. > ee eS gee eo : - <. uae - a : — ra nae SE -20 rae ba te ann ws Rory gerne nastnarett
ro Se eS EES pare, = Frntese ee hyriragneemenrnnnes SN OR aS Bo SE SS es Sam
Fe Rs ee ete PL FS EE BITS
a - > a: A ; — —-
err 2 G2 sgroerar
ee eee
= Sea tS remaioom eh t av el sor dn my a con me ALY Sw
RO EO BR a ae a A EE ne
be Sr SS RE PES POLIS VS PINE ET OT OT
(ee EEE =e
SS SU TOES RE SR SEE EE ES A MA TE SS ET AE ES BS SE NE eS ESE A ER SEE RE AO ET EA ARNE ME OR Ee A ar
OTL ONSEN I AT SN a Ea! AS ERP DIOL YAP LOE AOL LANA CE ET OM i ie Oe I AD I a VE al oe 0 GRE
BP 530 .T38 1925
The theosophical movement,
1875-1925
a : |
ae
eat
“
4
fF
- >
nn ie bait,
, 5 _" P
THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
eas
Mia (kan bee \4
mee 9 aus Ba,
‘i
si
Loy a
i,
;
pent
jer Wyte Io
Nevo
i
A,
vb hy
ao
i
ry
ENE
ee eae
eek ny Ye eee
if rw. ot sy, % { a f
1 vee
‘ : : att &
4 * P
‘ roa
Pe)
THE THEOSOPHICAL
MOVEMENT
1875-1925
A HISTORY AND A SURVEY
NG er gaa
PAIS ONS
i f) EY ay) Aa\ A,
<7 = RRS
—)
ny
NEW YORK
E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY
681 FIFTH AVENUE
CopYRIGHT, 1925
BY E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY
All Rights Reserved
Printed in the United States of America
“To all true Theosophists, in every coun-
try and of every race, for they called it
forth, and for them it was recorded.’’
ees
an ha
ie Mali 4
vi
PREFACE
There exists nowhere a collected and authentic recital
of the Theosophical Movement of the nineteenth century.
Yet, although a scant half century has elapsed since the
foundation of The Theosophical Society at New York
City, the work there begun has spread into all portions
of the civilized world, until the word Theosophy is a
familiar term to every educated mind. The teachings
known under that name have been more or less investi-
gated and adopted by millions, while its more earnest
students who have accepted it as a complete and satis-
factory explanation of all the problems of life, here and
hereafter, are numbered by thousands in every country
and of every race.
In an indirect but none the less powerful manner the
teachings of Theosophy have profoundly affected the
ideas and ideals of the race on the great questions of
ethics, of morality, of religion, philosophy and science,
so that today it may be truly said that there is nothing
worthy of the consideration of the human mind that has
not been leavened by the injection of Theosophical leaven.
It is not too much, therefore, to affirm that the direct and
indirect influence of Theosophy upon humanity in the
course of a single generation has been greater than that
of any other system ever promulgated, during as many
centuries as the Theosophical Movement numbers dec-
ades. And the Movement can as yet scarcely be said to
have passed the stage of its germinal impulsion.
The record of the Theosophical Movement is scattered
through thousands upon thousands of pages of books,
magazines, newspapers, pamphlets and other documents.
Many of these are extremely controversial in character,
many inaccurate, many contradictory and confusing. The
attempt to study, digest, collate and compare the im-
vil
viii PREFACE
mense literature of the subject is a monumental under-
taking. The writers have spent many years in connec-
tion with the work of the Theosophical Movement, and
their opportunities and facilities have been greater than
most. Yet they know only too well the impossibility of
doing anything like justice to the subject, or of affording
satisfactory replies to all questions of the sincere stu-
dent of its complexities. The very nature of the subject
forbids. For Theosophy, the Theosophical Movement,
and the real and true Theosophical Society have, each of
them, an esoteric as well as an exoteric side, and the
latter can never be fully grasped and understood but
through the former.
Some of this hidden side can be touched upon, some
documents referred to, some indications submitted, some
deductions offered for the consideration of the reflective
mind, but for by far the most important portion of the
esoteric aspect the student must rely upon his own in-
tuition: for the hidden side of Theosophy can only be
arrived at through the hidden nature of the student
himself.
Still another difficulty that confronts alike the writers
and the sincere student is the fact that many of those
who were active in the lifetime of the parent Theosophi-
cal Society are still living and now prominent, both in
the public eye, and as leaders and exponents of the many
conflicting theosophical and occult societies that have
sprung up in the past twenty-five years, since the death
of the original society. All these antagonistic organiza-
tions have their devoted adherents, their own particular
tenets and claims of pre-eminence and successorship. The
situation exactly parallels that of the early centuries of
Christianity. Rival pretensions to apostolic succession,
to knowledge, to authority, and to the possession of the
keys to the teachings of the Founders confront the in-
quirer. The danger is imminent that if a better knowl-
edge and understanding of the real teachings of The-
osophy, the real mission of the Theosophical Movement,
and the real facts in connection with the history of the
Parent Theosophical Society, are not made available for
PREFACE is
all those who may become interested, the fate that has
long since overtaken Brahminism, Buddhism and Chris-
tianity will inevitably befall the great Message of H. P.
Blavatsky.
For all the reasons expressed and implied, an acces-
sible record of the facts, as accurate a survey of their
significance and bearing on the present and on the future
as possible, is of the utmost moment to all sincere stu-
dents and to all earnest enquirers. Themselves members
of none of the existing organizations, but profoundly
convinced of the surpassing value of the noble philosophy
of Theosophy, the writers are moved to this attempt to
aid the unimpeded flow of the great stream of the The-
osophical Movement, not so much by any belief in their
own especial ability as by the conviction that that flow
is being impeded and corrupted by the partisanship and
pretensions of the leading exponents of the existing
societies. It is therefore addressed, not to any society or
societies, but to all true Theosophists, whether members
of any of the existing organizations or of none, and to
all true enquirers everywhere, who may be willing to ac-
cept truth wherever it may be found, and to defend it,
even looking popular prejudice—and their own—straight
in the face.
For the rest, it may be added that the Sytuasus which
precedes the text will, it is hoped, be found, both by the
general reader and the serious student, to be more satis-
factory than an index. The abundant direct citations and
the collateral references included in the text render
superfluous a separate bibliography and will, it is thought,
enable those so minded to verify at first hand every minor
as well as major subject discussed.
ee, ~ bet 7
AS AG ame Sa eran
pit VP dra WR ges
r . a rete TD 2 :
| Pres
y t Hy Pieris ; }
? a ky Wy aye |
‘ (Sie
; ae oe le feat fi on OE Uma erd Wy aa oo i :
CET Sn SG he Ly eae eka SUNT CR eRe CE
o we i ing } 3
| | | | A sa)
{
f
1?
ay;
Pin
vee 7 4
ee bale ee
Sh eh 3 ‘i
eth |
Lath
jt TNR et
on
Cl lpia a Lon
Py,
wee Cet Ate
at ses "
} inn bole Rt.
a Om : ¢ {me ptt :
seats
Stree
eS
= a
A Be
« if Is rad hy %
lh
nape
an
iO
| sa | a Aaa ; FY, ‘ 14 Y
SiR ih
ae ae +
CHAPTER
XVI.
XVIT.
XVIII.
XIX.
XX,
XXI.
CONTENTS
CHANNELS OF THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT .
THe PARENT THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY
*“Ists UNVEILED’’ .
Earuy Days oF THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY
THe S.P.R. AND THE THEOSOPHICAL PHE-
NOMENA
THE REPORT OF THE S.P.R.
DIvIsIons AMONG T'HEOSOPHISTS—NEW PUvBLI-
CATIONS
Esoreric AND Exorertc ASPECTS OF THE THEO-
SOPHICAL MOVEMENT
H.P.B., OLtcort, AND JUDGE .
THE FORMATION OF THE ESOTERIC SECTION
THE WoRK OF THE ESOTERIC SECTION
MaseL CoLLINS AND PROFESSOR COUES .
THE CourEs-CoLLINS CHARGES AND THEIR AF-
TERMATH .
The New York Sun Lipeu CASE .
Oxtcotr Versus H.P.B.
Outcott’s ATTEMPT TO CENTRALIZE ALL AU-
THORITY
H.P.B. Taxes CHARGE OF THE T.S. IN EUROPE
Deratu or H.P.B.—HeEr Last Messaces
THE CRISIS IN THE SOCIETY
ATTEMPTS TO SUPERSEDE H.P.B.’s INFLUENCE .
Growing DIvERGENCES—OLcoTT RESIGNS AS
PRESIDENT
xi
PAGE
xii
CHAPTER
XXIT.
XXIII.
XXIV.
XXYV.
XXVI.
XXVII.
XXVIII.
XXIX.
XXX.
NO.O.8 F
AXXIT.
XXXII.
ROX.
XXXYV.
XXXVI.
CONTENTS
CONVENTION OF 1892—OnLcoTtt WITHDRAWS His
RESIGNATION .
H.P.B.’s ‘‘Succressors’’—THE PUBLICATION OF
‘‘Onup Diary LEAVES’”’
CONTROVERSY OVER H.P.B.’s Status As AGENT
OF THE MASTERS .
ANNIE BESANT IN AMERICA, 1892-1893
BEGINNINGS OF THE ‘‘JUDGE CASE’’ .
Mrs. BESANT CHANGES SIDES
THE AMERICAN SECTION SUPPORTS JUDGE .
THe ‘‘JupiciaL ENquiry’’ IN LONDON .
BRITISH CONVENTION DISMISSES CASE AGAINST
J UDGE
THE ‘‘ EASTERN DIvISION’’ AND ‘‘ WESTERN D1I-
VISION ’”’ .
Westminster Gazette ATTACKS THE SOCIETY
Mrs Besant Tries to Drive JupGE OuT OF
THE SOCIETY .
THE AMERICAN SECTION DECLARES Its AUTON-
OMY AND ExuEcts JupGE Its Lirg-PRESIDENT
JUDGE’S DEATH AND THE TINGLEY ‘‘SUCCESSOR-
SHIP’’
PRESENT AND FUTURE OF THE THEOSOPHICAL
MovEMENT
PAGE
334
301
380
405
425
441
468
493
o19
D09
O74
596
622
653
689
ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
CHAPTER I. CHANNELS OF THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT 1
The Theosophical Movement the story of Spiritual and Intel-
lectual evolution—Religions and systems of thought, govern-
ments, sects and parties, landmarks of its cyclical progression
through the ages—The Reformation, Free Masonry, the Ameri-
can Republic, the abolition of human slavery, all steps—the
‘‘divine right’’ of God and the ‘‘divine rights’’ of kings alike
obstacles to progress—all physical evolution preceded and accom-
panied by intellectual and moral growth—upward impulses due
to the inspiration of higher evolved Intelligences—they work
through appropriate channels—modern signs of the Theosophical
Movement abundantly in evidence—Western interest in oriental
philosophy and religion—the great influence of the ‘‘Light of
Asia’’—the tremendous effect of Darwin’s ‘‘ Origin of Species’’
on prevailing religious ideas of ‘‘creation,’’ God and Nature—
Buckle’s intuitive perception of the rise of new religions and
philosophies—the great work of iconoclasts like Ingersoll and
Bradlaugh, of liberal preachers like Kingsley and Channing—
the Bastilles of orthodoxy no longer impregnable—Spiritualism
an index of the transitional state of mind in religion—phenomena
and forces ignored by Science—the writings of Allan Kardec—
Spiritualism devoid alike of morality and philosophy—becomes
in a generation the faith of millions—due to awakening psychic
faculties—Madame Blavatsky enters the Western arena—her ex-
hibition of powers exercised at will—her totally unknown
philosophy of Life—her first efforts made with the Spiritualists.
CuHaptTer II. THe PARENT THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY. ... hs
Madame Blavatsky comes to New York in 1873—meets Col.
H. 8S. Oleott in 1874 at the Eddy farmhouse—she controls the
exhibition of phenomena unknown to the spectators—Olcott a
prominent lawyer and newspaper writer, a life-long Spiritualist
—becomes greatly interested in H.P.B.’s powers and knowledge
—introduces her to Wm. Q. Judge, a young lawyer—Oleott and
Judge become pupils of H.P.B.—Oleott’s book, ‘‘ People from
the Other World,’’ draws public attention to the phenomenal
powers of H.P.B.—her apartment dubbed ‘‘the Lamasery’’ be-
comes the scene of a never ending throng of visitors and mar-
vel seekers—Oleott proposes a ‘‘ Miracle Club,’’ which falls
through—the Theosophical Society established in November,
1875, by H.P.B., Oleott and Judge—other early members—most
of them Spiritualists who turn enemies—teachings of H.P.B.
entirely opposed to the theories of Spiritualism—many Euro-
pean and Indian Fellows join the new Society—The Arya Somaj
and Swami Sarasvati—the original Society democratic in organi-
zation—no restrictions on freedom of conscience or liberty of
xiii
xiv
ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
thought—the ‘‘Three Objects’’ of the Parent Theosophical So-
ciety—H.P.B. writes ‘‘Isis Unveiled,’’ published in 1877—
goes with Col. Oleott to India, leaving Judge in America—rapid
growth of the Society in the Orient—early publications and
formation of new ‘‘Branches,’’ East and West.
CHapris DLS Sie arr ele i ces eee ee
‘*Tsis Unveiled’’ a Master Key to the mysteries of science and
religion, modern and ancient—dedicated to the Theosophical
Society with whose ‘‘Three Objects’’ its teachings are in cor-
relation—discusses the roots of all religion, the negations of
science, and the phenomena of Spiritualism—declares all three
before a blank wall only to be penetrated by recourse to the
wisdom of the ancient sages—affirms the existence of the
Wisdom-Religion, as the true Source of the Theosophical Move-
ment in all ages—H.P.B. avows her own intimate acquaintance
with living Adepts—phenomenal powers over space, time and
matter—proves the fallacies of ‘‘exact’’ science by the testimony
of its own exponents—all claims of religious ‘‘infallibility’’
mere theological dogmas—raises her voice for spiritual freedom
and enfranchisement from all tyranny whether of Science or
Theology—postulates a double evolution, spiritual and intellectual
—the Wisdom-Religion the only philosophy which can reconcile
faith and knowledge—Metempsychosis, in its esoteric sense—
the solution of the ‘‘missing links’’ in Science and the mysteries
that baffle religionists—ancient Magic a Divine Science—Cyclie
Law, or Karma, the explanation of the rise and fall of civiliza-
tions—the periodic destructions and renovations of Nature—
every problem of existence solved by the Wise Men of old—the
secret and unbroken chain of the Adepts of the Great Lodge—
the great propositions of Occultism—there is no miracle, every-
thing under Law (Karma)—Spirit, Mind and Matter the evolv-
ing Trinity in Nature and in Man—Adeptship versus Medium-
ship—the Trinity of Nature the lock of Magic—the Trinity of
Man the Key that fits it.
CuHAapter IV. Earty Days or THE THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY
The Theosophical Society an attempt to form a human asso-
ciation on the basis of the Lodge of Adepts, pure Altruism—
H.P.B. not deceived in regard to the obstacles to be met—sece-
tarian religious prejudices, the great barrier to true Fraternity
—the Second Object of the T.S.—the idea of ‘‘miracles’’ and
materialistic hypotheses of modern science the great enemies of
true knowledge, hence the Third Object—Man inherently per-
fectible, not a mortal fallible being—Adepts the living proof of
the divinity inherent in every man—the Wisdom-Religion can
be known and its Adepts found by any sincere man—the real
enemies of human welfare—bound to array themselves against
H.P.B., her Society and her mission—who those enemies are—
orthodox religions, materialistic science, pseudo-scientists, pre-
tended authoritves—the mercenaries and parasites of the press—
‘“Tsis Unveiled’’ neither a revelation nor an arbitrary theory—a
statement of verifiable facts, physical and metaphysical—rests
upon its own inherent worth—the Theosophical Society a body of
students—dependent upon self-induced and self-devised efforts
to study and apply the teachings of Theosophy—rejected and
opposed by the Spiritualists, its natural allies, because of its
PAGE
26
42
ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS XV
PAGE
teachings on after-death states and conditions—greatly helped
in the East because of the natural mysticism of the inhabitants
—Swami Sarasvati and his Arya Somaj originally sympathetic
—Buddhist and Hindu friends gained for the Society in India—
Sumangali, Damodar Mavalankar and Subba Row, powerful
allies—A. P. Sinnett and A. O. Hume influential friends among
the English—The Theosophist founded in 1879—Oleott’s ‘‘ Bud-
dhist Catechism’’ published—this and his lecturing tours gain
many adherents—Missionary hostility aroused at the success and
propaganda of the Society—H.P.B. charged with being a Rus-
sian spy and an immoral woman with Col. Olcott for her dupe
—other calumnies—charges recanted by enemies—first internal
disturbance in the London Lodge—Dr. George Wyld’s defection
—Dr. Anna Bonus Kingsford’s ‘‘ Perfect Way’’—her pamphlet
assault on Mr. Sinnett’s ‘‘Esoteric Buddhism’’—Mr. Subba
Row replies—Mr. C. C. Massey precipitates further troubles—the
‘“Kiddle charges’’ of plagiarism by the Master—the storm
raised in England and France in 1884—H.P.B. and Col. Oleott
go to Paris and London—meet Mr. Solovyoff—Judge comes to
Paris, goes to India, and returns to America via London—H.P.B.
and Col. Oleott meet leading members of the Society for Psy-
chical Research while in London—the S.P.R. plans to investigate
the ‘‘ Theosophical phenomena.’’
CHaptrr V. THE S.P.R. AND THE THEOSOPHICAL PHE-
NOMENA MERE. SR SERRA AD RRR aa TP ad RNa MOR Reet adh ear 59
The Society for Psychical Research preceded by the Dialectical
Society—that Society investigates Spiritualism in 1869—pub-
lishes its Report in 1870—concludes phenomena of Spiritualism
are genuine—transcend all known laws—should be investigated
scientifically—ceriticisms of the Report by London papers—
Professor Crookes investigates Spiritualism—publishes his results
in 1872—Mr. Crookes assailed as savagely as Darwin—no ad-
vance in understanding of Spiritualistic phenomena during next
ten years—the ‘‘Unseen Universe’’—the Society for Psychical
Research established in 1882—its chief sponsors Spiritualists—
some of them members of the Theosophical Society also—many
well-known men and women join the S.P.R.—it begins its in-
vestigation of the ‘‘Theosophical phenomena’’ in the summer
of 1884—Olecott, Sinnett, Chatterji and others examined—H.P.B.
interviewed—many other witnesses to the phenomena of H.P.B.
give testimony—Preliminary Report of the S.P.R. issued in the
fall of 1884—admits the prima facie genuineness of the phe-
nomena—reservations due to the charges just made in India by
the Coulombs against the good faith of H.P.B.—declares a fur-
ther investigation necessary in India—appoints Mr. Richard
Hodgson for that purpose—the story of the Coulomb charges of
fraud against H.P.B.—H.P.B. shipwrecked in 1871—goes to
Cairo—meets Madame Coulomb—is succored by her—starts a
society to investigate Western Spiritualism—the attempt a fail-
ure—H.P.B. returns to Russia in 1872—goes to Paris and then
to New York in 1873—Madame Coulomb marries in Egypt—
meets with reverses—is living in poverty in Ceylon when H.P.B.
and Col. Olcott come to India—the Coulombs appeal for aid—
go to India—join the Theosophical Society in 1880—are given
employment at headquarters—Madame Coulomb a bigoted Chris-
tian and Spiritualist medium—hecomes jealous of H.P.B.’s sue-
cessful mission—iries to extort money from members—circulates
Xvi
ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
slanders about H.P.B.—is brought to ‘‘trial’’ by the members
of the Council during absence of H.P.B. and Olcott in Europe
in the summer of 1884—the Coulombs communicate with Madras
missionaries—are expelled from the Theosophical Society—are
supported by the missionaries—the Coulomb charges published
in the Christian College Magazine and in a pamphlet—the out-
burst occasioned.
CuHapter VI. THE REpoRT OF THES.P.R. . . . .
Madame Blavatsky resigns from Theosophical Society when Cou-
lomb charges made public—resignation refused by Oleott under
pressure—H.P.B. writes London Times and Pall Mall Gazette
pronouncing charges a conspiracy—H.P.B. and Oleott return to
India at end of 1884—H.P.B. insists charges must be met by
court proceedings against the Coulombs—Oleott and the Hindus
oppose legal action—the Adyar Convention declines to defend
H.P.B. while affirming belief in her bona fides—Oleott and Sin-
nett already mistrust H.P.B.—she resigns from the Society and
leaves India early in 1885—Mr. Hodgson in India during the
Convention and desertion of H.P.B. by Theosophists—power-
fully affected by the lukewarmness and doubts of leading Theoso-
phists—returns to England and submits his report to Committee
of §8.P.R.—Hodgson’s findings adopted by Committee in June,
1885—Report of the S.P.R. published following December—
Conclusions reached—H.P.B.’s phenomena fraudulent—in a long-
continued conspiracy to deceive public—Coulomb letters and
Mahatma letters written by H.P.B.—declare H.P.B. ‘‘one of the
most accomplished, ingenious, and interesting impostors in his-
tory’’—the Report of the 8.P.R. examined critically shows it to
be wholly ex parte—no safeguards employed to ascertain and
render justice—the investigation that of a rival society con-
trolled by Spiritualists—the S.P.R. not interested in philosophy
or ethics—avid for phenomena—ignorant of Occultism—contra-
dictions and inconsistencies of S.P.R. Committee shown from its
own Report—Committee relies wholly on Mr. Massey’s suspicions,
the Coulomb charges, and the opinions of the London handwriting
experts—Mr. Massey’s suspicions shown to be without tangible
foundation—the Coulombs shown out of their own mouths to be
lying tricksters—the handwriting experts shown as first declar-
ing the Mahatma letters could not have been written by H.P.B.
—then, at Hodgson’s solicitation, changing their opinion to the
contrary—the expert Netherclift shown to have sworn posi-
tively in the Parnell case to the opposite of the facts—the mo-
tives of all adverse witnesses shown to have been culpable and
their testimony impeached—more than one hundred responsible
witnesses affirm the genuineness of phenomena witnessed by them
—the 8.P.R. Committee declares these to have been victims of
‘‘hallucination’’—Hodgson’s findings examined—a mass of sus-
picions and contradictory conjectures to account for facts testi-
fied to—Hodgson recognizes necessity for showing a motive suf-
ficient to account for H.P.B.’s alleged fraud during twenty years
—rejects supposition that she was influenced by greed or ambi-
tion—submits theory that H.P.B. was a Russian spy—her Society
and her phenomena a cloak to conceal her designs against British
rule in India.
PAGE
(6
ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS XVii
PAGH
CHAPTER VII. Drvisions AMONG THEOSOPHISTS—NEW
PUBLICATIONS . . . Pi Oa it ‘ we (94
Effect on Theosophists of Goulamnbs S.P.R. PRS cairns Michtoote
goes to Burmah—H.P.B. desperately ill—attempt to unseat Ol-
cott, who returns to Adyar—H.P.B. supports him—but tells him
in deserting her the Theosophists have deserted the Masters—
H.P.B. resigns and leaves India for Europe—Damodar leaves
Adyar and goes to the Masters—the Society in India languishes
and falls into public contempt—H.P.B. finds friends and sup-
porters in Kurope—Oleott and Indians find they cannot continue
without H.P.B.—Convention at close of 1885 invites her to re-
sume her office of Corresponding Secretary—refuses resignation
of Olcott who is ready to retire as President—temporary restora-
tion of harmony among Theosophists—H.P.B. in Europe, first in
Italy, then Germany, then Belgium—her sickness, poverty,
courage, good temper and unremitting exertions—visited by many
noted Theosophists—her physical condition desperate for two
years—carried to London by Countess Wachtmeister and the
Keightleys in summer of 1887—her presence a great stimulus to
Theosophy in England—new publications, the Sphyna, the Lotus
and Lucifer—the ‘‘Blavatsky Lodge’’ formed at London—NSin-
nett publishes ‘‘ Incidents in the Life of H. P. Blavatsky’’ as an
offset to S.P.R. Report—new books—‘‘Light on the Path’’—
‘“Five Years of Theosophy’’—‘‘Man: Fragments of Forgotten
History ’’—revival of Theosophical spirit and work—in Asia—
in Europe—in America—Judge the heart of the Movement in
America—rebuilds the Society—Judge begins The Path in 1886
—secures the establishment of the American ‘‘ Board of Con-
trol’’ by Oleott—new Branches and Lodges in the United States
—Judge forms the ‘‘ American Section of the T.S.’’—first really
democratic organization in the Society—Judge becomes its Gen-
eral Secretary—the work now in three streams—Judge in Amer-
ica—H.P.B. in Europe—Olcott in India—all in outward concord.
Cuaprer VIII. Esoreric aNp ExotTreric ASPECTS OF THE
THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT . . ieee LEO
The ‘‘ Esoteric Section of the T.S.’’—the isdeephiea Movement
has an esoteric as well as an exoteriec aspect—the Theosophical
Society merely the public experimental aspect of the Movement
and its Third Section—the First Section the Lodge of Masters
—the Second Section composed of accepted, lay and probationary
Chelas or Disciples—the Masters or First Section never pub-
licly known—the Second Section kept secret, but probationers
accepted privately—Judge and Oleott the earliest members of
the Second Section known—first public notice of the Three See-
tions in India in 1880—hints and articles on Chelaship there-
after appear at intervals in The Theosophist—difference be-
tween Occultism and Spiritualism—Chelaship and mediumship
opposed courses—reasons for secrecy in connection with ‘‘ Chela-
ship of the Second Section’’—the immense change in the work
of H.P.B. and Judge after 1886—shown in contents of Lucifer
and The Path—illustrative articles cited—‘‘the ordeals of Chela-
ship’’—practically exemplified in case of Mrs. Cables and Mr.
W. T. Brown—Mrs. Cables a Spiritualist Christian with mystical
tendencies—begins publication of The Occult Word—W. T.
Brown a ‘‘probationary Chela’’—becomes a ‘‘ Rosicrucian’’—
joins Mrs. Cables—they seek for ‘‘communications from the
xviii ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Mahatmas’’—receive no ‘‘signs’’—publish a ‘‘manifesto’’—
H.P.B. replies—shows dangers and requirements of Chelaship—
—cites Brown’s own ease in illustration without naming him—
Mrs. Cables and Brown leave the Society—failures frequent
among candidates for Chelaship—out of hundreds ‘‘one only’’
achieves full success—seven years successful probation the mini-
mum requirement before ‘‘communication with Masters’’ possi-
ble on both sides—failure of Theosophists to lead the life.
CuHaprTmr IX, H.P.B., OLcorr'anp JupDGE . . . . . 127
H.P.B. the Messenger of the Masters—Judge next to her in
importance esoterically—Oleott the public head and front of the
exoteric work—Oleott’s limitations and obstacles—his own let-
ter quoted—Oleott, the probationary Chela, fails often and upsets
his work as President—his attitude toward H.P.B. and Judge
—his friendship and intimacy with those who afterward be-
came enemies or traitors—Massey, Prof. Coues—Oleott’s slights
to H.P.B.—his partiality for Subba Row—friction between
Subba Row and H.P.B. over the ‘‘Sevenfold Classification’ ’—the
contentions in The Theosophist—Judge intervenes in the con-
_troversy—internal frictions cause of all external troubles—
failure of Theosophists to adhere to First Object and of pro-
bationary Chelas to keep their Pledges—could not endure correc-
tion at hands of H.P.B. or Judge—‘‘ Pledge Fever’’ real cause
of stormy course of the Society—necessity for restoration of
the Movement to true lines—Judge advises formation of
‘“Ksoteric Section’’—draws up its Rules—Oleott torn by fears
and doubts—the battle between the ‘‘Three Founders’’ prior to
the formation of the ‘‘Esoterie Section’’—not disclosed till
long afterwards in ‘‘Old Diary Leaves’’—neither H.P.B. nor
Judge ever wrote anything personal—never ‘‘ washed Theosoph-
ical dirty linen in public’’—story of friction between the
Founders unknown to Theosophists at the time—disclosed long
afterward by Olcott—‘‘Old Diary Leaves’’ not a history but
an autobiography.
CHAPTER X. THE FORMATION OF THE ESOTERIC SECTION . 144
The ‘‘critical period’’ preceding the formation of the ‘‘ Esoteric
Section’’ of the T.S.—H.P.B. discusses Oleott’s nature in a
letter to Dr. Franz Hartmann in 1886—Oleott and others never
understood either Masters or H.P.B.—Oleott sincere but ‘‘ lacks
in the psychological portion of his brain’’—H.P.B.’s story of
her difficulties—trying to aid others to perception of the facts
—Oleott tells his story at length in ‘‘Old Diary Leaves’’—
thinks H.P.B. wise, foolish and fanatic—opposes establishment
of Lucifer and of ‘‘ Blavatsky Lodge’’—offended at H.P.B.’s
course in the Subba Row controversy—discusses H.P.B.’s nature
—calls her ‘‘insulted and misunderstood Messenger’’—then says
she ‘‘frets and worries over mares’ nests’’—ealls the Judge-
Coues controversy a ‘‘personal quarrel’’—gives his version of
the storm preceding the ‘‘Esoterie Section’’—ecalls H.P.B. a
‘*mad person,’’ ‘‘hyperexcited hysterical woman’ ’—discloses
that H.P.B. was prepared to leave the T.S. and form a new
Society of her own if he does not reform—the Hindu ‘‘Coun-
cil’’ frightened at H.P.B.’s stand—more trouble in the Paris
Branch—Oleott makes it an excuse to go to Europe in 1888—
to ‘‘fight it out’’ with H.P.B.—first overrules her then rescinds
his action—confirms H.P.B.’s ‘‘interference’’ as within her
ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS xix
PAGE
‘Constitutional rights’’—Oleott receives a letter on shipboard
in 1888 direct from the Master—wrongly relates it in ‘‘Old
Diary Leaves’’ to the visit in 1884—the Master’s letter a
phenomenon indeed—it reproaches Oleott for his attitude and
conduct towards H.P.B.—declares that it is she who is their
direct agent—afiirms that ‘‘with occult matters she has every-
thing to do’’—warns Olcott to attend to his own business—tells
him he will have to suffer for his injustice to H.P.B.—the
letter effective for the time being—Judge goes to London and
the Three Founders effect a reconciliation—H.P.B. issues public
notice of the Esoteric Section, accompanied by an ‘‘ official
authorization’’ from Olcott—joint note of H.P.B. and Oleott
to all Theosophists—Oleott afterwards takes credit to himself
for the outecome—‘‘ pacifies H.P.B.’’
CHAPTER XI. THE WorK OF THE Esoteric SECTION .. 163
‘“Old Diary Leaves’’ tells the story of Oleott’s return to India
late in 1888 for the ‘‘ Adyar Parliament’’—his Address to the
Convention—never set himself up as a competent* teacher—the
Esoteric Section H.P.B.’s sole .responsibility—glosses the Euro-
pean events to show himself the leading actor—the Convention
of the American Section in April, 1889, following—a letter read
from H.P.B.—Judge’s respect and reverence for H.P.B. in
contrast with Olcott’s attitude—H.P.B.’s letter refers to the
Esoteric Section—formed to work for Theosophy under her
direction—gives a warning direct from Masters—Altruism
Their object—Theosophists must strive for true fraternity—
Preliminary Memorandum to candidates for the Esoteric Sec-
tion—the Pledge required—secrecy, service and study—the
Esoteric Section necessary because the T.S. had proved after
thirteen years a ‘‘dead failure’’ and a ‘‘sham’’—the Esoteric
Section not for ‘‘practical occultism’’—for brotherly union,
mutual help, and the salvation of the T.S.—other extracts from
the Preliminary Memorandum and Book of Rules.
CHAPTER XII. Mapet CoLuuIns AND ProFressor CovEes . 178
The Esoteric Section promptly brings about Pledge Fever
in the T.S.—the great storm of 1889-90—Mabel Collins and
Prof. Coues the conscious and unconscious instruments—Mabel
Collins joins London Lodge in 1884—a ‘‘psychic’’ with no
knowledge of Occultism—medium for ‘‘Light on the Path’’
and ‘‘The Gates of Gold’’—becomes Associate Editor. of
Lucifer with H.P.B.—acquires great Theosophical reputation—
suddenly dropped from Lucifer in February, 1889—Prof. Coues
of Catholic descent and training—highly educated—noted scien-
tific authority and writer—interested in ‘‘ psychical research’ ’—
joins T.S. at London in 1884—becomes member of American
Board of Control—establishes the Gnostic Branch of the Ameri-
can Section T.S., at Washington, D. C.—aids in establishing an
American Society for Psychical Research—tries to control T.S.
in United States—Judge’s cautions—Coues corresponds with
H.P.B., Judge and Olcott, trying to set them at odds with each
other—Oleott nearly succumbs—letter from Oleott to Coues—
Coues made Chairman at American Section Convention of 1888
at Chicago—gives the Chicago Tribune a spurious ‘‘ Mahatma
message’ ’—admits it to Judge—denies it to H.P.B.—his letters
to Judge and H,P,B.—his hypocrisy and thirst for notoriety
xX
ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
and power—H.P.B. replies to him—speaks plainly—refuses to
countenance his ‘‘messages’’ or his ambitions—he demands to
be made head of the American Section as the price of his
allegiance—his offer rejected—not present at the Convention of
April, 1889.
CuapTer XIII. Tar Coves-CoLtuins CHARGES AND THEIR
AFTERMATH . .
Coues sends a letter to the Religio-Philosophical Journal of
May 11, 1889—Bundy, Coleman, Michael Angelo Lane and
Mabel Collins enlisted in Coues’ campaign to ruin Judge and
H.P.B.—Coues’ letter jeers at the ‘‘Theosophical mahatmas’’
—quotes a letter from Mabel Collins—says he never met Miss
Collins personally—wrote her first in 1885 asking real source of
‘‘Light on the Path’’—she replied that it was ‘‘dictated to
her by one of the adepts’’ of H.P.B.—no intervening communi-
cation—now ‘‘unexpectedly’’ he receives letter which he gives
—Miss Collins declares her original statement false—knows
nothing of existence of any Master—made her false statement
because H.P.B. ‘‘begged and implored’’ her to—the Coues-
Collins’ charges critically examined—show Coues a conscienceless
schemer and Mabel Collins a mediumistic dupe of Coues—their
combined testimony proved false from their own evidence—
collateral and chronological facts show baselessness and im-
possibility of allegations in regard to H.P.B.—aftermath of
events—Mabel Collins sues H.P.B. for libel—her own attorneys
dismiss the suit on .being shown a letter of Mabel Collins in
H.P.B.’s possession—the real mysteries involved in the origin
of Collins’ ‘‘inspired’’ books—Mabel Collins a ‘‘failure in
occultism’’—dismissed, with M. A. Lane, from the Esoteric
Section—Coues never a member of the Section—admission re-
fused him.
CHAPTER XIV. The New York Sun Lipset CASE .. .
Professor Coues’ case taken up by Judge—the Executive Com-
mittee of the American Section expels Coues from the T.S.—
the Convention in April, 1890, approves the expulsion—the
Gnostic Branch dischartered—Coues plans revenge—the New
York Sum joins in the fray—calls H.P.B. an ‘‘impostor,’’ lauds
Coues for exposing her ‘‘humbug religion’’—followed by full-
page interview with Coues—he rehashes all the old slanders on
H.P.B.—charges Judge with duplicating in America H.P.B.’s
frauds in England—the ‘‘mahatmas’’ a hoax and their ‘‘mes-
sages’’ invented by H.P.B. and Judge—charges H.P.B. with
immorality—Judge brings suit for libel against Sun—H.P.B.
follows—her letter in The Path—no evasion of the issues—the
Sun fights the case for two years—no evidence obtainable to
support the charges made—the Sun publishes in 1892 a full
retraction and repudiates Coues—retraction accompanied by
publication in Sun of a long article by Judge in defense of
H.P.B.—Sun says editorially ‘‘ Mr. Judge’s article disposes of all
questions regarding Madame Blavatsky as presented by Dr.
Coues’’—the Sun libel case a complete vindication of H.P.B.
—infamy of subsequent reiteration of exploded slanders by
Count Witte and Margot Tennant—Coues disgraced by outcome
of suits—retires to obscurity—importance of the Coues-Collins-
Sun battle—should be familiar to all students.
PAGH
195
211
ANALYTICAL TABLE OF CONTENTS xxi
PAGE
CHAPTER “XiV 4) OLCOTT. VERSUS -HP.B. ee Se ee 296
Esoteric aspect of the Coues struggle—cycles in Theosophical
Movement—the Three Founders the personification of the Three
Sections of the Movement—a breach between the Sections in
the first ten years—Olcott and others’ failure to defend H.P.B.
in 1885 the sign of the rupture—first doubts—then dissent and
dissimulation—then temporising—then repudiation of the Oc-
eult status of H.P.B.—the long list of ‘‘failures in occultism’’
in the first thirteen years—Coues counted on Olcott’s support—
Olcott becomes frightened at possible consequences to Society
and himself—refuses to align himself with his colleagues—but
does not openly support Coues—blinded by jealousy and vanity
—‘Old Diary Leaves’’ discloses Olcott’s inner attitude and
struggles—his ‘‘ pitched battle’? with H.P.B. in 1888 over the
Esoteric Section— These
°See The Word for October, 1915, article ‘‘Colonel Olcott: a Reminis-
cence.’’ The anonymous writer was in fact Mrs. Laura Langford (Mrs.
L. C. Holloway) one of the two authors of ‘‘Man: Fragment of Forgotten
History.’’
“OLD DIARY LEAVES” 373
things being recognized, justice can be done to his col-
leagues and to the ‘‘true history of the Theosophical
Society’? without doing injustice to Henry 8. Olcott.
Until even justice is done to all, how can the work of
the Theosophical Movement be restored? And how can
that justice be done except in the spirit of the Preface
of ‘‘Isis Unveiled’’? The investigator must proceed ‘‘in
all sincerity; he must do even justice, and speak the
truth alike without malice or prejudice; he must show
neither mercy for enthroned error, nor reverence for
usurped authority. He must demand for a spoliated
past, that credit for its achievements which has been too
long withheld. He must call for a restitution of bor-
rowed robes, and the vindication of glorious but calum-
niated reputations.”’
‘Old Diary Leaves,’’ after serial publication in The
Theosophist during three years, were issued in book form
in 1895. This first volume contains a ‘‘ Foreword’’ espe-
cially written by Col. Olcott. His real motives in writ-
ing his reminiscences are there for the first time publicly
acknowledged—motives entirely unknown and unsus-
pected by Theosophical students during their magazine
publication. He says:
The controlling impulse to prepare these pa-
pers was a desire to combat a growing tendency
within the Society to deify Mme. Blavatsky, and
to give her commonest literary productions a
quasi-inspirational character. Her transparent
faults were being blindly ignored, and the pinch-
beck screen of pretended authority drawn be-
tween her actions and legitimate criticism.
Those who had least of her actual confidence,
and hence knew least of her private character,
were the greatest offenders in this direction. It
was but too evident that unless I spoke out what
I alone knew, the true history of our movement
could never be written, nor the actual merit of
my wonderful colleague become known. In these
pages I have, therefore, told the truth about her
374
For contrast one has but to turn to the Henry S. Ol-
eott of the summer of 1891, immediately after the death
of H.P.B. Lucfer for August 15 of that year con-
tains a long memorial article by Col. Olcott, entitled
THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
and about the beginnings of the Society—truth
which nobody can gainsay. . . . I have pursued
my present task to its completion, despite the
fact that some of my most influential colleagues
have, from what I consider mistaken loyalty
to ‘‘H.P.B.,’’ secretly tried to destroy my influ-
ence, ruin my reputation, reduce the circulation
of my magazine, and prevent the publication of
my book. ...
.. . Karma forbid that I should do her a
featherweight of injustice, but if there ever ex-
isted a person in history who was a greater con-
glomeration of good and bad, light and shadow,
wisdom and indiscretion, spiritual sight and
lack of common sense, I cannot recall the name,
the circumstances or the epoch.
‘‘H.P.B.’s Departure.’’ We quote:
... There is no one to replace Helena Pe-
trovna, nor can she ever be forgotten. Others
have certain of her gifts, none has them all.
.. . Her life, as I have known it these past
seventeen years, as friend, colleague and col-
laborator, has been a tragedy, the tragedy of a
martyr-philanthropist. Burning with zeal for
the spiritual welfare and intellectual enfran-
chisement of humanity, moved by no selfish in-
spiration, giving herself freely and without price
to her altruistic work, she has been hounded to
her death-day, by the slanderer, the bigot and
the Pharisee. . . . In temperament and abilities
as dissimilar as any two persons could well be,
and often disagreeing radically in details, we
have yet been of one mind and heart as regards
the work in hand and in our reverent allegiance
“OLD DIARY LEAVES” 375
to our Teachers and Masters, its pianners and
overlookers. We both knew them personally,
she a hundred times more intimately than I.
. . . She was pre-eminently a double-selfed per-
sonality, one of them very antipathetic to me
and some others. ... One seeing us together
would have said I had her fullest confidence, yet
the fact is that, despite seventeen years of in-
timacy in daily work, she was an enigma to me
to the end. Often I would think I knew her per-
fectly, and presently discover that there were
deeper depths in her selfhood I had not sounded.
I could never find out who she was, not as Helena
Petrovna,... but as ‘‘H.P.B.,’’ the mysteri-
ous individuality which wrote, and worked
wonders. ...
We had each our department of work—hers
the mystical, mine the practical. In her line,
she infinitely excelled me and every other of her
colleagues. I have no claim at all to the title
of metaphysician, nor to anything save a block
of very humble knowledge. ...
.. . She knew the bitterness and gloom of
physical life well enough, often saying to me that
her true existence only began when nightly she
had put her body to sleep and went out of it to
the Masters. I can believe that, from often
sitting and watching her from across the table,
when she was away from the body, and then
when she returned from her soul-flight and re-
sumed occupancy, aS one might call it. When
she was away the body was like a darkened
house, when she was there it was as though the
windows were brilliant with lights within. One
who had not seen this change, cannot under-
stand why the mystic calls his physical body, a
‘“shadow.’’
Here are two violently contradictory opinions of
H.P.B.—both of them from the pen of Col. Olcott. It
376 THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
is certain that H.P.B. had not changed from 1891 to
1895; what caused the change in Col. Oleott, and which
of his opposed utterances is the more nearly accurate,
the more expressive of the highest and best in him?
The one view is the view expressed by the Master Him-
self in the letter written Col. Olcott in the early fall of
1888, the view consistently held by Mr. Judge, and con-
sistently supported by the best evidence of all—the evi-
dence furnished by the life and teachings of H. P. Bla-
vatsky. The other view is the view of the S.P.R., of
Mrs. Cables, of Mr. Hume, of Prof. Coues, of Miss Mabel
Collins, of Mr. A. P. Sinnett. Colonel Olcott, like many
another, had every opportunity to know the ‘‘real
H.P.B.,’’ and the world and the students took it for
eranted that he did know.
It is curious, and at this point of related value, to
turn to two quotations from ‘‘Old Diary Leaves.’’ They
may afford the intuitional student a hint on some of
the mysteries and methods of true Occultism, and serve
at the same time to show how little able Col. Olcott
was to avail himself of the rare opportunities his serv-
ices brought him. Chapter XVI of the first volume of
‘‘Old Diary Leaves’’ discusses the mystery of H.P.B.
and, amidst a mass of Col. Olcott’s speculations inter-
spersed with the alleged facts recited, makes certain
highly significant statements. But first it should be
noted that Chapter XIV propounds seven distinct hy-
potheses to try to ‘‘explain’’ H.P.B., and it and the
following chapter are devoted to trying to make the
facts fit one or another of these theories of the Colo-
nel’s. The mere fact that he submits seven theories
should show anyone that however fertile Col. Olcott’s
imagination in trying to resolve the mystery, it was a
mystery, and one he was unable to solve. Finally, in
Chapter XVI he gives the two incidents spoken of. He
says that one summer evening just after dinner in New
York days and while it was still early twilight, he was
standing by the mantel while H.P.B. sat by one of the
front windows. Then:
“OLD DIARY LEAVES” 377
I heard her say ‘‘Look and learn’’; and
glancing that way, saw a mist rising from her
head and shoulders. Presently it defined itself
into the likeness of one of the Mahatmas....
Absorbed in watching the phenomenon, I stood
silent and motionless. The shadowy shape only
formed for itself the upper half of the torso, and
then faded away and was gone; whether re-ab-
sorbed into H.P.B.’s body or not, I do not
know. . . . When J asked her to explain the phe-
nomenon she refused, saying that it was for me
to develop my intuition so as to understand the
phenomena of the world I lived in. All she could
do was to help in showing me things and let me
make of them what I could.
This incident is recited by Col. Olcott to suggest ‘‘that
H.P.B.’s body became, at times, occupied by other enti-
ties.’’ It seems not to have occurred to him at all that
perhaps he was being afforded a glimpse of the ‘‘real
H.P.B.,’’ nor was he, who asked her for an explanation,
able to relate the experience with which he was favored
to the true rationale of its exhibition, given in the twelfth
chapter of the second volume of ‘‘Isis Unveiled’’ in
one of the numbered paragraphs. All he saw was a very
wonderful phenomenon, and all he was able to make of
it was a new speculation. So absolutely engrossed was
he at all times in gratifying his thirst for phenomena
and in speculations on their nature that he never had
time or inclination to try to see if her explanations of
their nature and rationale might not afford the very
solution he was so desirous of gaining.
In Chapter XVII, he follows with an incident of a year
or two later and sees no connection! He is telling of
some of the communications he received from the Mas-
ters. He says:
One quite long letter that I received in 1879
[from one of the Masters], most strangely alters
378 THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
her sex, speaks of her im the male gender, and
confounds her with the Mahatma “‘M’”’... It
says—about a first draft of the letter itself which
had been written but not sent me: ‘‘Owing to
certain expressions therein, the letter was
stopped on its way by order of our Brother
H.P.B. Ag you are not under my direct guid-
ance but his (hers), we have naught to say,
either of us’’; etc. And again: ‘‘Our Brother
H.P.B. rightly remarked .. .’’ ete.
One may compare the foregoing with the remark of
the Master ‘‘K. H.’’ in his letter of 1888 to Col. Olcott:
‘‘The personality known as H.P.B. to the world (but
otherwise to us).’’
Still another most interesting sidelight on the ‘‘mys-
tery of H.P.B.’’ and of Occultism in general, may be
found in Lucifer for October 15, 1888 (the month of the
public announcement of the Esoteric Section). There
a correspondent makes some ‘‘Pertinent Queries’’ in re-
gard to statements in Mr. Sinnett’s ‘‘Eisoteric Budd-
hism.’’ In the ‘‘Editor’s Answer’’ to these pertinent
queries H.P.B. takes occasion to make some remarks
regarding the Masters. She says (italics ours) :
... among the group of Initiates to which
his [Mr. Sinnett’s] own mystical correspondent
[‘‘K. H.’’] is allied, are two of European race,
and that one who is that Teacher’s superior
[the Master ‘‘M’’] zs also of that origin, being
half a Slavonian in his ‘‘present incarnation,”’
as he himself wrote to Colonel Olcott in New
York.
Just why H.P.B. should put the phrase ‘‘present
incarnation’’ in quotes is worth some intuitional effort,
as is also the fact that ‘‘H. P. B.’’ was herself precisely
and exactly ‘‘half a Slavonian’’ in her then ‘‘ present
incarnation.’’
One word more: Col. Olcott’s ‘‘faith’’ in H.P.B., in
Masters, in Theosophy, rested upon exactly the same
“OLD DIARY LEAVES” 379
basis as his ‘‘faith’’ in Spiritualism during the preced-
ing twenty years. That basis was phenomena—not
philosophy, logic, ethics, altruism. ‘‘Old Diary Leaves”’
shows this on nearly every page. His memorial article
above quoted from so states specifically. When this is
recognized his vagaries can be understood, his failures
overlooked, his misjudgments forgiven, his misconcep-
tions allowed for, and the solid value of his services to
the Society and to Buddhism given generous tribute.
CHAPTER XXIV
CONTROVERSY OVER H.P.B.’S STATUS AS AGENT OF THE
MASTERS
By the spring of 1893 the internal situation of the
Society was fast approaching a climax paralleling that
of 1888, and, as in the earlier case, it occurred con-
temporaneously with a flood-tide of external interest
and prosperity. ‘‘Old Diary Leaves’’ was steadily un-
dermining the reverence and respect of the members for
H.P.B. as a Teacher, by representing her as a mere
thaumaturgist. The theories and speculations to account
for her phenomena, the vagaries of character and habits
attributed to her, could only lead to the inference that,
however gifted in some ways, she was but an irresponsi-
ble medium, not a Messenger direct from the great
Lodge of Masters. This constant stream of belittle-
ment by the President-Founder of the Society who was
generally considered as her most intimate friend and
associate was not less injurious to her Occult status than
that of the Psychical Research Society in its celebrated
Report. The Letter of the Masrnr, ‘‘K. H.,’’? phenome-
nally delivered to Col. Olcott on shipboard in the early
autumn of 1888, at a time when he was harboring and ex-
pressing the same feelings and views, was forgotten or
lost sight of, and H.P.B. was more and more coming to be
regarded by many members as at best an uncertain chan-
nel between the Masters and the world; a channel to
be utilized under reserve, if not to be scrutinized with
actual doubt and suspicion. Now that she was dead, even
that questionable link was severed and the members,
left to themselves, were peculiarly open to suggestion
and direction. To whom should they look if not to the
President-Founder? And when they were offered his
views, clothed with official authority, expressed with
380
CONTROVERSY OVER H.P.B. 381
the utmost candor, sincerity and good faith, what more
natural than the deductions that the Society was of far
more importance than a Philosophy derived through a
questionable source; phenomena more valuable than
study; propaganda more necessary than altruism?
What more natural than the inference that the living
President-Founder was now, and always had been, the
real mainstay of the Movement and of the Society?
What was Mr. Judge to do in these circumstances?
If he held his peace, the Society and the membership
were certain to be irremediably led astray from the
prime Objects proclaimed insistently by the Masrsrs,
by H.P.B. and himself. Should he permit the lines of
Teaching, of policy and of practice laid down by H.P.B.
to be swept aside and himself join in building up a great
organization with purely utilitarian and exoteric aims?
Or should he do as she had done in 1888—hold to the
‘‘lines laid down’’ regardless of all else that might be-
fall? For now, even more than in 1888, the whole ten-
dency in the Society was to achieve a great public suc-
cess, while in the Esoteric School an increasing per-
centage of the members were avid to convert it into a
‘hall of Occultism,’’ and were pursuing the ‘‘Third Ob-
ject’’ to the exclusion of all else. Was H.P.B. to become
a mere memory, the Mastrers an empty and far-off inac-
cessible abstraction, T'HEosopHy secondary to the The-
osophical Society, and that Theosophy to be twisted, per-
verted, corrupted, by the interpretations of students, the
‘‘fresh revelations’’ of the horde of psychics and ‘‘oc-
cultists’? who were already proclaiming their ‘‘succes-
sorship’’ to H.P.B. and delivering ‘‘messages from
the Masters of H.P.B.’’ in contradiction to what she
had taught and exemplified?
The great issues at stake must have given him pause,
and he must have realized that in entering the lists in
defense of the Teachings and Mission of H.P.B. he
was inviting a far more unequal combat than any she
had ever brought upon her devoted head. For H.P.B.
had had the prestige of a pioneer, the philosophy she
had recorded was her standing witness; her phenomena,
382 THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
however misrepresented, were none the less irrevocably
attested by the very ones who now sought to usurp her
robes; and she had had at all times devoted defenders—
Judge foremost of all. But Mr. Judge was now alone;
he had been purposely kept in obscurity during the first
ten-year cycle of the Society’s life; he was little known
to the membership at large outside the United States;
he was without literary or oratorical or official reputa-
tion; he had at all times sustained and defended the
President-Founder as strongly in his place as he had
H.P.B. in hers. He was of necessity a thorn in the
side of all those who sought to profit the Society and
themselves by ignoring or minimizing the unique status
of H.P.B.—who were equally ready to treat her as an
asset or a liability, as might best serve their purposes.
What was Mr. Judge to do?
Under date of March, 1898, he issued to the Amer-
ican members of the ES. a circular entitled ‘‘We Have
Not Been Deserted.’’ He wrote:
It is very proper to answer the question
which has come to many, expressed or unex-
pressed, whether since the death of H.P.B.’s
body the E.S.T. has been in communication with
the Masters who ordered her to start the
Litre bal beer? bay
We have not been deserted at all, and the
Masters have all along been watching and aid-
ing. They have communicated with several of
those who by nature are fit; those who have
made themselves fit; and with those who are,
by peculiar Karma, in the line of such com-
munication. None of these messages go by fa-
vor or by the desire of some to have them. . .
There are in the School certain persons known
to me who have been in communication with the
Masters for some time, but they do not know
each other, and have never by word or sign given
out the fact. ... In America the line of com-
munication is not ruptured. It is true that it is
CONTROVERSY OVER H.P.B.
not as strong as it was when H.P.B. was here,
but we cannot expect always to have the same
amount of force working, for there is a law,
based on cycles, which requires such line of
force to be stopped or weakened now and then.
The stoppage however is never total, but at cer-
tain periods it is confined to the few. We have
the misfortune to know that at one time many of
the Masters were publicly at’ work here in our
early years and that the opportunity for us was
missed by reason of the materialistic and natu-
ralistic tendencies of the day and of our edu-
cation. Our missing it did not, however, prevent
the doing by those personages of the work in
hand. A more narrow confinement of these lines
of action and communication will come at a later
day, strictly in accord with the laws I have re-
ferred to. But we have only to do our duty and
to work for the future so as to be able to return
to the work at a better time in some other life.
Within the last nine months some communica-
tions have been received from the Masters
bearing on the general work, for they have
ceased (as by rule) to deal much in personal
concerns, but They do not fail to help in the
real and right way the efforts of all members
who sincerely work for others. Those who are
at work for their own benefit will meet with the
exact result of such a line of action, that is, they
will not go far and will lose much at death
which is sure to come to us all. But unselfish
work makes the effect sink down into each one’s
own nature and therefore preserves it all.
Furthermore, some years ago the Masters said
that in the course of time I should see that cer-
tain facts had to come out. Some of these I
now give, and shall give them in The Path pub-
licly. First, the Masters both certified in writ-
ing, about 1884, that the Secret Doctrine was
dictated by them to H. P. B., she only using
374
For contrast one has but to turn to the Henry S. Ol-
eott of the summer of 1891, immediately after the death
of H.P.B. Lucifer for August 15 of that year con-
tains a long memorial article by Col. Olcott, entitled
THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
and about the beginnings of the Society—truth
which nobody can gainsay. . . . I have pursued
my present task to its completion, despite the
fact that some of my most influential colleagues
have, from what I consider mistaken loyalty
to ‘‘H.P.B.,’’ secretly tried to destroy my influ-
ence, ruin my reputation, reduce the circulation
of my magazine, and prevent the publication of
my book....
.. . Karma forbid that I should do her a
featherweight of injustice, but if there ever ex-
isted a person in history who was a greater con-
glomeration of good and bad, light and shadow,
wisdom and indiscretion, spiritual insight and
lack of common sense, I cannot recall the name,
the circumstances or the epoch.
‘CH.P.B.’s Departure.’’ We quote:
... There is no one to replace Helena Pe-
trovna, nor can she ever be forgotten. Others
have certain of her gifts, none has them all.
... Her life, as I have known it these past
seventeen years, as friend, colleague and col-
laborator, has been a tragedy, the tragedy of a
martyr-philanthropist. Burning with zeal for
the spiritual welfare and intellectual enfran-
chisement of humanity, moved by no selfish in-
spiration, giving herself freely and without price
to her altruistic work, she has been hounded to
her death-day, by the slanderer, the bigot and
the Pharisee. . . . In temperament and abilities
as dissimilar as any two persons could well be,
and often disagreeing radically in details, we
have yet been of one mind and heart as regards
the work in hand and in our reverent allegiance
“OLD DIARY LEAVES” 375
to our Teachers and Masters, its planners and
overlookers. We both knew them personally,
she a hundred times more intimately than I.
. . . She was pre-eminently a double-selfed per-
sonality, one of them very antipathetic to me
and some others. ... One seeing us together
would have said I had her fullest confidence, yet
the fact is that, despite seventeen years of in-
timacy in daily work, she was an enigma to me
to the end. Often I would think I knew her per-
fectly, and presently discover that there were
deeper depths in her selfhood I had not sounded.
I could never find out who she was, not as Helena
Petrovna, ..... but as ‘SH.P:B;,’”) the mysteri-
ous individuality which wrote, and worked
wonders. ...
We had each our department of work—hers
the mystical, mine the practical. In her line,
she infinitely excelled me and every other of her
colleagues. I have no claim at all to the title
of metaphysician, nor to anything save a block
of very humble knowledge. ...
.. . She knew the bitterness and gloom of
physical life well enough, often saying to me that
her true existence only began when nightly she
had put her body to sleep and went out of it to
the Masters. I can believe that, from often
sitting and watching her from across the table,
when she was away from the body, and then
when she returned from her soul-flight and re-
sumed occupancy, as one might call it. When
she was away the body was like a darkened
house, when she was there it was as though the
windows were brilliant with lights within. One
who had not seen this change, cannot under-
stand why the mystic calls his physical body, a
‘“shadow.”’
Here are two violently contradictory opinions of
H.P.B.—both of them from the pen of Col. Olcott. It
386 THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
‘‘Tf this can be of any help to
though I doubt it, I, the humble undersigned
Faquir, certify that the Secret Doctrine 1s
dictated to (name of H.P.B.), partly by. my-
self and partly by my brother ————_.
A year after this certain doubts having arisen
in the minds of individuals, another letter from
one of the signers of the foregoing was sent and
reads as follows. As the prophecy in it has come
true, it is now the time to publish it for the
benefit of those who know something of how to
take and understand such letters. For the out-
side it will all be so much nonsense.
‘ In the other case Mrs. Besant was re-
ferring to an article on ‘‘Gurus and Chelas,’’ in which
Mr. Sturdy expressed very emphatically his views on the
subject. Mr. Sturdy’s article was manifestly inspired
indirectly by the numerous claims and counter-claims of
‘“chelaship’’ and ‘‘messages from the Masters’? made by
or on behalf of various members. Directly, it was, we
think, undoubtedly occasioned by a brief article with the
same title, and bearing the signature, ‘‘A Hindu Chela,’’
published in Lucifer for May preceding. Whatever the
source or origin of the article by the ‘‘Hindu Chela,’’
it is strictly true to the principles and conduct of the
Second Section, so far as those have ever been disclosed.
In publishing Mr. Sturdy’s article Mrs. Besant did not
state that she had suppressed its three closing para-
eraphs, in which Mr. Sturdy discloses his real animus
in writing. Mr. Sturdy was a close follower of Col.
Olcott and a great admirer of Mr. Sinnett and Mrs.
®*See preceding chapter.
418 THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
Besant. It was well understood that his suppressed
statements actually were aimed at Mr. Judge, and while
Mrs. Besant had already begun to listen to hints and in-
nuendoes against the good faith of Mr. Judge, she was
still publicly supporting him and his policies as the poli-
cies of H.P.B. The student will do well to read, re-read,
and relate as closely as possible the stream of matter
in the Theosophast, Lucifer, and The Path during the
year 1893, if he is to discern the weaving of the meshes
of the web of the fatal plot of 1894. We can but barely
indicate some of the most significant of the knots that
were being tied. First, then, let us turn to The The-
osopmst for October, 1893, in which Mr. Sturdy’s article
is reproduced in full, with an editorial note by Col. Ol-
eott as editor of The Theosopst. Colonel Olcott’s note
reads:
The three paragraphs within brackets hav-
ing been expurgated by the editors of Lucifer
for reasons of their own, and Mr. Sturdy re-
garding them as the pith of his argument, we
print the whole article by his request and com-
mend it to the attention of the reader.—Ep.
Theos.
Mr. Sturdy’s expurgated paragraphs read as follows:
Of conerete things and persons we need con-
crete proofs. Of concrete letters and messages
from living men, we need concrete evidence; not
metaphysical or mere argumentative proof. Yet
you can never disprove these claims. If I choose
to send a letter in green, blue, or red or any
other coloured ink or pencil and tell you I re-
ceived it from a Mahatma for you, or merely say
nothing and enclose it in a letter to you, you
may be very much astonished, but you can prove
no he or forgery against me. If you are wise
you will act as if you had never received it;
unless indeed you make a mental note or two
against me; one of folly for my having done
ANNIE BESANT IN AMERICA 419
such a thing and given no proofs, and another
of watchfulness as to my character generally.
Nor does it seem probable that the Mahatmas,
who, as we know, teach no dogmas, but always
act by the amount of understanding an indi-
vidual has, would encourage a system of mere
statement and claim without accompanying
proof ; for this would be to lay the seeds in men’s
hearts of a faith in the statements of other
men quite outside their experience and quite un-
supported, men whose hearts they had not
fathomed. This would lead back to all the evils
of the past, not forward into light and knowl-
edge.
All such is glamour: there is no false mystery
in chelaship; all nonsense about ‘‘developing in-
tuition’’ is merely making excuses for what
cannot be proven and is about the same in the
end as the Christian ‘‘faith.’’ Let a man go on
his path acting sternly by what he knows, not
by what he is asked or persuaded to believe. Let
him act by no directions which may be merely
the thoughts of others no wiser than himself.
How does he know? He does not know. Then
let him be quite clear and straightforward in
this, that he does not know.
In Lucifer for October, 1893, Mrs. Besant wrote over
her signature an article in reference to ‘‘Gurus and
Chelas’’ and took a strong stand against the spirit and
logic of Mr. Sturdy’s article. A brief quotation will dis-
close her position on what she calls the ‘‘fundamental
difference’’ between Mr. Sturdy’s views and her own:
Is the most sacred and sublime of all human
relationships nothing more than an intellectual
bond, entered into with questions that appear to
make the initial stage one of mutual suspicion,
to be slowly removed by prolonged knowledge of
each other in physical life? Not so have I been
420 THE THEROSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
taught, little as I know of these high matters,
and the process described by Bro. Sturdy is the
complete reversal of all that I have heard as to
the methods of the school to which I was intro-
duced by H.P.B.
Mr. Sturdy, it will be remembered, was himself not
only a member of the Esoteric School but also had been
one of the ‘‘H.8.T. Council’’ appointed by H.P.B., and
had been present at the meeting at 19 Avenue Road
on May 27, 1891, when the E.S. was reorganized im-
mediately after the death of H.P.B.6 To understand
the breach indicated by the ‘‘Gurus and Chelas’’ ar-
ticles, these must be related not only to the matters we
have been discussing, but in particular to an existing
situation and a series of events which were due to it,
which we have so far but barely hinted at, so that stu-
dents might more readily grasp the connection when it
required consideration. Let us first treat of the events
themselves, and then go into the situation which gave
rise to them.
We have earlier mentioned that at the meeting of the
K..S. Council on May 27, 1891, all that transpired, with
one exception,’ was covered in the circular of the same
date sent to all members of the Esoteric School. That
omitted matter was a message from one of the Masters
received during the deliberations, and by Mrs. Besant
read to those present. We shall recur to this subject
again, so that it is sufficient here to speak of the fact.
This meeting was under the pledge of secrecy, as was
the circular sent to the E.S. members. Immediately
following this, and while Mr. Judge was still in England,
following H.P.B.’s death, The Path for August, 1891,
edited during Mr. Judge’s absence by ‘‘ Jasper Niemand’’
(Mrs. Archibald Keightley, or Julia Campbell-Ver
Planck, as her name was then), began with a powerful
article on ‘‘A Theosophical Education.’’ This article
was headed with a message from one of the Masters,
*See Chapter XIX.
"See Chapter XIX.
ANNIE BESANT IN AMERICA 421
and was signed by Jasper Niemand. It should be re-
membered that at that time no one knew who Jasper
Niemand was except Mr. Judge and Mrs. Ver Planck her-
self. The article went on to say that the ‘‘message’’
had been. received by a ‘‘student theosophist’’ since
H.P.B.’s death, that the message was from H.P.B.’s
Master and was ‘‘attested by His real signature and
seal.’’ We have italicized the word ‘‘real’’ because we
shall later have to return to the subject.®
Following this, on August 30, 1891, Mrs. Besant, in
St. James’ Hall, London, made a farewell address to the
Secularists with whom she had worked for so many years
prior to her becoming a Theosophist. The great hall
was packed with her old co-workers. Her lengthy ad-
dress was entitled ‘‘1875-1891: a Fragment of Auto-
biography.’’ Near the close of this address she pledged
her word, her senses, her sanity, and her honor that
‘“since Madame Blavatsky left, I have had letters in the
same writing and from the same person,’’ t.e., from the
‘‘Mahatma’’ from whom the ‘‘messages’’ transmitted by
H.P.B. during her lifetime had been believed by The-
osophists to emanate.
Naturally, these two public proclamations, the
anonymous one in The Path, the other the solemn per-
sonal affirmation of Mrs. Besant, both of them direct,
sweeping, and unqualified, aroused a furore in the world
and particularly amongst Theosophists. Because of Mrs.
Besant’s statement it was inevitably inferred that she
herself was in ‘‘communication with the Masters’’ and
this inference was strengthened by her subsequent state-
ments to various newspaper interviewers, and by other
direct statements similar to the one in Lucifer for August,
1893, from which we have quoted in the present chapter.
No one, reading Mrs. Besant’s various statements dur-
ing the three years following H.P.B.’s death, and grant-
ing her sanity and honesty, could do other than infer
that she spoke from direct, immediate personal knowl-
edge and experience of her own, and not from hearsay,
inference, or dependence on any one else’s assumed pow-
*See Chapter XXXIV.
422 THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
ers and knowledge. These affirmations, coupled with her
great reputation and towering place in the Theosophical
world, caused numbers of Theosophists throughout the
world to look to her, her writings, and her example, as the
sure guide to follow. In the Esoteric School the mem-
bers considered her as little, if any, short of H.P.B.’s
stature in the Occult world, and this was particularly
the case in England, Europe, and Asia. Her influence,
therefore, with the membership both of the Society at
large and of the Esoteric School grew to be tremendous
and surpassed that of any other living person, while in
the world she was the propagandist who could command
the most attention, the largest audiences, the greatest
publicity in the press. Judge, declining the Presidency
by securing the revocation of Olcott’s resignation, writ-
ing in his magazine largely under pseudonyms, confin-
ing his official activities to the routine of a ‘‘General
Secretary’’ of a Section, at all times avoided publicity to
the utmost possible extent. He was unceasing in his de-
votion to the work of the School, to the promotion of the
First Object, and to the dissemination of Theosophy.
Such publicity as befell him was due rather to the out-
spoken praise of Mrs. Besant and others, and to the at-
tacks upon him, direct and indirect, for his vigilant ef-
forts to keep the name, the fame, and the writings of
H.P.B. alive before the membership as their example
and their guide, than to any necessity of his work or of-
ficial position, which was at all times purely nominal,
as had been the case with H.P.B. herself. And the
student may be interested to know that from the year
following the death of H.P.B. till his own passing in
1896, his was a sick and over-burdened body, as was
H.P.B.’s after the fiery furnace of 1884-5. In fact, during
the years 1893-5, Mr. Judge was in such condition that he
was for the most of the time able to speak but in whis-
pers, and much of his work was done either in bed, or
while traveling in search of physical relief.
Mrs. Besant’s fame and reputation for ‘‘Occultism,”’
her continuous lectures, her vast and unceasing emission
of writings, her capacity for continuous work under un-
ANNIE BESANT IN AMERICA 423
ending pressures, her confident surety of opinion and
conviction in all things, made her every day more and
more the ‘‘leader’’ of the Society. She overshadowed
Col. Oleott and Mr. Sinnett as she overshadowed Mr.
Judge—with this difference: she was convinced that Mr.
Judge had been the real colleague of H.P.B., and that
the others were not only ‘‘lesser lights’? in an Occult
sense than Mr. Judge, but that they had not been, and
were not, true to Masters and H.P.B. as Mr. Judge was.
Her support it was, chiefly, her looking to Judge for
counsel and advice, that gave him standing with the gen-
eral membership outside America.
Colonel Olcott and Mr. Sinnett, both exceedingly
tenacious of whatever opinions they held, both greatly
enjoying the prestige which they had acquired, the one
as President-Founder, and the other as the President of
the London Lodge and writer of the most popular trea-
tises on Theosophy, could but be affected by the rise
of Mrs. Besant into the luminous zone of the Theosophi-
cal firmament. Neither of them had been pleased, either
with H.P.B. and her ‘‘interferences,’’ or with her par-
tiality—as it must have seemed to them—toward the
obscure and unpretentious young man upon whom The-
osophy and the Society perforce had to depend in Amer-
ica. With the passing of H.P.B. it could but have
seemed the natural and the appropriate thing for them
to step, with proper expressions of regret and apprecia-
tion, into the place made vacant by the death of ‘‘the
old lion of the Punjab.’’ But when Mr. Judge kept on
speaking and writing of H.P.B. as though she were still
living and still the surpassing factor of the Movement,
her writings the criterion by which to weigh and act, it
was too much! Were they never to receive that recog-
nition which was rightly theirs? With Mr. Judge out of
the way H.P.B. had been easier to deal with while she
was alive; with Judge out of the way, it would be easy
to deal with H.P.B. dead. But when Mr. Judge found in
Mrs. Besant a supporter and defender, both of H.P.B.
and himself, and their brief triumph seemed threat-
ened, without a chance of viability, it was much too much!
424 THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
Hence the issues of ‘‘hero worship,’’ of ‘‘dogmatism,’’
of the ‘‘neutrality of the T.S.’’; hence ‘‘Old Diary
Leaves’’; hence the revived activities of the London
Lodge with its ‘‘Transactions’’; hence the swift coming
to the surface of disharmony, disunion, charges and
counter-charges, claims and counter-claims.
CHAPTER XXVI
BEGINNINGS OF THE ‘‘JUDGE CASE’’
WHEN the ‘‘ Message’”’ in the August, 1891, Path came
to Col. Olcott’s attention he wrote Mr. Judge. Then
ensued a long private correspondence between the two,
Judge doing his best to mollify the President-Founder
while yet holding the position of uncompromising loy-
alty to H.P.B. and her Mission, and to the policies
he was pursuing; Col. Olcott, determined to bring mat-
ters to an issue once and for all and enforce his own
authority and standing as the ‘‘Official Head’’ of the
Society. Colonel Olcott’s strategy and tactics were griev-
ously interfered with and upset for the time being by
Mrs. Besant’s charges against his moral character which
caused him to ‘‘flee from the field of battle’’ by resign-
ing under fire. When Mr. Judge came to his support
and rescue, the better nature of Col. Olcott was once
more in the saddle, and his public and official, as well
as his private and personal, acts and statements became
once more for a brief period those of the earlier years
of his probation. But when it was whispered in his ear
that it was Mr. Judge himself who had concocted the
charges against him, with the purpose to unseat him in
the love and veneration of the membership, and that Mr.
Judge had come to his aid only through fear of being
unmasked, Col. Olcott, old, sick, and disheartened, threw
off his faint-heartedness, once more girded on his armor
and weapons and re-entered the lists for a combat a
l’outrance—‘‘for the sake of the Masters and the So-
ciety,’’ as he verily believed. It seems never to have
occurred to him to write Mr. Judge his fears and sus-
picions direct and ask the facts; it seems never to have
occurred to him to investigate or verify in any way the
suspicions breathed to him. His vanity pricked, his
425
426 THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
jealousies aroused, his own sincerity and devotion
mocked, as it must have seemed to him, he took his fears
for facts, his suspicions for certainties, and was thence-
forth as sure of the ‘‘ingratitude”’ and the ‘‘disloyalty’’
of Mr. Judge as before he had been of H.P.B.’s. His
fiery courage, his impetuous nature, all his noble and
strong qualities were thenceforth blindly at the service
of the masked and hidden enemies of the Theosophical
Movement.
While Mrs. Besant was on her third visit to America
in the winter of 1892-3, Mr. Judge showed her the cor-
respondence with Col. Olcott. One of the letters of Mr.
Judge was on questions raised by Col. Olcott on the
‘message’? in The Path of August, 1891.1. Mrs. Besant
asked and obtained from Mr. Judge consent to the publi-
cation of this letter in her magazine Lucifer, where it
appeared in April, 1893, immediately after her return
from the United States. This letter was, according to
the restriction imposed by Mr. Judge, not published as
to Col. Olcott, but as to ‘‘An Indian Brother,’’ and was
given by Mrs. Besant the caption, ‘‘An Interesting
Letter.’’
So soon as Lucifer with the ‘‘interesting letter’’
reached India, Col. Olcott took action. In The The-
osophist for July, 1893, appear two articles in criticism
of the views expressed by Mr. Judge in the ‘‘interesting
letter.’? The second of these, signed ‘‘N. D. K.’’ (the
initials of N. D. Khandalavala, a prominent Indian mem:
ber), is an argument, from a similar point of view to
that of Mr. Sturdy in ‘‘Gurus and Chelas,’’ against the
danger of mere substitution by the unwise of ‘‘ Masters’’
for a personal ‘‘Savior.’’ ‘‘Reliance on Masters as
ideals and as facts’? seems to N. D. K. mere folly.
N. D. K. says:
Does not the Christian missionary come cant-
ing after us with exactly the same words? Sub-
stitute the words ‘‘Jesus and Saviour’’ for
‘‘Masters’’ in the sentences of Mr. Judge, and
*See Chapter XX.
BEGINNINGS OF THE “JUDGE CASE” 427
they will read like a propaganda of the Kvan-
gelist preachers.
N. D. K. objects very strongly to Mr. Judge’s saying
that he ‘‘knows out of his own experience’’ of the ex-
istence of Masters and suggests that Mr. Judge ‘‘sys-
tematically and exhaustively bring forward his experi-
ences for the benefit of us all. ... There is no virtue
whatsoever in boldly making an assertion, and withhold-
ing the evidence upon which the assertion has been
based.’’? Most objectionable of all to N. D. K. is Mr.
Judge’s statement that his means of identifying a ‘‘mes-
sage’’ is ‘within himself,’’ and not by means of external
evidences such as signatures, seal, etc. This, N. D. K.
thinks, is very bad indeed. He quotes from H.P.B. on
the great need for ‘‘unbiassed and clear judgment’’ in all
matters, but apparently has never read H.P.B.’s article
in Lucifer for September, 1888, on ‘‘ Lodges of Magic’? in
which she discusses this very question of the evidences of
messages from the same standpoint as Mr. Judge’s state-
ments, in reply to those who were whispering about that
some of her Messages were fraudulent, others genuine,
etc. N. D. K.’s implications would all apply equally to
H.P.B. as to Mr. Judge, and, as the student may dis-
cern for himself by comparison of statements, all that
Mr. Judge wrote in his ‘‘interesting letter’’ had before
him been said by H.P.B., to the same annoyance of the
‘doubting Thomases’’ who, themselves unable to ‘‘com-
municate,’’ nevertheless wanted ‘‘proofs’’ satisfactory to
themselves. N. D. K.’s article has for title and subtitle,
‘‘THEOSOPHY IN THE West. T'HE TenpENcY ‘Towarps
DogMatTIsM.”’
The other article in The Theosophist had for title,
‘‘Theosophic Freethought’’ and is signed by Messrs.
Walter R. Old and Sidney V. Edge, Col. Oleott’s two
chief lieutenants at the time. Mr. Old, like Mr. Sturdy,
had been a member of the ‘‘H.8.T. Council’? during
H.P.B.’s lifetime and had been present at the Avenue
Road meeting of May 27, 1891. ‘‘Theosophic Free-
thought’’ must have been written and published with the
428 THE THEOSOPHICAL MOVEMENT
full endorsement of Col. Olcott. The writers profess to
regard Mr. Judge’s statements as ‘‘virtually ...a
dogma’’ and the publication of his letter as in itself a
‘leading to dogmatism.’’ They go on to say:
Hence we cannot conclude otherwise than that
a personal declaration of belief coming from
Mr. Judge and unsupported by any evidence
showing how, in the face of general experience,
he has attained that belief, is extremely inimical
to the spirit of our Society. ...
Another dangerous dogma advanced by Mr.
Judge is the statement that ‘‘a very truism,
when uttered by a Mahatma, has a deeper mean-
ing for which the student must seek, but which he
will lose if he stops to criticize and weigh the
words in mere ordinary scales.’’ . . . if we push
it to its ultimate issue, as Mr. Judge seems
anxious to do, its thoroughly noxious and un-
wholesome nature becomes simply overpow-
Cringe yw.
Of the same nature as the above, and of
equally dangerous tendency, is the statement in
regard to messages received from a Master that
‘ aphneee J ee