^g*W OF PBI/VCf^js Lo gical sttt ^ BS 13. Use of the Song in the Christian Church . . 82 vni CONTENTS. THE SONG OF SONGS. PAGE The Anticipation, i. 2 — n. 7 89 The Awaiting, n. 8 — in. * 121 The Espousal and its Results, in. G — v. I . . . . 139 The Absence, v. 2— S 191 The Presence, v. 9 — vni. 4 209 Love's Triumph, vni. 5 — 12 261 The Conclusion, vni. 13, 14 2v2 ; THE SOXG OF SOXGS. INTRODUCTION. § i. The Hebrew title of this Book is D*WTl W r\u?$P/ ")£?X Shir hash-shirim asher U-Shelomoh, E. V. ' : The Song of Songs, which is Solomon's." The authenticity of this title has been by many called in question on the ground that it contains the relative "lC?tf in its full and usual form, instead of the provincialism, archaism, vulgarism, or abbreviation, £?, which is uniformly employed throughout the Song it- self. But it can hardly be deemed unnatural that the idiom of the title should here not conform to that of the Song. And the argument to the prejudice of the title derived from this circumstance is more than counterbalanced by the argument for its authenticity furnished by the homoeophony of the words "It? tf and 1*W (asher and shir), homoeophony of a kind of which we have throughout the Song many examples (see on I. 3). 1 2 THE SONG OF SONGS. The earlier part of the title denotes " the best or most excellent of songs." The latter part has been almost universally under- stood as ascribing the authorship of the Song to Solo- mon; and it must be admitted, from a comparison of the superscriptions of the psalms, &c. that this is the obvious and j)rimd facie interpretation of its meaning. The internal evidence of the Song itself does not, however, when fairly weighed, confirm us in the conclu- sion that Solomon should be viewed as the author. We know, in the first place, that it has generally pleased God to set apart the fittest human instruments for the different branches of his earthly work. In most books of Scripture there is an evident native harmony between the prophet and the message which he was commissioned to deliver, between the writer and the theme which he was selected to illustrate. Does it then appear from all that can be gathered of the character of Solomon, that he was the man to whom the execution of the Song of Songs was likely to be divinely en- trusted ? Some qualifications for the task may indeed be fairly conceded to him. Such were his taste for the beauties of nature, and his scientific acquaintance with those na- tural objects, animate and inanimate, whence many of the images of the Song are drawn. Such also were his taste for all kinds of artificial magnificence, and the fa- miliarity with such magnificence which he was enabled to acquire by reason of the wealth at his command. On these points the upholders of the Solomonic author- INTRODUCTION. 6 sliip of the Song have with justice enlarged. Moreover the mention of his thousand and five songs attests his cultivated love of poetry, and especially of poetry allied to the Song of Songs by outward form. But it is otherwise when we pass from the outward form and imagery of the Song to its innermost essence. That essence is love : love in all its perfectness and purity. Such love there is no evidence that Solomon had been fitted by any training to appreciate. He was voluptuous, perhaps,, sensual; but there is nought in his history to shew that he ever loved chastely, or tenderly, or self-denyingly, or consistently, or even deeply. His principal marriage, that with Pharaoh's daughter, makes some figure in Scripture; but only so far as it there illustrates his splendour. As to its morality, it was certainly contracted in public violation of the Law of Moses; and that it was otherwise more commendable we have no warrant for assuming, no indication being given that it either originated in love, or terminated in happiness. Of his other love-relations, or quasi-love- relations, we are only informed in general terms, that he "loved many strange women" of the surrounding nations ; that, despite the Lord's commandment, he "clave unto them in love;" that he "had seven hun- dred wives, princesses, and three hundred concubines," and that they "turned away his heart;" and that he made provision for their various idolatries (1 Kings xi. 1 — 8). Doubtless we must not judge his multitude of wives from a Christian point of view. Polygamy pre- vailed more or less in ancient times, and there are not 1—2 4 THE SONG OF SONGS. wanting in the Old Testament examples, such as Abra- ham, of polygamists who gave proof of genuine conjugal attachment. Yet polygamy was always a dark cloud on the love-relation, a deep hindrance to love's unal- loyed purity. It terribly overshadowed the mutuality of the relations of the bridegroom and the bride, the " I am my beloved's and my beloved is mine," which the Song of Songs brings so emphatically before our gaze (ir. 16; VI. 3, &c). This being so, the allowance which we are bound to make for those who practised it cannot be fairly extended in all its fulness to those who first brought it into vogue; and for the like reason we can hardly acquit of personal hardness of heart the man who with unbridled excess increased his harem far beyond the limits generally observed by even Oriental princes. If critics had only refrained from surrounding Solo- mon's Egyptian marriage with a halo of bright fancies for which there is no scriptural warrant, and from con- necting, against all reason, with the person of the peace- ful Solomon the prophetical Psalm xlv, in which the Messiah appears not only as a bridegroom but also as a warrior, they would have seen how little foundation really exists for the hypothesis of that monarch's ability to depict the pure delights of holy bridal love. It is certainly not easily to be imagined that he in whom culminated the ancient disregard of the true and original position of woman as man's help meet and partner, should have been specially selected by the Holy Spirit of God to delineate, in all its delicacy and sacredness, that purest communion of love between Christ and his INTRODUCTION. O Church, of which natural love in its primeval innocency is the type. When moreover we find Solomon's ex- periences in connexion with earthly love pleaded as fitting him for the composition of the Song which we possess, one cannot help remarking how different his experiences from those of some of the foremost commen- tators on the Book, such, for instance, as Origen and Bernard ! But it will be asked, Why then should the Beloved of the Song be designated, as all allegorical interpreters admit to be the case, by Solomon's name? Can it be denied that King Solomon was the type whom the poet, in singing of the Beloved of the Church, had in view; that he haunted him as the shadow of that heavenly Bridegroom flitting beforehand across the stage of his- tory? To a certain extent, no doubt, the person of the historical Solomon was present to the poet's gaze. There were points of view from which Solomon had been a true and important type of Christ ; more espe- cially in respect of the peacefulness, the glory, and the wide dominion of his rule. It is to his royal splendour, to the peace with which his reign opened, to his appre- ciation of all that was outwardly attractive, and to the association of his name with some of the chief beauties of the land of Israel, that the poet has had regard in constituting him the typical figure around which all his conceptions of the future Redeemer should cluster. But this did not prevent him from introducing into his picture of that Redeemer elements which never in any wise belonged to Solomon. Accordingly the name b THE SONG OF SONGS. Solomon is, after all, used but sparingly throughout the Song. It is in fact peculiar to the two passages, in. 6 — 11, VIII. 11, 12, in which special prominence is given to those features of the .Redeemer's person and kingdom which had in Solomon been typified. Into the more direct love-passages of the Song Solomon's name enters not ; for indeed not only a greater than Solomon, but a purer than Solomon, is there. Let it not be deemed that aught that has been here advanced is intended to disparage the spiritual gifts which Solomon really possessed. It was for wisdom that he asked; and wisdom from on high doubtless God bestowed upon him in an eminent degree; wisdom such as that which shines in the inspired Proverbs, with their goodly stores of wholesome instruction. But in earlier equally as in later days men's gifts differed ac- cording to the grace that was given them; and there is no evidence in the Book of Proverbs that its author possessed all the qualifications demanded for the accom- plishment of a very different work. There are moreover other circumstances connected with the Song which militate against the current view of its authorship. It is certainly against it, so far as negative evidence may fairly carry weight, that notwith- standing sundry references to Jerusalem, together with one mention of the " daughters of Zion," there should be an entire absence of any allusion to Solomon's greatest and noblest architectural work, the Jewish temple. Reasons for this might possibly be found, and the argu- ment should not be pressed too far; but on the hypo- INTRODUCTION. 7 thesis of Solomon's authorship, the omission is at least remarkable. We need have less hesitation in relying on the argu- ment furnished by the way in which the mention of Jerusalem is coupled with that of Tirzah, vi. 4. How- ever beautiful its position, the only known importance which Tirzah possessed was that of being the residence, after the schism, of the earlier sovereigns of the king- dom of Israel. So long as it was a merely private city there would have been an obvious impropriety in put- ting it, even in imagery, on a level with Jerusalem. The Song cannot well be earlier in date than the period when Tirzah became a royal abode. We cannot how- ever fix the latest date for the composition of the Song at the exact period when the kings of Israel removed their residence from Tirzah to Samaria. The associa- tions of a capital city might hang for a time around it after its authoritative dignity had been transferred to a younger rival : it would not, for example, be derogatory to the array of modern capitals to place such a city as Moscow by their side. And we know from 2 Kings XV. 14 that what importance Tirzah possessed did not, after the removal of the capital to Samaria, altogether dis- appear. There are certain special passages of the Song, to be more fully considered in the commentary, which tend to throw light on the date at which it was really writ- ten. Particularly important here is the passage I. 5, from which it may be gathered that Jerusalem was no longer the religious metropolis of the whole Israelitish 8 THE SONG OF SONGS. nation. Some evidence, however subordinate, of a date posterior to Solomon may be supplied by what will be observed on iv. 4. To the same effect runs the evi- dence of II. 15: in the full tide of prosperity in Solo- mon's reign men troubled themselves but little with thinking of the foxes by whom the vineyard of Israel was ere long to be ravaged. Then again there is a melancholy tone about some parts of the Song, e. g. III. 1 — 5, which ill accords with the universal joyous- ness of the days of Solomon. These various considerations all point to the same general inference. The Song was written after the divi- sion of the kingdoms ; and most probably by a subject of the northern realm. It cannot be doubted by those who adhere to the church interpretation of the Song that the author was one, who, in spite of the political schism, preserved in its integrity his allegiance to the church of his forefathers, and of Solomon, and of David. But the circumstances of the times might well render unadvisable any allusion to the temple to which the Israelites no longer repaired ; nor indeed do we find any allusion ever made to it by the prophets Elijah and Elislia. The former observes the time of the evening sacrifice (1 Kings xvni. 36) ; but makes no mention of the place of it 1 . 1 It is a blot on Mendelssohn's great oratorio that the name Zion should appear in some of the passages of which the libretto is com- pacted ; a blot the mure t<> he regretted because of the great influence which that immortal work must, like the poetry of Milton, exert on men's views of the sacred themes of which it treats. The mission of Elijah was exclusively to the people of the ten tribes. INTRODUCTION. V It is also probable from the typical use which is made of the figure of Solomon, and of the evident respect which his memory commands, that the Song was not written in the first generations after his death, while his oppressions were still resented with bitterness. Some remarks are made by Renan on this subject, which are intended by him to support a very different conclusion : " Les mecontentements passagers qui re- sultent des depenses royales s'oublient vite ; bientot on ne voit plus que les monuments qui en restent, sans que Ton demande ce qu'ils ont coiite. Le souvenir des souffrances qui rendirent odieux au peuple le regne de Louis XIV. et firent insulter ses fune'railles fut bientot efface par l'impressiori gene"rale de grandeur que laissa son siecle et par les formules admiratives que les rhe- teurs mirent a la mode en parlant de lui. II en fut de riiume pour Salomon. Au moment de sa mort, on voit la haine contre son administration produire line revolu- tion violente ; plus tard, on ne trouve plus que legende et fascination." This comparison between the posthu- mous reputations of the two monarchs is no doubt inte- resting ; but it must be remembered that the interval of time requisite for an entire change of public opinion would be considerably greater in ancient Israel than in modern France. Add to this that the evil memories of Solomon would be strengthened and perpetuated by the Israelites' successful renunciation of the authority of his descendants, and by the subsequent labours of their new rulers, from motives of policy, to keep up and widen the estrangement. We may well doubt whether 10 THE SONG OF SONGS. under such circumstances the feeling against Solomon could have subsided in less than a century. Another indication of the date of the Song is to be found in the relation in which it stands to Psalm XLV. It is obvious that the two have much in common ; and it will be generally allowed that the shorter piece is the original, and that the Song is therefore younger than the Psalm. Now the psalm probably dates from the reign of Jchoshaphat (see my Introd. to the Psalms, I. pp. 261, 2) ; above which therefore the date of the Song must not be allowed to ascend. We are now in a position to enquire from what quarter the Song of Songs probably proceeded. If it be not the work of Solomon, it is plainly anonymous : that is to say, we have no warrant for ascribing it to any prophet or other sacred writer known to us by name. Whence then its reception into the Canon of Scripture? In all likelihood, because it proceeded from a member of some recognized sacred body. Such a body we have, in the kingdom of Israel, in the " sons of the prophets" so often mentioned in connexion with the history of Elisha (see on I. G). As the reception of the psalms " of Asaph" and of " of the sons of Korah" depended on their having been produced by mem- bers of the Levitical choirs, so may the original re- ception of the Song of Songs have been grounded on its being a production of a member of one of the pro- phetical schools. Such schools existed at Bethel, at Jericho, and at Gilgal. The position of Jericho, in the valley of the INTRODUCTION. 11 Jordan, is well known. Bethel lay on the hills, twelve miles to the W.N.W. : Gilgal, most probably, higher up in the hills, six miles N.N.W. of Bethel. The scenery described in the Song of Songs is, upon the whole, that with which the inhabitants of Jericho, Bethel, and Gilgal rather than those of Jerusalem would be familiar. It is true that Jerusalem itself is men- tioned—it could hardly well be omitted : it is true also that in the description of the garden (iv. 12) there may be an allusion to the gardens of Solomon near Beth- lehem. But of aught else in the south-west of the land of Israel,— of the scenery of the territory of Dan and of the greater part of that of Judah,— we find no trace. The word " sharon"— " meadow"— in II. 1 is not a proper name. On the other hand, how natural many of the pictures of the Song to one who, dwelling in the Jordan-valley, thence let the gaze of his imagination roam over those beauties of the land which at one time or another he had actually beheld! He looks south- ward over the Dead Sea, and amid the barrier-moun- tains of that sea rise before him the cliffs of Engedi (i. 14) ; or he looks eastward to the hills that hold up the plateau of Heshbon (vn. 4), and to the mountains of Bether (n. 17) and the slopes of Gilead (iv. 1, VI. 5) ; in the extreme north he summons before him the gor- geous heights of Lebanon and Amana, of Shenir and Hermon (iv. 8, 15) with the tower "which looketh toward Damascus" (vn. 4); while in the more central portions of the land Tirzah (vi. 4), and probably Baal- hamon (vni. 11), are not so far distant but that he 12 Tin: song of song?. easily pictures them within his range ; and these in their turn connect themselves with the luxuriant ridge of Carmel (vir. 5), on which moreover the notice of Elisha's journey thither (2 Kings II. 25) makes it pro- bable that there existed a fourth prophetical school, which the author of the Song may have officially visited, and to which, " for his brethren and companions' Bakes,' 1 his thoughts may have often turned. But we pass to the language of the Song, and to the expressions and turns of thought which it embodies. Here first we have to notice the uniform use of the rela- tive & for l^tf, as marking the idiom of a provincial author. Doubtless the use of it is studied : the author might have abandoned the provincialism had he so pre- ferred. But it is difficult to understand on what grounds it should ever have been deliberately adopted by Solo- mon ; for though it appear as an archaism in Gen. VI. 3, and as an archaism or provincialism in the Song of Deborah, Jud. v. 7, also in Jud. VI. 17, VII. 12, VIII. 26, and though it be once admitted into the Book of Job (xix. 29), and frequently into the Lamentations, and the later psalms, and Ecclesiastes, yet it was un- questionably eschewed by the polished form of the lan- guage in its best period. We are next arrested by the remarkable phrase "the chariots," i.e. " the strength," " of my people" (VI. 12) ; which finds its parallel in the words used, first of Elijah, and afterwards of Elisha (2 Kings n. 12 J xiii. 14). It is probable that the phrase belonged to the particular period at which the Song was written: INTRODUCTION. 13 certainly both in earlier and later times we fail to trace it. It must be remembered that the age of Elijah and Elisha was the age of the Syrian wars, and that chariots formed the main strength of the Syrian armies. Those who defend the view that Solomon was the author of the Song of Songs have naturally sought to draw out its points of contact with the Book of Pro- verbs. "Common to both," says Hengstenberg, "is the predilection for imagery and enigma, and peculi- arly so that for detailed personifications and allegorical descriptions, such as those which we have in the Pro- verbs where the personifications of Wisdom and Folly come before us. Besides this we have a whole series of separate, and in some instances highly characteristic, resemblances. Compare especially Prov. I. 9 with Cant. iv. 9 ; Prov. I. 28 with Cant. v. 6 ; Prov. v. 15 — 18 with Cant. IV. 12 ; Prov. V. 18, 19 with Cant. iv. 5 ; Prov. VI. 30, 31 with Cant. viii. 7 ; Prov. ix. 5 with Cant. vn. 2; Prov. XVI. 24 with Cant. iv. 11; Prov. XX. 13 with Cant. V. 2 ; Prov. XXIII. 31 with Cant. VII. 9; Prov. xxv. 11 with Cant. I. 11; Prov. xxv. 12 with Cant. vn. 1." Are then these resemblances of such a kind as to shew that the Proverbs and the Song proceeded from the same person? Do they not rather agree yet better with the supposition that the author of the Song of Songs had the Proverbs before him ; that they formed the latest book of Scripture in existence in his day; that he thus took up, as it were, the sacred thread which Solomon had last dropped ; and that he was consequently led to adopt, to a certain extent, the 14 THE SONG OF SONGS. I language, imagery, and style which Solomon had be- queathed to him? S For in fact we must not here pursue a onesided course : if we trace the resemblances between the Pro- l verbs and the Song of Songs, we are no less bound to trace those between the Song of Songs and the pro- phecy of Hosea. We shall then find that the depend- ence of the Song on the Proverbs is paralleled by the dependence of Hosea on the Song. It is emphatically the imagery of the Song that prepared the way for the symbolical acts of Hosea's ministry, Hos. I. III. The details of the imagery are indeed different : in the Song the spiritual marriage is still in prospect; in Hosea, it is viewed as long accomplished, and since disgracefully broken : in the Song the bridegroom is the Messiah, in ITosea the Lord God of Israel himself. Still the main idea of the marriage is common to both, and in both is carried out with a determinate fulness of which there is no other previous example. Then besides this we have particular connexions between the Song and Hosea in respect of details of imagery or of language. Among these are some in which the images belonging in the Song to the prospective union with the Messiah are adapted by Hosea to the past union with God himself: some in which the gifts, which the Song represents the Bride as receiving from the Bridegroom, are turned in Hosea into the allurements of strange lovers after which Israel is re- presented as wandering. Compare with Cant. r. 4, IIos. XI. 4 ; with Cant. I. 10, 11 , Ilos. II, 8; with Cant. I. 16, 1 7, IIos. xiv. 8 ; with Cant. II. 1, Hos. xiv. 5 ; with Cant. INTRODUCTION. 15 11. 3, Hos. xiv. 7, 8 ; with Cant. II. 5, Hos. VII. 5; with Cant. II. 13, Hos. II. 12 ; with Cant. II. 14, Hos. VII. 11; with Cant. in. 2, Hos. n. 7; with Cant. III. G, Hos. II. 3; with Cant. IV. 11, Hos. XIV. 6 ; with Cant. iv. 15, 16, Hos. xni. 15; with Cant. v. 6, Hos. n. 7; with Cant. v. 15, Hos. xiv. 5, with Cant. VI. 11, Hos. xiv. 7; with Cant. VIII. 5, Hos. II. 3, 14, XIII. 5. Probably also in Hos. xn. 10, " I have ...used simili- tudes by the ministry of the prophets," the Song of Songs is specially intended. The conclusion which thus from internal evidence commends itself to us respecting the authorship of the Song of Songs, is that it was probably composed, about a century or more after the death of Solomon, by a member of one of the prophetical schools in the king- dom of the ten tribes ; and that it was anterior to the earliest of what we ordinarily designate the prophetical writings. If this be so, we must hold the "Solomon" of the title to be identical with the ''Solomon" of the Song itself, i.e. with the Messiah; and must regard the 7 of the title as parallel, not with the 7, of authorship in the superscriptions of the psalms, from which indeed, in point of form, the title of the Song differs, but with the 7 in the "17U? of Psalm XLV. 1 (2), as pointing to the person whose glories are celebrated. The meaning of the title will thus be, " The most excellent of songs, pertaining to him who shall be to us a Solomon indeed." Even Hengstenberg, who contends, on the strength of the title, for the Solomonic authorship, writes in another 16 THE SONG OF SONGS. place (Abhandlung I.) that "in the very title Solomon [i.e. the heavenly Solomon] is set before us as the centre of the whole poem." Now it cannot be proved that the title was meant to indicate both the author and the subject of the Song: if then the latter reference be admitted, the assumption of the former becomes unne- cessary. Possibly moreover the lxx. have intended to mark Solomon as the subject rather than as the author of the Song, by rendering the title (according to the A atican text) 'Act/ao. aafidrcov, u ecrTC ^aXco/xcov. Yet one would not lay too much stress on a Greek title of which the reading is somewhat doubtful. § 2. A GENERAL sketch of the history of the interpretation of any book of Scripture can never be without its value. Our aim will here be rather to trace the rise and pro- gress of the different schools of interpretation of the Song of Songs, than to present any full and complete list of the commentators upon it. For notices of their separate works, the reader who desires it will be able to consult the historical analyses of the literature of the Song contained in the recent volumes of Grinsburg (1857) and A. M. Stuart (2nd edit. 1860); of which however the former must be used with some caution, in consequence of the colouring which the author's oppo- sition to the allegorical interpretation has imparted to it. INTRODUCTION. 17 We shall not enter here, for obvious reasons, upon the manner in which the Song of Songs was understood by our Lord and his apostles. The references made to it in the New Testament will come better under con- sideration hereafter. The earliest and oldest commentary therefore, alike of Jew and Christian, with which we have here to deal, is that of Origen, the father of Christian exegetical lite- rature. Only portions of it have come down to us ; but these sufficiently attest the way in which the book was by him interpreted. He views it as a nuptial song of a dramatic form, and as purely and exclusively allegorical. The Bridegroom is the Word of God: the Bride is either the soul of man, created after his image, or the Church. In practice it is rather to the mutual loves of Christ and the Church, than to those of Christ and the soul, that the expositions of Origen relate'. Of the same spiritual kind was the general interpretation of the Christian Fathers; of Athanasius, of Eusebius, of Basil, of Gregory of Nazianzus, of Gregory of Nyssa, of even (as we learn from his scholar Theodoret) the literal in- terpreter Diodore of Tarsus, of Theodoret himself, of Chrysostom, of Cyril of Alexandria, of Cyprian, of Am- brose, of Augustine, of Jerome. Especially interesting to us here, less from its own intrinsic value than as shewing the style of the prevalent interpretation, is the extant commentary of Philo, bishop of Carpasia in Cy- prus (cir. A.d. 400). It is evidently a breviary, or short expository compendium, mainly derived by the author from the writings of others: occasionally, as on 2 18 THE SONG OF SONGS. in. 6 — 8, containing a double exposition of the same passage. It is entirely and thoroughly Christian, ex- hibiting, like the commentary of Origen, nothing that is likely to have come from any Jewish source: in it Christ is the Bridegroom, the Church the Bride. Of the two alternative interpretations of Origen, this was in fact the one generally adopted: the other, which identi- fied the Bride with the human soul, is peculiar, as an exclusive interpretation, to the homilies of Gregory of Nyssa. Respecting the person of the Bridegroom all are agreed. The same Gregory fully defines him as that Solomon " who was born of the seed of David ac- cording to the flesh, whose name is Peace, who is the true king of Israel, the builder of the temple of God, who comprehends the knowledge of all things, whose is infinite wisdom, yea who is himself essential wisdom and truth, to whom belongs every name of God, and every intelligible conception that we can form of him." Of all the patristic comments however on the Song those of Theodoret are the most valuable. They are executed with judgment, and with a careful but discri- minating regard to the labours of earlier writers; are sufficiently full without being prolix; and have come down to us complete. In them, it is almost needless to say, Christ is the Bridegroom: the Bride is the Church, more especially as the company of those who have been perfected in all virtues; those who have not yet reached the full degree of perfection being represented, according to Theodoret, as the Bride's companions. It is mainly from Theodoret that we learn of the 6 INTRODUCTION. 19 early existence of views opposed to the general interpre- tation placed by the Church upon the Song. He tells us that there were those who calumniated it, and denied its spiritual character, venturing to assert that Solomon had composed it in reference to himself and Pharaoh's daughter; that there were others of the same class who framed a similar theory, substituting only for Pharaoh's daughter Abishag the Shunamitess ; while others again spoke of it with somewhat more respect as a royal dis- course, the people being the bride, the king the bride- groom. The first of these views was that of Theodore of Mopsuestia, as we see by the extracts from his writ- ings exhibited at the Second Council of Constantinople. Utterly denying to the Song all prophetical character, he formed the theory that it was written by Solomon as a sort of vindication, after the event, of his Egyptian marriage, with the design of allaying the disapproval which that proceeding had excited, and of commending himself, in spite of the reclamations of his countrymen, to his wife's affections. This theory may have been thrown out in haste; and as it is not known to have gained any supporters, so we may* not unreasonably suppose that Theodore himself would have attached but little importance to it. The interpretation however of the Song which was generally received in the Church, he, no doubt, determinately rejected. The strong terms in which his remarks on the book were reprobated at the Second Council of Constantinople shew how little acceptable they were to the Church at large. As we pass from the patristic writings to those of 2—2 20 THE SONG OF SONGS. later Latin authors, we find the expositions of the Song still following in the track already marked out, though on the whole less interesting and less valuable than those of the Fathers. Such is the commentary of Jus- tus Orgelitanus, contemporary with Justinian. Such again, and indeed well worthy of note, is the commen- tary of Cassiodorus, or at least that which passes under his name; and of which it may "be observed that its value will not be diminished, though its style and its references to Gregory the Great should determine it to a later date. The exposition attributed, whether rightly or wrongly, to Gregory himself is not so good. But we may speak well again of the commentary of Apo- nius, of unknown date 1 . Aponius had a knowledge of Hebrew; and a sentence near the opening of his com- mentary has apparently induced GinsLurg to hazard the assertion that he follows the Chaldee in viewing the Song as of a historico-prophetical character. An inspection of the commentary will shew that it contains no trace of the influence of the Chaldee, and that it is not more historico-prophetical than the commentaries of the earlier Christians. Aponius finds, in VIII. 1, 13, an indication of the ultimate conversion of the Jews after much suffering; but the germ of a corresponding inter- pretation of other passages may be traced also in Cassio- dorus. How entirely Christian, and un-Jewish, even to excess, is the commentary of Aponius, may be seen by 1 The reference to Aponius and Julian in Bede, Lib. v.. reads to me so like a later insertion, that I would not rely upon it as evidence of the tinie at which the former lived. INTUODUCTION. 21 the fact that he views the Lord Jesus, the Word of the Father, as the husband in even Ezek. xvi. and Hos. II. Another commentary of the same general period is that of Bede. It consists of five Books (n — vi.), in which he " has followed the footsteps of the Fathers, leaving the works of Gregory intact:" another book (vil.) com- prises a series of extracts from all parts of Gregory's writings, bearing upon the Song. To this work Bede prefixed also a controversial preface (Lib. I.) of his own, warning his readers against the commentary of Julian of Eclanum, which that writer had made a vehicle for his Pelagian doctrines. It is observable that in this preface Bede bases no argument of his own on any passage of the Song ; and that even in his commentary his remarks upon divine grace are most unobtrusive, such as no practical expositor, in unfolding such a pas- sage as I. 4, could well with justice omit. It could hardly have been foreseen that his work would be per- verted by Ginsburg into a foundation for the sneer, that the Song has been made to " contain a treatise upon the doctrine of free grace against Pelagianism 1 ." The primitive churchly interpretation of the Song was further illustrated in the middle ages by the much- prized sermons of Bernard upon the first two chapters ; continued, for the next two chapters, by his disciple Gillebert of Hoyland. The real value however of these * Ginsburg, p. 102. With a more illustrious author Ginsburg deals in a manner worthy of more serious blame. He exhibits, as a specimen of Augustine's treatment of the Song, a Donatist interpretation of I. 7, which that Father repeatedly brings forward for the purpose of refut- ing it. 22 THE SONG OF SONGS. sermons consists rather in the treasures of thought which they contain, and in the beauty of their language, than in the help which they afford to a student of the Song. It was during the life-time of Bernard that the first great Christian perversion of the meaning of the Song was made by those who took the Bride as representing the Virgin Mary. It is easy to see that this wresting of Scripture sprang out of the prevalent false doctrine and false practice. The first germs of the improper introduction of Mary into the Song may be traced in the metrical paraphrase of the Greek physician Michael Constantine Psellus (f cir. 1105), who views the passage VI. 8, 9, as setting forth her blessedness above that of all other saints. A similar view is taken of that pas- sage in Western literature by the Abbot Lucas, the epitomizer of Aponius. But it is by the Western com- mentator Kupert of Deutz (f 1135) that we first find the Song expounded generally as relating to her. He is followed in part by Biehard of St Victor (f 1173), and, at a later period, by the Spanish prelate James Perez of Valentia (1507). It became, in fact, the practice in the Romish Church to attribute to the Song a three- fold allegorical sense, the Bride representing alike the Church, the soul, and the Virgin Mary; and on this principle it was expounded in the ponderous tomes of Michael Ghislerius (1G13) and Cornelius a Lapide (f 1G37), each successive verse being compelled by these prolix commentators to submit to the three separate meanings which they imposed upon it. INTRODUCTION. 2 o But meanwhile, in the 14th century, another very different influence was for the first time to make itself felt in the Christian treatment of the Song. Side by side with the interpretation of the Song hitherto received in the Christian Church, there had grown up a conflict- ing interpretation among the Jewish rejecters of Chris- tianity 1 . The rudiments of it are found in the Talmud. It was fully developed in the Targum, or Chaldee para- phrase, a post-talmudic production, which has been re- ferred to the sixth century, and which must, from its freedom and copiousness, be regarded less in the light of a paraphrase than of an exposition, based, to a large extent, upon the principles of cabbalistic exegesis. The same interpretation may be traced also in the commen- tary of Saadia (f 942), in the Jewish liturgical hymns, and in the commentaries of the great Western Rabbies, Jarchi (f 1105), Rashbam (j* cir. 1155), and Aben Ezra (t 1167); in or after whose time a new Jewish philoso- phical interpretation, with which we are not now con- cerned, arose to dispute the field with it. The funda- mental principles of the older Jewish interpretation were that the Beloved of the Song wa£ the Lord God, and the Bride the congregation of Israel; and that the Song itself was a consecutive allegory of the history of Israel from the earliest times, through all the vicissitudes nar- rated in the Old Testament, onward to the period when their expectations should be consummated and their sufferings ended. In the details of the parallel between 1 For details, see Ginsburg, pp. 24 — 46. 24 THE SOXG OF SONGS. the allegory and the history, the Jewish writers differed much from one another ; though perhaps not more than might be fairly expected. This interpretation the converted Jew Nicolaus de Lyra (t 1341), uniting in himself the stores of Jewish and Christian learning, was now to introduce, in part, into the Christian Church. With respect to the Bride of the Song, he well pointed out that both Christians and Jews could afford to borrow somewhat of the others' views : the former, in identifying her with the Christian Church, had too much overlooked the career of God's earlier people : the latter, in identifying her with the congregation of Israel, had ignored the Church's real catholicity. He held therefore that the Bride repre- sented the Church in her state under both dispensa- tions ; that as there had been but one faith of both the earlier and later believers, although differing in aspect according to the degree in which it had been unfolded, so also there had been but one Church, although differ- ing in aspect according to the degree of the nearness of its conjunction to God ; that conjunction being closer since the time of the New Testament. The Bride- groom, he maintained with the Jews, was God himself. Chaps. I — vi. depicted the history of Israel from the days of the Exodus to those of Nehemiah : Chaps, vil, Vlli, the history of the Christian Church from its origin to the days of Constantine. It is evident that De Lyra introduced into the in- terpretation of the Song a systematic arrangement which, with earlier Christian expositors, it had lacked. INTRODUCTION. 25 It is no less evident that so far as the particular arrangement adopted was wrong, so far it would only- serve to lead the interpreter astray ; and De Lyra's own exposition was undoubtedly a failure. The detailed parallelism which he traces between the allegory and the history, and the excessive chronological character which he thus imparts to the Song, are not less forced and less prosaic in his commentary than in the Targum. The true key to the arrangement of the Song had yet to be found. Although succeeding expositors adhered with as little exactness to the scheme of De Lyra as Jewish expositors had adhered to that of the Targum, the style of interpretation which he had introduced into the Church became widely prevalent. It would be an end- less task to unfold the details of the various discrepant schemes to which it gave rise ; but we must not omit mention of the remarkable manner in which it was elaborated by those who instead of dividing the Song into Old Testament and New Testament portions, viewed it as setting forth, throughout, primarily the different phases of Old Testament history, and then also, under the figure of these, and simultaneously with them, the mysteries of redemption. Such a treatment of the Song we have in the work of Perez (1507), already men- tioned. It resembles one of those double sets of tableaux with which we meet in stained church-windows, where under each subject from the history of the Old Testa- ment is set a corresponding subject from that of the New. He divides the Song into ten separate canticles, 26 THE SONG OF SONGS. commencing respectively I. 2 ; 1. 12 ; ill. 8 ; in. 6 ; IV. 1 ; IV. 1G ; V. 8; VI. 1; VII. 13, "Return, return, &c. ;" VIII. 5. These severally delineate the promises to the Patriarchs ; the construction of the tabernacle ; the speaking of God from the tabernacle ; the carrying of the ark through the wilderness, with attendant miracles ; Moses' ascent of Pisgah ; the death of Moses ; the entrance into Canaan ; the conquest and partition of Canaan ; the conflicts and victories under the Judges ; and the prosperity and peace under Solomon. The corresponding events typified by them are the general expectations of the Old Testament saints ; the incarna- tion of Christ ; his teaching ; his earthly career and miracles ; his going up to Jerusalem ; his death ; the gathering into the Church of the first Jewish converts ; the mission of the Apostles to the Gentiles ; the con- flicts and victories of the martyr-church ; and the pros- perity and peace under Constantine. Was it perhaps such expositions as those of Perez, — rendered all the less welcome, be it remembered, by the place that the Virgin held in them, — from which Luther so strongly recoiled, characterizing them as " intempestiva? ct prodigiosan interpretationcs"? His own view, in which he was followed by the Suabian reformer Brentius, has certainly the merit of being more simple: whether in other respects it will compare favourably with them may reasonably be doubted. Re- verting to the Jewish doctrine that the Bridegroom and Bride represented God and the people of Israel, he treated the Song as a thanksgiving of Solomon for the INTRODUCTION. 27 divine establishment of his own kingdom. He seems thus in effect to have revived the principle of one of the anonymous interpretations mentioned and condemned by Theodoret. He regarded however the latter half of the Song as prophetical of the subsequent trials of the people and of the kingdom of Christ. The historicizing interpretations held their ground for some time in the Romish Church. In proof of this we may refer to the Partitiones Theologies? of Eder, rector of the University of Vienna (1582) : he divided the Song into ten dramas, on the same principle, appa- rently, as Perez. The learned Jesuit Cornelius a Lapide divided it better into five parts, commencing at I. 2 ; II. 8 ; in. 6 ; V. 2 ; VI. 4 : the themes of these parts were respectively the infancy of the Christian Church, its conflicts with the heathen power, its establishment under Constantine, its sufferings from heresy, and its renovation under the later Fathers. The corresponding interpretations which shot forth in — the Reformed Church were, it must be confessed, consi- L^ derably more extravagant. After that acquaintance with __ the Targum had become general, they were easily mul- tiplied ; and other causes, such as a desire to assimilate the interpretation of the Song to that of the Apocalypse, probably nursed the passion for them. They naturally differed much from each other. By the English inter- preters, Brightman (f 1607) and Cotton (1650), the Song was referred partly to the history of the Legal, partly to that of the Evangelical Church ; and so far it was well ; nor amid the many crudities which Bright- 28 THE SONG OF SONGS. man's commentary contains are there wanting explana- tions well worthy of attention. Thus he well recognizes in III. 4 the period of Christ's advent : IV. 6 he justly interprets of his death, and iv. 7 he so far understands as to refer it to the beauty which the Church then received. But the extraordinary minuteness of the de- tails of outward Church-history which he finds fore- shewn in the Song deprive his interpretation as a whole of all probability. The foreign expositors, Cocceius (fl669) and Heunisch (1688), viewed the Song as refer- ring exclusively to the history of the Church under the gospel dispensation, and thus erred more hopelessly than Brightman. Without entering into details, we may repeat generally that while this whole school of com- mentators were so far theoretically in advance of the Fathers that they recognized the principle of orderly arrangement to which the Song must conform, they yet distorted the meaning of isolated passages, which the Fathers had successfully explained, in order to make the interpretation of them square with the particular historical scheme which they adopted. Nor could it be other than a deep loss to the interpretation of the Song when the passage ill. 6 — 11 was, from whatever cause, no longer viewed as setting forth the Saviour's death. This failure to penetrate into the deep Christian meaning of passages which had once been understood was, it must be owned, common to most interpreters of the age following the Reformation. Still among the more sobcrminded there were preserved the general out- INTRODUCTION. 29 lines of an interpretation which contrasted favourably with the ultra-historical. In proof of this we may point to the headings of the chapters in our English Bible, which have the merit of being sound, though they do not descend much into particulars. Nor must we omit mention of the valuable annotations of the Brownist divine, Ainsworth (j" 1622), which have been translated into Dutch and German, and which embody a large amount of admirable scriptural illustration. Honourable mention may also be made of the explanations of Bp. Hall (fl656), especially as exemplifying the way in which the Song was probably in practice viewed by the greater number of those who gave their attention to it. We must now recount the history of a theory which though at length it serves but " to point a moral and adorn a tale," was in its day sanctioned by the authority of high names, and long fascinated the various writers upon the Song. It will be remembered that in the fifth century Theodore of Mopsuestia had ventured on asserting that the Bride of the Song of Songs was none other than the Egyptian princess whom Solomon espoused. Whether or no any relics of the interpreta- tion had been traditionally preserved in the East, we find the Jacobite primate Abul-Faraj (f 1286) allow- ing, in his Arabic history, the Song to be, outwardly, a dialogue between Solomon and Pharaoh's daughter. Otherwise the name of Pharaoh's daughter has not been traced in connexion with the Song till the occurrence of a reference to her, though even then " merely in pass- ing," in some of the first printed English Bibles in the 30 THE SONG OF-SONGS. sixteenth century 1 . It was ordered however that the exegetical literature of the succeeding century should open out for her a new career of fame. For this the celebrated Grotius was chiefly responsible. In his com- mentary on the Bible, mainly written during his Swedish embassy at the court of France (1635-45), he main- tained, with much coarseness, that the Song of Songs depicted the intercourse of Solomon with his Egyptian bride ; though he did not withal deny therein an under- current of allegorical meaning. Later in the century (1690) Bossuet, a learned and accomplished scholar, but one whose writings bear unmistakeable marks of the age in which he lived 2 , not only treated the Song as an epithalamium in which Solomon and Pharaoh's daughter appeared as types of Christ and the Church, but also introduced the view that it depicted a nuptial festivity extending, according to Hebrew custom, over seven days, those days being marked by the natural divisions of the 1 See A. M. Stuart. The assertion of Davidson and after him, Ginsburg, that she makes her appearance in Origen, is most improbable ; and after a careful search I feel assured that it is incorrect. I may add that Perez unjustly charges the ancient Jews with asserting that the Song was written in praise of her. 2 Compare the following, from his Prsefatio in Cant. Cant., with the landscapes of Claude and G. Poussin : " Caeterum ha?c Salomonis cantio tota scatet deliciis ; ubique flores, fructus, pulcherriinarumque plantarum copia, veris amcenitas, agrorum ubertas, horti vernantes, irrigui; aqua?, putei, fontes ; odoramenta, sive arte confecta, sive quae sponte sua humus parturit; ad haec colunibse, turturum voces, mella, lac, vina liquentia; postremo in utroque sexu forma? honestas ac venustas, casta oscula, amplexus, amores tam pudici quam blandi ; si quid horrescit, ut rupes, ferique montes, ac leonum cubilia, totum ad voluptatem, ac velut pulcherrimae tabula? ornatum varietatemque compositum." INTRODUCTION. 31 poem. Forthwith these views become classical. They were adopted in France, in whole or in part, by Cal- met (1726), and in France, perhaps, their influence was longest felt. In England they were highly commended by the elegant scholar Bp. Lowth (1753) ; and they may be traced through the subsequent works of Bp. Percy, the editor of the Reliques of English Poetry (1764), of Durell (1772), of Hodgson (1786), and of Williams (1801). The general tendency of the school was on the whole to slight the allegorical interpreta- tion, and to lay stress on the natural beauties of the imagery. In fact the former could not but suffer from the contact of the more literal interpretation that was associated with it. Still it was not generally denied ; nay, was to some extent even vindicated ; and it should also be acknowledged that Bossuet's notes were far better than his theory. An interpretation of the Song on truer principles was meanwhile preserved in France by Hamon, the physician of Port Royal, and continuator of the expo- sitions of Bernard (f 1687) ; and in England, though, no doubt, with different degrees of judgment, by Patrick (1700), Henry (1710), Durham (1723), and Wesley (1765). The reference to Solomon and Pharaoh's daughter was by the last-named commentator ex- pressly disallowed : the book spoke of the spiritual love and marriage between Christ and his Church. With these expositors we may associate in Germany J. H. Michaelis (1720) and Roos (1773). In Germany indeed the theory of Bossuet seems 32 THE SONG OF SONGS. never to have taken root. It was made known only to be condemned by J. D. Michaelis in his animadversions upon Lowth (1758). On its ruins walked a line of literalist critics, commencing with Herder (1778), who viewed the Song as a series of separate idyls. So Kleu- ker, Hufnagel, Paulus, Gaab, Doderlein, Augusti, Eich- horn, De Wette. The same was in England the view of Sir W. Jones, and of Dr Mason Good (1801). The work of the latter, considerable as is the learning which it displays, and the esteem in which it has been held, cannot on the whole be commended ; and it affords a warning of the little good likely to be accomplished by one who, while allowing the allegorical interpreta- tion, sets it aside, and thus becomes as though he al- lowed it not. Of those critics who have been less fettered by reverential restraint some have treated the Song as a mere collection of erotic songs or fragments. We are at last brought to that theory of the Song on which the labours of so many German scholars, mainly of the neologian school, of the present century have been expended; which Ginsburg has sought to naturalize in England, holding the moral lesson thus taught in the Song to be worthy of divine inspiration, and which Renan, denying to the book all sacred cha- racter, has, in like manner, transplanted into France. Indeed from the measure of approbation that seems to have been bestowed upon the theory, or at least upon the labours of its advocates, Eenan says, not without reason, that it has become in some sort classical in Germany, England, and Holland. From Ginsburg we INTRODUCTION. 33 further learn that it may be also regarded as the view of the Song now generally entertained by the Jews; and, doubtless, he would be entitled to speak on this subject with no light authority, were it not for the contempt with which he decries the defenders of the allegorical interpretation. The theory in question was originally propounded, though in an imperfect form, by Jacobi in 1771: after passing through the hands of Amnion (1790) and Umbreit (1820), it seems to have been matured by Ewald in 1826: since then it has been successively wrought upon by Hirzel (1840), Hei- ligstedt (1848), Bottcher (1849), Meier (1854), Friedrich (1855), Hitzig (1855), and Vaihinger (1858). By Hit- zig it has indeed been considerably elaborated; but it is not likely to be presented in a much more attractive form than by Ginsburg, in English (1857); and to his volume we may accordingly, for the most part, refer, when we come to discuss it. The Song, according to this theory, is viewed as a dramatic poem, in which a country maiden is carried off by Solomon to his harem at Jerusalem; there he endeavours, by commendations and by promises, to attach her to himself; but she, in the strength of faithful love to the shepherd who is the real object of her affections, resists all the king's temp- tations, and finally, set free, returns with her beloved to her own rural abode. The advocates of this theory contend, of course, for a purely literal interpretation ; but, meanwhile, how strongly the allegorical character of the Song has been felt by even those who have rejected the general inter- 3 34 THE SONG OF SONGS. pretation of the Church, is shewn by the views which some isolated scholars of the present century have put forth. According to Hug (1813), the Bride of the Song represents the ten tribes in the days of Hezekiah ; ac- cording to Kaiser (1825), the new Jewish colony in the days of Zerubbabel; and according to Hahn (1852), Japhetic heathenism. With less novelty, but with more judgment, Heng- stenberg (1853), in a masterly manner, vindicates the meaning of the Song to Christ and the people of God, though he wrongly restricts it too much to the nation of Israel; the American Burrowes (1853), like Gregory of Nyssa, beholds in it the converse of Christ and the soul ; and the Scottish expositor A. M. Stuart (2nd edit. 1860), without undervaluing or disregarding its reference to the affections of the individual believer, understands it also, as it was understood by the earliest Christian expositor, of the mutual love of Christ and the Church. We can hardly fail, in thus pursuing the history of the treatment of the Song, to be struck with the man- ner in which the original Christian interpretation has, under all opposing influences, continued to assert its own inherent vitality. The contrast between it and all rival interpretations is in this respect very great. Take for example the interpretation of Bossuet, — always remem- bering that its author would himself have probably not regarded it as conflicting with the primitive interpreta- tion, — how generally has it now died out, in regard of all its distinctive features! Yet it was on this that in the days of Lowth and Percy all the approbation of scholar- INTRODUCTION. 35 ship was for the time bestowed. Can the advocates of the interpretation which is exhibited in Ginsburg's volume give any good reason for supposing that theirs will be more lasting? It is as yet but in its 93rd year, — not a great age for the fundamental interpretation of a book of Scripture; and already the signs of decrepi- tude have appeared in the complicated contrivances by which Hitzig has found it necessary to minister to its infirmities. In the present strife of tongues indeed, as the various influences at work, whether for good or for evil, more and more accumulate, and as it becomes more and more easy for students to acquaint themselves with the various successive views of former ages, it is probable that some of those will, from time to time, turn up afresh. Thus in a late and not unpleasing volume, Weiss, a Scottish converted Jew, has substantially repeated De Lyra by importing into the Church a new adaptation of the Chaldee paraphrase, finding room, like De Lyra, for a portion of the New Testament history towards the end of the Song (1859). The German theologian Hofmann, on the other hand (Appendix to Delitzsch, 1851), ad- vances a view which, though in great measure peculiar, has yet its points of contact with that of Luther. De- litzsch (1851) offers a sort of compromise between the conflicting views of others: he views the Song as based upon a passage in Solomon's history, and rejects all di- rect allegorical interpretation of it, but at the same time views it as setting forth the idea of marriage, and in this the type of the spiritual relation of Christ to his Church. 3—2 36 THE SONG OF SONGS. It would not seem however, from Hitzig's preface, that this is likely to conciliate the adherents of the dominant literalist school which has been struggling to possess itself of the entire field. Nor indeed, if the first love of the Christian expositors of the Song he true, is there reason why we should in any degree recede from the position which they took. Truth is better than even conscientious compromise; and it is also more con- vincing. Even though she must defend by controversy the spiritual treasures of her Song of Love, the Church need not be ashamed of that richness of its contents which has nourished the love of so many of the holiest of her children. Let her yet speak out, and that with no uncertain sound. The companions who once may have mocked will then yet listen for her voice; and it is the will of her Beloved that she should utter it forth, that so both he and they may hear it. §3- In proceeding to discuss the various views that have been entertained with regard to the purport of the Song of Songs, we shall begin with those by which its mean- ing is most seriously wrested or misconstrued ; and with which, in the main, we are only concerned so far as it is needful to refute them. Foremost and earliest among them is the theory which identifies the Bride of the Song with the Virgin Mary. This was the view of some medieval inter- INTRODUCTION. 37 preters. We shall hardly need to dwell long on it. It is fatal to it that the special relation in which Christ stood to the Virgin Mary is not the relation in which the heavenly Solomon stands to the Bride in all but a single passage of the Song. That one passage — the only one from which the theory in its full strictness could derive any shadow of support — is vill. 5 ; and curiously enough the mistranslation of that passage in the Vulgate deprived the medievalists of even the one proof which they might otherwise have found for the baseless fabric which they reared. It is however evi- dent that it could only, at best, be allowable to associate the figure of the Virgin Mary with the interpretation of that passage in so far as she might be viewed as repre- senting for the moment the entire community. The same holds good in reference to Rev. xn. 1 ; or in re- ference to the case where the painter of a sacred subject, of universal interest, borrows his faces from some living models. It is moreover hardly less fatal to the theory before us that no sanction for it should exist in the writings of any Christian Father. Were it true, it is inconceivable that it should not have been recognized in the Christian Church from the first. But it is younger than Christianity by more than a thousand years. How far it now retains its adherents in the Romish Church is not easily ascertained ; especially as much may pass current there among the vulgar that scholars would be ashamed to repeat. Many, probably, who, in conformity with their doctrinal prepossessions, insinuate a special indirect application of the Song to 38 THE SONG OF SONGS. her as foremost of the saints, would yet not contend for any direct reference to her in it. § 4- We advance then to the theory which views the Song as based upon, and as partially celebrating, some historical marriage of Solomon : whether that with Pha- raoh's daughter, or one with an Israelitish bride, the critics of Bossuet's school are not agreed. Of this theory we observe, without entering into details, that it intro- duces many difficulties and explains none. Whatever might have been the case in a short ode, where only a single scene is delineated, it is unlikely that for the pur- poses of a longer poem, marked by so extensive and orderly a variety of incidents, the story of any one typical marriage could have been found to run exactly parallel to the story of the union of Christ and his Church. Why rather, if the poet, with Psalm xlv. before him, wished to set forth under the marriage-figure the relations of the Church to the future Messiah, should he not draw upon all the varied stores and products of a well-furnished and teeming imagination for the several requisite details of his imagery? For indeed while the course of action of the Song faithfully depicts the successive known re- lations of the Church to Christ, it is only by shifts and expedients, and by the arbitrary introduction of all manner of supplementary hypotheses, that it can be fitted to the imaginary history of any possible earthly INTRODUCTION. 39 marriage. When Bp. Percy presumes to "blame the allegorical interpreters of the Song for neglecting its literal sense, it is evident that his complaint rests upon the false assumption that all the passages of the Song can without violence be worked up into the thread of a literal story. But that is far from being the case : the poet has borrowed his representations from various heterogeneous sources : the unity of his Song lies only in the allegorical sense which he has continually before him. Thus for example the passage iv. 6, "I will get me to the mountain of myrrh, and to the hill of frank- incense," sets forth, by a certain imagery of its own, Christ's passion, which is the main theme of the section of the Song in which it is found; and it belongs to the story of Christ's marriage because his act of espousal consisted in his passion ; but the moment that the al- legorical sense is set aside, that passage loses all con- nexion with nuptials or with love ; for of the sense which Percy presses upon it, the less said the better. One great type the Song admits, — the typical figure of King Solomon : but that there existed any typical ori- ginal of the Bride has never been proved, and it would only embarrass us to assume it. The other part of Bossuet's theory, the division of the Song into seven portions corresponding to the seven days of a Jewish wedding-feast, is equally opposed to the tenor of its contents. If it be urged that some of the days are marked by the expressions in n. 17, iv. 6, it cannot be shewn that they are all so marked ; and the real division of the Song is, as we shall find, not into 40 THE SONG OF SONGS. seven but six sections, which all begin and terminate elsewhere. Further proof of Bossuet's view we have none ; while on the other hand we observe that the passage in. G — 11 belongs manifestly to the great espousal-day, not to a day in the middle of the feast, and that the variety of incident which the Song contains is inconsistent with the unbroken continuance of a nuptial festivity. How shall the passages ill. 1 — 5, v. 2 — 8, unless all in them be mere dream, be made to harmonize with the first week of a marriage? Then moreover it was a fun- damental objection which Michaelis took to this theory, that no mention of nuptial rites is made throughout the Song. Perhaps he somewhat overstated this ; but let us listen to Percy's answer. " That the common rites of marriage are not the formal subject of this poem is allowed ; nor will it be wondered at, if we consider who is the poet, — a lively and ingenious monarch, who, it should seem, had already gone through all these cere- monies a great many times ; and this being the case, what could there be engaging in them? What could there be in them of novelty to excite his genius, or deserve his description?" With this naive defence we may dismiss the theory. Those most adverse to it could hardly have pronounced upon it a severer con- demnation. INTRODUCTION. 41 §5- We have now to deal with that latest treatment which would represent the Song of Songs as a drama displaying the constancy of virtuous love under tempta- tion. It is evident that hardly any theory could, in its method of viewing the Song, more utterly conflict with the interpretation received in the Church for sixteen centuries. Will it bear the test of examination ? It is the fundamental postulate of this theory that there should be two principal male characters, instead of one, speaking either directly or indirectly in the poem. And so certain do the advocates of the theory appear that this is the case, that they actually rely upon the asserted fact as the main proof of the correctness of their view. How do they establish it? " The beloved shepherd," says Ginsburg, "when he speaks, or is spoken to, or is spoken of, is recognised by the pastoral language; the King is distinguished by express allu- sions to his position;" and "an attentive reader of the original will find nearly as much help from the masterly structure of this Song, as can be obtained from the divisions and initial letters in modern dramas, by which the different speakers are distinguished." This sounds well ; but it must be owned that the argument would be more convincing were the advocates of the theory more nearly agreed among themselves as to which parts of the Song should be put into the lips of the King and the Shepherd respectively. Let us take three of the latest, Ginsburg, Renan, and Hitzig; all attentive readers of 42 THE SONG OF SONGS. the original, as will doubtless be admitted. We find that the passage I. 15 is assigned by Ginsburg to the Shepherd, by Hitzig and Renan to Solomon: II. 2 is assigned by Ginsburg and Renan to the Shepherd, but by Hitzig to Solomon : Ginsburg makes the Shepherd the speaker in iv. 1 — 5, and 7 to middle of 16, with part of v. 1, but Renan gives iv. 1 — 7 to Solomon, the remainder of the above to the Shepherd, while Hitzig gives iv. 1 — 5, 7, 9, 10, 12, &c. to Solomon, 6, 8, 11 to the Shepherd: VI. 8 is given to Solomon by Ginsburg and Hitzig, but to the Shepherd by Renan : vi. 9 is given to Solomon by Ginsburg, but to the Shepherd by Hitzig and Renan. How little value is attached by Ginsburg himself to his own argument may be gathered from the circumstance that whereas he assigns IV. 1 — 5 to the Shepherd, he yet, when this passage is partially repeated in VI. 5 — 7, VII. 3, puts the identical words into the mouth of Solomon. It is clear that he sees no fundamental difference in the language which his two male characters use. And it is not pretended that they ever address each other; nor indeed is there a single passage in which, according to any probable interpretation 1 , they are both addressed or spoken of together. The distinction between them is in fact purely fictitious : there is but one male character in the Song, the true Beloved. As to his appearing some- times in the full pomp of royalty, sometimes in more pastoral, or at least in simpler guise, that is a matter which can occasion no difficulty to those who take the 1 For I. 12, aee p. 44. INTRODUCTION. 43 Song in its allegorical meaning. The real unity of the Song lies in the spiritual Story which it sets forth. In the one person of the Lord Jesus Christ all contradic- tions are reconciled; and the object of investing him with his full royal splendour and with his princely title, Solomon, in III. 6 — 11, is to signalize his glory in the most solemn act of his incarnate career. He is repre- sented both as a king and as a shepherd elsewhere in the Old Testament; and this even in the same passage, Ezek. xxxiv. 23, 24 ; Micah v. 2 — 4. Surely we need not now, in interpreting the Old Testament, go back to imitate the errors of those who sundered the different portions of the Old Testament picture of Christ by distinguishing between a Messiah ben- Judah and a Mes- siah ben-Ephraim. So much for the characters with which modern theory presents us. But the supposed plot of the drama will hardly fare much better in the crucible of enquiry. The advocates of the theory explain the situation in the opening of the piece, by informing us that the country- maiden had, in entering a garden near her rural abode, accidentally and unexpectedly found herself in the presence of the king, who, struck with her beauty, had either invited her into his tent, or, as most suppose, carried her off forthwith to his court, where accordingly we discover her. All this rests on an application of the inventive faculty to a mistranslation of vi. 12. They render, in that verse, not " made me the chariots," or "made me like the chariots," but "brought me to the chariots," or "set me on the chariots;" an inadmissible 44 THE SONG OF SONGS. rendering, which even they themselves allow to be doubtful so far as the Hebrew words are concerned. Pass we on. The action has commenced. In I. 9 — 11 Solomon tempts the maiden. We then learn from Ginsburg that in I. 12 she replies; and that by "my nard" she intends the Shepherd to whom she is at- tached. Surely "every unbiassed reader" will hardly deem this the natural interpretation. Turn we to II. 4 : most expositors would there regard the first clause as explained by, and as helping to explain the similar clause in I. 4. Not so however Ginsburg ; for with him they speak of two different persons, Solomon and the Shepherd. Hitzig, it is true, (whose commentary, though published before Ginsburg's and Kenan's, evi- dently represents a later recension of the theory) remedies these awkwardnesses; but how? By introducing a supply of additional speakers, and therewith also a large supply of stage-directions. We shall give his view of the speakers in I. 2 — II. 7. First Scene : 2, The maiden. 3, 4, Ladies of the harem. 5 — 7, The maiden. 8, La- dies of Jerusalem. Second Scene: 9 — 11, Solomon. 12, A lady of the harem. 13, Another ditto. 14, The maiden (of her absent shepherd). 15, Solomon (to the maiden). 16, first clause, The maiden (to Solomon). 16, second clause, to II. 1, ditto (to her absent shepherd). 2, Solomon (to the maiden). 3, The maiden (of her shepherd). 4, A lady. 5, as 3. 6, as 4. 7, The Poet's moral. It is evident that sufficient ingenuity might make a complicated cross-dialogue of this kind out of almost anything : each difficulty that might arise would INTRODUCTION. 45 only require at most one additional complication, or one additional speaker. On the other hand, in II. 8 — 17, where the advocates of the theory before us wish to cany on the current of thought more smoothly, the isolated verse II. 15 is a great stumbling-block. Ginsburg will have it addressed to the maiden by her brothers ; but he forgets that the ITPIJ^, " take ye," is plural. Ke- nan makes it the fragment of a song which the maiden sings. Hitzig translates, "Hold there! ye foxes," making the verb intransitive, and the noun vocative ; but even this is not very satisfactory. It is moreover not only in particular verses but also in whole sections that the plot of these critics stands condemned. The expressions of III. 11 compel them to behold in the section III. 6 — 11 a marriage procession of Solomon; and indeed Hitzig carries on that marriage into the dia- logue of the next chapter. But to the plot of the drama, as these writers understand it, any marriage of Solomon is irrelevant, and worse than irrelevant. It needs only to read Ginsburg's note on in. 11, to be convinced of the absurdity to which it leads ; that a king, in the very hour of his marriage procession, an'd in the very com- pany of his consort, should put on his marriage crown for the sake of dazzling, and so alluring, another woman ! Then as to the section v. 2 — 8 : the maiden, says Gins- burg, " relates to the court ladies a dream which she has had, in which she manifests great attachment for her beloved." But our critics have already presented us with either a dream, or something resembling it, and of the same general character, in in. 1 — 5. Under 46 THE SONG OF SONGS. these circumstances, the new and fuller dream is against all dramatic rule ; for as it is but a dream, its details add nought to the development of the plot ; while the use of it, as exhibiting the maiden's affection to her be- loved, has been superseded by the earlier half-dream, and so the interest in it spoiled. It did not need so full a dream to lead merely to the question in v. 9. Lastly, we have to object to the theory before us the backward manner in which according to it the story of the plot is told. Renan candidly acknowledges this : "II est cer- tain que dans l'etat actuel du poeme, l'ordre chrono- logique de Taction est tout-a-fait renverse. Ainsi, au chapitre i er , nous voyons la jeune fille faire son entree dans le serail ; au chap. Ill, elle entre pour la premiere fois dans Jerusalem ; au chapitre vi, elle est surprise it Sulem par les gens de Salomon ; au chapitre viii, ses freres semblent former ensemble un com plot dont le de- veloppement constituerait le nocud du poeme." The only remedy which Renan can see for these difficulties, though he wisely shrinks from applying it, is to trans- pose some portions of the Song. Ginsburg provides against one particular of the objection by assuming, not very naturally, that the scene in Chap. I. is really prior in order of time to the maiden's being carried off to Jerusalem. But then this renders it only the more im- probable that after she has been so carried off, and after the interest of the first temptation scene has been ab- sorbed in that of the second, the maiden should, in VI. 11, 12, explain not how she was brought to Jerusalem, but only how she fell in, originally, and at the first, INTRODUCTION. 47 with the cortege of her royal admirer. We must, by the way, remark that VIII. 9 will not bear the interpre- tation which the literalists impose upon it : see the commentary upon that passage. They respect its imagery as little as they do the syntax of VI. 12 ; and they have no more right to the one passage than to the other, as explaining their plot, or as telling in their favour. It is indeed only by constraint that the Song can be viewed as a drama conforming to the rules of outward dramatic unity. In the internecine warfare of literal criti- cism, the dramatizing literalists will find it as difficult to withstand the assaults of the idyllizing literalists as the latter to resist the force of the arguments of the former. There is a unity in the Song ; but that unity, as we have already observed, lies in the spiritual story which the allegory holds up to view. Do we then deny to the Song all dramatic character? By no means. The Beloved, the Bride, the Chorus of the Daughters of Jerusalem have in it all their several dramatic parts. And in discriminating the speeches of the Beloved from those of the Bride a reference to the original Hebrew will be of great service, because of the distinction in Hebrew between the masculine and feminine forms of the 2nd personal pronoun, which is wanting in English. In fact such reference will at once solve all questions with regard to the structure of the main and simpler part of the dialogue. It is only with respect to a few subordinate and enigmatical passages that any difficulty will then remain in deciding who is the speaker in them : 43 THE SONG OF SONGS. such for instance as the refrain in II. 7 ; which, although "best put into the lips of the Bride, might also, no doubt, with some shew of probability, be assigned either to the Beloved, or to the Chorus, or even to the Poet him- self, though indeed it is through the Chorus that he would, as in the Greek drama, most naturally speak. The last and perhaps the greatest objection to the theory which we have been discussing is the incongruity of the character of the Song of Songs, so interpreted, with the place which it occupies in the canon of Holy Scripture. Were the theory true, the book would forth wi tli cease to be in any way sacred. It would not be sacred in itself; nor would it have any special con- nexion with the sacred history of God's people or of the lineage of the Redeemer, such as belongs to the Books of Esther and of Ruth. It seems moreover questionable whether even that high moral character which Gins- burg earnestly vindicates for it would be conceded to it by all his critical allies; and indeed one may well doubt whether the benefit of the great moral lesson which it is asserted to inculcate would not be fully counterbalanced by the corrupting tendency of the not wholly inattractive pictures of vice which according to the same theory it would contain. Yet let us take it even at the best which this theory can make of it, — as recording " an example of virtue in a humble indivi- dual, who had passed successfully through unparalleled" (though, surely, not unparalleled !) " temptations." How then herein does Ginsburg unfold its great importance ? He discourses, justly and excellently, on the evils of , INTRODUCTION. 49 polygamy and on the true dignity of woman ; and then, having worked up his theme, suddenly puts in his plea for the book " which celebrates the virtuous example of a woman, and thus strikes at the root of all her re- proaches and her wrongs." Now undoubtedly the debasing effects of polygamy were, even among the Jews, very great ; and it is one of the great glories of Christi- anity that it has restored woman to her rightful position, and that in this respect the influence of its teaching- has been felt and has prevailed even beyond its own pale. But where is the proof — no, we will not ask for proof, — where is the faintest indication to be found, that the Song of Songs, as interpreted by the dramatizing literalists, ever in any way contributed to this result? Is it not too strong a claim upon our credulity that we should be required to believe that the increased respect accorded to the female sex since the days of our Saviour was, even indirectly, promoted by a book of Scripture of the right understanding of which, ^according to Gins- burg, the first traces are to be found in a Jewish com- mentator of the 12th century, and of which the true meaning was never discovered, with any approach to adequacy, till the year A.D. 1771 ? §6. We shall now offer some evidence in confirmation of the allegorical character of the Song of Songs. And first, then, we have to notice the tokens scat- tered through the Song itself, that it is to be viewed as 50 THE SONG OF SONGS. an allegory. Such are the significance of many of the proper names in it, and the references, in some cases unmistakeable, to that significance. Without, of course, insisting on the name Solomon, we may enumerate Bether (ir. 17), Amminadib (vr. 12), Shulamith (vi. 13), Heshbon (vn. 4), Bath-rabbim (ib.), Baal-hamon (vm. 11). Such also is the employment of words, which by their resemblance in sound to other words indicate their own allegorical significance: see the commentary on 1. 10, 14. This play on words is of no unfrequent occurrence in Hebrew poetry : we may cite a good instance of it in Psalm lxxxiv. 5 — 7, where, through the double mean- ings of three of the terms employed, we have at once both a parable and its interpretation l . Another token, — indeed token is here too weak a word, — of the alle- gorical character of the Song is to be found in the fact that she who is the bride of the Beloved is no less his sister, I v. 10. In vain the literalists attempt to explain this away : see the commentary on the passage. To the same effect run the impossibilities of some of the local descriptions, if literally understood ; more particu- larly iv. 8, where there is no conceivable reason why the Beloved should summon his Bride from the literal Lebanon, or should bid her cither gaze or go from the literal summit of Amana. And yet if the Song generally be literally taken, an unbiassed reader will not easily believe that by Lebanon in that passage can be denoted either Jerusalem or indeed any other place than Lebanon itself. In favour also of the allegorical meaning is the 1 See my Introduction to the Psalms, II. p. 71. INTRODUCTION. 51 character of the similes by which the graces of the Be- loved and of the Bride are delineated : iv. 1 — 5, V. 10 — 16, VI. 4 — 7, vii. 1 — 6. Understood of literal corporeal beauty, these descriptions could hardly appear other than extravagant. Furthermore the allegorical inter- pretation is able to deal far more satisfactorily than the literal with such passages as V. 2 — 7. So evident is it that it can be no actual occurrence that is there literally described, that the literalists are obliged to take recourse to the view that that passage contains the relation of a dream. But the allegorical interpretation finds no difficulty in beholding there a direct continua- tion of the action of the poem. The indications thus contained in the Song itself are in harmony with the evidence afforded by its su- perscription. Literally understood, the Song contains nought which should entitle it to be distinctively styled " The most excellent of songs." Neither the beauty of its natural descriptions nor the moral sentiments which it unfolds would justify the special pre-eminence which the title thus accords to it. But let it be viewed as depicting the love of Christ and the Church, and forth- with the justice of the designation becomes evident. The Song is the song of songs, for it celebrates the glories of the Incarnate Son of God and sings of the highest ideal of both nuptial and antenuptial love. It would be a strange anomaly were the title " Song of Songs" reserved for the one book of the Bible which contained no reference to religion. Our next proof that the Song of Songs is an alle- 4—2 52 THE SONG OF SONGS. goiy is supplied by its parallelism with Psalm xly. The allegorical character of this psalm is generally ad- mitted : for a vindication of it, which need not be here repeated, see Introd. to the Psalms, I. pp. 260 seqq. Further evidence, though of a subordinate kind, to the same effect is contained in the correspondence between the Song and the prophecy of Hosea : see above, pp. 14, 15. The Song has also its points of contact with the remarkable allegory in Ezek. xvi. : compare espe- cially Cant. 1. 10, " Comely are thy cheeks in the circlet, thy neck in the necklace," with Ezek. xvi. 11 : "I decked thee also with ornaments, and I put bracelets upon thy hands, and a chain on thy neck." That the Song was viewed as an allegory in the time of our Saviour, is rendered probable by the use made of its images in the apocryphal 2 Esdras v. 23 — 27 ; and if the support thence derived to the allegorical interpretation be slight, it is at least more than the literal can boast : " O Lord that bearest rule, of every wood of the earth, and of all the trees thereof, thou hast chosen thee one only vine : and of all lands of the world thou hast chosen thee one pit: and of all the flowers thereof one lily :... and of all the fowls that are created thou hast named thee one dove:. ..and among all the multitudes of people thou hast gotten thee one people : and unto this people, whom thou lovedst, thou gavest a law that is approved of all." Compare Cant. II. 1, 2 : VI. 9. And now how was the Song viewed by Christ him- self, by his forerunner, and by his apostles? The INTRODUCTION. 53 llterallsts would fain persuade us that there are no references to it in the New Testament. It is indeed there never directly quoted ; but, on the other hand, the passages in which its language and its imagery are in various ways embodied, are numerous ; the use thus made of it is uniformly allegorical; the cumulative co- gency of these repeated dependences upon it in favour of the allegorical interpretation becomes very great; and throughout the Xew Testament no hint is to be found tli at it bore or could bear any other than an allegorical meaning. The designation of the Church as the Bride in Rev. xxi. 2, 9, xxn. 17, commends itself the more naturally to us when we allow the preparation which had been made for it by the imagery of the Song. Still more is this the case with John the Baptist's designa- tion, in John in. 29, of Christ as the Bridegroom: he himself being but the bridegroom's friend, cf. Cant. V. 1. Our Saviour too describes himself by the same title, Matth. ix. 15; and speaks most remarkably of the mourning of the children of the bridechamber when the bridegroom should be taken from them; a contingency which in reference to most bridegrooms would not have been anticipated, but which had been foreshewn in the case of the heavenly bridegroom in Cant. v. 6 — 8. Then the marriage of the Lamb of Bev. xix. 9 — though it here refers to the final union — rests naturally on the bridal union of the Song. The same too is the case with St Paul's description of Christ presenting the Church unto himself, in Eph. v. 27: indeed the lan- guage of that passage, "that it* should be holy and 54 THE SONG OF SONGS. a without blemish," expressly recalls Cant. IV. 7. Of the various further correspondences which we proceed to notice some will be more fully unfolded in the commen- tary; to which therefore the reader may refer. The image of Cant. v. 2 repeats itself in Rev. III. 20, " Be- hold, I stand at the door, and knock." That of Cant. V. 1, in the same verse, "I. ..will sup with him, and he with me;" also in John xiv. 23, " My Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him;" also in Luke XXII. 30, "That ye may eat and drink at my table in my kingdom." On Cant. in. 2, v. 6, rest John yii. 34, " Ye shall seek me, and shall not find me;" and John XIII. 33, "Ye shall seek me; and as I said unto the Jews,... so now I say to you." With the passage Cant. vin. 8, which speaks of the little sister, who although not yet marriageable, should yet hereafter be demanded as a bride, is connected 2 Cor. XI. 2, in which St Paul describes the Gentile community of Corinth as a chaste virgin whom he had laboured to present to Christ. On Cant. II. 3, VIII. 5, probably, (see the comment on this last,) rests Luke I. 35, " The power of the Highest shall overshadow thee." And Cant. ii. 15 prepares the way for our Lord's designation of Herod as a fox, i.e. a waster of the Church. Yet more remarkable, in some respects, is the way in which the language of the Song forms the prelude to certain symbolical actions recorded in the New Testament; just as our Saviour's discourses in John III, vi prepared the way for the institution of the ordinances of the two Christian sacraments. In Cant. II. 4 we have the trerm INTRODUCTION. 55 of the teaching conveyed by the miracle at Cana of Galilee, John II. 1 — 11. Our risen Saviour's bidding to his disciples in John xxi. 12, " Come and dine," stands in a similar relation to Cant. v. 1 : he had, in the oblation of himself unto death, visited the mountain of myrrh and the hill of frankincense, ' and he was now on the very point of coming into his garden, the Church of the new covenant, to eat and to drink with the mem- bers of his body at the feast of love which his love had originated. And as it was not only our Saviour's own acts, but also those of others towards him, which, whether so intended or not by their authors, proved to be symbolical, and are, as such, recorded by the evan- gelists, we cannot from Cant. I. 12 separate the two anointings of our Saviour's feet, Luke VII. 36 scqq. ; John xii. 3 seqq., &c. ; nor yet from Cant. v. 3, Peter's girding on of his fisher's coat, in his eagerness to hasten to his risen Lord, John .xxi. 7. We need only further remark on this subject that as the Song is truly a song, and not a narrative or direct instruction or prophecy, direct quotations from it were not to be expected. A poem which has thoroughly enwrou'ght itself into men's minds is felt too deeply to be formally referred to, though its imagery and language become interwoven with their most familiar thoughts. Some objections have been raised to the allegorical interpretation of the Song which may here be conve- niently noticed, as they have not been touched upon in the preceding remarks. It has been urged that parts of the passage VII. 1 — 9 5G THE SONG OF SONGS. are, when put into the lips of Christ, inconsistent with his dignity and purity. Yet why inconsistent, when allegorically interpreted ? Unto the pure all things are pure. The ancient interpreters took no offence at these words; and probably their views of the person of Christ were quite as elevated as those of the mass of interpret- ers of the present day. Neither the conventions of modern custom, however useful in their way, nor yet the conventions of dress must be taken as marking the absolute bounds of that which may be described without immodesty. The saying in John vn. 38, " Out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water," is not in har- mony with the fastidiousness of modern taste, though it proceeded from our Saviour. No parts of the female form are described in the Song but what a sculptor would imitate, in order thereby to display the full sym- metry of the human figure; nor would he generally be blamed for this, so long as he sought by it to appeal to the spectators' ideas of beauty, and not to their idle curiosity or impure passions 1 . Those who are jealous for the honour of the Bible should beware of supposing that they uphold it by seeing in the passage under re- view aught but a genuine commendation of the graces of the Church. The passage particularizes so minutely that, were the spirit of it vicious, the tendency of it would needs be also vicious, from whomsoever it were represented as proceeding. The public exhibition of 1 " Beauty, and the passion caused by beauty, which I call love, is different from desire, though desire may sometimes operate along with it." — Burke, On the Sublime and Beautiful, m. i. . INTRODUCTION. 57 that which is impure does not practically conduce to purity: we can hardly, even in a drama, enter with any fulness of detail into feelings that are immoral, without catching somewhat of their tone of immorality. More- over it will appear from our commentary that the verses VII. 7 — 9 are probably to be put into the lips not of the Beloved but of the Chorus; in which case their purport will necessarily be very different from what, even at best, our objectors have supposed. It has further been urged by the literalists against the allegorical interpretation that the image of marriage had never, up to the date when the Song was written, been employed to denote a spiritual relationship; and that though it was subsequently so used by the prophets, yet even they never gave a spiritual turn to the antenuptial love which the Song delineates. Now were this fully true, it would have very little weight against the alle- gorical interpretation. In part it is true; and the reason why the Song differs from the prophetical writings in speaking of antenuptial as well as of nuptial love is, as we shall presently see, because in it the Beloved repre- sents not God but the Messiah. «In this respect the Song must be compared with Psalm xlv. It may also be conceded that before the date of these two pieces the image of even marriage, as symbolizing a spiritual rela- tionship, had been comparatively undeveloped. It is by that very circumstance that we are driven to the con- clusion that the Song was prior in order of time to the prophecies of Hosea: it was the special glory of the Song (following in the wake of Psalm xlv.) to unfold 58 THE SONG OF SONGS. the image which the prophets afterwards so largely employed. But the germs of the image had existed long before in the phrase " to go whoring after other gods," used repeatedly in the Pentateuch and the Book of Judges. It first occurs in Exod. xxxiv. 15, 16. That it there denotes a spiritual departure from the true God is shewn by the word "jealous" in ver. 14, form- ing part of the same sentence with vv. 15, 16: "Thou shalt worship no other god: for the Lord, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God;" and this ought not to have been overlooked or denied. The same is evident in Deut. xxxi. 16; Judg. II. 17; also Numb. xiv. 33. It may be that the phrase, as applied to the heathen Canaanites in Exod. xxxiv. 15, involves, along with its spiritual significance, a literal reference to the impure rites with which heathen worship clothed itself, as if in token of its spiritually adulterous origin. Or it may be that even there it refers purely to the spiritual cha- racter of the idolatry which, though in partial igno- rance of their error, the heathen practised; and it must be remembered that though used of the heathen, it is uniformly addressed not to them as a reproach, but as a divine warning to the instructed Israelites. But on this we decide not: it is to the present argument of no im- portance, the spiritual purport of the phrase in question being once established. An objection of a more general character which lias been implied rather than expressed against the alle- gorical interpretation of the Song is that so detailed an allegorical use of the conjugal relationship, with its INTRODUCTION". 59 preludes and accompaniments, to set fortli the highest spiritual truths, is altogether unparalleled. Here how- ever, even though we should condescend to argue the question on only the lowest grounds, we have the prac- tices of other Oriental nations to guide us. With the Hebrew Song have been compared various Indian, Per- sian, and Arabian poems of corresponding character; and amid all the differences which have been pointed out between them the one great fact remains, that the Easterns have been frequently wont, with much fulness of detail, to clothe their religious devotion in the garb of human love. The allegories of the Hindus and Muham- medans may not avail of themselves to establish the allegorical character of the Song of Songs; but they at least render nugatory much of the reasoning that some might be disposed to urge against it. If, however, argument a priori as to the character of the Song be admissible at all, we may venture to con- duct it on somewhat higher grounds. Let the question then be, What, on a cursory inspection of the Song, and in the knowledge that it formed part of the Bible, might we reasonably expect it to contain? It seems to speak, — nay, it speaks, — of love; and why should it not? "For my part," said Niebuhr, "I should deem some- thing wanting to the Bible if no expression were there found for the deepest and strongest of human feelings 1 ." No Christian need be ashamed to avow his concurrence in the sentiment which prompted this utterance. For nuptial love is older than the fall; and under the con- 1 Eelated by Bunsen to Kenan; Kenan, p. 147. GO THE SONG OF SONGS. ditions of our present existence, love antenuptial is the almost necessary prelude to love nuptial; and, without doubt, the volume of God's teaching not only recog- nizes, but consecrates those feelings of which the germs were by him emplanted in our original nature. But how then does it consecrate them? Not merely by illustrating their workings in the way in which we continually behold them illustrated in the scenes of ordinary life ; but rather by setting before us, in love's own language, that highest ideal of love both nuptial and antenuptial, the love of the Son of God to his earthly Church. It celebrates the great archetypal love of which all our loves are but the shadows. It points to the manifestation of that love in the Son of God's incarnation and death. This is what in Scripture we should justly expect ; and this is the especial office of the Song of Songs. Like the rest of the Old Testament generally, it speaks of Christ, and prepares the way for his coming. As other books reared up, on the basis of earthly sovereignties, the picture of Christ as universal king, or traced, in the familiar care with which Eastern shepherds tended their sheep, the imaged outlines of the care with which Christ should watch over his people, so the Song of Songs delineated, in the love of a faithful bridegroom to his bride, the supreme and immeasurable love of Christ to those who should be by him redeemed. And thus by singing of Christ it more truly and more effectually honoured human love than if it had sung of that and nothing beyond. Every lesson which the religiously minded litcralists would find in the Song is INTRODUCTION. 61 indeed therein implicitly contained ; not in the way they would have it, but in a better way. We see light there ; but it is in the light of the Son of God. §7- We must now bend our attention to some of the main points with respect to which those who concur in holding the Song to be thoroughly allegorical have differed from each other. And first then, who is the Beloved of whom the Song speaks? With well nigh one consentient voice, for more than a thousand years, Christian expositors answered, The Messiah. De Lyra first introduced into the Church the Jewish view which regarded the Beloved as God not incarnate ; a view whicli since his time has, no doubt, by Christians been not unfrequently held. That this view should prevail among the Jews cannot surprise us. The prophetical representations of the Jewish covenant as a marriage between God and his people imparted to it a prima faye probability ; and after Christ had once come, and still more after Chris- tians had expressly interpreted the Song of him, it would take firm root among the Jews from their un- happy opposition to Christianity and to the truth. In order to carry it through, the Targum forbore to identify the Beloved with the Solomon of in. 6—11, whom it regarded as the historical builder of the temple. This severance of the principal personage of the different 62 THE SONG OF SONGS. portions of the Song De Lyra rightly disallowed ; Lut lie was thereby drawn to the view which can hardly appear other than repulsive, that by Solomon is signified God : "nomine Salomonis, qui pacificus interpretatur, intelli- gitur ipse Deus secundum Hebrgeos; quia disponit omnia suaviter." For the identification of the Beloved with the Mes- siah rather than with God not incarnate the following arguments seem decisive. First, the Song speaks of antenuptial as well as of nuptial love : the day of the espousals is not described till III. 6 — 11. But in respect of the marriage between God and his people, the Jews always regarded it as ratified at Mount Sinai ; and though, it is true, the covenant there established was but a shadow of the covenant which was to be sealed on Calvary, yet it could hardly have been set aside, as invalid, in any representation from which the person of the Messiah was excluded. In other words, the ante- nuptial part of the Song points to the fact that the Beloved had not yet been fully displayed : God indeed he should be, yet not invisible, but manifest in the flesh. Then there is much beside in the Song which forces us to view the Beloved as one of woman born. He seems to stand throughout on the same level with the Bride. He proclaims himself of the same race with her by calling her sister, iv. 9 ; and she does the same by long- ing for him as her brother, yiii. 1. The intensely human descriptions of his person harmonize not with the majesty of God except as incarnate, II, 8, 9, 17; v. 2,9 — 16; vm. 14. Especially is this the case where INTRODUCTION. 63 they necessarily represent him as youthful, by setting forth either the darkness of his hair, V. 11, or the nimble- ness of his motions, 11*8, 9, 17; Viil. 14. What more- over could we make of " the crown wherewith his mother crowned him," as applied to the invisible God, in. 11? Furthermore we have the correspondence with Psalm xlv., where the words " thy God," ver. 7, sufficiently shew that it is the Messiah who is addressed. And lastly we have the tenor of the whole language of the New Testament ; and specially of those passages of it in which the Song is indirectly referred to (see above, pp. 53 — 55). The words of John the Baptist, which de- pend so manifestly on the Song, John III. 29, may above all be instanced as proving that by the Bride- groom the Messiah is intended. But it will be asked, How came it then to pass that the image of the Messiah as the future Bridegroom of the Church was by the Hebrew prophets no further un- folded ? The answer will be found in considering the office which the prophets were more directly called upon to fulfil. They had to bring back the people to the observance of that relation which God had established with them before planting them in the land of Canaan. Hosea here, in his opening chapter, strikes the funda- mental note which runs through all the prophetical writings from him to Malachi. For this purpose the marriage on which they had to dwell was the marriage of God and of Israel at Sinai ; and this particular appli- cation of the image of the bridal union naturally inter- fered with that which the Song had recommended. Still 64 THE SOXG OF SONGS. though they diverted the imagery of the Song, they did not altogether lose sight of its contents. There is pro- bably some degree of reference to it in the title which Isaiah bestows upon the Messiah, The Prince of Peace, IX. 6 ; and it is in allusion either to the Song or to Psalm xlv. that he writes in xxxiii. 17, " Thine eyes shall see the king in his beauty." It may moreover be observed that the Song of Songs embodies the last great religious glow of the Solomonic period of royal splen- dour as revived in the kingdom of Judah in the days of Jehoshaphat. As years rolled on, the impression made by their subsequent troubles upon the Jewish nation, and the unfolded consciousness of sin, brought the priestly office of the future Messiah more directly into view ; and for the purpose of setting this forth representations of a different kind became necessary. § 8. Oue next question is, Whom shall we understand by the Bride? Here De Lyra did better service. He pointed out that through all ages God's Church had been but one; and that if the Song spake of her both before and after Christ's coming, it must needs, though without destroying her ideal unity, speak of her both in her more restricted and in her more catholic form. An endeavour has however been made to view the Jewish nation, both before and since Christ's coming, as the Bride of the Song; from direct interest in which INTRODUCTION. G5 the Christian Church will thus be in great measure excluded. Had this view proceeded from those who regard the fortunes of the Jewish nation, not of the Church, as the general theme of Old Testament pro- phecy, the maintenance of it could have occasioned no surprise. It is urged however by Hengstenberg, who thereby in some measure sunders this Book from the rest of the Old Testament, as specially Israelitish in its contents. It obtains moreover a fragmentary support from some Latin expositors of the post-Roman period, who, instead of rigidly maintaining the unity of the female character of the Song, refer some passages to the "Synagogue" rather than the "Church:" e.g. VI. 12, 13. The first and fundamental objection to this view is that it is unproved; and that without proof we have no right to assume the Song to be more specially Jewish than the rest of the Old Testament. The identification of the Shulamith of VI. 13 with the Jewish nation rests on a misapprehension of the meaning of the words "Return, return:" see the comment on that passage. Moreover the Israelites, regarded in a national point of view, are represented in the Song by the Mother of the Bride, see on I. 6, &c. : the Bride therefore herself must needs be different: she may according to circumstances, as De Lyra shewed, be either Israelitish or Catholic, but she is, in either case, not a nation, but a church, which the Jews now are not. The foundation for Ilengstenberg's view seems to be mainly the false as- sumption that the passage V. 2 — 8 describes the present 5 GG THE SONG OF SONGS. spiritual rejection of a great portion of the Jewish na- tion; a rejection to be followed by the final readmittance of the nation to God's favour. But parts of that very passage are decisive against his view. Ver. 5 implies a true self-denying devotion of heart, such as the Jew- ish nation generally, since the coming of Christ, has not yet exhibited: see this discussed in the comment on V. 5, 6. So again with respect to ver. 8, "Declare ye to him that I am sick with love:" how can it be said that the Jewish nation in its present state is sick with love to Christ? Are even those expectations of a Messiah which the Jews now erroneously retain either more spi- ritual in their views of his person, or more universally diffused throughout the members of the nation, than on the day on which they disowned him at his appearing? There is an unfavourable significance even in the fact that the Jewish interpretation of the Song of Songs, unlike in this respect to the Christian, should have uni- formly failed to discern the Messiah in it. It will how- ever be borne in mind that our discourse is here only of those Jews who retain their Jewish nationality; not of the numerous converts whom Judaism has given to the Christian Church, and of whom, though not always free at the first from Jewish prejudices on minor points, the Church has numbered many amongst her most illus- trious members. May the time come when that number shall be largely swelled; when the witness of the Old Testament to the kingdom of Jesus of Nazareth shall be universally recognized, and when the hope shall be ful- filled which the Christian Church has in all ages uni- INTRODUCTION. 67 formly cherished, of the general reception of the mem- bers of the Jewish nation into the Christian spiritual fold! § 9- Christ being thus the Beloved of the Song, and the Church the Bride, how far may the Song itself be viewed as of a historical or historico-prophetical cha- racter? How far does it set forth, with poetical delinea- tion, the events that had already been or yet should be? That a story runs through the whole seems, when once pointed out, sufficiently clear. It is implied in the consecutiveness of the several pictures which the Song contains ; as also in their mutual relations to each other. Compare, for instance, the picture of vin. 5 with that of III. 6; or again, the picture of VIII. 5 with the longings expressed in vin. 1. And what else can these pictures well represent than the different conditions of the earthly Church, and the acts of Christ toward it? If some of the psalms be historical, e.g. Psalms cv, CVI, or even historico-prophetical, e. g. Psalm evil. 33 seqq., why should not also the Song be the same? And why more- over should not a certain historical order reign through- out it? Extravagant then as many of the historicizing interpretations since the days of De Lyra have been, they have erred rather in the application of their funda- mental principle than in the maintenance of it. The violence done by them severally to different passages of the Song does not shew that no historical interpretation 5—2 G8 THE SONG OF SONGS. should be attempted. It only illustrates the need which exists for laying down, at the outset, the limits which such interpretation ought to observe. Now if the general theme of the Song be the love of Christ and the Church, it may be reasonably presumed that the events of the Israelitish history could only be introduced into it so far as they bore directly on the hopes that were entertained of the coming of Christ at the time that the Song was written. This is our first canon of historical interpretation ; and by it most of the narrative which De Lyra, in imitation of the Targum, imports into the Song is at once excluded; for it does not sufficiently illustrate the "Let him kiss me" with which the Church, in the very opening of the Song, expresses her longing for her Lord. Again as to the future, it is clear that the interest with which the author of the Song would anticipate the details of the evangelic records would be immeasurably greater than that which he would feel for any details of the prospects of the Church after Christ's ascension. We must therefore at once abandon all interpretations which make the Song speak of the establishment of the Church under Constantine, or of its reformation by Luther, and not of the incarnation and death of Christ. And indeed all details of the post-apostolic history of the Christian Church must have been so remote to the hopes of the sacred singer, except so far as they fulfilled any promises already vouchsafed, that it is not easy to be- lieve that they should have been generally in any wise revealed to him. INTRODUCTION. 63 We must moreover avoid seeking for historical de- tails in the description which the Song contains of the person of Christ and of the graces of the Church. If the direct object of these descriptions be to illustrate the love of Christ and of his Church for each other, we must not substitute a song of history for a song of love, and so deprive the Song of Songs of that which is its espe- cial glory. Nor again must we tear asunder the differ- ent parts of such descriptions. There are some passages of the Song of which, even when viewed by themselves, the meaning is so far clear, that the student who has once apprehended it will never allow himself to be induced, by the exigencies of any scheme, to abandon it. The passage in. 9 — 11 sets forth the passion of Christ. The passage IV. 16 fore- tells the descent upon the Church of the Holy Spirit. The passage vin. 1 represents the longing of the Church for the advent of Christ in the flesh : it might, taken by itself, represent the longing for either the first advent or the second. The passage vin. 5 represents, almost certainly, that union of the Church with Christ for which in vin. 1 she had prayed. Only inferior in im- portance to the above is the passage II. 11 — 13, which represents the heralding of the gospel. The true inter- pretation of the Song will necessarily guide itself by these landmarks. It is fair to presume that the order of events deline- ated in the Song is generally chronological. Yet it need not be wholly or exclusively chronological. A strict chronological sequence of the events foretold is 70 THE SONG OF SONGS. seldom found in Old Testament prophecy ; and we may repeat of the Song what has been said of the latter part of the writings of Isaiah, that in it " each successive scene is described as in itself complete, and the order of events no farther indicated than that some things were to stand in a relation of priority to others 1 ." Definite adherence to chronological order would indeed in the Song be at variance with the centralism by which, as will hereafter be shewn, its different sections are distin- guished : the leading theme of each being indicated in the central part of the section, and the descriptions which illustrate this being grouped around it. And as regards the mutual relations of the several sections, two contiguous sections may be chronologically arranged in respect of their leading themes, while yet the events of the one overlap those of the other. Or, lastly, two sections may delineate the history of the same period in two different aspects. Even in regard of the past, we probably have the history of the same period of David's life pictured in two different lights in Psalms xxn, XXIII 2 : how much more might two dissimilar, though not (as it should prove) inconsistent, representations be necessary for the purpose of setting forth with any ade- quacy the dim outlines of the unknown future ? 1 Fairbairn on Prophecy, p. 1 70. 2 See my Introd. to the Psalms, I. pp. 144, 145. INTRODUCTION. 71 § 10. That wliicli lias passed and still passes In the history of the Church is largely repeated in the experiences of individual souls. There is an analogy between the deal- ings of -God with mankind generally and his dealings with men severally ; between the illumination and sanc- tification of the whole Church and that of each of her members. It is this which so greatly extends the bear- ing of the Bible records. From the history of the nation of Israel the individual believer derives, and rightly derives, lessons of importance for his own con- duct. It cannot then surprise us that many among the pious students of Scripture should have beheld in the Song of Songs a picture of the communing of the soul of man with its Redeemer. If moreover the patient wait- ings, the anxious searchings, the raptures at the joy of his presence, which are here delineated be such as ac- cord with what they themselves have practically known, who will venture to maintain that their application of the Song can be fundamentally illegitimate or unjust? Still the private history of each soul is not the same. There is no warrant for supposing that the order of each man's experiences must exactly accord with the order of the experiences of the Church. The earthly dealings of God himself with men are various rather than uniform ; and one man may, without being on that account less under the influence of divine grace, have to pass several times through trials from which another may be altogether spared. The Song of Songs involves 72 THE SONG OF SONGS. too definite a spiritual history to admit of being applied as a consecutive whole to the progress of every single soul. Its partial accordance with what we ourselves have experienced, or with what we know to have been the experience of others, must not lead us to press the correspondence between its descriptions and our own souls' histories too far. The individual reference of the Song belongs rather to the province of legitimate application than of strict interpretation ; and such appli- cation is necessarily restricted by certain limiting condi- tions. So far as the several passages of the Song can be traced as corresponding to passages in the soul's his- tory, so far, and no further, may the existence of a correspondence be determinately asserted. We are confirmed in this view by certain passages of the Song, e. g. Yl. 8, 9, which militate against the absolute identification of the Bride with the soul of any individual man. How, in that case, could the dove of Christ be but one ? If we turn to the commentary of Gregory of Nyssa on this passage, we find that he is here constrained to make the individual soul give place to the whole company of the redeemed, and thus, though he does not confess it, to mar the consistency of his general interpretation. His illustration is taken, not unfairly, from our Saviour's words, Joh. XVII. 21, " That they all may be one ; as thou, Father, art in me, and I in thee, that they also may be one in us." And perhaps it is a lesson which most of us need in some measure to learn, that solemn as is our own individual standing before God, we have yet to look not only on INTRODUCTION". 73 our own things, " but every man also on the things of others :" that all-important as is our individual accept- ance, we yet rise truly highest as we realize our position as humble members in the Church universal. For as- suredly, in the declarations of Scripture, it is the whole glorious company of the redeemed that Christ is most distinctly declared to have desired to present unto him- self, and that is most plainly honoured with the en- nobling name of the Bride, the wife of the Lamb. There is no single word by which the form of the Song of Songs can be adequately described. It is in the main dramatical, yet it does not conform with strict- ness to the rules of the regular drama ; and the most judicious of even the literalizing dramatical interpreters (Ewald, Ginsburg) do not suppose it to have been in- tended for representation. In fact, the contemporaneous- ness of some of the events depicted in successive scenes, and the way in which verses like II. 15, IV. 6 break in upon the dramatic action, forbid us to view it as a drama proper. But, on the other hand, if any should still wish to designate the Song a chain of idyls, he must withal remember that these idyls stand to one another in a definite order of sequence, that they tend to a definite conclusion, and that they embody not merely an idea, but a connected history. In modern times the importance of recognizing the natural divisions of the Song has been undisputedly 74 THE SONG OF SONGS. acknowledged. It lias been generally supposed that the Song contains from five to seven main portions. The true number is six. The endings of the first two, as also of the last but one, are easily recognized by the refrain at II. 7, III. 5, VIII. 4. And it is almost univer- sally agreed that another portion ends at V. 1. How far the portion which commences at V. 2 extends has been a matter of less certainty. Some would make it termi- nate at VI. 9 ; others at VI. 13 ; wishing, apparently, that the different portions of the Song should not differ too widely in length. But the poet himself lias marked the true termination of this portion at v. 8, by the simi- larity of the language of that verse to that of the other refrains. At the very end of the Song, the last two verses may be more properly viewed as an epilogue or conclusion to the whole than as belonging to the sixth main portion. Some recent criticism has so viewed them. The Song then thus divides itself: I. 2 — II. 7; ii. 8 — in. 5; in. 6 — v. 1; v. 2 — 8; v. 9 — vin. 4; Yiu # 5 — 12; with the conclusion VIII. 13, 14. The correctness of this division is confirmed by the centralism which thus discloses itself in the longer groups. A study of the Hebrew psalms reveals the circumstance that it was one of the most favourite arti- fices of Hebrew poetry to distinguish the central verses of an ode or of a portion of an ode from the rest by some peculiarity of construction, thus directing atten- tion to them as the verses in which was contained or implied the essence or leading thought of the whole. In the Song of Songs the central verses are correspond- INTRODUCTION. 75 ingly emphaticized by tlieir enigmatical character and bv their isolation in meaning from the context around them. This is manifestly the case with the two verses II. 15, iv. 6, which, as a computation of the verses will readily shew, form the centres of the second and third groups of the Song. The centre of the fifth group is in like manner marked by the isolated and highly enig- matical passage VI. 10 — 13 ; and hence if that group end at vill. 4, it must needs begin, by the number of the verses, at v. 9. In the first group the central pas- sage is I. 9 — 1 1 ; though it is, perhaps, not so strongly marked as in the second, third, and fifth groups. In the shorter groups alone, the fourth and sixth, there is no apparent centralism. Certain relations, not entirely accidental, may more- over be observed between the lengths of the several groups. The first and third are of equal lengths : they contain each twenty-three verses. The second group, of fifteen verses, is as long as the fourth and sixth to- gether ; and the fifth, of thirty-eight verses, is exactly as long as the united first and second, or as the united second and third. Again, the fifth and sixth groups together are exactly twice as long as the first or as the third group. It was perhaps also intended that the con- cluding passage of the third group, IV. 12 — V. 1, should stand out as the central passage of the entire Song; which (from I. 2 to VIII. 14) consists of one hundred and sixteen verses. It will be seen from our commentary that the several groups have all their respective themes ; which may 76 TUE SONG OF SONGS. here be conveniently set down beforehand. The theme of the first group is the anticipation of Christ's coming: the second represents the waiting for that blessed time : in the third he is arrived, and we have there the descrip- tion of the espousal and its fruits. The fourth group delineates the subsequent bodily departure of the Bride- groom from his Bride ; the fifth his spiritual presence with her; and the sixth their complete and final re- union. § ^2. An introduction to the Song of Songs would be defective without some endeavour to trace the historical basis on which its expectations partly rested, and the connexion of its prophetical announcements with the circumstances of the time at which it was written. As regards the former half of the Song the task is not difficult. The anticipations of the Messiah had through- out the earlier period of the Old Testament history been gradually increasing in definiteness. AVe read them in the promise to Abraham, and in the blessing of Jacob ; in the inspired soothsaying of Balaam, and in the So- lemn declaration of Moses ; in the song of Hannah ; and, more determinately, in the promise to David through Nathan, and in the psalms composed by David subsequently to the utterance of that promise. They may be said to have culminated for a time in the joyous and triumphant Psalm lxxii, composed by Solomon on his accession to the throne of Israel; and they shone INTRODUCTION. 77 forth very "brightly during the prosperous reign of Je- hoshaphat in the glorious Psalm XLV, with which the Song of Songs is in much so closely allied. It was mainly from that psalm that the author of the Song drew the image of the nuptials which he so largely un- folded ; and it is thus to the hopes which were cherished during Jehoshaphat's reign that the origin of the Song may, through Psalm xlv, be indirectly traced. The influence of the circumstances of that period shews it- self markedly in one feature of the Song which it has in common with Psalm XLV. There is in it no direct prophetical exhibition of the sufferings of the future Messiah, or of the severe conflict which in his own per- son he should have to sustain 1 . His death is veiled under the symbolism of the myrrh, but it is not expli- citly declared. Even in the magnificent delineation of his espousal of his Bride in III. 6 — 11, it is only the glories, not the bitterness, of his passion that are held up to our gaze. Those alone were prepared to receive the doctrine of a suffering Messiah who had themselves been humbled by God's chastening hand, and were penetrated by a deep sense of sin ) and of this, during the reign of Jehoshaphat, we find but little trace. There 1 Cf. part of an eloquent passage from Roos, as quoted by Delitzsch, p. 59: "Es wird der Sohn Gottes im Hohenlied als holdselig, freundlich, schon und herrlich beschrieben, aber das Geheimniss seines Kreuzes ist darin nicht deutlich geoffenbaret. Der Sohn Gottes wird Konig genannt, er wird als ein weidender Hirt, als ein Herr seines Weinbergs und Gartens, als ein Freund der Seelen, die seine Braut sind, und als ein milder Herr aller andern, die einigermassen mit ihm verbunden sind, vorgestellt, von seinem Priesterthum aber wird keine Meldung gethan." 78 THE SONG OF SONGS. are consequently throughout the Song no open indications of any struggle of Christ unto victory, of any triumph through the power of endm - ance, such as we find in the psalms of David. The secrets of the mountain of myrrh and of the hill of frankincense exist, but they are not disclosed ; nor would it be suspected from a perusal of the Song alone that the crown wherewith the heavenly Bridegroom should be crowned of his earthly mother would be tendered by her to him in scorn, and that she would be but an unwilling agent in bringing out the fulness of glory which now through his endurance of her bitter persecutions rests for evermore upon him. Shall we deem it a defect in the Song of Songs that it thus veils from our view all that is painful in the earthly career of the Beloved of whom it sings? Rather let us remember that every side of the truth cannot to the apprehension of man be brought out at once. If the Bible teaches us to weep with them that weep, it no less teaches us to rejoice with them that rejoice. There may be piety in gladness as well as in sorrow. And it is one result of the peculiar aspect in which the career of the Incarnate Son of God is in the Song of Songs presented to us, that all lawful earthly grandeur is thereby conse- crated as the material type of the moral grandeur of what he accomplished; that so our natural taste for the magnificent may be not rudely cast aside as vain, but rather made a means of leading us to him whose name is above every name, and whose glories we may right- fully adore. While however in the Song everything connected INTRODUCTION. 79 with the coming of the Beloved is thus exhibited in unclouded splendour, it is not concealed that dark tri- bulations and anxious searchings must precede his ap- proach. His advent shall be a summer's brightness, but a winter must first pass away: he shall be found at length by her who hath longed for him, but there must first be a season during which she shall seek him and find him not. Had the Song proceeded from Solomon, all reference to even these heavinesses would perhaps have been wanting ; but they could not well be passed over by those who lived in Israel in the days of Ahab and his successors, or even by the singers of Judah after that a Jehoram and an Athaliah sat upon the throne of their father Jehoshaphat. Thenceforth the expectations of the golden days of the Messiah required an exercise of living faith; for many hearts were sick because of hope deferred. And in such living faith, without doubt, the Song of Songs was written; and by its comforts and encouragements we may well believe that many hearts were sustained. Vivid nevertheless as is the picture contained in the first three sections, or earlier half, of the Song, it presents to us only those glories which older seers had in various ways also heralded. It far exceeds all previous prophe- cies in detail of delineation; yet there is hardly any essential feature in it which can be regarded as abso- lutely or strikingly new. With respect to the latter half of the Song the case is different. The distinctness with which it is there unfolded that the coming of the Messiah will not of itself be the final termination of all SO THE SONG OF SONGS. earthly expectation and anxiety is unparalleled not merely in all earlier Scripture, but throughout the whole of the Old Testament. Psalm II. had implied that the enthronement of the Son of God as king upon the holy lil 11 of Zion should still be followed by conflicts with the rebellious and disobedient; but nowhere else in the Old Testament do we find a passage which speaks as Cant. v. 2 — 8 speaks of a withdrawal of the Messiah from the Church for whose salvation he has once ap- peared. If it be asked, How was such withdrawal fore- known ? our first answer must needs be, that it pleased God to reveal it. Yet as divine revelations were never inopportunely made, the question still arises, Had the Poet been previously fitted by any historical teaching to accept such revelation, and to recognize the withdrawal which it announced ? One event then there was, unique of its kind, which, if the date that we have assigned to the Song be correct, would undoubtedly serve as the basis whereon the pic- ture of the withdrawal of the Beloved Messiah mi in 11. 17. 96 THE SONG OF SONGS. [i. 3. witness the prophecies of Jacob and Moses, the song of Hannah, the promise by Nathan, and the psalms of David and Solomon. There may also be in this pas- sage a reference, as Bossuet remarks, to the circumstance that the name Messiah signifies Anointed. The virgins. The mention of the virgins, at the very outset of this Song, as the lovers of the Bridegroom, precludes any other than an allegorical interpretation. The same con- clusion follows from such alternations of the singular and plural, me — ■ us, as that which Ave have in the next verse, and on which it will be sufficient here once for all to remark. The virgins are in effect identical with the Bride : they represent in their severalty the commu- nities and individuals of whom the Church consists, while the Bride is the Church in her ideal entirety. The same remark applies to Psalm xlv, where, more- over, the mere external distinction between the virgins and the Bride is greater than in this Song, the former there appearing as the attendants of the latter. Draw thou me. An anticipation of the great Christian doc- trine that it is Christ who must draw us unto himself ; and this both by his name, i. e. by the display of his love, cf. Joh. xii. 32, " I, if I be lifted up from the earth," — on the cross, — "will draw all men unto me;" and also by the gracious influence of his Spirit, cf. Joh. VI. 44. The Icing. This title, as Origen rightly judges, is here made prominent in order to shew the richness of the chambers into which the Bride is brought. Hath brought me. The prophetic preterite : the Bride antici- pates the time when she should be brought. Into his I. 4.] THE ANTICIPATION. 97 chambers. In other words, he hath made known to me the riches of his grace : see especially Eph. I — in. And this again in two ways : first by his own personal pres- ence in the flesh on earth, Matth. xni. 17; and secondly by the teaching of his Spirit, 1 Cor. II. 10. It is in a king's chambers that his costliest treasures are to be seen. Be we glad, &c. For the honour put upon them, in the close intercourse with Christ into which they have been admitted. The upright love thee. This in- terprets the last line of the preceding verse, " the virgins love thee." The "upright" and the "virgins" are one and the same. Yv. 5, 6. The Church describes her own present state. daughters of Jerusalem. The daughters of Jerusalem come before us again in n. 7; III. 5, 10; v. 8, 16; viil. 4. The exact phrase is not found else- where in the Old Testament. It is evidently of import- ance that we should determine whom the Daughters of Jerusalem represent. Origen took them for the rejected Jews, the daughters of the Jerusalem that " now is, and is in bondage with her children"; "enemies" "as con- cerning the gospel," but " as touching the election, be- loved for the fathers' sakes"; but looking with disdain on the new Gentile Church. This view is unsustained by sufficient proof; and it does not harmonize with the early period at which the Song of Songs was written. On the other hand, Hengstenberg supposes the Daughters of Jerusalem to be the Gentile nations, allying them- selves as spiritual daughters to Jerusalem their mother- church. In support of this he refers mainly to Ezek. 7 98 THE SONG OF SONGS. [i. 5. XVI. 61 and Psalm lxxxvii. But these are both of later date than the Song of Songs, and could not there- fore have furnished the foundation on which the imagery of the latter rested; while neither do they recall it with sufficient definiteness to be accepted as interpretations of it. The circumstance that the phrase " daughters of Jerusalem" is confined in the Old Testament to the Song of Songs will lead us to seek the explanation of it primarily from the Song itself. Now in six of the seven passages in which they are here mentioned, they plainly play the part of spectators of what is otherwise passing: they are in short strictly the chorus of the drama, the visible exponents of the feelings of the audience. The reason of their appearance in III. 10, where the same is not so manifestly the case, may be best considered Avhen we arrive at that passage. Guided by the other six passages, we shall properly assume them to be the mem- bers of the Church of Israel in their contemplative ca- pacity; not necessarily different persons, in their outer being, from the virgins of ver. 3, but yet representing them in a different point of view, with reference solely to their intelligent and emotional survey of what is pass- ing, and without regard to their own spiritual state. Any allusion to the latter would have required that they should be styled not Daughters of Jerusalem, but 1 laughters of Zion ; the fundamental difference between the terms Jerusalem and Zion being that the one denotes only the inhabited city, the other the scat of the Lords presence. For the sake of variety they are, of course, interchangeable, but where the one term is definitely I. 5.] THE ANTICIPATION. 99 and systematically preferred to the other, its strict im- port should be observed. The above explanation of the "daughters of Jerusalem" is thoroughly confirmed by Our Blessed Saviour's use of the phrase in the only other passage of Scripture in -which it meets us, Luke xxiii. 28. He was addressing the company of people that followed him with lamentation to Calvary: "Daugh- ters of Jerusalem, weep not for me, but weep for your- selves and for your children." Such words from him who knew all hearts shew plainly that their grief was not of the highest order : it was the grief of passionate excitement rather than of spiritual anguish ; the grief of spectators who felt a natural and spontaneous sympathy with the sorrows which it was their lot to witness, but not necessarily of believers who recked that those sorrows were fraught to themselves with deep and lasting in- terest. And it may be well to bear in mind that it is possible to survey, as Daughters of Jerusalem, the loving intercourse of the Bridegroom and Bride, possible to peruse the Song of Songs with 'an outward appreciation of its various beauties, without being truly drawn, as virgins, to him who must, if loved at all, be loved in the spirit. As the tents of Kedar, as the curtains of Solo- mon. That is, I am black as the one, yet comely as the other. They stand in mutual contrast, like the black- ness and the comeliness in the preceding line. The descendants of Kedar, one of the sons of Ishmael, were probably among the Arabs witli whom the Israelites were best acquainted. The special mention of them here is particularly appropriate, because the name Kedar sig- 7—2 100 THE SONG OF SONGS. [i. 5. nifies black. The blackness of their tents mainly arose from their being covered either with goatskins, or with cloths of goats' hair. In such materials there is an ap- pearance of gloominess, but no essential deformity ; and accordingly blackness is here the emblem of tribulation, not (as it has been too generally taken) of sin. The following verse will more fully explain this. Respecting any curtains of Solomon we have no details. It may be that we are simply to assume them to be some definite hangings of great beauty and richness ; the curtains, for example, of a palanquin, such as that in which in III. 6 — 11 the heavenly Solomon is represented as ap- proaching. On the other hand, the meaning may be that darkness and loveliness might co-exist, even as in tent-hangings, which notwithstanding their sombreness of hue, were yet for richness and costliness worthy of a Solomon. That the sun hath fiercely scanned me. The sun, from its scorching power, is used in various pas- sages of Scripture as the emblem of tribulation : see Psalm cxxi. 6; Isaiah xlix. 10; Matth. xin. 6; Rev. vn. 16. My mother s sons. The Mother of the Bride is here the nation of Israel. As it was through the me- dium of the national institutions of the Israelites that their cliurchly character was brought to light, and on their national unity that their privileged pre-eminence as the elect of God rested, the Church might be not improperly represented as the daughter of the nation. The mother's sons will then evidently be the several members of the nation, from the king, his nobles, and his officers, downwards, viewed however only in their I. 6.] THE ANTICIPATION. 101 civil dealings, in their relation to the State, not in their relation to the Church. For this reason the Bride, al- though she calls them her mother's sons, abstains from speaking of them as her brethren : their immediate rela- tion to herself does not come under consideration. We must in analysing the imagery of this Song refrain from extending its details, and from drawing inferences which, inasmuch as they would be unsuited to his purpose, the author of the Song has avoided. Have been angry icitJi me. We have in this passage one important clue for the determination of the date at which the Song was writ- ten; and upon this subject we have already spoken in the Introduction. The starting-point of those civil pro- ceedings of the Israelites whereby the Church had so grievously suffered was the rebellion of the ten tribes against the sovereignty of the house of David. Upon this had followed the erection of the rival kingdom, with its own separate head; and then upon this the measures whereby Jeroboam had made Israel to sin : the public establishment of idolatry at Dan and at Bethel, insti- tuted with the avowed object of preventing the resort of the people to the mountain where the Lord had fixed the seat of his presence; the unauthorized consecration of a new body of priests to minister in the high places ; and the ordinance of a new feast in the place of those enjoined by the law of Moses. On the accession of Ahab to the throne, and his alliance with the Tyrian Jezebel, yet worse had succeeded, the public sanction of the worship of Baal. And although, in respect of this latter, a general reformation had been made by the 102 THE SONG OF SONGS. [i. G. remorseless severity of Jehu, yet the sins originally in- troduced by Jeroboam still held their way with unabated power: Israel still kept aloof from the courts of Zion, and the worship which the Lord had enjoined was still publicly disregarded. Which things being so, the Church of Israel might well complain of the treatment she had received from the rulers and princes of the nation. They have made me the keeper of the vineyards: my vineyard, that which is mine own, I have not kept. The vineyard, the enclosed and cultivated plat within the limits of which lie the scenes of the vine-dresser's labour, represents the organized sphere in which the ministrations of the Church are to move. Had the Church been doing the work entrusted to her in the way ordained and enjoined of God, had she been nur- turing the religious life of Israel from her own appointed metropolis on Mount Zion, she would then, in the lan- guage of the Song, have been keeping her own vineyard. But from this the political condition of the nation had hindered her. Israel would not come up to worship in the courts of Zion. And therefore the Church must find for herself other means, adapted to the special exigencies of the times, of labouring in the holy cause ; and the means on which she lit consisted in the establishment of colleges of holy disciples, " the sons of the prophets," at different centres in the kingdom of the ten tribes, to act as unobtrusive nurseries of piety, and to minister instruction in God's law, as opportunity might offer, to the districts around. The spheres of action of these several centres of religious life were the vineyards in I. 6.] THE ANTICIPATION. 103 which the Church was now toiling, being no longer able to cultivate to its full extent the vineyard originally assigned her. We read of such colleges at Bethel, at Jericho, and at Gilgal (2 Kings II. 3, 5; IV. 38). They had doubtless been principally established through the zeal of Elijah and Elisha. Earlier germs of them have been sometimes traced in the days of Samuel ; but it is doubtful whether the prophetical companies of his time continued to exist through the reigns of David and Solomon, when all the organization of religious ministry and worship was concentrated at Jerusalem. It has, in the Introduction, been already observed, that it was probably from a member of one of the prophetical col- leges that the present Song proceeded. There is much interest in comparing the interpretation given of this passage by Cassiodorus and Bede. They take the " vine- yard" of the primitive Christian Church at Jerusalem: the " vineyards," of the many churches which were planted abroad in consequence of the dispersion to which the persecution of the church at Jerusalem gave rise. This interpretation, as it stands, is not admissible, for two reasons : first, because its point of view belongs to the history of the New Testament, not of the Old ; and secondly, because that multiplication of the vineyards of which the Bride speaks in the Song is evidently to her a theme of mourning, rather than of rejoicing : she has lost the vineyard which she most prized. Still the interpretation harmonizes in some respects so remarkably, and yet so undesignedly, with ours, that it does, in effect, substantially confirm it. 104 THE SONG OF SONGS. [i. 7. Vv. 7, 8. The Church longs for her Saviour's pre- sence ; and this all the more, because of her present comparatively forlorn condition. Tell me, thou, &c. She apostrophizes her promised Lord. Where feedest thou thy flock, where restest it at noon ? The force of the question lies in the "where": she desires to find and to behold the object of her love. As for the rest, she knows that the office of Christ will be both to sustain and to refresh his people ; in other words, to feed them, and to rest them. These are two main parts of the shepherd's task. Noon is mentioned simply as the season of rest ; the season, when, in the heat of the day, rest for the sheep is necessary. Others, as Cassiodorus, press it to symbolize the heat of persecution or tempta- tion. Observe that although the Church had not yet beheld her Beloved, she nevertheless represents him as already engaged in his pastoral work. Why should I be as a veiled one? That is, Why should I be forced to wear the semblance of a harlot (ef. Gen. XXXVIII. 14, 15), wandering about to seek for a lover when there is none that beareth any genuine love to me? The whole period of the schism, from the days of llehoboam to those of Hezekiah, was, more especially among the ten tribes, a bitter time of trial for the Church of Israel. The severance of the ten tribes from the dominion of the house of David, from which house it had been de- clared that the Messiah should spring, made all the pro- mises of a Messiah appear delusive and visionary ; and in longing after her promised Saviour the Church seemed like a wanderer, sighing after one that had no I. 7.] THE ANTICIPATION. 105 existence. Various interpretations have been given of the word rVft^, but on the whole veiled, as explained above, seems the most probable. By the flocks of thy companions. The companions or fellows of Christ (cf. Psalm xlv. 7) are the false shepherds of Israel (cf. Ezek. xxxiv.) ; oppressive rulers, self-consecrated priests, lying teachers. So, substantially, Cassiodorus and Justus Orgelitanus, who, following Augustine, take them of the heretics " qui gregem deceptorum hominum sibi aggregant." It was by such, and by their flocks, i.e. by those under their influence, that the Church, when she came in contact with them, was liable to be mocked and despised. If thou knowest not, &c. Some take this as the reply of Christ himself. But it may with more dramatic propriety be regarded as the wholesome counsel of the Chorus of the Daughters of Jerusalem, through whom, as in the Greek drama, the author utters the lessons which he himself desires directly to enforce. Go thy way forth in the footsteps of the flock. The way in which the Church must look «and watch for her pro- mised Lord is by diligently and patiently pursuing meanwhile her own proper work. Her flock had strayed from her : she must not on that account aban- don it, but must rather follow after it, to the end that she may recover it. Most interpreters explain these words of following in the exemplary footsteps of the righteous that have gone before ; but they thus separate the flock of the present clause from the kids of the next, whom it is the office of the Church to feed. Beside the shepherds' 1 tents. That is, beside the tents of the false 106 THE SONG OF SONGS. [i. 8. shepherds, of whom the fair one had spoken in the pre- ceding verse, and whose rude gibes and contemptuous looks she keenly felt. Even in the presence of such rudeness and contempt, she must still labour on at the charge assigned her : if her kids had strayed to the evil shepherds' tents, even by those tents she must not hesitate to seek them: she must not shrink from en- countering wickedness if only so she may win back the unwary to the truth : like Elijah she must not fear to stand before Ahab, like Amos she must, despite the threats of Amaziah the priest, continue to lift up her voice at Bethel, if only so she may turn the heart of the children to the fathers, and may tend, even in the dark and cloudy day, the kids for whom she is respon- sible. Vv. 9 — 11. These and the six following verses, which form altogether the centre-piece of the first por- tion of the Song, do not follow in strict dramatical sequence upon what had preceded. They are rather to be taken by themselves, as a picture of the inner inter- course of the Church and Christ. In the midst of her loneliness and sorrows, which the preceding dramatic passage had exhibited to us, the Church has a gracious vision of Christ's succouring love ; which accordingly stands in the same relation to what had gone before as the communion of an individual soul with Christ does to the man's outward history. To the steeds in the chariots of Pharaoh have I compared thee. As regards the TDD7, the word HDD is here collective ; and the * is paragogic. The words are those of Christ address- I. 9.] THE ANTICIPATION. 107 ing the Church. The general sense is : Notwithstanding thy apparent loneliness and distress, divine might from on high so waits upon thy watchings and thy efforts, that thou mayest compare and successfully compete with the proudest array of worldly force. Horses were, in the sacred language of the Old Testament, one of the standard symbols of worldly, and therefore presump- tuous, strength. It had in Deut. XVII. 16 been com- manded that whenever the Israelites should have a king over them like the nations round about, he should refrain from furnishing himself with a multitude of horses; and in particular, that he should not "cause the people to return to Egypt, to the end that he should multiply horses." The remembrance of this, and also of the fact that the strength of the Pharaoh of the Exodus had been displayed in his horses, chariots and horsemen (Exod. xiv. 9, 17, 23), naturally gave rise to the associations which the mention of horses subse- quently suggested. Hence the continual repudiation in the Old Testament of trust in horses for safety : cf. Psalm xx. 7; xxxiii. 17; cxlvii. 10; Prov. xxi. 31 ; Isaiah xxxi. 1 ; Hosea I. 7. Comely are thy cheeks in •» the circlet. " The circlet or coiffure here intended was probably similar in character to the modern Persian head-dress ; which is described as consisting of two or three rows of pearls, worn round the head, beginning on the forehead, and descending down the cheek and under the chin, so that the face seems, as it were, set in pearls." (Olearius, ap. Harmer's Outlines, p. 205.) It is rightly observed by Ainsworth and Hengstenberg, 108 THE SONG OF SONGS. [i. 10. that in the word D^IH, used in this and the following verse, and signifying literally strings or rows of beads or the like, there is an allusive reference to the word min " law," with which it is etymologically con- nected. The same thing was evident to the Targumist. It was the Law, the Commandments of her God, that formed the distinguishing glory of the Church of Israel: cf. Deut. iv. 5 — 8. It is that Law with all its varied provisions that is here represented under the two images of a circlet and a necklace. Like a row of many beads, in that all its ordinances fitted on the one to the other; like a chain of many links, in that all its precepts con- tributed to its restraining force, it was at once an orna- ment and a bond. And it must be remembered that at the date of the composition of this Song, the Law itself remained, in all its integrity, the precious heirloom of the Church of Israel ; and however much its various provisions might be slighted or set at nought by the members of the nation, the Church in her deepest needs had still the treasure in her possession, a criterion by which she might recognize the truth, and a fountain whence she might draw her rills of instruction. Various passages in the Proverbs have been adduced in illustra- tion of the imagery under which the Law is here represented. So Prov. I. 8, 9; "My son, hear the instruction of thy father, and forget not the law of thy mother : for they shall be an ornament of grace unto thy head, and chains about thy neck." Similarly III. 3, 22; iv. 9 ; VI. 21. Compare the ordinance in Deut. VI. 8. And all these prepared the way for the I. 10.] THE ANTICIPATION. 109 more elaborate passage Ezek. xvi. 11, 12, in which is described God's early mercy to Israel in adorning her with the precepts of the Law. A circlet of gold will we make thee with studs of silver. The glories which the Church had displayed in the days of the old dispensa- tion were to be exchanged for higher glories under the new. So in Isaiah lx. 17, "For brass I will bring gold, and for iron I will bring silver." The hand- writing of ordinances, written and engraven in stones, was to give place to the perfect law of liberty, written by the Spirit on the fleshy tables of the heart. The Targumist explains this verse, equally with the preced- ing, of the Law given by Moses at Sinai : he knew not that in his day the glory of that law had already be- come dim by the side of "the glory that excelleth," 2 Cor. in. 10. All through the sacred period of their history, as this Song shews, the Israelitish people had viewed the glories put upon them as but the preludes and earnests of something better : it was not till they had finally rejected their promised Messiah, the Lord of glory, that they came to view the Mosaic dispensation as perfect in itself, and so to invest it with praises which it had never really claimed. Vv. 12 — 14. The central verses of the first portion of the Song. The Church, cheered by spiritual com- munion with her promised Lord, testifies how all- precious he is to her. While that the Icing at his table sitteth. The table is the symbol of the communion betwixt Christ and his people; and this symbolism, easy of comprehension from the first, has been now 110 THE SONG OF SONGS. [i. 12. permanently and definitively fixed by Christ himself in the ordinance of the Lord's supper. It was seated with his disciples at the table that he enjoyed his last solemn intercourse with them before his death ; and to partake at his table of the appointed tokens of his body and blood is for ever in the Christian Church the highest outward act of communion with him. It is implied moreover that at his table Christ spiritually feeds his Church with his word and his graces. It was at the conclusion of his last supper with his apostles that the fullest promises were given of the presence of the Com- forter to abide with them for ever. Sendeth forth my nard its fragrance. By the nard of the Church are signified " the sweet-smelling fruits of repentance, faith, love, prayer, thanksgiving, &c. which the Church sheweth forth by the communion of Christ with her." Here too the symbolism of the Song of Songs was out- wardly acted, as is recorded in the Gospels, in the earthly life of the Lord Jesus, and is also permanently embodied in the worship of the Christian Church. It was while he sat at table that the feet of our Saviour were, on two separate occasions, anointed ; and it may be added that if the one anointing, that in Luke VII. 36 — 50, represented more especially the offering of re- pentance, the other, that in Joh. XII. 3 scqq. &c. repre- sented emphatically the offering of the pure communion of love. And it is in the celebration of the Lord's supper that the Church still most solemnly presents her sacrifice of praise and thanksgiving which she beseech es God of his fatherly goodness to accept. A bundle of I. 13.] THE ANTICIPATION. Ill myrrh, &c. As a bundle of myrrh, treasured up for its fragrance in the bosom (the Hebrew phrase " between the breasts" signifies no more than this), such is Christ to all that receive him, and to the Church generally. He dwells in their hearts by faith. It must be further noted that myrrh is the emblem of death ; and it was as a sacrifice to God that Christ gave himself for us for a sweet-smelling savour. Cassiodorus : " Fasciculus myrrh a3 dilectus meus mihi factus est, quia propter me mortuus et sepultus est... In cordis mei memoria aster- naliter habebitur, et nunquam tantorum ejus benefi- ciorum obliviscar." A cluster of henna. "Henna is an Egyptian shrub, not unlike to our privet, nursed by the Easterns with great diligence for the sake of its sweet- smelling flowers. These are of a pale yellow colour, and stand in spikes of the length of a span, but not very close, so that leaves appear between them : they smell somewhat like musk. The leaves of the plant are extensively used for staining the hair and the nails reel. The plant has to be warmly protected during the winter, as it cannot endure the frost ; and it is frequently watered with soapsuds or manured with lime in order to make it earlier sprout, which it would not naturally do before August." (RauwolfT, ap. Harmer's Outlines, p. 220.) The Hebrew word for this plant, 1£D, signi- fies also ransom, propitiation ; of which the henna accordingly becomes the emblem. Thus as the last verse had testified of the preciousness to the Church of Christ's death, so this testifies of the preciousness of the redemption wrought by his death. From the gardens of 112 THE SONG OF SONGS. [i. 14. *Engedi. Engedi, a spot of remarkable and luxuriant fertility on the generally barren western shore of the Dead Sea, was known for its palms and its balsam. The mention of it here seems to be mainly intended to express, in a lively manner, the richness of the henna to which the Bride compares her Beloved. Yv. 15 — 17. The Bride and her Beloved address each other. Behold thou art fair, my love. Christ speaks the first. It is almost needless to observe that it is the spiritual beauty of the Church that he here commends. In what this spiritual beauty consists, the succeeding words shew. Thine eyes are doves. So again, iv. 1. The dove is the emblem of meek inno- cence and peaceful love : the eye is the symbol of joy. The source therefore of the beauty of the Church is that it is in peaceful love to Christ that her joy consists. In simplicity of mind she looks to Christ alone for life and salvation : on him rest all her hopes and all her desires; and this direction of her whole soul to him constitutes her beauty. Behold thou art fair, my beloved, yea, lovely. The Church replies. She assigns the reason why all her thoughts are directed to him. Cf. Psalm XLV. 2; Isaiah xxxin. 17. Also verdant is our couch. The couch is the symbol of the union of the Bridegroom and the Bride. Its verdure or freshness denotes there- fore the freshness of delight with which the Bridegroom and the Bride are both continually attracted the one toward the other. Each never ceases to commend the other's fairness: in the eyes of the Church Christ is permanently and unfadingly lovely, and on him never L 1( ^.] THE ANTICIPATION. 113 palls the charm of her continual devotion to him. The beams of our house are cedars, our hoardings firs. It is a matter of controversy whether the B>Tn, for which nil!! is merely a dialectic variation, represents the fir or the cypress. We may, till the matter be decided, adhere for convenience' sake to the received rendering ; ^but there can be little doubt that the tree was one whose wood was held in some esteem. It grew upon Lebanon, and was reckoned one of the ornaments of that range (Isaiah xxxvn. 24; lx. 13); and, along with the cedar, was used in the construction of the temple (1 Kings v. 8, 10; vi. 15, 34). In this last circumstance must be sought the key to the interpreta- tion of the passage before us. The temple was the standing outward embodiment of the presence of God with his people. The permanence of the union of Christ with his Church might accordingly be sym- bolized by the imagery of a building bearing a certain relation to the temple, and constructed of similar ma- terials. In order however to testify not only to the established permanence but also to the continual living freshness of the union, the poet describes the building as framed not merely of the wood of the trees which Lebanon supplied, but of the trees themselves; and this the more appropriately, since, as Hengstenberg remarks, both the trees were evergreens. II. 1—7. The glow of the preceding verses does not altogether fade from what succeeds; nor does the dia- logue between the Bridegroom and the Bride altogether cease. Yet on the whole the verses on which we now 8 114 THE SONG OF SONGS. [ll. 1. enter, instead of delineating the actual bliss of commu- nion between the Church and her Lord, describe rather the feelings with which the former surveyed it. I am the daisy of the meadoio, the lily of the valleys. The Church modestly disclaims for herself all pretensions to native dignity or splendour: the humblest flowers, set in their own lowly places, are the meetest emblems of her. The first-named of the two flowers, rP¥^Pl , has been occasionally, and perhaps rightly, identified with the autumn crocus, or meadow-saffron . The word \)1W , meadow, has been frequently treated as a proper name, Sharon; and if this be allowed, it is not without reason that Hengstenberg takes D^pDJJ, valleys, as a proper name also, explaining it of the valley of the Jordan. But the word is not elsewhere, in the plural, applied to that valley; and the better course therefore seems to be to take both terms in the verse as common nouns. As the lily among the thorns, &c. Christ replies. He ac- cepts the comparison which the Church had drawn of herself: it is just in her resemblance to the lily that her true beauty is discerned ; the beauty of modesty, purity, and grace. And this all the more when she is con- trasted with those in the midst of whom, like the lily among the thorns, she is often set. Thorns are the emblems of the wicked: David in his last words says, " The sons of Belial shall be all of them as thorns thrust away" (2 Sam. xxiii. G: the Hebrew word for thorns is not the same as that in the passage before us, but it need not essentially differ from it in meaning). The charac- ter here ascribed to the Church was well exemplified in II. 2.] THE ANTICIPATION. 115 that privileged member of the Church, the virgin-mo- ther of our Lord; the handmaiden whose low estate God did not pass unregarded, when, putting down the mighty from their seat, he exalted the humble and meek. As the citron-tree among the trees of the wood, &c. The Church, commended by Christ, shews forth in re- turn his praise. It is now generally agreed that the rilSH is the citron rather than the apple. The former corresponds to all that may be gathered of the tree from the notices of it in Scripture. The citron-tree is shady and beautiful : its fruit golden-coloured, and fragrant. By the trees of the wood are denoted the wild trees, emblems of men in their natural state, with whom Christ is here contrasted. In drawing out the primary con- trast, it is evidently right that we should remember it to be the contrast between Christ such as he is in himself, and men such as they are in themselves : the graces which they have received from his fulness, and whereby they have been partially transformed into his image, not entering in the first instance' into consideration. In his shade I sat down with delight. Even before the coming of Christ into the world, when he was as yet known only by promise, the Church was able to take refuge in that spiritual presence of him which was re- vealed to her by promise. Those who looked forward to the time when "a man" should be "as an hiding- place from the wind, and a covert from the tempest ; as rivers of waters in a dry place, as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land," must themselves have been com- forted by the anticipation of the comfort which they fore- 8—2 116 THE SONG OF SONGS. [iL 3. told. His fruit was sweet to my taste. The fruit repre- sents that food which is the sustenance of each indi- vidual soul, and wherefrom also the entire Church de- rives her appropriate nourishment. Of the trees which appear in the vision of Ezekiel it is said, xlvii. 12, " The fruit thereof shall be for meat, and the leaf thereof, for medicine." The words before us declare that the meat supplied to us by Christ is not only nutritious, when received, but also delicious, while the act of re- ceiving it is being performed. He brourjKt me into the banqueting house. So in Prov. ix. 1 — 5, Wisdom, having built her house, is represented as inviting the simple to turn in, and to eat of her bread and drink of the wine which she has mingled. Isaiah lv. 1 may be also compared. " The characteristic of wine," remarks Hengstcnberg, " in its relation to man is the cheerful- ness of disposition which it produces. Cf. Psalm CIV. 15; Prov. xxxi. 6, 7; xv. 15. The banqueting house (literally, house of wine) is accordingly, as observed by J. H. Michaelis, the symbol of all the benefits which conduce to the salvation and the comfort of the sinner, and the sentiment intended may be expressed in the declaration that the gospel furnishes the richest motive to comfort and joy. We have, in the passage before us, the motto to the gospel-narrative of the marriage in Cana, Joh. it. 1 — 11; of which, as also in the present case, the fundamental thought is, 'Christ, the Joy and the Comfort of the Church during her pilgrimage through the vale of misery.' The image of the verse before us is there acted out. The scene there displayed II. 4.] THE ANTICIPATION. 117 stands in precisely the same relation to our present pas- sage as the entrance of Christ into Jerusalem to Zech. IX. 9. Nor is it accidental that it should have been just at a wedding that that symbolical representation took place: the inferior wedding is, in the symbolical action, an image of that higher wedding in which Christ is the bridegroom." And love was his banner over me. Or perhaps, And love teas a banner over me 1 . A banner represents by some device, directly or indirectly, the cause to which we have professed our determination to adhere; and being presented before our eyes it strength- ens in a lively manner our resolution to abide by that to which we are bound. And what can more effectually seal our previous vows, and unite us more closely and permanently to him who is the very Fountain of love, than an abiding sense of the love which he has shewn, and a corresponding feeling of love in return? Strengthen me ivith grape-cakes, strew me with citron-leaves, for I am sick with love! The general thought is that the Church had long been ardently 'desiring her Lord's very presence. She had sought him, she had spiritually con- versed with him ; but face to face she had not yet beheld him. And thus her longing was at present unsatisfied; 1 The received reading vJTl, "and his banner," is substantially confirmed by the versions of the LXX, the Syriac translator, and Sym- inachus, though they pointed and rendered the word as a verb. But Aquila and Jerome (tra^ey, ordinavit) seem to have read simply 7H), or 7iT ; and this, pointed and treated as a substantive, commends itself in preference. The Targum (Latin Version, et vexillum preeceptorum ejus) might have been framed on either reading. 118 THE SONG OF SONGS. [il. 5. and she was consequently sick with love 1 . In this her languor she craves some immediate refreshment. If she may not jet obtain the presence itself, she asks that she may at least be indulged with glimpses of it. If she may not yet drink of wine, the juice of the grape in all its richness, she may at least be strengthened with cakes made of grapes dried and pressed together : if she may not yet eat of the rich golden fruit of the citron- tree, she may at least have citron-leaves strewn under her as she lies down to repose. Doubtless there were seasons before the coming of Christ at which this craving of the Church was especially indulged. We meet with a great his- torical period of religious refreshment, about a century after the date of this Song, in the reign of Hezekiah of Judah, when many of the Israelites of the ten tribes were brought back to the appointed seat of worship at Jerusalem, and when, through the occasion furnished for them by the piety of the reigning monarch, the antici- pations and predictions of the coming of Christ attained strength and clearness in a more than ordinary degree. The eighty-fourth and following psalms, and the thirty- second chapter of the prophecy of Isaiah, present us with reminiscences of this period of refreshment. His left hand shall be under my head, and his right hand shall embrace me. In other Avords, The time shall come when that sickness of love of which I now complain 1 The right meaning was perceived by Augustine, although the translation used by him scarcely represented the original. " Vulne- ratam se dixit charitate: amabat enim quiddam, et nondum tenebat; dolebat, quia nondum habebat " (In P.salmum xxxvn). II. 6.] THE ANTICIPATION. 119 shall be ministered to, and solaced, and satisfied by the presence of him on whom my affections are set. For that in these words the Church describes the full enjoy- ment of the presence of her Beloved is evident from the manner in which they are again introduced, before the refrain, in Tin. 3. In the following refrain itself the Church, enwrapped in visions of love, charges the by- standers, the spectators of her transports of delight, that they break not in rudely upon that bliss which she is enjoying. / adjure you. It is the Bride who still speaks : as is shewn by the circumstance that the cor- responding charge in v. 8 unquestionably proceeds from her. By the gazelles, or the hinds of the fells. In translating this verse an endeavour has been made to preserve some approach to the structure of the original, where the word D7BTV > as originally pronounced, i. e. dS&^IT, would approximately rhyme to D5HX. The reason why the gazelles and hinds are here introduced is their peaceful tenderness. The very existence of natural tenderness among animals should be a me- mento to the children of men to display, by moral restraint upon themselves, a tenderness no less pure and lovely. daughters of Jerusalem. See above on 1. 5. Although it is the Daughters of Jerusalem that are here addressed, the gender both of the pro- noun "you" and of the verb "that ye upstir not" is, in the original Hebrew, masculine. The reason of this is probably to be sought in the general indefinite- ness of the character which the Daughters of Jem- 120 THE SONG OF SONGS. [il. 7. salem, as members of the chorus, here sustain. The play of love. In the Hebrew this is expressed (exclud- ing the particle and article) by a single word, POn^, love; but as the thing intended is love in its activity, love as it flows peacefully forth towards its object, it seems necessary to render it in English by a paraphrase. Till it will it, i. e. till the soul which is now wholly absorbed in love desire it. Not that contemplation is altogether to supersede outward service, or that the " Master, it is good for us to be here," is to be indulged to the neglect of the labours wherein, during the season of this world, love to Christ is to display itself. But rude assaults by which the faith of the Church is tried, or distractions and schisms whereby her singleness of aim is enfeebled, she may lawfully deprecate; all, in short, which evilly upstirs or disturbs the love to Christ which she is seeking to cherish. THE AWAITING. ii. 8 — in. 5. Veni, veni, Emmanuel, Captivum solve Israel, Qui gemit in exilio Privatus Dei Filio. Gaude, gaude, Emmanuel Nascetur pro te, Israel. 8 Bride. The voice of my beloved! Lo he is come, Leaping over the mountains, bounding over the hills. 9 Like to a gazelle is my beloved, Or like to a young hart : Lo, he standeth behind our wall, He looketh through the window, He glanceth through the lattice ; 10 And he taketh and speak eth, even he, my beloved, to me : ' Rise now, my loved one, my fair one, and come thou ! 11 For lo, the winter is past, The rain is over and gone : 12 The flowers appear on the ground, The pruning-time is come, The voice of the turtle-dove is- heard in our land : 13 The fig-tree matures her green figs, The vines are in blossom, they yield forth a fragrance : Rise now, my loved one, my fair one, and come thou ! 14 My dove in the clefts of the rock, in the hiding-place of the cliff, Let me see thy countenance, let me hear thy voice, For sweet is thy voice, and thy countenance comely.' 15 Take ye us the foxes, the little foxes, 124 THE SONG OF SONGS. The destroyers of the vineyards ; for our vineyards are in bloom. 16 My beloved is mine, and I am his, . His who feedeth his flock among the lilies. 17 Against the day breathe cool, and the shadows flee away, Turn, haste thee, my beloved, like a gazelle or a young hart Upon the mountains of Bether. in. 1 Upon my couch by night I sought him whom my soul loveth : I sought him, but I found him not. 2 I resolved to rise, and to go about the city, Through the thoroughfares and the streets, To seek him whom my soul loveth : I sought him, but I found him not. 3 The watchmen found me that go about the city : Have ye seen him whom my soul loveth? I asked. 4 Scarcely had I passed from them When I found him whom my soul loveth : I held him and would not let him go Till I had brought him into the house of my mother, into the chamber of her that conceived me. 5 I adjure you by the gazelles, or the hinds of the fells, daughters of Jerusalem, That ye upstir not and that ye disturb not The play of love till it will it. II. 8 ] THE AWAITING. 125 In the previous section of the Song the Church had exercised her faith by anticipating her Lord's coming. But that coining was not to be immediately. There must be a previous season, and that a long season, of deferred hopes ; of dark storms, of baneful attacks, and of anxious searchings. Through all these the Church must be prepared to persevere, and must learn patiently to await the advent which in imagination she had already realized as present. Hence this section may be fitly designated as the Awaiting. It consists of fifteen verses. The principal division in it is formed by the central verse, II. 15, which stands by itself, alone. Vv. 8 — 14. The storms which should precede the Bridegroom's coming are not directly described ; but his coming itself is represented as occurring at the close of a comparatively dreary period. The voice of my he- loved. Hengstenberg notices the allusion to this passage in Joh. in. 29. Leaping over' the mountains, hounding over the hills. The mountains and hills are apparently mentioned because in nature they would form the furthest visible separation between us and one whom we desired to behold, but who was far removed from us. Mountains are indeed in Scripture the general symbol for kingdoms. But there is no sufficient warrant for applying here any interpretation based upon this known symbolism, as the choice of the imagery may be adequately explained by its correspondence with the comparison of the Bridegroom to a gazelle or young hart, and with the description of natural scenery in the succeeding verses. To the former of these the leaping 126 THE SONG OF SONGS. [il. 8. and the bounding unmistakeably point. Furthermore this passage explains the image in Psalm cxxi. 1, "I will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence com- eth my help." Like to a gazelle is my beloved, or like to a young hart. The points of comparison are, first, the graceful tenderness ; and secondly, the ability to sur- mount any height, however steep. Hab. ill. 19 will here serve to guide us : " The Lord God is my strength, and he will make my feet like hinds' feet, and he will make me to walk upon mine high places." He standeth behind our wall. Notice again the "our," used by the Church in speaking of herself. The general idea is that the Church has been imprisoned within her wall by the wintry storms, cf. Lam. in. 7, 9 : her Lord now graciously appears to summon her forth to the joys of the spring. The window and the lattice are conse- quently those of the wall within which the Church had been immured. lie glanceth. The sense conveyed by the verb in the original Hebrew is that the Bride beholds the beaming joy depicted on his countenance. He taketh and speaketh, lit. He answereth and saith, reminding us of the phrase so constantly employed by the evangelists in introducing the words of the Lord Jesus in the Gospels: e.g. Matth. xi. 25, Joh. v. 19. By answering they intended not merely the replying to words previously uttered, but also, more generally, the seizing occasion of discourse from anything that was or had been passing. The winter is past, the rain is tm r and gone. "Temporalis tribulatio finem accepit" (Justus Org.) "The winter and the rain are here," II. 11.] THE AWAITING. 127 observes Hengstenberg, " an image of calamities and judgments. In Psalm cxlvii. 16, 17, the psalmist beholds in snow, hoar-frost, and ice a type of the season of suffering which had lasted up to that date ; in the spring, ver. 18, a type of salvation which was just re- turning. We have there the explanation of the sym- bolical representation in the passage before us. And as winter here denotes a certain state of external circum- stances, so in Joh. x. 22 it appears as an emblem of a certain moral state. The 'it was winter,'' like other analogous expressions in that Gospel, implies more than at first sight appears. Every one knew that the feast of the dedication fell in the winter season. But as there was winter without, so too was there winter in the heart, in spite of the festal celebration ; and thus the words prepare the way for the wintry scene which follows. Rain, which is in Palestine more closely bound up with the winter than in our countries, appears as an image of calamity in Isaiah iv. 6; also in Matth. vii. 24, 25. One cannot stand out of doors in the rain, Ezra x. 13." The flowers appear on the ground. One of the various tokens of the spring ; which would suffi- ciently warrant the poetical mention of it here. It is probable however that the flowers themselves were intended to indicate the spiritual graces which should accompany, and even in occasional instances herald in, the advent of the gospel. Such were the fruits of re- pentance which John the Baptist invited : such also were the faith of the shepherds of Bethlehem, and the earnestness of Peter, and the guilelessness of Nathanael. 128 THE SONG OF SONGS. [n. 12. The pruning-time. The Hebrew word occurs but in this passage ; and many render, with our E. V., the time of the singing (of birds). But the root of the word, though applied both to pruning and to singing, is never used of the singing of birds ; and in the imagery before us any other singing than that of birds would hardly be in place. The key to the true meaning of the imagery is to be found in Joh. XV. 2 : " Every branch that beareth fruit, he purgeth it, that it may bring forth more fruit." At the introduction of the gospel all that there was good and honest and true among the children of men was to be nursed and quickened and stimulated into new and higher life. The voice of the turtle-dove. The turtle-dove appears in Psalm lxxiv. 19 as an image of the meek, or of the comrresration of God in its defenceless meekness. And in the gospel history we recognize the voice of the turtle-dove in the hymns of Mary, of Zacharias, and of Simeon ; hymns in which, from meek and chastened souls, the lyrical psalmody of Israel seemed after the lapse of many hundred years to be poured forth anew in order specially to herald in the new era of evangelic blessedness. The jig-tree matures her green figs, the rines are in hlossom, they yield forth a fragrance. Two more images of the preparatory signs of the evangelic fruits of righteousness which were speedily to follow; and the imagery here drawn from trees with which, of all fruit-bearing trees, the Jews were most familiar. To sit under one's own vine and under one's own fig-tree, was with them a proverbial expression to denote the II. 13.] THE AWAITING. 129 enjoyment of peace, prosperity, and abundance (1 Kings IV. 25 ; Micah iv. 4 ; Zech. III. 10) ; and, indepen- dently of this, we find in other passages the vine and fig-tree associated together, as trees from which through- out the land the people expected their annual produce of fruit (Hos. ix. 10; Micah VII. 1, in which latter pas- sage, equally as in the former, the first-ripe is the first-ripe of the fig-tree). It will be noticed that the passage before us does not speak of the ripe figs of the fig-tree, nor yet of the grapes of the vine : those were not to be expected till the influence of the gospel itself had been felt ; and it was as yet but spring-time : the summer was nigh at hand, but was not yet arrived. The green figs and the vine-blossom were the proper indications of it. It was for the green figs that our Saviour sought on the fig-tree on the way from Bethany to Jerusalem, and sought in vain. That tree was a type of the Jewish nation, which as a whole had failed to shew forth in due season the desired effects of God's past nurture ; and which thus br6ught down the doom of desolation on its head. But though the nation had proved barren as a whole, there was yet a remnant of grace that realized the anticipations of the verse before us, and became the nucleus of the Christian Church. My dove in the clefts of the rock, <$ac. Hengstenberg translates "in the refuges of the rock," understanding the rocks themselves to form the refuge, and arguing that this is the only admissible interpretation in the parallel passages Obad. 3, Jer. xlix. 16, where the same Hebrew phrase is found. Whichever rendering 9 130 THE SONG OF SONGS. [il. 14. we adopt, the general purport of the passage is substan- tially the same. The rock is but another image for that which was in ver. 9 expressed by the wall. It is a place of protection, but withal a place of confinement. And in the days of Israel the Church of God was all along confined as well as protected; confined by the heathen antagonism of the nations that hemmed in the little people of Israel around, though protected by the watchful power of the Lord against their violence and their malice. Let me see thy countenance, let me hear thy voice. Christ at his appearance upon earth sum- moned the Church forth from this her previous retreat. She was thenceforward to walk abroad into the world around. Knowledge of the truth, and with it disciple- ship, was to spread through all nations. The Church, with her acknowledgement of membership and with her outward organization, was to display herself to view in every region of the inhabited world; and from all nations were the strains of Christian worship to ascend up on high. And then should he who, as Saviour of the Church, was to see of the travail of his soul and be satisfied, gaze, as Lord of the Church, on the comeliness of her countenance and listen to the sweetness of her voice. Ver. 15. Take ye ns the foxes. Who speaks in this verse? Probably the Church, in her corporate capacity; yet so as that these words are not dramatically con- nected either with those which precede or with those which follow; and this the use of the plural pronoun of the first person helps to indicate. It will be noticed II. 15,] THE AWAITING. 131 moreover that the "ye" and the "us" are alike plural. The drama is in fact interrupted for the moment "by this, the central verse of the second portion of the Song; which describes by means of a general command, ex- pressed with as little defmiteness as possible, the work which the various members of God's people, the various labourers in the vineyard, must be continually pursuing during the period that shall elapse ere the Lord of the Church arrive. Foxes are common animals in Pales- tine. They are described as very numerous in the stony country about Bethlehem ; as abounding also near the convent of St John, in the desert, about vintage- time; and as destroying all the vines unless strictly watched (Hasselquist, ap. Harmer's Outlines, p. 256). They thus form an appropriate general designation for those who from within rather than without waste the heritage of God: who by the evil influence of their authority and example lead the people into sin, and so prevent those fruits of righteousness from appearing for which the blossoming of the vines had given encourage- ment to hope 1 . Evil kings, unworthy priests, lying prophets, all belong to this class ; Jeroboams, Ahabs, and Manassehs, Hophnis, Amaziahs, and Urijahs, Zede- kiah-ben-Chenaanahs, and Hananiahs. And as regards the circumstance that the warning against all such mis- leaders of the people should form the central flower of a poetic garland that is mainly occupied with the expecta- 1 In the Apostolical Constitutions, VI. 1 3, heretics are compared to foxes who crouch on the ground, the ruin of the vineyards: through them, it is said, the love of many waxes cold. 9—2 132 THE SONG OF SONGS. [il. 15. tion of the coming of Christ, we have to mark how ana- logously in the Prophets it is the very contemplation of present kingly, priestly, or prophetical ungodliness that leads to the delineation of Christ as the future worthy ruler and shepherd. Cf. Isaiah xxxii; Jeremiah xxill; Ezekiel xxxiv. Nor is the comparison of the internal wasters of God's heritage to prowling foxes peculiar to the Song of Songs. It is found also in Ezek. XIII. 4: " O Israel, thy prophets are like the foxes in the de- serts." It was moreover with allusion, as Hengstenberg has acutely pointed out, to the passage before us, that our Lord, when warned by certain of the Pharisees to depart, because Herod would kill him, replied, " Go ye, and tell that fox, &c." (Luke xiii. 32). "It is main- tained by Bengel that Herod is here called a fox on account of his craftiness and his hypocritical timidity. There is however here no trace of any craftiness; nor does aught beside lead us to the conclusion that craft was a feature in Herod's character. Nor is there any other passage of Scripture in which the fox appears as the symbol of craft. The appellation can only rest upon the fact directly related of Herod, that he wished to kill Jesus; and the true connexion is only brought out when we refer back to the passage in the Song of Songs : our Lord's meaning being, Go ye and tell that destroyer of God's vineyard." Vv. 16, 17. In these and the ensuing verses is more definitely delineated the anxiety with which, ere her Lord arrive, the Church awaits his presence. She first virtually declares, in the full confidence of faith, II. 16.] THE AWAITING. 133 her conviction that he will eventually come to receive her; she then prays for his coming; and thirdly, shews how her anxiety must continue till she actually welcome his presence. My beloved is mine. And therefore it cannot be that he will absent himself from the Church for ever. And I am his. And therefore if the Church thus feel that it is to him that she belongs, she must never be so undutiful, however long his approach be delayed, as to lay her thoughts of him aside. She must expect him till he come: she must live for him, and in hope of him. How deeply the most pious of her mem- bers connected each crisis through which they had to pass with their expectations of the coming of the Mes- siah may be illustrated by the example of the prophet Daniel. Who feedeth his flock among the lilies. Lilies are the emblems of holy purity. Even before his com- ing, Christ was, through the prophets, and through the ceremonial training of the Law, nursing his people in holiness. Still more has he so nursed them since his coming, cf. VI. 3. Against the ddy breathe cool, and the shadows flee away. That is, before the evening set finally in. The approach of the natural evening is known by its signs; viz. first, the gentle breeze spring- ing up before sunset; and secondly, the gradual elon- gation of the shadows and consequent retreat of their outline, cf. Psalm Cii. 11. But that natural evening here represents the evening of the season of grace of God's ancient people. It was just as the transgressions of the Jewish nation, as a nation, had nearly reached their full, that Christ appeared, bringing salvation to them that 134 THE SONG OF SONGS. [il. 17. had waited for him. And long before his coming, the faithful, beholding the multiplied provocations where- with Israel was vexing God, might well pray that the advent of the Messiah might not be delayed till the day of probation should have finally passed away, and the tidings of redemption should be too late. Hengsten- berg remarks that in the words of the disciples at Emmaus, Luke xxiv. 29, "Abide with us: for it is toward evening, and the day is far spent," there was an allusion, through a probably unconscious reminiscence, to our present passage. " The reference to it," he adds, " was deeper than they could have intended : they themselves were a type of their nation, whose sun was on the point of setting." And we may further observe that the symbolism involved in their words has probably been recognized and felt by many who have been com- paratively unacquainted with the passage whence it was originally drawn : the more especially since it has been transferred to other Christian writings, such as the German hymn, "Ach bleib bei uns Herr Jesu Christ," or the evening-hymn in the " Christian Year." The New Testament has brought out to many the significance of the Old : Christian poetry has further unfolded to many the significance of the New. Turn. That is, turn thee hither, come to me. Others take the word in the oppo- site sense, of departing. But the former accords better with the context. Like a gazelle or young hart. See on ver. 9. Upon the mountains of Bether. Bether (from the root ^IFQ "to divide") denotes separation: the mountains were those which separated the Church from II. 17.] THE AWAITING. 135 her Beloved, see above, on ver. 8. It may be that the Bitliron, mentioned in 2 Sam. II. 29 as lying to the east of the Jordan, was the name of a mountain-district, and that it was the hills of this district that the poet had in view, and thus worked up into his imagery. III. 1 — 5. Upon my couch by night. The night here mentioned has no connexion with the close of day of the imagery of the preceding verse. In fact what was day there is night here ; for that which was in one respect to the Church a season of grace, through which she was being divinely nursed with the hope of ultimate redemption, was yet in another respect a season of dark- ness, because troubles floated thick around, and her Lord was still absent from her. There is a natural harmony between night-time and sorrow, which causes the mention of the one to be often introduced in Scrip- ture in connexion with the delineation of the other : e. g. Psalm lxxvii. 2 (for a list of other passages, see Hengstenberg). For the like reason, since "weeping may endure for a night, but joy oometh in the morning," the morning-time is in Scripture the natural emblem of gladness, and as coming from God, of salvation. The couch, again, naturally associates itself with the dark- ness of night. I sought him. In three different ways. First, by simple longing, on her couch: nor can we wonder that in the depth of her afflictions the Church should long more earnestly for her appointed deliverer. Secondly, in the streets of the city, through which, during the darkness, she should hardly have sponta- neously roamed : we have here indications of the impa- 136 THE SONG OF SONGS. [ill. 1. tience which led Israel, when " howling upon their beds," to "call to Egypt," and "go to Assyria," and to picture to themselves phantom deliverers, forgetting that he who made darkness created also the light, and that "his going forth" was "prepared as the morning" (Hos. VI, vn). Still, in the Song, it is primarily after her own true Lord, albeit with some impatient rashness, that the Church is represented as searching. Thirdly, she seeks by enquiring of the watchmen who found her in her rambles. In these watchmen we may recognize the various Hebrew prophets raised up of God. It was the prophets, from Hosea onward, that faithfully re- buked the impatience to which the Church was too apt to give way, and that yet at the same time upheld and quickened her hopes of the eventual coming of her Messiah. Most truly may it be said that they " found" the Church roaming; for they began to be raised up just at the time when Israelitish impatience was most strongly unfolding itself, and they were, in fact, the con- temporary witnesses of all the vain endeavours which the Israelites made to obtain deliverance from their troubles by alliance with the empires of the world. Of these then, as they successively found her, the Church enquires — "Watchman, what of the night? Watchman, what of the night ?" Nor were her enquiries fruitless, when a Daniel was commissioned to declare even the time of the Messiah's coming. Scarcely had I passed from them. Nearly nine centuries elapsed from the period when this Song was written, four centuries from the period when the last Old Testament prophet III. 4.] THE AWAITING. 137 spoke, to the time when Christ actually appeared. But prophecy does not in general measure the distance in time between future events. It views them as linked together by sequence of connexion rather than of time. The speediness with which Christ's advent is here re- presented as following on the enquiries made by the Church of the watchmen finds its parallel in those anti- cipations of the speediness of Christ's second advent with which the New Testament abounds, e. g. Phil. iv. 5, James V. 8, Rev. I. 1. I found him. The season of expectation is at an end : Christ has come unto his own. / held him, &c. The phrase expresses the deep ardour with which they that had long waited for him welcomed him. There was a literal verification of the words when the aged Simeon took up the infant Saviour in his arms. Till I had brought him into the house of my mother, into the chamber of her that conceived me. No stress must be laid on the "I had brought him," except so far as the Church had prevailed thereto by her prayers: rather we may say that the bringing him is, poetically represented as the act of the Church, in order thereby to express the welcome with which she received him. We are said to bring a person into our house when we go out to meet him as he enters, though it may be that he enters spontaneously, and even by his own right : in like man- ner we are said to bring him on his way when we escort him forth, even though we may not be rendering him any actual assistance. The mother of the Bride is here, as elsewhere in the Song (see on I. 6), the Israelitish nation; and by Christ's being brought into her house is 138 THE SONG OF SONGS. [ill. 4. denoted his being born into .the world of the stock of Israel. It was of Israel that " as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever;" and thereby were all the promises to Israel fulfilled, and the glory of Israel consummated. The Church beheld therein a crowning proof of God's faithfulness, and re- joiced that her Lord should spring of the privileged race to which all her own members had up to that time belonged. I adjure you, &c. See on II. 7. Again brought to the point where through faith she beholds her Beloved as actually arrived in answer to her long- ings, the Church again charges the bystanders that her enjoyment of the blissful prospect may not be rudely disturbed. THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS RESULTS. in. 6— v. 1. Vexilla Regis prodeunt, Fulget crucis lnysterium, Quo carne carnis Coaditor Suspenaus est patibulo. Venaxtius. 6 Chorus. Who is this that cometh up from the wil- derness . Like to columns of smoke, Perfumed with myrrh and frankincense, With every fragrant powder of the merchant? 7 Lo! it is the bed of Solomon: Around it are threescore valiant men Of the valiants of Israel ; 8 All practised swordsmen, men expert in war, Each with his sword upon his thigh Ready against nightly alarm. 9 A palanquin hath King Solomon made for himself Of the wood of Lebanon : 10 Its pillars hath he made of silver, its back of gold, Its seat of purple, Its middle tesselated with love because of the daugh- ters of Jerusalem. 11 Come forth, ye daughters of Zion, and gaze on King Solomon, And on the crown wherewith his mother hath crowned him, In the day of his espousal, and in the day of his gladness of heart. 7. 1 Beloved. Behold, thou art fair, my love, Behold, thou art fair, thine eyes are doves 142 THE SONG OF SONGS. Behind thy plaits: Thy hair is like a flock of goats Hanging down the slope of Mount Gilead : 2 Thy teeth are like a flock of shearing-sheep Coming up from the wash-pool, All appearing in pairs, And not a lone one amongst them: 3 Like a crimson brede are thy lips, And lovely to behold is thine utterance: Like a slice of pomegranate are thy temples Behind thy plaits: 4 Thy neck is like the tower of David Built with projecting parapets, Whereon are hung the thousand shields, The whole of the targes of the valiants : 5 Thy two breasts are like two young twins, Fawns of a gazelle, that feed among the lilies. 6 Against the day breathe cool, and the shadows flee away, I will get me to the mountain of myrrh and to the hill of frankincense. 7 Thou art all of thee fair, my love, And there is not a blemish in thee. 8 From Lebanon, spouse, with me, From Lebanon with me shalt thou come, THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS RESULTS. 143 Shalt gaze from the summit of Amana, From the summit of Shenir and Hermon, From the dens of lions, from the mountains of panthers. 9 Thou hast ravished my heart, my sister, my spouse, Thou hast ravished my heart with one bend of thine eyes, With one chainlet of thy necklace. 10 How fair is thy love, my sister, my spouse, How goodlier is thy love than wine, And the scent of thy ointments than all spices! 11 Thy lips drop honeycomb-drops, my spouse; Honey and milk are under thy tongue; And the fragrance of thy attire is as the fragrance of Lebanon. 12 A garden enclosed is my sister, my spouse, A garden enclosed, a fountain sealed: 13 Thy shoots a paradise of pomegranates, With precious fruits, Henna and spikenard; 14 Spikenard and saffron, calamus and cinnamon, With all trees of frankincense, Myrrh and aloes, With all choicest aromatics; 15 A bubbling fountain, A well of living waters, And streams from Lebanon. 144 THE SONG OF SONGS. 16 Bride. Awake, north wind! and approach, thou south ! Blow on my garden that its perfumes may flow out ! Let my beloved come into his garden And eat his precious fruits ! v. 1 Beloved. I am come into my garden, my sister, my spouse; I gather my myrrh with my spices; I eat my honeycomb with my honey; I drink my wine with my milk: Eat, friends! Drink and enjoy ye, beloved! The third section of the Song, in which all the in- terest of its earlier portion culminates, consists, like the first section, of twenty-three verses. Of these the first six, ill. 6 — 11, evidently run together, and form the description of the Espousal. Correspondingly the last six, IV. 12 — V. 1, have a close mutual connexion: they describe the Bridegroom's garden, and his entry into it to gather its precious fruits. The intermediate verses are mainly occupied with setting forth the graces of the Bride; and their appropriateness to the place in which they stand will appear as we examine the whole section in order. But among them one verse, IV. 6, remarkably interrupts the flow of the rest; and the very isolation in which it apparently stands renders its meaning in the first instance obscure. It is the central verse of the whole section, as a computation of the verses will readily III. 6.] THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS RESULTS. 145 shew. It comprises in itself, as we shall find, the essence of the whole ; and to this we have an outward testimony in the circumstance that the myrrh and the frankincense of which it speaks appear at once in the opening verse of the section, hi. 6, and again, substan- tially, in the concluding verse, v. 1, "my myrrh with my spices." If therefore we were to follow the phrase- ology of the Song itself, "Myrrh and Frankincense" would form the most proper designation of the present section: it may however be otherwise described, less enigmatically, as " The Espousal and its Eesults." Vv. 6—11. Who is this that cometh up. The pro- noun is feminine, so that it is the Bride whose approach is here described. The Hebrew will bear also the trans- lation, " What is this that cometh, &c.;" which accord- ingly some interpreters have been led by the context to adopt. But against this is the analogy of the corre- sponding passage viii. 5, where the subject of the ques- tion is plainly the Bride herself. We can hardly tear asunder two passages which stand. in so manifest a mu- tual relation; and of which the one describes the satis- faction of all the Bride's earlier longings, the other her complete and final blessedness. No direct answer is given to the question here asked, nor indeed is any needed; the purport of it being simply to draw attention to the honour which she who so long had sought her Beloved was now at last receiving. In this and the following verses it is the Chorus of the Daughters of Jerusalem, and through them the poet, that speaks. From the wilderness. As symbolical of a state of pil- 10 146 THE SONtt OF SONGS. [ill. 6. grimage and toil which now at last was ended. The Church had arrived at the goal of her Old Testament journey, and the beauty of the Lord her God was now manifested upon her. Like to columns of smoke. The Hebrew word for "columns," fYDftTl, is of uncertain etymology, and is found elsewhere in the Bible only in Joel II. 30. The correctness however of the meaning usually assigned to it has been recently vindicated by Ilodiger in his completion of the Thesaurus of Gesenius. The LXX. rendered it cnekixVi intending thereby "stems" or "branches:" so also Jerome, " virgula." These come sufficiently near to the received translation. The general purport of the image is that the Bride was so richly provided with perfumes that they curled up in dense columns of smoke, visible at a distance as the procession moved along. The following words shew the nature of these perfumes. With myrrh. It had been mentioned once before in the Song; and that (observe hereby the importance attached to it) in the central verse of the first section, t. 13. Here, as there, it is the emblem of Christ's death; and to the death of Christ for her the Church owes all her honour : " Ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold,. ..but with the precious blood of Christ." In the myrrh offered to the infant Saviour by the wise men of the east the Church has ever recognized the unconscious token of his future passion ; and it was also one of the substances used for his burial. What was thus offered in devotion to him comes back from him to the Church as an emblem of the virtue that has gone forth from III. 6.] THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS RESULTS. 147 him for her purification. And frankincense. Frankin- cense is, throughout Scripture, the emblem of prayer, ascending upwards, like the fragrant wreaths of its smoke, towards the throne of God. The symbolism was necessarily recognized in the Mosaic ritual, where the regular use of a sacred incense, partly compounded of frankincense, was prescribed. It is also recognized in Ps. cxli. 2, Rev. v. 8, Till. 3, 4. Here, where frankincense is conjoined with myrrh, the one, so to speak, qualifies the other : the myrrh symbolizes Christ's death : the frankincense expresses the priestly character of that death ; the death itself constituting that act of devotion wherein he made offering to God. Thus then the Church is represented as perfumed with the sweet- smelling savour of that offering and sacrifice which her Lord made to God for her (Eph. v. 2). The older view of the import of the frankincense in this place, as given by Theodoret, and in part also by Philo of Carpasia, was that it represented prayer made to Christ, and so expressed the Church's acknowledgement of his divinity. But the perfume spread over the Church must, according to all analogy, proceed from some act of Christ's ; not merely from her acknowledgment of his perfections. With every fragrant 'powder of the merchant. That is, with every fragrant powder which can be procured : myrrh and frankincense themselves were both articles of commerce, and were brought to Palestine from Arabia. The words before us give expression to the truth that in whatever aspect, main or subsidiary, the death of Christ be viewed, it is still for the Church that it was endured, 10—2 148 THE SONG OF SONGS. [ill. 6. and it is she to whom accrue all benefits of his passion. In the composition of the holy anointing oil of the Mosaic ritual there were used, besides myrrh, cinnamon, calamus, and cassia: in that of the holy incense there were mixed with the frankincense stacte, onycha, and galbanum (Exod. xxx.). In Psalm xlv. 8 we have mention, along with the myrrh, of aloes and cassia (dif- ferent from the cassia of Exodus) ; and in the description of the garden, at which we shall in the Song presently arrive, we have aloes again associated with the myrrh, and calamus and cinnamon with the frankincense. Lo! it is the bed of Solomon, to wit, in which the Bride is being borne along. The succeeding verses shew that a travelling litter is here intended. But the fact of its being Solomon's shews also that it is as the bride of her Beloved that the Church is being here conveyed and escorted. This is the first passage in the Song (for we can scarcely take the like view of I. 5) in which the Beloved is designated as Solomon. Vv. 9, 11, in which he is again so designated, are obviously connected with this : after which the name does not occur again till at the close of the Song, vili. 11, 12. The first and most obvious respect in which the Beloved here appears as the antitype of Solomon is his royal splendour. There is however a second and no less important point of com- parison : both in this chapter and in Chapter VIII. the Beloved comes before us as the " Peaceful One," whose advent is to introduce a period of glorious repose to the Church after her long previous straggles. The question now arises, What is it precisely that is here symbolized III. 7.] THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS RESULTS. 149 by the bed of Solomon ? In the commentary of Philo of Carpasia the Church herself is supposed to be intended; and it is beautifully observed that she was the chosen resting-place of Him who, before he took her unto him- self, had not where to lay his head. So sudden a repre- sentation however under the figure of a bed of her who throughout the rest of the Song appears as the Bride would be violent and unnatural. It is no sufficient answer to this to say that in IV. 12 seqq. the Church is described under the figure of a garden. An additional metaphor is there avowedly introduced, and that with- out setting aside the ordinary allegory of the Song; for it is not the Church directly that is there compared to a garden, but rather the Bride by whom, throughout the Song, the Church is represented. No poet however could well institute a comparison between a bride and the bed wherein she was being conveyed. Besides which, there is no room to doubt that the "bed" of the present verse is substantially identical with the " palan- quin" of vv. 9, 10; and to interpret that palanquin of the Church is fairly impossible. The fact is that the bed of ver. 7 is mentioned mainly as an anticipation of the palanquin of vv. 9, 10; and we must wait for its full interpretation till we proceed to those verses. "We may however at once observe that the Bride is being con- veyed in her Lord's litter, and that thus is set forth her union with him. Around it are threescore valiant men, (Ssc. The image is taken from the corps of heroes who, having been the early companions of David in his wan- derings, formed eventually the nucleus and the elite of 150 THE SONG OF SONGS. [ill. 7. his army (2 Sam. xxiii.). A similar body may have shone around the court of Solomon. The number of David's heroes, " thirty and seven in all," was exactly thirty exclusive of those who stood superior to the rest in rank; and if the number threescore have any definite meaning in the present verse, it is probably to be taken as the double of the number of the heroes of David's reign. A comparison however of this verse with vi. 8 may furnish ground for regarding sixty as a determinate number used for an indeterminate. The general idea conveyed by the image is the all-efficient guard with which Christ watched over those whom he had come to ransom. It is the same idea which is expressed by the words of his own final prayer: "While I was with them in the world, I kept them in thy name : those that thou gavest me, I have kept" (Job. xvn. 12). The fact that Christ's was mainly a spiritual protection pre- cludes our thinking of any visible antitypes of Israel's older valiants. Beady against nightly alarm. Nightly alarm is sudden alarm which comes upon us in the hours of darkness. It was an outward testimony of Christ's readiness to defend his Church against such alarm, when, suddenly confronted with Judas and the band that had come to arrest him, he bade them, if they sought him, let his disciples go their way: " that the saying might," adds the evangelist, "be fulfilled, which he spake, Of them which thou gavest me have I lost none." The more general lesson is that Christ's grace is sufficient for us under every temptation. A palanquin hath King Solomon made for himself. In this and the III. 9.] THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS RESULTS. 151 following two verses there is no direct mention of the Bride. Her happiness has been already described : henceforth the bed or palanquin is viewed solely in its relation to the Bridegroom himself. To this the " for himself" of the present verse points. The word jIHStf, LXX. (popelov , Jer. "ferculum," i.e. a triumphal wagon or car, is best derived, with Gesenius, from the unused root !Tl3, "to be borne;" but there can in any case be no doubt, from the ensuing description, of the general character of the object intended. It is the ve- hicle on which the royal Bridegroom is being conveyed to the solemnities of his espousal, and to the fulness of his glory and his joy. If now it be asked by what out- ward means Christ united his Church unto himself, and entered into his glory, we must at once answer, By his career of suffering. " Through sufferings" he was made " perfect;" and the unshrinking endurance of each temp- tation and agony added a precious jewel to the crown of unperishing glory which now rests upon him. That which was once his shame is seen, in its true light, as his glory by us. And as all his sufferings culminated in his death upon the cross, so is that cross become to us the outward symbol of all his patient mortal pilgrimage : it was the outward instrument on which all was finally accomplished, and is accordingly invested in our eyes with the reflexion of the glory into which by it Christ entered. Hence the correspondence between the palan- quin of the Song and the cross of the Gospels : each' is, in its own proper sphere, the outward symbol of the same inward reality. The palanquin was, by Cyril, 152 THE SONG OF SONGS. [ill. 9. interpreted of the cross ; and it was probably not without some reminiscence of the description of the one that the passion-hymn of Venantius thus apostrophized the other : Arbor decora et fulgida, Ornata regis purpura, Electa digno stipite Tatn sancta membra tangere. Of the wood of Lebanon. As the palanquin is to be represented as of the utmost magnificence, the best of materials contribute to its construction. It is not necessary to suppose that any significance is intended in the assignment of separate materials to particular parts of the vehicle : the object is simply to embrace in the description all the richest. Its pillars. The pillars support the canopy of the palanquin. Its bach. LXX. dvcackirov, Jer. " reclinatorium, " the part against which the back of the rider leaned. Its middle tesse- lated with love. It is not quite clear what we are to understand by the middle ; whether the interior panel- ling of the vehicle, or its floor. Happily in respect of the symbolical meaning this is of little importance. That we must here allow a symbolical meaning is evident from the fact that it is "with love" that the vehicle is represented as tesselated ; and it was probably to make the symbolical meaning clearer that the phrase "its middle" was employed. The truth symbolized is this ; that Christ's manifold love to the Church was the great central secret of his death. " He loved the church, and gave himself for it." Because of the daughters of Jerusalem. It has been shewn above, III. 10.] THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS RESULTS. 153 on I. 5, that the Daughters of Jerusalem represent the members of the Church simply as spectators of the scenes that are passing, and irrespectively of their spiritual condition. The truth then here enigmatically set forth is the love of Christ to all, even to those who might be looking with comparative indifference upon him. The passage amounts to a direct denial of the doctrine that Christ died only for the elect. Of those who followed him to Calvary, and who stood round his cross, how many must there have been who entered not at all into the real depths and purport of his sufferings, but on whom meanwhile he was gazing with the tenderest love and pity, and for whom he was offering himself up an obedient sacrifice unto God ! Nor vainly offering himself; for it was to those very persons, who had looked upon his sufferings with com- parative ignorance and indifference, that the pentecostal discourse of Peter was addressed, stirring them up to a sense of what had been wrought on their behalf, and bidding them be themselves baptized "in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins." Come forth, ye daughters of Zion, and gaze, &c. Eemarkable here is the use of the phrase "daughters of Zion" in con- trast to the " daughters of Jerusalem " of the preceding verse. It occurs but thrice in Scripture beside, viz. in Isaiah in. 16, 17, IV. 4, which verses all form part of one connected passage; and in which the prophet is engaged either in delineating the sins of the members of the church, as aggravated by their privileges, or in shewing that from the consequent judgment a remnant 154 THE SONG OF SONGS. [ill. 11. shall be preserved holy unto the Lord. It is thus distinctly as members of the Church that, even elsewhere in Scripture, the Daughters of Zion are contemplated. The same is here the case. The invitation is not here to all, to go forth and gaze on the Divine King of Israel, merely as outward spectators of the course by which he enters into his glory ; but rather to those who have been taught to feel the deep connexion between his wondrous career and the salvation and glorification of the Church, to go forth and gaze on him in true devotion, and to admire and to adore his matchless love. And this invitation is renewed each time that the Church summons us, whether by lesson of Scrip- ture or by observance of holy day, or in any other manner whatsoever, to the contemplation of the passion of our Redeemer. And on the crown wherewith his mother hath crowned him. That is, Gaze on him as crowned. His mother, identical with the mother of the Bride (see on ill. 4), is, as has been shewn on I. 6, the Israelitish or Jewish nation ; and it was she who crucified him. This was in early times, so far as we can learn, the universal Christian interpretation. Philo of Carpasia says, tersely enough : " His mother crowned him, when the Synagogue of the Jews placed the crown of thorns upon his head. It is she who is here called the mother of his flesh, because it was of the Jews that, according to the flesh, he sprang." Replace "synagogue" by "nation," and this observation is excellent. Similarly Cyril. Theodoret writes : " He was crowned with love :... greater love hath no man III. 11.] THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS EESULTS. 155 than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. Now it was his mother that thus crowned him. By his mother is intended Judea, in reference to his human nature. It was she who, unwillingly, presented him with this crown. She, to do him dishonour, crowned him with the crown of thorns : he, through the thorns, received the crown of love, by voluntarily enduring the dishonour." If the early interpreters thus agreed in recognizing in the Jews the mother of the Bridegroom, it is evident that they also further agreed in connecting the Bridegroom's crown with the crown of thorns. The interpretation naturally commends itself to us; and it is hardly improved upon by Theodoret's additional observations respecting the crown of love, at least in the form in which he puts them, since that cannot strictly be said to have been presented to the Bride- groom by his mother. Let us see then how far the parallel between the nuptial crown of the Song and the crown of thorns of the Gospels holds good. It may be at once premised that, as in the* case of the palanquin and the cross, the one cannot be directly treated as a symbol of the other: each, in the light in which it here comes before us, is itself but a symbol, and must therefore not be mistaken for the object symbolized. The two may however correspond in being alike sym- bols of the same thing. And be it here observed that each coronation was essentially of the nature of an exhibition or display; a summing up, so to speak, in outward show, of what was otherwise passing ; not a means to an end, not a ceremony which in itself 156 THE SONG OF SONGS. [ill. 11. contributed to any result. The nuptial crown of the Song was the public token of the personal rejoicing of the Bridegroom on the arrival of that day of union to which he had long been looking forward : " Come forth, ...and gaze... on the crown... in the day of his, &c." The crown of thorns of the Gospels, imposed in mockery by the soldiers after they had observed the temper of the Jewish populace, was the public token of our Saviour's pretensions to royalty. " Then came Jesus forth, wearing the crown of thorns, and the purple robe. And Pilate saith unto them, Behold the man ! " Now wherein, by his own account, did our Saviour's royalty consist ? In bearing witness to the truth. It was for this that he had been born and had come into the world ; and this he had, that day, in the presence of Pilate, emphatically had the oppor- tunity of performing. Amid the sorrows that on that day surrounded him, and of which the thorns of his crown were no inappropriate emblems, he was accom- plishing that which had been the purpose of his whole earthly life ; the day had arrived wherein he should, by his sufferings, summon most touchingly and most effectually unto himself all that were of the truth and that heard his voice ; and it was the very intensity of the trial that was to bring out into full relief the moral grandeur of his triumph. Henceforth, by being lifted up, he should draw all men unto him ; and thus by his sufferings and death would both his union with the Church and his dearest joy be accomplished. Each crown thus witnessed, in its own peculiar way, to III. 11.] THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS RESULTS. 157 the heavenly Solomon's successful achievement of his cherished purpose. And as it is evidently on the exposure of his glory to the public gaze that the chief stress is here laid, so let it be remembered how essen- tially public was our Saviour's death, by reason of his being lifted up upon the cross for all men to be- hold. The more public the shame intended for him by his crucifiers, the more public the display of his real glory. No other form of death would have ren- dered him so completely a spectacle unto men as the death of the cross ; and therefore in no other form of death would his love to all mankind have been so openly and effectually manifested. In the day of Ms espousal. The death of Christ was the act of espousal : it was herein that he " loved the church, and gave himself for it," " that he might present it to himself." With his life was his troth to the Church irrevocably plighted : with his blood was his love to the Church irrevocably sealed. In no way could he give himself more determi- nately to the Church than in this : " greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." And so also correspondingly, for the marriage-bond must be mutual, in no way more effectu- ally than in this could he bind the Church unto himself. No force can be given to any human covenant or en- gagement more sacred than that which is imparted to it by the death of one of the contracting parties. There remains no power of alteration when he who alone could alter it, even if he had the will to alter it, has been once lastingly removed. And thankless and un- 158 THE SONG OF SONGS. [ill. 11. gracious as it might be to repel the voluntary devotion of a friend so long as there remained to him the power of withholding it, it would be a disregard of all that is sacred among men to dishonour our obligation to one who in our best and truest interests had once surren- dered, past recall, his all. It is because Christ and his Church are thus mutually bound by his passion, that our outward sacrament of communion with him still consists, by his appointment, in partaking of the tokens of his body and blood that were given and shed in death for us. And in the day of his gladness of heart. The extremity of grief was also the fulness of rejoicing. Beneath the sorrows that weighed upon him lay the joy with which the Kedeemer of the world welcomed the consummation of the purpose for which he had come into the world. " I have a baptism to be baptized with," he once had said; " and how am I straitened till it be accomplished!" And with this accord his words to his apostles at the last supper: " With desire I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer" (meaning, " with desire have I desired to enter upon this prelude of my approaching sufferings." The words " before I suffer " do not qualify the desire, but rather interpret the passover 1 ). It was with kindred 1 Aponius eloquently writes: "Diem ltetitice cordis Christi esse Spiritus sanctus edocuit diem qua lugubriter gaudebat Judieus, et IsetititB lacbrymas in morte Cliristi fundebant apostoli, lugebant et elements pendere in patibulo condemnatum: sed ketabatur qui pependit; quum mors pendentis omnibus credentibus vitam et gaudia adportavit. Cordis utique erat laetitiae dies Domini Christi quando meretrix lacbrymas fim- dendo, raptor qua-lruplo male direpta restituendo, puhlicanua rclictn III. 11.] THE ESPOUSAL AND ITS RESULTS. 159 feelings that an apostle of the Lord wrote respecting himself, " Yea, and if I be offered upon the sacrifice and service of your faith, I joy, and rejoice with you all. For the same cause also do ye joy, and rejoice with me." In fact the joy wherewith so many of the early Christian martyrs welcomed, sometimes even to excess, the day of their martyrdom, was, in its purest form, the genuine reflexion of the gladness wherewith their Master had previously humbled himself to his appointed death upon the cross. They rejoiced inasmuch as they became " partakers of Christ's sufferings." It is only one taken at random, out of innumerable testi- monies on this subject, when Ignatius is described as commencing his journey from Antioch with much readi- ness and joy, through desire of his suffering; /xera 7ro\A?~(pyt]TtK7] avrov duvapus. V. 4.] THE ABSENCE. 203 19, 20. The reading V7S , " for him," which some have on mere Jewish and manuscript authority replaced by *h$, "for me," is upheld by all the ancient versions. Up I arose. Literally, " I arose." So too at the begin- ning of the next verse the literal rendering is simply "I opened." But in both places the use, contrary to Hebrew custom, of the pronoun ^K, "I," is emphatic; and seems to indicate an alertness and forwardness which must in an English rendering be expressed in some other manner. Myrrh. The emblem, as elsewhere, of death : " that myrrh is the symbol of death," says Gregory of Nyssa, " no one versed in the sacred writings will doubt." It expresses here, first, the inward self- denial with which the Church, in striving after the holi- ness of her Lord, is continually mortifying the deeds ot the flesh ; and secondly, the " dying daily" of outward suffering, crowned in many instances by actual martyr- dom, which has been the continual lot of the Church while treading in her Lord's footsteps 1 . Liquid myrrh. By this is denoted the myrrh which exudes naturally from the myrrh-tree, and which is choicer in quality than that which is artificially extracted. It is apparently the same with that designated in Exod. xxx. 23 by a name which our English Version translates " pure myrrh," but which others render "free" or "sponta- neous myrrh." Upon the handles of the holt. Where the Bridegroom's hands had been. Every memorial of Christ's presence, every outward thing connected with the records of his presence, becomes to the Church an 1 Cyril : Td OTafyvra fffivpvav \iyu to. b/MoXoyovvra x^V T ^> v Odvarov. 204 THE SONG OP SONGS. [V. 5. incentive to that self-devotion whereby she becomes a partaker in the fellowship of his sufferings. Whether at times an excessive importance has not been attached to such outward memorials, it is not perhaps needful here to enquire. The forms which the career of self- denial inspired by them has assumed may not be in every case such as to obtain universal approval: the spirit of such career can hardly fail to be commended and admired. At a comparatively late period the most memorable display of it consisted in the sacrifices made by Christian Europe in the wars of the Crusades to recover the sepulchre of the Redeemer from the hands of the infidels. My beloved had turned and was gone. A testimony that the manifestations of Christ's presence in such appearances as that from heaven to the apostle Paul, or in the outward miracles wrought by the early believers, were not intended to be more than temporary. They were, at the first, proofs of his resurrection : after a time such proofs were no longer needed. There were those who were permitted to see that so they might be- lieve ; but it was at the same time declared, " Blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed." For what he had spoken. Our English Version has " when he spake." As a rendering of the Hebrew either is admissible. The Hebrew verb is in the infinitive ; and when transferred into the indicative must be ex- pressed in the present, the preterite-perfect, or the pre- terite-pluperfect, according to circumstances. Here the reference must be to the words uttered by the Bride- groom when he first presented himself at the door, V. 6.] THE ABSENCE. 205 ver. 2; for there is no record of his speaking subse- quently. / sought him, hut I did not find him, See back, in. 2. It is observed by Hengstenberg that there is an undeniable reference to these words in what is said by our Lord, Joh. vu. 33, 34: " Yet a little while am I with you, and then I go unto him that sent me. Ye shall seek me, and shall not find me: and where I am, thither ye cannot come"; and also in Joh. viii. 21: "I go my way, and ye shall seek me, and shall die in your sins : whither I go, ye cannot come." The verbal refer- ence cannot indeed be well gainsaid : it does not how- ever necessarily lead to the two conclusions which have been partially based upon it, that the Bride of the Song is the Jewish nation, not the Church of God, and that her inability to find her Beloved is to be viewed as a judgment upon her for her previous sin and neglect. The former conclusion would, in identifying the Bride with the Jewish nation, tear asunder the Song of Songs from the whole of the rest of the Old Testament, the promises of which pertained to the Jews only so long as they remained the Church of God, and have now, since their rejection as a nation, passed to the Universal Church of Christ. The other corresponding conclusion, which would view the Bride as here punished for her previous sin by the withdrawal of her Beloved, is not in harmony with what had been said in the preceding verse of myrrh dropping from her hands. For if that imply, as it must imply, that she sought him with de- vout mortification and self-denial, it is certain, from all that Scripture tells us of God's dealings, that her prayers 206 THE SONG OF SONGS. [V. 6. could not be refused, so far as the fulfilment of them did not interfere with God's higher purposes of love. The words " Seek and ye shall find" must ever hold good for all that seek devoutly: it is only the wild cry of remorse and despair, the cry of a conviction which implies no real conversion of heart, that fails to obtain mercy from the heavenly throne of grace. That the Jewish seeking of Christ after he had quitted this eartli was not a godly seeking of him is shewn by our Sa- viour's own words, " Ye shall seek me, and shall die in your sins." For the true illustration of this passage of the Song we must look rather to our Lord's discourse of love to his disciples than to his controversy with his Jewish opponents. In Joh. XIII. 33 he says to his dis- ciples : " Little children, yet a little while I am with you. Ye shall seek me : and as I said unto the Jews. Whither I go, ye cannot come; so now 1 say to you." It is sufficiently evident that though the actual an- nouncement was in each case the same, it was neverthe- less made in a different spirit. Our Lord departed from his disciples not because they had not received him while he was present with them, but because it was ex- pedient for their highest interests that he should go away. It is of such a departure that the passage before us speaks. Nevertheless when we read of the Bride seeking but not finding her Beloved, calling him but gaining no answer, it may be fairly asked whether the Church may not at times have longed too impa- tiently after Christ's outward presence; whether the "Even so, come, Lord Jesus" of truest love may not V. 6„] THE ABSENCE. 207 occasionally, through the lack of perfect faith, have unduly overpowered her appreciation of her present career of earthly labour and waiting. Something of this kind the apostle Paul, ardently as he loved the Lord's appearing, had to check in his Thessalonian con- verts by the second epistle which he addressed to them. And the same spirit may he traced in the post-apostolic times in the millcnnarian expectations of the earlier Christian Fathers, IrensBUS, Justin, &c. ; which the Church gradually shook off, as she attained to that sounder understanding of Scripture, and that healthier view of the contest to be waged against the world, which we find in the writings of Augustine. The watchmen, dOc. Cf. in. 3. The material and essential difference between that passage and the present is that the watch- men are here represented as persecuting the Bride in her search for her Beloved. They smite her, they wound her, they treat her with contumely. The watchmen in III. 3 were explained to be the prophets of the Old Tes- tament Church. Those here must correspondingly re- present the teachers in the Church of the New Testa- ment, together with all who exercise authority within her, and to whom the phrase "the watchmen of the walls" seems in an especial manner to point. If this interpre- tation be correct, we must infer that the Church of the Gospel was to suffer bitterly from her own ministers and ecclesiastical rulers. Whether such has not been the case, whether at different periods many of her mem- bers, who have loved the Lord Jesus Christ most truly, have not, individually and aggregately, been persecuted, 208 THE SONG OF SONGS. [v. 7. held up to public disgrace, unjustifiably excommuni- cated, and martyred, it must be the province of history to tell. My covering mantle. It seems to be generally agreed that the word TTl, occurring here and at Isaiah III. 23, denotes a wide and thin garment such as East- ern ladies to the present day throw over all the rest of their dress. The Germans well translate it Schleierkleid, " veil-garment." i" adjure you, &c. The adjuration is both different from and somewhat shorter than that which we had before. ! declare ye to him. Others translate, " What will ye tell him?" But the words are rather the expression of a very earnest entreaty. THE PKESENCE. v. 9 — vm. 4. 14 But Thou hast made it sure By Thy dear promise to Thy Church and Bride, That Thou, on earth, would'st aye with her endure, Till earth to heaven be purified. Keble. 9 Chorus. What is thy beloved more than another beloved, fairest among women? What is thy beloved more than another beloved, That thou dost so adjure us? 10 Bride. My beloved is bright and ruddy, Foremost among ten thousand. 11 His head is finest gold; His locks flow flowingly, black as the raven ; 12 His eyes are as doves upon brooks of water, Bathed in milk, resting upon fulness ; 13 His cheeks are as a bed of spices, with towering heights of perfume-herbs ; His lips are lilies, they drop with liquid myrrh; 14 His hands are folding-panels of gold, inlaid with chrysolites ; His chest is shining ivory, covered o'er with sapphires ; 15 His legs are pillars of marble, fixed on pedestals of fine gold ; His appearance is as Lebanon, princely as the cedars : 16 His tongue is sweetest sweetness, and he is all love- liest loveliness, — Such is my beloved, and such my friend, daughters of Jerusalem. 14—2 212 THE SONG OF SONGS. vi. 1. Chorus. Whither is thy beloved gone, O fairest among women? Whither is thy beloved turned, That we may seek him with thee? 2 Bride. My beloved is gone down into his garden, To the beds of spices, To feed his flock in the gardens, and to gather lilies. 3 I am my beloved's, and my beloved is mine, He who feedeth his flock among the lilies. 4 Beloved. Beautiful art thou, my love, as Tirzah, Comely as Jerusalem, Dazzling as an army with banners. 5 Turn thou thine eyes against me, For they swell my heart with pride ! Thy hair is like a flock of goats Hanging down the slope of Gilead : 6 Thy teeth are like a flock of ewes Coming up from the wash-pool, All appearing in pairs, And not a lone one amongst them : 7 Like a slice of pomegranate are thy temples Behind thy plaits. 8 Sixty there are of queens, and fourscore of concubines, And damsels without number : 9 But one is she, my dove, my own one, An only one of her mother, her parent's sole darling is she : THE PRESENCE. 213 The daughters saw her, and called her blessed; The queens and the concubines, and praised her. 10 Chorus. Who is she that looketh forth as the morn, Fair as the argent-orb, pure as the orb of day, Dazzling as an army with banners? 11 Bride. I went down into the garden of nuts, To inspect the green shoots of the valley, To see whether the vine were sprouting, Whether the pomegranates were budding : 12 Or ever I was aware, my sold had made me The chariots of my people the Freewilling. 13 Chorus. Return, return, thou Peace-laden ! Return, return, that we may gaze upon thee ! Bride. On what will ye gaze in the Peace-laden? Chorus. As it were the dance of the Twofold Camp. vii. 1 Beloved. How beautiful are thy steps in the sandals, daughter of the Freewilling ! The mouldings of thy thighs are like jewels, the work of the hands of a master : 2 Thy navel is a round goblet, — be not liquor wanting,- Thy belly a heap of wheat, set about with lilies. Thy two breasts are like two youqg twins, fawns of a gazelle ; 4 Thy neck is a tower of ivory ; Thine eyes as the pools in Heshbon, by the gate whose name is Multitude ; 3 214 THE SONG OF SONGS. Thy nose as the tower of Lebanon that looketh to- ward Damascus ; o Thy head upon thee is like Carmel, And the tresses of thine head like royal purple, Enfixed amid the wainscottings. C How fair art thou, how delightfully lovely, daugh- ter of allurements ! 7 Chorus. This thy stature is like a palm-tree, And thy breasts like clusters of fruit ; 8 And I say, Let me climb this palm-tree, Let me take hold of its branches, And be thy breasts now as clusters of the vine, And the smell of thy breath as citrons, 9 And thy speech as goodly wine, Which, going straight to my beloved, Causeth the lips of the sleepers to speak. 10 Bride. I am my beloved's, and his desire is to- ward me. 1 1 Come, my beloved, let us go forth into the field, Let us sojourn in the villages ; 12 Let us start early to the vineyards, Let us see whether the vine be sprouting, Whether the blossoms open, Whether the pomegranates bud : There will I give thee my love. 13 The mandrakes yield forth a fragrance, And at our doors are all precious fruits, THE PRESENCE. 215 Both new and old, Which I have treasured up, my beloved, for thee ! that thou wouldest appear as brother of mine, As one that had sucked the breasts of my mother ! Should I find thee without, I would kiss thee, And eke they should not despise me. 1 would hasten thee away to my mother's house, that so thou mightest teach me ; I would cause thee to drink of spiced wine, of the juice of my pomegranate : His left hand should be under my head, And his right hand should embrace me. I adjure you, daughters of Jerusalem, 0.! that ye upstir not, and 0! that ye disturb not The play of love till it will it ! It has been already explained that the present sec- tion of the Song sets forth the* permanent spiritual relation between Christ and his redeemed Church. Al- though outwardly linked on to what went before by the enquiries of the daughters of Jerusalem in v. 9, " What is thy beloved that thou dost so adjure us?" and in vi. 1, "Whither is thy beloved gone.... that we may seek him with thee?" it contains none of the com- plaint or lamentation by which the preceding section was distinguished. The periods of action over which the two sections extend are contemporaneous. The scenes displayed in them are opposite in character, but 216 THE SONG OF SONGS. [V. 9. not therefore mutually inconsistent; for the spiritual presence of Christ is not inconsistent with his bodily absence. As the preceding section was the shortest in the Song, so this is the longest. It consists of thirty- eight verses, which fall, by a symmetrical arrangement, into five main subdivisions, pieces, or groups. The central piece is formed by the four verses vi. 10—13. From their condensed and enigmatical character they are, as is frequently the case with the central pieces or verses of Hebrew poetry, very difficult to construe ; and their meaning, comparatively seldom understood, has been frequently wrested to senses utterly foreign to the true intent of the Song. Literalizing criticism has here, from the nature of the case, been especially at fault. The real theme of these verses is the grandeur and might which, through the abiding presence of Christ with her, the Church possesses. They are enclosed by two groups of nine verses each, vi. 1—9, vil. 1 — 9, both of which, though themselves admitting of further sub- division, are mainly occupied with Christ's praise of the comeliness of his Bride. The two outside groups, V. 9 — 16, vil. 10 — VIII. 4, consist each of eight verses. The former records the testimony of the Church to the graces of Christ: the latter displays her joy in com- muning with him, and her desire for his second ap- pearing. V. 9 — 16. Wliat is thy beloved, &c. That the dra- matic form may be preserved, a question is here put by the Chorus of the Daughters of Jerusalem, in order to furnish occasion to the description which follows. Mi/ V. 10.] THE PRESENCE. 217 beloved is bright and ruddy. Our English Version, following in the wake of other versions, renders " white and ruddy;" and interpretations of somewhat fanciful character have been based on the assumed contrariety of the two epithets here employed. But in the absence of all further indication of their contrariety, it is more natural to suppose that they were intended to har- monize: in fact, had it been otherwise, the Hebrew word )1^, " bright," " clear," would have been replaced by one which was more definitely restricted to the mean- ing "white." The bright glow of the Beloved's coun- tenance well accords with what we read of the appear- ance of the Lord Jesus Christ in the Revelation, I. 16, " his countenance was as the sun shineth in his strength." It betokens his native strength and energy; not unlike to that of the sun, " which is as a bridegroom coming out of his chamber, and rejoiceth as a strong man to run a race." Foremost among ten thousand. Distin- guished above all the meaner throng as being marked out by his native perfection of comeliness for their fitting leader. Cf. Rom. viii. 29, " that he might be the first- born among many brethren." His head is finest gold. His essential royalty and his sterling and incomparable preciousness are here expressed. His locks flow flow- ingly (we may thus imitate the reduplication with which the Hebrew word is formed), black as the raven. These again are suggestive of the fulness of manly vigour. The association of the hair with manly strength would be especially natural to those who were familiar with the history of Samson. It is moreover to be observed 218 THE SONG OF SONGS. [v. 11. that the hair and the locks of which this verse speaks are the same which had previously, in v. 2, been de- scribed as filled with dew, with the drops of the night ; from which it may be gathered that the perfection of royal might of the Beloved Bridegroom had been un- impaired by the career of mortal suffering through which it had been his lot to pass. His eyes are as doves upon brooks of water. It was the Bride's eyes which had been previously compared to doves, I. 15, iv. 1. The first point of comparison is here the unbesoiled purity of the two things compared. From this we are led on to the associations which they respectively love. The dove chooses for its abode the neighbourhood of a run- ning stream, where the scene over which it flits tells of a purity corresponding to and harmonizing with its own. So is it on scenes of moral purity that he, who is himself free from everything that defileth, loves peacefully to gaze. His eyes are purer than to behold evil, and cannot look on iniquity, Hab. I. 13. Bathed in milk, resting upon fulness. These two phrases, which belong to the eyes, not to the doves, illustrate respectively the two points of the comparison in the previous line. In regard of that purity by reason of which they resemble doves, the eyes of the Beloved Bridegroom are as pure from all defilement as if they had been fresh bathed in milk : this relates to the appearance which they themselves present. The remainder relates to the ob- jects on which they choose to gaze: they "rest upon fulness," even as the doves "upon brooks of water": the use of the same preposition, 7^, " upon," shews that V. 12.] THE PRESENCE. 219 the two phrases are mutually illustrative. And the ful- ness which the Bridegroom contemplates is that fulness of all that is good and lovely and holy which is to be seen in the church by reason of the outpouring of the fulness of his own graces upon it, Eph. I. 23. This Christ loves to behold : this he selects as an appropriate abode, because its purity is akin to his own, even as the outward purity of the stream to that of the dove. His cheeks are as a bed of spices. The cheeks are that part of the face in which its charms come most prominently into view : it is therefore the loveliness of the heavenly Bridegroom that is here set forth. It is remarked by Hengstenberg that the Hebrew word for cheeks has an etymological reference to their charms. With towering heights of perfume-herbs. The image is that of garden-beds raised in the centre, and therefore resembling cheeks in respect of their convex form. His lips are lilies, they drop with liquid myrrh. Lips come into view as the channel of speech. The thing here symbolized is therefore the holiness*of Christ's teaching, and the self-denying devotion, even unto death, which he should inculcate. The opening portion of the Ser- mon on the Mount, and the " If any man will come after me, let him take up his cross and follow me," will illustrate these characteristics of his discourse. Respect- ing the liquid myrrh, see on V. 5. His hands are fold- ing panels of gold. The word 7 1 zH is applied, as we learn from 1 Kings VI. 34, to the separate portions of a folding door : the doors to the holy of holies of the temple consisted of two leaves, each of which in its turn 220 THE SONG OF SONGS. [V. 14. consisted of two halves or folds. There is no passage in which the word denotes a "ring;" nor would this meaning be here so appropriate. The image is that of a door, not necessarily a large door, constructed in four or five separate folds, corresponding to the appearance presented by the hand when the fingers, while kept in contact with each other, are stretched at full length. The hand, as has been noted on v. 4, is the symbol of power in operation : the divisions of the separate fingers indicate the manifoldness of that power : the gold, its kingliness. Inlaid with chrysolites. For the stone in- tended, see Diet, of the Bible, s.v. Beryl. They be- token the preciousness of Christ's working. His chest is shining ivory. The ordinary Hebrew term for "bowels" is in this passage alone applied to the ex- terior of the human frame. By whatever precise term we render it, we shall not go substantially wrong, pro- vided we remember that, as one of the main and central portions of the body, it here, in a general way, represents the whole body ; and so, the person of the Lord Jesus Christ incarnate. Purity and preciousness are here again the qualities insisted on. Ivory comes before us as the purest substance of its kind : the preciousness of Christ's person is expressed by the sapphires with which the ivory is overlaid. The sapphire is here selected, because, being of a blue or azure colour, it is the gem which harmonizes best with ivory in its appearance. His legs are pillars of marble, fixed on pedestals of fine gold. Again the same qualities symbolized. Marble stands for purity, gold for royal worth. The marble legs V. 15.] THE PEESENCE. 221 set forth at the same time Christ's immovable faithful- ness : he is the Rock of ages, " Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever." Observe also that the " fine gold" of the feet towards the close of the description corresponds to the "finest gold" of the head towards the beginning of it, ver. 11; "so that from crown to foot he shines entire with unmeasured glory and majesty" (J. H. Michaelis). His appearance is as Lebanon, princely as the cedars. The delineation of the details of his person having been now concluded, his general nobility and princeliness come again, as in ver. 10, into view. As Lebanon among mountains, as the cedars of Lebanon among trees, such is he among men, first and foremost, bearing in his whole appear- ance the stamp of native matchlessness. And thus then the Bride has answered the question of the Daughters of Jerusalem, " What is thy beloved more than another beloved?" But although her reply to them is complete, yet the very process of enumerating the graces of his person leads her, in the fulness of her appreciation of them, to desire spontaneously to proclaim them with all possible emphasis of language, and so there yet follows in ver. 16 one further testimony to his perfections. His tongue is sweetest siceetness. Literally, " His palate is sweetnesses." The palate is here mentioned merely as the organ #f speech, and must therefore, if we would re- tain the substantial meaning, be replaced in an English translation by the tongue. The plural "sweetnesses" manifestly expresses the intensity of sweetness. From this and the following clause, " he is all loveliest love- 222 THE SONG OF SONGS. [v. 16. liness," we gather that the two great themes of the Bride's encomiums on her Beloved are, first, his speech, and secondly, his whole person. Alike in the teaching of Christ, and in his whole life and work, must we recognize that holy purity and that majestic strength which commend him to us as precious, and which pro- claim him the king of men. VI. 1 — 9. Whither is thy beloved gone, &c. Another question from the Daughters of Jerusalem, suggested in the first instance by the section v. 2 — 8 and by the Bride's final charge therein, gives occasion to the Bride to declare whither her Beloved is really gone. It will be observed that there is no uncertainty in her answer; and this shews that his relation to her is contemplated in a different point of view from that in which it had in V. 2 — 8 been exhibited to us. Then further this rela- tion, so expressly set forth by the Bride in verses 2, 3, is appropriately unfolded in the six verses that follow by an address from the Beloved himself to the Bride. If dramatic consistency were strictly adhered to, we should have to regard this passage, together with VII. 1 — 9, as a narrative by the Bride of the words which had been addressed to her. It may in fact be so treated; but at the same time the dramatic form into which the Song is cast is so loose, that it is very far from neces- sary, in perusing these passages, to perplex ourselves with the thought that the words of the Beloved come to us at second-hand. My beloved is gone down into his garden. The garden which had been described in I v. 12 — v. 1. See especially v. 1, "I am come into my VI. 2.] THE PRESENCE. 223 garden, &c." Note, in the Hebrew of this verse, not only the rhyme between D^^Q and D'O^'I^, but also the resemblance in sound between ni^YTy? and HIJTD. To the beds of spices. See IV. 14. To feed Ms flock in the gardens, and to gather lilies. See on II. 16. Under the dispensation of the gospel, no less than under that of the older covenant, Christ nurtures his people in the purity of holiness. But he now not only feeds his flock among lilies, but also gathers lilies; gathers with joy and acceptance from his people those fruits of holiness which through the grace of his Spirit they are con- tinually bringing forth. The "garden" refers to the Christian body in its unity, the "gardens" denotes its manifoldness : in the New Testament we read, as Theo- doret remarks, alike of the church and of the churches. / am my beloved's, &c. Compare II. 16. Beautiful art thou, my love, as Tirzah. The city of Tirzah is men- tioned by Joshua, xn. 24, and was evidently in the tribe either of Ephraim or Manasseh. After the separa- tion of the kingdoms it became the residence of the earlier kings of Israel, till Omri built the new capital of Samaria. See 1 Kings xiv. 17; XV. 21, 33; xvi. 6, 8, 9, 15, 17, 23. Even in days long subsequent it still re- tained somewhat of its former importance, being the head-quarters whence Menahem commenced his success- ful struggle for the throne, 2 Kings xv. 14, 16. Robin- son is disposed to identify it with the modern Talluzah, to the east of Samaria, and the north-east of Shechem; being probably the same place with that mentioned by Brocardus as Thersa, and by Schwarz as Tarza. This 224 , THE SONG OF SONGS. [VL 4. village lies in a high and commanding position; looking out towards the west over the high table-land spreading north from Mount Ebal, and towards the east over an extensive fertile district drained by one of the streams that flows into the Jordan. It is surrounded by im- mense groves of olive-trees, planted on all the hills around (Later Bib. Ees. pp. 302, 3). The comparison of the Bride to Tirzah was the more appropriate as the name Tirzah signifies Pleasant. Comely as Jerusalem. The correspondence with the preceding clause shews that the reference is mainly to the site of Jerusalem, especially as beheld from the south. This may still be best described in the words of Tacitus: "Duos colles, immensum editos, claudebant muri, per artem obliqui, aut introrsus sinuati." Of the two hills on which Jeru- salem thus stood, the western was the hill of the Old or Upper City: the eastern, the hill of the Lower City, or Temple-mount. Both the comparison to Jerusalem and that to Tirzah bespeak something noble and command- ing in the Bride's appearance. Dazzling as an army ivith banners. The comparison well sets forth the ma- jesty of the Church in all her manifold array. But it also indirectly betokens that she has set out upon a career of victory. It was perhaps suggested by the account, in Num. II, of the order of the tribes of Israel, when marshalled in their encampment under their seve- ral standards. Turn thou thine eyes against me, for they swell my heart with pride/ Some vindication of this rendering will here be necessary ou account of the dif- ference between it and the rendering of our English VI. 5.] THE PRESENCE. 225 Version. It is hardly possible that 'H^ft should here mean "from me." There are cases, no doubt, in which "from before" and "from" are convertible, and there- fore nearly equivalent : e. g. Isaiah I. 16, Jer. xvi. 17. But would "Turn thine eves from before me" be a it natural mode of expression ? For howsoever turned, her eyes would still be " before him;" not so dazzling, doubtless, as when they gazed full upon him, yet still unmoved in point of actual position, and unconcealed. We might indeed, interchanging the persons, declare that the eyes of the Beloved would be no longer before the Bride, when she should cease to gaze ; but we should thus be introducing a meaning to which the Hebrew words, as we have them, could not lead. We must then take *"U3fo not as involving motion, but in its frequent and indeed most usual sense of " opposite," "over against," cf. Gen. xxi. 16; Num. n. 2; Deut. xxviii. 66; 2 Kings II. 7. &c. The V2 answers to the Latin ex in the phrases "ex hac parte," &c. : we in English use instead the preposition on, of which the a in "against" (Ang.-Sax. "ongegen") is merely the con- traction ; though even in our language on and of are often vulgarly interchanged (" of this side," &c. : cf. the word "off"). The only motion implied in the passage before us is entirely expressed by the ^DPl " turn thou;" and the full meaning is, " Thou who art stand- ing over against me, bend thou thine eyes so as directly to meet mine 1 ." Having compared his Bride to an army 1 It admits of some doubt how the LXX. intended to take this passage, when they rendered it airbbo occasionally means "to turn" rather than "to turn away:" see the Greek rendering of i Kings vin. 14; 2 Kings xx. 1 (Vatican text: only two MSS. beside the Alexandrine there read t/ev). As to airtvavTlov, it signifies simply "opposite." So that the meaning of the Greek may be, " Turn thine eyes opposite me, for they enkindle my expectations;" which would be correct so far as concerned the earlier words. VI. 8.] THE PRESENCE. 227 embodiment; and it is therefore important to remark that in the present passage the queens and concubines are brought before us with reference only to the rela- tions in which they severally stand to the Bridegroom, not to the relations in which he stands to them. These last the poet in no wise contemplates : the only senti- ments of the Bridegroom which he unfolds are those sentiments of pure and devoted love to his one chosen Bride in which we read the love of Christ to his re- deemed Church. Whom then do the queens, concu- bines, and damsels here represent ? The general answer to this question seems to be correctly given by Theodoret; whose judicious and discriminating use of the exegetical labours of his predecessors may be tested by a com- parison of his commentary on this passage with the ex- position of it in the Homilies of Gregory of Nyssa. They are men, or bodies of men, outwardly drawn to Christ by motives that fall short of genuine love. There are many communities, or even nations, that are attracted to Christ by outward splendour; or (as Theodoret takes it) there are souls that seek Christ merely with an eye to future reward. These are queens : queens, but not really brides or consorts ; devoted to the king's rank and honours rather than to his person. Again there are others who (as Theodoret explains it) render a slavish obedience, being urged thereto by fear of hell rather than by any nobler motive; or who (as we may also add) obey through constraint rather than through free love. These are concubines ; but not true partners. There are others again who as damsel-attendants (Theo- 15—2 228 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VI. 8. doret's explanation is here not so good) look on ap- provingly at the approach of others to Christ, and even assist in that approach with their several ministrations, but apparently without a full personal interest in it. In contrast to all these stands the One Church Catholic who loves Christ for his own sake, with such love as a true servant of Christ, Francis Xavier, has delineated in the beautiful hymn, " O Deus ego amo te." She can be but One; because the very love wherewith she loves Christ displays itself in an active love to all who are Christ's, and thus practically unites all her members together. " By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another." As regards the " sixty" and the " eighty," we have of course in each case a definite number for an indefinite. The choice of the particular numbers seems to have been mainly dictated by a studied avoidance of the number seventy, to which a certain sacredness and completeness would have at- tached. It is no harmonious covenant-relationship in which the queens and the concubines stand to Christ : all is with them imperfect, and wide of the mark. A directly opposite view is erroneously taken by Hengsten- berg. My dove, my own one. See on v. 2. An only one of her mother, her parent's sole darling. For the same reason that TlftH, lit. " my perfect one," maybe rendered "my own one," may JTli, lit. "pure one" (not as English Version, "choice one") be rendered " sole darling." The exact meaning of the adjective is this, that she is her parent's exclusive child, that she constitutes her mother's entire offspring, and absorbs VI. 9.] THE PRESENCE. 229 lier undivided affections. She is her parent's "mere one"; and this would in fact be the "best rendering, had not the word "mere," in its original sense, become somewhat antiquated. The two phrases " an only one of her mother" and "her parent's sole darling," do not therefore differ substantially in meaning. And both are but little more than metaphorical expressions, intended to bring out the matchlessness of the Church of Christ. She has none to share her glories: as a church, she alone, in her ideal and ultimate purity, is the true child of the Jerusalem which is above, which is the mother of us all. The daughters saw her, and called her blessed. Hengstenberg justly observes that this passage rests on Gen. xxx. 13, " And Leah said, Happy am I, for the daughters will call me blessed." We may perhaps infer from this that the word " daughters" is here used gene- rally for " women": at the same time, as the queens and the concubines are mentioned in the next line, there seems to be no valid objection against taking the " daughters" as identical with the damsels of the pre- ceding verse. VI. 10 — 13. The central verses of the section. Ver. 10 is uttered by the Chorus of the Daughters of Jerusalem; vv. 11, 12, by the Bride herself; and ver. 13, in the main, by the Chorus, the question " On what will ye gaze, &c." in the mouth of the Bride being merely subservient to their eulogy. Thus then two verses in which the Bride speaks are enclosed by two in which the Chorus speak. Who is she that looketh forth as the morn. Hopeful brightness is here the point 230 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VI. 10. of comparison ; a brilliant morning being but the commencement of a brilliant day. Compare Isaiah lx. 1 seqq., where it is prophetically said to the Church, "Arise, shine; for thy light is come, and the glory of the Loud is risen upon thee And the Gentiles shall come to thy light, and kings to the brightness of thy rising." Fair as the argent-orb, pure as the orb of day. An attempt has been made to translate poetically the unusual terms by which the sun and moon are here, and in Isaiah xxiv. 23, xxx. 26, poetically designated. The points of comparison are indicated by the epithets employed. It is noted by commentators that the com- parisons which we have in this verse are frequently found in Eastern poetry, particularly in that of the Arabs and Persians. Something of the same kind we have in Ecclesiasticus L. 6, 7, in the description of the high-priest Simon, the son of Onias. Dazzling as an army with banners. See above, vi. 4. The reason of this is now about to be explained. The spiritual presence of Christ with his Church has equipped her for the conflict which she is to sustain against all the opposing powers of the world. / went down into the garden of nuts. Such is the rendering of the LXX, Syriac, and Jerome. It has been generally followed by other translators. They confirm it by observing that the word T121X " nut," although not found elsewhere in the Bible, is frequently used in Kabbinic Hebrew; and that a corresponding word, divested of the initial X, exists in Syriac and in Persian. Yet there are objections to this rendering. The singular number of the word VOtf is, VI. 11.] THE PRESENCE. 231 to say the least, somewhat awkward. And then it is not easy to see why the garden should, in this important passage, be specially spoken of as a garden of nuts, when nuts are not so much as mentioned though out the rest of the Song. The following is the explanation given by Hengstenberg : "The garden is called a nut- garden only a potiori. That its appellation should here be derived from its nuts, while in II. 13 the foreground is occupied by the fig-tree and vine, arises out of the endeavour to embrace in the picture the whole of the riches offered by the holy land in noble products of the vegetable kingdom. Parallel to this is the endeavour to introduce into the representation as many local scenes of the holy land as possible." This, the best explana- tion that has been given in vindication of the current rendering, is not thoroughly satisfactory. Tremellius and Junius would derive TUtf from the root 1U, and make it signify "pruning:" "ad hortos putatos (Heb. putationis) descenderam." This is hardly probable, as TT3 denotes not "to prune" but "to shear." Mean- while is it certain that the received Hebrew text is correct '? The Targum on this passage (we quote it, for convenience' sake, in Walton's Latin Version) runs as follows : " Dixit dominator seculi : In domo sanctuarii secunda qiue aidificata est per manum Cyri, habitare feci majestatem meam." The garden is here interpreted of the divine sanctuary, as usual; but why should the building which was reared by Zerubbabel and Jeshua be here connected exclusively with the name of the heathen Cyrus ? We are naturally led to suppose that 232 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VI. 11. the Targumist found a hint about the heathen in the Hebrew text. He may well for T13tf have read ^jn or *")37- -And the bearing of his paraphrase upon the Hebrew text is to us all-important, however wide of the mark may be his view of its meaning. That a transcriber may have changed a * into a T will be readily allowed, as the two letters probably resembled each other in the older Hebrew alphabet. It is less easy to shew how the TlJtf of our present text should have illegitimately acquired its initial &: it might have arisen from the tf of the 7X, the transcriber's eye having passed by mistake from the final H of H13 to the final fl at the close of the preceding verse. The text at which we have thus conjecturally arrived would construe some- what as follows: "I went down into the garden of the throng"; and on comparing this with the succeeding verse, the general import would be that those whom the Bride had once known as a mere heathen throng, ^J, had suddenly become to her a clmrchly people, U$. The passage would thus proclaim, along with other truths, the organization of the Gentiles into the Church of God : cf. Hos. i. 10, " It shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people, there it shall be said unto them, Ye are the sons of the living God." We should not be justi- fied, with the difficulty of the tf and the testimony of the older versions against us, in definitely adopting this emendation ; but there is a fair probability of its cor- rectness, and we cannot view the received text otherwise than with suspicion. Moreover even the older versions VI. 11.] ; THE PRESENCE. 233 do not necessarily confirm the K : they might have read Ti^Pl. To inspect the green shoots of the valley. The word Itf "shoot" (not as E. V. "fruit") occurs but in one other place, Job vm. 12, where our E.y. renders it " greenness." Of the corresponding Arabic root Schultens says " varias agnoscit notiones, quas revocari possunt ad micattonem, emicationem.r The word indicates therefore a state of growth, and conse- quent immaturity. As regards the " valley," the men- tion of it is peculiar to this passage of the Song ; and the " I went down " of the preceding clause carries a manifest reference to the fact of the garden of which the Bride here speaks being situate in a valley. The features then of the description on which stress is here laid differ considerably from those to which attention had in other passages been directed. The picture, if we may venture to complete it, is that of a daughter of Israel descending from her abode on the hill, where in safe seclusion she had dwelt, to the nursery of young plants which surrounded her in the valley below, and which, although hitherto mainly occupied in labours on her own limited demesne, she feels that she must regard as also committed to her care. That daughter of Israel is the Church of God ; the hill of her abode is the land of Canaan, where the descen- dants of Jacob have instructed successive generations of the children of their own race in that knowledge of God which they have received; and the valley around is the Gentile world, where God is also prepar- ing for himself a spiritual garden, and whither Israel- 234 THE SONG OF SONGS. [vi. 11. itish apostles and teachers must go forth to train up souls without number in true and holy faith. Yet it was difficult for the daughter of Israel to realize that tl^ese plantations in the valley were to become in God's good time a paradise no less glorious than the hill- enclosure which she had hitherto accounted peculiarly her own. To see whether the vine were sprouting, whether the pomegranates were budding. To see whether there might be discerned any tokens that heralded a yielding forth of the fruits of righteousness, cf. ir. 13. The history of Cornelius sufficiently shews that even in the Gentile world such tokens existed. Or ever I ivas aware. The Church of ancient days knew not the grandeur that she should eventually attain. Even when, after their Lord's ascension, the apostles went forth from Jerusalem to preach to all nations the gospel which they had received, they hardly dreamed what an army of spiritual warriors, soldiers of Christ no less than them- selves, should rapidly spring up from all regions of the earth, to join in the Christian conflict against the powers of darkness. It was contrarily to all his previ- ous expectations that Peter found himself compelled to acknowledge of the Gentiles to whom he had himself become the first minister of the tidings of salvation, that " God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us ; and put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith " (Acts xv. 8, 9). My soul had made me the chariots of my people the Freewill- iii'j. Let our first care be to explain the designation VI. 12.] THE PRESENCE. 235 "the Freewilling," here assigned to the newborn people of God. For that it is a special designation, and is to be viewed in the light of a proper name and not of a mere epithet, is shewn by the adjective being used in Hebrew without the article, although after a noun made definite by a suffix. Now both the verb ll"0 and the adjective 1H3 {nadib) are, in the earliest passages in which they occur, employed to denote willing liberality in a sacred cause, spontaneous readiness to make offerings in the service of God, Exod. xxv. 2 ; xxxv. 5, 21, 22, 29. The verb in the Hithpael conjugation thus appro- priately signifies the making that noblest and truest of offerings, the offering of oneself; Judg. v. 2, 9; 2 Chron. XVII. 16; Neh. XI. 2. It is manifest that no offering whatever can be thoroughly genuine, where the heart of the offerer has not first offered itself; and thus the adjective 5HJ must, in its highest sense, ex- press this self-dedication. Such is its meaning here. The essential characteristic of the true people of God, more especially of his Christian people, on whom no bondage of outward constraint is imposed, is that they have dedicated themselves freely to his service. Most justly then is the description of them summed up in this one word, the Freewilling. And the present verse of the Song manifestly implied, although without di- rectly asserting it, that God should eventually have such a people, to serve under his banner, and to shew forth his praise. Strongly illustrative of it, and indeed connected with it, is the passage in Psalm CX, where it is said to the Messiah, " Thy people shall be willing 236 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VI. 12. (lit. shall be free-will offerings) in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness." Next, what is meant by the Bride being made " the chariots " of the people ? (All translations which introduce a preposition before "the chariots "— " on," "to," "among," "on account of," &c. are grammatically untenable.) Two passages in the Books of Kings will help us to the true interpretation. In 2 Kings n. 12 Elisha calls Elijah " the chariot and the horsemen of Israel." In 2 Kings xin. 14 King Joash addresses Elisha by the same title. It is intended that Elijah and Elisha had, each in their turn, been the true strength of Israel : they had been to Israel what chariots are to a military host. So then here the meaning is that the Church had un- consciously and unexpectedly become the source and channel of victorious might to all the willing people of God. But " my soul," she says, had made me. Hengstenberg observes that the soul similarly appears as the seat of courage in Judg. v. 21, "0 my soul, thou hast trodden down strength." The doctrine however here delivered is that as it is a man's own personal courage that nerves others to attend him in the conflict, so is it the unshrinking and devoted zeal with which the Church prosecutes the task set before her that makes her the rally ing-point for all who would join in the service of her Lord. Not to attract them to herself, but simply to do Christ's will, is her own primary and immediate aim ; and meanwhile it is in that direct obedience to Christ that the true magnet of her attrac- tion to others lies. That she really attracts them is VI. 12.] THE PRESENCE. 237 shewn by her speaking of them not as God's people, or as Christ's people, but as "my" people. Before quit- ting this verse, we may arrest any false or onesided in- ferences that might be drawn from it by observing that the strength which the Church communicates to others she derives herself from Christ, and that her influence depends not merely on her own unaided example, but on that presence of the Spirit of Christ of which she partakes. We may remark too how thoroughly the anticipations of the verse agree with those of Isaiah LX. 4 seqq. Return, return, thou Peace-laden ! "Return," that is, "in peace from thy victorious con- flict!" The Chorus of the Daughters of Jerusalem here prophetically celebrate the conquests which the Bride should achieve, and the blessings of divine peace with which, successfully issuing from all her struggles, she should return homeward to enrich her children. The phrase " to return in peace," meaning " to return triumphant from battle," is in the Bible of frequent occurrence: see Josh. x. 21 ; Judg. vin. 9, xi. 31 ; 1 Kings xxn. 28. This obvious source of illustration Hengstenberg has either overlooked or neg- lected, through his desire to identify the return of the Bride with the future return of the Jewish nation in heart to God ; an identification which has but little to recommend it, except that, being found in Cassio- dorus, it is not destitute of ancient authority. As in the previous verse the Bride had bestowed a special designation on the people who should follow her, so here a like designation is bestowed upon herself, expressive 238 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VI. 13. of the triumph reserved for her: "The Shulamith," "The Peace-laden," lit. "the bepeaced." 1 The name is derived from the same root as " Solomon," and stands in partial correspondence with it. The two names differ however in import : " Solomon " is simply " peace- ful," and the contests of war were over ere Solomon's reign began: "Shulamith" is "peace-laden," "peace- crowned," and expresses the triumphant return from an arduous conflict which it was needful, with heroic constancy, to maintain. The latter name implies there- fore a period of struggle as well as a final victory : the chariots of war are the necessary prelude to the home- ward return. And it is of course only through an- ticipation of the ultimate triumph that the Bride can be spoken of as the Peace-laden. Such an anticipation we evidently here have ; and hence the occurrence of the name in this one passage only. The whole meaning is lost when " Shulamith " is treated as the simple and original name of the Bride, as is done by the literal interpreters. That we may ga~e upon thee. All naturally desire to gaze upon a conqueror in the ful- ness of his triumph. As it were the dance of the Twofold 1 The word JVuP-lt" is a feminine verbal noun of a passive form, like the masculines pS-IJl, ?2V , "I>1D, to which may perhaps be added the proper names Ob-is, D"Vin, DK'-IH. Such forms virtually agree with that of the Pual verb, if the long -1 be regarded as compensating for the general omission of the dagesh in the second radical; and, in fact, in the case of the word UJ-iy, several MSS. give in one passage the equivalent form 2|JJ. In the name rMpAV the remembrance of the dagesh is additionally kept up by the actual introduction of it, against all rule, into the third radical. VI. 13.] THE PRESENCE. 239 Camp. The Hebrew term Malianaim, " two camps," " two hosts," recalls the scene of Jacob's vision, when returning from Mesopotamia to Canaan. " Jacob went on his way, and the angels of God met him. And when Jacob saw them, he said, This is God's host : and he called the name of that place Malianaim " (Gen. xxxn. 1, 2). Why Malianaim, not Mahaneh? Why two hosts instead of one? Because the import of the vision was this, that Jacob's own visible host of fol- lowers was being succoured by God's host of ministering spirits, and so that his own natural weakness was being upheld by divine strength from on high. The two hosts were the earthly and the heavenly : the one, marching obediently along its appointed road, found itself in the succouring presence of the other. From the narrative in Genesis the name Malianaim is accord- ingly transferred into the Song, to express the invisible aid by which the company of God's people are reinforced and upheld in the hour of conflict and of danger. The fact of its having (like Shulamith) the article prefixed shews that it is not to be taken as a mere local name, but is to be construed with reference to its etymological and historical significance. As to the dance, dancing was among the Hebrews an expression of joy, Psalm xxx. 11, and, not least, of the joy of victorious triumph. Miriam's companions danced to celebrate the triumph of the passage of the Red Sea (Exod. xv. 20) : Jephthah's daughter would have danced to welcome back her father (Judg. xi. 34) : with dances the women of Israel cele- brated the return of David from his victory over Goliath 240 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VI. 13. (1 Sam. xvill. 6), and that of Judith from the slaughter of Holoferncs and his forces (Judith xv. 12, 13). The substantial meaning then of the clause before us may be expressed in less enigmatical language as follows : "We shall behold the Church of God celebrating with appropriate rejoicings the victory which, through the presence of God's spiritual army with her army, through divine might uplifting her natural weakness, she has been enabled to achieve." Let us here not forget the parallel passage Psalm xxxiv. 7 : " The angel of the Lord encampeth round about them that fear him, and delivereth them." VII. 1 — 9. Through two-thirds, at least, of this passage, the Beloved speaks. It will be seen that the general theme of the eulogy is not so much the comeli- ness of the Church in her retirement, as the graceful dignity with which she goes forth to propagate the faith among men. It is therefore that the description begins from the feet. How beautiful are thy steps in the sandals. There are three passages in other parts of Scripture which have been generally and rightfully adduced in illustration of these words. Isaiah LII. 7 : " How beautiful upon the mountains are the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace, &c." Nalmm I. 15 : " Behold upon the mountains the feet of him that bringeth good tidings, that publisheth peace!" Eph. vi. 15: "Your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace." It is the former two of these passages that bear most directly upon the meaning here. The "steps" indicate the activity of the Church in VII. 1.] THE PKESENCE. 241 bearing forth the tidings of salvation: the "sandals" the due preparation which she makes, and the equip- ment with which she furnishes herself for this Avork. Thou daughter of the Freewilling. In the last verse but one of the preceding chapter, the title " the Free- willing" was applied to the people whom the Church gathered round her standard. Here she herself is de- scribed as the daughter of the Freewilling. There is thus a slight change made in the details of the represen- tation. But the exact relationship is a matter of no great importance. The truth intended to be conveyed is that the Church is the very embodiment, as it were, of willingness. The mouldings of thy thighs are like jewels, the work of the hands of a master. The point of comparison is the beauty and fulness of shape : it is in the beauty of the form to which the jewel is wrought that the evidence of the skill of the artificer is seen. The word Dl/bPl, which we have rendered "moulding," from a root signifying "to turn round," "to turn away," may be well taken as denoting a convex curvature, which, as we follow it, recedes from the eye. The parti- cular eulogy in this clause corresponds appropriately, in respect of the parts of the body described, to the Bride's eulogy on her Beloved in v. 15. And as well-formed limbs contribute to gracefulness and ease of movement, we may read here an encomium on that organization of the Church which adapted her for carrying effectually forth the tidings of salvation. Thy navel is a round goblet, — he not liquor wanting. Note the homoeophony in the Hebrew. The idea to be conveyed is that from 16 242 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VTL 2. the body of the Church flow copious draughts of re- freshment. Cf. John vu. 38, 39 : " He that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water. But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive." "What is thus true of each individual believer is true yet more directly of the Church at large. Thy belly a heap of wheat, set about with lilies. The explanations that have been offered of the origin of this imagery are but conjectural; such as that heaps of newly-threshed wheat were stuck round with thorns, in order to keep off the cattle, and that for the hedge of thorns the poet has here substituted a fence of lilies; or again, that such heaps were surrounded or covered with garlands of flowers, indicating the joy of the husbandman at the return of the harvest. And again the Jewish custom, adduced in illustration by Seidell, of scattering grains upon a newly-married couple, in token of the wish that they might increase and multiply, is, it must be con- fessed, more likely to have sprung from this passage than to have been referred to in it. We must be con- tent to let the figure rest in a certain degree of obscurity. Thus much however is easily seen, that the wheat points to the nourishment which should be found in the Church, the spiritual nourishment of the bread of life; and that the lilies indicate the lovely purity of such nourishment. Moreover it could not well foil to be noticed by Christian interpreters, familiar with the sacramental tokens of the Lord's Supper, that the wheat and the lirpior, the bread and the wine, of this verse VII. 2.] THE PRESENCE. 243 furnish the most obvious sources of strengthening and refreshment. In reference to the view which some commentators, setting the laws of language at defiance, have wished to take of this verse, as though it described not the person but the dress of the Bride, Dr Mason Good observes that in the literal sense of the original there is no indelicacy, and that the bard is merely assuming a liberty, and that in the chastest manner possible, which we are daily conceding in our own age to every painter and sculptor of eminence." But his own translation can hardly be admitted as accurate. Thy two breasts, &c. With reference to these, as the fountains of nourishment, see above, on IV. 5. Thy neclc is as a tower of ivory. To wit, for majestic beauty. In iv. 4, "like the tower of David, &c." which see. It is hardly probable that the tower of David was even ornamented with ivory, as there is in Scripture no in- timation to that effect. Ivory was however imported and used by Solomon (1 Kings x. 18, 22). At a later period Aliab constructed an ivory palace (1 Kings xxn. 39), in imitation, probably, of those of other southern climes, cf. Psalm xlv. 8 ; and this may well have suggested the imaginary tower of ivory to which the j3oet here compares the neck of the Bride. We thus obtain another clue to the true date of the Song. It is mentioned in Kitto's Cyclopaedia, s. v. Ivory, that there exists in India an octagonal ivory hunting-tower, built by Akbar, twenty-four miles to the west of Agra. Thine eyes as the pools in Heshbon. Heshbon, the ancient capital .of the Amorite Sihon, afterwards a 16—2 244 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VII. 4. Levitical city of Israel (Numb. xxi. 26; Josh. xxi. 39, &c.) stood sixteen miles east of the point where the Jordan enters the Dead Sea. The ruins, situate on a low hill commanding a wide prospect, are extensive, though uninteresting in character : there are many cisterns among them, and one considerable reservoir, which some have thought to be one of the pools men- tioned in the present passage, though Irby and Mangles deemed it too insignificant. The comparison here must be explained by recurring to that in v. 12. The eyes of the Beloved were there described as resembling doves upon brooks of water ; as pure, and as resting upon a purity in harmony with their own. Now if the eyes of the Beloved rested upon the eyes of the Bride (cf. vi. 5), the latter would themselves be the brooks of water. They are here compared to the pools of Heshbon; pools, as we may well suppose, into which channels of water abundantly streamed, and in which the purity of the water was in great measure preserved; and which furthermore served for the supply of all that desired. Directed themselves to Christ, and gazing on his lustre, the eyes of the Church become the pools in which the image of Christ is reflected, and in which all the streams of pure doctrine are concentrated. There is moreover here, without much doubt, an etymological allusion to the meaning of the word Heshbon, " thought," " medi- tation," (Aquila, i7n\o, " the lips of the sleepers," the LXX, Syriac, and Aquila apparently concur in reading D'OtJ'l TIDt^, "my lips and teeth;" to which reading the versions of Symmachus and Jerome also lend partial and indirect support. It has, however, the disadvantage of being ungrammatical, the true Hebrew for "my lips and teeth" being 'JE^l , nSB > . Moreover, the received text is decidedly upheld by the VII. 9.] THE PRESENCE. 253 verse exhibits the secret of the attraction which the Church possesses for the Daughters of Jerusalem, and of the influence which she exerts over the hearts of men. The palate, or speech, of the Bride, here compared to goodly wine, represents the prayers and praises which she offers to Christ; which proceed from her directly to him; and which, by so proceeding, induce even the list- less to join in them. For the spiritually asleep are more easily drawn to echo the worship which they hear the Church pouring forth to her Lord, than to respond to the exhortations addressed immediately to themselves. How many slumbering hearts have been waked by the Psalms of David ! Yet those psalms are in general the language of worship, not of admonition. It is by her own reverence and earnestness in worshipping that the Church excites the reverence and earnestness of others : the nearer and more direct her own communion with her Lord, the more surely will she entice others to commune with him also. VII. 10 — viii. 4. The Bride speaks throughout; and describes, in the first four verses, her joy in the company of her Beloved. It is still the spiritual presence of Christ with the Church which is depicted. / am my beloved's. In this affectionate reiteration of what she had before expressed, cf. II. 16, VI. 3, the Bride reveals the whole depth of her love. It is her greatest joy to belong to him who on the mountain of myrrh lias redeemed her unto himself. And his desire is toward Targum, and yields a more appropriate meaning ; we therefore adhere to it. 254 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VII. 10. me. Cf. Psalm xlv. 11, "so shall the king greatly desire thy beauty:" also the last address of the Be- loved, concluding with VII. 6. Ginsburg's rendering, "it is for me (as a duty) to desire him," although grammatically admissible, is less natural, and destroys the expression of mutual love -which, according to the analogy of other passages in the Song, we should here expect. Come, my beloved, let us go forth into the field, Jet us sojourn in the villdtges. The clue to the interpre- tation of these words must be sought in those which follow. It will then appear that they speak not of the exercise of pure meditation (as a comparison of Gen. xxiv. G3 might suggest), but rather of patient labour. In the words of Origen, " The Bride puts in her entreaty in behalf of those that are in need ; and quitting her more domestic associations in the abodes of wealth, she desires to go forth to take the charge over them. It is they who are to her field and villages, the vineyards and the pomegranates for which she cares." And doubtless in this very labour of love she will realize her own communion with her Lord; partly because she is expressly carrying out his will, and because whatever she does for others in his name she does for him ; partly also because his presence and his blessing will accompany her in all her movements, and in all that she thus undertakes for him, she will feel that he is with her. Compare Acts VIII. 4, 25 ; XI. 19 — 21 : " Therefore they that were scattered abroad went everywhere preaching the word And they... preached the gospel in many villages of the Samaritans VII. 11.] THE PRESENCE. 255 And the hand of the Lord was with them." Let us start early. And therefore be diligent in our work, cf. Psalm LXill. 1, &c, Let us see whether, &c. Compare VI. 11. It was thus that the apostles, when they went down to Samaria, Acts viit. 14, had the opportunity of discerning the results of their Master's previous teaching among the Samaritans, and of entering into his labours, as he himself had forewarned them, John IV. 35—38. There will I give thee my love. Where- soever the labours of the Bride or of her Lord had prospered, wheresoever the fruits had appeared which she desired to behold, there, it must be remembered, all became incorporated into the person of the Bride herself. The newest and most distant converts to the Christian faith became, by their conversion, as truly members of the one Catholic and Apostolic Church, as those from whom the tidings of salvation had been by them re- ceived. So that whether it be a Paul or an Onesimus who is proving by his life the devotion of himself to the Lord Jesus Christ, whether it be the original Christian band in Jerusalem or the new-formed Christian band in Home that is labouring for the conversion of fresh souls to him, it is equally the Bride that is yielding her love unto her Lord. Each new local habitation, each fresh centre of labour, in which, through previous loving labour, she establishes herself, will multiply the offerings which she, even " she " and none other, is bringing as proofs of her devotion to him. And thus each new territory which opens itself to her gaze, each new people of the very existence of which she for the first time 256 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VII. 12. hears, commends itself straightway to her as a new channel through which she may convey to her Beloved her love. In illustration of the stress which must thus necessarily be laid on the single word "there," cf. Hosea I. 10, Kom. ix. 26. It was in the true spirit of the Bride's words in this passage that holy Gregory, when he beheld the Anglo-Saxon youths at Kome, declared that they who were the subjects of King Ella must be made to sing Alleluia. The mandrakes yield forth a fragrance. The mandrake, Atropa mandragora, is a low herb, with dark green leaves resembling those of the Belladonna, and a root like that of a carrot. The flower is, according to some, purple : according to others, white and reddish : the fruit, when ripe, in the beginning of May, is of the size and colour of a small apple. The Hebrew name of this plant is held to signify love-plant; and certain peculiar properties are in the East popularly ascribed to it. (See, in Maun- drell's Journey, the account of his interview with the Samaritan Priest : also other references in Kitto's Cyclopaedia.) It is mentioned elsewhere in Scripture only in Gen. xxx. 14 — 16. The fruit, although, according to Maundrell, of an ill savour (Thomson speaks of it as insipid and sickly), is described by Mariti as of a most agreeable odour. At our doors. At the doors of our dwelling, cf. I. 17, and therefore im- mediately surrounding us. All precious fruits. Precious fruits of all kinds, cf. IV. 13. Both new and old. If the fruits represent holy virtues, and holy works, the meaning will be that the Church of the New Covenant VII. 13.] THE PEESENCE. 257 will not only bring forth all such holy works as those by which the saints of olden time obtained a good report, but will also distinguish herself by the practice of duties which were in ancient times comparatively over- looked. It is certainly among the glories of the Chris- tian dispensation to have developed a far stronger sense of the duty of brotherly love, and to have uprooted polygamy, and, in great measure, slavery. At the same time, the present passage distinctly implies that we cannot afford to throw away the burning examples of the deeds of faith of a more imperfect age. With it may be compared Matth. xiii. 52, in which the Lord Jesus Christ recognizes the excellence both of old and of new doctrine. But the reference which some have found here to Levit. xxvi. 10 is uncertain. Which I have treasured up, my beloved, for thee. Compare 2 Cor. v. 9 : " We labour, that, whether present or absent, we may be accepted of him." While this clause sets forth the desire of the Church to consecrate her every work as a love-offering to Christ, it also serves as an introduction to that expression of desire for his more entire presence to which we now proceed. that thou wouldest appear as brother of mine. At length the Song verges towards its conclusion. The Bride, the Church, although blest with the spiritual presence of her Beloved, cannot but long for his personal re-appearing. She desires his outward coming or irapovaia: she desires to behold him once more in the human body which he assumed when at his incarnation he became the brother of man- kind. Why should she not? For indeed this desire, 17 25S THE SONG OF SONGS. [VIII. 1. the desire of all them that love the Lord's appearing, is not inconsistent with an earnest cherishing of his spiritual presence during the season of his personal absence. As one that had sucked the breasts of my mother. It was as the seed of the woman, nurtured by her in infancy, and growing up under her fostering care to maturity, that Christ became, and still remains, our brother, and that as such he will hereafter again reveal himself. The mother, alike of the Bride and of the Beloved, was previously explained of the Jewish nation, and may here, since that restriction is now unnecessary, be taken more generally of the whole human race 1 . Should I find thee without. Or, " in the street" ; in refer- ence to the imagery of III. 2 seqq., v. 7. The case seems here to be purely hypothetical. Origen by "without" understands " without Jerusalem," where Jesus was crucified. This, unfolded by the aid of the New Testa- ment, would lead to the meaning that the Church desires to behold that Lord who was once crucified for her, and who still bears the tokens of his Cross and Passion. But the language of the Song must not be pressed too far. The great desire of the Bride is to find her Be- loved anyhow and anywhere. I would kiss thee. That is, would welcome thy closest presence. The prayer for the Beloved's first appearing was " Let him kiss me," 1.2. And eke they should not despise me. Having now found him whom she had so ardently desired, she should no more be despised and insulted as she had been when 1 Cassiodorus writes: "Mater synagogse in hoc loco ipsa humana natura intelligitur, de qua ipsa synagoga exorta est." VIII. I.] THE PRESENCE. 259 she sought for him through the streets in vain, V. 7. / would hasten thee away to my mother s house. See on III. 4. The substance of the meaning is that such is now her great desire, to gaze upon him in human form upon earth. The various blessings of Christ's final appearing are here one by one enumerated. That so thou mightest teach me. Cf. 1 Cor. XIII. 12 : "Now we see through a glass darkly ; but then face to face : now I know in part; but then shall 1 know even as also I am known." / loould cause thee to drink of spiced wine. We saw, on IV. 16, that all the various products of the Bride's garden represented the various acts and affections of devotion of the Church to her Lord. Wine, in particular, symbolizes the joint participation of both host and guest in the joys of a feast, and therefore their mutual communion with each other. What the Church here offers to Christ, she has all along been drinking herself. As to the wine being spiced, it will portend, if we recall the symbolical significance of myrrh as the principal ingredient, that the death of Christ lies at the root of all the communion of the Church with him. And this is in fact exactly what is outwardly repre- sented to us in the sacrament of the Lord's Supper. It is of a wine which may be figuratively described as spiced with death, a wine associated with the memory of all our Lord's mortal sufferings, that we there par- take ; and by it we shew forth the Lord's death till he come. All the genuine devotion which our several sacramental acts have represented he will then enable us to present to him in its most perfect form, himself 17—2 260 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VIII. 2. theii drinking of the fruit of the vine new with us in his Father's kingdom (Matt. XXVI. 29). Of the juice of my pomegranate. In other words, " of the richest potion that I can offer thee." The pomegranate seems to have been esteemed the choicest of the fruits from which drinks were made. It is more than once mentioned among the richest products of Canaan, Deut. VIII. 8; Joel 1. 12 ; Haggai ir. 19. Compare, moreover, in the Song, iv. 13 ; vi. 11 ; VII. 12. Eepresentations of it were also introduced, but with what exact symbolism is not clear, on to the hem of the ephod and into the architecture of the temple. In IV. 3, VI. 7, the reference is to the beauty of its hues. His left hand, (fee. See on II. 6. I adjure you, &c. The form of adjuration nearly corresponds to that in n. 7, III. 5, but is shorter. For the explanation of it, see on n. 7. 0/ that ye upstir not, and 0/ that ye disturb not, &c. The T\t2 expresses a more urgent entreaty than the DK of the earlier passages. It is curious that it should be em- ployed in v. 8 in a positive sense, " O ! ", here in a negative sense, " ! not." Such however seems to be plainly the case. Even in English, "O ! will ye upstir " might be an entreaty either to upstir or not to upstir, according to the context. LOVE'S TRIUMPH. vni. 5—12. WITH THE CONCLUSION, vni. 13, 14. Prasparata, ut sponsata, Copuletur Domino. 5 Chorus. Who is this that cometh up from the wil- derness, Leaning upon her beloved? Bride. Under the citron-tree I raised thee up: There thy mother brought thee forth, There she brought thee forth that bare thee. 6 Set me as a seal upon thine heart, As a seal upon thine arm! For love is strong as death; Jealousy is stubborn as the grave: Its flashes are flashes of fire, flame of the Eternal. 7 Floods avail not to quench love, Streams cannot sweep it away: Though a man should for love offer all the wealth of his house, He would be met with utter scorn. 8 We have a little sister, And she hath no breasts : What shall we do for our sister In the dav that she be demanded as a bride? 9 Beloved. Be she wall, we will build for her an en- closure of silver ; Or be she door, we will fasten together for her boards of cedar. 264 THE SONG OF SONGS. 10 Bride. I am a wall, and my breasts are as towers: Therefore am I become in his eyes as one that findeth the favour of peace. 1 1 A vineyard owneth Solomon in Baal-hamon : He hath let out the vineyard unto keepers, That every one should bring for the fruit thereof a thousand pieces of silver. 12 My vineyard, that which is mine own, is before me: Thine be the thousand, Solomon, And two hundred be there for those that keep the fruit. The sixth section of the Song depicts the final union of the Bride and her Beloved. It consists of eight verses, VIII. 5 — 12. Vv. 5 — 7. Who is this that cometli up from the wilderness. Compare on III. 6. That passage described the termination of her first, this the termination of her second long period of waiting. Leaning upon her be- loved. Neither the root p%1 nor any derivative from it occurs elsewhere in the Bible ; but the meaning " to lean" is established by the rendering of the Gieek and Syriac translators and of Jerome, and by the corre- sponding meanings of the root in Arabic. Ginsburg also adduces the Talmudic word pSTl£, "an arm," on which one leans 1 . It is by the supporting, though in- • l It is probable that some transcriber, not understanding the word npDiniD, suggested, in the margin, npJSflD ; and that from the vin. 5.] love's triumph. 265 visible, power of her Beloved that the Bride has been carried through all the trials of her desert-pilgrimage, and therefore it is on him that she is now at the last, in her hour of reward, appropriately represented as leaning. Under the citron-tree I raised thee up. This and the re- mainder of the verse are addressed, as the gender of the Hebrew suffix-pronouns- shews, by the Bride to the Beloved. Commentators who could not read the Song in the original Hebrew have not, of course, always known this. And indeed of recent scholars, some, as Delitzsch and Renan, have wished, by altering the vowel-points, to change the gender of the suffixes. Now the mention of the citron-tree carries us back to II. 3. It there represented that spiritual presence of Christ which the Church of the Old Testament by anticipation enjoyed before his actual coming in the flesh. The import of the imagery is not seriously altered when the shadow of the citron-tree is made to stand generally for the spiritual influence from on high which rested on the Church of God. Under the power of this spiritual influence then, the Church of the Old Testament in due time raised up her divine Redeemer. In the language of the apocalyptic vision, she, the " woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her margin this crept into the text, either superseding flpDinO, as in the Chaldee paraphrase (SHID 'BITl hv fp^ariEl) ; or obliterating the previous ""QIDrrfD, as in the copy used by the LXX. (Ti's avr-q t) avapalvovaa. 'KeXevKavOicr^vrj) ; or else, as in Jerome's copy, finding room for itself without displacing its neighbour (de deserto, deliciis affluens, innixa super, &c). The uncorrupted text has been happily preserved to us in our Masoretic MSS. and by the Syriac version. 266 THE SONG OF SONGS. [VIII. 5. liead a crown of twelve stars," " being with child cried, travailing in birth, and pained to be delivered;" and at length, in her appointed time, "brought forth a man child, who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron" (Rev. xii. 1 — 5). Is it asked how the working of the Divine Spirit, here symbolized by the citron-tree, had directly contributed to this wondrous birth? It is readily answered, that to the Spirit of God must be traced all that system of laws by which the Church of Israel was gradually trained to holiness, and of the true spirit of which, and of the holiness implied in the ob- servance of them, Christ was the crowning and most perfect representative ; again, that to the Spirit of God must be traced all that wondrous typical ceremonial which eventually found in Christ its completion and fulfilment; again, that it was the Spirit of God that rested in an especial manner on those several lines of Israelitish kings and priests and prophets that all cul- minated in the person of the One Great Anointed ; and again, that it was the working of the Spirit that caused so many passages in the earlier history of the Church of Israel to foreshadow the history of him whose way was being thus gradually prepared before him. In all these several ways was the Church of Israel made by the Spirit the means of raising up the long-expected Christ ; who in his turn, by his dutiful and consistent submis- sion to all the ordinances of the Church of Israel, testi- fied that it was from her that he had sprung. There thy mother Drought thee forth, there she brought thee forth that bare thee. The previous clause set forth the eccle- viii. 5.] love's teiumph. 267 siastical, these declare the physical descent of the Saviour of mankind. His mother is here, as in III. 11, the Nation of Israel, as distinguished from the Church of Israel, symbolized by the Bride. It was the Bride, the Church, that raised him up : it was the Mother, the Nation, that brought him forth. And this too, no less than the other, was through the wondrous operation of the Spirit of God. By the Holy Ghost was Christ conceived in the Virgin Mary. It moreover seems probable that in the words in which the angel Gabriel announced to the Virgin what should come to pass, there was a reference to the imagery of the shadow of the citron-tree in the passage of the Song before us: " The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee : therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God" (Luke I. 35). Why else should the angel have made use of this remarkable ex- pression, "overshadow"? But we must pass from this to another question which may here suggest itself. Be it, some will say, that under the citron-tree the Bride had originally raised up her Beloved, be it that under the citron-tree his Mother had born him; why never- theless should the Bride here dwell upon this, now that she is united with him to be parted never more? Clearly, in order to shew how intimately connected with her he was ; and how it was as one thus intimately con- nected with her that he was now finally manifested to her. In other words, he is come for the second time, even as he came at the first, in the flesh ; the glorified, 268 THE SONG OF SONGS. .[VIII. 5. but still the very Son of Man. He appears to the Bride, according to her prayer, as her brother, as one that has sucked the breasts of her mother. He is to her both brother and bridegroom : as such he had pre- viously declared himself (iv. 9), and as such she now, at his re-appearing, welcomes him. Thus all is ex- plained. Set me as a seal upon thine heart, as a seal upon thine arm. The Hebrew word for " seal" " denotes either an impression or a signet-ring. That the latter is here intended is shewn by the parallel passages in Haggai and Jeremiah. The force of the comparison rests upon the inseparableness of a signet-ring from the person, and on the diligent care with which it is guarded. Cf. Jer. xxii. 24 : 'Though Coniah the son of Jehoiakim king of Judah were the signet upon my right hand, &c. :' also Haggai II. 23, where there is perhaps an allusion to our present passage. Signet-rings were worn either, suspended by a string, on the breast (Gen. xxxviii. 18), or else on the hand ; to which customs regard is here had. Instead, however, of the hand, the arm is mentioned, as being the symbol of the active display of succouring might, cf. Psalm lxxxix. 10, lxxvii. 15. The heart here comes under review as the source of love, the arm as the outward manifestation of it" (Hengstcnberg) \ For love is strong as death. Is it of her love to her Beloved, or of her Beloved's to her, that the Bride is here speaking ? We may prepare the way for a reply to this enquiry by observing that a 1 So, nearly, Theodoret : Kapblav /xtv rb deupy^riKbv rrjs '/'ux^s uvo/xd- oas, fipaxlova Si rb TrpaKTLKbv. vm. 6.] love's triumph. 269 corresponding question may be asked in reference to a simpler portion of Holy Scripture, Rom. VIII. 35. Is the love of Christ in that passage our love to him, or his to us ? The former is the general view of the ancient, the latter of the modern interpreters. But, in fact, both are in a measure right ; and neither his love to us nor ours to him can be excluded. For while fully acknow- ledging that his love to us takes precedence of ours to him, and that we thus love him because he first loved us, we must yet remember that it is love's greatest glory and reward to draw forth a corresponding affection from him towards whom it is directed, and to propagate itself by enworking its own echo wheresoever it strikes. We may call that the perfection of love, when two hearts beat in such entire unison the one with the other as to reciprocate in all fulness each other's attachment. And in such a case either of the two parties, in speaking of the love that reigns between them, does not define, for there can be no object in defining, whether it be his own or the other's love that he intends : the two have practically become as one. So is it in the striking and beautiful description before us. By love being as strong as death is primarily meant that love will not more easily part with its object than death with its victim. More than this is not here directly asserted. But in proportion as it was felt that there was a power which was mightier than death, while it made no war upon love, (and the death and resurrection of Christ were the manifestation of the existence of such a power,) so was it also necessarily recognized that in the universe 270 THE SONG OF SONGS. [vill. 6. Love reigns supreme. Jealousy is stubborn as the grave, lit. "as hades." By jealousy is here denoted that resolute and devoted attachment which will not suffer its object to be torn from its grasp. Such attachment is as unyield- ing, as relentlessly tenacious, as is hades in respect of its prey. Our English Version here gives "jealousy is cruel as the grave;" and since the relentlessness of the latter constitutes its cruelty, the term "cruel" may perhaps be metaphorically allowed to express also, with quaint force, the relentlessness of the former. There is, in the He- brew, an elegant alliteration between the three words of this clause. Its flashes are flashes of fire. For "flashes," our English Version gives "coals." But the Hebrew term is used also of the sudden springings of the arrow from the bowstring, Psalm lxxvi. 3, and of the strokes of pestilential disease, Deut. xxxn. 24; and the force of the present clause is lost if the word be rendered in English by a particular instead of by a general term. The likeness of love to fire is here asserted, not as- sumed. That likeness consists, first, in its impetuous energy, and secondly, and still more importantly, in its uncontrollable power. Flame of the Eternal. In He- brew, Shalhebethjah, JTrflPn^, a compound word, formed, no doubt, by the poet for the occasion. It is well known that in the eleventh century the Palestinian and Babylonian editors of the Hebrew Bible, Ben Asher and Ben Naphtali, the other discrepancies of whose respective copies related solely to the HebrcAv vowels and accents, were at issue in reference to this one word, as to whether its two parts should be kept viii. 6.] love's tjbiumph. 271 together or should be separated by a hyphen. Doubtless they should be kept as closely as possible together, the word following the analogy of )Tv5X£ in Jer. II. 31. No parallelism is gained by dividing the word into two, for " Jab," the most sacred name of God, would hardly be used as parallel to " fire": much force is at the same time lost by destroying the unusual appearance which the word, undivided, presents 1 . What now is its true meaning? That the earlier element in it, though of disputed etymology, signifies " flames," is by all ad- mitted. As to the latter element, " Jah," it seems clear that the phrase "of God" is constantly used in Hebrew to distinguish that which is excellent of its kind : thus Psalm XXXVI. 6, "mountains of God," i.e. "great mountains;" lxxx. 10, "cedars of God," i.e. "goodly cedars;" Jonah III. 3, "a great city to God," i.e. "an exceedingly great city:" cf. also Acts VII. 20, do-reicx; too @e&3, "fair to God," i.e. "exceeding fair." And in Gen. xiii. 10, " the garden of the Lord," even the name Jehovah seems to be simikirly employed. We can hardly altogether separate the interpretation of the term before us from the interpretation of such phrases as these ; though on the other hand, as Jah is the con- centrated and most emphatic form of the sacred name Jehovah, it may well be that the "flames of Jah" will bear a somewhat higher meaning than "flames of God." 1 To the genuineness of the word, and also to its unity, testimony not open to suspicion is borne by the LXX, who render it «e;oo- THE STORY OF A BOULDER; OR, GLEANINGS BY A FIELD GEOLOGIST. By ARCHIBALD GEIKIE. Illustrated. Fcp. 8vo. cloth, 5s. ' We do not know a more readable book on a scientific subject, and it will be invaluable to young people, as well as interesting to those who are already acquainted with the subject it treats of.'— Clerical Journal. -o-oja^oo- LIFE AND CORRESPONDENCE OF M. DE TOCQUEVILLE. Translated from the French. By the Translator of ' Napoleon Correspondence with King Joseph.' With numerous additions. 2 vols, crown 8vo. 21s. 'The appearance of this work will be welcomed by every politician and every Englishman capable of appreciating exhaustive and solid thought.' — Spectator. 'Few men of the nineteenth century have attained a more remarkable influence. . . . Charming as specimens of style, they are of infinitely greater value as showing the inner life of a man who was as simple as a child, and yet as gifted as any of the many learned writers and scholars whom Trance has produced.'— Bell's Messenger. -o-o - ,33cjr>o- PICTURES OF OLD ENGLAND. By Dr. REINHOLD PAULI. Translated, with the author's revision, by E. C. Otte. With a Map of London in the Thirteenth Century. Crown 8vo. extra cloth, 8s. 6d. CONTENTS: I. CANTERBURY AND THE WORSHIP OF ST. THOMAS X BECKET. II. MONKS AND MENDICANT FRIARS. III. PARLIAMENT IN THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY. IV. ENGLAND'S EARLIEST RELATIONS TO AUSTRIA AND PRUSSIA. V. THE EMPEROR LOUIS IV. AND KING EDWARD III. VI. THE HANSEATIC STEEL YARD IN LONDON. VII. TWO POETS, GOWER AND CHAUCER. VIII. JOHN WICLIF. ' There are some books so admirable, that merely general criticism subsides into "Bead, it wUt satisfy you." Dr. l'uuli's work is ol'tliis kind. — Nonconformist. GARIBALDI AT CAPRERA. By COLOXEL VECCHJ. With Preface by Mrs. Gaskell. aud a View of Canten Pep. - h. ss. ad. • Afrer all has ten told, there was something wanting to the full and true hMnria of the I - rand mode of life; as e ... narration will « ...... tutl and minute account may be relied upon : and it has an air of truth that coinniv. when it ■ most extravagant in its admiration. "— Nonconformist. -»o>*ic ROME IX 1860. By EDWARD DICEY, author of ' Lifo of Cavour. - Crown 8m cioth. ds. 6d. "So Iblaiaaj :uid apparently so faithful a portrait. It is the Koine of rr• THE ITALIAN WAR OF 1848-9, Ami the last Italian Poet. By the late HENRY LUSHINGTON, Chief Secre- tary to the Government of Malta. With a Biographical Preface by G. STOYIM VBHAfiKBS. Crown Svo. cloth. 68. fid. "Perhaps the most difficult of all literary tasks—the task of Erring hillciliral nnitv. and interest to event* 90 recent as to be still encumbered with all t. • . w's- papers invest them— has never been more successfully discharged. . . Mr. Lushington very short compass i - :he true nature tads _ story 01 the struggle and defeat of lta".\ a debtee od dramatic interest which not one newspaper reader iu teu thousand ever supposed it to possess.'— Sai ;.u Review. "*ot^*o°" EARLY EGYPTIAN HISTORY. FOR THE YOUNG. WITH DESCRIPTIONS OF THE TOMBS AND MONUMENTS. By the Author of ' Sidney Grey,' to. and her Sister. Foil Sro. clot' - ■ Full of Information wi th Wi t be i ng dull, and Ml of humour with i statin* in the most popular form the main results of modern res to take our readers to the book its they will lean more of Ancient Egypt than in any other popular work on the subject.'— I.omvn Kxruw. -o-olvic o- DAYS OF OLD; OR, STORIES FROM OLD ENGLISH HISTORY. FOB THE YOUNG. By the Author of ' Ruth and Her Friends.' 'With a Frontispiece by W. H.m m is Hi n v. Royal USmo. beautifully printed on toned rctpor and bound in cloth, os. • A delightful little hook, full of interest and instruction. . . fine feeling, dramatic < and descriptive power in the stories. . . They are valuable as noon English history, bringing rapidly out the maimers and customs • ial and poli conditions oi our Britis . \ ~.\ cestors, ;uid die moral always oi a pure and noble kiud.'— Litkkaky Ijiuni. HOW TO WIN OUR WORKERS. A Short Account of the Leeds Sewing School for Factory Girls. By Mrs. HYDE. Dedicated by permission to the Eael of Caelisle. Fcp. 8vo. limp cloth. Is. 6d. This work is intended to exhibit the successful working of an Institution for bringing the Working-girls of a large town into communication and sympathy with those who are separated from them by social position. ' A little book brimful of good sense and good feeling.'— Globe. OUR YEAR. Child's Book in Prose and Rhyme. By the author of ' John Halifax.' With numerous Illustrations by Ciabekce Dobell. Royal 16mo. cloth, gilt leaves, 5s. 'Just the book we could wish to see in the hands of every child.'— English Churchman. LITTLE ESTELLA, J^JsTlD OTHEIR E^HR^ST TALES. By MAY BEVERLEY. With Frontispiece. Royal 16mo. cloth, gilt leaves, 5s. ' Very pretty, pure iu conception, and simply, gracefully related . . . genuine story-telling. ' Daily News. MY FIRST JOURNAL. A Book for Children. By GEORGIANA M. CRAIK, author of ' Lost and Won.' With Frontispiece. Royal 16mo. cloth, gilt leaves, 4s. 6d. ' True to Nature and to a fine kind of nature. . . . The style is simple and graceful a work of Art, clever and healthy-toned.'— Globe. AGNES HOPETOUN'S SCHOOLS AND HOLIDAYS. By Mrs. OLIPHANT, author of ' Margaret Maitland.' With Frontispiece Royal 16mo. cloth, gilt leaves, 5s. 'Described with exquisite reality . . . teaching the young pure and good lessons.' John Bull. 8 DAYS OF OLD: STORIES FROM OLD ENGLISH HISTORY. By the author of ' Ruth and Her Friends.' With Frontispiece. Royal 16mo cloth, gilt leaves, 5s. 'A delightful little book, full of interest and instruction . . fine feeling, dramatic weight, and descriptive power in the stories.'— Literary Gazette. DAVID, KING OF ISRAEL. A History for the Young. By JOSIAH WRIGHT, Head Master of Sutton Coldfield Grammar School. With Illustrations. Royal ltjino. cloth, gilt leaves, 5s. 'An excellent book . . well conceived, and well worked out.'— Literary Chorchman. RUTH AND HER FRIENDS. •Is. With Frontispiece. Third Edition. R05 leaves, 5s. ' A book which girls will read with avidity, and cannot fail to profit by.' Literary Chorchman. A Story for Girls. With Frontispiece. Third Edition. Royal 16mo. cloth, gilt leaves, 5s. SECOND EDITION. GEORGE BRIMLEY'S ESSAYS. Edited by WILLIAM GEORGE CLARK, M.A. Public Orator in the University of Cambridge. With Portrait. Crown, 8vo. cloth, 5s. CONTENTS: I. TENNYSON'S POEMS. II. WORDSWORTH'S POEMS. III. POETRY AND CRITICISM. IV. ANGEL IN THE HOUSE. V. CARLYLE'S LIFE OF STERLING. VI. ESMOND. VII. MY NOVEL. VIII. BLEAK HOUSE. IX. WESTWARD HO ! X. WILSON'S NOCTES. XI COMTE'S POSITIVE PHILOSOPHY. •One of the most delightful and precious volumes of criticism that has appeared in these days . To every cultivated reader they will disclose the wonderful clearness of perception, the del cacv of feeling, the pure taste, and the remarkably firm and decisive judgment which are the characteristics of all Mr. Briinley's writings on subjects that really penetrated and fully possessed his nature.'— Nonconformist. MEMOIR OF THE LIFE OF THE REV. ROBERT STORY LATE ^NISTEB OF BOSNEATH, DUMBAET0NSHIEE. By ROBERT HERBERT STORY, Minister of Rosneath. Crown 8vo. cloth, with Portrait, 7s. 6(1. %* This volume includes several important passages of Scottish Religious and Ecclesiastical History during the Second Quarter of the present Century. Among others, the Row Conteoveesy, the Rise of the Ievingite Move- ment, the Eaely Histoey of the Feee Chuech, &c. &c. THE PRISON CHAPLAIN: A MEMOIR OF THE REV. JOHN CLAY, LATE chaplain of peeston gaol. With selections from his Correspondence and a Sketch of Prison Discipline in England. By his SON. "With Portrait, 8vo. cloth, 15s. 'It presents a vigorous account of the Penal system in England in past times, and in our °^P- • • It exhibits in detail the career of one of our latest prison Ireformers; alleged, we believe with truth, to have been one of the most successful, and certainly in his judgments and opinions one of the most cautious and reasonable, as well as one of the most ardent.' Saturday Review. MEMOIR OF GEORGE WAGNER LATE INCUMBENT OF ST. STEPHEN'S, BEIGHTON. By JOHN NASSAU SIMPKINSON, M.A. Rector of Brington, Northampton. Third and cheaper Edition. Fcp. 8vo. 5s. 'A more edifying biography we have rarely met with ... If any parish priest, discouraged by what he may consider an unpromising aspect of the time, should be losing heart . . . we recommend him to procure this edifying memoir, to study it well, to set the example of the holy man who is the subject of it before him in all its length and breadth, and then he will appreciate what can be done even by one earnest man ; and gathering fresh inspiration, he will chide himself for all previous discontent, and address himself with stronger purpose than ever to the lowly works and lofty aims of the ministry entrusted to his charge.' Literary Churchman. FAMILY PRAYERS. By the Rev. GEORGE BUTLER, M.A. Vice-Principal of Cheltenham College and late Fellow of Exeter College, Oxford. Crown 8vo. cloth, 5s. 12 CAMBRIDGE CLASS BOOKS FOE OOLLZEG-ES -A-HXriD SCHOOLS PUBLISHED BY MACMILLAN & CO. A set of Macmillan $ Co.'s Class Books will be found in the Educational Department (Class 29) of the International Exhibition, and for which a Medal has been awarded. Arithmetic. For the use of Schools. By Baenaed Smith, M.A., Fellow of St. Peter's College, Cambridge. New Edition. Crown 8vo. cloth, 4s. 6d. A Key to the Arithmetic for Schools. By Baenaed Smith, M.A., Fellow of St. Peter's College, Cambridge. Second Edition, Crown 8vo. cloth, 8s. 6d. Arithmetic and Algebra, in their Principles and Ap- plication : with numerous systematically arranged Examples, taken from the Cambridge Examination Papers. By Baenaed Smith, M.A. Fellow of St. Peter's College, Cambridge. Eighth Edition. Crown 8vo. cloth, 10s. 6d. Exercises in Arithmetic. By Baenaed Smith. With Answers. Crown Svo. limp cloth, 2s. 6d. Or sold separately, as follows : — Part 1. Is. Part II. Is. Answers 6d. An Elementary Treatise on the Theory of Equations, with a Collection of Examples. By I. Todhuntee, M.A. Fellow and Mathe- matical Lecturer of St. John's College, Cambridge. Crown Svo. cloth, 7s. 6d. Euclid. For Colleges and Schools. By I. Todhuntee, M.A., Fellow and Principal Mathematical Lecturer of St. John's College, Cambridge. Pot 8vo. [In the Press. Algebra. For the use of Colleges and Schools. By I. Todhuntee, M.A. Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. Second Edition. Crown 8vo. cloth, 7s. 6d. . Plane Trigonometry. For Colleges and Schools. By I. Todhuntee, M.A. Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. Second Edition. Crown Svo. cloth, 5s. A Treatise on Spherical Trigonometry. For the use of Colleges and Schools. By I. Todhuntee, M.A. Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. Crown Svo. cloth, 4s. 6d. Examples of Analytical Geometry of Three Dimensions. By I. Todhuntee, M.A. Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. Crown Svo. cloth, 4s. A Treatise on the Differential Calculus. With nume- rous Examples. By I. Todhuntee, M.A. Fellow and Assistant Tutor of St. John's College, Cambridge. Third Edition. Crown Svo. cloth, 10s. 6d. 13 A Treatise on the Integral Calculus. With numerous Examples. By I. Todhunteb, M.A. Fellow and Assistant Tutor of St. John's College, Cambridge. Second Edition. Crown 8vo. cloth, 10s. 6tL A Treatise on Analytical Statics. With numerous Examples. By I. Todhunter, M.A. Fellow of St. John's College, Cambridge. Second Edition. Crown 8vo. cloth, 10s. 6d. First Book of Algebra. For Schools. By J. C. W. Ellis, M.A., and P. M. Clabk, M.A. Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. [Preparing. Arithmetic in Theory and Practice. For Advanced Pupils. By J. Brook Smith, M.A. Part First. 161 pp. (1860). Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. A Short Manual of Arithmetic. By C. W. Underwood, M.A. 96 pp. (1860). Fcp. 8vo. 2s. 6d. Introduction to Plane Trigonometry. For the use of Schools. By J. C. Snowball, M.A. Second Edition (1847). 8vo. 5s. Plane and Spherical Trigonometry. With the Con- struction and Use of Tables of Logarithms. By J. C. Snowball, M.A. Ninth Edition, 210 pp. (1857). Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Plane Trigonometry. With a numerous Collection of Examples. By R. D. Beasley, M.A. 106 pp. (1S58). Crown 8vo. 3s. 6d. Elementary Treatise on Mechanics. With a Collection of Examples. By S. Parkinson, B.D. Second Edition, 345 pp. (1860). Crown 8vo. 9s. 6d. A Treatise on Optics. By S. Parkinson, B.D. 304 pp. (1859). Crown Svo. 10s. 6d. Elementary Hydrostatics. With numerous Examples and Solutions. By J. B. Pheab, M.A. Second Edition. 156 pp. (1857). Crown Svo. 5s. 6d. Dynamics of a Particle. With numerous Examples. By P. G. Tait, M.A. and W. J. Steele, M.A. 304 pp. (1856). Crown 8vo. 10s. 6d. A Treatise on Dynamics. By W. P. Wilson, M.A. 176 pp. (1850). Svo. 9s. 6d. Dynamics of a System of Rigid Bodies. With nume- rous Examples. By E. J. Routh, M.A. 336 ppl (1860). Crown Svo. 10s. 6d. 14 Geometrical Treatise on Conic Sections. With a Col- lection of Examples. By W. H. Dbew, M.A. 121 pp. (Second Edition, 1862). 4s. 6d. Solutions to Problems contained in a Geometrical Treatise on Conic Sections. By "W. H. Deew, M.A. (1862). 4s. 6d. Elementary Treatise on Conic Sections and Algebraic Geometry. By G. H. Pucexe, M.A. Second Edition. 264 pp. (1856). Crown Svo. 7s. 6d. Elementary Treatise on Trilinear Co-ordinates. By N. M. Feeeees, M.A. 154 pp. (1861). Crown 8vo. 6s. 6d. A Treatise on Solid Geometry. By P. Frost, M.A. and J. Wolstenholme, M.A. 8vo. [In the Press. A Treatise on the Calculus of Finite Differences. By Geoege Boole, D.C.L. 248 pp. (1840). Crown 8vo. 10s. 6d. The Algebraical and Numerical Theory of Errors of Observations and the Combination of Observations. By the Astronomer Royal, G. B. Aiex, M.A. Pp. 103 (1861). 6s. 6d. The Construction of Wrought Iron Bridges, em- bracing the Practical Application of the Principles of Mechanics to Wrought Iron Girder Work. By J. H. Latham, M.A. CE. With numerous plates. Pp. 282 (1858). 15s. Mathematical Tracts. On the Lunar and Planetary Theories, the Figure of the Earth, Precession and Nutation, the Calculus of Variations, and the Undulatory Theory of Optics. By the Astronomer- Royal, G. B. Aiet, M.A. Fourth Edition (185S), pp. 400. 15s. An Elementary Treatise on the Planetary Theory. By C. H.H Chetne,B.A. Scholar of St. John's College, Cambridge. [.Preparing. A Treatise on Attractions, Laplace's Functions, and the Figure of the Earth. By J. H. Pbatt, M.A. Second Edition. Crown 8vo. 126 pp. (1861). 6s. 6d. An Elementary Treatise on Quaternions. By P. Gr. Tait, M.A., Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Edinburgh. [Preparing. Singular Properties of the Ellipsoid, and Associated Surfaces of the Ninth Degree. By the Rev. G. F. Childe, M.A. Mathe- matical Professor in the South African College. 8vo. 10s. 6d. Collection of Mathematical Problems and Examples With Answers. By H. A. Morgan, MA. Pp. 190 (1858). Crown 8vo. 6s. 6d. 15 Senate-House Mathematical Problems. With Solutions 1848-51. By Ferrers and Jackson. 8vo. 15s. 6d. 1848-51. (Riders.) By Jameson. 8vo. 7s. 6d. 1854. By Waxton and Mackenzie. 8vo. 10s. 6d. 1857. By Campion and Walton. 8vo. 8s. 6d. 1860. By Routh and Watson. Crown 8vo. 7s. 6d. Hellenica: a First Greek Reading-Book. Being a History of Greece, taken from Diodorus and Thncydides. By Josiah Weight, M.A. Second Edition. Pp. 150 (1857). Pep. 8vo. 3s. 6d. Demosthenes on the Crown. With English Notes. By B. Drake, M.A. Second Edition, to which is prefixed iEschines against Ctesiphon. With English Notes. (1860.) Pep. 8vo. 5s. Juvenal. For Schools. With English Notes and an Index. By John E. Mayor, M.A. Pp. 464 (1853). Crown 8vo. 10s. 6d. Cicero's Second Philippic. With English Notes. By John E. B. Mayor. Pp. 168 (1861). 5s. Help to Latin Grammar ; or, the Form and Use of Words in Latin. With Progressive Exercises. By Josiah Wright, M.A- Pp. 175 (1855). Crown 8vo. 4s. 6d. The Seven Kings of Kome. A First Latin Reading- Book. By Josiah Weight, M.A. Second Edit. Pp. 138 (1857). Fcp. 8vo. 3s. Vocabulary and Exercises on ' The Seven Kings.' By Josiah Wright, M.A. Pp. 94(1857). Pep. 8vo. 2s. 6d. First Latin Construing Book. By E. Thring, M.A. Pp. 104 (1855). Pep. 8vo. 2s. 6d. Sallust. — Catilina et Jugurtha. With English Notes. For Schools. By Charles Merivale, B.D. Second Edition. Pp. 17i' (1858). Fcp. 8vo. 4s. 6d. Catilina and Jugurtha may be had separately, price 2s. 6d. each. yEschylus. — The Eumenides. With English Notes and Translation. By B. Drake, M.A. Pp. 144 (1853). 8vo. 7s. 6d. St. Paul's Epistle to the Romans. With Notes. By Chakxes John Vaughan, D.D. (1861). Crown 8vo. 5s. The Child's English Grammar. By E. Thring, M.A. Demy 18mo. New Edition (1857). Is. Elements of Grammar taught in English. By E. Thring, M.A. Third Edition. Pp. 136 (1860). Demy 18mo. 2s. SPOTTISWOODE AND CO., PRINTERS, NEW-STREET SQUARE. LONDON BS1485 .T531 The song of songs : a revised Princeton Theological Seminary-Speer Library 1 1012 00052 6592 DATE DUE *«■ p**, wt - m& m Demco. Inc. 38-293