T.xvi-oKs AH(iirrF."el''=d-ach. er_rogh wall—" le beddvn<^" of each " achiler"— vys— scaffalds-seyntrees— flekes-squar-&c. Dr W hitaker no- Tices in his "ami Historv of RichmondshiJe (II. 146.)..another contract in Enghsh, for building a wooden mansion house at Kirklington, dated in 1484, but at this period the English language had g° "^ far to es tablish itself in such transactions as these. He also alludes to a contract dated in 1421, fo^J^"''^''"S ^^'■ terick Bridge, where was a Chapel for the use of travellers, of the ruins «[ ^^ich now removed an en. graving may be found in Grose, but he does not inform us where this valuable record, valuable it must De, is preserved, nor of the language in which it is drawn up. 14. CATTERICK CHURCH. and the nature of the material, may account for the present non-existence of records, which would have been so interesting. A mutilated figure in stone, some years ago removed from a niche or housing on the Tower of Durham Cathedral, holds in its hands a Church carved in the same material, upon a small scale, and of the Norman period. This figure may either represent the Bishop who planned the work, or the mason who carried it into execution. We suspect the latter ; but in either case we have here a proof tiiat our an- cestors practised the art of modelling upon a small scale, the point for which we are contending. Again, what is still more important to our object, there is in Worcester Cathedral, according to Mr. Carter (Ancient Architecture, i., p. 54), in the spandril of an arch, a representation in stone, of an architect presenting the design of a building to a superior personage, who is examining it with attention. We fully agree with Mr. Carter as to the general purport of this valuable memorial, but we differ from him in his explanation ; and we believe it, besides, to contain an important fact, which he has entirely over- looked. The drawing, on tablets, is in the hands of an ecclesiastic, but in- stead of having just received it for his approbation from the builder wlio is sitting near him, we believe liim, after having designed it himself— ^ov we could easily prove that our early architects were, in general, ecclesiastics — to he in the act of proposing it to the builder, as the pattern to be imitated in the contemplated work. At all events, the drawing is on tablets — another proof of oiu- general theory, that wood, or some such material, was pre- ferred to parchment.* To return to Catterick. It is generally supposed, says Dr. Whitaker, " that public works of this nature were executed by companies of Freema- * Since the above was written, it lias come to onr recollection, that there is affixed to the wall over the arch between the nave and chancel of Brancepath Church, in the Connty of Durham, a large wooden tablet, divided into squares, each of which contains an elaborate specimen of the pannelling of the decora- ted period. Can these have been the pattern pieces of an architect y We are strongly inclined to answer in the affirmative. If we are right in our conjecture, here is an important fact in support of onr argument. At all events, such a decoration formed no [lart of the necessary ornaments of Brancepath, or any other Church, at that |)eriod ; and we can only account for it upon the above supposition. CATTERICK CHURCH. 15 sons, wlio travelled from place to place for employment, furnished models, and executed them with a degree of skill far superior to that of country workmen ; but Cracall was a country mason [from Crakehall, Jiear Bedale, as his name implies], and his work bears no marks of inferiority to the work- manship of other Parish Churches." We think it does. His work is " coun- trified," to use the most expressive word which presents itself. We refer more especially to the niches in the choir, and the windows at the west end of the aisles ; and although the execution of the larger windows is in much better character, yet their effect is diminished by a defect in their propor- tions. The great east window, for instance, is too broad for its height. The same remark may be made upon some other parts of the fabric. By the contract, Cracall was at liberty to use the materials of the old Church. That Church was doubtless of a mixed character of Norman (for we know that there was a Church here at the compilation of Doomsday Book) and of early English additions at a later period. An accurate examination of the present fabric will prove that the mason did more than remove entire the window at the east end of the north aisle (not now in existence), to which the contract bound him. The porch-arch must have belonged to the old fabric. The capitals of the piers, too, appear either to have been removed from the same place, or to be rude copies of the early English capitals which were found there. We now come to the conditions of work and remuneration. The contractor binds himself to pull down and remove the stone-work of the old Church, after the timber is taken off (the timber was reserved and bargained for, we doubt not, in a subsequent contract with a carpenter for the roof), the old stone-work is given up to his use — he quarries such new stone as is required, he digs the foundations of the new Church, and he builds it after a certain plan, entering into a bond to finish it in Httle more than three years. Tlie Burghs on their part give the stone of the old Church, they lead such new 16 CATTERICK CHURCH. stone as is necessary, they find lime, sand, water, scaftblding, centres (the two last they reserve, after the finishing of the work, to facilitate perhaps the put- ting on of the roof) and they give in money I70 marks, and a gown wortli about one mark more,* amounting to a€l 14. At that period, as we know from the Cloister Rolls at Durham, the average wages of a mason was 7d., a carpen- ter 5d., and a quarryman 3|d. per day. A mason now receives for one day's work the then wages for a week. So that we come at once to something like a satisfactory conclusion that Cracall's ^^114. is worth at least ^(384. of our present money. But, besides this, he had other great advantages. A full third of the stone was ready chiseled to his hands, andmany of its ornamental parts were in so perfect a state as to admit of being re-used without altera- tion. His lime, sand, water, scaffolds, centres, and leading cost him literally nothing. We must not forget to state that the two aisles are now longer by one arch each than those which he undertook to build, and that the Vestry, the Tower, and the Porch do not enter into his contract. When all these important matters are taken into consideration, it will, we suspect, be found that Cracall was amply paid for his workmanship, however small the above sum may at present appear. It only remains to give a brief notice of our Plates, and their application to the Contract. The Frontispiece exhibits a south-east view of the Church. In the Church-yard, beneath the east window, is an altar tomb, bearing inscriptions, which are worthy of being recorded : — l^rrr lirtl) ttorirU tijr bolsic of IDabtH Hatie, tftr ltingr'0 Ma'tic^ first i)o0tmat<9trr of ^attnirftr, U)l)o arp'trii to tftr iMarrtr of ffioO ttjc uti fiayr of IHapf, 3l.D*i 1610, U)l)09r solnlr E ijopr Sortf) rret m peace. Here also lyeth the Body of David Batie his sonne, who after succeeded him in his office of Postmaster, and dyed Aug. the Anno Domino (ita) 1631, jctatis 53, being 'ZH years in tlie office. * The gown given annually to the master mason of Durham Cloister, which was in building at the very period of this contract, was valued at lys. 4d. CATTERICK CHURCH. 17 ^Iat( 5. A ground plan of the Church, with admeasurements, proving how far Cracall Isdhered to or departed from his Contract. A. Monumental niches in the north wall, v. pi. ix., the work of a later period. B. Our Lady's Porch, which constituted the original termination of the north aisle, as it was left by Cracall, in the east end of which was placed the window re- moved from the old Church, but displaced when C, St. James's Porch, was built by William Burgh and Richard Swaledale* in 1491, and endowed as a Chantry. D is a similar addition, made after the time of Cracall, but lighted by his windows ; the one, of two lights, origi- nally constituting the third window of his chancel, and the other, of three, advanced eastwards from the end of his aisle. We have now a definite notion of Cracall's plan. The tower, the south porch, the portions lettered C and D, the arches which open into them from the choir, and the vestry, are all of later date. B and C are unoccupied by pews, and are the burial places of the Burghs and Lawsons. But see Plates xi. and xii. Wooden screen work of good charac- ter has enclosed B, our Lady's Potch, on the west and south : portions of it still remain. The old stalls, removed from the former Church, still remain in the choir : they are very massy, and not much ornaniented.-f- fJlati: IE. East elevation. Cracall's east window is in the state in which he left it. The window at the end of the south aisle is his, but it has been advanced eastwards. The porch the tower, the east end of the north aisle, and the vestry, are later work. ISIStf^ m. Here, with the exception of the tower and porch, the whole is Cracall's work- manship ; only, as we have above stated, his aisle has been elongated, and his chancel shortened ; * On a brass plate in the middle aisle is the following inscription : — Here lteth John Swaldell, GRANDCHILDE TO RiCHARD SwALDELL, WHOSE PREDECESSORS BVVLT HALFE THE SINGINGE QVVER W™IN THIS Chvrche, who died the seconde of Marche, Anno Domini 1630. " The singing Qvyer" — what an in- terpretation of the word Chantry ! f It forms no part of our plan to notice the various monuments in the Church unconnected with the families of Burgh or Lawson. The two following, however, have a particular claim upon our attention: — A tablet, affixed to the north wall of the chancel, commemorates the author of" Drunken Barnaby," &c., Richard Braithwaite, of Burnside, In Westmorland, Esq., for particulars of whom we must content our- selves with referring to Hazlewood. Braithwaite's first wife was a Lawson, of Nesham Abbey. He mar- ried secondly Mary, daughter of Roger Crofts, of East Appleton, in this parish. + Juxta sitce sunt Ricardi Brathwait, WestmorlandicE, armigeri, et Marise ejus conjugis reliquiae. Die quarto die Mail, anno 1673, denatus est ; haec undecimo Aprilis 1681, suprenmm diem obiit. Horum filius unicus Strafford Brathwait eques auratus adversus Maiiros Christiani nominis hostes infestissimos fortiter dimicans occubuit. Cujus cineres Tingi in Mauritania Tingitana humantur. Requiescant in pace. Arms — Brathwaite, gules, on a chevron arg. three cross croslets fitche sable, impaling Croft, lozengy or and sable.— See Green's Guide to the Lakes, i., p. 138, for some curious anecdotes of Braithwaite, who w as called in Westmorland " Dapper Dick." Beneath a blue slab in the chapel D, is buried " The body of Dame Alice, daughter of Sir Hewit Os- borne, sister of Sir Edward Osborne, of Kiveton, Bart, (aunt to the Most Noble Lord, Thomas, Duke of Leeds), relict of the Rt. Hon. Christopher Wandesford, Esq., of Kirklington, Lord Deputy of Ireland. She died, aged 67 years, 11 months, and 6 days, 10 Dec, 1659." For an account of a most extraordinary ilrcam which this lady had in 1639, see Whitaker's Richm., ii., 161. Notices of the paintings and inscriptions in the windows, when in their perfect state, may be found in SVhitaker. 18 CATTERICK CHURCH. the two windows of the work disturbed being preserved. The clear-story* windows are some- what singular, in standing neither over the centre of the arches of the aisles nor their piers-— an arrangement not uncommoB in early English Churches ; but, then, they are of one light only, a thing very unusual in perpendicular work. ^lAtC HV^ Elevation on the north, in which Cracall's work will be easily distinguished from those of a later date, the elongation of the north aisle, the insertion of a window in the clear-story, and the tower. Of the tower we need say no more, than that probably it was built soon after Cracall's time, by the same mason who seems to have elongated the south aisle and to have built the vestry. The great west window of the tower, the object of which was, in times of old, to throw the full light of declining day upon a devout congregation, is of a good perpendi- cular character. A window has been judiciously placed in the north aisle by the present incum- bent, after Cracall's plan. I^liltf 1:7 » No explanation is here requisite. « ^Itltt T7E, Tlie three stalls or presbyteries (we would gladly establish this word), called in the contract prismatories — a word which, as it is without meaning, is evidently a mistake. The canopies of these seats evince more strongly than any other part of the Church the humble skill of Cracall in ornamental carving ; but, perhaps, they have suffered from the injudicious chisel of a later period. Of the two lavatories one only is pierced. l^liltr TJIE. The door and doorway opening from the south porch into the aisle, both of which appear to have belonged to the old Church. The porch itself, which is of later date, contains a holy water stoup, and over its entrance are three shields in stone — Old Richmond, a cross flory ; Burgh, on a saltire five swans ; and Ashe, three bars. ijJiAtf "FSEE. The monument (with details) of Sir Walter Urswick, who occurs as Chief Forester of the New Forest,f Constable of Richmond Castle in 1371, and to whom John of * In addition to our remarks on this word, p. 8, we have to state, that in the contract for building the Collepate Church of Fotheringay, dated in 1434, the upper stage of the tower is called the " Clerstory," another proof of the real meaning of the word. f An immense tract of wild uninclosed moor-land, stretching from the northern bank of the Swale, a mile or two above Richmond, by Barninghara and Bowes, and Stainmore, to the Tees ; and extending west- wards, through Arkengarthdale, to the boundaries of Richmondshire in that direction. Here, in days of peace, at the appointed time and place, the population of the district met to hunt the wolf, the wild boar, and the stag, in the suite of their Lord. Foxes and hares might be roused from their hiding places dur- ing the chase, but " such small deer" were unheeded by the Earl and his hounds. They followed nobler game, and tancy can picture to itself the stirring of a wolf from his cave within the old British hold be- neath Applcgarth rock, and the echoing of hound and horn, mingled with the mixed cries of assembled hundreds, for many a long mile, until he was fairly hunted down within the ruined briar-clad walls of Maiden Castle upon Stainmore. Ovington upon Tees, antiently Wulvyngton, evidently derives its name from the wolves, to which its woods and rocks afi'ordfid a place of security at the time of its receiving \U appellation. CATTERICK CHURCH. 19 Gaunt, Duke of Lancaster and Earl of Richmond, 22nd November, 1367, granted an annuity of forty pounds per annum out of the Manors of Catterick and Forcet for his services at the battle of Navarre, in Spain, and in support of the Knighthood then and there conferred upon him by the donor. The battle of Navarre was fought on the 3rd April preceding, and from the fact that Urswick had previously worn silver spurs, we may presume that he was then a young man. Supposing him to have been 25 in that year, he may, according to the ordinary duration of human life, have survived the building of the aisle in which his monument is placed, and the supposition may, in consequence, not be a correct one, that his tomb was removed hither from the old Church. After all, however, the character of the effigy, with its canopy, (the ele- vation upon which the figure rests is extremely modern, its original and proper place being upon a level with the floor) leads us to conclude that Urswick died soon after 1371, and that his mo- nument and bones were removed into the new fabric. The shields upon the canopy are, 1, Urs- wick. 2, Scroop of Masham. And 3, the former coat impaling the latter, the united bearing of the man and his wife The ornamental details of the effigy, as far as they remain unmutilated, are rich and characteristic. There is an engraving of this monument in a Number of the Gentleman's Magazine, to which we have mislaid the reference ; another, miserably executed, in Clarkson's History of Richmond, 4to., p. 62 ; and a front view of the figure in Dr. Whitaker's Richmond- shire (ii. 42), as a vignette, professing to give details, but neglecting accuracy. The stone out of which the effigy is carved, resembles more closely the stone of Bramham Moor than that of any other quarry in the North Riding with which we are acquainted. The lavatory and image- block, in the left of the plate, point out the termination of Cracall's aisle, before the extension of which we have so often spoken. iSItltf I.V. Two monumental Ogee niches in the north aisle, marked A in the ground plan, Plate I., within the porch of our Lady designated by the letter B, which certainly from their character could not have been removed from the old Church. Beneath them probably were buried those leading members of the Burgh family, who first "gave way to fate" after the building of the Church.' The funeral slabs which covered the graves of the persons whose bones tl;oy " canopy," have been removed into the middle of the aisle. I^latr X. The font, carved and erected not long after the date of Cracall's contract. Around the upper part of the basin, upon shields, are, first, the initials W. B. (William Burgh) with the arms of Burgh, argent upon a saltire sable, five swans of the field, between them. 4. Fitzhugh of Ravenswath,* azure, a chief and three che\Tonells interlaced in base, or. 5. Scroop of Masham, azure, upon a bend, or, a label of three points, argent. 6. a chief and staff ragule in pale.f 7. Lascelles, argent, three roses gules, and 8, Neville, gules, a saltire ar- * There was some reason for placing the arms of Fitzhugh next after those of the giver of the basin. Henry Lord Fitzhugh of Ravenswath, by deed, dated in 138;), appointed John de Burgh, the father of William the Contractor, Steward of all the lands in Richmondshire, which he farmed of the Queen. f We are unacquainted with this bearing. The shield of Sir Wm. Bcrdwell, in one of Fowler's splen- did volumes of painted glass, somewhat resembles it. The above shields have been lately coloured. so CATTERICK CHURCH. gent. The shaft contains the old French words flar fOJt, ckar or bright fountain, and upon the base are the initials of three persons, perhaps Churchwardens, whose names have been long forgotten. G. L— , W. F— , C. R — l^lAtC Xi.- Monumental brasses in the north aisle, of William Burgh the Contractor, who died in 1442, and of William Burgh, his son and heir, who died in 1462. Of the four shields upon this stone, two only remain. Burgh, argent on a saltire sable, five swans of the field quarter- ing, argent a fess, engrailed between six fleurs de lis sable — a bearing ascribed to Richmond. Catherine Lady Lawson was buried beneath this stone in 1824. IJlAt^ 3^^t^I. Monumental brasses in the same aisle of William Burgh, the founder of the ('hantry of St. James, who died in 1492, and of Elizabeth his wife. The armorial bearings upon this stone have been removed. A brass plate records John de Burgh, who died in 1412, and Catherine his wife, who was one of the Contractors with Cracall. One shield only remains upon this stone — a plain saltire, intimating a connection with Neville or Clervaux. In addition to the above, the north aisle contains inscriptions upon mural monuments or slabs, commemorative of Sir John Lawson, of Burgh, Bart., ob. 26 Oct., 1698, and Lady Catherine Lawson, his wife, dau. of Sir William Howard, of Naworth Castle, Co. Cumb., Knt., ob. 4 Jul., 1668. The heart of John, their eldest son, (who died at Calais.) Sir Henry Lawson, of Burgh, Bart., ob. 1726, set. 73. Sir John Lawson, Bart., ob. 19 Oct., 1737, act. 53. Sir Henry Lawson, of Brough Hall, Bart., ob. 1 Oct., 1781, act. 69, and Dame Anastasia, his wife, third dau. of Thomas Maire, of Lartington, Esq., ob. 2 Nov., 1764, ret. 54. — (Arms, Lawson alone, impaling 3Iaire.) Sir John Lawson, of Brough Hall, Bart., ob. 1811, cet. 67. Elizabeth Lady Lawson, his wife, second dau. of William Scarisbrick, of Scarisbrick, Co. Lane., Esq., ob. 10 June, 1801, at 52. Anastasia Strickland Standish, their eldest dau., wife of Thomas Strickland Standish, of Standish Hall, Co. Lane, and of Sizerg, Co. Westm., Esq., ob. 22 June, 1807, £et. 38. Anastasia, fourth dau. of John Wright, of Kelvedon, Co. Essex, Esq., (their grand-daughter) ob. 27 Nov., 1794, jet. 3. Catherine Lady Lawson, second wife of Sir Henry Lawson, of Brough Hall, Bart., and sole CATTERICK CHURCH. 21 dau. of Henry Fermor, of Worcester, Esq., ob. 13 Sep., 1824, aet. 54.— (Arms, Lawion alone, impaling argent a fess sable, between three lions' heads erased gules.)* It grieves us to state, that this aisle has received another occupant during the passage of these pages through the press. Sir Henry Lawson, a man of very considerable literary attainments, especially attached to topographical pursuits, and of high honor and integrity, in union with great liberality and simplicity of character, was buried here on the 16th January, 1834, at the age of 84, leaving no issue behind him, nor any male relation upon whom his title can descend. He was the sixth Baronet of his family ; of the early descents of which, an account may be found in North Durham, under Scremerston. * There are numerous hatchments hanging in the aisle. We notice one which we think must contain some departures from the laws of heraldry. Its bearings are 1, Lawson; 2, argent on a fess sable three bezants. Gale and Glover assigns this coat to Burgh, and it may be the true bearing, but, then, we have Burgh again in another coat in the fourth quartering. 3, gules a saltire argent, Neville, we know not wh\ . 4, argent on a saltire sable, five swans proper, Burgh. This was certainly the bearing of the family from the beginning of the fifteenth century ; how happens it that an earlier coat has been crowded into the same hatchment ? (We would here briefly remark that, in this coat in the pedigree our engraver has acted upon a somewhat unusual principle : his swans are geese.} 3, sable a cross flory, or, and C, argent a fess, engrailed between six lily flowers sable, both of them coats assigned to Richmond, and one of which alone could with propriety form a quartering in a funereal hatchment of the family. Dugdale, in 1665, recognized the following as the bearing of Sir John Lawson, the first Baronet of the family : — 1. Lawson, argent a chevron between three martlets, sable. 2. Barry of six, argent and azure, in chief 3 annulets sable, Cramlington. 3. Argent, three swine passant sable, Swinhoe. 4. Argent on a saltire sable, 5 swans of the first. Burgh. 5. Argent a fess engrailed between 6 lily flowers sable, Richmond. 6. Lawson. We have been more particular than necessary, perhaps, in noticing the armorial bearings in this aisle, but we have had a particular eye to our good friend Mr Bentham and his illuminating propensities. May he long live in the full fruition of the most perfect topographical library in the kingdom, collected by himself, with the most persevering care, and illustrated with great judgment and pains by Mr. Douce, under his superintendence. *,* We may be permitted to record here a discovery lately made near Catterick of a Saxon bracelet, of the purest gold and of the most exquisite workmanship, and to refer to the Archajologia iElianii for a further account of so valuable a relic. ilfliigrfr of l^urgt) of f^nrqff. (From Dodsvoorth's MSS. Bodl. Oxon. and Hopkinson's Pedigrees.) Arms, argent, on a saldre sable, five swans of the field. BURGH. lElias de Richmond,==^ William Burgh, = Richard dc Richmond,^ Elizabeth, daughter and heiress, whose issue assumed their maternal name. 1 •John Burgh =*Catuerin«, dau. of Roger Aske, Ob. 10 Jan. 1412, buried in our Lady's Porch in Catterick Church Uving 1413, I Thomas Burgh, Vicar of Catterick, 1399. RICHMOND. I I I Bcitrix Joanna Agnes •William Bt7RGH= •Matilda, dau. of Lascelles oh. 4 Nov. 144-2, j of Sowerby, ob. 12 Nov. 1432. bur. in our Lady's Porch. Christopher Burgh := Anne, dau. of . Clitherow •William Burgh : ob. 31 Dec. 1462 bur. in ourLady's Porch •Helen, dau. of John Pickering, ob. 20 June, 1442 or 3 1 William Burgh* = founder (along with R. Swaldale) of the Cliantryof St. James in CatterickChurch, ob. 17 Aug. 1492, bur. in St. James's Porch •Elizab. d. of Christopher Conyers of Hornby, sur- vived her husband. 3 Richard — Eleanor, 4 Henrv William Burgh = Cecily, dau. of ob. 12 Ap. 1508, Thom.is .Met- hur. in St. James's Porch. I Christopher Burgh calfc of Nappa. Agnes, dau. and coh. of ... Mar- ton of JMarton, in Cleveland. William Hut- Burgh dau. of Bt ton (Picton Henry Hupk.'iKixt. Lord of Calais. .Spenser. quare. Catherinej married ittegiblt. Anne, dau. and coh. married Henry Eure. Elizabeth = Anne Tcmpest= =Sir Thomas Tempest of Holmside, Co. Pal. Sir Ridph Bulmer, Knight. Giles Burgh =Elizab. d. of John Met- calfe, of the Stubbes. I . Elizabeth, dau. and heir, married Tho. Layton of Dal- maine, Co. Cumb. .\nne mar. Francis, -ion and heir of Sir Richard Cholmcley of Roiby,Co. Ebor., Knt. Francis mar. Marmaduke Constable of Cliffe, Co. Ebor. Milicent mar. Tliomas Grey of Bar- ton, Co. Ebor. Anthony Burgh, = Alerchant of the 1 Staple at Calais, | made free 11 H. I 2 John Burgh. 1 Roger Burgh of Burgh =:ElizabetIi, daugh. and coh. by entail male. to the heirs of Roger Chamber of Bur- ton upon Trent, Co. SufT. Elizabetli, dau. and heir, married Sir Ralph Law- son, son of Edmund Law- son of NcB"castle, gent., owner of Burgh in right of his wife, and ancestor of Sir Henry Lawson of Burgh or Browgh Hall, Bart., who died 9th Jan. 1834. In the above Pedigree the names of the Contractors for the building of Catterick Church in 141'2 r^--]y: "^ _^cfc:e3=:*=^^=^?^^E=f1 ■V • ' '* ■ -n- ( ti ^' if i:«e i^ -.Uii u :j -Lt J \^ ^TT=I ^ \ ^ I ^ A, I ^ ■ ^ ^ I ■I V ->s I ?5 t^- -I -f fiat'; VH r4 ,*. }r^t?i>r'^i^^ y^i^ c_vj?^/^ • ._ ^.^f€e> fl,iu r.07-nJ834 'V-*^ .H-"V'I .^ V ^ ."^fcefrs >\ \; J'lateX. n.aft^r :^^ ■HtiTAhnTnuacT films iljeTe^piVill)ill\ Qui ofrntolUn _^\p m1' dtrpbr fti^m §c2£:^lui dcdi^Dror '/^:,/:...-./^1^...J.9 Mono Brasses. JUliiA^ fy John Wade,.m53,SiyhE<:' FltUeXD '^^^sSJ^-i^S^^), I""".- fpuo^ ~^iZ,<^'C(^ '^■da^c/^ Mo?2um&nfal Brasses . /;-/. .59.St^hBolborn,.ldS4- s THE GETTY CENTER LIBRARY :.:y.':^. - ■ :^'^v^^.--i!^^^'^:,^j]^-^,!:j!^