^fWS ws ^ PRINCETON, N. J. No. Case, Ci^k^ ' a/^ Bampton lectures The religious necessity of the Reformation as- serted, and the extent to which it was carried in the Church of England vindicated. IN EIGHT SERMONS PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, IN THE YEAR MDCCCXXVIII. AT THE LECTURE FOUNDED BY THE LATE REV. JOHN BAMPTON, M. A. t_ ,?> a j^i CA^'ON OF SALISBURY. / =P^ '^ THOMAS ^ORNE, B.D. RECTOR OF ST. KATHARINE COLEMAN, AND FORMERLY STUDENT OF CHRIST CHURCH. OXFORD, AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS FOR THE AUTHOR. SOLD BY J. PARKER; AND BY C. AND J. RIVINGTON, LONDON. MDCCCXXVIII. PREFACE. In committing the following Discourses to the press, according to the terms of his engagement, the Author is chiefly anxious, whatever judgment may be passed upon the result of his labours, that the motives which have influenced him in the choice of his subject may not be misinterpreted. It may be reckoned among the greatest advantages derived from the institution of the Bampton Lectureship, that many of the most interesting questions in Christian theology have been accurately discussed, and the peculiar excellencies of Chris- tianity itself successfully illustrated by the different preachers on whom the office has devolved. At the same time it is obvi- ous, notwithstanding the ample range and a3 vi PREFACE. inexhaustible fertility of the subject-matter of their disquisitions, that the selection of an argument combining novelty with uti- lity, and in which he has not partially at least been anticipated by some one of his predecessors, is rendered proportionally more difficult to each succeeding Lecturer. In choosing, however, a controversial topic of strong present interest in prefer- ence to others of intrinsic and lasting im- portance, of which he is sensible that many still remain unexplored as well as consist- ent with the design of the Founder, the Author has been animated by no gratuitous love of polemical discussions, by no uncha- ritable spirit, or uncandid prejudice against adversaries of any description. He trusts that the manner in which he has expressed himself on every occasion will sufficiently guard him against such an imputation ; though he would not seek the praise of li- PREFACE. vii berality at the expense of truth, nor ex- pose his sincerity to suspicion, by apparent indifference concerning any thing of essen- tial moment. But the insidious hostility with which the Church of England has now for a se- ries of years been assailed by the agents and apologists of that of Rome, and the increasing confidence with which the long dormant spiritual pretensions of the latter have been again put forth, as her worldly prospects have seemed to brighten, are the reasons which have induced him to think that he could not render a more useful service, with his limited powers, to the cause of true religion, than by recalling at- tention to the almost forgotten heads of dispute between them and ourselves, which it is once more become necessary for every sincere and well-informed member of our church to study and understand. He is a 4 Vlll PREFACE. sensible indeed that the subject which he has thus been led to adopt is of too large dimensions for the limits within which the preacher of this Lecture is confined, and such in its nature as would require the hand of a much abler and more experi- enced controversialist to do it justice. He hopes, however, that in treating it according to his own imperfect conception, and the necessarily restricted view which want of space has constrained him to take of it, he has fallen into no material error ; conscious as he is that the elucidation of truth, exclusive of any private inducement or party feeling, has been his only object, either in arguing against the corruptions and misrepresentations of Romanists, which it has been his main purpose to refute, or the prejudices of Protestant Dissenters, to which he has more briefly adverted in his concluding Discourse. PREFACE. ix In fine, as it would ever be his most cherished wish to serve the cause of that church, to which he is still less attached by professional obligations than by the most sincere conviction of her superior excellence both in the soundness of her doctrine and the spirituality of her wor- ship, above every other branch of the uni- versal church of Christ, so there is no con- sequence of his own insufficiency which he would so earnestly deprecate, as that of aff'ording to any of her opponents an ap- parent advantage against her. A real one, either in her doctrine or her discipline, he is well assured that they will ever seek in vain. LECTURE I. 1 Cor. xi. 9. For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may he made manifest among you. Page 1. LECTURE II. Matthew xi. 19. — But wisdom is Justified of her children, P. 37. LECTURE III. Matthew x. 37, 38. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me: and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And he that taheth not his cross, and followeth after me, is not worthy of me. P. 73. LECTURE IV. Matthew xv. 9. But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. P. 109. LECTURE V. John iv. 24. God is a spirit; and they that worship him must wor- ship him in spirit and in truth. P. 147. xii CONTENTS. LECTURE VI. 1 Timothy ii. 5. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus. P. 185. LECTURE VII. Deut. iv. 15. Talr ye therefore good heed unto yourselves ; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the Lord spake unto you in Horeh out of the midst of the fire, P. 225. LECTURE VIII. Jeremiah vi. 16. Thus saith the Lord, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ash for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls, P. 267. EXTRACT PROM THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF THE LATE REV. JOHN BAMPTON, CANON OF SALISBURY. " I give and bequeath my Lands and " Estates to the Chancellor, Masters, and Scholars " of the University of Oxford for ever, to have " and to hold all and singular the said Lands or " Estates upon trust, and to the intents and pur- " poses hereinafter mentioned ; that is to say, I " will and appoint that the Vice-Chancellor of " the University of Oxford for the time being " shall take and receive all the rents, issues, and " profits thereof, and (after all taxes, reparations, " and necessary deductions made) that he pay all " the remainder to the endowment of eight Di- " vinity Lecture Sermons, to be established for " ever in the said University, and to be performed " in the manner following : " I direct and appoint, that, upon the first " Tuesday in Easter Term, a Lecturer be yearly xiv EXTRACT FROM " chosen by the Heads of Colleges only, and by " no others, in the room adjoining to the Print- " ing-House, between the hours of ten in the " morning and two in the afternoon, to preach " eight Divinity Lecture Sermons, the year fol- " lowing, at St. Mary's in Oxford, between the " commencement of the last month in Lent Term, " and the end of the third week in Act Term. " Also I direct and appoint, that the eight Di- " vinity Lecture Sermons shall be preached upon " either of the following subjects — to confirm and " establish the Christian Faith, and to confute all *• heretics and schismatics — upon the divine au- " thority of the holy Scriptures — upon the author- " ity of the writings of the primitive Fathers, as " to the faith and practice of the primitive Church " — upon the Divinity of our Lord and Saviour " Jesus Christ — upon the Divinity of the Holy " Ghost — upon the Articles of the Christian Faith, " as comprehended in the Apostles' and Nicene '^ Creeds. " Also I direct, that thirty copies of the eight '^ Divinity Lecture Sermons shall be always print- " ed, within two months after they are preached, *' and one copy shall be given to the Chancellor of " the University, and one copy to the Head of '' every College, and one copy to the Mayor of the CANON BAMPTON'S WILL. xv " city of Oxford, and one copy to be put into the " Bodleian Library ; and the expense of printing " them shall be paid out of the revenue of the " Land or Estates given for establishing the Di- " vinity Lecture Sermons : and the Preacher shall ^' not be paid, nor be entitled to the revenue, be- " fore they are printed. " Also I direct and appoint, that no person " shall be qualified to preach the Divinity Lecture " Sermons, unless he hath taken the degree of ^' Master of Arts at least, in one of the two Uni- " versities of Oxford or Cambridge ; and that the ^' same person shall never preach the Divinity *' Lecture Sermons twice." I 1 Cor. xi. 9. JFor there must he also heresies among you, that they which are approved may he made mani- fest among you. X HE appearances both of the natural and moral world, more especially if viewed as insulated particulars, and not as constituent portions of a great and connected whole, are sometimes such as to stagger human reason, and to contradict our preconceived notions of wise and harmonious design. In contemplating such apparent irregu- larities, the disputer of this world has re- course to fate and chance only, to account for what he does not comprehend, and is ready to question the existence of a su- preme Intelligence, because he is unable to discern the principles by which it acts. But in minds tempered and enlightened by religion faith comes to the aid of reason, and small objections, which do not admit 2 LECTURE L of an obvious solution, are not suffered to outweigh great and undeniable truths. Whatever anomaly, therefore, may seem to exist in the actual constitution of things, it must be the firm belief of every man, who acknowledges the superintending pro- vidence of God in the world, that all things are by him wisely ordered for the best ; and no less must it be an article in the creed of every true Christian, that it is the final purpose of all his dispensations to establish more firmly, and to diffuse more widely, that religion which his only-begotten Son planted in the world. Nor is this persuasion more true in the abstract, than it is practically necessary to inspire us with hope and pa- tience, while we look forward, through the turbulence and obscurity of human affairs, to that more perfect manifestation of the kingdom of God, which our faith teaches us to expect. It is the exclusive attribute of the divine Wisdom to see the end from the beginning, and to make both the vicissitudes of earthly things, and even the unruly wills and affec- tions of sinful men, when they least per- LECTURE I. S ceive or intend it, subservient to its own designs ; and as in the material creation, a clearer sky and a purer atmosphere succeed to the convulsions of the elements, so in the moral world we may see order rising out of confusion, and the religious and in- tellectual state of mankind ultimately im- proved, through the operation of causes which, in their rise and progress, seemed only to tend to the production of evil. In our present state of existence, in what- ever the agency of man is concerned, good wholly unalloyed is not to be found. Where the malignity of a corrupt will does not betray itself, the evidences of infirmity are yet abundantly visible ; error of judgment accompanies the best intentions, and the unperceived influence of passion disturbs the most prudent counsels. But by the merciful appointment of divine Providence, evils are countervailed by evils, and reme- dies spring out of moral disorders ; and, in equal contradiction to the hopes of evil men and the fears of good, all things work together for the glory of God, and the wel- fare of mankind, in ways which human B 2 4 LECTURE I. reason could not anticipate, though the ultimate effect is obvious to the most sim- ple observer. The words of the apostle in the text, though in a stricter sense applicable to the case of individual Christians, and the trial of their faith from the contagion of heresy, seem to justify us in extending these prin- ciples to the state of religion in general, and in contemplating with similar views, as partial evils tending to final good, those controversies to which Christianity has been subject in almost every age, since it was first preached upon earth to that in which we live. Heresy, in various kinds and degrees, has existed in every period of the church, has troubled its peace, has partially destroyed its union, has threatened widely to corrupt its doctrines, and undermine its faith. From such dangers the most fatal con- sequences might have been apprehended and sincere piety justly alarmed ; and yet, if we consider the actual state of religion, and compare it with that which undoubted history exhibits in former ages, we shall be LECTURE I. 5 led to conclude that discord, and even he- resy itself, have been rendered instrumental to the great design of divine Providence; that the cause of Christianity has been more effectually strengthened and pro- moted by the zealous efforts of piety and learning, which the obligation of vindicating its purity has called forth ; that truth has been illustrated by the refutation of error, and faith more deeply rooted in the minds of true believers, by the necessity of study- ing its foundations, and defending it against the objections of gainsayers. But in attributing these eventual bene- fits to heresy, contrary to its own nature and intention, it will not, I trust, be ima- gined that I mean indirectly to plead the cause of heresy itself, or to represent it, as some modern sectaries have presumed to do, as a light offence against Christian piety, to seek even the advancement of religious knowledge, or any other problematical good, by disturbing the foundations of Christian faith. My view is, merely to contemplate it in that light in which the words of the apostle seem to justify us in placing it, as B 3 6 LECTURE I. conducive to the vital efficacy of pure reli- gion, by exciting a cautious vigilance against the propagation of error, and keeping alive that zealous spirit of inquiry after truth, which is so peculiarly characteristic of Chris- tianity, and which experience seems to jus- tify us in regarding as its conservative prin- ciple, and under the influence of divine grace the most effectual antidote to the na- tural apathy of the human mind concern- ing spiritual things. Contending sects have indeed been too ready to charge each other with the guilt of heresy ; and in the heat of religious controversy, slight disagreements, concerning abstruse and purely abstract points of opinion, have been too hastily as- sumed as a sufficient foundation for the charge. From such mutual criminations the spi- rit of Christian charity should restrain us, whenever the interest of necessary truth is not concerned ; and we should be slow to cast upon others an imputation, which, if we are true Christians, we ought above all worldly reproaches to be unwilling to de- serve ; and whatever the ultimate conse- LECTURE I. 7 quence of heretical principles may be, wan- tonly to disseminate them, or in any way to sow the seeds of animosity and causeless division in the church, whether out of va- nity or a spirit of contradiction, we have the highest authority for pronouncing to be a sin of grievous impiety. I would merely assume it as the basis of my argu- ment, that the machinations of designing infidelity, as well as the crude conceits of self-sufficient folly, have been permitted to exercise the faith and provoke the zeal of Christians, for the prevention of greater evils. And as it must be our belief that nothing comes to pass, in the natural or moral creation, without the appointment or permission of its omniscient Author, it seems to follow by necessary consequence, that a state of things, which in a greater or less degree has attended upon Christianity in all the successive stages of its duration hitherto, would not have been suffered to exist, if it had not been upon the whole the most conducive to its advancement, and perfectly consistent with those good purposes, both ultimate and immediate, B 4 8 LECTURE L which that dispensation was designed to effect. Nor is there any thing in this view of the subject, which is not warranted by ex- perience and analogy, if we may be allowed in questions of religion to reason at all from temporal to spiritual things. It is well known that the progress of every art and science, and especially those which are most refined and intellectual, has been greatly as- sisted by the discussion of opposite theories, and the controversies maintained concern- ing their true principles ; and in like man- ner it is undeniably certain, that our reli- gion has derived the strongest additional confirmation, not only from the sober dis- putations of learned and pious men con- cerning its general evidences and peculiar doctrines, but even from the licentious vio- lence of its adversaries, who have left no- thing unsaid, which their depraved inge- nuity could suggest, to weaken its author- ity. The most artfully constructed system of falsehood could never have resisted such attacks as have been successively directed against every side of Christianity which, in LECTURE I. 9 the opinion of its adversaries, has appeared the weakest ; and if Christianity has not only stood unshaken against them, but its foundations have been strengthened, and its true principles more perfectly illustrated, through the vain attempts of infidels to subvert the one, and of heretics to obscure the other, we have in this very fact a ground of confidence, which cannot be too highly appreciated, and which it is evident that we never could have possessed, if the abortive attempts of its various enemies to effect its ruin had not by their signal failure provided it for us. It is indeed to the fiery trials which it has so repeatedly gone through, and which must have consumed it if it had been of a baser texture, that we are indebted for the strongest proof that it is imperishable, and that it emanated wholly from the wis- dom of God, and not the invention of man. But, indeed, the whole history of our religion proves nothing more clearly, than the truth which holy writ declares, that ^God seeth not as man seeth^ and that ^his ways are past (our) finding out. a 1 Sam. xvi. 7. ^ Rom. xi. 33. 10 LECTURE I. It is scarcely too much to assert, that al- most every circumstance, attending the pro- mulgation of the gospel, was directly the reverse of what human wisdom would have chosen for the furtherance of the same ends. And certainly it is not more foreign to our apprehension, that the arrogant and ir- reverent disputers of this world should be rendered subservient to the elucidation and final confirmation of Christianity, than is that other unquestionable fact, " that the " persecutions which the first Christians " endured for the sake of their faith, and " by which its enemies confidently expect- " ed to crush it, powerfully contributed " to its rapid diffusion and final establish- " ment." It may seem an objection to this argu- ment, that harmony of doctrine and affec- tions is so strongly enjoined both by our Lord himself and his apostles, and that the faithful are warned to avoid those who should seek to sow divisions among them, as well as exhorted to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace ; and he indeed would have learned Christ to little purpose, who LECTURE I. 11 did not think it among the first of his du- ties, to promote, not only the spirit of bro- therly love among all his members, but that also which is its surest and best foundation, an entire agreement in all the articles of the Christian faith. Such a state of reli- gion is unquestionably the most favourable for the practice of every Christian virtue, when discordant passions have ceased to darken the understandings and pervert the affections of true believers ; and whatever branch of the universal church can most truly boast of such an union, so founded, among its members, may justly be consi- dered to have approached nearest to Chris- tian perfection. But that the kingdom of God is not yet so come among men, that his church in any nation or country may joyfully serve him in all godly quietness, without fear and without partiality, is la- mentably certain ; and while we humbly hope that all things are tending towards that blessed consummation, in so far at least as may consist with the militant state of the church upon earth, we cannot but see that obstacles to it exist, which it is be- 12 LECTURE I. yond the power of human wisdom to re- move by the most zealous efforts of reason or persuasion ; but for which a gradual re- medy appears to be provided even in that licence of discussion which springs out of religious corruption, and which, though nei- ther prompted nor guided by a spirit of sincere piety, may yet, in spite of itself, serve the cause of truth, by dissipating the fictions of error, which sophistry, ignorance, or fanaticism have raised to obscure it. In attributing, therefore, to the here- sies which at different periods have agi- tated the church, and which may not im- properly be regarded as symptoms of a diseased state of faith and morals, conse- quences ultimately beneficial to religion, we merely assert, that in this, as in other cases, the wisdom of God has brought good out of evil ; not that heresy is either good in itself, or void of fearful guilt to its authors ; although, like some who, as ""St. Paul says, preached Christ out of strife and conten- tion, and not sincerely, they may contri- « Phil. i. 16, &c. LECTURE I. 13 bute unintentionally to the advancement of true religion. It was but for a very short season that the primitive church enjoyed perfect inter- nal tranquillity, with untainted purity of faith. Even in the lifetime of the apostles the arrogance, folly, and corruption of man had ^brought in damnable heresies. Vari- ous errors were introduced into the infant church which they had planted, by- false brethren, and no inconsiderable part of their Epistles is occupied in the refutation of such errors, and in warning those to whom they wrote against the danger of being seduced by them. The history of the following ages exhibits a lamentable picture of the workings of the same per- verse spirit ; and in proportion as the pale of the church was extended among differ- ent nations and languages, the sources of corruption were multiplied and enlarged. Even before the great influx of the Gen- tiles into the church, which followed upon the conversion of Constantine, and the adop- b 2 Pet. ii. 1, &c. 14 LECTURE I. tion of Christianity for the religion of the Roman empire, many depravations of the Christian verity had crept into it, while Christians were yet exposed to the rage of persecution from without, and no worldly inducement existed within, to tempt the followers of a crucified Redeemer to vitiate their faith. But after that event heresies rapidly multiplied, of the greater part of which the names only now remain, to at- test that they once existed ; and while we are grieved in contemplating the actual corruptions of Christianity in some coun- tries, and the variety of doctrines which have arisen through the abuse of Christian liberty in others, it is yet a source of great consolation to observe how far they fall short of the absurdity and impiety of those pristine adulterations of evangelical truth, whose characteristic peculiarities have been preserved in ecclesiastical records. Various were the sources of those ancient heresies ; some originated with Jewish converts, who, in their zeal for the Mosaic dispensation, sought to amalgamate the old law with the new ; but a much greater proportion with * LECTURE I. 15 Gentiles, who had imperfectly unlearned their former superstitions, and still par- tially retained them after their conversion to Christianity ; and not a few were bor- rowed from different systems of heathen philosophy, which their authors, wedded to their former studies, attempted to blend with Christianity. Some again were the offspring of enthusiasm, which is ever the disease of weak minds, and some owed their birth to the more culpable love of singu- larity, and the vain desire of distinction, through which too many individuals, of un- sound principles and shallow understand- ings, have in all ages been tempted to seek a worthless celebrity by the propagation of error, rather than the silent approbation of a good conscience by maintaining the truth. To these causes severally the va- rious corruptions of Christian faith and doctrine in the early ages may be referred ; and the best practical view which, at this distance of time, we can take of them all collectively, is to look upon them as certain symptoms of that moral corruption of hu- man nature, which our holy religion was 16 LECTURE I. * intended to heal, and to learn from them, to beware for ourselves of departing on either side from that rule of faith and prac- tice which the divine Wisdom has prescribed to us. But a total cessation of such evi- dences of sinfulness and infirmity, though we are bound to pray for the continual in- crease of grace and truth, in the present condition of mankind we cannot hope to see; and hardly would such a degree of Christian perfection be compatible with that state of probation in which we are here placed for our final good. In fact, no age of the church has been, nor, as far as we can conjecture by a re- view of the past, and a consideration of the causes which have produced such effects, is ever likely to be, exempt from the infesta- tions of heresy. But it would be incon- sistent with the beUef that God is ever wise and good, and that his mercy is over all his works, to suppose that He would suffer the existence of error and division, without any countervailing good to be de- rived from them, and leave those whom the scriptures represent as the peculiar objects * LECTURE I. 17 of his regard, the poor, the simple, and un- learned, who must ever make up the bulk of mankind, exposed to the imminent danger of seduction through false apostles and false teachers, such as have disseminated their fa- natical delusions and pestilent perversions of the truth in every age, if the toleration of these partial evils was absolutely inconsist- ent with the purity and effectual influence of that religion which he has vouchsafed to reveal, and which all men are required to embrace, as the sole condition of obtaining eternal salvation. Nor does it appear to be a sufficient answer to such an objection, that it is only by the abuse of their own free will that men can be exposed to the danger of heresy, and that the justice and goodness of God are sufficiently vindicated, if he has afforded to all men the means of knowing the truth, but they choose error in prefer- ence to it. For, in fact, even in the most improved state of human society which has ever yet existed, or is ever likely to exist, there are few comparatively who are ca- pable of judging for themselves in contro- verted points of doctrine, but the greater 18 LECTURE I. * part must of necessity follow the direction of those whom they believe qualified by superior acquirements to guide them right; and there have been times when errors have widely infected the church, and seduced multitudes in almost every Christian na- tion. If therefore such errors, not proceed- ing from a wilful preference of darkness to light, nor accompanied with impurity of heart and moral corruption, could totally deprive those who ignorantly fell into them, or unconsciously imbibed them together with the first rudiments of knowledge, of the benefits of the gospel covenant, the goodness of God, and the honour of his moral government, would seem to require, that the possibility of so dreadful a conse- quence should be precluded, even by de- priving men, if the same end could not otherwise be attained, of that free agency which they were in so great danger of abus- ing to their own destruction, so as to con- vert the covenant of grace into an occasion of heavier condemnation. Still less is it consistent with the mercy of God and his love for man, which the scriptures teach LECTURE I. 19 us to consider as the essential, originating principle of Christianity, to suffer his gra- cious designs towards our fallen race to be rendered of none effect through causes springing out of the inherent infirmity of our nature, independent of our own indi- vidual wills, or to be defeated by the spirit of delusion. That God is ever gracious and merciful, and that he willeth not that any should perish everlastingly, but that all should be converted, and saved through the knowledge of the truth, is a point of faith which every Christian ought to hold as firmly as any article of his creed, and not to suffer any speculative view of mysterious and unsearchable truths to shake his confi- dence in this first principle of true piety. Seeing, therefore, that heresy, or the prin- ciple of discord, or by whatever other ap- pellation we may call it, (for we should not with indiscriminating severity affix the same stigma to the greatest and the smallest de- parture from orthodox opinion,) has been permitted to exist, and that, notwithstand- ing its intrinsically pernicious character, it has neither prevailed against the truth, nor c 2 20 LECTURE I. weakened its force, nor tainted its purity, but, on the contrary, that our holy religion has continued to shine forth with increas- ing brightness, in spite of those passing clouds which human perverseness from time to time has raised to obscure it, we are led to consider it as one of those means of apparent destruction, which the divine wisdom has converted to the furtherance of its own gracious purposes towards man- kind by the fuller confirmation of the truth. It is readily admitted, that if all who ever have professed themselves Christians, had been animated by a sincere faith and a du- tiful respect for our Lord's commands for the cultivation of unity and brotherly love, neither heresy nor discord could have found an entrance into the church. But this is a state of religion which in reality has never existed, and cannot therefore be assumed in ideal possibility as a ground of argument against that which is evident and palpable. It is indeed a degree of perfection, at which we are each in our several capacities bound to aim, but such as we cannot hope fully to attain, and much less that the aggre- LECTURE I. 21 gate Christian community shall ever be so changed from its present imperfect condi- tion, as to be uniformly influenced by a sense of religious duty ; since our Lord himself has assured us, that "" it must needs be that offences come, and that ^ the wheat and the tares must be left to grow together till the great harvest. Christianity, from the beginning, was de- signed for beings subject to much evil and many infirmities, which the whole power of religion is not more than sufficient to heal, where its doctrines are set forth with the greatest fidelity, and its precepts most sin- cerely obeyed. But if the fountain of living waters be itself defiled, if religion be con- taminated by those vices and follies of man- kind which it was intended to correct, or vitiated by the improbity of those whose especial office it is to guard its purity, till, like the salt which had lost its savour^, it become unfit for the purpose for which the divine Goodness designed it, and its corruptions be reduced to a system, it is c Matt, xviii. 7. ^ Matt. xiii. J29— 36. ^ Luke xiv. 34. C 3 22 LECTURE I. evident, that unless its original soundness and vitality can be restored, human de- pravity must be left to pursue its headlong course without check or remedy. When, therefore, moral degeneracy and infidel indifference had succeeded to the zeal and purity of the earlier ages, and gross darkness had well nigh overwhelmed the light of the gospel ; when, in conse- quence of the decay of true piety, the holy and reasonable service of Christianity had been supplanted by heathenish pomps and idle ceremonies, and spiritual holiness ex- changed for bodily austerities ; when the study of the holy scriptures was generally neglected, and fabulous legends, rivalling in absurdity, and scarcely inferior in impiety to the mythology of the heathen, had ban- ished from the minds of the deluded mul- titude all just notions of God and religion, it is evident that a crisis had arrived which required the exertion of an extraordinary force to burst the spell of delusion, and to renovate the faith, that it might not be- come utterly extinct, and the gates of hell finally prevail against the church. That such LECTURE I. gs was the state of religion during a long pe- riod, in which the Roman pontiffs exercised an absolute and undisputed power through every country in these parts of Europe, is attested by proofs which must bring con- viction to every unprejudiced mind, and is very faintly denied even by those to whose pretensions the admission of such a fact is fatal, however they may attempt to qualify or disguise it. At the same time we willingly admit that there have been holy, if not enlightened men, even in the darkest ages of the church. But that does not militate against our ar- gument. God did not leave himself wholly without witness in the heathen world, when it was generally overspread with supersti- tion and crime ; and still less is it to be supposed, that in the worst times of Chris- tianity there have not been some men wor- thy of the Christian name. But their num- ber was as nothing to the surrounding mass of ignorance and corruption ; and their en- deavours to rekindle knowledge, and awaken true piety, however honourable to them- selves and their religion, of which they c 4 24 LECTURE I. shone as lights in a dark place, were in- sufficient to effect any lasting amendment of faith or morals, even in the circumscribed scenes of their labours. A more efficient principle than individual zeal or example vras required to accomplish so great a work ; and until men were awakened by some strong excitement from the spiritual le- thargy in which they were sunk, there was no power of sufficient energy to dissipate ignorance, and break the bands of supersti- tion. Blind acquiescence in abused author- ity was the perpetual safeguard of cor- ruption ; and no remedy, short of the im- mediate interposition of divine power, ex- cept religious controversy of the most ani- mated kind, was adequate to the inveterate and complicated evils under which religion laboured. In that morbid state of religion, even the effervescence of human passions contributed to the removal of corruption, and strife and contention, under the su- preme control of divine Providence, were rendered auxiliary to the correction of that vitiated state of faith and morals out of which they sprung, and in some respects LECTURE I. m availed to supply the place of a purer zeal. Thus it was that, after a long night of palpable darkness, as the light of knowledge began again to dawn upon the world, a spirit of religious inquiry arose with it, which, from small and almost imperceptible beginnings, led, step by step, to that great event, the most important which has ever engaged the attention of mankind since the first preaching of the gospel — the reforma- tion of religion in the western church; which, after many indications of its ap- proach in different parts of Europe, at length, upon the revival of learning, and the renewed study of the holy scriptures, broke out with full force in the early part of the sixteenth century, and still continues to occupy the attention, and in various ways to interest the feelings of the Chris- tian world. The agitation of minds which commenced with that great crisis has not even yet subsided, and although the ex- ternal symptoms are less violent, we see and feel that the moving principle has not lost its force ; and we may be permitted to 26 LECTURE I. hope, that it will not cease to act, till, with the grace of God, it has had its perfect work ; till it has banished out of the uni- versal church those corruptions of faith, doctrine, and worship, which have given occasion to infidelity, and perpetuated dis- cord ; and until all true Christians are re- established in the unity of the Spirit and the bond of peace, not by blind and un- reasoning submission to any human au- thority, but by the increase of knowledge and the demonstration of the truth. The blessings of which the reformation has been the source to those nations of the Christian world which have embraced it, and indirectly even to those which have opposed it, can hardly be appreciated ade- quately to their vast importance. Without some knowledge of ecclesiastical history, in particular, no estimate can be formed of the extent and variety of good which it has accomplished. The light which sprung out of religion, as soon as it was freed from the incumbrances and pollutions of supersti- tion, widely diffused itself through the whole circumference of human affairs. It LECTURE L Tt was the commencement of a new era in the history of the human mind, and without incurring the charge of exaggeration from any competent judge, it may be confidently asserted, that its beneficial influence has been felt in every branch of learning, in every department of science, and in every institution of civil society. But how great soever the external and contingent benefits may be, which have at- tended the reformation, it is by its religious merits only, without worldly respects of any kind, unless in so far as they may be ad- mitted as evidences of its real character, that the cause of the reformation must be tried and decided. It did not originate in human policy, but, like Christianity itself, in the begin- ning made its way in opposition to tem- poral as well as spiritual power. Its sub- sequent influence in improving the tem- poral state of society could not have been contemplated by those who first raised their voices against the corruptions of Rome ; and among the many unworthy motives at- tributed to them by their adversaries, that 28 LECTURE I. of political calculation has hardly yet found a place. With its political consequences, therefore, we have properly no concern; and in the prosecution of these Lectures, in which it will be my humble endeavour to vindicate its general principle, as w^ell as the particular modification of it adopted and retained in this country, I propose carefully to abstain from all secular and ephemeral considerations, and to view it only according to its permanent and strictly religious bearings. Neither are we bound to justify every circumstance attending its rise and progress, nor to prove that those who laboured in its cause or patronised its increase, were free from the infirmities com- mon to man, though much may be said in extenuation of the errors into which they were sometimes hurried through the in- temperance of precipitate zeal, or goaded by virulent provocation. When first the human mind was relieved from the pressure of religious bondage, and men began to reason freely upon subjects concerning which it had before been hardly permitted to think, it is not to be wondered LECTURE I. 29 if they sometimes exceeded the bounds of moderation, and displayed their attachment to a cause which so strongly interested their feelings, with unbecoming vehemence ; nor is it any disparagement to the cause itself, if its ablest and most distinguished advocates were not agreed upon all points among themselves. According to the view which has been taken, collision of opinion was necessary, when first the spell of superstition was bro- ken, as in almost all cases it is highly con- ducive to the elucidation of truth. The sluggish mass of unreasoning apathy was to be awakened into life and motion, before it could be enlightened, and purged of its errors ; and we may be permitted, without irreverent presumption, to con- clude, that what we still behold, that very Concordia discors, that agreement among all Protestants concerning the main points of the Reformation, while at the same time they disputed warmly concerning matters of inferior moment, though yet not of tri- fling importance, was agreeable to the de- signs of divine Providence, to keep alive so LECTURE I. the vital principle of renovated religion, and to prevent the spark which had been struck out from being extinguished by su- pervening indifference, till it had blazed forth into a burning and a shining light. It has been the necessary consequence of this want of concert among the leaders of the reformation in different countries, that the local churches severally established un- der their auspices have been differently con- stituted, and that perfect harmony, which is so much to be wished among those who hold in common the same fundamental truths, and appeal to the same authority, the writ- ten word of God alone, in support of all the articles of faith which they respectively profess, and in vindication of every doc- trine which they maintain, is yet unaccom- plished ; and while every church which has thrown off the dominion of Rome is stig- matized with heresy and apostasy by the adherents of the papal power, each is occa- sionally called upon to defend itself against some imputation of error, on the part of those with whom it would wish to draw more close the bonds of mutual affection. LECTURE I. 31 Such is, more especially, the position of the established church of this kingdom, which, in asserting its own independence, neither retained demonstrable error, be- cause it pleaded the prescription of anti- quity against reason and scripture, nor em- braced novelties, because of the temporary charm which belongs to them, nor rejected what was useful and good, from a gratui- tous love of change. And as it is of the last importance to us all to know the ground whereon we stand, to be assured, on the one hand, that we are not in sinful schism, because we have renounced the communion of the church of Rome, and on the other, that we are in no degree partakers of her corruptions, because we have retained the primitive order of ecclesiastical ministry in- stituted by the apostles, and which that church has also retained, though not in its original purity; it will be my aim, in the ensuing Discourses, to vindicate our church from these opposite charges ; to shew, in an- swer to one class of accusers, that we did not separate from that of Rome, till her corruptions of faith, doctrine, and worship. 32 LECTURE I. had rendered it impossible to continue in her communion, without hazarding, or ra- ther abandoning the essentials of religion ; and to the other, that we retained nothing of her usages, but such as she had received in times antecedent to her corruption, and which were common to all churches found- ed by the apostles, and not peculiar to that of Rome. On many different points of the general argument, as it respects these va- rious heads, volumes have been written, which claim the profound attention of the student in theology, and to the demonstra- tive force of which it is scarcely possible that any thing can be added by the future advocates of our church, unless it be no- velty in the manner of conducting her de- fence, against similar novelty in the attacks of her adversaries. But the substantial me- rits of her cause have long been settled, in the opinion of candid and impartial judges, by irrefragable argument and testimony. To many, however, of her sound members, even in the educated classes of society, there is a want of leisure or inclination to enter deeply into the subject ; and by too many LECTURE I. 33 this most momentous inquiry, in an age, too, of much literary and scientific preten- sion, though none can be imagined more worthy of a truly philosophic mind, is over- looked with supercilious blindness, as if it was fit only to occupy the attention of those who are professionally bound to study it ; and that too, although more important con- sequences evidently depend upon it, even to the temporal welfare of mankind, than upon all the discoveries of science or the combinations of politics. Cautiously ab- staining, therefore, from abstruse subtleties, which are more fit to engage the retired student than the general inquirer, I trust it will not be deemed unseasonable, or fo- reign to the purpose of these Lectures, if I attempt to give a candid exposition of some of the most prominent of the causes which originally determined our separation from the church of Rome, and to shew, inde- pendently of all extraneous and temporary considerations, that they were not only of sufficient moment to justify that definitive measure, but to render the adoption of it an imperative duty. D 34 LECTURE I. In conclusion, I shall briefly advert to the principal differences which disunite us from our protestant brethren, my ultimate object being to shew, that as in respect to the church from which we have ourselves withdrawn, the reformation was on reli- gious grounds founded in absolute neces- sity ; so in respect to those who dissent from us on minor questions, though em- barked in the same great cause with us, that it was conducted on sound principles by our reformers, and terminated at the point which, when the heat of controversy shall have yielded to sober reflection, and the unreasonableness of inveterate preju- dice to the irresistible force of truth, wis- dom and piety must approve. This is the extent of my design ; and how imperfect soever the execution of it may be, I humbly pray that my insufficiency may never redound to the injury of the cause, which it is my anxious desire as well as my duty to serve ; and which, I am as- suredly persuaded, can never be overthrown by the efforts of its enemies, if not weak- ened and endangered by the indiscretion of LECTURE I. 35 its friends, who in the warmth of inconsi- derate zeal, without adequate experience and due preparation, may come forward to defend it. That the truth of God will finally pre- vail over all opposition, it would savour of infidelity to doubt. But in the opinion of the world plausible error, advantageously displayed, often obtains a transient superi- ority over it. The best founded confidence in the in- trinsic goodness of our cause should there- fore neither inspire us with presumption, nor render us inattentive to the legitimate means of promoting its success. D 2 LECTURE II, Matthew xi. 19. — JBut wisdom is justified of her children. The advocates of the church of Rome, in their contests with protestants, exhibit a pohcy which strongly indicates the con- scious weakness of their cause. Instead of ^bringing forth their strong reasons^ and appeahng to any mutually acknowledged authority in support of them, they endea- vour for the most part to preoccupy atten- tion with points of inferior moment, or of no moment at all, and studiously keep out of sight those weightier matters, on the right understanding of which the whole merits of the question between them and their opponents mainly depend; and not unfrequently they become the assailants, because they are unable to defend them- a Isaiah xli. 21. 38 LECTURE IL selves. Upon these principles they have acted from the reformation down to the present day ; and the modern champions of the cause still continue to tread in the footsteps of those who have gone before them, adopting only such modifications as the different circumstances under which they write appear to suggest. To use unnecessary harshness in charac- terizing the conduct of an adversary in any case is ungenerous, and more likely to in- jure than to benefit the party which has recourse to it. But in controversies of re- ligion, from which passion and prejudice should as far as possible be excluded, it is peculiarly unbecoming ; and they who ar- gue in behalf of Christian truth should be careful to do it in a Christian spirit ; and not indulge in asperity of expression, be- yond what the necessity of the case de- mands. Neither would it be wise, in form- ing an estimate of the feelings of Roman Catholics towards the church of which we are members, or the protestant name in general, to lay too great a stress on the reasonings or statements of obscure and LECTURE IL 89 narrow-minded writers ^ who may be dis- avowed by their superiors, if their absurdity and intemperance should threaten injury to their own cause. But if we look to those whose characters stand highest for talents and literary ac- quirements, and whose authority is held in the highest estimation among the members of their own community, we shall still find such a lamentable want of equity and can- dour, as can be accounted for only by the intolerant principles of their church ; and it is as true of the main pillars of the papal cause as of its meanest supporters, that the expedients on which their chief reliance is placed are such as we cannot truly charac- terize, without departing from that mode- ration and forbearance which on all ac- counts it is most desirable to observe ^ and which are more especially suited to such a ^ Such as Eusebius Andrews, and others of the same stamp. c I allude here more particularly to Gandolphy's Ser- mons, Lingard's History, Milner's End of Religious Controversy, and Butler's Book of the Roman Catholic Church, all modern productions of English Roman Ca- tholics. D 4 40 LECTURE 11. cause as we maintain, and which requires indeed nothing more than impartial con- sideration to ensure its preponderance in every mind accessible to truth. It may be pleaded on the part of our ad- versaries, that they are not guilty of inten- tional injustice; that whatever they advance against us they believe to be founded in reason and fact; and the strong delusion to which they have given themselves up may render it credible that they are so per- suaded. But in acquitting them of wilful unfaithfulness, their competency either as advocates or witnesses of the truth will be little benefited by attributing their multi- form misrepresentations to the influence of delirious bigotry, which distorts and disco- lours every object presented to the mind's eye. Nor is there, after all the allowance which can reasonably be made for the ef- fects of such a mental distemper, any suf- ficient apology for receiving and asserting as true, whatever, by such candid and dili- gent inquiry as the importance of the sub- ject demands of every sincere man, might certainly be discovered not to be so. LECTURE II. 41 It is unnecessary to the attainment of essential truth, which is the only valuable end of inquiry, to notice the many irrele- vant arguments and unjust representations v^hich have been employed to discredit the reformation, nor could it be accomplished in the most cursory manner within a much greater space than these Lectures afford. Without adverting, therefore, to those mi- nor topics, which have been introduced only to embarrass and confound and distract attention, I shall apply myself solely to the consideration of such heads of controversy as are of essential importance to the right understanding of the real question between our church and that of Rome ; viz. " Which " of the two, in its actual state, is the more " justly entitled to be considered as a true " church of Christ ?" abstaining as much as possible from every thing which can irritate or offend, without contributing to elucidate the truth, at the same time suppressing nothing which the vindication of our prin- ciples necessarily requires to be candidly asserted. In two particulars, however, a slight de- 42 LECTURE II. parture from this course appears to be re- quisite ; and the examination of these shall form the substance of the present Lecture, that we may afterwards proceed without prejudice to the discussion of those funda- mental positions on which, religiously con- sidered, the cause of the reformation must stand or fall ; and on none but such as are properly and exclusively religious would any honest inquirer or sincere Christian wish to see it maintained. That this course of proceeding is not agreeable to Roman Catholics we have already observed. They have used all sorts of weapons to dazzle the ignorant and superficial, and to secure to themselves an apparent victory : but on none do they appear to place so much re- liance as on the imputations which they incessantly cast on the personal characters and motives of the reformers, and the ef- fects which, with the blindest injustice, they persist in attributing to the reformation it- self What the real importance of these cri- minations may be, and what weight they ought to have in determining the judgment LECTURE II. 43 of pious and prudent men, is therefore a subject in a general point of view entitled to our serious consideration. It is natural to wish that the undertakers and perfecters of every great and good work, more especially of such as has for its pro- fessed object the glory of God and the spi- ritual good of men, should not only be free from great blemishes, but, if possible, supe- rior even to the infirmities incident to the nature of ordinary men ; and if the prin- ciple be not carried to excess, it cannot be denied that it is reasonable and just to form our judgment of the motives and intentions of those, who profess more than a common zeal in such a cause, by their known cha- racter and conduct in the ordinary relations of life. It is not only agreeable to the com- mon feelings of mankind to judge by this rule, but in the second chapter of the Epistle to the Romans we find St. Paul pointedly arguing against the hypocrisy of those who condemned sin in others while they conti- nued in the practice of it themselves. We see also the same principle exemplified in its abuse by the insidious policy of the Pha- 44 LECTURE II. risees, who, when they found themselves un- able to impeach the doctrine of our Lord, calumniated him to the people as ^ a glut- tonous man and a winebihher^ a friend of publicans and sinners^ hoping by such slan- derous charges to destroy his influence with the people, if they could but persuade them that his life w^as inconsistent with the cha- racter which he assumed of a teache?* sent from God, In like manner the apostles also were traduced as disturbers of the public peace, and suhverters of the world ; while at the same time they afforded not the slightest pretext for such a charge, but proved equally by their conduct and their doctrines, that respect for lawful authority, of every kind and degree, was enforced and cherished by them as a part of religious duty. It is therefore the less to be won- dered, that the treatment which the re- formers have experienced from Roman Ca- tholic historians and controversialists should be precisely similar in kind. But indeed the animosity with which the most vene- d Luke vii. 34. LECTURE II. 45 rable names among them are still attacked, and the rancour with which every anti- quated charge is repeated against them, however suspicious or improbable the ori- ginal grounds of it may be, afford a melan- choly proof how soon the principles of true religion are forgotten, when men give them- selves up to the blind intemperance of a bi- goted spirit, while at the same time they furnish a strong presumption against the general credibility of those accusations, which were alleged against them by con- temporary writers ; who, in addition to the heat of so great a controversy, were ani- mated by feelings of personal resentment, or allured by prospects of ambition, to sig- nalize their zeal against the authors of a change which portended such a diminution of their own influence and power. Against such calumnious attacks the characters of the reformers in general, both in this and other countries, have been abundantly vin- dicated, where at least freedom of discus- sion is not precluded by the power and po- licy of their adversaries. And though we claim not for the re- 46 LECTURE II. formers of our own church an exemption from human failings, we have just cause to bless God for the grace bestowed on them, when we contemplate the examples which they have left us of piety and zeal, as well as of patient fortitude, in supporting the dreadful sufferings through which, like the first Christians, they were doomed to pass in the execution of their holy enterprise. And if some of those, whose memory is most dear and venerated among us, exhi- bited, under the near prospect of fiery trials, something of human weakness, instead of insulting their memories with envenomed malignity, as too many of those have con- tinued to do, who have succeeded to the inheritance of those tenets and principles against which they contended unto blood, it would better become them to lament the cruel excesses of their predecessors, and to disclaim any community of feeling with men, who, whether instigated by polemic rage, or a still more detestable spirit of worldly policy, outwent the barbarity of pagan persecutions under the cloke of reli- gious zeal. But the bitter calumnies in- LECTURE II. 47 vented and continually repeated against the leaders of the reformation, are not only un- worthy of any cause which good men may espouse, but have recoiled upon those who have condescended to employ them, as false representations generally do, and by their extravagance have refuted themselves. For if we admit, for the sake of argument, that the reformers were such as their enemies have painted them^, it must necessarily fol- low, that they could have had no adherents, unless among the most worthless members of society, a fact which even their accusers have not yet ventured to affirm, and in the next generation both themselves and their reformation could have been remembered 07ily to be abhorred. A short-lived enthusiasm has often been excited in favour of a bad cause, and the leaders and abettors of imposture have en- joyed the misplaced applause of their own generation. But truth and reason must in time resume their empire, and impartial ^ Vide passim Bossuefs Variations of Protestants, Mil- ner's End of Controversy, and Butler's Book of the Ro- man Catholic Church. 48 LECTURE 11. posterity seldom fails to atone for the in- justice and folly of preceding times, and to stamp, according to their respective merits, the opposing champions of every denomina- tion ; and yet it is certain, that, after the most rigid scrutiny into their conduct and principles, the chiefs of the reformation have lost nothing of that veneration which the suffrages of former generations had awarded them ; and the railing accusations of their adversaries have been more inju- rious to the reputation of their authors, and the cause in support of which such im- moral means have been employed, than of those against whom they have been directed. But, after all that can be said on either side, of what value is this personal argu- ment in deciding the merits of the reform- ation ? While the Roman pontiffs arrogate to themselves such powers and prerogatives as are shocking to Christian piety, and claim little less than the attributes of Divinity, it might indeed be reasonably expected, that they should at all times be free at least from gross vices, and eminent in religious and moral virtue. And yet, though the LECTURE II. 49 contrary is most notorious with respect to many of them, and among the rest concern- ing him who filled the papal chair when first Luther rose up in opposition to his spiritual domination, no rational protestant would ever think that alone a sufficient justification of the conduct of so many Christian communities in rejecting his au- thority, and renouncing the fellowship of the Romish church ; and still less could it be pleaded in vindication of the continu- ance of that separation, if causes of infi- nitely greater moment than the personal merits or demerits of any individual, or number of individuals, at any given time, had not determined them to adopt it, and to persist in maintaining it. The duty of preserving the unity of the body of Christ is too strongly enforced in scripture to admit the breach of it, unless the preserva- tion of truth and holiness demand it ; and unless we can prove to our Roman Catholic brethren, that our reformation was con- ducted and perfected upon that principle, we must submit to bear the reproach of heresy and schism, which they so unspar- 50 LECTURE 11. ingly cast upon us, and acknowledge our- selves guilty of criminal contumacy in re- fusing allegiance to their spiritual head. But if, while we venerate the memory of those who conducted our reformation, we ground not that great work upon their per- sonal merits, nor place any reliance on the notorious corruptions of the Romish hier- archy, at that period, in vindication of it, unless in so far as those corruptions were the natural or necessary consequence of their system of religion, we must not suffer them, on their side, to convert that which is altogether a question of principles into a personal dispute, nor to attack the reforma- tion itself through the real or imputed faults and imperfections of any of its ad- vocates. Still less must we allow the con- duct of princes or statesmen, who may have been influenced by worldly respects, by re- sentment, cupidity, or ambition, in adopting or defending it, to have any weight in de- termining our judgment concerning it. The despotic violence of that prince, whose quarrel with the see of Rome first made an opening for the reformation in LECTURE 11. 51 this country, has but an accidental con- nection with the reformation itself. It can- not be supposed that a man of his character was much influenced by religious feelings in the inconsistent conduct which he pur- sued, alternately formidable to its friends and its enemies ; and it is probable that he espoused it principally because it favoured his purpose of emancipating his own sove- reignty from the spiritual supremacy of the pope, and possessing himself of the enor- mous wealth which superstitious delusion or mistaken piety had heaped upon the monastic orders. Whatever his measures were, he acted under the influence of his own policy or passion ; and when Roman Catholics attempt to bring forward his con- duct as an argument against the reforma- tion of our national church, it is little less than an acknowledgment, that on religious grounds they find it unassailable ; while, at the same time, if there was any value in recrimination, we might retort with tenfold severity the massacres and persecutions committed by Roman Catholic sovereigns in almost every country of Europe, at the E 2 52 LECTURE 11. instigation of Romish ecclesiastics, and even of the popes themselves, and seconded by their warmest applause. Not a few such unhappy princes, misled by their spiritual guides, have earned for themselves an im- mortality of infamy, scarcely exceeded by that of the most cruel heathen persecutors of the church^; but which ought to attach, in an aggravated degree, to the memory of those faithless ministers of religion, of whose spiritual wickedness they were the deluded, but not guiltless instruments. But whatever advantage, in respect to the personal merits of the friends and enemies of the reformation, might result from such a comparison, to the protestant cause — and a greater could not well be desired — we re- ject it altogether, as irrelevant to the sub- ject of debate between us. The truth of God will stand, though all men should be found liars ; and what is essentially good cannot be depraved by the perverseness of those who abuse it. In ^ Such as our unhappy Mary, Francis the First, Phi- hp the Second, Charles the Ninth, Lewis the Fourteenth, &c. Charles Emanuel of Savoy, &c. LECTURE II. 53 every other case this principle is admitted. We do not therefore reject, as false or use- less, the moral philosophy of the Socratic school, because many who made profession of it were untrue to their own principles, and led immoral lives ; nor would it be less unreasonable to condemn indiscriminately the entire system of religion professed in the church of Rome, because its highest places have sometimes been filled by bad men, or even reputed infidels ; and many of its external defenders have had little other proof of faith to shew, except that very equivocal one of persecuting zeal, against such as popes and councils had marked out for destruction with the stigma of heresy, if the system itself was sound and good. It is certainly time, and much to be desired, that all such causes of animosity should be buried in oblivion, if we were not com- pelled, by the pertinacity of our opponents, to refer to them for the purpose of refuting misrepresentations, which they are still too industrious to propagate. But the paramount question of the ne- cessity and effects of the reformation must E S 54 LECTURE 11. be considered and determined in total dis- tinction from the merits of individuals; and the secondary causes, of whatever kind, v^hich operated to advance or impede its progress. It is not in the world, but in the church, that we must look for the condem- nation or justification of it. If the pre- viously existing state of religion, both in principle and practice, was conformable to the true spirit of Christianity ; if essential truth was preserved, and not defiled by the intermixture of falsehood, and additions of human invention ; if articles of faith were not imposed as necessary to salvation, for which the support of divine authority is nowhere to be found ; if the modes of wor- ship used in the church were pure and spi- ritual ; if the sacraments appointed by our Lord Jesus Christ were faithfully ministered according to his institution ; if the doctrine of the gospel was truly preached, and the faith once delivered to the saints inculcated diligently and without disguise ; then, in- deed, whatever corruption of life and man- ners may have attached to the rulers of the church, we will admit that no adequate LECTURE II. 55 cause existed for a perpetual separation from their communion. But if the contrary to all these supposi- tions were true ; if, in the ages of ignorance which followed the downfal of the Roman empire and the extinction of learning, such depravations had either been introduced into religion through the policy of church- men, or had imperceptibly crept in during that long period of darkness, that when the light of reason began again to dawn upon a benighted world, men became sensible of the deformity which through such causes had been brought upon religion, the neces- sity of reformation must be admitted by every lover of truth, who believes that reli- gion is not the device of human policy, which may be changed and accommodated to the prevalent inclinations of men, but that it is, in very deed, of divine authority, and immutable in its doctrines and pre- cepts ; and if, through the blindness or per- verseness of the rulers of the world or the church, this necessary work could not be effected with universal consent, then, how much soever it may be the duty of Chris- E 4 56 LECTURE 11. tians, in other cases, to avoid the causes of disunion, and to sacrifice all personal in- terests and feelings to the preservation of the church's peace, yet the truth and purity of religion, for the guardianship of which the church itself was founded, and ever exists, were not to be surrendered to the fear of disturbing its repose for a season. For unity without sincerity is not the unity which our Lord has enjoined upon his fol- lowers, and the sin of schism must for ever lie at the door of those who make acqui- escence in gross and palpable error the con- dition of remaining in their communion ; not of those who refuse to dissemble before God, and solemnly to profess concerning things of the highest and most awful mo- ment, what in their inmost conscience they believe to be contrary to his word and will. Upon these grounds the necessity of re- nouncing the church of Rome may be abun- dantly proved. Nor was it necessary, as we have before observed, that the leaders of the reforma- tion should be free from the errors and in- firmities of human nature. LECTURE II. 57 They pretended to no new revelation ; they came not, as it has been insincerely alleged by their adversaries, to plant a new religion in the world, but, by the ap- plication of that rule which the divine Wisdom has provided for the perpetual re- medy against all corruptions through all ages, to free that which was planted at the first by Christ and the apostles, from the mass of extraneous and incongruous matter by which it had been darkened and over- loaded, and to exhibit it again in that beauty of holiness and simplicity of truth, by which its influence over pious and can- did minds is most firmly and beneficially established. To accomplish this, it was not necessary that the Almighty should raise up men endowed with supernatural powers, or exhibiting, in any way, proofs of an ex- traordinary mission from him. Nor did the reformers lay claim to such a character. Zeal, sincerity, and firmness, with a com- petent share of learning, and an intimate knowledge of holy scripture, were the espe- cial qualifications which their undertaking demanded ; and the proof that they were 58 LECTURE 11. instruments in the hand of God for achiev- ing the great work to which they had de- voted all their energies, and for the sake of which they subjected themselves to evils from which the weakness of human nature shrinks, must be sought in the issue of their labours, and the restoration of reli- gion which resulted from them ; not in their individual characters, nor in their mental or moral endowments. Indeed, whatever influence their personal qualities may have had upon the immediate success of their endeavours, that is at this time rather mat- ter of historical curiosity than practical im- portance. While we venerate the characters of our martyred confessors, we build no- thing upon their authority. We do not make our appeal to them for the decision of our religious controversies, but, after their example, to an infinitely higher juris- diction. The foundations of our faith are precisely the same as they would have been, if preceding corruptions had never rendered reformation necessary. We prove nothing by their dictation, but by the rule of scrip- ture only ; and our faith is built (as that of LECTURE 11. 59 the primitive church was) upon the found- ation of the apostles and prophets^ Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone ^. Nor is the most holy cause of our religion desecrated, even if it can be proved that the temporal princes who espoused the reform- ation were determined by worldly reasons only. We would fain beliave, indeed, and have fair grounds for believing, that their mo- tives in general were laudable and good. But whether in the part which they per- formed they were actuated by the policy of Jehu or the piety of Josiah, they were equally subservient to the cause of religion. They afforded the most essential assistance towards the removal of the evils which op- pressed it, by resisting the pretensions of the pope, and shaking off his dominion ; which, wherever it was maintained in un- broken force, rendered all attempts at re- formation hopeless of success, and destruc- tive to their authors. Death, confiscation, and imprisonment, were every where array- ed against them. They were hunted down s Eph. ii. 20. 60 LECTURE II. as heretics on the one side, and devoted to destruction, as enemies to the civil authority, on the other ; and so long as the temporal and ecclesiastical powers were confederated by the bonds of a common interest against every attempt to correct error and remove corruption, the evil was without remedy. Whatever, therefore, the particular causes of their disagreement may have been, it was clearly for the advantage of true reli- gion that a field was opened for its ad- vocates by the mutual opposition of its ene- mies ; and far from its bringing reproach upon our cause, we have reason to bless God, and to admire the ways of his provi- dence, who made those who least intended it instrumental to its advancement, by ex- citing the jealousy of the temporal sove- reign against the encroachments of the spi- ritual usurper, and inflaming the rapacity of the one against the unhallowed exactions of the other. The remaining objection to the reform- ation, which it was proposed at present to notice, relates to its effects ; which its ad- versaries assert to have been altogether in- LECTURE II. 61 jurious to religion, and productive of no- thing but anarchy and confusion ; and in support of this charge, they rely chiefly upon the discrepancy of doctrine between the reformed churches in general, and the variations which have taken place in the confessions of faith set forth by some of them in particular at different periods. This has been exhibited as a most tri- umphant argument against the reformation generally, and has been urged with great plausibility, and concocted with infinite ar- tifice, by its most subtle and inveterate ene- mies, as a decisive termination of the con- troversy in their favour. They tell us that while protestants have almost as many dif- ferent confessions of faith as there are dif- ferent churches among them, catholic unity is every where preserved inviolable under the papal system, and that there is not an iota of difference between the adherents of the sovereign pontiff from " ^ Ireland to " Chili, from Canada to India" and China ; from whence they infer that their church is guided by the Holy Spirit, but that all h Milner, Part II. Letter 16. 62 LECTURE 11. who do not symbolize with it are given up to the spirit of delusion. Formidable as this argument may look at first view, it will be evident, on a nearer inspection, that a weaker could hardly be constructed in support of a baseless cause. That this boasted unity does exist in the Romish church, we may admit without giv- ing them any advantage ; for all, in fact, which is proved by it, if true, is that which protestants have always objected to them as a reproach ; i. e. that under their system submission to authority has been substituted for faith, and uniformity of ignorance pre- ferred to the investigation of truth. And since the right of private judgment is ex- orcised among them, as something in its very nature monstrous and impious, it is no more to be wondered that no difference of opinion subsists where no man is allow- ed to have an opinion, than that the blind should not dispute concerning colours, nor the deaf concerning sounds ; and it is for want of that wholesome spirit of discussion and inquiry, which is equally consistent with sincere piety and Christian liberty, LECTURE 11. 63 that popery has subsided into a stagnant pool of corruption, to which no gale from Heaven imparts motion, and which no healthful current pervades and purifies. They glory in the total surrender of their reasoning faculties to their earthly head. They deem it a sufficient account of their faith " ' to believe what the church be- " lieves," and if we look into the constitu- tion of the church, in the sense which they attribute to it, and trace the whole chain of dependence from the lowest link to the highest, we shall find at last that one fal- lible mortal vainly pretending to infallibi- lity, thinks, believes, prescribes, and deter- mines, in all points of religion, for every member of his communion ; while they on their part receive whatever he ordains with the passive uniformity of instinct. Accord- ing to the most recent and moderate ^ as- sertor of the pope's pretensions in this coun- try, " his judgment in all cases connected " with religion is final." He is in fact the living oracle of the church, the dictator of i Milner, Part II. Letter 16. ^ Butler, Book of Roman Catholic Church, p. 122. 64 LECTURE 11. its faith, and the Loi^d ove?' God's heritage, an assumption disallowed indeed by St. Peter, (1 Ep. v. 3.) from whom the Roman pontiffs audaciously pretend to derive their spiritual sovereignty ; and as if the know- ledge of divine things was confined by geo- graphical limits, and no more than a re- flected ray of it shone on this side the Alps, we are told, without a blush, " ^ that " when Rome has spoken, the cause is de- " termined." That protestants, on the other hand, have too often abused the right of free judgment, is undoubtedly true, and greatly to be la- mented. But which of the most excellent gifts of God has not been abused by the folly and perverseness of men ? and yet it has not been deemed necessary on that ac- count by the divine Wisdom to withdraw them, or to impose any other than moral restraints on the use of them. And so it is in religion. For every gift of nature or grace we are responsible to the almighty Giver. They are talents committed to our charge, for the use of which we must one I Butler, Book of Roman Catholic Church, p. 122. LECTURE 11. 65 day give account, and of none a more awful account, than of the right, or, to speak more properly, the duty of judging for ourselves concerning those things which we are re- quired to believe and do, as the conditions of eternal salvation. And though individuals may irreverently abuse it to their own great danger, their folly does not defeat the gracious purpose of God, nor make any sensible diminution of the aggregate good which through the right use of it accrues to religion. Nor is it any disparagement to the re- formation, that temporary or even perma- nent differences have subsisted between the reformed churches respectively, or that few if any of them have retained without vari- ation the formal confessions which they adopted at their first separation from Rome. What has been said of the reformers indi- vidually may be equally applied to the re- formed churches collectively. For neither do we claim infallibility, which we hold to be the prerogative of God alone, and such as cannot be assumed by human beings without extreme impiety. F 66 LECTURE II. It is therefore a futile objection to say, that some have given up, as uncertain or unnecessary, points which, in the heat of controversy, they viewed in a different light, or that they have not yet been able to come to a perfect agreement among themselves re- ciprocally concerning all things which they retain and deem of perpetual obligation. Whoever will but candidly consider the nature of their differences will find, that they relate, for the most part, not to essen- tial articles of Christian faith, but to ab- struse and difficult points, concerning which it would always be most wise to reason with the greatest moderation, and to exercise the greatest mutual forbearance. But when religious controversy occupied every mind, and the smallest shades of dif- ference were magnified into importance by the heat of disputation, it was scarcely pos- sible to leave such points untouched; and it is no just reproach to the protestant churches, that they have not been deter- mined by all alike. Perfect unanimity on subjects of so eva- nescent and subtle a nature is unattainable LECTURE 11. 67 in our present state of infirmity, and could only be the result of perfect knowledge, which is superior to all error, or of submis- sive ignorance, which indolently admits for truth whatever by assumed authority is boldly declared to be so. Speculative ques- tions, however, were as vehemently and dis- cordantly debated among the schoolmen before the reformation, as they have been by those who have adopted its principles since ; and although they are now insisted upon as proofs that the protestant churches are disowned and forsaken of God, yet so long as those who were engaged in such disputes were agreed in submission to the authority of Rome, all minor differences were little regarded. But not only do these partial dissensions among protestants afford no dangerous ground of objection to their opponents ; it may be even doubted whe- ther the most perfect union among them could have produced equal benefit to re- ligion. The representations which history gives of the general ignorance of the people con- cerning religion before the reformation, are F 2 68 LECTURE II. too well attested to admit a doubt in the main, even if some particulars should be overcharged. For the same state of igno- rance is still seen to keep its ground, where no form of Christianity is tolerated but that of the church of Rome. In those countries no ray of light is seen to pervade the gross darkness in which the body of the people are involved; but superstition retains an undiminished hold upon minds studiously kept in lethargic inactivity, and no alterna- tive is left but unlimited credulity or total unbelief; while in protestant countries, by the natural consequences of discussion and inquiry, the knowledge of religion has been widely diffused, and an active zeal excited to extend its influence, and impart the means of instruction to every class of the community, so that ignorance is almost left without excuse ; and without claiming a miraculous exertion of divine power in for- warding the reformation, we need not hesi- tate to affirm, that a blessing has visibly at- tended it, and that it has been proved by its fruits to be conducive to the glory of God and the happiness of man. LECTURE 11. 69 But our more immediate concern is the vindication of our own church against the calumnies with which it is still assailed by those whose corruptions it has renounced. It is indeed a source of gratification, as well as a ground of confidence, to every sound member of the protestant episcopal church, established in this country, to ob- serve how timid and reluctant its Roman Catholic adversaries are to engage in a con- test of fair argument against it. Its doctrines and discipline they feel to be unassailable, and it is chiefly through the sides of others that they seek to wound it. This uncandid policy, unworthy of a religious cause, has been pursued by the most subtle and inveterate of its adversaries from the time when our church obtained a final settlement to the present day. Avail- ing themselves of the loose sense in which the name of Protestant is used, as the com- mon designation of all those who reject the papal supremacy, and having culled toge- ther all the absurdities, follies, or impieties, of which the several sects calling themselves Protestants have been guilty, they charge F 3 70 LECTURE 11. upon all collectively a participation of the same guilt ; and by means of this dishonest artifice, impute to us the corruptions of Arians, Socinians, Unitarians, and have not even blushed to attribute to us a common origin v^ith Manicheans, and vrhatever else is most odious in the list of ancient and modern heresies. No doubt they have deemed it expedient, for the perpetuation of their own system, to raise such a mist of prejudice around us, as should deter their remaining adherents from looking into our principles, and judging for themselves ; and it is for the same reason that they presume to pronounce us excluded from the hopes of eternal salvation, to which they say that none can be admitted who are not com- prised within the pale of their own church, unless (the sole exception which they allow) in the case of invincible ignorance ^ To those who have not this to plead for not seeking reconciliation with the church of Rome, they denounce, in the unregenerate spirit of blind uncharitableness, inevitable 1 Roman Catholic Catechism ; Papal Bull of Indiction. Milner, Part III. Lett. 50, in conclusion. LECTURE II. 71 perdition, from which neither faith, nor works, nor sufferings for Christ's sake, can deliver them ; while at the same time they acknowledge, and even urge it as an argu- ment against them, that protestants are not guilty of the same unchristian arrogance in return ™. God forbid that we should ever cease to be entitled to an acquittal from the guilt of following such an example ! Our concern is not to render railing for railing, nor to arm against us the feelings of those whose reason, with God's blessing, we would much rather convince. Abstaining, therefore, as much as may be from all such topics, and considering those against whom we argue as brethren in Christ, and adversaries only in the maintenance of what we conscientiously believe to be great and dangerous errors concerning some heads of that divine faith, in the general profes- sion of which we are both agreed, I shall proceed, as I proposed, to a review of the most prominent of those causes which first rendered our separation from the church of Rome necessary, and which still render a "1 Milner, Part III. Lett. 50. Conclusion. F 4 72 LECTURE II. reunion with it utterly impossible. One preliminary objection which they uniformly urge against all protestant churches, and which, if valid in its full extent, would for ever be conclusive against all reformation, it may however be convenient previously to examine. And as this objection is inti- mately connected with some of the most obnoxious characteristics and inadmissible pretensions of the church of Rome, the ex- amination of it will be but an apparent di- gression from the intended course of our ar- gument ; while at the same time it will tend towards the conclusion at which we aim. This shall form the main business of the next Lecture. Amen. Note. The term " Papist," sometimes, though rarely, occurring in these Lectures, to avoid circumlocution, is not applied with any intentional disrespect to the mem- bers of the church of Rome, who prefer being styled " Catholics." But this appellation, in the exclusive sense in which they claim it, no well instructed protestant can ever concede to them. And after all, it seems rather in- consistent, that the professed adherents of the pope should object to be so designated. In like manner " Popery" is used for the sake of brevity, and at the same time as most properly characteristic of that form of Christianity, in which subjection to the pope is declared to be necessary to salvation. LECTURE III Matthew x. 37, 38. He that loveth father or mother more than me is not worthy of me : and he that loveth son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me. And he that taJceth not his cross, and follow- eth after me, is not worthy of me. A HE preliminary objection advanced by papists against the reformation, to which I alluded at the close of my last Lecture, may be most conveniently considered in subordination to the principle asserted in the text. We there learn, from the figu- rative expressions of our Lord, thrice re- peated with increasing emphasis, that there is no tie of nature so sacred or so tender, which must not give way to the demands of our duty towards him ; no sacrifice of worldly interest or security, which we may refuse to make, if such an evidence be re- quired to prove that we are truly his dis- ciples. And as he himself professed before 74 LECTURE III. Pilate, that the very end for which he came into the world was, that he might bear wit- ness to the truth, it clearly follows, that we cannot sincerely love him, if we are indif- ferent to the truth which he came to teach; or, if we suffer any worldly considerations to prevail upon us to reject it, or to con- tinue in error, which we perceive to be such, especially if it be of such a nature as to vitiate our faith or worship, and at the same time so palpable, that the honest ex- ercise of a plain understanding is sufficient to detect it. It was therefore in vain for Jews or Pa- gans to be, as we read in the gospel that many of the former were, secretly his dis- ciples, while they were restrained by regard to their temporal interests or the world's opinion, from avowing their faith, and ac- knowledging him before men for their Mas- ter. So likewise in this maturity of the religion of which he was then the preacher, it must be in the highest degree dangerous, from the same interested inducements, to dissemble our conviction, and to decide be- tween the conflicting claims of different LECTURE III. 75 churches or sects, in favour of that which is recommended by secular advantage only, or party prejudice, or any other imaginable motive of preference, except the unfeigned love of Christian truth. The fervours of enthusiasm are at the same time not less to be guarded against than worldly affections ; and our Christian liberty must be exercised with cautious hu- mility and dispassionate moderation. Good intentions are no excuse for pre- sumptuous ignorance attempting to stretch itself beyond its measure ; and it is utterly inconsistent with any rational notion of true piety to stir up dissension for trivial causes, and to hazard the interruption of that peace and charity, which the commands of our divine Master, and the exhortations of his apostles, require all Christians to cultivate, unless when the still more important obli- gation of maintaining the essential doctrines of Christianity whole and undefiled, cannot otherwise be fulfilled. Then only the evils of discord and tem- porary confusion are to be encountered, in the hope that they may be again healed, 76 LECTURE III. and that all who are sincere in faith and in the study after truth, may in God's good time be reunited in the undissembled pro- fession of it. It is only by a faithful and conscientious application of these principles that a duti- ful and necessary interruption of religious communion can be distinguished from sec- tarian levity and presumption. Human passions and worldly reasonings must not be allowed to have any weight in determining the judgment concerning spi- ritual things. Christianity, if allowed to have its proper influence in human affairs, by purifying the affections, calming the pas- sions, and correcting the moral sentiments of men, is not only consistent with their temporal happiness, but is alone capable of advancing it to the highest degree of per- fection compatible with our present state of existence. But to effect this, it must lead, not follow ; it must be to things tem- poral what the rational soul is to the body, the pervading and governing principle ; and any attempt to render it subservient to poli- tical convenience or civil institutions, while LECTURE III. 77 it can have no other consequence than that of defiling its purity and diminishing its efHcacy, is but a modification of that sinful insincerity, against which our Saviour .warns us, of attempting to serve God and mammon. No sincere and sober-minded Christian, therefore, will ever be influenced by such considerations in embracing the form of faith and doctrine, through which he hopes to obtain everlasting salvation ; and far from catching at frivolous pretexts for leaving that which he has previously believed to be the true and acceptable way of serving God, he will adopt the resolution of so doing rather as a painful alternative, upon a full and deliberate conviction that he can no longer safely or innocently continue in it. Upon these principles our own renun- ciation of the church of Rome must be judged. If the grounds of our disagreement are of questionable certainty, or relate to things indifferent or of small moment, the sin of schism, with all its contingent and probable consequences of heresy and uncharitable- ness, rests upon us. If, on the contrary. 78 LECTURE III. the maintenance of the vital purity of our religion demanded our secession from that church, it was then an act of indispensable duty to adopt it, and in perfect unison with the fundamental maxim of obeying God ra- ther than man, and shewing our love for Christ by keeping his commandments, in- stead of putting our trust in beings like ourselves, and subjecting our faith to their dictation. The force of historic truth has compelled the most strenuous advocates of Rome to acknowledge that many abuses and depra- vations of religion existed in the church, when first Luther broke the slumbers of the Christian world; and while they load the reformers with obloquy, they virtually admit the necessity of reformation. The admissions of individuals, however, are not wanted to strengthen our cause. Before its unexpected commencement in Germany, reformation had already been de- clared necessary by the highest authorities in the church itself, even by popes and councils ; and when that crisis had arrived, it was demanded, with an almost unanimous LECTURE III. 79 cry through every nation in Europe, as well those who finally adhered to the papal power, as those which renounced it, as the sole re- medy for the evils of the church ; and that, too, of no narrow compass or superficial character, but such as, in the language of the time, should comprehend both the " head and members," and be applied to every point of doctrine and discipline. It is equally certain that nothing but the dread of a general rejection of his authority, cou- pled with a hope of allaying, by an appear- ance of equity, the irritation which was be- coming every day more violent, and avert- ing the impending danger, at length de- termined the "" pope, who at that time go- verned the church, (himself one of the most crafty and subtle of men,) in deference to the earnest solicitations and menacing re- monstrances of the most powerful princes of Christendom, to call a general council of the church at Trent, for the declared pur- pose of extinguishing heresies and reform- ing the church. But whoever shall review the proceedings of that servile assembly, a Paul III. 80 LECTURE III. composed for the most part of the creatures and dependents of the pope, and influenced by him in all their measures, will clearly perceive that two things only were seriously aimed at, and effectually accomplished by it ; first, the prevention of that reformation, which was the professed object of their meeting; and, secondly, the plenary con- firmation of the pope's power, wherever it was still acknowledged; although the dimi- nution of it was considered by all, who were sincerely concerned for the welfare of reli- gion ^ and as the event has fully proved, most justly considered, to be the first and most necessary step towards the removal of every corruption, and the redress of every grievance. But while the advocates of the church of Rome are constrained to admit that many evils had crept into it which needed correc- tion, they utterly deny to those who at- tempted to apply the remedy, the merit of good intention, and attribute all their ef- forts in opposition to the sovereign pontiff b Father PauPs History of the Council of Trent, p. 550. ed. 1676, Brents translation. LECTURE III. 81 to an ambitious and disobedient spirit, ex- cited to such an undertaking by the spi- ritual enemy of mankind. They will not allow the possibility of a separation from the church of Rome ever being either ne- cessary or justifiable under any circum- stances ; since, as they pretend, the promise of infallibility, exclusive salvation, and va- rious other high and inalienable privileges belong to it, so that to forsake its commu- nion, and to refuse submission to its au- thority, is nothing less than to rebel against God, to renounce Christ, and to incur a more dreadful guilt than that of the most heinous transgression of divine or human laws, from the consequences of which the combination of all moral and religious vir- tue can afford no exemption. Assuming, but not attempting to prove by reason or the evidence of fact, that their church enjoys those singular and exclusive prerogatives by the perpetual gift of God, they argue, a priori^ that in all controver- sies of religion she must be right, and all who oppose her wrong ; that although the relaxation of ecclesiastical discipline, or the G 82 LECTURE III. corruption of manners, or abuses in the temporal administration of their church, might have required correction, yet in mat- ters of faith and doctrine that she could not err ; and therefore that the protestants, in renouncing their allegiance to her on ac- count of imputed errors and corruptions of religion, were guilty of the deadly sins of heresy and schism. This is the preliminary objection to the reformation, which it was my intention to notice upon the present occasion ; not that it deserves notice from any value of its own, nor that it can be necessary to expose its fallacy to those who have the scriptures in their hands, and are permitted to read and understand them in their plain and obvious sense ; but because the groundless assump- tions on which it is founded are so charac- teristic of the general spirit of the Romish church, and prove so clearly the utter hope- lessness of internal reformation in a church so constituted, which by its own extrava- gant pretensions is tied to the defence of the grossest errors. In opposition to the schismatic conduct, as they denote it, of the LECTURE III. 88 protestant reformers, popish writers tell us of the pious boldness and holy severity with with which St. Bernard, St. Francis, and other canonized luminaries of their church, arraigned the vices of the several ages in which they lived, neither respect- ing the persons of the great and powerful, nor fearing to incur their displeasure by openly rebuking them ; who yet were never carried away by the intemperance of their zeal to attempt a separation between the head and members of the church, but were distinguished by their dutiful obedience to the apostolic see, and their exertions to promote its honour and authority. Now admitting for argument's sake, that the praises bestowed on these celebrated personages, who in times of overwhelming ignorance and gross immorality were dis- tinguished by superior piety and know- ledge, were justly merited, we may yet be permitted to ask, what were the fruits of their endeavours to reform the world, whe- ther by reproof, instruction, or example? Did they change the face of religion and morals in any one nation ? Did they in any G 2 84 LECTURE III. one region of the Christian world exter- minate the superstition by which the whole was overspread? or were they in their own persons free from its influence? or was their piety of that -pure and enlightened charac- ter, which may be considered as the legiti- mate offspring, and correct illustration of those spiritual doctrines, which our Lord and his apostles delivered to mankind? That God never so totally forsook his church, but that in the worst and dark- est ages individuals arose, who did honour to human nature, and exhibited in their lives the power of divine grace, is a truth which, as I have before remarked % we may admit in its fullest extent, without the least prejudice to the cause of the reformation, or at all strengthening the hands of its ad- versaries. Without doubt there were many such, men at least of pious minds and good in- tentions, in proportion to the measure of their knowledge ; just as in the darkest pe- riods of states and empires, we sometimes meet with individuals of exalted virtue, who c First Lecture. LECTURE III. 85 would have done honour to their best and most splendid eras. But these rare excep- tions do not at all affect the main question, which is not to be determined by solitary particulars, but by a comprehensive view of the aggregate whole. And yet even of those, whose religious virtues are so highly ex- tolled by Roman Catholics, the names are scarcely to be found in general history, so little was the state of the world influenced by them; but the monuments of their praise must be sought for the most part, in the ob- scurity and uncertainty of monastic records. The efforts, too, of their zeal were princi- pally employed in renovating the decayed discipline of preexisting religious orders, or in founding new ones ; which, indeed, was as much an object of emulation with the more fervent spirits of those ages, as the founding of new sects has been with similar characters in later times ; but the general reformation of the public religion rarely if ever entered into their contemplation. Nor was the ex- ample of the austerities which they affected'', too nearly resembling those of certain orders ^ Vide passim Butler''s Lives of the Saints. g3 86 LECTURE III. of pagan priests^ from whom it is difficult to believe that they were not originally borrow- ed, likely to make a favourable impression on the minds of men in general, or to con- tribute to the advancement of religion, the perfection of which was made to consist in such self-inflicted sufferings. For such acts of religion, if they could deserve the name, are utterly incompatible with the ordinary duties of life, the due performance of which constitutes so essential a part of true reli- gion ; and if worthy of imitation, could be imitated only in the seclusion of the clois- ter, to which, indeed, all ideas of piety in those dark ages seem to have been wholly confined. Those professed ascetics were moreover the most strenuous assertors of the pope's universal supremacy, and what- ever dogma or mandate was issued from Rome, they were ever ready to receive without question, and to propagate with the most sedulous efforts of their zeal. The members of the monastic orders were then, as they still are in whatever country ^ Barefooted Carmelites, &c. otviTrroTrohg, ;5(;a/xa»5uva<, &c. Horn. II. XVI. S35. LECTURE III. 87 they have retained their influence, or re- gained a footing, the indefatigable instru- ments of the papal power, which they make it their pride to strengthen and extend, and consider the advancement of it identified with the reputation of their fraternity, and consequently with their own individual im- portance. But none of the inveterate errors and corruptions of religion could be corrected by men bound by such ties, originating, as the worst of them did, in the express au- thority of their church, or consecrated by its sanction ; and when we farther take into the account the powerful bonds by which every member of that church is held in subjection to his spiritual chief, how much soever reason and conscience may revolt at particular doctrines or practices, it is evi- dently impossible that any one should openly dare to call them in question, till he first felt himself emancipated from that bondage ^ e The failure of the Jansenists is a decisive proof of the impossibiHty of reforming the church of Rome, while the sovereignty of the pope is acknowledged. G 4 88 LECTURE III. Reformation, therefore, must have been for ever renounced as hopeless, or it must have been undertaken and perfected in de- fiance of that power, whose interest and au- thority were directly concerned in the per- petuation of every abuse which it had once sanctioned, and which however gross it could not condemn, without at the same time renouncing its claim to infallibility, which in less enlightened ages was the pal- ladium of its strength, but is now a mill- stone round its neck. Of this we have the most conclusive evidence in the undeniable fact, that not one of the religious corrup- tions, or unscriptural doctrines, or offensive pretensions, imagined, and asserted by the pope or church of Rome in any former age, however injurious to its present interest in countries where that church is not predo- minant, has ever to this day been openly condemned or disclaimed ; and modes of worship are still retained, of which the more enlightened of those who yet observe them are evidently ashamed, and because they may not confess an error, strive to pal- liate them by sophistical explanations and LECTURE IIL 89 groundless apologies ; but are equally un- able to defend them by argument against the sober objections of sincere Christians, or the profane irony of infidels. It is al- together incredible that among the multi- tudes in different nations, which still pro- fess unalterable allegiance to the see of Rome, there should none be found, acute and enlightened in other respects as many of her most distinguished partizans have shewn themselves, who are really sensible of her gross corruptions in faith and wor- ship, and how necessary it is to the pre- servation of true religion, that these cor- ruptions should at length be removed. Yet no such sentiment is avowed, but the same debasing superstition is outwardly acqui- esced in by all alike, and no medium is al- lowed in the papal system between the un- conditional surrender of the understanding, nay, the very renunciation both of sense and reason, and the guilt of infidelity. The sole measure of right on every disputed point is the decision of the church ; her judgment must never be impugned, and to presume to look beyond it, and to appeal 90 LECTURE III. to scripture against the decrees of councils, or the judical sentence of the living occu- pant of the papal chair, would still subject the disputant who should presume so far to exceed the narrow bounds prescribed to his inquiries, to the imputation of heresy and the public condemnation of his opinions ; and in the times preceding the reformation, would have brought upon him far more formidable consequences than mere eccle- siastical censures. In fact, the papal power is still secured against all internal attempts at reformation, by the worldly minded in- difference or superstitious timidity of its adherents ; while by its own policy it has de- barred itself from the correction of abuses, however indefensible, and the adoption of improvements, however dictated by the in- crease of knowledge and the altered cir- cumstances of the world. It has taken up a position from which there is no retreat. " It is infallible, and " cannot err ; it has alone the perfect know- " ledge of the truth, and cannot be deceiv- " ed ; while all other churches have depart- " ed from it, whereinsoever they have de- LECTURE III. 91 " viated from that system of doctrine and " discipline, which that of Rome, by her " assumed right to command, requires all " Christians to receive and maintain." She is, to use her own phraseology, the mother and mistress of all churches, from which she exacts by divine appointment the im- plicit obedience of dutiful children. She solves their doubts and represses their dis- putes by her paramount authority, but does not condescend to reason with them, nor suifer any point, which has ever been set- tled by her decision to be called in ques- tion. She challenges to herself all the pro- mises of Christ to the universal church, and denies any participation of them to such Christians as are not in communion with her, although they may never have even heard her name. She asserts that the gift of the Holy Spirit, which was, according to the gracious promise of our Lord, to pre- serve and enlighten his people for ever with the saving knowledge of the truth, is exclusively hers ; and that to her alone it belongs, in consequence of this incommuni- cable privilege, to expound whatever is ob- 92 LECTURE III. scure, and to fix whatever is undefined, in all tilings relating to religion. By means of these inordinate pretensions she maintains an absolute dominion over the consciences of those, who believe her entitled to assert them ; and she can at any time silence their remonstrances, if they should presume to think any thing erro- neous in her doctrine or worship, by sim- ply offering them the alternative of silent acquiescence in what they disapprove, or excommunication ; which to the apprehen- sion of a true Roman Catholic is equiva- lent to the sentence of eternal perdition ; since nothing is more carefully instilled into their minds from early infancy, or more sedulously repeated, whenever an op- portunity can be found for recurring to it, than that impious pretension of their church, that even the merits of the death of Christ will not avail to the salvation of those who do not believe that the bishop of Rome is his vicar upon earth, and obey him accordingly. If, therefore, the reformers were not pre- pared to concede to such extravagant claims, LECTURE III. 93 separation was unavoidable. If they had conceded to them, their reformation must have ended, as all partial attempts had done before ; and they would have stood condemned by their own admission of those charges of heresy and schism, which the abettors of the papal power had heaped upon them. The unbending arrogance with which the Romish hierarchy assert their pretensions to dictate in religion to the whole Christian world, is a remarkable fea^ ture in the policy of that church, and was never more strikingly displayed, than at the crisis of the reformation ; of which, if the thing had not been from God, it appears in the highest degree probable, that the issue might have been prevented, by a small show of equity on the part of the church of Rome, from which it is evident that no se- cession was contemplated, till the violence and injustice, which were employed to ex- tinguish the first efforts towards the cor- rection of ecclesiastical abuses, had irritated those who were so harshly treated, and at the same sime convinced them that their personal safety, as well as the final success 94 LECTURE TIL of their undertaking, required a total rejec- tion of that spiritual domination, to which so many states and kingdoms had till then yielded implicit obedience. The ground of controversy was thus con- tinually widened, and animosity inflamed, by the arrogance with which it was con- ducted on the part of successive popes, who rejected with judicial blindness every con- ciliatory proceeding, and thought it more consistent with the character which they as- sumed, of vicegerents of the divine Saviour of the world and common fathers of the faithful, to arm subjects and sovereigns against each other, and to stir up nation against nation, than to reason where they had been accustomed to command, to ex- terminate, than endeavour to persuade. And if an argument was wanted at this day to convince sober and impartial men, that the honours assumed and the titles claimed by the popes could not rightfully belong to them, a simple enumeration of the atrocities instigated, abetted, and sanc- tioned by most of those who wore the triple crown successively for the first century after LECTURE III. 95 the reformation, and in many partial in- stances of much later date, for the purpose of extirpating what they call heresy, would seem to be most conclusive ; and the in- fatuation of those who still look up to them as the living representatives of that Saviour whose first advent was accompanied with the songs of angels, proclaiming ^ glory to God in the highest^ and on earth peace^ good will toward men^ and who professed of him- self, that his kingdom was not of this world, while they have the opportunity of con- trasting their actions and professions with the letter and spirit of the gospel, is to be regarded with equal astonishment and re- gret. But the impolitic violence with which the reformation was opposed cannot be im- puted to the mere offended jealousy of de- spotic power. In general, there is nothing in which the court of Rome is less deficient, than subtle refinement and dexterity in the management of its own interests, and the maintenance of its own pretensions. In many disputes with sovereigns attached to ^ Luke ii. 14. 96 LECTURE III. its communion, when it has not been able to obtain all at which it aimed, it has known how to moderate its demands, and to con- cede with a good grace, rather than risk the total loss of its authority. But in the controversies arising out of the reformation, besides the little importance which it at- tached to the persons of the reformers, men till then unknown to the world, and who might well be presumed incapable of mak- ing head against a power with which the most mighty princes in Christendom had as yet been unable to contend, without the certainty of ultimate humiliation or ruin, it was rendered more precipitate by the con- scious unsoundness of the cause which it had to defend, and dreaded much more an appeal to reason and scripture, by which the baseless foundation of its greatness might be laid open to a long deluded world, than any external shock to which it might be exposed, without touching the secret of its strength ; and a partial dismemberment of its spiritual empire was less to be dreaded, than a discussion of principles, which would have endangered the stability of the whole. LECTURE III. 97 And accordingly, when the ambassadors of some protestant princes in Germany, in deference to the wishes of the emperor Charles Vth, who hoped that the religious differences of his empire might be composed through the means of amicable conference, had repaired to the council of Trent, it was haughtily declared by the pope's legate, who presided in it, " ^ that it was not to be " suffered, that either they or any other " protestants should present their doctrine, " much less be admitted to defend it : " that it was the office of the fathers" (i. e. the agents and dependents of the pope, and deputies of popish princes and states, of whom the council was composed) " to ex- " amine their doctrine taken out of their " own books, and condemn that which did " deserve it." In this imperious and unaccommodating spirit the pretended successors of St. Peter acted towards the reformers in every coun- try; and they might well vindicate them- selves against the charge of schism, urged g Council of Trent, 338. H 98 LECTURE III. against them by their adversaries, in the words of that holy apostle and the rest to the council at Jerusalem, when they had forbidden them to speak in the name of Jesus, ^ Whether' it be ingM in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, Judge ye. Or as when the same pro- hibition was repeated, with threats in case of continued disobedience ; We ought to obey God, rather than men, and consequently to forsake the society of men who would not suffer them, according to the dictates of their own conscience, to fulfil that duty. On these grounds we may be fully satis- fied, that the separation of our church from that of Rome was originally necessary and unavoidable, unless every thing valuable in religion was to be sacrificed to avert it; and that the continuance of that separation is on the same grounds equally necessary at the present day; and so long as that church shall persist in retaining her corruptions, and refuse to see, and understand, and be converted from the error of her ways, it h Acts iv. 19. LECTURE III. 99 will be impossible that ' those who have been once enlightened, and have tasted the good word of God, should reenter her fold, with- out the abandonment of every principle, which can render the best services of a hu- man being acceptable in the sight of God. Sometimes, however, forbearing to insist upon the characteristic principles and high pretensions of their church, according to which Roman Catholics are bound to con- tend that a reformation of religion never could be necessary, and still more, that a rejection of that church, which claims an universal supremacy over the household of faith, could in no circumstances be justifi- able ; her more politic advocates will have recourse to a more plausible course of argu- ment, and insinuate that the real differ- ences between their church and ours re- spect things of comparatively small mo- ment, and such as in times of less excite- ment, and disjoined from temporal consi- derations, would not have been deemed of sufficient moment to produce such an issue; and consequently, that as those adventi- ' Hebrews vi. 4. H 2 100 LECTURE III. tious causes of alienation have now yielded to the gradual operation of time, their ef- fects should cease also, and the breach be- tween us be at length made up by a tacit ac- knowledgment of our error, and a reunion with the supreme head of the Christian world, and so the divisions healed, by which our common faith is endangered. With a policy not ill adapted to an age in which men who aspire to be wise in mat- ters of little or no moment, yet think it no reproach to be ignorant of the first prin- ciples of religion, they will remind us of various circumstances which might conduce to such a reconciliation ; " that we hold in " common with them the same apostolic " faith conceived in the same form of words, " that we use not a few of the same pray- " ers, that we retain the same apostolic form " of church government, and observe the ap- " pointed festivals of the primitive church." That these are important points of agree- ment, we can have no hesitation to admit. We rather accept it as the testimony of an adversary, thus claiming relationship with us, that in the conduct of our reformation LECTURE III. 101 we have been guilty of no rash innovations, and have indulged no blind antipathies ; that we have not changed that which stands on the ground of divine command or apo- stolic institution, to make way for fanciful improvements, or to accommodate religion either to state convenience or popular pre- judice. But, fully admitting the fidelity of this representation, we shall yet perceive, that it leaves wholly untouched the sub- stantial causes of our disunion with the church of Rome ; and consequently that it forms no argument for our return to her communion, though certainly it affords a strong one, even upon their own shewing, for them to reconsider their reasons for refusing to accede to ours. On our part, we do not charge them with having renounced any of the essential ar- ticles of Christian faith, or mutilated the form of sound words^ in which the profes- sion of it has been made in the church of God, from the earliest ages of Christianity. But we do charge them with having made such additions to the truth, and introduced, without any admissible authority, such doc- h8 102 LECTURE III. trines and modes of worship, as in a great degree to change the essential character of the Christian religion, and to render it a vehicle of darkness and superstition, instead of that, which in its native purity it ever must be, a fountain of light and truth, dif- fusing its brightness on every side, and, to- gether with the increase of knowledge, pro- gressively improving the moral state of man- kind. We charge them with teaching for doctrines the commandments of men, and exercising over the consciences of Chris- tians such a dominion as the divine Author of our religion has nowhere empowered his disciples to assume; and requiring, under pain of eternal reprobation, an implicit as- sent to many things which cannot be proved to be true, and to some which are demon- strably false and inconsistent with the let- ter and spirit of our religion. The cause of truth may be not less in- jured by addition, than by suppression ; and in the Old Testament we find the same prohibition against ^ adding to, or diminish- ing from, the commands of God. k Deut. xii. 32. LECTURE III. 103 Nearly all the corruptions which pro- testants impute to the church of Rome come from this source, from the presump- tion of adding to that which they believe already perfect; and the main difference between the two parties ultimately resolves itself into this, — that Romanists have a double rule of faith and morals, scripture and tradition, which they call the unwrit- ten word of God, while protestants acknow- ledge as such the holy scripture or written word only. By this alone protestants con- tend that every doctrine must be tried, and every article of faith established, which is enjoined upon Christians as necessary to salvation. Those of Rome, on the other hand, while they admit that tradition, or the unwritten word, must not be contrary to the written, yet claim an equal authority for it, and contend that scripture is defi- cient in many important particulars, and in others unintelligible without the help of tradition. Tradition, being thus assumed for the key of scripture, is in effect exalted above it ; and Romish ' writers, of the high- ^ Bellarmine, Milner, &c. &c. H 4 104 LECTURE III. est eminence for orthodoxy and skill in the principles of their church, have not hesi- tated to assert, that the written word of God was neither perfect nor absolutely ne- cessary, and that tradition, or the unwritten word, might have sufficed for the know- ledge and maintenance of our religion with- out it. We see, therefore, notwithstanding the agreement between the protestant episcopal church and that of Rome in the first prin- ciples of religion, a church government, there yet remains a wide difference be- tween them, concerning points of great im- portance to faith and practice. Though starting from the same goal, we proceed on diverging roads, and under the conduct of different guides. Scripture and Tradition; and it is not to be wondered that we arrive at very different conclusions. But the subject of tradition is far too important to be passed over with a brief notice. It shall therefore form the main subject of the next Lecture. Suffice it for the present to observe, that whatever may be pretended by the enemies LECTURE III. 105 of our church, or inconsiderately allowed by its ill-informed friends, concerning its resemblance to that of Rome, that resem- blance consists only in such particulars as are necessary to Christian faith, or in such institutions as are common to all apostolic churches, or in such things as are venerable by ancient usage, and conducive to piety and holiness. But here the resemblance ceases ; and those points on which we differ, are such as the church of Rome has pre- sumed to decide by her own authority alone, or that of tradition, whatever it be, without the sanction of scripture. And in support of this assertion, we have not only the evidence of legitimate deduc- tion from the writings of her most esteemed theologians, but the express declaration of her highest authority in that addition to the Apostles' Creed, which, subsequent to the reformation, she imposed, under the pain of anathema, upon all her members; and from which, if all other testimony were wanting, the necessity of that reformation might be irrefragably proved. It is difficult, indeed, to contemplate this 106 LECTURE III. prodigious monument of infatuated pre- sumption, without calling to mind the wish of Job, Oh that mme adversaries had writ- ten a book! If from the time of the reformation to the present day the church of Rome had maintained a cautious reserve, and silently corrected her most glaring abuses, it might at length have come to be doubted, whe- ther in the beginning the protestants had truth and reason on their side : but when in the plenitude of her arrogance, having escaped the first shock of the reformation, and reestablished her spiritual power more firmly than ever in those nations of Eu- rope which were then accounted most con- siderable, she put forth that supplementary exposition of her faith ; in equal contempt of reason and scripture, she gave evidence against herself of the justice of their accu- sations, which no sophistry can ever shake, no artifice elude. By this the enemies of the truth are convicted out of their own mouths, and that which was intended to add impregnable strength to the citadel of superstition, must, unless the scripture be LECTURE III. 107 indeed, as some of them have reproachfully called it, a dead letter, in time effect its subversion. Thus, we trust, has the final triumph of pure religion been prepared, through the counsels which were devised to extinguish it for ever; and the policy of those who studied to perpetuate delusion, for the pur- pose of preserving their ill-gotten and im- piously abused power over the ignorance and fear of mankind, will have turned to their own confusion. For which, and for all his spiritual mer- cies, let us bless God, "" who taketh the wise in their own craftiness^ and by his holy word "^giveth light and understanding to the simple. Amen. "■ Job V. 13. n Psalm cxix. 130. LECTURE IV. Matthew xv. 9. But in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men. We come now to that which I observed in my last Discourse to be the great head of difference between our church and that of Rome, and under which almost all other differences of substantive importance are virtually comprehended, " the authority of " tradition ;" — which Romanists elevate to an equal rank in all respects with the writ- ten word of God, while we reject it in its primary sense as apocryphal and superflu- ous ; and in its application, as a rule of faith and doctrine, superlatively pernicious. It is scarcely possible, in entering upon this subject, not to remark the near analogy between the practice of the modern church of Rome and that of the Jews, in the time of our Saviour, in respect to tradition. The Jews employed it to explain away 110 LECTURE IV. the precepts of the Mosaic law ; Roman- ists avail themselves of it, to put their own construction upon holy scripture, which they affirm to be insufficient, and in many passages unintelligible, without it. The ef- fect too of tradition, so applied, seems to have been in both cases essentially the same, that of diminishing the authority of scripture, and consequently of weakening the influence of true religion. The strong condemnation of it therefore among the Jews, by our divine Master, who knew what was in man, the weakness of his judgment and his proneness to err, ought at least to render all who profess themselves his dis- ciples very cautious of incurring a similar censure. Religion, when it presumes to venture beyond the limits which the wisdom of God has appointed, of necessity departs from the standard of truth, and degene- rates into superstition ; and human tradi- tion superadded to divine revelation, like a parasite plant, exhausts the health and vigour, and destroys the beauty, of the stem to which it has attached itself. LECTURE IV. Ill The traditions of the church of Rome, in relation to scripture, if tried by their fruits, will be found to form no exception to this rule. In the pope's Creed, presump- tuously subjoined to that of the Apostles, towards the end of the same century in which the reformation had begun, and in obedience to his mandate submissively re- ceived throughout the Romish church, the belief in tradition with good reason occu- pies the first place, inasmuch as it forms the sole basis of those corruptions of faith and worship which are imposed upon the consciences of all who still believe that the pope is the vicegerent of the Son of God on earth, and that salvation is the exclu- sive prerogative of the church which owns him for its head. The subject of tradition has indeed been pronounced by the most able divines to be replete with difficulty; and I have too much reason to apprehend that I may be cen- sured for presumption in attempting to handle it ; but yet I feel it to be of such vital importance to the right understand- ing of the whole question between our 112 LECTURE IV. church and that of Rome, that, however diffident of my ability to do it justice, I cannot, consistently with the design of these Lectures, leave it untouched. It is not, however, my intention to entangle my- self in unprofitable intricacies, or to at- tempt to unravel the sophistical subtleties with which Romanists have studied to em- barrass the argument; but to shew, as I trust, upon plain and substantial grounds, that it is our duty decidedly to reject it in its most important aspects, and where we admit it in any sense, to do so, as our church has done, with scrupulous caution and reserve. To many among the audience which I am addressing this must be a trite subject, and I fear that I have nothing to offer which may be worthy of their attention ; but, if not materially incorrect, it may have some utility for those who are less advanced in theological studies ; and if it should but have the effect of exciting their attention to a question of great, and, under existing circumstances, I may add, though without any political allusion, of growing import- LECTURE IV. 113 ance, my wishes will not be wholly disap- pointed, nor my humble endeavours in the cause of true religion altogether abortive. Now the tradition of the church of Rome is distinguished by her theologians into three several kinds, divine, apostolical, and ecclesiastical ; the first of which, the divine^ they assert to have been delivered by our Saviour himself to the apostles, but not committed to writing by them ; the second, the apostolical, that which was taught by the apostles to their converts, but is not contained in their epistles, yet in the oral communication of which they were not without the assistance of the Holy Spirit ; the third, the ecclesiastical, they define to consist of things established by the usage of the church, and constitutions, whether written or unwritten, concerning rites and ceremonies, ordinances, forms of worship and discipline ; which, though not of equal validity with the two former, they hold to be perpetually and universally binding, un- less repealed by the same authority by which they were at first enacted. The divine and apostolical, the one proceeding, 114 LECTURE IV. as it is asserted, from the immediate dic- tation of Christ himself, the other from the suggestion of the Holy Spirit, are esteemed of equal authority, both being in fact di- vine, and derived from the same origin, in ways but little differing from each other, and together constitute a rule of faith which they call the unwritten word, and to which the same deference is demanded as to the written word of God. This, therefore, is the tradition which all protestants unanimously reject, as destitute of all proof of authenticity, and on prin- ciples of reason utterly inadmissible. Ec- clesiastical traditions our church (in her thirty-fourth Article) admits under certain limitations, and in a sense materially dif- ferent from that in which the church of Rome understands them ; asserting the right of every national church to ordain, change, or abolish such things, as it may seem best, provided that all thiyigs be done to edifying. Romanists are at least consistent with themselves in asserting the insufficiency of holy Scripture ; since on no other ground LECTURE IV. 115 can the necessity of that kind of tradition on which articles of faith and doctrine are founded, with any semblance of reason or probability be maintained ; and happily for the cause of truth, many of the articles which they pretend to found upon it are such, that without further examination of its claims to our acceptation, we should be justified in rejecting it altogether, as spu- rious and unworthy of the Holy Spirit, to whose guidance and suggestion they ascribe it. But omitting for the present any par- ticular notice of these Articles, and weigh- ing according to its own merit whatever is advanced by the principal advocates of tra- dition in general, we shall find it utterly unsupported by such evidence as should induce us to receive it ; while, on the other hand, we shall clearly perceive in the whole system connected with it, and the purposes to which it is applied by the church of Rome, and even in the arguments adduced in favour of it by her most eminent contro- versialists, enough to convince us that it is our bounden duty to refuse our assent to it, and to regard it with the greatest sus- 1 2 116 LECTURE IV. picion. Most justly does our church assert % " that whatever is necessary to salvation " is contained in holy scripture," and the same was undoubtedly the sense of every branch of the universal church, before it had departed from primitive truth and sincerity. In proof of this we need not have re- course to the writings of the fathers, to ec- clesiastical history, or controversial argu- ment. An easier, and at the same time a more satisfactory decision of the point at issue, seems to lie within the reach of every man moderately instructed in the principles of his religion. The three creeds, which our truly apostolic church has wisely and dutifully retained, supply an incontro- vertible testimony, which neither party can hesitate to acknowledge. To these, therefore, our first appeal a- gainst the authority of tradition shall be made. That most venerable symbol of our faith, which we call the Apostles' Creed, not be- a Art. VI. LECTURE IV. 117 cause it was composed by the apostles, such as we now have it, but because of the apo- stolic doctrine contained in it, has undoubt- edly descended to us from very high anti- quity ; and when it was first drawn up, it cannot be doubted that it was intended to express every head of faith which was then by its authors, and the universal church which adopted it, deemed necessary to sal- vation. The Nicene Creed expresses, only in a more enlarged form, and with some- thing more of technical precision, to guard against heretical sophisms, the same pro- positions as the Apostles' Creed. And, lastly, the Athanasian, which in a later age had been deemed necessary, as a more full and specific enunciation of the same articles of belief which had been more briefly pro- fessed in the other two, to serve as an ad- ditional security against the continued at- tempts of heresy to pervert the truth, con- tains, like them, not a single article which is not proved by the authority of holy scripture, in its plain declarations, or in just and necessary inferences from them. At the several periods when these creeds I S 118 LECTURE IV. were compiled, it cannot be admitted as a possible supposition, that any thing was left untouched which was judged necessary to the completion of a true and perfect Christian faith ; nor in reality is any point of theology omitted in them, by which our religion is essentially distinguished from Ju- daism, Deism, or Paganism. It would have been utterly inconsistent with every pur- pose for which such summaries of faith are designed, to suppress any article which a Christian is bound to know and believe to his soul's health, and by a diligent atten- tion to which he can alone be preserved from those heretical fallacies by which, in all ages, the faith of believers has been as- sailed. But what room do we here find for the interference of tradition, either to vindicate or elucidate the articles of our creed, every clause of which is either expressly declared in the written word of God, or plainly de- ducible from it ? And for the more enlarged explication of what is there more concisely affirmed, the ordinary methods of teaching, such as are proper to the office of a Chris- LECTURE IV. 119 tian ministry, which appeals to that word only for the correctness of its instructions, and assumes to itself no authority above or independent of it, are abundantly sufficient, with the grace of God, without having re- course to the auxiliary sanction of an un- written revelation. If, therefore, the several articles of the ancient creeds of the church are satisfac- torily proved from scripture alone, and no extraneous testimony is required for their support, it seems necessarily to follow, that tradition is altogether superfluous in the construction and defence of a pure and apostolic faith. And, as it is inconsistent with perfect wisdom to do any thing in vain, nor do we see any similar redundancy in the economy either of nature or grace, by which a plurality of instruments is em- ployed to effect a single purpose, for which one is evidently sufficient, we are justified by these considerations, independent of its intrinsic defects, in rejecting tradition alto- gether, as a ground or criterion of faith. The next great purpose of our religion, after that of inculcating a right faith to- I 4 120 LECTURE IV. wards God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, and right notions concerning the work of our redemption by the joint operation of the three Persons in the Godhead, is to promote holiness of life, to teach men their duty towards God and each other, and by adequate sanctions to excite them to the diligent performance of it. Here, then, we have another test for ascertaining the ne- cessity, and consequently the authenticity of tradition ; since, according to our argu- ment, if not necessary, it cannot be ad- mitted for true. Again, therefore, we demand, with equal confidence, is the written word of God suf- ficient for this second purpose of genuine religion ? Do we not find in the collective volume of holy scripture the great princi- ples of every duty, whether religious, social, or personal, set forth with such perspicuity that every individual of ordinary under- standing may comprehend them, and en- forced with such sanctions that none but infidels can fail to feel their force? And, lastly, is any thing more required to give them full effect upon the minds of a Chris- LECTURE IV. m tian congregation, than that they should be diligently explained and applied to prac- tice, by the preaching and exhortation of the ministers of Christ, ordained for that very end ? To these queries it is impossible to anticipate a dissentient answer. Con- cerning the vital principles of practical re- ligion, in which all men are equally inter- ested, there is nothing obscure or ambigu- ous in the Christian code. Even infidels have professed to admire the morality of the gospel, while they have refused to hum- ble their pride to its divine authority, and have acknowledged it to be, as a discipline of life and manners, superior to the most renowned systems of heathen philosophy. And it is worthy of remark, amidst the va- riety of heterodox opinions which have in- fested the church upon almost every sub- ject concerning which it was possible to dispute, that there is no controversy be- tween serious and sober-minded Christians, concerning the true meaning of those pre- cepts of holiness and honesty which per- vade the New Testament, and the practical duties founded upon them. And those an- 122 LECTURE IV. tinomian enthusiasts who have from time to time arisen, both before and since the reformation, denying the obligations of the moral law, have never attempted to defend their anomalous impiety by the alleged in- sufficiency of scripture, or the obscurity of its precepts concerning those duties which they reject ; but by the misprision of par- ticular passages, asserting the insufficiency of that formal righteousness which the Mo- saic law required, they have taken away the moral law altogether, as no longer binding upon Christians, who are saved by grace, and not by works. Nor is such an insane abuse of scripture any objection to its sufficiency as a code of morality, to such as are willing to under- stand it ; while to those who are deter- mined to disregard its plain sense, and to wrest it to an agreement with their own preposterous conceits, it is evident that tra- dition would afford no security against er- ror; since it cannot be imagined possible that those who acknowledge the holy scrip- ture to be the written word of God, and yet presume to handle it deceitfully, should LECTURE IV. 1^3 pay more respect to an unwritten comment upon it, even if they should not deny it to possess an equal degree of authority. But though such arguments may be found among those which are advanced by Ro- manists, to prove the insufficiency of scrip- ture without tradition, we are but combat- ing shadows in attempting seriously to re- fute them. Nothing can prevent the mis- apprehensions of wilful blindness, or the aberrations of extravagant delusion. But the perfect agreement of all churches, and all sects of sincere men, concerning the great heads of moral duty, prove incontest- ably that there also, as in the case of faith, the scriptures alone are abundantly suffi- cient for the direction of believers, without the supplemental aid of tradition. The Christian life, indeed, is perfect only in pro- portion to its correspondence with the pat- tern exhibited in the New Testament ; and he will be most like his Master, who most carefully conforms to his Master's precepts, as they are there delivered. And hefe we might quit the subject, if the necessity or utility of tradition, for any true and legiti- 1£4 LECTURE IV. mate purpose of religion, was the sole ob- ject of our inquiry. For unless it is wanted as a ground of faith, or a rule of life, there is no third office for which its service can be required. But besides the necessity of tradition for the right understanding of scripture and for supplying its alleged deficiencies, for which our opponents contend, they further assert that its authority is clearly recognized in the scripture itself ; as in the Old Testa- ment where the Israelites are enjoined by ^ Moses to teach their sons and their sons' sons the mighty works of God wrought for their deliverance, that they might also learn to fear him, and not go astray after other gods ; and as when in the New, St. Paul exhorts the Corinthians *^ to keep the tradi- tions which he had delivered to them; and the Thessalonians ^to standfast, and hold the traditions ivhich they had been taught, whe- ther, as he says, by word or our epistle ; be- sides some other equally irrelevant passages, which they wrest to the same purpose, and b Deut. iv. 10. c 1 Cor. xi. 2. ^J 2 Thess. ii. 15. LECTURE IV. 125 which in fact prove nothing in their favour, but when fairly examined go entirely against them, and are only forced into the argument to give it a colour of scriptural authority ; of the whole support of which we at once deprive them, by observing that it is to written as well as unwritten tradition, that the apostle refers, and by substituting a de- finite for an indefinite term, in the ambi- guity of which the whole secret of their strength lies. The sense which in modern usage is af- fixed to the word tf^adition is that of un- written history, or at least knowledge of some kind, orally transmitted, without the aid of letters ; but the classical sense of the word, in which alone it appears to be used in the passages cited from the New Testa- ment, and in every other, unless where it is mentioned with evident disapprobation, as invalidating the commands of God, is ma- terially different, and comprehends instruc- tion of every kind, however conveyed. Ex- amples of this, both in Greek and Latin authors, must be familiar to all my hearers, and I should not have touched upon so tri- 126 LECTURE IV. vial a point of verbal criticism, if it were not for the purpose of fixing the true mean- ing of a word, which in the case before us is of the greatest importance ; since it is from the indeterminate use of it that Ro- manists endeavour to draw arguments in support of their cause, which would be wholly inapplicable to it, if that uncer- tainty were removed. Nothing can be clearer, than that St. Paul, in speaking of traditions, which he exhorts his converts to keep^ means nothing else than those in- structions which he had before given them either verbally or in writing, and not occult principles of doctrine unfit for general com- munication, but such as we still read in his several epistles ; nor can there be found in any part of the sacred volume the most dis- tant allusion to any esoteric system of doc- trines, which were neither to be committed to writing, nor freely imparted to the whole body of Christian believers, but retained for ever in the custody and at the discretion of the rulers of the church. In addition, how- ever, to the texts adduced from St. Paul, Ro- manists claim support from the concluding LECTURE IV. 127 verse of St. John's Gospel, where the evan- gelist says, that many other things also were done by our Lord, which if they were sepa- rately related, he supposes^ speaking with al- lowable hyperbole, that not even the world it- self icould contain the books that should be written. These things, therefore, omitted by the inspired writers, they would have us be- lieve to have been preserved in their tradi- tion, which must consequently be of high authority as a rule both of faith and prac- tice. But they forget, that in the close of the preceding chapter, the same evangelist had thus observed upon the same subject ; "" But many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which ai^e not recorded in this book : but these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Chi^ist, the Son of God ; and that believing ye might have life through his name; the unavoid- able inference from which appears to be, that whatever was necessary to the faith of Christians has been preserved in the writings of the divinely inspired evangelists ; and e John XX. 30, 31. 1^8 LECTURE IV. that those particulars relating to the life and actions of our Saviour which have been omitted by them, to avoid too great pro- lixity, however it might gratify a pious cu- riosity to know them minutely, were not in the judgment of the Holy Spirit of suffi- cient importance to be particularly recount- ed ; and if they have not been preserved in writing, because the grounds of faith were perfect without the knowledge of them, it is preposterous to suppose, that they have been handed down through the uncertain chan- nel of oral tradition, and that the reception of them without any evidence of their au- thority can now at length be required of all Christians, to whom the knowledge of them was not judged necessary, till it had been so ruled by the modern church of Rome. Tradition, however, in the sense which Romanists affix to it, is of such vital im- portance to their system of religion, that no point has been more laboured by them, than the maintenance of it in their acceptation of the term. Assuming, without hesitation, that the LECTURE IV. U9 tradition spoken of in the apostolic writings means the oral transmission of recondite doctrines, they have recourse to such argu- ments, independent of the little support which they imagine that they can derive from scripture, to prove the reality and ne- cessity of it, as men so expert in religious controversy would never condescend to em- ploy, if they had any thing like direct tes- timony to bring forward. ^Some of them seem to think that they have found a con- clusive analogy between their tradition and the common or unwritten law of our own country, and that the one holds the same place in relation to the written word of God, as the other does to the written or statute law of the realm ; forgetting that this unwritten law is but the natural sense of right and wrong which the Author of our being has impressed upon our minds, with its application to the unlimited variety of human actions, and the usages and deci- sions formed upon it, where the written law is silent ; whereas their tradition, if it f Milner, Part 1. Letter 10. K 130 LECTURE IV. has any real existence, comes not, like the unwritten law, to which they compare it, from the light of nature, but altogether from revelation, and is in fact itself a sub- sidiary revelation, to supply the deficiencies of another previously derived from the same source, though conveyed through different channels. ^ Others have had recourse to the senti- ments of ancient philosophers in approba- tion of this unwritten law, which from simi- lar causes must obtain in all states, as af- fording, by analogy again, a support to their tradition ; and not only are the learned sages of antiquity appealed to, but even the barbarous Druids, who communicated their most sacred mysteries by oral teaching only, and did not commit them to writing, are cited to the same effect by the ablest advo- cate of the papal cause. Yet, not relying altogether on vague analogies in support of their system, they tell us, that " ^' within a " short period after the age of the apostles " the Christian religion did flourish and pre- s Bellarmine, De Verbo Dei non Scripto. ^ Milner from Irenaeus, Letter 10. LECTURE IV. 131 " vail among nations which knew not even " the use of letters," and which must there- fore have been converted by tradition only; an argument which, however irrelevant to that which they want to prove, is not with- out its use ; since it shews, contrary to their intention, that tradition anciently meant, as we have argued, in its proper sense, in- struction^ whether oral or written, while at the same time it is evident that the former was the only kind of instruction, which men unacquainted with letters were capa- ble of receiving. Under the same deno- mination however, preaching, catechising, and nearly every other kind of instruction used at this day in our own church, except the reading of the holy scripture and the use of written forms, might with equal pro- priety be comprehended : and it is well known, that all true protestants, while they allow no other authority than that of holy scripture for the establishment of doctrines, lay at least as much stress on the oral ex- planation of doctrines so established as ever the church of Rome has done; and without doubt this legitimate kind of tradition is, K 2 ISS LECTURE IV. and ever will be, necessary to the increase and preservation of religion ; nor can the mere diffusion of the scriptures without it ever be expected by reasonable men to con- vert sinners to repentance and infidels to the faith. The aid of a Christian ministry to instruct, rebuke, exhort, must in all ages and in every state of civilization be indis- pensable to the maintenance of religion; and when we call to mind that in the first ages, before the discovery of printing, the multiplication of books was slow, difficult, and expensive, and that in all probability there were not to be found within the com- pass of the Christian world as many copies of the Bible as are at this time contained in this seat of learning, it is evident that religious knowledge must have been propa- gated almost exclusively by oral tradition, in the sense which we have affixed to the word ; but this by no means sets tradition on the same level with holy scripture, nor supposes the existence of such a tradition as Romanists contend for, either concur- rent with scripture, or independent of it. The true tradition of the primitive ages LECTURE IV. 188 was the unfolding of the truths of scrip- ture by those who were ordained to the office of instructing the people in religion ; and the correctness and propriety of it was to be estimated by its congruity with scrip- ture, which it was employed to elucidate and explain ; and, instead of judging scrip- ture by oral tradition, the latter could only be used as an auxiliary to scripture, and al- together subordinate to it. But such a tradition would not at all serve the purposes of the modern church of Rome ; and therefore, while they presume to assert that the holy scripture is not by itself a perfect rule of faith, but must be so taken in conjunction with tradition, they contend also that this tradition, without which, according to their principles, a true faith cannot be established, should not be made public, but reserved in the power of the church, that is, of the priesthood, for which they scruple not to assign this most extraordinary reason, "4est it should be- " come as well known to heretics, Jews, and i Bellarmine, De Verbo Dei non Scripto. K 3 134 LECTURE IV. " pagans, as to the highest orders among " themselves ;" as if it was agreeable to the will of God, who calls all men to salvation through faith, that the ground of this in- dispensable faith should be inaccessible, ex- cept to a favoured few, and such others as they may think proper to admit to it. Our blessed Lord's commission to his apostles was, to preach the gospel to every creature^ the reward and the penalty being annexed, he that believeth and is baptized shall be saved, and he that believeth not shall be damned; and if the Romanists really hold that tradition is necessary to faith, as they must acknowledge that faith is necessary to salvation, they cannot but admit, that by keeping it secret their church is guilty of shutting the gates of eternal life against those who, by their common Lord, are called to enter in. But such an intention abstract- edly we lay not to their charge. We doubt not that conscientious Romanists, as well as ourselves, are desirous that all men should be saved, and in them we impute it only to the blindness of irrational superstition, whatever our judgment may be concerning LECTURE IV. 135 those who are more profoundly instructed in their mysteries, that they exclude from the promises of the gospel such as disallow the sovereign power of their church, and doubt the authority of its head to lock and unlock the gates of mercy to whom he will. The truth is, that dominion over the minds of men is the great object of the church of Rome ; and its rulers have found that the fiction of a divine tradition which they ne- ver divulge, but which they assert to be in their hands a certain guide to salvation, gives them an enormous influence over or- dinary minds, and a firm hold even upon the strongest, into which the belief of it has been sedulously infused from infancy among the first principles of religion. Their tra- dition in fact serves them for a witness ever ready to attest whatever they want to prove, but not liable to a counter-examina- tion, by which the real value of its testi- mony might be ascertained: it is heard only, but never seen ; and by this dexterous management it has been made as efficacious an engine of spiritual power to papal Rome, as the Sibylline books were of state policy K 4 136 LECTURE IV. to her pagan prototype : like them, it can be adapted to all exigencies, and silence every doubt ; so long at least as those who willingly acquiesce in palpable delusion shall by indolent credulity support its pre- tensions ; as soon as its foundations are ex- amined, it must vanish into air. If the reformation had established but this single point, " that all controversies of " faith and doctrine should be decided by " an appeal to scripture only," even that would have been an inestimable service to religion, the knowledge of which was be- fore to be sought in the voluminous works of the fathers, and the decrees of councils, instead of the sacred book of God's word, and in a manner lay buried under the ever increasing piles of scholastic divinity. And as it is said of Socrates that he call- ed down philosophy from the clouds, and made it to dwell in the abodes of men, so did the leaders of the reformation, by turn- ing away the study of religion from idle subtleties to the pious examination of holy scripture, familiarize men's minds with those immutable truths which are the foundation LECTURE IV. 137 of sincere faith, and prepare them for the spiritual worship of God which their reli- gion requires, instead of the gaudy pomps and unedifying ceremonies in which a cor- rupt church had made so large a part of it to consist. The benefits which protestants have de- rived from the free use of scripture, though, hke the other good gifts of God, sometimes misapplied, and sometimes grievously abus- ed, are great beyond all estimation, whe- ther we regard their temporal or spiritual state. Familiar access to the fountain of living waters has given a new impulse and a right direction to the mind, and has banished the long train of noxious delusions, by which religion was before disfigured ; while those who have rejected the reformation are scarcely advanced beyond the point at which that event found them. And al- though the upbraiding example of protest- ants has in a manner compelled the rulers of the church of Rome apparently to relax something of their prohibitory zeal against scriptural knowledge, they have yet found 138 LECTURE IV. means to render it unproductive of its pro- per fruit, by forbidding those who are in- dulged with a permission to read the dis- courses of our Lord, and the doctrine of his inspired apostles, to understand what they read in any other sense than that which their church has set upon it ; and thus tra- dition still holds its preeminence in their practical application of it, as the paramount rule of faith and interpreter of scripture. And unless it shall please God, in his great mercy, to open their eyes, and to inspire them with a sincere desire to discern and embrace the truth, tradition must for ever retain its supremacy ; for their systematized corruptions of faith and doctrine and wor- ship cannot be maintained without it. In this respect there is a striking ana- logy between Roman Catholics and the sect which has assumed the appellation of Uni- tarians. The former, having adopted and engrafted upon Christianity a mass of in- congruous superstitions, which, either ex- pressly or by necessary inference, are con- demned in scripture, and being determined not to abandon them, have called in the LECTURE IV. 139 assistance of tradition to defend their mani- fold adulterations of Christian truth ; while the Unitarians, rejecting the Christian faith, but insidiously retaining the Christian name, and being sensible that the scheme of reli- gion which they have devised for them- selves was utterly untenable on scriptural grounds, not many years since adopted the bold expedient of making a new translation of scripture, adapted to their own principles, upon a plan which sets at nought all the rules of criticism as well as the laws of common honesty ; by this expedient making it speak the language of their tradition, which, after the example of the Romanists, they have thus effectually placed above it. I mean not, however, to insinuate against Romanists the guilt of equal impiety with men who have abjured the essentials of Christian faith, but to mark how a similar necessity has led in both cases, though in diiFerent ways, to a similar result. The Uni- tarian, with sacrilegious boldness, cuts down holy scripture to the measure of his own negative creed : the Romanist impairs its authority by teaching ^or doctrines the corn- 140 LECTURE IV. mandments of men ; and, like the Unitarian, he has no other alternative, but to forsake errors which can no longer be defended by sincere and enlightened men, and render his religion conformable to scripture, or, after the manner of his church, to weaken the force of scripture against it by attribut- ing equal and practically greater authority to an unwritten revelation, of the authenti- city of which no credible evidence nor pro- bable argument can be produced. But tra- dition and the church of Rome are indis- solubly linked together : tradition is the sole foundation for all her usurpations over the Christian world, the sole authority for all her innovations on primitive faith and worship. Even the supremacy of the pope, as derived by his asserted succession from St. Peter — a matter of small moment to pro- testants, but which, from the consequences which Romanists draw from it, ought to be as clear as any fact recorded in sacred his- tory — depends wholly on tradition, mixed up too with the ^ grossest fables, and having ^ Vide Cave's History of Christ and his Apostles. Life of St. Peter. LECTURE IV. 141 such a weight of negative testimony from scripture against it, that, as a distinguished ^ prelate of our church justly argues, " we " must either renounce the opinion," (i. e. that St. Peter was the founder of the church of Rome,) " or let scripture give way to tra- « dition." And yet on no better foundation than this pretended succession does the pope ar- rogate to himself, and his adherents ascribe to him, honours little less than divine, and powers which, unless gifted with infallibi- lity — a prerogative indeed which they also claim for him, though not quite agreed among themselves on that point — no hu- man being can be competent to exercise. But again, according to the invariable pretension of the church of Rome, as it has been already observed, there is no salvation out of her pale; and this with true Roman- ists is not merely a speculative opinion, but a necessary article of faith. It ought, there- fore, to be as capable of demonstration as any article of the Apostles' Creed, since ^ Marsh, Comparative View of Church of England and Church of Rome. U2 LECTURE IV. whoever for want of such demonstration re- fuses assent to it, must, upon their prin- ciples, be forthwith in a state of reproba- tion. And yet, if we search the scriptures throughout for any proof of it, we shall neither be able to discover it in any ex- press declaration of our Lord himself, nor in any of the apostolical Epistles ; whether addressed to particular churches or gene- rally to the whole body of Christians ; nor in any probable inference from any thing asserted by them, nor in any analogy to the known dispensations of God. Instead of such proofs from scripture, we are referred to a few obscure and ambi- guous texts, arbitrarily explained in a sense inconsistent with the general tenor of the sacred volume, and scarcely appearing to have any affinity to that which they are al- leged to prove. And yet on these scanty and disputable grounds of scripture, so far as scripture is relied upon, the most im- portant of their pretensions are founded; as, for instance, that St. Peter had not merely a precedence among the apostles by age or personal character, but that he was, in the LECTURE IV. 143 sense of real sovereignty, prince of the apo- stles; and without the smallest pretence of scriptural authority they assert that he founded the see of Rome, and was himself the first pope ; and, what is still more ex- traordinary, that the powers which they at- tribute to St. Peter have descended with undiminished right to all his successors the popes, and are to continue with them to the end of time. That the support to be found in scripture, by any mode of inter- pretation, was too slender to sustain the hundredth part of the system establish- ed by the church of Rome, is self-evident : to supply the deficiency, therefore, recourse is again had to the never-failing help of tra- dition ; and it is on that alone that the in- admissible pretensions of the sovereign pon- tiff are founded. In virtue of these pre- tensions, resting on tradition, many of the worst corruptions of the church of Rome, and against which the reformers had zeal- ously contended, were embodied into ar- ticles of belief, and imposed on all its mem- bers as necessary to salvation by the reign- ing pope, at the conclusion of that council 144 LECTURE IV. which had been called to heal the wounds of religion, by redressing wrongs and re- moving the corruptions of the church. Many of these, which are referred to apo- stolical tradition, are of such a nature, that, as I observed in the former part of this Lecture, they would be alone sufficient to justify us in rejecting as altogether spu- rious, and unworthy of the Holy Spirit, any tradition to which such consequences could be attributed. And as these articles still retain their place in the creed of the Romish church, and are declared to be necessary to salva- tion by her supreme authority, some of the most obnoxious of them shall be particu- larly examined in the ensuing Lectures, commencing with Transubstantiation ; and the result, I trust, will be an additional confirmation of that which it is my object to prove by unexceptionable evidence, " that " on religious grounds the reformation was " absolutely necessary ; and that if it had " not taken place at a former period, it " must have been effected now ;" and that separation from a church whose system of LECTURE IV. 145 religion is so manifestly corrupt, as that of the church of Rome is even at this day, is the indispensable duty of every man who in singleness of heai^t fears God, and hopes for salvation through the alone merits and mediation of his Redeemer. Amen. LECTURE V. John iv. 24. God is a spirit; and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth. It is an old complaint with Roman Ca- tholics, that protestants are ever fond of applying this text to them. But in this at least we do not act the part of enemies, and much is it to be wished, that, laying aside prejudice and party spirit, they would be persuaded to apply it to themselves ; that they would seriously consider the import of the words, the authority of the speaker, and the comprehensive application of the prin- ciple which is here laid down by him as an indefeasible characteristic of his religion ; and that they would remember how incum- bent it is upon them and all Christians to try both their faith and worship by this rule of their divine Master, if they hope to render their service acceptable to God the L 2 148 LECTURE V. Father, who has given us these instructions by the ministry of his Son. Apparently, however, forgetting the obli- gation of conforming to his precepts, it seems to have been the principal object of the church of Rome, in the multitude of showy ceremonies with which she has en- cumbered her ritual, to strike the senses and captivate the imagination, deviating in a remarkable manner from the chaste sim- plicity of the gospel, and, if I may be al- lowed the expression, materializing the Christian religion. Whether the popish doctrine of transub- stantiation, to the discussion of which I now proceed, in pursuance of the design announced at the close of my last Lecture upon the subject of tradition, may not be referable in its origin to this fondness for exhibiting spiritual truths under visible forms to the admiration of an ignorant peo- ple, may possibly be not altogether a use- less subject of speculation. Certain, at least, it is, that there are in the institutions of that church other instances of a similar propensity to subject things of a purely LECTURE V. 149 spiritual nature to a grossness of interpret- ation, by which, if their power of impress- ing the senses is increased, their effect on the mind is proportionably diminished. But whatever the origin of the doctrine of transubstantiation may be, whether it proceeded at the first from ignorance, su- perstition, or interested craftiness, it is now, with all its monstrous consequences, ele- vated by the church of Rome to the high- est rank among the articles of her faith ; and although the genuine progeny of tra- dition, yet, in defending it against the ob- jections of protestants, they would fain ap- pear to place their whole reliance on the support of scripture. According to their own principle, con- firmed, as it has been, by successive popes and councils, guarded by the most terrible anathemas against all who may presume to impugn it, and the belief of it exacted of every member of that church at the peril of his soul, no man can be an honest Ro- man Catholic who entertains a doubt con- cerning it. If sense and reason should re- volt against it, he must reject their remon- 1.3 150 LECTURE V. strances as heretical, and assent to the in- fallible guide which assures him of its truth, in defiance of the testimony of both ; and when this absolute victory has been gained over a pious and diffident mind, no limits can be set to its credulity and submission. The debasement of the understanding, thus effected, is the essential principle of the well-compacted superstition of the church of Rome, and the chief source of the amazing influence which her priest- hood possess over the very highest, and, as we should suppose, the most enlightened of her laity. When once, indeed, the mind of any sincere and unsuspecting man has been so scared out of its self-possession by spiritual terrors, or so bewildered by sophistry or overcome by plausible artifice, as to yield assent to propositions so monstrous as those which are asserted by Roman Catholic di- vines concerning the sacramental myste- ries of the Lord's supper, what thenceforth can such an one refuse to admit for truth which the same spiritual guides, on whose authority he builds implicit faith, declare LECTURE V. 151 to be both true and necessary for salva- tion ? But, if the power of the church of Rome seem to be consolidated by the absolute surrender of the understanding, which is necessary to the belief of this doctrine of transubstantiation, we shall find, on a nearer view, that it is a source of weakness also, and yet that her very existence depends upon maintaining it. Of this Romish writers are themselves most evidently sensible: they have therefore, as the occasion appeared to require, exhausted the force of declamation and the subtleties of elaborate sophistry in their endeavours to defend it ; well know- ing that not merely the maintenance of one single article of their creed, but the infalli- bility which they claim for their church, and its continued ascendancy over the minds of men, are staked upon the issue ; that what they profess to consider as the most sacred part of their worship, and endeavour to screen from inspection, and to render most awful to timid credulity by the high- sounding phrases v;hich they apply to it, must be abolished, and that a general re- formation can no longer be delayed when L 4 152 LECTURE V. this outwork of their system can no longer be defended. In the mean time it is a source of real weakness which cannot be disguised by any palliatives, unless to those who are wilfully blind; and whatever efforts may be em- ployed to sustain the credit of so palpable a fiction, it must, in God's good time, fall be- fore the united power of reason and scrip- ture, and draw after it the dissolution of that fabric of error which is so intimately blended with it. In men of corrupt lives and worldly minds, the eyes may be closed against the light, and the heart hardened against the impression of truth ; but with such as are truly pious, and sincerely desirous both to know and to do the will of God, as we doubt not that many members of that church are, it would argue a distrust of the divine goodness, if we were to despair of the final prevalence of truth, notwithstand- ing the prejudices of education, and the obstacles arrayed against it by the policy of those who have an interest in opposing its progress. Truth alone is eternal, delusion can have LECTURE V. 153 but a limited duration. The sunshine of divine revelation must by degrees make its way into the darkest recesses ; and when men are required to believe incredible things, without any warrant from God's word, upon the testimony of pretended tra- dition, or the mere dictation of an unin- spired mortal like themselves, reason will not for ever submit to authority so arro- gantly abused ; but those who do not think it a sufficient reason of their faith, and the hope that is in them, to believe implicitly whatever " the church believes," will at length presume to ask the "Jewish how^^' as it is artfully stigmatized by one who well knew the danger of all inquiry to the sys- tem which he had devoted his utmost ener- gies and unquestionably powerful talents to defend, in all its bearings, concerning the possibility of things which they are commanded to receive as truths necessary to salvation, with none of the visible cha- racters of truth about them. The controversies concerning transub- ^ Milner, End of Religious Controversy, part III. Letter 38. 154 LECTURE V. stantiation, which at earlier periods since the reformation were carried on between the advocates of the church of Rome and protestants, have filled volumes without pro- ducing any decisive result on the minds of those who had previously taken their ground on the opposite sides of the question : the one party being able to make no concession consistently with truth, and the other being bound to defend to the utmost whatever popes and councils had decreed, or to con- fess error and surrender the claim to infal- libility, on which the whole of their spiritual power is built. And, so long as an appear- ance of argument can be maintained by quibbling upon words, they may persevere in their endeavours to perplex and con- found what is naturally simple and perspi- cuous, and seem to the ignorant and cre- dulous to say a great deal ; while in fact, if their intricacies are unravelled, and their lofty diction subjected to the test of reason and common sense, there will be nothing found in them but emptiness and fallacy, and their last stand must be made on tra- dition alone. LECTURE V. 155 I should be guilty of great presumption if I were to suppose myself capable of add- ing any thing to the force of argument ad- duced by so many of the most eminent pro- testant divines, who have gone deeply into the question against this chimerical fic- tion. My object in regard to this, as well as other glaring errors of the church of Rome, is, not to entangle myself in the labyrinths of false reasoning, which they have devised for the purpose of obscuring the truth, but merely to exhibit such reasons for rejecting them as are obvious to plain understand- ings, and at the same time of sufficient weight to determine all men, who believe that their salvation depends upon the sin- cerity of their faith, to separate themselves from her communion, and, by necessary consequence, to justify the reformation ; the end and object of which was to restore the purity of religion, and to remove the errors and corruptions by which both faith and worship were vitiated and disfigured. In the interpretation of the words of our Lord, in the institution of the sacrament of 156 LECTURE V. his body and blood at his last supper, the church of Rome contends for the literal sense, in support of her doctrine of tran- substantiation, ours for the spiritual. They assert that when he brake and gave the bread to his disciples, after that he had blessed it, saying these words, Take^ eat, this is my body, the bread was actually con- verted into the true substance of his body. And in like manner when after supper he gave them the cup, saying. Drink ye all of it, for this is my blood of the new testa- ment, which is shed for many for the i^emis- sion of sins, that the wine was in like man- ner converted into the real blood of the divine Redeemer. This being assumed, and it being admitted by all Christians, that the holy rite then instituted by our Saviour was intended to be perpetual, they go on to assert, that as often as the consecration of the appointed elements of bread and wine is performed by the priest repeating the words of Christ, the same wonderful conversion equally takes place ; and fur- thermore, as they have thought proper, ap- parently for the purpose of exalting the LECTURE V. 157 dignity of the priesthood, to deny the cup to the laity, in order to justify this mutila- tion of the sacrament, they require it to be believed that the consecrated wafer alone, without the wine, which our Lord had de- clared to be the new testament in his blood, contains the " body, blood, soul, and di- " vinity of aur Lord Jesus Christ;" that the Lamb of God is thus offered up to his hea- venly Father day by day, a bloodless sacri- fice for the living and the dead, being im- molated by the word of the priest, which mystically separates the body from the blood, instead of the sword ; and that being laid upon the altar under the form of bread, lifted up, and carried about in pro- cessions, he is to be worshipped under that appearance, with the same profound adora- tion as if the heavens were opened, and we saw him standing at the right hand of God : in a word, that the eternal Son of God, who is one with the Father and the Holy Ghost in all the attributes of the Godhead, is made visible to the eyes, handled by the hands, masticated and eaten by his worshippers, under the form of bread, as often as they 158 LECTURE V. celebrate the eucharist according to the usage of the church of Rome. There is a repulsive grossness in this doctrine, equally offensive to faith and rea- son. In a matter, however, of so sacred a nature, while we firmly protest against er- rors and corruptions, it is our duty to guard against all appearance of irreverence, and not to wound intentionally the right feel- ings of those whose piety entitles them to respect, while we lament their delusion and feel ourselves bound to refute their mis- conceptions. In attempting, therefore, to state their case, I take nothing from the invectives of opponents, but have drawn exclusively from their own sources, in addition to prescribed formularies, relying upon the authority of writers'" in the highest estimation among themselves ; and without doubt, to Chris- tians who have derived the knowledge of their religion from authentic sources, and have studied with competent abilities and impartial sincerity the holy scriptures, which ^ Bossuet, Milner, Butler, &c. LECTURE V. 159 are alone able to make us wise unto salva- tion, a simple exposition must be the most effectual refutation of such palpable per- versions of truth ; in which, at the same time, the latent seeds of the most hurtful errors in faith, doctrine, and worship, are contained. But, indeed, if we consider the kind of arguments with which Romanists endea- vour to recommend the belief of tran sub- stantiation, we shall be still more strongly impressed with the conviction of its being utterly untenable, and shall wonder how sober-minded men, unless in ages of pro- found ignorance, which is the natural pa- rent of superstition, could ever be induced to receive it. We are assured, by the most distinguished among the "" advocates of this doctrine, that the conversion of the consecrated elements of bread and wine into the body and blood of Christ, " by which he is received whole " and entire at the same time, by so many " people, in so many different places, is a c Bossuet, Var. of Prot. vol. i. p. 426. 160 LECTURE V " miracle equal to the greatest and most " incomprehensible wrought by the power " of God ;" a position which we may admit without danger to the cause of the reform- ation, provided that the reality of it be first proved. But how is this to be done ? They tell us that this perpetual miracle, this greatest of all miracles, " ^ by which all the other " miracles which God has wrought for our " salvation are confirmed," is imperceptible to our senses and incomprehensible to our reason ; so that, according to their own showing, the greatness as well as the re- ality of this highly extolled miracle de- pends altogether upon the willing credu- lity of those to whom it is proposed, and is utterly incredible till men have consented to divest themselves of sense and reason, and to forego the use of those faculties which the Almighty has graciously bestow- ed upon us, for the very purpose of en- abling us, as in all other things, so in reli- gion, to discern truth from falsehood, and good from evil. d Bossuet, Var. of Prot. vol. i. p. 426. LECTURE V. 161 All verbal subtleties in defence of such a doctrine are unworthy of serious notice ; and it is as vain to argue upon a subject in which the exercise of sense and reason is proscribed, as to dispute concerning the natures and institutions of another planet ; and we should be justified in refusing at once to believe what is imposed upon us in a manner so inconsistent with the whole course of providence and grace, if no other argument were brought against it. But the defenders of transubstantiation are not content with placing their whole reliance on passive credulity. They endeavour to add credibility to it, by the analogy which they pretend to have found between it and some of the mi- racles recorded in the Old and New Testa- ment ; as the change of Moses's rod into a serpent, and again into its primitive form of a rod, the substance still continuing the same ; the turning of water into blood among the plagues of Egypt, and again wa- ter into wine, as at the marriage feast in Cana of Galilee ; and they contend that it is not more difficult for Omnipotence to M 162 LECTURE V. change the elements of bread and wine in the eucharist into the real body and blood of the Son of God, than to effect these and other miracles recorded in scripture, and still less than the creation of the world out of nothing; and therefore, that when qur Lord declared at his last supper, that the bread which he brake and blessed, and gave to his disciples, was his body, and the wine his blood, to doubt that the effect followed his words, and still continues to follow each successive repetition of them by the priest in the consecration prayer, is to doubt his veracity or his power, on which they found a charge of heinous impiety against pro- testants. This, however, is but an artifice, and a very shallow one, to divert attention from the real point at issue between us and them. We hold, as truly and unequivocally as they do, the divine omnipotence of the Re- deemer, and his coequality with the Father and the Holy Ghost in all the attributes of the Deity. But the question here is not concerning his omnipotence, what it can do, but what LECTURE V. 163 in reality it does ; and nothing can well be imagined more monstrous in absurdity, or more audacious in impiety, than thus to contend that the promise of Christ has not been fulfilled, unless it has been fulfilled in its literal import, as they will have it, though reason and common sense and the context of scripture are unequivocally a- gainst them ; and it is truly amazing to hear them arguing, '"" that it w^as easier for " the Son of God to force the laws of na- " ture, in order to verify his words, than " for us to accommodate our understand- " ing to violent interpretations, which over- " turn all the laws of speech ;" whereas these violent interpretations consist only in receiving in a figurative sense what they are determined to take in the literal, for the sake of establishing what they call the real presence of Christ under the species of bread and wine. Very different were the miracles of our Lord upon earth from this pretended mi- racle of the popish eucharist. The evident e Bossuet, Exposition of Catholic Doctrine, p. 61. M 2 164 LECTURE V. design of his miracles was through the senses to impress the mind, and to induce those who were witnesses of them, to be- lieve that he came from God, by the evi- dence which they afforded, that the power of God was among them ; and accordingly when he upbraided the cities of Judah, in which most of his mighty works had been done, for their unbelief^, and again when to those who believed not his word, he ap- pealed to the evidence of his works^, in both cases we see equally the purpose of mi- racles ; that they were designed for a testi- mony to the beholders of the presence of divine power, in the person by whom they were wrought ; in order to which it was ne- cessary that they should be perceptible to the outward senses, and not, hke the pre- tended miracle of transubstantiation, indis- cernible, even to those who most zealously profess to believe it. But in the particular cases which themselves allege, as in the turning of water into wine, and the crea- tion of the world out of nothing, and the f John X. 37, 38. S John xiv. 11. LECTURE V. 165 same might be said of every other scripture miracle, instead of helping their cause, the argument is decisively against them. For there the effect followed the word; he spake and it was done; and even unbelievers, who conspired the destruction of our Lord, could not deny that ^ many miracles ivere done hy him. The same power continued to the apo- stles contributed mightily to the growth of Christianity: ' They went forth, and preached every where, the Lord working with them, and confirmiyig their word with signs follow- ing; which men saw, and therefore believed. But an imperceptible miracle, in things na- turally amenable to our senses, is little less than a contradiction in terms ; and if such had been the character of the scripture mi- racles, instead of convincing unbelievers, all reasonable men would have deemed such vain pretences a sufficient cause for discre- diting any doctrine, which they might have been adduced to support. But again, in addition to the forced and fanciful analogies which the defenders of h John xi. 47. ' Mark xvi. 20, M 3 166 LECTURE V. transubstantiation borrow from the Old and New Testament in support of their cause, an attempt is made to force into the same service, even philosophy and experience, unmanageable auxiliaries, it should seem, in a case where all inquiry is forbidden ; and the ''possibility that our senses may sometimes be deceived, is cited as a reason for believing that they are deceived, or at least that their testimony is less to be cre- dited, than the tradition of an infallible church ; which, however, without disparage- ment of its infallibility, has condemned the authors of some of the most splendid dis- coveries in science, and by which the most exalted views of the wisdom, power, and goodness of the Deity are exhibited to the pious mind, as guilty of pernicious errors. In a word, nothing which could wear the appearance of an argument to confound the ignorant and perplex the superficial, has been omitted by popish divines, in their at- tempts to establish this delusion ; which, as themselves avow, and the reason of the ^ Milner, Part III, p= 59, 60. LECTURE V. 167 thing proves, cannot be done away, without the dissolution of the whole fabric esta- blished upon it. For, on no other founda- tion than this asserted miracle of transub- stantiation, the pretended sacrifice of the mass, the mutilation of the sacrament by taking away the cup from the laity, their doctrine of the real (or corporeal) presence, the homage of the most profound adora- tion paid to the consecrated wafer, as if re- ally and substantially converted into the body, blood, soul, and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, as it is asserted in the supple- mentary papal creed, can possibly be justi- fied, nor can it be surrendered to the force of reason and scripture, without tacitly ad- mitting a grossness of faith and worship in that infallible church, to which paganism alone could furnish a parallel. It is not therefore matter of surprise, when we see men of great learning and equal acuteness, and eminently wise in their generation, as many of its defenders have been, pertinaciously contending for it; while at the same time the futile weakness of all which they have been able to advance in its M 4 168 LECTURE V. support, compared with their general abi- lity, and the strong interest by which their utmost efforts are called forth, is almost conclusive against the cause which they have laboured to maintain, and justifies the confident assurance, that no weapon formed against the t7mth shall ultimately prevail. They have not however confined them- selves to a system of self-defence, but have shewn an eagerness in attacking the tenets of their adversaries, which seems rather to imply a conscious inability to justify their own, than a real persuasion of their in- trinsic soundness ; so that in the most cele- brated expositions of Roman Catholic doc- trine on this head, nearly as much space is occupied by controversial matter, as that which is properly didactic and explanatory ; and the differences of doctrine concerning the eucharist, which existed in the earlier days of the reformation between the dif- ferent reformed churches, are cited with much affectation of triumph, as a proof that all were in error, and given up to a mind void of judgment, as soon as ever they had withdrawn from the church of Rome, and LECTURE V. 169 presumed to study the scripture in prefer- ence to obeying her decrees. But though we admit that there were many shades of difference between the reformers in their doctrine of the sacrament, and serious er- rors in some of them, this neither militates against the reformation in general, nor ca- nonizes the errors of the church of Rome. On the contrary, I would rather ascribe those original variations of the reformers, according to the principle with which I set out in the commencement of these Lec- tures, to the gracious purpose of divine Pro- vidence, to w^iden the basis and strengthen the foundations of the reformation, by awakening attention, and bringing into dis- cussion almost every principle of Christian doctrine, among which that of the sacrament of the Lord's supper must by all parties be admitted to be one of the most important. With men who are not tied to a pretended infallibility. Christian charity must allow, that in things w^hich are not precisely defin- ed in scripture, nor simply discoverable by human reason, it is possible for individuals of competent knowledge and the greatest 170 LECTURE V. piety to disagree in some slight modifica- tions of opinion ; and in regard to the sub- ject of our present inquiry, it is certain that even in those doctrines of the early reformers concerning the sacrament, which we should least approve, there is nothing inconsistent with good intentions and sin- cere faith, even if we take the representa- tions of their adversaries, who were anxious to exhibit them in the least favourable point of view. It is also certain, that the differences which did exist among them may be accounted for in ways which reflect no discredit upon any party. Even those who were themselves the in- struments for restoring to the Christian world the exercise of the understanding and liberty of conscience, which are essen- tial to true religion, were not all at once emancipated from the thraldom of ages. The work was necessarily progressive. Those corruptions of faith, doctrine, and worship, which are self-evident, and utterly indefensible, were forthwith condemned and renounced, as soon as the papal dominion was overthrown. The removal of such as LECTURE V. 171 were less obvious was not undertaken, till increasing knowledge had more clearly de- monstrated their erroneous character ; and in our own church, at least, no step was taken towards the correction of error, with- out that pious caution, which in departing from one extreme, guards against the danger of falling into another. All knowledge, ex- cept that which comes by inspiration, which we claim not for our reformers, must be partial and gradual ; and it is not a ground of censure, but a title to praise, that in the zeal of doing good, they did not forget the dictates of prudence and Christian humi- lity. With whom the doctrine of transubstan- tiation originated is a disputed point of no real moment. It is however certain that it was first imposed on the belief of Chris- tians, in that dark period which followed the irruption of the barbarous nations and the downfall of the empire ; when learning was extinguished, and the states of modern Europe, as yet imperfectly formed out of the broken members of that mighty ruin, were sunk in ignorance and superstition ; 172 LECTURE V, when the holy scriptures were almost un- known, and whatever the priesthood, in obedience to the mandate of the pope, the foundations of whose power were laid in those ages of darkness, declared to be an article of faith, was received without contra- diction by a gross and unreasoning people. And this tenet of transubstantiation, which added so largely to the influence of the sacerdotal order had been so diligently inculcated upon all minds, and was render- ed so familiar by the daily services founded upon it, that many of those who at the dawn of the reformation were most clearly sensible of the corruptions of the church of Rome, in other important points of faith and worship, seem hardly at first to have suspected error in this, which is the fertile source of so many others ; and when, at length, by the more careful study of holy scripture, they came to be convinced that the papal doctrine was erroneous, they halted in their conclusions, and reluctantly abandoned the creed of their infancy, in proportion as diligent investigation and in- creasing knowledge convinced them, that LECTURE V. 173 it was founded in delusion, or misconcep- tion of the truth. Such was especially the case of our own Cranmer, who, from having been a vehement assertor of transubstan- tiation, at length laid down his life in con- tending against it And this, in the judg- ment of every candid mind, must be a con- vincing proof, that instead of bold and li- centious innovators in religion, as the pa- pal writers with one accord have represent- ed them, the great leaders of the reform- ation were men of sincere piety and tender consciences, and proceeded in the work which they had undertaken, with that cau- tious moderation which its infinite import- ance demanded. There is, therefore, no cause for exultation to the adversaries of the reformation in the discrepancies of its early advocates, concerning the true doc- trine of the eucharist ; and least of all does it afford any justification for cherishing their palpable error, because some of those who rejected it still lingered in too near an approximation to it, or failed to express their own sentiments with sufficient clear- ness against it. 174 LECTURE V. They may refute the consubstantiation of Luther with the same arguments as their own transubstantiation is refuted, without adding any strength to their own cause; nor yet will they be able to shew, erroneous as it is, that his doctrine has ever been ap- plied to the same superstitious and truly idolatrous purposes as their own. They may invent or exaggerate differences be- tween ^Calvin and Zuingle and their re- spective followers, and hold up to derision the unsuccessful attempts which were made in the heat of theological controversy, and ineffectually repeated at later periods, to establish uniformity of doctrine concern- ing the sacrament among the reformed churches. Protestants do not pretend to exemption from error, but only to sincerity in the search after truth, with a humble confi- dence that while they seek it in a conge- nial spirit, and diligently endeavour to ap- prehend it, by the use of such helps as the divine Mercy has provided for them, and ^ Bossiiet, Hist. Var. Part I. Book ix. Part II. Book xii. LECTURE V. 175 above all, by the careful study of the writ- ten word of God, they will by his grace be preserved from any dangerous misappre- hension of it. If they abandon those prin- ciples, and either in the vanity of human reason prefer novelty to truth, or resign themselves to the blind guidance of rash enthusiasm, or dogmatical bigotry, then in- deed there will be reason to fear that God will abandon them. In the mean time, as the best security against error, let them walk in the light as childy^en of the light. Thus much it seems right to say of the reformation in general, respecting this sub- ject of the doctrine of the eucharist ; and that, not merely as an act of justice to- wards our fellow protestants of other com- munions, but because, as I have before re- marked, it is the standing policy of the enemies of every reformed church, to mis- represent the principles, and exaggerate the real or imputed errors of all, and exhibit them as proofs that the reformation, to which they attribute such consequences, must have originated in the spirit of delu- sion ; from whence they conclude, that the 176 LECTURE V. only safe course for religious protestants to pursue, is to return to the obedience of that infallible church, which, by depriving her dutiful children of the dangerous li- berty of judging and understanding for themselves concerning articles of faith and controverted points of doctrine, preserves them in happy ignorance and uninterrupt- ed unanimity, and so insures their final sal- vation. This, w^hen stripped of all disguise, and exhibited in their true light, is the burden of all their arguments with protestants. Happily we have not so learned Christ, as to be in any danger of being imposed upon by them, nor of being induced by any per- suasions to prefer darkness, with all its al- leged advantages, before that light which is the peculiar attribute of "' the glorious gos- pel of Christ. Of their boasted infallibi- lity, and its necessary consequences, we may leave them the unmolested and unenvied possession. Happily for ourselves, our doctrine of the ^ 2 Cor. iv. 4. LECTURE V, 177 sacrament is so surely established on scrip- ture and reason, that we can reflect upon it with the utmost satisfaction, and have much more reason to invite than to dread discussion, if it should please our adver- saries of any denomination to descend into the field of argument against us. Reli- giously speaking, the church of England stands on a basis which cannot be shaken. Her doctrine is the doctrine of scripture, which is her only rule of faith and wor- ship ; is clear, consistent, spiritual, and full of consolation to such as worship God in spirit and in truth. That of the church of Rome, on the con- trary, involves the most glaring contradic- tions, which can be defended only by the most laboured and tortuous sophistry, and is the source of multiplied superstitions ; and while it is founded upon an asserted fact, which is acknowledged to be totally imperceptible to sense and incomprehensi- ble to reason, she requires all her members to receive it on pain of eternal damnation, as if it were as intuitively certain, or as capable of demonstration, as the being of N 178 LECTURE V. God, or any. express article of the Christian faith. Those, therefore, with whom the author- ity of an infaUible church is paramount to all objections, who can believe with her, and in deference to her demands, in oppo- sition to sense and reason, that in the con- secrated wafer, and every the smallest par- ticle of it, the body, blood, soul, and divi- nity of the eternal only-begotten Son of God are fully contained, and ought to be worshipped with the highest degree of di- vine adoration, those who believe these things do rightly in adhering to her com- munion, and may be respected for their well-meaning piety, as well as commiserat- ed for their doating superstition. But if there be any who do not in heart and soul assent to this doctrine, nor be- lieve that it is either taught in scripture or essentially true, nor that divine honour may be lawfully paid by a Christian to the consecrated elements in the eucharist and the pretended sacrifice of the mass, and yet continue professed members of a church which exacts such pledges of allegiance LECTURE V. 179 from all her people, and either by instruc- tion or example lead others to believe what themselves do not believe, what can we say, but that it is high time to lay aside all dis- simulation, and judge themselves, that they be not judged of the Lord ° ! Whatever their motives may be for deal- ing with insincerity in the sight of Him who seeth the secrets of the hearty whether a regard to worldly honour or distinction, the false pride of adhering to tenets once embraced, and defending ancient errors ra- ther than acknowledge and renounce them, or an undue deference to the wishes and opinions of others, their conduct, as men pretending to religion, is equally without excuse. However they may disguise it to themselves, the world has the first place in their affections, and they can never be ac- counted true disciples of that divine Mas- n Bossuet artfully remarks, Variations of Protestants, Vol. I. Book vi. p. 259. " There is no way of avoiding " the sacrifice, adoration, and transubstantiation, without " denying in the bread this real presence of Jesus Christ." We may as truly add, There is no way of justifying them, without proving it. N 2 180 LECTURE V. ter, who ° came into the world, that he might bear ivitness to the truth; nor can any be farther from being governed by that Spirit which was in him, than those who per- versely oppose or unfaithfully handle it. These observations are not advanced in a spirit of uncharitableness ; we are not ani- mated by ill will to the persons of those whose errors we condemn and deplore ; nor do we take merit to ourselves, because by the singular and inscrutable mercy of God we have been delivered from that bondage of spiritual darkness to which so many others are still left enthralled. Well, therefore, does it become us to fol- low the advice of the apostle to the ^ Ro- mans, in circumstances somewhat analogous to our own, not to be high-minded, but fear, and use with moderation •* the liberty where- tvith Christ has made us free. To cherish such a temper is at all times our wisdom and our duty, and will best preserve us from many occasions of falling. But hu- mility, charity, and godly fear are perfectly o John xviii. 37. P Rom. xi. 20. ^ Gal. v. 1. LECTURE V. 181 compatible with a well-governed zeal for the truth. Otherwise they would be in di- rect opposition to the highest and most indispensable obligations of every sincere Christian, but more especially of a Chris- tian minister. For if, as our Lord teaches, it "" is eternal life to know the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom he hath sent, it must be an im- perative duty with them, above all men, never to compromise with error, nor to for- bear to refute, when occasion is afforded them, whatever may tend to impair that knowledge, or render it of none effect. And if offence be taken where none is intended, we must plead for ourselves to those who suffer our expostulation so impatiently, in the words of St. Paul to the Galatians, ' Am I therefore become your enemy, because I tell you the truth? the attainment of which, as it ought to be the object of all our in- quiries, so if it was pursued by all Chris- tians in singleness of heart, then indeed we might hope to see an end to religious ani- r John xvii. 3. ^ Gal. iv. 16. n3 182 LECTURE V. mosities, if not a total cessation of those extreme controversies, by which the house- hold of faith is divided against itself. By some persons the popish doctrine of transubstantiation has been considered as a mere speculative error, and by others as differing more in form than reality from the doctrine of our own church. But, I trust, it is sufficiently evident, that it must be a very inaccurate and superficial view of the subject which could lead any sincere man to either of these conclusions. Whoever will be persuaded to bestow upon the study of it that careful attention which its importance demands, will be con- vinced that both are equally unfounded. He will unavoidably perceive, that the Romish doctrine is not simply liable to the imputation of speculative error, but that it tends of necessity to great practical abuses and corruptions of religion ; while the doc- trine of our church, on the contrary, is li- able to no such objections ; but is altogether holy and spiritual, equally congenial to true piety, and remote from superstition. In a word, the difference between us LECTURE V. 183 on this head, is in effect the same which pervades the respective systems of both churches in all their parts. The one holds to ^ the letter which killeth, the other to the spirit which giveth life. The one exhibits a shew of piety in rites and ceremonies, and external exercises of devotion ; the other, renouncing as utterly worthless and delu- sive all formal acts of religion without faith and holiness, exhorts all her members to "^sanctify the Lord God in their hearts; and while they rely only on the merits and intercession of their Redeemer for deliver- ance from sin and acceptance at the throne of grace, to "" present their bodies a living sacrifice, holy acceptable to God, which is their reasonable service, t 2 Cor. iii. 6. "1 Peter iii. 15. ^ Rom. xii. 1. N 4 LECTURE VI, 1 Timothy ii. 5. For there is one God, and one mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus. AY HEN once the genuine principles of religion have been vitiated or forsaken, and human presumption has ceased to respect the landmarks and fences vs^hich the divine Wisdom has appointed, to repress vain ima- ginations, and direct the researches of sober piety striving to attain the knov^ledge of the truth, the further it proceeds the more w^idely it digresses from the right v^ay ; rea- son is bew^ildered, and one error foUow^s as a corollary to another. It ought not, therefore, to surprise us, vrhen we see those w^ho, vs^ithout the sanc- tion of reason or scripture, in the true spi- rit of heretical perverseness, have proclaim- ed and strenuously contended for the doc- trine of transubstantiation, w^ith its conse- quent and inseparable corruptions of faith 186 LECTURE VL and worship, as true and essential articles of the Christian religion, carried away to still greater lengths of grossness and infa- tuation. The intention which I professed in the opening of these Lectures, was not to exhi- bit a detailed account of all the grave errors of the church of Rome, a work not to be attempted within so narrow a compass, but to notice more particularly some of those which by their greater enormity rendered reformation on religious grounds absolutely necessary ; and because reformation was pe- remptorily denied by the rulers of that church, made it the duty of all sincere Christians who were sensible of her cor- ruptions to withdraw from her communion, and of which, as the efficient and justifying causes of that consummation, the force and reason remain undiminished to the present time. Some, therefore, of very serious import, and which added not a little to the neces- sity of the reformation, but which calmly reviewed, should rather be considered as accessory, than as substantive causes of that LECTURE VI. 187 event, (and which, if the council of Trent had not thought proper to confirm and per- petuate them by her decrees, might have been so modified as to render them in- noxious, or explained away, or tacitly aban- doned,) I must leave to be briefly touched upon hereafter, and for the present pass on to the examination of those more glaring corruptions, by which the worship of the church of Rome has been so nearly assimi- lated to paganism, and which, if the decla- ration of the apostle in the text be true, or the warning which he elsewhere gives, that "" there is no agreement between the temple of God and idols, or that of the prophet, ^ that the Lord will not give his glory to another^ nor his praise to graven images, must be ut- terly rejected without compromise by every sincere and faithful Christian. Not that those other causes of disagree- ment and separation, to which I have at this time made but a cursory allusion, and must eventually dismiss with inadequate brevity, are either obsolete or of light im- a 9. Cor. vi. 16. b Isaiah xlii. 8. 188 LECTURE VI. portance, seeing that they are still integral parts of the Romish system, and pregnant with hurtful superstition ; and are only less worthy of distinct animadversion than the invocation of saints and veneration of images, because they are less forced upon our notice, than these characteristic deform- ities of the church of Rome, which hold so conspicuous a place in her authorized forms of worship, and are at once so degrading to Christianity, and so peculiarly offensive to those who draw their principles of religion from holy scripture, and not from apocry- phal tradition. The first of these, the invocation of saints, shall form the main argument of my pre- sent Discourse. If all other evidences were wanting to prove that the church of Rome is given up to a "" strong delusion, and is no longer a true church of Christ, notwithstanding her lofty pretensions and imposing display of exterior sanctity, practices like these, ob- stinately retained and artfully defended, in c 2 Thess. ii. 11. LECTURE VI. 189 direct and manifest contradiction to all that we know of the attributes of God by reason or revelation, would fully justify us in pro- nouncing such a judgment concerning her. Having scarcely a shadow of scriptural au- thority for either of these gross deprava- tions of Christian worship, it is boldly as- serted by that church, that they are both founded upon apostolical tradition ; which, as I have before observed concerning the uses in general to which it is applied, would be alone sufficient to destroy the credit of tradition, and to justify our church in re- jecting it altogether as a rule of faith and worship, and admitting its authority in any sense, or for any purpose, under this re- striction only, " that nothing be ordained " against God's word." Nor could a more decisive proof be adduced of the pernicious consequences of placing tradition on a level with scripture, than that which the case before us exhibits, of attempting to esta- blish by tradition principles of faith and worship, which we may without hesitation pronounce to be utterly incompatible with the elementary truths of revealed religion, 190 LECTURE VI. and so unworthy of the infinite, incompre- hensible Deity, that even the reason of an enlightened heathen would revolt at them. And if it were possible, as Romanists pretend, to trace up to the earliest ages of the church, either doctrines or institutions at variance with that immutable rule, which the wisdom of God has provided in his writ- ten word for the perpetual security and cri- terion of our faith, it would not at all be- nefit the cause of those who contend for them. It might prove the early origin of corruption, but could not justify it. If but the last link in the chain were wanting, if that, for which apostolical authority is claimed, cannot be traced up to the apo- stles themselves, of which their inspired writings, if at least it be a point of doc- trine, are now the only admissible testi- mony, the whole must fall to the ground, and is no more worthy of regard, than if it were the invention of yesterday ; and when Romanists boast of the superior antiquity of their form of faith and worship, it is proper to remember, that nothing is really ancient in religion, which is posterior to LECTURE VL 191 the age in which Christianity in its unadul- terated truth and purity was first preached upon earth by our Lord and his apostles ; and that whatever of later origin has been added to it, at however remote a period from our own times, is truly and properly a religious novelty. Whatever authority may be claimed for the fathers by their fondest admirers, they will not certainly at- tribute inspiration to them ; and if either their glosses on scripture, or their histori- cal testimony, or recorded opinions, or un- guarded phraseology can be adduced in support of manifest depravations of authen- tic Christianity, it may indeed weaken their own credit for judgment or fidelity, but can never shake that of the apostles and evangelists, to whom the final appeal must be made for terminating all controversies of faith and doctrine among Christians. Now it is declared by the modern church of Rome to be an article of the true catho- lic faith, out of which no man can be saved, " ^ that the saints reigning together with d Creed of Pope Pius, Art. 8. 192 LECTURE VL " Christ are to be venerated and invoked, " and that they offer prayers to God for us, " and that their rehcs are to be venerated;" and no one can be received as a convert into her communion, or honestly and with a good conscience continue a member of it, vrho does not, without subterfuge or mental reservation, assent to every proposition ex- pressed or implied in this article. Arguing with men who were permitted to see the truth, and who were not bound to the defence of corruptions once sanc- tioned in their church, by the necessity of preserving unbroken the spell of her pre- tended infallibility, it would be sufficient for the refutation of so gross a mixture of pre- sumptuous error and debasing superstition, as are here engrafted on the faith necessary to salvation, to exhort them to search the scriptures whether these things are so, or to consult the reason which God has given them for their guidance, wheresoever he has not interposed by a special revelation of his will. But, as it has been before observed, rea- son in its most pious exercise is scarcely al- LECTURE VL 193 lowed a place by Romanists in controver- sies of religion. It is the prerogative of the church, or of those who speak in her name, to judge and determine in all such cases, and the duty of her members, unless they are prepared to incur the stigma and penalties of heresy, to bow to her authority, and abide by her decision; and in the present instance, scrip- ture, in every part it, from Genesis to Reve- lations, is both in letter and spirit so de- cidedly against them, that ultimately they have no resource left, but to take refuge in church authority and tradition ; which, as I have observed in a former Lecture, is their grand expedient to escape from every diffi- culty and to cloke every corruption. A very faint attempt indeed is made to de- rive an apparent sanction from scripture for the invocation of saints, or rather, by the artful misapplication of irrelevant pas- sages, to render the practice less offensive to such of their own communion as might possibly think that in a case of so great mo- ment the Bible-book, as they contemptu- ously term it, ought not to be altogether 194 LECTURE VI. superseded by the authority of tradition, or the mandates of popes and decrees of coun- cils. But the attempt is so faint, the argu- ments so feeble and unnatural, that seri- ously to refute them would be to give them an importance which they do not deserve: a very slight notice of some of them in their proper place will be sufficient for every use- ful purpose. As to protestants, therefore, who admit no rule of faith, nor testimony in support of any doctrine as conclusive, but that of holy writ alone ; nor allow to any uninspired mortal the right of chang- ing, suppressing, or adding to the faith once delivered to the saints, it is superflu- ous to argue against that which is unsup- ported and unsanctioned by the only au- thority to which they believe it consistent with the first principles of their religion to defer. The want of such sanction and sup- port is with them the most decisive refuta- tion of any thing which is pronounced by mere human authority to be entitled to universal belief or observance; and upon this ground alone, if other reasons were wanting, we should be justified in rejecting LECTURE VI. 195 the fellowship of a church, which attempts to impose upon all Christians as an article of faith necessary to salvation, that which, by her own shewing, is incapable of being proved true from scripture ; and much more, when it is such in its nature, that we can prove it false beyond the power of contra- diction, if the dispute is to be terminated by the letter or spirit of scripture. But the necessity of withdrawing from a church which has introduced and pertina- ciously retains such a depravation of true religion as that of addressing invocations and prayers to created beings, and still re- quires all her members to adopt the prac- tice in obedience to her decrees, as the church of Rome has done, is rendered yet more apparent in her case by the argu- ments employed to vindicate and recom- mend it. — The church of Rome holds as expressly, and, we doubt not, as sincerely as ourselves, the first great principle of all true religion, the unity of God, and the fundamental articles of the Christian faith ; and we are not called upon to argue these points against her, for the refutation of her o 2 196 LECTURE VI. doctrines upon the subject in question, or the justification of our own church in her total condemnation of them ; but to shew the inconsistency of holding these immuta- ble truths, and yet, as we may boldly affirm, in plain disregard of their necessary con- sequences, and in direct opposition to scrip- ture and reason, on the strength of a pre- tended apostolical tradition, unattested, as we have already seen by any credible evi- dence, and intrinsically unworthy of the origin to which they ascribe it, imparting to inferior natures a portion of that ho- nour which is due to God alone ; of which presumptuous impiety we hold that church to be undoubtedly guilty. St. Paul imputes it to the ancient hea- then, that ^ when they knew God, they glori- fied him not as God, that they became vain in their imaginations, that pi^ofessing them- selves ivise, they became fools; and to the delusive vanity of being wise above those simple and self-evident truths which are attainable by reason, concerning the being and attributes of God, from the survey of e Rom. i. 21, 22. LECTURE VI. 197 his visible works, they fell into idolatry and its inseparable consequences of mental blindness and moral corruption ; so that while we find in heathen writers the most just and beautiful sentiments concerning the Deity, to whom they ascribe holiness, justice, benevolence, and other truly divine perfections, their systems of religion were utterly unworthy of God, and incompatible with their creed. They worshipped him not as a Being invested with such attri- butes ; as the apostle speaks, they glorified him not as God. They neither remembered in their practice the holiness and spiritu- ality of his nature, 'nor honoured him with services which such a Being might vouch- safe to accept from his rational creatures, but invented ceremonies and forms of ado- ration full of licentiousness and impurity ; and bestowing divine honours upon a vast multitude of inferior beings, whom they as- sociated with the supreme God in the go- vernment of the world, they at length to- tally lost sight of those cardinal truths of natural religion, which, if duly observed, would have saved them from sinking into * o 3 198 LECTURE VI. such depths of grossness and debasement. Forsaking the real though imperfect light of nature, and giving themselves up to a vain imagination, they were carried away with infinite delusions, and ^ their foolish heart was darkened. I would not be thought to insinuate in the remotest sense, that the church of Rome at this day stands in the same predicament as the heathen world before the coming of Christ. Nor is it possible that any sect of Christians, while they continue to hold the fundamental articles of the faith once re- vealed to the universal church, which that of Rome assuredly does, though obscured and grievously debased by spurious addi- tions, should relapse into all the darkness and corruption of paganism. Between un- enlightened heathens, and Christians in the most unfavourable state compatible with their religion, there will still be a wide dif- ference : but it is certain that those of Rome, while they claim to be alone entitled to the true name of Christians, ^ have^ like f Rom. i. 21. s Eccl. vii. 29. LECTURE VI. 199 the heathen, sought out many inventions, whereby the salutary truths which they maintain are to a great degree rendered ineffectual ; and among the foremost of these must be placed the veneration and invocation of saints and angels, which can- not be practised without infringing upon the attributes of God. The Psalmist beautifully suggests the grounds of divine adoration, in one of his most admirable addresses to the Deity ; ^ Thou that hear est prayer, unto thee shall all flesh come. On this principle alone it is that we pray to God with full confidence, because we certainly believe him to be all-wise, all- powerful, and all-good ; and by virtue of these incommunicable attributes that he knows our wants, and is ever ready to grant what we ask aright, with a perfect resigna- tion of our will to his, " ' for the relief of " our necessities, and the setting forth of " his glory." The very act of praying im- plies this belief concerning the Deity whom h Psalm Ixv. 2. * Collect after communion. o 4 200 LECTURE VI. we worship ; and without such a persua- sion, to pray at all, to supplicate the com- passion, or invoke the help of a being, whom we did not believe conscious of our ad- dresses, or able to grant our petitions, would be an act of the most senseless absurdity. The Roman Catholics, therefore, who have made it an integral part of their reli- gion to address themselves in prayer to de- parted saints, that is, to the spirits of men and women, whose hearts, while they lived, were known to God alone, and who are yet waiting in another state the final award of the great day, must be guilty of the fearful presumption of ascribing to them some por- tion at least of the glorious perfections of the Deity. That they are sensible of the difficulty of defending such a practice, and satisfying the scruples of the more enlightened among themselves, is sufficiently evident from the fanciful and indefinite explanations by which they endeavour to escape from it. One of their most distinguished apolo- gists leaves it undetermined, after asserting unequivocally, in his celebrated Exposition LECTURE VI. 201 of the Doctrines of the Church of Rome, " that prayers addressed to the saints are " exceedingly profitable to such as make " use of them," through what channel this great benefit is to be obtained. Reason, however, would seem to require, that, if the custom of addressing prayers to the saints be indeed so exceedingly profit- able, the manner and principle of it should not be left in vague uncertainty by the most learned expositors of the Romish te- nets, while at the same time they feel them- selves qualified to speak so expressly of the great advantages attending it ; and yet in that most celebrated treatise to which I have just referred, and to the orthodoxy of which every member of that church zeal- ously assents, we find nothing positively as- serted ; but instead of a precise explanation, where, if the doctrine be but true, it does not appear to exceed the measure of human comprehension, or to involve any inscrutable mystery, we are amused only with visionary speculations, " ^ whether, for instance, the k Bossuet, Expos, of Cath. Doct. p. 27. ' Ibid. 20^ LECTURE VI. " saints comprehend us by the intercourse " or ministry of angels, who, being esta- " Wished ministering spirits by the order of " God in the work of our salvation, know, " as the scripture testifies, what passes here " amongst us ; or whether God himself dis- " covers our desires to them by a particular " revelation ; or whether, in short, he dis- " closes the secret to them in his infinite " essence, where all truth whatever is com- " prehended." Here, if there is nothing satisfactory to the rigid inquirer after truth, there is at least sufficient latitude of explanation in an article of faith declared necessary to sal- vation, to render it palatable through some mental fiction to those who might not otherwise be easily reconciled to the ad- mission of it. But whether any of his in- genious hypotheses afforded satisfaction to their eminently acute author, while he la- boured to remove the scruples of others less clearsighted than himself, we may be permitted to doubt. Another very recent defender of the church of Rome, inferior in ability to few, LECTURE VI. 203 and in zeal to none, who have advocated the same cause before him, has laboured this point with infinite art, but without shedding any new light upon it "". His object, indeed, has been too evidently to elude unanswerable objections to the whole system of saint-worship, and to ob- scure what he professes to illustrate ; and all that he attempts to say, bearing upon the real question, amounts but to this ; that although they grant that Christ alone is the Mediator of salvation, it is not to be argued from thence that there is no other me- diator of intercession ; (upon which I would remark by the way, that it clearly amounts to an unwilling acknowledgment that the pretended mediation of the saints is incom- patible with the sole mediation of Christ asserted in the text ;) and because St. Paul requested the prayers of the churches in his labours and trials, and Job those of his living friends in his affliction, he adduces this as a justification of the Romish prac- tice of praying to departed saints to inter- "■■ Milner, Part III. p. 18. End of Religious Contro- versy, Letter 33. 204 LECTURE VI. cede with God for them by prayers on their behalf. It is not worth while to analyze the un- intelligible phrase of a Mediator of inter- cession distinct from the Mediator of saU vation, an office wholly unknown to holy scripture, and therefore affording an addi- tional illustration of the value of tradition, by the aid of which so important a disco- very has been made ; nor to point out the difference between asking the prayers of our brethren here on earth"', for whom it is a part of our commanded duty to perform the same office of spiritual charity, and in- voking the spirits of the dead, to render us that help which the scripture teaches us to expect from the Son of God alone, who is. also the Son of man, and the only appointed Mediator between God and man ; " " ivho having entered by his own blood into the holy places not made with hands, ever liveth to make intercessio7i for those who put their whole trust in him. To him we apply in every time of need, in full confidence of his m 1 Tim. ii. 1. n Heb. ix. 24, &c. LECTURE VI. 205 favourable kindness towards us, because he died once to deliver us from our sins ; and of his power to save us, because he is one with the Father and the Holy Ghost, hav- ing "* all power both in heaven and in earthy being p over all, God blessed for ever. This is a substantial faith, which may strengthen the weak, encourage the humble, and raise up the fallen ; and when the word of God assures us, that we have him for our Advocate with the Father who is him- self the propitiation for our sins, how great must be the blindness, how excessive the infatuation of those, who, doubting the suf- ficiency of such a mediation, have recourse to other mediators of whose power to help them they know nothing; and of whose con- sciousness to the prayers addressed to them not even the wisest among the vindicators of such a practice can give a rational and con- sistent explanation. Such, however, are the consequences of indulging a vain imagination, and suffer- ing human authority to dictate concerning o Matth. xxviii. 18. P Rom. ix. 5. 206 LECTURE VI. things which can be known only by the re- velation of God. But if argument fail, our last quoted author has recourse to persua- sion, to induce us to adopt the practice of praying to saints and angels : " How sub- " lime and consoling," he exclaims, " how " animating is the practice of true catho- " lies, compared with the opinions of pro- " testants ! We hold daily and hourly con- " verse, to our unspeakable comfort and ad- " vantage, with the angelic choirs, with the " venerable patriarchs and prophets of an- " cient times, with the heroes of Chris- " tianity, the blessed apostles and martyrs, " and with the bright ornaments of it in " later ages, the Bernards, the Xaverii, the " Teresas, and the Sales's. They are all " members of the catholic church." And, proceeding in his address to his imaginary correspondent, he adds, " Why should not " you partake of this advantage? Your soul, " you complain, (dear sir,) is in trouble ; you " lament that your prayers to God are not " heard : continue to pray to him with all " the fervour of your soul; but why not en- " gage his friends and courtiers to add the LECTURE VI. 207 " weight of their prayers to your own "^ ?" With more to the same effect. After perus- ing this passage, one can hardly forbear ex- claiming, What a heaven must the author of this rhapsody have contemplated ! And yet, as I have before observed, these are not the words of an unknown fanatic in a distant age, but of 'one recently remov- ed from these sublunary abodes, and long reckoned among the brightest luminaries and firmest pillars of modern popery in this country ; and, if true wisdom and excessive superstition could coalesce in one person, his talents and acquirements would give de- served weight to his opinion. And yet how strange to the ears of Christians, who know the scriptures, must such delirious extrava- gances sound ! and to what depths of anile imbecility must not those be sunk, how wise soever in their own conceits, who could imagine or admit such fictions for truth ? The holy scriptures indeed encou- rage us to look beyond this earthly scene, q Milner, Part III. p. 18. End of Religious Contro- versy, Letter 33. ' Vicar apostolic and bishop of Castabala. 208 LECTURE VI. and to elevate our thoughts to those plea- sures which are at God's 7*ight hand for evermore^ and in our passage through this vale of mortality to endeavour to fit our- selves for the society of angels and the spi- rits of just me7i made perfect. To attain to this is the final aim and hope of all true Christians ; but in vain shall we look through the sacred volume for saints reign- ing with Christ, while the church is still militant upon earth, and exercising power and influence as the friends and courtiers of the Almighty ! Such a figment of vision- ary superstition is monstrous to reason, and shocking to Christian piety ; nor will a pa- rallel to it be any where found, except in the mythology of the heathen, from whence it was undoubtedly borrowed. To be given up to such delusions is the fearful penalty of following human tradi- tions falsely asserted to be divine, and re- fusing to submit to the sole authority of the written word of God; which, to those who piously study and dutifully obey it, is a sure and sufficient guide to all that we are required to know concerning the will LECTURE VI. 9X9 and dispensations of God, and all, probably, that in our present state we are capable of comprehending concerning those secret things of eternity, which the divine Wis- dom has not more fully revealed. And if the most profound and learned among the advocates of such a system of religion, if the most admired luminaries of the papal church, have wandered into such mazes of dangerous error, it is nothing wonderful that their less enlightened followers should be immersed in yet grosser superstitions ; a fact too notorious to be here insisted on, though not without its weight in estimat- ing the merits of the system itself, to which such consequences invariably adhere. But it is not true, as they pretend, that they pray to saints only as mediators, though even that is a perilous and sinful presump- tion. They make also direct addresses to them, as endued with power to grant their requests ; and, though they generally in ar- gument refuse to acknowledge this, their authorized books of devotion incontestably prove it, and that consequences as injurious to morality as religion have flowed from it. 210 LECTURE VI. But far beyond the pernicious delusion of teaching men to rely upon the efficacy of the prayers of the saints for securing the favour of God, is the impious fiction con- cerning the merits of their works and suf- ferings, as contributing, jointly with those of the divine Redeemer, to the remission of the sins of men ; which is in direct opposi- tion to the doctrine of scripture. For the scripture, far from teaching that any man's righteousness is more than suffi- cient for his own justification, inculcates no truth more emphatically than this, that the best of men are still imperfect, and con- eluded under si7i, that in the sight of God no man living shall be justified, and that we are delivered from eternal death only through the sacrifice of the death of Christ, and through faith in his blood. This is the uniform tenor of the New Testament, not the doctrine of any particu- lar section of it, but the great truth which pervades the whole in characters not to be mistaken; so that we are justified in assert- ing that he cannot be a true Christian who does not with his whole heart embrace it ; LECTURE VL 9AI and yet the church of Rome fears not to delude her followers with doctrines utterly at variance with it, concerning the superero- gatory virtues of the saints and the treasures of their merits, which she has in her keeping, to dispense, according to her good pleasure, to such of her children as she deems worthy of so precious a favour; and not only to the sufferings of real martyrs, but even to the self-inflicted tortures of monastic recluses and phrensied fanatics is this efficacy ascrib- ed; and while holy scripture teaches that the best of men are saved only through the me- rits and intercession of Christ, that church has appointed by her own authority, upon the foundation of a vain tradition, o-ther mediators between God and man, to whom she directs her members to make their humble addresses, and to depend upon their good offices. This is more particularly true concerning the prayers addressed to the blessed Virgin, in whose honour the powers of language have been exhausted, to furnish appellations and epithets, some of which are offensive to protestant ears from their extravagant ab- p 2 212 LECTURE VI. surdity, and some it would be a breach of Christian piety to utter. But not only to her who enjoyed the supreme honour of being mother to the Son of God, and whom, according to her own prophecy, ' all gene- rations shall call Blessed; nor to the inspir- ed apostles, by whom the gospel was first preached to all nations, and by whose writ- ings the universal church is still edified and enlightened, are these honours paid, and these powers ascribed ; but to a multi- tude of others, whose names are almost un- known to the world, whose very existence is in some instances doubtful, and whose piety, recorded in fabulous legends, was, if sincere, of that fanatical kind, which, if they had been protestants, would have been attribut- ed by those who now venerate them above the lot of mortality, to disordered intellects or spiritual delusion. Yet to such persons, pronounced by the Roman pontiffs to be saints, honours all but divine are paid, litanies addressed, pil- grimages performed, and miracles ascribed in such abundance, that in the dark ages s Luke i. 48. LECTURE VI. 213 in which they flourished the course of na- ture would seem to have been suspended, for the exhibition of their prodigious en- dowments ; and that, for the most part, to establish no important truth of religion, but simply to signalize the sanctity of the individual, or the excellence of some religi- ous order, or to confirm some artful pre- tension of the church of Rome. And although the claims to *saintship are said to be now liable to a severer scrutiny, and works which in ignorant ages would have excited astonishment would now only provoke derision ; yet the power of canoniz- ing saints to whom prayers are to be offer- ed, and by whose prayers in return the liv- ing are to be benefited, is still claimed and exercised by the popes, and the power of working miracles, which is one of the re- quisite marks of real saintship, is unhesi- tatingly asserted to be a perpetual and pe- culiar privilege of the church of Rome by all her advocates ; and the " experiments of t Vide Introductory Discourse to Butler's Lives of Saints. " Prince Hohenlohe, &c. 214 LECTURE VI. that kind which in our times have been attempted upon superstitious creduUty, and are yet fresh in the memory of us all, suffi- ciently prove that deceivers will never be wanting, while there are those who are will- ing to be deceived. Concerning the general character of those mortals, who by the papal fiat are elevated before the last judgment into courtiers of heaven, and, as they express it, mediators of intercession between God and man, a just estimate may be formed by referring to an authority, which on such a point is above all exception. The latest specimen of the Lives of the Saints, not long since edited by a living layman of that church, a zealous and distinguished partisan of all her spiritual claims and pretensions, and a partial admirer of the original author of that notable compilation, though it is ac- knowledged that much has been retrenched, as less fit for the public eye in these days, exhibits, blended at the same time with much appearance of misapplied piety, such a picture of miserable credulity both in the editor^ who has in these days reproduced LECTURE VI. 215 such a work, and the community to which such monuments of superstition can still be acceptable, as cannot but excite the astonish- ment of Christians, who have been accus- tomed to the reading of holy scripture, and the study of its history and doctrines, for the edification of their faith. It is unnecessary to adduce particular instances in support of this position. Our objections to the worship of created beings stand on much broader ground than the unworthiness of particular individuals, to whom the honours of saintship may have been awarded ; and if it could be shewn that, instead of the superstitious aberrations which their historians attribute to them, these semidei of popery were endowed with the most exalted spiritual graces and vir- tues of which human nature in its most im- proved state is capable, they would be no- thing more entitled to the homage of vene- ration and invocation, how much soever we might reverence their memory and desire to imitate their example. But far beyond the absurdity of praying to saints is that of venerating their relicks, p 4 ,^16 LECTURE VI. which is equally required of Romanists in the same article of the papal creed. And to these also, as well as to the originals them- selves, miraculous virtues are ascribed, and prodigies without number are affirmed to have been effected by them ; imminent pe- rils averted, inveterate diseases healed, pes- tilences stayed, "" armies of aliens turned to flight, by the presence of the mortal re- mains or cast-off garments of the saints. And so unlimited is the extent of this cre- dulity that, unless we had their own testi- mony against themselves, it would be deem- ed a gross injustice towards the existing members of the Romish church in this country, to believe them capable of it. The histories of all nations in their earlier pe- riods are full of marvellous events and su- pernatural prodigies, which invariably cease when civilization and knowledge have dis- pelled the clouds of ignorance, and awaken- ed the reasoning faculties of the mind ; and tales of wonder which shock probability, ^ As the Persians by the hair-shirt of St. Theodosius^ &c. &c. &c. vol. I. of Butler's Lives of Saints, published by Murphy, London, 1821. LECTURE VI. 217 and are inconsistent with all experience, and irreconcileable with the order esta- blished by the providence of God among the works of his creation, are deservedly set down to the account of folly and imposture, and are no longer believed, because no one has an interest in procuring them belief. And such must have been the fate of the ridiculous miracles of the dark ages, if they had not been necessary to support the au- thority of that infallible church, which has undertaken to accredit them, and in so do- ing has staked her own infallibility upon their truth. In estimating the motives and characters of individuals, much must undoubtedly be allowed to the force of early impressions, and the influence of education, upon the most candid minds ; and it would be un- just to tax with conscious insincerity per- sons labouring under such disadvantages, when we find them still professing their belief of such absurdities, and endeavouring to draw others into it. In itself, however, it is matter of just astonishment, when we see men of great natural acuteness, and no 218 LECTURE VL mean attainments in literature, labouring, as the most distinguished of modern Ro- man Catholic divines in the united king- dom have done, to perpetuate this^ mental blindness, and to persuade the world that this wonder-working power continually ex- ercised is a standing testimony of the Al- mighty in favour of their church. It exhi- bits, indeed, a very awful warning to all, who are not themselves within the vortex of error, to hold fast to the truth ; while at the same time it is more equitable to attri- bute things, which cannot be justified on rational principles, to the system of religion maintained by that church, which denies to any of her members the unfettered use of their own reason, than to the individuals who have been trained up in it, and have devoted themselves to its support ^ Bound by her authority to exercise their talents in defence of things not only above reason, which many things may be which are yet essentially true, but contrary to reason, which nothing can be, which is not essen- y Miliier, Murray, and Doyle; the two last of whom wrote to establish the belief of Hohenlohe's miracles. LECTURE VI. 219 tially false ; it is too likely that the clear- ness and unity of perception which are con- genial to the study and love of truth will in their minds be impaired by the necessity of finding arguments to palliate and jus- tify those defects in their system which can only be maintained by the utmost efforts of sophistry against reason and probability. We find not in the creed, imposed by the pope after the council of Trent, any express mention of angels ; but the invoca- tion of them forms a part of Romish wor- ship, and is equally inculcated by the same ^ author from whom I have before quoted the exhortation for praying to saints: "You " believe, no doubt," says he, " that you " have a guardian angel appointed by God " to protect you ;" to which, adding an irre- levant quotation from scripture, he pro- ceeds, " address yourself to this blessed spi- " rit with gratitude, veneration, and confi- " dence." Foreseeing, however, the objections which protestants might make to this doctrine of ^ Milner, End of Religious Controversy, Letter 33. Part IIL 220 LECTURE VI. angel-worship, not only as inconsistent with the general tenor of scripture, but expressly forbidden by St. Paul, who attributes it to the vanity of a fleshly mind, intruding into those things which it hath not seen, and not holding the Head, that is, the true doc- trine of Christ the only Mediator ; with an attempt to deceive, which cannot be repro- bated with adequate severity in a matter of such awful importance, he hesitates not to assure his reader, " "" that the worship of " angels, condemned by the apostle, means " only the worship of the fallen or wicked " angels, whom Christ despoiled, and which " was paid to them by Simon the magician " and his followers, as the makers of the " world." Simon Magus and the Mani- cheans seem to haunt the imaginations of Roman Catholic divines ; they see the ves- tiges of them every where, except in their own unerring church ; and whatever they wish to bring into the greatest odium, in utter contempt of reason and probability, is commonly referred to their inventions. But ^ Milner from Hawarden. End of Religious Contro- versy, Letter 35, Part III. LECTURE VI. 221 the present is a difficulty, out of which even Simon Magus cannot help them. The text of St. Paul is too plain to be mistaken by any one who wishes to know his meaning, and in fact bears a strong re- semblance to that passage in his Epistle to the Romans, to which I adverted in a former part of this Lecture, where he attri- butes the corruptions of the heathen to the neglect of that which they might have known concerning the invisible God from the contemplation of his visible works ; the consequence of which was, that professing themselves wise, they became fools ; and in like manner he attributes the voluntary humility of worshipping angels, as we have just now seen, to the vanity of a fleshly mind, intruding into those secret things which God has not revealed to man. It is impossible to torture this into a prohibi- tion against imitating Simon Magus and his followers. When the tempter approach- ed our Lord, he repulsed his suggestions with these pregnant words, ^ Thou shalt ivorship the Lord thy God, and him only b Matth. iv. 10. 222 LECTURE VI. shalt thou serve. And surely it must have been a very unnecessary caution in the apo- stle, to warn those to whom he had himself preached the gospel, that it was inconsist- ent with their religion to worship evil spi- rits, the enemies of God and man, and from whose power the Son of God came down from heaven to deliver them. It was a- gainst the voluntary humility, as the apo- stle speaks, of worshipping good angels, be- ings superior indeed to man, but inferior to God, and possessing and exercising no power or influence but what it may please God to impart to them, that the apostle's caution was designed. Such a practice he considers inconsistent with the command of God and the worship due to Him alone, as well as derogatory to the sole mediation of Christ, "^ ivho is the Head over all things to his church. No truth can possibly be clearer than this, to those who seek the knowledge of their religion in the scrip- ture, and it will be a vain attempt, by the forced interpretation of any insulated text, to cast a plausible doubt upon it. Hardly c Ephes. i. 2S. LECTURE VI. 2£3 will tradition itself avail them here, since even the church of Rome does not contend that tradition is to be obeyed in direct op- position to scripture. Would Roman Catholics, therefore, but consult the scripture with unbiassed minds, and understand it in its own unadulterated sense — not merely in that which a pretended infallible church, systematically sinning a- gainst its plainest truths, and dreading that its own corruptions may be exposed by its light, deems it necessary to fix upon it — happier days would dawn upon the Chris- tian world, and the reign of error hasten to its close : the unsightly pile of heathenish superstition, erected in the darkest ages upon credulity and fear, and guarded by anathemas against the influx of light, which might expose the rottenness of its founda- tions, would fall to pieces, and the true church of Christ be renewed in the beauty of holiness and the majesty of truth. LECTURE VII. Deut. iv. 15. Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves ; for ye saw no maimer of similitude on the day that the Lord spahe unto you in Horeh out of the midst of the fire. From the veneration and invocation of saints, which was particularly discussed in my last Lecture, the transition is easy to the still grosser abomination of honouring and venerating images, which I have re- served for the subject-matter of the pre- sent; both being equally of pagan origin, and, however modified or refined, essentially inconsistent with true religion. St. Paul, arguing the superiority of the gospel to the law, tells the ^ Galatians, that the law had been to the Jews as a school- master to bring them to Christ ; that is, a less perfect dispensation of religion, suited to the times and circumstances in which it a Gal. iii. S4. Q 226 LECTURE VII. was given, and under the discipline of which they were to be prepared for that more per- fect and spiritual, which was in the appoint- ed time to be revealed by Christ. One great purpose of the law, therefore, was to wean them from the corruptions of the heathen nations by whom they were surrounded, and which, as their whole his- tory proves, they were at all periods ante- cedent to the Babylonish captivity so prone to imitate. But among those heathenish corruptions of religion there is none more striking, nor any against which they are more frequently and earnestly cautioned, or deterred from the practice of it by more terrible denunciations of divine anger, than that of idolatry or image-worship. It cannot be necessary to make appeals either to the law or the prophets in support of so notorious and incontrovertible a truth; but it is very important to observe, that it is not merely against making the likeness of any such imaginary being, whether good or evil, as those which were worshipped by the heathen, which is prohibited. Not even the making of any graven image is al- LECTURE VII. 227 lowed, whether as a representation or me- morial of the true God ; of whom, as they are reminded in the text, they saw no simi- litude, when he spake unto them in Horeb, at the giving of the law, with all the fearful circumstances attending it. Now it seems to follow, as a necessary con- clusion from these premises, that if image- worship of any kind was too gross, and un- worthy of the Deity, to be allowed to a people so little refined in understanding as the Israelites were in the days of Moses ; and if it seemed good to the divine Wis- dom to punish the violation of the com- mandment by which it is forbidden with the heaviest judgments, and to suffer no re- laxation of its strictness till the end of that dispensation; that it never can be consist- ent with the spiritual perfection of the Christian dispensation, of which the Mosaic was but the shadow, to tolerate the intro- duction of it as a mode or accompaniment of Christian worship. And whereas our Lord declares that he ^ came not to destroy the law or the pro- b Matth V. 17. a 2 528 LECTURE VII. phets, but to fulfil them, it is surely incredi- ble that his religion should have gone di- rectly against the law and the prophets in a matter of such vital importance, without at least some distinct avowal of the intend- ed change, or some explanation of the rea- son for adopting it, as we find in other in- stances where a new commandment is given to supersede an ancient and received opin- ion or practice. But so far is this from being the case, that in the whole compass of the New Tes- tament not a single sentence is found which can afford the slightest semblance of an apology for image-worship ; nor is the men- tion of it ever introduced, unless in the way of reprobation, and for the purpose of warning the Gentile converts to have no fellowship with it. Yet, notwithstanding the most explicit and positive authority both of the Old and New Testament to the contrary, the second Nicene council dared to assert, that the wor- ship of images was an apostolical tradition ; and the council of Trent, which has adopt- ed in general the errors of all its predeces- LECTURE VII. 229 sors, has reaffirmed this in the most direct and unequivocal terms ; and the pope, who sanctioned its decrees, has reduced it into an article of the faith, out of which, it is for ever reiterated, that no one can be saved; " "^ That the images of Christ and of the " ever Virgin mother of God," (may I be pardoned for giving utterance to such im- piety !) " moreover of the other saints, are to " be had and retained, and that due honour " and veneration are to be shewn to them." Here again, as in the case of the invocation and veneration of saints and angels, the church of Rome, in resting her doctrine concerning the veneration of images on apostolical tradition, has in effect placed tradition in direct contradiction to the ac- knowledged written word of the same apo- stles ; whose authority she thus most men- daciously claims for a practice not only not sanctioned, but either expressly or con- structively condemned by every one of them in their Epistles addressed to the universal Christian community, or to the c Creed of pope Pius, Art. 9- Q 3 230 LECTURE VII. particular churches severally founded by them. But the direct and positive authority of the law and the gospel, though abundantly sufficient to convict the church of Rome of enormous corruption in the instance be- fore us, is by no means the whole strength of the case against her. There is, besides, a negative testimony against the possibility of the apostles ever having taught or countenai>ced image-wor- ship, than which nothing more conclusive can be desired, to disprove so groundless and so shameless a fiction. It will not be denied by any one in the least conversant with the history and opin- ions of the Jews, subsequent to their re- turn from captivity, that image-worship was thenceforward to their final dispersion held in the greatest abhorrence by them ; that they had endured the utmost cruelty from Antiochus Epiphanes, because they would not yield to his attempts to force that and other heathenish rites upon them ; and that at a much later period they were objects of ridicule to Roman wits and satir- LECTURE VII. 231 ists ^ for their scrupulous adherence to their own laws and customs, and in particular for their singular resistance to this almost universal usage of paganism. It is not less undeniable, that the rulers of the Jews in the days of the apostles and their succes- sors, till the destruction of Jerusalem and the dissolution of their national polity, were animated with the most furious zeal against Christianity, and persecuted its professors wherever their*- power or influence extend- ed. According to our Saviour's prediction within a very short time after his ascension his disciples were brought before rulers and kings for his name's sake ; and various crimes were laid to their charge, with the hope of crushing Christianity in its infancy by rendering them suspected to magistrates and odious to the people. In pursuance of this design they are accused of blasphemy, sedition, deceiving the people, and design- ing the subversion of the law of Moses ; by which last charge such a tumult was raised against St. Paul, upon his first appearance ^ Nil praeter nubes, et coeli numen adorant. Juv. Q 4 232 LECTURE VII. in the temple after many years' absence from Jerusalem, that he was saved only by the interposition of military force from the hasty vengeance of the enraged multitude. And whether by private conspiracy, or open violence, or false accusation, no efforts were spared to effect the destruction of the first preachers of the Christian faith. This is a fact which must be conceded both by the friends and enemies of Chris- tianity, and is certainly not denied by the church of Rome. Is it then credible, if the apostles, as that church dares to assert, had taught a doc- trine or introduced a practice upon the al- leged foundation of the new religion which they were sent to announce to the world, so contrary as well to the law as to the pro- phets, to both of which the Jews amidst all their corruptions were so zealously attached, as that of image-worship, that it would not have been brought as a charge against them by any of their implacable adversaries, who were so eager to compass their destruction? or that they would have failed to employ so effectual an argument to prevent the LECTURE VII. 233 further progress of the Christian religion, if it had been possible for them to shew to the Jewish nation its near affinity to pagan- ism in one of its most offensive features? Assuredly not. As, therefore, no such attempt was ever made, where it is evident that no accusation would have been omitted, which had the smallest appearance of probability; and still less one which, if it could have been sub- stantiated, must have proved fatal to the cause of Christianity, we are justified by this consideration in asserting, that it is an instance of audacious impiety to endeavour to fix upon the inspired apostles the ori- ginal guilt of this grievous corruption of our holy religion, which they were sent to teach to all nations, and qualified by the extraordinary gift of the Holy Ghost for the fulfilment of their mission; while at the same time so false an imputation af- fords a conclusive argument against the au- thority of papal councils, to which the ad- herents of Rome demand implicit submis- sion, and affirm that their decisions are in- fallible. 284 LECTURE VII. That the practice of image-worship was introduced into the church at an early pe- riod, though long after the age of the apo- stles, there can be no doubt ; and its perpe- tuation in that of Rome down to this pre- sent time is one of the most irrefragable proofs of the fatal effects of placing tradi- tion, by which it is attempted to justify it, on a level with scripture. For thus to prove that an error, how- ever gross, is both ancient and widely dif- fused, is, on their principles, sufficient to make it pass for truth. It becomes forth- with a part of tradition ; and as no supe- rior authority is acknowledged by the ad- vocates of tradition, to which an appeal may be made against it, no remedy remains ; but corruptions which have crept into reli- gion through fraud, fanaticism, or igno- rance, during the darkness of remote ages, must be retained for ever as integral parts of it. But if image-worship be not an aposto- lical tradition, which no man who is not bound to defend inveterate error can pos- sibly pretend that it is, to what exact pe- LECTURE VII. 2S5 riod its origin may be referred is a matter of no real importance. That it was intro- duced into the church by Gentile converts, or adopted, in a most reprehensible spirit of worldly wisdom, by perfidious guardians of the faith, to draw over with less difficulty those who had been accustomed " to the " pomps and vanities" of paganism, when the powers of the world professed them- selves Christian, seems unquestionable. The account which the younger Pliny gives to Trajan in the beginning of the second century concerning the simple worship of the early Christians, which it had been his official duty to investigate, is no bad au- thority for asserting that it had not then begun. We will admit that if it was, pro- perly speaking, a question relative to an ar- ticle of Christian theology, or the interpre- tation of a disputed doctrine, the testimony of a heathen magistrate could have but little weight in the determination of it. But the point at issue in the present case is a mere matter of fact, of which any im- partial man might be a competent voucher; and where there was no partiality to warp 2S6 LECTURE VII. his judgment, there can be no ground to except against his veracity. ^ " They af- " firmed," says he, i. e. those who were brought before him on the charge of being Christians, " that the sum of their fault or " error was this, that they were accustomed " to assemble before light on a stated day, " and to sing a hymn to Christ as to a God ; " to bind themselves by a solemn oath to " no wickedness ; but not to commit theft, " robbery, or adultery ; not to break their " word, nor to refuse to restore a trust when " called upon ; after which it was their cus- " tom to separate, and to meet together " again to take food, promiscuously how- " ever, and innocently." We have here no mention of images of Christ or the blessed Virgin, or the saints, nor even of transubstantiated wafers and the sacrifice of the mass ; which on the au- thority of tradition an author \ from whom I have largely quoted before, asserts to have been celebrated " through a great part e Epistle 97. f Milner, End of Religious Controversy, Part III. p. 54. Letter 37. LECTURE VII. 237 " of the known world, before even St. Mat- " thew's gospel was promulgated." And yet it seems scarcely possible that a writer ap- parently so accurate as Pliny should have entirely omitted to notice such things, if they had then existed among Christians, who were at the same time objects of so much jealous vigilance and cruel persecu- tion ; more especially as he mentions the images of the gods and of the emperor, to which he subsequently states that he com- pelled those accused of being Christians to offer incense, and to address supplications, as a test to which no true Christian could be induced to submit. Yet the wisest of those who are still held in the fetters of Romish infallibility, with the letter and spirit of all scripture against them, still contend for this undoubted offspring of paganism with as much apparent earnest- ness, as if they had the unequivocal testi- mony of the law and the gospel in their favour ^. A consciousness however that all is not g Vide Bossuet, Milner, and Doyle's Parliamentary Examinations. 238 LECTURE VII. right evidently betrays itself in their mode of arguing in defence of it, and more espe- cially in their endeavours to suppress the second commandment, by which image- wor- ship is so strongly condemned, or to ex- plain it away and invalidate its force ; which they could have no more reason for doing in the case of that particular command, than of any other precept or prohibition of the Decalogue, if they were not intimately sensible that the practice of their church is in direct opposition to it; while, at the same time, the reasons which they assign for it are so evasive and unsatisfactory, that, how much soever charity may require us to abstain from the imputation of unworthy motives, it is difficult to conceive how men, at once enlightened and sincere, could ever have recourse to them for the support of a cause which themselves believed to be founded in essential truth. To the same sense of its inherent ofFen- siveness must we attribute the endeavour to palliate the practice of venerating images and relicks, by bestowing upon them the plausible appellations of religious memo- LECTURE VII. 239 rials and types of Christianity ; as if mate- rial objects, whether the perishable work of men's hands, or the miserable remains of mortality, the latter of which nature it- self prompts us to conceal from the sight of the living, and to restore to the earth from whence they were taken, could with any propriety be considered as evidences of spiritual truths, or appropriate monuments of a religion which is to be diffused through the whole world, and to last till the con- summation of all things. They tell us, however, that it is a relative worship only which they pay to images, and that the council of Trent in forbidding to believe " ^ that there is any divinity or " virtue in them for which they should be " reverenced, or that any thing is to be " asked of them, or any confidence is to be " placed in them, but on the contrary, that " the honour given should be referred to " those whom they represent," has esta- blished characteristic marks to distinguish Romanists from idolaters ; " since, so far ^ Bossuet, Exposition of Catholic Doctrine. S40 LECTURE VII. " from believing as they did, that any di- " vinity resides in images, Romanists attri- *' bute no other virtue to them than that " of reminding them more sensibly of their " great originals." These, however, are but imaginary distinctions between the image- worship of Romanists and pagans, as it would be easy to prove by a multitude of examples. Juvenal, Seneca, and the elder Pliny, nearly agree in the same sentiment, " that their gods," referring to the early ages of the Roman commonwealth, "seemed " to be most propitious when their statues " were moulded in clay, and not cast in " gold ; '" which sufficiently shows that the original and the representation were not confounded in the mind of the worshipper, as the author of this pretended distinction would have it believed, even among nations which were ignorant of the true God ; but that the image-worship of the pagans was, like that of the church of Rome, a relative worship, not addressed to the carved or molten figure, but to the being designated i Plin. lib. XIV. IS. LECTURE VII. £41 by it. And the very ground of the pro- hibition, under the Mosaic dispensation, to make any visible object of such relative honour, was, that which is inseparable from it, in its tendency to inspire gross and un- worthy conceptions of the Deity, as if the Supreme Being, whom our blessed Lord declares to be a Spirit, whom no man hath seen or can see, ^was like to corruptible man^ and to lead the ignorant to believe that such objects had intrinsically something divine and adorable in them. And not- withstanding the asserted caution of the council of Trent to prevent such miscon- ceptions, it is very evident that the church of Rome has not escaped the danger, but has ^ 7'eceived in herself that recompense of her error^ which a presumptuous transgres- sion of the divine commands never fails to draw after it. For it is a matter of the ut- most notoriety, that her members ^ are still carried away to dumb idols^ like the Gen- tiles, from whom they imagine themselves sufficiently distinguished by the groundless plea of relative worship. k Rom. i. 23. ' Rom. i. 27. "^ 1 Cor. xii. 2. R 242 LECTURE VII. The histories of miraculous images, and the wonders wrought by them, are found in Roman Cathohc authors of high reputa- tion ; and the superstitious legends of that sort, which are still prevalent in Roman Catholic countries far exceed in number and extravagance the prodigies recorded in all that remains to us of pagan antiquity. But again, in derogation to the above- mentioned caution of the council of Trent, practically it is not true that images are used in the church of Rome only as reli- gious memorials, to excite the attention of the worshippers, and to awaken the fervour of piety. For if that were the sole purpose intended, it must necessarily follow, that all images, as representations of the same ori- ginals, being equally fitted to answer that purpose, would, unless for the costliness of the materials, be held in equal estimation : but this neither is nor ever has been the real state of the case. In every Roman Catholic country there have been in all ages certain images of su- perior sanctity, to which costly offerings have been made, and pilgrimages perform- LECTURE VII. 243 ed ; in return for which testimonies of de- votion, spiritual and temporal favours, in great abundance and variety, have been promised to those who perform such meri- torious acts of piety ; and if there be any thing in these practices contrary to the in- tention of the church of Rome, which can hardly be allowed, considering her jealous vigilance and absolute power to suppress whatever may be contrary to her doctrine and discipline, it is still not the less a fear- ful proof of the extreme danger of depart- ing from the plain sense of the word of God, however plausibly it may be palliated, or however circumspectly it may be at- tempted to limit the departure. It proves indeed, in a striking manner, the truth of the saying of Samuel to Saul, that " re- bellion is as the sin of witchcraft^ and that when men have presumed to set up their own reasonings or inventions against the commands of God, they know not to what lengths they shall be ultimately carried, nor how fatal the consequences will be of overleaping that inviolable barrier. n 1 Sam. XV. S3. R 2 244 LECTURE VII. Certain, however, it is, that the church of Rome, far from disapproving, has highly favoured these superstitions. In this coun- try, indeed, where the spirit of that church is kept in check by fear of the censures of protestants, great pains have been taken by her adherents to exhibit the practice of image-worship, as well as the other most offensive characteristics of popery, under the most innoxious aspect, and to obtrude it as little as possible upon public observa- tion. But this is the effect of policy only, in which that church is seldom deficient; not an abandonment of the idolatrous principle, which, being incorporated into the papal creed, is equally held by all her true and sincere members in every country. Popery, to be known, must be seen in the ascendancy, where, unrestrained by po- licy or fear, she displays her gorgeous vani- ties with conscious pride ; where patron saints are enshrined in almost every church, and the image of the holy Virgin, splen- didly attired, and adorned with the ensigns of royalty, sits enthroned like the deity of LECTURE VII. 245 the temple, and is venerated by kneeling crowds. The time was, when the same religious drama was acted here, and devotees went in pilgrimage to images of the like de- scription, which were supposed to possess peculiar virtues, and to be endowed with transcendent sanctity, from all regions of the land; till the light of divine truth, which shone out with the reformation, de- spoiled them at once of their miraculous powers and their glory, and consigned them, like the idols of the house of Israel, "" to the moles and to the bats. But hardly can any thing in heathen annals vie with the honours paid to the fabled virgin of Loretto, a perfect counter- part to the great goddess Diana of the Ephesians, whose image fell down from Jupiter, except, indeed, that the popish fa- brication far exceeds in audacious impiety and falsehood its pagan original ; and yet such is the debasing influence of supersti- tion among the votaries of Romish infalli- ^ Isaiah ii. 20. R 3 246 LECTURE VII. bility, that the greatest princes in Christen- dom P, not presuming to question the vera- city of the mortal "^ who dared to call him- self the vicar of Christ upon earth, seeing that so monstrous an experiment upon hu- man credulity was first sanctioned, as there is the strongest reason for believing also that it had been secretly contrived by him, have been emulous to evince their piety by the costliness of their offerings to this miraculous image ; whose sanctuary, at no distant period, was full of gold and silver and precious stones, and round whose walls myriads of pilgrims, of every age, sex, and condition, went annually upon their knees '^; nor is there any reason for supposing that the practice is yet discontinued. It would be difficult to conceive that these are relative honours only, which are paid to this far-famed similitude of the blessed Virgin, and that it is not, in the P Among the rest our James the Second.