■^x*ga£4 ’ 'mrnks ms pi KNR Ulrich Middeldorf Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 https://archive.org/details/accountofseriesoOObarr A N ACCOUNT of a S E,R I E S of PICTURES, IN T H F GREAT ROOM OF THE Society of Arts, Manufactures, and Commerce, AT THE A DELPHI . By' J A M E S BARRY, R. A. Profeflbr of Painting to the Royal Academy, Laudandaque velle, fit fails. L O N D 0 N : ' Printed for the AUTHOR, By William Adlard, Printer to the Society; And fold by T. Cadeli, in the Strand j and J, Walter, Charing Crofs. m DCC lx x X III, A it-/ ♦ * I ( 3 ) TO THE KING. I Moft humbly beg leave to lay at your Majefty’s feet, the following account of a feries of Pidures, on the fubjed: of human culture. I have endeavoured to execute thofe Pictures as a rejoinder and aid to the rea- foning, in behalf of your Majefty’s peo- ple of thefe iflands, that I have urged in my inquiry into the real and imaginary obftrudions to our acquifition of the arts, which, as a poor teftimony of humble duty, and with great humility, was laid at your Majefty’s feet in 17 74. That your Majefty, who is the equal and affectionately tender father of all his people, may long continue to derive fa- A 2 tisfodio^ ( 4 ) lisfadtion from the Arts, and that theft Arts may continue to merit your Ma- jefty's moft gracious and neceffary protec- tion, is the humble, though earned: prayer. May it pleafe your Majefty, Of your Majefty’s Moft dutiful fervant. And moft faithful fubjedt, JAMES BARRY, INTR 0~ ( 5 ) INTRODUCTION. S OME few years fince, when I was at Rome, Abbe Winckleman, the pope’s antiquary, published a hiitory of the art, which gave great offence to many of our people, as it contained very fevere reflec- tions upon the character of the Englifh, charging them with the want of capacity and genius to fucceed in the fuperior ex- ertions of the arts of painting, &c. and that their continued practice demonstrated that they were fitted for nothing greater than portraits, and other low matters, from whence no honour could be derived either to the artift or the country. Abbe Winckleman having in this matter only gleaned after Abbe du Bos, and the pre- sident Monteiquieu, thefe injurious opi- nions were become the common creed of the greateft part of the dilletanti and pre- A 3 tenders ( 6 ) tenders to picture knowledge. But a t- the principle upon which this fyftem pro- ceeded was founded in error, and occa- fioned by the ignorance of thofe gentle- men, of the nature of the art itfelf, and of the mode and procefs of its growth and corruption $ it appeared to me, that the felting of thefe matters in their true point of light, would be an undertaking not unbecoming an artift, and from whence fome little credit might be derived, I was ready enough to flatter myfelf, that the doing of this had been fortunately re- fer ved for me ^ and accordingly, foon after my return from Italy, I took the liberty of humbly prefenting his Ma- jefty (as the firfl: fruits of his academy)* with my inquiry into the real and imagi- nary obftruCtions to the acquifition of the arts in England, which was very imper- fectly publifhed by Becket, in 1774; and it has been not a little flattering to me lince, to find the objeCt of it admitted as true and indubitable, by thofe who (land m ( 7 ) In the higheft eftimation with the public* for judgment, knowledge, and candoun But the mod fatisfadtory proof of all was yet wanting, I mean the adhtai production of fome great work of hif- torical painting. This was little likely to happen, not fo much from any in- furmountable difficulty in the under- taking itfelf, as from the fervile, trifling views of the public, the particular pa- trons, or more properly the employers of the artifts, who from caufes, which have been largely explained in the in- quiry above mentioned, were intent upon nothing but the trifling particu- lars of familiar life, wafting the whole time, vigour, and pradtice of our artifts in fuch a manner as made genius and high information quite ufelefs, and daily rendered the few, who from nature and ftudy were at all qualified, but the more and more unfit to reach that ftand- ard, by which alone we could be entitled to vie with the great performances of Italy, France, &c. A 4 The ( 8 )' The difficulty of fubfffiing by any other fpecies of art, than that of por- trait painting, the mean counfel of pa- rents and friends, under the miftaken notion of prudence, and the love of eafe and affluence, had fo operated upon our youth, that the country has been filled with this fpecies of artifls. When men fuffer themfeives to be forced away from their own views of obtaining an honed: fame, by advancing their art, by adding new energies to it, by attempts to unite it more clofely with the utility and improve- ment of mankind, in manners, i$ un- demanding, in private and in public vir- tue : when men are prevailed with to relin- quifh thefe, it may well be imagined that fome few may be found capable of running even into their very oppofites, into what is not only mercenary and fordid, but alfo vicious, every thing that is mean in art, and ilill meaner in morals, may then naturally be expected • their houfes (ffiame upon them) will become conve- nient,. ( 9 ) ment, and for other purpofes. - — To' which thofe of painting portraits, ferve but as a blind— '-But at beft few other ends can be anfwered, than acquiring a fubfiftence or a fortune, by complying with the narrow views of others, and the multiplying trifling but profitable parti- culars, which, as we have feen, has no other effedt as to the reputation of the country, than to fully and diminifh it, and to add new and continued force to the farcafms of foreigners, upon our want of capacity for great exertions. Were we to continue multiplying por- traits for a century longer, were we to arrive at ever fo great a degree of me- chanical excellence in this way, it could make no alteration in the opinion of Europe ; we fhould be fall, as we have been, a feoff and a bye-word amoogfl na- tions. Even in the painting of land- fcape, where much more genius and extent of mind can he ihewn, and where fame of our artifts have pofieffed the firft ( 10 ) firft rate abilities ; is it not more thari probable that thefe excellent artifts will not obtain the full credit they deferve, until the curiofity and attention of the world fliall be excited by our fuccef9 in the higher fpecies of art ; when we have fucceedcd in this, we fhall then probably get credit for the inferior de- partments, and not before. The reader will, I hope, not fo far miftake, as to fuppofe me inclined to call the leaft reflection or cenfure upon the practice of painting portraits Amply and fairly taken, far, far from it ; no man values it more than I do when it is confined within its proper channels j like others I feel myfelf inte- refted in the portrait of an anceftor, a parent, a friend, of a benefaCtor to his country or fpecies, of a wife, a great* or a beautiful perfonage ; I am no ftranger to the merit of the fine por- trait of Mr. Abel at his defk, in the aCt of compofingi of Mr. Hone, with his face ( » ) face partly fhaded by his hat ; of a pri- mate walking in the country ; and of feme others which appear now and then, and in great meal are compenfate for the heaps of inconsequential trafh,. or pot- boilers (as they are called) which are ob- truded upon the public-view ; this may be lamented but cannot be helped, as an exhibition mu ft be made up of what the painters are employed about. I am happy alfc to obferve that feme of our portrait painters are r befides their excel- lence in the line of their profeffionp no lefs remarkable for their unfullieci honour and probity ; thefe I very much refpedt, and I hope they will confider themfelves as entirely out of the ques- tion, when I take the liberty to obferve in general,, that from our too eager atten- tion to the trade of portraits, the pub- lic tafte for the arts has been much depraved,, and the mind of the artiffc often fhamefully debafed, and yet the fele painting of thefe portraits, compa- ratively ( 12 ) ratively contemptible as it has appeared to people of elevated minds, to foreigners* and indeed to all, who are not ac- quainted with, and interefled in the ori- ginals, is notwithstanding the means amongft us,, (as the ingenious Webb and others have obferved) by which is obtained a fafflion, a fortune, and upon true commercial ideas, a rank and con- fequence, as the bufinefs and refort of the fhop ; and the annual profits of it are the only efti mates which generally come under confideration. Here then is a fituation ftrongly tempting a fhewy man, to proceed a flep farther, at obtain- ing a more univerfal admiration, if it can be obtained by mean hypocrify, and all the difingenuous refources and quackeries which mufl neceffarily, and as he may think will probably, fupport an artificial confequence thus founded upon the un- liable bafis of folly and vanity. After all this affluence which may arife from the vogue for making portraits, is the whole of ( J 3 ) of what it will naturally produce * this, as was before hinted, may by little ne- ceffary arts and induftrious puffing, be made to fill up for the moment the little minds of the though tlefs rabble, whe- ther of the polite or vulgar fort, or both, and will even help to confound matters Hill further, and give our names a confe- quence with fome of thofe difpenfers of fame, the book-makers ; who, however knowing in -what they may have really iiudied, can, with a very few exceptions, hardly be coniidered for their knowledge of the arts as in any thing differing from the mere herd : but with thofe who are really intelligent in the arts, all this ex- terior and eclat of appearance will be laughed at, and can avail no more as to the matter of reputation, than the fuc- eeeding in any other fafhionable manu- fadure, where genius and high ability can have had no concern. This kind of work is indeed made with paint, &c. fnread upon wood or canvafs* and ( H ) and fo far vrc can account for the miifake of many of our fhort-fighted literati 5 but 30 all the higher refpedts, it comes as far Abort of the art of Rafaelle, and the other great hiflorical painters, as Homer and Milton are from little occasional verfify- ers; or Hippocrates, Harvey and Boerhaave, from dentifts and corn cutters. This then is the mefs of pottage for which thefe Efaus fell their birth-right; and the lofs is furely more than the gain in Such a barter, where the natural paffion for well-deferved glory is meanly facri- iiced to a facticious tbirft of lucre and vanity, with which it is impoffible for the mind to be fatisfied. Thus at jar with the very end and deftination of his faculties, a man's nobler appetites will become his continual accufers, unavoid- ably actuated by envy, and all the bafer paffions, worfe (if we believe that great mailer of life and manners, Horace) than any torments ever devifed by the Sicilian tyrants^ jxis only refource will be in the tern- ( ) temporary artifices, his cunning may de~ yife for the fuppreffion of his rivals, at the expence of the little that may remain of virtue and integrity j and in this, whe- ther he fucceeds or not, he will, in the end, but give the finifhing blow to his own quiet. A man, in inch a wretched fituation, (for wretched it undoubtedly mu it be, notwithftanding all difguifes and appear- ances) would naturally have more of my pity than cenfure, were it not for the great mifchiefs he is fo me times inclined, and often enabled to perpetrate, in ob- ftrudting thepurfuits of genuine legitimate art; a great deal might be ufefully faid on this fubje£t 3 however, for the prefent, I fhall content myfelf with obferving (and it may have its ufe with the rifiog genera- tion of artifts) that lefs pains and trou- ble than is neceffary to fupport debafed art, and a falfe confequence, would, if differently directed, have enfured to them |he real unfading glories of their profef T lion. ( i6 ) lion, together with what is much more valuable* the additional ferenities of a quiet ua wounded confcience. However, the mifchief that may be done' in this way will be of (hort duration, when the real artift: will recoiled, that he is bound in duty, both to God and his coun- try, to make head againft all fraud and wrong, whatever it may coft him ; our duty is eafily feen, and ought to be, if not joyfully accepted, at leaf!: refpedfully fubmitted to ; whether we are martyrs or conquerors, can be no part of our con- cern, as it does not depend upon us ; for the ends of Providence are anfwered fome- times one way, and fometimes the other* Happy thofe whole fphere of adi.on ena- bles them to purfue this line of duty in great matters : but even, they are not in- glorious who ad worthily in the inferior, and more con traded filiations that God has alloted to them. Every man then, in this warfare of life, arts, &c. is either foldier or general, and muft not timidly defert ( l 7 ) defert his poft, and leave the field in pdf- fefiion of his bafe antagonifts, as was unfortunately the cafe of poor Mr. Hufley ; if he had previoufly taken care to leave (if poflible) fome monument of general manifeftation behind him, the arts would not be upon the footing they are at this day, and thofe who came after him would have had fewer difficulties to ftruggle with. It may be thought by fome, that it is giving too much confequencc to wretched cabals and mifreprefentations, to fuppofe that they could have been fo very efifec~ tual in obftrudting the progrefs of fupe- rior art, and that there is nothing fo very uncommon and peculiar in this matter : as malice, envy, and every kind of bafe attack, have ever conftantly followed great undertakings in all ages of the world, and in every art, and yet have never been able to hurt the credit of either ; that all the fcurrilous attacks, criticifms, and cabals of the fcribblers of the laft age, which gave oecafion to the / B writing 4 / ( *8 ) writing of the Dunciad, and which are fo elegantly lamented in that beautiful little poem printed in the notes 0) could neither prevent Pope from writing, or people of good tafte and good fenfe, from reading and admiring what he had written. But thefe cafes are' in one refpedt very materially different ; for the poffeflbrs of poetical or other literary abilities, are fo far happily circumftanced, that if the means of fubfiftence be once fecured, they can have few or no obflrudlions to prevent the exertion of their talents, compared with thofe that lie in the way of other arts. Rafaelle, M. Angelo, and Carrache, could not have produced their great works, without the Sifline Chapel, the Vatican, and the Farnefe Pallaces : whereas Milton's poem required neither a palace nor a prince, and is as much within the purchafe of the mechanic, as of the fovereign. A great effort of hif- (a) While malice. Pope, denies thy page. torical ( i9 ) torlcal painting, which requires a church or a palace to place it in, and can have but a Angle proprietor, upon whom the whole expence muft fall, is likely to meet with many obftrudtions, to which poems and other literary productions of eafy purchafe are not liable; and notwithftanding that an attention to the beauties of poetry and literature, makes part of every man's edu- cation in this country, yet, if we ihould for a moment fuppofe that a poem was like a pidture, unique, and to be con- fined to the poffeflion of fome one great employer or purchafer, it is very much to be doubted, whether brigue and cabal would not in that cafe have been much more effectual in preventing the great from becoming either employers or pur- chafers ; and whether many excellent productions would not have been fuffo- c^ted in their birth, from which the country at this day derives no fmall re- putation. How much more fatal muft this be in painting, which has the addi~ B 2 tional ( 20 ) tional diiadvantage of being of recent in- trodudion, as yet hardly naturalized, and confequently not fo generally ftudied and undefftood. When therefore we reded:, that in the number of thofe who apply to the arts, many muft unavoidably fail of fuccefs ? from the want of natural parts and ge- nius; many more from the want of edu- cation and proper culture ; many others loft in fordid purfuits, in pleafure, indo- lence, &c. there can remain but a few indeed likely to think of ftruggling with the difficulties of elevated art : of this few, feme wait in vain for patrons, who, theugh not always neceffary to thofe who will employ themfelves in mean and or- dinary things, are yet greatly wanting for the furtherance of fuperior views j a very little would do a great deal in this way ; and it is to be hoped, that patro- nage and honourable countenance will not be always flung away without benefit to art, : or credit to either the, country or the ( 21 ) the donor. But this, added to the other reafons that have been enumerated, will iufficientiy account why fo little has been hitherto done in fuperior art. With refped: to hiftorical painting, people will not now give us credit for common-place matter, of which, for a century pad, there has been more than enough all over Europe ; many fubjedts have been long fince exhaufted, by the accumulated ingenuity and induftry of our predeceffors on the Continent. Ar- tifts of no compafs of mind, or genius, are notwithftanding neceffitated to fall into this beaten track, and will content themfelves, as Sterne happily expreffes it, with pouring the fame water from one veffel to another, and think they do fomething when they change particulars, this way or that, from fitting to Handing^ &c. when they alter or add to the mere material, without adding to the fuhjedh But if Carlo Vanloc, Carlo Marratti, Cigniani, Cigoli, &c. had done nothing B 3 more ( 22 ) more original than the painting of nati- vities, with the light coming from the child, the affection of the mother, fim- plicity of the Ihepherds, the angels, Jo~ feph, the liable, the ox, the lamb, &c. we ihould have given the praife to Anto- nio Corregio, to whom all this belongs, without paying much regard to the paltry alterations or additions of his barren imi- tators. There are many fubjedls of the Ne w Teftament, which have been already fo hackneyed, that a moment’s infpedtion will convince us, that there is hardly any thing admiffable into them, that has not been executed over and over again ; and, confeq ently, prints and drawings of them within every man’s reach ; fo that for the fame reafon that mere mechanical artifts will run after thefe kind of fubjedls, a Pouffin, a Le Sueur, and all who poffefs a mind and genius adequate to their art, would wifh to avoid them. The Cruci- fixion, though a fubjedl often painted, yet, in the hands of a Pouffin, it acquires an ( 23 ) an important novelty in tile riling of the Ghofts, the darknefs, &c. this, however, is not always practicable ; and where it is not, fuch fubjeCts will naturally be thrown afide by a great man, as barren and unproductive. It is not by evading the difficulties of the art, by furbiihing: up old inventions, or by putting figures together without any invention at all, that we can rival the great works ; if picture knowledge is new in England, it will not be always fio ; we ought not to build too confidently on the ignorance of the pub- lic, or on the clatter of intrigue and faffiion ; the one is not very durable, and the other reaches but a fhort way. The Majefty of Hiftorical Art requires not only novelty, but a novelty full of com- prehenfion and importance. The higher exertions of Art, as in Rafaelle, &c. require, for the devellop- ing of all their beauties, not only fome degree of information in the fpeClator, but alfo that he confiders them with B 4 forme / ( 24 ) iome attention and ftudy $ and thefe artifts were particularly happy in this re- fpedt, as there were a great many people, both in Italy and France, with much leifure and eafe of mind, who paiticularly delighted in thefe ftudies, nd who, by their ingenious explanations, were a kind of ufeful and very agreeable medium be- tween the artifts and the public. It is an abfurdity to fuppofe, as fome mechanical artifts do, that the Art ought to be fo trite, fo brought down to the underftand- ing of the vulgar, that they who run may read : when the Art is folely levelled to the immediate comprehenfton of the ignorant, the intelligent can find no- thing in it, and there will be nothing to improve or to reward the attention even of the ignorant themfelves, upon a fecond or third view j fo much for what was wanting in Hiftorical Art. As I had been bred up in this way, had every advantage of ftudy, and time before me, I thought myfelf bound in duty { 25 } duty to the country, to the art, and to my own character, to endeavour at fup- plying this deficiency of a public work of hifiorical art, and to try whether my abilities would enable me" to exhibit the proof, as well as the argument. Accordingly, in July 1777, I began the work here exhibited ; and although I was without patron, fortune, or en- couragement, without wages to fubfift on, and with no other affiftance to carry it on, than what I was to derive from any other occafional works that might fall in my way ^ with only thefe to rely on, and with a clear forefight of the many vexa- tious delays, and difficulties that would naturally happen, as well as of the un- derhand malevolent attentions from a cer- tain quarter, which had continually fol- lowed me, and which I well knew would not be wanting induflrioufly to embroil and embitter matters on this occafion ; yet I have to thank God for it, that in the maim ( 26 ) mam the work went on pleafantly enough, and would have been long fince finifhed, could I have given my whole time to it; however, another year will compleat all I mean to do; but as it is now happily brought fo near it’s conclufion, and that the fubjedk and fcope of the whole may be feen and confidered, I wilhed much, in a work of fuch extent, to adopt the old Greek practice, and whilft it was yet in a ftate of being improved and amended, to avail myfelf of the opinion of the can- did and well-informed part of the pub- lic, before it received the lafl: hand s a genuine unbiafled opinion is always worth fomething ; even the cobler may be of ufe in what appertains to his iaft. As in general, the judgment we form on old works of art, is from the number and weight of their excellencies, whereas in the modern, we only take into confide- ration what may be faulty and defective; there is no doubt but many faults and defers will be found in what I have done. ( 2 7 ) done, forne of them are owing to my want of jfkill to do better, others to want of knowledge in the objector, and feme times perhaps to his want of candour ; others will of courfe be remedied in finifhing the work , there are others alfo, which $re fairly chargeable upon the difficulties, interruptions, and ftraightened circumfcan- ces with which I had to wreflie in carry- ing it on, at the times I could give up to it, being obliged to ftrike much off at a heat, without being able afterwards to indulge myfeif much in fecond thoughts ; however, fome effential advantages are alfo derived from this very cbcumiiance j and let me be permitted to add, that I have a fatisfadtion in believing, that whatever opinion might be entertained, as to the merit of my work, my induffry and laborious perfeveraace will not be, overlooked ^ particularly when it feall be remembered, that mod rr. would have done nothing in fuch a lit nation, un- patronized, with few friends X could ferve ( 28 ) ferve me, and powerfully and artfully oppofed 5 indeed (to ufe a phrafe facred among fchool boys) I have not had fair play, and hold myfelf in many refpedts to be as yet untried, as the difficulties of the art was the leaf!: part of what I had to encounter. Such then as the work is, my intention was to try how much Ikill and ability, under all thofe difadvantages, I might be able to produce in an extent- five fubjedt, not very diffimilar to that of Rafaelle's, in the Vatican; the experi- ment can do me no diffionour, and I fhall at leaft have the credit of preparing the way, and calling out to this talk, fome man of more genius and better fortune than myfelf It will be found upon trial, that this bow is not for every one to fhoot with ; but whenever the man fhall arrive, who from intenfe and vigorous application, is fundamentally fldlled in the various parts of this very extenfive art, poffe fling alfo the additional advan- tages of a cultivated and capacious mind. en- ( 2 9 ) enriched with thofe treafuries from the Superior Sciences, that alone can invigorate, and give an extenfion and value to the art ; if further, he fhould from modera- tion, felf-denial, and eftrangement, from the weaknefs, vanities, and impertinence of life, be enabled to employ his whole time and attention in this way, every- thing will be poffible to him. Such an union of qualities is indeed very rarely to be met with, but when it is, I hope, or if that be too much, at lead: I fhall fincerely grieve, if the neceflary means,, „ and the opportunity of exertion fball be witheld from him. Every body knows that Rafaelle en- joyed all the advantages the heart of man could wifh for, and had a fair opportu- nity of putting forth all his ftrengtb, in a country which afforded a continual oc- eafion for the exercife of his abilities ^ his profeffion was considered as not lefs neceffary than ornamental, and hi.s great work of the Camera della Senatura , was carried ( 33 ) carried on under the aufpices of thofe two great and diftinguifhed encouragers of the art, Julius the Second, and Leo the Tenth ; he was affifted in this work by the counfels (fuch as they were) of the great luminaries of that age, Bembo, Caftilione, Bibiena, &c. It confifts of four great pictures reprefenting Theology, 01 the Difpute of the Sacramen t ; Philofo- phy, or the School of Athens ; Jurif- prudence, an Allegorical Picture ; and Mount Parnaffus, or Poetry. It is a poor ambition that could content itfelf in the Eighteenth century, with merely avoiding the many faults and errors that learned and knowing men have pointed out in thofe pictures of Pvafaelle’s ; it would be more for the honour of a mo- dern, to endeavour at equalling or out- doing him in thofe great particulars where he is moft excellent, and that this is not only poffible but practicable, is evident from the antique ftatues which are many degrees beyond Rafaelle, in the ( 3 1 ) the mo ft eflential of thofe very particu- lars in which he liimfelf excelled. The antique ftatues are of a more exalted fpe- cies of character, they have much more beauty, much more of fublimity, and are much more correct. Even in the detail of thofe Pictures of Rafaelle, in the heads, arms, legs, and all the compo- nent parts of his figures, though they are executed with refpedtable ability, yet alfo in thefe parts he is confeffedly in- ferior to the Antique, to the Laocoon, the Gladiator, the Apollo, the Venus, &c. the detail of Rafaelle’s figures can- not even in juftice be preferred to what we often find in Carrache and Domeni- chino ; though thefe great Artifts are by no means to be compared with him in the higher excellencies. The principal merit of Painting as well as of Poetry, is its addrefs to the mind ; here it is that thofe Arts are fillers, the fable or fubjedt, both of the one and the other, being but a vehicle in which are ( 32 ) are conveyed thofe fentiments by which the mind is elevated, the underftanding improved, and the heart foftened. It is in this addrefs to the mind, in the fub- limity, elegance and propriety of the ideas, and in the wife and judicious fe- leCtion of fublime, elegant and happily correfponding forms in the perfonages, characters, exprefiions, &c. that the Ro- man fchool has been acknowledged fupe- rior, not alone to the Hollanders and Flemings, but to the other fchools of Italy alfo; and it is in thefe that Rafaelle is juftly diftingu idled as the foremoft man in the Roman fchool. In forming a proper judgment how nearly any modern work has approached this exalted ftaiidard of Grecian perfec- tion, or rather how much a modern work may come fhort of the degree of this Grecian excellence, to which Rafaelle had arrived, it were to be wifhed they could be feen together ; but this not being always poffible, there remains no other ( 33 ) other method of fair and impartial proce- dure, but to examine, under the fame view, fuch dfential particulars as we can bring together, and many we can ; for in- fiance we may examine them with re- fpedt to the fubjedts, we may compare them as to their dignity, utility, the de- gree of learning, capacioufnefs of mind* force of genius, and knowledge of life and manners, employed in telling their feveral flories. Marc Antonio's print of the Parnaflus, or Aquilla's, will fuffici- ently inform us what Rafaelle has done there; his view of Heaven, in the difpute of the Sacrament, and his School of Athens, of which there is a copy at Nor- thumberland houfe, and the prints of it in every one's poffeffion, where at leaft his flock of ideas, and manner of order- ing the fubjedts, may be feen and confi- dered, as well as in the pictures them- felves. By thus comparing any new work with whatever had been done before i t, we may have a clear view of its compara- C tive ( 34 ) five merits, or demerits : but if we fhall judge of it without reference to any work in aCtual exigence, and fhall mea- fure it by no other ftandard, than fuch notions and expectations as men may per- haps faftidioufly entertain of the mere poffibilities of performance, there will be no likelihood of its giving much fa- tisfaCtion. As to what might be expeCted from the remarks and criticifms of artifts, their opi- nions being generally conformable to their own practice, they will no doubt approve or cenfure in proportion as any work is like or unlike their own. The learned Abbe du Eos has fome reflections on the conduCt of artifts in this matter, which appear to me to extend too gene- rally. Painters are like other men, fome more fubjeCt to envy than others ; he fee ms to have forgotten that men may poffefs different kinds of excellence in the fame art, and confequently can have no ground for envy ; and there are, I ihould ( 35 ) Ihould hope, thofe who are fuperlor to this bafe paffion, whether there was any ground for it or not. However, as his poffible the learned Abbe may be in the right, and as his reflections are curious, and worthy the reader’s attention, it may perhaps not be amifs to infert them here. te New performances are approved at but without wifdom and /kill, to pre- vent frequent retaliation on themfeives* and their more feeble offspring. At fome diftanee on the other fide of a river, is a woman milking a goat, and two children fitting in the entrance of their habitation, a cave, where they are but poorly fenced againft a lion, who difco« vers them as he is prowling about for prey ; a little farther in the diftanee, are two horfes, one run down by a tyger, by by which I wifhed to point out, that the want of human culture is an evil which extends (even beyond our own fpecies) to all thofe animals which were intended for domeftication, and which have no other defence but in the wifdom and in- duftry of man. In the woman with the dead fawn over her fhoulder, and leaning on her male companion, I wifhed to glance at a matter often obferved by tra= vellers, which is, that the value and efti- mation of women encreafes according to the C 46 ) the growth and cultivation of fociety and that.amongft favage nations, they are In a condition little better than beafts of burthen, all offices of fatigue and labour, every thing, war and hunting excepted, being generally referved for them. As Orpheus taught the ufe of letters, the theogony or generation of the gods, and the worfhip that was due to them, I have placed before him papers, the mundane egg, &c. a lamb bound, a fire kindled, and other materials of facrifice, to which his fong may be fuppofed pre- paratory : confiderably behind, in the extreme diftance, appears Ceres, as juft lighting on the world. Thefe circum- ftances lead us into the fecond Pidture, which confift of fome of the religious rites eftabliffied by thofe dodtrinal fongs of Orpheus, • The Second /' ( 47 ) Second PICTURE. A Grecian Harvejl Home, or Thanks- giving to the Rural Deities Ceres, Bacchus, &c. J N the fore-ground are young men and women, dancing round a double ter- minal figure of Sylvan us and Pan, the former with his lap filled with the fruits of the earth, &c. juft behind them are two oxen with a load of corn, a thresh- ing '.floor, &c. on one fide is juft coming in, the father or maftej of the feaft, with a fillet round his head, a white Staff, or ficeptre, &c. his aged wife, &.c. in the other corner is a bafket of melons, car- rots, cabbage, &c, rakes, plough, &c„ and a group of inferior ruftics drinkings &c. If this part Should be thought lefs amiable, .more disorderly, and mean than the ( 4 § ) the reft, it is what I wifhed to mark.—** In the top of the pidture, Ceres, Bac- chus, Fan, &c. are looking down (fee Georgia, book ift.) with benignity and fatisfadlion, on the innocent feftivity of \ their happy votaries, behind them is a limb of the zodiac, with the iigns of Leo, Virgo, and Libra, which mark this feafon of the year. In the diftance is a farm houfe, binding corn, bees. &c. male and female employ- ments, courtfhip, marriage, and a num- ber of little children every where. In Ihort, I have endeavoured to introduce whatever could beft point out a ftate of happinefs, fimplicity, and fecundity, in which, though not attended with much eclat, yet, perhaps, the duty we owe to God, to our neighbour, and ourfelves, is much better attended to in this, than in any other ftage of our progrefs ; and it is but a ftage of our progrefs, at which we cannot flop, as I have endeavoured to ex- emplify by the groupe of contending figures. ( 49 ) figures, in the middle difiance, where there are men w refiling, one of the look- ers on has a difciis under his arm, &c. on the other fide, the aged men are fitting and lying along, difeourfing and enjoying the view of thofe athletic fports, in which they can nfc longer mix ; and which (as We are informed by the ancients) gave irife to thofe wife and admirable national inftitutions, the Olympian, Iftmian, and Nemean games of the Grecians, which makes the fubjeA of the next pidlure. ( 5 ° ) Third PICTURE* Crowning the Victors at O l ym pi a* THAVE taken that point of time* when the Victors in the feveral games* pafs in proceflion before the hellanodicks or judges* where they are crowned with olive* in the prefence of all the Grecians. The three judges are feated on a throne,* which is ornamented with medallions of their great legifiators, Solon* Lycurgus, &c. under which come trophies of the victories of Salamis, Marathon, and Thermopyle, which are not improper objects of commemoration for fuch a place. As the Greek chronology was regu- lated by thofe games, one of the judges with his hand ftretched out* is declaring the Olympiad, and the name* family, and country THE DIA0ORIDES VICTORS AT OLYMPIA, > '* 'AAA X?. A Jng the keeper, has been lately altered, without the knowledge or confent of the academicians, and what is (till more re- markable, this alteration appears to have been made juft at the time of our coming into the new building, when another printed copy of the inftrument of our in- ftitution and laws, printed by T. Cad-ell, printer to the Royal Academy, 1781, Was handed round amongft us, and where, without any concurrence, participation, or authority, either from our moft gra- pious Head,, or from ourfelves as a Body, there was obtruded on us the following alteration refpedting the keeper : “ There jfhall be a keeper of the Royal Aca- “ demy eledled by ballot from amongft ** the academicians ; he fhall be an artift ** properly qualified to inftrmft the ftu- dents* ( ? 0 $ ) ** dents, See” Here we find thofe words of our law omitted, which point out the diferimination of his qualifica- tions, viz. That he fhall be an able ec painter of hiftory, or a fculp-tor.” J Tis very evident that this alteration was thus clandeftinely fmuggled into the law, in order to remedy, or to fpeak more pro- perly, to conceal the great deficience, inconvenience, and inadequate arrange- ment of our new apartments, (for it would be too much to fuppofe it a blow levelled at the profeffors of fuperior art) fo that we muft now order matters ac- cording to our means ; and although the office requires great abilities, yet as the habitation is not calculated for the ex- ercife of fuch abilities, but for the very reverfe, we muft fupprefs the eflential part of our law, and throw away the place as a iinecure upon inadivity, or upon what is much worfe, upon fome trifler, whofe works and himfelf might be thus crammed into a nutffiell, and whofe con- traded ( io9 ) trailed notions wilLnotwithftanding fettle like a blight on the minds of the ftudents. Thus we fee that from the negledt or in- attention of the nation* our academy has been deferted by fo many of its mo ft re- fpediahle, manly, and independent mem- bers, that thofe who remain may almoft do as they pleafe ; the inftitution is ruin- ing and dwindling into a mere faction of one or two big people* and a few little ones, who, as they are not bound by oath* but by honour, may poffibly pervert every- thing to anfwer the ends of their own plealure, pique, or interefl. Though to remedy thefe evils is not within the power of artifts, yet to the parliament it would be no lefs eafy than it will be ho- nourable ; the reprefentatives of this great nation have nothing further to do, but ftretch forth their parental tendernefs> and give the academy that permanent efla- blifhment that has been ftated above ; this alone would be fufficiently interefting, fo as to produce all the defired union and necefiary ( II® ) fleceflary £0~Operation, that the nature and ends of fuch an eftablifliment could require. But to return to our Want of room in the academy $ there is not even fpace enough to hang up thofe Very excellent drawings from M. Angelo’s laft Judg- ment (by the able and ingenious Mr. Nevay, at Rome), which have been of fo much ufe to the ftudents in the academy; and if any nobleman, or gentleman, wa$ fo public fpirited as to bequeath us any noted picture, by a leader of the good old fchools, where could it be placed, fo as to tempt any other to follow the ex« ample ? There feems no apparent neceflrty why his Majefty’s gracious intentions, and the Very end of the institution, Should be thus defeated by fqueezing up the Academy into a fmall compafs, or that three of the profeflbrs, particularly the profeffor of Painting fhould not be furniihed with apartments there for his refidence and bu« finefs* ( III ) finefs, three rooms, two fmall and one larger of about twenty feet fquare might fufficiently anfwer the purpofe : his lec- tures to the pupils would be more perti- nent and ufeful, and would do the lefs difcredit to the country, the more his ad- vantages of infpeCtion and information were extended by the great mafs of ma- terials that muft necefikrily be brought together under the roof of an Academy. As the very intention of inflituting an Academy can be no other than the bring- ing forward and giving liability, vigour, and perfection to Hiftorical Painting and. Sculpture, to this end it would be highly neceffary (particularly in fuch a country as ours) to contrive a few eafy lituations for artifts of enterprize : this might be eafily and fully effected, by only allowing three rooms each, and of the fame cfinien- lions (as above) to four Hiftorical Painters Academicians, their works would inevita- bly be the better for the materials of ftudy around ( 112 } around them, which no private artift's collection could fupply. All this is yet exceeding practicable, and would be no encreafe of expence worth the mentioning, as the building is ftill carrying on ; the lituation in which it would place -the Academicians would be fufficiently defirable to thofe whofe happinefs confifted in a quiet and conve- nient exercife of their art* all loungers and thofe who might be attracted by the clatter, parade and luxuries of life, would not, could not accept of them. This then is the very identical fituation in which the public would derive the greateft benefit and credit from the labours of the artifts ; they are at the pains of forming, the academicians, being all fworn to vote juftly and confcientioufly (or at leaft ought to be, to prevent partiality and the fhame- ful odious folicitation that is now prac- tifed) and no man being likely to be- come one but the beft grounded and moft formed artift. This inftitution would be to ( i*3 ) to a man devoted to glory * a fheet an- chor, and fecure moorings againd thofe boiderous tempeds of faftion and intrigue* that will inevitably follow the exertions of the artid, whofe abilities are bed: cal- culated to advance the art and the repu- tation of the country ; every thing would foon wear a very different afpedt, our education in the eighteenth century, and the vigour derived from the freedom and admirable frame of our government, would bring the Grecian fpirit back again into the world * our churches* our public halls and great houfes are for the mod part empty or very incongruoufly fupplied * the Society of Arts might* as I obferved before, hold out their Premi- ums to the mod formed Artids, they might make public donations * &nd other focieties, corporations and refpedtable in- dividuals^ would follow their example* H Sixth ( n 4 ) Sixth PICTURE. Elizium , or the State of final Retri- bution. A Lthough it is indifputably true, that it exceeds the higheft reach of hu- man comprehenfion, to form an adequate conception of the nature and degree of that beatitude, which hereafter will be the final reward of virtue $ yet it is alfo true that the arts which depend on the imagi- nation, though fhort and imperfect, may neverthelefs be very innocently and very ufefully employed on this fubjedt, from which the fear of erringoughtnottodeter us from the defire being feryiceable. If what fhall be done be fubfervient to the views of piety and virtue ; if no one be milled into vain or vicious ideas, it will be fuf- ficient. ELYSIUM OH THE ST J T35 OF TlR-AH IRE T JfS ( ) ficient, the error will not be regarded, which is only in the fable or vehicle/ and not in the moral. As in a work of this kind the want of force and ufeful operation on the fpedta- tor, would be a moft effeotial error, fo I have ftudioufly avoided every tendency towards thofe too refined and over fpiri- tualized notions, which would exclude all organs of fenfation, limbs, features, drefs, and indeed all form whatever 5 the bulk of the world will never trouble them- felves with fuch platonic ufelefs niceties, which to them would probably be at- tended with more mi (chief than benefit * for my own part I have preferred the ex- ample of a Virgil, a Fenelon, and a Milton, and think it not only more pic- turefque, but much better and wifer to lay (if I can) a foundation of fublimity and ufeful moral, upon thofe more po- pular opinions, which have been and ever will be infeparably annexed to the ■ various purfuits of adtive life, H 2 In ( 1x6 ) In this concluding picture (which oc- cupies the whole fide of the room, and is of the fame length with that of the Vidors at Olympia, viz* 42 feet each) it was my wifh to bring together in Ely- zium, thofe great and good men of all ages and nations, who were cultivators and benefadors of mankind; it forms a kind of apotfieofis, or more properly a beatification of thofe ufeful qualities which were purfued through the whole work. On one fide this pidure is fepa~ rated from that of the Society,, by palm- trees, a large pedeftal, and a figure of a pelican feeding its young with its own blood, which not unaptly typifies the generous labours of thofe perfonages in the pidure, who had worn themfelves out in the fervice of mankind. On the pedeftal I fhall infcribe a motto, which, with the alteration of a word or two, is taken from the conclufion of the fpeech of Virtue to young Hercules in Zenophon’s Memorabilia. 35 ) Spencer and Chaucer are next. Behind Sappho, who is near Chaucer, witji a pen in her hand, &c. fits the poet Ul- ceus, who was fo much admired by the ancients, though his writings are loft, yet fortunately there is a head of him re- maining, and from the noble and fpirited account Horace gives of his abilities, I have found a companion for him, very much of his own caft in our ancient bard Ofilan, with whom he is talking $ as to the merit of Offian’s poetry, whe- ther it was better or worfe, or of the fame lofty, impetuous, fierce charadter, with that of the Runic and Iflandic bards, is now difficult to determine ; but if we may be allowed to eftimate him by the Fingal, Temora, &c. which the ingeni- ous Mr, Mackpherfon has publifhed in his name, it is certain he would do ho^ nour to any company to which he might introduce him, I agree, however, with the learned and very ingenuous Mr. Shaw, that Oflian, whatever his abilities may J 4 ( ^6 ) have been as a bard* was an Xrifli bard p what he has fo clearly and fo forcibly urged,, from his own knowledge* added to the united teftimony of all the ancient writers of our iflands, from Beda down to Cambden, puts this matter beyond all difpute. I have accordingly given Oflian the Xrifli harp, and the lank black hair, and open unreferved countenance, pecu- liar to his country 3 near him is another group, confifting of Menander, Moliere, Congreve. —Bruma, Confucius, Mango, Capac, &c. Next to Homer, on the other fide, fits the great arch bifhop of Cambray, with that firft of all human productions, his ineftimable poem of Telemachus 3 Virgil is Handing between, and leaning on the arehbiftiop’s ftioulder. The next figures are Taflb, Ariofto, and Dante, the laft of whom, with his hands on the fhoul- ders of his two dependents, is leaning forward, attending to Homer. As to Ariofto, X am happy to fay, that he C *37 ) he is now our own, fince, from the fpi- sited and mafterly tranflation of him, by the ingenious Mr. Hoole, we alfo are now enabled to enjoy that copious, un- bounded fancy, that eloquent fenfibility, and felicity of expreffion, which have long been an inexhauftible fund of delight to the people of Italy. Behind Dante, fits Petrarch, with his hand locked in that of Laura $ and between them, and i further in the picture, is Giovanni, Boc- caccio, &c. In the fecond range of figures, juft over Edward the Black Prince, and Peter the Great, of Ruffia, I have brought to- gether Dodtor Swift, Erafmus, and Cer- vantes ; near them is Pope, Dryden, Ad- difon, and Richardfon, the author of Clarifiai behind Dryden and Pope, is Stern, Gray, Mafon, Goldfmith, Thomp- fon, and Henry Fielding j near Richard- fon, is Hogarth, Inigo Jones, Wren, and Vandyk : every body knows that this iaft mentioned great artift, had it much C *38 ) at heart to execqte fome great hiftori- cal work, which (liquid remain as a mo- nument of his abilities ; with this view he went to France, where he found N. Pouffin employed at the Louvre ; he then returned to England, and propofed to his rcyal patron, to paint the proceflion of the knights of the garter, for the fum of $o,oo0l. and though it has been often regretted, that this work was never car- ried into execution, yet the lovers of art will have fome confolation, to find that it is nqt totally loft, as Vandyk’s original defign, which was painted in Chiaro Ofcuro, and is in the poflefiion of the earl of Northington, is now engraving by my yery ingenious and long e (teemed friend, Mr. Cooper, whofe great profeflional ta- lents it fincerely rejoices me to fee thus happily exerted. In this part of the pic- ture, where I have introduced many artifts of my own profeffion, it was my wifh to glance at the difpute between the ancient Creeks and old Italian painters for pre- eminence. ( *39 ) eminence, a queftion that has been mi|cl| controverted ; the learned, for the moft part, have inclined to the ancients* whilft the contrary opinion is adopted by tlie greateft number of thofe, who were moft conversant yvilh modern art* Much had been written by the painters of Greece, and by fome of the moft ex- cellent of them upon the art ; many of their philofophers and other great and knowing men, had alfo exprefsly written on the fame fubjedt $ and from the num- ber as well as the importance of thefe writers, it does indeed appear that a very extraordinary attention was paid to this fubjedt ; but not one out of fo many writers has come down to us, not even a fragment | fo that we have no other in- formation relative to the ftate of painting |n Greece, but what we can colled! from the mere accidental obfervations of an- cient writers on other fubjedts* If we jfhould for a moment fuppofe that modern |>idtures were all deftroyed, and that all the ( J 4 Q ) the books exprefsly written upon pictures and painters had lhared the fame fate, what kind of information could be ga- thered a thou fand years hence, even from all our other writers, refpeding the ca- pacity of Rafaelle, Titian, &c 0 Such exadly is the cafe of the ancients with refped to us, and yet fo much is to be collected even in this miferable way, that for my own part, I have not the leaft doubt but that the whole of the art of painting was underilood and pradifed by the Greeks ; there is not one mechanical excellence, that is not either diredly pointed out or palpably alluded to in the accidental mention of fome ancient writer, not merely as exifting, but as exifting in the various degrees of comparative excellence. As totheirignoranceof perfpedive, fooften infilled on, it has not been proved, and there is much prefumptive and fome di- red; evidence may be produced to prove the contrary. Be it admitted then, that the ancient painters were excellent in the inven- I 141 ) invention* drawings colouring, and com- pofition of a pidure,, The queftion does yet remain, were they more excellent than the moil excellent of the moderns j in my own opinion this matter will not on the whole, and in all the component parts of a picture, fairly admit of a decifion, fince there remains no pidures of the Greeks to compare with thofe of the mo- derns, and this only could fatisfy ; for experience every day convinces us, how little we can rely upon the accounts, de- fcriptions, and panegyrics of pidures and painters, which are tranfmitted to us through the vague exaggerated mediums of poetry and rhetoric, where particulars are but feldom fpecified, and even when they are, little elfe is difcoverable than the effort of the writer to colled the whole powers of his own art, and to ex- prefs himfelf with the greateft poffible force or elegance upon the fubjed he has in hand, and frequently with but lit- tle reference to that which appears to have Intro- ( *42 ) introduced it. Of this no one can doubt who has read Pope’s Epiftle to Jervoile, and the very fpirited and elegant Poem lately publifhed by Mr. Hayley. I know very well that Lucian and Paufa- nias do fometimes afford us the fatisfadtion of enabling us to judge of the ground of their admiration and praife : they now and then lay before us the ideas that oc- curred to the painter in the treating of his fubjedt, and in general thefe are na- tural and fometimes very ingenious ; but there is nothing fo fuperlatively aftonifh- ang as to warrant our preferring them to many inventions of Rafaelle, Pouffin, &c. Perhaps no pofitive proof can now be given, that the calumny of Apelles was fuperior to that of Rafaelle ; if it be faid that Rafaelle borrowed the ideas from the account that Lucian gives of this pidture of Apelles, and has added nothing to it from himfelf, this is true, but does not fupport the affertion one iota, for fhere are many fubjedts of Rafaelle’s own in- vention,- ( *43 ) vention far from being inferior to this of the calumny * but in general the ancient writers communicate very little informa- tion when they mention pi&ures* What Ovid elegantly fays, * that Venus would have remained buried under the fea, if Apelles had not drawn her out by his pidture/ fpecifies nothing particular $ Petrarch might have faid this of Giotto, or of any other painter, who, though comparatively bad with refpedt to our times, might have been the moft ex- cellent in his own. The Ample idea of Venus coming out of the fea, and wring- ing her hair, is all that remains of this pic- ture of Apelles . Rafaelle has made a Venus alfo, of which there is a print by Marc An- tonio i but he has added nothing of him- felf to the folitary original idea, except certain particulars, which his defign had been better without, a town and a fhip in the diftance, and in the air Jupiter cutting off the genitals of Saturn j fadls that in all reafonable probability muft have ( *44 ) have been the one prior, and the other confiderably pofterior to that on which he builds his main fubjedt. As to Titian’s Venus, in the Tribuna at Florence, the bed, the lap-dog, the woman taking dirty linen out of a box, and her own meretricious adtion, has induced me to think he never intended it for a Venus, more efpecially as there is of him in the Pallais Royal, a half figure of Venus wringing her hair, according to the idea of Apelles, with the fea in the back ground, and without any addition of his own, either good or bad* So far there appears no good and fufficient reafon for our giving any great preference tothe an- cients | but if we fhould indulgently fup- pofe, that this pidture of Apelles was not confined to the fimple idea that has come down to us, but that befides difintangling herfelf from her hair, her appearance, as Lucretius finely exprefles it, brought fplendour and delight into a gloomy world, and diffufed through the inhabi- tants ( H5 ) tants of air, of the earth, and the *fea, that principle of love and affociation from whence every thing that lives de- rives joy and continuance. But how can we fuppofe this without arraigning all the ancient critics who could have overlooked it, and who from the fenfibility and dif- cernment many of them have fhewn, cannot reafonably be fufpedted of any fuch inattention. All that has been taken notice of by the ancient writers in the ce- lebrated picture of Timomachus amounts only to the divided will of Medea, be- tween her affection for her children, and her jealoufy on her hufband’s marriage with Creufa. So far this is well and in- genious ; but the fubjedt is capable of more ; fomething might be made of the children worth taking notice of : whilfi the mother is in all this agitation, with the preparations for a facrifice around her, the younged and mod loved child may be playing at her feet ; and with an infan- tine innocence and joy calling for the at- K tention ( ) tention of his mother to a butterfly (or pfyche) he is laughingly holding up to her, whilft the elder, terrified at the agi- tation of his mother, and ignorant of the caufe of it, is feeking (belter under her chlamys or mantle. — Indications of the marriage in the diftance, &c. Whether thefe additions would deferve praife is not for me to fay, as it is a de- fcription of an unfinifhed (ketch of this fubjed which I made about five years fince. Upon the whole, it dees appear that the Venus of Apelles, the Hellen of Zeuxis, the Philodetes of Parrhafius, the Medea of Timomachus, &c. exift in the minds of many people, like Cicero’s per- fed Orator, or the Stoicks perfed Man, as fo many abftrad ideas of the mod perfed conceivable grace, or beauty, or expref- fion ^ it is therefore no wonder if Rafaelle, Titian, Corregio, and other modern he- roes, whofe errors, imperfedions, and deficiencies, we have N an opportunity of infpeding, (hall be found much wanting when * ( *47 ) when compared with fuch a hyperbolical and vifionary ftandard : it mud be can- didly admitted that there is nothing can authorife our believing that Titian was ever excelled in colouring, or the Fle- mings and Dutch in low life, flnce the art is not capable of more, or that the ancients were more excellent than the moderns in landfcape, or even in many of the Idler departments of the fuperior art of hiftorical painting ; thefe incontrovertable fads mud be acknowledged ; and yet when I refled that painting and fculpture are to a certain length the fame art, pro- poling the fame defiderata, that the paint- ers knowledge does include the whole of the fculptors, and a great deal more; that they were cotemporaries and under the influence of the fame education. I can- not for a moment helitate at giving the preference to the painters of antiquity; for when we allow them to have been Ikilled in the fublime and elegant pradice of perfonifying the abdrad perfedions of K. 2 human ( 148 ) human nature, in all the different fpecres of characters of which the Grecian my- thology corn! (led, embodying and adapt- ing, a form and a fyflem of adequate pro- portions to the abftraCt idea of wifdom, in the character of a Minerva, to majefty in that of a Juno, to beauty in Venus, in Jove, in Mars, and in Hercules, ad- mirably diftinguifhing through the whole fuite of their male and female divinities, that peculiar formation, and that fyfteim of proportions, that naturally coincided with the idea of. each character, which altogether comprehended the whole exte- rior of male and female perfection ; of this no one can entertain a doubt, as the Grecian ftatues yet remaining are evidence the moft conclufive and fatisfaCtory. But how much is our admiration of Grecian art encreafed, when we call the hiflory of thefe veftiges to our recollection ? Every body knows, that of all thofe works of the Greeks which adorned Rome, after the plundering and deftruc- tion ( M9 ) tlon of the Grecian polities, whatever was moft in efteern was carried away by Con- ftantine and his followers, to ornament their new feat of empire y thefe were af- terwards deftroyed by the blind perverfe bigotry and rage of thofe wretched mif- creants, the Iconoclaftes, and as if no monument of intellectual ability was doomed to efcape, the fucceffive devalua- tions of the Goths, Huns, and other northern barbarians in the weft, gave the finilhing blow to whatever was yet re- maining of arts at Rome. For the fame reafon that thefe works of art were taken away, we mu ft fuppofe the beft and moil celebrated to have been taken ; and for the fame reafon that they were deftroyed, we ought to fuppofe, that what was deemed the beft was leaft likely to efcape. If then what remained was confidered as of no note, the work of obfcure artifts, neither worth the removing nor the de- ftroying, and that even the veftiges which happen to be preferved of this flighted re- K 3 fufe (iSo ) fufe, is notwifhftanding at this day the admiration of all enlightened people, and that fomfc of them (land as yet unrivalled by any modern productions ; what then muft be our aftoni (lament, when we turn our thoughts to thofe works of a Phidias., a Praxiteles, a Lyfippus, an Euphranor, an Apelles, Parhafius, &c. thus mifera- bly deftroyed in confequence of their fu- perior excellence. I would recommend the confideration of this to thofe Shallow dogmatical fulky philofophers and critics, who are for meafuring the human faculties, by the fhort ftandard of what this or that artifb has done ; if any thing could teach them a ufeful lefifon, furcly this would, God Almighty has, no doubt, fixed the boun- daries of human ability, but which of you, ye critics, will attempt to point out where they lie. At the refurredion of the arts in Italy, they appear for the moft part to have been confined to the pradice of mechanical un- educated ( W ) educated people • and to have been a! mod; wholly employed on fubjeCts generally believed to be within thecompafs of or- dinary and even vulgar education. There are indeed a few illuftrious exceptions, but in Greece this matter was quite dif- ferent, their artifts were phiiofophers the moft fubtle and metaphyfical, and appear to have confidered the whole of created nature with all its fcattered perfections, but as a mere chaos, and rude mafs of in- coherent materials, thrown together by the great Creator, for the exercife of thofe intellectual faculties, he had beftowed upon man, and which he had moft wifely pnd beneficently imp relied with ideas of perfection, and a capacity of conception to which individual nature might make fome diftant approaches, but at which it would never arrive. Here then is the ftore-houfe from whence we have derived all thofe works that have filled the mind with aftonifhment, initruCtion, and plea- sure ; hence came the heroes and demi- K 4 gods ( ) gods of the Grecian artifts, whether po-^ ets, painters, or fculptors ^ hence the man of the Stoicks, the orator of Cicero, thd Lovelace and Grandifon of Richardfon, and it muff be acknowledged that all the materials of the invaluable conflellation of characters in the fo much admired Ci- cilia, which has recently added fuch a luftre to our literary hemifphere, has been happily feledted from the fame re- pertory. It is then evident and incontroverti- ble, that the Grecian artifts poffefted the very efience, fpirit, and animating foul of the art ; and, as Longinus has faid of Demofthenes, compared with Hyperides, th is one excellence outweighs the whole of what the Italians could oppofe to it $ and in this refpedt Pouffin has not too ftrongly expreffed himfelf when he affirms that Rafaelle, though an angel to the mo- derns, was an afs when put into compe- tion with the antients : if we were to compare any female figure in the cartoons of ( 1 53 ) of Jlafaelle,. . with that beautiful Greek mufe in Mr. Tpwnly ■-$ dining /parlour, how inferior, how inaccurate, how grofs and vulgar does Rafaelie appear ! The ingenious Mr. Webb has very juftly obferved that Rafaelie has fucceeded belt in the middle walk of characters in apoftles, philosophers, &c. his judgment, which was excellent, had not fufficient materials to work with in the higher fphere $ fame of the fined; antique ftatues were not yet difcovered in his time, and even of fuch as were, men had not fully digefted their opinions about them ; as the treafures of Greek learning, which only could have afforded light into thefe matters, were as yet aimed: unopened, at -ieaft not fufficiently in general circulation to fall in the way of artifts, fa that however perfect painting may have then been as an art, it was certainly very de- , fe&ive as a fcience • it is therefore no great matter of wonder, that through the whole range of deities in the hiftory of ( *54 ) Cupid Pfyche, which Rafaelle painted at the Ghigi palace, that he has miftaken, and improperly treated almoft every one of them* ** We have copies of two of thofe * For Tome little time pad this work of mine, having been pretty much feen, it has given occa- fion to a confiderable extenfion of pay acquaint* ance, and I hope of my friends ; amongd others to whom l read this little account, were Mr. Townley, and Mr. Dankerville, the latter of whom obferved to me that he was entirely of my mind, as to this ab- flradl character of the Grecian works, and the utter inferiority of what the Italians had been in qued of, that he had been for fome time employed upon a hif- tory of the art, where he had occafion to invedigate this matter very minutely ; and that he would read to me that evening a part of his work which was a com- ment upon Paufanias’s account of the feries of pic- tures by Polygnotus, which he was pleafed tq tell me had no frnali affinity with my pictures ; from what he read to me, and from what he communicated in con- verfation, I have an inexpreffible pleafure in finding that this dory and criticifm of art (after the fumbling and groping of antiquaries and pedants for two centuries pad) has at lad got into the right hands ; fuch a con- junction affords a pleafing profpedl, where the man appears alone made for the fubjeft, and the fubjedf for thg ( I 55 ) thofe pictures at Northumberland houfe ? and we may compare the feveral figures with the paflages in the ancient poets ? and the man : I hope it will be out Toon, that I may be a fharer in the utility and pleafure that mull be derived from it ; but if fuch a work fhould be retarded or ob- firu&ed from any want of attention and encourage- ment on the part of the public, it is much to be re- gretted. I mull alfo be allowed to take notice that in the twp years that I have had the happinefs of knowing Mr. Locke, it has often occurred to me how great a lofs the public is like to fuilain from his ill health and af- fluent fortune ; for notwitbllanding that I believe few fortunes have been ever employed more to the honour pf the pofleffor, or to the advantage of fociety, yet the labour of fuch a chara£ter is much wanting, particularly in this country and age ; his very difiin- guifhing fagacity, his familiar and accurate knowledge of all the arts, and all the parts of thofe arts, as well where they are flaminal, conftituent, and peculiar, as where they are communicable and univerfal ; his uncommon candour, fteady adherence, and ardent zeal for truth, and his little relifh for any favourite fyftem, would make a well digefled work on the arts, by Mr. Locke, one of the moft defnable as well as ufeful gratifications that could be well imagined. I very ,( J 5 6 ) and with the Greek ftatues, we fliali then find that Jupiter, with his hair like white wool, is not Homer's Jupiter, but is in the common place idea of God, the father, and originating in that pafiage of the pro- phet Daniel of the ancient of days. The Mercury likewife is fo far from being that delicate beautiful youth de- fcribed in the Odyffey, that he is muf- cuiar enough to fuppiy, upon oecafion, the place of his grandfather Atlas, The fame fault is obfervable in the female figures ; they all of them feem to be caft In the fame gigantefque mold, by which means the Minerva, Juno, &c. are not of larger proportions than his Venus and the Graces : nothing is more common than this error. Many of our modern painters and fculptors appear to fee nothing further very much beg his pardon for this perhaps too free ufe of his name 3 and wifh to give him the trouble of writing $ but in the handling of my fubjecf, and con- lideringthe wants of the public, it Hid from me slmofi without knowing it. ( i57 ) farther in thofe deities, than certain attri- butes and infignia, by putting on a hel- met and gorgoo^ any girlifh proportion is made to fignify a Minerva y the Petafus and Caduceus make a Mercury, and the Eagle Jupiter. Though this work of Ra~ faelle’s is defective in thefe and other par- ticulars, yet it abounds with that divine fire and enthufiafm, which will ever make it regarded as one of the nobleft productions of modern art. Since, to make ufe of an antiquated phrafe, a man may as well be hanged for ftealing a fheep as a lamb y” and that I have already ftrayed pretty far from my fubjedt, it may not be amifs to indulge myfelf a little farther, and fqueeze into this place a concern of my own, which is, in forne meafure* connedted with this great work of Ra» faelle’s. When I was ftudying the Greek fta- tues at Rome, and comparing them with the gods and goddeffes of Rafaelle, at the Ghigi, I felt myfelf irrefiftihly im- pelled ( *58 ) pelled to try how far my own /kill and ilrength would carry me in a parallel fub- jed with this of Rafaelle ; the advantages of living in the eighteenth century, after fo much intervening, and very eflential criticifm and Greek illumination, in the articles of beauty, character, fublimity, &c. thefe eflential advantages appearing to me, if not a fufficient counterpoize, yet at leafl: a confiderable acceffion of weight, in the light fcale of a Tramon- tane and a modern ; emboldened by this, I fat down, with great avidity, to a fubjed from Heilod, which is more interefting, and full of addon, than that of Rafaelle’s from Apuleius. It is Pandora, or the Heathen Eve, brought into the affembly of the gods, attired by Venus and the Graces, and inftruded in the domeftic duties of a wife, by Minerva. Apollo is finging the Hymeneal, and Mercury putting on his Talaria, to carry her down to Epimetheus her faufband. The Hors are brewing flowers, and Hebe v ' ( *59 ) Hebe carrying round Nedtar on the occa- fion ; two of the Parcs fitting in a cave of clouds behind Jupiter, are employed upon her deftiny, whilfl: the other is coming forth with the well-known cafket, which contains her portion, &c. except the mere mention which Paufanias makes of a baffo relievo, carved by Phidias, upon the pedeftal of the flatue of Mi- nerva, at Athens; this is altogether a virgin fubjeft, and, perhaps, one of the fined remaining of the ancients. As I had this work fo much at heart, and that the whole of my /Indies, whilft I was abroad, were but one continued prepara- tive to the painting of it, (which might indeed well fatisfy me, as it included the whole of the art,) it was, with great mortification, I found myfelf neceffitated to decline two very flattering offers, which were made me for the painting of it, one by his Grace the Duke of Richmond, the other by Mr. Lock ; but it was im- poffible for me to comply, as I was tho- roughly ( i6q } roughly perfuaded, that this fubjedl: would , from the very nature of it, lofe much of the grandeur of it’s effect, by being reduced to too narrow limits. On meafuring my drawing of it, fince Mr e Locke fpoke to me, I find that, according to the full extent of my own wifiies, this picture would not exceed 8 feet io inches high, and 17 feet 8 inches long, fo that it would be only 12 inches higher than a common whole length portrait. As the doing of this work (particularly for fome place in town, where it might be near the Dukeof Northumberland’s) would, in fome meafure, complete the little fcheme of art I had laid down for myfelf, I have em- braced this occafion of mentioning it to the public, or even to ftrangers, if this paper Ihould reach them ; the recollection of it naturally occurred on mentioning Rafaelle’s work at the Ghigi Palace, and the preference that was due to the Greeks : and now, with the indulgent Reader’s good favour and pardon for this tranfgrefiion* we ( i6i ) we fhall here refume our fu.bje£t, and take up that part of Elyzium, where I have introduced the profelTors of my own art. Next to Vandyk is Rubens, who with his hand on the fhoulder of the modeft and ingenious Le Sueur, is pufhing him forward among ft the ar tifts of greater confequence $ Le Brun is behind him. The next figures are Julio Romano* Dominichino, and Annibal Carrache, who are talking with Phidias, the Greek fculp- tor and architect, with the bald head, and with a ground plan of the Temple of Minerva at Athens under his arm 5 near him are two Greek painters, Nicholas Pouflin and the Scycionian Maid, with the {hade of her Lover, which gave a beginning to the art ; near her is Calli- machus the Greek fculptor, with his invention of the Corinthian capital, and behind him fits Pamphilus, who is known by fome treatifes he had written, and who is exultingly calling upon the moderns to produce any man equal to his difciple L Apelles* ( i6z ) Apelles, who is painting; on the off- fide of Apelles., Is Corregio, in whofe aftion I wifhed to exprefs a kind of negative upon the offer which Titian is making toRafaelle, or Parmeggiano of his Pallet* or colouring, to be added to the feveral particulars in which they excelled ; for it is certain, that as no painter of Italy has pofTeffed the beauty, fublimity, and knowledge difcoverable in the antique,, the union of all their good qualities would Hill be efientially defective, and not a= mount to the idea of perfect painting. Behind Rafaelle Hand M. Angelo, and Leonardo da Vinci, thofe two great and venerable trunks, from whence all the branches of modern art have derived much of fap and nutriment ; behind them are Ghiberti, Donatello, Maf- facchio, Brunelefchi, Albert Durer, Giotto, and Cimabue. Notwithftanding Hogarth’s merit does undoubtedly entitle him to an honourable place amongft the artifts, and that his little ( * 6 3 ) little compofitions confidered as fo many dramatic reprefentations, abounding with humour, charader, and extenfive obser- vations on the various incidents of low, faulty and vicious life, are very ingeni- oufly brought together, and frequently tell their own ftory with more facility than is often found in many of the ele- vated and more noble inventions of Rafaelle, and other great men ; yet it muft be honeftly confefled, that in what is called knowledge of the figure, fo- reigners have juftly obferved, that Ho- garth is often fo raw*, and unformed, as hardly to deferve the name of an artift. But this capital defied is not often per- ceivable, as examples of the naked and of elevated nature but rarely occur in his fubjeds, which are for the mo ft part filled with charaders, that in their nature tend to deformity $ befides, his figures are fmall, and the jondures, and other difficulties of drawing that might occur in their limbs* are artfully concealed L a with ( 1 6 4 ) with their cloaths, rags, &c. But what would alone for all his defedls, even if they were twice told, is his admirable fund of invention, ever inexhauftible in its refources ; and his fatyr, which is always fharp and pertinent, and often highly moral, was (except in a few in- fiances, where he weakly and meanly fuffered his integrity to give way to his envy) feldom or never employed in a dif- honeft or unmanly way. Hogarth has been often imitated in his fatyrical vein, fometimes in his hu- morous ; but very few have attempted to rival him in his moral walk. The line of art purfued by my very ingenious pre- deceffbr and brother academician, Mr. Penny, is quite diftindt from that of Hogarth, and is of a much more deli- cate and fuperior relifti ; he attempts the heart, and reaches it whilft Hogarth’s general aim is only to fhake the fides : in other refpedts no comparifon can be thought of, as Mr. Penny has all that know™ ( 165 ) knowledge of the figure and academical ftiil, which the other wanted. As to Mr, Bunbury, who had fo happily fuc- ceeded in the vein of humour and carl- catura, he has for fome time paft alto- gether relinquifhed it* for the more amia- ble purfuit of beautiful nature: this in- deed, is not to be wondered at, when we recoiled that he has, in Mrs. Bunbury * fo admirable an exemplar of the molt fin i fined grace and beauty, continually at his elbow. But (to fay all that occurs to me on this fubjed) perhaps it may be reafonably doubted^ whether the being much converfant with Hogarth’s method of expofing roeannefs, deformity and vice, in many of his works, is not rather a dangerous, or, at lead, a worthlefs pur- fuit ; which, if it does not find a falfe relifh and a love of and fearch after fatyr and buffoonery in the fpedator, is at leaft not unlikely to give him one. Life is fhort ; and the little leifure of it is much better laid out upon that fpecies of L 3 ar$ ( 166 ) art, which is employed about the amiable and the admirable, as it is more likely to be attended with better and nobler con- fequences to ourfelves. Thefe two pur- fuits in art, may be compared with two fets of people with whom we might af- fociate ; if we give ourfelves up to the Foot's, the Kenrick's, &c. we fhall be continually bulled, and padling in what- ever is ridiculous, faulty, and vicious in life i whereas there are thofe to be found, with whom we fhould be in the conftant purfuit and fludy of all that gives a value and a dignity to human nature. Near Hogarth I intended to bring in a very able malterly artift, Mortimer, whom the public foolilhly let flip through their lingers, without deriving the advantages of which his abilities were capable ; it gave me no fm all concern (as I once told him^ that he fhould ilink away from his own character, and wafte his time upon un„ meaning imitations of the banditti's of Salvator Rofa, a man much his inferior, when- ( i6 7 ) whenever he would chufe to exert him- felf. Our nobility and gentry are rather to be pitied than blamed ; they have been grolsly milled and abufed by a fuccefiion of nonfenlical cant and jargon* about the inacceflible fuperiority of old pictures* or they never would fuffer great abilities to be thus loft* by employing thofe who poflefs them upon worthlefs trifles* where nothing can be Ihewn. This illuflon has been principally kept up by interefted dealers in ancient ware* both at home and abroad* in which they have been much affifted by feeble artifts* who* hopelefs and without pretenfions to any reputation for themfelves* are Induftri- ous and artful enough to lend their little fupport to any fcheme that lhall keep back and prevent others who, from na- ture and education* are better qualified* more efpecially as there is fuch a fair opportunity ©f concealing their real mo- L 4 tives* ( i68 ) lives, under the amiable appearances of modefty, candour, and a veneration of ancient worth. If the liberty was al- lowed me of mentioning fome of my brethren of the academy, what might J Mot fay of the knowing and elegant Ci- priani, of that able and manly artiffc Dance, and the other great painters whom the academy feledted for that work of St. Paul’s ; were I to add (whom the academy would have added were it then poffible) that ingenious Proteus, Gainf- borough, who is fo becoming and fo excellent in every fhape he affumes, the ever to be admired Zoffany, and the m after ly, Wright, of Derby ? What new beauties, harmonious and fafcinat- ing arrangement of colours may we not expedt, when fuch an artift as Peters is indulged the free fcope of his fancy in an extenftve fubjedt ? Need I infift what an acquifttion of reputation it would be to this country to have the abilities of theft { 169 ) thefe % artifts put to the ftretch in fome great Hiftorical Work. They may have their faults, and where one is perhaps defective, the other may be excellent y but this ever was, and ever will be the cafe amongft men of genius and great abilities ; generous allowance mu ft be made in this art, (efpecially) where, though the mind may perhaps com- prehend, yet the powers of man will certainly never be able to execute with equal perfection all the parts of fuch an art, as is not even confined by the X It may be not improper to inform the reader, that this account having been written fome time, as i had an intention of publiftiing it in April laft, it was ©ccafionally read to many friends, and amongft others to Mr. Valentine Green, a little before his trip to Paris, On his return he has, in a very fenfible fpirited letter addrefled to Sir Joftiua Reynolds, laid before the pub- lic many pertinent and excellent remarks oa the efta. feliftiment of the arts, as well in England as in France; and I pm happy to obferve, that where he has had ©ccafton to touch upon any of thofe matters I had fead to him, they have acquired no fmall force and improvement by his manner of treating them. vifible ( J 7° ) vlfible and adtual world 3 but (what i§ much more) by intellectual abliract com- binations, (in which confifts the very effence of this art) it has within its grafp all thofe poffibilities of comple- tion and perfedt exigence, which the mind feeks for, and with which only it can be fully fatisfied. A great artift can now hardly commit grofs faults, and criticifm is ill employed about what may be negledted or deficient in great works, where the attention is fo much better directed to what is great and admirable. Let the public do but their part, let them contrive a generous emancipation for our men of genius, by affording them fuch opportunity of employment as may put their faculties to the ftretch 3 and I am confident that the boundaries of art will be enlarged. Foreigners may inful t us, by ftill faying, that our artifts want abili- ties for great works 3 but they are mif- taken, it is quite the reverie : to fay the truth, this matter lies entirely at the door ( * 7 * ) door of the great and the wealthy, who, from the general flimfmefs of their pur- fuits, and their want of ceconomy and virtue, are not able to employ our artifts upon great works. To put the immenfe fums that are played for quite out of the queftion, even the half of what feme in- dividuals annually throw away merely for waiters and cards, would more than pay one of thofe artifts for a noble pidture | fo that four of thofe great individuals, by refraining from play but for one year, might even, with the faving of this paper, packthread, and attendance money, gratify the wifhes of the academy, and do themfelves the credit of prefenting St. Paul’s Cathedral with thofe Eight Hiftorical Pidtures, which would remain as a monument of their own public fpirit, as well as of the abilities of thofe acade- micians ; and the amiable prelate who now fo worthily fills the See of Lon« don, is too much a friend to the Mufes, and ( J 7 2 ) and an enemy to gaming, to put a nega- tive upon fiich an offering. Behind Phidias, I have introduced Giles Huffey, a name that never occurs to me without frefh grief, fhame, and horror, at the mean wretched cabal of mechanics, for they deferve not the name of artifts ; and their ftill meaner runners and affiftants that could have co-operated to cheat fuch an artift out of the exercife of abilities, that were fo admirably cal- culated to have railed this country to an immortal reputation, and for the ihigheft fpecies of excellence. Why will the great, who can have no intereft but in the glory of the country, why will they fuffer any dirty, whifpering me- dium to interfere between them and fuch characters as Mr. Huffey, who appears to have been no lefs amiable as a man, than he was admirable as an artift ? When by underhand artifices coldnefs once takes place, all the reft fol- ( i73 ) follows of courfe ; pride is alarmed oe both fides, and a thoufand to one but a fettled diflike and animofi ty will follow. Thus are people of the beft and .noblefl: intentions wickedly feparated, (without knowing why) upon whole union the glory of the country, and the advance- ment of the art, does altogether de- pend. To prevent this happening in future, (for weaknefs will ever avail it- felf of trick and cunning) it would be advifeable, in fuch cafes, to deal openly and without any referves, and to fuffer a great art ill to have an opportunity of deleting thofe dark impo fit ions which perifh when they are brought into day* light ; delicacy dan have nothing to fear; for perhaps there is in the world no- thing that can better bear fcrutiny and clofe infpedtion, than the vie ws, defigns* intentions, and conduct of a great artift, wholly occupied with the love of glory. The public are likely never to know the ( i74 ) the whole of what they have loft m Mr. H alley ; the perfections that were poffible to him, but a very few artifts can conceive $ and it would be time loft to attempt giving any adequate idea of them in words. My attention was iirft turned to this great character* by a converfation I had very early in life with Mr. Stuart, better known by the name of Athenian Stuart, an epithet richly merited by the efiential advantages Mr. Stuart had rendered the public^ by his being fo very inftrumental in eftablifhing juft ideas, and a true tafte for the Grecian arts. The difcourfes of this truly intelligent and very candid artift, and what I faw of the Works of Hufley, had altogether made fuch an impreffion on my mind, as may be conceived, but cannot be exprefled. With fervour I went abroad, eager to retrace all Huffey’s fteps, through the Greeks, through Rafaelle, through dif- fedted nature, and to add to what he had been ( 175 ) been cruelly torn away from by a la- borious, intenfe ftudy and inveftigatioo. of the Venetian fchooL In the hours of relaxation, I naturally endeavoured to recommend myfelf to the acquaint™ ance of fuch of Mr, Hufiey's intimates as were ftill living ; they always fpoke of him with delight ; and from the whole of what I could learn abroad, added to the information I received from my very amiable and venerable friend Mr, Mofer, fince my return, HulTey mu ft have been one of the moil: in- offeniive, moft amiable, friendly, and companionable of men y and the fartheft removed from all fpirit of ftrife and con- tention, indeed by much too far, or he had never been neceffitated to quit his ground, like a defeated man, and leave not only the art, but bis own character, in the hands of his bafe antagonifts, to be dreffed out in a horrid, difgufting way, as a man moody, glouting, full of ima- ginary terrors and fufpicions, and pre- paring ( *7 6 ) paring himfelf for a fpeCtre in every corner. This odious character of fuch a man was circulated by thofe hypocrites who knew it to be falfe, and was readily adopted by the mifguided herd, who, without knowing any thing of the mat- ter, were weak enough to be duped into the belief of it. All men know that fuch wrong-headed characters are not only poffible, but have exifted, do and will exift ; but the immorality lay in applying it at random, without require ing fufficlent proof or evidence. How- ever, the hiftory of all ages and nations fhews this to have been a common game in the world 5 and that as the virtues of human nature have not all been bu- ried with our anceftors, neither are its vices. My friends at Bologna will blame me for omitting our Lodovico, for whom I had fuch fondnefs ; Agoftino alfo, Guer- cino and Guido 5 but I was tired, and refolved to content myfelf with Domini- chino ( *77 ) chino, and his mafter Annibal. It is very remarkable that this great man Annibal Carrache, who came to fuch a place as Rome, and fo fhortly after the death of M. Angelo, fhould have been fo far overlooked, even by that court, as never to have been employed about any papal work, and had the additional mortifica* tion of feeing all court favour em- ployment, and even the honour of knighthood, flung away upon fuch a reptile as GiofefFo d’Arpino however, let no man be difcouraged, Annibal Carrache is, notwithftanding all this, the glory of his age ; whiift the Pope, the Court, and Cavalier d’Arpino, are rotting in oblivion. In the top of this part of the pifture, I have attempted to glance at what aftrono- mers call the Syftem of Syftems where the fixed ftars confidered as fo many funs, each with his feveral planets, are re- volving round the Great Gaufe of all . things. As in my apprehenfion too M much ( * 7 8 ) .. ' • i . much has been afcribed to the proper- ties of inert matter , it was my wi(h to reprefent every thing here as effeded by intelligence ; accordingly each fyfteai is carried along in this revolution by an angel; the points of the fingers form the poles or axis on which each fphere diurnally. turns, if the exprefiion be al- lowed me, and the fituation of the hands gives the polar inclination, obli- quity, &c. I have introduced angels incenfing, &c. to mark the reference to the Deity fill! ftronger. Though there is but a. filial! portion of this great circle feen, yet I fiiould hope there is enough to hint the idea to a man of any fancy. We come now to that corner where I have endeavoured to give feme little idea of the place of final punifhment or Tar- tarus. I have introduced a kind of land- scape diftant view of a dreary continent, a volcano vomiting out flames and men, a fea and catarad of fire coming forward and ( i?9 ) and tumbling into a dark gulph, where the eye is loft, and from whence ifliie clouds of black fmoke, and two large hands, one of which holds a fire- fork, and the other is pulling down two women by the hair, who make part of a group of large figures, which are bound together by ferpents, and confifts of a warrior, a glutton, a fpend thrift, a detractor, a mifer, and an ambitious man. As the order of the garter is confidered as the moft honourable of all the orders of knighthood, I thought it likely to be the moft intelligible cha- racter! ft ic of vanity, or this vice of am- bition, more efpecially as only the lower limbs of the figure appeared. The Game - Jier , or Spendthrift, is under the Mifer 9 with a fiend wound about his neck, who by the hour-glafs it is holding before him, as a kind of fecond confcience, is goading him on to the recollection of the time he had negleCted and mifufed : it is not neceffary to fuppofe, that the M 2 cards ( i So ) cards and dice he has in his hand, had been ufed fraudulently; no, I have taken it upon the lighted; eftimate, it will be fufficient if his crime amounted to no- thing more than the wafting and deftroy- ing that time, upon thofe trifles which was given him to be employed in adive virtue. We may compliment ourfelves with the titles of innocents and in often - fives; but thefe deceitful illufory nega- tives amount to nothing. We are formed with certain capabilites, which the rela- tion we bear to fociety, to the whole moral and even natural world, calls upon us to exert and dutifully to render our- felves as perfed and as extenfively ufeful as we can. By this the body is preferved in health and vigour, and the mind ac- quires that capacity, foundnefs, and that equal, happy temperament which confti- totes the felicity of our nature. Tho’ all men may not be capable of this in the extent, yet many are in the degree, and there are none but may be equal to the attempt ( i8i ) attempt and the intention. Be it ever remembered that the higheft authority affirms, that the ufe and encreafc of the talent will be exacted from us, and not merely its prefervation. As to the warrior, I am ready to admit that wars and the fpilling of human blood, may be fometimes neceffary, jufti- fiable, and perhaps even praife worthy ; but it is fo much oftner otherwise, that we may prefume it to be the' cafe in this in dance ; and, without further remark, pafs on to that dete (table fpecies of mif- chief in which we fo much abound, the ’ Anonymous I) et raff or , with his horrid face, appearing under an innocent placid looking mafic, a dagger in one hand, and falfhood and fcandal in the other, under the guife and fignature of a lover of merit, truth, and juftice. This will , ferve as a kind of genus, including all the feveral fpecies of thefe horrid aflaffins, from the volunteer, who writes to gratify his own occafionai fpleen, rage, and envy, to the M 3 hireling ( i8a ) hireling who follows this bufinefs in an. orderly profeflional way, and is ready to ftretch his talents from a letter to a pri- vate houfe, to an effay in the news- paper* from that to a pamphlet, from profe to verfe, to bemire or bedizen, juft as his employer fhall direcft ; thefe are of dif- ferent degrees of fkill, may be hired at all prices, and can adapt a few terms of art and common-place topics of praife, cenfure or abufe, to all ranks and pro- feflions. Many painters ufed formerly to keep open houfe for them, and as far as I can learn, this practice is not yet to- tally laid aiide, If this be the liberty of the prefs, furely we derive more evil than benefit from it ; all worth and ability is by the means of this glorious Palladium, reduced to an ordinary dirty level, and fo confounded with whatever is bafe, that a reputation is hardly worth the fee-king. Truth and falfhood are fo artfully perplexed, that it requires an in- timate acquaintance with public . men* from ( i§3 ) from the fir Pc to the Lift, in order to prevent our miftaking them for the very reverfe of what they are 3 it is impoffibie to be too cautious and wary in this matter 5 and I fhall ever recoiled’, with fhame and confufion, fome vexatious miftakes into which I have been led myfelf, by a too precipitate and im- plicit reliance upon the fpecious reports and appearances by which 1 was duped in common with many others. To con- fine my obfervation, to my own humble fhed 5 even I have had more than my fhare in this national calamity, the viru- lent and very particularly marked abufe that has conftantly followed me for fome years back, may, as my friends have often told me, be an honourable tefti- mony in my favour, and the proofs they alledge from the experience of all ages, are too flattering for me to dis- pute the propriety of their application in my own cafe. I well know, that what- ever excellence will enfure a man credit M 4 with (184) with pofterity, will infallibly raife him fteady and deadly enemies amongft his rivals and cotemporaries ; and that they will be more induftrious to mifreprefent and abufe, than his friends will be to juftify him. But I would gladly have difpenfed with the honour of all this, to be relieved from the mifchief of it. I have reafon to believe that it has greatly contributed to fhorten as well as to em- bitter the life of my poor father, an honeft, plain man, who at diftance from this great metropolis, and unlhilled in its ways, naturally concluded, that his fon was the moil; worthlefs of all our artifrs* or fo much unufual labour and pains would not have been employed to prove it. Thus people, who employ anony- mous writers, may perpetrate any fraud or wickednefs with impunity, when they coniine their attack to the man who can- not afford to avail himfelf of the pro- tection of the laws. It is not the nice difeernment and truly cnb? ( i8 5 ) critical fkill of our anonymous manu- facturers of characters, that is to be dreaded, nothing lefs, it is their villainy, their total want of honour, of truth, of juftice, and every other equitable prin- ciple $ they find it eafy to throw dirt at any thing ; they calculate that fome of it will flick, and they are not likely to fce much midaken, whild there is fo much weaknefs and Gullibility in the world, and fo many people made up of meannefs and odentation, who will be ready enough to adopt and give circulation to any thing that may appear at lead a plaufible reafon why they do not employ and encourage. But few can examine and fift out the truth of things, and fewer dill would be at any pains about it. But all, or at lead the greater part of this odious mafs of vile- nefs and wrong, would be in a great meafure remedied, by obliging thofe fcribbling manufacturers of character to lay afide the mafk, and affix their names to the cenfures or praifes they have been em- ( 1 86 ) employed to circulate. Had this been the cafe for fome time paft, no injury could have followed from the abefe of a J— — , a H— , and a very long, &e, their veracity and inducements for what they did, and the veracity and motives of a Sixteen-firing Jack, or any other villain, who fubfifted by depredation . on the public, would at lead be regarded with equal abhorrence. The Italian, French, and other wri- ters, who have criticized the works of their artifts, were men of known ability, who had a reputation to fupport or to lofe, and who would not fuffer either their difcernment, information, or their fincerity, candour, and judgment, to be brought into queftion by that pofterity, whole approbation they wifhed to obtain. Vafari, Borghini, D.olci, Bellori, Freart, Felibien, the Marquis Malvafia, the Ca- valier Ridolfi, Du Frefnoy, Du Piles, &c. were very different in their views and capacities $ fome more attentive to- the ( i*7-) the mechanical, others to the Ideal parts of the art 5 but all equally holding them- felves bound, not to difgrace that Name they affixed to their works, by any par- tial, inequitable judgments : accordingly their writings have given inftru&ion and pleafure, and the world has had very lit- tle occafion to differ, and to reverfe any of their judgments. We are not without characters of this kind, whofe names are too well known and efleemed by the pub- lie, to need my mentioning of them; feme of thefe are, to my own knowledge, highly capable of foaring above common- place criticifm, and entering into the very pith and effence of art. From fuck as thefe would they but write, an ingeni- ous artifl could have nothing to dread* whether they were friends to other artiffs, or enemies to himfelf, Such writers would feel themfelves Humiliated by a nice feofe of honour, would find it ne- ceffary to eonfider the whole of a work, to eflimate fairly the importance of the ( s§8 ) Ipecies of excellence it may poflefs, whe- ther it were fuperiorly excellent in one or in many, he would fpecify the degree of this excellence, would conceal or omit nothing that could be of importance, and would make every generous, candid con- ceffion, before he would venture to flake his own name and good repute againft the artifl he may cenfure, when unbi- affed pofterity was to determine between them. As to thofe writers who may find it ne- cefifary to difpenfe with thefe formalities of reafon and juftice ; when, from kind- nefs and partiality, they are fometimes induced to beftow upon a friend, the founding title of the firft Painter, the great Painter of the prefent age, and other fuch vague indefinite praife, as fpe- cifies nothing but the writers good wifhes, and leaves pofterity entirely in the dark, and to divine in the beft manner they may be able, in what this excellence and ex- traordinary fuperiority over the other co~ tem^ ( 1 89 ) temporary painters, might have confiftec^ whether it was in the fertility, the no- velty, the dignity, the originalty, and the extent of his invention (for as this is a matter of the firft importance, it is proba- bly what pofterity will firft enquire after) or whether this extraordinary fuperiority eonfifted in a penetrating, deep judgment, in the ufeful application of piety, of wif- dom, of important morality, or of ele- gant, clafficai erudition, or whether he was fuperiorly eminent for his extenfive knowledge and academical fkill, in re- prefenting all the parts of the human body, in all the varieties of character, of adlion, and of paflion, in which they may have been diverfified in thofe admirable pictures ; he mail then have produced, to have warranted all this fuperior prefe- rence, though unfortunately no fueh pic- tures bad come down to them. But to look for thefe very effential matters a- mongft portrait painters, is like looking for wool amongft goats * and yet one fhould ( I 9° ) fhould imagine that thefe very effential particulars, muft naturally be uppermoft in the minds of knowing and learned men, when they think of excellence in the arts, and mean either diredly or by implication to decide upon the pretenfions of rival artifts. The other day, happening to Humble upon a whole length pidture of George the Firft, I believe (but his in one of the rooms at Northumberland Houfe) I felt myfelf irreiiftibly led into a kind of reverie ; this pidture, thought I, muft, doubtlefs, have been painted by the artift of higheft fafhion in his day ; he muft, confequently, have made money, kept open houfe, and had it often in his power to oblige his friends, and was, in his turn, loved by them. Some of thefe friends might have been writers, either occafionally, or by profefficn, and they have, perhaps, recorded his name (more, to be fore, according to the meafore of their own affedions and wifhes to oblige, than ( I9 1 ) than to any merit they could discover in foch work as this before me). Now, if one of thefe writers, who are pleafed fo liberally to bellow great characters, was Handing here ; let us fup- pofe him to be Pope, and at his elbow a native of Otaheite, or rather a cultivated Athenian, (whofe company would be more acceptable) how could fuch a writer juftify himfelf, what anfwer could he give to the, queftions that might be afked ? Was it . becaufe that this Mr, Jervoife had ftudied no more of the human figure than the mere face, that he has managed all the reft of this pifture in fo incorrect, flovenly, and. ftrange a way : what is this intended for, a leg; and this, and this, what is it? Fie upon it, my dear Pope, is this a work of art ? and by that hero in whom your liberality has united fo many fine qualities, the grace of Apelles ; the what have you called it, of Zeuxis, of — Is this, indeed, a painter of eminence in your ( 192 ) your eftimation ? You mud have been without eyes, as well as reflection, if you was ferious. I am not fo unreafonable as to look for any judicious feledlion, or ideal beauty, in the portrait of an individual ; thefe are, I well know, referved for the more fublime purfuits of geniufes of the higher order, whom alone we fpeak of and praife when we think of eminence in the arts : but even to defcend to thofe por- trait matters, which fo ridiculoufly oc- cupy fo much of the attention of you Englifhmen ; yet even to execute in a becoming manner, this branch of the art, it requires a fubordinate and inferior fkill of its own. Every individual being a fyftem within itfelf, compofed of a trunk or body, and its extremities or members, each of thofe parts having alfo its lefler members and fubdiviflons ; thefe at leaft might and ought to have been either given or fufliciently indicated : if the legs and thighs have not all the beauty, fitnefs and ( *93 ) and eafy grace, that we beftow upon our Apollo ; if the arms and ffioulders, the thorax, the abdomen, and the hips, are not ft ri kingly beautiful or expreffive, yet, at lead, all thefe parts have fome decided form and fttuation, as well as a certain affinity to each other, which indicate the character and habits of the individual; and is it not certain, that to reprefent in an artift-like way, each of thefe parts requires the fame ftudy and fkill that is employed in acquiring a capacity to reprefent the face, Muft you then be reminded, that reputation, honour and exalted character* is the great palm and prime reward that is fo ardently fought for with fuch un- wearied pains and toil, by thofe who have devoted their lives to the purfuit of inge- nious arts ; and can you forget that con- fcience, juftice, and honefty, ought to be confulted by thofe who will take the dis- tribution of this reward into their — — . Hold, hold, Mr. Cenfor, exclaimed Pope, t]*e arts are, I find, ferious things with N you- ( i94 ) I you Athenians $ but, furely, there needs not all this formality and argument about the trifle in queftion ^ my partiality for a friend has, perhaps, led me into an adt not ftriftly right ; and yet, after all, as Jarvis and his cotemporaries were equally confined to the fame low pur- fait ; and it may be with but little dif- ference in the degree of their fkill, ibnie allowance might be made for my rafh interference, where theobjedl was of fuch little confequence ; in difcriminating between the merits of Tweedle-dumm and Tweedle-dee, though judgment would be filent, yet friendfhip will deter- mine the preference : 1 hope it is not ne- ceflary to affure you, that if either ge- nius, or high abilities, had the leaft con- cern in the controverfy, my candour and integrity fhould never have been queftion- ed ; and, what is more, if any one had dared to diftribute charadter and prefe- rence amongft our poets, in the filching clandeftine way you fo juftly cenfure, ©very ( 195 ) every body will do me the juftice to ao knowledge, that I fhould have been the firft to reprobate it. Men are much more liable to be deceived by dwelling on the artfully bloated names of living artifts, than they could be by the confideration of their works, if we caneafi- ly, and with little fharoe, bring ourfelves to fay, the fublime, or the elegant, or the ingenious, or the great, the mailer painter, Mr. Such, or fuch-a-one, we /hall find our tone much lowered, and our found- ing epithets greatly diminifhed, when we mention their works ; when we fay, fuch a portrait of a gentleman, of a lady, of a family, remarkable for what * In a word, the contefts of portrait paint- ers for fa/hion and precedency, are of no other importance to fuperior art ; but as they happen to divert the attention of the public from it, and our pofterity will concern themfelves no more about the differences between the Hudfon’s, the Vander bank’s, the Clofterman’s, the N 2 Knel- ( 196 ) Kneller's, the Jervoife’s, the Richard* ion's, and the other unimportant triflers of the next age (if there fhould be any fuch) than we do about thofe of the laft. When the work is of no confequence, *tis no matter by whom it was executed. Moral and good writers fhould accom- pany their panegyricks with the reafons that juftifv it, if it was only for ex* ample fake to others : what ought to be of weight with them is, that it might help to put a flop to the fcandalous pradtice of our hireling fcribblers, who value themfelves upon being able, by only adopting this vague, general praife, or cenfure, to pull down, or to fet up any character, be the reafon and fadt what it may. Floating down this fiery cataradt are many figures, three of whom reprefent the abufes of power. An enraged king tearing his hair, and beating his head with that enfign of command he had fo ill employed 5 his beard and antique drefs were ( 197 ) were Intended to intimate, that he had been afofolute, and lived in times prior to the adtual, and underftood limitations of monarchy. The fecond is one of thofe Popes who had endeavoured, through the influence of his ecclefiaftical charac- ter, to grafp at that earthly power and dominion, which was abfolutely dis- claimed by the divine author of our faith, as utterly repugnant to the doc- trines and practice he had laid down for his followers ; I have, accordingly, made that world, which was the object of his ambition, the inftrument of his punifli- ment, and reprefented him with a fiery terraqueous globe on his (boulders, preaching in the flames, like another Phlegyas. His proper counterpart, the wretch on his left, holds that execrable engine of hypocrify, injuftice, and cru- elty, the Solemn League and Covenant , a Species of Croifade, equally fubverfive of peace and good government ; and much pore favage 5 deftruftive, and odious in ( ) its confequences. The Hiftory of Man- kind can fhew nothing more horrid than the afpedt of religion, as it has been ex- hibited by thofe gloomy intollerant mif- creants : they might be allowed, with impunity, to arrogate to themfelves the title of Saints, and monopolized Heaven, and confined it to what limits they pleafed. But that they fhculd fet up legal pretenfions to the exclufive foie pro- prietorfhip of the Earth alfo, and rake together for their own peculiar ufe, all the little gratifications and enjoyments of it, and fhould dare to make ufe of force, to burn and deflroy in confequence, Atheifts might well deny a Providence, if a hell had not been prepared for fuch complicated, fuch finished wickednefs. I am, however, happy in believing, that this group is likely to be of the leaft ufe of any in the pidlure ^ for kings are, at prefent, fo circumfcribed by laws, that they can fcarcely have any faults but in common with their fubje&s. The Papacy., ( I 99 ) Papacy, for feme time paft, has been lia- ble to few or no objections of any mo- ment $ and until ignorance and barbarifm return again, but little annoyance can be apprehended from that quarter : and foine of the defeendants of the fifth monarchy, men and covenanters, may be numbered amongft the moft difinterefted friends of equal laws and liberty, both civil and re- ligious. However, thefe figures may ferve as fc are -crows, and help to remind us how necefiary it may be to watch and pray, not againft thefe only, but againft the encroachments of all deferiptions of men, fince all equally love to place them- felves in power, and to have others in de- pen dance upon them : and, in truth, they are not much more biameable and vicious, who attempt thefe things, than the others are, who, from caufes not lefs reprehenfible* have fuffered them to take place, by either wilfully or inattentively neglecting to provide the neceffary bounds and ftraintSc N 4 Having ( 200 ) Having now arrived at the end of the laft pidiure, i fhalljuft obferve, that it was my wilh, when I began the work, to make pictures for the porch (if haply my abilities and circumftances permitted it) where fome future Zeno might find a ufeful text, which, with his amplyfi- cation, would be a means of inciting his hearers to the purfuit of true patriotifm and true glory, by the exertions of adtive, genuine virtue. As to the account of this work, which is thrown together in thefe papers, I have given myfelf no great folicitude about any order and ar- rangement, my intention being only to colledt the materials for a book, not to make one : accordingly I have followed whatever momentary refledtions occurred to me, whilft they appeared either agree- able or ufeful ; and in whatever place, without much regarding whether they broke in upon the narrative of what was done in the pidtures or not, I have been, perhaps, more circumilantial in the ac- count ( 201 ) fcount of thefe pictures, than was gene^ rally neceffary ; but it arofe partly from a delire to gratify the curiolity of an ami- able friend, who has it not in his power to fee them $ and partly to amufe myfelf during a ftate of very difagreeable fuf- penfc, in which it was impoflible for me to paint, whillt it w as fo doubtful whe- ther I fhouid ever be able to obtain that exhibition of my work, which was to be my foie reward from thofe for whom I had undertaken it 5 however, this ac- count may be of ufe ; and, perhaps, af- ford fome entertainment to others alfo* But, as it was hurried on without re- vifion or correction, the indulgent reader will kindly exeufe the many inaccuracies and defeats he m u ft have met with: my endeavours have extended no further than Amply to point out, in a homely, painter- like, and very curfory way, fome few of the leading ideas that occurred to me upon the variety of matter the fubjeCt of fhe work afforded ; if, haply, thofe ideas fliould ( 202 j fhould merit it, others will polifh, and drefs them out for my advantage, in a manner that it would ill-become me to attempt. By the next year I fhall be able to go over the whole work, and lick it into fuch general effedt, force of colour, and light, and fhade, as will be more recon- cileable to my own ideas of the neceflary mechanical condudt : feveral crudities will be removed by the general accord or harmony ; many parts that are too forci- ble will be weakened ; and many that are too weak will be Axenghtened, and brought forward upon the eye. All thefe fubordinate conflderations I wifhed to referve for an agreeable entertainment, after fo much labour of a more ferious and eflential kind, which required my whole undivided attention ; and, I flatter myfelf, that the Spectator will, next year, own himfelf to have been a little precipi- tate, if he fhould conclude, at prefent, that I am unftudied, and unlkilled in the infe- ( 203 ) inferior and more trifling confiderations* becaufe I have referved them to the laid I fet out in this work with a firm perfua- fion, that a more intimate union might be effected between the ideal and the me- chanic of the art, than has been generally imagined j but it appeared to me the bell method to fecure the unum necdTariuoi firft. With refpeX to many abufes that have been occafionally and freely cenfured, in the courfe of thofe reflexions, I ought to inform the reader, that a much loved and valued friend has been very earneft with me to omit them ^ he urged a great deal about imprudence, the being inat- tentive to my own intereft, the poffibility of offending thofe who might have it in their power to injure me y that many of thofe abufes were, poflibly, very ftroogly fortified with extenfive and powerful con- nexions, and might eafily crufh an un~ proteXed individual, like me, that I would be martyred, and fo forth $ he grew very fed- C 204 ) ferious, and I fell a laughing : no, no $ Bothing lefs likely to happen, faid I, your friendfhip for me clouds your judg- ment ; I know you too well not to be allured, that if you were in my fituation, you would fpurn all thofe petty confide- rations when duty required it. You have frankly acknowledged, that you was altogether of my mind, as to the juftice, the integrity, and the pertinence of thofe remarks, and that they contained nothing tinbecon)ing an honeft man, and a good citizen ; nay, you even faid, that it would be evident I had no other objeft ?n view, but the reputation of the coun-. try, and to vindicate, and fupport the dignity of that great line of art, which has ever been the peculiar delight of all cultivated people : allow me, then, to laugh at all the reft; and, to allure you, that no injury to me can be apprehended to follow from the printing of thofe re- fiedfions : the nation at large, the nobi- lity md gentry* the learned and iptelli- gent^ ( 205 ) gent, the prefent age and our pofterity % in a word, the honour or intereft (which is, you know, the fame thing) of all are (fo far as they can be concerned with arts and artifts) embarked in the fame bottom with the caufe I have been main- taining i and if my mode of expreflion ihould unfortunately appear harfh to a few individuals, and that the purfuit of my argument has led me into the invefti^ gallon of matters they might wife un- touched, this being, in its nature, una- voidable, they will have too much gal- lantry to be offended. FINIS, ( 2°7 ) APPENDIX. ‘TPHOSE who may be curious to know how this work came into my hands, the following account will fully inform, them. Immediately upon my connection with the Royal Academy, in a converfa- tion, at one of our dinners, where we chatted a good deal about the concerns of Art, I made a propofal, that, as his Majefty had given us a palace (Old So- merfet Houfe) with a chapel belonging to it | that it would become us jointly to undertake the decorating this chapel with pictures $ that it afforded a good oppor- tunity of convincing the public of the poffibility of ornamenting places of re- ligious worfhip, with fuch pictures as might ( 208 ) might be ufeful, and could poffibly give no offence in a Proteftant country; that, probably, this example would be followed in other chapels and churches; that it would be opening a new and noble fcene of adtion, would not only be highly or- namental to the country, but would be abfolutely neceffary for the future labour of the many pupils the Academy was breeding up ; adding, withal, an obfer- vation I had made fome little time before at Milan ; that, in one church there (the Domo) there was more work of pi&ures and ftatues, than the whole Academy could be able to execute in a century, even fuppofing them to work every day. Every one came into the propofal with great eagernefs. Sir Jofhua Reynolds propofed, as an amendment, that, inftead of Somerfet chapel, we had better un- dertake St. Paul’s cathedral, which was agreed to ; and he was accordingly com- miflioned to propofe it to the dean and chapter ; they confented, and we had a regular ( 209 ) regular meeting of the Academy in con- fequence, where Angelica* Barry* Ci- priani, Dance, Reynolds, and Weft* were, by the majority of votes, felefled from the body of the Academy for this purpofe j the matter made fome little noife for a time j but, in the end, came to nothing ; as we were informed in Qdober, 1773* that the Biftiop of London, Dr. Terrick, would not give his confent. Very fhortly after our difappointment in the affair of St . Paul’s, I received the following letter from Valentine Green, Efq; mezzotinto engraver to his Majefty* S I R, Inclofed you receive a copy of refla- tions of the Society for the Encourage- ment of Arts, &c. in the Strand, rela- tive to the decorating of their New Room* in the Adelphi. The favour of your O com- ( 21 © ) eoffipafry is therefore requefted, to meet the Several artifts whofe names are inferred in fhofe refolutibns, at the Turk's Head Tavern^ Gerrard Street* on Tuefday even- ing, the 5th of April next, at feven O'clock, to determine upon an anfwer to he reported to the Society. The plan referred to in the refolutions Will be, at that time, produced for youf infpedtiom I am, &c. VAL GREEN. ■ Satijbury Street^ March 31 , 1774 , Copy ( 211 } \ Copy of the Reflations of the Society of Arts , Sic, January 28 , 1774* Refolded, That in order to the deco- rating the New Room, proper Hiftorical* or Allegorical Pictures be procured, to be painted by the moil eminent artifts, provided fuch pictures can be obtained with convenience to the Society. Refolved, That it would be proper for this purpofe, to have eight Hiftorical, and two Allegorical Pictures, Refolved, That the fubje&s of the Hiftorical Pictures be taken from fome part of the Englifh Hiftory, and that the fubjedis of the Allegorical Pictures be emblematic dehgns, relative to the infti- tution and views of the Society* O 2 Re- ( 212 ) Refohed, That if ten eminent artifts can be found, who are willing to paint the above Pidtures, that the Society Ihould allow them the profits arifing from an exhibition of them, in their New Room, for a proper limited time in one year, in order, in fome meafure, to indemnify them for their time and trouble. February the i$th, Refohedy That the following artifts are proper perfons to execute the Hiftorical and Allegorical Pidtures. Signiora Angelica Kaufman,! Sir Jofhua Reynolds, Mr. Weft, Mr. Cipriani, Mr. Dance, Mr. Mortimer, Mr. Barry, Mr. Wright. y Hiftory i Mr. Romney, (Allegorical Mr. Penny, 5 ( 21 3 ) Refofaed, That the Exhibition pro* pofed, be opened by the Society* for the advantage of the artifls who ill all paint the Hiftorical and Allegorical Pictures* for the decorating the New Great Room, February the Refolved , To open the exhibition as near the time of the other exhibitions? as the nature of the Society’s affairs will admit, and that it be continued for any time the artifls fliall defire, not exceed- ing four months. Refolded, That the dimenfions of the pictures be agreeable to the plan delivered to the Society, by Mr. Green. (This plan confifted of eight Hiftorical Pictures, each 9 feet wide by n feet io inches high ; and two Allegorical Pictures, one 8 feet by 5, the other 7 by 5 *• The pictures I have executed are two of 42 feet in length each, by ]rx feet & inches in Weight'* the other four are each 15-2 in length, by 11 feet 6 inches in height. O 3 Re- ( 214 ) March the n tb. Refolvedy That upon the moft mode- rate computation, the incident expences of an exhibition of the paintings, in the Society’s new room, for four months, will not be lefs than the fum of two hun- dred and eighty flue pounds, viz. For the neceffary attendandance of Servants - - - -150 Defcriptive Catalogues -*■ - 45 Tickets - - 10 Advertifements - 70 Removing Seats 7 - - 10 jC- 285 J lefolvedy That the Society do provide the neceffary fervants to attend the exhi- bition, be at the expence of the defcrip- tive catalogues, advertifements, and other contingent charges, the whole not ex- ceeding three hundred pounds. March March the 39 th. Refolved, That Mr. Green be dehred to acquaint the artifts with the resolutions of the Society, relative to the exhibition, and report their anfwers. SAMUEL MORE, SECRETARY* Sir Jofhua Reynolds did not attend the meeting at the Turk's Head, to give an anfwer to the Society of Arts, but com- miffioned fome one of the company (Mr. Cipriani, I believe) to fignify his refufal ; other members alfo difliked the propofal ; and a letter of refufal was fent to the So- ciety, which I figned along with the reft, though I was extremely forry to lofe fuch an opportunity of ftiewing the little I could do ; and, perhaps, getting fome friends, &c. which (however it might O 4 be ( 2l6 ) be with the others) I flood in great need of. More than three years after this, viz. in March, 1777, Mr. Green, at my de« fire, propofed to the Society, that one ofthofe Royal Academicians they had ap- plied to for the decoration of their Great Room, was now willing to take the whole upon himfelf, and to execute it upon a much larger and more comprehenfive plan ; this was affented to by the Society ; and the next night Mr. Green delivered the following letter from me. S I R, The propofal for decorating the Great Room of the Society of Arts, &c. with Paintings analogous to the views of that inftitution, and declared to that Society, on Wednefday, the 5th of March, by Mr. Val. Green, member of the fame. o ( 2I 7 ) on condition the faid Society provided the artift with canvafs, colours* and models, proper to carry it into execution ; the faid propofal was made to the Society as above, by the defire and confent of JAMES BARRY, Suffolk Street , Jday Market , March 6 , 1777 . To the Chairman of the Committee of Polite Arts . The Society agreed, the work was car- ried on, and the whole of what I have received from time to time, for models and other fimilar matters, has amounted to forty five pounds; this was the only fxpenditure of the Society, in which I wiChed ( 2l3 ) wiffied to have any concern ; and it was with much difficulty I could prevail with their Secretary More, to fuffer me to have the difcretionary difpofal even of this $ to meet with fuch an infult (or what fhall I call it) and fo early in the work, had well nigh tempted me to throw up the whole bufinefs in difguft ; but on enquiry I found it arofe altogether from the Secre- tary himfelf, without his receiving any order from the Society, for fo uncivil, ab~ furd, and indelicate an interference; how- ever, as the man could have no ground of quarrel or diflike to me (as we were almoft utter Grangers to each other) I thought it heft to pafs it over, and to have as little intercourfe with him in future as poffi- ble, lince; as he appeared neither foolifh or ill-bred, I could not help regarding him as inftigated to this, by fome of my left-handed friends, whom he might think it eligible to oblige, and who were as in*** different about the intereft or wiffies of the ( 219 ) the Society, as they were eager and in- duftrious to embarr^fs me but a (haft from the old quiver, I coniidered as a thing of courfe. As 1 intended to take up the work upon a plan much more extenlive and laborious, one of my pictures being almoft equal to all that had been originally propofed, and that I had to do with a Soeiety founded upon the exprefs idea of the Encourage- ment of Arts, with fuch a Frelident as that beft of men Lord Romney ; and fuch Vice Prefidents as the Dukes of Richmond and Northumberland, the Earls of Har- court, Radnor, and Percy, the Honour- able Charles Marfham, Sir George Saville, Bart. Sir Charles Whitworth, Edward Hooper, Owen Salifbury Brereton, and Keane Fitzgerald, Efqrs; and compofed of fuch members, as Dukes, MarquifTes, Lords, and a long lift of the moft ho- nourable and refpedtable names, exhibited t© the world in the printed book of the Soci- ( 220 ) Society. In a tranfaftion with fuch cha- racters asthefe, I felt my mind perfectly at eafe* and fecured againft all contingent cies : if I Should die in the courfe of the work* the colourman would be provided for,, and I Should at leaft have the reputation of falling as became a man, in the mo ft ho- nourable effort my vocation could poffibly admit of $ but if matters took a happier turn* and that this laborious work fhould be carried through* I concluded that as the ideas of fitnefs and propriety have a refpedlable liability with men of honour and probity* and that if at one time they think it juft to contrive and to hold forth fame compenfation, as the flender reward of a certain portion of time and trouble* that a fortiori, the fame ideas of propriety* £tnef$* andjuftice* will not be wanting* when this time and trouble is enqreafed four-fold ; and therefore “ That Exhi- ** bition propofed in their New Room* ** for a time not exceeding four months* in ( 221 ) ** In feme meafure to indemnify for time “ and trouble” I confidered at leaf: as a thing of courfe* about which it would have been both indelicate and idle to ftipulate* m stii