i^^^f^ ■i^*0^' aifcV.;^s//^>4 H in- / - • PRINCETON, N. J. 'Part of the a> 1 ADDISON ALEXANDER LTBRART. t \ which was presented by Messji*. K. L. and \. Stuakt fl ^'^'^^^' Division.... 1 Sectin- THE b.b\e . NT. En^Us NEW TESTAMENT, ARRANGED IN CHRONOLOGICAL & HISTORICAL ORDER. WITH COPIOUS NOTES PRINCIPAL SUBJECTS IN THEOLOGY THE GOSPELS ON THE BASIS OF THE HARMONIES OF LIGHTFOOT, DODDRIDGE^ PILKINGTON, NEWCOME, AND MICH AE LIS; THE ACCOUNT OF THE RESURRECTION, ON THE AUTHORITIES OF WEST, TOWNSON, AND CRANFIELD : THE EPISTLES ARE INSERTED IN THEIR PLACES, AND DIVIDED ACCORDING TO THE APOSTLES' ARGUMENTS. REV. GEORGE TOWNSEND, M.A. OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE; AND DOMESTIC CHAPLAIN TO THE BISHOP OF DURHAM. IN TWO VOLUMES. VOL. II. Uoitlron : PRINTED FOR C. & J. RIVINGTON, ST. Paul's crurch-yard, and wateri.oo-place, pali.-mall. 18^5. Printed by R. Gilbeil, SL John's-sijuare,' Loudoi THE NEW TESTAMENT. CHAPTER IX. From the Ascension of Christ to the termination of the Period in which the Gospel was preached to the Prose- lytes of righteousness i and to the Jews only \ SECTION I. After the Ascension of Christ the Apostles return to Jeru- salem, ACTS i. ver. 1 — S. and 12—14. Julian Pe- X The former treatise have I made, O Theophilus, of Jerusalem. VufoaS^'a all that Jesus began both to do and teach, 29.'' ' ' Having thus far proceeded through the magnificent temple of the Christian religion, till we have arrived at that holy altar on which the great sacritice was oftered, we are about to con- template the wonderful gift of the Holy Spirit which the now glorified victim sent down from the Holy of Holies. We will pause, however, at the threshold of the rising Church, and appeal to all who have hitherto refused to enter in and worship, if they have been able to discover any God so wor- thy of their homage, as the God of Christianity ; or any temple so firmly established as this beautiful fabric of eternal truth. The Christian challenges the world to produce ano- ther system which is at all comparable to Christianity, in the evidences of its truth, the purity of its precepts, the philosophy of its discoveries, both concerning God and man ; or in all the other essential qualities which the speculations, the fancy,orthc sober reason of the reflecting or the learned in all ages have considered essential to any proposed scheme of religion. The Christian world has hitherto been, for the most part, too patient under the repeated attacks of their antagonists. They have been contented wilh defence, and with maintaining the walls of their fortress ; in replying to, rather than assailing the enemies of their sublime and holy faith. It is true that one considerable advantage has accrued to the cause of truth from this plan of action. Every argument which sophistry has been able to in- vent, and ignorance or vice to advance, has been fully and fairly met, discussed, and refuted. The external and internal evidence of Christianity has been so amply displayed— the Hicts on which the whole system rests have been so ably and repeat- edly enumerated, that no possible danger can be apprehended, if the Church of God continues its vigilance, from any future efforts of the great adversary of mankiud. The danger to which alone it is exposed, is the offence which arises from the VOL. ir. B 2 THE APOSTLES return to JERUSALEM-CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 2 Until the day in which he was taken up, after that he Jerusalem. V^t' ^^^' through the Holy Ghost had given commandments unto 29" ^^^ ^^' the apostles whom he had chosen : negligent lives of its professed followers, or their too indolent security in the goodness of their cause. Let us then leave for a short time the impregnable walls of the Christian truth, and make our incursion into the entrenched camp of the enemy. Let us at once inquire who are these proud boasters who have so long encouraged themselves in their empty blasphemies against the light of Revelation ? What are their claims to our veneration ? Where are their discoveries ? What will they substitute in the place of Christianity ? Where is to be found a complete and perfect system of truth and morals among these pretended illuminators of the human race? I appeal to the records of all ages for an answer, and implore the impartial inquirer to search into the history of all nations, in all peiiods from the day of the Creation, to the present moment, and see whether human reason has been able to frame a consistent religion for itself. If the same one only true reli- gion which is revealed in Scripture, under the three several forms of the Patriarchal, Levitical, and Christian dispensations had been withheld from the world, have we any reason whatever to suppose, that its advantages could have been supplied to the world by any discovery, either of the invention, or speculation of man. One thing only is necessary to be premised— the Christian in this great controversy appeals to facts, experience, and history, while he shrinks from no abstract reasoning, from no metaphy- sical inquiry, from no supposed philosophical deductions, he asserts that his religion is established throughout upon attested and undeniable facts. He demands only of the opponents of Christianity, that the religion they would establish in its place be founded upon facts equally well attested; and upon evi- dences equally satisfactory and undeniable. It is certain that evil is every where around us. It is con- cealed in our heart within — it is visible in our bodies without, in a countless train of infirmities, diseases, and alllictions. It is seen above us in the storms of heaven, around us in the evils of life, and beneath us in the graves of the dead. The ([ueslion whence, and why is evil permitted in this world ? bailies all but the Christian. If God could prevent evil and did not, wh(?re is his benevolence ? if he wished to prevent evil, and could not, where is his power ? Here the intidel is balUed, and liis proud reason staid. Reason Viithout revela- tion has not, and cannot solve the dark and mysterious diffi- culty. Christianity alone unfolds to man the origin of evil in this world, and while it explains the cause, appoints the re- medy. " An enemy hath done this," — and " the seed of the woman shall bruise the serpent's head." We are assured that an evil and malignant spirit superior to man, influenced the mind of man to an act of disobedience. This is the recorded fact, and daily experience conlirms its reasonableness and probabi- lity. Evil is still continued by the same means, by which it ori- ginated. Thousands are hourly misled by one powerful or depraved mind. The sophistries of infidelity, the splendour of ambition, the gold of avarice, are demons all pointing to the for- bidden fruit, to a transgression of the sacred law: and the autho- rity of custom, the fear of ridicule, the false shame of the cow- ardice that dares not difler with the multitude, are all the enemies of our virtue, and poisoners of our happiness. Man tempts man THE APOSTLES rltlrn to JERUSALEM— CHAP. IX. S Julian Pe- 3 To whom also he shewed himself alive after his pas- jeinsalem. v°?' ^^i?' ^^^"' ^y many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty 29. ° ■ ■ — ' to sin: if wicked men, ambitious conquerors, &c. &c. can con- tinue the dominion of evil solely from their superiority of talent (and such has been in every age the history of crime) ; if their own habits of evil were induced by the prior exan)pic of others, act- ing upon minds liable to sin ; is it irrational to believe that the intluencc and mental superiority of an evil being, originated the first crime that contaminated the human race. The causes which continue evil may naturally be supposed to bear some analogy to the cause which primarily produced it ; and no cause is more probable than the influence of mental superiority over a mind capable of error, and endowed with the liberty of choice. Hence we find, " that they who remain in the state, in which the fall left them, are called the children of the devil ; and it is their pleasure to propagate that sin and death which their father introduced. As he was a liar from the beginning, so they are liars against God, as well as man ; he was a murderer, and they are murderers ; he was a tempter, a deceiver, a subtle ser- pent, a devouring lion ; and their works, like his, abound with deceit, enmity, subtlety, avarice, and rapacity. There have been two parties from the beginning, the sons of God, and the seed of the serpent. Their opinions are contrary, and their works contrary. Christianity is at the head of one party, and infidelity at the head of the other. As time is divided into light and darkness, so is the world between these two. The dispute between them has subsisted throughout all ages past, it is now in agitation, and it will never cease till the consummation, when the Judge of men and angels shall interpose to decide it" (a). We are called'upon to believe rather than to fathom these depths of Omnipotence ; and we know, and are assured, that the two great works of the destroyer, sin and death, shall be finally annihilated by the Saviour of mankind, who was revealed from the beginning as the conqueror of evil. But what are the discoveries of infidelity which could super- sede this religion ? What philosopher in ancient days, or what speculator in modern times, who have dared to reject the account of the origin of evil in this world given us in revelation, has been able for one moment to propose any satisfactory ex- planation of this great mystery; or oft'er any thing either to allay its bitterness, or to remove its sting. All is wild and vain conjecture; they know only that evil exists, and they have no remedy whatever for the melancholy conviction, but a gloomy patience without hope of future good, or deliverance from pre- sent sorrow. Shall we go on to the next great event after the birth of the world ? The testimony of revelation has sometimes been rejected in this question also. If, however, the discoveries of our present eminent geologist, and the conclusions of scientific or curious inquirers, both at liome and abroad, may be received as arguments ; there is sulHcient evidence to assure us that at no very remote period, an universal de- luge overspread the whole surface of the globe, the traces of which are every where distinguishable. The traditions of all nations confirm the same truth. Their records in no one in- stance proceed higher than this event ; the chronology of the Egyptians, and the Hindoos, which boasted a more ancient descent, have been long since consigned to oblivion. Let me then put this question, and ask if any invention of natural reli- gion, that vain idol of the imagination, can discover an ade- B 2 4 THE APOSTLES REXtnN to JERUSALEM— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe. days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the king- Jerusalem. riod,4742. domofGod: Vulgar-oira, 29. quale cause for this universal deluge j or does tradition relate any thing concerning it, ^vhich does not confirm the only rational and consistent account which is revealed to us in Scrip- ture (b) ? There is abundant evidence to prove that the most absurd and superstitious ceremonies, and the most inconsistent and irrational theories of the Pagan world, Mere at first useful emblems or remembrances instituted in commemoration of this great event, though they were subsequently perverted ; and every species of idolatry, from the Hindoo to the savage, origi- nated in the corruption of some primaeval truth, revealed to their patriarchal ancestors (c). On this view of the subject, every difficulty respecting the Polytheism of antiquity is solved. AH the mystery of its early origin, and the causes of the institution of barbarous rites and absurd notions respecting the Deity, are easily and satisfacto- rily explained. Let him who rejects Revelation, and yet be- lieves in the power of the unassisted reason of man to frame for itself a consistent system of rational religion, contemplate the history of his species, and account for the incomprehen- sible series of mysterious absurdities he there surveys. Was it not the real, genuine, undoubted majesty of human reason which fully displayed itself when the scientific Chaldean paid his homage to fire, as to a God — when the dignified Persian bowed down to the host of heaven— and the deeply-learned Egyptian acknowledged the divinity of the reptile or the vege- table. If the advocate of the supremacy of human reason would be further gratified, I would refer him to the contemplation of the more northern nations, and bid him there behold its tri- umphs in the massacre of human victims, when the blood- bedewed priest, as in the plains of Mexico, in a subse- quent period, tore the palpitating heart from the still living breast of the sacrifice, and spoke in his mystic augury the will of a ferocious Deity. Human reason proposed the worship of the sword of God Attila, and reveled in the banquet of those warriors, who drank mead from the skulls of their enemies in the halls of Valhalla. Human reason, unincumbered by revela- tion, gradually instructed the passive population of Hindostan to burn their widows, to murder their infants, and to torture their own bodies. Cruelty, lust, and ignorance assumed the place of repentance, faith, and knowledge ; and the conquest of unassisted reason over the mind of man, was consummated in the golden clime of India, till the white horse of Brunswick pas- tured on its fair meadows, and the sons of Japhet forsook the shores of England to overthrow this proud temple of the idol God. We will now consider human reason in its most admired form in the schools of philosophy in Greece, of which the Pythago- rean or Italic was the most distinguished for the reasonableness of its doctrines, the purity of its precepts, and the excellence of its discipline. Among the Pythagoreans was taught the exist- ence of a Supreme Being, the Creator, and providential Pre- server of the Universe — the immortality of the soul, and future rewards and punishments. Though these opinions were blend- ed with many sentiments which are not warranted by Revela- tion, there is certainly much to be admired and wondered at in the systems of Pythagoras. Yet even here, if the advocates ofthe sufliciency of human intellect sliould here feel inclined to tri- umph, they must do so upon Christian principles only ; for it THE APOSTLES return to JERUSALEM— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 12 Then returned they unto Jerusalem from the mount Jerusalem. nod, 4742. Vulgar^ra, ~~ 29. is demonstrable that this great philosopher kindled his faint taper at the ever-burning lire on the holy altar of truth. He conversed, we have reason to believe, with those favoured people who held in their hands the sacred records of Moses and the prophets. For Pythagoras, it is asserted, by all the re- maining evidence, travelled among the Jews in their dispersion both in Egypt and in Babylon, and also with the remnant of them who were left in their own country at Mount Carmel. Before he proceeded on these travels he visited Thales at Miletus, who happened to be in Egypt at the time when Jehoa- haz was brought there a prisoner of war by Pharaoh-Necho (d), with many of his captive countrymen : and these were the two men who founded the Ionic and Italic schools, from which descended all the schools of philosophy in Greece. Their pre- decessors had by no means such clear ideas of a Supreme God and a superintending Providence j and the reason seems to be, that they had no communication with the depositors of truth,' but were embarrassed with the mixed traditions of ancient times, and the stupid idolatry of their own days. Socrates and Plato were the two principal philosophers who next distinguished themselves by their superiority to their countrymen. These seem to have been permitted to shew to the world to what height of excellence the intellect of man could attain, without \ the possession of the inspired volume. Both taught the exist- ence of one God, though both practised the worship of the numerous gods of their country. And such is the superiority of Revelation, that a little child, of our own day, who has been made acquainted with the common truths of Christianity, is a wiser philosopher, and a more accurate reasouer than both of them. If, then, the learned, deeply-reasoning and talented Greek, was notable, by his own powers of reasoning, to frame any consistent code of religion by which to govern himself, or to beuelit man- kind, much less shall we iind that the more modern philosophers, who have ventured to reject Christianity, are more perfect guides, or are favoured with greater discernment. Shall we, for instance, follow Lord Herbert of Cherbury, who assures us that the indulgence of the passions is no greater crime than the quenching of thirst, or yielding to sleep ?— Or shall we believe with Mr. Hobbes, that inspiration is madness, and religion ridi- culous, and the civil law of a country is the only criterion of right and wrong?— Shall we agree with Blunt, the disappointed, self possessed suicide, that the soul is material—or with Lord Shaftesbury, that the Scriptures are an artful invention, that the idea of salvation is absurd, and join in his untranscribable blasphemies against the meek and blameless Jesus ?— Shall the Jew Spinoza direct us, when he teaches us that God is the soul of the world, and not the ruler; but that all things proceed, not from the will or government of an all-wise Creator, but from a necessary emanation from the physical energy of the material universe, the passive fountain of existence? Shall we agree with him that there is no Creator, no i)rovidence, no necessity for worship, nor any well grounded expectation of a future state?— -Or shall we rather become the votaries of Collins and believe that man is a mere machine, and the soul is mate- rial and mortal ?— Or praise, with Tindal and Morgan, and Chubb and Bolingbrokc, the dignity of reason, the excellence of natural religion, professing to admire Christianity, while we deny its doctrines and ridicule its truths ?— If these Hiero- 6 THE APOSTLES return to JERUSALEM— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- called Olivet, which is from Jerusalem a sabbath-day's Jerusalem. 29. phants are not received as our guides into the temple of their natu- ral religion, shall we turn to Gibbon, to pander to our frailties, and lead us to the shrine of vice, " a worthy priest, where satyrs are the gods?"— Or shall we rather submit our intellects to the wisdom of Hume, to learn from him that we cannot reason from cause and efl'ect, and therefore, oh sublime discovery ! the beauty of the visible creation does not prove the existence of God ? or, that experience is our only guide, and therefore miracles are impossible, and not to be credited on any evidence whatever ? If these lights of the world are not to have the honour of conducting us, shall we rather barter our veneration for the Christian Scriptures, for the reveries of Drummond, who would change the Bible into an almanac ; or the still worthier votaries of inlidelity, who are alike distinguished from their countrymen by the double infamy of their politics and their religion ? The good principles of England have rejected the teaching of such men with scorn and contempt. " The elherial light has purged oft" its baser fire victorious." Not even their names shall pollute my pages. In other lands, the follies of the rejectors of Revelation have been known in the misery of mil- lions. These were the men, who professing themselves wise, be- came indeed fools. God with them was the Sensorium of the Universe, or the intelligent principle of nature. They rtyect- ed, therefore, all idea of a Providence, and a moral governor of the world. They ascribed every effect to fate or fortune, to necessity or chance ; they denied the existence of a soul dis- tinct from the body ; they conceived man to be nothing more than an organized lump of matter, a mere machine, an inge- nious piece of clock-work, which, when the wheels refuse to act, stands still, and loses all power and motion for ever. They acknowledged nothing beyond the grave; no resurrection, no future existence, no future retribution ; they considered death as an eternal sleep, as the total extinction of our being; and they stigmatized all opinions different from these with the name of superstition, bigotry, priestcraft, fanaticism, and idolatry (e). Let us now advert, for a moment, to the effects produced by these principles on an entire people , and also on individuals (f). The only instance in which the avowed rejectors of Revelation have possessed the supreme power and government of a coun- try, and have attempted to dispose of human hap))incss accord- ing to their own doctrines and wishes, is that of France during the greater part of the revolution, which it is now well known was effected by the abettors of inlidelity. The great majority of the nation had become infidels. The name and profession of Christianity was renounced by the legislature. Death was de- clared, by an act of the republican governmiMit, to be an eter- nal sleep. Public worship was abolished. The Churches were converted into "temples of reason," in whi(;h atheistical and licentious homilies were substituted for the proscribed service; and an absurd and ludicrous imitation of the Pagan mythology was exhibited, under the title of the Religion of Reason. In the principal church of every town a tutelary goddess was in- stalled, witli a ceremony equally pedantic, frivolous, and pro- fane ; and the females selected to personify this new divinity were mostly prostitutes, who received the adorations of the attend- ant municipal officers, and of the multitudes, whom fear, or force, or motives of gain, had collected together on the occa- sion. Contempt for religion, or decency, became the test of THE APOSTLES return to JERUSALEM— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 13 And when they were come in, they went up into Jerusalem, riod, 4742. an upper room, where abode both Peter and James, VulgarjEra, 29 attachment to the government; and the gross infraction of any moral or social duty was deemed a proof of civism, and a vic- tory over prejudice. All distinctions of right and wrong were confounded. The grossest debauchery triumphed. Then pro- scription followed upon proscription, tragedy followed after trao-edy, in almost breathless succession, on the theatre of France; the whole nation seemed to be converted into a horde of assassins. Democracy and atheism, hand in hand, desolated the country, and converted it into one vast field of rapine and of blood. The moral and social ties were unloosed, or rather torn asunder. For a man to accuse his own father was declared to be an act of civism, worthy of a true republican ; and to neglect it was pronounced a crime, that should be pmushed wiUi death. Accordingly women denounced their husbands, and mothers their sons, as bad citizens and traitors. While many women— not of the dress of the common people, nor of infa- mous reputation, but respectable in character and appearance —seized with savage ferocity between their teeth the mangled limbs of their murdered countrymen. The miseries suffered by that single nation, have changed all the histories of the preced- ing sufferings of mankind into idle tales. The kingdom ap- peared to be changed into one great prison ; the inhabitants converted into felons ; and the common doom of man com- muted for the violence of the sword and the bayonet, the suck- ing boat and the guillotine. To contemplative men it seemed, for a season, as if the knell of the whole nation was tolled, and the world summoned to its execution and its funeral. Within the short space of ten years not less than three millions of human beings are supposed to have perished in that single country, by the influence of atheism, and the legislature of luhdeiity. I well know it will be thought by many, that this part of the sub- iect has been exhausted. But in one sense, it can never be exhausted. The fearful warnings of that dreadful revolution ought to be indelibly impressed upon society, so long as a Sove- reign, or a State, remain in the civilized world. Thus it appears that man has never yet been able, by the mere light of nature, to attain to a competent knowledge of religious truth. Let us now take a difterent view of the subject, and endeavour to shew, by arguments of another kind, how impos- sible it is for him to lay any foundation for such knowledge, other than that which is already laid in the revealed will of From a consideration of the powers and faculties of the human understanding, it is demonstrable that it cannot attain to knowledge of any kind without some external communica- tion. It cannot perceive, unless the impression be made on the organs of perception : it cannot form ideas without percep- tions: it cannot judge without a comparison of ideas: it can- not form a proposition without this exercise of its judgment: it cannot reason, argue, or syllogize, without this previous formation of propositions to be examined and compared. Such is the procedure of the human understanding in the work of ratiocination ; whence it clearly follows that it can, in the first instance, do nothing of itself: that is, it cannot begin its ope- rations till it be supplied with materials to work upon, which materials must come from without : and that the mind unfur- nished with these, is incapable of attaining even to the lowest degree of knowledge. 8 THE APOSTLES return to JERUSALEM— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- and John, and Andrew, Philip, and Thomas, Bartholo- Jerusalem. Vu?'ar!Er*a "^^^» ^^^ jMatthew, James the son of Alpheus, and Simon 29. ^ ' Zelotes, and Judas the brother of James. Without Revelation, therefore, it is certain that man never could have discovered the mind or will of God, or have obtained any knowledge of spiritual things. That he never did attain to it, appears from a fair and impartial state- ment of the condition of the Heathen world before the preaching of Christianity, and of the condition of barbarous and uncivilized countries at the present moment. That he could never attain to it, is proved, by shewing that human reason, unenlightened by Revelation, has no foundation on which to construct a solid system of religion ; that all human knowledge is derived from external communications, and con- veyed either through the medium of the senses, or immediately by divine inspiration ; that those ideas which are formed in the mind through the medium of the senses can communicate no knowledge of spiritual things ; and that, consequently, for this knowledge he must be indebted wholly to Divine Revelation {g). If, then we find, from the very nature of man, as well as from the records of all history, that he has never been able to invent for himself a consistent scheme of religion; if his human reason is utterly incapable of arriving at any satisfactory con- clusions respecting God and his Providence, the nature of the soul, or his own destiny in another state — if all his ideas on these subjects are clearly traceable to Revelation, and as soon as he steps over this boundary he launches at once into the chaos of conjecture and uncertainty; we have the most undoubted evi- dence in our favour, to prove that Revelation was necessary to man, and that he is unable of himself to discover those interest- ing and important truths wliich relate both to his present and future existence; and the decided superiority of Revelation over every other system which the ingenuity or sagacity of man have either invented or proposed, is the hallowed and ratifying seal of its divine origin. Who then will yet refuse to enter * this holy temple of Christianity ? who will still reject the reli- gion of Christ, for infidel philosophy and metaphysical uncer- tainty— for endless and useless theories — for premises without conclusions — death without hope — and a God, without other proofs of his mercy than he has bestowed alike upon the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air ! {a) Jones' (of Nayland's) Works, vol. vii. p. 294. (h) That which the modern speculators call natural religion, is the oflspring of culti- vated minds, thoroughly imbued with an early and extensive Knowledge of religion, and endeavouring, by subtle distinctions, to separate tlie doctrines and duties which could only have been known by revelation, from those which they suppose to be discoverable by tlie power of hii- man reason only. After all the reasonings of Wollaston, Clarke, and others, on this subject, the only point of real importance has been dis- regarded. The question is, whether there has ever been lound a na- tion who have been governed by natural religion; or, whether this natural religion has made any discoveries concerning God, or tiie soul of man, or the nature of the future world, or on any of these sublimer subjects, which are at all comparable to those which are given to us in revelation. Natural religion, (says Faber,) denotes that relijjion which man might frame to himself by the unassisted exercise of his intellec- tual powers, if lie were placed in the world by his Creator, without any commnnication l)eing made to him relative to that Creator's will and at- tributes.— Faber on the Three Dispensations, vol. i. p. 74. (c) See Stillingdeet's Origines Sacra^— Faber's Origin of Pagan Idolatry — Gale's '«';_ Cdurt of the Gentiles — Yosing on Idolatry, and many other treatises, MATTHIAS APPOINTED TO THE APOSTLESHIP— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 14 These all continued with one accord in prayer and Jerusalem. VulgariEra, supplication, with the women, and Mary the mother of 29. Jesus, and with his brethren. SECTION II. Matthias by lot aiipointed to the Apostleshipy in the place of Judas ~. ACTS i. V. 15. to the end. 1 5 And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples, and said, (the number of the names together were about an hundred and twenty.) which fullv prove the truth of this position, {d) See Gale's Court of the Gentiles, Enfield's Origin of Philosophy, and the note in the second volume of the Arrangement of the Old Testament, on this sub- ject, (e) Bishop Porteus's Charge, Tracts 260, 207. Home's Crit. Introd. vol. i. p. 32. (/) Home, vol. i. p. 31—35. {g) Bishop Van Mildert's Boyle's Lectures, vol. ii. p. 68. This is one of the most valuable books ever given to the world. See also Dr. Dwight's ex- cellent Discourses on Infidelity. 2 " From this event many have inferred the right of popular interference in the election of ministers. He indeed must be a superficial reader who draws this conclusion, which an accurate consideration of the history directly invalidates. The election was made under peculiar circumstances, which can never recur; before the platform of the Church was decisively established j before the apostles had received power from on high ; and when their number was confessedly incomplete. If the number of names, which were together about an hundred and twenty, had been designed to comprehend the whole Church of that period, and the women, who followed Christ from Galilee, (and for whose exclusion on this occasion there is no satisfactory reason,) are in- cluded in the number, the eleven apostles and the seventy disci- ples, who would not separate before Pentecost, will form a very considerable part of the congregation. But in the interval be- tween the resurrection and the ascension of our Lord the Church was so numerous, that above five hundred brethren (I Cor. xv.6.) could be collected at one time and place to see him; and the circumstances of his appearance to his disciples were not such as to afford an opportunity of assembling them for a par- ticular purpose, nor would they at this crisis be forward in de- claring themselves, nor is it probable that any of them would return to his home, before the feast, which he came to celebrate at Jerusalem. St. Peter, however, standing up in the midst of the hundred and twenty disciples, that is, of less than a fourth part of the brethren, addressed himself only to the men and brethren, an exclusive salutation of the apostolic college, as some have supposed, but which appears to be an indiscriminate manner of addressing an audience, whether of ministerial per- sons specifically, of disciples generally, or even of Jews and Heathens. Its precise application must be determined from other relative expressions in the apostle's discourse. Now the ^ repeated use of the pronoun US, (Acts i. 17. 21, 22.) in speak- ing of Judas, who was numbered with us; of the men, who have companied with us; of the Lord Jesus going in and oiit among MS, and of his being taken from us ; and of the new can- didate's being a witness with «s of his resurrection, seems to imply in the speaker a peculiar connection and identity of 1 0 MATTHIAS appointed to the APOSTLESHIP— CH AP. IX. Julian Pe- 16 Men and brethren, this scripture must needs have Jerusalem. Vuf'atiS'a ^^^" fulfilled which the Holy Ghost by the mouth of 29. ^^^ ^^' David spake before concerning Judas, which was guide to them that took Jesus. office with the persons whom he was addressing ; and indeed the allusion to the ascension exclusively confines his meaning to the apostles. It is also worthy of remark, that in the ad- dress of the apostles to the multitude of the disciples on the da.y of Pentecost, this particularity of persons is actually ob- served ; Look YE out seven men, whom WE may appoint over this business, (Acts vi. 3.) Again, the apostle sj)eaks of Judas, as having obtained part of this ministry, of this ministry with which you and I are entrusted, and which in the subjoined prayer is described as the ministry and apostleship, or ministry of the apostleship, (Acts i. 17.21.) He speaks likewise in a demonstrative manner of certain persons, who were present, (ver. 21.) and out of whom the election was to be made, as dis- tinguished from those whom he was addressing, and who were * to make the election ; and whom he supposes to be acquainted with the circumstances which rendered it necessary to supply the place of Judas from among those who had been their con- stant companions from the beginning (Acts 1. 22.) To be a witness of the resurrection is an expression frequently appro- priated in the Scriptures to the apostles, and to them alone; and to be made a witness of the resurrection with us, is to be raised to the apostolate with us. It may also bo supposed, that the electors were possessed of equal authority with St. Peter, and placed the same reliance on their own judgment as on his recommendation ; he maintained the necessity of substituting one for Judas, they nominated two candidates, and left the ultimate choice to the Searcher of Hearts ; while in the elec- tion of the deacons seven men were required by the apostles, and seven men were accordingly elected. Hence it may be con- cluded, that the persons whom St. Peter addressed, and who were to elect the candidates, were the apostles themselves. The choice of the electors was however limited ; they were not to elect any new and inexperienced convert, but one of those who had com])anied with them all the time that the Lord Jesus had gone in and out among them, a description highly appropriate to the Seventy ; and if the application to them be admitted, and if it be maintained, in opposition to the preceding argu- ment, that St. Peter's discourse was addressed to them in eon- , nection with the apostles, the natural conclusion will be, that the Seventy nominated, and the apostles approved, and Bar- sabas and Matthias must both be included in the number of "^ the Seventy. But whatever was the capacity of the elec- tors, whether apostles or the Seventy, or both acting in concert, they appointed two; they did not presume to sup- ply the vacancy by the nomination of an individual successor; they did not before the effusion of the Spirit esteem themselves competent to judge of the respective merits of the candidates, whom they proposed ; they commended their case in earnest prayerto God, and left the matter to his arbitration and decision; and with this diffidence in their own judgment, and this refer- ence of the whole aflair to the divine pleasure, it is most in- consistent to suppose, that they would appeal to the opinion of an indiscriminate multitude. The election was concluded by lots, and the lot fell upon Matthias, and in devout acquiescence in the divine preference, without any imposition of hands, which on other occasions was the form of ministerial ordina- i^j^r ^. tb$A^ MATTHIAS APPOINTED to the APOSTLESHIP— chap. IX. 1 1 Julian Pe- 1 7 For he was numbered with us, and had obtained Jerusalem. Vuf 'atS?a P^^* ^^ ^^^^ ministry. ^^ugar ra, 18 Now this man purchased a field with the reward of iniquity ; and falling headlong, he burst asunder in the midst, and all his bowels gushed out. (19 And it was known unto all the dwellers at Jeru- salem ; insomuch as that field is called in their proper tongue, Aceldama, that is to say, The field of blood ^.) tion, he was numbered with the eleven apostles. The infer- ences from this history must he drawn with care and delibera- tion ; the circumstances of the Church were peculiar: St.* Peter's discourse was not addressed indiscriminately to the people ; the powers of the electors were limited, and they were exercised in dependance on the divine will ; the persons elected were persons of experience in the service of the Lord; the ' choice was decided by God, who may have ruled the votes of ^^ the electors not less than the fall of the lots. Matthias there- fore became an apostle by the will not of man, but of God- he was translated from an inferior condition, which was therefore distinct from the superior one to which he was admitted; he was numbered with the eleven by virtue of the divine prefer- ence ; and every trace of popular election, and of ministerial ordination is excluded (a.) Mosheim (&), concludes, from the mode of expression hero adopted by St. Luke, that the successor of Judas was not *) chosen by lot, as is generally supposed, but by the sulTrages of p the people. St. Luke says, kcu JojKav KXijpsg ahruiv ; but Mo- ^ sheim thinks, that if the Evangelist wished to say they cast Al- lots, he would have written Kal 'itaXov x^npov, or KkrjpsQ. But as it is impossible to reason from what the Evangelist ought to have written, rather than from what he has written, we cannot place much confidence in his remarks, particularly M'hen we consider the manner in which the Jews usually express this idea. Their phrase being (see Levit. xvi. 8.) b^D pD. which corresponds to the Greek word KXfjpog, used by tiie apostle; they gave, or cast forth the lot. As the foundation of Mo- sheira's argument is thus removed, it cannot be necessary to / examine his inferences. The correct interpretation of a pas- .. ( _ i\,_ sage of Scripture destroys a whole legion of errors. It was but ' one blow of the axe that chased away the spectres and phan- toms in the enchanted grove of Tasso(c.) (a) Morgan's Platform of the Christian Chnrch, p. 29, &c. (b) Vi- ial's Translation of Mosheim, note, p. 136, vol. i. (c) See Kuinoel, sect. 2. lib. N. T. Histor. Com. in loc. and Schleusner in voc. KXtfpog- ^ This passage, Acts i. 19. ought to be in a parenthesis, ^^.f ^ "^ as being spoken by St. Luke. Esse hunc vebum pro addita- ^ mento Lucae habendum satis dilucide verba ipsa docent. Quor- ;^ ^q \aJ^^ sum enim Petrus Apostolis dixisset, Judje triste fatum omnibus ''*^'^' I ' Hierosolymitanis innotuisse? quam absonc fuisset ctiam voces Akeldama, omnibus prsesentibus satis notas, interpretatio ! Ac- cedit etiam quod ager ille baud dubio hoc nomen successu de- mum temporis accepit. Est igitur hie versus parentheseos nota a reliquis sejungendus, dKeXdafid Syr. Chald. Km bpn ager ca[)dis. sell, cruentus dypbg aiiiarogj Matt, xxvii. 8 (a). (a)Kuinoel Comment. in lib. Hist. N. T. vol.iv. p. 18. See alsoPfeiffer Dubia vexata Cent. 4. on the word Aceldama. Doddridge also, with other critics, places this verse in a parenthesis. 1 2 MATTHIAS appointed to the APOSTLESHIP— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 20 For it is written in the book of Psalms, Let his ha- Jerusalem, riod, 4742. bitation be desolate, and let no man dwell therein : and, Vulgar^ra, ^.^ bigi^^p.ic Jet another take \ 21 Wherefore of these men which have companied with us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us, 22 Beginning from the baptism of John unto, that same day that he was taken up frorp us, must one be ordained to be a witness with us of his resurrection. 23 And they appointed two, Joseph called Barsabas, who was surnamed Justus, and Matthias. 24 And they prayed and said, Thou, Lord ^, which * The word tTravXiQ (habitation,) in this passage corresponds with the Hebrew ni'ta, which signifies the house appointed for the Shepherd who is commissioned to take charge of the fold. Hence it is rendered in the authorized translation by a secon- dary meaning : the original sense of the word, however, would have better expressed the idea of the office and authority which » Judas had abdicated, The first part of the verse is quoted by " St. Peter from Ps. Ixij. 26. and in the Alexandrine version we lind the same word, yevrjOrjTu) rt IttclvKiq avruiv i)pr]iio)fi.evT] Kai kv Tolg (TKtjVMfxacnv ahrdjv jir) arco 6 KaroiKuiv. Hesychius tTravXig — fidvSpa iSoioVf y eiKT)ixa, 17 dvX^, ij <7f)aT0-7redia, Kai ?; TTOiixeviKi) avXij. The word iinaKoirrjv, therefore, ought to be so interpreted, as to correspond with t,he former part of the verse : it implies an office in which the possessor exercises authority, and control over those subject to his charge. ^ That our blessed Redeemer was here addressed in the words " Thou, Lord, who searchest the heart," may be inferred from the fact, that St. Peter had used the term " Lord," (ver. 21, 22.) immediately before this invocation, when he assuredly spoke of 1i the Messiah. In the election of Presbyters afterwards, in the I several Churches, the Apostles commended them " unto the ' Lord, in whom they had believed." (Acts xiv. 23.) That Lord was unquestionably Christ, In the Apocalypse, xi. 23. our Sa- viour expressly and formally assumed the title — " All the Churches shall know, that I am He which searcheth the reins and hearts." Upon this passage of Scripture alone we should be justified in olfering up our prayers to Christ, as " our God, and our Lord," as our only Mediator and our only Saviour. The divinity of Christ appears to me to rest upon this solid and unchangeable foundation; that the inspired writers seem \ -"^ ^!^ * tluougliout the whole of thfeir pages to take it for granted. \ I They are only anxious to prove Jesus of Nazareth to be the ex- pected Messiah, which title implies his divinity; and this point being gained, they consider it as a truth which required no ad- ditional argument. Whenever the course of their reasoning led them lo touch upon the subject of the real nature of the Mes- siah, their very inspiration seems to be insufficient to clothe in adequate language their exalted ideas of His glory. When they attempt to describe Him, it is in the same words as they use when they speak of the Supreme Being. When they address Jesus the Chrisl, the Messiah of the Prophets, the same humble adoration is observed as when Ihey worship God the Father Ahnighl y. The truth of this mode of representing the argument will appear from the following very brief statement of the as- 13 1. 2. A6?a, 3. SoAia, do^a. GO(pia. 4. Ti/i7), 5. AvvaniQf MATTHIAS APPoiNTKD tothk APOSTLESHIP-CIIAP. IX. knowest the hearts of all wzen, shew whether of these two Jerusalem, thou hast chosen, ^^ criptioiis of glory which arc alike applied to the Father Al- mii^hty, and his only Son, our Lord. . The comparison may be illustrated by the following table, given us in a late learned and elaborate work. To God. To Christ. EyXovia, evXoyia. Blessing , the utterance of gra- titude from the universe ot holy and happy beings, for all the divine bestowments. Glory ; the manifestation to intelligent beings of supreme excellence. Wisdom ; the most perfect knowledge combined with ho- liness and efficient power in ordaining, disposing, and actu- ating all beings and events to the best end; and this espe- cially with respect to the sal- vation of mankind. Honour, worth, value, dignity, intrinsic excellence, supreme perfection. Uvauig. Power; ability to effect com- pletely and infallibly all the purposes of rectitude and wis- dom. Might ; power brought into ac- tion. Salvation ; deliverance from sin, and all evil, and bestowment of all possible good. Thanksgiving ; the tribute from those who have received the highest blessings, to the Au- thor of all their enjoyments. . Riches ; the fulness of all good ; j the possession of all the means ; of making happy. Dominion ; supreme power and goodness triumphing over all enmity and opposition. The seven principal perfections are attributed to each. The eighth thanksgiving is given to God, and not to ^brist ; yei there is evidently nothing in this ascription ^^J^P^^'^l^^^ly divine than in the preceding, and the same is applied to Ulirist, in other words, the most full and expressive that can be con- ceived. The remaining two are attributed to Christ, and not to God; a plain proof that the inspired writer was under no apprehension that he might be dishonouring the lather, while ascribing infinite possessions and supreme empire to the bon. On comparison with another passage, we fand the very same notation of worthiness, or dignity attached to the Father and to the Saviour ; in the one case it is, Worthy art thou, O Loi d, to receive the glory and the honour and the power ; and the other, Worthy is the Lamb that was slain, to receive the power and riches and wisdom and strength and honour and glory anU blessings.—See Smith's Messiah, vol. li. part u. p. 5bo. 6. 8. Ewx^pt^''^*^* 9. 10. TljUT/. ttXovtoq' KQCLTOQ' ^ V Vv 14 DESCENT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT— CHAP. IX. "^•^^d^iTis 25 That he may take part of this ministry and apostle- Jerusalem. VulgariEra, ^^'P' ^^^m which Jiidas by transgression fell, that he 29. might go to his own place ^. 26 And they gave forth their lots : and the lot fell upon Matthias ; and he was numbered with the eleven apostles. SECTION III. Descent of the Holy Spirit on the Day of Pentecost''. ACTS ii. 1 — 14. 1 And when the day of Pentecost w^as fully come ^ they were all with one accord in one place ''. ^ Eig Tov TOTTov Tov idiov. If we are right in interpreting the language of the New Testament in the same sense as it was understood by those to whom it was addressed, and no canon of criticism seems more certain, we must adopt the common ren- dering of this passage — " That he might go to his own place." It was a common sentiment among the Jews, that " He that betrayeth an Israelite shall have no part in the world to come." And Lightfoot quotes also another similar expression from Baal Turim, in Num. 24, 2o. " Balaam went to his own place, that is, into hell ;" and from Midrash Coheleth, fol. 100. 4. It is not said of the friends of Job, that they, each of them, came from his own house, or his own city, or his own country, but from his own place, CDVnan ib ivnnDU' Qiprio that is, " from the place provided for them in hell." The gloss is, " from his own place," that is, " from hell, appointed for idolaters." The Alex. MS. reads ciKaiov, instead of i8iov, which would strengthen this interpretation. Many passages from the Apostolic Fathers are quoted by Whitby, Benson, and Kninoel, to prove that this expression was used by them also in this sense. 'ETrei ovv tsXoq to. Trpdynara cx^i? iTTiKHTai to. dvo, bfis o ri Odvarog, Kai t) ^wj), Kai i.Ka'TOQ tig TOV 'iStov TOTTOV fxeWst %wpaa/, (juia igitur res finem habent, incumbunt duo simul, mors, et vita, et unusquisque in proprium locum iturus est.-^Ignatius in ep. ad Magnes. c. 5. and Clemens Rom. ep. 1. ad Corinth, p. 24. ed Wottoni. — Poly- carp in ep. ad Philip, c 9. — Epist. Barnab. sect. 19. After such evidence we may agree with Dr. Doddridge, that the interpre- tation of Hammond, Le Clerc, and (Ecumenius, is very unna- tural, when they explain it of a successor going into the place of Judas. ' . ' • ■^ The sins of man and their evil designs occasioned the con- fusion of tongues; the redemption of man brought with it the revocation ofthat judgment, in the wonderful gifts of the Holy Ghost, which are recorded in this section. In the former in- stance men were leagued together for the purpose of propagating a false religion, but were miraculously frustrated in their plans by the interposition of Almighty God, who rendered them sud- denly unintelligible to each other: in the latter case, when the true religion was to be delivered to the world, and its appointed ministers were assembled, in obedience to a divine command, at Jerusalem, the sentence of condemnation was revoked : the Holy Spirit descended in testimony of the divine truth ; and by a miraculous diffusion of tongues, empowered the meek and lowly of the earth to communicate the glad tidings of salvation « See note, p. 19. => See note, p. 20. DESCENT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT— CHAP. IX. 15 Julian Pe- 2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of Jerusalem. riod, 4742. . 29. " to every nation under heaven." The same miracle that iirst separated mankind, was now made the means of their re-union. All were invited to acknowledge the same God, and again to become members of the one true religion. A sensible demon- stration was given of the manifestation of the presence of the Holy Spirit. ^ It took place before a mixed multitude, assem- bled from every part of the civilized globe, who by this provi- dential arrangement became witnesses of the fact, and specta- tors of the divine commission given to the Apostles. Fire had always been considered by the Jews as an emblem of the visible presence of the Deity ; the people of Israel now saw it descend in the form of cloven tongues, upon the de- spised followers of the crucified Jesus. They saw it descend upon them on the anniversary of the same day, when the law which was to bring them to Christ was first delivered to them : nor could any outward form be more appropriate or figurative to represent the gift and powers it was intended to convey. It likewise intimated to the Jews that God had now appointed the day of Pentecost to be commemorated for the in- troduction of a new law, and a new dispensation, which was solemnly ratified by the efl"usion of the Spirit of God. The glorious covenant of redeeming grace was fully and finally dis- closed ; the Holy Ghost testifying the exaltation and divinity ol Christ, by the accomplishment of the promise which our Lord had given, " This is He that shall testify of me." In his God- head Christ could only be known by the evidence of the Holy Spirit— in his manhood the knowledge of Him was imparted by the testimony of the Apostles. " When we consider (to use the language of an eminent modern divine,) the magnitude ot the commission intrusted to the Apostles, to teach all nations, and their acknowledged incompetency to carry it into eflect, we can thus only be struck with the immense disparity between the end to be attained, and the means by which it was to be accom- The previous conduct of the Apostles during the last trying scenes of our Saviour's life, shews that they were by nature eminently unfit to fulfil the important duties to which they were now called ; the selection therefore of these ignorant and timid men was the best evidence that all human aid was laid aside, and that the Gospel was to be established, not by the " wisdom of men, but of God." Natural means were rejected that spiri- tual things might be made manifest by the Spirit. He, the most energetic of our Saviour's apostles, who on the first appearance of danger shrank from the scrutinizing glance of a servant girl, and three times, even with oaths and curses, denied the Holy One of Israel, now armed with the Spirit of truth and ol power, speaks before the astonished multitude as the ambassador ol God, and in one day added to the newly formed Church three thousand souls. " Is this," says Dr. Heylin, " the illiterate fisherman ? Is this the carnal disciple, who presumed to rebuke his Lord, when he first mentioned the cross to him ? Is this the fugitive, apostate, abjuring Peter?" Nor were the other disciples in any way more distinguished for their courage and firmness. By one Christ was betrayed, and by all deserted and abandoned ; yet these were the men ordained of God to " go into all the world, and to preach the Gospel to every creature." But God's strength was to be made perfect in weakness, and the ordinary and extraordinary inllu- ences of the Holy Ghost descended to supply all the natural 16 DESCENT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where Jerusalem, vul^:^, they were sitting, 29. ^ — deficiencies of the chosen followers of Christ. As men they were commissioned to bear their human testimony to the truth of those facts, of which they themselves had been the eye-wit- nesses ; but of spiritual things, the Holy Ghost was to testify, co-operating with them in their labours, and supplying them with those graces which were only necessary, and therefore limited to the apostolic age. Under the different titles ascribed to the Holy Ghost, they were qualified and prepared to undertake the great work to which they were devoted. " The Comforter" administered to their fearful and pusillanimous nature supernatural strength, fortitude, perseverance, and consolation — " As the Spirit of truth," he illuminated their dark and uncultivated minds, and gave repaired energy to their slow comprehensions, " teaching them all things, and bringing all things to their remembrance." As " the witness" he was continually with them, renewing their corrupt heart and affections, and disposingthem to holiness and purity of life. He endowed them with spiritual gifts, with the word of wisdom, of knowledge, and of faith, and " worked with them, to confirm their word with signs following." (Mark xvi. 20.) These signs may be considered as the more visible extra- ordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit, and were, if we may be allowed to say so, necessary to distinguish the divine wisdom and know- ledge of the apostles, from human acquirements, and from human superiority. In Judea only, their low origin and neg- lected education would either be known or believed ; in other countries some.further testimony was requisite to confirm their important declarations, than that which had wrought such a miraculous change on them at the day of Pentecost. For this purpose, therefore, the " gifts of healing and working of mira- cles" were added to the word of wisdom and knowledge. They possessed the power of restoring the dead to life, and by a word consigned the living to the grave (Acts iii. 9, 10, &c.) their very shadows had virtue in them, and the sick were reco- vered from handkerchiefs that had only touched their persons. Thus was the Gospel established as far as related to the human nature and actions of Christ, by the testimony of man : but to his Godhead by the " testimony of God," (1 Cor. ii. 1.) and by " the demonstration of the Spirit and power." The former was demonstrated by holiness of life, by unrepining martyrdom and patient suffering ; the other by miracle and inspiration. These were the great credentials of our faith, and the hallow- ed evidences on which our holy religion rests. When, however, the Church through these means was established, and the canon of Scripture, through divine knowledge and prophecy, was completed, the necessity for inspiration and miracle gradually ceased. '< But," observes Mr. Nolan, " from these lively ora- cles, the Spirit still speaks the same language which it dictated to the prophets, or the evangelists, whWe the sacred text still perpetuates the remembrance of those miracles which were openly wrought by the apostle and saint, to evince the divinity of our religion. To those who still require inspiration and mira- cles as evidences of its truth, the word of revelation lies open ; and the religion which it details aff'ords the most convincing proofs of su})crnutural intervention; prophecy, of itself, suffi- ciently proclaims the source from whence it sprang ; and Chris- tianity exhibits in its establishment a standing miracle." In DESCENT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT— CHAP. IX. 17 Julian Pe- S And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like Jerusalem. nod, 4742. ^g of f^j.^ ^nd it sat upon each of them : V ulgar^ra, ^ 29. _ the present day the gifts of tongues would be disregarded, and considered as useless when languages may be so easily acquired. Those infidels who now scorn the evidence of prophecy which has declared the glorious triumph of Christianity over all the persecuting opposition of its powerful opponents, and who see it progressively extending over the unconverted world, would in all probability doubt even if a miracle were wrought in their favour. What indeed can be a greater evidence of the truth of Revelation than the living miracle of the perpetual preserva- tion of the Jews, as a distinct body, separated from their fellow men, holding in their hands the Hebrew Scriptures, and bearing testimony of their divine origin, and of their own perverse blindness and condemnation. Of such men I would say, ** though one rose from the dead, yet will they not be per- suaded." The extraordinary gifts of the Holy Spirit being vouchsafed for one especial purpose only, the benefit of the Christian Church ; as soon as that Church was established, and the canon of Scripture completed, were gradually withdrawn. While the ordinary operations, without which no child of Adam can *' be renewed unto holiness," are to be continued for ever, ** even unto the end of the world." This was the consoling and gracious promise our Lord gave to his disciples, before he was visibly parted from them. He informs them of his depar- ture; and at the same time declares, " I will not leave y^ou comfortless, I will come to you :" and again in another Evange- list, '' Lo, I am with you always, even unto the end of the world." This most merciful promise was at first given to the apostles, and through their ministry to the Universal Church ; Christ himself having appointed outward means of grace, by which he has engaged to maintain a constant communion with his Church, through the operations of the Holy Ghost. The spirit of Christ through the Holy Ghost still acts in the admi- nistration of holy orders, in the study of the revealed word, in public and private worship, and in the sacraments, (1 Cor. vi. 11. John vi. 55. 63. Thess. ii. 13. Ephes. v. 25, 26. &c. &c. &c.) These are the means of grace by which the ordinary operations of the Holy Ghost are imparted ; and these are the sources from which alone we have reason to expect those continued and spi- ritual gifts which are essentially necessary to the renovation of fallen man, and his reconciliation with God. Every amiable feeling and aftection, every virtue, and every grace, arc the fruits of the Holy Spirit. He alone, by a secret and internal operation, changes atid transforms the " spirit of our mind,'' and enlarges and improves every faculty of our soul, healing all its sicknesses. He checks the solicitations of sense, counteracts our natural propensities, arms us against the flatteries and allurements of the world, and against those spiritual enemies which are ever on the watch to assail our weaknesses, and to tempt our virtue. " He," to use the words of the eloquent Barrow, *' sweetly warmeth our cold afl'ections, inllaming our hearts with devotion towards God; he qualilieth us, and en- courageth us to approach the throne of grace, breeding in us faith and humble confidence, prompting in us fit matter of re- quest, becoming our Advocate and Intercessor for the good success of our prayers." He is our only Comforter and Inter- cessor on earth — through Him alone we can attain to " that most excellent gift of charity which never faileth, which believ- VOL. II. C 18 DESCENT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT—CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and Jerusalem. riod,4742. VulgariEra, ' ~ ' ^' eth all things, and hopeth all things," surviving the wreck of time, the perfection of man here, and his happiness hereafter (a). A variety of opinions have been advanced respecting this miracle of Pentecost. The most rational and the most general is, that the gift of tongues lasted during the ministry of the apostles ; and as soon as the purpose for which it was given was accomplished, that it was gradually withdrawn. Others contend that it was but temporary, and intended to answer only an immediate purpose j that the miracle was not wrought upon the apostles themselves, but upon the people only, who were suddenly enabled to understand in their own various dialects, the words which were spoken by the apostles in the Galilean language. Others attempt to do away the miracle altogether. Eichhorn suggests, that to speak with tongues, means only, that some of the apostles uttered indistinct and inarticulate sounds^ and those who uttered foreign, or new, or other words, were Jews who had come to Jerusalem, from the remote provinces of the empire, and being excited by the general fervour of the people, united with them in praising God in their own languages. Herder is of opinion that the word y'XCjcrca is used to express only obsolete, foreign, or unusual words. Paulus conjectures, that those who spoke with difierent tongues were foreign Jews, the hearers Galileans. Meyer, that they either spoke in terms or language not before used^ in an enthusiastic manner, or united Hebrew modes of expression, w ith Greek or Latin words. Heinrichsius, or Heinrich, that the apostles suddenly spoke the pure Hebrew language, in a sublime and elevated style. Kleinius, that the apostles, excited by an extraordinary enthu- siasm, expressed their feelings with more than usual warmth and eloquence. Such are the ways in which the modern Ger- man theologians endeavour to remove the primitive andancient belief in the literal interpretation of Scripture. "Thinking themselves wise, they become fools." Learning so perverted by the inventions of paradoxes, which can tend only to darken the light of Scripture under the pretence of illustrating its sacred contents, becomes more injurious to the consecrated cause of truth tlian the most despicable ignorance, or the most wilful blindness. The errors of ignorance, the fajicies of a dis- ordered imagination, the misinterpretations of well intending theories, are comparatively harmless, when contrasted with the baleful light which renders the Scripture useless, by producing doubt in the attempt to overthrow facts. Byrom of Manchester, also, and others, have endeavoured to lessen the force of this miracle, by representing that the influ- ence of the Spirit was not so imparted to the apostles as to enable them to speak in various languages, but that when the apostles addressed the multitude in their native Galilean dia- lect, the Parthians, Medians, &c. who were present, understood them each severally in their own language. It is well remarked by Thilo, that if this had been the case, the words of St, Luke would have been XaXScriv dvTol, ciKsovTUiv r)^iov raig yjfiSTspaig yXiijcrcatg, whereas his expression is XaAsjTwv avruiv rdig iifitrk- paig yXuxTcraig, unde etiam patet, miraculum hoc non fuisse in audientibus, sed in apostolis loquentibus. He then goes on to prove that they spoke successively the various languages of the hearers and spectators of the miracle — they began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance, Ka9djg to TTvevfia tdiSs avroXg (^aTTo-oXoig) dnoipOsyyccrOai, non idida avrolg DESCENT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT— CHAP. IX 19 Julian Pe- began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave Jerusalem, riod, 4742. them Utterance. VulgariEra, 29. ^ {aKpoaralg) eiaaKsaai. B. Schmidius — Syrus, loquebantur lin- gua, et lingua, ic pluribus Unguis (6). (a) See Nolan's Sermons on the Operations of the Holy Ghost ; also Faber on tbe ordinary Operations of the Holy Spirit, being evidences to the authenticity of their own prophecies, (b) Salniasius was of opi- nion that the miraculous gifts lasted but for one day. — See the disserta- tions on this event in the Critici Sacri — Kuinoel Coram, in lib. Hist. N. T. vol. iv. — Nolan on the Holy Ghost, and Faber on the ordinary Operations, &c. &c. &c. ^ The words here used by St. Luke, Kai Iv rw ffvfiTrXrjpQaQai Ti)v r'lukpav rrjg 'TrevTSKO'^rig' are tbus happily translated by B. Dn. Erasmus Schmidt (in not. ad loc.) et cum complctum esset, tempus usque ad diem festum Pentecostes — " And when the time was fulfilled, even up to the day of Pentecost." The Jews reckoned the day of Pentecost to begin fifty days after the first of unleavened bread, which was observed the day after the Paschal Lamb was offered. The law relative to this feast is found in Levit. xxiii. la, 16. Perhaps the Evangelist is thus particular in pointing out the time, on account of the striking analogy that exists between the old and new dispensations in this and other great events. In the former the Paschal Lamb of the Passover was broken, and fed upon, in remembrance of the great deliverance of the children of God from the hands of their temporal enemies, by whom they were detained in bondage and subjection. In the latter at the celebration of this figurative feast, Christ our pass- over was slain to deliver all that would believe on Him from the great enemies of their salvation, Satan, sin, and death, and to rescue their spirits from the unhappy thraldom of these cruel task-masters. He died for us that we might be spiritually fed by his body and blood. In the former dispensation, at the day of Pentecost, God gave his law on Mount Sinai, with thunder and lightning, fire, storm and tempest, with all the awful de- monstrations of an oileuded Deity. In the fulness of time, at the feast of Pentecost God again manifested himseli", and reveal- ed a more perfect law — on both occasions circumstances charac- teristic of the peculiar nature of the law were observed — the same divine power was demonstrated, but in the latter instance robbed of its terrors. On both occasions the presence of God was manifested bythe sound of rushingwindssupernaturally excited, by fire descending from heaven, and as some suppose by thesud- *" den thunder which accompanied the Bath Col. The account of St. Luke is so very brief, that we cannot be certain whether the latter proof of the presence of God was given • but it is the most probable opinion, and is very strenuously defended by Haren- burgh, in the 13th volume of the Critici Sacri (a). At the pa^sover, Christ proved his human nature by submitting to the most ignominious death to which that nature could be exposed: at the day of Pentecost he gave evidence of his divine nature and exaltation, by miracle, and by power, and by fulfilling to the utmost the promise he made to his disciple.': while with them upon earth. (John xiv. 16. 18.) " He humbled himself, that he might be exalted." In the Jewish tabernacle God testified his acceptance of the first sacrifice that was offered on the holy altar by the descent of fire from heaven. When Christ made a sacrifice of bis body on the altar of the cross, thereby abolishing all burnt offerings of bulls and of goats: the apostles, as priests and ministers of his 20 DESCENT OF THE HOLY SPIRIT— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- .5 And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout Jerusalem. v^v^'trMr ^^"' ^^^ of every nation under heaven. ^jigai 'ra, ^ ^^^ vvhen this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. 7 And they were all amazed, and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galileans ? 8 And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born ? 9 Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia, 10 Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes, new covenant, as the living sacrifices acceptable lo God, re- ceived a similar token of divine approbation, l)y fire from heaven resting upon them in the form of iiery tongues. Thus are all the mysteries of Omnipotence shadowed out as " through a glass darkly," and thus may we not suppose that the last reve- lation given to man by St. John, typifies in like manner those eternal realities of the new Jerusalem, of which we can form no higher idea than the Jews of old entertained of the glorious privileges and blessings, of which we are now the happy par- takers in the Christian dispensation. (a) The opinion is principally founded on the words in Acts ii. C. Ttvon'n'TjQ dk Tijg (pcovrig ravTJjg, which both Harenberg and Schoet- gen would render in this manner — (p^viig, verte tonitru. Sic socpe vox bp, in Hebraeo, et vox graeca apoc. 1. 15. x. 3. Sclioetgen refers also to Heinsius, in Aristarcho Sacro, c. 14, and 25. Doddridge defends tlie common translation by observing, that it was not the sound of thunder or rushing wind which collected the people together, but the miracu- lous eflusion of tongues. This, however, must still remain a matter of doubt, as we are only informed in the sacred narrative, that when the multitude came together, they were confounded to hear every man speak. in his own language. ® Various opinions have prevailed respecting the place where this miracle occurred. The temple, tlie house of Mary the mother of John, of Simon the leper, of Joseph of Arimathea, of Nicodemus, have each been alternately fixed upon. This point must ever remain in a great degree a matter of doubt; I am however induced, by the arguments of the celebrated Joseph Mede, to think that this miracle took place in an upper room of some private house, set apart for religious services, rather than in the temple which was so soon to be destroyed, and its figurative service superseded by a spiritual worship and purer discipline. It is not probable that the despised followers of the crucified Jesus should be allowed, as an associated body, to assemble to- gether in the temple, for the purpose of joining in a new act of devotion, by those priests who had so short a time since, been the persecuting instruments of their blessed Master's condem- nation and crucifixion (a). (a) See Sclioetgen and Mede's Dissertation on the Churches of the Apostolic Age. PETER'S ADDRESS TO THE MULTITUDE— CHAP. IX. 21 Julian Pe- 1 1 Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our Jerusalem. Vu?' ^^m' ^^^S^^^ ^^^^ wonderful works of God. 29. '12 And they were all amazed, and were in doubt, say- ing one to another. What meaneth this ? 1 3 Others mocking said, These men are full of new wine ^^. SECTION IV. Address of Peter to the Multitude. ACTS ii. 14 — 36. 14< But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice, and said unto them, Ye men of Judea, and all ye that dwell at Jerusalem ", be this known unto you, and hearken to my words : '° Markland supposes that instead of" these men are lull of new wine," the passage should be read, *' these men are, with- out doubt, under the strong inspiration of the Goddess TXewkw. He would read yXevKovg as derived from yXtvKog, "must." For the sake of ridicule, the person or goddess VXtvKu) (Gen. oogy Sg,) formed as GdWw, Aw|w (Poll. viii. 9. Segm. 10.) is used. So likewise 'Aed'^cj, and Eve'^oj, Dese Politicse. Those who op- posed the apostles intended by this expression to sneer at the mean appearance and obvious poverty of the fishermen of Gali- lee, as no one opened their vessels of last year's yXsvKog, so early as June, unless impelled by necessity (a). This, however, seems to be a strange remark of Markland; the witnesses of the miracle at Pentecost were Jews ; and though some of them who were Hellenists, had resided in Greece or Rome, it does not appear probable that they would make an allusion to the mythology of the heathens in pre- ference to their own traditions. In which they read that there was a demon called Dipmp, which possessed those who were drunk with new wine, which gave the drinker not only wit and gaiety, but the power of speaking other lan- guages (i) ; and to this agent we may justly suppose the Jews would have ascribed the eloquence and lluency of the apostles if they had attempted to account for the effects of the Holy Spirit by any supernatural influence. But as we find that this was not the case, and as the only evidence that a reference was made to the Heathen Mythology can be derived from the word yXei/Kog, the present translation of the passage may be considered, I think, as giving its genuine signification (c). (a) Ap. Bowyer in loc. (b) See Lijfhtfoot, Pitman's edition, vol. viii. p. 377. (c) Hesychius ap. Schoetgen, rXfWKOt;, to dTTorrdyfia Trig '^atpvXijg, Trplv KaT)]Qr], illnd, quod ab uva distillat, antequaui calcetur. See Schoetgen, Horae Hebraicae, vol. i. p. 112. and the Dis- sertation on the word rXtvKogy in the Critici Sacri. " St. Peter here particularly addresses himself to these tVfpot (vcr. 13.) who reproached the apostles as drunkards, to the Jews of Judea and Jerusalem, because those who were assem- bled from distant parts might not have been so well acquainted with the prophecy of Joel, (ii. 28.) which he now declares to have been fully accomplished on this occasion. And he urges upon those who hear him this predicted promise of the Holy Spirit, as a glorious evidence of the exaltation and resurrection of the crucified Jesus, who was " bolii Lord and Christ." Let those who doubt the inspiration of Peter, compare what he now 22 PETER'S ADDRESS TO THE MULTITUDE-CHAP. IX Julian Pe- 15 For tl^se are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing it Jerasalem. ^gar ra, ^^ ^^^ this is that which was Spoken by the prophet Joel ; 17 And it shall come to pass in the last days, (saith God,) I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh : and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams : 18 And on my servants and on my hand-maidens I will pour out, in those days, of my Spirit ; and they shall prophesy : 19 And I will shew wonders in heaven above, and signs in the earth beneath ; blood, and fire, and vapour of smoke : 20 The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before that great and notable day of the Lord come : 21 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved. 22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words ; Jesus of Na- zareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did, by him, in the midst of you, as y,e yourselves also know : 23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel is to what he formerly was, the weak and timid disciple, who deserted and denied his best friend and gracious master. The prophecy of Joel was not only applied by St. Peter to the great effusion of the Holy Spirit j the traditions of the Jews record its reference to the same event, in the days of the Mes- siah. Schoetgcn quotes on this subject the following para- graphs from Tanchuma, fol. 65. 3. and Bammidbar rabba, sect. 15. When Moses placed his hand upon Josliua, the holy and blessed God said mn oH'n, that is, in the days of the Old Tes- tament—one prophet prophesies at one time, but Knn abiy'?, in the days of the Messiah, all the house of Israel shall prophesy, as it is said in Joel ii. 48. Likewise from Midrasch Schochartof in Jalkut Simeoni, part i. fol. 221. 2. and fol. 265. 4. on Numb. xi. 29. The people assembled therefore at the festival of Pentecost, who were acquainted with this prediction and its traditional interpretation, were now the spectators of its actual fuUiimcnt, and were appealed to both by tradition, by prophecy, and mira- cle, to acknowledge the divinity of Christ, and the real nature of his mission. The words " Vast days," in ver. 17, is shewn by Schoetgen to refer to the days of the Messiah, by two references to the Book Zohar, 'Kn^nir avn D*n*n nnnKa Diebus postremis, die sexto, qui est millenarius Septimus, Nn-irrj *n*^ m, quando Messias veniet; nam dies Dei S. B. sunt mille anni (a). Genes. 49. 1. where Jacob said, " I will tell you what shall take place in the latter days"— O'O^n n^-nnxb vocavit ipsos, quia voluit ipsis rcvolarc Kn-u'D VP> finem Messiae (h). (a) Sobar Genes, fol. 13. col. 52. (6) Ibidciu, fol. 126. col. 499. ap. Schoetgen, vol. i. p. 413. PETER'S ADDRESS TO THE MULTITUDE— CHAP. IX. 23 Julian Pe- and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked Jerusalem. riod,4742. hands have crucified and slain: VulgariEra, ^^ Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains of death : because it was not possible that he should be holden of it. 25 For David speaketh concerning him, I foresaw the Lord always before my face ; for he is on my right hand, ' that I should not be moved : 26 Therefore did my heart rejoice, and my tongue was glad ; moreover also my flesh shall rest in hope : 27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell, neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption '-. 28 Thou hast made known to me the ways of life ; thou shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance. 29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with us unto this day. SO Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne ; 31 He seeing this before, spake of the resurrection of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption. 32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses. 33 Therefore, being by the right hand of God exalted, and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed forth this, which ye now see and hear '^ '2 Schoetgen remarks on this passage, that in all the Rabbi- nical writers he has never met with the application of this pas- sage to the Messiah. We have reason, therefore, to suppose it was applied now for the first time. The apostle at the mo- ment of inspiration, when the remembrance of Christ's wonder- ful resurrection was still fresh in the memory of the people, asserts, by that strongest and most irrefragable argument, that this prophecy also related to Christ, and was by him alone ful- filled, for " his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see corruption." The veil (a) that had been so long a period spread over the face of Moses, was now to be gradually with- drawn, and through the Spirit of God spiritual things were to be compared with spiritual. The expression r; yXwcrca /its, in ver. 26, in the original is ren- dered by mi3, my glory— this word is often used for *Ty93, my soul. (a) Auditores apostoli docuerant, accedeate jam testiraonio Spiritas sancti, quod hue usque, velamen Mosis habentes obtectum, nondniu per- spexerant.— Schoetgen, vol. i. p. 414. 13 Bishop Horsley was of opinion that the cloven tongues re- mained upon the apostles after they went down among the peo- ple. This he thinks is alluded to in the expression, '* that which ye now see and hear," vcr. 33. If so, another beautiful 24 UNION OF THE FIRST CONVERTS^CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 34 For David is not ascended into the heavens : but Jerusalem. v°?' '^^t^' ^le saith himself, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou Vulgar/fira, .tit J ' 29. on my right hand, 35 Until I make thy foes thy footstool. 36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assur- edly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. SECTION V. Effects of St. Peter's Address. ACTS ii. 37—42. 37 Now when they heard thisy they were pricked in their heart, and said unto Peter, and to the rest of the apostles. Men and brethren, what shall we do ? 38 Then Peter said unto them. Repent, and be bap- tized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins ; and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost. 39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call. 40 And with many other words did he testify and ex- liort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward gene- ration. ' ' 41 Then they that gladly received his word were bap- tized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. SECTION VI. Union of the first Converts in the Primitive Church. ACTS ii. 42. to the end. 42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doc- trine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. 43 And fear came upon every soul : and many won- ders and signs were done by the apostles. 44 And all that believed were together, and had all things common ; 45 And sold their possessions '^ and goods, and parted them to all men^ as every man had need. analo£^y exists between the giving of the law to Moses, when " the skin of his face shone, while he talked with him," (Exod. xxxiv. 29, 30.) and the communication of the law to the apos- tles, when the fire of heaven again rested upon nxan. '* That this unbounded liberality was not commanded by Si. Peter, is evident from his address to Ananias, Acts v. 4. And that it was not intended as a precedent, is equally clear irom all UNION OF THE FIRST CONVERTS— CHAP. IX. 25 Julian Pe- 46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the Jerusalem. Vul rar/Er'a ^^"^P^^' ^^^ breaking bread from house to house '^, did 29. ' eat their meat with gladness and singleness of heart, the epistles, in which frequent mention is made between the dis- tinction of rich and poor, and frequent exhortations to the wealthy to be rich in good works ; but not the least intimation that they were required to sell their possessions. It must have been a voluntary sacrifice to have made the offering acceptable. '5 In the opinion of the learned Joseph Mede, the words here translated " from house to house," would have been better ren- dered " on the house." In his curious dissertation on the Churches for Christian worship in the apostles' times, he ob- serves : that the early Christians not having stately structures as the Church had after the empire became Christian ; were accus- tomed to assemble in some convenient upper room, set apart for the purpose, dedicated perhaps by the religious bounty of the owner to the use of the Church. They were distinguished by the name'Avcjytov, or Y7rep(pov, (an upper room,) and by the Latins Cgenaculum, and were generally the most capacious and highest part of the dwelling, retired, and next to heaven, as having no other room above it. Such uppermost places were chosen even for private devotions (Acts x. 9.) There is a tradi- tion in the Church that the room in which the apostles were in the habit of assembling, was the same apartment as that in which their blessed Lord celebrated with them the last passover, and instituted the mystical supper of his body and blood for the sacred rite of the Gospel. The same room in which on the day of his resurrection he came and stood in the midst of his disci- ples, the doors being shut, and having shewn them his hands and his feet, said, " Peace be unto you," &,c. (John xx. 21.) The same in which eight days (or the Sunday after,) he appear- ed in a similar manner to them being together, to satisfy the in- credulity of Thomas, and to shew him his hands and his feet. The same hallowed spot where the Holy Ghost descended, im- parting to them wisdom, faith, and power. The place where James, the brother of our Lord, was created by the apostles Bi- shop of Jerusalem : the place where the seven deacons, whereof St. Stephen was one, were elected and ordained : the place where the apostles and elders of the Church at Jerusalem held that council, the pattern of all councils, where the first contro- verted point was decided : and afterwards the place of this Cx- naculum was inclosed with a goodly Church, known by the name of the Church of Sion, upon whose top it stood, to which St. Jerome, in his Epitaphium Paulai (Epist. 27.) applies those words of the Psalmist, " Her foundations are in the holy mountains ; the Lord loveth the gates of Sion more than all the dwellings of Jacob," Ps. Ixxxvii. 1,2. St. Cyril, Bishop of Jerusalem, calls it the upper Church of the apostles, and he states, " the Holy Ghost descended upon the apostles in the likeness of fiery tongues, here in Jerusalem, in the upper Church of the Apos- tles."— Cyril Hierosol. Cat. 16. Should the tradition be true, it is evident that this Caenaculum from the time that our blessed Saviour first hallowed it, by the institution and celebration of his mystical supper, was devoted to a place of prayer, and holy assemblies. And thus perhaps should that tradition, which the venerable Bede mentions, be understood ; that this Church of Sion was founded by the apostles : not that they erected the structure, but that the building from the time it was made a 26 A CRIPPLE HEALED BY ST. PETER, &c.— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 47 Praising God, and having favour with all the peo- Jerusalem. v^l'^^m' P^^' ^"^ ^^^^ ^^^^ added to the church daily such as 29, ^^^ ^^' should be saved. SECTION VII. A Cripple is miraculously and puhlicly healed hy St. Peter and St. John. ACTS iii. 1 — 11. riod^^irls. 1 '^ow Peter and John went up together into the temple VulgariEra, at the hour of prayer, being the ninth hour. 30. Caenaculum by our Saviour, was by his apostles dedicated to a house of prayer. The Greek word kut olicov, used in this passage (vcr. 46.) and rendered in our translation '* house to house," may be in- terpreted like Iv oiKiOy "in the house;" and we find it is so rendered both by the Syriac and Arabic, and likewise by the New Testament in other places, Rom. xvi. 3 — 5. 1 Cor. xvi. 19. Coloss. iv. 15. Philemon i. 2. And we, moreover, find this Caenaculum called OiKot;, in xae second verse of this chapter. And the same phrase, hreaMiig of bread, is used a little before in the 42d verse, which is wont to be understood of the commu- nion of the Eucharist; and by the Syriac interpreter is ex- pressly rendered by the Greek word fractio eticharisHcB ; and again at chap.xx. ver. 7, according to that of St. Paul, the bread which ive break, &c. Why should it not then be so used here ? And if this interpretation is admitted, it follows that the passage in question must be intended to signify, that when the apostles had performed their daily devotions in the temple, at the accustomed times of prayer, they immediately retired to this Caenaculum, or upper room, where, after having celebrated the mystical banquet of the holy eucharist, they afterwards took their ordinary and necessary repast with gladness and singleness of heart. It further proves, that the custom of the Church to participate the eucharist fasting, and before «lin- ner, had its beginning from the first constitution of the Chris- tian Church. When we consider even to our own day how many spots tradition has transmitted to us as the scene of some eventful his- tory, I cannot but receive the hypothesis of the excellent Mede as probable, and consistent with reason and Scrfpture. Wo know that the oak of Mamre was venerated till the days of Constantino, and can we say it is not probable that the se- pulchre of the Son of God — the last room that he visited — which he consecrated by his presence after the resurrection, and by the descent of the Holy Spirit, in testimony of his ex- altation, should not be commemorated by his devout and faith- ful followers ? Who doubts that Edgar was killed at Corfe Castle, or William Rufus in the New Forest ? The particular spots where the martyrs were burnt at Canterbury, in Smith- field, and at Oxford, are still pointed out by tradition : and many instances of a similar nature might be collected from the histories of every country. Whence then arises the supposed improbability, that the early Christians would cherish the memory of the wonderful events in which they were so deeply interested (a.) (a) See the whole Disserttition in Mode's Works, p. 321, &c. PETER AGAIN ADDRESSES the PEOPLE-CllAP. IX. 07 Julian Pe- 2 And a certain man, lame from his mother's womb, Jerusalem, riod, 4743. ^^g carried, whom they laid daily at the gate of the 3q" gar ra, ^^^pj^ ^yhich is called Beautiful, to ask alms of them that entered into the temple ; 3 Who seeing Peter and John about to go into the temple, asked an alms. 4 And Peter, fastening his eyes upon him, with John, said, Look on us. 5 And he gave heed unto them, expecting to receive something of them. 6 Then Peter said. Silver and gold have I none ; but such as I have give I thee : In the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth rise up and walk. 7 And he took him by the right hand, and hfted him up : and immediately his feet and ancle-bones received strength. 8 And he leaping up, stood, and walked, and entered with them into the temple, walking, and leaping, and praising God : 9 And all the people saw him walking and praising God: 10 And they knew that it was he which sat for alms at the beautiful gate of the temple : and they were filled with wonder and amazement at that which had happened unto him. 1 1 And, as the lame man which was healed held Peter and John, all the people ran together unto them in the porch that is called Solomon's, greatly wondering. SECTION VIII. St. Peter again addresses the People. Acts iii. 12 to the end. 1 2 And when Peter saw it, he answered unto the peo- ple. Ye men of Israel, why marvel ye at this ? or why look ye so earnestly on us, as though by our own power or holiness we had made this man to walk ? 13 The God of Abraham, and of Isaac, and of Jacob, the God of our fathers, hath glorified his Son Jesus, whom ye delivered up, and denied him in the presence of Pilate, when he was determined to him let go. 14 But ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and de- sired a murderer to be granted unto you ; 15 And killed the Prince of life, whom God hath raised from the dead ; whereof we are witnesses. 16 And his name, through faith in his name, hath made this man strong, whom ye see and know : yea, the faith which is by him hath given him this perfect soundness in ^he presence of you all. 28 PETER AGAIN ADDRESSES the PEOPLE— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 17 And now brethren, I wot that through ignorance ye Jerasalem. Vuf 'arSa ^^^ ^^' ^^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^"^^^^ ''• 3o! ^^^^ ^^' 18 But those things, which God before had shewed by the mouth oi" all his prophets, that Christ should suffer, he hath so fulfilled. 1 9 Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing ^^ shall come from the presence of the Lord ; *^ It seems difficult to interpret these words in their literal sense, when we remember the numerous miracles of our Lord, and the abundant proofs the Jews received, that he was their promised Messiah, The ayvoia here referred to, would be better rendered by the word, error, or prejudice, as Whitby proposes. Lightfoot again endeavours to shew that the igno- rance here spoken of, consisted in their mistake of the place of our Lord's birth, and in their expectations of a temporal, in- stead of a spiritual kingdom. Wolfius would point the passage differently; he thinks the expression (baTrep kuI o'l dpxovTtg vficSv, refers not to dyvoiav, but to sTrpd^aTe, and the meaning is, therefore, scio vos ignorantiam adductos, ut faceretis, sicut duces vestri, scil : tirpaiav. It is my opinion that St. Peter, in this passage, intended to intimate to the Jews that their con- duct and condemnation of the Holy Jesus proceeded from their ignorance of their own prophets, with whom they ought to have been better acquainted. The following verse corroborates this interpretation (a). (a) Wolfius, ap Kuinoel. Comment in lib. hist. vol. iv. p. 121. Other explanations are gjven by Kuinoel, but as they appear very forced, they are omitted. *^ The words, ** when the times of refreshing shall co7ne,'* commentators suppose should be rendered, " when the times of refreshing may come." This opinion is defended by the follow- ing parallel passages, where the same word oTrcjg dv is used : Ps. ix. 14. oTrajf dv k^ayykiKo) — the Hebrew is, mSDN ]yDb, '' That I may shew forth, &,c. Psa. xcii. 8. ottw^ dv IKoXoOpev- OdHai. Heb. VDiri^i/rib, That they may be destroyed for ever, Ps. cxix. 101. oTTiog dv (pvXd^b). Heb. iiotrx ^yob. That I might keep. Acts XV. 17. oTTMg dv lKZijTT]7. {(() See the treatise on the i)assage in the 13th vol. of the Critici Sacri, p. 439, iScc. to Fa- gius's lleniarKs, vol. ii. p. 123, and to the frequent notices of the same text in Limborch's arnica collatio cum erud : Juda-o. PETER'S ADDRESS TO THE SANHEDRIM— CHAP. IX. S.! Jalian Pe- and Alexander, and as many as were of the kindred of Jerusalem. riod, 1743. i]^q high priest, were gathered together at Jerusalem 21. 30' S^i'^". ^ ^^^ ^^i^Q^ tl^ey had set them in the midst, they ask- ed, By what power, or by what name, have ye done this? '_ SECTION X. ;S'^. Peters Address to the assembled Sanhedrim, ACTS iv. 8 — 22. S Then Peter, filled with the Holy Ghost, said unto them, Ye rulers of the people, and elders of Israel, 9 If we this day be examined of the good deed done to the impotent man, by what means he is made whole ; 10 Beit known unto you all, and to all the people of '■^^ Tlie names of the pastors here mentioned shew us the powerful opposition against which the infant church had to contend. The Sanhedrim — the aged Ananus, or Annas, wh(» by his influence secretly directed every public measure, and as many as were of his kindred, were gathered together against them. The John and Alexander here spoken of, appear to have been next to Annas and Caiaphas, the principal and most eminent persons in Jerusalem. John, according to Lightfoot, is probably no other than Rabban Johanan, the son of Zaccai, frequently mentioned in - the Talmuds. It is said of him, that he had been the scholar of Hillel, and was president of the council after Symeon, tiie son of Gamaliel, who perished in the destruction of the city, and that he lived to be a hundred and twenty-three years old. A remarkable saying of his, spoken by hiin not long before his assembling with the rulers and elders, mentioned Acts iv. is re- lated in the Jerusalem Talmud thus : Forty years before the destruction of the city, when the gates of the temple flew open of their own accord, Rabban Johanan, the son of Zaccai, said, *'0 temple, temple, why dost thou disturb thyself? I know thy end, that thou shalt be destroyed; for so the prophet Ze- chariah has spoken concerning thee, ' Open thy doors, O Le- banon, that tiie fire may devour thy cedars.' " He lived to see the truth of what he had foretold (a). Tlte Alexander here mentioned, is supposed by some learned men (b) to be Alexander the alabarch, or governor of the Jews, wlio dwelt in Egypt: and were he at Jerusalem at the time, as it is very possible he might, nothing would be more pro- bable. For the assembly here spoken of does not seem to be the ordinary council of the seventy-one, but an extraordiuiiry coun- cil, composed of all the chief men of the Jewish nation, from every part of the world, who happened then to be at Jerusalem ; and several such, it is likely, there might be upon the account of some feast. Josephus says of this Alexander, that he was the noblest and richest of ail the Jews in Alexandria of his time, and that he adorned the nine gates of the temple at Jerusalem with plates of gold and silver (c.) (a) Vid. Lightfoot, vol. i. p. 209, and p, 277, 282. vol. ii. p. 652. (6) Baron. Annal. xxxiv. p. 224. Lightfoot, vol. i. p. 277, and 760. (c) Antiq. 1. xviii, c. 7. §. 3. fin. 1. 19. c. 5. ^. I. tin. 1. 20. c.-l. $. 2. and de Bell, i. 5. c. H. §. 3. See Biscoe on the Acts, and Schoetgen, vol. i. p. 420. D 2 36 LIBERATION OF PETER AND JOHN— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Jerusalem, v**? ' ^^^^' ^^^^ y^ crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even ^u gar ra, ^^ ^^.^ ^^^^ ^^^.^ ^^^ Stand here before you whole. 11 This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner. 12 Neither is there salvation in any other : for there is none other name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved. 13 Now when they saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled ; and they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus. 14 And beholding the man which was healed standing with them, they could say nothing against it. 15 But when they had commanded them to go aside out of the council, they conferred among themselves, 16 Saying, What shall we do to these men? for that indeed a notable miracle hath been done by them is ma- nifest to all them that dwell in Jerusalem ; and we cannot deny it. 17 But that it spread no further among the people, let us straitly threaten them, that they speak henceforth to no man in this name. 18 And they called them, and commanded them not to speak at all nor teach in the name of Jesus. 19 But Peter and John answered and said unto them, Whether it be right in the sight of God to hearken unto you more than unto God, judge ye*^ 20 For we cannot but speak the things which we have seen and heard. 21 So when they had further threatened them, they let them go, finding nothing how they might punish them, because of the people ; for all men glorified God for that which was done. 22 For the man was above forty years old on whom this miracle of healing was shewed. SECTION XI. The Prayer of the Church at the Liberation of St. Peter and St. John, ACTS iv. 23—31. 23 And being let go, they went to their own company, and reported all that the chief priests and elders had said unto them. 24 And when they heard that, they lifted up their 22 Sec the dissertation on this text among the tracts bound up in the 13th vol. of the Critici Sacri. De limitibus Obsequii Humani. By Samuel Andreas, or Andre, or Andrews. P. 595 —604. THE UNION OF THE CHURCH— CHAP. IX. 37 Jnlian Pe- voice to God witli one accord, and said, Lord, thou art Jerusalem. Vufgat^Er'a ^°^' ^'^^^^ ^^^^ ™^^^ heaven and earth, and the sea, 30. ' and all that in them is ; 25 Who by the mouth of thy servant David hast said, Why did the heathen rage, and the people imagine vain things ? 26 The kings of the earth stood up, and the rulers were gathered together against the Lord, and against his Christ. (27 For of a truth, against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles and the people of Israel, were gathered to- gether, 28 For to do whatsoever thy hand and thy council de- termined before to be done '^.) 29 And now. Lord, behold their threatenings : and grant unto thy servants, that with all boldness they may speak thy word, 30 By stretching forth thine hand to heal : and that signs and wonders may be done by the name of thy holy child Jesus. 31 And when they had prayed, the place was shaken where they were assembled together ; and they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and they spake the word of God with boldness. SECTION XII. The Union and Munificence of the Primitive Church, ACTS iv. 32 to the end. 32 And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul ; neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own : but they had all things common. S^ And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus : and great grace was upon them all. 34 Neither was there any among them that lacked : for as many as were possessors of lands or houses, sold them, and brought the prices of the things that were sold, ^ ^vvr}x9riand its only right interpreters on these matters, the early Fathers. (a) Lightfoot's Works, vol. iii. p. 182. Pitman's edition, {h) Haores. p. 50. sect. 4. ap. Whitby, (c) Ita ordo quidam in Ecclesia singularis jam turn irapositione manuum institutus est. Actus quidera, ad quam instituti sunt, nihil aliud est, quam diaKovfiv rpairkZaig, et constituti sunt IttI Tavrrjg Trjg XP^^"^> 4"^ consistebat h' rrj diaKovia rij KaOrjixtpivij. Ofllicium tanien non fuit mere civile, aut CECOnomicum, sed sacrum etiam, sive Ecclesiasticum. MenscC enim Discipulorum tunctemporis communes, et sacrae etiam fuere ; hoc est in communi couvictu Sacramentum EucharisliiE celebrabant, &c. — Pearsoni in Acta Apostol. Lectione, p. 53. Schoetgen has decided in favour of the opi- nion which is apparently best supported by Scripture, that the deacons were of two kinds, of tables, and of the word. The deaconsbip or ministry of tables ceased after the first dispersion, and Philip then re- sumed the deaconship of the word. Post dia!irt of this disconrsp, that BEFORE THE SANHEDRIM— CHAP. IX. 5 Julian Pe- 3 And said unto him, Get thee out of thy country, and Jerusalem. riod^4746, fj-Q^^ ^\^y kindred, and come into the land which I shall or 4<47. I ^1 Vulgar^Era, shew thee. 33 or 34. 4 Then came he out of the land of tlie Chaldeans, and dwelt in Charran : and from thence, when his father was dead, he removed him into this land, wherein ye now dwell. 5 And he gave him none inheritance in it, no, not so 7nuch as to set his foot on : yet he promised that he would give it to hihi for a possession, and to his seed after him, when as yet he had no child. 6 And God spake on this wise, That his seed should sojourn in a strange land •, and that they should bring them into bondage, and intreat them evil four hundred years ^^ the object St. Stephen had in view, was to represent to his countrymen the nature of Christ's religion, and to set before them in the most touching manner his sufferings, and their own conduct, which was an aggravated completion of the crimes of their ancestors. For which, says the martyr, with indignant- eloquence, which of the prophels have not your fathers perse- cuted ? and they have slain them which shewed before of the coming of the Just One; ofv/hom ye have been now the be- trayers and murderers. The truth andjusticeof the dying Ste- phen's appeal was too severely avenged, and too bitterly felt for the Jews not to have had a perfect knowledge of its intention and individual application ; and unless it is considered in tfiis light, it will he dillicult to account for the powerful sensation it occasioned (a). The destruction of the Jewish temple imparts this impressive lesson to every Christian nation and individual, that the true- ness of a Church does not constitute its safety, but that the con- tinuance of the divine blessing is only secured by the mainte- nance of a pure faith and consistent conduct. The temple itself was to be esteemed and valued as the habitation of the Divine presence, making the building holy— in the same way that our bodies are sanctiiied and purified, and are made the temples of the Holy Ghost, by the indwelling spirit of grace within us. If with the Jews, as individuals, we resist the holy influences of God, his presence will be withdrawn from us, and we shall bring down upon our earthly tabernacle the same fearful and inevita- ble destruction, which was poured down upon the temple of Je- rusalem. We shall be delivered over to the hand of the enemy. (rt) See Jones's admirable letter to three converted Jews, vol. vi. p. 212. 2^ In Exodus xii, 40. it is said the Israelites were to be so- journers four hundred and thirty years, reckoning from Abra- ham's leaving Chaldea, when the sojourning began ; here four hundred years is mentioned, reckoning from the birth of Isaac, thirty years after Abraham's dej)arture from Chaldea.— See Gen. XV. 13. and Josephus Antiq. ii. lo2. and ix. I. Markland ap. Bowyer would read this verse in the following manner — that his seed should sojourn in a strange land (and that they should bring them into bondage, and intreat them evil,) four hundred years. He observes it seems to be St. Ste- phen's purpose to relate how long they were to bo sojourners, and in a foreign country ; rather than how long they were to 56 SPEECH OF ST. STEPHEN Julian Pe- 7 And the nation to whom they shall be in bondage Jerusale or'*4747^^' will I judge, said God : and after that shall they come ValgariEra, forth, and serve me in this place. 33 or 34. 8 And he gave him the covenant of circumcision. And so Abraham begat Isaac, and circumcised him the eighth day ; and Isaac begat Jacob ; and Jacob begat the twelve patriarchs. 9 And the patriarchs, moved with envy, sold Joseph into Egypt : but God was with him, 10 And delivered him out of all his afflictions, and gave him favour and wisdom in the sight of Pharaoh king of Egypt ; and he made him governor over Egypt and all his house. 1 1 Now there came a dearth over all the land of Egypt and Chanaan, and great affliction : and our fathers found no sustenance. 1 2 But when Jacob heard that there was corn in Egypt, he sent out our fathers first. 1 3 And at the second time Joseph was made known to his brethren ; and Joseph's kindred was made known unto Pharaoh. 14 Then sent Joseph, and called his father Jacob to ^ him, and all his kindred, threescore and fifteen souls. 15 So Jacob went down into Egypt, and died, he, and our fathers, 16 And were carried over into Sychem, and laid in the sepulchre that Abraham bought for a sum of money of the sons of Emmor the father of Sychem ^^ be in bondage and afllielion, which they were not four hun- dred years: they were in Egypt only two hundred and fif- teen. The parenthesis is the same as if it had been Kai avrb dovXioOijatTai, Kai KaKioOrjcnTai, which is very common : dovXu). rrovaiv relates to the Egyptian treatment ofthe Israelites ; kokw- aovaiv, to that they met with in Canaan, previous to the famine which compelled them to go into Egypt. The covXuxtiq is very plainly distinguished from the KUKujcnQ'm the next verse. This opinion incidentally corroborates the interpretation given to Stephen's address. See last note. ^5 Of the two burying places of the Patriarchs, one was in • Hebron, which Abraham bought of Ephron, Gen. sxiii. 16. (not as here said of the sons of Emmor) ; the other in Sychem, which Jacob (not Abraham) bought of the children of Emmor, Gen. xxxiii. 19. Jacob was buried in the former, which Abra- ham bought; the sons of Jacob in the latter, which Jacob bought. There are many ways of reconciling these discrepan- cies : Bishop Barrington would point the 15th and 16th verses thus — Kai tTtXtvTrjcrev avroQ, Kai ot TrarkptQ yfnoVf Kai fitriTi9i](rav tig 2i»xfc/i* Kai kHOrjcav iv Tip fivrj/iariy o MVijCFaro 'A^paajx. k. t. X. Markland is also of the same opinion. Dr. Owen states, the Old Testament history leads us to conclude that Stephen's account was originally this — " So Jacob went down into Egypt, and there died, he and our fathers ; and our fathers Avere carried ovrr into Sychon}, and laid in the sepulchre," o m'rjaaro Tiii))g BEFORE THE SANHEDRIM-^CIIAP. IX. 57 Julian Pe- 1 7 But when the time of the promise drew nigh, which Jerusalem. or*'4747^^' ^^^ ^^^ sworn to Abraham, the people grew and multi- Vulgar^ra, plied in Egypt, 33 or 34. 18 Till another king arose, which knew not Joseph. 19 The same dealt subtilly with our kindred, and evil entreated our fathers, so that they cast out their young children, to the end they might not live. 20 In which time Moses was born, and was exceedino" fair, and nourished up in his father's house three months : 21 And when he was cast out, Pharaoh's daughter took him up, and nourished him for her own son. 22 And Moses was learned in all the wisdom of the Egyptians, and was mighty in words and in deeds. 23 And when he was full forty years old, it came into his heart to visit his brethren the children of Israel. 24 And seeing one of them suffer wrong, he defended him, and avenged him that was oppressed, and smote the Egyptian : 25 For he supposed his brethren would have under- stood how that God by his hand would deliver them : but they understood not. 26 And the next day he shewed himself unto them as they strove, and would have set them at one again, say- ing. Sirs, ye are brethren ; why do ye wrong one to ano- ther ? 27 But he that did his neighbour wrong thrust him away, saying. Who made thee a ruler and a judge over us? 28 Wilt thou kill me, as thou didst the Egyptian yesterday ? apyvpiov, which he (Jacob) had bought for a sum of money of the sons of Emmor, the father of Sychem. Markland supposes, that putting- a comma at apyvpiov, and irapa being interpreted from, may solve the difficulty, and would read — " And were carried over to Sychem : and afteuwards from among the descendants of Emmor the father, or son of Sychem, they were laid in the sepulchre which Abraham had bought for a sum of money." This reconciles St. Stephen's account with that which Josephus (Antiq. ii. 8.) relates of the Patriarchs, viz. that they were buried in Hebron, being carried out of Egypt, where they died, first to Sychem, and from Sychem to Hebron, to the sepulchre which Abraham had bought. It scarce needs proof that irapa with a Gen. expresses motion from, as d7rtSr]~ fiijtra^ Trap' yfxojv, peregre a nobis profectus es, Lucian Hermot. p. 528. and k^fjXOov Trapd tov rrarpbg, John xvi. '28. The lan- guage hints that the translation of the Patriarchs from Sychem to Hebron was made after the time of Emmor, under some of his descendants, Trapa riov v'laiv 'Efiixop. Sychem, the person here spoken of, might perhaps have his name from the city near which his father iivv.;^ ; but is mentioned here only incidentally, having nothing at all to do with the narration.— See Gen. xlix. 29, &,c. For the other illustrations of this j)assage,see Bowycr's Crit. Conjectures, p. 340, &c. and Elslcy, vol. iii. p. 232. or 58 SPEECH OF ST. STEPHEN Julian Pe- 29 Then fled Moses at this saying ; and was a stranger Jerusalem. ^^^a-aJ"^^' in the land of Madian, where he begat two sons. Vulgar^ra, 30 And when forty years were expired, there appeared 33 or 34. to him in the wilderness of Mount Sina an angel of the Lord, in a flame of fire in a bush. 31 When Moses saw it, he wondered at the sight : and as he drew near to behold it, the voice of the Lord came imto him, 32 Saying, I am the God of thy fathers, the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. Then Moses trembled, and durst not behold. 33 Then said the Lord to him. Put off thy shoes from thy feet : for the place where thou standest is holy ground. S4 I have seen, I have seen the affliction of my people which is in Egypt, and I have heard their groaning, and am come down to deliver them. And now come, I will send thee into Egypt. 35 This Moses, whom they refused, saying. Who made thee a ruler and a judge ? the same did God send to be a ruler and a deliverer, by the hand of the angel which ap- peared to him in the bush. 36 He brought them out, after that he had shewn won- ders and signs in the land of Egypt, and in the Red Sea, and in the wilderness forty years. 37 This is that Moses which said unto the children of Israel, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me ; him shall ye hear. 38 This is he that was in the church in the wilderness, with the angel which spake to him in the Mount Sina, and with our fathers ; who received the lively oracles to give unto us : 39 To whom our fathers would not obey, but thrust him from them, and in their hands turned back again into Egypt, 40 Saying unto Aaron, Make us gods to go before us : for as for this Moses which brought us out of the land of Egypt, we wot not what has become of him. 41 And they made a calf in those days, and offered sa- crifice unto the idol, and rejoiced in the works of their own hands. 42 Then God turned, and gave them up to worship the host of heaven : as it is written in the book of the pro- phets, O ye house of Israel, have ye offered to me slain beasts and sacrifices by the space of forty years in the wilderness ? 43 Yea, ye took up the tabernacle of Moloch, and the star of your god Remphan, figures which ye made to BEFORE THE SANHEDRIM— CHAP. IX. 59 Julian Pe- worship tliem ^' ; and I will carry you away beyond Ba- Jerusalem, riod 4746, ^ylon. or 4747. ./ yulg^TJEra, 37 St, Stephen here alludes to a passage in the book of Amos, 33 or 34. chap. v. 26. which is reiid(M-e(l with some variation in the Sep- tuagint. The words of the orij>inal in our Hebrew Bibles are — They are thus translated — Have ye ollerod unto me sacrifices, and oflerings in the wilderness forty y« ars, O house of Israel ? 26 But ye have borne the tabernacle of your Moloch, and Chiun your images, the star of your God, which ye made for yourselves. By the Septuagint — M?) (j(payia kuI Qvautg TrpoffTjvkyKUTe fioi oIkoq 'icrpariX Tiaaa^aKovTa trt] ev rr'j Iprjiiuj ; Kai dvaXcitere tt/jv aKt]vri%> tS MoXo^, kcu to (5:c. (/) Woltius Curae Philological, vol.ii. p. 1125. Joseph. Antiq. xx. 5. 2. ^^ It is the custom at present among njany who profess Chris- 34 74 PETER REPROVES SIMON MAGUS— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- SECTION XXYII. Samaria. Vniear/Era ^^' ^^^^^ reproves Simon Magus. Acxs viii. 18 — 24. 1 8 And when Simon saw, that through laying on of tianity, to despise every ordinance of which they do not per- ceive the evident utility. They must comprehend the causes and the reasons of an institution, or it is treated with contempt. In all enactments of merely human origin this conduct is defen- sible, because experience proves to us that human laws are made to accomplish some known and definite benefit j and if they fail in that object, they are considered useless. Yet no human legislature will permit its laws to be disobeyed with im- punity, even in those cases where they have evidently failed in their purpose ; for the will of an individual is required to sub- mit to the authority of the State : and there are few cases in which the resistance of an individual can be justified upon the plea, of his inability to discover the reasonableness or propriety of a law. If we are thus required to act in matters of common life, the same principles of conduct, are more binding when applied to the divine law. We are in general able to discover the causes for which it pleased God to appoint to the Jew the observances of the Mosaic law, and to the Gentile the lighter yoke of the Christian code. The divinity of both covenants was ratified and confirmed by miracle and prophecy, and man in both in- stances, without any appeal being made to his reason, was re- quired to yield unreserved obedience, because it was the will of God ; for, as the apostle says, we walk by faith, not by sight. One very remarkable characteristic alike distinguishes the Mosaic and Christian institutions : in both it is to be observed, that although on any peculiar and extraordinary occasion the supernatural influences of the Holy Spirit might be imparted to some favoured individuals ; they were never bestowed in ordi- nary cases, unless the appointed means of grace were observed on the part of the worshipper: thereby affording the highest sanction in favour of the outward ordinances, both of the Jewish and Christian religion. If in the former dispensation the penitent would intreat for pardon, he brought his sacrifice. If a child desired admittance into the Church of God, it must be either by circumcision or by baptism j if he would renew in his youth the promises which had been made for him in his child- hood, he feasted on the sacrifice of the paschal lamb, or on the body and blood of Christ, in the feast of the Christian sacrament. The means of grace are atteuded with the influences of the Spi- rit of God, and he who obeys the will of God, always partakes of the blessing. The passage of Scripture which is contained in this section, is the first account in the Christian covenant ofa new means of grace, which was sanctioned by an evident impartation of the divine influences. Peter and John went down to Samaria to impart to the new proselytes the gifts of the Holy Spirit. The Evangelists who converted them, not having authority to per- form the higher functions of the apostolic order. The same Almighty Being who instituted the outward means of grace, withheld the gifts of his Holy Spirit till they could be communi- cated by his chosen servants in his own appointed way. Ifwc are required to deducr moral inferences from other pas- sages of Scripture; if the conduct of God to his ancient Church PETER REPROVES SIMON MAGUS— CHAP. IX. 75 the apostles' hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered Samaria. them money. 19 Saying, Give me also this power, that on whom- soever I lay hands, he may receive the Holy Ghost. 20 But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money. 21 Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter : for thy heart is not right in the sight of God. be still justly made a source of encouragement, and a motive to perseverance to Christians at present, on what grounds are we to reject the inferences that naturally arise from such facts as those now before us. Are we not right in concluding that this action was intended not only for the peculiar benefit of the Sa- maritan converts, but for an example, to all the Christian Churches, from that age to the present. The enactments of Christianity are to be found in the conduct of Christ and his apostles ; their practice is the best model for the right govern- ment of the Churches. From this conduct of the apostles the ancient primitive Church has uniformly required, that those who are admitted as ijifants into the Christian Church by baptism, should in maturer years be confirmed in their Christian profession by prayer and imposition of hands. Though the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit were conferred only by extraordinary men, appointed for that especial purpose, it was believed that his ordinary gifts might be imparted by the authorized ministers who were set apart for the service of the sanctuary. As the miraculous gifts were requisite at the first formation of the Christian Church, so now, when the Christian religion is fully established, its ordi- nary influences are equally necessary to enable man to recover the lost image of God, of which he had been deprived by the fall. It is but too usual with a large class of religionists to undervalue the external rites of Christianity : but it is our duty to examine whether any, and what rites were observed by the apostles, and to follow their authority ; rather than to inquire into the reasonableness or propriety of the apostolic institu- tions. The Roman Church has erred by adding to the enact- ments of Scripture ; the opposite extreme is to be no less avoid- ed, of depreciating or neglecting its commands. That Church is most pure whose discipline approaches the nearest to that which was practised by its divinely appointed founders, and is recorded for our example in the New Testament. I conclude this subject by availing myself of the high autho- rity of the pious and eloquent Bishop Home, who observes, speaking of Mr. Law, (vol. i. p. 214.) that although " the government and discipline of the Church will not save a man, yet it is absolutely necessary to preserve those doctrines that will. A hedge round a vineyard is in itself a poor paltry thing, but break it down, and all they that go by will pluck off her grapes. And no sin has been punished with heavier punish- ments for that reason, than throwing down fences, and making it indifferent whether a Christian be of any Church or none, so he be but a Christian, and have the birth of the inspoken word. But if Christ left a Church upon earth, and ordered submission to the appointed governors of it, so far as a man resists, or un- dervalues this ordinance of Christ, so far ho acts not like a Christian, let his inward lii^hl be what it will." 76 CANDACE'S TREASURER CONVERTED-CIIAP. IX. Julian Pe- 22 Repent therefore of this thy wickedness ; and pray Samaria, riod, 4747. QqA [f perhaps the thought of thine heart may be for- VulgaiiEra, • ' i -^ 3-4. given thee. 23 For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity. 24 Then answered Simon, and said, Pray ye to the Lord for me, that none of these things which ye have spoken come upon me. SECTION XXVIII. St, Peter and St. John preach in many Villages of the Samaritans. ACTS viii. 25. 25 And they, when they had testified and preached the word of the Lord, returned to Jerusalem, and preached the gospel in many villages of the Samaritans. SECTION XXIX. The Treasurer of Queen Candace, a Proselyte of righte- ousnessj is converted and baptized by Philip ^ who now preaches through the Cities cf Judea. ACTS viii. 26. to the end. 26 And the angel of the Lord spake unto Philip, say- Gaza. • ing, Arise, and go toward the south, unto the way that goeth down from Jerusalem unto Gaza, which is desert ^^ 27 And he arose and went : and, behold, a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians ^^^ who had the charge of all her ^^ The expression " which is desert," in the opinion of Glas- sius(a) and Schoetgen (6), refers to the way and not to Gaza itself. Kuinoel (c) approves of the opinion of Heinrich and Wassenburgh, that the clause was not found in the original text, but was subsequently introduced. (a) Glassius— Gramniat. Sac. Tract 2, de Pronomine, p. 514, of his collected works, and 190 of the separate work — iiri Tfjv bdov Ttjv KUTataivovaav arch 'lepovffoXrifi sig TdZ,av, a'vrt] £). During this YOL. II. G gg THE PAULINE PERSECUTION. Julian Pe- calamity, the members of tbe Christian Church stood in need of The Pro- riod 4746* all the support, consolation, and assistance, that could be ad- vince of Ju- VulgaryEra, ministered to them. But what comfort could they possibly dea, &c. 34. receive, in their distressed situation, comparable to that which resulted from the example of their suffering Master, and the promise he had made to his faithful followers ? This example, and those promises, St. Matthew seasonably laid before them, towards the close of this season of trial, for their imitation and encouragement, and delivered it to them, as the anchor of their hope, to keep them stedfast in this violent tempest. From this consideration Dr. Owen was led to fix the date of St. Matthew's Gospel to the year 38. St. Matthew ascribes those titles of sanctity to Jerusalem, by which it had been distinguished by the prophets and an- cient historians, (Comp. Neh. xi. 1. 18. Isa. xlviii. 2. hi. 1. Dan. ix. 24. with Matt. iv. 5. v. 35. xxvii. 52, 53.) and also testifies a higher veneration for the temple than the other Evangelists. (Comp. Matt. xxi. 12. with Mark xi. 15. Luke xix. 45. and Matt. xxvi. 51. with Markxiv. 58.) His compa- rative gentleness in mentioning John the Baptist's reproof of Herod, and his silence concerning the insults offered by Herod . to our Lord on the morning of his crucifixon, are additional evidences for the early date of his Gospel: for, as Herod was still reigning in Galilee, the Evangelist displayed no more ot that sovereign's bad character, than was absolutely necessary, lest he should excite Herod's jealousy of his believing subjects, or their disaffection to him. If he was influenced by these mo- tives, he must have written before the year 39, for in that year Herod was deposed and banished to Lyons by Caligula. Lastly, to omit circumstances of minor importance, Matthew's frequent mention (not fewer than nine times) of Pilate, as being then actually governor of Judea, is an additional evidence of the early date of his Gospel. For Josephus(c) informs us, that Pilate having been ordered by Yitellius, governor of Syria, to go to Rome, to answer a complaint of the Samaritans before the emperor, hastened thither, but before he arrived the em- peror was dead. Now, as Tiberius died in the spring of 37, it IS highly probable that St. Matthew's Gospel was written by that time (ro-Chaldaic dialect then spoken by the Jews! On the other hand, Erasmus, Paraeus, Calvin, Le Clerc, Fa- bricius, Pfeifler, Dr. Lightfoot, Beausobre, Basnage, Wetstein, Rumpaeus, Whitby, Edelman, Hoffman, Moldenhawer, Viser Harles, Jones, Drs. Jortin, Lardner, Hey, and Hales, Mr! Hewlett, and others, have strenuously vindicated the Greek original of St. Matthew's Gospel. A third opinion has been * ofiered by Dr. Townson, and some few modern divines, that there were two origaals, one in Hebrew and the other in Greek. G 2 g^ THE PAULINE PERSECUTION. "^Kresump^tn, however, is unquestionably in fa..ur of the opinion that St. Matthew wrote in Greek; for Greek was the nrevailin? lan-ua^ in the time of our Saviour and his apo.- lles Matthew^^^^^ ^ <^«"e«t«^ of customs, and before he was called be an apostle, would have frequent occa- s^ns both to write and to speak Greek, and could not d.seh^^^^^^ his office without understanding that language. Wernaj there fore consider it as highly probable, or even certain, that de understood Greek. Besides, as all the other evangelists and anS wrote their Gospels and Epistles in that language for ?he use Tch ist^^^^^^ (whether Jews or Gentiles) throughout Ihe known world ; and as St. Matthew's Gospel, though in the first instance written for the use of Jewish and Samaritan con- vert "was ultimately designed for universal dissemina jon t i s not likely that it was written in any other language than that which was employed by all the other writers of the New Testa- ment This preJumption is corroborated by the numerous and Remarkable in^stances of verbal agreement between Matthew and the other Evangelists ; which, on the supposition that he wrote in Hebrew, or the vernacular Syro-Chaldaic dialect, would not be cred' We. Even those who maintain that opinion are obliged to confess that an early Greek translation of this Gospe was in existence before Mark and Luke composed their s, ^hie^ they saw and consulted. The main point in dispute is, whether the prlsent Greek copy is entitled to the authority of an original or Sot : and as this i^s^a question of real and serious importance, we shall proceed to state the principal arguments on both sides. Tirmodern advocates'of the Hebrew Gospel above enume rated lav most stress upon the testimonies of Papids (Bishop of HieranXs a. d. 116;) of Irenaeus (a. d. 178), andofOr.gen (A.D230')fwhfch testimonies have been followed by Chrysos. tom! Jerome, and others of the early fathers of the Christian Church. But these £?ood men, as Wetstein has well observed, do not so properly bear testimony, as dehver their own conjec- tures, whfch we ire not bound to admit, unless they are sup- ported by good reasons. Supposing, and taking it lor granted that Matthew wrote for the Jews in Judea. they concluded that he wrote in Hebrew (fe): and because ^^e fathers formed this conclusion, modern writers, relying on their ^nthor ty have also inferred that Matthew composed his Gospel in that lan- puao-e. Let us now review their testimonies. ^ LPapTas, as cited by Eusebius, says (0, " Matthew com- posed the divine oracles in the Hebrew dialect, and each intei- pretedthem ashe wasable." ,., . , > „„„ « M«t 2. Irenaeus, as quoted by the same historian (m), says, Mat- thew published also a Scripture of the Gospel among the He- brews, in their own dialect." « Ac ThavP learned 3. 6rigen,as cited by Eusebius 7i), says, "As I ha^e learned ft/traditL concerning the four Gospels which alone are re- ceived without dispute by the whole Church of God under beaven.-The first was written by Matthew, once a Publican afterwards an apostle of Jesus Christ who published it for the believers from Judaism, coviposed in Hebrew tetters. In opposition to these testimonies, it is contended by the ad- vocates for the Greek original of the Gospel, 1. That the testimony of Papias, who was a weak and credu- lous man ( o), is vague and indecisive ; that he had not seen the ST. MATTHEW WRITES HIS GOSPEL— CHAP. IX. 35 Julian Pe- Hebrew Gospel itself; that it could not have been intended for J^^^Q p^^. riod, 4747. universal circulation by his own account, because every one vinceofJu- VulgariEra, was not able to interpret it; and that the Greek Gospel was dea, &c. 34. published before his time, as appears from the express or tacit references made by the apostolical fathers, who were all prior to Papias, and all of whom wrote in Greek. 2. The passage of Irenaeus above given, more critically trans- lated, may be understood to signify that, in addition to his Greek Gospel, Matthew published also a Hebrew Gospel, for the benefit of the Hebrews, or converts from Judaism, who used no other language but the vernacular dialect of Palestine. This, Dr. Hales thinks, was most probably the fact(p). This might be the original basis of the Gospel of the Nazarenes, the Gospel of the Ebionites, the Gospel according to the Hebrews, cited by Origen, Epiphanius, and Jerome, which in process of time became so adulterated by these Judaizing converts, as to lose all authority in the Church, and be deemed spurious. 3. The testimony of Origen per^fectly corresponds with this : for, surely, when he cited tradition for the existence of a He- brew Gospel, written by Matthew, for the converts from Ju- daism, he by no means denied, but rather presupposed his Greek Gospel, written for all classes of Christians, "composing the whole Church of God under heaven," for whose use the He- brew Gospel would be utterly inadequate. In fact, in his trea- tise on prayer, he intimates that the Evangelist published it in Greek also: for, discoursing on the word iTriovaiov, he con- siders it as formed by Matthew himself (qr). That Origen con- sidered the Greek as the only authentic original in his time, is evident, for the following reasons — 1. Origen, in his Hexapla, was accustomed to correct the GreeTi version of the Old Testa- ment by the Hebrew original ; but he virtually confesses that he had none by which he could correct the text of Matthew's Gospel (r) ; and, 2. He expressly cites (s) " a certain Gospel according to the Hebrews, if any one chooses to receive it, not as of authority^ but for illustration" of the question he was then discussing. Now, if this Hebrew Gospel had been the production of St. Matthew, he certainly would have cited it in a different manner. 4. In the Gospel of St. Matthew, as we now have it, there is certainly no appearance of its being a translation; but many considerations prove the contrary. For how can we account for the interpretation of Hebrew names, which, by an author writing in Hebrew, was by no means necessary, (compare Matt, i. 2.3. xxvii. 33. 46.) Again, why should the testimonies and parallel passages of the Old Testament be cited, not from the original Hebrew, but generally from the Septuagint version, even when that diifers from the Hebrew ? Lastly, how does it happen, that all the versions which are extant, such as the Latin, the Syriac, the Coptic, the Armenian, and the Ethiopic, are adapted, not to the Hebrew originul, but to the Greek translation ? These questions are all readily answered, if we admit that Matthew wrote his Gospel in Greek (f.) It only remains, that we brielly notice the tliird opinion above mentioned, viz. that there were two originals — one in Hebrew, the other in Greek, but both written by St. Matthew. This opinion, we believe, was first intimated by Dr. Whitby (x,) and is adopted by Dr. Hey, Dr. Townson, Bishop Glcig, and some other modern divines. The consent of antiquity pleads strongly for the Hebrev*', and evident marks of originality for the Greek. Bishop Gleig thinks, that St. Matthew, on his departure to preach the Gospel to the Gentiles, left with the 86 THE PAULINE PERSECUTION Julian Pe- Church at Jerusalem, or at least with some of its members, the The Pro- riod, 4747. Hebrew or Syriac memorandums of our Lord's doctrines and vince of Ju- Vulgar^ra, miracles, which he had made for his own use at the time when dea, &c. 34. the doctrines were taught, and the miracles performed ; and that the Greek Gospel was written long after the apostles had quitted Jerusalem, and dispersed themselves in the discharge of the duties of their office. This conjecture receives some coun- tenance from the terms in which Eusebius(y), when giving his own opinion, mentions St. Matthew's Gospel. " Matthew," says that historian, " having first preached to the Hebrews, delivered to them, when he was preparing to depart to other countries, his Gospel composed in their native language ; that to those, from whom he was sent away, he might by his writ- ings supply the loss of his presence (z.) This opinion is further corroborated by the fact, that there are instances on record, of authors who have themselves published the same work in two languages. Thus Josephus wrote the History of the Jewish War in Hebrew and Greek (aa). In like manner, we have two originals, one in Latin, the other in English, of the thirty-nine articles of the Anglican Church, and also of Sir Isaac Newton's Optics. As St. Matthew wanted neither ability nor disposition, we cannot think he wanted inducement to " do the work of an evangelist " for his brethren of the com- mon faith, Hellenists as well as Hebrews j to both of whom charity made him a debtor. The popular language of the first believers was Hebrew, or what is called so by the sacred and ancient ecclesiastical writers : but those who spoke Greek quickly became a considerable part of the Church of Christ. From a review of all the arguments adduced on this much litigated question, we cannot but prefer the last stated opinion as that which best harmonizes with the consent of antiquity, namely, that St. Matthew wrote first a Hebrew Gospel for the use of the first Hebrew converts. Its subsequent disappearance is easily accounted for, by its being so corrupted by the Ebio- nites that it lost all its authority in the Church, and was deemed spurious, and also by the prevalence of the Greek language, especially after the destruction of Jerusalem, when the Jewish language, and every thing belonging to the Jews fell into the utmost contempt. It also is clear that our present Greek Gos- pel is an authentic original, and consequently an inspired pro- duction of the Evangelist Matthew, written (not as Bishop Gleig and other writers suppose, long after our Lord's resurrec, lion and ascension,) but ^\jthin a few years after those me- morable and important events {bh). This view of the probability that the Gospel of St. Matthew was written in both languages, a|)pears to me, to be most cor- rect. I have given from Mr. Home, the arguments on both sides. The authorities which he and Dr. Lardncr have col- lected, to prove that the Gospel of St. Matthew was composed in Hebrew ; or that there were some documents called the Gospel of St. Matthew, compiled in that language, are so numerous, and so decisive, that I think we are hardly war- ranted in rejecting these testimonies; and there are again, on the other hand, such evident marks of originality in the present Greek Gospel of St. Matthew, that wo are not justified in esteeming it, with Michaelis, a mere translation. It is possible that the real state of the case might be this. When the perse- cution began, or was beginning, St. Matthew, who perhaps might have already committed to writing the memorable events of Christ's history, might have distributed among his own eountrymcn, the converts of Jerusalem, an account of the ST. MATTHEW WRITES HIS GOSPEL-CHAP. IX. 87 J.^lj^" P^" transactions and leaching of our Lord j but as the persecution The pro- V 1 ' i^' ^^^ °"* confined to Judea, but extended to Gentile cities, the ^ince of Ju- v^aigari*.ra, converts who had taken refuge in them would be naturally <^^^' ^<=' anxious to have the Gospel in that language which was most generally understood, that the glorious works of redemption and salvation might be made known unto them, as well as unto us. It is probable, therefore, that the Hebrew Gospel was first used, while the converts remained in Judea, or at least during the continuance of the Pauline persecution ; and that it might have been given about six years after the ascension, when the persecution was beginning; in the year 34 or 35, the date which is here assigned to*t. The Greek Gospel might have been given about two or three years later, when the converts returned to Jerusalem, and required inspired histories of our Lord to be sent to their brethren to those cities in which their safety had been secured. This hypothesis will reconcile some few of the discrepancies which have embarrassed many inquirers in their research into the early history of the Church. It accounts for the early dis- use, and non-appearance of the Hebrew Gospel — it agrees with the early date assigned by Dr. Townson, Bishop Tomline, and Dr. Owen, who refer the writing of Sts Matthew's Gospel to the year 37, or 38, it corresponds with the internal testimony in favour of a very early date, and is supported by the rea- soning of Bishop Tomline and Dr. Owen. (a)EIem. of Christ. Theol. vol. i. p. 391. (b) See this proved at lengfth in Dr. Owen's Observations on the Four Gospels, pp.1.21. 8vo. 1T64. (c) Ant. Jud. lib. xviii. c. iv. sect. 2. (rf) Dr. Townson's Discourses on the Gospels, Works, vol. i. pp. 107—115. (e) Works, 8vo. vol. vi. pp. 57, 58 ; 4to. vol. iii. pp. 163, 164. (/) Key to the New Test. p. 55. 3d edit, (g) Thus Zacharias, the father of the Baptist, speaks of Christ as coming " to give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death," (Luke i. 79.) wliich description includes the Gentiles ; and Simeon expressly calls him " a light to lighten the Gentiles, (Luke ii. 32.) (h) Bishop Tomline's Elements of Christ. Theol. vol. i. p. 302. (i) Dr. Townson's Discourses, disc. iv. sect. 4. Works, vol. i. pp. 116, 117. (k) Wetstenii Nov. Test. torn. i. p. 224, note, (l) MarOaXog jxev ovv e€paidi diaXtKTU) to. \6yia cvveypd'ipaTO. ijpfitvtvrrt d'avTa iig i^divaro eKa'^og. Eusebii. Hist. Eccl. lib. 3. c.39. torn. i. p. 138. edit. Reading, (wi) o fxkv de Mar- Baiog iv ToXg 'i^paioig, iv rrj tdig, avrdv haXiKTu)^ Kai ypa^ijv i|- TjvsyKfv tvayykXiov. Ibid. lib. v. c.8. torn. i. p. 219. (») Ibid. lib. vi. c. 25. torn. i. p. 290. (o) See Jortin's Remarks on Eccl. Hist. vol. i! pp. 309, 310. 2d edit, (p) This conjecture. Dr. Hales remarks, derives additional weight from the incorrect reports of Eutychius and Theo- phylact, that Matthew wrote his Hebrew Gospel at Jerusalem, which John the Evangelist translated into Greek. Analysis of Chronology, vol. ii. book ii. p. 665. (q) Origen de Oratione, c. 161. p. 150. edit. Reading, (r) See his Works, Op. torn. iii. p. 671. edit. De la Rue, or in Bishop Marsh's Michaelis, vol. iii. part ii. pp.114, 115, where they are cited and explained. («) Dr. Lardner has given the passage at length, Works, 8vo. vol. ii. p. 505 ; 4to. vol. i. p. 553. (t) Mr, Hewlet's note on Matt. i. 1. Dr. Hales's Analysis, vol. ii. pp. 664— 667. Lardner's Supp. to Credibility, chap. 5. (Works, 8vo. vol. vi. pp. 45—65 ; 4to. vol. ii. pp. 157—107.) Pritii, Introd. ad Nov. Test. pp. 298—311. Moldenhawer, Introd. ad Libros Canonicos, pp. 247 254. Michaehs, vol. ii. pp. 112 — 201. Rumpici, Comm. Crit. in Nov. Test. pp. 81—84. Viser, Herm. Sacr. Nov. Test, pars ii. pp. 344—352. Dr. Campbell's Preface to Matthew, vol. ii. pp. 1 — 20. (.r) Preface to St. Matthew's Gospel, vol. i. p. I. (y) Eusebius, Eccl. Hist. lib. iii. c. 4. (z) Lib. i. pref. sect. 1, 2. (a«) Dr. Hey's Norrisian Lectures, vol. i. pp. 28, 29. Bishop Gleig's edit, of Stackhouse, vol. iii. p. 112. Dr. Townson's Works, vol. i. pp. 30— 32. (66)Hornc, Crit. Introd. vol. ii. pp. 238—243. 88 SAUL IS CONVERTED— CHAP. IX. j.ilianPe- SECTION XXXI. Near Da- riod, 4748. Saul, on his way to Damascus^ is converted to the Religion ™ascas. 35^ ^* ' he was ojiposing on hearing the Bath Col, and seeing the Shechinah ^^. ACTS ix. 1 — 9. 1 And Saul, yet breathing out threatenings and slaugh- ter*® agamst the disciples of the Lord, went unto the high- priest. And desired of him letters ^^ tc^Damascus to the syna- 5" St. Luke not having specified the time of St. Paul's conver- sion and the apostle himself not having done it in his epistles, the opinions upon it vary much. Some place his conversion in the year of the crucifixon, or at the beginning of the following year ; others seven or eight years after, in the second year of Claudius. I have preferred the opinion which steers between these two extremes, and place the conversion of St. Paul at the . year 35, about the time that war was declared between Herod the Tetrarch of Galilee, and Aretas King of the Arabs (a). This epoch does not seem attended with any difiBculty. It agrees very well with " the fourteen years" that the apostle reckons between his conversion and the third voyage that he afterwards made to Jerusalem. It furnishes moreover some very natural reasons, why being at Damascus he was immediately in safety there, and why he afterwards retired into Arabia, rather than into any other place, and why upon his return from Arabia he no longer found protection at Damascus, and is the dale which is generally adopted. Herod and Aretas quarrelled, for the reasons mentioned by Josephus, Antiq.lib. 18. cap. 7. and they came to an open war in the year 36. Herod's army was defeated. The Romans took his part ; but the death of Tiberius, which happened in the month of March, in the year 37, stopped the Romans, who were marching against the Arabs. Vitellius, who was commander of the Roman army, had the news of his death at Jerusalem, during the feast of the passover. (a) Spanheim. De conv. Paul. p. 197. Pearson, Lardner, Hales, Home, &c. &c. 58 E/xTTj/swv airtiKriQ Kai (p9r}V (Toi — Witsii Meletera. Leidens. de Vit. Pauli, p. 17.— Macknight on the Epistles, vol. vi. p. 416.— Kuinoel m lib. Hist. N. T. vol. iv. p. 323.— Doddridge's Family Expositor.— Dr. A. Clarke, and Whitby m loc. 62 The expression here used is supposed by some to be pro- verbial, signifying the injury and hurt they are likely to receive who resist superior power, more especially as relating to God. To confirm this opinion, many classical authors are referred to. Euripides in Bacch. 5. 794. Columella de re rustica2.2. 26, &c. and Pindar Pyth, 2. 173. who asserts we must not contend against God, but bear the yoke he puts on our neck mildly, and not kick against the goads ; that is, remarks the Scholiast, not to fight against God, being only men. The great Bochart re- jects the idea that the expression is derived from any other au- 92 SAUL IS CONVERTED— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 6 And he, trembling and astonished, said. Lord, what Near Da- Vufgat^Era, ^^^^ ^^^^^ ^^^^ ^^ *^ ^^ • ^^^ ^^^ ^"^^^ ^^^^ ""^^ ^i'^' mascus. 35. ' Arise, and go into the city, and it shall be told thee what thou must do. 7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speech- less, hearing a voice, but seeing no man ". 8 And Saul arose from the earth ; and when his eyes were opened, he saw no man ^* : but they led him by the hand, and brought him into Damascus. tbority than that of Scripture itself. Moses uses it when he says Jeshurun waxed fat (et recalcitravit,) and kicked against the law, (Deut. xxxii. 15.) and also God himself, (1 Sam. ii. 29.) why kick ye against my sacrifices ? The clause is retained in the Vulgate, the Arabic, yEthiopic, and Armenian versions, al- though it is not inserted in others, or in the Greek Manuscripts. Griesbach likewise rejects it. 63 This verse bears the appearance of differing with the parallel passage, chap. xxii. 9. where it is said that the men that were with me heard not the voice. Dr. Hammond remarks, that the word (pwvri signifies thunder, and he would reconcile the two texts by reading " They that were with me heard the voice of the thunder, but heard not the voice of him that spake unto me." The word vri is often used in this sense in the Old Testament, (Exod. ix. 23. 27. 33, 34. xx. 18. Ps. xviii. 13, &c. &c.) In this verse the word seems to be used in the same sense as chap. ii. 2. (see the note in loc.) with reference to the thunder, which usually accompanied the Bath Col, or voice from heaven ; m chap. xxii. 9.' it more particularly relates to the voice itself, which the attendants of St. Paul, in consequence of their alarm and confHsion, did not hear, or if they did, without rightly un- derstanding it. Beza, Vatablus, and Clarius think that they heard Saul's voice, but not that of Christ. Dr. Benson, as ctKoveiv often sig- nifies to understand, supposes these attendants were Hellenist Jews, who did not understand the Hebrew, which was the lan- guage in which Christ addressed Paul. Dr. Whitby and Dr. Doddridge, that the voice from heaven was taken for thunder. — Doddridge, vol. ii. p. 3G. For further solutions of the difficulty, see Wolfius Curse Phil, vol. ii. p. 1138. Bishop Barrington, Dr. Weston,, and others, ap. Bowyer, and the commentators. The Jews say that God three times spoke to Moses, Aaron being by and not hearing the voice : in Egypt, Exod. vi. 28. Mount Sinai, Num. iii. 1. and in Levit. i. I. in The same mode of expression is used in Schemoth Rabba, sect. 11. fol. 104. 3. in Exod. ii. 2. « The angel of the Lord ap- peared to him." Why is it thus said so expressly rbti to him, because other men were with him, but none of these saw any thing but Moses only. So also in Dan. x. 7. 6^ He lost his sight from the glory of that light. Michaelis, in Richteri chirurgischer Bibliothek, b. vi. p. 732. ap. Kuinoel, relates, that an African struck with lightning lost his sight, but recovered it suddenly. In the Critici Sacri is a treatise on the blindness of St. Paul, considered in its origin, continuance, and cure. Jortin remarks, that the miracle by which St. Paul was in- structed and converted, has been thought bv some to be of the trablcmatic and prophetic kind, and to indicate the future call- SAUL IS CONVERTED— CHAP. IX. 93 Julian Pe- 9 And he was three days without sight, and neither did Near Da- riod,4748. eat nor drink ^\ mascus. Vulgar^ra, 35. ing of the Jews ; so that Paul the persecutor, and Paul the apostle, was a type of his own nation. St. Paul, though the apostle of the Gentiles, never cast off bis care for his own brethren, and always expressed himself on that subject with the warmest affection ; and he alone, of all the writers in the New Testament, hath spoken clearly of the resto- ration of the Jews: he earnestly wished for that happy day, and saw it afar off, and was glad. St. Paul was extremely zealous for the law, and a persecutor of the Christians— so" were the Jews. St. Paul, for opposing Jesus Christ, was struck blind; but upon his repentance he received his sight — so were the Jews, for their rebellion, smitten with spiritual blindness, which shall be removed when they are received again into favour. St. Paul was called miraculously, and by the glorious mani- festation of Christ himself, and was instructed by the same Di- vine Master: such will perhaps be the conversion and the illu- mination of the Jews. St. Paul was called the last of the apostles — the Jews will cer- tainly enter late into the Church. St. Paul was the most active, laborious, and successful of all the disciples : such perhaps the Jews also shall be after their conversion. But these are rather conjectures of what may be, than discoveries of what must come to pass (a). (a) See Jortin's Remarks on Ecclesiastical Histcry, works, vol. ii. p. 14. and Mede's works, book v. p. 891, 892. as well as book iv. epist. xvii. p. 768. Jortin does not mention Mede, who has considered the parallel at greater length. ^5 From the manner in which the conversion of St. Paul is related by St. Luke, many have been led to suppose that all those who are really Christians, must receive and retain some sensible impression of their conversion ; and consequently re- member the exact time or moment in which it took place. Others again argue, that St. Paul was selected from the rest of mankind as Abraham, Moses, the Prophets, and the Apostles, were for the especial purpose of promoting the designs of Pro- vidence in effecting the redemption of mankind ; and therefore that it affords no sanction for the expectation of any sudden or miraculous conversion for others. Both parties insist with equal earnestness and sincerity in enforcingthe doctrine of Scripture, that " without holiness no man shall see the Lord :" but one would look for conversion in some momentary operation of the Spirit of God, without any previous preparation in the heart or conduct of the individual; the other on the contrary would rather seek it in the study of the Scriptures, and in the due ob- servance of the progressive and appointed means of grace which are given to all, as necessary to salvation, and which are always attended with the influences of the Holy Spirit. The former, who believes that God more frequently impresses the mind by some sudden impulse, does not deny that it may sometimes happen, that individuals may be so educated and brought up, that they shall be sanctified from the womb. Thus the celebrated Annesly, the non-conformist divine, declared that he never remembered to have been converted. On the other side it is equally acknowledged, that it may please the same God who miraculously converted St. Paul, to impress in the most unexpected and peculiar manner the mind of any individual, at any time it may seem good to bis Providence to do so. He 94 SAUL IS BAPTIZED— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- cT?rT"Tn\r yyytt Damascus. riod,4748. SECTION XXXII. Vulgar^Era, a i • r> • ■, 35. '^iciul IS Baptized. ACTS ix. 10 — 19. 10 And there was a certain disciple at Damascus, would not, for instance, assert that it was impossible that Con- stantine beheld a cross, or that Colonel Gardiner heard a voice in the air, or any other circumstance of this nature (6) ; but his general belief is, that since the canon of Scripture has been completed, the sacraments are the effectual and divinely ordained means of grace by which the Holy Spirit is conveyed to man for his renovation j and that sufficient evidence is given to all men for their establishment in the faith, without any extraordinary or preternatural interference in their favour. Christianity, it must ever be remembered, is not a system of theoretical opinions, but a system of positive institutions. If so, we may expect miracles at the establishment, but not in the continuance of the dispensation. In one sense of the word every thing is a miracle, both in the natural and moral world. The growth of a plant is to us an unaccountable event ; but we see that it is gradually brought to perfection, by the sun and rain from heaven — these are the appointed laws of nature. In the same way the divine inlluences of the Holy Spirit, by the appointed means of grace, gradually operate on the heart, till it brings forth the fruits of perfection, and the perfect man is formed. It is certain that the great Creator of the flower or the herb might by a word command them to grow either on the waves of the sea, or the floor of a room, but as this would be deviating from established laws, we do not anticipate such an occurrence. In the same manner it is not generally to be expected that the Almighty Creator will depart from his own appointed means of salvation to eftect the recovery of sinful man, who refuses to be nourished by the common blessings from on high. It is not now to be expected that the heavens will again open, the Shechinah appear, the Bath Col be heard, or the holy flame kindle on holy heads ; these indisputable evi- dences of divine majesty are reserved for the consummation of all things. In the mean time, God the Creator and Saviour, who provides for the lilies and the flowers of the field, has in his mercy ordained provision for the soul as well as the body of man — " My flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink in- deed." Without the care and the labour of man the Ibod for the body would be lost in the ground ; without the use of the revealed means of grace, the fruits of the Holy Spirit would be looked for in vain. Break up therefore the fallow ground of your hearts (Hosea x. 12.) for it is time to seek the Lord, that the showers and the latter rain may not be withholden (Jer.iv. 3.) The real question to be decided then is, whether he is most right who expects the influences of the Spirit to be conveyed to him through the means of those solemn ordinances which God Himself has ordained, gradually accomplishing that change of heart, without which spiritual happiness cannot be attained ; or whether that opinion is to be preferred, which leads to the anticipation of some sudden impression producing the same eflect independent of a humble attendance on the means of grace, in obedience to the Divine will. I am convinced, that if Christians who believe in the doctrines SAUL IS BAPTIZED—CHAP. IX. 95 Julian Pe- named Ananias : and to him said the Lord in a vision, Damascus, riod, 4748. Ananias. And he said, Behold, I am herCt Lord. VulgariEra, . 35. of the Trinity, tlie Incarnation, tiie Atonement, and the absolute necessity of inward holiness, IVom the influences of the Divine Spirit, as well as outward morality, were to examine impartially some controverted logomachies, they would not so much difler. If certain systematic words were not so frequently resorted to, there would be much less misapprehension and bitterness. Let us place this subject in more general propositions, and we shall then perceive how slight is the difference which divides these contending parties. It will be acknowledged by all that a due regard at least is necessary to external religion for the sake of its author ; but that this very regard to the divine ordinances, if it does not pro- ceed from obedience and love in Him who ordained them, and faith in their spiritual effects and signification, becomes pre- sumption and hypocrisy. Man at his creation was made perfect ; the spiritual triumph- ing over the inferior nature. When he fell, the earthly or animal nature predominated. As his descendants we are made par- takers of the same earthly and animal nature-r-we are born with it — its existence constitutes our original sin — we are subject to its penalties, and rendered totally untit'for a spiritual immorta- lity hereafter. The system of revelation is the plan for restoring man to God, by renewing within him that spiritual nature which he lost by the fall of his first parent. The manner in which this important object is to be accom- plished, has ever been the same. It is faith in the atonement of one Redeemer, the manifested God of the Patriarchs, Jews, and Christians, producing holiness of life. The manner in which this faith is made effectual, has ever been the same. Outward means of grace were instituted from the moment of the expulsion from Paradise. Where these ex- ternal ordinances have been observed through faith, and in compliance with the revealed will of God, his influences have uniformly been imparted, and a spiritual change of heart im- perceptibly and gradually accomplished. The Spirit of God however is not confined to means. The Omnipotence of God is not limited to the measures he has him- self revealed or ordained. It is impossible therefore not to be- lieve that the death of a friend or relative, a lingering illness, or any other affliction or circumstance, may not, through divine grace, be made the instrument of salvation, and turn our hearts from this world to serve the living God. But few will hesitate to join with me in the conclusion, that the divine blessing is to be more generally found in those significant and solemn institu- tions, which The Way— The Truth— and The Life Himself ap- pointed. This is not the place to enter further into this controversy. The ancient fathers, the reformers in general, and the Church o*" England at present, make the commencement of our accept- ance with God (by whatever name, conversion or regeneration, ■we may call it,) to begin with baptism ; and that the influences of the Holy Spirit continue with the Christian through life, to complete the work of justification, to renovate him when he falls, to preserve him in temptation, and to support him in death, unless those influences are quenched by wilful, repeat- ed, deliberate, and persevering sin. This system, which makes our Christian life begin with certain feelings in maturer years, 9(5 SAUL IS BAPTIZED— CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 11 And the Lord said unto him, Arise, and go into the Damascus. riod, 4748. street which is called Straight, and inquire in the house VulgaryEra, ~ 35. ~~ " makes the question concerning baptism so very important. The re-estabhshment of the ancient union among believers, depends on our estimate of the benetits attendant on that tirst and most solemnly commanded ordinance — whether it is merely an useful rite, or an appointed means of grace j — or, as it is defined in the Church Catechism, an outward sign of an inward grace. The system which refuses to confine the beginning of our Christian life to baptism, is thus described by a once distinguished writer — Regeneration has its degrees. Its first step is contrition, and that softening of the heart by which a man is brought to a sense of sin and misery ; and under the influence of which he ear- nestly desires deUverance. The second is a knowledge of Christ, by which whoever is convinced of the sufficiency of Christ to deliver him, denies himself, and flies to Christ, and by a living faith is united to him, and with a filial confidence of deliverance depends upon him, and a filial love towards God * is kindled in his heart, bj the power of which he serves God with unfeigned obedience, and a holy life. The first step is called the spirit of bondage, and it is properly the effect of law; the second is the spirit of adoption, and it is the proper eti'ect of the Gospel (a). The learned writer then pro- ceeds to illustrate this hypothesis by the instance of Cornelius. I think it is evident, that the Scriptures of truth no where command us to have this train of feelings, to become accept- able to God, Faith and obedience, — or faith, obedience, and repentance, are required : and it is impossible, in general, for the Christian who has been baptized, and has received a reli- gious education, and knows God from his infancy, to say when he begins to have faith, and to have become acceptable to his Maker, Few men can pass through life without many feelings of sorrow for sin, of humility before God, of desire to become more holy. No human being can declare himself spotless be- fore his Creator. But all these emotions are the result of our knowledge of God, and his Son, which are given us by the means of grace ; and they proceed from the Holy Spirit which attends them. They are common to all men, at all ages; they are experienced by children at the first dawn of reason, and by the aged at the close of life. Since the Scripture and the means of grace have been given, I believe that all pretensions of this nature are very dubious ; though I dare not say, that the Father of the spirits of men may not visibly communicate his will to some favoured individuals, when he pleases. 1 believe only, that he has not done so ; because the law of Christ is sufficient to guide any of his creatures to future happiness. Dr. Doddridge relates the anecdote of Colonel Gardiner, as if the circumstance might possibly have been the vivid sug- gestion of his own mind. The hour was midnight — he was ' confused with intemperance — the cause of his watchfulness was criminal — he had received a religious education, and the silence, and solitude, and the possible reproaches of his con- science led him to some associations of ideas respecting Ihe crucified Saviour, whom he had forgotten. At such a moment he saw, or thought he saw, the cross in the air, and heard the appeal of the imagined figure before him. This appears to me to be the natural result of those laws of mind which God has given to every man. These natural reflections SAUL IS BAPTIZED— CHAP. IX. 97 Julian Pe- of Judas for 07ie called Saul of Tarsus : for, behold, he Damascus. 35. were made the means of grace : for the impression was never erased from his mind. The Spirit of God " prevented him, and put into his mind good desires;" and the consistency of his subsequent life, proved that He who giveth grace to man, was present at the hour of temptation. But it would be the most intolerable presumption, that any man should delay re- pentance, till his mind was affected in a similar manner. With respect to the cross of Constantine, I subjoin the cri- ticism of Jortin; and I am inclined to agree with this eminent divine, that there was possibly no miracle in this case also; though the result of the victory was most important, as it de- cided whether Christianity should become the religion of the Roman empire. A. D. 811, Constantine being disposed to pro- tect and embrace Christianity, which his father had greatly fa- voured, and about to fight Maxentius, prayed to God for his assistance. As he was marching, he saw in the afternoon, in the sky, over the sun, a shining cross, with this inscription (tovtoj v'lKo) joined to it. The sight astonished him, and the army which accompanied him. This he related to Eusebius with his own mouth, and sware to the truth of it at a time when many of the soldiers were living. Afx^l ixtcrtjiitpivaQ r]\iov oipag ySt] TTJg rifiepag c'nroKXLvovcrrjQ, avroig 6^9a\fiolg ideXv i. or ypa^/i«ra, nor men- tioning in what language it was written, seens to speak rather of an emblem or picture, than of a writing. Add to this, that in the standard which Constantine ordered to be made in the form of a cross, in memory of this omen, he placed a crown of gold and jewels on the top of it, and a cypher denoting the name of Christ, but not the words tovtu) v'lKa. Euseb, Vit. Const. I. 31. Amongst the Panegyrici Vetercs, the eighth is in VOL. II. H r 98 SAUL IS BAPTIZED-CHAP. IX. Julian Pe- 12 And hath seen in a vision a man named Ananias Damascns. Vukar^ra ^^^^^^S "i> ^^^^ putting his hand on him, that he might 35. ' receive his sight. 13 Then Ananias answered, Lord, I have heard by many of this man, how much evil he hath done to thy saints at Jerusalem : 14 And here he hath authority from the chief priests to bind all that call on thy name. 15 But the Lord said unto him. Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel ^^ unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel : 16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my name's sake. 17 And Ananias went his way, and entered into the house ; and putting his hands on him, said. Brother Saul, the Lord, even Jesus, that appeared unto thee in the way praise of Constantine, and celebrates his victory over Maxen- tius, but says not a word of the cross. The author of this pane- gyric was a Pagan. The ninth also, composed by Mazarius, is silent concerning this prodigy. One of the panegyrists speaks ofa last omen, by which he might mean the cross. See Tille- mont, H. des Empires, 4. 632. Not. But, after all, it seems rather more natural to interpret yga I shall here take the opportunity of observing to the Jew who may disbelieve that Jesus of Nazareth Avas the true and ex- pected Messiah, that the declarations of the New Testament are not only supported by miracles of the same, or ofgreater extent and wonder, than those of Moses (which I have attempted to shew in a former note,) but that every testimony which demon- strated the truth of the Mosaic dispensation, was vouchsafed in support of the Christian revelation also. — If miraculous gifts were imparted to the Sanhedrim, on its first establishment, (Num. xi. 25.) they were likewise granted at the early meeting of the infant Church of Christ, as a pledge of the presence of his Holy Spirit.— Were extasies and visions permitted to the prophets of the olden Church, so likewise were they in the apos- tolic age. St. Paul had his vision in the temple ; and again the Lord appeared to him, and comforted him. (Acts xxiii. 11.) To St. Peter a sheet descended from heaven, for the purpose of unfolding to him the great truth that the Gentiles also were to be made partakers of the Gospel-blessings. — If a super-human knowledge of God, and of the invisible world, be an internal proof of the inspiration of the writers of the Old Testament, which of these can bear any comparison with the discoveries of the unseen state revealed in the transfiguration, when the spi- rits of men were seen as they will appear in glory at the last great day — or in the resurrection of our Lord, w hen the same body assumed new and mysterious properties — when angi'js were its guardians, and the spirits of the dead arose .? Havoany of the inspired anticipations of the old prophets exceeded those of St. Paul, who was exalted to a state where he heard things which it was not lawful for man to utter ? or have tijey equalled the more glowing and sublime representations of the Apocalypse, when the beloved disciple, wrapt in the highest visions, de- scribes the perfection of the spiritual temple, and the removal of the curse from mankind? — Did the Urim and Thummim mys- teriously communicate the will of God to the suppliant priest ? Christ himself has spoken to us in the fulness of the Godhead bodily, and has committed to us the lively oracles. — Was the voice from the mercy-seat heard by the privileged lawgiver of Israel ? Did it whisper in Eden, or speak in thunder at Sinai ? Was it heard by Elishain the wilderness, or by Daniel in Baby- lon ? so also did it thrill into the ears of the priests and the peo- ple in the temple, carrying conviction to the inquiring Gre'cks. It proclaimed, at the baptism of Christ, from the mercy-seat of heaven, " This is mj beloved Son." It arrested the j)ersecut- ing Paul, breathing out vengeance and slaughter. — Were the angels of heaven the visitors of Abraham at his tent, or of Jacob at Mahanaim ? so were they also the glorious ambassadors from heaven, announcing the advent of the Prince of Peace, the pro- raised Messiah.— Was the prophet the discerner of spirits, when he inquired of his servant, " Went not mine heart with thee, when the man turned again from his chariot to meet thee ?" so likewise did Peter penetrate into the deepest recesses of that covetous heart, which he declared to be in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity. — Was Gehazi struck with leprosy? feo also was Elynias with blindness, and Ananias with instant death. THE CHURCHES ARE AT REST-CHAP. IX. 103 Julian Pe- 42 And it was known throughout all Joppa ; and Palestine. Z^^i^I^^ many believed in the Lord. VulgariEra, 43 And it Came to pass, that he tarried many days in 38 to 40. Joppa, with one Simon a tanner ''. SECTION XXXV. The Churches are at rest ''^from Persecut'ioriy in consequence of the Conversion of Saul y and the conduct of Caligula. — Did Moses foretel the eventual dispersion of Israel nearly two thousand years before it took place ? so also do the apostles of the New Testament unanimously predict their future union and re- establishment in the Holy Land. — Did the prophet Elisha raise to life the son of the widowed friend of his poverty and persecu- tion ? so also did the apostle St. Peter bid Tabitha arise; and restored from the dead the benefactor of the poor and destitute. — These facts rest on the same species of evidence, and were given for the confirmation of one common dispensation of divine truth, to demonstrate the beautiful harmony that pervades the two covenants; and to convince both Jew and Gentile that the God of both their religions is the same God, neither ought his children to be any longer divided. If the mission ofChrist was not confirmed by such stupendous judgments as those which Moses inflicted, when the earth open- ed and swallowed up Dathan and his coadjutors and all their company, and they went down alive, and the people fled at the cryof them ; or by such judgments as caused that equally fearful exclamation, " If 1 be a man of God, let fire come down from heaven to consume thee," and the fire descended — it must be remembered, that the new dispensation was one of mercy — that our Saviour came to seek and to save those that were lost — and that his whole object was to remove the curse of sin, and all its attendant afflictions, diseases, and miseries. His apostles in- flicted death on two individuals only, for the unpardonable crime of sin against the Holy Ghost ; they demonstrated their power in a manner more consistent with the dispensation they were commissioned to establish, by relieving the infirmities and sick- nesses of men, and redeeming them from him who had the power of death, that is, the devil. 7' The trade of a tanner was esteemed by the Jews so con- temptible, that all those who followed it were required to mention the same before their marriage, under the penalty of the nuptials becoming void. It is recorded in the Mischna, that after the death of a man whose brother exercised the trade of a tanner, the wise men of Sidon decided, that the widow of the deceased was permitted to decline intermarrying with that brother. This custom explains to us the probable reason why the Evangelist might have been so particular, in relating so appa- rently a trivial circumstance, as the lodgings of the apostle. St. Peter took up his abode with the most mean and despised of his own countrymen, although at this time without divine interpo- sition, he would have refused to preach to Cornelius, an honour- able Gentile.— See Schoetgen, vol. i. p. 447. See various ordinances among the Jews, ap. Wetstein in loc. expressive of contempt for the occupation of a tanner. '2 Dr. Lardner, contrary to the decision of the generality of commentators, has endeavoured to shew that the rest or peace 104 FAITH AND GOVERxVMENT OF Julian Pe- .„„ • n-i riod,4753. ACTSIX. Jl. j^^^^^^ VulgarvEra, 31 Then had the churches rest " throughout all Judea or prosperity which the Church now enioved was not in h^ attributed to the conversion of St. Paul, tu^i to the effects pro! duced among the Jews by the command of Caligula wh.ch directed the statue to be placed in the temple of Jerusairm See Lardners Credibility, vol.i.p. 97-loi! and Hales' Ch;;! nology, vol. 11. part ii. p. 1191. t-nro- nfri5^*r^"''TKP'?-''^^^\^ through the history of the Church of Christ during the time that it consisted only of Jewish con- nnh!:«JlM i^\'''' "''''^ ^^^ ^PP^^' «^ t'^^ '"'^'•^if"' Saviour nffhpT'ivS '^'^T".P.'^^^^^^ t''^ wonderful operations ot the Holy Spirit. But the veil was still upon their eyes and although the Jewish converts may be considered as th; first fruits of the Christian Church, /et the Sanhedrim thn ea ers ofthe people, and by far the 'greater part of tlie na'tion' S.1 persisted in their blind rejection of Him, - to whom gave all the prophets witness." ° ^ At this period the infant Church presented to the world wher- ever they were scattered, whether in Jerusalem orTn the pro vinces, the interesting spectacle of unbroken - unity and oK love." There were no controversies, no heartburn"ni no mutual jealousies to disturb that holy calm, the fru"t of rit'hte ousness; they obeyed to the utmost that new commandment gu'^n to them. " Love one another." When any occ^sTon oS satisfaction occurred, such for instance as the complaint" ofthe Grecians on account of their widows, the wound wa mmedi! ately healed, and the commands of their appointed heT re spected and obeyed. They were one fold, u^nTr ce shepherd They continued stedfast in the Apostles doctrine and fellow.* ship, in freque-^t celebration of the communion, in thanksaivil and prayers They were united in doctrine, practice and d?s^ ^^l^H^::^ ^"^ ^"^^ preservativ'es^of rea, 'unTt^ ^nd was the divine personage, the manifested God if the Patriarchs the true Messiah, Acts ii. 36.-They believed in thrnecessilv of repentance for the crucifixion of the Prince of Liiraud df conversion from Judaism to Christianity, as well as f^om sin to holiness. Acts iii. 38.-the resurrection of Christ, Acts H 3 -the elevalion of Christ till the time of the reslitition of a I Acts 111. ^2.— the (eventual) overthrow of the Jewish disucnsa tion, Acs v. 14. and as we find also from the speech of St S?" phen-the doctrine ofthe atonement of Christ, Acts vii 3^35 and salva ,on to man by Christ alone ; for there is no otherl^me given under heaven, whereby we can be saved. That they bT l.eved ,n the necessity of personal holiness, and ofthe influences SoirU S.^TV ll '"*^^"^ ^■''^'" *'^^ manifestations of t^ Spirit under Avhich they so immediately lived, and which on every fit occasion they so gladly bestowed. (See Ac?s iii 26^ ^elaTeV?n'th.^V''''^r "J! ^hfir faith, established on the fact related m the Gospels, of whose truth they must have been iorUvTrf'"";"^" **^'*'r "y ^^ eye-witnessJs. The great m a- •i?lH .^,? Clir.st.ans m all countries, however they may have the fond ''^" simplicity of the Christian Creed, believe in these! 1/reZ , rTh'' r^ ««f"tial doctrines of their faith. But thi aLnrr,;; r '• ?''^^'^ ^° have been a sacred bond of union among Chnstuuis, has not protected Ihem from those variou" THE CHURCH AT JERUSALEM— CHAP. IX. 105 and Galilee and Samaria, and were edified ; and walking Ljdda. divisions and controversies which make the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme. The twelve articles of the Apostles Creed may be collected from the teaching of St. Peter in the first chapters of the book oftheActs. (See Bishop Pearson's divisions.) I. I believe in God the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven and earth, Acts iv. 24. II. And in Jesus Christ, his only Son our Lord, Acts ii. 38. III. Which was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary, Acts i. 14. IV. Suffered under Pontius Pilate, was crucified, dead, and buried. Acts iii. 13. iv. 27. V. He descended into hell : the third day he arose again from the dead. Acts ii. 27. 31. iii. 15. iv. 33. VI. He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God, the Father Almighty, Acts iii. 13. 21. v. 31. VII. From thence he shall come to judge the quick and the dead. Acts iii. 21. VIII. I believe in the Holy Ghost, Acts ii.38. v. 32. IX. The holv Catholic Church, the communion of saints, Actsi. 8. ii. 39^ iii. 26. X. The forgiveness of sins, Acts ii. 38. v. 31. XI. The resurrection of the body— (this is implied in the re- surrection of Christ, see Art. V.) XII. And the life everlasting. This is implied in the belief in the ascension— see Art. VI. II. The practice or religious conduct of the Church of Jeru- salem, was consonant with their knowledge. Personal religion was the criterion of their faith. They were in frequent com- munion.—Their prayers were many — their adherence to the doctrines of the apostles was stedfast — their boundless libera- lity was founded upon its most acceptable source, self-denial, and the sacrifice of the things of the flesh— their motive was the will of God. Peace, and joy in God, love to each other, personal holiness, and consequent happiness, characterized this holy communion, and Paradise seemed again restored to this favoured portion of mankind. Since this golden age, has no Christian Church been so perfect or so prosperous. Never, it is to be feared, will the same felicity be revived, till that Mil- lennial period, which the wise and good have always antici- pated, in that petition, " Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth, as it is in heaven;" when the curse of sin shall be re- moved from the earth, and the nations shall become the inhe- ritance of the anointed of God; and the uttermost parts of the earth shall be his possession (a). III. The union and happiness which were so eminently en- joyed by the Church of Jerusalem, under the government of the apostles, must have been materially promoted by the observance of one system of discipline. The Church of the Jews estab- lished by Moses, was one religious society, comprising the whole nation. When the same God, who had given the Mosaic law, imparted the new dispensation to his chosen people, the first object of Christianity seems to have been, to continue to preserve the whole nation as one religious society. For this purpose they were for many years publicly appealed to, by the teaching, miracles, and fulfilment of the prophecies by our Lord. They were next appealed to by the apostles, and their attempts were also fruitless. Then only it was, that the nation of the Jews, considered as a peo])lc in their corporate capacity, re- 106 FAITH AND GOVERNMENT OF Julian Pe- in the fear of the Lord, and in the comfort of the Holy I^yddj Vufgafira, ^^^^t, were multiplied. 40. presented by their senate and legislature, rejected the God of their fathers (a). The exertions of the apostles were next directed to save as many of their nation who would believe from the errors of their blinded countrymen, to become the founders of that new religious society, which was to be extended among all nations. The especial providence of God preserved from dissensions the infant Church thus composed, till the period of its more ample enlargement arrived. The converts at Jerusalem, therefore, were so confirmed in the truth of their creed, and were so perfectly governed by their apostolical rulers,that when the period of their dispersion came, they carried an uncorrupted and an uncontro- verted faith over the world. And as every society must be governed by some authority, they would have taken with them that plan of polit}', which the apostles would have established. The question, therefore, of the mode of Church government observed by the apostles becomes interesting and important, as it will point out to us that plan by which the Christian Church was intended to continue as one religious society : for as the Jews were thus united as one Church, into one religious society, so it was designed that the whole world should become one holy and catholic Church, of which each nation should become a separate branch. In all inquiries of this nature, it is our first duty to refer to facts, before we proceed to inferences. These are recorded in the nine first chapters of the Acts, and from them certain infer- ences have been deduced. An apostle was elected from among the brethren to fill the place of Judas — we infer therefore that the apostolic office was superior to that of the disciples The persons who sold their lands for the benefit of the poor, placed the proceeds at the disposal of the apostles. — It has been inferred, therefore, that the apostles not only directed the ge- neral concerns of the Church, but ordered even the manage- ment of the contributions. The primitive Church believed, from this instance, that the benefactions of the members of a Church, for religious purposes, should be consigned to the charge of the governors and rulers of those Churches, and not be distributed at the caprice or pleasure of private individuals. The election of deacons has been already considered. They were chosen from among the people, presented to the apostles, and appointed to the service for which they were required, after tliey had been approved by the twelve. — The primitive Church has uniformly considered the election of the seven dea- cons, and their a[)pointment by the apostles, to be the right mode of ordination among Christians for ever. The conduct of Christ and his holy apostles, the men who were moved by the Spirit of God, was believed to be as binding among Christians, as the institutions of the law of Moses were obligatory among the Jews. After the death of Stephen, the great body of the Church, as has been before observed, was dispersed all round Jerusa- lem. The apostles alone continued in that city ; and we read, in consetjuence ofthe great success of Philip the Deacon and Evan- gelist in Samaria, the twelve sent down two of their number to impart to the new converts the gift of the Holy Ghost. Whether this was done merely to strengthen the new converts— or to confirm them in the usual sense of that word— or to ordain ciders for the purpose of supplying the incipient congregations THE CHURCH AT JERUSALEM— CHAP. IX. 107 Julian Pe- — or to bestow the miraculous gifts of the Holy Spirit, (for all Lydda. riod,4753. these have been inferred,) it is not necessary to decide. The Vulgar^Era, important fact is certain; the ministerial function was con- 40. trolled and subject to a superior ecclesiastical authority, which was demonstrated by the fulfilling of more solemn duties than subordinate preachers were empowered to perform. Christian teachers exercised government over other Christian teachers, and likewise over their converts, without either the permission or the interference of the people. And from the recorded fact, we are justified in concluding that this system of ecclesiastical discipline was uniformly observed by the apostles, and, as such, must be the best model for all their successors. Before the Gentiles, or the Proselytes of the Gate, were invited to become members of the Christian Church, St. Paul was mira- culously converted. Three years after which he preached Christ in the synagogues, apparently without either the sanction of an apostle, or the request of the people. This illustrious con- vert, although he cannot be admitted as a general example, had also authority for what he did. He was (as Biscoe on the Acts, p. 271, has proved,) an ordained elder, doctor, or teacher, among the Jews, and possessed the privilege of preaching in the synagogues. In addition to this human ordination, he was miraculously filled with the Holy Ghost, as a qualification for his high office. • He was set apart by the divine Head of the Church himself, who appeared to him from heaven, and com- missioned him to go to the Gentiles. We are now brought to the most important part of the sub- ject— the nature of the authority which was thus exercised by one class of Christian teachers over both the other teachers and the first converts : or, in other words, of what nature was the apostolic office, and what kind of government therefore is to be exercised in the Christian Church? It will appear, from the united testimony of the Scripture itself, and the authority of some of the most learned tlieologians who have adorned the Christian world, yet who have been adverse to the episcopal re- gimen, that the word apostle was well known among the Jews, and that it denoted an officer of high influence and authority, who exercised a delegated power over the ministers and people of separate and distant congregations. Though the Jews where dispersed throughout the world at the time of our Lord, their numerous congregations were under the control of the High Priest and Sanhedrim ; and the persons who were sent by them were called their apostles. While every separate congregation was governed by its own rulers of the synagogue, or councils of ten, or three, or twenty-three, the whole Jewish Church, through all its departments, was sub- ject to the authority of the heads of the Church at Jerusalem, and the Romans protected the Jews in exercising the right of governing their own countrymen (fe). The Jews, therefore, were accustomed to submit to the control of the Sanhedrim, and would not, when converted to Christianity, object to a continuance of that form of government to which they had thus submitted. We will, however, consider the word in all its significations. I. The word apostle, aTrooroXoc, says the learned Witsius, literally signifies one who is sent forth. It was used among the Greeks for the word — II. (^pecr^tvg oLTrotrTtWofifvog, neairrjg slprivt]g fve/ca, i.e. an am- bassador, one sent forth, a mediator to make or establish peace. III. More especially, 6 (xrpartjybg kutu ttXSv infnr6fif.vog, the leader sent on a naval expedition. Hcsychius. IV. ^vfiv, by men, but of God himself, and his Son Jesus Christ, Gal. i. 1. What necessity could there be that this in- spired writer should thus accurately define the nature of his commission, and so particularly mark the distinction between himself and an apostle invested with mere human authority, if the Jews, to whom that epistle is principally addressed, had been strangers to that other kind of apostles commissioned by men, namely, apostles sent by the Jewish High Priest and magistrates, to the different cities of the Roman empire? This interpretation was long since given to the words of the apostle by St. Jerome, Comm. ad Galatas, tom. ix. opp. p. 124. edit. Francof usque hodie, says he, a patriarchis Judaeorum apos- tolis mitti (constat) ad distinctionem itaque eorum qui mit- tuntur ab horainibus, et sui qui sit missus a Christo, tale sumpsit exordium: Paulus apostolus, non ab hominibus, neque per hominem. These words of St. Jerome, who resided in Palestine, and was every way skilled in Jewish affairs, must necessarily be allowed to weigh strongly in favour of the above statement respecting the apostles of the High Priest. The meaning they convey, indisputably is, that, in the time of St. Paul, it was the practice of the Jewish High Priest to send forth apostles, after the same manner as the Jewish patriarchs were accustomed to do at the time he, St. Jerome, wrote : and there appears to be no reason whatever which should induce us 110 FAITH AND GOVERNMENT OF Julian Pe- to question the credibility of what is thus said. But let us Lydda riod, 4753. return to the words of St, Paul, in which there is something Vulgar^ra, worthy of remark, which, if my memory does not fail me, 4^' says Mosheim, has never hitherto attracted the attention of any commentator. St. Paul sa^'s, that he is an apostle, not of men, neither by man. He therefore clearly divides human apostles into two classes ; viz. those who were commissioned merely by one man, and those who were invested with their powers by several. Now what does this mean ? Who are these men, and who that single man, who, in St. Paul's time, were accustomed to send amongst the Jews certain persons, whom it was usual to distinguish by the appellation of apostles ? The single man to whom Paul alludes, could, I conceive, have been none other than the great High Priest of the Jews ; and the several men, who had also their apostles, were un- questionably the archontes, or Jewish magistrates. The learned well know that justice was administered to the Jews who dwelt in the different provinces of the Roman empire by certain magistrates, or vicegerents of the High Priest, who were termed, after the Greek, archontes, concerning whom a curious and elegant little work was published by Wesseling, ad Inscript. Beren Traject ad Rhen. 1738, in 8vo. I take the meaning, therefore, of St. Paul to be, that he neither de- rived his commission from those inferior magistrates, to whom the Jews who dwelt without the limits of Palestine were sub- jects, nor was he delegated by the chief of their religion, the High Priest himself. That these archontes had under them certain ministers, who were termed apostles, much in the same way as the High Priest had, is clear from Eusebius, who says — ATToaroXovQ ^e tlakri Kal vvv eOog Icrriv ladaioig ovojxd^Hv tsq to. kyKVKXia ygdfifxaTa iragd raiv APXONTQN avTiZv aTriKOfieZoixevsg. Apostolos etiam nunc Judaji eos appellare solent qui archon- tum suorum litteras circumquaque deportare solent. Comment, in Esaiam. cap, 18, in Montfauconii. CoUectione nova Patr. Graacor. tom. ii. p. 424. Mosheim goes on to prove, that the aversion of the Jews to Christianity, must have prevented them from borrowing this title from the Christian Church. As the High Priest had pro- bably twelve apostles, to correspond with the number of the tribes, he supposes our Lord appointed twelve also, in allu- sion to the same. This however is uncertain (g). The learned Vitringa(/i), who had endeavoured to identify the officers of the Christian Church entirely with those of the synagogue, writes, that he is doubtful of the meaning of the words -nnv wbur. I cannot suspect this eminent theologian of disingcnuousness, or I should be inclined to suppose that his ignorance in the present instance could be accounted for in no other way ; for he expresses himself on other occasions with sufficient decision. St, Paul, in two passages of his Epistles, (2 Cor. viii. 23. Phil. ii. 25.) decidedly applies the expression " Apostles of the Churches," to Epaphroditus and Titus, both of whom, ecclesiastical history informs us, were bishops. Vitringa, (p. 913.) would apply the term exclusively to the collectors of the money provided by the Churches for the necessities of their members : and to this sense it is also limited by Witsius, Benson, Doddridge, and the divines in ge- neral who object to that form of Church government which existed in the early ages of Christianity. It is certain the of- fice of the apostle embraced with this, other duties of a much higher and important nature: and these several duties, with the high authority attached to them, must be included in our definition of the office of the apostle. THE CHURCH AT JERUSALEM— CHAP. IX. HI Julian Pe- Bishop Taylor has placed this part of the subject in its Lydda. riod, 4753. proper light. Now these men were not called 'AttootoXoi, rces- VuIgaiiEra, senders, in respect of these Churches sending them with their 40. contributions: 1. Because they are not called the apostles of these Churches, to wit, whose alms they carried; but simply 'Ekk\7](tiujv, of the Churches, vi/. of their own of which they were bishops. For if the title of apostle had related to their mission from these Churches, it is unimaginable that there should be no term of relation expressed. 2 It is very clear that although they did indeed carry the benevolence of the se- veral Churches, yet St. Paul, not those Churches, sent them: " And we have sent them with our brother,'' &c. 3. They are called apostles of the Churches, not going from Corinth with the money, but before they came thither, from whence they were to be dispatched in legation to Jerusalem: ''If any in- quire of Titus, or the brethren, they are the apostles of the Church, and the glory of Christ." So they were apostles be- fore they went to Corinth, not for their being employed in the transportation of their charity (i). Vitringa proceeds further to assert, in the most positive man- ner, that there were not in the Christian Churches any ambas- sadors of this nature; and that the only ministers were bishops and presbyters, which were the same, and deacons. It is most true that there were no officers in the synagogue itself bearing the titleof apostle, and confined exclusively to the performing of the religious service of one particular synagogue ; and it is the very point which I have been endeavouring to establish, and on which the whole question depends. There were, however, among the Jews, officers of this name, whose duty it was to superintend the synagogues at the command of the High Priest; in allusion to which, it is highly probable tliat Christ, our great High Priest, distinguished his chosen disciples by the same ap- pellation, when he invested them with a similar power of superintendence over their converts ; implying that those whom he had appointed should have the same intluence and authority over his Churches, as the apostles of the High Priest and San- hedrim possessed over the synagogues. The apostles of Christ were not ministers of single congregations; the apostles of the High Priest did not confine themselves to the superintendence of one synagogue. The jurisdiction of both extended over countries and districts. As the necessity of government for the new societies made the apostolic office essential in the period when the Church was most pure, so is a similar power of go- vernment and superintendence essential at present. It has always been required; and we find accordingly, though the name of apostle was discontinued with the twelve and St. Paul, that the power of ordaining, confirming, and governing, was preserved in the purer ages of our faith, before the papacy usurped upon the primitive episcopacy ; or the foreign re- formers rejected the latter, in their eager and justifiable ab- horrence of the former. Vitringa, however, acknowledges, in another place (h), that the Sanhedrim sent out persons with ample powers to su- perintend the synagogues out of the precincts of the Holy Land. St. Paul calls Christ the Apostle and High Priest of our (i, e. the Christian) profession, (Heb. iii. I.) lie was an apostle, as having received a delegated authority from God over his worshippers ; for we read, God anointed him to preach the Gospel to the poor. He was the High Pritst, as he himself sent out apostles, with the same delegated authority as he had 112 FAITH AND GOVERNMENT OF Julian Pe- **6ceived over his Christian Churches. His own words are, " As Lydda riod 4753. ^he Father hath sent me, even so send I you." Viilo^ariEra That the Sanhedrim, about the time of our Lord's incarna- 40. " ' tion, possessed and exerted the privilege of sending out apos- tles, is amply demonstrated by several Roman laws(Z). The Jews were allowed, says Mr. Briscoe, to meet to pay their first- fruits, and to send them together, with whatever money they pleased, to Jerusalem for offerings (m), and to appoint proper officers to carry it. They were suflered also to determine all dis- putes and controversies among themselves in a judicial way. They were not only thus indulged in the use of their own cus- toms and laws, but, what is much more, if any laws of the country, where they inhabited, interfered with their customs, they were dispensed with, and not obliged to comply with those laws. Thus, for instance, they were dispensed with in not attending courts of judicature, or giving bail on their sabbaths or feast- days. Thus may it be sufficient to shew, that when the Gospel was preached to the Church, while it consisted of Jewish converts only, the authority which was exercised by the apostles was not a new thing, nor inconsistent with the manners and customs of the people under their former Mosaic discipline. The same principle of government was adhered to, that order, unity, and faith might still prevail. But instead of the persecuting letters and the armed bands, which were the credentials of the apostles of the former econo.uy, the chosen apostles of the legislator of a better dispensation, were known by the influences of the Spirit, by holiness, purity, patience, and love. They were armed only with the power of truth and miracles, and they proclaimed the Messiahship of Jesus of Nazareth, and the glad tidings of salva- tion to all mankind. The Spirit of God, attended with its visible influences, the outward means of grace; the Christian priesthood and the Christian people were united in one faith and one dis- cipline ; tbe religion of the heart, which alone is spiritual and efficacious, was preserved by a stcdfast adherence to the pre- scribed rites and forms of the apostolic Church : for the primi- tive Christians believed that He who gave the wine of the king- dom to man, provided also the earthen vessels, by which its spirit was preserved. (a) Vitringa gives a beautiful description of the union of the Church at Jerusalem. Primae Ecclesiae Christianae, Deo per praeconium Cliristi atque Apostolorum et copiosam distributionem donorura spiritns sancti lucem h tenebris producente, formosa erat et splendissima tacies. Om- nia, ut vere solent, ridebant. Doctrinae suas constabant castimoiiia. Nihil in cultn, nihil in sacratissimis religionis symbolis adulteiimum re- giminis forma optima et ecclesiae indoli convenientissima. Disciplinae vigebat exercitiuin iucorruptae. Diaboli adversus ecclesiam ferocieutis impetus eatenus a Deo cohibebantur, ut per satellites suos, principes niuudanos, cursum Evangelii non sufflamen atterit. H.Treticis nuUus adbucdum in ecclesia loous. Et, quod optimum et maximum et post doctrinae sinceritatem pra^cipuam in ecclesia considerationem meretur, excellebat divina ilia credentium aivi apostolici societas, quibuslibet virtutibus Christianis, et perfusa erat largo imbre donorum spiritus sancti. Hie conspicua erant fides illibata, vegeta, corroborata, omnia tentans, omnia potens, Zelus pro divina gloria et caussa Cliristi Regis ardentissimus, nulla metuens pericula, nullis languescens malis; cLa- ritas rara, inaudita, et quasi supergressa limites lege pr;escriptos , gra- tissima aniraorum concordia, juncta simplicitate, omnes de malo sus- 4)iciones excludenti ; mansuetudo, beuignitas, huuiilitas, et qii« plura in Cliristiano homine pra^dicanda sunt. His virtutibus elegante harmo- oia intexta erant dotes scientiae, sapiential, prudentia;, sanctitatis, pro- phetia?, linguarum, charismatuu), h'tpyeiag, miraculorum, qua; banc THE CHURCH AT JEFiUSALEM-CHAP. IX. 113 Julian Pe- ecclesia^ prlniaev^ statiun divinum prorsus efficiebant ac coelesfem, eique Dainaso,,, nod. 4748. magnam apud ex^teros consiliabant reverentiain. Rectores, omnibus "'"'*'^"«- Vulgar^ra, necessariis virtutibus donisque i.istructi, sua erga plebem ofTicia dili- 35. genter observabant, absque atleotato in earn imperio ; plebs Christiana rectonbus cum houore pr^stabat obsequium ; vel potius, omnes ut fratres se urn regi et domino, Chrisfo Jesu, arctissimo amoris vinculo compacti subj.ciebant, ab ejus herentes ore. ejusque ducti sniritu — Vitrinpja Observ. sacra.-, lib. iv. cap. vii. p. 901. (b) Princinem vero post patnarchas dignitatis locum obtinebant illi quos Apostolus vooa bant, rusi nos fallit Epiphanius, lib. 1. tom. 2. Ha^res xxx ^ 4 npocreSpevsai ydp ru Trarpiapxr], Kai avv alru, TroWciKig, Kal iv vvKTi, Kai tv vfispa, (Xvvex(Je, Sidyaci, hd to av^PsXivuv Kai avacptpuv avTUi rd Kara vofiov. Assident enim hi patriarchal et cum eosaepius diu, noctuque coutinuo versantur : quod eidem a consiliis sint ac de lis referant qua? ad legem pertinere videbantur. Est enin. aurum coronarium, qua; diversarum ordines curiarum vel amore proprio. vel in- dulgent.arum Ifrtitia vel rebus prospere gestis. admoniti, in coronis aureis signisque diversis obtulerit. Lege iv. Cod. Theod. de Aur. Coron Wit 1 sii. Exerc. Sac. xu. de Historia Hieros.p. 653. Succedit vox, m^li-quam sibi attribuit Ahia.s 1 Reg. xiv.G. ybn mbu' Oi3N ubi LXX. A7r6 vertuiit. Habebantetiam -nnv ^n^bir, \e\bnp,d7r6(TToXsg Tijg iKKXnaiac nuncios, coetus, qui raandata deferrent ad synagogas Hierosoljmam vel victnnas «t decimas ad sacerdotes : maxime qui didpaxfiov, semisiclum tnbutum quotanms ex lege in sacrarium difterendum, exigerent. Dein collapsis Judajorum rebus retenta tamen in synagoga vox, A-ocrroXwv est; talesque signate dicebantur, qui patriarchs; assessores et legati erant, ejusque lyKvKXia, ypdmiaTci, circulares literas ad sygnagoiras deterebant pecumis per capita colligendis, speciatira auro coronario co- ronas scilicet patriarchali ornanda;, quod loco didragmi exigebant patri- archa;inpartibus taraorientis, quamoccidentis Wits.Melet. Leid.p.2'> (c) Lighttoot's "Works, Pitman's edition, vol. iii. p. 196. (rf) Schoet"- gen Hora; Hebraica;, vol. i. p. 937. who has added this also to his quotations. Sic ex Nedarim apud R. Samuel Ben David in fol. 28 2 KWni-T^m'ru'iK Dn ^tt ^mh^; ^3n3 on bxiou' fDn, num sacerdotes apostoh propne an vero apostoli Dei? Quid inde vero? resp. Si dici- mus, eos esse apostolos propria auctoritate venientes, non necesse est ut sacerdos, sitjustus. Si vero dicimus, eos esse apostolos Dei, uecesse est, ut justi smt. (e) Mosheim, to prove the truth of his assertions ?n"?i?r / Ti' r^tavius. and Wesseling, from various passages' in the Codex Theodosianus, and other ancient authors, that after the destruction of Jenisalem, the Jewish patriarchs, who mav be consi- dered, in a certain degree, as supplying the place of the High Priests, attached to themselves certain ministers of great trust and authority under the denommation of apostles, which is a strong corroboration of what has been already advanced. Vid. J. Gothefredus ad codicem ■Iheodosianum, tom. vi. p. 251, 252. edit. Ritterian. Dion. Peta. A -J -"., --»!. v.. Y3. ^.ji, ^.j^. euii. xvmenan. l>ion. Fetavius Animadvers. ad Epiphamum ad Hasres. xxx. et de Hierarchia Eccles. lib. 1. cap. VI. p. 16. et lib. ii. cap. ii. § x. p. 45. in dogmatibus theo- log.cis, torn. IV. Petr. Wesseling de Archontibus Judajorum, p. 91. a„ Moshe.m, vol. .. p. 120. (/) Convenit pr^terea quod vim significa- tion.s cum t.tulo ^»"ch may as well be rendered Thy proselytes which are within thy gates; that is, the nroso lytes ot the gate that dwell with thee!' For the H^brc^n'rord" iothin't'h 78:"^fi^«,a stranger, signifieth also a proselyte, and both in this place and in the fourth commandmcntdenote the same Uiing. lor no strangers were permitted to dwell within their gates, unless they renounced idolatry, and were proselyted so ^r as to the observance of the seven precepts of the sons of Noah Though they were slaves taken in war, they were not permitted to live with them within any of the gates of Jerus« Jem, on any other terms; but, on their refSsal thus fur tj comply, were either given up to the sword, or sold to some foreign people And as those who were thus far made prosely es were admitted to dwell with them, so also were they admitted into he temple, there to worship God ; but were 7ot aM wed ,r th. r ""?M^"^'''^^ '^'"^ '"*^ **'^^«"ter court, called he o^,Vt i the Gentiles. For into the imier courts, which were wit in the enclosure, called the chel, none were^dmittedrbuTon J TWO SORTS OF PROSELYTES Julian Pe- SECTION I. C^sarea. VulgSra, St. Peter sees a Vision, in which he is commanded to visit aVtnnt do. such as were thorough professors of the whole Jewish religion. And therefore, when any of these sojourning proselytes came into the temple, they always worshipped in the court. And ot this sort of proselytes Naaman the Syrian, and Cornelius the centurion, are held to have been. /. • x- The other sort of proselytes, called the proselytes of justice were such as took on them the observance of the whole Jewish Taw For although the Jews did not hold this necessary for u^i as were not of this nation yet they refused none, but dadlv received all who would embrace their religion ; and they arc remarked in our Saviour's time to have been very sedulous fn their endeavours to make converts, and when any were thus proselyted to the Jewish religion they were initiated to it bj Taptism, sacrifice, and circumcision, and t^^^nf forth were ad- mitted to all the rites, ceremonies, and privileges, that \\eie used by the natural Jews. -r j t> It was on this generally received opinion that Lord Barring- ton r6^ framed his hypothesis, which demonstrates, beyond a doubt the separate manner in which the Jews, the devout Gentiles, or proselytes of the gate, were severally converted to rheCbr tian^faith.^ The holy Gospel, like the grain of mus- tard seed was of gradual developement, and progressively re- vealed "o'the world' We have al.Udy seen tha^^^^^^^Pt"" first preached to the Jews, and that the first Christian Church was established at Jerusalem. The period in which the Gospel IZ onfined to the Jews and proselytes of rigMeousness, who enioved all the privileges of the former, is supposed to com- Se according to Lord Barrington at the year 29 and end in the vear 41. The second period, when the Gospel was preached to the proselytes of the gate, begins at the year 41 to 45 The third, when it was preached to the idolatrous Geii- tiles is from the year 45 to the year 70. wliich brings us to the end of the Jewish age, and the destruction of the Jewish state and nation, which implied the abolition of the law of Moses, relieved the Jews and the proselytes of the §atefroin their ad- he ence to those laws, and consequently destroyed t^e distinction of the three periods ; all men being then bound only to the faith and obedience of the Gospel, and a subjection to the aws of those countries in which they respectively resided. The more minute divisions of the noble author it will not be necessary to notice, as they appear to me less corroborated Than the others, and are not referred to in the present arrange- "^Dr. Lardner's proposition, in reply to this bypothesi^s of three divisions, is-there was but one sort of prose ytes (c). He then proceeds to describe them by the usual character, istics unTveVsally acknowledged to belong to proselytes of rthteousne^sUhey were call?d - strangers, or proselytes with- [i the Jite," and "sojourners," as they were allowed to dwel or soiourn among the people of Israel. They vvere so called because thev could not possess land ; the whole of Canaan beinrby the law of Mosses, appropriated to the twelve tribes """l!' In defence of this hypothesis. Dr. I^^/.^^r T of whil' xii 48. Lev. xvii. 8. Num. ix. 14. and xv. 15, 10. all of which ordain a perfJc" similiarity between the Israelite and the so- AMONG THE ANCIENT JEWS-CHAP. X. II7 ioH^"^??Q ^ <7ew«27e, who had been miraculously instructed to send Joppa and VaLrlirt fir St, Peter. Cacsarea. VaJgar^ra, about 40. journ.ng stranger.— Answer. These passages appear to prove that there were certain proselytes, or sojourners ; who were not however permitted to partake of the passovcr, or offer sacri- lice, iniiess they were circumcised. 2. He is of opinion, that no strangers but those who thus conformed implicitly to the law of Moses, were permitted to dNvell m Canaan i with the exception of travellers or mercantile aliens, whose abode however was not to be considered perma nent.— Ans. This is assuming the point to be proved 3. Dr.Lardner supposes that Eph. ii. 13. contains an allu- sion to the custom of receiving strangers as perfect proselytes in the Jewish commonwealth.— Ans. This may be, but the jre- neral opinion that there were two kinds of proselytes, is not thereby overthrown. 4. The \yord proselyte. Dr. Lardner observes, is of Greek origin, equivalent to "stranger," long since become a tech- nical word, denoting a convert to the Jewish religion, or a Jew byreligion.-Ans. It exactly corresponds to the Hebrew word 13, Which means stranger and convert. win ^\^^! are called, in the fourth commandment, the stranger within thy gates.-Ans. This passage is quoted by PrideaSx (see above reference (a), to prove Ihe opposite opinin ' wPr'p nnfv^r'' ^8:reeably to the law of Moses, reckoned there were only three sorts of men in the world: Israelites, called a so home-born, or natives; strangers M'ithin their gates : and aliens-or otherwise, there were but two sorts of men cir- cumcised or uncircumcised, Jews and Gentiles, or Heathens— Ans. The proselytes of righteousness were always considered as naturalized Jews, and enjoyed all the privileges as such- or it may be otherwise answered, that the strangers within the gate might refer to the two kinds of proselytes. ° =* ''""i" ^^le Dr. Lardner next asserts, that the word proselyte was alwavs understood in the sense which he gives to it by ancien Chris tian writers. In support of his ar|ument he adduces the au mTl^l fll'dl^'^^'^^^ Euthy'mius, and Chri^stfan Drulh: mar who all dehne a proselyte as one who bein? of Gentilfl or.ginal, had embraced circumcision and JudaisS : and tha? the notion of two sorts of proselytes cannot be found in anv Christian writer before the fourteenth eentury or later ^ ThP h .1 ^r^-^u"" H^'""^^ ^^^^^"^^ «^ Scripture in our favmir o^hL'^elllnetTd"!"^ Maimonides, mentions them, asUlT'a^- -Ans^Xt hP •! "?* ^^al'ed a proselyte in the New Testament, to^p^osefy'fes'of Uie'g^Tj'^' ""' ''''''^^ characteristics attributed 9. The apostle refused to preach the Gospel to Cornelius because he was uncircumcised, (Acts xi. 3.)-Ans The pro e! lyteof the gate like every other uncircumcised Gentile^ was regarded as polluted and unclean. Lightfoot, who cafl's The ?:r.^/r*^ 't ^^^" sojourning stra„ge%, observes ft on Ke i^ToeiteZ'lh ';li-r'po::s^- ' '''' ^ '''^^-"^^^ ^^-"^^ - in^^- piX!:^i^r jur;;t"sl!:^.r:n^ t K ortdTJe'^^'^'^r'-'; *" *^^^^' and'aii otL 'l ; An! -ru "^^^ character comprehends all Gentilp, — Ans. There seems to be a striking difference between th. ns THE PROSELYTES OF THE GATE ARE .PTQ V 1—17 Joppaand Julian Pe- ACTS X. 1 1 / . Caesarea. 'vlaflr-a, There vvas a certain man in Cesarea called Cornelius, about 40. a centurion of the band called the Italian band. commission of St. Peter, who was more P^^^^icuady he apostle of the circumcision, and the commission of St. Paul who was the chosen vessel otChrist,to bear the testimony of the Gospel to the Gentiles. (Acts ix. 15.) The words - I wdl «end thee far hence to the Gentiles," (Acts xxii. 21.) demonstrates the nature o? his appointment,' and the character oi those nat^on^ he was commanded to visit, which were beyond dispute idola- trous. St. Peter, to whom the keys of the kingdom ot heaven h,ul bcnu committed, (Matt, xvir 19.) is peculiarly employed for the admission of the devout Gentiles; ^"f the conver. on of Cornelius has ever been considered as the farst fruits of the Gentiles, in .vhom they were all typically cleansed and sancti- fied. If however St. Peter had been generally sent to the Gentiles, why was St. Paul so miraculously set apart for that ^TrDr. Lardner gives this remark of Sueur, speaking of St. Paul's vision of the sheet, - God thereby shewed unto his se- cant, that henceforward he would have all the People of the world, without exception, called to partake m his gracious Covenant in his Son Jesus Christ, and to the knowledge of sal- vation by him." It was so understood by the primitive Chris- tians, the apostles, and evangelists. ^^^^nnl mn Ans. Granted; but this by no means opposes a gradual con- vefsion, but seems rather to corroborate it. Providence in all his dealings with man, has ever observed a P^^^S;,^^^^;;^,;^^^"^ the divine dispensations have been always §»-^^d"^'^y ""^f.^^^J" Although the apostles were commanded to evangehze a 1 nat ns it appears they did not comprehend the ^"1' J^^^*^"^^ «^. . ^f jj missiin: a vision was necessary to convince St Peter that .t was lawful for him to converse or to preach the Gospel to an uncircumcised Gentile. .i * n ^ /^«,.i;ir.- This vision established the divine intention that the Gentj^e. shou d all be admitted into the Christian Church; a" d after the prejudices and scruples of this zealous apostle had, by^the Lterveition of Almighty power been overcome and a de.out Gentile had been received into the Christian Chu. ch, ^ ' P^^"'? bv a similar interventi.ni, by a trance in the temple ob Uined hL connnission to teach and to preach to ^ ^^^^^^^^^"^ atrous Gentiles. The vision of the sheet dcmonstiatcd the conversion of the heathen world, and it must have acted as an encouragement to St. Paul, who was made the chicl inslrument ''^ilr.^SlSttother volume, adduces similar argunieuts against this hypothesis, which do not however appear more satisfactory ^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^.^.^^^ ^^^ o,p.nion of LordBarrinoton and Dr. Benson, that the conversion of the idolatmus Gentiles was unknown to the Church at Jerusalem, tn aTn^ri^oused this part of the theory of ti^^^^^^^^ nent theologians, it is not necessary to ^"t; ./"'^'^^'^^'^'^tion jn Dr. Lardner, however, has omitted to mention to me appears the principal objection,) that it would qucstio (what ir\>:^^p^;^ tX^e c::;;^.ed the circumsta.ce of the conversion oHhe Gentiles, as the Jews went up >«« 1> <':^'" ^,^;' provinces to Jerusalem, and some oi Ihcm must have known, RECEIVED INTO THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH— CHAP. X. 119 Julian Pe- 2 A devout man, and one that feared God, with all his Joppa and riod, 4753. Caesarea. Vulgar^ra, about 40. and would without doubt have communicated, the exertions of St. Paul. Josephus (d) tells us that all the worshippers of God, from every part of the world, sent presents to the temple at Jerusa- lem. His expression is the same as that which is used in Scrip- ture (e), which Dr. Lardner arbitrarily interprets as referring to the proselytes of righteousness : and he would render the word at^ofxevoi by worshipper, or proselyte of righteousness only — TTavTuv Tiov Kara Tt]v oiKovfxevijv Iovdaiii)v, kul aitoixtvuiv TOJV Qeov. But when we consider the very extensive manner in which the word (xatofisvoi (e) is used in the New Testament, it is not reasonable to confine it to this verj limited sense ; in addition to which there is an evident distinction made in diflerent parts of the Acts, between the Jews (the proselytes of righteousness being always considered as such,) and the devout persons by whatever name they were distinguished. — See Acts xvii. 4. 17. xiii. 43. 50. Doddridge principally objects to the theory of two sorts of proselytes on the same grounds as Dr. Lardner, whose argu- ments he strenuously supports in opposition to those of Bar- rington and Benson. In his note on Acts xi. 20. he would refer the word 'EWijvag to the idolatrous as well as to the believing or devout Gen- tiles. Dr. Hales ( / ) has professed himself to be convinced by the arguments of Dr. Lardner and Doddridge. Among the many eminent authorities who agree in the opinion which I have adopted, that there were two sorts of proselytes, maybe ranked Selden (y), Witsius {h), and Spencer, who defends this side of the question at great length, in his De legibus Hebraeorum. Michaelis (h) justly observes, whoever also acknowledged the revealed religion of the Jews to be divine, was not according to it under the least obligation to be circumcised. This is a point which is very often misunderstood, from circumcision being always represented as a sacrament equivalent to baptism, and from its being inferred without any authority from the Bible, and merely from that arbitrary notion, that since the time of Abraham, circumcision became universally necessary to eternal happiness. Moses has nowhere given any command, nor even so much as an exhortation, inculcating the duty of circumcision upon any person not a descendant or slave of Abraham, or of his descendants, unless he wished to partake of the passover : and in the more ancient ordinance relative to it, mention is made only of Abraham's posterity and servants. (Gen. xvii.) In none of the historical books of the Old Testament do we any where find the smallest trace of a circumcision necessary to the salvation of foreigners, who acknowledged the true God, or re- quisite even to the confession of their faith ; no, not so much as in the detailed story of Naaman, (2 Kings v.) in which indeed every circumstance rather indicates, that the circumcision of that illustrious personage can never be supposed. In later times, indeed, long after the Babylonish captivity, there arose among the Jews a set of irrational zealots, with whom the apos- tle Paul has a great deal to do in his epistles, and who insisted on the circumcision even of heathens, as necessary to salvation. But they were opposed not only by the aposllr, but also even 120 THE DEVOUT GENTILES ARE Julian Pe- housc, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed Joppa and riod. 4T53. ^ q j j^av. Caesarea. VulgaryEra, •' about 40. ' — before his time, and without any view to Christianity, by other temperate but strictly religious Jews. Vitringa(fe) acknowledges the distinction. The learned Drusins (?), Calmet (m), Lightfoot(n), with the best English commentators (o), Danzius(p), in a very learned treatise, as well as Schoctgen {q), who has drank so deeply of the fountain of Talmudical knowledge, agree with Lord Barring- ton, and have collected many testimonies to prove the same point. In the Critici Sacri, vol. x. p. 155. sect. 14. arc two disserta- tions by John Frischmuthius, on the Seven Precepts of Noah, who endeavours to prove that there were two sorts of prose- lytes. He quotes the words of Maimonides, upon which alone, as Dr. Lardner supposes, the whole question originated (r). We learn from these treatises that Deut. xiv. 21. was interpreted of the proselytes of the gate, by R. Mose Bar. Nachman, p. 156. sect. XX. : while others of the ancients considered it referring to the proselytes of justice. Kimchi says it denoted both, or either: and this seems the most probable opinion. The ques- tion, indeed, seems never to have been doubted till Lardner proposed his objections to Lord Barrington's hypothesis, which, as we have now seen, is corroborated by the best and most learned authorities. It is certain lliat in the time of the apostles there were a large class of persons who were neither Jews nor idolatrous Gentiles, and who, if they were not called proselytes of the gate, and re- ceived among, the Jews in that capacity ; were at least wor- shippers of the one true God — observed the hours of prayer — gave alms, and built synagogues, because they desired to please God — they must have been known, esteemed, and beloved by the Jews for their actions, although they refused to associate with them, because they were uncircumcised and Gentiles. After the Gospel had been made known to the Jews and Sama- ritans, to whom could the blessings of the new dispensation with more evident propriety have been revealed than to those devout Gentiles who worshipped the God of Israel, and devoted them- selves and their wealth to his service. God has ever imparted his spiritual knowledge to men, in pro- portion to their purity and holiness of life — " He that doeth my will, shall know of the doctrine whether it be of God." The ful- ness of time for the admission of the Gentiles into the Church, as revealed long before by the prophets, had now arrived. The wall of partition was now broken down, and the devout Gen- tiles, as a pledge or an earnest of the approaching conversion of the whole heathen world, were admitted even into the holy place, the sanctuary of their God. The beautiful prayer of Solomon, on the dedication of the second temple, is another strong evidence in support of the hypothesis of different sorts of proselytes. Dean Graves (s) re- marks, " We find the principle here stated, publicly and so- lemnly recognized : ' Moreover, concerning a stranger that is not of thy people Israel, but comcth out of a far country for thy name's sake ; for they shall hear of thy great name, and of thy strong hand, and of thy stretched out arm, when he shall come and pray towards this place j hear thou in heaven thy dwelling place, and do according to all that the sfrangrr callcth to thcc for: that all people of the earth may know thy name to fear RECEIVED INTO THE CHRISTIAN CHURCH—CIIAP. X. 12 1 Julian Pe- 3 He saw in a vision, evidently about the ninth hour Joppa and riod, 4753. Caesarea. Vulgar^ra, about 40. thee, as do lliy people Israel ; and that they may know that this house which I have builded, is called by thy name.* And again, at the conclusion of this devout address, the monarch prays, ' Let these my words, wherewith I have made supplication be- fore the Lord, be nigh unto the Lord our God day and night, that he may maintain the cause of his servant, and the cause of his people Israel, as the matter shall require : that all the people of the earth may know that the Lord is God, and that there is none else.' In this remarkable passage, which is the more de- cisive as it contains a solemn recognition of the principles and objects of the Jewish law, proceeding from the highest human authority, and sanctioned by the immediate approbation of God, whose glory filled the house of the Lord, during this solemn supplication, we perceive it is clearly laid down not only that the Jewish scheme was adapted and designed to make ' all the people of the earth know that the Lord was God, and that there was none else ; but also that the stranger from the remotest region, who should be led to believe in and to worship the true God, was not only permitted, but called and encouraged to pray towards the temple at Jerusalem,' to join in the devotions of the chosen people of God, and equally with them hope for the divine favour, and the acceptance of his prayers ; without be- coming a citizen of the Jewish state, or submitting to the yoke of the Mosaic ritual or civil law. For the words of Solomon evidently suppose, that the stranger whom he describes as thus supplicating God, remained as he had originally been, * not of the people of Israel.' " From 2 Chron. ii. 17. it appears Solomon found in Israel strangers of such a rank of life as were fit to be employed in as- sisting to build the temple, 153,600. These (as the commenta- tors agree, vide Poli Synopsin, and Patrick.) were proselytes to the worship of the true God, and the observance of the moral law, though not circumcised. Patrick observes, * These were the relics (as Kimchi thinks) of the Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Hivites, and Jebusites, mentioned afterwards chap. viii. 7. But they were not idolaters, for then David would not have suffered them to dwell in the land. But they worshipped God alone, though they did not embrace the Jewish religion wholly, by being circumcised. These David had numbered, that he might know their strength and their condition, which did not proceed from such vanity as moved him to number his own people ; but out of a prudent care that they might be distinguished from Jews, and be employed in such work as he did not think fit to put upon the Israelites. The institution of the Mosaic law which admitted the Gen- tile proselytes into a part of the temple called from this circum- stance the court of the Gentiles, may be adduced as another conclusive argument to prove the truth of this proposition. They were admitted to shew that they had not been forsaken by their merciful Creator, but that all those who would forsake idolatry, should be taken into covenant with him as well as the Jews. The constant predictions of their prophets of the eventual reception of the Gentiles, ought to have removed the strong prejudices and objections of the Jews on this subject. (rt) Prideaux Connection, vol. iii. p. 436. (6) Preface to the Miscell. Sac. p. xiv. &c. (c) Lardner's Works, Hamilton's Ifo. edition, p. 393. 122 THE DEVOUT GENTILES Julian Pe- of the day, an angel of God coming in to him, and say- Joppaand riod, 4753. ing unto liim, Cornehus. Ca^sarea. ^hllt'-w.'^' ^ ^"^ ^'^^^ ^^^ looked on him, he was afraid, and said, What is it, Lord? And he said unto him, Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God. 5 And now send men to Joppa, and call for one Simon, whose surname is Peter : 6 He lodgeth with one Simon a tanner, whose house is (d) Ant. 1. 14. vii. ap. Lardner, vol. v. p. .501. (e) ^otovfievoi scil. akGof-UvoL Tov Qtov vocabantur proseljti porta;, v. 13. 16. 26.43, &c. &c. Kuinoel Comment, in lib. N. T.Hist. vol. iv. p. 359. He quotes also the passage from Micbaelis, mentioned below, vol. iii. Art. clxxxiv. of Smith's English translation. It may be proper here to set before the reader, atone view, the various names given in the Scripture History to those Gentiles whom the Jews had turned from idols to worship the true God. dvoosQ tvXa€itg^ ii. 5. irpoarjXvToi, ii. 10. Proselytes. This name was given also to those Gentiles vvho received circumcision, and who were Jews in every respect, except in their descent. dvdpeQ tvcTstflg, x. 2. 7. 4. Quamvis Juda;i (says Schoetgen;) de proselytis non tarn bene sentirent, prout ex scriptis eorundum hinc inde constat Deus tamen eosden, charos habuit et pra^clara sa pe de iisdem testatus est. Katio ejus rei est. quod Israelita; multa et maxima miracula Dei yiderant. et tamen hdem ipsis habere nolebant: proselvti contra, qui ipsi miraculorum d.vinorum testes non erant, et eis tamen "fidem adhibere non Uetrectaruut. Hmc ilia nomina quibus in his actis insigniuutur • dicuntur enim evXaQelg, c. ii. 5. viii. 2. aeUixepoi ; c.xiii. 43.50. xvi. 14 ohovixtvoi TOV Btor, b. X. 2. xii. 16. 26. Ipsi tamen Juda^i noununquam claro veritatis lumine convicti veritatem quoque ductu sacrarum littera- rum confessi sunt : quorum pertinet locus in Bammidbar Rabba, sect, viii fol. 196. 4. ast verba Psalm cxlvi. 9. Dominus custodit peregrinos : ftlultus est Deus in custodia ipsorum ne a se recedant. Grati Deo sunt proselyti nam Scriptura eosdem sa^penumero Israelitis a;quiparat, q. d. Jesa41.8. Et vos Israel servus meuset Jacob, &o. De Israelitis dici- tur, (|uo(l Deus illos amet Malach. i. 2. Dilexi vos, dicit dominus : idem de proselytis, Deuter. x. 18. Et amat proselytum, ut det ipsi panem et v.'hhs. (»2 Vol. X. p. 155. sect. 14. (5) Graves on the Pentateuch, vol. I. p. 237. ARE RECEIVED INTO THE CHURCH—CHAP. X. 123 Julian Pe- bv the sea-side : he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to Joppa and riod, 4T53. ^q^ Cassarea. abour4o/^' 7 And when the angel which spake unto Cornelius was departed, he called two of his household servants, and a devout soldier of them that waited on him continually ; 8 And when he had declared all these things unto them, he sent them to Joppa. 9 On the morrow, as they went on their journey, and drew nigh unto the city, Peter went up upon the house- top to pray, about the sixth hour : 10 And he became very hungry, and would have eaten : but while they made ready, he fell into a trance ^ 2 In that admirable collection of tracts which compose the thirteenth volume of the Critici Sacri, the reader will find a dissertation on the vision of St. Peter by Bernard Duysing. The whole of this discussion is well worthy of perusal. After examining many critical points, he gives the following explana- tion of the principal circumstances of the apostle's vision. The word cKtvog, vessel, which corresponds with the Hebrew "bz, denotes every kind of vessel, and it is interpreted therefore by the word 606j/>;, sheet, or any thing woven from flax. Ca- raerarius would render the werd odovr} by Mappa, a table nap- kin— Daniel Heinsius, by a shepherd's bag, or sack, in which they were accustomed to put food, platters, or trenchers, and other things. The sheet was full of four-footed and wild beasts, creeping things, or reptiles, and fowls of the air. Duysing is of opinion that every thing which is included in these various descrip- tions, were nnclean : and he strongly objects to the opinion of Hammond, that the clean and the unclean Avere here blended together. St. Peter was commanded from the animals before him to slay, and sacrifice and eat. If they had been mingled to- gether, as Hammond supposes, the apostle might have selected a proper victim, and his answer would not have been correct. If it be said the clean animals were rendered unclean by con- tact, the Levitical law (Lev. xi.) teaches us that it was the dead body, and not the living body, that rendered unclean what was otherwise pure. The whole object of the vision was to en- force on the mind of the apostle a new doctrine, which related to the Gentiles only, and not the Jews and Gentiles toge- ther. It was a type of the Christian Church, separated from the world, which included every kind of people. It was bound at the four corners, signifying that the whole world should be received into the universal Church of Chrislj and it corresponded with the four horns of the altar, and the oxen that supported the brazen sea, which were turned to the four quarters of the heavens. It was not without design that the sheet descended from hea- ven, in the same manner, as the new Jerusalem is represented in the Apocalypse. The Church, though it exists in the world, is not of the world; it is of celestial origin. It is a kingdom which is opposed to the kingdoms of this world, which are uniformly described as wild beasts rising out of the earth, or out of the sea, aspiring to attain to heaven. Lik(> its remarkable type the lower of Babel, which inverts the n iluriil order of things, the 124 THE DEVOUT GENTILES, &c.— CHAP. X. Julian Pe- 1 1 And saw heaven opened, and a certain vessel de- Joppa and vllfjja^lra ^cending unto him, as it had been a great sheet, knit at Caesarea. about 40. ' the four corners, and let down to the earth : false Church has its foundation on earth, and in vain attempts to reach to heaven. For every one who considers the subject will acknowledge that the laws to be observed in the Church niust proceed from God, and ought not to be planned bv man under any plausible reason whatever. The drawing back of the sheet to heaven was desio-ned to teach us, that the Church which has its origin from heaven will return victorious thither. In this representation the con- dition of the believing Gentiles is described : they were now about to constitute one Church with the believing Jews and were to be made with them partakers of the heavenly inherit- ance. The vision of St. Peter is considered in the same manner bv Jones of Nayland. This act of grace, he observes, in the divine economy, was signified to St. Peter, by a new license to feed upon unelean beasts. Peter could not have entered the house ol Cornelius according to the Mosaic law, which he had always observed, because it commanded the Jews to keep themselves separate from heathens in their conversation ; as in their diet they abstained from unclean beasts. But when God had mercy upon all, and the Jew and Gentile became one fold in Christ Jesus, then this distinction was set aside. Mr. Jones thus ex- plains the vision :— The living creatures of all kinds which were presented to St. Peter, were the people of all nations ; the linen sheet which contained them, signified their sanctification by the trospel ; and it was knit at four corners, to shew that they were gathered together from the four quarters of the world, and brought into the Church. He further observes-The heathens were taken into the Church on condition that they should put ** » n^Ti^^.^^^^ manners, as the unclean creatures had before put oil their natures, and became tame, when they were admit- ted into the ark of Noah, a figare of the Church. This change was again to happen under the Gospel ; and the prophet fore- tells the conversion of the heathens under the figure of a mira- culous reformation of manners in wild beasts. See Isaiah xi 6 1 he moral or spirit of this law is as much in force as ever Commentators generally translate the words Oycrov Kai d>dya, (V. 13.) sacrifice and eat, rather than kill and cat. Adam Clarke observes—Though this verb is sometimes used to siffuifv the s aying of animals for food, yet, as the proper notion is to May for the purpose of sacrifice, it appears to be better to pre- serve that meaning hero. Animals that were oflered in sacrifice were considered as given to God: and when he received the lile, the flesh was given to those who offered the sacrifice, that they might feed upon it: and every sacrifice had in it the nature ol a covenant, and covenants were usually made by eatinff toffe- ther on the flesh of the sacrifice off^ered on the occasion: God being s^upposed to be invisibly present with them, and partakinc Ol the foast. The spirit of the heavenly direction seems to be Ji'is : The middle wall of partition is now to be pulled down ; inc Jews and Gentiles are called to become one flock, under one Shepherd and bishop of souls. Thou, Peter, shalt open the door oi laith to the Gentiles, and be also the minister of the circum- ciNion. Hise up ; already a blessed sacrifice is prepared : ro -nd ofler it to God, and let thy soul feed on the fruits of his PETER VISITS CORNELIUS— CHAP. X. 125 Julian Pe- 12 Wherein were all manner of four-footed ^^^sts of J^opp^a^ajid riod, 4753. the earth, and wild beasts, and creeping things, and fowls about 40. ol the air. 13 And there came a voice to him, Kise, 1 eter ; kill, and eat. 14 But Peter said. Not so, Lord ; for I have never eaten any thing that is common or unclean. 15 And the voice spake unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common 16 This was done thrice: and the vessel was received up again into heaven. SECTION II. St, Peter visits Cornelius, a Roman Centurion, ACTSx. 17—33. 17 Now while Peter doubted in himself what this Caesarea. vision which he had seen should mean, behold, the men which were sent from Cornelius had made inquiry for Simon's house, and stood before the gate, 1 8 And called, and asked, whether Simon, which was surnamed Peter, were lodging there. 19 While Peter thought on the vision, the Spirit said unto him. Behold, three men seek thee. 20 Arise therefore, and get thee down, and go with them, doubting nothing : for I have sent them. 21 Then Peter went down to the men which were sent unto him from Cornehus ; and said. Behold, I am he whom ye seek : what is the cause wherefore ye have come ? 22 And they said, Cornelius the Centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Jews, was warned from God by an holy angel, to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee. 23 Then called he them in, and lodged them. And on • the morrow Peter went away with them, and certain bre- thren from Joppa accompanied him. 24 And the morrow after, they entered into Cesarea. mercy and goodness, in thus shewing his gracious design of saving both Jews and Gentiles by Christ crucified." Duysingthus defines the trance or extasy which St. Peter fell into. Per tKaraaiv, secundum II. Stephanum ah mffrafiai dic- tam, intelligamus mentis quasi dimoliouem ex statu suo natu- rali, per quern animoi cum corpore commerciuni, sensuuraqne usus ad tempus itasuspenditur, ut Homoillorum ope nihil extra se positum percipere possit, sed tola uicnte in imagines intus objectas convertatur.— See Critiei Sacri, vol. xiii. p. 610—620. .Tones' Works, vol. iii. p. 44, 4o. Clarke in loc. 126 CHRIST THE SAVIOUR OP ALL MEN—CHAP. X. ^•"d^"47^t A^^ Cornelias waited for them, and had called together Cicsarea. Vul 'ar.Era ^'^ kinsmen and near friends. about 40. ' 25 And as Peter was coming in, Cornelius met him, and fell down at his feet, and worshipped him. 26 But Peter took him up, saying. Stand up ; I myself also am a man. 27 And as he talked with him, he went in, and found many that were come together. 28 And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation ; but God hath shew- ed me that I should not call any man common or un- clean. 29 Therefore came I u?ito you without gainsaying, as soon as I was sent for. I ask, therefore, for what intent ye have sent for me ? 30 And Cornelius said, Four days ago I was fasting, until this hour : and at the ninth hour I prayed in my house ; and, behold, a man stood before me in bright clothing. 31 And said, Cornelius, thy prayer is heard, and thine alms are had in remembrance in the sight of God. 32 Send therefore to Joppa, and call hither Simon, whose surname is Peter : he is lodged in the house of one Simon a tanner,, by the sea side : who, when he cometh, shall speak unto thee. 33 Immediately therefore I sent to thee: and thou hast well done that thou art come. Now therefore are we all here present before God, to hear all things that are commanded thee of God. SECTION III. St. Peter first declares Christ to be the Saviour of all, even of the Gentiles who believe in him. ACTS X. 34 — 43. 34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons : 35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and work- eth righteousness, is accepted with him ^ There is no name given under heaven, by which men can be saved, but the name ol" Jesus Christ. This is the truth which has been confirmed by miracles, prophec}-, and other most in- controvertible evidence. So amply has this truth been demon- strated, that no speculations, or theories of our reason which clash with it, can be received; however plausible, the arguments on which they may rest. Without this belief our religion is de- graded into a fine system of moralitv, and one halfolthc Scrip- ture IS useless and unmeaning-. Jalian Pe riod,4753, CHRIST THE SAVIOUR OF ALL MEN— CHAP. X. 127 36 The word which God sent unto the children ofC^sarea. ll^^S Some Freethinkers have grafted a dangerous error upon tb,s about 40. ^«°^^ ^f gt. Peter to Cornelius. Rejecting the Gospel Snsation, they endeavour to undervalue or exclude Chris- tt?iWmaintainfng, that to fear God, and to work nghteo..- tianity, maintaining, tuai iw v^a.^ ^ — , ■ --- o ness are the only duties essentially necessary to salvation ; and that' these were as " old as the creation," inculcated by natural reHgiot and adopted by the Patriarchal, Heb. xi. 6. Job xix. 25 and bv the Mosaical, Matt. xxu. 40. , .- f TWsmaybe refuted, and it should seem fully and satisfac- ^''V'^Bv the case of Cornelius himself, who, though he possessed these requisites, was further, by a special revelation, required to ^t^BTtheTenerll'commission to the apostles to publish the GospeUhroughout the whole world, upon the further terms of faith and baptism in the name of the Trinity. ,• x„ 3 Upon both accounts therefore Peter required Cornelius to be baptized or admitted into the Christian Church, and entitled thereby to its higher benefits and privileges. 4 PauUVas clearly stated the higher privileges of Jews above the Gentiles, and of Christians above both, in his doctrinal epis- ties to the Romans and to the Hebrews. ^ Natural relio-ion, if opposed to revealed, is a mere fiction of fait Sii o onhy. " That -the world by human wisdom knew not God 5^^^ alS asserted by St. Paul, in his address to the phi- losophers of Greece. Such knowledge being too wonderful and Sent fir the attainment of mankind, b^ the confession of the patriarchs and prophets, (Job x..7. xxxvii. 23. Psa. cxxxix. 6 ^ and of the wisest of the heathen philosophers. 6 The Patriarchal and Mosaical dispensations were only schoolmasters to the Christian, designed to train the world gra- dualWfor its reception in the fulness of time; as subordinate parts of one grand scheme of redemption, embracing al man- Cd,?L?itut^ed at the creation, Gen. iii. 15. and gradually un- foldiiff to the end of the world, John in. 16. Rev. i. 18. It must, however, be acknowledged, that in heir zea to de- fend This essential article of the Chnstian la.th that there is but one name under heaven, by which man can be saved many have considered the inference unavoidable ; that if none can be saved but by the atonement of Christ, all who are ignorant of thit atonement cannot hope for salvation ; and consequentlj unbaptized infants and heathens are alike condemned to ever- ^?.^?rr be difficult to prove that this . " ^^her, and there die, or whether they are actually born, and then die, 128 CHRIST THE SAVIOUR OF ALL MEN-CHAP. X. Julian Pe- Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ, (he is Lord ofCoesarea. riod.4753. ^jj a Vulgar/lira, ^ about 40. — — — shall be punished with the unending torment of eternal tire: because, although they do not actually commit sin, yet they bring upon themselves the condemnation of original sin by the mere circumstance of their birth." When the king of the Frisons was on the point of receiving baptism, he was so shocked at the assertion of the zealous bishop, who declared that all his ancestors were in hell, that he withdrew his foot from the font, and never became a Christian. Tillemont, in his History of the Emperors, says the learned Jortin, (see his remarks on Ecc. History) takes all opportunities of inculcating the dreadful doctrine, that the best of the Pagans are condemned to suffer eternal tortures. Speaking of young Tiberius, who was murdered by order of the Emperor Caius, and compelled by the soldiers to thrust a sword into his own body, he concludes the melancholy tale with this reflection : "Thus by his own hand he ended his miserable life, to begin another, the misery of which will never end." The unhappy youth, (says Jortin) was then but nineteen years of age, and had probably never heard Christianity even mentioned. So zealous are the best writers of the Romish Church to enforce this point, that the Benedictine editors of Justin Martyr labour very hard to justify the good man, from the crime of believing in the pos- sible salvation of Socrates, and the virtuous heathen. Bellar- raine even rejects a book of St. Augustine from the catalogue of works imputed to that father, because the author has the im- piety to believe, that the souls of the children who were de- stroyed in the burning of Sodom and Gomorrha were not sent to hell with their parents. I could quote Perkins, the celebrated Calvinistic writer, who talks of reprobate infants ; that is, infants who are damned, I shudder to say, as if for the amusement of the Deity : Calvin, too, (b. iii. chap. 22.) has some sentiments on reprobation, which have excited much prejudice against Christianity. Many others might be quoted, but instances of the adoption of such opinions must be familiar to all who have read or conversed much on such topics. I seem to be defending the honour of God our Saviour from a foul and scandalous libel, M'hen I attempt to investigate this subject. Though I would not permit the conclusions of my reason to clash for one moment with the truths of Scripture, I think, on a careful survey of the doctrine of revelation, the eternal damnation of innumerable millions of mankind, for involuntary misfortune and ignorance, is not rerealed in Scripture. None, it is most true, can be admitted into that state of happi- ness, which is represented in Scripture as the abode of the pa- triarchs, the prophets, and the martyrs, but the Church of God, whicli is taken into covenant with him by the administra- tion of the sacraments, obedience, repentance, and faith. The world itself is but preserved in existence till the Church of God bo completed, and the top-stone of the building raised. From the promise in Eden, till the sounding of the archangel's trumpet. Omnipotence has been building up the Catholic Church, which shall one day be presented, without spot or blemish, to the Father. This Church is reserved for a happi- uess whiih the most virtuous among the heathen could not ap- preciate ; it would not, it could not, be suitable to their temper CHRIST THE SAVIOUR OF ALL MEN—f HAP. X. \2<) Julian Pe- and liabits of mind. Eye Imtli not seen, nor tlio imagination CoesaveH. riod, 4753. conjectured, what the divine wisdom and benevolence has pre- Vulgar^ra, pared for his elect Church. We shall not know it, till we be about 40. admitted by his mercy amonj^ the number. But are we required to believe, because the Church of God is thus admitted to the highest ylory, that the rest of the world will be therefore consigned to everlasting agony ? Arc there no gradations of knowledge, none of virtue? none of hap- " piness ? We know it was the custom of our Saviour to derive his lessons from surrounding objects: is it improba- ble, that when he assured his disciples, " in my Father's house arc many mansions," that the temple might be in vi(;w from the room in which they were then partaking of the last supper ? The temple has ever been considered a type both of the Christian Church and of heaven. As in tlu? temple there was the court of the Gentiles, the apartments of the Lcvites, the Nazarites, and the Priests; the division where Jews alone might go ; the hall of the Sanhedrim, and the Holy of Holies : so in the great temple of God are there many mansions for all divisions of the great family of mankind, excepting those who wilfully exclude themselves from the proffered benelit. There, in the heaven of glory, will be the Holy of Holies, into which, by the mercy of God, every Christian may enter; there also may be the court of the Gentiles, where the virtuous heathen may rejoice in the Providence which preserves them in every stage of their being. Arguments may undoubtedly be found against this hypothesis : but I see no reason for believing, that the God of all flesh will consign unoffending infants, ignorant and half savage men, without a wilful crime, or an intention to offend him, to misery without end. This is not the doctrine of Scripture. If it be said, that infants have been destroyed by the sword, or swal- lowed by earthquakes, or drowned' in the deluge ; it is most true: — but there is an essential difference between the decree which inflicts, for wise purposes, a momentary pain, and that which condemns the sufferer to endless and dreadful agony. Arguments might be deduced, from the inequalities of the present life, the nature of man, and other sources, but it is not necessary. The diflerence between the heathen and the Chris- tian must, and will be, eternal and infinite; but it does not from thence follow that the heathen witl be unavoidably miser- able. In every nation, he that feareth God and worketh righte- ousness, is accepted. Though no man will be saved by the sect to which he belongs, he may be saved by the mercy of God through the merits and atonement of his Son, in that sect. I shall merely consider an objection, which will be urgod, " if the heathen can be delivered from eternal misery, without (Jhris- lianity, why should Christians, of every description, be so anxious to convert them?" Christ and his apostles desired the conversion of the whole world, for two reasons, which will ever possess considerable in- fluence with all their followers: Christianity promotes the tem- poral, and secures the future happiness of mankind; it recon- ciles both worlds, and gives permanent felicity on earth and in heaven, in a degree infinitely higher than could have been other- wise obtained. It secures their present happiness, or wonderfully increases it. The very leaves of this tree of life are for the healing of the nations. Christianity promotes the refinement, the civiliza- tion, and the morality of the world. Even where it does not sufliciently influence the motives of conduct, it produces exter- YOL. II. K 130 CHRIST THE SAVIOUR OF ALL MEN— CHAP. X. Julian Pe- 37 Thatvvord*, I say, ye know, which Hvas published Cffisarea. riod,4753. . about 40.' ' nal decorum, by abolishing at once the cruelties, the impurities, the abominations of heathenism. Like the sun rising on the world, it has banished the mists of ignorance and superstition ; it has been the sole preserver of learning and knowledge, and the consequent restorer of science and true philosophy. Public liberty is protected and assisted, by the lessons it en- forces, both to monarchs and their people. It has diminished the horrors of war ; civilized the most barbarous nations; sup- pressed polygamy, licentious divorces, and many cruel customs. It has not entirely done away slavery, but it has ameliorated the condition of the slave, and will undoubtedly remove it alto- gether. Christianity has refined the laws of nations ; and though much remains to be done, the light shines upon the world; and it will continue, we are confidently assured by prophecy, till the whole race of man rejoice in its meridian glory. To the Hindoo, the Polynesian, and the savage, wherever they may be found, it is our duty to distribute the temporal blessings of Christianity, on the same principle of benevolence which would induce us to give our bread to the hungry. Much more is it our duty to consider, with the Founder of our religion and his immediate disciples, the spiritual necessities of our ignorant and uncivilized brethren. By our means they may be admitted to that highest state of happiness, worthy of their rank in the dominions of God. Many arguments in favour of the opinion of the probability of the non-condemnation of the virtuous heathen might be ad- duced from several passages of Scripture, chiefly from the rea- soning of St. Paul in the second chapter of his Epistle to the Romans, and the declaration of St. Peter to Cornelius. Many testimonies might be selected from Origen, Justin Martyr, Cle- mens Alexandrinus, and others. Though of the latter autho- rity, it is but right to observe, he has grounded his opinion on a mistaken interpretation of the celebrated text in St. Peter's general Epistle : " By which he went and preached to the spirits in prison." A text, of which Calvin is now generally supposed to have given the best explanation. Bishop Horsley's opinions on that subject being esteemed rather curious than probable. .'\ r? j " The construction of this passage is difficult, and it has con-* / sequently exercised the ingenuity of the commentators. T6v Xoyov ov aTrereike roTg viotg lapaijX, are the words. Some suppose the accusative is here put for the nominative; others that there is an ellipse of the preposition Kara.. Eras- mus and Schmidius would connect rbv \6yov with o'iSarf in the next verse, and read {ovtoq t). Erasmus (r) considers the word x^rniariaai to be used for ovofid^taOai, as do also the other writers in the Critici Sacri. See, however, the references and remarks of Woltius (d). Vitringa(e) endeavours to prove, from ibis passage, that the word " Church " here refers to the place M-herc a congregation of Christians assembled for worship ; or, rather, to that body of people which could assemble in one place. This is but one, out of many instances, in which thi^ learned writer, in his zeal against episcopacy, has proved nothing, by atttmptingto prove loo mucii. We are not acquainted M'ith the numbers of the Church at Antioch ; but we know that at Jerusalem the thou- sands of converts could not be assembled in one place, yet they arc still called the Church. IMPRISONMENT OF ST. PETER— CHAP. X. 135 Julian Pe- SECTION IX. Antioch. VulgariEr'a HcTod Agrippa Condemns James the Brother of John to 43. Deathj and Imprisons Peter, who is miraculously re- leased, and presents himself to the other James, who had been made Bishop of Jerusalem ^ The Codex Beza supposes that the name was given by Saul and Barnabas, and renders the 2oth and 26th verses thus : And hearing that Saul Mas at Tarsus, he departed, seeking for him ; and having found him, he besought him to come to Antioch ; vi'ho, when they were come, assembled with the Church a whole year, and instructed a great number ; and there they first called the disciples at Antioch Christians. The word xp^l^cLToai, in our common text, which we trans- late " were called," signifies, in the New Testament, to ap- point, warn, or nominate, by divine direction. In this sense the word is used, Matt. ii. 12. Luke ii. 26. and in the preced- ing chapter of this book, ver. 22. If, therefore, the name was giv.en by divine appointment, it is most likely that Saul and Barnabas were directed to give it -, and the name Christian, therefore, is from God, as well as that grace and holiness which are so essentially required and implied in the character. Be- fore this time, the Jewish converts were simply called, among themselves, disciples, i. e. scholars, believers, saints, the church, or assembly : and by their enemies Nazarenes, Galileans, the men of this way, or sect ; and by other names, which are given by Bingham (/). / (a) Benson's planting of Christianity, 2d edit. p. 248, note, {b) Me- letem. Leidensia De vita Pauli, cap. 3. sect. 5. p. 39. (c) Ap.CriticiSacri, vol. viii. p. 219. (cf) Wolfius Cuiai Philologicae, \o\, ii. p. 1166. (e) See his discussion De Synag. veteri, lib. i. pars. 1. cap. 3. p. 113, &c. (/) Bingham's Eccles. Autiq. vol. i. book 1. Dr. A. Clarke in loc. 9 The situation of the Church at Jerusalem was greatly altered by the Herodian persecution. It had hitherto been directed and governed by the joint council of the apostles. But, after that event, we learn, from ecclesiastical history, that the super- intendence of the Church was confided to James, the Lord's brother. It asserts that he was the first bishop of Jerusalem. The catalogues of the bishops of Jerusalem, which are extant in the early Christian writers, all place James at their head. In the first chapters of the Acts, St. Peter is constantly spoken of as the chief apostle, and the principal person in the Church of Jerusalem ; l^ut from the twelfth chapter of that book, which is the first place wherein James is mentioned with any character of distinction, he is constantly described as the chief person at Jerusalem, even when Peter was present. For when St. Peter was delivered by the angel out of prison, he bid some of the disciples go shew these things, that is, what had befallen himself, to St. James, as the head of the Church ; and to the bre- thren,that is, the rest of the Church. Again, when St. Paul arriv- ed at Jerusalem from his travels in preaching the Gospel to foreign countries, l)eing desirous to give an account of the success which God had given him, the day following he went in to St. James, as the bishop of that place, and all the ciders, who were next in authority to him, were present. In the synod which was held at Jerusalem, about the great question, Whether the converts from Gentilism should be circumcised, Si. Peter delivers his judgment as one who was a member of tlic assembly: linL St. James speaks with authority, and his sentence is decisive. , ThenJime of James is placed by St. Paul before Peter and John : 136 THE HERODIAN PERSECUTION—CIIAP. X. Julian J'f- ACTS xii. 1 — 18. and part of ver. 19. riod, 47ovalion of the apos- lle in th(> pnssn-rc before us. St. Peter directs his friends to go and tt^ll Janus of his deliverance : James, according lo the best and most L;,rncr;>lly received opinion, decided in the apostolic THE DEATH OF JAMES—CHAP. X. 137 Julian Pe- 2 And he killed James the brother of John with the Antioch, riod,4756. gword. VujgariEra, 43. : council, when St. Paul went up to Jerusalem (Acts xxi. 17, 18.) the brethren received him gladly, and the next day he went iu unto James, all the elders bein^ present. " For what other reason," says the admirable and judicious Mr. Scott, " should Paul go in to James more especially, or upon what other account should all the elders be present with James, but that he was a person of the greatest note and figure in the Church of Jerusa- lem ; and as he is called an apostle, that he was peculiarly the apostle of that Church. This, from Scripture, is probable ; the unanimous testimony of the fathers of the Church in his opinion makes it certain; and it would be difficult to learn why this large class of men, whose honesty, piety, and freedom from any erroneous bias, is universally acknowledged, should have con- spired without any possible motive to deceive the world by use- less falsehood." The remarks of Mosheim on this point seem to be deficient in accuracy and judgment. He acknowledges that all ancient au- thorities, from the second century downwards, concur in repre- senting James the younger, the brother of our Lord after the flesh, as the first bishop of the Church of Jerusalem, havingbeen so created by the apostles themselves ; and quotes Acta Sanctor. Mens. Mail, tom. i. p. 23. Tillemont, Memoires pour servir a I'Historie de I'Eglise, tom. i. p. 1008, etseq. He then proceeds to observe, " if this were as truly, as it is uniformly reported, it would at once determine the point which we have under consi- deration, since it must close the door against all doubt as to the quarter in which episcopacy originated. But I rather suspect that these ancient writers might incautiously be led to form their judgment of the state of things in the first century, from the maxims and practice of their own times, and finding thai after the departure of the other apostles on their respective missions, the chief regulation and superintendance of the Church rested with James, they without further reason conclud- ed that he must have been appointed bishop of that Church. It appears indeed from the writings of the New Testament, that, after the departure of the other apostles on their travels, the chief authority in the Church of Jerusalem was possessed by James. For St. Paul, when he came to that city for the last time, immediately repaired to that apostle; and James appears thereupon to have convened an assembly of the Presbyters at his house, where Paul laid before them an account of the extent and success of his labours in the cause of his divine Master. (Acts xxi. 19, 20.) No one reading this can, I should think, entertain a doubt of James's having been at that time invested with the chief superintendance and government of the Church of Jerusalem, and that not only the assemblies of the Presbyters, but also those general ones of the whole Church, in which as is clear from ver. 22, was lodged the supreme power as to all mat- ters of a sacred nature, were convened by his appointment." But it must be observed, that this authority was no more than must have devolved on James of course, in his apostolic charac- ter, in consequence of all the other apostles having quitted Je- rusalem; and that therefore this testimony of St. Luke is by no means to be considered as conclusive evidence of his having been appointed to the office of bishop. Were we to admit of such kind of reasoning as this, the government of the Church of Jerusalem was vested in James, therefore ho was its bishop ; 1 do not sec on what grounds we could refuse our assent, should 138 IMPRISONMENT OF ST. PETER— CHAP. X. Julian Pe- 3 And because he saw it pleased the Jews, he pro- Antioch. riod, 4750. 43. ^ ' it be asserted that all the twelve apostles were bishops of that Church, for it was at one time equally under their government. But not to enlarge unnecessarily, the function of an apostle dif- fered widely from that of a bishop, and I therefore do not think that James, who was an apostle, was ever appointed to or dis- charged the episcopal office at Jerusalem. The government of the Church in that city, it rather appears to me, was placed in the hands of its Presbyters, but so as that nothing of moment could be done without the advice and authority of James ; the same sort of respectful deference being paid to his will as had formerly been manifested for that of the apostles at large. But although we deem those ancient writers to have committed an error, in pronouncing James to have been the first bishop of Jerusalem, it may without much difficulty be demonstrated that the Church of that city had a bishop sooner than any of the rest, and consequently that the episcopal dignity must have taken its rise there," &c. &c. If the unanimous testimony of Scripture and of the fathers can be set aside by such reasoning, which assumes as a postulate, that the witnesses are all in error, there remains no other guide to direct us in theological research, than our own caprice or imagination. Whitby, Cave, Lardner, and others, have asserted that James, the Lord's brother, was truly and strictly an apostle, being the same as James, the son of Alpheus, one of the twelve. Bishop Taylor, and I believe the great majority of the Protestant as well as Romanist divines, relying on the authority of Eusebius, consider him to have been a different person, and to have been elected bishop of Jerusalem, with the title of apostle. Dr. Lardner's reasoning on the question whether St. James, the Lord's brother, was the same as James, the son of Alpheus, one of the twelve, has left the point doubtful. Jerome calls this James the thirteenth apostle. The judicious Hooker was of opinion that the apostles were dispersed from Judea about this time, and that James was now elected bishop or permanent apostle of Jerusalem. He would attribute the public setting apart of St. Paul to the apostolic office, to make up again the number of the twelve, for the gather- ing in of the nations abroad. He supposes too that Barnabas was appointed apostle instead of St. James, who was killed by Herod ; and Dr. Hales has approved the supposition. It is curious to observe that Dr. Lardner calls James the pre- sident, or superintendent, carefully avoiding the word bishop: and in another passage (vol. i, pi 293,) he observes, "James • abode in Jerusalem, as the apostle residentiary of that country." If he was president and apostle residentiary in Jerusalem, as the superintendent of the Church, which now consisted of many thousands and myriads of converts, it is dilKcult to imagine the reason why this learned anti-episcopalian should not have adopt- ed the appellation of the fathers, and have called him bishop of the Church at Jerusalem. This, however, is by no means the only instance of disingenuousncss on these subjects, on the j.art of Dr. Lardner. Neither was his amiable coadjutor, Dr. Dod- dridge, entirely free from censure in his mode of treating the questions of Church government. (ft) Sec thj? references, and quotations in Scott's Christian Life, folio edition, p. 475, cliap. vii. part ii. a work once liia^hly popular, for tlie sinj^ular union of fervent piety,- sober judj:cment, extensive reading, and good pnuciples.— Arcbbisliop Potter's Church Government, p. 91.— IMPRISONMENT OF ST. PETER— CHAP. X. I39 Julian Pe- ceeded further to take Peter also. Then were the days Antioch. riod, 4756. ^f unleavened bread. v^uJgar/jLra, ^ ^^^ ^^^^ ^^ j^^^ apprehended him, he put km in prison, and delivered him to four quaternions of soldiers to keep him ; intending after Easter to bring him forth to the people. 5 Peter therefore was kept in prison : but prayer was made without ceasing of the church unto God for him. 6 And when Herod would have brought him forth, the same night Peter was sleeping between soldiers, bound with two chains : and the keepers before the door kept the prison. . 7 And behold the angel '" of the Lord came upon htm, Mosheim on the affairs of the Christians before Constantine, vol. i. p. 229, 230.— Lardner's supplement to the Credibility, Works, 4to. vol. ui. p. 382. 393.— Hooker's Ecclesiastical Polity, book vu. sect. iv. p. 34b. tolio edition of 1723.— Hale's Anal. vol. ii. part u. 10 The German commentators, of the self-named liberal class, endeavour to explain away every miracle recorded in the New Testament, by represent! nj^- them as natural events, which have only been considered as miraculousby the misapprehending ot the hebraisms of the inspired writers. I have not^hought it worth while to stop in my way through the New Testament paradise, to pick up these poisonous weeds. They are unknown to the English reader in general, and I trust will long remain so. The explanation, however, of Hezelius, which I find in Kuinoel, is so singular, that it may appear doubtful whether in his eager-' nessto remove the opinion of a miraculous interference by an an"-cl, he does not establish a still greater miracle. He thinks that a Hash of lightning penetrated the prison in the night, and melted the chains of St. Peter, without injuring him. Tlio apostle rose up, and saw the soldiers who guarded him struck prostrate on the ground, by the force of the lightning. He passed them, as if led by the flash of lightning, and escaped from the prison before he perceived that he had been liberated by the providence of God. The reader who will peruse the whole narrative, will have an equal respect with myself for the sound judgment and ingenuity of the learned author. So completely, however, has the sceptical philosophy of the day pervaded society, that even among professed Christians, he would now be esteemed a visionary, who should venture to declare his belief in the most favourite doctrine of the ancient Church. The early fathers regarded the ministry of angels as a consoling and beautiful doctrine, and so much at that time was it held in veneration, that the founders of Christianity cautioned tueir early converts against permitting their reverence to degenerate; into adoration. We now go to the opposite extreme, and sel- dom think of their existence ; yet what is to be found in this belief, even if the Scriptures had not revealed it, which is con- tr\rv to our reason ? We believe in our own existence, and in the existence of a God: is it utterly improbable, then, that be- tween us, who are so infcM'ior, and the Creator who is so won- derful and incomprehensible, iniiuite gradations of beings should exist, some of whom are employed in executing the will oi the Deity towards finite creatures? Docs not God act even by ^ human means in the visible government of the allairs of the earth? what absurdity, then, can be discovered m the opinion UO AN ANGEL DELIVERS ST. PETER— CHAP. X. Julian Pe- and a light shined in the prison : and he smote Peter on Antioch. riod, 4750. '=' - -_ Vnlgar^Era, that the spiritual nature of man should bejunder the guardian- 4^- ship of sp-ritual beings ? This, in fact, Mas a doctrine univer- sally received j till it became perverted and degraded by vain and idle speculations, till it became so encumbered with absur- dities, that the belief itself was rejected. Some writers on this subject went so far as to imagine they could ascertain the orders of a hierarchy, and could even assert the numbers in each rank. Others changed the office and ministry of angels, investing them with independent control over the works of God, an opinion strongly and jastly reprobated by the most eminent authori- ties (a). And because in the original Hebrew that which exe- cutes the will of the Deity is sometimes called an " angel," whe- ther it be winds or storms, fire or air ; many again have trans- formed the angels in the Old Testament into obedient elements, accomplishing the designs of Providence. According to which hypothesis, the aged patriarch must have prayed that the bless- ing of an element might descend on his grandchildren. The Mes- siah must have been created a little lower than the winds and the floods, who in like manner were commanded to worship him ; and again, when the superiority of Christ is declared, the passage must be rendered, to which of the elements said he at any time, Sit thou on my right hand, until I make thy foes thy footstool. Leaving all such fantastic and unreasonable interpre- tations out of the question, let us turn to that interpretation of Scripture on this point, which has been acknowledged by all classes and divisions of Christians, from the time of the apos- tles to the present day. From the evidence of revelation, we have grounds for believing that angels are spirits,superior to mankind, some of whom have lost, while others have preserved the state of happiness in' which they were primarily created, and that these are now opposed to each other. Of the precise cause of the fall of the evil angels we are not made acquainted. We know only that they retain the remembrance of their original condition ; that they are powerful, though under restraint ; that gradations of superiority and influence exist among them; that they acknowledge a superior head, and that they are des- tined to iuture punishment after some wonderful andmiraculous display of the omniscience of the Deity. Of the good angels we learn, that they continue in their primeval dignity. They are endued with great power, and because they arc employed in the constant execution of the decrees of Provi- dence, they have received the name of messengers or angels. They are called the armies and the hosts of heaven ; in innumer- able companies they surround the throne of Deity ; they are made partakers of his glory, and rejoice to fulfil his will. Their ofiice as ministering angels to the sincere and accepted worshippers of our common God is more fully and accurately related. Through the whole volume of revelation we read of the agency of superior beings in theaflairsof mankind. They were stationed at the tree of life in Paradise. In Jacob's vision of the ladder, they are represented as ascending and descending upon eartii. They appeared to the patriarchs, to Abraham, to Lot, to Jacob, and they were made alike the ministers both of the vengi^ance and mercy of God. They were intrusted with the destruction of the cities of the plain. And the angel of the Lord went out, and smote in the camp of Sennacherib an hun- dred and fourscore and five thousand. (2 Kings xix. 35.) God sent an angel unto Jerusalem to destroy it — who was seen be- tween the earth and the heaven having a drawn sword in his hand, blrclchcd out over Jerusalem. In the New Testament AN ANGEL DEUVEttS ST. PETER— CHAP. X. 141 ^•'^d*'475fl ^^^ ^^^^' ^"^ raised him up, saying, Arise up quickly. Antioch. VulgariEr'a, ^^^ ^"^ chains tell off from his hands. 43. ' 8 And the angel said unto him, Gird thyself, and bind on tliy sandals : and so he did. And he saith unto him, Cast thy garment about thee, and follow me. 9 And he went out, and followed him ; and wist not that it was true which was done by the angel ; but thought he saw a vision. 10 When they were past the first and second ward, they came unto the ii'cm gate that leadeth unto the city, which opened to them of his own accord : and they went out, and passed on through one street : and forthwith the angel departed from him ". they announced the birth of Christ, and of his forerunner ; they became visible to the shepherds, and proclaimed the glad tid- ings of salvation to the senseless world. They are interested for, and sympatliize with man ; for there is joy in heaven over one sinner that repenteth. They were the watchful and anxi- ous attendants of Christ in his human nature. They ministered to him after his triumph in the wilderness, and his agony in the garden. As they announced his birth, so also they proclaimed his resurrection, his ascension, and his future return to judg- ment. They were made the spiritual means of communication between God and man. They were the divine witnesses of the whole system of redemption. By an angel Joseph was warned to flee into Egypt. (Matt. ii. 1.3.) By an angel Cornelius was directed to the house of Peter. (Acts x. 6 — 22.) By an angel that apostle was released from prison. And by the ministry of an angel, were signified to St. John those things that should be hereafter. In this last and mysterious revelation the agency of superior beings is uniformly asserted, and they are repre- sented as fulfilling the most solemn and important decrees of Omnipotence. They are represented as standing on the four corners of the earth, as having the seal of the living God, as offering on the golden altar the incense and prayers of the saints, as holding the key of the bottomless pit, and as execut- ing the vengeance of God upon the visible creation, and upon all those who have not the seal of God upon their foreheads ; all which, though metaphorical expressions, imply the probable agency of these invisible beings, in the affairs of the world. And when time shall be no more, these holy beings who have sympathized with man here, and been the witnesses of his actions, and the infinite mercies of his Almighty Creator and Redeemer, will be the accusing or approving spectators of the sentence passed upon him in eternity ; for our Saviour has ex- pressly declared, that whosoever shall confess me before men, him shall the Son of Man also confess before tlie angels of God. But he that denieth me before men shall be denied before the angels of God. (a) See Horsley's Sermon on tiie Watchers, vol. ii. last sermon, and generally on this subject. — Hammond. — Wheatley. — Aquinas, who al- though there are some most strange absurdities in his ponderous tome, abounds with useful truths, &c. &c. »' Schoetgen has shewn that the ancient Jews believed the angels sometimes assumed the form of a man, and has collected some curious instances to this effect. The Gentiles, as well as the Jews, thought that the gods 142 AN ANGEL DELIVERS ST. PETER— CHAP. X. Julian Pe- 1 1 And when Peter was come to himself, he said, Antloch. v"?' ^^S^' ^^^^ I know of a surety that the Lord hath sent his angel, 43" S^*" ^^' and hath dehvered me out of the hand of Herod, and froin all the expectation of the people of the Jews. 12 And when he had considered the thing, he came to the house of Mary the mother of John, whose surname was Mark ; where many were gathered together, pray- ing. 13 And as Peter knocked at the door of the gate, a damsel came to hearken, named Rhoda. 14 And when she knew Peter's voice, she opened not the gate for gladness, but ran in, and told how Peter stood before the gate. 15 And they said unto her, Thou art mad. But she constantly affirmed that it was even so. Then said they. It is his angel. 1 6 But Peter continued knocking : and when they had opened the door, and saw him, they were astonished. 17 But he beckoning unto them with the hand, to hold their peace, declared unto them how the Lord had brought him out of the prison. And he said. Go, shew these things unto James, and to the brethren. And he depart- ed, and went into another place '^ sometimes assumed the appearance of any particular individual, and spake when thus disguised with the same tone b}^ which that individual would be recognized. This superstition is well described by Homer— 'AXXd Tloereidduv 'EicrcLfievoQ KdXxavTi ckfiaQ Kal aTSipka (pu)V7]v. II. V. 81. et Odyss. pa. 105. See also Schoetgen in loc '=^ We may be permitted to express our regret, that the evan- gelical narrative has not here given us the slightest allusion to the place where St. Peter secreted himself from his persecutors. The word in the original is of the most indefinite kind. Dr. Lardner is of opinion that it refers only to some one of the houses in Jerusalem, or an adjacent village or town, and that the apostle soon returned to the city upon the death of Herod Agrippa, which took place at the end of the year. Some com- mentators have been of opinion that he went to Antioch, others to Rome. Dr. Lardner observes, that there is no good founda- tion for either of these opinions. That there is any foundation for the former I am not prepared to say. The interview be- tween St. Peter and St. Paul at Antioch, which is mentioned Gal. ii. 11 — 16. occurred some time after this, and after the council at Jerusalem. That St. Peter took refuge at Rome appears to me the most probable. The silence of Scripture leaves us to the evidence of the fathers. With respect to this conclusion, that St. Peter went to Rome ; and the jealousy of protestants on this point, because the Romanists would establish upon this fact, the alleged su- premacy of St. Peter, Dr. Lardner justly remarks, it is not for our honour, or our interest, either as Christians or Pro- testants, to deny the truth of events, ascertained by early and well-attested tradition. If otliers make an ill use of facts, we AN ANGEL DELIVERS ST. PETER— CHAP. X. 143 Julian Pe- 18 Now as soon as it was day, there was no small stir Antioch. riod,4756. anions the soldiers, what was become of Peter. Vulgar^Era, ^ [ ^^' are not accountable for it. While it appears to me not impro- bable that he took refuge from the Herodian persecution with some of the friends of Cornelius, there is no evidence that he founded the Church at Rome, nor even addressed himself to the Gentiles in that city. He would have considered himself guilty of a violation of the law of God, if he had now done so. It was " with the utmost difficulty St. Peter could be convinced, even by a vision from above, that the kingdom of heaven was lo be open to the proselyted Gentiles ; much less can it be believed that he would preach at this period to the idolatrous citizens of Rome. The language of St. Paul, in his Epistle to the Romans, which was written many years after this time, sufficiently proves that no Church was founded at Rome till the visit of St. Paul to that city. The stay of St. Peter was probably very short, and con- tinued only during the persecution. The Church of Rome, says a learned prelate of our own day, was established as a Christian society, during St. PauPs first visit, by the communication of the spiritual gift, which he inti- mates. It is evident that no other of the apostles had any share in this first establishment but St. Paul • whatever may be said of St. Peter's episcopacy of twenty-five years. For' the epistle to the Romans appears to have been written not long before the apostle's first visit. And at that time his language to them certainly implies that no other apostle bad been there before him : " Yea, so have I strived to preach the Gospel, not where Christ was named, lest I should build upon another man's foundation (a)," (chap. xv. 20.) St. Peter had fulfilled the prediction of our Lord, that he should open the kingdom of heaven to the Gentiles, when he preached to Cornelius and his family. The Roman centurion had been now admitted into the Christian Church ; he was pro- bably one of those by whom prayer was made without ceasing for St. Peter's liberation, and we may justly conclude that he held this apostle in the highest veneration. Though Cornelius had not the power to release St. Peter from prison, (the Jews being very jealous of the interference of the Romans in all matters connected with religion,) it is not unlikely that more effectual protection could be aflorded by a Roman in a case of persecu- tion, than by any of the suflering Church. It is certain that the Romans had great influence at this time ; for we read that when Herod was enraged with the people of Tyre, their em- bassy made Blastus, the king's chamberlain, their friend. Blastus was a Roman. The Romans did not hesitate to engage in the service of the tributary kings, and sovereign dependent of the empire (6). It is not improbable, therefore, that the apostle, when he went to another place from the house of the mother of Mark, would take refuge among some of the Gentile converts ; and, as the indignation of Herod was so great, that he condemned the soldiers to death from whom Peter had escaped, it was but natural to apprehend that the apostle would soon be condemned to a similar fate. None of the Jews ^vould shelter him, as they took part with Herod, against the infant Church. Under these circumstances, it appears not unlikely that the Gentile con- verts would provide forhiseflectual safety, by sending him among some of their ovrn friends at Rome, who were cognizant in the real history of the extraordinary events that had taken place in Judea. The same evidence which induces me to come to this conclu- sion, compels me to believe also, that St. Peter took with him to Rome the writer of the second Gospel, which bears so much 144 ST. PETER LEAVES JERUSALEM— CHAP. X. Julian Pe- 19 And when Herod had sought for him, and found Antioch. riod, 475G. Vulgar^Era, "" ~ ~ ~ ^^- internal as well as CKternal evidence, that it was addressed to Roman converts. We read (Acts xii. 12.) that when St. Petcr went iVoin prison he proceeded to the house of Mary the mother of Mark. He staid there but a short time, and it is not, I think, improbable that St. Mark accompanied him, to aid hira in case of danger. It will, however, be necessary to examine the hypothesis of Dr. Lardner, on the other side of the question, that the apos- tles did not leave Judca till after the apostolic council. His first argument is derived from the fact that all the apos- tles were present at the council of Jerusalem : and he concludes that they could not have been to other countries before that time, from the total want of evidence on the subject. It may however be answered, that no argument can be de- rived from the silence of the inspired or Heathen writers. We acknowledge the apostles to have been present, in all probabi- lity, at the council of Jerusalem ; the question is, whether they did not leave Jerusalem between the years 44, when the He- rodian persecution was raging, and the year 49 or 50, when the council was held. Peter was well acquainted with the perse- cuting and cruel spirit of H^rod— he had seen James the brother of John killed with the sword— he was himself appre- hended and imprisoned, and while he remained in the city he continued exposed to the most imminent danger. Was it not, under these circumstances, more probable that the apostle should absent himself from Jerusalem during the reign of this monarch, and that he did not return to his own country till his death, when Jijdea was governed by the Roman procurators. Biscoe has well shewn, that the Heathens protected the Chris- tians in the exercise of their religion, against the fury of the Jews; and we read many things in the Acts of the Apostles which prove the same point. / Dr. Lardner then proceeds to observe, 1. " That it was fit and proper, and even expedient, that the apostles should stay a good while in Judea, to assert and confirm the truth of Christ's resurrection, by teaching, and by miraculous works, and do their utmost to bring the Jewish people to faith in Jesus as the Christ. 2. "As this was fit, it is likely that they had received some com- mand from Christ himself, or some direction from the Holy Ghost, to stay thus long in Judca. » 3. " There were considerations that would incline them to it, and induce them to do what was fit to be done, and was agree- able to the mind of Christ. One was the difiiculty of preach- ing the Gospel in foreign countries. This would induce them to stay in Judca, till the circumstances of things facilitated their farther progress, or called them to it. Another thing was their affection for the Jewish jjcople, their countrymen, espe- cially those of Judea, with whom they had been brought up, and among whom they dwelt, together with a persuasion of the great value of the blessing of the Gospel. " Tliis last consideration,! apprehend, would induce them to labour in Judea, with earnest desires, and some hoj)cs, of bringing all, or however many, to faith in Jesus. This infiu- enccil Paul also to a great degree, and for a good while. Nor was he without hopes of persuading his brethren and country- nun to what appeared to himself very certain and very evident. So he says in his speech to tiie people at Jerusalem, Acts xxii. J7 — 20. He assures them, that whilst he was worshipping at THE KEEPERS ARE PUT TO DEATH-CIIAP. X. 145 Julian Pe- him not, he examined the keepers, and commanded tliat Jerusalem ^ Vuf 'atSr* ^^^^y ^^^^^^^ ^^ P^^ ^^ death. about 43. ' ~~ Jerusalem, in the temple, he had a trance, or extasy : that he there saw Christ, who said to him. Make haste, and get thee quickly out of Jerusalem, for they will not receive thy testi- mony concerning- me. Paul pleaded, that they must needs pay a regard to his testimony, who was well known to have been for some while very zealous in opposing his followers, and was now convinced and persuaded. But the Lord said unto him. Depart, for I will send thee far hence unto the Gentiles. This trance, or vision, seems to have happened in the year 44, after that Paul had preached at Antioch with great success among the Gentiles. Nevertheless, he had an earnest desire to make on3 attempt more among the Jews of Judea, where was the body of that people ; and if they could have been persuaded, many abroad would follow their example. And it required an express and repeated order from Jesus Christ, in vision, to induce him to lay aside that design, and to proceed to preach to the Gen- tiles in remote parts." To all which it may be replied, 1st. That the apostles had now continued in Jerusalem till a Christian Churchvvas esta- blished—the Gospel had been preached to the Jews, and con- firmed by miracle, and the most undeniable evidence ; but the Jews persisted in the rejection of their Messiah. 2. To the second, the command of Christ to his apostles to continue at Jerusalem is not recorded : and even had it been given, it would prove only that the appointed time had expired. 3. The Herodian persecution prevented the apostles from following their own plans ; and the Jews themselves, by their unrelenting bitterness, took away from them the power of ac- complishing their first great object, that of offering salvation to and converting, their own countrjmen, and their very lives de- pended upon flight. They could find no difficulty in preaching the Gospel to other countries, because they were endued with the gift of tongues for this express purpose; in addition to which, they would have been admitted into the Jewish syna- gogues in every country. The conversion of Cornelius proves that the predicted time for the admission of the Gentiles had arrived; the Church was established, and the Jews had beheld the apostolic miracles • they had been appealed to in vain, and there was now no neces- sity for the longer continuance of the apostles at Jerusalem, who were consequently instructed by a vision, that the time had come when they were to preach to the Gentiles. Dr. Lardner's last argument is quite extraordinar3\ H*^ 're- lieves that the apostles were under no necessity of leaving Je- rusalem during the Herodian persecution, because they were under miraculous protection. He forgets that James, one of the twelve, had been killed already : and it seems to me, that St. Peter was miraculously released from prison, that he might escape the same fate, by following the example of the rest of his brethren, and seeking safety in flight. This opinion is confirmed by the little evidence remaining to us in ecclesiastical history. The general conclusion to which we are led by the fathers, is, that the apostles left Jerusalem twelve years after the ascension of our Lord. He ascended A.D. 29. The twelfth year therefore brings us to the beginning * For Aotiocb, read Jerusalem in the margin, through tbe former part of this section. VOL. II. L 146 ST. PETER RETIRES FROM JERUSALEM— CHAP. X. Jnlian Pe- of the reign of Claudius ; the very period when Herod Agrippa Jernsalem. riod, 475G. took possession of the kingdom of Judea. He lost no time in Valgar^Era, giving proofs of liis zealous Judaism, and we may believe that about 43. he would lose no lime in demonstrating his sincerity, by renew- ing the persecution; in the course of which the apostles were obliged to leave Jerusalem. Clement of Alexandria (6), about 194, quotes a work, entitled the Preaching of St. Peter. '* The Lord said to his apostles, if any Israelite will repent, and believe in God through my name, his sins shall be forgiven. After twelve years go ye out into all the world, that none may say, We have not heard (c).'' Eusebius mentions that Apollonius, (undoubtedly in part co- temporary with Clement, and placed by Cave at the year 192 — by Lardnerat 211, as near the time of his writing against the Mon- tanists,) relates, as from tradition, that our Saviour com manded his apostles not to depart from Jerusalem for the space of twelve years. The same historian, in his Ecclesiastical His- tory writes, " Peter, by the direction of Providence, came to Rome in the reign of Claudius, to contend with and overcome Simon Magus ;" and, in his Chronicon, that after he had been at Antioch he went to Rome, in the second year of Claudius, i. e. the year of Christ 44. Those who espouse this opinion, suppose the Gospel of St. Mark to be written about this time. The same opinion also is maintained at the end of the Arabic version, and of many ancient manuscripts of this Gospel, par- ticularly one mentioned by Dr. Hammond, two referred to by Father Simon, and thirteen cited by Dr. Mill, by Theophylact also, and others of the Greek scholiasts. Considering this supposition as correct, it by no means im- plies that St. Peter continued long at Rome, as the Romish Church assert.. There is internal evidence to the contrary ; for we tind St. Paul does not salute him in his Epistle to the Romans — neither did he meet him on his first coming to Rome, in the be- ginning of the reign of Nero. St. Paul does not mention St. Peter in any of the epistles he wrote from Rome; and in his Epistle to the Colossians, St, Peter's name is not mentioned among his coadjutors. In the work of Lactantius (or of L. Caecilius, according to L. Clerc,) it is said Peter came to Rome in the time of Nero, and made many converts, and formed a Church — an account which at once confutes the fable that he had been there twenty-five years as Bishop of Rome, on which assertion the supremacy of the Pope is founded. The probable conclusion therefore is, that St. Peter took re- fuge at Rome, during the Herodian persecution, to which place he was accompanied by St. Mark, and after staying there some short time, Peter, like the rest of the apostles, superin- tended the Hebrew Christian, and not the Gentile Churches; travelling from place to place, till he returned to Jerusalem, to be present at the apostolic council. That St. Peter was martyred at Rome, (a circumstance which many protestant writers have discredited, from the fear of giving countenance to the unfounded, and therefore absurd, doctrine of the pope's supremacy,) has been asserted by Igna- tius, Dionysius, Irenams, Clement, Tertullian, Caius, Origen, Cyprian, Lactantius, Eusebius, Athanasius, Ephraim, Epipha- nius, Jerome, Chrysostom, and many others (hth year of Nero, Anianus, the first Bishop of Alexandria, after Mark, the apostle and evangelist, took upon him the care of that Church (i7). The accounts arc so brief, that the exact period of his leaving Barnabas, and residing at Alexandria, cannot be ascertained. The last verse of St. Mark's Gospel, which contains an allusion RELIEF IS SENT TO JERUSALEM— CHAP. X. 15 ^ Julian Pe- SECTION X. Antiocli. VulirnrJEra, The Converts at Antioch, being forewarned by Agabus, about 44. send relief to their Brethren at Jerusalem, hj the hands of Barnabas and Saul. to the progress of the Gospel, is supposed to be of a later date than the rest of the history, which has given rise to a doubt as to the authcnticit}' of the last twelve verses • but if we suppose the Gospel was first published at Rome, and completed at Alex- andria, and the last twelve verses added there, we can have no difficulty in accounting for this difi'erence of date. The conclusion to which Dr. Townson has arrived, after con- sidering the evidence in favour of the early date of St. Mark's Gospel, does not materially differ from that which I have been now advocating. He supposes that St. Mark's Gospel was pub- lished in Italy j but that St. Mark came to Rome by himself, studied the state of the Church there, returned to Asia, and in conjunc- tion Avitb St. Peter, drew up his Gospel for the benefit of the converts in that city. Dr. Townson has adopted this perplexed theory, to avoid the opinion that St. Peter came to Rome in the reign of Claudius. Lord Barrington assigns to St. Mark's Gos- pel the date I have now adopted. After considering the whole evidence respecting the Gospel of St. Mark, I cannot but conclude that it was written at a much earlier date than has been generally assigned to it by Pro- testant writers. The Gospel of St. Matthew was written in the first persecution, when the tidings of salvation were preached to the Jews only. The Gospel of St. Mark was published during the second persecution of the Christian Church, when the devout Gentiles, such as Cornelius, were appealed to. Both were mercifully adapted to these two stages of the Church's progress. The Gospel of St. Luke was addressed to the Gen- tiles of Asia; and that of St. John was the supplement to the rest, and completed and perfected the canon of the New Testa- ment. Each was fitted to the condition of the Church at the time of their respective publication ; and they now form unitedly one sublime and perfect system of truth, the immove- able foundation of the temple of God. (rt) Bishop Burgess' Inquiry into the Origin of the Christian Church ; reprinted in the Churchman armed ap;ainst the Errors of the Times, vol.i. p. 319. (&) Wetstein in loc. and Kuinoel m lib. N. T. Hist. Comment, vol. iv. p. 419. (c) Clem. Strom, lib. vi. p. 636. Cave's Historia Lite- raria, torn. i. p. 5. Grabes Spic. torn. i. p. 67. Ap. Lardner, vol. iii. p. 167-8. (rf) That St. Peter was certainly at Rome, is fully proved by the learned Pearson, in his Dissertation de Serie, et successione Pri- morum llomae Episcoporum, Diss. i. cap. vii. Romte fuisse S. Petrura probatur veterum Testimoniis, p. 33. Cave, however, remarks upon the theory of his going to that metropolis upon the present occasion — Quod vero de hoc Romam adventu somniant, gratis oumino dictum est. AI- tum de eo apud veteres silentium. Silet imprimis historia apostolica, quas de hoc aliove adventu ne verbuhnn habet, &c. (Sec. — See Caye, His- toria Literaria, vol.i. p. 8. Bishop Burgess quotes with approbation the opinion of Bishop Stillingfleet, which is founded on a passage in Lactan- tius, that St. Peter ams never at Rome till the period of his martyrdom. Stillingfleet's Origines Britaunicic,fol. edit. p. 48. — Barrow on the Pope's Supremacy, folio edit. p. 83. (e) See Bishop Marsh's Michaelis, vol. iii. part i. p. 212. ; and vol. i. chap. iv. sect. \. p. 163. — Dr. Campbell's pre- face to Mark, vol. ii. p. 82, 83 — Home's Critical Introduction on Mark. — Dr. Townson's Works, vol. i. p. 151. 163. (/) Ap. Lardner's Works, vol. iii. p. 177. vol. ii. p. .>52. and vol. iii. p. 179. (f/) Euscb. Eccles. Hist, lib. ii. cap. 16 and 24. — Ap, Lardncr's Supplement to the Credibility. ' , r^ THE FAMINE IN THE REIGN OF j„,i.^„ i>c. ACTS xi. 27. to the end '\ Aniioch. riod, 1754. <;7 ^^(1 in these days came prophets •* from Jerusalem ^Suf'unwAntioch. '3 The transpositions in the order of the sacred narrative which I liave thought it advisable to make in this, the preced- ing, and the following sections, have been adopted from a consideration of the circumstances of the Christian Church at this period. The first persecution of the Church by the Sanhedrim, was terminated by the conversion of St. Paul ; the second persecution, which had now begun, was the work of Herod Agrippa, the great favourite of the Emperor Claudius. Dr. Lardner is of opinion that the previous repose of the Church continued only a year, or a short time longer, and that the dis- turbances of the Church began in the year 41, when Herod was invested by Claudius with full power. He observes — '' From the very beginning of his reign, especially from his arrival in Judea, and during the remainder of it, the disciples must have been under many difficulties and discouragements." The Jews, and their new sovereign, who was very rigid and punctual in his observances of the Mosaic law, were alike disposed to harass the Christians, as an increasing heresy. The persecution, therefore, which had ceased for a time, would soon be openly renewed ; and as James had been put to death, and Peter thrown into prison, I consider this (see note 11, p, 144, &c.) to have been the moment when the apostles for the first time left Judef., and not as Dr. Lardner supposes, about the year 49 or 50, after the apostolic couucil. Two circumstances related in the sacred narrative confirm me yet further in this opinion, and seem to justify the transposition 1 have here made. One is, that we read for the first time that prophets, who appear to have been next in order to the apostles, went down from Jeru- salem to Antioch ; the other is, that when Paul and Barnabas arrived at Jerusalem, in consequence of their mission from the Church at Antioch, after the prophets had foretold the famine, the Church sent their contributions to the elders, and not to the apostles : (chap. xi. 30.) and that St. Paul, in his account of his coming up to Jerusalem on this occasion, tells us that he found none of the apostles at Jerusalem but James, the Lord's brother, (Gal. i. 18.) — See Lardner's Supplement to the Credi- bility, chap. vi. on the time when the apostles left Judea. '^ One manuscript only, the Cambridge manuscript, reads here, " As we were together," from which it has been inferred, that St. Luke was now with St. Paul. This, however, is not suffi- cient authority to enable us to conclude against the general opi- nion of the Church, and the concurrent testimony of manu- scripts, that this evangelist certainly joined St. Paul till his arrival at Mysia, (Actsxvi. 10.) This prophesy of Agabus resembled those of the ancient prophets, not merely in the certainty, but in the manner of its fuHilment. It was accomplished in the first (a) and second )ear of Claudius. A second famine (b) was in the fourth year of Claudius, when Helena, Queen of the Adiabeni, sent assistance lo Iho Jews. A third famine (c) was in the ninth year of Clau- dius. A fourth (rf) in the eleventh year. The most severe of these happened between the fourth and therighlh years of Claudius, under the government ofCuspius Fadus, or under that of Tiberius Alexander, pcrha})s under both. There, is sonic reason to imagine, that a famine was be- CLAUDIUS IS PREDICTED— CHAP. X. 153 Julian Pe- 28 And there stood up one of them, named Agabus, Amioch. V*'?' ^^M ^"^ signified by the Spirit that there should be great 44" ^^'^ ' dearth throughout all the world : which came to pass in the days of Claudius Cesar. 29 Then the disciples, every man according to his abi- lity, determined to send relief unto the brethren which dwelt in Judea : 30 Which also they did, and sent it to the elders *^ by the hands of Barnabas and Saul. ginning to be feared in Syria, about the time of the death of Agrippa, the father, or the elder. St. Luke says that this prince, forming the design of making war upon the Tyrians and Sido- nians, they sought a peace, which they wanted, '' because they obtained their provisions from the king's country." These nations, who had the sea open, would have had no need of a famine, if there had been plenty of provisions elsewhere. (a) This is mentioned, with its causes, by Dio Cassias, 9. p. 949. Ed. Reimar. ap. Kuinoel in lib. Hist. N. T. Comment, vol. iv. p. 399. (6) Scaliger. animadv. ad Euseb. p. 192. and Whitby in loc. (c) Sca- liger ut sup. &c. p. 79. (d) Sueton. Vit. Claud, c. 18. See Walchius, Dissert, de Agabo vase. '5 It is now that we first meet with the disputed word Presby- ter. It occurs in the last verse of Acts xi. The corn collected by the Church at Antioch, for the relief of the brethren in Je- rusalem, was sent to the Presbyters, or elders. The word r6 Trpeatvrepiov occurs in the New Testament three times — in Luke xxii. 66. Acts xxii. 5. and 1 Tim. iv. 14. The signification of the word must be ascertained from the interpretation given to it in the time of the inspired writers. The term Presbytery was applied to an united body of men, and the word Presbyter was given to the members of which it was individually composed. In the first of these passages it refers to the Sanhedrim, and it is well translated by Dr. Campbell " the national senate." In the second it has the same meaning. In the third it is used by St. Paul, to denote the collected body of the elders^ or ministers, who assisted at the ordination of Timothy. As the Jewish Sanhedrim, with their head, consulted for the benefit of the Jewish nation, so might the Christian presbyters, with their head, consult the public welfare of the Christian churches. The members of the Sanhedrim were not equal in authority to the Nasi, neither were the Presbyters of the New Testament, reasoning on the same analogy, equal in authority to him who was their Nasi, or Prince ; that is, the apostle, or his successor. But the Presbytery who governed the Christian Church at Jerusalem, and to whom St. Paul went, had no civil power, their authority was exclusively spiritual j and their head, or Nasi, or Prince, must therefore have possessed powers of a spiritual nature, superior to those which were possessed by the general body. And this appears to have been the case, from the unanimous testimon} of antiquity. The privilege of preach- ing, teaching, and many other things, was common to ail ; the power of ordaining, and deciding, was reserved for one. Thus Timothy was ordained with the concurrence and sanction of the Presbytery, or general body of ministers ; but he was not ordained bi/ them, but by St. Paul. This, then, explains the meaning of the word in the third passage, in which the word Presbytery occurs, and enables us lo usccrlain with greater pre- 154 THE DEATH OF HEROD AGRIPPA— CHAP. X. Julian Pe- SECTION )Ll. Cesarea. riod, 1757. Vuigaii^ra, The Death of Herod AgHppa. 44. ACTS xii. part of ver. 19. and ver. 20 — 23. 2 9 — And he went down from Judea to Cesarea, and there abode. 20 And Herod was highly displeased with them of Tyre and Sidon : but they came with one accord to him, and, having made Blastus, the king's chamberlain, their friend, desired peace ; because their country was nou- rished by the king's country. 21 And upon a set day, Herod, arrayed in royal appa- rel, sat upon his throne, and made an oration unto them, cision the import of the word Presbyter in this passage, where it is used with reference to the officers of a Christian Church. But we are enabled to learn the precise meaning of the word Preshyter not only from the phrase " The Presbytery," but from its usual acceptation both among the Jews and Gentiles. It sometimes occurs in the usual sense of " older in years," as contrasted with the word younger, 1 Tim. v. 1. Sometimes it denotes the elders, or predecessors of the existing generation, who had exercised authority as teachers, or were remembered for their exertions, talents, or wisdom. (Matt. xv. 2. Mark vii. 3. 5. Heb. xi. 2.) It is a name of dignity, denoting the members of the Sanhedrim, the rulers of the synagogues, and leaders of Israel in general; It chiefly signifies those among the Jews, who in their several cities were the heads and chiefs of congre- gations assembled for religious worship ; and from this use of the word it was adopted by the writers of the Acts and the Epis- tles, to describe those who were ordained to officiate in sacred things ; to administer the sacraments, to instruct and rule and control their respective congregations, under the direction of a superior head, to whom they were responsible, and to execute every ecclesiastical duty except those few of a higher nature, which were reserved for the acknowledged superiors, by whom they had themselves been appointed to the exercise of their spi- ritual functions : their power was so great in these departments, and their office was so important, that they are honoured with the epithet of Bishop, or Episcopus, which in subsequent ages was exclusively confined to those who imparted the Presbyteral power. Whitby, however, is of opinion that the elders here mentioned might not even be Christians, but the elders of the Jewish syna- gogues, or the Trpwroi rwv 'IsporroXu/iirwj/, the chief men of Je- rusalem, to whom King Izates sent relief at the same time ; or if they were Christians, they might still be the elders of the synagogues, the Christians then retaining the Jewish rites. To the iTrst of these opinions it may be answered, that in ver. 29. wc read that the relief which the Church at Antioch sent to Jerusalem, was intended for their own brethren. The second "pinion is conjectural, but not probable. The elders of the synii^ro^rues who were converted, might have been admitted aiiioMir the elders of the infant Church. Whether the Christian Church was entirely constructed on the model of Uie, J(>\vish synagogue, as Grotius asserts, will be ronsidercd in Uic notes to the next chapter of this urrangc- mcnl. PAUL RETURNS TO ANTIOCH-CIIAP. X. 155 Julian Pe- 22 And the people gave a shout, sayings It is the voice Cesarea. Vutr ^^m' ^^ ^ ^^^' ^^^^ "^^ ^^ ^ man. 44. " ' 23 And immediately the angel of the Lord smote him, because he gave not God the glory ; and he was eaten of worms, and gave up the ghost "^. SECTION XII. The Churches continue to increase. ACTS xii. 24. 24 But the word of God grew, and multiplied. SECTION XIII. Julian Pe- Said having seen a vision in the Temple ''', in which he is riod, 4758. Vulgar^Era, 45. '^ See the aceount in Josephus Antiq. 19. 7. 2. *7 I refer the vision seen by St. Paul in the temple, mentioned in Acts xxii, 17 — 24. and the commission he then received to preach to the Gentiles to this period of his history, principally on the authority of Lord Harrington and Dr. Benson, who maintain also that this vision was the same as the extacy alluded to in 2 Cor. xii. 2. though Dr. Doddridge would rather refer this vision to St. Paul's first return to Jerasalem. Dr. Lardner discusses at some length the question when St. Paul was made an apostle, and concludes that he was appointed to the apostolic office on his conversion : one of his principal arguments is, that he began to preach so soon after that event. That the ultimate object which our Saviour proposed to St. Paul, was mentioned to him at his conversion, is evident, from his own narration, Acts xxvi. 17, 18. But it is equally certain that he did not exercise the apostolic functions till the Holy Ghost separated him for the work to which he had been called, and till he had been ordained by the laying on of hands. With respect to Dr. Lardner's remark, that Paul was made an apostle, it is only necessary to observe, what perhaps the learned writer would not acknowledge, that there were various duties attached to the various orders of ministers in the service of God. The deacons, evangelists, and elders, might preach as well as the apostles; but to the apostles only belonged the power of governing, and controlling, and superintending the Churches, the ordaining of elders, &c. &c. which things St. Paul did not attempt to do, till he returned from Jerusalem to Antioch. As the essay of Lord Barrington on this subject is not in the hands of many students of Scripture, I have added an abridg- ment of it. The learned writer defines an apostle to be one who was a chief and primary minister of the kingdom of Christ, who was commissioned by God to testify the great facts of Chris- tianity, as far as he was personally acquainted with them ; par- ticularly that of the resurrection, and who was endued with superior courage in times of danger, and with extraordinary powers of working miracles, and imparting the Holy Ghost. It is the object of this essay to fix the precise time when Paul received his commission, which Lord Harrington supposes to have been at his second visit to Jerusalem, when he saw Christ 156 PAUL RETURNS TO ANTIOCH- CHAP. X. Julian Pe- commanded to leave Jerusalem,, and toj^rcach to the Gen- Jerusalem. rio(] '"'" - - Vul 45. riod, 4758. f^j^ returns rvith Barnabas to AntwcJu VulgariTira, ' in a trance, A.D. 43. In support of the opinion, that at his conversion Paul was not made an apostle, the noble author argues, after discussing the question whether St. Paul saw Christ personally at his couversion, and deciding it in the nega- tive, that St. Paul only preached to Jews, or Proselytes of the Gate, before his second journey to Jerusalem, and was not till that time properly an apostle : he seems to have acted only as a prophet or teacher, having only received a prediction that " God had chosen him that he should know his will." His preaching to the Jews does not prove his apostolic com- mission, for he was to be the apostle of the Gentiles ; nor can this term (Gentiles) be applied to the Proselytes of the Gate. These were obliged to submit to all the laws of Moses, and by Gentiles in Scripture are meant those who served false gods. They are described as those who are " carried away or led after dumb idols ; without God, without hope, under the power of the wicked one." St. Paul is said to have '' opened their eyes, and turned them from darkness to light, from the power of Satan unto God." This could not be applied to the Proselytes of the Gate, who had the knowledge of God's law, and are said to be of clean hands, and a pure heart, &c. ; and indeed the word used in Acts is always applied to idolatrous Gentiles, unless particu- larly restricted in sense by some other word. It seems that it was not known to the Church, nor indeed to the other apostles, that St. Paul had received a commission to preach to the Gen- tiles till his third journey to Jerusalem, of which they would probably have been informed, had that commission been given very long before ; and he appeals to the being acknowledged as a fellow apostle by his enemies. None of his Epistles were writ- ten till some time after the year 43, and till that period he nei- ther preached or acted with any boldness. His journey to Arabia, immediately after his conversion, Lord Harrington ex- plains thus : — He merely preached to Christian Hebrews in an adjoining country to Judea, who were protected by Aretas, king of the country, in opposition to Herod, with whom he was at war ; and here it is not probable he ever preached to proselytes, for Cornelius and his family are said to be the iirst-fruits of the heathens or (proselytes) who Avere converted about the year 41, and St. Paul's journey to Arabia took place in 35, A.D. The account St. Paul gives before Agrippa, (Acts xxvi.) has been adduced as an argument that he was appointed apostle at his conversion ; but is it not more likely, that he would give a brief and perhaps obscure relation of this event before the king, than tliat the two accounts of the circumstance (Acts ix. and xxii) •should l)e incorrect? and in both these places it seems to spe- cify that no commission was received. If, indeed, the Gentiles wore converted so early as has been generally supposed, they would have formed part of the Christian Church, before Peter preached to the Proselytes of the Gate, which would destroy the wise order in which Christianity was spread, which was in the order our Saviour had before preached, and agrees also to his prediction, as related in Acts i. 8, &c. first to the Jews of the H«»ly City, thon in Judea, then in Samarin, to the prosc- Jyl«s, iUKi lastly to the Gentiles. Again Paul says, that at first (alter Ins conversion) he preached '' the faith he once destroy- ed," and that afi.rrwards he committed the Gospel he preached io the Genlilcb. He did not change his name to Paul till ten PAUL RETURNS TO ANTIOCH-CHAP. X. 157 ACTS xii. 25 '\ Jerusalem. Julian Pe- riod, 4758. 25 And Barnabas and Saul returned from Jerusalem, Vulgar^ra, ^^^^^ they had fulfilled their ministry, and took with them John, whose surname was Mark. years after his conversion, and he altered it then from a Jewish to a Roman name. He is always placed after Barnabas till a short time after his second journey to Jerusalem, and the con- trary from this period. Lastly, it is not probable that Christ ^ave him his commission at the time of his first journey to Je- rusalem, for he says himself, " When I was come again to Jeru- salem," Acts xxii. 17. ; and this may be better seen by compar- in'T Acts ix. 26. Gal. i. 18. with Acts xi. 29, 30. and xii. 25. At Paul's second journey to Jerusalem, he received from Christ an apostolic commission. Lord Harrington says, we may be sure this was the first time Paul saw the Saviour, from the par- ticular emphasis he lays on the vision, Acts xxii. 18. He speaks of this revelation to the Corinthians, in his second Ii.pis- tle to them, which was written about the year 58, as having taken place fourteen years preceding, and seems to point out that he then received his commission as apostle of the Gentiles, (2 Cor. xii.) which account agrees well with the prediction of Ananias. He speaks of it as an " high vision and revelation, ' something whereof he might boast and glory— a mystery now to be made manifest— a revelation of importance— (Colos. i. 27. Eph. iii.) where it appears St. Paul thinks it the greatest ot all his revelations. . r... i Lord Barring-ton supposes that he had some view of the glory of heaven, for his encouragement in the difticulties he had to encounter, and makes a singular conjecture concerning the " thorn in the flesh," of which St. Paul speaks in his relation of his vision to the Corinthians, which he supposes to have been some bodily infirmitv caused by the heavenly glory, which was too great for him to bear ; as stammering, or a convulsive mo- tion in the muscles of his face, which made him fear the Gen- tiles who paid great regard to eloquence and outward appear- ances, would despise him, as Moses was afraid of appearing before Pharaoh for the sam,e reason. He therefore besought the Lord thrice that it might depart from him ; but after he \yas assured that Christ's strength should be made perfect in his in- firmities, he gloried in his weakness. , „ ,, There were none of the apostles at Jerusalem at Paul s second journey there, probably that it might be manifest that he received his mission from no man ; and of this circumstance he often particularly informs us, that he received his message from Christ alone (a). (a) See Hales's Analysis, vol. ii. part ii. p. 1211 -Miscellanea Sacra, Essay iii.-Doddridge's Family Expositor, notes on Acts xxu. and Dr. Lardner. 18 Mr. Fleming would place this passage after the account of the death of James, and in the interval between the committal and the deliverance of Peter from prison. Dr. Lardner, whose authority I follow, adheres to the present order of the sacred text and argues that the commission of Barnabas and Saul was not given till after the death of Herod (a). (a) Flem.Christology. vol. ii.p. 230.and Lardner's Credibility, book i. chap. ii. sect. ii. vol. i.-Ap. Doddridge's Family Expositor, vol. m. p. SB. 158 ST. PAUL IS MADE AN APOSTLE— CHAP. XL Julian Pe- CHAPTER XI. nod, 4750. ViilgariEra, Period for preaching the Gospel to the idolatrous Gentiles, and St. PauVs first ApostolicalJourney, SECTION I. The Aiwstles having been absent from Jerusalem, when Saul saw his Vision in the Temple, he and Barnabas are separated to the Apostolic Office by the Heads of the Church at Antioch. ACTS xiii. 1 — 3. 1 Now there were in the church that was at Antioch, Antlooh. certain prophets and teachers ; as Barnabas, and Simeon that was called Niger, and Lucius of Cyrene, and Manaen, which had been brought up with Herod the tetrarch, and Saul. 2 As they ministered to the Lord, and fasted, tlie Holy Ghost said, Separate me Barnabas and Saul, for the work whereunto I have called them. 3 And when they had fasted and prayed, and laid their hands on them, they sent them away '. • The learned and judicious Hooker (a) has conjectured that Barnabas and haul were now set apart for their anostleship, to supplythevacancie.iinthe original number, one having been killed by Herod, the other appointed Bishop of Jerusalem? Dr Haies (6) approves this opinion. It is much to be regretted that the seventh book of the Ecclesiastical Polity is one of those which we cannot be certain, received the last corrections of their author, or indeed were certainly written by him The conjecture, however, is that of one who had carefully studied the Scripture narrative, and is by no means improbable. As St. Paul and Barnabas had been already peculiarly set apart to their high office, we cannot attribute their authority to the prophets and teachers in the Church at Antioch, who here olhciated by an especial command of God, through the Holy Spirit. St. Paul expressly declares that he was not an apostle i)y man We are assured, too, in another passage of Scripture. Uiat without all doubt the less is blessed of the greater : if St. Paul^ therefore, had derived his commission as the apostle of the Gentiles from the Church at Antioch, the prophets who set •iim apart must have been either superior or equal to him. ihey were not superior, for the apostles are always ranked above any other class of ministers in the Christian Church— if ney were equal, they must have been elevated themselves to nr?/?N ^'^ apostle, as a learned divine has attempted to prove \c), ' MnT'lf ^P°s"<^s were in one sense of the word, each of them » osucs to the whole world: but insomuch as each took his pe- culiar department, he might be called the apostle of that dis- thflf t h , ";^'''" ''^ tl^cir Lord's vineyard. Thus we are assured his»\rv'" ■ ''' ^"^^^ ^^"^^^ of them his province, and ecclesiastical im, rob ,m'' n "»' ^'l.'^ "^'"'^ ""^ ^^^■''' ««^^^'''^' districts. It is not h^e^auosli^i n''*^'" '''" Holy Spirit had separated them lor the apostolic uihce in general, that St. Paul and Barnabas can- ST. PAUL BEGINS HIS FIRST JOURNEY— CHAP. XI. 159 Julian Pe- SECTION II. Seleacia. Yul'arMia '^^^^^ ^^ company with Barnabas, commences Ins first Apos- 45. ' tolical Journey i by going from Antioch to Seleucia. sented to become the apostles of the Church at Antioch in par- ticular. That Church had lately bestowed an honourable title upon the followers of Christ. It was the principal society, which did not consist of merely Jewish converts, and as St. Paul was set apart as the apostle of the Gentiles, it does not appear unreasonable to suppose that he would be willing to add to his influence the sanction of this venerable Church. The Church of Christ was at this time truly Catholic. It formed, as it ought ever to have done, and as it will again, at the coming period of its promised prosperity, one great society. It was united through all its congregations under the authority of its superior pastors, who assembled in council to decide upon any matter in which all were interested. There Avas no supremacy either of St. Peter, or any other of the apostles, and no schism or heresy among its people. The condescending of St. Paul to become the apostle of the Church at Antioch, so far as it might be useful to the Catholic Church to act with their sanction, does not imply that their authority was superior to his. His object may have been to obtain in those places which were under the influence of Antioch, a better or an easier introduction, than he would have otherwise experienced. This consideration appears to solve that great difficulty which many have experienced, in re- conciling the apostolic commission of St. Paul, by the Holy Spirit, with his being set apart by ecclesiastical officers of an in- ferior description. Among the prophets who were now in the Church at Antioch, we read of one Manaen. There is an account in Josephus of one Manaen (says Dr. Biscoe) an Essene, who foretold concerning Herod the Xlreat, that he should be a king, whilst he was yet a boy at school : and when it actually came to pass that he was king, being sent for by Herod, and asked how long he should reign, whether ten years ? he answered. Yes. — Twenty years ? Yes ; thirty years. Upon which Herod gave him his right hand, and from that time held in great esteem such who were of the sect of Essenes. Mr. Zachutus, a Jewish writer, says, that this Manaen was vice-pre- sident of the Sanhedrim under Hillel, and that Shammai suc- ceeded him ; that he went off into Herod's family and service with fourscore eminent men ; that he uttered many prophecies, foretold to Herod when he was yet very young, that he should come to reign ; and when he did reign, being sent for, foretold that he should reign above thirty years. The Talmudists also say, " That Manaen went out, and Shammai succeeded him. But whither went Manaen ? Abai says, he went into the ser- vice of the king, and with him went fourscore pair of disciples, clothed all in silk." It is very probable that a son of this Ma- naen, or some nephew, or other kinsman to whom he gave his name, was educated in the family of Herod the Great. The young Manaen might be of the same age, and have the same preceptors and tutors as had Herod Antipas, one of the sons of Herod the Great, and for that reason be said to be brought up with him in particular. This Herod Antipas was, after his fa- ther's death, tetrarch of Galilee, and is the person who put John the Baptist to death. Josephus says, of the first named Manaen, that he was reputed a man of an excellent life. The Talmudists tell us, that when he left the vice-presidentship of IGO ST. PAUL VISITS SELEUCIA, SALAMIS, &c.— CHAP. XI. Julian Pe- ACTS xiii. part of verse 4. VufgaS'fa, 4 So they, being sent forth by the Holy Ghost, de- Seleucia. 45. ' parted unto Seleucia. SECTION III. From Seleucia, to Salamis and Paphos, hi Cyprus, where Sergius Paulus (whose name was assumed hy Said J is con- verted. Being the first known or recorded Convert of the idolatrous Gentiles, ACTS xiii. part of ver. 4 — 13. 4 And from thence they sailed to Cyprus. Salamis, 5 And when they were at Salamis, they preached the ^^P^**** word of God in the synagogues of the Jews : and they had also John to their minister. 6 And when they had gone through the isle unto Pa- phos, they found a certain sorceror, a false prophet, a Jew, whose name was Bar-jesus : 7 Which was with the deputy ' of the country, Sergius the Sanhedrim to go into Herod's service, he went into all man- ner of wickedness. May they not have fixed this infamy upon him from his having shewn some mark of esteem for Christ and his followers ? or from the younger Manaen's becoming a Chris- tian ? (a) Hooker's Eccks. Polity, lib. vii. sec. 4. p. 337. (h) Hales's Anal, of Chronol. vol. ii. pt. 2. p. 1083. (c) Scett^s Christian Life, pt. 2. ch. vii. p. 491. folio edit. Joseph. Antiq. lib. 15. c. 10. sec. 5. Light- foot, vol. ii. p. 685, and vol. i. 288 — 2008. ap. Biscoe on the Acts. ' Sergius Paulus was the first convert of the idolatrous Gen- tiles. He was a magistrate : and, by his conversion and influ- ence, the preaching of St. Paul ^^ould probably excite still greater attention. The conversion of a magistrate, as the first- fruits of the idolatrous world, may be intended to shew to us that the Divine Author of Christianity appeals in a more espe- cial manner to those who are vested with authority and power, to embrace his religion, and to sanction and protect it to the utmost. It is observable here, says Bishop Marsh, that the Evangelist Luke, relating these transactions of Paul in Cyprus, gives to Sergius Paulus, the Roman governor of that island, the Greek title of Av^uTrarog, which was applied only to those governors of provinces who were invested with proconsular dignity. And on the supposition that Cyprus was not a province of this description, it has been inferred, that the title given to Sergius Paulus in the Acts of the Apostles, was a title that did not pro- perly belong to him. A passage, indeed, has been quoted from Dion Cassius, who, speaking of the governors of Cyprus, and some other Roman provinces, applies to them the same title which is applied to Scr;rius Paulus. But as Dion Cassius is speaking of several Roman provinces at the same time, one of which was certainly governed by a proconsul, it has been supposed that, for the sake of brevity, he used one term for all of them, whether it applied to all of them or not. That Cyprus, however, ought ELYMAS IS STRUCK BLIND— CHAP. XI. 161 Julian Pe- Paul US, a prudent man ; who called for Barnabas and SalamJs, Vuf 'al!S*a '^^"^' ^"^ desired to hear the word of God. Paphos. 45. '^ ' 8 But Elymas '^ the sorceror (for so is his name by in- terpretation) withstood them, seeking to turn away the deputy from the faith. 9 Then Saul (who also is called Paul ^), filled with the Holy Ghost, set his eyes on him, 10 And said, O full of all subtilty and all mischief, thou child of the devil, thou enemy of all righteousness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways of the Lord? 1 1 And now, behold, the hand of the Lord is upovi thee, and thou shalt be blind, not seeing the sun for a season. And immediately there fell on him a mist and a not to be excepted, and that the title which he employed, as well as St. Luke, really did belong to the Roman governors of Cyprus, appears from the inscription on a coin belonging to Cyprus itself, and struck in the very age in which Sergius Pau- lus was governor of that island. It was struck in the reign of Claudius Caesar, whose head and nanis are on the face of it: and in the reign of Claudius CaBsar St. Paul visited Cyprus. It was a coin belonging to the people of that island, as appears from the word KYITPIQN on the reverse ; and, though not stfuck while Sergius Paulus himself was governor, it was struck, as appears from the inscription on the reverse, in the time of Proclus, who was next to Sergius Paulus in the government of that island. And on this coin the same title, ANGYITATOS, is given to Proclus, which is given by St. Luke to Sergius Pau- lus (a). That Cyprus was a proconsulate, is also evident from an ancient inscription of Caligula's reign, (the predecessor of Claudius), in which Aquius Scaura is called the proconsul of Cyprus (6). (a) Bishop Marsh's Lectures, part V. pp. 85, 86. An engraving of the above noticed coin may be seen in Havercamp's edition of the The- sauru.s Moreilianus, in the plate belonging to p. 106. (6) Gruteri Corpus Inscriptionum, torn. I. pars. ii. p. 360. no. 3. edit. Grievii. Amst. 1707. 2 The word Elymas is derived, by Pfeifler, from the Arabic a*by, sciens, sapiens. See his Dubia vexata, p. 943. Loesneri observ. ad Nov. Testam. e Philone Alexand, p. 204, and Kul- noel. ^ It is uncertain on what account the name of Paul is used by St. Luke through the remainder of his narrative, instead of Saul(a). Some have supposed that Paul was the Roman name, given him from his birth, with his Jewish patronymic, Saul. Others, that it was a token of his humility ; the word " Saul" meanitig beloved, or desirable; and *' Paul " denoting " weak, or little." Others, and it is the most general opinion, that the uame Paul was assumed by the apostle in memory of the con- version of the proconsul Sergius Paulus: A primo ecclesiae spolio proconsule Sergio Paulo victoria? suae trojjhsea retulit, erexitque vexillum ut Paulo, ex Saulo vocaretur (6). Others, that it was assumed as a name more pleasing to the ears of his audiences among the Gentiles. (a) See on'this point Witsii Melet. Leidens, p. 47. (6) Jerome, lib. i. ap. Kuinoel in lib. Hist. N. T. comment, vol. iv. p. 457. 9. v. VOL. II. M 1G2 ST. PAUL GOES to CYPRUS and PEHGA— CHAP. XI. Julian Pe- darkness: and he went about seeking some to lead him Salamis, riod,47^6. by the hand. PaP^o^- 45" ^^'' ''^^' 12 Then the deputy, when he saw what was done, be- lieved, being astonished at the doctrine of the Lord. SECTION IV. From Cyprus to Perga, in Pamphylia. ACTS xiii. IS. 1 3 Now when Paul and his company loosed from Pa- Perga. phos, they came to Perga in Pamphylia : and John, de- parting from them, returned to Jerusalem. SECTION V. From Perga to Antioch, in Pisidia — St. Paul, according to his custom, first preaches to the Jews — They are driven out of Antioch, ACTS xiii. 14 — 50. Julian Pe- 14 But when they departed from Perga, they came to Antioch, VufgatSI'a ^"^'o*^^^ '" Pisidia, and went into the synagogue on the Pi'i^ia. 46. ' sabbath-day *, and sat down. 4 The learned Mr. Biscoe(a) observes, that St. Paul, as a Jewish doctor, or teacher, was privileged to teach in the syna- gogues. We cannot sufficiently admire the manner in which the providence of God ordained that every thing should con- tribute to the success of the new religion. The whole world was under one government, the protection of which ensured the common safety of the Jews and Christians under their own laws. When the Jews persecuted the Christians the Romans did not interfere, because they considered at first the Chris- tians as a Jewish sect, and probably as very little better than criminals. The divisions between them must have been soon observed by the idolatrous Gentiles, and would naturally excite their curiosity and attention. The Jews had hitherto been united among themselves, and had met with no opposition from their own nation, in the public profession of their religion, till the Christians proclaimed to them, and to the world, the advent of the long promised Messiah— the abolition of the Mosaic law, and the establishment of a more perfect dispensation, in which all mankind were alike interested. These novel and important truths, together with the miracle which the apostle had so lately wrought, were sufficient to secure to him the regard and consi- deration of the Heathen, and convince them at least of his superiority and power. For God " orderelh all things accord- ing to the council of his own will." Lightfoot, Vitringa, Grotius, Sclden, and many others, have endeavoured to prove from this, and other passages, that the mi- nisters, and Ihe modes of worship, in the primitive ('hristian Churr lies, were derived from, and were entirely assimilated to, the officers and services in the Jewish synagogues. As the first places of worship among the Christians were either the temple, the synagogues, or the vTrepoJa, or upper rooms, so frequently mentioned in the Acts, it is by no means improbable that many ST. PAUL— AT ANTIOCII IN PISIDIA— CHAP. XI. iQy, JuUm) Pe- J 5 And after the reading of the law and the prophets, Antioch, in nod, 4757. ^ ^ ^ Pisidia. Vulgar^Era, ~~~ about 46. of their customs would be derived from their former faith and worship; but it cannot be proved that the Christian Church was the mere transcript of that which preceded it. We have abundant reason to believe, that the modes of worship among the early Christians were, in m any respects, totally dissimilar to those of the synagogue. The learned Joseph Mede (i), as I have shewn above, has defended the opinion at great length, that there were Churches, iKK\ri, »" riod,4757. ^nce ^ Vulgar /Era, ^ ^ '^^^^ ^^j ^^ ^y^j^ p^Qpig ^f jgyael chose our fathers, and exalted the people when they dwelt as strangers in the land of Egypt, and with an high arm brought he them out of it. toribus Synagogorum, minus recte annumerantur, D-oboi niU'J^, decern otiosi, 6cc. &c. tales auteni Don erant, nisi in urbibus majoribus. Iken. Antiq. HebraiccU, pt. 1. cap. ix. de Sjnagogis, sec. 9. {d) Bingham's Eccles. Antiq. vol. iii. book 8. chap. 3. (e) IOHD: v3 bv nD23n irNT riD33n "im. The rnler of the synagogue is he, bj whose voice the business of the synagogue is settled. R. Salomo in Annot. ad Sotae, cap. vii. sec. 7. ap. Vitringa Archisynagogus, p. 78. (/ ) Ecclesia tamen Christiana primteva, hunc titulum syuagogae reliquit. Praspositos suos non vocavit, dpx^^'^G '''VQ iKK\r]aiaQ ; sed potius presbyteros episcopos, pastores, ductores. Seque ob banc manifestam rationera, quia ecclesia novi foederis nullara fert a.QX'H'^y nallum imperimii. De Synag. Vetere, lib. iii. Part 1. p. 610. Pra-ter hunc titulum, alius quidem quantum mihi constat, in scriptis N. T. non reperitur, qui directe ad prae- ft^turam synagogae respicit. Vitringa de Archisyn. ap. De Synag. vetere. lib. iii. parti, cap. i. p. 611. Syrus interpres rove 'Apxitryvaywysf, apud Lucam verlit per Kn\i'l3D*i XU'^'i'p; presbyteros Synagogae. I have, however, shewn that there is no analogy whatever between these and the Christian minister. Vitringa De Synag. vel. lib. iii. part 1. cap. 1. p. 614. (<;) Episcopi vero an in primis ecclesiis pro ap%teryva- ywywr, more sudaria agitarint, ego equidem fateor me ignorare, &c. &c. &c. For the meaning of the phrase sudaria agitarint, I mnst refer the reader to the treatise itself. (/») De Synag. vetere, lib. iii. pars. 2. cap. 3. p. 909. (ii) Schoetgen Horse Hebraicac, vol. i. p. 1089. {k) Sallust says, the deliberative part of the Roman legislature were called fathers — vel aetate, vel curae similitudine. — See note 15, chap. x. of this arrangement. (/) See on this point Vitringa, De Nominibus Praefectorum Synagogae et ecclesiae — De Synag. vetere, lib. iii. pars. 1. cap. 1. p. 614. (m) Fleury's Manners of the Ancient Israelites, by Clarke, p. 162. and Schleusner on the word Trptcrgurfpof. ^ This oration of St. Paul, the last he addressed peculiarly to the former objects of his patriotic aflection, is most worthy the altention of the sons of Israel at present. Nothing can be added to the arguments which the apostles have addressed in their reported sermons and their invaluable epistles, to their beloved countrymen : and their doctrines seem to be all com- prised in this address of St. Paul. He reminds them of the former mercies of God to the family of Abraham, and the pre- diction that their Messiah should be descended from David ; and asserts that this Messiah was Jesus of Nazareth. He ap- peals to the well-known fact of the resurrection of Christ from the dead, as the principal evidence of the truth of his declara- tion, and concludes with enforcing that one important truth, in which the whole human race arc so immediately interested, that forgiveness of sins is to be proclaimed through Him alone ; and that Christ alone can justify the Christian, not only from those ollences, from which they were typically purified by the ceremonial law, but from those sins also"^for which that law had made no provision. For we have now the comfortable hope •hat all manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven to men, through the mercy and intercession of Christ ; on the condition ol sincere repenlanc-e, amendment of life, and faith in the great ttoncnirnt. AT ANTIOCH IN PISIDIA-CHAP. XI. 169 Julian Pe- 18 And about the time of forty years suffered he their An^^cb. ia i^^'^^^J' manners in the wilderness ^ . VulgarvEra, ^^ And when he had destroyed seven nations m the land of Chanaan, he divided their land to them by lot. 20 And after that, he gave unto them judges, about the space of four hundred and fifty years, untd Samuel the prophet \ 6 The word in the original ought rather to have been ren- dered for forty years " he carried them in his arms, in the wil- derness, as a nurse." It is used in a similar sense in the Alex- andrian septuagint version,Deut. i. 31. iTpo(po(i)6pi}(Tai ae Kt'-piog, wc ti rig Tpo(bo7roe rbv v'lbv avrov. The Lord bare thee, as a man doth bear his son, is the translation in the authorized version. For ^rpo7ro(^6p7j(TU', the common reading which our translators have rendered " He bare their manners Griesbach would insert kTpo(pop6pr]>t of the well-disposed Gcnlilei-, 184 PAUL AND IJARNABAS go up to JERUSALEM— CHAP. XI. Julian Pe- whole chiirch, to send chosen men of their own company Jerusalem. riod,4760. . 1 Vulpar^ra, who did not go entirely over to the Jewish religion. The Pro- 49. selytes of the Gate at Antioch, had been first converted to Chris- tianity by the men of Cyprus and Cyrene, who were among those dispersed at the first persecution that ensued upon Ste- phen's martyrdom, and are called Grecians, which should be rather rendered Gentiles, reading "EWTjvae, and not "E\X7;vtT- TOQ. And that they were devout Gentiles is further evident from the phrase, that, on the preaching of the men of Cyprus and Cyrene, they are said " to turn unto the Lord," they having been turned unto God already. However correct and ingenious this system of Lord Barring- ton may be, and the opinion of the majority of commentators, Nv ho justly suppose that the abstaining from the four things was madt! to conciliate the Jews to their newly adopted brethren of the Gentiles ; it appears to me highly probable, that a more spi- ritual meaning also may have been intended in the prohibition. It may be that the apostle had a higher object in view, by insti- tuting these four laws for their Gentile converts, and that these enactments contain a complete summary of Christian doctrine and practice. The prohibition against idolatry does not seem to me to have been designed to forbid the mere oftering of idolatrous worship to images of wood and stone; but to condemn also the indul- gence of those vices which were sanctioned by the heathens, who had appointed a god or a goddess as the presiding patron of every vice. The prohibition to eat the blood of the animal that was per- mitted to be used for food, might not have been designed only against luxury; as Delaney imagines ; nor to prevent certain idolatrous practices, as Spencer and Young have represented. It is well known, that the blood of the animal that was to be ofl'ered in sacrifice, and afterwards eaten by the worshipper, was poured out at the foot of the altar. Blood was an emblem of natural life ; as the blood was poured out at the altar, so was it necessary that he w ho would approach to God with accept- ance, must sacrifice the inferior and animal nature, and offer unto God aspiritual homage. The blood aptly typified also that divine sacrifice, wh(»se blood was poured out, and who gave his life as a sacrifice for many ; and thusthe meaning of the prohibi- ' tion to ablain from blood would be, " Remember Him who shed his blood for you, and die unto the world, with its atfections and lusts, drawing near to God with a pure and contrite heart." The abstaining from things strangled might have had a simi- lar meaning. In these the blood was not poured out, and the •acrincc could not be accepted. This still declared, that with- out the shedding ol blood there is no remission of sin — that tlie sacrifice ofllcsh is required of all of us that we may become new t reatures. The last command to abstain from impurity, requires no ob- servation. 1 am confirmed in this view of the meaning of the apostohc decree, by the consideration that all the rites and ceremonies of • he Mosaic law had a spiritual as well as a typical signification. 'I'hey were designed to keep the Jews as a distinct people, and to serve as a wall or partition between the Gentiles and thcm- •x'lves; but they all afiorded likewise a moral instruction, and thus brranir the schoolmaster to bring them to the Christ, who was J" ronir : in i|,c same way these enactments might have been lormcd to mlbrce the remembrance of that Messiah who had now appeared, and was exalted to the right band of God. PAUL AND BARNABAS go dp to JERUSALEM— CHAP. XI. 185 Julian Pe- to Antioch, with Paul and Barnabas; namely Judas sur- Jerusalem. riod,4760. VulgariEra, 49. It cannot be necessary to stop here to refute the conjecture ofBently, that instead of Tropvtcaf, in this passage, we should read xotpfiac, as this emendation is unsupported by the autho- rity of any manuscript. Neither does the interpretation of the word TTopveia, by Michaelis, who refers it to flesh offered to idols, and sold in the shambles, appear worthy of farther notice. Dr. Delaney has endeavoured to prove that the prohibition to eat blood is still binding upon the Churches of Christ ; and Dr. A. Clarke has embraced his opinion. I cannot say their reason- ing appears to be conclusive. The arguments of Dr. Hammond, Dean Graves, &c. &c. appear much more supported— that the prohibition has ceased upon this principle, that laws are no longer binding, when the reasons for their enactment cease to exist. If at some future day, when it shall please God to bring about the accomplishment of his prophecies, and receive the Jews into his Church again, the eating of blood and of things strangled shall prove a stumbling-block to the converts, it will then perhaps, and not before that time, become the duty of Christians to obey the decree of the apostolic council. Grotius(/) asserts that the converts were bound to abstain from blood, because it was so ordained to all the sons of Noah. He quotes from Tertullian, that the Emperor Leo considered it unwholesome, and prohibited it by an edict. He further argues, that the observance of a command so easy, was not liable to the charge of superstition, and that the eating blood made men fierce and savage. He then endeavours to prove that the Christians were not commanded to abstain from blood, merely lest the Jews should be offended, which he would prove from the fact, that the con- verts abstained from blood, where no Jews were present, a cir- cumstance which rests upon the authority of Eusebius and Ter- tullian. Grotius proceeds to demonstrate this point from the • apostolical constitutions. Dorschaeus replies to these assertions, that the precepts of Noah obliged only the Proselytes of the Gate — that it is even doubtful if these precepts are other than a Rabbinical tradition — it is doubtful if all the precepts of Adam and Noah were bind- ing on mankind in general. He asserts, it is not true that Christ took nothing from the precepts of Adam and Noah, and only added to them new precepts. He then invalidates the authority of Tertullian, and the Emperor Leo ; and in reply to the two last observes, that the facility of obedience is no crite- rion of the reasonableness of a command, and ridicules the opi- nion, that eating blood in a state prepared by cookery can be injurious. Dorschaeus then attempts to shew that it was by no means an universal opinion among Christians, that they were to abstain from blood, and refuses to depend on arguments drawn exclu- sively from the apostolical constitutions. Witsius has sliown, in his discussion on the council at Jerusa- lem, that the more rcllccting Jews believed that the pious among the heathen might bo t>avcd without circumcision. And he ob- serves, that the discussion at the Council of Jerusalem does not weaken the claim of the apostles to inspiration. They were unanimous, but it was necessary to satisfy the consciences of their converts. (a) See Homer Odyss. V 4T0, ami N 26. Virg. Eel. 3. 77, &c. &c. {ft) Horn. Odyss. 18. v. 25. — Schoetgcii, Horan Hebr. vol. i. p. 461, •juotcs— Apicius dc artt cocjuin, 1. viii, c. 8.— See too Tacit. Anoal. xii. 1S6 PAUL AND BARNABAS return to ANTIOCH—CHAP. XI. Julian Pe- named Barsabas, and Silas, chief men among the bre- Jerusalem. riod, 4T60. ^.j^j.^^ . 49. ^'^'^ ^^' 23 And they wrote letters by them after this manner, The apostles, and elders, and brethren, send greeting unto the brethren which are of the Gentiles in Antioch, and Syria, and Cilicia : 24 Forasmuch as we have heard, that certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subvert- ing your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law : to whom we gave no such commandment : 25 It seemed good unto us, being assembled with one accord, to send chosen men unto you, with our beloved Barnabas and Paul. 26 Men that have hazarded their lives for the name of our Lord Jesus Christ. 27 We have sent therefore Judas and Silas, who shall also tell you the same things by mouth. 28 For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things : 29 That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornica- tion : from which, if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well. SECTION XIV. St. Paul and Barnabas return to the Church at Antioch^ with the Decree of the Church at Jerusalem^ on the sub- ject of the necessity of Circumcision. ACTS XV. 30 — 35. 30 So when they were dismissed, they came to An- Antioch. tioch : and when they had gathered the multitude to- gether, they delivered the epistle : 31 Which when they had read, they rejoiced for the consolation. 32 And Judas and Silas, being prophets"' also them- 47. The instance of Cataline's practical alhision to customs of this nature is well known, (t) See Reland's Sacred Antiquities of the Hebrews, (rf) De Bell. Judaic, lib, vii. cap. iii. sect. iii. (e) Grotius in proleg. ad Luc. (/) In the Treatise de Sanguine, et Suflbcato, of J. Geo. Dorschaeus, ap. Critici Sacri, vol. xiii. p. 451 — 460. Spencer de legib. Hebrasor. — Delanej's Treatise in Revelation examined with candour. ■ — Young's Religion, designed to prevent superstition, 2 vols. 8vo. — Harrington's Miscellanea Sacra. — Witsius de vita Pauli Melctem. — Leidens cap. iv. sect. iv. and vi. ^1 The chapter of this arrangement of the New Testament, which we have now concluded, contains an account of the first preaching; of the Gospel to the Gentiles by St. Paul, who was miraculously elected from his brethren for that particular pur- pose. In the former stages of the infant Church, we have hither- to found that an authority was exercised bv one instructor over PAUL AND BARNABAS betcbn to ANTIOCH-CHAP.XI. 187 Julian Pe- selves, exhorted the brethren with many words, and con- Antioolu riod, Aim. firmed them. Vulgar^ra, — ^^' another, and that the higher order possessed powers which were not enjoyed by the lower. The Gentile Churches were princi- pally ibunded by the apostle St. Paul ; and the question there- fore respecting the constitution of these Churches divides itself into several branches, first, whether any, or what control was exercised by the apostle himself over the Churches m general under his jurisdiction ; and secondly, whether there are any proofs that he delegated to others the powers he had himself exerted. These points appear to be at once decided by two passage of Scripture, the one Acts xiv 23 where we read that the apostles Barnabas and Saul ordained them elders in every Church: and the other in Titus i. and v. where St. Paul tells Titus-" I left thee in Crete, that thou shouldest ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee j» and he then proceeds to descant on the necessary qualifications of hira, on whom the honour of ordination should be conferred. The Church at this time was one Society, and it was subject throughout to the superintendence of the apostles. The apostles at Jerusalem till this time took care to super- intend all the converts : they commissioned Barnabas to go as far as Antioch, where the greatest number of proselytes were assembled. He obeyed, and visited the several Churches as far as Antioch, and confirmed the converts in their taith. Ibe account of his mission is so briefly related, that we are inform, ed only in the most general terms of the mannerin which he exerted his authority. But this instance proves that the apos- tles possessed the right of superintendence over th^ Churches out of Judea, as well as those in their own country, or they could have had no authority to send one of their number to the Church ot Antioch. , . *^ t , j«o The title " Prophets," which is given in this passage to Judas and Silas, and is applied to a class of teachers interior to the apostles, naturally leads us to inquire concerning the nature of the gifts that were imparted to the Church at this time, as well as the consequent gradations in the ministry which those gifts were intended to produce. , .«, j j j- Even in the bestowment of these holy gifts an order and dis- Unction was observed, which clearly points out a distinct gra- dation of rank in ecclesiastical government. We will begin with the apostles, who were distinguished above all the others by the most excellent gifts and powers; next to ^^'om ^^^e placed the prophets, who were inspired men, foretod luture events, and were also preachers of the Gospel: while others, from the portion of grace they had received, necessarily were considered of subordinate rank. . . ^, ,„„.«rur«v; There is ever an harmonious uniformity in the plans ol provi- dence, enforcing the same divine truths. , . ., MJ - As at the first settling of the Church of Israel in the wilder- ness (says the deeply learned Lightfoot), ^\'\y'%'\^}Zi^^^^ settling of the Gospel. The first fathers of the banhedrim in the wilderness were endued with divine g'^ts, such as we are speaking of; but when that generation was expired, those that were to succeed in that function and employment, were such as were qualified for it by education, study, and parts acquired. So was it with this first age of the Gospel, and the ages succeed- ing. At the first dispersing of the Gospel, it was absolutely needful that the first planters should be furnished with 5»ch ex- traordinary gift-s, or else it was not possible it should bo planted, 188 PAUL AND BARNABAS return to ANTIOCH— CHAP.XI. Julian Pe- 33 And after they had tarried there a space, they were Antioch. VafgaSk ^^^ S° ^" P^^^^ ^^^"^ '^^ brethren unto the apostles. 49. ' as may appear by a plain instance — Paul comes to a place where the Gospel had never come ; he stays a month or two, and begets a Church j and then he is to go his way, and to leave them. Who now, in this Church, is fit to be their minister? they being all alike but very children in the Gospel ; but Paul is directed by the Holy Ghost to lay his hands upon such and such of them ; and that bestows upon them the gift of tongues and prophesying ; and now they are able to be ministers, and to teach the congregation. But, after that generation, when the Gospel was settled in all the world, and committed to writing, and written to be read and studied, then was study of the Scrip- tures the way to enable men to unfold the Scriptures, and lit them to be ministers to instruct others ; and revelations and in- spirations neither needful nor safe to be looked after, nor hope- ful to be attained unto. And this was the reason why Paul, coming but newly out of Ephesus and Crete, when he could have ordained and qualified ministers with abilities by the im- position of his hands, would not do it, but left Timothy and Titus to ordain, though they could not bestow these gifts ; be- cause he knew the way that the Lord had appointed ministers thenceforward to be enabled for the ministry, not by extraordi- nary infusions of the Spirit, but b^ serious study of the Scrip- tures ; not by a miraculous, but by an ordinary ordination." 1. The apostles, then, were expressly chosen and appointed by our Lord himself. (John xx. 21. xvii. 18. Acts i. 24, 25.) 2. They had all seen Christ in the flesh, avroirrai, (Acts i. 8.) and so became witnesses of his resurrection. (1 Cor. xv. 5. 7.) 3. They were personally instructed by our Lord. (Lukexxiv. 45. John XX. 22. Acts xi. 4.) 4. They were infallible in their teaching. (John xiv. 26. and xvi. 13. Lukexii. 11, 12. Matt. x. 19,20.) 5. They were the common instructors of the world. (Matt. xxix. 19. Mark xvi. 15.) 6. They had the power of imparting to others the gifts of the Holy Spirit. (Acts viii.6, 7. 15. 17.) 7. They were endowed with miraculous powers. (Matt. x. 1. Actsiii.6.) 8. They had miraculous power to punish offenders. (Acts v. 8,9.) 9. Their wonderful success in their ministry was miraculous. (Acts xi. 41, &c.) In all these respects St. Paul was equal to either of the apos- tles. 1. He was called by Christ himself. (Gal. i. I.) 2. He saw Christ. (1 Cor. ix. 1.) 3. Was taught by Christ. (Gal. i. 12.) 4. Was infallible. (2 Cor. xiii. 3. 1 Thess. ii. 13. and iv. 8.) 5. Teacher of the world. (Acts ix. 5. I Tim.ii. 7.) 6. Imparted the Spirit. (Acts xix. 6. 1 Tim. iv. 14.) 7. Miraculous powers. (Acts xix. 11, 12. xxii. 9.) 8. Power to inflict punishment. (2 Cor. x. 3—6. Acts xiii. 8.) 9. And no apostle was more successful in his ministry. (Acts xxvi. 18. 1 Thess. xi. 5. Rom. xv. 17—19.) It is exceedingly diflicult to define with accuracy the precise powers of the miraculous gifts, and the exact titles of the minis- ters who were severally endowed with them, and the functions which they individually performed in the Church. Grotius, Vi- tringa, Lightfoot, and many others of the most learned, have PAUL AND BARNABAS return to ANTIOCH— CHAP. XI. 189 Julian Pe- 34 Notwithstanding, it pleased Silas to abide there still. Antioch. Vufgarira ^^ ^^"^ ^^^^ ^"^ Barnabas continued in Antioch, teach- 49. 'ing and preaching the word of the Lord, with many others also. discussed the subject, and have come to different conclusions. The principal theologian of later days, who has written on this part of the sacred narrative, is Lord Barrington, with whom Dr. Hales, with the exception of some trifling- ditt'erences of opinion, is generally agreed. The former has arranged the gifts of the Spirit, the offices of those persons on whom they were confirmed, and their differenft titles, in the following manner. 190 SPIRITUAL GIFTS, TITLES, AND OFFICES ~ 2 C» s s o c 2 3 •= 2 0) •"" rt uj ,Jad . 13« -a J 1 c 1 S o 15 VJ 1 ft 1 IP i o ■2 o 1 3 1 a s f o o - © Oj o .. M -» CL> /< P-cz; /< o> I- 1 «ji a> 1*1 u a fsg. 1 <1 b S < X fi- Q. 1 i-< e^* CO ■^ «o CO r-* r^-^.^^ i >-> 9 bo a bf) c > S o a. 1 1 d 2 "5 (« o en In O i ;C c *3 1 o i O o. -ST ■e- o g- 1 s ^ O b ^^ o 1 3 -2 "e a a X a u a, -*1 s s > yl b t '2 > '-5 1 3 ft- ;^ ^ ci CO tC* '6 tc r^ 00 H <^^^^ "o 'i- o en C £ 2 15 O bf) ^3 3 o O O 4) d •a c c u c O J-» u 3 .1- -5 c — ^.00 > — o 0) 2 Pi CO*- 2^ ^" — < c J= ■*-' 3 ^a o" 1 ^'1 1* Xi" ^« ^3 u - b «8~ 1 ^1 ^ ^ a. -2 .2 5 3 3,2 S " o 1, 1 ^2f sr •e- b 1.0 ^ 2 3 lif < b .^^ Q_ a .t; - ci W -rt 1'^- ^* r-' 00* (^ IN THE CHURCH OF ANTIOCH-CHAP. XI. 191 * .2 .2 "S rt ^ o.j'^ ^1 ^a^s .2^ S?S:^5 Shrill ^•i^^'H? fsg-g.'^! ^^1| 1-5=^ si's |'*:i^2>.|^^^'s« g^-'^lirS e^'^J s ?-.2 H'lHimi ! iff :;i^ii :l.a lit i1 2J^H^^§l^^|o'g^.2^.2°|S«-."S|s|; 192 ON THE GIFTS, TITLES, AND OFFICES Julian Pe« ^^' Hales objects in this arrangement of Lord Barrington, to Antioch. riod, 4760. the supposition that " helps" answer to " prophecy," and " go- VulgariEra, vernments" to " discerning of spirits." 49. Bishop Horsley has classed the gifts of the Spirit nearly in the same manner as Lord Barrington. He thus contrasts the nine gifts described in ver. 8—10. with the ecclesiastical offices enumerated here. GIFTS. 1. The word of wisdom 2. The word of knowledge 3. Faith 4. Miracles 5. Healing 6. Prophecies or predictions 7. Discerning of spirits 8. Tongues 9. Interpretation of tongues OFFICES. Apostles {i. c. expounders of the Scriptures of the Old Testament. Teachers of Christianity Workers of miracles Healers rdvTL\r]\piig, such as Helps ^ Mark, Tychicus, One- i. simus Governments, Kytipvijaug Gifted with tongues in vari- ous ways The fourth and fifth gifts, miracles and healing, seem, he ob- serves, to have changed places in the 9th and 10th verses. Mi- racles, it seems, must take place as the genus, and healing must rank below it as the species. Accordingly in ver. 28. miracles or powers are mentioned before healings, with this slight altera- tion, the list of gifts in ver. 8 — 10. seems to answer exactly to the list of offices in ver. 28. Dr. Doddridge and others, in consequence of the difficulty which has been experienced in the attempt to classify these gifts, have been of opinion that the same persons might have possessed many of them, and sustained several of these charac- ters, which were not stated distinct offices, and might be called helpers, in reference to their great dexterity and readiness to help those in distress ; and governments, in regard to that ge- nius for business, sagacity in judging the circumstances of affairs, and natural authority in the councils and resolutions of societies, which rendered them fit to preside on such occasions. This opinion is in some measure defended by Mr. Morgan, who has made the subjoined arrangement of the holy gifts, titles, and offices. OFFICE. Eph. iv. 11, 12. ("Knitting T C Saints. J P-by- ?oTth?bc^y??-P^ets "~ " t. 3 TITLES. Rom. xii. 6— S. 1 Cor. xii. 28—30, Apo-stles He that ruleth Pastors 3 Prophecy f^ He that exhorteth SHe that teacheth Deaconship C of Christ, Cworkof ^Evange- Deacons < the Minis. >- lists s «„ tv,,f „;• n, -v ncips ^try. ^Teachers ^SeSSsCeth mercy ^"teVters GIFTS. 1 Cor. xii. 8—10. r Word of wisdom < Miracles C Discerning of Spirits r Prophets r Word of knowledge ■J Gifts of healing < Healing C Speakers with tongues t Kinds of tongues V Teachers V Faith < Helps ■< Prophecies Apostles Miracles Governments Interpretation of tongues The writers in the Critici Sacri are very unsatisfactory on this subject. Though Lord Barrington appears to have given the best explanation, much light will be thrown on the meaning of the various gifts, if we endeavour to ascertain from the Sep- tuagint, the received signification of the words which are used to express them. This version was generally adopted during the apostolic age, and must have been well known by the persons to whom St. Paul addressed the Epistle in which these gifts are enumerated. IN THE CHliRCII OF ANTIOCH-^CHAP. XI. ig^ riod'47'co" ( 1 Cor ""Ji? 7" w ' ^'^'' enumoraled by St. Paul are nil described , ,. , VmI^o i^ ^ i^ '• ^'^ ^^y o"c term, ;^ avfpuj(Toj airoTg, which is the literal rendenngofDn^ ^n^^,, " I ^viFl reveal unto them.'' Our rans Jators have rendered the word " The manifestation of the Sp- rit. I cannot but believe that the full meaning of the wfmie passage ,s '' That to him who has been favoured with the m ?a oulousgills of the Holy Spirit, in whatever degree tl ey maJ have been imparted the power is also granted of manifesting to others the nature and extent of those gifts " ^ The whole clause of this passage in Jeremiah is onb ^-i^.,,, 12a °'.^^,^"'"^„^h.ch our translators have literally and justly [ruth "In wr'' ir""^ ""*^ *''^"^ *''^ abundance of peace ani ual nt w 1 / **'*^y «''V"PP«''ted by the authority oflhe Sep. tuagint; which however does not in all instances give the accu- rate meaning of the Hebrew. Dr. Blayney rejects the Hteral interpretation, and translates the passage - 1 will also gran their re7v';;;^'^P.r^-^"V''"l'^-" "^ ^^^^"^^ *^'^ renderrg'by'„'b- Hen P^;.!?^"^ '^"!f r ^"^ J'"^^ •" ^ ^''^^^"t, fervent manner. Hence n^M^ may well be construed a devout and fervent prayer • ot It. The learned author should have been fully warranted in "norsfffi'"'^^'''P^^^^ "^'"^^ ^"^^^' to grant^apiaje It passale in ^'"* ;" endeavouring to ascertain the meaning of a but wini •? r Pf ♦^'r'' '"r^"^ ''^'^^ ""'^y '^^ th^ possible sense ; If wo r J fift the hteral, and then the secondary meaning 11 ^e render he word n-iny by " fervent prayer," instead of abundance " we are still unwarranted in render ng the word Fvpn / ^^'"/'•f t'" ^hichis unsupported by any authorUy Even If we adopt Its usual primary meaning -I will reveal " and translate the rest of the passage as Dr. Blavney proposes we shal obtain only a probable signification. The prophet i' predicting the future prosperity of Jerusalem, aid itrtempora Ta ses'Is' uTu' \r' ^'"^'^^n' i^^""' *'''^ predictZhe passes as is usual, to a more spiritual promise, and prophecies the full manifestation of their devout prayer for peace and tmf^! in the latter days. Peace and truth were spidtual bless L of wh.ch the restoration of the Jews from their cap ivv^were KosYl'e'al uded ;""V-tive Neither is it imp?obab-le that ine apostle al uded to this prediction when he used the word tZV"-\\ ""'""^ .'' only found twice in the New Testamen7 [n ^.nn^F'f "' *° ''•" Corinthians, 1 Cor. xii. 7. 2 Cor Tv 2 \ the word nrnr^R''?'^'''" ""^ ^"^'^^^'^^ ^^' ^^^"^ "--"dering lators who U.. i^'i^'* supports the sense given by our trans- nirL^ ' ^t^'»o"Jd ever be remembered by the proposers of o^rvTrr/e^fnerage!"^^"^ ^'^ most emineni Hebr^ew^scholarl . Jllfn ^'k' ^'Yl''^' ^r *''"' i-epresented as bestowed for the nCor xiiT H^''^'"'' ""'r^^^' ""^^'' ^'"•^ general heads! (1 Cor. xu. 4-b.) and are then divided into ninu particulars The three general heads are— I'^nituiars. , fxaptfT^^rfrwv )diftercncesf of gifts r but the same Smr.f ^.aep..«,j^.a.o..a)v ^ or \ 'administrations r''%\'l' fc I Ivepyrifiarujv ) diversities I operations ( same God It'^freauemi! ''''^^ "'"^ \l ^l' ^^^^ Testament in this passage. vnT^"'"^ ""'"'"" *^^ Septuagint i„ the same sense in 194 SPIRITUAL GIFTS, TITLES, AND OFFICES Julian Pc- which our translators have rendered it. It corresponds with Antiocb. nod, 4760. the Hebrew words npbnD I Par. 24. 1. chap. xxvi. 1. 12. 19. VuJgar^Era, <' The divisions," or " classes," which would be possibly a bet- 49. ter word to express the meaning of the apostle than either "dif- ferences" or " diversities." The word x«p«'(Tjwa does not occur in the Septuagint. It is however derived from xapiroo/iai, which is frequently used. Its evident meaning- is a spiritual gift, or endowment of the mind, which could not he mistaken for the natural or cultivated talent of the teacher, upon whom it was conferred. — See Rom. i. 11. 2Cor. i. 11. AiaKovia does not occur in the Septuagint, but it is found in 1 Maccabees xi. 58. where it is used to describe the service or furniture which Antiochus sent to Jonathan the High Priest, for the service of the temple, in addition to the golden vessels — ctTrsffTeiXsv avrui %|0y(7w/iarrt Kai dinKoviav. Schleusner quotes from Athenaeus, lib. v. t. ii. p. 342. a passage in which diuKoviai is used to denote the instruments which are in daily use. In the New Testament the word is repeatedly used to describe the general office or ministry consigned by our Lord to the apostles and teachers of the Church. (Acts i. 17. xx. 24. xxi. 19. Rom. xi. 13.) The services they were commanded to per- form were the appointed means of grace, for the perpetual and common service of the Church. Evspy7]ixa is not to be found in the Old Testament, but in the Apocr3'pha only. Sir. xvi. 16. see Compl. It is derived from Ivtpyko), and is well translated by Macknight, In-workings — it is used but twice in the New Testament. Is it not possible as these in-workings are ascribed to God the Father, that they may mean both those ordinary influences which proceed from the holy Spirit of God, by which we alone can become the chil- dren of God, and say Abba, Father, and the right efiForts of rea- soning and the natural powers of the mind, which God as the Creator has implanted in all human beings. They appear to be different from the x«piCiLtara of the Spirit, and to be distin- guished from them. It will be observed that the various gifts which build up the Christian Church, though they are all called the gifts of the Spirit, are ascribed in their arrangement by St. Paul, to the three persons of the Holy Trinity. This is done, however, in such a manner, that the character under which each has been revealed lo mankind, is carefully preserved. The Father is the Creator of man, to Him is assigned the internal natural energy or operations which he originally implanted in the human cre- ation, or creature, and upon which, and with which the Spirit of God acts. The Son of God is the Redeemer; to him are ascribed the ministrations or offices which himself established as the appointed means of grace. The Spirit of God is the Sanctitier, to Him are assigned the gifts which produce holiness within, and convince the world of the truth of the Gospel, of righteousness, and judgment. And all these are rightly said to be the gifts of the Spirit, as it is the Spirit of God alone, which by its sacred office, overrules and changes the natural energies of will, understanding, and all the powers of mind which God has given us, and which makes all the means of grace appointed by Christ effectual ; and by pouring into the soul of man its own purifying, consoling, peaceful influences, makes us spiritually fit to become for ever the companions of superior beings. From this general classification of the gifts of the Holy Spirit, or of the Holy Trinity, we proceed to the particulars. The first is Xoyog ao(piaQ, which seems to have been peculiar to the apostles. The word (xo^ia is repeatedly used in the LXX. ii\ THE CHURCH AT ANTIOCII-CHAP. XII J95 Julian Pe- ft corresponds to no3, Prov. ii. 3. and iii. .0. understundini-- Ar.fiorf, nod. 4700. to ny-r, knowledge, Prov. i. 7. and lo nr^Dn, wisdom, Isu. xi. 2. Vuigar^ra, where^ (to0/« is described as one of those gifts of tbe Spirit which ^J. Should rest upon Christ. In the enumeration in the passage in Isaiah, are three words, which in various other passages of the lj.AA. are rendered by aocpia, nosn, nyn, ny-r, and which are in tbis place respectively rendered by the LXX (ro0i«, avve(ng, and yvuxTig This circumstance might appear at first sight to destroy toe validity ol any argument as to the meaning of the word (rocpiag irom the LXX, if we did not take into consideration the diffi- culty which the Septuagint translators unavoidably found in dis- covering a variety of phrases to express the synonymous terms in tbe Hebrew. Some further light may be thrown upon the meaning of the word r her to make in- quiry into Iheir future fortunes. It is expressly said, that " shr brought her musters much gain by soothsaying." The shewing 204 THE PYTHONESS DISPOSSESSED-CHAP. XIL Julian Pe- These men are the servants of the most high God, which Pbilippi. riod " - - - Vul 50. nod, 4761. shew unto us the way of salvation. VuIgariEra, ^ that it was possible for her, by long practice, to attain the art of speaking inwardly, would no ways dissuade persons from following her, so long as they retained a notion that she really prophesied. We will advance therefore one step further, and suppose that St. Paul, not only discovered her trick of speaking inwardly, but that he also argued against her being a diviner or prophetess, and plainly laid before them, that she usually made her answers in ambiguous and general terms ; that they much oftener proved false than true; and that it was owing to mere accident, if at any time there seemed to be truth in what she had said. If we judge of the experience we have of mankind, we cannot reasonably suppose that these arguments should immediately prevail with all the by-standers, or indeed any considerable part of them, to lay aside the opinion they had entertained of this woman's gift. However, we will sup- pose that all the by-standers were at once convinced of the truth and weight of the apostle's argument. Would they imme- diately be able to spread the same persuasion among all the in- habitants of Philippi ? And if all Philippi had believed her an impostor, might not her masters have sent her to another city, where by the practice of the same arts she might still have brought them much gain. The plain truth, therefore is, St. Paul prevented her future prophesying; or, if the word trick pleases better, he wholly disabled her from doing the trick any more. He cast out the spirit which spake within her, so that she was heard no more to speak as from her belly or breast. Her masters soon perceived that she was no longer inspired or possessed, that she could now utter no more divinations or pro- phecies ', and therefore all hope of their gains from her, whether in Philippi, or any other city, were wholly gone. After all, it is a dispute among learned men, whether she did speak inwardly, as from her belly or breast (a). They say the words do not necessarily imply this meaning, but only in gene- ral, that she was possessed of a spirit of divination, or fore- telling things to come. And they urge, that when she followed St. Paul, and said, '' These men are the servants of the most High God, which shew unto us the v.ay of salvation," she spake out with a loud and distinct voice. If this were the case, what trick had the woman, that St. Paul could discover to the people? Vid. WoltiiCur. in loc. Another thing, which demonstrates the absurdity of this in- terpretation, is the rage of the multitude against St. Paul. For no sooner had the masters of the girl accused him and Silas to the magistrates, but, it is said, " that the multitude rose up together against them," v. 22. Had he, as this interpretation supposes him to have done, convinced the whole city of Phi- lippi that this maid-servant was an impostor, and could foretel things future no more than any other person, no doubt they would have taken part with St. Paul, and not with the masters of the girl. They would have thought themselves obliged to him for having discovered the cheat, and preventing their U\. lure expense in needless and fruitless applications to one who could only amuse and deceive them, but not I'orctt 1 any thing future. If they were incensed against any person, it is natural to suppose it should have been against the girl and her masters, for having imposed upon them, and tricked them out of their money. But that they should lake part with the masters of THE PYTHONESS DISPOSSESSED-CHAP. XII. 205 Julian Pe- 18 And this did she many days. But Paul, being Philippi. Vufgar^ra, grieved, turned and said to the spirit, I command thee in 50. ' . . this impostor against the person who had discovered the fraud, is so contrary to all the experience we have of mankind, that it is a demonstration of the absurdity of this comment. On the other hand, if we take the story in the plain and literal sense, how natural is it, that the multitude of the city should side with the master, as being fully persuaded that it was not only a great piece of injustice done to them by the apostle, but a public injury of a very heinous nature; as they had hereby lost what they esteemed an oracle, to which they might apply upon all urgent and doubtful occasions. Nor is there any the least hint in the text of a change in the multitude, as though they had been first for St. Paul, and afterwards, by some secret ma- nagement, brought over to side with the masters. We may justly therefore conclude with the majority of com- mentators, and the concurrent testimony of the Church, that this also was a demoniacal possession, and being so, that it afforded another instance of the influence the evil spirit main- tained over mankind, till the power and mercy of the Saviour delivered us from the bondage and tyranny of the destroyer. The object of the evil spirit, in bearing testimony to the truth of the apostle's preaching, is well explained by a modern com- mentator. The evil spirit, he observes, well knew that the Jewish law abhorred all magic, incantations, magical rites, and dealings with familiar spirits ; he therefore bore what was in itself a true testimony to the apostles, that by it he might de- stroy their credit, and ruin their usefulness. The Jews, by this testimony, would be led at once to believe that the apostles were in compact with these demons; and that the miracles they wrought were done by the agency of these wicked spirits; and that the whole was the effect of magic : and this of course would harden their hearts against the preaching of the Gospel. The Gentiles again, when they saw that their own demon bore testimony to the apostles, would naturally consider that the whole was one system ; that they had nothing to learn, nothing to correct; and thus the preaching of the apostles must be use- less to them. In this situation, nothing could have saved the credit of the apostles, but their dispossessing this woman of her familiar spirit; and that in the most incontestable manner : for, what could have saved the credit of Moses, and Aaron, when the magicians of Egypt turned their rods into serpents, had not Aaron's devoured theirs? And what could have saved the credit of these apostles, but the casting out of this spirit of divination, with which, otherwise, both Jews and Gentiles would have believed them incompetent (6) ? (a) Probabilis taraeii est sententia Delingii Obss. sac. part 2. p. 201. Wolfiii curis ad h. 1. Walchius observes — Feminam illaiii, iyKa(Trpi[.ivO(i)Vy numero non esse adscribendaui, cum Lucas v. 17. verba distincte prolata ei tribuat, cum earn secutam esse dicat Paulum ejusqne comites, atque adeo per id signilicet eam per plateas et cur- sitando vaticinatam esse : eyya'^piixvOoi, vero vel insidentes cuidam loco vel prostrati in terra oracula sua ediderint V. Walchii Diss. 1. de servis etc. sect. 7. Kuinoel, vol. iv. p. .540. (6) See on the sub- ject of this note, Dickinson's Delphi Phicnicizantes — the beginning of Faber's Origin of Pagan Idolatry — the references in Kuinoel — Biscoe on the Acts, vol. i. p. 198, &c. — Whitby — Hammond — Dr. A. Clarke, and on the manner in which the Pythian Priestesses received their inspiration, the Treatise on Saul and the Witch of Endor, in die Critici Sacri. 206 THE JAILOR OF PIIITJPPI— CHAP. XII. Julian Pe- the name of Jesus Christ, to come out of her. And he PI»«J'PP» Vd'at^Ela ^^^^ ^"^ ^^^^ ^^^^ ^^°"^* 50. ^^' 19 And when her masters saw that the hope of their gains was gone, they caught Paul and Silas, and drew them into the market-place, unto the rulers, 20 And brought them to the magistrates, saying, These men, being Jews, do exceedingly trouble our city, 21 And teach customs which are not lawful for us to receive, neither to observe, being Romans. 22 And the multitude rose up together against them : and the magistrates rent off their clothes, and commanded to beat them. 23 And when they had laid many stripes upon them they cast thejn into prison, charging the jailor to keep them safely : 24) Who having received such a charge, thrust them into the inner prison, and made their feet fast in the stocks. 25 And at midnight Paul and Silas prayed, and sang praises unto God : and the prisoners heard them. 26 And suddenly there w^as a great earthquake, so that the foundations of the prison were shaken : and immedi- ately all the doors were opened, and every one's bands were loosed. 27 And the keeper of the prison awaking out of his sleep, and seeing the prison doors open, he drew out his sword, and would have killed himself, supposing that the prisoners had been fled. 28 But Paul cried with a loud voice, saying, Do thy- self no harm ; for we are all here. 29 Then he called for a light, and sprang in, and came trembling, and fell down before Paul and Silas ; 30 And brought them out, and said, Sirs, what must 1 do to be saved ? 31 And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house. 32 And they spake unto him the word of tlic Lord, and to all that were in his house. 33 And he took them the same hour of the niglu, and washed their stripes ; and was baptized, he and all liis, straightway. 34 And when he had brought them into his house, he set meat before them, and rejoiced, believing in God, with all his house. 35 And when it was day, the magistrates sent the Ser- jeants, saying, Let those men go. 30 And the keeper of the prison told this saying to Paul, The magistrates have sent to let you go : now therefore depart, and go in peace. 37 But Paul said unto them. They have beaten us ST. PAUL PROCEEDS TO TIIESSALONICA-CHAP. XII. 207 Julian Pe- openly uncondemned, being Romans, and have cast us Philippi. riod,4761. into prison: and now do they thrust us out privily? nay VulgariEra, ^^^.^^ ^^ ^^^ j^^. ^^^^^^ ^^^^ themselves, and fetch us out. 38 And the Serjeants told these words unto the magis- trates: and they feared, when they heard that they were Romans. 38 And they came and besought them, and brought ihem out, and desired them to depart out of the city. SECTION IX. ' From Philippi through Amphipolis, and Apollonia to Thes- salonica, where they are opposed by Jason. ACTS xvii. 1 — 10. 1 Now when they had passed through Amphipolis and Thessalo- Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where was a syna- "•«'*• gogue of the Jews : 2 And Paul, as his manner was, went in unto them, and three sabbath-days reasoned with them out of the Scriptures ^ 3 Opening and alleging, that Christ must needs have suffered, and risen again from the dead; and that this Jesus, whom 1 preach unto you, is Christ. . , t, , 4 And some of them believed, and consorted with Paul 9 This passage is generally quoted as one of those which prove the identity of the service of the primitive Church with that of the synagogue. In the instance of reading the Scrip- tures in both, the parallel certainly exists. This subject, however, having been already in some measure considered, I shall merely observe, in this place, that we never read that any one of the primitive Churches had such an oihcer as the Archisynagogus, or were governed by the ten the twenty-three, Scc^neither were the primitive Churches built by the side of rivers ; and many other points of dissimilarity might be shewn. . .. ^ a Some writers indeed have gone to the opposite extreme, and derived the principal customs which prevailed among the early Christians to the Heathen institutions established among them. The fact seems to be, that as the Jewish synagogues were ne- cessarily the first places of worship, very many useful customs were derived from the Jewish synagogue-service : and, as the number of the Gentile converts increased from the Heathen worship, some customs might be derived from them also. The Churches, in things indiflerent, were left to their own discre- tion • there was, however, a general similarity of worship, as well as an unity of faith, among all the primitive Churches. As at the Reformation, our Church-service was not formed upon the model of the service of the Romish Church ; yet our re- formers wisely retained whatever was useful ; so were many customs of the synagogues preserved. The worship of God was placed upon a right foundation : there was neither a servile de- ference paid to antiquity, neither was there any capricious, or useless, or jealous removal of ancient customs, merely because they were established. 208 THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS-CHAP. Xll. Julian Pe- and Silas ; and of the devout Greeks a great multitude, Tbessalo- v°f ' ^^^' ^"^ ^^ ^^^^ *^^"^^ women not a few. n»ca. 5l" ^^^ ''^^* 5 But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain lewd fellows of the baser sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people. 6 And when they found them not, they drew Jason and certain brethren unto the rulers of the city, crying, These that have turned the world upside down, are come hither also : 7 Whom Jason hath received : and these all do con- trary to the decrees of Cesar, saying that there is another king, one Jesus. 8 And they troubled the people, and the rulers of the city, when they heard these things. 9 And when they had taken security of Jason, and of the other, they let them go. SECTION X. St. Paul writes his Epistle to the Galatians, to iwove, in opposition to the Judaizing Teachers, that faith in Christy and not their imjoerfect obedience to the Ceremo- nial Law, was the cause of their salvation *°. § 1. GAL. i. 1 — 5. Paul vindicates his Apostleship, and salutes the Brethren. 1 Paul, an apostle, (not of men, neither by man, but '" Revelation is the language of heaven, spoken by the lips of men ; and no where through the volume of Scripture do we more legibly read its characters of light, than in the portion to which, we have now arrived, the Epistles of St. Paul. It is here that the discoveries are made which complete the perfection of the Christian dispensation. The preaching of Christ was past — the generation of witnesses who heard him speak " as man never spake," was rapidly dying away; the reign of the Holy Spirit had began, and the divine teaching was recalled to the minds of the Evangelists, and the deepest mysteries of God were impart- ed to the apostles. In the Gospels we read what Christ in his humility declared on earth, in the Epistles are recorded what Christ on his throne of glory spake through the Spirit from heaven. Why should it excite our surprise, therefore, that all those who passionately long, or serenely hope, for their eventual attainment of the promises of God, should be so much attached to this portion of their holy Revelation ; when others again, of a difi'ercnt character, who seem unable to appreciate their sub- lime excellencies, would altogether exclude them, as abounding with observations and directions which were primarily of a temporary nature only, and consequently, as they assert, irre- levant to the Christians of the present age. On this principle nearly the whole of our Scriptures may be rejected as use- less, for all the sacred books, either wholly, or in part, were tirst written to answer some temporary object, how- ever profitable they may have been for instruction, reproof, and doctrin(> to the Catholic Church for ever. Man is the THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS— CHAP. XII. 209 Julian Pe- by .Tesus Christ, and God the Fatlier, who raised him Thessalu- rioa47G^. from the dead ;) "■'^''• 51. same in all ages, and in all countries. However his customs and habits may did'er, the same principle of evil within him every where prevails — as the body is the same in one nation as in another, though the manner of his clothing and the ornaments of his dress may vary. It is to the principle within, " to the inner man," that the Scripture is addressed ; and if therefore we meet either in the Old or New Testament with any passages which refer to customs that are now obsolete, we may consider the appeal of inspiration as directed to the motives of action ; and we shall Ihen hnd that all Scripture is of universal applica- tion, and is written for our instruction in righteousness. It proceeds from the Father of Spirits, and is by him revealed to the spirit of man within him. Here it is that we are presented with a picture of the heart of man, and of the human nature with which we are born into the world, so faithful that when we look within us, we acknow- ledge its justice with indignation, with sorrow, or remorse ; yet so vivid, so animated in its colouring — its impression so pow- erful, that we never cease to remember the terrible portrait of ourselves, which is drawn by the inspired pencil. Here it is that the supernatural energy of inspiration triumphs. We may call in to our aid the flatteries of our self-love, and arm ourselves with speculations on the dignity of human na- ture, and the infinite, uncovenanted mercy of God — We may palliate vice, and endeavour to satisfy ourselves that the natu- ral or animal man may become a participator of a spiritual existence without change or repentance, or divine influence; if, however, we contemplate the likeness of ourselves as the character of the heart is drawn in these divine compositions, we shall deeply feel the absolute necessity of the same Spirit of God, which inspired these holy writers, to cleanse the thoughts of our hearts within us, that we may perfectly love and worthily magnify him. Here it is that we read in a clearer and fuller manner, than in any other part of the SMcred volume, the mysteries of the world to come — the nature of our I'uture ex- istence— the recesses of the human heart— the majesty of the Son of God — the intimate union which may be formed while we are still on earth between the human soul and God its Creator— and the unspeakable consolations which Christianity alone can afl'ord us in the prospect of death, and the hour of our most painful sufferings. It would be easy to detail these at great length : each of them appeals to the heart, as the angel Jeho- vah, when he followed our first parents in the recesses of tht; garden, and exclaimed, " Where art thou ?" In the devotional parts of St. Paul's Epistles, a voice from heaven, as the trum- pet of the archangel, seems to appeal to the Son of Man, where art thou ? what are thy employments ? to what world art thou going? The errors which distracted the Church in the apostolic age, are the same in principle as those which have always flourished^ and which are abundantly prevalent in our own day. Even now the advocates of natural religion, and the asserters of the power of human reason, like the Gnostics of the apostolic age, embarrass themselves and their readers with vain philosophy, and crude speculations on the existence of God, the nature of the soul, the origin of the world, or the eternity of matter. Antichristiau metaphysicians still deserve the censure of " pro- fane and vain babblings." The Greek, the Oriental, and Jewish VOL. II. P 210 THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS— CHAP. XII. Jnliao Pe- 2 And all the brethren which are with me, unto the Thessalo- riod. 4762. churclies of Galatia : «ica. VulgaryEra, 51. — — — — — - ■ — philosophy, united all their jargon to oppose a system of spiri- tual religion, which did not, and could not amalgamate with their metaphysical theories ; and every Deistical dream which has been since invented, is uniformly opposed to the same object. Revelation is the only guide to the reason of man ; when its bright light is obscured, or disregarded, man must always stumble on the dark mountains of error. Did the Gnostics " forbid to marry, and command to abstain from meats ?" The apostle, in condemning them, passes his censure upon those corrupters of Christianity, who still in the Church of Rome inculcate the same doctrines — Did any pro- fess to consider Christ as inferior to the Father ? The apostle is more especially urgent upon this fundamental point to enforce on the Church, that the Christ who took upon him our nature, is over all God blessed for ever — Did others maintain that Christ came into the world not to expiate tlie sins of man, or to ap- pease the wrath of an offended Deity, but only to communicate to the human race the long lost knowledge of the Supreme Being ? The Epistle to the Hebrews satisfied the ancient Church of the folly, absurdity, and wickedness of this wilful blindness, and condemns, in language which modern cour- tesy would shrink from as illiberal and bigoted, the pre- sumption of the German speculatist, and the blasphemy of the half-reasoning Unitarian. All metaphysical inventions which clash with the common-sense opinions which have originated in Scripture respecting God, the soul, the compound nature of man, the origin, continuance, and eventual conquest of evil, are alike condemned by the inspired Epistles. Among the various errors of the apostolic age which are cen- sured in their different compositions, we meet with no traces of that fatal error which has been reserved only for modern pre- sumption : we find no denial, of the miraculous evidences upon which Christianity is founded, or of the facts which it records, as the basis of the doctrines it enforces. This effort of the enemy oCtlie Church was reserved for the present critical and enlightened age, in which that reasoner is considered the most wise who departs farthest from the only true wisdom ; and bewildered in the clouds and mists of error, puts darkness for light, and light for darkness. If we turn to those subjects in which man may imagine himself to be more personally interested, as an immortal being, to the discoveries which it has pleased the Spirit of God to make to us by his apostles concerning the Saviour of the world, we might transcribe at great length the lofty titles and magnificent de- scriptions with which the inspired language of the apostles describe Him, who is the brightness of his Father's glory, and the express image of his person — the exact impression of his manner of existence— the image of the invisible God, in whom dwelleth the fulness of the Deity— who is highly exalted— at whose name all created things shall bow, whether in heaven or in earth; visible or invisible — the object of the worship of angels — the Judge of the world. He is here described as the one who was before all things: as the manifested Saviour, from the creation to the judgment. It is'in these Epistles that we are enabled in a greater degree to penetrate beyond the scaling of our own destiny. The distant throne, the sapphire blaze Where angels tremble while tliey ga/.e. THE EPISTLE TO THE G ALATIANS-CIIAP. XII. o|{ JiUian Pe- 3 Grace he to you, and peace, from God the Father, Tlicssalo- riod, 1702. and from our Lord Jesus Christ, "•^^• 5I4 — — In them we are confirmed in the belief of our own resurrec- tion—in the assurance that this corruptible must put on incor- ruption. They corroborate the events related in the Gospels, and are the most decisive evidences vye can possess of the rapid increase of Christianity. In thctn v»c hear, as it were, the angel of God declare, that " time shall be no more.'' We see the Sa- viour of the world resign his mediatorial kingdom to his Father, that God may be all in all — the harvest of the Church gathered in — the eternity that is past united to the eternity that is to come, and man made partaker of a heavenly and glorious im- mortality. With respect to the crime of dividing or disturbing the Churches, the apostolic Epistles every where abound with the most explicit injunctions on this point—" 1 beseech )'ou, bre- thren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there bo no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind, and in the same judgment: for it hath been declared unto nie, of you, my brethren, that there are contentions among you. Sub- rait to those that have the rule over you, for they watch for your souls, as those that must give an account;" with many other passages to the same purpose. Still farther ; there are various portions of the Epistles, which incootrovertibly relate to our own timesj and to times yet to arrive : those portions, namely, which are predictive. Of this description are the Epistle of St. Judc; a part of the second Epistle of St. Peter ; of St. Paul's second Epistle to the Thessalonians, and of both his Epistles to Timothy ; and of the Epistles of St. John. It is needless to name other passages, or to enlarge on those prophecies which have been specified ; for who will deny them to pertain to the faith and the practice of the present age ? We must not, however, regard the Epistles as communica- tions of religious doctrines not disclosed before: as displaying the perfection of a system, of which merely the rude elements had been indicated in the writings of the four Evangelists. The object of the Gospels seems supposed to be almost exclu- sively this : to prove, by a genuine narrative of miraculous facts, that Jesus Christ was the promised Redeemer ; and thus to lay ground for the belief of the doctrinal truths, which he should afterwards reveal by the Holy Ghost in the Epistles. Is this opinion, says a learned modern (a), consistent with antecedent probability? Does it appear a natural expecta- tion, that our blessed Redeemer, " in wljom dwelt all the fulness of the Godhead bodily," to whom the " Holy Ghost was given without measure," should restrict within such scanty limits his persona! communications of divine truths to his dis- ciples: that he should thus restrict such communications to his apostles during the whole period of his public ministry, before his crucifixion an