et oe * Bes: SS sy Yo need = pase =, Saran Era : Mae. << eve a = a as > — ee PA Reet es Coe Fase GSE aA. me Self ine question subject fror Luke 18:8 WaS Suggested during a conversation with ‘ip. Horace Le. Day, New York City - as one rarely scrutinized yet containing the query which is the key to all she signs of the times." Mr, Day says: "This book Rat re | | | eres mae pikiee a “y presents tne Divine Sembee Ages, the W nence end Whither te a an cies Sr and should be in une nana of every teacher, preacher and missionary,” Library of The Theological Seminary PRINCETON - NEW JERSEY D7 KE PRESENTED BY M. Paulson - ——E The author has tried to present in small compass a large mass of truth and knowledge that should make a helpful and popular textebook in Christian homes and institutions. He has shown the necessity | and the supply of divine wisdom in the matter of Christian philosophy, including a convincing exhibition of the fallacies of the pseudophilosophies of the day. The book is apologetic, declaring that God can only be known by revelation, and not by science or philosophy (Job 11:7-9; Matte. 16:13-17; Matt. 22:29). Above ali, the author is firm in the faith as to the second coming of Christ, pre millenial and imminent. His visible return for His bride, the Church, made up of all true believers regardless of visible church affiliation. Who will view as "scoffers" these who deride this glorious forecast referred to more than 350 times. It is the key to all prophecy and the highway of the New Testament. So vital is the. knowledge of God's plan for the end of this age that neither education, legisla- tion, nor combination will be found to end the night of sin and sorrow; the darkness will continue "till He come”; then for every child of the day, the Gawn will break and the shadows flee AWAY. (Wed se) Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2022 with funding from Princeton Theological Seminary Library https://archive.org/details/shalljesusfindfa0Oherg SHALL JESUS FIND PAITH ON BKARTH? By Henry J. Herge Published for The Author 611 Tenth Street College Point, N. Y. By Wale NSM. SapANks (SUTURE ON og & NEW YORK CITY a Copvricut, 1924 *BYS, (as Henry J. HEerceE. ul INTRODUCTION Philosophy may be defined as the love of wisdom. It regards wisdom as the principal thing. It is resolved to get wisdom, to get understanding, at all costs, esteeming them above all other riches. Philosophy may also be defined as the fruit of the love of wis- dom, the wisdom gained by a zealous search for it, that mastery of the principles of life and its relationships which furnishes a governing and working scheme of thought in that progression through time which we call living. Philosophy is synthetic. It loves the wisdom that can sum up the fundamental principles of life in one word. It seeks a first cause in all cases. It would merge second causes into a first cause and find one key to all problems. It would find and use talismanic, sententious solution amid the mysteries which sur- round us. This desire for one comprehensive term is the charm of rationalistic and evolutionary philosophy. It is also, and properly, the incentive of the student of theology, that science of God and His universal relationships which furnishes the noblest philosophy, the only true wisdom, the sole and sufficient satis- faction of the philosophic mind. A sound philosophy of life is what Christ referred to when He said, “But one thing is needful,” thus setting forth a faith in Him- self that would work by love as the fundamental principle of right living. It is this answer to the questioning mind of man that is the need and the real demand of our times. Again the world by wisdom has not known God, and again it pleases God to offer it Christ as both the wisdom and the power of God, not only the wisdom, but also the power to fulfil it. The world was never more needy of this wisdom, hidden indeed from the wise and understanding, but revealed unto babes, than at the present time. Perhaps the world was never more deeply, though unconsciously, looking for the coming of Him who is to be “The desire of all nations” when all human wisdom and philosophies 3 + Introductory shall have failed. The wisdom proposed to our first parents as the reward of disobeying God has proved a sorry thing indeed. It knows evil as an experience and good as a theory. But that wisdom which is from above, that is first pure and then obe- dient, knows good by experience and understands evil well enough to avoid it. It has a true philosophy and a fruitful under- standing. The feeling after an unknown God that characterized ancient Athens and its philosophers is, by a charitable interpreta- tion, the secret of the gropings of the modern mind. We sup- pose that still, to paraphrase a saying of Christ’s, many prophets and righteous men desire to see the things which we see, and see them not, we think many are in search of the secret of life’s enigma, may it please the Light of the world to open their eyes. It is the aim of this commendable work on “Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth?” to supply this more or less realized need of our strange and disturbed era. With a learned and thorough re- view of the history of philosophy, with an uncompromising ad- herence to evangelical truth, with fervency of spirit and earn- estness of purpose, Dr. Herge has made a new and valuable con- tribution to the truth of the spiritual character of philosophy. He has brought to the interpretation of philosophy the one element which has been left out, the super-natural element, for want of which all human wisdom is foolishness, and with which all true thinking falls into harmony with a universal divine system. He has revived the perishing idea of a teaching Church and insisted upon the supreme importance of divine revelation. Particularly, he has set forth the wisdom of God as embracing Christ’s dispensational place as King over all the earth, a King- dom of God that will be brought to pass in His righteousness, though not in ours. He has seen that prophetic utterance of Socrates, “We cannot change the moral nature of mankind, we must wait until someone comes,” fulfilled and still to be fulfilled in the coming of Him who has now gone into a far country, to receive for Himself a kingdom AND TO RETURN. Catskill, N. Y. CHRISTOPHER G. HAZARD. PREFATORY DECLARATION Adding to the ever increasing number of books is indeed need- less where there is no claim to originality of conception, novelty of method, or exceptional faculty. The product before us makes no apology in that it is an earnest endeavor to fulfil a solemn vow to be diligent in such studies as help to the knowledge of the truth. There is a larger purpose, and in its development no doubt mistakes here and there appear, but we “lay claim to an honest intention, a temper of obedience, a dread of error, and a desire to serve.” At the outset then let it be understood that the following pages lay claim to originality perhaps in so far as can be said that the matter under discussion has never to our knowledge been similarly treated. From the whole we may learn that the philosophy of the world was caught in an eddy of vast dimensions and “only moved in a circle with way stations along the route, never able to escape from the circular movement of human thought.” For this reason what an awful whirlpool of confusion throughout the ages, with the rise and fall of many systems intended to benefit mankind. What stupendous force based on evolution ready to break for the last time and crash with all that it has built up. It is in apostasy that the philosophy of history reaches a climax. Citing the foremost Christian Apostle, we find that he never con- fused the readjustment of circumstances with the transforma- tion of life as the philosophers have done and are still doing as social reformers. “He saw that when the social crusader had done his uttermost, the overwhelming foe was still alive and rampant. And what is the good of springs of prosperity if some- thing remains which turns man’s sweet waters into bitterest draughts? What is the good of a new Eden if we remain under the tyranny of the old devil? Social progress may multiply our material comforts; it will never give us inward peace.”’ “There is only one way for philosophy to escape from its situa- tion and find the current on the bosom of the river of thought 5 6 Prefatory Declaration which will carry it on to its destination, That current is re- ligious experience wherein man’s upward soaring thought is met by God’s descending revelation and love. When the real cur- rent of thought is once reached, a new day will dawn for philosophy, and ere long the philosophers will see the gleam on the gates of pearl and the sparkle on the jasper walls of the city of God, whither they would find the way.” The author has studied with profound interest much that has been written in opposition to this view, but did not hesitate to avail himself after thorough, prayerful contemplation and judg- ment of any sentiment which commended itself in accordance with the Word of God. How far he is indebted to both nega- tive and positive writers, including every phase of knowledge, is beyond determination. What is intended is the declaration of the immutable truth, which alone can make men free; the separa- tion of the true from the false; leading step by step to the great truth that the real and uplifting understanding of God must be revealed to man; that there is no religion or philosophy ex- cept the Christian, so capable of giving man a substantial hope, and a true and unvarying standard by which to measure his achievement. Included is the fact that knowledge is debt; culture is obli- gation; and that man is not fully alive until he has learned that he does not live by bread alone; that it is the Spirit which quickeneth, the flesh profiting nothing. Thus is seen the suprem- acy of the teachings of Jesus over all others. He who possesses Him as the embodiment of truth is forever free from doubt and uncertainty and must become a channel through whom the life giving waters flow to brighten the lives of others. It is for these reasons that a prayerful yet rigid testing of what follows is solicited, which as a whole will be justified only on the merits of its definiteness of aim and purpose, together with the object in view, determining whether it is worthy to be re- ceived, and how it is to be judged. If it is found as believed, in conformity with the knowledge, plan and purpose of an all — Prefatory Declaration / wise, loving God and Father, as opposed to “the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive’; then our humble service will not be in vain, nor shall His Word return unto Him void. No greater purpose or reward on our part can be desired than that ‘“‘the Way, the Truth, and the Life” be revealed in clearer light descending from the cardinal prin- ciple of all light, goodness and love; Jesus Christ our Lord, Saviour and Hope of Glory. The writer is indebted and most grateful to the Rev. Christo- pher G. Hazard, D.D., of Catskill, N. Y., for his admirable in- troduction; to the Rev. Prof. Fredrick Mueller, of Albany, N. Y., for his encouraging and commending recension; to the Rev. Arthur J. Smith, D.D., of Kew Gardens, N. Y., for his ex- ceptional critique, valuable suggestions and support; to Mrs. J. Finley Shepard, of New York City and the First Reformed Church of College Point, N. Y., for generous beneficence; and MosteotvalletoeNlr. Eloraccslamivay cor Newry ork: City, for his fraternal interest and indefatigible labors; all of whom, seeing the possibility of this work, for the furtherance of the truth, helped send it on its way in the hope of touching many lives. lake dak REFERENCES History of Religions, Allan Menzies, D.D., (Scribners). Religions of Primitive Peoples, (Putnam). Science and the Bible, Morris, (Ziegler & McCurdy). What the World Believes, Hager, (Gay Bros. ). Works of Cor. Tacitus, Murphy, (Thos. Wardle). Chips from a Workshop, Max Mueller, 4 vols. History of Religion, E. Renan. Beyond Good and Evil, Nietzsche. Necessity of Revelation, Campbell. Moral Uses of Dark Things, Bushnell. Odyssey and Iliad, Homer. Descent of Man, Darwin. Tropical Nature and Other Essays, Wallace. Prehistoric Man, Lubbock. Hibbert Lectures, Sayce. Greek and Roman Antiquities, Anthon. Connection and Principles of Natural and Revealed Religion. Sykes. Jewish Encyclopedia. Greek and Roman Mythology, J. M. Tatlock, (Century Co.). History of Philosophy, C. J. Webb, (H. Holt Co.). Psychology of Religion, Starbuck, (Scribners). Christianity and Science, Peabody, (Carter). Varieties of Religious Experience, Prof. Wm. James, (Long. Green; ‘Ca. ). Psychology of Religious Belief, Pratt, (Macmillan). The Meaning of History, Harrison, (Macmillan). Ancient History, Myers, (Ginn & Co.). Psychology of Politics and History, Mathews, (Harv. Univ. Press. ). Scripture in Light Modern Disc. and Knowl., Geike, (Hurst). Channing’s Works, (Am. Unitarian Assoc.). 8 References 9 The Old Testament in the Jewish Church, W. R. Smith, (Ap- pleton). Land of Israel, Stewart. Studies of Great Subjects, Frude. Curiosities of Literature, I. D’Israeli. Constitution of Man, George Combe. Thomas Chalmers’ Works. Christianity and the Social Crisis, Rauschenbusch, (Scribners). Plain Papers on Prophetic Subjects, Trotter. Social Elements, Henderson, (Scribners). History of Decline and Fall Roman Empire, 8 vols., Gibbon. Christianizing the Social Order, Rauschenbusch, (Scribners). History of Modern Europe, 5 vols., Russell. Social Idealism and the Changing Theology, G. B. Smith, (Mac- millan). History of Ancient Philosophy, Windleband, (Scribners). Pope’s Works, Warburton, (Bascom). The Problem of Human Life, Euken, (Scribners). The Sociology of the Bible, Schenck, (Board Pub. R. C. A.). Social Principles of Jesus, Rauschenbusch, (Assoc. Press). Socialism and Character, Vida D. Scudder, (Houghton, Mifflin Or): Christ’s Social Remedies, Montgomery, (Putnam). Studies in Evolution of Industrial Society, Ely, (Chautauqua Press). Prof. Rauschenbusch’s Christ, and Social Crisis, Haldeman, (Cook). Christ in the Social Order, Clow, (Hodder Stoughton Co.). CONTENTS SHALL JESUS FIND FAITH ON EARTH? 1. ACCORDING TO THE HISTORY OF RELIGION; or, THE RELIGION OF PRIMITIVE CREDULITY, a) The permanent and universal foundations of primitive religious belief; reasons for similarity of religious be- lief in all primitive peoples. The ever present principles of religion as a psychic phenomenon. (pages, 17—25. b) The power of words; potency of the curse; sacred names; the ceremonial law; divination and prediction. (pages, 26—29. c) Primitive religion as expressed in the Rite. Earliest species of sacrifice; real end to be achieved by sacrifice. (pages, 30—34. : d) Heathen or pagan religion as a means of social better- ment. The family. Advance of positive knowledge; primitive practice of art. (pages, 35—39. e) Did primitive religion exert an improving influence on the life of the individual? Vindication of revealed re- ligion. (pages, 40—47. SHALL JESUS FIND, BATT ON hatin 2, ACCORDING .TO \ANGIENT,) PHIVOSOPH Ye eee. SCHOOLS OF GREECE, THETR INBDUEN Crary AND NOW. A comparison of the ethical principles as de- veloped by the philosophers of Greece (Thales to Aristotle), with those taught by our Master and His immediate followers. (pages, 48—5I. a) Discussion of the development of Pagan Philosophy prior to the birth of Jesus; influence of its votaries; the various schools, what they stood for. Character of each Io Contents 11 oft the great’ leaders of thought in ancient Athens. (pages, 52—79. b) Can the divine purpose be recognized in the intellectual awakening that preceded the appearance of our Saviour? (pages, 80—86. le ale) Ps Goa OUIN ON Teele ONAN RSET sa pee eC OR DING LOSCH EPS YCHOLOGY OL REMIGION ; Pee Ni oY CH COC GAAS ERGs OM REETGIOUS Peele NG EH a) Nature and elements of the psychic life; importance of our instinctive life; nature of religious belief. (pages, QI—103. b) The emotions in religious life; emotional progression as revealed by the yielding of fear and awe to reverence, admiration, gratitude and tenderness. (pages, 104—113. c) Suggestibility. Theory of hypnotic phenomenon; nor- mal and abnormal suggestibility. Difference between re- vivals of the past and revival meetings of today. (pages, [14—123. d) Educational means of creating stability in (a) the in- dividual; (b) society. (pages, 124—1I3I. Sit Vien eo Wom Ome ED OND MART ie pee CCORDING TO SOCIAL SCIENCE: or, SOME, SO- ie wee ROB WES ORS THES PRESENT DAY. ofA ystudy of social questions as presented in cities of 5000 or more in- habitants, from the viewpoint of the Christian. a) A comprehensive definition of society. (pages, 14—147. b) Nature’s teaching. (pages, 148—155. c) The family, its importance to the State; it sometimes seems that this subject is not receiving the attention it 12 Contents should. The mad pursuit of wealth and pleasure in too many instances seems to have dulled the senses to all that is sacred in the home life. (pages, 156—164. d) The education that is worth while; will not the ideal cur- riculum embrace something more than a knowledge of literature, the sciences, or mere technical skill? (pages, 165—172. e) The Church, its mission. Does this, the greatest moral force of the present age, recognize fully its responsibility as a factor in the every day life of the community? (pages, 173—183. SHALL: JESUS FINDSEATITs@ Neier ieee 5, ACCORDING TO; THE PHILOSOPEY OFS i etna. or, HISTORY PHILOSOPHIGALLEY CONSIDEREL: a) What is the message of the ages to the nations of the present era? (pages, 188—200. b) Are the leading governments of the present time in- terpreting the message intelligently, or are they driving blindly toward the rocks on which so many ships of State have foundered in the past? (pages, 201—209. c) The Christian Philosophy in history; force exerted at the present time. Conclusion. (pages, 210—226. SHALL JESUS FIND FAITH ON EARTH? [. ACCORDING TO THE HISTORY OF RELIGION; or, THE RELIGION OF PRIMITIVE CREDULITY CHAPTER I. On the battlefield of Europe, over and above military impe- rialism and commercial jealousy, two great spiritual forces wrestled for supremacy; the philosophy of Jesus the Christ and the philosophy of Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, even as they were struggling in the minds of the brilliant thinkers of the world long before the conflagration burst forth. Nietzsche saw the universe only as a great chemical laboratory ; a world of atomic activity. Human destiny, character, conduct, he interpreted only in relations corresponding to the “action of nitric acid on oxide of nitrogen.” All individual happiness, all higher values and spiritual aspirations resolved themselves into atomic activity. Christianity in his estimation was infinitely inferior to the pagan religions. He claimed that the doctrines of the Prince of Peace were destructive to the principles of Teutonic supremacy. Instead of ““Blessed are the meek,’ Nietzsche’s beatitudes blessed only the “valiant, for they shall be called, not the children of Jehova, but the children of Odin and Thor, who were immeasur- ably greater.” In his “Beyond Good and Evil,” sect. 259, he condemns Chris- tianity as the greatest of all possible corruptions. “It has left,” he says, “nothing untouched by its depravity. It combats all good, red blood, all hope and life. It is the one immoral shame and blemish upon the human race. It is both unreasonable and degrading. It is the most dangerous system of slave morality the world has ever known. It has waged a deadly war on the 13 14 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? highest type of man. It has put a ban on all that is healthy in man.” Imperialism has again met its Waterloo, but is not completely vanquished, as the philosophy of history will prove. Just so the hydra headed evil spirit of this world’s false science and phil- osophy, though wounded for a time, will reappear to combat with truth and revelation, when at last it will be fully annihilated. Much research has proven that Nietzschian reasoning is gen- erally maintained by specialists so-called in Ethnology, Ethnog- raphy and the study of Comparative Religions, who begin their reasoning with the premises of evolution, reaching perhaps a sort of ethical climax in the teachings of Jesus, but making no distinction between the ethnic and the revealed religions; and therefore, as in all subjective reasoning, the result is chaotic. Truth once again places such specialists in a class by them- selves, whose destructive criticism, if embraced by the masses, the burden bearers of the world, would involve a deluge of blood, revolution and destruction, rivaling in terror anything the world has ever seen. Let man’s desires be dragged downward, and he will follow them to destruction. Far be it from the Christian scholar to give the impression that the ethnic religions must be approached from the angle of hostil- ity. If this impression is evident in what is to follow, let it be understood that such a course is not intended, allowing only facts to speak for themselves, wherein we would be fair and commend all things good and beautiful. Many things excite our admiration in the upward reach of the human mind, in spite of insurmountable difficulties seeking after the Unseen, if hap- pily it may find Him. Only as man’s goal is lifted far into the upper altitudes is he upborne to higher planes of thought, conduct and aspira- tion. Instead of Darwinian “Gemmules,”’ Spencerian “Vitalized Molecules,’ and Nietzschian “Atoms,” may we ever be found standing on the world old foundation fact that man was made in the image of God, his ideas, though finite, akin to the Divine; Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 15 that in his original constitution, as the design of his Creator, he was formed a religious creature. _In this man is alone, able to ascertain the idea of God, to be- lieve in Him; to strive to become like Him, to worship Him as God. This inward light, this consciousness of God, the sense of the existence of a Being supreme, absolute, with whom men have to do, and the light of reason which tells them of good and evil, the apostle speaks of when he says, (Rom. 1:32), “They knew the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death.” Thus also man stands alone, constituted to recognize the light without, the light of nature, which most eloquently certifies to him of the Maker’s eternal power and Godhead, with a growing conception of the unity of nature, taught of the one mind, the one intelligence, the one builder and architect of it all. It is reasonable to suppose then, and even confirmed by the most ancient accounts, that the knowledge of religion was com- municated to the first parents of the human race by a revelation from God, and from them handed down to their descendants. Having therefore primarily to deal with natural religion, we find it to be the science of God as drawn from nature, including not only the outer world, but man himself, with his conscience and other powers. Ethnologists of the modern school deny any such distinction, and look upon all religions alike as more or less enlightened expressions of mental traits common to all man- kind in every known age. Religion, according to scientific methods, they claim, con- cedes the exclusive possession of truth to none. And then, while ignoring the fact of revelation, they courteously claim that the science of Ethnology neither attacks nor defends the beliefs which it studies, that it confines itself to examining their charac- ter and influence alone by the lights of reason and history. Then rather call it the science of deluded fancy or detestable im- posture, for science as science knows nothing of God, revelation 16 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? or immortality; and, ignoring these facts and laws of the spir- itual realm, no wonder the theory of evolution is misleading. Disregarding this position altogether, we find that the notion of one supreme God was never entirely extinguished in the Pagan world; yet His true worship was in great measure lost and confounded amid a multiplicity of idol deities. In reference to the depravity of man’s nature, Pascal once said, “It is of dangerous consequence to present to man how near he is to the level of beasts, without showing him at the same time his great- ness. It is likewise dangerous to let him see his greatness with- out his meanness. It is more dangerous yet to leave him ignorant of either; but very beneficial that he should be made sensible of both.” Man’s greatness can only be developed through the grace of God. Without this knowledge as revealed in “The Sacrifice once for All” man is hopelessly depraved in sin and utterly lost. It is this wilful disposition on the part of man, of naturalism as opposed to revelation, that caused God to speak thus through His prophet: “I have nourished and brought up children, and they have rebelled against me. The ox knoweth his owner, and the ass his master’s crib: but Israel doth not know, my people doth not consider. Ah sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, a seed of evildoers, children that are corrupters: they have for- saken the Lord, they have provoked the Holy One unto anger, they are gone away backward.” (Isa. 1:2-4). These facts are clearly evidenced in the study of the religions of primitive credu- lity. CHAPTER II. 1) THE PERMANENT AND UNIVERSAL FOUNDA- TIONS OF PRIMITIVE RELIGIOUS BELIEF. The main de- parture from worshipping the true God is first seen in the deifica- tion of the heavenly bodies, perhaps in Egypt, which naturally be- came the highest and most reasonable conception of the eternal and first principle of the universe, and where God became the “Unknown.” According to Diodorus Siculus, the Egyptians began with the worship of the sun and moon, and thence proceeded to worship the elements, the earth, water, fire, and air; and at last came to worship animals and reptiles. Thus idolatry increased among them. The abuse of the hieroglyphical characters and sacred symbols, which were in early use in Egypt, contributed not a little. Under pretense of superior wisdom, the purity and sim- plicity of the ancient religion became more and more corrupted. Similarly the Phoenicians, Assyrians and Chaldeans reverenced the sun and moon and stars. Here began the study of astronomy, from which developed astrology, a pseudo science. Speculating on the heavenly bodies they looked upon them as animated be- ings, which view later even the learned Rabbi Maimonides held, asserting that the celestial orbs were intelligent and. rational animals, which worship, praise and celebrate their Creator and Lord; and he represented many Jewish doctors of the same opinion. Philo Biblius, the translator of Phoenician history, claimed that the Phoenicians accounted the sun to be the only Lord of Heaven. Also the patriarch Job, (31:26-28), refers to this practice in Arabia, regarding it as a denial of the living God. The Persians very early worshipped the heavenly bodies, long before Abraham appeared on the stage of history. This then became a universal practice, especially during the period of the Law Giver Moses, in Israel, for we find him de- nouncing it in his writings. The Greeks worshipped the heaven- ly bodies, but as they advanced in culture, other deities were added, culminating in a system of mythology stupendous in 17 18 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? outline and filled with corrupt practices. Cicero, speaking for the Romans, said, “Behold this resplendent height,’ meaning the blue vault of heaven, “which all men invoke as Jove. Thou seest the high immeasurable expanse of ether which encompas- seth the earth in its tender embrace; this regard as the chief of gods, celebrate this as Jupiter.’ (De Natura Deorum, cap. 2 et25 In the Pythagorean sense, ether was held to be animated and the cause of the formation and order of things, and universal- ly diffused, of which the souls of men were supposed to be particles. The Orphic Verses describe the sun as “having an eternal eye of righteousness, that seeth all things and is the light of life.’ (Campbell’s Nec. of Rev., p. 185-186). The Hebrews were familiar with this type of idolatrous wor- ship during their captivity in Egypt, both from the contiguity of On, the chief seat of the worship of the sun, as implied in the name itself, “House of the Sun,” and also from the connection between Joseph and Potipherah, “he who belongs to Ra’ the priest of On. (Gen. 41:45). Later in idolatry the Hebrews themselves worshipped the sun in the form of Baal of the Phoenicians; at another time the Molech or Milcom of the Am- monites; and then the Hadad of the Syrians. The sun-god was the supreme male divinity of the ancients. Even the name Baal itself signifies lord or master. From the Jewish Encyclopedia, (vol. 2, p. 379), we learn that “the ques- tion as to the origin of the worship of Baal among the Hebrews can only be settled by tracing it among the Semites in general and especially among the Babylonians. Here the name (Bel) is that of one of the earliest and most honored of national deities. Bel was the special god of Nippur, perhaps the oldest of Baby- lonian cities. Nippur was in the earliest known times a religious center, and the prestige of Bel was so great that when the city of Babylon became supreme, his name was imposed upon that of Merodach, the patron deity of the capitol, who was thenceforth known as Bel-Merodach, or simply Bel. It would appear that Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 19 the Hebrews first learned Baal-Worship from the agricultural Canaanites. Apart from the offerings of fruits from the earth and the firstlings of cattle, much is not known with regard to the rites of the popular Baal-Worship.” From other sources, such as Frude in his “Great Subjects,” p. 273, we find that “Baal rose in his sun-chariot in the morning, scattered the evil spirits of the night, lightened the heart, quickened the seed in the soil, clothed the hill-side with waving corn, made the gardens bright with flowers, and loaded the vine- yard with purple clusters. When Baal turned away his face, the earth languished, and dressed herself in her winter mourn- ing robe. Baal was:the friend who held at bay the enemies of mankind, cold, nakedness and hunger; who was kind alike to the evil and the good, to those who worshipped him and those who forgot their benefactor.” Though ethnologists generally doubt that the Great-Nature Power Worship came first, yet it appears reasonable from the facts adduced. It is afterward that it became broken into poly- theistic fragments, wherein we find the tribal and later the na- tional heroes memorialized and idolized. Bushnell in his “Moral Uses of Dark Things,” p. 96, says, “If we speak of temples and monuments, the stones of the Incas re- main, but the Titans that piled them, are gone.’ Mythology seems to apply the name ‘Titan’ to any one of the children of Uranus and Gaea. They are said to have had six sons and six daughters. This very ancient family of giants became the authors and objects of Grecian worship, originally living in Phoenicia, and then emigrating into Greece. It is claimed that Egypt laid the foundation of Greek myth- ology, but as the names of the Titan family are Phoenician, it is likely that Greece, as well as Egypt, owed its mythology to Phoenicia, and very marked is the similarity between the three. These systems abound in the worship of this deified family. Their adventures, knowledge of the arts and inventions, with which they inspired the people wherever they wandered, created 20 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? a religious admiration for them while in the mortal body. They were regarded as the incarnation of natural forces. ‘Thus the worship of the luminaries and the vault of heaven was early transferred to these gods and godesses, the individual members of the Titan family. Then, incited to rebellion by the mother, Gaea, the children dethroned the father, Uranus, and enthroned their brother Kronos, who again was replaced by his son Zeus. Hence there arose the fiction of mighty, noble and ofttimes very mean deeds, so graphically presented in the heroes of Homer’s Odyssey and the Iliad. And as Egypt and Greece early adopted the mythology which originated with Phoenicia, so Rome inherited the myths and worship of a conquered people. Tertullian upbraided the Ro- mans, that notwithstanding their high regard for their ancestry, they had fallen from those of their institutions. They restored the mysteries of Bacchus, which by a decree of the senate had been exterminated out of Rome and all Italy. The Egyptian deities, particularly Serapis, Isis, Harpocrates, Cynocephalus, or Anubis, which had been expelled from the Capitol by the con- suls, and their altars overturned, were again admitted. So far is it from being true that the Romans grew in the knowledge of re- ligion, of the true God, as they grew in literature, that on the contrary they were still more immersed in idolatry and polythe- ism. Rome became at length the receptacle of all kinds of idolatry. Therefore, disregarding all these developments in: the Minor Nature Deities, it remains clear that the permanent and universal foundations of all primitive beliefs are to be found in the Great- Nature Power Worship. (a) THE SIMILARITY OF RELIGIOUS (BEUI iia ALL PRIMITIVE PEOPLES, evident from the previous argu- ment, now requires a reason. Man is a religious being because he is so constituted. This fact with every race of men establishes a firm opposition to Mr. Charles Darwin’s “Descent of Man,” (1871), which startled the world by maintaining that ‘man Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? an developed by slow and almost imperceptible stages from lower . animals.” Mr. A. R. Wallace, one of the foremost naturalists, the most eminent supporter of some of Mr. Darwin’s views, says in his “Tropical Nature and Other Essays,” p. 286, “It is a curious cir- cumstance that, notwithstanding the attention that has been directed to the subject in every part of the world, and the nu- merous excavations connected with railways and mines, which have offered such facilities for geological discoveries, no advance whatever has been made for a considerable number of years in detecting the time or mode of man’s origin. The Paleolithic (old rough) flint implements, first discovered in the north of France are still the oldest undisputed proofs of man’s existence; and, amid the countless relics of a former world that have been brought to light, no evidence of any one of the links that must have connected man with the lower animals has yet appeared.” “The doctrine of the transformation of species,” says Heer, (vol. 2. pp. 282, 291), “is most decidedly contradicted by facts. Not only has no new species originated during the period of hu- man history, but even the lignites (woody coal), which go back to a much earlier time, exhibit the existing flora. The present Swiss Alpine plants are the descendants of the Alpine drift flora, but, though living under different physical conditions, it is impossible to distinguish those of the present day from plants of the drift flora of Iceland and Greenland.” “Tt is the same with marine animals,” continues Dr. Heer: “no new species has had its origin since the drift period. Nor is this peculiar to the drift. The same facts are true of preceding geolog- ical periods. The same species maintain their existence through long cycles, and often, in all parts of the globe, present precise- ly the same characteristics. The formation immediately follow- ing any earlier period, and belonging to a new epoch, may con- tain some species inherited from the preceding period, but the greater part of the species show us a new type, and present 22 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? distinct characteristics. There are no forms which would in- dicate a fusion of species.” : Sir J. Lubbock in his “Prehistoric Man,” firmly coincides with Prof. Max Mueller in his “Chips from a Workshop,” (vol. 4, p. 458), declaring that “man alone employs language; he alone comprehends himself; he alone has the power of abstraction; he alone possesses general ideas; he alone believes in God.” What a clashing of opinions among the scientists, and yet what concessions. When they agree to disagree, the choice of opinion is left to lay observation. Naturally then, as we trace man carefully and weigh the evidences, we find some pure tradi- tions and rays of some primeval light. These rays are visible and cannot be denied, as seen among other things, marvelous to be- hold, in the Egyptian civilization perhaps more than five thou- sand years ago, which produced an architecture which cannot be duplicated even today. That architecture, embodied all their ideas of religion, science, art, literature and philosophy. Possessing therefore a mere in- stinct for the worship of perhaps only an “Unknown God,” in whatever form, it is reasonable to suppose that man, though fal- len in Adam, because of disobedience toward a righteous God, was created a religious being, and, in an adult stage, so far pos- sessing faculties of attaining to religious worship by reflection and proper instruction, as to evidence in his constitution a capac- ity above that of the beasts of the field. It follows then that there could be no greater absurdity than to suppose beings with reason and intelligence to have evolved from a blind and unintelligent cause. But the main features of his constitution which present the reasons for a similarity of belief in all primitive peoples are to be found especially in his aspirations, conscience, wants, and experience. The human race has always conceived of some existence more exalted than man, because of unwillingness to shut itself up within its own limits, aspiring after intercourse with some divinity, craving to ally its destiny with a supreme power. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 23 Depravity affecting all mankind, and conscience asserting it- self, as a last resort, some sort of religion was necessary to satis- fy the craving for the “lost Word,” and though falling back on mere “atoms and forces” which substituted God, they neverthe- less in their blindness desired some ennobling influence, seeking it either in the vastness of the universe, in humanity, among animals or in the mineral kingdom. The wants of man then proved the need of an existing God. He needed help, comfort and providence, which only such a God could supply; while his experience, brought forth the need of a Saviour, or at least an intercessor, as seen in the worship of Bel, Osiris and Vishnu, and even allied itself with sacrifice, and a priesthood, which claimed absolution from sin. Poon A eoOOPAR Re SENS UTE OR VER PRESEN? PRoNCiPLis OF RELIGION AS A’ PSYCHIC PHENOM- ENON. Reason cannot satisfy itself with merely observing what exists, but seeks to explore the origin of things, to find the First Cause. Reason is therefore an ever present and need- ful element in religion, whereby the sources of religious knowl- edge are increased, furnishing the mind with a variety of truths, fitting man to reason on the subject, and thus as he fol- lows the dictates of reason, the more confidently he relies on his conclusions. Reasoning, he counts the stars, weighs the mountains, fathoms the depths, and, the employment be- comes reason, for the succé§s is glorious. But, in “searching to find God unto perfection,’ (Job 11:7), reason must be silent: revelation must speak. Similarly in conscience is seen a natural tendency toward re- ligion, which not only enjoins the law of duty, but intimates that there is a Judge by whom this law will be sustained and executed. Reasoning in search after truth man is no better than his principles. Right principles lie at the foundation of moral obligation. Thus his conscience must be governed by light and truth, and just so far as his character is controlled by conscience, 24 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? it is controlled by principles, which in primitive man, as well as in all men since, are the same according to the degree of light possessed, which indeed is a phenomenon, and more so, since these principles are at the foundation of primitive credulity. It is only another evidence of a fall from a higher and nobler state. The true character of the pagan world is to be traced to the respective principles of their beliefs, and it is impossible that these people, in the exercise of their rational faculties should be controlled in any other way. If we pass next to the affections, we recognize again that man’s nature was formed for religion. The first affection awakened is filial love, a grateful sense of parental kindness, which is at the same time the seed and principle of religion. Thus the first spontaneous and developed impulse is not only an element of piety, which is the foundation of virtue, but emotion toward God, creating reverence, admiration for the beautiful, and gratitude. This is indeed a phenomenon, that religion is natural to every man, everywhere, and in all ages, and seen specifically in that the human soul has mainly two central principles which are essen- tially fitted to raise it to God; namely, the insatiate desire for happiness, and the longing for perfection, a deliverance from all evil, and the realization in character of that bright ideal of which all noble souls conceive. Henry Ward Beecher once declared that “religious systems do not create the religious nature. The religious nature itself, craving and longing for development, creates both the systems and the priests who minister in them. The heart, with its thou- sand tendrils, reaches forth to God, and in its reaching clasps whatever it may. A student, annoyed by the notes of the canary- bird in his window, says, ‘It is the robin in the opposite cage that makes the canary sing,’ and so he takes the robin away; but still the song goes on. It was not its companion that made it call, but something yearning out of its own little bosom; and because of this yearning, whether alone or with its mates, in summer or winter, in light or darkness, it still will sing.” Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 25 “So the heart yearns and calls for God; not because of out- ward solicitation, but because of the longing, the want it feels within. No difference of teachers or systems can change this nature of the soul. The ocean is the same, whatever craft sail up and down upon it, whether they be pleasure-boats, brigs, mer- chant-ships, or men-of-war; so whatever religious navigators may be going up and down the sea of life, its depths, and shores, and distant haven remain the same. The stars never change for astronomers or astrologers. They roll calmly above the storms and above opinions. So man’s nature does not vary for cir- cumstances, or conflicting views, but still wants God above, and fellow-man below.” CHAPTER III. 2) THE POWER OF WORDS; POTENCY )0O isp CURSE; SACRED NAMES; THE CEREMONIAL LAW; DIVINATION AND PREDICTION. As there is reason to be- lieve that Jehovah communicated the fundamental principles of religion to the first parents of the human race, it is natural that the sacred word was traditionally taught their descendants. These traditions spread themselves generally among the tribes and nations concerning a Supreme Being who created the world and later flooded it with water. Bricks and tablets with inscrip- tions have been discovered, emanating from Accadian, Egyptian, Assyrian and Chaldean sources, coinciding with the narrative ot Moses, whilst many others so vary as to be contradictory. Even traditional stories of the ancient patriarchs and Hebrew leaders, mixed with pagan mythology, are found connected with those of the Egyptian and Greek gods. This illustrates how words became the channel of communication, and were not sim- ply spoken ideas, but the close inhabitants of the inner spiritual being. Thus many shrines, sacred groves, hills, mountains and streams tell of genii who were invoked by former generations. Plutarch affirmed that “if one traverse the world, it is possible to find cities without walls, letters, kings, coins, schools and theatres ; but a city without a temple, or that does not practice worship, prayers and the like, no one ever saw.” This is substantiated in the observation of Dr. Guthrie, that “man can as well live physically without breathing, as spiritually without praying. There is a class of animals, the cetaceous, neither fish nor sea-fowl, that inhabit the deep. It is their home; they never leave it for the shore; yet, though swimming beneath its waves and sounding its darkest depths, they have ever and anon to rise to the surface that they may breathe the air. With- out that these monarchs of the deep could not exist in the dense element in which they live, and move, and have their being. And 26 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 27 something like what is imposed on them by a physical necessity, even natural man has to do by a spiritual one. It is by ever and anon ascending up to God, according to the light that he has, by rising through prayer into a loftier, purer region for supplies of Divine grace, that he maintains his spiritual life. Prevent these animals from rising to the surface, and they die from want of breath; prevent him from rising to God, and he dies for want of prayer.” Thus words, breathed out in petitions, when the heart is par- alyzed with grief and fear, or throbbing with joy, always sought the god whose existence was seldom doubted. In all primitive re- ligions the efficacy of sacred words not only influenced the re- lations of life, but bound the gods. They developed into songs, chants, charms, exorcisms or incantations by which demons could be set free or held at will, and spirits called from any quarter. (a) THEN THROUGH THE MAGIC WORD, the under- world for the time being was supposed to have lost its power. Dr. Allan Menzies, in his “History of Religion,” p. 96, informs us that though the character of spirits was unknown, yet “cer- tain charms and incantations were believed to have power over them, and communication with the unseen world took there- fore the form of magic. The earliest portions of the sacred literature consist of spells or charms believed to possess this vir- tue, and these were never displaced from the collection; on the contrary, new spells were written even after higher spiritual be- ings were known and more ethical forms of addressing had been devised.” “Especially were all pains and diseases ascribed to the agency of spirits or of sorcerers and witches, their human allies, and the sick person naturally sent for an exorcist to expel the spirit which was tormenting him. Some spirits were more powerful than others, and the stronger spirit was invoked to rebuke and drive out the weaker. The spirit of heaven and the spirit of earth were adjured to conjure the plague-demon, the demon who 28 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? was afflicting the eye, the heart, the head, or any other part of the body. Magic is everywhere an early form of religion which is only overshadowed, not killed, when a great religion arises, and which tends to reappear.” As to their imprecations of evil, Prof. Sayce, in his “Hibbert Lectures,” p. 309, says, “In ancient Assyria the power of the curse was such that the gods themselves could not transgress it.” Even the repetition of these imprecations of evil, as»stimu- lants, which became a mere jargon of words or unintelligible sounds called “the gift of togues,”’ is said to have had effect upon gods and demons alike, especially upon an enemy person or tribe. (b) The repetition of sacred names also grew into a form of ritual claimed to be divinely inspired, which ethnologists term “THE LAW AND THE PROPHETS?”= Ther lawywaewese sentially “TABOO,” a word taken from the Polynesian dialect, meaning to prohibit. These were established laws as to certain duties and actions in the tribe or nation, which if broken, often carried with them the sentence of death. Wallace, in his “Malay Archipelago,” p. 591, informs us that “a palm branch stuck across an open door, showing that the house is tabooed was a more effectual guard against robbery than any amount of locks and bars.” It is here again that Dr. Menzies, the ethnologist, with interest remarks, (Hist. Rel. p. 72), in opposition to the affirmation of Plutarch, “the early world had no temples, nor idols, nor priests: the worship of nature does not suggest the enclosing of a space for religious acts. The natural object being the sacred thing, worship is brought to it where it stands; the gift is car- ried to the tree or the well, and if the deities sre conceived as being above the earth, then the tops of hills are the spots where man can be nearest to them, High places are sacred in all lands. Groves and remote spots are also sacred. When man was carrying on his struggle with wild beasts he would regard with terror the places where they had their lairs and strongholds ; it was in this form that the feeling of mystery with which Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 29 moderns regard places where they are cut off from all human in- tercourse, first appealed to man. After this earliest stage had passed, and the grove had come to be regarded as the dwelling place of a deity, it became a place man did not dare to approach except with the necessary precautions. It became taboo, which indicated that which man must not touch, because it belonged to a deity. The god’s land must not be trodden, the animal dedi- cated to the god must not be eaten, the chief who represents the god must not be lightly treated or spoken of. There was danger at every step that one may touch on what is forbidden, and draw down on himself unforeseen penalties.” (c) CIVIL AND CEREMONIAL LAWS were at first com- bined and then later divided, proving that their gods, as they be- lieved, had now control over the tribes through ‘the priests, who uttered prophecies or predictions in oracles and divination, as they or certain mediums arose, versed in the practice of religious rites and startling phenomena. A curious treatise on DIVINA- TION, or the knowledge of future events, Cicero has preserved in a complete account of the state-contrivances which were practiced by the Roman government, to instill among the people those hopes and fears by which they regulated public opinion. Through the aruspex, the augur and the astrologer the superstitious minds of men were controlled. The pagan creed, now become obso- lete and ridiculous, has occasioned Cicero’s treatise to be rarely consulted; it remains, however, as a chapter in the history of man. CHAPTER IV. 3) PRIMITIVE RELIGION AS EXPRESSED IN THE RITE. Myths, custom and sentiment then became the founda- tions for more or less elaborate rites in ceremonial worship, first used in the interest of the individual, then in communities and on special feast days, as talismanic, and that through magic force, by which to compel the will of the higher powers when not afraid of them; and then, in order to appease the wrath of the gods in the offering of sacrifices. (a) THE EARLIEST SPECIES, OF SACK IEIC I is arcuee seen in the rites of individual persons in the worship of some specific god, as a patron saint, who provided, kept and taught the mysteries of the faith. The child at birth, or perhaps a few days later, was given the name of this deity, which event was celebrated with much festivity. Numerous vows were laid on the child by the priest in the presence of this god as guardian angel, which the mother promised to fulfil until the child arrived at years of discretion. From twelve to fourteen years of age the boy or girl, pref- erably the boy; for girls were more often looked upon as soul- less, was prepared under this sacred name, known only to the immediate family and the priest, and through much ceremony ushered into the larger life by tests of all kinds, ofttimes very cruel and resulting in death. Perhaps the noblest conception of this rite is seen in the Athenian Oath. Each youth, coming to the threshold of man- hood, stood in the presence of the Judges of the city and sub- scribed to the famous oath: “I will not dishonor my sacred arms. I will not desert my fellow soldier, by whose side I may be set. I will leave my country greater and not less than when she is committed to me. I will reverently obey the laws which have been established, and in time to come shall be established by 30 + oh pee met Ae Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 31 the judges. I will not forsake the temples where my fathers wor- shiped. Of these things the gods are my witnesses.” The person taking such an oath, and before some specified god, stood, lifting his hands toward heaven, reverently, frequently accompanied with a sacrifice according to the nature of the rite. Thus the girl also submitted to a ceremonial initiation into wom- anhood, which being ended, the priest called attention to the sacred and mysterious manner in which nature had announced the fact that she was ready to embrace the duties of matrimony. Such individual rites governed from birth to death, when it was hoped these would be rewarded by the patron god for all the service, worship and sacrifice rendered. (b) COMMUNAL RITES were celebrated at the annual or periodic festivals, lasting for many days. Dr. Rawson, in his “What the World Believes,” p. 52, describes the position of the priests as mediators between gods and men. ‘They offered the sacrifices and prayers of the people to their deities; and on the other hand, were employed by the gods to interpret their divine will to man. Thus the office of priest was held very sacred, and in some parts of Greece this dignity was equal to that of kings. Some temples were served by priestesses, who were chosen from the most noble families. Inheritance was the customary tenure by which the holy office was held; but it was also, in other cases, acquired by lot, by the appointment of the prince, or by the elec- tion of the people. “Every one appointed to be a priest was required to be free from bodily disease or ailment, and to possess a pure and upright mind; for it was not thought right that one who was imperfect or impure should take part in the worship of the gods, min- istering in holy things. To every god a different order of priests was consecrated. There was likewise a high-priest, who superin- tended the rest, and executed the most sacred rites and cere- monies. When the priests officiated in the temples, the garments which they wore were made of fine flax or linen. They common- 32 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? ly descended to the ankles, and were of a white color. They wore crowns, and their feet were bare. “Sacrifices were of different kinds. 1) Vows of free-will offerings: these were such things as were promised to the gods before, and paid after a victory. 2) Propitiatory offerings, to avert the wrath of some angry god. 3) Petitionary sacrifices, for success in any enterprise. 4) Such as were imposed by an oracle. 5) Sacrifices in honor of the gods, from respect and veneration in their worshippers, or the sacrifices offered by those who had escaped from some great danger. Different animals were consecrated to particular deities. A stag to Diana, a horse to the sun, a dog to Hecate, to Venus a dove. “Those who sacrificed to the infernal deities were dressed in black ; to the celestial in purple; and to Ceres in white. Various ceremonies were used in the performance of the sacrifice. The infernal god offerings, who were supposed to hate the light, were frequently made at midnight. The victim was killed by the priest, or sometimes by the most honorable person present. Prayers were offered up while the sacrifice was burning; and if the deity was a gay and aerial power, music was played to propi- tiate his favor. Sometimes they danced round the altars, while they sang the sacred hymns. Of all musical instruments the flute was chiefly used. After the sacrifice there was generally a feast, where the worshippers drank to Sos and continued to sing the praises of the god.” Masses of people gradually joined in these communal services. Though not so intended in the beginning, yet they developed more and more an appeal to their sensuous natures, which made them more popular. First they consisted in special offerings, which were burned upon their altars, gradually extending to a whole herd of bulls; then were added the sacred dances, sump- tuous banquets, national games and theatrical performances, from which emanated the tragedy, drama and comedy, in which they enacted the myths surrounding their gods and godesses from ancient times. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 33 Here the Saturnalia and Bacchanalia are most conspicuous, in which drunkenness and sensuality were very common. Crimes, according to Livy (39:8) did not remain confined to the devotees of these gatherings, for many innocent people would be fraudu- lently drawn into these orgies, and if they protested, would be silenced by the deafening sounds of drums and cymbals. Sacrifices among the ancients were embodied in offerings of human beings, animals, cakes, fruits and libations, the last named in the form of pouring unmixed wine or other liquid, either on the ground, or ona sacrificial victim in honor ofa deity. As civili- zation improved, human sacrifices were gradually omitted, when they thought the gods would be satisfied with merely a few drops of human blood. However, for a long period these were pre- sented on annual or state occasions, as for instance at the festival of Apollo, when a human victim was thrown from some high precipice, only to be dashed in pieces on the rocks below, and in the presence of many witnesses. All primitive people, as far north as Germany, selected an- nually some of their best and most prominent children, some- times of a kingly household, who were killed, cut in pieces in the presence of the parents, and burned on the altar, believing there- by to satisfy the craving of their gods, and supposing these ever afterward to be serving the gods in the underworld. Gradually, as Eusebius observes, Emperor Adrian ordered these sacrifices abolished ; because the gospel of Jesus Christ had already made strong inroads on paganism, when only slaves and criminals were offered instead. As these practices receded, animal sacrifices became most common. The victim being selected according to the character of the god to whom it was offered. Very often large numbers of these were sacrificed at once, the gods delighting only in the savory odor and cloud of smoke that arose from the altars. Thus each god had his specific offering, either a bull, cow, ram, sheep, horse, dog or fish. During the ceremony, incense and wine were thrown on the carcass and prayers offered. These 34 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? ceremonies very often required the grossest licentiousness, ac- cording to instances already cited, and at the festivals of Bac- chus, the Lupercalia in honor of Pan, the Ludi Florales in honor of Flora, Cybele and Venus, all noted for their lewdness. It is to these that St. Peter refers, (I Pet. 4:3-4), “When we walked in lasciviousness, lusts, excess of wine, revellings, ban- quetings, and abominable idolatries.”” And it was a strange thing to the pagan mind that the Christians did “not run with them to the same excess of riot.” Of the unbloody sacrifices there were offered cakes and fruit. The cakes were made of flour or wax, and offered as a symbol of the real animal intended for offering, because of the great expenses to the poor, which thereby were avoided. Those of fruits and flowers were most common at the time of harvest as a tribute of gratitude. (c) There was alsoa REAL END TO BE ACHIEVED BY SACRIFICE. Not possessing the high ideal of the Hebrews in their burnt offerings, to whom these prefigured that great and admirable Oblation which should purge away all sin; the pagan mind had contracted as was common to all mankind, a real guilt, evident from the working of the individual conscience, proving that the moral law had been broken and which subjected the offender to death, temporal and eternal. They had for a long time that which remained of the ancient tradition concerning the true God, beside what was evident from His wonderful works in nature. This revelation should have checked their growing idolatry, which defect cannot be charged to God, nor even to some of their most eminent philosophers, who tried to dissuade them from many of their vulgar practices, but they must blame themselves and be judged accordingly. (Rom. 2:14). The natural mind then, conscious of the wrath of the gods they worshipped, had to be appeased in the form of a propitiation or atonement for sin. Nothing therefore was too good or expensive for this rite, where- by they hoped to attain mercy, forgiveness and immortal life. CHAPTER V. 4) HEATHEN: OR PAGAN RELIGION AS A MEANS OF SOCIAL BETTERMENT. Modern ethnologists claim that the religions of primitive peoples were the means of their social betterment. The celebrated French atheist, Mons. de Voltaire represented them as “consisting only of morality and festivals or times of rejoicings.”” To accept such a statement would place the revealed religions either on a parallel, or deny them altogether, which object seems clear even to the uninitiated in the mysteries of ethnology. The fact of a distinction however, is clear. Instead of social betterment, there were only degradation and oppression. Much rather would we accept the words of Dr. Sykes, in his “Con- nection and Principles of Natural and Revealed Religion,” pp. 431, 432, 383, where he says, that “by the addition of very much absurdity and folly, by the gross idolatries they had every where established, by the abundance of fables they had mixed with truth, by the apparent falsehoods they had embraced; and through the great danger which every good man incurred who should venture to show them the pure truth; there was the necessity of a reformation, and of calling men back to the rule of action. How to remove the loads of rubbish which by degrees had been thrown upon the beauteous fabric of truth, was more than the wisest mortal could tell or dare to undertake. Every crevice was stopped by which light might enter.” (a) Carefully acquainting ourselves with the writings of the ancients, we find the social and moral conditions then existing as one dark picture of immorality and crime. FAMILY LIFE as the unit of society had no stability. Certain learned men here and there tried to guide the people into a higher state of civiliza- tion and religion, but they only helped becloud the picture still more. Here and there as their women were elevated to positions of honor, to thrones, others as prophetesses and godesses, they nevertheless represented but an imperfect and immoral sense of 35 36 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? their assumed characters. Their prostitution, yoked with super- stition, and sanctified by their rites, produced only evil effects upon private and public morals. From their sacred groves, shrines and temples emanated streams of pollution which entered every condition of society affecting the family most of all. Rome, reaching perhaps the highest stage of civilization pre- vious to the incarnation of Jesus Christ, considered children mere- ly slaves, and women as children of their own husbands. After the destruction of Carthage, certain laws in this connection were changed, allowing greater privileges; but as divorces increased, crimes multiplied, and the worst sins were committed with bare- faced audacity. The Greeks with all their pride of culture, religion, law, art, and disdaining others as barbarians, simply copied the laws and practices of others. Their religious civil laws, even those of the celebrated law-giver Lycurgus, were intended perhaps to make men good soldiers, but proved very defective indeed, according to Aristotle, in effecting civil justice and honesty; and in dealing with the slaves, often murdered in cold blood for fear they might become too numerous or powerful and endanger the state. With both Rome and Greece, uncleanness as a religious civil rite was accounted a glorious and honorable thing. Socrates might have said the same of the age of Seneca and Nero as he did of his own to his pupil Alcibiades, “Do not hope ever to suc- ceed in reforming the morals of men; the best course we can take is to wait patiently; yes, and we must wait until some one comes.” This sorrowful longing became the wailing cry of woman- kind, the family, and men everywhere. There was universal unbelief ; and still a longing to believe in something. There was universal inability to find anything worthy of belief. Pilate’s question, “What is truth?’—received no answer but its own tantalizing echo. ‘All religions are true,” the people said, “one is as good as another.” “All religions are false,” the philosophers Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 37 answered, “‘one is no better than another, solace yourselves with any or all, poor fools, it makes no difference.” The oracles were silent. Plato forbade intemperance, except- ing at the feast of Bacchus. Aristotle forbade lewd images ex- cepting those of the gods and godesses. The usual worship was one of horrible uncleanness. “It is difficult,’ said Pliny the Elder, “to say whether it might not be better for men to have no religion, than to have such an one as ours.” An argument may meet a contrary argument, but no argument can overwhelm a fact, and, in the face of these facts, and as opposed to the position taken by our modern ethnologists, we must affirm that the pagan religions were not a means of their social betterment. PHePAGAN VRELIGION AND HE ADVANCE, OF POSITIVE KNOWLEDGE. As the idolatry of the ancients increased, peculiar is the fact that they advanced in culture. It is natural to suppose that as men developed intellectually, re- ligion, the arts and sciences would progress together, the one affecting the other for the better. Possibly again our modern theorizers have for this very reason overlooked a distinction be- tween natural and revealed religion, in order to harmonize them- selves with evolution. It is evident, however, that the spiritual atmosphere of the extreme ancients was clearer, wherein they still adhered to the revelation of God as handed down from the first parents of the human race, and not because of the efforts of their own reasoning powers, which were little cultivated. “Reference to a primitive religious instinct in mankind,” says Max Mueller, (Chips etc. vol. 1, p. 372), “is not satisfactory ; for though there must have been such an instinctive sentiment in the earliest men as the basis of their future idolatries, it could only have impressed on them the existence of some Divine Be- ing, but in no degree involved the conception of that Being as one and one only, but, as all history proves, tended to the very opposite. Nor can it be said that the Hebrew worked out the great truth by a profound philosophy, for no contrast could be 38 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? greater between the Jewish mind and that of other nations of antiquity sprung from a different stock, than the utter absence from it of the metaphysical speculation in which other races de- lighted. “Yet, while all nations over the earth have developed a re- ligious tendency which acknowledged a higher than human power in the universe, Israel is the cnly one which has risen to the grandeur of conceiving this power as the One, Only, Living God. If we are asked how it was that Abraham possessed not only the primitive conception of divinity, as He had revealed Himself to all mankind, but passed, through the denial of all other gods, to the knowledge of the One God, we are content to answer that it was by a special divine revelation.” Thus God, like the sun, can be seen only by His own light. The first chapter of Genesis in itself, stamps the canon, which it opens with the seal of inspira- tion. This proves the pivotal difference between Israel and the Gen- tiles, according to the Prophecy of Isaiah, (43 :9-12), as presented in “The Expositor,” (1916, p. 517), wherein he pictures a dramat- ic “scene in the court of the universe. Nations of people are as- sembled. ‘They are challenged to prove the divinity of their gods, whether they can foretell the future as they claim. Silence reigns. As there is no answer, Jehovah turns to the Israelites and calls upon them to testify to His power to foretell the future and to deliver His worshippers. That is the real mission of Israel, the reason they were chosen in Abraham out of Ur in the Chaldees, from among the nations, to be witnesses to the whole world of the power and goodness of Jehovah, and to declare that He is the Supreme Ruler of the universe.” And no wonder there was silence in the court of the universe, for all other religions had become obscured by the introduction of a multiplicity of. idols, and far more so as they increased in worldly knowledge. Their reasoning became so mixed with priestcraft and mysticism that even nature could not be ap- proached by common sense. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 39 The same can be said concerning their development of the arts and sciences. In some way or another these are connected with all the powers and faculties of the human mind, which perhaps reached their zenith in the Egyptians, Greeks and Romans, the last named however, were only imitators of the former, except- ing in warfare, wherein they excelled. As they advanced in one direction, they receded in the most important, for all their culture was entangled with their rites and ceremonies. Polio R IMEC Ee PRACTICE, OR ART.= “lhe table of Vulcan and his wife, of his forging thunderbolts for his fa- ther Jove, was in all probability based on the ingenuity of a smith who forged the best swords and designed the most artistic shields, and received in return the hand of the most beauti- ful lady in the land. It is in this way that the mind stamped it- self on the pyramids, monoliths, obelisks, shrines, temples and the arena, mostly modeling their images of the gods and godesses according to their description of them in the Iliad. It is thus that the arts were refined, and several of them reached perhaps their highest point of perfection. The architecture and sculpture of ‘that day have never been surpassed, if equalled; it was the reign of taste and genius. CHAPTER VI. 5) DID PRIMITIVE RELIGION THEN EXERT AN IM- PROVING INFLUENCE ON THE LIFE OF THE INDI- VIDUAL? With the former dark picture before us, where depressive clouds hover low upon the individual heart and life, nothing could be applied as a corrective directly or indirectly that would check the depraved energy of passion and appetite. There was no im- proving influence, for there was nothing to give it impetus. Their culture only brought to mind every conceivable form of imagina- tion, which naturally resulted even in the denial of the doctrine of immortality, once universally held, which finally was ridiculed by the sages of Greece and Rome. To this Pliny added that “all men are in the same condition after their last day as before their first; nor have they any more sense either in the body or soul after they are dead than before they were born.” Underneath all this corruption however, and although their culture was but an imperfect guide and impotent tutor, yet God, though imperceptible, still yearned to be their God, for whom He had a divine purpose, in that He awakened in them the noble faculty of reason, inspired them to wonderful works of art, and by deeds of heroism and genius caused them to be the educators of the world. Opposed then to the position of primitive credulity and the in- teresting defense of evolutionistic ethnologists, the Apostle Paul, (Rom. 1:18-32), in the words of J. Oswald Dykes, is very ex- plicit in his indictment: “St. Paul’s first proposition is, that from the first the heathen knew enough of God from His works to render them without excuse for not worshipping Him. Secondly, he declares that the heathen have hindered from its just in- fluence the truth which they did know respecting God. He traces polytheistic and idolatrous worship to its root. Its first origin he finds in a refusal to walk honestly by such light as nature 40 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 41 afforded. For this primary step in the very old and very fatal path of religious declension men could excuse themselves under no plea of ignorance. The next step followed surely. That truth about God’s real nature and properties, which men would not strive fairly to express in their worship, became obscured. Van- ity and errors entered into human reasonings on religion. ‘Men became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened.’ The third step downward was practical folly in re- ligion. Nature worship involved symbol worship. Symbol wor- ship rapidly degenerated into sheer idol worship. “Tt is in this deplorable and criminal perversion of the truth, this religious apostasy, that Paul finds a key to the personal and social vices of heathendom. When the human heart shut out the self-manifestation of the true God, refused to know Him, and worshipped base creatures in His room, it cut itself off by its own act from the source of moral light and moral strength. A bad and false religion must breed a bad and false character. It ought never to be forgotten that heathenism is not simply a misfortune in the world for which the bulk of men are to be pitied but not blamed. It is a crime, a huge, next to world-wide, age-long crime, with its roots in a deep hatred of God, and bearing a pro- lific crop of utterly inexcusable and hideous vices. To prove this is the end for which the passage is introduced by St. Paul.” Primitive credulity in its search after truth may be commend- able as far as it reaches, but Christian experience proves that no one by searching ever found out God. Truth and God are one. It can come from no other source. It must be revealed. Modern speculators and theorizers with their evolutionistic tendency ac- cording to the method of ultra rationalistic criticism along the lines adopted in recent years, if they would acknowledge after a most destructive world war, which resulted as the consequence of such reasoning, the proofs and authorities quoted in honest research, facing the Truth as it is revealed, must change their mode of procedure under the search-light of the Bible, which once 42 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? again stands firmly vindicated, and bury all their former glory in profound obscurity. Our study of primitive credulity leaves much to be desired, recognizing with St. Augustine the profit enjoyed where a spir- itual God is defended; lamentable is the fact that no road of ap- proach is divulged. The whole system reveals no Saviour from sin, no hope, no life, no immortality. No voice is heard saying, “Come unto Me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden.” We notice how conversant was the Apostle on this mighty sub- ject, as seen in his remarkable letters to the Corinthians, and his address on Mars’ Hill before the Athenian philosophers, where he used the inscription on one of their monuments, “TO THE UNKNOWN GOD,” as his theme; quoting even from their own poets Aratus and Cleanthes and saying, “Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, Him declare I unto you.” By rearing this altar or altars, as Jerome in his “Commentary on the Epistle to Titus,” (1:12), observes, “TO THE GODS OF ASIA, EUROPE AND AFRICA; TO THE UNKNOWN AND STRANGE GODS,” they certainly acknowledged their ignorance and need of instruction. Verily the time had come for a religion by revelation, even as it is in the Redeemer, Jesus Christ our Lord. “For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that be- lieve,’ (1 Cor. 1:21), concerning which the Apostle said, “I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ, for it is the power of God unto salvation;’ (Rom. 1:16), at a time when even the Gentile sages acquiesced in the judgment set upon their remark- able intellectualism, showing forth the extreme corruption of re- ligion and manners throughout the pagan world. He knew that the greater part of mankind had been wandering in paths which resembled an inextricable labyrinth, the deadly vapors of which extinguished the faint light that conducted their footsteps. He knew that the mischief of philosophy is in the fact that it is natural, but not spiritual. CHAPTER VII. As the position taken in the former argument has shown itself opposed to that of modern specialists in the science of ethnology upon the basis of evolution, our concluding remarks must present A VINDICATION OF THE REVEALED RELIGION as taught and exemplified in the person of Jesus Christ, which a false science would ignore, although it never requires an apology, standing as it does on a solid foundation. True science is not speculation, but whole truths, not hypoth- eses which may explain the phenomena of nature; but principles which do explain them and are verified by them. The Christian Religion is the development of faith into One Ethical Spirit as the Ground and Lawgiver of the universe, the Father and Re- deemer of mankind, as presented in the Bible through revela- tion. However, as noted, a controversy is evident, and we are told that the chasm is so wide that it cannot be bridged, for deism, atheism, rationalism, evolutionism and materialism as developed from scientific and philosophic research have each in turn ruled the minds of men as against religion. But the assertion that true science is at war with religion is superficial; for as revela- tion is from God, just so is true science in its development through the mind of man; for truth is never at war with truth; and, as science means truth as developed from nature, so religion means truth as revealed in God’s Word, in daily experience, and in the development of the soul. Science has widened our vision of God, by enlarging our con- ception of the universe, for men long believed the earth the center of creation. Astronomy appeared, proving that this is only one among myriads of worlds. As astronomy widened our concep- tion of space, so geology came forth to show a long succession of periods in which the globe was slowly formed to become the home of man; for long periods of time had to elapse in order to cool 43 +4 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? the earth to support animal and vegetable life, proving, that “one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years asvone day. (2; Pet: 328) Science has helped theology by the teaching of natural law. It is an axiom that the realm of nature is a kingdom of law, where regular order exists and where no accidents happen, even in the performance of miracles on the part of holy men of old, for these must come under the category of higher laws unknown. God is therefore seen as a perpetual Creator, not sitting on the outer rim of the universe “watching things go round”; but, liv- ing in all life, working without rest in and for the good of His creatures. Science has helped theology to see things as they are, and relieved the mind of man from innumerable fears, which oppressed him in his ignorance for ages. It has given him greater liberty to think, resulting in luxuries to his use and enjoyment, of which former generations never dreamed. Quick transport, a share in galleries, museums, a voice in the government, while his own possessions are no longer at the mercy of a master; and justice and protection are within the reach of the poorest. Add to this free education, sick, old- age and death benefits, and he must admit, that he is living in a peculiar age. And still— “How many lifted hands still plead Along life’s way. The old sad story of human need Reads on for aye.” However, the craving of the soul, which earthly knowledge cannot satisfy, is gloriously met in the Truth which came down from heaven, who established the faith that should transform the knowledge of men. Other religions are on the decline, but Chris- tianity, which only is worthy of the name, is progressive in re- vealing the wisdom of God through the Holy Spirit in His Word. Many questions which science could not answer are hereby made capable of solution according to the dispensation in which men have or are living. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 45 Dionysius, the tyrant of Syracuse, once asked Simonides, one of the seven wise men of Greece, “Who, and what is God?” After four days deliberation, Simonides answered, “Sir, the longer I think upon the subject, the more I am lost in its difficulty and immensity.” Thus God only could answer that question, which He has done by saying in His Word, “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” “I am God, and there is none else, declaring the end from the beginning, and from ancient times the things that are not yet done.” “I, (Jesus Christ) and the Father are One.” Thus God revealed Himself in His Son, and continues to widen the conceptions of men concerning Himself from age to age. When the Presbyterian Commission assembled in Westminster Abbey in 1643, numbering I21 ministers, 30 laymen, and 5 com- missioners from Scotland, to form a confession of faith, they too came upon this question, but no Scriptural answer satisfied. George Gillespie, the youngest delegate, was requested by the moderator to pray for light on the subject. He began reverent- ly with those words that became historical, “Thou, who art a Spirit, infinite and eternal, unchangeable in Thy being, wisdom, power, holiness, justice, goodness and truth,’—the Spirit of God revealed Himself through prayer. Verily, “the secret things belong unto the Lord our God; but those things which are re- vealed, belong unto us and our children forever, that we may do all the words of this law.” What effect then has this revelation upon science in general? Religion is the cause and science the effect of the progress of humanity. An era of stagnation befell the Church as well as na- tions after the Nicene Council in the year 325, but a warm sum- mer flowed over Europe with the Reformation in 1517, and not only was there a revival of religion, but the renewed faith created a renaissance in art, in literature and science throughout the world. Freedom in religion gained liberty for thought wherever it penetrated, applying the principle of truth to human needs and wants. | 46 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? Thus the great discoveries have gone into human life, former- ly enjoyed by the few, enhancing the value of every living soul. Take away this faith in the worth of man, substitute for it the Darwinian theory, make the strong stronger, and let the inferior class die out, and we lose one of the mightiest motives of human progress. The evidence for evolution therefore, even in its mild- est form, can in no way be compared to the value of the results of revelation. Truly Cowper mused: “Knowledge and wisdom, far from being one, Have ofttimes no connection. Knowledge dwells In heads replete with thoughts of other men; Wisdom in minds attentive to their own.” Science then, as science, knows nothing of God, revelation or immortality. Just so, religion as religion, knows nothing of scientific discovery or natural law. Yet the one cannot be with- out the other. Cause and effect are inseparable. In fact the great temple of the universe has two orchestras, revelation and science. The first has her musical instruments all strung, ready for a burst of eternal accord. Science is only stringing her in- struments. Some glad day, very soon, when the promise of the coming of the Dayspring from on high is fulfilled, when as Lord of lords and King of kings He shall blend heaven and earth in one har- monious whole, then the orchestra of revelation, and the orchestra of science will respond to each other in celestial wisdom and knowledge, and into one wreath shall be twined the Rose of Sharon and the Laurel of Scholarly Achievement, and the roar of the ocean will be the magnificent bass of the temple wor- shipers, of which earth itself will be the pedals of the great organ, and heaven the keyboard. “The age grows old; triumphant wrong Stripped of its mask stands full disclosed; Embittered, stung with shame, yet strong, Vows vengence dire on all opposed, While truckling half-hearts grasp its hand, And softly modulate their tone, Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 47 With shrewd exeuse inactive stand, And make that deadly cause their own. O ye few true-hearts, sad for you, Were there no succor ye could gain, Alone you would be quenched as tow, Your hope is, “He shall come again. He comes to raise up righteousness, And, justice fallen in the street; He comes the weak and poor to bless, And raise the fallen, to their feet. He comes to raise death’s captives up, He comes to take His purchased throne, He comes to raise earth’s buried hope, And wear His resurrection crown. He comes the usurper self to slay And give to love the imperial seat, To bring earth’s resurrection day, And make His people’s joy complete.” SHALL JESUS FIND FAITH ON EARTH? Il. ACCORDING TO ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY; or, THE SCHOOLS OF GREECE; THEIR INFLUENCE THEN AND NOW CHAPTER VIII. Philosophy has been called the science of general principles, or, the development of the conception of life according to natural and moral laws. The impotence of many so-called philosophers lies in their indifference to the general principles of life; as men live; life here, now, and in a world of real and perplexed and suffering men and women. Not so with those early sages, who with their knowledge of the forces of life have passed into his- tory, and are still in this remote age teaching the world. Greek philosophy began with speculations on the natural laws of the world, the form, origin and primal elements of the uni- verse, which in the sixth century however turned to reflection or analysis of human striving and acting, the highest good, and the ideal of a perfect moral life. This briefly sums up the whole trend of philosophical thought in ancient Greece, which will be closely followed in our dissertation. - To know the philosophy of a nation means to know how it answers the main questions about life. Its answers are found in its history, its literature, its business standards of honor and taste, its courts of political institutions, its conceptions of ideal personality, its energy, resources and will power. In every age the more extensively men have been moved by their ideals, the clearer they have reasoned, and thus society and the participating individual have reached the desired ends foreseen by enlightened persons. 48 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 49 Ideals mark the goal of progressive movement. If human life can be conceived as devoid of ideals, progress cannot be as- serted. There could be no progress; only a material existence would be the lot of man. The brute animal has no ideals. Its round of activities is pursued in the same limited area, and in precisely the same way its ancestors followed for centuries. Man, with his ideals toward which he is ever moving, has illimit- able areas of activity, is ever increasing his activity to be, to do, and to develop a sensitiveness and receptivity toward ever higher ideals, that is, if he lives true to his ideals that in his present stage of life are moving him. If he belittles them, or crushes them out, or is devoid of them, he is steadily deteriorating and tending toward the mere animal, which knows only existence but not life. It is because of this that the whole system of realistic or materialistic philosophy of so many minds, tends toward the final conclusion reached by the dying Frenchman, who exclaimed, “Behold, I die, without having lived.” No mere animal has been known to reveal religious aspiration. It is without the constructive force of religion; nor is it con- scious of any need of it. Man, however, is the subject of the action and inter-action of spiritual forces that ‘take possession of him and continuously shape for the better his purposes and im- part ideals. Whatever the ideals may be, for economic justice affecting the industrial field; social service, to help the needy; truth in art; peace among nations; pursuit of truth; growth in spiritual char- acter and worth; all are so many expressions of the life of God in men, working out through various channels. In so far as man is conscious of these ideals as springing forth from the life of God and imparting a moral and spiritual impetus to his activities, is he essentially a religious being. Here is the source of incentive to high endeavor and better living, the development of ideals that become realized in human experience and thereby lift the plane of social life the higher, as 50 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? well as that of every individual who is conscious to any degree of participation. This is true of every age, and particularly of the ancient Greeks, at least in their schools, and that from a peculiar instinc- tive religious and intellectual standpoint, according to natural phenomena, although we cannot harmonize their position upon this subject with their formalism in temple worship and gross idolatry, wherein perhaps they reached the zenith of corruption in a stupendous system of mythology. This would indeed be a paradox beyond all comprehension were it not for a divine pur- pose in the development of the minds of men throughout all ages in every department of education, morally and intellectually. “Philosophy consists not In airy schemes, or idle speculations: The rule and conduct of all social life ‘Is her great province. Not in lonely cells Obscure she lurks, but holds her heavenly light To senators and to kings, to guide their councils, And teach them to reform and bless mankind.” Thus the Greek word for ‘ethics,’ originally meaning some- thing rooted or grounded, was used by Aristotle as well as by Homer: and Hesidodus as a residence or home, in contrast with the general Attic usage of it as the natural character or faculties of a man. The philosopher first used it as that which remains seated or grounded morally, becoming thereby the norm and rule in the experience of practical life, whilst other things have floated away with the tide of time. Philosophically then, ethics means a building upon the natural ground or foundation of man, the development of humanity, the relationship of man toward his fellows; whilst on the other hand, the conception of ‘Christian ethics’ is supernaturalistic, dealing with sonship, or the relationship and resemblance to the Divine, developing man from his moral consciousness as it is influenced by | revelation, which is far nobler, and inconceivable by the natural mind of man. So far nevertheless, we have seen that Greek philosophy in the Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 51 course of its history now narrowing and again enlarging in its scope, has stood for the investigation, formation, explanation and interpretation of the entire universe, the world of things and minds in their relations, and the sort of life best adapted for the welfare of the human race. It is an attempt to deal with the whole experience of life, willing to consider conclusions in the light of new evidence and fresh facts, and, in contrast with the sciences, which do not always face the facts, it is the only department of human knowledge which questions in part and as a whole the resulting experience as to cause and effect, the meaning and the value of life prin- ciples. “Serene philosophy, Effusive source of evidence and truth! Without thee what were unlighten’d man! A savage roaring through the woods and wilds, Rough clad, devoid of every finer art And elegance of life.” (Thomson). CHAPTER IX. 1) THE DEVELOPMENT: OF FAGAN, PHILCOSOR on. PRIOR TO THE BIRTH OF JESUS CHRIST OURO: The literature of Greece is by general consent the most re- markable in existence. Though perhaps surpassed in extent and variety by the literature of one or two modern nations, yet in view of its originality, its perfection of form, humanly speaking, and its prodigious influence as the source and model of all sub- sequent works, its claim to first place can scarcely be questioned. There are five distinguishable periods in the literature of the Greeks, which portray the development of philosophy prior to the birth of Jesus Christ: The Epic and Lyric period, from the earliest times, to the Persian wars; the period of Attic perfec- tion, to the time of Alexander the Great; the Alexandrian period, to the Roman conquest of Greece; the Roman period, to the reign of Constantine; and the Byzantine period, to the capture of Constantinople by the Turks. The later works of this mass of material have lifted their philosophy from a mere collection of writings to a sharp historical criticism, and a purer, deeper philosophical understanding. The periods of the development of Greek philosophy within the given periods of their literature, though a more difficult task, may be divided and treated as follows: a) The awakening of the philosophical spirit is seen in the ex- press tendency of speculation upon the nature of the world, from Thales to Anaxagoras, (640-428, B. C.), and the Atomists. The form of philosophy in this period tended toward a reflection upon evidences as such, termed cosmological speculation, yet not without some mathematical and dialectic or logical foundation. It is accepted by most critics that Thales of Miletus, (640-546 B. C.), the founder of the Ionic school, himself held that’ all things were developed by God from water and to which every- thing returned. Although Thales is considered the first Greek 52 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 53 philosopher, it cannot be said that he was the first to present this conception, if the supposition be allowed that the Attics early sent the wisest of their men into Egypt and other parts of the East, to observe their laws, and on their returning, incor- porated a part of the Mosaic writings into their own, early giv- ing the idea, somewhat according to the creation story, that the earth came up out of water. ; Others contend that Cicero’s citations were somewhat cor- rupted and therefore not clear, claiming that Thales actually de- sired to convey, and the possibility of his being of Phoenicean extraction, in harmony with the accepted development and his- tory of mythology from Phoenicia, which knew nothing of the formation of the world by an intelligent mind until later Anaxa- goras conceived it, that he supposed the divine substance to be the ether which envelops the universe, the fountain of life to all beings; the sun, moon and stars being filled with this ethereal substance therefore are gods, and that the souls of men are particles thereof. This conception naturally is in harmony with the foundation laid for polytheism, or a multiplicity of gods. It was Anaxagoras, (500-428 B. C.), the teacher of Pericles, Socrates and Euripides, who first asserted that an infinite mind, separated from matter, first planned, and then put in form and motion, out of the chaos of nature, all things in the universe, holding that all matter is eternal; but he did not adhere to this principle in accounting for the phenomena of nature, which he ascribed to material causes. Upon these hypotheses, though there are minor ones between, there followed a system of philosophy which attempted to ac- count for all material existence in the universe as constituted of minute particles, or atoms. The atomists as centered in Leucip- pus and Democritus about the year 430 B. C., explained all things as due to the ceaseless movement of atoms differing in shape, order and position. Democritus held that even the soul of man consists of the finest, roundest, smoothest particles. They taught their many followers the theory, more in vogue 54 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? today than even then, for is not this the foundation of the de- structive system of materialistic evolution’—that there was an innumerable company of these particles, flying and roving about in a void space, at length hitched together and united; by which union they at length grew into this beautiful, curious, and most exact structure of the universe. That the universe and the souls in it were formed by a fortuitous concourse of atoms is no more possible than that the accidental jumbling of the alphabet would fall into a most ingenious treatise on philosophy. However, there is here seen the far reaching effect of the awakening period of philosophy. b) In the second, or blossoming period, we notice that philo- sophical thought is focussed upon man, as a thinking, moral be- ing; the gradual development of moral philosophy and the science of logic; although here is recognized a partial return to the teach- ing of the first period, a mixture of natural and moral philos- ophy. Public teaching in the form of open discussion is here early evidenced through known application of dialectic forms, that is, the determination of truth and error by a process of analysis, a characteristic expression of ideals: from the Sophists to the Stoics, Epicureans and Skeptics. About the fifth century, B. C., attention turned from the crude cosmological speculations of the past, thus preparing the way for Socrates and his successors. The relativity of knowledge here led to the philosophical position of subjective idealism, which practice, though commendable for its persuasion in matters of opinion with the sincere search and sound establishing of the truth, soon degenerated into political and social corruption. Aside from this conclusion, the fact nevertheless stands that this is the period of that higher philosophy, which treats of the in- tellectual and moral constitution of man, of the foundation of knowledge, of duty, of perfection and relationship toward God. It is the period wherein the analytical mind achieves its fullest capacity in logical thought, but also one wherein its limits are evident, being finite and therefore unable to fathom the Absolute. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 30 c) The blossom develops into fruit. There follows a period that was completely pantheistic, the principles of which were matter and force, with God as the dynamic power of the uni- verse. Even the soul of man was considered material, as part of the etherealized substance of which all things were made, and therefore subject to dissolution. The philosophers of this school held that sense and sense-perception were the foundation of all knowledge. As all things were divinely and wisely planned, it behooved the created to submit in all things, the agreement of human conduct with nature. It is only in this wise, they claimed, that man can achieve virtue and prove himself what he ought to be according to the pattern of God as set forth in their concep- tion of Him in the character of Zeus. Philosophy rose to its highest level through the Stoics at a time when the Greek mind was on the decline. An extreme doctrine now sets in with Epicureanism, wherein the chief end of man is taught to be pleasure and happiness, as found in self-restraint and right living according to conscience and the natural principles of life. A misunderstanding of this philosophy however led many into excess and riot, which soon brought the whole system into discredit. However, from this circumstance the many followers of Epicurus were called “the philosophers of the garden of selfishness and pleasure.” How natural this is for many since, who, of the world only, believe in this type of a religion, and make the teaching of its principles their standard of morals. More by far “belong to the phil- osophers of the garden of carnal selfishness and pleasure than to the garden of Gethsemane.” It is extreme materialism. Epicu- reanism can only mean, the corruption of morals. While the method and conclusions of all the schools were essentially skeptical, yet the actual skeptics were the Pyrrhonists. Their teaching was chiefly based upon the doctrine of the rela- tivity of knowledge, upon which they proceeded to deny that any thing is in its own nature honest or dishonest, good or evil, but only by virtue of the laws and customs which have obtained 56 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? among men; which corrupt system has also proven a mistaken foundation for the proper regulation of the morals of mankind. d) As seen, the fruit of the tree of philosophy never comes to maturity, because it is worm-eaten at the root. The decline now sets in. This period is remarkable for its philosophical medita- tions on the being of God, and the relationship of man and the world toward Him, including the development of physics, ethics in general and logic, from the time of the new pythagorism until the entrance of the neoplatonic school: all very admirable, but, there is also evident the submersion of the mystic in the Abso- lute, when finally the Hellenistic method of reasoning melts into oriental theosophy through orientalized Greeks, Jews and Egyp- tians. The loss of the systematic understanding of the character of Greek philosophy, because of the general weakening of the once peculiar strength of the Greek mind, through the spreading in- termixture of oriental influences throughout the then known world, is indeed deplorable beyond expression. The real cause of this collapse is the evident weakness of both, their religion and philosophy, neither of which at any time could be thoroughly united, an experiment tried very early by Xenophanes and Parmenides among the Eleates by the incorporation of Hindoo theosophy, and the acceptance on the part of Pythagoras of many Chinese doctrines, which however proved to belong to the realm of phantasy and not to reason. Summarizing their philosophy and religion from this gen- eral survey it is easily recognized that all their reasoning was so mixed with priestcraft that no premise could be approached un- hindered by common sense, which is the fate of all philosophy ancient and modern. Fable and tradition have always hindered the march of reason and truth, and where philosophy differs with revelation it can make no public advance. Dr. F. W. Gunsaulus in his reply to R. G. Ingersoll, said, “‘it was when it was at its supreme strength, and when Christianity was a babe in a manger, that anti-Christianity had a chance to Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? oy? show its ‘beauty.’ You say that it was not what skepticism is at the present day, and I acknowledge that it is so. Why? Be- cause nineteen centuries have rolled like waves of light between, and Christ has improved it in spite of itself. Never had the world so good a chance to see what absolute skepticism and un- belief could do and would do for the liberty of the human soul as then.” Pap ILE UN EOENGH OR THE -VOUARIES OF - GREEK Po LOSORAY: Pythagoras of Samos was the first to modestly call himself a philosopher, in the sense of a friend of wisdom. He declared the purpose of philosophy to be the observation and investigation of nature, out of which is developed the fact that it is independent of all material influences and is therefore dynamic in its own laws. This conception of nature in a general sense was early taught by the Greek schools, and even previous to these by the cultured nations of Asia, but its assertion carries little if anything specif- ically philosophical. But, if the investigation or reasoning here be used intensively, then the more or less poetic observation of nature as early noticed among the Greeks and Orientals must be excluded, and there steps in a searching and questioning as to FROM WHAT, BY WHAT MEANS, and HOW, WHAT WE Bier ens COME IN TOME XLS PENCE WHAT ASSIS SIGNIFICANCE? When in the riddle of nature man finds it in order to solve the problem, searches for a point of view, a principle from which he can observe the singular, combines the same into thought, he is in a position to give an explanation for the same. This position was early taken by Thales of Miletus, a con- temporary of Solon, who, as has been noted, conceived the primeval cause of all things to be water, because he so reasoned that the seed and nourishment of all things is dependent on moisture, and as warmth is here developed from the same source, 58 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? the effect is that all things are compactly held together; where- as, he claimed, the inflexible objects are lifeless. It is at this point that Aristotle begins his history of phil- osophy, declaring that after Thales, Anaximenes conceived the idea that the element or foundation of nature is air or ether, that our souls are atmospheric because all life is dependent on breathing, and the world is enveloped in ether. It is thus out of the condensing of air that he explains the phenomena of rain, snow and earthquakes; the vari-colored rainbow he explains as the sun’s rays falling across the condensing air or cloud. The modern exponent of this theory is the British scientist, Sir Oliver Lodge, who recently declared that “ether is greater than matter, and this will be an accepted scientific fact within the next ten or fifteen years. But the ether of space is a sub- stantial reality, with extraordinarily perfect properties, with enormous energy, a constitution which we must discover, and a substantiality more impressive than that of matter, for matter is made of ether.” As novel as all these speculations may appear, there is how- ever to be noticed the philosophical mind proceeding from a certain principle or premise, dependent thereon, and binding every observation. Greek philosophy therefore begins with this purpose, to explain, dependent on the said principle, the mani- foldness of the bodies and phenomena. Certainly already here is seen the veiled question of a first cause, a Being Absolute, the Creator of all things. The attempt which here underlies this unexpressed supposition of a unity within a multiplicity of things, within illimitable and manifold phenomena, testifies to a true and deep reasoning power. An experiment proceeding from this supposition, eventually led to a deeper and wider exploration of nature, which, as these inquiries developed in their totality, became the first part of philosophy, called physics by the Greeks, which now with us, excepting in a much wider sense, belongs to natural science. Aristotle is clear here with the fact that physics first went out Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 59 from geology, which comprised not only what we now under- stand by that term, but to it also belonged physiology, mineralogy, botany, zoology, astronomy and mathematics; this last science however, Pythagoras lifted to an integral element in philosophy. Even Greek theology formed a part in their physics, for, their knowledge of the gods came from their observation of nature and thus the soul of the world and the firmament was taken to mean so many different systems of divinity. Long previous to the conclusion of this first part through Plato and Aristotle, there is seen the beginning of the second epoch of Greek philosophy, namely the Dialectic, particularly de- veloped by the Sophists. Dialectics first meant the art of dis- putation, in which the Athenians became adepts with much pride: this art then led to the proper use of the laws of language, gram- mar and logic, to which was added metaphysics in its dealing with the principles of human knowledge, rhetoric and poetry. Greek philosophy in its influence upon its votaries raises it- self in its third main division exclusively to an ethical platform, which comprised not only what we now understand by morals, but in a sensible way included politics, or the science of arrange- ment, administration and government of the State, because in the State ethics first came to its peculiar development. The father of this new departure was Socrates, whose inspired wisdom made the nearest approach to the divine morality of the Gospel, thus making him the most original of all the philosophers. Declining to be initiated into the mysteries of the religion of the Greeks, he was regarded as the representative of a widespread rationalistic movement; yet he referred the people to the oracles in matters of religion, recommended divination, and advised the worship of the gods according to the laws of the country. Socrates endeavored by his moral sayings to engage those he conversed with not only to abstain from things impure, unjust and base when they were seen of men, but even when they were in solitude, as being persuaded that none of their actions can be concealed from the gods. In many of his teachings we notice 60 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? that he uses the term ‘God’ instead of a plurality of gods, as on occasion he tried to bring men to a right sense of God and Providence and the honorable and just worship due to the Divin- ity, as the first and most universal law of nature. Naturally in his conception of the Divine Being, calling him Zeus or by any other name, he of necessity remained indefinite. Also his discourses on the immortality of the soul and a future life or state of happiness were entirely new to the pagan mind, which teaching he often represents as of greatest importance to the cause of virtue, and confines its understanding principally to those who had made much progress in wisdom. None of his disciples, except Plato, dared deal with so sublime a doctrine; here Socrates outreached them all, and in this he planted the zenith of all moral philosophy. Thus with the Greeks everything worthy of human thought and research belonged to philosophy; but, in order to know how, and by what means the votaries of these great minds and systems were influenced and carried forward their ideas and ideals, it is necessary to understand their method of reasoning. In order to appreciate their contribution to the world of knowledge a few in- timations in reference to the fundamental principle or idea of philosophy may suffice. It is impossible in a single sentence to set forth what it means to think. The shortest and best answer may be learned by the science of logic, wherein we come to know what a conception or an idea really is, form a right judgment and conclusion, then only in the sense of philosophy can a proper understanding be reached. Philosophy demands a true and intensive course of thought; but, not all thinking may be termed philosophy. Think- ing, in its broadest sense is that peculiar activity of the human mind which is as involuntarily and unconsciously performed as seeing, hearing and breathing. Right thinking has been defined as the spiritual respiration of the mind, which is as necessary to it as the regular usage of the nostrils for the working of the lungs. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 61 Every rational human being begins to think from the time when consciousness appears until it disappears. Minds of men, how- ever, are differentiated according to the nature and method of thought, right or wrong, clear or not clear, good or evil, great or small ideas; setting them apart from other creatures. In order then that this broad and seemingly unlimited idea be under- stood, it is necessary to remind ourselves of the main functions and expressions exercised every moment by the mind. All reasoning exhibits itself therein :—1) When we take an impression on the sensitive plate of the mind, either by hearing or learning; 2) When we give something of ourselves, or communicate or teach others; and, 3) Between these preceding two functions, there is the possession of something which is characterized “to know,” or knowledge which is relative. All this has reference to general reasoning. But, over and above this general and natural method of reason- ing, which is practiced involuntarily and somewhat unconscious- ly, there is possible nevertheless, a voluntary, conscious, de- termined and often strained method, yet ordered and systematic, which proceeds as already cited, from a given principle or prem- ise, to which it is relative, and then binds all the different observations with that leading thought. The difference is simply this, that while general thinking is directed mainly toward out- ward appearances, the philosophical mind takes hold on what 1s within a given object, which with the senses alone cannot be perceived. This inward, discernable essence of a thing is then the con- ception or the idea of the thing conveyed to the mind. The idea is the discerned thing. To seek this and to proceed in the opera- tion of intensive concentration, is reasoning, in a narrowing, focussing sense, which then becomes synonymous with phil- osophizing. Again, philosophical reasoning is differentiated from general thinking in that it is directed toward itself and making it- self the object of action; in reality it is a reasoning upon reason, even as philosophy was thus strikingly defined by the ancient 62 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? sages, which therefore makes it the highest grade of accomplish- ment, the termination of all thought, the first of all the sciences, without which all science would be impossible. Thus the object-matter of philosophy may be distinguished as pertaining to God, or nature, or man. Underlying all inquiries into any of these departments, there is a so-called first phil- osophy, which seeks to ascertain the grounds or principles of knowledge and the causes of all things. Hence all philosophy has been defined to be the science of causes and principles. It is the investigation of those principles on which all knowledge and all being ultimately rest. Upon this basis Socrates claimed that the true philosopher must make clear, according to the laws of logic, what is the ulti- mate end of striving, or, what is the highest good, and be able to give a definition to the meaning of these predicates so that men may become familiar with them and regulate their characters from the foundation of such principles. He asserted, in which assertion Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics and Epicureans all con- curred, that there is no virtue without knowledge, in fact that virtue is a form of reason, that only such as possessed true knowl- edge and therefore virtue, were capable of governing the State, that either kings must become wise men, or wise men kings. He declared that it is only when men in this way come to know themselves that they can reach perfection, when they learn to put into practice the three cardinal virtues of wisdom, courage and self-control, that they can achieve justice, happiness and perfection as natural beings in this life, thereby establishing the fact that they are the handiwork of an all-wise and beneficent Creator. Plato here naturally and in accord with his master proceeded to establish the principle of an “Idea of the Good,” claiming this as the ultimate goal of our intellectual endeavor, which is revealed as we follow the argument whithersoever it leads, ulti- mately coming back to ourselves. He thus defines the intel- lectual soul as having been created by an intellectual God, as Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 63 His highest human product, and that no State or society of men can exist happily or successfully unless placed in the hands of philosophers. The principles which influenced Aristotle, who, following Plato, became the most elaborate of the Grecian philosophers, be- gin with his statement that ‘every thing which moves must have an immovable mover, the first principle of motion, subsisting as a properly producing principle, and as eternally motive.” With this declaration it is recognized that he leaned toward the Atom- ists, and this, as the most popular theory, was held more or less by destructive criti¢s down the ages until the present, until it became a mania with Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, (1844-1900), who applied the same to ethics with the object of developing the so-called “superman.” Ethically, Aristotle dealt as Socrates and Plato preceding him, with “The Highest Good,” claiming that it is a particular excel- lence of the soul of man, which like all organic being possesses sensation and desire, but that it alone can reason. As the crown of creation in the possession of reason, man’s peculiar function as a good man is virtue, the ultimate basis of knowledge and be- ing. | It is in this way that the Greek mind, through the interpreta- tion and influence of its votaries, ‘““met the Socratic demand for a science of the good. They take into account the place of man in the cosmos, and then attempt to define his idea, that is, his natural and divine purpose, and to show how he may realize this purpose. The conception of the perfect man which they ad- vance, essentially resembles the popular Greek ideal.” (Paulsen, “System of Ethics,” p. 53). tev IOUS SCHOOLS Oh CREE Kee REIL SSOP HY AND WHAT THEY STOOD FOR; The modern school claims its development from the founda- tion of the various systems of reflective thought of the early Greeks, wherein is distinguished the poetic-mythical-religious way of explaining the problems of the universe and the ex- 64 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? periences of life, and, the method which uses reason to find the ultimate bases of knowledge and being, which (latter) also bore two characteristics, namely, beauty of form in expression, and freedom from the conventional on the one hand, and on the other freedom from the superstitious and monstrous. It is of ut- most importance to be acquainted with the several systems of thought or philosophy, in order to focus the light of our gen- eral subject upon them. The philosophers belonging to the Ionic School, often desig- nated as the colony of Miletus, are Thales, Anaximander, An- aximenes and Anaxagoras. Thales of Miletus, (640-546, B. C.), a Greek physical philosopher, was the first to reasonably present and explain nature by giving attention to water, from which as a principle, all things emanated and to which all things re- turned. How this was explained cannot now be conjectured. In his teaching there is traceable doubtfully the recognition of a personal and superintending deity. He founded Greek astronomy and philosophy and the science of abstract geometry. Specula- tive reasoning is here unknown. No record of his works can be found excepting as he is referred to by later writers; but, upon the basis of philosophical knowledge he is numbered among . the seven wise men of Greece. Much has been falsely attributed to him which is merely interpolated and unauthorized matter, although he always will be looked upon as the first philosopher. Anaximander, (610-546, B. C.), a disciple of Thales, was the first teacher of philosophy in the public schools, giving attention to the infinite as the principle and element of being, distinct from the elements and matter as such, or better, the unbounded eternal indeterminate. This theory has given rise to no end of argument throughout the ages. He also claimed that the origin of the lower species of animals arose from the influence of the sun upon the slimy substance in the previous chaotic condition of the world, containing seed, whilst human beings developed from fish. These principles are evidently evolutionistic and similar to Darwinianism. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 65 Anaximines, the third in the series of the Ionian philosophers, living a little later than Anaximander, sought to prove the in- finite as air, which divided is fire, and condensed—wind, then a cloud, then water, earth and minerals, from which other things are produced. Little, further than his theory, is known of him. Anaxagoras of Clazomenae, (500-428, B. C.), is considered the most illustrious philosopher of this period, and even re- garded as the father of modern science. He taught the eternity of matter and the constitution of things as resulting from the combination of ultimate elements under the control of a supreme intelligence. He came to Athens in the year 480 B.C., where he labored for thirty years, numbering among his pupils Pericles, Socrates and Euripides. He abandoned the ideas of his predecessors and, instead of regarding some elementary form or matter as the origin of things, he conceived a supreme mind or intelligence dis- tinct from the visible world to have imparted form and order to the chaos of nature. On account of this innovation he was indicted for his impiety. In the Ionic School it is noticeable that some philosophers as- sume prior while others adopt posterior principles; one appeals to reason, the other to sense, with little general difference. Reduc- ing these four systems of this school to a conclusion, we find the universal nature seeking its being, which it ultimately finds only in itself as matter and perhaps some intimations as to the deriva- tion of the elements out of primitive matter. The mind of man alone could penetrate no further to seek the object of its search. The second school of philosophy was the Eleatic, founded in Elea, a Greek colony on the south-western coast of Italy by Xenophenes of Colophon, (538-500, B. C.), who was forced to leave his native land on account of the Persian wars. He arose in opposition to the teaching of the naturalist Heraclitus of Ephesus, (535-475, B. C.), who, in accordance with the Ionic school regarded all things as resulting from a single primitive essence which he termed “fire,” from which all things originated and to which all things returned; also that the processes of 66 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? change are presided over by divine law or universal reason. Xenophenes his opponent was a traveling poet and philosopher, teaching the whole of nature to be God. His school became famous through his pupils Zeno of Elea, Melissus of Samos, and Parmenides, who reasoned from the principle of their master that the Absolute or Pure Being was the only real existence, and that all phenomena were unreal, in opposition to the denial of all being according to Heraclitus. The changeful world of the senses is an illusion for the Eleatics, just as the substantial world of the senses is an illusion for Heraclitus. Each as so often hap- pens had grasped a great half-truth. Plato later recognizing this, attempted to reconcile the ideas of being and becoming, or ab- solute existence and phenomena. The third school of philosophy was the Pythagorean, founded by Pythagoras, a native of Samos, born about the year 580 B. C., who very early received instruction in the Ionian school, but spent the latter part of his life in southern Italy, where he be- came the leader of a religious revival. Aside from Thales, he is considered the founder of the science of geometry, and the discoverer of the musical octave. He had a large following both because of his philosophy and his new religion of affec- tionate morality and piety. Pythagoras taught that all things came from matter and form in perfect harmony and symmetry, strictly mathematical; that all the elements, fire, air, earth and water were made up of atomic plane figures; in other words, that numbers from I-10 govern all things, as I. bound, or the infinite; 2. the odd and even; 3. one or many; 4. right or left; 5. male or female; 6. rest or motion; 7. straight or curved; 8. light and darkness; 9. good or evil; 10. square or oblong; which together he called the ten coordinations. The fact which he tried to substantiate is that the whole universe is a mathematical problem; that all things go back to numbers, degrees and measurements. His system was later degenerated by the Pythagoreans into a superstitious mysticism, and particularly his recognition of the Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 67 immortality of the soul and of rewards and punishment after death into a coarse, erratic, and morally judicial evolution, that is, the transmigration of souls from body to body whether man or beast, which perhaps was adopted from the Hindoo philos- ophy. Pythagoras was more of a religious teacher than a philos- opher, for he claimed it his duty by divine commission to reveal a purer mode of life. The fourth school of philosophy was the Socratic, as founded by Socrates, (470-399, B. C.), who wrote nothing himself, but whose doctrines are preserved in the writings of Xenophon and Plato. Through the new method of dialectics he introduced his disputations, himself assuming the attitude of a learner, and leading his pupils from point to point, he gradually developed a recognition of their own ideas as true or false or until they involved themselves in self-contradiction or ridiculous absurdity, thus claiming that men must first be conscious of their ignorance before becoming wise. The central teaching of his moral philosophy, which with him now divorces itself from the natural or physical philosophy of the former schools, is identified with virtue and knowledge, holding that true knowledge can only be attained by a clear perception of what is true and good, which he conceived to be the chief end. In his plain and familiar manner of instruction he meddled lit- tle with the speculations of the philosophers about gods and the cosmological nature of things, yet he speaks clearly of the bless- ings of Providence to whom divine worship is due, but it is morti- fying that a person of so great understanding should send men to what was then called divination and the consideration of the oracles of the gods in order to know the Divine Will. According to Xenophon, he incessantly discussed human affairs in their relationship to righteousness, investigating—What is piety? What is impiety? What is the honorable and the base? What is the just and the unjust? Men who knew and practiced these principles he accounted good and honorable; men that were igno- rant of them he classed as slaves. 68 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? His theory of virtue consisted in knowledge; to do right is the only road to happiness; as all men seek happiness it is their duty to rise from ignorance to knowledge. It is thus that his influence affected the Grecian speculative intellectual world, never since paralleled. During the last eight years of the career of Socrates, Plato be- came his foremost pupil, thoroughly conversant with his system of dialectics and ethics. Long after the death of his master, he returned from a journey to other countries and at Athens began publicly to teach in the Academia, a beautiful enclosure or gar- den on the outskirts, over the entrance of which were inscribed the words, “NO ONE IGNORANT OF PHILOSOPHY MAY ENTER HERE,” and where he gathered together a large num- ber of distinguished followers. As a voluminous writer upon many and varied subjects he is claimed to be only the mouth-piece to hand down to posterity the intelligence expressed by his master. Yet Plato became a great social missionary and preacher of virtue. Knowledge with him did not mean mere speculation, but wisdom, and wisdom meant wise action, and wise action, virtue. The principles of his philos- ophy are, the Cause or Mover, Matter and Form; or, Cause and Matter. In many respects his teachings are similar to those of the school of Pythogoras and Parmenides. Ethically, Plato sets forth love and beauty with acute analysis. He made both moral instructors in order to power, so that in- dulgence in these instead of selfishness, is a part of one’s law- ful education, fitting him for a better discharge of his duties; and the power to do good is to be measured by the amount that he has in him as the result of the education which he has received by reason of these things. It is on this basis that he also claimed that human activity finds its sure foundation in human insight. He applied this particular principle with endless fertility to all departments of experience, to morality, to social relations, to religion, to science, and to the destiny of the in- dividual. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 69 And perhaps often reminded of the last hours of Socrates while discoursing upon his departure, it is no wonder that he so graphically sets forth the immortality of the soul, unsurpassed by any pagan composition. His works were admired by the Church Fathers as one who came in the fulness of time and destined to prepare the heathen mind for the coming of the Redeemer of the world, for no other thinker ever exerted so much power to vivify and unite the select minds of the ages. Although Plato may be termed the foremost scholar of the Socratic school, Aristotle must now be looked upon as his worthy successor. Of all the sages of antiquity Aristotle stands forth as the loftiest in intellect, and his philosophy, though cold, is re- garded as the best adapted to the practical nature of mankind pre- ceding the birth of Jesus Christ. He is the genius of the minds of men, presenting to the world every branch of knowledge, dealing with natural, moral and political philosophy, history, rhetoric and logic. In all his works Aristotle observes human nature and the ex- ternal world, in which he never neglects the noble and the beauti- ful. While Plato defined an intellectual God, Aristotle claimed that “every thing which moves must have an immovable mover, the first principle of motion, subsisting as a properly producing principle, and as eternally motive.” As with Socrates and Plato before him, he mentions it as an ancient tradition that the stars are gods, and that the representation of gods in the forms of men and the lower animals was added later, and denied that Provi- dence extends its care to anything below the moon. His is a strongly pronounced dualistic philosophy; matter and form, God and the world are distinct though inseparable existences; God is an act rather than a will, a process and not a person. Though no human mind is perfect, be it ever so brilliant; whether true or false in its conclusions, it must nevertheless be allowed that the Aristotelian philosophy has inspired the greatest systems of phil- 70 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? osophy and education, remaining a vitalizing force in religion and metaphysics to the end of time. A fifth school of philosophy was Epicureanism, as taught and founded by Epicurus, born at Samos, 341, B. C., who assumed pleasure to be the highest good. In the beginning he had a very large following, but eventually his theory of mental pleasure be- came misconstrued, and never as intended. They abused his love of virtue for its own sake because they had not suffcient elevation of mind to follow him intimately and intensively. In the year 306, B. C., he established at Athens a garden for the purpose of lecturing on his system, from which circumstance his followers were called “the philosophers of the garden,’ which they turned into selfishness and pleasure. This school more than any other, has grown by leaps and bounds, As has been said, “more belong to the philosophers of the garden of selfishness and pleasure than to the garden of Gethsemane, of self-denial.” Epicureanism means extreme selfishness. Finally came Stoicism, which left a more marked development of culture upon the Greek and Roman mind than Epicureanism. This school was founded by Zeno of Cittium, (350-258, B. C.), a pupil of the Cynics, and continued after the death of Cleanthes, quoted by the Apostle Paul in his famous Mars’ Hill address be- fore the Athenian philosophers: “For in Him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, for we are also His offspring.” (Acts 17:28). Stoicism became a religion with the Romans as represented in Epictetus, Seneca and Marcus Aurelius, for ethically, as with the Greeks, they sought to produce the wise man, by which they meant, one who should be independent of the passions and circumstances of life, dependent wholly upon the conception and working of con- science, which view later played such an important part in the history of ethics. This school peculiarly prepared the way for Christianity in the fulness of time to step upon the platform of religion and philosophy because of their so-called stoical de- pendence on the inner light, at a time when civilization was at Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 71 its lowest ebb. Insisting stubbornly on the independence of the individual from outward circumstances, and thinking themselves wise, they thereby proved their weakness and incapacity, which necessitated a new religion and a new philosophy to save the world from moral and spiritual ruin. Thus we find that the various schools which have flourished throughout the Grecian intellectual world, and also including those that followed, for all are based on these in one form or another, “may be divided into ‘two main classes, namely theistic and atheistic. The former class embraces all philosophic systems which assume a god of some sort as the originator and sustainer of the universe. It may be remarked in passing that theistic philosophies are more dangerous to human-kind than the atheis- tic class, for the reason that the former are well calculated to ensnare those who, by nature of training, have a repugnance to atheism. We need here pay no attention to atheistic philosophy for the reason that it is quite out of favor at the present day, and shows no sign of ever recovering a respectable status. “Confining our attention therefore to theistic philosophies, we find several classes of these, namely dualistic and pantheistic. Dualism is the name which philosophers have been pleased to bestow upon those systems which maintain that God, or the first cause, created the universe as an act of his will, and has an existence distinct and apart from it. These systems are called dualistic because they count God as one entity, and the universe or creation as another entity, thus making two entities. “Pantheism on the other hand, maintains that God and the uni- verse are one being. There are several varieties of pantheism which have many followers even among living philosophers, such as monism and pluralism. Monism is that variety of pantheism which is most in favor at the present day. This system assumes as the basis of reality an “absolute” or “all-knower,” a mon- strosity which comprehends in its vast being all things and all their relations and activities. Monism, therefore, asserts that there is but one entity. God has no existence apart from the 72 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? universe, and never had. ‘The latter is, therefore, eternal, and there has been no creation. “Tt is a remarkable and highly significant fact that the basic principle of this ruling philosophy of our day is also the basic principle of the rapidly rising religio-economic system of social- ism. For socialism is grounded upon the proposition that man is originally and essentially one with God and with the universe. From this strange agreement—this strange meeting of extremes —far reaching results may be expected.” (Mauro, Funda- mentals, vol. 4, chap. 5, p. 91-92). In the different positions taken then by the ancient schools which so peculiarly have influenced the thought of the ages, as evidenced by the preceding quotations, we find that all of them, more or less expressed principles according to their light, and it is possible that people were helped by them in their general practice. It cannot however be truthfully said, as so often as- serted, that the purer and noblest thoughts as expressed by them were merely “reasoned truth,’ for it is evident that many of their sages journeyed afar, and it is possible that they came in- to contact with other nations, particularly Israel, and from them and their traditions learned what had been revealed from God. Nor can it be claimed that any one of them set forth a com- plete system of moral philosophy, and many of them were hope- lessly wrong in principle and practice, especially where sensual pleasure was a common error, contradicting the very principle of knowledge which is virtue, according to the best of their teach- ing. Although the natural mind of man cannot receive the things of the Spirit of God, because they are spiritually dis- cerned, it is nevertheless evident that God most wonderfully endowed the Greek mind with analytical powers beyond its gen- eral capacity, and what it achieved or set forth through intel- ligence proves that He had a divine purpose through the Greek schools then and now. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? TES Pee Ui tae AR AGE RIT OL BACH ORs DHE «GREAT EEADERS OF THOUGHT IN ANCIENT'ATHENS. “He said: ‘But who are the true philosophers?’ ‘Those,’ I said, ‘who are lovers of the vision of truth!” (Plato’s Repub., Jowett, vol. 5, p. 475). According to Plato’s own answer there can only be three of these of importance, who though mortal and therefore imperfect, must nevertheless be regarded as peers among the characters of men in ancient Athens; namely, Socrates, Plato and Aristotle. The most celebrated philosopher, Socrates, was born in Athens in the year 469, B. C. His father, Sophroniscus, was a sculptor, which profession the son followed for some time. His physical constitution was very robust, enabling him to endure the hardest military service. As a young man he frequented the society of the physical philosopher Anaxagoras and his disciple Archelaus. He married Xanthippe, to whom three sons were born, and whose name is proverbial as a conjugal scold. He was prominent for some years in several wars and perhaps not until the year 406, B. C., is he seen to enter political life. Believing himself en- dowed with a divine mission, he claims to have heard admoni- tions of restraint from time to time, these perhaps referring to his conscience. Early in the morning he is known to have visited regularly the gymnasia, while afternoons he sought the crowds in the market place and always had a large following, teaching orally exclusive- ly, for no writings of his are in evidence, using a scrutinizing method of cross-examination. As characterized in Xenophon’s Memorabilia and Plato’s Dialogues, in which he is generally the interlocutor, he taught that life and teaching are inseparable, be- lieving that a thorough progress of society and the State de- pended on the education of the young, to which doctrine he ad- hered until the end, to the detriment of family life perhaps, be- cause nowhere does he seem to give much attention to women and children, possibly on account of a Xanthippe within his own household. 74 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? As a practical sage and moral philosopher Socrates is every- where depicted in glowing terms by all his biographers. Xeno- phon says of him that “he was so pious that he did nothing with- out the advice of the gods; so righteous, that he was careful to insult no one in the least, so lording over himself, that he never chose his own comfort in preference to what was right and good, so wise that in his decision between good and evil he never went wrong; the best and happiest person possible.” In his Symposium, Plato describes the disorderly arrival of Alcibiades, who is half intoxicated, but proceeds to eulogize Socrates in inimitable words and in the presence of his master: “I have heard Pericles and other great orators, but though I thought that they spoke well, my soul was not stirred. But this man brought me to such a pass that I have felt as if I hardly could endure the life which I am leading. He makes me confess that I ought not to live as I do, neglecting the wants of my soul and busying myself with the concerns of the Athenians. He is the only person who ever made me feel ashamed of myself. “He and I went on the expedition to Potidaea; there we messed together, and I had the opportunity of observing his extraordi- nary power of sustaining fatigue and going without food when our supplies were intercepted at any place, as will happen with any army. In the faculty of endurance he was superior, not only to me, but to every body; there was no one to compare with him. “Yet, at a festival, he was the only person who had any real powers of enjoyment, and, though not willing to drink, he could, if compelled, beat us all at that, and the most wonderful thing of all was that no human being had ever seen Socrates intoxi- cated; and that, if I am not mistaken, will soon be tested. His endurance of cold was also surprising. There was a severe frost, for the winter in that region was really tremendous, and every body else either remained indoors, or, if they went out, had no end of clothing, and were well shod, and had their feet swathed in felts and fleeces: in the midst of this Socrates, with his bare feet on the ice, and in his ordinary dress, marched bet- Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? fis ter than any of the other soldiers who had their shoes on, and they looked daggers at him because he seemed to despise them. He who pierces the mask and sees what is within, will find his words most divine, abounding in fair examples of virtue, extend- ing to the whole duty of a good and honorable man. This, friends, is my praise of Socrates.” This is but one instance of the high regard held for him by one of his pupils, yet it represents the acclaim of innumerable minds in every age who have looked upon him as the genius of moral philosophy, with a character and intellect at the head of his class. His fame, however, begins to wane when Aristophanes, in his “The Clouds” jealously and unjustly charges him with sophistry, and increasing numbers accuse him of impiety in not worshipping the gods, and for corrupting the morals of young men. He makes no defense expecting to be freed from the charge. Yet he was condemned to death. During thirty days in prison he conversed along the lines of his teachings with his loyal~and intimate friends. On the last day, in the year 399, B. C., he discoursed on the immortality of the soul, when with virtual self-immolation as the conjoint root of the cynic and the stoic, he drank the poison cup of hemlock, a species of cicuta, while his friends watched him gradually die. Thus perished the most original and greatest of Grecian philos- ophers. What a pathetic ending to that matchless pagan life! Next in order, Plato now steps to the platform. Desiring to get a correct view of his character, there is needed a shifting of our focus to survey aright, as his is an entirely different per- sonality from that of Socrates, although they possess and present so much in common. Born at Athens in the year 427, B. C., of royal blood, at twenty he began his career as a poet, but after eight years as a pupil of Socrates he turned his attention toward the teaching of philosophy. At the close of the life of his mas- ter, and after many and long pilgrimages to other countries, he was sought as a teacher by Dionysius the younger, of Syracuse, who desired to be a warm friend of literature and gain distinc- 76 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? tion by literary composition. During the revolution which fol- lowed his entrance upon his duties, Plato was sold as a slave, but soon regained his freedom, and he returned to Athens when about forty years of age, where he began to teach philosophy in the Academia, which he bought for this purpose. He is the foremost philosophical writer of his age. The critics disagree as to the genuineness of many works attributed to him. Authentic are declared: the Republic—with the Timaeus—the Laws, the Symposium or Banquet, the Phaedrus, the Gorgias, the Theaetetus, the Protagoras, the Parmenides; a group of five pieces on the death of Socrates: the Euthyphrus, the Apology, the Crito, and the Phaedo. In all of these writings it is evident as with Socrates preceding him, and whose doctrines he im- proves, that philosophy did not mean mere speculation, but wis- dom, which meant wise action and then virtue. From this stand- point his school endeavored to set forth sound-mindedness which should lead to justice. For his time there seems to have been a great need for his posi- tion as a reformer, for the following fable depicts clearly the lamentable standard of morals that prevailed, which he uses as an illustration in his “The Republic”: ‘The liberty which we are supposing may be most conveniently given to them in the form of such a power as is said to have been possessed by Gyges, according to tradition, the ancestor of Croesus, the Lydian. For Gyges was a shepherd and servant of the king of Lydia, and while he was in the field, there was a storm and earthquake, which made an opening in the earth at the place where he was feeding his flock. “He was amazed at the sight, and descended into the open- ing, where among other marvels, he beheld a hollow brazen horse, having doors, at which he stooping and looking in, he saw a dead body, of stature, as appeared to him, more than human, and having nothing on but a gold ring: this he took from the finger of the dead, and reascended out of the opening. Now thé~— shepherds met together, according to custom, that they might Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? he send their monthly report concerning the flock to the king; and into this assembly he came having the ring on his finger, and as he was sitting among them he chanced to turn the collect of the ring toward the inner side of the hand, when instantly he became invisible, and the others began to speak of him as if he were no longer there. “THe was astonished at this, and again touching the ring he turned the collect outward and reappeared; thereupon he made trials of the ring, and always with the same result: when he turned the collect inward he became invisible, when outward he reappeared. Perceiving this, he immediately contrived to be chosen messenger to the court, where he no sooner arrived than he seduced the queen, and with her help conspired against the king, and slew him, and took the kingdom. “Suppose now there were two such magic rings, and the just put on one of them, and the unjust the other; no man is of such adamantine temper that he would stand fast in justice,—that is what they think. No man would dare to be honest when he could safely take what he liked out of the market, or go into houses and lie with any one at his pleasure, or kill or release from prison whom he would, and in all respects be like a god among men. Then the actions of the just would be as the actions of the un- just, just or unjust would arrive at last at the same goal. “And this is surely a great proof that a man is just; not will- ingly or because he thinks that justice is any good to him in- dividually, but of necessity, for wherever any one thinks that he can safely be unjust, there he is unjust. For all men believe in their hearts that injustice is far more profitable to the individual than justice, and he who takes this line of argument will say that they are right. For if you could imagine any one having such a power, and never doing any wrong or touching what was another’s, he would be thought by the lookers on to be a most wretched idiot, although they would praise him to one another’s faces, and keep up appearances with one another from fear that they too might be sufferers of injustice.” 78 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? It is against this state of society that such men arose to de- fend sound-mindedness and justice, wherewith Plato stands forth as a preacher of righteousness, according to the light which possessed him. Although his doctrines were too recondite for the popular ear, and few attending his lectures, yet if Zeus could moralize, he surely would have spoken as Plato did, who at his death in the year 347, B. C., and in his eightieth year, transferred his school to his followers, of which Aristotle later became the leading figure. Of all the systems of philosophy of antiquity, that of Aristotle seems best adapted to the minds and requirements of men then living, because of its concreteness and therefore practicability. He was born at Stagira, a seaport town of Chalcidice, in the year 384, B.C. Early losing his parents by death, he journeyed to Athens, where he became “the intellect’? of the school of Plato. After twenty years residence here he accepted an invitation from Philip of Macedon to instruct his son Alexander, to whom he gave seven years of his life, when again he returned, the Athen- ians giving him the Lyceum, where for thirteen years he de- livered his famous lectures. Mornings he tutored a select and older class of students, in the afternoons a much wider circle. It is said that he wrote from four hundred to a thousand dis- sertations. Possibly the story of Strabo concerning the destruc- tion of*his numerous works in a cellar is mere fable. Parts of his writings have been edited, as cited traditionally, by his pupils, and thus transferred to posterity, which are declared to deal with every phase of knowledge known to man, and upon which modern education in science and morals greatly depends for further development. His whole system of thought is founded upon a close observa- tion of human nature and the outer world, seeking to express not only the practical things of life but also the true and noble in ethics. He was the most comprehensive genius the world has ever produced. His inimitable brain sought out God if happily he might find Him, and, from a metaphysical standpoint he Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 79 certainly came nearer to the solution of the problem of the Deity than any mortal being by reasoning ever achieved. His view on this subject he sets forth in his “Metaphysics,” where he deals with “The Existence and Attributes of the Deity,” as follows: “The principle of life is inherent in the Deity; for the energy or active exercise of Mind constitutes life; and God constitutes this Energy; and essential Energy belongs to God as His best and everlasting Life. Now, our statement is this: That the Deity is a Being that is everlasting and most excellent in na- ture; so that with Deity, Life and Duration are uninterrupted and eternal; for this constitutes the very essence of God.” It is said that this doctrine brought on the charge of impiety, because thereby he neglected the worship of the Athenian gods, and he fled for his life “in order that the Athenians might not a second time sin against philosophy.” He took the charge so to heart in all the intensity of its persecution, that it sent him to an early grave at Chalsis, in the year 322, B.C. In fact it meant the decline of the Grecian schools of philosophy, for gradually now the world plunged into such awful moral and spiritual dark- ness that all cheer and hope were lost, at a time, when— “Careless seemed the great Avenger; history’s pages but record One death-grapple in the darkness, ’twixt old systems and the Word; Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne,— Yet that scaffold sways the future, and behind the dim unknown Standeth God within the shadow, keeping watch above His own.” CHAPTER X. 5). CAN THE DIVINE PURPOSE THEN BE RECOG- NIZED IN THE INTELLECTUAL AWAKENING THAT PRECEDED THE APPEARANCE OF OUR SAVIOUR? “In certain crises the mind of man, weary of that which is, reverts to its original powers, and from its own unbounded re- sources, begins anew its culture. The foundations of such crises are laid deep in the progress of humanity; they are dependent upon a long series of historical conditions, and therefore, they are rare. They never appear except in the fulness of time. “Such a fulness of time modern philosophy required for its independence of thought, with all the originality of its founda- tions, remains in constant intercourse with all its historical pre- suppositions. It contradicts them in its first period, and sharpens this contradiction to a complete contrast; as it progresses, it in- clines to them, and feels a kinship with them; and in its most re- cent period, it renews this antagonism and this relationship. Thus, modern philosophy always sustains a definite relation to the philosophy of ancient times, and never permits it to vanish from its horizon.” (Fischer, Hist. Mod. Phil., p. 140). Accordingly the Divine purpose seems to be to prove that the cultivation of reason and morals are laws in human nature, and to point the way in the crises which are inevitable, when men find themselves utterly helpless in their aspirations; “in Jesus Christ, who alone could solve the deepest and most difficult of this world’s problems, man’s salvation from the world. Jesus was the personal solution of this problem; He forms therefore the de- cisive crisis in the development of humanity, as Socrates was in the development of Greek consciousness. This comparison shows likewise the difference between the two. At this point in the history of humanity a spiritual renewing began. Before this was possible, it was necessary for the divine idea to be embodied in a person who restored and revealed the human archetype in Him- 80 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 81 self ; then it was necessary for humanity to recognize this arche- type as its own, and believe in the person Jesus Christ as the Sa- viour of the world. This faith in Jesus Christ forms the founda- tion and the principle of Christianity; it contains the problem which from that time occupied humanity, and out of which new problems are progressively developed.” (Fischer, Ridpath Univ. Lit., vol. 10, p. 140). If Jesus Christ “forms the decisive crisis in the development * it is historically evident that He stepped into the arena at a time when the world was prepared for His coming. And, truly the world was weary. It had tried to help itself dur- ing four thousand years and ignominiously failed. ‘Unless it please God to send some one to instruct us,’ said Socrates to his pupil Alcibiades, “do not hope ever to succeed in reforming the morals of men; the best course we can take, is to wait patiently; yes we must wait patiently until some one comes.” (Jowett). of humanity,’ And what had been the sorrowful longing of Socrates, had be- come the wailing cry of the world. The moral condition of society just previous to the coming of Jesus Christ was most de- plorable. There was universal unbelief; and still a longing to be- lieve in something. There was universal inability to find any thing worthy of belief. Pilate’s question, ‘““What is truth ?’— was an inquiry to which no answer seemed to come but its own tantalizing echo. “All religions are true’—the people said, “one is as good as another.” “All religions are false,’—the philos- ophers answered, “one is no better than the other, solace your- selves with any, or all, poor fools, it makes no difference.” The oracles were silent. Plato forbade intemperance except- ing at the feasts. Aristotle forbade lewd images excepting those of the gods and godesses. The usual worship was one of hor- rible uncleanness. The so-called golden age of the Jews, Greeks and Romans had reached past time, and the promised “Day- 82 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? spring from on High” delayed His appearance; and even pious hearts were heavy and the ages were sad. “Such is the aspect of this shore: ’Tis Greece—but living Greece no more. So coldly sweet, so deadly fair, We start, for soul is wanting there. Her’s is the liveliness in death That parts not quite with parting breath; But beauty with that fearful bloom, That hue which haunts it to the tomb, Expression’s last receding ray, A gilded halo hovering round decay, The farewell beam of Feeling past away. Spark of that flame, perchance of heavenly birth, Which gleams, but warms no more its cherished earth, Clime of the unforgotten brave. Whose land, from plain to mountain cave, Was Freedom’s shrine or Glory’s grave. Shrine of the mighty! can it be That this is all remains of thee?” (Byron) Ripe indeed was the period of His advent. The great clock of God, ticking slowly through the centuries, struck at the right hour, proving that “man’s extremity is God’s opportunity.” When men confessed that they could not help themselves, then God came to their aid. As to Abraham there was a ram caught in the thicket fit for sacrifice, so to men, helpless and hopeless, God came, giving them exactly by revelation what they needed, sight of Him, brotherhood with Him, the Sacrifice Once for All; the Way, the Truth, and the Life. History points to a golden milestone in the center of Rome, and it tells us that all the highways of the great empire radiated from it, and all petitioners traveled toward it. Thus also, and more so, can we say, that Jesus Christ, our Lord and Redeemer, is the Golden Mile Stone in the Kingdom of God. To it all human needs converge; from it all divine help proceeds. “I know men,” declared the great Napoleon, “but I tell you Jesus Christ was not aman. Socrates died as a philosopher, but Jesus Christ died like a God.” Verily He outgrows all human proportions. He is the Ideal of Perfection. “The same can be said of no other being that ever lived, no Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 83 matter what was the extent of his genius, the order of his talents, or the fashion of their exercise. Plato is not the constant theme of philosophy, for there have been and are other philosophers that divide with him the honors. Aristotle is not the sole repre- sentative of logic, for there have been and are logicians that stand his peer. Napoleon does not monopolize the admiration of those that study the art of war, for there have been, and perhaps there are now, other military chieftains whose achievements are of so high an order that they command the admiration of all mili- tary men. “And so in whatever sphere we find the great representative men of the world, we find that no one has been or is great enough to monopolize opinion and command universal homage. Whether you look at philosophy, poetry, music, science, art, or religion, you find that however great any actor has been, there have been other actors, both before and after, that divided fame with him, and had a common share in the applause and the remembrance of men. Only in respect of Jesus of Nazareth can it be said that one man had all, and was all, that one in His order could have and be. As a religionist, as a religious teacher, teaching in the twofold method of example and instruction both,—Jesus was opulent in gifts, so remarkable in manner and method, so magnificent in every class of equipment demanded by His mis- sion, that He represented and represents all there was and all there is to be represented to the devout attention of mankind.” (Murray). And once again, there is to be seen here the vital difference be- tween the followers of the lowly, incarnate God as recognized in Jesus Christ our Lord, and the followers of the sages, which is the difference between naturalism and revelation. One may be as beautiful as a Greek statue, gifted with genius, mannered like a prince, environed with all the luxuries of a palace, but, if with- in is an impure heart, an unscrupulous conscience, a perverted intellect, selfish and narrow motives, we declare such to be a whited sepulcher, and those who imitate them are blind. &4 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? But the divinely renewed heart, the new creature in Christ Jesus, with the life within the branch as it comes from the Vine, in quest of the noblest ideal, finds in Him the source of all right actions, of noble influences, truth, sincerity, love and light; prov- ing that The Star in which the nations were to rejoice was not to shine from the salons of philosophism, but by way of revelation. Therefore, a concluding survey of the great field of Greek phil- osophy will evidence the fact that “the affectionate morality and piety of a Pythagoras degenerated into the superstitious mysticism of the later Pythagoreans, and his immortality of the soul and of rewards and punishment after death, into a coarse metempsy- chosis. The clear and lofty Theism of Socrates, his recognition of virtue, and his perception of the true dignity of human nature, passed through Plato into the disputative skepticism of the Academy. The emphatic protest of the Eleatic school against a gross and materialistic polytheism, and its distinct consciousness of the unity and spiritual nature of God, became secularized in Parmenides, and atheistic in the skeptical sophistry of Zeno and the ascetic dualism of Empedocles. The idealistic philosophy of Plato, with its strong resemblance to revealed doctrine on the subject of God, the soul, sin and the other life, died in the prob- abilities and lax morality of minor philosophers. The philos- ophy of Aristotle, pure if cold, and elevating if selfish, ended in the materialistic atheism of a Strabo.” (Garbett, Hom. Encl., p. 81). Thus the age to which Jesus spoke had been experimenting upon existence without God. The earth glittered with the rem- nants of a magnificent civilization. Greek literature was rich with intellectual wealth. Art glowed with resplendent and death- less beauty. The Forum rang with echoes of a peerless eloquence. Yet the splendor of that age was but the glimmer of decay. Character touched bottom. Energy had gone. Vitality was spent. Dissolution had begun. Then Jesus spoke. The pulse of a new life began to beat. A soul sprang into being beneath the very ribs of death. The words of Jesus put an unspeakable value Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 85 upon the lowliest life at an hour when suicide was defended by the teachers of the day. The words of Jesus clothed the slave with humanity in a day when slaves might be nailed to a cross at the mere whim of a master. They wreathed childhood with a tender grace in an hour when children were mere ciphers in the social sphere of the world. They hallowed womanhood with a dignity of beauty that is to this day unknown outside of Christianity. Throughout the centuries, before and after that Voice was heard among men, there have been many wonderful words spoken, fire words that kindled noble enthusiasm; many thoughts have been uttered which have brought untold blessing; but noth- ing has ever entered the mind, or come from the lips, which could heal the sin diseased soul of man, as does the teaching of Jesus Christ our Lord. | When the heart is sore with sin, no speech is comforting and sweet, save that which tells of the Lamb of God that takes away the sin of the world. When we enter the solemn mystery of sorrow, and God gives us bread moistened with tears, there is no solace for our pain, save in the sympathy of Him who agonized in Gethsemane. When the portals of eternity are be- ginning to open, there will be no voices to support us save the voice of Him who was dead and is alive again, and who holds in His pierced hands the keys of death. When we think of the teaching of Jesus, it seems as though the veil of the sky were becoming thin, and the glory from the eternal throne were streaming down upon us, and there were echoing in our ears the proclamation of long ago, “This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased; hear ye Him.” As we listen to Him, our consciences become keen of edge to sever between the false and the true, we become strong with power for endeavor and endurance, our minds become enriched with serene views of truth; and we come to live the life of those who know the joyful sound of the voice of God and walk all 86 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? the day in the light of His countenance. Yea, verily, “never man spake like this man.” “Q Love that wilt not let me go, I rest my weary soul in Thee; I give Thee back the life I owe, That in Thine ocean depths its flow May richer, fuller be.” SHALL JESUS FIND FAITH ON EARTH? If. ACCORDING TO TOES PSYCHOLOGY OR RERIGION: or, SOME PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE CHAPTER XI. The seven modern wonders as discerned by certain Cornell University professors some years ago, prompted Professor Charles Gray Shaw, of the University of New York, in a daily paper to suggest a list somewhat different from the one framed by those disciples of exteriority. He presented them as follows: “The sense of selfhood, as it appears in the modern drama, especially that of Ibsen; the esthet- ic revolt against science, as it appears in Nietzsche and the Sym- bolists; the principle of value in the economic and ethical signif- icance; the social drama; music, especially the operas of Wag- ner; voluntaristic psychology, which has reformed rationalism ; interior life, as this is brought out in psychology, and that in a way that psychology itself does not understand.” Professor Shaw’s last wonder he sets forth in the acknowledg- ment that science is unable fully to apply her tests because the soul of man is a conception far beyond her realm, where ex- perience alone dare speak with assurance. Nevertheless it is most interesting to note that modern science does not deny the existence of the soul, and because of this it becomes a new field of endeavor, wherein she must reverently, and perhaps more so than with any other problem, take off her shoes, treading on holy ground, if happily she may find the object of her quest. That science would attempt this, is Professor Shaw’s sixth modern wonder, which he terms “voluntaristic psychology, which 87 88 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? has reformed rationalism.”’ Perhaps the latter clause is super- ficial, and it may be a mere conjecture to assert that the reforma- tion of rationalism needed the world war to break its sway, which it held for more than one hundred years. Yet the first clause is permissible, where the several departments of creation are yield- ing their secrets to the search-light of science, proceeding to illuminate every nook and corner of the labyrinth of the natural and the spiritual world, in things physical, mental and spiritual. She searches for cause and effect, and where possible brings to light the new powers discovered that they may be placed at the disposal of mankind. Somehow modern scientific investigation has now come to a place where it expresses the supposition that the soul is inde- pendent of the material limitations of the body, though manifest- ing its peculiar nature in one way or another through the body. This is indeed a surprising concession, but it is similar to ex- perimentation with ether and electricity, which actually have brought out no definite conceptions. Harnessing these forces to the advantage of mankind have not revealed what they are, for the direct demonstration of the one or the other, at least for the present, is impossible. They may be one and the same, or cause and effect. Just so science and even modern theology are grop- ing in the dark as to what the soul really is. It is not acceptable as some claim, that ether, electricity and the soul, are mere theoretical conceptions, resting only on in- ferences drawn from observation or dogina. There is no reason whatever, why the scientist cannot be impressed as much as any one else by the confession of Socrates, who condemned to death, said to his friends: “If the soul is immortal, then does she stand in want of care, not only during this period which we call life, but for all time, and we may well consider that there is terrible danger in neglecting her. If death indeed were an escape from all things, then were it a great gain to the wicked, for it would be a release from the body and from their own sin and from the soul at the same time; but now, as the soul proves to be immor- Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 89 tal, there is no other escape from evils to come, nor any other safety than in her attaining to the highest virtue and wisdom.” If this remarkable statement be accepted as coming from one whose soul asserted itself in the midst of pagan darkness, know- ing no Saviour, no hope, no immortality with Christian assurance excepting as his faith was instinctive and perfectly natural; if science similarly and as a whole knows nothing of God, revela- tion or immortality, yet perceiving that natural laws must be similar in the spiritual world; and with Sir Oliver Lodge, recent- ly asserting that his investigations with ether and electricity have proven to him the existence of the soul of man because of phenomena which he cannot deny; then science, if she desires, has a right to proceed in her experimentation, trying to establish a basis for belief, calling it the science of psychology, which though separated from other sciences, its method must naturally be introspective rather than objective. Because of certain evidences in recent years we find philos- ophers and so-called specialists in psychology dealing with the nature of the soul of man from many angles, mainly evolution, indescriminately mixing this and that phenomenon, seeking to find its constitution exclusively for science. On this foundation, said Dr. D. Adam, “there is an almost earnest attempt in our day to realize inner strength through the cultivation of one’s self, by the aid of the new psychology. There is an interesting literature growing up around the subject of personal enrichment through the recognition of psychological law. No one who understands it aright can fail to see a great deal of forgotten truth in this most interesting field, so far as it goes. My only objection to it is that it is subjective. It turns one’s thoughts in upon self. It makes personal growth a matter of acute diagnosis, and intro- spection. And consequently it fails of its purpose.” The Christian student, on the other hand, broader in his con- . ceptions, experienced in the revealed will and love of God by sal- vation through Jesus Christ in the inner man, awakened to a nobler consciousness, laboring to aspire with His strength, whose 90 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? “mortal lips, are touched with God’s own truth’s immortal fire” ; or, as Professor Shaw declared, “in a way that psychology it- self does not understand,” reasons objectively, and considers the soul from experience, its moral conditions and possibilities. CHAPTER XII. Bee loibeNA LURE OAND ELEMENTS OR. THE PSY- eriGe LIFE; IMPORTANGE’ OF OUR INSTINCTIVE Mii ArORE OR OUR GRELIGIOUS BEUIEEF:. Psychology as the term implies, is the teaching of the soul in all its powers, activities and possibilities. The student usually be- gins with the question, “What is the soul?” As with philosophy a satisfactory answer can only be reached from the study as a whole. The word “soul,” originally, in the Greek, meant “the breath of life,’ and according to Homer, continued after life in the underworld enveloped in shadows. This vague idea reminds us of the speculations of the learned in all ages, as set forth most tritely by Sir John Davis: “Some her chair up to the brain do earry; Some sink it down into the stomach’s heat; Some place it in the root of life, the heart; Some in the liver, fountain of the veins; Some say, she’s all in all, and all in every part; Some say, she’s not contain’d, but all contains. Thus these great clerks their little wisdom show, While with their doctrines they at hazard play, Tossing their light opinions to and fro, To mock the learn’d, as learn’d in this as they.” How well this illustrates modern “medical materialism,” to which Professor William James, the eminent psychologist refers, when he says, “When they criticise our own exalted soul-flights by calling them ‘nothing but expressions of our own organic dis- position, we feel outraged and hurt, for we know that, what- ever be our organism’s peculiarities, our mental states have their substantive value as revelations of the living truth; and we wish all this medical materialism could be made to hold its tongue. Nothing could be more stupid than to bar out phenomena from our notice merely because we are incapable of taking part in any- thing like them ourselves.” (Varieties Rel. Exp., p. 13, 109). As the soul has very often been claimed to be material, Cicero seems foremost in having entertained the idea that it was similar gI 92 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? to the body with harmonious members, though distinct from the body. Plato distinguished two constituent parts, the mortal and the immortal. The soul being connected with the body naturally would share its actions and changes. In so far as the soul is capable of eternal knowledge and truth, there must be some- thing divine, which Plato terms reason. He also looked upon zeal as the intermediary member between body and soul. Aristotle first declared the soul as the life principle of an organic body; in so far as we ascribe life to plants just so far do we give it soul; the body having only a nourishing soul, thereby grows and propagates itself. The soul of the brute has only the power of nourishment and propagation, together with a sense of feeling through which it discerns its likes and dislikes. The hu- man soul not only nourishes and feels but thinks. The soul therefore is the foundation and dynamic power of all the ac- tivities of a human being, the principle of bodily and spiritual ites This view places the soul in a position where it does not exist for itself alone but for the body as well. We cannot conceive of a soul except it be connected with the body. What is the re- lationship? Every observation is the same as the Greeks taught, that the soul is the governor or life principle of the body, that it has no particular habitation, penetrating every part and making the members what they are; for it is the soul that looks out of the eyes, hears through the ears, smells through the nostrils; is the dynamic power of the muscles without which the organs and members are lifeless. It is the unifying power by which the whole is bound together. All life proceeds through organisms; all organisms consist of cells, the smallest and simplest elements of these are readily seen in the dissection of an organism, proving a living unity in a living plurality. In bringing this mechanism under closest scruti- ny, we find that it does not consist of members so much as bodies which are outwardly brought together as a whole. This Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 93 mechanism must then be put in operation at will, and then again become immovable, as desired. Thus far, the soul is the shaping, life giving and governing power of the human organism. Under this term we understand the cause of action, though the power itself may not be sensibly felt, yet the motion is evident. We must also not readily con- clude that the soul steps into the body from without as it sud- denly disappears in death. The body is what it is through the soul, working and appointing its development to the extent where it can be said that the body is the visible substance of the in- visible soul; it is the product of the soul. Consequently the soul is the primary element which exists as the life of the body. As such we stand before an astonishing phenomenon similar to all God’s creation. As little as we can determine the soul’s beginning, just so are we unable to discern the foundation of life. The sharpest reasoning must here confess that we stand before the inconceivable, where we can only know that it is an act of God worthy of admiration and praise. All the ingenuity of psychologists focussed upon life could not satis- factorily define it. All we may know is that it is something working from within. Our observation can then only say that life is a motive power needing certain conditions for exertion, possessing the fountain of action, nourishing itself from this inner force, existing, mov- ing and propagating itself accordingly. What more can be said than that this essence is the divine in all life, for it is God who works unceasingly in all His creatures, “in Whom we live and move and have our being.” Finite beings however, with their so-called knowledge, have dared to deny the Infinite, philosophically lifting tangible things to almighty power. It is thus that a materialistic atheism de- clares the soul merely as the effect of the body, as the product of living tissues. It claims the material atom immortal, that all life is but an attribute of the material, the soul an expression of the body. 94 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? On the other hand “spiritism,’ wrongly called “spiritualism,” is directly opposed to materialism, laying no weight whatever on the visibility of things. Hiding its deluding and tricking sa- tanic motives, it claims that the body is a prison house, wherein the soul is chained, ignoring the fact that the Divine Will created the body intending it the temple of the Holy Ghost; which is a nobler conception. There are two fundamental activities of the soul which be- gin at birth and without which there is no life. The one is sensa- tion, often termed feeling, and the other instinct, sometimes called desire, which is the basis of what we feel, hear, see, taste or smell. These are life processes of the soul. Sensation means the distinguishing between what is agreeable and disagreeable; in- stinct is the effort to attain the agreeable and warding off the disagreeable, sometimes discerning prematurely. It is the effect- ual working of sensation, and where the unity of both is seen. Taken together, they form the one great fundamental basis of mankind, called receptivity; whilst instinct alone, is a striving from within outward, sometimes called the faculty of the will. The soul thus proves itself from the beginning as possessing the principle of feeling, perceiving and desiring. This sense per- ception is at the same time the spirit, the ability to discern, think and act consciously, whereby the soul becomes a free personality, wherein God’s image is revealed. Instinctively 'then man is a religious being, whether he believes in the Triune God or not. Savages have been discovered who seemingly had lost all credulity in gods, ghosts or demons. Nevertheless this does not mean that they had lost all capacity for God. Instinctively men have always believed in Him how- ever low they may have fallen. With this peculiar faculty man stands alone upon the mountain-top searching through space for the Absolute. Socrates thus exclaimed, “I consider how I shall present my soul whole and undefiled before the Judge on that day. Renouncing the honors at which the world aims, I desire Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 95 only to know the truth, and to live as well as I can, and when the time comes, to die.” In whatever degree of intelligence men may have exerted themselves, from the savage barbarian to the civilized thinker, it is evident that they knew “the judgment of God,” and that they were “a law unto themselves.” “O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God; how unsearchable are His judgments, and His ways past finding out.” The soul of man then, is the principle of the body and the germ for the development of the larger life. Both are bound to- gether in one indivisible unity, which explains the phenomenon that the soul is bound to the body and influences it until the body ceases to perform its functions. Thus to know, or knowledge, and the will are inseparable, we divided them only in thought, be- cause we can in no other way distinguish them. We discern then only two fundamental faculties of the human soul, the receptive, or faculty of sensibility, and the reactionary, or power of the will, On the relationship of these two fundamental powers then de- pend what are called the temperaments, whereby we understand the ruling disposition of a person. Since Hippocrates and Galenus, in the second century after Christ, we distinguish four temperaments: the sanguine, the melancholic, the phlegmatic and the choleric. In the sanguine, the receptive disposition predomi- nates onesided; here is seen a susceptibility for most anything, a judgment formed from outward circumstances, serenity and gaiety, but also a deficiency in stability and concentration. Fickle- ness and thoughtlessness characterize this temperament, which predominates in childhood. The reverse is seen in the reactionary disposition which rules onesided with the melancholic; its action is preeminently directed toward spiritual things. This peculiarity is found in the lack of susceptibility for the outer world, living only on inner, or spir- itual things. It is the temperament of thinkers, philosophers, theologians, mystics, poets and artists. The tendency to with- draw from the world often tends toward dejectedness, and in 96 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? many instances suicide, where the individual has reached either the stage of agnosticism or insanity. In the phlegmatic disposition is recognized one not easily aroused to feeling and action; cold, calm, sluggish; as the term implies, full of phlegm; not impressed, indifferent, selfish, which if allowed full reign, will end in catastrophe. Such men are as uncertain as a clogged weather-vane, having no appreciation of things unseen or eternal. Great men, intellectually, some of them; but, although they appear in the haunts of men, they are dead “at the top,” “atrophied,” “The wretch of both worlds: for so mean a sum, First starved in this, then damned in that to come.” With the choleric temperament ‘the receptive and reactionary powers are found in a high degree, receptive for most anything and evenly productive. It is the disposition of the world’s few men who have labored successfully in the transformation of con- ditions for the better in history and society; prophets, apos- tles, reformers and statesmen. The temperaments cannot how- ever be altogether fully recognized, for the natural disposition with individuals as with nations, through education, culture and experience, as well as through the power of ‘the will, become very modified, and according to God’s intent should be so modified. Here the understanding is a prime factor for self-control, the climatic stage in which our thinking powers develop themselves, whereby we attain knowledge. The lowest rung of knowledge is the contemplation of an ob- ject attained by meditation through the five senses. In them- selves the senses do not perceive, but the spirit through them attains knowledge. Under the senses we here understand bodily organs which animals altogether use to nourish themselves and hold the body intact. With man however they not only do this, but also take up impressions from the outer world, and the world beyond. Through the sense of touch we get an impression of feeling. The activity of this sense is mechanical, through which Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 97 we learn the attributes of certain objects, such as hardness, soft- ness, roughness, smoothness, solidity, liquidity, whether things are cold, lukewarm or hot. The activity of the tasting and smelling organs depend on a chemical process through which we assimilate certain objects. That which does not permit itself to be dissolved through saliva we cannot taste, and what cannot be reduced to an atmospheric condition we cannot smell; both senses are primarily needed for the nourishment of the body, and we therefore term them material senses, in contrast with the theoretical, as seeing and hearing, which are used to discern things dynamic. Both can only take up something through light and air. The senses then are the agencies through which every discernment from without enters the body as well as the soul; for, with the ear we take up sounds and the thoughts of others as they express them vocally, and with the eyes what is written. If something impresses the soul and body passively, that action is called feeling. It is not exact- ly the consciousness of something subjective nor objective. What is only in the feeling has not yet become an object of our think- ing, concentration of the mind is first needed. Thus here again is seen the inseparable unity of all the powers of the soul. As long as I only feel a sensation I cannot speak of it, because I have not yet made it an object of thought; but, as soon as I con- ceive what it is in thought, concentration is active, for all the senses are focussed upon the object. The disappearance of representations once held by the mind is termed “forgetting” ; the return of forgotten representations, “re- membrance.” This then is designated as the power of rep- resentation; but as specific activities of the mind they are called imagination and memory. Under imagination we understand the power of faculty where- by the mind creates pictures, ofttimes of things never seen, yet sensitive to the mind. Memory on the other hand is that power whereby signs, names and figures of objects or persons are pic- tured by the mind and formed into thoughts and words. To 98 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? memorize means the concentration of the mind on the retention or intended words, thoughts and objects for the purpose of hold- ing them fast, achieved easiest when these in written form are ordered according to the rule of rhythm. The productive power of imagination we term fancy or phan- tasy; it is a soul faculty peculiar to poets and artists through which they are enabled to picture in words or on canvas their inmost thoughts and give them sensible form. Here beauty is best illustrated, which is first created in the mind by phantasy. Beautiful we term that phenomenon which agreeably penetrates our spirits so that we understand and enjoy it. Three distinc- tions of the beautiful are evident: all things beautiful must be phenomena that are picturesque, conceivable and _ sensible. Poetry pictures in well sounding words and rhythm thoughts that were first idealized in the mind of the poet. Plato claimed that the beautiful must be expressed in spiritual language, without which it can only be vain ostentation. The sensible and the spiritual accordingly must so intermingle that they cannot be distinguished one from another. It is a wrong conception to think the poet or artist received the thought spontaneously and then put it into sensible form in order to bring it into exhibition; where this is noticed, poetry and art are cold and inanimate. Yet it is peculiar to the poetic or artistic mind to create such forms in which the original and complete unity of body and soul are bound together. The essential peculiarity of the beautiful is its direct work- ing upon the mind. It pleases as soon as seen or heard though we may not immediately perceive the cause. The sensible in the beautiful then naturally turns toward the senses, and since these are intimately bound with the spiritual, our souls are stirred. A work of art must first be studied before it can be appreciated. The beauty of nature in which divine thoughts stand out be- fore us physically must be considered in the same manner. The senses then are faculties with which we perceive the beautiful indirectly and without the interpretation of a logical understand- Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 99 ing. From-this conception of the beautiful one can readily see the peculiar activity of the imagination and understanding. Imagination and memory are therefore closely related because they need each other for support, the former tending toward a conceivable object in view, whilst the latter is directed toward the abstract. On the other hand, by understanding is meant the activity of the thinking mind which no longer is directed toward a picture or outward form of an object, but focussed upon its inner being, which cannot be perceived through the senses. When I take hold upon this inner thing or object with my mind I create thoughts; thoughts therefore are products of the mind directed toward the inner being of an object; this essence of things taken up in its whole determination we term conception or idea of a thing, and therefore define the understanding also as the ability to form ideas. | There is a vast difference between a representation and an idea. The child mind has a representation of a table; but a thorough development is necessary in order to form an idea of the object. This difference is illustrated by our Lord when He exclaimed, “Having eyes, see ye not? and having ears, hear ye not? and do ye not remember?’ (Mark 8:18). In a higher degree this is true in reference to the most difficult ideas of beauty, thought and life, not generally grasped, although most people can superficially tell what is beautiful, what is life, and thereby claim they are thinking. What then is the psychological explanation? The develop- ment of ideas, judgments and conclusions naturally proves them properties of the understanding. Understanding in this sense is similarly important with reason or mind. If with reason I realize the character of an object, such recognition is termed ob- jective thought, wherein my mind is in harmony with the ob- ject toward which I am thinking. A subjective thought lays hold only on one side or part of the object; such subjective conceptions are also termed opinion and 100 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? personal view; naturally here develop diverse opinions of the same object which offer many sides for contemplation. All knowledge begins with views and opinions. Out of the conflict, which is in the nature of philosophical development, objective knowledge results, at the conclusion of which the philosophical terminus of reason and being are found to be identical. It is here for instance that we think God’s thoughts after Him, from whom all being went forth. As there is this correspondence between thinking and being, things of themselves cannot determine thoughts as to mentally illustrate an idea, but the things or ob- ject can be determined by thought and set forth verbally. Only in the fact that man possesses understanding can there come to him consciousness and self-consciousness. Conscious- ness implies to know; but to know also implies having taken something into the mind. Consciousness 1s the general expres- sion for knowing and observing that which takes place within and without the soul. Possessing consciousness, we know what we think and desire, and reason from these; and he that is un- conscious can still be living, yet is unable to take up a thought or recognize what is proceeding. Consciousness, generally speaking, distinguishes man from all lower creatures. Upon the distinguishing faculty of the mind depend all thought and judgment; the thought of a child here begins to distinguish objects; but also thought scientific and philo- sophic here begins with distinguishing and definition. With consciousness then begin all thought and the recognition of ob- jects. Self-consciousness, on the other hand, consists in the mind making itself the object of thought, placing itself in contrast or opposition to outward circumstances. Complete self-conscious- ness, though it disregards all other things, yet recognizes the fact of a world, God and mankind, and a relationship to these as a whole. Since the period of Immanuel Kant, (1724-1804), there has been a distinguishing in philosophical thought between intellect, Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 101 judgment and reason; when discerned, which is not general, in- tellect is designated as the lower, but judgment and reason the higher powers. Intellect is then defined as the faculty through which we build ideas by reflection and reach the abstract. The power to form judgments, which is the agreement or disagree- ment between ideas, and. reason, which is the arrangement of ideas and judgments according to the laws of logic, are faculties which must be distinguished. While the intellect recognizes the character of created objects, reason on the other hand considers the relationship between the finite and the Infinite, unconditioned in itself as the absolute, the final proof of all being and thinking as it exists in God. Here is recognized the chief end of man, to glorify God and enjoy Him forever. Only as he seeks the truth is the man at his best. To be truly religious he must seek to form the highest conception of God possible, imperfect under the dispensation of the Law, permissible however in the light of revelation from the appearance of Jesus Christ our Lord during nineteen centuries of marvelous grace. In this supreme purpose, in which the will of man and the grace of God are combined, man cannot be de- ceived, unless he denies the object of his being. Here skepticism proves its own contradiction; for, if the mind can know nothing, then it cannot accept what it is able to know. It would not only set aside all philosophy, but lead to the most ab- ject materialism and indifference, as if the noblest power of man, to think and to know, were mere illusions. However, skepticism, by its destructive criticism has earned some appreciation in that it has shown in certain periods wherein it erred and overlooked the truth, and very often aroused men from a corrupting secur- ity. In such instances where it has stepped in and proven what is truth, it has reasoned in direct opposition to its own premises. The positive Christan however, knows the truth with as- surance, because he is not only so destined, but to him it is re- vealed. Although his knowledge has its limitations on account of finite inability to completely grasp the infinite nature of God, 102 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? His greatness, power and holiness, it is necessary that the will be brought into harmony with the understanding in order to focus the whole being upon that of God. The will is a great mystery, and is intimately attached to the human personality. While knowledge is a taking up of that which lies outside, all desire and will consist in an outward striv- ing and going forth of the soul. The activity of both these fundamental forces allow themselves to be distinguished. All feeling, perception, observation, comprehension, reflection, learn- ing, investigation, thinking, knowing, judgments and conclu- sions, belong to the power of the understanding. On the other hand, all desire, striving, wishing, yearning, demanding, hope, fear, love, hate, all that is termed good and evil, decrees and purposes, belong to the power of the will. Conscience here also exerts itself as the direct knowing of what is right and wrong, being conscious of the omnipotence of a right- eous and holy God. It is from this that man often feels himself destined to do what he knows he ought to do. In the conscious- free-will then, lies the actual being, dignity and nobility of man, the energizing center of his personality. If we permit the superiority of the will, we cannot however afford conclusions to the disadvantage of the understanding. Somehow knowledge and will must be harmoniously bound to- gether, possible in religious faith, the “sixth sense,” generally un- known, and therefore undeveloped. Faith here objectively takes in the whole of man’s being, as much of his thinking and know- ing powers as his will and aspirations. Faith enables us to trust where we cannot fully see to reason conclusively, to believe where we cannot fully comprehend. With assurance, it is the greatest thing in the world. Faith is not, merely a blind trust in an unknown quantity, but a wise judgment made about certain factors, based upon the abundant facts and evidence that are the foundations of those factors. Faith craves for higher knowledge and powers. If merely in- tellectual, a conservative orthodoxy develops. If merely emo- Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 103 tional, it becomes mysticism and fanaticism. If developed only by the will pietism and salvation by good works as doctrines pre- dominate. True faith is the indwelling work of the Holy Spirit of God by virtue of the covenant of grace, which accepts, receives and rests upon Him alone for justification, sanctification and eternal life. | Thus in bringing all our dissected parts of the soul together, we find that it is the God implanted, creating, shaping, animating, governing, thinking, understanding, desiring and willing power of man, which as a unit makes him what he is and inspires him in his aspiration toward the Absolute Ideal. It is the immortal germ out of which grow the manifold powers that control the mind and body, which, though constituted differently, and often contradictory, yet objectively form a unit. As a living, immortal personality then, man is not only the image of God, but the crown of His creation, that is, when he comes to complete con- sciousness of his condition and divine purpose, recognizing and helping to fulfil the plan of God in the Redeemer of the world, in Whom he attains completest joy and satisfaction. CHAPTER XIII. 2) THE EMOTIONS IN RELIGIOUS LIFE; EMOTION- AL PROGRESSION AS* REVEALED BY THE Vib Dee OF FEAR AND AWE TO REVERENCE, ADMIRATION, GRATITUDE AND TENDERNESS. Peculiar is the fact that our stern fathers and mothers feared the feelings. The Puritan husband dared not praise his wife, and together they withheld all approbation lest the child be spoiled. They coerced their lips into silence, hid their tears of joy in moments when the heart overflowed with pride over the success of son or daughter. They rather died than betray their emotions. However, we have learned the value and importance of feel- ing through experience and observation, and to begin with, we would simply define emotion as any strong perturbation of the soul either pleasurable or painful that excites the mind, and may be looked upon as thought in sudden glow. On the feelings are based the whole philosophy of life in conjunction with the in- tellect, judgment, conscience and will. The suppression of the emotions has proven that man may know many things, least of all himself. The temple of Diana may long be in ruins, but its portal inscription, “KNOW THYSELF” stands forth embla- zoned above its silent arches as a message to beings little con- cerned about it. Dr. John H. Jowett said, “There is nothing more frail and tender than fine emotion. If we act upon it immediately it ac- quires a rare robustness, and it perpetuates itself in the soul in the form of strength. But if a fine emotion be dallied with, or neglected, or deferred, it speedily faints and dies. I suppose that of all delicate things the most delicate is an emotion which prompts a man to a noble life. We can‘crush it as easily as we can crush a snow-drop. We can quench it more easily than we can blow out a candle. And the fearful thing about it is this— 104 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 105 that in order to kill it we do not need to do it violent and de- liberate outrage; we have only to neglect it and it will probably die in an hour. In these realms delay is spiritual murder. “When a certain man procrastinated with his great emotion he was really making an alliance with death. When he proposed delay he was on the way to spiritual suicide. His fine emotion was the gift of lfe—‘“Lord I will follow Thee.” His pro- crastination was the minister of death,—‘Suffer me first to go and bid farewell to them that are at home.” The Lord Jesus Christ knew that while the man was away on the farewell mission the heavenly impulse would die; the man would never return, for on the way the spiritual angel would be slain. Pro- crastination is something far worse than the thief of time, it is the murderer of spiritual infants, it is the murderer of the heav- enly impulses that are born in the womb of the soul. And so here is the teaching for you and me. The Master is solemnly urging and emphasizing the supreme delicacy of a noble impulse, and the imminent peril which attends delay. And surely the warning is as relevant to you and me as to the man to whom it was first spoken, and it has immediate application to pressing ex- periences in our own life.” From this sermon on the frailty of fine emotion we learn that one can hardly know himself unless he uses the emotions to ad- vantage, and especially those of fear and awe, as they should yield to reverence, admiration and tenderness, which belong to the law of instant resolution. These are the rungs of Jacob’s ladder, the soul’s opportunity whereon it climbs toward the sublime by faith in the world’s Redeemer. If some selfish, evil motive, assert itself by temptation, and entice the soul instead toward the precipice, one should heed the warning to halt and think before the fall. When fear and awe are aroused and grace divine lures upward as with the patriarch, the soul should act resolutely. Much is given the soul to control the emotions, to concentrate them upon the great activities of life, until it is swept toward the 106 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? haven where love is perfect. A metaphysician recently in a lec- ture discussed what he termed “the aura,” wherein he declared, that “every man is encircled by a golden sheen, which is the radiation of the soul.” What he no doubt meant refers to the outward expression of the emotions, as for instance seen on the face of Stephen the Martyr. It is that which affects our judg- ment of the man; takes from him or adds to him in our estima- tion; speaks to us before he opens his mouth, magnifies or mini- mizes him in our eyes. It is actually something which cannot be suppressed, because it is the man himself. It is not his words, what he has been, or in- tends to be: it is the essence of the man himself now. If full of fear and terror, it cannot be mistaken. He can be read like an open book. Soul fear, because of conviction of sin, is the experience of every human being, some time or another. In due time its presence is felt, and no man can escape the conflict or increase the probability of personal victory by living in thoughtless op- position and forgetfulness. It is vain to cover up the stern features of the great destroyer. This is not conquering our foe; it is merely looking upon him with one eye wilfully closed.. The strength of sin is the law, the principle of moral gravitation, which involves that the life which has failed here, will fail here- after. ‘“‘Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall be also reap.” Voltaire, the French atheist, in fear of death exclaimed to his physician, “I will give you half of what I am worth if you will give me six months of life.” Hobbs the infidel philosopher and erudite author of “Leviathan,” closed his day by saying, “If I had the whole world to dispose of, I would give it to live one day.” Thomas Paine, the great American skeptic, in the agony of his soul cried out upon his death-bed, “It is hell to be alone.” How terrible these last words of noted unbelievers, wherewith they veritably cursed the day they were born, when they saw looming up before them the memories of the past as they were about to face judgment for the deeds of the body. “How are Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 107 they brought into desolation, as in a moment. They are utterly consumed with terrors.” There is no power that can hush the voice of conscience labor- ing in opposition to the extended help of a merciful God. Wealth cannot help. “Wherefore should I die, being so rich ?’—groaned Cardinal Beaufort upon his death couch.—‘If the whole realm would save my life, I am able either by policy to get it, or by wealth to buy it. Will not death be bribed? Wi§ll money do nothing?” And with that echo of the word “nothing,” so ex- pressive of the truth, his spirit took its flight. Earthly power avails nothing. King Louis XI, was filled with such craven fear that he forbade the mentioning of death in his presence, especially in his last illness. The exclamation of Queen Elizabeth, “The half of my kingdom for an hour of time,” has passed into history. Secular knowledge gives no ad- vantage. William Pope, the learned skeptic groaned upon his death-bed, “My damnation is sealed.”” Also philosophy here fails like thin ice beneath the feet of the unwary traveler. Newport was a philosopher, but his arguments failed him in the end. “What argument,” he exclaimed, “is there against matters of fact? Whence this war in my heart? Wretch that I am, whither shall I flee from this breast? That there is a God I know, be- cause I continually feel the effect of His wrath; that there is a hell, I am equally certain, having an earnest of my inheritance there already in my breast.” Religious fear accordingly, when produced by just apprehensions of Divine righteousness, natural- ly overlooks all human greatness that stands in competition with it, and extinguishes every other terror. On the other hand, if emotional progression toward the light sets in, fear of the consequence of sin yields to awe, or a min- gling of fear and reverence. The soul is constrained by repentance and profound respect toward a reverential fear. It is awed by the merciful presence of God. His grace here renews and re- stores the action of the inward life and sets it in motion toward an upward grade, and with all its power counteracts sin and 108 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? death, developing true reverence, admiration, gratitude and ten- derness, creating an exertive influence for good toward God and men. The emotions never overflow effectively for the better until the soul is filled with the Holy Spirit. When a cup is filled, it is ready to overflow. When a soul is filled with some big aim, a fine desire, some lofty absorbing passion, then it overflows and pours down into the world in true beneficence. What we need today is large-hearted men who despise narrowness as an un- pardonable and preventable sin; men who are willing to break down the narrow walls that shut them in at their daily tasks and allow the big God-like things that live in them to have free scope: men like Moses, Paul, Savonarola, Luther and Moody, filled with the Spirit Divine. Some great preacher recently emphasized the fact that we do no harm to anchor a balloon to the earth; it is man’s plaything, and whether it lies low to earth, or soars into the upper air, it is of little consequence. But chain a mountain eagle like a dog in a barnyard, and it is a different thing entirely. That is life born for upper altitudes. Now you bind a sky-thing to earth. You are holding in check soaring instincts. You are keeping down that which by every known quality of wing and passion ought to be up. It is working against divine endowments, against native, age-old inheritances to keep the eagle out of the clouds. Just so men who live all their working hours at their earthly occupations or professions within the narrow confines of the shop, office or study, are men who chain the eagle, hungry for the sky, to the earth. The wings of their emotions are clipped whereby they are doubly handicapped. We are not placing a premium on star gazing, or encouraging the visionary, who feels that he is wasting time working at busi- ness for which he is paid, and who ought, as he thinks, be liv- ing in some beautiful, undefiled atmosphere with his soul. But we do mean that a man who lives only in the things he does day by day as an automaton, is chaining his soul to a stake in the Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 109 earth while it yearns to rise to a higher standard. A full free soul only can overflow. Also, this is impossible unless it be filled with the richest personality. We know what it is to meet with those whose free emotions and beauty of character are highly esteemed. Though human yet they thrilled us with the mystery of their dignity, their rare delicate sympathy and natural charm: what noble example of Christliness, as they follow Him. Every soul in this transitory state possesses an ideal of what it would like to be. The loftier and nobler the ideal, the more Christ- like it becomes, growing in grace and the knowledge of the truth as it is in Christ Jesus, a practical witness of the power and glo- ry of God. Where the emotions are controlled and developed for this end, there is not only the assurance of divine grace, but divine power will dynamically inspire the soul and through it the souls of others toward the love of moral and immortal beauty. It is the example of such Christ-inspired, in-breathed souls, with their tremendous influence for good that cannot be overestimated. It shines with radiant beauty like some bright serene star guiding with the glory of its light the footsteps of wanderers lest perad- venture they stumble in the night. We go to the roots to fertilize a tree; we must go to the heart to enrich the emotions. It is the life that resides there that points the man to wide horizons and makes life a golden opportunity for service. No personality ever existed which exerted its influence in any contagious, effective way, that did not have a rich, sanctified heart-life filled with reverence, gratitude and tenderness. The biography of Dwight Lyman Moody is no doubt exceptional, without book-learning, without money, with- out the things that glitter and amaze society, yet his personal- ity, filled with the Spirit of God, reaped the fruits of saving grace. The thing that went out from him and laid a spell on two continents was a holy passion for the saving and the serving of his fellowmen. He was larger than his shoe business, though 110 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? he made that great. He worked, as some one said, with his head and hands, but lived in his heart. This instance proves that no man can ever make complete and effective use of his personality until his life is surcharged with that divine love for man that filled the heart of Christ, that sent Him void of books, money and political power through the world of needy men, the world’s greatest Benefactor, and then sent Him in an act of supreme devotion to men, to the Cross of Cal- vary. The emotions of our religious life should therefore breathe out holiness. St. Peter says, “As He which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation.” Anything set apart unto God is holy. It does not necessarily imply sinlessness. It does mean however, that he is not under the domination and power of sin. He is not fashioning himself according to the maxims of this world, but through the power of God and His Christ. Is this practical for the world in which we live? It is so urged because it is practical. In His High Priestly Prayer, our Lord prayed, “I pray not that Thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that Thou shouldest keep them from the evil.” We thus are to meet evil not by a change of locality, but by a rein- forcement of the Spirit. As we meet disease by abounding health so we are to meet evil by the very overflow of moral health thoroughly spiritualized. How well this is illustrated in “The Mighty Music Master,” by James Leroy Stockton: “We read life’s music from a hidden score Unwinding slowly, and can only see The note the Moment gives us. Joyously And full of hope we voice it, or heartsore, And praying, we may sing it nevermore. We cannot hear the perfect symphony, God hears. Its faultless blended melody Is drowned for us in what ourselves out-pour. Fear not the notes writ in the scroll for you A Mighty Musie Master made each strain Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 111 To suit the voice that was to sing it through. The majors and the minors each are best, The burst of joy or tremolo of pain, And in each score God writes at last a rest.” Religious emotional progression is perhaps best seen in the lighted face, which is as near as we shall ever get to seeing the soul, it is as nearly visible now as it ever will be here. A stanza quoted from Fanny Crosby’s hymn, “Rescue the Perishing,” in a year book of the McAuley Mission in New York City evidences the wonders there performed night after night, transforming many lives that otherwise seemed hopeless: “Down in the human heart crushed by the tempter, Feelings lie buried that grace can restore; Touched by a loving heart, wakened by kindness, Chords that were broken will vibrate once more.” Their faces shine as they tell the wondrous story of their re- demption, as they now find themselves in line with all the host of God’s children, waiting for the unveiling of the Divine Artist’s Masterpiece, the greatest painting creation ever looked upon since the morning stars sang together: the picture of the unveiled sons of God. Then shall be seen the full glory of the emotions in the consummation of the Church. But, when shall appear in us the dazzling outshining of Him who hath called us unto nothing less than His eternal glory? Plainly, at His coming. And how quickly will this mighty mir- acle of glorification be wrought? As swift as the passage of the lightning flash across the heavens shall be His advent. And in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, shall follow the marvel of the resurrection of God’s children. In that instant the Divine Artist’s Masterpiece shall be unveiled, in that instant earth’s graves shall burst asunder, and ravaged of their contents, shall yield in incorruptible glory the bodies which went down into them in corruption. A great army has been assaulting the works of the enemy all the long weary day. Time and again has it been hurled back in bloody defeat, until shattered, bleeding, yet undaunted, it has 112 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? fallen upon the twilight field amid the foeman’s shouts of victory. But imagine at midnight the heavens opened in swift vision of a descending, celestial leader, the silence broken by a resounding shout, and the whole, vast host of slaughtered heroes leaping into radiant life, and advancing with shouts of victory on a flee- ing, terrified foe. Even thus, for myriads of years have the dauntless hosts of God’s children been assailing the strongholds of evil, battling for the right, manifested, like their Master, to destroy the works of the devil, until their wearied bodies have yielded to the last enemy, death, and gone down into the grave. But suddenly, in one swift intense moment, the jubilee moment of the waiting centuries, the descending Lord Himself shall shout; up from the quiet valley, from sunlit hillsides, from vil- lage burying ground, from the yawning depths of the sea, from distant battle-fields, where Christian patriots have laid down their lives, from the jungles of India, from the swamps of Africa, from the islands of the sea, from every lonely spot where His followers have passed away in suffering and service, shall the glorified, radiant host spring up like pyramids of flame to meet their coming Lord. What a vision for tear stained eyes; what hope for waiting hearts; what a spur to lagging service! It is related that on the coast of Scotland there is a high rock projecting into the sea. On the top of a conical beacon there is a lantern so arranged that from it every night there streams a light which is seen by fishermen far and wide. Yet there is no need of a keeper, for the reason that there is no burning lamp to fill and trim. It is a lighthouse without a lamp. The explana- tion is that on another island some distance off there is a light- house, and from a window in the tower a stream of light is pro- jected on a mirror in the lantern on the summit of the rock. These rays are reflected to an arrangement of prisms, and by their action are converged to a focus outside the lantern, from which they diverge in the necessary direction. Thus the Christian looks into the transfigured face of Jesus Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 113 Christ and catches something of that wonderful radiance as the lantern mirror reflects the original light. There is such a thing as face answering to face, the joyous light reflected toward another ; there is such a thing as letting the light of the coun- tenance shine upon a fellow mortal in distress. Each one of us is a candle or a lantern to someone who trusts us, and the measure of light we shed is the degree of our trustworthiness. Not what we bring in our hands, but the radiant light we shed around us is our excuse for living. The glow of the soul may be a lantern to some one, tempest-tossed, adrift, without oar, sail or anchor, toward the haven of safety. The emotions cultivated into the radiant life can be as real a thing as sunlight. To neither beast, bird or fish has been given a face with a light behind it. That light is the Redeemer’s mark of favor, separating us from all other creatures. The Christian life makes such a personality possible. It brings to young and old, rich and poor, the noblest conceptions in which the emotions are not only involved but de- veloped through the quickening power of the Holy Spirit. “Though time thy bloom is stealing, There’s still beyond his art, The wild-flower wreath of feeling, The sunbeam of the heart.” CHAPTER XIV. 3) SUGGESTIBILITY. THEORY OF HYPNOTIC PHE- NOMENON; NORMAL AND ABNORMAL SUGGESTI- BILITY. DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REVIVALS OF THE PAST AND REVIVAL MEETINGS OF TODAY. The word ‘ego,’ so generally used in modern language, was first introduced from the Latin by Rene’ Descartes, (1596-1650 A. D.), a French mathematician, and sometimes called the father of modern philosophy. The word has since developed into other meanings according to theories with which it was connected. In philosophy it has reference to mind and body. In metaphysics it means the actual being of a man without the mentioning of the mind or soul. In modern psychology the ego represents the “subject” of a conscious act or state, which in substance can be richly and fully presented, but poorly indeed as to contents. In connection with this, psychologists have observed what they term “subconsciousness,’ whereby they mean the existence of a “double ego,” or double consciousness. For instance, the sudden recollection of something we tried to recall with all our might for some time. Like automatons and without presence of mind we often wind a watch or clock before retiring. Some instances have come to light where a person could add figures during a lively debate, or present philosophical premises and conclusions without premeditation in a heated argument. It is possible to dream the same dream the same night and continue it on another night. According to modern psychology, hypnotism seems the strong- est proof for the existence of the subconscious self, claiming through psychic or bodily means that almost any person can be hypnotized, directed at will, and where it is startlingly evidenced that the organs of motion and sense are not harmonious, but vary in their functions toward each other, and also where a part of the faculties are artificially asleep while others remain awake, 114 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? ES and more awake than usual. Through suggestion the subject can be directed to do foolish and even criminal acts, and illusions and hallucinations are common. Post-hypnotic suggestion however, is considered the most singular phenomenon, wherein the subject is commanded to do something after three days or even weeks, which is claimed to have been done, and if it be a second hypnotic experience, do what he did in the first stage. Something wrong can be sug- gested and then rectified under the same spell. He can be sug- gested into complete aphasia, when whole life periods can be wiped off from the slate of his memory. He will even imagine himself some one else, man or beast, and imitate their charac- teristics. It is however here not said that the subject is a mere automa- ton, for his understanding works quickly and correctly, proving that unconsciousness is out of the question. The theory is that the hypnotic state is an artificial sleep wherein the subject is in sympathetic relationship, not with himself but with the hypnotist, and can be recalled at his will. The mysticism of hypnotism how- ever disappears when, for example, in general experience we are reminded of conditions that are parallel manifestations. It is common to accept suggestions from others, even as a conjurer with a pocket handkerchief controls the sense of vision of one or many persons. And where there is no so-called “medium,” people often laugh, cry, sing and walk in dreams. Rapport, or sympathetic relationship is noticeable between betrothed, friends, mother and child. Body, mind and soul disturbances are common, where the subconscious self is asserted. This perhaps accounts for the one-sidedness of so much of humanity in its neglect of the soul, a condition out of control, according to St. Paul, when he declared, “For we know that the law is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin. For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not: but what I hate, that I do. If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. Now then it is no more I that do 116 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? it, but sin that dwelleth in me. For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me: but how to perform that which is good I find not. For the good that 1 would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. For I delight in the law of God after the inward man: but I see another law in my mem- bers, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death.” (Rom. 7:14-24). Sin then has mesmerized the soul of man to the extent that it is not its own master, not even over the body, which therefore is but onesidedly awake and subject to abnormal suggestion. Dr. Amos R. Wells claims of certain persons that “somebody or something hypnotized them at the start. Possibly it was a fasci- nating ‘teacher, to whose specialty they gave themselves up, body and soul. Possibly it was a book, to whose ideas they became such stupid and absolute converts that no other ideas were hence- forth admitted to their minds. Possibly it was a taste, a fancy, a whim, indulged in blindly until it became supreme. Whatever it was, the subject is no longer his own, but thinks and feels, hears and sees, at the mere suggestion of this teacher, or book, or taste, habit of life, all the time believing that he is his own master, and scorning the insinuation that his mind and soul are another’s.” (Art of Ill, p. 89). In like manner modern “fads and isms” are cropping out every- where which are simply stagnated philosophies of the past, only in new garbs, wherein they suggest the realization of inner strength through so-called culture. They are false teachings which testify to their own inadequacy: the wickedness of so-called “Christian Science,’ the worthlessness of so-called “New Thought,” and the lie of so-called “Spiritualism.” No doubt this “trinity of Satan’s religions’’ have developed “many forgotten Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 117 truths which thereby have been recaptured,” but they are couched in false premises to lead astray the very elect, to whom is given the admonition to “avoid profane and vain babblings and op- positions of science falsely so-called: which some professing have erred concerning the faith.”’ (1 Tim. 6:20-21). These arch deceivers are simply using the methods of the sophists of the fourth and fifth centuries before the Christian era, who were defined by Aristotle, in the singular, as “an im- postrous pretender to knowledge, a man who employs what he knows to be fallacy, for the purpose of deceit and getting money.” And since the existence and power of Satan have become most unfashionable beliefs in our day, while teachings that would philosophize sin, Christ and God out of the world are common, it is no wonder that our times are so filled with political, moral and religious restlessness. It is a world peril supported by all types of radical, revolutionary reformers, who claim there is no relief from economic evils except in a universal paralysis. They protest against every existing form of government, both civil and ecclesiastical, but are blind to a description of their condition in the book of Proverbs, (14:12), “There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death.” “WHO blights the bloom of the land today With the fiery breath of hell? If the Devil isn’t, and never was, won’t Somebody rise and tell? The Devil is voted not to be, And of course the thing is true, But WHO is doing the kind of work The Devil alone can do?” This well illustrates the abnormality of some methods of sug- gestibility evident on all sides, coming from individuals and in- stitutions that like Faust have sold themselves body and soul to the arch fiend, who uses them as his best tools of influence in the corruption of the world, whose triumph will end with the great tribulation upon all men and nations after the coming of Christ for His Church. 118 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? On the other hand, normal suggestibility is the impressing of a fact or truth upon the rational mind so that it will be compre- hended in all its aspects, not possible alone through natural per- sonal endowments, but infused by God’s Holy Spirit, who then uses the Word as a revelation to men. “For after that in the wisdom _of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling block, and unto the Greeks foolishness; but unto them (that believe) which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God.” (1 Cor. 1:21, 25). Normal suggestibility is then clearly the key to the kingdom of heaven. On the day of Pentecost, the Apostle Peter’s re- markable sermon dealt with the great historical facts of the Gos- pel: the heart and center of it was not himself as a medium or as a “vicar,” nor even that he was “the rock upon which the Church is built,” but the heart and center of his address was “the resurrection and exaltation of Jesus Christ.’”’ Here he used the keys entrusted to him for opening the kingdom to all Israel. And then, on another occasion, in the house of Cornelius, he uses the keys to open the kingdom for the Gentiles, henceforth calling no man common or unclean, but teaching all in humility to love their neighbors as themselves, and to show the love of Christ which passeth knowledge. Such love for souls is the magnetic power infused by the Holy Spirit, given into the hands of every consecrated Christian to suggest, to preach the Gospel of grace and salvation, proving that if we, in this dispensation are to preach the Gospel to any purpose, we must yearn for salvation more than for the things of this world that corrode and rust in their using. And not only preaching but praying is here identified with the keys with which the kingdom of heaven is opened to all men. Was suggestion ever more normal, sublime and impressive than when Moses prayed for his erring people: “This people have sinned Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 119 a great sin, and have made them gods of gold. Yet now, if Thou wilt forgive their sin;—and,—if not,—blot me I pray Thee, out of Thy book which Thou hast written.” (Ex. 32:32). We hear the choked accents in which the words, “If Thou wilt for- give their sin”; fall from the laboring breast, and then there is silence; but the convulsively clasped hands, the trembling lips, the entreating eyes are an oratory passing speech, and fill the long pause—till breath is given once more in the sublime self- sacrifice of the closing words. It is thus that God challenges His Church to exercise the en- trusted power with which she is to carry forward her mission in the world. What is the conception, what is the purpose of mis- sions but this,—‘Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gos- pel to every creature!” This also brings before us the difference between the revivals of the past and the revival meetings more modern. The current of thought and attention to a certain degree sets strongly at present toward Christianity, perhaps on account of the things we were forced to learn during the recent world war. We hear ex- pressions giving the appearance of constructiveness, while others make for conservation in religious doctrines, ideals and practices. This interest like a pilgrim, stands before the mighty temple of human reverence requesting recognition. There is amid many obstacles an evident movement toward universality along all lines of endeavor ; democracy in government, and spirituality as against materialism; wherein the Church must assert herself in order to be true to her mission. Now is her opportunity, for the restless- ness of our age seems to be clamoring for a revival of religion. During the last few years however, a distinction in revivalism, or, better, evangelism, has arisen which so-called specialists would term a distinction between the old and the new. New methods are being tested, novel ideas in advertising and organization, astounding in scope are now in vogue. Whole cities and com- munities are reached, large corporations, represented by em- ployers and employees in bodies of hundreds help fill spacious 120 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? tabernacles, built to seat from eight to twenty thousand persons. The structure, with its crude arrangements, devoid of all custom- ary church furnishings, appeals to the masses. The songs are catchy, the immense choirs are led or directed by musicians of ability, and, after a soul stirring sermon by a world-famed evan- gelist, thousands “hit the trail,’ and are reaped with a “combined mowing machine and binder.” It is claimed that masses of men and women are reached in this way upon whom the old methods of revivalism would make no impression. Striking however are the events of the old revivalism. The Reformation. of the Church, in the sixteenth century, which was marked by a return to the doctrine of justification by faith, is re- garded as the greatest revival since the apostolic age. The next great awakening occurred in England in the seventeenth century, in which the doctrine of the sovereignty of God was emphasized, followed by another in the eighteenth century from which the Methodist denomination originated under John and Charles Wes- ley. Not until after this period was the word “revival” common- ly used. Those revivals which took place in North America at about the same time were connected with the spread of Method- ism in England, and were called “the general awakening.” George Whitefield has been regarded as the forerunner of re- vivalism since the Reformation. Johnathan Edwards in the year 1734, at Northampton, Massachussetts, became his successor, and stimulated the use of the ordinary means of grace for the promotion of religion. In some very few instances we find the record of abnormal suggestibility in the work of men who tried to produce religious or political excitement upon large gatherings where they worked upon the nervous sensibilities of the people. Nothing of this na- ture is seen however in general evangelism, as for instance in the great religious movement in the year 1857. Its origin is ascribed in part to the thought and feeling awakened during a period of great commercial distress. This movement began primarily in Connecticut and Mas- Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 121 sachussetts, rapidly extending to New York and then the Middle and Western States. It was not generally attended by scenes of great excitement. A strong, calm, religious fervor was its general characteristic. In New York City most every evangelical denomination received large accessions; prayer meetings were held at all hours of the day and night, attended by large num- bers of people, mainly men actively engaged in business. More than two thousand communities in New York State were reported as partaking in this revival. It spread to England and other parts of the continent where its redeeming force was felt. In the year 1830 another mighty revival swept our beloved land under the able and most spiritual preaching of Charles G. Finney and Joel Parker, wherein man’s free agency was emphasized, followed by the labors of Dwight L. Moody and Ira Sankey in England and America in 1874, with the wondrous love of God as the sublime message, continuing here and there as long as the great evangelist lived. The underlying causes of these mighty movements were com- plex, political, industrial and religious, but the Church grasping the opportunity, beginning perhaps in the form of individual preaching and exhorting, in the tones of gospel repentance and saving grace, and often supported by a number in prayer, the phenomena spread over a wide area. That which marked the notable revivals of the past was the importance of prayer, the preaching of an unadulterated gospel, a vital contact with souls, faith in the power of God to save to the uttermost, and the re- capture of vital truths needed for the time, an act of grace on the part of God, in which the Holy Spirit predominated over and above all human endeavor. “Contrast all this,” said Dr. J. Wilbur Chapman, “with modern efforts to secure a revival. A private pamphlet prepared by a certain evangelist as a guide to a committee who were making ready for his coming, proved shockingly full of dependence on “business methods,” such as advertising, striking announcements, big posters, etc., in which he would have everything done to jes Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? create public furore in advance. This is the way of the world, and it is now fast becoming the way of the Church. We are getting away from dependence on ordinary means of grace, when- ever we do not expect any widespread blessing on the preaching of the simple gospel, prayer, and personal contact with souls. We must have several churches united and great meetings, with distinguished evangelists, and great choirs with far famed gos- pel singers, or we look for no divine outpourings. All this is unscriptural, unspiritual, abnormal.” (Chapman, Present-Day Evangelism, p. 67). A wider difference in the revivals of the past and the present is seen in a new point of view, in what is now generally termed “the awakening of the social consciousness,” as specifically out- lined on the basis of sociology by men like Dr. Josiah Strong in his “The Conversion of the Church” whose articles long appeared in certain religious magazines, and Professor Walter Rauschen- busch in his several books. These men claim that the Church needs a new conversion on the basis that Christianity brought something quite in opposition to conditions already fixed in social life when it insisted that the strong should bear the infirmities of the weak; that those without helpers in their loneliness and need should be cared for; that the fallen should be lifted; that the oppressed shall have justice; and the apparently unprofitable in society saved, made fit and developed in moral and spiritual qualities of worth and goodness. This conquest is claimed to be a struggle for moral and spirit- ual power; that it is essential for the Church to manifest her supremacy in this realm, in the interest of a truer and juster re- lationship among men. The traditional evangelism, however, is regarded as not quite meeting the situation today. It is particu- larly individualistic and so far does certain good, but needs to be supplemented by the newer social evangelism. The strange thing about these developments is that they are not new, but older than the old ones. We are but again redis- covering an old gospel, expecting a few modern philosophical in- Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 123 sertions which are foreign to the plan of God. The new country is simply Christ’s old kingdom of God, so long hid by traditional- ism, institutionalism, speculation and selfishness, and if much that was first is last, and much that was last is becoming first, it is in accordance with the teaching of our Lord while upon earth. But, socialism seems to be the tendency of the times, and if gradually all this is to be exclusive of the old unadulterated gos- pel with its fundamentals of faith and salvation; or if this is to be exclusively the twentieth century version of it, wherein we say, “away with God, there is no God but man; away with theology, give us psychology and sociology, for religion is not the love of God, but the love of man,” then it will be a terrible re- trogression in the realm of faith, thought and progress, and we need beware lest the arrow speed amiss, and take solemn warn- ing from the seer-like lines of Robert Browning: “Karthly incitements that mankind serve God For man’s sole sake—not God’s—and therefore man’s Till at last who distinguishes the sun From a mere Druid fire on a fair mount?” CHAPTER XV. 4). EDUCATIONAL MEANS OF CREATING STABILI- TY, (a) IN THE INDIVIDUAL; (b) IN SOCIETY. Religion is an experience of the soul that cannot be created by cultural knowledge. This experiment has been tried over and over again in institutions of learning, as any branch of science might be taught, and the result has proven a general and per- manent aversion toward it, and mainly where the tendency has been to divorce philosophy from theology, in which case it is im- possible for either to advance. This has made so many of the schools more ignorant of proximate causation than the Greeks in the remote days of Thales. However, and as a means to the end that it spells obligation, culture as a divine gift, if properly received and infused through true methods of instruction, gives understanding and ability. “Culture’s hand has scatter’d verdure o’er the land; And smiles and fragrance rule serene, Where barren wild usurped the scene. And such is man—a soil which breeds Or sweetest flowers or vilest weeds; Fiowers lovely as the morning light, Weeds deadly as an aconite; Just as his heart is trained to bear The poisonous weed, or flow’ret fair.” (Bowring) A person wrongly educated is perhaps as badly off as one educated not at all, and generally injurious to the rest of man- kind; it is little better than turning out a mad dog or a wild beast into the streets. In these days of much false teaching Christian parents need to be very careful in directing with a weighty sense of responsibility, prayerfully, their children’s ad- vancement, physically, morally and mentally. Spiritual life may be fostered in many homes, but with a large majority the realiza- tion has not yet dawned that the boy or girl that bases his or her principles of development on the great fundamentals of Chris- 124 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 125 tian doctrine has a power within to mould and strengthen the whole career. The schoolhouse, through which passes a long procession of American youth to receive the stamp of the instructor’s mind, is the gymnasium of American manhood. As with the new Chris- tian convert in the religion of Jesus Christ, so everything de- pends on the personality and type of education impressed, and if no supplementary work is carried out, the condition of the mind and the soul is liable to be worse than at the beginning. In religion men are valued according to what they are and not what they have been. The purest gold carried on a vessel that too late proves unseaworthy, will go to the bottom. Such is the course of many a fortune, be it in property or educational advantages. God values the man, not the cargo. He sets His estimation high because in a human being there is material for wonderful development into the highest and noblest qualities. Ifa baker desires to stamp a “Uneeda Biscuit,” or mould the dough into another form, it must be done before it enters the oven. Thus those who retain the child-like spirit can easily be stabilized if trained in the way they should go. The early Christians rejected the educational system of pagan- ism. Gradually however through the centuries it regained its hold on the universities and educational centers of the world, producing innumerable skeptics. What the home and the Church tried to impress indelibly upon the pliable mind has been ridi- culed as old-fashioned by the liberal schools. Then after gradua- tion these unstable young people are let loose upon the world in their search for an occupation and in the most complex situa- tion they are bewildered, and unguided; in a few years they will have wandered into “the far country,’ which is perfectly natural, and where they will pay the price of bitter experience, some perhaps returning to the old truths learned at “mother’s knee,” but for the most part there is no hope for them in a spiritual sense. But, who is to blame? The Judgment will reveal the guilty. 126 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? The basis of their education has been doubt, a persistency to question, and a resistance to Christian truth, wherein the Church was denied interference. It was on this account that the first Christians freed themselves from “the philosophy of this world.” It is again for this reason that the more modern Church in mat- ters of education has passed through an awful siege of spiritual declension. Once again the Church has seen an anti-climax in human de- velopment and an awakening from the dreams of evolutionary theories. It was no new experience in her history. The doc- trines of natural development dazzled modern thought, but the trumpets of “rationalism” caused a great stirring indeed in the world war between “Corsica and Galilee.” Once again God has laid His restraining hand upon war, frustrated the designs of wickedness, given light in place of darkness, and seemingly paled the shining star of hope in the dawning of a better day. Shall we then return to the weak and beggarly elements of earthly prosperity and agree with the majority who would build with them a kingdom of God? Shall we agree to construct another tower that shall reach to heaven, built upon the old foundation of human goodness, but not upon the divinely laid foundation of Christ? Such should not be our use of the new opportunity that God has given to the world, to repent, believe, and teach the gospel to all the human race. Culture is as aristocratic as titled nobility. Knowledge is power, and power of any kind is a temptation to arrogance and selfishness, according to the sentiment of a recent sermon by Dr. James I. Vance. Therein he rightly claimed that culture is a good thing only if based on the principle of obligation; but, if it is an end unto itself, if it claims no obligation toward those of a lower or more ignorant standard, it will prove as irresponsive to the individual’s piteous appeals as is the exquisite effigy on a sarcophagus to the tears which bedew its marble feet. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 127 Rights belong to culture, but not to the exclusion of its obliga- tions. Culture is obligation. Knowledge is debt. The world is creditor. A talent belongs to the market-place, not in a napkin. Where men merely grow big in fortune, knowledge, culture, deft- ness, they are monstrosities. If the reservoir gives no water, what remains stagnates and breeds pestilence, and fouls the reser- voir. Force cannot achieve its purpose by conservation. Conversion however, is a spiritual law of force, like sponta- neous combustion, will burst through the strongest encasement. The Church of the sixteenth century would gladly have paid Dr. Martin Luther a fabulous sum if he had quietly remained at Erfurth. Savonarola was no favorite at Florence, yet these heroes of the faith would not spare their own lives proclaiming the truth in opposition to the prevailing ignorance sanctioned by the Church of Rome. Similarly today the problems are not all solved. It is an age of immense material resources, of rapidly increasing knowledge, of tremendous forces, both for good and evil, and if there are men and women without a cali to give and suffer ringing through their souls and stirring their very lives, they are slackers indeed, like the one talent man burying his capital in the earth. Christians are to enlighten the world. In it all, but not of it all, wherein we need not fear the satanic hand in false philos- ophies and teachings in erroneous doctrines, for truth cannot be killed, it is eternal. Our need is to translate knowledge into wisdom, for it is still true that “knowledge comes, but wisdom lingers.” The geologist tells us that our earth is very old, some 800,000,- ooo years. Does knowledge of that fact make me a better man? The biologist has a fascinating story of the origin of organisms. Does his recital put my soul in tune with the original goodness of God? The astronomer tells us that world building is not static but kinetic, not at rest but moving, dynamic. But does such in- 128 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? formation in itself make the more than starry wings of my soul unfold for higher flights into the heaven of God’s holiness ? Civilization has but faintly tested the truths of Christianity. That men are asking anew “what is Christianity ?’’—is a promis- ing sign, for such recognize that it is the only basis for stability. The conclusive evidence they behold in those whose lives are “epistles known and read of all men,” whose minds are lofty and pure, the very “salt of the earth,” “‘the Holy Catholic Church,” the “Bride of Christ.” Their relationship and obligation toward men everywhere is beautifully depicted in the inspired lines by Fredrick Meyer: “Oft the Word is on me to deliver, Lifts the illusion, and the truth lies bare. Desert or throng, the city or the river, Melts in a lucid paradise of air. Only like souls, I see the flock there-under, : Bound who should conquer; slaves who should be kings; Hearing their one hope with a vacant wonder, Sadly contented with a show of things. Then with a rush, the intolerable craving Shivers throughout me like a trumpet eall, Oh, to save some, to perish for their saving, Die for their life, be offered for them all.” Naturally then the means of grace offered by Christ through His Church in teaching and preaching affect every phase of society for good, as witnessed throughout her history. Grievous mistakes have been made, acknowledged and corrected from time to time. Through the Church, with the example of Christ ever before her as her ideal, men have been lifted to higher standards in morals and education. Where other systems have ignominious- ly failed, Christianity has been weighed and not found wanting. Summarizing some extreme sentiments along this line, pre- ceding the war, our thinkers most optimistically told us that “knowledge has become contagion; intelligence is so diffused that in a sense every man is his own teacher, doctor, lawyer, minister. Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 129 The very complexity of modern life is making illiteracy impos- sible. Ignorance can handle a hoe, can pick corn from a husk and cotton from a pod. But locomotives that travel sixty miles an hour, ask the engineer to go up beside Watt and master his inventive skill. Looms that enable one man in one year to spin cloth enough to clothe ten thousand men, ask for informed fingers. Presses that print one hundred thousand papers in a single night demand widely cultured intellects. Today we have common workmen who approach the wise men of two hundred years ago. Our public schools have created an enthusiasm for education that is pathetic. Our working people understand that so long as they remain ignorant, the ecclesiastical despot will op- press them, the political despot will spoil them of their treasures, the industrial despot will tyrannize over them. To escape op- pression the toiler becomes informed. Education is making the poor man’s muscles so powerful that despots cannot afford iron enough to reach around his wrist.” This visionary, pre-war conception of the power of modern education is too far fetched, especially where, in a secondary sense only, Christianity has been permitted to affect our educa- tional system. There is here with us a most perplexing problem, a bone of contention, with no solution in sight, excepting in the trained religious teacher. An education without the Christian re- ligion lacks stability, leading in the majority of cases to immoral- ity and crime. During the reign of Augustus, the Romans high- ly educated, grew rich in wealth but poorer in morals. Men de- sired to remain bachelors, and the women prided themselves in divorce. The birth rate decreased to an alarming degree. There was no religion. At the height of splendor and culture, Rome fell. The moral fiber had snapped. There was no stamina, for that departs with religion; and when that is gone, nothing is left but a vacuum or a hollow mockery. Just so our nation that prides itself in its excellent public school system, and there is none better in all the world, has room for great improvement, and if somehow, religion, and only that of the 130 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? Holy Bible, does not become a part of our curriculum, we shall go to ruin on the shoals of political intrigue, ecclesiastical despotism and irreligion. Here and there attempts are being made to link the public schools with the Church, credit and recognition being allowed for work thus done in Bible study, according to what is known as the North Dakota plan, the Colorado plan, the Gary plan. These attempts at a solution however have not met with general favor. Naturally this is a peculiar function, belonging to the Church, and because this is so, it has become a mighty ques- tion for agitation, seeking a solution which may never be found. Evidently it is only through the Sunday School that this task may eventually be performed, through the consecrated, trained teacher, a profession which today is demanding the best thought, plan and effort. In all these forward movements it is clear that the people feel that the secret of progress is the secret of Jesus Christ. It journeyed from Bethlehem across the continents, its breath sum- mer, its presence warmth, its footprints harvests. It is stealing softly into the human heart, rebuking coarseness and vice, and blotting out sorrow and sin. Through it laws will become just, rulers humane, music sweeter, homes happier, and men will be looking unto the hills more and more from whence cometh their help, the Ideal of a perfected humanity. The psychological experiences of the religious life therefore teach us that the higher the life standard, the more external help it needs for development. Man needs culture, knowledge, affec- tion, work, nature, solitude, society, art, literature and religion. He is however not wholly alive until he learns that “he cannot live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.” The fact remains that Christ’s atonement for sin has given mankind a different aspect of life, by proving in Himself that He is not dead, but liveth forever, the Resurrection and the Life, the Originator and Preserver, the All and in All. And through what- ever land, hamlet or heart He is permitted to journey, sweet blos- Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 131 soms grow in His pathway, for it is the highway of salvation from sin which leadeth unto life. The challenge therefore is that all men everywhere test the need of the immortal soul, together with Christ’s promises, and fully accept His offering of love. It is thus that “He gave Him- self for the Church that He might sanctify it and cleanse it with the washing of water by the Word in order to present it unto Himself without spot or wrinkle.” (Eph. 5:27). This ‘is the final consummation of the believer’s hope, and by faith even now we are able to grasp the promise made doubly secure to the heirs by the oath which God made to Abraham, “that by two immutable things, in which it was impossible for God to lie, we might have a strong consolation, who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us.” (Heb. 6: 17,20). In the grand concert of history these are called upon to come in on time, to enter the larger life, prepared to see Him as He is, when in His appearance, the morning stars again shall sing together the song of the redeemed. In the meanwhile may we build for the soul a better residence than this body by building daily a better soul. “Build thee more stately mansions, O my soul, As the swift seasons roll. Leave thy low-vaulted past. Let each new temple, nobler than the last, Shut thee from heaven with a dome more vast, Till thou at last.art free, Leaving thine outgrown shell by life’s unresting sea.” SHALL JESUS FIND FAITH ON EARTH? IV. ~ ACCORDING TO SOCIAL SCIENCE: SOME SOCIAL PROBLEMS OF THE PRESENT DAY CHAPTER XVI. In the process of sound study it is important to get a subject into its proper place among its related subjects and to see its ontlines in their just proportions. Almost every subject has its relations to every other subject, and the special student always needs to keep this in mind. This is necessary as to the subject before us, where we find that many terms have been suggested in place of the hybrid word “sociology,” taken from the Greek and the Latin, such as politics, political science, political philos- ophy, social psychology and social philosophy. The name now most generally used is “social science,” there- by making it a specific field of investigation, freed from com- plicated details, and although intimately related to psychology and ethics, according to Herbert Spencer in his “Principles of Sociology,” it stands forth as the controlling principle between the two, and upon which both of these are dependent. Plato, in his “Laws,” and “The Republic,” and Aristotle, in his “Ethics” and ‘Politics,’ wrote profusely on subjects related to private, social and political morals, thereby practically, and from a philo- sophical standpoint, laying the foundation for this much later distinct science. As biology may be defined as the science of life and living organisms, so social science may be defined as the science of hu- man society. It is that part of natural philosophy which deals with fundamental laws, origin, history, organization and develop- ment of human society and social phenomena, in which are re- 132 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 133 vealed the laws that control human intercourse; thereby proving itself vitally related to ethnology, excepting that it is an advance from primitive society to society of a more organic type, having therefore a wider scope than even the science of politics, with which it was formerly identified. While the entire vast field of the social history of mankind is sometimes claimed for this science, its studies are chiefly con- fined, as the New Standard Dictionary outlines it, “to the de- velopment and various forms of—1. Government; embracing the gens, tribes, confederacy, chieftainship, monarchy, theocracy, democracy, etc.; 2. Marriage, a) its forms; embracing pro- miscuity, polygamy, polyandry and monogamy; b) its rites; and c) its limitations, with laws of descent and consanguinity; 3. Law and custom, embracing primitive ethics, the taboo, blood- revenge, law-tenure, caste, codes and international law.” This almost inexhaustive range attributed to it is perhaps based on the statements of the earlier scientists, for instance, Auguste Comte, (1798-1857), a French philosopher, who in a utilitaristic system, crowned with fantastic decoration, proved himself the Bellamy of his time, and who is, perhaps, the earliest writer of note to present the subject as a science, claiming it also to be “the religion of humanity.” Herbert Spencer, (1820-1903), the English contemporary of Comte, and the chief exponent of organic and social evolution, in his “Principles of Sociology” introduced the biological conception of development under the figure of speech which considered this life as a kind of “social organism,’ in which he even went so far as to place religion as having evolved from fear because of original worship of ancestral ghosts; but his biological concep- tion of society or life as an organism, as well as his peculiar view of religion, cannot be applied, and have proven to be thoughts much debated and by many writers discarded. With all the philosophizing upon the subject of sociology from Socrates down and throughout the middle ages, there is evident nevertheless a gradual aim at improvement in the theory of 134 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? society, as seen in the conflict between spiritual and temporal forces, comparable to the unrest in Egypt at the time of Moses, as well as that of the age of the prophets, then in the period of the Reformation, which gave impetus to the rennaisance, similar to the time of the incarnation of God in Christ Jesus. These movements developed opposing ideas between old and new con- ceptions, eventually bringing forth a further development in the politico-religious upheaval in the seventeenth century, resulting in the writings of Locke, Huxley and Kant, with their concep- tions of society as dependent on humane and just laws of the State, through which they hoped to gain increased liberties for all classes. Strange indeed that all these wide ranging views finally culmi- nated in the twin theories of Darwin and Haeckel, with their acknowledged help to man for the better understanding of his handicaps and to adjust his endeavors to ascertained laws; silent, however, as to the ultimate values of faith and service. During and after this period sociology was often confused with socialism. Morris Hillquit, a leader among the socialists, in his widely read book on “Socialism in Theory and Practice,’ (p. 211), claims that “the ultimate aim of the socialist movement is to convert the material means of production and distribution into the common property of the nation, as the only radical and effectual cure of all social evils.” From this line of thought and as Hillquit generally sets forth the principles of socialism, it is noticeable that the fundamental principles of socialism belong not to social science nor to economics, but are metaphysical. Such fallacies as the primary principle of the equal rights of all men; the insisting on industry being the sole gauge of emolument, and the materialistic estimate of all existence, as though man’s soul were too dreamy a thing to be reasoned about, are fatal; for wrong principles cannot produce constructive and curative meas- ures. Nor is the theory of universal compulsory labor a natural ora salutary conception ; for it gets in the way of the culture of the Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? ee higher faculties, and simply converts all society into one great productive union, productive only in the gross material sense; with materialism, pure and simple, as the god of the new socialism, warfare on Christianity being its negative religion, and the adoration of human equality its positive. Socialism is therefore a theory pure and simple of how society ought to be arranged, while social science on the other hand de- scribes all the facts, laws, and forces of society, with the purpose of correcting its evils on the basis of the laws of regeneration, righteousness and love. Instead of social science being the same as socialism, or in any way being responsible for it, it may be said that it affords the only complete answer to it, and remedy for it, at least from a scientific point of view. “The highest reach of our social nature is that we may have fellowship with God. Still this science concerning man’s high- est nature is the latest born of all the sciences. Fifty years ago wise men began to systematize the facts of society, to study man as a Socius, and the many combinations he has formed with his fellows. Theology was old, astronomy was gray when sociology was born. In 1883 there was not a chair of sociology in any uni- versity or college in the world. In 1883 the first book on Dynamic Sociology was published. Though late in birth it has grown strong through the studies of many keen thinkers and great lovers of their kind.” (Schenck, Sociology and Bible, p. 9). For some years preceding the world war, an attempt was made to unite this science with the teaching of Christian ethics, giving the impression that there had until now been two separate classes of principles of goodness and mercy. Truth is never at war with truth. Jesus Christ is The Light who enlightened the world when it was darkest and throughout the ages. It was His com- ing alone that revolutionized not only religion but society, and gave false philosophy such a proof of its fallacy that it either had to go out of business or change its principles. Since then a vital change has come over the world. A war considered the most destructive in history has ended, leaving it 136 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? desperate and gasping. Men are now clamoring for a social re- construction, and with an incomparable spirit of philanthropy. are asserting that “right and proper, just and Christian are the efforts being put forth by organizations and individuals to alle- viate the sufferings, to lighten the burdens, and to care for those who have been broken and bruised in life’s struggle. By all means place ambulances at the foot of every cliff to take care of stricken humanity, but before all other work, construct fences around precipices so as to prevent men and women from falling. Palhative philanthropy is good, but preventive philanthropy is far better. The day of the dole is past. Dollars do not reach the heart of the social problem. Constructive and curative measures are demanded. Many of the city’s ills can be permanently cured, and the business of Christians is to remove the causes which produce the socially diseased.’”’ (Montgomery, Christ’s Social Remedies, p. 397). What a beautiful appeal for benevolence. Much of the state- ment is commendable; yet, if “the salt of the earth” can scrip- turally assert itself to such an extent as to remove the causes which produce the socially diseased, it must be a new type of exegesis. Dr. Montgomery’s book reads well, as do all the modern works along this line, but they all seem too theoretical. How and by whom shall the principles of modern social science be applied? We are now told that it is the duty of the Chris- tians. For centuries, on the basis of Christian ethics, there has been an aim at this result through the medium of proclaiming and practicing insistently the Gospel, which included the social principles of Christ as opposed to a so-called “social gospel,” wherein the fundamental doctrines of Christianity are discarded. On the other hand, if the purpose of this new movement is to substitute a religion of good works for the basis of true faith, then is this a coat of a different color, for a true gospel of grace is inseparable from a gospel of good works. It is all well and good to know intimately the construction of society, its anatomy, its social organs and functions, its psychology, its maladies and Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 187 therapeutic remedies, all that can be known of the facts of scientific investigation and study. These facts are all useful in attaining a clear view of social science, but the inner life on which all depends cannot be overlooked without defeating the very purpose and end of. the subject under consideration. “It is thus that social science is made prominent in speeches, articles and books, as though it embodied an entirely unknown and new proposition. Those who have come to the end of their resources in the conduct of church work on purely individualistic lines have made use of this convenient phrase to stir new interest and arouse latent energy. It gives new hope and promises a course of activity attractive and perhaps lucrative. Social science is thus far gaining expresston in surveys of various sorts and in columns of social service counsel. There has been developed the social service expert, who is prepared to talk learnedly and to undertake in the field of any church or in any city a survey of religious or vice conditions. He will show any pastor why it is his church is not growing. He will make clear what is to be done, except the really essential thing, how to have a genuine awakening and how to develop the social conscience so that it may become the controlling center of a community, or how to put in effect his own advice.” (Clericus, Constructive Character of Social Service). Only too true, and thus at the outset our position in the mat- ter must also be understood. With all due respect for the ad- herents and converts of this new science, and all the books writ- ten and being read upon this subject, the fact nevertheless stands absolute, that the Church cannot scripturally federate with the world in its efforts for civic righteousness, social betterment and world regeneration by any other method than the Gospel of Jesus Christ. The apostolic admonition to “prove all things and hold fast that which is good,” places us here in line with such scriptural men as R. E. Neighbour, who in his “The Folly of Federation Be- tween the Church and the World,” clearly sets forth seven 138 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? reasons why the Church cannot join with the world in efforts for these things: 1. because their standards of righteousness and of right living are distinct and opposite; 2. because there is no biblical sanction for such federation either in the lives or in the teachings of Jesus Christ and the Apostles; 3. because the mission of the Church is to call out of the world a people for Christ’s sake; 4. because the Church is suffering unspeakably by world alliance; 5. because the work is not of God, and is destined to certain failure; 6. because federation is condemned by the Word of God, and is an evident preparation for the com- ing of Antichrist; 7. because the heads of the Church and the world are distinct and opposite.” How carefully and clearly then the distinction must be defined. How much must be excluded which some writers include and consider important. If the movement as supported by many able men is merely a philosophical experiment, it will utterly fail, re- maining a fad or fancy, having a selfish purpose in view. Supporting the positive social science writers, teachers and preachers, presented not to the exclusion of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, we find their position digested in the following declara- tion: “The influence upon the development of civilization of the wider conception of duty and responsibility to one’s fellow men which was introduced into the world with the spread of Chris- tianity can hardly be overestimated. The extended conception of the answer to the question—Who is my Neighbor ?—which has resulted from the characteristic doctrines of the Christian re- ligion, a conception transcending all the claims of the family, group, state, nation, people or race, and even all the interests comprised in any existing order of society, has been the most powerful agent which has ever acted on society.” (Kidd, Encl. Bripesociies20)" Men of this type discern aright and never attempt to divorce good works from true faith. They hold fast to the primary prin- ciple that we are justified from all things only through Jesus Christ, having redemption through His blood, the forgiveness of Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 139 sins according to the riches of His grace. This scriptural principle is also inseparably connected with the fact that good, worthy, ac- ceptable works on the basis of sacrifice are the natural result of a stabilized faith. Not that works can save or justify before God; though they do justify us before men, as declared by the apostle, “that being justified by His grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life. This is a faithful say- ing, and these things affirm constantly, that they which have be- lieved in God might be careful to maintain good works. These things are good and profitable unto men.” (Titus 3:7-8). With this fact clearly defined, and the field of social service accurately surveyed, our position must naturally be to proceed from the view-point of the Christian, for, said the famous Dr. Chalmers in his “Modesty of True Science,” p. 83, “there is a superficial philosophy which casts the glare of a most seducing brilliancy around it; and spurns the Bible, with all the doctrine, and all the piety of the Bible away from it; and has infused the spirit of Antichrist into many of the literary establishments of the age; but it is not the solid, the profound, the cautious spir- it of that philosophy, which has done so much to ennoble the modern period of our world; for the more that this spirit is cultivated and understood, the more will it be found in alliance with that spirit, in virtue of which all that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, is humbled, and all lofty imaginations are cast down, and every thought of the heart is brought into captivity of the obedience of Christ.” Upon this foundation we are prepared to study some social problems of the present day as evident in cities of five thousand or more inhabitants, from the view-point of the Christian. CHAPTER XVII. 1). A COMPREHENSIVE DEFINITION OF SOCIETY. “Man, in society, is like a flow’r Blown in its native bud. ’Tis there alone His faculties expanded in full bloom Shine out, there only reach their proper use.” (Cowper). Society in a general sense is made up of three distinct stages; savagery, barbarism and civilization. Next to savagery, which is the crudest, rudest and most primitive form of human life, still prevalent in isolated parts of the world, we find that a barbarian, according to Homer, was one who could not speak the language of the Greeks. Later Plato divided the human race into Hellenes and Barbaroi. The word ‘barbaroi’ is of unknown origin, meaning mainly a babel of tongues, upon which the Greeks in the consciousness of their superior intelligence looked with disdain, as opposed to their standard of life’s conception. Beginning with Plautus the Romans accepted the appellation attributed by the Greeks, but under Augustus, when Rome became a world power, the name was applied to all foreign tribes. It represented those peoples that dwelt in the recesses of deep forests, and those who in the migration of nations came forth in swarms to combat with the then known civilization, the followers of Alaric, Attila, Genseric and Odoacer, that overspread the territories of the Roman Empire. In modern times the name signifies whatever is savage, uncivilized or ignorant. On the other hand by civilization is meant the more advanced, cultural stage of society in contrast with savagery and barbarism, when men as individuals redressed their own wrongs. Philoso- phers preceding the French Revolution conceived civilization as a form of agreement opposed to the state of nature, by yielding obedience and support to the State. The word ‘society’ has reference to the permanent changes in the condition and arrangements of the life of man as effected 140 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 141 by his own intelligence and exertions which make up human civilization. It is the artificial half of the good that men enjoy. Nature has been most generous in her gifts; our own powers of contrivance give the rest. Genius in the sense of intellectual originality is the cause, and civilization the effect. F. P. Guizot, (1787-1874), in his “History of Civilization in Europe” claims that “on the whole, when we survey the state of society at the end of the crusades, we will find that the move- ment tending to dissolution and dispersion had ceased, and had been succeeded by a movement in a contrary direction, a move- ment of centralization. All things tended to mutual approxima- tion ; small things were absorbed in great ones, or gathered round them. “Such in my opinion, are the real effects of the crusades; on the one hand the extension of ideas and the emancipation of thought; on the other, a general enlargement of the social sphere, and the opening of a wider field for every sort of activity; they produced at the same time, more individual freedom, and more political unity. They tended to the independence of man and the centralization of society. “Many inquiries have been made respecting the means of civili- zation which were directly imported from the East. It has been said that the great discoveries which, in the course of the four- teenth and fifteenth centuries, contributed to the progress of European civilization, such as the compass, printing and gun- powder, were known in the East, and that the crusades brought them into Europe. This is true to a certain extent, though some of these assertions may be disputed. But what cannot be disputed is this influence, this general effect of the crusades upon the human mind on the one hand, and the state of society on the other. They drew society out of a very narrow road, to throw it into new and infinitely broader paths; they began that transformation of the various elements of European society into governments and nations, which is the characteristic of modern civilization.” 142 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? Thus Guizot defines society, and his view is generally accepted, to the extent as we read his works further, that we are to include in civilization “the improvement of man both socially and in his individual capacity.”” However, when we look to the pages of history and perceive what this old world has passed through up, to the latest world war, with the fall of many governments and empires, much of our boasted improvement, both material and institutional, lies in ashes. The most debatable subject, there- fore, is the question whether there is improvement, whether “the world is growing better,” as so many of our so-called optimists and evolutionists blindly declare it is with glowing emphasis. The question seems answerable only in the words of Alfred Ten- nyson: “Through the ages one insistent purpose runs And the thoughts of God are ripening With the progress of the suns.” The improvement of society is far from the truth when we reasonably take into consideration the vices of civilization and try to distinguish these from its virtues. The matter would be very much simplified and nearer the truth if “aiming at improve- ment” were distinguished from really achieving it as it is often boastfully declared that “this 1s the most wonderful standard of civilization the world has ever known.” It cannot be denied that the many inventions and discoveries that have entered into modern life have raised society to a higher level, but can these be the evidences that men are enjoying a vital improvement? If these were introduced with a “view to improve- ment,” the idea of civilization as to the modern degree of society will then present a definite conception of fact, otherwise the whole question must be left open for a discussion wherein we will encounter much difference of opinion. Distinguishing between the vices and virtues of civilization and at the same time showing the real purpose of this state of society from the premises of social science, is well illustrated by Emile Souvestre, (1806-1854), a French journalist and essayist, in his - Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 143 “Reflections of the Social Body,’ wherein he exclaims: “What a wonderful order there is in all human labor. Whilst the husbandman furrows his land, and prepares for everyone his daily bread, the town artisan, far away, weaves the stuff in which he is to be clothed; the miner seeks underground the iron for his plough; the judge takes care that the law protects his fields ; the tax-comptroller adjusts his private interests with those of the public; the merchant occupies himself in exchanging his products with those of distant countries; the men of science and of art add every day a few horses to this ideal team, which draws along the material world, as steam impels the gigantic trains of our iron roads. “There is nothing like this in the state of nature. No one reaps, manufactures, fights, or thinks for him; he is nothing to anyone. Yet, notwithstanding this, the other day, disgusted by the sight of some vices in detail, I cursed civilization and almost envied the life of the savage. One of the infirmities of our na- ture is always to mistake feeling for evidence, and to judge of the season by a cloud or a ray of sunshine. “Was the misery, the sight of which made me regret a savage life, really the effect of civilization? Must we accuse society of having created these evils, or acknowledge on the contrary, that it has alleviated them ?. Could the women and children who were receiving the coarse bread from the soldier hope in the desert for more help and pity? That dead man whose forsaken state I deplored, had he not found by the cares of an hospital, a coffin, and the humble grave where he was about to rest? Alone, far from men, he would have died like the wild beast in his den, and would be serving as food for vultures. “These benefits of human society are shared then by the most destitute. But cannot society give more? Who doubts it? Errors have been committed in this distribution of tasks and workers. Time will diminish the numbers of them; with new lights a better division will arise.” Souvestre here beautifully exemplifies the humanitarian pur- 144 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? pose of civilization, to the enjoyment of all concerned. Society looked upon in this light evidences also several departments that have helped make it what it is. The industrial arts and inven- tions which have been discovered are bringing the material re- sources of the earth to advantage. The governments of nations have passed from stage to stage until now democracy is con- sidered the ideal of all peoples. The art of intercourse as seen in the improvement of the telephone, telegraph, wireless telegraphy, cable, and that of speedy conveyance, all have shortened distances to the extent that they are looked upon as vital necessities. The growth of the moral and spiritual influence of the Christian Church has made inroads upon the life of our communities, cities, and the world, so that localities are valued according to the stand- ard of life there lived. The progress of science in its several departments is the wonder of the age, and with literature and general edification holding pace, all of these amply show forth what society is and the standard of its attainment along cultural lines. How rarely people stop to consider how much more com- fortable we now live than men did in the days of old. What benefits are ours in comparison to those of even the Czsars. The enlarging sense of obligation to all mankind is changing the character of our aspirations as a people, and is expressing itself in plans to secure equal rights to all, to bring about a fairer distribution of wealth, to conserve the natural resources for all citizens, in industrial, political and social affairs. All this argues well for the betterment of the world, and it is thus acknowl- edged, providing we see only this side of the canvas. Reducing civilization then to its simplest terms, society is built around five great institutions :—the Home—social; the State—political; the Shop—commercial; the School—educational; and the Church— religious. Thus the application of the Christian new commandment to this wide field and range of experience is eclipsing all former awakenings in history. To one who studies the individual as Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? 145 moved to be a brother to his fellow men, and society as being leavened by this spirit, many things important for men to know are clamoring to be spoken. Religion for such has ceased to be the exclusive interest of churches. It is no longer a single factor in society. It is life itself. It gives a mission to every family. It dignifies all honorable business. It imparts a vision to politics, and it awakens in each one the question, “how can I best serve my fellow men?” But whence this humanitarianism, this new teaching, this new spirit of physical, ethical and psychical development? Is it the result of mere philosophizing? Can the science of sociology here claim originality? Is it a natural sequence of society to develop and practice such principles of its own accord? W. L. Alexander argues well, when he says that “the writings of many great thinkers of the ages are still in our libraries and we call them classics. We value them for what we think they are worth. But over whom do they rule? By whom are their authors reverenced and worshipped? We may delight our in- tellects with the hard keen reasoning of an Aristotle, or our souls with the sublime conceptions and dulcet words of a Plato; but what man in his senses would now profess himself an Aristotelian or Platonist? Their power has long since passed away; their scepters are broken, and to most men, even in civilized countries, they are nothing but names. But Jesus Christ is still in our midst as a living power. Men believe in Him, receive His teachings, confide their highest in- terests into His hands, love Him with an all-mastering love, and, if need be, are ready to sacrifice even life itself for His sake. And if we have yet to expect a further development of thought which is to supersede Christianity, why has it been so long in coming? Centuries have passed, and yet no sign of its approach is to be seen. Is not the world’s last and only impetus and sal- vation Jesus Christ, or, without Him a dark and hopeless noth- ing?” Can it be possible that all the aspirations of men with this “aim 146 Shall Jesus Find Faith on Earth? at improvement” on the part of civilization in general as its im- petus, are so much dependent upon this divine personage? Who otherwise gave it this tendency? Would it be possible to sup- pose a Christless world?