Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2014 https://archive.org/details/acGOuntofsomeeng00aylo • A N A C C O U N T OF SOME ENGWSH HISTORICAL PAINTINGS A T C O W D R Y, in S U S S E X. By Sir JOSEPH AYLOFFE, Bart. V.P.A.S. and F,R.S. L O N D O N, MDCCLXXIV. [3] AN ACCOV NT of Jome ancient English Hijlorical Paintings at C o w d r y /-^ S u s s e x. B Y Sir Jofeph Ayloffe, Bart. V. P. A. S. and F. R. S. Read at the Societv of Antiquaries, March 25, and April i, 1773. IN a Memoir which I formerly laid before the Society, touch- ing the royal pidlure of the interview between King Henry VIII. and the French King Francis the Firft [a], I took notice of the advantages which might refult to the hiftorian and antiquary from a careful infpe6lion of fuch remaining hiftoric paintings and fculptures, as, being executed with accuracy and fidelity, are go- aeval with the tranfadions they are intended to record. During the recefs of the laft fummer, in company with Meflrs. Brander, Chown, Aftle, and Bljke, Members of this Society, I had an opportunity of viewing and examining at leifure a con- fiderable number of very curious and ancient paintings of this fort, now preferved at Cowdry, near Midhurft, in SuiTex, the feat of the Right Honourable Vifcount Montague, who permit- ted us a freedom of accefs to thofe valuable treafures, with an eafe and politenefs that fully characterized the nobleman and the fcholar. The fubje(5ts of thefe paintings, together with the clrcumftan- tial and inftru6live manner in which they reprefent feveral very interefting parts of our national flory, manifeflly confirm thofe [fl] See Archaeologia, vol. III. p. 185. A 2 fenti- 4 HiJIorical Account of fcntiments which I had long entertained as to the utility of fuch pieces. And it was with no Tmall degree of fatibfadion that we foj.ip^ them not pn|y e:^hibiting exact views of towns, fortifica- tions, and other places of irnportance, in the ftate and conditioti in which they adiially were at the time of painting thofe piftures ; but that they in a great meafure explain and lay open the art of war both by fea and land, as praftifed by our anceftors above two hundred years ago, as well as reprefent the military cuftoms and manners then prevalent, exclufive of the information they afford in refpedl to a variety of other matters of antiquity. Hitherto thefe monuments of Englifh glory, although in« difputably well entitled to public attention, have remained un- defcribed, and in great meafure unnoticed. In order therefore that theSocij^ty may have fome faittt idea of them, I prefume to offer the following account, to whick I am the rather induced, by many of thofe paintings having been paffed over in filence, and others only tranfiently mentioned, by the ingenious author, whofe literary labours, and courfe of inquiries after painting in England,, enabled him to give a more drcumftantial and ample defcription of thofe valuable hiftoric records than hath hitherto been publifli^d. At prefent I fliall confine myfelf to thofe pamtings only which are the Angular and very remarkable ornaments of the great, dining parlour, referving the account of the other Englifh hifto- ric piftures, at Cowdry, to fome future occafion. These paintings, which are in oil on ftucco, occupy the whole length of each fide of the room, and are continued along the up- per end, as far as the angles of the jambs which guard the recefs formed by the great bay window. In height they reach froms the irjipoft moulding of the dado to the under fide of the cornice, and are in fine prefervatba, Those foms ancient EnglKh Paintings at Cowdry. ^ TfiosE on the left fide of the room are divided into three compartments, feparated from each other by the figure of a bair- ner-fldff, whofe biit-end is reprefented as refting on the ground, whilft its top, as low down as the coronal, is hid by the fafcia of the cornice of the room. The fir ft contains the march of Kino- Henry the Eighth from Calais towards Boulogne ; the fec« nd reprefents the encampment of the Englifli forces at Marquiile,. or, as it was then called, Marquifon ; and the third exhibits a view of the fiege of Boulogne ; an event which not only en- larged our territorial pofleffions in France, but redounded to the honour of King Henry, added glory to the Englifii arms, and fignalized the year 1 544 in our national annals. The paintings on the right hand fide of the room are divided into two compartments, the one containing the rendezvous of the Englifli army at Portfmouth, in the year 1545, to oppofe the intended invafion of this kingdom by the French, whofe for- midable fleet of men of war and tranfports are reprefented as ly- ing off"St. Helen's ; and the other containing the proceflion of King Edward the Sixth from the Tower of London to Wefl;minfter, on the day preceding that of his coronation. Before 1 proceed to a further defcrlption of thefe piflures, k perhaps n^ay be neceflary to confider for a moment the ftate of Englifli affairs about the times to which they relate. In the year 1540, the animofities which for a confiderable time had fubfifted between the Emperor Charles the Fifth and the French King Francis the Firfl:, \¥ere grown to fuch a height, as plainly indicated, that a frefli rupture between thofe two mo- narchs was nearly approaching. The latter continued to decline the performance on his part of the treaty of 1526, ufually called ^he Concord of Madrid^ and more particularly of thofe articles which related to his reftoring to Charks the duchy of Burgundy ; B and 5 j^n Hiftoncal Account of and the renunciation of his right and claim in the kingdom of Naples, and other territories in the pofleffion of Charles. On the other hand, the Emperor perfifted as obftinately in his refufal to reftore Milan to Francis. Charles thought himfelf fur- ther injured by the intrigues carried on by Francis with the Ve- netians and the Turks, the latter of whom, by his inftigation, were preparing to invade Germany ; as alfo by the endeavours that had been ufed by the Duke of Orleans, and the Dutchefs d'Eftampes, the French King's miftrefs, to take him prifoner whilft he was at Paris, in the year 1539; and by the ill fuccefs of his ne- gociations in the Diet at Worms. The aflaffination of Rincon and Fregofe, the French Ambaffadors to Venice and the Porte, whilft they were in their paffage along the Po, had likewife in- flamed the jealoufy of Francis ; who, imputing the commiffion of that a£l to orders given by the Emperor, in refentment furprlzed and kept prifoner George of Auftria. Further, the flight (hewn to his Ambafladors, at the Diet at Spire, in the following yeaf, and the contempt wherewith the remonftance there made was treated, enraged him to fuch a degree, that he publickly defied Charles, and thereupon invaded his territories in five difTerent places at once. About the fame time our King Henry the Eighth had refolved on a rupture with Scotland, for which the marriage of James the Fifth; firL, with Magdalen, the French King's daughter, agalnfl the fentiments of the King of England ; and fecondly, with Mary of Guife, to whom our King Henry had £hewn fome inclina- tion ; — James's non-compliance with an interview with Henry, which had been repeatedly appointed j his entertaining fome rebels of the North ; his refufal to do homage to Henry for the king- dom of Scotland; and fome other matters of equal impo^i'tance, were affigned as reafons. On fome ancient Englifla Piciures at Cowdry. 7 On this occafioii Henry lent Sir William Paget to Francis, with inftructions to hold him to his treaties of perpetual peace, as being apprehenfive that he was inclined to affift the Sco.ttifh King. Francis on his part declined all propofitions made by Paget ; and infifting on Henry's affiftance for the recovery of Milan, and re- fuling to pay him the penlions ftipulated by former treaties, Paget returned home. On the other hand, Henry, provoked by this condud of Francis, defifted from the treaty of marriage between the Duke of Orleans and the Princefs Mary, formerly propofed by the French Ambaffador Pomeroy, and then renewed ; and deter- mined to comply with the Emperor's folicitations, and to enter into a league with him againft France. The unexpeiled death of the Scottifli King, in 1541, put a flop to the war with Scotland ; and Henry, changing his councils, endeavoured to fecure the perfon of the young Queen of Scotland, and in due time to match her to his fon, Prince Edward ; but in this defign he was again thwarted by Francis, and the French fac- tion, which then prevailed with the Queen Regent ; fo that he haftened to conclude the league with the Emperor agalnft Francis. These were the real motives for Henry's condud at this timer but the principal caufes for a war with France, as publickly al- ledged, were the following, viz. Francis's having fortified Ardres,. and made incro3chments to the prejudice of the Engllfh ; his giving his daughter Magdalen, and afterwards the daughter of the Duke of Guife, in marriage to James, King of Scotland, con- trary to his promife ; his detaining from Henry the debt of two millions of crowns, and a yearly penlion of one hundred thou fan d crowns daring h's life, as ftipulated to be paid to him by the treaty of Moore, conchided Augufl: i, 1525; his neglefting to fupply Henry yearly with the fait of Brouage to the value of fifteen tliou- fand crowns, as fettled by one of the three treaties of the ^cth of E 2 .Aprii 8 An Hijlorkal Account of April 1 527 ; his revealing to the Emperor, when at AlgiieslMor- tes, and at Paris, divers fecrets wherewith Henry had intrufted him ; and his having confederated himfelf with theTurk. By the aforementioned league, which was ratified by Charles at IMolin del Rey, near Barcelona, on the 8th of April 1544, it was fllpulated, amongft other articles, that within one month from the declaration of war again ft France, Henry and the Emperor fliould each have a fleet at fea, bearing two, or, if need be, three thoufand foldiers, which fleet fhould remain on the coaft of France, infefting that country j that, within two years from fuch declara- tion of war, the two princes fliould, either in perfon, or by lieu- tenant, invade the kingdom of France with an army of twenty thoufand foot, and five thoufand horfe ; and that, when King Henry fliould have fo invaded France with his contingency of troops, the Emperor fliould, at his own cofts, lend him two thou- fand lanfquenets, and two thoufand able horfe, to ferve un- der him. In confequence of thefe ftipulations, Henry fent over into France an army of thirty thoufand men, divided into three battails. The van was led by Thomas Duke of Norfolk, and the rear by the Lord Ruflel, affifted by Henry Earl of Surry, marflial of the field. Thefe forces landing at Calais, marched direftly to Mont- reuil, where being joined by ten thoufand of the Emperor's troops, under the command of the admiral Count de Bures, they laid fiege to that town. At the fame time the main battail, conduc- ted by Charles Duke of Suffolk, the King's lieutenant, accompa- nied by Henry Fitz Alan, Earl of Arundel, Marflial of the field, Sir Anthony Brown, Mafler of the King's horfe, and divers others, likewife landed at Calais, and encamping near that place, waited for the King's arrival. On the 14th of July Henry, attended by a royal train, landed at Calais, and took up his refidence there, at fome ancient Englifli Paintings at Cowdry. 9 at the houfe appropriated for the ufe of his Exchequer. Hereon the next day he was waited on by Don Bertran de la Cueva, Duke Albuquerque, commander of the Emperor's auxiliary forces, as alfo by the Count de Bures, admiral of the Low Countries. Thefe officers having informed Henry of the ftate of their mailer's forces and affairs, the King on that day ordered the Duke of Suf- folk, who with the troops under his command then lay encamped at Marquifon, or Marquife, to march diredlly, and inveft Bou- logne, whilft the other part of the army carried on the fiege of Montreuil. On Friday the i8th of July the Duke reconnoitred the out- works of Boulogne, and on the next day broke up his camp, and fat down before the lower town, which was taken on the Monday following, notwithftanding a vigorous fally made by the garrifon of the high town. Henry, having received the news of this fuccefs of his arms, difmiiled the Emperor's admiral, who had till then attended him ; and on the 25th of July marched out of Calais, and encamping that night at Marquifon, he, on the next day, proceeded to join the army before Boulogne. With thefe circumftances the paintings on the left hand fide of the room commence. On a fcroll near the top of the firft compartments of the paint- ings is written, " The Metinge of the Kinge bst *< St Antoni Browne upon the «' Hill betwene Callis and " Marquison." On the right hand is a bird's-eye view of the RifebanCy or, more properly fpeaking, the Ryjhrook, together with the town and caftle of Calais, and their refpeftive fortifications. At fome din:ance from them, and nearly at the bottom of the fore-ground of the picture, is an elevation of the weft-front of fort Nieulai, or 2 as lo An Hijlorkal Account of as it was then called by the Englifh Newman's Bridge^ but by miftake written New Name Bridg on the pidure. King Henry, with a moft royal train which marched with him from Calais, is here reprefented as paffing through fort Nieulai^ and from thence croffing the river of Hames^ by means of a bridge compofed of three arches, and proceeding towards Marquifon, or Marquife. The King, drefTed in compleat armour, and mounted on a bay horfe richly caparifoned, rides in the midfl: of a body of pikemen, and is preceded by his ftandard-bearer, carrying the royal banner. Some perfons, apparently of quality, on horfeback, fundry officers at arms, and a party of foldiers, are reprefented as having juft af- cended the hill between Efcales and Peuplinque, where the King is received by Sir Anthony Brown at the head of a party of horfe. The horfemen in compleat armour, and under the guidon of St, George are drawn up on the fummit of the hill on the left hand, Oppofite to them the trumpeters of the guard, richly drefled in the royal livery, form a line, each of them having his trumpet ornamented with a banner of the arms of England and France quarterly. They feem as if founding to arms on the King's ap- proach. In the middle of the ground, between the horfemen and trumpeters, is Sir Anthony Brown, mounted on a brown horfe, and bowing in the moft refpeflful manner to the King. He holds, his bonnet in his right hand, and points with it towards the right of the forces, probably to fhevv the King the ground which had been marked out near Marquife for the royal camp, though the fpot is not reprefented in the pi£lure. In the rear of the King is a party of horfe, followed by feveral bodies, as well of horfe as foot, dreffed in diftinft liveries, having their refpeftive banners and guidons difplayed. Thefe form a ilne of march from the gate of Nieulai to the bridge over the river of Hames^ and continue from thence Co the place where the King is met by Sir Ajithony Brown. Although fome ancient EngUfh Paintings at Cowdry. i r Although the fubjeft of this piece unavoidably occafioned a fltiffnefs in the painting, yet the painter hath relieved it as much as he poffibly could confiftently with the truth of hiftorical repre- fentation, by a laudable difpofition of the feveral bands of men, by the face given to the country through which they are paffing, and by the introdudion and difpofition of feveral figures repre- fented as ftragglers from the main body of the army. As he feems to have been chafte in properly difiinguiftiing the different corps of guards, henchmen, light horfe, demi-lances, pikemen, gun- ners, &c. fo he hath duly obferved to mark the different live- ries of the refpeilive bands, by varying the cloathing of each ftragler, and by reprefenting fome as wearing both ftockings of the fame colour, and others with one flocking of one colour, and the other of another colour ; thus fome have both ftockings white, fome both red, and fome both yellow, vvhilft others again have a yellow flocking on one leg, and a red flocking on the other. Some have a white flocking on the left leg, and a red one on the right; and others again a yellow flockiug on the right legj and a black flocking on the left. At a confiderable diftance from the line of march, but clofe to the north wefl tower of fort Nieulaiy and in the front of the piece, are two foldiers reprefented as fighting with each other. 7"he ikuli-cap or head- piece of each is fimilar; but they are differently arirfcd, the one holds a fmall buckler in his left hand, and a long fword in his right ; and the other hath a very large buckler, and a fword fomewhat fhorter than that of his antagoniil. It is difficult to determine the reafbn for introducing the figures of theie combatants into the pi6lure ; but as they are placed in the fore-ground, aivd in a very confplcuous manner, there can remain but little doubt of their being defigned to mark and perpetuate the iViemory of fome fingular event which happened at that tirhe. Having taken a view of this firfl compartment, it is no mroe than juflice to confider how the painter hath therein kept to, ot deviated from, hiflorical truth. In the Diary of the King's voyage, it An W[loncal Account cf voyage, and of the fiege of Boulogne, printed by Rymer [b], we find, that the Duke ot Suffolk, with Sir Anthony Brown, Mafter of the Horfe to the King, 2nd the main battail of the Englifh forces, lay encamped at Marquifon, which is about nine miles from Boulogne : That five days after the King's arrival at Calais, they undertook the fiege ot Boulogne, and that the King, having received the news of the taking the lower town on the 25th of July, marched for Boulogne in the following order. Firft, drums and viffleurs; then the trumpets, the officers of arms, and the barons ; — then Garter, followed by the Duke of Alberquerk, and the Earl of Rutland bearing the King's banner difplayed ; then the King's Majefty, armed at all pieces, mounted upon a goodly courfer. And after him the Lord Herbert, bearing the King's head-piece and fpear ; and followed by the henchmen, well horfed. That at the gates of Nieulai the King was met by the Duke of Alberquerk's company of one hundred horfe, the Earl of Eflex chief captain of the men at arms, and Sir Thomas Drury, accom- panied by a great number of horfemen j and that he proceeded from thence in the following order. Firft, light horfes and demi- lances J then the guard, viz. twentyfive archers on the right fide, and as many gunners on the left ; the King's Majefty riding in the midft of the pikemen ; then the men of arms ; after whom the reft of the army followed, every band in order, having liis banner or guidon difplayed. Lord Herbert, in his Life of Henry the Eighth, further fays, ** that the main battail were apparelled in a bizarre fafliion, their " colours being red and yellow, and that the van-guard had caps and hofe party coloured." And HoUinflied, in his Chronicle, takes notice, " that the battel, called the King's battel, were in i< coats, caps, and hofen, red guarded with yellow.'* Now if we Rymer's Foed. vol. XV, compare fome ancle Hi Englifli Paintings at Cowdry. 13 comp.ire thefc accoiints with the pldure, we fiiall find that the pahiter hath adhered to facls and the truth of hirtory in every par- ticular, fo far at leaft, as it was poffible for him to rcprefent them in his piece. As none of the Engllfli hlftorians, or the Diary juft now quo- ted, exprefsly mention that it was Sir Anthony Brown wlio re- ceived the King on the height between Efcales and Peuplinque, fome doubts may perhaps be ftarted as to the truth of the above affertion. Probability will however in great meafure fupport it. Sir Anthony Brown, as appears by the before-mentioned journal, was at that time encamped at Marquifon ; and being mafter of the horfe to the King, had, in point of office, the care of the quarters there affigned for that monarch ; confequently he was the moil proper perfon to meet the King, and to (hew and condudl him to his camp. This fuggeftion is further ftrengthened, not only by the tradition that hath always prevailed in Lord Montague's fa- mily, that Sir Anthony met the King on that fpot^ and the in- fcription on the pifture teftifying the fame j but by the evident likenefs that there is between the face of the figure reprefented as meeting the King, and that of an undoubted portrait of Sir An- thony, now in one of the apartments at Cowdry. The Rijbank, or Ryjbrook [c], is here depifted in the fame form and manner as it is reprefented in a plan of the fiege of Ca- lais, [^r] The Rifoarik, corruptly fo called from its more ancient name of Ryforook^ is fuppofed by fevcral.of the French writers (1) to have been the work of the Emperor Caligula, but in fail it was originally built by the Englifli, fo late as the reign of King Richaid II. as is evident from the French Rolls now preferved in the Tower of London. In the year 1391, the French having augmented the fortifications of Ardres, St. Omers, and Boulogne, and placed ftrong garrifons in (i) Etat ds la France par M. Boulainviiliers, torn. I. p. 64. Memorial of Monf. Bignon, Intendant of Picardy, MS, in the Depot at Verfailles. Aniales de Calais, par M. BarnarJ, chap. iv. p. 28, C each. 14 -^n Hi/lor ical Account of lais, by the Duke de Gulfe, in the year 1558, puMiflicd by Monf. Lefcbure, in his Millory of Calais [c/J. Exaflly confon^nt to the lame plni is the view of the town and fortifications of Calais, and that cf fort NisuLii, or Newman's Bridge [f"*, a^ clelcrib:'d in this painting. It is farther obfervable, for the trcdit and authenticity of the Cowdry pifture, that the painter hath given the fame pre- cife niniiber and form of arches tohisbri Jcreover the river of Hames, as it appears to have in that engraved in the before-mentioned plan ot the liege. The fecond compartment reprefents, as is expreffed near its top, *' The Camping of the King at Morguison." each, thereby alarmed the Englifli, who be^an to fufpeiH: fom.e defign was form- ing againft Calais. John Duke of Lancafter was thereupon appointed lieutenant general of the Englifh territories in Ficardy, and fent to infpeft and examine into the condition of the fortrefTes in thofe parts (2). On his arrival at Calais, he gave orders for putting the fortifications of that place into a proper ftate of de- fence, and finding it weak on that fide next to the harbour, he there erefted a ftrong fortified tower, which obtained the appellation, fiift of The New Tower^ and afterwards that of Lancajlers New Tower (3). After the battle of Agincourt, John GerrardjWho was then commandant of this tower, by order of King Henry V. added thereto two ftrong baftions, feparated by a curtain of one hundred and thirty-two feet in length, which ferved as a wall for the cafements, which were carried on throughout its whole extent, and fortified with turrets at each angle {4). From that time it v/as called the Fortrefs of Ryfirook. Some of thofc works are now remaining, [ij Tom. II. p. 292. [f] The origin of fort Nieiilai is not exaflly known ; but it is generally fup- pofed to be one of thofe forts which were built by the Emperor Charlemagne, in the year 810, upon the fea coaft ofPicardy, to defend it againft: the invafions of the Danes, and other Northern pirates, who then infefted the feas between Flan- ders, France, and England. Malbr. de Morin. lib. v. c. 46. Hift. de la Ville de Calais, per M. L^febure, torn. I. p. 628, 629. (2) Rot. Franc, m. 5. (3) Ibid, m, I. & g. Hift. de Calais, par M, Lefebure, torn, I. p. 133. ^4) Rot. Franc, m. 9. Sc 17. Hift. de Calais, par M. Lefebure, torn. II, p. 100. The fomc ancknt Englirii Paintings at Cowdry. i ^ The front or foreground of this piece reprefents a champaign country, covered with baggage and ammunition Vva_'gons, artil- lery, and a great number of dilTerent forts of tents, labouring un- der the utmoft diftrefs fi-om a violent and incefTant ficnm of wind and lightning, which is exprefled in a mafterly manner. Here we fee feveral tents blown down, and lying on the ground; whilft the foldiers and women, in ail the pangs of fright and horror, are endeavouring to creep fiom under the fliattered ruins, and feem apprehenlive of being again buried under the neighbouring tottering tents. Others have ihcir tent-pins drawn, and are re- prefented as falling, whilft the foldiers and artillery- men, harraffed by the ftrefs of weather, and fcarce able to ftand againft the force of the wind, weakly endeavour to keep them up. Of thofc that are left ftanding, fome are torn in pieces by the wind, and others have their curtains blown open, and waving in the air. In the back ground is a view of the church and village of Marquifon all on fire, occafioned, as tradition ha:h it, by the flafhes of light- ning. The hiftorians of that time take no notice of this ftorm; but the above quoted Diary alludes to it, where it fays, " The " King camped that night at Marquifon, being a very great tem- " peftuous night of rain and thunder." The third compartment, which is in fize equal to both the former, reprefents the liege of Boulogne \J\ On [/] Theancitnt Gejfor'iacum changed its name for that of Bononla, under the empire of Dioclefian, about which time Caraufius, finding that town a proper retreat for his troops then employed in an expedition againft the Morini, took pofteflion of the place, and fortified it ; but not long after he was difpoffefled thereof by Conftantius Chlorus, who thenceforth kept his court there, whenever his af- fairs did not call him to Treves. From the frequent refidence of the fubfequent emperors at this place, and more particularly when the harbours of Wiflan and Ambletufe were abandoned, Boulogne became a flourifhing town, being then the C 2 only 1 6 An HiJIorical Account of On the left hand is a view of the high or upper town of Boulogne, defended by a fliong wall, flrengtheued with lofry rauiparts, cnl,' port in Gaul at which the Romans enlxi'kcd for Britaip, and was th n cal- led Bononia Oceanenfij^ to dirtinguifh it from Bononia in Italy. In the year 463 it appears to be generally called Boulogne; for in that year, Leger, the principal of the chiefs of the iVlorini, on the fubmillion of thofe people to the Franks, was ap- pointed Earl of Boulogne, and its territories, which extended to the river Efca it; but he going foon afier into Britain to the alTiftance of Uther Pendragon, vvas deprived of thofe his then new dignity and acquifitions. His fon Leger II. how- ever, by the aid of our Britifh King Arthur, recovered them from Clotaire, King of Soiflbns, to whofe lot they had fallen upon the partition made between him and his three brothers, after the death of their father Clovis. In 8S1, the north- ern intruders, who had ravaged Flanders and the fea coafl of Picardy, laid fiege to Boulogne, and having entirely rafed its ancient walls, wh'ch from their excef- five height had occafioned the town to be foinetimes called Haut-mur^ or Haulte- mure (1), malTacred great part of the inhabitants, without diflincElion of age or fex. From that time Boulogne was in great meafure deferted, till Philip, Earl of Boulogne, uncle to King Lewis IX. in the year 1227, re-edified its walls, divided the upper from the lower town, and ftrengthened the former, by erecting on its eaft fide a caftle, defended by a wet ditch, which feparated it from the town, wherewith it had communication by means of a bridge; as alfo by raifing at a fmall diftance a ftrong tower, called Parquet, or Martinienne (2). From thefe advantages the inhabitants formed the mofl: fanguine hopes of feeing their town flourifti once more ; but they were greatly difappointed in their expectations, by Philip's fortifying of Calais, cleanfing and. deepening its harbour, erecting a ftrong caftle for its defence, making it the place of his refidence, and giving every encouragement to the eftabliftiment of trade and commerce therein ; of all which advantages the inhabitants made the beft ufe. The taking of Calais by theEng- lifti, in the year 1347, gave a new turn to the aftairs of Boulogne, as from that time it became the frontier town of the French territories, and the only fortrtfs that could cover Picardy on that fide next Calais. On this account Charles VI. enlarged and ftrengthened its fortifications confiderably ; and the town, by reafon of the numerous garrifon ufually kept there, and the conveniency of its harbour, foon grew rich and flourifliing, notwithftanding the frequent incurfions mace in o its neighbourhood by the Englifli garrifon at Calais. In the year 1488 K.Henry VII. with a powerful army befieged it; but foon after raifed the fiege, on the exchanging (i) Coutumier general dePicardie, par Duhours. (?) Mem. de Pu Bellai. Arn, Ferron. ad Hift. P. JEmil. addit. p. 14?. the feme ancient Englifli Paintings ai Covclry. 17 r.imparts, and baftions fixed on its flar.k?. On the eaft fide of t};e town \i the citadel, covered by another large baftion. Beneath thofe, and nearer to the fore part of the piclure, is a view of tlie lower town, as alfo of its river a;ul harbour, with part of the fea between the jettee heads and the harbour of Wiflan. In the fore- ground of the piclure is the main Englifli camp within an intrtnch- mer.t thrown up on the north fide of Boulogne, from whence the approaches appear to be carried on for forming the attack upon that part of the high tov/n which faces towards the fea. Over it is written " The King's Camp." At the eaftern corner of this camp is a royal battery, confifiing of upwards of thirty guns, commanded by the King in perfon \g\ He is drefled in compleat - armour the ratificrtion of the peace concluded between him and Charles VIII. which the latt r pui chafed at the price of feven hundred and forty thoufar.d crowns. Francis I. foon after his acceffion, increafed the fortifications, by adding thereto the tower of our Lady, that of St. Francis, and a tliird called le Moineau, which latter commanded the lov/ town, was flrengthened with ramparts faced with freeflone, and flanked at due diftances with turrets mined and countermined. In 1532 it was honoured with being the place of interview between King Henry Vill and Francis I. when they entered into that agreement which obliged the Grand Sig- nior to lay afide his dcfign of invading Chriftendom (3). In 1544 it was be- fieged and taken by King Henry VIII, and continued in the pollcffion of the Englifli till the month of January 1550, when, in confideration of four hundred thoufand crowns, agreed to be paid by the French King Henry II. to King Ed- ward VI. it was, purfuant to treaty, delivered up to the French. [^] I'he face of the King, as reprefented in this part of the painting, is far from being a good likenefs, and is painted in a ftyle inferior to that of any other portrait in the room. This circumftance is the more necelTary to be taken notice of, as it will be obferved in the fequel, that our painter was peculiarly attentive to the giving an exacS: portrait of the King, and fucceeded happily in that attempt. The cafe was this. During the grand rebellion, Cowdry being made a place of arms for the Parliament forces, the then noble owner caufed all the paintings in the (3) Corps Diplom. T. IV. part. IV. p. 8g. Du Tillet, v. iv. Rrcueil des Tiiitet , higher up in the pldlnre, is the park for the artil- lery, crowded with ordnance iiorc^, artillery waggons, great gnns, mortars, f.sfcin-.s, f. nd bags, and the feveral inrpkments belonging to the train. A great niimb.r of foldiers and njatrofles are here, biifily employed in making up and delivering out cartridges for the great gi;ns, charging bomb fhells, twilling match, and per-, forming a variety of other fcrviccs. In the front of this park^ is a battery playing upon a bafticn built at that angle of the town wall which is near to the breach made by the great guns oi the royal battery. Between thefe two camps is another battery, con- filiing of mortars only, all of which are throwing bombs irito the. town. More within the land, and to the right of the road lead- ing from Boulogne to Marqulfe, is another camp, called The Lord Admiral's Camp. In the front of this camp is a fafcine battery, which plays furioufly on the caftle, and over it is written The Monte. This battery is particularly mentioned by Hol- linflied, who fays, that, " befides the trenches which were caft *' and brought in manner round about the town, there was a *' mount raifed on the eaft fide, and divers pieces of artillery planted aloft thereon, which, together with the mortar pieces, fore an- " noyed them \vithin, and battered down the Heeple of our Lady's *' church;" and then adds, '* the battery was made in the trioft " forcible wife in three feveral places, and the walls, tower, and " caftles, were undermined, and the town within fo beaten with <* fhot out of the camp, and from the mount and trench by the mortar " pieces, that there were but few houfes left therein." Our pic- \h'\ During the ti:ne of the aflault, the great artillery did beat flill upon them ^ that prefented themfelves at the breaches to repel ihe alLilants. Hol'inflicd's Chron. ture 20 An Hiflorical Account of ture reprefents the cathedral, tower, caftle, and town, exactly in Tuch a ruinous condition. On tljc left of the laft-mentloned canip is another fafcine battery playing upon the citadel, defended by a large tower or baftion [?], near to which a confiderable breach appears to be made In the wall \Ji\, On this battery is dlfplayed a large flag charged with the Crols of St. George, Impaled with B-irre of eight, Azure and Or. More to the left of thefe is yet another camp, over which is written The Duke of Sufoly's Campe. Within the lines af this camp are two batteries of five guns each: one is playing furioufly on the bray of the citadel, which appears to be almoil reduced to ruins ; and the other is battering in breach in that part of the town wall which di- vides the land port from the citadel. At a confiderable dlfl:ance from thefe camps, and in the upper part of the pi£lure, where there is a faint appearance of tents, is written Sir Anthony Brown's Camp. From this camp Sir Anthony Brov^n, mounted on a bay horfe, and attended by feveral other horfemen, is feen riding full fpeed towards the road to Montreuil, and waving in his right hand the King's ftandard, charged in chief with the Dragon of Cadwaliader, and near to the extremities of each point, with the Crofs of St. George [/^ Betv/een the Duke of Alberquerque's camp and that of the Lord Admiral, is a bag-piper playing on his drone, and followed [/] And. Ferron, in his additions to the Hiftory of P. T^lmilius, p. 148, fays, that this tower was called Parquet^ or Mart'nientie, [/f] When a piece of the caftle was blown up, and the breaches made as was thought reafonable, the aflault was given by the Lord Dudley. Hollinflied's Chronicle. [/I Lcfebure and other French writers fay, that the armies of Henry and Francis amounted together to 8o,oco foot, and 2o,COO horfe, and that each of them had a much greater train of artilKry and warlike ftores than had ever before been feen in Europe, by fome ancient Engllfh Paintings at Cowdry. 21 by a number of men, drefled in plaids, their hair red, their heads uncovered, and their legs bare. They have pikes in their hands, and broad fwords hanging by their fides, and are driving flieep and oxen towards the artillery park. Thefe probably were intended to reprefent certain Scotch irregulars in their return from foraging for the fnpply of the Englifli army. At the bottom of the fore-ground of the pidure, and to the right of the King's camp, is a view of an o£langular pharos or watch-tower, fortified by a ditch, and fome out- works, and fitu- ate on the top of the promontory, or cliffs which command the entrance into the harbour. On its front is written The Old Man [/■], and within the works are feen feveral Engiifh foldiers. When [z] The building of this tower, called by the French Tour d'Ordre, and by the Englifh The Old Man, is by father Montfaucon and others [i] afcribed to the Emperor Caligula, at the time of his vaunted, although only pretended, con- queft of Britain, and as intended by him for a monument of that vain-glorious ex- pedition. The difcovery made in the year 1681 of the remains of a fimilar build- ing, together with divers Roman infcriptions, coins, and other antiquities, near the old mouth of the Rhine, hath however induced other writers to fix upon Catwick^ in the neighbourhood of Leyden, as the true fcite of Caligula's Pharos, and to at- tribute the building of the Tour d' Ordre to fome other of the Emperors (2) ; all the wi iters on this fubjeit agreeing, that it was undoubtedly a work of the Romans. Upon the decline of the empire, this pharos fell to decay, and continued in a ruinous condition till the year 810, when Charlemagne having pitched upon Boulogne as the place of rendezvous for the fleet which he had fitted out to oppofe the invafion of his dominions by the Danifti and other piratical Northern ftates, caufed it to be repaired, fortified, and lighted up for the better direction and fafetjr of his cruizers on that coaft (3). If we may credit fome of the French hiftori- ans, that Emperor entertained fo high an opinion of the utility of this pharos, that in token thereof he created one of the fons of Otton, Earl of Boulogne, a Baron, by the ftile of Baron d'Ordre (4). This matter however is very much contro- (1) Memoiresde 1' Academic des Infcriptiions, torn. vi. p. 581. (1) Adrian Junius, in Hift. Batav. p. 108. Ortelii Theat. Mundi, p. 47. Delices de Leyde, par Gerard Goris, p. 20. Lefebure, Hift. de Calais, vol. I. p. 137, &c. (^) "Eginhardi Vita Car. Mag. ap. Du Chefne, T. ii. p. 200, 201. (4) Chopin de Legibus Andium, p. 378. verted, D 22 An Htflorlcal Account of When the Englifh fat down before the town, this pharos contained vferted (5). When the Danifti pirates laid fiege to Boulogne, in the year 88 1, the Tour d" Ordre^ by means of the crofs-bow men ported in it, was of great fer- vice to the town, by galling the enemy's flank, and impeding their approaches, till, the wall being broke down in many places, it was taken by ftorm. From the de- parture of the Danes, this tower continued the only defence of the harbour and town till the year 1227, when Philip Earl of Boulogne, uncle to Lewis IX, di- vided the upper from the lower town, and re-edified the ancient walls of the former, which had in great meafure been demoliflied during the before-mentioned liege (6). King Henry VIII, after he had taken Boulogne, encompaffed this pharos with a fmall fort, turreted at each angle, and ftrengthened it with other out-works, fo that the ancient tower looked like the dungeon or keep of the fort- refs (7). It remained in this ftate till the year 1644, when the people of Boulogne having opened a quarry between the fort and the harbour, and drawn from thence a large quantity of ftone, which they fold to the Dutch, the fea broke in, and, waftiing away large pieces of the rock, undermined the foundation fo far, that about noon of the 29th day of July, the top part of the clifF, together with the fort and pharos, fell down at the fame inftant (8). Of this oflagonal tower father Montfaucon gives the following defcription, which is here inferted as a teftimony of the accuracy of the painter of the Cowdry pi£lures. "According to Bucheiius, <' each fide of this building was at its bafe twenty-four or twenty-five inches broad ; *' the circumference of the whole being about two hundred feet, and its di- •* menfion fixty-fix. Its elevation confifted of twelve ftages or ftories, each of which *• gradually diminilhed, and was at its bafe lefsin diameter than that immediately *' beneath it. This reduction was efFeded by decreafingthe thicknefs of the wall of " the reduced ftory, and revealing or fetting itback within the thicknefs of that of *' its under ftory, fo that the projeflile part of the latter, by its greater thicknefs, *' formed on its top a kind of gallery of about eighteen inches wide, running round " the outfide of the tower. And in this manner the building was carried up to its *• fummit, whereon the fires were lighted. In order to give this tower an agreeable " appearance, the walls were built of different-coloured materials. Firft, three cour- *' fes of iron coloured freeftone,thcn twocourfes of ayellowifli ftone, and over them " two courfes of found red bricks ; and this variation of colour and materials wais regularly obferved in carrying up the walls as far as to theunderfide of the coping". The original appellation of this tower was Turris Ardens, which afterwards was corrupted to Turris Ordans, or Ordensis ; and at length varied by the Boulonois, to LA Tour p'Ordre (9). (5) Lefebure, Hift. de Calais, vol, i, p. 429. (6) Le Er. Le Q^itn,Hift. de la Ville de Boulogne, M. S. Infcnption over the caflle-gate at Boulogne. (7) Mem. tie I'Acad, des Infcrip. Tom. vi. p. 589. (8) Ibid. (9) Ibid. a nunie° fome ancient EngllHi Paintings at Covvdrj. 2j a numerous garrifon, well provided with all forts of ncceflarics fufficient to hold out a long time j but on the third day of the fiege, its commandant, together with the garrifon, furrendered themfelves prifoners of war to the Duke of Suifolk. In this piece, perhaps the moft perfeft and diftinft of any of its kind, we have the compleat reprefentalion of a fiege, according to the pra£lice ufed above two hundred years ago. We fee the form of thofe fortifications which were then fuppofed to be fufficient forthe defence of a frontier town. We alfo fee that town invefted by a powerful army divided into four camps, with the Park of Artillery in the midft, and the fiege covered by a body of forces, encamped at diftance. Here we are taught the form and manner of encamp- ments, the method of carrying on approaches, and forming the attack, together with the mode of defence. We fee the forms of great ordnance, mortars, and military machines, then ufed, with the method prafiifed in working them ; the various implements of war, ordnance ftores, falcines, camp colours, enfigns, banners, guidons, and tents ; as alfo the bread, baggage, and ammunition waggons, then in fervice ; of which lafl: fome are of a very lin- gular fhape, being half cones laid on their fide upon the bed of their carriages, and with their broadeft end next to the (hafts. Here likewife we learn the methods ufed in preparing and fupply- ing the train and army with all ftores, &c. wanted in their differ- ent departments. We are fhewn the various uniforms or liveries of the refpedive bands of foldiers, and the habiliments of war appropriated to the different corps. In fhort, by duly contem- plating the pidure, we may form a tolerably good idea of what- ever related to the military of thofe times. In order to afcertain the precife time of the fiege which the painter made choice of for the minute of the piece, we muft recur to iifliory. D 2 The i24 Hijlor'ical Account of The trenches [^] were begun, and the firfl: battery was opened and eredted againll: Boulogne upon the 19th of July. On the 2 ill the lower town was taken. On the 22d the Tour d' Ordre, called by the Englifli the Old Man, the figure of which is re- prefented in the fore ground of this pidture, and which defended the entrance into the port, together with its garrifon, furrendered at difcretion to our troops. King Henry did not come to the camp before the town till the 26th of that month, and it was not until the 3d of Auguft that the batteries to the eaft of the town where the King lay began their fire. On the 8th of September, as we learn from the King's letter to the Queen, the bray of the caftle was taken, and three other batteries began to play on the caftle and town, which, with the three mines that day fprung, did great execution in tearing the largeft: of the bulwarks. In the pi6ture the town and caftle, with their refpeftlve forti- fications, are reprefented as in a ruinous condition. A large breach is made in the wall fronting towards the north, and the men in the trenches before it are aftive and bufy, as preparing for the afl^ault, under cover of the royal battery, which is playing furioufly on that part of the town which adjoined to the breach. The bray appears to be reduced almoft to ruins, a breach is made in the wall near the citadel, and great part of the citadel itfelf broke down, and the cannon and mortars from all the other batteries are playing on thofe fortifications. These circumftances, as reprefented in the painting, being therefore compared with the hiftory of the progrels of the fiege, as it flood on the 8th of September, according to the diary, and the King's letter to the Queen, may be an inducement to fix on that day for the time of the pifture now under confideration [/]. [/^] Journal of the fiege in Rymer's Foedera, before cited, f/j Hollinftied fays, that the town furrendered on the 8th day of September j but the journal fays, that it was on Holyrood day, the 14th of September. During /J fome ancient Engllfii Painti?igs at Cowdry. 25 During the fiege, the Duke de Vendome was hovenng about Picardy, with an army of obfervation, and harrafled the befieg- ers ; the Dauphin alfo, with a confiderable number of forces, frequently attempted to relieve Boulogne, and compel King Henry to raife the fiege. It is therefore probable, that the hurry in which the painting reprefents Sir Anthony Brown, when coming from his camp, was owing to an alarm of that fort, and that his bring- ing out the royal ftandard in the manner defcribed, was to ferve a double purpofe, viz. that of fummoning to arms the men in the camp under his particular command, and that of giving notice at the fame time to King Henry of the enemy's approach. The firft compartment on the right hand fide of the room re- prefents a very memorable tranfaftion, to wit, that of the at- tempt made by the French to invade this kingdom in the year 1545, which Monfieur Rapin juftly calls the greateft attempt the French had ever made at fea ; together with the preparations at Portfmouth, and on the adjacent coaft, to oppofe and prevent the execution of that formidable defign. In the autumn of the year 1544, the French King, finding his affairs bear a very unfavourable afped, and that his towns of Boulogne and Montreuil were on the point of furrendering to the Englifli troops which then befieged them, haftened to con- clude a feparate treaty with the Emperor, being inceiTantly urged thereto by the Duchefs d* Efiampes, who at that time laboured to obtain for the Duke of Orleans an efiablifliment out of the kingdom of France, whereto fiie might retire, in cafe either of her difgrace, or the King's death. This treaty was accordingly figned at Crefley, in the Laonnois, on the i8th of September, four days after the furrender of Boulogne, by which means King [^«J Memoires de Du Bellai, liv. 10,. Henry 26 An HtJlGrical Account of Henry VIII, dcfeited by the Emperor, was left alone to fccure his new conqiieft;, and carry on the war agahift France. This treaty furniflied Francis the Fiift with a favourable opportunity for endeavouring to vvrei?k his revenge on Henry, on account of his having taken Boulogne, and the ravages committed on the French coafts by the Englifli fleet. He accordingly determined to invade England, and for that purpofe [??] affembled his whole fleet, confiiling of one hundred and filty large (hips, bcfides twenty- five gallies, and fifty fmall vcffels and tranfports, at Havre de Grace, under the command of Monfieur d' Annebaut, ad- miral of France. This formidable fquadron, after having been reviewed by the French King and his whole court with the greateft parade, took a confiderable number of troops on board, and fet fail for England on the fixth day of July, and on that evening came to an anchor off the point of St. Helen's, in the Ifle of Wight. King Henry, who had previoufly received un- doubted information of the defign of this great armament, ordered the Englifli forces, under the command of his lieutenant general the Duke of Suffolk, to rendezvous at Portfmouth ; near to which, at Spithead, his navy, commanded by the Vifcount Lifle, high ad- miral of England, then lay. He likewife foon after repaired to Portfmouth, and there joined the army. At day-break on the 19th, the French admiral being determined to provoke the Eng- lifli fleet to an engagement, fent in fome of the gallies, with or- ders to fire upon our (hips, whilft they were at anchor under fhel- ter of the forts. Thefe orders were accordingly executed by Paulin, Baron de la Garde, who had the condudt of the gallies, and it is the circumftances under which the French and Englifli fleets were at that particular time, that are the principal fubjed of the painting now to be defcribed* £»j Memoires de M. du Belki. This fome ancient Englifli Paintings at Cowdry, 27 This pldure gives us a view of the harbour, town, and forti- fications of Portfmouth, of Soutbfea Caftle, Spithead, the Ifle of Wight, and part of the adjacent county of Hants, as alfo of the French andEnglifli fleets, and of part of the Englifli camp. The entrance or gate of the town of Portfmouth on the land fide is placed fo as to face the fpeftator, and the other three fides appear to be encompafled with a fingle wall, kernekd at the top, and fortified at the angles by circular forts or baftions, probably thofe which, as the great luminary of antiquity, Mr. Camden [0], tells us, were begun by King Edward the Fourth, and finifhed by King Henry the Seventh. On the rampart next to the harbour is a flag flying, charged with Barre of four, Or, and Argertt. At a fmall diftance from the town, and near to the point, is the Englifh camp, defended on that part of its front which faces towards St. Helen's, by a circular fort, mounted with four guns. All the tents and pavilions are paned, fome blue and white, fome red and white, and others red and yellow; and the principal of them furmounted by vanes charged with the arms of the refpedlive commanders to vv'hom they feverally appertained. The King, mounted on a ftately courfer, whofe headftall, reins, and fi:irrups, are ftudded and embofied with gold, is reprefented as riding from the town of Portfmouth, and jufi: entering into Southfea Caftle, in his way to the camp. He wears on his head a black bonnet, ornamented with a white fea- ther, and is dreffed in a jacquet of cloth of gold, and a furcoat or gown of brown velvet, with breeches and hofe of white filk. His countenance appears ferene and fedate. All the features of his face are highly finillied, and the portrait hath by good judges been efteemed to be the greateft likenefs we now have of that monarch. On his right hand are three henchmen or pages on foot, dreffed in [o] Brit, in Hampfliire. the 28 An Hijlorical Account of the royal uniform, and bearing their bonnets in their hands; and on his left handv.re two lacqneys likewife on foot, drefled in differ- ent liveries. Behind the King are two perfons on horfeback ; that on the right hand is the Duke of Suffolk, the King's lieutenant in this expedition, mounted on a black horfe ; he is drcff d in a fcar- let habit, and hath a black bonnet on his head : his beard is re- markably white, curled, and parted in the middle. The other is Sir Anthcuy Brown, the King's mnfter of the horfe, mounted on a white courfer. Thefe are followed by two demi-lancemen, horfed, and complcatly harneficd. Bp: T WREN the camp and the fort on the point, is a large band of pikemen in armour ; having with them two pair of colours difplayed, the one charged with Barre of feven, Argent and Gules, and the other with the crofs of St. George. Clofe to their left flank is a numerous band of gunners. Both of thefe corps feem to be marching from the main guard to the platform fronting the fea. This platform is interfperfed with feveral perfons, fome of whom appear to be foldiers, and others merely fpeftators. On the back of the Ifle of Wight, off Bembridge Point, and thence ftretching along fliore to St. Helen's Road, is the numerous French fleet, all under their top-fails. Off that part which is known by the name of No Maris hand, are feveral French gal- lies ; and ftill further inward are four more of the French gallies firing at the Englifli fleet, which is lying at Spithead. The four lafl: mentioned gallies are undoubtedly placed here, to reprefent and point out the pofition of thofe, which, as we are informed by du Bellai and Florenge, the French admiral had detached from his fleet, under the conduft of the Baron de la Garde, to provoke the Englifli fleet, and bring on a general engagement. Be- hind the Englifli fquadron, on the fliore on the Gofport fide, are three large circular forts or baftions, each mounted by two tire of Jhnie ancient Englilh Piiihri;.^^ at Cowciiy. 2.f) of cannon, one over the other, and cafeniatcd in fiich manner as to {ccure the r,iinners from all danger. Between the Spit and the entrance into Portrmoutli Harbour, the m:»lt heads of a large mrsnof war appear jnft above water; and near to them are two boats full of men, feemlngly in great diftrefs, rowing towards the Englifii fleet, and feveral dead bodies and parts of rigging arefeen floating on the water. This fcene is intended to fhew the fate of the Mary Rap, the fccond fliip in point of fize at that time belonging to the Englifh navy, which (hip funk at the very beginning of the cnp-a'^ement between the two fleets, by which accident Sir Ov^orge Carew, her commander, together with above fix hundred men then on board, except about forty, periflied in her. The Englifli hiflorians afcribe this accident to her being overladen with guns, her larger ones unbreeched, and her fea-ports open, - fo that in tacking, the water entered, and flie funk immediately ; and Mr. Burchet [^] tells us, that her lofs was occafioned by a little fway, which overfet her, her ports being made within fix- teen inches of the water. The French writers [5-] give a very different account, and infifl that (he was funk by the terrible fire of their cannon, and that no more than thirty-five of the crew cfcaped. In this cafe however, we may with the greater proba- bility rely on what our own countrymen tell us, not only 3s they were the mofl likely to know the real fafk, but as their accoiuit is in great meafure confirmed by the Cowdry pidure of v/hich I am now fpeaking. The Mary Rofe is here reprefented as juft funk, at a fmall diflance from the tail of the Spit : and the head- mofl of the French fhips is not nearer to her than St. Helen's. Point, which is far beyond the reach of their guns ; neither, are any of [^] Naval Hiflory, p. 340. .Sir William Monfcn, in hls Naval Tra£^.-, ^^vs .the fame. \q\ Du Bellai. F. Daniel, Hift, dc la iMiiics tie I a France. Gallard, Hift. ds Francois, I, .5v'c. thofc yy An Hljlorical Account of thofe Hiips reprcfented as firing; a circumftance which our painter,, whofe accuracy is remarkable, certainly would not have omitted, had the Mary Rofe been funk by the enemy's fire. One of the four gallies before-mentioned is indeed reprefented as firing her prow gun towards the place where the Mary Rofe funk ; but that galley lies^ at too great a diftance from it, and even in cafe fhe had been actually within gun-lhot, yet the weight of metal which the guns of fuch- gallies ufually carried, was not fufFicient to have effbdted fucH a cataftrophe. Another of the French gallies is feen firing at the Englifli Admiral's fhip, who returns that fire with her bow-chaces. This fhip was the Great Harry, on board of which the High Admiral Vifcount Lifle embarked. The royal ftandard of England is ftying ather enfign-ftaff and jack-fiaff; and at her main top-maft-head are hoifVed the colours of St. George. This fHij), the only one with three mails in the whole fquadron, hath her quarters and fides, according to the pradlice of thofe times, fortified with targets, charged with the crofs of St. George, and other heraidical devices, and is here reprefented as having all her fails fet, and bearing down upon the French fleet. Of the reft of the Englifli fquadron fome are underway, and others weigli- ing their anchors, and their top -fails fet. A little to the right of the Englifb fleet are fome of thofe pinnaces which the French called Rambarges, one of which is here reprefented under the ftern of a French galley, raking her fore and aft. Thefe pinnaces^ which were longer than ordinary, in proportion to their breadth, and much narrower than the galliesj as the French hiftorians acknowledge, vying in fwiftnefs with their gallies, and being well worked with oars and fails by our Englilh failors, bore down upon the French gallies with fuch impetuofity, and galled their fterns in fuch manner with their guns, the gallies having no can- fame ancient Englifii Paintings ai Covvdry. 3 1 cannon on their poops, that the French apprehended nothhig lefs than their total deftruclion. As the principal fhips in this pi£lure are reprefented with port- holes for their guns, it may not be improper to obferve, that, at the time of this engagement, that practice was not of a long Itanding, the making of fuch embrafures in the fides of fhips for putting through the muzzles of their cannon being brought into life fo late as the beginning of the fixteenth century. Previous to that time, they placed only a few cannon upon the deck of fuch Ihips as carried any, and upon the prow or poop, as is yet done in galeafTes, and upon the prow of gallies [r]. The fubjedl of the before-defcribed painting, fo far as it is therein reprefented, is evidently handled with the greateft atten- tion to truth ; all is regular, circumftantial, and intelligible, no- thing mifreprefented, difguifed, or confufed. The further tranf- aftions of the two fleets muft be gathered from the hiflorians; and they agree, that the French navy, galled by the Englifli pinnaces, and unable to draw our fleet into the main, twice landed fome forces on the Tfle of Wight, and on the coafl of Sullex, with- out any fuccefs ; and having, during the expedition, fuflfered a very confiderable lofs, retired, and flretching over to their own Cpaft, never attempted to approach England again. The fecond compartment, as before obferved, contains a bird's eye view of the procefliion of King Edward the Sixth, from the Tower of London, on the day before that of his coronation. The proceflSon is exhibited as coming out of the Tower of Lon- don, going along Eafl:cheap and Gracechurch-rftreet, thence down [r"] The earlieft reprefexitation of (hips of war having port-holes for their 'guns, which I have hitherto met with, is in a very remarkable piflure preferved at Cowdry, of the landing of the Emperor Charles V. at Dover, inlhe year; 1520, under the convoy of the Englifh fleet, commanded by the EarLof Southampton. E 2 Cornhill, 32 An H'lf.orkal Account of Cornhlll, and fo through Cheapfide, which h in tl:c cei^toi ofii-.f piece, and then continuing as far as the Temple. Our pldure reprelents it in the following or.^^r. — After an undiftinguifiied cavalcade, which are paffing the conduli; in Fleet- flreet, follow fix bifhops in their habits on horfcback, riding thrcq and three J — fix ecclefiafticks, being the King's chaplains, wearing their bonnets, and riding three and three ; — the archbifliop of Can- terbury's crofs- bearer, bare-headed, and mounted on a bay horfe, carrying the archieplfcopal crofs ; — the archbifliop of Canterbury, in a black gown, mounted on a bay horfe, on which is a foor- cloth of black velvet, with headflall and reins of the fame, itudded with gold , on his right hand the Emperor's ambafiador mount, d likeviife on a bay horfe; — Garter King at arms, and the Lord Ma vor of London, bearing the mace j — the Lord Protestor, bare-headed, drefled in a gown of cloth of gold, and riding on a black horfe, fumptuoufly caparifoned ; — the King in a gown of cloth of gold, wearing his hat and feather, mounted on a fl:ately courfer, richly caparifoned, and under a canopy of cloth of gold, fupportcd by ilaves of gold, carried by as many knights on horfeback ; — on the King's fight hand five henchmen on foot, bare-headed, dreiTed in doublets of fcarlet, yellow fi.ircoats, and red fiockings ; — Sir Anthony Brown, mafl:er of the horfe, mounted, and leadhig a horfe of ftate, richly trapped ; — a perfon in a long black cloak, with a black bonnet on his head, and mounted on a black horfe j — yeomen of the guard and henchmen ; — four horfemen in black, riding two and two ; — and then a great number of perfons on foot, who clofe the procefi^ion. In this piece the King appears as jufi; arrived at the great con- duit in Cheapfide, whereon are placed a number of emblematic jftatues, the whole being richly ornamented with many elegant devices. The balconico and windows of all the houfes on the left 5 hand p;ni ancient Englilh Paintings at Cowdry, 35 hand lule of ihi iircct are lillcrd with ladies, and, together with the walls from tht; very rooft downwards, appear to be covered with rich tapcHry, cloth of gold, carpets, arras, and hlftorlcal paintings, one whereof Is evlueiuly a copy from Raphael's famous pidure of St. George on horfeback, a print whereof is engraven by Volterman; whliitthe ihop vv'indows are fet out with cups, vafes, creufes, be- kcrs, and other elegant pieces of goldfmiths v/ork. The mafter of each houfe, in his beft apparel, is flanding at his (hop door, and felutlng the King. On the oppofite fide of the ftreet the fe- veral crafts or companies, drefied in their livery gowns, with the mafler of each at its head, form a line from the entrance of the Poultry to the weft end of Chcapfide, where the aldermen are Aand- ing. Over the archway of Ludgate is a band of mufic, and fun- dry perfons, reprefenting by their dreffes emblematical figures* Beyond Cheapfide is a beautiful view of St. Paul's church, its chapter houfe, &:c. and a triumphal arch. From Ludgate-rhill to the Temple, which terminates the piece, the fpace is very open, ijaving only two triumphal arches, and a few houfes Interfpcrfed here and there. Tiie back ground prefents a view of London bridge, the church of St. Mary Overies, the bifhop of Winchef- ter's palace, the fi:ews, and bankfide. These paintings have generally been afcribed to Hans Hol- bein ; but they certainly are not the work of that mafter nei- ther the landlkip, drawing, or colouring, are like his ; and, upon the whole, they are fomewhat inferior to any pidures now known to be the produdl of his pencil. The common opinion that they were painted by Holbein, might probably arlfe from his having refided fomc time at Cow- dry, where he was entertained by Sir Anthony Brown, and painted feveral excellent portraits, as alfo many of thofe fine heads which are now in the withdrawing-room on the ground floor next to , the garden. The 34 An Hijlorical Account of The reign of King Henry the Eighth, as I mentioned in a former Memoir, furniQied us with feveral ether painters, the names of many of whom are remembered in the Anecdotes of Painting in England; as Anthony Toto, LucaPenne, Johannes Corvus, Jerome de Trevifi, Jenet, Theodore Bernardi, Hornebrand, or Horrebout, Nicholas Lyfard, Wright, Cornelli, &c. And it is moft likely, that the paintings now under confideration were the work of one of thefe mafters, who probably might have received fome inftrudions •in regard thereto from Holbein. About the year 15 19 one Theodore Bernardi painted in the fouth tranfept of Chichefter cathedral the piaures of the Kings of England, and bifhops of that fee, and two hiftorical pieces rela- tive to the church, and afterwards fettled with his family in that part of Suflex. We are likewife told, that Jerome de Trevifi, who was an engineer as well as a painter, attended King Henry the Eighth to the fiege of Boulogne, in the former quality, and was there (lain, and that fome Iketches of that and other fieges, drawn by his hand, are preferved in a book in the Cotton Library. May we not then reafonably conjeaure,, that the feveral paint- ings on the walls of the great dining parlour at Cowdry were painted either by this Bernardi, or by one of his pupils ; and that, for the painter's more accurate defcription of the fiege of Bologne, he had poffeffed himfelf of fome of thofe drawings, which at the time of the fiege had been made by Trevifi. Cowdry is fituated fo near to Chichefter, which was the refi- dence of Bernardi, that Sir Anthony Brown, by whofe orders thefe piaures were undoubtedly painted, may reafonably be fuppofed to have feen his performances in the cathedral of that city, and to have been otherwife informed of his abilities as an hiftory painter. With equal probability we may fuggeft, that Sir Anthony Brown, who attended the King in his expedition againfi Boulogne, was ac- quainted fome ancient Engllfh Paintings at Cowdry. 3^ quainted with Jerome de Trevifi, and had procured feme, if not all the drawings which he had made of the fiege of that place, and of the Englifli encampments, in order that tbofe circumftances might with the greater accuracy be reprefented in the pifttires with which he intended to adorn his favourite Cowdry. Whoev^er was the painter, all further enquiry about him is unnccefTary. It is very juftly remarked by the ingenious author of Anec- dotes of Painting in England, that the hiflories, habits, and cuf- toms, of the times, reprefented in the paintings at Cowdry, make the room that contains them a fmgular curiofity ; but when he proceeds to fay, that they are its only merit, and "that there is nothing good either in the defigns, difpofition, or colouring, I muft diflent from him in that opinion. In thofe hiftory pieces which are in great meafure the produdl of imagination, the fubjeft may be treated, and the ftory told, in whatever manner the fertile genius of the mailer may fuggeft. Alle- gorical and emblematical figures may be introduced, and their form, attitude, drefs, and grouping, maybe conformable to the painter's fole will and pleafure ; his landflcips, buildings, and embellifh- nients, may be of his own formation ; and the defign, difpofition, and colouring of the whole, may be fuch as he (hall think be ft adapted to produce a good effeit, and to form that, which, ac- cording to the rules of his art, may juftly be pronounced a beau- tiful and mafterly pifture j but when an exadt reprefentation of fome inftruftive and remarkable tranfaftion that happened within the knowledge of the painter, together with all its attendant cir- cumftances, is intended to be recorded by his pencil, in order to preferve and hand down to pofterity a juft and compleat idea of the real fadt exa£lly as it happened, the cafe is different ; and he is in every refpeft confined to the faithful and minute ob- fervance of truth, accuracy, and exaftnefs, and that without the lea ft 50 yhi Hijhncal ^ccQWifi Sec. Jcalt addition, diminution, or variation. It Is upon fuch plan that 111; d. fign mull necc/rarily be formed. His landlkip is to be the real t j'-e of the country whereon the bulinefs he is reprefenting- was trjnfacied ; and the buildings fuch, and fuch only, as then flood thereon. The difpofition of thofe buildings, as well as of lijs figures, and all other things fubfervient to the ftory, muft be fuch as in fa£l they aflually were. The form and colours of his habits are to be fuch as the perfons reprefented really wore at the time, and the colouring of every objed in the piece muft be that which really diftinguifhed it, and belonged thereto. Under thefe circumftances the paintings in the dining parlour at Cowdry were evidently formed. Whoever will be at the pains of comparing them with the account and defcriptlons given of the tranfaftions they reprefent, by the contemporary hiftorians, and with the ap- pearance of the country and buildings thefe pidures exhibit, will find, that the painter's pencil hath throughout the whole been guided by that drift conformity to truth and faft, which will more than fufficiently atone for any other defefts in the requilitcs for producing a beautiful painting. THE GETTY CENTPH