Deerfield Reading Association. REGULATIONS 1. — The annual subscription for each member shall be two dollars, to be paid by the 1st day of January. Any person may become a member by paying that sum and subscribing his name. Any member may withdraw by giving written notice to the Librarian before or at the annual meeting in December, and paying all dues. All persons who have not withdrawn before or at an annual meet- ing will be holden until the succeeding annual meeting. 2. — Books may be taken from the Library every Thursday evening, at 7 o'clock from the 1st of Oc- tober to the 1st of April, and at 8 o'clock from the 1st of April to the 1st of October. 3. — Periodicals may be retained one weekf-and all other books two weeks. If any person shall de- tain any book beyond the time allowed, he shall pay to the Librarian a fine of ten cents a week. 4. — The first reading of new books shall be de- termined by lot. The person whose name is first drawn shall have the first choice, and so on, until all the names have been drawn. 5. — After the first reading, members may select books at their pleasure. . If two or more members desire to draw the same book, it shall be put up at auction, and the highest bidder shall be entitled to draw it. But no member who has drawn one book shall draw or bid upon another, until every mem- ber present has drawn one book. 6. — When a book is damaged, the Executive Committee shall require the amount of the damage from the member in whose hands it is when the damage occurs. 7. — The Librarian may loan books to persons not members of the Association, at six cents a week per volume ; and the person so hiring sball be, with respect to the books, subject tdJaF] the liabil- ities of members. < T 1/ I i AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL KECOL LECTIONS. IN PRESS : THE LIFE OF SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS. BY MR. LESLIE. WITH NOTICES OF HOGARTH, WILSON, GAINSBOROUGH, AND OTHER ARTISTS, HIS CONTEMPORARIES. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2013 w http://archive.org/details/autobiographicalOOIesl_0 AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL RECOLLECTIONS. BY THE LATE CHARLES ROBERT LESLIE, R.A. EDITED, WITH A PREFATORY ESSAY ON LESLIE AS AN ARTIST, AND SELECTIONS FROM HIS CORRESPONDENCE, By TOM TAYLOR, Esq., EDITOR OF THE " AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF HAYDON." WITH PORTRAIT. BOSTON: TICKNOR AND FIELDS. M DCCC LX. Albemarle Street, London, April 30, 1860. Messrs. Ticknor and Fields : Dear Sirs, — Acting on behalf of the representatives of the late Mr. Leslie, R. A., I have great pleasure in placing in your hands the early sheets of that eminent Artist's " Memoirs and Correspon- dence " for exclusive publication in the United States ; believing that you, as personal friends of the late Mr. Leslie, will be most dis- posed to promote the interests of the work and of the family. I remain, Dear Sirs, Yours very faithfully, John Murray. RIVERSIDE, CAMBRIDGE: STEREOTYPED AND PRINTED BY H. 0. HOUGHTON AND COMPANY. **■ GtTTV CENTER LIBRARY EDITOK'S PEEFACE. It is owing to the innate modesty of the late Mr. Leslie's character, that in his Autobiographical Recol- lections the part occupied by himself and his pictures is small in comparison with that devoted to his con- temporaries and friends. So great is my respect for Mr. Leslie, that I have hesitated long before giving to the world any more about him than he had thought fit himself to prepare for publication. But when I took into account his claims to considera- tion as a painter, I felt strongly that readers must wish to know more about the man than he had himself told them — more about tjje circumstances and influences under which his pictures were produced; the present state and locality of these pictures; their subjects; the way in which those subjects are treated, and the general characteristics of his style. I have therefore attempted, in an Introductory Essay, to classify and describe such of Leslie's more important works as I have been able to examine personally, and to give a general appreciation of his artistic qualities, and his position in the English school. I have, further, selected from the correfpondence placed VI PEEFACE. at my disposal, the parts bearing on the painter's works, and on his life as connected with his works. Without such an addition to the Autobiographical Recollections which Leslie had himself made ready for posthumous publication, this volume would not — as it seems to me — have contained the information required to give it its proper place among the artistic biographies of the time — such lives as have been published, or are preparing, of Wilkie and Constable, Etty, Haydon, and Turner. In using the matter entrusted to me, I have been guided by the strongest regard and respect for the painter, and for the family that is left to lament the irreparable loss of such a husband, brother, and father. I have endeavoured to bear in mind, always, the mod- esty, tolerance, and good taste which ruled throughout Leslie's life and labours; and to respect the time and patience of my readers. Affectionate admiration for my subject may, however, have in some cases misled me as to what was worth printing about him — hav- ing regard, at least, to the wider public. I have little fear that the many friends of ^Leslie, and the large circle of them who, like myself, have loved and bene- fited by his works, will think I have extracted too much from his letters, or that I have rated the man or his pictures too highly. His son, Mr. George Leslie, writes thus to me, of, the manner in which the Autobiographical Recollec- tions were composed: — " The manner in which my father's autobiography was writ- ten was this. He was in the habit of writing down accounts of anything of importance that occurred to him all his life, and PREFACE. vii it is from these notes and from letters which he collected, that the autobiography you have was composed. " We have reason to believe that he commenced it about ten years ago, writing in it from time to time. The reason it ends abruptly was not on account of- failing health, but be- cause all the time he could spare from his painting was, dur- ing the last year of his life, occupied by him in writing the life of Sir Joshua Reynolds, at which he worked hard even a month before his death." TOM TAYLOR. AUTHOE'S PREFACE. My object has been to preserve in these pages some recollections of those chiefly whom I could praise; and of them, not the faults and foibles that are more or less common to all men, but the merits that are rare, and on which alone their claims to dis- tinction rest. I mention this that I may not be charged with dealing too much in panegyric. C. R. LESLIE. CONTENTS. Page Introduction: On Leslie's Pictures xiii General Characteristics of Leslie as an Artist . . xlvii CHAPTER I. Voyage to America — Engagement at sea — French ship vanquished — Youthful bravery — The Newfoundland dog — Residence at Lisbon — Departure from Lisbon — Arrival at Philadelphia .... 1 CHAPTER II. Desire to be a Painter — George Frederick Cooke — Departure for England — New Acquaintances — Visits to the Theatre — Allston and Cole- ridge — Visit to Clifton — Obtain the Academy medals — Fuseli and Westmacott — Visit to Paris — Coleridge's lectures on Shakespeare — Fragments of Coleridge — Coleridge at Highgate — Charles and Mary Lamb 15 CHAPTER III. President West — Washington Irving and Walter Scott — Visit to Oxford — Elected associate — Sir Joshua Reynolds — Flaxman and Lawrence — Flaxman and Canova — Chantrey — Garrick and Parliament . . 37 CHAPTER IV. Wilkie — Visit to Scotland — Visit to Abbotsford — Anecdote of Mrs. Coutts — Walter Scott at Home — Visit to Edinburgh . . . .54 CHAPTER V. Lord Holland — Lord Egremont — Anecdote of Lord Egremont — Petworth — The Rev. Sidney Smith — Anecdotes of Sidney Smith — Constable, the Painter — Walter Scott in London — Alfred and John Chalon . 66 CHAPTER VI. Appointment in America — Letter of Lord Egremont — Ai-rival in New York— Sojourn at West Point — Return to England — Samuel Rogers and Stothard — Anecdotes of Stothard — Old Lady Cork — Newton, the Painter . . .80 xii CONTENTS. Page CHAPTER VII. Visit to Cashiobury — Sir Joshua Reynolds — Theatrical Stars — Jack Bannister — The Sistine Chapel — Chantrey — Holland House — Sir George Beaumont — Constable, the Painter 95 CHAPTER VIII. Lord Egremont — The Coronation — The Duke of Wellington — Lord Mel- bourne — The Princess Royal — Wilkie's Asiatic Sketches — Raim- bach, the Engraver — Newton and Wilkie — Wilkie's Letters . . 108 CHAPTER IX. The. Wellington Statue — Westmacott, the Sculptor — A Sea-Captain's Stories — Etty, the Academician — Sir Robert Peel — Sir Martin Shee — Visit to Paris — President Eastlake — The Great Exhibition . . 121 CHAPTER X. Turner — Turner and Ruskin — Turner's Pictures — Sir Charles Eastlake — Landseer — The Engravers of England — Wilkie's Prints — Engrav- ing Auctioneers 133 CHAPTER XI. John Howard Payne — Haydon, the Painter — Haydon's Journal — Hay- don's character — The Chalons and Cattermole — British, French, and German Schools — Dessin's Hotel — Peter Powell — Samuel Rogers — Rogers's " Table Talk " 145 CHAPTER XII. Prince Saunders — Wilson's Ornithology — Peter Pindar — Matthews " At Home " — Kenney, the Dramatist — Rogers and Maltby . . .162 Extracts from Leslie's Correspondence 171 APPENDIX. List op the Principal Pictures Painted, and of all the Pictures Exhibited by C. K. Leslie, K. A 357 INTRODUCTION. ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. It has been my lot to be entrusted with the ar- rangement for the press of two artistic autobiogra- phies — that of Haydon, and that of Leslie. It is difficult to imagine a completer contrast than is formed by the characters, lives, and works of these two painters. Haydon presents to us a nature all self-confidence, passion, and combativeness. He was exclusive in his theories ; reckless in his defiance of difficulties; unscrupulous in the means he took to re- lieve them ; untiring in his appeals to patrons, and public men, and the public. Regarding himself as a martyr to High- Art, he claimed to the full all the immunities and indulgences that the most lenient and sympathetic judgment could attach to that position. Alternately elated with the most buoyant hope and depressed by the deepest despair — fighting, struggling, appealing, asserting himself his whole life through, he closed a stormy and sorrowful career by suicide. But through all this tempestuous life, he loved his art passionately, and was truly and deeply attached to his wife and his children. His pictures seem to me to reflect at once his lofty aims and his practical short-comings. Their unquestionable power and vigour are marred by ever recurring evidences of haste, slovenliness, coarseness, and lack of taste. xiv INTRODUCTION. In Leslie, on the other hand, we see the man of cautious, trustful, respectful nature from the first. Slow in the formation of his judgment, disposed to defer to others in his art and out of it, but strong in principle, and apt to hold stubbornly to convictions once grasped; not given to court notoriety or public- ity, and rather shrinking from than provoking con- flict; asking only leave to pursue the even tenor of his way in the practice of the unambitious art he loved, among the quiet friends he valued; equable, affectionate, self-respecting to the point of reserve and reticence ; valuing good taste and moderation as much in art as in manners; averse to exclusive theo- ries or loud-sounding self-assertion in all forms ; clos- ing a happy, peaceful, successful, and honored life, by the calm and courageous death of a Christian, and leaving behind him pictures stamped in every line with good taste, chastened humour, and graceful sen- timent — pictures which it makes us happier, gentler, and better to look upon — pictures which help us to love good books more, and to regard our fellow-crea- tures with kindlier eyes. The lessons of two such lives ought not to be writ- ten in vain. For power, passion, and variety ; for cu- rious revelation of character, eloquent criticism, and vivid sketching of men and manners, the little Leslie has left written is altogether unworthy of comparison with those bulky records of himself from which I se- lected the materials for the autobiography of Haydon. But scanty, and comparatively colourless, as Leslie's remains may be, they are of value in throwing light on the character, as well as on the works, of the painter — that part of him which alone has an inter- est for us. Before entering on the subject of Leslie's pictures ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xv in detail, I think it essential to fair appreciation of the painter and the man, to give the reader such knowl- edge as I can of his method of working, and of his daily habits. " His painting-room," says his son George, " differed from those of most artists in one point. He never hung up any of his own works or studies on the walls, but had a great many fine examples of other painters — chiefly copies by himself from the old masters. He considered that an artist who fed his eye with his own works was sure to get into a mannered style of painting. He painted in the simplest manner, always trying to get his work like in tone and colour to the object he painted from as soon as possible. He had a particular objection to the practice of pre- paring his work in one colour, to be afterwards altered to another by glazing. He used to say, that unless you possessed a most extraordinary knowledge of the chemical, as well as modifying, qualities of colours, it was always very uncertain whether you would obtain by that means the exact tint you wanted. " He was very quick in working, especially in painting heads ; I don't think he ever kept a model more than two hours at a time, and generally finished a head the second day, though he frequently rubbed his work out, if it was not satisfactory to him, and painted it in afresh. I have often sat to him, and he had always finished before I was tired. " He very seldom praised his own work ; but I have often seen him laughing at some expression that pleased him in his picture. " In giving instruction to young artists he used to say very little, but he would take the palette and brushes himself, and show them a great deal. He never, however, took this trouble with any student for whom he felt there was no hope. He was kind to all young artists, and never spoke to them in the way of criti- cism without some qualifying expression, such as, 'I may be wrong,' or 1 Perhaps you are right.' " His palette was always kept clean, and he put more colour on it than he thought he should use, as he said he hated a starved palette. On the same principle he provided himself with a most liberal supply of brushes, in the choice of which he was a little xvi INTRODUCTION. different from most artists I have seen work. He used a great many more sable brushes than any other, and was especially fond of very small ones, with which he put the delicate touches on his heads. " He worked very steadily and cheerfully, keeping up a sort of whistling at times, which I think he was unconscious of, as he was always absorbed in thinking about what he was painting. I re- member him once walking about looking for his palette-knife, which he was holding in his hand all the time. " He had a very pretty habit of going into the garden before breakfast and picking either a honeysuckle or a rose — his fa- vourite flowers — and putting them in a glass on the mantel-shelf in his painting-room. I hardly ever saw his room in the summer without these flowers, and we have a little sketch of a rose, which he picked and brought into the house so gently that he did not disturb a beautiful little moth on it. " He took a great interest in astronomy. His knowledge of this science was very slight, but the pleasure he had in the vari- ous appearances in the heavens was unbounded, so much so, that he used to say an eclipse seemed to take place on purpose for his pleasure. He once said to me that he thought it very likely that part of our happiness in the next life would be derived from find- ing out the wonders of the creation which are hidden to us here. " He entertained the greatest veneration for all celebrated sci- entific men, and once had a correspondence with Professor Fara- day on the blue colour of the sky. The Professor's kind replies delighted my father beyond measure." The following was the usual distribution of his day: — " He would rise," writes his son, " about eight o'clock in the winter, and about seven in the summer, when he would walk in the garden before breakfast. He had breakfast at nine, and en- joyed the newspaper very much, taking great interest in poli- tics, or any topic that occupied the public attention. He always read a chapter in the Bible to us all afterwards, and then, about half-past nine or ten, he would commence work, sometimes being ON LESLIES PICTURES. xvii read to at the same time. He did not object to the presence of any of his family in his room, but sometimes, when very busy, he would turn us out, especially the younger ones, whom he called ' trudies,' his corruption of intruders. He was never irri- tated by anything whilst at work, but seemed always calm and happy. He was rather absent in his mind about trivial things. He would sometimes strike a carpet-pin, mistaking it for a lucifer match, and was very apt to forget people's names, unless con- nected in some way with his art. But if any one possessed a fine picture, however commonplace and uninteresting that person might otherwise be, he always remembered his name, and was al- ways ready to go and see him. " He lunched at one, and would generally leave off work about four o'clock, when he would go out, but seldom without some ob- ject, as to see pictures at the auction-rooms, or to call on people who possessed pictures. " He dined generally at six o'clock, and, after a nap, would either play at chess, which he was very fond of, or else would read to us from Shakespeare or ' Don Quixote^ and sometimes passages from ' Tristram Shandy.' He was very fond of having friends to see him in the evening, though unless his company possessed some knowledge of the art he took but little pleasure in them." The Petworth Collection is richest in Leslie's pic- tures of all our private galleries — having regard to the merit, if not the number, of the pictures it contains. After Petworth must be ranked the galleries of Mr. John Naylor at Leigh ton Hall, Welshpool, Mr. Edwin. Bullock and Mr. Joseph Gillott at Birmingham, Mr. Thomas Miller at Preston, and Mrs. Gibbons in the Regent's Park, London. Our National Gallery, espe- cially the Sheepshanks collection, is, happily, richer than even the richest of these. * * The Duke of Bedford, the Earl of Essex, Mr. Harris, Mr. Bates, Mr. Bick- nell, Mr. Thomas Baring, Mr. Heugh, Mr. Newsham, Mr. W. C. Sole, and other collectors in this country, possess important pictures of this master. There b xviii INTRODUCTION. It is pleasant to me to think that so many of Leslie's pictures should have found a home among the mills of Lancashire and the smoking forges and grimy work- shops of Birmingham. They are eminently calculated to counteract the ignobler influences of industrial occu- pation by their inborn refinement, their liberal element of loveliness, their sweet sentiment of nature, their lite- rary associations, and their genial humour. I can speak from personal observation to the real appreciation of these pictures in such places, not on the part of their possessors only, but among the many, both masters and workmen, to whom these galleries are so liberally opened. Leslie testifies in one of his letters to the extraordinary change which he had lived to see in the source and spread of patronage for the painter. The nobleman is no longer the chief purchaser of contemporary pictures. It is mainly to our great manufacturing and trading towns that the painter has to look for the sale of his works. The class enriched by manufactures and commerce is now doing for art in England what the same class did in earlier times in Florence, Genoa, and Venice, for the art of Italy ; in Bruges, Antwerp, and Amsterdam for that of the Low Countries and Holland. The change may have its evil as well as its good. There may be some risk that it will multiply the manufacture and in- crease the homeliness of pictures, to say nothing of less direct and obvious ill-consequences. But against such risks is to be set the likelihood that purchasers of this class will, in the main, insist upon something like fidelity to nature, and truthfulness of ex- pression and sentiment. They are rarely beset by pre- judice in favour of old schools or time-honoured conven- tionalities ; ceteris paribus, they are likely to prefer pic- are others in America, in the collections of Col. Lenox of New York, and Mr. Joseph Miller of Virginia, U. S. ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xix tures which are the growth of the time, and appeal to the time, to those which belong to the past, and speak to the past — or, in other words — living to dead art. In Mr. Naylor's collection the painter may be studied in his earliest and latest manners, — in the 6 Sir Roger de Coverley going to Church' (1819), (the original pic- ture painted for Mr. Dunlop), and the ' May Day in the time of Queen Elizabeth' (1821); and in one of the last works of his pencil, ' The Interview of Jeanie Deans and Queen Caroline ' (1859). The two former pictures demand notice first as works of a time when Leslie was most himself; that is, when he had felt the influence of neither of two painters who materially affected his later practice — Newton on the one hand, and Constable on the other. Both these pictures are simply painted, with a due admixture of solid and glazing colour; and neither shows the least sign of impaired tone or failing surface. They are as bright and sunny in effect, and as free from crack or decay, as when first painted. The original 'Sir Roger' is finer in tone than the repetition. Parts of it indicate a close study of Ho- garth, especially the old yeoman who stands to receive the Squire's greeting, with his fresh, pretty daughter on his arm. In the latter I recognise the lady who, some four or five years after the picture was painted, became the painter's wife. Sir Roger, in his full suit of crim- son velvet, on his way up the pathway to the little church, pats on the head the widow's children, who look up to him with round, wondering eyes. Their mother is a sweet and comely rustic matron. The head of Sir Roger, Leslie tells us in his Life *of Constable, was painted from an old Royal Academician, Mr. Bigg,* likelier to go down to posterity in this picture * " I thought him," he says, " in appearance and manners, a perfect speci- XX INTRODUCTION. of Leslie's than in any of his own works. The Spec- tator, who accompanies Sir Roger, is commonplace enough. But he is, after all, but a colourless personage in Addison's own hands. The rustics who line the pathway are all true to nature. Besides the group of the old man and daughter already described, there is a full-blown young woman, sticking a flower into her boddice, and a moon-faced labourer, in a smock frock, looking over 'her shoulder, both quite worthy of Ho- garth. Even in this picture — painted in 1819, when the painter was only twenty-four, — there is no observa- ble deficiency either in drawing, colouring, or composi- tion, or in linear or aerial perspective. I should say at least as much for the ' May-Day,' in which, besides all these merits in the figures, there is shown a power of effective landscape-painting, of which Leslie has left us few examples. The scene may be supposed to be in Kent. The foreground is a knoll, from which the eye ranges over a wide stretch of level and richly cultivated woodland, with a distant manor- house and church. Overhead is a bright spring sky, with wreaths of sunlit cloud. The family and guests of the manor-house furnish the foreground groups, the principal of which is made up of a fantastically dressed gentleman of the court in crimson velvet, and the rustic beauty of the manor to whom he is paying euphuistic court. She timidly accepts his offered hand for the dance, hardly understanding the meaning of his quaint and far-fetched phrases. She wears a tawny robe, over a blue petticoat. To the right of the foreground, a stately Elizabethan dame, in farthingale of scarlet and gold, and am^le ruff, looks on at the sports, while her jester behind her in red, yellow, and green motley, slyly men of an old-fashioned English gentleman. He was one of the most amiable men who ever existed." ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xxi draws an ass in a lion's skin on the buckler of one of the blue-coated serving-men, who complete the right- hand group. A little further off, to the left, are gath- ered, in reclining groups on the grass, or standing under the trees, the rest of the gentry, who have assembled to watch the shooting at the butts and the May games, in full swing on the green below. You see part of the line of the merry morris-dance, where the meadow falls beyond the foreground. These dancers are drawn and grouped with a spirit and freedom not unworthy of Ru- bens. Near them stands the old sable-clad schoolmas- ter — rod in hand, and spectacles on nose — who watches the dancers himself, reverently and fearfully watched the whole time by a group of his small scholars, who clearly are not satisfied that the rod is there by mere inad- vertence of habit. On the level sward in the distance sits the May Queen under her arbour, while before her sweeps the merry rout of masquers round the May-pole — Robin Hood and Maid Marian, Much and Scathe- lock, Little John and Friar Tuck, with the fool, the dragon and the hobby-horse, surrounded by a ring of applauding village spectators. As we look, we seem to feel the fresh soft spring breeze among the trees ; to hear the clashing peal from the steeple, mingled with the pipe and tabor, and the sound of joyous carouse, over beef and ale, from the booth beyond. I know no blither, brighter, more exhilarating picture. There is masterly skill, and truth above all, in its dis- tribution of light and shadow, always so difficult in a day-light, open-air picture, with many figures. The well-known engraving by Watt does justice to it. Next in order of time, to these pictures, come those in the gallery at Petworth. First of these stands ' San- cho and the Duchess.' Of all Leslie's pictures this is probably the most popular, and in none are his peculiar xxii INTRODUCTION. merits more gracefully and happily displayed. The in- cident is fully described in the passage * from Shelton's translation of Don Quixote, which accompanied the picture in the Academy catalogue for 1824. In the expressions of the actors, the painter has caught the very spirit of the scene. Sancho half-shrewd, half- obtuse, takes the Duchess into his confidence, with a finger laid along his nose ; his way of sitting shows that he is on a style of seat he is unused to. Chantrey sat to Leslie for the expression of the Sancho, and his hearty sense of humour qualified him to embody the charac- ter well. The Duchess's enjoyment breaks through the habitual restraint of her high breeding, and the grave courtesy of her Spanish manners, in the sweetest half- smile — a triumph of subtle expression. The sour and literal Dona Rodriguez is evidently not forgetful how Sancho, on his arrival, had desired her to have a care of Dapple. The mirth of the whispering waiting-maids culminates in the broad sunshiny grin of the mulatto- woman. Nor has Leslie ever been happier in the com- position of any picture. All the accessories are painted with fine finish, the nicest sense of propriety, and careful attention to effects of direct and reflected light. Petworth was a treasure- house to Leslie of old-world wealth in furniture, jewel- lery, china, and toilet ornaments ; and during his visits there he made careful and numerous studies of such objects. Here he saw and studied such things in their places, which may help to account for the naturalness and propriety with which they are always introduced by him. The three versions f of this subject are full of varia- * See correspondence of that year. f I might have said four, for I have just learnt that there is a fourth Sancho, which had found its way to the United States, and is now in this country, in the gallery of Mr. Farnworth. Leslie painted a good deal upon it after its ar- ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xxiii tions in detail. Leslie never repeated a picture exactly. In the Petworth picture the principal light falls upon the lovely face and white satin robe of the Duchess, and is carried out by the lightish green china vase to the left. In the Vernon repetition, the principal light is focussed by the white and gold pilasters, conducted thence by the Duchess's head and shoulders, and the duenna's white apron, — which is wanting in the Petworth orig- inal, — and carried out to the left by the open music- book and the back of the chair ; while on the right it is continued in both by the shoulder of the mulatto, the head-dress and collar of one of the waiting women, and Sancho's shining bald pate. The Petworth San- cho has blue breeches : the Vernon Sancho is dressed entirely in black and drab. In the original picture the Duchess's inner robe is a pure silvery satin, deliciously painted ; the outer robe a delicate purplish grey ; in the Vernon picture her inner dress is a light golden yellow : her saccque a darker purple lined with green. The wall to the right, in the earlier version, is covered with green tapestry. This tapestry is red, with a blue border in the later one. There is no picture of the Duke on the wall behind the Duchess in the Petworth original, as there is in the Vernon repetition. The dress of the waiting damsel in the foreground of the earlier version is a warm salmon colour ; it is russet green in the other ; and the flower on the toilet-table is red in the former, white in the latter picture. In the quality of its colour the Petworth picture is, to my mind, immeasurably finer than either the version of the subject painted for Mr. Rogers, or that painted for Mr. Vernon. The lines of the composition are the same in all three pictures ; and the general distribution of the light and rival here from North America; but not having seen this picture I can say nothing of its variations from the others. xxiv INTRODUCTION. shade is identical, though the objects which make up the balance of colour are varied in each, with great pains, and thorough knowledge. The Rogers picture brought eleven hundred and fifty- guineas at the sale of the poet's gallery. Mr. Leslie was present. A country dealer seated beside him, who had been absent from the room when the picture was knocked down, seeing that Mr. Leslie had noted the prices in his catalogue, asked to look at it. " Good gracious me ! Eleven hundred and fifty guineas for Leslie's picture ! Did you ever hear of such a price, sir?" "Monstrous, is it not?" said Leslie, who told the story to his family with great glee on his return home. The Petworth picture is singularly rich and harmoni- ous in effect, and transparent throughout in its paint- ing. It is, I think, altogether, for expression, composi- tion, and colour, the finest example of the painter, and exhibits him in the very prime of his powers, and while under the influence of Newton as a colourist and work- man. But the surface has cracked slightly, owing to the incautious use of glazing colours — asphaltum, above all, that most fatal to durability of all pig- ments. The repetitions, though less glowing, are both in perfect preservation,' and are solidly and simply painted, with a very cautious use of glazing. They both belong to the period when Constable's influence had superseded Newton's, and when Leslie was satis- fied that his pictures should look white and chalky while fresh, in the faith that they would mellow with time. His practice exemplifies the only" case in which the colour of pictures does really change for the better. Leslie's later works have mellowed in a very noticeable degree. I can myself perceive that even his latest and weakest pictures — the ' Jeanie Deans ' for example — ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. XXV have improved wonderfully "in the short period which has elapsed since they were painted. After the ' Sancho,' the most interesting picture at Petworth is the i Catherine and Petruchio.' This is the first version of the subject, of which the Sheepshanks' picture is a repetition with variations. For example, the remains of the meal on the table to the right of the spectator are quite different in the two, though touched in both with a precision worthy of Teniers. In this case also the colour of the Petworth picture is superior in glow and power, and I did not detect in it any sign of cracking. In their disposition of colours, the two pictures are very much alike ; but we have only to com- pare the satin gown, which is the object of Petruchio's rage, in the one and in the other, to recognise how much more powerful Leslie was in his management of colour in 1832, than at the later date of the Sheep- shanks' picture. The ' Introduction of Gulliver to the Queen of Brob- dingnag,' (1835) appears to me a mistake in subject, and a very inferior work of the painter's in all techni- cal respects. Instead of the Brobdingnagians looking like giants, Gulliver looks like a pigmy. The colour, tried by Leslie's own standard, is violent without being rich, and for the first and last time, as far as I know, in Leslie's pictures, appears to me unrefined and inharmo- nious.* The only passage of humour worthy of the painter is the face of the old lady, who is curiously exam- ining the strange little creature through her eye-glass, and the look of the farmer's little girl who is crying for the loss of her plaything. The other Petworth pictures — ' Lady Carlisle carrying the pardon to her Father in the Tower, and 'Charles II. at Tillietudlem ' — must be classed * Another picture very closely resembling this in the quality of its colour, is the ' Columbus,' now in the Collection of Joseph Gillott, Esq. XXVI INTRODUCTION. in the second rank of the painter's works. The first subject is hardly a paintable one. It is impossible to convey, by a momentary expression, the conflict in the Duke's mind between the temptation of liberty, the stubbornness of parental authority outraged by his daughter's marriage against his will, and the haughty consciousness of innocence, which kept him so long a prisoner when the least submission or effort might have opened his dungeon door. Nor is there anything very available for t*he painter in the Duke's " three magi," — Harriot, Warner, and Hughes ; nor does one see very clearly what part Raleigh is taking in the action of the picture. Perhaps the point of effect, after all, is in the contrast of the eager, fluttering young woman, and the serene abstraction of the two learned prisoners, and their three aged companions in study, thus startlingly broken in upon. The stately old lady of Tillietudlem gives a better opportunity to the painter, and he has in- dicated her delighted pride in the King's salute, in his happiest manner. There is Lesliean humour too, in the introduction of Cuddie Headri gg as an attendant strip- ling, gazing, open-mouthed, upon the royal visitor. To those who feel an affection for Leslie, Petworth is almost as interesting for its associations with the paint- er's life and works as for his pictures to be seen there. It was here that he was able to study the forms and col- our of rococo furniture — of tapestried chairs, China jars and monsters, broad Venetian mirrors, gorgeous brocade and damask hangings, and massive silver and silver-gilt plate, still in daily use. You may see at Pet- worth, where Leslie is still affectionately remembered by the old servants, the screen and chairs which he has painted in the ' Rape of the Lock ; ' the old globe, intro- duced in the ' Lady Carlisle ; ' the carved mirror and jewelled casket of the Duchess's toilet-table ; Sophia ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xxvii Western's China jars, and console ; the window, with its look out on the swelling slopes of the park, where sweet Lady Jane Grey sits absorbed in Plato, while the hounds and horns are making merry music in the sun- shine without. Here is the very Gainsborough which Constable tells Leslie he could not " even think of with- out tears in his eyes," and the Bassan which Leslie was allowed to have up in his bed-room ; Vandyke's Lady Anne Carr, which showed him the height to which high- bred grace and loveliness could be carried in portrait- ure; Titian's Catherine Cornaro, to reveal the still deeper magic of diffused Venetian splendour. Here too, among some of Turner's finest landscapes, and Romney's most bewitching repetitions of Lady Hamilton's haunting face, the visitor will find the ' Jacob's Dream,' the master- piece of Leslie's early friend Allston, a correct but cold Academic production, with a grace that seems to belong half to Westall, half to Raffaelle ; and the ' Contempla- tion,' of the same painter, a female figure of a conven- tional cast of beauty, in a somewhat affected attitude, backed by a mannered landscape. Don Quixote was a favorite source of subjects to Leslie. Besides his thrice repeated ' Sancho in the apartment of the Duchess,' we owe to the same book many of the painter's best pictures. As first of these in date after the ' Sancho ' should be mentioned, ' Don Quixote while doing penance in the Sierra Morena, deceived by the disguised Dorothea and the Barber.' The picture belongs to the Earl of Essex, for whom it was painted, and has been well engraved. The Knight of the Rueful Countenance, " all naked to his shirt, lean and yellow," courteously promises to redress the wrongs of the " fair princess Micomecona, Queen of the Great Kingdom of Micomeca in Ethi- opia." Dorothea kneels before the knight in her gor- XXV111 INTEODUCTION. geous attire — " a whole gown of very rich stuff, and a short mantle of another green stuff, and a collar, and many other rich jewels," — while her train is borne by the masquerading Barber, who kneels before the mules, with much-ado keeping on the beard that hangs down to his girdle, " half red and half white, as being made of the tail of a pied ox." Sancho whispers the mysterious lady's quality in his master's ear, while the Don's ar- mour hangs like a trophy on the cork-tree to the right. The knight is an admirable conception, dignified, courteous, and gentle in his craziness ; and quite indif- ferent to his scanty costume, in his anxiety to relieve the injured princess. Leslie was the very man to appre- ciate the noble side of Don Quixote's character; and even if his own refinement had not revealed this side to him, he had ample opportunity of learning it from Coleridge's exposition of the profound conception of Cervantes. This picture is another good example of the painter's best time as a colourist ; but it is not supe- rior in this respect to the little sketch of the subject in the National Collection, which is quite Venetian in its glow of harmonious colour. I know only from the engraving the head of Don Quixote painted in 1827. Perhaps Ogilvie sat for it — an old friend of Irving's and Leslie's. He was certainly one of his models for the knight. Another was an old Frenchman — a protege of Constable's — called Fon- taine. But I think I trace Leslie's own features in the Don Quixote of Mr. Bates's picture, and I am told by his son that he was much in the habit of studying expressions from his own face. He painted a head of Sancho too, in 1827. But the admirable ' Sancho ' in the Sheepshanks' Collection is of the date of 1839. This is the engraved head. Sancho sits at his Tan- talus-table, in the sumptuous palace of his capital of ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xxix Barataria, the laced bib under his chin. You see the hand of the physician Don Pedro Regio de Aquero, holding the whalebone rod at whose touch the dishes vanish from before the hungry Governor. We may suppose the partridges to have been borne away by tap of rod, followed by the boiled conies and the veal — and last but worst — the olla podrida. Sancho's choler is just rising to that point at which, after threats to do for the physician, he bids them let him eat, or else take his government again : for " an office that will not afford a man his victuals, is not worth two beans." Leslie painted the scene in full for Lady Chantrey, in 1855. I will not venture to' speak of the merits of that pic- ture from my half-effaced recollection of it in that year's Exhibition, and it was not within my reach while pre- paring these remarks. But the Sheepshanks' 4 Sancho ' all can see, at cost of a visit to South Kensington. More truthful humour was never put on canvas of the same dimensions by any painter at any period. The hot, hungry impatience, and indignant questioning ex- pression of the face are irresistible. It is only a pity that, to enjoy the picture thoroughly, one must know one's Don Quixote well. As a piece of sound, solid painting, this head ranks high among Leslie's minor works. Chantrey may have aided Leslie as a model for the expression. But the head was painted, his son George tells me, from the family fly-driver. The Dul- cinea which hangs near it might as well be called by any other name. It is neither the Dulcinea indicated in Cervantes, nor a Spanish peasant-girl at all. Proba- bly the painter never gave it the name of Dulcinea. The picture painted for Mr. Bates in 1849 represents the Duke's chaplain leaving the table in disgust at his lord's encouragement of Don Quixote's delusions. The canvas is of the largest dimensions ever ventured on by XXX INTRODUCTION. Leslie. In a rich hall of noble decorated architecture is spread a stately table, covered with silver plate, fruit, and wine in chased flagons. Don Quixote, in the cen- tre, in his straight hose and chamois doublet, draped in " the fair mantle of finest scarlet," which the two beau- tiful damsels had cast upon his shoulders on entering the castle, drawn up to his full height, and " trembling from head to foot like a man filled with quicksilver," is delivering that impassioned and grave rebuke to the vulgar -Canon — " Is it, happily, a vain plot or time ill spent, to range through the world not seeking its dain- ties but the bitterness of it, whereby good men aspire to the seat of immortality? .... Some go by the spacious field of proud ambition ; others by the way of servile and base flattery; a third sort by deceitful hypoc- risy; and few by that of true religion. But I, by my star's inclination, go in the narrow path of knight- errantry ; for whose exercise I despise wealth, but not honour; I have satisfied grievances, rectified wrongs, chas- tised insolencies, overcome giants, trampled over spirits." By the hidalgo's side stands Sancho, just risen to vindi- cate himself and his master. The Duke, in black velvet doublet and purple hose, is enjoying the wrath of the in- dignant churchman, hiding his laughter behind his hand. The face of the gentle Duchess, who looks up at the angry confessor from among her attendant damsels, is irradiated with one of those latent half-smiles, by the charm of which Leslie has enabled us almost to excuse in her the thoughtlessness that could find matter for mirth and practical joking in the wreck of Don Quix- ote's noble nature. The puzzled but well-disciplined attendants stand round, doing their best to suppress all expression in their looks. In the fore-ground the indig- nant ecclesiastic is sweeping out of the room with pro- testing hands outstretched, and an angry flutter of his ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xxxi ample black robes, his fat, vulgarly-imperious face swol- len and inflamed with rage — ".Your Excellency is as mad as any of these sinners ; and see if they must not needs be mad, when wise men canonise their madness. Your Excellency may do well to stay with them, for whilst they be here I'll get me home, and save a labour of correcting what I cannot amend." I am inclined to think this the finest picture, both in point of expression and technical qualities, painted in the latter half of Leslie's career. Its tone is luminous and rich, without blackness. The architectural features are peculiarly graceful and stately. The figure of the chaplain is admirably conceived and perfectly natural ; in the angry insolence of the attitude and countenance you see the overbearing indignation of the narrow- minded man, accustomed to lay down the law and to be listened to — and now bearded by a madman ! Don Quixote is thoroughly earnest and dignified ; San- cho inimitably quaint and sturdy. The plate and des- sert on the table are painted with the greatest- relish, and a precision worthy of Teniers. Leslie had a pas- sion for fine old silver, and preferred its pictorial effect to that of gold plate. He made the most careful water- colour studies of every thing on the table, down to the figs, grapes, and melons, and borrowed the plate for painting from Storr and Mortimer's, I believe. Mr. E. M. Ward, the Royal Academician, stood for the figure of the attendant, near the entrance in the back-ground, and his brother for the Duke. • He had Spanish models for some of the other heads. The Duchess, in her dove-coloured robe and ruff, is only second, for high- bred charm, to the Duchess of the Petworth picture.* * I gather from the extracts in the Royal Academy Catalogues, that Leslie used Shelton's — the raciest and oldest — translation of the masterpiece of Cervantes, made in the reign of Charles the Second. xxxii INTRODUCTION. There is a little picture in the collection of Mr. Jo- seph Gillott, at Birmingham, of the Duke and Duchess reading ' Don Quixote.' It has a sober power in its colour, and a quiet gracefulness in its composition that make it very noticeable in spite of its small size. After Addison and Cervantes, Leslie resorted for sub- jects to Shakespeare, Moliere, Swift, Pope, Sterne, Field- ing, Goldsmith, and Smollett. Besides his illustrations of books, he painted portraits, a few subjects from Eng- lish and Spanish history, some from the New Testa- ment, and a very few from his own invention. I propose to notice briefly the principal works in each of these classes. As he began and ended with Shakespeare, — painting ' Murder' from 'Macbeth,' as his first picture, in 1813, and ' Hotspur and Lady Percy,' as his last, in 1859 — and as he took more of his important compo- sitions from our great dramatic poet than from any other single source, I notice the Shakespeare subjects first. ' The.' Merry Wives of Windsor,' for reasons one can easily understand, was a special favorite with Leslie. Its life-like, genial pictures of English country manners in the days of Elizabeth, and its copious introduction of marked types of humorous character, gratified the painter's peculiar tastes, and suggested capital subjects for his pencil. The play is eminently English in feel- ing, and Leslie was " ipsis Anglis Anglior" He loved and knew the quiet meadows and shady elms of Wind- sor, and all the green borders of Ihe Thames from Hampton to Maidenhead. I have no doubt he believed, with perfect faith, in the inmates and visitors at Ford's and Page's. They were to him actual men and women, and not clothes-pegs. He painted the scene of ' Slen- der' s Courtship ' three times, besides the early picture of the garden scene, with Anne inviting her bashful ON LESLIE'S PICTUEES. xxxiii admirer in to dinner. I have seen none of these pic- tures, and only know their composition from the plates. The former has been well engraved for the American Art Union, from which I infer that one of the three ver- sions of the subject is now in America. The scene is an oak-panneled parlour in Page's house. Anne stands in the bay window, with the summer light glowing in her pretty face and on her rounded figure, as she plucks a flower to pieces to give herself a counte- nance. Slender stands afar off, hat in hand and looking half sheepish, half scared, and wholly silly ; while Shal- low, in his velvet coif, with an emphatic crutch -handled stick to give point to his periods, spurs him on to his wooing. Judging from the engraving, the picture must be a peculiarly sunny one, suggesting pleasant country life in low-roofed old oak-panneled rooms, with buck's heads over the doors, moral saws carved over the heavy man- tel-pieces, iron dogs on the hearths, a pleasant breath of lavender and honeysuckle from the garden without, and glimpses of the castle and the park oaks, through the broad, stone-shafted, deep-bayed lattice windows. I have little doubt all these interiors were painted from real houses. They have a look of such genuine truth. It is in the chief room of such a house that he has twice painted Page's dinner-party — with the pippins and cheese on the side-table — first in 1831, and afterwards in 1838. The second picture is at South Kensington. He has been happier, I think, in later Falstaffs. The fat knight, in chamois doublet and long boots — a bot- tom of sherris-sack in his glass — is passing compli- ments with Mrs. Ford and Mrs. Page, who stand arm- in-arm a little behind him — two plump, comely, sly- looking matrons, in whose faces the painter has cleverly indicated their mutual understanding and quiet resolve to have their will of the greasy old cozener. Page, with c xxxiv INTRODUCTION. his broad back to the spectators, swings back in his chair, offering a cool tankard to poor Slender, who, with Simple in attendance behind him, fidgets uncomfort- ably on the edge of his stool, his embarrassing beaver and gloves beside him, not daring to lift his eyes to demure Mistress Anne, sitting coyly apart on her own side of the table. Ford is draining his glass higher up the board, beyond the group formed by Bardolph and Pistol, who are noisily claiming Sir John's ear. Shal- low, at the opposite end of the table to Page, is directing Sir Hugh Evans's attention to the progress of Slender's sheepish wooing. Through the broad window behind the justice the creepers and trees of the garden make a pleasant rest for the eye. The side-table, on the right of the fore-ground, is spread with the immortal pippins and cheese, painted with that truth and relish which Leslie always puts into the accessories of his pictures, but not so daguerreotypically wrought as to divide and distract attention from more important matters. Over the broad fire-place is one of those gnomic inscriptions, once common in English country-houses, and the logs are smouldering — summer as it is — against the fire- dogs on the open hearth. The picture is a fine example of the painter's middle manner, without any dangerous use of asphaltum, (of which the visitor may see the charm and danger exemplified in Newton's < Bassanio ' in the same room,) and equally free from such excess of chalky-white as is apparent in the ' Who can this be ? ' just over it. Attention should also be directed to the masterly perspective of the picture, both linear and aerial. This is evidently a chamber to be walked about in, with room and verge for the fair long table, the guests and servants. A later ' FalstafT' may be compared with this, in Mr. Harris's picture of the fat knight personating the king ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. Xxxv before Prince Hal, Poins, Dame Quickly, and the other actors in the scene at the Boar's Head, from ' Henry the Fourth.' This picture was painted in 1851, and, though it is surpassed in technical qualities by the Sheepshanks picture, I prefer its Falstaff, for conception and charac- ter, to the earlier one. No doubt Leslie felt and meant to indicate the superior humour and raciness of Shakes- peare's great creation in its original form. Here Fal- staff has just assumed his cushion-crown and his foot- stool-state, and is lecturing the Prince who stands be- fore him with a well-expressed air of mock respect. Francis, the lank drawer, setting down a pottle of sack, glances up with the expression of one who humbly asks leave to enjoy the fun, while his mistress, Dame Quickly, in full giggle, seems to say, ' Oh, the Father! How he keeps his countenance.' Poins looks criticiz- ingly on, leaning on one of the joint-stools, which we may suppose he has an itch to vault over, half-jealous of the way the knight is making as his young master's tav- ern-joker in ordinary. But even in this orgie Leslie has contrived to give us a refreshing glimpse of pure and lovely nature, in the flowers strewed over the floor, which he has painted with most affectionate delicacy and faithfulness. Whole sheets of studies in oil for these flowers were among the relics of the painter sold at Foster's a few weeks ago. They must have cost him many a day's labour. But this he never spared — paint- ing and repainting even the minutest accessories, till he had brought every detail in his picture up to his own high standard. Nor was his labour done when he had painted such things from nature. There was as much thoughtful work afterwards in subordinating and gener- alizing these studies^ to suit their place, purpose, and relative importance in his composition. In this point, as in so many others, Leslie's example is of especial xxx vi INTRODUCTION. value in these days of over-emphasized and unbalanced elaboration. His picture from < The Taming of the Shrew ' I have already noticed. From the < Winter's Tale' he painted two subjects — the ' Autolycus,' a pic- ture projected and partly painted before 1823, but not exhibited till 1836 ; and the < Perdita,' exhibited the fol- lowing year. Both are now in the Sheepshanks collec- tion, and deserve to rank among the best works of this period. The former represents the scene where Autoly- cus is puffing his pedlar's wares among the shepherds and shepherdesses outside the old shepherd's cote. The knave, with his box of trinkets and trumpery about his neck, is just twanging off the title of his wonderful ballad " of a fish that appeared upon the coast, on Wednesday the four-score of April, fifty thousand fathom above water, and sung the ballad against the hard hearts of maids." Mopsa and Dorcas are scanning the pedlar's toys with greedy eyes, while another shep- herdess listens entranced to the tale, " very pitiful and as true," and the clown, eager for ballads, bids the rogue " lay it by." The sky is a bright and breezy blue, with white clouds. Beyond is a stretch of level mead, with the far-off sheep feeding, and to the right of the group is the mountain ash, with its red berries, which Leslie introduced by the advice of Constable. In this picture, at least, the influence of the last named painter upon Leslie is seen under its pleasantest form — in the delightful character of summery open- air freshness and breeziness, which indeed it needed no secondary influence to make Leslie feel, but in the rep- resentation of which Constable's counsel and example powerfully helped him. For my own part, I feel this to be, on the whole, the most cheery and ' happy ' work of the painter. It is free from chalkiness, and its colour is bright and harmonious. I should have been thankful ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xxxvii for the absence of the vermilion cap which Autolycus wears ; but to Leslie no picture was complete without its vermilion element, though I think he has seldom managed it with the felicity which gives the colour such value in the De Hooghes and Terburgs, from whose practice he adopted it. Irving particularly admired the expression and character of Autolycus, and, as I think all who study the picture, must admit, with good reason. In the ' Perdita ' by its side, the painter has not fallen behind the exquisite sentiment of Shakespeare's scene, in which the royal shepherdess distributes the flowers to her guests. Perdita herself, is one of the sweetest and most graceful creatures ever embodied upon canvas ; and the painter has never, as far as I know, exceeded this most graceful conception for loveliness and unaf- fected charm. Exception may be taken to the colour and texture of the scarf over her shoulders, which looks more like oiled silk than any other material. Nor can I admire the disguised Polixenes and Camillo ; nor does the Florizel seem to me worthy of such a Perdita. Les- lie painted a Hermione from the same play for Mr. Brunei, but I cannot speak of this picture from recent examination. ' Henry the Eighth ' was another of Leslie's favour- ites among the historical plays. He has painted no fewer than five pictures from it — two repetitions of Catherine's dying scene, where through Capucius she commends her daughter and her women to the king: and two of the same sick and dethroned queen in her palace at Bridewell, where she addresses one of her women — " Take thy lute, wench; my soul grows sad with troubles, Sing and disperse them if thou canst." The former date in 1850. Of the latter the first was xxxviii INTRODUCTION. Leslie's diploma picture in 1826 : the second was painted in 1842. There is in all a pathos befitting their incidents. I cannot help thinking the smaller repetition of the former subject, in the collection of John Naylor, Esq., finer in chiaroscuro and colour than the original pic- ture painted for Mr. Brunei. Another picture from the same play represents the moment, from the fourth scene of the first act, when Henry at the masque in York Place pulls off his vizard and makes himself known to the Lord Cardinal. A warm glow of lamplight is dif- fused over the picture. The king — the central figure in the group of masquers and ladies, in a tunic of gold and scarlet, leading fair Anne Boleyn in his hand — reveals himself to Wolsey with a laughing face and a jovial rollicking swing of his brawny body — not yet that mountain of flesh which Holbein painted. Wol- sey comes forward from his seat on the dais under the canopy of state, to " make his royal choice " — a wily, smooth, politic priest, with a subtle blending of inward imperiousness and outward respect in his bearing. But the picture does not rise, either in expression or execu- tion, beyond the second rank among the painter's works. If Leslie ever painted a sweeter head than the Per- dita, it is certainly the ' Beatrice,' running like a lap- wing, her mantilla thrown over her shining brown hUr, through the sun and shade of the pleached garden alley, to listen to the gossip of Hero and Ursula. No wonder he was often called on for repetitions of this bewitching picture. The original is in the gallery of Mr. Gibbons, and I have often wondered how it has so long escaped the graver. This is Beatrice in her arch natural loveli- ness of feature and mien — not Benedick's biting, gib- ing, persecutrix. In its sober yet sunny harmony of col- our the slightly-painted garden background forms a set- ting worthy of the sweet face and lovely stooping figure. ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xxxix ' Twelfth Night ' supplied him with a twice-painted subject — Sir Toby Belch encouraging Sir Andrew Aguecheek to accost Olivia's roguish maid Maria. The original picture was painted in 1842 for Mr. Thomas Baring : the repetition in 1850 for Mr. Edwin Bullock. It is hard to say which is the better picture, and this is true of several of Leslie's repetitions. In both, the Sir Toby is admirable — a better embodi- ment of Shakespeare's conception, I am inclined to think, than Leslie's Falstaff. Probably the latter de- fies the painter for the same reason that he defies the actor ; the character has too many shades, too sub- tly blended, for complete realization either on the boards or on canvas. It is worth noting how nicely Leslie has discriminated Sir Andrew Aguecheek and Slender, two characters which on the surface seem so like each other. The feeble conceit and pretension of the shallow Illyrian knight are rendered with a thorough appreciation, which imparts an expression to his face and figure quite different from that of the sheepish, but comparatively simple-minded Windsor franklin. The Maria is an arch little shrew ; very different in dress and feature in the two pictures, but in both true to the character drawn by Shakespeare. In point of transparency and richness of colour, especially in the background — an oak panelled room, with a palma-like portrait on the wall half hidden by a crimson curtain — the latter picture is the better of the two, but it shows rather a greater tendency to that blackness which was always one of Leslie's besetting sins, as he was quite conscious. He twice painted the subject of Olivia showing her face to Viola, from the same play, and a sketch for a third version of this inci- dent was on his easel at the time of his fatal attack. Mrs. German Reed, when Miss Priscilla Horton, sat to him in Covent Garden green-room in her costume of INTRODUCTION. Fortunio, as a mode] for the Viola. But I have not seen the pictures. The sketch sold after his death was very sunny and brilliant in effect. From Milton Leslie painted but one subject — the Lady in Comus with the Enchanter presenting to her the Circean Cup. His fresco from this incident in the summer-house in Buckingham Palace garden, though cold and dry in colour, and poor in the nude portions of the composition, is successful, as might have been expected, in the Lady, its central figure, which is purely conceived, chaste in expression, and graceful in action. Tristram Shandy was one of Leslie's favourite books, and has furnished the subject of one of "his best pic- tures — Uncle Toby in the sentry-box, innocently under- going the fire of Widow Wadman (1851). Three ver- sions of this subject are in the National Collection, bequeathed respectively by Mr. Sheepshanks, Mr. Ver- non, and Mr. Jacob Bell, and the plate by Lumb Stocks is one of the most popular engravings after Leslie. As usual, the three pictures vary in detail. In the Vernon picture, for example — the second painted — Uncle Toby wears a red waistcoat, and the widow has no apron, while her lawn kerchief is thicker and more closely pinned than in the earliest and latest versions, in both of which Uncle Toby wears a buff waistcoat, and the widow a lawn apron as well as kerchief. On the whole, the Sheepshanks picture must be pronounced, I think, the most vigorous in colour and the most perfect in ex- pression ; but Uncle Toby's hands are too delicate for the rest of his figure, and inferior to those in either of the later pictures. ' Inimitable Jack Bannister,' one of the pleasantest of actors, most genial of companions and kindest of men, and a genuine lover of Art into the bargain, sat for the Uncle Toby ; and it would be hard to find a better model for him. This picture is per- ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xli haps the best illustration of Leslie's perfect taste. Any painter with a stain of impurity in his imagination would have risked offence in touching such a subject. There is more prurience in Sterne's pen than in Leslie's pencil. In his hands the widow becomes so loveable a person, that we overlook the fierceness of the amorous siege she is laying to Uncle Toby's heart ; while Uncle Toby himself is so thoroughly the gentleman, — so un- mistakeably innocent and unsuspecting, and single- hearted, — that the humour of the situation seems filtered of all its grossness. I like less Leslie's other picture from Tristram Shandy, of Tristram discovering his unfortunate " remarks " twisted up into papillotes in the hair of the chaise-vamper's wife (1833). He seems to me to have missed his usual grace in the figure of the French- woman, and the colouring appears to my eye heavy and disagreeable. Constable, Leslie tells us in one of his letters, arranged the chiaroscuro of this composition for him. The only picture which Leslie painted from Gold- smith, — whom one would have supposed likely to be one of his favourite authors, — is the ' Fudge ' scene from the 4 Vicar of Wakefield' (1843), now in the col- lection of Mr. Miller at Preston. I regret that I am unable to speak of this picture from recent examina- tion. Fielding has furnished him with the subject of one of his prettiest small pictures — Tom Jones showing Sophia Western her own face in the glass as the best security for his own future good behaviour. The pic- ture was painted in 1849, and repeated in 1850 for Mr. John Harris. I only know the latter ; but I find it diffi- cult to believe that the original Sophia Western could have been lovelier than she is in the repetition. Besides the exquisite ladylike grace of the Sophia, the picture xlii INTRODUCTION. is remarkable for the great skill with which the painter has managed the light from the windows between which hangs the mirror reflecting Sophia's sweet face. This is one of many examples of the profit to which Leslie had put his studies of De Hooghe. Another is to be found in Mr. Bicknell's picture, ' The Heiress,' — a young lady just come into a large fortune, and embar- rassed by the multiplicity of the correspondence, and the excessive kindness of the friends her money has brought upon her. Here the light falls through tall red- curtained windows, throwing a mellow glow over the furniture of the handsome room, in which the graceful young heiress is receiving her guests and dictating to her amanuensis. The effect was probably suggested by a well-known evening piece of De Hooghe's in the col- lection of the Duke of Wellington. Moliere was another of the great humourists often laid under contribution by Leslie. He painted three times over the scene of M. Jourdain's discomfiture in his newly acquired art of fencing under the vigorous, inar- tistic thrusts of his servant-girl, to the immense delight of his shrewish wife, who stands by. The Sheepshanks version of the subject (1841) is slight and sketchy, but full of spirit in the action, and of truthful indication in the light and shadow. The repetition in Mr. Gillott's collection appears to me richer in colour and more sol- idly painted. The Jourdain in both is perfect as a con- ception of character, and it would be impossible to convey better the suddenness and irresistible fury of Nicole's attack. She has not even thought it worth while to lay aside her besom. The scene where Trisso- tin reads his sonnet to the blue-stockings of the Hotel Rambouillet (painted for Mr. Sheepshanks in 1845) is a picture of far higher technical merit. Though as a whole it is disagreeably chalky in texture, there is great ON LESLIE'S PICTUKES. xliii power over the resources of the art shown in the way the light from the lustres is distributed over the scarlet hangings, and reflected in the tall mirror. Hogarth him- self would not have surpassed the action and expression of the reading pedant, and the die-away ecstacies of his lady-audience, whose affectation is relieved by the sweet face of Henriette, one of the most graceful of Leslie's many exquisite conceptions of female beauty. Another subject from Moliere in the Sheepshanks col- lection is that scene of the ' Malade Imaginaire,' where the unhappy Argan is abandoned by his indignant phy- sician to all the terrors of his own unaided constitution. I have little doubt that Leslie painted the expression of the pleading hypochondriac from his own face. The Toinette is peculiarly successful. The picture was painted in 1843, but is not one of the pleasantest of its period in colour or execution. From the ' Rape of the Lock ' Leslie took one of his largest and most elaborate compositions. The first pic- ture was painted for Mr. Gibbons in 1854. It was repeated for Mr. Bullock two years later, with many variations in detail. The scene represents the moment when Belinda mourns over the discovery of the ravished lock. She is weeping in the foreground surrounded by a sympathetic group of ladies. The Amazonian Tha- lestris, in tricorne and riding habit, indignant at the Peer's boldness, grasps her whip with an evident long- ing to use it over the insolent beau's shoulders. In the background Sir Plume is occupied on his unavailing mission, and the Peer displays the captured lock in triumph. The scene in which the action passes was painted from one of the rooms in Hampton Court Pal- ace, and most of the details of the furniture were from Petworth studies. Mr. Millais stood for the Peer, and I trace the features of two of the painter's daughters iii xliv INTRODUCTION. the group round the aggrieved Belinda. When he re- peated the subject for Mr. Bullock, he introduced por- traits of that gentleman's daughter, in place of his own. As a composition this is among the best works of Les- lie's pencil, though there is an unpleasant predominance of that chalkiness in colour which grew upon him dur- ing the last ten years of his practice. The peer is the weakest figure in the composition. Strange to say, he does not look like a gentleman of the time of Pope, but like a modern gentleman masquerading. The Sir Plume is as genuine as the Lord Petre is unreal. The tall and commanding lady in the crimson sacque, whose back is turned to the spectator in the foreground, is a masterly example of drawing and colour, and the pic- cure is deserving of close study by young artists for the great art shown in its easy, natural, and yet most pro- foundly calculated composition. It is a capital exam- ple, too, of Leslie's admirable management of light and shadow. But, on the whole, I cannot but prefer to it, — for power in the rendering of character and for nice discrim- ination of humorous expresssion, — the 1 Reading of the Will,' from Roderick Random (1846), also in Mr. Gibbons' collection. Here, though all the figures, with the exception of Lieutenant Bowling and little Rode- rick, are in deep mourning, so masterly has been the painter's management of colour and light and shadow, that there is no heaviness or monotony in the general effect of the picture. Lieut. Bowling was painted, I believe, from an old harbour-master at Broadstairs, and is a capital conception. One of Mr. Stanfield's sons sat for the Roderick, and one of the painter's daughters for the fainting legacy -hunter, who is upset by the dis- covery that her name is not among the squire's legatees. This is, I think, the picture in which Leslie most chal- ON LESLIE'S PICTURES. xlv lenges comparison with Hogarth,- both as a painter and as the teller of a story ; and his work bears the difficult test bravely. In point of composition the picture is as deserving of study as the ' Rape of the Lock,' which hangs opposite to it. It is not my intention to say much of Leslie as a portrait-painter, though his head of Archbishop Howley, and his full length of Lord Cottenham, in his Chancel- lor's robes, show that he might have taken a high rank in this branch of his art, had he followed it. He rarely, however, painted life-size portraits, and in the absence of such evidence of his power as only portraits on the scale of nature can supply, it may be well not to insist on his claims in this particular department of art. We may be certain he never would have failed in his render- ing of character. I have not seen his picture of £ Lady Jane Grey refusing the Crown,' but the engraving sug- gests an effect of colour which shows the influence of another of his favourite masters, Paul Veronese. I re- member the delight which I experienced before his little picture of the same gentle lady found by Roger Ascham sitting over Plato in the oriel, while the chase sweeps on without. But I have not seen the picture (which is in Mr. Miller's fine collection at Preston) since it was exhibited in 1848. I can recall its silvery summer light, the serene sweet face and slender figure, and the glimpse of the green park, with its swelling uplands and stately trees — a reminiscence of Petworth. There is another pathetic little historical picture at Kensington, of the Infant Princes at their prayers, in their dark Tower bed- chamber, on the night of their murder. The subject is taken from an affecting scene in Heywood's tragedy of ' Edward the Fourth,' and was twice painted by Les- lie. Of his Court pictures — the 4 Coronation,' and the r Christening of the Princess Royal ' — I will only say xlvi INTRODUCTION. that he appears to have encountered the difficulties of the subjects boldly, and to have vanquished as many of them as a painter of such scenes in this age can be expected to do. To make courtly ceremonials effective incidents for the pencil, there needs, at once, in the painter a kindred power to that of Veronese and Titian, and in the subject something of that splendour of pag- eantry and glory of costume which embellished mediae- val life. Jn our day it is hardly possible to keep down the most fatal suggestions of the upholsterer and the milliner. But, even if the difficulty had been less, Les- lie was not a decorative painter. He was unaccustomed to the scale demanded by such subjects, and had noth- ing of the splendour of colouring which can invest with a charm even the fittings of Banting and Gillow, or the inventions of the Court modiste and plumassier. Leslie succeeded admirably in the portrait portion of these dif- ficult pictures. The group of attendant ladies in the coronation picture, especially, is painted with an intense sentiment of that grace and beauty which the subject supplied, and the painter was peculiarly qualified to reproduce. Again, the passages in either picture which most appeal to the heart, are painted with true feeling ; as, for example, the Maiden Queen, kneeling with bared and bowed head at the altar under the heavy burden of her coronation robes, while the sunbeams shed their glory upon her, like the blessing of heaven made vis- ible ; or the crowned young mother's look, as she turns to her first-born with that yearning which makes all women kin. I have spoken elsewhere of Leslie's pictures from sacred subjects, and from those domestic incidents, such as furnish the subjects of < The Shell,' and £ The First Lesson,' in the treatment of which the painter was so peculiarly happy. LESLIE AS AN AKTIST. xlvii My narrowing space warns me to draw this introduc- tion to a close, but before I retire to let Leslie speak for himself, I am tempted to close these desultory notices of particular pictures by some general remarks on the quali- ties of the painter, and on his place among the artists of this country and time. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LESLIE AS AN ARTIST. In passing from the consideration of particular pic- tures of Leslie's to his general characteristics as a painter, I feel distrustful of my own judgment. Mem- ory of the delight which his exhibited pictures have afforded me year after year makes me shrink from the attempt to analyze the sources of my gratification. I feel too grateful to the man who has given his genera- tion so much refined and innocent pleasure, to be dis- posed to scan the " why " and the " how " of his work- ing, or to be sure how much of what I write is present judgment, how much recollected enjoyment. In almost all that Leslie attempted he appears to me to have suc- ceeded in a rare degree. Few painters have better known the range of their own powers, or more honestly fol- lowed the guidance of their real tastes and feelings. But most, even of his warmest admirers, will probably agree with me in the opinion, that he has satisfied us least in the few subjects he has painted from Holy Writ. Not that he wanted reverence, or earnestness, or elevation of sentiment, for such themes. But in the treatment of them we have been accustomed to look either for such epic largeness and simplicity of handling as they have received from the greatest Italians, or for that vivid nat- xlviii INTRODUCTION. uraiism and local colour with which Wilkie dreamed of investing the incidents of Biblical life, and which Ver- net in France, and Mr. H. Holman Hunt and others at home, have actually applied to it. Leslie, by his prac- tice as a painter of cabinet pictures, was unfitted for the one mode of treatment, while his ignorance of Eastern life and nature, if nothing else, debarred him from the other. But even among these subjects there are homely and domestic incidents which Leslie was quite fitted to make both lovely and impressive, as I think he has proved by his Martha and Mary, painted originally in 1847. A third repetition of this subject was among the pictures left unfinished at his death. But Leslie had no vocation for what may be called epic painting, or, indeed, for any form of painting cal- culated by scale and style to speak to numbers. He seems, from passages in his writings, to have underval- ued all that class of work which he considered as merely subsidiary to architecture, but which ought rather to be estimated as originally Bible record, legend, or history, put into pictures for the sake of those who had no books, and afterwards in the stateliest form of decora- tion. He had no ambition to adorn public halls, or to cover the walls of churches. He no doubt thought that the time for giving instruction or information through pictures has passed away, while stately decoration is in- appropriate to our social life and usages — in this coun- try, at least — and that painting now-a-days cannot use- fully aspire to any higher functions than those of pleas- ing and refining. And of all the ways in which the painter can impart pleasure or promote culture, there was evidently none which Leslie valued so highly as his power to enhance our relish for good books, and to enlarge our enjoyment of out-door nature. He wrought in the one field himself: he thoroughly and generously LESLIE AS AN AKTIST. xlix appreciated those who laboured honestly and lovingly in the other. His own art was eminently literary. But he not the less passionately admired Constable's pictures for their single-hearted reproduction of the skies and streams, the downs and meadows, about Dedham and East Bergholt. Both in his appreciation of art and literature, Leslie was eminently catholic, and in the main sound of judg- ment. His lectures testify to the comprehensiveness of his artistic canons, while how keenly and genuinely he loved books is evident in his choice of subjects from first to last. When we recall his pictures, it is in connection with Shakespeare, Cervantes, and Le Sage, Moliere, Addison, Sterne, Fielding, and Smollett. These were the books his father loved, and on such strong and nutri- tious literary food young Leslie was reared. He first attracted notice by his ' Sir Roger de Coverley going to Church ' (1819). ' Sir Roger de Coverley in Church ' (1857),* was the last picture from his hand which re- tained any strong impress of that which most charmed us in him. He has left few works in which subject, as well as embodiment, is of his own imagining. His ' Mayday,' the < Mother and Child,' the < Who can this be ? ' and ' Who can this be from ? ' are the best exam- ples of such pictures. But as an illustrator and pic- torial embodier of other men's conceptions, he ranks among the first — if not as the very first — of English painters. So entirely true and subtle is his rendering of character and expression, so fine his appreciation of his author's sentiment, so hearty his relish for the sub- ject in hand, that his pictures seem to me quite to escape the charge so justly brought against most pic- tures taken from books, that they weaken instead of strengthen our conception and enjoyment of the scene * In the Collection of Mrs. Miller, at Preston. d 1 INTRODUCTION. represented. What painter has entered so completely as Leslie into the mind of Shakespeare and Cervantes, of Moliere and Addison ? His Sancho seems to me absolutely to satisfy one's conception of the burly squire. I should say the same of his Autolycus and Perdita ; his Beatrice and his Catherine ; his Uncle To- by and the Widow Wadman ; his Trissotin and Mon- sieur Jourdain ; and all those saucy, sprightly suivantes of Moliere's comedies — the Nicoles and Toinettes, and Mariannes. In his choice of subjects from his favourite authors, I fancy one may trace the same hearty and intimate appreciation. He does not pick out his inci- dents, only or mainly, because they admit of picturesque costume, effective grouping, or stirring and varied ac- tion, but because they reflect the inner and more subtle sentiment of the play or novel, or poem which furnishes them. It has always seemed to me that our liking and appreciation of the Duchess in Don Quixote must be permanently heightened after we have learned to enjoy her high-bred humour and courteous grace from Leslie's picture of her; after we have caught that radiant but restrained half smile, so exquisitely contrasted with the broad and boisterous merriment of the attendants — the mulatto girl above all — and the bilious contempt on the starched, vinegar face of the Duenna. So, I think, we must all acknowledge an enhanced sense of the humour of Uncle Toby's dangerous tete-a-tete with the Widow Wadman in the sentry-box, after studying the two in Leslie's picture of that critical situation. In selecting the most salient merits of this painter, I am only echoing the general verdict when I pitch first upon his power of rendering character, particularly of the humorous kind. But this power was thoroughly under the guidance of that chastening good taste which can treat even coarse subjects without vulgarity, and LESLIE AS AN ARTIST. li make otherwise odious incidents tolerable by redeeming glimpses of humanity and good feeling. In his " Read- ing of the Will," from Roderick Random (1846), I would note, in illustration of the latter characteristic, the real grief of the little girl at the window — the one person- age in that assembly of sharking fortune-hunters who is thinking of the dead with regret. She is unnoticed by the rest of the characters, and might easily escape obser- vation, so unobtrusively is she introduced. But once seen, she leavens the whole scene with that salt of hu- man kindness, which without her would be wanting, even in presence of the bluff honesty of Lieutenant Bowling, and the innocent unconcern of little Roderick. There are few of the painter's pictures in which he does not contrive to introduce some such touch, to make us love him, and feel kindly towards our kind. Another charm in Leslie's work is the inborn and genuine — if often homely — beauty and grace of his women. Speaking from my own feeling, I should find it difficult to parallel, for this quality, his Perdita in the Sheepshanks picture, or his Beatrice in the Gibbons col- lection. But all his women, even the humblest, have as much beauty as is compatible with their class, charac- ter, and occupation. This beauty never degenerates into the meretricious or the tawdry. It is eminently the real and work-day charm of human flesh and blood, whether it be refined and high-bred as in the Duchess or the la- dies of the " Rape of the Lock ; " or simple and naive as in the Perdita ; or rustic and blowsy as in the Mopsa and Dorcas; or ripe, melting, and provocative as in the Widow Wadman. Closely akin to this sentiment of genuine womanly loveliness, is Leslie's intense feeling for the domesticities. No mother, I should think, can see that little picture of his,* in which a lovely young *In the Collection of Mrs. Gibbons, Regent's Park. lii INTRODUCTION. woman nestles her face in the chubby neck of the crow- ing baby on her knee, without a thrill of maternal love at her heart. But whatever he has done in this way is free from all mawkishness. There is no trading in the " deep domestic," as a good saleable article for the mar- ket. In this, as in all he did, good taste has chastened and checked Leslie's pencil. His lectures show how . highly he valued this guiding and restraining faculty, and his pictures throughout supply the best illustra- tions I know of the faculty in operation. How genuine all these qualities were in Leslie is best shown by his life and by his character, as indicated in his conversation and his writing. How could he be other than truthful, lovely, charitable, and tasteful in his pictures, who in his home as in society, in his teaching as in his conduct, was habitually sincere, affec- tionate, equable, thoughtful of others, tolerant, loving to dwell rather on the good than on the bad about him ? It would be well if there were more lives that should show so exact a parallel of good attributes in the work- man and his works. In going through Leslie's recollections and correspon- dence, I have found myself often drawn to a compari- son of him as a painter with his friend Washington Irving as a writer. I trace a good many points of re- semblance between them, as in the hearty love of both for the nearer past of English life and manners ; their unaffected sensibility to the graceful and refined in wo- man, and tb the domestic affections ; their genial relish for the humourous in character, with a not unkindred appreciation of the pathetic ; their genuine Anglicism of sentiment and spirit — Americans as both were by blood : and lastly, their ever-present good taste in treat- ing every subject they took in hand. It may seem not a very high place in art to claim for Leslie, which sets LESLIE AS AN ARTIST. til) him on a level with Washington Irving in literature. But Leslie loved Irving so well and admired his work so heartily, that I am sure Leslie would not complain of the parallel. I am very imperfectly qualified to pronounce on the technical merits and demerits of Leslie as a painter. I venture what I say on this point subject to the 'correc- tion of better informed judges. It is evident from his works, as well as from what his letters tell us about them, that he wrought his way in his art slowly and la- boriously. His taste, he tells us, was long in forming. He honestly confesses there was a time when he thought West equal to Raffaelle, and when he was insensible to the glory of Venetian colour ; and though by diligent cultivation he tutored his mind and eye to juster appre- ciation, it seems to me clear from his works that he had not by nature the gift of colour, and never quite made up for this want by self-culture. The colour of his ear- lier works is mellower and richer than that of his later ones. Failing sight may have had something to do with this, as well as the influence of Constable ; but it may, also, be partly due to a natural relaxation of effort after alien perfections in one who had succeeded in win- ning public favor by the qualities which were natural to him. From about 1819 to 1838 — judging from the pictures I have had opportunities of examining — Les- lie seems to me to have been at his best as a colourist. His pictures painted after 1838, exhibit an increasing tendency to opacity and chalkiness, though he ever and anon escapes from these besetting sins, and, as in his Beatrice (1850), paints a head as perfect in the softness of its texture, and the pearliness of its tone, as the most exacting critic could require. But making every allowance for such occasional felicities, I fear it must be admitted that Leslie was not d* liv INTRODUCTION. a great colourist, at least if one considers the quality of his tints in themselves, rather than the choice and arrangement of them in combination. This was not for want of honest effort, for no man ever laboured more strenuously, by observation and practice, to repro- duce the true effects of light, or knew better what these ought to be, or more enjoyed them in the works of other masters. De Hooghe, Maas, and the Flemish school generally, were his especial favourites for their mastery in this respect, above all others. And if Leslie's pictures lack the peculiar charm of colour, so they are not marked by any special dexterity of manipulation. There is none of what Hazlitt called "the sword play" of the pencil about them. But against their technical defects we must, I think, set off a rare feeling for so much of atmospheric effect as is indepen- dent of positive colour. Leslie's pictures are full of air ; we can breathe in them and walk about among his groups, and retire into his distances. Of composition he seems to me a master ; quite as happy in the disposition of his personages, and- in their combination with the still life of his scene, as in the ren- dering of character by face and action. As a draughts- man, too, his merit is, unquestionably, of a very high order. Very few painters have made so good a use of the model — getting reality and life from the living sitter, without any sacrifice of the ideal intention of the painter. His pictures, thanks to the thoroughness with which the conception is thought out, are quite free from all suggestion of the masquerade warehouse, or the old furniture shop. He is a thorough master of perspective, and has seldom been exceeded in the taste with which he selects his accessories, and the well considered degree of finish with which he paints them. In this, as in his LESLIE AS AN ARTIST. Iv conceptions of incident and character, guiding good taste is everywhere apparent. In the gradation of their finish, above all, Leslie's pictures should supply valuable lessons to the young painter of the present day. They will help to correct that prevailing tendency to elaborate everything to the utlnost of the painter's power, in disregard of the law that such equality of elaboration may be fitted for stud- ies of parts, but can never be compatible with the con- ditions of a picture regarded as a whole. Leslie's choice of materials and his mode of work, as finally settled, were of that honest kind which postpones immediate effect to permanence, and resists with rare firmness the temptations of the exhibition room. There is no fear of his pictures falling into ruin from his resort to ill considered or reckless means of immediate effect. His method of painting, as it appears from the descrip- tion of it already given, was eminently solid, simple, and straightforward. Leslie's pictures must, I apprehend, be classed among those, works of which the expressional qualities will al- ways in popular estimation overbear the technical ones, and in a great measure render all but artists indifferent to the latter. Had he but united the power of colour and the chiaroscuro of the Flemish school to his own fine humour, refinement, and appreciation of the resources of art, Leslie would have taken a place which still re- mains for his successors to fill up in the hierarchy of painting. In the technical qualities, however, most essential to the rendering of expression, Leslie's art, for most of us, leaves little to desire. I feel confident that when the pictorial art of our time comes to be compared with that which preceded and that which will follow it, Leslie's name must stand Ivi INTRODUCTION. honoured, for the prevailing presence in his works of good taste, truth, character, humour, grace, and kindli- ness, and for the entire absence of that vulgarity, bra- vado, self-seeking, trick, and excess, which are by no means inseparable from great attainments in painting, and which the conditions of modern art are but too apt to engender and to foster. If I have succeeded in my earnest attempt to supply that information about the painter's works, and that es- timate of their qualities, which his native modesty has restrained him from incorporating with his own autobio- graphical recollections, I shall feel that I have paid off a little of the great debt of enjoyment I owe to this charming painter, and most excellent man. 4 LESLIE AS A WRITER ON ART. A.MONG writers on art, I should give Leslie a high place, for the sound sense which guides his judgment, the taste which governs his criticism, and the freedom from one-sidedness shown in his " Handbook for Young Painters," as he modestly called the work into which he re-cast the lectures delivered by him as Professor of Painting in the Royal Academy. There is a great deal in this treatise that many old painters may profitably study and take to heart. The book is anything but am- bitious in its scope or in its style of handling the sub- ject. There is no attempt at systematising, and no pre- tension to exhaustion of its theme. It is rather a col- lection of well-weighed observations on the heads of its several sections, which deal, in succession, with the imitation of nature and style ; the imitation of art ; the LESLIE AS A WRITER ON ART. MI distinction between laws and rules ; classification ; self- teaching ; genius, imagination, and taste ; the ideal and beauty of form ; drawing ; invention and expression ; composition ; colour and chiaroscuro, the cartoons of Raphael ; the Flemish and Dutch painters of the seven- teenth century; landscape and portraits. It seems to me that there has been hardly any book written on the theory of painting which enunciates a larger proportion of sound principles, for its bulk, or one more likely to guide the student safely, so far as it at- tempts to guide him. Were I to select for exception conclusions or opinions from this treatise, they would be those which the author puts forward as to decorative painting, in connection with architecture, on which subject Leslie wrote in ig- norance of the finest examples in this kind, which Italy alone supplies. I think, too, that Leslie undervalued both the historical importance and the expressional qualities of early art ; and that this under-estimate has misled the author in his criticism of the principles that should guide the selection of pictures for our National Gallery. Among examples of artist biography, Leslie's " Life of Constable" deserves, I think, to rank as a model. Affection for his subject may have had as much to do in guiding Leslie through this task, as any theory of editorial duties. But to whatever cause we are to ascribe the result, I know of no more striking example of perfect good taste than Leslie's part in this book. It seems to me difficult to praise too highly the subordina- tion, all through, of the editor to his subject; his indus- try in research ; his arrangement ; the skill with which he has left the subject of the biography to tell his own story in letters judiciously chosen and carefully linked by brief explanatory statements ; the simple earnestness Iviii INTRODUCTION. with which the editor has conveyed his admiration and affection for the subject of his memoir, till he creates a Kindred feeling in those who read what he has written. It may be the consciousness of my own difficulties and shortcomings in attempts of the same kind, that makes me so sensible of Leslie's editorial merits. The good taste and good feeling so conspicuous in his " Life of Constable," are equally apparent, I think, in the Autobiography, from which I have but too long detained the reader. AUTOBIOGEAPHY OP CHARLES ROBERT LESLIE. CHAPTER I. Voyage to America — Engagement at sea — French ship vanquished — Youth- ful bravery — The Newfoundland dog — Residence at Lisbon — Departure from Lisbon — Arrival at Philadelphia. In looking back on the opportunities my profession has given me of knowing many persons whose names will outlive the pres- ent age, I cannot doubt that much which has interested me will be read with interest by others. Without the hope that I can do justice, in my relation, to what I have seen and heard, I am yet tempted to commit to paper those of my recollections on which I dwell with the most interest, and to connect with them some account of my life. My father, Robert Leslie, and my mother, Lydia Baker, were Americans, natives of Cecil county in the state of Maryland. Their forefathers had settled in that neighbourhood early in the last century as farmers ; my father's ancestors being from Scot- land, and my mother's from England. My father was a man of extraordinary ingenuity in mechanics. He settled in Philadelphia in the year 1786, as a clock and watchmaker, having previously pursued that business at Elktown. He was a member of the Philosophical Society, and was known and respected by some of the most eminent scientific men in America, among whom I well recollect Latrobe, the architect of the Capitol at Washington. His business having become pros- perous, he determined to extend it by taking a partner in Phila- 1 2 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. I. delphia, and by going himself to London to purchase the clocks and watches wanted for the establishment. This he did about the year 1793. He was accompanied by his family, which con- sisted of my mother and three young children (girls), and his sister, Margaret Leslie. I was born in London on the 19th October, 1794, and my first recollections are of our living in a house in Portman Place, Edge- ware Road, two doors from that which I occupied after an inter- val of thirty years. My brother, the youngest of my father's children, and about two years younger than myself, was also born in London. On the death of my father's partner, Mr. Price, he returned to America with his family. Our voyage was a remarkable one ; and, as my father kept a journal, and as I have been favoured, within these few years, with a sight of another kept by one of our fellow passengers, Mr. Lawrence Greatrakes, I am enabled to give some account of the principal events of it. We sailed, on the 18th September, 1799, from Gravesend, in the ship Washington, 875 tons burthen, carrying sixteen 24- pounders (carronades), six long twelves, and two 6-pounders. She was an English-built East Indiaman, but when we sailed in her she was in the American merchant service, and armed in consequence of the war between the United States and France. She had a complement of sixty-two men and boys, and was commanded by Captain James Williamson, a Scotchman. Mr. Greatrakes remarks, that " Perhaps few instances ever occurred of a vessel suffering greater difficulties, and not being lost, in endeavouring to beat out of the Channel." And my father says : " We were only just clear of the land when we had been thirty- four days on board. " On the 23rd October we passed through an English fleet from the Mediterranean, and were brought to by the largest of the ships — the Majestic, 74. The gun she fired as a signal had. by the carelessness of the gunner, a ball in it, which came on board of us, and, passing very near the heads of two of our pas- sengers, sunk into a spar on the deck. " On Thursday, the 24th," continues my father, " we were called up by the mate and gunner, who informed us that there CHAP. I.] VOYAGE TO AMERICA. 3 was a French ship in sight, and that we must prepare for an engagement. As soon as I got on deck, the captain requested me to get Mrs. Leslie and the children up and dressed, as he wished to have them ready to go below at a minute's warning. We were steering west, with the wind right aft, and the French- man following us at the distance of about four miles. It was, no doubt, a ship we had seen the evening before, dogging the fleet we had passed through, probably in the hope of cutting one or two of them off. He did not seem to be gaining on us, so that, at eight, we had breakfast as usual, soon after which we found that our enemy could keep up with us with less sail than we had, by which it was evident he could overtake us if he pleased. Our captain determined, therefore, to slacken sail, and have our fate decided while we had the day before us." Mr. Greatrakes says : " The orders to clear for action were productive of some droll scenes. Great was the confusion pro- duced among the passengers — some half-asleep, some only half- dressed, running every way but the right one, and carrying their moveables everywhere but where they should ; bemoaning their unhappy lot in coming to sea in time of war ; rolling up their bedding, and tumbling their trunks down the orlop deck stairs ; and some of them tumbling themselves after them ; inquiring of every one whom they judged in the least likely to know, whether it would be a hard fight ; whether the French would take all the passengers' property ; whether they should be put into prison ; whether they should ever get home; &c, &c." To return to my father's journal : " At half-past nine we had everything in readiness, and every man to his station : the guns all primed, the matches lit, and all the women and children ordered down into the hold. . . . At a quarter before ten the Frenchman fired one gun, though at too great a distance to reach us. In five minutes more they were near enough, when our captain fired our first gun with his own hand, it being one that stood on the quarter-deck ; the men gave three cheers, and the action commenced very briskly on both sides, the two ships being near enough to use muskets and have a distinct view of each other. The French ship appeared new, and in every respect like a frigate, except in size. Their musket-balls for a 4 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap, l few minutes were sent so rapidly against the side of our ship, that the noise to us was like a hail-storm against a window, and yet we had not a man killed by them. One grazed our steward's neck, and another went through the fleshy part of a man's arm. No muskets were fired from our ship, except by some of the pas- sengers, as our men were all required to work our heavy guns ; in which we were, in one respect, very unfortunate, as almost every one of the 24-pounders that was fired tumbled over. I counted at one time five of them lying on their sides on the gun-deck. The carriages were made on a new patent plan, but so high and narrow that they could not bear the recoil. One of them in falling broke the leg of our carpenter. The two ships were but for a few minutes near enough to use muskets ; after which some of the passengers who had been engaged with them went to assist in making wads and handing cartridges, and the rest went below. The action was now continued with the cannon on both sides ; ours were pointed at the hull of the enemy, and we saw the effects of them in several places. They generally aimed at our rigging with double-headed shot, grape-shot, large spike nails, bars of iron from six to twelve inches long, and some of them an inch square, which did much damage to our sails and ropes. At eleven o'clock the privateer steered off, to our great joy,' as almost all our cartridges were gone, most of our 24-pounders dismounted, and our crew much fatigued. We had lost, however, but one man, who was hit by a grape-shot through the head, and died instantly. " It was the opinion of our captain, that the enemy had gone only to repair some of her damages, and meant to attack us again. After some grog, therefore, all hands went to work mak- ing cartridges, wads, &c, and getting the guns in their places ; and rather before all was ready, we saw the Frenchman bearing • down on us a second time, though not so fast but that we were enabled to be quite prepared before he came near. " They began to fire at a great distance ; but our captain ordered his men not to fire till they were close to us, and then as fast as possible with the 24-pounders. At a quarter past one we commenced the second action, with more vigour on our part than the first. The men were so eager to despatch the business, CHAP. I.] FRENCH SHIP VANQUISHED. 5 that they charged the guns with a 24-pound ball and two double- headed shot. The French, as before, aimed at our rigging, and we at their hull, which our 24-pounders damaged very much; four of them were seen to go through her on one side below the wale, and another stove in the whole of her gangway. At a few minutes before two o'clock she sheered off, and did not return, leaving us with our rigging terribly damaged : our main- mast shot through in four places, the mizen top-sail yard in one, and the cross jack-yard cut in two in the middle ; one ball through the fore-top mast, and nearly half the shrouds and stays of the ship cut away. Most of the braces were gone ; and the mizen stay-sail, the smallest we had up, had thirty holes in it, the main-sail sixty-two, and the others in the same proportion: yet in the last action not a man was either killed or wounded. " At three o'clock the French ship was so far off that we had no expectation of her return ; when the captain told me I might get my family up from where they had been confined for more than five hours, with very little air, and the light of only one lanthorn. At four the privateer was nearly out of sight, and we sat down to dine on a large boiled ham, which the cook had got done for us, notwithstanding all the bustle. The men had at the same time their usual fare, to which the captain added two cheeses and an extra allowance of grog. Thus ended the busy part of the day; and, although we had beaten off our enemy, the evening prospect was but a gloomy one. Our deck was as black as the sides of the ship with the quantity of powder that had been burnt on it, and was covered with ropes, blocks, pieces of masts, yards, &c, balls, shot, and spike-nails.* We had only four rags of sails up, and were not able to manage them for want of braces. Night coming on, put it out of our power to do any- thing but let the ship drift before the wind, which was east. "The evening was closed by bringing up on deck the man that had been killed, sewn up in canvas, with a cannon-ball at his feet. He was laid on the deck ; the company stood round while one of the passengers read prayers over him, and he was then lowered gently into the sea. The name of this young man was * I remember hearing my father say, that he found the iron of an old patten sticking in the side of the ship. 6 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [chap. I. Samuel Reed ; he was a good sailor, and had been with Trux ton when he took a French frigate, and afterwards in the ship Planta when she beat off a French privateer in the Channel in the early part of the summer." Mr. Greatrakes says : " During the action a circumstance oc- curred that showed the character of our captain. A wad from one of the Frenchman's 32-pound carronades struck the^ star- board quarter-rail and flew back, spinning round with great veloc- ity. He instantly attempted to jump on it and stop it, almost pushing me down to get it. Then tearing and cutting it to pieces, he charged the larboard 6-pounder several times, and, stuffing the fragments of the wad into it, fired it back again at the Frenchman, swearing bitterly at the whole nation all the time.* " Two boys, from thirteen to fifteen years of age, got a stroke or two from the first officer for dancing hornpipes on the main- deck during the heaviest part of both ships' fire. Another boy, in carrying forward a 24-pound cartridge, had it shot away from his hands. ' There,' said he, with an oath directed to the French- man, ' you , now I must go back for another.' In the early part of the action our colours were shot down, when our third mate, Mr. Thomas (an Irishman) and our little steward emu- lously contended for the honour of first mounting the poop, to nail them to the mizen-mast, in the midst of a most heavy fire of musketry. Thomas succeeded in getting the fallen colours and nailing them up, though they were shot through several times while he was doing it, and two geese were killed in the coop on which he stood. A young American gentleman, named Wallraven, distinguished himself by his gallantry, and was pub- licly thanked by the captain after the action." Of such of the occurrences of this eventful day as were most calculated to make an impression on the mind of a child of five * Young as I was, I can recall to mind the figure of Captain Williamson. He was a well-formed, strong-made man, of a good height, but not tall. On this occasion he wore a kind of naval uniform, a hanger at his side, and a belt round his waist, in which were stuck a pair of pistols. From what will be related, he seemed (like Dr. Johnson), to consider one Englishman a match for four Frenchmen ; and with Englishmen he no doubt classed Americans, as well as Scotchmen. CHAP. I.] THE NEWFOUNDLAND DOG. 7 years of age, I have a tolerable recollection. I had often before looked with awe down the hatches into the gloomy region in which we were confined during the battle, and had seen indis- tinctly the upright post with notches in it for the feet, by which we children were carried down. My wonder and admiration were now excited by the steward, who seemed to me almost to fly up and down this post by the help of the hand-rope, his fre- quent visits having no other object than to see that we were as comfortable as circumstances permitted, to tell us all the best news from the decks, and to bring us reinforcements of ginger- bread, oranges, and wine. All my notions of war were associated with the then popular piece of music, the " Battle of Prague," which I had heard my eldest sister play on the piano ; and, accordingly, when I heard the groans of the poor man whose leg was crushed, and who was brought somewhere near us, I exclaimed, " There are the cries of the wounded." The burial of the man who was killed made a deep impression on me, for I saw his messmates carry him to the bow of the ship, and I could distinctly trace the human form through the white canvas in which it was tightly sewn up ; and this — to me, the first — image of death, has never been effaced fr,om my recollection. Often as children are frightened without cause, they are as often in moments of real danger less alarmed than their elders ; and I, though constitutionally timid, have no recollection of being terrified by what was going on, perhaps because I believed the hold to be a place of perfect safety. I remember that my brother and I amused ourselves for a great part of the time with playing at hide and seek among the water-casks, with some of the other children of the passengers. My brother, indeed, who was more heroic than I, wanted a little pistol, that he might go on deck and shoot the "naughty Frenchmen." My two elder sisters were of an age to understand and feel alarmed for our situa- tion, and my youngest sister was dangerously ill with an attack of pleurisy, and in that state taken out of bed and carried below. What must my poor mother have suffered ! The captain had a very fine Newfoundland dog, named Nero, who was always greatly excited by the firing of guns. During 8 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [chap. I. the engagement, he was so much in the way of the sailors, run- ning from one end of the ship to the other, jumping on the guns and barking, that either by chance or design he was thrown down a hatchway, and his leg broken by the Ml. The poor animal became so restless, and his howls were so distressing, that my father, having fastened a rope to his collar, carried him to a part of the hold as far as possible from that which we occupied, and while endeavouring to find some means of securing him, he found one of the passengers sitting alone and quite in the dark. My father asked him to hold the dog, but receiving no answer, he placed the rope in his hand, but it was cold and trembling, and incapable of retaining it. The broken leg was probably not the worst hurt poor Nero received by his fall, for he died a few days afterwards, greatly regretted by his master, who gratified him, in his last moments, by firing a pistol over him ; a favour Nero acknowledged by slightly moving his tail, and making a faint attempt to bark. Some of these particulars have probably remained with me from hearing my father and others of the family mention them after our arrival in America, rather than from my own recol- lection. Mr. Greatrakes relates that — " As our damages were too great to be repaired at sea, and the wind was unfavourable either for England or Ireland, the captain determined to go to Lisbon to refit, from whence we were about 500 miles distant. "On the 26th, another privateer, a brig, appeared in sight with all sails set to overtake us; probably supposing, from our shattered condition, she would find us an easy prey. She came up with us towards evening, and our captain determined to sink her, which his weight of metal enabled him to do. Luckily for her, however, a shot fired prematurely reached her, and she took French leave as quickly as possible. " On the 30th we took a Lisbon pilot, who came on board with a cocked hat and a high plume of red feathers, laced ruffles to his shirt, and a sword by his side.* * The house in which we passed our " Winter in Lisbon," had been built purposely for the accommodation of lodgers. It was four stories high. On each story were two complete and distinct suites of rooms; each suite com- CHAP. I.] EESIDENCE AT LISBON. 9 "The repairs of the ship detained us at Lisbon five months and two days, though the carpenter had engaged to send us to prising a very large parlour or drawing-room, four chambers, and a kitchen. Our family occupied a set of apartments on the second story or first-floor. The adjoining set was rented by a Portuguese fidalgo who held a small place under the government, and with his wife, sister, and chikhen, led a life of pre- tension and poverty, show and dirt. All the rooms, except the kitchens, were built entirely without fire-places, or any means of heating them except by the occasional introduction of a brazier of charcoal, in which case it was of course imperative to sit with a door or window open. And even then, the fumes pro- duced such headaches that we thought it better to endure the cold. In the south of Europe, the lamentable scarcity of fuel is a serious drawback to any pleasure that may be derived from passing a winter in those countries. The houses are built as if for perpetual summer. Though during the whole winter there was no snow that lay on the ground, and no ice thicker than a shilling, we had several weeks of almost incessant rain, accompanied by cold, driving winds; and afterwards occasional rain-storms of three or four days. And such rains! a whole cloud seemed to descend at once. The streets (fortunately for them) were so flooded that at times they looked as if cataracts were rushing down between the two rows of houses. But it washed them clean. Our door- windows fitted so badly, that the rain poured in at them through all sorts of crevices and open places ; so that, at each of the thi-ee, large tubs had to be placed to catch the water that would otherwise have deluged .the floor. After the first rain, however, my father contrived means to stop up these cracks, so as to render the in-pouring less violent. But the dampness that pervaded the house, and all other bouses in this tireless country, was without remedy. The shoes that we took off at night were frequently in the morning found covered with blue mould. So also were the surbases, and the frames of the chairs and tables. Our clothes became mouldy in the bureaus and presses ; the covers and edges of our books were frequently coated with mould in a single night. To guard against the effects of this humid atmosphere, which there was no fire to coun- teract, we had recourse to many strange expedients. Every morning, on rising, we dressed ourselves as if we were going to spend the day in the street; put- ting on as many under garments as we could, and finishing with our pelisses or outside coats, and fur tippets. We wore our bonnets all day long; and my sisters and myself rejoiced in cottage beavers, tied in closely to our faces. My father (always in his great coat) likewise kept on his hat, and the two boys were made to keep on theirs. Several days were really so cold, as well as damp, that after breakfast we all went regularly to bed; remaining there the whole day, except at meal-times. This we found a tolerably good plan, and 1 liked it very well, as I could then give myself up entirely to reading. One of the amusements of the juvenile part of the family, when our parents were not present (with shame I speak of it), was to peep through the keyhole, with a desire to be enlightened as to the manners and customs of the Portuguese peo- ple who occupied the adjoining suite of apartments; a door, always locked, being between their drawing-room and ours. We would not have acted so dis- honourably towards persons of our own country, or even to British neighbours ; but we regarded the Portuguese as "no rule." We soon ascertained that 10 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [CHAP. I> sea in six weeks, or two months at the farthest. The expense was £12,000 sterling, with a deduction of £2000 for old mate- rials. their general habiliments were old and slovenly, but that whenever a fine day tempted the lady-wife to walk out, she covered her dirty dark calico dress with an elegant blue satin cloak trimmed with ermine ; and had a barber to come and dress her hair, and decorate it with embroidered ribbons ; bonnets not yet being introduced into Portugal. Keeping no regular servant, she, for these occasions, hired, by the hour, two maids to walk after her. When any of her female friends came to visit our neighbour, they also brought their maids -with them; and while the mistresses were conversing on the sofa, the maids sat flat on the floor in front of them, and kept up a whispering talk with each other. Among other items of keyhole knowledge, we discovered that every day, about dinner-time, our neighbours had a table set out in their parlour with clean damask cloth and napkins, pieces of bread, silver forks, spoons, castors, &c; handsome wine-glasses, and goblets, and all the paraphernalia of a very genteel dinner equipage. The table stood thus during an hour or more; so that if vis- itors came in, they might suppose that the family were preparing to sit down in style comme il faut. But to this table they never did sit down; for when the time of exhibition had elapsed, all the fine things were taken off and carefully put away for a similar show the next day, and the next. Meanwhile (as we found by reconnoitring through the kitchen keyhole) the Portuguese family all assembled in the place where their food was cooked; seated themselves on the floor round a large earthen pan filled with some sort of stew; and each dipped in a pewter spoon and fed out of that same pan. Our house was supplied with milk in the usual Portuguese fashion ; the fashion at least of that time. A dirty old man with a red woollen cap on his head, and round his ragged jacket a red woollen sash, to which hung several tin cups of various measures, drove before him a cow, two she-asses, and three or four goats, stopping to milk them at the doors of his customers, who thus had their choice of cow's milk, ass's milk, or goat's milk. The two last milks are considered good for invalids; English people of that unfortunate class being then in the habit of resorting to Lisbon for the improvement of their health. They have grown wiser since the whole European continent has been opened to them. Our milkman, like all other Portuguese, took snuff a loutrance ; always stopping to regale himself with a pinch more than once during the process of milking into the tin mug, and then resuming with his snuffy fingers. A remonstrance from the person who stood at the door to take the milk so offended his Portuguese dignity, that he immediately drove off his beasts in high dudgeon, and there was no milk that day. Next morning, when he was caught with some difficulty as he passed grandly by, it required considerable coaxing and apologising, and many promises of future good behaviour, to prevail on him to stop, and supply milk as usual. The fashion of knee-breeches, cocked hats, and hair tied and pow- dered, was retained by the Portuguese long after that style became obsolete in all other parts of the world. With their long and ample cloaks, there was no need of wasting money on good clothes to wear underneath; and linen was rarely discerned about their necks, for very good reasons. A large house was building next door to ours. Immediately in front, the street was chiefly occu- CHAP. I.] EESIDENCE AT LISBON. 11 " While we were at Lisbon we heard from the American con- sul at Corunna, of the privateer we had been engaged with. pied by a wide deep slough or mud-hole, where the paving-stones had sunk or died away; and the councilmen, or aldermen, or selectmen (if there are any such persons in Lisbon) had taken no account of it. When the weather was uncommonly bad, the carts that brought stone for the building generally stuck fast in this capacious hole. The Lisbon carts were of very primitive structure. They had no close sides; neither had they iron stanchions like those of drays to keep things from falling; there were only a few crooked sticks, stuck in here and there along the edges. Though wood is so scarce in Portugal, there was a great waste of it in the wheels, which had no spokes, but were solid and massy, like grindstones; and the axle-tree revolved with them, groaning, or rather, shrieking dismally all the time. These carts were drawn by a pair of oxen, which it always required two men to urge along. The dress of these carmen began by cocked hats, and powdered hair tastefully queued withblue or pink ribbons; cotton velvet jackets with tarnished, tinsel-looking orna- ments; faded breeches open at the knees; and their bare Portuguese legs ended, as usual, in old shoes with large showy buckles. Each driver carried a goad, and when the cart-load of stone got into the slough, while one man goaded the oxen, shouting violently something that sounded like the other went to their heads, and endeavoured to frighten the poor beasts out of the mud-hole by making ferocious faces at them, and shrilling also in a loud voice, and brandishing his stick threateningly. The workmen came out of the house to assist in this enterprise of extricating the cart ; and they always had to do at the end what they should have done at the beginning, — unload it of the slabs of stone ; after which, the oxen and the empty cart were generally shahed out of the hole in less than half-an-hour. Among the sights of Lisbon streets, those that have a taste for such things may be treated daily with the gratuitous view of a pig-killing. If a man is driving a pig, and the animal seems to have more than his usual disinclination to " go a-head," the driver, to cut short all further argument, stops in the open street, takes out his knife, and deliberately kills the pig. Then, getting some dry furze from the nearest shop, he makes a fire in the street, singes and scrapes the animal, removes the inside, and carries the carcase home on his shoulder, all ready for selling or cooking. The Portuguese pork is the finest in the world: being fattened on chestnuts and sweet acorns. This food gives a peculiar sweetness and delicacy to the meat, the fat of which is as mild as cream. The beef is far from good ; and there is a law against killing calves; it being thought better they should live and grow up into larger and more profitable animals. Nevertheless, mys- terious men came sometimes to our house, and with many and solemn injunc- tions to secrecy, produced from under their cloaks a piece of veal, for which they asked an enormous price as an indemnification to their consciences for having violated the law. Kids are much eaten in Portugal; but it is not alto- gether safe to venture on one, unless you are quite sure that it is not a cat. I am still uneasy with a misgiving, that, at a table not our own, I did eat a slice of grimalkin kid ; and I can never be quite certain that I did not. I must say, however, that whether of the feline species or not, it looked and tasted well. Among the country people that came into market, were the wine-sellers, 12 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. I. She was called La Bellone, of Bordeaux, a beautiful new ship, mounting twenty-six brass twelves and four thirty-two pound carronades. She was a very SAvift sailer, and had, when she left port, 275 men; but. when she engaged us her complement was 240, having put the others on board a British prize. We killed thirty-seven and wounded fifty-eight, and when she got to Co- runna, she had four and a half feet water in the hold." These particulars are confirmed by my father's journal, with the excep- tion of the number of men killed, which he states at thirty.* " On the 31st of March," says Mr. Greatrakes, " we left Lis- bon, and the same day we carried away our new fore top-mast in a gale, and the next morning though the wind had subsided suddenly, it. left such a deep trenching sea that the ship rolled in the most dreadful manner, and about 11 o'clock our new main top-mast was rolled over-board, with a man and a boy on it. The man was killed, but the boy saved himself by catching in the shrouds, though he was severely wounded. " On the 3rd April, while all hands were busily employed in clearing the wreck of the two masts, at five, p.m., we saw a sail to windward, appearing like a ship of war. We could not make sail from her, if we would, and our captain now pronounced her a frigate, and declared his intention of fighting her, should she prove to be an enemy. We cleared for action, and at six we could see her hull, but no colours; at half-past six we were ready, and could now discern her hoisting colours, but it was too dark to see what they were. At seven she shot across our bows, within pistol-shot, matches lighted, and every gun with lanthorns, as were ours. At this moment a perfect silence reigned in both ships ; not a whisper w r as to be heard in our own. We were incapable of preventing her from lying on us in any situation she might choose, and her taking this very formidable one of crossing our bows alarmed us much, as she might in passing, being higher than ourselves, have raked us each carrying on his back a borachio or goat-skin, distended with new wine, the forelegs being brought round the neck of the man and tied together in front. Such were the wine-skins that Don Quixote attacked with his sword, mistaking them for an army of soldiers. — 11 Recollections of Lisbon" by Miss Leslie. * The remainder of my father's journal has unfortunately been lost. CHAP. I.] ARRIVAL AT PHILADELPHIA. 13 dreadfully. We now concluded she was an enemy, and respi- ration seemed almost to cease among us for a few seconds, ex- pecting her fire. She, however, swiftly crossed our bows from starboard to larboard, and wearing round, as if animated by an instinctive spirit, laid herself alongside of us at about twenty yards' distance. In this manoeuvre was fully exhibited the great skill and discipline of British seamen, and all was done in profound silence. She hailed us in English, a language at this moment peculiarly musical to our ears, and she proved to be the Sea Horse, a 38-gun frigate, most gallantly manned and homeward- bound from a cruise.* " On the 11th May we arrived at Philadelphia, forty-two days from Lisbon, and seven months and twenty-six days from Lon- don." My father now found himself obliged to engage in a lawsuit with the executors of his deceased partner, who had greatly mis- managed the business. The lawsuit turned out tedious and ex- pensive, and before it was decided my father, whose health had been long declining, died, after a confinement to his room of one week. This was in 1804. I was too young to feel how much we all lost in him. He was a most kind parent, and I cannot now recol- lect that I ever had an angry word from him, though I can re- member many indulgences and gratifications which he afforded to my sisters, my brother, and myself, at an expense of time and trouble, of which we were then little aware. The retrospect con- vinces me that his chief happiness consisted in making his chil- dren happy, as well as his wife, between whom and himself I can remember nothing but entire harmony and affection. The only recollections of my father that are painful, are of his ill-health. I cannot recall to mind a single day in which he seemed quite well ; and his disorders must have been greatly aggravated by his pecuniary embarrassments during the last years of his life. Among his most intimate friends, I remember the leading phy- * It may seem incredible that the captain of our ship should have thought of fighting a frigate, disabled as he was; but he assuredly did so, for I distinctly remember, when we came up from the hold, seeing our sailors all ranged at their guns with lighted matches, and I can, therefore, vouch for the veracity of Mr. Greatrakes. 14 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. i. sicians of Philadelphia — Doctors Rush, Barton, Whistar, Phy- sick, and Mease. He had also known Franklin, and among his daily associates were Charles Wilson Peale, and Oliver Evans, two men of great ingenuity — the first in many ways, the last as an engineer. That a man, without any advantages of education, should have lived constantly in such society; proves that he pos- sessed no ordinary mind. His reading was, probably, not exten- sive ; but I remember that, after Shakespeare, his favourite au- thors were Addison, Pope, Fielding, Sterne, and Goldsmith. He made a small collection of engravings in England, and " Hogarth's Apprentices " were among the number. CHAPTER II. Desire to be a painter — George Frederick Cooke — Departure for England — New acquaintances — Visits to the theatre — Allston and Coleridge — Visit to Clifton — Obtain the Academy medals — Fuseli and Westmacott — Visit to Paris — Coleridge's lectures on Shakespeare — Fragments of Coleridge — Coleridge at Highgate — Charles and Mary Lamb. At my father's death there was so little property left that my mother was obliged to open a boarding-house, and my eldest sister to teach drawing to support the family. My brother and I had been sent to school at the University of Pennsylvania, which then occupied a splendid house in Ninth-street, built by the citizens of Philadelphia to present to General Washington, but which the removal of the seat of government from that city prevented his occupying. It would not have been in the power of my mother to continue sending us to this school, but for the kindness of Dr. Rogers, the English professor, a Baptist minister, who, abated considerably in his charge for our tuition, and Mr. Robert Petterson, the profes- sor of mathematics, who, having known my father intimately, made no charge whatever. I am sorry to say, however, I did not appreciate this liberality as I ought to have done, but neg- lected the study of mathematics as much as I possibly could. My summers and autumns were at this period regularly spent in visits to my great uncles, Philip Ward and George Hall, with my eldest sister, Eliza, and my kind aunt, Margaret Leslie (my father's sister). These uncles lived in Chester county, and were farmers. The scenery about Mr. Ward's house was very beauti- ful, the Brandy wine creek ran near it, and one of' its tributary streams turned a flour-mill and a saw-mill belonging to my uncle. I shall never forget the kindness I received from my worthy rela- tives, while under their roofs. Their habits were simple and 16 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [CHAP. II. rustic. My uncle Hall performed all the work of his little farm himself ; but then, he belonged to a volunteer corps of cavalry ; indeed, he had served in the revolutionary war, and his horse- man's boots, cap, sword, and his blue coat with red facings, which I saw hanging up in his bed-room, though they never happened to be worn during our visits, gave him great importance in my eyes. At Mr. Ward's, one of his sons was the working miller, and the other the farmer, and here I became familiar with all the operations of both mill and farm. I accompanied my cousin Tommy Ward in the fields when he was ploughing or sowing, and in the barn when he was thrashing or winnowing the corn, and I well remember a grand husking party (or " frolic," as it was called), when the neighbours for miles round came to assist in stripping the Indian corn of its outer covering, and afterwards sat down to a most substantial supper. To the imagery treasured in my recollection of these simple scenes, I believe I owe much of the exquisite enjoyment I receive from reading the poetry of Burns. His " Hallowe'en," his " Twa Dogs," and other poems, in which the labours and enjoyments of the cottage are described, always transport me to the log-houses of my kind-hearted uncles and aunts in Chester county. From my infancy* I had been fond of drawing, and when old enough to think of a profession, I wished to be a painter. But my mother had no means of giving me a painter's education, though 1 believe she thought at one time of placing me with an engraver. This notion was however abandoned, and in the year 1808 I was bound apprentice to Messrs. Bradford and Inskeep, Booksellers. Samuel T. Bradford, the senior partner, was at that time the most enterprising publisher in Philadelphia. While I was under his care he treated me with the kindness of a father, but was strict in exacting from me attention to business. If lie found me drawing when I should have been otherwise engaged, he shook his head and seemed so much displeased, that the most distant hope of his ever assisting me to become a painter never entered my mind. The circumstance which changed his opinion and fixed my destiny grew out of the arrival in America of the celebrated actor, George Frederick Cooke. The excitement pro- duced among play-going people on his first appearance in Phila- CHAP. II.] GEORGE FREDERICK COOKE. 17 delphia was most extraordinary. — He was to play Richard on a Monday night, and on the Sunday evening the steps of the theatre were covered with groups of porters, and other men of the lower orders, prepared to spend the night there, that they might have the first chance of taking places in the boxes. I saw some of them take their hats off and put on nightcaps. At ten o'clock the next morning the door was opened to them, and at that time the street in front of the theatre was impassable. When the rush took place, I saw a man spring up and catch hold of the iron which supported a lamp on one side of the door, by which he raised himself so as to run over the heads of the crowd into the theatre. Some of these fellows were hired by gentlemen to secure places, and others took boxes on speculation, sure of selling them at double or treble the regular prices. When the time came for opening the doors in the evening, the crowd was so tumultuous that it was evident there was little certainty that the holders of box-tickets would obtain their places, and for ladies the attempt would be dangerous. A placard was therefore displayed, stating, that all persons who had tickets would be admitted at the stage door before the front doors were opened. This notice soon drew such a crowd to the back of the theatre, that when Cooke arrived he could not get in. He was on foot, with Dunlap, one of the New York managers, and he was obliged to make himself known before he could be got through the press. " I am like the man going to be hanged," he said, " who told the crowd they would have no fun unless they made way for him." I should have had little chance of seeing him that night but for a friend in the theatre, Tom Reinagle, a lad of my own age, and one of the assistant scene painters. He obtained me a place in the flies, as a kind of gallery just over the stage is called, and from that eminence I first saw George Frederick Cooke, the best Richard since Garrick, and who has not been surpassed even by Edmund Kean. Cooke had seen Garrick, and no doubt this was much to his advantage. The other characters in which I saw him were Lear, Shy- lock, Falstaff, Iago, Sir Giles Overreach, Sir Pertinax Mac Sycophant, and Sir Archy Mac Sarcasm ; and I have a perfect recollection of him in all. I thought Edmund Kean inferior 2 18 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. II. to him in Lear, but in Sir Giles Overreach superior, particu- larly in the last scene. I was told by Bannister that Cooke's Fahtaff was much below Henderson's, but it certainly was above any other Fahtaff I ever saw ; and his Mac Sycophant and Mac Sarcasm were perfection. I think of him always with particular interest, not only as one of the very few really great tragic actors I have seen, but as the cause of my coming to England. I dined once in company with him at the fish-house on the banks of the Schuylkill, with a club of gentlemen who, in the summer months, resorted there to fish. Cooke's manners, when sober, were perfect, and I came away before he got drunk. % I had served three years of my time at the bookselling busi- ness when a likeness which I made of Cooke attracted the atten- tion of some of my friends, and Mr. Bradford became of opinion that I might succeed as an artist. From that moment he en- couraged my attempts at drawing, as much as he had before discouraged them. Mr. Clibborn, an Irish gentleman, and a friend of Mr. Bradford, who had often honoured me with his notice while I was behind the counter, carried the sketch of Cooke to the Exchange Coffee House at the hour when it was most frequented by the merchants ; the attempt was thought surprising for a. boy, and in a few hours my feme was spread among the wealthiest men in the city. Mr. Bradford therefore found no difficulty in raising a fund by subscription, to which he contributed liberally himself, sufficient to enable me to study painting two years in Europe. As to the little likeness of Cooke, there was nothing very wonderful in it, I had studied over and over again the pic- tures in Peale's Museum, having had access to it at all times, in consequence of the intimacy between my father and the very ingenious proprietor. I was not acquainted with Mr. Sully, the best painter in Philadelphia, but I never passed his door with- out running up into his show-room (which was at all times accessible), and spending as much time there as I had to spare. The windows of the print-shops were also so many academies to me, and often detained me so long when I was sent on errands, that I was obliged, on leaving them, to run as fast as CHAP. II.] DEPARTURE FOR ENGLAND. 10 possible to make up for lost time. When all this is consid- ered, and also that I took an uncommon interest (even for a boy) in everything relating to the stage, and that I shared fully in the excitement produced by the arrival of such an actor as Cooke in America, it would, I think, have been more surpris- ing had I failed in the attempt to make a likeness of him from recollection, than that I should, to a certain degree, have suc- ceeded. Luckily, however, for me, my drawing was thought wonder- ful ; and my liberal friend, Mr. Bradford, determined to send me to England, under the care of his partner and brother-in-law, Mr. Inskeep, who was about to sail for London on business. Before I left Philadelphia, Mr. Sully, with whom I had be- come acquainted, gave me the first lesson I received in oil- painting. He began a copy of a picture in my presence, and then put his palette and brushes into my hand, telling me to proceed in the same way with a copy of my own. The next day he carried his work further, and I again followed him, and so on, until the copies were both finished ; thus explaining to me at once the processes of scumbling, glazing, &c. Sully gave me letters to Mr. West, Sir William Beechey, Mr. Charles King, and other artists; and thus provided, I sailed from New York on the 11th of November, 1811, and, after a short and pleasant passage, arrived at Liverpool on the 3rd of December. Notwithstanding the gloomy season of the year, I entered London with such feelings as we can experience, per- haps, but once in our lives. It was my birth-place, and my earliest recollections belonged to it. I had a kind of dreamy remembrance of the magnificence of St. Paul's, and the splen- dour of the Lord Mayor's show. The novels of Miss Burney, and the "Picture of London," had made me acquainted with its chief objects of interest, and I had often amused myself with tracing its localities on the maps. Familiar with the engraved works of Hogarth, the very purlieus of St. Giles's, from whence his backgrounds are so frequently taken, possessed to my im- agination the charm of classic ground. For the last three years I had enjoyed opportunities of see- ing all the most interesting books as they arrived from England 20 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [chap. II. in the bloom of novelty. The talk of the literary men who frequented Mr. Bradford's shop, was often of London and its wonders. I knew the names and styles of the principal English artists from the many engravings I had opportunities of seeing. Passionately fond of the theatre, I knew that Kemble, Mrs. Sid- dons, Mrs. Jordan, Bannister, Dowton, and Munden were still on the stage; and I had heard of Liston, Matthews, and Emery, who were then in the meridian of their glory. I had seen one of the finest of West's pictures (his "Lear in the Storm"), and I was to see and know the great artist himself. All this to a boy of sixteen, and of such tastes as I have described, could not but afford anticipations of the most intoxicating delight. Nor did the reality fall short of the anticipation. For a few days I was at the London Coffee House, on Lud- gate Hill, with Mr. Inskeep and other Americans. I delivered my letters to Mr. West, and was kindly received by him. I visited the galleries of artists, the theatres, and the other prin- cipal objects of attraction to strangers, and " Such sober certainty of waking bliss I never knew 'till now." But these enjoyments were soon interrupted by a severe ill- ness, which confined me to my room in the hotel. I was soli- tary, and began to find that even in London it was possible to be unhappy. I did not, however, feel this in its full force until I was settled in lodgings, consisting of two desolate-looking rooms up two pair of stairs, in Warren Street, Fitzroy Square. My new acquaintances, Allston, King, and Morse were very kind, but still they were new acquaintances. I thought of the happy circle round my mother's fireside, and there were moments in which, but for my obligations to Mr. Bradford and my other kind patrons, I could have been content to forfeit all the advan- tages I expected from my visit to England, and return imme- diately to America. The two years I was to remain in London seemed, in prospect, an age. Mr. Morse, who was but a year or two older than myself, and who had been in London but six months when I arrived, felt very much as I did, and we agreed to take apartments together. CHAP. II.] VISITS TO THE THEATEE. 21 For some time we painted in the same room, he at one window and I at the other. We drew at the Royal Academy in the evening, and worked at home in the day. Our Mentors were AlLston and King ; nor could we have been better provided : Allston, a most amiable and polished gentleman, and a painter of the purest taste ; and King, warm-hearted, sincere, sensible, prudent, and the strictest of economists. These gentlemen were our seniors; our most intimate associates of our own age were some young Bostonians, students of medicine, who were walking the hospitals, and attending the lectures of Cline, Cooper, and Abernethy. With them we often encountered the tremendous crowds that besieged the doors of Covent Garden Theatre when John Kemble and Mrs. Siddons played. It was the last season in which the public were to be gratified with the performance of the greatest actress that ever trod the stage, and we practised the closest economy that we might afford the expense of seeing her often. In the acting of Mrs. Siddons and John Kemble, I remember particularly (perhaps because it was somewhat unex- pected) the grace with which they could descend from the state- liness of tragedy to the easy manner of familiar life. The scene jn which Mrs. Siddons, as Volumnia, sat sewing with Virg*ilia, and the subsequent scene with Valeria, and in Hamlet, the man- ner in which John Kemble gave the conversations with the players, were beautiful instances of this. These passages are not comic ; but both brother and sister, in giving them, indicated the perfection of genteel comedy. Perhaps it is the highest praise of such acting to say, that it was truly Shakespearian, and made one feel, still more than in reading the plays, the value of such scenes. In the "Winter's Tale," also, the by-play of Leontes with the child Mamillius, while he is jealously watching Hermione and Polixenes, was marked by John Kemble with the same fine tact ; and the manner in which Mrs. Siddons, as Lady Macbeth, dismissed the guests from the banquet scene, has often been noticed among the minor beauties of her acting. After her retirement from the stage she was fond of adverting to her theatrical career, and in a conversation on this subject she said to my friend Newton, " / was an honest actress, and at all times in all things endeavoured to do my best." 22 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [chap. II. I thought the Falconhridge of Charles Kemble as perfect as the Coriolanus of his brother John. Nature, as well as art, had admirably adapted the brothers for these two characters. Charles, then young, possessed a heroic face and figure, and the spirit he threw into the reputed son of Cceur de Lion, as he played the character, was too natural not to be his own ; while the impatience of plebeian dictation as certainly belonged to John Kemble as his noble Roman countenance : indeed, I can imagine no other Coriolanus or Brutus. The cast of parts at that period was glorious. In the " Winter's Tale " we had John, and Charles Kemble, and Mrs. Siddons ; with Fawcett in Au- tolycus, Liston in the Clown, Blanchard in the old Shepherd, and Mrs. Harry Johnstone (a beautiful creature), in Perdita. It says much for the company of Drury Lane that they could attempt to compete with that of Covent Garden. The former had Bannister, Munden, and Dowton, and attracted full houses at the Lyceum Theatre, where they played while Drury Lane was rebuilding. My first instructors in painting were Mr. West and Mr. All- ston. They permitted me at all times to see the works they were engaged on, and were ever ready to give me advice and assistance in the pictures I attempted, which were then chiefly portraits of the size of life. It was Allston who first awakened what little sensibility I may possess to the beauties of colour. He first directed my attention to the Venetian school, particu- larly to the works of Paul Veronese, and taught me to see, through the accumulated dirt of ages, the exquisite charm that lay beneath. Yet, for a long time, I took the merit of the Vene- tians on trust, and, if left to myself, should have preferred works which I now feel to be comparatively worthless. I remember when the picture of " The Ages," by Titian, was first pointed out to me by Allston as an exquisite work, I thought he was laughing at me. It is but fair to myself, however, to say, that from the first I was delighted with the RafFaelles in the same collection (the Bridgwater). Mr. West gave me a note to Fuseli, whose authority was at that time sufficient to admit me to draw in the Royal Acad- emy as a probationer. I also became a student of the Townley CHAP II.] ALLSTON AND COLERIDGE. 23 Marbles in the British Museum, and through the introduction of Mr. West I had access to the Elgin Marbles, then deposited in a temporary building in the garden of Burlington House. Morse and I studied there from six till eight o'clock in the summer mornings, and I copied several pictures at Mr. West's house, where I had the constant benefit of the advice of the venerable and truly amiable President. I think it was during the second year of my residence in Lon- don that Allston's health became seriously affected; and, as change of air was recommended, he determined to visit Bristol, where he had an uncle living, who hearing of his state had ad- vised him to try the air of Clifton. Mr. and Mrs. Allston left London, accompanied by Morse and myself ; but when we reached Salt Hill, Allston became too ill to proceed, and it was determined that Morse should return to town and acquaint Cole- ridge with the circumstance. He was affectionately attached to Allston, and came to Salt Hill the same afternoon, accompanied by his friend Dr. Tathill. He stayed at the Inn for the few days that Allston was confined there. The house was so full that the poet was obliged to share a double-bedded room with me. We were kept up late in consequence of the critical condition of All- ston, and, when we retired, Coleridge seeing a copy of " Knick- erbocker's History of New York" (which I had brought with me) laying on the table, took it up and began reading. I went to bed, and I think he must have sate up the greater part of the night, for the next day I found he had nearly got through Knick- erbocker. This was many years before it was published in Eng- land, and the work was of course entirely new to him. He was delighted with it. I had seen Coleridge before, but it was on this occasion that my acquaintance commenced with this most extraordinary man, of whom it might be said, as truly as of Burke, that " his stream of mind was perpetual." His eloquence threw a new and beau- tiful light on most subjects, and when he was beyond my compre- hension, the melody of his voice, and the impressiveness of his manner held me a willing listener, and I was nattered at being supposed capable of understanding him. Indeed, men far ad- vanced beyond myself in education might have felt as children in his presence. 24 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. h. Luckily for me he could not help talking, be he where or with whom he might, and I shall ever regret that I did not take notes, imperfect as they must have been, of what he said. I can only now remember, that besides speaking much of Allston, whom he loved dearly, he gave an admirable analysis of the character of Don Quixote. He said, " there are two kinds of madness ; in the one, the object pursued is a sane one, the madness discover- ing itself only in the means by which it is to be gained. In the other, an insane intention is aimed at or compassed by means that the soundest mind would employ, as in cases of murder, suicide, etc. The madness of Don Quixote is of the first class, his intention being always to do good, and his delusion only as to the mode of accomplishing his object." It was said of Coleridge by one who knew him intimately, and was indeed one of his most active friends, that " he was a good man, but whenever anything presented itself to him in the shape of a moral duty he was utterly incapable of performing it." He had, no doubt, great faults and weaknesses, but this was unques- tionably a sweeping exaggeration, uttered perhaps in a moment of irritation. At Salt Hill, and on some other occasions, I wit- nessed his performance of the duties of friendship in a manner which few men of his constitutional indolence could have roused themselves to equal. I accompanied Mr. and Mrs. Allston to Clifton, where I spent a fortnight with them, and had the pleasure to leave our patient convalescent under the care of Mr. King, to whom Coleridge had procured him a letter from Southey. To this eminent sur- geon (under Providence) Allston believed he owed his life. During the gradual cure of his painful disorder, he was, how- ever, subject to a great deal of annoyance from his uncle, Mr. Vanderhorst, of a nature to be severely felt in his weak and nervous state ; and never, perhaps, did one kind-hearted man torment another more. Among one or two other prejudices, Mr. Vanderhorst cherished an inveterate animosity against doctors. " Don't let one of those rascals enter your door," was the burthen of his first visit to his suffering nephew. " Follow my advice, live well, and trust to the air of Clifton. You see how well I am," — he had only the CHAP. II.] VISIT TO CLIFTON. 25 gout, — " and how healthy all my family are, and this is because we never let a doctor come near us." At the very moment in which this advice was inflicted on the patient, we were expecting the arrival of Mr. King. Mr. Vanderhorst luckily left before the doctor came ; but as the latter visited Allston regularly twice a day, and Mr. Vanderhorst or one of his family called often, our apprehensions of a collision, or at least a discovery of what was going on, were unceasing. In the mean time Allston's gradual recovery was evident, and Mr. Vanderhorst took the whole credit of it to himself. While I was at Clifton, Coleridge very unexpectedly arrived and engaged to give a course of lectures on Milton and Shake- speare. I heard three of them, and here again the regret arises that I took no notes. In a letter I wrote at the time, and which has since been returned to me, I find the following passage: — " His object, he says, is not to show, what everybody acknowl- edges, that Shakespeare and Milton were men of great genius, but to efface the impression, that because their genius was great, they must necessarily have great faults, and to prove that their judg- ment was equal to their genius ; — in other words, that neither of them was an inspired idiot? " He has given me," I added, " a much more distinct and satisfactory view of the nature and ends of poetry, and of painting, than I ever had before." I was now admitted a student in the Antique Academy of which Fuseli was the keeper. I had been impressed with the greatest respect for his genius, both as a painter and a writer, before I left America. The engraving from his " Hamlet and the Ghost " had scared me from the window of a print shop in Philadelphia, and I still contemplate that matchless spectre with something of the same awe which it then inspired. I hoped for much advantage from studying under such a master, but he said little in the Academy. He generally came into the room once in the course of every evening, and rarely without a book in his hand. He would take any vacant place among the students, and sit reading nearly the whole time he stayed with us. I believe he was right. For those students who are born with powers that will make them eminent, it is sufficient to place fine works of art before them. They do not want instruction, and those that do are 26 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. II. not worth it. Art may be learnt, but can't be taught. Under Fuseli's wise neglect, Wilkie, Mulready, Etty, Landseer, and Haydon distinguished themselves, and were the better for not be- ing made all alike by teaching, if indeed that could have been done. I obtained two silver medals in the Academy, and, Mr. West being indisposed, I received them on both occasions from the hand of Fuseli. The first was for a drawing from the Laocoon ; Fuseli had ordered that we should draw the principal figure only : but as, from the number of competitors, I could obtain no other seat than one from which part of the father was hidden by one of the boys, I asked him if I might introduce that boy. He ob- jected. I urged that I could not draw the limb that was hidden, except from imagination, and again I begged him to let me put in the boy. He replied, " if you draw one you must draw both, and I won't have an ape and two monkeys," — alluding to the carica- ture of the group, by Titian. The other drawing for which I received a medal was from the life, and the figure was set by Flaxman. I value my medals, therefore, the more as being associated with my recollections of these two great artists. One evening, in the Life Academy, while Westmacott was visitor, Fuseli came in, and I heard part of an argument between them on the merits of the Elgin Marbles. Fuseli had never fully shared in the enthusiasm with which Mr. West and other artists hailed their arrival in England. It was the fashion with some of them (not with Mr. West, I think,) to praise the Elgin Marbles as superior even to the Apollo. To some remark of Westmacott, in praise of the Theseus, Fuseli replied : " The Apollo is a god, the man in the Mews is a demi-god,* and the Theseus is a man." " You will admit," said Westmacott, " that he is a hero ? " " No," replied Fuseli, " he is only a strong man." Edwin Landseer, who entered the Academy very early, and was a pretty little curly-headed boy, attracted Fuseli's attention by his talents and gentle manners. Fuseli would look round for him, and say, " Where is my little dog boy ? " * A cast from the collossal figure of the Monte Cavallo, then exhibited in the King's Mews. CHAP. II.] FUSELI. 27 Allan Cunningham has said truly that Fuseli was liked by the students, notwithstanding the occasional violence of his temper. I have no recollection, however, of his being near-sighted, as this biographer asserts. On the contrary, my impression is, that his sight was remarkably good at any distance. He was ambi-dex- trous, and generally corrected our drawings with his left hand. Harlowe's small portrait of him is the most like : but it would have required a Reynolds to do justice to the intelligence of his fine head. His keen eye, of the most transparent blue, I shall never forget. None of his peculiarities, either as a man or a painter, pre- vented his being a great favourite among ladies. He was fond of female society, and at the theatre, particularly, as I was told by a lady who knew him intimately, he was a truly delightful companion. He was most fond of those nights when the plays of Shakespeare formed the entertainment, and on such occasions his deep knowledge and enthusiastic admiration of the poet, as well as his own wit, rendered the intervals between the acts as agreeable to his companions as the time occupied in the perform- ance. As the influence of women softened his temper and called forth all his powers of pleasing, it is not surprising that Mary Wolstonecraft fell in love with him when he was fifty, or that more than one lady felt for him something akin to love in the very last years of his life. The first large picture I attempted was of Saul and the Witch of Endor. West greatly assisted me in the composition, calling frequently at my room while I was about it. When the picture was done I sent it to the British Gallery for exhibition ; but, as it was not varnished, it appeared unfinished, and was turned out. Mr. West desired me to carry it to his house, where I varnished it in his large room, and there, by his kind influence, it was soon purchased by Sir John Leicester,* who gave me a hundred guineas for it. Allston was now in London again. His own health was re- established, but that of his excellent wife was much impaired. They had taken a house and furnished it, having till now lived in lodgings, and had but just removed when her illness suddenly * Afterwards Lord de Tabley. 28 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. II. increased, and she died in two or three days. In fact, after tak- ing possession of her new home, she never recrossed the thresh- old alive. She was a sister of Dr. Channing, of whom I often heard her speak before he was known in England. She was never tired of talking of " that little saint, William," as she called him. The very clay of which the Channings were formed seemed to have religion in its composition. Mrs. Allston told me that her brother, when a child, used to turn a chair into a pulpit and preach little sermons to the other children of the fam- ily. I saw Channing often during his short stay in London — and to see was to love him. At his request, I accompanied him to the burying-ground of St. Pancras Chapel, to show him his sister's grave. After the death of his wife, Allston quitted his house and hired apartments at No. 8, Buckingham Place, Fitz- roy Square, where Morse and myself lodged. In September, 1817, I went with Allston and William Collins to Paris. We all made studies in the Louvre, and visited the houses of the principal artists, though Gerard was the only one with whom we had an interview, and he, though he received us very politely, did not show us any of his pictures. Of the mod- ern French pictures we did see we were most pleased with those of Guerin. His " Dido and JEneas " was just then completed, and a picture of La Roche Jacquelin heading a charge of Ven- deans. I was asked by a French lady how I liked the great works of David — the " Romans and Sabines " and the " Leoni- das." I said I did not think them natural. " Not natural ! " she exclaimed. " I assure you he never paints any object whatever without having nature before him." I could have told her, had it been worth while to pursue the argument, that many an artist paints with nature before him with- out pairKing naturally. Many a one paints from nature in the sense in which the Irishman, who was mistaken for a Scotchman, said he was "from Scotland — a great way from Scotland, thanks be to God for that same ! " We found that Wilkie's reputation was, at that time, very high in France. " I like your Vilhes, but I don't like your Vest" said a Frenchman to me. Being employed to paint some portraits of Americans in Paris, chap, it.] COLERIDGE'S LECTURES ON SHAKESPEARE. 29 I remained there three months, and then returned to London, in company with Stuart Newton, whom I met in Paris for the first time. He. was on his way from Italy to England, and he and I made an excursion through Brussels and Antwerp, where I had the pleasure of dining at the house of my friend, Mr. Clibborn', whose exertions for me in Philadelphia had, in a great measure, led to my becoming a painter. Washington Irving was in England, but at Liverpool, occupied with business ; the mercantile house to which he belonged being at that time in a state of embarrassment which led to a bank- ruptcy. When this took place, Irving, after a short excursion to Scotland, where he became known to Sir Walter Scott, came to London with the intention of exerting himself as an author, though with no expectation of becoming popular in England. The " Sketch Book " was written solely with a view to publica- tion in America, where " Salmagundi," and " Knickerbocker " had gained him a high reputation. Morse had returned to America, and Allston soon after fol- lowed him. The best picture the latter left in England was his " Jacob's Dream," at Petworth. It was bought by Lord Egre- mont, who invited the artist to Petworth, and would, no doubt, have employed him on other works, if he had remained in this country. The friends with whom I now spent most of my lei- sure were Irving and Newton. I had frequent opportunities of seeing and hearing Coleridge. He delivered a course of lectures on Shakespeare, to which he gave me tickets, but I was sorry to see his London audiences much smaller than those at Bristol. The following note from him marks the date of these lectures. " Highgate. "My dear Leslie, " Mr. Colburn has entreated my influence with you to have in- trusted to him for a week or ten days your last drawing of my phiz to have it engraved for his Magazine. I replied that I had no objection, and thought it probable that you would have none, and have in consequence given him this note. " You see, alas ! by my scanty audiences that there cannot be 30 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. II. the least objection to your taking with you half a dozen friends to my lectures, who are like ourselves, with more in our brains than in our pockets. Why, my dear Leslie, do you so wholly desert us at Highgate ? Are we not always delighted to see you ? Now, too, more than ever ; since, in addition to yourself, you are all we have of Allston. "S. T. Coleridge." " Is* March, 1819." On looking back to the time when this note was written, I grieve to think that I should have allowed my natural indolence, the distance, and occupations, often trifling in comparison with the privilege of enjoying Coleridge's society, to give ground for the charge in the latter part of it. It is not the lot of any one, twice in his life, to meet with so extraordinary a man. I now read over and over again what his nephew has recorded of his conversation, and I can vouch for the exactness with which his manner is preserved in those precious little volumes. The remarks there given, on " Othello " and " Hamlet," formed parts of his lectures on Shakespeare : — " The clue to the inconsistencies of Hamlet might be found," he said, " in the undue predominance of the inner over the outer man." Coleridge did not consider that the passion of jealousy was the subject of the tragedy of " Othello," but that Shakespeare had displayed it fully and truly in the " Winter's Tale." " Othello is anything but jealous in his nature, and made so only by the machinations of lago, while Leontes requires no prompter but his own suspicious mind." He observed, that the difficulty was great in imagining an expression adequate to the feelings of Othello when he first sees Iago after having discovered his villany, and he thought it a master stroke of Shakespeare to surmount it as he has done : " I look clown towards his feet; but that's a fable. If that thou be'st a devil I cannot kill thee." He pointed out the great dramatic beauty of the opening scenes of " Hamlet," and the admirable skill with which the ghost- is introduced. Although Marcellus and Bernardo are expecting its chap, ii.] COLERIDGE'S LECTURES ON SHAKESPEARE. 31 appearance, and Horatio has joined their watch with the same expectation, and they are even talking about it, its entrance is startling, and every succeeding appearance alike thrilling. In reading passages from the first scenes of this play, Coleridge noticed Shakespeare's respect even for the superstitions connected with the mysteries of Christianity, a beautiful instance of which occurs in the lines, " It faded on the crowing of the cock. Some say, that ever 'gainst that season comes, Wherein our Saviour's birth is celebrated, This bird of dawning singeth all night long: And then, they say, no spirit dares stir abroad; The nights are wholesome ; then no planets strike, No fairy takes, nor witch hath power to charm ; So hallow'd and so gracious is the time." He said the reply of Horatio was, he believed, exactly that winch Shakespeare himself would have made : " So have I heard, and do in part believe it." He could never read, he said, any of those scenes in which children are introduced, " without laying the book down and lov- ing Shakespeare over again." He said the anachronisms noticed by Shakespeare's critics would not, perhaps, have given the poet himself any great uneasiness had they been pointed out to him, as possibly they were ; and this may have given rise to that curious intentional anachronism in the third act of " Lear," where the fool, after fourteen lines of a burlesque prediction, says : " This prophecy Merlin shall make, for Hive before his time." I wish I could recollect what Coleridge said of the character of Falstaff. I only remember, with certainty, his opinion that Shakespeare, in the " Merry Wives of Windsor," had departed from the original conception of the character, and that the Fal- staff in that play, though very amusing, was much below the Fal- staff of the two parts of " Henry the Fourth." I am not sure whether it was Coleridge who remarked, that in the scene in the First Part of " Henry the Fourth," in which Falstaff brags of his feats at Gadshill, he begins with the intention of imposing on 32 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. Hi the Prince and Poins, but quickly perceiving that they do not believe him, he goes on buffooning, and adds to the men in buck- ram until they amount to eleven, merely to make the Prince laugh. A most interesting portion of Coleridge's lectures consisted in his pointing out the truth and refinement of Shakespeare's women, beyond those of all other dramatists ; and how purified his imagi- nation was from everything gross, in comparison with those of his contemporaries. Coleridge's lectures were, unfortunately, extemporaneous. He now and then took up scraps of paper on which he had noted the leading points of his subject, and he had books about him for quotation. On turning to one of these (a work of his own *), he said, " As this is a secret which I confided to the public a year or two ago, and which, to do the public justice, has been very faithfully kept, I may be permitted to read you a passage from it." His voice was deep and musical, and his words followed each other in an unbroken flow, yet free from monotony. There was indeed a peculiar charm in his utterance. His pronunciation was remarkably correct : in some respects pedantically so. He gave the full sound of the / in talk, and should and would. Sir James Mackintosh attended the whole course of these lec- tures, and listened with the greatest interest. This was heaping coals of fire on the head of Coleridge, who had lampooned him with great severity for his political apostacy, as it was considered. I remember many years afterwards, when I had frequent oppor- tunities of seeing Sir James, hearing him say that the best thing ever said of ghosts was by Coleridge, who, when asked by a lady if he believed in them, replied, "No, Madam, I have seen too many to believe in them." It was in company with Coleridge that I first heard the night- ingale, that is, to know that I heard it. It was in a lane near Highgate where there were a number singing, and he easily dis- tinguished and pointed out to me their full rich notes among those of other birds, for it was in • the day time. He even told how many were there. He took me to an eminence in the neighbor- hood, commanding a view of Caen wood, and said the assemblage * Probably the " Biographia Literaria," published in 1817. CHAP. II.] FRAGMENTS OF COLERIDGE. 33 of objects, as seen from that point, reminded him of the passage in Milton, beginning — " Strait mine eye hath caught new pleasures, Whilst the landskip round it measures; " — and running through the following eighteen or twenty lines. Among the fragments of his conversation that I remember, are the following : — " How natural is the exaggeration in the account the woman of Samaria carries to her friends of our Saviour. * Come, see a man which told me all things that ever I did ; ' when, in reality, our Lord had only told her that she had had five husbands, and that he, whom she now had, was not her husband." He said he did not doubt but that in the 12th chapter of St. Matthew, the 40th verse was a gloss : ' " For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly : so shall the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." Now, as our Saviour was crucified on Friday, and rose again * on Sunday morning, he was but one entire day and two nights in the tomb ; besides which the following verse shows sufficiently what was intended by the refusal to give any other sign than the sign of the prophet Jonas. u The men of Nineveh shall rise up in judgment with this gen- eration and condemn it, because they repented at the preaching of Jonas, and behold, a greater than Jonas is here." Speaking of the utilitarians, Coleridge said, " The penny saved penny got utilitarians forget, or do not comprehend, high moral utility, — the utility of poetry and of painting, and of all that exalts and refines our nature." He thought Lord Byron's misan- thropy was affected, or partly so, and that it would wear off as he grew older. He said that Byron's perpetual quarrel with the world was as absurd as if the spoke of a wheel should quarrel witli the movement of which it must of necessity partake. But Lord Byron had not then proved, as he afterwards did, that with all his surprising and varied powers, possessing an eye for material beauty, and extraordinary eloquence in describing it, he wanted the first requisite of a great poet, a true perception of moral beauty. 3 34 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. II. Coleridge dearly loved Allston, and of Mrs. Allston lie said (and I who knew her intimately, can bear witness how truly), " She is an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile." I once found Coleridge driving the balls on a bagatelle board for a kitten to run after them. He noticed that, as soon as the little thing turned its back to the balls it seemed to forget all about them, and played with its tail. " I am amused," he said, u with their little short memories." Coleridge's want of success in all worldly matters may be at- tributed to the mastery possessed over him by his own wonderful mind. Common men as often succeed by the qualities they want, as great men fail by those they have. Coleridge could not direct his extraordinary powers to the immediately useful occupations of life, or to those exercises of them likely to procure him bread, unless he was perpetually urged on by some kind friend. The tragedy of " Remorse " was written whilst he lived with Mr. Morgan, and I believe would never have been completed but for 'the importunities of Mrs. Morgan. A few days after the ap- pearance of his piece, he was sitting in the coffee-room of a hotel, and heard his name coupled with a coroner's inquest, by a gentle- man who was reading a newspaper to a friend. He asked to see the paper, which was handed to him with the remark that " It was very extraordinary that Coleridge, the poet, should have hanged himself just after the success of his play ; but he was al- ways a strange mad fellow." " Indeed, sir," said Coleridge, " it is a most extraordinary thing that he should have hanged himself, be the subject of an inquest, and yet that he should at this moment be speaking to you." The astonished stranger hoped he had " said nothing to hurt his feelings," and was made easy on that point. The newspaper related that a gentleman in black had been cut down from a tree in Hyde Park, without money or papers in his pockets, his shirt being marked " S. T. Coleridge ; " and Coleridge was at no loss to understand how this might have happened, since he seldom travelled without losing a shirt or two. When Allston was suffering extreme depression of spirits, im- mediately after the loss of his wife, he was haunted, during sleep- less nights, by horrid thoughts ; and he told me that diabolical imprecations forced themselves into his mind. The distress of CHAP. II.] ALLSTON. CHARLES LAMB. 35 this to a man so sincerely religious as Allston, may be imagined. He wished to consult Coleridge, but could not summon resolution. He desired, therefore, that I would do it ; and I went to High- gate, where Coleridge was at that time living with Mr. Gillman. I found him walking in the garden, his hat in his hand (as it generally was in the open air), for he told me that, having been one of the Blue-coat boys, among whom it is the fashion to go bare-headed, he had acquired a dislike to any covering of the head. I explained the cause of my visit, and he said, "Allston should say to himself, ' Nothing is me but my will. These thoughts, therefore, that force themselves on my mind are no part of me, and there can be no guilt in them.' If he will make a strong effort to become indifferent to their recurrence they will either cease, or cease to trouble him." He said much more, but this was the substance, and after it was repeated to Allston, I did not hear him again complain of the same kind of disturbance. At Mr. Morgan's house in Berners Street, I first saw Charles Lamb, who was intimate in a literary coterie composed of per- sons with principles very opposite to those of Coleridge. Some- body, wishing to give the latter a favourable impression of these people, spoke of Lamb's friendship for them ; and Coleridge re- plied, " Charles Lamb's character is a sacred one with me ; no associations that he may form can hurt the purity of his mind, but it is not, therefore, necessary that I should see all men with his eyes." There can be no doubt that it was of Lamb he spoke in the following passage from the " Table Talk : " — " Nothing ever left a stain on that gentle creature's mind, which looked upon the degraded men and things around him like moonshine on a dunghill, which shines and takes no pollution. All things are shadows to him, except those which move his affections." No one ever more fully pictured his own mind in his writings than Lamb has done in his delightful Essays ; and every reader of them, I think, must acknowledge that Coleridge, in what he said, only did his friend justice. But Lamb, from the dread of ap- pearing affected, sometimes injured himself by his behaviour before persons who were slightly acquainted with him. With the finest and tenderest feelings ever possessed by man, he seemed care- fully to avoid any display of sentimentality in his talk. The fol- 30 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. II. lowing trifling anecdote is merely given as an illustration of his playfulness. I dined with him one day at Mr. Gillman's. Return- ing to town in the stage-coach, which was filled with Mr. Gill- man's guests, we stopped for a minute or two at Kentish Town. A woman asked the coachman, " are you full inside ? " Upon which Lamb put his head through the window and said, " I am quite full inside ; that last piece of pudding at Mr. Gillman's did the business for me." Much as I then admired the traits of his mind and feelings shown in his charming Essays, little did I comprehend the entire worth of his character. I had often met his sister Mary, a quiet old lady, who was like him in face, but stouter in figure. I knew that, at times, her mind had been unhinged from an early period, but I never heard of the dreadful act with which her insanity began until long after the time of which I am writing ; and I was unacquainted, therefore, with the unparalleled excellence of her brother, the strength of his love, the greatness of his courage, and that noble system of economy in which he persevered to the end of his days, so difficult to a man who had so thorough a rel- ish for all the elegances and luxuries of life ; indeed impossible, had he not had a still higher relish for the luxury of goodness. The letters published, after his death and that of his sister, by Mr. Talfourd, make up a volume of more interest to me than any book of human composition. I have noticed that Lamb sometimes did himself injustice by his odd sayings and actions, and he now and then did the same by his writings. His " Confessions of a Drunkard " greatly ex- aggerate any habits of excess he may ever have indulged. The regularity of his attendance at the India House, and the liberal manner in which he was rewarded for that attendance, prove that he never could have been a drunkard. Well, indeed, would it be for the world if such extraordinary virtues as he possessed were often found in company with so very few faults. Sir George Beaumont left £100 to Mrs. Coleridge, but nothing to her husband, who was then, as always, very poor. Lamb was indignant at this, and said it seemed to mark Coleridge with a stigma. " If," he added, " Coleridge was a scamp, Sir George should not have continued, as he did, to invite him to dinner." CHAPTER III. President West — Washington Irving and Walter Scott — Visit to Oxford — Elected associate — Sir Joshua Reynolds — Flaxman and Lawrence — Flaxman and Canova — Chantrey — Garrick and Parliament. I should have mentioned that, in the year 1818, I was in- vited into Devonshire by my kind friends, Mr. and Mrs. Dunlop, who had taken a house at Dawlish for the season. I spent a fortnight very delightfully with them, and then visited Plymouth, and the pretty village of Plympton, where I made a sketch of the house in which Sir Joshua Reynolds was born. After my return to London I painted, for Mr. Dunlop, " Sir Roger de Coverley going to Church, accompanied by 4 The Spec- tator.'" This picture attracted more notice in the Exhibition than anything I had hitherto painted, and the Marquis of Lans- downe employed me to repeat the subject for him. In the spring of 1819, Mr. West was confined to his house by illness. I was with him a few days before the close of the Exhi- bition, and on his expressing a wish that he could see it, I asked him if it was not possible. He answered " that he was too feeble to go on a public day, and that his only chance of visiting it was on the day after it closed ; but that, if the Prince Regent went, he, as President, must attend upon His Royal Highness — a cer- emony for which he was too unwell." " But surely," said I, " the Prince, knowing how ill you are, would excuse you from the fatigue of attendance." " No," he replied ; " if the Prince goes, I cannot ; " and then, after a pause, he added, " Mr. Leslie, it is now many years since I have had cause to know the wisdom of David's advice, ' put not your trust in princes.' " George the Third had been cordially West's friend, as long as he possessed his senses ; but as soon as his derangement trans- 38 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. III. ferred his powers to others, the pension Mr. West had received from him was stopped, and he was given to understand that those works he was engaged on for the King, would not be paid for. He was unable to see the Exhibition of 1819, whether in conse- quence of ill-health, or of its being visited by the Prince, I now forget ; and before the Exhibition of 1820, this eminent artist, and amiable, generous man, was no more. Constable told me that on calling at his house the day after his death, West's old and faithful servant, Robert Brenning, remarked to him, " Ah, sir ! where will they go now ? " meaning the younger artists. And well might the old man say so ; for al- though I know of no eminent painter in London, who is not will- ing to communicate instruction to any of his brethren who need it, yet at that time there was not, nor indeed has there been since, any one so accessible as Mr. West, and, I may add, so well quali- fied to give advice on every branch of the art. He had gener- ally a levee of artists at his house every morning before he began work.* Nor did a shabby coat or an old hat, ever occasion his door to be shut in the face of the wearer. Constable said truly of West that, " in his own room, and with a picture before him, his instructions were invaluable ; but, as a public lecturer, he failed." This arose, partly, perhaps from diffidence. On the only occasion on which I heard him address an assembly, the vener- able old man, when he began to speak, blushed like a young girl. In this lecture, he explained to us his theory of the arrangement of colours, which he said was founded on the rainbow. The principal masses of warm colour, as orange, yellow, and red, by this principle, he placed on that side of the picture where the light enters, and the green, blue, and purple on the opposite side, where also he placed his chief mass of white. He said he could only trace the observance of this rule, as a principle, in the later works of RafFaelle, and that it was from studying the cartoons he had discovered it. He admitted that in Titian's " Peter Martyr," the arrangement of colour is on a plan exactly contrary, but added, " Titian's eye was so fine that he could produce harmony by any arrangement." * This, I am told, was also the case with Sir Joshua Reynolds, who was equally ready to advise and assist young painters. CHAP. III.] PRESIDENT WEST. 30 I remember his remarking to me how different, at different times, and under different circumstances, the same picture may- appear to us, and how greatly we are often influenced in the im- pression we receive from one picture, by the effect produced on us by another which we have just seen. As an illustration of this, he told me that, having to superintend an alteration of the arrangement of some of the pictures in the Royal collection (of which he had the care), and knowing that a Vandyke, which Sir Joshua Reynolds greatly admired, would be taken down, he called on him on his way, and Sir Joshua very gladly accompanied him to Buckingham House. They found the Vandyke standing on the floor. Sir Joshua eagerly ran up to it, and after examining it very closely, turned to Mr. West with an air of disappointment, and said, "After all it is a copy." To this "West made no immediate reply, but they looked at some of the other pictures in the room ; and then returning to the Vandyke, Reynolds said, " I don't know what to think of it ; it is much more beautiful than it appeared to me at first. It can hardly be a copy." Mr. West replied, " I have no doubt of its originality, and I can explain the cause of your disappointment on first seeing it. When I called on you, you were engaged on one of your own dashing back- grounds, preparing it with the brightest colours for glazing. Your eye had perhaps been for an hour on your own work, and anything would look tame and dull after it. The Vandyke appeared to you, at first sight, to want brightness, and to be weak and timid in execution ; but when you had looked at the other pictures in the room and returned to it, the taste, truth, and deli- cacy with which it is painted, became apparent to you." In talking with Mr. West on dress, he mentioned the great im- portance that attached to an expensive wig within his own recol- lection. He remembered an argument on the merits of O'Brian,* an actor of genteel comedy in the early part of the reign of George the Third, in which a gentleman of the old school main- tained, contrary to the opinion of the company, that he was not * The same whose marriage with Lady Susan Fox, eldest daughter of the first Lord Ilchester, excited such a sensation in the fashionable world of the last century. (See Walpole's letter to the Earl of Hertford of April 12, 1764.) — Ed. 40 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. HI. successful in characters of high life. " Mr. O'Brian," said he, " does not play the fine gentleman ; nor can any man play the fine gentleman without a fifty guinea wig on his head.'' Gait, in his " Life of West," says, " When the West family emigrated, John, the father of Benjamin, was left to complete his education at the great school of the Quakers, at Uxbridge, and did not join his relations in America till the year 1714." Whether or not John West went to America immediately on leaving school, I have heard, on good authority, that he was married before he left England, and that his wife, not being in a condition to undertake the voyage, remained at home, an- other reason for this being his uncertainty whether he should settle in America. She gave birth to a son, and died. The child was taken care of by relations, who, when the father de- sired it should be sent to him, begged to keep it. To this he assented ; and marrying again, the painter was the youngest of the ten children of his American wife. When Benjamin left home to seek his fortune in Europe, he was engaged to the lady he afterwards married, Elizabeth Shewell. In 17G5 his vener- able father accompanied her to England, and then, for the first time in his life, was introduced to his eldest son, who was fifty years of age. He was a watchmaker, and lived at Reading. There is a stippled engraving * of West's family, which I re- member to have seen in the window of a print shop in Philadel- phia when I was so young as not even to have heard of the painter. The natural and simple treatment of the subject made a great impression on me even then, and to this hour it has not ceased to interest me more than any other composition by West, great or small. I look on it indeed as the most original of all his works ; and cannot but regret that, instead of being ambitious to produce, too rapidly for excellence, many pictures of large dimen- sions, he had not looked more about him in real life for subjects like this, in which he seems to have been eminently qualified to excel. His works of higher pretension, compared with it, prove the truth of Johnson's remark, " That which is greatest is not always best." The picture, which now belongs to Raphael West (the boy standing by his mother's side), is no larger than the * This engraving used to hang in Leslie's drawing-room. — Ed. CHAP. III.] PRESIDENT WEST. 41 print, and of no great excellence in colour. "West himself seems to have been pleased with the group, as a happy treatment of the often-painted subject, " The Ages of Man." To my mind, it is incomparably the best. He repeated it with great variations; substituting loose draperies for the modern dresses, and it im- mediately became common-place ; an additional proof to those furnished by the histories of most artists of the danger of en- deavouring to improve on incidents taken from real life. In the first picture, everything is individual and characteristic, every- thing essential. The hats on the heads of John West and his eldest son, in the presence of a lady, mark the sect who never uncover their heads in token of respect but when they kneel to God. These relatives are paying their first visit to Mrs. West on the birth of her second child. They are sitting, as is the custom of quakers, for a few minutes in silent meditation, which will soon be ended by the old man's taking off his hat and offer- ing up a prayer for the mother and infant. Wilkie greatly ad- mired this composition before he knew the entire meaning of the subject. He was struck with its extreme simplicity, and the un- ostentatious breadth of its masses of light and dark. Mr. West told me that on asking his father how he was struck with the appearance of London after his long absence, he re- plied, " The streets and houses look very much as they did ; but can thee tell me what has become of all the Englishmen ? When I left England, the men were a portly, comely race, with broad skirts and large flowing wigs; rather slow in their movements, and grave and dignified in their deportment : but now they are docked and cropped, and skipping about in scanty clothes like so many monkeys." The impression made on the old man shows how greatly French fashions and manners had gained ground in England during the half century he had passed in America. In Hogarth's works there are many hints of this. The bride- groom in the first picture of the " Marriage a la Mode," is evi- dently dressed on the model of a Paris beau ; the boy beating a drum in " The enraged Musician," has been metamorphosed, as far as dress could do it, into a little Frenchman ; the two gallants in the boxes in " The laughing Audience," are as French as possible, while the pit is filled with plain English folk who are not 42 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. III. too fine to take an interest in the performance ; and in " Taste in High Life," the antiquated beau, dressed in the extreme of the Parisian fashion, has succeeded in making himself look very like a monkey. Goldsmith represents the landlord of "The Three Pigeons " as telling Tony Lumpkin that Hastings and Marlowe " may be Londoners, for they look woundily like Frenchmen." This fashion was checked by the French Revolution, and put an end to, for a time, by the war that followed it ; but there can be no doubt that, though often interrupted by political events, it is (among the aristocracy of England) as old as the time of William of Normandy, and the natural result of the Conquest.* In April, 1820, Irving took me to breakfast with Sir Walter Scott, who was then in London, and at the house of his friend, Mrs. Dumergue, in Piccadilly. I had never before seen the great novelist. He was in the full enjoyment of his high and increas- ing reputation, and he appeared to great advantage. A large party of ladies and gentlemen were assembled at the breakfast table, among whom was one of the sons of Johnson's Boswell. Nothing could be more agreeable than my daily intercourse at this period with Irving and Newton. We visited in the same families, chiefly Americans resident in London, and generally dined together at the York Chop House, in Wardour Street. Irving's brother, Peter, an amiable man, and not without a dash of Washington's humour, was always of our party. Delightful were our excursions to Richmond or Greenwich, or to some suburban fair, on the top of a coach. The harmony that sub- sisted among us was uninterrupted ; but Irving grew into fame as an author, and being, all at once, made a great lion of by fashion- able people, he was much withdrawn from us. Newton, too, who was naturally formed for society, was soon much noticed for his agreeable qualities, as well as for his eminence in art, and our intercourse was a good deal interrupted in consequence. Irving writing to me from Paris in 1824, said, " I often look back with fondness and regret on the times when we lived to- gether in London, in a delightful community of thought and feel- ing ; struggling our way onward in the world, but cheering and * I should be inclined to trace it to a more recent soui*ce of influence — the imitation of French fashions among the courtiers of the Restoration. — Ed. chap, m.] VISIT TO OXFORD. 43 encouraging each other. I find nothing to supply the place of that heartfelt fellowship." I had been for some time what is called acquainted with Con- stable, but it was only by degrees and in the course of years that I became really acquainted either with his worth as a man, or his true value as an artist. My taste was very faulty and .Jong in forming ; and of landscape, which I had never studied, I really knew nothing, or worse than nothing, for I admired, as poetical, styles which I now see to be mannered, conventional, or extrava- gant. But the more I knew of Constable, the more I regretted that I had not known him at the commencement of my studies. As I have published all I recollect of him that seems to me best worth preserving, I have nothing to add except some memo- randa made at a later period than that of which I am now writ- ing. ToAvards the close of the summer of 1821, I made a delightful excursion with Washington Irving to Birmingham, and thence into Derbyshire. We mounted the top of one of the Oxford coaches at three o'clock in the afternoon, intending only to go as far as Henley that night ; but the evening was so fine, and the fields, filled with labourers gathering in the corn by the light of a full moon, presented so animated an appearance, that although we had not dined we determined to proceed to Oxford, which we reached about eleven o'clock, and then sat down to a hot supper. The next day it rained unceasingly, and we were confined to the inn, like the nervous traveller whom Irving has described as spending a day in endeavouring to penetrate the mystery of " the stout gentleman." This wet Sunday at Oxford did, in fact, sug- gest to him that capital story, if story it can be called. The next morning, as we mounted the coach, I said something about a stout gentleman who had come from London with us the day before, and Irving remarked that " The Stout Gentleman," would not be a bad title for a tale. As soon as the coach stopped he began writing with his pencil, and went on at every like opportunity. We visited Stratford on Avon, strolled about Charlecot Park and other places in the neighbourhood, and while I was sketching, Irving, mounted on a stile, or seated on a stone, was busily en- gaged with " The Stout Gentleman " He wrote with the greatest 44 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. III. rapidity, often laughing to himself, and from time to time reading the manuscript to me. We loitered some days in this classic neighbourhood, visiting Warwick and Kenilworth ; and by the time we arrived at Birmingham, the outline of " The Stout Gentleman " was completed. The amusing account of " The Modem Knights Errant," he added at Birmingham, and the inimitable picture of the inn yard on a rainy day was taken from an inn where we were afterwards quartered at Derby. It had been the custom for visitors to Shakespeare's house to scribble their names, and sometimes scraps of bad poetry, on its walls. Irving, on a former visit to Stratford, had given a large blank book to the woman who had the care of the house, to save the walls from further desecration. We found in it the name of Sir Walter Scott, who had been there with a party not long before, and were amused with the following anonymous parody on the inscription which Shakespeare wrote for his own tomb : " Good friend, for Shakespeare's sake, forbear Thy wit or lore to scribble here; Blessed are they that rightly con him, And curs'd be they that comment on him." In November, 1821, I was elected an associate of the Royal Academy. I was, on every account, much elated with this event, one of the great advantages resulting from which was the oppor- tunities it afforded me of frequent intercourse with the best artists ; with Wilkie, Stothard, Flaxman, Chantrey, Lawrence, Turner, Chalon, and Smirke, upon whom, though he had then retired from the Avorld, I was now entitled to call. I found him a most sensible and agreeable man. I remember, when I was a student of the Academy, hearing Sam Strowger tell of a dialogue that had just passed between Fuseli and himself, as follows : — " Sam, I am invited to dine out ; have you any objection to my going?" " That's according where it is, Mr. Fuseli." " At Mr. Smirke's, Sam." " Oh no, sir. Mr. Smirke is a very nice gentleman ; and I only wish I was qualified to go with you, sir." Strowger will long be remembered at the Academy, not only CHAP. III.] ELECTED ASSOCIATE. 45 as a character, but as the most intelligent and faithful of servants to the Institution. When he brought me my Associate's diploma, he said, " I wish you health to enjoy it, sir, and I hope I shall soon bring you another ; but all in good time ; we must not be in too great a hurry to get rid of old masters and get new ones ; " and then, fearing he had depressed me, he added in a lower tone, " but there are some of them, sir, can't last long." It is the etiquette for a newly-elected member to call immedi- ately on all the Academicians, and I did not omit paying my respects to Northcote among the rest, although I knew he was not on good terms with the Academy. I was shown up stairs into a large front room filled with pictures, many of the larger ones resting against each other, and all of them dim with dust. I had not waited long, when a door opened which communicated with his painting-room, and the old gentleman appeared, but did not advance beyond it. His diminutive figure was enveloped in a chintz dressing-gown, below which his trowsers, which looked as if made for a much taller man, hung in loose folds over an im- mense pair of shoes, into which his legs seemed to have shrunk down. His head was covered with a blue silk night-cap, and from under that and his projecting brows, his sharp black eyes peered at me with a whimsical expression of inquiry. There he stood, with his palette and brushes in one hand, and a mahl-stick, twice as long as himself, in the other ; his attitude and look say- ing, for he did not speak, " What do you want ? " On telling him that I had been elected an Associate of the Academy, he said quickly, " And who's the other ? " " Mr. Clint," I replied. " And so Clint's got it at last. You are an architect, I believe." I set him right ; and he continued, " Well, sir, you owe nothing to me ; I never go near them ; indeed I never go out at night anywhere." I told him I knew that, but thought it right to pay my respects to all the Academicians, and hoped I was not inter- rupting him. He said, " By no means ; " and asked me into his painting-room, where he was at work on an equestrian picture of George IV., as large as life, which he must have made up from busts and pictures. " I was desirous," he said, " to paint the King, for there is no picture that is like him " (I could not help contrasting to myself Lawrence's pictures of his Majesty with the 40 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. III. one before me, and by no means to its advantage) ; " and he is by far," continued Northcote, " the best King of his family we have had. It *has been remarked that this country is best governed by a woman, for then the government is carried on by able men ; and George IV. is like a woman, for he minds only his own amusements, and leaves the affairs of the country to his ministers, instead of meddling himself, as his father did. He is just what a King of England should be, something to look grand, and to hang the robes on." He talked of Sir Joshua Reynolds, and I asked him whether he thought Sir Joshua was fully aware of his own great excel- lence. He said, "Perhaps not; I believe Sir Joshua did not, in his own estimation, rank himself as high as Vandyke. When young artists asked him to lend them his pictures to copy, he did not refuse, but was accustomed to say, 6 If you can get a fine Vandyke, it will be much more useful to you.' " Northcote showed me what I supposed to be a picture by Reynolds ; but he told me it was a copy by Jackson, and said, " I have been myself deceived by his copies." I asked leave to repeat my visit, which was readily granted, and from that time we were very good friends. He talked better than he painted. When I first found myself painting in the exhibition rooms of the Royal Academy, where most of its members were at work, retouching their pictures, I was a good deal puzzled at the very opposite advice I received from authorities equally high. North- cote came in, and it was the only time I ever saw him at the Academy. He had a large picture there, and not hung in the best of places, at which he was much dissatisfied. I told him of my difficulties, and that Wilkie and Lawrence had just given me extraordinary advice. " Everybody," he said, " will advise you to do what he himself Avould do, but you are to consider and judge for yourself whether you are likely to do it as he would, and if not you may spoil your picture." Northcote then complained to Phillips of the ill-usage he had received from the Academy, and said, " I have scarcely ever had a picture well hung. I wish I had never belonged to you." Phillips said, laughing, " We can turn you out." CHAP. III.] FLAXMAN AND LAWRENCE. 47 " The sooner you do so the better ; only think of the men you have turned out ; you turned out Sir Joshua, you turned out Barry, and you turned out West ; and I shall be very glad to make a fourth in such company." The truth is, Sir Joshua and West had each resigned the chair for a short time, in consequence of some displeasure with the Academy ; and therefore what Northcote said was more ingenious than true ; but it was not a bad specimen of his readiness in reply. When Mr. Shee paid him some compliments, with the adroit- ness which was natural to him, Northcote said, " Very well, indeed ; you are just the man to write a tragedy, you know how to make a speech." At another time, Northcote complimented Shee in his own peculiar manner by saying, " You should have been in Parliament instead of the Academy." I lived still in Buckingham Place, Fitzroy Square, and was, therefore, a very near neighbour to Flaxman, whose studio I often visited. I remember seeing there some beautiful casts, in plaster of Paris, from real flowers, branches of laurel, ivy, &c. Being attached to backgrounds, they had the appearance of ex- quisite carvings in high relief. The firmer flowers and leaves were perfectly moulded, as the lily, laurels, &c. ; and even roses were cast with surprising success. Flaxman was always very kind in giving me his advice ; but his manner was almost painfully polite ; he would say, " If I might presume to suggest," &c. In this he resembled Lawrence, and such a manner had the effect, though not intended, of keeping people at a distance. I felt that it would be difficult to become intimate either with Flaxman or Lawrence. Though Flaxman's art is in a great degree eclectic, yet he had, unquestionably, an exquisite feeling, entirely his own, for what- ever is most graceful in nature. His imitation of the antique, and of early Italian art, occasionally betrayed him into a manner somewhat pedantic ; yet it is not that mere mimicry which the Germans of the present day (I am writing in 1843), have fallen into. He imitated classical art as N. Poussin did, with constant reference to nature. Allston told me that, having complimented Flaxman on his designs from Homer, Dante, &c, the latter said, 48 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. III. " I will now show you the sources of many of them," and he laid before him a great number of sketches from nature, of accidental groups, attitudes, &c, which he had seen in the streets, and in rooms. I have myself seen Flaxman stop in the street to make a sketch of some attitude that struck him. There can be no doubt that his outlines, particularly the series from Dante, led the way to what the Germans are now doing. They began by outlines from Faust, &c, and are now all becoming little children in art, as they seem to fancy, by imitating the infancy of the Italian schools. But they forget that the charms of infancy cannot be assumed. Hence, though their works, by a mere external re- semblance to early art, may deceive the superficial, all who are really capable of separating that which is the essence, from that which only belongs to the accidents of the age, the country, &c, must see that nothing can, in reality, be less like the art of Giotto, and the infancy of Raphael's style, than what the Germans seem almost desirous of palming on the world for veritable designs by those masters. The mantle of Raphael has not yet fallen among them. Flaxman and Stothard would have been among the foremost artists in the days of Julius II. and Leo X., but England, in the times of George III. and IV., was utterly unworthy of them. The British aristocracy, with the exception of Lord Egremont, patronised Canova, and almost every English sculptor rather than Flaxman, the greatest of all. He was, indeed, above their com- prehension, and thus he found time, while his chisel was unem- ployed, for his outline compositions ; works which are looked to as a mine of wealth by all European sculptors, and from which painters as well as sculptors, British and foreign, have largely helped themselves. Canova, who was a noble-minded man, took every opportunity of pointing out the merits of Flaxman to the English nobility while they were crowding his studio, and giving him commissions which he was sometimes obliged to refuse. " You English," he said, " see with your ears." * Lord Egremont, an exception to this reproach, employed Flax- man on his noble group of the Archangel Michael piercing Satan, * This I was told by Mr. Rogers. CHAP. III.] FLAXMAN AND CHANTREY. 40 and on a beautiful figure of a pastoral Apollo ; but whatever other patronage he may have received from the nobility, it was miser- ably scanty for so great a genius. What must foreigners think who visit London (and who, if they have any taste, must be well acquainted with the powers of Flaxman) when they walk through our streets and squares, and meet with no work of his hand ex- cepting only one of the statues and the bas-reliefs in front of Covent Garden Theatre, for which his country is indebted solely to the private regard of the architect, and John Kemble, for Flaxman ? I have been told by Mr. Baily, that Flaxman would not have been employed on the statue of Nelson for St. Paul's, had it not been that the hero himself was acquainted with him, and was known to have said, " If ever there should be a statue erected of me, I hope, Flaxman, you will carve it." He had competed unsuccessfully for the monument in St. Paul's, and when, for the reason mentioned, it was agreed by the committee of taste that he should make the statue of Nelson, he was desired to work from Westmacott's design, which the committee preferred to his own ! ! He submitted, but never competed again. Chantrey was wiser, and never competed on any occasion. As a man, he was as dif- ferent from Flaxman in manner as in appearance. Handsome (his mouth exceedingly beautiful), with a bluff John Bull look, and a bluntness of manner not quite pleasant, but playful, witty, and in general good natured. His strong native sense and tact compensated for his entire want of book learning. He was an admirable speaker ; always clear, forcible, and to the purpose, with not a word too many or too few, the effect of what he said being aided by a fine, deep voice. With respect to his art, he seems to me the Reynolds of por- trait sculpture. Excepting the first portrait Lawrence painted of West, and the one he painted of the Duke of Wellington for Sir P. Peel, all the portraits I have seen by his hand are far sur- passed by* Chantrey 's busts, whenever the same people sat to both. It is much to be regretted that Chantrey made so few busts of women. One I remember of a German princess, a re- lation, I think, of Queen Adelaide, was exceedingly lovely. It 4 50 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [CHAP. III. was posthumous, and made from a cast taken after death. The bust of Queen Victoria I thought also a charming work. It is saying but little for it, that it is by far the best yet made. Chantrey often showed his powers most when he had an in- different subject. His bust of William IV. appeared to me a great triumph of art. He managed to preserve a very strong likeness, and without gross flattery contrived to give a kingly air to it, of which certainly honest King William had very little. I had painted a portrait of a nobleman, of whom Chantrey had just made a bust, and I asked him if I could do anything to make my picture more like* He had not formed a very high opinion of the inside of his Lordship's head, and pointing to the ears, he said, " Make them longer." The friends of a lad who had determined on applying himself to sculpture, consulted me about placing him with a master. I recommended Chantrey, and meeting him a day or two afterwards in the Antique School at the Academy, I asked him if he took pupils. u No ; why do you ask ? " I told him that a young friend of mine would be glad to study with him. " I can teach him nothing," he said, " let him come here." " He does, but how is he to learn the use of the chisel ? " " Any stone mason can teach him that better than I can. He must become a workman before he can be a sculptor. One great fault of our sculptors is that few of them are workmen." Edwin Landseer, the best of mimics, gave a capital specimen of Chan trey's manner, and at Chantrey's own table. Dining at his house with a large party, after the cloth was removed from the beautifully polished mahogany — Chantrey's furniture was all beautiful — Landseer's attention was called by him to the re- flections, in the table, of the company, furniture, lamps, &c. " Come and sit in my place and study perspective," said our host, and went himself to the fire. As soon as Landseer was seated in Chantrey's chair, he turned round, and imitating his voice and manner, said to him, " Come young man, you think yourself ornamental ; now make yourself useful, and ring the bell." Chantrey did as he was desired — the butler appeared, and was perfectly bewildered at hearing his master's voice, from CHAP. III.] CHANTEEY. .51 the head of the table, order more claret, while he saw him stand- ing before the fire. The only time I ever met Lord Jeffrey, was at Chantrey's. I sat next to him at dinner, and found him delightful. I also met Colonel Gurwood there. He could talk of nothing but the Duke of Wellington. Speaking of the publication of his Dispatches, he said, " I have unveiled a great man to the world. He is the greatest creature God Almighty ever created. But he don't write so well now as he did, for he thinks every thing he writes will be printed, and he takes pains." If proof were wanted of the superiority of Chantrey's mind, it would be found in the fact that his most intimate associates were such men as Davy and Wollaston ; and that such men delighted in his conversation. He, on the other hand, delighted to learn from them, for, like every artist who deserves the title of an artist, he was greatly interested in all natural science. On such sub- jects, I have so often heard him quote Davy and Wollaston, that I feel sure nothing he heard them say was lost on him. If Chantrey's busts possess many of the highest qualities of the portraits of Reynolds, Jackson's best pictures approach them the nearest in colour. The first time I remember to have seen Jackson was in the autumn of 1813, and at the British Institution, where we were at the same time engaged in copying the same picture, the por- trait of John Hunter, by Sir Joshua Reynolds. I knew nothing then of Jackson's merits as a portrait painter, and was not dis- posed to rate him highly from what I saw of his mode of proceed- ing at the Institution. He seemed to me to be going on very much at random, smearing asphaltum and lake over his canvass in what I thought a very unartistlike manner, and I fancied my copy would be much the best of the two. In short, I formed an opinion of Jackson as opposite as possible to that which he really deserved. I supposed him to be a conceited fellow, who affected singularity not only as an artist, but as a man, for at that time he wore knee breeches with brown silk stockings. Breeches were then sometimes worn, but the brown stockings puzzled me. Many years afterwards, I saw his copy of the John Hunter at the house of Sir Charles Bell, and had I not been told what it 52 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. III. was, I might have mistaken it for the original. Still later in life, I met with my own copy. There is certainly no danger that it will ever pass for a work of Reynolds. I afterwards learned to value Jackson's art as well as himself. As a man, he was most amiable. It seemed scarcely possible that the serenity of his tem- per could be ruffled. I saw him often, but I never saw him in an ill humour under any circumstances. Though inclined to taci- turnity, he had a great deal of natural drollery, and the soundness of his sense may be shown by a single sentence, whether it origi- nated with him or whether he quoted it. " Whatever is worth doing," he said, " for the sake of example, must be worth doing for its own sake." What a contrast is this to the sophistry of Horace Walpole, who says, " I go to church sometimes in order to induce my servants to go to church. I am no hypocrite. I do not go in order to persuade them to believe what I do not believe myself. A good moral sermon may instruct and benefit them. I only set them an example of listening, not of believ- ing." I often spent my Sundays at Walthamstow, in the family of William Dillwyn, a venerable Quaker gentleman. He was from Philadelphia, and had known West before he left America ; and it was from him I heard the singular story of the first meeting between John West and his eldest son, who had never seen each other till the latter was fifty years of age. A strict adherence to the rules of his sect had not quenched the natural vivacity of Mr. Dillwyn. He had known Dr. Franklin, who carried him one day to the gallery of the House of Commons. As soon as they were seated, the Doctor whispered to him that a gentleman, immedi- ately before them, was Garrick. The great actor had a friend with him, and Mr. Dillwyn overheard snatches of his conversa- tion. On Garrick being asked how it was that with his abilities he had never thought of getting into Parliament, he said, " I have quite farce enough at my own house." Mr. Dillwyn's son told me that his father, in his younger days, was in a stage coach with a party of military officers. One of them, a pert, effeminate, young dandy, undertook to quiz the plain Quaker, and after some indifferent jokes, asked him at an inn where they stopped, to hold his sword for a minute, supposing CHAP. III.] DILLWYN, THE QUAKER. 53 he would consider it an abomination to touch it. Mr. Dillwyn, however, eying the young man from head to foot said, " As I believe from thy appearance it has never shed human blood, and is not in the least likely to do so, I have not the smallest objection." CHAPTER IV. Wilkie — Visit to Scotland — Visit to Abbotsford — Anecdote of Mrs. Coutts — Walter Scott at Home — Visit to Edinburgh. Lord Egremont had asked Phillips to go fifty miles into the country to make a sketch of one of his grandchildren, who was at the point of death. Phillips, unable to leave town, proposed that I should go, and this circumstance first made me known to Lord Egremont. When I reached the house of Colonel Wynd- ham, the father of the little girl, she had just died. I sat up all night, making sketches from her very beautiful face, and after- wards painted a small picture from them. When Lord Egremont asked me what he was to pay for it, I said twenty guineas. " But your travelling expenses must be paid." I told him they were five guineas, as I had posted to the house, and he immediately wrote me a cheque for fifty. Soon after this he desired me to paint him a picture, leaving the subject and size to my own choice, and I painted " Sancho Panza in the Apartment of the Duchess." A few days before the picture went to the Exhibition Wilkie called on me, and, after paying me some compliments, with which I was greatly delighted, as coming from him, he said : " I think you may improve your picture very much by giving it more depth and richness of tone. Don't be afraid of glazing. The practice of our artists is running too much into a light and vapid style which will, in the end, ruin the art. I am trying, in my own pictures, to avoid this as much as possible, and I should be glad to talk you over. I have a pic- ture by Isaac Ostade, which has exactly the qualities I should like to see you give to this. Can you come to Kensington this afternoon and look at it, for there is no time to be lost ? " I said I would gladly do so, and as Newton intended to call on him to chap, iv.] WILEIE. 55 see the pictures he was about to send to the exhibition, I would ask him to go with me. " No," said Wilkie, " I would rather see him at some other time ; I can talk better to one than to two." I went, and saw his beautiful little picture from Allan Ramsay's " Gentle Shepherd," of Jenny and Peggy dressing themselves, a fine specimen of richness and depth of chiaroscuro. Indeed, but for Wilkie's modesty, he might just as well have explained to me all his notions of tone and effect from this picture as from the Isaac Ostade. But he dwelt eloquently on the beauties of the latter, and concluded by exclaiming, in a voice of despair, " Are we never to see this done again ? " I might have answered, " No ; but we may see something equally good though different in kind, as your own pictures prove. No form of art has ever been ex- actly repeated with success." But I was more disposed to listen with respect to all he said than to interrupt him, even with a com- pliment. I felt the distance between us as artists, and I felt greatly obliged by his taking the trouble to help me where I knew I wanted help. I was struck with the warmth, earnestness, and animation of his manner, so unlike anything I had before observed in him, and I felt convinced that he, like all first-rate men, had nothing more seriously at heart than the advance of every member of his profession. As well, indeed, might we ex- pect to find a sincerely religious man indifferent to the advance- ment of piety, as to meet with a really great artist unconcerned for the general advancement of art. It would be absurd to claim for my own profession any exemption from the infirmities of hu- man nature, — and it must be admitted that the greatest painters, and very good men among them, have not been free from jeal- ousies of their contemporaries, — but, to judge from my own ex- perience, I should say that bad feelings rankle most among the inferior artists, where their effects, from the comparative obscurity of the individuals, are least known or noticed. I remember an amateur painter making a great noise in the hall of the Academy, during the arrangement of an exhibition, because he had heard that his picture was not well hung. Constable and I went down to pacify him. He accused several of the members of jealousy, and said, " I cannot but feel as I do, for painting is a passion with me." " Yes," said Constable, " and a bad passion." 50 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [chap. IV. While my picture of " Sancho and the Duchess " was in the Exhibition, Lord Egremont called on me and asked if I had re- ceived any commission for a similar picture. I told him I had not, and he said : " Then paint me a companion to it, and if any- body should wish to have it, let it go, and paint me another. I wish to keep you employed on such subjects instead of portraits." Soon after this I received commissions for fancy subjects from Lord Essex, the Duke of Bedford, and others, and Lord Egre- mont desired me to execute them and reserve the one he had given me until I should be in want of employment. In the autumn of 1824 I visited Scotland for the purpose of painting a portrait of Sir Walter Scott for Mr. Ticknor of Bos- ton. Newton had gone with Irving on an excursion, which he afterwards extended to Scotland, and as Edwin Landseer was also bound for the north, he and I left London together, in the steamboat, for Edinburgh. I there found Newton, and, as I learned that Sir Walter was not at Abbotsford, we agreed to make a short trip to the Highlands. We passed through Glas- gow, visited Loch Lomond and Loch Katrine, whence we walked across the mountains to Loch Earn, to be present at an annual meeting of Highlanders, under the patronage of Lord Gwydyr, at which prizes were distributed to the best performers on the bagpipes, the best dancers, broadswordsmen, &c. It was a bright fresh autumnal morning when we left Loch Earn head for the other end of the lake, a distance of seven miles, in a large row-boat, in which, besides ourselves, were a number of Highlanders — men, women, and children. As we passed down the lake, the rowers amused us with stories of the fairies that inhabited its shores ; these stories being matters of serious belief with them. Occasionally we heard the distant sound of bagpipes, and as they neared us the hills were enlivened by the appearance of parties of Highlanders in full costume, each headed by a piper, and all bound for the place of rendezvous. This little voyage afforded us an enjoyment of the Highlands, with all that is native to them, in perfection. The amusement of the games which we afterwards witnessed was nothing to the delight of gliding gently down the clear smooth lake with such accompaniments. CHAP. IV.] VISIT TO ABBOTSFORD. 57 We afterwards visited Stirling and Ayr ; the latter being to me the most interesting spot in Scotland, associated as the town itself and the scenery of its neighbourhood is with Burns. A lover of Burns (and who does not love him) may imagine the feelings with which we crossed the " Brigs of Ayr," listened to " the drowsie donjon clock," looked up to Wallace Tower, visited the cottage in which the bard was born, and Kirk Alloway, and strolled by the side of the " Bonny Doon," where Burns had so often strayed, composing his enchanting songs. I bathed in its exquisitely clear stream. " What are those mountains ? " I asked of an old man, who said he had often had a gill of whiskey with Burns. They were " the Cumnock Hills." " What a delightful companion Burns must have been." " Oh, not at all ; he was a silly chiel ; but his brother Gilbert was quite a gentleman — like you," he said, looking at Newton, whose appearance and manner were remarkably good. A Scotch gardener told me that he knew the original Tam-o'- Shanter. I forget his name, but he was very proud of being immortalized by Burns, though he said that part of the poem in which his wife rates him for his drunkenness, was " a lee ; for there never was a better-tempered woman, and she never scolded me in a' her life." From Ayr I returned direct to Edinburgh, where I left New- ton, and proceeded to Abbotsford. I carried from John Murray to Sir Walter a mourning ring, which had been left to him by Lord Byron. The following is a quotation from a letter I wrote from Abbots- ford : " The Countess of Compton, her mother (Mrs. Clephane), and her two sisters, have been here for the last three days. Mr. and Mrs. Terry are here : Lady Alvanley and her two daughters arrived yesterday to dinner : and late in the evening came Mrs. Coutts, attended by a lady, a secretary, a doctor, and I don't know how many servants. Mr. Stewart Rose is also here. This list will give you some notion of the hospitalities of Abbotsford. Mr. Canning is expected, but not till October, and so I shall not see him. I have had three sittings from Sir Walter, and the general opinion is that the portrait will be like." During one of these sittings, there came on a thunder-storm ; 58 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. IV. and as the peals followed more and more closely the flashes of lightning, Scott became uneasy, and at last rose from his chair, saying, " I must go to Lady Scott, she is always frightened when it thunders." It is curious that the only circumstance connected with Scott and related by Lockhart, of which I was a witness, is incorrectly stated in his Life of Sir Walter. Lockhart places Mrs. Coutts's visit to .Abbotsford in 1825, instead of 1824; and tells us she was accompanied by the Duke of St. Albans and one of his grace's sisters, and by " a brace of physicians," evidently con- founding this visit with one she paid to Sir Walter in Edinburgh in the following year, when the Duke and one of his sisters were of her party, and when she may have had two physicians, which was certainly not the case when she was at Abbotsford in 1824. But Lockhart's chief inaccuracy is in the account he gives of the ill-manners of some of Scott's lady visitors towards Mrs. Coutts, and the result. After saying that they contrived to mor- tify her " without doing or saying anything that could expose them to the charge of actual incivility," he tells us that Sir Wal- ter remonstrated with the "youngest, gayest, and cleverest (a lovely Marchioness)," that she took the remonstrance in good part, promised better behaviour, and that she and the rest directly became as civil to Mrs. Coutts as they had before been the re- verse ; that Mrs. Coutts was pacified, and " stayed her three days." Now I have no doubt Sir Walter did remonstrate with the beautiful Lady Compton (who was not then a Marchioness), for I remember that Lady Compton was very polite to Mrs. Coutts in the evening, and sat down to the piano to accompany her in a song which she made an ineffectual attempt to sing, but could not utter a note. Her wounded spirit, in fact, was not healed ; and instead of staying " her three days," she slept at Abbotsford but one night, after the night of her arrival, and went away the next morning. Stuart Newton was at Abbotsford at the time. About a year afterwards he was taken by a friend to one of Mrs. Coutts's fetes at Holly Lodge, and on saying that he had " had the honour of meeting her at Sir Walter Scott's," she said, " Oh ! I remember, chap, iv.] ANECDOTE OF MRS. COUTTS. §9 it was when those horrible women were there. Sir Walter was very kind, and did all in his power, but I could not stay in the house with them." I believe the rudeness Mrs. Coutts suffered at Abbotsford was chiefly occasioned by what had occurred before she came. She was expected the day before she did arrive ; the dinner hour, seven o'clock, came, but not Mrs. Coutts ; at first, nobody could feel aggrieved that Sir Walter would not allow dinner to be served. But no doubt the ladies (two of them titled ladies) thought it too much that dinner was deferred till nine o'clock, and might have been longer postponed, had not a messenger ar- rived from Mrs. Coutts, to say that she was delayed on the road by the want of horses, and could not reach Abbotsford that night. It was not unnatural, therefore, that ladies, by no means pre- possessed in her favour, and feeling that more deference had been paid her by their host than was due to anything less than Royal- ty, should be somewhat out of humour with her beforehand ; and though this is no excuse for their ill-breeding, it may account for it. Constable, the publisher, spent a day at Abbotsford while I was there. He told Sir Walter that Meg Dodds, a name given to the mistress of an inn halfway between Edinburgh and Ab- botsford, and who was supposed to have furnished the original of that character, said " Sir Walter had ill-obliged her by not giving her notice that so great a lady as Mrs. Coutts was coming, in order that she might be prepared to receive her properly. She was taken by surprise, when she ought to have been informed that the greatest woman in all England was on her way to visit the greatest man in all Scotland ; indeed she might say Sir Walter was the greatest man in the world, now Bonaparte was dead." The following is from one of my letters : — " I am painting in the library. When Sir Walter is seated I always place a chair in the direction in which I wish him to look, which is never long unoccupied by some one of his visitors, who is sure to keep him in conversation. At the other end of the room there is generally a group round the harp or piano. Im- agine how delightful these sittings are to me. " This morning, being Sunday, Sir Walter read the Church GO MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [CHAP. IV. Service to the whole family and his guests, in an impressive man- ner." When I began the portrait, Scott suggested that for the back- ground I should take " Thomas the Rhymer's Glen," one of his favourite haunts. I went with him and Mr. Rose to see it, and when we came near the spot where Thomas was supposed to have met the Queen of the Fairies, Sir "Walter and I dismounted from our ponies, and as the descent into the glen was steep, I offered to help him ; but he declined assistance, saying, he could get along best in his own way ; and, indeed, he displayed more activity than I could have expected, considering his lameness, scrambling down the sides of the glen, often on all fours. He told me that in his youth he had been an adventurous climber, though no one would suppose it, as his lame leg was of scarcely any use to him. The glen was beautiful, and as he rested himself in his favourite seat near a little succession of waterfalls, he said, with a strong emphasis of satisfaction on the two last words, " a poor thing, but mine ow?i" I told him the dimensions of my picture would not admit the scene as a background, as its leading features could not be brought into so small a compass. I might, however, have made a sketch of it with Sir Walter in the spot he loved, and my only excuse for not doing it is that Mr. Rose, who Was too infirm to descend into the glen, was waiting for us above. As we returned, I remember Rose saying he had never known anybody who had read Voltaire's " Henriade " through. Scott replied, " I have read it, and live ; but, indeed, in my youth I read everything." Sir Walter had appropriated to his friend Rose, whose in- firmities were occasioned by paralysis, a sitting-room with a bed- room adjoining it on the ground floor, the latticed windows of which, shaded by flowers, looked into the garden. Here Rose could seclude himself when he liked, and pursue a task Scott had engaged him in, a translation, I think, of Ariosto. Scott thought that some such easy employment of the mind would be service- able to his health. The luxurious table at Abbotsford would, however, have rendered Sir Walter's kind intentions useless, had not Rose practised a rigid system of self-denial. CHAP. IV.] WALTER SCOTT AT HOME. 61 When Lady Scott offered to help him to some rich delicacy, he said — " No, madam, I believe in a hereafter" Rose was able to shoot, with the assistance of his man, Hen- viss, who carried his gun ; and when he went out for a morning's sport, he wore a great coat without sleeves, for the better con- venience of using his arms. His under-coat, differing in colour from the outer one, gave him a very odd appearance, his body being brown and his arms black. Henviss raised the gun to his shoulder for him, and Rose said — " When I fire I never know whether the birds are to fall or myself." But he generally man- aged to kill them notwithstanding his lameness. Henviss was an odd, half-witted fellow, and Scott said he reminded him, more than any man he had ever met with, of the motley fools in Shakespeare. Rose had, in fact, provided Henviss with some sort of antic dress which he made him wear by way of pun- ishment, when he had behaved amiss ; but Henviss took a fancy to it, and would often put it on for his own gratification. He wanted to wear it at Abbotsford, but to this Sir Walter objected, saying — "I have no reputation for wisdom to spare in my own neighbourhood, and I cannot afford to fall lower in the estimation of the country-people by permitting Henviss to be seen about the place in a fool's dress." Rose told many droll stories of Hen- viss ; but, as he related many out of the way things of other people, it was thought these stories owed quite as much to the master as to the man. Lady Anna Maria Elliott, herself a wit, said, after listening for some time to Rose : — " What a great number of very odd people you have known." " I don't know that," he replied. " Well, then, I am very sure all Mr. Rose's acquaintance know one very odd person." During one of Sir Walter's sittings to me, the conversation turned on Quakers, and he was surprised to hear that I had painted the portraits of several, for he thought they objected to pictures, as well as to music. He said, " They must have been what are called wet Quakers." I assured him they were not, but he would have it that " at least, they were damp Quakers." Scott told me he had known a labouring man who was with Burns when he turned up the mouse with his plough. 62 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. IV. Burns's first impulse was to kill it, but checking himself, as his eye followed the little creature, he said, " I'll make that mouse immortal." He mentioned this as an instance of Burns's confi- dence in his own powers. I was much interested by seeing in the library at Abbotsford, an autograph manuscript of " Tarn O'Shanter." There were, either in this MS., or Scott had noted that there were in some other copy, two lines that had never been printed. They oc- curred after " The landlord's laugh was ready chorus: " and ran thus : " The cricket join'd his chirping cry, The kittling chas'd its tail wi' joy." Scott had remarked, in a note, that Burns probably rejected them from the resemblance to Goldsmith's line, — " The cricket chirrup'd on the hearth." He had once seen Burns, and described his eye as remarkably fine ; it was dark, and seemed to dilate when he became excited. I have lately met Major Burns, one of the poet's sons. I looked at him with great interest, which was increased by his modest and unassuming manners, in which I am sure he must have re- sembled his father, whose genius was of too high an order to be accompanied by any personal assumption or display. While strolling with Sir Walter about his own grounds, a pleasure I often enjoyed, he would frequently stop and point out exactly that object or effect that would strike the eye of a painter. He said he always liked to have a dog with him in his walks, if for nothing else but to furnish a living object in the foreground of the picture ; and he noticed to me, when we were among the hills, how much interest was given to the scene by the occasional appearance of his black greyhound, Hamlet, at unexpected points. He talked of scenery as he wrote of it — like a painter ; and yet for pictures, as works of art, he had little or no taste, nor did he pretend to any. To him they were interesting merely as representing some particular scene, person, or event ; and very moderate merit in their execution contented him. There were things hanging on the walls of his dining-room, which no eye CHAP. IV.] WALTER SCOTT AT HOME. 63 possessing sensibility to what is excellent in art could have en- dured. In this respect his house presented a striking con- trast to that of Mr. Rogers, where nothing met the eye which was not of high excellence. I am inclined to think that in music also, Scott's enjoyment arose chiefly from the associations called up by the air, or the words of a song. I have seen him stand beside the piano or harp when Lady Compton, Miss Clephane, or Mrs. Lockhart were playing Highland music, or a military march, his head and whole figure slightly moving in unison with the instrument, and with an expression in his face of inward delight, that told, more plainly than any words could tell, how thoroughly he relished the performance. He had kept a piper, but this personage was dismissed before the time of which I am writing : I believe for drunkenness. Sir Walter, as might be supposed, was fond of the bagpipe, and contended that it was really a fine instrument, independently of all national asso- ciations. His conversation was enriched with quotations, often made highly humorous by their application. I remember his comparing the sound of the dinner-bell, for which, he said, he had " a very quick ear," to " the sweet south, That breathes upon a bank of violets, Stealing and giving odour." There was more benevolence expressed in Scott's face than is given in any portrait of him ; and I am sure there was much in his heart. It showed itself in little daily acts of quiet kind- ness to everybody about him. As an instance, I may mention that there was a young man, educated for the Church, but as yet without a curacy, living at Abbotsford. He was so deaf as to be obliged to use an ear-trumpet. Sir Walter always placed him at his side at dinner ; and when anything was said that he thought would interest Mr. , he turned to him, and dropped it into his trumpet. " Look at Scott," Newton whispered to me, " drop- ping something into 's charity -box." I asked Sir Walter where I should be likely to meet with a haggis. " I don't know a more likely place than the house you are in," he said; and the next day a haggis appeared on the 04 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. IV. table. It was placed before him, and he greeted it with the first lines of Burns's address to the " Chieftain of the Pudding Race." He repeated them with great effect ; and at the words " Weel are ye worthy of a grace As lang 's my arm," he extended his arm over the haggis. It was curious that Mr. Leycester Adolphus's " Letter to Rich- ard Hcber," so satisfactorily proving Scott to be the author of the Waverley Novels, was lying on the table of the Abbotsford Library at that time, when the novels were never mentioned in Scott's presence. This admirable essay not only carries convic- tion on the point it was written to establish, but contains the best critique on Scott's prose and poetry (for an entirely favourable one) ever written. Sir Walter's old and faithful servant, Tom Purdey, is men- tioned by Lockhart. I made a small whole-length sketch of Tom for Sir Walter. Purdey was in bad health, and his master was much grieved at the thoughts of losing him ; but Tom lived till after the authorship of the novels was acknowledged. Mr. Cadell told me that, as Sir Walter was leaning on Purdey's arm, in one of his walks, Tom said, " Them are fine novels of yours, Sir Walter ; they are just invaluable to me." " I am glad to hear it, Tom." " Yes, sir, for when I have been out all day, hard at work, and come home, vara tired, if I sit down with a pot of por- ter by the fire, and take up one of your novels, I'm asleep di- rectly." Somebody spoke of # clubs, and Scott said, "I belong to many, but I don't frequent them, for there is always a scum of bores floating on the surface of club life. And yet I don't dislike a good bore, for it requires a clever man to be one." He said, " I never knew a man of genius — and I have known many — who could be regular in all his habits, but I have known many a blockhead who could." Cadell told me that, in allusion to the opinion that Lord By- ron's lameness was the occasion of his misanthropy, he said to Scott, " Your temper has not suffered from the same misfortune," and Scott replied, " When I was of the age at which lads like to shine in the eyes of the girls, I have felt some envy, in a ball- CHAP. IV.] VISIT TO EDINBURGH. 65 room, of the young fellows who had the use of their legs ; but I generally found when I was beside the lasses I had the advantage with my tongue." When I left Abbotsford for Edinburgh, Scott gave me a packet for Constable, which, no doubt, contained manuscript. I think he was then writing the " Tales of the Crusaders." At Edinburgh I met with much kind attention from the artists. Wilkie was there, for the purpose of making studies of the Scot- tish Regalia, &c, for his picture of George the Fourth entering Holyrood House, and I was delighted to meet him in the capital of his own country. We talked of Scott and of Burns, and he remarked that it was a fine piece of art in Burns to make an ex- aggerated account of Tarn O'Shanter's excesses dramatically nat- ural, by putting it into the mouth of his angry wife. At the time of which I am writing, my sister Ann was living with me, and as I had the prospect of marrying I had taken a small house in Lisson Grove, which had the convenience of a large painting room attached to it. This had been built by the owner of the house, Mr. Rossi, R.A., for Mr. Haydon, and it was there Haydon painted his " Christ entering Jerusalem." The last letter I received from my sister, while on my visit to Scotland, hastened my return, as it told me she had heard that our mother was dangerously ill. On arriving at my own door, my sister met me in deep mourning. She had been sorrowing at home, while I had been revelling in enjoyment. My mother died on the 24th July, aged fifty-seven, at the house of my brother, Captain Leslie, at West Point. My sister heard this soon after I went to Scotland ; but did not acquaint me with it, knowing that it would defeat the object for which I had gone. 5 CHAPTER V. Lord Holland — Lord Egremont — Anecdote of Lord Egremont — Petworth — The Rev. Sidney Smith — Anecdotes of Sidney Smith — Constable, the Painter — Walter Scott in London — Alfred and John Chalon. On the 11th April, 1825, I was married ; and in the course of the same year I received a visit from my third sister Mrs. Henry Carey, her husband, and his sister Maria. I had not seen my sister Carey for fourteen years, and was greatly struck with the uncommon sweetness of her face and manner. I had not, when a boy, thought her even pretty, but she now appeared to me beautiful. I was perhaps by this time a better judge of beauty. Her figure was slight and petite, her features not regular, and her complexion dark, though very clear. But her eyes were lovely, full and grey, with long black lashes ; she had beautiful dimples ; and at all times an expression of so much good sense, whether joyous or sad, and manners so perfectly natural and en- gaging, that I thought her one of the most charming women I had ever seen. She had always been a favourite with my brother and myself, but I had never entirely appreciated her till, after our long separation, we met again as new acquaintances. My rela- tions made a short excursion in England through some of the scenes my wife and I had visited on our wedding excursion ; and, after a trip to Paris, they returned to America, taking my sister Ann with them. Not long before my marriage, I had been introduced to Lord Holland. I painted small portraits of his lordship, of his beau- tiful daughter Mary (now Lady Lilford), and of Lady Affleck (Lady Holland's mother), for Lady Holland. These were all painted at Holland House ; and from that time I had frequent opportunities of being present at the delightful breakfast and CHAP. V.] LOKD HOLLAND. 07 dinner parties that took place every day in that fine old mansion. Among the guests whom I met there most often, were Sir James Mackintosh, Mr. Richard Sharpe, Mr. Rogers, Mr. Luttrell, and Mr. Thomas Moore. Lord Holland was, without any exception, the very best tem- pered man I have ever known. How much more he was than merely a good-tempered man, has been, and will no doubt again be, recorded by persons far better able than I am to describe him. Of the grace with which he could confer a favour, the following letter addressed to me, affords a specimen. It enclosed a cheque for one hundred guineas for the portraits I had painted of himself and of his daughter, that sum being forty guineas more than I expected to receive. " 10th June, 1829. " Dear Sir, " When you were so good as to undertake to paint a portrait of my daughter, I understood from Lord Egremont that you charged only thirty guineas for works of that nature and size. But after the great trouble you have taken, and the great success you have had in those you have painted for me, I am really ashamed of repaying such works at so low a rate ; and I hope you will do me the favour of accepting the enclosed for the two pictures finished and framed as you will deliver them to me. The price, even in its amended shape, bears no proportion what- ever to the value I annex to the works ; but it unfortunately does bear a more correct one to the sum that I can with any prudence devote to such objects. " I am, Dear sir, with many thanks, " Your obliged and obedient servant, "Vassall Holland." Lord Holland was fond of talking of his uncle, Charles Fox, and repeating his bon mots. But Lord Holland had a wit's relish for wit. When Stuart the painter died, a eulogium on his char- acter appeared in one of the American papers, in which it was said that he left the brightest prospects in England, and returned to his own country, from his admiration of her new institutions, 68 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [chap. v. and a desire to paint the portrait of Washington. On hearing this, Sir Thomas Lawrence said : " I knew Stuart well ; and I believe the real cause of his leaving England was his having become tired of the inside of some of our prisons." " Well, then," said Lord Holland, " after all, it was his love of freedom that took him to America." A saying that perhaps was invented for Lady Holland, is still so like her, and so good, that I will put it down. When Moore's " Lalla Rookh " appeared, she is reported to have said to him : " Mr. Moore, I don't intend to read your Larry O'fiourke, I don't like Irish stories." She was hard to please in all kinds of stories ; few people told them as well as she did. In the autumn of 1826, Lord Egremont invited Mrs. Leslie and myself to Petworth, where we spent a month. From that time to the end of Lord Egremont's life, we were regularly invited to Petworth, with our children, every year. Besides the picture I had painted for him of " Sancho and the Duchess," I painted three others of the same class,* and was engaged on a fourth at the time of his death. I painted also small portraits of his daugh- ters, Lady Burrell and Mrs. King. He was the most munificent, and at the same time the least ostentatious, nobleman in England. Plain spoken, often to a de- gree of bluntness, he never wasted words, nor would he let others waste words on him. After conferring the greatest favours, he was out of the room before there was time to thank him. When he first noticed me, he had almost entirely retired from London, living at Petworth, and benefiting the people about him, in every way in his power. His personal habits were the most simple possible; and his manner naturally shy and retiring. He might easily be mis- taken, by those who knew him but slightly, for a proud person ; but, as Sir William Beechey said of him, he " had more 4 put-up- ability ' than almost any other man." He would bear a great deal before he would take the trouble to be angry ; but when angry it was to the purpose, and I have known him, in more than * Scene from the " Taming of the Shrew;" Gulliver's introduction to the Queen of Brobdignag; Charles II. at Tillietudlem Castle, from " Old Mor- tality." — Ed. CHAP. V.] LORD EGREMONT. 69 one instance, order persons to leave his house, who, encouraged by his good-nature and the easy footing on which they found themselves at Petworth, had forgotten where they were, and be- haved as if that noble mansion were but a great hotel. His liveries were extremely plain, and there were neither arms nor coronet on any of his carriages. Wilkie was at Petworth during one of our visits, and Lord Egremont took him and me, one morning, to Chichester. On the way, he stopped to show us Goodwood ; but the Duke and Duchess of Richmond being from home, he asked for the housekeeper. The servants did not know him, and we were kept waiting for a quarter of an hour in the hall. Lord Egremont showed some impatience, ordered his foot- man to ring the bell again, and said : " I would go away, only they will think we are a parcel of thieves." He had some busi- ness to transact at Chichester ; but one of his objects was to show us a young girl, the daughter of an upholsterer, who was devoted to painting, and considered to be a genius by her friends. She was not at home ; but her mother said she could soon be found, " if his lordship would have the goodness to wait a short time." The young lady soon appeared, breathless and exhausted with running. Lord Egremont mentioned our names, and she said, looking up to Wilkie with an expression of great re- spect, " Oh, sir ! it was but yesterday I had your head in my hands." This puzzled him, as he did not know she was a phre- nologist. " And what bumps did you find ? " said Lord Egremont. " The organ of veneration, very large," was her answer ; and Wilkie, making her a profound bow, said : " Madam, I have a great veneration for genius." She showed us an unfinished picture from " The Bride of Lam- mermoor." The figure of Lucy Ashton was completed, and, she told us, was the portrait of a young friend of hers ; but Ravens- wood was without a head, and this she explained by saying, " there are no handsome men in Chichester. But," she con- tinued, her countenance brightening, "the Tenth* are expected here soon." All this was uttered with an air so perfectly simple and innor * A regiment noted for its handsome officers. 70 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. v. cent, that it was the more amusing, and Lord Egremont was highly diverted. As his lordship, from that " put-up-a Jj7% " of his character which Beechey noticed, seldom changed his servants, some of the upper ones were as old as himself ; and these not being in livery, and his own dress, in the morning, being very plain, he was some- times by strangers mistaken for one of them. This happened with a maid of one of his lady guests, who had not been at Pet- worth before. She met him, crossing the hall, as the bell was ringing for the servants' dinner, and said : " Come, old gentle- man, you and I will go to dinner together, for I can't find my way in this great house." He gave her his arm, and led her to the room where the other maids were assembled at their table, and said : " You dine here, I don't dine till seven o'clock." He was very fond of children, and while he was dressing, his grandchildren were generally brought into his room. He asked for ours at the same time, and they always came away each with a sugar-plum, or some other little present. On matters of art Lord Egremont thought for himself; and his remarks were worth remembering. He said to me : " I look upon Raphael and Hogarth as the two greatest painters that ever lived." When the picture of the "Vision of St. Jerome," by Parmegiano, now in the National Gallery, was bought for a large sum by the Directors of the British Institution, Lord Egremont, who happened to be in London, called on me, and asked me if I had a catalogue of the British Institution. " I want to see," he said, " who are the men who have given so much money for that broken-backed St. John. A poor way, I think, of encouraging the art." The following is one of his letters relating to a picture he wished me to paint as a companion to " Sancho and the Duchess : " "Dear Sir, " You said that you would show me a design when you came to. Petworth, and I wish to explain that, by a companion picture, I did not mean to confine you to the story of Don Quix- ote. On the contrary, I have never seen any representation of CHAP. V.] PETWORTH. 71 the Don that satisfied me, and I believe that it is impossible to represent all the absurdity and ridicule of his character, and at the same time the dignity of his mind, and the grandeur of his sentiments, by painting only, without the addition of language. " Ever yours truly, &c. " Egremont." The kind manner in which we were invited to Petworth will be seen in the following note, in answer to one which I wrote declining an invitation, in consequence of our having spent as much time as I could then spare from home at Brighton. My letter accompanied a picture I had painted. " Dear Sir, " The picture is quite safe, and wants nothing. I hope you have some great works in hand, but whenever you feel an inclination for some country air for your children, I hope you will give the preference to Petworth, where you will find me at any time, and always happy to see you. " Ever truly yours, " Egremont." " Petworth, August Uth, 1832." It was impossible to move many steps in the town of Petworth without meeting with something to remind one of the benevolent feelings of him who might be called its king. Mr. Sockett, the rector, pointed out to me on a tomb this epitaph, written by Lord Egremont : — Here lieth the Body of WILLIAM ANDRE, A man of the most blameless conduct, and the most inoffensive manners. To his professional skill hundreds have been indebted for health and life. From his hands thousands have received, by Vaccination, security against that most destructive of all diseases, the small-pox. Reader, if thou art a stranger, learn that these benefits were gratuitously conferred ; if thou art a neighbour, remember them with gratitude, and respect his tomb. He died Dec. 4, 1807, Aged 64 Years. I at this time became acquainted with Sidney Smith, through 72 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. v. my friend Newton. His wit and humour were always unpremed- itated, and seemed not so much the result of efforts to amuse, as the overflowing of a mind full of imagery, instantly ready to combine with whatever passed in conversation. His very exag- gerations took away the sting of his most personal witticisms, and I suppose no man was ever so amusing with so little offence ; for those who were the subjects of his jokes were often the most ready to relate them. When a discussion took place among the clergy of St. Paul's, as to the expediency of surrounding the cathedral with a pavement of blocks of wood, Smith said, " If the bishops would lay their heads together, the thing would be done : " and this was so often repeated, and with so much unction, by the Bishop of London, that he was suspected of having invented it. I happened to be in Newton's room when Mr. Smith came in to sit for his portrait. He looked, in the arm chair, very like Newton's picture of Abbot Boniface ; and indeed he suspected Newton of taking a hint for the portly figure of the Abbot from him. " I sit here," he said, " a personification of piety and absti- nence." Newton told me that at a dinner party at Lord Lyndhurst's, at which he was present, the conversation turned on the custom, in India, of widows burning themselves, an instance of which was recent. When the subject was pretty well exhausted, Smith began to defend the practice, asserting that no wife who truly loved her husband could wish to survive him. " But, if Lord Lyndhurst were to die, you would be sorry that Lady Lyndhurst should burn herself." " Lady Lyndhurst," he replied, " would no doubt, as an affec- tionate wife, consider it her duty to burn herself, but it would be our duty to put her out ; and, as the wife of the Lord Chancellor, Lady Lyndhurst should not be put out like an ordinary widow. It should be a state affair. First, a procession of the judges, and then of the lawyers." " But where, Mr. Smith, are the clergy ? " " All gone to congratulate the new Chancellor." At the back of Holland House, a window is distinguished from all the rest by an iron grating over it. This window communi- cates with Lady Holland's bedroom, and she had it grated when CHAP. V.] THE REV. SIDNEY SMITH. 73 she heard of a gentleman and his wife being murdered in their bed by a servant, who entered their room through a back window. Sidney Smith gave another account of this window. " Allen," he said, " keeps a clergyman in confinement there, upon bread and water." Mr. Allen's dislike to the clergy was no secret. I met Sidney Smith at a dinner party at Mr. Rogers's. Sid- ney's brother was there, and told us of his having been at school with the Duke of Wellington, with whom he had the honour of fighting, but the Duke beat him. " He began with you," said Sidney, " and ended with Bonaparte." Mr. Luttrell mentioned an Irish clergyman who was much offended at being called a "pluralist" and said, " if you don't take care you will find me a duelist" Smith took this up, and said, " I suppose there is scarcely a clergyman in Ireland who has not been out" I am told they settle these matters when the afternoon's service is over. I have seen a parson's challenge : — " Sir, meet me on the first Sunday after the Epiphany." I was greatly amused with him at a large evening party at Mrs. Bates's house. He had been suffering from gout, and re- mained seated near the door, watching the arrivals of the guests, and their reception by the hostess. " Is it possible," he said to her, " that you know all these people ? " " Oh, no ! " " Well, then, you do it remarkably well, for you not only seem to know them all, but to love them all. Can you tell an American at first sight ? I'm sure I can't." And then, observing a lady with an uncommonly splendid turban on her head, he added, " I should say there is a bit of U. S." — and he happened to be right. Many things were invented for him which he never said, among them the story of Landseer asking to paint him, and his reply — " Is thy servant a dog that he should do this thing ? " This was in the newspapers, and Sidney Smith meeting Land- seer in the Park, said : — " Have you seen our little joke in the papers ? " " Are you disposed to acknowledge it ? " " I have no objection." Soon after his pamphlet appeared against American repudia- tion, my friend, Captain Morgan, arrived, and brought from New York some very fine apples. I suggested to him to send a barrel 74 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. v. to Sidney Smith, and beg his acceptance of them as his share of the American debt. Morgan received two notes in reply. The first is published, and the second ran thus — " Sir, When I told my company that your apples came from a solvent State, they were eaten with great applause." He enclosed his poetical receipt for a salad. Sidney Smith, after travelling for some hours in a stage coach with one other passenger only, a lady, said, as he was about to leave the coach : " We have been some time together, and I dare say you think me a very odd fellow, and would like to know who I am." " Indeed, sir, I should." " Well then, madam," he said, as the coach stopped, and he was getting out, " I must inform you that I am the stout gentle- man who was seen by Mr. Washington Irving's nervous friend." Mr. Rogers told me that Smith received invitations to dine with Whitbread and with some peer at the same time. He accepted Whitbread's, and wrote to the peer that he " was engaged to dine with the great fermentator in Chi swell Street." But, putting his answers into the wrong covers, his excuse to the peer went to the brewer, and Lady Elizabeth Whitbread replied, " The great fer- mentator is much obliged to Mr. Smith for giving him the prefer- ence." He answered, " I have received your ladyship's note, and kill myself on the spot." Edwin Landseer said to him : " With your love of humour, it must be a great act of self-denial to abstain the theatres." " The managers," he repjied, " are very polite ; they send me free admissions, which I can't use ; and, in return, I send them free admissions to St. Paul's." Like Sterne's Yorick, Sidney Smith has been thought to in- dulge too much in a levity unbecoming a clergyman, and by some people the sincerity of his faith has been, like Yorick's, doubted. It is true he assumed no outward garb of sanctity ; and if to be a Christian, it be necessary to be a Methodist, he was not one. But those who knew him most intimately, speak of him as not neg- chap, v.] ANECDOTES OF SIDNEY SMITH. 75 lecting any of his serious duties ; and Lady Bell, who soon after the death of her husband passed some time with his family at his living, spoke in the highest terms of his active benevolence among his parishioners. It must be remembered, also, how constantly his wit was employed against enormous abuses, and particularly in the Church ; how constantly he raised his voice in behalf of the poor and hard-working clergy. A friend of mine, who had opportunities of knowing him well, characterised him as " the greatest disperser of humbug that ever lived" I had heard, and with great admiration, Sidney Smith preach, many years before the time of which I am writing. I thought him the best preacher I ever heard, and I know of no better ser- mons than those he has published. There are passages in them tinged with the wit which made him so delightful a companion out of the pulpit, but this does not in the least impair their seriousness. He seems to me, in these discourses, to be at all times equally earnest, eloquent, and sound in the view he takes of his subject, and the more I read them the more I find them to contain. He carried the natural cheerfulness of his mind into his relig- ion. I remember, the first time I heard him preach, — and be- fore I knew anything else of him than that he was an admirable preacher, — he strongly objected to melancholy views of religion. He said with great emphasis, " I want you to enjoy your relig- ion." Among my brother artists, the two with whom I was the most intimately associated, at the time of which I am writing, were Newton and Constable ; but Newton lived so much in society, and .in that respect his habits were so different from my own, that I found myself less with him than with Constable. Of all the painters I have known — and I have been intimate with all the most eminent of my time — Constable was to me the most interesting, both as a man and an artist. I have been told that my great admiration of his pictures arose out of my personal acquaintance with him ; but the reverse was really the case ; my acquaintance with him arose out of my admiration of his pictures. I cultivated his friendship because I liked his art. There are 76 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. v. many estimable men, artists, for whom I have the greatest regard, but of whose works that regard cannot make me an admirer. A lively Quaker lady, a daughter of my excellent friend, Mr. Dillwyn, considered the world as composed of two classes — " those who have souls, and those who have none ; " and wherever she may have drawn the line of separation, I am sure, could she have known Constable as I did, she would have admitted him into the first of these classes. He was not without a body either, and one of genuine flesh and blood, but he put his soul into his art. When he said he " thanked Heaven he had no imagination," he meant only that his imagination did not lead him into what he called " the vacant fields of idealism." Nobody knew better than Constable that without imagination there could be no true art. His manner of expressing himself, in this instance, must, there- fore, be taken in reference to what he saw in the works of many of his contemporaries, who, because they could not imitate nature (the most difficult of all things), pretended to do something bet- ter, — that is, to produce works of imagination. I will say thus much for myself, that I always preferred to associate as much as I could with my superiors. This was another reason for my cultivating the friendship of Constable, and I never felt more happy than when I found he gave it me. He had not a very large circle of friends ; but his friends, like the admirers of his pictures, compensated for their fewness by their sincerity and their warmth. The impression his character made, and the impression his art made, and I may say the impression they did not make, were proofs to me of the truth of Koscoe's remark, that " genius as- similates not with the character of the age." No man more earnestly desired to stand well with the world ; no artist was more solicitous of popularity. He had, as the phrenologists would say, the love of approbation very strongly developed. But he could not conceal his opinions of himself and of others ; and what he said had too much point not to be repeated, and too much truth not to give offence. It is not, then, to be wondered at, that some of his competitors hated him, and most were afraid of him. There was also that about him which led all who had not known him well and long; to consider him an odd fellow, and chap, v.] WALTER SCOTT IN LONDON. 77 a great egotist ; and an egotist he was ; but then, if the expres- sion may be allowed, he was not a selfish egotist. " By self he often meant," as Charles Lamb says of the poet Wither, " a great deal more than self — his friends, his principles, his country, the human race." Few, however, knew or studied him suffi- ciently to perceive this. He was opposed to all cant in art, to all that is merely specious and fashionable, and to all that is false in taste. He followed, and for his future fame he was right in fol- lowing, bis own feelings in the choice of subject and the mode of treatment. With great appearance of docility, he was an uncon- trollable man. He said of himself, " If I were bound with chains I should break them, and with a single hair round me I should feel uncomfortable." I always felt inclined to say to him, " Do all that it is in thine heart to do ; " and I was happy that to me he said all that it was in his heart to say. Turner was a very different man from Constable, and yet quite like him in one respect, namely, his entire reliance on a guide within himself — always a characteristic of genius. But Constable could not help talking of his feelings, of his views of art, &c. He talked well, and this made him extremely interesting to those who could feel with him, but either tiresome or repulsive to those who could not. Turner did not talk well, and never talked of his own art, or of the art of others. To me, therefore, he was far less interesting than his pictures, but, at the same time, his prudence prevented his giving offence. It was impossible, however, not to like Turner, there was something so social and cordial in his nature. I believe him to have had an excellent heart. In the spring of 1828 Sir Walter Scott was in London, and I had the pleasure of meeting him at the house of Mr. Rogers, where were also Sir James Mackintosh, Lord John Russell, Mr. Richard Sharpe, Fennimore Cooper, Chantrey, Mrs. Siddons, Miss Fanshawe, and Miss Rogers — such an assembly as I can never hope to meet again. Daring this visit to London, Sir Walter was present at the anniversary dinner at the Royal Academy as a member, having been elected antiquary to the Academy the year before. After the usual toasts, Sir Thomas Lawrence said : " Before we part, I have to propose the health of one with whose presence we are 78 MEMOIR OF C. R. LESLIE. [chap. v. honoured, and of whom it may well be said, in the words of the poet he most resembles, — " If he had been forgotten, It had been as a gap in our great feast, And all things unbecoming." The enthusiasm with which the toast was received exceeded anything of the kind I ever witnessed, and when Scott rose to reply, the applause, for some time, prevented his speaking. As soon as he could be heard, he said : " Mr. President, — When you acquainted me with the honour the Royal Academy had done me by including me among its members, you led me to believe that the place would be a sinecure. But I now find that I then reckoned without my host, for on my first appearance here, as a member, I am called on to perform one of the most arduous of duties, that of making a speech." He then, in a few words, re- turned thanks. This was the last time I ever saw him. Of the many portraits of him Chantrey's bust is, to my mind, the most perfect. Lawrence gave him a pomposity of manner which he never assumed ; but in Chantrey's bust, the gentle turn of the head, inclined a little forwards and down, and the lurking humour in the eye and about the mouth, are Scott's own. Chan- trey watched Sir Walter in company, and invited him to break- fast previous to the sittings, and by these means caught the expression that was most characteristic. The first bust was a commission from Scott, and when breakfasting with Chantrey, he said : " You and I reverse the case supposed in Scripture, for I have asked you for a stone, and you give me bread." On the 7th January, 1830, Sir Thomas Lawrence died sud- denly. An eminent surgeon told me he believed that he was bled and physicked to death — not an uncommon occurrence in those good old times. The Royal Academy had now to choose a President, and the election took place on the 25th, when Mr. Shee had eighteen votes, Sir William Beech ey six, Wilkie two, Phillips one, and Calcott one. Allan Cunningham, in his " Life of Wilkie," has made a mistake in saying he had but one vote, that of Collins. I also voted for him, for I considered that he united more requisites for the high office than any other man in CHAP. V.] ALFRED AND JOHN CHALON. 70 the Academy. But Sir Martin Shee made so incomparable a President, that I am glad the majority did not think as Collins and I did at the time of the election. I should have mentioned that, in 1828, I joined a small society of artists that had then been established for twenty years. Its meetings are held weekly, on Friday nights, during the months of November, December, January, February, March, and April. The members assemble, at six o'clock, at each other's houses in rotation. All the materials for drawing are prepared by the host of the evening, who is, for that night, President. He gives a sub- ject, from which each makes a design. The sketching concludes at ten o'clock, then there is supper, and after that the drawings are reviewed, and remain the property of him at whose house they are made. I had been acquainted with Alfred and John Chalon for many years before joining this society, but I was now brought into a closer intimacy with them — an intimacy that I count among the best things of my life. These pleasant evenings also enabled me to appreciate the delightful social qualities of Stanfield, whose friendship from that time I have been so fortunate as to possess ; and, though indif- ferent health and the distance at which I live from most of the members, led me, in 1842, to withdraw from the society, I am still admitted to its meetings, as an honorary member, when I can attend them. CHAPTER VI. Appointment in America — Letter of Lord Egremont — Arrival in New York — Sojourn at West Point — Return to England — Samuel Rogers and Stotliard — Anecdotes of Stothard — Old Lady Cork — Newton, the Painter. In the year 1833 my brother, without consulting me (indeed there was no time), obtained for me the appointment of teacher of drawing at the Military Academy at West Point, on the Hud- son River ; and he and my sisters, as well as others of my friends in America, strongly urged me to accept it. The inducements they held out were, that it would give me a fixed income for life, that I should have the greater part of my time to myself, being obliged to attend the school only for two hours, on five days in the week ; that I should be enabled to pro- cure an excellent education for my sons at the Academy, free of expense ; that the situation was a very healthy and beautiful one, and that in America the opportunities of settling my children for life were better than in England ; that I should have a conven- ient house to live in, to which a commodious painting-room would (no doubt) be added at the expense of Government ; and that I should be once more among my relations and early friends. They represented to me that I could form no notion of the great improvements in all respects that had taken place in America since I had left it ; that at least the experiment was worth a trial ; and that if I did not like the change, I could return to England, having had an opportunity of visiting my relations at a less ex- pense of time and money than would be possible under other cir- cumstances. It was recommended to me that I should go alone, and, if I determined to remain, my wife and children should fol- low me. After a long and very harassing consideration of the matter, chap, vi.] LETTER OF LORD EGREMONT. 81 and after consulting those of my friends on whose judgment I placed the greatest reliance, I resolved to accept the situation, and my wife, great as the sacrifice was to her, determined to go with me, though her own relations, and particularly her brother, did not think very favourably of the scheme. I had not consulted Lord Egremont on this important subject, as I ought to have done. But the distance his high rank created between us made it seem to me that it would be taking too great a liberty. I might have known him better ; for after I had made up my mind and written to my brother on the subject, I received the following letter : — " Dear Sir, " It is a long time since I have had the pleasure of see- ing Mrs. Leslie and you, and as I may probably never go so far as London again, I have no chance of it unless you will come here at any time of the summer that may suit you, and I shall be very happy to receive you at any time. It seems to me that you have but one picture in your own style in the Exhibition, and the others are a scripture subject and a portrait. " Ever truly yours, &c, " Egremont." " Petworth, June 10th, 1833." In my reply to this kind letter, I acquainted Lord Egremont with my intention of visiting America, and this brought me an- other letter, which I really think, had I received it while my mind was wavering, would have kept me in England. " Dear Sir, " It is but a groundless regret at my age, when the course of nature will probably settle the point without any act of yours or mine ; but I cannot help regretting that your promised visit to Petworth will probably be the last time that I shall have the pleasure of seeing you. But I cannot disguise to myself that in the irritated state of feeling in this country,* in the midst * In the present quiet state of things (in 1844), it would be difficult for those who do not remember the excitement produced by the state of political parties 6 82 MEMOIR OF C. E. LESLIE. [CHAP. VI. of the greatest wealth and prosperity, if we had but the good sense and good temper to make the best of it, and enjoy it, even if it should subside without any fatal effects, the prospect is any- thing but encouraging ; and I believe it is the condition of hu- man nature, that almost every great improvement in society is counterbalanced by some evil arising from it, which is not thought of till it happens, and so now the great diffusion of wealth and health, and comfort and education, produces a much greater number of young persons seeking situations adapted to their cul- tivated habits and manners, than there are situations to employ them. " On the other hand, the situation to which you are going, at a considerable distance from the society of the metropolis, and with two or three hundred troublesome boys under your care, does not seem to me to be a very agreeable one." After some very kind expressions intimating his fear that I was about to leave England on account of want of employment, Lord Egremont thus concludes : " I can only say that I will gladly give a thousand pounds for a companion picture to Sancho and the Duchess. " Yours ever truly, &c, " Egremont." " Petworth, June 2