^^^^roTfmt^ ^^t'OtOCICAL St^ BS2825 .S126 Sadler, Michael Ferrebee, 1819-1895 Revelation of St. John the Divine BS2825 .S126 The Revelation of St. John the Divine Princeton Theological Seminary-Speer Library 1012 00081 8692 THE EEVELATION OF ST. JOHN THE DIVINE. GEORGE BELL & SONS, LONDON : YORK STREET, COVENT GARDEN, AND NEW YORK, 66, FIFTH AVENUE. CAMBRIDGE : DEIGHTON, BELL & CO. THE KEVELATION OF ST. JOHN THE DIVINE. WITH NOTES CRITICAL AND PRACTICAL. BY THE REV. M. F. SADLER, RECTOR OF HONITON AND PREBENDARY OF WELLS. SECOND EDITION, EEVI8ED. LONDON : GEORGE BELL AND SONS. 1894. CHISW'ICK TRESS :— CHARLES WltlTTINGUAM AND CO. TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON. IXTRODUCTION. WE must examine the authenticity of the Apocalypse in the same way as we have that of other books of the rest of the New Tefitament. The authenticity of any book which entitles it to form part of the Sacred Canon depends upon its recep- tion by the Church from the first. With respect to the book of the Revelation we have Justin Martyr (about a.d. 140) writing as follows : '* And further, there was a certain man with us whose name was John, one of the Apostles of Christ, who prophesied, by a Revelation that was made to him, that those who believed in our Christ should dwell a thousand years in Jerusalem, and that thereafter the general, and, in short, the eternal resurrection and judgment of all men should likewise take place " (" Dialogue with Trypho," sect. 81). Now it is very remarkable that this is the only place in which Justin mentions an Apostle by name. Through- out his works which are extant he constantly refers to the Apostles, and the companions of the Apostles, but does not name any one of them; and this is the solitary place in which he refers to an Apostle by name. The ecclesiastical memory of Justin Martyr must have reached to the times of St. John himself. If he was martyred — say in or about 150— he must have conversed with many middle- aged or old men who were contemporary with the Apostle in his later years ; so that it was impossible for him to have been mis- taken as to the authorship of a work attributed to the Apostle. Then we have Irenseus, about a.d. 170 or 180, that is, he lived within less than a century after the time to which early writers assign the date of the Apocalypse. I have now before me an index of his quotations from, or references to. Scripture, and from this I gather that he refers to the Apocalypse thirty-one times. I have examined each of these, and some of the results are as vi INTRODUCTION. follows. In by far the greater part of these places he not only refers to the book, but quotes it as the work of the Apostle John. "John also, the Lord's disciple, when beholding the sacerdotal and glorious advent of His kingdom, says in the Apocalypse, * I turned to see the voice that spake with me. And being turned, I saw seven golden candlesticks,' " &c. (Irenaeus, " Against Heresies," iv. 11). " On this account also does John declare in the Apocalypse, ' And his voice as the sound of many waters ' " (" Against Heresies," iv. 14). Again also, *' But when John could not endure the sight (for he says, 'I fell at his feet as dead,')," &c. (iv. 11). Also i. 26, " The character of these men is very plainly pointed out in the Apocalypse of John as teaching that it is a matter of indifference to practise adultery and to eat things sacrificed to idols. Where- fore the Word has also spoken of them thus : * This thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitanes, which I also hate.' " (Also v. 10, 2 ; iv. 20, 3 ; iii. 11, 8 ; iv. 20, 11 ; iv. 17, 5 ; V. 30, 2 ; iv. 18, 6 ; ii. 31, 3, &c.) But Irenaeus himself may be reckoned a contemporary of St. John, being acquainted with his (John's) disciple Polycarp : writing thus : *' But Polycarp also was not only instructed by Apostles, and conversed with many who had seen Christ, but was also by Apostles in Asia appointed Bishop of the Church in Smyrna, tvJiom I also saw in my early youth " (Irenaeus, " Against Heresies," iii. 3, 4). Melito, Bishop of Sardis about a.d. 171, is mentioned by Eusebius as having amongst many other works written one on the Revelation of St. John. Also Theophilus, Bishop of Antioch, as having written " against the heresy of Hermogenes," in which he makes use of testimony from the Revelation of St. John, be- sides certain other catechetical works. And speaking of ApoUo- nius, in the end of Cent, ii., Eusebius says, *' He quotes also the Revelation of John as testimony," TertuUian. — The references to the Apocalypse in the writings of TertuUian are exceedingly numerous. It will suffice to give three or four. Thus, " If thou doubtest this consider what the Spirit saith unto the churches. To the Ephesians he imputeth that they have left their first love: those of Thyatira he re- proacheth with fornication, and tbe eating of things sacrificed to idols. The Sardians, he accuseth of works not perfect," &c. (" On Penitence," chap, viii.) Again ('* Prescription against Heretics," INTRODUCTION. Vii :sxxiii.), " But John in the Bevelation is commanded to chastise ihem which eat things sacrificed to idols," &c. Also in " On the Crowns," xv., *' To him that overcometh, saith he, I will give a crown of life. . . . The angel also receiveth a crown of victory, going forth on a white horse to conquer. And another is adorned with a rainbow encircling him like a meadow in the heavens. The elders also sit wearing crowns," &c. Clement of Alexandria, " And although here upon earth he be not honoured with the first seat, he will sit down on the four-and- twenty thrones, judging the people, as St. John says in the Apoca- lypse " (" Miscellanies," vi. 13). Again, " The Apocalypse says also that the Lord Himself appeared wearing such a robe. It says also, *I saw the souls of those that had witnessed beneath the altar, and there was given to each a white robe " (*' Instructor," ii. 11). Again, " Thus the Lord Himself is called Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end" ("Miscellanies," vi. chap. 16). Origen, " Once more John, in teaching us the difference between what ought to be committed to writing and what not, declares that he heard seven thunders instructing him on certain matters, and for- bidding him to commit these words to writing " (" Against Celsus," Vi. chap. 6). Again, *' He will more worthily transfer all the saints from a temporal to an everlasting Gospel, according to the desig- nation employed by John in the Apocalypse, of 'an everlasting Gospel," (" De Principiis," iv. ch. 1). Cyprian, "Also in the Apocalypse, * And I saw in the right hand of God a book written within, and on the back, sealed with seven .seals.' " In an index to the Scripture passages quoted in Cyprian's works I find sixty-four references to the Kevelation. It seems useless to load pages with more instances of the Old Fathers quoting the Apocalypse as Scripture. The reader will find in Alford, and the " Speaker's Commentary," quotations from many others, as Hippolytus, Victorinus, Ephrem Syrus, Epipha- nius, Basil, Hilaiy of Poitiers, Athanasius, Gregory of Nyssa, Didymus, Ambrose, and Augustine. Altogether there is no book of the Bible which has more decisive testimony in its favour than this one. We have now to come to testimonies on the opposite side, those which impugn its authenticity — that it was not the work of the Apostle St. John. vni INTRODUCTION. The first of these was an obscure sect called the Alogi, whose principal characteristic was that they opposed the Montanists. They are not mentioned by Eusebius, and what we learn about them is from Epiphanius. In their zeal against Montanism they denied the existence of spiritual gifts in the Church, and rejected the Kevelation as being not the work of St. John, but of Cerinthus. But by far the most important testimony against the Eevelation is from Dionysius of Alexandria, about 240 a.d., described as the most influential as well as the ablest bishop of that age. Eusebius, who himself desired to show that the Apocalypse should not be considered the writing of John, the son of Zebedee, though he acknowledged its inspiration, gives a lengthened extract from: Dionysius as follows : " Some, indeed, before us, have set aside and have attempted to refute the whole book, criticizing every chapter,, and pronouncing it without sense and without reason. They say that it has a false title, for it is not a work of John. Nay, that it is not even a revelation, as it is covered with such a dense and thick veil of ignorance that not one of the Apostles and not one of the holy men, or those of the Church, could be its author. But that Cerinthus, the founder of the sect of the Cerinthians, so called from him, wishing to have reputable authority for his own fiction,, prefixed the title. For this is the doctrine of Cerinthus, that there will be an earthly reign of Christ ; and as he (Cerinthus) was a lover of the body, and altogether sensual in those things which he so eagerly craved, he dreamed that he would revel in the gratifica- tion of the sensual appetite, in eating and drinking and marrying. . . . For my part I would not venture to set this book (of the Eevelation) aside, as there are many brethren that value it much ; but having formed a conception of its subject as exceeding my capacity, I considered it also as containing a certain concealed and wonderful intimation in each particular. For though I do not understand, yet I suspect that some deeper sense is enveloped in the words, and these I do not measure and judge by my private reason ; but allowing more to faith, I have regarded them as toO' lofty to be comprehended by me, and those things tliat I do not understand I do not reject, but I wonder the more that I cannot comprehend." After this he examines (these are the words of Eusebius) the whole book of the Eevelation, and after proving that it is impos- sible that it should be understood according to the obvious and INTRODUCTION. ix literal sense, he proceeds, " The prophet, as I said, having com- pleted the whole prophecy, he pronounces those blessed that should observe it as also himself. ' For blessed,' says he, ' is he that keepeth the words of the prophecy of this book, and I John, who have seen and heard these things.' I do not therefore deny that he- was called John, and that this was the writing of one John, and I agree that it was the work, also, of some holy and inspired man. B