts. It is the reader who must thinlv for himself — first, of the principles and facts which I adduce j secondly, of the illustrations which I give ; thirdly, of other works which he may Fig. 33. meet with ; and fourthly, of further means of producing desirable and satisfactory results than those set forth in my illustrations. As it cannot be doubted that a well-constructed work, however plain or simj^le it may be, gives satisfaction to those who behold it — while a work of the most elaborate character fails to satisfy if badly constructed — we shall give a few further illustrations of structure for other articles of furniture, besides chairs, which have become necessary to our mode of life. Fig. .3G is one of my sketches for Greek furniture, designed for a wealthy client. It was formed of black wood. Here the frame of the seat is first formed, * In my drawing, the stuffing of the back has been accidentally shown too much rounded. I 58 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. and the legs are inserted beneath it, and let into it, while the wood-worlc of the end of the couch stands upon it, being- inserted into it. This appears to have been the general method with' the Greeks of forming their furniture, yet it is not so correct structurally as P'ig. 37, another of my sketches, where the end and the leg are formed of one piece of wood. The first formation (that of Fig. 3G) would bear any amoimt of pressure from above, but it is not well calculated for resisting lateral pressure; while the latter would resist this lateral pressure, but would not bear quite the same amount of pressure from above. The latter, however, could bear more weight than would ever l)e required of it, and would be the more durable piece of furniture. Fig. 38 gives a legitimate formation for a settee; the cutting-out, or hollowing, of the sides of the legs is not carried to an extreme, but leaves a sufficiency of strong wood with an upright grain to resist all the pressure that would be placed on the seat, and the lower and upjier thickened portions of the legs act as the brackets beneath the seat in Fig. 33. The arch here introduced is not used structurallv, but for the sake of a curved line, and acts simply as a pair of brackets. This illus- tration is also from Mr. Talbert's work. Fig. 39 is a table such as we occasionally Fig- 35. meet with. I see no objection to the legs leaning inwards at the top; indeed, we have here a picturesque and useful table of legitimate formation. Fig. 40 is the end elevation of a sideboard from Mr. Talbert's work. Mark the simplicity of the structure. The leading or structural lines are straight and obvious. Although Mr. Talbert is not always right, yet his book is well worthj^ of the most careful consideration and study ; and this I can truly say, that it compares favourably with all other works on furniture with which I am acquainted. The general want which we perceive in modern furniture is simplicity of structure and truthfulness of construction. If persons would but think out the easiest mode of constructing a work before they commence to design it, and would be content with this simplicity of structure, we should have very different furniture from what we have. Think first of what is wanted, then of the material at command. Fl'RNITrRE TRI THFl'L CONSTRUCTION. 59 I fear that I have very feebly enforced and very inefficiently illustrated the true princii)les on which works of furniture should be constructed ; and yet I feel that the structure of such works is of importance beyond all other considerations. Fisr. 36. Space is limited, however, and I must pass on ; hence T only hope that I have induced the reader to think for himself, and if 1 have done so I shall have fulldlcd my desire, for his progress will then be sure. Respecting' structure 1 have but a few general remarks further to make, and Fig. 37. all these are fairly embraced in the one expression, "Be truthful." An obvious and true structure is always pleasant. Let, then, the "tenon" and the "mortise" pass through the various members, and let the parts be "pinned" together by obvious wooden pins. Thus, if the frame of a chair-seat is tenoned into the legs, let the tenon pass through the leg and be visible on the outer side, and let it be held in its place by glue and wooden pins — the pins being visible. Yet they need not protrude beyond the surface ; but why hide them ? In this way that old furniture 60 PETXCTPT.KS OF DESIGN'. Fig. 38. was made which has endured while piece aftei- piece of modern furniture, made with invisible joints and concealed nails and screws, has perished. This is a true structural treatment, and is honest in expression also. I do not give this as a principle applicable to one class of furniture only, but to all. When we have "pinned''^ furniture with an open structure (see the back of chair, Fig. 33), the mode of piitting- together must of necessity be manifest ; Init in all other cases the tenons should also go through, and the pins by which they are held in their place be driven from one surface to the other side right through the member. In the commencement of this chaj^ter on furniture, I said that after the most convenient form has been chosen for an object, and after it has been arranged that the material of which it is to be formed shall be worked in the most natural or befitting way, that then the block-form must be looked to, after which comes the divi- sion of the mass into primary parts, and lastly, the considera- tion of detail. As to the block- form, let it be simj^le, and have the aj^pear- ance of appropriateness and consistency. Its character must be re- gulated, to an extent, by the nature of the house for which the furniture is intended, and by the character o£ the room in which it is to be placed. All I can say to the student on this part of the subject is this : Carefully consider good works of furniture whenever oppor- tunity occurs, and note their general conformation. A fine work will never have strong architectural qualities — that is, it will not look like pai-t of a building formed Fig. 39. rURNITUllE PROPORTION AND ENRICHMENT. 61 o£ wood instead of stone. There is but small danger of committing' any great error in the block-form, if it be kept simple, and to look like a work in wood, provided that the proportions of height to width and of width and height to thickness are duly cared for (see page 23) . After the general form has been considered, the mass may be broken into primary and secondary parts. Thus, if we have to construct a cabinet, the upper part of which consists of a cupboard, and the lower portion of drawers, we should have to determine the proportion which the one part should bear to the other. This is an in- variable rule — that the work must not consist of equal jiarts ; thus, if the whole cabinet be six feet in height, the cupboards could not be three feet while the drawers occupied three feet also. The division would have to be of a subtle character— of a character which could not be readily detected. Thus the cup- board might be three feet five inches, and the drawers collectively two feet seven inches. If the drawers are not all to be of the same ^epth, then the relation of one drawer, as regards its size, to that of another must be considered, and of each to the cupboard above. In like manner the proportion of the panels of the doors to the styles nuist be tliought out ; and until all this has been done no work should ever be constructed. Next comes the enrichment of parts. Carving sh6uld be sparingly used, and is best confined to mouldings, or projecting or terminal ends. If employed in mouldings, those membei's should be enriched which are more or less comjiletely guarded from dust and injury by some overhanging member. If more carving is used, it should certainly be a mere enrichment of necessary structure — as we see on the legs and other uprights of Mr. Grace's sideboard, by Pugin (Fig. 41). I am not fond of caiwed panels, but should these be employed the caiwing- should never project beyond the styles surrounding them, and in all cases of carving no pointed members must protrude so as to injure the person or destroy the dress of those who use the piece of furniture. If carving is used sparingly, it gives us the impression FX'RNITUUE — MODES OF ENKICHING. 63 that it is valuable ; if it is lavishly employed, it appears to be comparatively worth- less. The aim of art is the production of repose. A large work of furniture which is carved all over cannot produce the necessary sense of repose, and is therefore objectionable. There may be an excess of finish in works of carving connected with cabinet- work ; for if the finish is too delicate there is a lack of effect in the result. A piece of furniture is not a miniature work, which is to be investigated in every detail. It is an object of utility, wliieh is to appear beautiful in a room, and is not to command undivided attention ; it is a work which is to combine with other works in rendering an apartment beautiful. The Soiith Kensington Museum purchased in the last Paris International Exhibition, at great cost, a cabinet from Fonrdonois ; but it is a very unsatisfactory specimen, as it is too delicate, too tender, and too fine for a work of utility — it is an example of what should be avoided rather than of what should be followed. The delicately carved and beautiful panels of the doors, if cut in marble and used as mere pieces of sculpture, would have been worthy of the highest commendation ; but works of this kind wrought in a material that has a ''gi-ain,^'' however little the grain may show, are absurd. Besides, the subjects are of too pictorial a character for " applied work" — that is, they are treated in too pictorial or naturalistic a manner. A broad, simple, idealised treatment of the figure is that which is alone legitimate in cabinet work. Supports or columns carved into the form of human figures are always objectionable. Besides carving, as a means of enrichment, we have inlaying, painting, and the applying of plaques of stone or earthenware, and of brass or ormolu enrich- ments, and we have the inserting of brass into the material when buhl-work is formed. Inlaying is a very natural and beautiful means of enriching works of furniture, for it leaves the flatness of the surface undisturbed. A great deal may be done in this way by the emj)loyment of simple means. A mere row of circular dots of black wood inlaid in oak will often give a remarkably good effect ; and the dots can be " worked with the utmost ease. Three dots form a trefoil, four dots a quatrefoil, six dots a hexafoil, and so on, and desirable effects can often be produced by such simple inlays. Panels of cabinets may be painted, and enriched with ornament or flatly- treated figure subjects. This is a beautiful mode of decoration very much neglected. The couch (Fig. 37) I intended for enrichment of this kind. If this form is employed, care should be exercised in order that the painted work be in all cases so situated that it cannot be rubbed. It should fill sunk panels and hollows and never appear on advancing members. I am not fond of the application of plaques of stone or earthenware to works 64 PKINCIPLES OF DESIGN. of furniture. Anything that is brittle is not suitable as an enrichment of wood- workj unless it can be so placed as to be out of danger. Ormolu ornaments^ when applied to cabinets and other works in wood^ are also never satisfactory. They look too separate from the wood of which the work is formed — too obviously applied ; and whatever is obviously applied to the work^ and is not a portion of its general fabric, whether a mass of flowers even if carved in wood or an ormolu ornament, is not pleasant. Buhl-work is often very clever in character and skilfully wrought, but I do not care for it. It is of too laborious a nature, and thus intrudes upon us the sense of labour as well as that of skill. As a means of enrichment, I approve of carving-, sparingly used, of inlays, and of painted ornament in certain eases ; and by the just employment of these means the utmost beauty in cabinet-work can be achieved. Ebony inlaid with ivory is very beautiful. In order to illustrate my remarks respecting cabinets, side- boards, and similar pieces of furniture, I give an engraving of a sideboard executed by ]Mr. Grace, from the design of Mr. A. Welby Pugin (the father), to which I have before alluded (Fig. 41), and a painted cabinet by Mr. Burgess (Fig. 42), the well-known Gothic architect, whose architecture must be admired. Both of these works are worthy of study of a very careful kind. In the sideboard, notice first the general structure or construction of the work, then the manner in which it is broken into parts, and lastly, that it is the structural members which are carved. If this work has faults, they are these : first, the carving is in excess — thus, the panels would have been better plain ; and, second, in some parts there is a slight indication of a stone structure, as in the buttress character of the ends of the sideboard. THE FALSE IN FURNITURE. 65 To the cabinet much more serious objections may be taken. 1st. A roof is a means whereby the weather is kept out o£ a dwelling", and tiles afford a means whereby small pieces of material enable us to form a perfect covering to our houses of a weather-proof character. It is very absurd, then, to treat the roof of a cabinet, which is to stand in a room, as if it were an entii-e house, or an object which were to stand in a garden. "2nd. The windows in the roof, which in the case of a house let light into those rooms which are placed in this part of the building, and are formed in a particular manner so as the more perfectly to exclude rain, become simply stupid when placed in the roof of a cabinet. These, together with the imitation tiled roof, degrade the work to a mere doll's house in appearance. 3rd. A panelled structure, which is the strongest and best structure, is ignored; hence strong metal bindings are necessary. The painting of the work is highly interesting, and had it been more flatly treated, would then have been truthful, and would yet have lent the same interest to the cabinet that it now does, even if we consider the matter from a purely pictorial point of view. Before we pass from a consideration of furniture and cabinet-work generally, we must notice a few points to which we have as yet merely referred, or which we have left altogether unnoticed. Thus we have to consider upholstery as applied to works of furniture, the materials employed as coverings for seats, and the nature of picture-frames and curtain-poles ; we must also notice general errors in furniture, strictly so called. When examining certain wardrobes and cabinets in the International Exhibi- tion of 1862, I was forcibly impressed with the structural truth of one or two of these works. One especially commended itself to me as a fine structural work of classic character. Just as I was expressing my admiration, the exhibitor threw open the doors of this well-formed wardrobe to show me its internal fittings, when, fancy my feelings at beholding the first door bearing with it, as it opened, the two pilasters that I conceived to be the supports of the somewhat heavy cornice above, and the other door bearing away the third support, and thus leaving the super- incumbent mass resting on the thin sides of the structure only, while they appeared altogether unable to perform the duty imposed upon them. " Horrible ! horrible ! was all I could exclaim. Some of the most costly works of furniture shown by the French in the last Paris International Exhibition were not free from this defect ; and this is strange, for to the rightly constituted mind this one defect is of such a grave character as to neutralise whatever pleasure might otherwise be derived from contemplating the work. We see a man, a genius perhaps — a man having qualities that all must admire; but he has one great vice — one sin which easily besets him. While the J 66 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. man has excellent and estimable qualities, we yet avoid him, for we see not the excellences but the vice. It is so with such works o£ furniture as those of which we have been speaking-, for their defects are such as impress us more powerfully than their excellences. Respecting these works of furniture, this should be said : they are more or less imitative of works of a debased art-period — of a period in which structural truth was utterly disregarded — yet this is no reason why we should copy the defects of our ancestors. Infinitely worse than the works just spoken of, is falsely constructed Gothic furniture, where the very truthfulness of structure is openly set before us. Not long since I was staying with a client whose house is of Gothic style. Being about to furnish drawings for the decorations of this mansion, I was carefully noting the character of the architecture and of the furniture, which latter had been designed and manufactured expressly for the house by a large Yorkshire firm of cabinet-makers. The structure of the furniture appeared just, the proportions tolerably good, the wood honest, and the inlays judicious ; but, can it be imagined, the whole was a mere series of frauds and shams — the cross-grain ends of what should be supports were attached to the fronts of drawers, pillars came away, and such falsity became apparent as I never before saw. How any person could possibly produce such furniture, be he ever so degraded, I cannot think. I have seen works that are bad, I have seen falsities in art, but I never before saw such falsity of structure and such uncalled-for deception as these works presented. The untrue is always offensive ; but when a special effort is made at causing a lie to appear as truth, a double sense of disappointment is experienced when the untruthfulness is discovered. In his work on " Household Taste," to which I have before alluded, Mr. Eastlake objects, and I think very justly, to the character of an ordinary telescopic dining- table. He says : "Among the dining-room appointments, the table is an article of furniture which stands greatly in need of reform. It is generally made of planks of polished oak or mahogany laid upon an insecure framework of the same material, and supported by four gouty legs, ornamented by the turner with mouldings which look like inverted cups and saucers piled upon an attic baluster. I call the framework insecure, because I am describing what is commonly called a ' telescope ' table, or one which can be pulled out to twice its usual length, and, by the addition of extra leaves in its middle, accommodate twice the usual number of diners. Such a table cannot be soundly made in the same sense that ordinary furniture is sound ; it must depend for its support on some contrivance which is not consistent with the material of which it is made. Few people would like to sit on a chair the legs of which slid in and out, and were fastened at the required height by a pin ; there would be a sense of insecurity in the notion eminently unpleasant. You might put up with such an invention in camp, or on a sketching expedition, but to have it and use it THE FALSE IN VTTRNITUEE. 67 under your own roof, instead of a strong- and scrvieealjle cliair, would be absurd. Yet this is very much what we do in the case of the modern dining-room table. When it is extended it looks weak and untidy at the sides ; when it is reduced to its shortest length the legs appear heavy and ill-proportioned. It is always liable to get out of order, and from the very nature of its construction must be an inartistic object. Why shoiild such a table be made at all ? A dining-room is a room to dine in. Whether there are few or many people seated for that purpose, the table might well be kept of a uniform length, and if space is an object it is always possible to use in its stead two small tables, each on four legs. . These might be placed end to end when dinner parties are given, and one of them would suffice for family use. A table of this kind might be solidly and stoutly framed, so as to last for ages, and become, as all fur- niture ought to become, an heir- loom in the family. When a man builds himself a house on freehold land, he does not intend that it shall only last his lifetime ; he bequeaths it in sound condition to posterity. We ought to be ashamed of furniture which is continually being replaced ; at all events, we cannot possil^ly take any interest in such furniture. In former days, when the principles of good joinery were really understood, the legs of such a large table as that of the dining- room would have been made of a very different form from the lumpy, pear-shaped things of modern use." In nearly all these remarks I agree with Mr. Eastlake, and especially in his remark that, owing to the very nature of its construction, a modern dining-table must.be an inartistic object. No work can be satisfactory in which any portions of the true supporting structure or frame are drawn apart; and this occurs to a marked degree in this table, as is sho-«Ti in Mr. Eastlake's illustration, which we here copy (Fig. 43). Falsities of structure, althougli not so glaring as that of the telescopic dining- table, are everywhere met with in our shops, and, curious as it may appear, the great majority of the works offered to the public are not only false in structure, but are utterly offensive to good taste in every way, and are formed almost exclusively of 68 PRINCIPT.ES OF DESIGN. wood cut across the g-vain^ which secures to the article the maximum amount of weakness. Tig's. 44', 45, 46, and 47 are examples of utterly bad furniture. Fig. 46. Fi^. 47. Another falsity in furniture is veneering — a practice which should be wholly abandoned. Simple honesty is preferable to false show in all cases ; truthfulness in utterance is always to be desired. It was customary at one time to veneer almost VENEERING. every work of furniture, and even to place the grain of tlie veneer in a manner totally at variance ■with the true structure of the framework which it covered. This was a method of making works, which might in tlieir unfinished state be satisfactory, appear when finished as most unsatisfactory objects. Since this time much progress has been made in a knowledge of truthful structure and of truthful expression, yet this method of giving a false surface by means of veneer is not wholly abandoned as despicable and false. A few months back I had occasion to visit a cabinet warehouse in Lancashire, and the owner called my attention to the fine grain of some old English oak, and remarked that certain pieces of furniture were of solid wood. Ujwn investigation, however, I discovered that while the furniture in question was made throughout of oak, the bulk of the structure was of common wainscoting, and the surface was veneered with English oak. I confess that I would miich rather have had the furniture without its false exterior, and daily my love for fine grain in wood gets less. I think that this arises from the fact that strong grain in wood takes from the " unity " of the work into which it is formed, and tends to break it up into parts, by rendering every member conspicuous. What is wanted in a work of furniture, before all other considerations, is a fine general form — a harmony of all parts— so that no one member usurps a primary place — and this it is almost im- possible to achieve if a wood is employed having a strongly marked grain. With us a room is considered as almost unfurnished if the wiudows are not hung with some kind of drapery. The original object of this drapery was that of keeping out a draught of air, which found its way through the imperfectly fitting windows ; and the antitype of our window-hangings was a simple curtain, formed of a material suitable to achieve the purpose sought. Such a curtain was legitimate and desirable, and would contrast strangely with the elaborate festooning and quadrupled curtains of our present windows. We daily see yards of valuable material, arranged in massive and absurd folds, shutting out that light which is necessary to our health and well-being ; a pair of heavy stuff curtains and a pair of lace curtains being hung at each window, each curtain consisting of a sufil- cient amount of material to more than cover the window of itself. An excess of drapery is always vulgar, while a little drajiery usefully and judiciously employed is pleasant. Many windows that are well made, and thus keep out all currents of air, need no curtains. If the window mouldings are of an architectural character, and are coloured much darker than the wall, so as to become an obvious frame to the window, and thus do for the window what a picture-frame does for a picture, no curtains will be required. I have recently had a wonderfully striking illustration of this. Two adjoining rooms are alike in their architecture^ one is decorated, and has the window casement of such colours as strongly contrast, while they are yet harmonious, with 70 PIHNCIPLES OF DESinX. the wall. Before the I'oom was decorated^ and the windows were thus treated, a general light coloui* prevailed, both on the wood-work and on the walls of the room, and curtains were hung at the windows in the usual way. With the altered decora- tions, the windows became so effective that I at once saw the undesirability of re-hanging the curtains, and yet not one of all my Fig. 48. friends has observed that there are no cur- tains to the windows; while i£ the curtains are removed from the adjoining room, where the window-frames are as light as the walls, the first question asked is, " Where are your curtains Curtains should be hung on a simple and obvious jjole (Fig. 48). All means of hiding this pole are foolish and useless. This pole need not be very thick, and is better formed of wood than of metal, for then the rings to which the cm-tains are attached pass along almost noiselessly. Tlie ends of the pole may be of metal, but I prefer simple balls of wood. The pole may be grooved, and any little ./ enrichments mny be introduced into ^ these grooves, providing the carving does not come to the surface, and thus touch the ring-s, which l>y their ^ motion would injure it. Whatever is used in the way of enrichment should lie of simple character, for ' ' ~ ^ the height at which the curtain pole is placed would render fine work I altogether ineffective. ^^^fc As to upholstery, I would say, never indulge in an excess. A wood Fig-. 4y. frame should appear in every work of furniture, as in the examples we have given. Sofas are now made as though they were feather beds ; they are so soft that you sink into them, and become uncomfortably warm by merely resting upon them, and their gout.y forms are relieved only by a few inches of wood, which appear as legs. Stuffing should be employed only as a means of rendering a properly constructed seat comfortably soft. If it goes beyond this it is vulgar UPHOLSTERING OF FURKITURE. — PICTURE-FEAMES. rig. 50 72 PRINCIPLES or DESIGN. and objectionable. Spring stuffing is not to be altogether commended ; a good old-fashioned hair-stuffed seat is more desirable, as it will endure when springs have perished. As to the materials with which seats may be covered I can say little, for they are many. Hair cloth, although very durable, is altogether inartistic in its effect. Nothing is better than leather for dining-room chairs ; Utrecbt velvet, either j^lain or embossed, looks well on library chairs ; silk and satin damasks, rep, plain cloth, and many other fabrics are appropriate to drawing-room furniture. Chintz I am not fond of as a chair covering, and in a bed-room I would rather have chairs with plain wooden seats than with cushions covered with this glazed material. With a mere remark nY>on picture-frames I will finish this chapter. Picture- frames are generally elaborately carved mouldings, or are simple mouldings covered with ornaments, which, whether carved or formed of putty, are overlaid with gold leaf; they are, indeed, highly ornamented gilt mouldings. I much prefer a well-formed, yet somewhat simple, black polished moulding, on the interior of which runs a gold bead (Fig. 49). A fanciful yet good picture-frame was figured in the Buildiiir; Neivs of September 7th, 18G6, which we now repeat (Fig. 50). CHAPTER IV. DECORATION OF BUILDINGS. Division I. — General Considerations — Ceilings. Having considered furniture, the formation of which requires a knowledge of construction, or of what we may term structural art, we pass on to notice principles involved in the decoration of surfaces, or in " surface decoration,^' as it is usually called. We commence by considering how rooms should be decorated; yet, in so doing, we are met at the very outset with a great difficxilty, as the nature of the decoration of a room should be determined by the character of its architecture. My difficulty rests here. How am I to tell you what is the just decoration for a room, when the suitability of the decoration is often dependent upon even structural and ornamental details ; and when, in all cases, the character of the decoration should be in harmony with the character of the architecture ? Broadly, if a building is in the Gothic style, all that it contains in the way of decoration, and of furniture also, should be Gothic. If the building is Greek, the decorations and furniture should be Greek. If the building is Italian, all its decorations and furniture should be Italian, and so on. But there are further requirements. Each term that I have now employed, as expressive of a style of architecture, is more or less generic in character, and is therefore too broad for general use. What is usually termed Gothic architecture, is a group of styles having common origin and resemblances, known to the architect as the Semi-Norman or Transition style, which occurred in the twelfth century under Henry II. (it was at this time that the jwinted arch was first employed). The Early English, which was developed in the end of the twelfth and early part of the thirteenth century, under Richard I., John, and Henry III. ; the Decorated, which occurred at the end of the thirteenth, and early portion of the fourteenth centur}'', under Edward I., Edward II., and Edward III. ; the Perpendicular, which occurred at the latter part of the foui'tcenth, and through the greater portion of the fifteenth century, under Richard II., Henry IV., V., and VI., Edward IV. and V., and Richard III. ; and, lastly, the Tudor, which occurred at the end of the fifteenth, and the beginning of the sixteenth century, under Henry VII. and Henry VIII. All these styles are popularly spoken of as one, and are expressed by the one term — Gothic. It is so also, to an extent, with the Greek, Roman, and Italian styles, for each of these appears in various modifications of character, but into such details we K 74 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. will not enter ; it must suffice to notice that the character of the decoration must he not only hroadly in the style of the architecture of the building which it is intended to beautify, but it must be similar in nature to the ornament produced at precisely the same date as the architecture which has been employed for the building'. It must not be supposed that I am an advocate of reproducing works, or even styles of architecture, such as were created in times gone by, for I am not. The peoples of past ages carefully sought to ascertain their wants — the wants resulting from climate — the wants resulting from the nature of their religion — the wants resulting from social arrangements — the wants imjjosed by the building material at command. We, on the contrary, look at a hundred old buildings, and without considering our wants, as differing from those of our forefathers, take a bit from one and a bit from another, or we reproduce one almost as it stands, and thus we bungle on, instead of seeking to raise such buildings as are in all respects suited to our modern requirements. Things are, however, much better in this respect than they were. Bold men are dealing with the Gothic style in its various forms. Scott, Burgess, Street, and many others are venturing to alter it ; and thus, while it is losing old characteristics, and is acquiring new elements, it is already assuming a character which has nobility of expression, truthfulness of structure, and suitability to our special requirements. In time to come, further changes will doubtless be made ; and thus the style which arose as an imitation of the past will have become new, through constantly departing from the original type, and as constantly adopting new elements. I have said that the decoration of a building should be brought about by the em- ployment of such ornament as was, in time past, associated with the pai'ticular form of architecture employed in the building to be decorated, if a precisely similar form of architecture previously existed. Let not the ornament, however, be a mere servile imitation of what has gone before, but let the designer study the ornament of bygone ages till he understands and feels its spirit, and then let him strive to produce new forms and new combinations in the sjjirit of the ornament of the past. This must also be carefully noted — that the ornament of a particular period does not consist merely of the forms employed in the architecture, drawn in colour on the wall, or the ceiling, as the case may be. The particular form of ornament used in association with some forms of Gothic architecture was very different in character from what we might expect from the nature of the architecture itself, and did not to any extent consist of flatly-treated crockets, gable ends, trefoils, cinque- foils, etc. The ornament of the past must be studied in its purity, and not from those wretched attempts at the production of Gothic decoration which we often see. In what we may call the typical English house of the present day there is really no architecture, and if such a building is to be decollated it is almost legitimate to emj^loy any style of ornamentation. In such a case I should choose a style DECORATION OF CEILINGS. 75 which has iio very raarked features — which is not strongly Greek, or strong-ly Gothic, or strongly Italian ; and if there is the necessary ability, I should say try and produce ornaments having novelty of character, and yet showing your knowledge of the good qualities of all styles that are past. If this is attempted, care must be exercised in order to avoid getting a mere combination of elements from various styles as one ornament. Nothing can be worse than to see a bit of Greek, a fragment of Egyptian, an Alhambraic scroll, a Gothic flower, and an Italian husk associated together as one ornament ; unless this were done advisedly and in order to meet a very special want, such an ornamental composition would be detestable. What I recommend is the production of new forms ; but the new composition may have the vigour of the best Gothic ornament, the severity of Egyptian, the intri- cacy of the Persian, the gorgeousness of the Alhambra, and so on, only it must not imitate in detail the various styles of the past. Now as to the decoration of a room. If one part only can be decorated, let that one part be the ceiling. Nothing appears to me more strange than that our ceilings, which can be properly seen, are usually white in middle-class houses, while the Avails, which are always in part hidden, and even the floor, on which we tread, should have colour and pattern applied to them ; and of this I am certain, that, considered from a decorative point of view, our ordinary treatment is wrong. We glory in a clear blue sky overhead, and we speak of the sky as increasing in beauty as it becomes deeper and deeper in tint. Thus the depth of the tint of the Italian sky is familiar to us all. Why, then, make our ceilings white ? I often ask this question, and am told that the whiteness I'enders the ceiling almost invisible ; hence it is preferred. This idea is very absurd ; first, because blue is the most ethereal and most distant of all colours (see Chap. II., page 33) ; and, second, do we not build a house with the view of procuring shelter ? hence why do we seek to realise the feeling that we are without a covering over our heads ? We only like a white ceiling because we have been accustomed to such from infancy, and because we have been taught to regard a clean white ceiling as all that is to be desired. I knew a Yorkshire lady who, upon being asked by her husband whether she would like the drawing-room ceiling decorated, replied that she thought not, as she could not then have it re-whitewashed every year. The idea was clean certainly. Blue, I have said, is ethereal in character; it is so, and may become exceedingly so if of medium depth and of a grey hue ; hence, if a mere atmospheric effect was sought, it would be desirable that this colour be used on the ceiling rather than white. But, as we have just said, invisibility of the ceiling is absurd, as it is our protection from the weather. Further, the ceiling may become an object of great beauty, and it can be seen as a whole. Why then neglect the opjiortunity of arranging a beautiful object when there is no reason to the contrary? We like a beautiful coloured vase, or, if we do not, we can have it whitewashed, or even dispense with it altogether. 7(1 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. We like beautiful walls, or we would have them whitewashed also ; indeed, we like our surrounding-s generally beautiful. Why not, then, have beautiful ceilings. Fig. 51. especially as they can be seen complete, while the wall is in part hidden by furniture and pictures ? I will suppose that we have an ordinary room to deal with. First, take awaj PAIEIiS FOP. CEILIXGS. 77 the wretched plaster ornament in the centre of the ceiling, for it is sure to be bad. There is not one such ornament out of a thousand that can be so treated as to make the ceiling look as well as it would do without it. Now place all over the ceiling a flat painted or stencilled pattern, a pattern which repeats equally in all directions (as Fig. 51), and let this pattern be in blue (of any depth) and white, or in blue (of any depth) and cream-colour, and it is sure to look well (the blue being the ground, and the cream-colour or white the ornament) . Simple patterns in cream-colour on blue ground, but having a black outline, also look well (Fig. 52); and these might be prepared in paper, and hung on the ceiling as common paper-hangings, if cheapness is essential. Gold ornaments on a deep blue ground, with black out- line, also look rich and efl'ective. These are all, however^ simple treat- ments, for any amount of colour may be used on a ceiling, provided the colours are employed in very small masses, and perfectly min- gled, so that the effect produced is that of a rich coloured bloom (see Chap. II., page 4G). A ceiling should be beautiful, and should also be manifest ; but if it must be somewhat indistinct, in order that the caprices of the ignorant be humoured, let the pattern be in middle-tint or pale blue and white only. I like to see the ceiling of a room covered all over with a suitable pattern, but I do not at all object to a large central ornament only, or to a centre ornament and corners ; especially if the cornice is heavy, so as to give compensating weight to the margin. I have recently designed and seen carried out one or two centre ornaments for drawing-rooms, which ornaments were twenty-one feet in diameter. A centre ornament, if properly treated, may be very large without looking heavy ; it may, indeed, extend at least two-thirds of the way from the centre to the margin of the ceiling. I do not speak of plaster ornaments, but of flat decorations. If the ceiling is flat all ornament j^laced upon it must not only be flat also, but Fig. 78 PRIXCTPLES or DESIGN. must not fictitiously represent relief^ for no shaded ornament can be pleasant when l^laced as the decoration of a flat architectural surface. I have already noticed that the decoration of a room should be in character with its architecture, but that while this should be so, the ornament applied by way of enrichment should not be a servile copy of the decorative forms employed in Fig 53. ages gone by, but should be such as is new in character, while yet of the spirit of the past. Many circumstances tend to determine the nature of the decoration which should be applied to a ceiling : thus, if a ceiling is structurally divided into square panels, the character of the ornament is thereby restricted, and should these panels be large it will probably be desirable that each be fitted with the same ornament ; while if they are small three or four different patterns may be employed, if arranged in some orderly or methodical manner. TREATMEXT OP JOISTS IN A CEILING. 79 A ceiling may also have the joists or beams visible upon it : in this case the decoration would have to be of a very special character. The bottoms of the joists Fig. 54. mig'ht have a string" pattern upon them (a running pattern), as the " Greek key," or guilloche ; whilst the sides might have either a running pattern, or a pattern with an upward tendency, as the ''Greek honeysuckle;" and the ceiling intervening 80 PRINCIPLES or DESIGIf. between the joists might have a nnming pattern, or better, a star, or diaper pattern, or it mig-ht have bands running in the opposite direction to the joists, so as, with them, to form scjuares, which squares mig-ht be filled with ornament. If, however, the ceiling is flat, and is not divided into sections structurally, Fig. 55. almost any " setting out" of the surface may be employed, as Fig. 53; or a large centre ornament, as Figs. 54' and 55 ; or a rosette distributed over the entire surface, as Fig. 56. In any case it is not necessary or even desirable that the ornament be in relief upon the ceiling. Flatly treated ornaments may be employed with advantage, and all fictitious appearance of relief, as we have already said, must be avoided. COLOl'RIXG OF FLAT CEILINGS. 81 f There are so many different ways of setting out ceilings, that I cannot attempt even to make any suggestions. I would simply say, however, Avoid an archi- tectural setting out, if there are no structural members ; for ornament which is flat may spread in any manner over a surface without even appearing to need structural supports. As to the colour of a ceiling if there is to be no ornament upon it, let it be a cream-colour (formed of white with a little middle-chrome) rather than white. Gream-colour always looks well upon a ceiling, and gives the idea of purity. A grey-blue is also a veiy desirable colour for a ceiling, such as is formed of pale ultramarine, white, and a little raw umber, just suffi- cient to make the blue slightly grey (or atmos- pheric) . In depth this blue should be about half-way between the . ultramarine and white. Another effect which I like is produced by the full colour of pure (or almost pure) ultramarine. In this case the cornice should be carefully coloured, and pale blue and white should prevail "in it, but a little pure red must be present. A further and very de- sirable effect is produced by placing pale cream-coloured stars irregularly over the pale blue, or even the deep blue ceiling, or by placing pale blue stars upon the cream-coloured ceiling. The stars should vary for an ordinary room ceiling (say a room sixteen feet square by ten feet high) from about three inches from point to point down to one inch ; the larger stars having six points ; others being smaller and with five points ; and the small ones having, some four points, and some three. If such stars are irregulai-ly (without order) intermixed over the ceiling, and yet are somewhat equally dispersed, a very pleasing and interesting effect will thereby be produced. This effect is in much favour with the Japanese. The stai's, however, should be smaller if placed on a deep, than on a pale, blue ground. Another good effect is produced by giving the ceiling the colour of Bath, or Portland, stone, and starring it with a deeper tint of the same colour. This effect L Fig. 56. 82 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. is improved by each star having a very fine outline of a yet darker tint of the same colour. I should recommend those interested in the decoration of ceilings to study carefully the Egyptian^ Alhambra, and Greek Courts at the Crystal Palace, Sydenham^ especially the two last named ; also to notice the ceiling in St. Jameses Great Hall, Piccadilly, London, and the ceiling of Ushaw College chapel near Durham. The ceilings in the Oriental Courts, by Mr. Owen Jones, at the South Kensington Museum are worthy of careful notice ; but the Renaissance ceilings in other parts of the Museum are both wrong in principle and are bad examples of their style. The structurally formed glass ceiling of the Crystal Palace Bazaar in Oxford Street, London, and still better, the ceiling of Mr. Osier's glass warehouse in Oxford Street, are well worthy of note. On the Continent we very frequently meet with ceilings on which large pictures have been painted, as in the Louvre and the Luxembourg in Paris ; and the authorities of the South Kensington Museum are making efforts to introduce this style into England, but such pictorial ceilings are in every way wrong. 1st. A ceiling is a flat surface, hence all decoration placed upon it should be flat also. 2nd. A picture can only be correctly seen from one point, whereas the deco- ration of a ceiling should be of such a character that it can be properly seen from any part of the room. 3rd. Pictures have almost invariably a right and wrong way upwards. A picture placed on a ceiling is thus wrong way upwards to almost all the guests in the room. 4th. In order to the proper understanding of a picture, you must see the whole of its surface at one time ; this is very diflScult to do without almost breaking your neck, or being on your back on the floor, if the picture is on the ceiling ; whereas an ornament which consists of repeated parts may render a ceiling beautiful without requiring that the whole ceiling be seen at the one g-lance. Most of the French pictorial ceilings are so painted that they are properly seen when the spectator stands with his back close to the fire. This is very awkwai*d, as the rules of society do not allow us to stand in this position before company. Pictorial works are altogether out of place on a ceiling ; they ought to be framed and hung right way upwards upon walls where they can be seen. We have a well- known painted ceiling at the Greenwich Hospital. Arabesque ceilings, such as that of the Roman Court at the Crystal Palace, are also very objectionable. What can be worse than festoons of leafage, like so many sausages, painted upon a ceiling, with grifiins, small framed pictures, impossible flowers, and feeble ornament, all with fictitious light and shade ? But not fx)ntent with such absm'dities WALL DECORATIONS. 83 and incongruities^ the festoons often hang upwards on vaulted or domed ceilings, rather than downwards. Such ornaments arose when Rome, intoxicated with its conquests, yielded itself up to luxury and vice rather than to a consideration of beauty and truth. Decorations like these were to an extent again revived by the great painter Raphael ; but it must ever be remembered that Raphael, while one of the greatest of painters, was no ornamentist. It requires all the energy of a life to become a great painter; and it requires all the energy of a life to become a great ornamentist; hence it is not expected that the one man should be great at the two arts. In all ages when decorative art has flourished, ceilings have been decorated. The Egyptians decorated their ceilings, so did the Greeks, the Byzantines, the Moors, and the people of our Middle Ages, and a light ceiling appears not to have been esteemed as essential, or as in many cases desirable. It is strange that so few of our houses and public buildings contain rooms vnth decorated ceilings ; but the want is already felt, the fashion has set in, and many are at this present moment being prepared. We must get simple modes of enrichment for general rooms — modes of treatment which shall be effective, and yet not expensive — and then we may hope that they will become general. Division II. — Decorations op Walls. We must now devote ourselves to the consideration of wall decoration, or to the manner in which ornament should be applied to walls with the view of rendering them decorative. It will appear absurd to say that all ornament that is applied to a wall should be such as will render the wall more beautiful than it would be without it ; but this statement is needed, for I have seen many walls ornamented in such a manner, that they would have looked much better if they had been perfectly plain, and simply washed over with a tint of cJour. To ornament is to beautify. To decorate is to ornament. But a surface cannot be beautified unless the forms which are drawn upon it are graceful, or bold, or vigorous, or true, and unless the colours applied to it are harmonious. Yet how many walls do we meet with even in good houses — walls of corridors, walls of stair- cases, walls of dining-rooms, walls of libraries, and, indeed, walls of every kind of room — which are rendered offensive, rather than pleasing, by the decorations they bear. A wall may look well without decoration strictly so called, and this statement leads me to notice the various ways in which walls may be treated with the view of rendering them beautiful. A wall may be simply tinted either with "distemper" colour, or oil colour " flatted." Distemper colour gives the best effect, and is much the cheajiest, but it is not durable, and cannot be washed. Oil colour when flatted makes a nice wall, '84 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN'. whether "stippled" or plain, and is Ijoth duraljle and washable. An entire wall . should never be varnished. I say that a wall can look well even i£ not decorated. Let me give one or two Fig. 57. instances ; but, perhaps, I had better g-ive treatments for the entire room, including the ceiling, and not for the wall simply. A good effect of a very plain and inexpensive character would be produced by having a black skirting, a cream-colour wall (this colour to be made of the Fig. .09. colour called middle-chrome and white, and to resemble in depth the best pure cream), a cornice coloured with pale blue of greyish tint, with deep blue, white, and a slight line of red, and a ceiling of blue of almost any depth. The ceiling colour to be pure French ultramarine, or this ultramarine mixed with white and a touch of raw umber (the cornice blues to be made in the same way). The red Decorative design. WALL DECORATIONS. 85; in the cornice to be deep vermilion if very narrow (one-sixteenth of an inch), or carmine if broad.* A room of a slightly more decorative character would be produced by making the lower three feet of the wall of a difPerent colour (by forming a dado) from the upper part of the wall : thus, if the other parts of the room were coloured as in the example just given, the lower three feet might be red (vermilion toned to a rich Indian red with ultramarine blue) or chocolate (purple-brown and white, with a little orange-chrome) ; this lower portion of the wall being separated from, the upper cream-coloured portion by a line of black an inch broad, or better by a double line, the upper line being an inch broad, and the lower line three- eighths of an inch, the lines being separated from each other by five- eig'hths of the red or chocolate. I like the formation of a dado, for it affords an opportunity of giving apparent stability to the wall by making its lower portion dark ; and furniture is invariably much improved by being seen against a dark back- ground. The occupants of a room always look better when viewed in conjunction with a dark background, and ladies' dresses certainly do. The dark dado gives the desired back- ground without rendering it necessary that the entire wall be dark. If the furniture be mahogany, it will be wonderfully improved by being placed against a chocolate wall. The dado of a room need not be plain; indeed, it may be enriched to any extent. It may be plain with a bordering separating it from the wall, such as -Figs. 57, 58, and 59, or the coloured border on Plate I. (frontispiece) ; or it may have a simple dower regularly dispersed over it ; or it may be covered with a geometrical repeating pattern, in either of which cases it would have a border; or it may be enriched with a specially designed piece of ornament, as Fig. 60. This particular pattern should not, however, be enlarged to a height of more than twenty * In some part? of the country it is customai-y to wash tlie cornice over with qnick-lime. If this has been done the lime must be carefully removed, for lime will turn carmine black. 86 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. to twenty-four inches ; but if of this width, and above a skirting of twelve or fifteen inehesj it would look well. I have designed two or three narrow dado papers for Messrs. Wylie and Lockhead, of Glasgow, which are about eighteen inches broad, and are printed in the direction of the length of the paper, so as to save unnecessary joins ; and Messrs. Jeffrey and Co., of Essex Road, Islington, are issuing a complete series of my decorations for walls, dados, and ceilings. If the dado is en- riched with ornament, and the cornice is coloured, and a pattern spreads all over the ceiling, the walls can well be plain, but they may be covered with a simple "powdering" as the patterns in Fig. 61, if these are in soft colours, or with patterns such as those set forth in colours on Plate I. ; but these, especially that on the blue ground, would only be used where a very rich effect is desired. A good room would be produced by pattern Fig. 52 being on the ceiling in dark bine and cream-colour, by the cornice being coloured with a pre- valence of dark blue, the walls being cream-colour down to the dado ; the border separating the dado from the wall being black ornament on a dull orange-colour; and by the dado being chocolate with a black rosette upon it ; the skirting boards being bright black. The dado may or may not be varnished; the upper part of the wall can only be "dead" (not varnished — dull). If the room is high a bordering ma}' run round the ujiper portion of the wall, about three to four inches W' w 4m ' Fipf. CI. WALL-PAPERS. 87 below the cornice ; such a border as Fig. 62 may be employed in dull orange and chocolate. A citrine wall comes well with a deep blue, or blue and white ceilings if blue prevails in the cornice, and this wall may have a dark blue (ultramarine and black with a little white) dado, or a rich maroon dado (brown-lake) . If the blue dado is employed the skirting should be indigo, which, when varnished and seen in eon- junction with the blue, will appear as black as jet. (See the coloured examples on Plate II., and remarks on colour on pages 45 and 40.) Walls are usually papered in middle-class houses. I must not object to this universal custom ; but I do say, try to avoid showing the joinings of the various strips. In all cases where possible cut the paper to the pattern, and not in straight lines, for straight joinings are very objectionable. If you use paper for walls, use it Fig. 62. artistically, and not as so much paper. Let a dado be formed of one paper, the dado bordering (dado rail) of a suitable paper bordering ; the upper part of the wall being covered by another paper of simple and just design, and of such colour as shall harmonise with the dado. Proceed as an artist, and not as a mere workman. Think out an ornamental schema, and then try to realise the desired effect. Avoid all papers in which huge bunches of flowers aiid animals or the human figure are depicted. The best for all purposes are those of a simple geometrical character, or in which designs similar to those in Fig. 61 are "powdered" or placed at regular intervals over a plain ground. Just as the ceiling ornament must accord in character with the architecture of the room in which it is placed, so must the wall decoration be of the same style as the architecture of the room. Indeed, whatever we have said respecting the harmony of the ceiling decoration with the architectm-e of the building, applies equally to the ornamentation of the wall. It has been customary to arrange walls into panels when decorating them, and 88 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. of this mode of treatment we give one illustration (Fig. 63) j yet nothing can be more absurd than such a treatment^ unless the wall is architecturally (structurally) arched. A wall may be so formed that some parts are thick^ so as to give the required strength, while other jwrtions are thin. In such a case the wall would be formed of arched recesses and thickened piers alternately. This being the ease, the decoration should be so applied as to emphasise, or render apparent, this arched structure ; but if the wall is of one thickness throughout, its division into arches is absurd and foolish. We sometimes see great follies, and even gross untruths, perpetrated with the view of bi-inging about the so-called decoration of a room. Thus it is not SIIAJrS IN DECOEATION'. 89 unfrequently that we meet with imitation pillars, recesses, and arches as the so-called ornamentation of a room. In low music halls we are not surprised hj such decorations, for we do not look for truth or any manifestation of delicacy of feeling' in such places. Falsity and the untrue appear in natural juxtaposition with the debased and the vulgar. Sham marble pillars, a fictitious and merely imitative architecture, an assumed and unreal, yet coarse and vulgar, gorgeousness, are the natural adjuncts of immorality and vice ; but such falsities cannot be tolerated in the abodes of those who pretend to purity and truth, nor in the buildings which they frequent; yet even the new Albert Hall has sham marble pillars (I say this to our shame), and but recently I visited a church near Edgware, in which there is a display of false decoration such as I never before saw. Here we find sham pillai-s, giving a false architecture ; sham nichesj containing sham statues ; sham clouds, forming an absurd ceiling j and almost every falsity which a falsely constituted mind could perpetrate. How strange it is that in a church, where purity and truth are taught, the whole of the decorations should be a sham ! It is said that if you want to hear a fierce quarrel, and to see true hatred, you must seek it in religious sects and among theological discussionists. On the same principle, I siippose, we must prepare ourselves for a display of the worst art-falsity in the sacred edifice. Perhaps the idea is that of contrast. As the teetotal lecturer had a drunken man by him as a frightful example of what was to be avoided, so the decorations of this church may be intended as a warning, rather than as an example of what should be followed. Happily such churches as this are rare, and it can be truly said that ecclesiastical architecture and decoration has made great strides with us in recent years, and that in very many instances it is rigidly truthful as well as beautiful. Before leaving the consideration of wall decorations, I must object to all imitations, as sham marbles, granites, etc., for no wall can be satisfactory which is to any extent a display of false grandeur ; and this is curious, that in many cases it costs more to produce an imitation marble staircase than it would to line the same walls with the marbles imitated. I have known a case in which the imitation has cost double what the genuine stone would have cost, and such a case is not exceptional, for hand-polished work is always expensive. To imitations of marbles and granites, as I have already said, I strongly object, and of the genuine stone I am not fond, unless sparingly and judiciously used. My objections to its free use are these : — 1st. Harmony of colour depends upon great exactness of tint. This exactness is rarely attainable in the case of two marbles. One stone may, however, be brought into direct and perfect harmony with a coloured wall, by the tint of the wall being carefully suited to the marble. 2nd. The true artist thinks less of the costliness of the material of which he forms his works than of the art-effect produced. Thus the old Greeks, who were full of art-feeling and refinement, coloured the M 90 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. buildings •wliicli they constructed of wliito marble, and they certainly thereby ■improved them ; for colour, if harmoniously employed, lends to objects a new charm — a charm which they would not without it possess. I must further say, before leaving- our present subject, that all walls, however decorated, should serve as a background to whatever stands in front of them. Thus they must retire even behind the furniture by their unobtrusiveness. The order of arrangement in furnishing must be this. The living beings in a room should be most attractive and conspicuous, and the dress of man should be of such a character as to secure this. Ladies can now employ any amount of colour in their attire ; but poor man, however noble, cannot by his dress be distinguished from his butler ; and, worst of all, both are dressed in an unbecoming and inartistic manner. Next come the furniture and draperies — the one or the other having prominence according to circumstances ; then come the wall and floor, both of which are to serve as backgrounds to all that stands in front of them. In decorating walls, or in judging of the merit or suitability of wall decorations, this must always be taken into consideration, that they are but enriched backgrounds ; and it should also be remembered that the nature of the enrichment applied is determined, to a great extent, by the character of the architecture of the building of which the wall forms a part. We come now to consider wall-papers, which are hangings prepared with the view of enabling us to decorate our walls at comparatively small cost. I may confess that I am not very fond of wall-papers under any circumstances. I prefer a tinted or painted wall. Yet they are largely used, and will be for a long time to come. I have already said that if wall-papers are used they should not be joined together with straight lines, and that we ought to consider them as so much art-material which should be used artistically. As to the nature of the pattern which a wall-paper should have, it is almost impossible to speak, as there are endless varieties ; but as a rule it may be said that those consisting of small, simple, repeated parts, which are low-toned or neutral in colour, are the best. Most wall-paper patterns are larger than is desirable. The pattern can scarcely be too simple, and it should in all cases consist of flat ornament. If the ornament is very g'ood, and the pattern is the work of a true artist, it may be larger, for then the parts will be balanced and harmonised in a manner that could not be expected from a less skilful hand; but even if by the most talented designer, it must ever be remembered that he has designed it at random, and not as a suitable decoration for any particular room. The man who selects the pattern for a particular wall must choose that which is suitable to the special case. The effect of a wall-paper is materially affected by many circumstances. Thus, by the quantity of light admitted to the room — whether the room is dark or light ; by the aspect, whether it receives the sun's rays direct or docs not ; by the character WAI.T.-I'APER PATTETiNS. 91 of the lig'ht, as whether direct from the sky, or reflected from a green lawn, or red-l)rick wall. All these thin.on carpets, let me say that, as designers, manufacturers, and consumers, we are one and all timid of new thing-s. We want daring — the energy to produce new things, to manufacture them, to use them. What if the pattern is " extreme," if it is better than others ? what if Mrs. Grundy should think us eccentric ? — better be eccentric than ever harping on one monotony. If we could but bear calmly the derisive smiles of the ignorant, art-progress would be easy. With us carpets cover the entire floor. In London these carpets are nailed to the boards, and but seldom taken up. In some parts of England we find rings sewn around the under edge of the carpet, which rings are looped to the heads of nails. Carpets so furnished can be more readily removed for cleaning than those which are 0 lOG rui>;cii'LEs OF dksigx. nailed to the floor. Square carpets^ such as the Turkey^ Indian^ and Persian^ are spread loosely on the boards, and can be taken up and shaken without diiliculty. This is unquestionably the most healthy plan of using a carpet, and it is also an artistic plan. If the outer portion of the room floor is formed of inlaid wood of simple and suitable pattern, and a loose square carpet is spread in the centre, we have an artistic effect, and the desirable knowledge that cleanliness is also attainable with a reasonable expenditure of labour. Before we leave the consideration of carpets we will state in axiomatic form the conditions which govern the application of ornament to them, as reference can more easily be made to short concise sentences than to more extended remarks. 1st. Carpet patterns may with advantage have a geometrical formation, for this gives to the mind an idea of order or arrangement. 2nd. When the pattern has not a geometrical basis, a general evenness of surface should be preserved. 3rd. Carpets are better not formed into " panels,''^ as though they were works of wood or stone ; on the contrary, they should have a general " all-over" effect without any great accentuation of particular parts. The Indian and Persian carpets meet this requirement. 4.th. While a carpet should present a general appearance of evenness, parts may yet be slightly " pronounced^'' or emphasised, so as to give to the mind the idea of centres from which the pattern radiates. 5th. A carpet should, in some respects, resemble a bank richly covered with flowers; thus, when seen from a distance the effect should be that of a general " bloom of colour ; when viewed from a nearer point it should present certain features of somewhat sijecial interest; and when looked at closely new beauties should make their appearance. 6th. As a floor is a flat surface, no ornamental covering placed on it should make it appear otherwise. 7th. A carpet, having to serve as a background to furniture, should be of a somewhat neutral character. 8th. Every carpet, however small, should have a border, which is as necessary to it as a frame is to a picture. , Having thus summarised the principles that govern the application of ornament to carpets, we may proceed to notice the conditions governing the decoration of other woven fabrics. CHAPTER VI. CURTAIN MATERIALS, HAIfGINGS, AI^D WOVEN FABRICS GENERALLY. In the consideration of hangings of various kinds, we have first to notice the nature of the cloth on which the pattern is to be worked — whether it is of oi^en or close texture. Fabrics of an open character should bear upon them a larger pattern than those which are thicker or closer. The openness or closeness of the fabric will thus determine, to an extent, the nature of the ornament which is to be placed upon it. Muslins, being open in character, should have larger patterns than calicoes, which are closer in texture, or the pattern will be indistinct in the one case or coarse in the other. But not only does texture influence the pattern when considered as to coarseness or fineness, but also the nature of the cloth as regards material. Thus silk will bear greater fulness of colour than muslins or calico-prints, owing to the fact that the lustre of the material, by reflecting light to the eye of the observer, destroys a certain portion of the intensity of the effect of colour which a less reflective material would exhibit. Silk, as a material, also conveys to the mind an idea of costliness or worth, and wherever the material does so the pattern may ho richer in colour than it should be in cheaper and commoner fabrics. If a pattern is in two tints of the same colour only, as in the case of those woven silks where the pattern is formed by the contrast of "tabby" and satin, it may be considerably larger than in those cases where it is rendered conspicuous by colours. This latter remark will apply also to damask table-linen, and to all similar materials, as well as to dress fabrics, and drajwries such as window hangings ; but of these we shall say a word shortly. The closeness or openness of a fabric should, then, be considered when we design patterns for its enrichment, and so should the nature of the material, as this will influence its deadness or lustre. But there are also other considerations which must not be lost sight of. If the pattern is to be wrought by printing, then one class of conditions must be complied with ; if by weaving, then another class of requirements call for consideration. The requirements of manufacture are much more numerous than might be supposed, and are in some cases very restrictive. The size of the repeat, the manner in which colour can be applied, the character of surface attainable, and many other considerations have to be carefully complied with before a pattern can appear as a manufactm-ed article. 103 PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. The chief fault of j^atterns^ as applied to fabrics generally^ is their want of simjjlieity — want of simple structure^ want of simple treatment^ want of simplicity of effect ; and together with this we generally find largeness and coarsenesss of parts. These errors arise chiefly out of a want of consideration of the capabilities of the material. What can be done with this or that particular fabric, is a question that we should carefully ask ourselves before we think of preparing a design. Have we colour at our disposal, or texture merely ? and if colour, can it be employed freely or only sparingly? and can any desired colours be placed in juxtaposition or only certain tints ? These are questions of great imj^ortance, and they should be asked and carefully considered before the first step is taken towards the formation of a pattern. ILiN ing ascertained what can be done with the material at command, let us ever remember that we should always endeavom* to so employ the capabilities of a material as to conceal its weakness and emphasise its more desirable effects. If this consideration were always given by designers to the power which the material has of yielding effects, we should see, in very many instances, effects strangely different from those which we often encounter ; and this remark applies to no class of fabrics more fully than to damask table-linen and coloured damask window hangings. No satisfactory effect can be got in light and shade upon any woven or printed fabric ; besides, to attempt such a mode of treatment is absurd. Lig'ht and shade belong only to pictorial art. The ornamentist when enriching a fabric deals only with a surface, and has no thought of placing pictures thereon ; he has simply to enrich or beautify tbat which without his art would be plain and unornamental. A picture will never bear repetition. "Who ever heard of a man having two copies of one picture in a room ? Yet how much more absurd is it to repeat a little picture — perhaps a pictorially rendered flower- — a hundred times over one surface ! Besides this, a surface must always be treated, for decorative purposes, as a surface, and not in a manner calculated to deceive by giving apparent relief, or thickness, to that whicb is essentially without thickness. Take a common damask table-cover. This is by custom almost always white, although it would be better if of a deep cream- colour, or soft buff; and the pattern which it bears results from a change of surface only (why a margin of " ingrain " colour is not added, I could never see) ; yet in nine cases out of ten the pattern which is presented by such a fabric is a miserable shaded- attempt at a pictorial treatment, and is also a thorough failure. Simplicity of pattern naturally accords with a simple mode of production, and the means of producing pattern in damasks is certainly most simple. That there is a natural harmony between simplicity of pattern and simple means of producing an art-effect is obvious, for of all patterns that I have ever seen ujion damask table- linen the simple spot, or dot, is the most satisfactory. If, combined with this spot, we have a border formed of a simple Greek " key-pattern," or of mere lines (a very DAMASK TABLE-LINEN. 109 usual border to g-ood cloths), the effect is perfectly satisfying-, and, as far as it goes, is highly to be commended. It is curious that this spot is only sold in the better quality of table-linen (at least so they tell me in the City), and this shows that the wealthy, or, in other words, the educated, buy such patterns, as they prefer the true to the meretricious, while the false and showy devices which we see on the common cloths please only the common people of vulgar taste. I am not sure, however, that many persons, whose means are limited, would not buy spots and other simple, but correctly treated, patterns, if such were to be got in common qualities of damask ; but when the pocket must govern the purchase, it is hard to say that the false is preferred to the true, if the true is not procurable with the means at command. While I cannot withhold praise from this little spot, it must not be thought that I thereby give to it a high place as an art-work. Little is here attempted, and that little is done well. But let us analyse this pattern. First, the spots are of one tint throughout, if I may thus express myself — a tint, shall we say, which is the reverse of that of the ground. It is not shaded so that it may appear as a ball or globe, and is not graduated in "colour" in any way (were it graduated or shaded, feebleness of effect must inevitably accrue), but is a simple, honest spot, treated as a surface ornament. Secondly, this spot is geometrically arranged, or, in other words, has an orderly arrangement. If an attempt is made at rendering a pictorial, or light-and-shade effect, in damask, an absurd failure can alone result, for depth of shade is not obtainable in the material ; and, besides this, what appears as shade, when the cloth is seen from one point of view, appears as light if seen from another point of view. Nothing could be more absurd, then, than seeking to produce shaded effects with such means as are here at our disposal. But were the fabric capable of rendering such effects, it would still be wrong to employ them, as we deal only with the surface, and are seeking to enhance the value of, or beautify, a fabric, and not to cover it with pictures. In our simple spot we have those elements which may be extended into the richest and most artistic damask patterns. We have order — as indicated by the geometrical plan of the pattern — and an honest and simple expression, or appli- cation, of the capabilities of the material. All table-covers should certainly have a border. Any object which is to be used as a whole looks unsatisfactory if it appears as though it were part of a whole. If a cloth is without border it is impossible to avoid the impression that it is a part of a larger cloth, and in every respect the general effect is decidedly imsatisfactory. It is perhaps well that we notice one peculiarity of a table-cover before we dismiss the consideration of siich fabrics, which is this, that while the central portion is seen flat, the border portion is viewed in folds ; and here we come to one of the great peculiarities of most draperies, that of their being viewed not as flat no PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN. surfaces, hut in waves or folds. One portion of a table-clotli is, however, seen flat, but this is almost an exception in the case of draperies. Another exception to this Fig. 89. Fig. 90. rule of hanging's appearing- in folds, and that of a very complete character, occurs in silk damasks which are used as a rich lining to the walls of palaces and some mansions ; but of table-cloths we will speak for the present. The central part of a table-cloth, that portion which is always to be viewed as TABLE-CLOTH PATTERNS. Ill a flat surface^ may be enriched with any diaper j)attern that is simply treated^ and this diaper pattern may be full of design, provided the parts are not too large or too small. It may also be formed of gracefully curved parts, or of straight lines or circles, or of any combination of these elements ; but, preferably, not wholly of straight lines. Were it not for the fact that much of this central portion of the cloth is to be covered by articles of the dinner-table, it might well be furnished with a central ornament, repeating only in quarters ; but as such an orna- ment, in order that it be satis- fying, requires to be seen as a whole, it is not desirable that such be here employed. A diaper pattern that repeats many times in (he centre is preferable, as the pattern can then be seen in a satisfactory manner. The border of a table-cloth, like all fabrics that are to be seen in folds, re