I -) -- ■ ■ BR 45 .H36 v. 15 Candlish, James Stuart, 1835 -1897. The work of the Holy Spirit IDantihoofcs for Bible Classes antr Situate ^tuUents. EDITED BY REV. MARCUS DODS, D.D,, AND REV. ALEXANDER WHYTE, D. D. .*-*<^>4-*. NOW READY. THE EPISTLE TO THE GALATIANS. By James Macgregor, D.D., late of New College, Edinburgh. Price is. 6d. THE POST-EXILIAN PROPHETS. With Introductions and Notes. By Rev. Marcus Dods, D.D., Glasgow. Price 2s. A LIFE OF CHRIST. By Rev. James Stalker, M.A. Price is. 6d. THE SACRAMENTS. By Rev. Professor Candlish, D.D. Price is. 6d. . THE BOOKS OF CHRONICLES. By Rev. Professor Murphy, LL.D., Belfast. Price is. 6d. THE CONFESSION OF FAITH. By Rev. John Macpherson, M.A., Findhorn. Price 2s. THE BOOK OF JUDGES. By Rev. Principal Douglas, D.D. Price is. 3d. THE BOOK OF JOSHUA. By Rev. Principal Douglas, D.D. Price is. dd. THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. By Rev. Professor Davidson, D.D., Edinburgh. Price is. 6d. SCOTTISH CHURCH HISTORY. By Rev. N. L. Walker. Price is. 6d. THE CHURCH. By Rev. Prof. Binnie, D.D., Aberdeen. Price is. 6d. THE REFORMATION. By Rev. Professor Lindsay, D.D. Price 2s. THE BOOK OF GENESIS. By Rev. Marcus Dods, D.D. Price 2s. THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. By Rev. Principal Brown, D.D., Aberdeen. Price 2s. PRESBYTERIANISM. By Rev. John Macpherson, M.A. Price is. 6d. LESSONS ON THE LIFE OF CHRIST. By Rev. Wm. Scrymgeour, Glasgow. Price 2s. 6d. THE SHORTER CATECHISM. By Rev. Alexander Whyte, D.D., Edinburgh. Price 2s. 6d. [ Continued on next page. HANDBOOKS FOR BIBLE CLASSES. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MARK. By Rev. Professor Lindsay, D.D., Glasgow. Price 2s. 6d. A SHORT HISTORY OF CHRISTIAN MISSIONS. By George Smith, LL. D. , F. R. G. S. Price 2s.6d. A LIFE OF ST. PAUL. By Rev. James Stalker, M.A. Price is. 6d. PALESTINE. With Maps. By Rev. Arch. Henderson, M.A., Crieff. Price 2s. 6d. THE BOOK OF ACTS. By Rev. Professor Lindsay, D.D. Part L, Chaps, i. to xii. Price is. 6d. — Part II., Chaps, xiii. to end. Price is. 6d. THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. By Rev. Professor Candlish, D.D. Price is. 6d. IN PREPARATION. THE SUM OF SAVING KNOWLEDGE. By Rev. John Macpherson, M.A., Findhorn. [In the Press, THE SABBATH. By Rev. Professor S almond, D.D., Aberdeen. THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. JOHN. By Rev. George Reith, M.A., Glasgow. [Shortly. THE FIRST EPISTLE TO THE CORINTHIANS. By Rev. Marcus Dods, D.D., Glasgow. THE EPISTLE TO THE PHILIPPIANS. By Rev. James Mellis, M.A., Southport. THE EPISTLE TO THE COLOSSIANS. By Rev. Simeon R. Macphail, M.A., Liverpool. CHURCH AND STATE. By A. Taylor Innes, Esq., Advocate, Edin. burgh. CHRISTIAN ETHICS. By Rev. Professor Lindsay, D.D., Glasgow. APOLOGETICS. By Rev. James Iverach, M.A., Aberdeen. THE BOOK OF EXODUS. By James Macgregor, D.D., late of New College, Edinburgh. THE DOCTRINE OF SIN. By Rev. Professor Candlish, D.D. ISAIAH. By Rev. Professor Emslie M. A., London. HANDBOOKS FOR BIBLE CLASSES AND PRIVATE STUDENTS. EDITED BY REV. MARCUS DODS, D.D., AND REV. ALEXANDER WHYTE, D.D. CANDLISH ON THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. EDINBURGH: T. & T. CLARK, 38 GEORGE STREET. PRINTED BY MORRISON AND GIBB, FOR T. & T. CLARK, EDINBURGH. LONDON, HAMILTON, ADAMS, AND CO. DUBLIN, ..... GEORGE HERBERT. KEW YORK, .... SCRIBNER AND VVELFORD. THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. BY JAMES S. "CANDLISH, D.D., PROFESSOR OF SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY IN THE FREE CHURCH COLLEGE, GLASGOW EDINBURGH: T. & T. CLARK, 38 GEORGE STREET. CONTENTS. PART I. THE HOLY SPIRIT. PAGE Chapter I. The Spirit of God in the Old Testament, . , .11 ,, II. The Spirit of God in the New Testament, . . 21 ,, III. The Spirit of God in the Creeds of the Church, . 29 TART II. THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. Chapter I. The Work of the Holy Spirit on Christ, . II. The Sending of the Holy Spirit by Christ, , III. The Work of the Spirit in the External Call of th Word, IV. The Work of the Spirit in Conviction, . V. The Work of the Spirit in Conversion, VI. The Work of the Spirit uniting us to Christ, VII. The Work of the Spirit in Sanctification, . VIII. The Work of the Spirit as a Witness and Teacher, IX. The Work of the Spirit as our Helper in Prayer, X. The Comforting Work of the Holy Spirit, • 37 43 49 58 67 85 89 97 106 in INTRODUCTORY. The work of the Holy Spirit of God in our salvation from sin is known to us only through the Christian revelation recorded in Scripture. The blessed and beneficent effects of it are indeed to be traced in the great improvement and elevation of the moral state of mankind under the influence of Christianity, and these afford evidence of a strictly historical nature that Christianity is indeed of divine origin. But we could not from these effects alone ascertain with any degree of minuteness the nature and working of the divine agency by which they are produced. Such information, however, is given us in the inspired records, espe- cially ci the New Testament, from which we learn what Jesus and His apostles taught as to the way in which the hearts and lives of men are renewed and purified, as well as how they are reconciled to God. Our inquiry therefore into this subject is to be prose- cuted in the first place and chiefly by the study of the Bible, although we may expect to find the conclusions to which that leads us confirmed by the experience through which we pass if we obey the practical precepts and directions of the gospel. The salvation that Christianity brings to sinners is represented in Scripture as consisting of two principal parts — deliverance from guilt, condemnation, and wrath, which is ascribed directly to the work of the Lord Jesus Christ for us ; and deliverance from the 9 10 INTRODUCTORY. love and habit and power of sin in ourselves, which is represented as especially the work of the Paraclete, the Holy Spirit, whom Jesus said His Father would send in His name. It is the latter of these that is the subject of this treatise ; and in order to ascertain in a methodical way the teaching of Scripture on it, it will be suitable to consider it under two general heads — the Holy Spirit Himself, and the work that He does in our salvation. These accordingly will be the two principal parts of this hand- book. PART I. THE HOLY SPIRIT. CHAPTER 1. THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. The name "spirit of God" is one that occurs very often in the Bible from its first page to its last, and in many different con- nections, so that it is not always easy to determine what is meant by it. The words in the original languages rendered " spirit " in English mean primarily "wind" or "breath;" and like similar words in most languages, are used in a figurative sense to denote the soul or mind of man. The breath that is in his nostrils, that never ceases to respire as long as there is life in the body, and that forms in articulate sounds the expression of his thoughts and feelings, is taken to represent the life itself or the thinking self-conscious " I," that he feels himself to be. In like manner, the phrase " spirit of God" is sometimes used for the life that is in God, or God himself as a spiritual being. In Ps. cxxxix. 7, "Whither shall I go from thy spirit?" is parallel to "Whither shall I flee from thy presence?" and the next verse, "If I ascend up into heaven, thou art there," shows that God's spirit here means the same as God Himself. In Isa. xl. 13, "the spirit of the Lord " is also parallel to " him," and is rendered by Paul (1 Cor. ii. 16) " the mind of the Lord." It has the same meaning in 11 12 THE HOLY SPIRIT. Zech. vi. 8; and the similar word "soul" is used of God in Isa. xlii. i, Matt. xii. 18. But much more frequently the phrase Spirit of God is used after a more literal analogy, and denotes a power or influence coming forth from God, as the breath comes out of the mouth of man. As the thunder is called in Biblical poetry the voice of the Lord (Ps. xviii. 13, xxiw 3-9), so tLz stormy wind is some- times called the breath of God, " the blast of the breath of his nostrils" (Ex. xv. 8 ; Ps. xviii. 15 ; Job iv. c, ; Isa. xxx. 33 ; and in the New Testament, 2 Thess. ii. 8) ; and the notion of the breath of God is also connected with the milder and beneficent agencies of the wind in nature, as in Ps. civ. 30, where the renewal of the face of the earth, and the reproduction of living things, are ascribed to the spirit or breath of God. So in the narrative of the Creation, at the very outset it is said, "the spirit of God moved on the face of the waters" (Gen. i. 2). This may be taken in close connection with what follows : " And God said, Let there be light : and there was light" (v. 3) ; the spirit being, as it were, the breath of God that forms His word of creative power. So it seems to be meant in Ps. xxxiii. 6, " By the word of the Lord were the heavens made ; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth." Again, in Job xxvi. 13, it is said in reference to creation, "By his spirit the heavens are furnished;" where it is not so much the idea of breath, as that of wisdom, that seems to be meant. More particularly the breath of life in man is said to have been breathed into his nostrils by God (Gen. ii. 7) ; and this is especially applied to the intellectual life of man, Job xxxii. 8, "there is a spirit in man, and the breath of the Almighty giveth them understanding ; " xxxiii. 4, " The spirit of God hath made me, and the breath of the Almighty giveth me life." So it is said, by a somewhat different figure, " the spirit of man is the lamp of the Lord, searching all the innermost parts of the belly " (Prov. xx. 27), where reference seems to be made to what we call the voice of conscience. Compare Rom. ii. 14, 15. The same thing THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. 1 3 may also be meant in Gen. vi. 3: ''The Lord said, My spirit shall not strive with (or rule in) man for ever, for that he also is flesh : yet shall his days be an hundred and twenty years." The only previous reference to the spirit of God in man was in Gen. ii. 7, where it is described as the source of his life. The meaning, however, cannot be that individual men should not live for ever ; for that had been made abundantly plain before : it must refer to the race as a whole, and declare that after a respite of 120 years it should be swept away; as it was by the flood. If the rendering " strive " be correct, the passage would imply that man's God- given soul is a moral witness against sin, as we see in the nar- ratives of the remorse of Adam and Cain (Gen. iii. 7-10, iv. 14, 15) : if the translation should be " rule, or abide, in man," then it would simply denote the presence and power of that spirit of life that God breathed into man at the first. However this may be, it seems clear that the godly Israelites recognised the voice of God in the teachings of their own consciences. Of this we have a striking illustration in Ps. xvi. 7 : — " I will bless the Lord, who hath given me counsel; Yea, my reins instruct me in the night seasons." The same thing is described in the two parallel clauses, first from the side of God and then from that of man. It is the Lord's counsel that has moved the Psalmist to choose Him as his portion ; but it has come to him by the voice of his own reins or heart. In like manner, an evil conscience was regarded as of God, and the evil spirit that troubled Saul after his sin and rejection by God is called " an evil spirit from the Lord " (1 Sam. xvi. 14), " an evil spirit of God, of the Lord" (i Sam. xviii. 10, xix. 9); and even absolutely "a spirit of God" (1 Sam. xvi. 23). These phrases can hardly mean a wicked spirit possessing the unfaithful king, like the demoniacs of whom we read in the New Testament : they rather denote his own guilty conscience stirred up by divine influence to accuse and torment him. But besides these general uses of the name spirit or breath of 14 THE HOLY SPIRIT. God, for the working of His power and wisdom in the world of nature and in the soul of man, we find it employed in a peculiarly- distinctive sense in the region of God's special covenant relations with Israel as His people. There it appears as a gift bestowed upon selected persons, giving them power and capacity for various functions in the service of God and of His people. It is said of Abraham, that he was a prophet (Gen. xx. 7), which according to the explanations given later would imply the possession of the spirit of God, though in the narrative in Genesis it was only said before that the word of the Lord came to Abraham (Gen. xvi. 1), and that the Lord appeared to him (Gen. xvii. 1, xviii. 1). Pharaoh is represented as calling Joseph " a man in whom the spirit of God is/' forasmuch as God had showed him what was to come, and he was discreet and wise (Gen. xli. 38, 39). Then Moses is described as having the spirit of God upon him, though this is said only incidentally (Num. xi. 17, 25), and no express account is given of the bestowal of the spirit upon him, except that when he was called to be the deliverer of Israel God said, " I will be with thy mouth and teach thee what thou shalt speak " (Ex. iv. 12); and it is implied through all the narrative of his work that he was taught and guided by God. Bezaleel, the chief artificer of the tabernacle in the wilderness, is said to have been filled with the spirit of God in all wisdom for his work (Ex. xxxi. 3) ; and when the work of Moses in governing the people was to be shared with seventy of the elders, we read that God took of the spirit that was upon him, and gave it unto them (Num. xi. 17, 25). From the context of these passages we may see, that while the spirit of God is spoken of in them, not as being in all men, as in the texts formerly adduced, but as a special gift to particular persons ; still this gift is closely con- nected, on the one hand with what we should call natural endowments, and on the other hand with the presence of God Himself. The spirit, in these cases, is something more specific and individual than the rational soul or conscience common to all men, but it is not entirely separate from that, but simply high THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. 1 5 and special powers of intellect or moral sense, wisdom, unselfish- ness, godliness. These qualities, too, are not merely regarded as gifts of God in general, but the insight, guidance, and power that they give, are viewed as really the teaching and help of God Himself. As man's intellectual nature in general is represented as due to God's having breathed into him the breath of life ; so special powers of mind or soul are considered to be due to a special communion with God on the part of those who have them. In the days of the Judges, the spirit of the Lord is spoken of in connection with deeds of courage and prowess, and even of physical strength, as it is said to have come on Othniel (Judg. iii. 10), Gideon (vi. 34), Jephthah (xi. 29), and Samson (xiii. 25, xiv. 6, 19, xv. 14). In these cases there is no direct reference to moral qualities ; but it is to be observed that they were all men who believed in Jehovah, and were fighting for His cause and His people. In many cases the special token and proof of the presence and working of the spirit of God was prophecy ; and so in Hos. ix. 7, "the prophet" is used as a parallel to " the man that hath the spirit ;" and in Joel ii. 28, when God promises to pour out His spirit on all flesh, the effect is to be, "your sons and your daughters shall prophesy," etc. But it would seem that in early times the notion of prophecy in Israel was similar to that entertained in other ancient nations, unpremeditated utter- ance of lofty, vehement, or mysterious language, often in a state of trance or ecstasy approaching that of madness. As in such utterances the deliberative judgment is not in exercise, they seemed more directly due to a divine impulse, and so were ascribed to the Spirit of God, whatever was their moral character and tendency, and without being regarded as conveying a message from God that ought to be observed and obeyed. It is only by some such idea as this that we can understand how Joshua could propose to forbid Eldad and Medad prophesying in the camp (Num. xi. 28). So, too, Saul is represented as pro- phesying, when under the power of the evil spirit of God, he tried l6 THE HOLY SPIRIT. to smite David with his javelin (i Sam. xviii. 10, n), as well as when the spirit of God that was on the prophets came upon him (i Sam. xix. 23. 24). This is probably the explanation of the strange pictorial vision of Micaiah (1 Kings xxii. 19-23), in which the spirit of prophecy is personified. The lying spirit is not an evil spirit in the New Testament sense ; neither can it be absolutely identified with the Divine Spirit ; it is rather a personi- fication of the prophetic afflatus, the impulse to rapt enthusiastic utterance, considered as a gift of God, in itself neither morally good nor evil, but becoming evil in the mouths of evil men bent on flattering the king. The breath of the Almighty gave them the power of fervent impassioned language, and thus enabled them to persuade Ahab to his destruction. Such seems to be, expressed in modern language, the substantial meaning of that remarkable vision : and it rests on the general conception of the spirit of God as the author of all mental powers and manifes- tations, and more especially of those in which human delibera- tion falls into the background. The constraining power of the spiritual impulse to prophecy appears in the case of Elihu (Job xxxii. 18-20), and Jeremiah (xx. 9), as also in Ps. xlv. 1. As God's training of His people advanced from stage to stage, He taught them, that the true test of prophecy as His word to them is not the enthusiastic and unusual mode of its utterance, but its moral power over the hearts and lives of the hearers (Jer. xxiii. 22-29) '■> an d its fulfilment in the course of Providence (Deut. xvii. 21, 22). When this came to be known, there are no longer such ascriptions of evil powers and influences to the spirit of God as in earlier days. 1 The divine agency continues indeed to be recognised in the downward career that sinners are ever prone to run : but this is expressed in the way of God leaving them to themselves and to the natural consequences of their own 1 The latest instance that approaches this is in Acts xxi. 4, where the advice not to go up to Jerusalem is said to have been given to Paul " through the Spirit," but disregarded by him, unquestionably in accordance with the will of God. THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. I 7 sin (Ps. Ixxviii. 29-31, lxxxi. 12 ; Ezek. xx. 25, 26; Hos. iv. 17 ; and most distinctly Rom. i. 24-32). In the later portions of the Old Testament we also find the spirit of God more and more associated with moral qualities. The epithet holy is given to the spirit of God in Ps. li. 11, where the psalmist is penetrated with a penitent sense of sin, and in Isa. Ixiii. 10, 11, where reference is made to the history of the Exodus and wilderness journey. When the prophet says, " they grieved his holy spirit," that phrase may simply refer to God Himself as the Holy One ; but when he says, " He put his holy spirit in the midst of them," it must mean the spirit given to Moses and the elders, here more especially described as holy. Similarly in Neh. ix. 20, in reference to the same histor)', it is said, " Thou gavest also thy good spirit to instruct them ; " and from the context it is plain that moral goodness must be meant : and in another of the penitential psalms (cxliii. 10), God's spirit is also called good in the same sense. It is clear, therefore, that latterly at least the spirit of God was recognised as the source not only of power, and wisdom, and prophecy, but of moral goodness as well ; and that this aspect of it becomes gradually the most prominent. There are many places in which the spirit of God, though not expressly called holy, is described as giving the fear of the Lord (Isa. xi. 2-5), judgment and righteousness (Isa. xxxii. 15-17), devotion to the Lord (Isa. xliv. 3-5), hearty obedience (Ezek. xxxvi. 26, 27), penitence and prayer (Zech. xii. 10). But the general bestowal of the spirit as the source of holiness is spoken of as a thing of the future, one of the blessings of the promised reign of God over His people. In the theocracy in Israel, the spirit of God had been given to certain chosen men as leaders and rulers of the nation, and doubtless wherever there was genuine godliness, that was due to the working of the spirit ; but there is no indication that the mass of the nation, though the professed people of God, was filled with the spirit, in the sense in which the Christian Church after the Pentecostal gift was so. What distinguished the chosen people as a nation from others, 1 8 THE HOLY SPIRIT. was the possession of the revelation and law of God. " He showeth his word unto Jacob, his statutes and his judgments unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation, and as for his judgments, they have not known them'"' (Ps. cxlvii. 19, 20). This was done through Moses and the prophets : but the higher blessing of being all directly taught of God, having His law written in their hearts, and His spirit poured out upon them all, was longed for by Moses (Num. xi. 29), and foretold by the prophets as one of the good things of the latter days, to be bestowed in connection with the Messianic salvation (Isa. liv. 13; Jer. xxxi. 33, 34 ; Joel ii. 28, 29). It came to be perceived more and more in the course of Israel's history, that the want of this was the great obstacle to the reformation and restoration of the nation as the people of God. The prophets gave solemn and awful warnings, which generally made an impression at the time, and when aided by the kings and civil authorities, produced an outward reformation in the order and conduct of the state : but new forms of evil were ever coming up, as old ones were ban- ished : formalism and hypocrisy took the place of idolatry and debauchery ; and the prophets after the exile, though they had not to denounce the same sins that their predecessors rebuked, still must address the people as ungodly and backsliding, and look forward to some more effective cure for their corruption in the time to come. Such a cure was to be found only in the outpouring of the spirit of God on the people, to change their hearts and turn them to the Lord. Jeremiah foretells that there is to be a new covenant, in which the law shall be written in the people's hearts, and they shall not be dependent on the teaching of others, but all shall know the Lord (Jer. xxxi. 31-34). Ezekiel speaks of the same blessing, and connects it expressly with the spirit of God (Ezek. xxxvi. 25-27). In Isaiah, and especially in the later prophecies in that book, we find these promises connected with the coming of the Son of David, the Lord's servant, who is anointed with His spirit (Isa. xi., xii., 1\\, lxi.) ; and in Zcchariah and Malachi there are similar representations. THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE OLD TESTAMENT. 1 9 It was in the line and in the spirit of these prophecies, that after a long term of silence in the divine oracles, John the son of the priest Zacharias came from the wilderness where he had dwelt alone with God, calling Israel to repentance, and baptizing in Jordan those who complied with his call. What he demanded was not mere sorrow for past sin, or outward reformation of conduct, but a change of mind, for that is the real meaning of the word rendered "repentance" in English. It is the same change that is spoken of in the Old Testament as circumcising the heart (Jer. iv. 4), making a new heart and a new spirit (Ezek. xviii. 35). John called for this from all, even from the Pharisees and the Sadducees, the most religious and influential of the people ; and he symbolized their cleansing from sin, by plunging them in the water of Jordan to rise out of it again as it were new men. This was to be the preparation for the kingdom or reign of God, which the old prophets had foretold as future, and which he now announced as at hand. At the same time he declared that he was not the Messiah, that he only baptized with water, but that One greater than he was coming after him, who should baptize with the Holy Spirit, that is to say, who should fulfil these old prophecies, and really give the spirit of God as a renewing and sanctifying influence to the mass of men. In all these Old Testament representations, it is to be observed, the spirit of God is regarded not merely as a gift bestowed by God yet separate from Himself, but, according to the original meaning of the phrase, as the very breath of God, so that it is God Himself who is with men and teaches them inwardly, when His Spirit is bestowed on them. The same things are said to be done sometimes by God and sometimes by the spirit of God. For God to write His law in the heart of His people (Jcr. xxxi. 33), is the same as to put His spirit within them (Ezek. xxvi. 27) ; and in another place it is said, " The LORD of hosts shall be ... for a spirit of judgment to him that sitteth in judgment " (Isa. xxviii. 5, 6). So also in the last words of David we read, " The spirit of the Lord spake by me, and his word 20 THE HOLY SPIRIT. was upon my tongue. The God of Israel said, The Rock of Israel spake to me " (2 Sam. xxiii. 2, 3). Thus the idea of the spirit of God is somewhat like that of the word of God, or the angel {i.e. messenger or message) of the Lord, both sent from God and yet Himself God. These peculiar representations led many of the Jewish teachers to recognise a certain distinction in the Divine Being, between God as He is in Himself, as the infinite, invisible, incomprehensible First Cause, and God as He made Himself known to men by that Wisdom and Power, that are truly divine, yet seen in the works of Creation, Providence, and Grace. More than this general idea of distinction in the Godhead, and of a spirit working in men that is both of God and also God Himself, cannot be said to have been revealed in Old Testament times, when the great fact of God reconciling the world to Himself was only dimly seen in the future : the distinction was apt to be refined away into a philosophical abstraction, and its full meaning as a religious truth was not yet seen. More particularly from the Old Testament alone the difference between the word and the spirit of God could not be clearly gathered ; and there was a tendency to identify them and recognise only a twofold distinction in the Godhead. That which distinctly revealed the Trinity in the Godhead, which the older oracles but hinted at, and philosophy uncertainly groped after, was the manifestation -of Jesus Christ as the Word made flesh, and His teaching about Himself as truly God, and about the Spirit of God that He not only received, but promised to give. CHAPTER II. THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. WHAT our Lord Himself taught about the Spirit of Gocl is quite in harmony with the Old Testament promises, and the pro- clamation of His forerunner the Baptist ; while it throws new light on what the earlier revelation still left dark. His more popular teaching, which was mostly given in Galilee, has been reported chiefly by the first three Evangelists. We learn from these, that he spoke of the Spirit of God being upon Him, as when in the synagogue at Nazareth he applied to himself the words of the Servant of Jehovah in Isa. lxi., "The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he anointed me to preach good tidings to the poor," etc. (Luke iv. 18-20); and the truth of this claim was shown by the graciousness and power of his words causing astonishment to those who heard them, — an effect which is described also by Matthew (xiii. 54) and Mark (vi. 2). More particularly, Jesus declared that it was by the Spirit of God that He cast out demons, and that this proved that the reign of God was come upon them, i.e. that God was really setting up His kingdom on earth (Matt. xii. 28). In Luke's account, the expression is " by the finger of God " (xi. 20), which might merely denote divine power, but that Jesus meant to indicate the moral character of His power as holy, is clear from the obvious gist of His argument against those who ascribed His expulsion of demons to Beelzebub. Since the kingdom of God is, according to all the Old Testament repre- 21 2 2 THE HOLY SPIRIT. sentations, a kingdom of holiness, the Spirit by which it is established must be holy ; and by its opposition to all unclean spirits is recognised as the Spirit of God. Hence the guilt of speaking against or reviling the Holy Spirit is immeasurably greater than that of speaking against the Son of man. The Messiah may be reviled ignorantly, by men who do not see His divine Sonship in the human nature which He wears ; and for such sin there is forgiveness by God's grace to those who repent : but if a man reviles that very spirit of holiness whereby God reveals himself, he sets himself against holiness itself, seen and known as such ; and how shall such an one be delivered from sin and obtain forgiveness ? Jesus thus distinguishes the Spirit of God from Himself the Son of man ; while He speaks of both as the objects of blasphemy, i.e. reviling, an offence that can properly be committed only against a person, not against a mere power or influence. It is also taught in the discourses of Jesus recorded in the Synoptic Gospels, that the Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit, that was on Him, was to speak in His disciples, and this seems to have been said by Him on more than one occasion. Matthew reports it in connection with the sending out of the twelve (x. 20) ; Luke gives it along with the warning against blaspheming the Holy Spirit in a somewhat loosely-connected series of discourses at a later time (xii. 12); and Mark embodies it in our Lord's discourse to His disciples about the future on the Mount of Olives (xiii. 11), in a connection in which Luke reports him as saying, " I will give you a mouth and wisdom" (xxi. 15). This is one of the indica- tions in these Gospels, that Jesus gives the Spirit, or as the Baptist put it, baptizes with the Holy Spirit. He declares that the Father will give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him (Luke xi. 13); and Luke also records sayings of Jesus after His resurrection, that clearly point to the gift of the Spirit as bestowed by Him on His disciples according to the promise of the Father (Luke xxiv. 49; Acts i. 8). This is more fully declared in the great farewell discourse after THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. 23 the last Supper, recorded by John (xiv.-xvi.), in which Jesus speaks of the Holy Spirit as to be sent by the Father at His request, to supply to the disciples His own absence. There He not only uses the personal pronouns in reference to the Spirit (see especially xiv. 26 and xv. 26), but promises that the Spirit will be to them what He had been in His earthly life, " another Comforter." The word in the original is Paraclete, and is only used elsewhere, as applied to Christ, by John in his First Epistle (ii. 1), where it is rendered Advocate in English. This is its literal meaning, one who is called in, to give instruction, encouragement, or help, or to appear and plead on our behalf before an adversary or a judge. All this Jesus had done for His disciples during His earthly ministry. He had taught them the secrets of the kingdom of God ; He had been ever at hand when called for to give help in clanger, as in the storm on the sea of Galilee, or to solve difficul- ties, as when they brought questions that perplexed them to Him to answer ; He had spoken in their defence when they were accused by the Pharisees of breaking the Sabbath and neglecting the traditions of the scribes ; He had prayed for them to God when they were exposed to the temptations of the world and its prince. But now that His bodily presence was to be no longer with them, He promises to send another advocate to do for them what He had hitherto done in person. They felt not only the want of His powerful help in view of the difficulties that stared them in the face as they were to carry on the work He had begun, but more especially the loss of His affectionate loving fellowship : and this feeling, which chiefly filled their hearts, could not be met by the promise of a mere impersonal divine influence that would give them wisdom and courage. To speak, in such an hour, of a mere power or influence from God in figurative language that would naturally suggest a person, would be a cruel mockery of their sorrow, which we cannot ascribe to Jesus. He must have meant His words to be understood, in their obvious literal meaning, of a divine Agent as truly personal as Himself. The presence of the Holy Spirit was to be, in a true and higher 24 THE HOLY SPIRIT. sense, Jesus' own presence. He speaks of His coming to them, and of the Spirit's coming, as if these expressions both referred to the same thing (John xiv. 16, 18, xvi. 13, 16). He was to be with them by the Spirit. Hitherto He had been with them in the flesh ; they had known Him, just as men know their fellow-men, through the body He had assumed ; they had seen its form and heard His voice with their bodily senses. This was no longer to be ; but He was to manifest Himself to them in a higher and better way than that, by the Spirit, w T ho should take of His and show it to them, so that He should really be with them again, by His Spirit having fellowship with their spirits. His coming thus to them would also be the coming of the Father (John xiv. 23, 24), as when they really knew Him they should know the Father also. It is remarkable, that the evangelist who has recorded those sayings of Jesus does not in his own writings speak of the Spirit in such a way as clearly to imply personality ; but uses figures, such as the anointing (1 John ii. 20, 27), and God giving us of His Spirit (1 John iv. 13), which seem to refer to a power or influence. This may prove that John did not so fully unfold the revelation given by Jesus as we might have expected : but it shows us all the more how true and faithful is his record of Jesus' words. In the Epistles of James, Peter, and Jude, there is a similar indistinctness of teaching. The brevity and practical character of these letters sufficiently account for little being said of the Holy Spirit ; and while there is nothing that certainly implies His personality, there is nothing in the slightest degree inconsistent- with it. In the Book of Acts and in the Apocalypse the Spirit is described as speaking and using personal pronouns of Himself (Acts viii. 29, x. 19, 20, xi. 12, xiii. 2 ; Rev. ii. 7, xiv. 13, xxii. 17). In the Epistle to the Hebrews, whose great theme is the con- trast of the Jewish and Christian dispensations, the Holy Spirit comes into view as given in the former to prophets and other inspired men, and in the latter to all the people of God, but chiefly as manifested in miraculous gifts. But the fullest teaching about the Spirit in the New Testament THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. 25 is to be found in the Epistles of Paul, which most distinctly unfold the nature of Christianity, especially in its inward and experimental aspects. In these Epistles there are attributed to the Holy Spirit various things that can belong only to a personal being, such as "mind," in the sense of purpose or intention as expressed in intercession (Rom. viii. 27), "searching all things" (1 Cor. ii. 11), "dividing to every man severally as he will" (1 Cor. xii. 11), "being grieved " (Eph. iv. 30). Paul calls the Spirit, the Spirit of Christ (Rom. viii. 9), the Spirit of God's Son (Gal. iv. 4) ; speaks of Christ being in us, and Christ's Spirit being in us as the same thing (Rom. viii. 9, 10) ; and ascribes the same work indifferently now to God, now to Christ, and now to the Holy Spirit. In the teaching of Paul the Holy Spirit is represented as dwell- ing in Christians as the principle of moral and religious life. This is found in all his Epistles, from the earliest (1 Thess. i. 6, iv. 8 ; 2 Thess. ii. 13), through the central group (Rom. viii. 2-17 ; Gal. v. 13-26 ; 1 Cor. ii. 12-16) on to the latest (Eph. iii. 16 ; 2 Tim. i. 7, 14), while in them all the Spirit is also re- cognised as the source of supernatural gifts, such as prophecy, tongues, miracles. But it is hardly correct to say, as some have done, that the former of these representations is peculiar to Paul, and that the other New Testament writers only speak of the Spirit as the source of miraculous gifts. The notion of the Spirit of God as the giver, not only of prophetic or miraculous gifts, but of holiness, is found even in the Old Testament (Ezek. xxxvi. 27 ; Ps. cxliii. 10) ; and is implied in the words of John the Baptist, that the Messiah should baptize with the Holy Spirit. It could hardly be absent from the mind of any devout Israelite, and seems to be involved in the very name, the Holy Spirit, which is not found in the earlier Old Testament writings, but which is used by all the penmen of the New Testament. There are also express recognitions of this function of the Spirit of God in 1 Pet. i. 2, iv. 14; Jude 19, 20; 1 John iii. 11, and iv. 16 ; and perhaps in Jas. iv. 5, as well as in our Lord's conversation with Nicodemus (John iii. 3-8). These passages show at least 26 THE HOLY SPIRIT. that the idea was not unknown, though it is undoubtedly true, that Paul has unfolded it much more fully than the other New Testament writers ; and that in the Epistle to the Hebrews views of the Christian life are given which do not require the consideration of this function of the Holy Spirit. It has also been thought by some, that Paul's conception of the Holy Spirit, as the principle of the Christian life, does not require a recognition of anything more than a power proceeding from God ; and that the passages where Paul ascribes know- ledge, purpose, and will to the Spirit, are merely personifications. But it seems clear that what Paul meant to teach was not merely that a power from God is at work in believers, but that God Himself works in them. The Spirit of God is not indeed in his view an independent personality ; that is not implied in the doctrine of the personality of the Spirit ; but as the spirit of a man is to the man, so according to Paul the Spirit of God is to God, in one sense the same, but in another sense distinct. The principle of the Christian life is not a mere impersonal power, but God Himself in a mysterious way dwelling and working in the soul. But it is God working in man to lead him to God as He is above him ; hence the Spirit of God that works in him must be distinguished from God, yet not as a different being, but just as the spirit or mind of a man may be dis- tinguished from the man, and may be said to know the things of a man (i Cor. ii. 10-16). Paul's doctrine of the Spirit in this place is parallel to John's doctrine of the Word (John i. 1-18) ; and both point to an analogy between the nature of man and that of God. In man we must distinguish the soul itself from its functions of under- standing, feeling, and will, which are yet one with it ; and in the divine Being, revelation teaches us to distinguish the Father, His Son or Word, and His Spirit, who are yet one God. The doctrine of the Spirit of God as a divine person rests on the more clearly revealed doctrine of the Word or Son of God who became incarnate in Jesus Christ. If we are satisfied that THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. 27 the Word is the same as the Son of God, and is not merely a divine power or influence moving and strengthening the man Christ Jesus, nor yet a created and finite being, but one possessing all the attributes and receiving the worship proper to God ; then we must conceive the Deity as not absolutely simple in all respects, but having a certain mysterious distinction in the manner of subsistence, on the one hand as Father, and on the other hand as Son ; the Father being God as He is the source of all being, and the Son, or Word, God as He knows and manifests Himself. But if any such distinction is recog- nised in the Deity, then the way in which Jesus and His apostles speak of the Holy Spirit requires us to regard the Being so described as similar in nature to the Word ; and so to recognise, not merely a twofold, but a threefold distinction in God. The doctrine of the Holy Spirit depends upon that of the person of Christ, and comes after it, both historically and logically. Jesus taught His disciples to believe in Him as the Son of God, before He spoke to them of the Holy Spirit, as another Advo- cate ; and while the Church implicitly believed in both from the first, it was not till after she had, by much discussion, come to a distinct understanding of her faith in Christ as divine, that she arrived at similar clearness in regard to the Holy Spirit. When, too, the doctrine of the Spirit came to be discussed, appeal was made to the previously ascertained doctrine of the true deity of Christ. If it were possible to believe that Jesus was a mere man, then there would be no antecedent reason to recognise any distinction in the deity beyond that of attributes or powers, such as the Platonists and Alexandrian Jews held ; and what is said about the Spirit might be regarded as mere figurative or exaggerated descriptions of a divine influence. But if, as we believe to be the fact, we cannot do justice to the character and claims of Jesus or to the worship paid Him by His disciples, without acknowledging Him to be truly God ; then we see from His relation to the Father, that the sayings which speak personally of the Spirit may be taken more literally, 28 THE HOLY SPIRIT. while at the same time, if they are the teaching riot merely of a man sent from God, but of one who is Himself God, they cannot be so freely handled as on the other theory they must be. Were we to confine our view of the New Testament doctrine on this subject to passages that speak especially of the Holy Spirit ; we might be apt to think, that those which distinctly suggest a personal being are but few, and balanced by others which point rather to an impersonal power ; and that where cxegetical considerations are so doubtful, the preference is due to the view which implies no transcendently mysterious doctrine, and only requires allowance to be made for some rather bold personifications. But the matter will appear differently, ■ if we consider, that the understanding of what is meant by the Holy Spirit in the New Testament depends on the answer to the larger question, What is the Christian idea of God? If that implies, that the divine Being is not an absolutely simple unity, but is distinguished in itself as Father and Son ; if Christians are consecrated in baptism to the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit (Matt, xxviii. 19) ; if in the bestowal of spiritual gifts on the Church there are recognised one Spirit, one Lord, one God and Father of all (1 Cor. xii. 4-6 ; Eph. iv. 4-6) ; and if blessings are invoked from the Lord Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit as well as from God (2 Cor. xiii. 14) ; the evidence that the New Testament represents the Spirit as a person, in the same sense as the Word, is seen to be much more extensive and conclusive. CHAPTER III. THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE CREEDS OF THE CHURCH. THE truth implied in the various representations of Scripture about the Spirit has generally been expressed by theologians in the statement, that the Spirit of God is not merely a power or influence from God, but God Himself as working in the minds and hearts of men, or in other words, a divine person, though not separate or separable from the Father and the Son, but one with them in being, in perfections, and in acting. When we assert the personality of the Holy Spirit, we use the word person, not in the sense it has when applied to men, but in a modified and quite special sense. We employ it to denote a mysterious distinction in the divine Being, that Scripture makes known to us, the nature of which we cannot positively conceive ; but in virtue of which we believe that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are truly distinct, and each is truly God ; while yet there are not three Gods, but one God only. We do not profess to be able to explain wherein the distinction lies ; we can only say negatively, that it is more than a distinction of different modes of viewing the same being, as when we think of God as almighty, wise, and good ; but less than that of different beings, as when we distinguish God, angels, and men. The word person is really only a distant and imperfect analogy, — a term thrown out at an object which we cannot grasp in thought. It has a certain justification from the fact that Scripture uses personal pronouns, /, Thou, He, of the Father, the Son, and the Holy 29 30 THE HOLY SPIRIT. Spirit, and represents them as using these of and to one another ; but our use of it does not mean that there are three persons in the same sense in which we speak of three men as three human persons. Indeed it is only in modern times that this meaning of the word person has become common : at the time when it was first applied to the Godhead, it was quite correct to say, that one man might unite in himself three persons, that is, parts or characters ; and the difficulty then felt about the word was, that it seemed to make the distinctions in the Godhead too slight ; though in modern times, if understood in its ordinary sense, it makes them too great. The fact is, that it was adopted to denote something intermediate between the ancient and the modern meaning. Though we cannot positively explain what that is, it cannot be proved to involve a contradiction that there should be such a distinction in the incomprehensible being of God. This distinction is most clearly revealed to us in Jesus Christ. He spoke of Himself as the Son of God in a peculiar sense, so as to make Himself equal with God (John v. 17-23) ; as one with the Father (John x. 30-39) ; as the only one who knows the Father and is known by Him alone (Matt. xi. 27), as deserving supreme and exclusive love from all (Matt. x. 27 ; Luke xiv. 26) ; and by His immediate and inspired disciples He is called God and worshipped (John i. 1, xii. 41, xx. 28 ; Acts vii. 59; Rom. ix. 5 ; 1 Cor. i. 2 ; 2 Cor. xii. 8; 1 Pet. iii. 15; Rev. i. 17, v. 8-14). Yet it is equally clear that He is distinct from the Father since He habitually prayed to Him, spoke of Him as sending, commanding, sustaining Him. What this relation of oneness and yet distinction is in itself, we cannot understand ; but that there is such a relation, that the Father and the Son are both God and are distinct from one another, and yet are not two but one only, is proved by facts and testi- monies too many and too clear to permit us to doubt it. Now in like manner, the Holy Spirit which is given and sent by the Father and the Son, just as the Son is given and sent by the Father is described as having divine attributes, and doing divine THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE CREEDS OF THE CHURCH. 3 1 works, and is associated with the Father and the Son in the institution of baptism (Matt, xxviii. 19), and in the benediction (1 Cor. xiii. 14). Therefore the great body of Christians have believed that the Holy Spirit, like the Son of God, is truly God, yet distinct from the Father and the Son ; and have expressed what they conceive God's revelation to teach on this subject, by saying, first in the Apostolic Creed, " I believe in the Holy Ghost," that is, not merely, " I believe that there is a Holy Ghost," as I believe the Holy Catholic Church, but " I trust in the Holy Ghost," as I trust in God the Father Almighty, and in Jesus Christ His only Son our Lord. 1 Afterwards, when the true deity of the Holy Spirit was denied by some, the faith of the Church was asserted in this form : " We believe in the Holy Ghost, the Lord, the Giver of life, who proceedeth from the Father, who with the Father and the Son together is worshipped and glorified, who spake by the prophets." 2 The Church of Scotland in all her branches expresses her adherence to these ancient confessions of faith, by teaching her children to say : " There are three Persons in the Godhead, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, and these three are one God, the same in substance, equal in power and glory." We call the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, persons, because though they are not so called in the Bible, they are represented as using personal pronouns, /, Tkou t He, of themselves and each other, e.g. John xv. 26, " When the Comforter is come, whom / will send unto 1 The distinction between believing in an object of faith and simply believing is carefully observed in the Creed ; and the former phrase is used in the first three articles, the latter in all the rest. Following many of the Fathers, the Reformers laid great stress upon this, as showing that the relation of believers to the Church is entirely different irom their relation to God and Christ. We believe the Church, as we believe the forgiveness of sins, the resurrection of the body, and the life everlasting ; i.e. we regard these blessed privileges as true and real ; but we do not believe in them, i.e. trust in them, as we do in God the Father, and Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit. 2 Creed of the First Council of Constantinople, A.D. 381, commonly called the Nicene Creed. 32 THE HOLY SPIRIT. you from the Father, even the Spirit cf truth which proceedeth from the Father, He shall bear witness of mej n xvii. 6, "And now, O Father, glorify Thou me with thine own self with the glory which / had with Thee before the world was ; " Acts xiii. 2, " The Holy Ghost said. Separate Me Barnabas and Saul for the work whereunto / have called them." We say that they are " in the Godhead," and by that we mean, the being or essence of God ; and the word " substance " here means the same as " Godhead." What is the essence of God we cannot compre- hend ; but the Bible says, when it comes nearest to telling us, "God is Spirit" (John iv. 24), "God is Light" (1 John i. 5), " God is Love " (1 John iv. 8,16). Now the Comforter, whom Jesus associates with the Father and Himself, is Spirit, unseen, yet living and powerful; He is light, as holy; and He is the Spirit of love. When we say that the Holy Spirit is " the same in substance " with the Father, we mean that He has all divine perfections, and is as truly to be worshipped and trusted as the Father and the Son. We say that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father, as Jesus Himself said (John xvi. 26) ; and we understand that to mean the same as when He is called, as He so often is, the Spirit of God, or from God, that is, as it were, the breath of God. The Father is said to send the Spirit, but the Spirit is never said to send the Father ; hence we infer that the order in which they act is not a mere variable one, but depends on their mode of being, in which the Father is of none, while the Spirit is of the Father, not created or made in time, but eternally proceeding, or breathed out, as it were, from the Father. It is because of this mysterious relation that we can say that the Father works by the Spirit, and that our recognition and honour of the Holy Spirit do not detract from the worship due to the Father, but are a part of it. Then, as we find that the Holy Spirit is also sent by Christ, and is called the Spirit of God's Son ; and that Christ is represented as working by the Spirit, we think it proper to say, that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Son as well as from the Father. Though THE SPIRIT OF GOD IN THE CREEDS OF THE CHURCH. 33 that is not said in so many words in Scripture, yet we think these other expressions show, that the thing that is meant by them is as true in relation to the Son as to the Father. On this point there is a difference between the Eastern or Greek Church and the Western or Roman ; for the theologians of the East did not recognise the force of the arguments just indicated ; and thought it better to keep to the express words of Jesus, and say only, that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father; while the Western Church added to the Creed the words, "and from the Son" (Filioque). The Protestant Churches have generally thought that the doctrine thus asserted is true ; but that it is not so clearly revealed, or so practically important, as to warrant a separation of Churches on account of different views about it. The doctrine of the Holy Spirit being a divine Person, one with God the Father and Jesus Christ His Son, is one that can not only be proved from Scripture as a revealed truth, but also, to some extent, verified in the religious experience of Christians. Every one who is earnestly seeking to live a life of holiness and communion with God, must feel that he has great difficulty and opposition to contend against. The world, with its business, and cares, and pleasures, tends to draw his mind away from thoughts of God and intercourse with Him who is unseen : the passions, or habits of selfishness, sloth, or pride, make him disinclined to the active disinterested love that is the fulfilling of the moral law : strong and subtle temptations often present themselves to him. He cannot overcome these by any efforts or resolutions of his own will ; and the divine law, with all its authority and repre- sentations of absolute duty, is unable to raise him above them. He is conscious of an experience similar to that which Paul describes in Rom. vii. 14-25. But when he looks to Christ, and trusts in God's grace and love, is he not conscious of another power in him, lifting him above the influence of the world, the flesh, and the devil, and moving him to love and serve God ? It is the power of divine grace or love that has taken possession of his soul. There is something in the Christian's experience C 34 THE HOLY SPIRIT. beyond his own conscious efforts of will or purpose, something that influences him, he cannot tell how or why ; it does not come at his will, but often seizes hold of him when he has not been wishing or expecting it ; a passage of Scripture, or a truth of religion, or an example of Christian character, may be at one time the means of arousing deep feeling and heavenly aspiration, when at other times these very things may be presented to him without making any impression. This influence that is at work upon him is therefore independent of outward circumstances, as well as of his own will : it is a power not himself that is working for righteousness. But if so, can it be different from that power which so works in the world, and which we believe to be not a mere impersonal stream of tendency, nor a power absolutely inscrutable, of which we can know nothing, but the living God ? There is the same reason to believe that the power making for righteousness of which we are conscious in ourselves is personal, as that the power we see in the moral government of the world is so. Yet this power working in us prompts us to adoration, love, and prayer to God as our Father, and to trust in Christ as our Saviour ; hence we are naturally led to conclude, that this power, which the Bible calls the Spirit of God, is a divine Person distinct from God the Father and Jesus Christ His Son, though one in character and being with both. So it has been found in the history of the Church that many men, like Thomas Scott x and Robert Hall, 2 have been led by their spiritual experience to the Trinitarian doctrine of the Holy Spirit ; and generally those who have accepted this doctrine have done so not only because it has appeared to be taught by revelation, but also because it satisfied some of the deepest wants of their consciences and hearts. 3 1 See Scott's Force of Truth, Part ii. 2 See Dr. Gregory's Memoir of Robert Hall, in Hall's Works, vol. vi. p. 52. 3 SeeWace, Christianity and Morality, Boyle Lectures, 1875; Lecture vii., "The Doctrine of the Trinity a Moral Revelation." PART II. THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT. ■o- INTRODUCTORY. In the Old Testament, as we have already seen, the Spirit of God is described as working in the creation, preservation, and government of the material world. To this agency there is no direct reference in the New Testament, though it is logically presupposed in the fact that various physical as well as moral effects are ascribed to the Spirit of God, such as miracles, speaking with tongues, and the transportation of persons from one place to another (Acts viii. 39, 40). An agent that can produce such effects in the material world, cannot be limited to mental and moral influence ; and since the Spirit is called the finger of God (Matt. xii. 28 ; Luke xi. 20), and identified with God Himself, we cannot doubt that Jesus and His apostles assumed the Old Testament view of God creating and preserving all things by His Spirit as well as by His word, though they had no occasion directly to assert it. As they have not done so, it is well not to enter into speculations on this work of the Spirit further than to observe, that as the doctrine, that God made and sustains all things by His Word, implies that the universe is not only a work of God but a manifestation of Him, so the corre- sponding doctrine, that God made and sustains all things by His Spirit, shows that God is to be regarded, not merely as a remote First Cause, but as a present agent in all things, in whom we live 35 36 THE HOLY SPIRIT. and move and have our being. And both doctrines together show, that Christianity, which is our fellowship with the Son and the Spirit of God, is a world-wide and world-subduing religion, because it is the communion with those divine agencies by which the whole universe is created, preserved, and governed. This principle underlies the argument of the Epistle to the Hebrews, and Paul's triumphant confidence in Rom. viii. and elsewhere. But the work of the Spirit that is directly described in the New Testament, is that which has to do immediately with our salvation. That work may be designated generally in our Lord's own words us glorifying Him (John xvi. 14), even as Christ's work was to glorify the Father (John xvii. 4). Now just as Christ's work of glorifying the Father included both a subjective work of making Him known to men — " I manifested thy name unto the men whom thou gavest me out of the world . . . the words which thou gavest me, I have given unto them" (John xvii. 6, 8), and an objective work of satisfying God's justice for them — " for their sakes I sanctify myself" (John xvii. 19) ; so the work of the Holy Spirit glorifying Jesus may be viewed also as falling into two parts; there is an objective part, which is outside of those who are to be saved, and includes all that the Spirit does to make Jesus glorious, and manifest Him as such ; and a subjective part which is within the souls of men, and includes what He does to enable us to see Christ to be glorious, and to give glory to Him by faith, love, and obedience. The objective or outward work of the Spirit includes His work on Christ, His being sent by Christ, and His presenting Christ to the world in the Word : the subjective or inward work of the Spirit includes His operations in the soul, convincing, converting, sanctifying, teaching, and comforting. CHAPTER I. THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ON CHRIST. The New Testament is pre-eminently the dispensation of the Spirit, fulfilling the promises that God would pour out His Spirit on all flesh (Joel ii. 28), put His Spirit within His people's hearts, and so write His law there (Ezek. xxxvi. 26, 27). This was also predicted to be done through the Servant of Jehovah, the root out of the stem of Jesse, who was to be Himself anointed with the Spirit of God (Isa. xi. 1-4, xlii. 1-4, lxi. 1-3). Accordingly we find in the New Testament that the Holy Spirit is represented primarily as working upon and in Jesus Christ. In the first place, the Holy Spirit is described as the agent in the miraculous conception of Jesus (Matt. i. 20 ; Luke i. 35). Though this fact is mentioned explicitly only by these evangelists, their accounts are manifestly independent, and while varying in details agree in substance. The one may represent the report transmitted from Joseph, and the other that coming from Mary. But if not expressly stated, it is presupposed by other New Testament writers, that the beginning of Jesus' human life was not an ordinary one. John reports His saying, "that which is begotten of the flesh is flesh," and therefore needs to be begotten again: but He excludes Himself when He says, "ye must be born again ; " hence we may infer that He was in some peculiar way begotten not of the flesh but of the Spirit. Paul says that God sent His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and that while He was born of a woman, of the seed of David according to the 37 38 THE HOLY SPIRIT. flesh, He knew no sin. Since all men born according to the ordinary law of nature inherit sin and death from Adam, He who has no sin and saves His people from their sin must needs have been begotten of the Holy Spirit. In virtue of this agency it was that He grew up filled with wisdom, and the grace of God was upon Him (Luke ii. 40) ; that He advanced in wisdom and stature, and in favour with God and men (Luke ii. 52), needing no repentance or conversion, but holy, harmless, undefiled, tempted in all things like as we are, yet without sin (Heb. iv. 15, vii. 26). The holiness of the human nature of our Lord is not to be ascribed directly to its union to the divine nature by the Incarna- tion. The proper effect of that was to elevate it to the highest dignity, inasmuch as it became the human nature of the eternal Son of God, the soul and body that was for ever a part of His very self. But this wonderful union did not make His soul or body one whit less truly human ; and the holiness he had in His human nature is human holiness, not something above our nature, but the very perfection and crown of it ; and in this He is like His brethren, receiving the aid of the Holy Spirit. His being God did not make the preservation of holiness in an ungodly world at all more easy to His flesh and blood, nay His task was all the harder. Hence we read that He received the Holy Spirit, was filled with the Spirit, led of the Spirit, anointed with the Holy Spirit ; that He was much in prayer to God, and was encouraged by voices from heaven, and strengthened by an angel. The various points or stages in His life on earth, at which special mention is made of His being under the influence of the Spirit, are worthy of notice. The first is when He entered on His public work, identifying Himself with those whom John called to repentance, by receiving baptism from one who confessed that he had need to be baptized by Jesus. Then He saw the heavens opened, and the Holy Spirit descending on Him in visible form as a dove, and heard a voice THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ON CHRIST. 39 from heaven saying, " This is my beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased." This was for Him a testimony of His Father's approval, which would strengthen and encourage His human soul ; and it would seem that along with it there was not a mere symbol, but an actual communication to His human nature of the gracious influence of the Holy Spirit. Immediately afterwards we read that Jesus was full of the Holy Spirit (Luke iv. 1), and we can hardly avoid connecting that with the occurrence at His baptism. He was now endowed to the full in His humanity with all the wisdom, and power, and zeal, and love, needed for carrying out His great commission as the Saviour of the world. Then He was led (Matt. iv. 1 ; Luke iv. 1), or as Mark (i. 12) expresses it, driven forth by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by Satan. Before beginning His Messianic work, He sought retirement : away from His townsmen of Nazareth and the throngs surrounding the Baptist, He would fix His mind on the nature and means of His enterprise. Here He encountered and overcame those suggestions of the prince of this world, that would have led Him to attempt His work in a selfish, vainglorious, or worldly spirit. He suffered being tempted, yet without sin, for He was full of the Holy Spirit, and had been led to this conflict by the Spirit. Next we read that He returned in the power of the Spirit (Luke iv. 14) to begin His work of proclaiming and establishing the kingdom of God. Thereafter He speaks of Himself as having the Spirit of God on Him in His teaching (Luke iv. 8), and of casting out demons by the Spirit of God (Matt. xii. 28) ; and Peter afterwards declared that " God anointed him with the Holy Spirit and with power, who went about doing good and healing all that were oppressed of the devil, for God was with him" (Acts x. 38). We can hardly doubt also that the great act by which He gave Himself a sacrifice for the sins of men was performed in the power of the Holy Spirit ; and this is possibly the meaning of the saying in Heb. ix. 14, that He " through the eternal Spirit 40 THE HOLY SPIRIT. offered himself without blemish to God ; " although some of the best interpreters prefer to understand the eternal Spirit as His own divine nature. The reference to the Holy Spirit has however a great deal in its favour. After His resurrection He is still represented as giving com- mandment to His apostles through the Holy Spirit (Acts i. 2) ; and thus from first to last His work is described as carried on in the power of the Spirit of God given to Him. This is that anointing which He had for His office, in virtue of which He is the Messiah or Christ, i.e. the Anointed One ; and this shows us that He is qualified for all the parts of our salvation, not only as God but also as man. He is able perfectly to teach us as a prophet, not merely because He knows all things as God, but because His human mind is enlightened and taught by the Spirit of God : He can appear for us as a great high priest, because He can bear gently with the ignorant and erring, for that He Himself also was compassed with infirmity, and needed the support of the Holy Spirit : He can rule us as a perfect king, because He is not only Almighty God, but our brother, conquering His and our enemies by the power of the Spirit. Hence, too, when He bestows the Holy Spirit He gives a blessing that He has Himself received and enjoys, and makes us joint-partakers in it with Himself. Thus we read, not only of the gift, but of the communion of the Holy Spirit, i.e. partaking in common of the privilege and blessing of having the Spirit of God given to us. It is a fellowship of believers with one another, but also with Christ ; they receive the same anointing as He did ; it is like the precious ointment on the head of Aaron, that flowed down his beard, and descended even to the skirts of his garments. All the members of our great high priest partake of the anointing of the Holy Spirit, that is given to Him their Head. This work of the Holy Spirit on Christ affords an explanation of a passage that has caused not a little difficulty to commentators, John xiv. 16, 17 : " I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may be with you for ever ; even THE WORK OF THE HOLY SPIRIT ON CHRIST. 4 1 the Spirit of truth : whom the world cannot receive, for it behoklcth him not, neither knoweth him : ye know him, for he abideth with you and shall be in you." The gift of the Spirit here promised is future ; the disciples received it after our Lord's departure, when so remarkable a change appeared in their whole mental and moral character. How then does Jesus say, "he abideth with you," giving that as the reason why they knew Him? Many understand these statements, though present in form, as future in meaning, so that the sense would be, Ye shall soon know Him, for He shall abide with you. This however is not satis- factory, because the contrast with the world's ignorance, which is undoubtedly present, requires that the disciples' knowledge be present too. Besides, that knowledge is clearly given as the reason why they can receive the Spirit, as the world cannot. It is more in accordance with the force of the words to understand " He abideth with you " as referring to the dwelling of the Spirit in Christ, from which they had come to know Him, though He was not yet in them as He was afterwards to be. 1 The presence of the Spirit of God in Jesus was manifested by His speaking the words of God ; as the Baptist said, " He whom God hath sent speaketh the words of God : for he giveth not the Spirit by measure" (John iii. 36); and the disciples had recognised this, when Peter said, " Lord, to whom shall we go ? thou hast the 1 This explanation is given by J. C. Hare, Mission of the Comforter, pp. 308, 309: " If we make a distinction between the outward and the inward presence of the Spirit, and suppose that the apostles as yet had only enjoyed the former, recognising His power in a measure, as manifested in the life and discourse of their Lord, and being so far enlightened by Him as to discern the divine character of that power, then the promise of the higher gift to them would be in full conformity with that principle, which runs through the whole Scripture, as it does through all the dispensations of life, that to him who has shall be given." In confirmation of this view it may be noticed, that the words rendered "with you" are not the same as in ver. 16. There they mean exactly ' ' along with you ; " here, ' ' beside you. " On the other hand, however, many weighty authorities read in the last clause of ver. 17 "is in you," for " shall be in you." If that be correct, the interpretation just given must be abandoned. But while the external evidence is pretty equally balanced, internal considerations are in favour of the future tense. 42 THE HOLY SPIRIT. words of eternal life. And we have believed and know that thou art the Holy One of God" (John vi. 68, 69). It was the blindness and sin of the Pharisees that they would not and could not recog- nise in Jesus' works the agency of the Holy Spirit, but ascribed them to Beelzebub. In His work on the man Christ Jesus, the Spirit of God is more fully revealed as the Holy Spirit than ever before. Under the Old Testament He had been recognised as the spirit of wisdom and skill in a leader like Moses or an artificer like Bezaleel, as the spirit of strength and courage clothing men like Gideon, Jephthah, Samson, and as the spirit of prophecy in Samuel and his successors : but there had never been seen a perfectly holy man. That was the new thing that appeared in Jesus. CHAPTER II. THE SENDING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT BY CHRIST. Jesus was described by John the Baptist not only as one who had the Holy Spirit dwelling in Him in a manner and fulness that no other man ever had, but also as baptizing with the Holy Spirit (Matt. iii. n ; Mark i. 8 ; Luke iii. 16 ; John i. 33). This is what marked Him out as the Messiah, or Founder of the kingdom of God ; for there were numerous prophecies which declared that the reign of Jehovah, that was to bring blessedness to His people, was to be established by the Spirit of God. So Jesus Himself spoke of the Holy Spirit as the best gift of God to men, which as the Heavenly Father He will give to them that ask Him (Luke xi. 13). When He invited all the thirsty to come to Him and drink, and promised to give to everyone that believed in Him an abundant supply, so that he should be a well of living water, the evangelist tells us that He spake of the Spirit which they that believed in Him should receive ; and the same evange- list has recorded those farewell discourses in which Jesus promised to send to His disciples another Comforter to supply His place and carry on His work. Of the fulfilment of these promises there was an outward and visible proof in the events of the day of Pentecost after Jesus' death. But the signs that then appeared to the senses, the sound as of a mighty rushing wind from heaven, the tongues of fire, and even the rapt prophetic utterance of the praises of God by the Galilean disciples of Jesus in strange tongues, formed but the out- 43 44 THE HOLY SPIRIT. ward and less truly divine side of the event. More truly wonderful was the inward change effected in the disciples and in the people of Jerusalem. In the disciples of Jesus we see a new understand- ing, a new courage, and a new love : in the multitude an entire revolution of their views and feelings about Jesus. The disciples had already indeed received some spiritual en- lightenment, for they had recognised Jesus as the Messiah, and that not only because of the miracles He did, but because they felt that He had the words of eternal life. They had clung to this faith, even when others were offended by His refusal to accept an earthly crown and by His claim of a heavenly origin. Still they had no idea that it was through suffering and death that He was to enter into His glory ; and they looked for places of worldly distinc- tion in His kingdom. They thought He should call down fire from heaven on those who would not receive Him, and even at the last they looked for an immediate restoration of the kingdom to Israel. But on the day of Pentecost we find them proclaiming, that Jesus who had been crucified had entered upon His kingdom, and was really reigning, and no longer do they think of any earthly reign of the Messiah. But while they thus showed new and enlarged knowledge, the new courage with which they uttered their convictions was still more remarkable. Formerly, when their Master was not with them , they had been timid and inconsistent : in His absence they failed to do works of healing which they attempted ; when He set His face to go up to Jerusalem, they were amazed and afraid, and followed Him with fear as to certain death (Mark x. 33 ; John xi. 8, 16) ; in His hour of danger all forsook Him and fled, and Peter was ashamed to confess Him even before the maid-servants of the high priest. Even after His resurrection they only ven- tured to meet with closed doors for fear of the Jews. But on the day of Pentecost they openly declare their faith in Jesus, and boldly accuse the people of the unspeakable guilt of rejecting and crucifying the Messiah, for whom Israel had been looking so long. THE SENDING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT BY CHRIST. 45 There is further manifest in the bearing and discourse of the disciples a wonderful tone of forbearance and love to those who had been the enemies and murderers of their Master. Naturally they might be filled with the bitterest indignation and wrath ; and if before they were ready to call down fire from heaven on a Samaritan village simply for not receiving Him on His journey, what threatenings and vengeance might they not be expected to breathe out against the people of Jerusalem who had forced the Roman governor to crucify Him ? They do indeed press home on their consciences the awful guilt of their conduct ; but they do it evidently more in sorrow than in anger : they do not in the least exaggerate the crime or dwell on its atrocity ; they denounce no judgment upon it ; they address the guilty people as brethren ; they earnestly exhort them to repentance, and cordially convey to them God's promise of forgiveness and the gift of the Holy Spirit if they will but repent. In Peter's speech after the healing of the lame man, he dwells on the fact that their great sin was committed in ignorance, and was overruled by God for the accomplishment of His gracious purpose (Acts iii. 17, 18). In all this there is a tone of generosity, of fellow-feeling, of love, like that of Joseph toward his brethren (Gen. xlv. 5 foil.), yea like that of Jesus Himself, from whom they learned it through the influence of the Holy Spirit. Such was the spiritual change wrought on those who had already believed in Jesus : it was largely due, no doubt, to the fact of His resurrection, and without that it would be incredible ; but they ascribed it also to the influence of the Spirit that Jesus had promised, giving them power to be witnesses for Him. This Spirit too, according to His promise, wrought on the hearts of those who heard their testimony. The outward sign of their speaking with tongues produced wonder and gained atten- tion to Peter's address ; but the address itself carried conviction to the hearts of those who had not many weeks before clamoured for the death of Jesus as a deceiver and blasphemer, and made three thousand willing to enrol themselves as His disciples, 46 THE HOLY SPIRIT though He was still so regarded by the authorities. This too they did under a sense of guilt, and by accepting the rite of baptism, which signified the giving up of their entire past life as polluted, and the acceptance of forgiveness and renewal in the name of Jesus : and they did begin a new life with a love, hope, and joy unknown before, parting with all their goods and casting them into a common stock, and doing all this with alacrity, eating their meat with gladness and joyfulness of heart. Thus as an actual historical fact the Church of the New Covenant was founded by the Spirit of God sent down from heaven, working in men's hearts as a purifying and animating fire, cleansing them from earthly affections, and warming them with brotherly love and charity : and this renewing influence was given in connection with the testimony of the exaltation of Him who had first taught and shown such holiness and love to men. There are also various indications given, that the connection of the gift of the Holy Spirit with the work of Christ as our Redeemer is peculiarly close and necessary. The fourth evangelist, remarking on Jesus' promise of living water (vii. 39), says " the Spirit was not yet given because Jesus was not yet glorified ; " and he records Jesus' saying (xvi. 7), " If I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you ; but if I go, I will send him unto you." That Jesus' departing and being glorified have special reference to His death appears not only from His sayings in John xii. 23, 24, xiii. 31-33, but from that recorded by Luke xxiv. 49, where, after saying that the Scriptures must needs be fulfilled that the Christ should suffer and rise again from the dead the third day, and that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in His name unto all the nations, he adds : "And behold I send forth the promise of my Father upon you " (compare Acts i. 4, 5, ii. 33). Paul states the connection still more explicitly when he writes to the Galatians, " Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law, having become a curse for us . . , that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles, that we might receive the promise of the Spirit through faith" (iii. 13, 14); and again, THE SENDING OF THE HOLY SPIRIT BY CHRIST. 47 "God sent forth His Son, made of a woman, made under the law, that He might redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. And because ye are sons, God sent forth the Spirit of His Son into your hearts 7 ' (iv. 4-6). The principle of this connection is indicated when Paul says that God hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in Christ ; for these blessings include not only redemption and forgiveness, but also the seal and earnest of the Spirit which are all ours in Christ (Eph. i. 3, 7, 13, 14). Sin excludes man from God's blessing, and exposes him to God's wrath and curse, and that implies that God gives over the sinner to his own evil passions (Rom. i. 18, 24, 26, 28). This is the righteous judgment of God, and whatever good is yet bestowed by God on sinners, even His forbearance, not less truly than His forgiveness, is based upon that manifestation of His righteousness made by Christ, whom God hath set forth as a propitiation in His blood through faith (Rom. iii. 24-26). This passage also indicates how these statements of the dependence of the gift of the Spirit on the atoning work of Christ are to be harmonized with the undeniable fact, that the Holy Spirit was bestowed on men in various ways long before Jesus came in the flesh. For it tells us, that His work had a bearing on the passing by of the sins of the past, as well as on the justification of believers at that time and later. As justifying God's gracious dealings with men, it had a retrospective as well as a prospective bearing. Its results were applied by anticipation as it were, because its accomplishment was absolutely certain from the beginning. Hence Jesus, as the spotless Lamb by whose blood we are redeemed, is said to have been foreknown before the foundation of the world (1 Pet. i. 20), and is called the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world (Rev. xiii. 8). As a transaction in the moral government of God the atoning death of Christ has, we may say, no date ; it is not conditioned by time at all, but is ever present to the eternal mind of God, as it is also present to our faith, which overleaps the limits of time and place and apprehends a dying Saviour here 48 THE HOLY SPIRIT. and now, as often as we look to Him. The dependence of the work of the Holy Spirit on that of Christ is not essentially chrono- logical, but logical and ideal ; and so, even when the Spirit was bestowed on men earlier in time than the redemption of Christ was accomplished, it was given on the ground of that redemption as a necessary condition. But as it was designed that the con- nection should be made manifest, the most signal and abundant effusion of the Spirit was historically after Christ's redemption had become an accomplished fact. Then the Spirit began to exert His gracious influence not only on a few outstanding men in the community, as leaders, prophets, or kings, but on the mass of the people as a whole, and on each single soul among them. Then too the Spirit could work with more power in manifesting to men the love and grace of God, since these had been actually exercised in the highest and most wonderful degree in the life and death of God's Son for sinners. The redemption of Christ is not only the necessary condition, but the appropriate instru- ment of the Spirit's work. He bears witness of Christ along with the messengers whom He sends (John xv. 26, 27), and when He convinces the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment, it is by making man see what Jesus had done and suffered. CHAPTER III. THE WORK OF THE SPIRIT IN THE EXTERNAL CALL OF THE WORD. While Jesus and His disciples alike teach, in accordance with the intimations of Old Testament prophecy, that the kingdom of God is to be established by the working of His Spirit in the hearts of men ; they declare with equal emphasis that it is also needful that the kingdom be proclaimed, and men called to receive and enter it. The announcement, that the reign of God foretold by the prophets is at hand, is the gospel or glad tidings, that occupies so large and prominent a place in the New Testament ; of which Jesus said, " This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in the whole world for a testimony unto all the nations " (Matt. xxiv. 14) ; of which Paul says, " How shall they believe in him whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher ?" (Rom. x. 14) ; and which Peter declares to be " the Word of the Lord which abideth for ever" (1 Pet. i. 25). This proclamation is accompanied with a call to believe and obey the reign of God, or, as it is often expressed, to repentance, that is, to a change of mind and heart, giving up sin as a rebellion against God, trusting in His mercy to forgive it, and returning to our allegiance to Him as our rightful and chosen King. The importance attached in Scripture to the gospel indicates the general principle, that while God turns us to Himself by the power of His Spirit, He deals with us in accordance with our nature, as creatures possessing reason and free-will. He does not move men to faith and obedience by the same kind of power v 5