Wwi.24 
 
 
 
 LIBRARY OF THE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY 
 
 PRINCETON, N. J. 
 
 HN 30) 3G6.44-4-53 
 Conference on Christian 
 
 politics, economics and 
 The home 
 
C.0.P.E.C. Commission Reports. Volume III 
 
 THE HOME 
 
C.0.P.E.C, COMMISSION 
 REPORTS 
 
 VotumMEI, Tue Nature or Gop anp His 
 PurPosE FOR THE WoRLD 
 II. Epucation 
 
 Tue Home 
 IV. Tue Revation oF THE SEXES 
 
 LEISURE 
 
 Tue TREATMENT OF CRIME 
 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 
 CHRISTIANITY AND WAR 
 INDUSTRY AND PROPERTY 
 Pouirics AND CITIZENSHIP 
 
 Tue Socrat FuncrTion oF 
 THE CHURCH 
 
 HisroricaL ILLusTRATIONS 
 OF THE SocrAL EFFECTs 
 OF CHRISTIANITY 
 
 
 
 First published. . . April 1924 
 Second Impression ; . July 1924 
 
THE HOME 
 
 i 
 Being the Report presented to the Conference on 
 Christian Politics, Economics and Citizenship 
 
 at Birmingham, April 5-12, 1924 
 
 Published for the Conference Committee by 
 
 LONGMANS, GREEN AND CO. 
 39 PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON, E.C. 4 
 NEW YORK, TORONTO 
 BOMBAY, CALCUTTA, AND MADRAS 
 
 1924 
 
BASIS 
 
 Tue basis of this Conference is the conviction 
 that the Christian faith, rightly interpreted and 
 consistently followed, gives the vision and the 
 power essential for solving the problems of to-day, 
 that the social ethics of Christianity have been 
 greatly neglected by Christians with disastrous 
 consequences to the individual and to society, and 
 that it is of the first importance that these should 
 be given a clearer and more persistent emphasis. 
 In the teaching and work of Jesus Christ there are » 
 certain fundamental principles—such as the universal 
 Fatherhood of God with its corollary that mankind 
 is God’s family, and the law “ that whoso loseth his 
 life, findeth it ”’—which, if accepted, not only 
 condemn much in the present organisation of 
 society, but show the way of regeneration. Christi- 
 anity has proved itself to possess also a motive power 
 for the transformation of the individual, without 
 which no change of policy or method can succeed. 
 In the light of its principles the constitution of 
 society, the conduct of industry, the upbringing 
 of children, national and international politics, the 
 personal relations of men and women, in fact all 
 human relationships, must be tested. It is hoped 
 that through this Conference the Church may win 
 a fuller understanding of its Gospel, and hearing 
 
 a clear call to practical action may find courage 
 to obey. 
 
GENERAL PREFACE 
 
 THE present volume forms one of the series of 
 Reports drawn up for submission to the Conference 
 on Christian Politics, Economics and Citizenship, 
 held in Birmingham in April 1924. 
 
 In recent years Christians of all denominations 
 have recognised with increasing conviction that 
 the commission to ‘‘go and teach all nations ” 
 involved a double task. Alongside of the work of 
 individual conversion and simultaneously with it 
 an effort must be made to Christianise the corporate 
 life of mankind in all its activities. Recent de- 
 velopments since the industrial revolution, the vast 
 increase of population, the growth of cities, the 
 creation of mass production, the specialisation of 
 effort, and the consequent interdependence of 
 individuals upon each other, have given new sig- 
 nificance to the truth that we are members one of 
 another. ‘The existence of a system and of methods 
 unsatisfying, if not antagonistic to Christian life, 
 constitutes a challenge to the Church. The work 
 of a number of pioneers during the past century 
 has prepared the way for the attempt to examine 
 and test our social life in the light of the principles 
 revealed in Jesus Christ, and to visualise the require- 
 ments of a Christian civilisation. Hitherto such 
 attempts have generally been confined to one or 
 two aspects of citizenship; and, great as has been 
 
 Vv 
 
GENERAL PREFACE 
 
 their value, they have plainly shown the defects of 
 sectional study. We cannot Christianise life in 
 compartments: to reform industry involves the 
 reform of education, of the home life, of politics 
 and of international affairs. What is needed is not 
 a number of isolated and often inconsistent plans 
 appropriate only to a single department of human 
 activity, but an ideal of corporate life constructed 
 on consistent principles and capable of being applied 
 to and fulfilled in every sphere. 
 
 The present series of Reports is a first step in 
 this direction. Each has been drawn up by a 
 Commission representative of the various denomina- 
 tions of British Christians, and containing not only 
 thinkers and students, but men and women of large 
 and differing practical experience. Our endeavour 
 has been both to secure the characteristic contri- 
 butions of each Christian communion so as to gain. 
 a vision of the Kingdom of God worthy of our 
 common faith, and also to study the application of 
 the gospel to actual existing conditions—to keep 
 our principles broad and clear and to avoid the 
 danger of Utopianism. We should be the last to 
 claim any large or general measure of success. ‘The 
 task is full of difficulty: often the difficulties have 
 seemed insurmountable. | 
 
 But as it has proceeded we have discovered an 
 unexpected agreement, and a sense of fellowship 
 so strong as to make fundamental divergences, where 
 they appeared, matters not for dispute but for frank 
 and sympathetic discussion. Our Reports will not 
 be in any sense a final solution of the problems with 
 which they are concerned. They represent, we 
 
 vl 
 
GENERAL PREFACE 
 
 believe, an honest effort to see our corporate life 
 steadily and whole from the standpoint of Christi- 
 anity; and as such may help to bring to many a 
 clearer and more consistent understanding of that 
 Kingdom for which the Church longs and labours 
 and prays. 
 
 However inadequate our Reports may appear— 
 and in view of the magnitude of the issues under 
 discussion and the infinite grandeur of the Christian 
 gospel inadequacy is inevitable—we cannot be too 
 thankful for the experience of united inquiry and 
 study and fellowship of which they are the fruit. 
 
 It should be understood that these Reports are 
 printed as the Reports of the Commissions only, 
 and any resolutions adopted by the Conference on 
 the basis of these Reports will be found in The 
 Proceedings of C.O.P.E.C., which also contains a 
 General Index to the series of Reports. 
 
 vil 
 
. wy wey : real rem! 7 
 if 
 
 di 1 tee er Ue V) Pom ars aur . 
 
 ie, f Geer oh ta he CN ite 
 hoa Lace Ce 
 
 one ayy ay ny Ts fies oat 
 
 ay ee ui ps ee") ae, 4 a tie 
 
 ‘aaeM Rie as 
 r f yz tage que 
 . as , i i 4 ; Ss , Ns | 
 Ms ae eS iy ei A) ee ee wee Hie ny ua) 
 Hike RAMA he: tilich. 
 
 
 
LIST OF COMMISSION MEMBERS 
 
 The Commission responsible for the production of this Report 
 was constituted as follows. 
 
 Chairman :—Capt. R. L. REISS. 
 
 Chairman of Executive of Garden Cities Association; 
 Director of Welwyn Garden City Ltd., and Hampstead 
 Garden City Trust, Ltd. 
 
 Members of the Commission :— 
 
 BLAKE, Tue Rev. Dr. Bucuanan, B.D., D.D. 
 
 Fellow of the University of Bombay; United Free Church 
 of Scotland Minister; Author of works on the Old Testa- 
 ment Prophets and The Meaning of Suffering. 
 
 CADBURY, Mrs. Groraes, M.A., O.B.E. 
 
 Chairman of the Bournville Village Housing Trust; Bir- 
 mingham City Councillor; Chairman of the School Medical 
 Service Committee of the Birmingham Education Authority ; 
 President of the Midland Division of the Y.W.C.A. and of 
 the Union of Girls’ Clubs; Vice-President of the N.C.W.W.; 
 Convener of Peace Committee of the International Council 
 of Women. 
 
 CALDER, Miss MarGARET S. 
 Director of Helensburgh Dwellings Co. 
 
 DEVAS, Mrs. B. W. 
 
 EAGAR, W. MW’G., Esg. 
 Secretary of the Garden Cities and Town Planning Associa- 
 tion; Chairman of the Federation of London Settlements. 
 
 FITZ-GERALD, Miss Marton, 
 
 Member of Manchester Women’s Advisory Committee on 
 Housing; formerly Sanitary Inspector and Health Visitor 
 for Woolwich; Joint Author of The Smokeless City. 
 
 1x 
 
LIST OF COMMISSION MEMBERS 
 
 GLOVER, Mrs.’ ARNOLD. 
 
 Formerly Member of London School Board; a Founder 
 of the National Organisation of Girls’ Clubs, and Dining 
 Centres for Working Girls, Ltd.; Governor of Chelsea 
 Polytechnic and of the County Secondary School, Fulham ; 
 Member of the Council of the W.E.A. and of the Mary Ward 
 Settlement. 
 
 JEFFREY, Miss M. M. 
 Crown Receiver, H.M. Office of Woods and Forests. 
 
 McKERROW, Mrs., M.A. 
 
 Ex-President ie Glasgow Women’s Citizens Association ; 
 Member of Home Mission Committee of the United Free 
 Church of Scotland. 
 
 WRELLY OA. RS so, McA. 
 Travelling Secretary of C.O.P.E.C. 
 
 PELLY, Mrs. AwR. 
 PIERCY, Mrs. W. 
 
 REASON, THE Rev. W., M.A. 
 Organising Secretary of the Christian Social Crusade. 
 
 SANDERSON-FURNISS, Mrs. 
 J.P. for Oxfordshire. 
 
 TAYLER, THE Rev. J. LIonEt, M.R.C.S. 
 Unitarian Minister, Leicester; Author of The Stages of 
 Human Life; formerly University Extension Lecturer on 
 Sociology and Biology. 
 
 UNWIN, Raymonp, Esg., F.R.I.B.A. 
 Chief Architect to the Ministry of Health, dealing with 
 Housing and Town Planning; Past President of Town 
 Planning Institute and Doctor of Technical Science at 
 Prague. 
 
 WISE, Mrs. E. F., M.A.(Lonp.). 
 Formerly lived and worked in East London. 
 
 The Members of the Commission are greatly indebted to the 
 Rev. W. F. Howard and Mr. Pite for material contributed to the 
 Report. They also wish to acknowledge information afforded by 
 the Reports of Study Circles on the Questionnaire on ‘‘ The Home.” 
 
CONTENTS 
 
 Basis. : A : ! 3 1 4 
 
 GENERAL PREFACE . : : i : ; 
 
 List or MEMBERS OF COMMISSION ; i : 4 
 CHAPTER I 
 
 A GENERAL SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT . ; ‘ ’ 
 
 The family and the home: universal institutions—The attitude 
 of Jesus and the influence of Christianity on the home— 
 Christian obligations towards social abuses 
 
 CHAPTER II 
 
 Tue Famity 1n THE Home 2 ‘ , 
 
 The importance of family relations —The home, the natural 
 unit of power—The Christian home with love as its basis— 
 Causes of home-making—The spirit of approach to marriage— 
 Some causes of difficulties in marriage—The importance of 
 frank discussion between husband and wife 
 
 CHAPTER III 
 
 PARENTS AND CHILDREN . 
 
 . e e. ° 
 
 The home, a training-ground for the Kingdom of God—Parents’ 
 attitude towards children—The development of character: per- 
 sonal, social and religious—The relations of children to parents 
 and the Church’s part therein 
 
 CHAPTER IV 
 
 Tue FAMILY AND THE CoMMUNITY . ‘ ; 
 
 The attitude of the family towards outside interests—Class 
 
 distinctions—Domestic service—What the family contributes to 
 
 the community, and what the community contributes to the 
 
 family . 
 xi 
 
 a 
 
 37 
 
 51 
 
CONTENTS 
 
 ei CHAPTER V 
 
 Tue CuristiAN HomME AND THE FuTurE OF THE WoRLD. 
 
 The vision of the part the home can play in the world—Aspects 
 to be stressed 
 
 CHAPTER VI 
 
 7 
 Hovusrts AND Homes d : ‘ : A : 
 
 The facts of the present housing shortage—The moral results— 
 The problem of solving the shortage—The required house and 
 its surroundings—The duty of individual citizens 
 
 CHAPTER VII 
 
 THe PLANNING oF Towns - ; P 
 
 The need for forethought—The problem of the large town and 
 of abolishing slums—Transport difficulties and the need for 
 new towns 
 
 CHAPTER VIII 
 
 RicHEs AND PovEerTY IN THE HomeE . i ; ; 
 
 The causes of poverty—-Low wages, unemployment, sickness, 
 intemperance, old age—The danger of riches—The fallacy of 
 luxury spending 
 
 CHAPTER IX 
 
 Tue CoMMUNITY, THE PARENT AND THE CHILD . ‘ 
 
 Legislation affecting children—The State as “ over-parent”’ 
 
 CHAPTER X 
 
 MotTHErRs AND BaBIEs : ‘ : ‘ ; , 
 
 The difficulties of mothers—Maternity—Ilness—Large families 
 —Infant Welfare—What is already being done—The need for 
 further provision—Motherhood endowment—* Home helps” 
 
 CHAPTER XI 
 
 CoNCLUSIONS . i i : : ‘ : ; 
 
 Summary and resolutions 
 
 xii 
 
 PAG) 
 
 61 
 
 65 
 
 95 
 
 107 
 
 123 
 
 133 
 
 149 
 
CHAPTER’ I 
 A GENERAL SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT 
 

 
CHAPTER I 
 A GENERAL SURVEY OF THE SUBJECT 
 
 A tarcE number of the replies to the question- 
 naire on the Home show that it has received full 
 consideration by a great many people. The replies 
 have been carefully examined and collated. ‘The 
 subject matter of the questionnaire was extremely 
 wide, and the Report which we have prepared has 
 not attempted to follow exactly the lines adopted 
 in the questions, still less the order of arrangement. 
 We believe, however, that in the pages which follow 
 a consideration will be found of all the more impor- 
 tant questions raised. In our Report we discuss the 
 application of Christian principles to the vital 
 relations of husband and wife, of parent and child, 
 and of the family as a whole to the community of 
 which it is part. ‘The problems before us, therefore, 
 concern personal, political and social morality. Thus, 
 the housing question, which is often considered only 
 from the point of view of health and comfort, must 
 in our view be considered first in its bearing upon 
 the whole life of the family in the spiritual as well 
 as the material sphere. 
 
 Our ideas about family relations and home life, 
 and the duties of the community towards housing 
 and kindred subjects, require overhauling and revis- 
 ing from a definitely Christian*standpoint. ‘here 
 
 3 
 
THE HOME 
 
 has always been the need for such a revision, but 
 it is more necessary than ever to-day. Since the 
 Industrial Revolution, life has become more and 
 more complex, both for the individual and for the 
 community, and during the latter part of the nine- 
 teenth and in the present century this complexity 
 has grown almost overwhelming. It has increased 
 rapidly along with the development of science and 
 invention. ‘The whole pace of life and the currents 
 of human thought have quickened. ‘To-day we are 
 faced with problems affecting our relations with each 
 other which were scarcely contemplated one hundred 
 years ago. ‘The great European War, while not the 
 primary cause of the intricacy of those problems, 
 undoubtedly accentuated the uncertainty and doubt 
 in which a large number of people find themselves. 
 ‘That many hundreds of thousands of men left their 
 homes and went to distant parts of the world for a 
 long period of time had in itself a profound influence. 
 The principal effect of the war in this connection 
 was, perhaps, the huge shock that it gave to Society. 
 
 The fact that in every generation ideas change 
 substantially, inevitably produces conflict between 
 the comparatively old and the young. We all 
 remember the constant reiteration by our elders of 
 the warnings, “‘ When I was a child I was never 
 allowed to do this or that, or to speak to my parents 
 in such a way,” and their mournful regrets concern- 
 ing the disappearance of “the sanctity of married 
 life,” or “‘ the decay of family life.” Such phrases 
 
 are by no means peculiar to our own time. 
 
GENERAL SURVEY 
 
 Four FuNDAMENTAL QuEsTIons PRropouNDED 
 
 We have attempted to answer four fundamental 
 questions : 
 
 1. What demands are made on the family by con- 
 siderations of the spiritual welfare of its 
 individual members? 
 
 2. What demands are made on the individual 
 members of a family by considerations of 
 its welfare as a spiritual unit? 
 
 3. In what way can a family as an institution be 
 of the greatest benefit to the community, 
 or, in other words, to what extent can it 
 contribute to the establishment upon earth 
 of the Kingdom of God? 
 
 4. What demands are made on the community 
 by the-duty of providing for the wholesome 
 development of family life? 
 
 The fourth question differs essentially from the 
 first three, because any adequate answer to it in- 
 volves consideration of the character and environ- 
 ment of the home in so far as these are conditioned 
 by the activities or inactivities of the community 
 rather than by the tastes and ideals of the family. 
 The issues raised by the fourth question are con- 
 sidered in Chapters VI to X, and it should here 
 perhaps be phrased more explicitly by putting it as 
 follows : 
 
 What opportunities are within the reach of the 
 average family for realising the ideals of family 
 life? What are the material conditions which pre- 
 vent such realisation, and what efforts to improve 
 
 5 
 
THE HOME 
 
 those conditions are incumbent upon us all as 
 members of the community ? 
 
 All four questions raise a number of subsidiary 
 and related questions with which we have been 
 compelled to deal. Some of them, however, involve 
 the subject-matter of other Commissions. In a 
 highly developed social order such as that in which 
 we live, any adequate discussion of the family and 
 the home really covers the whole field of human 
 relations. So far as it is possible, we have indicated 
 the points at which the issues we have raised are 
 dealt with in greater detail by other Commissions, 
 particularly the Commissions dealing with sex, 
 education, and industry and property. We have 
 attempted ourselves to specialise upon those issues 
 which are more obviously raised by our immediate 
 reference. 
 
 Tue Famity AND Home: UNIvErRsAL INSTITUTIONS 
 
 ‘The family and the home are institutions common 
 to all countries and races with any degree of civilisa- 
 tion. ‘There are obvious biological reasons why the 
 family as an institution is bound to continue in 
 some form or other. as long as the human race exists. 
 From time to time, philosophers, from Plato to 
 Mir. H. G. Wells, have suggested the possibility that 
 children might be regarded as the children of the 
 State and entirely divorced from parental care and 
 parental control. So far, however, history shows us 
 no example of the success of such an experiment, 
 and in our view it is unlikely and undesirable that 
 
 the contingency should ever arise. It would imply, 
 6 
 
GENERAL SURVEY 
 
 among other things, the disappearance of any per- 
 manent union of husband and wife. But, though 
 the family is an abiding human institution, its 
 character and the relations of its members have from 
 time to time changed in the course of history. While 
 many abuses and many evils have resulted from 
 family life, there can be no doubt that on the whole 
 its influence has been of the greatest benefit to the 
 human race. It is easy to talk of its ‘‘ decay,” but 
 on a broad interpretation of history we believe that 
 the family relations have evolved in such a way as 
 to show a marked improvement. As stated above, 
 there are always arising fresh ideas and changes in 
 social customs which are apt to cause jars and con- 
 flicts between the older and the younger generation. 
 The elder in practically every period has usually 
 assumed that it was right and that the younger 
 people were tending to destroy either family life or 
 something else that seemed equally important. 
 And yet family life continues. 
 
 Undoubtedly the simplest and most familiar social 
 unit is the family, and, as has been frequently 
 pointed out, it is also the most rich in potential 
 Christianity. Our Lord Himself used the word 
 “ Father ” as the most satisfactory symbol of a loving 
 God, and the word “ children” as the best expres- 
 sion of what our relation should be to Him. In 
 recent times, whenever the members of a social 
 organisation have desired to emphasise in words the 
 closeness of the bond of union between them, they 
 have usually adopted the word “ brother,” and this 
 word has stood for the higher social ideal. “Thus it 
 is in common use among members of friendly 
 
 7 
 
THE HOME 
 
 societies, of trade unions, of Masonic lodges and of 
 religious communities, to say nothing of the bodies 
 which are actually called brotherhoods and sister- 
 hoods. “The Fatherhood .of God and _ the 
 brotherhood of man” is one of the most cherished 
 phrases of our time. It expresses the faith that the 
 solidarity and co-operation which we learnt in family 
 life will yet ee common in our wider social 
 relations. { 
 
 INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY ON THE FAMILY 
 
 In the earlier stages of civilisation the family was. 
 not, even in theory, held together mainly by love. 
 Prof. Rauschenbusch says, “ In its early stages the 
 patriarchal family, from which our own family organ- 
 isation was derived, was held together by stern force 
 and selfishness quite as much as by love and kinship. 
 Wives were dragged off as the booty of war or pur- 
 chased. A patriarch with a lot of wives was a 
 capitalist and became rich on the surplus value they 
 created for him. His sons were his fighting outfit 
 with which he gained and protected his wealth and 
 property.” + Moreover, in more primitive com- 
 munities the economic nexus between the members 
 of the family was a strong one. The head of the 
 family directed its work and allotted its gocds. 
 He was the household priest and ‘the ruler and 
 judge over his own.” Custom, which gradually 
 acquired the force of law, upheld his despotic power. 
 In fact the law was made and the precedent set by 
 
 1 Christianizing the Social Order, by Prof. Rauschenbusch, 
 Professor of Church History, Rochester, U.S.A. 
 8 
 
- GENERAL SURVEY 
 
 him and his peers. He could divorce his wife or 
 
 ring in other women to share her privileges, and, 
 if she was unfaithful to him, he could kill her. On 
 the other hand, she had no corresponding claim on 
 his fidelity, for he had the right to do as he liked. 
 Over his children also he had the power of life and 
 death. Whether we examine the dawn of Eastern 
 civilisation in India or among the Israelites, or the 
 early history of Rome and Greece, we find similar 
 conditions prevailing. 
 
 The Old Testament gives us an intimate insight 
 into a number of families, either as they actually 
 lived or as later tradition imagined them. ‘The 
 family relations of Jacob, David and other famous 
 personages in Biblical history were such that no 
 self-respecting Church could retain them as members 
 if they acted in the same way to-day. Gradually, 
 however, as civilisation progressed, there was a slow 
 decrease in despotism and exploitation. As time 
 went on the wife gained an assured legal status. 
 When polygamy ceased and adultery was considered 
 a crime in man as well as in woman, the basis was 
 laid for real equality between man and wife. The 
 relation between father and children also grew less 
 autocratic. The killing of children by the father 
 became rare, then illegal, and finally a crime. 
 Instead of exploiting them for his own enrichment, 
 the father has learnt to sacrifice himself for their 
 education and advancement. Correspondingly, their 
 legal status has changed. 
 
 Since the dawn of the Christian era there has 
 been a great improvement in actual family relations 
 as well as in the ideal of what such relations should 
 
 a 
 
THE HOME 
 
 be. Continually, however, obstructive forces have 
 warred against the attainment of that ideal, and 
 periods of progress have been followed by reactions. 
 Sometimes the reactions have been due to mis- 
 guided attempts to enforce a rigid code upon people 
 not prepared to accept it. It is no matter of chance 
 that the Puritanism of the Cromwellian period was 
 immediately succeeded by the laxity of the Restora- 
 tion. ‘Those who complain to-day of the decay of 
 family life should recall the apparent acquiescence 
 of a large proportion of the population in the family 
 relations of Henry VIII, Charles II and George IV. 
 
 Speaking broadly, the character of the family has. 
 passed through a slow ethical transformation. ‘The 
 despotism of man, fortified by law, custom and 
 economic possession, has passed into an approximate 
 equality between husband and wife, and children 
 have become the free companions of their parents. 
 Here Christianity has continually been on the side 
 of progress. ‘Io say this, however, does not mean 
 that Christian living has become automatic in the 
 family and requires no religious effort. It is still 
 one of the greatest triumphs of personality to make 
 the home an abiding sanctuary of love, peace and 
 beauty. The number of families which achieve any 
 measure of success in this is still small. But yet the 
 family as we know it to-day claims from even selfish 
 and wayward individuals some measure of decency 
 and love. As Prof. Rauschenbusch says, “‘ The fact 
 that the institution as such has been Christianised 
 predisposes the individuals living in it to be Christian. 
 If they are personally temperate, loving and swayed 
 
 by religious convictions and duties, they will find 
 10 
 
GENERAL SURVEY 
 
 the family responsive to their highest desires. If 
 they are not, they will at least find it a restraining 
 and disciplinary influence.” 
 
 Our Lorp’s TEACHING ON THE SUBJECT 
 
 In the Gospels there are practically no sayings 
 of our Lord which point out directly the duty of 
 parents to children or children to parents, though 
 He deals with the relation of husband and wife and 
 emphasises the indissoluble nature of their union. 
 There is much, however, in our Lord’s teaching 
 which indicates His fundamental assumptions in 
 regard to the family. His constant use of the 
 phrases “ Father,” “Son” and “ Brother” show 
 that He regarded the family relation as being the 
 best way of exhibiting the new outlook and duty 
 both in regard to God and man. / Moreover, the 
 story of His stay as a child at Jerusalem for discussion 
 with the Doctors and of His subsequent action is 
 significant. While, on the one hand, He said to His 
 parents, “ Wist ye not that I must be about My 
 Father’s business?”? and apparently made no 
 apology, on the other hand it is recorded that He 
 subsequently went home with them “ and was sub- 
 ject to them.” One of His last actions was to 
 entrust His mother to the care of His favourite 
 disciple. 
 
 In the matter of family relations, as elsewhere, our 
 Lord “came not to destroy the law but to fulfil it.” 
 He found a considerable degree of co-operation and 
 love between the members of families. On the 
 
 basis of His own experience, He was able to make 
 1 
 
THE HOME 
 clear the Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood 
 
 of mankind, but many of His sayings recorded in the 
 Gospels indicate His realisation of the inevitable 
 conflict which would often arise between the claims 
 of the family and the claims of God.” Thus, His 
 reply to the disciple who said, “‘ Lord, suffer me to 
 go and bury my father,” was, “ Follow Me, and let 
 the dead bury their dead.”’ In the directions to the 
 apostles regarding their missionary enterprises He 
 made it clear that their message would cause family 
 feuds. /‘‘ The brother shall deliver up the brother 
 to death, and the father his child, and children shall 
 rise up against parents and cause them to be put to > 
 death.” And again, “‘He that loveth father or 
 mother more than Me is not worthy of Me, and 
 he that loveth son or daughter more than Me is not 
 worthy of Me.” When He was talking to the people 
 and someone said, “ Behold, Thy mother and Thy 
 brethren stand without desiring to speak with Thee,” 
 He answered, “‘ Who is My mother and who are My 
 brethren?” ‘Then, pointing to His disciples, He 
 added, ‘‘ Behold My mother and My brethren, for 
 whosoever shall do the will of My Father who is in 
 heaven, the same is My brother and sister and 
 mother.” Later He said, ‘‘ There is no man that 
 hath left house, or brethren, or sisters, or mother, 
 or father, or children, or lands, for My sake, but he 
 shall receive an hundredfold now in this time, and 
 in the world to come eternal life.” 
 
 The lessons to be drawn from the records of the 
 Gospels seem to be as follows: In the first place 
 our Lord regarded the family relations as those 
 
 which most clearly revealed the spirit of love. Basing 
 12 
 
GENERAL: SURVEY 
 
 His teaching on this fact, He declared that family 
 love must be extended to the greater family of the 
 whole human race. ‘The love of brothers must not 
 merely be the love of blood relations, but of all men, 
 for all men are brothers, and we are ‘all sons of Garr 
 In the second place He made it clear that His own 
 claims and those of the family would often be in 
 opposition, and that when they clashed the latter 
 must not be allowed to interfere with the higher 
 call. Obviously, therefore, the ideal family life is 
 that which gives to its members the best training for 
 broader co-operation as members of the large family _ 
 of the human race. As St. Paul said, “If a man 
 know not how to rule his own house, Hen shall he 
 
 take care of the Church of God? ” 
 
 THe FAMILY AND THE HOME NOT ENDS IN 
 THEMSELVES 
 
 Much confusion has arisen from a failure to recog- 
 nise that the family and the home are social institu- 
 tions which must not be regarded as ends in them- 
 selves. Again, many conflicts have arisen because 
 some parents have endeavoured to exercise despotic 
 powers over their children and to bring them up in 
 their own image. There has, moreover, been a 
 frequent tendency to interpret the proverb,“ Charity 
 begins at home,” as if it had been “ Charity begins 
 and ends at home.” It was the danger of this which 
 led Bacon to say, with that profound knowledge of 
 human nature which characterises his writings, “A 
 single life doth well with Churchmen; for Charity 
 will hardly water the ground where it must first 
 
 13 
 
THE HOME 
 filla pool.” Many people although called Christians 
 
 have neglected to seek for others what they have 
 constantly sought for themselves, and have made 
 demands quite incompatible with our Lord’s own 
 teaching. As we have already pointed out, Christ 
 made it quite clear that where there was a conflict 
 between the claims of parents and His own claim, the 
 latter must prevail, and that if necessary people must 
 leave father and mother for His sake. Yet we find 
 well-to-do ladies regarding it as entirely wrong for 
 their daughters to leave home in order to undertake 
 social work in the poorer districts of our large towns 
 or missionary work in the foreign field, although they 
 are quite content to have other people’s daughters 
 leave home and live in their houses as nurse-maids 
 or scullery-maids. Unless we regard the family life 
 as a means to an end rather than an end in itself, 
 we shall never be able to reconcile our duty to the 
 members of our family with our duty to God and the 
 community. While we are far from accepting the 
 many strictures which Mr. Bernard Shaw has made 
 on the subject of the family and “ the family ideal,” 
 and while the beginning of the following quotation 
 is no doubt over-stated, there is an important truth 
 contained in the latter part of it. In the famous 
 preface on “‘ Parents and Children ” he says: “ The 
 family ideal is a humbug and a nuisance: one might 
 as reasonably talk of the barrack ideal, or the fore- 
 castle ideal, or any other substitution of the 
 machinery of social organisation for the end of it, 
 which must always be the fullest and most capable 
 life: in short, the most godly life. And this 
 significant word reminds us that though the popular 
 14 
 
GENERAL SURVEY 
 
 conception of heaven includes a Holy Family, it 
 does not attach to that family the notion of a separate 
 home, or a private nursery or kitchen, or mother- 
 in-law, or anything that constitutes the family as 
 we know it. Even blood relationship is miraculously 
 abstracted from it; and the Father is the father of 
 all children, the Mother the mother of all mothers 
 and babies, and the Son the Son of Man and the 
 Saviour of His brothers : one whose chief utterance 
 on the subject of the conventional family was an 
 invitation to all of us to leave our families and follow 
 
 Him.” 
 
 Tue Home THE TRAINING GROUND FOR CHRISTIAN 
 
 LIFE 
 
 We have tried in our Report to interpret the 
 teaching of our Lord in so far as it concerns the 
 relations of members of the family to one another 
 and to the community. ‘The family as an institu- 
 tion can be of the greatest possible value if its 
 members attempt to learn forbearance and co- 
 operation in their mutual life, and also try to apply 
 the lessons so learnt to their dealings with their 
 neighbours and to their public activities. But the 
 family often fails to be a good school because some 
 member of it acts with selfishness or despotism. For 
 instance, the attitude of parents towards their 
 children should be one in which their own interests 
 are subordinated. ‘Their desires should be only 
 to secure the children’s interests and help them 
 take their part in the greater work which they 
 are called upon to do for the community. The 
 
 15 
 
THE HOME 
 
 lack of realisation of this truth has caused many 
 conflicts. 
 
 After considering the relations of the members 
 of the family to each other, and trying to arrive at 
 some kind of conclusion with regard to the ideal 
 family life, we are led inevitably to a discussion of 
 the material conditions which make such a life 
 possible. If all men are our brothers, then we 
 should try to secure for them what we would try to 
 secure for those who belong to our own families. 
 This will involve, not merely the extension of a spirit 
 of brotherhood towards our personal acquaint- 
 ances, nor what is commonly called charity, or 
 vaguely termed “social work.” It will involve 
 political action. We have reached the stage at 
 which we cannot hope to satisfy the essential 
 material requirements of human beings merely 
 through the medium of charity. We must estab- 
 lish a community which will banish want and 
 poverty, and give to each of its members adequate 
 opportunities for a full and vigorous life. 
 
 In saying this we do not for one moment imply 
 that the ideals of family life can never be realised 
 except where material conditions are satisfactory. 
 Indeed we all know how magnificently these are 
 overcome. Yet undoubtedly material conditions 
 play a tremendous part in creating unnecessary 
 difficulties and obstacles. Whether looked on from 
 the standpoint of those who are in comfortable 
 circumstances or from the standpoint of those who 
 are living in poverty or in slum areas, the existence 
 of such wide disparities of material surroundings and 
 
 circumstances 1S a serious menace to our common 
 16 
 
GENERAL SURVEY 
 
 life. In some cases children have no proper chance 
 physically because their parents are too poor; in 
 other cases they have no chance morally because 
 their parents are too rich. Family life may be 
 ruined either by the inability of the head of the 
 family to obtain work or by the fact that he is 
 under no economic necessity to do any work what- 
 ever. Children may be neglected in one home 
 because their mother is always overworked, in another 
 because she spends her whole time in outside 
 amusements. 
 
 CHRISTIAN OBLIGATIONS TOWARDS SociAL ABUSES 
 
 We have, therefore, in the later chapters of our 
 Report considered in detail many of the important 
 social questions of our time—the results of the present 
 bad housing conditions, the failure to plan our towns 
 properly, the existence of poverty, the relationship 
 of the State to children and of the mother to Society, 
 and all the matters which profoundly affect home 
 life and family life. Here love and faith must take 
 control. ‘There is a definite Christian obligation 
 on everyone of us to see that the evils which sur- 
 round us are remedied. As we have already pointed 
 out, while much can be done by individual action, 
 the fundamental wrongs can only be attacked by 
 political and municipal legislation and administra- 
 tion. In future “ to take no part in politics ” must 
 be regarded as a breach of duty. Unless those who 
 represent us in Parliament and on Local Authorities 
 regard their obligations from a definitely Christian 
 
 standpoint, we shall never make real progress to- 
 C 17 
 
THE HOME 
 
 wards solving the social and economic questions 
 which so vitally affect the welfare of the popula- 
 tion. If they are to be solved, all those who pro- 
 fess and call themselves Christians must do every- 
 thing in their power to get the right representatives 
 upon national and local bodies. In no other way 
 is it possible to create the new social order of which 
 we dream and for which we hope. 
 
CHAP TERE 
 THE FAMILY IN THE HOME 
 
x 
 
 “735 
 
 ps 
 Be 
 
 + pat 
 
 
 
CHAPTER II 
 THE FAMILY IN THE HOME 
 
 Tue word “‘ home ”’ is often used for the building 
 in which a family, or even a single person, dwells, 
 but in the fuller sense it includes the dwellers 
 themselves and the life they live together. This is 
 the meaning we give it in the present chapter. In 
 the main we are considering the family home as the 
 normal unit which fulfils the great social functions 
 of continuing the race and bringing its children 
 through the long period of growth from infancy to 
 manhood and womanhood. 
 
 It is the function of the family to be the first and 
 most intimate group in the social life of humanity. 
 Within its home the individual personality can 
 unfold, and can learn the various forms of union 
 with other different and complementary personali- 
 ties; while around the home-centre wider contacts 
 with social and national life develop. 
 
 If the family unit is to give the best opportunity 
 to its members, and is to make its full contribution 
 to the larger society of its neighbourhood or its 
 nation, its life and its home must be beautiful. ee 
 
 The words Goodness, Truth and Beauty convey 
 great conceptions, and are not very easy to define 
 or to separate ; but they all have their place in the 
 
 complete family and home. Goodness implies the 
 21 
 
THE HOME 
 
 right impulsé of the individuals to live to the full 
 the life God has given them according to His Will; 
 Truth the only sound basis for the human contacts 
 and relations leading to beauty of life and ultimately 
 of material surroundings. Beauty is a spiritual 
 need, and without it we unconsciously starve our- 
 selves. ‘The conventions and restraints of the home, 
 so far as such may be needed, must be directed to 
 promote and maintain the degree of order and peace 
 without which beauty of life and home cannot be 
 secured. Not only should the home afford the 
 most favourable soil for the growth within it of 
 fine personality, but everyone who visits it from — 
 outside should go away conscious that contact has 
 been established with a home life which has itself 
 something to reveal, and to contribute to the 
 common stock. 
 
 This does not depend on luxury; it depends on 
 loving care for the details of the home, on thought 
 in their arrangement, and on taste in their selection ; 
 but perhaps more than anything else on a harmony 
 between the home and the life of the home. If the 
 life of the family is a good and beautiful life, nothing 
 will add more to the charm of the home than the 
 expression of its complete adaptation to that life, 
 however simple in its scale the life may be. Space 
 in the house and in each room, allotted to the work, 
 the culture, or the play, each according to the 
 family value set upon it ; colours, furniture, decora- 
 tions and ornaments, chosen because they, or their 
 associations, are loved by some or all of the family ; 
 these things lead to expressiveness, and, with a very 
 
 moderate endowment of taste, to beauty in the home. 
 22 
 
THE FAMILY IN THE HOME 
 
 Care for the life of the family and truth in express- 
 ing its habits do not demand or excuse the want of 
 equal care and consideration for the visitor, who may 
 be made to feel a true contact with the actual family 
 life without necessarily being made to share all the 
 sacrifices of comfort or luxury which the individual 
 standard of the particular family may cause it to 
 choose. In view of the imperfection of human 
 faculties some conventions and restraints are always 
 a necessary condition of social intercourse. ‘The 
 family should be the sphere in which these may be 
 the least irksome and the most fully understood. 
 As the sphere of contacts expands, conventions and 
 restraints must increase. Good manners in the 
 home and in society spring from a nice appreciation 
 of these conventions and an understanding of their 
 purpose, coupled with a desire to make them easily 
 complied with and fearlessly set aside when the 
 spirit of good relations clashes with the letter of 
 convention. 
 
 The home is a natural unit needing no_ higher 
 sanction than the very conditions which make it 
 possible. It is one of the greatest witnesses to the 
 nature of God. ‘There are, therefore, many beauti- 
 ful examples of home life outside the Christian 
 religion, but the force of centuries of Christian 
 example has combined with natural law to bring 
 something like the ideal we set out within the reach 
 of any two partners. 
 
 The home is the test of other social organisations 
 which, however far they deviate in practice from 
 its ideals, pay homage to them. ‘The “ father of 
 his country” is the ideal ruler. ‘‘ Patriotism ” 
 
 23 
 
THE HOME 
 
 and the “‘ mother country” are expressions that 
 show that man’s highest social hopes are in an 
 extension of the principles of the home to wider 
 associations. 
 
 Because of the primary quality and strength in 
 the institution of the family its relation to religion 
 is vital. ‘The regenerating power of religion in 
 other social organisations can at best be temporary, 
 if not entirely illusory, unless it is the foundation 
 of home life. But if religion is intimately related 
 to home life, it will spread, with the other influences 
 of the home, into all the wider associations of 
 men. | 
 Herein lies the importance of the Christian home. 
 Jesus came to fulfl. He accepted the home as a 
 natural organisation and filled it with spiritual 
 power. He showed that if Christian home life was 
 strong, Christian influences would prevail in the 
 world. 
 
 The foundation of religion is in the influence of 
 the home on children. Even those who would not 
 be termed religious at all are conscious that they 
 owe what religious ideas they have to what they 
 learnt in their homes. ‘The Church itself is con- 
 stantly and naturally being recruited from Christian 
 homes, and it is to the reality of the faith as seen 
 and taught there that we must look for the main 
 method of preserving and increasing its best life. 
 If the place and method of the home were 
 understood and taught, the foundation would be 
 truly laid for the structure of the new society and 
 the unit of power for its realisation discovered. 
 Whatever ideals the citizen is to have, whatever 
 
 24 
 
THE FAMILY IN THE HOME 
 
 principles he is instinctively to act upon, must first 
 be found in home life and in family relations. 
 
 The answer to the questions with which we are 
 faced is, therefore, of supreme importance. The 
 life and ordering of the Christian home must be 
 the foundation of the whole Christian order of 
 Society. 
 
 The basis of the home must then be the same as 
 the basis of Christianity—Love. Without love the 
 machinery of the simplest household breaks down ; 
 it cannot even fulfil its purely material functions 
 satisfactorily, and it certainly cannot be the leaven 
 of Christianity for the whole world. According to 
 the extent to which family life is governed by love 
 will the family fulfil its important part. 
 
 If the ideal of a home filled with such unselfish 
 love makes us conscious that we have all failed in 
 some degree—whether from selfishness or thought- 
 lessness or hypocrisy—it also shows the causes of 
 failure and the reasons why the average, ordinary 
 home is the source of so much strength, beauty and 
 healing. This is not, therefore, to set up a 
 practically impossible ideal. To think so is to 
 mistake utterly the purpose both of an ideal and of 
 Christianity. An ideal is not for condemning but 
 for leading into a healthy growth. 
 
 Love, it is true, means sacrifice; and the greater 
 the love the more acute will be the pain for all when 
 any member of the home suffers. Only a great 
 vision can make that sacrifice be accepted willingly. 
 But the Christian has that vision. Love is the 
 centre of his faith and it covers the whole field. 
 
 Failures of any kind or description in family relations 
 25 
 
THE HOME 
 
 and in the influence of home life rest at bottom on 
 lack of love. 
 
 To discuss the actual application of this rule of 
 love presents many difficulties. ‘There is a danger 
 of appearing to enunciate a series of platitudes 
 which are too obvious to need statement. We are 
 fully aware that much of what we say may appear 
 obvious. ‘This, however, does not remove the 
 necessity for stating it. Until we are able ourselves 
 to live in accordance with what we regard as obvious 
 truths, those truths must be reiterated and restated. 
 Again, the subject is so intimate and complicated 
 that our own views are inevitably coloured by the 
 homes we know. We cannot avoid this limitation. 
 Every reader will think of problems in family 
 relations known to himself and judge how the 
 universal law of love should be applied in particular 
 cases. He may also have studied family relations 
 in works of fiction—in such novels as Pendenuts, 
 Richard Feverel, The Forsyte Saga, etc.—and con- 
 sidered why the home described failed to be a 
 success. We cannot cover every circumstance 
 in family relations, and it is not so easy to depict 
 the family strength as the family weakness. Yet, if 
 family relations are as fundamental as we believe, 
 the subject is too vitally important to be passed 
 over without fuller comment. 
 
 We recognise that the causes of home-making are 
 complex. People act at least as much from instinct 
 as from reasoned purpose. ‘The desire to “ have a 
 home of one’s own” may have nothing to do with 
 marriage or parenthood, though it will gain in force 
 
 when these two come into play. It is the instinct for 
 26 
 
THE FAMILY IN THE HOME 
 
 self-realisation, which demands a place for the 
 expression of personal tastes and activities as well as 
 for privacy and retreat. 
 
 But the fullness of meaning requires, in addition 
 to these, the instincts for mating and for the making 
 of a family. These work together, but they are 
 sufficiently distinct for one or the other to be at 
 times practically lacking. In some communities it 
 is the rule rather than the exception for marriage to 
 be arranged without reference to “‘ romantic love ”’ ; 
 regard being given chiefly to the establishment of a 
 family. Conversely, there are many marriages 
 based on purely personal attraction with little or no 
 concern for the responsibilities of home-life and 
 parentage. It cannot in fairness be said that the 
 average results of the former are worse than those of 
 the latter; probably from the simple point of view 
 
 of “running a family establishment ” they may be 
 better. Sometimes, where the matching of personal 
 qualities has been fortunate, such marriages may 
 provide the ground from which a genuine love of 
 the best kind will spring. Similarly, the romantic 
 love may be wiser in its unpurposed selection than 
 any other mode of choice, though the results of its 
 mistakes may be the more tragic. But the home 
 can only find a really satisfactory embodiment when 
 both forces are working together. ‘There is no need 
 to stress the tragedy of a loveless marriage or a 
 loveless home. Physically it may meet some of 
 nature’s purposes, but spiritually it is a failure. 
 
 Romantic love is then a firm foundation if it 
 means more than mere mutual attraction. The 
 outlook of people approaching marriage need not be 
 
 27 
 
THE HOME 
 
 identical—for differences are often valuable—but 
 they do need to have a common vision of life and a 
 deep understanding of each other. They are 
 beginning a joint life whose influence is far-reaching 
 for them and for the world, and they should face 
 this fact. Above all they should know what marriage 
 means and how it requires the full co-operation of all 
 faculties—of body, mind and spirit. A great 
 responsibility rests, therefore, on their parents and 
 the home they have created. For parents to inter- 
 fere after the choice of a mate has been made is 
 generally useless. Jt is from the atmosphere of the 
 home, from the lessons learnt there of mutual 
 adjustment and forbearance and of the principles on 
 which the parents’ life is based, that the children 
 will come quite naturally to choose their right 
 partners. They will see the full significance of 
 marriage and what it means—the greatest oppor- 
 tunity both for self-realisation and joy and for 
 service. 
 
 Failures in married life are due to lack of love 
 or to encroachments by the enemies of love, such 
 as hypocrisy or selfishness. ‘They may also be due 
 to a misunderstanding of what love really means. 
 Both romantic love and the love of one’s house- 
 hold. may remain largely egoistic, a preoccupation 
 with one’s own emotions, an appropriation of 
 desired objects for the gratification of self, rather 
 than what our Lord taught as love. This, in the 
 words of the Apostle, is a love that “ seeketh not 
 its own,” but the good of those who are loved, and 
 finds its inspiration and its power in the love of 
 
 God in Christ for us. 
 28 
 
THE FAMILY IN THE HOME 
 
 Love is “a way of living.” Of its nature it 
 must grow and deepen; and the effort foreseen in 
 marriage must be continually kept up. If this is 
 realised, disappointment will not make the spirit 
 dissatisfied. Love is always exploring and seeking 
 a still fuller life; there are always more discoveries 
 to be made and more experiments to be tried. It is 
 too often forgotten that courtship should last as 
 long as life. Sometimes even ordinary sociability 
 and courtesy are left behind. 
 
 There are certain things for which everybody, 
 single as well as married, seeks in his or her own 
 home. They are quite legitimately looked for by 
 both husband and wife, but if demanded as rights 
 may be obtained only at the cost of clashing of 
 wills and the defeat of one or the other. In any 
 case, the fine flavour of the satisfaction will be 
 missed. But where love is watching to serve, not 
 only are the needs more fully met, but the true 
 home spirit finds embodiment. _ 
 
 It must, of course, be an intelligent service. 
 The husband who is relieved of all responsibility 
 in his own home on the ground that business cares 
 are sufficient for him to bear, or the wife who is 
 “* shielded from all anxiety,” is not so much served 
 as excluded from a great part of the other’s life. 
 
 The solicitude to save the other from all trouble 
 and pain is, in fact, often merely a subtle form of 
 selfishness ; it is not so much the other’s pain as 
 the effect of it upon ourselves that we want to 
 avoid. ‘The greater service is not to shield from 
 effort, pain or trouble which it is the other’s right 
 to bear, but by sharing it to help in its mastery. 
 
 2) 
 
THE HOME 
 
 With the grosser forms of selfishness which mar 
 family life and often wreck homes—such as brutality, 
 drunkenness and gambling—it is not necessary to 
 deal, but a spirit of giving is needed in great measure | 
 in all aspects of family relations. ‘This spirit is 
 more than unselfishness, for that is a purely negative 
 virtue. It is rather a positive joy—a natural part 
 of love—involving no conscious sacrifice, for we 
 rejoice to do it. Between husband and wife this 
 spirit will be in constant operation, and where there 
 are children the need for it is intensified. There is 
 of necessity a large amount of drudgery and irksome 
 work which easily leads to a sense of overstrain or 
 injustice unless the drudgery itself becomes trans- 
 muted into a thing of joy by the ordering of love 
 and by the help of the other partner. ‘lowards 
 and from the children this attitude must be 
 maintained, even to the time when they have 
 homes of their own or stay at home after they have 
 grown up. It means that parents will often see 
 events taking a different course from any they could 
 have foreseen or wished. Family life demands great 
 faith. 
 
 Some parents who have preferred to live a life 
 of simplicity first find real difficulty when their 
 children grow up. A conflict comes between the 
 parents’ ideals and the children’s material ad- 
 vantages. ‘The parents will realise that they should 
 not surrender their own ideals, just as they would 
 not wish the children to surrender theirs for them. 
 
 Nor must selfishness be allowed to envelop the 
 family itself as a unit. Neither the family nor 
 members of it should become so absorbed in itself 
 
 30 
 
THE FAMILY IN THE HOME 
 
 that it neglects to cultivate outside interests. The 
 home that concentrates solely on the welfare of its 
 own children to the exclusion of other children is 
 failing to see the vision of home life in relation 
 to humanity. It is not really Christian, just as, 
 on the other hand, there is something lacking in the 
 Christianity of those parents who are so engrossed 
 with world problems that their own homes are 
 excluded. ‘There may be a conflict of duties—both 
 extremes are bad. 
 
 One of the forms which selfishness takes is that 
 of jealousy, which is the outcome of the egoistic 
 element in romantic love. There is, of course, a 
 rightful exclusiveness in the relations of husband 
 and wife, but it is only achieved by giving and not 
 by demanding. We are here concerned, not with 
 the sins against love which violate that exclusive- 
 ness, but with the jealousy that presses it beyond 
 its rightful bounds. 
 
 This jealousy on the part of husband or wife may 
 view with suspicion all friends of the other sex 
 or even of the same. It may be oblivious to the 
 truth that the growth of personality in each requires 
 much greater variety of human association than any 
 one being can give to another, and that this varied 
 association does no violence to the sacred bond at 
 the centre. ‘The jealousy is almost wholly instinc- 
 - tive and can be dangerous. It should, therefore, 
 be recognised and laughed away. Such friendships 
 springing from a Christian home are of benefit to 
 all concerned, and should be approved by the 
 general Christian conscience. 
 
 One of the main pitfalls in married life is lack 
 
 31 
 
THE HOME 
 
 of mutual understanding. It is easy to feel that 
 little things do not matter and are hardly worth 
 considering. But in these little things is the germ 
 of trouble, and the beginning of the loss of the 
 essential balance. Frank and full discussion is 
 necessary all the way. And, further, there must be 
 agreement on joint action about everything. We 
 select five things for special mention. 
 
 (a) Hypocrisy is the greatest enemy to any 
 society. In the home it is fatal. This is most 
 clearly seen where the spirit has gone out of religious 
 forms; where pious practices and pious phrases 
 make religion forced or sham. Against this there 
 should and must be revolt, for it is unspiritual and 
 tries to impose by force what can only be learnt by 
 love. ‘There must be no pretence or sham whatever 
 in family relations, and least of all in their spiritual 
 aspect. 
 
 (5) Love increases the power of friendship and 
 would not countenance the giving up of pre- 
 marriage friends and interests. A right attitude 
 towards relatives also is of fundamental importance. 
 The friends and relations of the other partner must 
 be accepted and welcomed. 
 
 (c) It is not our province to discuss matters of 
 sex and sexual relations, but the dangerous results 
 of lack of mutual respect and confidence in this © 
 matter are so devastating to married life that we 
 must point out the urgent importance of mutual 
 discussion and understanding of any matters con- 
 nected with it. 
 
 (d) ‘True co-operation is impossible unless both 
 parents know the financial position of the home. 
 
 32 
 
THE FAMILY IN THE HOME 
 
 The husband earns his contribution to the home 
 in cash payment for his services elsewhere; the 
 wife gives her contribution by direct service. Both 
 are of equal value. It is the family’s money and not 
 that of any one of its members. Thorough frank- 
 ness here breeds the only family responsibility worth 
 having, and there is much to be said for a joint 
 bank or savings account. 
 
 (e) The training and education of the children 
 is from the beginning a joint undertaking. And 
 later on parents should consider the kind and place 
 of education most suited to the individual child 
 and try to keep in touch with its interests and 
 teachers. | 
 
 To keep even the smallest matters undiscussed 
 does not prevent friction. It increases it in the 
 end. It may be said that lack of sympathy in 
 tastes ought to have been thought of before marriage, 
 and that it is very difficult to remedy afterwards. 
 Unfortunately it is too often the case that powerful 
 personal attraction in one or two respects has 
 obscured a diversity, even an opposition of intel- 
 lectual and esthetic interests, and this abides when 
 the glamour of romance has passed. As most 
 people want a home of their own for self-expression, 
 it may become-very difficult to express both per- 
 sonalities in the same home. This may lead to a 
 struggle for the mastery, or to a drifting apart, so 
 that the home is only an expression of the dominant 
 self or a bit of crazy patchwork. Here again it 
 is only the genuine love that seeks the other’s good 
 that can save the situation. It will at least respect 
 the other’s tastes, and such respect is the first 
 
 D 33 
 
THE HOME 
 
 condition of a possible sharing. As with friends, it 
 will have to be recognised that there are more 
 appreciations and satisfactions in any one personality 
 than can be fully shared by any other one, and that 
 to exclude all that is not common to both is to 
 dwarf both. But the love that affords each other 
 scope for self-expression, even though it begin, like 
 Bofhin’s Bower, with part of the same room given 
 to the “ high-flier after fashion,” and the other 
 part to the homely comfort of an inn, will end by 
 making the divers tastes complementary and creat- 
 ing a home that is more than “ the sum of its parts.” 
 
 Divergent tastes and opinions are bound to show 
 themselves, and the only way to deal with them 
 is to talk them over. And when, as may happen 
 in the best of families, the jars do come, the 
 point at issue must be discovered and faced. It is 
 little use trying to make a virtue of patient endur- 
 ance alone. ‘The cause of friction should be thought 
 and prayed about, and some definite step be taken 
 to remove or minimise it. 
 
 The essentials of happy married life—truth, 
 beauty, unselfishness and frankness—are simply the 
 fruits of love, and the causes of failure are one and 
 all due to people being too self-centred. 
 
 The ideal family as we picture it would start 
 with all the romance of love. ‘This love would be 
 coupled with a realisation of mental and spiritual 
 sympathies which would be so complementary to 
 each other as to ensure that, as the years of married 
 life rolled by, love would continue to grow and 
 deepen. This will be achieved by co-operation 
 in all the relations of family life, by complete free- 
 
 34 
 
THE FAMILY IN THE HOME 
 
 dom of mental intercourse, by the tenderest con- 
 sideration, and above all by a common desire that 
 the lives of parents and children shall be ordered 
 by continued communion with our Lord. When 
 children come, the ties will be strengthened and 
 tightened and the co-operation made more real in 
 their up-bringing. By each member desiring the 
 others to express their own personalities as much 
 as he desires to express his own, all will be bound 
 together by the attempt to make “ Thou shalt love 
 the Lord thy God with all thy heart and with all 
 thy soul and thy neighbour as thyself” the funda- 
 mental rule of life. 
 
 In the true home Love Himself will be the Head 
 of the house and His Spirit will pervade and test 
 everything. Even those who but touch that home 
 and pass on will feel that it is ruled by a spirit and 
 a law that is not of the general world, and that there 
 flows from it a determination to create love and joy 
 and peace and make them possible in every home 
 and habitation in the world. 
 
 35 
 
es 6G. at id 
 - a. wt 7) 
 a og 
 
 
 
CHAPTER III 
 PARENTS AND CHILDREN 
 
im 
 
 Rated soak 
 coe 
 
 ; hy a) fees thy 
 
 
 
CHAPTER III 
 
 PARENTS AND CHILDREN 
 
 Tue Home a TRAINING-GROUND FOR THE 
 Kincpom oF Gop 
 
 Tue family home is not complete until husband 
 and wife become father and mother. The coming 
 of children has two profound effects : (1) it modifies 
 the relation of husband and wife to each other, and 
 (2) it introduces fresh persons into the home. 
 
 1. The relation of parents to each other.—We have 
 said that while romantic love is the indispensable 
 basis of home life of the best type, it may retain 
 strong elements of egoism. A well-known cynical 
 saying defines the absorption of each partner in the 
 other as “ égoisme 4 deux”’; a kind of co-operative 
 selfishness. Parenthood seems to afford the readiest 
 and most natural way of transmuting this into 
 something that makes less appeal to passion but 1s 
 of finer and more abiding worth. 
 
 There is a joint responsibility for someone else ; 
 a responsibility which from its nature calls for at 
 least a certain amount of sacrifice. A new bond 
 of interest is created, demanding a new kind of 
 co-operation. ‘There is an immediate challenge to 
 the other-regarding love to which the romance 
 should have been the natural prelude. If it is 
 
 39 
 
THE HOME 
 
 taken up, the mutual self-giving for the children 
 brings a development of personality that is the 
 richer for being not consciously sought. 
 
 To achieve this result, the co-operation must be 
 real. Children must be neither “my” children 
 nor “your” children, but “our” children. The 
 mother naturally has most to do with the children, 
 especially at the first, and her very devotedness may 
 seem to push the father aside. He on his part, 
 perhaps unconsciously, may tend to resent and 
 become jealous of this deflection of time and interest 
 which had been given to himself. On the other 
 hand, the father may be so moved by the instinct © 
 of pride in offspring and continuance of his family 
 line as to make his wife wonder whether she has 
 been wanted for any other reason. ‘These are the 
 old pitfalls of jealousy and exclusiveness in a new 
 form. A frank facing of the matter in the spirit 
 of real love at the beginning will lead to making 
 room for both fatherhood and motherhood to 
 find expression, and holds out the only hope 
 of settling satisfactorily the inevitable clashes ot 
 opinion. 
 
 Parentage, indeed, at every stage affords the 
 fullest opportunities for the sharing of confidence 
 and playing of different but complementary parts. 
 What is given and what is received are reciprocal, 
 and often the opportunity to give is itself the best 
 gift that can be conferred. Neither parent should 
 seek to “spare” the other the responsibility, pain 
 or trouble that the true father or mother would 
 be hurt to miss. Each has something that the 
 other cannot ordinarily give, and children that are 
 
 40 
 
PARENTS AND CHILDREN 
 
 jointly loved do not, in spite of an exaggerated 
 psycho-analysis, set one parent over against the 
 other. 
 
 2. The relation of parents to the children—The 
 Christian principle of the sacredness of personality 
 has already done much to deliver the child from 
 being merely the chattel or the plaything of the 
 parent. But it has yet much more to do. When 
 Jesus *‘ took a little child and set him in the midst,” 
 He set forces at work more powerful than the _ 
 replacement of one code by another. ‘The fact 
 that each child in the home is a person challenges 
 love itself to more intelligent and understanding 
 service. It is a great thing to care for physical 
 health by good feeding, clothing and similar minis- 
 trations. It is greater to give a good education. 
 But the greatest is to develop a character. ‘This is 
 generally more dependent upon the home life than 
 upon all other influences. 
 
 (a) It must be the child’s own character—The 
 home has one supreme advantage over other insti- 
 tutions. Its laws and habits spring almost wholly 
 out of its life and are not imposed by rule. ‘The 
 discipline of the home is natural, and therefore in 
 a unique way it is a place for real education for 
 prospective citizenship both of the Kingdom of 
 God and of the world. Education received at 
 home is not really given by a series of authoritative 
 parental prohibitions, but by unselfish, temperate 
 example and an appeal to the mind and heart by 
 truthful and rational explanations. It is what they 
 see rather than what they are told that has weight 
 with children, and an atmosphere of understanding, 
 
 41 
 
THE HOME 
 
 frankness and sympathy does more than any direct 
 teaching. 
 
 A standard of conduct, however excellent, that is 
 merely enforced from without is liable to fail in 
 important respects. It will be of no use to the 
 grown boys or girls when they have to stand on 
 their own feet and make their own decisions. Even 
 while they are children, if it does not in some way 
 command their own assent, it will lead to evasions 
 and a sense of resentment. ‘There is a strong case 
 for the modern psychological belief that mere 
 repression of instincts and desires leads to much 
 mischief both of a physical and a moral nature. 
 
 This applies to tastes and abilities, as well as to 
 what are more narrowly considered as morals. 
 Where these are discouraged because they do not 
 accord with those of the parents it may lead to 
 the thwarting of the child’s own personality and 
 the loss of much that he might contribute to the 
 common life. Parents will try to grow alongside 
 of their children and be their real friends. For 
 parent and child to differ is natural, but the parent 
 who is a friend will at least understand how the 
 child came to its conclusions, and not be so divorced 
 in understanding as to put differences down to 
 sheer ‘‘ wrongheadedness.” Nor is it necessary to 
 maintain a tradition of parental omniscience, which 
 is soon found out. A frank avowal of ignorance, 
 and a readiness to contribute what one does know, 
 will command much greater respect. 
 
 It is hardly necessary to say that parents should 
 treat all their children with impartiality, and make 
 it clear by action as well as word that boys and girls 
 
 42 
 
PARENTS AND CHILDREN 
 
 are of equal value, but in addition both boys and 
 girls will be expected to contribute equally to the 
 home and to their share of its service. No unfair 
 proportion should fall on either the boys or the 
 girls nor on any one of them. And towards them 
 all the parents will remember that they grow in 
 mind as well as stature, and be careful to treat 
 them according to the years they have attained, and 
 help them to reach full independence. 
 
 (b) It must be a social character—The home itself 
 is-a society, in which the child must somehow - 
 adjust his own self-expression to that of others. 
 There is here much opening for conflict, which is 
 of frequent occurrence. Children have a keen 
 sense of justice, and it is natural that this should 
 be most sensitive about what is due to themselves. 
 But in a really good home they learn to regard the 
 just claims of others and discover that in a little 
 community where this is done they find a fuller 
 expression of themselves than when each has to 
 fight for his own hand. 
 
 Amongst themselves they learn the first lessons 
 about human nature and about leadership, co- 
 operation and mutual forbearance. They learn to 
 live together with others of differing temperaments 
 and capacities, in peace and common service. ‘The 
 home makes a small world in which to learn both 
 the pleasant and the disagreeable before entering 
 the larger world. 
 
 In the main this training is gained unconsciously 
 from the tone of the home life, but there are certain 
 social matters worthy of mention which the parents 
 will watch with especial care. 
 
 43 
 
THE HOME 
 
 It is at home that the value of money and the 
 economics of spending should be taught. 
 
 The scale of living adopted by each family repre- 
 sents a rough measure of its consumption of the 
 wealth available for the community, the share of 
 the common stock which is appropriated to its 
 maintenance. It would not be unreasonable, there- 
 fore, that each family should adopt such scale of 
 living and expenditure within its available means 
 as may be necessary for the efficiency of its members 
 in their several callings, such as will secure reason- 
 able intercourse with those who are working on 
 allied lines and whose fellowship may be necessary 
 to efficiency, and will enable a sufficiently wide 
 experience of men and things to be enjoyed, accord- 
 ing to the needs of each. Expenditure in excess of 
 such a standard seems to fall into a different class, 
 much more difficult to justify, much more open to 
 the various criticisms which all needless consumption 
 of wealth tends to call forth. Incidentally it is 
 often found coupled—even in many so-called 
 Christian homes—with the grave scandal of a wicked 
 delay in paying bills, and even not paying at all. 
 A great number of the bankruptcies among trades- 
 people is due to the failure to pay bills on the part 
 of those who could well afford it. 
 
 We feel, therefore, that children should realise 
 that in the home of each Christian family any 
 expenditure which goes beyond what is required 
 for the efficiency of its function or for the develop- 
 ment of its real culture should be scrutinised with 
 care and with suspicion, and should need some 
 definite justification on grounds more worthy than 
 
 44 
 
PARENTS AND CHILDREN 
 
 those connected with social climbing or personal 
 ostentation. If this course were adopted much of 
 the scandal associated with great wealth would be 
 removed, and incidentally a fund of some magni- 
 tude would become available which in various ways 
 might help to level up the condition of many whose 
 family spending is clearly below the minimum 
 standard. 
 
 It also is not fair to allow children to grow up 
 in ignorance of great social evils like drinking and 
 gambling, or with strange half-morbid fears or un- 
 satisfied curiosity about the “evil world.” ‘They 
 must learn the facts and the reasonable Christian 
 attitude as far as the parents understand it towards 
 these as well as lesser problems of Christian conduct 
 about which there may be difference of opinion. 
 
 Lastly, there must be education in the meaning 
 of lasting love and of marriage. In the first place, 
 to the parents falls a special responsibility with 
 regard to sex. Sex facts must be taught with 
 absolute frankness at home and from an early age: 
 and it is the duty of parents to learn the best way 
 of imparting this knowledge. Another Commission 
 is dealing with what is called “sex teaching,” and 
 we would only say here that the frankness which 
 imparts what ought to be known at the proper age 
 is not inconsistent with a wise reticence—a reticence 
 that implies sacredness and in no sense shamefulness. 
 
 In the second place, means must be found for 
 wholesome and natural friendship between the sexes 
 throughout growth, and every opportunity given 
 for mixing with a wide social circle to enlarge 
 understanding and range of choice.. Over and above 
 
 45 
 
THE HOME 
 this for the children will stand the knowledge of 
 
 what love and marriage means for their parents, 
 who will unconsciously demonstrate its co-operative 
 freedom and, while urging foresight, will show that . 
 romance is part of the life of the spirit and comes 
 first, however serious economic considerations may 
 be. 
 
 (c) Lt must be a religious character.—It is the con- 
 cern of both parents to undertake the religious 
 education of their children as a natural and simple 
 part of the home life. ‘Too often it is done by 
 only one, or by both without complete agreement. 
 Here, once more, example is much more valuable » 
 than precept or rule. If the parents really draw 
 near to God regularly and with joy, the children 
 will naturally do the same. The early formation 
 of religious habits stands everybody in good stead. 
 Habit within reason is the ground of efficiency. 
 There can be no freedom until the method is 
 mastered. Yet religious observance simply as such 
 may become artificial and a real hindrance later on 
 if parents are not ever watchful that the right 
 balance is kept, so that habits, however useful, are 
 not merely habits but have reality and life behind 
 them. It is sometimes urged, with a show of 
 fairness, that all teaching of religion should be 
 left until with matured mind the grown man or 
 woman is able to make an intelligent choice. In 
 actual life this is not possible, for a child naturally 
 seeks God from the very start. Moreover, neither 
 the mind nor the heart can be kept like an unused 
 slate through all the years of childhood. Some- 
 thing gets written on it, and if no care is taken to 
 
 46 
 
PARENTS AND CHILDREN 
 
 see that what is written is true and worthy of the 
 child’s acceptance, the result will be a curious 
 mixture of beliefs, prejudices and superstitions, as 
 is too frequently the case. The child cannot help 
 forming some ideas and, what is of chief importance, 
 making his personal response in life. He will put 
 something in the supreme place and give it his 
 allegiance. He will be moved by some guiding 
 principles, will have his own standard of good and 
 evil, and will put his faith in some power. If he 
 does not trust in God, there are other gods that 
 children and men make for themselves. 
 
 The importance, therefore, of the training , 
 element in home life is difficult to exaggerate, as 
 it is in the home that character is formed. ‘The 
 moral standard, the social ideals and all the spiritual 
 values are learnt consciously or unconsciously at 
 home. Children leave the home with an attitude 
 to life which it is very difficult to change. And in 
 facing the world they have but to turn the good 
 habits of home to the service of the community, 
 to possess the highest standard and the best 
 prospect of success. If this or anything like it is 
 achieved, the home has fulfilled its function in 
 society and in the universe. It has given to its 
 founders the fullest, most useful, and most joyous 
 life, and sends out its young members into the world 
 equipped at all points to meet it in service of their 
 own day and generation. 
 
 3. Lhe relation of children to parents will be on the 
 same basis. “They have their duties and responsi- 
 bilities too, and in a home after the pattern we are 
 describing they will have been brought up to enjoy 
 
 47 
 
THE HOME 
 
 helping from the start. They will learn in the 
 fellowship of the family its own rules of conduct, 
 one to another. As they grow up it is for them to 
 settle how much time they can give to outside work 
 and still take their fair share in the work of the 
 family. ‘They will learn to distinguish the true 
 respect for parents from the false, the one that 
 springs from love and sympathy from that which is 
 based on fear or the expectation of gain. And also 
 the children as a group, whether married or single, 
 will face their responsibility for the care and comfort 
 of their parents’ old age. 
 
 Every generation seems to have deplored the 
 increasing laxity of the younger folk and a breaking 
 away from parental authority and influence, so that 
 the present age might be considered merely to 
 repeat a usual experience. ‘There are good reasons, 
 however, for believing that it is one of those special 
 times of transition which occur now and again. 
 The general spread of education, the linking up of 
 all parts of the world, and the extraordinary develop- 
 ment of the Press have brought all kinds of problems 
 within the range of boys and girls, and they feel 
 themselves more or less equipped to deal with them 
 on their own account. ‘There has also been a great 
 change of custom and public opinion, removing 
 many restrictions, particularly in connection with © 
 the choice of recreations and the conditions under 
 which these can be enjoyed. Possibly the reaction 
 may have been over-stressed in some measure, and 
 the years of war were not helpful. If anything has 
 been lost, it seems clear that it will not be regained 
 by attempting to restore the coercive methods. 
 
 48 
 
PARENTS AND CHILDREN 
 
 Children must be brought to understand what is 
 due from them to their parents and to give it as the 
 right and natural thing. 
 
 The general Christian conviction and teaching 
 might well be more definite in this matter. It is 
 more fitting that the Church should instruct the 
 children in the honour due to their parents than 
 that these should have to claim it for themselves. 
 The best parents are the most sensitive about 
 demanding as a right what they value most when 
 given spontaneously ; the others too often obscure 
 the real reasons for it by the manner of enforcement. 
 It will also have a fuller meaning for the young people 
 themselves when it is put to them as part of God’s 
 good purpose, recognised as such by the community 
 
 to which they belong. 
 

 
CHAPTER IV 
 THE FAMILY AND THE COMMUNITY 
 
‘ ie 
 vi P 
 j fed 
 / 1 
 4 ’ 
 hd . 
 ‘ 
 } ne 
 ae 
 : 
 4 
 a t 
 }! 
 i 
 Jf F 
 H 
 ‘ 
 i] 
 i 
 Tees. 
 ‘ 
 ¥ 
 ‘ 
 i) 
 roe } 
 oo < 
 yay te fe! 
 an ; 
 apap 
 mi Cac, 
 ‘Ate 4 
 tr aa? 
 rh iit " 
 wh ay, 
 F del Te 
 a. T } 
 Wavgcl 
 Peed 6 Yi t6 
 vine im 
 LE Gar 
 ee dice a 
 A aber 
 15 et 
 we “ae 2 
 r oe ) 
 inh ‘ . 
 a ts 
 ae mh 
 
 
 
CHAPTER IV 
 
 THE FAMILY AND THE COMMUNITY 
 
 WHILE in a true sense the family is the “ social 
 
 unit,” it is not self-sufficient for the fuller purposes 
 of life. It has much to contribute to, and it has 
 much to receive from, the wider life of village, town, 
 nation or the world. ‘The families taken collec-~- 
 tively are the community, and from them come 
 continually the new citizens, giving a perennial 
 freshness of vigour and possibility of advance to 
 better things. ‘This, however, is dependent upon 
 the new-comers taking up in full the rich inheritance 
 of acquired experience and knowledge and increas- 
 ing it by rightful use. ‘There are always dangers of 
 retrogression as well as hopes of progress. ‘The 
 relations of the home and the community are there- 
 fore of supreme importance. ‘The ideas, principles 
 and purposes which the children are gathering in 
 the homes to-day become the moulding forces of 
 the nation fifteen or twenty years hence. 
 
 The question of the attitude of the family to the 
 wider life and interests of the community is difficult. 
 There is the vexed question whether Clubs, Girl 
 Guides, Boy Scouts, and similar activities im- 
 poverish or enrich the family life. It seems that in 
 so far as each member brings back to the family all 
 the enrichment of his own personality, all the fun 
 
 53 
 
THE HOME 
 
 and joy and interest that he has had, they must 
 enrich it. But if the member ceases to have 
 interests in the family, and to care only for the club, 
 then family life is poorer. It is really the use and 
 not the abuse of clubs that is important. The same 
 applies to the clubs of either parent. Outside 
 interests are essential for all the family, if the family 
 life is to be the best possible. Our civilisation is 
 too complex to allow of isolated family life, and 
 where artificial isolation is attempted the com- 
 munity and the family both suffer. Marriage has 
 been called the “ death of public spirit.” There is 
 something radically wrong if this is so, for the family 
 is not an end in itself. It should be the greatest 
 support of a true community life. 
 
 Class distinctions present one of the great difh- 
 culties in the building up of a sound home life. 
 They encourage family selfishness, giving a false 
 class standard to be lived up to, and confusing 
 function with worth. Real religion in the home will 
 fight this by setting up its own true standards. 
 Personalities and persons will be valued—possessions 
 and material things will be subservient to them. 
 To the Christian the individual counts most. The 
 material environment of the home, though import- 
 ant, is not of first importance. If possessions were 
 really subordinate to persons, many of the worst 
 features of our present class distinctions would 
 disappear. 
 
 If a sense of brotherhood is essential to Chris- 
 tianity, it becomes one of the most important 
 duties of the parent to preserve in the child that 
 sense of equality which most children instinctively 
 
 54 
 
THE FAMILY AND THE COMMUNITY 
 
 possess, and which is destroyed by our artificial 
 conditions. If we wish to abolish false class dis- 
 tinction we must educate our children with our 
 neighbours’. ‘This does not mean that we must 
 send our children to any school of whose education 
 or conditions we disapprove. It means that our 
 choice must not be made on a purely class basis, 
 and if we want the best for our own children, as 
 Christians we must want it for all children. 
 
 We must also face the Domestic Service problem... 
 In a really Christian community, the people who 
 most need help, the aged and infirm and mothers 
 with young children, would have the first claim on 
 the services of the community. In our topsy- 
 turvy world, the mother with young children is 
 often driven by financial stress to work for the 
 wealthy, able-bodied and childless woman. ‘The 
 making of beautiful and clean homes should be 
 considered a service of great value to the community. 
 
 The work of the home should be regarded as an 
 honourable calling, but it will not be so as long as 
 the worst rooms and the worst food are given to those 
 who do it, and grown-up people are expected to call 
 small children “‘ Master” and ‘ Miss” without 
 receiving any such courtesy themselves from the 
 children. We have forgotten the reason for domestic 
 service. We should have it because we are not able 
 through lack of time to do all the work ourselves. 
 From that standpoint some of us have drifted into 
 a frame of mind that makes us expect personal service 
 as a due and not because we need it. We want 
 an entire change of values—a real belief in the 
 Christianity we profess. 
 
 55 
 
THE HOME 
 
 1. What the family contributes to the community.— 
 In the home, the social relations and the spiritual 
 atmosphere are, generally speaking, in marked 
 contrast from those prevailing in the outer world. 
 It is, for instance, impossible to base the relations 
 of the members of a family upon the ability of each 
 to take what he can for himself, or even upon 
 relative merit. While it is the good of each, rather 
 than the reward of merit or ability, that is assumed 
 to be the purpose of all, the common good of the 
 family is also the regulator of what each does and 
 receives. It is not asserted, of course, that this 
 co-operative harmony is found in perfection simply - 
 through the fact of family life, or that the members 
 have in all cases consciously made it their ideal. 
 But it seems undeniable that from the nature of 
 the family association it is generally assumed, and 
 selfishnesses and “ family jars ” are felt to be faults 
 and failures because they are in conflict with it. 
 So within these natural social units there is constant 
 witness to the kind of social life that is the hope of 
 what the larger social groupings may become, a 
 rebuke and challenge to the wrong standards of the 
 outer world, and a refuge from its rougher self- 
 seeking ways. 
 
 Our Lord, in bidding us pray and work for the 
 coming of the reign of God on earth, made the 
 Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man the 
 basis. If the average home, so largely moulded by 
 instinct and tradition, by its simple existence points 
 the way to a better order, there are endless pos- 
 sibilities where the will of God is consciously and 
 purposefully sought. ‘The home will be the training- 
 
 56 
 
THE FAMILY AND THE COMMUNITY 
 
 ground for the practice of service, and in this way the 
 real Co-operative Commonwealth may eventually 
 be built up, replacing our selfish acquisitive society 
 by one more in harmony with the law of love which 
 our Lord taught as the only truly practicable 
 principle of social life. 
 
 2. What the community contributes to the family.— 
 It is only in thought that we can separate the giving 
 by the home to the community and the giving by 
 the community to the home. In actual life they 
 are reciprocal. In material things the bread- 
 winners of the family have, in the vast majority of 
 cases, to give their labour in some shape to meet the 
 needs of others, in order that they may draw from 
 associated production the maintenance of their 
 homes. ‘The problems of housing and the develop- 
 ment of towns are far too difficult and complex for 
 separate families to solve for themselves. ‘These 
 material conditions and some of the social considera- 
 tions involved are the subject matter of later 
 chapters of this Report. On the spiritual side there 
 are some things to be said here. 
 
 (a) It is through the community that the family 
 shares in a larger social life. Comradeships formed 
 with members of other homes do not impoverish 
 but enrich one’s own. However strong may be the 
 attachment of parents and children, brothers and 
 sisters, it will be all the better for friendships formed 
 with other households whose ways are not quite the 
 same and whose members bring different ideas and 
 points of view from those that have become perhaps 
 oppressively familiar. The recreative and other 
 associations may well give an enrichment of 
 
 57 
 
THE HOME 
 
 personality which in turn enriches the family. 
 Especially it must be remembered that it is in the 
 wider community that those attachments are formed 
 which bring new homes into being. Whether the 
 larger social life helps or hinders that of the home 
 depends, of course, both upon its own nature and 
 the use that is made of it. The community has a 
 strong interest in seeing that its social arrangements 
 make for a clean and healthy life, in which parents 
 are not afraid to let their sons and daughters take 
 part. 
 
 (5) It is through the community at large that the 
 family enters, so far as it actually does enter, upon 
 the rich social inheritance of the past. Through 
 schools, colleges, universities, the Press in its widest 
 significance, the associations, societies and institu- 
 tions which gather up and diffuse the contributions 
 of the arts and sciences, the trades and crafts which 
 hand on from generation to generation their ap- 
 propriate traditions and technique, the community 
 puts at the disposal of its members this inheritance 
 and the additions that are being made toit. ‘This is 
 the true meaning of “ culture,” and it is this culture 
 which is needed to remedy what may only too easily 
 become the narrowness and stagnation of a merely 
 sectional tradition in the home. 
 
 (c) The better kinds of patriotism bring a stimulus 
 and a vision into home life which give it a fuller 
 meaning and purpose. ‘This is perhaps peculiarly 
 helpful to the housemother, whose especial pre- 
 occupation with household matters may readily 
 become too absorbing. Even the gossip of the 
 
 village and small town should not be too hastily 
 58 
 
THE FAMILY AND THE COMMUNITY 
 
 condemned. It is not the interest in other people’s 
 doings and fortunes that is unhealthy; only the 
 ill-nature which turns gossip into scandal. But 
 the interest in the common good which brings not 
 only the father but the mother into touch with the 
 needs of the village or the town for better housing 
 or marketing or play spaces for children, or whatever 
 it may be, does more than help towards the meeting 
 of those needs; it breaks the monotony of the 
 narrow round and makes the home itself an organic 
 part of the larger common life. The loyalty to 
 one’s own household merges into loyalty to one’s 
 town, to one’s country, to the brotherhood of man 
 itself. There are other communities besides those 
 that are described in regional terms, and each has 
 its own larger life and interest which, while seeming 
 to make demands, is really conferring gifts. All 
 things must, of course, be done in due measure. 
 But there can be no question that the home which 
 is in organic relation with the larger communities 
 receives a hundredfold what it gives. 
 
 (d) It is from the Christian community that home 
 life ought to receive its greatest help and inspiration. 
 For just as love is the essence of home life, making 
 the ideal possible and actual, so the distinctive 
 Christian teaching is that God is love. Fellowship 
 with those who accept this both as their creed and 
 ‘their working principle should do much to maintain 
 the high standard of the home ideal amid all 
 that tends to lower it in the general practice of the 
 world. 
 
 59 
 

 
 
 
 
 Ges oe 
 * . 
 
 a 
 
 4 
 f 
 
 ad | u “oy sae. ‘ ‘ - 
 RAS ear e aa | ; Peas an 
 
 Beas 
 a eed Ce Mae SO My oe’ 
 et OO Os eR OR av LLL ed FL) Ce ent 
 
CHAPTER, V 
 
 THE CHRISTIAN HOME AND THE FUTURE OF 
 THE WORLD 
 
7 
 A) 
 
 . Cees city 
 
 y ; 
 ; A pas 
 5 ba * be 
 Cs ¢ 
 +S | 
 
 ae Lp 
 ae: 
 i gt 
 
 2 YES 
 
 J 
 
 “4 i Wa 
 TR haiee 5 
 Sh Pats } Ney 
 
 
 
CHAPTER V 
 
 THE CHRISTIAN HOME AND THE FUTURE OF THE 
 WORLD 
 
 WE believe that the subject with which we have ~ 
 been dealing is of pre-eminent importance to Church 
 and State. If we claim that in Christianity there 
 is the solution of all problems of social life and 
 international relations, we must first show that it 
 is competent to solve the simpler relations existing | 
 in the home. : 
 
 Really Christian homes are most desperately 
 needed. We may not be able to do spectacular 
 public work ourselves, but we can all do most 
 needed service in making a Christian home and thus 
 influencing the world. 
 
 The home has always stood, and will continue to 
 stand, as the very heart of what is called the “‘ social 
 problem.” To maintain a home is the great motive 
 which impels most men to industry, and there would 
 be little ‘‘ industrial unrest ” if all were secure in its 
 reasonable maintenance. And, indeed, it is the 
 high business of the home to produce the men and 
 women, boys and girls, for whose life’s needs all 
 other production and service are meant. ‘The right 
 line of advance is to direct all social adjustments 
 towards making the true marriage and the happy, 
 healthy home more possible. ‘To make a world fit 
 
 63 
 
THE HOME 
 
 for children to live in would be to make it fit for 
 everyone besides. 
 
 We have laid stress on certain aspects of home 
 life that need more thought than has been given 
 to them in the past. Perhaps the chief of these 
 are two. First, the home is the supreme place of 
 education and of training. ‘The impact and the 
 meaning of this we have as Christians hardly begun 
 to realise. Secondly, a Christian home means a 
 home governed by equality in personal values— 
 between parents, between parents and children, 
 between family and servants, in relations between 
 families. ‘This is, again, a standard and a value 
 which as a Christian community we have not yet 
 faced. 
 
 Both these principles of their very quality demand 
 infinite faith on the part of parents and of children, 
 but they are laden with tremendous power. ‘They 
 need unbounded faith if the vision of them is to be 
 fulfilled. But behind them stands supreme the 
 great principle and message of love—a love which if 
 present in our homes will inevitably bring the whole 
 world into its kingdom. If we can achieve the rule 
 of love in family relations, we shall have created 
 a magnificent instrument indeed, both for changing 
 values throughout the world and for furthering the 
 Kingdom of God in all generations. 
 
 64 
 
CHAPTER VI 
 HOUSES AND HOMES 
 

 
 7 7 if %, I 
 ‘ y $ ; 
 as | ie ay f} ¢ { 
 “ Fins ‘ My > v @ 
 om # : i ] F Cali 1 f b ) 
 Ma Pare Hf he * 
 Wy i Wit ef vib? at 
 x Lage ry: ae 1 y 
 
 * ; f 
 ~~ ie ' vr va CIP gly rh 
 ; aS ee ENP AL re fy 7 
 Jr. Ute via | Vy Wid ieee ery Ph ‘ 
 MANTA lsat +s) by he fost be oh 
 Wy i A Pep A Re i a One® 
 ry DAD Tag Paik a | Luar ee oF | 
 NA et a dled oe ke 5 
 Ty wit be bility Ce ORS dyes : 
 _ yt eee | / ® O) 
 Aa PEN Van, sf oo 
 ef ‘ 4 Fh, ee bat = 
 he if 9 ave Al hal M a: i va 
 ‘, r > at ' J ete sal Ue 
 ae hue Y ape ign) a mi wy 
 ay’ ahd Ord 4 an A he Vas AN ty de 
 “at Wo 1 ae 
 r ’ i i? by F 
 A, 1" in. ‘ F * 
 : 664. 16 
 ig Pe avy WW ie | ts 
 f va se i 
 ij ¢ L- ‘A ‘ 
 i / cre. 
 ' 7 4 4 ey : , 
 b Ties plu e , 
 0h 1/ A | ras Ae: 
 ml } " 
 ire, Hy Py) 
 i i? 
 i A ; 
 ; i ) 
 , mI : ‘ 
 5 my ‘ 5 
 t 
 > F 
 : 
 j ; 
 i] 
 LU j 
 , i] 
 5 ( 
 hig! 
 { 
 ' r *. 
 
 Nagy 
 
 
 
CHAPTER VI 
 HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 Amonc the material conditions which vitally 
 affect the welfare of the family, none is more im- 
 portant than the dwelling which it occupies. Many 
 striking examples have shown that it is possible for 
 a family to rise above the most depressing material 
 surroundings and for its members in their relations 
 with each other and their dealings with their neigh- 
 bours to live an ideal life and to walk in our Lord’s 
 footsteps. On the other hand, people with ideal 
 homes and ideal surroundings may be very far from 
 Christian. But it is beyond question that the 
 difficulties of a family are increased a hundredfold 
 where the house is dilapidated, sunless and over- 
 crowded. No Christian community can rest satis- 
 fied when a large proportion of its members is forced 
 to live in such housing conditions as exist to-day. 
 
 That such conditions prevail is partly due to the 
 culpable neglect or inertia of those in authority, 
 partly to undue consideration of the interests of 
 property owners, and partly to the carelessness and 
 indifference of those whose own circumstances are 
 easy and comfortable. If the material environ- 
 ment of large numbers of families is in any degree 
 shaped by forces which are beyond the control of 
 individuals, but are within the control of an organ- 
 
 67 
 
THE HOME 
 
 ised community, the Christian Churches will fail 
 in their teaching of family ideals unless they concern 
 themselves definitely with those material conditions. 
 The right attitude of the Christian to social evils 
 is easily misstated, but the pithy saying of one of 
 those who dealt with our questionnaire comes very 
 near the truth: ‘“‘ It seems to me,” said the lady 
 in question, ‘‘ that our attitude must be that of 
 saying, ‘ As a Christian [ cannot rest until you have 
 as good a sink as I... We must, of course, avoid say- 
 ing, ‘ You cannot be as spiritual as | am unless you 
 have as good a sink.’”’? ‘To this we would add that 
 we must equally avoid saying, “I cannot be as 
 spiritual as you unless my sink is as good as yours.” 
 
 While the actual responsibility for action rests on 
 Parliament and the Local Authorities, individual 
 Christians must remember that these public bodies 
 are composed of their representatives, who must be 
 supported actively when they are pressing for the 
 right reform and must be stimulated to action when 
 they are neglecting their duty. 
 
 We, therefore, proceed to deal in some detail with 
 the housing problem as it presents itself to-day, and 
 to suggest lines of action which should be followed 
 by Christian people in order to try to remedy the 
 existing conditions. 
 
 Tue Facts 
 
 As a result of the war, housing conditions are to- 
 day considerably worse than they were before 1914. 
 It is wrong, however, to think that they have ever 
 
 been satisfactory. The late Alderman Thompson, 
 68 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 in The Housing Handbook, published in 1901, gives 
 
 abundant evidence of the existence of a house 
 famine so far as working-class houses were concerned, 
 and the Report of the Royal Commission on Housing 
 of 1880 is full of evidence of overcrowding and of 
 slum conditions. Some picture of these in the period 
 following the Industrial Revolution is presented in 
 the novels of Charles Dickens, Mrs. Gaskell and other 
 Early Victorians. Mr. Lloyd George’s famous Land 
 Enquiry Committee, which investigated conditions 
 in I912,. accumulated a mass of evidence of the 
 appalling conditions then existing both in town and 
 country. Between Io per cent. and 15 per cent. 
 of the whole population lived in the slums of our 
 towns, and a large proportion of our rural cottages 
 was so dilapidated and unhealthy as to be entirely 
 unfit for human habitation. The shortage of houses 
 in the rural districts alone then amounted to 
 120,000. What this actually meant may be indi- 
 cated by some cases quoted by the Medical Officer 
 of Health for Mid-Warwickshire in 1912, in his 
 official report. He mentions the position of seven 
 specific families, of which the following two are 
 
 typical : 
 
 Man, wife and eight children (males, 15, 6, 4, 
 and 2; females, 14, 13, 9, 7) in one bedroom 
 partitioned in two parts by sheets. 
 
 Man, wife and six children (males, 13, I1, 7, 
 5, 1; female, 3), one bedroom. 
 
 The Committee’s investigations also showed that 
 there was a shortage of houses in half the towns of 
 
 England and Wales. The effects of the resulting 
 69 
 
THE HOME 
 
 overcrowding can readily be gauged from the follow- 
 ing typical report from the Paddington and Kensing- 
 ton Tuberculosis Dispensary for 1912: 
 
 “ Badly ventilated, overcrowded bedrooms, 
 full of pre-respired air, and the fact that such 
 rooms, and even frequently the same bed, are 
 shared with a consumptive patient by other 
 members of his family, are probably responsible 
 for more tuberculosis than any other one single 
 factor. Table XVI shows that only 134 out 
 of 766 patients suffering from definite signs of 
 pulmonary tuberculosis occupied separate rooms 
 at night-time. ‘The others were sleeping in 
 rooms shared by one or more persons, and of 
 these only 179 slept in separate beds, the 
 remaining 453 actually sleeping in the same beds 
 as one or more members of the family.” 
 
 In some of the boroughs one-third of the whole 
 
 population was living more than two to a room, 
 counting not merely bedrooms but living-rooms for 
 the purpose of this average. Large numbers of 
 families lived entirely in oneroom. Medical Officers 
 of Health had reported officially to their Councils 
 the appalling conditions existing in their districts. 
 . The Royal Commission on Housing in Scotland, | 
 whose investigations started just before the war, and 
 whose Report was issued in 1917, summed up the 
 position in Scotland as follows : 
 
 “‘ Tnsanitary sites of houses and villages, in- 
 sufficient supplies of water, unsatisfactory pro- 
 vision for drainage, grossly inadequate provision 
 
 7O 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 for the removal of refuse, widespread absence of 
 decent sanitary conveniences, the persistence of 
 the unspeakably filthy privy midden in many of 
 the mining areas, badly constructed, incurably 
 damp labourers’ cottages on farms, whole town- 
 ships unfit for human occupation in the crofting 
 counties and islands, primitive and casual pro- 
 vision for many of the seasonal workers, gross 
 overcrowding and huddling of the sexes to- 
 gether in the congested industrial villages and 
 towns, occupation of one-room houses by large 
 families, groups of lightless and unventilated 
 houses in the older burghs, clotted masses of 
 slums in the great cities. ‘To these add the 
 special problems symbolised by the farmed-out 
 houses, the model lodging-houses, congested 
 back lands, and ancient closes. ‘To these, 
 again, add the cottages a hundred years old in 
 some of the rural villages, ramshackle brick 
 survivals of the mining outbursts of seventy 
 years ago in the mining fields, monotonous 
 miners’ rows flung down without a vestige of 
 town-plan or any effort to secure modern con- 
 ditions of sanitation, ill-planned houses that 
 must become slums in a few years, houses con- 
 verted without necessary sanitary appliances 
 and proper adaptation into tenements for many 
 families, thus intensifying existing evils, streets 
 of new tenements in the towns developed with 
 the minimum of regard for amenity.” } 
 
 1 Report of the Royal Commission on the Housing of the Industrial 
 Population of Scotland, Rural and Urban, chap. xxxv., p. 346, 
 par. 2232. 
 
 71 
 
THE HOME 
 
 Many Housing Acts had been passed to remedy 
 the shortage, to close unfit houses, and to secure 
 the clearance of slum areas. But little was actually 
 accomplished. Vested interests, lethargy, fear of 
 increasing rates and various other factors prevented 
 action from being taken. Comparatively few indivi- 
 duals really made serious efforts to remedy the 
 abuses. Here and there members of the Churches 
 took an active part in trying to secure reforms, but 
 as a whole the Christian Churches were apathetic. 
 Insanitary houses were allowed to remain in exist- 
 ence, and families consisting of father, mother, and 
 children of both sexes were forced to live, year in, 
 year out, in a single room. 
 
 Bad as these conditions were, the war made them 
 considerably worse. For four years practically no 
 new houses were built and little was done to repair 
 the old ones. When peace came, some enthusiasm 
 was devoted to trying to improve conditions. A 
 drastic Housing Act was passed and many of the 
 Local Authorities began to build houses. But now, 
 in 1923, the number which has been built does not 
 even meet the normal increase in population. ‘The 
 result is that to-day the shortage of houses is esti- 
 mated at nearly a million, and the slum areas and 
 slum dwellings are more numerous and in a worse 
 condition than they have been for many years. 
 
 The following are some typical examples of the 
 present shortage of houses and its results : 
 
 Birmingham.—Ex-service man living with his 
 father and mother-in-law in a two-bedroomed house. 
 Father and mother-in-law occupy one bedroom ; 
 the other contains three beds—the ex-service man, 
 
 72 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 wife and child in one; two sisters aged 29 and 
 II in another; a brother 18 years old in the 
 third. 
 
 On June roth the Corporation had on its books 
 the names of 11,600 applicants for houses. Fresh 
 applications were pouring in. On three consecutive 
 week-days there were 533 inquiries for houses as 
 against 239 on the corresponding days of last year. 
 
 Nottingham.—The Housing Committee, in report- 
 ing on a scheme for the erection of 198 houses, states 
 that there are nearly 3000 names on the waiting list 
 for houses, and that the shortage is now more acute 
 than ever. 
 
 Shefficld.—The shortage of houses at the end of the 
 war in Sheffeld was estimated at 20,000. The 
 Ministry of Health cut the Corporation’s estimate 
 down to 13,000. Since the war approximately 2300 
 working-class houses have been built. Overcrowd- 
 ing is reported to be worse to-day than ever it has 
 been. In one bedroom are sleeping husband and 
 wife, a daughter aged 26, and two sons aged 21 and 
 19. The daughter goes to bed first, then the hus- 
 band and wife, and lastly the sons, who have to climb 
 over the other beds to get to their own. In the 
 other bedroom of the same house sleep a husband 
 and wife and three children of school age. 
 
 Prudhoe, Northumberland——From the Report of 
 the County Medical Officer of Health. House con- 
 sisting of one living-room and one bedroom, occu- 
 pied by father, mother, four adult sons (ages 28, 
 24, 21, and 19), two daughters, the husband of one 
 daughter and their baby, and an adult male lodger. 
 The seven male adults sleep in three beds in the bed- 
 
 73 
 
THE HOME 
 
 room, the three female adults and the baby sleep in 
 the living-room. 
 
 Manchester—House of two bedrooms, living- 
 room and kitchen; tenant, wife and four children 
 (two males, 21 and 14; two females, 19 and 16), 
 all in one bedroom, and in the other bedroom a 
 married man, his wife and two babies. 
 
 Four-roomed house, three families, comprising 
 four adults and twelve children. 
 
 Four-roomed tenement. One tenant, a woman 
 paying Ios. a week for one room. Each other room 
 is let to a family, which pays 12s. 6d. to 145. 6d. 
 Altogether, nineteen persons live in the house, seven - 
 of whom sleep in the parlour. 
 
 Newcastle—Medical Officer of Health reported 
 May 1922, 2490 houses waiting to be condemned, 
 at least half of which should be demolished. 
 
 Doncaster.—More than 1000 houses sheltering two 
 or more families, 1100 applications in May 1922. 
 List closed. 
 
 Cases of eight, ten, twelve, and sixteen people 
 in two-bedroomed houses. In three-bedroomed 
 houses instances of fourteen and sixteen people, and 
 one case of eighteen people. A man, wife, and seven 
 children sleeping in one room. 
 
 Malden, R.D.—Three fowl-houses 12’ x 8’ x 53’ 
 high, are being used as bedrooms. 
 
 ResuLts oF Bap Housinc 
 
 The evil results of these appalling housing con- 
 ditions cannot be estimated. Some _ indication, 
 however, may be derived from a comparison of the 
 
 74 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 figures relating to infant mortality and deaths from 
 tuberculosis in those districts where houses are 
 satisfactory with the figures in districts where 
 housing is at its worst. In some good districts the 
 infant mortality has been reduced to under 30 per 
 thousand, while in many of the slum districts it has 
 often risen above 200 per thousand. In a certain 
 slum area which was cleared by the Liverpool 
 Corporation, when new and satisfactory dwellings 
 were put up the deaths from tuberculosis were 
 reduced by more than half. 
 
 This was not due to a change in the character of 
 the population, as over go per cent. of those who had 
 formerly lived in the slums inhabited the new 
 dwellings after reconstruction had taken place. 
 This shows that the community by refusing to clear 
 its slum areas, is literally allowing large numbers 
 of people to be slowly put to death. 
 
 At the annual meeting (1923) of the British 
 Medical Association, Mr. Charles P. Childe, B.A., 
 F.R.C.S., M.R.C.P.E., President of the Association, 
 said, “ ‘The breeding-ground of this disease (tuber- 
 culosis), the environment most encouraging to its 
 activities, is the sunless, airless, overcrowded, and 
 insanitary slum areas of our great cities, where 
 houses are built forty or more to the acre, and stand 
 back to back, and side to side, like any jigsaw puzzle, 
 so that fresh air and sunlight, the proved destructive 
 agents of the tubercle bacillus, can never enter. Is 
 it a sound economic proposition to equip and main- 
 tain, at the cost of millions of the taxpayers’ money, 
 sanatoria for the so-called cure of tuberculosis, 
 while we guard intact the very preserves of this 
 
 fi 
 
THE HOME 
 
 disease by the exclusion of fresh air and sunlight, 
 which cost nothing, and maintain in our midst a 
 soil which can breed more tuberculosis in a week 
 than all our sanatoria can cure ina year? ... In 
 overcrowding, confinement, want of air and sun- 
 light we have an environment conducive to the 
 development of rickets, either by the supply of 
 conditions favourable to the activities of the virus, 
 whether microbic or otherwise, or by lowering 
 natural resistance to it. Conversely, fresh air and 
 sunlight and good hygienic conditions furnish an 
 environment which is powerfully antagonistic to the 
 disease ; they may have the power of damping down 
 the activities of the virus, whatever it is, or they 
 can so alter the metabolism of the body as to provide 
 an increased resistance and immunity to it.” 
 
 The medical profession can tell of numerous 
 female patients now in mental hospitals whose 
 condition is the result of the worry due to terrible 
 housing conditions coupled with extreme poverty. 
 
 It is not possible to assess in figures the effect in 
 immorality and intemperance of conditions in which 
 whole families have to live in one or two rooms, but 
 those who have any knowledge of the actual facts 
 are only too well aware how serious these effects are. 
 Under the heading “ Sex-overcrowding in small 
 houses,” Dr. Chalmers, Medical Officer of Health 
 for the city of Glasgow, gives the following appalling 
 examples in his report for 1921 : 
 
 ““In a one-roomed house a father of 52 
 occupied the same bed with a mentally defec- 
 tive daughter of 24, who had an illegitimate 
 
 76 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 child of 10. In another, with space for five 
 adults, a father and daughter shared the same 
 bed. In another, a mother shared the same 
 bed with two sons of 19 and 20 years respectively. 
 In two-roomed houses, in one instance, a son 
 of 19 and a daughter of 21 occupied the same 
 bed; and in another a son of 19 and a daughter 
 of 25 who was pregnant.” 
 
 More than half the population of Glasgow live. 
 in one-roomed or two-roomed tenements. ‘The 
 President of the British Medical Association said at 
 the Annual Meeting of 1923: 
 
 “So long as the public house is more com- 
 fortable and more attractive than a man’s home 
 the former will claim his leisure hours. Give 
 him a comfortable and respectable home, and 
 the lure of the public-house will automatically 
 diminish. In the debate on Lady Astor’s bill, 
 a few months ago, a good deal was said about the 
 improvement of the public-house ; but nobody 
 suggested that, by devoting greater attention to 
 the home, we might go a long way to improving 
 the public-house out of existence altogether.” 
 
 The conditions in rural districts are no better. 
 The following extract from the Report of a special 
 committee set up by the Ely Diocesan Committee 
 in I9II to investigate housing conditions in a 
 typical rural area contains statements true to-day 
 of a large proportion of our country districts : 
 
 ‘Not only are the cottages too few; their 
 size is generally insufficient. On no point do 
 77 
 
THE HOME 
 
 our reports insist so earnestly as on the moral 
 and physical evils which are caused by lack of 
 proper bedrooms. Every cottage in which 
 there is a growing family ought to have three 
 bedrooms; one for the parents, one for the 
 boys, and one for the girls. Exact statistics 
 are not to be had, but it is plain that a small 
 proportion of the cottages satisfy this ele- 
 mentary requirement. What this involves is 
 well indicated by the words of one vicar, which 
 may be taken as applicable to scores of parishes : 
 ‘Very few houses have three bedrooms; 
 perhaps the largest number have one bedroom — 
 and an attic, but nearly as many have only one. 
 And whole families live in all those houses, 
 some with lodgers. Boys and girls who have 
 come to puberty sleep in the same room: 
 married couples sleep together in the presence 
 of their children: crying children disturb a 
 whole household beyond the possibility of 
 sleep: related adults must undress and relieve 
 nature in one another’s presence. ‘These evils 
 will be accentuated in times of sickness, preg- 
 nancy, childbirth, or in cases of drunkenness, 
 indecency, irreligion. ‘The thing can’t be put 
 on paper—perhaps I have put too much 
 already. But the mere heading of this section 
 gives no Clue to the vile enormity and magnitude 
 of the evil.” 
 
 The lamentable frequency of incest is directly 
 traceable to this cause. 
 The fact that many young couples after marriage 
 78 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 have to live under overcrowded conditions in the 
 home of their parents leads not merely to quarrels 
 between the younger and older generations, but 
 to the rupture of the relations between the young 
 husband and wife themselves. This has been 
 proved by the evidence in many separation cases 
 before the Justices. 
 
 Many families in well-to-do circumstances and 
 living in good homes who are to-day conspicuous 
 for their love and consideration for each other, 
 would find it difficult to preserve such ideal relations 
 if they had all to sleep, eat and spend their evenings 
 in one overcrowded room. 
 
 Moreover, it is obvious that children brought up 
 in areas containing seventy or eighty dwellings to 
 the acre—dwellings into which the sunshine can 
 hardly penetrate—children whose only playgrounds 
 are dark alleys and narrow streets, stand a poor 
 chance of becoming healthy and useful citizens. 
 
 The Lambeth Conference of Bishops? declared 
 that the supreme claims of life must never be inter- 
 fered with by considerations of property. To 
 remedy the housing conditions and to secure 
 sufficient good accommodation for everyone, and. to 
 secure better surroundings for the people’s homes, 
 may involve considerable cost to tax-payers and rate- 
 payers, and actual loss to owners of dilapidated 
 property. But while every effort should be made to 
 economise, economy must not be attained at the 
 expense of the health and happiness of a large section 
 of the population. 
 
 1 Report of Proceedings of the Lambeth Conference of Anglican 
 Bishops, 1921. 
 
 fit, 
 
THE HOME 
 The Archbishops? fifth Committee of Inquiry 
 
 summed up the position in these words: 
 
 “We are not concerned merely, or even 
 mainly, with the material benefits which would 
 follow a resolute attempt to cope with the 
 Housing Problem. Insufficient and insanitary 
 housing is the source of moral weakness and 
 spiritual degradation. It undermines the health 
 of childhood, weakens the bonds of family life 
 and impairs the comfort of old age. ‘There are 
 few more urgent duties for Christian men and 
 women than to play their part in removing this 
 great and inveterate evil from the life of the 
 community.” 
 
 Tue PRoBLEM 
 
 Broadly speaking, the problem which confronts 
 us in housing and town planning is fourfold : 
 
 (1) How to secure sufficient houses to prevent 
 overcrowding and to provide every family 
 with a separate home, that its members 
 may not have to occupy another person’s 
 house. 
 
 (2) How to secure the demolition of slum houses _ 
 which are unfit for human beings to live 
 in, and how to secure the clearance and 
 replacement of our congested slum areas. 
 
 (3) How to ensure that our towns and villages 
 shall be better planned than they have 
 
 been in the past, so that each dwelling shall 
 80 | 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 have sufficient air space and sunshine, and 
 shall be near adequate open spaces. 
 
 (4) How to secure better regional planning, 
 involving the better laying out of new 
 industrial and residential areas, and a 
 closer co-ordination of urban and rural 
 
 life. 
 
 The first two of these questions are considered in 
 the present chapter, the fourth in the next, and the 
 third partly in one and partly in the other. 
 
 In 1919 the Local Authorities estimated that the 
 number of houses which would be required if the 
 shortage was to be met and if the slums were to be 
 cleared amounted to about 800,000 in England and 
 Wales, and about 130,000 in Scotland. ‘These 
 figures are higher to-day. The main difficulty 
 in finding a solution for the problem lies in 
 the economic fact that to invest money in the 
 building of new houses for the working classes does 
 not secure what is commonly called an economic 
 return. Even before the war, the vast majority of 
 the working classes never got decent houses because 
 it did not pay anyone to build them, but with the 
 rise in the cost of building, and the higher rate of 
 interest which has prevailed since the war, this has 
 been the case in regard to houses for practically all 
 weekly wage-earners. ‘There is also the dilemma 
 that, as a rule, the larger the family the more 
 house-room it wants, but the less rent it can afford © 
 to pay—a matter to which we shall return later. 
 In any case, unless incomes are very substantially 
 
 increased, the vast majority of the people cannot 
 G: 81 
 
THE HOME 
 
 possibly afford such a rent for a new house as will 
 induce private enterprise to build. This fact was 
 recognised by Parliament both in the Housing Act 
 of 1919 (commonly called the Addison Act) and in 
 the new Housing Act of 1923 (the Chamberlain Act), 
 where provision is made for the State to subsidise 
 the building of houses. We are not concerned here 
 with the relative merits of the two policies contained 
 in these two Acts, nor with the question whether it 
 is a wise thing for the State to subsidise private 
 enterprise to build the houses, or whether they 
 should all be built by the municipalities. 
 
 There is no doubt that in the conditions prevailing 
 in Great Britain, and apparently in most other 
 civilised countries, there is always a tendency for the 
 supply of adequate housing accommodation to fall 
 short of the need, since the rents which can be 
 obtained for such accommodation tend to lag behind 
 what is necessary to maintain an adequate supply 
 on a completely economic basis. This fact alone 
 makes it quite clear that we cannot expect the 
 unaided efforts of private persons to make up the 
 exceptional housing deficiency due to the war. 
 Consequently, there is no justification for postponing 
 the task of dealing thoroughly with the whole matter. 
 
 In view of these considerations we set down hed 3 
 definitely the following propositions :— 
 
 (1) That the community should spare no effort 
 to ensure the building of the necessary 
 houses in the shortest possible time. 
 
 (2) That the houses when built must be 
 
 available on terms which will allow the 
 82 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 families of weekly wage-earners to occupy 
 them without stinting themselves in the 
 other necessaries of life.1 
 
 (3) That side by side with the building of the 
 new houses steps must be taken by the 
 public authorities to secure the clearance 
 of slums and the closing and demolition 
 of unhealthy dwellings. 
 
 (4) That it 1s the duty of individual citizens 
 to see that the above measures are carried out. 
 
 Obviously, it is difficult or impossible to pull 
 down slum houses or to clear slum areas until 
 there is sufficient alternative accommodation for the 
 displaced population. ‘Therefore, for the present, 
 at any rate, our main concentration must be on the 
 building of new houses. This must be carried out 
 as economically as may be and with the minimum 
 of loss to the taxpayer and ratepayer. Public 
 opinion must therefore enforce such regulations as 
 will prevent the making of undue profits either 
 in connection with the manufacture of building 
 materials, the sale of the necessary land, or the actual 
 building of the houses. Economy, however, should 
 not be secured at the expense of the tenants. The 
 new houses must be sufficiently large and convenient 
 to allow a normal family to live there not merely in 
 health, but in comfort and decency. Moreover, in 
 order that the rents may be such as the ordinary 
 wage-earner can pay, it will be found in practice 
 
 1 This may be achieved either by subsidising rents or by 
 increasing family incomes (by raising wages or in other ways), 
 or partly by one means and partly by the other. 
 
 83 
 
THE HOME 
 
 that a subsidy will be necessary.1 It is no use to 
 build large numbers of houses if the workers can 
 only pay for them by depriving their children of 
 adequate food and clothing. If the policy here 
 indicated involves a considerable direct cost to 
 the taxpayers or ratepayers, it must be borne in 
 mind that substantial indirect savings will result 
 from the better health of the community. We shall 
 spend less on tuberculosis sanatoria, hospitals, general 
 and mental, police services and other charges. 
 
 It is sometimes said that the amount of available 
 labour in the building trade is insufficient to erect 
 the large number of houses required within a 
 reasonable time, and attempts are sometimes made 
 to lay the blame of the present shortage on the 
 building trade operatives. It must be remembered, 
 however, that they have in the past suffered severely 
 from periods of unemployment. ‘They naturally 
 tend to resist the flooding of the building trade 
 labour market by means of dilution, when no 
 guarantee is given that building schemes will be 
 continued for a reasonable period. In 1920 the 
 Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Labour tried 
 to get the Trade Unions to allow a large number of 
 unskilled men to be brought into the trade. The 
 Unions were prepared to consider this proposal if 
 a guarantee of employment was given for a period 
 of years. ‘That guarantee was refused, and by the 
 end of 1921 large numbers of building trade opera- 
 
 1 It is sometimes suggested that subsidies would be un- 
 necessary if the State made loans at a “‘low”’ rate of interest. 
 It should be pointed out that if the State lends below the rate 
 at which it can borrow, it is really subsidising. 
 
 84 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 tives were actually out of work, as a result of the 
 closing down of the housing schemes consequent on 
 the “ Anti-waste”’ Campaign. Under such con- 
 ditions, no one can blame the action of the Unions. 
 If, however, the community determined that one 
 million new houses should be built in the next ten 
 years in addition to the normal building required 
 year by year to meet the natural increase of popula- 
 tion and to replace the wearing out of houses (this 
 amounted before the war to an average of 80,000 
 per annum), a reasonable guarantee of labour could 
 be given and necessary additional men could be 
 brought into the industry. 
 
 It must be recognised that the question of the 
 supply of labour is complicated by the fact that the 
 building of small houses only represents a proportion 
 of the general building industry; and that, when a 
 large volume of other building operations is in 
 progress, the men normally engaged on the building 
 of houses may be withdrawn, and a temporary 
 shortage may occur. On the other hand, when for 
 some reason there is a great shrinkage in the volume 
 of other building, there may be considerable un- 
 employment in the building industry even if the 
 numbers employed on the erection of houses are 
 maintained. Nevertheless, there is a great tendency 
 for men to specialise on house building, and the fact 
 that the conditions of employment in the general 
 industry are bound to react upon house building 
 does not very greatly diminish the importance of 
 maintaining the steady absorption of a sufficiently 
 large number of men in the building of small houses 
 over a prolonged period ; and it is clear that nothing 
 
 85 
 
THE HOME 
 
 would be more likely to cause labour troubles in 
 house building than to add to the general fluctuations 
 which take place in other building, additional 
 violent fluctuations in the volume of house building. 
 
 The important point to emphasise is that if the 
 erection of all these houses is necessary, the com- 
 munity should make its plans for their erection over 
 a period of years and rigidly adhere to its programme. 
 
 Tue House AND ITs SURROUNDINGS 
 
 We now pass on to consider the essential require- 
 ments of the new houses in accommodation and 
 surroundings. In our climate the primary require- 
 ments are: 
 
 (1) Shelter from rain, wind and cold. 
 
 (2) Sufficient air space in the house and around 
 it. 
 
 (3) Proper access for air and sunshine. 
 
 (4) Plentiful supply of pure water. 
 
 (5) A proper drainage system. 
 
 If shelter, space, sunlight or water is insufficient, 
 or if the drainage arrangements are unsatisfactory, 
 the health of the family is impaired, and it is 
 difficult to realise the ideals of the home. Houses, 
 therefore, must have a certain standard of con- 
 struction and size; they must be separate and 
 properly spaced in relation both to other houses 
 and buildings, and they must be provided with 
 certain equipments and conveniences. It is not 
 proposed here to go into all the technical details 
 
 of what constitutes a good house. It is of import- 
 86 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 ance, however, to state a few minimum conditions. 
 The argument often used against the provision of 
 certain items, namely, that they are not properly 
 used by the inhabitants of the house, is a false one, 
 because their proper use cannot be learned where 
 they are not supplied. ‘To take two simple instances, 
 windows should be made to open even if numbers 
 of people still persist in keeping them shut; baths 
 should be supplied even if a few individuals who 
 were brought up in houses without baths have not 
 learned to use them. 
 
 The following seem to be the minimum require- 
 ments for the home of the normal family with 
 children. ‘There must be a good large living-room, 
 which will allow all the members of the family to 
 enjoy each other’s society and realise the family 
 unit. This room should not only be well lit and 
 ventilated, but original and pleasing in appearance. 
 There should be full accommodation in a properly 
 equipped scullery for cooking and washing-up, and 
 this scullery must be carefully planned, in order to 
 save labour. There is something to be said for 
 making it possible occasionally to cook in the living- 
 room, so that the expense of having a fire and also 
 using gas in the scullery need not necessarily be 
 incurred. But it should always be possible to cook 
 in the scullery as well. 
 
 If the family is to enjoy the fullest opportunities 
 for recreation and self-development, a second 
 living-room must be provided, though this can be 
 smaller than the first. Such a living-room, or 
 parlour, may not be necessary in the case of childless 
 couples, or where there is only one small child, but 
 
 87 
 
THE HOME 
 
 where there are growing boys and girls it is practically 
 an essential. In view of the fact that there are 
 already large numbers of “ non-parlour ”’ houses, the 
 vast majority of the new houses should have parlours. 
 
 Sleeping accommodation in rooms separate from 
 those used for domestic operations and the common 
 life of the family is necessary for the whole family. 
 The number of separate rooms should be sufficient 
 to meet the needs of all the members of the house- 
 hold, and to allow for the separation of different 
 ages and sexes. At present the latter end is only 
 secured by putting a bed in the living-room. ‘The 
 result of this practice is that children are com- 
 pelled to postpone their bed time until the whole 
 family retires to rest and that they sleep in a vitiated 
 atmosphere. Generally speaking, the new houses 
 should have three bedrooms, although a limited 
 number may be provided with two bedrooms to 
 meet the case of quite small families and old people. 
 
 In addition to the foregoing requisites, @ bath- 
 room, a satisfactory hot-water system and proper 
 sanitary conveniences should be provided in every 
 house. In certain rural districts, where the only 
 supply of water is from a well, it may be legitimate 
 to put the bath in a partitioned recess off the scullery, 
 but this should be done as seldom as possible. 
 Adequate space should be provided for a peram- 
 bulator and the storage of food and of fuel. 
 
 It is important to bear in mind that the mere 
 provision of the above amount of accommodation 
 is not sufficient. ‘The greatest possible care must 
 be taken so to plan the house that the amount of 
 
 labour involved in running it is reduced to a 
 88 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 minimum, whilst it is perfectly fitted for a healthy 
 family life. Subject to these conditions, economy 
 should be studied, but considerations of economy 
 should never be allowed to interfere with the essential 
 requirements of health, comfort and conventence. 
 
 Many working-class mothers to-day complain 
 that they have no time to go out to play with their 
 children or to share in their interests, and the faulty 
 planning of their houses is to a large extent respon- 
 sible for this. Every plan should be very closely 
 scrutinised from this point of view, and we should 
 realise beforehand precisely how the various domestic 
 operations will be carried out in the house when 
 built. For instance, the mother, after she has 
 cooked the food, must bring it into the room where 
 the family will have the meal. Dirty plates and 
 dishes must be moved back again to the sink, and 
 when washed up, crockery has to be put away. 
 Careful planning can reduce the amount of walking 
 to and fro very considerably, and the relative 
 position of the scullery and the living-room should 
 be considered with this end in mind. 
 
 The possibility of simplifying the labour of the 
 housewife by communal arrangements has been, to 
 some extent, explored in recent years. Clearly it 
 is not theoretically essential to the completeness 
 of family life that she should cook and wash for her 
 own family. In practice, however, no means have 
 been devised within the reach of working-class 
 families to enable the necessary cooking and washing 
 to be done communally. Moreover, it is difficult 
 to cater for the needs of different groups. Meals 
 are required at different times, according to the 
 
 89 
 
THE HOME 
 
 nature of the work of the bread-winners and to the 
 ages of the children. Further, there is a disin- 
 clination on the part of most mothers to have the 
 meals cooked elsewhere and fetch them into their 
 homes. Probably the best way in which communal 
 arrangements can be developed is along the lines of 
 a common supply of heat and power and communal 
 washing. Such arrangements are comparatively 
 easy in blocks of flats, but it should be our aim to 
 secure the self-contained house, since all the evidence 
 so far tends to show that the great majority of 
 working-class families object to living in flats. _ 
 
 No less important than the house itself is its 
 environment. Most small houses are crowded 
 close together with inadequate back gardens and 
 open spaces. Consequently, not merely in what 
 may be strictly termed slum areas, but in most 
 working-class districts, they have insufficient light 
 and air. ‘he children have to play in the streets, 
 and opportunities of healthy recreation and garden- 
 ing are lost. In all new housing schemes, every 
 effort should be made to ensure that not more 
 than ten or twelve houses are built to the acre, 
 that every house has a good-sized back garden, and 
 that there are common open spaces for recreation. 
 These are needed, not merely for the sake of health, 
 but to foster a social and communal life. 
 
 The experience gained in carrying out various 
 housing schemes since the war has amply confirmed 
 the view that it is possible to provide the extra 
 garden space if proper systems of development are 
 adopted, in some cases at no extra cost, and in others 
 at such small extra cost as is negligible in com- 
 
 go 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 parison with the enormous advantage gained. The 
 garden not only secures ample fresh air and sunlight 
 to the dwelling, but it supplements the house 
 itself, and relieves the pressure on the rooms; 
 moreover, its cultivation is a healthy pursuit which 
 yields a substantial return, often amounting to 
 Is. or 25. a week, and thus it improves the economic 
 condition of the family. 
 
 In those countries where the effects of war, 
 revolution or famine have been most seriously felt, 
 the demand for the provision of houses with 
 gardens, in the place of the customary tenement 
 dwellings, has been extremely insistent and wide- 
 spread, and we are convinced that for the majority 
 of working-class families it 1s essential to secure a 
 house with a garden. 
 
 In addition to the provision of adequate gardens, 
 it will be necessary, as has already been indicated, 
 to secure adequate public open spaces. Some of 
 these will be in the form of small children’s play- 
 grounds, others of playing-fields and parks for 
 adults. Moreover, where the number of new houses 
 is considerable, provision should be made for indoor 
 recreational and educational pursuits. Institutions 
 and clubs should be provided so that a better com- 
 munity life may be possible than has existed in the 
 towns of the past. To build new houses is only 
 part of our task. Whole schemes must be under- 
 taken synthetically. Again, the people who make 
 a bad use of their houses and their gardens must be 
 prevented from spoiling the conditions for the rest. 
 This can be achieved, partly by securing the election 
 of a tenants’ committee, and partly by a sympathetic 
 
 oI 
 
THE HOME 
 
 management, in which not merely Local Authorities, 
 but others take their part. 
 
 Wuat INDIVIDUALS CAN DO 
 
 We conclude this chapter by summarising the 
 more important responsibilities of private individuals. 
 In the first place, in view of the fact that housing 
 obligations are imposed by law and will in future 
 have to be carried out in the main through the 
 Local Authorities, it is the urgent duty of every 
 citizen to help to secure the best representatives upon 
 those authorities and to create a public opinion that 
 will encourage and support them when they are 
 carrying out their task worthily, and stimulate them 
 to action if they are neglecting it. As for the choice 
 of representatives, this must not be deferred too late. 
 As a large proportion of the electors vote on party 
 lines, the essential time for the right choice is when 
 the different political bodies are selecting their 
 candidates. Men and women, therefore, who are 
 anxious to secure better conditions should seriously 
 consider joining one or other of the party organisa- 
 tions, that they may take their part in selecting 
 candidates when the time comes. 
 
 Once the Local Authority is elected, individuals 
 ‘can do much by making themselves acquainted 
 with the conditions in their town, by calling attention 
 to the existence of slum areas, to the defects in 
 new houses, or to the shortage of houses, and by 
 exerting continuous pressure in the direction of 
 reforms. 
 
 Those who have a certain amount of capital can 
 
 g2 
 
HOUSES AND HOMES 
 
 unite with others to carry out housing schemes 
 themselves through the formation of Public Utility 
 Societies or other bodies, or they can purchase 
 existing property which is not being well managed, 
 and initiate a better and more sympathetic manage- 
 ment. Enterprise of this kind has been carried out 
 by many bodies in the past, and could be widely 
 extended if larger numbers of people were interested. 
 
 Above all, it is only by the continuous activity of 
 men and women of good-will that the housing 
 problem will ever be seen clearly, in all its aspects, 
 and solved in a working fashion. 
 
 93 
 

 
CHAP LER Vit 
 THE PLANNING OF TOWNS 
 
i 
 
 av 
 
 
 
 ake ay My OAD 
 1D Ge Raa Nira tease A 
 Whe a Ne >) 7 
 | M Nip Ay: rf 
 / 4 P 
 ty La Aa .#) 
 
CHAPTER VII 
 THE PLANNING OF TOWNS 
 
 To see that new housing schemes are thoroughly 
 satisfactory is, however, only one part of the task 
 before us. ‘To-day we are suffering because our 
 forefathers never looked ahead in the planning of 
 towns and villages; and urban areas have developed 
 in a perfectly haphazard manner, to the detriment 
 of health, amenity and industrial efficiency. Wher- 
 ever we turn there is hopeless confusion. Industrial 
 landowners and builders have been allowed to treat 
 their sites as isolated units, without regard to the 
 requirements of the rest of the town. Especially in 
 working-class areas, the largest number of houses 
 possible has been built to the acre. There has been 
 no attempt to separate industrial from residential 
 districts, and factories and dwelling-houses have 
 been put up side by side. Natural beauties have 
 been destroyed and natural advantages neglected. 
 There has been practically no provision for future 
 needs with regard to transit and main arterial roads. 
 Houses have too often been erected in large numbers 
 quite close to railways and docks, on sites eminently 
 fitted for factories, while factories have been built 
 in areas that should have been purely residential. 
 Consequently, not merely have the residential 
 areas grown less attractive, but a large amount of 
 
 H 97 
 
THE HOME 
 
 unnecessary traffic and cartage has been created. 
 No better illustration can be found than the areas 
 around the London Docks, where thousands of 
 working-class dwellings are crowded together on 
 low-lying ground, quite unsuitable for housing 
 sites, and narrow streets are congested with heavy 
 vans and drays; the whole situation being too 
 often one of indescribable confusion and waste of 
 energy. Another example of a somewhat different 
 kind is afforded by the Rhondda Valley in South 
 Wales, where slag heaps from the collieries practically 
 surround the houses. But in every industrial town 
 there is abundant evidence of the evil results of 
 failure to plan. 
 
 It is true that here and there portions of a town 
 have been admirably planned, but mainly in well- 
 to-do neighbourhoods. Public benefactors, again, 
 have sometimes given land for parks; but there has 
 been no systematic effort to provide open spaces to 
 the extent which is necessary both for health and 
 happiness. 
 
 No doubt the changing conditions of industrial 
 progress made a certainnumber of mistakesinevitable. 
 For instance, no municipality, however wise and 
 far-seeing, could anticipate or make full allowance 
 for the altered situation arising from the intro- 
 duction of the railway, and later on, the tramway 
 and the motor omnibus. Nevertheless, much of 
 the present chaos could have been avoided. 
 
 The lack of planning in the past has cost us much, 
 both in money and health. Industrial progress has 
 been delayed. Slums have been created. As towns 
 have developed, street widenings have become 
 
 Es 98 
 
TOWN PLANNING 
 
 necessary, which could only be carried out at great 
 expense. 
 
 In the future the fullest possible use must be 
 made of the Town Planning Acts which are already 
 on the Statute Book. ‘These Acts enable the Local 
 Authorities (and, therefore, the community whom 
 the Local Authority represents) to ensure that all 
 buildings, whether industrial or residential, shall 
 proceed systematically, on land at present not built 
 upon, in accordance with a town-planning scheme. 
 The community, therefore, can control the whole 
 future development of the town and see that not 
 merely in their own housing schemes, but on land 
 owned by other people, development shall be 
 ordered, the number of houses to the acre shall be 
 limited, adequate open spaces shall be provided, 
 and the factories located in areas reserved exclusively 
 for this purpose. Examples of how these schemes 
 operate in practice may be seen on the outskirts of 
 Birmingham, where the Birmingham Corporation 
 has for some time past enforced a town-planning 
 scheme. Many Corporations up and down the 
 country are preparing to take similar measures ; 
 and individual citizens can do a great deal both 
 to stimulate their own Local Authorities, and 
 see that schemes are framed which will be for 
 the utmost advantage of the whole community 
 concerned. 
 
 It is outside the scope of this Report to deal in 
 detail with the technicalities of town planning. 
 The main points, however, for which a good town 
 plan should provide are : 
 
 (a) “ Zoning,” particularly the separation and 
 
 99 
 
THE HOME 
 
 distribution of industrial, commercial and residential 
 areas. 
 
 (b) The limitation in residential zones of the 
 number of houses which may be built to the acre. 
 
 (c) The provision of new roads and transit 
 facilities and the reservation of land for the widening 
 of such roads. 
 
 (d) The reservation of adequate open spaces. 
 
 (e) The preservation of natural beauties. 
 
 Another important matter to be considered in 
 connection with town planning is how to prevent 
 the segregation of classes which is so common in 
 most of our towns to-day. 
 
 It should be pointed out that the preparation of 
 such town-planning schemes is compulsory on all 
 urban Local Authorities with a population of over 
 20,000. 
 
 In addition we hope that in the future the exist- 
 ing built-up areas will be gradually replanned. 
 Obviously, this will be a more difficult and a longer 
 process than the planning of new areas, and at 
 present no general powers are given to Local 
 Authorities which enable them to undertake it. 
 Where, however, slum areas are cleared, they can 
 be replanned on better lines, and certain progressive 
 Local Authorities are thinking of applying to 
 Parliament for powers to prepare replanning schemes, 
 Such efforts should be encouraged, and if any real 
 improvements are to be made, Local Authorities 
 should ultimately be not only enabled but required 
 by the State to prepare schemes for the gradual 
 replanning of their towns. 
 
 100 
 
TOWN PLANNING 
 
 THe PRoBLEM OF THE LARGE Town 
 
 Those who have attempted to take part in social 
 reforms in our largest towns are continuously faced 
 with peculiar difficulties. In such towns there is 
 generally no coherence, and little community life. 
 The congestion of the population is tremendous. 
 There is small chance for a large number of those 
 living in the central parts to get open-air recreation, 
 or more than occasionally to see the open country. 
 Again, the houses themselves are often packed so 
 closely together as to constitute slum areas. If the 
 Local Authorities determine to clear these areas, 
 they are immediately faced with a dilemma. If 
 after clearance they try to rehouse the same number 
 of people upon the same space, they will make but a 
 slight improvement in the conditions and will 
 perpetuate congestion. Even if they build flats, 
 which are unsuited to the needs of a working-class 
 family, they are still unable to secure proper open 
 spaces. If, on the other hand, they replan the area 
 in such a way as to limit the number of families to 
 the acre to, say, fifteen or twenty, thus reducing the 
 inhabitants to less than one-half, where are the 
 remainder to go? In a small town there is no 
 dificulty about rehousing them on the outskirts, 
 because in any case they can get easily to and from 
 their work. In the large towns, however, the 
 position is different. ‘The people evicted from the 
 slum would perhaps have to move four or five miles 
 before they could find fresh accommodation in the 
 suburbs, and this would not only increase the 
 
 congestion of the traffic, but would lay a heavy 
 Io! 
 
THE HOME 
 
 burden upon the poorer wage-earners who had 
 lived near their work and were now remote from 
 it. It would mean not only additional expense in 
 tram or railway fares, but wasted time and wasted 
 energy. In Greater London, even now, something 
 like £30,000,000 a year is spent by workers going to 
 and from their work, and this expenditure is steadily 
 increasing. What is true of London is true in a 
 less but substantial degree of Manchester, Leeds, 
 Birmingham, Liverpool, Glasgow and other big 
 towns. 
 
 Frequently, although the population of the 
 individual town may not be exceptional, the close 
 proximity of other towns produces the same 
 problem. For instance, Manchester and Salford 
 are completely one, and other towns such as Oldham 
 and Stockport are so close as really to make the whole 
 area one vast town with an enormous population. 
 Other examples are Leeds, Morley, Bradford and 
 the other towns and urban districts in the immediate 
 neighbourhood, Birmingham, West Bromwich, 
 Dudley, Walsall and Wednesbury, etc., Newcastle, 
 Gateshead and Wallsend, and the conglomeration of 
 towns surrounding Glasgow and the Clyde. ‘The 
 only real solution of the problem such areas present 
 would be entirely to remove part of their industries 
 and part of their population to new satellite towns 
 well planned with residential and industrial districts, 
 and surrounded by permanent belts of agricultural 
 land. ‘This may sound a huge task, but it should be 
 borne in mind that there is already a tendency for 
 industries to move out from the centres of the towns. 
 
 While certain industries may have to remain, many 
 102 
 
TOWN PLANNING 
 
 more can and would move if proper facilities were 
 provided. What is required is to co-ordinate this 
 tendency of industry with the new housing schemes. 
 Some pioneer efforts have been made in this direction 
 at Letchworth and at Welwyn Garden City, but 
 more collective action is needed. ‘The public in 
 general, and the Churches in particular, must 
 impress their will upon both Parliament and the 
 Local Authorities.! ‘The success of Letchworth, 
 which is already a town of 12,000 inhabitants with 
 about forty different industries, many of which 
 moved from London, shows that the proposal is a 
 practical one. At Letchworth the workers live 
 in houses with gardens and near open spaces, and 
 all the factories are grouped in a factory area which, 
 though separate, is within easy walking distance. 
 Moreover, by reserving a permanent agricultural 
 belt, the future of the town is safeguarded and the 
 population will always be within reach of the open 
 country, and at the same time close contact can be 
 secured between urban and rural workers. If all 
 our large towns were surrounded by a ring of such 
 satellite towns, each with its agricultural belt and 
 each offering good facilities for factories and healthy 
 conditions for the workers, it would be possible in a 
 relatively short time so to reduce congestion in great 
 urban areas as to render their replanning on better 
 lines a practical measure. The Unhealthy Areas 
 Committee, over which Mr. Neville Chamberlain, 
 M.P., presided, unanimously recommended this 
 
 For a fuller discussion of the Garden City method of develop- 
 ment and its practical application see Town Theory and Practice, 
 edited by Mr. C. B Purdom. 5s. (Benn Bros.) 
 
 103 
 
THE HOME 
 
 method of dealing with the slum problem. It 
 pointed out that unless broad measures of de- 
 centralisation were adopted, no permanent and 
 satisfactory improvement could be effected.1 
 
 The proportion of population living in towns has 
 increased enormously, and the social organisation 
 has not kept pace either with this increase or with 
 the changing character of urban conditions. 
 
 The life of a great city has become extremely 
 complex, dependent on elaborate organisation for 
 supplying the necessities and comforts of life and 
 transporting both the people and goods. ‘This 
 increasing elaboration can only work smoothly if the 
 individual citizen can be relied upon to perform a 
 part in the complicated organism which calls for 
 increasing capacity and character for its proper 
 fulfilment ; and in turn this increased capacity and 
 higher standard of character will only be forth- 
 coming if the organisation of the city secures to 
 every individual citizen the necessary space and 
 opportunity for developing these qualities. It is 
 not enough that towns should offer greater and 
 greater opportunities, as they undoubtedly do, for 
 a limited number of their citizens. They must 
 provide adequate place for every citizen and adequate 
 scope and opportunity in that place to enable each | 
 citizen to play his part. 
 
 It is the duty of those who really care about the 
 nation to work not merely for immediate results, but 
 for the benefit of future generations, even of future 
 centuries. A century, after all, is a comparatively 
 
 1 Unhealthy Areas Committee, Second and Final Report. 4d. 
 
 See p. 16 for summary of conclusions and recommendations. 
 104 
 
TOWN PLANNING 
 
 brief period in history! But, be the task long or 
 short, it is incumbent on us to-day to do all we can 
 to hasten the development of attractive and well- 
 planned towns that offer to every family rich 
 opportunities of health and happiness. In such 
 towns the social and communal instincts which, in 
 our crowded cities, are stifled or run to waste will 
 find their proper outlets and build up a communal 
 life better and fairer than we have ever known. 
 
 105 
 

 
CHAPTER VIII 
 RICHES AND POVERTY IN THE HOME 
 

 
CHAPTER VIII 
 
 RICHES AND POVERTY IN THE HOME 
 
 Various difficult questions which arise when 
 we consider the problems of poverty and riches are 
 dealt with by other Commissions, and more particu- 
 larly the Commission on “ Property and Industry.” 
 We shall not here discuss all the economic questions 
 involved. It is, however, essential to examine 
 certain aspects of poverty, in so far as it affects the 
 possibility of leading an ideal family life, the 
 principles of which we have attempted to lay down 
 in the first part of our Report. 
 
 On the subject of riches our Lord had much to 
 say. A great deal of what He said, if included in 
 speeches to-day, would be regarded as “ setting 
 class against class,”’ or as the most extreme form of 
 socialist doctrine. In His advice to the rich young 
 ruler to sell all that he had and give to the poor, in 
 His saying, ‘‘ It is easier for a camel to go through 
 the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter 
 into the Kingdom of God,” and in His warnings 
 to the rich in the Sermon on the Mount, and in 
 the parable of Dives and Lazarus, He made it clear 
 that excessive riches were a stumbling-block to the 
 individual who owned them or was obsessed by the 
 
 care of them. No doubt these sayings must be 
 109 
 
THE HOME 
 
 interpreted in relation to their context and the 
 occasions upon which they were uttered, but when 
 due allowance has been made for all attendant 
 circumstances, our Lord’s teaching remains quite 
 clear. 
 
 Upon the subject of poverty we have such sayings 
 as “* Blessed are ye poor ” (Luke vi. 20), and “‘ Take 
 nothing for your journey, neither staves nor scrip, 
 neither bread, neither money, neither have two 
 coats apiece.” ‘There is also much teaching on the 
 attitude which should be adopted towards those who 
 are in poorer circumstances. ‘‘ Give, and it shall 
 be given unto you,” and the parable of the Good 
 Samaritan are but two examples. 
 
 While Christ’s views with regard to riches in the 
 main are unambiguous, there has been a good deal 
 of misunderstanding and misinterpretation of His 
 sayings on poverty. It has been argued that if the 
 poor are blessed, there is no merit in relieving 
 poverty and thereby removing the blessedness. 
 Again, the words “The poor ye have always with 
 you” have been taken by some to mean that the 
 problem of poverty is insoluble and ineradicable. 
 It is generally found, however, that those who 
 interpret the sayings on poverty literally contend 
 that the sayings on riches must not be taken literally. © 
 We propose, therefore, to consider to what extent 
 extreme riches or extreme poverty hinders the 
 development of Christian family life and the building 
 up of a Christian community, and also to discuss 
 what lines reforms might take. As already sug- 
 gested, we shall not go at length into the economic 
 
 aspects of the question, but shall concentrate upon 
 IIo 
 
RICHES AND POVERTY 
 
 the main ethical principles which should determine 
 our individual conduct and our attitude towards 
 action by the community or the State. 
 
 PoverTYy AND Famizty LIFE 
 
 ‘ Poverty,” said the late Canon Barnett in 1913, 
 “is not, as the survival of medizval teaching seems 
 to suggest, a source of blessing. Conditions have 
 changed. The want of money did not hinder St. 
 Francis and his followers from making friends with 
 the flowers and the birds, from enjoying natural 
 beauty, and from having leisure and silence; or, 
 in the society of their fellows, of learning the best 
 of what men knew. Poverty cut them off from the 
 ‘ deceitfulness of riches,’ but was not so pressing as 
 hourly to add to the ‘ cares of life. The poor in 
 pocket could then claim the blessing of the poor in 
 spirit. But poverty to-day has far different effects. 
 If it is still very hard for a rich man to see the way 
 into the Kingdom of Heaven, it is almost impossible 
 for a poor man to enjoy the fullness of life.” 
 “Growth, we are taught, depends on the capacity of 
 the individual to absorb nourishment from environ- 
 ment. The body cannot grow in health and strength 
 unless it can take in freely of the food, air and water 
 which nature provides, and the mind cannot grow 
 unless it can feed on the thoughts, deeds and dreams 
 of mankind. Man lives by food, and also by admira- 
 tion, hope and love. Poverty may thus be defined 
 as the condition when, for want of a sufficient 
 income, people are unable to draw from nature or 
 
 from their fellow-men the food which is necessary 
 III 
 
THE HOME 
 
 for their bodies and minds. The poverty of St. 
 Francis, the poverty which is voluntarily borne by 
 the enthusiastic and the cultured, is not of this 
 character, but the poverty of the great mass of 
 English working people is of this character. The 
 majority of the people of England, to put it strongly, 
 are not in receipt of an income which is sufficient 
 for them to reach man’s stature in strength and 
 wisdom.” 
 
 There is a distinction between poverty voluntarily 
 undertaken and poverty imposed by economic 
 circumstances; and also a distinction between 
 poverty and destitution. No family can have the 
 fullest life without sufficient income to secure a 
 decent home, adequate food and clothing, education 
 and leisure. Moreover, if people’s minds are not to 
 be continually worried with the cares of this world, 
 they must not merely have for their family’s needs 
 a sufficient income from week to week, but reasonable 
 security for the future. As Christians, therefore, 
 we cannot rest until we have placed every family in a 
 postition in which as the barest minimum they can 
 obtain all these necessaries. 
 
 The causes of poverty are many, but among the 
 principal ones are: 
 
 (a) Low wages (the effect of which is aggravated 
 where there is a large family) ; 
 
 (6) Unemployment or casual employment ; 
 
 (c) Sickness and ill-health ; 
 
 (d) Old age; 
 
 (¢) In a limited number of cases, intemperance 
 
 and other vices. 
 II2 
 
RICHES AND POVERTY 
 
 We propose to consider these causes briefly, and 
 to indicate the principles which should guide us in 
 trying to remove them. 
 
 Low WacEs 
 
 The investigations of Mr. Seebohm Rowntree, 
 Mr. Charles Booth, Prof. Bowley and others have 
 shown beyond all question that both before and since 
 the war a large proportion of the manual workers in 
 regular employment have received wages which are 
 inadequate to maintain a family in reasonable 
 comfort. Opinions differ as to the amount necessary 
 for this purpose, which, in money terms, must vary 
 with the cost of living, but that in many industries 
 the wages are so low as to bring the family below the 
 poverty line is beyond question to anyone who takes 
 the trouble to investigate the facts. Large numbers 
 are below the bare subsistence level, while the 
 majority of the workers have wages which are 
 inadequate to enable their families to have the 
 fullest life. Attempts have been made to remedy 
 these evils both by Trade Union action and by such 
 legislation as Trade Boards and the Corn Production 
 Act and Coal Mines Acts, and considerable improve- 
 ments have been made as a result of these methods. 
 Much, however, remains to be done, and it is 
 necessary to arouse an enlightened and vigorous 
 public opinion which will protest against the pay- 
 ment of sweated wages and which will insist that 
 adequate steps are taken to secure that a living wage 
 
 is paid in all industries. 
 I 113 
 
THE HOME 
 
 Canon Barnett, speaking in 1913 of the labourers 
 earning 205. a week, says : 
 
 ‘They have few thoughts of joy and little hope 
 of rest; .. . their lives all through the days and 
 years slope into a darkness which is not ‘ quieted 
 by hope.’ Even if wages be gos. a week, the condi- 
 tion is still one to depress those who on Sunday 
 thank God for their creation. The skilled artisan, 
 having paid rent and club money and provided 
 household necessaries, has no margin out of which 
 to provide for pleasures, for old age, or even for the 
 best medical skill. . . . England is the land of sad 
 monuments. The saddest monument is, perhaps, 
 the ‘ respectable working man’ who has been erected 
 in honour of Thrift. His brains, which might have 
 shown the world how to save men, have been spent 
 in saving pennies; his life, which might have been 
 happy and full, has been dulled and saddened by 
 taking ‘ thought for the morrow.’ ”’ 4 
 
 A problem which requires careful consideration 
 in connection with securing a wage sufficient to 
 meet the worker’s needs is the variation in the size 
 of families. A wage which may provide reasonable 
 conditions for husband, wife and one child is 
 starvation where there are four or five children. 
 There are various ways in which this problem may 
 be solved. One of the proposals is that wages 
 should be based on the needs of husband and wife, 
 and special allowances, depending on the number 
 
 1 This was written before the war. ‘The figures corresponding 
 to the 20s. and 40s. would be roughly to-day 345. and 68s. Large 
 numbers of agricultural labourers are at present receiving only 
 255. a week. 
 
 114 
 
RICHES AND POVERTY 
 
 of children, should be paid out of a common fund 
 contributed by employers as a whole. Free meals 
 at school have been given under the Education 
 (Provision of Meals) Act to necessitous children, 
 and certain other forms of assistance have been given 
 at schools, all of which tend to assist the large family. 
 So long as the primary causes of poverty remain, 
 the provision of meals and such-like relief measures 
 are not merely desirable but necessary. ‘They are, 
 however, but palliatives and in our opinion attack 
 the problem at the wrong end. The solution is 
 more likely to be found in some such manner as 
 allowance for children as is proposed in Australia, 
 and as was, in fact, adopted during the war in the 
 case of the families of soldiers. 
 
 UNEMPLOYMENT AND CasuaL EMPLOYMENT 
 
 To those who suffer from it, unemployment is an 
 even greater evil than low wages. As a cause of 
 poverty its effect varies from year to year and from 
 season to season. Even, however, in the best 
 periods of trade there is always a considerable 
 amount of unemployment. When trade is bad, 
 from Io per cent. to 20 per cent. of the employable 
 population are unable to find work. For the last 
 four years, well over a million persons have been 
 unemployed and a large number more have been 
 suffering from intermittent employment and short 
 time. In certain trades, such as riverside work, 
 employment is always of a casual nature. In others, 
 such as the building trade, there is always seasonal 
 unemployment. 
 
 115 
 
‘ THE HOME 
 
 Unemployment is not merely a cause of poverty 
 in the household, it is one of the most fruitful causes 
 of deterioration of character and morale. Where the 
 father is out of work, the family goes short of the 
 necessaries of life, and to a less degree this is the case 
 where there is unemployment among the boys and 
 girls who have left school. For some time past now 
 there has been serious unemployment not only 
 among adults but among boys and girls. 
 
 Various attempts have been made to find partial 
 solutions, for the problems which thus arise. In- 
 surance against unemployment and poor law relief 
 have done something to mitigate the extreme 
 destitution of the families of the unemployed, but 
 these measures are admittedly but palliatives. In 
 the first place, the amount allowed is in most cases 
 quite insufficient to give reasonable conditions of 
 life, and, in the second place, such help does nothing 
 to prevent the deterioration of character and 
 depression of spirits. Moreover, after a long spell 
 of unemployment, especially if it is recurrent, the 
 producing capacity of those affected is seriously 
 impaired. Again, so far as the community is 
 concerned, less wealth is produced and the general 
 average standard of life is bound to fall. In our 
 opinion there is no more pressing and urgent 
 problem to which Christian people should devote 
 themselves than the devising of some means of 
 securing for all an opportunity to work. Some 
 hold that this goal will never be achieved without a 
 complete re-organisation of our whole social and 
 economic system. Others take the view that by 
 
 carrying out various forms of public work employ- 
 116 
 
RICHES AND POVERTY 
 
 ment can be increased both directly and indirectly 
 through the increased purchasing power of those 
 engaged upon such works. A large house-building 
 programme, afforestation, improvement of canals, 
 improvement of transport facilities, whether by 
 road or rail, electrical power schemes, are some of 
 the undertakings advocated not merely by the 
 representatives of Labour but by prominent 
 industrialists such as Sir Allan Smith. 
 
 It is outside the scope of our Report to discuss in 
 detail the various methods suggested. We content 
 ourselves by expressing our conviction that it is the 
 duty of Christian people to see that all those who 
 wish to work should either have an opportunity of 
 doing so, or should be provided with such mainten- 
 ance as will safeguard them from destitution, 
 emphasising the fact that the former is the only 
 satisfactory solution of the problem. There is a 
 definite obligation on Christian people to study how 
 to solve the unemployment problem and to support 
 those measures which will in their opinion go 
 furthest towards this. 
 
 Those who have money can help also in a small 
 way by subscribing to such schemes as ‘‘ Home 
 Helps ” (see pp. 142-5), and by investing in public 
 undertakings such as Garden Cities, both of which 
 give employment. 
 
 SICKNESS AND ILL-HEALTH 
 
 It was estimated by Lieut.-Col. F. E. Fremantle, 
 M.P., in a paper which he read before the British 
 Medical Association in 1922, that the total direct 
 
 117 
 
THE HOME 
 
 material loss in England and Wales from sickness and 
 disability amounted to a minimum of {150,000,000 
 a year, a large part of which was the result of pre- 
 ventable diseases. Disease and ill-health which 
 are not preventable must be met by a wide extension 
 of sickness insurance if they are not to result in 
 extreme poverty. Where disease and ill-health are 
 preventable, however, it is the duty of the com- 
 munity to secure their prevention. ‘The spread of 
 tuberculosis, the prevalence of rickets among infants 
 and many other scourges could be suppressed by a 
 better system of public administration. A large 
 amount of ill-health is caused by bad housing, by 
 insufficient nutriment, by the pollution of the air 
 through noxious fumes, and by a number of other 
 causes all of which could be removed. As the late 
 King Edward said when Prince of Wales, speaking 
 on the subject of the Report of the Royal Com- 
 mission on Housing, ‘“‘If preventable, why not 
 prevented?”’? So far as Housing and ‘Town 
 Planning are concerned, we have elsewhere indicated 
 some necessary measures. But many other steps 
 could be taken, such as the provision of better and 
 ampler supplies of new milk, and greater assistance in 
 connection with infant welfare Above all, we must 
 steadily endeavour to remove the causes of poverty. 
 
 1 The possibilities of preventive medicine are discussed by a 
 number of experts, and readers are referred, among others, to: 
 An Outline of the Practice of Preventive Medicine (prepared for the 
 Ministry of Health), by Sir George Newman; Tuberculosis and the 
 Public Health, by H. Hyslop Thomson, M.D., 55.; Health and the 
 State, by W. A. Brend, tos. 6d., and Housing and the Public Health, 
 by John Robertson, M.D., 5s. See also Chapter X of this Report 
 on “* Mothers and Babies.” 
 
 118 
 
RICHES AND POVERTY 
 
 Oxup AcE 
 
 To those whose incomes are ample, old age, as a 
 rule, has no terrors as a cause of poverty. ‘The vast 
 majority of manual workers, however, has no means 
 of putting by for old age. Something has already 
 been done to mitigate their condition by the Old 
 Age Pensions Act, and by various voluntary measures. 
 Such provisions, however, are quite inadequate. 
 Many manual workers are worn out long before they 
 reach the age of seventy, and the amount of the 
 old-age pension itself is the barest minimum. In 
 practice, the support of aged parents often falls 
 upon their children at a time when the latter can 
 ill spare the money owing to the needs of their own 
 families. 
 
 INTEMPERANCE AND OTHER VICES 
 
 Intemperance, gambling and other vices un- 
 doubtedly lead to poverty in a certain number of 
 cases, but to a much less extent than is often assumed 
 by those who are anxious to quiet their own con- 
 sciences with regard to such evils as low wages and 
 unemployment. We must also bear in mind that 
 intemperance, for example, may be the direct 
 result of depression due to unemployment, or of 
 bad housing conditions, which make it impossible 
 for men to find peace and comfort at home, and 
 often drive them to the public-house as the only 
 way of escape. If an adequate standard of life 
 were established among the workers, if they lived 
 in healthy surroundings and possessed economic 
 
 119 
 
THE HOME 
 
 security, there is no doubt that drunkenness and 
 other vices would rapidly diminish; and legislation 
 could do much to deal with the residuum of cases. 
 We must, however, aim, not at a merely negative 
 policy, but at the building up of character by every 
 possible means. 
 
 Ricues AND Famity LIFE 
 
 If extreme poverty has a disastrous effect upon 
 large masses of people, extreme wealth, although it 
 affects only a limited number of families, has often 
 still graver consequences. In many rich households 
 there is an atmosphere of luxury and self-indulgence 
 that is fatal to the spiritual life of parents and 
 children alike. Where this is coupled with a failure 
 to appreciate the condition of others, and a reluctance 
 even to pay taxes for the necessary services or for the 
 alleviation of distress, we have a continuous fester- 
 ing sore in the community. It is unnecessary to 
 elaborate what should be obvious to anyone whose 
 eyes are open and who has taken the trouble to read 
 the Gospels. One economic fallacy, however, is 
 often used by the well-to-do as an excuse for their 
 own indulgence. They say that to spend money | 
 on luxuries is to give employment, while to cut off 
 such expenditure is simply to cause unemployment. 
 
 The real answer, of course, is that if the money 
 spent on luxuries were spent in a useful way, employ- 
 ment would still be given, but it would be bene- 
 ficent instead of harmfulin character. For example, 
 if a woman, instead of employing extra domestic 
 
 servants in her own household, employed the money 
 120 
 
RICHES AND POVERTY 
 
 on providing “home helps” for overworked, hard- 
 pressed mothers who are suffering from bad health, 
 as much or more employment would be given, but 
 the result would be very different. Again, if a rich 
 man, instead of making a costly addition to a house 
 already large, built cottages for the houseless, the 
 building trade would still be quickened, but new 
 houses, new centres of a healthy family life, would 
 spring into existence. 
 
 It should be pointed out, also, that in general the 
 expenditure of the same sum of money upon 
 necessaries employs more labour than its expenditure 
 on luxuries. Thus, {50 spent on a costly ball dress 
 employs much less labour than {50 spent on a 
 number of useful garments. Even where a large 
 house and beautiful grounds are maintained, those 
 who have the right outlook will take steps to see 
 that others are able to share in their enjoyment. 
 (For example, a well-known landowner entertains 
 in the summer a succession of summer schools of 
 working-class students.) 
 
 In conclusion, therefore, while we do not maintain 
 that it is either desirable or practicable to secure 
 complete equality so far as wealth is concerned, our 
 efforts should be directed far more strongly than 
 they ever have been in the past towards removing 
 the more glaring inequalities. On the one hand, 
 every family should have sufficient coming into the 
 home to secure adequate food, clothing, housing 
 and leisure for its members, and, on the other, the 
 wasteful expenditure upon luxuries which is still so 
 prevalent should cease. ‘The complicated economic 
 
 abuses of our day cannot be remedied by what is 
 I2I 
 
THE HOME 
 
 commonly called “charity.” ‘The loyal citizen 
 at this time (1913) has two duties—first to see that — 
 taxes are equitably imposed and carefully expended, 
 and then to pay them cheerfully. In the days when 
 our brothers’ needs were met only by charity, it was 
 said that ‘ God loveth a cheerful giver.’ Now that 
 they are more efficiently met by the State it can be 
 equally well said that ‘God loveth a cheerful 
 taxpayer.’”1 If this was true—as we believe it 
 was—before the war, it is more patently true 
 to-day. 
 
 1 'The late Canon Barnett. 
 
 122 
 
CHAPTER. IX 
 THE COMMUNITY, THE PARENT AND THE CHILD 
 
ali ay wy 
 
 
 
 Was ’ 
 ae as ay 
 
 i] » 4 
 sy s Wy. rah 7 
 
 Ring. er ie 
 { bate Whe? hh DA WN os ae 
 Vi is if ie an * aK rs PS 
 ae ee Tay i) eA A) =e: 
 ; , A ean hye An 
 ’ “+ ne 
 
 “ 
 ’ 
 a | 
 ' 
 = 
 ae | 
 : 
 , 
 ( 
 YY 
 : ' 
 j 
 sf 
 ‘ 
 ‘} 
 ; 
 TAY 
 i ae ee 
 7, Th 
 «e 
 , ( 
 | 
 2 
 | 
 
CHAPTER IX 
 THE COMMUNITY, THE PARENT AND THE CHILD 
 
 WeE have already pointed out that with the 
 growing complexity of modern life it has become 
 less and less possible for the family to be a law unto 
 itself. We have long passed the time when, from 
 an economic or social point of view, it depended on 
 its own resources. Especially since the dawn of the 
 industrial era and the growth of capitalism, children 
 have gone out to work for other employers than 
 their parents, and town life has brought them more 
 and more into direct relation with the outside 
 world. As a result, the State has been forced to 
 consider children as individuals, and has had to 
 concern itself both with their immediate welfare 
 and with their position as future citizens of the 
 country. Hence, it has become the practice in 
 Parliament to legislate directly in regard to them, 
 and for both Parliament and Local Authorities to 
 vote money for education and various other purposes 
 affecting the well-being of children. This legisla- 
 tion has helped parents to provide what they could 
 not do out of their own resources, but it has also 
 in some respects interfered with the freedom of 
 parents in their dealings with their children. 
 
 Though the main body of legislation has been 
 
 carried out during the last hundred years, it com- 
 125 
 
THE HOME 
 
 menced much earlier. ‘Thus, as early as the Poor 
 Law Act of 1601, the State regarded it as a duty 
 and claimed it as a right, in the public interests, to 
 protect children as future citizens from the results 
 of their parents’ poverty. The Act referred to 
 gave power to the Overseers of the Poor to exercise 
 guardianship over children whose parents were 
 thought “ not able to keep, maintain and apprentice 
 them until they were independent.” The Act of 
 Settlement, 1662, caused great abuses to creep into 
 this sytem of Poor Law custody, inasmuch as it 
 made it to the interest of the Overseers to apprentice 
 children in parishes other than their own, and thus 
 to escape liability. Protective social legislation 
 followed the realisation of the evils wrought by 
 the Industrial Revolution, and since that date a 
 great body of legislation has grown up, which 
 regulates the employment of children in respect of 
 wages, hours of work, health and safety, education, 
 and protection in cases where they are treated with 
 cruelty or negligence. 
 
 There is a large amount of legislation affecting 
 children on the Statute Book, but we do not propose 
 to do more than indicate the general principles 
 which it embodies, in so far as they affect family 
 life. ‘The main Act is the Children’s Act of 1908, 
 which repealed twenty-one previous Acts and parts 
 of seventeen others and codified and extended their 
 provisions. This Act penalises parents for active 
 cruelty, for negligence, or for exposing the child to 
 conditions which will cause suffering (even where 
 actual suffering has been obviated by the action of 
 
 a third person). It also provides for the punish- 
 126 
 
THE COMMUNITY 
 
 ment of the parent or legal guardian if he fails to 
 furnish food, clothing, medical advice or lodging for 
 a child, or if, being unable of his own resources to 
 furnish these necessaries, he fails to take steps to 
 procure them under the Poor Law Acts. 
 
 The number of Acts codified in the Children’s 
 Act of 1908 bears evidence to the constant attention 
 which, during the last century, has been paid to the 
 welfare of children, and to the growing conviction 
 that the State should step in to protect the child’s 
 interests when the parent is unable or unwilling to 
 do so. The then Home Secretary was conscious, 
 however, of the danger to parental responsibility 
 latent in the 1908 Bill, and when introducing it he 
 said that he desired to “strengthen and guide 
 parental authority, not to supersede it.” He thought 
 it of great importance that children should be dealt 
 with, when outside aid was necessary, not by 
 official but by voluntary workers. ‘This raises a 
 further issue—whether the State has a right to 
 commission private individuals, who may be actuated 
 by any motive from public spirit to sheer love of 
 interference, to intervene between parents and 
 children. 
 
 The operation of the Education (Provision of 
 Meals) Act, 1906, gives perhaps the clearest example 
 of State intervention in family life. Under this 
 Act the children are fed, if in the opinion of the 
 school officials and of the voluntary workers of the 
 Care Committee they come to school in such a 
 condition that they are not able to take advantage 
 of the education given. The children can be fed 
 
 and parents asked to pay for meals provided at the 
 127 
 
THE HOME 
 
 school. If the parent refuses to pay and is yet 
 deemed able to pay, he can be summoned for 
 the cost incurred. An important differentiation 
 between this and other methods of State inter- 
 vention is that the provision of school meals some- 
 times benefits only an employer who pays sweated 
 wages. [here are many cases on record of fathers 
 who receive wages below the level of subsistence, 
 and claim on that account that their children should 
 be fed at school. 
 
 Other Acts which affect children are the Factories 
 and Workshops Acts, which limit their hours of 
 work, which prevent their employment in certain 
 industries, and which in other ways limit the power 
 of free contract between parents and employers with 
 regard to the labour of children. 
 
 The Education Acts, by making education com- 
 pulsory, imposed definite obligations upon parents. 
 Whilst education is free to those who wish to avail 
 themselves of the elementary schools provided by 
 the local Education Authority, any parent who 
 does not send his children to these schools must 
 show that they are getting proper education else- 
 where. ‘The parent is not allowed to have the child 
 taught according to his own ideas, unless the Educa- 
 tion Authority can be satisfied that such teaching 
 will be adequate. ‘The Education Acts also insist 
 upon the medical inspection of children, and 
 treatment in certain cases. It has been held, for 
 example, that refusal or neglect on the part of 
 parents to provide spectacles for a child for whom 
 they have been ordered by a school doctor amounts 
 
 to legal cruelty. In practice, the duties imposed 
 128 
 
THE COMMUNITY 
 
 upon parents by the Education Acts are enforced in 
 the case of working-class families, but in general the 
 Education Authorities assume that parents in 
 better circumstances are providing proper education 
 for their children. This to some extent creates a 
 class distinction which is extremely undesirable, 
 and it would be well if those who serve on Education 
 Authorities were to exercise the same control in 
 the case of children of better-off parents as they do 
 in the case of those less fortunately situated. 
 
 In accordance with the Labour Exchange Acts, 
 information from the school concerning children 
 which may be withheld from the parents is divulged 
 or reported to the official employment agent or 
 to voluntary workers. Cases occur where parents 
 resent this procedure, and assert that their child’s 
 chance of employment is prejudiced by statements 
 on health, efficiency and intelligence. 
 
 It may be said that all the above legislation and 
 similar Acts are designed to protect children and 
 to give them a reasonable chance of becoming good 
 citizens. Certain measures, as, for example, the 
 provision of school meals, are often criticised as 
 ‘‘ sprandmotherly,” or as calculated to undermine 
 parental responsibility. In our view, however, 
 such legislation, at present, is necessary. While it 
 would be far better for all parents to be in an 
 economic position which would allow them to 
 provide entirely for their children upon an adequate 
 scale, the fact remains that to-day large masses of 
 them can do nothing of the kind. While this is the 
 case, the State and the Local Authorities must 
 continue to step in on behalf of the children, 
 
 K 129 
 
THE HOME 
 
 perhaps with more generous assistance in the future 
 than in the past. 
 
 Part of the legislation as administered in certain 
 localities, however, is criticised even more severely 
 by the parents concerned. ‘They complain that they 
 are interfered with unduly, and that the State has 
 no right to dictate to them how to bring up their 
 children. Now there can be no doubt that in actual 
 administration of the Acts much harm may be done 
 by busybodies. Some of the members of Care 
 Committees may be so tactless as to rouse feelings of 
 resentment among parents. We do not believe, 
 however, that this is generally the case; and, as a 
 matter of fact, the laissez-faire method has become 
 impossible. If, for instance, a doctor says that 
 spectacles are necessary in order to save a child’s 
 eyesight, the community cannot acquiesce in the 
 parents’ decision that they do not wish the child to 
 wear spectacles. On the whole, moreover, experi- 
 ence shows that while at first people may object to 
 any attempt at supervision of their family relations, 
 their attitude gradually changes, and they themselves 
 are educated in the process. In our view the State 
 or the community has an essential part to play as 
 “ over-parent,” but, of course, every possible effort 
 should be made to avoid friction, and to make the 
 parents feel that their authority is not being super- 
 seded. ‘Those who undertake Care Committee work 
 should be properly trained for the purpose. 
 
 On the one hand, then, it is necessary to improve 
 the economic position of parents, and thus enable 
 them to provide properly for their children; and, 
 
 on the other hand, to give better education. Many 
 130 
 
THE COMMUNITY 
 
 parents, with the best intentions, do not know how 
 to use their powers aright, and as they become 
 more enlightened, the need for State interference 
 will disappear. A great deal can be accomplished 
 by a frank recognition of the fact that adults of all 
 classes require education in their responsibilities as 
 parents. 
 
 The ideal would be for the State or Local 
 Authority, as representing the community, to be 
 ready with help and advice when sought. At 
 present, however, unfortunately, those who most 
 need help and advice are least aware of their ignor- 
 ance. While this, no doubt, may also be the case 
 among the wealthier classes, their children are more 
 or less protected, physically if not spiritually, by 
 the material conditions which habitually surround 
 them. 
 
 The whole question of the extent of public 
 assistance to education is dealt with by a separate 
 Commission and we do not propose to discuss it 
 here. 
 
* 
 
 ‘ hd, 5 if Venere 
 A ON Ota ke 
 WE MS heh pike i" ayy 
 
 
 
CHAPTER X 
 MOTHERS AND BABIES 
 

 
CHAPTER X 
 MOTHERS AND BABIES 
 
 AuttuHoucH the theme of poets and of artists, the 
 mother has received scant recognition in practice 
 for her services to the community. There is no 
 saying more trite than “the hand that rocks the 
 cradle rules the world,” but to many hard-worked 
 and over-burdened mothers it must have sounded 
 as a bitter joke. 
 
 The mother is the centre of family life. Un- 
 fortunately, under present economic conditions, her 
 ‘life is often one of constant overwork. Not only 
 does she bring the children into the world and is 
 responsible for their welfare every hour of the 
 twenty-four, but she cleans the house, does the 
 cooking and feeds and clothes the family, she mends 
 and washes the clothes and pays the rent—all 
 usually out of a very small weekly income. If food 
 is short, she goes short. When the children are 
 young she has practically no opportunity for even 
 half an hour’s rest, much less any amusement or 
 recreation. If she is ill or run down, she has no 
 assistance with her daily work. If she is nursing or 
 expecting a baby, she has still to cook, wash, clean 
 and mend. All this would be bad enough if the 
 house were well planned and well fitted, and the 
 income sufficient for the family’s needs. Where 
 
 135 
 
THE HOME 
 
 the house contains only two or three rooms in bad 
 repair, with no proper facilities for cooking or wash- 
 ing, and the income is so small that she cannot provide 
 even the children, much less herself, with sufficient 
 food, the situation is one which no civilised com- 
 munity should tolerate. In many cases not merely 
 has the mother to do all the work of the home, but, 
 owing to the unemployment or low wages of her 
 husband, she has to go out to work, and she may act 
 as breadwinner up to within a few weeks of her 
 baby’s arrival and again only a few weeks afterwards. 
 
 ‘Those who really know the conditions in industrial 
 districts are accustomed to see how often the 
 factory girl, who at eighteen was full of life and 
 spirits, is almost worn out before she is thirty when 
 a mother of three or four children. By the time 
 she is forty she is frequently suffering severely in 
 health as a result of improper care and insufficient 
 food during the periods of maternity, of constant 
 overwork and of the anxiety and worry of trying to 
 make both ends meet on an insufficient and extremely 
 precarious income. 
 
 During the last fifty years more attention has 
 been paid to the needs and the rights of the woman, 
 and since the war she has been given a political | 
 status in the country. From an economic point of 
 view, however, the mother’s position is still one of 
 entire dependence. While, especially during the 
 last few years, something has been done in the way 
 of assistance and advice at childbirth, whilst slight 
 palliatives have here and there been made through 
 the feeding of school-children, through the supply 
 of milk and occasionally by the supply of ‘‘ home 
 
 136 
 
MOTHERS AND BABIES 
 
 helps,”’ it is undoubtedly the case to-day that the 
 happiness of family life is for many thousands of 
 families largely destroyed by the continual struggle 
 against economic difficulties and depressing environ- 
 ment, and it is the woman of the household who 
 suffers most. ‘Those who wish for some picture of 
 the position of mothers and their babies cannot do 
 better than read extracts from letters from mothers 
 collected in 1914-15 by the Women’s Co-operative 
 Guild and published in 1915 in a book called 
 Maternity, with an introduction by Sir Herbert 
 Samuel, an ex-President of the Local Government 
 Board. ‘Terrible as are the conditions depicted in 
 that volume, they are not the worst, because the 
 writers were not generally among the poorest of the 
 working classes. Even so the facts revealed call for 
 the immediate attention of the community. 
 
 It is a bitter irony to talk about the ideals of 
 family life whilst the position of so many mothers 
 remains as it is. We therefore propose to deal 
 shortly with the position of married women and 
 their babies in this chapter, and try to indicate 
 some of the lines along which further reforms must 
 proceed. 
 
 With some of the causes of the present evils we 
 have already dealt in the earlier chapters of this 
 Report. Important as good housing is to the father, 
 it is ten times as important to the mother. She 
 seldom gets out for more than an hour or two in the 
 day—often not at all. In any case her burden is 
 bound to be heavy, but the amount of time and 
 labour involved in the actual management of the 
 home and the consequent bad health and worry 
 
 137 
 
THE HOME 
 
 can be greatly reduced by good planning, adequate 
 accommodation, proper arrangements for cooking 
 and washing, and a satisfactory supply of hot and 
 cold water. The mother’s primary requirement 
 then is a well-equipped, convenient house with good 
 surroundings, which include a garden, and, if 
 possible, playgrounds within easy reach. 
 
 The general problem of poverty must be referred 
 to again in this context. Until there is a regular 
 income which will enable the mother to provide 
 sufficient wholesome food and adequate clothing 
 for the family, and until there is some certainty that 
 this income will continue, she can have no peace 
 and no freedom from worry, nor can she be to her 
 children and husband all that she would wish to be. 
 
 In reading the letters from working women to 
 which reference has been made, no one can fail to 
 be struck by the appalling effects of continued worry 
 about employment and the immediate future. 
 Thus the securing of a living wage in all industries, 
 and the provision either of work or of an adequate 
 maintenance during unemployment, are essential 
 preliminaries to the improvement of the position of 
 the mother. Under no circumstances should the 
 mother of young children, still less the expectant 
 mother, be forced to go out to work in order to 
 provide for the family owing to the husband’s illness 
 or unemployment. We are not suggesting that 
 married women should not be allowed to go out to 
 work, but that they should not be forced to do so. 
 It may sometimes be desirable for a woman to con- 
 tinue to work after marriage, but the income so 
 
 derived should be additional to the husband’s earn- 
 138 
 
MOTHERS AND BABIES 
 
 ings, and should enable her to provide a substitute 
 to perform her household duties in her absence. 
 Generally speaking, of course, the mother of young 
 children would not go out to work unless there 
 were no alternative. 
 
 The case of widows with young children will 
 require separate consideration. It is essential that 
 some special provision by way of endowment or 
 otherwise should be made for them. As to the 
 precise form this should take it is unnecessary to 
 dogmatise, provided that the result is achieved. 
 
 With a satisfactory home and with the assurance 
 of a certain reasonable minimum income, many of 
 the mother’s hardships would disappear. ‘There 
 are, however, several important respects in which 
 changes and fresh developments in administration 
 are required, most of all during 
 
 (a) The period of maternity ; 
 (5) Periods of illness of the mother. 
 There is also 
 (c) The special problem of the very large family 
 
 and of the too rapid increase in its size. 
 
 MATERNITY AND INFANT WELFARE 
 
 Since the beginning of the century more attention 
 has been paid to infant welfare, with the result that 
 there has been a steady decrease in infant mortality. 
 At the end of the last century the average death- 
 rate of children under one year of age in England 
 and Wales was over 150 per thousand births. In 
 the first ten years of the present century the rate 
 
 ; 139 
 
THE HOME 
 
 was reduced to 128, in the next five years to I10, in 
 1916-20 to 90, in 1921 to 83, in 1922 to 77, and 
 in 1923 to 69.1 Infant mortality is, however, 
 still far higher than it should be. While the 
 average has come down to 69, there are some 
 congested districts in certain boroughs where it is 
 still over 150 per thousand. But the improve- 
 ment is marked and is mainly due to the greater 
 attention paid by the State and Local Authorities 
 to the importance of preserving infant life. ‘The 
 high figure which still persists in many crowded 
 districts is to a large extent the consequence of bad 
 housing and bad environment and can only be 
 remedied by drastic housing reform. 
 
 Until recently, efforts to assist the poorer mothers 
 and their babies largely depended upon voluntary 
 enterprise. It was only in certain localities, and 
 then on a very restricted scale, that any public or 
 municipal action was taken either by way of advice 
 or assistance. ‘The inquiries of the Women’s Co- 
 operative Guild show clearly that the vast majority 
 of mothers and babies of the previous generation 
 suffered nearly as severely from lack of proper 
 instruction as they did from economic evils. We 
 can only indicate quite briefly some of the measures 
 more recently adopted by the State and the Local 
 Authorities to secure better medical attention and 
 better advice, and to render direct assistance both 
 to mothers and babies : 
 
 (1) The National Insurance Act, by making pro- 
 
 vision for maternity benefit (originally 305., now 
 
 1 Annual Report of the Ministry of Health, 1922-23, Cmd. 1944, 
 
 p. II. 
 140 
 
MOTHERS AND BABIES 
 
 425.) helped to secure proper medical attention and 
 nursing. Even now it is doubtful whether the sum 
 is nearly adequate to meet the need. 
 
 (2) The certification of midwives and _ their 
 proper training has undoubtedly improved the 
 general standard of efficiency with regard to child- 
 birth. 
 
 (3) The provision by the Local Authority, or by 
 voluntary organisations assisted by grants from the 
 Local Authority, of maternity and infant welfare 
 centres to which expectant mothers and mothers 
 with babies can come for advice and consultation 
 has done much to relieve the mother from anxiety 
 and secure both her welfare and that of the child. 
 
 (4) The employment by the Local Authority of 
 health visitors who are properly trained and who 
 have had experience in a hospital and qualified as 
 midwives and sanitary inspectors has also proved of 
 great value, especially where, as is usually the case, 
 the health visitor works in close co-operation with 
 the infant welfare committee. 
 
 (5) Maternity homes or hospitals have been pro- 
 vided by some of the Local Authorities, and so long 
 as housing conditions remain as they are and there 
 is a lack of facilities and assistance in the home, 
 there will be a great demand for the increase in 
 the number. of these institutions, a need which 
 is emphasised by the Ministry of Health in its 
 Annual Report. A large proportion of mothers, 
 however, would naturally prefer to remain at home, 
 especially where they have other children to be 
 looked after, and it cannot be regarded as an ideal 
 state of things that they should have to leave home 
 
 141 
 
. THE HOME 
 
 because the home is overcrowded or unfit. Muni- 
 cipal baby hospitals for treating babies and quite 
 small children have been started in certain districts 
 and render great assistance to the overworked 
 mother. 
 
 (6) Milk at less than cost price to expectant and 
 nursing mothers is provided by certain Local 
 Authorities. Unfortunately, however, there has 
 recently been a cutting down of public expenditure 
 in this respect, and whereas £359,000 was spent 
 upon this in the year 1920-21, the amount of 
 expenditure in 1922-23 was only £226,000, which, 
 even allowing for the fall in the cost of milk, shows 
 a considerable reduction. 
 
 (7) A new form of assistance, and one which could 
 well be extended considerably, is the provision of 
 “home helps.”? Certain Local Authorities now 
 employ women to do the house-work in poor homes 
 where a baby has arrived. Only £7,000, however, 
 was spent in the whole country in 1922-23 on this 
 form of assistance. 
 
 The maternity and child welfare grant for all the 
 above purposes and for other purposes connected 
 with maternity and child welfare which was dis- 
 tributed by the Ministry of Health in 1922-23 
 amounted to £785,000. The Local Authorities 
 expended a similar sum out of the rates. About 
 one-third of this was spent upon health visitors, 
 about one-fifth on maternity homes and hospitals, 
 and another one-fifth on milk and food, one-tenth 
 on infant welfare centres, 3 per cent. on day nurseries 
 and 3 per cent. on midwifery, and about 7 per cent. 
 
 142 
 
MOTHERS AND BABIES 
 
 on medical officers of health and assistant medical 
 officers for maternity and child welfare work. 
 Although the sum is substantial and shows an 
 important increase on what used to be devoted to 
 this purpose before the war, it is not nearly sufficient 
 to meet the needs of the situation. The number 
 of certificated midwives is still too small. The 
 Ministry of Health itself states that “nearly 300 
 additional whole-time health visitors are still required 
 to bring the number up to the Department’s 
 moderate standard of one whole-time officer to 
 every 400 births.” Both the number of infant 
 welfare centres and their size are inadequate. Far 
 greater attention, and a larger sum of money, should 
 be devoted to the supply of pure milk. 
 
 Looking at the matter simply from the economic 
 point of view, the State and the Local Authorities 
 would do well to spend more money and devote 
 more attention to this important branch of “ pre- 
 ventive medicine.” We have got past the experi- 
 mental stage and have concrete experience to guide 
 us, and it is generally admitted that the work already 
 done has reduced infant mortality and improved 
 the health of both mothers and children. Our 
 scale of national expenditure is surely wrong when 
 the total money devoted to maternity and infant 
 welfare work in all its phases is less than 15. per head 
 of the population. 
 
 To most social reformers the work of infant 
 welfare centres and health visitors is well known, 
 but little attention has been paid to the possibility 
 of extending the scheme of “home helps.” Quite 
 apart from the medical and nursing attendance 
 
 143 
 
THE HOME 
 
 necessary with maternity cases, the vast majority 
 of workers’ homes suffer from the lack of anyone to 
 manage the house and do the cooking and washing 
 while the mother is lying in. The result is that she 
 herself goes on carrying out her household duties 
 right up to the last moment and often gets up again 
 within a few days of the child’s birth, a practice 
 which leads to serious permanent damage both to 
 mother and child. Sometimes a neighbour or 
 grandparent gives assistance, but there are many 
 homes where such assistance is not possible or can 
 only be provided for an hour or two in the day. In 
 the letters from mothers to which we have referred, 
 numbers of instances are given by women from their 
 own experience, in which they were at the wash- 
 tub within a few hours of the baby’s arrival and had 
 to get up five or six days afterwards. The scheme 
 of “‘ home helps,” originally started in Whitechapel, 
 and now adopted in a very limited degree by some 
 other Local Authorities, provides for the employ- 
 ment of women to go and do house-work and look 
 after the children for a certain number of hours a 
 day in homes where there is a maternity case. They 
 are at present usually employed by a voluntary 
 agency which gets a grant from the Local Authority, 
 the Local Authority in turn getting 50 per cent. of 
 the expenditure from the Ministry of Health. As 
 has been indicated, however, the movement is quite 
 in its infancy, only {7,000 having been expended in 
 this way in the whole country during the year. 
 Even in areas where the scheme is in operation, its 
 scope is comparatively small. For instance, in the 
 borough of St. Pancras, with a population of over 
 144 
 
MOTHERS AND BABIES 
 
 200,000, there are only three or four “ home helps ”” 
 employed. Much more could be done in this 
 respect, and in some cases small payments could be 
 received. ‘The scheme has the additional advantage 
 of providing useful employment at a time when 
 unemployment is rife. 
 
 ILLNEss OF THE MOTHER 
 
 The scheme of “ home helps”? to which we have 
 referred would also be of great value when the 
 mother is ill. Often the doctor orders rest or even 
 a visit to a convalescent home. In a poor district, 
 however, he knows that this advice, though 
 practically essential, cannot be taken. At present 
 the community through the Local Authority only 
 makes grants for “‘ home helps ” in maternity cases. 
 We believe that the scheme could be extended to 
 cover cases of mothers’ illness, and possibly it could 
 be coupled with an amplification of the measures for 
 insurance against illness which at present only 
 apply to employed persons. 
 
 LarceE FAmItigs 
 
 The special problems which arise in connection 
 with large families need the earnest thought of 
 Christian people. ‘The consideration of them, how- 
 ever, inevitably brings us on to ground outside our 
 province which is covered by the Sex Commission. 
 We desire, however, briefly to lay stress on certain 
 aspects of the question. 
 
 L 145 
 
f THE HOME 
 
 We deprecate minute calculations about the num- 
 ber of children required in a family, but it is essential 
 that the mother should take her due share in any 
 decision that is reached, and her wishes and desires 
 must be respected. Both parents also must remem- 
 ber the value of moderate-sized families to the 
 children themselves if the home is to be the training- 
 ground we have described. It is not really in the 
 interests of the children to limit their number— 
 with a view to increasing their material advantages 
 —if the gain of mutual co-operation and education 
 is lost. 
 
 The community must realise that the whole 
 problem is intensified by wrong economic conditions, 
 of which bad housing is the chief. It imposes 
 restrictions which would otherwise not be tolerated, 
 and the lack of space tends to prevent restraint in 
 sexual relations. Acommunity can hardly be called 
 Christian which allows children to be brought into 
 the world in circumstances where they cannot have 
 a reasonable chance of growing up in healthy con- 
 ditions. The larger the family the more do material 
 conditions affect it, and this can only be mitigated— 
 apart from some form of family endowment and by a 
 better knowledge of the internal management and 
 economy of the home—by both parents together 
 giving thought to the responsibility of parenthood, 
 and to the damage wrought to the health of the 
 mother by too rapid child-bearing. 
 
 In some walks of life there will have to be as well 
 an alteration in our standard of values. The new 
 standard would contain what is essential for spiritual 
 and physical well-being, and would eliminate much 
 
 146 
 
MOTHERS AND BABIES 
 
 that we consider necessary in the way of amusements 
 and luxury. Weshould cease to prefer three servants 
 and two children to two servants and three children. 
 We should cease to worry if our children were less 
 finely dressed than our neighbour’s. We should 
 not have any ambition to change our “ class,” but 
 only our culture and capabilities; and we should 
 give up imagining that for real education we must 
 send our children to the most expensive schools. 
 
 L2 147 
 
ee 
 
 J * << 
 ' < nee waste 
 
 ‘x, # 
 Loi. 
 
 
 
 * Lae ® 7 
 a Dh ae 6d 
 
- 
 
 CHAPTER XI 
 CONCLUSIONS 
 
 
 

 
CHAPTER XI 
 CONCLUSIONS 
 
 WE are aware that, within the compass of our 
 Report, we have not been able to deal exhaustively 
 with the intricate social and economic problems 
 which are connected with the home and family life 
 as institutions in our order of society. We have 
 tried, however, to present the main principles in- 
 volved and to discuss their application to the prac- 
 tical matters of every-day life. 
 
 Our conclusions, however, if accepted, will only 
 be of value in so far as they lead to action by Christian 
 people, both as individuals and as members of cor- 
 porate Churches. 
 
 The Christian Churches have always claimed to be 
 vitally concerned with home and family life. Be- 
 cause they are responsible for the family’s spiritual 
 life, they are responsible also for the material con- 
 ditions which minister to this. If the Church is 
 concerned with baptisms, it is also concerned with 
 infant welfare; if it claims authority with respect 
 to marriage and its inviolability, it must concern 
 itself with home-making, and therefore with housing ; 
 if it performs the last rites over the dead, it must 
 concern itself with the welfare of the survivors. 
 
 In this concluding chapter we summarise some of 
 151 
 
THE HOME 
 
 the chief points in our argument, and the main con- 
 clusions at which we have arrived. 
 
 1. The family and the home are institutions 
 common to all countries and races with any 
 degree of civilisation. 
 
 2. The family is the simplest social unit and 
 is also the most rich in potential Christianity. 
 
 3. The phrases used to indicate love both in 
 the teaching of our Lord and in common speech 
 about human institutions which set before them — 
 co-operation and service as ideals, are culled 
 from those used in regard to family relations. 
 
 4. The family has evolved from lower to 
 higher types and—despite many set-backs and 
 failures—has especially evolved under the influ- 
 ence of Christianity during the Christian era. 
 
 5. The establishment of a Christian Com- 
 monwealth—and in fact the Kingdom of God 
 on earth—will best be founded on the family 
 and home as the unit. 
 
 6. Our Lord, although He indicated that the 
 family was the ideal social unit, and family 
 relations those which most clearly revealed the 
 spirit of love, made it clear that the family must 
 not be regarded as an end in itself. He showed 
 that occasions would arise when the home and 
 the family might and would have to be broken 
 up “‘ for His sake.” 
 
 7. Nevertheless, the family-home is the ideal 
 training-ground for Christian life. The home 
 is the place where the lessons of service and co- 
 
 operation can first and best be learned. 
 152 
 
CONCLUSIONS 
 
 8. The basis of the home and the family must 
 be the same as the basis of Christianity itself, 
 that is to say, love. 
 
 g. Failures in family life, and particularly in 
 married life, are due to the enemies of love, which 
 may be summed up as selfishness. ‘They may 
 also be due to a misunderstanding of what love 
 really means. Both romantic love and the love 
 of one’s household may and often do remain 
 largely egoistic. Love is a way of living. Of 
 its nature it must grow and deepen, and the 
 effort foreseen in married life must be con- 
 tinually kept up. 
 
 10. The home that concentrates solely on the 
 welfare of its own children to the exclusion of 
 other children is failing to see the relation of 
 home life to the community. Neither the 
 family nor the members of it should become so 
 absorbed in itself that it neglects to cultivate 
 outside interests, and the service of others and 
 of the community. 
 
 11. Education of children by parents is not 
 best achieved by a series of parental prohibi- 
 tions, but by example, and appeal to the mind 
 and heart by truthful and rational explanations. 
 
 12. Parents should not try to bring up their 
 children in their own image. ‘There must be a 
 development of the children’s own character. 
 The parents must remember that the character 
 they are trying to develop must be a social 
 character. The home itself is a society in which 
 the child must somehow adjust his own self- 
 expression to that of others. There must be 
 
 153 
 
THE HOME 
 
 education in the meaning of the lasting love of 
 marriage. | 
 
 13. Itis the concern of both parents to under- 
 take the religious education of their children 
 as a natural and simple part of home life. 
 
 14. Class distinctions encourage family self- 
 ishness, giving a false standard and confusing 
 function with worth. If we wish to abolish 
 false class distinctions we shall educate our 
 children with our neighbours’; and if we want 
 the best for our own children, as Christians we 
 must want it for all. 
 
 15. From the nature of the family association 
 it is generally assumed that selfishness and family 
 jars are faults and failures, because they conflict 
 with the co-operative harmony which is found 
 to be essential to happy family life. The 
 achievement of such harmony should lead to the 
 general social groupings being dominated by the 
 same spirit. 
 
 16. ‘The community can contribute much to 
 family life. Comradeships formed with mem- 
 bers of other families do not impoverish but 
 enrich one’s own. It is through the com- 
 munity at large that the family enters—as far 
 as it does enter—upon the social inheritance 
 
 of the past. 
 
 Under the foregoing heads we have summarised, 
 
 what we have stated at greater length in Chapters I 
 to V, some of the main considerations in connection 
 with the building up of the family life which we 
 believe to be in accordance with the Christian ideal, 
 
 154 
 
CONCLUSIONS 
 
 and also the relation between the family and the 
 community. While family life of a high character 
 can be achieved despite material surroundings and 
 conditions, it is undeniable that the conditions which 
 at present exist in our country are great obstacles 
 to the achievement of the ideals at which we aim. 
 Extreme poverty on the one hand and extreme 
 luxury on the other, bad housing and dismal sur- 
 roundings, are all obstacles in the way of living the 
 Christian family life, which may be overcome but 
 which should be removed. If the Christian Com- 
 monwealth is to be achieved, there is a definite 
 obligation upon individuals and the community at 
 large to secure better social and economic conditions. 
 Such improvement will not in itself secure the 
 achievement of the Christian ideal, but it will make 
 such achievements more possible. ‘The following are 
 the main conclusions at which we have arrived in 
 Chapters VI to X as to reforms in our social and 
 economic system which should be worked and 
 prayed for, and which demand both individual and 
 political action by Christian people. They are: 
 
 1. Every family should have the opportunity 
 of occupying a home with accommodation 
 adequate for the family’s needs and comfort, so 
 designed and with such surroundings as will 
 secure health and amenity. At present there is 
 a shortage of houses amounting to at least a 
 million, and a large proportion of the houses 
 which exist are unsatisfactory in themselves, or 
 are overcrowded and have depressing and 
 unhealthy surroundings. 
 
 155 
 
THE HOME 
 
 2. The present housing situation has, among 
 others, the following evil results : 
 
 (a) Bad health. 
 
 (b) Excessive mortality. 
 
 (c) In many cases, immorality and other 
 vices. 
 
 (d) Lack of opportunity for culture and 
 
 education. 
 
 3. It is the duty of the community, and of the 
 individuals that compose it, to secure the build- 
 ing at the earliest possible date of houses in 
 sufficient numbers, properly planned, and with 
 sufficient space surrounding them, to meet the 
 housing needs of the time. We believe that if 
 these houses are not provided in other ways, the 
 public authorities should provide them, even 
 though such a course involves a burden upon 
 the tax-payer or rate-payer. In our opinion, 
 however, such apparent cost would be more than 
 balanced by the savings due to improvement in 
 health and other conditions. 
 
 4. The fullest possible use should be made of 
 the Town Planning Acts, and of such further 
 legislation as may be found necessary to secure 
 the better planning of towns. Such plans 
 should provide for the separation of industrial, 
 commercial and residential areas, the limitation 
 of the number of houses that may be built to 
 the acre, the provision of adequate transit 
 facilities, the reservation of open spaces and the 
 provision of recreation grounds. 
 
 5. In order to deal with the problem of the 
 156 
 
CONCLUSIONS 
 
 large towns, and to relieve their congestion, it 
 will be necessary to start new satellite cities 
 to which both industry and population can be 
 moved, in accordance with the principles already 
 put into practice at Letchworth and Welwyn. 
 
 6. Extreme poverty, involving continual 
 anxiety from day to day about the means of life, 
 is suffered by a large proportion of British 
 families. ‘This is due to various causes, and in 
 particular to low wages, unemployment or 
 casual employment, sickness or ill-health, old 
 age, and, in a limited number of cases, intemper- 
 ance and other vices. 
 
 7. As Christians we cannot rest until we have 
 placed every family in a position in which, as 
 the barest minimum, it can obtain all the 
 necessaries of life with reasonable security of 
 continuance. 
 
 8. Public opinion should be roused to pro- 
 test against the payment of sweated wages, 
 and to insist that a living wage is paid in all 
 industries, that adequate measures are taken to 
 deal with the problem of unemployment, that 
 the Insurance Acts are extended to secure 
 families against the evil results of bad health, 
 and that Old Age Pensions are adequate. 
 
 g. In general the main responsibility for the 
 welfare of the children rests upon parents, but 
 the community must concern itself with their 
 welfare, not merely by ensuring that the family 
 shall have sufficient income to provide the 
 necessaries of life, but also adequate education, 
 and, where necessary, it must protect the 
 
 157 
 
THE HOME 
 
 children against the neglect even of their own 
 parents. Meddlesome interference, however, 
 should be avoided, and the administration of 
 legislation for the protection of children should 
 be in the hands of those who are properly 
 qualified for the work. 
 
 10. We recognise the value of what has been 
 done in recent years to improve conditions for 
 mothers and babies, but are convinced that the 
 community should press for far greater assist- 
 ance than is at present provided. Maternity and 
 infant welfare work should be extended on a far 
 greater scale than is at present the case. The 
 greater expenditure so involved will be the best 
 form of economy. 
 
 We therefore submit the following resolutions : 
 
 1. That the building up of Christian homes 
 lies at the root of the social problem, and that 
 it is the duty of Christians to show what Chris- 
 tian family life can and should be when founded 
 on love. 
 
 2. ‘That Christians should work to secure for 
 others the necessaries and comforts of home 
 which they enjoy themselves. 
 
 3. That it is fundamental to Christianity to 
 regard every personality as of equal value in the 
 sight of God. 
 
 4. That Christians cannot tolerate the present 
 housing conditions, and that it is the imperative 
 duty of all Christians and all Churches cease- 
 lessly to demand and work, politically and other- 
 wise, for measures which will secure: 
 
 158 
 
CONCLUSIONS 
 
 (a) that such a number of new houses be 
 built as will completely meet the housing 
 shortage and abolish the slums ; 
 
 (6) that all families have adequate means 
 of subsistence and the reasonable comforts 
 and opportunities of life. 
 
 This involves both a standard of personal conduct 
 and an attitude towards public affairs. It involves 
 making Christianity the governing principle and 
 mainspring of action not merely in the home but 
 in the Borough Council, in Parliament, and in the 
 Departments of State. No Christian can ignore his 
 or her share in the responsibility for the government 
 of the country and for any neglect to deal with 
 pressing social abuses. 
 
 To solve the housing problem and to prevent 
 sweated wages and unemployment may call for 
 measures which will involve sacrifices by certain 
 sections of the community. Such sacrifices are as 
 much Christian obligations as voluntary subscrip- 
 tions to hospitals and to other ‘‘ Charities.”” What 
 our Lord said to the rich young ruler contains 
 lessons not merely for individuals but for nations. 
 No mechanical shaping and carrying out of legisla- 
 tion will have the full effect desired without that 
 moral and spiritual force which it is the part of the 
 Christian Church to pour into the national life. 
 
 159 
 
THE HOME 
 
 Signed : 
 R. L. Reiss (Chairman). 
 BucHANAN BLAKE. 
 EvizaABeTH M. Capsury. 
 MarcareT S. CALDER. 
 W. M’G. Eacar. 
 Marion FirzGera.p. 
 Epiru H. Gtuover. 
 Mavup M. Jrrrery. 
 ExvizaBpetH H. McKerrow. 
 P. Euste Petty. 
 We Ri PEL ie: 
 Mary L. Piercy. 
 Witt Reason. 
 Averit D. Sanperson-Furuniss. 
 J. Lionet Tayter. 
 Raymonp UNwIN. 
 
 _ Dorotuy L. Wise. 
 
 The members of the Commission who having 
 co-operated in the preparation of the above Report 
 attach their signatures, do so as individuals and in 
 no way commit the Churches or Societies of which 
 they are members. The acceptance of the Report 
 by a signatory denotes agreement with the general 
 substance of the Report, but not necessarily with 
 every detail. 
 
 160 
 
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION 
 
 I. 
 
 1. Trace the development of the home and consider what 
 events in history affected it. Has there been a general progress 
 until the present day, o is there any one period when you feel home 
 life was at its strongest ? 
 
 2. What was our Lord’s teaching about the home, and what 
 changes did it produce? 
 
 ~ 
 
 3. Consider the alternative suggestions to normal family life. 
 What are the advantages and disadvantages of these proposals? 
 
 4. What bearing have material conditions on home life? Is it 
 possible to divorce the spiritual from the material? Have 
 Christians any obligations towards social abuses? On what does 
 beauty in the home depend? Is it possible to have a beautiful 
 home without a big financial outlay? (See Everyday Religion, by 
 E. S$. Woods, Student Christian Movement.) 
 
 II. 
 
 1. On what does the importance of the Christian home rest? 
 Discuss the statement, “‘ The regenerating power of religion in other 
 social organisations can at best be temporary unless it is the founda- 
 tion of home life.” 
 
 2. Do you know of any successful homes that are not based on 
 Christianity? Is a definitely Christian home any better than 
 ordinary homes based on love and mutual forbearance? 
 
 3. Discuss the causes of home-making. Is there any specific 
 
 contribution Christians have to make on the subject of the 
 161 
 
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION 
 
 spirit of approach to marriage? How should this contribution 
 bemade? Does the Church give any teaching or preparation before 
 marriage? 
 
 4. Can you describe the ideal Christian family? What are the . 
 
 greatest obstacles in the way of its attainment? 
 
 Ii 
 
 yf 
 
 1. To what extent should parents subordinate themselves to 
 their children? Does unselfishness in parents breed selfishness in 
 children? Is it true to say that both parents have an equal place 
 and responsibility towards the children at all ages? (Cf. The New 
 Psychology and the Teacher, and The New Psychology and the Parent, 
 by Dr. Crichton Miller.) 
 
 2. Discuss the type of character needed in potential citizens, 
 and the various methods of upbringing for securing this. Consider 
 
 what are the most important things which parents have to teach 
 
 and the right methods of doing it, particularly with regard to 
 religion. 
 
 3. Consider what the Church can do to spread Christian teaching 
 about the home, to help the home-makers and to show children their 
 right duty to their parents. 
 
 IV. 
 
 1. Are outside interests (both for parents and for children) 
 desirable, or do they always distract from the home? ‘There is 
 frequently a conflict of loyalties between the home and public 
 work. What should be the right Christian attitude towards such 
 questions ? 
 
 2. Are class distinctions good or bad? How can the home play 
 its part in mitigating their evil effects? 
 
 3. How should servants be treated? Should they have meals 
 
 with the family? How many hours a day should they work? 
 162 
 
QUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION 
 
 4. Discuss the whole important interplay between the family and 
 the community, and consider how each can help the other on the 
 spiritual plane. 
 
 V. 
 
 It is stated in Chapter V that the home is the supreme place of 
 education and that it should be governed by equality in personal 
 values. Consider these two statements and think out their impli- 
 cations in all walks of life. How do they affect accepted ideas 
 about : 
 
 (1) Education. 
 
 (2) Nurses and nurserymaids. 
 (3) Poverty and unemployment. 
 (4) Servants. 
 
 (5) Outside interests? 
 
 VI. 
 
 1. If possible, the circle might make a survey of the local housing 
 position and needs. 
 
 2. What are the chief moral evils that arise from bad housing 
 conditions ? 
 
 3. How should houses be built? By private enterprise, by the 
 State, by the Church, by the Local Authority? 
 
 4. What are the particular problems of slum areas, large towns, 
 rural districts? How can these be met? 
 
 5. What are the main essentials in a house and its surroundings? 
 (See C.O.P.E.C. Questionnaire.) Why is town planning so 
 important? What are the chief requirements of a good town 
 plan? 
 
 VII. 
 
 1. To a great extent responsibility over social matters has shifted 
 from the individual to the community. How can corporate 
 responsibility be brought home? 
 
 163 
 
GUESTIONS FOR DISCUSSION 
 
 2. What can the individual Christian do to forward housing 
 reform ? 
 
 3. Consider the difference between poverty and destitution. 
 What are the main causes of extreme poverty? How can they be 
 mitigated ? 
 
 4. Why do riches make home life difficult? Discuss the fallacy 
 of luxury spending and Canon Barnett’s remark: “‘ God loveth a 
 cheerful taxpayer.” 
 
 7 
 
 VIII. 
 
 1. To what extent has the State a duty as “ over-parent”? Is 
 it desirable that the State should interfere between parents Pd 
 children ? 
 
 2. What can be done to help the over-worked mother? as a 
 scheme of domestic service on the same basis as the nursing service 
 practicable ? | 
 
 3. What is being done at present for mothers and babies and Sis 
 should it be extended? Consider particularly 
 (1) Milk supply, 
 (2) Home helps, 
 (3) Large families, 
 (4) Motherhood endowment. 
 (See publications of the Family Endowment Council, 50, Romney 
 Street, S.W. 1.) 
 
 4. Finally, we have to consider how Christian teaching can be’ 
 extended in the home and about the home, and how we can bring 
 Christian opinion to bear so that Christian homes are made more 
 possible. 
 
 Mapg AND PRINTED IN GREAT Britain. RicHAaRD CLay & Sons, LTD.,; 
 PRINTERS, BUNGAY, SUFFOLK. 
 
4 oe } » 
 ; 
 
 =e 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 \