RAS MALA; OR, HINDOO ANNALS OF THE IPIRONTTlSrOIE OIF GOOZEEAT, IN WESTERN INDIA. BY THE LATE ALEXANDER KINLOCH FORBES, Of the Honorable East India Company's Civil Service. IEW EDITION. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY MAJOR J. W. WATSON, B.S.C., AND A MEMOIR OF THE AUTHOR BY A. K. NAIRNE, ESQ., B.C.S. LONDON: RICHARDSON AND CO., 13, PALL MALL. 1878. - lAii rights SANSKRIT ® I jj 0. Box No. «, U mitn&ndir Lans* INTRODUCTION. Since the Ras Mala was first published, in 1856, there has been an increasing demand for a fresh edition, and it is to satisfy this demand that the present reprint has been put through the press. Though professing to be a mere collection of legends, or garland of chronicles, the Ras Mala is in fact the first and most important epitome of the history of Goozerat hitherto made. It is the work of a profound and accurate scholar, pervaded by a thorough and intelli¬ gent sympathy with the people whose historical phases and domestic life he has in this work so vividly depicted. And though the Author in his original Preface modestly disclaimed for his book all preten¬ sions to a scientific character, the work is in truth eminently scientific, and shows us Goozerat under each of the great dynasties which have swayed her destinies ; and whether under the Wullubhee kings, the Chavadas or Chalookyas of Unhilwara, the renowned Sultans of Goozerat, or the even more famous house of Timur the lame; whether he describes Goozerat under the Guikowar or the Guelphs, we find his pictures not only true but pleasing, not only accurate but interesting. When, too, we consider the vastness of the field of time compre¬ hended in this single volume, stretching as it does from the days of the half-fabulous monarchs of Wullubhee to the middle of the nineteenth century after Christ, it must be conceded that Mr. Forbes has most ably acquitted himself of his interesting task, and it is im¬ possible to say what a debt of gratitude is due from all Goozerat officials to the Author of the Ras Mall He has brought home to is no less Sidh Raj, “the Lion of Victory,” and the politic Koomar Pal, than Ahmed Shah, or the gallant Mahmood Begurra—the one the IV INTRODUCTION. founder of that proud city on the banks of the Sabhermutee, which the Mohummedan historians loved to call the “ ornament of cities,” and the other the conqueror alike of Gurh^ Girnar^ and Powan-gurh Champaner; while, at the same time, he has shown us the Emperor Akbar and Damajee Guikowar, and described the first advent of the British power. It is easiest to picture what the official mind would be without him, by referring to the obsolete opinions held on most important questions of tenure, &c., as shown in the old Revenue Selections ; though indeed we also find there that the lucid intellect of Elphin- stone had already thrown much light upon the subject, and had pre¬ vented grievous injustice being done to large classes of landed pro¬ prietors. Still, even now it is most instructive to read any of the Government selections relating to Goozerat after a careful study of Ras Mala. When, too, it is borne in mind that, excepting the Ras Mala, there is no other work which affords any check to the mass of error that may be found in most of the Government Selections relating to Goo¬ zerat, and when we also remember that not only are these Selections liberally quoted by parties in any ordinary dispute, but often accepted by Government itself, as works laying down dicta from which there can be no appeal, it is easy to picture the benefit conferred by the Ras Mala on Government officials of every class. To give an example of some of these errors I will quote from one of the best SelectionsI refer to that containing Colonel Walker’s reports on the province of Kateewar,—and from that select one of the most interesting reports, viz., that on Soreth. At paragraph 32 Colonel Whlker speaks of Sher Rhan Babi, a scion of one of the noblest Mohummedan families in the province, whose father and grandfather before him had governed large districts, as “ a soldier of fortune.” Lower down, in paragraph 37, we find the following astounding statement, viz., “ Sher Khan did not long survive his establishment “ in Soreth. He was succeeded by his son Salabat Khan, who “ shortly afterwards retired to Goozerat, and left his son Bahadoor INTRODUCTION. V “ Khan at Joonagadh in possession of the Government.” The reader will probably be surprised to hear that Sher Khan long survived his establishment in Soreth; that so far from his being succeeded by his son Salabat Khan, Salabat Khan was his (Sher Khan’s) father, and that Bahadoor Khan so far from being his grandson, was Sher Khan himself, Bahadoor Khan being the style assumed by Sher Khan after becoming independent at Joonagurh. And so again in paragraph 49 “Salabat Khan bequeathed to his “ sons Dillut Khan and Zeman Khan, who were junior to Bahadoor “ Khan, the district of Bantwa.” The truth being that Bantwa never belonged to Salabat Khan, and that Diler Khan and Sher Zaman Khan (not Dillut Khan and Zeman Khan) succeeded their father in his jagir of Gogha, but were thence expelled by Sohrab Khan, who afterwards, through the influence of Burhan-ool-Moolk at the court of Delhi, obtained not only the jagirdari of Gogha from the Babis, but also the Naib-Foujdari of Soreth ; and it was when exercising these latter functions that he granted Bantwa in jagir to Diler Khan and Sher Zaman Khan, as he saw the imprudence of alienating this in¬ fluential family. Now the Ras Mala is almost always accurate, and even where possibly better versions of historical facts may be offered than those accepted by Mr. Forbes, it will invariably be found that he had the best authority then available for his statements. The researches of Dr. Biihler 1 show that the four kings of the name of Sheeladitya, mentioned at page 16 of the Ras Mala, may be increased to five. Dr. Biihler gives the date of this fifth monarch as St. 441 of the at present unknown era, and this prolongation of the rule of theWullubhee line may perhaps eventually show that the Mlechh destroyers of this renowned city were some of the earlier Musalman invaders; even though the name of another king be not discovered, and added to those of the eighteen of the line at present known. With regard to the Solunkhee kings of Unhilwara, Dr. Buhler’s researches have (see his “ eleven land grants of the- Chaulukyas of 1 Indian Antiquary, part Ixiii., for January, 1877. INTRODUCTION. “ Unhilw&d ”) shown us cause to believe that the story of Mool Rij’s arrival at Samunt Singh’s court, as given by Mr. Forbes, on the authority of the Prubundh Chintamunee, is a fabrication cf the chroniclers and bards, and that in reality Mool Raj conquered the Sarasvatimandal by force of arms. He gives good reasons why we should consider the Kuleean, where Mool Raj’s father ruled, was. as stated by the chroniclers, in the Kanouj dominions, and that it :s not the Kuleean near Bombay, as supposed by Mr. Forbes (Ras Mala) and by Mr. Elphinstone. He modifies the date ascribed by Mr. Forbes to Bheem Dev I., and adds a new monarch, Tree¬ 'll hoowun Pal (S. 1299), as a twelfth sovereign. Dr. Biihler further shows that the dismemberment of the Unhilwara kingdom and the establishment of an independent principality by Luwun Prusad, the Waghela chieftain of Dholka, took place during the reign of Bheem Dev II. Luwun Prusad was succeeded by his son Veer Dhuwul, and Dr. Biihler shows that Veesul Dev, Veer Dhuwul’s successor, displaced Treehoowun Pal on the throne of Unhilwara, probably by force of arms. It would seem from local tradition in Goozerat that Veesul Dev made Dubhoee his capital previous to the conquest of Unhilwara Puttun, and it is probable that any inscriptions found at Dubhoee may elucidate this point. The Waghelas, who derived their name from the township of Waghel, in North Goozerat (now under Radhanpoor), were the most renowned branch of the Solunkhees in Goozerat, and a local poem celebrating the nine branches of the Solunkhees commences, “ The greatest branch is that of Waghel; “ consider them most excellent Solunkhees.” Dr. Biihler, at page 5 of his pamphlet on the Chalookyas of Unhilwara, points out that the reason of the information given in the Ras Mala being scanty is that Somesvara’s * Kirtikaumudi, ” Rajase- khara’s “ Prabandh Kosha,” and Harshagani’s “ Vastoopalacharitra ” were not available when Mr. Forbes wrote. There are of course inaccuracies in dates in cases where legends are faithfully copied, for all legends are notoriously untrustworthy in such matters. A curious instance occurs in the account of the Gohil clan, where Ranjee Gohil, the father, is represented as expelled from INTRODUCTION. vii Ranpoor by Mahmood Begurra while Mokherajee, Gohil, the son, is slain in battle fighting with the Emperor Mohummed Toghluk, their respective dates being, Mahmood Begurra a.d. 1459 to 1511, and Mohummed Togluk a.d. 1323 to 1351; but I can also bear witness that the original legend contains precisely this anachronism. Though the rule of the imperial viceroys under the house of Timur is but briefly noticed, it could hardly be expected that so long a period could be introduced in a single volume, nevertheless the concluding days of the imperial rule and the gradual assumption of the paramount sway by, first the Mahrattas and then the British, is graphically described. Imbued as he was with a thorough admiration for the Rajpoot races, we can hardly expect Mr. Forbes to be quite fair to the Mahrattas; but it is only just to say that his predecessors, Colonel Walker and others, are equally, if not more prejudiced against them; and even so late as 1842, I find so high an authority as Sir G. Le Grand Jacob speaking in an official report of “ the customary Mahratta process of deglutition.” It is, however, but fair to the Mahrattas to point out that when they entered Goozerat they were hailed as deliverers from the Mogul yoke, and to show that the decay of the imperial power was caused more by the general disaffection of the Hindoo chieftains, the impatience of the predatory tribes, whose license of plunder had been sternly checked, and the efforts towards independence of the imperial servants, than it ever was by the Mahratta incursions, which, without connivance, would have been impossible. The Mahrattas, indeed, in Goozerat almost immediately aimed at territorial acquisition, and the establishment of Peelajee Guikowar at Songurh was speedily followed by a secret treaty with Rajpeepla for an unobstructed passage through his territory, and an unhindered cross¬ ing of the Nerbudda at Baba Piarah’s ford. Owing to this connivance with the Guikowar, the chieftain of Rajpeepla was afterwards enabled to reconquer his ancient capital of Nandod and absorb the whole of the Nandod Sarkar. It was owing to the Mahrattas that Eedur was able to expel its Mohummedan garrison, and that the tributary Sarkar of Nowanugger, in the peninsula, which had been made Khalsa by vm INTRODUCTION. Aurangzeb, was able again to resume its tributary relations. By Mahratta sufferance the Thakoris were undisturbed in their jagirs of Pahlunpoor and Devee (Deesa), and, but for Mahratta moderation, neither would Sher Khan Babi and his descendants have been allowed to absorb the imperial district of Soreth, nor would many other of the local chieftains of the peninsula have been able to enlarge their petty holdings into extensive principalities by wholesale absorption of the imperial domain. One of the reasons why this absorption was so easy was this : in latter times, as the imperial hold on the province grew more slack, it was customary to farm out the villages for a fixed sum (jama), and, as in the case of the peninsula, the farmers were almost invariably the local landholders, nothing was easier than to retain a hold over the villages so farmed when the power of collecting the jama was gone. In almost every case the Mahrattas were very moderate in their demands, and, indeed, until the time of Shivram Gardee and Babajee Appajee, the latter of whom was strengthened by the countenance of the English, not only were the amounts of tribute levied in the peninsula enforced with the greatest irregularity, but the actual sums taken were insignificant in amount; and if we are to believe the Tarikh-i-Soreth, so late as a.d. 1803-4 Babajee himself had to refund two-thirds of the amount of tribute levied, owing to the pressure exerted by the armies of the Joonagurh Dewan. Mr. Forbes notices that the Moolukgeeree circuits of the Mahrattas were merely copied from their Mogul predecessors, from whose official nomenclature not only the term Moolukgeeree, but also most of the official titles and technical revenue terms, etc., in Goozerat are borrowed. Nor is it merely in historical detail that Mr. Forbes’s volumes are instructive. About one fourth of the volume is devoted to an account of the customs of the different classes of natives; their religious services, marriages, funerals are specially dealt with, together with their ideas regarding Bhoots, and other popular beliefs, and a very able and elaborate account of the Rajpoot land tenures under the Mohummedans, the Mahrattas, and the British is also furnished. INTRODUCTION. IX No t only has the general scheme of the government of this im- portaint province and the history of the governing dynasties been ac¬ curately and faithfully pourtrayed, but together with this we have his¬ tories of the principal Rajpoot houses, who then, as now, were among the principal nobles of the empire; and we are thus enabled to form a more thorough conception of the times depicted, as we read of the subject from the view both of the rulers and the governed. There are but few other books of reference about Goozerat, and none