British Medical Journal, Jime 27th. 18^6 THE THE JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION. INCLUDING AN EPITOME OE CURRENT MEDICAL LITERATURE. EDITED EOB THE ASSOCIATION BY ERNEST HART, D.C.L. 0 ASSISTED BY DAWSON WILLIAMS, M.D. VOLUME I FOR 1896 January to June. Eontion: PRINTED AND PUBLISHED BY THE BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION AT THEIR OFFICE, 429, STRAND. 5 MDCCCXCVI Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2018 with funding from Getty Research Institute https://archive.org/details/reportonapplicatOOrowl Feb. 8, 1896.J CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY. I" The British L'Teihcal Journal 361 REPORT ON THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY TO MEDICINE AND SURGERY. [Report to the British Medical Journal.] I. We have commissioned Mr. Sidney Rowland to investigate the application of Roentgen’s discovery and to study prac¬ tically its applications. He is employed now in doing so, and with some interesting results. Any of our members who may have suitable cases of interest which they desire to have investigated by the new photography are invited to com¬ municate with us. Mr. Rowland writes to us as follows : Not much further light has been thrown on the nature of the new radiation since the discovery was announced. The interest in the subject has not diminished, and numerous communications have appeared; yet it is hard to find any matter of importance as to this very difficult problem. In England, Air. Gifford, of Chard, has been working hard, and has produced many curious results, it is true, but none that are in any way explanatory of the new discovery. The chief difficulty in making rapid headway consists in the scarcity of suitable tubes, the whole of the English stock having been bought up almost on the first receipt of the intelligence from Germany, and of these but a small proportion have been found to be of any use. Fresh arrivals are daily coming in, and some are being made in Germany. As many of our readers are probably already trying the new method, a de¬ scription of the actual appliances employed may be of use, together with some hints as to the choice of apparatus and good methods of working. The Choice of a Coil and Transformer. First, as to the coil. This must be a fairly large one, say 7-inch spark. It must be a really good instrument, made by a reliable maker; the cheaper French coils are of no use. It is important to have sufficient battery power, for want of this is the most frequent cause of failure in coil work. Dry cells are of no use at all, and bichromate batteries fall off so rapidly that they are unsuitable for the long exposures sometimes neces¬ sary. The best form of battery is undoubtedly Groves’s or Bunsen’s. A street supply from a company’s mains, if avail¬ able, can be used with the least trouble. In using it, how¬ ever, care must be taken to transform it to a suitable pressure. Although results undoubtedly can be obtained by the use of a coil alone, yet the best so far have been obtained by using a small Testa transformer. These transformers can now be obtained from the instrument maker of suitable size for coils from 2-incli spark and upwards. Their effect is to raise the frequency of alternation of the current to an exceedingly high pitch. The choice of the tube is the most important matter. Too much care cannot be devoted to this. The vacuum must be exceedingly high ; nothing else is of the slightest use. Before purchasing one it should be tried by the instrument maker, and the character of the dis¬ charge noticed. If the tube lights up with an apparently uniform whitish green glow, then the tube may be expected to give good results ; if, however, the discharge is continuous from pole to pole the vacuum is a low one, and the tube use¬ less for the purpose in view. The character of the glow as noticed by the eye can be taken as a fairly good criterion as to the possible performance of the tube. The glow should, I find, foe of a whitish purplish colour, quite distinct from the green fluorescence of the glass. Great care must be taken of such a tube, and when in use it must be most carefully insulated, for a frequent cause of destruction of good tubes is the break¬ ing through of the discharge to some neighbouring good con¬ ductor. The tubes must be suspended by silk threads from a glass support, and carefully cleaned on the outside. Mr. Gifford’s Results : their Explanation. Mr. Gifford’s work has already been alluded to. He has found, among other things, that it is possible to photograph through opaque bodies without a tube at all, using simply the brush discharge from one of the dischargers of a large coil. In this way he lias produced images of coins quite distinctly. I have repeated these experiments, using, instead of a coil discharge, that from a Testa transformer, with the result that I have obtained not only the shadow of the coin on the plate, but a perfect picture of the engraving on the coin. Mr. Gifford argues from these experiments that Roentgen x rays are not of the nature of light, but rather of an electrical effect. But this argument fails, I think, in the light of the following ex¬ periment. In this case the penny was placed behind the plate, so as to avoid the possibility of any shadow effect, and with exactly the same result—namely, a faithful image of the im¬ pression of the coin. It is obvious, therefore, that we have here to do with an electrical contact effect, and not with Roentgen rays at all. As to the best plates to employ, I have found the best results from isochromatics of high rapidity developed with pyro and soda. There is thus no insuperable difficulty in working the new process ; it only needs care in details and the careful selection of the tube. The latest form is of this shape, one electrode being an aluminium plate and the other a ring. The plate should be the cathode. With an apparatus of this description, which is not very bulky, and only requires care in working, it is quite possible for anyone to obtain negatives that will show all that has been shown up to the present. The accompanying hand (p. 363) was taken by me with such an apparatus with an exposure of twenty minutes. Professor S. P. Thompson’s conclusions up to the present are : 1. That success depends more on the degree of exhaustion (of the tube) than anything else. Only the highest exhaustion is of use. 2. Sharply defined shadows need as a source a small bulb. 3. The x rays do not emanate exclusively, as has been sup¬ posed, from the phosphorescent patches on the glass. On the contrary, he has cases of double shadows cast by one tube, where the stronger shadow was shown as by rays emanating straight from the cathode, while the weaker one was thrown as by rays emanating at the phosphorescent patch. 4. Professor Thompson finds diamond to be more opaque than black carbon. 5. In wood (pine) the dark resinous streaks are more trans¬ parent than the lighter coloured tissue. 6. A specimen of flies in amber shows no shadow of the flies. 7. There appears to be no difference in the degree of opacity of magnetised and non-magnetised iron. Professor Thompson and Professor Lodge agree in regard¬ ing the rays as rather of the nature of sound waves than of light. But they differ as to the length, the one considering them as excessively short, the other (probably) as longer than the rays of visible light. And these embody all that can be definitely stated at present. It is hoped that next week photographs of cases will be ready demonstrating the practical application of the new discovery. Someof the earliest endeavours to apply Professor Roentgen’s discovery not only to diagnosis but to treatment are reported from Vienna. Professor Mosetig was the first to utilise the new method. At the Medical Society he reported two cases in which operative procedures were carried out under the guid¬ ance of the exact knowledge of the anatomical conditions ob¬ tained by the new radiation. The accompanying illustrations 62 The British 1 Medical .Tourna' j CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY. [Feb. 8 , i8q6. are reproductions of photographs of the cases which were taken by Roentgen’s method in Professor Franz Exner’s Phy¬ sical Institute. The first case is one of deformity of the distal phalanx of the hallux, which appeared to be double. This diagnosis had already been made without the help of the new photography, but there was a difficulty in distin¬ guishing which of the two bones was the normal one and which the supernumerary. As this could not be made out, Professor Mosetig would have had to resort to remove the whole of the double distal phalanx. The Roentgen photo¬ graphy showed, however, that only one of the two bones (the lateral one) articulated with the first phalanx, while the other was merely a supernumerary appendix, articulating with the normal distal phalanx by a sort of facette, dis¬ tinctly to be seen in the photograph. Besides the great comfort it afforded to the patient to see with his own eyes the real condition of his abnormality before having a part of his body removed, the surgeon was enabled to spare the normal phalanx. In the other case the situation of a revolver bullet could be exactly made out after every other method had failed. The bullet had imbedded itself into the fourth interosseous space of the right hand, and become tightly fixed to the fifth meta¬ carpal bone. The photograph shows ..clearly the bullet and the slight deformity caused by it in the metacarpal bone. In this case also the surgeon’s hand'was guided by the photo¬ graph, and the bullet was easily removed. These photographs were taken by means of a very larg'e Ruhm-Korff inductor, the exposure being two hours, for which time the patient’s limb had to lie directly (and quietly) on the box with the sensitive plate. This seems a great drawback of the method, but good photographs have since been obtained after a much shorter exposure. Professor Neusser was the first to attempt the application of the new discovery to medical diagnosis. He had photo¬ graphs taken, outside the body, of gallstones and of a vesical calculus, the latter consisting of phosphates, which proved quite impenetrable to Roentgen’s rays, while the cholesterine stones were not quite opaque. The photograph of the latter was taken through a layer of calf’s liver 4 centimetres thick. The results were so promising that Professor Neusser intends soon to give the method a trial on the living patient. Herr E. Haschell and Dr. 0 . Th. Lindentlml have made experiments in the Physico-Chemical Institute of Professor Franz Exner, of Vienna. 1 In the finger of a colleague, through which a pistol bullet had passed many years before, they were able to shoiv the injured bone in which the loss of osseous.tissue had been made good by callus. They also suc¬ ceeded in photographing the bones of a child’s arm, forearm, and foot, but they failed in their attempts to get pictures of the bones of the skull and trunk. On a dead hand, how¬ ever, after injection, they were able to photograph the blood vessels. This seems to open up a new possible application of the method to the teaching of anatomy. Professor Adolph and Dr. Lenz, of Elberfeld, seem to have been successful in a further modification, or rather extension, of the Roentgen photography. They announce that they are able to photograph the bones of thicker parts of the body than the hand—such, for instance, as the arm and wrist; and, further, that their method enables them to photograph not only the bones but the connective tissue. In France experiments are being made in the laboratories by Professor Lannelongue and MM. Perrin, Ma scarf, and Oudin. M. Gariel, Professor of Physics in the Paris Medical Faculty, doubts whether the new photography can be so generally applied in medicine and surgery as at first sight it was supposed. He asks how this method can be applied to the greater number of the organs contained in the human body. In the thorax, for instance, the organs placed behind the sternum and those in front of the vertebral column would not by made clear. The same difficulty applies almost equally to photography of the stomach, liver, kidney, and heart. M. Gariel asserts that in order to obtain infor¬ mation by this method of photography the organs under examination must be photographed by diffusion not by transparency. Perhaps this step in advance will be realised, but at present there are no indications which permit the hypothesis; even were it so an “image” mus t be uro- 1 Wien . klin . Wochenschrifl , January 23rd. duced and not a “shadow” on the sensitive plate. There must be discovered reflecting and refractive methods of acting on the rays in the same way as concave mirrors- and lenses act on ordinary light rays. Research has shown that these rays are not submitted to refraction nor to regular- reflection in the conditions under which they have been studied. It would perhaps be rash to say that these effects will never be manifested under other conditions, but Pro¬ fessor Gariel considers it to be barely probable. He acknow¬ ledges the importance of the results of the application of the Roentgen method made by M. Lannelongue, already noticed in the British Medical Journal, but he points out that they in no way invalidate the conclusions summarised above. The cliche examined by the Academicians present when M. Lannelongue made his communication showed that there are white patches in the midst of the shadow thrown by the bone, proving, as M. Lannelongue had previously affirmed, that the destruction of the osseous tissue operates from the centre to the periphery, not from the periphery to the centre. All the three cases photographed were simple. It is precisely in these that the method of photography by the new radiation will be of service. From Montpelier comes also testimony to the possi¬ bilities of the new photography. Three lecturers in that medical school have succeeded in photographing a 5-franc piece which was placed inside a purse, and had four folds of leather between it and the apparatus. The form of the money came out distinctly on the photographic plate, as did also the shape and texture of the purse. THE NEW KIND OF RADIATION. Sir, —It is known that cultures of the bacillus of tubercle are sterilised by direct sunlight. So far as I am aware, no differential experiments have been made to ascertain whether this result is produced by sunlight in its totality, or, if not, by what part of the spectrum. It is certainly possible that the violet or ultra-violet rays may be the active agent. This suggests the desirability of determining by direct experi¬ ment whether the new radiant has or has not a sterilising effect upon tubercle bacillus. It is superfluous to point out that should this prove to be the case, it- would place in our hands that which has been for some time our highest aspiration—namely, a means of sterilising the tubercle bacillus in situ within the body. Even the lungs, though partially protected by impermeable ribs, would not be entirely withdrawn from this influence.—I am, etc., Birmingham, Jan. 28th. WILLOUGHBY WADE, F.R.O.P. *** This letter, received last week, was, in the pressure on our columns, inadvertently omitted from the last number of the Journal. A bacteriological department has been established at the Central London Throat, Nose, and Ear Hospital, and Mr. St. George Reid has been appointed to take charge of it for twelve months. A meeting of the South-Western Division of the Medico- Psychological Association will be held at Barnwood House, Gloucester, on Tuesday, April 14th. After the election of new members the report of the Committee on Criminal Re¬ sponsibility will be considered, to be followed by a discussion on the Nursing Staff in Asylums. Cholera and Typhoid Fever in Indta.— The next annual 1 report of the Sanitary Commissioner with the Government of India will, the Pioneer Mail states, contain an interesting summary of all the evidence regarding the comma bacillus and its relation to cholera. The question of epidemic typhoid will also be dealt with in this report, which is to be issued during the current month. Royal Maternity Charity.— The annual meeting of the governors of this charity was held on February 4th at the Society’s house, 31, Finsbury Square, under the presidency of Dr. Robert Barnes. The 140th annual report, which was read by Mr. J. W. Long, the secretary, stated that last year the charity nurses ministered to 4,445 poor married women in their hour of trial. That was the-largest number of patients relieved by the institution in any one year since 1825, and it was very satisfactory to state that out of the large number only four women died. CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY I" The British | Medical Journal 363 Feb. 8 , 1896.] Roentgen photography of the normal human hand. Roentgen photograph o£ hand showing bullet wound. Roentgen photograph of foot showing supernvpnerary phalanx. 364 The British "I Medical Journal] CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF TIIE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY [Feb. 8, 1896, Feb. 15, 1856.] THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY. L The British Medical Journal 431 Inductograms of various coins, showing the possibility of photography without a Crookes’s tube the effect being due to a contact effect. In the second figure the coins were placed behind the plate.—Sydney Rowland (photo.) REPORT ON THE APPLICATION OF THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY TO MEDICINE AND SURGERY. [Report to the British Medical Journal.] II. Mr. Sydney Rowland, B.A., reports that the past week has not been fruitful of so much advance as could have been wished, and beyond the strength that experi¬ ment and personal experience of the new method has given, the developments have been rather of the nature of defining the difficulties and causes of failure than of removing them. Owing to the loss of the best tube it has not been possible to apply the method clinically, as was hoped last week, except in the case to be alluded to. New tubes are, however, to hand, and progress is again being made. For the benefit of other workers it may be of use to give at length the chief difficulties that I have found, and the best means of surmounting them. First and foremost among the causes of failure must be placed the deficiencies in the tube itself. It does not seem possible at present to define with any accuracy what kind of tube is most suitable ; this can only be found by actual ex¬ periment. In the tube itself there are several causes of pos¬ sible defect. First as to the degree of the vacuum necessary. Certainly this must be “ high,” but on the other hand not too high. If too “ low,” the discharge simply breaks from pole to pole in a continuous stream ; if too high, on the other hand, it is not possible to excite it without using very powerful cur¬ rents such as are not always available. It seems, therefore, to be a question of hitting the balance between the degree of exhaustion, the strength of the current, and the frequency of interruption ; at least this is my experience. The tube with which the hand published last week was taken would certainly not be called a very high vacuum tube, and yet it gave, when the current was adjusted to it, and only then,. very excellent results. The tube figured last week has failed in my hands to give any results at all, and yet I hear that other workers using the same tube have been able to produce- good results, possibly because in their case the current used was just suitable to the degree of exhaustion. To sum up, then, with regard to the tube : It is little more than a matter of chance at present whether any given tube will produce results or not; having a tube the current must be adjusted to it, and even then it may not give results. New light on these points is most urgently needed before the new method can become an accepted means of clinical diagnosis,, and can be shed only by accurate and laborious physical' experiments. It is only to be hoped that the many workers- now engaged in investigating Professor Roentgen’s rays will soon tell us something on these points. With regard to my statement last week that Mr. Gifford’s results without using a Crookes’s tube were not due to- Roentgen’s rays, the following letter has been received: Sir,— In the British Medical Journal of February 8th r li. 361, I note that Mr. Sydney Rowland, in his report on the? “ new photography,” refers to the results I obtained without using a Crookes’s tube. Will you permit me to remove a mis¬ apprehension ? He says lie'has produced “not only,” as I did, “the shadow of the coin on the plate, but a perfect picture of the engraving on the coin.” I have not done this ; the discs I used had numbers stamped on them, but neither THE NEW PHOTOGRAPHY. [Feb. 15, 1896. 432 The British "I Medical JournalJ Plio':ograpli of a human foot by Mr. Sydney Rowland, showing the deformity of the terminal phalanges owing to the use of tight boots. Owing to the plate being accidentally broken, the metatarsal bones are not visible. these nor any other surface markings were reproduced. From what I have referred to, he argues that 1 have represented the x rays as being a direct electrical effect of this kind. That is not so. My ideas, which are quite as indefinite as those of others at the present stage of the inquiry, were and are that these are electrical wave phenomena. My meaning will be clear to those at all versed in the doctrines and teaching of Hertz. The effects Mr. Rowland refers to are nothing new. These induction phenomena were present in my experiments both with and without the tube in the form of spark and brush discharge between the discs of a most interesting form, and are a distinctly different class of phenomena from the shadow ■effect. But their appearance in experiments made with a Crookes’s tube, as well as without, seemed to point to a possible identity of the shadow effect with and without.— I am, etc., Chard, w.C., Feb. 9th. J. William Gifford. I may be perhaps allowed to say that Mr. Gifford does not apparently know what he means, and what he now writes in no way invalidates the comment. My point is tlie fact that in my experiments it was immaterial whether the coin was placed in front of or behind the photographic plate, and that therefore such effects could not be the result of shadows thrown by the coin on the plate. And as this is the essence of the new photography, it was argued that the effect to which he refers was not due to .rrays, but of the nature of a direct electrical effect, the same or similar to the well-known in- duetograms. Figs, a and b show the results I obtained and alluded to last week. Fig. a was taken with the coin in front of the plate, and Fig. b with the coin placed behind the plate. My photograph of the foot, which is reproduced above, shows very clearly the nature of the bone changes and atrophy pro¬ duced by the wearing of tight boots, and the accompanying history given by the patient may be of use in the explanation and treatment of similar symptoms when again met with. The owner of this foot says that when a child she was obliged to wear boots which were made to measure, and were consequently supposed to fit. She remembers well the tor¬ ture consequent on new boots, and the pain particularly pro¬ duced in the little and fourth toes. In fact, later on, when a girl, the constant aching pain in both the fourth toes became so great that boots were discarded for shoes, and walking became a penance. She says she frequently expressed a wish to have the fourth toes amputated. She had no comfort in walking till she wore broad, square-toed French boots, and since then she has not suffered. Therefore the toes are very deficient in prehensile power, and she has frequent falls. From Professor Roentgen have been received copies of the photographs taken by him which are now so familiar. They include one of a fracture of the forearm with much displace¬ ment. The lesion shows quite clearly on the photograph, but it has not been possible to reproduce it. Professor Roentgen has also sent a signed photograph of himself, which it is hoped to reproduce shortly. Mr. Robert Jones, of Liverpool, and Dr. Dawson Turner are both kind enough to send specimens of their work, which, how¬ ever, as yet shows nothing new ; so already the new method is being taken up by medical men in actual practice. Feb. 15, 1896.] THE EOENTGEN RAYS. The British Medical Journal Professor Oliver Lodge also sends a negative showing the position of a bullet in a wrist, but too late for publication this week. In regard to the newspaper reports describing the alleged production of Roentgen photographs by means of the light emitted from paraffin lamps and bunsen burners it is not possible to speak at present. Such results seem very impro¬ bable, and until more is known about them and actual speci¬ mens of the work done come to hand we must rest content with the reports. THE NEW KIND OF RADIATION. Sir,— Should it be proved, as Sir Willoughby Wade has suggested, that the bactericidal rays of sunlight are identical with Roentgen’s x rays, or even if they can be proved to be similar in their penetrating power without being actually of the same kind, the fact will open up a wide field in thera¬ peutics. For not only only is the tubercle bacillus destroyed by exposure to sunlight, but a number of other bacilli and pathogenic organisms of various kinds are similarly affected. It is interesting to note that as long ago as 1888 1 Dr. R. L. Bowles recognised the interesting and important fact that in Alpine regions a peculiar photo-cliemical effect was due to certain rays reflected from large areas on masses of snow, and that these rays penetrated to a certain depth below the sur¬ face of the skin, causing in summer severe sunburn, and in winter a characteristic brownish staining. Further, he has demonstrated the fact that these same rays act upon the wood of which the chalets are built, penetrating the wood to a considerable depth, and that these rays acted primarily on the resin of the wood; and it is somewhat remarkable that Professor S. P. Thompson has arrived at a similar conclusion as to the effect of Roentgen’s rays upon resinous wood. I was influenced by the views thus expressed by Dr. Bowles when at the discussion on the Latency of Disease Germs at the Royal Medical and Chirurgical Society on December 10th, 1895. I suggested as a possible explanation of the thera¬ peutical influence of sunlight in phthisis that the bactericidal rays had a power of penetrating deeply into the tissues of the body. I made this suggestion before Roentgen’s discoveries and his “ bone-shadow ” pictures had become known to anyone in this country. I think with Sir Willoughby Wade that it is most important to ascertain whether there is any relation, and if any, what kind of relation, between the Roentgen arrays and the bactericidal rays already assumed to be part and parcel of the sun’s light.—I am, etc., W. Spencer Watson, M.B., F.R.C.S. Henrietta Street, W., Feb. nth. Re ROENTGEN RAYS AND TISSUE TRANSPARENCY. Sir,— It may interest you to know that, in conjunction with my colleague, Professor Kuenen, I have been testing the relative transparency to Roentgen rays (generated for a Crookes’s tube) of various tissues from the same animal (cat), placed in slices 3 mm. thick over a photographic plate, separated by light proof black paper and gutta-percha tissue. The tissues used were bone, cartilage, fat, liver, muscle, kidney, cerebrum, and cerebellum. Of these, bone was the most, and cartilage the least, opaque. Fat was more trans¬ parent than any of those remaining on the list. In the kidney the cortex was far more transparent than the medulla (the outlines of the bases of the Malpighian pyramids being very distinct in the region of the boundary zone), while in the brain, in both cerebrum and cerebellum, the white matter was more transparent than the grey. Transparency, then, is not related to water content of tissue, a fact evident enough from the transparency of the nails in the hand and foot photographs. An experiment with a slice of cancerous human liver, kindly supplied by Dr. Stalker, showed no difference in 1 transparency of the cancerous and normal parts.—I am, etc., E. Waymouth Reid, Professor of Physiology in University College, Dundee. <3r. H.—Glass is only relatively opaque to the x rays ; for this reason the latest form of tube is made with very thin ends. Some maintain that lie x rays are generated at the glass surface by impact of other rays. 1 Sunburn and curiously enough the coils of pied bytlie^tomach^ 6 aW them iS evidentl y <* a t occu- the Ir hw!l lia f,i nderSOn ’ / 4 C - S " Professor of Anatomy in ti 7 Academy, and Lecturer on Anatomy at St Thomas s Hospital, to whom an early proof of the plate has been submitted, writes as follows : “Mr. Rowland is to be con- gratulated warmly upon his success. The skiagraph is ad- of tLe 6 ’ and °P en f U P a world of speculation as to the utility of the process m the medicine and surgery of the future Tim most noticeable features are the clear definition of the ossific centres m the vertebne, the sharp line of the dianhv^s parency of UC thl “ah- coif / 1 ^ Une ’ the comparative trans- u- i tle , air-containing viscera, the lun^s etc and the dimly shown outline of the liver and heart ’ It, is Tm°+ US tbat the 1 ] iac crest doPS not throw a good shadow Uw transparency of the bone shadow itself is weH exemnlV fled in the crossing of the radius and ulna.” pU As I have received so many applications for copies of the P otographs which have been reproduced in these reports I have placed all the negatives with the London Stereoscopic Company, from whom photographs may be obtained. P Detection of a Coin lodged in the Intestine In another case I have been able to obtain a negative of the pelvis vertebral column, and lower part of the thorax of a much older child. The case will be published L full at a j ate 7 r P pnod - The child, aged 6 years, swallowed a halfpenny in November last; since that time she has had constant symptoms pointing to the retention of the coin The skiagraph showed the halfpenny lying on the right iliac bone it had evidently lodged at the ileo-csecal valve. & ’ S “®f HOP THE Elbow-Joint: Subluxation of Radius THE pS enT 11 ^a° r tV S fr ° mDr : .{• D - Cree(W. Hampstead): ioTni? L ^ H ’’ a , tllin boy with exceptionally extensible °‘ nt -, now. nearly 13 years of age. Two years and a-half ago, whilst climbing a tree, he fell and injured his riMit elbow-]omt He was not seen till several hours after the accident, when the swelling prevented diagnosis. After this swelling hail somewhat subsided a dislocation of both bones backwaids was discovered, which was reduced. No further fniiV Was reco ? msc 5 d - -Patient never completely regained full flexion or extension of the joint, although nearly so and tL 0 a P T f ( °r f r lts de ^ibility I may mention that a year after the accident II. gained a medal at his school for gymnastics A “ ondl a go my attention was called to ILj as it was oticed that his elbow-joint was not so freely movable as formerly, and that he was acquiring the habit of usino- his left hand on occasions, such as in drinking, when before he would have used his right. On examination I found pronation and supination normal, but flexion and extension greatly diminished from what was possible a year ago. There was no marked tenderness to be made out. The head of the radius seemed to be enlarged and partially displaced outwards By measurements I found the distances between the external" and internal condyles and between the olecranon and the jSfofi&&&*»' ndius '«“ <«•*«*— Tanking this to be a case in which Roentgen’s x rays nught be a great aid to diagnosis, and prove or disprove an early tuberculous lesion or some injury to the epiphysis, ? biought H. under the notice of Mr. Sydney Rowland who very kindly made three skiagraphs for me. from^before tjackwards!’ CXtended as much a ® possible, seen n f - beft elbow-joint semiflexed, seen from before backwards. (In this my attempt to obtain a shadow, thrown with an failed) 3 ^ &nS 6 t0 th&t from the bones of the right arm, has 3. The right elbow-joint, flexed as much as possible, seen from without inwards. ’ offh^S^fi the . t 7? skiagraphs the outward subluxation ?, the head, of the light radius is at once apparent. Beyond “ s ] . sa , gei \ eral enlargement of all the bones forming the elbow-joint; but this may be accounted for in part by parallax the two arms were not in an identical posture nor was the Crookes s tube in the same relative position ti°o C i aC u ar m dmmg the exposure. This is shown best in the heads of the radii—in the left, the epiphysis is seen end on whilst m the right an oblique view is obtained these skiagraphs I think that any diagnosis beyond hypothltical 3 Subluxatlon of the head of the radius would be J^±?f[ aph -’ f i the K ft an< ? uninj ured elbow is interesting, as iy it from the epiphysial nuclei of the lower end of the humerus ie age of the patient can be verified. The nucleus for the trochlea which appears in the nth or 12th year is small but distinct, whilst that for the external condyle, which should develop 111 the 13th or 14th year, is absent. THE DETECTION OF NEEDLES IN THE EXTREMITIES. Localisation and Extraction of Needle deeply „ ... . SEATED IN THE FOOT. mil owing case furnishes a good illustration of the value nLufn a' F botography m diagnosis and in determining the position of foreign bodies when too deeply seated to be ascertained definitely by the usual methods On the night of November 8th, 1895, about n p.m., a lady was staying with some friends, after retiring to bed, got up and walked across her room for some cough lozenges that were on the dressing table. In doing so she caught her foot a , galn f a ru f ’ and an acute pain in the sole of her foot close to the ball of the big toe. She struck a light, and after fin a d C the g o 0 thp, he f fl00r f0 f nd m piece of needle > but could not find the otliei fragment. There was blood oozing from a puncture m her foot, and she suspected the missing piece was left in it. About 2 a.m. she awoke with excruciate pain in the big toe joint, and could not sleep again. Next W cmlfnH 6 consulted a surgeon, who, after examining the Si an op'aion that there was no niedle i the foot, and that she was suffering from gout. She was tieated for tins complaint for over three weeks without home 1 benefit S ° far ES pain and swelling went, and’returned , d T wa ? as ked to see her the following day, and after listening to the history came to the conclusion tliat there was apiece feeHthv th P tbe b ? 1 ° f f h , e toe, but it was not possible to H wnt Jnl 14 ca i' eful palpation. I explained to her that t would be rash treatment to cut down and explore for it without having a definite idea of its position, and pursued a oothing and expectant treatment. When a few weeks ago the new photography astonished the world, I at once decided to Hr V I r !i' pi? Photographed. This was successfully done by Di. Ha 1 Edwards, of Birmingham, and plainly showed the need le lynig obliquely against the metataiso-phalangeal joint of the big toe. On this I proceeded to operate. The position of the needle being clearly defined in the photograph there was no difficulty 1,1 marking its site on the skin by means of So8 The British 1 Medical Journal J THE BATTLE OF THE CLUBS. [March 28, 1896. a pencil. A puncture was then made with a tenotomy knife transverse to the direction of the needle, when the edge of the knife struck it at once. An incision was made in the line of the needle, which was very deep, owing to swelling and rather tieshy foot and lying against the bone. It was then seized with a dressing forceps, and, not being possible to take it out through the wound, one end was made to project against the web of the foot between the big and next toe; a small incision was made over it, and with some force it was drawn out. After being in four and a-half months it had become very firmly fixed and oxidised. Its length was just under an inch. Ashby-de-la-Zoucli. Chas. It. WILLIAMS, M.B., C.M.Edin. Determination of the Position of Broken Needles in the Hand. On February 27th A. E. came to me with the history of having a piece of needle in her hand. Some months before she had dropped a needle on the carpet, and in feeling for it the eye end ran in her hand and broke off, leaving about half an inch in it, but as it could not be seen it was left, in the hope that it would work to the surface. She had very little pain, except in grasping anything. Messrs. Newton and Co., of Fleet Street, kindly photo¬ graphed the case for me with their new focus tube, and the result is very interesting, as showing the great improvements that have already been made ; exposure, two minutes. The piece of needle was situated right in front of the third meta¬ carpal bone diagonally from the surface to the bone. The hand was placed with the palmar aspect downwards, so that the .?• rays had to penetrate the bone before reaching the needle, which they did most perfectly. Another point of interest is that the structure of the bone can be readily seen, and the nails are also easily seen. The position being so clearly shown, I made an incision only three-eigliths of an inch in length, and with a small pair of forceps seized the end of the needle and drew it out. Crouch End. Al t G. C. Dove, M.D. On March 16th Professor Barrett, assisted by Mr. Jefcote, at the Royal College of Science, Dublin, took skiagraphs of a woman, a patient of mine, who had a needle in her hand for the past two years and a-half. She consented to its removal when its position was defined, and I accordingly removed it with comparative ease from the hand, making the incision parallel to the little finger metacarpal bone, and going under the muscles of the little finger. The skiagraph had shown that it was on the palmar side of the hand. The history is shortly as follows : J. E., a housemaid, when dusting a press two years and a-half ago, felt a needle run into her hand; the sharp end broke off, and the eye end run into the muscles of the hypo- thenar eminence. Under cocaine I at the time endeavoured to find the fragment in the hand, but failed to do so. I poulticed and stuped the hand in hopes the needle would come out through the enlarged wound, but it did not. The wound healed quickly, and the woman only complained of shooting pains up the arm and into the little and ring fingers, and at times cramps in the muscles of the hand, causing her to cry out and drop anything she was holding. For about the past twelve months these pains and cramps were less frequent, may be once or twice a month, until recently, when they be¬ came more frequent. The pain latterly was referred always to the base of the fingers proper on the palmar surface, or the wrist proper (also palmar surface), or up the arm, but near to where the skiagraph pointed out the needle to be situated, and where it was accordingly found at the operation. I was assisted at the operation by my colleague Mr. Swan, and Mr. E. Hamilton and Mr. Bennett, Consulting Surgeon to the hospital, were also present; Dr. W. Hamilton gave the anaes¬ thetic, and Messrs. Burke and Piers-Smith (my dressers) also gave able assistance. Richard Bolton M‘Cadsland, Sen. Mod. T.C.D., M.D., F.R.C.S.I., Dublin. Surgeon to Steevens Hospital. Needle embedded in Hand; Extraction after Localisa¬ tion by Means of the Roentgen Rays. I send a note of this case, not because of any intrinsic value that the rays had in facilitating the removal of the needle, for it could be quite plainly felt, but on account of the ex¬ cellence of the skiagraph, for which I am indebted to the kindness of Mr. H. Jackson, of the Chemical Laboratory. It shows that the point of the needle is embedded on the anterior surface of the base of the fifth metacarpal bone—a condition verified at the time of removal. Mr. Jackson, rotating the hand between the tube and his luminous screen, enabled 11s to see that the needle had run in front of the bones, and not behind—a point that could not otherwise be made out, as the end of the needle could be felt in the middle of the inner border of the hand, and it was not possible to say into which side, palmar or dorsal, of the hand the point had gone. The patient, who was intensely interested in the pro¬ ceedings, was sent me by Dr. T. D. Manning, of Reigate. F. F. Burghard, M.S.Lond., F.R.C.S., Assistant Surgeon to King's College Hospital. Needle in Hand : Removal. L. D., a dressmaker, some weeks ago ran a portion of a needle into the thenar eminence of her right hand. When she came to my surgery next day there was no trace of the needle to be found ; since then she has complained of a large amount of pain along the side of the forefinger. On Tuesday last, by the kindness of Mr. C. M. Dorman, we took a skia¬ graph by the new process. The needle showed plainly. Tak¬ ing the metacarpal bone as a guide, we cut down parallel with the bone and removed the needle. Patricroft. W. M. Hamilton, M.D. Wanted—a Name. Dr. David Walsh (Temple, E.C.) writes: Your interesting editorial of March 14th drew attention to the want of a comely and convenient term for what is now known as “ the new photography. Perhaps I may ven¬ ture to suggest “ shadowtype” or “ shade picture” as possible names. The word " shade print,” again, could be made to cover a good deal of the ground. At any rate, the use of such expressions as “shadow printing" or “shade printing” a fracture, or “a needle was shade- printed in such and such a position ” would be less barbarous than many of the cumbrous periphrases now springing into vogue. M. D. T. C. D. suggests! “rotography” or “ rotography” as a name for the new process of pourtraying the unseen. The proposed term has the advantage that it is easy to pronounce, and implies no theory as to the nature of the process ; indeed, as far as we can see, it is open only to one objection, but that appears to us to be fatal. To place in the hands of the habitual punster sucli a weapon of offence as “rot-ography,” would be to make a serious addition to the minor miseries of life. THE BATTLE OF THE CLUBS. Pendleton Provident Dispensary. The Honorary Secretary of the medical staff of this institu¬ tion is of opinion that justice lias not been done to them in our comments. We may observe that it has never been im¬ plied that “ no reform at all ” has taken place at Pendleton ; it was only suggested that the reform has not been sufficient. Although it is constantly reiterated that this institution “has departed from the rules which govern the Manchester and Salford Provident Dispensaries’Association,” the Pendle¬ ton Provident Dispensary appears still to figure as one of the Branches of that Association, and it appears to be understood that out of its own reserves it supplements the finances of other Branches. So long, therefore, as so intimate a connec¬ tion appears to be maintained between this institution and the Manchester and Salford Dispensary Association, it will be impossible to exonerate the former from all the faults of the latter. If this be a misstatement it has not, so far as we are aware, been publicly contradicted, nor has our correspondent produced any evidence to refute it. If, as a matter of fact, a series of provident dispensaries show profits in proportion to the general prosperity of the population in the district where they are established, that is to say, if where the people are mostly well-to-do they can form a reserve fund but where they are poor the result is a deficit, it can hardly be argued that such a fact is not relevant, as calling in question the efficiency of the wage limit practised at all these Branches. It is stated, also, that the supporters of the Pendleton Branch are derived chiefly from the well-tc-do classes, while its re¬ serve fund (^430 5s.) would appear to be the largest of all the Branches ; so that it is not altogether irrelevant for it to show either that the alleged fact is erroneous, or that it lias no relation to its own material prosperity. April 4, 1896.] PROFESSIONAL SECRECY. matter might be different; but as it is we constantly find has S be V en told^ If tb , e law of the laild to reveaTwhft reasons 0/ dee P est confidence, not for grave reasons of State, but because some blackguard who has tTi? 7 lfe t0 , evn worses chooses to ask g for a divorce sU ch a ^aRrf?e?sof r ?n mS i tanCeS ’ are to admit that for bucn a paltry leason the law can demand that the seal of l\ e ™ C i ^ ha f be -i b /°a ken ’ and if such a demand is to be looked upon and admitted as a “ higher claim,” who can deny the stil higher claim of parental duty. y 6 The fact would seem to be that the law after all has a rnfluencedW 0 ^ 0 ? UbH f opinion, and that public opinion is nttuenced by the view taken by the law. In England then where the law frequently insists on the violation of the sacred¬ ness of professional confidences between doctor and patient such confidencecannot.as in other countries“beLldinvfolate^ other reasons besides the dictum of a judge must be admitted as absolving one from the operation of a rule of o„1£7.S- i0l I "’T of “ s wh0 ciih?f "ot thought much l subject, or have not been awakened by rude experience have been perhaps too apt to look upon as universaRy bfnd- g on every member of the medical profession.—I am etc -March 30th. S C s' a general practitioner of medicine for forty-five yeais, and quite independent of the College of Physicians I have ever fe!t strongly and adhered rigidfyto the “ King duty of medical secrecy.” In medico-legal cases I have thI b y ox de and e fs fb° Pe i nmy m ° uth ,f eithei si de till put into uie dox , and as the lawyers could not know what I should then say they seldom troubled me to go to the court and thus I was enabled to attend to my own business instead of being bored with other people’s and legal quibbles Youn^ piactffmners may be glad of this hint, by 1 which they wilf free to^ook ^ aste ,o f . tlme dangling about the courts, and be am, ttc , k ftei ’ theU ’ patients at home ^th regularity.- I Worthing, March 30th. John J. Merriman. RETAINED PLACENTA, your report of this trial, Sir John Williams is stated to have said : “ In the case of a woman with Sned placenta, he would expect to find frequent and constant bleeding. Her periods would be irregular He would not tlon!” 4 t0 fiUd a penod where there would be no menstrua When I was on the staff at St. Bartholomew’s Hospital a patient came under my charge for sudden and profuse uterine haemorrhage. She had “seen nothing,” she statld since eight months previously, when she had nassprl a ' f,> between the third and fourth month of pregnancy f re moved what I believed to be the entire plaSente wldch had been letained, and remained completely attached till then Its appearance differed widely from that of a fresh placenta and accorded with the changes described by those who o-ave evidence in the trial on Dr. Playfair’s behalf This uncom that fhp 6 ’^ ? eei f S to , me ’ sll0uld be mentioned, as showing that the whole placenta may be retained for as long a period I am S etc m ° nthS ’ CaUSmg arrest of the catamenial function.— Grosvenor street, w., March 3 ist. Clement Godson. [ The British LMedical Journal 873 PROFESSOR VIRCHOW ON MEDICAL EDUCATION. nfpf d