/,//, /S 
 
 ^ PRINCETON, N. J. "^ 
 
 Presented by We^xT. Gr-e'<:>\ C7\ , Ox^CTxr^ c\<7\ \ \ 
 
 Division 
 
 Section W... ..y!^^S^gff>'^ 
 
 'i^l5 
 
^fv-x-^ 
 
 •^^ *"j^«_-' *^,-+-^ 
 
 -*5fet& 
 
 
 a 
 
 rt-J 
 
 
 liitM 
 
 .6Crtv~JiIeL& 
 
 
 f/4, 7/m 
 
Digitized by the Internet Archive 
 
 in 2009 with funding from 
 
 Princeton Theological Seminary Library 
 
 http://www.archive.org/detaJls/analogyofrel1875butl 
 
THE \ , .A 
 
 JAN 1 1 1915 
 
 ANALOGY OF RELIGToff"^ 
 
 NATURAL AND REVEALED, 
 
 TO THE 
 
 CONSTITUTION AND COURSE OF NATURE. 
 
 TO WHICH ABE ADDED 
 
 TWO BRIEF DISSERTATIOxXS ON PERSONAL IDENTITY, 
 AND THE NATURE OF VIRTUE. 
 
 V 
 
 By JOSEPH BUTLER, LL.D., 
 
 LORD BISHOP OF DURHAM. 
 
 ••Ejus (Analogiae) haec vis est, vX id quod dubium est, ad aliqutd stmSe, dc 
 
 quo non quaeritur, refeiat, ut incerta certis probet." — 
 
 QuiNCT., Inst. Orat.^ i, i, c. 6. 
 
 WITH A LIFE OF THE AUTHOR, COPIOUS NOTES. 
 AND AN AMPLE INDEX. 
 
 TEE WHOLE EDITED BY 
 
 Rev. JOSEPH CUMMINGS, D.D., LL.D.. 
 
 PRESIDENT OP WESLEYAN JNIVBRSITY. 
 ^ . . ^ 
 
 NEW YORK: 
 PHILLIPS & HUNT. 
 
 CIN-CINNATI: 
 CRANSTON (k ST OWE. 
 
Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1878, by 
 
 NELSON <t PHILLIPS, 
 In the Olficu u/ the Librarian of Congress at Washington. 
 
EDITOR'S PREFACE. 
 
 IN preparing this edition of Butler's Analogy the 
 Editor has endeavored to adapt it to Students, 
 and to render, in a simple and concise form, the aid 
 they need. 
 
 The marginal titles, presenting the subjects of the 
 paragraphs, and constituting an analysis of the sev- 
 eral chapters, are an important part of his work. 
 
 He has given much attention to the text, which, 
 with a few corrections obviously necessary, is that 
 of the second edition, prepared by the Right Rev. 
 William Fitzgerald, D.D., Lord Bishop of Cork, 
 Cloyne, and Ross, published in London in i860. 
 Dr. Fitzgerald has given a collation of Butler's first 
 edition of his work, which is a literary curiosity, and 
 shows the singular pains he took with his style, in 
 which he has commonly been censured for care- 
 lessness. 
 
 The Editor of this edition has taken the liberty to 
 break up several long paragraphs into two or more, 
 in ordei that their meaning may more readily be 
 apprehended. 
 
 The Index has been made very full and complete. 
 
4 Editor's Preface. 
 
 It will afford great help to those who may wish to 
 understand the work, or make occasional references 
 to the sentiments of the author. 
 
 The Editor has taken from other editions, and from 
 Dr. Chalmers, all the material he deemed of special 
 vaiue, and has added a few notes of his own. 
 
 He was led to prepare this edition with special 
 reference to the wants of Students in our higher in- 
 stitutions of learning, but he hopes it will be found 
 acceptable to Teachers, to Ministers, and to all others 
 who desire a thorough acquaintance with this great 
 work. 
 
 The Biographical Sketch was written by Professor 
 Henry Rogers, author of " The Eclipse of Faith," 
 " The Supernatural Origin of the Bible," etc. It 
 was prepared for the " Encyclopaedia Britannica." 
 The same sketch is prefaced to the excellent edition 
 prepared by Rev. J. T. Champlin, D.D. 
 
 *:(.* All the Notes except the Author's are inclosed in brackets. 
 Dr. Fitzgerald is the author of the notes signed " F.** 
 
 MiDDLETOWN, May, 1875. 
 
SKETCH OF JOSEPH BUTLER. 
 
 JOSEPH BUTLER, Bishop of Durham— one of the 
 most profound and original thinkers this or any other 
 country ever produced — well deserves a place among 
 the dii majores of English philosophy, with Bacon, 
 Newton, and Locke. 
 
 The following brief sketch will comprise an outline 
 of his life and character, some remarks on the pecul- 
 iarity of his genius, and an estimate of his principal 
 writings. 
 
 He was born at Wantage, in Berkshire, May i8, 1692., 
 His father, Thomas Butler, had been a linen-draper in 
 that town, but before the birth of Joseph, who was the 
 youngest of a family of eight, had relinquished business. 
 He continued to reside at Wantage, however, at a 
 house called the Priory, which is still shown to the 
 curious visitor. 
 
 Young Butler received his first instructions from the 
 Rev. Philip Barton, a clergyman, and master of the 
 grammar school at Wantage. The father, who was a 
 Presbyterian, was anxious that his son, who early gavel 
 indications of capacity, should dedicate himself to the 
 ministry in his own communion, and sent him to a Dis- 
 senting academy at Gloucester, then kept by Mr. Samuel 
 Jones. " Jones," says Professor Fitzgerald with equal 
 truth and justice, " was a man of no mean ability or eru- 
 dition;" and adds, with honorable liberality, "could 
 number among his scholars many names that might 
 
6 AxALOGV OF Religion. 
 
 confer honor on any university in Christendoui."* He 
 instances among others Jeremiah Jones, the author 
 of tiie excellent work on the Canon; Seeker, after- 
 vard Archbishop of Canterbury ; and two of the most 
 iearned, acute, and candid apologists for Christkrity 
 England has produced — Nathaniel Lardner and Samuel 
 'Thandler. 
 
 The academy was shortly afterward removed to 
 Tewkesbury. While yet there Butler first displayed his 
 extraordinary aptitude for metaphysical speculation in 
 
 jthe letters he sent to Clarke on two supposed flaws in 
 the reasoning of the recentlv published a priori demon- 
 strations; one respecting the proof of the Divine omni- 
 presence, and the other respecting the proof of the uni(y 
 of the ''necessarily existent Being." It is but just to 
 Clarke to say that his opponent subjequently surren- 
 dered both objections. Whether the capitulation be 
 judged strictly the result of logical necessity will de- 
 pend on the estimate formed of the value of Clarke's 
 proof of the truths in question — truths which are hap- 
 pily capable of being shown to be so, independently of 
 any such a priori metaphysical demonstration. In this 
 encounter, Butler showed his modesty not less than his 
 prowess. He was so afraid of being discovered, that he 
 em.ployed his friend Seeker to convey his letters to the 
 Gloucester post-office, and bring back the answers. 
 
 About this time he began to entertain doubts of the 
 propriety of adhering to his father's Presbyterian r pin- 
 ions, and, consequently, of entering the ministry of that 
 communion; doubts which at length terminated ir his 
 joining the Church of England. His father, seeing all 
 
 'opposition vain, at length consented to his repairing to 
 
 * Life of Butler, prefixed to Professor Fitzgerald's very valuable 
 edition of the Analooy, Dublin, 1849. The memoir is derived chiefly 
 from Mr. Bartlett's more copious " Life ;" it is very carefully compiled, 
 and is: frequently cited in the present article. . 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. 7 
 
 Oxford, where he was entered as a commoner of Onel 
 College, March 17, 17 14. Here he early formed an inti- 
 mate friendship with Mr. Edward Talbot, second son of 
 the Bishop of Durham, a connection to which his future 
 advancement was in a great degree owing. 
 
 The exact period at which Butler took orders is not 
 known, but it must have been before 171 7, as by that 
 date he was occasionally supplying Talbot's living, 
 at Hendred, near Wantage. In 17 18, at the age of 
 twenty-six, he was nominated preacher at the Rolls, on 
 the united recommendation of Talbot and Dr. Samuel 
 Clarke. 
 
 At this time the country was in a ferment. What is 
 called the "Bangorian Controversy," and which origin- 
 ated in a sermon of Bishop Hoadley, "On the Nature } 
 of Christ's Kingdom," (a discourse supposed to imperil 
 " all ecclesiastical authority,") was then raging. One 
 pamphlet which that voluminous controversy called 
 forth has been attributed to Butler. "The external 
 evidence, however, is," as Mr. Fitzgerald judges, " but 
 slight ; and the internal, for the negative, at least equal- 
 ly so." The writer says, " On the whole, I feel unable 
 to arrive at any positive decision on the subject." 
 Readers curious respecting it may consult Mr. Fitzger 
 aid's pages, where they will find a detail of the circum- 
 stances which led to the publication of the pamphlet, 
 and the evidence for and against its being attributed to 
 Butler. 
 
 In 1 72 1 Bishop Talbot presented Butler with the liv- 
 ing of Haughton, near Dorkington, and Seeker (who 
 had also relinquished nonconformity, and after some 
 considerable fluctuations in his religious views had at 
 length entered the Church) with that of Haughton-le- 
 Spring. In 1725 the same liberal patron transferred 
 Butler to the more lucrative benefice of Stanhope. 
 
 He retained his situation of preacher at the Rolls till 
 
8 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 the following year, (1726,) and before quitting it, pub- 
 lished the celebrated Fifteen Sermons delivered there ; 
 among the most profound and original discourses v-hich 
 philosophical theologian ever gave to the world As 
 these could have been but a portion of those he preached 
 at the Rolls, it has often been asked what could become 
 of the remainder? We agree with Mr. Fitzgerald in 
 thinking that the substance of many was afterward 
 worked into the Analogy. That many of them were 
 equally important with the Fifteen may be inferred 
 from Butler's declaration in the preface, that the selec- 
 tion of these had been determined by "circumstances 
 in a great measure accidental." At his death, Butler 
 desired his manuscripts to be destroyed ; this he would 
 hardly have done, had he not already rifled their chief 
 treasures for his great work. Let us hope so, at al' 
 events; for it would be provoking to think that dis- 
 courses of equal value with the Fifteen had been wan- 
 tonly committed to the flames. 
 
 After resigning his preachership at the Rolls, he re- 
 tired to Stanhope, and gave himself up to study and the 
 duties of a parish priest. All that could be gleaned of 
 his habits and mode of life there has been preserved by 
 the present Bishop of Exeter, his successor in the living 
 of Stanhope eighty years after, and it is little enough. 
 Tradition said that " Rector Butler rode a black pony, 
 and always rode very fast ; that he was loved and re- 
 spected by all his parishioners ; that he lived very retired, 
 was very kind, and could not resist the importuniti^'s of 
 corni.ion beggars, who, knowing his infirmity, pursued 
 him so earnestly as sometimes to drive him back into his 
 liouse as his only escape." The last fact the bishop 
 reports doubtful ; but Butler's extreme benevolence is 
 not so. 
 
 In all probability, Butler in this seclusion was medi- 
 tating and digesting that great work on which his fame, 
 
SlvEtcit of Joseph Butler. 9 
 
 and what is better than fame, his usefulness, principally 
 rests, the Analogy. " In a similar retirement," says 
 Professor Fitzgerald, " The Ecclesiastical Polity of 
 Hooker, The Intellectual System of Cudworth, and The 
 Divine Legation of Warburton — records of genius 
 * which posterity will not willingly let die ' — were ripened 
 into maturity." Queen Caroline once asked Arch- 
 bishop Blackburne whether Butler was not "dead." 
 **No," said he, "but he is buriedy It was well for pos- 
 terity that he was thus, for awhile, entombed. 
 
 He remained in this meditative seclusion seven years. 
 At the end of this period, his friend Seeker, who thought 
 Butler's health and spirits were failing under excess of 
 solitude and study, succeeded in dragging him from his 
 retreat. Lord Chancellor Talbot, at Seeker's solicita- 
 tion, appointed him his chaplain in 1733, and in 1736 
 a prebendary of Rochester. In the same year. Queen 
 Caroline, who thought her Court derived as much luster 
 from philosophers and divines as from statesmen and 
 courtiers — who had been the delighted spectator of the 
 argumentative contests of Clarke and Berkeley, Hoadley 
 and Sherlock — appointed Butler clerk of the closet, and 
 commanded his " attendance every evening from seven 
 till nine." 
 
 It was in 1736 that the celebrated Analogy was ^^ub- 
 lished, and its great merits immediately attracted pub- 
 lic attention. It was perpetually in the hands of his 
 royal patroness, and passed through several editions 
 before the author's death. Its greatest praise is that it 
 has been almost universally read, and never answered. 
 " I am not aware," says Mr. Fitzgerald, " that any of 
 those whom it would have immediately concerned have 
 ever attempted a regular reply to the Analogy; but 
 particular parts of it have met with answers, and the 
 whole, as a whole, has been sometimes unfavoral)lv 
 criticised." Of its m^rit-, and precise position i 1 rcla- 
 
lo Analogy of Religion. 
 
 tion " to those whom it immediately concerns," we shall 
 speak presently. 
 
 Some strange criticisms on its general character in 
 Tholuck's Ve7'mischte Scriften^ showing a singular infe- 
 licity in missing Butler's true ^'' stand-punkt^'' as Tho- 
 luck's own countrymen would say, and rather unreason 
 ably complaining of obscurity, considering the quality 
 of German theologico-philosophical style in general, are 
 well disposed of by Professor Fitzgerald. (Pp. 47-50.) 
 
 About this time Butler had some correspondence 
 with Lord Kames, on the Bvidetices of Natural and Re- 
 vealed Religion. Kames requested a personal interview, 
 which Butler declined in a manner very characteristic 
 of his modesty and caution. It was, " on the score of 
 his natural diffidence and reserve, his being unaccus- 
 tomed to oral controversy, and his fear that the cause 
 of truth might thence suffer from the unskillfulness of 
 its advocate." 
 
 Hume was a kinsman of Lord Kames, and when pre- 
 paring his treatise of Human Natwe for the press, was 
 recommended by Lord Kames to get Butler's judgment 
 on it. " Your thoughts and mine," says Hume, " agree 
 with respect to Dr. Butler, and I should be glad to be 
 introduced to him." The interview, however, never 
 took place, nor was Butler's judgment obtained. One 
 cannot help speculating on the possible consequences 
 Would it have made any difference } 
 
 In the year 1737 Queen Caroline died, but on hei 
 death-bed recommended her favorite divine to her hus- 
 band's care. In 1738 Butler was accordingly made Bishop 
 of Bristol, in place of Dr. Goock, who was translated to 
 Norwich. This seems to ha/e been a politic stroke 
 of Walpole, " who probably thought," says Fitzgerald, 
 " that the ascetic rector of Stanhope was too unworldly 
 a person to care for the poverty of his preferment, 01 
 perceive the slight which it implied." In the reply, 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. i i 
 
 however, in which Butler expresses his sense of the 
 honor conferred, he shows that he understood the posi- 
 tion of matters very clearly. The hint he gave seems 
 to have had its effect, for in 1740 the king nominated 
 him to the vacant Deanery of St. Paul's, whereupon he 
 resigned Stanhope, which he had hitherto held in coj?i' 
 vietidam. The revenues of Bristol, the poorest see, did 
 not exceed ;^4oo. 
 
 A curious anecdote of Butler has been preserved by 
 his domestic chaplain, Dr. Tucker, afterward Dean of 
 Gloucester. He says : " His custom was, when at Bris- 
 tol, to walk for hours in his garden in the darkest night 
 which the time of year could afford, and I had fre- 
 quently the honor to attend him. After walking some 
 time, he would stop suddenly and ask the question, 
 ' What security is there against the insanity of individ- 
 uals.^ The physicians know of none, and as to divines 
 we have no data, either from Scripture or from reason, 
 to go upon in relation to this affair.' ' True, My Lord, 
 no man has a lease of his understanding any more than 
 of his life ; they are both in the hands of the Sovereign 
 Disposer of all things.* He would then take another 
 turn, and again stop short : * Why might not whole com- 
 munities and public bodies be seized with fits of insani- 
 ty, as well as individuals ? ' ' My Lord, I have never 
 considered the case, and can give no opinion concern- 
 ing it.' 'Nothing but this principle, that they are lia- 
 ble to insanity equally at least with private persons, can 
 account for the major part of those transactions of which 
 wc lead in history.* I thought little of that odd conceit 
 of Ihe bishop at that juncture ; but I own I could not 
 avoid thinking of it a great deal since, and applyir.rj 
 it to many cases." 
 
 In 1747, on the death of Archbishop Potter, it is said 
 that the primacy was offered to Butler, who declined it, 
 tvith the remark that " it is too late fgr me to try. to 
 
12 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 support a falling Church." If he really said so it must 
 have been in a moment of despondency, to which his 
 constitutional melancholy often disposed him. No such 
 feeling, at all events, prevented his accepting the bish- 
 opric of Durham in 1750, on the death of Dr. Edward 
 Chandler. About the time of his promotion to this dig- 
 nity he was engaged in a design for consolidating and 
 extending the Church of England in the American Col- 
 onies. With this object he drew up a plan marked by 
 his characteristic moderation and liberality ; the project, 
 however, came to nothing. 
 
 Soon after his translation to the see of Durham, But- 
 ler delivered and published his charge on the Use and 
 Importance of External Religion, which gave rise, in 
 conjunction with his erection of a " white marble cross " 
 over the communion table in his chapel at Bristol, and 
 one or two otjier slight circumstances, to the ridiculous 
 and malignant charge of popery ; a charge, as Mr. Fitz- 
 gerald observes, '* destitute of a shadow of positive evi- 
 dence, and contradicted by the whole tenor of Butler's 
 character, life, and writings." 
 
 The revenues from his see were lavishly expended in 
 the oupport of public and private charities,* while his 
 own mode of life was most simple and unostentatious. 
 Of the frugality of his table the following anecdote is 
 proof: "A friend of mine, since deceased, told me," 
 says the Rev. John Newton, " that when he was a young 
 man he once dined with the late Dr. Butler, at that 
 
 * Butler muit have been of a naturally munificent as >vc''l as benev- 
 olent aisposition. He was extremely fond, it appears, cf planning 
 and building; a passion not always very prudently indulged, or with- 
 out danger, in early days, of involving him in difficulties ; from which, 
 indeed, on one occasion Seeker's intervention saved him. He spent 
 large sums in improving his various residences. It was probably in 
 the indulgence of the love of ornamentation to which this passion led 
 that the " marble cross," and other imprudent symbols which were .-.o 
 idiculously adduced to support the charge of popery, originated. 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. 13 
 
 time Bishop of Durham; and, though the guest was 
 a man of fortune, and the interview by appointment, 
 the provision was no more than a joint of meat and a 
 pudding. The bishop apologized for his plain fare by 
 ssying that it was his way of living; 'that he had long 
 been disgusted with the fashionable expense of time and 
 money in entertainments, and was determined that it 
 should receive no countenance from his example.' " No 
 prebte ever owed less to politics for his elevation, or 
 took less part in them. If he was not " wafted to his 
 see of Durham," as Horace Walpole ludicrously said, 
 " on a cloud of metaphysics," he certainly was not car- 
 ried there by political intrigue or party maneuvers. He 
 was never known to speak in the House of Peers, though 
 constant in his attendance there. 
 
 He had not long enjoyed his new dignity before 
 symptoms of decay disclosed themselves. He repaired 
 to Bath in 1752, in the hope of recovering his health, 
 where he died, June 16, in the sixty-first year of his age. 
 
 His face was thin and pale, but singularly expressive 
 of placidity and benevolence. " His white hair," says 
 Hutchinson,* " hung gracefully on his shoulders, and 
 his whole figure was patriarchal." He was buried in the 
 cathedral of Bristol, where two monuments have been 
 erected to his memory. They record in suitable in- 
 scriptions (one in Latin by his chaplain. Dr. Foster, and 
 the other in English by the late Dr. Southey) his virtues 
 and genius. Though epitaphs, they speak no more than 
 simple truth. 
 
 A singular anecdote is recorded of his last moments. 
 A.S Mr. Fitzgerald observes, " it wants direct testimony," 
 but is in itself neither uninstructive nor incredible, for 
 a dying hour has often given strange vividness and in- 
 tensity to truths neither previously unknown nor unin- 
 fluential. It is generally given thus: "When Bishop 
 * l/isfo'y of Durham, vol. i, p. 57? : ^'i^^*'' '''' ritzgerald's " Life." 
 
14 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 Butler lay on his death-bed, he called for his chaplain 
 and said, ' Though I have endeavored to avoid sin, and 
 to please God to the utmost of my power ; yet, from the 
 consciousness of perpetual infirmities, I am still afiaid 
 to die.' 'My Lord,' said the chaplain, 'you have for- 
 gotten that Jesus Christ is a Saviour.' ' True,' was the 
 answer, ' but how shall I know that he is a Saviour for 
 me.'' ' 'My Lord, it is written. Him that cometh unto 
 me, I will in nowise cast out.' ' True,' said the bishop, 
 ' and I am surprised that though I have read that Script- 
 ure a thousand times over, I never felt its virtue till this 
 moment; and now I die happy.' " 
 
 The genius of Butler was almost equaLy distinguished 
 by subtilty and comprehensiveness, though the latter 
 quality was perhaps the most characteristic. In his 
 juvenile correspondence with Clarke — already referred 
 to — he displays an acuteness which, as Sir James Mack- 
 intosh observes, " neither himself nor any other ever 
 surpassed ;" an analytic skill, which, in earlier ages, 
 might easily have gained him a rank with the most re- 
 nowned of the schoolmen. But in his mature works, 
 though they are every-where characterized by subtle 
 thought, he manifests in combination with it qualities 
 yet more valuable : patient comprehensiveness in the 
 survey of complex evidence, a profound judgment and 
 a most judicial calmness in computing its several ele- 
 ments, and a singular constructive skill in combining the 
 materials of argument into a consistent logical fabric. 
 This "architectural power" of mind may be wholly or 
 nearly wanting, where the mere analytic faculty mziy 
 exist in much vigor. The latter may even be possessed 
 in vicious excess, resulting in little more than the dis- 
 integration of the subjects presented to its ingenuity. 
 Synthetically to reconstruct the complex unity, when 
 the task of analysis is completed, to assign the reci])ro- 
 cal relations and law ot sul)ordination of i^s various 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. 15 
 
 paits, requires something more. Many can take a watch 
 to pieces who would be sorely puzzled to put it together 
 again. 
 
 Butler possessed these powers of analysis and synthe- 
 sis in remarkable equipoise. What is more, he could 
 not only recombine, and present in symmetrical har- 
 mony, the elements of a complex unity when capable of 
 being subjected to an exact previous analysis — as in his 
 remarkable sketch of the Moral Constitution of Man — 
 but he had a wonderfully keen eye for detecting remote 
 analogies and subtle relations where the elements are 
 presented intermingled or in isolation, and insusceptible 
 of being presented as a single object of contemplation 
 previous to the attempt to combine them. This is the 
 case with the celebrated Analogy. In the Sermons on 
 Human Nature^ he comprehensively surveys that nature 
 2,^ 2l system ox cotistituiion j and after a careful analysis 
 of its principles, affections, and passions, views these 
 elements in combination, endeavors to reduce each of 
 these to' its place, assigns to them their relative impor- 
 tance, and deduces from the whole the law of subordi- 
 nation — which he finds in the MorabSupremacy of Con- 
 science, as a key-stone to the arch — the ruling principle 
 of the "Constitution." In the Analogy he gathers up 
 and combines, from a wide survey of scattered and dis- 
 jointed facts, those resemblances and relations on which 
 the argument is founded, and works them into one of 
 the most original and symmetrical logical creations '0 
 which human genius ever gave birth. The latter task 
 was by far the more gigantic of the two. To recur to 
 our previous illustration, Butler is here like one who 
 puts a watch together without being permitted to take 
 it to pieces — from the mere presentation of its disjointed 
 fragments. In the former case he resembled the physi- 
 ologist who has an entire animal to study and dissect- 
 in the latter he resembled Cuvier, constructing out o{ 
 
i6 Analogy of Religion 
 
 disjcLta membra — a bone scattered here and there — an 
 organized unity which man had never seen except in 
 isolated fragments. 
 
 All Butler's productions — even his briefest — display 
 much of this " architectonic " quality of mind ; in all he 
 not only evinces a keen analytic power in discerning 
 the ** differences," (one phase of the philosophic genius, 
 according to Bacon, and hardly the brightest,) but a still 
 higher power of detecting the " analogies " and *' resem- 
 blances of things," and thus of showing their relation 
 and subordination. These peculiarities make his writ- 
 ings difficult ; but it makes them profound, and it gives 
 them singular completeness. 
 
 It is not difficult to assign the precise sphere in which 
 Butler, with eminent gifts for abstract science in general, 
 felt most at home. Facts show us, not only that there 
 are peculiarities of mental structure which prompt men 
 to the pursuit of some of the great objects of thought and 
 speculation rather than others — peculiarities which cir- 
 cumstances may determine and education modify; but 
 which neither circumstances nor education can do more 
 than determine or modify; but that even in relation to 
 the very same subject of speculation, there are minute 
 and specific varieties of mind, which prompt men to ad- 
 dict themselves rather to this part of it than to that. 
 This was the case with Butler. Eminently fitted for the 
 prosecution of metaphysical science in general, it is al- 
 ways the philosophy of the moral fiature of man to which he 
 most naturally attaches himself, and on which he best 
 loves to expatiate. Neither Bacon nor Pascal ever re- 
 volved more deeply the phenomena of our moral nature, 
 or contemplated its inconsistencies, its intricacies, its 
 paradoxes, with a keener glance or more comprehensive 
 survey, or drew from such survey reflections more orig- 
 inal or instructive. As in reading Locke the young 
 metaphysician is perpetually startled by the palpable 
 
Sketch oi- Joseph Butler. 17 
 
 apparition, in distinct, sharply defined outline, of facts of 
 consciousness which he recognizes as having been par- 
 tially and dimly present to his mind before — though too 
 fugitive to fix, too vague to receive a name ; so in read- 
 ing Butler he is continually surprised by the statement 
 of moral facts and laws which he then first adequately 
 recognizes as true, and sees in distinct vision face to 
 face. It is not without reason that Sir James Mackin- 
 tosh says of the sermons preached at the Rolls, " That 
 in them Butler has taught truths more capable of being 
 exactly distinguished from the doctrines of his predeces- 
 sors, more satisfactorily established by him, more compre- 
 hensively applied to particulars, more rationally connect- 
 ed with each other, and therefore more worthy of the name 
 of discovery^ than any with which we are acquainted." 
 
 His special predilections for the sphere of speculation 
 we have mentioned are strikingly indicated in his choice 
 of \)ii& ground from which he proposes to survey the ques- 
 tions of morals. " There are two ways," says he, in the 
 preface to his three celebrated sermons on Human Na- 
 ture, " in which the subject of morals may be treated. 
 One begins inquiring into the abstract relations of 
 things ; the other from a matter of fact, namely, what 
 the particular nature of man is, its several parts, their 
 economy or constitution ; from whence it proceeds to 
 determine what course of life it is which is correspond- 
 ent to this whole nature." As might be expected, from 
 the tendencies of his mind, he selects his latter course. 
 
 The powers of observation in Butler must have been, 
 ia spite of his studious life and his remarkable habits 
 of abstraction, not much inferior to his keen faculty of 
 introspection, though this last was undoubtedly the 
 main instrument by which he traced so profoundly the 
 mysteries of our nature. There have doubtless been 
 other men, far less profound, who have had a more 
 quick and more vivid perception of the peculiarities 
 
i8 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 of character whicli discriminate individuals, or small 
 classes of men, (e\ incing after all, however, not so 
 much a knowledge of man as a knowledge of men j) 
 still the masterly manner in which Butler often sketch- 
 es even these, shows that he must have been a very 
 sagacious observer of those phenomena of human na- 
 ture which presented themselves from without^ as well 
 as of those which revealed themselves from wUhin. In 
 general, however, it is the characteristics of man^ the 
 generic phenomena of our nature, in all their complex- 
 ity and subtilty, that he best loves to investigate and 
 exhibit. The spirit of his profound philosophy is mean- 
 time worthy both of the Christian character and ample 
 intellect of him who excogitated it. It is the very re- 
 verse of that of the philosophical satirist or caricaturist ; 
 however severely just the foibles, the inconsistencies, 
 the corruptions of our nature, it is a philosophy every- 
 where compassionate, magnanimous, and philanthropic. 
 Its tone, indeed, like that of the philosophy of Pascal, 
 (though not shaded with the same deep melancholy,) is 
 entirely modulated by a profound conviction of the 
 frailty and ignorance of man, of the little we know com- 
 pared with what is to be known, and of the duty of 
 humility, modesty, and caution, in relation to all those 
 great problems of the universe, which tempt and exer- 
 cise man's ambitious speculations. His constant feeling 
 amid the beautiful and original reasonings of the Anal- 
 ogy^ is identical with that of Newton when, reverting at 
 the close of life to his sublime discoveries, he declared 
 he seemed only like a child who had been amusing him- 
 self with picking up a few shells on the margin of the 
 ocean of universal truth, while the infinite still lay ::n- 
 explored before him. In a word, it is the feeling, not 
 only oi Pascal and of Newton, but of all the profoundest 
 speculators of our race, whose grandest lesson from all 
 they learned was the vanishing ratio of man's knowledge 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. 19 
 
 to man's ignorance. Hence the immense value (if only 
 as a discipline) of a careful study of Butler's writings to 
 every youthful mind. They cannot but powerfully 
 tend to check presumption, and teach modesty and 
 self-distrust. 
 
 The feebleness of Butler's imagination was singularly 
 contrasted with the ifwentive and constructive qualities 
 of his intellect, and the facility with which he detected 
 and employed " analogies " in the way of argument. 
 He is, indeed, almost unique in this respect. Other 
 philosophic minds, (Bacon and Burke are illustrious ex- 
 amples,) which have possessed similar aptitudes for 
 " analogical " reasoning, have usually had quite suffi- 
 cient of the kindred activity of imagination to employ 
 " analogies " for the purpose of poetical illustration. If 
 Butler possessed this faculty by nature in any tolerable 
 measure, it must (as has been the case with some other 
 great thinkers) have been repressed and absorbed by 
 his habits of abstraction. His defect in this respect is, 
 in some respects, to be regretted, since unquestionably 
 the illustrations which imagination would have supplied 
 to argument, and the graces it would have imparted to 
 style, would have made his writings both more intelligi- 
 ble and more attractive. It is said that once, and once 
 only, "he courted the muses," having indited a solitary 
 "acrostic to a fair cousin " who for the first and, as it 
 seems, the only time, inspired him with the tender 
 passion. But, as one of his biographers says, we have 
 probably no great reason to lament the loss of this frag- 
 ment of his poetry. 
 
 Butler's composition is almost as destitute of wit as 
 of the graces of imagination. Yet is he by no means 
 \\ ithout that dry sort of humor which often accompanies 
 very vigorous 'ogic, and, indeed, is in some instances 
 inseparahje from it; for the neat detection of a soi)hisni, 
 or tlie sudden and unexpected exjjlosion of a fall.icy, 
 
20 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 produces much the same effect as: wit on those who are 
 capable of enjoying close and cogent reasoning. There 
 is also a kind of simple, grave, satirical pleasantry, with 
 which he sometimes states and refutes an objection, by 
 no means without its piquancy. 
 
 As to the complaint of obscurity, which has been so 
 oftei charged on Butler's style, it is difficult to see its 
 justice in the sense in which it has usually been preferred. 
 He is a difficult author, no doubt, but he is so from the 
 close packing of his thoughts, and their immense gener- 
 ality and comprehensiveness ; as also from what may be 
 called the breadth of his march, and from occasional 
 lateral excursions for the purpose of disposing of some 
 objection which he does not formally mention, but which 
 might harass his flank ; it certainly is not from inde- 
 terminate language or (ordinarily) involved construction. 
 All that is really required in the reader, capable of un- 
 derstanding him at all, is to do just what he does with 
 lyrical poetry, (if we may employ an old, and yet in this 
 one point not inapt comparison ;) he must read suffi- 
 ciently often to make all the transitions of thought fa- 
 miliar, he must let the mind dwell with patience on each 
 argument till its entire scope and bearing are properly 
 appreciated. Nothing certainly is wanting in the method 
 or arrangement of the thoughts, and the diction seems 
 to us selected with the utmost care and precision. In- 
 deed, as Professor Fitzgerald justly observes, a colla- 
 tion of the first with the subsequent editions of the 
 Analogy (the variations are given in Mr. Fitzgerald's 
 edition) will show, by the nature of the alterations, what 
 pains Butler bestowed on a point on which he is errone- 
 ously supposed to have been negligent. In subjects so 
 abstruse, and involving so much generality of expression, 
 the utmost difficulty must always be experienced in se- 
 lecting language which conveys neithe? inoi-e nor less 
 than what is intended; and this point Butler must liave 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. 21 
 
 labored immensely, it may be added successfully, since 
 he has at least produced works which have seldom giv- 
 en rise to disputes as to his meaning. Though he may 
 be difficult to be understood, few people complain of 
 his being liable to be w/junderstood. In short, it may 
 be doubted whether any man of so comprehensive a 
 mind, and dealing with su-ch abstract subjects, ever con- 
 densed the results of twenty years' meditations into so 
 small a compass with so little obscurity. No doubt 
 greater amplification would have made him more pleas- 
 ing, but it may be questioned whether the perusal of his 
 writings would have been so useful a discipline, and 
 whether the truths he has delivered would have fixed 
 themselves so indelibly as they now generally do in the 
 minds of all who diligently study him. It is the result 
 of the very activity of mind his writings stimulate and 
 demand. But, at any rate, if precision in the use of 
 language, and method and consecutiveness in the 
 thoughts, are sufficient to rebut the charge of obscurity, 
 Butler is not chargeable with the fault in the ordinary 
 sense. We must never forget what Whately in his 
 Rhetoric has so well illustrated — that perspicuity is a 
 " relative quality." To the intelligent, or those who are 
 willing to take sufficient pains to understand, Butler will 
 not seem chargeable with obscurity. The diction is 
 plain, downright Saxon-English, and the style, however 
 homely, has, as the writer just mentioned observes, the 
 great charm of transparent simplicity of purpose and 
 unaffected earnestness. 
 
 The immortal A?ialogy has probably done more to ?i- 
 lence the objections of infidelity than any other ever 
 written, from the earliest " apologies " downward. It 
 not only most critically met the spirit of unbelief in the 
 author's own day, but is equally adapted to meet that 
 which chiefly prevails in all time. In every age some of 
 Hie prin(:i],'al. perhaps ihe principal, objections to tlie 
 
22 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 Christian Revelation have been those which men's pre- 
 conceptions of the Divine character and administration— 
 of what God must be, and what God must do — have sug- 
 gested against certain facts in the sacred history, or cer- 
 tain doctrines it reveals. To show the objector then 
 (supposing him to be a theist, as nine tenths of all sucb 
 objectors have been) that the very same or similar dif» 
 Acuities are found in the structure of the universe and 
 the divine administration of it, is to wrest every suck 
 weapon completely from his hands, if he be a fair rea- 
 soner and remains a theist at all. He is bound by strict 
 logical obligation either to show that the parallel diffi- 
 culties do not exist, or to show how he can solve them, 
 while he cannot solve those of the Bible. In default of 
 doing either of these things, he ought either to renounce 
 all such objections to Christianity, or abandon theism al- 
 together. It is true, therefore, that though Butler leaves 
 the alternative of atheism open, he hardly leaves any oth- 
 er alternative to nine tenths of the theists who have ob- 
 jected to Christianity. 
 
 It has been sometimes said, by way of reproach, that 
 Butler does leave that door open ; that his work does not 
 confute the atheist. The answer is, that it is not its ob- 
 ject to confute atheism ; but it is equally true, that it 
 does not diminish by one grain any of the arguments 
 against it. It leaves the evidence for theism — every 
 particle of it — just where it was. Butler merely avails 
 himself of facts which exist, undeniably exist, (wheiher 
 men be atheists or theists,) to neutralize a certain class 
 of objections against Christianity. And, as the exhibi- 
 tion of such facts as form the pivot on which Butler's 
 argument turns does not impugn the truth of theism, but 
 leaves its conclusions, and the immense preponderance 
 and convergence of evidence which establish them, just 
 as they were, so it is equally true that Butler has suffi- 
 ciently guarded his argument from any perversion ; for 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. 23 
 
 example, in Part I, chap, vi, and Part II, chap. viii. He 
 has also, with his accustomed acuteness and judgment, 
 shown that, even on the principles of atheism itself, its 
 confident assumption that, if its principles be granted, 
 a future life, future happiness, future misery, is a 
 dream — cannot be depended on; for since men have 
 existed, they may again ; and if in a bad condition now, 
 in a worse hereafter. It is not, on such an hypothesis, 
 a whit more unaccountable that man's life should be re- 
 newcd or preserved, or perpetuated forever, than that 
 it should have been originated at all. On this point 
 he truly says, "That we are to live hereafter is just 
 as reconcilable with the scheme of atheism, and as 
 well to be accounted for by it, as that we are now 
 alive, is; and therefore nothing can be more absurd 
 than to argue from that scheme that there can be no 
 future state." 
 
 It has been also alleged that the analogy only ''''shifts 
 the difficulty from revealed to natural religion," and that 
 *' atheists might make use of the arguments, and have 
 done so. The answer is, not only (as just said) that the 
 arguments of Butler leave every particle of the evidence 
 for theism just where it was, and that he has sufficient- 
 ly guarded against all abuse of them ; but that \h^ facts, 
 of which it is so foolishly said that the atheist might 
 make ill use, had always been the very arguments which 
 he had used, and of which Butler only made a new and 
 beneficial application. The objections with which he 
 perplexes and baffles the deist, he did not give to the 
 atheist's armory ; he took them from thence merely to 
 make an unexpected and more legitimate use of them. 
 The atheist had never neglected such weapons, nor was 
 likely to do so, previous to Butler's adroit application of 
 them. The charge is ridiculous. As well might a man, 
 who had wrested a stiletto from an assassin to defend 
 himself, be accused of having put the weapon into the 
 
24 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 assassin's hands I It was there before ; he merely wrest- 
 ed it thence. It is just so with Butler. 
 
 Further, we cannot but think that the conclusiveness 
 of Butler's work as against its true object, The Deis.% 
 has often been underrated by many even of its genuine 
 admirers. Thus Dr. Chalmers, for instance, who gives 
 such glowing proofs of his admiration of the ^vock, and 
 expatiates in a congenial spirit on its merits, affirms 
 that " those overrate the power of analogy who look to it 
 for any very distinct or positive contribution to the Chris- 
 tian argument. To repel objections, in fact, is the great 
 service which analogy has rendered to the cause of Rev- 
 elation, and it is the ojily service which we seek for at 
 its hands."* This, abstractedly, is true; but in fact^ 
 considering t\\e position of the bulk of the objectors, that 
 they have been invincibly persuaded of the truth of 
 theism, and that their objections to Christianity have 
 been exclusively or chiefly of the kind dealt with in the 
 A?ialogy, the work is much more than an argumentum ad 
 hoininem; it is not simply of negative value. To such 
 objectors it logically establishes the truth of Christianity, 
 or it forces them to recede from theism, which the bulk 
 will not do. If a man says, "I am invincibly persuad- 
 ed of the truth of proposition A, but I cannot receive 
 proposition B, because objections a jS y are opposed to 
 it; if these were removed, my objections would cease;" 
 then, if you can show that a fi y equally apply to the 
 proposition A, his reception of which, he says, is based 
 on invincible evidence, you do really compel such a 
 man to believe that not only B may be true, but that it 
 is true, unless he be willing (which few in the parallel 
 case are) to abandon proposition A as well as B, This 
 is precisely the condition in which the majority of deists 
 have ever been, if we may judge from their writings. 
 It is usually the a /r/^r/' assumption, that certain facts 
 
 * Pr-clcctioirs an Rutlci', etc.. p. 7. 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. 25 
 
 In the history of the Bible, or some portions of its doc- 
 trine, are unworthy of the Deity, and incompatible with 
 his character or administration, that has chiefly excited 
 the incredulity of the deist ; far more than any dissatis- 
 faction with the positive evidence which substantiates 
 the Divine origin of Christianity. Neutralize these ob- 
 jections by showing that they are equally applicable to 
 what he declares he cannot relinquish — the doctrine of 
 theism — and you show him, if he has a particle of logical 
 sagacity, not only that Christianity may be true, but 
 that it is so ; and his only escape is by relapsing into 
 atheism, or resting his opposition on other objections of 
 a very feeble character in comparison, and which, prob- 
 ably, few would have ever been contented with alone; 
 for apart from these objections which Butler repels, the 
 historical evidence of Christianity — the evidence on be- 
 half of the integrity of its records, and the honesty and 
 sincerity of its founders, showing that they could not 
 have constructed such a system if they would, and would 
 not, supposing them impostors, if they could — is stronger 
 than that for any fact in history. 
 
 In consequence of this position of the argument, But- 
 le:>_, book, to large classes of objectors, though practi- 
 cally an argumeiitutn ad ho77iine7n, not only proves Chris- 
 tianity may be true, but in all logical fairness proves it 
 is so. This he himself, with his usual judgment, points 
 out. He says: "And objections, which are equally ap- 
 plicable to both natural and revealed religion, are. 
 properly speaking, answered by its being shown that 
 they are %o, provided the former be adf?titted to be true.** 
 
 The praise which Mackintosh bestowed on this great 
 work is alike worthy of it and himself. " Butler's great 
 work, though only a commentary on the singularly orig- 
 inal and pregnant passage of Origen, which is so honestly 
 prefixed to it as a motto, is, notwithstanding, the most 
 original and profound work extant in any language on 
 
26 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 the Philosophy of Religion^'' The favorite topics of 
 the Sermons are, of course, largely insisted on in the 
 Analogy: such as the 'ignorance of man;" the restric • 
 tions which the limitations of his nature and his position 
 in the universe should impose on his speculations ; hiu 
 subjection to "probability as the guide of life;" the 
 folly and presumption of pronouncing, a priori^ on the 
 character and conduct of the Divine Ruler from our 
 contracted point of view, and our glimpses of but a very 
 small segment of his universal plan. These topics 
 Butler enforces with a power not less admirable than 
 the sagacity with which he traces the analogies between 
 the " Constitution and Course of Nature," and the dis- 
 closures of '* Divine Revelation." These last, of course, 
 form the staple of the argument ; but to enforce the 
 proper deductions from them the above favorite topics 
 are absolutely essential. 
 
 It has been sometimes, though erroneously, surmised 
 that Butler was considerably indebted to preceding 
 writers. That in the progress of the long deistical con- 
 troversy many theologians should have caught glimpses 
 of the same line of argument, is not wonderful. The 
 constant iteration by the English deists of that same 
 class of difficulties to which the Analogy replies, could 
 not fail to lead to a partial perception of the powerful 
 instrument it was reserved for Butler effectually to wield. 
 It has been here as with almost every other great intel- 
 lectual achievement of man ; many minds have been 
 simultaneously engaged by the natural progress of events 
 about the same subject of thought; there have been 
 "coming shadows" and "vague anticipations," perhaps 
 
 * A far different and utteriy inconsistent judgment in all respects 
 is reported, in his " Life," to have fallen from him. But as Professor 
 Fitzgerald shows, it is so strangely, and, indeed, amusingly contrary 
 to the above, that it must have been founded on some mistake of 
 something that must have been said in conversation. 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. 27 
 
 even simultaneous inventions or discoveries ; and then 
 ensues much debate as to the true claimants. Thus it 
 was in relation to the calculus, the analysis of water, 
 the invention of the steam-engine, and the discovery of 
 Neptune. 
 
 In tlie present case, however, there can be no doubt 
 that the merit of the systematic construction of the en- 
 tire argument rests with Butler. Nor would it have much 
 detracted from his merit, even if he had derived far 
 larger fragments of the fabric from his contemporaries 
 tha'n we have any reason to believe he did. They 
 would have been but single stones ; the architectural 
 genius which brought them from their distant quarries 
 and polished them, and wrought them into a massive 
 evidence, was his alone. 
 
 Professor Fitzgerald has truly remarked, that the work 
 of Dr. James Foster against Tindal (an author Butler 
 evidently has constantly in his eye) presents some curi- 
 ous parallelisms with certain passages of the Analogy. We 
 have ourselves noted in Conybeare's reply to the same 
 infidel writer (published six years before the Analogy) 
 other parallelisms not less striking. But it seems quite 
 improbable that Butler should have derived aid from 
 any such sources, since his work was being excogitated 
 for many years before it was published ; nay, as we have 
 seen, it may be conjectured that he largely transfused 
 into it portions of the sermons delivered so long before 
 at the Rolls, and of which a far greater number must 
 have been preached than the fifteen he published ; so 
 that; perhaps, it is more near the truth to say that c )n- 
 temporary writers had been indebted to him than he to 
 them. 
 
 The " pregnant sentence " from Origen, however, is 
 not the only thing which may have suggested to Butler 
 his great work. Berkeley, in a long passage of tlie 
 "Minute Philosopher," cited by Mr, Fitzgerald, clearly 
 
28 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 lays down the principle on which such a work as the 
 Analogy might be constructed. 
 
 The spirit of the Analogy is admirable. Though em- 
 inently controversial in its origin and purpose; and 
 though the author must constantly have had the deistical 
 writers of the day in his eye, his work is calm and dig- 
 nified, and divested of every trace of the controversial 
 spirit. He does not even mention the names of the 
 men whose opinions he is refuting; and if their systems 
 had been merely some new minerals or aerolites dropped 
 upon the world from some unknown sphere, he could 
 not have analyzed them with less of passion. 
 
 Of Butler's ethical philosophy, as expounded especial- 
 ly in the Ser?nons on Human Nature^ Sir James Mackin- 
 tosh's remarks prefixed to this Encyclopaedia* super- 
 sede further notice in the present brief article. But it 
 ma]^ be remarked in general of the sermons preached at 
 the Rolls, that though not so much read (if we except, 
 perhaps, the three just mentioned) as the Aftalogy, they 
 are to the full as worthy of being read ; they deserve 
 all that is so strikingly said of them in the Preliminary 
 Dissertation. Some of them fill one with wonder at the 
 sagacity with which the moral paradoxes in human na- 
 ture are investigated and reconciled. Take, for exam- 
 ple, the sermon on Balaam. The first feeling in many 
 a mind on reading the history in the Old Testament is, 
 that man could not so act in the given circumstances. 
 We doubt if ever any man deeply pondered the sermon 
 of Butler, in which he dwells on the equally unaccount- 
 able phenomena of human conduct, less observed, in ■ 
 deed, only because more observable, and questioned 
 any longer man's powers of self-deception, even to such 
 feats of folly and wickedness as are recorded of the 
 prophet. 
 
 The editions of Butler's writings, separately or alto- 
 * Encyclopaedia Britannica. 
 
Sketch of Joseph Butler. 29 
 
 gether, have been numerous, and it is impossible within 
 the limits of this article to specify them, still less to do 
 justice to the literature which they have produced. His 
 commentators have been many and m^ost illustrious : 
 seldom has a man who wrote so little engaged so many 
 great minds to do him homage by becoming his expo- 
 nents and annotators. It may be permitted, however, to 
 mention with deserved honor the remarks of Sir James 
 Mackintosh, prefixed to this Encyclopaedia ; the " Pre- 
 lections " of Dr. Chalmers on the Analogy; the valuable 
 "Essay" of Dr. Hampden on the "Philosophical Evi- 
 dences of Christianity ;" some beautiful applications of 
 Butler's principle in Whately's " Essays on the Pecul- 
 iarities of Christianity;" and the admirable edition of 
 the Analogy by Professor Fitzgerald, which is enriched 
 by many very acute and judicious notes, and by a 
 coi)ious and valuable index. 
 
ADVERTISEMENT PREFIXED TO THE FIRST 
 
 EDITION. 
 
 IF the reader should meet here with any thing which 
 he had not before attended to, it will not be in 
 the observations upon the constitution and course of 
 nature, these being all obvious ; but in the application 
 of them : in which, though there is nothing but what 
 appears to me of some real weight, and therefore of 
 great importance, yet he will observe several things 
 which will appear to him of very little, if he can think 
 things to be of little importance which are of any real 
 weight at all upon such a subject as religion. How- 
 ever, the proper force of the following treatise lies in 
 the whole general analogy considered together. 
 
 It is come, I know not how, to be taken for granted, 
 by many persons, that Christianity is not so much a 
 subject of inquiry, but that it is now at length discov- 
 ered to be fictitious. And accordingly they treat it as 
 if, in the present age, this were an agreed point among 
 all people of discernment, and nothing remained but to 
 set it up as a principal subject of mirth and ridicule, as 
 it were, by way of reprisals for its having so long inter- 
 rupted the pleasures of the world. On the contrary, 
 thus much, at least, will be here found — not taken for 
 granted, but proved — that any reasonable man who will 
 thoroughly consider the matter may be as much assured 
 as he is of his own being, that it is not, however, so clear 
 a case that there is nothing in it. There is, I think, 
 strong evidence of its truth ; but it is certain no one 
 can, upon principles of reason, be satisfied of the con- 
 trary. And the practical consequence to be drawn from 
 this is not attended to by every one who is concerned in it. 
 
 J/.7V, 1736. 
 
CONTENTS. 
 
 Paoi 
 Sketch of Joseph Butler 5 
 
 Introduction 33 
 
 PART I. 
 
 OF NATURAL RELIGION. 
 
 Cbapteb 
 
 I. Of a Future Life 45 
 
 II. Of the Government of God by Rewards and Pun- 
 ishments, AND particularly OF THE LATTER 69 
 
 III. Of the Moral Government of God 84 
 
 IV. Of a State of Probation, as Implying Trial, Dif- 
 
 ficulties, and Danger 113 
 
 V. Of a State of Probation, as Intended for Moral 
 
 Discipline and Improvement 124 
 
 VI. Of the Opinion of Necessity, Considered as In- 
 fluencing Practice 152 
 
 VII. Of the Government of God, Considered as a 
 Scheme or Constitution, Imperfectly Compre- 
 hended 171 
 
 Conclusion i S^ 
 
32 Contents. 
 
 PART II. 
 OF REVEALED RELIGION 
 
 Chaptbb Paqi 
 
 I. Of the Importance of Christianity 191 
 
 II. Of the Supposed Presumption against a Revela- 
 tion, Considered as Miraculous 212 
 
 III. Of our Incapacity of Judging what were to be 
 Expected in a Revelation ; and the Credibility, 
 from Analogy, that it must Contain Things 
 Appearing Liable to Objections 222 
 
 IV. Of Christianity, Considered as a Scheme or Con- 
 stitution, Imperfectly Comprehended 240 
 
 V. Of the Particular System of Christianity ; the 
 Appointment of a Mediator, and the Redemp- 
 tion of the World by him 249 
 
 VI. Of the Want of Universality in Revelation; 
 and of the Supposed Deficiency in the Proof 
 
 OF it 271 
 
 VII. Of the Particular Evidence for Christianity.. 292 
 
 VIII. Of the Objections which may be made against 
 Arguing from the Analogy of Nature to Re- 
 ligion 333 
 
 Conclusion 347 
 
 DISSERTATIONS. 
 
 I. Of Personal Identity 357 
 
 II. Of the Nature of Virtue 365 
 
 Index 377 
 
INTRODUCTION. 
 
 PROBABLE Evidence is essentially distinguished 
 from Demonstrative by this, that it admits of de- 
 grees ; and of all variety of them, from the highest moral 
 certainty to the very lowest presumption. Difference be- 
 We cannot, indeed, say a thing is probably anrSeraSlSra^- 
 true upon one very slight presumption for ^^e Evidence, 
 it ; because, as there may be probabilities on both sides 
 of a question, there may be some against it ; and though 
 there be not, yet a slight presumption does not beget 
 that degree of conviction which is implied in saying a 
 thing is probably true. But that the slightest possible 
 presumption is of the nature of a probability appears 
 from hence — that such low presumption, often repeated, 
 will amount even to moral certainty. Thus a m'an's hav- 
 ing observed the ebb and flow of the tide to-day, affords 
 some sort of presumption, though the lowest imaginable, 
 that it may happen again to-morrow. But the observa- 
 tion of this event for so many days, and months, and 
 ages together, as it has been observed by mankind, gives 
 us a full assurance that it will. 
 
 2. That which chiefly constitutes Probability is ex- 
 pressed in the word likely, thaf is, like some truth * or 
 true event ; like it in itself, in its evidence, in Likeness con- 
 
 - - ., . , I stitutes Proba- 
 
 some more or fewer of its circumstances.! buity. 
 
 * Verisimile. 
 
 \ ['* Like it in itself," seems to indicate the case in which we have 
 oscertained the whole nature of the truth or known fact ; for example, 
 ascertained ihc whole of the conditions upon which a given conse- 
 
34 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 For when we determine a thing to be probably true— 
 suppose that an event has or will come to pass — it is 
 from the mind's remarking in it a likeness to some 
 other event which we have observed has come to pass. 
 A.nd this observation forms, in numberless daily ii - 
 stances, a presumption, opinion, or full conviction, that 
 such cent has or will come to pass ; according as the 
 observation is, that the like event has sometimes, most 
 commonly, or always, so far as our observation reaches, 
 come to pass at like distances of time, or place, or upon 
 like occasions. Hence arises the belief that 
 
 Illustrations. ,.,,...,. 
 
 a child, if It lives twenty years, will grow 
 up to 'the stature and strength of a man ; that food will 
 contribute to the prese "vation of its life, and the want 
 of it for such a number of days, be its certain destruc- 
 tion. So, likewise, the rule and measure of our hopes 
 and fears concerning the success of our pursuits ; our 
 expectations that others will act so and so in such cir- 
 cumstances ; and our judgment that such actions proceed 
 from such principles; — all these rely upon our having 
 observed the like, to what we hope, fear, expect, judge ; 
 I say upon our having observed the like, either with re- 
 spect to others or ourselves. And thus, whereas the 
 prince * who had always lived in a warm climate natu- 
 rally concluded, in the way of analogy, that there was no 
 such thing as water's becoming hard, because he had al- 
 ways observed it to be fluid and yielding ; — we, on the 
 contrary, from analogy, conclude that there is no pre- 
 sumption at all against this; that it is supposaMe Ihe'-c 
 
 quence takes place. This is the case of a strict induction. " Like m 
 its evidence," when the same testimony or proof which we have foLn'i 
 credible for some cases leads us to believe something else. " Like it 
 in some more or fewer of its circumstunces," refers to analogies, in tb« 
 popular sense of the term, as before explained. — F.] 
 
 * The story is told by Mr. Locke, in the chapter on Probability 
 Essay on he Human Understanding, book iv, chap, xv, § 5. 
 
Introduction. 35 
 
 may be frost in England any given day in Jaiiuary next 
 probable that there will on some day of the month ; ana 
 that there is a moral certainty, that is, ground for an 
 expectation, without any doubt of it, in some part or 
 other of the winter, 
 
 ^. Probable Evidence, in its very nature, affords but 
 an impel feet kind of information, and is to be consid- 
 ered as relative only to beings of limited probabiMty tte 
 ^apc* cities. For nothing which is the possi- speculation "and 
 ble object of knowledge, whether past, pres- ^'^°^^^- 
 ent, or future, can be probable to an Infinite Intelli- 
 gence; since it cannot but be discerned absolutely, as it 
 is in itself, certainly true or certainly false. But, to us, 
 probability is the very guide of life. 
 
 From these things it follows, that in questions of diffi- 
 culty, or such as are thought so, where more satisfactory 
 evidence cannot be had, or is not seen, if the result of 
 examination be, that there appears, upon the whole, any, 
 even the lowest, presumption on one side, and none on the 
 other, or a greater presumption on one side, though in 
 the lowest degree greater, this determines the question, 
 even in matters of speculation; and, in matters of prac- 
 tice, will lay us under an absolute and formal obligation, 
 in point of prudence and of interest, to act upon that 
 presumption, or low probability, though it be so low as 
 to leave the mind in very great doubt which is the truth.* 
 For surely a man is as really bound in prudence to do 
 what, upon the whole, appears according to the best of 
 his judgment to be for his happiness, as what he cer. 
 lainly knows to be so. Nay, further, in questioi.s of 
 gr(iat consequence, a reasonable man will think it con- 
 
 [* This course is reasonable, but more is required in religion. Its 
 evidence must be sufficient not only to show how its duties may be 
 performed, and to indicate the prudence of obedience, but strong 
 enough to cause full belief in a reasonable mind. Belief is a condi- 
 tion of salvation. ». 'd is involved in full submission to God.] 
 
36 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 cerns him to remark lower probabilities and presump- 
 tions than these ; such as amount to no more than show- 
 ing one side of a question to oe as supposable and cred- 
 ible as the other ; nay, such as but amount to much less 
 even than this. For numberless instances might be men- 
 tioned respecting the common pursuits of life, where a 
 man would be thought, in a literal sense, distracted, wlio 
 would not act, and with great application, too, not only 
 upon an even chance, but upon much less, and where the 
 probability or chance was greatly against his succeeding.* 
 4. It is not my design to inquire further into the 
 nature, the foundation, and measure of probability; or 
 Analogy of whence it proceeds, that likeness should be- 
 Sith^^^^"^ set that presumption, opinion, and full con- 
 objections. yiction which the human mind is formed to 
 
 receive from it, and which it does necessarily produce 
 in every one ; or to guard against the errors to which 
 reasoning from analogy is liable. This belongs to the 
 subject of logic,! and is a part of that subject which has 
 not yet been thoroughly considered. Indeed, I shall 
 not take upon me to say how far the extent, compass, and 
 force of analogical reasoning can be reduced to general 
 heads and rules, and the whole be formed into a system. 
 But though so little in this way has been attempted by 
 those who have treated of our intellectual powers, and 
 the exercise of them, this does not hinder but that we may 
 be, as we unquestionably are, assured that analogy is of 
 weight, in various degrees, toward determining our judg- 
 ment, and our practice. Nor does it in any wise cease 
 to be of weight in those cases, because persons, either 
 given to dispute, or who require things to be stated with 
 greater exactness than our faculties appear to admit of 
 in pijactical matters, may find other cases, in which it is 
 not easy to say whether it be, or be not, of any weight ; 
 
 * See part ii, chap. vi. 
 
 [f Sec Mills' System of Logic, book iii, chap xx ] 
 
Introduction. 37 
 
 or instances of seeming analogies, which are really of 
 none. It is enough to the present purpose to observe, 
 that this general way of arguing is evidently natuial, 
 just, and conclusive. For there is no man can make a 
 question but that the sun will rise to-morrow, and be 
 seen, where it is seen at all, in the figure of a circle, and 
 not in that of a square. 
 
 .5. Hence, namely from analogical reasoning, ( I'gen* 
 has with singular sagacity observed, that "he who be- 
 lieves the Scripture to have proceeded from ^^ , 
 
 ^ ^ Origen 8 re- 
 
 Him who is the Author of Nature, may well mark— its appM- 
 
 . . cation. 
 
 \ expect to find the same sort of difficulties in 
 nt as are found in the constitution of nature." And in 
 a like way of reflection, it may be added, that he who 
 denies the Scripture to have been from God, upon ac- 
 count of these difficulties, may, for the very same reason, 
 deny the world to have been formed by him. On the 
 other hand, if there be an analogy, or likeness, between 
 that system of things and dispensation of Providence 
 which revelation informs us of, and that system of 
 things and dispensation of Providence which experi- 
 ence, together with reason, informs us of, that is, the 
 known course of nature, this is a presumption that 
 they have both the same author and cause, at least 
 so far as to answer objections against the former be- 
 ing from God, drawn from any thing which is analog- 
 ical or similar to what is in the latter, which is ac- 
 knowledged to be from him ; for an author of nature is 
 here supposed. 
 
 * X/»f/ /iEv Tol ye Tov ana^ Trapadt^dfievov tov KTiaavroi ibv Koa/iov 
 eL'tt. ravra^ ra^ ypadug TZEireladai, ore baa Trepl ttj^ uTiaeo)^ arrair^i 
 roif ^TjTovoi TOV irepl avry^ Xoyov, ravra koI negl tuv yga(l>C)V. Plii- 
 local., p, 23, Ed. Cant. [This sagacious remark is,, however, strange- 
 ly misapplied by Origen to the establishment of one of his favorite 
 theories — that there is a mystical meaning in every word, and ever 
 letter, of Scripture. — F.] 
 
38 Analogy of Rel.gion. 
 
 6. Forming our notions of the constitution and gov- 
 ernment of the world upon reasoning, without founda- 
 tion for the principles which we assume, whether from 
 the attributes of God or any thing else, is building 
 a world upon hypothesis, like Descartes 
 
 Hypothesis . ^ ^^ ' • r 
 
 lain— Analogy Forming; our notions upon reasoning from 
 principles which are certain, but appliea t(j 
 cases to which we have no ground to apply them, (like 
 those who explain the structure of the human body, and 
 the nature of diseases and medicines, from mere mathe- 
 matics, without sufficient dafa,) is an error much akin 
 to the former ; since what is assumed in order to make 
 the reasoning applicable is hypothesis. But it must be 
 allowed just, to join abstract reasonings with the ob- 
 servation of facts, and argue from such facts as are 
 known to others that are like them ; from that part of 
 the divine government over intelligent creatures which 
 comes under our view, to that larger and more general 
 government over them which is beyond it ; and, from 
 what is present, to collect what is likely, credible, or 
 not incredible, will be hereafter. 
 
 7. This method, then, of concluding and determining 
 being practical, and what, if we will act at all, we can- 
 not but act upon in the common pursuits of 
 
 This method . . * . ... 
 
 conclusive —ap- life; being evidently conclusive, in various 
 
 pUed to religion. • 1 1 , j j 
 
 degrees, proi:)ortionable to the degree and 
 exactness of the whole analogy or likeness, and having 
 so great authority for its introduction into the subje<:t 
 of religion, even revealed religion, my design is to apply 
 it to that subject in general, both natural and revealed ; 
 taking for proved that there is an intelligent author of 
 nature, and natural governor of the world. For as 
 there is no presumption against this prior to the proof 
 of it, so it has been often proved, with accumulated evi- 
 dence, from this argument of analogy and final causes 
 from abstract reasonings, from the most ancient tradition 
 
Introduction. 39 
 
 and testimony, and from the general consent of mankind. 
 Nor does it appear, so far as I can find, to be denied by 
 the generality of those who profess themselves dissatis- 
 fied with the evidence of religion. 
 
 8. As there are some who, instead of thus attending 
 to what is in fact the constitution of nature, form their 
 notions of God's government upon hypothe- ^^^ ^^^^^^^ 
 sis, so there are others who indulge them- tions— their re- 
 
 . suits, 
 
 selves in vain and idle speculations,* how 
 the world might possibly have been framed otherwise than 
 it is ; and upon supposition that things might, in imag- 
 ining that they should, have been disposed and carried 
 on after a better model than what appears in the pres- 
 ent disposition and conduct of them. Suppose, now, a 
 person of such a turn of mind to go on with his reveries, 
 till he had at length fixed upon some particular plan of 
 nature as appearing to him the best — one shall scarce 
 be thought guilty of detraction against human under- 
 standing if one should say, even beforehand, that the 
 plan which this speculative person would fix upon, 
 though he were the wisest of the sons of men, prob- 
 ably would not be the very best, even according to 
 his own notions of desf ; whether he thought that to be 
 so which afforded occasions and motives for the exer- 
 cise of the greatest virtue, or which was productive of 
 the greatest happiness; or that these two were neces- 
 sarily connected, and ran up into one and the same plan. 
 However, it may not be amiss, once for all, to see what 
 would be the amount of these emendations and imagin- 
 ary improvements upon the system of nature, or how 
 far they would mislead us. And it seems there could 
 be no stopping till we came to some such conclusions 
 
 [•*■ In an illustration of these idle speculations, see Bayle's Response 
 aux Questions dhtn Provincial. See also notes to the Articles 
 Manichseus, Origen, Paulicians, in Bayle's Critical Dictionaty. Fitz. 
 gerald supposes Butler had Bayle in mind in this passage.] 
 
40 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 as these : — That all creatures should at first * be made as 
 perfect and as happy as they were capable of ever be- 
 ing ; that nothing, to be sure, of hazard or danger should 
 be put upon them to do, (some indolent persons would 
 perhaps think, nothing at all,) or certainly, that effectual 
 care should be taken that they should, whether necessa- 
 illy or not, yet eventually and in fact, always do what 
 was right and most conducive to happiness, which would 
 be thought easy for infinite power to effect ; either by 
 not giving them any principles which would endanger 
 their going wrong, or by laying the right motive of ac- 
 tion, in every instance, before their minds continually in 
 so, strong a manner, as would never fail of inducing them 
 to act conformably to it ; and that the whole method of 
 government by punishments should be rejected as ab- 
 surd ; as an awkward, roundabout method of carrying 
 things on ; nay, as contrary to a principal purpose for 
 which it would be supposed creatures were made, 
 namely, happiness. 
 
 9. Now, without considering what is to be said in 
 
 particular to the several parts of this train of folly and 
 
 „ , . . extravagance, what has been above intimat- 
 
 No faculties . . 
 
 f'jr such specu- ed is a full, direct, general answer to it,. 
 
 lations. 'J'his , , ' , r 1 11 
 
 shoivn in little namely, that we may see beforehand that we 
 ' * have not faculties for this kind of specula- 
 
 tion. For though it be admitted, that, from the first 
 principles of our nature, we unavoidably judge or deter- 
 mine some ends to be absolutely in themselves prefera- 
 ble to others, and that the ends now mentioned, or, if 
 they run up into one, that this one is absolutely the best, 
 and, consequently, that we must conclude the ultimate 
 end designed in the constitution of nature and conduct 
 of Pro\idence is the most virtue and happiness possible, 
 yet we are far from being able to judge what particular 
 
 [* That is, from birth, without the results of experience.] 
 
Introduction. 41 
 
 disposition of things would be most friendly and assist- 
 ant to virtue; or what means might be absolutely nec- 
 essary to produce the most happiness in a system of 
 such extent as our own world may be, taking in all that 
 is past and to come, though we should suppose it de- 
 tached from the whole of things. Indeed, we are so fai 
 from being able to judge of this that we are not judges 
 what may be the necessary means of raising and con- 
 ducting one person to the highest perfection and happi- 
 ness of his nature. Nay, even in the little affairs of the 
 present life, we find men of different educations and 
 ranks are not competent judges of the conduct of each 
 other. Our whole nature leads us to ascribe all moral 
 perfection to God, and to deny all imperfection of him. 
 And this will forever be a practical proof of his moral 
 character to such as will consider what a practical proof 
 is, because it is the voice of God speaking in us. And 
 from hence we conclude, that virtue must be the happi- 
 ness, and vice the misery, of every creature ; and that 
 regularity, and order, and right, cannot but prevail final- 
 ly, in a universe under his government. But we are in no 
 sort judges what are the necessary means of accomplish- 
 ing this end. 
 
 10. Let us, then, instead of that idle, and not very in- 
 nocent, employment of forming imaginary models of a 
 world, and schemes of governing it, turn our compare the 
 thoughts to what we experience to be the tm-?and ieiig- 
 conduct of nature with respect to intelli- *""* 
 gent creatures ; which may be resolved into general laws? 
 or rules of administration, in the same way as many of 
 tlie laws of nature respecting inanimate matter may be 
 collected from experiments. And let us compare the 
 known constitution and course of things with what is 
 said to be the moral system of nature ; the acknowl- 
 edged dispensations of Providence, or that government 
 ^'hich we find ourselves under, with what relii^iori 
 
42 ^Analogy of Religion. 
 
 teaches us to believe and expect, and see -.vhether they 
 are not analogous and of a piece. And upon such a 
 comparison it will, I think, be found that they are very 
 much so ; that both may be traced up to the same 
 general laws, and resolved into the same principles 
 of Divine conduct. 
 
 11. The analogy here proposed to be considered is of 
 pretty large extent, and consists of several parts ; ir 
 
 , some more, in others less exact. In some 
 
 The extent of , ' 
 
 Analogy— what few instances, perhaps, it may amount to a 
 
 It shows. . ^ . ^ 
 
 real, practical proof, in others not so; yet in 
 these it is a confirmation of what is proved otherwise. 
 It will undeniably show, what too many want to have 
 shown them, that the system of religion, both natural 
 and revealed, considered only as a system, and prior to 
 the proof of it, is not a subject of ridicule, unless that 
 of nature be so too. And it will afford an answer to 
 almost all objections against the system both of natural 
 and of revealed religion ; though not, perhaps, an answer 
 in so great a degree, yet in a very considerable degree 
 an answer, to the objections against the evidence of it ; 
 for objections against a proof, and objections against 
 what is said to be proved, the reader will observe, are 
 different things. 
 
 12. Now the Divine government of the world, implied 
 in the notion of religion in general, and of Christianity, 
 
 ^, , ^. contains in it, — That mankind is appointed 
 
 What the Di- . . . . 
 
 vine Govern- to Hvc in a future State, (chap, i;) that there 
 
 ment contains. 
 
 every one shall be rewarded or punished, 
 ^ (chap, ii ;) rewarded or punished respectively for all 
 that behavior here which we comprehend under the 
 words virtuous or vicious, morally good or evil, (chap, 
 iii ;) that our present life is a probation, a state of trial 
 (chap, iv) and of discipline (chap, v) for that future one 
 notwithstanding the objections which men may fancy 
 they have, from notions of necessity, against there being 
 
Introduction. 43 
 
 my such moral plan as this at all, (chap, vl ;) and what- 
 ever objections may appear to lie against the wisdom 
 ^nd goodness of it, as it stands so imperfectly made 
 known to us at present, (chap, vii ;) that this world be- 
 ing in a state of apostasy and wickedness, and conse- 
 quently of ruin, and the sense both of their condition 
 and duty being greatly corrupted among men, this gave 
 occasion for an additional dispensation of Providence, 
 of the utmost importance, (part ii, chap, i,) proved by 
 miracles, (chap, ii,) but containing in it many things ap- 
 pearing to us strange, and not to have been expected, 
 (chap, iii;) a dispensation of Providence, which is a 
 scheme or system of things, (chap, iv,) carried on 
 by the mediation of a divine person, the Messiah, in 
 order to the recovery of the world, (chap, v ;) yet not 
 revealed to all men, nor proved with the strongest pos- 
 sible evidence to all those to whom it is revealed ; but 
 only to such a part of mankind, and with such par- 
 ticular evidence, as the wisdom of God thought fit. 
 Chap, vi, vii. 
 
 13, The design, then, of the following Treatise will 
 be to show that the several parts principally objected 
 against in this moral and Christian dispen- The desi^ of 
 sation, including its scheme, its publication, *^^ i''"®^***^- 
 and the proof which God has afforded us of its truth; 
 that the particular parts principally objected against in 
 this whole dispensation are analogous to what is expe- 
 rienced in the constitution and course of nature or 
 providence; that the chief objections themselves which 
 are alleged against the former, are no other than what 
 may be alleged with like justness against the latter, 
 where they are found in fact to be inconclusive ; and that 
 this argument from analogy is in general unanswer- 
 able, and undoubtedly of weight on the side of religion, 
 (chap, viii,) notwithstanding the objections which may 
 seem to lie against it, and the real ground which there 
 
44 Analogy of Religion. 
 
 may be for difference of opinion as to the particular de- 
 gree of weight which is to be laid upon it. This is a 
 general account of what may be looked for in the fol- 
 lowing Treatise. And I shall begin it with that which 
 is the foundation of all our hopes and of all our fears- 
 all our hopes and fears which are of any consideration— 
 [ mean a Future Life. 
 
THE 
 
 ANALOGY OF RELIGION. 
 
 ♦•» 
 
 PART I. 
 
 OF NATURAL RELIGION. 
 
 CHAPTER L 
 
 OF A FUTURE LIFE.* 
 
 STRANGE difficulties have been raised by some con- 
 cerning personal identity, or the sameness of living 
 agents, iiiiplied in the notion of our existing: ^._ , 
 
 ° ' ^ , . ° Difficulties— 
 
 now and hereafter, or in any two successive the question to 
 
 .... 1 ^® considered- 
 
 moments ; which whoever thinks it worth 
 
 while may see considered in the first Dissertation at 
 
 the end of this Treatise. But, without regard to any of 
 
 them here, let us consider what the analogy of nature, 
 
 and the several changes which we have undergone, and 
 
 those which we know we may undergo without being 
 
 destroyed, suggest, as to the effect which death may, or 
 
 may not, have upon us ; and whether it be not from 
 
 thence probable that we may survive this change, and 
 
 exist in a future state of life and perception. 
 
 2, I. From our being born into the present wcr.d in 
 
 f* Chalmers regards this chapter as the least satisfactoiy in tlie 
 book, because it is infected with the obscure metaphysics of the age. 
 He particularly alludes to what Butler says of the indivisibility of 
 consciousness, and his argument based on this. The argument is 
 analyzed and severely criticised in Duke's Systematic Analvsis oftlie 
 /vnalogy, Appendix T. See also Whately's Essay*^ on Some t»f the 
 I'eculianties of the Christian Religion, page 63.] 
 
4^ Analogy of Religion. [Pari I 
 
 the helpless, imperfect state of infancy, and having ar- 
 
 The law of ^'^^^^ ^'^^^^ thence to mature age, we find it 
 
 chais-e indicates to be a general law of nature, in our own 
 
 R future life. . 
 
 species, that the same creatures, the same 
 individuals, should exist in degrees of life and percep- 
 tion, with capacities of action, of enjoyment and suffer- 
 ing, in one period of their being greatly different from 
 those appointed them in another period of it. And in 
 other creatures the same law holds. For the difference 
 of their capacities and states of life at their birth (to go 
 no higher) and in maturity; the change of worms into 
 flies, and the vast enlargement of their locomotive powers 
 by such change ; and birds and insects bursting the 
 shell, their habitation, and by this means entering into 
 a new world, furnished with new accommodations for 
 them, and finding a new sphere of action assigned them 
 — these are instances of this general law of nature. 
 Thus all the various and wonderful transformations of 
 animals are to be taken into consideration here. But 
 the states of life in which we ourselves existed formerly, 
 in the womb and in our infancy, are almost as different 
 from our present, in mature age, as it is possible to con- 
 ceive any two states or degrees of life can be. There- 
 fore, that we are to exist hereafter in a state as different 
 (suppose) from our present as this is from our former, is 
 but according to the analogy of nature; according to a 
 natural order or appointment of the very same kind 
 with what we have already experienced.* 
 
 * [I am not sure that this, at least at the present ?tage of the ai 
 g\imcnt, is a perfectly fair statement of the matter. For there is thi.s 
 essential difference between the state in which death appears to place 
 us, and any state previously known by experience — that in the former 
 we seem wholly deprived of any bodily organization. Previous expe- 
 rience might, indeed, go the length of showing that a thinking being 
 might continue the same, and retain the exercise of its living powers, 
 under infinite varieties of organization. But this surely is a different 
 thing from continuance without any organization whatever, nor capa- 
 
Chap. IJ Of a Future Life. • 47 
 
 3. II. We know that we are endued with capacities 
 of action, of happiness, and misery; for we are con- 
 scious of acting-, of enjoyins; pleasure, and of _ , 
 suffering pain. Now, that we have these continuance in- 
 
 ... - , , . dicates the same 
 
 powers and capacities before death, is a pre- 
 sumption that we shall retain them through and after 
 death ; indeed, a probability of it abundantly sufficieiU 
 to act upon, unless there be some positive reason tc 
 think that death is the destruction of those living pow- 
 ers : because there is in every case a probability that 
 all things will continue as we experience they are, in all 
 respects, except those in which we have some reason to 
 think they will be altered. This is that kitid^ of pre- 
 sumption or probability from analogy, expressed in the 
 very word continuance^ which seems our only natural 
 reason for believing the course of the world will con- 
 tinue to-morrow, as it has done so far as our experience 
 or knowledge of history can carry us back. Nay, it 
 seems our only reason for believing that any one sub- 
 stance now existing will continue to exist a moment 
 longer, the Self-existent Substance only excepted. Thus 
 
 ble of being reached by the present proof, unless we take in some 
 such additional considerations as Butler proceeds to allege after- 
 ward. However, it is to be remembered that natural religion does 
 not necessarily teach that we shall exist hereafter without any bodily 
 organization, — for we may pass, at death, into a bodily organization, 
 inappreciable by our present senses, for any thing we know to the 
 contrary, — and revealed religion does expressly teach that, in at 
 least one part of our future existence, we shall have a corporeal or- 
 ganization. In effect, the ancient theistical philosophers, who held a 
 future state of retribution, almost universally supposed the soul tc 
 pass into or retain some other body after its separation from the pres- 
 ent ; either, as in the vulgar metempsychosis, passing into another 
 '|ross body of the same kind, or retaining a certain ethereal vehicle 
 of its own. — F.] 
 
 * I say kind of presumption or probability ; for I do not mean to 
 aflirm that there is the same degree of conviction, that our living 
 powers will continue after death, as there is that our substances will, 
 
 \ 
 
4^ • Analogy of RELIGIo^^ [Part I. 
 
 if men were assured that the unknown event, death, was 
 not the destruction of our faculties of perception and of 
 action, there would be no apprehension that any other 
 power or event, unconnected with this of death, would 
 destroy these faculties just at the instant of each crea- 
 ture's death ; and therefore no doubt but that they 
 would remain after it : which shows the high probabili- 
 ty that our living powers will continue after death, un- 
 less there be some ground to think that death is their 
 destruction.* For if it would be in a manner certain 
 that we should survive deatli, provided it were certain 
 that death would not be our destruction, it must be 
 highly probable that we shall survive it, if there be no 
 ground to think death will be our destruction. 
 
 4. Now, though I think it must be acknowledged that 
 prior to the natural and moral proofs of a future life 
 Two reasons commonly insisted upon, there would arise 
 *" ^^' a general confused susoicion that in the 
 
 great shock and alteration which we shall undergo by 
 death, we, that is, our living powers, might be wholly 
 destroyed ; yet, even prior to those proofs, there is really 
 no particular distinct ground or reason for this appre- 
 hension at all, so far as I can find. If there be, it must 
 arise either from f/ie reason of the things or from the 
 analogy of Nature. 
 
 * Destruction of living porvers, is a manner of expression unavoida- 
 bly ambiguous ; and may signify either the destruction of a living be- 
 ing, so as that the same living being shall be incapable of ever per- 
 ceiving or acting again at all; or the destruction of those means and 
 instruments by which it is capable of its present life, of its present 
 state of perception and of action. It is here used in the former 
 sense. When it is used in the latter, the epithet /^'^j^;?/' is added. 
 The loss of a man's eye is a destruction of living powers in the latter 
 sense. But we have no reason to tliink the destruction of living 
 powers in the former sense to be possible. We have no more reason 
 to think a being endued with living powers ever loses them during its 
 whole existence, than to believe that a stone ever acquires them. 
 
Ghaf. I.] Of a Future Life. 49 
 
 But we cannot argue from the reason of the things that 
 death is the destruction of living agents, because we 
 know not at all what death is in itself; but ^^ ^ , 
 
 Not from tho 
 
 only some of its effects, such as the dissolu- reason of the 
 
 ' thing. 
 
 tion of flesh, skin, and bones. And these 
 effects do in nowise appear to imply the destruction of 
 a living agent. And besides, as we are greatly in the 
 dark upon what the exercise of our living powers de- 
 pends, so we are wholly ignorant what the powers them- 
 selves depend upon ; the powers themselves, as distin- 
 guished not only from their actual exercise, but also 
 from the present capacity of exercising them ; and as op- 
 posed to their destruction : for sleep, or however,* a 
 swoon, shows us not only that these powers exist when 
 they are not exercised, as the passive power of motion 
 does in inanimate matter, but shows also that they exist 
 when there is no present capacity of exercising them ; or 
 that the capacities of exercising them for the present, as 
 well as the actual exercise of them, may be suspended, and 
 yet the powers themselves remain undestroyed. Since, 
 then, we know not at all upon what the existence of our 
 living powers depends, this shows further, there can no 
 probability be collected from the reason of the thing, 
 that death will be their destruction : because their ex- 
 istence may depend upon somewhat in no degree affect- 
 ed by death ; upon somewhat quite out of the reach of 
 this king of terrors. So that there is nothing more cer- 
 tain than that the reason of the thing shows us no con- 
 nection between death and the destruction of living 
 agents. 
 
 Nor can we find any thing throughout the whole anal- 
 ogy of Nature to afford us even the slight- Not from anai- 
 est presumption that animals ever lose their o?y ^^ ^"^^^^i"*^- 
 living powers ; much less, if it were possible, that they 
 lose them by death ; for we have no faculties wherewith 
 
 * However, in the sense of at least, or rather. 
 4 
 
50 
 
 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 to trace any beyond or through it, so as to see what be- 
 comes of them. This event removes them from our 
 view. It destroys the sensible proof, which we had be- 
 fore their death, of their being possessed of living pow- 
 ers, but does not appear to afford the least reason to 
 believe that they are then, or by that event, deprived 
 of them. 
 
 And our knowing that they were possessed of these 
 powers, up to the very period to which we have faculties 
 capable of tracing them, is itself a probability of their 
 retaining them beyond it. And this is confirmed, and a 
 sensible credibility is given to it, by observing the very 
 great and astonishing changes which we have experi- 
 enced ; so great, that our existence in another state of 
 life, of perception and of action, will be but according 
 to a method of providential conduct, the like to which 
 has been already exercised, even with regard to our- 
 selves ; according to a course of nature, the like to 
 which we have already gone through. 
 
 5. However, as one cannot but be greatly sensible 
 
 how difficult it is to silence imagination enough to make 
 
 the voice of reason even distinctly heard in 
 
 Imaginary 
 
 presumptions, tliis casc, as we are accustomed, from our 
 
 1 W^o Mr*i coni" • 
 
 pound, so dis- youth up, to indulge that forward delusive 
 "^^^'^^ ^' faculty, ever obtruding beyond its sphere, 
 
 (of some assistance, indeed, to apprehension, but the 
 author of all error :) as we plainly lose ourselves in gross 
 and crude conceptions of things, taking for granted that 
 we are acquainted with what, indeed, we are wholly 
 ignorant of — it may be proper to consider the imaginary 
 presumptions, that death will be our destruction, arising 
 from these kinds of early and lasting prejudices; and 'o 
 show how little they can really amount to, even though 
 we cannot wholly divest ourselves of them. And, 
 
 I. All presumption of death's being the destruction 
 r>f living bein;2;s, must go upon sui:)position that they are 
 
compounded, and so di*scerptiDle. 'But since conscious- 
 ness is a single and indivisible power, it should seein 
 that the subject in which it resides must be so too. For 
 were the motion of any particle of matter absolutely one 
 and indivisible, so as that it should imply a contradic- 
 tion to suppose part of this motion to exist and part not 
 to exist — that is, part of this matter to move, and part 
 to be at rest — then its power of motion would be indi- 
 visible ; and so also would the subject in which the 
 power inheres, namely, the particle of matter: for if this 
 could be divided into two, one part might be moved and 
 the other at rest, which. is contrary to the supposition. 
 
 In like manner, it has been argued,* and for any thing 
 appearing to the contrary, justly, that since the percep- 
 tion or consciousness which we have of our own exist- 
 ence is indivisible, so as that it is a contradiction to 
 suppose one part of it should be here and the other 
 there ; the perceptive power, or the power of conscious- 
 
 * See Dr. Clarke's Letter to Mr. Dodwell, and the Defenses of it. 
 
 [This celebrated controversy was occasioned by a strange book of 
 Dodwell's entitled An Epistolary Discourse Touching the Natural 
 Mortality of the Human Soul, etc., in which he maintained that the 
 human soul is naturally mortal, but supernaturally immortalized by 
 the Holy Spirit, conferred in the sacrament of baptism, when per- 
 formed by legitimately ordained ministers. Dr. Clarke answered his 
 book and wrote four tracts on the controversy. Anthony Collins 
 wrote " in support of Dodwell's views of the natural mortality of the 
 soul." — F. 
 
 Ancient writers believed the soul to be indivisible. Cicero makes 
 Cato say, " The soul is a simple, uncompounded substance, without 
 I arts or mixture ; it cannot be divided, and so cannot perish." And 
 again, *' I could never believe that the soul lost its senses by escaping 
 frc»m senseless matter ; or that such a release will not enlarge and 
 improve its powers. ... I am persuaded that I shall only begin 
 truly to live when I cease to live in this world." Xenophon reports 
 Cyrus as saying, in his last moments, " O, my son, do not imagine 
 that when death has taken me from you I shall cease to exist "— 
 M.Al.i o\i.| 
 
^2 ■ Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 ness, is indivisible too; and consequently the subject 
 
 in which it resides, that is, the conscious being. Now 
 
 uyjop supposition that the living agent each man calls 
 
 himself is thus a single being, which there is at. least 
 
 no more difficulty in conceivins: than in con- 
 cur organized , . , 
 
 bodies not our- cciviug it to be a compouud, and of which 
 
 sdv6S 
 
 there is the proof now mentioned ; it follows 
 that our organized bodies are no more ourselves, or part 
 of ourselves, than any other matter around us. And it 
 is as easy to conceive how matter, which is no part of 
 ourselves, may be appropriated to us in the manner 
 which our present bodies are, as. how we can receive im- 
 pressions from, and have power over, any matter. It is 
 as easy to conceive, that we may exist out of bodies 
 as in them ; that we might have animated bodies of any 
 other organs and senses wholly different from these now 
 given us, and that we may hereafter animate these same 
 or new bodies variously modified and organized, as to 
 conceive how we can animate such bodies as our pres- 
 ent. And, lastly, the dissolution of all these several 
 organized bodies, supposing ourselves to have success- 
 ively animated them, would have no more conceivable 
 tendency to destroy the living beings, ourselves, or de- 
 prive us of living faculties, the faculties of perception 
 and of action, thail the dissolution of any foreign mat- 
 ter, which we are capable of receiving impressions from, 
 and making use of for the common occasions of life. 
 
 6. II. The simplicity and absolute oneness of a living 
 agent cannot, indeed, from the nature of the thing, be 
 
 Tbis proved properly proved by experimental observa^ 
 t)T experience. xXows,. But as these fall in with the suppo- 
 sition of its unity, so they plainly lead us to conclude cer- 
 tainly, that our gross organized bodies, with which we 
 perceive the objects of sense, and with which we act, 
 are no part of ourselves, and therefore show us that we 
 have no reason to believe their destruction to be ours; 
 
Chap. I.] Of a Future Life. 53 
 
 even without determining whether our living substance 
 be material or immaterial. For we see by experience 
 that men may lose their limbs, their organs of sense, and 
 even the greatest part of these bodies, and yet remain 
 the same living agents. And persons can trace up the 
 existence of themselves to a time when the bulk of their 
 bodies was extremely small in comparison of what it is 
 in mature age : and we cannot but think that they might 
 then have lost a considerable part of that small body, 
 and yet have remained the same living agents, as they 
 may now lose great part of their present body and re- 
 main so. And it is certain, that the bodies of all ani- 
 mals are in a constant flux, from that never-ceasing attri- 
 tion which there is in every part of them. Now, things 
 of this kind unavoidably teach us to distinguish between 
 these living agents, ourselves, and large quantities of 
 matter, in which we are very nearly interested ; since 
 these may be alienated, and actually are in a daily course 
 of succession, and changing their owners ; while we are 
 assured that each living agent remains one and the same 
 permanent being.* And this general observation leads 
 us on to the following ones. 
 
 (i.) That we have no way of determining by experi- 
 ence what is the certain bulk of the living being each 
 man calls himself; and yet, till it be deter- Bulk of living 
 mined that it is larger in bulk than the solid ^®*°^" 
 elementary particles of matter, which there is no ground 
 to think any natural power can dissolve, there is no sort 
 of reason to think death to be the dissolution of it, of 
 lie living being, even though it should not be absolutely 
 indiscerptible. 
 
 (2.) From our being so nearly related to, Bvftem'"ofTr!!-!t- 
 and interested in. certain systems of matter, fernot the uv- 
 suppose our flesh and bones, and afterward 
 ceasing to be at all related to them, the living agents, 
 
 * See Dissertntion I. 
 
54 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 ourselves, remaining all this while undestroyed, not- 
 withstanding such alienation ; and consequently these 
 systems of matter not being ourselves : it follows, fur- 
 ther, that we have no ground to conclude any other, 
 suppose internal systems oi matter, to be the living agents 
 ourselves; because we can have no ground to conclude 
 this but from our relation to, and interest in, such othei 
 systems of matter ; and therefore we can have no rea- 
 son to conclude what befalls those systems of matter at 
 death, to be the destruction of the living agents. We have 
 already, several times over, lost a great part, oi perhaps 
 the whole, of our body, according to certain common es- 
 tablished laws of nature; yet we remain the same living 
 agents ; when we shall lose as great a part, or the whole, 
 by another common established law of nature, death, 
 why may we not also remain the same ? That the alien- 
 ation has been gradual in one case, and in the other 
 will be more at once, does not prove any thing to the 
 contrary. We have passed undestroyed through those 
 many and great revolutions of matter, so peculiarly ap- 
 propriated to us ourselves ; why should we imagine death 
 will be so fatal to us.-* Nor can it be objected, that 
 Obtection— what is thus alienated, or lost, is no part of 
 part^onhfJri^^ our original solid body, but only adventi- 
 naibody. tious matter because we may lose entire 
 
 limbs, which must have contained many solid parts and 
 vessels of the original body : or if this be not admitted, 
 we have no proof that any of these solid parts are dis- 
 solved or alienated by death ; though, by the way, we 
 are very nearly related to that extraneous or adventi- 
 tious matter, while it continues united to and distend- 
 ing the several parts of our solid body. But after all, 
 the relation a person bears to those parts of his body to 
 which he is the most nearly related, what does it appear 
 to amount to but this, that the living agent and those 
 Darts of the body mutually affect each other? And the 
 
Chap. I.J Of a Future Life. 55 
 
 same thing, the same thing in kind though not in degree, 
 may be said of all foreign matter which gives us ideas, 
 and which we have any power over. From these ob- 
 servations the whole ground of the imagination is re- 
 moved, that the dissolution of any matter is the destruc- 
 tion of a living agent, from the interest he once had in 
 such matter. 
 
 (3.) If we consider our body somewhat more distinct- 
 ly, as made up of organs and instruments of perception 
 and of motion, it will bring us to the same Thebodycom- 
 conclusion. Thus, the common optical ex- posed of organs, 
 periments show, and even the observation, 
 how sight is assisted by glasses shows, that we see with 
 our eyes in the same sense as we see with glasses. Nor is 
 there any reason to believe that we see with them in 
 any other sense ; any other, I mean, which would lead 
 us to think the eye itself a percipient. The like ife to 
 be said of hearing : and our feeling distant solid matter 
 by means of somewhat in our hand, seems an instance 
 of the like kind, as to the subject we are considering. 
 All these are instances of foreign matter, or such as is 
 no part of our body, being instrumental in preparing 
 objects for, and conveying them to, the perceiving power, 
 in a manner similar or like to the manner in which our 
 organs of sense prepare and convey them. Both are, in 
 a like way, instruments of our receiving such ideas from 
 external objects as the Author of nature appointed those 
 external objects to be the occasions, of exciting in us. 
 However,* glasses are evidently instances of this ; namely, 
 of matter which is no part of our body preparing objecfs 
 for, and conveying them toward, the perceiving power, 
 in like manner as our bodily organs do. And if we see 
 with our eyes only, in the same manner as we do with 
 glasses, the like may justly be concluded, from analogy, 
 
 * [In the sense of at least, at any rate. The case is presented as 
 one that will not be disputed.] 
 
56 Analogy of Religion. LPart L 
 
 of all our other senses. It is not intended, b} any thing 
 
 here said, to affirm that the whole apparatus of vision, 
 
 or of perception by any other of our senses, 
 
 Perception not ^ ^ ^ ^ . . 
 
 traceable to its can be traced through all its steps quite up 
 
 source. , ,. . r - 
 
 to the living power of seeing, or perceiving 
 but that so far as it can be traced by experimental ob- 
 servations, so far it appears that our organs of sense 
 prepare and convey on objects, in order to their being 
 perceived, in like manner as foreign matter does> with- 
 out affording any shadow of appearance that they them- 
 selves perceive. And that we have no reason to think 
 our organs of sense percipients, is confirmed by instances 
 of persons losing some of them, the living beings them- 
 selves, their former occupiers, remaining unimpaired. 
 It is confirmed also by the experience of dreams; by 
 which we find we are at present possessed of a latent, 
 and what would otherwise be an unimagined, unknown 
 power of perceiving * sensible objects in as strong and 
 lively a manner without our external organs of sense as 
 with them. 
 
 7. So, also, with regard to our power of moving or 
 directing motion by will and choice : upon the destruc- 
 tion of a limb, this active power remains, as it 
 
 Power remains . , 
 
 after the ororans evidently sccms, unlesscned ; so as that the 
 
 are destroyed. , . . , . . , „ 1 -i • i 
 
 living being, who has suffered this loss, 
 would be capable of moving as before, if it had another 
 limb to move with. It can walk by the help of an arti- 
 ficial leg, just as it can make use of a pole or a lever to 
 reach toward itsdlf, and to move things beyond the 
 length and the power of its natural arm : and this last it 
 does in the same manner as it reaches and moves, with 
 its natural arm, things nearer and of less weight. Nor 
 is there so much as any appearance of our limbs being 
 endued with a power of moving or directing themselves ; 
 though they are adapted, like the several parts of a ma- 
 * That is, of imagining or conceiving. 
 
Chap. IJ Of a Future Life. 57 
 
 chine, to he the instruments of motion to each other; 
 and some parts of the same limb, to be instruments of 
 motion to oth'er parts of it. 
 
 8, Thus a man determines that he will look at such 
 an object through a microscope ; or, being lame, sup- 
 pose, that he will walk to such a place with 
 
 ^ . ^ . Illustrations: 
 
 a staff a week hence. His eyes and his the microicope, 
 
 , . . , staff, etc. 
 
 feet no more determme m these cases than 
 the microscope and the staff. Nor is there any ground 
 to think they any more put the determination in prac- 
 tice, or that his eyes are the seers, or his feet the mov- 
 ers, in any other sense than as the microscope and the 
 staff are. Upon the whole, then, our organs of sense 
 and our limbs are certainly instruments which the living 
 persons, ourselves, make use of to perceive and move 
 with :* there is not any probability that they are any 
 more ; nor, consequently, that we have any other kind 
 
 * [" S. What shall we say, then, of the shoemaker ? That he cuts 
 with his instruments only, or with his hands also ? " 
 
 "A. With his hands also." 
 
 " .S". Does he use his eyes also in making shoes ? " 
 
 "^. Yes." 
 
 " S. The shoemaker, then, and harper are different from the hands 
 and eyes they use ? " 
 
 *' A. It appears so." 
 
 ** S. Does a man then use his whole hody?" 
 
 "A. Certainly." 
 
 " S. But he who uses, and that which he uses, are different ?** 
 
 •M. Yes." 
 
 *' S. A man, then, is something different from his own body?'* 
 •' Plato, Alcibi. Piim., p. 129, D. Stallb. Ed. 
 
 " It may easily be perceived that the mind both sees and hears, 
 at id not those parts which are, so to speak, windows of the mind. 
 Neither are we bodies ; nor do I, while speaking this to thee, speak to 
 thy body. What ever is done by thy mind is done by thee." — Cicero, 
 Tuic. Dispiit., I, 20, 46 and 22, 52. 
 
 "The mind of each man is the man ; not that figure which may 
 be pointed out with the finger." — Cicero, de Rep., book vi, ^ 24. — 
 Mai coM.l 
 
58 Analogy of Rfligion. [Part I. 
 
 of relation to them than what we may have to any other 
 foreign matter formed into instruments of perception 
 and motion, suppose into a microscope or' a siaff, (I say, 
 any other kind of relation, for I am not speaking of the 
 degree of it;) nor, consequently, is there any probabili- 
 ty that the alienation or dissolution of these instru- 
 ments is the destruction of the perceiving and moving 
 agent. 
 
 9. And thus our finding, that the dissolution of mat- 
 ter in which living beings were most nearly interested is 
 
 General con- ^^^ their dissolution ; and that the destruc- 
 ciusion. ^Jqj^ q^ several of the organs and instruments 
 
 of perception, and of motion belonging to them, is not 
 their destruction ; shows demonstratively that there is 
 no ground to think that the dissolution of any other 
 matter, or destruction of any other organs and instru- 
 ments, will be the dissolution or destruction of living 
 agents, from the like kind of relation. And we have no 
 reason to think we stand in any other kind of relation 
 to any thing which we find dissolved by death. 
 
 10. But it is said, these observations are equally ap- 
 plicable to brutes ; and it is thought an insuperable dif- 
 ficulty, that they should be immortal, and 
 
 Objections rel- ■' ■' 
 
 ative to brutes, by conscQuence, capable of everlasting hap- 
 
 1. Invidious. f , . . . 
 
 pniess. Now this manner of expression is 
 both invidious and weak; but the thing intended by it 
 is really no difficulty at all, either in the way of natural 
 01 moral consideration. For, first. Suppose the invidi- 
 ous thing designed in such a manner of expression were 
 really implied, as it is not in the least, in the natural 
 immortality of brutes; namely, that they must arrive 
 at great attainments, and become rational and moral 
 agents; even this would be no difficulty, since we know 
 not what latent powers and capacities they may be en- 
 dued with. There was once, prior to experience, as 
 great presumption against human creatures, as there i.s 
 
Chap. IJ Of a Future Life. 59 
 
 against the brute creatures, arriving at that degree of 
 understanding which we have in mature age, for we can 
 trace up our own existence to the same original with 
 theirs. And we find it to be a general law of nature, 
 that creatures endued with capacities of virtue and re- 
 ligion should be placed in a condition of being in which 
 they are altogether without the use of them for a con- 
 siderable length of their duration, as in infancy and 
 childhood. And great part of the human species go out 
 of the present world before they come to the exercise 
 of these capacities in any degree at all. But then, sec- 
 ondly, The natural immortality of brutes does not, in 
 the least, imply that they are endued with 
 any latent capacities of a rational or moral 
 nature. And the economy of the universe might re- 
 quire that there should be living creatures without any 
 capacities of this kind. And all difficulties, as to the 
 manner how they are to be disposed of, are so apparent- 
 ly and wholly founded in our ignorance, that it is won- 
 derful they should be insisted upon by any, but such 
 as are weak enough to think they are acquainted with 
 the whole system of things. There is, then, absolute- 
 ly nothing at all in this objection, which is so rhetor- 
 ically urged against the greatest part of the natural 
 proofs or presumptions of the immortality of human 
 minds : I say, the greatest part ; for it is less applicable 
 to the following observation, which is more peculiar to 
 mankind : — * 
 
 * [This objection caused great perplexity formerly, and led Des 
 Cartes, in order to evade its force, to maintain that brutes are little 
 more than machines — an opinion maintained by leading materialists 
 of the present day. The immortality of brutes is discussed in Des 
 Cartes on the Passions ; Baxter on the Nature of the Soul ; Hume's 
 Essays. Essay ix ; Search's Light of Nature ; Cheyne's Philosophical 
 Principles; Wagstaff on the Immortality of Brutes; Edwards' Crit- 
 ical and Philosophical Exercitations ; Watts' Essays, Essay ix ; CoUi- 
 oer's Inquiry- ; Locke on the Understanding, book ii, chap, ix ; 
 
6o Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 II III. That as it is evident our /r<?j^«/ powers and 
 capacities of reason, memory, and affection, do not de- 
 pend upon our gross body, in the manner in 
 
 Eeason, mem- ^ , ^ . '^ •' 
 
 ory, etc.. depend which perception by our organs of sense 
 
 not on the body sr r j o 
 
 as perception, does, SO they do not appear to depend upon 
 it at all in any such manner as to give 
 ground to think that the dissolution of this body will be 
 the destruction of these omv prese fit ^owtxs of reflection, 
 as it will of our powers of sensation, or to give ground 
 to conclude, even, that it will be so much as a suspen- 
 sion of the former. 
 
 Human creatures exist at present in two states of life 
 and perception, greatly different from each other; each 
 of which has its own peculiar laws, and its own peculiar 
 enjoyments and sufferings. When any of our senses are 
 affected, or appetites gratified with the objects of them, 
 we may be said to exist, or live, in a state of sensation. 
 When none of our senses are affected, or appetites grat- 
 ified, and yet we perceive, and reason, and act, we may 
 be said to exist or live in a state of reflection. Now it 
 is by no means certain, that any thing which is dissolved 
 by death is any way necessary to the living being, in 
 this its state of reflection, after ideas are gained. For 
 though from our present constitution and condition of 
 Power of re- being, our external organs of sense are nec- 
 penStS^^' essary for conveying in ideas to our reflect- 
 death. -j^g powers, as carriages and levers and 
 
 scaffolds are in architecture ; yet when these ideas are 
 brought in, we are capable of reflecting in the most in- 
 tense degree, and of enjoying the greatest pleasure, and 
 feeling tlie greatest pain, by means of that reflection, 
 without any assistance from our senses; and without 
 any at all, which we know of, from that body which will 
 
 Dilton on the Resurrection ; Willis' De Anima Brutce ; Bayle's Dic- 
 tionary, under the articles Pereira and Rorarius ; Poliguac's Anti- 
 Lucretius.] 
 
Chap. I.] Of a Future Life. 6i 
 
 be dissolved by death. It does not appeal, then, ihat 
 the relation of this gross body to the reflecting being is, 
 in any degree, necessary to thinking; to our intellectual 
 enjoyments or sufferings : nor, consequently, that the 
 dissolution or alienation of the former by death will be 
 the destruction of those present powers, which rendei us 
 capable of this state of reflection. 
 
 12. Further, there are instances of mortal diseases, 
 which do not at all aff'ect our present intellectual pow- 
 ers, and this affords a presumption, that Mortal diseas- 
 those diseases will not destroy these present ptwel-sof SS 
 powers. Indeed, from the observations made *'^*"* 
 above,* it appears that there is no presumption, from 
 their mutually affecting each other, that the dissolution 
 of the body is the destruction of the living agent. f And 
 by the same reasoning it must appear, too, that there is 
 no presumption, from their mutually affecting each othei, 
 that the dissolution of the body is the destruction of 
 our present reflecting powers; but instances of their not 
 affecting each other afford a presumption to the con- 
 trary. Instances of mortal diseases not impairing our 
 present reflecting powers, evidently turn our thoughts 
 even from imagining such diseases to be the destruction 
 of them. Several things, indeed, greatly affect all our 
 living powers, and at length suspend the exercise of 
 them ; as, for instance, drowsiness, increasing till it ends 
 in sound sleep : and from hence we might have imagined 
 it would destroy them, till we found, by experience, the 
 weakness of this way of judging. But in the diseases 
 now mentioned, there is not so much as this shadow o( 
 probability, to lead us to any such conclusion, as tc the 
 reflecting powers which we have at present; for in those 
 diseases, persons, the moment before death, appear to 
 
 * Pages 52-54- 
 
 f [Observe the distinction between the " living agent" or living 
 powers and " reflecting powers."] 
 
62 Analogy of Religion. [Part I 
 
 be in the highest vigor of life. They discover appre- 
 hension, memory, reason, all entire ; with the utmost 
 force of affection, sense of a character of shame and 
 honor; and the highest mental enjoyments and suffer- 
 ings, even to the last gasp; and these surely prove even 
 greater vigor of life than bodily strength does. Now 
 what pretense is there for thinking that a progressive 
 disease, when arrived to such a degree — I mean that 
 degree which is mortal — will destroy those powers, which 
 were not impaired, which were not affected by it, dur- 
 ing its whole progress, quite up to that degree.? And if 
 death, by diseases of this kind, is not the destruction of 
 our present reflecting powers, it will scarce be thought 
 that death by any other means is. 
 
 13. It is obvious that this general observation maybe 
 carried on further: and there appears so little connec- 
 tion between our bodily powers of sensa- 
 
 Death may not . 
 
 even suspend tiou and our present powers of reflection, 
 that there is no reason to conclude that 
 death, which destroys the former, does so much as sus- 
 pend the exercise of the latter, or interrupt our continu- 
 ing to exist in the like state of reflection which we do 
 now. For suspension of reason, memory, and the affec- 
 tions which they excite, is no part of the idea of death, 
 nor is implied in our notion of it. And our daily expe- 
 riencing these powers to be exercised, without any as 
 sistance, that we know of, from those bodies which will 
 be dissolved by death ; and our finding often, that the 
 exercise of them is so lively to the last ; these things 
 afford a sensible apprehension that death may not, per- 
 haps, be so much as a discontinuance of Uie exercise of 
 these powers, nor of the enjoyments and sufferings 
 which it implies ;* so that our posthumous life, what- 
 
 * There are three distinct questions relating to a future life here 
 considered : Whether death be the destruction of living agents? If 
 net. Whether it be the destruction of ^Xi^vc present powers of reflec- 
 
Chap. I.] Of a Future Life. 63 
 
 ever there may be in it additional to our present, vet 
 may not be entirely beginning anew, but going on 
 Death may, in some sort, and in some respects, answer 
 to our birth, which is not a suspension of the faculties 
 which we had before it, or a total change of the state of 
 life in which we existed when in the womb, but a con- 
 tinuation of both with such and such great alterations. 
 14. Nay, for aut^ht we know of ourselves — of our pres- 
 ent life, and of death — death may immediately, in the 
 natural course of things, put us into a high- 
 
 1 1 , , r 1- r Death mav in- 
 
 er and more enlarged state of life, as our troduce us to a 
 birth does;* a state in which our capacities ^ ^^^^ate. 
 and sphere of perception and of action may be much 
 greater than at present. Por as our relation to our ex- 
 ternal organs of sense renders us capable of existing in 
 our present state of sensation, so it may be the only 
 natural hinderance to our existing, immediately and of 
 course, in a higher state of reflection. The truth is, 
 reason does not at all show us in what state death natu- 
 rally leaves us. But were we sure that it would suspend 
 all our perceptive and active powers, yet the suspension 
 of a power and the destruction of it are effects so totally 
 different in kind, as we experience from sleep and a 
 swoon, that we cannot in anywise argue from one to tlie 
 
 tion, as it certainly is the destruction of their present powers of sen- 
 sation ? and, if not, Whether it be the suspension or discontinuance 
 of the exercise of these present reflecting powers ? Now, if there be 
 no reason to believe the last, there will be, if that were possible, less 
 ftjr the next, and less still for the first. 
 
 * This, according to Strabo, was the opinion of the Brahmins : 
 Sofiii^eLV fiEv yap 6t/ tov /alv hddde (3 iov, cjc uv ukiitjv kvouevuv elvar 
 TOP di: ^dvcTov, yiveaiv etc tov ovtuc j3iov. nal tov evdaiuova Tolg <pi?:.o(T- 
 o<?;7cra(Ti,— Lib. xv, p. 1039. Ed. Amst., 1707. To which opinion, 
 perhaps Antoninus may allude in these words ; 'Qj- vvv TreoiuEveir, 
 noTe £fi6pvov ek ttjc yaoTpoc Tfjq yvvaiKog aov k^iXdj, ovtuc EKdFx^odai 
 
 T7JV Z)paV kv 7] TO -ipVxdpiOV aov tov kXvTpOV TOVTOV kKTTEaElTai. I,ib. 
 
 ix, c. 3. 
 
64 Analogy of R::licion. [Part I. 
 
 other ; or conclude, even to the lowest degree of probabil- 
 ity, that the same kind of force which is sufficient to sus- 
 pend our faculties, though it be increased ever so much, 
 will be sufficient to destroy them. 
 
 15. These observations together may be sufficient to 
 show how little presumption there is that death is tlie 
 
 Analogy from destruction of human crcaturcs. However, 
 p an s ano u . ^]^qj.q jg t^g shadow of an analogy, which may 
 lead us to imagine it is — the supposed likeness which is 
 observed between the decay of vegetables and of living 
 creatures. And this likeness is indeed sufficient to af- 
 ford the poets very apt allusions to the flowers of the 
 field, in their pictures of the frailty of our present life. 
 But in reason, the analogy is so far from holding, that 
 there appears no ground even for the comparison, as to 
 the present question ; because one of the two subjects 
 compared is wholly void of that, which is the principal 
 and chief thing in the other, the power of perception 
 and of action ; and which is the only thing we are in- 
 quiring about the continuance of. So that the destruc- 
 tion of a vegetable is an event not similar, or analogous, 
 to the destruction of a living agent. 
 
 16. But if, as was above intimated, leaving off the de- 
 lusive custom of substituting imagination in the room of 
 
 , . experience, we would confine ourselves to 
 
 The conclusion. '■ 
 
 what we do know and understand ; if we 
 would argue only from that, and from that form our ex- 
 pectations, it would appear at first sight that as no proba- 
 bility of living beings ever ceasing to be so, can be con- 
 cluded from the reason of the thing, so none can be 
 collected from the analogy of Nature ; because we can- 
 not trace any living beings beyond death. But as we 
 are conscious that we are endued with capacities of per- 
 ception and of action, and are living persons, what we 
 are to go upon is, that we shall continue so, till we fore- 
 see some accident or event which will endanGrer those 
 
Chap. I.] Of a Future Life. 65 
 
 capacities, or be likely to destroy us ; which death does 
 in nowise appear to be. 
 
 17. And thus, when we go out of this world, we may 
 pass into new scenes, and a new state of life and action, 
 just as naturally as we came into the pres- The future 
 ent. And this new state may naturally be ^ ' °^ ^^ 
 a social one. And the advantages of it, advantages of 
 every kind, may naturally be bestowed, according to some 
 fixed general laws of wisdom, upon every one in propor- 
 tion to the degrees of his virtue. And though the ad- 
 vantages of that future natural state should not be be- 
 stowed, as these of the present in some measure are, b> 
 the will of the society, but entirely by His more immed' - 
 ate action upon whom the whole frame of nature depends, 
 yet this distribution may be just as natural, as their be- 
 ing distributed here by the instrumentality of mm. 
 And, indeed, though one were to allow any confared, 
 undetermined sense which people please to put upon 
 the word natural^ it would be a shortness of thought 
 scarce credible to imagine that no system' or course of 
 things can be so, but only what we see at present ;* 
 especially while the probability of a future life, or the 
 natural immortality of the soul, is admitted upon the 
 evidence of reason; because this is really both admit- 
 ting and denying, at once, a state of being different from 
 the present to be natural. But the only distinct mean- 
 ing of that word is, stated^ fixed, or settled ; Meaning of 
 since what is natural as much requires and "•'^*'^'''^^- 
 presupposes an intelligent agent to render it so — that is, 
 to effect it continually, or at stated times — as what i« 
 supernatural or miraculous does to effect it for once. 
 And from hence it must follow, that persons' notion of 
 what is natural will be enlarged in proportion to their 
 greater knowledge of the works of God, and the dispen 
 sations of his providence. Nor is there any absurdity 
 * See part ii, chap, ii, and part ii, chap. iii. 
 
66 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 in supposing, that there may be beings in the universe 
 whose capacities, and knowledge, and views may be so 
 extensive, as that the whole Christian dispensation may 
 to them appear natural; that is, analogous or conforma- 
 ble to God's dealings with other parts of his creation ; 
 as natural as the visible known course of things appears 
 to us. For there seems scarce any other possible sense 
 to be put upon the word, but that only in which it is 
 here used : similar, stated, or uniform. 
 
 1 8. This credibility of a future life, which has been 
 
 here insisted upon, how little soever it may satisfy our 
 
 curiosity, seems to answer all the purposes 
 
 Probable evi- ...... 
 
 denceofafuture of religion, in like manner as a demonstra- 
 
 lil6 3S ctfcctivG 
 
 as demonstra- tive proof would. Indeed, a proof, even a 
 demonstrative one, of a future life, would 
 not be a proof of reHgion. For that we are to live here- 
 after is just as reconcilable with the scheme of atheism, 
 and as well to be accounted for by it, as that we are 
 now alive is; and therefore nothing can be more absurd 
 than to argue' from that scheme that there can be no fu- 
 ture state. But as religion implies a future state, any 
 presumption against such a state is a presumption against 
 religion. And the foregoing observations remove all 
 presumptions of that sort, and prove, to a very consider- 
 able degree of probability, one fundamental doctrine of 
 religion ; which, if believed, would greatly open and dis- 
 pose the mind seriously to attend to the general evidence 
 of the whole. 
 
 NOTE. 
 
 [As peculiar difficulty is often found in gaining a connected view 
 of the whole argument in this important chapter, it seems advisable 
 to subjoin an abstract of it. 
 
 We must remember that there are three questions involved in the 
 subject of this chapter : — 
 
 Does death destroy the living agent we call ourself ? 
 
 Does it destroy our powers of thinking, willing, etc ? 
 
 Dnes it destroy the exercise of those powers? 
 
Chap. I.] Of a Future Life. ^^J 
 
 Now the presumption in nature is always for the continuance of 
 what we know to exist ; and, therefore, the antecedent presumption, 
 in each of these three cases, is in favor of the negative. It is the 
 same kind of presumption in each case, but it is much stronger in the 
 two former than in the latter, because, though there are some appear- 
 ances that might lead us to conjecture that death may interrupt the 
 exercise of our living powers, there are none to favor the supposition 
 of its destroying them or ourselves. 
 
 We are bound, then, to presume that we shall continue through 
 and after death in the enjoyment and exercise of our present living 
 powers, unless something appears from the reason of the thing, <»r the 
 analogy of nature, to make us think that death destroys us, or those 
 powers, or, at least, the exercise of them. 
 
 Now, nothing of this sort can be concluded directly, at least with 
 respect to the two first questions, from the analogy of nature, because 
 death removes a being wholly from our experience ; and, so far as any 
 analogy can be drawn from other changes any way similar to death, 
 we know that they do not destroy the living agent or its powers, even 
 where (as in the case of sleep or a swoon) they suspend the exercise 
 of those powers. 
 
 Any presumption from the nature of the thing must be founded 
 upon- the probability that we are discerptible, and that our substance 
 is actually discerped by death, since all we know of death is the effect 
 which it produces in dissipating the grosser parts of our bodies. 
 
 Now, the absolute oneness of living agents cannot, indeed, be 
 proved by actual observation, but it seems to follow as a consequence 
 from what we know of the unity of consciousness ; and all that we 
 observe falls as a consequence in with it, and, at any rate, certainly 
 proves that our gross organized bodies are not ourselves; whence it 
 will follow, that we can have no reason to presume that what de- 
 stroys them must needs destroy us. 
 
 1. For we see by experience that men lose their limbs, their organs 
 of sense, and even the greatest part of their bodies, and yet remain 
 the same living agents. Nay, it is probable that most men do, in 
 their growth and decline from infancy to age, lose the whole frame 
 of their body more than once, and yet remain the same ; whence it 
 appears that, even though we are material, we cannot determine the 
 bulK of the living agent, nor, consequently, conclude that it is affected 
 by the dissolution of death. 
 
 2. Since the dissolution of systems of matter with which we are so 
 nearly connected as our bodies, is not the destruction of ourselves, we 
 can have no reason to tliink that we are any system of matter at all. 
 
 :. Miicj the Iv..-.-' "I organs or liaibs involve.-? not the (l?.->tru« tiou of 
 
6S Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 Ihe powers of perception or will, we must consider those limbs and 
 organs merely as instruments ; and then the destruction of those in- 
 struments will no more involve a presumption of the destruction of 
 the powers they ministered to, than the destruction of any other in- 
 struments of perception or motion, as an eye-glass or a walking-stick ; 
 while the phenomena of dreaming show us that we have, in some 
 cases, the power of receiving the impressions ordinarily conveyed by 
 the organs of sense, without the aid of those organs. 
 
 It is no objection to the previous arguments that they apply equal 
 iy to brutes as to men. 
 
 1. For, even if it were implied in the notion of their immortality, 
 that brutes should hereafter become rational and moral agents, this 
 is no more impossible than that a child should become such an agent, 
 which we know, in fact, to be true. 
 
 2. The economy of the world may require the future as much as 
 the present existence of brute natures, for any thing we know to the 
 contrary. 
 
 However, thei-e are other arguments for a future life to be enjoyed 
 by man, which do not hold equally for brutes. 
 
 We exist, at present, in two different states, sensation and reflec- 
 tion ; and though, for the exercise of our powers of sensation, we or- 
 dinarily (except in the case of dreaming) require the instruments of 
 bodily organs, we cannot perceive that our powers of reflection de- 
 pend upon the body, even for their present exercise ; nay, the ob- 
 serving that severe illness has no tendency to impair them, even up 
 to the point of death, makes it probable that death does not suspend 
 their exercise. 
 
 We can thus trace, to some extent, some of our living powers up 
 to death, and find them unaffected by it ; and, with respect to oth- 
 ers, it is not impossible that our present bodily organs, while they are 
 the means of giving us one sort of sensations, may be the impedi- 
 ment to receiving others ; or that the connection of the mind with 
 the present body may be the limitation of its perceptivity to a nar- 
 row sensorium, so that death may be a change analogous to birth, 
 Rnd introduce us to a higher state of being. — Fitzgerald] 
 
Chap. II.] Of the Government of God ^ 
 
 T 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 OP THE GOVERNMENT OF GOD BY REWARDS AND PUN' 
 ISHMENTS, AND PARTICULARLY OF THE LATTER. 
 
 HAT which makes the question concerning a fu- 
 _ ture life to be of so great importance to us is, our 
 caDacitv of happiness and misery. And The question 
 
 ^ ■' "^"^ ' . r '4. i. ofa fu tut e life— 
 
 that which makes the consideration oi it to therein impor- 
 be of so great importance to us is, the sup- 
 position of our happiness and misery hereafter depend- 
 ing upon our actions here. Without this, indeed, curi- 
 osity could not but sometimes bring a subject in which 
 we may be so highly interested, to our thoughts; espe- 
 cially upon the mortality of others, or the near prospect 
 of our own. But reasonable men would not take any 
 further thought about hereafter than what should hap- 
 pen thus occasionally to rise in their minds, if it were 
 certain that our future interest no way depended upon 
 our present behavior : whereas, on the contrary, if there 
 be ground, either from analogy or any thing else, to 
 think it does, then there is reason also for the most active 
 thought and solicitude to secure that interest ; to behave 
 so as that we may escape that misery, and obtain that 
 happiness, in another life, which we not only suppose 
 ourselves capable of, but which we apprehend also is 
 cm in our own power. And whether there be ground 
 for this last apprehension, certainly would deserve to be 
 most seriously considered, were there no other proof of 
 a future life and interest than that presumptive one 
 which the foregoing observations amount to. 
 
 2. Now, in the present state, all which we enjoy, and 
 
70 Analogv of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 a great part of what we suffer, is put in our own power. 
 
 For pleasure and pain are the consequences of our ac- 
 
 „ . tions ; and we are endued by the Author of 
 
 Here pleasure ' ^ ■' 
 
 and pain chiefly our nature with capacities of foreseeincr 
 
 In our power. ^ . ^ 
 
 these consequences. We find by experience 
 he does not so much as preserve our lives, exclusively 
 of our own care and attention to provide ourselves with, 
 and to make use of that sustenance, by which he has 
 appointed our lives shall be preserved, and without 
 which he has appointed they shall not be preserved at 
 all. And in general, we foresee that the external things 
 which are the objects of, our various passions, can 
 neither be obtained nor enjoyed without exerting our- 
 selves in such and such manners ; but by thus exerting 
 ourselves, we obtain and enjoy these objects in which 
 our natural good consists ; or by this means God gives 
 us the possession and enjoyment of them. I know not 
 that we have any one kind or degree of enjoyment but 
 by the means of our own actions. And by prudence and 
 care, we may, for the most part, pass our days in toler- 
 able ease and quiet : or, on the contrary, we may, by 
 rashness, ungoverned passion, willfulness, or even negli- 
 gence, make ourselves as miserable as ever we please. 
 And many do please to make themselves extremely mis- 
 erable ; that is, to do what they know beforehand will ren- 
 der them so. They follow those ways the fruit of which 
 they know, by instruction, example, experience, will be 
 disgrace, and poverty, and sickness, and untimely death. 
 This every one observes to be the general course of 
 things; though it is to be allowed, we cannot find by 
 experience, that all our sufferings are owing to our own 
 follies. 
 
 3. Why the Author of nature does not give his crea- 
 
 WhyhasGod turcs promiscuously such and such percep- 
 
 thusordered? ^^^^^^ without regard to their behavior ; why 
 
 he does not make them happy without the ins^rumen- 
 
Chap. II. ] Of the Government of God. 71 
 
 tality of their own actions, and prevent their bringing 
 any sufferings upon themselves — is another matter.* 
 Perhaps there may be some impossibilities in the nature 
 of things which we are unacquainted with, (chap, vii;) 
 
 * [Butler here hints at several possible solutions of the old athe- 
 iitical dilemma. God prevents not evil, either because he cannot, or 
 because he w^ill not. If he cannot, he is not Almighty: if he will 
 not, he is not All-good. Butler shows us that neither conclusion can 
 be safely drawn. The supposition that God cannot remove these 
 evils does not necessarily imply any defect in power ; because, for 
 any thing we know to the contrary, the removal of them might in- 
 volve a contradiction, and not to be able to do what is self-contra- 
 dictory and impossible in the notion of it, is plainly no limitation of 
 power. The supposition that, though he can, he will not remove 
 them, does not necessarily imply a defect of benevolence, even tak- 
 ing benevolence in the sense of a simple desire of causing the great- 
 est possible amount of happiness. Because it is possible that the 
 happiness resulting from a good use made of a state of trial by free 
 beings may, in the namre of it, be so much greater than what would 
 result from any other method, as to make the sum of happiness so 
 obtained, even when all the present incidental miseries have been 
 deducted from it, larger than could be procured by providing against 
 their contingency. Nor, even supposing that God's not choosing to 
 remove the sources of these evils implied a defect of benevolence in 
 the sense explained above, would it be certain that it implied a de- 
 fect of benevolence, as it is a real perfection. For supreme benev- 
 olence may not be a disposition simply to make beings happy, but to 
 make good beings happy. — F.] 
 
 [Some minds have great perplexity and trouble over the origin of 
 evil and the permission of sin, and cannot see how they are recon- 
 ciled with the Divine wisdom and goodness. God certainly did not 
 will any sin and its consequent evil, but he did choose to create man 
 and in so doing to incur their liability. A voluntary being can 
 sin, and while in the free exercise of his powers cannot be prevented 
 Ly any external force .from so doing. The only way God could 
 prevent sin would be to bind nature fast in fate and not leave free the 
 huma': or any other will. 
 
 The origin of evil involves no mysteiy in the Divine government, 
 but is to be ascribed to the wickedness of voluntary beings, which 
 God does all he consistently can to prevent. He has provided a 
 remedy for sin, offered forgiveness to all, and provided a compensa- 
 
72 Analogy of Religion. lPart I. 
 
 or less happiness, it may be, and upon the whole, would 
 be produced by such a method of conduct than is by 
 the present : or, perhaps, Divine goodness, with which, 
 if I mistake not, we make very free in our speculations, 
 may not be a bare single disposition to produce hap- 
 piness, but a disposition to make the good, the faithful, 
 the honest man happy. Perhaps an infinitely perfect 
 Mind may be pleased with seeing his creatures behave 
 suitably to the nature which he has given them ; to the 
 relations which he has placed them in to each other ; and 
 to that which they stand in to himself; that relation to 
 himself, which, during their existence, is even necessary;* 
 and which is the most important one of all. Perhaps, 1 
 say, an infinitely perfect Mind may be pleased with this 
 moral piety of moral agents, in and for itself, as well as 
 upon account of its being essentially conducive to the 
 happiness of his creation. Or the whole end for which 
 God made, and thus governs the world, may be utterly 
 beyond the reach of our faculties : there may be some- 
 what in it as impossible for us to have any conception 
 of, as for a blind man to have a conception of colors. 
 But however this may be, it is certainly matter of uni- 
 versal experience, that the general method of Divine 
 administration is, forevvarning us, or giving us capaci- 
 ties to foresee, with more or less clearness, that if we 
 act so and so, we shall have such enjoyments ; if so and so, 
 
 tion for those who suffer in consequence of others' folly and crime. 
 All who will accept his favor may be saved. 
 
 When we ask was it wise to permit evil, we ask was it wise to create 
 free agents ; surely it will be admitted, that, on the whole, good will 
 resul' to the universe and glory to God from the existence of angeis 
 and mtR 
 
 Evil, in the sense of mistakes resulting from ignorance and imper- 
 fection, is necessarily connected with a limited progressive being. 
 We presume no one will claim it were better such being did not exist.] 
 
 * [Our relation to God is necessary because we are his creatures, 
 but our relation to other beings God might-change.] 
 
Chap. II.] Of the Government of God. 73 
 
 such sufferings; and giving us those enjoyments, and mak- 
 ing us feel those sufferings, in consequence of our actions. 
 4. " But all this is to be ascribed to the general course 
 of nature."* True. This is the very thing which I 
 am observing. It is to be ascribed to the objection— al 
 general course of nature; that is, not surely cribed" t^ SJe 
 to the words or ideas, course of natuj-e, but course of nature 
 to Him who appointed it, and put things into it: or to 
 a course of operation, from its uniformity or constancy, 
 called natural, (pp. 64, 65,) and which necessarily im- 
 plies an operating agent. For when men find them- 
 selves necessitated to confess an author of nature, or 
 
 * The terms "nature " and course of nature are used in various 
 senses. Some affirm that the frame of nature is a machine construct- 
 ed so as to go on of itself, according to the fixed laws of its mecha- 
 nism, so as to require no further act in the Deity but that which orin i- 
 nally created it. See Law's Notes on King's Origin of Evil, chap, v, 
 g 5, sub. 4, note 75. 
 
 This representation of the world as a great machine, going on 
 without God's agency, as a clock goes without the assistance of the 
 clock maker, is the notion of materialism, and excludes God's gov- 
 ernment from the world. The believers of this theory regard the 
 forces of nature as inhering in matter. Others, as does Dr. Clarke, 
 regard the forces of nature as the immediate and continual operation 
 of God or intermediate spirits upon matter. 
 
 " The tei-ms nature, and powers of nature, and course of nature, and 
 the like, are nothing but empty words, and signify merely that a 
 thing usually or frequently comes to pass. The raising the human 
 body out of the dust of the earth, we call a miracle ; the generation 
 of a human body in the ordinary way we call natural, for no other 
 reason but because the power of God effects, one usually, the other 
 unusually. The judden stoppage of the sun (or earth) we call a mir- 
 acle, the continual motion of the sun (or earth) we call natural, for 
 '.he very same reason only, of the one being usual and the other un- 
 usual. Did men rise usually out of the grave, as corn grows out of 
 seed sown, we should certainly call that also natural ; and did the sun 
 (or earth) constantly stand still, we should tlien think that to be nat- 
 ural, and its motion, at any time, would be miraculous."' — Clarke's 
 Controversy with Leibnitz, p. 351, Fifth Reply, 107-109. Modified 
 from Fitzj-eni.d's note. 
 
74 Analogy of Religion. LPart I. 
 
 that God is the natural governor of the world, they must 
 not deny this again, because his government is uniform ; 
 they must not deny that he does all things at all, because 
 he does them constantly ; because the effects of his acting 
 are permanent, whether his acting be so or not ; though 
 there is no reason to think it is not. In short, every 
 man, in every thing he does, naturally acts upon the 
 forethought and apprehension of avoiding evil, or ob- 
 taining good : and if the natural course of things be the 
 appointment of God, and our natural faculties of knowl- 
 edge and experience are given us by him, then the good 
 and bad consequences which follow our actions are his 
 appointment, and our foresight of those consequences is 
 a warning given us by him how we are to act. 
 
 5. " Is the pleasure, tlien, naturally accompanying 
 every particular gratification of passion, intended to put 
 
 us upon o!;ratifying ourselves in every such 
 
 Is ploasure a . . - 
 
 Kv-ison for gi-at- particular instance, and as a reward to us 
 
 ilication'/ ■, ■ ^ ,, -kt • t -vt • • 
 
 for so domg ? No, certamly. Nor is it to 
 be said that our eyes were naturally intended to give us 
 the sight of each particular object to which they do or 
 can extend ; objects which are destructive of them, or 
 which, for any other reason, it may become us to turn 
 our eyes from. Yet there is no doubt but that our eyes 
 were intended for us to see with. So neither is there 
 any doubt but that the foreseen pleasures and pains be- 
 longing to the passions, were intended, in general, to 
 induce mankind to act in such and such manners.* 
 
 6. Now from this general observation, obvious to 
 every one, that God has given us to understand he has 
 appointed satisfaction and delight to be the consequences 
 
 * [Man has various faculties of mind and body whose office and 
 design will be apparent on examination. The ultimate design of the 
 exercise of their powers is not in any case mere animal gratification, 
 but intellectual and moral impi-ovement and happiness. The per- 
 version of these powers is sin, and causes shame and misery,] 
 
Chap. II.] Of the Government of God. 75 
 
 of our acting in one manner, and pain and uneasiness of 
 our acting in another, and of our not acting at all ; and 
 that we find the consequences, which we ^ 
 
 , we are uuder 
 
 were beforehand informed of, uniformly to God's povern- 
 
 - tnent of rewards 
 
 follow ; we may learn that we are at present and puuish- 
 
 ,, . ^ . . ^ . raents. 
 
 actually under his government, in the strict- 
 est and most proper sense ; in such a sense, as that he 
 rewards and punishes us for our actions. An author of 
 nature being supposed, it is not so much a deduction of 
 reason as a matter of experience that we are thus under 
 his government; under his government, in the same 
 sense as we are under the government of civil magis- 
 trates. Because the annexing pleasure to some actions, 
 and pain to others, in our power to do or forbear, and 
 giving notice of this appointment beforehand to those 
 whom it concerns, is the proper formal notion of gov- 
 ernment. Whether the pleasure or pain which thus fol- 
 lows upon our behavior be owing to .the Author of na- 
 ture's acting upon us every moment which we feel it, 
 or to his having at once contrived and executed his own 
 part in the plan of the world, makes no alteration as to 
 the matter before us. For if civil magistrates could 
 make the sanctions of their laws take place, without in- 
 terposing at all, after they had passed them ; without 
 a trial, and the formalities of an execution : if they were 
 able to make their laws execute themselves, or every 
 offender to execute them upon himself, we should be 
 just in the same sense under their government then, as 
 we are now; but in a much higher degree, and more 
 perfect manner. 
 
 Vain is the ridicule with which one foresees some 
 persons will divert themselves, upon find- 
 
 ; . . . ^ Eidicule rei 
 
 ing lesser pains considered as instances of ative to little 
 
 ... . , ,„, . ., ... pains vaiu. 
 
 divine punishment. Ihere is no possibility 
 
 of answering or evading the general thing here intended, 
 
 without denying all final causes. For final causes being 
 
'jG Analogy of Religion. [Part L 
 
 admitted, the pleasures and pains now mentioned must 
 be admitted too, as instances of them. And if they are 
 — if God annexes delight to some actions and uneasiness 
 to others, with an apparent design to induce us to act 
 so and so — then he not only dispenses happiness and 
 misery, but also rewards and punishes actions. If, for 
 example, the pain which we feel upon doing what tends 
 to the destruction of our bodies, suppose upon too near 
 approaches to fire, or upon wounding ourselves, be ap- 
 pointed by the Author of nature to prevent our doing 
 what thus tends to our destruction ; this is altogether as 
 much an instance of his punishing our actions, and con- 
 sequently of our being under his government, as declar- 
 ing, by a voice from heaven, that if we acted so he 
 would inflict such pain upon us, and inflicting it whether 
 it be greater or less, 
 
 7. Thus we find, that the true notion or conception 
 of the Author of nature is that of a master or governor, 
 True notion of P^ior to the consideration of his moral attri- 
 ^^^' butes. The fact of our case, which we find 
 
 by experience, is, that he actually exercises dominion or 
 government over us at present, by rewarding and pun- 
 ishing us for our actions, in as strict and proper a sense 
 of these words, and even in the same sense as children, 
 servants, subjects, are rewarded and punished by those 
 who govern them. 
 
 And thus the whole analogy of nature — the whole 
 present course of things — most fully shows, that there is 
 nothing incredible in the general doctrine of religion, 
 that God will reward and punish men for their actions 
 hereafter; nothing incredible, I mean, arising out of the 
 notion of rewarding and punishing, for the whole course 
 of nature is a present instance* of his exercising that 
 government over us which implies in it rewarding and 
 punishing. 
 
Chap. I I.J Of the Government of God. "j"] 
 
 8. But, as divine punishment is what men chiefly ob- 
 ject against, and are most unwilling to allow, it may be 
 proper to mention some circumstances in Analogy be- 
 the natural course of punishments at pres- S^ftiturTpun- 
 ent, which are analogous to what religion ^s^™^^^*- 
 teaches us concerning a future state of punishment ; in- 
 deed, so analogous, that as they add a further credibil- 
 ity to it, so they cannot but raise a most serious appre- 
 hension of it in those who will attend to them. 
 
 It has been now observed, that such and such miseries 
 naturally follow such and such actions of imprudence 
 and willfulness, as well as actions more commonly and 
 more distinctly considered as vicious ; and that these 
 consequences, when they may be foreseen, are properly 
 ' natural punishments annexed to such actions. For the 
 general thing here insisted upon is, not that we see a 
 great deal of misery in the world, but a great deal which 
 men bring upon themselves by their own behavior, which 
 they might have foreseen and avoided. Now the cir- 
 cumstances of these natural punishments particularly 
 deserving our attention are such as these: That often- 
 times they follow, or are inflicted in consequence of, 
 actions which procure many present advantages, and are 
 accompanied with much present pleasure ; for instance, 
 sickness'and untimely death is the consequence of in- 
 temperance, though accompanied with the highest mirth 
 and jollity : That these punishments are often much 
 greater than the advantages or pleasures obtained by 
 the actions of which they are the punishments or conse- 
 quences : That though we may imagine a constitution 
 of nature in which these natural punishments, which are 
 in fact to follow, would follow immediately upon such 
 actions being done, or very soon after ; we find, on the 
 contrary, in our world, that they are often delayed a 
 great while, sometimes even till long after the actions 
 occasioning them are forgotten ; so that the constitution 
 
yS Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 of nature is such, that delay of punishment is no sort or 
 degree of presumption of final impunity : That after 
 such delay, these natural punishments or miseries often 
 come, not by degrees, but suddenly, with violence, and 
 at once — however, the chief misery often does : That as 
 certainty of such distant misery following such actions 
 is never afforded persons, so perhaps during the actions, 
 they have seldom a distinct full expectation of its fol- 
 lowing:* and many times the case is only thus, that 
 they see in general, or may see, the credibility, that in- 
 temperance, suppose, will bring after it diseases; civil 
 crimes, civil punishments ; when yet the real probability 
 often is, that they shall escape : but things notwithstand- 
 ing take their destined course, and the misery inevitably 
 follows at its appointed time, in very many of these 
 cases. Thus also thousrh youth may be al- 
 thoughtlessness leged as an excuse for rashness and folly, as 
 
 no excuse. . n i i i i i i 
 
 being naturally thoughtless, and not clearly 
 foreseeing all the consequences of being untractable and 
 profligate ; this does not hinder but that these conse- 
 quences follow, and are grievously felt throughout the 
 whole course of mature life. Habits contracted, even 
 in that age, are often utter ruin : and men's success in 
 the world, not only in the common sense of worldly suc- 
 cess, but their real happiness and misery, depends in a 
 great degree, and in various ways, upon the manner in 
 which they pass their youth ; which consequences they, 
 for the most part, neglect to consider, and perhaps sel- 
 dom can properly be said to believe beforehand. It 
 requires also to be mentioned, that in numberless cases 
 the natural course of things affords us opportunities for 
 procuring advantages to ourselves at certain times 
 which we cannot procure when we will ; nor ever recall 
 the opportunities, if we have neglected them. Indeed, 
 the general course of nature is an example of this. If. 
 * See part i, chap. vi. 
 
Chap. II. J Of the Government of God. 79 
 
 during the opportunity of youth, persons are indocile 
 and self-willed, they inevitably suffer in their future life 
 for want of those acquirements which they neglected 
 the natural season of attaining. If the husbandman lets 
 his seed-time pass without sowing, the whole year is 
 lost to him beyond recovery. In like manner, though 
 after men have been guilty of folly and extravagance up 
 to a certain degree, it is often in their power, for instance, 
 to retrieve their affairs, to recover their health and char- 
 acter, at least in good measure ; yet real reformation 
 is, in many cases, of no avail at all toward ^eai reforma- 
 preventing the miseries, poverty, sickness, always ^^preveSt 
 infamy, naturally annexed to folly and ex- "^^^^"^y- 
 travagance, exceeding that degree. There is a certain 
 bound to imprudence and misbehavior, which being 
 transgressed, there remains no place for repentance in 
 the natural course of things. It is, further, very much 
 to be remarked, that neglects from inconsiderateness, 
 want of attention,* not looking about us to see what we 
 have to do, are often attended with consequences alto- 
 gether as dreadful as any active misbehavior from the 
 most extravagant passion. And lastly, civil government 
 being natural, the punishments of it are so too ; and 
 some of these punishments are capital, as the effects of 
 a dissolute course of pleasure are often mortal. So that 
 many natural punishments are final \ to him who incurs 
 
 * Pari ii, chap. vi. 
 
 f The general consideration of a future state of punishment most 
 evidently belongs to the subject of natural religion. But if any of 
 these reflections should be thought to relate more peculiarly to this 
 d >i:trine as taught in Scripture, the reader is desired to observe that 
 Gentile writers, both moralists and poets, speak of the future pun- 
 ishment of the wicked, both as to the duration and degree of it, in a 
 like manner of expression and description as the Scripture does. So 
 that all which can positively be asserted to be matter of mere revela- 
 tion, with regard to this doctrine, seems to be, that the great distinc- 
 tion between the righteous and the wicked shall be made at the end 
 
So Analogy of ReligiOxN. [Part 1. 
 
 them if considered only in his temporal capacity ; and 
 seem inflicted by natural appointment, either to remove 
 the offender out of the way of being further mischiev- 
 ous, or as an example, though frequently a disregarded 
 one, to those who are left behind. 
 
 9. These things are not what we call accidental, or to 
 be met with only now and then; but they are things ot 
 These are es- every day's experience; they proceed from 
 seatiai analogies, gg^eral laws, very general ones, by which 
 God governs the world, in the natural course of his prov- 
 idence.* And they are so analogous to what religion 
 teaches us concerning the future punishment of the 
 wicked, so much of a piece with it, that both would 
 naturally be expressed in the very same words and man- 
 ner of description. In the book of Proverbs, for in- 
 stance. Wisdom is introduced as frequenting the most 
 
 of this world ; that each shall thejt receive according to his deserts. 
 Reason did, as it well might, conclude that it should finally, and 
 upon the whole, be well with the righteous and ill with the wicked ; 
 but it could not be determined, upon any principles of reason, wheth- 
 er human creatures might not have been appointed to pass through 
 other states of life and being before that distributive justice should, 
 finally and effectually, take place. Revelation teaches us, that the 
 next state of things after the present is appointed for the execution of 
 this justice ; that it shall be no longer delayed ; but the mystery of 
 God, the great mystery of his suffering vice and confusion to prevail, 
 shall then be Jinished ; and he Mall take to hint his great power, and 
 will reign, by rendering to every one according to his works. 
 
 * [The paragraph of this chapter where the enumeration of these 
 resemblances is given, presents us with one of the finest triumphs of 
 the analogical argument, and in which its power as a weapon of de-^ 
 fense appears to great advantage, cutting down, as with a scythe, a 
 whole army of these objections, which are most frequent in the 
 mouths of adversaries, being not only the most plausible in them- 
 selves, but the most formidable in point of effect, from a certain 
 tone of generous denunciation against all arbitrary and tyrannical 
 will in which they are propounded, and so as to associate the 
 semblance of a protesting and moral indignancy with the infidel 
 cause. — Chalmers.] 
 
Chap. II.] Of the Government of God. 8i 
 
 public places of resort, and as rejected when she offers 
 herself as the natural appointed guide of human life. 
 " How long ' speaking to those who are passing through 
 it, " how long:, ye simple ones, will ye love folly, and the 
 scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowl- 
 edge ? Turn ye at my reproof. Behold, I will pour out 
 my Spirit upon you, I will make known my words unto 
 you." But upon being neglected, " Because I have 
 called and ye refused; I have stretched out my hand, 
 and no man regarded ; but ye have set at naught all my 
 cc.unsel, and would none of my reproof: I also will 
 laugh at your calamity; I will mock when your feai 
 cometh ; when your fear cometh as a desolation, and your 
 destruction cometh as a whirlwind ; when distress and 
 anguish cometh upon you. Then shall they call upon 
 me, but I will not answer ; they shall seek me early, but 
 they shall not find me." This passage, everyone sees, 
 is poetical, and some parts of it are highly figurative ; 
 but their meaning is obvious. And the thing intended 
 is expressed more literally in the following v/ords : " For 
 that they hated knowledge, and did not choose the fear 
 of the Lord. . . . Therefore shall they eat of the fruit 
 of their own way, and be filled with their own devices. 
 For the security of the simple shall slay them, and 
 the prosperity of fools shall destroy them." And the 
 whole passage is so equally applicable to what we ex- 
 perience in the present world concerning the conse- 
 quences of men's actions, and to what religion teaches 
 us is to be expected in another, that it may be questioned 
 vhich of the two was principally intended. 
 
 ic Indeed, when one has been recollecting the prop- 
 er proofs of a future state of rewards and punishments, 
 nothing, methinks, can give one so sensible present pun- 
 an apprehension of the latter, or representa- ^vSTi^a^/the 
 tion of it to the mind, as observing that ^"ture. 
 after the many disregarded checks, admonitions, and 
 
^ 
 
 S2 Analogy of Religion. LPart I. 
 
 warnings which people meet with in the ways of vice, 
 and folly, and extravagance : warnings from their very 
 nature ; from the examples of others ; from the lesser 
 inconveniences which they bring upon themselves ; from 
 the instructions of wise and virtuous men ; after these 
 have been long despised, scorned, ridiculed ; after the 
 chief bad consequences, temporal consequences, of their 
 follies, have been delayed for a great while ; at length 
 they break in irresistibly, like an armed force ; repent- 
 ance is too late to relieve, and can serve only to aggra- 
 vate their distress ; the case is become desperate ; and 
 poverty and sickness, remorse and anguish, infamy and 
 death, the effects of their own doings, overwhelm them 
 beyond possibility of remedy or escape. This is an 
 account of what is in fact the general constitution of 
 nature. 
 
 II. It is not in any sort meant, that according to 
 what appears at present of the natural course of things, 
 
 Theymeetob- men are always uniformly punished \r\ pro- 
 Im-eTvmSi-^'^" portion to their misbehavior; but that there 
 ments. ^j.^ ygj-y many instances of misbehavior pun- 
 
 ished in the several ways now mentioned, and verj 
 dreadful instances too, sufficient to show what the law.» 
 of the universe may admit ; and if thoroughly considered 1^^^ 
 sufficient fully to answer all objections against the cred- ^ 
 ibility of a future state of punishments from any imagina- 
 tions that the frailty of our nature and external tempta- 
 tions, almost annihilate the sfuilt of human vices : as 
 well as objections of another sort ; from necessity ; fro.n 
 suppositions that the will of an infinite being cannot 
 be contradicted ; or that he must be incapable of offenst 
 and provocation.* 
 
 Such reflec- 12. Reflections of this kind are not with- 
 tions cause ter- ^^^^ their terrors to serious persons, the most 
 tint to repress ^^.^g from enthusiasm, and of the greatest 
 * See chap, iv and vi. 
 
CiiAP. II. J Of the Government of God. 83 
 
 strength of mind ; but it is fit^things be stated and con- ^tiuM 
 sidered as they really are. And there is, in the present 
 age,* a certain fearlessness with regard to what may be 
 hereafter under the government of God, which nothing 
 but a universally acknowledged deinonstration on the 
 side of Atheism can justify, and which makes it quite 
 necess.'iry that men be reminded and, if possible, made 
 to fee), that there is no sort of ground for being thus 
 pres-imptuous, even upon the most skeptical principles. 
 For may it not be said of any person, upon his being 
 born into the world, he may behave so as to be of no 
 service to it, but by being made an example of the woe- 
 ful effects of vice and folly; that he may, as any one 
 may, if he will, incur an infamous execution from the 
 hands of civil justice; or in some other course of ex- 
 travagance shorten his days ; or bring upon himself in- 
 famy and diseases worse than death 1 So that it had 
 been better for him, even with regard to the present 
 world, that he had never been born. And is there any 
 pretense of reason for people to think themselves secure, 
 and talk as if they had certain proof, that let then, act 
 as licentiously as they will, there can be nothing analo- 
 gous to this with regard to a future and more general 
 interest, under the providence and government of the 
 same God ? 
 
 * [The age immediately following the corrupt reign of Charles II, 
 For a vivid picture of the state of morals in his reign see Macaulay'a 
 Historj' of England, vol. i, p. 140. — Champlin.] 
 
84 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 A 
 
 . CHAPTER III. 
 
 OF THE MORAL GOVERNMENT OF GOD.* 
 
 S the manifold appearance of design and of final 
 causes in the constitution of the world prove it to 
 be the work of an intelligent mind, so the 
 
 Final causes . _ 
 
 piw e siL inteiii- particular final causes of pleasure and pain, 
 
 geni Govornor. ,. ., , . . 
 
 distributed among his creatures, prove that 
 they are under his government — what may be called, his 
 
 * [The subject of the present chapter is as distinct from that of the 
 former, as the generic idea of a government is distinct from the more 
 particular idea of it as possessed of a certain character, or as being of 
 a certain kind and species. If certain actions are followed up by 
 pleasure and others by pain, and these are known beforehand, so 
 that the agent can foresee the consequence of his doings, even as he 
 would have done if under a proclaimed law, which told at the same 
 time of its own rewards and its own penalties, these are enough of 
 themselves to constitute a government having its regulations which 
 are known, and its sanctions which are executed. So much for gov- 
 ernment in the general ; but should it be found among these general 
 phenomena, that those actions which are righteous were followed up 
 by pleasure, and those actions which are wicked were followed up by 
 pain, this would present us with a moral government enveloped, as 
 it were, in the general and natural ; and it is to the manifestations 
 of such a government in the course and constitution of nature that 
 the author now addresses his observations. — Chalmers.] 
 
 [This chapter, more than any other, carries the force of positive ar« 
 gum.ent. If in this world we have proofs that God is a moral gov- 
 ernor, then in order to evince that we shall be under moral govern- 
 ment hereafter, we have only to supply an intermediate consideration, 
 namely, that God must be unchangeable. The argument assumes a 
 substantive form : because admitted facts as to this world, exhibiting 
 the very principles on which God's government goes at present, com- 
 pel us not only to suppose that the principles of God's government 
 will remain, but to /'tZ/Vrv so. — M.vi.coM.J 
 
CfiAP. III.] Moral Government of God. 85 
 
 natural government of creatures endued with sense and 
 reason. This, however, implies somewhat more than 
 seems usually attended to when we speak of God's nat- 
 ural government of the world. It implies government 
 of the very same kind with that which a master exer- 
 cises over his servants, or a civil magistrate over his 
 subjects. These latter instances of final causes as really 
 prove an intelligent governor of the world, in the sen^e 
 now mentioned, and before (chap, ii) distinctly treated 
 of, as any other instances of final causes prove an intel- 
 ligent maker of it. 
 
 But this alone does not appear, at first sight, to de- 
 termine any thing certainly concerning the moral char- 
 acter of the Author of nature, considered in 
 
 Not necessa- 
 
 this relation of governor ; does not ascertain riiyamoraigov- 
 
 . ernor. 
 
 his government to be moral, or prove that 
 he is the righteous Judge of the world. Moral govern- 
 ment consists, not barely in rewarding and punishing 
 men for their actions, which the most tyrannical person 
 may do ; but in rewarding the righteous and punishing 
 the wicked ; in rendering to men according to their ac- 
 tions, considered as good or evil. And the perfection 
 of moral government consists in doing this, with regard 
 to all intelligent creatures, in an exact proportion to 
 their personal merits or demerits. 
 
 2. Some men seem to think the only character of the 
 Author of nature to be that of simple absolute benevo- 
 lence. This, considered as a principle of ood not sim- 
 action, and infinite in degree, is a disposi- bu\'^a^iiLSteo!.s 
 tior. to produce the greatest possible happi- eo^ernor. 
 ness, without regard to persons' behavior, otherwise 
 than as such regard would produce higher degrees of it. 
 And supposing this to be the only character of God, 
 veracity and justice in him would be nothing but be- 
 nevolence conducted by wisdom. Now surely this 
 ought not to be asserted unless it can be proved ; for 
 
86 Analogy of Religion. LPart I. 
 
 we should speak with cautious reverence upon such a 
 subject. And whether it can be proved cr not, is not 
 the thing here to be inquired into; but whether, in tlie 
 constitution and conduct of the world, a righteous gov- 
 ernment be not discernibly planned out ; whic i nc^ces- 
 sarily implies a righteous governor. There may possi- 
 bly be in the creation beings to whom the Author of 
 nature manifests himself under this most amiable ^f all 
 characters, this of infinite absolute benevolence ; foi it 
 is the most amiable, supposing it not, as perhaps it is 
 not, incompatible with justice : but he manifests him- 
 self to us under the character of a righteous governor. 
 He may, consistently with this, be simply and absolutely 
 benevolent, in the sense now explained ; but he is, for 
 he has given us a proof in the constitution and conduct 
 of the world that he is, a governor over servants, as he 
 rewards and punishes us for our actions. And in the 
 constitution and conduct of it, he may also have given, 
 besides the reason of the thing, and the natural presages 
 of conscience, clear and distinct intimations that his 
 government is righteous or moral — clear to such as 
 think the nature of it deserving their attention, and yet 
 not to every careless person who casts a transient reflec- 
 tion upon the subject.* 
 This govern- 3- But it is particularly to be observed that, 
 
 meiit is chiedv ^u j • • i. i • u 
 
 moral but not ^he divine government, which wc experience 
 porect. ourselves under in the present state, taken 
 
 * The objections against religion, from the evidence of it not being 
 universal, nor so strong as might possibly have been, may be urged 
 against natural religion as vv^ell as against revealed. And therefore 
 the consideration of them belongs to the first part of this 'Ireatise, 
 as well as the second. But as these objections are chiefly urged 
 against revealed religion, I chose to consider them in the second 
 part. And the answer to them there, (chap, vi,) as urged against 
 Christianity, being almost equally applicable to them as urged against 
 the religion of nature ; to avoid repetition, the reader is referred to 
 that chapter. 
 
Chap. III.] Moral Government of God. Sy 
 
 alone, is allowed not to be the perfection of moral gov- 
 ernment.* And yet this by no means hinders, but that 
 there ma}- be somewhat, be it more or less, truly moral 
 in it. A righteous government may plainly appear to be 
 carried on to some degree ; enough to give us the appre- 
 hension that it shall be completed, or carried on to that 
 degree of perfection which religion teaches us it shall ; 
 but which cannot appear, till much more of the divine 
 administration be seen than can in the present life. 
 And the design of this chapter is to inquire, how far this 
 is the case ; how far, over and above the moral nature 
 (Dissertation II) which God has given us, and our natu- 
 ral notion of him, as righteous governor of those his 
 creatures to whom he has given this nature, (chap, vi ;) 
 I say how far, besides this, the principles and beginnings 
 of a moral government over the world may be discerned, 
 notwithstanding and amid all the confusion and dis- 
 order of it. 
 
 4. Now, one might mention here, what has Difficuityofihe 
 
 , - . , - , . argument from 
 
 been often urged with great lorce, that m the greater hap- 
 
 11 • J J.- c J.- piness of virtue. 
 
 general less uneasmess and more satisfaction 
 
 are the natural consequences f of a virtuous than of a 
 
 * [Butler seems here to indicate the distinction between religious 
 and irreligious optimism. Irreligious optimism considers \h.e present 
 state of things as absolutely the best. Religious optimism considers 
 it as imperfect in itself, but necessar}' for bringing about that state 
 which is 'absolutely the best possible. But this best possible must, as 
 Bishop Hamilton (on the Attributes, p. 1S9) has very tnily re- 
 marked, be understood with reference to such beings as 7?iefi ; not to 
 mean the best possible scheme of created things, because no such 
 scheme can be conceived. The difference between finite and infinite 
 peifection must always be infinite, so that however excellent we may 
 suppose any one scheme of created things, there will still remain the 
 possibility of another more perfect, in infinitum. See on the general 
 -subject of the two schemes of optimism, Warburton's Reply to Cron- 
 saz' Criticist?i on Pope, and Johnson's Review of Jenyn's Essay upon 
 the Origin of Evil. — F.] 
 
 \ See Lord Shaftesbury's Inquiry Concerning Virtue, part ii. 
 
So Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 vicious course of life, in the present state, as an instance" 
 of a moral government established in nature ; an instance 
 of it, collected from experience and present matter of fact. 
 But it must be owned a thing of difficulty to weigh 
 and balance pleasures and uneasinesses, each among 
 themselves, and also against each other, so as to make 
 an estimate, with any exactness, of the overplus of hap- 
 piness on the side of virtue. And it is not impossible, 
 that, amid the infinite disorders of the world, there may 
 be exceptions to the happiness of virtue, even with re- 
 gard to those persons whose course of life, from their 
 youth up, has been blameless ; and more with regard to 
 those who have gone on for some time in the ways of 
 vice, and have afterward reformed. For suppose an in- 
 stance of the latter case ; a person with his passions in- 
 flamed, his natural faculties of self-government impaired 
 by habits of indulgence, and with all his vices about 
 him, like so many harpies, craving for their accustomed 
 gratification, — who can say how long it might be before 
 such a person would find more satisfaction in the rea- 
 sonableness and present good consequences of virtue, 
 than difficulties and self-denial in the restraints of it? 
 Experience also shows, that men can, to a great degree, get 
 over their sense of shame, so as that by professing them- 
 selves to be without principle, and avowing even direct 
 villainy, they can support themselves against the infamy 
 of it. But as the ill actions of any one will probably be 
 more talked of, and oftener thrown in his way, upon his 
 reformation ; so the infamy of them will be much more 
 felt, after the natural sense of virtue and of honor is re- 
 covered. Uneasiness of this kind ought indeed to be 
 put to the account of former vices ; yet it will be said, 
 they are in part the consequences of reformation. Still 
 I am far from allowing it doubtful whether virtue, upon 
 the whole, be happier than vice in the present world : 
 but if it were, yet the beginnings of a righteous admin- 
 
CrAP. III.] Moral Government of God. 89 
 
 istration may, beyond all question, be found in nature, 
 if we will attentively inquire after them. And, 
 
 5. I. In whatever manner the notion of God's moral 
 government over the world might be treated, if it did 
 not a-Dpear whether he were, in a proper GodnaturaUya 
 sens?;' our governor at all; yet when it is ^^orai governor- 
 certain matter of experience, that he does manifest him-; 
 self to us under the character of a governor, in the sense 
 explained, (chap, ii,) it must deserve to be considered 
 whether there be not reason to apprehend that he may 
 be a righteous or moral governor. Since it appears to 
 be fact, that God does govern mankind by the method 
 of rewards and punishments, according to some settled 
 rules of distribution, it is surely a question to be asked, 
 What presumption is there against his finally rewarding 
 and punishing them according to this particular rule, 
 namely, as they act reasonably or unreasonably, virtu- 
 ously or viciously .'' since rendering man happy or mis- 
 erable by this rule certainly falls in, much more falls in, 
 with our natural apprehensions and sense of things, than 
 doing so by any other rule whatever; since rewarding 
 and punishing actions by any other rule would appear 
 much harder to be accounted for by minds formed as 
 he has formed ours. Be the evidence of religion then 
 more or less clear, the expectation which it raises m us 
 that the righteous shall, upon the whole, be happy, and 
 the wicked miserable, cannot, however, possibly be con- 
 sidered as absurd or chimerical ; because it is no more 
 than an expectation that a method of government al- 
 ready begun shall be carried on — the method of reward- 
 ing and punishing actions ; and shall be carried on by a 
 particular rule, which unavoidably appears to us, at first 
 sight, more natural than any other, the rule which we 
 call Distributive Justice. Nor, 
 
 6. II. Ought' it to be entirely passed over, that tran- 
 quillity, satisfaction, and external advantages, being the 
 
QO Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 natMial consequences of prudent management of our- 
 „ , selves and our affairs; and rashness, profli- 
 
 Pnuience re- _ _^ ^ 
 
 warded ; impru- gate Rcdisience, and willful folly, bringing 
 
 dence punished. '^ , • • ' ^- 
 
 after them many inconveniences and suffer- 
 ings, these afford instances of a right constitution of 
 nature : as the correction of children, for their own 
 sakes and by way of example, when they run into dan- 
 ger or hurt themselves, is a part of right education. 
 And thus, that God governs the world by general fixed 
 laws; that he has endued us with capacities of re- 
 flecting upon this constitution of things, and foreseeing 
 the good and bad consequences of our behavior, plainly 
 implies some sort of moral government ; since from such 
 a constitution of things it cannot but follow that pru- 
 dence and imprudence, which are of the nature of virtue 
 and vice,* must be, as they are, respectively rewarded 
 and punished. 
 
 7. III. From the natural course of things, vicious ac- 
 tions are, to a great degree, actually punished as mis- 
 chievous to societv; and besides punish- 
 
 Soctietv pun- ^\ • n-^ 
 
 ishes aiuice as ment actually inflicted upon this account, 
 
 hurtful. , . . ' . , , . 
 
 there is also the fear and apprehension of it 
 in those persons whose crimes have rendered them ob- <u 
 
 noxious to it, in case of a discovery ; this state of fear ^aXCAvO; 
 being itself often a very considerable punishment. The 
 natural fear and apprehension of it, too, which restrains 
 from such crimes, is a declaration of nature against 
 them. It is necessary to the very being of society that 
 vices destructive of it should be punished as being : j 
 the vices of falsehood, injustice, cruelty: which punish- 
 ment therefore is as natural as society, and so is an in- 
 stance of a kind of moral government, naturally estab- 
 lished and actually taking place. And since the certain 
 natural course of things is the conduct of providence, 
 or the government of God, though carried on by the in- 
 
 * See Dissertation II. 
 
Chap'. III.] Moral Government of God. ^ 91 
 
 strumentality of men, the observation here made amounts 
 to this, that mankind find themselves placed by him in 
 such circumstances as that they are unavoidably ac- 
 countable for their behavior, and are often punished, 
 and sometimes rewarded, under his government, in the 
 view of their being mischievous or eminently beneficial 
 to society. 
 
 If it be objected that good actions, and such as are 
 beneficial to society, are often punished, as in the case 
 of persecution and in other cases, and that objection rei- 
 ill and mischievous actions are often re- fshmentofgowi 
 warded, it may be answered distinctly, first, actions, etc. 
 that this is in no sort necessary, and consequently not 
 natural in the sense in which it is necessary, and there- 
 fore natural, that ill or mischievous actions should be 
 punished; and in the next place, that good actions are 
 never punished, considered as beneficial to society, nor 
 ill actions rewarded, under the view of their being hurt- 
 ful to it.* So that it stands good, without any thing on 
 the side of vice to be set over against it, that the Author 
 of nature has as truly directed that vicious actions, con- 
 sidered as mischievous to society, should be punished, 
 and put mankind under a necessity of thus punishing 
 them, as he has directed and necessitated us to preserve 
 our lives by food. 
 
 8. IV. In the natural course of things, virtue, as suchy 
 
 * [These vicious actions are never rewarded because they are vicious. 
 but though they are vicious ; and virtuous actions are sometimes pun^ 
 ished, yet never as virtuous, or never because virtuous, but though 
 virtuous, — Chalmers.] 
 
 [Dr. Mandeville, in his " Fable of the Bees," alleges that private 
 vices are often public benefits, and that luxury is necessary to the 
 well-being of society. Others have maintained the same opinion. 
 
 See this doctrine refuted in Browne on the Characteristics, Essay 
 ii. § 5 ; Warburton's Divine Legation, book i, § 6 ; Berkeley's Mi- 
 nute Philosopher, dialogue ii. See also Whately, and other writers, 
 on Tolitical Economy. — F.] 
 
92 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 is actually rewarded, and vice, as such, punished ; which 
 
 Natural vir- ^^^^^ ^^ afford an instance, or example, not 
 
 tue assuch re- only of government, but of moral govern- 
 
 warcled. Actions * o 7 o 
 
 uudquaiitiesdis- ment besfun and established: moral in the 
 
 unguislied. . 
 
 strictest sense, though not in that perfection 
 of degree which religion teaches us to expect. In order 
 to see this more clearly, we must distinguish between 
 actions themselves, and that quality ascribed to them, 
 which we call virtuous or vicious. The gratification it- 
 self of every natural passion must be attended with 
 delight ; and acquisitions of fortune, however made, are 
 acquisitions of the means or materials of enjoyment. 
 An action, then, by which any natural passion is grati- 
 fied or fortune acquired, procures delight or advantage, 
 abstracted from all consideration of the morality of such 
 action. Consequently, the pleasure or advantage in this 
 case is gained by the action itself, not by the morality, 
 the virtuousness or viciousness of it, though it be, per- 
 haps, virtuous or vicious. Thus to say such an action 
 or course of behavior procured such pleasure or advan- 
 tage, or brought on such inconvenience and pain, is 
 quite a different thing from saying that such good or 
 bad effect was owing to the virtue or vice of such action 
 or behavior. In one case, an action, abstracted from 
 all moral consideration, produced its effect ; in the oth- 
 er case — for it will appear that there are such cases — the 
 morality of the action, the action under a moral consider- 
 ation, that is, the virtuousness or viciousness of it, pro- 
 duced the effect. Now I say virtue, as such, naturally 
 procures considerable advantages to the virtuous; and 
 vice, as such, naturally occasions great inconvenience, 
 and even misery, to the vicious, in very many instances. 
 The immediate The immediate effects of virtue and vice 
 
 offects of virtue _i.u "jji xu 
 
 aiid vice iiius- ^pon the mind and temper are to be men- 
 trate this. tioned as instances of it. Vice, as such, is 
 
 naturally attended with some sort of i.neasiness, and not 
 
Chap. III.] Moral Government of God. 93 
 
 uncommonly with great disturbance and apprehension. 
 That inward feeling, which, respecting lesser matters 
 and in familiar speech, we call being vexed with one's 
 self, and in matters of importance and in more serioub 
 language, remorse, is an uneasiness naturally arising 
 from an action of a man's own, reflected upon by him- 
 self as wrong, unreasonable, faulty, that is, vicious, in 
 greater or less degrees; and this manifestly is a different 
 feeling from that uneasiness which arises from a sense 
 of mere loss or harm. What is more common than to 
 hear a man lamenting an accident or event, and adding 
 — but, however, he has the satisfaction that he cannot 
 blame himself for it ; or on the contrary, that he has the 
 uneasiness of being sensible it was his own doing.'* Thus, 
 also, the disturbance and fear which often follow upon a 
 man's having done an injury, arise from a sense of his 
 being blameworthy; otherwise there would, in many 
 cases, be no ground of disturbance, nor any reason to 
 fear resentment or shame. On the other hand, inward 
 security and peace, and a mind open to the several grat- 
 ifications of life, are the natural attendants of innocence 
 and virtue ; to which must be added, the complacency, 
 satisfaction, and even joy of heart, which accompany 
 the exercise, the real exercise, of gratitude, friendship, 
 benevolence. 
 
 And here, I think, ought to be mentioned the fears 
 of future punishment, and peaceful hopes of Aisohoi-esumi 
 
 \ . ^ , ^ fears for th(t fu- 
 
 a better life m those who fully believe or tme. 
 
 have any serious apprehension of religion;* because 
 
 * [When one supposes he is about to die there comes over him a 
 fear and anxi ?ty about things in regard to which he felt none before 
 for the stories -rVich are told about Hades, that such as have prac- 
 ficed wrong m,.iS' there suffer punishment, although made light of for 
 awhile, then torment the soul lest they should be true. But he who 
 is conscioii"- of innocence has a pleasant and good hope w liich u ill 
 support < 1<1 :ige. — Plato, Repub., i, Ji 5. — Mai. com.] 
 
94 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 these hopes and fears are present uneasiness and satis- 
 faction to the mind, and cannot be got rid of by great 
 part of the world, even by men who have thought most 
 thoroughly upon that subject of religion. And no one 
 can say how considerable this uneasiness and satisfaction 
 may be, or what, upon the whole, it may amount to. 
 
 In the next place, comes in the consideration that uYi 
 
 honest and good men are disposed to befriend honest 
 
 Also tiie dis- and Sfood men, as such, and to discounte- 
 
 position jf good . . 
 
 men toward the nance the vicious, as such, and do so in 
 
 virtuous and the 
 
 vicious. some degree — indeed, in a considerable de- 
 
 gree ; from which favor and discouragement cannot but 
 arise considerable advantage and inconvenience. And 
 though the generality of the world have little regard to 
 the morality of their own actions, and may be supposed 
 to have less to that of others, when they themselves are 
 not concerned, yet, let any one be known to be a man 
 of virtue, somehow or other he will be favored, and good 
 offices will be done him from regard to his character, 
 without remote views, occasionally, and in some low 
 degree, I think, by the generality of the world, as it hap- 
 pens to come in their way. Public honors, too, and ad- 
 vantages, are the natural consequences, are sometimes, 
 at least, the consequences, in fact, of virtuous actions, 
 of eminent justice, fidelity, charity, love to our country, 
 considered in the view of being virtuous. And some- 
 times even death itself, often infamy and external incon- 
 veniences, are the public consequences of vice as vice. 
 For instance, the sense which mankind have of tyranny, 
 Injustice, oppression, additional to the mere feeling oi 
 fear of misery, has doubtless been instrumental in bring- 
 ing about revolutions which make a figure even in the 
 history of the world. For it is plain, men resent inju- 
 ries as implying faultiness, and retaliate, not merely un- 
 der the notion of having received harm, but of having 
 received wrong; and tlicy have this resentment in be- 
 
Chap. III.] Moral Government of God. 95 
 
 half of others, as well as of themselves. So, likewise, 
 even the generality are, in some degree, grateful, and 
 disposed to return good offices, not merel}^ because such 
 a one has been the occasion of good to them, but under 
 the view that such good offices implied kind intention and 
 good desert in the doer. To all this may be added two 
 or three particular things, which many per- The rule Df do- 
 sons will think frivolous; but to me noth- ™o?emment'''e^? 
 ing appears so which at all comes in toward ^'^^^^^'i- 
 determining a question of such importance, as whether 
 there be or be not a moral institution of government, 
 in the strictest sense moral, visibly established and be- 
 gun in nature. The particular things are these : that 
 in domestic government, which is doubtless natural, 
 children and others also are very generally punished for 
 falsehood, and injustice, and ill behavior, as such, and re- 
 warded for the contrary; which are instances where ve- 
 racity, and justice, and right behavior, as such, are natu- 
 rally enforced by rewards and punishments, whether more 
 or less considerable in degree : that though civil govern- 
 ment be supposed to take cognizance of actions in no 
 other view than as prejudicial to society, without re- 
 spect to the immorality of them, yet as such actions are 
 immoral, so the sense which men have of the immorality 
 of them very greatly contributes, in different ways, to 
 bring offenders to justice ; and that entire absence of all 
 crime and guilt, in the moral sense, when plainly ap- 
 pearing, will almost of course procure, and circum- 
 stances of aggravated guilt prevent, a remission of the 
 penalties annexed to civil crimes, in many cases, though. 
 by no means in all.- 
 
 9. Upon the whole, then, besides the good tuJ^wiTtm-ns 
 and bad effects of virtue and vice upon men's ?." the approba- 
 
 ' nou of virtutj, 
 
 own minds, the course of the world does, in ^^^ 
 some measure, turn upon the approbation and disappro- 
 bation of them, as such, in others. 'I'he sense of well 
 
96 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 and ill doing, the presages of conscience, the love of 
 good characters and dislike of bad ones, honor, sname, 
 resentment, gratitude ; all these, considered in them- 
 selves and in their effects, do afford manifest real in- 
 stances of virtue, as such, naturally favored, and of vice, 
 as such, discountenanced, more or less, in the daily 
 course of human life ; in every age, in every relation, in 
 every general circumstance of it. That God has given 
 us a moral nature,* may most justly be urged as a proof 
 of our being under his moral government ; but that he 
 has placed us in a condition which gives this nature, as 
 one may speak, scope to operate, and in which it does un- 
 avoidably operate, that is, influence mankind to act, so 
 as thus to favor and reward virtue, and discountenance 
 and punish vice ; this is not the same, but a further ad- 
 ditional proof of his moral government ; for it is an in- 
 stance of it. The first is a proof that he will finally 
 favor and support virtue effectually ; the second is an 
 example of his favoring and supporting it at present, in 
 some degree. 
 
 10. If a more distinct inquiry be made, whence it 
 
 arises that virtue, as such, is often rewarded, and vice, 
 
 • , , , as such, is punished, and this rule never in- 
 
 Why virtue Is . '. 
 
 rewarded and verted, it will be found to proceed, m part, 
 
 vice punished. . ,.,_ , •,,- 
 
 immediately from the moral nature itself 
 which God has given us ; and also, in part, from his 
 having given us, together with this nature, so great a 
 power over each other's happiness and misery. For, 
 .first^ it is certain that peace and delight, in some degree 
 and upon some occasions, is the necessary and present 
 effect of virtuous i)ractice ; an effect arising immediately 
 from that constitution of our nature. We are so made 
 that well-doing, as such, gives us satisfaction, at least, 
 in some instances; ill-doing, as such, in none. And, 
 secondly^ from our moral nature, joined with God's hav- 
 
 * See Dissertation IL 
 
Chap. III.] Moral Government of God. 97 
 
 ing put our happiness and misery in many respects in 
 each other's power, it cannot but be that vice, as such, 
 3ome kinds and instances of it at least, will be infamous, 
 and men will be disposed to punish it as in itself de- 
 testable ; and the villain will by no means be able al- 
 ways to uvoid feeling that infamy, any more than he \\ A 
 be able to escape this further punishment which man- 
 kind will be disposed to inflict upon him, under the no- 
 tion of his deserving it. But there can be nothing on 
 the side of vice to answer this, because there is nothing 
 in the human mind contradictory, as the ^, ^^. . 
 
 . •' ^ othing in tne 
 
 lo2:icians speak, to virtue. For virtue con- mind contradio- 
 
 ° , '■ ... torj- to viitue. 
 
 sists m a regard to what is right and reason- 
 able, as being so ; in a regard to veracity, justice, charity, 
 in themselves: and there is surely no such thing as a 
 like natural regard to falsehood, injustice, cruelty. If it 
 be thought that there are instances of an approbation of 
 vice, as such, in itself, and for its own sake, (though it 
 does not appear to me that there is any such thing at 
 all,) but supposing there be, it is evidently monstrous; 
 as much so as the most acknowledged perversion of any 
 passion whatever. Such instances of perversidn, then, 
 being left out as merely imaginary, or, however, unnat- 
 ural ; it must follow, from the frame of our nature, and 
 from our condition in the respects now described, that 
 vice cannot at all be, and virtue cannot but be, favored, 
 as such, by others, upon some occasions, and happy in 
 itself, in some degree. For what is here insisted upon 
 is, not the degree in which virtue and vice are thus dis- 
 tinguished, but only the thing itself, that they are so in 
 some degree ; though the whole good and bad effect of 
 virtue and vice, as such, is not inconsiderable in degree. 
 But that they must be thus distinguished, in some de- 
 gree, is in a manner necessary; it is matter of fact of 
 daily experience, even in the greatest confusion of 
 human affairs. 
 7 
 
 ^> 
 
()S Analogy of Religion. [Part I, 
 
 11. It is not pretended but thai, in the natural course 
 of things, happiness and misery appear to be distributed 
 
 T. . t>y other rules than only the personal merit 
 
 How happi- ■' ^ ■' ^ 
 
 ness and misery and demerit of characters. They may some- 
 are distributed. . ,. . ... 
 tunes be distributed b} way of mere disci- 
 pline. There may be the wisest and best reasons why 
 the world should be governed by general laws, from 
 whence such promiscuous distribution, perhaps, must 
 follow ; and also why our happiness and misery should 
 be put in each other's power, in the degree which they 
 are. And these things, as in general they contribute to 
 the rewarding virtue and punishing vice, as such ; so 
 they often contribute also, not to the inversion of this, 
 which is impossible, but to the rendering persons pros- 
 perous though wicked, afflicted though righteous; and, 
 which is worse, to the rewardifig some actions^ though 
 vicious, and ptinishing other actions, though virtuous. 
 But all this cannot drown the voice of nature in the 
 Naturally dis- conduct of Provideuce, plainly declaring it- 
 tributed. ^^i^ ^^^ virtue, by way of distinction from 
 vice, and preference to it. For, our being so constituted 
 as that virtue and vice are thus naturally favored and dis- 
 countenanced, rewarded and punished respectively as 
 such, is an intuitive proof of the intent of nature that 
 it should be so; otherwise the constitution of our mind, 
 from which it thus immediately and directly proceeds, 
 would be absurd. But it cannot be said, because vir- 
 tuous actions are sometimes punished and vicious ac 
 tions rewarded, that nature intended it. For, though 
 this great disorder is brought about, as all actions are 
 done, by means of some natural passion, yet this may be, 
 as it undoubtedly is, brought about by the perversion of 
 such passion, implanted in us foi other, and those very 
 good, purposes. And indeed these other and good pur- 
 poses, even of every passion, may be clearly seen. 
 
 12. We have then a declaration, in some degree of 
 
Chap. 111.! Moral Government of God. 99 
 
 present effect, from Him who is supreme in nature, which 
 side ne is of, or what part he takes; a God declares 
 declaration for virtue and against vice. So ^'^ ^'"■*"®- 
 far, therefore, as a man is true to virtue, to veracity and 
 jiislice, to equity and charity, and the right of the case, 
 in whatever he is concerned, so far he is on the side of 
 the divine administration, and co-operates with it; and 
 from hence, to such a man, arises naturally a secret sat- 
 isfaction and sense of security, and implicit hope of 
 somewhat further. And, 
 
 13. V. This hope is confirmed by the necessary ten- 
 dencies of virtue, which, though not of present effect, 
 yet are at present discernible in nature, and This hope con- 
 so afford an instance of somewhat moral in sarv^VndencS 
 the essential constitution of it. There is, of virtue, 
 in the nature of things, a tendency in virtue and vice to 
 produce the good and bad effects now mentioned, in a 
 greater degree than they do in fact produce them. For 
 instance, good and bad men would be much more re- 
 warded and punished as such, were it not that justice is 
 often artificially eluded, that characters are not known, 
 and many who would thus favor virtue and discourage 
 vice, are hindered from doing so by accidental causes. 
 These tendencies of virtue and vice are obvious with. 
 regard to individuals. But it may require more particu- 
 larly to be considered, that power in a society^ by being 
 under the direction of virtue, naturally increases, and 
 has a necessary tendency to prevail over opposite power 
 not under the direction of it ; in like manner as power, 
 by being under the direction of reason, increases, and 
 has a tendency to prevail over brute force. There are 
 sev:iral brute creatures of equal, and several of superior, 
 strength to that of men; and possibly the sum of the 
 whole strength of brutes may be greater than that of 
 mankind : but reason gives us the advantage and supe- 
 riority over them, and thus man is the acknowledged 
 
loo Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 governing animal upon the earth. Nor is this superior- 
 ity considered by any as accidental ; but as what reason 
 has a tendency, in the nature of the thing, to obtain. 
 And yet, perhaps, difficulties may be raised about the 
 meaning, as well as the truth, of the assertion, that virtue 
 has tliC like tendency. 
 
 14. To obviate these difficulties, let us see more dis- 
 tinctly how the case stands with regard to reason, which 
 is so readily acknowledged to have this ad- 
 
 Tendencyofrpa- ,^ , 
 
 Bon to triumph vantageous tendency. Suppose, then, two 
 
 over brute force. , ,- , , i , • j 
 
 or three men of the best and most improved 
 understanding, in a desolate open plain, attacked by ten 
 times the number of beasts of prey ; would their reason 
 secure them the victory in this unequal combat ? Power, 
 then, though joined with reason, and under its direction, 
 cannot be expected to prevail over opposite power, 
 though merely brutal, unless the one bears some pro- 
 portion to the other. Again, put the imaginary case, 
 that rational and irrational creatures were of a like ex- 
 ternal shape and manner; it is certain, before there 
 were opportunities for the first to distinguish each other, 
 to separate from their adversaries and to form a union 
 among themselves, they might be upon a level, or in 
 several respects, upon great disadvantage, though united 
 they might be vastly superior; since union is of such 
 efficacy that ten men, united, might be able to accom- 
 plish what ten thousand of the same natural strength 
 and understanding, wholly ununited, could not. In this 
 case, then, brute force might more than maintain its 
 ground against reason, for want of union among the 
 rational creatures. Or suppose a number of men to land 
 upon an island inhabited only by wild beasts ; a number 
 of men, who, by the regulations of civil government, the 
 inventions of art, and the experience of some years, 
 could they be preserved so long, would be really suffi- 
 cient to subdue the wild beasts, and to preserve them 
 
CiiAr. JIIJ Moral Government OF God. loi 
 
 selves in security from them ; yet a conjuncture of acci- 
 dents might give such advantage to the irrational animals 
 as that they might at once overpower, and even extirpate, 
 the whole species of rational ones. Length of time, 
 then, proper scope and opportunities for reason to exert 
 itself, may be absolutely necessary to its prevailing o\er 
 brute force. 
 
 Further still : there are many instances of brutes suc- 
 ceeding in attempts which they could not have under- 
 taken had not their irrational nature ren- „ , _ 
 
 Supposea tn- 
 
 dered them incapable of foreseeing the dan- nmph of brutes. 
 
 ^ ° . Inverted order. 
 
 ger of such attempts, or the fury of passion 
 hindered their attending to it ; and there are instances 
 of reason and real prudence preventing men's undertak- 
 ing what, it hath appeared afterward, they might have 
 succeeded in by a lucky rashness. And in certain con- 
 junctures, ignorance and folly, weakness and discord, 
 rnay have their advantages. So that rational animals 
 have not necessarily the superiority over irrational ones ; 
 but how improbable soever it may be, it is evidently pos- 
 sible that in some globes the latter may be superior. 
 And were the former wholly at variance and disunited, 
 by false self-interest and envy, by treachery and injustice, 
 and consequent rage and malice against each other, 
 while the latter were firmly united among themselves by 
 instinct, this might greatly contribute to the introducing 
 such an inverted order of things. For every one would 
 consider it as inverted ; since reason has, in the nature 
 of it, a tendency to prevail over brute force, notwith- 
 standing the possibility it may not prevail, and the ne- 
 cessity which there is of many concurrent circumstances 
 to render it prevalent. 
 
 Now I say, virtue in a society has a like virtiiTu)"*i%o? 
 tendency to procure superiority and addi- """^y^ ^^• 
 tional power, whether this power be considered as the 
 means pf security from opposite power, ur of obtaining 
 
102 Analogy of Religion. ['Par r I, 
 
 other advantages. And it has this tendency, by render- 
 ing public good an object and end to every member of the 
 society: by putting every one upon consideration and 
 diligence, recollection and self-government, both in or- 
 der to see what is the most effectual method, and also 
 ♦n order to perform their proper part, for obtaining and 
 preserving it ; by uniting a society within Itself, and so 
 increasing its strength, and, which is particularly to be 
 mentioned, uniting it by means of veracity and justice. 
 For as these last are principal bonds of union, so benev- 
 olence, or public spirit, undirected, unrestrained by 
 them, is — nobody knows what. 
 
 15. And suppose the invisible world, and the invisible 
 
 dispensations of Providence, to be in any sort analogous 
 
 to what appears ; or that both tosrether make 
 
 Same tenden- . 
 
 cy throughout up One uniform scheme, the two parts of 
 
 the universe. , • , , , • , , , , . , 
 
 Avhich, the part which we see, and that which 
 is beyond our observation, are analogous to each other; 
 then there must be a like natural tendency in the de- 
 rived power, throughout the universe, under the direc- 
 tion of virtue, to prevail in general over that which is 
 not under its direction ; as there is in reason, derived 
 reason in the universe, to prevail over brute force. But 
 then, in order to the prevalence of virtue, or that it may 
 actually produce what it has a tendency to produce, the 
 like concurrences are necessary as are to the prevalence 
 of reason. There must be some proportion between 
 the natural power or force which is, and that which is 
 not, under the direction of virtue : there must be suffi- 
 cient length of time ; for the complete success of vir'. je, 
 s^" of reason, cannot, from the nature of the thing, be 
 otlierwife than gradual : there must be, as one may 
 speak, a fair field of trial, a stage large and extensive 
 enough, proper occasions and opportunities for the vir- 
 tuous to join together, ta exert themselves against law- 
 less force, and to reap the fruit of their- united labors. 
 
Chap. III.] Moral Government of God. 103 
 
 Now indeed it is to be hoped that the disproportion be- 
 tween the good and the bad, even here on earth, is not 
 so great, but that the former have natural „. , 
 
 , . . . Hinderancos 
 
 power sufficient to their prevailinsj to a con- mayberemoved 
 
 . ... , in a future state, 
 
 siderable degree, if circumstances would 
 permit this power to be united. For much less, very 
 much less, power, under the direction of virtue, would 
 prevail over much greater, not under the direction of it.* 
 However, good men over the face of the earth cannot 
 unite ; as for other reasons, so because they cannot be 
 sufficiently ascertained of each other's characters. And 
 the known course of human things, the scene we are 
 now passing through, particularly the shortness of life, 
 denies to virtue its full scope in several other respects. 
 The natural tendency which we have been considering, 
 though real, is hindei-ed from being carried into effect in 
 the present state, but these hinderances maybe removed 
 in a future one. Virtue, to borrow the Christian allu- 
 
 * With reference to this point Fitzgerald quotes a forcible passage 
 from Coleridge : " Often have I reflected with awe on the great and 
 disproportionate power which an individual of no extraordinary tal- 
 ents or attainments may exert by mej-ely throzviiig off all restraint of 
 conscience. ... It is not vice, as vice, which is thus mighty, but sys- 
 tematic vice. The abandonment of all principle of right enables the 
 soul to choose and act upon a principle of wrong, and to subordinate 
 to this one principle all the various vices of human nature. For it 
 is a mournful truth, that as devastation is incomparably an easier 
 work than production, so may all its means and instruments be more 
 easily arranged into a scheme and system." (Friend, i, 158, 150 ; 
 Pickering, 1837.} 
 
 As soon as it is understood that bad men make no profession of vir- 
 tue, and have thrown off all the restraints of conscience, their power 
 drchnes. 
 
 There is an intensity and continuity of efibrt in great wickedness, 
 rarely manifested by most men who are esteemed as good, in the 
 usual sense of the word. Moreover, the results of wickedness are 
 more striking and directly manifest to the senses than the influence 
 of virtue, which is often more quiet and unobserved, tliough more 
 abiding »nd really more powerful. 
 
I04 Analogy, of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 sion, is militant here, and various untoward accidents 
 contribute to its being often overborne ; but it may com- 
 bat with greater advantage hereafter, and prevail com- 
 pletely, and enjoy its consequent rewards in some future 
 states.* Neglected as it is, perhaps unknown, perhaps 
 despised and oppressed here, there may be scenes in 
 eternity lasting enough, and in every other way adapted 
 to afford it a sufficient sphere of action, and a sufficient 
 sphere for the natural consequences of it to follow m 
 fact. If the soul be naturally immortal, and this state 
 be a progress -toward a future one, as childhood is toward 
 mature age, good men may naturally unite, not only 
 among themselves, but also with other orders of virtuous 
 creatures in that future state. For virtue, from the very 
 nature of it, is a principle and bond of union, in some 
 degree, among all who are endued with it and known to 
 each other; so as that by it a good man cannot but 
 recommend himself to the favor and protection of all 
 virtuous beings throughout the whole universe, who can 
 be acquainted with his character, and can any way 
 interpose in his behalf in any part of his duration. 
 
 And one might add, that suppose all this advanta- 
 geous tendency of virtue to become effect among one or 
 more orders of creatures, in any distant scenes and peri- 
 ods, and to be seen by any orders of vicious creatures, 
 throughout the universal kingdom of God ; this happy 
 effect of virtue would have a tendency, by way of exam- 
 ple, and possibly in other ways, to amend those of them 
 who are capable of amendment, and being recovered to 
 a just sense of virtue. If our notions of the plan of 
 
 * [This is an instance of Butler's care to avoid assuming more than 
 his premises will warrant. He is arguing here on the foot of reason 
 alone; and, as he had before observed that mere reason couLi not 
 show that probation would terminate with this life, so he speaks here 
 of the supposition (consistent with such a state of knowledge) of ha 
 i^a^^sing through some state or states of/wiA^^i^O' hereafter. — F.l^ 
 
Chap. JII.l Moral Government of God. 105 
 
 Providence were enlarged, in any sort proportionable to 
 5\'hat late discoveries have enlarged our views with re- 
 spect to the material world, representations of this kind 
 would ! ot appear absurd or extravagant. However, 
 they are not to be taken as intended for a literal delin- 
 eation of what is in fact the particular ^ 
 
 '■ These are sup- 
 
 srheme of the universe, which cannot be positions- waiit 
 
 , . ^ . . they show. 
 
 known without revelation ; for suppositions 
 are not to be looked on as true because not incredible, 
 but they are mentioned to show that our finding virtue 
 to be hindered from procuring to itself such superiority 
 and advantages is no objection against its having, in 
 the essential nature of the thing, a tendency to procure 
 them. And the suppositions now mentioned do plainly 
 show this ; for they show that these hinderances are so 
 far from being necessary, that we ourselves can easily 
 conceive how they may be removed in future states, and 
 full scope be granted to virtue. And all these advan- 
 tageous tendencies of it are to be considered as decla- 
 rations of God in its favor. This, however, is taking a 
 pretty large compass ; though it is certain that as the 
 material world appears to be, in a manner, boundless 
 and immense, there must be some scheme of Providence 
 vast in proportion to it. 
 
 16. But let us return to the earth, our habitation, and 
 we shall see this happy tendency of virtue by imagining 
 an instance not so vast and remote ; by 
 
 -^ The trimnph 
 
 3'ipposing a kingdom or society of men upon of virtue in a 
 it, perfectly virtuous, tor a succession of 
 many ages; to which, if you please, may be given a sit- 
 uation advantageous for universal monarchy. In such 
 a state there would be no such thing as faction, but men 
 of the greatest capacity would, of course, all along, have 
 the chief direction of affairs willingly yielded to them, 
 and they would share it among themselves without envy. 
 Each of these would have the part assigned him to 
 
 1»J. 
 
io6 Analogy of Religion. ITAKr I 
 
 which his genius was peculiarly adapted ; and others, 
 who had not any distinguished genius, would be safe, 
 and think themselves very happy, by being under the 
 protection and guidance of those who had. Public de- 
 teiniinations would really be the result of the united 
 wisdom of the community, and they would faithfully be 
 executed by the united strength of it. Some would 
 in a higher way contribute, but all would in some 
 way contribute to the public prosperity, and in it 
 each would enjoy the fruits of his own virtue. And 
 as injustice, whether by fraud or force, would be un- 
 krown among themselves, so they would be sufficiently 
 secured from it in their neighbors. For cunning and 
 false self-interest, confederacies in injustice, ever slight, 
 and accompanied with faction and intestine treachery ; 
 these, on one hand, would be found mere childish folly 
 and weakness when set in opposition against wisdom, 
 public spirit, union inviolable, and fidelity on the other, 
 allowing both a sufficient length of years to try their 
 force. Add the general influence which such a king- 
 dom would have over the face of the earth, by way of 
 example particularly, and the reverence which would be 
 paid it. It would plainly be superior to all others, and 
 the world must gradually come under its empire; not 
 by means of lawless violence, but partly by what must 
 be allowed to be just conquest, and partly by other 
 kingdoms submitting themselves voluntarily to it thiough- 
 out a course of ages, and claiming its protection, one 
 after another, in successive exigencies. The head of it 
 would be a universal monarch, in another sense than 
 any mortal has yet been, and the eastern style would be 
 literally applicable to him, that all people^ nations, and 
 la7if^uao;es should serve him. And though, in- 
 
 No such state, * <?> o ' 
 
 yet a tendency deed, our knowledge of human nature, and 
 the whole history of mankind, show the im- 
 possibility, without some miraculous interposition, that 
 
Chap. III.] Moral Governmeni of God. 107 
 
 a 11 amber of men here on earth should unite in one so- 
 ciety or government, in the fear of God and universal 
 practice of virtue, and that such a government should con- 
 rinue so united for a succession of ages; yet, admitting 
 or supposing this, the effect would be as now drawn out. 
 Ar.i thus, for instance, the wonderful power and pros- 
 perity promised to the Jewish nation in the Scripture 
 would be, in a great measure, the consequence of what 
 is predicted of them ; that the " people should be all 
 righteous, and inherit the land forever;" were we to un- 
 derstand the latter phrase of a long continuance only, 
 sufficient to give things time to work. The predictions 
 of this kind, for there are many of tliem, cannot come to 
 pass in the present known course of nature ; but suppose 
 them to come to pass, and then the dominion and pre- 
 eminence promised must naturally follow, to a very 
 considerable degree. 
 
 17. Consider now the general system of religion ; that 
 the government of the world is uniform, and one, and 
 moral ; that virtue and right shall finally Tendency of 
 have the advantage, and prevail over fraud S["mo?a?gov- 
 and lawless force — over the deceits as well ^rnment. 
 
 as the violence of wickedness — under the conduct 
 of one supreme governor ; and from the observations 
 above made it will appear that God has, by our rea- 
 son, given us to see a peculiar connection in the sev- 
 eral parts of this scheme, and a tendency toward the 
 completion of it, arising out of the very nature of virtue; 
 which tendency is to be considered as somewhat moral 
 in the essential constitution of things. If any one should 
 think all this to be of little importance, I desire him to 
 consider what he would think if vice had, essentially 
 and in its nature, these advantageous tendencies, or if 
 virtue had essentially the direct contrary ones. 
 
 18. But it may be objected, that notwithstanding all 
 these natural effects, and these natural tendencies of 
 
io8 Analogy of Religion. LPakt I. 
 
 virtue, yet things may be now going on throughout the 
 
 universe, and may go on hereafter* in the same mixed 
 
 _ way as here at present upon earth ; virtue 
 
 thinirsnow and sometimes prosperous, sometimes depressed I 
 
 hereafter may go . . . 
 
 on in the same vice sometHiies punished, sometmies sue- 
 
 mixed way. r i * -i^ i i • i - i • • 
 
 cessiul. 1 lie answer to which is, that it is 
 not the purpose of this chapter, nor of this treatise, 
 properly to prove God's perfect moral government over 
 the world, or the truth of religion, but to observe what 
 there is in the constitution and course of nature to con- 
 firm the proper proof of it, supposed to be known, and 
 that the weight of the foregoing observations to this 
 purpose may be thus distinctly proved. Pleasure and 
 pain are, indeed, to a certain degree, say to a very high 
 degree, distributed among us without any apparent re- 
 gard to the merit or demerit of characters. And were 
 there nothing else, concerning this matter, discernible 
 in the constitution and course of nature, there would be 
 no ground, from the constitution and course of nature, 
 to hope or to fear that men would be rewarded or pun- 
 ished hereafter according to their deserts ; which, how- 
 ever, it is to be remarked, implies that even then there 
 would be no ground, from appearances, to think that 
 vice, upon the whole, would have the advantage, rather 
 than that virtue would. And thus the proof of a future 
 state of retribution would rest upon the usual known ar- 
 guments for it ; which are, I think, plainly unanswerable, 
 and would be so though there were no additioral con- 
 firmation of them from the thinsrs above insisted on. But 
 
 &' 
 
 these things are a very strong confirmation of them. For, 
 Godnotindif- lo. First, They show that the Author :>( 
 
 fsrent to virtue . . , . . . . 
 
 and vice. nature is not indiiferent to virtue and vice 
 
 They amount to a declaration from him, determinate, 
 
 * [The objection is taken from Hume. Compare D. Stewart/Acl- 
 ive Powers, vol. ii, pp. 226, etc Archbishop Whately's Essays on 
 Peculianties of Ghristian Religion,: note.. Essay I. § O.rr'Fj : 
 
Chap. III.] Moral Government of God. log 
 
 and not to be evaded, in favor of one and againsi the 
 other ; such a declaration as there is nothing to be set 
 over against, or answer, on the part of vice. So that 
 were a man, laying aside the proper proof of religion, to 
 determine, from the course of nature only, whether it were 
 most probable that the righteous or the wicked would 
 hive the advantage in a future life, there can be no 
 doubt but that he would determine the probability to be 
 that the former Would. The course of nature, then, in 
 the view of it now given, furnishes us with a real practi- 
 cal proof of the obligations of religion. 
 
 20. Secondly, When, conformably to what religion 
 teaches us, God shall reward and punish virtue and vice 
 as such, so as that every one shall, upon the Puturedistrib 
 whole, have his . deserts, this distributive LmeinkSd,dif- 
 juslice will not be a thing different in kind, fe'^ti^deg^ 
 but only in degree^ from what we experience in his present 
 government. It will be that in effect^ toward which we 
 now see a tendency. It will be no more than the comple- 
 tion of that moral government, \h.Q principles and begin" 
 ning of which have been shown, beyond all dispute, dis- 
 cernible in the present constitution and course of nature. 
 And from hence it follows, 
 
 21. Thirdly, That as under the natural government 
 of God our experience of those kinds and degrees of 
 happiness and misery which we do experi- Expectation ?. 
 ence at present, gives just ground to hope S^of ^pSsi- 
 for and to fear liigher degrees and other ™^"*^- 
 kinds of both in a future state, supposing a future state 
 admitted ; so, under his moral government, our experi- 
 f nee that virtue and vice are, in the manners above- 
 mentioned, actually rewarded and punished at present, 
 in a certain degree, gives just ground to hope and to 
 fear that ihty may be rewarded and punished in a higher 
 degree hereafter. It is acknowledged, indeed, that this 
 xlone is not sufficient ground to think that they actually 
 
iro Analogy of Religion. [Part 1 
 
 will be rewarded and punished in a higher degree, rathei 
 than in a lower: but then, 
 
 22. Lastly, There is sufficient ground to think so, from 
 the good and bad tendencies of virtue and vice. For 
 
 these tendencies are essential, and founded 
 
 This expectation 
 
 —how strength- in the nature of thins^s : whereas, the hm- 
 
 eiied. , . 
 
 derances to their beccming effect are, m 
 numberless cases, not necessary, but artificial only. 
 Now it may be much more strongly argued that these 
 tendencies, as well as the actual rewards and punish- 
 ments of virtue and vice which arise directly out of the 
 nature of things, will remain hereafter, than that the ac- 
 cidental hinderances of them will. And if these hinder- 
 ances do not remain, those rewards and punishments 
 cannot but be carried on much further toward the per- 
 fection of moral government, that is, the tendencies of 
 virtue and vice will become effect ; but when, or where, 
 or in what particular way, cannot be known at all but 
 by revelation. 
 
 23. Upon the whole, there is a kind of moral govern- 
 ment implied in God's natural government, (page 89;) 
 
 Recapitulation, virtue and vice are naturally rewarded and 
 punished as beneficial and mischievous to society, 
 (page 90,) and rewarded and punished directly as vir- 
 tue and vice, (page 91, etc.) The notion, then, of a 
 moral scheme of government is not fictitious, but natu- 
 ral ; for it is suggested to our thoughts by the constitu- 
 tion and course of nature ; and the execution of this 
 scheme is actually begun in the instances here men- 
 tioned. And these things are to be considered as a 
 declaration of the Author of natare for virtue, and 
 against vice; they give a credibility to the supposition 
 of their being rewarded and punished hereafter, and 
 also ground to hope and to fear that they may be re- 
 warded and punished in higher degrees than they are 
 here. And as all this is confirmed, soothe nr,:;uir tnt fc r 
 
Chap. III.] Moral Government of God. i i i 
 
 religion, from the constitution and course of nature, is 
 carried on further by observing .that there are natural 
 tendencies, and in innumerable cases only artificial hin- 
 derances, to this moral scheme being carried on much 
 further toward perfection than it is at present, (page 
 99, etc.) The notion, then, of a moral scheme of gov- 
 ernment much more perfect than what is seen, is not a 
 fictitious but a natural notion ; for it is suggested to our 
 thoughts by the essential tendencies of virtue and \ ice. 
 And these tendencies are to be considered as intima- 
 tions, as implicit promises and threatenings, from the 
 Author of nature, of much greater rewards and punish- 
 ments to follow virtue and vice than do at present. 
 And, indeed, every natural tendency, which is to con- 
 tinue, but which is hindered from becoming effect by 
 only accidental causes, affords a presumption that such 
 tendency will, some time or other, become effect : * a 
 presumption in degree proportionable to the length of 
 the duration through which such tendency will con- 
 tinue. And from these things together arises a real 
 presumption that the moral scheme of government es- 
 tablished in nature shall be carried on much further 
 
 * [The Archbishop of Dublin (Pol. Econ., lect. ix) has pointed out 
 the ambiguity of the word tendency^ which has been the occasion of 
 much confusion of thought. Tendency toward a result sometimes 
 (and strictly) only means the existence of a cause which, if operating 
 unimpeded, would produce the result. But commonly it is used to 
 imply the existence of such a state of things as makes it likely that 
 the result -Mill actually be produced, that is, in Butler's language, that 
 the hinderances to its operation are accidental ; such as do not act 
 steadily and uniformly against the cause, as such, but only occasion- 
 ally, and in consequence of its connection with other things with 
 which it may or may not be united. There is the clear presumption 
 in favor of continuance (noticed by Butler, part i, chap, i) for the 
 tendency which we see steadily and uniformly operating, while there 
 is nothing like the same presumption for the continu ince of tl:ose 
 causes of hirdTances which are not permanent in their action, nor 
 uniform in their nature. — F.J 
 
112 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 toward perfection hereafter, and, I think, a presumption 
 that it will be absolutely completed. But from these 
 things, joined with the moral nature which God has 
 given us, considered as given us by him, arises a prac- 
 tical proof * that it will be completed; a proof from 
 fact, and therefore a distinct one, from that which is 
 deduced from the eternal and unalterable relations — the 
 fitness and unfitness of actions. 
 
 * See this proof drawn out briefly, chap. vi. 
 
HAP. TV.] Of a State of Trial. 113 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 OF A STATE OF PROBATION, AS IMPLYING TRIAL, 
 DIFFICULTIES, AND DANGER.* 
 
 THE general doctrine of religion, that our present 
 life is a state of probation for a future one, com- 
 prehends under it several particular things Difference be- 
 distinct from each other. But the first and ^rmmitglv" 
 most common meaning of it seems to be, that ®''°°^^"'- 
 our future interest is now depending, and depending 
 upon ourselves ; that we have scope and o})portunities 
 
 * [It might be, and often is, indeed, made an objection to the re- 
 ligious system, that our way to the everlasting blessedness which it 
 proposes should be beset with so many lures which tempt us aside 
 from the prosecution of it ; and, on the other hand, that so many 
 hardships and difficulties should be attendant on our steadfast perse- 
 verance in that way. The thing complained of is, that our great and 
 ultimate good should have been made of such difficult attainment, 
 insomuch that the frail powers of humanity, either for the achieve- 
 ment of what is good or the resistance of what is evil, are so greatly 
 overtasked, as in the great majority of instances to be overborne. 
 Now in this chapter we are presented with a complete and conclusive 
 analogy, which, if it do not establish the reality of our religious trial, 
 at least serves to vindicate it against the exceptions which we have 
 just enumerated. Whatever doubt we may stand in regarding those 
 doctrines which respect the future and the unseen, there can be no 
 quarreling with present and actually observed facts. If the doctnr.e 
 be. that the way to our eternal good is a way of labor and self-denial, 
 it is in perfect analogy with the fact that this is the way to our tem • 
 poral good also. It is quite palpable that often many toils must be 
 undergone, and many temptations resisted, ere we can secure the most 
 highly-prized advantages of the life that now is ; and the conclusion 
 is, not that similar toils and temptations must, but that they may bc^ 
 the precursors and the preparatives of our happiness in another state 
 '>f being. — Chalmers.] 
 
t 14 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 here for that good and bad behavior which God will re- 
 ward and punish hereafter ; together with temptations 
 to one, as well as inducements of reason to the other. 
 And this is, in great measure, the same with saying that 
 » we are under the moral government of God, and to give 
 an account of our actions to him. For the notion of a 
 future account, and general righteous judgment, implies 
 some sort of temptations to what is wrong, otherwise 
 there would be no moral possibility of doing wrong, nor 
 ground for judgment or discrimination. But there is this 
 difference, that the -^oxdi probation is more distinctly and 
 particularly expressive of allurements to wrong, or dif- 
 ficulties in adhering uniformly to what is right, and of 
 the danger of miscarrying by such temptations, than the 
 words moral government. A state of probation, then, as 
 thus particularly implying in it trial, difficulties, and dan- 
 ger, may require to be considered distinctly by itself. 
 
 2. And as the moral government of God, which re- 
 ligion teaches us, implies that we are in a state of trial 
 This is a state with regard to a future world; so also his 
 ti^Jeind for^h^e natural government over us implies that we 
 
 l,resent world. ^^.^ j^^ ^ g^^^^ ^f ^^.-^j^ -^^ ^j^^ ^xV^ SCUSe, with 
 
 regard to the present world. Natural government, by 
 rewards and punishments, as much implies natural trial, 
 as moral government does moral trial. The natural 
 government of God here meant (chap, ii) consists in 
 his annexing pleasure to some actions and pain to oth- 
 ers, which are in our power to do or forbear, and in giv- 
 ing us notice of such appointment beforehand. This 
 necessarily implies that he has made our happiness and 
 miiiery, or our interest, to depend in part upon ourselves. 
 And so far as men have temptations to any course of 
 action which will probably occasion them greater tem- 
 poral inconvenience and uneasiness than satisfaction, so 
 far their temporal interest is in danger from themselves, 
 rr they are in a state of trial with respect to it. Now 
 
CiiAP. IV.] Of a State of Trial. 115 
 
 people often blame others, and even themselves, for 
 their misconduct in their temporal con- implied in om 
 cerns. And we find many are greatly want- ^^°*"'^^*- 
 ing to themselves, and miss of that natural happiness 
 which they might have obtained in the present life ; ■ 
 perhaps every one does in some degree. But many 
 run themselves into great inconvenience, and into ex- 
 treme distress and m.isery, not through incapacity of 
 knowing better, and doing better or themselves, which 
 would be nothing to the present purpose, but through 
 their own fault. And these things necessarily imply 
 temptation, and danger of miscarrying, in a greater or 
 less degree, with respect to our worldly interest or hap- 
 piness. Every one too, without having religion in his 
 thoughts, speaks of the hazards which young people run 
 upon their setting out in the world— hazards from other 
 causes than merely their ignorance and unavoidable ac- 
 cidents. And some courses of vice, at least, being con- 
 trary to men's worldly interest or good, temptations to 
 these must at the same time be temptations to forego 
 our present and our future interest. 
 
 Thus in our natural or temporal capacity we are in a 
 state of trial, that is, of difficulty and danger, analogous, 
 or like, to our moral and religious trial. This will more 
 distinctly appear to any one who thinks it worth while 
 more distinctly to consider what it is which constitutes 
 our trial in both capacities, and to observe how mankind 
 behave under it. 
 
 3. And that which constitutes this our trial, in both 
 these capacities, must be somewhat either in our ex- 
 ternal circumstances or in our nature. For, This trial oris- 
 on the one hand, persons may be betrayed Sees" w'^^ilil 
 into wrong behavior upon surprise, or over- ^^^' 
 come upon any other very singular and extraordinary ex- 
 ternal occasions, who would, otherwise, have preserved 
 their ( hnract-jr o - prudence and of virtue: in which 
 
I 1 6 ANALOGY OF RELIGION. [PART I. 
 
 cases, every one, in speaking of the wrong behavior of 
 these persons, would impute it to such particular ex- 
 ternal circumstances. And on the other hand, men who 
 have contracted habits of vice and folly of any kind, oi 
 have some particular passions in excess, will seek oppor- 
 tunities, and, as it were, go out of their way, to gratify 
 themselves in these respects, at the expense of their 
 wisdom and their virtue ; led to it, as every one would 
 say, not by external temptations, but by such habits and 
 passions. And the account of this last case is, that par- 
 t^icnlar passions are no more coincident with prudence, 
 or that reasonable self-love, the end of which is our 
 worldly interest, than they are with the principle of 
 virtue and religion, but often draw contrary ways to one 
 as well as to the other; and so such particular passions 
 are as much temptations to act imprudently with regard 
 to our worldly interest as to act viciously.* However, 
 as when we say, men are misled by external circum- 
 Both unite in Stances of temptation, it cannot but be un- 
 ^^ derstood that there is somewhat within them- 
 
 selves to render those circumstances temptations, or to 
 render them susceptible of impressions from them ; so, 
 when we say they are misled by passions, it is always 
 supposed that there are occasions, circumstances, and 
 objects, exciting these passions, and affording means for 
 gratifying them. And therefore temptations from with- 
 in and from without coincide, and mutually imply each 
 other. Now the several external objects of the appe- 
 tites, passions, and affections being present to the senses, 
 or offering themselves to the mind, and so exciting emo- 
 tions suitable to their nature, not only in cases where 
 they can be gratified consistently with innocence and 
 prudence, but also in cases where they cannot, and yet 
 can be gratified imprudently and viciously ; this as real- 
 
 * See Sermons preached at the Rolls, 1726, 2d ed., 205, etc, Pref, 
 i>. 25. etc Serm , p. 21. etc. 
 
CiiAF. IV.^ Of a State of Trial. 117 
 
 Iv put? them in danger of voluntarily foregoing their 
 present interest or good as their future, and as really 
 renders self-denial necessary to secure one as the other; 
 that is, we are in a like state of trial with respect to 
 both, by the very same passions excited by the very 
 same means. Thus mankind having a temporal inter- 
 est depending upon themselves, and a prudent course 
 of behavior being necessary to secure it, passions inor- 
 dinately excited, whether by means of example or by 
 any other external circumstance, toward such objects, 
 at such times, or in such degrees, as that they cannot be 
 gratified consistently with worldly prudence, are temp- 
 tations dangerous, and too often successful temptations, 
 to forego a greater temporal good for a less, that is, to 
 forego what is, upon the whole, our temporal interest, 
 for the sake of a present gratification. This is a de- 
 scription of our state of trial in our temporal capacity. 
 Substitute now the word future for temporal^ and virtue 
 iox prudence^ and it will be just as proper a description 
 of our state of trial in our religious capacity, so analo- 
 gous are they to each other.* 
 
 4. If, from consideration of this our like state of trial 
 in both capacities, we go on to observe further how man- 
 kind behave under it, we shall find there are „. ., 
 
 Sunilar reck- 
 
 some who have so little sense of it that they lessness with 
 
 . refereuco to the 
 
 scarce look beyond the passmg dav ; they present and fu- 
 
 , . , . ' . ture. 
 
 are so taken up with present gratifications 
 as to have, in a manner, no feeling of consequences, no 
 regard to their future ease or fortune in this life, any 
 more than to their happiness in another. Some appear 
 to be blinded and deceived by inordinate passion in 
 
 * [If because of these things we must give up the God of religion, 
 we should give up the God of nature also. If we persist in our ob- 
 jection notwillistanding these analogies, then should we conclude 
 either that we are under the regimen of an unrighteous deity, or that 
 there is no tieity at all. — CHALMERS.] 
 
n8 Analogy of Religion. [Part I 
 
 their worldly concerns as much as in religion. Others 
 are not deceived, but, as it were, forcibly carried away 
 by the like passions against their better judgment, and 
 feeble resolutions, too, of acting better. And there are 
 men. and truly they are not a few, who shameles'^iy 
 avow, not their interest, but their mere will and pleasure, 
 to be their law of life ; and who, in open defiance of 
 every thing that is reasonable, will go on in a course of 
 vicious extravagance, foreseeing, with no remorse and 
 little fear, that it will be their temporal ruin ; and some 
 of them, under the apprehension of the consequences of 
 wickedness in another state. And to speak in the most 
 moderate way, human creatures are not only continually 
 liable to go wrong voluntarily, but we see likewise that 
 they often actually do so, with respect to their temporal 
 interests as well as with respect to religion. 
 
 Thus our difficulties and dangers, or our trials in our 
 temporal and our religious capacity, as they proceed from 
 the same causes and have the same effect upon men's 
 behavior, are evidently analogous and of the same kind. 
 5.. It may be added, that as the difficulties and dan- 
 gers of miscarrying in our religious state of trial are 
 Similar diffi- greatly increased, and one is ready to think, 
 b^'^'^educationT ^" ^ manner wholly ^fiade by the ill behavior 
 ^^' of others; by a wrong education, wrong in 
 
 a moral sense, sometimes positively vicious; by general 
 bad example ; by the dishonest artifices which are got 
 into business of all kinds; and in very many parts of 
 the world, by religion's being corrupted into sunersti- 
 tions which indulge men in their vices ; so in like man- 
 ner, the difficulties of conducting ourselves prudently in 
 respect to our present interest, and our danger of being 
 led aside from pursuing it, are greatly increased by a 
 foolish education, and after we come to mature age, by 
 the extravagance and carelessness of others whom we 
 have mtercourse with, and by mistaken notions, very 
 
Chap. IV. J "Of a State of Trial. 119 
 
 generally prevalent and taken up from common opinion, 
 concerning temporal happiness and wherein it consists. 
 And persons, by their own negligence and folly in their 
 temporal affairs, no less than by a course of vice, bring 
 themselves into new difficulties, and by habits of indul- 
 gence become less qualified to go through them ; and 
 one irregularity after another embarrasses things to such 
 a degree that they know not whereabout they are, and 
 often makes the path of conduct so intricate and per- 
 plexed that it is difficult to trace it out; difficult even 
 to determine what is the prudent or the moral part. 
 Thus, for instance, wrong behavior in one stage of life, 
 youth; wrong, I mean, considering ourselves only in 
 our temporal capacity, without taking in religion ; this, 
 in several ways, increases the difficulties of right behav- 
 ior in mature age ; that is, puts us into a more disad- 
 vantageous state of trial in our temporal capacity. 
 
 6. We are an inferior part of the creation of God : 
 there are natural appearances of our being in a state of 
 degradation, (part ii, chap, v ;) and we cer- ourunfavora^ 
 tainly are in a condition which does not seem^ ^ound^for'a)m" 
 by any means, the most advantageous we p*^"**^- 
 could imagine or desire, either in our natural or moral 
 capacity, for securing either our present or future inter- 
 est. However, this condition, low and careful and un- 
 certain as it is, does not afford any just ground of com- 
 plaint. For as men may manage their temporal affairs 
 with prudence, and so pass their days here on earth i;i 
 tolerable ease and satisfaction l^y a moderate degree of 
 care ; so likewise with regard to religion, there is no 
 more required than what they are well able to do, and 
 what they must be greatly wanting to themselves if they 
 neglect.* And for persons to have that put upon them 
 
 * This is an unsatisfactory statement, but judging of sentiments 
 that are incorrect, or expressions imperfectly guarded, it is only just 
 to take into consideration the well-known views of the author. Bui- 
 
I20 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 which they are well able to go through, and no more, we 
 naturally consider as an equitable thing, supposing it 
 done by proper authority. Nor have we any more rea- 
 son to complain of it, with regard to the Author of na- 
 ture, than of his not having given us other advantages 
 belonging to other orders of creatures. 
 
 7. But the thing here insisted upon is, that the state 
 of trial which religion teaches us we are in, is rendered 
 Trial credible Credible by its being throughout uniform, 
 i^yln'both^con- ^^^ ^f a piece with the general conduct of 
 ditions. Providence toward us, in all other respects 
 
 within the compass of our knowledge. Indeed, if man- 
 kind, considered in their natural capacity as inhabitants 
 of this world only, found themselves from their birth to 
 thair death in a settled state of security and happiness, 
 without any solicitude or thought of their own, or if they 
 
 ler did not reject the doctrine of the fall of man. The criticism of 
 Chalmers on this passage seems to us harsh when he says of Butler, 
 " We fear that he here makes the first, though not the only, exhibi- 
 tion which occurs in the work of his meager and moderate theology. 
 There seems no adequate view in the passage of man's total inability 
 for what is spiritually and acceptably good ; for by the very analogy 
 which he institutes, the doctrine of any special help to that obedience 
 which qualifies for heaven is kept out of sight. . . . There is no ac- 
 count made here of that peculiar helplessness which obtains in matters 
 of religion, and does not obtain in the matters of ordinary prudence, 
 yet a helplessness which forms no excuse, lying as it does in the resolute, 
 and, by man himself, unconquerable aversion of his will to God and 
 holiness." That the argument, properly used, is good, Chalmers ad- 
 mits when he says, " There is nothing in this (helplessness) to break 
 the analogies on which to found the negative vindication that forms 
 the great and undoubted achievements of this volume, and with which, 
 perhaps, it were well if both its authoi and its readers would agree to 
 be satisfied. The analogy lies here, that if a man wills to obtain 
 prosperity in this life, he may, if observant of the rules which experi- 
 ence and wisdom prescribe, in general, make it good. And if he wills 
 to attain to blessedness in the next life, he shall, if observant of what 
 religion prescribes, and in conformity with the declaration that he 
 who seeketh ftndeth, most certainlv make it good." 
 
Chap. IV.] Of a State of Trial. I2i 
 
 were in no danger of being brought into inconveniences 
 and distress by carelessness or the folly of passion, 
 through bad example, the treachery of others, or the 
 deceitful appearances of things; were this our natural 
 condition, then it might seem strange, and be some pre- 
 sumption against the truth of religion, that it represents 
 our future and more general interest, as not secure of 
 course, but as depending upon our behavior, and re- 
 quiring recollection and self-government to obtain it. 
 For it might be alleged, " What you say is our condi- 
 tion in one respect is not in any wise of a sort with what 
 we find, by experience, our condition is in another. 
 Our whole present interest is secured to our hands with- 
 out any solicitude of ours, and why should not our fu- 
 ture interest, if we have any such, be so too.?" But 
 since, on the contrary, thought and consideration, the vol- 
 untary denying ourselves many things which we desire, 
 and a course of behavior far from being always agreeable 
 to us, are absolutely necessary to our acting even a com- 
 mon decent and common prudent part, so as to pass 
 with any satisfaction through the present world, and be 
 received upon any tolerable good terms in it ; since this 
 is the case, all }. .resumption against self-denial and at- 
 tention being necessary to secure our higher interest is 
 removed. 
 
 Had we not experience, it might, perhaps, speciously 
 be urged that it is improbable any thing of hazard and 
 danger should be put upon us by an infinite Being, when 
 every thing which is hazard and danger in our manner 
 .of conception, and will end in error, confusion, and 
 niisery, is now already certain in his foreknowledge. 
 And, indeed, why any thing of hazard and -vvhy are we 
 danger should be put upon such frail creat- '"^''^^'-'"^ 
 ures as we are, may well be thought a difficulty in spec- 
 ulation ; and cannot bu^ be so till we know the whole, or, 
 however, much more, of "^hti case. But still the consli- 
 
122 Analogy of Religion. LPart L 
 
 tution of nature is as it is. Our happiness and misery 
 are trusted to our conduct, and made to depend upon it. 
 Somewhat, and in many circumstances a great deal too, 
 is put upon us, either to do or to suffer, as we choose. 
 And all the various miseries of life which people bring 
 upon themselves by negligence and folly, and might 
 have avoided by proper care, are instances of this ; 
 which miseries are, beforehand, just as contingent and 
 undetermined as their conduct, and left to be determined 
 by it. 
 
 8. These observations are an answer to the objections 
 against the credibility of a state of trial, as implying 
 What this chap- temptations, and real danger of miscarrying 
 ter shows. ^^^^.j^ regard to our general interest, under 
 
 the moral government of God ; and they show, that if 
 we are at all to be considered in such a capacity, and 
 as having such an interest, the general analogy of Prov- 
 idence must lead us to apprehend ourselves in danger 
 of miscarrying, in different degrees, as to this interest, 
 by our neglecting to act the proper part belonging to us 
 in that capacity. For we have a present interest, under 
 the government of God which we experience here upon 
 earth. And this interest, as it is not forced upon us, so 
 neither is it offered to our acceptance, but to our ac- 
 quisition ; in such sort, as that we are in danger of miss- 
 ing it, by means of temptations to neglect or act contrary 
 to it; and without attention and self-denial, must and 
 do miss of it. It is then perfectly credible, that this 
 may be our case with respect to that chief and final 
 good which religion proposes to us. 
 
 NOTE. 
 
 To the forcible reasoning of this chapter, many will object thai the 
 difference between temporal and eternal things is so vast the cases 
 are not analogous. It cannot be denied, for it is a matter of open and 
 daily observation, that loss, misery, and punishment follow neglect and 
 misconduct here; but the doctrine is re'sisteJ and rHv-entetl as an in- 
 
Chap. IVJ Of a State of Trial. 123 
 
 credible outrage, that a ruined eternity should follow from the same 
 causes. But the analogy is complete in kind, and the difference be- 
 tween the two hardships is only in degree. This difference of degree 
 of suffering can form no basis for an objection unless it can be shown 
 that similar results should not follow from similar causes in the two 
 staf.es of being. The principle would seem plain, that if there is in- 
 ' justice in the one case there is injustice in the other. What would be 
 wrong on a great scale is wrong on a small one. Many seem ready 
 to acquiesce in the operation of an unjust principle in smaller mat- 
 ters which they would regard as intolerable in things of higher mo- 
 ment. But he that is unjust in that which is least is unjust in much. 
 The admission that the divine government is unjust in what may 
 seem to be little and temporar}^ matters would impeach the righteous- 
 ness of God and destroy all reverence for his character. 
 
 It would be well for those who are ready to claim that the good- 
 ness manifested to man is a compensation for what they admit is an 
 injustice to the lower orders of animals, in their suffering and de- 
 struction, to remember the consequences to which their principles 
 would lead. 
 
 The admission of this doctrine might force on our attention the 
 uncomfortable suggestion that our happiness, present and future, ma) 
 be sacrificed, and as a compensation there may be increased blessed- 
 ness given to beings far higher and nobler than we. Once admit in- 
 justice in any part of the divine government, and there is no conceiv- 
 able limit to the extent to which it may be carried. There is no 
 injustice in the dependence on each other of different orders of beings, 
 or in any part of God's government. We know but parts of his ways 
 and but little of his universe, but all the analogies of nature as well 
 as the teachings of his Word assure us he has done all things well. 
 He is just and holy in all his ways, and there is no unrighteousness 
 in him. Consult Chalmers. 
 
124 Analogy of Religion. LPart I. 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 OF A STATE OF PROBATION, AS INTENDED FOR MORAL 
 DISCIPLINE AND IMPROVEMENT* 
 
 FROM the consideration of our being in a probation- 
 state of so much difficulty and hazard, naturally 
 Probation rte- ariscs the qucstion, how we came to be 
 pfoN^uient "ki placcd in it. But such a general inquiry as 
 viitue. ^.j^jg would be found involved in insuperable 
 
 difficulties. For though some of these difficulties would 
 be lessened by observing that all wickedness is volun- 
 tary, as is implied in its very notion, and that many of 
 the miseries of life have apparent good effects, yet when 
 we consider other circumstances belonging to both, and 
 what must be the consequence of the former in a life to 
 come, it cannot but be acknowledged plain folly and 
 presumption to pretend to give an account of the whole 
 reasons of this matter; the wholp reasons of our being 
 allotted a condition out of which so much wickedness 
 and misery, so circumstanced, would in fact arise. 
 Whether it be not beyond our faculties not only to find 
 out, but even to understand, the whole account of this; 
 or, though we should be supposed capable of under- 
 standing it, yet, whether it would be of service or 
 prejudice to us to be informed of it, is impossible to say. 
 But as our present condition can in nowise be shown 
 
 * [The present chapter stands in the same relation to the one pre- 
 ceding it, which that on the moral does to that on the natural gov- 
 ernment of God. It still treats of probation, but of probation with a 
 particular end — even that of schooling men in the practice, so as to 
 confirm them in the habits, of virtue. — Chalmers.] 
 
C'hap.V.J Of a State of Moral Discipline. 125 
 
 inconsistent with the perfect moral government of God, 
 so religion teaches us we were placed in it that we 
 might qualify ourselves, by the practice of virtue, for 
 another state, which is to follow it. And this, thouj;h 
 but a partial answer, a very partial one indeed, to the 
 inquiry now mentioned, yet is a more satisfactory an- 
 swer to another, which is of real and of the utmost im- 
 portance to us to have answered — the inquiry. What is our 
 business here ? The known end, then, why we are placed 
 in a state of so much affliction, hazard, and difficulty is, 
 our improvement in virtue and piety, as the requisite 
 qualification for a future state of security and happiness. 
 
 1. Now the beginning of life, considered as an educa- 
 tion for mature age in the present world, appears plainly 
 at first sisfht, analo2;ous to this our trial for 
 
 ° ' ° . . Probation of 
 
 a future one ; the former bemg, in our tem- youth, itsanai- 
 poral capacity, what the latter is in our re- 
 ligious capacity. But some observations common to 
 both of them, and a more distinct consideration of each, 
 will more distinctly show the extent and force of the 
 analogy between them ; and the credibility which arises 
 from hence, as well as from the nature of the thing, that 
 the present life was intended to be a state of discipline 
 for a future one. 
 
 2. I. Every species of creatures is, we see, designed 
 for a particular way of life, to which the nature, the ca- 
 j^acities temper, and qualifications of each Man's sdapta- 
 species are as necessary as their external ^^^ Sid^to'Tbi 
 circumstances. Both come into the notion f'^^'^'e state. 
 of such state, or particular way of life, and are constitu- 
 ent parts of it. Change a man's capacities or ch^acter 
 to the degree in which it is conceivable they may be 
 changed, and he would be altogether incapable of a 
 human course of life and human happiness ; as incapa- 
 ble as if, his nature continuing unchanged, he were 
 placed in a world where he -had no- sphere of action, nor 
 
r26 Analogy of Religion. [Par/ I 
 
 any objects to answer his appetites, passions, and affec- 
 tions of any sort. One thing is set over against another, 
 as an ancient writer expresses it.* Our nature corre- 
 sponds to our external condition. Without this corre- 
 spondence there would be no possibility of any such 
 thing as human life and human happiness : which life 
 and happiness are, therefore, a result from our nature 
 and condition jointly; meaning by human life, not liv- 
 ing in the literal sense, but the whole complex notion 
 commonly understood by those words. So that without 
 determining what will be the employment and happi- 
 ness, the particular life, of good men hereafter, there 
 must be some determinate capacities, some necessary 
 character and qualifications, without which persons can- 
 not but be utterly incapable of it ; in like manner as 
 there must be some without which men would be inca- 
 pable of their present state of life. Now, 
 
 3. II. The constitution of human creatures, and in- 
 .^ ... deed, of all creatures which come under 
 
 Adaptation ac- 
 quired through our noticc, is such, as that they are ca- 
 
 habit . ^ . 
 
 pable of naturally becoming qualified for 
 states of life, for which they were once wholly un- 
 qualified. In imagination, we may indeed conceive 
 of creatures, as incapable of having any of their fac- 
 ulties naturally enlarged, or as being unable natural- 
 ly to acquire any new qualifications ; but the faculties 
 of every species known to us are made for enlargement, 
 for acquirements of experience and habits. We find 
 ourselves, in particular, endued with capacities, not only 
 of perceiving ideas, and of knowledge or perceiving 
 tiuth, but also of storing up our ideas and knowledge by 
 memory. We are capable, not only of acting, and of 
 having different momentary impressions made upon us, 
 
 * [All things are double one against another: and He hath made 
 nothing imperfect. One thing establisheth the good of another : and 
 who shall ho. filled witlj beholding his glory ! — Ecclus. xlii, 24. 25] 
 
Chap. v.] Of a State of Moral Disciplini!:. 137 
 
 but of getting a new facility in any kind of action, and 
 of settled alterations in our temper or character. The 
 power of the two last is the power of habits. But nei- 
 ther the perception of ideas, nor knowledge of any sort, 
 are habits, though absolutely necessary to the forming 
 of them. How^ever, apprehension, reason, memory, 
 which are the capacities of acquiring knowledge, are 
 greatly improved by exercise. Whether the word habit 
 is applicable to all these improvements, and in particu- 
 lar how far the powers of memory and of habits may be 
 powers of the same nature, I shall not inquire. But 
 that perceptions come into our minds readily and of 
 course, by means of their having been there before, 
 seems a thing of the same sort, as readiness in any par- 
 ticular kind of action proceeding from being accustomed 
 to it. And aptness to recollect practical observations 
 of service in our conduct is plainly habit in many cases. 
 There are habits of perception and habits of action. 
 An instance of the former is our constant and even in- 
 voluntary readiness in correcting the impressions of our 
 sight concerning magnitudes and distances, so as to sub- 
 stitute judgment in the room of sensation, impercepti- 
 bly to ourselves. And it seems as if all other associa- 
 tions of ideas, not naturally connected, might be called 
 passive habits, as properly as our readiness in under- 
 standing languages upon sight, or hearing of words. 
 And our readiness in speaking and writing them is an 
 instance of the latter, of active habits. 
 
 For distinctness, we may consider habits as belonging 
 to the body or the mind, and the latter will nabitsofbody 
 be explained by the former. Under the ^'''i*'"*^- 
 former are comprehended all bodily activities or mo- 
 tions, whether graceful or unbecoming, which are owing 
 to use ; under the latter, general habits of life and con- 
 duct, such as those of obedience and submission to au- 
 thority, or to any particular person ; those of veracity, 
 
128 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 justice, and charity; those of attention, industry, sell- 
 government, envy, revenge. And habits of this latter 
 kind seem produced by repeated acts, as well as the 
 former. And in like manner, as habits belonging to the 
 body are produced by external acts, so habits of the 
 mind are produced by the exertion of inward practical 
 principles; that is, by .carrying them into act, or acting 
 upon them — the principles of obedience, of veracity, 
 justice, and charity. Nor can those habits be formed by 
 any external course of action otherwise than as it pro- 
 ceeds from these principles ; because it is only these 
 inward principles exerted which are strictly acts of 
 obedience, of veracity, of justice, and of charity. So, 
 likewise, habits of attention, industry, self-government, 
 are in the same manner acquired by exercise ; and hab- 
 its of envy and revenge by indulgence, whether in out- 
 ward act or in thought and intention, that is, inward act ; 
 for such intention is an act. Resolutions also to do 
 well are properly acts. And endeavoring to enforce 
 upon our own minds a practical sense of virtue, or to 
 beget in others that practical sense of it which a man 
 really has himself, is a virtuous act. All these, there- 
 fore, may and will contribute toward forming good hab- 
 its. But going over the theory of virtue in one's thoughts, 
 talking well, and drawing fine pictures of it — this is so 
 far from necessarily or certainly conducing to form a 
 habit of it in him who thus employs himself, that it may 
 harden the mind in a contrary course, and render it 
 gradually more insensible, that is, form a habit of insen- 
 sibility to all nioral considerations. For, from our very 
 faculty of habits, passive impressions, by being repealed, 
 grow weaker. Thoughts, by often passing through the 
 mind, are felt less sensibly; being accustomed to danger 
 begets intrepidity, that is, lessens fear; to disucss, les- 
 sens the passion of pity ; to instances of others' mortality, 
 If'ssens the sensible apprehension of our own. 
 
CnAi\V.l Of a State of Moral Discipline. 129 
 
 And from these two observations together, that prac- 
 tical habits are formed and strengthened by repeated 
 acts, and that passive impressions grow as active habits 
 weaker by being repeated upon us, it must p^si^e impn-s- 
 follow that active habits may be gradually "onsgiwweak 
 forming and strengthening, by a course of acting upon 
 such and such motives and excitements, while these 
 motives and excitements themselves are, by proportion- 
 able degrees, growing less sensible ; that is, are contin- 
 ually less and less sensibly felt, even as the active habits 
 strengthen. And experience confirms this ; for active 
 principles, at the very time that they are less lively in 
 perception than they were, are found to be somehow 
 wrought more thoroughly into the temper and character, 
 and become more effectual in influencing our practice. 
 The three things just mentioned may afford instances 
 of it. Perception of danger is a natural excitement of 
 passive fear and active caution ; and by being inured to 
 danger, habits of the latter are gradually wrought, at the 
 same time that the former gradually lessens. Perception 
 of distress in others is a natural excitement, passively to 
 pity, and actively to relieve it ; but let a man set him- 
 self to attend to, inquire out, and relieve distressed per- 
 sons, and he cannot but grow less and less sensibly af- 
 fected with the various miseries of life with which he 
 must become acquainted ; when yet, at the same time, 
 benevolence, considered not as a passion but as a prac- 
 tical principle of action, will strengthen ; and while he 
 passively compassionates the distressed less, he will ac- 
 quire a greater aptitude actively to assist and befriend 
 them. So also, at the same time that the daily instance? 
 of men's dying around us give us daily a less sensible 
 passive feeling or apprehension of our own mortality, 
 such instances greatly contribute to the strengthening a 
 practical regard to it in serious men; that is, to forming 
 
 a habit of acting with a constant view to it. 
 9 
 
130 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 And this seems again further to show, that passive im- 
 pressions made upon our minds by admonition, experi- 
 ence, example, though they may have a remote efficacy, 
 
 ... 1. v.. ^^''d a very great one, toward forming active 
 
 Active habits . 
 
 formed by exer- habits, yet cau have this efficacy no other- 
 
 tion, . -^ . >, . 
 
 Wise than by mducmg us to such a ct)urse 
 of action ; and that if^s not being affected so and so, 
 but acting, which forms those habits ; only it must be 
 always remembered, that real endeavors to enforce good 
 impressions upon ourselves are a species of virtuous ac- 
 tion. Nor do we know how far it is possible, in the na- 
 ture of things, that effects should be wrought in us at 
 once equivalent to habits,* that is, what is wrought by 
 use and exercise. However, the thing insisted upon is, 
 not what may be possible, but what is in fact the ap- 
 pointment of nature, which is, that active habits are to 
 be formed by exercise. Their progress may be so grad- 
 ual as to be imperceptible in its steps; it may be hard 
 to explain the faculty by which we are capable of hab- 
 its, throughout its several parts, and to trace it up to its 
 original, so as to distinguish it from all others in our 
 mind ; and it seems as if contrary effects were to be 
 ascribed to it. But the thing in general, that our na- 
 ture is formed to yield in some such manner as this, to 
 use and exercise, is matter of certain experience. 
 
 Thus, by accustoming ourselves to any course of ac- 
 tion, we get an aptness to go on — a facility, readiness 
 Newcharacter ^.nd often pleasure in it. The inclinations 
 formed by habit. yy\^\^\^ rendered us averse to it grow weaker; 
 the difficulties in it, not only the imaginary but the real 
 cues, lessen ; the reasons for it offer themselves of course 
 
 * [In some of the miracles there seems to have been effects pro- 
 duced at once, equivalent to habits, as in the gift of tongues ; and as 
 pointed out by Dr. Drought (in Dean Graves' Works) in the miracle 
 by which the blind man was enabled to tise the sight which had been 
 miraculously .f;iven to him. — F] 
 
Chap. v.] Of. a State of Moral Discipline. 131 
 
 to our thoughts upon all occasions ; and the least glimpse 
 of them is sufficient to make us go on in a course of ac- 
 tion to which we have been accustomed. And practical 
 principles appear to grow stronger, absolutely in them- 
 selves, by exercise, as well as relatively, with regard to 
 contrary principles ; which by being accustomed to sub- 
 mit, do so habitually and of course. And thus a new 
 character, in several respects, may be formed ; and 
 many habitudes of life, not given by nature, but which 
 nature directs us to acquire. 
 
 4. III. Indeed we may be assured, that we should 
 never have had these capacities of improving by experi- 
 ence, acquired knowledge, and habits, had improvement 
 they not been necessary, and intended to neces^arTtothe 
 be made use of. And accordingly we find e?en the mati"?- 
 them so necessary, and so much intended, tyofourpowers. 
 that without them we should be utterly incapable of 
 that which was the end for which we were made, con- 
 sidered in our temporal capacity only ; the employments 
 and satisfactions of our mature state of life. 
 
 Nature does in nowise qualify us wholly, much less 
 'at once, for this mature state of life. Even maturity of 
 understanding and bodily strength are not only arrived 
 to gradually, but are also very much owing to the con- 
 tinued exercise of our powers of body and mind from 
 infancy. But if we suppose a person brought into the 
 world with both these in maturity, as far as this is con- 
 ceivable, he would plainly at first be as unqualified for 
 the human life of mature age as an idiot. He would 
 be in a manner distracted with astonishment, and appre- 
 hension, and curiosity, and suspense ; nor can one guess 
 how long it would be before he would be familiarized to 
 himself, and the objects about him, enough even to set 
 himself to any thing. It may be questioned, too, wheth- 
 er the natural information of his sight and hearing would 
 Ik- of jny m;innt'r of use at all :o him in irtir/', befoKi 
 
132 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 experience, And it seems that men would be strangely 
 headstrong and self-willed, and disposed to exert them- 
 selves with an impetuosity which would render society 
 insupportable, and the living in it impracticable, were it 
 not for some acquired moderation and self-government, 
 some aptitude and readiness in restraining themselves, 
 and concealing their sense of things. Want of every 
 thing of this kind which is learned would render a man 
 as incapable of society as want of language would ; or 
 as his natural ignorance of any of the particular employ- 
 ments of life would render him incapable of providing 
 himself with the common conveniences, or supplying the 
 necessary wants of it. In these respects, and probably 
 in many more of which we have no particular notion, 
 mankind is left by nature an unformed, unfinished crea- 
 ture, utterly deficient and unqualified, before the ac- 
 quirement of knowledge, experience, and habits, for that 
 mature state of life which was the end of his creation, 
 considering him as related only to this world. 
 
 5. But then, as nature has endued us with a power of 
 
 supplying those deficiencies by acquired knowledge, ex- 
 
 „ perience, and habits ; so, likewise, we ard 
 
 Childhood fa- ^ . ' .... . . , 
 
 vorabie to im- placed in a condition m infancy, childhood, 
 
 proveinent. , ^ , . . ^ , . 
 
 and youth, fitted for it; fitted for our ac- 
 quiring those qualifications of all sorts which we stand 
 in need of in mature age. Hence children, from their 
 very birth, are daily growing acquainted with the objects 
 about them, with the scene in which they are placed, 
 and to have a future part ; and learning somewhat or 
 other necessary to the performance of it. The sub')r- 
 dinations to which they are accustomed in domestic IlIc, 
 teach them self-government in common behavior abroad 
 and prepare them for subjection and obedience to civil 
 authority. What passes before their eyes, and daily 
 happens to them, gives them experience, caution against 
 treachery and deceit, together with numberless iittle 
 
Chap. V.J Of a State of Moral Discipline. 133 
 
 rules of action and conduct which we could not live 
 without, and which are learned so insensibly and so per- 
 fectly as to be mistaken, perhaps, for instinct, though 
 they are the effect of long experience and exercise; as 
 much so as language, or knowledge in particular busi- 
 ness, or the qualifications and behavior belonging to the 
 several ranks and professions. Thus the beginning of 
 our days is adapted to be, and is, a state of education in 
 the theory and practice of mature life. We are much 
 assisted in it by example, instruction, and the care of 
 others ; but a great deal is left to ourselves to do. And 
 of this, as part is done easily and of course, so part re- 
 quires diligence and care, the voluntary foregoing many 
 things which we desire, and setting ourselves to what we 
 should have no inclination to, but for the necessity or 
 expedience of it. For that labor and industry which 
 the station of so many absolutely requires they would be 
 greatly unqualified for in maturity; as those in other 
 stations would be for any other sorts of application, if 
 both were not accustomed to them in their youth. And 
 according as persons behave themselves, in the general 
 education which all go through, and in the particular 
 ones adapted to particular employments, their character 
 is formed, and made appear; they recommend them- 
 selves more or less ; and are capable of, and placed in, 
 different stations in the society of mankind.* 
 
 * [We are too apt to overlook the effect of actions on the actor, 
 (which is often the chief effect,) in improving or impairing his owi> 
 powers. A razor used to cut wood or stone is not only put to an im- 
 p-oper use, but spoiled for the use which is proper. But this is but a 
 faint illustration. The razor may be sharpened again; but how shall 
 we restore a blunted sensibility, or enfeebled judgment, or a vitiated 
 appetite. Our wrong-doing inflicts worse results on ourselves than 
 on our victims, and the evil may spread disaster over our whole fu- 
 ture. Hence the young make a fatal blunder when they suppose :\n 
 occasional indulgence or impropriety may be compatibk: with gen- 
 eral welfare and improvement. — ikLvLCUM.J 
 
134 Analogy of Religion. [Part I 
 
 6. The former part of life, then, is to be considered 
 as an important opportunity which nature puts into our 
 
 The probation hands, and which, when lost, is not to be 
 gourto^hSor recovered. And our being placed in a state 
 the future. ^f discipline, throughout this life, for anoth- 
 er world, is a providential disposition of things, exactly 
 of the same kind as our being placed in a state of dis- 
 cipline during childhood, for mature age. Our condi- 
 tion in both respects is uniform and of a piece, and 
 comprehended under one and the same general law of 
 nature. 
 
 And if we are not able at all to discern how, or in 
 what way, the present life could be our preparation for 
 
 Iterance of another, this would be no objection against 
 fec«rtopToba: the credibility of its being so. For we do 
 ****"• not discern how food and sleep contribute 
 
 to the growth of the body, nor could have any thought 
 that they would, before we had experience. Nor do 
 children at all think, on the one hand, that the sports 
 and exercises to which they are so much addicted 
 contribute to their health and growth ; nor, on the oth- 
 er, of the necessity which there is for their being re- 
 strained in them ; nor are they capable of understanding 
 the use of many parts of discipline which, nevertheless, 
 they must be made to go through, in order to qualify 
 them for the business of mature age. Were we not able, 
 then, to discover in what respects the present life could 
 form us for a future one, yet nothing would be more 
 supposable than that it might, in some respects or other. 
 from the general analogy of providence. And this, loj 
 aught I see, might reasonably be said, even though we 
 should not take in the consideration of God's m }ral 
 government over the world. But, 
 
 7. IV. Take in this consideration, and consequ( ntly 
 that the character of virtue and piety is a necessary 
 qualification for the future state, and then we may dis 
 
Chap. v.] Of a State of Moral Discipline. 135 
 
 tinctly see how, and in what respects, the present life 
 may be a preparation for it; since we want^ Howthemode 
 atid an capable of, improvement in that char- ™^^ -noM-n. 
 acter, by moral and religious habits ; and the present life is 
 fit to be a state of discipline for such improve me?tt ; in like 
 manner, as we have already observed, how and in what 
 respects infancy, childhood, and youth are a necessary 
 preparation, and a natural state of discipline, for ma- 
 ture age. 
 
 8. Nothing which we at present see would lead us to 
 the thought of a solitary inactive state hereafter; but, 
 if we judge at all from the analogy of nature, Active virtues 
 
 4. J' 4- i.\^ o '^i. in a fature life. 
 
 we must suppose, according to the bcript- 
 ure account of it, that it will be a community. And 
 there is no shadow of any thing unreasonable in conceiv- 
 ing, though there be no analogy for it, that this com- 
 munity will be, as the Scripture represents it, under the 
 more immediate, or, if such an expression may be used, 
 the more sensible, government of God. Nor is our ig- 
 norance, what will be the employments of this happy 
 community, nor our consequent ignorance, what partic- 
 ular scope or occasion there will be for the exercise of 
 veracity, justice, and charity, among the members of it 
 with regard to each other, any proof that there will be* 
 no sphere of exercise for those virtues. Much less, if 
 that were possible, is our ignorance any proof that there 
 will be no occasion for that frame of mind or character 
 which is formed by the daily practice of those particu- 
 lar viitues here, and which is a result from it. This at 
 least must be owned in general, that as the government 
 established in the universe is moral, the character of vir- 
 tr.t and piety must, in some way or other, be the condi- 
 tion of our happiness, or the qualification for it. 
 
 9. Now from what is above observed concerning our 
 natural power of habits, it is easy to see that we are 
 capable of moral improvement by discipline. And how 
 
136 Analogy of Religion. [Part 1. 
 
 greatly we want it, need not be proved to any one who 
 _ , is acquainted with the great wickedness of 
 
 Virtuous habits . . ° . 
 
 a guard against mankind, or even with those imperfections 
 
 error. . ... 
 
 which the best are conscious of, But it is 
 
 not, perhaps, distinctly attended to by every one, that 
 
 the occasion which human creatures have for discipline 
 • • . . . 
 
 to improve in them this character of virtue and piety, is 
 
 to be traced up higher than to excess in the passions by 
 indulgence and habits of vice. Mankind, and perhaps 
 all finite creatures, from the very constitution of their 
 nature^ before habits of virtue, are deficient, and in 
 danger of deviating from what is right, and therefore 
 stand in need of virtuous habits for a security against 
 this danger.* For, together with the general principle 
 of moral understanding, we have in our inward frame 
 various affections toward particular external objects. 
 These affections are naturally, and of right, subject to 
 the government of the moral principle as to the occa- 
 sions on which they may be gratified ; as to the times, de- 
 grees, and manner, in which the objects of them may be 
 pursued; but then the principle of virtue can neither 
 excite them nor prevent their being excited. On the 
 
 * [It is from this point of view that Aristotle determines ovt' uoa 
 ^vaei ovre Trapa (pvaiv kyytvovrai. at apeTai, aXka TvecftVKoai fuv TjfMli^ 
 (M^aadat avTuc, TEXetovfif:voig 6e 6ia rov edovg. — Ethic. N'icom., iii, i. 
 " In order to understand this, it is to be observed that virtue may be 
 considered either as the quaHty of an action or as the quahty of a per- 
 son. Considered as the quality of an action, it consists, even accord- 
 ing to Aristotle, in the reasonable moderation of the affection from 
 which the action proceeds, whether' this moderation be habitual to 
 the jierson or not. Considered as the quality of the person, 't. con* 
 ;ists in the habit of this reasonable moderation, in its having become 
 .the customary and usual disposition of the mind. ... If a single 
 action was sufficient to stamp the character of any virtue upon the 
 person who performed it, the most worthless of mankind might lay 
 claim to all the virtues ; since there is no man who has not, upon 
 some occasions, acted with prudence, justice, temperance, and forti- 
 tude."-T-Smith's Moral Sent., part vi. sec. 2. — F.J 
 
Chap. v.] Of a State of Moral Discipline. 137 
 
 contrary, they are naturally felt^ when the objects of 
 them are present to the mind, not only before all con- 
 sideration whether they can be obtained by lawful means, 
 bu<;>.after it is found they cannot. For the natural ob- 
 jects of affection continue so; the necessaries, conven- 
 iences, and pleasures of life remain naturally desirable, 
 tho^igh they cannot be obtained innocently ; nay, though 
 they cannot possibly be obtained at all. And when the 
 objects of any affection whatever cannot be obtained 
 without unlawful means, but may be obtained by them, 
 such affection, though its being excited, and ifk contin- 
 uing some time in the mind, be as innocent as it is nat- 
 ural and necessary, yet cannot but be conceived to have 
 a tendency to incline persons to venture upon such un- 
 lawful means, and therefore must be conceived as put- 
 ting them in some danger of it. 
 
 Now what is the general security against this danger 
 — against their actually deviating from ri2:ht.'' 
 
 ^ . ^ ^ ^ . Virtuous h:ib- 
 
 As the danger is, so, also, must the security its a security 
 
 . , . ~ . , . . , against vice. 
 
 be from withm, from the practical principle 
 of virtue.* And the strengthening or improving this 
 principle, considered as practical or as a principle of ac- 
 tion, will lessen the danger or increase the security 
 against it. And this moral principle is capable of im- 
 
 * It may be thought, that a sense of interest would as effectually 
 restrain creatures from doing wrong. But if by a sense of interest is 
 meant a speculative conviction or belief that such and such indul- 
 gence would occasion them greater uneasiness, upon the whole, than 
 satisfaction, it is contrary to pi^esent experience to say that this sense 
 rf interest is sufficient to restrain them from thus indulging them- 
 aehes. And if by 2^. sense of interest is meant a practical regard to 
 wlu'.t is upon the whole our happiness, this is not only coincident with 
 the principle of virtue or moral rectitude, but is a part of the idea 
 itself And, it is evident, this reasonable self-love wants to be im- 
 proved as really as any principle in our nature. For we daily see it 
 overmatched, not only by the more boisterous passions, but by curi- 
 osity, shame, love of imitation — by any thing, even indolence — es- 
 pecially if the interest, the temporal interest, suppose, which is the 
 
13S Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 provement, by proper discipline and exercise; by recol- 
 lecting the practical impressions which example and 
 experience have made upon us ; and, instead of follow- 
 ing humor knd mere inclination, by continually attend- 
 ing to the equity and right of the case, iti whatever we 
 are engaged, be it in greater or less ^matters, and accus- 
 toming ourselves always to act upon it, as being itself 
 the just and natural motive of action ; and as this moral 
 course of behavior must necessarily, under divine gov- 
 ernment, be our final interest. Thus the principle of 
 virtue^ improved into a habit ^^ of which i?nprove7nent we are 
 thus capable^ will plainly be, in proportion to the strength 
 of ity a secu7'ity against the danger which finite creatures 
 are in, from the very nature of propension or particular 
 affections. This way of putting the matter supposes par- 
 ticular affections to remain in a future state, which it is 
 scarce possible to avoid supposing. And if they do, we 
 clearly see that acquired habits of virtue and self-gov- 
 ernment may be necessary for the regulation of them. 
 However, though we were not distinctly to take in this 
 supposition, but to speak only in general, the thing really 
 comes to the same. For habits of virtue thus acquired 
 by discipline are improvement in virtue ; and improve- 
 ment in virtue must be advancement in happiness, if 
 the government of the universe be moral. 
 
 10. From these things we may observe, and it will 
 
 end of such self-love, be at a distance. So greatly are profligate men 
 mistaken when they affirm they are wholly governed by interested- 
 ness and self-love ; and so little cause is there for moralists to dis- 
 claim this principle. (See pp. it6, 117.) 
 
 * [We do not understand that under the economy of grace the 
 law of habit has been repealed, or any other indeed of those laws of 
 our mental nature on which Butler proceeds in the reasoning of th:<s 
 chapter. Whatever the pretensions and expedients of the Gospel 
 might be for the perfecting of our meetness for heaven, they super- 
 sede not the efficacy of that process under which, by reason of use, the 
 senses are exercised to discern between good and evil. — Chalmers.] 
 
Chap. v.] Of a State of Moral Discipline. 1 39 
 
 further show this our natural and original need of being 
 improved by discipline, how it comes to pass that creat- 
 ures made upright, fall ; and that those who How upright 
 preserve their uprightness, by so doing raise ^^"^s^^^^- 
 themselves to a more secure state of virtue. To say 
 that the former is accounted for by the nature of liberty, 
 is to say no more than that an event's actually happen- 
 ing is accounted for by a mere possibility of its happen- 
 ing. But it seems distinctly conceivable from the very 
 nature of particular affections or propensions. For 
 suppose creatures intended for such a particular state 
 of life, for which such propensions were necessary; sup- 
 pose them endued with such propensions, together with 
 moral understanding, as well including a practical sense 
 of virtue as a speculative perception of it ; and that all 
 these several principles, both natural and moral, form- 
 ing an inward constitution of mind, were in the most 
 exact proportion possible ; that is, in a proportion the 
 most exactly adapted to their intended state of life ; 
 such creatures would be made upright, or finitely per- 
 fect. Now particular propensions, from their very na- 
 ture, must be felt, the objects of them being present, 
 though they cannot be gratified at all, or not with the 
 allowance of the moral principle. But if they can be 
 gratified without its allowance, or by contradicting it 
 then they must be conceived to have some tendency, in 
 how low a degree soever — yet some tendency — to induce 
 persons to such forbidden gratification. This ter.dency 
 in some one particular propension may be Tho made u- 
 increased, by the greater frequency of occa- ^"*'^**^ 
 sions naturally exciting it, than of occasions exciting 
 others. The least voluntary indulgence in forbidden 
 circumstances, though but in thought, will increase this 
 wrong tendency, and may increase it further, till, pecul- 
 iar conjunctures perhaps conspiring, it becomes effect; 
 and danger of deviating from right, ends in actual de- 
 
140 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 viation from it : a danger necessarily arising frcmi the 
 very nature of propension, and which therefore could 
 not 'have been prevented though it might have been 
 escaped, or got innocently through. The case would be, 
 as if we were to suppose a straight path marked out for 
 a person, in which such a degree of attention would 
 keep him steady; but if he would not attend in this de- 
 gree, any one of a thousand objects catching his eye might 
 lead him out of it. Now it is impossible to say how 
 much even the first full overt act of irregularity might 
 disorder the inward constitution, unsettle the adjust- 
 ments, and alter the proportions which formed it, and 
 in which the uprightness of its make consisted. But 
 repetition of irregularities would produce habits : and 
 thus the constitution would be spoiled, and creatures, 
 made upright become corrupt and depraved in their 
 settled character, proportionably to their repeated irreg- 
 ularities in occasional acts. But, on the contrary, these 
 creatures midit have improved and raised 
 
 Ho-w such be- 
 
 ings might rise themsclves to a higher and more secure 
 state of virtue by the contrary behavior, by 
 steadily following the moral principle, supposed to be 
 one part of their nature, and thus withstanding that un- 
 avoidable danger of defection, which necessarily arose 
 from propension, the other part of it. For by thus pre- 
 serving their integrity for some time their danger would 
 lessen, since propensions, by being inured to submit, 
 would do it more easily and of course ; and their secur- 
 ity against this lessening danger would increase, since 
 the moral principle would gain additional strength by 
 ij.xercise; both which things are implied in the notion 
 oi vrtuous habits.* 
 
 * Butler's statement how creatures made upright fall, and *iow 
 they are restored to righteousness, has been severely criticised. In 
 it, Chahners says, we see the meagerness of his Christianity. It is 
 alleged that in this chapl-^t man's fall is represented as gradual, like 
 
Chap. v.] Of a State of Moral Discipline. 141 
 
 Tluis, then, vicious indulgence is not only criminal in 
 itself, but also depraves the inward constitution and 
 character. And virtuous self-government is not only 
 right in itself, but also improves the inward constitution 
 or character; and may improve it to such a degree, that 
 though, we should suppose it impossible for particular 
 affections to be absolutely coincident with the moral 
 principle, and consequently should allow that such 
 creatures as have been above supposed would forever 
 remain defectible ; yet their danger of actually deviat- 
 ing from right may be almost infinitely lessened, and 
 they fully fortified against what remains of it; if that 
 may be called danger against which there is an adequate 
 effectual security. But still, this their higher perfection 
 may continue to consist in habits of virtue formed in a 
 state of discipline, and this their more complete security 
 remain to proceed from them. 
 
 And thus it is plainly conceivable, that creatures with- 
 
 the departure, by slight variations, from a straight line, and that in 
 his recovery from his lost condition nothing more is required than a 
 strenuous, earnest exertion to change his course, to break the power 
 of old habits and form new ones. In the Scripture the fall of man is 
 represented as sudden and complete. By a single act man passed 
 into a state of ruiii. His recovery by his own effort is impossible. 
 Gracious ability must be imparted by the Holy Spirit. This is ever 
 and freely offered, and under its influence, not gradually, but by one 
 act, man becomes reconciled to God and justified through the merit of 
 Christ. 
 
 In the day rnan ate the forbidden fruit he " died," but in the mo- 
 ment he believed on Christ he passed from death into life and justi- 
 fication. The statement of Butler might have been better guarded 
 against misapprehension, but we do not see that it contradicts the 
 Bible doctrine. On any theoiy the first act must have been sudden, 
 and Butler says it is impossible to tell how much disorder and evil 
 mignt result from it ; what he says about the formation and power of 
 habit cannot be denied. The fall and consequent depravity is not 
 the lowest condition possible to man, nor is the state of justification 
 the highost. There are degrees of guilt and goodness that under 
 nuin'scircumst.T.nces depend on his efforts and hab'ts. 
 
H- Analogy of Religion. IPart I. 
 
 out blemish as they came out of the hands of God, may be 
 Perfectbeings ^^ danger of going wrong, and so may stand 
 mayfau. -^^ need of the security of virtuous habits, 
 
 additional to the moral principle wrought into their na- 
 tures by him. That which is the ground of their dan- 
 ger, or their want of security, may be considered as a 
 deficiency in them, to which virtuous habits are the nat- 
 ural supply. And as they are naturally capable of be- 
 ing raised and improved by discipline, it may be a thing 
 fit and requisite that they should be placed in circum- 
 stances with an eye to it; in circumstances. peculiarly 
 fitted to be, to them, a state of discipline for their im- 
 provement in virtue. 
 
 11. But how much more strongly must this hold with 
 respect to those who have corrupted their natures, are 
 
 „ ^ , fallen from their original rectitude, and 
 
 Greater need . " 
 
 of improvement whosc passions are become excessive by 
 
 in fallen beings. . . _ , . . 
 
 repeated violations of their inward constitu- 
 tion .-* Upright creatures may want to be improved; 
 depraved creatures v/ant to be renewed. Education 
 and discipline, which may be in all degrees and sorts of 
 gentleness and of severity, is expedient for those, but 
 must be absolutely necessary for these. For these, dis- 
 cipline, of the severer sort, too, and in the higher de- 
 grees of it, must be necessary, in order to wear out 
 vicious habits; to recover their primitive strength of 
 self-government, which indulgence must have weakened 
 to repair as well as raise into a habit, the moral princi- 
 ple, in order to their arriving at a secure state of virtu- 
 ous happiness. 
 
 12. Now whoever will consider the thing, may clearly 
 
 see that the present world \^ peculiarly fit to 
 
 This world pe- ^ , . . , . ... 
 
 juUiriy fitted for be a State of discipline for this purpose to 
 
 discipline. , .,, , , , , 
 
 such as Will set themselves to amend and 
 improve. For, the various temptations with which we 
 dre surrounded — our experience of the deceits of >vi'vk. 
 
Chap. v.] Of a State of Moral Discipline. 143 
 
 edness, having been in many instances led wroiig our- 
 selves — the great viciousness of the world — the infinite 
 disorders consequent upon it — our being made acquaint- 
 ed with pain and sorrow, either from our own feeling of 
 it, or from the sight of it in others — these things, though 
 some of them may, indeed, produce wrong effects upon 
 our minds, yet when duly reflected upon have all of 
 them a direct tendency to bring us to a settled modera- * 
 tion and reasonableness of temper; the contrary both to 
 thoughtless levity, and also to that unrestrained self-will 
 and violent bent to follow present inclination, which 
 may be observed in undisciplined minds. 
 
 Such experience, as the present state affords of the 
 frailty of our nature, of the boundless extravagance of 
 ungoverned passion, of the power which an infinite 
 Being has over us by the various capacities of misery 
 which he has given us; in short, that kind and degree 
 of experience which the present state affords us, that the 
 constitution of nature is such as to admit the possibility, 
 the danger, and the actual event of creatures losing 
 their innocence and happiness, and becoming vicious 
 and wretched ; hath a tendency to give us a practical 
 sense of things very different from a mere speculative 
 knowledge that we are liable to vice and capable of 
 misery. And who knows whether the security of crea- 
 tures in the highest and most settled state of perfection 
 may not, in part, arise from their having had such a sense 
 of things as this formed and habitually fixed within 
 them, in some state of probation } And passing through 
 the present world with that moral attention which is 
 necessary to the acting a right part in it, may leave ever- 
 lasting impressions of this sort upon our minds. 
 
 ' But to be a little more distinct: allurements to what 
 is wrong: difficulties in the discharge of our _ ^ 
 
 . . ° . This fitness seen 
 
 duty; our not being able to act a uniform in the efforts to 
 
 . practice virtu& 
 
 n^'ht part without some thought and care ; 
 
144 Analogy of Religion. I Part I 
 
 and the opportunities which we have, or imagine we 
 have, of avoiding what we dislike or obtaining what we 
 desire, by unlawful means, when we either cannot do it 
 at all, or at least not so easily, by lawful ones ; these 
 things, that is, the snares and temptations of vice, are 
 what render the present world peculiarly fit to be a state 
 of discipline to those who will preserve their integrity : 
 because they render being upon our guard, resolution, 
 and the denial of our passions, necessary in order to 
 that end. And the exercise of such particular recollec- 
 tion, intention of mind, and self-government, in the 
 practice of virtue, has, from the make of our nature, a 
 peculiar tendency to form habits of virtue, as implying 
 not only a real, but also a more continued and a more 
 intense exercise of the virtuous principle; or a more 
 constant and a stronger effort of virtue exerted into act. 
 Illustration. Thus supposc a person to know himself to 
 be in particular danger, for some time, of doing any 
 thing wrong, which yet he fully resolves not to do ; con- 
 tinued recollection, and keeping upon his guard, in or- 
 der to make good his resolution, is a continued exerting 
 of that act of virtue in a high degi-ee, which need have 
 been, and perhaps would have been, only instantaneous 
 and weak had the temptation been so. 
 
 It is, indeed, ridiculous to assert that self-denial is 
 essential to virtue and piety; but it would have been 
 Use of self- nearer the truth, though not strictly the 
 denial. xtw\^ itsclf, to havc Said that it is essential 
 
 to discipline and improvement. For though actions 
 materially virtuous, which have no sort of difficulty, but 
 are perfectly agreeable to our particular inclinations^ 
 may possibly be done only from these particular inclina- 
 tions, and so may not be any exercise of the principle of 
 virtue, that is, not be virtuous actions at all; yci, on the 
 »-ontrary, they may be an exercise of that principle, and, 
 when they are, they have a tendency to form and fix the 
 
Cm A i>. V.J Of a State of Moral Discipline. 145 
 
 habit of virtue. But when the exercise of the virtuous 
 principle is more continued, oftener repeated, and more 
 intense, as it must be in circumstances of danger, temp- 
 tation, and difficulty, of any kind and in any deg'-ee, 
 this tendency is increased proportionably, and a more 
 confirmed habit is the consequence. 
 
 13. This undoubtedly holds to a certain length, but 
 how far it may hold I know not. Neither our intel- 
 lectual powers nor our bodily strength can th mo 1 
 be improved beyond such a decree; and powers be ovei 
 
 ^ "^ -111 tasked? 
 
 both may be overwrought. Possibly there 
 may be somewhat analogous to this with respect to the 
 moral character, which is scarce worth considering. 
 And I mention it only, lest it should come into some 
 person's thoughts, not as an exception to the foregoing 
 observations, which perhaps it is, but as a confutation 
 of them, which it is not. And there may be several 
 other exceptions. Observations of this kind cannot be 
 supposed to hold minutely, and in every case. It is 
 enough that they hold in general. And these*plainly 
 hold so far, as that from them may be seen distinctly, 
 which is all that is intended by them, that the present 
 world is peculiarly fit to be a state of discipline for our im- 
 provemefit in virtue and piety; in the same sense as some 
 sciences, by requiring and engaging the attention, not 
 to be sure of such persons as will not, but of such a? 
 will, set themselves to them, are fit to form the mind to 
 habits of attention. 
 
 14. Indeed the present state is so far from proving, in 
 event, a discipline of virtue to the generality of men, that 
 en the contrary they seem to make it a dis- 
 
 ^ ' , . The vice of the 
 
 ciphne of vice. And the viciousness of the worui a disci- 
 
 ,..,.„ pline to virtue. 
 
 worla IS, in different ways, the great tempta- 
 tion which renders it a state of virtuous discipline, in 
 the degree it is to good men. The whole end, and the 
 
 whole occasion, of mankind's being pla/ced in such * 
 10 
 
• 
 
 146 Analogy of Religion. [Part I 
 
 state as the present, is not pretended to be accounted 
 for. That which appears amid the general corruption 
 is, that there are some persons who, having within them 
 the principle of amendment and recovery, attend to and 
 follow the notices of virtue and religion, be they moie 
 clear or more obscure, which are afforded them ; and 
 that the present world is not only an exercise of virtue 
 in these persons, but an exercise of it in ways and de- 
 grees peculiarly apt to improve it ; apt to improve it^ in 
 some respects, even beyond what would be by the ex- 
 ercise of it required in a perfectly virtuous society, or in 
 a society of equally imperfect virtue with themselves. 
 But that the present world does not actually become a 
 The failure of State of moral discipline to many, even to 
 noTiiisprove'^tho the generality, that is, that they do not im- 
 ^"from seeds', P^ove or grow better in it, cannot be urged 
 ^^' as a proof that it was not intended for moral 
 
 discipline by any who at all observe the analogy of na- 
 ture. For of the numerous seeds of vegetables and 
 bodies of animals which are adapted and put in the way 
 to improve to such a point or state of natural maturity 
 and perfection, we do not see, perhaps, that one in a 
 million actually does. Far the greater part of them 
 decay before they are improved to it, and appear to be 
 absolutely destroyed. Yet no one, who does not deny 
 all final causes, will deny that those seeds and bodies 
 which do attain to that point of maturity and per- 
 • fection, answer the end for which they were really de- 
 signed by nature ; and therefore that nature designed 
 them for such perfection. And I cannot forbear adding, 
 though it is not to the present purpose, that the appea-- 
 ance of such an amazing waste in nature, with respect to 
 these seeds and bodies, by foreign causes, is to us as 
 unaccountable as, what is much more terrible, the pres- 
 ent and future ruin of so many moral agents by them- 
 selves, that is. bv vice. 
 
CiiAP.V.J Op a State of Moral Discipline. 147 
 
 15. Against this whole notion of moral discipline it 
 may be objected, in another way, that so far as a course 
 of behavior materially virtuous proceeds 
 
 - , , . . . . . Oh. Such dis- 
 
 from hope and fear, so far it is only a disci- dpime is only of 
 pline and strengthening of self-love.* But 
 doing what God commands, because he commands it, 
 is obedience, though it proceeds from hope or fear. 
 And a course of such obedience will form habits 
 of it : and a constant regard to veracity, justice, and 
 charity, may form distinct habits of these particular vir- 
 tues, and will certainly form habits of self-government, 
 and of denying our inclinations, whenever veracity, just- 
 ice, or charity requires it. Nor is there any foundation 
 for this great nicety, with which some affect to distin- 
 guish in this case, in order to depreciate all religion 
 proceeding from hope or fear. For veracity, justice, and 
 charity, regard to God's authority, and to our own chief 
 interest, are not only all three coincident, but each of 
 them is, in itself, a just and natural motive or principle 
 of action. And he who begins a good life from any one 
 of them, and perseveres in it, as he is already in some 
 degree, so he cannot fail of becoming more and more 
 of that character which is correspondent to the consti- 
 tution of nature as moral, and to the relation which God 
 stands in to us as moral governor of it ; nor, consequent- 
 ly, can he fail of obtaining that happiness which this 
 constitution and rdation necessarily suppose connected 
 witn that character. 
 
 16. These several observations concerning the active 
 principle of virtue, and obedience of God's oh. Passivevir- 
 commands, are applicable to passive sub- !l!notneeded'^ta 
 mission or resignation to his will; which is * fixture state, 
 another essential part of a right character, connected 
 with the former, and very much in our power to form 
 
 * [The reforrnrr hf-rc is no doubt to T ord Shaftesbury's "Irqnii7 
 '"rrireri-iin^ N'iiUk-." jvin iii. J? 3. — V ,\ 
 
14? Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 ourselves to. It may be imagined that nothing but af- 
 flir.tfons can give occasion for or require this virtue; 
 that it can have no respect to, nor be anyway necessary 
 to qualify for a state of perfect happiness ; but it is not 
 experience which can make us think thus. Prosperity 
 itself, while any thing supposed desirable is not ours, be- 
 gets extravagant and unbounded thoughts. Imagination 
 is altogether as much a source of discontent as any thing 
 ii our external condition. It is indeed true that there 
 can be no scope for patience when sorrow shall be no 
 more ; but there may be need of a temper of mind, 
 which shall have been formed by patience. For though 
 self-love, considered merely as an active principle lead- 
 ing us to pursue our chief interest, cannot but be uni- 
 formly coincident with the principle of obedience to 
 God's commands, our interest being rightly understood, 
 because this obedience and the pursuit of our own chief 
 interest must be in every case one and the same thing; 
 yet it mav be questioned whether self-love, considered 
 merely as the desire of our own interest or happiness, 
 can, from its nature, be thus absolutely and uniformly 
 coincident with the will of God, any more than particu- 
 lar affections can (page 122) be coincident in such sort 
 as not to be liable to be excited upon occasions and in 
 degrees impossible to be gratified consistently with the 
 constitution of things, or the divine appointments. So 
 that habits of resignation may, up(5n thu account, be 
 requisite for ah creatures ; habits^ I say, which signify 
 what is formed by use. However, in general, it is ob- 
 vious that both self-love and particular affections in 
 human creatures, considered only as paisive feelings, 
 distort and rend the mind, and therefore stand in need 
 of discipline. Now denial of those particular affections, 
 in a course of active virtue and obedience to God's will, 
 has a tendency to moderate them, and seems also to 
 have a tendency to habituate the mind to be easy and 
 
Chai'.V.J Of a State of Moral Discipline. 149 
 
 satisfied with that degree of happiness which is allotted 
 us, that is, to moderate self-love.* But the proper dis- 
 cipline for resignation is affliction. For a right behav- 
 ior under that trial, recollecting ourselves so as to con- 
 sider it in the view in which religion teaches us to 
 consider it, as from the hand of God — receiving it as 
 what he appoints, or thinks proper to permit, in his 
 world, and under his government — this will habituate 
 the mind to a dutiful submission ; and such submission, 
 together with the active principle of obedience, make 
 up the temper and character in us which answers to his 
 sovereignty, and which absolutely belongs to the condi- 
 tion of our being as dependent creatures. Nor can it 
 be said that this is only breaking the mind to a submis- 
 sion to mere power ; for mere power may be accidental, 
 and precarious, and usurped ; but it is forming within 
 ourselves the temper of resignation to his rightful author- 
 ity, who is, by nature, supreme over all. 
 
 16. Upon the whole, such a character and such qual- 
 ifications are necessary for a mature state of life in the 
 present world, as nature alone does in nowise bestow, 
 but has put it upon us in great part to acquire, in our 
 progress from one stage of life to another from childhood 
 
 * Disengagemeiit is absolutely necessary to enjoyment ; and a 
 person may have so steady and fixed an eye upon his own interest, 
 whatever he places it in, as may hinder him from attending to many 
 gratifications within his reach, which others have their minds />r^ and 
 open to. Over fondness for a child is not generally thought to be for 
 its advantage ; and if there be any guess to be made from appear- 
 ances, surely the character we call selfish is not the most promising 
 f(tr happiness. Such a temper may plainly be, and exert itself in a 
 degree and manner which may give unnecessary and useless solicitudt 
 and anxiety — in a degree or manner which may prevent obtaining 
 iV.e means and materials of enjoyment, as well as the making use of 
 them. Immoderate self-love does very ill consult its own interest ; 
 and how much soever a paradox it may appear, it is certainlv tiiie 
 that, even from self-love, we should endeavor to get over all i lordi- 
 imte regard to ami consideration of ourselves." — SLr;naiis, x\. \j. 12^. 
 
[50 Analogy of Religion. [Part 1. 
 
 to mature age ; put it upon us to acquire them, by giv- 
 ing us capacities of doing it, and by placing us, in the 
 beginning of life, in a condition fit for it. And this is a 
 general analogy to our condition in the present world, 
 as in a state of moral discipline for another. It is in 
 Oh. Troubieand vain, then, to object against the credibility of 
 havftTeenar'fid- ^^^ present life's being intended for this 
 ^' purposes, that all the trouble and the danger 
 
 unavoidably accompanying such discipline might have 
 been saved us by our being made at once the creatures 
 and the characters which we were to be. For we experi- 
 ence that what lue were to be, was to be the effect oi what 
 we would do; and that the general conduct of nature is, 
 not to save us trouble or danger, but to make us capa- 
 ble of going through them, and to put it upon us to do 
 so. Acquirements of our own, experience and habits, 
 are the natural supply to our deficiencies, and security 
 against our dangers ; since it is as plainly natural to set 
 ourselves to acquire the qualifications, as the external 
 things which we stand in need of. In particular, it is 
 as plainly a general law of nature that we should, with 
 regard to our temporal interest, form and cultivate prac- 
 tical principles within us, by attention, use, and disci- 
 pline, as any thing whatever is a natural law; chiefly in 
 the beginning of life, but also throughout the whole 
 course of it. And the alternative is left to our choice, 
 either to improve ourselves and better our condition, or, 
 in default of such improvement, to remain deficient and 
 wretched. It is therefore perfectly credible, from the 
 analogy of nature, that the same may be our rase, \\ ith 
 respect to the happiness of a future state and the qual- 
 ifications necessary for it. 
 
 17. There is a third thing which may seem implied in 
 
 This world a the present world's being a state of proba- 
 
 SS!iay''S/''ch*i^- tion, that it is a theater of action for the 
 
 ^*^^' manifestation of persons' characters, with 
 
Chap.VJ Of a State of Moral Discipline. 151 
 
 respect to a future one ; not, to be sure, to an all-know- 
 ing being, but to his creation, or part of it. This may, 
 perhaps, be only a consequence of our being in a state 
 of probation in the other senses. However, it is not im- 
 possible that men's showing and making manifest what 
 is in their heart, what their real character is> may have 
 respect to a future life in ways and manners which we 
 are not acquainted with ; particularly it may be a means, 
 for the Author of nature does not appear to do any thing 
 without means, of their being disposed of suitably to 
 their characters, and of its being known to the creation, 
 by way of example, that they are thus disposed of. But 
 not to enter upon any conjectural account of this, one 
 may just mention that the manifestation of persons' 
 characters contributes very much, in various ways, to 
 the carrying on a great part of that general course of 
 nature respecting mankind which comes under our ob- 
 servation at present. I shall only add, that probation, 
 in both these senses, as well as in that treated of in the 
 foregoing chapter, is implied in moral government ; since 
 by persons' behavior under it, their characters cannot 
 but be manifested, and if they behave well, improved. 
 
152 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 OF THE OPINION OF NECESSITY,* CONSIDERED AS 
 INFLUENCING PRACTICE. 
 
 THROUGHOUT the foregoing Treatise it appears 
 that the condition of mankind, considered as in- 
 The question to habitants of this world only, and under' the 
 t.e considered, government of God which we experience, is 
 greatly analogous to our condition as designed for an- 
 other world, or under that further government which 
 religion teaches us. If, therefore, any assert, as a fatalist 
 must, that the opinion of universal necessity is recon- 
 cilable with the former, there immediately arises a ques- 
 tion in the way of analogy; whether he must not also 
 own it to be reconcilable with the latter, that is, with 
 the system of religion itself and the proof of it. The 
 reader then will observe, that the question now before 
 us is not absolute, whether the opinion of fate be recon- 
 cilable with religion ; but hypothetical, whether, upon 
 supposition of its being reconcilable with the constitu- 
 tion of nature, it be not reconcilable with religion also ? 
 or what pretense a fatalist — not other persons, but a 
 fatalist — has to conclude, from his opinion, that there can 
 be no such thing as religion ? And as the puzzle and 
 obscurity which must unavoidably arise from arguing* 
 
 * [Necessity is an ambiguous word. There is, i. Logical necessi. 
 ly, which implies that a consequent follows from a premise. 2. Moral 
 necessity, which requires means in order to reach ends. 3. Physical 
 necv-ssity, which implies that in the material world consequences in- 
 fvitably and by compulsion follow antecedents. 4. IvlutaphysicaJ 
 necessity, which belongs to God as existing eternally and immutably. 
 The word is also used in other senses.] 
 
 *. 
 
CiiAF.VI.l Of THE Opinion OF Necessity. iS3 
 
 upon so absurd a supposition as that of universal neces- 
 sity will, I fear, easily be seen, it will, I hope, as easily 
 be excused. 
 
 But since it has been all along taken for granted, as a 
 thing proved, that there is an intelligent authcr of na- 
 ture, or natural governor of the world ; and j^^^sgjty ,^e- 
 since ai. objection may be made against the ^^^y,\rLl" 
 proof of this, from the opinion of universal tfSe."''"' 
 necessitv, as it may be supposed that such 
 necessity will itself account for the origin and preserva- 
 tion of all things, it is requisite that this objection be 
 ' distinctly answered ; or that it be shown that a fatality 
 supposed consistent with what we certainly experience, 
 does not destroy the proof of an intelligent Author and 
 governor of nature, before we proceed to consider, 
 whether it destroys the proof of a moral governor of it, 
 or of our being in a state of religion. 
 
 2. Now, when it is said by a fatalist that the whole 
 constitution of nature and the actions of men, that every 
 thing, and every mode and circumstance of every thing, 
 is necessary, and could not possibly have been other- 
 wise, it is to be observed, that this necessity does not 
 exclude deliberation, choice, preference, and poes not ex- 
 acting from certain principles, and to certain ^^^e design. ^ 
 ends-* because all this is matter of undoubted experi- 
 ence,' acknowledged by all, and what every man may, 
 every moment, be conscious of. And from hence it fol- 
 lows, that necessity, alone and of itself, is in no sort an 
 urcouni of the constitution of nature, and how things 
 came /o he and to continue as they are; but only an ac- 
 count of this circumstance Tei^\:\xi<g to theirorigin and 
 continuance, that they could not have been otherwise 
 than they are and have been. The assertion, that every 
 thincT is by necessity of nature, is not an answer to the 
 ques'tion, Whether the world came into being as it is, by 
 an intelligent anient forming it thus, or not; but to quite 
 
154 Analogy of Religion. [Part I 
 
 another question, Whether it came into beini,^ as it is, in 
 that way and manner which we call necessarily^ or in 
 that way and manner which we call freely. For sup- 
 pose, further, that one who was a fatalist, and one who 
 kept to his natural sense of things and believed himself 
 a free agent were disputing together, and vindicating 
 their respective opinions, and they should happen to 
 instance* in a house, they would agree that it was built 
 by an architect. Their difference concerning necessity 
 and freedom would occasion no difference of judgment 
 concerning this, but only concerning another matter, 
 whether the architect built it necessarily or freely. 
 
 Suppose, then, they should proceed to inquire con- 
 cerning the constitution of nature : in a lax way of 
 speaking, one of them might say it was by necessity, 
 and the other by freedom ; but if they had any meaning 
 to their words, as the latter must mean a free agent so 
 the former must at length be reduced to mean an agent, 
 whether he would say one or more, acting by necessity ; 
 for abstract notions can do nothing. Indeed, we ascribe 
 to God a necessary existence, uncaused by any agent. 
 For we find within ourselves the idea of infinity, that is, 
 immensity and eternity, impossible, even in imagination, 
 to be removed out of being. We seem to discern intui- 
 tively that there must, and cannot but be, somewhat ex- 
 ternal to ourselves answering this idea, or the archetype 
 of it. And from hence (for this abstract, as much as any 
 other, implies a concrete^ we conclude that there is, and 
 cannot but be, an infinite and immense eternal Eeirg 
 existing, prior to all design contributing to his existence, 
 and exclusive of it.f And from the scantiness of lan- 
 
 * [ Take a house as an instance or illustration.] 
 
 \ [This argument is taken by Butler from Dr. Clarke. Like all ol 
 Clarke's attempted demonstrations of the being of God, it has been 
 closely scrutinized, and its validity questioned. See, for instance, 
 Duke's Analysis of Butler's Analogy, Appendix, p. '■\'},.\ 
 
Chap. VI.] Of the Opinion of Necessity. i 
 
 DO 
 
 guage, a manner of speaking has been introduced, that 
 necessity is the foundation, the reason, the account of 
 tlie existence of God. But it is not alleged, nor can it 
 be at all intended, that every thing exists as it does by 
 diis kind of necessity, a necessity antecedent in nature 
 to design ; it cannot, I say, be meant that every thing 
 exists as it does by this kind of necessity upon several 
 accounts, and particularly, because it is admitted that 
 design in the actions of men contributes to many alter- 
 ations in nature. For if any deny this, I shall not pre- 
 tend to reason vvith them. 
 
 From these things it follows, first. That when a fatal- 
 ist asserts that every thing is by necessity^ he Conclusions. 
 must mean, by an agent acting necessarily : he must, I say, 
 mean this ; for I am very sensible he would not choose 
 to mean it : and, secondly. That the necessity by which 
 sucli an agent is supposed to act, does not exclude in- 
 telligence and design. So that were the system of fatal- 
 ity admitted, it would just as much account for the 
 formation of the world as for the structure of a house, 
 and no more. Necessity as much requires and supposes 
 a necessary agent as freedom requires and supposes a 
 free agent to be the former of the world. And the ap- 
 pearances of design and o{ fifial causes in the constitution 
 of nature, as really prove this acting agent to be an in- 
 telligent designer^ or to act from choice, upon the scheme 
 of necessity, supposed possible, as upon that of freedom. 
 
 3. It appearing thus, that the notion of necessity does not 
 destroy the proof that there is an intelligent 
 
 ■' ^ ° Necessity de- 
 
 author of nature and natural governor of the stroys not tho 
 
 . proof of religion. 
 
 world, the present question, w^hich the anal- 
 ogy before-mentioned (page 152) suggests, and which, I 
 think, it will answer, is this : Whether the opinion of 
 necessity, supposed consistent with possibility, with the 
 constitution of the world, and the natural government 
 which we experience exercised over it, destroys all rea- 
 
I $6 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 sonable ground of belief that we are in a state of relig- 
 ion ; or whether that opinion be reconcilable with relig- 
 ion, with the system and the proof of it. 
 
 Suppose, then, a fatalist to educate any one from his 
 youth up in his own principles; that the child should 
 impmcticabio Tcason upon them, and conclude that since 
 'r education, etc, j^g cannot possibly bchavc otherwise than 
 he does he is not a subject of blame or commendation, 
 nor can deserve to be rewarded or punished; imagine 
 him to eradicate the very perceptions of blame and 
 commendation out of his mind by means of this system ; 
 to form his temper, and character, and behavior to it ; 
 and from it to judge of the treatment he was to expect, 
 say, from reasonable men, upon his coming abroad into 
 the world; as the fatalist judges from this system what 
 he is to expect from the author of nature, and with re- 
 gard to a future state. I cannot forbear stopping here 
 to ask, whether any one of common sense would think 
 fit that a child should be put upon these speculations 
 and be left to apply them to practice ? And a man has 
 little pretense to reason who is not sensible that we are 
 all children in speculations of this kind. However, the 
 child would doubtless be highly delighted to find him- 
 self freed from the restraints of fear and shame with 
 which his playfellows were fettered and embarrassed, 
 and highly conceited in his superior knowledge, so far 
 beyond his years. But conceit and vanity would be the 
 least bad part of the influence which these principles 
 must have, when thus reasoned and acted upon, during 
 the course of his education. He must either be allowed 
 to go on, and be the plague of all about him, and him- 
 self too, even to his own destruction, or else correction 
 must be continually made use of to supply the want of 
 those natural perceptions of blame and commendation 
 which we have supposed to be removed, and to give him 
 a practical impression of what he had reasoned himself 
 
Chaj'. V'f.] Of the Opinion of Necessity. 157 
 
 out of the belief of, that he was in fact an accountable 
 child, and to be punished for doing what he was forbid. 
 It is therefore, in reality, impossible but that the cor- 
 rection which he must meet with in the course of his 
 education must convince him, that if the scheme he was 
 instructed in were not false, yet, that he reasoned in- 
 conclusively upon it, and, somehow or other, misapplied 
 it to practice and common life; as what the fatalist ex- 
 periences of the conduct of Providence at present ought, 
 in all reason, to convince him, that this scheme is misap- 
 plied when applied to the subject of religion. (Page 153.) 
 But supposing the child's temper could remain still 
 formed to the system, and his expectation of the treat- 
 ment he was to have in the world be regulated by it, so 
 as to expect that no reasonable man would blame or 
 punish him for any thing which he should do, because 
 he could not help doing it; upon this supposition, it is 
 manifest he would, upon his coming abroad into the 
 world, be insupportable to society, and the treatment 
 which he would receive from it would render it so to 
 him ; and he could not fail of doing somewhat very soi^n 
 for which he would be delivered over into the hands of 
 civil justice. And thus, in the end, he would be con- 
 vinced of the obligations he was under to his wise 
 instructor. 
 
 Or suppose this scheme of fatality in any other way 
 ai^plied to practice, such practical application of it will 
 be found equally absurd, equally fallacious, in a practi- 
 cal sense : for instance, that if a man be destined to li\e 
 such a time, he shall live to it, though he take no care 
 of his own preservation ; or if he be destined to die before 
 that time, no care can prevent it; therefore all care 
 about preserving one's life is to be neglected; which is 
 the fallacy instanced in by the ancients. -^^ .ibsurdJty 
 But now, on the contrary, none of these infr^^o"^- 
 practical absurdities can be drawn from reasoning upon 
 
158 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 the supposition that we are free ; but all such reason- 
 ing, with regard to the common affairs of life, is justified 
 by experience. And therefore, though it were admitted 
 that this opinion of necessity were speculatively true, 
 yet with regard to practice, it is as if it were false, so far 
 as our experience reaches; that is, to the whole of our 
 present life. For the constitution of the present world, 
 and the condition in which we are actually placed, is as 
 if we were free. And it may, perhaps, justly be con- 
 cluded that since the whole process of action, through 
 every step of it, suspense, deliberation, inclining one 
 way, determining, and at last doing as we determine, is 
 as if we were free, therefore we are so.* But the thing 
 here insisted upon is, that under the present natural 
 government of the world we find we are treated and 
 dealt with as if we were free, prior to all consideration 
 
 * [Compare Berkeley's Minute Philosopher, dial, vii, § 20 : — 
 
 " Euphr. Tell me, Alciphron, do you think it involves a contra- 
 diction that God should make man free ? 
 
 ^' Ale. I do not. 
 
 '^ Etiphr. It is then possible that there may be such a thing? 
 
 ''Ale. This I do not deny. 
 
 " Etiphr. Would not such a one think that he acted, and condemn 
 himself for some actions, and approve himself for others, etc. ? Tell 
 me, now, M'hat other characters of your supposed free agent may not 
 be found in man ? " 
 
 So Clarke, Remarks on Collins' Inquiry, p. 24 : " As to that which 
 this gentleman calls the fourth (but which is, indeed, the only) ac- 
 tion of man, namely, DOING as we will, or actually exerting this self- 
 moving faculty. Of this I say, as before, that since, in all cases, it 
 does now, by experience, seem to us to be free, that is, seems to us to 
 be really a self-moving power, exactly in the same manner as it would 
 do upon supposition of our being actually free agents ; the bare phys- 
 ical possibility of our being so framed by the Author of nature, as to be 
 unavoidably deceived in this matter by every experience of every action 
 we perform, is no more any just ground to doubt the truth of our lib- 
 erty, than the bare natural possibility of our being all our life-time, as 
 in a dream, deceived in our belief of the existence of the materiil 
 world, is any just ground to doubt of the reality of its existence " — F .] 
 
Chap. VI.] Of the Opinion of Necessity. 159 
 
 whether we are or not. Were this opinion, therefore, of 
 necessity, admitted to be ever so true, yet such is i-^ 
 fact our condition and the natural course of Necessity mis- 
 things, that whenever we apply it to life and e^ceVo the pies- 
 practice, this application of it always mis- «°tandfutmc. 
 leads us, and cannot but mislead us, in a most dreadful 
 manner, with regard to our present interest. And how 
 can people think themselves so very secure, then, that 
 the same application of the same opinion may not mis- 
 lead them also, in some analogous manner, with respect 
 to a future, a more general, and more important interest ? 
 For religion being a practical subject, and the analogy 
 of nature showing us that we have not faculties to apply 
 this opinion, were it a true one, to practical subjects; 
 whenever we do apply it to the subject of religion, and 
 thence conclude that we are free from its obligations, it 
 is plain this conclusion cannot be depended upon. 
 There will still remain just reason to think, whatever 
 appearances are, that we deceive ourselves ; in some- 
 what of a like manner as when people fancy they can 
 draw contradictory conclusions from the idea of infinity. 
 From these things together, the attentive reader will 
 see it follows, that if upon supposition of ^^-eedom the 
 evidence of religion be conclusive, it re- ^^ .^ ^ 
 
 o . Necessity does 
 
 mains so upon supposition of necessity ; be- not destroy re- 
 
 . . ,. llgion. 
 
 cause the notion of necessity is not applica- 
 ble to practical subjects; that is, with respect to them 
 is as if it were not true. Nor does this contain any re- 
 flection upon reason, but only upon what is unreasona- 
 ble. For to pretend to act upon reason in opposition 
 to practical principles which the Author of our nature 
 gave us to act upon, and to pretend to apply our reason to 
 subjects with regard to which our own short views, and 
 even our experience, will show us it cannot be depended 
 upon, — and such at best the subject of necessity must 
 be.-T-this is vanitv, conceit, and unreasonableness. 
 
i6o Analogy of Religion. FPart I. 
 
 4. But this is not all. For we find within ourselves a 
 will, and are conscious of a character. Now if this in 
 
 us be reconcilable with fate, it is reconcila- 
 
 Not incompat- 
 ible with God's ble with It in the author of nature. And 
 
 moral character. . 
 
 besides, natural government and final causes 
 imply a character and a will in the governor and de- 
 signer;* a will concerning the creatures whom he gov- 
 erns. The author of nature, then, being certainly of 
 some character or other, notwithstanding necessity, it is 
 evident this necessity is as reconcilable with the partic- 
 ular character of benevolence, veracity, and justice in 
 him'j which attributes are the foundation of religion as 
 with any other character; since we find this necessity 
 no more hinders men from being benevolent than cruel ; 
 true, than faithless ; just, than unjust ; or, if the fatalist 
 pleases, what we call unjust. For it is said, indeed, that 
 what, upon supposition of freedom, would be just pun- 
 ishment, upon supposition of necessity becomes mani- 
 festly unjust; because it is punishment inflicted for do- 
 ing that which persons could not avoid doing. As if 
 the necessity which is supposed to destroy the injustice 
 of murder, for instance, would not also destroy the in- 
 justice of punishing it. However, as little to the purpose 
 as this objection is in itself, it is very much to the purpose 
 to observe from it how the notions of justice and injus- 
 tice remain, even while we endeavor to suppose them 
 removed; how they force themselves upon the mind, 
 even while we are making suppositions destructive of 
 them : for there is not, perhaps, a man in the world, 
 but would be ready to make this objection at first 
 thought. 
 
 5. But though it is most evident that universal neces- 
 
 * By will and character is meant that which, in speaking of men 
 we should express, not only by these word?, but also by the words 
 temper, taste, disposition, practical principles ; that whole franu 
 of mind from whence ive act in a/be maitner rcuther tk<7H another. 
 
Chap. VI.] Of the Opinion of Necessity. i6i 
 
 sity, if it be reconcilable with any thing, is reconcilable 
 with that character in the author of nature which is the 
 foundation of religion ; " Yet, does it not ^ 
 
 " ' . Does n(»t de- 
 
 plainlv destroy the proof that he is of that stroy the proa/ 
 
 , , ,■ , c r of religion. 
 
 character, and consequently the proof of 
 religion .'* " By no means. For we find that happiness 
 and misery are not our fate in any such sense as not to be 
 the consequences of our behavior, but that they are the 
 consequences of it, (chap, ii.) We find God exercises 
 the same kind of government over us with that which a 
 father exercises over his children, and a civil magistrate 
 over his subjects. Now whatever becomes of abstract 
 questions concerning liberty and necessity, it evidently 
 appears to us that veracity and justice must be the nat- 
 ural rule and measure of exercising this authority, or 
 government, to a being who can have no competitions, 
 or interfering of interests, with his creatures and his 
 subjects. 
 
 6. But as the doctrine of liberty, ttiough we experi- 
 ence its truth, may be perplexed with difficulties which 
 run up into the most abstruse of all specu- other proofs 
 lations, and as the opinion of necessity ^o^ affected, 
 seems to be the very basis upon which infidelity grounds 
 itself, it may be of some use to offer a more particular 
 proof of the obligations of religion, which may dis- 
 tinctly be shown not to be destroyed by this opinion. 
 
 The proof from final causes of an intelli- Final causes, etc 
 gent author of nature is not affected by the opinion of 
 necessity; supposing necessity a thing possible in itself, 
 and reconcilable with the constitution of things, (page 
 152, etc.) And it is a matter of fact, independent on 
 this or any other speculation, that he governs the world 
 b^ the method of rewards and punishments, (chap, ii;) 
 and also that he hath given us a moral faculty, by which 
 we distinguish between actions, and approve some as 
 virtuous and of good desert, and disapprove others as vi- 
 11 
 
1 02 Analogy of Religion. [Part 1. 
 
 cious and of ill desert, (Dissertation ii.) Now this moral 
 discernment implies, in the notion of it, a rule of action, 
 and a rule of a very peculiar kind; for it carries in it 
 authority and a right of direction ; authority in such a 
 sense, as that we cannot depart from it without being 
 self-condemned.* And that the dictates of this moral 
 faculty, which are by nature a rule to us, are moreover 
 the laws of God, laws in a sense including sanctions, 
 may be thus proved. Consciousness of a rule or guide 
 of action, in creatures who are capable of considering it 
 as given them by their maker, not only raises immedi- 
 ately a sense of duty, but also a sense of security in fol- 
 lowing it, and of danger in deviating from it. A direc- 
 tion of the author of nature, given to creatures capable 
 of looking upon it as such, is plainly a command from 
 him : and a command from him necessarily includes in 
 it, at least, an implicit promise in case of obedience, or 
 threatening in case of disobedience. But then the sense 
 or perception of good and ill desert, (Dissertation ii,) 
 which is contained in the moral discernment, renders 
 the sanction explicit, and makes it appear, as one may 
 say, expressed. For since his method of government is 
 to reward and punish actions, his having annexed to 
 some actions an inseparable sense of good desert, and 
 to others of ill, this surely amounts to declaring upDn 
 whom his punishments shall be inflicted, and his re- 
 wards be bestowed. For he must have given us this 
 discernment and sense of things^ as a presentiment of 
 what is to be hereafter; that is, by way of information 
 beforehand, what we are finally to expect in this world. 
 There is, then, most evident ground to think that the 
 government of God, upon the whole, will be found to 
 correspond to the nature "which he has given us, and 
 that in the upshot and issue of things happiness and 
 misery shall, in fact and event, be made to follow virtue 
 * Sermon ii at the Rolls. 
 
Chap. VI.] Of the Opinion of Necessity. 163 
 
 and vice respectively; as he has already, in so peculiar 
 a manner, associated the ideas of them in our minds. 
 And from hence might easily be deduced the obliga- 
 tions of religious worship, were it only to be considered 
 as a means of preserving upon our minds a sense of this 
 moral government of God, and securing our obedience 
 to it ; which yet is an extremely imperfect view of that 
 most important duty. 
 
 7. Now I say, no objection from necessity c^n lie 
 against this general proof of religion ; none against the 
 proposition reasoned upon, that we have Necessity pre- 
 such a moral faculty and discernment; be- ikMi'to^'his* gen- 
 cause this is a mere matter of fact, a thing ^""^^ p''**.;^*- 
 of experience, that human kind is thus constituted : 
 none against the conclusion; because it is immediate, 
 and wholly from this fact. For the conclusion that God 
 will finally reward the righteous and punish the wicked, 
 is not here drawn, from its appearing to us fit* that he 
 should^ but from its appearing that he has told us he will. 
 And this he hath certainly told us in the promise and 
 threatening which, it hath been observed, the notion of 
 
 * However, I am far from intending to deny that the will of God is 
 determined by what is fit, by the right and reason of the case ; though 
 one chooses to decline matters of such abstract speculation, and to 
 speak with caution when one does speak of them. But if it be intel- 
 ligible to say, that it is Jit and 7-easonahle for every one to consult his 
 own happiness, then fitness of action, or the right and reason of the 
 case, is an intelligible manner of speaking. And it seems a> incon- 
 ceivable to suppose God to approve one course of action, or one end, 
 j.refcrably to another, which .yet his acting at all from design implies 
 '.hat he does, without supposing somewhat prior in that end to be 
 the ground of the preference ; as to suppose him to discern an ab- 
 stu»>.ct proposition to be tiiie, without supposing somewhat prior to it 
 to be the ground of the discernment. It doth not, therefore, ap- 
 pear, that moral right is any more relative to perception than abstract 
 truth is ; or that it is any moie improper to speak of the fitness ana 
 rightness of actions and ends, as founded in the nature of things, ihan 
 to speak of abstract truth is> thus founded. ^ 
 
164 Analogy of Religion. [Part I 
 
 a command implies, and the sense of good and ill desert 
 which he has given us more distinctly expresses. And 
 this reasoning from fact is confirmed, and in some de- 
 gree even verified, by other facts ; by the natural ten- 
 dencies of virtue and of vice, (page 99 ;) and by this, that 
 God, in the natuial course of his providence, punishes 
 vicious actions as mischievous to society, and also 
 vicious actions as such, in the strictest sense, (page 90, 
 etc.) So that the general proof of religion is unanswer- 
 ably real, even upon the wild supposition which we are 
 arguing upon. 
 
 8. It must likewise be observed further, that natural 
 reli2;ion hath, besides this, an external evi- 
 
 Does not affect . . ... 
 
 external e\i- deucc, which the doctrinc of necessity, if it 
 could be true, would not affect. For sup- 
 pose a person, by the observations and reasoning above, 
 or by any other, convinced of the truth of religion ; that 
 there is a God, who made the world, who is the moral 
 governor and judge of mankind, and will, upon the 
 whole, deal with every one according to his works; I 
 say, suppose a person convinced of this by reason, but 
 to know nothing at all of antiquity, or the present state 
 of mankind, it would be natural for such a one to be in- 
 quisitive, what was the history of this system of doc- 
 trine ; at what time, and • in what manner, it came first 
 into the world; and whether it were believed by any 
 considerable part of it. And were he upon inquiry to 
 find, that a particular person, in- a late age, first of all 
 proposed it as a deduction of reason, and that mankind 
 were before wholly ignorant of it; then, though its evi- 
 dence from reason would remain, there would be no ad- 
 ditional probability of its truth from the account of its 
 discovery. But instead of this being the fact of the 
 case, on the contrary, he would find what could not but 
 afford him a very strong confirmation of its truth : First 
 That somew^Kit of this system, with more or fewer addi- 
 
Chap. VIJ Of the Opinion of Necessity 165 
 
 tions and alterations, hath been professed in all ages 
 and countries of which we have any cetlain information 
 relating to this matter. Secondly, That it is certain his- 
 torical fact, so far as we can trace things up, that this 
 whole system of belief, that there is one God, the creator 
 and moral governor of the world, and that mankind is 
 in a state of religion, was received in the first ages. 
 And, Thirdly, That as there is no hint or intimation 
 in history that this system was first reasoned out; so 
 there is express historical or traditional evidence, as an- 
 cient as history, that it was taught first by revelation. 
 Now these things must be allowed to be of great weight. 
 The first of them, general consent, shows this system to 
 be conformable to the common sense of mankind. The 
 second, namely, that religion was believed in the first 
 ages of the world, especially as it does not appear that 
 there were then any superstitious or false additions to it, 
 cannot but be a further confirmation of its truth. For it 
 is a proof of this alternative — either that it came into the 
 world by revelation, or that it is natural, obvious, and 
 forces itself upon the mind. The former of these is the 
 conclusion of learned men. And whoever will consider 
 how unapt for speculation rude and uncultivated minds 
 are, will, perhaps, from hence alone be strongly inclined 
 to believe it the truth. And as it is shown in the sec- 
 ond part (chap, ii) of this Treatise, that there is nothing 
 of such peculiar presumption against a revelation in th- 
 beginning of the world as there is supposed to be against 
 subsequent ones; a skeptic could not, I think, give any 
 account which would appear more probable, even to 
 himself, of the early pretenses to revelation, than by 
 supposing some real original one from whence they were 
 copied. And the third thing above-mentioned, that 
 there is express historical or traditional evidence, as an- 
 cient as history, of the system of religion being taught 
 mankind by revelation ; this must be admitted as some 
 
1 66 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 degree of real proof that it was so taught. For why 
 should not the most ancient tradition be admitted as some 
 additional proof of a fact against which there is no pre- 
 sumption ? And this proof is mentioned here, because 
 it has its weight, to show that religion came into the 
 world by revelation, prior to all consideration of the 
 proper authority of any book supposed to contain it ; 
 and even prior to all consideration whether the revela- 
 tion itself be uncorruptly handed down and related, or 
 mixed and darkened with fables. Thus the historical 
 account which we have of the origin of religion, taking 
 in all circumstances, is a real confirmation of its truth, 
 no way affected by the opinion of necessity. And the 
 external evidence, even of natural religion, is by no 
 means inconsiderable. 
 
 9. But it is carefully to be observed, and ought to be 
 recollected after all proofs of virtue and religion, which 
 
 Proofs liable to ^"^^ Only general, that as speculative reason 
 neglect. ^^^ y^^ neglected, prejudiced, and deceived, 
 
 so also may our moral understanding be impaired and 
 perverted, and the dictates of it not impartially attended 
 to. This, indeed, proves nothing against the reality of 
 our speculative or practical faculties of perception ; 
 against their being intended by nature to inform us in 
 the theory of things, and instruct us how we are to be- 
 have, and what we are to expect, in consequence of our 
 behavior. Yet our liableness, in the degree we are lia- 
 ble, to prejudice and perversion, is a most serious ad- 
 monition to us to be upon our guard with respect to 
 what is of such consequence as our determinations con- 
 cerning virtue and religion; and particularly not to take 
 custom, and fashion, and slight notions of honor, or im- 
 aginations of present ease, use, and convenience to 
 mankind, for the only moral rule. (Dissertation ii.) 
 
 . ip. The foregoing observations, drawn from the na- 
 ture of the thing and the history of religion, amount. 
 
Chap. VI.] Of the Opinion of Necessity. 167 
 
 wiiePi taken together, tc a real practical proof of it not to 
 be confuted ; such a proof as, considering the Necessity makes 
 infinite importance of the thing, I apprehend Jid'^punish-'^^* 
 would be admitted fully sufficient, in reason, n^ents ai.surd. 
 to influence the actions of men who act upon thought 
 and reflection ; if it were admitted that there is no proof 
 of the contrary. But it may be said : " There are many 
 probabilities which cannot, indeed, be confuted; that 
 is, shown to be no probabilities, and yet may be over- 
 balanced by greater probabilities on the other side; 
 much more by demonstration. And there is no occa- 
 sion to object against particular arguments alleged far 
 an opinion, when the opinion itself may be clearly 
 shown to be false, without meddling with such argu- 
 ments at all, but leaving them just as they are. (Pages 
 ^;^, 42.) Now the method of government by rewards 
 and punishments, and especially rewarding and punish- 
 ing good and ill desert, as such, respectively, must go 
 upon supposition that we are free, and not necessary 
 agents.* And it is incredible, that the author of nature 
 should govern us upon a supposition as true, which he 
 knows to be false ; and therefore absurd to think he will 
 reward or punish us for our actions hereafter; especially 
 that he will do it under the notion that they are of good 
 or ill desert." Here, then, the matter is brought to a 
 point. And the answer to all this is full, and not to be 
 evaded : that the whole constitution and course of 
 things, the whole analogy of providence shows, beyond 
 possibility of doubt, that the conclusion from this rea- 
 soning is false, wherever the fallacy lies. The doctrine 
 of freedom, indeed, clearly shows where — in supposing 
 ourselves necessary, when «in truth we are free agents. 
 But upon the supposition of necessity, the fallacy lies in 
 faking for granted that it is incredible necessary agents 
 sliould be rewarded and punished. But that, somehow 
 * See note at the end of this chapter. 
 
1 68 Analogy of Religion. [Pari I. 
 
 or other, the conclusion now mentioned is false, is most 
 certain. For it is fact that God does gov- 
 
 This reasoninj? i j r 
 
 MToneous— how em cvcn brute creatures by the method oi 
 
 shown. , . , . , , 
 
 rewards and punishments, m the natural 
 course of things. And men are rewarded and punished 
 for their actions ; punished for actions mischievous 10 
 society as being so ; punished for vicious actions as such, 
 by the natural instrumentality of each other; under the 
 present conduct of Providence. Nay, even the affection 
 of gratitude, and the passion of resentment, and the re- 
 wards and punishments following from them, which in 
 general are to be considered as natural, that is, from the 
 author of nature : these rewards and punishments, be- 
 ing naturally* annexed to actions considered as imply- 
 ing good intention and good desert, ill intention and ill 
 desert — these natural rewards and punishments, I say, 
 are as much a contradiction to the conclusion above, 
 and show its falsehood, as a more exact and complete 
 rewarding and punishing of good and ill desert, as such. 
 So that if it be incredible that necessary agents should 
 be thus rewarded and punished, then men are not nec- 
 essary, but free ; since it is matter of fact that they are 
 thus rewarded and punished. But if, on the contrary, 
 which is the supposition we have been arguing upon, it 
 be insisted that men are necessary agents, then there is 
 nothing incredible in the further supposition of neces- 
 sary agents being thus rewarded and punished, since 
 we ourselves are thus dealt with. 
 
 II. From the whole, therefore, it must follow that a 
 necessity supposed possible, and reconcilable with :he 
 ':onstitution of things, does in no sort prove that the 
 author of nature will not, nor destroy the proof that he 
 will, finally and upon the whole, in his eternal govern- 
 ment, render his creatures happy or miserable, by some 
 means or other, as they behave well or ill. Or, to ex- 
 • • ' * Sermon viii at the Rolls. 
 
Chap. VI. 1 Of the Opinion of NecessiIy. i6^) 
 
 press this conclusion in words conformable to the titlvj 
 of .the chapter, the analogy of nature shows opinion of no 
 us, that the opinion of necessity, considered <'®^'>*^J'*"'*'^®- 
 as practical, is false. And if necessity, upon the sup 
 position above-mentioned, doth not destroy the proof o. 
 natural religion, it evidently makes no alteration in the 
 proof of revealed. 
 
 From these things, likewise, we may learn in what 
 sense to understand that general assertion, that the 
 opinion of necessity is essentially destructive The sense in 
 of all religion. Firs^, In a practical sense; ^^'1^;^^ 
 that by this notion atheistical men pretend *^°' 
 to satisfy and encourage themselves in vice, and justify 
 to others their disregard to all religion. And secondly. 
 In the strictest sense ; that it is a contradiction to the 
 whole constitution of nature, and to what we may every 
 moment experience in ourselves, and so overturns everv 
 thing. But by no means is this assertion to be under- 
 stood, as if necessity, supposing it could possibly be 
 reconciled with the constitution of things, and wifh what 
 we experience, were not also reconcilable with religion ; 
 for upon this supposition it demonstrably is so. 
 
 [NOTE.— See page 167.] 
 
 [We must carefully distinguish between the religious and the irre- 
 ligious necessitarians. The question between the maintainers of free 
 will and the religious necessitarians is this: When I blame [or coni- 
 inend] myself for an action, is there necessarily involved in this moral 
 judgment the consciousness that, under all the circumstances prect a- 
 ing the act of volition, I might have 7£a7/<f</ otherwise ? The religious 
 necessitarian holds the negative • the maintainer of free will, the af- 
 firmative ; and the irreligious fatalists so far agree with the latter. 
 They sgy that the sense or persuasion of liberty is requisite to consti- 
 tute the sense of responsibility for the past, — requisite as a ground of 
 hope or purpose for the future ; that, without it, there would be no 
 room for remorse for what we have done, or forethought for what we 
 should do. But then they maintain, also, that this feeling is delusive ; 
 thit it maybe demonstrated to be a mistake; and that, consequent!-. 
 
I/O Analogy of Religion. [P.art T. 
 
 here is a conflict between the rational and the moral ],.rinciples of our 
 nature. Such a scheme is essentially skeptical, representing the im- 
 mediate judgments of the mind as contradictory of each other. It 
 represents the mind as pronouncing certain volitions, when 7iewed 
 under a speculative aspect, to fall under the law of cause and effect ; 
 and yet, pronouncing the same volitions, when viewed under a prac • 
 tical aspect, to be exempt from it. 
 
 Now, upon such a scheme, as there is a direct conflict between the 
 independent decisions of our own consciousness, it seems clear ihat 
 we have no more right to pronounce the moral judgment delusive 
 than the rational. Each would be brought equally into doubt if this 
 statement were correct. But, even upon this statement the obliga- 
 tions of morality will remain. I know not, suppose, which judgment 
 is true and which delusive ; but still it is not, and cannot be a matter 
 of indifferencd* which of the two I practically follow ; because, if I 
 act in disregard of the moral consciousness, I am, by the very hy- 
 pothesis, self-condemned. The moral faculty is the practical faculty ; 
 and, when the question is, What is to be done ? I am in the sphere of 
 action, not of speculation. Reason, in her province, may refuse to i^eg- 
 ister the decree, but she does not. for she cannot, superinduce a con- 
 trar)' practical obligation. 
 
 The doctrine of necessity, in its religious form, takes this expres- 
 sion : — that moral acts of the will are determined by their motives 
 (meaning by motive all that is the result of temper, organization, ed- 
 ucation, and outward circumstances) as certainly as physical conse- 
 quences are by their antecedents ; but that the acts which proceed 
 from certain classes of motives are approved or condemned by the 
 moral faculty, as being the results of certain motives, without the im- 
 plied intervention of any such consciousness of freedom as the main* 
 tainers of the liberty of the will suppose. — F.J 
 
Chap. VII.] A Scheme Incomprehensible. 171 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 OF THE GOVERNMENT OF GOD, CONSIDERED AS A 
 SCHEME OR CONSTITUTION, IMPERFECTLY COMPRE- 
 HENDED. 
 
 THOUGH it be, as it cannot but be, acknowledged, 
 that the analogy of nature gives a strong credibility 
 to the o;eneral doctrine of religion, and to 
 
 * . . ... The incompre- 
 
 the several particular things contained in it, honsibiutyofthe 
 
 . ■" - - divine govern- 
 
 considered as so many matters or fact; and mont an answer 
 
 ,., . , . , , . Ti •!• to objections. 
 
 likewise that it shows this credibility not to 
 be destroyed by any notions of necessity; yet still, ob- 
 jections may be insisted upon against the wisdom, equity, 
 and goodness of the divine government, implied in the 
 notion of religion, and against the method by which this 
 government is conducted, to which objections analogy 
 can be no direct answer.* For the credibility, or the 
 certain truth, of a matter of fact, does not immediately 
 
 * [It is obvious that the direct way of showing a certain course of 
 conduct to be wise or good is to show the precise relations which 
 render it so ; the goodness of the ends and the suitability of the 
 means. 
 
 The indirect way is to show that there may be such relations, 
 though we do not see, them, coupled with the proof that such a cour e 
 of conduct is the conduct of one whom we have good reason, on oth', r 
 grounds, to believe wise and good. 
 
 Indeed, there have not been wanting persons who have chosen lu 
 represent Butler's argument, throughout this analogy, as tending to 
 overthrow the whole proof of God's attributes of justice, wisdom, and 
 goodness, by establishing the matter of fact of our being under a 
 government no way consistent with such attributes. The object of 
 the present chapter is to obviate such a misrepresentation. Compare 
 throughout, part ii, chap. viii.-^F.] 
 
172 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 prove any thing concerning the wisdom or goodness of 
 it ; and analogy can do no more, immediately or direct- 
 ly, than show such and such things to be true or credible 
 considered only as matters of fact. But still, if, upon 
 supposition of a moral constitution of nature and a moral 
 government over it, analogy suggests and makes it cred- 
 ible that this government must be a scheme, system, or 
 constitution of government, as distinguished from a num- 
 ber of single unconnected acts of distributive justice 
 and goodness ; and likewise that it must be a scheme so 
 imperfectly comprehended, and of such a sort in other 
 respects, as to afford a direct general answer to all objec- 
 tions against the justice and goodness of it ; then analogy 
 is, remotely, of great service in answering those objec- 
 tions, both by suggesting the answer and showing it to 
 be a credible one. 
 
 2. Now this, upon inquiry, will be found to be the case. 
 Yox^Jirst, Upon supposition that God exer- 
 cises a moral government over the world, the 
 analogy of his natural government suggests, and makes it 
 credible, that his moral government must be a scheme 
 quite beyond our comprehension; and this affords a 
 general answer to all objections against the justice and 
 goodness of it. And, secondly^ A more distinct observa- 
 tion of some particular things contained in God's 
 scheme of natural government, the like things being 
 supposed, by analogy, to be contained in his moral gov- 
 ernment, will further show how little weight is to bo 
 laid upon these objections. 
 
 I. Upon supposition that God exercises a moral gov- 
 ernment over the world, the analogy of his natural gov- 
 Namrai gov- crnment suggests and makes it credible that 
 SmpreLSsibie' his moral government must be a scheme 
 scheme. quite bcyoud our comprehension : and this 
 
 affords a general answer to all objections against the 
 justice and goodness of it. It is most obvious, analogy 
 
Chap. VII.] A Scheme Incomprehensible. 173 
 
 renders it highly credible, that upon supposition of a 
 moral government it must be a scheme — for the world, 
 and the whole natural government of it, appears to be so — 
 to be a scheme, system, or constitution, whose parts cor- 
 respond to each other and to a whole, as really as any 
 work of art, or as any particular model of a civil consti • 
 tution and government. In this great scheme of the.- 
 natural world, individuals have various peculiar relations 
 to other individuals of their own species. And whole 
 species are, we find, variously related to other species 
 upon this earth. Nor do we know how much further 
 these kinds of relations may extend. And as there is 
 not any action, or natural event, which we are acquaint- 
 ed with, so single and unconnected as not to have a 
 respect to some other actions and events; so possibly 
 each of them, when it has not an immediate, may yet 
 have a remote, natural relation to other actions and 
 events, much beyond the compass of this present world. 
 There seems, indeed, nothing, from whence we can so 
 much as make a conjecture, whether all creatures, ac- 
 tions, and events, throughout the whole of nature, have 
 relations to each other. But, as it is obvious that all 
 events have future unknown consequences, so, if we 
 trace any, as far as we can go, into what is connected 
 with it, we shall find that if such event were not con- 
 nected with somewhat further in nature unknown to us, 
 somewhat both past and present, such event could not 
 possibly have been at all. Nor can we give the whole 
 account of any one thing whatever ; of all its causes, 
 ends, and necessary adjuncts; those adjuncts, I mean, 
 without which it could not have been. By this most 
 astonishing connection — these reciprocal corresponden- 
 cies and mutual relations — every thing which we see in 
 the course of nature is actually brought about. And 
 tilings, seemingly the most insignificant imaginable, nre 
 perpetually obser\ed to be necessary conditions to otlier 
 
174 
 
 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 things of the greatest importance ; so that any one thing 
 whatever may, for aught we know to the contrary, be a 
 necessary condition to any other. 
 
 The natural world then, and natural government of it, 
 being such an incomprehensible scheme, — so incompre- 
 hensible that a man must really in the literal sense 
 know nothing at all> who is not sensible of his ignc ranee 
 in it, — this immediately suggests, and strongly shows the 
 credibility, that the moral world and government of it 
 may be so too.* Indeed, the natural and moral consti- 
 tution and government of the world are so connected as 
 to make up together but one scheme : and it is highly 
 probable that the first is formed and carried on merely 
 in subserviency to the latter, as the vegetable world is 
 for the animal, and organized bodies for minds. But 
 the thing intended here is, without inquiring how far the 
 administration of the natural world is subordinate to 
 that of the moral, only to observe the credibility, that 
 one should be analogous, or similar to, the other: that 
 therefore every act of divine justice and goodness may 
 be supposed to look much beyond itself and its imme- 
 diate object; may have some reference to other parts 
 
 * [Maimonides makes use of the following similitude : " Suppose 
 one of good understanding, whose mother had died soon after he was 
 born, to be brought up on an island, where he saw no human being 
 but his father, nor the female of any beast. This person when grown 
 up inquires how men are produced. He is told that they are bred in 
 the womb of one of the same species, and that while in the womb- 
 we are very small and there move and are nourished. The young 
 man inquires. whether, when thus in the womb, we did not eat and 
 drink and breathe, as we now do, and is answered, No. Then he 
 denies it and offers demonstration that it could not be so, ' For,' says he, 
 ' if either of us cease to breathe our life is gone ; and how could >■ ; have 
 lived close shut up in a womb for months ? So if we cease to eat and 
 drink we die, and how could the child live so for months?' And thii? 
 he satisfies himself that it is impossible that man should come inlu 
 existence in such a manner." — Stillingfleet's Origines Sacra?, p 434, 
 London ; 1663. Fitzgerald's ed., p. 181.] 
 
Chap. VII.] A Scheme Incomprehensible. 175 
 
 of God's moral administration, and to a general moral 
 plan ; and tliat every circumstance of this his moral 
 government may be adjusted beforehand with a view to 
 the whole of it. Thus for example : the determined 
 length of time, and the degrees and ways in which \ irtue 
 is to remain in a state of warfare and discipline, and in 
 which wickedness is permitted to have its progress ; the 
 times appointed for the execution of justice : the ap- 
 pointed instruments of it ; the kinds of rewards and 
 punishments, and the manners of their distribution; all 
 particular instances of divine justice and goodness, and 
 every circumstance of them, may have such respects to 
 each other as to make up altogether a whole, connected 
 and related in all its parts ; a scheme, or system, which 
 is as properly one as the natural world is, and of the like 
 kind. And supposing this to be the case, it is most 
 evident that we are not competent judges of this scheme 
 from the small parts of it which come within our view 
 in the present life, and therefore no objections aj^ainst 
 any of these parts can be insisted upon by reasonable 
 men.* 
 
 z. Tliis our ignorance, and the conse- ^ . 
 
 ^ ° ' Our Ignorance 
 
 quences here drawn from it, are universally an answer to ob- 
 
 ^ ■' jections. 
 
 acknowledged upon other occasions; and 
 
 * [Let us imagine a person to be taken to view some great histor- 
 ical painting, before which hangs a thick curtain. The attendant 
 raises the curtain a few inches. Can the spectator from the unmean- 
 ing strip of foreground derive any conception of the figures yet con- 
 cealed? Much less is he able to criticise their proportions, or beauty, 
 or perspective, or even the design of the artist. The small fragment 
 of a tree, or a flower, or animal, or building may seem quite unmean, 
 iMg, and even ugly, though the whole would present beauty, fit- 
 ness, or grandeur. Now the portion of God's dominions within 
 our survey is as utterly insignificant, compared to the universe and 
 its interminable duration, as an atom compared to a planc^ oi i 
 man's age to eternity. — Malcom.] 
 
 [Chalmers has an able note on this subject, using a lifferent illus- 
 tration taken from Leibnitz.] 
 
1/6 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 though scarce denied, yet are universally forgot when 
 persons come to argue against religion. And it is not, 
 perhaps, easy even for the most reasonable men always 
 to bear in mind the degree of our ignorance, and make 
 due allowances for it. Upon these accounts it may not 
 be useless to go on a little further, in order to showmon; 
 distinctly how just an answer our ignorance is to objec- 
 tions against the scheme of providence. Suppose, then^ 
 a person boldly to assert that the things 
 
 Illustrations. . . . . . . . 
 
 complained of — the origin and continuance 
 of evil — might easily have been prevented by repeated 
 interpositions, (pages 178, 179;) interpositions so guard- 
 ed and circumstanced as would preclude all mischief 
 arising from them ; or, if this were impracticable, that a 
 scheme of government is itself an imperfection; since 
 more good might have been produced without any 
 scheme, system, or constitution at all, by continued 
 single unrelated acts of distributive justice and good- 
 ness ; because these would have occasioned no irregu- 
 larities. And further than this, it is presumed, the ob- 
 jections will not be carried. Yet the answer is obvious ; 
 that were these assertions true, still the observations 
 above, concerning our ignorance in the scheme of divine 
 government, and the consequence drawn from it, would 
 hold in great measure, enough to vindicate religion 
 against all objections from the disorders of the present 
 state. Were these assertions true, yet the government 
 of the world might be just and good notwithstanding; 
 for at the most they would infer nothing more than that 
 it might have been better. But, indeed, they are mere 
 arbitrary assertions ; no man being sufficiently acquaint- 
 ed with the possibilities of things to bring any proof of 
 them to the lowest degree of probability. For however 
 possible what is asserted may seem, yet many Instances 
 may be alleged, in things much less out of our reach, of 
 suppositions absolutely impossible, and reducible to the 
 
Chap. VII.] A Scheme Incomprehensible. 177 
 
 most palpable self-contradictions, which not every one 
 by any means would perceive to be such, nor perhaps 
 any one at first sight suspect. 
 
 From these things it is easy to see distinctly how our 
 ignorance, as it is the common, is really a satisfactory 
 answer to all objections against the justice and goodness 
 of providence. If a man contemplating any one provi- 
 dential dispensation which had no relation to any others, 
 1 should object that he discerned in it a disregard to jus- 
 Itice, or a deficiency of goodness, nothing would be less 
 an answer to such objection than our ignorance in other 
 'parts of providence, or in the possibilities of things no 
 way related to what he was contemplating. But when 
 we know not but the parts objected against may be 
 relative to other parts unknown to us, and when we are 
 unacquainted with what is, in the nature of the thing, 
 practicable in the case before us, then our ignorance is 
 a satisfactory answer ; because some unknown relation, 
 or some unknown impossibility, may render what is ob- 
 jected against just and good ; nay, good in the highest 
 practical degree. 
 
 4. II. And how little weight is to be laid upon such 
 objections will further appear, by a more distinct obser- 
 vation of some particular things contained Argument from 
 in the natural government of God, the like epecki things. 
 to which may be supposed, from analogy, to be contained 
 in his moral government. 
 
 First. As in the scheme of the natural world no end 
 appears to be accomplished without means, so we find 
 that means very undesirable often conduce Means essential 
 
 ■^ bring about ends in such a measure desir- 
 able, as greatly to overbalance the disagreeableness of 
 the means. And in cases where such means are con- 
 ducive to such ends, it is not reason, out experience, 
 which shows us that they are thus conducive. Experi- 
 ence aiso shows many means to be conducive and nec- 
 1-2 
 
ijH Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 essary to accomplish ends, which means, before experi- 
 ence, we should have thought would have had even a 
 contrary tendency. Now from these observations relat- 
 ing to the natural scheme of the world, the4Tioral being 
 supposed analogous to it, arises a great credibility that 
 the putting our misery in each other's power to the de- 
 gree it is, and making men liable to vice to the degree 
 we are, and in general, that those things which are ob- 
 jected against the moral scheme of providence may be, 
 upon the whole, friendly and assistant to virtue, and pro- 
 ductive of an overbalance of happiness ; that is, the 
 things objected against may be means by which an over- 
 balance of good will, in the end, be found produced. 
 And from the same observations it appears to be no pre- 
 sumption against this that we do not, if indeed we do 
 not, see those means to have any such tendency, or that 
 they seem to us to have a contrary one. Thus those 
 things which we call irregularities may not be so at all, 
 because they may be means of accomplishing wise and 
 good ends more considerable. And it may be added, 
 as above, that they may also be the only means by 
 which these wise and good ends are capable of being 
 accomplished. 
 
 After these observations it may be proper to add, in 
 
 order to obviate an absurd and wicked conclusion from 
 
 any of them, that thousjh the constitution of 
 
 Bin and mis- ^ ° , , r 
 
 cry not in them- our nature, from whence we are capabJe or 
 
 eelves benelicial. , . . , , ,, 
 
 vice and misery, may, as it unaoubtealy 
 does, contribute to the perfection and happiness of the 
 world; and though the actual permission of evil may 
 be beneficial to it, (that is, it would have been more 
 mischievous, not that a wicked person had himself ab- 
 stained from his own wickedness, but that any one had 
 forcibly prevented it, than that it was permitted,) yer 
 notwithstanding, it might have been much better for tlie 
 ♦vorld if this very evil had never been done. Nav, it is 
 
Chap. VII. 1 A Scheme Incomprehensible. 179 
 
 most clearly conceivable that the very commission of 
 wickedness may be beneficial to the world, and yet tliat 
 it would be infinitely more beneficial for men to refrain 
 from it. For thus, in the wise and good constitution of 
 the natural world, there are disorders which bring their 
 own cures; diseases, which are themselves remedies. 
 Many a man would have died, had it not been for the 
 gout or a fever ; yet it would be thought madness to 
 assert, that sickness is a better or more perfect state 
 than health; though the like, with regard to the moral 
 world, has been asserted. But, 
 
 5. Secondly, The natural government of the world is 
 carried on by general laws. For this there ^, 
 
 ■' ° ^ Natural jrovern- 
 
 may be wise and good reasons : the wisest nicnt and gen- 
 
 eral laws. 
 
 and best, for aught we know to the contrary. 
 And that there are such reasons, is suggested to our 
 thoughts by the analogy of nature ; by our being made 
 to experience good ends to be accomplished, as indeed 
 all the good which we enjoy is accomplished, by this 
 means, that the laws by which the world is governed are 
 general. For we have scarce any kind of enjoyments 
 but what we are, in some way or other, instrumental in 
 procuring ourselves, by acting in a manner which we 
 foresee likely to procure them : now this foresight could 
 not be at all, were not the government of the world car- 
 ried on by general laws. And though, for aught we 
 know to the contrary, every single case may be at length 
 found to have been provided for even by these ; yet to 
 prevent all irregularities, or remedy them as they arise, 
 by the wisest and best general laws, may be impossible 
 in the nature of things, as we see it is absolutely impos- 
 sible in civil government. 
 
 But then we are ready to think that the constitution 
 of nature remaining as it is, and the course special inter- 
 of things being permitted to go on, in other Sie'^"'i paTiliJ 
 respects, as it does, there might be interpo- ^'''"' *'"""'■ 
 
»8o Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 sitions to prevent irregularities, though they cciuld not 
 have been prevented or remedied by any general laws. 
 And there would indeed be reason to wish — which, by 
 the way, is very different from a right to claim — that all 
 irregularities were prevented or remedied by present 
 interpositions, if these interpositions would have no 
 other effect than this. But it is plain they would have 
 some visible and immediate bad effects ; for instance, 
 they would encourage idleness and negligence, and they 
 would render doubtful the natural rule of life, which is 
 ascertained by this very thing, that the course of the 
 world is carried on by general laws. And further, it is 
 certain they would have distant effects, and very great 
 ones, too, by means of the wonderful connections be- 
 fore-mentioned. (Page 173, etc.) So that we cannot so 
 much as guess what would be the whole result of the 
 interpositions desired. It may be said, any bad result 
 might be prevented by further interpositions, whenever 
 there was occasion for them ; but this again is talking 
 quite at random, and in the dark. (Pages 175, 176.) 
 Upon the whole, then, we see wise reasons why the 
 course of the world should be carried on by general 
 laws, and good ends accomplished by this means; and, 
 for aught we know, there may be the wisest reasons foi 
 it, and the best ends accomplished by it. We have no 
 ground to believe that all irregularities could be rem- 
 edied as they arise, or could have been precluded by 
 general laws. We find that interpositions would pro- 
 duce evil and prevent good ; and for aught we know, they 
 would produce greater evil than they would prevent, and 
 prevent greater good than they would produce. And 'f 
 this be the case, then the not interposing is so far from 
 being a ground of complaint, that it is an instance of 
 goodness. This is intelligible and sufficient ; and going 
 further seems beyond the utmost reach of our faculties. 
 ('). But it may be said, "that after all, these sup,i)f)sed 
 
Chap VII.] A Scheme Incomprehensible. i8i 
 
 imposi;ibilities and relations are what we are unacquaint- 
 ed with; and we must judge of religion, as our ignorance 
 of other things, by what we do know, and datetSepSoi 
 look upon the rest as nothing; or however, r*^''^'*"- 
 that the answers here given to what is objected against 
 religion, may equally be made use of to invalidate the 
 proof of it, since their stress lies so very much upon our 
 ignoiance." But, 
 
 7. Firsts Though total ignorance, in any matter, does 
 indeed equally destroy, or rather preclude, all proof 
 concerning it and objections against it, yet partial ig- 
 norance does not. For we may in any degree be con- 
 vinced that a person is of such a character, and conse- 
 quently will pursue such ends, though we are greatly 
 ignorant what is the proper way of acting in order the 
 most effectually to obtain those ends ; and in this case, 
 objections against his manner of acting, as seemingly 
 not conducive to obtain them, might be answered by our 
 ignorance, though the proof that such ends were intend- 
 ed might not at all be invalidated by it.* Thus the 
 proof of religion is a proof of the moral character of 
 
 * [The concluding observations of this chapter are all-important 
 for the vindication of Butler's whole argument. They show most 
 sa isfactorilyhowour ignorance may invalidate the objections against, 
 and yet not invalidate the proof of, the thing. The essence of the 
 reasoning here lies in the distinction between our knowledge of God's 
 will and our knowledge of his ways. We have positive proof of h's 
 moral character, in vii-tue of which he wills both the righteuusucst 
 and the happiness of his creatures ; and yet may be utterly in the 
 dark as to the most effectual ways or methods of procedure by which 
 these objects can be most fully accomplished. We may kn ;w the 
 enfl, and yet not know the best means of bringing it abcmt. A total 
 ignorance would place both the objections and the proof alike beyond 
 our rea:h, but a partial ignorance may not. God's wisdom may be 
 learned by its vestiges within the limits of a mere handbreadth, as in 
 the construction of an eye ; yet, after having learned this, we may 
 fail in oui judgment of the subserviency of things that go out and far 
 from view, whether widely in space or distantly in time. And so 
 
f82 Analogy of Rlligiox. [Part I. 
 
 God, and consequently, that his government is moral, 
 and that every one upon the whole shall receive accord- 
 ing to his deserts; a proof that this is the v.'esigned end 
 of his government. But we are not competent judgt^s 
 what is the proper way of acting, in order the most ef- 
 fectually to accomplish this end. (Pages 40, 41.) There- 
 fore our ignorance is an answer to objections against the 
 conduct of providence in permitting irregulaiities, as 
 seeming contradictory to this end. Now,, since it is so 
 obvious that our ignorance may be a satisfactory answer 
 to objections against a thing, and yet not affect the proof 
 of it ; till it can be shown, it is frivolous to assert, that 
 our ignorance invalidates the proof of religion, as it does 
 the objections against it. 
 
 8. Secondly, Suppose unknown impossibilities and un- 
 known relations might justly be urged to invalidate the. 
 proof of religion, as well as to answer objections against 
 it, and that in consequence of this the proof of it were 
 doubtful, yet still, let the assertion be despised or let it 
 be ridiculed, it is undeniably true that moral obligations 
 would remain certain, though it were not certain what 
 would, upon the whole, be the consequences of observ- 
 ing or violating them. For these obligations arise im- 
 mediately and necessarily from the judgment of our own 
 mind, unless perverted, which we cannot violate with- 
 out being self-condemned. And they would be certain, 
 too, from considerations of interest. For though it were 
 doubtful what will be the future consequences of virtue 
 and vice, yet it is, however, credible that they may have 
 those consequences which religion teaches us they will; 
 and this credibility is a certain * obligation, in point of 
 
 within the homestead of one's own conscience may we read the ksson 
 of a righteous God, and yet be wholly unable to pronounce en the 
 tendency or effect of those measures which enter into the policy of his 
 universal government. — Chalmers.] 
 ♦ Page 35, and part ii, chap. vi. 
 
Chap. VII. J A Scheme Incomprehensible. 183 
 
 prudence, to abstain from all wickedness, and to live in 
 the conscientious practice of all that is good. But, 
 
 9. Thirdly, The answers above given to the objec- 
 tions against religion cannot equally be made use of to 
 invalidate the proof of it. For upon the supposition 
 that God exercises a moral government over the world, 
 analogy does most strongly lead us to conclude that this 
 moral government must be a scheme, or constitution, 
 beyond our comprehension. And a thousand particular 
 analogies show us, that parts of such a scheme, from 
 their relation to other parts, may conduce to accomplish 
 ends which we should have thought they had no ten- 
 dency at all to accomplish ; nay, ends which, before ex- 
 perience, we should have thought such parts were contra- 
 dictory to, and had a tendency to prevent. And there- 
 fore all these analogies show, that the way of arguing 
 made use of in objecting against religion is delusive; be- 
 cause they show it is not at all incredible that, could we 
 comprehend the whole, we should find the permission of 
 the disorders objected against to be consist«3nt with 
 justice and goodness, and even to be instances of them. 
 Now this is not applicable to the proof of religion, as 
 it is to the objections against it;* and therefore cannot 
 invalidate that proof, as it does these objections. 
 
 10. Lastly, From the observations now made, it is easy 
 to see that the answers above given to the objections 
 against providence, though in a general way of speaking 
 they may be said to be taken from our ignorance, yet 
 are by no means taken merely from that, but from some- 
 what which analogy shows us concerning it. For anal- 
 ogy shows us positively that our ignorance in the possi- 
 bilities of things, and the various relations in nature, ren- 
 ders us incompetent judges, and leads us to false conclu- 
 sions in cases similar to this, in which we pretend to judge 
 and to object. So that the things above insisted upon 
 
 * Sermons at the Rolls, page 312, 2d edit. 
 
184 Analogy of Religion. LPakt T.. 
 
 are not mere suppositions of unknown impossibilities and 
 relations; but they are suggested to our thoughts, and 
 even forced upon the observation of serious men, and 
 rendered credible, too, by the analogy of nature. And 
 therefore to take these things into the account is to 
 judge by experience and what we do know; and it is 
 not judging so to take no notice of them. 
 
 T 
 
 CONCLUSION. 
 
 HE observations of the last chapter lead us to con- 
 sider this little scene of human life, in which we 
 are so busily engaged, as having a reference, 
 
 Recapitulation. .r & o » & > 
 
 of some sort or other, to a much larger plan 
 of things. Whether we are any way related to the more 
 distant parts of the boundless universe into which we 
 are brought, is altogether uncertain. But it is evident 
 that the course of things which comes within our view 
 is connected with somewhat past, present, and future, 
 beyond it. (Pages 172, 173.) So that we are placed, as 
 one may speak, in the middle of a scheme, not a fixed, 
 but a progressive one, every way incomprehensible ; in- 
 pomprehensible, in a manner, equally with respect to 
 what has been, what now is, and what shall be hereafter. 
 And this scheme cannot but contain in it somewhat as 
 wonderful, and as much beyond our thought and con- 
 ception, (part ii, chap, ii,) as any thing in that of relig- 
 ion. For will any man in his senses say, that it is less 
 difficult to conceive how the world came to be, and to 
 continue as it is, without than with an intelligent author 
 and governor of it.? or, admitting an intelligent govern- 
 or of it, that there is some other rule of government 
 more natural, and of easier conception, than that which 
 we call moral.'* Indeed, without an intelligent author 
 
CUAV. VIIJ CONCLJSION 1 85 
 
 ail a governor of nature no account at all can be given 
 how this universe, or the part of it particularly in A'hich 
 we are concerned, came t'o be, and the course of it to 
 be carried on as it is; nor any of its general end and 
 design without a moral governor of it. That there is an 
 intelligent author of nature, and natural governor of the 
 world, is a principle gone upon in the foregoing treatise, 
 as proved, and generally known and confessed to be 
 proved. And the very notion of an intelligent author 
 of nature, proved by particular final causes, implies a 
 will and a character. (Page 160.) 
 
 Now as our whole nature, the nature which he has 
 given us, leads us to conclude his will and character to be 
 moral, just, and good; so we can scarce in imagination 
 conceive what it can be otherwise. However, in conse- 
 quence of this his will and character, whatever it be, he 
 formed the universe as it is, and carries on the course 
 of it as he does, rather than in any other manner ; and 
 has assigned to us, and to all living creatures, a part and 
 a lot in it. Irrational creatures act this their part, and 
 enjoy and undergo the pleasures and the pains allotted 
 them, without any reflection. But one would think it 
 impossible that creatures endued with reason could 
 avoid reflecting sometimes upon all this ; reflecting, if 
 not from whence we came, yet at least whither we are 
 going, and what the mysterious scheme in the midst of 
 which we find ourselves will at length come out and pro- 
 duce ; a scheme in which it is certain we are highly in- 
 terested, and in which we may be interested even beyond 
 conception. 
 
 For many things prove it palpably absurd to conclude 
 that we shall cease to be at death. Particular analogies 
 do most sensibly show us, that there is nothing to be 
 thought strange in our being to exist in another state of 
 life. And that we are now living beings, affords a strong 
 probabilitv that we shall ranfi'm/e so ; unless there he 
 
1 86 Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 some positive ground, and there is none from reason oi 
 analogy, to think ,death will destroy us. Were a persua- 
 sion of this kind ever so well grounded, there would 
 surely be little reason to take pleasure in it. But indeed, 
 it can have no other ground than some such imagina- 
 tion, as that of our gross bodies being ourselves; which 
 is contrary to experience. Experience, too, most clejir- 
 ly shows us the folly of concluding from the body and 
 the living agent affecting each other mutually, that the 
 dissolution of the former is the destruction of the latter. 
 And there are remarkable instances of their not affect- 
 ing each other, which lead us to a contrary conclusion. 
 The supposition, then, which in all reason we are to go 
 upon is, that our living nature will continue after death. 
 And it is infinitely unreasonable, to form an institution 
 of life, or to act upon any other supposition. 
 
 Now all expectation of immortality, whether more or 
 less certain, opens an unbounded prospect to our hopes 
 and our fears; since we see the constitution of nature 
 is such as to admit of misery as well as to be productive 
 of happiness, and experience ourselves to partake of 
 both in some degree ; and since we cannot but know 
 what higher degrees of both we are capable of. And 
 there is no presumption against believing further, that 
 our future interest depends upon our present behavior; 
 for we see our present interest doth; and that the hap- 
 piness and misery which are naturally annexed to our 
 actions, very frequently do not follow till long after the 
 actions are done to which they are respectively annexed. 
 So that were speculation to leave us uncertain, whether 
 it were likely that the author of nature, in giving happi- 
 ness and misery to his creatures, hath- regard to their 
 actions or not ; yet, since we find by experience that he 
 hath such regard, the whole sense of things which he 
 has given us plainly leads us at once, and without any 
 elaborate inquiries, to think that it may, indeed must. 
 
Chap. VI 1.3 Conclusion. 187 
 
 be to good actions chiefly that he hath annexed happi- 
 tiess, and to bad actions misery ; or that he will, upon 
 the whole, reward those who do well and punish those 
 who do evil. 
 
 To confirm this from the constitution of the world, it 
 has been observed, that some sort of moral government 
 is necessarily implied in that natural government of God 
 which v/e experience ourselves under ; that good and 
 bad actions, at present, are naturally rewarded and pun- 
 ished, not only as beneficial and mischievous to society, 
 but also as virtuous and vicious; and that there is, in 
 the very nature of the thing, a tendency to their being 
 rewarded and punished in a much higher degree than 
 they are at present. And though this higher degree of 
 distributive justice, which nature thus points out and 
 leads toward, is prevented for a time from taking place, 
 it is by obstacles which the state of this world unhappi- 
 ly throws in its way, and which therefore are in their 
 nature temporary. Now as these things, in the natural 
 conduct of Providence, are observable on the side of 
 virtue, so there is nothing to be set against them on the 
 side of vice. A moral scheme of government, then, is 
 visibly established, and in some degree carried into ex- 
 ecution; and this, together with the essential tendencies 
 of virtue and vice duly considered, naturally raise in us 
 an apprehension that it will be carried on further toward 
 perfection in a future state, and that every one shall 
 there receive according to his deserts. 
 
 And if this be so, then our future and general interest, 
 under the moral government of God, is apj)ointed to 
 depend upon our behavior, notwithstanding the difficul- 
 ty which this may occasion of securing it, and the dan- 
 ger of losing it ; just in the same manner as our temporal 
 interest, under his natural government, is appointed to 
 depend upon our behavior, notwithstanding the like dif- 
 ficulty and danger. For, from our original constitutioi., 
 
1 88 Analogy of Religion. I Part I. 
 
 and that of the world which we inhabit, we are naturally 
 trusted with ourselves, with our own conduct and our 
 own interest. And from the same constitution of nature, 
 especially joined with that course of things which is ow- 
 ing to men, we have temptations to be unfaithful in this 
 trust, to forfeit this interest, to neglect it, and run oui- 
 selves into misery and ruin. From these temptations 
 arise the difficulties of behaving so as to secure our 
 temporal interest, and the hazard of behaving so as to 
 miscarry in it. There is therefore nothing incredible in 
 supposing there may be the like difficulty and hazard 
 with regard to that chief and final good which religion 
 lays before us. Indeed the whole account, how it came 
 to pass that we were placed in such a condition as this, 
 must be beyond our comprehension. But it is in part 
 accounted for by what religion teaches us, that the char- 
 acter of virtue and piety must be a necessary qualifica- 
 tion for a future state of security and happiness, under 
 the moral government of God ; in like manner, as some 
 certain qualifications or other are necessary for every par- 
 ticular condition of life, under his natural government; 
 and that the present state was intended to be a school 
 of discipline, for improving in ourselves that character. 
 Now this intention of nature is rendered highly credible 
 by observing, that we are plainly made for improve- 
 ment of all kinds; that it is a general appointment of 
 providence that we cultivate practical principles, and 
 form within ourselves habits of action, in order t( be- 
 come fit for what we were wholly unfit for before ; that 
 in particular, childhood and youth is naturally appointed 
 to be a state of discipline for mature age, and that the 
 present world is peculiarly fitted for a state of moral 
 discipline. And whereas objections are urged against 
 the whole notion of moral government and a probation- 
 state, from the opinion of necessity, it has been shown 
 that God has given us the evidence, as it were, of expe- 
 
Chap. VII"; Conclusion. 189 
 
 rience, that all objections against religion on this head 
 are vain and delusive. He has also, in his natural gov- 
 ernment, suggested an answer to all our short-sighted 
 objections against the equity and goodness of his moral 
 government, and in general he has exemplified to us the 
 latter by the former. 
 
 These things, which, it is to be remembered, are mat 
 teis of fact, ought in all common sense to awaken man- 
 kind, to induce them to consider in earnest their condi- 
 tion, and what they have to do. It is absurd — absurd 
 to the degree of being ridiculous, if the subject were not 
 of so serious a kind — for men to think themselves secure 
 in a vicious life, or even in that immoral thoughtlessness 
 which far the greatest part of them are fallen into. And 
 the credibility of religion, arising from experience and 
 facts here considered, is fully sufficient, in reason, to en- 
 gage them to live in the general practice of all virtue 
 and piety; under the serious apprehension, though it 
 should be mixed with some doubt, (part ii, chap, vi,) of 
 a righteous administration established in nature, and a 
 future judgment in consequence of it; especially when 
 we consider how very questionable it is whether any 
 thing at all can be gained by vice, (page 87 ;) how un- 
 questionably little, as well as precarious, the pleasures 
 and profits of it are at the best; and how soon they 
 must be parted with at the longest. For in the deliber- 
 ations of reason concerning what we are to pursue and 
 what to avoid, as temptations to any thing from mere 
 passion are supposed out of the case; so inducements 
 to vice, from cool expectations of pleasure and interest, 
 so small and uncertain and short, are really so insignifi- 
 cant as, in the view of reason, to be almost nothing in 
 themselves, and in comparison with the importance of 
 religion, they quite disappear and are lost. Mere pas- 
 sion, indeed, may be alleged, though not as a reason, vet 
 as an excuse for a vicious course of lif'j. And ho\v sorry 
 
IQO Analogy of Religion. [Part I. 
 
 an excuse it is will be manifest by observing, that we 
 are placed in a condition in which we are unavoidably 
 inured to govern our passions, by being necessitated to 
 govern them; ard to lay ourselves under the same kind 
 of, restraints, and as great ones, too, from temporal re- 
 gards, as virtue and piety, in the ordinary course of 
 things, require. The plea of ungovernable passion, 
 then, on the side of vice, is the poorest of all things ; for 
 it is no reason, and but a poor excuse. But the proper 
 motives to religion are the proper proofs of it, from our 
 moral nature, from the presages of conscience, and our 
 natural apprehension of God, under the character of a 
 righteous Governor and Judge ; a nature, and con- 
 science, and apprehension given us by him ; and from 
 the confirmation of the dictates of reason, by life a?id 
 iftimortality brought to light by the Gospel ; and the wrath 
 of God revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and 
 unrighteousness of men. 
 
PAIIT II. 
 OF REVEALED RELIGION. 
 
 CHAPTER 1. 
 
 OF THE IMPORTANCE OF CHRISTIANITY. 
 
 SOME persons, upon pretense of the sufficiency (/f 
 the light of nature,* avowedly reject all revelation 
 as, in its very notion, incredible, and what 
 
 . . . . . Eejectersofrov- 
 
 must be fictitious. And, indeed, it is certain elation. Why 
 
 . 11, unreasonable. 
 
 no revelation would have been given, had the 
 light of nature been sufficient in such a sense as to ren- 
 der one not wanting and useless. But no man in serious- 
 ness and simplicity of mind can possibly think it so, who 
 considers the state of religion in the heathen world be- 
 fore revelation, and its present state in those places 
 which have borrowed no light from it, particularly jhe 
 doubtfulness of some of the greatest men concerning 
 things of the utmost importance, as well as the natural 
 inattention and ignorance of mankind in general. It is 
 impossible to say who would have been able to have 
 reasoned out that whole system which we call natural 
 religion, in its genuine simplicity, clear of superstition ; 
 but tl -re is certainly no ground to affirm that the gen. 
 eiality could : if they could, there is no sort of probabil- 
 ity that they would. Admitting there were, they would 
 highly want a standing admonition to remind them of it, 
 
 * [This is the main argument of Tindal's famous book, " Chris- 
 tianity a.s Old as the Creation ; or, the Gospel a Republication of the 
 Law of Nature," first }iut>Iished in 410., London, 1730. — K.] 
 
192 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 and inculcate it upon them.* And further still, were 
 they as much disposed to attend to religion as the bet- 
 ter sort of men are, yet even upon this supposition, there 
 would be various occasions for supernatural instruction 
 and assistance, and the greatest advantages might be 
 afforded by them. So that to say revelation is a thing 
 superfluous, what there was no need of, and what can be 
 of no service, is, I think, to talk quite wildly and at 
 random. t Nor would it be more extravagant to affirm 
 that mankind is so entirely at ease in the present state, 
 and life so completely happy, that it is a contradiction 
 to suppose our condition capable of being in any respect 
 better. 
 
 2. There are other persons, not to be ranked with 
 
 * [See an excellent slatement of the argument here glanced at in 
 Leland's "Advantage and Necessity of the Christian Revelation 
 shown from the State of Religion in the Ancient Heathen World," etc.] 
 
 f [It may be doubted whether Christian apologists are called upon 
 to demonstrate elaborately the necessity of revelation, /r/(?r to the 
 consideration of its truth, as matter of fact. Paley disposes of this 
 whole question in a single sentence, by simply saying, " I deem it 
 unnecessary to prove that mankind stood in need of a revelation, 
 because I have met with no serious person who thinks that even 
 under the Christian revelation, we have too much light, or any degree 
 of assurance which is superfluous." Dr. Chalmers, on this topic, re- 
 marks, " Possessed as we are, of such competent proofs on the credi- 
 bility of this said revelation, are we to suspend the determination of 
 it, till the previous question of its necessity has been settled and set 
 by? Are we to forego the consideration of the evidences which lie 
 patent before us on the field of observation till we take up a matter, 
 not so much, let it be noticed, of palpable fact as of recondite prin- 
 ciple? The necessity of revelation involves in it topics that stand 
 related both to God and to eternity — to the hidden counsels of the 
 One, to the fathomless unknown, and by us, undiscoverable, of the 
 other. The truth of revelation depends on credentials which lie on 
 an open platform, or certain tangible things within the circle of our 
 perceptions, which have been addressed to human eyes, which have 
 been heard by human ears. It is not sound dialectics to suspend the 
 second of these topics on the first of them." — Dr. Crooks.] 
 
Chap. I.] Importance of Christianity. 193 
 
 these, who seem to be getting into a way of neglecting, 
 and as it were overlooking, revelation, as of Those who no,?- 
 small importance provided natural religion to^^natm^r^nf- 
 be kept to. With little regard either to the "^°°- 
 evidence of the former, or to the objections against it, 
 and even upon supposition of its truth, " the only design 
 of it," say they, "must be to establish a belief of the 
 moral system of nature, and to enforce the practice of 
 natural piety and virtue. The belief and practice of 
 these things were, perhaps, much promoted by the first 
 publication of Christianity ; but w^hether they are be- 
 lieved and practiced, upon the evidence and motives of 
 nature or of revelation, is no great matter."* This way 
 of considering revelation, though it is not the same with 
 the former, yet borders nearly upon it, and very much, 
 at length, runs up into it, and requires to be particularly 
 consideried with regard to the persons who seem to be 
 getting into this way. The consideration of it will like- 
 wise further show the extravagance of the former opin- 
 ion, and the truth of the observations in answer to it, 
 just mentioned. And an inquiry into the importance of 
 Christianity cannot be an improper introduction to a 
 treatise concerning the credibility of it. 
 
 * Invenis niultos — propterea nolle fieri Christianos, quia quasi 
 sufficiunt sibi de bona vita sua. Bene vivere opus est, ait. Quid 
 milii prseceptuius est Christus? Ut bene vivam? Jam bene vivo. 
 Quid mihi necessarius est Christus? Nullum homicidium, nullum 
 furtum, nullum rapinam facio, res alienas non concupisco, nullo adul- 
 terio contaminor. Nam inveniatur in vita mea aliquid quod repre- 
 h?ndatur, et qui reprehenderit facial Christianum. — ^z/'^''. in Psal., 
 xxxi. 
 
 You find many who refuse to become Christians because they feel 
 'iufiicient of themselves to lead a new life. We ought to live well, 
 says one. What will Christ teach me — to live well? I do live well: 
 what need have I of Christ ? I commit no murder, no theft no robbery. 
 I covet no man's goods, and am polluted by no adultery. Let some 
 one find in me any thing to censure, and he who can do so may make 
 me a Christian. 
 13 
 
194 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 3. Now if God has given a revelation to mankind, and 
 commanded those things w^hich are commanded in 
 
 ^ , Christianity, it is evident at first sight tha* 
 
 Obedience not . . . . . " 
 
 an indifferent it cannot m anvwise be an mdifferent mat 
 
 matter. .. . , 
 
 ter whether we obey or disobey those com 
 mands ; unless we are certainly assured that we know 
 all the reasons for them, and that all those reasons are 
 now ceased, with regard to mankind in general, or to 
 ourselves in particular. And it is absolutely impossible 
 we can be assured of this ; for our ignorance of these 
 reasons proves nothing in the case, since the whole 
 analogy of nature shows, what is indeed in itself evident, 
 that there may be infinite reasons for things with which 
 we are not acquainted. 
 
 But the importance of Christianity will more distinct- 
 ly appear by considering it more distinctly : first, as a 
 republication and external institution of naturalbr essen- 
 tial religion, adapted to the present circumstances of 
 mankind, and intended to promote natural piety and 
 virtue ; and secondly, as containing an account of a dis- 
 pensation of things not discoverable by reason, in con- 
 sequence of which several distinct precepts are enjoined 
 us. For though natural religion is the foundation and 
 principal part of Christianity, it is not in any sense the 
 whole of it. 
 
 4. I. Christ ianity is a republication of natural religion. 
 Christianity im- It instructs mankind in the moral system of 
 pubUcation* '^of ^^e world : that it is the work of an infinite- 
 natural religion. |y pej-fect Being, and under his government ; 
 that virtue is his law; and that he will finally judge 
 mankind in righteousness, and render to all according 
 to their works, in a future state. And which is very 
 material, it teaches natural religion in its genuine sim- 
 plicity, free from those superstitions with which it was 
 totally corrupted, and under which it was in a manner 
 lost. . 
 
Chap. I.j Importance of Christianity. 195 
 
 Revelation is further an authoritative publication of 
 natural religion, and so affords the evidence of testimony 
 for the truth of it. Indeed, the miracles ^, ^ , , 
 
 ' _ Whatmfracles 
 
 and prophecies recorded in Scripture were and prophecy 
 
 ... prove. 
 
 intended to prove a particular dispensation 
 of providence — the redemption of the world by the 
 Messiah ; but this does not hinder but that they may 
 also prove God's general providence over the world as 
 our moral governor and judge. And they evidently do 
 prove it, because this character of the author of nature 
 is necessarily connected with, and implied in, that par- 
 ticular revealed dispensation of things : it is likewise 
 continually taught expressly, and insisted upon by those 
 persons who wrought the miracles and delivered the 
 prophecies. So that, indeed, natural religion seems as 
 much proved by the Scripture revelation as it would 
 have been had the design of revelation been nothing else 
 than to prove it. 
 
 5. But it niay possibly be disputed how far miracles 
 can prove natural religion ; and notable objections may 
 be urged against this proof of it, considered Practical effect 
 as a matter of speculaiion : but considered miracles"^ The 
 as a practical thing there can be none. For ^^^c^^'"' ^tc. 
 suppose a person to teach natural religion to a nation, 
 who had lived in total ignorance or forgetfulness of it, 
 and to declare he was commissioned by God so to do ; 
 suppose him, in proof of his commission, to foretell 
 things future, which no human foresight could have 
 guessed at ; to divide the sea with a word ; feed great 
 multitudes with bread from heaven ; cure all manner of 
 diseases; and raise the dead, even himself, to iif e ; 
 would not this give additional credibility to his teach- 
 ing — a credibility beyond what that of a common man 
 would have, and be an authoritative publication of the 
 law of nature, that is, a new proof of it ? It would be a 
 practical one of the strongest kind, perhaps, which 
 
196 Analogy of Religion. [Part 1 1. 
 
 human creatures are capable of having given them. The 
 law of Moses, then, and the gospel of Christ, are author- 
 itative publications of the religion of nature : they afford 
 a proof of God's general providence, as moral governor 
 of the world, as well as of his particular dispensations 
 of providence toward sinful creatures, revealed in the 
 law and the gospel. As they are the only evidence of the 
 latter, so they are an additional evidence of the former. 
 6. To show this further, let us suppose a man of the 
 greatest and most improved capacity, who had never 
 heard of revelation, convinced upon the 
 
 Further illustra- . . 
 
 Uon of its prac- wholc, notwithstanding the disorders of the 
 
 Ucal ell'ecth. , . , . , , , . . , 
 
 world, that it was under the direction and 
 moral government of an infinitely perfect being, but 
 ready to question whether he were not got beyond the 
 reach of his faculties; suppose him brought, by this sus- 
 picion, into great danger of being carried away by the 
 universal bad example of almost every one around him, 
 who appeared to have no sense, no practical sense at 
 least, of these things; and this, perhaps, would be as 
 advantageous a situation, with regard to religion, as na- 
 ture alone evei placed any man in. What a confirma- 
 tion now must it be to such a person all at once to find, 
 that this moral system of things was revealed to mankind 
 in the name of that infinite Being whom he had, from 
 principles of reason, believed in; and that the publish- 
 ers of the revelation proved their commission from him 
 by making it appear that he had intrusted them with a 
 power of suspending and changing the general laws :f 
 nature. 
 
 Nor must it, by any means, be omitted, for it is a thing 
 of the utmost importance, that life and immortality are 
 eminentlv brought to light by the gospel.* The great 
 
 * [For even though natural religion might teach some efficacy to 
 be in repentance, it could not certainly teach the efficacy of it in tlie 
 Christian sense, that is, its efficacy wholly to cancel the punishment 
 
Chap. 1.1 Importance of Christianity. 197 
 
 doctrines of a future state, the danger of a course of 
 wickedness, and the efficacy of repentance, are not only 
 confirmed in the gospel, but are taught, especially the 
 list is, with a degree of light to which that of nature is 
 lut darkness. 
 
 7. Further: As Christianity served these ends and 
 purposes when it was first published, by the miraculous 
 publication itself; so it was intended to serve the same 
 purposes in future ages by means of the set- Desijrn of tiie 
 
 , -. -MiV^i i4tr ' i- visible Church. 
 
 tlement of a visible Church ; * of a society 
 distinguished from common ones and from the rest of 
 the world by peculiar religious institutions, by an insti- 
 tuted method of instruction, and an instituted form of 
 external religion. Miraculous powers were given to the 
 first preachers of Christianity in order to their introduc- 
 ing it into the world; a visible Church was established, 
 in order to continue it, and carry it on successively 
 throughout all ages. Had Moses and the prophets, 
 Christ and his apostles, only taught, and by miracles 
 proved, religion to their contemporaries, the benefits of 
 their instructions would have reached but to a small 
 part of mankind. Christianity must have been, in a 
 
 of sin, and restore us absolutely to God's favor. And though natural 
 religion might show us much danger in wickedness, it could not show 
 us, certainly, the great danger resulting from our probation being 
 terminated forever by death, and the everlasting punishment which 
 will then ensue. — F.] 
 
 * [In his sermon before the Society for the Propagation of the Gos- 
 pel Butler says : " Christianity was left with Christians to be trans- 
 mitted, in like manner as the religion '^f nature had been left with 
 mankind in general. There was, however, this difference, that by an 
 institution of external religion with a standing ministry for instruc- 
 lon and discipline, it pleased God to unite Christians into visibh 
 Churches, and all along to preserve them over a great part of the 
 world, and thus perpetuate a general publication of the Gospel." But- 
 ler goes on to show that however corrupt the Churches may have be- 
 come they were the repositories of 'he written oracles of God, and 
 along with their errors carried their refutation.] 
 
198 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 great degree, sunk and forgot in a very few ages. To 
 prevent this appears to have been one reason why a vis- 
 ible Church was instituted ; to be like a city upon a hill, 
 a standing memorial to the world, of the duty which we 
 owe our Maker ; to call men continually both by ex- 
 ample and instruction, to attend to it, and by the form 
 of religion ever before their eyes remind them of the 
 reality ; to be the repository of the oracles of God ; to 
 hold up the light of revelation in aid to that of nature, 
 and propagate it throughout all generations to the end 
 of the world — the light of revelation, considered here in 
 no other view, than as designed to enforce natural re- 
 ligion. And in proportion as Christianity is professed 
 and taught in the world, religion, natural or essentia] 
 religion, is thus distinctly and advantageously laid be- 
 fore mankind, and brought again and again to their 
 thoughts as a matter of infinite importance. 
 
 A visible Church has also a further tendency to pro- 
 mote natural relisrion as beinar an instituted 
 
 The Church an ^. ... 
 
 aj^ency for edu- method of education, origmally intended to 
 be of more peculiar advantage to those who 
 M^ould conform to it. For one end of the institution 
 was, that by admonition and reproof, as well as instruc- 
 tion ; by a general regular discipline, and public exer- 
 cises of religion, the body of Christy as the Scri})ture 
 speaks, should be edified, that is, trained up in piety and 
 virtue, for a higher and better state. This settlement, 
 then, appearing thus beneficial ; tending, in the nature 
 of the thing, to answer, and in some degree acttially an- 
 swering, those ends; it is to be remembered that the 
 very notion of it implies positive institutions, for the vis- 
 ibility of the Church consists in them. Take away every 
 thing of this kind, and you lose the very notion itself. 
 So that if the things now mentioned are advantages, the 
 reason and importance of positive institutions in general 
 is most obvious ; since, without them, these advantages 
 
Chap. IJ Importance of Christianity. 199 
 
 could not be secured to the world. And it is mere idle 
 wantonness to insist upon knowing the reasons why such 
 particular ones were fixed upon, rather than others. 
 
 The benefit arising from this supernatural assistance 
 which Christianity affords to natural religion, is what 
 some persons are very slow in apprehending : and yet it 
 is a thing distinct in itself, and a very plain, obvious 
 one. For will any in good earnest really say that the 
 bulk of mankind in the heathen world were in as advan- 
 tageous a situation, with regard to natural religion, as 
 they are now among us : that it was laid before them, 
 and enforced upon them, in a manner as distinct, and as 
 much tending to influence their practice? 
 
 8. The objections against all this, from the perversion 
 of Christianity, and from the supposition of ^,. . , 
 
 -^ _ ' '^ ^ Objection from 
 
 its having had but little good influence, the perversion 
 
 P 111 of Christianity. 
 
 however mnocently they may be proposed, 
 yet cannot be insisted upon as conclusive, upon any prin- 
 ciples but such as lead to downright atheism ; because 
 .the manifestation of the law of nature by reason, which, 
 I upon all principles of theism, must have been from God, 
 / has been perverted and rendered ineffectual in the same 
 manner. It may, indeed, I think, truly be said, that the 
 (good effects of Christianity have not been small ; nor its 
 /supposed ill effects any effects at all of it, properly 
 speaking. Perhaps, too, the things themselves done 
 have been aggravated ; and if not, Christianity hath 
 been often only a pretense ; and the same evils in the main 
 would have been done upon some other pretense. How- 
 ever, great and shocking as the corruptions Natural reii^on 
 and abuses of it have really been, they can- p^''^^^^^'^- 
 not be insisted upon as arguments against it, upon prin- 
 ciples of theism. For one cannot proceed one step in 
 reasoning upon natural religion, any more than upon 
 Christianity, without laying it down as a first principle 
 that the dispensations of Providence are not to be 
 
2()0 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 judged of by their perversions , but by their genuir^ 
 tendencies ; not by what they do actually seem to effect, 
 but by what they would effect if mankind did their part : 
 tliat part which is justly put and left upon them. It is 
 altogether as much the language of one as of the other; 
 " He that is unjust, let him be unjust still; and he that 
 is holy, let 'him be holy still." Rev. xxii, ii. The light 
 of reason does not, any more than that of revelation, 
 force men to submit to its authority : both admonish 
 them of what they ought to do and avoid, together with 
 ihe consequences of each; and after this leave them at 
 full liberty to act just as they please, till the appointed 
 time of judgment. Every moment's experience shows 
 that this is God's general rule of government."^ 
 
 9. To return, then ; Christianity being a promulgation 
 of the law of nature ; being moreover an authoritative ' 
 Christian ohii- promulgation of it, with new light, and other 
 hnpm-tnncT^of circumstanccs of peculiar advantage, adapt- 
 cbristiamty. ^^ ^^ the wants of mankind; these things 
 fully show its importance. Arid it is to be observed 
 further, that as the nature of the case requires, so all 
 Christians are commanded to contribute, by their pro- 
 fession of Christianity, to preserve it in the world, and 
 render it such a promulgation and enforcemicnt of relig- 
 ion. For it is the very scheme of the gospel, that each 
 Christian should, in his degree, contribute toward contin- 
 
 * [It is no veal objection to this, though it may seem so at first sight, 
 t:» say that since Christianity is a remedial system, designed to obviate 
 those veiy evils which have been produced by the neglect and abuse 
 of the light of nature, it ought not to be liable to the same perversions, 
 Becsase, i. Christianity is not designed primarily to remedy the de- 
 fects of nature, but of an unnatural state of ruin into which man- 
 kind were brought by the fall, And, 2. It is remedial of the defects of 
 nature in a great degree by its giving additional advantages. 3. It 
 miglit be impossible that it should be remedial in a greater degree 
 than it is, without destroying man's free agency ; which would be to 
 destroy its own end, the practice of virtue. — Fitzgerald. j 
 
C][AP. I.] Importance of Christianity. 201 
 
 ninguind carrying it on ; all by uniting in the public pro- 
 fession, and external practice of Christianity; some by 
 instructing, by having the oversight, and taking care of 
 this religious community — the Church of God. Now 
 tliis further shows the importance of Christianity, and, 
 which is what I chiefly intend, its importance in a prac- 
 tical sense, or the high obligations we are under to take 
 it into our most serious consideration ; and the danger 
 there must necessarily be, not only in treating it de- 
 spitcfully — which I am not now speaking of — but in dis- 
 regaiding and neglecting it. For this is neglecting to 
 do what is expressly enjoined us, for continuing those 
 benefits to the world, and transmitting them down to 
 future times. And all this holds, even though the only 
 thing to be considered in Christianity were its subservi- 
 ency to natural religion. But, 
 
 10. II. Christianity is to be considered in a further 
 riew, as containing an account of a dispensation of 
 things not at all discoverable by reason, in 
 
 '-^ . •^. , Iinportanl aa 
 
 consequence of which several distinct pre- presenting aew 
 
 . . , ^, . . . . ti-uths. 
 
 cept5 are enjomed us. Christianity is not 
 only an external institution of natural religion, and a 
 new promulgation of God's general providence, as right- 
 eous governor and Judge of the world, but it contains 
 also a revelation of a particular dispensation of provi- 
 dence, carrying on by his Son and Spirit, for the recov- 
 ery and salvation of mankind, who are represented in 
 Scripture to be in a state of ruin. And in consequence 
 of this revelation being made, we are commanded fo be 
 baptizeds not only /// the name of the Father^ but also of 
 ^he Sofiy and of the Holy Ghost ; and other obligations of 
 duty unknown before, to the Son and the Holy Ghost, 
 are revealed. Now the importance of these duties may 
 be judged of by observing that they arise, not from pos- 
 itive command merely, but also from the offices which 
 appear, from Scripture, to belong to those divine persons 
 
202 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 in the gospel dispensation, or from the relations which 
 we are there informed they stand in to us. By reason is 
 revealed the relation which God the Father stands in 
 to us. Hence arises the obligation of duty which we are 
 under to him. In Scripture are revealed the relations 
 which the Son and Holy Spirit stand in to us. Hence 
 arise the obligations of duty which we are under to 
 them. The truth of the case, as one may speak, in each 
 of these three respects being admitted, that God is the 
 governor of the world, upon the evidence of reason ; 
 that Christ is the Mediator between God and man, and 
 the Holy Ghost our Guide and Sanctifier, upon the evi- 
 dence of revelation, the truth of the case, I say, in each 
 of these respects being admitted, it is no more a ques- 
 tion why it should be commanded that we be baptized 
 in the name of the Son and of the Holy Ghost, than that 
 we be baptized in the name of the Father. This matter 
 seems to require to be more fully stated.* 
 
 II. Let it be remembered, then, that religion comes 
 „ ,. . . under the twofold consideration of internal 
 
 Reli^on as in- 
 ternal and ex- and external ; for the latter is as real a part of 
 
 terual. . . 
 
 religion, of true religion, as the former. Now 
 when religion is considered under the first notion, as an 
 inward principle, to be exerted in such and such inward 
 acts of the mind and heart, the essence of natural relig- 
 ion may be said to consist in religious regards to God iht 
 Father Almighty ; and the essence of revealed religion as 
 distinguished from natural, to consist in religious regards 
 to the Son and to the Holy Ghost. And the obligation we 
 are under, of paying these religious regards to each ol 
 these Divine persons respectively, arises from the re- 
 spective relations which they each stand in to us. How 
 these relations are made known, whether by reason or 
 revelation, makes no alteration in the case; because the 
 
 ^ See "The Nature, Obligation, and Efficacy of the Christian S.ac- 
 raments," etc., and Colliber on Revealed Religion, as there quoted. 
 
Chap. I.] Importance of Christianity. 203 
 
 duties arise out of the relations themselves, not out of 
 he manner in which we are informed of them. The 
 Son and Spirit have each his proper office in that great 
 dispensation of Providence, the redemption of the world: 
 the one our Mediator, the other our Sanctifier. Does 
 not, then, the duty of religious regardf^ to both these di- 
 vine persons as»immediately arise to the view of reason, 
 out of the very nature of these offices and relations, as 
 the inward good-will and kind intention, which we owe 
 to our fellow-creatures, [arises I out of the common rela- 
 tions between us and them 7 But it will be asked, 
 "What are the inward religious regards, appearing thus 
 obviously due to the Son and Holy Spirit, as arising not 
 merely from command in Scripture, but from the very 
 nature of the revealed relations which they stand in to 
 us 1 " I answer, The religious regards of reverence, 
 honor, love, trust, gratitude, fear, hope. In what ex- 
 ternal manner this inward worship is to be expressed is 
 a matter of pure revealed command ; as perhaps the ex- 
 ternal manner in which God the Father is to be wor- 
 shiped may be more so than we are ready to think ; 
 but the worship — the internal worship itself — to the Son 
 and Holy Ghost, is no further matter of pure revealed 
 command than as the relations they stand in to us are 
 matter of pure revelation ; for the relations being known, 
 the obligations to such internal worship are obligations 
 of reason, arising out of those relations themselves. In 
 short, the history of the gospel as immediately shows us 
 the reason of these obligations, as it shows us the mean • 
 ing of the words, Son and Holy Ghost. 
 
 12. If this account of the Christian religion be just, 
 those persons wno can speak lightly of it, Moral impor- 
 as of little consequence, provided natural re- Slnity^ovur '** 
 iigion be kept to, plainly forget that Chris- ^<*^'^®^- 
 tianity, even what is peculiarly so called as distinguished 
 from natural religion, has yet somewhat very important, 
 
204 An.\logy of Religion. [Part II 
 
 even of a moral nature. For the office of our Lord be- 
 ing made known, and the relation he stands in to us, 
 the obligation of religious regards to him is plainly 
 moral, as much as charity to mankind is ; since this ob- 
 ligation arises, before external command, immediately 
 out of that his office and relation itself. Those persons 
 appear to forget that revelation is to be considered as in- 
 forming us of somewhat new in the state of mankind and 
 in the government of the world; as acquainting us with 
 some relations we stand in, which could not otheivvise 
 have been known. And these relations being real, 
 (though before revelation we could be under no obliga- 
 tions from them, yet upon their being revealed,) there 
 is no reason to think but that neglect of behaving suit- 
 ably to them will be attended with the same kind of 
 consequences under God's government, as neglecting to 
 behave suitably to any other relations made known to 
 us by reason. And ignorance, whether unavoidable or 
 voluntary, so far as we can possibly see, will just as 
 much, and just as little, excuse in one case as in the 
 other : the ignorance being supposed equally unavoida- 
 ble, or equally voluntary, in both cases. 
 
 13. If, therefore, Christ be indeed the Mediator be- 
 tween God and man ; that is, if Christianity be true ; if 
 he be indeed our Lord, our Saviour, and 
 
 Peril of neglect. 
 
 our God, no one can say what may lollow 
 not only the obstinate, but the careless, disregard to 
 him in those high relations. Nay, no one can say 
 what may follow such disregard, even in the way of 
 natural consequence. (Pages 64, 65, etc.) For as the 
 natural consequences of vice in this life are doubt 
 less to be considered as judicial punishments inflicted 
 by God; so likewise, for aught we know, the judicial 
 punishments of the future life may be in a like way, 
 •or a like sense, the natural consequence of vice, 
 (chai) v;) of men's violating or disregarding the rela- 
 
/ 
 
 Chap. IJ Importance of Christianity. 205 
 
 tious which God has placed them in here, and madf 
 known to them. 
 
 Again : If mankind are corrupted and depraved in 
 their moral character, and so are unfit for that state 
 which Christ is gone to prepare for his disciples ; and 
 if the assistance of God's Spirit be necessary to renew 
 (iieir nature, in the degree requisite to their being qual- 
 ified for that state ; all which is implied in the express, 
 though figurative, declaration " Except a man be born 
 of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God :" 
 supposing this, is it possible any serious person can 
 think it' a slight matter whether or not he makes use of 
 the means expressly commanded by God for obtaining 
 this divine assistance ? especially since the whole anal- 
 ogy of nature shows, that we are not to expect any ben- 
 efits without making use of the appointed means for 
 obtaining or enjoying them. Now reason shows us noth- 
 ing of the particular, immediate means, of obtaining 
 either temporal or spiritual benefits. This, therefore, 
 we must learn either from experience or revelation. 
 And experience the present case does not admit of. 
 
 The conclusion from all this evidently is, that Chris- 
 tianity being supposed either true or credible, it is un- 
 speakable irreverence, and really the most presumptuous 
 rashness, to treat it as a light matter. It can never 
 justly be esteemed of little consequence till it be posi- 
 tively supposed false. Nor do I know a higher and 
 more iim£9rtaiU_ol3ligation which we are under, than 
 that of examining most seriously into the evidence of it, 
 su])pGsing its credibility; and of embracing it, upon 
 supposition of its truth. 
 
 'J'he two following deductions may be proper to be 
 added, in order to illustrate the foregoing observations, 
 and to prevent their being mistaken. 
 
 14. Firbi, Hence we may clearly see where lies the 
 distinction between what is positi\-e and what is m(;r.il 
 
2o6 Analogy of Religion. [Part II 
 
 in religion. Moral /r^r^//f are precepts the reasons of 
 Distindnon be- which we sce ; positive p7'ecepts are pre- 
 pmSptsCdib^ cepts the reasons of which we do not see.* 
 ig-ations. Moral duties arise out of the nature of 
 
 the case itself, prior to external command. Positive 
 duties do not arise out of the nature of the case, but 
 from external command ; nor would they be duties at 
 all, were it not for such command received from him 
 whose creatures and subjects we are. But the manner 
 in which the nature of the case, or the fact of the rela- 
 tion, is made known, this doth not denominate any duty, 
 either positive or moral. That we be baptized in the 
 name of the Father, is as much a positive duty as that 
 we be baptized in the name of the Son ; because both 
 ari^e equally from revealed command ; though the rela- 
 tion^^which we stand Si_ to God the Father is made 
 known to us by reason ; the relation we stand in to 
 Christ, by revelation only. On the other hand, the dis- 
 pensation of the gospel admitted, gratitude as immedi- 
 ately becomes due to Christ from his being the volun- 
 tary minister of this dispensation, as it is due to God 
 the Father from his being the fountain of all good ; 
 though the first is made known to us by revelation only, 
 
 * This is the distinction between moral and positive precepts, con- 
 sidered respectively as such. But yet, since the latter have some- 
 what of a moral nature, we may see the reason of them considered 
 in this view. Moral and positive precepts are in some respects alike, 
 in others respects different. So far as they are alike, we discern the 
 reasons of both ; so far as they are different, we discern the reasons 
 of the former, but not of the latter. (See p. 195, etc., and p. 207.) 
 [It should be further added, to prevent misconceptions, that a pre- 
 cept may be positive, even though it have a ground or reason visible 
 to us, if that reason do not, of itself, constitute the thing required an 
 absolute duty. There are, for instance, visible reasons for the pro- 
 priety of such an initiative rite as Christian baptism, and yet baptisai 
 is only a positive institution, because those reasons are not sufficient 
 of ihemselves to make the observance of such a rite aii, absolute 
 duly. — F.] 
 
Chap. I.] Importance of Christianity. 207 
 
 the second by reason. Hence, also, we may see, and 
 for distinctness' sake it may be worth mentioning, that 
 positive institutions come under a twofold consideration : 
 They are either institutions founded on -.atural religion, 
 as baptism in the name of the Father; though this has 
 also a particular reference to the gospel dispensation, 
 for it is in the name of God as the Father of our Lord 
 Jesus Christ ; or they are external institutions founded 
 on revealed religion, as baptism in the name of the Son 
 and of the Holy Ghost. 
 
 15^ Secondly, From the distinction between what is 
 moral and what is positive in religion, ap- 
 
 , 1 r 1 T r Moral duties 
 
 pears the ground of that peculiar preference superior to posi- 
 which the Scripture teaches us to be due to 
 the former. 
 
 The reason of positive institutions in general is very 
 obvious, though we should not see the reason why such 
 particular ones are pitched upon rather than others. 
 Whoever, therefore, instead of caviling at words will at- 
 tend to the thing itself, may clearly see that positive in- 
 stitutions in general, as distinguished from this or that 
 particular one, have the nature of moral commands ; 
 since the reasons of them appear. Thus, for instance, 
 the exierfial worship of God is a moral duty, though no 
 particular mode of it be so. Care, then, is to be taken, 
 when a comparison is made between positive and moral 
 duties, that they be compared no further than as they 
 are different ; no further than as the former are posi- 
 tive, or arise out of mere external command, the reasons 
 of which we are not acquainted with ; and as the latter 
 are moral, or arise out of the apparent reason of the case, 
 without such external command. Unless this caution 
 be observed we shall run into endless confusion. 
 
 16. Now this being premised, suppose two stai ding 
 precepts enjoined by the same authority; that in cer- 
 tain conjunctures, it is impossible to obey botli ; itat 
 
2o8 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 t;ie former is moral, that is, a' precept of which we see 
 ^^,, , the reasons, and that they hold in the par- 
 
 If the two con- . -^ ' _ 
 
 flict, the moral ticular casc before us; but that the latter is 
 
 to be obeyed. ... 
 
 positive, that is, a precept of which we do 
 not see the reasons : it is indisputable that our obliga* 
 tions are to obey the former, because there is an appareni 
 reason for this preference and none against it. Further, 
 positive institutions, I suppose all those which Chris- 
 tianity enjoins, are means to a moral end ; and the end 
 must be acknowledged more excellent than the means. 
 Nor is observance of these institutions any religious 
 obedience at all, or of any value, otherwise than as it 
 proceeds from a moral principle. This seems to be the 
 strict logical way of stating and determining this mat- 
 ter; but will, perhaps, be found less applicable to prac- 
 tice than may be thought at first sight. 
 
 And therefore, in a more practical, though more la3» 
 way of consideration, and taking the words moral law 
 and positive institutions in the popular sense ; I add, that 
 the whole moral law is as much matter of revealed com- 
 mand as positive institutions are ; for the Scripture en- 
 joins every moral virtue. In this respect, then, they are 
 both upon a level. But the moral law is, moreover, 
 written upon our hearts ; interwoven into our very na- 
 ture. And this is a plain intimation of the author of it, 
 which is to be preferred, when they interfere. 
 
 17. But there is not altogether so much necessity for 
 the determination of this question as some persons seem 
 The question to think. Nor are we left to reason alone tc 
 Jhori^fllirim- determine it. For, first, Though mankind 
 portant. havc, in all ages, been greatly prone to place 
 
 their religion in peculiar positive rites by way of equiv- 
 alent for obedience to moral precepts ; yet, without 
 making any comparison at all between them, and conse- 
 quently without determining which is to have the prefer- 
 ence, the nature of the thing abundantly shows all notions 
 
Chap. I.j Importance of Christianity. 209 
 
 of that kind to be utterly subversive of true religion ; as 
 they are, moreover, contrary to the whole general tenor 
 of Scripture, and likewise to the most express particular 
 declarations of it, that nothing can render us accepted 
 of Gud without moral virtue. 
 
 Secondly^ Upon the occasion of mentioning together 
 positive and moral duties, the Scripture always puts the 
 stress of religion upon the latter and never upon the 
 former; which, though no sort of allowance to neglect 
 the former when they do not interfere with the latter, 
 yet is a plain intimation that when they do, the latter 
 are to be preferred. And further, as mankind are for 
 placing the stress of their religion anywhere rather than 
 upon virtue, lest both the reason of the thing, and the 
 general spirit of Christianity appearing in the intimation 
 now mentioned, should be ineffectual against this prev- 
 alent folly, our Lord himself, from whose command 
 alone the obligation of positive institutions arises, has 
 taken occasion to make the comparison between them 
 and moral precepts, when the Pharisees censured him 
 for eating ivith publicans and sinners ; and also when they 
 censured his disciples iox plucking the ears of corn 071 the 
 Sabbath day. Upon this comparison he has determined 
 expressly, and in form, which shall have the preference 
 when they interfere. And by delivering his authorita- 
 tive determination in a proverbial manner of expression, 
 he has made it general, / will have mercy ^ and not sacri- 
 fice. (Matt, ix, 13, and xii, 7.) The propriety of the 
 word proverbial is not the thing insisted upon, though 
 I think the manner of speaking is to be called so. But 
 that the manner of speaking very remarkably rendeis 
 tlie determination general, is surely indisputable. For 
 had it, in the latter case, been said only that God pre- 
 ferred mercy to the rigid observance of the Sabbath, 
 even then, by parity of reasoning, most justly might we 
 
 have argued that he preferred mercv likewise to the 
 14 
 
2IO Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 observance of other ritual institutions, and in general, 
 moral duties to positive ones. And thus the determina- 
 tion would have been general, though its being so were 
 inferred and not expressed. But as the passage really 
 stands in the gospel, it is much stronger ; for the senre, 
 and the very literal words of our Lord's answer, are as 
 applicable to any other instance of a comparison between 
 positive and moral duties, as to this upon which they 
 were spoken. And if, in case of competition, mercy U 
 to be preferred to positive institutions, it will scarce be 
 thought that justice is to give place to them. It is re- 
 markable, too, thnt as the words are a quotation from 
 the Old Testament, they are introduced on both the fore- 
 mentioned occasions, with a declaration that the Phari- 
 sees did not understand the meaning of them. This, I 
 say, is very remarkable ; for since it is scarce possible 
 for the most ignorant person not to understand the lit- 
 eral sense of the passage in the prophet. (Rosea vi,) and 
 since understanding the literal sense would not have 
 prevented their condemning the guiltless^ (Matt, xii, 7,) it 
 can hardly be doubted, that the thing which our Lord 
 really intended in that declaration was, that the Phari- 
 sees had not learned from it, as they might, wherein the 
 general spirit of religion consists ; that it consists in 
 moral piety and virtue as distinguished from forms and 
 ritual observances. However, it is certain we may learn 
 this from his divine application of the passage in the 
 gospel. 
 
 But as it is one of the peculiar weaknesses of human 
 
 nature, when, upoxi a comparison of two things, one is 
 
 found to be of greater importance than the 
 
 Both important. , . , , . , ^ 
 
 Other, to consider this other as of scarce any 
 importance at all; it is highly necessary that we remind 
 ourselves how great presumption it is to make light of 
 any institutions of divine appointment; that our obliga- 
 tions to obey all God's commands whatever, are abso 
 
Chap. 1.1 Importance of Christianity. 211 
 
 lute and indispensable; and that commands merely pos- 
 itive, admitted to be from him, lay us under a moral 
 obligation to obey them ; an obligation moral in the 
 strictest and most proper sense. 
 
 To these things I cannot forbear adding, that the ac- 
 count now given of Christianity most strongly shows and 
 enforces upon us the obligation of searching the Script- 
 ures, in order to see what thejcheme of revelation real- 
 f-^ly is, instead of determining beforehand from reason 
 what the scheme of it must be. (Chap, iii.) Indeed, if 
 in revelation there be found any passages, the seeming 
 meaning of which is contrary to natural religion, we may 
 most certainly conclude such seeming meaning not to 
 be the real one.* But it is not any degree of a pre- 
 sumption against an interpretation of Scripture, that 
 such interpretation contains a doctrine which the light 
 of nature cannot discover, (pages 213, 214,) or a precept 
 which the law of nature does not oblige to. 
 
 * [This sentiment must be received with caution and applied with 
 care. It has often. been used for evil purposes by those unfriendly to 
 religion. Christianity cannot contradict any truth, but the results of 
 imperfect investigations in science or natural religion must not hasti- 
 ly be assumed as true. Hitherto time has greatly modified or en- 
 tirely removed what at first seemed to be formidable objections. 
 The presumption is in favor of the received teachings of Christianity, 
 and *.hey must not be set aside for every hypothesis that opposers 
 may wantonly and presumptuously set forth.] 
 
212 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 CHAPTER II. 
 
 OF THE SUPPOSED PRESUMPTION AGAINST A REVE- 
 LATION, CONSIDERED AS MIRACULOUS. '■ 
 
 HAVING shown the importance of the Christian 
 revelation, and the obligation which we are un- 
 der seriously to attend to it, upon supposition of its truth 
 or its credibility; the next thing in order is, to consider 
 the supposed p resumptions against revelation in genera l ; 
 which shall be the subiec t_Qf this chapter; and the ob- 
 jections against the Christian in particular, which shall 
 be the subject of some following ones. (Chapters iii-vi.) 
 For it seems the most natural method to remove these 
 prejudices against Christianity, before we proceed to the 
 consideration of the positive evidence for it, and the 
 objections against that evidence. (Chap, vii.) 
 
 It is, I think, commonly supposed that there is some 
 peculiar presumption, from the analogy of nature, against 
 the Christian scheme of things, at l^a^tj^cmTStrmTac.1^ ; 
 so that stronger evidence is necessary to prove the truth 
 and reality of them, than would be sufficient to con- 
 vince us of other events or matters of fact. Indeed, the 
 consideration of this supposed presumption cannot but 
 be thought very insignificant by many persons ; yet as 
 it belongs to the subject of this treatise, so it may tend 
 to open the mind, and remove some prejudices, how- 
 ever needless the consideration of it be, upon its own 
 account. 
 
 No presumption 2. I. I find no appearance of a presump- 
 SSMchemfof ^io"» from the analogy of nature, against the 
 chrisuanity. general scheme of Christianity, that God 
 
Ch. II. ] Presumption against a Revelation, 213 
 
 created and invisibly governs the world by Jesus Christ, 
 and by him also will hereafter judge it in righteousness, 
 that is, render to every one according to his works; and 
 that good men are under the secret influence of his 
 Spirit. Whether these things are or are not to be called 
 miraculous, is perhaps only a question about words; or, 
 however, is of no moment in the case. If the analogy 
 of nature raises any presumption against this general 
 scheme of Christianity, it must be either because it is 
 not discoverable by reason or experience, or else because 
 it is unlike that course of nature, which is. But analogy 
 raises no presumption against the truth of this scheme 
 upon either of these accounts. 
 
 3. First, There is no presumption, from analogy, 
 against the truth of it, upon account of its not being 
 discoverable by reason or experience. For 
 
 None, because 
 
 suppose one who never heard of revelation, not discovered 
 
 r 1 • 11 f 1 by reason. 
 
 of the most improved understanding, and 
 acquainted with our whole system of natural philosophy 
 and natural religion, such a one could not but be sensi- 
 ble that it was but a very small part of the natural and 
 moral system of the universe which he was acquainted 
 with. He could not but be sensible that there must be 
 innumerable things in the dispensations of Providence 
 past, in the invisible government over the world at pres- 
 ent carrying on, and in what is to come, of which he 
 was wholly ignorant, (pages 174, 176,) and which could 
 not be discovered without revelation. Whether the 
 scheme of nature be, in the strictest sense, infinite or 
 not, it is evidently vast, even beyond all possible imag- 
 uiation. And doubtless that part of it which is open to 
 our view ib but as a point in comparison of the whole 
 plan of Providence, reaching throughout eternity past 
 and future; in comparison of what is even now going on 
 in the remote parts of the boundless universe : nay, in 
 con"ij>arison of the whole scheme of this world. And 
 
2 14 Analogy of Religion. [Part 11. 
 
 therefore, that things lie beyond the natural reach of 
 our faculties is no sort of presumption against the truth 
 and reality of them ; because it is certain there are in- 
 numerable things, in the constitution and government 
 of the universe, which are thus beyond the natural reach 
 of )ui faculties. 
 
 Secondly, Analogy raises no presumption against any 
 
 of the things contained in this general doctrine of Script- 
 
 ure now mentioned, upon account of their being unlike 
 
 the known course of nature. For there is 
 
 N<ine, because 
 
 unlike known no presumption at all, from analogy, that the 
 
 com-seofnature. ^ . . . 
 
 whole course of things, or divine government, 
 naturally unknown to us, and every thing in it, is like to 
 any thing in that which is known ; and therefore no pe- 
 culiar presumption against any thing in the former, upon 
 account of its being unlike to any thing in the latter. 
 And in the constitution and natural government of the 
 world, as well as in the moral government of it, we see 
 things, in a great degree unlike one another, and there- 
 fore ought not to wonder at such unlikeness between 
 things visible and invisible. However, the scheme of 
 Christianity is by no means entirely unlike the scheme 
 of nature; as will appear in the following part of this 
 treatise. 
 
 ?The notion of a miracle,* considered as a proof of a 
 divine mission, has been stated with great exactness by 
 divines ; and is, I think, sufficiently understood by every 
 one. There are also invisible miracles :t the incarna- 
 tion of Christ, for instance, which, being secret, cannot 
 
 * [For a beautiful development of the idea of a miracle the readei 
 is referred to Mr. Trench's work on the Miracles, preliminary essay.] 
 
 \ [Papists have claimed transubstantiation as an invisible miracle. 
 But in the case of an invisible miracle the circumstances exclude ex- 
 amination, while transubstantiation invites and is favorable to exam- 
 ination. It is claimed to be public and constant, yet it cannot be 
 discovered to be a miracle. " It supposes the working of a second 
 miracle to make the first ins'isible."] 
 
Cu. 11.] Presumption against a Revelation. 215 
 
 be alleged as a proof of such a mission, but require 
 tlieniselves to be proved by visible miracles. Revela- 
 tion itself, too, is miraculous, and miracles are the proof 
 of it; and the supposed presumption against these shall 
 presently be considered. All which I have been ob- 
 serving here is, that, whether we choose to call every 
 thicg in the dispensations of Providence not discovera- 
 ble without revelation, nor like the known course of 
 things, miraculous ; and whether the general Christian 
 dispensation now mentioned is to be called so or not, 
 the foregoing observations seem entirely to show, that 
 there is no presumption against it, from the analogy of 
 nature. 
 
 4. II. There is no presumption, from analogy, against 
 some operations which we should now call miraculous ; 
 particularly, none against a revelation at the „ 
 
 . . . Nopresnnjption 
 
 beginning of the world; nothing of such agrainst a mmio- 
 
 . ... ulous revelation 
 
 presumption agamst it as is supposed to be at the ^.o^inmng 
 
 r ,. , ° , . , , . , of the world. 
 
 implied or expressed m the word miraculous. 
 For a miracle, in its very notion, is relative to a course 
 of nature ; and implies somewhat different f'-MT) it, con- 
 sidered as being so. Now, either there was no course 
 of nature at the time which we are speaking of; or, if 
 there were, we are not acquainted what the course of 
 nature is upon the first peopling of worlds. And there- 
 fore the question, whether mankind had a revelation 
 made to them at that time, is to be considered, not as a 
 question concerning a miracle, but as a common ques- 
 tion of fact. And we have the like reason, be it more 
 or less, to admit the report of tradition, concerning this 
 question, and concerning common matters of fact of the 
 same antiquity ; for instance, what part of the earth was 
 first peopled. 
 
 Or thus : When mankind was first placed in this state, 
 there was a power exerted totally different from the 
 present course of nature. Now, whether this power, thus 
 
2i6 . Analogy of Religion. TPart II. 
 
 wholly different from the present course of nature, for 
 we cannot properly apply to it the word miracuhtis j 
 whether this power stopped immediately after it had 
 made man, or went on, and exerted itself further in giv- 
 ing him a revelation, is a question of the same kind as 
 whether an ordinary power exerted it-self in such a par- 
 ticular degree and manner or not. 
 
 Or suppose the power exerted in the formation of the 
 world be considered as miraculous, or rather, be called 
 by that name, the case will not be different ; since it 
 must be acknowledged that such a power was exerted. 
 For supposing it acknowledged that our Saviour spent 
 some years in a course of working miracles; there is no 
 more presumption worth mentioning, against his having 
 exerted this miraculous power in a certain degree great- 
 er, than in a certain degree less; in one or two more 
 instances, than in one or two fewer; in this, than in 
 another, manner,* 
 
 * [This observation applies with great force against the modern 
 rationalistic attempts to explain away some of our Saviour's miracles 
 into natural events, as long as it is confessed that he wrought real 
 miracles, or that his mission was really miraculous. Such explana- 
 tions are really more improbable than the common ones which sup- 
 pose a miracle, because there is no general improbability in supposing 
 that a person endowed with the power of working miracles exerted it 
 upon a particular occasion ; whereas there is an improbability in sup- 
 posing that an unusual natural event occurred ; and when this system 
 of interpretation is carried on, and applied to a great number of cases, 
 the improbability of a whole series of strange natural e^ents taking 
 place unaccountably one after the other, amounts, I think, to a far 
 greater improbability than is involved in the admission of miracles ; 
 because every thing that is improbable in \.\\q. physical strangeness of 
 mirac]<:s applies to such a series of odd events, while we are deprived 
 of the means of accounting for them by supposing an extraordinary 
 interposition of the Deity. A romance made up wholly of natural 
 occurrences which happen sometimes, but very rarely, is just as in- 
 credible as a romance made up of stories about genii and enchanters, 
 and things wholly supernatural. The improbability of both, with 
 respect to fhysiral sfrangen-ess, is just the same. 'Some infidels." 
 
Ch. IIJ Presumption against a Revelation. 217 
 
 It is evident, then, that there can be no peculiar pre- 
 sumption, from the analogy of nature, against supposing 
 a revelation when man was first placed upon the earth. 
 I Add, that there does not appear the least intimation 
 /in history or tradition that religion was first reasoned 
 X oui. but the whole of history and tradition makes fui 
 the othei side, that it came into the world by revelatio n. 
 Indeed, the state of religion in the first ages, of which 
 we have any account, seems to suppose and imply that 
 this was the original of it among mankind. And these 
 reflections together, without taking in the peculiar au- 
 thority of Scripture, amount to real and a very material 
 degree of evidence that there was a revelation at the 
 beginning of the world. Now this, as it is a confirma- 
 tion of natural religion, and therefore mentioned in the 
 former part of this treatise, (page 164, etc.,) so likewise, 
 it has a tendency to remove any prejudices against a 
 subsequent revelation. 
 
 5. III. But still it maybe objected, that there is some 
 peculiar presumption, from analogy, against 
 
 1 ... . . None after the 
 
 miracles; particularly agamst revelation, course of nature 
 after the settlement and during the contin- ^^ ^^"^ 
 uance of a course of nature. 
 
 Now with regard to this supposed presumption, it is 
 to be observed in general, that before we can have 
 ground for raising what can, with any propriety, be 
 called an argument from analogy, for or against revela- 
 tion considered as somewhat miraculous, we must be 
 
 says the Archbishop of Dublin, " have labored to prove, concerning 
 sove one of our Lord's miracles, that it might have been the result of 
 ar accidental conjuncture of natural circumstances ; next they en- 
 deavor to prove the same concerning anoiher, and so on ; and thence 
 infer that a'l of them, occurring as a series, might have been so. 
 They might argue, in like manner, that because it is not very im- 
 probable one may throw sixes in any one out of a hundred throws, 
 therefore it is no more improbable that one may throw sixes a hun- 
 dr'^d time? ninning." — Logic, book iii. § IL — F.] 
 
2t8 Analogy of Religion. [Part II 
 
 acquainted with a similar or parallel case. But the 
 history of some other world, seemingly in like circum- 
 stances with our own, is no more than a parallel case ; 
 and therefore nothing short of this can be so. Yet 
 could we come at a presumptive. proof, for or against a 
 revelation, from being informed whether such world had 
 one, or not; such a proof, being drawn from one single 
 instance only, must be infinitely precarious. More 
 particularly : 
 
 6. First of all, There is a very strong presumption 
 against common speculative truths, and 
 
 Presumption , 
 
 against commou asjamst the most ordinary facts, before the 
 
 facts Cesar. . 
 
 proof of them ; which yet is overcome by 
 almost any proof.* There is a presumption of millions 
 
 * [Mr. Mill (Logic, chap, xxiv, § 5) has pointed out a mistake into 
 which writers against Hume's Essay on Miracles have fallen, in con- 
 founding the improbability that an event will occur, with the improb- 
 ability it has occurred — improbability before the fact and improba- 
 bility after it. La Place, differing widely from these writers on 
 religious subjects, has sanctioned the same error in his Essay on 
 Probabilities. 
 
 The presumption against a miracle cannot be estimated by com- 
 paring with the presumption of a previously conceived story, but with 
 the presumption against the truth of a story already refuted, which 
 relates to events not miraculous. 
 
 "Many events are altogether improbable to us befoie we are in- 
 formed of their happening, which are not in the least incredible when 
 we are informed of them, because not contrary to any, even approxi- 
 mate, induction." 
 
 Suppose a thousand numbers to be put in a box, and that it is pro 
 posed to draw out the number 87. Now there are nine hundred 
 and ninety-nine chances to one against drawing that or any othei 
 given number. But if any person of common veracity tells you h-* 
 drew out a number which proved to be 87, you at once b<:lieve him, 
 for as some number was drawn, it was as likely to be this as any other. 
 
 Butler can hardly be said to have fallen into the error noticed by 
 Mr. Mill. He says, " There is a very strong presumption against com- 
 mon speculative truths, and against the most ordinary facts, befort 
 the proof , which yet is overcome by almost any proof." 
 
 In the view of improbability above taken, " the proof of Christian 
 
Cu. Tl.l P'lESUMPTION AGAINST A REVELATION. 2ig 
 
 .o one ngj'nst the story of Cesar ^ or of any other man. 
 For suppose a numbfer of common facts so and so cir- 
 rumstanced, of which one had no kind of proof, should 
 Happen to come into one's thoughts; every one would, 
 without any possible doubt, conclude them to be false. 
 And the like may be said of a single common fact. And 
 from hence it appears, that the question of importance 
 as to the matter before us is, concerning the degree of 
 the peculiar presumption supposed against miracles ; 
 not whether there be any peculiar presumption at all 
 against them. For, if there be the presumption of mill- 
 ions to one against the most common facts, what can a 
 small presumption, additional to this, amount to, though 
 it be peculiar.^ It cannot be estimated, and is as noth- 
 ing.* The only material question is, whether there be 
 
 A 
 
 y from prophecy becomes amazingly strong. There are many pre- 
 dictions, for instance, that Christ should be born at a certain time and 
 place, and under very particular circumstances. The probabilities 
 against such a conjunctttre of events are almost infinite, yet they hap- 
 pened exactly as foretold."] 
 
 * [Butler supposes, in the first instance, a series of events to have 
 come gratuitously into one's mind ; and, after stating the almost in- 
 finite number of chances against its being true, supposes, in the second 
 instance, these ver}' events to be deponed to by a credible witness. 
 Now, that both the first and the second of these things should happen 
 in coincidence together were the strongest possible unlikelihood ; and 
 Butler says truly, that the presumption against a miracle is a small 
 presumption additional to this; foi", in fact, this were itself a miracle. 
 The proper way of estimating the strength of the presumption 
 against, or of the proof that would be necessaiy for the establishment 
 of a miracle, is to brmg it into comparison, not with the presumj tion 
 against the truth of a previously conceived story, but with the pre- 
 sumption against the truth of an already reported story that related 
 t3 events which were not miraculous. There will be found in this 
 case a difference very much greater than the small additional pre- 
 sumption which Butler speaks of; and so, however striking or orig- 
 inal his observation may be, there seems nothing in it which can 
 guide us into a right track for the solution of the difficulty that since 
 his time has so exercised the skill of controversialists. — Chalmfr.^I 
 
220 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 any such presumption against miracles as to render theiia 
 in any sort incredible ? 
 
 7. Secondly^ If we leave out the consideration of relig- 
 ion, we are in such total darkness upon what causes, 
 
 Aside from re- occasious, reasons, . or circumstances the 
 ^^ of'LaSi present course of nature depends, that there 
 ''**'• does not appear any improbability for or 
 
 against supposing, that five or six thousand years may 
 have given scope for causes, occasions, reasons, or cir- 
 cumstances from whence miraculous interpositions may 
 have arisen. And from this, joined with the foregoing 
 observation, it will follow, that there must be a presump- 
 tion, beyond all comparison greater, against \\\q particu- 
 lar common facts just now instanced in, than against 
 miracles \xi general ; before any evidence of either. 
 
 8. But, thirdly^ Take in the consideration of religion, 
 or the moral system of the world, and then we see dis- 
 tinct particular reasons for miracles ; to af- 
 
 Eeli^on affords ^ . . . . . , 
 
 reasons for mir- ford mankmd mstruction additional to that 
 of nature, and to attest the truth of it. And 
 this gives a real credibility to the supposition, that it 
 might be part of the original plan of things that there 
 should be miraculous interpositions. 
 
 9. Then, lastly^ Miracles must not be compared to 
 common natural events ; or to events which, though 
 
 Miracles not uncommon, are similar to what we daily ex- 
 Sth^ common'^ periencc ; but to the extraordinary phenom- 
 events. ^^^ of nature. And then the comparison will 
 
 be between the presumption against miracles, and the 
 presumption against such uncommon appearances, sup- 
 ])ose, as comets, and against there being any such powers 
 in nature as magnetism and electricity, so contrary to 
 the properties of other bodies not endued with these 
 powers. And before any one can determine, whether 
 there be any peculiar presumption against miracles more 
 than against other extraordinary things, he must consider 
 
Ch. II.] PRESUMPnON AGAINST A REVELATION. 22 1 
 
 what, upon first hearing, would be the presumption 
 against the last-mentioned appearances and powers to a 
 person acquainted only with the daily, monthly, and an- 
 nual course of nature respecting this earth, and with 
 those common powers of matter which we every day see. 
 lo. Upon all this I conclude, that there certainly is 
 no such presumption against miracles as to render them 
 in anywise incredible ; that on the contrary, our'being 
 able to discern reasons for them, gives a positive credi- 
 bility to the history of them, in cases where those rea- 
 sons hold ; and that it is by no means certain that there 
 is any peculiar presumption at all, from analogy, even 
 in the lowest degree, against miracles, as distinguished 
 from other extraordinary phenomena; though it is not 
 worth while to perplex the reader with inquiries into the 
 abstract nature of evidence in order to determine a 
 question which without such inquiries we see (page 
 217, etc.) is of no importance. 
 
222 Analogy of Religion. LPart II. 
 
 CHAPTER III. 
 
 OF OUR INCAPACITY OF JUDGING WHAT WERE TO BE 
 EXPECTED IN A REVELATION ; AND THE CREDIBIL- 
 ITY. FROM ANALOGY, THAT IT MUST CONTAIN THINGS 
 APPEARING LIABLE TO OBJECTIONS.* 
 
 B 
 
 ESIDES the objections against the evidence for 
 Christianity, many are alleged against the scheme 
 of it ; against the whole manner in which it 
 
 Obiections to ■ . -■ ° 
 
 Chiistianity it- is put and left with the world, as well as 
 
 self: \ , . , , . . ^ . 
 
 agamst several particular relations in Script- 
 ure : objections drawn from the deficiencies of revela- 
 /tion; from things in it appearing to men foolishnessy 
 ^(i Cor. i, 28;) from its containing matters of offense 
 which have led, and it must have been foreseen would 
 
 * [The object of this chapter is to prove the likelih ood, in the gen- 
 eral, of a revelation bein^ liable to objec tions, or at le ast that its be- 
 ing so forms no proper ?Troiind for.the rejection of i t. This reduces 
 us to the consideration of its proofs, as the only relevant inquiry that 
 we have to do with. Doubtless eveiy objection against these proofs 
 must be entertained, and satisfactorily disposed of. But this is differ- 
 ent from objections against the subject-matter of a revelation. These 
 form what are here called its internal improbabilities, much insisted 
 on by Deists ; but all proceeding on the competency of the human 
 \ understanding to decide upon a topic which is here shown to be much 
 I too high for it, we being no more judges beforehand of what a reve- 
 lation ought to be, either in the way it ought to be conducted or what 
 it should contain, than we are judges anterior to experience of what 
 ought to be the course of nature. The alleged imperfections and 
 anomalies in the methods by which Christianity distributed and gave 
 forth her lessons, are most effectually met by the analogous imperfec- 
 tions and anomalies, if such they must be called, as contrary to all 
 ll)e likelihoods of previous expectation, that might be observed in the 
 gifts and teaching of nature — Cummers.] 
 
Chap. III.] Of Credibility of Revelation. 223 
 
 lead, into strange enthusiasm and superstition, and be 
 made to serve the purposes of tyranny and wickedness; 
 from its not being universal ; and, which is a thing of 
 tlie same kind, from its evidence not being so conv'nc- 
 ing and satisfactory as it might have been ; for this last 
 is sometimes turned into a positive argument agamst 
 Its truth. (Chap, vi.) 
 
 It would be tedious, indeed impossible, to enumerate 
 the several particulars comprehended under the objec- 
 tions here referred to, they being so various according 
 to the different fancies of men. There are persons who 
 
 I think it a strorig__iil4^cUQ.n against the authority of 
 Scripture that it is not composed by rules of art, agreed 
 upon by critics, for polite and correct writing. And the 
 scorn is inexpressible, with which some of the prophetic 
 parts of Scripture are treated ; partly through the rash- 
 ness of interpreters, but very much also on account of 
 the hieroglyphical an d figurative lang uage in which they 
 are left us. 
 
 2. Some of the principal things of this sort shall be 
 particularly considered in the following chapters. But 
 my design at present is, to observe in general, with re- 
 spect to this whole way of arguing, that such objections 
 upon supposition of a revelation, it is highl y ?L^^y»— 
 credible, beforehand, we should be incompetent jud ges 
 of it to a great degre e ; and that it would contain many 
 llrungs appearing to us liable to great objections, in case 
 » we judge of it otherwise t h.an by the analogy of natu re. 
 And, therefore, though objections against the evidence of 
 Christianity are most seriously to be considered, yet ob- 
 jections against Christianity itself are, in a great measure, 
 frivolous; almost all objections against it,L£xc£i)Ung 
 tlios e which are alleged againsj : the particular proofs of 
 its coming from God. I express myself with caution, 
 lest I should be mistaken to vilify reason, which is, in- 
 deed, the only faculty we have wherewith to judge con- 
 

 224 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 cerning any thing, even revelation itself; or be misun- 
 derstood to assert, that a supposed revelation cannot be 
 proved false from internal characters. For it may contain 
 clear immoralities or contradictions ; and either of these 
 would prove it false. Nor will I take upon me to affirm, 
 that nothing else can possibly render any supposed rev- 
 elation incredible. Yet still the observation above is, I 
 fhink, true beyond doubt, that objections against Chris- 
 tianity, as distinguished from objections against its evi- 
 dence, are frivolous. To make out this is the general 
 gV,^ '^design of the present chapter. And with regard to the 
 p^^' whole of it, I cannot but particularly wish that the proofs 
 might be attended to, rather than the assertions caviled 
 at upon account of any unacceptable consequences, 
 whether real or supposed, which may be drawn from 
 them. For after all, that which is true must be admit- 
 ted ; though it should show us the shortness of our fac- 
 ^ulties, and that we are in nowise judges of many things 
 /of which we are apt to think ourselves very competent 
 ones. Nor will this be any objection with reasonable 
 men ; at least upon second thought it will not be any 
 objection with such, against the justness of the following 
 observations : — ^ 
 
 3. As God governs the world, and instructs his crea- 
 tures, according to certain laws or rules in the known 
 course of nature, known by reason together with expe- 
 Being incom rience ; so the Scripture informs us of a 
 the^Mturirdis- schcmc of divinc providence additional to 
 more''"ro?the ^his. It relates that God has, by revelation, 
 revealed. instructed men in things concerning his gov- 
 
 _J ernment which they could not otherwise have known, 
 and reminded them of things which they might other- 
 wise know ; and attested the truth of the whole by mir- 
 lacles. Now if the natural and the revealed dispensation 
 of things are both from God — if they coincide with each 
 other, and together make up one scheme of providence 
 
Chap. IIIJ Of Credibility of Revelation. 225 
 
 —our being incompetent judges of one must render it 
 credible tha/- we may be incompetent judges also of the 
 other. Since, upon experience, the acknowledged con- 
 stitution and course of nature is found to be greatly dif- 
 ferent from what, before experience, would have been 
 expected; and such as, men fancy, there lie great ob- 
 jections against: this renders it beforehand highly cred- 
 ible that they may find the revealed dispensation, like- 
 wise, if they judge of it as they do of the constitution of 
 nature, very different from expectations formed before- 
 hand; and liable, in sppearance, to great objections: 
 objections against the scheme itself, and against the de- 
 grees and manners of the miraculous interpositions by 
 which it was attested and carried on. Thus suppose a 
 p rinc e to govern his dominions in the wisest illustration— 
 manner possible, by common known laws ; ^^mmon*^kws[ 
 and that upon some exigencies he should ^^" 
 suspend these laws, and govern, in several instances, in 
 a different manner: if one of his subjects were not a 
 competent judge beforehand by what common rules the 
 government should or would be carried on, it could not 
 be expected that the same person would be a competent 
 judge in what exigencies, or in what manner, or to what 
 degree, those laws commonly observed would be sus- 
 pended or deviated from. If he wer e not ajjjdgejif the 
 t wisdom of the ordinary administration, there is no re a- 
 son to think he would be a judge of the wi sdom of th e 
 extraordinary. If he thought he had objections against 
 the former, doubtless it is highly supposable he might 
 Ihink, also, that he had objections against the latter. 
 And thus, as we fall into infinite follies and mistakes 
 whenever we pretend, otherwise than from experience 
 and analogy, to judge of the constitution and course of 
 nature, it is evidently supposable beforehand that we 
 should fall into as great in pretending to judge, in like 
 Planner, concerning revelation. Nor is there any more 
 
226 Analogy of Religion. LFart II. 
 
 ground to expect thxat this latter should appear to us 
 clear of objections than that the former should. 
 
 4. These observations relating to the whole of Chris- 
 tianity, are applicable to inspiration in particular. As 
 we are'in no sort judges beforehand by what 
 
 This analogy . , , 
 
 applied to in- laws or rules, in what degree or by what 
 
 epiration. . . , , , 
 
 means, it were to have been expected thai 
 God would naturally instruct us; so upon supposition 
 of his affording us light and instruction by revelation, 
 additional to what he has afforded us by reason and ex- 
 perience, we are in no sort judges by what methods, 
 and in what proportion, it were to be expected that this 
 supernatural light and instruction would be afforded us. 
 We know not beforehand what degree or kind of natu- 
 ral information it were to be expected God would afford 
 men, each by his own reason and experience; nor how 
 far he would enable and effectually dispose them to 
 communicate it, whatever it should be, to each other; 
 nor whether the evidence of it would be certain, highly 
 probable, or doubtful ; nor whether it would be given 
 with equal clearness and conviction to all. Nor could 
 we guess, upon any good ground I mean, whether natu- 
 ral knowledge, or even the faculty itself by which we 
 are capable of attaining it, reason, would be given us at 
 once, or gradually. 
 
 In like manner, we are wholly ignorant what degree 
 of new knowledge it were to be expected God would 
 give mankind by revelation, upon supposition of his af- 
 fording one; or how far, or in what way, he would in- 
 terpose miraculously to qualify them to whom he shouKJ 
 originally make the revelation, for communicating the 
 knowledge given by it ; and to secure their doing h to 
 the age in which they should live; and to secure its be- 
 ing transmitted to posterity. We are equally ignorant, 
 whether the evidence of it would be certain, or highly 
 probable, or doubtful, (see chap, vi ;) or whether all 
 
Chap. IIIJ Of Credibility of Revelation. 227 
 
 who should have any degree of instruction from it, and 
 any degree of evidence of its truth, would have the 
 same : or whether the scheme would be revealed at 
 once, or unfolded gradually. Nay, we are not in any 
 sort able to judge whether it were to have been expected 
 that the revelation should have been committed to writ- 
 ing, or left to be handed down, and consequently cor- 
 rupted, by verbal tradition, and at length sunk under it, if 
 mankind so pleased, and during such time as they are per- 
 mitted, in the degree they evidently are, to act as they will. 
 
 5. But it may be said, "that a revelation in some of 
 the above-mentioned circumstances, one, for instance, 
 which was not committed to writing, and ^,. . 
 
 ^ , Objection to an 
 
 thus secured against danger of corruption, unwritten reve- 
 would not have answered its purpose." I 
 ask, what purpose ? It would not have answered all the 
 purposes which it has now answered, and in the same 
 degree ; but it would have answered others, or the same 
 in different degrees. And which of these were the pur- 
 poses of God, and best fell in with his general govern- 
 ment, we could not at all have determined beforehand. 
 Now since it has been shown that we have no princi- 
 ples of reason upon which to judge, beforehand, how it 
 were to be expected revelation should have been left, or 
 what was most suitable to the divine plan of government, 
 in any of the fore-mentioned respects; it must be quite 
 frivolous to object afterward, as to any of them, against 
 its being left in one way rather than another ; for this 
 would be to object against things upon account of their 
 being different from expectations, which have been 
 shown to be without reason. 
 
 6. And thus we see that the only question concern- 
 ing the truth of Christianity is, 
 it be a real revelation ; not wheth( 
 attended with every circumstance 
 should have looked for: and concerning the autiiori.y 
 
 )nly question concern- / 
 
 ;, whether The only qnes- / 
 i-U^y ',*■ Kq ^"" is tliis. Is I 
 tner it Oe Chnstianitv -1 I 
 
 ■ which we ^*^^' ••'*^-^''^'ti'>" ? ' 
 
228 Analogy of Religion. [Part II 
 
 of Scripture, whether it be wha t it claims to be ; 
 not whether it be a book of such sort, and so pro- 
 mulgated, as weak men are apt to fancy a book con- 
 taining a divine revelation should. And, therefore, 
 neither obscurity nor seeming inaccuracy of style, nor 
 various readings, nor early disputes about the authors 
 of particular parts, nor any other things of the like Vind,, 
 t' )iigh they had been much more considerable in de- 
 gree than they are, could overthrow the authority of the 
 Scripture; unless the prophets, apostles, or our Lord, 
 had promised, that the book, containing the divine rev- 
 elation, should be secure from those things. Nor, in- 
 deed, can anv objections overthrow such a kind of 
 revelation as the ChristiaUj^claims to be, since there are 
 n^ objections agaipst the morality of jt, (page 217, etc.,) 
 but such as can show that there is \^ proof of niiracles 
 ' Jh^^ wrought originally m a ttes tation of it ; i^o a ppeara nce of 
 any thing m iracu lous in its obtaining in. the world ; iior 
 fl^^ueC^ apy of prophecy, that is, of events foretold, which human 
 f J sagacity could not foresee. If it can be shown, that the 
 
 I proof alleged f or all these is ab s olutely none ^ t all, then 
 y is revelation overtu rned. But were it allowed that the 
 proof of any one, or all of them, is lower than is allowed ; 
 yet w hile any pi ^ oof of them remairts , revelation will stand 
 upon much the same footing it does at present, as to all 
 the purposes of life and practice, and ought to have the 
 like influence upon our behavior. 
 
 7. From the foregoing observations, too, it will follow, 
 and those who will thoroughly examine into revelation 
 Mod3s of ar- wiU find it worth remarking, that there are 
 cabio^to Script- Several ways of arguing, which, though just 
 *^* with regard to other writings, are not appli 
 
 cabl? to Scripture ; at least not to the prophetic parts 
 of it, We cannot argue, for instance, that this cannot 
 
 I be the sense or intent of such a passage of Scripture, for 
 if it had it would have been expressed more j)lainiy, or 
 
 I 
 
Chap. III.] Of Credibility of Revelation. 229 
 
 have been represented under a more apt figure or hiero- 
 glyphic; yet we may justly argue thus with respect to 
 common books. And the reason of this difference is 
 very evident; that in Scriptu re . Fe are not compete nt | 
 judges , as we are in commo n bo oks, how plainly it were 
 to have been expected, what is the true sense should 
 have been expressed, or under how apt an image figured. 
 'I'he only question is, what appearance there is that this 
 is the sense ? and scarce at all, how much more de- 
 terminately or accurately it might have been expressed 
 or figured ? 
 
 8. " But is it not self-evident, that internal improba- 
 bilities of all kinds weaken external proba- objection, in- 
 ble proof? " Doubtless. But to what prac- ISesteaken^'ex- 
 tical purpose can this be alleged here, when t^™aip»"oof- 
 it has been proved before, (page 217, etc.,) that real in- 
 ternal improbabilities, which rise even to moral certain- 
 ty, are overcome by the most ordinary testimony ? and 
 when it now has been made appear, that we scarce know 
 what are improbabilities, as to the matter we are here 
 considering.? as will further appear from what follows. 
 
 For though from the observations above made it is 
 manifest that we are not in any sort competent judges 
 what supernatural instruction were to have been ex- 
 pected ; and though it is self-evident that the objections 
 of an incompetent judgment must be frivolous; yet it 
 may be proper to go one step further, and observe that 
 if men will be regardless of these things, and pretend to 
 judge of the Scriptures by preconceived expectations, 
 the analogy of nature shows beforehand, not only that it 
 is highly credible they may, but also probable that they 
 will, imagine they have strong objections against it, how- 
 ever really unexceptionable ; for so, prior 10 experience, 
 they would think they had, against the cir- similar ohjec 
 
 , , , , 11 tions against 
 
 cumstances, and degreeis, and the whole smpture and 
 
 r. ^^ ^ • ^ ..• I,- I. ' rrjj instructiou fi-oiil 
 
 manner of that mstruction, which is afforded nature. 
 
230 Analogy of RrLioiox. IPart If. 
 
 by thi ordinary course of nature. Were the instruction 
 vvhich God affords to brute creatures by instincts and 
 mere propensions, and to mankind by these together 
 with reason, matter of probable proof, and not of certain 
 observation, it would be rejected as incredible, in many 
 instances of it, only upon account of the means by which 
 this instruction is given, the seeming disproportions, 
 the limitations, necessary conditions, and circumstances 
 of it. For instance : would it not have been thought 
 highly improbable that men should have been so much 
 more capable of discovering, even to certainty, the gen- 
 eral laws of matter, and the magnitudes, paths, and rev- 
 olutions of the heavenly bodies ; than the occasions and 
 cures of distempers, and many other things in which 
 human life seems so much more nearly concerned than 
 in astronomy ? How capricious and irregular a way of 
 information, would it be said, is that of inve7itiqji . by 
 means of which nature instructs us in matters of science, 
 and in many things upon which the affairs of the world 
 greatly depend ; that a man should by this faculty be 
 made acquainted with a thing in an instant, when per- 
 haps he is thinking of somewhat else, which he has in 
 vain been searching after, it may be, for years. 
 
 So, likewise, the imperfections attending the only 
 method by which nature enables and directs us to com- 
 municate our thoughts to each other are innumerable. 
 Language is, in its very nature, inadequate, ambiguous, 
 liable to infinite abuse, even from negligence; and so 
 liable to it from design, that every man can deceive and 
 betray by it. And to mention but one instance more, 
 that brutes without reason should act, in many respects, 
 with a sagacity and foresight vastly greater than what 
 men have in those respects, would be thought impossible. 
 Yet it is certain they do act with such superior fore- 
 sight ; whether it be their own, indeed, is ano'ther ques- 
 tion. From these things it is highly credible before- 
 
Chap. III.] Of Credibility of Revelation. 231 
 
 hand, that upon supposition God should afford men 
 some additional instruction by revelation, it would be 
 with circumstances, in manners, degrees, and respects 
 which we should be apt to fancy we had great objections 
 against the credibility of. Nor are the objections against 
 the Scripture, nor against Christianity in general, at all 
 more or greater than the analogy of nature would be- 
 forehand, — not perhaps give ground to expect, for this 
 analogy may not be sufficient, in some cases, to ground 
 an expectation upon, — but no more nor greater than 
 analogy would show it, beforehand, to be supposable 
 and credible, that there might seem to lie against reve- 
 lation. 
 
 9. By applying these»»general observations to a partic- 
 ular objection, it will be more distinctly seen how they 
 are applicable to- others of the like kind; and, indeed, 
 to almost all objections against Christianity as distin- 
 guished from objections against its evidence. It appears 
 from Scripture, that as it was not unusual objection tc 
 in the apostolic age for persons, upon their {J^'^'tS^S 
 conversion to Christianity, to be endued ^^^^^''^y '^se. 
 with miraculous gifts ; so, some of those persons exer- 
 cised these gifts in a strangely irregular and disorderly 
 manner; and this is made an objection against their be- 
 ing really miraculous. Now the foregoing observations 
 quite remove this objection, how considerable soever it 
 may appear at first sight. For, consider a person en- 
 dued with any of these gifts, for instance, that of tongues; 
 it is to be supposed that he had the same power over this 
 miraculous gift as he would have had over it had it been 
 the effect of habit, of study, and use, as it ordinarily is; or 
 the same power over it, as he had over any other natural 
 endowment. Consequently, he would use it in the same 
 manner he did any other ; either regularly and upon prop- 
 er occasions only, or irregularly and upon improper ones ; 
 according to his sense of decency, and his character of 
 
232 Analogy of Religion. IPart II 
 
 prudence.* Where, then, is the objection ^ Why if 
 this miraculous power was indeed given to tl e world to 
 propagate Christianity, and attest the truth of it, we 
 might, it seems, have expected that other sort of persons 
 should have been chosen to be invested with it ; or that 
 tliese should, at the same time, have been endued with 
 nruden ce ; or that they should have been continually 
 restrained and directed in the exercise of it : that is, 
 that God should have miraculously interposed, if at all, 
 in a different manner or higher degree. But, from the 
 observations made above, it is undeniably evident that 
 we are not judges in what degrees and manner it were 
 to have been expected he should miraculously inter- 
 pose ; upon supposition of his doing it in some degree 
 and manner. Nor, in the natural course of providence, 
 are superior gifts of memory, eloquence, knowledge, and 
 other talents of great influence, conferred only on per- 
 sons of prudence and decency, or such as are disposed 
 to make the properest use of them. Nor is the instruc- 
 tion and admonition naturally afforded us for the con- 
 duct of life, particularly in our education, commonly 
 given in a manner the most suited to recommend it ; but 
 
 * [Warburton, as quoted by Fitzgerald, points out the distinction 
 between such supernatural endowments as the gift of tongues and oth- 
 ers. " The power of healing or working miracles is, during the whole 
 course of its operation, one continual arrest or diversion of the gen- 
 eral laws of matter and motion. It was therefore fitting that this 
 power should be given occasionally. But the speaking with tongues^ 
 when once the gift was conferred, became thenceforth a natural 
 power ; just as the free and perfect use of the members of*'lhe body, 
 after they have been restored by miracles to the exercise of their nat- 
 uial functions. Indeed, to have lost the gift of tongues after this 
 temporary use of it would imply another miracle ; for it must "lave 
 been by actual deprivation, unless we suppose the apostles we: e ir- 
 rational organs through which divine sounds were conveyed. ... In 
 healing, the apostles are to be considered as the workers of a miracle ; 
 and in speaking strange tongues, as the persons on whom the miracle 
 is performed."] 
 
Chap. III.] Of Credibility of Revelation. 233 
 
 nften with circumstances apt to prejudice us against 
 such instruction. 
 
 10. One might go on to add, that there is a great re- 
 semblance between the light of nature and of revelation 
 in several other respects.* Practical Chris- other anaiofrics 
 tianity, or that faith and behavior which ren- w^nTty^'Lid'^na- 
 ders a man a Christian, is a plain and obvi- *^®' 
 ous thing; like the common rules of conduct, with 
 respect to our ordinary temporal affairs. The more 
 distinct and particular knowledge of those things, the 
 study of which the apostle calls ^^ going on unto perfec- 
 tion^'' and of the prophetic parts of revelation, like many 
 parts of natural and even civil knowledge, may require 
 very exact thought and careful consideration. The 
 hinderances too, of natural and of supernatural light and 
 knowledge, have been of the same kind. And as it is 
 owned the whole scheme of Scripture is not yet under- 
 stood, so, if it ever comes to be understood before the 
 ^^restitution of ail things " and without miraculous inter- 
 positions, it must be in the same way as natural knowl- 
 edge is come at, by the continuance and progress of 
 learning and of liberty, and by particular persons at- 
 tending to, comparing, and pursuing, intimations scat- 
 tered up and down it, which are overlooked and disre- 
 garded by the generality of the world. For this is the 
 way in which all improvements are made; by thought- 
 
 * [This passage marks the essential difference between the Protest- 
 ant and Roman notions of developments. The Protestant are : I. Not 
 levelopments of the /"cz/V//, hnioi i\\Q wisdom, of the gospel ; whereas 
 ♦be Roman are developments of mere necessary articles of faith 
 ?. The Protestant developments are arrived at by the free examina- 
 tion of Scripture with all the helps of learning and reason ; whereas 
 the Roman are principally drawn from tradition, and were elaborated 
 in ages when the study of the original languages having been gener- 
 ally abandoned, and sound principles of criticism but little known, 
 the Church was destitute of adequate means for developing the sense 
 •if the sacred writings. — Fitz(;ktiai,d.1 
 
234 Analogy of Religion. [Part II 
 
 ful men's tracing on obscure hints, as it were, dropped 
 us by nature accidentally, or which seem to corne into 
 our minds by chance. Nor is it at all incredible, that a 
 
 I book which has been so long in the possession of man- 
 kind should contain many truths as yet undiscovered. 
 For all the same phenomena, and the same faculties of 
 investigation, from which such great discoveries in n?t- 
 ural knowledge have been made in the present and last 
 age, were equally in the possession of mankind several 
 thousand years before. And possibly it might be in- 
 tended, that events, as they come to pass, should open 
 and ascertain the meaning of several parts of Scripture. 
 
 11. It may be objected, that this analogy fails in a 
 Objection. Nat- material rcspcct ; for that natural knowledge 
 
 ural knowledfje • r ^•..^ t-> i. t i 
 
 of little impor- ^^ oi little or no conscquencc. But I have 
 *^"^''" been speaking of the general instruction 
 
 which nature does or does not afford us. And besides, 
 some parts of natural knowledge, in the more common, 
 restrained sense of the words, are of the greatest conse- 
 quence to the ease and convenience of life. But sup- 
 pose the analogy did, as it does not, fail in this respect, 
 yet it might be abundantly supplied from the whole 
 constitution and course of nature; which shows that 
 
 IGod does not dispense, his 2;ifts according to our notions 
 of the advantage ana^yconsequence they would be \f to 
 us. And this in general, with his method of dispensing 
 knowledge in particular, would together make out an 
 analogy full to the point before us. 
 
 12. But it may be objected still further, and more 
 Objection from generally — " The Scripture represents the 
 
 Kutton^ ^/^^ world as in a state of ruin, and Christianity 
 IChristianity. ^g ^^ expedient to recover it, to help in 
 these respects where nature fails ; in particular, to sup- 
 ply the deficiencies of natural light. Is it credible, then, 
 1 that so many ages should have been let pass before a 
 matter of such a sort, of so great and so general impor- 
 
/ 
 
 Chap. IIIJ Of Credibility of RevelatiOxW 235 
 
 Vance, was made known to mankind? and then that it 
 should be made__ knnwn to sn f^ma]] a p^r{ <7f fhpm ? Is 
 it conceivable, that this supply should be so very defi- 
 cient, should have the like obscurity and doubtfulness, 
 be liable to the like perversions ; in short, lie open to all 
 the like objections, as the light of nature itself?' 
 (Chap, vi.) 
 
 Without determining how far this in fact is so, I an- 
 swer ; it is by no means incredible that it might be so, 
 I if the lig ht_gf nature and of rev plnfinn hft from the same 
 *hand. Men are naturally liable to disease s : for which 
 God, in his good providence, has provided natural rem- 
 edies. (Chap. V.) But remedies existing in nature have 
 j^been unknown to mankind for many ages ; are known 
 but to few now; probably many valuable ones are not 
 known yet. Great has been, and is, the obscurity and 
 difficulty, in the nature and application of them. Cir- 
 cumstances seem often to make them very improper 
 where they are absolutely necessary. It is after long 
 labor and study, and many unsuccessful endeavors, that 
 they are brought to be as useful as they are ; after high 
 contempt and absolute rejection of the most useful we 
 have ; and after disputes and doubts, which have seemed 
 to be endless. The best remedies, too, when unskillful- 
 ly, much more if dishonestly, applied, may produce new 
 diseases; and with the rightest application, the success 
 of them is often doubtful. In many cases they are not 
 at all effectual ; where they are, it is often very slowly : 
 and the application of them, and the necessary regimen 
 accompanying it, is, not uncommonly, so disagreeable, 
 that some will not submit to them ; and satisfy them- 
 sehes with the excuse that if they would, it is not cer- 
 tain whethei^ it would be successful. And many per- 
 sons, who labor under diseases, for which there are 
 known natural remedies, are not so happy as to be al- 
 ways, if ever, in the way of them. In a word, the reme- 
 
236 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 dies which nature has provided for diseases are neither 
 certain, perfect, nor universal. And indeed the same 
 principles of arguing, which would lead us to conclude 
 that they must be so, would lead us likewise to conclude 
 that there could be no occasion for them ; that is, that 
 tltere could be no diseases at all. And therefore oui 
 .experience that there are diseases, shows that it is 
 /credible beforehand, upon supposition nature ha s pro- 
 I vid ed remedies for t hem, that these remedies may be, 
 as by experience we find they are, not certain, nor 
 perfect, nor universal ; because it shows, that the prin- 
 ciples upon which we should expect the contrary are 
 fallacious. 
 
 13. And now, what is the just consequence from all 
 these things .>* Not that reason is no judge of what is 
 The province offered to US as being of divine revelation, 
 of reason. -poY this wouM be to infer that we are una- 
 
 ble to judge of any thing because we are unable to judge 
 of all things. Reason can, and it ought, to judge not 
 only of the meaning, but also of the morality and the evi- 
 dence, of revelation. 
 
 First. It is the province of reason to judg e of the 
 morality of the Scripture ; that is, not whether it con- 
 tains things different from what we should have expect- 
 ed from a wise, just, and good Being; for objections 
 from hence have been now obviated, but whether it con- 
 tains things plainly cont radictor y to wisdom, j ustice , or 
 jgoodness ; to what the light of nature teaches us of God. 
 And I know nothing of this sort objected against Script- 
 ure, excepting such objections as are formed upon sup- 
 positions which would equally conclude that the consti- 
 tution of nature is contradictory to wisdom, justice, or 
 goodness ; which most certainly it is not. Indeed, there 
 are some particular precepts in Scripture, given to par- 
 ticular persons, requiring actions which would be im- 
 moral and vicious, were it not for such precepts. But 
 
Chap. III.] Of Credibility of Revelation. 237 
 
 it is easy to see that all these are of such a kind as tliat 
 the precept changes the whole nature of the case and of 
 the action ; and both constitutes and shows that not to 
 be unjust or immoral, which, prior to the precept, must 
 have appeared and really have been, so: which may 
 well be, since none of these precepts are contrary to im- 
 mutable morality. If it were commanded to cultivate 
 the principles, and act from the spirit of treachery, in- 
 gratitude, cruelty ; the command would not alter the 
 nature of the case, or of the action, in any of these in- 
 stances. But it is quite otherwise in precepts, which re- 
 quire only the doing an external action ; for instance, 
 taking away the property or life of any. For men have no 
 right to either life or property, but what arises solely from 
 the grant of God : when this grant is revoked, they cease 
 to have any right at all in either; and when this revoca- 
 tion is made known, as surely it is possible it may be, it 
 must cease to be unjust to deprive them of either. And 
 though a course of external acts, which without com- 
 mand would be immoral, must make an immoral habit, 
 yet a few detached commands have no such natural 
 tendency. I thought proper to say thus much of the 
 few Scripture precepts, w^hich require not vicious ac- 
 tions, but actions which would have been vicious had it 
 not been for such precepts ; because they are sometimes 
 weakly urged as immoral, and great weight is laid upon 
 objections drawn from them. But to me there seems 
 no difficulty at all in these precepts, but what arises 
 from their being offenses; that is, from their being 
 liable to be perverted, as indeed they are, by wicked 
 desig?iing men, to serve the most horrid purposes, 
 and, perhaps, to mislead the weak and enthusiastic. 
 And objections from this head are not objections 
 against levelation, but against the whole notion of re- 
 ligion as a trial : and against the general constitution 
 of nature. ^ 
 
238 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 Secondly. Reason is able to judge, and must, of the 
 evidence of revela tion, and of the objections urged 
 ao'ainst that evidence; which shall be the subject of a 
 following chapter. (Chap, vii.) 
 
 14. But the consequence of the foregoing 'observations 
 is, that the question upon which the truth ol Christian- 
 we need con- ity depends, is scarce at all, what objections 
 ^ions "against ^" there are against its scheme, since there are 
 ^"'"^*^' none against the morality of it ; but what ob- 
 
 jections there are against its evidence : or, what proof there 
 remains of it^ after due allowances made for the objections 
 against that proof : because it has been shown, that the 
 objections against Christianity^ as distinguished from objec- 
 tions against its evidence^ are frivolous. For surely very 
 little weight, if any at all, is to be laid upon a way of 
 arguing and objecting, which, when applied to the gen- 
 eral constitution of nature, experience shows not to be 
 conclusive : and such, I think, is the whole way of ob- 
 jecting treated of throughout this chapter. It is resolv- 
 able into princi])les, and goes upon suppositions, which 
 mislead us to think that the Author of nature would 
 not act as we experience he does ; or would act, in such 
 and such cases, as we experience he does not in like 
 cases. But the unreasonableness of this way of object- 
 ing will appear yet more evidently from hence, that the 
 chief things thus objected against are justified, as shall 
 be further shown,* by distinct, particular, and full anal- 
 ogies, in the constitution and course of nature. 
 
 But it is to be remembered, that as frivolous as objec- 
 tions of the foregoing sort against revelation are, yet, 
 when a supposed revelation is more consistent with it- 
 self, and has a more general and uniform tendency to 
 promote virtue, than, all circumstances considered, could 
 have been expected from enthusiasm and political views ; 
 this is a presumptive proof of its not proceeding from 
 
 * Chap, iv, latter ]-)art ; and v, vi. 
 
Chap. III.] Of Credibility of Revelation. 259 
 
 them, and so of its truth; because we are competent 
 judges what might have been expected from enthusiasm 
 and political views.* 
 
 * [In arguing that a revelation cannot have come from perfect 
 wisdom, because there are in it things which seem to us foolishness 
 wc are arguing in the dark. But in arguing that it cannot have come 
 from human fraud or enthusiasm we are dealing with matters which 
 we may perfectly understand, because coming within the sphere of 
 our daily experience. See the latter argument admirably pressed in 
 the Archbishop of Dublin's Essay on the Peculiarities of the Chris- 
 tian Religion, and on the Omissions of Scripture. — F-l 
 
240 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 CHAPTER IV. 
 
 OF CHRISTIANITY, CONSIDERED AS A SCHEME OR COS- 
 STITUTION, IMPERFECTLY COMPREHENDED. 
 
 IT hath been now shown * that the analogy of nature 
 renders it highly credible, beforehand, that suppos- 
 ins; a revelation to be made, it must contain 
 
 Objections to be ° 
 
 expected. How many things very dirferent from what we 
 should have expected, and such as appear 
 open to great objections; and that this observation, in 
 good measure, takes off the force of those objections, or 
 rather, precludes them. But it may be alleged that this 
 is a very partial answer to such objections, or a very un- 
 satisfactory way of obviating them ; because it doth not 
 show at all, that the things objected against can be wise, 
 just, and good ; much less that it is credible they are so. 
 It will, therefore, be proper to show this distinctly, by 
 applying to these objections against the wisdom, justice, 
 and goodness of Christianity, the answer above f given 
 to the like objections against the constitution of nature; 
 before we consider the particular analogies in the latter 
 to the particular things objected against in the former. 
 Now that which affords a sufficient answer to objections 
 against the wisdom, justice, and goodness of the cons<-i- 
 tution of nature, is its being a constitution, a system, or 
 scheme, imperfectly comprehended ; a scheme, in which 
 means are made use of to accomplish ends, and which 
 is carried on by general laws. For from these things it 
 has been proved, not only to be possible, but also to be 
 
 * In the foregoing chapter. 
 
 f Part i, chap, vii, to which this all along refers. 
 
Chap. IV. 1 Of Christianity as a Scheme. 241 
 
 credible, that those things which are objected against 
 may be consistent with wisdom, justice, and goodness ; 
 nay, may be instances of them : and even that the con- 
 stitution and government of nature may be perfect in 
 the highest possible degree. If Christianity, then, be a 
 scheme, and of the like kind, it is evident the like ob- 
 jections against it must admit of the like answer. And, 
 2. I. Christianity is a scheme quite beyond our compre- 
 hension. The moral government of God is ^ 
 
 ° . Chnstianitybe 
 
 exercised by gradually conductmg thmgs yond our com 
 
 . . prehension. 
 
 SO, m the course of his providence, that 
 every one, at length, and upon the whole, shall receive 
 according to his deserts ; and neither fraud nor violence, 
 but truth and right, shall finally prevail. Christianity is 
 a particular scheme under this general plan of provi- 
 dence, and a part of it, conducive to its completion with 
 regard to mankind : consisting itself also of various 
 parts, and a mysterious economy, which has been car- 
 rying on from the time the world came into its present 
 wretched state, and is still carrying on, for its recovery, 
 by a divine person, the Messiah ; who is " to gather to- 
 gether in one the children of God that are scattered 
 abroad," (John xi, 52,) and establish "an everlasting 
 kingdom, wherein dwelleth righteousness." 2 Pet. iii, 13. 
 And in order to it, after various manifestations of things 
 relating to this great and general scheme of Providence, 
 through a succession of many ages ; — (for " the Spirit of 
 Christ, which was in the prophets, testified beforehand 
 his sufferings, and the glory that should follow : unto 
 whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but 
 unto us, they did minister the things which are now 
 reported unto us by them which have preached the 
 gospel; which things the angels desire to look into," 
 (i Pet. i, II, 12:) — at'ter various dispensations, looking 
 forward and preparatory to this final salvation, " in the 
 
 fullness of time," when Infinite Wisdom thought fit, He, 
 1(3 
 
242 Analogy of Religkin. [Part II. 
 
 "being in the form of God, made himself of no reputa- 
 tion, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was 
 made in the likeness of men ; and being found in fash- 
 ion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient 
 to death, even the death of the cross : wherefore God 
 also hath highly exalted him, and given him a name which 
 is above every name : that at the name of Jesus every 
 knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in 
 earth, and things under the earth ; and that every tongue 
 should confess, that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory 
 of God the Father." Phil, ii, 6-11. Parts, likewise, of 
 this economy are the miraculous mission of the Holy 
 Ghost, and his ordinary assistances given to good men; 
 the invisible government which Christ at present exer- 
 cises over his Church; that which he himself refers 
 to in these words, " In my Father's house are many 
 mansions — I go to prepare a place for you," (John xiv, 
 2 ;) and his future return to "judge the world in right- 
 eousness," and completely re-establish the kingdom of 
 God. " For the Father judgeth no man ; but hath com- 
 mitted all judgment unto the Son ; that all men should 
 honor the Son, even as they honor the Father." John 
 v, 22, 23. " All power is given unto him in heaven and 
 in earth." Matt, xxviii, 18. "And he must reign, till he. 
 hath put all enemies under his feet. Then cometh the 
 end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom to 
 God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all 
 rule, and all authority, and power. And when all things 
 shall be subdued unto him, then shall the Son also him- 
 self be subject unto him, that put all things under him. 
 ihat God may be all in all." i Cor. xv, 25-28. Now 
 little, surely, need be said to show, that this system or 
 scheme of things is but imperfectly comprehended by 
 us. The Scripture expressly asserts it to be so. And 
 indeed one cannot read a passage relating to this "great 
 mystery of godliness," (i Tim. iii, 16,) but what imme 
 
Chap. IV.] Of Christianity as a Scheme. 243 
 
 diately runs up into something which shows us our ig- 
 norance in it, as every thing in nature shows us our 
 ignorance in the constitution of nature. And whoever 
 will seriously consider that part of the Christian scheme 
 which is revealed in Scripture, will find so much more 
 unrevealed, as will convince him, that, to all the pui- 
 poses of judging and objecting, we know as little of it as 
 of the constitution of nature. Our ignorance, therefore, 
 is as much an answer to our objections against the per- 
 fection of one as against the perfection of the other. 
 (Page 172, etc.) 
 
 3. II. It is obvious, too, that in the Christian dispen- 
 sation, as much as in the natural scheme of things, means 
 are made use of to accomplish ends. And Means used to 
 the observation of this furnishes us with the ^<^^p^^^^^^^' 
 same answer to objections against the perfection of 
 Christianity, as to objections of the like kind against the 
 constitution of nature. It shows the credibility, that 
 the things objected against, how foolish (i Cor. i) soever 
 they appear to men, may be the very best means of ac- 
 complishing the very best ends. And their appearing 
 foolishness is no presumption against this, in a scheme 
 so greatly beyond our comprehension. (Page 178.) 
 
 4. III. The credibility that the Christian dispensa- 
 tion may have been, all along, carried on by general 
 laws, (pages 179, 180,) no less than the Asin nature, so 
 course of nature, may require to be more Sried^on by 
 distinctly made out. Consider, then, upon ^^^^''^i ^-'^^s. 
 what ground it is we say, that the whole common course 
 of nature is carried on according to general foreordained 
 'aws. We know, indeed, several of the general laws of 
 matter; and a great part of the natural behavict of liv- 
 ing agents is reducible to general laws. But we know in a 
 manner nothing, by what laws storms and tempests, 
 earthquakes, famine, pestilence, become the instruments 
 i)^ destrMrti<^)n to mankind. And the law?, bv whic h 
 
244 Analogy of Religion. ''Part II. 
 
 persons born into the world at such a time and place,, 
 are of such capacities, geniuses, tempers; the laws, by 
 which thoughts come into our mind, in a multitude of 
 cases; and by which innumerable things happen, of the 
 greatest influence upon the affairs and state of the 
 world ; these laws are so wholly unknown to us, that wc 
 call the events which come to pass by them, accidental; 
 though all reasonable men know certainly, that there 
 cannot, in reality, be any such thing as chance ; and 
 conclude that the things which have this appearance 
 are the result of general laws and may be reduced 
 into them. It is, then, but an exceeding little way, 
 and in but a very few respects, that we can trace 
 up the natural course of things before us to gen- 
 eral laws. And it is only from analogy that we con- 
 clude the whole of it to be capable of being reduced 
 into them ; only from our seeing that part is so. It is 
 from our finding that the course of nature, in some re- 
 spects and so far, goes on by general laws, that we con- 
 clude this of the rest. And if that be a just ground for 
 such a conclusion, it is a just ground also, if not to con- 
 clude yet to apprehend, to render it supposable and cred- 
 ible, which is sufficient for answering objections, that 
 God's miraculous interpositions may have been all along, 
 in like manner, hy general laws of wisdom. Thus, that 
 miraculous powers should be exerted at such times, 
 upon such occasions, in such degrees and manners, and 
 with regard to such persons rather than others ; that the 
 affairs of the world being permitted to go on in the'i 
 natural course so far, should just at such a point have a 
 new direction given them by miraculous interpositions ; 
 that these interpositions should be exactly in such de- 
 grees and respects only ; all this may have been by gen- 
 eral laws. These laws are unknown, indeed, to us ; but 
 no more unknown than the laws from whence it is that 
 some, die as...soon as the^ are born and. othe.rS; live .to ex- 
 
Chap. IV.] Of Christianity as a Scheme. 245 
 
 treme old age ; that one man is so superior to anothci 
 in understanding ; with innumerable more things, which, 
 as was before observed, we cannot reduce to any laws 
 or rules at all; though it is taken for granted they are 
 as much reducible to general ones as gravitation. Now, 
 if the rerealed dispensations of Providence and mirac- 
 ulous interpositions be by general laws, as well as God's 
 ordinary government in the course of nature, made 
 known by reason and experience; there is no more rea- 
 son to expect that every exigence, as it arises, should be 
 provided for by these general laws of miraculous inter- 
 positions than that every exigence in nature should, 
 by the general laws of nature ; yet there might be 
 wise and good reasons, that miraculous interpositions 
 should be by general laws ; and that these laws should not 
 be broken in upon, or deviated from, by other miracles. 
 5. Upon the whole, then, the appearance of deficien- 
 cies and irregularities in nature is owing to its being a 
 scheme but in part made known, and of such The scheme 
 
 , • !.• 1 1 • J • i.1- 1. of nature and 
 
 a certam particular kmd m other respects. Christianity im- 
 Now we see no more reason why the frame sto(S^*''The^fn". 
 and course of nature should be such a ^^'■'^"^^- ' 
 
 scheme, than why Christianity should. And that the 
 former is such a scheme, renders it credible that the lat- 
 ter, upon supposition of its truth, may be so too. And 
 as it is manifest that Christianity is a scheme revealed 
 but in part, and a scheme in which means are made use 
 of to accomplish ends, like to that of nature; so the 
 credibility that it may have been all along carried on 
 by general laws, no less than the course of nature, has 
 been distinctly proved. And from all this it is before- 
 hxnd credible that there might, I think probable that 
 there would, be the like appearance of deficiencies and 
 irregularities in Christianity as in nature ; that is, that 
 Christianity would be liable to the like objections, as 
 the frame of nature. And these objections are answcieJ 
 
246 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 by these observations concerning Christianity ; as the 
 like objections against the frame of nature are answered 
 by the like observations concerning the frame of nature. 
 
 6. The objections against Christianity, considered as 
 a matter of fact, (page 222, etc.,) having in general been 
 obviated in the preceding chapter; and the same con- 
 sidered as made against the wisdom and goodness of it 
 having been obviated in this ; the next thing, according to 
 the method proposed, is to show that the principal objec- 
 tions, in particular against Christianity, maybe answered 
 by particular and fall analogies in nature. And as one 
 of them is made against the whole scheme of it togeth- 
 er, as just now described, I choose to consider it here, 
 rather than in a distinct chapter by itself. 
 
 The thing objected against this scheme of the gospel 
 is, " that it seems to suppose God was reduced to the 
 Objection. God necessity of a long series of intricate means 
 wmpeiiedtouse ^^ Order to accomplish his ends, the recov- 
 toirv^ehiTpw- ^^y and salvation of the world; in like sort 
 P**^®- as men, for want of understanding or power, 
 
 not being able to come at their ends directly, are forced to 
 go round-about ways, and make use of many perplexed 
 contrivances to arrive at them." Now every thing which 
 we see shows the folly of this, considered as an objec- 
 tion against the truth of Christianity. For according to 
 our manner of conception, God makes use of variety of 
 means, what we often think tedious ones, in the natural 
 course of providence, for the accomplishment of all 
 his ends. Indeed, it is certain there is somewhat in 
 this matter quite beyond our comprehension ; but the 
 mystery is as great in nature as in Christianity. We 
 know what we ourselves aim at as final ends, and what 
 courses we take merely as means conducing to those 
 ends. But we are greatly ignorant how far things are 
 
\ 
 
 Chap. IVJ Of Christianity as a Scheme. 247 
 
 considered by the Author of nature, under the single 
 notion of means and ends ; so as that it may be said, 
 this is merely an end, and that merely means, in his re- 
 gard. And whether there be not some peculiar absurd- 
 ity ir_ our very manner of conception concerning this 
 matter, somewhat contradictory, arising from our ex- 
 tremely imperfect views of things, it is impossible to say. 
 However, thus much is manifest, that the whole natu- 
 ral world, and government of it, is a scheme or system ; 
 not a fixed, but a progressive one ; a scheme in which 
 the operation of various means takes up a great length 
 of time before the ends they tend to can be attained. 
 The change of seasons, the ripening of the fruits of the 
 earth, the very history of a flower, is an instance of this ; 
 and so is human life. Thus vegetable bodies, and those 
 of animals, though possibly formed at once, yet grow up 
 by degrees to a mature state. And thus rational agents, 
 who animate these latter bodies, are naturally directed 
 to form each his own manners and character by the 
 gradual gaining of knowledge and experience, and by a 
 long course of action. Our existence is not only suc- 
 cessive, as it must be of necessity, but one state of our 
 life and being is appointed by God to be a preparation 
 for another; and that to be the means of attaining to 
 another succeeding one : infancy to childhood ; child- 
 hood to youth; youth to mature age. Men are impa- 
 tient, and for precipitating things; but the Author of 
 nature appears deliberate throughout his operations; 
 accomplishing his natural ends by slow, successive steps.* 
 
 * [" We shall find that all the great developments of the moral be- 
 ing have resulted in the advantage of society, and that all the great 
 developments of the social condition have raised the character of 
 humanity. The movement takes its peculiar character from which- 
 ever of the two facts predominates and lends its luster. 
 
 " Sometimes, long intervals of time, a thousand transformations and 
 obstacles, occur before the second fact is developed, and qomes as it 
 were to complete the civilization which the first had commenced. 
 
248 Analogy of Religion ( P.m<t II. 
 
 And there is a plan of things beforehand laid out, which 
 from the nature of it, requires various systems of means, 
 as well as length of time, in order to the carrying on its 
 several parts into execution. Thus in the daily course of 
 natural providence, God operates in the very same man- 
 ner as in the dispensation of Christianity, making one 
 thing subservient to another; this to somewhat further; 
 and so on, through a progressive series of means which 
 extend both backward and forward, beyond our utmost 
 view. Of this manner of operation, every thing we see 
 in the course of nature is as much an instance as any 
 part of the Christian dispensation. 
 
 But close observation convinces us of the bond which unites them. 
 The ways of Providence are not confined within narrow limits ; he 
 flurries not himself to display to-day the consequence of the principle 
 that he yesterday laid down ; he will draw it out in the lapse of ages, 
 when the hour is come ; and even according to our reasoning, logic 
 is not the less sure because it is slow. Providence is unconcerned as 
 to time ; his march (if I may be allowed the simile) is like that of the 
 fabulous deities of Homer through space ; he takes a step, and ages 
 have elapsed. How long a time, how many events, before the regen- 
 eration of the moral man by Christianity exercised its great and le- 
 gitimate influence upon the regeneration of the social state ! It has 
 succeeded, however ; who can at this day gai nsay it ? " — GuiZOT'S 
 Lectures on Civilization in Europe^ Lecture I.] 
 
Chap. V.] Appointment of a Mediator. 249 
 
 L 
 
 CHAPTER V. 
 
 OF THE PARTICULAR SYSTEM OF CHRISTIANITY ; THE 
 APPOINTMENT OF A MEDIATOR, AND THE REDEMP- 
 TION OF THE WORLD BY HIM. 
 
 ^"^HERE is not, I think, any thing relating to Chris- 
 tianity which has been more objected against than 
 the med i ation of Christ, in some or other of its parts. 
 Yet, upon thorough consideration, there seems nothing 
 less justly liable to it.* For, 
 
 I. The whole analogy of nature removes all imagined 
 presumption against the general notion of The analogy of 
 ''a Mediator betweeii God and 7nanr (i Tim. ^wVcS'to 
 ii, 5.) For we find all living creatures are '^ ^^^'^^o''- 
 brought into the world, and their life in infancy is pre- 
 served, by the instrumentality of others; and every sat- 
 isfaction of it, some way or other, is bestowed by the 
 like means. So that the visible government which God 
 exercises over the world, is by the instrumentality and 
 mediation of others. And how far his invisible govern- 
 
 * [Philosophers make shameful and dangerous mistakes when they 
 judge of the divine economy. He cannot, they tell us, act thus ; it 
 would be contrary to his wisdom or his justice, etc. But while they 
 make these peremptory assertions, they show themselves to be unac- 
 quainted with the fundamental rules of their own science and with 
 the origin of all late improvements. True philosophy would begin 
 me other way, with observing the constitution of the world, how God 
 has made us, and in what circumstances he has placed us, and thcti, 
 from what he has done, form a sure judgment what he would do. 
 Thus might they learn " the invisible things of God from those which 
 are clearly seen," the things which are not accomplished from those 
 which are. — Powell's Use and Abuse of Philosophy, quoted by 
 .Vlalcom.] 
 
250 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 ment be, or be not so, it is impossible to determine at 
 all by reason. And the supposition that part of it is so, 
 appears, to say the least, altogether as credible as the 
 contrary. There is, then, no sort of objection, from 
 the light of nature, against the general notion of a me^* 
 diator between God and man, considered as a doctrine 
 of Christianity, or as an appointment in this dispensa- 
 tion; since we find by experience that God does appoint 
 mediators, to be the instruments of good and evil to us, 
 the instruments of his justice and his mercy. And the 
 objection here referred to is urged, not against media- 
 tion in that high, eminent, and peculiar sense in which 
 Christ is our mediator; but absolutely against the whole 
 notion itself of a mediator at all. 
 
 2. II. As we must suppose that the world is under the 
 proper moral government of God, or in a state of relig- 
 Punishmentwiii ion, before we can enter into consideration 
 
 follow vice as a r ii i j j i. • • „ iU _ 
 
 natural conse- 01 the revealed doctrine concerning the re- 
 quence. dcmption of it by Christ ; so that supposi- 
 
 tion is here to be distinctly taken notice of. Now the 
 divine moral government which religion teaches us, im- 
 plies, that the consequence of vice shall be misery, in 
 some future state, by the righteous judgment of God. 
 That such consequent punishment shall take effect by his 
 appointment, is necessarily implied. But as it is not in 
 any sort to be supposed that we are made acquainted with 
 all the ends or reasons for which it is fit future punish- 
 ments should be inflicted, or why God has appointed 
 such and such consequent misery should follow vice ; 
 and as we are altogether in the dark how or in what 
 manner it shall follow, by what immediate occasions, or 
 by the instrumentality of what means; there is no ab- 
 surdity in supposing, it may follow in a way analogous to 
 that, in which many miseries follow such and such courses 
 of action at present; poverty, sickness, infamy, untime- 
 ly death by diseases, death from the hands of civil jus- 
 
Chap. V.] Appointment of a Mediator. 251 
 
 tice. There is no absurdity in supposing future punish- 
 ment may follow wickedness of course, as we speak, or 
 in the way of natural consequence, from God's original 
 constitution of the world ; from the nature he has given 
 us, and from the condition in which he places us; or in 
 a like manner, as a person rashly trifling upon a preci- 
 pice, in the way of natural consequence, falls down ; in 
 the way of natural consequence, breaks his limbs, sup- 
 pose ; in the way of natural consequence of this, with- 
 out help, perishes.* 
 
 3. Some good men may perhaps be offended with 
 hearing it spoken of as a supposable thing, that the fu- 
 ture punishments of wickedness may be in the way of 
 
 * There is a clear distinction between right and wrong, and inno- 
 cence and guilt. Right and wrong depend on unchangeable rela- 
 tions, and consequent obligations : while innocence and guilt depend 
 on conscious and avoidable violations of God's law. Obedience to 
 God's laws, whether intentional or not, whether rendered by a Chris- 
 tian or an infidel, brings naturally a degree of favor and benefit, just 
 as cases of disobedience cause evil and suffering. Whether rashly and 
 foolishly or ignorantly a man approaches a precipice and falls over, 
 he will suffer and perhaps lose his life. If he takes poison intention- 
 ally or ignorantly he will suffer and die. 
 
 This natural relation between obedience or disobedience of law 
 and consequences, good or evil, is readily perceived in OYdma.ry life ; 
 but the same natural connection exists between willful sin and pui;- 
 , ishment, present and future. In no sense is this punishment merel) 
 arbitrary, which in any individual case the Divine will might suspend 
 or remove. The principles of the Divine government that connect 
 happiness with virtue and misery with vice were established before 
 the existence of the sinner, and are as unchangeable as the character 
 of Jehovah. God could as readily send a sinless archangel to perdition 
 as fiee ar unrepenting sinner from the consequences of sin and raise 
 him to heuven. Both are impossible. In this view we can see how 
 God consistently, with tenderness and earnestness, entreats man to 
 Uun from his evil way, and yet when he refuses leaves him to the 
 consequences of guilt. 
 
 Ill Christ the law is satisfied and made honorable, and in the ap- 
 pointed way man may be saved, but God cannot ^ave him otherwise. 
 
252 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 natural consequence ; as if this were taking the execu- 
 tion of justice out of the hands of God and 
 
 Objection. Then . . ^ -r. i 
 
 nature, not God, giving it tO nature. But they should re- 
 executes justice. 
 
 member that when things come to pass ac- 
 jcording to the course of nature, this does not hinder 
 Jthem from being his doing who is the God of nature; 
 nnd that the Scripture ascribes those punishments to 
 divine justice which are known to be natural; and 
 which must be called so, when distinguished from such 
 as are miraculous. But after all, this supposition, or 
 rather this way of speaking, is here made use of only by 
 way of illustration of the subject before us. For since 
 
 /it must be admitted that the future punishment of wick- 
 edness is n^t^ajn^JLJ^rof__ar^iUaT^ but of 
 reason, equity, and justice; it comes, for aught I see, to 
 the same thing, whether it is supposed to be inflicted in 
 a way analogous to that in which the temporal punish- 
 ments of vice and folly are inflicted, or in any other way. 
 And though there were a difference, it is allowable in 
 the present case to make this supposition, plainly not 
 an incredible one, that future punishment may follow 
 wickedness in the way of natural consequence, or ac- 
 cording to some general laws of government already 
 established in the universe. 
 
 4. III. Upon this supposition, or even without it, we 
 
 may observe somewhat, much to the present purpose, in 
 
 Naturaiescape the Constitution of nature, or appointments 
 
 puShmlnr^of ^^ Providence : the provision which is made 
 
 ^°®- that all the bad natural consequences of 
 
 men's actions should not always actually follow ; or that 
 
 such bad consequences as, according to the sottkd 
 
 course of things, would inevitably have followed if not 
 
 prevented, should in certain degrees be prevented. We 
 
 • are apt presumptuously to imagine that the world might 
 
 I have been so constituted as that there would not have 
 
 ^been any such thing as misery or evil. On the contrary. 
 
•^ 
 
 Chap. V.] Appointment of a Mediator/^^ 253 
 
 Ave find the Author of nature permits it. But tiien h e 
 has provided reliefs , and, in many cases, perfect rem e- 
 die s fo r it, after some pains and difficulties; reliefs and 
 remedies even for that evil which is the fruit of our own 
 misconduct, and which, in the course of nature, would 
 have continued, and ended in our destruction, but for 
 such remedies. And this is an instance both of severity 
 and of indulgence, in the constitution of nature. Thus 
 all the bad consequences, now mentioned, of a man's 
 trifling upon a precipice, might be prevented. And 
 though all were not, yet some of them might, by proper 
 interposition, if not rejected; by another's coming to 
 the rash man's relief, with his own laying hold on that 
 relief, in such sort as the case required. Persons may 
 do a great deal themselves toward preventing the bad 
 consequences of their follies ; and more maybe done by 
 themselves, together with the assistance of others, their 
 fellow-creatures; which assistance nature requires and 
 prompts us to. This is the general constitution of the 
 world. 
 
 Now suppose it had been so constituted, that after 
 such actions were done, as were foreseen naturally to 
 drav/ after them misery to the doer, it should This naturally 
 have been no more in human power to have th'e^?o^the'^*fu- 
 prevented that naturally consequent misery, ^^®" 
 in any instance, than it is in all ; no one can say wheth- 
 er such a more severe constitution of things might n'»t 
 yet have been really good. But that, on the contrary, 
 provision is made by nature, that we may and do, to so 
 great degree, prevent the bad natural effects of our fol- 
 lies; this may be called mercy, or compassion, in the 
 original constitution of the world ; compassion as dis- 
 tinguished from goodness in general. And the whole 
 known constitution and course of things affording us in- 
 stances of such compassion, it would be according to 
 the analogy of nature to hope, that, however ruinous the 
 
25 4 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 natural consequences of vice might be, from the general 
 laws of God's government over the universe, yet provis- 
 ion might be made, possibly might have been originally 
 made, for preventing those ruinous consequences from 
 inevitably following ; at least from following universally 
 and in all cases. 
 
 5. Many, I am sensible, will wonder at finding this 
 made a question, or spoken of as in any degree doubt- 
 
 Presumption ful. The generality of mankind are so fa? 
 SjSryet^ground ^^<^^ having that awful sense of things, 
 for hope. which the present state of vice and misery 
 
 and darkness seems to make but reasonable, that they 
 have scarce any apprehension, or thought at all, about 
 this matter, any way ; and some serious persons may 
 have spoken unadvisedly concerning it. But let us ob- 
 serve, what we experience to be, and what, from the 
 very constitution of nature, cannot but be, the conse- 
 quences of irregular and disorderly behavior ; even of 
 such rashness, willfulness, neglects, as we scarce call 
 vicious. Now it is natural to apprehend that the bad 
 consequences of irregularity will be greater, in propor- 
 tion as the irregularity is so. And there is no compari- 
 son between these irregularities and the greater instances 
 of vice, or a dissolute profligate disregard to all religion ; 
 if there be any thing at all in religion. For consider 
 what it is for creatures, moral agents, presumptuously to 
 introduce that confusion and misery into the kingdom 
 of God which mankind have in fact introduced ; to 
 blaspheme the sovereign Lord of all; to contemn his 
 authority ; to be injurious, to the degree they are, to 
 their fellow-creatures, the creatures of God. Add that 
 the effects of vice, in the present world, are often ex- 
 treme misery, irretrievable ruin, and even death : and 
 upon putting all this together it will appear, that as no 
 one can say in what degree fatal the unprevented con- 
 sequences of vice may be, according to the general rule 
 
Chap. VJ Appointment of a Mediator. 255 
 
 of Divine government; so it is by no means intuitively 
 certain how far these consequences could possibly, in 
 the nature of the thing, be prevented, consistently with 
 the eternal rule of right, or with what is, in fact, the 
 moral constitution of nature. However, there would be 
 large ground to hope, that the universal governmeni 
 was not so severely strict, but that there was room for 
 pardon, or for having those penal consequences pre- 
 vented. Yet, 
 
 6. IV. There seems no probability that any thing we 
 could do, would alone, and of itself, prevent we can in no 
 them ; prevent their following, or being inflict- J^^se ^wnse- 
 ed. But one would think, at least, it were im- <i"^^<^s- 
 possible that the contrary should be thought certain. For 
 we are not acquainted with the whole of the case. We 
 ./are not informed of all the reasons which render it fit that 
 ' future punishments should be inflicted ; and therefore 
 cannot know whether any thing we could do would make 
 such an alteration as to render it fit that they should 
 be remitted. We do not know what the whole natural 
 or appointed consequences of vice are, nor in what way 
 they would follow, if not prevented ; and therefore can 
 in no sort say whether we could do any thing which 
 would be sufficient to prevent them. Our ignorance 
 being thus manifest, let us recollect the analogy of na- 
 ture, or providence. For though this may be but a 
 slight ground to raise a positive opinion upon in this 
 matter, yet it is sufficient to answer a mere arbitrary as- 
 sertion, without any kind of evidence urged by way of 
 objection against a doctrine the proof of which is not 
 ► reason, but revelation. Consider then: people ru.n 
 y their fortunes by extravagance ; they brii.p^ diseases up- 
 l on themselves by excess; they incur the penalties ot 
 civil laws, and surely civil government is natural ; will 
 sorrow for these follies past, and behaving well for the 
 future, alone and of itself prevent the natural coiisc- 
 
256 Analogy of Religion. [Part IT. 
 
 quences of them ? On the contrary, men's natural abil- 
 ities of helping themselves are often impaired ; or if not, 
 yet they are forced to be beholden to the assistance of 
 others, upon several accounts and in different ways : 
 assistance which they would have had no occasion for 
 had it not been for their misconduct; but which, in the 
 disadvantageous condition they have reduced them- 
 selves to, is absolutely necessary to their recovery and 
 retrieving their affairs. Now since this is our case, con- 
 siderii 5 ourselves merely as inhabitants of this world, 
 and as having a temporal interest here, under the natu- 
 ral government of God, which, however, has a great deal 
 moral in it ; why is it not supposable that this may be 
 our case also, in our more important capacity, as under 
 his perfect moral government, and having a more general 
 and future interest depending .'* If we have misbehaved 
 in this higher capacity, and rendered ourselves obnox- 
 ious to the future punishment which God has annexed 
 to vice, it is plainly credible, that behaving well for 
 the time to come, may be — not useless, God forbid — 
 but wholly insufficient, alone and of itself, to prevent 
 that punishment, or to put us in the condition which we 
 should have been in had we preserved our innocence.* 
 
 And though we ought to reason with all reverence, 
 whenever we reason concerning the divine conduct, yet 
 
 * [Mr. Newman notices a distinction between the facts of revela- 
 tion and its principles, and considers the argument from analogy 
 more concerned with the latter than the former. *' The revealed 
 facts are special and singular from the nature of the case, but the re- 
 vealed principles are common to all the works of God ; and if the 
 Author of nature be the author of grace, it may be expected that the 
 principles discussed in them will be the same, and form a connecting 
 link between them. In this identity of principle lies the analogy of 
 natural and revealed religion in Butler's sense of the word. The incar- 
 nation is a fact, and cannot be paralleled by any thing in nature ; the 
 doctrine of mediation is a principle, and is abundantly exemplified m 
 nature." — Essay on Developments, quoted by Malcom.] 
 
Chap. VJ Appointment of a Mediator. 257 
 
 it may be added, that it is clearly contrary to all our 
 notions of government, as well as to what 
 
 ° ' , , Reformation 
 
 is, in fact, the general constitution of nature, ^^es no hope of 
 
 ° . ' escape. 
 
 to suppose that domg well for the future 
 should, in all cases, prevent all the judicial bad conse- 
 quences of having done evil, or all the punishment an 
 nexed to disobedience. And we have manifestly nothing 
 from whence to determine in what degree, and in what 
 cases, reformation would prevent this punishment, even 
 supposing that it would in some. And though the effi- 
 cacy of repentance itself alone, to prevent what man- 
 kind had rendered themselves obnoxious to, and recov- 
 er what they had forfeited, is now insisted upon in oppo- 
 sition to Christianity ; yet, by the general prevalence of 
 propitiatory sacrifices over the heathen world, this no- 
 tion of repentance alone being sufficient to expiate guilt, 
 appears to be contrary to the general sense of mankind. 
 
 Upon the whole, then ; had the laws, the general 
 laws, of God's government been permitted to operate 
 without any interposition in our behalf, the future pun- 
 ishment, for aught we know to the contrary, or have 
 any reason to think, must inevitably have followed, not- 
 withstanding any thing we could have done to prevent 
 it. Now, 
 
 7. V. In this darkness, or this light of nature, call it 
 which yod please, revelation comes in ; confirms every 
 doubting fear which could enter into the pardon taught 
 heart of man concerning the future unpre- b>' ■"^^^'^''on. 
 vented consequence of wickedness ; supposes the world 
 t'> be in a state of ruin ; (a supposition which seems the 
 rery ground of the Christian dispensation, and which, if 
 not provable by reason, yet it is in nowise contrary to 
 it;) teaches us, too, that the rules of divine goveinment 
 are such as not to admit of pardon immediately and di- 
 rectly upon repentance, or by the sole efficacy of it: 
 
 but then teaches at the same time, what nature might 
 17 
 
258 Analogy of Relkuon. [Part II. 
 
 justly have hoped, that the moral government of the uni- 
 verse was not so rigid, but that there was room for an in- 
 terposition to avert the fatal consequence of vice ; which, 
 therefore, by this means, does admit of pardon. Reve- 
 lation teaches us, that the unknown laws of God's more 
 general government, no less than the particular laws b) 
 which we experience he governs us at present, ai j com- 
 passionate, (page 252, etc.,) as well as good, in the more 
 general notion of goodness ; and that he hath mercifully 
 provided that there should be an interposition to pre- 
 vent the destruction of human kind, whatever that de- 
 struction unprevented would have been. " God so loved 
 the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that who- 
 soever believeth," not, to be sure, in a speculative, but 
 in a practical sense, " that whosoever believeth in him 
 should not perish," (John iii, 16;) gave his Son in the 
 same way of goodness to the world as he affords particu- 
 lar persons the friendly assistance of their fellow- crea- 
 tures, when, without it, their temporal ruin would be 
 the certain consequence of their follies; in the same 
 way of goodness, I say, though in a transcendent and 
 infinitely higher degree. And the Son of God " loved 
 us, and gave himself for us," with a love which he him- 
 self compares to that of human friendship ; though, in 
 this case, all comparisons must fall infinitely short of 
 . the thing intended to be illustrated by them. He inter- 
 posed in such a manner as was necessary and effectual 
 to prevent that execution of justice upon sinners which 
 God had appointed should otherwise have been exccut - 
 ed upon them : or in such a manner, as to prevent that 
 punishment from actually following, which, according 
 to the general laws of divine government, must have 
 followed the sins of the world, had it not been for such 
 interposition.* 
 
 ♦ It cannot, I suppose, be imagined, even by the most cursory read- 
 er, that it is. in any sort, affirmed, or implied, in any thing said in 
 
Chap. V.] Appointment of a Mediator. 259 
 
 If any thing here said should appear, upon first 
 thought, inconsistent with divine goodness, a second, I 
 am persuaded, will entirely remove that ap- objection, is 
 pearance. For were we to suppose the j^ K^^lge 
 constitution of things to be such as that the **^^' 
 whole creation must have perished, had it not been for 
 somewhat which God bad appointed should be in order 
 to prevent that ruin ; even this supposition would not be 
 inconsistent, in any degree, with the most absolutely 
 perfect goodness. But still it may be thought that this 
 whole manner of treating the subject before us supposes 
 mankind to be naturally in a very strange state. And truly 
 so it does. But it is not Christianity which has put U9 
 into this state. Whoever will consider the manifold 
 miseries and the extreme wickedness of the world ; that 
 the best have great wrongnesses within themselves, 
 which they complain of, and endeavor to amend ; but 
 that the generality grow more profligate and corrupt 
 
 this chapter, that none can have the benefit of the general redemp- 
 tion, but such as have the advantage of being made acquainted witl 
 it in the present life. But it may be needful to mention, that severa 
 questions, which have been brought into the subject before us, ana 
 determined, are not in the least entered into here ; questions which 
 have been, I fear, rashly determined, and perhaps with equal rash- 
 ness, contrary ways. For instance : Whether God could have saved 
 the world by <>ther means than the death of Christ, consistently with 
 the general laws of his government? And, had not Christ come into 
 the world, what would have been the future condition of the bette» 
 sort of men ; thi)se just persons over the face of the earth, for whom 
 Manasses, in his prayer,* asserts repentance was not appointed ? The 
 meaning of the first of these questions is greatly ambiguous * and 
 neither of them can properly be answered without going upon that 
 infinitely aosurd supposition, that we know the whole of the case. 
 And perhaps, the very inquiry, What would have folIow3d if God 
 had not done as he has ? may have in it some very great impropriety ; 
 and ought not to be carried on any further than is necessary to help 
 our partial and inadequate conception of things. 
 
 * The Prayer of Manasses is one of the apocryphal books of the OM TestatnenI 
 * hich next preoe<lo» '• Marcabees," 
 
26o Analogy of Relfgion. [Part IT 
 
 with age : that heathen moralists thought the present 
 state to be a state of punishment; and what might be 
 added, that the earth, our habitation, has the appear- 
 ance of being a ruin ; whoever, I say, will consider all 
 these, and sonie other obvious things, will think he has 
 little reason to object against the Scripture account, that 
 mankind is in a state of degradation ; against this being 
 the fact; how difficult soever he may think it to account 
 for, or even to form a distinct conception of, the occa- 
 sions and circumstances of it. But that the crime of 
 our first parents was the occasion of our being placed in 
 a m.ore disadvantageous condition, is a thing throughout, 
 and particularly analogous to what we see, in the daily 
 course of natural providence ; as the recovery of the 
 world, by the interposition of Christ, has been shown to 
 be so in general. 
 
 8. VI. The particular manner in which Christ inter- 
 posed in the redemption of the world, or his office as 
 Mediator, in the largest sense, between God 
 
 How Christ in- ' . ° , 
 
 terposes as a a7ui viaji^ IS thus represented to us in the 
 
 mediator, r^ • ^^ tt • i i- i r \ i i »» *f. 
 
 Scripture : He is the light of the world ; * 
 the revealer of the will of God in the most eminent 
 sense : he is a propitiatory sacrifice ;t the " Lamb of 
 God;" I and as he voluntarily offered himself up, he is 
 styled our High-priest. § And, which seems of peculiar 
 weight, he is described beforehand, in the Old Testa- 
 ment, under, the same characters of a priest, and an ex- 
 piatory victim.il And whereas it is objected, that all 
 this is merely by way of allusion to the sacrifices of the 
 Mosaic law, the apostle, on the contrary, affirms, that 
 
 ♦ John i, and viii, 12, 
 
 f Rom. ili, 25, and v, ii ; x Cor. v, 7 ; Eph. v, 2 ; i John ii, 2 
 
 Matt, xxvi, 28. 
 
 \ John i, 29, 36, and throughout the Book of Revelation. 
 § Throui^hout the Epistle to the Hebrews. 
 I I'^a liii ; Dnn. ix, 24 ; Psa. ex, a. 
 
Chap. V.j Appointment of a Mediaior. 261 
 
 " the law was a shadow of good things to come, and not 
 the very image of the things," (Heb. x, i ;) and that the 
 "priests that offer gifts according to the law — serve un- 
 to the example and shadow of heavenly things as Moses 
 was admonished of God when he was about to make 
 the tabernacle. For see," saith he, *' that thou make all 
 *hings according to the pattern showed to thee in the 
 mount," (Heb. viii, 4, 5 ;) that is, the Levitical priest- 
 hood was a shadow of the priesthood of Ci.iist, in like 
 manner as the tabernacle made by Moses was accord- 
 ing to that showed him in the mount. The priesthood 
 of Christ, and the tabernacle in the mount, were the orig- 
 inals : of the former of which, the Levitical priesthood 
 was a type; and of the latter, the tabernacle made by 
 Moses was a copy. The doctrine of this epistle then 
 plainly is, that the legal sacrifices were allusions to the 
 Igreat and final atonement to be made by the blood of 
 /Christ; and not that this was an allusion to those. Nor 
 can any thing be more express and determinate than the 
 following passage : " It is not possible that the blood of 
 bulls and of goats should take away sin. Wherefore, 
 when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and 
 offering " — that is, of bulls and of goats — " thou wouldst 
 not, but a body hast thou prepared me — Lo, I come to 
 do thy will, O God. By which will we are sanctified, 
 through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for 
 all." Heb. x, 4, 5, 7, 9, 10, And to add one passage 
 more of the like kind : " Christ was once offered to bear 
 the sins of many ; and unto them that look for him shall 
 he appear the second time, without sin;" that is, with- 
 out bearing sin, as he did at his first coming, by being 
 an offering for it ; without having our iniquities again 
 laid upon him, without being any more a bin-offering : — 
 * Unto them that look for him shall he appear the sec- 
 ond time, without sin unto salvation." Heb. ix, 28. Nor 
 do the inspired writers at all confine themselves to this 
 
262 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 manner of speaking concerning tiie satisfaction of Christ, 
 but declare an efficacy in what he did and suffered for 
 us additional to, and beyond mere instruction, examj.le, 
 and government, in great variety of expression : " Th.it 
 Jesus should die for that nation," the Jews, " and not 
 for that nation only, but that also," plainly by the elf-- 
 cacy of his death, " he should gather together in one tl c 
 children of God that were scattered abroad:""* ^'^at 
 "he suffered for sins, the just for the unjust :"t that 
 "he gave his life — ^^himself — a ransom:" J; that "we are 
 bought — bought with a price :"§ that "he redeemed us 
 with his blood : redeemed us from the curse of the 
 law, being made a curse for us :" || that " he is our ad- 
 vocate, intercessor, and propitiation:"^ that "he was 
 made perfect (or consummate) through sufferings; and 
 being thus made perfect, he became the author of salva- 
 tion :"** that " God was in Christ, reconciling the world 
 to himself, by the death of his Son by the cross ; not 
 imputing their trespasses unto them:"ff and, lastly, 
 that "through death he destroyed him that had the 
 power of death." H Christ, then, having thus " humbled 
 himself, and become obedient to death, even the death 
 of the cross, God also hath highly exalted him, and giv- 
 en him a name which is above every name ; hath given 
 all things into his hands; hath committed all judgment 
 unto him ; that all men should honor the Son, even as 
 they honor the Father." §§ For, "worthy is the Lamb 
 that was slain, to receive power, and riches, and wisdom, 
 
 * John xi, 51, 52. f I Pet. iii, 18. 
 
 X Matt. XX, 28 ; Mark x, 45 ; I Tim. ii, 6. 
 § 2 Pet. ii, I ; Rev. xiv, 4 ; i Cor. vi, 20. 
 II I Pet. i, 19 ; Rev. v, 9 ; Gal. iii, 13. 
 
 1' Heb. vii, 25 ; i John ii, i, 2. ** Heb. ii, 10; t, 9. 
 
 f f 2 Cor. V, 19 ; Rom. v, 10 ; Eph. ii, 16. 
 
 if:}: Heb. ii, 14. See also a remarkable passage in the bock of Job, 
 >-%'iii, 24. 
 
 ^ Phil. ii. 8. 9 ; John iii, 35, and v. 22, 23. 
 
Chap. V.I Appointment of a Mediator. 263 
 
 and strength, and honor, and glory, and blessing! And 
 every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, heard 
 I saying, Blessing, and honor, and glory, and power, be 
 'into him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the 
 Lamb, for ever and ever." Rev. v, 12, 13. 
 
 9. These passages of Scripture seem to comprehend 
 and express the chief parts of Christ's office, as mediator 
 between God and man, so far, I mean., as the nature of 
 this his office is revealed ; and it is usually treated of by 
 divines under three heads. 
 
 First. He was, by way of eminehce, the Prophet : 
 '* that Prophet that should come into the christasa 
 world," (John vi, 14,) to declare the divine '*<*p^^*- 
 will. He published anew the law of nature which men 
 had corrupted; and the very knowledge of which, to 
 some degree, was lost among them. He taught man- 
 kind — taught us authoritatively — to "live soberly, right- 
 eously, and godly, in this present world," in expectation 
 of the future judgment of God. He confirmed the truth 
 of this moral system of nature, and gave us additional 
 evidence of it, the evidence of testimony. (Page 195.) 
 He distinctly revealed the manner in which God would 
 be worshiped, the efficacy of repentanc.e, and the re- 
 wards and punishments of a future life. Thus he was a 
 prophet, in a sense in which no other ever was. To 
 which is to be added, that he set us a perfect '* example 
 that we should follow his steps." 
 
 10. Secondly. He has a " kingdom, which is not of this 
 world." He founded a Church, to be to Christ f^ 
 mankind a standing memorial of religion ^^^" 
 
 and invitation to it; which he promised to be with ai- 
 wa}s, even to the end. He exercises an invisible gov- 
 ernment over it, himself, and by his Spirit ; over tJjat 
 part of it which is militant here on earth, a government 
 of discipline, "for the perfecting of the saints, for the 
 edifying of his body ; till we all come in rhe unity of the 
 
264 Analogy of Religion. IPar7 fl 
 
 faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a 
 perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the dull- 
 ness of Christ:" (Eph. iv, 12, 13.) Of this Church, all 
 persons scattered over the world, who live in obedience 
 to his laws, are members. For these he is gotit to i)re- 
 pare a place ^ and will come again to receive them unto /ii?n' 
 'ielfy that where he is^ there they may be also ; and reign 
 with him for ever and ever, (John xiv, 2, 3 ; Rev. iii, 
 21, and xi, 15;) and likewise " to take vengeance on 
 them that know not God and obey not his gospel." 
 2 Thess. i, 8. 
 
 Against these parts of Christ's office I find no objec- 
 tions but what are fully obviated in the beginning of this 
 chapter. 
 
 11. Lastly. Christ offered himself a propitiatory sacri- 
 christ as a fice, and made atonement for the sins of the 
 "®^^* world ; which is mentioned last, in regard 
 
 to what is objected against it. Sacrifices of expiation 
 were commanded the Jews, and obtained among most 
 other nations, from tradition, whose original probably 
 was revelation. And they were continually repeated 
 both occasionally and at the returns of stated times, 
 and made up great part of the external religion of man- 
 kind. "But now once in the end of the world Christ 
 appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself." 
 Heb. ix, 26. And this sacrifice was in the highest de- 
 gree, and with the most extensive influence, of that effi- 
 cacy for obtaining pardon of sin which the heatheng 
 may be supposed to have thought their sacrifices to 
 have been, and which the Jewish sacrifices really were, 
 in some degree, and with regard to some persons. 
 
 12. How, and in what particular way, it had this effi- 
 How (Jhrist's cacy, there are not wanting persons who 
 
 dous^'s'nofe^- ^avc endeavorcd to explain ; but I do not 
 plained. f^^^^ ^|^^j. ^|^g Scripture has explained it. 
 
 We seem to be very much in the dark concerning the 
 
Chap. V.] Appointment of a Mediator. 265 
 
 • 
 manner in which the ancients understood atonement to 
 
 be made, that is, pardon to be obtained by sacrifices. 
 And if the Scripture has, as surely it has, left this mat- 
 ter of the satisfaction of Christ mysterious, left some- 
 what in it unrevealed, all conjectures about it must be, 
 if not evidently absurd, yet at least uncertain. Nor has 
 my one reason to complain for want of further informa- 
 tion, unless he can show his claim to, it. 
 
 Some have endeavored to explain the efficacy of what 
 Christ has done and suffered for Us, beyond what the 
 Scripture has authorized ; others, probably because they 
 could not explain it, have been for taking it away, and 
 confining his office as Redeemer of the world to his in- 
 struction, example, and government of the Church. 
 Whereas, the doctrine of the gospel appears to be, not 
 only that he taught the efficacy of repentance, but ren- 
 dered it of the efficacy which it is, by what he did and 
 suffered for us : that he obtained for us the benefit of 
 having our repentance accepted unto eternal life : not 
 only that he revealed to sinners, that they were in a 
 capacity of salvation, and how they might obtain it ; but 
 moreover, that he put them into this capacity of salva- 
 tion by what he did and suffered for them ; put us into 
 a capacity of escaping future punishment, and obtaining 
 future happiness. And it is our wisdom thankfully to 
 accept the benefit, by performing the conditions upon 
 which it is offered on our part, without disputing how it 
 ^vas procured on his. For, 
 
 -3. VII. Since we neither know by what means pun- 
 ish. nent in a future state would have followed wicked- 
 ness in this; nor in what manner it would objections 
 have been inflicted, had it not been pre- EKdJda^ 
 vented ; nor all the reasons why its inflic- ^^^' 
 tion would have been needful ; nor the particular na- 
 ture of that state of happiness which Christ is gone to 
 •Prepare for hi« disciples; and since we are ignorant 
 
266 Analogy of Religion'. I Pa in IF. 
 
 how far any thing which we could do would, alone and of 
 itself, have been effectual to prevent that punishment to 
 which we were obnoxious, and recover that happiness 
 which we had forfeited ; it is most evident we are not 
 judges, antecedently to revelation, whether a n:c "'vito'" 
 was or was not necessary to obtain those ends; to prt^- 
 vent that future punishment, and bring mankind to the 
 «* final happiness of ^their nature. And for the very same 
 reasons, upon supposition of the necessity of a mediator, 
 we are no more judges, antecedently to revelation, of 
 the whole nature of his office, or the several parts of 
 which it consists : of what was fit and requisite to be 
 assigned him, in order to accomplish the ends of divine 
 Providence in the appointment. And from hence it 
 follows, that to object against the expediency or useful- 
 ness of particular things revealed to have been done or 
 suffered by him, because we do not see how they were 
 conducive to those ends, is highly absurd. Yet nothing 
 is more common to be met with than this absurdity. 
 But if it be acknowledged beforehand that we are not 
 judges in the case, it is evident that no objection can, 
 with any shadow of reason, be urged against any partic- 
 ular part of Christ's mediatorial office revealed in Script- 
 ure till it can be shown positively not to be requisite or 
 conducive to the ends proposed to be accomplished ; or 
 that it is in itself unreasonable. 
 
 14. And there is one objection made against the sat- 
 isfaction of Christ, which looks to be of this positive 
 «v. , r. . kind : that the doctrine of his being appoint- 
 
 Objection. God . o r r 
 
 represented as ed to suffer for the sins of the world repre- 
 
 tausing the in- ^^ - , . . . 
 
 flocent to suffer sents God as bcmg indifferent whether he 
 
 «nth the guilty. . , , , . , ., ._ _ 
 
 punished the innocent or the guilty. Now 
 from the foregoing observations we may see the extreme 
 slightness of all such objections, and (though it is most 
 certain all who make them do not see the consequence) 
 that they conclude altogether as much against God's 
 
Jhap, V ] Appointment of a Mediator. 267 
 
 >\ hole original constitution of nature, and the whole daily 
 course of divine Providence, in the government of the 
 world, that is, against the whole scheme of theism and 
 the whole notion of religion, as against Christianity. 
 For the world is a constitution, or system, whose parts 
 have a mutual reference to each other ; and there is a 
 scheme of things gradually carrying on, called the 
 course of nature, to the carrying on of which God has 
 appointed us in various ways to contribute. And when, 
 in the daily course of natural providence, it is appointed 
 that innocent people should suffer for the faults of the 
 guilty, this is liable to the very same objection as the 
 instance we are now considering. The infinitely great- 
 er importance of that appointment of Christianity which 
 is objected against, does not hinder, but it may be, as it 
 plainly is, an appointment of the very same kind with 
 what the world affords us daily examples of. Nay, if 
 there were any force at all in the objection, it would be 
 stronger, in one respect, against natural providence than 
 against Christianity ; because under the former we are 
 in many cases commanded, and even necessitated, 
 whether we will or not, to suffer for the faults of others; 
 whereas the sufferings of Christ were voluntary. 
 
 The world's being under the righteous government of 
 God does indeed imply that finally, and upon the whole, 
 every one shall receive according to his personal de- 
 serts : and the general doctrine of the whole Scripture 
 is, ihat this shall be the completion of the divine gov- 
 ernment. But during the progress, and for aught we 
 know, even in order to the completion of this moral 
 scheme, vicarious punishments maybe fit, and absolute- 
 ly necessary. Men, by their follies, run themselves into 
 extreme distress ; into difficulties which would be abso- 
 lutely fatal to them, were it not for the interposition and 
 assistance of others. God commands by the law of na- 
 ture that we afford them this assistance, in many cases 
 
26S Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 where we cannot do it without very great pains, and 
 labor, and sufferings to ourselves. And we see in what 
 variety of ways one person's sufferings contribute to tlie 
 relief of another ; and how, or by what particular m.-ans, 
 this comes to pass, or follows, from the constitution and 
 laws of nature, which come under our notice: and be. 
 ing familiarized to it, men are not shocked with it. So 
 tnat the reason of their insisting upon objections of the 
 foregoing kind against the satisfaction of Christ is either 
 that they do not consider God's settled and uniform ap- 
 pointments as his appointments at all, or else they for- 
 get that vicarious punishment is a providential appoint- 
 ment of every day's experience : and then, from their 
 being unacquainted with the more general laws of nature, 
 or divine government over the world, and not seeing 
 how the sufferings of Christ could contribute to the 
 redemption of it, unless by arbitrary and tyrannical will, 
 they conclude his sufferings could not contribute to it 
 any other way. Aqd yet, what has been often alleged 
 in justification of this doctrine, even from the apparent 
 natural tendency of this method of our redemption — its 
 tendency to vindicate the authority of God's laws, and 
 deter his creatures from sin ; this has never yet been 
 answered, and is, I think, plainly unanswerable : though 
 I am far from thinking it an account of the whole of the 
 case. But without taking this into consideration, it 
 abundantly appears, from the observations above made, 
 that this objection is not an objection against Christian- 
 ity, but against the whole general constitution of nature 
 And if it were to be considered as an objection against 
 Christianity, or, considering it as it is, an objection 
 against the constitution of nature, it amounts to no more 
 in conclusion than this, that a divine appointment can- 
 not be necessary or expedient, because the objector 
 does not discern it to be so; though he must own that 
 the nature of the case is such as renders him incapabl- 
 
Chap. V.l Appointment of a Mediator. 269 
 
 of judging whether it be so or not; or of seeing it to be 
 necessary though it were so. 
 
 15. It is indeed a matter of great patience to reason- 
 able men to find people arguing in this manner, object 
 ing against the credibility of such particular objectioDf 
 things revealed in Scripture, that they do ^"ralfcJJJSirea- 
 not see the necessity or expediency of them. »<*°^^^®- 
 
 For though it is highly right, and the most pious exer- 
 cise of our understanding, to inquire with due reverence 
 into the ends and reasons of God's dispensations; vet 
 uhen those reasons are concealed, to argue, from our 
 ignorance, that such dispensations cannot be from God, 
 is infinitely absurd. The presumption of this kind of 
 objections seems almost lost in the folly of them. And 
 the folly of them is yet greater when they are urged, as 
 usually they are, against things in Christianity analogous, 
 or like, to those natural dispensations of Providence which 
 are matter of experience. Let reason be kept to ; and if 
 any part of the Scripture account of the redemption of 
 the world by Christ can be shown to be really contrary 
 to it, let the Scripture, in the name of God, be given up ; 
 but let not such poor creatures as we go on objecting 
 against an infinite scheme, that we do not see the neces- 
 sity or usefulness of all its parts, and call this reason- 
 ing; and, which still further heightens the absurdity in 
 the present case, parts which we are not actively con- 
 cerned in. For it may be worth mentioning, 
 
 16. Lastly. That not only the reason of the thing, but 
 the whole analogy of nature, should teach us not to ex- 
 pect to have the like information concern- Equal infon* 
 ing the Divine conduct as concerning our Ih^e^DTdnTcon- 
 own duty. God instructs us by experi- dllty no°t'^io''S 
 ence, (for it is not reason, but experience, ^-"^i'^^^^^- 
 which instru,;ts us,) what good or bad consequences 
 will foll.)\v from our acting in such and such manners; 
 and bv tliis he directs us how wc are to behave 
 
2/0 Analogy of Religiox. [Pai^t IL 
 
 ourselves. But, though we are sufficiently instructed 
 for the common purposes of life, yet it is but an almost 
 infinitely small part of natural providence which we are 
 at all let into. The case is the same with regard to rev- 
 elation. The doctrine of a Mediator between God and 
 man, against which it is objected that the expediency 
 of some things in it is not understood, relates only to 
 what was done on God's part in the appointment, and 
 on the Mediator's in the execution of it. For what is 
 required of us, in consequence of this gracious dispen- 
 sation, is another subject, in which none can complain 
 for want of information. The constitution of the world 
 and God's natural government over it is all mystery, 
 as much as the Christian dispensation. Yet under the 
 first, he has given men all things pertaining to life ; and 
 under the other, all things pertaining unto godliness. 
 And it may be added, that there is nothing hard to be 
 accounted for in any of the common precepts of Chris- 
 tianity ; though if there were, surely a Divine command 
 is abundantly sufficient to lay us under the strongest 
 obligations to obedience. But the fact is, that the rea- 
 sons of all the Christian precepts are evident. Positive 
 institutions are manifestly necessary to keep up and 
 propagate religion among mankind. And our duty to 
 Christ, the internal and external worship of him, this 
 part of the religion of the gospel manifestly arises out 
 of what he has done and suffered, his authority and 
 dominion, and the relation which he is revealed to stand 
 in to us. (Page 201, etc.) 
 
Chap. VIJ Revelation not Universal. 271 
 
 CHAPTER VI. 
 
 OF THE WANT OF UNIVERSALITY IN REVELATION j 
 AND OF THE SUPPOSED DEFICIENCY IN THE PROOF 
 OF IT. 
 
 IT has been thought by some persons, that if the evi- 
 dence of revelation appears doubtful, this itself 
 turns into a positive argument against it; 
 
 . , ' ■- .. . Objections. 
 
 because it cannot be supposed, that, if it 
 were true, it would be left to subsist upon doubtful evi- 
 dence. And the objection against revelation, from its 
 not being universal, is often insisted upon as of great 
 weight. 
 
 Now the weakness of these opinions may be shown, by 
 observing the suppositions on which they are founded, 
 which are really such as these : — that it cannot be 
 thought God would have bestowed any favor at all upon 
 us, unless in the degree which we think he might, and 
 which, we imagine, would be most to our particular ad- 
 vantage ; and also, that it cannot be thought he would 
 bestow a favor upon any, unless he bestowed the same 
 upon all : suppositions which we find contradicted, 
 not by a few instances in God's natural government 
 of the world, but by the general analogy of nature 
 together. 
 
 2. Persons who speak of the evidence of religion* as 
 doubtful, and of this supposed doubtfulness as a positive 
 argument against it, should be put upon -we act on 
 considering what that evidence, indeed, is, dence^SlI infpi'r- 
 which they act upon with regard to their <^t matters, 
 temporal interests. For it is not only extremely difii- 
 
2/2 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 cult, but in many cases absolutely impossible, to bak nee 
 pleasure and pain, satisfaction and uneasiness, so as to 
 be able to say on which side the overplus is. There are 
 the like difficulties and impossibilities in making the 
 due allowances for a change of temper and taste, for 
 satiety, disgusts, ill health ; any of which render men 
 incapable of enjoying, after they have obtained, wha,t 
 they most eagerly desired. Numberless, too, aie the 
 accidents, besides that one of untimely death, which may • 
 even probably disappoint the best concerted schemes; 
 and strong objections are often seen to lie against them, 
 not to be removed or answered, but which seem over- 
 balanced by reasons on the other side; so as that the 
 certain difficulties and dangers of the pursuit are, by 
 every one, thought justly disregarded, upon account of 
 the appearing greater advantages in case of success, 
 though there be but little probability of it. Lastly. 
 Every one observes our liableness, if we be not upon 
 our guard, to be deceived by the falsehood of men, and 
 the false appearance of things ; and this danger must be 
 greatly increased if there be a strong bias within, sup- 
 pose from indulged passion, to favor the deceit. Hence 
 arises that great uncertainty and doubtfulness of proof, 
 wherein our temporal interest 'really consists ; what are 
 the most probable means of attaining it ; and whether those 
 means will eventually be successful. And numberless 
 instances there are, in the daily course of life, in which „. 
 all men think it reasonable to engage in pursuits, though 
 the probability is greatly against succeeding; and to 
 make such provision for themselves as it is supposable 
 they may have occasion for, though the plain, acknowl- 
 edged probability is, that they never shall. 
 
 3. Then those who think the objection against reve- 
 
 Anaiogy shows lation, from its light not being universal, to 
 
 ver8auiiJfs''So be of weight, should observe that the Author 
 
 ob.ioction. ^f nature, in numberless instances, bestows 
 
Chap. Vr.7 Revelation not Universal. 273 
 
 thai upon some which he does not upon others, who 
 seem equally to stand in need of it. Indeed, he appears 
 to bestow all his gifts, with the most promiscuous varie- 
 ty, among creatures of the same species : health and 
 strength, capacities of prudence and of knowledge, 
 means of improvement, riches, and all external advan- 
 tages. And as there are not any two men found of ex- 
 actly like shape and features, so, it is probable, there are 
 not any two of an exactly like constitution, terjnper, and 
 situation, with regard to the goods and evils of life. 
 Yet, notwithstanding these uncertainties and varieties, 
 God does exercise a natural government over the world ; 
 and there is such a thing as a prudent and imprudent 
 institution of life, with regard to our health and our 
 affairs, under that his natural government. 
 
 As neither the Jewish nor Christian revelation have 
 been universal, and as they have been afforded to a 
 greater or less part of the world, at different times, so 
 likewise, at different times, both revelations have had 
 different degrees of evidence. The Jews who lived dur- 
 ing the succession of prophets, that is, from Moses till 
 after the captivity, had higher evidence of the truth 
 of their religion than those had, who lived in the interval 
 between the last-mentioned period and the coming of 
 Christ. And the first Christians had higher evidence 
 of the miracles wrought in attestation of Christianity 
 than what we have now. They had also a strong pre- 
 sumptive proof of the truth of it, perhaps of much 
 greater force in way of argument than many think, of 
 which we have very little remaining; I mean, the pre- 
 sumptive proof of its truth, from the influence which it 
 had upon the lives of the generality of its professors. 
 And we, or future ages, may possibly have a proof of it 
 \rhich they could not have, from the conformity between 
 the prophetic history and the state of the world, and of 
 
 Christianity. 
 18 
 
^74 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 And further: if we were to suppose the evidence 
 which some have of religion to amount to little more 
 than seeing that it may be true, but that they remain in 
 great doubts and uncertainties about both its evidence 
 and its nature, and great perplexities concerning the 
 rule of life ; others, to have a full conviction of the 
 truth of religion, with a distinct knowledge of their duty 
 and others severally, to have all the intermediate de- 
 grees of religious light and evidence which lie between 
 these two — if we put the case, that for the present it 
 was intended revelation should be no more than a small 
 light in the midst of a world greatly overspread, notwith- 
 standing it, with ignorance and darkness ; that certain 
 glimmerings of this light should extend, and be directed, 
 to remote distances, in such a manner as that those who 
 really partook of it should not discern from whence it 
 originally came ; that some, in a nearer situation to it, 
 should have its light obscured, and, in different ways 
 and degrees, intercepted; and that others should be 
 placed within its clearer influence, and be much more 
 enlivened, cheered, and directed by it; but yet, that 
 even to these it should be no more than a light shining 
 in a dark place : all this would be perfectly uniform, and 
 of a piece with the conduct of providence in the distri- 
 bution of its other blessings. If the fact of the case 
 really were, that some have received no light at all from 
 the Scripture ; as many ages and countries in the hea- 
 then world : that others, though they have, by means of 
 it, liad essential or natural religion enforced upon their 
 ( onsciences, yet have never had the genuine Scripture 
 revelation, with its real evidence, proposed to their con- 
 sideration; and the ancient Persians and modern Mo- 
 hammedans may possibly be instances of people in a situ- 
 ation, somewhat like to this: that others, though they 
 have had the Scripture laid before them as of divine 
 revelation, yet have had it with the system and evidence 
 
Chap. VI.] Revelation not Universal, 275 
 
 of Christianity so interpolated, the system so corrupted, 
 the evidence so blended with false miracles, as to leave 
 the mind in the utmost doubtfulness and uncertainty 
 about the whole; which may be the state of some 
 thoughtful men in most of those nations who call them- 
 selves Christian ; and lastly, that others have had Chris- 
 tianity offered to them in its genuine simplicity, ai.d 
 with its proper evidence, as persons in countries and 
 Churches of civil and of Christian liberty ; but, however, 
 that even these persons are left in great ignorance in 
 many respects, and have by no means light afforded 
 them enough to satisfy their curiosity, but only to regu- 
 late their life, to teach them their duty, and encourage 
 them in the careful discharge of it ; I say, if we were to 
 suppose this somewhat of a general true account of the 
 degrees of moral and religious light and evidence, which 
 were intended to be afforded mankind, and of what has 
 actually been and is their situation in their moral and 
 religious capacity, there would be nothing in all this 
 ignorance, doubtfulness, and uncertainty — in all these 
 varieties and supposed disadvantages of some in com- 
 parison of others, respecting religion — but may be par- 
 alleled by manifest analogies in the natural dispensa- 
 tions of providence at present, and considering ourselves 
 merely in our temporal capacity. 
 
 4. Nor is there any thing shocking in all this, or which 
 would seem to bear hard upon the moral ad»ninistration 
 in nature, if we vvould really keep in mind ah to be judged 
 that every on^ shall be dealt equitably with ; Sr knowi^dgo 
 instead of forgetting this, or explaining it a'^'i ability. 
 away, after it is acknowledged in words. All shadow of 
 injustice, and indeed all harsh appearances, in this vari- 
 ous economy of providence, would be lost, if we would 
 keep in mind that every merciful allowance shall be 
 made, and no more be required of any one than what 
 uvi^ht have l).-'jn e(juitably expected of him, from the 
 
276 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 circumstances in which he was placed; and not what 
 might have been expected, had he been placed in other 
 circumstances : that is, in Scripture language, that every 
 man shall be accepted " according to what he had, not 
 according to what he had not." 2 Cor. viii, 12. This, 
 however, doth not by any means imply that all persons 
 condition here is equally advantageous with respect to 
 futurity. And Providence's designing to place some in 
 greater darkness with respect to religious knowledge, is 
 no more a reason why they should not endeavor to get 
 out of that darkness, and others to bring them out of it, 
 than why ignorant and slow people, in matters of othei 
 knowledge, should not endeavor to learn, or should not 
 be instructed. 
 
 5. It is not unreasonable to suppose, that the same 
 wise and good principle, whatever it was, vv^hich dis- 
 
 ^. . posed the Author of nature to make differ- 
 
 Diversity m ^ _ 
 
 knowieds-e not ent kinds and orders of creatures, disposed 
 
 more unreason- . . , . , 
 
 able than ill ca- him also to placc creatures of like kinds 
 
 pacities. ..... . . . . . 
 
 in dirferent situations; and that the same 
 principle which disposed him to make creatures of dif- 
 ferent moral capacities, disposed him also to place crea- 
 tures of like moral capacities in different religious situ- 
 ations : and even the same creatures, in different periods 
 of their being. And the account or reason of this, is 
 also most probably the account why the constitution of 
 things is such as that creatures of moral natures or ca- 
 pacities, for a considerable part of that duration in 
 which they are living agents, are not at all subjects of 
 morality and religion ; but grow up to be so, and grow 
 up to be so more and more, gradually from childhood 
 to mature age. 
 
 6. What, in particular, is the account or reason of 
 The reason of thesc things, we must be greatly in the dark 
 
 these things is -^ i ^i ^ i Ti.^i 
 
 that of our \^- were It only that we know so very nttle even 
 
 r'>ranc«. lelative , ,^ ^ . ^ 
 
 i4) them. of our own case. Our present state mav 
 
Cjiap. VI.] Revelation not Univeksal. 277 
 
 possibly be the consequence of somewhat past, which 
 we are wholly ignorant of; as it has a reference to some- 
 what to come, of which we know scarce any more than 
 is necessary for practice. A system or constitution, in 
 its notion, implies variety : and so complicated a one 
 as this world, very great variety. So that were revela- 
 tion universal, yet from men's different capacities of un- 
 derstanding, from the different lengths of their lives, 
 their different educations, and other external circum- 
 stances, and from their difference of temper and bodily 
 constitution ; their religious situations would be widely 
 different, and the disadvantage of some in comparison of 
 others, perhaps, altogether as much as at present. And 
 the true account, whatever it be, why mankind, or such 
 a part of mankind, are placed in this condition of igno- 
 rance, must be supposed also the true account of our 
 further ignorance in not knowing the reasons why, or 
 whence it is, that they are placed in this condition. But 
 the following practical reflections may deserve the seri- 
 ous consideration of those persons who think the cir- 
 cumstances of mankind, or their own, in the fore-men- 
 tioned respects, a ground of complaint. 
 
 First. The evidence of religion not appearing obvious, 
 may constitute one particular part of some men's trial in 
 the religious sense : as it eives scope for a 
 
 * . . . ° ^ . This want of 
 
 virtuous exercise, or vicious neglect, of their Ui^bt a part of 
 
 . . . . . our triaL 
 
 understanding, in examining or not examin- 
 ing into that evidence. There seems no possible reason 
 to be given why we may not be in a state of moral pro- 
 [)ation with regard to the exercise of our understanding 
 upon the subject of religion, as we are with regard to 
 our behavior in common affairs. The former is as much 
 a thing within our power and choice as the latter. And 
 I suppose it is to be laid down for certain, that the same 
 chararter, the sjime inward principle, which, after a man 
 !s convinced of the truth of religion, r.^nde 'S him obc- 
 
278 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 dient to the precepts of it, would, were he not thus con- 
 vinced, set him about an examination of it, upon its 
 system and evidence being offered to his thoughts ; 
 and that in the latter state, his examination would be 
 with an impartiality, seriousness, and solicitude, propor- 
 tionable to what his obedience is in the former And as 
 inattention, negligence, want of all serious concern, about 
 a matter of such a nature and such importance, when of- 
 fered to men's consideration, is, before a distinct con- 
 viction of its truth, as real immoral depravity and disso- 
 luteness as neglect of religious practice after such con- 
 viction ; so active solicitude about it, and fair impartial 
 consideration of its evidence before such conviction, is as 
 really an exercise of a morally right temper as is religious 
 practice after. Thus, that religion is not intuitively true, 
 but a matter of deduction and inference; that a convic- 
 tion of its truth is not forced upon every one, but left 
 to be, by some, collected with heedful attention to 
 premises : this as much constitutes religious probation — 
 as much affords sphere, scope, opportunity, for right and 
 wrong behavior — as any thing whatever does. And their 
 manner of treating this subject, when laid before them, 
 shows what is in their heart, and is an exertion of it. 
 
 8. Secondly. It appears to be a thing as evident, though 
 it is not so much attended to, that if, upon considera- 
 Doubtfui e^n- tion of religion, the evidence of it should 
 fnTiS pro" seem to any persons doubtful, in the highest 
 bation. supposable degree ; even this doubtful evi- 
 
 dence will, however, put them into a ge7ieral stai: ^f proba- 
 tion^ in the moral and religious sense. For, suppose a man 
 to be really in doubt whether such a person had not done 
 nim the greatest favor; or, whether his whole temporal 
 interest did not depend upon that person; no one who 
 had any sense of gratitude and of prudence could possi- 
 bly consider himself in the same situation, with regard 
 to such persons, as if he had no such doubt. In truth, 
 
Cir.vp. VI. J Revelation not Universal. 279 
 
 it is as just to say that certainty and doubt are the same 
 as to say the situations now mentioned would leave a 
 man as entirely at liberty, in point of gratitude or pru- 
 denje, as he would be were he certain he had received 
 no favor from such person, or that he no way depended 
 upon him And thus, though the evidence of religion 
 which is afforded to some men should be little mere 
 tlian that they are given to see the system of Christian- 
 ity, or religion in general, to be supposable and credible, 
 this ought in all reason to beget a serious practical ap- 
 prehension that it may be true. And even this will 
 afford matter of exercise, for religious suspense and de- 
 liberation, for moral resolution and self-government; 
 because the apprehension that religion may be true, 
 does as really lay men under obligations as a full con- 
 viction that it is true. It gives occasion and motives to 
 consider further the important subject ; to preserve at- 
 tentively upon their minds a general implicit sense that 
 they may be under divine moral government, an awful 
 solicitude about religion, whether natural or revealed. 
 Such apprehension ought to turn men's eyes to every 
 degree of new light which may be had, from whatever 
 side it comes, and induce them to refrain, in the mean 
 time, from all immoralities, and live in the conscientious 
 practice of every common virtue. Especially are they 
 bound to keep at the greatest distance from all dissolute 
 profaneness, for this the very nature of the case for- 
 bids ; and to treat with highest reverence a matter upon 
 which their own whole interest and being, and the fate 
 of nature, depends. This behavior, and an active en- 
 fleavor to maintain within themselves this temper, is thc- 
 business, the duty, and the wisdom of those persons 
 {\^ho complain of the doubtfulness of religion ; is what 
 they are under the most proper obligations to; and such 
 behavior is an exertion of, and has a tendency to im- 
 prove in them, that character which the practice of all 
 
28o Analogy of Religion. [Part IT 
 
 the several duties of religion, from a full conviction of 
 its truth, is an exertion of and has a tendency to improve, 
 in others ; others, I say, to whom God has afforded such 
 conviction. Nay, considering the infinite importance of 
 religion, revealed as well as natural, I think it may be 
 said in general that whoever will weigh the matter thor- 
 oughly, may see there is not near so much difference as 
 is commonly imagined between what ought in reason to. 
 be the rule of life to those persons who are fully con- 
 vinced of its truth, and to those who have only a serious 
 doubting apprehension that it may be true. Their hopes, 
 and fears, and obligations will be in various degrees; but, 
 as the subject-matter of their hopes and fears is the same, 
 so the subject-matter of their obligations, what they are 
 bound to do and to refrain from, is not so very unlike. 
 
 9. It is to be observed, further, that from a character 
 
 of understanding, or a situation of influence in the world, 
 
 some persons have it in their power to do 
 
 Religious doubt . ^ . , , , . 
 
 does not lessen mfinitely more harm or good by setting an 
 
 responsibility. , _ . , j j- 
 
 example of profaneness and avowed disre- 
 gard to all religion, or, on the contrary, of a serious, 
 though perhaps doubting, apprehension of its truth, and 
 of a reverend regard to it under this doubtfulness, than 
 they can do by acting well or ill in all the common in- 
 tercourses among mankind ; and consequently they are 
 most highly accountable for a behavior which they 
 may easily foresee is of such importance, and in which 
 there is most plainly a right and a wrong ; even admit- 
 ting the evidence of religion to be as doubtful as is 
 pretended. 
 
 10. The ground of these observations, and that which 
 renders them just and true, is that doubting necessarily 
 Doubtimpiies implies some degree of evidence for that of 
 evidence. which wc doubt. For no person would be 
 
 in doubt concerning the truth of a number of facts 
 so and so circumstanced which should accidentally come 
 
Chap. VI.] Revelation not Universal. 281 
 
 into his thoughts, and o^ which he had no evidence at all. 
 And though, in the case of an even chance, and where 
 consequently we were in doubt, we should in common 
 language say that we had no evidence at all for either 
 side ; yet that situation of things which renders it an 
 even chance and no more, that such an event will hap- 
 pen, renders this case equivalent to all others, where 
 there is such evidence on both sides of a question (In- 
 troduction) as leaves the mind in doubt concerning the 
 truth. Indeed, in all these cases there is no more evi- 
 dence on the one side than on the other; but there is 
 (what is equivalent to) much more for either than for 
 uhe truth of a number of facts which come into one's 
 thoughts at random. And thus, in all these cases, doubt 
 as much presupposes evidence, lower degrees of evi- 
 dence, as belief presupposes higher, and certainty high- 
 er still. Any one who wilT a little attend to the nature 
 of evidence, will easily carry this observation on, and 
 see that between no evidence at all, and that degree of 
 it which affords ground of doubt, there are as many in- 
 termediate degrees as there are between that degree 
 which is the ground of doubt, and demonstration. And 
 though we have not faculties to distinguish these de- 
 grees of evidence with any sort of exactness, yet in pro- 
 portion as they are discerned, they ought to influence 
 our p'-actice. For it is as real an imperfection in the 
 mora, character not to be influenced in practice by a 
 lowei degree of evidence when discerned, as it is in the 
 understanding not to discern it. And as, in all subjects 
 which men consider, they discern the lower as well as 
 the higher degrees of evidence, proportionably to their 
 capacity of understanding ; so, in practical subjects, they 
 are influenced in practice by the lower as well as higher 
 degrees of it, proportionably to their fairness and hon- 
 esty. And as in proportion to defects in the under- 
 standing, men are unapt to see lower degrees of evi- 
 
282 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 dence, are in danger of overlooking evidence when it is 
 not glaring, and are easily imposed upon in such cases; 
 so, in proportion to the corruption of the heart, they 
 seem capable of satisfying themselves with having no 
 regard in practice to evidence acknowledged '*eal, if it 
 be not overbearing. From these things it must follow, 
 thit doubting concerning religion implies such a degree 
 of evidence for it as, joined with the consideration of its 
 importance, unquestionably lays men under the obliga- 
 tions before-mentioned, to have a dutiful regard to it in 
 all their behavior. 
 
 II. Thirdly, The difficulties in which the evidence 
 
 of religion is involved, which some complain of, is no 
 
 more a just 2;round of complaint than the 
 
 Difficulties . . . 
 
 in evidence no external circumstances of temptation which 
 
 more a cause of . , . .^ . . 
 
 complaint than Others are placed m, or than difficulties m 
 
 in practice. . , . . 
 
 the practice of it after a full conviction of 
 its truth. Temptations render our state a more improv- 
 ing state of discipline (part i, chap, v) than it would be 
 otherwise ; as they give occasion for a more attentive 
 exercise of the virtuous principle, which confirms and 
 strengthens it more than an easier or less attentive ex- 
 ercise of it could. Now speculative difficulties are, in 
 this respect, of the very same nature with these external 
 temptations. For the evidence of religion not appear- 
 ing obvious, is to some persons a temptation to reject it, 
 without any consideration at all ; and therefore requires 
 such an attentive exercise of the virtuous principle seri- 
 ously to consider that evidence, as there would be no 
 occasion for but for such temptation. And the sip- 
 posed doubtfulness of its evidence, after it has b^en in 
 some sort considered, affords opportunity to an unfair 
 mind of explaining away, and deceitfully hiding from 
 itself, that evidence which it might see : and also for 
 men's encouraging themselves in vice, from hopes of 
 impurity, though they do clearly see thus much at least, 
 
Chap. VI. ] Revelation not Universal. 283 
 
 that these hopes are uncertain : in like manner as the 
 common temptation to many instances of folly, which 
 end in temporal infamy and ruin, is the ground for hope 
 of not being detected, and of escaping with impunity , 
 that is. the doubtfulness of the proof beforehand, that 
 such foolish behavior will thus end in infamy and rum. 
 On the contrary, supposed doubtfulness in the evidence 
 of religion calls for a more careful and attentive exercise 
 of the virtuous principle in fairly yielding themselves up 
 to the proper influence of any real evidence, though 
 doubtful; and in practicing conscientiously all virtue, 
 though under some uncertainty whether the govern- 
 ment in the universe may not possibly be such as that 
 vice may escape with impunity. And in general, temp- 
 tation, meaning by this word the lesser allurements to 
 wrong, and difficulties in the discharge of our duty, as 
 well as the greater ones; temptation, I say, as such, and 
 of every kind and degree, as it calls forth some virtuous 
 efforts, additional to what would otherwise have been 
 wanting, cannot but be an additional discipline and im- 
 provement of virtue, as well as probation of it, in the 
 other senses of that word. (Part i, chap, iv, and page 150.) 
 So that the very same account is to be given why the 
 evidence of religion should be left in such a manner as 
 to require, in some, an attentive, solicitous, perhaps pain- 
 ful exercise of their understanding about it ; as why 
 others should be placed in such circumstances as that 
 the practice of its common duties, after a full conviction 
 of the truth of it, should require attention, solicitude, 
 and pains; or why appearing doubtfulness should be 
 permitted to afford matter of temptation to some ; as 
 why external difficulties and allurements should be per- 
 mitted to afford matter of temptation to others. The 
 same account also is to be given, why some should be 
 exercised with temptations of both these kinds, as why 
 others should be exercised with the latter in such very 
 
284 Analogy of Religion. [Pari II. 
 
 high degrees as some have been, particularly as the 
 primitive Christians were. 
 
 12. Nor does there appear any absurdity in supposing 
 
 that the speculative difficulties in which the evidence 
 
 »/. of religion is involved may make even the 
 
 Specnlativo dlf- . , -' _ 
 
 ficuitiesto some principal part of some persons' trial. For 
 
 the chief trial. . 
 
 as the chief temptations of the generality of 
 the world are the ordinary motives to injustice or unre- 
 strained pleasure ; or to live in the neglect of religion, 
 from that frame of mind, which renders many persons 
 almost without feeling as to any thing distant, or which 
 is not the object of their senses ; so there are other per- 
 sons without this shallowness of temper, persons of a 
 deeper sense as to what is invisible and future, who not 
 only see, but have a general practical feeling that what 
 is to come will be present, and that things are not less 
 real for their not being the objects of sense ; and who, 
 from their natural constitution of body and of temper, 
 and from their external condition, may have small temp- 
 tations to behave ill, small difficulty in behaving well, in 
 the common course of life. Now when these latter per- 
 sons have a distinct, full conviction of the truth of relig- 
 ion, without any possible doubts or difficulties, the prac- 
 tice of it is to them unavoidable, unless they will do a 
 constant violence to their own minds; and religion is 
 scarce any more a discipline to them, than it is to crea- 
 tures in a state of perfection. Yet these persons may 
 possibly stand in need of moral discipline and exercise 
 in a higher degree than they would have by such an 
 easy practice of religion. Or it may be requisite, foi 
 reasons unknown to us, that they should give some fur- 
 ther manifestation (page 151) what is their moral char- 
 acter, to the creation of God. than such a practice of it 
 would be. Thus in the great variety of religious situa- 
 tions in which men are placed, what constitutes — what 
 chiefly and peculiarly constitutes — the probation, in all 
 
Chap. V^I.l Revelation not Universal. 285 
 
 senses, of some persons, may be the difficulties in which 
 the evidence of religion is involved; and their principal 
 and distinguished trial may be, how they will behave 
 under and with respect to these difficulties. Circum- 
 stances in men's situation in their temporal capacity, 
 analogous in good measure to this respecting religioi\, 
 are to be observed. We find some persons are placed 
 in such a situation in the world, as that their chief diffi- ' 
 culty, with regard to conduct, is not the doing what is 
 prudent when it is known, for this, in numberless cases, 
 is as easy as the contrary, but to some the principal ex- 
 ercise is recollection, and being upon their guard against 
 deceits — the deceits, suppose, of those about them — 
 against ialse appearances of reason and prudence. To 
 persons in some situations,* the principal exercise with 
 respect to conduct is attention, in order to inform them- 
 selves what is proper, what is really the reasonable and 
 prudent part to act. 
 
 13. But as I have hitherto gone upon supposition that 
 men's dissatisfaction with the evidence of religion is not 
 owing to their neglects or prejudices; it 
 
 °, ,,, ,-, . Dissatisfaction 
 
 must be added, on the other hand, m all the fault of the 
 
 1 11 1 ,- objector. 
 
 common reason, and as what the truth of 
 the case plainly requires should be added, that such dis- 
 satisfaction possibly may be owing to those — possibly 
 may be men's own fault. For, 
 
 If there are any persons who never set themselves 
 heartily, and in earnest, to be informed in religion ; if 
 there are any who secretly wish it may not prove true, 
 and are less attentive to evidence than to difficulties, 
 and more to objections than to what is said in answer to 
 them; these persons will scarce be thought in a likel) 
 way of seeing the evidence of religion, though it were 
 most certainly true, and capable of being ever so fully 
 proved. If any accustom themselves to consider this 
 subject usually in the way of mirth and sport ; if they 
 
286 Analogy op Religion*. [Part II. 
 
 attend to forms and representations, and inadequate 
 manners of expression, instead of the real things intend- 
 ed by them, (for signs often can be no more than inad- 
 equately expressive of the things signified,) or if they 
 substitute human errors in the room of divine truth; 
 why may not all, or any of these things, hinder some 
 men from seeking that evidence which really is seen by 
 others ; as a like turn of mind, with respect to matters 
 of common speculation and practice, does, we find by 
 experience, hinder them from attaining that knowledge 
 and right understanding in matters of common specula- 
 tion and practice which more fair and attentive minds 
 attain to? And the effect will be the same, whether 
 their neglect of seriously considering the evidence of 
 religion, and their indirect' behavior with regard to it, 
 proceed from mere carelessness or from the grosser 
 vices ; or whether it be owing to this, that forms, and 
 figurative manners of expression, as well as errors, ad- 
 minister occasions of ridicule, when the things intended, 
 and the truth itself, would not. Men may indulge a 
 ludicrous turn so far as to lose all sense of conduct and 
 prudence in worldly affairs, and even, as it seems, to im- 
 pair their faculty of reason. And in general, levity, care- 
 lessness, passion, and prejudice, do hinder us from being 
 rightly informed with respect to common things ; and they 
 may, in like manner, and perhaps in some further provi- 
 dential manner, with respect to moral and religious sub- 
 jects ; may hinder evidence from being laid before us, 
 and from being seen when it is. The Scripture* does de • 
 
 * Dan. xii, lo. See also Isa. xxix, 13, 14 ; Matt, vi, 23, and xi, 
 25, and xiii, ii, 12 ; John iii, 19, and v, 44 ; I Cor. ii, 14, and 2 Cor 
 iv, 4; 2 Tim. iii, 13; and that affectionate, as well as authoritative 
 admonition, so very many times inculcated, " He that hath ears to 
 hear, let him hear." Grotius saw so strongly the thing intended in 
 these, and other passages of Scripture of the like sense, as to say, that 
 the proof given us of Christianity was less than it niight have been, 
 for this very purpose : Ut ita sermo Evangelii tanquam lapis esset 
 
Chap. VI. 1 Revelation not Universal. 287 
 
 clare, that every one shall not understand. And it makes 
 no difference by what providential conduct this comes 
 to pass ; whether the evidence of Christianity was, orig- 
 inally and with design, put and left so, as that those w4io 
 are desirous of evading moral obligations should not see 
 it, and that honest-minded persons should, or whether 
 it comes to pass by any other means. 
 
 14. Further : the general proof of natural religion and 
 of Christianity does, I think, lie level to proof level to 
 common men: even those the greatest part «>™™«°^°e"- 
 of whose time, from childhood to old age, is taken up 
 Avith providing, for themselves and their families, the 
 common conveniences, perhaps necessaries, of life ; 
 those, I mean, of this rank, who ever think at all of ask- 
 ing after proof or attending to it. Common men, were 
 they as much in earnest about religion as about their 
 temporal affairs, are capable of being convinced, upon 
 real evidence, that there is a God who governs the 
 world ; and they feel themselves to be of a moral na- 
 ture, and accountable creatures. And as Christianity 
 
 Lydius ad quern ingenia saiiabilia explorarentur. De Ver., R. C, liD. 
 2, toward the end. [We give the passage from Grotius in full : " If 
 there be any one who is not satisfied with the arguments hitherto al- 
 lejred for the tmth of the Christian religion, but desires more power- 
 ful ones, he ought to know that different things must have different 
 kinds of proof ; one sort in mathematics, another in the properties of 
 bodies, another in doubtful matters, and another in matters of fact. 
 And we are to abide by that whose testimonies are void of all suspi- 
 cion ; if this be not admitted, not only all history is of no further use, 
 and a great part of physic ; but all that natural affection, which is be- 
 tween parents and children, is lost, who can be known no other way. 
 A nd it is the will of God, that those things which he would have us 
 believe, so as that faith should be accepted from us as obedience, 
 should not be so very plain, as tho e things we perceive by our senses, 
 and by demonstration ; but only so far as is sufficient to procure the 
 belief, and persuade a man of the thing, who is not obstinately beni 
 against it : So that the gospel is, as it were, a touchstone, to try men's 
 honest dispositions by." — Dr. Crooks] 
 
288 Analogy of Religion. [Part' IT. 
 
 entirely falls in with this their natural sense of things, 
 so they are capable, not only of being persuaded, but of 
 being made to see that there is evidence of miracles 
 wrought in attestation of it, and many appearing com- 
 pletions of prophecy. But though this proof is real and 
 conclusive, yet it is liable to objections, and maybe run 
 up into difficulties; which, however, persons who ..ui. 
 capable, not only of talking of, but of really seeing, are 
 capable also of seeing through ; that is, not of clearing 
 up and answering them, so as to satisfy their curiosity, 
 for of such knowledge we are not capable with respect 
 to any one thing in nature; but capable of seeing that 
 the proof is not lost in these difficulties, or destroyed by 
 these objections. But then a thorough examination 
 into religion with regard to these objections, which 
 cannot be the business of every man, is a matter of 
 pretty large compass, and from the nature of it re- 
 quires some knowledge as well as time and attention 
 to see how the evidence comes out upon balancing 
 one thing with another, and what, upon the whole, is 
 the amount of it. Now if persons who have picked 
 up these objections from others, and take for grant- 
 ed they are of weight, upon the word of those from 
 whom they received them, or by often retailing of 
 them come to see, or fancy they see, them to be of 
 weight, will not prepare themselves for such an exami- 
 nation, with a competent degree of knowledge, or will 
 not give that time and attention to the subject which, 
 from the nature of it, is necessary for attaining such infor- 
 mation ; in this case they must remain in doubtfulness 
 ignorance, or error; in the same way as they must with 
 regard to common sciences, and matters of common life, 
 if they neglect the necessary means of being informed 
 in them. 
 
 15. But still, perhaps, it will be objected, that if a 
 prince or common master were to send directions to a 
 
Chap. VI.J Revelation not Universal. 289 
 
 servant, he would take care that they should always 
 bear the certain marks who they came from, ob. The evi- 
 
 , , , . 1-1111 1 • dence should b# 
 
 and that their sense should be always plain, as plain as the 
 so as that there should be no possible doubt, masterTo^a^rv- 
 if he could help it, concerning the author- *°'' 
 ity or meaning of them. Now the proper answer to 
 fill this kind of objections is, that wherever the fallacv 
 lies, it is even certain we cannot argue thus wiln respect 
 to Him who is the governor of the world ; and particu- 
 larly, that he does not afford us such information, with 
 respect to our temporal affairs and interests, as experi- 
 ence abundantly shows. However, there is a full an- 
 swer to this objection, from the very nature nf religion. 
 For the reason why a prince would give his directions 
 in this plain manner is, that he absolutely desires such 
 an external action should be done, without concerning 
 himself with the motive or principle upon which it is 
 done; that is, he regards only the external ev;nt, or the 
 thing's being done, and not at all, properly speaking, the 
 doing of it, or the action. Whereas the whole of moral- 
 ity and religion, consisting merely in action itself, there 
 is no sort of parallel between the cases. ' But if the 
 prince be supposed to regard only the action; that is, 
 only to desire to exercise, or in any sense prove, the 
 understanding or loyalty of a servant, he would not al- 
 ways give his orders in such a plain manner. It may be 
 proper to add, that the will of God, respecting morality 
 and religion, may be considered either as absolute, or as 
 only conditional. If it be absolute, it can only be thus 
 that we should act virtuously in such given circum- 
 stances ; not that we should be brought to act so by his 
 :.hafiging of our circumstances. And if God's will be 
 thus absolute, then it is in our power, in the highest and 
 strictest sense, to do or to contradict his will ; which is 
 a most weighty consideration. Or his will may be con- 
 sidered onlv as conditional — that if we act so and so, we 
 19 
 
2yo Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 shall be rewarded; if otherwise, punished; of which 
 conditional will of the Author of nature, the whole con- 
 stitution of it affords most certain instances. 
 
 1 6. Upon the whole : that we are in a state of religion 
 necessarily implies that we are in a state of probation: 
 Probation im- and the Credibility of our being at all in 
 Ee^n the'^things such a State being admitted, there seems no 
 objected to. peculiar difficulty in supposing our proba- 
 tion to be, just as it is, in those respects which are above 
 objected against. There seems no pretense, from the 
 reason of the things to say that the trial cannot equitably 
 be any thing, but whether persons will act suitably to 
 certain information, or such as admits no room for 
 doubt ; so as that there can be no danger of miscar- 
 riage, but either from their not attending to what they 
 certainly know, or from overbearing passion hurrying 
 them on to act contrary to it. For since ignorance and 
 doubt afford scope for probation in all senses, as really 
 as intuitive conviction or certainty ; and since the two 
 former are to be put to the same account as difficulties 
 in practice; men's moral probation may also be, whether 
 they will take due care to inform themselves by impar- 
 tial consideration, and afterward whether they will act 
 as the case requires, upon the evidence which they have, 
 however doubtful. And this, we find by experience^ is 
 frequently our probation, (pages 77, 282, etc,,) in our 
 temporal capacity. For the information which we want, 
 with regard to our worldly interests, is by no means al- 
 ways given us of course, without any care of our own. 
 And we are greatly liable to self-deceit from inward 
 secret prejudicijs; and also to the deceit of others. So 
 that to be able to judge what is the prudent part, often 
 requires much and difficult consideration. Then after 
 we have judged the very best we can, the evidence upon 
 which we must act, if we will live and act at all, is perpetu- 
 ally doubtful to a very high degree. And the constitution 
 
CiiA]'. VIJ Revelation not Universal. 291 
 
 and course of the world in fact is such, as that want of 
 impartial consideration what we have to do, and ventur- 
 ing upon extravagant courses, because it is doubtful 
 what will be the consequences, are often naturally, that 
 is. i;.rovidentially, altogether as fatal, as misconduct oc- 
 casioned by heedless inattention to what we certainly 
 know, or disregarding it from overbearing passion. 
 
 .17, Several of the observations here made may well 
 seem strange, perhaps unintelligible, to mpny good men. 
 But if the persons for whose sake they are _ 
 
 ^ ^ ■' vVe act on evl- 
 
 made think so ; persons who object as above, denceioweithan 
 
 , probable. 
 
 and throw ori all regard to religion under 
 pretense of want of evidence ; I desire them to consider 
 again, whether their thinking so be owing to any thing 
 unintelligible in these observations, or to their own not 
 having such a» sense of religion, and serious solicitude 
 about it, as even their state of skepticism does in all 
 reason require ? It ought to be forced upon the reflec- 
 tion of these persons that our nature and condition nec- 
 essarily require us, in the daily course of life, to act 
 upon evidence much lower than what is commonly 
 called probable ; to guard not only against what we ful- 
 ly believe will, but also against what we think it sup- 
 posable may, happen ; and to engage in pursuits when 
 the probability is greatly against success, if it be crediDn; 
 that possibly we may succeed in them. 
 
2.92 Analogy of Religion. LPart II 
 
 CHAPTER VII. 
 
 OF THE PARTICULAR EVIDENCE FOR CHRISTIANITY.'* 
 
 ^ I ^HE presumptions against revelation, and objections 
 
 _L against the general scheme of Christianity, and 
 
 „ , ., particular things relating to it, being re- 
 Proof aside ^ . . 
 from miracles movcd, there remains to be considered, what 
 
 and p' r>pliec3'. ... 
 
 positive evidence we have for the truth of 
 it : chiefly in order to see what the analogy of nature 
 suggests with regard to that evidence, and the objections 
 against it ; or to see what is, and is allowed to be, the 
 plain, natural rule of judgment and of action in our 
 temporal concerns, in cases where we have the same 
 kind of evidence, and the same kind of objections 
 against it, that we have in the case before us. 
 
 Now, in the evidence of Christianity, there seem to 
 be several things of great weight, not reducible to the 
 
 * [At the place where we now find ourselves, Butler makes a transi- 
 tion in his argument : he passes from the subject-matter of Christian- 
 ity to its evidence. He has hitherto been employed in removing the 
 objections against Christianity itself by the argument of analogy, and 
 by the same engine he now proceeds to remove the objections that 
 maybe leveled against the proof of it. The two objects are altogeth- 
 er distinct. ... In the discharge of this second sei-vice, he is not 
 called upon to propound very fully, or in the way of positive vindi- 
 cation, the evidences of Christianity. He adverts to them ; he states 
 what they are ; he even renders a passing homage to their authority 
 an \ force ; but his proper task is to do by them what he had before 
 dot : by the subject-matter of revelation, that is, clear away the ob. 
 jections, not now against the doctrine of Christianity, but against the 
 proof of it, and that by showing that the similar or analogous objec- 
 tions in other cases are not admitted to have the validity which, in 
 the case of the evangelical story, the opponents of the gospel would 
 fain allow to them. — Chai.mkr?.] 
 
Chat. VII. ] Evidence for Christianity. 293 
 
 head either of miracles or the completion of prophecy, 
 in the c :)mmon acceptation of the words. But these 
 two are its direct and fundamental proofs; and those 
 other things, however considerable they are, yet ought 
 never tc; be urged apart from its direct proofs, but al- 
 ways to be joined with them. Thus the evidence of 
 Christianity will be a long series of things reaching, as 
 it seems, from the beginning of the world to the present 
 time, of great variety and compass, taking in both the 
 direct and also the collateral proofs, and making up, all 
 of them together, one argument; the conviction arising 
 from which kind of proof may be compared to what they 
 call the effect in architecture or other works of art — a re- 
 sult from a great number of things so and so disposed, 
 and taken into one view. I shall, therefore, ^rj/, make 
 some observations relating to miracles, and the appear- 
 ing completion of prophecy, and consider what anal- 
 ogy suggests in answer to the objections brought against 
 this evidence. And secojidly, I shall endeavor to give 
 some account of the general argument now mentioned, 
 consisting both of the direct and collateral evidence, 
 considered as making up one argument : this being the 
 kind of proof upon which we determine most questions 
 of difficulty concerning common facts alleged to have 
 happened, or seeming likely to happen ; especially ques- 
 tions relating to conduct. 
 
 2. First, I shall make some observations upon the di- 
 rect proof of Christianity from miracles and 
 piophecy, and upon the objections alleged ^^' 
 
 r.gainst it. 
 
 I. Now the following observations, relating to the his 
 lorical evidence of miracles wrought in attestation of 
 Christianity, appear to be of great weight. 
 
 I. The Old Testament affords us the same historical 
 evidence of the miracles of Moses and of the prophets 
 as of the common civil history of Moses and the kings 
 
2()4 Analogy of Religion.' (Part II 
 
 of Israel ; or, as of the affairs of the Jewish nation 
 And the Gospels and the Acts afford us the same histor- 
 ical evidence of the miracles of Christ and the apostles 
 as of the common matters related in them.* This in- 
 deed could not have been affirmed* by any reasonable 
 man, if the authors of these books, like many other his- 
 torians, had appeared to make an entertaining manner 
 of writing their aim ; though they had interspersed mii- 
 acles ia their works, at proper distances, and upon prop- 
 er occasions. These might have animated a dull rela- 
 tion, amused the reader, and engaged his attention. 
 And the same account would naturally have been given 
 of them, as of the speeches and descriptions of such 
 authors; the same account, in a manner, as is to be 
 given why the poets make use of wonders and prodigies 
 But the facts, both miraculous and natural, in Scripture 
 are related in plain, unadorned narratives; and both of 
 them appear, in all respects, to stand upon the same 
 footing of historical evidence. 
 
 Further : some parts of Scripture, containing an ac 
 count of miracles fully sufficient to prove 
 
 Scripture qiiot- ... 
 
 I'd from ago t» the truth of Christianity, are quoted as gen- 
 uine, from the age in which they are said 
 to be written down to the present : and no other parts 
 
 * [This was clearly observed and distinctly stated by Lord Boling- 
 bj-oke : "The miracles in the Bible are not like those in Livy. de- 
 tached pieces that do not disturb the civil history, which goes on .^.y 
 well without them. But the miracles of the Jewish historian are in- 
 timately connected with all the civil affairs, and make a necessary 
 and inseparable part. The whole history is loundqd in them ; it con. 
 sists of little else ; and if it were not a history of them, it would be ?. 
 history of nothing." — Bolingh'oke^s Posthumous Works ^ vol. iii, p. 279. 
 The state of the case seems to be, that the gravity, distinctness, and 
 gcod sense of the Scripture histories, in relating civil affairs, prove 
 those narratives not to be mythical, that is, not to be the product of 
 imagiiiatidn. Ancf the intimate connection of the miraculous with 
 tiae "natural facts, proves that the former are hot merely "ihtrodiiced 
 for the sake of ornament. — F.] 
 
Chap. VII. 1 Evidence for Christianiiy. 295- 
 
 of them, material in the present question, are omitted to 
 be quoted in such manner as to afford any sort of proof 
 of their not being genuine. And as common history, 
 when called in question in any instance, may often be 
 greatly confirmed by contemporary or subsequent events 
 more known and acknowledged ; and as the common 
 Scripture history, like many others, is thus confirmed; 
 so likewise is the miraculous history of it, not only in 
 particular instances, but in general. For the establish- 
 ment of the Jewish and Christian religions, which were 
 events contemporary with the miracles related to be 
 wrought in attestation of both, or subsequent to them, 
 these events are just what we should have expected, 
 upon supposition such miracles were really wrought to 
 attest the truth of these religions. These miracles are 
 a satisfactory account of those events, of which no other 
 satisfactory account can be given, nor any account at 
 all but what is imaginary merely and invented. It is to 
 be added, that the most obvious, the most easy and di- 
 rect account of this history, how it came to be written, 
 and to be received in the world as a true history, is, that 
 it really is so; nor can any other account of it be easy 
 and direct. Now though an account not at all obvious, 
 but very far-fetched and indirect, may indeed be and 
 often is, the true account of a matter; yet it cannot be 
 admitted on the authority of its being asserted. Mere 
 guess, supposition, and possibility, when opposed to his- 
 torical evidence, prove nothing but that historical evi- 
 dence is not demonstrative. 
 
 3. Now the just consequence from all this, I think, is, 
 that the Scripture history, in general, is to be admitted 
 as an authentic genuine history till some- scripture nis- 
 what positive be alleged sufficient to invali- Sted^tm Lval.' 
 date it. But no man will deny the conse- *^^^«^- 
 quence to be, that it cannot be rejected, or thrown by 
 as of no authority, till it can be proved to be of none; 
 
296 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 even though the evidence now mentioned for its author- 
 ity were doubtful. This evidence may be confronted 
 by historical evidence on the other side, if there be a ly ; 
 or general incredibility in the things related, or incon- 
 sistence in the general turn of the history, would prove 
 it to be ot no authority. But since, upon the face of the 
 matter, upon a first and general view, the appearance is 
 that it is an authentic history, it cannot be determined 
 to be fictitious without some proof that it is so. And 
 the following observations, in support of these, and co- 
 incident with them, will greatly confirm the 'historical 
 evidence for the truth of Christianity. 
 
 4. 2. The epistles of St. Paul, from the nature of epis- 
 tolary writing, and moreover from several of them being 
 Evidence from written, not to particular persons, but to 
 'ndipendenund Churches, Carry in them evidences of their 
 peculiar. being genuine beyond what can be, in a 
 
 mere historical narrative, left to the world at large.* 
 This evidence, joined with that which they have in 
 common with the rest of the New Testament, seems not 
 to leave so much as any particular pretence for denying 
 their genuineness, considered as an ordinary matter of 
 fact or of criticism. I %2iy ^ particular pretence for deny- 
 ing it ; because any single fact of such a kind and such 
 antiquity may have general doubts raised concerning it, 
 from the very nature of human affairs and human testi- 
 mony. There is also to be mentioned a distinct and 
 particular evidence of the genuineness of the epistle 
 chiefly referred to here, the first to the Corinthians : 
 from the manner in which it is quoted by Clemens Ro- 
 manus, in an epistle of his own to that Church. f Now 
 these epistles afford a proof of Christianity, detached 
 
 * [The argument here hinted at is forcibly presented in Paley's 
 admirable work, " Horae Paulinas." See" also Blunt's " Undesigned 
 Coincidences both of the Old and New Testaments."] 
 
 f Clem. Rom., Ep. 1, ch. xlvii. 
 
Chai*. VII.1 KvioKNCE FOR Christianity. 297 
 
 fiMii all others, which is, I think, a thing of weight; 
 and also a proof of a nature and kind peculiar to itself. 
 For, 
 
 In them the author declares, that he received the 
 Gospel in general, and the institution of the communion 
 in particular, not from the rest of the apostles, or jointly 
 together with them, but alone from Christ himself: whom 
 he declares, likewise, conformably to the history in the 
 Acts, that.he saw after his ascension.* So that the tes- 
 timony of St. Paul is to be considered as detached from 
 that of the rest of the apostles. 
 
 And he declares turther that he was endued with a 
 power of working miracles, as what was publicly known 
 to this very people ; speaks of frequent and great varie- 
 ty of miraculous gifts as then subsisting in those very 
 Churches to which he was writing; which he was reprov- 
 ing for several irregularities, and where he had personal 
 opposers : he mentions these gifts incidentally, in the 
 most easy manner, and without effort; by way of re- 
 proof to those who had them, for their indecent use of 
 them ; and by way of depreciating them, in comparison 
 of moral virtues. In short, he speaks to these Churches 
 of these miraculous powers in the manner any one would 
 speak to another of a thing which was as familiar, and 
 as much known in common to them both, as any thing 
 in the world. t And this, as hath been observed by 
 several persons, is surely a very considerable thing. 
 
 5. 3. It is an acknowledged historical fact that Chris- 
 Uanity offered itself to the world, and demanded to be re- 
 ceived, upon the allegation, that is, as un- 
 
 , , . , , , , Christianity 
 
 believers would speak, upon the pretense of avowedly foimd- 
 
 , 1 T 1 1 1 , ed on niirticles, 
 
 miracles, publicly wrought to attest the truth 
 
 of it in such an age ; and that it was actually received by 
 
 * Gal. i ; i Cor, xi, 23, etc. ; i Cor. xv, 8. 
 
 f Rom. XV, ig ; I Cor. xii, 8-28, etc., and chap. xiii. i, 2, 8, anH 
 
 the "vv!r>li >:;vth chap. ; 2 Cor xii, 12. 13 • Gal. iii. 2, ?. 
 
29^ Analogy of Religion. [Part IT. 
 
 great numbers in that very age, and upon tho professed 
 belief of the reality of these miracles. And Christianity, 
 including the dispensation of the Old Testament, seems 
 distinguished by this from all other religions. I mean 
 that this does not appear to be the case with regard to 
 any other. For surely it will not be supposed to lie 
 upon any person to prove, by positive historical evidence, 
 that it was not. It does in no sort appear that Moham- 
 medanism was first received in the world upon the foot- 
 ing of supposed miracles,* that is, public ones; for, as 
 revelation is itself miraculous, all pretense to it must 
 necessarily imply some pretense of miracles. And it is 
 a known fact, that it was immediately, at the very first, 
 propagated by other means. And as particular institu- 
 tions, whether in paganism or popery, said to be con- 
 firmed by miracles, after those institutions had obtained 
 are not to the purpose ; so, were there what might be 
 called historical proof, that any of them were introduced 
 by a supposed divine command, believed to be attested 
 by miracles, these would not be in any wise parallel. 
 For single things of this sort are easy to be accounted 
 for, after parties are formed, and have power in their 
 hands; and the leaders of them are in veneration with 
 the multitude ; and political interests are blended with 
 religious claims and religious distinctions. But before 
 any thing of this kind, for a few persons, and those of 
 the lowest rank, all at once, to bring over such great 
 numbers to a new religion, and get it to be received 
 upon the particular evidence of miracles — this is quite 
 another thing. 
 
 And I think it will be allowed by any fair adveisary 
 
 * See the Koran, chap, xiii and xvii. [The infidel says, unless 
 a sign be sent down unto him from his Lord, we will not believe ; 
 thou art a preacher only.— Sale's Trans., p. 20i, ed, 4to. "Nothing 
 hindered us from sending thee with miracles, excfept that the fdrnieit 
 nations have charged them with imposture."] 
 
Chap. VII. 1 Ev.dExNce for Christianity. 299 
 
 .hat the fact now mentioned, taking in all the circum- 
 stances of it, is peculiar to the Christian religion. How- 
 ever, the fact itself is allowed, that Chris- 
 
 In this peculiar. 
 
 t:anity obtained, that is, was professed to be 
 received, in the world, upon the belief of miracles, im- 
 mediately in the age in which it is said those miracles 
 were wrought : or that this is what its first converts 
 would have alleged as the reason for their embracing it 
 Now certainly it is not to be supposed that such num- 
 bers of men, in the most distant parts of the world, 
 should forsake the religion of their country, in which 
 they had been educated ; separate themselves from their 
 friends, particularly in their festival shows and solemni- 
 ties, to which the common people are so greatly addicted, 
 and which were of a nature to engage ihem much more 
 than any thing of that sort among us; and embrace 
 a religion, which could not but expose them to many in- 
 conveniences, and indeed must have been a giving up 
 the world in a great degree, even from the very first, 
 and before the empire engaged in form against them : 
 it cannot be supposed that such numbers should make 
 so great, and, to say the least, so inconvenient a change 
 in their whole institution of life, unless they were 
 really convinced of the truth of those miracles upon 
 the knowledge or belief of which they professed to 
 make it. 
 
 And it will, I suppose, readily be acknowledged, that 
 the generality of the first converts to Christianity must 
 have believed them ; that as, by becoming 
 
 •' ° First converts 
 
 Christians, they declared to the world they believed mira- 
 
 clei. 
 
 were satisfied of the truth of those miracles, 
 so this declaration was to be credited. And this their 
 testimony is the same kind of evidence for those mira- 
 cles as if they had put it in writing, and these writings 
 had come down to us. " Arid it is real evidence, because 
 it is of facts which they had capacity and full opportu- 
 
300 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 nity to inform themselves of. It is also distinct from the 
 direct or express historical evidence, though it is of the 
 same kind; and it would be allowed to be distinct in all 
 cases. For were a fact expressly related by one or more 
 ancient historians, and disputed in after ages: that this 
 fact is acknowledged to have been believed, by gre.it 
 numbers of the age in which the historian says it was 
 done, would be allowed an additional proof of such fact, 
 quite distinct from the express testimony of the histo- 
 rian. The credulity of mankind is acknowledged, and 
 the suspicions of mankind ought to be acknowledged 
 too; and their backwardness even to believe, and great- 
 er still to practice, what makes against their interest. 
 And it must particularly be remembered, that education, 
 and prejudice, and authority were against Christianity 
 in the age I am speaking of. So that the immediate 
 conversion of such numbers is a real presumption of 
 somewhat more than human in this matter:* I saj 
 presumption, for it is not alleged as a proof, alone 
 and by itself. Nor need any one of the things men- 
 tioned in this chapter be considered as a proof by it- 
 self; and yet all of them together may be one of the 
 strongest. 
 
 6. Upon the whole : as there is large historical evi- 
 dence, both direct and circumstantial, of miracles 
 
 * [Arnobius, one of the earliest Christian writers, says : "Shall we 
 say that the men of those times were inconsiderate, deceitful, and 
 brutish enough to feign having seen what they never riw ? And that 
 when they might have lived in peace and comfort they chose gratui- 
 tous hatred and obloquy ? " 
 
 The rejection of Christianity by so many in the first ages was the 
 result of the continual action of personal hereditary prejudice and 
 depravity capable of resisting any supposable evidence. But the 
 reception of Christianity by multitudes, under the same evidences, and 
 to their immediate personal damage, shows strongly that there was 
 enough evidence to produce those effects. Thus the rejection by 
 $ome does not countervail the acceptance by others. — Malco.m.] 
 
Chap. VI 1. 1 KvmF.NCE for Christianity. 301 
 
 wrought in attestation of Christianity, collected by those 
 u'ho have writ upon the subject, it lies upon unbeliev- 
 ers to show why this evidence is not to be „ ^ ^ , 
 
 •^ ... Burden of pi (XM 
 
 credited. This way of speaking is, I think, with unixiiie?- 
 just, and what persons who write in de- 
 fense of religion naturally fall into. Yet in a natter of 
 su( h unspeakable importance, the proper question is, nol 
 whom it lies upon, according to the rules of argument, 
 to maintain or confute objections; but whether there 
 really are any, against this evidence, sufficient in reason 
 to destroy the credit of it ? However, unbelievers seem 
 to take upon them the part of showing that there are. 
 
 They allege that numberless enthusiastic people, in 
 different ages and countries, expose themselves to the 
 same difficulties which the primitive Chris- o^jp^tions 
 tians did, and are ready to give up their [j'^^jg^"'^ ®°" 
 lives for the most idle follies imaginable. 
 But it is not very clear to what purpose this objection is 
 brought. For every one, surely, in every case, must 
 distinguish between opinions and facts. And though 
 testimony is no proof of enthusiastic opinions, or of any 
 opinions at all ; yet it is allowed, in all other cases, to be 
 a proof of facts. And a person's laying down his life in 
 attestation of facts, or of opinions, is the strongest proof 
 of his believing them. And if the apostles and their 
 contemporaries did believe the facts in attestation of 
 which they exposed themselves to sufferings and death, 
 this their belief, or rather knowledge, must be a proof 
 of those facts; for they were such as came under the 
 observation of their senses. And though it is not ( f 
 equal weight, yet it is. of weight, that the martyrs of the 
 n ^xt age, notwithstanding they were not eye-witnesses 
 of those facts, as were the apostles and their contempo- 
 raries, had, however, full opportunity to inform them- 
 selves whether they were true or not, and gave e(|iial 
 |)roof-of their believing them to he true. 
 
302 Analogy of Religion. [Part II 
 
 7. But enthusiasm, it is said, greatly weakens the evi. 
 
 dence of testimony, even for facts, in matters relating to 
 
 _, ^, . religion; some seem to think it totally and 
 
 Enthu.'iasm ^ ' -' 
 
 weakens evi- absolutely destrovs the evidence of testi- 
 
 dence. -^ •' 
 
 mony upon this subject. And, indeed, the 
 powers of enthusiasm, and of diseases too, which open. re 
 in a like manner, are very wonderful in particular in- 
 stances. But if great numbers of men, not appearing in 
 any peculiar degree weak, nor under any peculiar sus- 
 picion of negligence, affirm that they saw and heard 
 such things plainly with their eyes and their ears, and 
 are admitted to be in earnest ; such testimony is evi- 
 dence of the strongest kind we can have for any matter 
 of fact. Yet possibly it may be overcome, strong as it 
 is, by incredibility in the things thus attested, or by con- 
 trary testimony. And in an instance where one thought 
 it was so overcome, it might be just to consider how far 
 such evidence could be accounted for by enthusiasm : 
 for it seems as if no other imaginable account were to 
 be given of it. But till such incredibility be shown, or 
 contrary testimony produced, it cannot surely be ex- 
 pected that so far-fetched, so indirect and wonderful an 
 account of such testimony, as that of enthusiasm must 
 be ; an account so strange, that the generality of man- 
 kind can scarce be made to understand what is meant 
 by it; it cannot, I say, be expected, that such account 
 will be admitted of such evidence, when there is this 
 direct, easy, and obvious account of it, that people real- 
 ly saw and heard a thing not incredible, which they 
 affirm sincerely, and with full assurance, that they did 
 see and hear. 
 
 Granting, then, that enthusiasm is not (strictly speak- 
 The objection ino;) an absurd, but a possible account of 
 
 suppos )s the ^ . . , ^ . 
 
 tiiin<,'s attested such testimony, it is manifest that the verv 
 
 incredible, hence . . . 
 
 of no force. mention of It goes upon the previous suppo- 
 sition that the thinjrs so attested are incredible, and 
 
Cha.'.VIIJ Evidence for Christianity. 303 
 
 therefore need not be considered till they are shown to 
 be so. Much less need it be considered after the con- 
 trary has been proved. And I think it has been proved, 
 to full satisfaction, that there is no incredibility in a rev- 
 elation in general, or in such a one as the Christian in 
 particular. However, as religion is supposed peculiarly 
 liable to enthusiasm, it may just be observed, that prej- 
 udices almost without number, and without name, ro- 
 mance, affectation, humor, a desire to engage attention 
 or to surprise, the party spirit, custom, little competi- 
 tions, unaccountable likings and dislikings ; these influ- 
 ence men strongly in common matters. And as these 
 prejudices are often scarce known or reflected upon by 
 the persons themselves who are influenced by them, 
 they are to be considered as influences of a like kind to 
 enthusiasm. Yet human testimony in common matters 
 is naturally and justly believed notwithstanding. 
 
 8. It is intimated further, in a more refined way of 
 observation, that though it should be proved seif-deception 
 that the apostles and first Christians could combinedTiTtL 
 not, in some respects, be deceived them- ^P^sties. 
 selves, and in other respects cannot be thought to have 
 intended to impose upon the world, yet it will not follow 
 that their general testimony is to be believed, though 
 truly handed down to us ; because they might still in 
 part, that is, in other respects, be deceived themselves, 
 and in part also designedly impose upon others; which, 
 it is added, is a thing very credible, from that mixture 
 of real enthusiasm and real knavery, to be met with in 
 the same characters. 
 
 And I must confess, I think the matter of fact con- 
 tained in this observation upon mankind is not to be 
 denied ; and that somewhat very much akin to it, is 
 often supposed in Scripture, as a very common case, and 
 most severely reproved. But it were to have been ex- 
 pected, that ptfrsons capable of applying this observa- 
 
304 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 tion, as applied in the objection, might also frequently 
 nave met with the like mixed character in instances 
 where religion was quite out of the case. The thing 
 plainly is, that mankind are naturally endowed with rea- 
 son, or a capacity of distinguishing between truth and 
 falsehood ; and as naturally they are endued with verac ■ 
 ity, or a regard to truth in what they say : but fron 
 many occasions, they are liable to be prejudiced, and 
 biased, and deceived themselves, and capable of intend- 
 ing to deceive others, in every different degree ; inso- 
 much that, as we are all liable to be deceived by preju- 
 dice, so likewise it seems to be not an uncommon thing 
 for persons who, from their regard to truth, would »^ot 
 invent a lie entirely without any foundation at all, to 
 propagate it with heightening circumstances, after it is 
 once invented and set agoing. And others, though they 
 would not propagate a lie, yet, which is a lower degree 
 of falsehood, will let it pass without contradiction. But 
 notwithstanding all this, human testimony remains still 
 a natural ground of assent ; and this assent, a natural 
 principle of action. 
 
 9. It is objected further, that, however it has hap- 
 pened, the fact is, that mankind have in different ages 
 Delusions from been Strangely deluded with pretenses to 
 aiiegediniracies. ^liracles and wonders. But it is by no 
 means to be admitted, that they have been oftener, or 
 are at all more liable to be, deceived by these pretenses 
 than by others. 
 
 It is added, that there is a very considerable degree 
 of historical evidence for miracles which are on al) 
 hands acknowledged to be fabulous. But suppose that 
 there were even the like historical evidence for these to 
 what there is for those alleged in proof of Christianity, 
 which yet is in nowise allowed, but suppose this ; the 
 consequence would not be, that the evidence of the lat- 
 ter is not to be admitted. Nor is there a man in the 
 
Chap. VII. J Evidence fok Christianity. 305 
 
 world who, in common cases, would conclude thus. 
 For what would such a conclusion really amount to but 
 this, that evidence confuted by contrary evidence, or 
 any way overbalanced, destroys the credibility of other 
 evidence neither confuted nor overbalanced ? To argue 
 that because there is, if there were, like evidence from 
 testimony for miracles acknowledged false, as for those 
 in attestation of Christianity, therefore the evidence in 
 the latter case is not to be credited; this is the same as 
 to argue, that if two men of equally good reputation had 
 given evidence in different cases no way connected, and 
 one of them had been convicted of perjury, this confuted 
 the testimony of the other. 
 
 10. Upon the whole, then, the general observation 
 that human creatures are so liable to be deceived, from 
 enthusiasm in religion, and principles equiv- 
 
 . ° . ^ ^ ^ Testimony mav 
 
 alent to enthusiasm m common matters, and be weakened yet 
 
 not destroyed. 
 
 m both from negligence ; and that they are 
 so capable of dishonestly endeavoring to deceive others; 
 this does, indeed, weaken the evidence of testimony in 
 all cases, but does not destroy it in any. And these 
 things will appear to different men to weaken the evi- 
 dence of testimony in different degrees ; in degrees pro- 
 portionable to the observations they have made, or the 
 notions they have any way taken up, concerning the 
 weakness, and negligence, and dishonesty of mankind ; 
 or concerning the powers of enthusiasm, and prejudices 
 equivalent to it. But it seems to me, that people do not 
 know what they say, who affirm these things to destrov 
 the evidence from testimony which we have of the truth 
 of Christianity. Nothing can destroy the evidence of 
 testimony in any case but a proof, or probability, that 
 persons are not competent judges of the facts to which 
 they give testimony ; or that they are actually under 
 some indirect influence in giving it, in such particular 
 
 case. Till this be made out, the natural laws of human 
 •20 
 
3o6 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 actions require that testimony be admitted. It can 
 never be sufficient to overthrow direct historical evi- 
 dence, indolently to say, that there are so many princi- 
 ples from whence men are liable to be deceived them- 
 selves, and disposed to deceive others, especially in 
 matters of religion, that one knows not what to believe. 
 And it is surprising persons can help reflecting, that this 
 very manner of speaking supposes, they are not satisfied 
 that there is nothing in the evidence of which they speak 
 thus; or thafthey can avoid observing, if they do make 
 this reflection, that it is, on such a subject, a very 
 material one.* 
 
 II, And over against all these objections, is to be set 
 the importance of Christianity, as what must have en- 
 Tho importance gaged the attention of its first converts, so 
 prevented'^S ^s to havc rendered them less liable to be 
 delusions. deceived from carelessness than they would 
 
 in common matters; and, likewise, the strong obliga- 
 tions to veracity which their religion laid them under: 
 so that the first and most obvious presumption is, that 
 they could not be deceived themselves, nor would de- 
 ceive others. And this presumption, in this degree, is 
 peculiar to the testimony we have been considering. 
 
 In argument, assertions are nothing in themselves, and 
 have an air of positiveness which sometimes is not very 
 \\iiatnnheiiev- easy ; yet they are necessary, and necessary 
 ers mubt admit. ^^ ^^ repeated, in order to connect a dis- 
 course, and distinctly to lay before the view of the read- 
 er what is proposed to be proved, and what is left as 
 j^roved. Now the conclusion from the foregoing obser- 
 vations is, I think, beyond all doubt this: that unbe- 
 lievers must be forced to admit the external evidence 
 for Christianity, that is, the proof of miracles wrought to 
 attest it, to be of real v/eight and very considerable ; 
 though they cannot allow it to be sufficient to convince 
 •See the forejToing chppter. 
 
Ch\p. VII.] Evidence FOR Christianity. 307 
 
 them of the reality of those miracles. And as they must, 
 in all reason, admit this, so it seems to me, that upon 
 consideration they would in fact admit it ; those of them, 
 I mean, who know any thing at all of the 'matter: in 
 like manner as persons, in many cases, own they see 
 strong evidence from testimony for the truth of things, 
 which yet they cannot be convinced are true; cases, 
 suppose, where there is contrary testimony, or things 
 which they think, whether with or without reason, to be 
 incredible. But there is no testimony contrary to that 
 which we have been considering ; and it has been fully 
 proved that there is no incredibility in Christianity in 
 general, or in any part of it. 
 
 12. II. As to the evidence for Christianity from 
 prophecy I shall only make some few gen- Prophocy— ob- 
 eral observations, which are suggested by the fn vliSite'^ S ' 
 analogy of nature ; that is, by the acknowl- ^^^^ 
 edged natural rules of judging in common matters con- 
 cerning evidence of a like kind to this from prophecy. 
 
 I. The obscurity or unintelligibleness of one part of a 
 prophecy does not in any degree invalidate the proof 
 of foresight, arising from the appearing completion of 
 those other parts which are understood. For the case 
 is evidently the same as if those parts which are not un- 
 derstood were lost, or not written at all, or written in an 
 unknown tongue. Whether this observation be com- 
 monly attended to or not, it is so evident that one can 
 scarce bring one's self to set down an instance in com- 
 mon matiers to exemplify it. However, suppose a writ- 
 ing partly in cypher, and partly in plain words at length, 
 anc thLt in th ^ part one understood, there appeared 
 mention of several known facts; it would never come 
 into any man's thoughts to imagine, that if he under- 
 stood th^ whole, perhaps he might find that those facts 
 were not in reality known by the latter. Indeed, both 
 in 'hi«; ex^iiv,«lt. nnd the thing intended to be exempli. 
 
3o8 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 Tied by it, our not understanding the whole (the whole, 
 suppose, of a sentence or a paragraph) might sometimes 
 occasion a doubt whether one understood the literal 
 moaning of such a part ; but this comes under another 
 consideration. 
 
 For the same reason, though a man should be incapa- 
 ble, for want of learning, or opportunities of inquiry, oi 
 from not having turned his studies this way, even so 
 much as to judge, whether particular prophecies have 
 been throughout completely fulfilled; yet he may see, 
 in general, that they have been fulfilled to such a degree, 
 as, upon very good ground, to be convinced of foresight 
 more than human in such prophecies, and of such events 
 being intended by them. For the same reason, also, 
 though by means of the deficiencies in civil history, and 
 the different accounts of historians, the most learned 
 should not be able to make out to satisfaction that such 
 parts of the prophetic history have been minutely and 
 throughout fulfilled ; yet a very strong proof of foresight 
 may arise from that general completion of them which 
 is made out : as much proof of foresight, perhaps, as the 
 Giver of prophecy intended should ever be afforded by 
 such parts of prophecy. 
 
 13. 2. A long series of prophecy being applicable to 
 
 such and such events, is itself a proof that it was intend- 
 
 ^ ,. ,„ ed of them ; as the rules by which we natu- 
 
 The applicabil- . \ 
 
 ity of a series rally judsre and determine, in common cases 
 
 of i>rophecles is ,,1 1 • -n 1 rr^i • 
 
 proof of intend- parallel to this. Will show. This observa- 
 
 cd application. . . . 
 
 tion I make in answer to the common od- 
 jection against the application of the prophecies, that 
 considering each of them distinctly by itself, it does not 
 at all appear that they were intended of those particular 
 events to which they are applied by Christians ; and 
 therefore it is to be supposed, that, if they meant any 
 thine, they were intended of other events unknown to 
 us. and not of these at all. 
 
CiiAi'-. VIl.J Evidence FOR Christianitv 309 
 
 Now there are two kinds of writing which bear a great 
 resemblance to prophecy, with respect to the matter 
 before us: the mythological and the satirical, where the 
 satire is, to a certain degree, concealed. And a man 
 might be assured that he understood what an author in- 
 tended by a fable or parable, related without any appli- 
 cition or moral, merely from seeing it to be easily capa- 
 ble of such application, and that such a moral might 
 naturally be deduced from it. And he might be fally 
 assured that such persons and events were intended in 
 a satirical writing, merely from its being applicable to 
 them. And agreeably to the last observation, he might 
 be in a good measure satisfied of it, though he were not 
 enough informed in affairs or in the story of such per- 
 sons, to understand half the satire. For, his satisfaction 
 that he understood the meaning, the intended meaning, 
 of these writings, would be greater or less, in proportion as 
 he saw the general turn of them to be capable of such 
 application, and in proportion to the number of partic- 
 ular things capable of it. And thus if a long series of 
 [)rophecy is applicable to the present state of the Church 
 and to the political situations of the kingdoms of the 
 world, some thousand years after these prophecies were 
 delivered, and a long series of prophecy delivered before 
 the coming of Christ is applicable to him; these things 
 are in themselves a proof that the prophetic history was 
 intended of him, and of those events: in proportion as 
 the general turn of it is capable of such application, and 
 to the number and variety of particular prophecies ca- 
 pable of it. And though in all just way of considera- 
 tion, the appearing completion of prophecies is to be 
 allowed to be thus explanatory of, and to determine 
 their meaning; yet it is to be remembered further, tliat 
 the ancient Jews applied the prophecies to a Messiah 
 before his coming, in much the same manner as Chris- 
 tians do now : and that the primitive Christians inter- 
 
3ro Analogy of Religion. [Part 11 
 
 preted the prophecies respecting the state of the Church 
 and of the world in the last ages, in the sense which the 
 event seems to confirm and verify. And from these 
 things it may be made to appear, 
 
 14. 3. That the showing even to a high probability, if 
 
 that could be, that the prophets thought of some othe; 
 
 events, in such and such predictions, and 
 
 Mistakes as _ ' , 
 
 to the meaninj? not those at all which Christians allege to 
 
 cf prophecy do , . . 
 
 rot weaken its be completions of those predictions ; or that 
 such and such prophecies are capable of be- 
 ing applied to other events than those to which Christians 
 apply them — that this would not confute or destroy the 
 force of the argument from prophecy, even with regard 
 to those very instances. For, observe how this matter 
 really is. If one knew such a person to be the sole author 
 of such a book, and was certainly assured, or satisfied 
 to any degree, that one knew the whole of what he in- 
 tended in it, one should be assured or satisfied to such 
 a degree, that one knew the whole meaning of that book ; 
 for the meaning of a book is nothing but the meaning 
 of the author. But if one knew a person to have com- 
 piled a book of memoirs which he received from anoth- 
 er of vastly superior knowledge in the subject of it, 
 especially if it were a book full of great intricacies and 
 difficulties, it would in nowise follow, that one knew the 
 whole meaning of the book from knowing the whole 
 meaning of the compiler; for the original memoirs, 
 that is, the author of them, might have, and there would 
 be no degree of presumption, in many cases, against 
 supposing him to have, some further meaning than the 
 compiler saw. To say, then, that the Scriptures and the 
 things contained in them can have no other or further 
 meaning than those persons thought or had who first 
 recited or wrote them, is evidently saying that those 
 persons were the original, proper, and sole authors of 
 those books, that is, that they are not inspired; which 
 
Cjiai'. VI 1. 1 Evidence for Christianity. 31 1 
 
 is absurd, while the authority of these books is under 
 examination, that is, till you have determined they are 
 of no divine authority at all. Till this be determined, 
 it must in all reason be supposed, not indeed that they 
 have, for this is taking for granted that they are inspired, 
 but that they may have some further meaning than what 
 (lie compilers saw or understood. And upon this sup- 
 position, it is supposable also that this further meaning 
 may be fulfilled. 
 
 Now events corresponding to prophecies, interpreted 
 in a different meaning from that in which the prophets 
 are supposed to have understood them ; this affords, in 
 a manner, the same proof that this different sense was 
 originally intended, as it would have afforded, if the 
 prophets had not understood their predictions in the 
 sense it is supposed they did ; because there is no pre- 
 sumption of their sense of them being the whole sense 
 of them. And it has been already shown, that the ap- 
 parent completions of prophecy must be allowed to be 
 explanatory of its meaning. So that the question is, 
 whether a series of prophecy has been fulfilled, in a 
 natural or proper, that is, in any real sense of the words 
 of it. For such completion is equally a proof of foresight 
 more than human, whether the prophets are, or are not, 
 supposed to have understood it in a different sense. I 
 say, supposed; for though I think it clear that the 
 prophets did not understand the full meaning of their 
 l)redictions, it is another question, how far they thought 
 they did, and in what sense they understood them. 
 
 15. Hence may be seen, to how little purpose those 
 persons busy themselves who endeavor to prove that 
 the prophetic history is applicable to events Fulfillment 
 of the age in which it was written, or 01 contmedtupi 
 ages before it. Indeed, to have proved this ^°'^^' 
 before there was any appearance of a further completion 
 of it, might have answered some purpose; for it might 
 
 not 
 
 :\iSt 
 
3^2 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 have prevented the expectation of any sucl. further com- 
 pletion. Thus, could Porphyry have sh^wn that some 
 principal parts of the Book of Daniel, for instance, the 
 seventh verse of the seventh chapter, which the Chris- 
 tians interpreted of the latter ages, was applicable to 
 events which happened before or about the age of An- 
 tiochus Epiphanes ; this might have prevented them 
 from expecting any further completion of it. And un- 
 less there was then, as I think there must have been, 
 external evidence concerning that book more than is 
 come down to us, such a discovery might have been a 
 stumbling-block in the way of Christianity itself; con- 
 sidering the authority which our Saviour has given to 
 the Book of Daniel, and how much the general scheme 
 of Christianity presupposes the truth of it. But even 
 this discovery, had there been any such,* would be of 
 very little weight with reasonable men now; if this pas- 
 sage, thus applicable to events before the age of Por- 
 phyry, appears to be applicable also to events which 
 succeeded the dissolution of the Roman empire. I 
 mention this, not at all as intending to insinuate that the 
 division of this empire into ten parts, for it plainly was 
 divided into about that number, were alone and by it- 
 self of any moment in verifying the prophetic history ; 
 but only as an example of the thing I am speaking of. 
 And thus, upon the whole, the matter of inquiry evi- 
 dently must be, as above put, Whether the prophecies 
 are applicable to Christ, and to the present state of the 
 world and of the Church ; applicable in such a dr^ree 
 
 * It appears that Porphyry did nothing worth mentioning in this 
 way. For Jerome on the place says : " Duas posteriores bestias — in 
 uno Macedonum regno ponit." And as to the ten kings: "Decern 
 reges enumerat, qui, fuerunt soevissimi ; ipsosque reges non unius 
 ponit regni, verbi gratia, Macedonise, Syriae, Asioe, et /Egypti ; sed de 
 diversis regnis unum efficit regum ordinem." And in this way of in- 
 terpretation, any thing may be made of any thing. 
 
Chap. VII. 1 Evidence for Christianity. 313 
 
 as to imply foresight': not whether they are capable 
 of any other application ; though I know no pretense 
 for saying the general turn of them is capable of any 
 other. 
 
 16. These observations are, I think, just, and the evi- 
 deQce referred to in them real; though there maybe 
 people who will not accept of such imper- T)efoct3inchar- 
 
 c ^ • c A.' r o"i. o 4. acter lessen the 
 
 feet information from Scripture. Some, too, po^ver of evi- 
 have not integrity and regard enough to truth ^®"*^®' 
 to attend to evidence which keeps the mind in doubt, per- 
 haps perplexity, and which is much of a different sort 
 from what they expected. And it plainly requires a de- 
 gree of modesty and fairness beyond what every one 
 has, for a man to say, not to the world, but to himself, 
 that there is a real appearance of somewhat of great 
 weight in this matter, though he is not able thoroughly 
 to satisfy himself about it ; but it shall have its influence 
 upon him, in proportion to its appearing reality and 
 weight. It is much more easy, and more falls in with 
 the negligence, presumption, and willfulness of the gen- 
 erality, to determine at once, with a decisive air, there 
 is nothing in it. The prejudices arising from that abso- 
 lute contempt and scorn with which this evidence is 
 treated in the world I do not mention. For what, in- 
 deed, can be said to persons who are weak enough in 
 their understandings to think this any presumption 
 against it ; or, if they do not, are yet weak enough in 
 their temper to be influenced by such prejudices, upon 
 such a subject .'* 
 
 :;. I shall now. Secondly^ Endeavor to give some ac- 
 f our.L of the general argument for the truth of Chris.. an- 
 ity, consistinGf both of the direct and cii- 
 
 -^ ' ^ , , General ai-ir"- 
 
 cumstantial evidence, considered as making nient. iicasons 
 
 for statin,;^ it. 
 
 Up one argument. Indeed, to state and ex- 
 amine this argument fully would be a work much be- 
 yond the compass of this whole treatise ; nor is so much 
 
314 Analogy of Religion. [Part li- 
 
 as a proper abridgment of it to be expected here. Yet 
 the present subject requires to have some brief account 
 of it given. For it is the kind of evidence upon which 
 most questions of difficulty, in common practice, are 
 determined ; evidence arising from various coincidences, 
 which support and confirm each other, and in this man- 
 ner prove, with more or less certainty, the point undei 
 consideration. And I choose to do it also : firsts be- 
 cause it seems to be of the greatest importance, and not 
 duly attended to by every one, that the proof of revela- 
 tion is, not some direct and express things only, but a 
 great variety of circumstantial things also ; and that 
 though each of these direct and circumstantial things is 
 indeed to be considered separately, yet they are after- 
 ward to be joined together; for that the proper force 
 of the evidence consists in the result of those several 
 things, considered in their respects to each other, and 
 united into one view; and, in the next place, because it 
 seems to me, that the matters of fact here set down, 
 which are acknowledged by unbelievers, must be ac- 
 knowledged by them also to contain together a degree 
 of evidence of great weight, if they could be brought to 
 lay these several things before themselves distinctly, 
 and then with attention consider them together; in- 
 stead of that cursory thought of them to which we are 
 familiarized. For being familiarized to the cursory 
 thought of things, as really hinders the weight of them 
 from being seen, as from having its due influence upon 
 practice. 
 
 1 8. The thing asserted, and the truth of which is to 
 'pe inquired into, is this : that over and above our rea- 
 Tno point to SOU and affections, which God has given us 
 be proved. p^j. ^|^g information of our judgment and the 
 
 conduct of our lives, he has also, by external revelation, 
 given us an account of himself and his moral govern- 
 ment over the world, implying a future state of rewards 
 
Chap. VI IJ Evidence for Christianity, 315 
 
 and punishments; that is, hath revealed the system of 
 natural religion ; for natural religion may be externally 
 (p3ge 194, etc.) revealed by God, as the ignorant may 
 be taught it by mankind, their fellow-creatures — that 
 God, I say, has given us the evidence of revelation, ,s 
 well as the evidence of reason, to ascertain this moral 
 system ; together with an account of a particular dis- 
 pensation of providence, which reason could no way 
 have discovered, and a particular institution of religion 
 founded on it, for the recovery of mankind out of their 
 present wretched condition, and raising them to the per- 
 fection and final happiness of their nature. 
 
 19. This revelation, whether real or supposed, may be 
 considered as wholly historical. For prophecy is noth- 
 ing but the history of events before they The revelation 
 
 , J . • 1 j.^ is historical. 
 
 come to pass ; doctrines, also, are matters 
 of fact; and precepts come under the same notion. 
 And the general design of Scripture, which contains in 
 it this revelation, thus considered as historical, may be 
 said to be, to give us an account of the world in this 
 one single view — as God's world ; by which it appears 
 essentially distinguished from all other books, so far as 
 I have found, except such as are copied from it. It be- 
 gins with an account of God's creation of the world, in 
 order to ascertain and distinguish from all others who 
 is the object of our worship by what he has done; in 
 order to ascertain v/ho he is concerning whose provi 
 d^nce, commands, promises, and threatenings, this sa- 
 cred book all along treats: the Maker and Proprietoi 
 of the world, he whose creatures we are, the God of 
 nature : in order likewise to distinguish him from the 
 idols of the nations, which are either imaginary beings, 
 that is, no beings at all; or else part of that treaticm; 
 the historical relcftion of which is here given. And St. 
 John, not improbably with an eye to this Mosaic account 
 of the creation, begins his gospel with an account of our 
 
3i6 Analogy of Religion.* [Part II. 
 
 Saviour's pre existence, and that " all things were made 
 by him, and without him was not any thing made that 
 was made," (John i, 3 ;) agreeably to tlie doctrine of St. 
 Paul, that " God created all things by Jesus Christ." 
 Kp]\. iii, 9. This being premised, the Scripture, taken 
 together, seems to profess to contain a kind of ar. 
 abridgment of the history of the world in the view just 
 now mentioned: that is, a general account of the con- 
 dition of religion and its professors during the continu- 
 ance of that apostasy from God, and state of wickedness 
 which it every-where supposes the world to lie in. 
 And this account of the state of religion carries with it 
 some brief account of the political state of things, as 
 religion is affected by it. Revelation, indeed, considers 
 the common affairs of this world, and what is going on 
 in it, as a mere scene of distraction, and cannot be sup- 
 posed to concern itself with foretelling at what time 
 Rome, or Babylon, or Greece, or any particular place, 
 should be the most conspicuous seat of that tyranny and 
 dissoluteness which all places equally aspire to be; can- 
 not, I say, be supposed to give any account of this wild 
 scene for its own sake. But it seems to contain some 
 very general account of the chief governments of the 
 world, as the general state of religion has been, is, or 
 shall be affected by them, from the first transgression, 
 and during the whole interval of the world's continuing 
 in its present state, to a certain future period, spoken of 
 both in the Old and New Testament, very distinctly, 
 and in great variety of expression; "The times of tne 
 resi'tution of all things," (Acts iii, 21 ;) when "the mys- 
 tery of God shall be finished, as he hath declared to his 
 servants the prophets," (Rev. x^ 7 ;) when " the God of 
 heaven shall set up a kingdom which shall never be de- 
 stroyed ; and the kingdom shall not be left to other peo- 
 ple," (Dan. ii, 44,) as it is represented to be during this 
 apostasy, but "judgment shall be given to the saints," 
 
Chap. V.II.] Evidexce for Chrtsttamtv. 317 
 
 (Dan. vii, 22,) and "they shall reign," (Rev xxii, 5 ;) 
 **and the kingdom and dominion, and the greatness of 
 the kingdom under the whole heaven, shall be given to 
 the people of the saints of "the Most High." Dan. vii, 27. 
 20. Upon this general view of the Scripture, 1 would 
 remark, how great a length of time the whole relation 
 takes up, near six thousand years of wrich The icm ih oi 
 
 J 1 . • 4. r 1.1 • "i. time and variety 
 
 lie past : and how great a variety of things it of topics inciud- 
 treats of; the natural and moral system or ^* 
 history of the world, including the time when it was 
 formed, all contained in the very first book, and evi- 
 dently written in a rude and unlearned age ; and in 
 subsequent books, the various common and prophetic 
 history, and the particular dispensation of Christianity. 
 Now all this together gives the largest scope for criti- 
 cism ; and for confutation of what is capable of being 
 confuted, either from reason, or from common history, 
 or from any inconsistence in its several parts. And it 
 is a thing which deserves, I think, to be mentioned, that 
 whereas some imagine the supposed doubtfulness of the 
 evidence for revelation implies a positive argument that 
 it is not true; it appears, on the contrary, to imply a 
 positive argument that it is true. For could any com- 
 mon relation, of such antiquity, extent, and variety, (for 
 in these things the stress of what 1 am now observing 
 lies,) be proposed to the examination of the world; that 
 it could not, in an age of knowledge and liberty, be 
 confuted, or shown to have nothing in it, to the satisfac- 
 tion of reasonable men ; this would be thought a strong 
 presumptive proof of its truth. And, indeed, it must 
 be a proof of it, just in proportion to the probability, 
 that if it were false it might be shown to be so ; and 
 this, I think, is scarce pretended to be shown, but upon 
 principles and in ways of arguing which have been 
 clearly obviated. (Chap, ii, iii, etc.) Nor does it at all 
 appear that any set of men who believe natural religion 
 
3i8 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 are of the opinion that Christianity has been thus con- 
 ''uted. But to proceed : — 
 
 21. Together with the moral system of the world, the 
 Old Testament contains a chronological account of the 
 beginning of it, and from thence, an unbroken 
 genealogy of mankind for many ages before 
 common history begins ; and carried on as much furtner 
 as to make up a continued thread of history of the 
 length of between three and four thousand years. It 
 contains an account of God's making a covenant with a 
 particular nation, that they should be his people, and 
 he would be their God, in a peculiar sense ; of his often 
 interposing miraculously in their affairs; giving them 
 the promise, and, long after, the possession, of a partic- 
 ular country; assuring them of the greatest national 
 prosperity in it, if they would worship him, in opposi- 
 tion to the idols which the rest of the world worshiped, 
 and obey his commands, and threatening them with un- 
 exampled punishments if they disobeyed him, and fell 
 into the general idolatry ; insomuch, that this one nation 
 should continue to be the observation and the wonder 
 of all the world. It declares particularly, that " God 
 would scatter them among all people, from one end 
 of the earth unto the other;" but that "when they 
 should return unto the Lord their God, he would have 
 compassion upon them, and gather them, from all the 
 nations whither he had scattered them ; that Israel 
 should be saved in the Lord, with an everlasting salva- 
 tion, and not be ashamed or confounded, world without 
 end." And as some of those promises are conditional^ 
 others are as absolute as any thing can be expressed, that 
 the time should come when " the people should be all 
 righteous, and inherit the land forever; that though 
 God would make a full end of all nations whither he 
 had scattered them, yet would he not make a full end 
 of them : that hcwpuld bring again the captivity of his 
 
Chap. VII.] Evidence for Christianity. 319 
 
 people Israel, and plant them upon their land, and they 
 should be no more pulled up out of their land; that the 
 seed of Israel should not cease from being a nation for- 
 ever."* It foretells that God would raise thein up a 
 , particular person, in whom all his promises should final- 
 ly be fulfilled; the Messiah, who should be, in a hi^b 
 and eminent sense, their anointed Prince and Savioui 
 This was foretold in such a manner as raised a general 
 expectation of such a person in the nation, as appears 
 from the New Testament, and is an acknowledged fact 
 an expectation of his coming at such a particular time, 
 before any one appeared claiming to be that person, and 
 when there was no ground for such an expectation but 
 from the prophecies; which expectation, therefore, must 
 in all reason be presumed to be explanatory of those 
 prophecies, if there were any doubt about their mean- 
 ing. It seems, moreover, to foretell that this person 
 should be rejected by that nation to whom he had been 
 so long promised, and though he was so much desired 
 by them.f And it expressly foretells, that he should be 
 the Saviour of the Gentiles ; and even that the comple- 
 tion of the scheme contained in this book, and then be- 
 gun and in its progress, should be somewhat so great, 
 that, in comparison with it, the restoration of the Jews 
 alone would be but of small account : ** It is a light 
 thing that thou shouldst be my servant to raise up the 
 tribes of Jacob, and to restore the preserved of Israel : 
 I will also give thee for a light to the Gentiles, that tho.i 
 mayest be for salvation unto the end of the earth. * 
 And, " In the last days, the mountain of the Lord's 
 liouse shall be established in the top of the mountains, 
 and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nation? 
 shall flow into it — for out of Zion shall go forth the law, 
 
 * Deut. xxviii, 64; xxx, 2, 3; Isa. xlv, 17 ; Ix, 21 ; Jer. xxx, II} 
 xlvi, 28 ; Amos ix, 15 ; Jer. xxxi, 36. 
 
 t Tsa. "iii. 14, 15 ; xlix. 5 ; liii ; M.il. i. to. it, nnd iii. 
 
320 Analogy of Religion. - [Part II. 
 
 and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem. And hd 
 shall judge among the nations — and the Lord alone 
 shall be exalted in that day, and the idols he shall nt 
 terly abolish."* The Scripture further contains an 
 account, that at the time the Messiah was expected a 
 person rose up in this nation claiming to be that Mcs-* 
 siah, to be the person whom all the pro}>hets referred to, 
 and in whom they should center; that he spent some 
 years in a continued course of miraculous works, and 
 endued his immediate disciples and followers with a 
 power of doing the same, as a proof of the truth of that 
 religion which he commissioned them to publish, that, 
 invested with this authority and power, they made 
 numerous converts in the remotest countries, and set- 
 tled and established his religion in the world ; to the 
 end of which the Scripture professes to give a prophetic 
 account of the state of this religion among mankind. 
 
 22. Let us now suppose a person, utterly ignorant of 
 history, to have all this related to him out of the Script- 
 ure. Or, suppose, such* a one, havinsr the 
 
 Facts submit- . ^. . ° 
 
 ted to a candid Scripture put mto his hands, to remark these 
 
 inquirer. . . . 111 
 
 thmgs m It, not knowing but that the whole, 
 even its civil history, as well as the other parts of it, 
 might be, from beginning to end, an entire invention ; 
 and to ask, What truth was in it, and whether the reve- 
 lation here related was real or a fiction ? And instead 
 of a direct answer, suppose him, all at once, to be told 
 the following confessed facts, and then to unite them 
 into one view. 
 
 Let him first be told, in how great a degree ihe prO' 
 fession and establishment of natural religion, the belief 
 that there is one God to be worshiped, that virtue is his 
 
 * I«a. xlix, 6 ; ii ; xi ; Ivi, 7 ; Mai. i, ii. To which must be add- 
 ed the other prophecies, of .the like kind, several in the New Testa- 
 ment, and very many in the Old, which describe what shall b^ the 
 completion of the revealed plan of Providence. 
 
 # 
 
Chap. VI 1.1 Evidence for Christianity. 321 
 
 law, and that mankind shall be rewarded and punished 
 hereafter, as they obey and disobey it here : Truths ori?ri- 
 
 •' •' •' nated by revela- 
 
 in how very great a degree, I say, the pro- tion. itsimpor- 
 
 - . ,,,., ri- , tance and au- 
 
 fession and establishment of this moral sys- thority. 
 tem in the world is owing to the revelation, whether 
 real or supposed, contained in this book ; the establish- 
 ment of this moral system, even in those countries 
 which do not acknowledge the proper authority of the 
 Scripture. (Page 274.) Let him be told also what num- 
 ber of nations do acknowledge its proper authority. 
 Let him then take in the consideration, of what impor- 
 tance religion is to mankind. And upon these things 
 he might, I think, truly observe, that this supposed rev- 
 elation's obtaining and being received in the world, with 
 all the circumstances and effects of it, considered to- 
 gether as one event, is the most conspicuous and im- 
 portant event in the story of mankind : that a book of 
 this nature, and thus promulged and recommended to 
 our consideration, demands, as if by a voice from heaven, 
 to have its claims most seriously examined into ; and 
 that before such examination, to treat it with any kind 
 of scofiing and ridicule is an offense against natural piety. 
 But it is to be remembered, that how much soever the 
 establishment of natural religion in the world is owing 
 to the Scripture revelation, this doe's not destroy the 
 proof of religion from reason ; any more than the proof 
 of Euclid's Elei7ients is destroyed by a man's knowing, 01 
 thinking) that he should never have seen the truth of 
 the several propositions contained in it, nor had thost 
 propositions come into his thoughts but for that math- 
 ematician. 
 
 25. Let such a person as we are speaking of be, in 
 the next place, informed of the acknowl- its antiquity 
 edged antiquity of the first parts of this ^ISdac^ed: 
 book; and that its chronology, its account '^'®" 
 of the time when the earth and the several parts of it 
 
332 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 were fir t peopled with human creatures is no way con- 
 tradicted, but is really confirmed, by the natural and 
 civil history of the world, collected from common his- 
 torians, from the state of the earth, and from the late in- 
 vention of arts and sciences. And as the Scripture con 
 tains an unbroken thread of common and civil history, 
 from the creation to the captivity, for between three and 
 four thousand years ; let the person we are speaking of 
 be told, in the next place, that this general history, as it 
 is not contradicted, but is confirmed, by profane his- 
 tory, as much as there would be reason to expect upon 
 supposition of its truth ; so there is nothing in the whole 
 history itself to give any reasonable ground of suspicion 
 of its not being, in the general, a faithful and literally 
 true genealogy of men, and series of things. I speak 
 here only of the common Scripture history, or of the 
 course of ordinary events related in it, as distinguished 
 from miracles, and from the prophetic history. In all the 
 Scripture narrations of this kind, following events arise 
 out of foregoing ones, as in all other histories. There 
 appears nothing related as done in any age, not con- 
 formable to the manners of that age ; nothing in the 
 account of a succeeding age, which one would say could 
 not be true, or was improbable, from the account of 
 things in the preceding one. There is nothing in the 
 characters Avhich would raise a thought of their being 
 feigned; but all the internal marks imaginable of their 
 being real. It is to be added, also, that mere genealo- 
 gies, bare narratives of the number of years which per- 
 sons called by such and such names lived, do not carry 
 the face of fiction; perhaps do carry some presump- 
 tion of veracity : and all unadorned narratives, which 
 have nothing to surprise, may be thought to carry some- 
 what of the like presumption too. And the domestic 
 and the political history is plainly credible. There may 
 be incidents in ^rrinttire. . vbich, taken alone in the 
 
Chap. V'll.] Evidence for Christianity. 32^5 
 
 naked way they are told, may appear strange, especij.lly 
 to persons of other manners, temper, education; but 
 there are also incidents of undoubted truth, in many or 
 most persons' lives, which, in the same circumstances, 
 would appear to the full as strange.* There may be 
 mistakes of transcribers, there may be other real or 
 seeming mistakes, not easy to be particularly accounted 
 for; but there are certainly no more things of this kind 
 in the Scripture than what were to have been expected 
 in books of such antiquity ; and nothing, in any wise, 
 sufficient to discredit the general narrative. Now, that 
 a history claiming to commence from the creation, and 
 extending in one continued series through so great a 
 length of time, and variety of events, should have such 
 appearances of reality and truth in its whole contexture, 
 is surely a very remarkable circumstance in its favor. 
 And as all this is applicable to the common history of 
 the New Testament, so there is a further credibility, and 
 a very high one, given to it by profane authors ; many 
 
 * [See this thought presented in a most agreeable and lively form 
 in the Archbishop of Dublin's *' Historic Doubts" concerning Napo- 
 leon Bonaparte. Compare the following conversation given in Bos- 
 well'b Life of Johnson, (ann. 1763 :) *' Talking of those who deny the 
 truth of Christianity, he said, ' It is always easy to be on the negative 
 side. ... I deny that Canada is taken, and I can support my denial by 
 pretty good arguments. The French are a much more numerous 
 people than we, and it is not likely that they would allow us to take 
 it.' ' But the ministry have assured us, in all the formality of a Ga- 
 zet v that it is taken.* 'Very true. But the ministry have put us to 
 an ^.lormous expense by the war in America, and it is their interest 
 to /ersuade us that we have got something for our money.' * But the 
 fact is confirmed by thousands of men who were at the taking of 
 it.' 'Aye, but these men have still more interest in deceiving us. 
 Thev don't want that you should think the French have beat them, 
 but that they have beat the French. Now, suppose you should go 
 over and find that it really is taken ; that would only satisfy yourself- 
 for when you come liack vve will not believe you. We will say yob 
 h.ivc 1->^en bribel.'"— F] . 
 
J 24 Analogy of Religion. [Part II, 
 
 of these uriti-ng of the same times, and confirming the 
 ^ruth of customs and events which are incidentally, as 
 well as more purposely mentioned in it. And this cred- 
 ibility of the common Scripture history gives some cred- 
 ibility to its miraculous history: especially as this is 
 interwoven with the common, so as that they imply each 
 other, and both together make up one relation. 
 
 24. Let ic then" be more particularly observed to this 
 
 person, that it is an acknowledged matter 
 
 Antiquity of the ^ ... . . 7 
 
 Jews whose re- of fact, which is indeed implied in the fore- 
 
 ligion preserved . ... 
 
 their national gomg observation, that there was such a na- 
 
 exi&tence. . , . . 
 
 tion as the Jews,, of tne greatest antiquity, 
 whose government and general polity was founded on 
 the law here related to be given them by Moses as from 
 heaven : that natural religion, though with rites addi- 
 tional, yet no way contrary to it, was their established 
 religion, which cannot be said of the Gentile world ; 
 and that their very being, as a nation, depended upon 
 their acknowledgment of one God, the God of the uni- 
 verse. For suppose, in their captivity in Babylon, they 
 had gone over to the religion of their conquerors, there 
 would have remained no bond of union to keep them a 
 distinct people. And while they were under their own 
 kings in their own country, a total apostasy from God 
 would have been the dissolution of their whole govern- 
 ment. They, in such a sense, nationally acknowledged 
 and worshiped the Maker of heaven and earth, when 
 the rest of the world were sunk in idolatry, as rendered 
 them, in fact, the peculiar people of God. And this, so 
 remarkable an establishment and preservation of natural 
 religion among them, seems to add some peculiar credi- 
 bility to the historical evidence for the miracles of Moses 
 and the piophets; because these miracles are a full, sat- 
 isfactory account of this event, which plainly wants to 
 be accounted for, and cannot otherwise. 
 
 25. Let this person, supposed wliolly ignornnt of his- 
 
 i 
 
Chap. VI 1. 1 Evidence for CHRisTiANiry. 325 
 
 tory, be acquainted further, that one claiming to be the 
 Messiah, of Jewish extraction, rose up at the time when 
 this nation, from the prophecies above-men- ^j^^^j^^ ^^^^e, 
 tioned, expected the Messiah: that he- was and. a cording 
 
 ' i .to propm cy,?!!!- 
 
 *-ciected, as it seemed to have been foretold fered and tri- 
 
 ■' ' umphcd. 
 
 he should, by the body of the people, under 
 the direction of their rulers : that in the course of a very 
 few years he was believed on, and acknowledged as the 
 promised Messiah, by great numbers among the Gentiles, 
 agreeably to the prophecies of Scripture, yet not upon 
 the evidence of prophecy, but of miracles, (page 297, etc.,) 
 of which miracles we also have strong historical evi- 
 dence ; (by which I mean here no more than must be 
 acknowledged by unbelievers ; for let pious frauds and 
 follies be admitted to weaken, it is absurd to say they 
 destroy, our evidence of miracles wrought in proof of 
 Christianity, (page 305, etc. ;) that this religion approv- 
 ing itself to the reason of mankind, and carrying its own 
 evidence with it, so far as reason is v judge of its sys- 
 tem, and being no way contrary to reason in those parts 
 of it which require to be believed upon the mere au- 
 thority of its Author; that this religion, I say, gradually 
 spread and supported itself for some hundred years, not 
 only without any assistance from temporal power, but 
 under constant discouragements, and often the bitterest 
 persecutions from it, and then became the religion of 
 the world : that in the mean time, the Jewish nation 
 and government were destroyed in a very remarkable 
 manner, and the people carried away captive and dis- 
 persed through the most distant countries, in which 
 stite of dispersion they have remained fifteen hundred 
 years: and that they remain a numerous people, united 
 amcng themselves, and distinguished from the rest of 
 the world, as they were in the days of Moses, by tlie 
 profession of his law; and every-where looked upon in 
 a manner, which one scarce knows how distinctly to 
 
326 Analogy OF Religion. [Part 1 1. 
 
 * 
 
 express, but in the words of the prophetic account of it, 
 
 given so many ages before it came to pass : " Thou shalt 
 
 become an astonishment, a proverb and a by-word, 
 
 among all nations whither the Lord shall lead thee." 
 
 Deut. xxviii, 37. 
 
 26. The appearance of a standing miracle, in the Te\^ & 
 remaining a distinct people in their dispersion, and the 
 
 The Jews pre- Confirmation which this event appears to 
 tfncT^p^opie^'^' give to the truth of revelation, may be 
 This a miracle, thought to be answered by their religion's 
 forbidding them intermarriages with those of any other, 
 and prescribing them a great many peculiarities in their 
 food, by which they are debarred from the means of in- 
 corporating with the people in whose countries they 
 live. This is not, I think, a satisfactory account of that 
 which it pretends to account for. But what does it pre- 
 tend to account for.? The correspondence between this 
 event and the prophecies; or the coincidence of both, 
 with a long dispensation of providence of a peculiar na- 
 ture toward that people formerly.? No. It is only the 
 •event itself which is offered to be thus accounted for; 
 which single event, taken alone, abstracted from all such 
 correspondence and coincidence, perhaps would not 
 have appeared miraculous; but that correspondence 
 and coincidence may be so, though the event itself be 
 supposed not. Thus, the concurrence of our Saviour's 
 being born at Bethlehem with a long foregoing series of 
 prophecy, and other coincidences, is doubtless miracu- 
 lous — the series of prophecy, and other coincidences, 
 and the event, being admitted : though the event itself, 
 his birth at that place, appears to have been brought 
 about in a natural way ; of which, however, no one can 
 be certain. 
 
 27. ^ndas several of these events seem, in some degree, 
 expressly to have verified the prophetic history already ; 
 so likewise, they may be considered further, as having a 
 
CfiAP.VIIJ Evidence FOR Christianity. 327 
 
 peculiar aspect toward the full completion of it ; as af- 
 fording some presumption that the whole of The past fuiaii- 
 it shall, one time or other, be fulfilled. rcrreDdo''r^*'the 
 Thus, that the Jews have been so wonder- f'lture proi.abie. 
 fully preserved in their long and wide dispersion ; which 
 is indeed the direct fulfilling of some prophecies, but is 
 now mentioned only as looking forward to somewhat yet 
 to come; that natural religion came forth from Judea, 
 and spread in the degree it has done over the world, be- 
 fore lost in idolatry ; which, together with some other 
 things, have distinguished that very place, in like man- 
 ner as the people of it are distinguished : that this great 
 change of religion over the earth was brought about un- 
 der the profession and acknowledgment that Jesus was 
 the promised Messiah : things of this kind naturally turn 
 the thoughts of serious men toward the full completion 
 of the prophetic history, concerning the final restoration 
 of that people; concerning the establishment of the 
 everlasting kingdom among them, the kingdom of the 
 Messiah ; and the future state of the world under this 
 sacred government. Such circumstances and events, 
 compared with these prophecies, though no completions 
 of them, yet would not, I think, be spoken of as nothing 
 in the argument by a person upon his first being in- 
 formed of them. They fall in with the prophetic history 
 of things still future, give it some additional credibility, 
 have the appearance of being somewhat in order to the 
 full completion of it. 
 
 Indeed, it requires a good degree of knowledge, and 
 great calmness and consideration, to be able to judge 
 thoroughly of the evidence for the truth of Christianity 
 from that part of the prophetic history which relates to 
 the situation of the kingdoms of the world, and to the 
 state of the Church from the establishment of Christian- 
 ity to the present time. But it appears, from a general 
 view of it, to be very material. And those persons who 
 
328 Analogy of Religicn. [Part H. 
 
 have thoroughly examined it, and some of them were 
 
 men of the coolest tempers, greatest capacities, and least 
 
 liable to imputations of prejudice, insist upon it as de- 
 
 terminately conclusive. 
 
 28. Suppose now a person quite ignorant of history, 
 
 first to recollect the passages above-mentioned out of 
 
 , , Scripture without knowing but that the 
 
 RecapitnUtion. ' • • j 
 
 whole was a late fiction, then to be mformed 
 
 of the correspondent facts now mentioned, and to unite 
 them all into one view : that the profession and estab- 
 lishment of natural religion in the world is greatly ow- 
 ing, in different ways, to this book, and the supposed 
 revelation which it contains ; that it is acknowledged to 
 be of the earliest antiquity; that its chronology and 
 common history are entirely credible; that this ancient 
 nation, the Jews, of whom it chiefly treats, appear to 
 have been, in fact, the people of God in a distinguished 
 sense; that, as there was a national expectation among 
 them, raised from the prophecies, of a Messiah to ap- 
 pear at such a time, so one at this time appeared claim- 
 ing to be that Messiah ; that he was rejected by this 
 nation but received by the Gentiles, not upon the evi- 
 dence of prophecy, but of miracles ; that the religion he 
 'taught. supported itself under the greatest difficulties, 
 gained ground, and at length became the religion of the 
 world; that in the meantime the Jewish polity was ut- 
 terly destroyed, and the nation dispersed over the face 
 of the earth ; that, notwithstanding this, they have re- 
 mained a distinct and numerous people for so many 
 centuries, even to this day ; which not only appears to 
 be the express completion of several prophecies concern- 
 ing them, but also renders it, as one may speak, a visible 
 and easy possibility that the promises made to them as 
 a nation may yet be fulfilled. And to these acknowl- 
 edged truths, let the person we have been supposing 
 add, as I think he ought, whether every one will allow 
 
 4 
 
Chap. VII.] Evidence FOR Christianity. 329 
 
 it or not, the obvious appearances which there are of 
 the state of the world, in other respects besides A\hat re- 
 lates to the Jews, and of the Christian Church, having 
 so long answered, and still answering to the prophetic 
 history. Suppose, I say, these facts set over against the 
 things before-mentioned out of the Scripture, and seri- 
 ously com^nred with them; tlie joint view of both to- 
 gether must, I think, appear of very great weight to a 
 considerate, reasonable person ; of much greater, indeed, 
 upon having them first laid before him than is easy .for 
 us, who are so familiarized to them, to conceive, without 
 some particular attention for that purpose. 
 
 29. All these things, and the several particulars con- 
 tained under them, require to be distinctly These points 
 and most thoroughly examined into; that dai^ considera- 
 the weight of each may be judged of, upon ^*^"' 
 such examination, and such conclusion drawn as re- 
 sults from their united force. But this has not been at- 
 tempted here. I have gone no further than to show, 
 that the general imperfect view of them now given, the 
 confessed historical evidence for miracles, and the many 
 obvious appearing completions of prophecy, together 
 with the collateral things* here mentioned, and there 
 are several- others of the like sort ; that all this together, 
 which, beincr fact, must be acknowledsred by „ 
 
 ° . Necessary con- 
 
 uiibelievers, amounts to real evidence of cessions of \m- 
 
 bclicvGrs 
 
 'oomewhat more than human in this matter; 
 evidence much more important than careless men, who 
 have been accustomed only to transient and partial 
 /ieu's of it, can imagine; and, indeed, abur.dantly suffi- 
 cr:nt to act upon. And these things, I appiehend, must 
 be acknowledged by unbelievers. For though they may 
 say that the historical evidence of miracles, wrought in 
 
 * All tlie particular things mentioned in this chapter, not reilucible 
 to the head of certain miracles, or determinate completions of proph- 
 ccj See pa^jes 292, 293. 
 
33^ Analogy OF Rt.ligion. [Part II. 
 
 attestation of Christianity, is not sufficient to convince 
 them that such miracles were really wrought, they can- 
 not deny that there is such historical evidence, it being 
 a known matter of fact that there is. They may say, the 
 conformity between the prophecies and events is by ac- 
 cident : but there are many instances in which :ucb 
 conformity itself cannot be denied. They may say, with 
 regard to such kind of collateral things as those above- 
 mentioned, that any odd accidental events, without 
 meaning, will have a meaning found in them by fanciful 
 people ; and that such as are fanciful in any one certain 
 way, will make out a thousand coincidences which seem 
 to favor their peculiar follies. Men, I say, may talk 
 thus; but no one who is serious can possibly think these 
 things to be nothing, if he considers the importance of 
 collateral things, and even of lesser circumstances, in 
 the evidence of probability, as distinguished in nature 
 from the evidence of demonstration. In many cases, 
 indeed, it seems to require the truest judgment to de- 
 termine with exactness the weight of circumstantial evi- 
 dence; but it is very often altogether as convincing as 
 that which is the most express and direct. 
 
 30. This general view of the evidence for Christianity, 
 
 considered as making one argument, may also serve to 
 
 , , recommend to serious persons to set down 
 
 Force of the . . *^ . 
 
 proof from the every thing which they think may be of any 
 
 combination of . . . . 
 
 these cousidera- real weight at all m proof of It, and partic- 
 
 tions. Ill • ^ • r 
 
 ularly the many seemmg completions of 
 prophecy : and they will find, that, judging by the nat- 
 ural rules by which we judge of probable evidence ii\ 
 common matters, they amount to a much higher degree 
 of proof, upon such a joint review, than could be sup- 
 posed upon considering them separately, at different 
 times, how strong soever the proof might before appear 
 to them upon such separate views of it. For probable 
 proofs, by being added, not only increase the evidence, 
 
Chap. VII.] Evidence for Christianity. 331 
 
 Dut multiply it.* Nor should I dissuade any one from 
 setting down what he thought made lor the contrary 
 side. But, then, it is to be remembered, not in order to 
 influence his judgment but his practice, that a mistake 
 on one side may be, in its consequences, much more 
 dangerous than a mistake on the other. And what 
 corrse is most safe, and what most dangerous, is a con- 
 sideration thought very material, when we deliberate 
 not concerning events, but concerning conduct in oui 
 temporal affairs. To be influenced by this considera- 
 tion fn our jrdgment, to believe or disbelieve upon it, is 
 indeed as utjcIi prejudice as any thing whatever. And 
 like other prejudices, it operates contrary ways in differ- 
 ent men. ffor some are inclined to believe what they 
 hope, and others what they fear. And it is manifest 
 unreasona) ieness to apply to men's passions in order to 
 gain their assent. But in deliberations concerning 
 conduct, ( here is nothing which reason more requires 
 to be take i into the account, than the importance of it. 
 For suppc ^e it doubtful what would be the consequence 
 of acting in this, or in a contrary manner; still, that 
 takins; on ; side could be attended with little or no bad 
 consequc'.ces, and taking the other might be attended 
 with tbe ff-.reatest, must appear to unprejudiced reason 
 of the hi'^hest moment toward determining how we are 
 to act. .>^ut the truth of our religion, like the truth of 
 
 * [If the ♦hing to be proved have in it an apparent character of 
 tnilh, this 'institutes an improbability of its falsehood. If it have 
 another c})"racter of truth, this constitutes another improbability of 
 its falschor^. If this were a complete statement of the argumept to 
 be drawn »rom the coexistence of the two characters of truth, the 
 second im'irobability would only require tO be added to the first to 
 give the value of the v/hole. But in reality the argument is much 
 stronger. For the improbability that they should suuzt/^a^icot/s/j' ex- 
 ist in the vhing under examination, and yet that thing be false, is evi- 
 dently dinerent from the sum of the improbabilities that each se/>^- 
 rately should exist in i' if false. — F.] 
 
332 Analogy of Religion, [Part 11. 
 
 common matters, is to be judged of by all the evidence 
 taken together. And unless the whole series of things 
 which may be alleged in this argument, and every particu- 
 lar thing in it, can reasonably be supposed to have been 
 by accident, (for here the stress of the argument for Chris- 
 tianity lies,) then is the truth of it proved; in like man- 
 ner as if, in any common case, numerous events ac- 
 knowledged were to be alleged in proof of any other 
 event disputed ; the truth of the disputed event would 
 be proved, not only if any one of the acknowledged 
 ones did of itself clear,ly imply it, but though no one of 
 them singly did so, if the whole of the acknowledged 
 events taken together, could not in reason be supposed 
 to have happened unless the disputed one were true. 
 
 It is obvious, how much advantage the nature of this 
 evidence gives to those persons who attack Christian- 
 ity, especially in conversation. For it is easy to show, 
 in a short and lively manner, that such and such things 
 are liable to objection, that this and another thing is of 
 little weight in itself; but impossible to show, in like 
 manner, the united force of the whole argument in one 
 view. 
 
 31. However, lastly^ as it has been made appear that 
 there is no presumption against a revelation as miracu- 
 lous; that the sfeneral scheme of Christian- 
 Christian evi- . . . 
 dence canuot be ity, and the principal parts of it, are con- 
 destroyed /. 1 1 1 • 1 ' • r 
 
 formable to the experienced constitution of 
 things, and the whole perfectly credible; so the account 
 now given of the positive evidence for it shows that thi.'^ 
 evidence is such as, from the nature of it, cannot be 
 destroyed, though it should be lessened. 
 
Chap. VIIIJ Objections against Analogy. 333 
 
 CHAPTER VIII. 
 
 OF THE OBJECTIONS WHICH MAY BE MADE AGAINST 
 ARGUING FROM THE ANALOGY OF NATURE TO RE- 
 LIGION. 
 
 IF every one would consider, with such attention as 
 they are bound, even in point of morality, to consider, 
 \^ hat they judge and give characters of, the occasion of 
 this chapter would be, in some good measure at least 
 superseded. But since this is not to be expected ; for 
 some we find do not concern themselves to understand 
 even what they write against ; since this treatise, in 
 common with most others, lies open to objections which 
 may appear very material to thoughtful men at first 
 sight; and, besides that, seems peculiarly liable to the 
 objections of such as can judge without thinking, and 
 of such as can censure without judging; it may not be 
 amiss to set down the chief of these objections which 
 occur to me, and consider them to their hands. And 
 they are such as these : — 
 
 2. " That it is a poor thing to solve difficulties in rev- 
 elation by saying that there are the same in natural re- 
 ligion ; when what is wanting? is to clear 
 
 , , ' , r ^ ^ • ^^^« objections. 
 
 both of them, of these their common, as 
 well as other their respective difficulties : but that it is a 
 strange way indeed of convincing men of the obligations 
 of religion, to show them that they have as little reason 
 for their worldly pursuits; and a strange way of vindi- 
 cating the justice and goodness of the Author of nature, 
 and of removing the objections against both, to which 
 the system of religion lies open, to show that .the like 
 
334 Analogy of Religion. [Part II, 
 
 objections lie against natural providence; a way of an- 
 swering objections against religion, without so much as 
 pretending to make out that the system of it, or the 
 particular things in it objected against, are reasonable — 
 especially, perhaps, some may be inattentive enough to 
 add, must this be thought strange, when it is confessed 
 that analogy is no answer to such objections ; that when 
 this sort of reasoning is carried to the utmost length it 
 can be imagined capable of, it will yet leave the mind in 
 a very unsatisfied state : and that it must be unaccounta- 
 ble ignorance of mankind, to imagine they will be pre- 
 vailed with to forego their present interests and pleas- 
 ures, from regard to religion, upon doubtful evidence." 
 
 Now, as plausible as this way of talking may appear, 
 that appearance will be found in a great measure owing 
 to half views, which show but part of an object, yet 
 show that indistinctly ; and to undeterminate language. 
 By these means weak men are often deceived by others, 
 and ludicrous men by themselves. And even those who 
 are serious and considerate cannot always readily dis- 
 entangle, and at once clearly see through, the perplexities 
 in which subjects themselves are involved : and which 
 are heightened by the deficiencies and the abuse of 
 words. To this latter sort of persons the following re- 
 ply to each part of this objection severally may be of 
 some assistance, as it may also tend a little to stop 
 and silence others. 
 
 3. First. The thing wanted, that is, what men require, 
 is to have all difficulties cleared. And this is, or at least 
 Answer to the foi* ^^y thing wc know to the contrary, it 
 uy*th?*Sde" of ™^y be, the same as requiring to compre- 
 ties!"^^wS°is hend the Divine nature, and the whole plan 
 wanted. Qf Providence from everlasting to eve rLi st- 
 
 ing. But it hath always been allowed to argue, from 
 what is acknowledged to what is disputed. And it is in 
 no other sense a poor thing to argue from natural relig- 
 
Chap. VIII.] Objections against Analogy. 335 
 
 ion to revealed, in the manner found fault with, than it 
 is to argue in numberless other ways of probable deduc- 
 tion and inference in matters of conduct, which we are 
 continually reduced to the necessity of doing. Indeed 
 the epithet poor may be applied, I fear, as properly to 
 great part, or the whole, of human life, as it is to the 
 things mcQtioned in the objection. Is it not a poor 
 thing for a physician to have so little knowledge in the 
 cure of diseases as even the most eminent have? to act 
 upon conjecture and guess where the life of man is 
 concerned .•* Undoubtedly it is : but not in comparison 
 of having no skill at all in that useful art, and being 
 obliged to act wholly in the dark. 
 
 4. Further : since it is as unreasonable as it is com- 
 mon to urge objections against revelation which are of 
 equal weidit against natural religion ; and 
 
 , 1 J f- -r 1 Objections 
 
 those who do this, if they are not confuted against reveia- 
 
 , , J r • 1 '1 • ^*^" ^^ stron? 
 
 themselves, deal unfairly with others m aarainst natural 
 
 , . ., 11 . , religion. 
 
 making it seem that they are arguing only 
 against revelation, or particular doctrines of it, when in 
 reality they are arguing against moral providence ; it is 
 a thing of consequence to show, that such objections are 
 as much leveled against natural religion as against re- 
 vealed. And objections which are equally applicable 
 to both, are, properly speaking, answered by its being 
 shown that they are so, provided the former be admit- 
 ted to be true. And without taking in the considera- 
 tion how distinctly this is admitted, it is plainly very 
 material to observe, that as the things objected against 
 in natural religion are of the same kind with what is 
 Certain matter of experience in the course of providence, 
 and in the information which God affords us concerning 
 our temporal interest under his government; so the ob- 
 jections against the system of Christianity and the evi- 
 dence of it are of the very same kind with those which 
 are made against the system and evidence of natural 
 
336 Analogy of Religion. [Part TI. 
 
 religion. However, the reader, upon review, may see 
 that most of the analogies insisted upon, even in the 
 latter part of this treatise, do not necessarily require to 
 have more taken for granted than is in the former ; thai 
 there is an Author of nature, or natural Governor of the 
 world : and Christianity is vindicated, not from its anal- 
 ogy to natural religion, but chiefly from its analogy to 
 the experienced constitution of nature. 
 
 5. Secondly. Religion is a practical thing, and consists 
 in such a determinate course of life, as being wha't, there ■ 
 is reason to think, is commanded by the 
 
 Answer to sec- . ■' 
 
 ond objection as Author of nature, and will, upon the whole, 
 
 to men's having 
 
 as little reason be OUT happmcss Under his government. 
 
 for worldly pur- ■ 1 , 1 1 
 
 suits as reiig- Now if men Can be convinced that they have 
 the like reason to believe this, as to believe 
 that taking care of their temporal affairs will be to theii 
 advantage ; such conviction cannot but be an argument 
 to them for the practice of religion. And if there be 
 really any reason for believing one of these, and endeav- 
 oring to preserve life, and secure ourselves the necessa- 
 ries and conveniences of it; then there is reason also for 
 believing the other, and endeavoring to secure the inter- 
 est it proposes to us. And if the interest which religion 
 proposes to us be infinitely greater than our whole tem- 
 poral interest, then there must be proportionably great- 
 er reason for endeavoring to secure one than the other: 
 since, by the supposition the probability of our secur- 
 ing one is equal to the probability of our securing the 
 other. This seems plainly unanswerable ; and has * 
 tendency to influence fair minds, who consider whit 
 our condition really is, or upon what evidence we are 
 naturally appointed to act; and who are disposed to 
 acquiesce in the terms upon which we live, and attend 
 to and follow that practical instruction, whatever it be, 
 which is afforded us. 
 
 But the chief and proper force of the argument re- 
 
Chap. VIII.] Objections against Analogy. 337 
 
 ferred to in the objection, lies in another place. For it 
 is said that the proof of religion is involved in such in- 
 extricable difficulties as to render it doubt- „ . , 
 
 Force of the 
 
 ful ; and that it cannot be supposed, that, if objection. God 
 
 111 1 r -1 1 /- , would not pve 
 
 It were true, it would be left upon doubtful <i^ubtfui ey\ 
 evidence. Here then, over and above the 
 force of each particular difficulty or objection, these dif- 
 ficulties and objections taken together, are turned into 
 a positive argument against the truth of religion ; which 
 argument would stand thus: If religion were true, it 
 would not be left doubtful, and open to objections to the 
 degree in which it is : therefore, that it is thus left, not 
 only renders the evidence of it weak, and lessens its 
 force in proportion to the weight of such objections; but 
 also shows it to be false, or is a general presumption of 
 its being so. Now the observation that from the natural 
 constitution and course of things we must, in our tem- 
 poral concerns, almost continually, and in matters of 
 great consequence, act upon evidence of a like kind and 
 degree to the evidence of religion, is an answer to this 
 argument; because it shows, that it is according to the 
 conduct and character of the Author of nature to ap- 
 point we should act upon evidence like to that, which 
 this argument presumes he cannot be supposed to ap- 
 point we should act upon : it is an instance, a general 
 one made up of numerous particular ones, of somewhat 
 in his dealing with us similar to what is said to be in- 
 credible. And as the force of this answer lies merely 
 in the parallel which there is between the evidence 
 for religion and for our temporal conduct, the an- 
 swer is equally just and conclusive ; whether the parallel 
 be made out by showing the evidence of the former to 
 be higher, or the evidence of the latter to be lower. 
 
 6. Thirdly. The design of this treatise is not to vindi- 
 cate the character of God, but to show the obligations 
 
 of men ; it is not to justify his providence, but to show 
 l2 
 
^^S Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 
 
 whal belongs to us to do. These are two subjects, and 
 ought not to l^e confounded. And though they may at 
 Answer to third length run up into each other, yet observa.- 
 rne^moTe of^\nn^ tions may immediately tend to make out the 
 jSiceandSomi- letter, which do rot appear, by any immc- 
 twngslonfound^ ^^^^^ Connection, to the purpose of the 
 *'^' former ; which is less our concern than 
 
 many seem to think. 
 
 For, first, It is not necessary we should justify the dis- 
 pensations of Providence against objections any further 
 than to show that the things objected against may, for 
 aught we know, be consistent with justice and goodness. 
 Suppose, then, that there are things in the system of this 
 world, and plan of Providence relating to it, which, tak- 
 en alone, would be unjust; yet it has been shown unan- 
 swerably, that if we could take in the reference which 
 these things may have to other things present, past, and 
 to come; to the whole scheme, which the things object- 
 ed against are parts of; these very things might, for 
 aught we know, be found to be not only consistent with 
 justice, but instances of it. Indeed, it has been shown, 
 by the analogy of what we see, not only possible that 
 this may be the case, but credible that it is. And thus 
 objections drawn from such things are answered, and 
 Providence is vindicated, as far as religion makes its 
 vindication necessary. 
 
 Hence it appears, secondly. That objections against 
 the divine justice and goodness are not endeavored to 
 be removed by showing that the like objections, allowed 
 to be really conclusive, lie against natural providen'^e; 
 but those objections being supposed, and shown not to 
 De conclusive, the things objected against, considered as 
 matters of fact, are further shown to be credible from 
 their conformity to the constitution of nature; for in- 
 stance, that God will reward and punish men for their 
 actions hereafter, from the observation that he does re- 
 
Chap. VIII.] Objections against Analogy. 339 
 
 ward and punish them for their actions here. And this, 
 I apprehend, is of weight. 
 
 And I add, thirdly, It would be of weight, even though 
 those objections were not answered. For, there being 
 the proof of religion above set down, and religion imply- 
 ing several facts ; for instance again, the fact last men- 
 tioned, that God will reward and punish men for their 
 actions hereafter ; the observation that his present meth- 
 od of government is by rewards and punishments, shows 
 that future fact not to be incredible: whatever objec- 
 tions men may think they have against it, as unjust or 
 unmerciful, according to their notions of justice and 
 mercy; or as improbable from their belief of necessity. 
 I say, as improbable^ for it is evident no objection against 
 it, as unjust^ can be urged from necessity ; since this no- 
 tion as much destroys injustice as it does justice. 
 
 Then, fourthly, Though objections against the reason- 
 ableness of the system of religion cannot, indeed, be 
 answered without entering into consideration of its rea- 
 sonableness, yet objections against the credibility or 
 truth of it may : Because the system of it is reducible 
 into what is properly matter of fact; and the truth, the 
 probable truth, of facts, may be shown without considera- 
 tion of their reasonableness. Nor is it necessary, though 
 m some cases and respects it is highly useful and proper, 
 yet it is not necessary, to give proof of the reasonable- 
 ness of every precept enjoined us, and of every particu- 
 lar dispensation of Providence which comes into the 
 system of religion. Indeed, the more thoroughly a per- 
 son of a right disposition is convinced of the perfection 
 of the Divine nature and conduct, the further he will 
 advance toward that perfection of religion which St. 
 John (i John iv, 18) speaks of. But the general obliga- 
 tions of religion are fully made out, by proving the rea- 
 sonableness of the practice of it. And that the practice 
 of religion is reasonable, maybe shown, though no more 
 
340 Analogy of Religion. lPart II. 
 
 could be proved than that the system of it may be so, 
 for aught we know to the contrary; and even without 
 entering into the distinct consideration of this. And 
 from hence, fifthly, It is easy to see that though the 
 analoL^y of nature is not an immediate answer to objec- 
 tions against the wisdom, the justice, or goodness, of any 
 doctrine or precept of religion, yet it may be, as it is, m 
 immediate and direct answer to what is really intended 
 by such objections ; which is to show, that the things 
 objected against are incredible. 
 
 7. Fourthly. It is most readily acknowledged, that the 
 
 foregoing treatise is by no means satisfactory; very far, 
 
 indeed, from it : but so would any natural 
 
 Answer to . . . ^ . ■' , 
 
 fouith objection institution of life appear, if reduced into a 
 
 that the arfru- • 1 • 
 
 ment is unsatis- systcm, together With Its evidence. Leav- 
 
 factoiy. This is . ... ^ , , . . , , 
 
 true m ordinary ing religion out of the casc, men are divided 
 in their opinions, whether our pleasures 
 overbalance our pains; and whether it be, or be not, 
 eligible to live in this world. And were all such con- 
 troversies settled, which perhaps in speculation would 
 be found involved in great difficulties ; and were it de- 
 termined, upon the evidence of reason, as nature has de- 
 termined it to our hands, that life is to be preserved; 
 yet still, the rules which God has been pleased to afford 
 us for escaping the miseries of it, and obtaining its sat- 
 isfactions, the rules, for instance, of preserving health, 
 and recovering it when lost, are not only fallible and 
 precarious, but very far from being exact. Nor are we 
 informed by nature, in future contingencies and acci- 
 dents, so as to render it at all certain what is the best 
 method of managing our affairs. What will be the si.C' 
 cess of our temporal pursuits, in the common sense of 
 the word success, is highly doubtful. And what will be 
 the success of them in the ])roper sense of the word; 
 that is, what happine'^^ or enjoyment we shall obtain by 
 tiiem, is doul.tfiil in a ,nj€'..i higlicr (,le;j;ree. Indet'd. tlie 
 
Chap. VIIIJ Objections against Analogy 341 
 
 unsatisfactory nature of the evidence with which we 
 are obliged to take up, in the daily course of life, is 
 scarce to be expressed. Yet men do not throw away 
 life, or disregard the interest of it, upon account of this 
 doubtfulness. 
 
 The evidence of religion, then, being admitted real, 
 those who object against it as not satisfactory, that is, as 
 not being what they wish it, plainly forget 
 
 ° \ } ^ ° The objoctlon 
 
 the very condition of our being: for satis- overlooks the na- 
 taction, in this sense, does not belong to ing, also of r©- 
 
 u i. * 1 1 • 1 • ligioQ. 
 
 such a creature as man. And, which is more 
 material, they forget also the very nature of religion. For 
 religion presupposes, in all those who will embrace it, a 
 certain degree of integrity and honesty ; which it was 
 intended to try whether men have or not, and to exer- 
 cise, in such as have it, in order to its improvement. 
 Religion presupposes this as much, and in the same 
 sense, as speaking to a man presupposes he understands 
 the language in which you speak ; or as warning a man 
 of any danger, presupposes that he hath such a regard 
 to himself as that he will endeavor to avoid it. And, 
 therefore, the question is not at all. Whether the evi- 
 dence of religion be satisfactory: but, whether it be, in 
 reason, sufficient to prove and discipline that virtue 
 which it presupposes ? Now the evidence of it is fully 
 sufficient for all those purposes of probation ; how far 
 soever it is from being satisfactory as to the purposes of 
 curiosity, or any other; and, indeed, it answers the pur- 
 poses of the former in several respects, which it would 
 not do, if it were as overbearing as is required. One 
 jnight add further, that whether the motives or the evi- 
 dence for any course of action be satisfactory, meaning 
 here by that word, what satisfies a man that such a 
 course of action will in event be for his good ; this need 
 never be, and I think, strictly speaking, never is, the 
 practical question in common matters. But the practi- 
 
342 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 cal question in all cases is, Whether the evidence for a 
 course of action be such as, taking in all circumstances, 
 makes the faculty within us which is the guide and judge 
 of conduct, (see Dissertation ii,) determine that course 
 of action to be prudent ? Indeed, satisfaction that it 
 will be for our interest or happiness, abundantly deter 
 mines an action to be prudent ; but evidence, almost infi- 
 nitely lower than this, determines actions to be so too, 
 even in the conduct of every day. 
 
 8. Fifthly. As to the objection concerning the influ 
 ence which this argument, or any part of it, may or luay 
 ^, not be expected to have upon men, I ob- 
 
 Answer to fifth ^ .... 
 
 objection that serve, as abovc, that religion being intended 
 
 such evidence . , , ... . . 
 
 will not influ- for a trial and exercise of the morality of 
 
 ence practice. , , , . 
 
 every person s character who is a subject of 
 it ; and there being, as I have shown, such evidence for 
 it as is sufficient, in reason, to influence men to embrace 
 it; to object that it is not to be imagined mankind will 
 be influenced by such evidence, is nothing to the pur- 
 pose of the foregoing treatise. For the purpose of it is 
 not to inquire, what sort of creatures mankind are; but, 
 what the light and knowledge, which is afforded them, 
 requires they should be: to show how, in reason, they 
 ought to behave; not how, in fact, they will behave. 
 This depends upon themselves, and is their own con- 
 cern ; the personal concern of each man in particular 
 And how little regard the generality have to it, experi- 
 ence indeed does too fully show. But religion, consid- 
 ered as a probation, has had its ends upon all persons to 
 whom it has been proposed, with evidence sufficient in 
 reason to influence their practice ; for by this means 
 ihey have been put into a state of probation, let them 
 behave as they will in it. And thus, not only revelation, 
 but reason also, teaches us, that by the evidence of re- 
 ligion being laid before men, the designs of Providence 
 ire carrying on, not only with regard to those who will. 
 
Chap. VI 1 1.] Objections against Analogy. 343 
 
 but likewise with regard to those who will not, be influ- 
 enced by it. However, lastly, the objection here re- 
 ferred to allows the things insisted upon in this treatise 
 to be of some weight; and if so, it may be hoped it will 
 have some influence. And if there be a probability that 
 it will have any at all, there is the same reason in kind, 
 though not in degree, to lay it before men, as there 
 would be if it were likely to have a greater influence. 
 
 9. And further, I desire it may be considered, with 
 respect to the whole of the foregoing objections, that in 
 this treatise I have argued upon the princi- Theauthorhas 
 
 „i r ,1 «. - J I. argued on the 
 
 pies of others,* not my own; and have principles of oth- 
 omitted what I think true, and of the utmost ^^^' 
 importance, because by others thought unintelligible or 
 not true. Thus I have argued upon the principles of 
 the Fatalists, which I do not believe ; and have omitted 
 a thing of the utmost importance, which I do believe — 
 the moral fitness and unfitness of actions, prior to all 
 will whatever : which I apprehend as certainly to deter- 
 mine the Divine conduct, as speculative truth and false- 
 hood necessarily determine the Divine judgment. In- 
 deed, the principle of liberty, and that of moral fitness, 
 so force themselves upon the mind, that moralists, the 
 ancients as well ^ moderns, have formed their language 
 upon it. And probably it may appear in mine, though 
 I have endeavored to avoid it; and, in order to avoid it 
 have sometimes been obliged to express myself in a man- 
 ner which will appear strange to such as do not observe 
 the reason for it; but the general argument here pursued 
 does not at all suppose, or proceed upon, these principles 
 Now, these two abstract principles of liberty and 
 
 * By arguing upon the principles of others, the reader will observe 
 is meant, not proving any thing from those principles, but notwith- 
 standing them. Thus religion is proved, not from the opinion of 
 necessity, which is absurd, but notwithstanding , or even though, thai 
 opinion were admitted to be true. 
 
344 Analogy of Religion. (Part TI. 
 
 mcral fitness being omitted, religion can be considered 
 in no other view than merely as a question of fact ; and 
 in this view it is here considered. It is obvious that 
 Christianity, and the proof of it, are both historical. 
 And even natural religion is properly a matter of fact. 
 For, that there is a righteous Governor of the world, is 
 so; and this proposition contains the general system of 
 natural religion. But then, several abstract truths, and 
 in particular those two principles, are usually taken into 
 consideration in the proof of it ; whereas it is here treat- 
 ed of only as a matter of fact. To explain this : that the 
 three angles of a triangle are equal to two right ones, is 
 an abstract truth ; but that they appear so to our mind 
 is only a matter of fact. And this last must have been 
 admitted, if any thing was, by those ancient skeptics, 
 who would not have admitted the former; but pretend- 
 ed to doubt, whether there were any such thing as truth ; 
 or whether we could certainly depend upon our faculties 
 of understanding for the knowledge of it in any case. 
 
 So, likewise, that there is, in the nature of things, an 
 original standard of right and wrong in actions, independ- 
 ent upon all will, but which unalterably determines the 
 will of God, to exercise that moral government over the 
 world which religion teaches, that is, finally and upon 
 the whole to reward and punish men respectively as they 
 act right or wrong ; this assertion contains an abstrdct 
 truth, as well as matter of fact. But suppose, in the 
 present state, every man, without exception, was reward- 
 ed and punished, in exact proportion as he followed or 
 transgressed that sense of right and wrong which God 
 has implanted in the nature of every man ; this would 
 not be at all an abstract truth, but only a matter of fact. 
 And though this fact were acknowledged by e ;ry one, 
 yet the very same difficulties might be raised as are now 
 concerning the abstract questions of liberty and moral 
 fitness : and we should have a proof, even the certain 
 
Chap. VIII.l Objtxtions against Analogy. 345 
 
 one of experience, that the government of the world was 
 perfectly moral, without taking in the consideration of 
 those questions : and this proof would remain, in what 
 way soever they were determined. 
 
 And thus God, having given mankind a moral faculty, 
 the object of which is actions, and which naturally ap- 
 proves some actions as right and of good desert, and 
 condemns others as wrong and of ill desert ; that he will, 
 finally and upon the whole, reward the former, and pun- 
 ish the latter, is not an assertion of an abstract truth, 
 but of what is as mere a fact as his doing so at present 
 would be. This future fact I have not indeed proved 
 with the force with which it might be proved, from the 
 principles of liberty and moral fitness ; but without them, 
 have given a really conclusive practical proof of it, 
 which is greatly strengthened by the general analogy of 
 nature; a proof easily caviled at, easily shown not to be 
 demonstrative, for it is not offered as such ; but impos-' 
 sible, I think, to be evaded or answered. And thus the 
 obligations of religion are made out, exclusively of the 
 questions concerning liberty and moral fitness; which 
 have been perplexed with difficulties and abstruse rea- 
 sonings as every thing may. 
 
 10. Hence, therefore, may be observed distinctly what 
 is the force of this treatise. It will be, to such as are 
 convini^ed of religion, upon the proof arising Force of this 
 
 - , , • J • • 1 treatise. 
 
 out of the two last-mentioned prmciples, an 
 additional proof and a confirmation of it : to such as do 
 not admit those principles an original proof of it, (pages 
 c6i, etc.,) and a confirmation of that proof. Those who 
 helit.vc will here find the scheme of Christianity cleared 
 of (/ujections, and the evidence of it in a peculiar man- 
 ner strengthened : those who do not believe, will at least 
 be shown the absurdity of all attempts to prove Christian- 
 ity false ; the plain, undoubted credibility of it ; and, 1 
 lope, a good deal more. 
 
346 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 And thus, though some, perhaps, may seriously think 
 that analogy, as here urged, has too great stress laid 
 upon it; and ridicule, unanswerable ridicule, may be 
 applied to show the argument from it in a disadvantage- 
 ous light; yet there can be no question but that it is a 
 real one. For religion, both natural and revealed, im 
 plying in it numerous facts; analogy, being a confirma- 
 tion of all facts to which it can be applied, as it is the 
 only proof of most, cannot but be admitted by every one 
 to be a material thing, and truly of weight on the side 
 of religion, both natural and revealed; and it ought to 
 be particularly regarded bj such as profess to follow 
 nature, and to be less satisfied with abstract reasonings. 
 
Part II.] Conclusion. . 347 
 
 CONCLUSION. 
 
 WHATEVER account may be given of the strange 
 inattention and disregard, in some ages and 
 countries, to a matter of such importance as 
 
 ... . Ill/- • , . "^^^ incredible 
 
 religion, it would, before experience, be m- dLsregard of re- 
 credible that there should be the like disre- 
 gard in those who have had. the moral system of the 
 world laid before them, as it is by Christianity, and often 
 inculcated upon them ; because this moral system car- 
 ries in it a good degree of evidence for its truth, upon 
 its being barely proposed to our thoughts. There is no 
 need of abstruse reasonings and distinctions to convince 
 an unprejudiced understanding that there is a God who 
 made and governs the world, and will judge it in right- 
 eousness; though they may be necessary to answer ab- 
 struse difficulties when once such are raised; when the 
 very meaning of those words which express most intelli- 
 gibly the general doctrine of religion is pretended to be 
 uncertain, and the clear truth of the thing itself is ob- 
 scured by the intricacies of speculation. But to an un- 
 prejudiced mind, ten thousand thousand instances of 
 design cannot but prove a designer. And it is intuitive- 
 ly manifest, that creatures ought to live under a dutiful 
 sense of their Maker; and that justice and charity must 
 be his laws to creatures whom he has made social, and 
 placed in society. 
 
 2. Indeed, the truth of revealed religion, peculiarly so 
 called, is not self-evident, but requires ex- 
 
 . . , . . Immoral tom- 
 
 ternal proof in order to its being received, per of mijid im- 
 Yet mattention, among us, to revealed relig- 
 ion, will be found to imply .the same -dissolute immoral 
 
348 Analogy of Religion. (Part II. 
 
 temper of mind as inattention to natural religion ; be- 
 cause, when both are laid before us, in the manner they 
 are in Christian countries of liberty, our obligations to 
 inquire into both, and to embrace both upon supposition 
 of their trut'i, are obligations of the same nature For 
 revelation claims to be the voice of God ; and our oWi 
 gation to attend to his voice is surely moral in all cases. 
 And as it is insisted that its evidence is conclusive, 
 upon thorough consideration of it ; so it offers itself to 
 us with manifest obvious appearances of having some- 
 thing more than human in it, and, therefore, in all rea- 
 son, requires to have its claims most seriously examined 
 into. 
 
 3. It is to be added, that though light and knowledge, 
 in what manner soever afforded us, is equally from God ; 
 « ,. . ^ .^ yet a miraculous revelation has a peculiar 
 
 RelijHon has the •' . . ^ 
 
 highest claims tendency, from the first principles of our na- 
 
 to attention. ... 
 
 ture, to awaken mankind, and inspire them 
 with reverence and awe : and this is a peculiar obliga- 
 tion, to attend to what claims to be so with such appear- 
 ances of truth. It is, therefore, most certain, that our 
 obligations to inquire seriouslv into the evidence of 
 Christianity, and, upon supposition of its truth, to em- 
 brace it, are of the utmost importance, and moral in the 
 highest and most proper 3ense. Let us, then, suppose, 
 that the evidence of religion in general, and of Chris- 
 tianity, has been seriously inquired into^by all reasona- 
 ble men among us. Yet we find many professedly to 
 reject both, upon speculative principles of infidelity. 
 And all of them do not content themselves with a bare 
 neglect of religion, and enjoying their imaginaiy fiee- 
 dom from its restraints. Some go much beyond this. 
 They deride God's moral government over the world : 
 they renounce his protection, and defy his justice: they 
 ridicule and vilify Christianity, and blaspheme- the Au- 
 thor of it ; ^nd take all occasions to manifest a scorn 
 
Part IIJ Conclusion. 349 
 
 and contempt of revelation. This amounts to an active 
 setting themselves against religion; to what may be 
 considered as a positive principle of irreligion ; which 
 they cultivate within themselves, and, whether they in- 
 tend this effect or not, render habitual, as a good man 
 does the contrary principle. And others, who are 
 not chargeable with all this profligateness, yet are in 
 avowed opposition to religion, as if discovered to be 
 groundless. 
 
 4. Now admitting, which is the supposition we go 
 upon, that these persons act upon what they think prin- 
 ciples of reason, and otherwise they are not p^^.^^^^^ ,,^^„ 
 to be argued with; it is, really, inconceiva- no jiist notion oi 
 
 o 7 7 > / jjg evidence. 
 
 ble that they should imagine they clearly 
 see the whole evidence of it, considered in itself, to be 
 nothing at all ; nor do they pretend this. They are far, 
 indeed, from having a just notion of its evidence ; but 
 they would not say its evidence was nothing if they 
 thought the system of it, with all its circumstances, were 
 credible, like other matters of science or history. So 
 that their manner of treating it must proceed either from 
 such kind of objections against all religion as have been 
 answered or obviated in the former part of this treatise; 
 or else from objections and difficulties supposed more 
 peculiar to Christianity. Thus, they entertain prejudices 
 ao-ainst the whole notion of a revelation and miraculous 
 interpositions. They find things in Scripture, whether 
 in incidental passages or in the general scheme of it, 
 which appear to them unreasonable. They take for 
 graiited, that if Christianity were true, the light of it 
 must fave been more general, and the evidence of it 
 more satisfactory, or rather overbearing ; that it muiit 
 and would have been, in some way, otherwise put and 
 left than it is. Now this is not imagining they see the 
 evidence itself to be nothing, or inconsiderable; but 
 quite another thing. It is being fortified against the 
 
350 Analogy of Religion. [Part II. 
 
 evidence, in some degree acknowledged, by thinking 
 they see the system of Christianity, or somewhat whicli 
 appears to them necessarily connected with it, to be 
 incredible or false : fortified against that evidence, 
 which might otherwise make great imprersion upon 
 them Or lastly, if any of these persons are, upon 
 tlie whole, in doubt concerning the truth of Christian- 
 ity; their behavior seems owing to their taking for 
 granted, through strange inattention, that such doubt- 
 ing is in a manner the same thing as being certain 
 against it. 
 
 5. To these persons, and to this state of opinion con- 
 cerning religion, the foregoing treatise is adapted. Fcr 
 
 This treatise 3-11 the general objections against the moral 
 SbjiS.** Te^ system of nature having been obviated, it is 
 capitulation, shown that there is not any peculiar pre- 
 sumption at all against Christianity, either considered as 
 not discoverable by reason, or as unlike to what is so 
 discovered ; nor any worth mentioning against it as mi- 
 raculous, if any at all ; none, certainly, which can render 
 it in the least incredible. It is shown that upon supposi- 
 tion of a divine revelation, the analogy of nature renders 
 it beforehand highly credible, I think probable, that many 
 things in it must appear liable to great objections, and 
 that we must be incompetent judges of it, to a great de- 
 gree. This observation is, I think, unquestionably true, 
 and of the very utmost importance : but it is urged, as I 
 hope it will be understood, with great caution of not 
 vilifying the faculty of reason, which is "the candle of 
 the Lord within us;" though it can afford no light where 
 it does not shine; nor judge, where it has no principles 
 to judge upon. The objections here spoken of being 
 first answered in the view of objections against Chris- 
 tianity as a matter of fact, are in the next place consid- 
 ered as urged more immediately against the wisdo'.n 
 justice, and goodness of the (Christian disj)ensjtion 
 
Part IIJ Conclusiox. 351 
 
 And it is fully made out, that they admit of exactly the 
 like answer, in every respect, to what the like objections 
 against the constitution of nature admit of: that, as par- 
 tial views give the appearance of wrong to things, which, 
 upon further consideration and knowledge of their rela- 
 tions to other things, are found just and good; so it is 
 perfectly credible that the things objected against the 
 wisdom and goodness of the Christian dispensation may 
 be rendered instances of wisdom and goodness by their 
 reference to other things beyond our view; because 
 Christianity is a scheme as much above our compre- 
 hension as that of nature; and like that, a scheme in 
 w^hich means are made use of to accomplish ends, and 
 which, as is most credible, may be carried on by gen- 
 eral laws. And it ought to be attended to, that thib 
 is not an answer taken merely or chiefly from our 
 ignorance ; but from somewhat positive, which our 
 observation shows us. For to like objections the 
 like answer is experienced to be just, in numberless 
 parallel cases. 
 
 The objections against the Christian dispensation, and 
 the method by which it is carried on, having been thus 
 obviated, in general and together ; the chief of them are 
 considered distinctly, and the particular things objected 
 to are shown credible, by their perfect analogy, each 
 apart, to the constitution of nature. Thus, if man be 
 fallen from his primitive state, and to be restored, and 
 infinite wisdom and power engages in accomplishing our 
 recovery; it were to have been expected, it is said, that 
 this should have been effected at once, and not by such 
 a long series of means, and such a various economy of 
 persons and things ; one dispensation preparatory to an- 
 other, this to a further one, and so on through an in- 
 definite number of ages, before the end of the scheme 
 proposed can be completely accomplished ; a scheme 
 conducted by infinite wisdom, and executed by ahnighty 
 
352 Analogy of Religion. LPart II. 
 
 power. But now, on the contrary, our finding that every 
 thing in the constitution and course of nature is thus 
 carried on, shows such expectations concerning revela- 
 tion to be highly unreasonable, and is a satisfactory an- 
 swer to them, when urged as objections against the 
 credibility that the great scheme of Providence in the 
 redemption of the world may be of this kind, and to be 
 accomplished in this manner. 
 
 As to the particular method of our redemption, the 
 appointment of a Mediator between God and man ; this 
 has been shown to be most obviously analogous to the 
 general conduct of nature, that is, the God of nature, in 
 appointing others to be the instruments of his mercy, as 
 we experience in the daily course of Providence. The 
 condition of this world, which the doctrine of our re- 
 demption by Christ presupposes, so much falls in with 
 natural appearances, that heathen moralists inferred it 
 from those appearances; inferred, that human nature 
 was fallen from its original rectitude, and in conse- 
 quence of this degraded from its primitive happiness. 
 Or, however this opinion came into the world, these ap- 
 pearances must have kept up the tradition and con- 
 firmed the belief of it. And as it was the general opin- 
 ion, under the light of nature, that repentance and 
 leformation alone, and by itself, was not sufficient to do 
 away sin, and procure a full remission of the penalties 
 annexed to it ; and as the reason of the thing does not 
 at all lead to any such conclusion ; so every day's ex- 
 perience shows us that reformation is not, in any sort 
 sufficient to prevent the present disadvantages and rnis« 
 eries which, in the natural course of things, God has 
 annexed to folly and extravagance. 
 
 Yet there may be ground to think that the punish- 
 ments which, by the general laws of divine government, 
 are annexed to vice, may be prevented; that provision 
 may have been even originally made that they should 
 
rAPf riJ ■ - Conclusion. V. 353 
 
 be prevented, by some means or other, though they 
 could not by reformation alone. For we have daily in- 
 stances of such mercy, in the general conduct of nature ; 
 compassion provided for misery,* medicines for diseaLCS. 
 friends against enemies. There is provision made, in 
 the original constitution of the world, that much of the 
 natural bad consequences of our follies, which persons 
 themselves alone cannot prevent, may be prevented by 
 the assistance of others ; assistance which nature enables, 
 and disposes, and appoints them to afford. By a method 
 of goodness analogous to this, when the world lay in 
 wickedness, and consequently, in ruin, " God so loved 
 the world, that he gave his only begotten Son," to save 
 it; and, "he being made perfect by suffering, became 
 the author of eternal salvation to all them that obey 
 him." John iii, 16; Heb. v, 9. Indeed, neither reason 
 nor analogy would lead us to think in particular, that 
 the interposition of Christ, in the manner in which he 
 did interpose, would be of that efficacy for recovery of 
 the world which the Scripture teaches us it was : but 
 neither would reason nor analogy lead us to think, that 
 other particular means would be of the efficacy which 
 experience shows they are, in numberless instances. 
 And therefore, as the case before us does not admit of 
 experience ; so that neither reason nor analogy can 
 show how, or in what particular way, the interposition 
 of Christ, as revealed in Scripture, is of that efficacy 
 which it is there represented to be; this is no kind or 
 degree of presumption against its being really of that 
 efficacy. 
 
 Further: the objections against Christianity, from the 
 light of it not being universal, nor its evidence so strong 
 as might possil">ly be given us, have been answered by 
 the general analogy of nature. That God has made 
 such variety of creatures, is indeed an answer to the 
 • Scrnioji vi, at the Rolls. 
 
354 Analogy of Religion. [Part II 
 
 former; but that he dispenses his gifts in such variety, 
 both of degrees and kinds, among creatures of the same 
 species, and even to the same individuals at different 
 times, is a more obvious and full answer to it. And it 
 is so far from being the method of Providence, in otnci 
 cases, to afford us such overbearing evidence, as some 
 requi'-') in proof of Christianity, that, on the contrary, 
 the r- /jdence upon which we are naturally appointed to 
 act, in common matters, throughout a very great part of 
 life, is doubtful in a high degree. And admitting the 
 fact, that God has afforded to some no more than doubt- 
 ful evidence of religion, the same account may be given 
 of it as of difficulties and temptations with regard to 
 practice. But as it is not impossible, (page 284,) surely, 
 that this alleged doubtfulness may be men's own fault, 
 it deserves their most serious consideration, whether it 
 be not so. However, it is certain that doubting implies 
 a degree of evidence for that of which we doubt ; and 
 that this degree of evidence as really lays us under ob- 
 ligations as demonstrative evidence. 
 
 6. The whole, then, of religion is throughout credible; 
 nor is there, I think, any thing relating to the revealed 
 dispensation of things more different from the experi- 
 enced constitution and course of nature, than some 
 parts of the constitution of nature are from other parts 
 of it. And if so, the only question which remains is, 
 What positive evidence can be alleged for the truth of 
 Christianity.' This too, in general, has been considered 
 and the objections against it estimated. Deduct, there- 
 fore, what is to be deducted from that evidence upon 
 account of any weight which may be thought to remain 
 in these objections after what the analogy of nature has 
 suggested in answer to them ; and then consider, what 
 are the practical consequences from all this, upon the 
 most skeptical principles one can argue upon, (for I am 
 writing to per?.ons who entertain these principles;) and 
 
Part II.] Conclusion. 355 
 
 upon such consideration it will be obvious that immor- 
 ality, as little excuse as it admits of in itself, is greatly 
 aggravated in persons who have been made The ag^n-avated 
 acquainted with Christianity, whether they ^' 
 
 believe it or not ; because the moral system of nature, 
 or natural religion, which Christianity lays before us, 
 approves itself, almost intuitively, to a reasonable mind 
 upon seeing it proposed. 
 
 In the next place, with regard to Christianity, it will 
 De observed that there is a middle between a full satis- 
 faction of the truth of it and a satisfaction The middle 
 of the contrary. The middle state of mind ^t*^ of mind, 
 between these two consists in a serious apprehension 
 that it may be true, joined with doubt whether it be so. 
 And this, upon the best judgment I am able to make, is 
 as far toward speculative infidelity as any skeptic can at 
 all be supposed to go who has had true Christianity, 
 with the proper evidence of it, laid before him, and has 
 in any tolerable measure considered them. For I would 
 not be mistaken to comprehend all who have ever heard 
 of it; because it seems evident, that in many countries 
 called Christian, neither Christianity nor its evidence 
 are fairly laid before men. And in places where both 
 are, there appear to be some who have very little at- 
 tended to either, and who reject Christianity with a scorn 
 proportionate to their inattention, and yet are by no 
 means without understanding in other matters. Now it 
 lias been shown, that a serious apprehension that Chris- 
 tianity may be true, lays persons under the strictest obli- 
 gations of a serious regard to it throughout the whole of 
 their life ; a regard, not the same exactly, but in many 
 respects nearly the same, with what a full conviction of 
 its truth would lay them under. 
 
 Lastly^ it will appear, that blasphemy and 
 
 r T • 1 1 /-.I • Blasphemy, 
 
 profaneness, T mean with regard to Chris- etc.. without es 
 •i.mitv, ire absolnteh: without excuse. For 
 
356 Analogy of Religion. [Part II, 
 
 there is no temptation to it, but from the wantonness 
 of vanity or mirth ; and these, considering the infinite 
 importance of' the subject, are no such temptations as 
 to afford any excuse for it. If this be a just account 
 of things, and yet men can go on to vilify or disregard 
 Christianity, which is to talk and act as if they had a 
 demonstration of its falsehood, there is no reason to 
 think they would alter their behavior to any purpose, 
 though there were a demonstration of its truth. 
 
DISSEETATIOKS 
 
 ON 
 
 PEllSOXAL IDENTITY AND THE NATURE OF VIRTUE/ 
 
 Dissertation I. — Of Personal Identity. 
 
 WHETHER we are to live in a future state, as it 
 is the most important question which can possi- 
 bly be asked, so it is the most intelligible one which can 
 be expressed in language. Yet strange perplexities have 
 been raised about the meaning of that identity, or same- 
 ness of person, which is implied in the notion of our liv- 
 ing now and hereafter, or in any two successive moments. 
 And the solution of these difficulties hath been stranger 
 than the difficulties themselves. For, personal identity 
 has been explained so by some, as to render the inquiry 
 concerning a future life of no consequence at all to us, 
 the persons who are making it. And though few men 
 can be misled by such subtleties, yet it may be proper 
 a little to consider them. 
 
 Now, when it is asked wherein personal identity con- 
 sists, the answer should be the same as if it were asked, 
 wherein consists similitude or equality ; that all attempts 
 to define, would but perplex it. Yet there is no diffi- 
 culty at all in ascertaining the idea. For as, upon two 
 
 + Ir the first copy of these Papers I had inserted the two follcw- 
 \Ag Dissertations into the chapters, 0/ a Ftititre Life, and Of !he 
 Moral Govcj'nment of God ; with which they are closely connected. 
 But as they do not directly fall under the title of the foregoirii7 
 Treatise, and would have kept the subject of it too long out of sighi. 
 it seemed more proper to place them by themselves. 
 
358 Analogy of Religion. [Diss. I ' 
 
 trianglef] being compared or viewed together, there 
 arises to the mind the idea of similitude; or upon twice 
 t.Avo and four, the idea of equality; so likewise, upon 
 comparing the consciousness of one's self, or one's own 
 existence in any two moments, there as immediately 
 arises to the mind the idea of personal id'.*ntity. And 
 •^s the two former comparisons not only give us the ideas 
 of similitude and equality, but also show us that two 
 triangles are alike, and twice two and four are equal ; so 
 the latter comparison not only gives us the idea of per- 
 sonal identity, but also shows us the identity of our- 
 selves in those two moments; the present, suppose, and 
 that immediately past ; or the present, and that a month, 
 a year, or twenty years past. Or, in other words, by re- 
 flecting upon that which is myself now, and that which 
 was myself twenty years ago, I discern they are not two, 
 but one and the same self. 
 
 But though consciousness of what is past does thus 
 ascertain our personal identity to ourselves, yet to say 
 that it makes personal identity, or is necessary to our 
 being the same persons, is to say that a .person has not 
 existed a single moment, nor done one action, but what 
 he can remember ; indeed, none but what he reflects 
 upon. And one should really think it self-evident, that 
 consciousness of personal identity presupposes, and 
 therefore cannot constitute, personal identity, any more 
 than knowledge, in any other case, can constitute truth 
 which it presupposes. 
 
 This wonderful mistake may possibly have arisen rem 
 hence, that to be endued with consciousness, is insepara. 
 ble from the idea of a person, or intelligent being. Foj 
 this might be expressed inaccurately thus — that con- 
 sciousness makes personality; and from hence it might 
 be concluded to make personal identity. But though 
 present consciousness of what we at present do and feel 
 is necessary to our being the persons we now are; yei 
 
Diss. I.] Personal Identity. 359 
 
 piesent consciousness of past actions or feelings is not 
 necessary to our being the same persons who performed 
 those actions or had those feelings. 
 
 The inquiry, what makes vegetables the same, in the 
 common acceptation of the word, does not appear to 
 have any relation to this of personal identity ; because 
 the word same^ when applied to them and to person, is 
 not only applied to different subjects, but it is also used 
 in different senses. For when a- man swears to the same 
 tree, as having stood fifty years in the same place, he 
 means only the same as to all the purposes of property 
 and uses of common life, and not that the tree has been 
 all that time the same in the strict philosophical sense of 
 the word. For he does not know whether any one par- 
 ticle of the present tree be the same with any one parti- 
 cle of the tree which stood in the same place fifty years 
 ago. And if they have not one common particle of 
 matter, they cannot be the same tree, in the proper phil- 
 osophic sense of the word same ; it being evidently a 
 contradiction in terms to say they are, when no part of 
 their substance, and no one of their properties, is the 
 same: no part of their substance by the supposition; 
 no one of their properties, because it is allowed that the 
 same property cannot be transferred from one substance 
 tD another. And, therefore, when we say the identity, 
 or sameness, of a plant consists in a continuation of the 
 same life, communicated under the same organization, 
 to a number of particles of matter, whether the same or 
 not, the word same^ when applied to life and to organiza- 
 :ion, cannot possibly be understood to signify what it 
 signifies in this very sentence, when applied to matter. 
 In a loose and popular sense, then, the life, and the or- 
 ganization, and the plant, are justly said to be the same, 
 notwithstanding the perpetual change of the parts. 
 But in a strict and philosophical manner of speech, no 
 man, no being, no mode of being, no any thing, can be 
 
360 Analogy of Religion. [Diss. I. 
 
 the same with that with which it hath, indeed, nothing 
 the same. Now, sameness is used in this latter sense 
 when applied to persons. The identity of these, there- 
 fore, cannot subsist with diversity of substance. 
 
 The thing here considered, and demonstratively, as I 
 think, determined, is proposed by Mr. Locke in these 
 words, Whether it, that is, the same self or person, be the 
 same identical substa7ice7 And he has suggested what is 
 a much better answer to the question than that which 
 he gives it in form. For he defines person, a thinl'ing, 
 intelligent being, etc., and personal identity, the sameness 
 of a rational bei7tg* The question then is, whether the 
 same rational being is the same substance ; which needs 
 no answer, because being and substance, in this place, 
 stand for the same idea. The ground of the doubt, 
 whether the same person be the same substance, is said 
 to be this: that the consciousness of our own existence, 
 in youth and in old age, or in any two joint successive 
 moments, is not the same ifidividual action,\ that is, not 
 the same consciousness, but different successive con- 
 sciousnesses. Now, it is strange that this should have 
 occasioned such perplexities. For it is surely conceiv- 
 able that a person may have a capacity of knowing some 
 object or other to be the same now which it was when 
 he contemplated it formerly ; yet in this case, where, by 
 the supposition, the object is perceived to be the same, 
 the perception of it in any two moments cannot be one 
 and the same perception. And thus, though the suc- 
 cessive consciousnesses which we have of our own ex'^t* 
 ence are not the same, yet are they consciousnesses of 
 one and the same thing or object ; of the same perr.on, 
 self, or living agent. The person of whose existence the 
 consciousness is felt now, and was felt an hour or a } ear 
 ago, is discerned to be, not two persons, but one and the 
 same person ; and therefore is one and the same. 
 
 • Locke's Works, vol. i, page 146. -f Locke, pages 146, 147. 
 
Diss. I.] Personal Identity. 361 
 
 Mr. Locke's observations upon this subject appear 
 hasty: and he seems to profess himself dissatisfied with 
 suppositions which he has made relating to it * But 
 some of those hasty observations have been carried to a 
 sttange length by others, whose notion, when traced and 
 examined to the bottom, amounts, I think, to this : t 
 'That personality is not a permanent, but a transient 
 thii^g; that it lives and dies, begins and ends, continu- 
 ally : that no one can any more remain one and the 
 same person two moments together, than two successive 
 moments can be one and the same moment : that our 
 substance is, indeed, continually changing; but whether 
 this be so or not, is, it seems, nothing to the purpose; 
 since it is not substance, but consciousness alone, which 
 constitutes personality; which consciousness being suc- 
 cessive, cannot be the same in any two moments, nor 
 consequently the personality constituted by it." And 
 from hence it must follow, that it is a fallacy upon our- 
 selves to charge our present selves with any thing 
 we did, or to imagine our present selves interested in 
 any thing which befell us yesterday, or that our present 
 self will be interested in what will befall us to-morrow : 
 since our present self is not, in reality, the same with 
 the self of yesterday, but another like self or person 
 coming in its room, and mistaken for it; to which an- 
 other self will succeed to-morrow. This, I say, must 
 follow : for if the self or person of to-day, and that of 
 to-morrow, are not the same, but only like persons, the 
 person of to-day is really no more interested in what will 
 befall the person of to-morrow than in what will befall 
 my other person. 
 
 U may be thought, perhaps, that this is not a just rep- 
 rcseLtalion of the opinion we are speaking of; because 
 
 * Locke, page 152. 
 
 f See an answer to Dr. Clarke's third defense of his letter to Mr. 
 Dodvvell, 2d edition, pages 44. 56. etc. 
 
362 Analogy of Religion. [Diss. I. 
 
 tnose who maintain it allow, that a person r.i the same 
 as far back as his remembrance reaches. And, indeed, 
 they do use the words identity and same person. Nor 
 will language permit these words to be laid aside: since, 
 if Ihey were, there must be, I know not what ridiculous 
 periphrasis substituted in the room of them. But they 
 cannot, consistently with themselves, mean that the per- 
 son is i"eally the same. For it is self-evident that the 
 personality cannot be really the same, if, as they ex- 
 pressly assert, that in which it consists is not the same. 
 And as, consistently with themselves, they cannot, so, I 
 think, it appears they do not, mean that the person is 
 really the same, but only that he is so in a fictitious 
 sense: in such a sense only as they assert; for this they 
 do assert, that any number of persons whatever may be 
 the same person. The bare unfolding this notion, and 
 laying it thus naked and open, seems the best confuta- 
 tion of it. However, since great stress is said to be put 
 upon it, I add the following things : — 
 
 First. This notion is absolutely contradictory to that 
 certain conviction which necessarily, and every moment, 
 rises within us, when we turn our thoughts upon our- 
 selves : when we reflect upon what is past, and look for- 
 ward upon what is to come. All imagination of a daily 
 change of that living agent which each man calls him- 
 self for another, or of any such change throughout our 
 whole present life, is entirely borne down by our natural 
 sense of things. Nor is it possible for a person in his 
 wits to alter his conduct, with regard to his hi ilth or 
 affairs, from a suspicion that though he should iive to- 
 morrow he should not, however, be the same person he 
 is to-day. And yet, if it be reasonable to act with re- 
 spect to a future life upon this notion, that personality 
 is transient, it is reasonable to act upon it with res])cct 
 to the present. Here, then, is a notion equally applica- 
 ble to religion and to our temporal concerns ; and every 
 
Diss. IJ Personal Identity. 363 
 
 one sees and feels the inexpressible absurdity cf it in 
 the latter case. If, therefore, any can take up with it in 
 the former, this cannot proceed from the reason of the 
 thing, but must be owing to an inward unfairness, and 
 secret corruption of heart. 
 
 Secofidly. It is not an idea, or abstract notion, or qual- 
 ity, but a being only, which is capable of life and action, 
 of happiness and misery. Now all beings confessedly 
 continue the same during the whole time of their exist- 
 ence. Consider, then, a living being now existing, and 
 which has existed for any time alive : this living being 
 must have done, and suffered, and enjoyed, what it has 
 done, and suffered, and enjoyed formerly, (this living 
 being, I say, and not another,) as really as it does, and 
 suffers, and enjoys what it does, and suffers, and en- 
 joys this instant. All these successive actions, enjoy- 
 ments, and sufferings, are actions, enjoyments, and 
 sufferings, of the same living being. And they are so, 
 prior to all consideration of its remembering or for- 
 getting; since remembering or forgetting can make no 
 alteration in the truth of past matter of fact. And sup- 
 pose this being endued with limited powers of knowl- 
 edge and memory, there is no more difficulty in con- 
 ceiving it to have a power of knowing itself to be the 
 same living being which it was some time ago, of re- 
 membering some of its actions, sufferings, and enjoy- 
 ments, and forgetting others, than in conceiving it to 
 know, or remember, or forget, any thing else. 
 
 Thirdly. Every person is conscious that he is now the 
 same person or self he was as far back as his remem- 
 brarce reaches; since, when any one reflects upon a 
 par.t action of his own, he is just as certain of the per- 
 son who did that action, namely, himself, the person who 
 now reflects upon it, as he is certain that the action was 
 at all done. Nay, very often a person's assurance of 
 an action having been done, of which he is absolutely 
 
I 
 
 l6^ Analogy of Religion. LDiss. I. 
 
 assured, arises wholly from the con'sciousness that he 
 himself did it. And this he, person or self, must either 
 be a substance or the property of some substance. If 
 he, if person, be a substance; then consciousness that he 
 is the same person is consciousness that he is the same 
 substance. If the person, or he, be the property of aiub- 
 stance, still consciousness that he is the same property, 
 is as certain a proof that his substance remains the same, 
 as consciousness that he remains the same substance 
 would be ; since the same property cannot be trans- 
 ferred from one substance to another. 
 
 But, though we are thus certain that we are the same 
 agents, living beings, or substances, now, which we were 
 as far back as our remembrance reaches ; yet it is asked, 
 whether we may not possibly be deceived in it? And 
 this question may be asked at the end of any demon- 
 stration whatever; because it is a question concerning 
 the truth of perception by memory. And he who can 
 doubt whether perception by memory can in this case 
 be depended upon, may doubt also whether perception 
 by deduction and reasoning, which also include memory, 
 or, indeed, whether intuitive perception, can. Here, 
 then, we can go no further. For it is ridiculous to at- 
 tempt to prove the truth of those perceptions, whose 
 truth we can no otherwise prove than by other percep- 
 tions of exactly the same kind with them, and which 
 there is just the same ground to suspect; or to attempt 
 to prove the truth of our faculties, which can no other- 
 wise be proved than by the use or means of those very 
 suspected faculties themselves. 
 
Diss. II.] The Nature of Virtuk. 365 
 
 Dissertation II. — Of the Nature of VrRTijE. 
 
 That which renders beings capable of moral govern- 
 r.ient is their having a moral nature, and moral faculties 
 of perception and of action. Brute creatures arc im- 
 pressed and actuated by various instincts and propen- 
 sions ; so also are we. But additional to this, we have 
 a capacity of reflecting upon actions and characters, and 
 making them an object to our thought : and on doing 
 this, we naturally and unavoidably approve some actions, 
 under the peculiar view of their being virtuous, and of 
 good-desert, and disapprove others, as vicious and of 
 ill-desert. That we have this moral approving and dis- 
 approving* faculty is certain ftom our experiencing it 
 in ourselves, and recognizing it in each other. It ap- 
 pears from our exercising it unavoidably, in the appro- 
 bation and disapprobation even of feigned characters; 
 from the words right and wrongs odious and aifiiable^ base 
 and worthy^ with many others of like signification in all 
 languages, applied to actions and characters; from the 
 many written systems of morals which suppose it ; since 
 it cannot be imagined^ that all these authors, throughout 
 all these treatises, had absolutely no meaning at all to 
 their words, or a meaning merely chimerical : from our 
 
 * This way of speaking is taken from Epictetus,* and is made use 
 of as seeming the most full, and the least liable to cavil. And the 
 moral faculty may be understood to have these two epithets, 6oh. lyLaa- 
 TiKTj and uTTodoKifjiaaTtKTj, upon a double account ; because, upon a 
 survey of actions, whether before or after they are done, it determines 
 them to be good or evil ; and also because it determines itself to be 
 the guide of action and of life, in contradistinction from all other fac 
 ulties or natural principles of action : in the very same manner, ab 
 speculative reason directly and naturally judges of speculative truth 
 and falsehood ; and, at the same time, is attended with a conscious- 
 ness, upon rejlection, that the natural right to judge of them belongs 
 fo it, 
 
 • Ajt., Epkt., lib. I cap. 1- 
 
366 Analogy oiC Religion. [Diss. II. 
 
 natural sense of gratitude, which implies a distinction 
 between merely being the instrument of good and in- 
 tending it; from tte like distinction, every one makes 
 between injury and mere harm, which, Hobbes says, is 
 peculiar to mankind; and between injury and just pun- 
 ishment, a distinction plainly natural, prior to the con- 
 sideration of human laws. 
 
 It is manifest, great part of common language, and of 
 common behavior over the world, is formed upon sup- 
 position of such a moral faculty ; whether called con- 
 science, moral reason, moral sense, or divine reason ; 
 whether considered as a sentiment of the understanding 
 or as a perception of the heart, or, which seems the 
 truth, as including both.* Nor is it at all doubtful in 
 the general, what course of action this faculty, or prac- 
 tical discerning power within us, approves, and what it 
 disapproves. For, as much as it has been disputed 
 wherein virtue consists, or whatever ground for doubt 
 there may be about particulars, yet, in general, there 
 is in reality a universally acknowledged standard of 
 it. It is that which all ages and all countries have 
 made profession of in public ; it is that which every 
 man you meet puts on the show of; it is that which the 
 primary and fundamental laws of all civil constitutions, 
 over the face of the earth, make it their business and 
 endeavor to enforce the practice of upon mankind; 
 namely, justice, veracity, and regard to common good. 
 It being manifest, then, in general, that we have such a 
 
 * [Butler's meaning appears to be, that, if it be referred to the un 
 flerstanding, it differs from other acts of the understanding in partak 
 ing of the nature of feeling ; and that, if it be referred to the heart 
 or feelings, it must be allowed to partake of the nature of perception. 
 Coj;npare the language of Adam Smith, in describing the system of 
 Hulcheson. " This sentijtient being of a peculiar nature, distinct 
 from every other, and the effect of a particular power of perception, 
 they give it a particular name, and call it a moral sense." — Part vi, 
 chap. iii. page 356.— F.] 
 
Diss. IIJ The Nature of Virtue. 367 
 
 faculty or discernment as this, it may be of use to re- 
 mark some things, more distinctly concerning it. 
 
 First. It ought to be observed, that the object of this 
 faculty is actions,* comprehending under that name act- 
 ive or practical principles ; those principles from which 
 men would act, if occasions and circumstances gave 
 them power; and which, when fixed and habitual in any 
 person, we call his character. It does not appear that 
 brutes have the least reflex sense of actions, as distin- 
 guished from events; or that will and design, which 
 constitute the very nature of actions as such, are at all 
 an object to their perception. But to ours they are ; 
 and they are the object, and the only one, of the approv- 
 ing and disapproving faculty. Acting, conduct, behav- 
 ior, abstracted from all regard to what is, in fact and 
 event, the consequence of it, is itself the natural object 
 of the moral discernment, as speculative truth and false- 
 hood is of speculative reason. Intention of such and 
 such consequences, indeed, is always included ; for it 
 is part of the action itself: but though the intended 
 good or bad consequences do not follow, we have ex- 
 actly the same sense of the action as if they did. In 
 like manner, we think well or ill of characters, abstracted 
 from all consideration of the good or the evil which per- 
 sons of such characters have it actually in their power 
 to do. We never, in the moral way, applaud or blame 
 either ourselves or others for what we enjoy or what we 
 suffer, or, for having impressions made upon us which 
 we consider as altogether out of our power ; but only for 
 what we do or would have done had it been in our 
 power ; or for what we leave undone which we might 
 have done, or would have left undone though we could 
 have done it. 
 
 Secondly. Our sense or discernment of actions, as 
 
 * ovSk rj aperrj kc\ KOKia — ev ireiaei, a/iXa hepyeia. M. Anton., lib. 
 u. i^ — Virtutis lans omnisin actione con?i!itit. Cic OfiFic. lib. i.c 6 
 
/ 
 
 368 Analogy of Rei igion. * [Diss. IT. 
 
 morali}' good or evil, implies in it a sense or discern- 
 ment of them as of good or ill desert. It may be diffi- 
 cult to explain this perception, so as to answer all the 
 questions which may be asked- concerning it ; but everv 
 one speaks of such actions as deserving punishment; 
 and it is not, I suppose, pretended that they have ab- 
 solutely no meaning at all to the expression. Now the 
 meaning plainly is not, that we conceive it for the good 
 of society, that the doer of such actions should be made 
 to suffer. For if, unhappily, it were resolved that a man 
 who, by some innocent action, was infected with the 
 plague, should be left to perish, lest, by other people's 
 coming near him the infection should spread ; no one 
 would say, he deserved this treatment. Innocence and 
 ill desert are inconsistent ideas. Ill desert always sup- 
 poses guilt ; and if one be not part of the other, yet they 
 are evidently and naturally connected in our mind. 
 The sight of a man in misery raises our compassion 
 toward him ; and, if this misery be inflicted on him by 
 another, our indignation against the author of it. But 
 when we are informed that the sufferer is a villain, and 
 is punished only for his treachery or cruelty, our com- 
 passion exceedingly lessens, and, in many instances, our 
 indignition wholly subsides. Now, what produces this 
 effect, is the conception of that in the sufferer which we 
 call ill desert. Upon considering, then, or viewing to- 
 gether, our notion of vice and that of misery, there n^- 
 sults a third, that of ill desert. And thus there is in 
 human creatures an association of the two ideas, natural 
 and moral evil, wickedness and punishment. If thi? 
 association were merely artificial or accidental, it were 
 nothing ; but being most unquestionably natural, it great- 
 ly concerns us to attend to it, instead of endeavoring to 
 explain it away. 
 
 It may be observed, further, concerning our percep- 
 tion of good and of ill desert, that the formei is very 
 
Diss. IIJ The Nature of Virtue. 369 
 
 weak with respect to common instances of virtue. One 
 reason of which may be, that it does not appear to a 
 spectator how far such instances of virtue proceed from 
 a virtuous principle, or in what degree this principle is 
 prevalent ; since a very weak regard to virtue may bt 
 sufficient to make men act well in many common in- 
 stances. And on the other hand, our perception of ill 
 desert in vicious actions lessens, in proportion to the 
 temptations men are thought to have had to such vices. 
 For vice, in human creatures, consisting chiefly in the 
 absence or want of the virtuous principle, though a man 
 be overcome, suppose, by tortures, it does not from 
 thence appear to what degree the virtuous principle was 
 wanting. All that appears is, that he had it not in such 
 a degree as to prevail over the temptation ; but possibly 
 he had it in a degree which would have rendered him 
 proof against common temptations. 
 
 Thirdly. Our perception of vice and ill desert arises 
 from, and is the result of, a comparison of actions with 
 the nature and capacities of the agent. For the mere 
 neglect of doing what we ought to do would, in many 
 cases, be determined by all men to be in the highest de- 
 gree vicious. And this determination must arise from 
 such comparison, and be the result of it ; because such 
 neglect would not be vicious in creatures of other na- 
 tures and capacities, as brutes. And it is the same 
 also with respect to positive vices, or such as con- 
 sist in doing what we ought not. For, every one has a 
 different sense of harm done by an idiot, madman, or 
 child, and by one of mature and common understand- 
 ing; though the action of both, including the intention, 
 which is part of the action, be the same : as it may be, 
 since idiots and madmen, as well as children, are capa- 
 ble not only of doing mischief, but also of intending it. 
 Now, this difference must arise from somewhat discerned 
 in the nature or capacities of one, which renders the 
 24 
 
/ 
 
 370 Analogy of Religion. [Diss. II. 
 
 action vicious; and the want of tvhich in the other, ren- 
 ders the same action innocent or less vicious; and thic 
 plainly supposes a comparison,* whether reflected upon 
 or not, between the action and capacities of the agent, 
 previous to our determining an action to be vicious 
 And hence arises a proper application of the epithets, 
 incong7'itous^ unsuitable^ disproportio7iate^ tmfii^ to actions 
 which our moral faculty determines to be vicious. 
 
 Fourthly. It deserves to be considered, whether men 
 are more at liberty, in point of morals, to make them 
 selves miserable without reason, than to make other 
 people so ; or dissolutely to neglect their own greater 
 good for the sake of a present lesser gratification, than 
 they are to neglect the good of others, whom nature has^ 
 committed to their care. It should seem, that a due 
 concern about our own interest or happiness, and a rea- 
 sonable endeavor to secure and promote it, which is, I 
 think, very much the meaning of the word prudence in 
 our language; it should seem, that this is virtue, and 
 the contrary behavior faulty and blamable : since in 
 the calmest way of reflection, we approve of the first and 
 condemn the other conduct, both in ourselves and oth- 
 ers. This approbation and disapprobation are altogether 
 different from mere desire of our own, or of their happi- 
 ness, and from sorrow upon missing it. For the object 
 or occasion of this last kind of perception, is satisfaction 
 or uneasiness ; whereas the object of the first is active 
 behavior. In one case, what our thoughts fix upon, is 
 our condition ; in the other, our conduct. 
 
 It is true, indeed, that nature has not given us so 
 sensible a disapprobation of imprudence and folly eitliei 
 in ourselves or others^ as of falsehood, injustice, and cruel- 
 ty ; I suppose, because that constant habitual sense of 
 private interest and good, \i'hich we always carry abo-jt 
 with us, renders such sensible disapprobation less neces- 
 sary, less wanting, to keep us from imprudently neglect 
 
Diss. II.l The Nature of Virtue. 371 
 
 ing our own happiness, and foolishly injuring ourselves, 
 than it is necessary and wanting to keep us from injur- 
 ing others, to whose good we cannot have so strong and 
 constant a regard; and also, because imprudence and 
 foMy, appearing to bring its own punishment more imme- 
 diately and constantly than injurious behavior, it less 
 needs the additional punishment, which would be inflict- 
 ed upon it by others had they the same sensible indig- 
 nation against it as against injustice, and fraud, and 
 cruelty. Besides, unhappiness being in itself the natu- 
 ral object of compassion,' the unhappiness which people 
 bring upon themselves, though it be willfully, excites in 
 us some pity for them ; and this, of course, lessens our 
 displeasure against them. But still it is matter of expe- 
 rience, that we are formed so, as to reflect very severely 
 upon the greater instances of imprudent neglects and 
 foolish rashness, both in ourselves and others. In in- 
 stances of this kind, men often say of themselves with 
 remorse, and of others with some indignation, that they 
 deserved to suff'er such calamities, because they brought 
 them upon themselves, and would not take warning. 
 Particularly, when persons come to poverty and distress 
 by a long course of extravagance, and after frequent 
 admonitions, though without falsehood or injustice; wc 
 plainly do not regard such people as alike objects of 
 compassion with those who are brought into the same 
 condition by unavoidable accidents. From these things 
 it appears, that prudence is a species of virtue, and folly 
 of vice : meaning hy folly ^ somewhat quite diTerent from 
 mere incapacity; a thoughtless want of that regard and 
 attention to our own happiness which we had capacity 
 for. And this the word properly includes, and as it 
 seems, in its usual acceptation ; for we scarce apply it 
 to brute creatures. 
 
 However, if any person be disposed to dispute the 
 matter, J shall very willingly give him uj Mif wordn 
 
/ 
 
 372 Analogy of Religion. [Diss. II 
 
 virtue and vice as not applicable to prudence and folly; 
 but must beg leave to insist, that the faculty wiihin us, 
 which is the judge of actions, approves of prudent ac- 
 tions, and disapproves imprudent ones; I say, prudent 
 and imprudent actions d^s^ such, and considered distinctly 
 from the happiness or misery which they occasion. And 
 by the way, this observation may help to determine Avhat 
 'ustness there is in that objection against religion, that 
 it leaches us to be interested and selfish. 
 
 Fifthly. Without inquiring how far, and in what sense, 
 virtue is resolvable into benevolence, and vice into the 
 want of it ; it may be proper to observe that benevolence, 
 and the w^ant of it, singly considered, are in no sort the 
 whole of virtue and vice. For if this were the case, in 
 the review of one's own character, or that of others, our 
 moral understanding and moral sense would be indiffer- 
 ent to every thing but the degrees in which benevolence 
 prevailed, and the degrees in which it was wanting. 
 That is, we should neither approve of benevolence to 
 some persons rather than to other.s, nor disapprove injus- 
 tice and falsehood upon any other account than merely as 
 an overbalance of happiness was foreseen likely to be 
 produced by the first, and of misery by the second. But 
 now, oA the contrary, suppose two men competitors for 
 any thing whatever, which would be of equal advantage 
 to each of them; though nothing, indeed, would be 
 more impertinent than for a stranger to busy himself to 
 get one of them preferred to the other; yet such en- 
 deavor would be virtue, in behalf of a friend or benefac- 
 tor, abstracted from all consideration of distant conse. 
 quences : as that examples of gratitude and the cultiva. 
 tion of friendship would be of general good to the world. 
 Again, suppose one man should, by fraud or violence,, 
 take from another the fruit of his labor, with intent to 
 give it to a third, who, he thought, would have as much 
 plffasure from it as would balance the i)leasure which 
 
Diss. II.] The Nature of Virtue. 373 
 
 the fir.st possessor would have had in the enjoyment, 
 and his vexation in the loss of it; suppose also that no 
 bad consequences would follow ; yet such an action 
 would surely be vicious. Nay, further, wece treachery, 
 violence, and injustice, no otherwise vicious than as fore- 
 seen likely to produce an overbalance of misery to socie- 
 ty; then, if in any case a man could procure to himself 
 as great advantage by an act of injustice as the whole 
 foreseen inconvenience likely to be brought upon others 
 by it would amount to, such a piece of injustice would 
 not be faulty or vicious at all, because it would be no 
 more than, in any other case, for a man to prefer his own 
 satisfaction to another's in equal degrees. 
 
 The fact, then, appears to be, that we are constituted 
 so as to condemn falsehood, unprovoked violence, injus- 
 tice, and to approve of benevolence to some preferably 
 to others, abstracted from all consideration which con- 
 duct is likeliest to produce an overbalance of happiness 
 or misery. And therefore, were the Author of nature to 
 propose nothing to himself as an end but the production 
 of happiness, were his moral character merely that of 
 benevolence ; yet ours is not so. Upor\, that supposi- 
 tion, indeed, the only reason of his giving us the above- 
 mentioned approbation of benevolence to some persons 
 rather than others, and disapprobation of falsehood, un- 
 provoked violence, and injustice, must be, that he fore- 
 saw this constitution of our nature would produce more 
 happiness than forming us with a temper of mere general 
 benevolence. But still, since this is our constitution, 
 falsehood, violence, injustice, must be vice in us, and 
 benevolence, to some preferably to others, virtue, ab- 
 .stractcd from all consideration of the overbalance of 
 evil or good which they may appear likely -to produce 
 
 Now if human creatures are endued with §uch a moral 
 nature as we have been explaining, or with a moral fac- 
 ulty the natural object of which is actions ; moral gov- 
 
374 Analogy of Religion. Diss. 11. 
 
 ernment must consist in rendeiing them hapjty and un- 
 happy, in rewarding and punishing them., as they follow, 
 neglect, or depart from, the moral rule of action inter- 
 woven in their nature, or suggested and enforced by this 
 moral faculty;* in rewarding and punishing them upon 
 account of their so doing. 
 
 I am not sensible that I have, in this fifth observation, 
 contradicted what any author designed to assert. But 
 some of great and distinguished merit have, I think, ex- 
 pressed themselves in a. manner which may occasion 
 some danger to careless readers, of imagining the whole 
 of virtue to consist in singly aiming, according to the 
 best of their judgment, at promoting the happiness of 
 mankind in the present state ; and the whole of vice, in 
 doing what they foresee, or might foresee, is likely to 
 produce an overbalance of unhappiness in it ; than whiciv 
 mistakes none can be conceived more terrible. For it 
 is certain, that some of the most shocking instances of 
 injustice, adultery, murder, perjury, and even of perse- 
 cution, may, in many supposable cases, not have the 
 appearance of being likely to produce an overbalance 
 of misery in the present state ; perhaps sometimes ma) 
 have the contrary appearance. For this reflection might 
 easily be carried on ; but I forbear. The happiness of 
 the world is the concern of him who is the Lord and the 
 Proprietor of it ; nor do we know what we are about, 
 when we endeavor to promote the good of mankind in 
 any ways, but those which he has directed ; that is, in- 
 deed, in all ways not contrary to veracity and justice. 
 I speak thus upon supposition of persons really endea/- 
 oring, in some sort, to do good without regard to these. 
 But the truth seems to be, that such supposed endeav- 
 ors proceed almost always from ambition, the spirit of 
 party, or some indirect principle, concealed, perhaps, in 
 great measure from persons themselves. And though it 
 ♦ Part i, chap, vij page 167. 
 
Diss, ilj The Nature of Virtue. 375 
 
 is our business and our duty to endeavor, within the 
 bounds of veracity and justice, to contribute to the ease> 
 convenience, and even cheerfulness and diversion, of 
 our fellow-creatures ; yet from our short views, it is 
 greatly uncertain whether this endeavor will, in partic- 
 i:lar instances, produce an overbalance of happiness 
 upon the whole ; since so many and distant things must 
 come into the account. And that which makes it our 
 duty, is, that there is some appearance that it will, and 
 no positive appearance sufficient to balance this, on the 
 contrary side; and also, that such benevolent endeavor 
 is a cultivation of that most excellent of all virtuous 
 principles, the active principle of benevolence. 
 
 However, though veracity, as well as justice, is to be 
 our rule of life ; it must be added, otherwise a snare will 
 be laid in the way of some plain men, that the use of 
 common forms of speech, generally understood, cannot 
 be falsehood, and in general that there can be no de- 
 signed falsehood without designing to deceive. It must 
 likewise be observed, that in numberless cases a man 
 may be under the strictest obligations to what he fore- 
 sees will deceive, without his intending it. For it is 
 impossible not to foresee that the words and actions 
 of men in different ranks and employments, and of dif- 
 ferent educations, will perpetually be mistaken by each 
 other; and it cannot but be so, while they will judge 
 with the utmost carelessness, as they daily do, of what 
 they are not, perhaps, enough informed to be competent 
 judges of, even though they considered it with great 
 attention. 
 
INDEX. 
 
 iLbstraot Reasoning, 
 
 Mav mislead, page 159. 
 
 To be applied to practical subjects with 
 great caution, 159. 
 
 Maybe, with propriety, joined with the 
 observation of facts, 37. 
 
 From the opinion of necessity, falla- 
 cious, 157, 159. 
 
 A.bBtract 
 
 Truths and matter of feet, how distin- 
 guished, 844. 
 
 Accidental 
 
 Events of which we know not the laws, 
 60 termed, 244. 
 
 Action, 
 
 This world a theater of. 150. 
 As distinguished from the thing done, 
 the chief object of religion, 289. 
 
 Actions, 
 
 Meaning of the term In moral ques- 
 tions, 868. 
 
 Pleasure and pain the consequences of 
 our, 69, 70. 
 
 To be distinguished from their moral 
 quality, as virtuous or vicious, 92. 
 
 The provision made that all their bad 
 consequences should not always ac- 
 tually follow, 252. 
 
 "Will and design constitute their nature 
 as such, 367. 
 
 Distinguished from events. 858. 
 
 "What, exercise the principle of virtue, 
 145. 
 
 Outward and inward, 128. 
 
 l^bctions, 
 
 Paiticular, form part of our inward 
 
 frame, 136. 
 In what respects subject, of right, to 
 
 conscience, 186. 
 Necessarily excited by the presence of 
 
 their objects, 137. 
 Need restraint, 137. 
 Bee J'atisio)i6. 
 
 Affliction, 
 
 The proper discipline tor resignation. 
 14S. 149. ^ 
 
 Analogy, 
 
 Butler's, a work demanded by the idmei 
 in which it was written, page 21. 
 
 Force of the argument in the, 22. 
 
 Topics embraced in the, 42. 
 
 The objection against, as being unsatis- 
 factory, answered. 340, 341. 
 
 Upon what principles the argument in 
 is conducted, 842, 343. 
 
 In general, a just and conclusive mode 
 of reasoning, 36. 87. 
 
 Origen's remark upon, 37. 
 
 May reasonably be admitted to deter- 
 mine our judgment, 35. 
 
 Lays us under an obligation to regard 
 it in practice. 35. 
 
 Requires the cases comjiared to bb .ip- 
 pai-ently similar in theresj)ects wliich 
 are the ground of inference. 64, 217. 
 
 Plan (if the, examined in this treatise, 
 42, 43. 
 
 What is assumed in this. ?,S. 
 
 Can directly only show things credible 
 as matters of fact, 164. 
 
 Yet suggests an answer to objections 
 against the goodness and wisdom of 
 the Divine conduct, 172. 
 
 Whether it would be likely to influence 
 men's practice, 345. 
 
 This unlikelihood, though granted, no 
 decisive objection against its use, 3-J2. 
 
 Design of, not to justify God"s provi- 
 dence, but to show our duties, 837. 
 
 When aj)pliid to religion, superior to 
 hypothesis and speculation. 37-39. 
 
 Affords no ground for believing tiiat 
 death will destroy our living pow- 
 ers, 49. ' 
 
 Conlirms the proof of the indiscerptl- 
 bility of living agents, 52. 
 
 Of the case of brutes no objection, 58, 59 
 
 Of vegetables. 64. 
 
 Gives credibility to the doctrine of fu. 
 ture rewards and punishments, 76. 
 
 Answers objections against future pin« 
 ishments, 77-Sl. 
 
 Between our state of trial in our tciQ- 
 poral and religious capacities, 114. 
 
 In respect of the sources of danger. 
 115,116. ^ ' 
 
 In respect of men's beur.vlor un'ier 
 it, 117, 118. 
 
 In respect of difficulties recivased by 
 outward circuBistances. 115. 119 
 
37S 
 
 Inlex. 
 
 Analogy, — continued. 
 
 Force of. in answoring objections, nnd 
 raising a positive i)resumi)tion, page 
 l'."2. 
 
 Siiirgc'sts that tliis life is a preparation 
 lor another, \^-l-VU. 
 
 Aitlioiigji we saw not how. 184. 
 
 Leads lis to expect that the future state 
 will l)e a conununii}-, 1-35. 
 
 May subsist between limitations of pns- 
 siliie peifectibility in moral character, 
 and powers bodily and intellectual, 
 U."). 
 
 Of the waste of seeds, as answering the 
 ■.)b)ection, that the present state is 
 not. to many, a discipline in virtue. 
 
 Be woen the speculative reason and 
 the moral understanding. 166. 
 
 Argument from, not affecti'd by the 
 sclieme of necessity, 152-1 T2. 
 
 Answers objections against the wisdom 
 and goodness of God's government. 
 iii'iirfictltj, 17 1. 
 
 Between God's natural and his moral 
 government, as to their vastness and 
 incomprehensilileness, 17"i, iT4. 
 
 Between the natural and the moral 
 world, as regards means and eiids, 
 177. 178. 
 
 What objections it cannot answer di- 
 rectly, 171. 
 
 Att'ords no argument against the gen- 
 eral scheme of Christianity, 212. 
 
 No presumption from, again-t a reve- 
 lation at the beginning of the world, 
 considered as mira-ulous. 21.0-217. 
 
 Supj(06ed presumptions against mira- 
 cles answered-, 217-221. 
 
 Shows objection against Christianity it- 
 self, as distinguished from objections 
 against its evidence, to be frivolous, 
 223-226. 
 
 M.ikes it jirobable that, if we judge of 
 Christianity by preconceived expec- 
 tations, we shall find many things 
 seeming liable to objecti'ins, 22.5,226 
 
 Between natural inforuuition and in- 
 spiration, 226, 227. 
 
 More jiarticularly ^)et\^een the limita- 
 tions and hinderauccs of natural in- 
 formation and the instruction afford- 
 ed us by revelation, 230, 233. 
 
 Between the use of miraculous gifts 
 and the use of the gifts of memory, 
 eloquence, etc., 231, 232. 
 
 Makes it credible that the Scripture 
 contains truths as yot undiscovered, 
 233. 
 
 Between Christianity, as a remedial 
 system, and the natural remedies for 
 di ease, 235, 236. 
 
 Answers objections against the wisdom 
 of the means used by Christianity, 
 243. 
 
 Makes it credible that the Christian 
 dispensation ma)' have been all aloug 
 earned on by general laws, 248. 
 
 Analogy, — coutiiiuod. 
 
 Answers objections against Christian- 
 itj\ as being a slowly operating and 
 complicated tv-lieme. page 246, 247. 
 
 Eemoves all piesumi)ti()n against the 
 general notion of a Mediator, 249. 
 
 Makes it "upposable \hat future pi.n- 
 ishment .."nay follow vice by way nf 
 natural consequence, 25u. 
 
 Shows that we have no reason to ':« 
 lieve that repentance alone will pre 
 vent future punishment, 25.5, 256. 
 
 Answers the objection that the deal, 
 of Christ represents God as indiffer- 
 ent whether he punishes the inno- 
 cent or the guilty, 2C6-270. 
 
 Shows that we cannot expect to have 
 the like information concerning God's 
 conduct as concerning our own duty, 
 2i;i». 270. 
 
 Answers objections from the wan^ of 
 univi-rsality in revehtion and the 
 doubtfulness of its evidence, 27J, 272. 
 
 Of a prince sending directions t > his 
 servatits. whether ap])licable tc God, 
 2S'.). 
 
 Between prophecv am! satirical and 
 mythol'igic writing. 309, 310. 
 
 Between a prophet and a compiler of 
 memoirs, 310. 
 
 Objections against arguing from the 
 analogy of nature to religion, 333- 
 .346. 
 
 See Objections. 
 
 Antiquity 
 
 Of religion, as one of its evidences, IW, 
 Antoninus, M. 
 
 Quoted, 63, 367 n. 
 Aristotle, 
 
 Quoted, 136, n. 
 Arnobius, 
 
 Quoted, 800 n. 
 Atonement, 
 
 Our ignorance of the manner in whicl» 
 the ancients understood It to be 
 made, 265. 
 
 See Sdcri/ice. 
 
 Attention, 
 
 Moral, how exercised and disciplirefl 
 by the circumstances of our trial, 115 
 
 Necessary when we consider Christi- 
 anity, 314. 
 
 AugTistine, 
 
 Quoted, 193, n. 
 Author of Nature, 
 Existence of, assumed in this treatise. 
 
 33. 
 Reveals himself to as as a righteous 
 
 Governor, 86. 
 Is delibeiate in bis. operations, 246, 247 
 
Index. 
 
 379 
 
 Bayle, P., 
 
 Probably referred to by Butler, 89, n. 
 Quoted, page 60. n. 
 
 Behavior, 
 
 Of men in their present state of trial, 
 117, lis. 
 
 Benevolence, 
 
 Absolute, defined : whether it is the 
 
 only character of God, 85. 
 God's, toward us, how limited, 86. 
 The want of it. not the whole of virtue 
 
 and vice, o"2. 373. 
 Active i)rinciple of, the most excellent 
 
 of all virtuous prinei|iles, 375. 
 True, implii'S a regard to justice and 
 
 veracity, 101, 102. 
 
 Berkeley, Bishop, 
 
 Quoted, 91 n, 15S n. 
 
 Body, 
 
 Our present, relation of, to i;3 not nec- 
 essary to thinking, 52. 
 
 Bodies. 
 
 Our organized, may be presumed to be 
 
 no part of oursi-lves, .t2. 
 Made up of org<.ns ar.d instruments of 
 
 Iierception and motion, 55-5S. 
 
 Boswell, 
 
 His life of Johnson quoted, 823 n. 
 Brahmins, 
 
 Their notion of death, 63, n. 
 Brown, Dr. John, 
 
 91, n. 
 Brute Force, 
 
 Natural tendency of reason to prevail 
 over, 99-102. 
 
 Brutes, 
 
 Question of their natural immortality 
 
 argued, 58, 59. 
 Instinct of, su|)erior in some things to 
 
 the reason of men, 230. 
 Have no reflex sense of actions, as dis 
 
 tinguished from events, 230. 
 
 Cato, 
 
 Quoted, 51. 
 Certainty, 
 Moral highest degree of probable evi- 
 dence, 83. 
 What it means, 85. 
 
 Chalmers, Dr., 
 Quoted. S4, 91, 113, IIT, 120, 124, 138, 
 ISl. 219, 222, 292. 
 
 Chance, 
 Iq reality qo nxtfiii ihing as, 244. 
 
 Changes, 
 
 Which we ha\o already undergone 
 afford a presumption in favor of a 
 future existence, p.age 45, .50-58. 
 
 The, which various creatures may un- 
 dergo without destruction, 45, 46. 
 
 Character, 
 
 What is meant by, 160 n. 
 
 Our capability of forming a new, 131. 
 
 Of virtue and piety, a necessary quail 
 fication for a future state, 134. 
 
 Our capacity of improvement therein, 
 135-142. 
 
 Our moral, to be manifested to the cre- 
 ation by means of a state of trial, 150 
 
 Childhood, 
 A state of discipline for mature age, 132. 
 
 Christ, 
 
 Our Lord, our Saviour, and our God, 
 
 204. 
 
 The scriptural representation of his in- 
 terposition as Alediator, 260-262. 
 
 His prophetical, regal, and priestly of- 
 fices. 263, 264. 
 
 His sacrifice not an .allusion to the Mo- 
 saic sacrifices, 264. 
 
 Ground of the eflicacy of his sacrifice 
 not oxjilained in Scripture, 264. 
 
 Objection ag.ninst the death of, .asapro- 
 ])iriatory sacrifice. 266-270. 
 
 Sufferings of, voluntary, 267. 
 
 Christians, 
 
 Primitive, their conversion and zeal, as 
 l>rovin2 the rt-.ality of the Scripture 
 miracles, 299, 800. 
 
 Christianity, 
 
 Not if it be from God, of small impor- 
 tance. 194. 
 
 A republication of natui-al relision, and 
 with what circumstances of advan- 
 tage, 194-201. 
 
 Hns brought life and immortality to 
 light, 196. 
 
 Preserves the knowledge of relig1on4"or 
 all ages, by means of a visible Church, 
 197. 
 
 Good effects of, not small, and alleged 
 ill effects do not properly belong to 
 it, 199. 
 
 Contains an account of a disfKjnsation 
 not discoverable by reason, carried 
 on by the Son and Spirit, 201. 
 
 Enjoins, in consequence, new duties, 
 not otherwise to be ascertained, 201. 
 202. 
 
 No presumption against the general 
 scheme of, whether considered mir- 
 aculous or not, 212-215. None, be- 
 cause it is not discoverable by reason 
 or experience, 213, 215. None, be- 
 cause it is unlike the known coutm 
 of nature, 214, 215. . . . 
 
380 
 
 Index. 
 
 Christianity, — continued. 
 
 Objections against, as distinguished 
 from objections against its evidence, 
 frivolous, page 2'23. 
 
 T'rue question concerning ir, whether 
 it be a real revelation, not whether it 
 is such a one as we naight have ex- 
 pected, 227. 
 
 What objections against, would be va- 
 lid, 228. 
 
 Practical part of, plain and obvious. 233. 
 
 Objections against, from the long delay 
 of its publication to the world, 234. 
 
 Objections against the goodness and 
 wisdom of, not v.alid, 240, 245. 
 
 See Revelation, Revealed Religion. 
 
 Christian Dispensation, 
 
 The, may appear natural to some be- 
 ings in the universe, 66. 
 
 Church, 
 
 The visible, design of the institution of, 
 
 197, 198. 
 The carrying out of its design implies 
 
 positive institutions, 198. 
 Men are bound to become members of 
 
 the. 200. 
 Circumstantial evidences of Cliristian 
 
 ity, 292, 314. 
 Often as convincing as direct testimo 
 
 ny, 830. 
 Coincidence of natural and revealed re 
 
 ligion, 224, 233. 
 Coincidences of Scripture, 296. 
 
 Cicero, 
 
 Quoted, 57. 
 Clarke, Dr. Samuel, 
 
 His " Demonstration," 154 n. 
 Coleridge, 
 
 Quoted, 93n, 103n. 
 Collins, Anthony, 
 
 Quoted, 51 n. 
 Comparison, 
 
 In what we are apt to be misled by a 
 comparison of things of greater or 
 less impoitance, 210. 
 
 What, the ground of our moral percep 
 tions and ill desert, 369. 
 
 Compassion, 
 
 Evidence of, in the original constituUon 
 
 of the world, 252. 
 Unhappiness the natural object of, 870. 
 
 Conscience, 
 
 What proof it aflFords of God's moral 
 gdvernment, 92. 9S. 
 
 How it appears that we have the. fiicul- 
 ty so called; 365, BBS. '■■• 
 
 Includes both a sentiment'of the un- 
 derstanding and a perception of the 
 heart. 866. 
 
 Has for Its ubi»x-t actions. J?r,6. 3CT. 
 
 Consciousness, 
 
 Indivisibility of, a proof of the indlvisl' 
 
 bility of the conscious being, page 51. 
 Does not constitute personal identity, 
 
 but ascertains it to ourselves, 36S, 
 
 359. 
 The doubt on this subject shown to be 
 
 groundless, 359. 
 
 Contemplation 
 
 Of the theory of virtue may warden 
 the heart, 1'28. 
 
 Cont nuance 
 
 Of all things, natural presumi^tlou in 
 fiivor of, 47, 
 
 C orrespondence 
 
 Between our nature and our conditioo 
 necessary to life and happiness, 125. 
 
 Creation, 
 
 Scripture begins with the, in order to 
 ascertain for us the true object of our 
 worship, 315. 
 
 Creature, 
 
 Notion of an upright and finitely per- 
 fect one, 137. 
 In what way such a one may fall, 139. 
 
 Credibility 
 
 Of a truth or matter of fact, distin- 
 guislied from the wisdom and good- 
 ness of it, 171, 
 
 Crooks, G. R., 
 
 Quoted, 192 n. 
 Dangers, 
 
 Implied in our state of probation for a 
 
 future life, US. 
 Perception of, a natural excitement of 
 
 passive fear and active caution, i'lQ. 
 
 Daniel, 
 
 The book of, referred to. 312. 
 
 Had probiibly greater external e\ndence 
 
 formerly than what has come down 
 
 to us, 312. 
 
 Death, 
 
 Known to us only in some of its effects, 
 49. 
 
 Not likely, from any thing we k:ow^ 
 to destroy living agents, 4S. Nor 
 tlieir prcHent powers of reflc-ation. 
 60, 61, Nor even to suapi'.nd t.ie ex- 
 ercise of those i)owers, 62-64, 
 
 Like our birih, may put usintoamor* 
 enlarged state of life, 03, 
 
 Notion of the Brahmins concerning, 
 63 n. 
 
 Definitions 
 
 Sometimes s^rve on y to perplex-, 357. 
 
 Degradation, 
 Mark* of our beir,^ in- state of 119. 
 120. 
 
Index. 
 
 381 
 
 Demonstration, 
 
 As distingruislied from probable cvi- 
 denci', jKqje 36. 
 
 Descartss, 
 
 An evauiplo of those thinkers who 
 woii'tl frame a world upon hypoth- 
 esis, o5. 
 
 Dosert, 
 
 Qood aii.l ill, the perception o£ de- 
 fined, 8G8. 
 
 Destruction 
 
 Of livi'ig powers, what it means, 4S n. 
 
 DifFereiit 
 
 De;;rees of evidence in religions mat- 
 ti rs constatent with justice, 274. 
 
 Difference 
 
 Of men's situations in religious mat- 
 ters, to be accounted for in tlie same 
 manner as their different situations 
 in other respects. 276. 
 
 Would not be prevented, tliough reve- 
 lation were universal, 277. 
 
 Difficulties 
 
 As to the evidence of religion, are anal- 
 ogous to those attending tlie practice 
 of it, 2S2. 
 
 These may be the i)rincipal part of 
 some persons' trial, 2^4. 
 
 Iti religion, unreasonab e to expect to 
 have them all cleared, 340-<J4'2. 
 
 Discipline, 
 
 Effect 01, to improve the principle of 
 
 virtue in us, 13S. 
 Needed by upright creatures, 136-140. 
 Imlispensably necessaiy for corrupt 
 
 creatures, 142. 
 This world peculi.arly fit to be a place 
 
 of, for our moral improvement, 142- 
 
 14a. 
 
 Diseases 
 
 Of the body and the mind, analogy be- 
 twe«'n the remedies for. 285, 236. 
 
 Mortal diseases, not affecting uur intel- 
 lectual powers, afford a presumption 
 that those powers will not be de- 
 stroyed by them, 01. 
 
 Are sometimes themselves remedies, 
 179. 
 
 Some operate like enthusiasm, 802. 
 
 Distress, 
 
 In others, tlie perception of a natural 
 excitement to passive piety and ac- 
 tive relief; 129. 
 
 Doubt 
 
 Implies some degi-ee of evidence for 
 that of which we donltt. 28(t. 
 
 With re^^•l^d to reliirioii. implies an ob- 
 ligaiion '11 n-c^ard it in pnuitiw.', 2S2. 
 
 Dreams, 
 
 Oti.' experience of, what it shows us, 
 pag.; uG. 
 
 Duties, 
 
 Our, to the Son and Spirit, arise out of 
 tlielr relations to us, and are strictly 
 moral, 202, 203. 
 
 Moral and positive, distinguished, 205 
 
 Earth, 
 
 Whether its appearance confirms the 
 Scripture accounts of the fall, 260. 
 
 Ecclesiastes 
 
 Quoted, 126 n. 
 End, 
 
 We are greatly ignorant how far any 
 thing is a final end in God's regard, 
 246. 
 
 The whole, for which God made and 
 governs the world, may be utterly 
 beyond the reach of our faculties, 72. 
 
 See Mtiinn and Ends, 
 
 Enthusiasm, 
 
 Christianity not such a scheme as 
 would have been mxpected from, 23S. 
 
 As an objection to tlie Christian ev- 
 idences, considered and answered, 
 301-305. 
 
 Will not account for the conversion and 
 zeal of the first Christians, 302. 
 
 lieligion not peculiarly liable to, 303. 
 
 The case of enthusiastn and knavery 
 combined considered. 303, 304. 
 
 General oh-^ervations U|)on, cannot over- 
 throw direct historical evidence, 305, 
 3UG. 
 
 Epictetus, 
 
 Qti(»ted, 365 n. 
 
 Evidence, 
 
 Probable and demonstrative, distin 
 
 guished. 33. See Pfohnble EniUence. 
 The external, for uatui-al religion, 164, 
 
 165. 
 Of Scripture, reason competent to judge 
 
 of, 238. 
 Doubt implies some degree of, 2S0. 
 Ciivum.stantial. often as convincing as 
 
 the most direct, 330. 
 Not only increased, but multiplied, by 
 
 the .atlding together of sei)ai'ate pn 'j- 
 
 able proofs, 350. 
 
 Evidence of Christianity, 
 
 The state in which it is left, not liieOL- 
 sistent with justice, 275. Not incon- 
 sistent with wisdom and goodness, 
 27()-2S4. 
 
 Doubtfulness of may put men into a 
 stateof trial. 27S-2S1. A suite of trial 
 similar to that from external '-ji- 
 (MUMstaiiees of tempiation. 2-^2-2n'S. 
 
 Our 'lif»<:iti<faction wiih, may lie i*iir 
 own liiuiu i-^-i. 2Sfi. 
 
^82 
 
 Index. 
 
 Evidence of Christianity — con'd. i 
 Lies level to men of common capacity, 
 
 j)ages 2S7, '2SS. 
 Total result of the direct and rollateral. 
 
 may be compared with the ejf'tcl in 
 
 architecture, '2i);3. 
 Direct and circuiiig^^ntial, view of, as 
 
 forminf,' one argument, 31S-3o2. 
 Safer to admit it, than lo reject it, 331. 
 Cannot, from its nature, be destroyed, 
 
 though it may be lessened, 332. 
 True question with regard 10,341. 
 
 Evil, 
 
 Origin of, 71, 124. 
 
 Prevalence of, no argument against the 
 
 power or goodness of God, 71 n. 
 i*ermission of, may be beneficial to the 
 
 world, 178. 
 Yet would liave been better if men had 
 
 refrained from it, 179. 
 Beliefs and remedies originally provided 
 
 for, 253. 
 
 Example and Education, 
 
 Effect of a bad, in increasing the dan- 
 gers of our state of trial, US. 
 
 Existence, 
 
 Necessary, in wh'at sense attributed to 
 God, 153. 
 
 Experience 
 
 Teaches us the good and bad conse- 
 quences of our actions, 261). 
 
 How it conGrms the unitv of the mind, 
 52. 
 Experimental 
 
 Observations cannot prove the simplic- 
 ity of a living agent, 53. 
 
 External * 
 
 Objects, as related to the particular 
 affections of our nature, 136. 
 
 Circumstances, one of the sources of 
 trial in our present state, 115. 
 
 Faculties, 
 
 Human, not given us in their full per- 
 fection at ■)ar birth, 131. 
 
 Not adequate to discover how the world 
 miglit be best constituted, 3'.), 40. 
 
 Ridiculous to attempt to prove the 
 truth of. 364. 
 
 Fall of Man, 
 
 Explicable, from the nature of particu- 
 
 lai- affecfons, 131>. 
 Not accounted fur, solely from the 
 
 jirinHjile of liberty, 139, 140. 
 Appearances of a, in nature, 119. 
 Our condition resulting from the, does 
 
 not afford just matter of complaint, 
 
 119. 
 The Christian dispensation grounded 
 
 upon the suppoiiition of a. 2r)7. 
 Tlie scriptural account of it analogous 
 
 and conformable to what we sec and 
 
 exp«nience, 260. 
 
 Falsehood, 
 
 The several kinds or it, page 30*. 
 Whether the use of certain forias ffi 
 sjieech is, 375. 
 
 FataUst, The, 
 
 His scheme of the world stated, 153. 
 Shown, by ])ertinent examples, to l)e 
 
 absurd in practice, 1.^6-159. 
 His objection to the justice of pur. ih' 
 
 ments refuted, 160. 
 Keligious and irreligious fataliste -is- 
 
 tinguished, 169, 170. 
 
 Fate. 
 
 See NecesHity. 
 
 Fear and Hope, 
 
 Legitimate moral motives. 147. 
 
 Of future ]>unishment and reward, can- 
 not be got rid of by greater part of 
 the worlil, 94. 
 
 Final Causes, 
 
 The notion of. does not always imply 
 
 that the end designed is answereo, 
 
 146. 
 The i>leasures and pains attending our 
 
 actions, instances of, 76. 
 The proof from, of the existence Oi 
 
 God, not destroyed by the schemes 
 
 of necessity, 154. 155. 
 
 Fitness, Moral, 
 
 Whether, and in what sen<5e, it deter 
 mines the wid of God. 163 n. 
 
 The proof of leligion from, not in- 
 sisted on in this treatise. 163, 343. 
 
 And unfitness »)f actions, in what sense 
 understood, 369, 370. 
 Fitzgerajld, Professor, 
 
 Quoted, 83, 37. 46, 71. S7, 104, iOS, 111, 
 130, 136, 15S, 169 ITl, 191, 196, 206, 
 216, 233, 239, 294, 323, 366. 
 
 Folly, 
 
 Delined and shown to be akin to v:c<3, 
 
 370, 371. 
 Of mankind, as to present an:^ ^'iture 
 
 interests compared, 116, 117 
 
 Future State, 
 
 A, will probably be a socio! one, 65. 
 135. 
 
 Question of, whv so importact to us, 
 69. 
 
 Three questions relative to, contivlered, 
 62 n. 
 
 Demonstration of, not of itself a prool 
 of religion, 63. Yet impUed in re- 
 ligion, 66. 
 
 Security of the good in, may be de- 
 rived fr-jui the habit!- foruied in a 
 state o*" probation. 143. 
 
 This li*-"^ st.'ite of diseipline for, Ji L 
 ell. V 
 
Index 
 
 333 
 
 Future Rewards and Punish- 
 ments, 
 
 Will diiTer only in degree from those 
 of our present state, pige 109. 
 
 As conceived by natural reason, nnd 
 as specially described in Scripture, 
 80 n. 
 
 Future Punishments, 
 
 Gt^neral eonsidf-ration of, belongs to 
 
 natural reliirii'ii, 110. 
 Doctrine of. shown by analogy to be 
 
 alto<retlier credible. T7-sil. 
 May follow vice, by way of natural 
 
 consequence. 250. 
 Reformation and repentance alone tn- 
 
 snfficient to i»revei't them, 256. 
 See I'uniahvients. 
 
 General Laws, 
 
 The manifest wisdom of carrying on 
 the natural government of the world 
 by me:ms ot^ 170. 
 
 Interruptions of, would produce evil 
 and {)revent good, ISO. 
 
 Credible that tiie Christian dispensation 
 mav have been, all along, carried on 
 >«v." 243-245. 
 
 Miracles may proceed from, 244. 
 
 Only from analogy that we conclude 
 the ichdle course of nature to be car- 
 ried on by. 244. 
 
 Gifts, 
 
 Superior, not always bestowed on per- 
 sons of prudence and decency, 231, 
 232. 
 
 God, 
 
 True idea of, that of a governor, 76. 
 Uis existence: Why taken for granted 
 
 in this treatise, .38. 
 His existence: Not di-;proved by the 
 
 scheme of lataUsm. l.'(3, 154. 
 His existence : In what sense necessa- 
 ry. 154. 
 His will: How determined, 163 n. 
 His will may be considered as absolute 
 
 or conditional, 270. 
 Resignation to his will, an essential part 
 
 of -.iitue. 14S, 149. 
 "What temper of mind in us corre- 
 
 spoi ds to his sovereignty, 149. 
 His laracter, what is meant by, as 
 
 applied tu him, 160. 
 His goodness: May seek to make only 
 
 the good happy. 72. 
 His goodness shown by experience to 
 
 be nogo'Hl ground lor expectitig him 
 
 to make us hai)py all at once. loO. 
 Does liot give us the same information 
 
 concerning his conduct as concerning 
 
 our duty, 26'J, 270. 
 Dictates of conscience concerning, the 
 
 laws of. 162. 
 'Jur duties to God the Father; to the 
 
 8on and to the Holy Spirit, 201-20;}. 
 
 God's Government, 
 
 End of probably bcyona. tho reach of 
 our faculties, pnge 72. 
 
 His iiatnriil government of us, by in- 
 wards and punishments, 69-S2. 
 
 The course of nature but another nntri*;. 
 for, 75. 
 
 Not the less certainly established, 
 thouirh in it he act not immediate- 
 ly. 74, 75. 
 
 His Moral : Proofs of its existence and 
 operation, 85-112. 
 
 Not 3'et, in this present state, carried 
 on to its perfection, 87. Yet tends to 
 perfection, 99. 
 
 His natural and moral government 
 compared, 171-1S3. 
 
 Natural and Moral, mny both together 
 make up one scheme, 173, 174. 
 
 Likely that, as his natural government 
 is a scheme beyond our comprehen- 
 sion, the moral may be such a one 
 too, 172-177. 
 
 His visible government over the TV'orld 
 exercised by the mediation of others, 
 91, 249. 
 
 God's Providence, 
 
 The series of his providential dispensa 
 
 tions progressive, 2:iD, 234. 
 Objections to his | fovidence usually 
 
 founded on our ignorance, 175. 
 How f:ir we .ire concerned to answer 
 
 objections against, 337-339. 
 
 Good and Evil, 
 
 Natural the gi-eat variety and seeming 
 inequaUty of their disu-ibution, 271, 
 272. 
 
 Good Men, 
 
 Disposed to befriend ;;ood men, aa 
 
 such, 94. 
 DitKculties in the way of their uoion 
 
 with each other here, 103. 
 
 Goodness, 
 
 The Divine. See God. 
 Government, 
 
 The formal notion of, what it consists 
 in, 74. 
 
 Natural and moral defined, and distin- 
 guished from each other, S4, S5. 
 
 Domestic and civil, ordained of God, 
 95. 
 
 Punishes vice as such, and as hui-tfaJ 
 to society, 95. 
 
 Grotius, 
 
 Quote<l, 2S6 n. 
 Guilt, 
 
 The idea of. always a.^sociaied in oav 
 minds with that of ill desert, 860. 
 
 Guizot, 
 
 Quoted, 24B n. 
 
f 
 
 384 
 
 Index. 
 
 Habits, 
 
 Defined, 127 
 
 Uur capacity of acq liring them, 127. 
 
 Pisiinjruislied as ) abits of percej)tion 
 and habits of ac tion, habits of body, 
 and habits of mod. jiau'C 127. 
 
 Active, may be gnwing stronger, while 
 passive Impressions are becoming 
 weaker, 12S, 12J. 
 
 Of mind, produ<;ed by the exertion of 
 inward practical priiiciples, 128. 
 
 The acquisition of, necessary to us, 131. 
 
 Of virtue, uecessary to all rational crea- 
 tures, whether virtuous or depraved, 
 135. 
 Happiness, 
 
 Our i)resent. raainlj' depends upon our 
 own behavior, 60, "(t. 
 
 "Why not given to all promiscuously, 
 without regard Id conduct, 70, 72. 
 
 A result from our nature and condition 
 jointly, 125. 
 
 Of virtue, possibility of exceptions to, 
 88. 98. 
 
 Virtue produces, and tfnr/ft to produce 
 it in asiiil higher degree than at pres- 
 ent, 8'J-95, 99-106. 
 
 The fact that our present, is not to 
 be secured without ditliculty and 
 trial, makes it credible that tlie same 
 may be true of our fnUirc, 116, 117. 
 
 Of mankind, the aiming at, without re 
 gard to veracity unci justice, not a 
 correct idea of virtue. 374. 
 
 Heathen 
 
 World, state of, shows the importance 
 of revealed religion, 191. 
 
 DiflFei-ent relations of the, to the genu- 
 ine Scripture revelation, 274. 
 
 Hinderances, ^ 
 
 The present, of the natural tendencies 
 of virtue, only accidental. 111. 
 
 History, 
 
 What account it gives of the origin of 
 
 religion, 160, 217. 
 The whole of revelation, including 
 
 prophecy and doctrine, m.ay be con 
 
 sidered as a hi^t^ry, 315. 
 The common, in Scripture, altogether 
 
 credible, 322. 
 The failure to invalidate the Scripture 
 
 liistory, a strong argument in its fa 
 
 vor, 317, 3 IS. 
 
 Hume, 
 
 Referred to, 108 n., 218 n. 
 
 Identity, 
 
 Or sameness, different senses of the 
 
 word, 358. 
 In what sense applied to persons, 357. 
 Kot constituted by consciousness, but 
 
 ascertained by it, 35S. 
 Absurdity of the supposition that we 
 
 are uot the same beings in successive 
 
 periods of time, 362, 363. 
 
 Ignorance, Our, 
 
 //(??o this life is a preparation for an- 
 other, no objection against the credi- 
 bility of its being so, page 134. 
 
 Of the scheme of nature and of Provi- 
 dence. 174, 175. 
 
 Partial and total, distinguished, ISl. 
 
 When an answer to objections against 
 God's method of government, uad 
 when not, 177, 181. 
 
 Even total ignorance of the covn«- 
 quences of our actions would not in- 
 validate moral obligation, 1S2. 
 
 The argument from, cannot be used 
 equally for or against rehgion, 183. 
 
 Arguments from, rather taken from 
 what analogy teaches us about it, 
 183. 
 
 In connection with the question of th« 
 credibility of miracles, 219, 244. 
 
 In matters of religion, owing frequrnt- 
 ly to men's negligence and prejudices, 
 2S5, 286. 
 
 Of the nature of our condition, natural 
 and moral, and the reasons why we 
 are placed in it, 2To, 276. 
 
 Imagination, 
 
 The source of erroneous presumptions 
 that death will destroy us, 50. 
 
 Must not be substituted for experience, 
 64. 
 
 Men of warm, apt to fancy coincidences, 
 330. 
 
 Immorality, 
 The charge of, against certain precepts 
 
 in Scripture, 237, 238. 
 Not valid, 237. 
 Improvement, 
 Of our faculties, in all respects gradual, 
 
 131. 132. 
 Our capacity for, 125-131. 
 Necessity for our, in virtue, 131-134. 
 Effected by the acquisition of moral 
 and religious habits, 135. 
 
 Innocent, 
 
 Persons, are appointed, In the course 
 of nature, to suffer for the guilty, 
 267. 
 Inspiration, 
 
 In what manner or degree it should 
 be vouchsafed to mankind, not ascer- 
 tainable by reason, 226, 227. 
 
 Interest, 
 
 Sense of, defined, 187 n 
 
 In wnat sense consistent ^vitb vidua, 
 and part of its idea, 137 n. As coii- 
 cident. with virtue, needs strengthen- 
 ing by discipline, 137 n. 
 Irregularities, 
 
 Apparent, in nature and in Christian- 
 ity, whence they arise. 245. 
 
 Unreasonable to expect them to b<» 
 remedied by occasional interposi 
 tions, ISO. 
 
Index. 
 
 385 
 
 frreligion, 
 Its aggravated guilt, beyond that of 
 
 other vice, page 254. 
 Especially in persons of high rank and 
 
 character, 2^0. 
 Not justifiable upon any pretense of 
 
 want uf evidence in religion, 2S2. 
 
 Jews, 
 
 A summary of their history, as a na- 
 tion, 324-326. 
 
 Their history, as contained in Script- 
 ure, confirmed by known fact, 324. 
 
 God's dealing with them, 825. 
 
 Continuance of the, as a distinct people 
 in their dispersion, a standing mira- 
 cle, and a confirmation of the truth 
 of Scripture, 826. 
 
 Final restoration of the, 32T, 
 
 John, Saint, 
 
 To what he probably alludes in the be- 
 ginning of his Gospel, 815. 
 
 His doctrine of Christ's pre-existence 
 conformable to that of St. Paul, 316. 
 
 His description of the perfection of re- 
 ligion, 339. 
 
 Kingdom, 
 
 Idea of a perfectly virtuous and happy, 
 
 105, 106. 
 Christ's, as described in Scripture, 263. 
 
 Knowledge, 
 Our, of Scripture, will be perfected in 
 the same way as our knowledge of 
 nature, 233. 
 Natural and ordinary methods of im- 
 proving it, 233. 
 ' Analogy of the progress of natural and 
 religious, 234. 
 
 Koran, 
 
 Quoted, 298 n. 
 
 Language, 
 
 In Its very nature, liable to infinite 
 abuse. 230. 
 Law, Bishop, 
 Quoted, 73 n. 
 
 Liberty, 
 
 Does not, of Itself, account for the fall 
 
 of finite creatures, 139. 
 Why the prodf of rehgion from, is 
 
 omitted in tliis treatise, 343, 344. 
 Lnplied in the constitution of tlie world, 
 
 and our condition therein, 15S. 
 Doctrine of, siiows wliere the fallacy 
 
 lies in the sclu-meof necessity, when 
 
 reduced to practice, 167. 
 
 Life, 
 
 Our present, a probation for a future 
 one. As implying trial and danger, 
 113-122. As intended for moral dis- 
 cipline. 12.')-].')0. For the manifesta- 
 tion of cluamcter, 150. 
 
 fnu0 Future /.(/>- 
 
 25 
 
 Likeness, 
 
 Various species ol^ defined, page 88 n 
 
 Living Powers, 
 
 Twofold sense of the phrase, 48 n. 
 Our, not likely to be destroy'>d by 
 
 death, 4S-64. 
 Their not being exercised, does n't 
 
 imply theu- non-existence, 49. 
 
 Locke, 
 
 Quotation from his chapter on Prob.'.- 
 bility, 34. 
 
 His notion of personal Identity exam- 
 ined, 360, 361. 
 
 Locomotive 
 Powers, to what they properly belong, 
 66. 
 
 Mohammedanism 
 
 Was not received in the world on the 
 footing of public miracles, 298. 
 
 Maimonides, * 
 
 Quoted, 174 n. 
 Manasses, 
 
 Prayer of, quoted, 259 n. 
 Mandeville, Dr., 
 
 Quoted, 91 n. 
 Man, 
 An inferior part of creation, 119. 
 Capable of improvement, 135. 
 Connected with present, past, and ftl- 
 
 ture, 184, 
 Dealt with as if free, 158. 
 Has a moral nature, 96. 
 His fall not accounted for by his ftee 
 
 agency, 139. 
 Knows nothing fully, 174. 
 May become qualified for new states, 
 
 126. 
 Not a competent judge of the scheme* 
 
 of God, 175. 
 Eequires moral culture, 135. 
 Accepted according to what he hath, 
 
 His circumstances no ground of com- 
 plaint, 277. 
 His obligation to study the Scriptmei, 
 
 21 1, 290. 
 Must be renewed, 205. 
 
 Martyrs, 
 
 The primitive : their sufferings a testi- 
 mony to the truth of the ChiifltUtt 
 miracles, 299. 800. 
 
 Matter, 
 
 Indiscerptibilitj of its elemenUry pi^ 
 tides by any natural power, 63. 
 
 Our being affected by, aoes not proTt 
 it to be pai-t of ourselves, 68 
 
 S«e Bodjf. 
 
( 
 
 \S6 
 
 Index. 
 
 Matter of Pact, 
 
 TUo system of reliylofl riexred as, irre- 
 spective of all speculation, page 161. 
 
 Distinjfuished froin abstract truth, 311. 
 
 Objections to Christianity as, answered, 
 Part II, chap. iii. 
 
 Means and Ends, 
 
 Events are related to each other as, ITT. 
 
 Our incom])etency, prior to experience, 
 to judge of either, 178. 
 
 No presumption against the wisdom of 
 the means used by Christianity, 243. 
 
 The objection that they are complicat- 
 ed, and of slow operation, answered, 
 246-24S. 
 
 Mediator, 
 
 So presumption from the course of na- 
 ture against the general notion of a, 
 249. 
 
 Scripture view of his office, 260-264. 
 
 Christian docti-ine of, in what respect 
 most objected to, 266. 
 
 This objection answered, 26T-270. 
 
 See Sdcri/ice. 
 
 Microscopes and Glasses, 
 Our organs of perception compared 
 with, 55, 65. 
 
 MiU, J. S., 
 
 Quoted, 218 n. 
 Miracles 
 
 Prove the system of natural religion 
 as well as the revealed, 195, 196. 
 
 No presumption against, at the begin- 
 ning of the world, 215, 216. 
 
 The incarnation of Christ an invisible 
 miracle, 214. 
 
 No argument from analogy against, 
 after the settlement of the course of 
 nature, 217. 
 
 No greater presumption against, than 
 against ordinary facts before pr<jof, 
 219. 
 
 Occasions may arise for, in the cour.se 
 of ages, 220. 
 
 The moral system of the world gives 
 distinct reasons for, 220. 
 
 Must be compared with the extraordi- 
 nary phenomena of nature, '220. 
 
 May be subject to general laws, 244, 
 
 The Christian, are recorded in books of 
 authentic, genuine history. 293-296. 
 
 The reality and truth of, affirmed in 
 the epistles of St. Paul, 296, 297. 
 
 'Ji.ristianity first preached and i-eceived 
 upon the allegation of 297-300. 
 
 Mohammedan and Popish not parallel, 
 293, 299. 
 
 'Scripture history gives the same evi- 
 dence f r. as for comincin facts, 293. 
 
 Truth of them, accounts for the his- 
 toiv, 295. 
 
 11 ow "referred to in St. PauFs epistles, 
 291. 
 
 Miracles, — continued. 
 
 What j>roof of their reality fr^trt tb« 
 conversion and zeal of the irst Chnu- 
 tians, page 299. 
 
 Miraculous 
 
 Gifts, in the apostolic age; the objection 
 from their disorderly exercise an- 
 swered, 231, 232. 
 
 What events, seemingly Qatnrali in«y 
 be so esteemed, 326. 
 
 Mistakes 
 
 Of transcribers of Scripture: no mors 
 than were to have been expected In 
 books of such antiQnity, 823. 
 
 Moral 
 
 Action, whether the nature of, can ba 
 
 altered by a command, 237. 
 Duties, arise from revealed relations, 
 
 as well as from those made know n by 
 
 reason, 206. 
 Faculty, our: its dictates the laws ol 
 
 God, in a sense including sajictions^ 
 
 162. 
 Hence, affords a proof of religion not 
 
 to be invalidated by fatiilism, 162. 
 See Conxcience. 
 
 Government. See Governmavt. 
 Evil, voluntary in its very notion, 124. 
 Our inal)iiitj^ to account for. 124. 
 Part of religion, why preferred in 
 
 Scripture to the positive. 208-211. 
 Precejits. See Positive. 
 Understanding, our. liable to be im- 
 paired and perverted, 166. 
 
 Morality, 
 
 Of Scripture, reason competent to judge 
 of. 236, 237. 
 
 Of actions, depends chietly on the in- 
 tention of the agent, 36.5, 366. 
 
 Partly, also, on a comparison of his in- 
 tentions with his nature and capaci- 
 ties, 367. 
 
 Motion, 
 
 Sufiposed indivisible, comparef* wltb 
 consciousness, 51. 
 
 Mysteries 
 
 To be expected, if we judge fW»tn es 
 poriencp, in such a scheme as Chri* 
 tianity. 224, 243. 
 
 As great in nature as in Christiunity. 
 244, 245, 266-270. 
 
 Nature, 
 
 Light of. insufficient, 191. 
 
 Teachings of. as to a future siAte and 
 the cllicacy of repentance, 79 n, 254* 
 257. 
 
 Course of, implies an operating agent, 
 73, 252. 
 
 No presumption against revealed relig- 
 ion, from its being unlike the, 2/4, 
 214. 
 
I'NDEX. 
 
 3»7 
 
 rrature, — continued. 
 
 How nseortained to be by general laws, 
 
 pages 'li-i. 244. 
 Is nt)t a lixed, but a progressive scheme. 
 
 Go. 
 Our ignorance of the causes, etc., on 
 
 wliich it depends 220. 
 We know not what is the, upon the 
 
 first peopling of worlds. 215. As a 
 
 sourcfc of our trial, 115, 116. 
 
 CTatural, 
 
 True sense of the term, 65. 
 
 Our notion of what is, may be enlarged 
 
 by a gi eater knowledge of the works 
 
 and the providence of God, 65. 
 God's natui-al government probably 
 
 subsei-\'ient to his irioral. 174. 
 Eeligion, Cliristiaiiity a rei)ublication, 
 
 and an external institution, of, 194- 
 
 200. 
 See Government — Religion. 
 
 Necessary 
 
 Existence of God, in what sense to be 
 understood, 154. 
 
 Necessity, 
 
 Oj'inion of, Butler's mode of consider- 
 ing. 152. 
 
 Does nut exclude deliberation and 
 choice. 154. 
 
 Does not destroy the proof of an intelli- 
 gent author and governor of nature, 
 155. 
 
 Supposed reconcilable with the course 
 of nature, is reconcilable also with 
 the sys^ewi of religion, 155-160. 
 
 Does not destroy the proof of religion, 
 161-164. 
 
 However true in speculation, yet shown 
 by experience to be false in practice, 
 156-150. 
 
 The attributes of veracity, benevolence, 
 and justice in God, reconcilable with, 
 160. 
 
 The conclusion from, that it is incred- 
 ible that God should reward and pun- 
 ish us, fallacious, 166, 16S. 
 
 In what sense destructive of religion, 
 and in wiiat sense not, 169. 
 
 Negligence 
 
 No more excusable in matters of re- 
 vealed, than of natural religion. 200. 
 
 Is f^ne source of our dissatisfaction with 
 the evidence of religion, 2S6, '^sT. 
 
 Newman» 
 
 Quoted, 256 n. 
 
 Objections, 
 
 Against a proof, and against the thing 
 
 to be proved, ditferent, 42. 
 How far analogy answers both, in the 
 
 case of reli<;ii'n. 42. 
 Against I he wisduni and goodness of 
 
 things, not directly answered by an.al- 
 
 ogy. ITl. 
 
 Objections,— continued. 
 
 Ag.iinst the scheme of Christianity, is 
 distinguished from its evidence, gen* 
 endly frivolous, images 212, 222-227. 
 
 What would be valid, 22S. 
 
 Drawn from ijrnorance, when pecalixr- 
 ly absurd. 209 
 
 "What qualifications requisite for tha 
 
 _ due considering, 2SS. 
 
 May be seen thiough, though notckarec 
 up, 288. 
 
 Igainsi the whole way of reasoning 
 from analogv of nature to religion, 
 considered. Part II, chap, viii, 
 
 1. That it does not clear up difficul 
 ties, .3:^4. 
 
 2. That it does not show the evi- 
 dence of religion not to be doubt- 
 ful, 336-3;33. 
 
 8. That it does not vindicate God's 
 character, .338. 
 
 4. That it is not satisfactorj', 340. 
 
 5. That it is not likely to have iudu- 
 ence, 342. 
 
 Against our natural immortality from 
 tlie case of brutes, 5S. 
 
 From that of vegetables, 64. 
 
 Aganst the credibility of future punish- 
 ments, 77. 
 
 Against the final triumph of virtue, lOS. 
 
 Against this world's being a state ol 
 trial, how answered by analogy, 122. 
 
 A state of discipline in virtue^ from 
 ignorance of the mode, l;U. 
 
 From its proving, in fact, a discipline in 
 vice, 145. 
 
 From its being a disciphne in self-love, 
 147. 
 
 No practical, from the scheme of neces- 
 sity, against religion. 152, 163. 
 
 Against the scheme of Providence, gen 
 erally mere ;u-bitrary assertion.s, 176. 
 
 Drawn from seeming irregularities in 
 the moral world, answered by the 
 analogy of the natural, 177. 
 
 Against the dispensations of Provi- 
 dence, how far we are concerned to 
 answer them, 338. 
 
 Against Christianity, from the suffi- 
 ciency of the light of nature, 191,192. 
 
 Against its proof, from the supposed 
 incredibility of miracles, 212-220. 
 
 Why the m.-itter of Christianity must 
 appear liable to. Part II, chap. iii. 
 
 From the unequal distribution of xelig- 
 ious knowledge, 226. 
 
 From its complex contrivances and 
 slow development, 234. 
 
 From supposed immorality of some cf 
 its precepts, 236. 
 
 From its disappointing ant'cipatlona, 
 230. 
 
 Frtiin tne abase of miraculous gifts, 
 231. 
 
 From its being perverted, and having 
 little influence, 199. 
 
 From its myateriousness. 241. 269. 
 
 From it* want of nniv.rsalitv. .TJ- .'"& 
 
388 
 
 Index. 
 
 Objections, — continued. 
 
 From supposed deficiency of proolj 
 pages '2SU-291. 
 
 Against tli« Scripture doctrine of a Me- 
 (liatttr. Part II, cliap. v. 
 
 Against Christ's sacrifice, as involving 
 an unjust punishment of tlio inno- 
 cent for tlie guilty. 266 
 
 Tliis objection, if of force, would hold 
 more strongly against the course of 
 nature, Why ? 207. 
 
 Against the particular evidence for 
 ChridtLanity, Part II, chap. vii. 
 
 Against the evidence for miracles, 299- 
 8G4. 
 
 From enthusiasm, 301-303. 
 
 From the mixture of enthusiasm and 
 knavery, 803. 
 
 From stories of false miracles, 304, 805. 
 
 To the evidence of prophecy, 296-313. 
 
 From the obscurity of some parts of 
 prophecy, 807 
 
 From the application of particular 
 prophecies not appearing when con- 
 sidered each distinctly, 308. 809. 
 
 From the supposition that the proph- 
 ets intended somethinir else, 310-312. 
 
 Against Christianity offered in conver- 
 sation, what advantage they have, 
 832. 
 
 Obligations 
 
 Of duty, arising from the supposable- 
 ness or credibiUty of religion, 182, 
 278, 279. 
 
 Our, to the Son and Holy Spirit, from 
 what they arise, 202, 203. 
 
 Obscurities 
 In the Scriptures, no valid objection 
 against them, 228, 229, 
 
 Optimism, 
 
 Keligious and irreligious, distinguished, 
 87 n. 
 
 Origen, 
 
 His observation relative to the Script- 
 ures and nature, 37. 
 
 Passions, 
 
 As making part of our state of trial. 116. 
 Are e.vcited toward particular objects, 
 
 whether we Avill or no, 136. 
 Bare excitement of, not criminal, 137. 
 Yet always dangerous, 137. 
 The principle of virtue the intended 
 
 stc'irity .against this danger. 137. 
 How the fall uiay be accounted for from 
 
 them, 139. 
 Supposable that they may remain in a 
 
 future Slate, 138 
 Are often incunsistent with reasonable 
 
 self-love, as well as with virtue and 
 
 religion, 116. 
 
 Passive Impressions 
 
 Grow weaker by repetition. 12S. 
 Were intended to le id to the formation 
 of active, practical h.abits. 12S, I-,0. 
 
 Paul, Saint. 
 
 His testimony: to bo considered as de» 
 
 tiched from that of the rest of tbo 
 
 apostles, p.ige 297. 
 Ilis epistles: evidcnco of their genu- 
 
 inciiess, '296. 
 A distinct proof of Christianity to be 
 
 derived from them, 29(1. 
 
 Perception, 
 
 Our organs of sense merely the instrn- 
 
 ments of, 65. 
 Our power of, in dreams, without tha 
 
 organs of sense, 56. 
 Kidiculous to dispute the truth of our 
 
 Ijerceptions, 864. 
 
 Perfect 
 
 Creatures described, 189. May bo Im- 
 proved by habits of virtue, 140. 
 Moral government, what is, 85. 
 
 Perfection 
 
 Of religion, what, 839. 
 Of moral government, 85. 
 
 Person 
 Defined, 60. 
 
 Sameness of, independently of all con- 
 sideration of consciousness, 357. 
 
 Personality, 
 
 Whether constituted by consciousness, 
 361-363. 
 
 Plato 
 
 Quoted, 57. 93. 
 
 Pleasure and pain 
 
 The consequence of our own actions, TO. 
 The annexing of, to our actions, the 
 
 proper notion of government, 75. 
 Pleasure, attending the gratification of 
 
 our passions, whether and how far 
 
 intended to put us upon gratifying 
 
 them, 74. 
 Attached to actions when a reward, 
 
 85, 98. 
 Whether our pleasures overbalance our 
 
 pains. 340. 
 See //(tppiness. 
 
 Porphyry. 
 
 Ills objections to the book of Daniel, 
 
 312, 313. 
 
 Positive Institutions 
 
 Implied in the notion of a visllk 
 Church, 197. 
 
 Are founded on natur.il religion, as 
 well as on revealed, 207, 208. 
 
 In general, have the nature of moral 
 commands, 207. 
 
 Mankind prone to place the whole of 
 religion in the observance of, with- 
 out regard to moral, [irecepts, 208. 
 
 Great presumption to make light o^ 
 21U. 
 
Index. 
 
 389 
 
 Positivo — continued. 
 
 Preeepts. wherein diflFerent from moral, 
 page 206. 
 
 In wliat cases tliey must yield to moral, 
 207, 208. 
 
 Duties, distinguished from moral. 206. 
 
 And moral duties should be compared 
 no further than as they are different, 
 207. 
 
 Chi'ist's decision upon the relation be- 
 tween them, 209, 210. 
 
 Powers 
 
 May be improved by exercise, 127. 
 May be overtTsked. Ii5. 
 May exist and not be exercised, 49. 
 No i-eason for supposing that death will 
 destroy them, 50. 
 
 Practice, 
 
 By what evidence matters of, are de- 
 termined, 836, 337, 340-342. 
 
 In matters of, their importance is al- 
 ways to be considered. 36, 331. 
 
 In mattei-8 of, less proof than convinces 
 judgment should influence behavior, 
 85, 278, 279, 201. 
 
 Precepts, 
 
 None in Scripture, contrary to immu- 
 table moi-ality, 281. 
 
 Prejudices, 
 
 Several sorts of, 803. 
 
 May hinder us from being rightly in- 
 formed upon moral and religious sub- 
 jects, 285, 286. 
 
 Arising from contempt and scorn, weak- 
 ness of yielding to them, 818. 
 
 Present existence 
 
 Affords a presumption of continuance, 
 
 47. 
 
 Presumption, 
 
 A slight, docs not beget that degree of 
 conviction, implied in calling a thing 
 probabi)' true, 33. 
 
 The slightest possible, of the nature of 
 probability. 33. 
 
 That death will destroy us, 50. 
 
 That it will suspend our existence, 62. 
 
 Frestunptuousness 
 Unjustifiable, 83. 
 
 Priest, 
 Christ described as our, 263, 264. 
 
 Irobable evidence 
 
 Defined and distinguished from demon- 
 stration. 33. 
 
 Foundation of, 8:3. Eelative to finite 
 beings only, 80. 
 
 Men, of necessity, influenced and gov- 
 erned by, both in speculation and In 
 practice, 86. 86. . 
 
 Probable proofk t)eing added together, 
 lunltip )• tlie ovideuce, 330. 
 
 Probation, 
 
 The peculiar, of pei-sons of a reflective 
 cast of mind, page 2S4. 
 
 Implied in religion, 290. 
 
 Keligion, considered as a probation, has 
 had its end on all persons to whom it 
 has been proposed, with evidence suf- 
 ficient to influence practice, 342. 
 
 See Trial. 
 
 Prophecy, 
 
 The primary design of the propheclos 
 recorded in Scripture, 195. 
 
 IIow they confirm natural religion, 195. 
 
 Proof of foresight from the completion 
 of intelligible i)arts of prophecy, not 
 invalidated by the obscurity of oihei-s, 
 807. 
 
 The proof of foresight made out by a 
 general completion of, 307, 303. 
 
 The ai)piicability of a long series of, to 
 certain events, a proof that it was in- 
 tended of them, 303, 309. 
 
 The analogy, in this respect, between 
 prophecy and satirical and mytholog- 
 ical composition, 309, 810. 
 
 IIow i)articular prophecies were inter- 
 preted by the ancient Jews and the 
 primitive Christians, 309. 
 
 Proof from, not destroyed by sho^ving 
 that the prophets applied them to 
 other events than we do, or that we 
 do not apply them to right ones, 31G, 
 311. 
 
 Of the future condition of the Jews, 
 confirmed by their past and present 
 history. 326, 327. 
 
 The qualifications requisite to tike the 
 force of the argument from, 327. 
 
 Conformity between the projiheciesand 
 the events, not accidental, 330, 
 
 Prophet, 
 
 A, compared with a compiler of mem* 
 oirs received from another person, 
 310. 
 
 Christ a, in what sense, 263. 
 
 Providence, 
 
 Never hasty, 245 n. 
 0^>jections to, useless. 
 The course of, progressive, 248. 
 See God. 
 
 Prudence, 
 
 Meaning of the word, 8T0. 
 
 When a course of action may bt Cfil'cd 
 
 I)rudent, 342. 
 And imprudence, akin to virtue and 
 
 vice, 90, 869, 370. 
 
 Public spirit. 
 
 The true notion of, 101. 
 
 Punishment, 
 The proper notion.oC 76. 
 Natural, circumstantes in, .anBlojfoUi 
 
 to what rehgion teaches of fUtoro^ 
 
 T7-SI. 
 
39^ 
 
 Index. 
 
 Punishment — coniinued 
 
 Of vice, as Tolly, page S9. As mischiev- 
 ous to society, 90, 91. Of vice, as 
 such, 91-94. 
 
 Of virtuous persons, and of virtuous 
 actions, by society explained, 91. 
 
 Why, in the natural course of things, 
 j)unishinent does not always reach 
 the vicious, 98. 
 
 Ascribed, in Scripture, to God's Justice, 
 252. 
 
 Future. See Future Putiishment. 
 
 V can us, instances of, in the daily 
 course of Providence, 267. 
 
 As the method of our redemption ; the 
 objection against, answered, 266-269. 
 
 What is meant by deserving punish- 
 ment, 36S, 369. 
 
 Reason, 
 
 Can, and ought to judge of the nwaning, 
 the evidence, and tiie morality of 
 Scripture, 236, 237. 
 
 Natural tendency of, to prevail over 
 brute force, 99, 100. 
 
 Inability of, to determine for us wheth- 
 er the futiu-e punishment of sin could 
 be prevented, 254, 255. 
 
 Hojtes and fears of, confirmed by rev- 
 elation. 257, 25S. 
 
 A very incompetent judge of the con- 
 duciveness of means to ends, 177. 
 
 Could not have discovered the scheme 
 of Christianity, 203. No j)resumption 
 against the scheme of Christianity on 
 this account, 213. 
 
 An incompetent judge of what was to 
 be expected in revelation, 222, 223. 
 
 Incojjipetent to judge beforehand, how 
 roelatioiis should have been left in 
 the world, 226-228. 
 
 Fouy of objections to Christianity, upon 
 supposed principles of reason, 349. 
 
 Reasoning, 
 
 Upon the principles of others, what it 
 means, 342. 
 
 Abstruse, when necessary in matters 
 of religion, 357. 
 
 Upon the course of nature, without at- 
 tending to known facts, apt to be fal- 
 lacious, 37. 
 
 See Abstract. 
 
 Redemption, 
 
 Scripture doctrine of, stated. 260-265. 
 llluitrated by the analogy of natural 
 
 rttmediei^ 252. 
 Agreeable to our natural notions, our 
 
 holies and our fears, 256-25S. 
 The "manner of its efficacy not made 
 
 known, nor discoverable by reason, 
 
 etc., 265. 
 Eashness of seeking to explain it fer- 
 
 ther than Scripture ha» done, 265. 
 ' See Mediator, Fwni»km$nt, SuerU 
 
 fio* 
 
 Reflection, 
 
 Our present powers of, not likely to 
 be destroyed or suspended by death, 
 pages 60. 61. 
 
 Does not depend upon oui bodily p6vr- 
 ers of sensation, 62. 
 
 May be improved by death, 63. 
 
 Reformation 
 
 Does not always preclude punitliutteEl. 
 
 256. 
 
 Regard 
 
 Due to the Son and Holy Spirit, 202. 
 Due to God as Creator, the essence oi 
 natural religion, i03. 
 
 Relations, 
 
 Of the several species and Individuals 
 in the natural world, impossible for 
 us to say how far they extend, 1 73, 174. 
 
 The revealed relations of the Son and 
 the Holy Spirit to us, 201. 
 
 Duties arising from, strictly moral, 
 202, 203. 
 
 Religion, 
 
 The whole of, consists in action, 288. 
 
 A f)ractical thing, 336. 
 
 Wherein it consists, 836. 
 
 External and internal, 202. 
 
 Essence of natural religion, 202. 
 
 Kevealed, 202. 
 
 Whereinihe general spirit ot, consists, 
 •210. 
 
 The perception ot, what, 839. 
 
 The stress of, where laid by Scripture, 
 209. 
 
 In what view considered by Butler, 340. 
 
 How religion presupposes integrity in 
 those who embrace it, 341. 
 
 If founded in God's moral character, 
 161. 
 
 Implies a future state, 66. 
 
 Would not be proved by even a demon- 
 strative proof of one, why, 66. 
 
 Implies God's government by rewards 
 and punishments, 76. 
 
 Implies God's perfect moral govern- 
 ment, 108. 
 
 Projier proof of, in this view. 109-112. 
 
 Collateral and practical proof, 10S-!'.l'i. 
 
 Teaches our being in a state of pro- 
 bation. 113. 
 
 As a matter of fact, proof of, 161. 
 
 Obligations not destroyed by theopln 
 ion of necessity, 162. 
 
 Proper motives to, 189, 190. 
 
 Affords distinct particular reasons fof 
 miracles. 220. 
 
 Degrees of knowledge of religion dif 
 ferent among dill'erent men, 272-274. 
 
 Why its evidence may have been left 
 doubtful, 2S2-2ST. 
 
 Such doubtfubiess does not destroy its 
 obligaUoD, 27S. 
 
 Its impurtaotd, 189. 
 
Index. 
 
 391 
 
 Religion — continued. 
 
 Impugned on supposed principles of 
 reason, page 84^. 
 
 Origin of. according to history and tra- 
 dition, 165-217. 
 
 General truth of, proved by a dilemma 
 from its state in the first ages of the 
 world, 165. 
 
 State of, in the heathen world, 191. 
 
 Apparently un corrupted in the first 
 ages, 165. 
 
 l/atnral, the system of, what, 42, 43, 
 16.t, 320. 
 
 Not the only object of our regard, 193. 
 
 Has external evidences, 165. 
 
 Whether it could have been reasoned 
 out. 191, 321. 
 
 Taught by Christianity in its purity, 
 194, 195. 
 
 How confirmed by the miracles and 
 prophecies recorded in Scripture. 195. 
 
 How promoted by the settlement of a 
 visii)le Churcli,"l97, 198. 
 
 General proof o^ level to common men, 
 2S7. 
 
 The obligations of, as included b}' Chris- 
 tianity, lie obvious to all apprehen- 
 sions, 854. 
 
 "What it teaches of a future life, and 
 what not, 79, 80 n. 
 
 Of the efficacy of repentance. 2.55. 
 
 The profession and establishment of^ 
 how much owing to Scripture, 320. 
 
 Even in countries not acknowledging 
 the authority of Scripture, 321. 
 
 Proof of, from reason, not destroyed 
 hereby, 321. 
 
 Analogy of, properly used to remove 
 objections to revealed. 334, 335. 
 
 Eevealed, See Eevelution, 
 
 Religious knowledge. 
 
 See Knowledge — Analogy. 
 
 Remedies, 
 
 Some diseases are, 179. 
 
 Analogy between natural, and Chris- 
 tianity, as a remedial provision for 
 us, 235, 236. 
 
 The provision of, an instance of com- 
 passion in the original constitution of 
 the world, 353. 
 
 Repentance, 
 
 Its insufficiency to expiate guilt argued 
 • from analogy, 257. Argued also from 
 
 the cenoral sense of mankind. 257. 
 Its efficacy, whence derived, 264. 
 
 Resignation 
 
 To Gi'd^ will an essential part of vir- 
 tue. 147, 
 
 Afflictions, the proper discipline for, 149. 
 
 Prosperity and imagination m.iy give 
 occasion for, 143. 
 
 kevelation, 
 
 riie particular scheme of the universe 
 eannot be k^iuwo without, 105. 
 
 Revelation — continue 1. 
 
 Would not have been given if the light 
 of nature rendered it superfluoua, 
 pr.ge 191. 
 
 Manifestly not superfluous, 193, 
 
 The great service it renders to natural 
 religion, 194-199. 
 
 Eepublishes and confirms natural ro* 
 ligion in its purity, 194-196. 
 
 Supplies new means for its prcservatiou, 
 ly 7-199. 
 
 If really given, cannot be safely neglect 
 ed, 194. 
 
 Itself, in what sense miraculous, 215. 
 
 At the beginrdng of the world, whether 
 miraculous, 215. 
 
 No presumption from analogy against 
 such a, 215. 
 
 Primitive, how far the belief of pure re- 
 ligion ill the first age of the world 
 favors the notion of one, 165. 
 
 Historical and traditionary evidence of 
 as ancient as histury, 1(5.5, 217. 
 
 The early pretenses of false, probably 
 imply a true one, 165. 
 
 Supposed presumption against, as mi- 
 raculous, considered. Part II, chap. ii. 
 
 We are incompetent judges of what 
 were to be expected in a, Part II, 
 chap. iii. 
 
 What reason can judge of in a revelation, 
 236-238. 
 
 Discovers new relations, and conse- 
 quently imposes new duties, 201-203. 
 
 Probable origin of sacrifices, 264. 
 
 Revealed religion 
 
 (The Christian) a fit subject of analog- 
 ical reasoning, 38. 
 What is implied in the scheme of, 42, 
 
 43, 204, 2U5. 212, 241, 242. 
 May be considered as whollv historical, 
 
 315. 
 Summary of. under that view, 315-317. 
 Internal, as distinguished from natural, 
 
 wherein the essence of, consists, 193. 
 No presumption against its general 
 
 scheme from the analogy of nature, 
 
 212. 
 A particular scheme under the general 
 
 plan of Providence. 241. 
 Consists of various j>arts, and is carried 
 
 on through a length of time, 241. 
 Supposes mankind in a state of degri^ 
 
 dalit)n, 2:J4, 250. 259. 
 The help of tlie Holy Spirit necessary 
 
 to renew our nature, 2o5. 
 Kepentance n.aturally ijisufficient to 
 
 present ah the bad consequences of 
 
 sin, 204, 205, 257-2.)9. 
 Its dispensation, whether carried on by 
 
 general laws, 243. 244. 
 Mav ai)pe.ar natural to some beings, 65. 
 Evidence of. See Incidence. 
 Objections to. See O/ijecti-ms. 
 Analogy, of, to natural, and the con- 
 stitution and coiuso of nature. See 
 
 Anulo'jy. 
 
392 
 
 Index. 
 
 Rewards and punishments, 
 
 According to the natural constitution of 
 
 things, correspond to virtue and vice, 
 
 page 98. 
 Tlumgh not equally distributed now, 
 
 yet. in all probability, will be hereafter, 
 
 102. 
 Hope of reward, a legitimate motive to 
 
 obedience, 147. 
 See 1' nnvihment. 
 
 Ridicule, 
 
 How, obstructs men's seeing the evi- 
 dence of religion, iJS5. 
 
 Though applied to show the argument 
 frini analogy in a disadvantageous 
 light, yet cannot invalidate it, 75, 346. 
 
 Roman Empire, 
 
 Plainly, was divided into about ten 
 
 parts, 312. 
 Bearing of thnt circumstance on the 
 
 prophecy of Daniel, 312. 
 
 Rome, Babylon, and Greece, 
 How noticed in prophecy, 816. 
 
 Sacrifices, 
 
 Propitiatory, what the general preva- 
 lence of, shows us, 257. 
 
 How they originated among the Jews, 
 and oilier ancient nations, 264. 
 
 The death of Christ a proper sacrifice, 
 260-262. 
 
 Its efficacy, 264. 
 
 Manner of its efficacy not explained, 265. 
 
 Objections against it on this ground 
 highly absurd, 265, 266. 
 
 Bee Mediator. 
 
 Skepticism 
 
 Will not justify a presumptuous fear- 
 lessness with regard to what may be 
 hereafter. S2. 
 
 Implies a general state of probation, in 
 the moral and religious sense, 278, 279. 
 
 The immnraiity and irreligion of skep- 
 tics utterly ine.\cusable. 318. 
 
 How far toward speculative infidelity 
 a skf'ptic can go, who has had true 
 Christianity, with its proi)er evidence 
 laid before him, and has considered 
 them, 355. 
 
 See Doubting. 
 
 Scorn 
 
 Of religion, to what owing, 348-356. 
 Great weakness to be influenced by it, 
 
 813. 
 Parts of the prophetical writings, why 
 
 treated with. 2-.'3. 
 
 Bcriptiire 
 
 Considered in an historical view, 815. 
 How dlstiiigirished, by its design, from 
 
 all other books, 315. • 
 Why it begins with an account of the 
 
 fivation of tho world, 815, 316. 
 
 Scripture, — continued. 
 
 In what view, contains an abridgment 
 of the history of the world, page 316. 
 
 With what its notices termuiate, 3i6, 
 317. 
 
 Considering the variety and extent of 
 its matter, its not being confuted fr»m 
 reason, history, or internal inconsist- 
 ency, is a strong presumption of ita 
 truth, 317. 
 
 Summary of its contents, 318-320. 
 
 Antiquity of its first part, 821. 
 
 Its chronology confirmed by the nator&l 
 and civil history of the world, 821. 
 
 Its common history as much confirmed 
 as we could expect by profane history, 
 322. 
 
 Has internal appearance of credibility, 
 322, 32.3. 
 
 No more appearances of strangeness, or 
 mistakes of transcribers in Scrij)ture, 
 than in other writings of hko antiu- 
 uity. 323. 
 
 Credibihty of the common history of 
 Scripture, how it gives credibihty to 
 the miraculous, 293, 324. 
 
 Not always to be interpreted on the 
 same rules as a common book, why? 
 211, 310, 311. 
 
 Its relations of miracles not easily ac- 
 counted for on the supposition of 
 their falsehood, 293, 294. 
 
 The truth of them, the obvious and di- 
 rect account ot their composition and 
 reception, 294. 
 
 The profession and establishment of nat- 
 ural religion, how far owing to, 320. 
 
 Some precepts of, matters of oflPense, 
 why? 237. 
 
 The province of reason to judge of its 
 morality and evidence, 23ft-23S. 
 
 May contain things not yet discovered, 
 233. 
 
 Tho oi-dinary means of discovering its 
 meaning, 2.33. 
 
 The duty of searching, 211. 
 
 When we may determine the seeming 
 meaning, not the true one, 202. 
 
 Its authority, the only question con- 
 cerning, 227. 
 
 See Analogy — HtHtory — Inspiration 
 — St. PanPs Epistles — Prophecy — 
 Rtvelation. 
 
 Self, 
 Invisible, 50. Its sameness does ne 
 depend on the sameness of tho bty'r, 
 52, 53. 
 
 Self-denial, 
 
 The fact that it is necessary for onr 
 present happiness, makes it credible 
 that it may be likewise necessary for 
 our future, 115, 116, 120-122. 
 Necessity of. argued from the nature of 
 • particular affections,- 139, - 
 Productive of resignation to Ood's will, 
 147. 
 
Index. 
 
 393 
 
 Sell-love, 
 
 Reasonable, Is coinjidcHt with Tirtue, 
 page 1157 n. 
 
 Is daily aeen to be overmatched by pas- 
 sion, 116, 137 n. 
 
 No cause for its being disclaimed by 
 moralists as a motive, 13S n. 
 
 Has need to be approved and disciplined, 
 181 n, 1*8. 
 
 Shaftesbury, Lord, 
 
 His writings referred to, 87. 
 
 Simplicity, 
 
 Of a liviDg agent, argument to prove, 
 fl. 
 
 Sin, 
 Why not kept out of the world, 179. 
 
 Son of God 
 
 The gift of the, to tho world, 268. 
 
 Sorrow 
 
 Cannot of itself restore abused benefits, 
 255. 
 Soul, 
 A simple sabstance, 51. 
 Not destroyed with the body, 48. 
 Not naturally immortal, 60. 
 Brutes, souls of, 5S. 
 
 Speaking with tongues, 231. 
 
 Special interpositions of Providence, 179, 
 180. 
 
 Speculative difficulties similar to external 
 temptations, 2S2. 
 The chief trial of some, 284-286. 
 
 Spread of Christianity unaccountable if 
 it were an imposture, 325. 
 
 Stages of existence, 46. 
 
 Standing ministry, what for, 197. 
 
 State of probation, chap. iv. 
 
 State of discipline and improvement, 
 chap. T. 
 
 Strangeness of some Scripture events, 823. 
 
 Stupidity of tho martyrs, if insincere, 299. 
 
 Submissive temper necessary, 149. 
 
 Sub'>rdination8 exceedingly beneficial, 182. 
 
 Subserviences in nature, 174. 
 
 Subserviences, the world a system of, 247. 
 
 Success, temporal, always uncertain, 840. 
 
 Sufferings may be avoided, 70. 
 Not necessary to the cultivation of vir- 
 tue, 118. 
 
 Sufferings of Christ vindicate God's law, 
 page '.^67. 
 
 Sufferings of the early Christians, 299. 
 
 Sufficiency of light of naturo pretended, 
 191. 
 
 Summary of JeAvish history, 318. 
 
 Of the historical evidence of Scripture, 
 32S. 
 
 Supernatural instructions necessary fixm 
 
 the fii-st, 2ia 
 
 Temptations, 
 
 Implied in tho idea of a state of proha 
 tion. 114. 
 
 Sources of our, 115-117. 
 
 Those of our temporal and of our r* 
 ligious trial compared, 115-122. 
 
 A means of disciplining the moral prin- 
 ciple, 143, 144. 
 
 Virtuous iiabits the proper security 
 against, 136, 137. 
 
 The sup[)osition of them lessens, in cer- 
 tain cases, the perception of ill -desert, 
 369. 
 
 Tendency, 
 
 Ambiguity of the word. Ill n. 
 Tendencies of virtue will probably here- 
 after become effect. 111. 
 
 Testimony, 
 
 When only it can be destroyed, 806. 
 See Evidence^ Evidence oj Christian' 
 tty. 
 
 Trial, 
 
 Our, in our temporal, compared with 
 tliat In our reUgious capacity, 115- 
 118. 
 
 Proceeds in both from the same causes, 
 and has the same effect upon behav- 
 ior, 111, lis. 
 
 Difficulties of, increased by misbehav- 
 ior of others, 118. Also by our own 
 errors and follies, 119. 
 
 Equitableness of our iiresent state of, 
 vindicated, US, 119. 
 
 Not possible for us to understand all the 
 reasons of our being placed in, 124. 
 
 End of, our improvement in virtue and 
 piety, aa a qualification for a future 
 state. 125. 
 
 May also be intended for tho manifes- 
 tation of our characters to the rest 
 of the creation, 151. 
 
 The present state of the evidence of 
 religion may be part of some m< n's 
 trial, 276-2S7. And perhaps the chief 
 part, 284, 2S5. 
 
 Difficulties of belief afford a trial anal- 
 ogous to external temptations, 28ft- 
 285. 
 
 Suffering, ignorance does not prevent It __.. 
 either in temporal or spiritual things, I Ultimate 
 20i. I Design of man. 74 a. 
 
394 
 
 Index. 
 
 Understanding, l 
 
 Our probation witb reqrard to the exer- 
 cise of the, i)ages 277, 27S. 
 May be perverted, 1(56. 
 
 Jueasiness produced by former sins, 88. 
 
 Union of good beings, 10-L 
 
 Universality, 
 
 Objections to Christianity from the 
 want of, considered, 271-291. 
 
 L'niverse and its government immense, 
 105. 
 
 ITnju-tifiableness of religious indiffer- 
 ence, aS. 
 
 Uprigiit creatures may fall, 1G9. 
 Need good habits, 140. 
 
 Vegetables, 
 
 The destruction of, not analogous to 
 the death of living agents, «>4. 
 
 Wiiat is meant by their identity, 359, 
 360. 
 
 Veracity, 
 
 Our natural regai-d to it, 378. When 
 violated, 375. 
 
 Vice, 
 
 What it chiefly consists in, 368. 
 
 Does not consist merely in the inten- 
 tion to produce un happiness, 372. 
 
 Whether folly be a species of it, 369- 
 372. 
 
 Manner in which the habit of it is 
 formed, 139, 140. 
 
 This life is to some j)ractically a disci- 
 pline in, 145. 
 
 Punished as imprurient 89. As hurt- 
 ful, 90. As vice, 92-97. 
 
 Whether ever rewarded as such, 92-9S. 
 
 How the a|)pearance of it is brought 
 about, 98. 
 
 The pleasures of it scarce worth tak- 
 ing into account, 1S9. 
 
 Passion a sorry excuse for it, 189. 
 
 Natural bad consequences of, to be es- 
 teemed judicial punishments inflicted 
 by God, 204, 
 
 Private, may be public benefits, and yet 
 upon the whole it were more bene- 
 fit, d that men would refrain from 
 them, 179. 
 
 Hinderances of its complete punish- 
 ment (iccidental. 99-109. 
 
 Must be the misery of every creature, 
 41. 
 
 Considerations showing its enormity, 
 253. 
 
 Vicious 
 
 Actions never rewarded by 80«Iety be- 
 
 cdzise they are vicjdous, 91. 
 Persons, prosperity of, rec9nQU«4 ^^ 
 
 moral goveromdat, 98l 
 
 Viciousnesa 
 Of the world fits it for a stat* of tria 
 to good men, page 146. 
 
 Virtue, 
 
 Possibility of exceptions to the happl 
 ness of, 88. 
 
 Social advantages of, a proof of an e* 
 tablished moral government, 94. 
 
 Conditions necessary to its complotp 
 triumph over vice, 100, 101. 
 
 Its natural tendencies hindered in out 
 present state, 103. May be more ad- 
 vantageously situated hereafter, 104. 
 
 A bond of union among all endured 
 with it, 104. 
 
 Happy effects of, set forth in the in- 
 stance of a perfectly virtuous king- 
 dom. 105, 106. 
 
 Habit of, not formed by merely think- 
 ing and talking of virtue, 128. 
 
 And ])iely a necessary qualification 
 for a future stae, 135. Our capa- 
 city of improvement therein, by 
 moral and religious habits, 135. Ne- 
 cessity of improvement argued, 136- 
 142. 
 
 Habit of, the security against the undue 
 operation of particular affections, 187- 
 141. 
 
 There is a universally acknowledged 
 standard of, 367. 
 
 Coi+esiKnids to our notion of good de- 
 sert, 36S. 
 
 Common instances of, do not raise a 
 strong perception of good desert, and 
 why, 369. 
 
 Prudence a part of, 371, 372. 
 
 Does not consist entirely in benevo- 
 lence, 372, 373. 
 
 Virtuous 
 
 Actions never punished by society &e- 
 
 cdtcae they are virtuous, 91. 
 Persons, afflictions of, how reconciled 
 
 with moral government, 9S. 
 Beings need virtuous habits, 142. 
 Habits a security, 138. How formed, 
 
 123. Improve virtue, 138. Neces« 
 
 sary in a future state, 135. 
 
 Virtue and Vice 
 
 Are, in the natural course of things, re- 
 warded and punished, as (tuch, 91 
 
 As qualities of actions, effects of, on 
 men's minds, 92, 94, 96. 
 
 Tendency of, to produce their effects 
 in a greater degree than they do at 
 present, 99-108. 
 
 Overbalance of happiness or misery no 
 the standard of, 373, 374. 
 
 Voice of nature is for virtue^ W. 
 
 Warburton, Bishop, 
 Quoted, 9X n, 282 n. 
 
 Wast« of s«ods, lid. 
 
Index. 
 
 395 
 
 Waterland, Dr., 
 Quoted, page 202 n. 
 
 Whately, ArchMshop, 
 Quoted, 217 n. 
 
 Wickedness, 
 
 May prfHliice some benefits, 179. 
 Voluntary, 124. 
 
 Will and Character, 
 
 Explained. 160 n. 
 
 May be affirmed of the Author of Na- 
 ture, notwithstanding the scheme of 
 BeoeMity, 160. 
 
 World, 
 
 The present fit to be a state of disci- 
 pline for moral Imnrovement, pages 
 142-145. 
 
 A theater for the manifestation of per- 
 sons' characters, 150. 
 
 Natural, intended to be subordinate to 
 the moral, 174. 
 
 History of, how viewed in Scripture 
 815. 
 
 Governed by fi.xed lava, 90. 
 
 Wickedness of, 259. 
 
 Yonth. 
 
 The great importance of right dir«i> 
 
 tion in, 78, 182, 138. 
 It! beneficial subordinatifiu, 18S. 
 
f 
 
Date Due 
 
 
 
 
 1 
 
 
 
 
 
 ■ 1.. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 im 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 m 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 ' 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 f) 
 
 
 
 
»■ v 
 
 U