IN MEMORY OF William Cullen Bryant. Born, 1794 -Died, (878. FROM THE LIBRARY OF REV. LOUIS FITZGERALD BENSON. D. D. BEQUEATHED BY HIM TO THE LIBRARY OF PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY Di^ridoa Section IN MEMORY OF nNG Post shortly after its composition, have misled many persons to believe that it was written for this journal originally. The first editorial par- agraph, however, of the number in which the stirring lyric occurs, will at once disabuse the reader's mind of that impression, and show just bow much of a foundation in truth it had : Tlie Nev) York Revieicand Atheneum Magazine. — We have had lying on our desk for some time, the first number of this work, and have, from day to day, intended, in compliance with our feelings, and a strong sense of duty, to express our opinion of its superior merits at some length, by way of urging it upon our readers to show a liberal patronage on the first buddings of a flower wliich gives promise that it will be an ornament to our city. We have not time to do tliis now ; we will, therefore, only say, that its poetic de^jartment is suj)ported in a style that extorts our unfeigned and unqualified admiration. As a 8j)ecimen, we extract, this evening, an efFunion of the loftiest character, entitled Marco Bozarris, the eminent beauties of which do not lie u])(m tlie surface, but with which, on every new reading, we are charmed, and also sur- prised, that they had escaped us on a former perusal. We shall take an early opportunity to give another piece from this number, entitled Pikairn's Island — one of the sweetest pictures that a highly cultivated fancy ever drew." A later number of the Evening Post fulfilled the promise of this closing sentence, and copied Mr. Bryant's " Song of Pitcairn's Island," with its modest signature " B." The galaxy of talent engaged in this literary enterprise, though it included such bright, par- ticular stars as Willis, Dana and Bancroft, be- side Ilalleck and Bryant, could not save it from the fate which has swallowed up many another setting out with the brightest prospects. Mr. Bryant ard his associate did not continue their labors many months ; and in the Evening Post of the 17th of March, 1826, we find a card, copied from the latest number of the New York Literary Gazette, and signed by James G. Brooks and George Bond, announcing the union of the two periodicals, conducted by them respectively, in one, to bear the joint name. The Ncv) York Literary Gazette and American Atheneum. In Jul}' of the same year this magazine was con- solidated with the United States Literary Gazette, the lesser title being sunk in the greater, and in September the United States IMerary Gazette lost its identity in turn and became the United States Heview, with simultaneous publication in New York and Boston. In 1826, Bryant was invited to share with Coleman the editorship of the Evening Post, and soon made his utterances a matter of political and social consequence. The story of his long connection with the newspaper press, and the course which his own sheet followed during that period, will be told in its proper place. We ma}^ remark here, how- ever, that his notion of the educational aspects of journalism extended to the forms of literary expression as well as to the collection of facts and the moulding of public opinion. On the 11th of May, 1827, the Evening Post contained the following editorial paragraph, which there is every reason to ascribe to its late chief: " Affectations of Expression. — We are tired of the affectations which are often to be met with in some of our newspapers, and cannot but ex. 23 press a hope that they will be totally discarded, since they cannot be justified — such, for instance, as 'over' a signature, in the "Washington news- papers ; ' consolate,' in those of Kentucky ; ' was being built,' a late innovation of some English authors, and copied here ; ' the Misses Gilling- liam,' in several publications. These are all that offer themselves at this time, and ought to be cor- rected, as being neither correct English nor pleasant to the ear, nor expressive of any new idea." This was but the beginning of a half century's crusade against inelegance and inaccuracy in the use of our mother tongue. Outside of the line of his professional duty he sometimes wielded his literary pruning knife, and, as an example of the good use he made of it, we may quote this letter, which was sent to a young man who asked for a criticism upon an article he had written : " My young friend, I observe that you have used several French expressions in your letter. I think if j'ou will study the English language that you will find it capable of expressing all the ideas that you may have. I have always found it so, and in all that I have written I do not recall an instance where I was tempted to use a foreign word but that, on searching, I have found a bet- ter one in my own language. " Be simple, unaffected ; be honest in j'our speaking and writing. Never use a long word when a short one will do as well. " Call a spade by its name, not a well-known oblong instrument of manual labor ; let a home be a home and not a residence ; a place, not a lo- cality, and so on of the rest. "When a short word will do you will always lose by a long one. You lose in clearness ; you lose in honest expression of meaning ; and, in the estimation of all men who are capable of judging, you lose in reputa- tion for ability. " The only true wa3- to shine, even in this false world, is to be modest and unassuming. False- hood may be a thick crust, but in the course of time truth will find a place to break through. Elegance of language may not be in the power of us all, but simplicity and straightforwardn^s are." Beside his regular journalistic duties, Bryant found time to do a good deal of literary work. He was associated with Verplanck and Robert C. Sands in editing the Talisman, a very success- ful annual, during the years from 1827 to 1830. He also contributed two stories, entitled respec- tively " Medfield" and "The Skeleton's Cave" to the " Tales of the Glauber Spa," a compi- lation including in its list of authors Messrs. Paulding, Leggett and Sands, and Miss Sedg- ! wick. In 1832, the literary circle with which he was most intimately connected was broken by the death of Sands, and Verplanck and Bryant jointly edited his works. In the same year a complete edition of Bryant's j poems was published in N'ew York, and Mr. Verplanck, who was acquainted with ^Vashington Irving, then Secretary of the American Legation I in London, sent a copy to the latter, with a private i note requesting his patronage in introducing the I young poet to the British public. Irving under- i took the task with an almost affectionate interest, I although his literar}^ ward was quite unknown to ! him. With the little volume of verses in his I pocket, he traversed the streets of London seek- j ing a publisher. Murray was visited in due j course. He ran his thumb over the edge of the I pages, glanced at a line here and another there, paused a moment over a stanza that caught his eye with some familiar name, and then handed the book back. " Thank you, no," he said, with a polite smile. " Poetry does not sell at present ; I don't think I can use this." Murray was a man w4io always had money to invest in a w^ork that showed any promise of success, and a less per- sistent advocate than Irving would have left his presence with a sinking heart. Not so Geoffrey Craycn, Gent. To his credit be it said that when he could not get what he wanted he resolved to take the next best thing ; and after a tedious hunt he hit upon a bookseller in Bond street, named Andrews, who looked askance at the ven- ture, but agreed to go into it if Irving would put his own name on the title page of the book as editor. The offer was accepted under the im- pression that the editor's duties would be merely nominal. Delusive hope ! The loyal Briton had got his types almost ready for the press, when he drove in hot haste to Mr. Irving's house one morning, and requested a moment's inter- view. " This will never do, sir ! " he cried, with some warmth. " We cannot sell a dozen copies in all England if this stands as it is now. It would be as much as my trade is worth to let such a thing go out of my shop ! " Irving, much astounded at the excitement manifested by his visitor, followed the latter's M index finger with liis eye, and read the line on which it rested — " The Britisli soldier trembles" — in the " Song- of Marion's Men," " There, sir," continued Mr, Andrews, in the triumphant tone of a noan who has carried con- viction to the mind of an adversary in debate, " what do you tliink of that ? '" " "Well." said Irvinf^, " what do you suggest?" " You must alter it, sir ; you must cut out either the ' British soldier/ or the ' trembles ' — I don't care which. There are the seeds of war in the line as it stands, and I would rather destroy the whole edition than put my name on it as it is now." Irving could ill conceal a grimace of amuse- ment at the mountain that had grown up in this patriot's mind from so little a molehill ; but his merriment changed to indignation when the bookseller picked out three or four other lines which could possibly be tortured into a slur upon British bravery, and demanded that they also be "edited" with severity. After an ex- tended colloquy, a compromise was reached, Irving agreeing to remodel — "The British soldier trembles—" so that it should read — " The foeman trembles in his camp — " and to make an insignificant alteration in anoth- er place, in deference to the supposed sensitive- ness of the British public a half century after Marion's men had beaten their swords into l)loughshares and resumed the arts of peace. This first London edition was dedicated by Irving to Samuel Rogers, the poet, in a note, saying that, during an intimacy of some years' standing, the writer had remarked the interest which Rogers had taken in the rising fortunes and character of America, and the disposition he had to foster American talent, whether in litera- ture or art : "The descriptive writings of Mr, Bryant," the note goes on, "are essentially American. They transport us into the depths of the solemn, primeval forest — to the shores of the lonely lake — to tlic banks of the wild, nameless stream, or the brow of the rocky upland, rising like a promontory from amidst a wide ocean of foliage; while they shed around us the glories of a climate fierce in its extremes, but splendid in all its vicissitudes." The volume was gener- ously reviewed by John Wilson in BJackioood's Magazine, and from that day Bryant had a Euro- pean reputation. In 1825 the Sketch Club was founded in New York, as a social reunion of artists and ama- teurs. Among its original members were Morse, Verplanck, Weir, Huntington, Ingraham, Wall, Durand, Cummings, Inman, Verbruyck, Agate Cole and Gourlie. To several of these, and also to sundry members of the Academy of Design, Bryant sat for his portrait. Morse's painting was preserved in the Academy's collection ; In- man's was engraved for the Deynocratic Review, and one by Gray went into the possession of the New York Historical Society. This was not the only encouragement given to art by the young poet and journalist. When the Academy of Design was in its infanc}'^, one of its duties was the support of a series of lectures on various subjects pertaining to art, partly for the benefit of its own members, but more particularly for the advantage of persons who were studying art as an occupation for life; and Br3"ant delivered a course on Greek and Roman Mythology — the fruits of the deep research in classic lore which began with his school days, had continued with unabated interest up to that time, and found a fitting conclusion, when the scholar was well on toward eighty years of age, in the translation of Homer's immortal epics. Although a con- noisseur in art, Bryant never owned a very large collection of pictures or statuary, enjoj'ing the study of a painting or a marble quite as much in the possession of a friend as if it ornamented his own drawing-room. Soon after Bryant came to New York, Cooper went to Europe and travelled for some years. When he returned he selected Cooperstown, N. Y., for his home, so that in his later life he and Bryant saw little of each other. Then occurred that battle of words between the novelist and the newspaper press which some of our older readers will doubtless recall, in which Mr. Cooper exhibited a good deal of unnecessary spleen. Bryant, though conducting a journal which was looked to as an authority in matters of literary news and criticism, forbore to take any 25 part in the quarrel, loyalty to his friend on the one side and to his adopted profession on the other disposing him to maintain a dignified silence, Mr. Coleman's death, in 1829, left Mr. Bryant in sole editorial control of the Evening Post, and he shortly after engaged as an assistant William Leggett, a young journalist of some reputation for both industry in the routine duties of his pro- fession and a rather aggressive advocacy of any cause which had awakened his interest. Having been made a zealous freetrader and democrat by his chief, this gentleman became one of the pro- prietors of the journal. This left Mr. Bryant free to think of some other things beside daily labor at the desk, and in 1834 he sailed for Europe with his family, intending to pass a few years in liter- ary study at the foreign capitals, and superintend the education of his children. He travelled ex- tensively for two years in France, Italy and Ger- many, and was enjoying his recreation to the ut- most when news reached him from America that Mr, Leggett was very ill. Returning home with all haste, he arrived in New York just in time to check the Evexing Post in a career of adversity, brought upon it by the unnecessary vehemence with which its temporary conductor thrust sun- dry unpopular opinions of his own in the faces of its readers and advertisers. Convinced by this experience that what one wants done well he must do himself, and having to unravel, tediously, the entanglements into which his partner had led their journal, Mr, Bryant made no further at- tempt at a tour of the old world till 1845, though in the meantime he visited various parts of his own country, including Florida and the Valley of the Mississippi. On his second voj-age to Europe he was ac- ^ companied by his friend, Mr, Charles M, Leupp, a wealthy merchant of this city and a connois- seur and patron of the fine arts. Edward Ever- | ett, who was then the American minister at the court of St. James, gave a breakfast in his honor, at which were present Thomas Moore, Kenyon, and Samuel Rogers, A friendship sprang up at once between Rogers and Bryant, which lasted until the death of the former. It began when Bryant remarked to the older poet that he had i brought a letter of introduction to him which he | would have the honor to present, and was inter- rupted by a kindly wave of the hand and the reply, " It is quite unnecessary, I have long known j-ou through your writings," These cordial words were followed by an invitation to breakfast with Rogers, which was promptly ac- cepted ; and at his friend's board he made the acquaintance of Poole, the author of " Paul Pry," Sir Charles Eastlake and Richard Moncton Milnes, now Lord Houghton. When he was about leaving England after this visit, Rogers bade him farewell with no little emotion, saying that they would never meet again. On his return a few years later he re- minded Rogers of this, " I remember it," was the answer; "I have no business here ; but I shall not stay long," This was indeed their last in- terview. It was not till after his second sojourn in Europe that Mr. Bryant set about the improvement of his newly purchased country house at Roslyn, L. I., now known as " Cedarmere." The building was put up in 178V by Richard Kirk, a Quaker, whose taste was satisfied with a simple square structure containing a number of large rooms. Under a later owner a portico was added, adorned with a heavy cornice and columns. When Mr, Bryant came into possession of the propertj^ he took away these sombre ornaments and filled their places with a lattice-work for training vines upon, threw out bay windows on either side, and added some irregular outbuildings. Thus it remains. Of late years, its owner has divided his summers between Roslyn and Cummington. entertaining his city friends, and taking an active part in both places in all the village enter- prises which look to the moral or intellectual cul- ture of the people. Voice and purse have always been enlisted without difiiculty in aid of any movement to better the condition of his " fellow townsmen" of a season, as the public institutions endowed by him in both places will testify. The Atlantic was crossed for the last time in the year 1867, but not until a more thorough acquaintance with the eastern half of this coun- try and with Cuba had been gained by a long and careful personal survey of them. Each of the foreign tours mentioned in this 26 sketch has borne abundant fruit for the public. Letters were sent from every important place to the Evening Post, and many of these were after- ward gathered into books for preservation ; but eveu more practical results may be found in the first suggestion of a great park for this city, a project conceived by Mr. Bryant during his earliest travels abroad, and taking shape, after many modifications, in the Central Park as we now have it. The site which commended itself to him at first was Jones's Woods; but this seemed for some reasons ineligible, and was re- linquished in favor of a point more easy of access from all parts of Manliattan Island. The nickel cent in our coinage owes its origin to a desire of Mr. Bryant's, after his first visit to Germany, to replace the old fashioned copper cent with something more nearly resembling the kreutzer. In the course of his long career as a jour- nalist and man of letters, the subject of this sketch was frequently called upon to de- liver addresses in memory of distinguished persons with whom lie bad been associated. The funeral of Cole, the artist, in 1848, was probably the first occasion of this sort. Four years later he delivered a discourse on the life and writings of James Fenimore Cooper, and in 1860 paid a like tribute to the departed Irving. At the ded- ication of the Morse, Shakspeare, Scott, Goethe and Halleck monuments in the Central Park, also, he was a prominent speaker. His last effort, as our readers know, was in honor of ]Mazzini, the Italian statesman. Beside the editions of his poems which have already been named in this article there was one entitled "The Fountain and Other Poems," pub- lished in 1842; and another in 1844, under the title, "The White-Footed Deer and Other Poems." In 1846 all his poems were collected and printed in Philadelphia in handsome style, with illustra- tions by the artist Leutze. In 1855, a two vol- ume edition appeared; in 1863, the "Thirty Poems" latest produced by his pen; in 1870, his translation of the Iliad, and in 1871, the Odys- sey; and in 1876, a very fine illustrated edition brought his poetical works down to that date. His letters from foreign parts have appeared under the titles, " LetAcrs of a Traveller" and " Letters from Spain," with the exception of those written from Mexico in the winter of 1871-2' The latest prose work which bears his name is a " History of the United States," now in course of publication. Though often solicited, Mr. Bryant steadily re- fused to accept any public office higher than that of Justice of the Peace, save the purely honorary one of Presidential Elector in 1860. He was once offered a place on the Board of Regents of the University, but declined it. Presidents Lincoln and Grant are said also to have mentioned his name in connection with important foreign mis- sions, but he could not be induced to permit the nomination to come before the Senate. Retiring in disposition even to the point of bashfulness, he avoided notoriety of all sorts, and until within comparatively recent years fled from every danger of "lionizing." When he was at last forced to submit to the popular de- mand and appear as the chief figure on occasions of social importance, he used to surprise all ob- servers by the diffidence with which he met the well-intended but often effusive advances of strangers, and the joy he would manifest at com- ing again into the narrow circle of personal friendship and out of the noise of the crowd. In 1864, the Century Club, of which he was one of the earliest members, celebrated the seven- tieth anniversary of his birth with a festival, the proceedings of which were published in a little volume. In 1874, the entire press of the country united with the citizens of New York in another birthday celebration, whose chief outcome was the presentation to the aged poet, two years af- terward, of a beautiful silver vase, now in the possession of the Metropolitan Museum of Art. On these occasions were quoted b}^ many a tongue and pen the well-known lines of Halleck's, as beautifully true to-day as when their author first committed them to paper : " Bryant, whose songs are tboughte that bless The heart— its teacher and its Joy, As Mothers blend with their caress Lessons of truth and gentleness And virtue for the listening boy. Spring's lovelier flowers for many a day Have blossomed on his wandering way, Beings of beauty and decay. Thev slumber in their autumn tomb; But those that gra(;ed his own Green River And wreathed the lattice of his home, Charmed by his song from mortal doom, Bloom on, and will bloom on forever." THE MAN OF LETTERS. By Edmund Clarence Stedman. I. The general pause and hush, in this reanimate season, show us how deep and positive is the feeling created by the loss of such a man as William Cullen Bryant. Not a feeling of unex- pectedness, though it well might be — for so live and free from decrepitude his old age has seemed, that we thought a deity more potent than Aurora had bestowed upon him the gift of immortality without decay. Not of sorrow, for he lived be- yond the usual range of life, and long has been among us like one already transfigured. Not the feeling which arises when some man of rank, office, entanglement in great affairs, suddenly has passed away ; no vast disturbance in matters of national or civic moment is caused by his de- parture, nor of this could it be said that we found our lares shivered on the hearth. — " The roof-tree fallen,— all That could affright, appall 1" Yet the position of Bryant was absolutely unique, and his loss is something strange and positive. No other man could die for whose sake might be revived so aptly that Indian meta- phor of the sound of the fall of a great oak in the still forest. He stood alone ; in some respects an incomparable figure. He grew to be not only a citizen, journalist, thinker, poet, but the beautiful, serene, majestic ideal of a good and venerable man. The purpose of this article is to seek for a general estimate of his literary character and services. "With these, and the acts of his life, the public is familiar as with the pictures of an open gallery. A hundred pens are transcribing the record. His countrymen long have delighted to honor him, one and all. But every life, grand or little, has in the end a meaning, an essential quality of its own. To discover this, with the passing of such a writer as Bryant, the offices of the critic are called forthwith into service. He is at his post, and of counsel for the inheritors ; since, when poets and thiakers die, they, like the Caesars, make the people at large their heirs. And in the present exercise of his office, the critic, however sudden the call, well may be more clear and settled in judgment than when regard- ing others whose work was long since ended. For the writer we now mourn has been before the world from a time near the beginning of the cen- tury, and so changeless through all changes that in estimating the poet just dead we really are judging the poet of fifty years ago, and scarcely are attempting to forecast the verdict of time upon his gift and its manifestations. II. Howsoever this and that writer may differ be- tween themselves as to the measure of Bryant's faculties, and of Bryant the man, one thing is sure: — no ordinary personage can gain and re- tain to the last so extraordinary a hold upon human interest, affection, reverential esteem. Others, endowed with length of years, have had their rise and decline, outlasting themselves, and finding occasion to declare with Cato Major, " It is a hard thing, Romans, to render an account before the men of a period different from that in 28 which one has lived !" But here was one who, by that subtle process through which certain men come at the end even more fully to their own, steadily grew to be the individual emblem of our finest order of citizensliip, possibly its rarest and most acceptable t3'pe. This, as constantly was evident, became impressed even upon coarse and ordinary persons, singly or associated in office, — scarcely judges, one would think, of such a mat- ter, but accepting without cavil the popular con- ception and the estimate of the thoughtful and refined. Now, there is sound reasoning at the base of every sustained opinion of this sort. What thing gave Bryant just this shade of special emi- nence ? Not alone that he was a wise, good, virtuous man ; not that he was a patriot, in the deepest and broadest sense ; not that he was a journalist, however strong and notable ; not merely that he was a clear and vigorous writer or original sayer and thinker ; nor even because he was a serene and reverend old man, most sound of body and mind. True he was all these, and in their combination occupied a rank excelled by none and attained only by the excepted few. But be3'ond and including all these he was a poet. To the lasting praise and glory of the art of song it may be said that being an American of those distinguished attributes, the superaddition of the poetic gift made him a bright particular star. Above all, then, it is as a poet that we should observe and estimate him. In what did the quality and limitations of his poetic genius consist ? Yet again, in order justly to answer this ques- tion, he must be studied not only as an American poet who represents his country and his time, but as a man who represents himself. With re- spect to the former, he cannot but represent tliem. But the critic is wrong who asserts that a poet can do no more. He can mould them, certainly can anticipate them and even prophesy of their future ; furthermore, he may express his own nature and originality in a way differing from theirs, in some fashion to which they have not yet attained. And in this wise first seeking a key to his poetic value, we say that he had grown to be a most satisfying type of our ideal citizen, joining for us the traditional gravity, purity and patri- otic wisdom of the forefathers with the modern- ness and freshness of our own day. His life, public and private, was in exact keeping with his speech and writings. We often say of a poet or artist that he should not be judged like other men by his outward irrelevant mark or habitude; that to see his best, his truest self, you must read his poem or study his paintings. But in reading Br3'ant's prose and verse, and in observing the poet himself, our judgments were the same. Al- ways he held in view liberty, law, wisdom, piety, faith ; his sentiment was unsentimental ; he never whined or found fault with condition or nature ; he was virile but not tyrannical ; frugal, but not too severe ; grave, yet full of shrewd and kindly humor. Absolute simplicity characterized him. Ethics were always in sight. He was a stoic in the generous, Christian meaning of the term, his bearing in our modern life being somewhat com- parable to that of Antoninus in the antique. He was, indeed, an " old man for counsel ;" what he learned in youth from the lives and precepts of Washington, Hamilton and their compeers, that he taught and practised to the last. His intel- lectual faculties, like his physical, were balanced to the discreetest level, and this without abasing his poetic fire. His genius was not shown by the advance of one faculty and the impediment of others ; it was the spirit of an even combination, and a fine one. It seemed as if it was with a gracious and in- stinctive sense of the fitness of things that he latterly bore his picturesque and stately part in the festivals and processions of our social life. To this extent he was conventional, but he made conventionalism itself imaginaJve and the renewer of thought and art. III. Here, then, has gone from us a minstrel who, in appearance, more than others of a strictly lyrical genius, was the very semblance of the legendary bard of Gray : "The poet stood (Loose his beard and hoary hair Streamed, like a meteor, to the troubled air), And with a master's hand and prophet's fire. Struck the deep sorrows of his lyre !" 29 Look at the extent of the period through which he flourished. He began in the early springtime of Wordsworth, and long outlived new men like Baudelaire and Poe. The various epochs of his career do not affect this examination of its pro- duct, which, after his escape from the manner of Pope, was of an even quality during seventy years. In this he was fortunate and unfortunate. The former, because his early pieces were so noteworthy that, in the dearth of A.merican poetry, they at once became home classics for a homely people ; they passed into the few school readers then compiled, and one generation after another learned them admiringly by heart. At this time, even though composed in the latter- day fashion and of equal merit with Bryant's, an author's pieces might not obtain for him such recognition of fame. But his genius, owing to this otherwise good fortune, worked under re- strictions from which it never was measurably freed. These we presently shall consider. Mean- time it again may be noted that his poetic career had neither rise, height, nor decline. He formed certain methods wholly natural to him in early youth, and was at once as admirable a poet as he ever afterwards became. Throughout his prolonged term of life he sang without haste or effort and always expressed himself rather than the varying theories of the time. From the outset he was in full sympathy with the aspect, feeling and aspirations of his own land and people. His tendency and manner were determined during the idyllic period of this Re- public, when nature, and the thoughts which she suggested, were themes for poets, rather than the dramatic relations of man with man. His senti- ment was afi'ected by the meditative verse of Cowper and "Wordsworth, who rose above didac- ticism, or made it etherial and imaginative by rare poetic insight. Emerson said of Bryant, when the Century Association met to celebrate the latter's seventieth year, " This native, origi- nal, patriotic poet. I say original : I have heard liim charged with being of a certain school ; I heard it with surprise, and asked, what school ? For he never reminded me of Goldsmith, or Words- worth, or Byron, or Moore. I found him always a true painter of the face of this country, and of the sentiments of his own people." This is finely said, and in a sense true ; yet there can be little doubt that in some respects Wordsworth was the master of his youth. All pupils must acknowl- edge masters at the beginning, but Murillo was Murillo none the less, although he ground colors for Castillo and studied with Velasquez. Bryant, it is true, ground his colors in the open air. His originality consisted in deriving from his studies a method natural to his own genius and condi- tion. And it is of interest to recall that the elder Dana describes him as saying that, " upon open- ing Wordsworth, a thousand springs seemed to gush up at once in his heart, and the face of Na- ture of a sudden to change into a strange fresh- ness and life." Certainly he was not cradled into poetry by wrong, nor perturbed by the wild and morbid passions of a wayward youth. We can imagine him a serious and meditative lad, direct- ed by the guidance of a scholarly father, well versed in the favorite poets of that day. Pope, Thomson, Akenside, Cowper — and at first accept- ing them as models ; finally, obtaining for him- self the clues to a true perception of nature, and with his soul suddenly exalted by a sense of her " something far more deeply interfused." His blood was stirred by the landscape, throughout the changing year, of the pastoral region of Massachusetts in which he had his growth. Three of Hugo's works illustrate the three grand conflicts by which man progress- es to his enfranchisement — conflicts with na- ture, tyranny and society. From the second of these opponents our fathers fled to a new continent, choosing to found a nationality, and entering upon that primeval conflict with nature which to an already civilized people is not without its compensation. It results, like a quar- rel between generous lovers, with a betrothal of the one to the other, and of such an alliance Bryant was our high-priest. The delights of nature, and the awe and mystery of life and death, withdrew him from the study of the indi- vidual world. Thus he became a philosophic minstrel of the woods and waters, the foremost of American landscape-poets. In the contact with primeval nature, man signalizes his victories by educating and rendering more beautiful his captive ; she, in turn, gains a potent influence over him, for a long while driving her rivals from 30 his heart, and compels him in his art and song to express her features and her inspiration. There- fore the first enduring American school of paint- ing was a landscape school, and only at this moment are we groping our way to an idyllic, then to a more dramatic, method in art. There is a sweet analogy between the poetry of Bryant and the broad, cool canvas of the founders of our landscape school — the works of Durand, Cole, Kensett, Inness, various as they may be in depth, tranquility, or imaginative power — such a harmony as exists between the soil, the climate, the fauna and the flora of an isothermal zone. There can be no doubt that Bryant, who at once became eminent in his special walk, therein has excelled, has outlasted, and will outlast, all his compeers and follow- ers. Others group together details, compose with true enthusiasm, but are deficient in tone, sentiment, imaginative receptivity. Tone is the one thing needful to a true interpretation of nature. Thoreau felt this when he wrote in his diary: " I have just heard the flicker among the oaks on the hillside ushering in a new dynasty. * * Eternity could not begin with more se- curity and momentousness than the Spring. All sights and sounds are seen and heard both in time and eternity ; and when the eternity of any sight or sound strikes the eye and ear, they are intoxicated with deliglit. * * * It is not im- portant thai the poet should say some par-ticular thing, hut that Ice should speak in harmony with nature. The tone and pitch of his voice is the main thing." It is true that Bryant is, in one respect, unmodern. Thoreau, despite his own language, caught and observed every detail. Our poet's learning was not scientific ; he lacked the minor vision which, an added gift, makes Tennyson and others give such charm and variety to their work. The ancients knew fewer colors than ourselves. Byron, among moderns, painted nature in her simple, broad manifesta- tions— the sea, the mountains, the sky — subor- dinating her spirit to his own passion, as Bryant allies it with his own tenderness and wisdom, — but even he was not her poet in the delicate, mi- crocosmic, recent sense. Both certainly lacked the exact cleverness and infinite variety of the new school. Bryant regarded nature in its phe- nomenal aspect, careless of scientific realities. What he gained in this wise was the absence of disillusionizing fact, and a fuller understanding of the language of nature's " visible forms ; " what he lost was the wide and various range opened by the endless avenues of new-found truth. IV. And right here it is well for us to observe the limitations of his genius as a poet: limitations so well-defined as to be a stumbling-block in the way of those who lightly examine it, and some- times to have thrown him out of the sympathetic range of elegant and impartial minds. His longevity was not allied with intellectual quick- ness and fertility, but seemed almost to be the physiological result of inborn slow- ness and deliberation. He was not flexible, facile of ear and voice. He con- sorted with nature in its still or majestic moods, and derived wisdom and refreshment from its tenderness and calm. His genius, as express- ed by its product, was not affluent, and scarcely availed itself of his length of years. His reticence in verse seemed habitual. In old age, poets are apt to write the most, and often to the least ad- vantage, but his pen through much of this period was chiefly devoted to translation. How little of his own poetry he produced in seventy years ! A few thin volumes. Think of Milton, Landor, Wordsworth, Tennj^son, Hugo, Longfellow — of the impetuous work of Scott and Byron — of what Shelley, who gave himself to song, accomplished before he died at twent3'-nine, Bryant was thought to be cold, if not severe, of temperament. The most fervent social passions of his song are those of friendship, of filial and fraternal love ; his intellectual passion is always under re- straint, even when moved by patriotism, liberty, religious faith. There is still less of action and dramatic quality in his verse. Humor, the overflow of strength, is almost absent from it, or, when present, sufficiently awkward ; yet it should be noted that in conver- sation, or in the after-dinner talks and speeches so frequent in his later years, his humor was continuous and charming — full of kindl}^ gossip, wisdom and mirth. He made, as we have seen, little advance upon the early standard of his 81 work. It would seem as if, under the lessons of a father, " who taught him the value of correct- ness and compression, and enabled him to dis- tinguish between poetic enthusiasm and fustian,'" he there and then matured, reached a certain point, and became set and stationary. There are few notable expressions and separable lines in his poetry. Finally, it has been observed that his diction, when not confined to that Saxon Eng- lish at every man's use, is somewhat bald and didactic, — always admirable and sententious, but less frequently rich and full. He had a limited vocabulary at command ; I should think that no modern poet, approaching him in fame, has made use of fewer words. His range is like that of Goldsmith, restricted to the simpler phrases of our tongue. Other poets, of an equally pure dic- tion, show here and there, by rare and fine words, the extent of their unused resources, and that they voluntarily confine themselves to " the strength of the positive degree." In the face of all this, Bryant's poetry has had, and will continue to have, a lasting charm for many of the noblest minds. Since this is not due to his length of years — for he is not alone in that possession — nor to richness of detail and imagery — nor because, like Whittier, he has adapted himself to successive changes of thought and diction, — how is it that his genius triumphs over its confessed limitations ? To understand this, his poetry must be judged as a whole, and not by its affluence or flexibility ; and it is, we say, eminently of that kind which must be studied in connection with its author's surround- ings and career. Be it again remembered, that he was the crea- ture of our early period. He did not give him- self to poetry, but added poetry to his allotted life and habitude. The reverse of this, only, can make the greatest poet. Art is a jealous mistress. His lack of devotion to her was the fault of his time, and of circumstances which decided his course in life. To him the parting of the ways came early ; and what was there in our literary atmosphere and opportunities, sixty years ago, to make a poet for life of any thorough-trained, aspiring and resolute man ? The nation called for workers, journalists, practical teachers. If, after accomplishing their daily tasks, they found time to sing a song, it thanked them and did lit- tle more. Poetry was the surplusage of Bryant's labors, or, more likely, their restoring comple- ment. Possibly, the beauty of his rarest nature would not have expressed itself in song but for the influence of those early readings under a dis- cerning father's care. Otherwise, though he could not have failed to become a writer, as a poet he might have been one of those mute oracles whose lot was mourned by Wordsworth : " OL ! many are the poets that are 80wn By Nature ; men endowed with highest gifts. The vision and the faculty divine ; Yet wanting the accomplishment of verse, Which, in the docile season of their youth, It was denied them to acquire." But read " The Evening Wind," see him in his most spontaneous mood, and you feel that, once having learned the art of verse^ all the poet within him thereafter must break out from time to time in song. He did not hoard his reputation. But his passion and tenderness did not so readily force him to metrical expression as a feebler amount of either forces many a lesser but more facile singer trained in a less rude and unpoetic age. On the other hand, he never, by any chance, afi"ected passion or set himself to artificial song. He had the triple gift of Athene, " self-reverence, self-knowledge, self-control." He was incapable of afi"ecting raptures that he did not feel, and this places him far above a host of singers who, with- out knowing it, hunt for themes and make poetry little better than a trade. As for his diction, he began when there was no feast of Pentecost with its gift of tongues. I think that the available portion of a poet's vocabulary is that which he acquires in youth, during his formative period. Is it harder for an adult to learn a foreign lan- guage than to enlarge greatly his native range of words, and have them at every-day command ? Bryant's early reading was before the great revi- val which brought into use the romance-words of Chaucer, Spencer, and the Elizabethan age. It was chiefly derived from the poorest, if the smoothest, English period — that which began with Pope and ended with Cowper. The possibilities of a wider training are visible in Tennyson, who had Keats 32 and Shelley for his predecessors ; not to consider | Swinburne, who, above his supernatural gifts of rhj'thm and language, owes much to his youthful explorations in classic and continental tongues. No doubt Brj-ant's models confirmed his natural restrictions of speech. But even its narrow range has made his poetry strong and pure ; and now, when expression has been carried to its extreme, it is an occasional relief to recur to the clearness, to the exact appreciation of words, discoverable in every portion of his verse and prose. It is i like a return from a florid renaissance to the ear- liest antique ; and indeed there was something ! Doric in Bryant's nature. His diction, like his thought, often refreshes us as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land. He refused to depart from what seemed to him the natural order of English verse, that order which comes to the lips of childhood, and is not foreign to any life or age. The thought was like the measure, that which was old with the fathers, and is young in j our own time, the pure philosophy of nature's i lessons. Give his poems a study, and their sim- plicity is their charm. How easy it seems to | write those natural lines ! Yet it is harder than i to catch a hundred fantastic touches of word- | painting and dexterous sound. He never was obscure, because he dared not and would not go beyond his proper sight and knowledge, and this was the safeguard of his poetry, his prose, and of his almost blameless life. ! His work is the reverse of "art for art's sake," — which too often bears to "art for ex- pression's sake" the relation of "literary paint- ing" to the painting which is executed with a master hand and eye. Verse, to Bryant, was the outflow of his deepest emotions ; a severe taste and discreet temperament made him avoid the study of decoration. Thus, he was always direct and intelligible, and appealed to the com- mon people as strongly as to the select few. I have compared him to our stately men of an older time. Among others, Webster might be mentioned as one whose mood and rhetoric are in keeping with the poetry of Bryant. Like Webster, our poet always selected the leading, essential thought, and brushed the rest aside. This he put in with a firm and glowing touch. Many have thought the works of both the states- man and the poet conventional, but to all simple and essential truth and diction, the adjective might be brought to apply. Adopting Arnold's distinction, we see that Bryant's simplicity was not simpleaae, but, simplicite. Everett pointed to the fact, that poetry, at its best, is " easily intelli- gible, touching the finest chords of taste and feeling, but never striving at eff"ect. This is the highest merit in every department of literature, and in poetry it is well called inspiration. Sur- prise, conceit, strange combinations of imagery and expression, may be successfully managed, but it is merit of an inferior kind. The beautiful, pathetic and sublime, are always simple and nat- ural, and marked by a certain serene uncon- sciousness of effort." " This," he added, " is the character of Mr. Bryant's poetry." VI. Let us again, then, observe its forms and themes, and discover clues to the essential quali- ty of the genius which idealized them. Bryant's chosen measures were very few and simple. Two were special favorites, most frequently used for his pictures of nature and his meditations on the soul of things, and in their use he was a master. One is the iambic-quatrain, in octo-syllabic verse, of which the familiar stanza, " Truth crushed to earth will rise again," may be recalled as a specimen. Many of his best modern pieces are composed in this measure, so evenly and firmly that the slightest change would mar their sound and flow. " A Day Dream," written in the poet's old age, is perfect of its kind, and may rank with Collins's nonpareil, " To fair Fidele's Grassy Tomb." Witness such stanzas as these : «« I sat and watched the eternal flow Of those smooth billows toward the shore, While quivering lines of light below Ran with them on the ocean-flow." * * * * •• Then moved their coral lips ; a strain Low, sweet, and sorrowful, I heard, As if the murmurs of its main Were shaped to syllable and word." His variations upon the iambic quatrain, as in the celebrated poems, "To a Waterfowl," and " The Past," are equally successful. The second of the poems referred to is that blank-verse in which his supremacy always was recognized. 33 Several distinct phases of our grandest English measure have been observed in literature. 1. The Elizabethan, free and current, matchless for dramatic verse; 2. The Miltonic, or Anglo-Epic, in which Latin words and sonorous pauses and inversions are so frequent ; 3. The Reflective, of w^hich Wordsworth, succeeding the didacticians, held unquestioned control ; 4. That of Tennyson, by turns epic and idyllic, combining Saxon strength and sweetness with a Greek heroic quality. Bryant's blank-verse may be numbered with the third of these classes, but from the outset was marked by a quality unquestionably his own. The essence of its cadence, pauses, rhythm, should be termed American, and it is the best ever written in the new world. Blank- verse is the easiest and the most difficult of all measures ; the poorest in poor hands ; the finest, when written by a true poet. Whoever essays it is a poet disrobed; he must rely upon his natural gifts, his defects cannot be hidden. But in this measure Bryant was at his height, and owes to it the most enduring portion of his fame. However narrow his range, we must own that he was first in the first. He reached the upper air at once in " Thanatopsis," and again and again, though none too frequently, he renewed his flights, and, like his own waterfowl, " pursued his solitary way." The finest and most sustained of his poems of nature are those written in blank verse. At in- tervals, so rare throughout his life as to resemble the seven-year harvests, or the occasional wave that overtops the rest, he composed a series of those pieces which now form a unique panorama of nature's aspects, moving to the music of lofty thoughts and melodious words. Such are " A Winter Piece," the " Inscription for the Entrance to a Wood," "A Forest Hymn," " Summer Wind," " The Prairies," " The Fountain," " Hymn of the Sea," '"A Rain-Dream ;" also a few written late in life, showing that the eye of the author of "Thanatopsis" had not been dimmed nor his natural force abated, — these are "The Con- stellations, " The Night Journey of a River," and " Among the Trees." In all the treatment is large and ennobling, and distinctly marks each as Bryant's. The method, that of invocation, somewhat resembles the manner of Coleridge's I " Hymn to Mont Blanc ;" when in a less enrap- tured strain, they exhibit repose, feeling, wise and reverent thought. In the same eloquent, sonorous verse, and with like caesural pauses and inflections, we find his more purely meditative poems, upon an equal or still higher plane of feeling. " Thanatopsis," the " Hymn to Death," " Earth," " An Evening Revery," "The Antiquity of Freedom," and one of his latest and longest, " The Flood of Years," Yet, in both his reflective verse and that devoted to nature, he often employed lyrical measures with equal excellence ; as in the breezy, ex- quisite poem on * ' Life," " The Battle Field," "The Future Life, aod "The Conqueror's Grave" — the latter one of his most elevating pieces. Especially in his lyrics he seemed like a wind-harp yielding tender music in response to every suggestion of the great mother whom he loved. Here he becomes one with her, and with all her moods and " visible forms." Such lyrics as " June," " The Death of the Flowers," and " The Evening Wind," show this, and also indicate the limits within which his song was spontaneous. Each is the genuine ex- pression of a personal mood, and has by actual merit taken a permanent place in metrical litera- ture. VII. At last, then, we are brought to a recognition of the power in Bryant's verse which has given him a station in the poetic hemicycle far above that which he could hope to win by its amount or range. It is the elemental quality of his sons^. ^^ike the bards of old, his spirit delights in fire, air, earth, and water, — the apparent structures of the starry heavens, the mountain recesses, and the vasty deep. These he apostrophizes, but over them and within them he discerns and bow^s the knee to the omniscience of a protecting Father, a creative God. Poets, eminent in this wise, have been gifted always with imagination. The verse of Bryant often is full of high imaginings. Select any portion of "Thanatopsis:" " Pierce the Barcan wilderness, Or lose thyself in the continuous woods, Where rolls the Oregon, and hears no sound Save his own dashings— yet the dead are there !" or this, from " The Prairies :" 34 " The bee ******** Fills the savannas with his murmurings, And hides his sweets, as in the golden age. Within the hollow oak. I listen long To his domestic hum, and think I hear The sound of an advancing multitude Which soon shall fill these deserts. From the ground Comes up the laugh of children, the soft voice Of maidens, and the sweet and solemn hymn Of Sabbath worshippers. The low of herds Blends with the rustling of the heavy grain Over the dark-brown furrows. All at once A fresher wind sweeps by and breaks my dream, And I am in the wilderness alone." Read the entire poem of " Earth," Then such a stanza as this, from " The Past " : " Far in thy realm withdrawn Old Empires sit in suUenness and gloom, And glorious ages gone Lie deep within the shadow of thy womb. " Such a phrase as "Old Ocean's gray and melancholy waste;" or, from " A Rain-Dream, " an impersonation of "The Wind of Night, A lonely wanderer between Earth and cloud, In the black shadow and the chilly mist, Along the streaming mountain-side, and through The dripping woods, and o'er the plashy fields, Roaming and sorrowing still, like one who makes The journey of life alone, and nowhere meets A welcome or a friend, and stili goes on In darkness." Take passages like these — and they are frequent in Bryant's poetry — make allowance for the law by which any real poet's work is sure to grow upon us in close examination, and we still are confronted with an "elemental" imagination often higher than that of more productive poets. Younger singers excel in richness of phrase, redundant imagery, elaborate word-painting ; but every period has its forerunners and masters, and our rising men must acknowledge Bryant as a laurelled master of the early American School. 1 le seldom touched the keys, yet they gave out an organ tone. Indeed, when he essayed piano-music, and was in a light or fanciful mood, he often was unable to vie with sprightlier and defter hands. His epics in swift and simple measures had a ringing (jualit}', noticeable in "The Song of Marion's Men ", the best of them — and in " The Hunter of the ]*rairies". A blithe surprise awaits us in certain later pieces, such as " The Planting of the Apple-Tree," the delicate " Snow-Shower," and "Robert of Lincoln" — so full of bird-music and fancy. Usually, as we have seen, it was with an air of uncouthness and doubt that he ventured beyond established precedents, as if he were in strange waters and would gladly touch firm land, — but then, he seldom ventured. As he grew older, beyond the asperities of life, he became less brooding, sad and grave. His fancy, what there was of it, came in his later years, and suggested two of his longest pieces, " Sella " and "The Lit- tle Children of the Snow," tales of folk-lore, in which his lighter and more graceful handling of blank-verse may be studied with pleasure. vni. In nothing was his wise self-judgment more evident — his exact measure of a prolonged men- tal and physical strength — than in the task of translating the epics of Homer, to which he suc- cessfully applied himself in his old age. The power that accomplished this was as wonderful as Landor's retention of creative energy. The limits of this paper will not permit of an analysis of this heroic performance. Some years ago, the present writer prepared an extended review of it for The Atlantic Monthly, in which its lead- ing qualities were thought to be : First. Fidelity to the Homeric text ; Second. The admirable manner in which the translator's characteristic blank-verse was sustained, with an increased ele- ment of flexibility, and without artifice, to the end of the long, immortal poems. It also was said that a demand for such a blank-verse rend- ering of Homer had existed previously, which not even Cowper had been able to meet. Lord Derby had failed from utter lack of the poetic gift. But the noblest blank-verse translation, even Bryant's, faithful as it was and in the grand manner, must lack the Homeric rush and swift- ness, and must also become prosaic in its substi- tutes for the recurrent and connecting phrases of the Greek text. The conclusion was that no new English Homer would " tread upon the renown of Bryant's crowning work, until the English hexa- meter— with all its compensating qualities, by which alone we can preserve delicate shades of 35 meaning and the epic movement — has been firmly established among us, and a great poet, imbued with the classical spirit, has become its acknowledged master. Until then Bryant's translation has filled the literary void." The writer has seen no reason to change this estimate of the unequalled merits, and of what were the essential and unavoidable deficiencies, of Bryant's Homeric work. The tendency of his mind, even in its epic mood, was slow and stately, Latin rather than Greek. Hence, as a translator from the Spanish he was peculiarly successful, repro- ducing the calm and royal quality of Castilian song. American j)oets — with pride be it remembered — ever have been true to their own land in express- ing its innate freedom, patriotism, aspiring re- solve. Throughout Bryant's life his scattered poems upon political events, at home and abroad, have been consecrated to freedom and its devotees. He breathed a spirit of independence with the wind of his native hills. The country is the open wild of liberty. All our poets of nature are poets of human rights. Should America ever become monarchical it will be due to the influence of cities and those bred in them. Bryant's regard for law, for the inheritance of just political and social systems, was unquestionable. He might have been a constitutionalist in France ; here, though bred a federalist, he was sure to oppose undue centralization. After all, he was of no party further than he conceived it to be right. Witness his contest with slavery and his desertion of a democracy which finally, he thought, belied its name. That he did not, with Longfellow and Whittier, summon his muse to oppose the greatest wrong of our history was owing to two causes: First, it was his lyrical habit to observe and idealize general principles, the abstract rather than the concrete. Whittier's poems are alive with incident, and burn with personal feeling. Once, only, Bryant wrote a mighty poem on Slavery : when it had received its death-blow, when the struggle ended, and the right prevailed. Jehovah had conquered. His children were free, and Bryant raised a chant like that of Miriam : " O, thou great Wrong, that, through the slow-paced years I Didst hold thy millions fettered; , * * * * ♦ * * " Go, now, accursed of God, and take thy place With hateful memories of the elder time ! * ****** •* Lo ! the foul phantoms, silent in the gloom Of the flown ages, part to yield thee room." This swelling poem, " The Death of Slavery," was not needed to assure us that the cause of freedom touched his heart. For, secondly, his true counterpart to Whittier's work was to be found in the vigorous anti-slavery assaults he made for years in the journal of which he died the editor. There it was that he wreaked his influence and mental power upon "the rebuke of fraud and oppression of whatever clime or race." His prose labors were an outlet, constantly aff"orded in his journalism, through which much of that energy escaped which otherwise would have varied the motives and increased the body of his song. It was in every way as perfect as his verse, as clearly prose as that was poetry. Few better writers of simple, nervous Eng- lish, His phraseology was a well of Eng- lish undefiled. He used it for half a century as the instrument of his every-day thought and purpose ; as a leader-writer, a trav- eller and correspondent, an essayist and orator, a political disputant. His polemic vigor and acerbity were worked off in his middle-life edi- torials, and in defence of what he thought to be right. There he was indeed unyielding, and other pens recall the traditions of his political controversies. He never confused the distinct provinces of prose and verse. Refer to anything written by him, of the former kind, and you find plainness, virility, well-constructed syntax, free from any cheap gloss of rhetoric or the "jingle of an effeminate rhythm." For example, the pre- face to his " Library of Poetry and Song." This is a model of expressive English prose, as simple as that of the Spectator essayists and far more to the purpose. Like all his productions, it ends when the writer's proper work is done. The es- say, it may be added, contains in succinct lan- o-uage the poet's own views of the scope and method of song, a reflection of the instinct gov- erning his entire poetical career. As in written prose and verse, so in speech and 36 public offices. The long series of addresses on civic occasions closed with one which brought him to his death. Mastering his work, in its in- tegrity and brightness, to the very end, it was his lot at last to bow, as became a poet of Nature, before her own life-nurturing, life-destroying forces, and thus submit to her kindest universal law. The question of a passage in " An Even- ing Revery " is now answered, and the prophecy fulfilled : "0 thou great Movement of the Universe, Or Change, or Flight of Time— for ye are onel That bearest, silently, thy visible scene Into night's shadow and the streaming rays Of starlight, whither art thou bearing me ? I feel the mighty current sweep me on, Yet know not whither. Man foretells afar The courses of the stars ; the very hour He knows when they shall darken or grow bright Yet doth the eclipse of Sorrow and of Death Come unforewarned 1 " THE POET, By Richard Henry Stoddard. " Mr. Pope's father (who was an honest mer- chant and dealt in Hollands wholesale) was no poet, but he used to set him to make English verses when very young. He was pretty difficult in being pleased, and used to send him back to new turn them. ' These are not good rhymes ;' for that was my husband's word for verses." So wrote the Rev, Joseph Spence about a hundred and fifty years ago, taking down the words as they dropped from the garrulous lips of Pope's good old mother, who idolized her famous son. This little anecdote occurs to me in writing about Bryant's poetry, the cultivation of which was sedulously fostered by his father, who was a physician of repute and a gentleman of educa- tion and literary tastes. The childhood of Bryant was spent in the town of Curamington, where he was born, and where there must have been a good school, if it be true, as Dr, Griswoldsays, that he made very creditable translations from the Latin poets at the age of ten. If I knew what books the library of Dr. Bryant contained, I could, I think, readily detect the influences that moulded his juvenile compositions. I assume that Pope was among the English poets whom he possessed, and Gray, and possibly Cowper, who passed from this troubled scene of existence when Master Bryant was about six years old. If Dr. Bryant cared for the native muse, he possessed Freneau (of whose poetical works three editions were published before the completion of the first decade of the present century), Trumbull's " Mc- Fingal," Dwight's "Conquest of Canaan," and " Greenfield Hill" (which was published in the year that Bryant was born), and that once famous and speedily forgotten epic, Barlow's " Colum- biad." He could not have learned much from any American poet that had yet appeared. He might have learned something, however, from Freneau, who was a popular poet on account of the Revolution, whose most prolific singer he had been. Patriotic verse was highly thought of then, and to have written against the bold Briton was to have effected a lodgment in public esti- mation. One element which runs through Fre- neau's poetry was before long to crop out in young Bryant's poetry. I mean Freneau's recog- nition of the fact that there were many things in the life of the Indians which were legitimate themes for poetic meditation. What I mean will be apparent to my readers if they will turn to Griswold's " Poets and Poetry of America," and glance over Freneau's " Dying Indian" and " The Indian Burying Ground." I would advise them to read the last carefully, if only for the music, which I think influenced Bryant at a later period. Campbell thought so well of this poem that he conveyed a line of it into his " O'Connor's Child." Br3^ant could not have missed the Indian element if he had read Dwight's " Greenfield Hill," a de- scriptive, historical and didactic poem which is divided into seven parts, and which must be tedious reading, if I may judge by the extracts quoted by Griswold. This element, thickly coat- ed over with verbiage, informs a section of five stanzas descriptive of an Indian temple, and pads out a weak example of the noble measure of Spencer. Beside this measure and the sing-song 38 heroics of Pope, " Greenfield Hill " contains an example of American blank verse which is not to be commended. It is heavy, lumbering and unmusical. Bryant's first appearance in print, outside of the " Poets' Corner " of the Northampton news- paper which printed his translations from the Latin poets, was in a little pamphlet of political verse. I have never seen it, and consequently know nothing about it beyond what I find in Griswold and Duyckinck. It was entitled "The Embargo," and was published in 1808, his four- teenth year. Griswold calls it a satire, and says it was directed against President Jefferson, who was probably not injured by it. He quotes eighteen lines, descriptive of an old-time caucus, and considers them remarkably spirited and graphic, a commendation in which I cannot con- cur. They are a clever imitation of the average evenly balanced manner of Pope, w^ho was clearly the master to whom the young poet loo.ked for form, no doubt at the suggestion of his father. The little Queen Anne's man had long been de- tlironcd in England, but an old-fashioned country doctor in the northwest corner of Massachusetts was not sufficiently aware of that important fact in the history of English poetry. " The Embar- go " reached a second edition, which was publish- ed in Boston in 1809, and contained an endorse- ment of the youth of its writer, which had been called in question by the Monthly Anthology. It also contained some additional pieces of verse, one of which on " Drought " is quoted by Duyck- inck. It was written in Bryant's fifteenth year, and entirely from books. In other words, it is artificial, colorless, and of no poetical value. A great poet had been born in New England, but his first volume amounted to nothing, especially in the walk of song in which he was soon to be un- rivalled. If he saw nature, it was not with his natural sight, but through the spectacles of books, and not the best books in the library of his father, if its shelves were enriched, as I think they were, with Cowper. A single page of " The Task," if he had had it, would, I am per- suaded, have quickened his poetic vision, and revealed to him his intense love of the natural world. The life of Brvant when it is written will fill — at any rate it ought to fill — the intellectual blank which separates the publication of " The Embargo " from the writing of " Thanatopsis," I cannot fix the date of " Thanatopsis," nor the place where it was composed ; but trusting Gris- wold, who could have had no motive for inaccu- racy, it saw the light in manuscript shortl}- after Bryant had completed his eighteenth year. This young man in his nonage had done what many men never do at all — he had emancipated himself from books and models, and had discovered him- self and his own originality. What Pope had been to him the short extract from " The Em- bargo " quoted by Griswold shows. What Eng- lish poet inspired him next? One of the greatest of the moderns— "Words^vorth. Strictly speaking I should not say that Wordsworth was an inspira- tion to him, but rather a discovery. He foimd in the blank verse of Wordsworth the clue which conducted him into the profoundest recesses of his being — the sacred places where Meditation sits in darkness brooding over the solemn mysteries of life and death. The two volumes of Words- worth's "Lyrical BallaHs" were reprinted in Philadelphia in the eighth year of Bryant's age, but I doubt whether a copy of that edition found its way to Cummington, and. if one did, I am cer- tain that Dr. Bryant did not know what to make of it. Wordsworth did not write for gentlemen cultured as he was, but for unconventional minds like his own. The boy Bryant would have seen nothing remarkable in his poetry ; no boy, no young man has ever yet understood his serene and lofty genius. He touches, he moves no man until years have brought the philosophic mind. It comes to some early, to some late, to some not at all. It came to Bryant early, and it never left him. " Thanatopsis" struck the keynote of his genius, disclosed to him the growth and gran- deur of his powers, and placed him, for what he was, before all American poets, past, present and to come. " Thanatopsis ' is tome the most remarkable poem that was ever written by a young man. 1 know of nothing like it in English literature, nothing that is at once so grave, so sustained, so mature, and so universal. The feeling which per- vades it, the solemn reflection which inspires it, belongs to all liumanity and all time, and is 39 apart from and beyond all religions. The truth- ful lesson of the nothingness of life is the silent teaching of nature. It could not have been written in the Old World, where the conception of the poet would have been limited by circum- scribed areas of burial, and known periods of time. It demanded a New World, of vast dimen- sions and unknown antiquity, a primeval wilder- ness that was once populous with forgotten races of men. Such a world stretched from the shores of the Atlantic to those of the Pacific at the be- ginning of the present century, and waited for a poet to grasp the secret of its solitude. The little churchyard at Stoke Pogis inspired Gray's immortal " Elegy ;" the great tomb of man in the Xew World inspired Bryant's " Thanatopsis," which is larger than its inspiration, and, if a contemporary verdict is worth anything, will be as lasting as the language which it has enriched. " Thanatopsis" saw the light in print in the pages of the North American Review in 1817, but not entirely in the shape that we know it now. As I remember the first version, the first sixteen and the last fourteen lines were wanting : in other words, the poem began with the broken line, "Yet a few days, and thee," and ended with the broken line, " and make their bed with thee." As originally printed the poem opened with four four -line stanzas, which are far inferior to the solemn blank verse of which they were the pre- lude. They are as follows : " Not that from life and all its woes The hand of death shall set me free ; Not that this head shall then repose In the low vale most peacefully. " Ah, when I touch Time's farthest brink, A kinder solace must attend ; It chills my very soul to think On the dread hour when life must end. " In vain the flattering verse may breathe Of ease from pain, and rest from strife ; There is a sacred dread of death Inwoven with the strings of life. " This bitter cup at first was given, When angry justice frowned severe ; And 'tis the eternal doom of Heaven That man must view the grave with fear." If we did not know that "Thanatopsis" was the work of a young man, we would never guess that such was the fact, it is so serious, so elevated, 80 noble. Bryant rises to his theme, putting off at once and forever all immaturity and uncer- tainty of thought and expression, and speaks as one having authority. He is oracular in his knowledge of nature and her ministrations to man. She lives in his lines as in those of no other American poet, before or since. His lightest epithets are authentic, and his glances of obser- vation unerring. He takes in everything at once, settles the value of all things, and repro- duces a perfect whole, an imperative unity, large, imposing, imperishable. The blank verse of " Thanatopsis" is masterly and original ; I can trace the influence of no Eng- lish poet in its varied pauses and musical ca- dences. With the exception of " The Ages," which stands at the head of the collected edition of " Bryant's Poems," his poems are arranged in the order in which they were written. " Thana- topsis" was followed by the simple and charming lines to '* The Yellow Violet," the sentiment and melody of which are perfect. He returned then to his first love, blank verse, and wrote the fault- less " Inscription for the Entrance to a Wood, ' in which he changes the broad style, the grand manner of *' Thanatopsis," and descends to min- uter details which are exceedingly picturesque, and everywhere subordinated to the main effect. A skillful painter ought to be able to put this im- mortal Wood on canvas ; for it is already painted in words by a hand of a great master. Try to read any of Akenside's " Inscriptions " after this noble one and you will see how inferior they are. And they were once so famous ! A pretty melo dious " Song," of no great value, leads us to the unforgetable lines " To a Waterfowl," which were written, I imagine, on the seashore of Massachu- setts. They were published in the North American Review in 1818, six months after "Thanatopsis," and were immediately recognized as the work of ! a great poet. The moralizing stanza at the close added weight, with minds of a certain cast, to I the picturesque impressiveness of the poem. A ; comparison between the third line of the second I stanza as it was originally printed and as it j stands now is an instructive lesson in poetic art. I The first version reads : j "As darkly painted on the crimson sky Thy figure floats along." Perfect, sang the chorus of reviewers, and were wrong, as Bryant saw, for a painted figure can 40 neither float nor appear to float. The second ! version runs: " As darkly limned upon the crimson sky," wliich was open to the same objection as the first version. The line stands in the last edition : " As darkly seen against the crimson sky," j which is strictly true of a waterfowl floating | against a background of twilight. We come to minute picturesqueness in " Green River,'' and a lightness of touch we have never seen before. This poem is the most autobiogra- phic that Bryant has written, in that it ex- j presses his regret at his enforced absences from nature, and his dissatisfaction with the law, which was now his profession. " A Winter Piece " is doubly excellent — excellent as a leaf from the inner life of the poet, and excellent as a | picture of the woods at all seasons, and a positive picture of the woods in winter. The thirty-seven lines beginning, " Come -when the rains,'' are unequalled for brilliancy in the whole range of English poetr}-. " The West Wind " has no great value, although it is a pleasant lyric. " The Burial Place" is so good, that I wish Bryant had finished it, and taken the chances of being con- sidered a plagiarist from Irving, who was not to be named in the same day with him. The lyrics " Blessed are they that mourn," and " No man Knoweth his Sepulchre," are at once strong, compact and graceful, and in a style which is Bryant's own. "A Walk at Sunset" interests me greatly, partly on account of its revealment of Bryant's poetic personality, and partly be- cause it marks the appearance of a new element in his poetry, hints of which are to be found in Dwight's " Greenfield Hill," and in the "Indian Burying Ground" of Freneau — the element of In- dian life softened by the mists of antiquity and the haze of poetic imagination. "A Walk at Sunset" is an exquisitely tender picture of the Housatonic Valley as I have seen it on summer evenings at Stockbridge when it is 8uff"us