Price id. WHITEGHAPEL ART GALLERY HOUSE & HOME EXHIBITION May 31 to July 9, 191 1 13 noon to 9.30 p.m. Committee* Af fainted by the Trustees Rev. Canon Barnett, Mrs. Barnett. Mr. William C. Johnson, j.p., l.c.c. Mr. W.M. Blyth. Mr. Charles Aitken. Mr. Cecil C. Brewer. Mr. Michael Bunney. Miss L. J. Clarke. Mrs. Cox. Mr. Stanley T. Drew. Miss F. H. Durham. Miss A. M. Finlay. Mr. Owen Fleming. Mr. J. H. Gill. Mr. Ernest Gimson. Miss C. R. Gordon. Mr. G. Gummer. Mr. Ambrose Heal. Mr. Basil Holmes. Mr. Henry Holloway. Mr. J. C. Hudson. Hon. Gilbert Johnstone. Miss Susan Lawrence. Mrs. Leon. Prof. W. R. Lethaby, F.R.I.B.A. Mr. T. Alwyn Lloyd. Mr. Geoffrey Lucas, A.R.I.B.A. MlSS LUMSDEN. Miss E. A. Meadows. Mrs. Millington. Mr. Hugh Morgan. Sir Edward O'Malley. Mr. Lionel Pearson. Prof. Beresford Pite, F.R.I.B.A. Miss Plowright. Mr. Gerald Ritchie. Mr. Joseph Rowntree. Mr. M. H. Baillie Scott. Mrs. DUKINFIELD SCOTT. Mr. C. Spooner. Mrs. Spooner. Mr. R. M. Taylor. Mr. F. W. Troup, f.r.i.b.a. Mr. H. E. Turner. Mr. Henry Vivian. Mr. C. P. Wade. Mr. H. A. Welch. Mr. P. A. Wells. Mr. C. C. Winmill. Mr. Gilbert Ramsay, Acting Director. Mr. C. Campbell Ross, Secretary. IMPORTANT NOTICE. In going through the Lower Gallery you are asked to follow the numbering of the Catalogue, keeping first to the right along the building materials aisle, and round the walls of the Gallery before entering the front door of model house in centre. The back door of the house is for EXIT ONLY. The expenses of this Exhibition have been exceptionally heavy, owing to the amount of structural work necessary. Visitors are asked to place Contributions in the boxes, or to send subscriptions or donations to the Secretary, Mr. C. Campbell Ross, at the Gallery. Some of the Exhibits are for sale, a list may be seen on application at the Turnstile. WHITECHAPEL ART GALLERY, HIGH STREET,' WHITECHAPEL. HOUSE AND HOME EXHIBITION, 191 1. PREFACE. At the present time housing and the various problems con- nected with it are among the most pressing questions of the day, and both to the economic and aesthetic sides of these questions new answers must be sought and new solutions found. During the immense increase of industrial activity in the nineteenth century, when Britain made enormous strides as a manufacturing country, and wealth and luxury increased accordingly, there was no corresponding improvement in the housing of the people and the "traditional art 55 that had made almost every English town and village full of the beauty that comes from good proportion and good material rightly used, gave way to the violent negation of all beauty that we now see at every turn in our streets. Traditional art has almost entirely disappeared, and it has been said that the only vestiges of it that appear in our houses are seen in the decorations that good housewives put upon pie-crust or mark with chalk upon their front door steps. It must not be thought that we mean that the old houses were ornamental and the new are not. Anyone who will compare new houses with old, say in Hampstead or Chis- wick, will see that the ugliness of the newer houses consists very largely of the repetition of mechanical ornament. The same holds true of furniture. The ugliness of modern cheap furnishings is not due to their cheapness but to the fact that they attempt to ape the appearance of costly and elaborate articles. 3 There are signs that the worst period is over, and that in the three departments of town development, housing and furnishing, a change for the better has strongly begun. Town planning schemes are being promoted in manv towns, and it is to be hoped that, owing to more seemly arrangements of streets and the diminution of the curse of coal smoke, our towns may cease to be the ugly blotches they now are, and that their inhabitants may be assured of a brighter and healthier existence. Much good work has been done in the replacing of in- sanitary areas by model dwellings. Those built by the London County Council at Millbank and elsewhere show excellent examples of good arrangement and design. In domestic architecture a tendency towards better work may be noticed. In the design of small houses it is being recognised that cheap imitations of Gothic carving are out of place and that good proportion and pleasing materials are all-important, and in furniture, too, a reversion to older and simpler types has begun to be apparent. Yet though there has been much important work done in these ways it is almost as nothing compared with what re- mains to fee done. The intelligent interest that is taken in the improvement of towns, houses, and furniture is almost confined to members of public bodies and of the various professions connected with these matters. The British public has shown in regard to these subjects its usual easy- going tendency to take things as it finds them. It is the object of this exhibition to promote in us an intelligent interest in the material surrounding of our life and an intelligently critical impatience of much of that surrounding, and to show suggestions how it might be im- proved. It should be clearly understood that no claim is made that the arrangements shown are ideal. Ideals exist solely in the mind, and can never be realised, so an " Ideal Home '* exhibition is not possible. Any really authoritative ex- position of the best sorts of houses to live in and the best sorts of furnishings would be a very costly affair, and would involve the invention and making of a very large number of special exhibits, and could only be done adequately by some body with much greater financial resources than are at the disoosal of this Gallery. Separate explanations of the purpose of 'the various parts of the present exhibition will be found further on. The two lower galleries are devoted to the vexed questions of the application of commonsense and good taste to modern housing, and the Upper Gallery shows " Homes of -the Past" by means of bays furnished to show interiors of various periods and by water-colours and photographs. catalogue. LOWER GALLERY. 1 Model of the Garden Suburb of Hellerau, near Dresden Lent by Gartenstadt, Hellerau The garden suburb of Hellerau is situated about 2^ miles from the centre of Dresden. The preliminary work was started in 1906, and building operations in spring, 1909. By October, 1910, about 160 self-contained houses were built and occupied. The area of the land is 350 acres, and it stands about 300 feet higher than Dresden. The prevailing wind is from the west, that is, towards the city rather than from it. This ensures good air. The general plan was made by Professor Riemerschmid, of Munich. The suburb is divided into two portions, one for cottages and one for larger houses. The financial arrangements are such that all speculation is impossible, and all profits over 4 per cent, go to the general good. 2 Garden Vase ' Lent by Messrs. Liberty 3 Combination Range Lent by Messrs. Thos. Elsley, Ltd. 4 " Burkone " Fire and Cast-iron Mantel Lent by The Standard Range & Foundry Co. 5 Cast-iron Fireplace Designed by Longden & Co. Lent by The Carron Company The mantel-pieces in cast-iron and tile on each side of the entrance have been chosen to show that there is no lack of well-designed chimney-pieces at moderate prices on the market at the present time. The fireplace is the most im- portant part of a room. Yet its design has been too often a matter of chance, and unsuitable ornament in iron, wood, and stucco has been almost universal in recent years. But just as there is an improvement now in domestic architecture there are signs that the manufacturers of the present day are willing to meet this by the application of good design tfb the domestic fireplace. 6 Cast-iron Fireplace Designed by Longden & Co. Lent by The Carron Company Lower Gallery 5 7? Tile Fireplace and Wood Mantel Lent by The Well Fire Company 8 Tile Fireplace Lent by Messrs. Bratt, Colbran & Co. 9 Exhibit by The Coal Smoke Abatement Society Lent by The Coal Smoke Abatement Society to Illustrations of Garden Suburb of Hellerau, near Dresden (See Model, No. i) Lent by Gartenstadt, Hellerau ii Garden Vase Lent by Messrs. Liberty i 2 Lithograph Lent by Messrs. Asher 13 Kitchen Range Designed by C. F. A. Voysey Mad? and lent by Messrs. Thos. Elsley, Ltd. 14 Lithograph Lent by Messrs. Asher 15 Garden Vase Lent by Messrs. Liberty 16 Lithograph Lent by Messrs. Asher 17 " Frazzi " Partition Wall with smooth surface Lent by The Frazzi Fireproof Construction Co. 18 Sundial Lent by Messrs. Liberty 19 Three Lithographs Lent by Messrs. Asher Most of us cannot afford original paintings and drawings for our walls, and must be content with reproductions. One of the principles that we' should observe inc the choice of such pictures is that they should be of the same size as the originals, or as nearly so as possible. There is a close connection between what the human hand can do and what delights the human eye. A small reproduction of a large picture, far more minute than the artist could draw, will never be a satisfactory decoration for a wall. It will be certain to require close examination before it can be pro- perly seen, and will be teasing to the eye at the distance from which a picture should be judged as a decorative feature. 6 Lower Gallery It would seem, then, that the most satisfactory cheap pictures will be lithographs drawn for reproduction, or facsimiles of drawings. 20 Garden Posts, Gates, and Chains Lent by The Second Hampstead Tenants, Ltd. Posts and chains, with a low hedge behind, or plain oak fencing, form a much more pleasing fence than the walls of brick with cast-iron above that are so commonly seen. 21 Walling in Brick and Tiles, and Vertical Tiling Lent by Messrs. Thomas Lawrence & Sons (bricks) and The Daneshill Brick & Tile Co. (tiles) As London is in the middle of the best districts for brick earth in Britain, it has been largely built of brick, and will probably continue to be so. Brick is a humbler material than stone, but there is no reason why a brick building should not be a beautiful one. The grand old palaces of Siena in Italy are built of brick, and Hampton Court, na less beautiful, is also of brick. Some fine examples of eighteenth century houses built of brick may be seen in Stepney Green. The ugliness of the brick-built suburbs of London testifies loudly to the misuse of good material. Within the last ten years architects have studied to good purpose tne use of brick in old English houses, and a change for the better has set in. There is at least one suburb of London where beautiful brickwork may be seen — the Hampstead Garden Surburb. It is impossible to demonstrate adequately in this ex- hibition the difference between crudely coloured, badly built brickwork and the "real right thing. 55 Visits of com- parison between the Hampstead Garden Suburb and any neighbouring suburb will be necessary to enforce the lesson, but the contrast between the crudeness of the brickwork built against the blank wall of central house and the mellowness of those on the long wall opposite should be noted. It is hoped that the examples of brickwork here shown will draw attention to this subject and show some- thing of the merits of good brickwork well built. One of the most important things in brickwork is that the colour should be mellow and the surface not too smooth. " Texture 55 is a word much used by architects in regard School of Wrert) 349 Easton Neston (1702-13 (? Wren and) Hawks- moor) 350 Blenheim (1705; Sir John Vanbrugh) 351 Houghton Hall (1722-35; Colin Campbell and Ripley) 352 Castle Howard (1712-1731; Sir John Van-. brugh) 353 Holkham (1725-34; Burlington Kent and Brettingham) 354 Wentworth Woodhouse (1740; Flitcroft) 355 The Vyne, Basingstoke (1750; Chute, an Amateur) 356 Hare wood (1759 ; Carr of York) 357 Series of Photographs from " Old Cottages and Farmhouses in Surrey," by W. G. Davie and W. Curtis Green,/ F.R.I. B. A. Lent by Messrs. Batsford Though rather less elaborate, the general characteristics of the cottages of Surrey are very similar to those of Kent and Sussex. The older ones are almost all built of timber- framing filled in with wattle and plaster or with brick. In many cases the timber-framed walls have been covered with vertical tiling. Houses with walls entirely of brick are generally of later date than those with timber-framed walls. Brick was at first used for chimney stacks only. By the time of Charles II. brick had come into general use for Upper Gallery 4? walls. Very elaborate ornamental brickwork may be seen in houses in Godalming. Roofs were originally covered with thatch or wood shingles ; in almost all cases the original roof-covering has been replaced by tiles. The oldest tiles were not square, but rounded like the scales of a fish. There are many reasons why an old tiled roof looks more picturesque than a new one. The old tiles were all made by hand and were thicker and less even in size than modern ones, and as the old rafters were squared by hand and the laths were of rent oak, the surface on which the tiles were placed was uneven to start with. 358 Spit-jack Lent by Messrs. Shuffrey & Co. 359 Pot -crane Lent by Messrs. Shuffrey & Co. 360 Two Planes (dated 18th cent.) Lent by Mrs. Oswald Barron 361 Imaginary 16th Century Country Inn (model) Made and lent by Charles Wade, Esq., A.R.I.B.A. Very often those who have taste and imagination in design have not skill to do work requiring great neatness of touch, and those who have this neatness lack the power of design. This model shows an exquisite, combination of the imagina- tion in design and neatness in execution. 362 Country House by a River — (a) Plan (b) Elevations (c) Sections and Elevation (d) (e) Perspectives Drawn and lent by Charles Wade, Esq., A.R.I.B.A. Though this £C House by a River 55 is placed here among the old homes, it does not show an old house, cbut is a work of pure imagination wrought by a designer who has intense sympathy with the old cottage architecture of England. " The light that never was on sea or land 55 plays over Mr. Wade's beautiful drawings and though their colour is so pure and bright they create an atmosphere of charmed stillness. The .thanks of the Trustees are due to a large number of people who have helped the Exhibition in various ways. In connection with the Upper Gallery they would specially thank Mr. J. H. Gill for his very valuable help with the furnished bays, Mr. H. Clifford Smith for writing notes, Mr. Lawrence Weaver for planning and arranging the series of photographs lent by " Country Life," and in con- nection with the Lower Gallery, Mrs. Camebus for help with sewing, Mr. Stanley Drew for arranging exhibit No. 81, Miss Gordon for arranging the Stepney Rooms, Mr. L. G. Pearson for planning -the " Flat for a Single Person," Mr. Percy Smith for the frieze of mottoes, Mr. F. W. Walter for (he poster, Mr. C. C. Winmill for designing and superintending the models of house and bedroom in centre of Gallery. .... X D P. & H.,Typ.,Lond. "Srcbttectnral"- Mr. Cecil C, Brewer, Mr. Stanley T, Drew, Mr. Owen Fleming. Mr. T. Alwyn Lloyd, Mr. Geoffrey Lucas, a.r.i.b.a. Mr. Lionel Pearson. Sub-Committee. Prof. Beresford Piti, F.R.I.B.A, Mr. M. EL Baillix Scott, Mr, R. M. Taylor, Mr. H, A. Welch, Mr. C. C, Wxnmill, "Domes of tbe pnst " Sub-Committee, Mr. J, T. Herbert Baily, Mr. E. L. Lutyens, f.r.i.b.a,, Mr. J. H, Gill, f.s.a. Mr. Seymour Lucas, r.a., Mr. Clifford Smith, f.s.a, f.s.a. Mr, Lawrence Weaver, f.s.a., hon. a.r.i.b.a. 44 Jllustratione n Sub-Committee. Mr. Thomas Adams. Prof . Beresford Pite, Mr. Ernest Betham, f.rxb.a. Mr. Brook Kitchen, Mr, Raymond Unwin, F.R.I.B.A. F.R.I.B.A, Miss LUMSDEN, " Domestic JEconomi? " Sub-Committee* Miss ALLON, Mrs. Cox. Miss L. J, Clarke. Mr. Stanley T. Drew. Mr. F. H. Durham. Miss Finlay. Miss C. R. Gordon, Mr. G. Gummer. Mrs. Leon, Miss Mary Leicester, Miss E. A. Meadows. Mrs. Millington. Miss H. J, Plowright. Mrs. Scott, Mr. P. A. Wells. Mr. John Williams. 44 f urnf ture n Sub-Committee* Mrs. Cox. Mr. Stanley T. Drew. Miss Finlay. Mr. Ernest Gimsqn. Mr, G. Gummer. Mr, Ambrose Heal, Mr. P. A. Wells. UPPER GALLERY. LECTURES will be given a.t 8,30 p.m. on ' ^^ily*^ Saturday, June 10, by Lawrence Weaver, Esq., F.S.A. i Subject — " The Architectural Development of the English Home. 5 ' > > Saturday, July 1, by Raymond Unwin, Esq.,F.R.I.B.A. • \ Subject*-'? Town Planning ** (Illustrated). $|fj| TALKS on the "Homes of the Past" by John JK. Gill, Esq., and H. Clifford Smith, Esq., F.S.A. .t \ ' LOWER GALLERY. C , DEMONSTRATIONS IN BASKET MAKING Every Monday and Wednesday at 7.30 p.m., beginning Wednesday, June 7- 1 , : - " Living pictures in the home » (Cooking, Household Work, etc., etc.) ( v , , i y • Will be given by Students or the National ' , < Training School (by the kind permission of -the Principal, Mrs. Charles Clarke), beginning on Thursday, June 1, at 7.30 p.m., and on every sub- , sequent Tuesday and Thursday at 7.30 (except on Thursday, June 22, Coronation Day) during the U « course of the Exhibition. Also by Former Students of the Sni John Cass - v • t . Technical Institute at 7.30 on Friday, June 9, and Friday, June r6. FORTHCOMING EXHIBITIONS. AUTUMN, roil—" OLD LONDON." SPRING, r9i2— " SCOTTISH ART " (including a collection from the Scottish Modern {'tM'- .* • Art Association), ». "f;Vvf^