THE GRADUATED SERIES OF READING-BOOK Xow ready, Book the Third, price 2s. and Book the Fourth, price 2s. 6d. being the first and second in order of publication, A GRADUATED SERIES OF FIVE READING-LESSON BOOKS, Adapted, as a Progressive Course of Reading, for all Classes of English Schools and Families. In course of publication, as follows : — First Book, about 200 pages Second Book, about 256 pages ( in the press) Third Book, 312 pages (note ready) 2 Fourth Book, 440 pages (Just published) 2 Fifth Book, about 500 pages 3 9 . 1 1 T HIS is an entirely of English Reading Books; in which the difficulty of tire exercises is graduated chiefly if. 0 0, 0 6 0 knowledge of the proficiency lie has acquired in the other four ; and it will aim at answering the *'**'-' V.AWV.IUV.O JO ^lauuatcu UUXCM1J practical purposes of a Class-Book with reference to the mental ea- I of English Literature. The Third pacity requisite to comprehend I and Fourth Books are now ready. Tito 1 — * l -~ : - c ■ L -‘- - Second Book is in the press; and tlio Series will be completed in FIVE VOLUMES, price 10*. as •>bove, in the course of the prose: yen •EBSf i in ele- and grasp the informatioa con roved ; and dso, as far as posable, with reference to the peculiarities of grammatical construction. The object of the S' lies is no* 1 ess to facilitate the acquisition of the ip NS* 0 i tht ®hrnln S i ra/ ^ PRINCETON. N J. 2 s 131 . M6 1861 Th^?' George , 1803-1880. The lost tribes and the Saxons of the East and the THE «nrr LOST TRIBES &c. &c. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2016 / https://archive.org/details/losttribessaxons00moor_0 LOST TRIBES AND THE SAXONS OF THE EAST AND OF THE WEST, WITH NEW VIEWS OF BUDDHISM, AND translations of Jlork-gccorbs in gnMa. BY GEORGE MOORE, M.D., MEMBER OF THE BOYAL COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS, LONDON, ETC. Not dull or barren are the winding ways Of hoar antiquity ; but strewn with flowers. Babton. LONDON : LONGMAN, GREEN, LONGMAN, AND ROBERTS. MDCCCLXI. [The right of translation is reserved.] “ Those wild tribes [ the Gothic } were bringing with them into the magic circle of the Western Church's influence the very materials which she re- quired for the building up of a future Christendom. The new invaders divided Europe among themselves '' — Charles Kingsley. PREFACE. The inquiry pursued in this, volume was undertaken as an occasional diversion from the pressure of severer demands upon the mind, and formed only an inci- dental part of a larger investigation concerning the ethnology of the East. Though the several subjects considered in this inquiry may for the most part be unpromising to the multitude of readers who make a pastime of books, and to interest whom would re- quire a very different treatment, yet it is hoped that the appearance of this work before the public will be justified by proving worthy of the attention of those numerous intelligent persons who look for meaning in the distribution of mankind. 1 have thankfully to acknowledge the kindness of Mr. Norris, through whom I have been permitted to copy and to publish anything contained in the publi- cations of the Koyal Asiatic Society. In recording kindness, I cannot but mingle deep regret with sin- cere gratitude in recalling the great obligation I am under to the late very learned Professor of Sanscrit at Oxford, H. H. Wilson, who first directed my atten- tion to Buddhism, and indicated the books best suited IV PREFACE. to assist my inquiry. I have infringed upon a right in copying an engraving from a work by Lieut. -Colonel Cunningham, on “ The Bliilsa Topes,” but I believe he will forgive the liberty in consideration of the fact that I would have sought his permission, but found he was engaged in his important duties in India. He will not be displeased if this volume in any degree promote the fuller knowledge of those interesting antiquities which he has so admirably laboured to discover and elucidate. I would only add that, should it be my privilege to have readers capable of correcting any errors- con- cerning matters of fact referred to in this volume, or of throwing any light on the inquiry itself, I shall be thankful to receive any communication to that effect. Since the completion of this work, I have dis- covered a Hebraic inscription, which, graven in ancient Pali characters, stands mysteriously manifest on the wall of a rock-temple in Kanari, about twenty miles from Bombay. As this remarkable record may afford a clue to the meaning of certain obscure pas sages in other inscriptions given in the latter chapters of this work, a literal translation may be properly admitted in this place, the full vindication of the rendering being reserved for a more convenient occasion. Hitherto the original seems to have remained without any attempt at interpretation. A PREFACE. V fac-simile, taken by James Bird, Esq., Secretary of the Bombay Asiatic Society, will be found in his interesting volume entitled “ Historical Researches on the Origin and Principles of the Bauddha and Jaina Religions.”* * * § The numbers merely indicate the lines of the original. (1) The soft flowing f of the winepress from the white gushing fruit is as that which sets me at rest ; my drink, the refining of the fruit, (2) is the very grace of his mouth. Behold what thou possessest, yea, even the glad- someness in it that is ministered to thee. (3) Lo, the worship [or blood] of Sale a is the fruit of my lip; his garden [paradise] which Cyrus laid low was glowing red; behold it is blackened. (4) His people being aroused would have their rights, for they were cast down at the cry of the parting of Dan, (5) who being delivered was perfectly free. . . every one grew mighty ; your religion had saved (6) even him from uncleanness. And his \_Saka' s] mouth, enkindling them, brought the Serim, J together from the race of Harari.§ (7) My mouth also hastened the rupture, and as one obeying my hand thou didst sing praise. 0 unclean one, his reli- gious decree is his bow. (8) He who complains of the presence of the inflicted equality turns aside. My gift is freedom to him who is fettered, the freedom of the polluted is penitence. (9) As to Dan his unloosing was destruction, oppression and strife; he stoutly turned away, he departed twice. (10) The predetermined thought is a hand prepared. The re- deemed of Kasha wandered about like the [flock] over driven. (11) The prepared was the ready, yea, Gotha, that watched for the presence of Dam., afforded concealment to the exile whose vexations became his triumphs ; and Saka also, being reinvigorated by the Calamity, purified the East, the vices of which he branded. * Plate 44. 14. f Rakak — rakt, applied to the refining of wine, &c. Letters, as if by another hand, stand above, in the original, which give the sense of perfect emptiness of fruit. + Serim — Seres (free, or princes [?]). A people called Seres have been the cause of much doubtful discussion. See Latham’s Ethnological Essays. § People of the hill-country of Ephraim are so called — 2 Sam. xxiii. 11, 33, VI PREFACE. Assuming the correctness of this rendering, it pre- sents a singular and most suggestive corroboration of the conclusions arrived at in this volume, as to the connexion and origin of the Danes, the Goths, and the Saxons ; since we here find a people or tribe named Dan distinctly associated with the Goths and the people of Saka, while Cyrus, who can only be the well-known king of Persia, is poetically referred to as the desolator of the teacher of Buddhism, Saka, who was certainly the same as Godama , the king of Kasha; and therefore it may not unfairly be inferred that the destruction of Kasha, mentioned in other inscriptions "n this volume, was caused by Cyrus, whose con- quests extended over Northern India, as well as Bactria and the country of the Massagetas, amongst whom, as Herodotus relates, he met his death. In considering the relation of the tribe of Dan with the Goths, whom I have endeavoured to identify with the Gittites (p. 149, n.), it may be interesting to re- member that in the distribution of the Israelitish tribes that of Dan embraced the country of the Gittites or people of Gath. G. M. Hastings : Dec. 15, 1860. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION. PAM THE HEBREW BOOK AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE . . . 1 CHAPTER I. EZEKIEL’S TISION — THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD . . .17 CHAPTER II. Israel’s perversion, warning, and recovery . . 47 CHAPTER III. HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO ? 67 CHAPTER IY. THE HEBREW INFLUENCE AND THE SAXON RACE . . 80 CHAPTER Y. Israel’s new names 105 CHAPTER VI. CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES 123 CHAPTER VII. THE ATGHANS AND THEIR AEFINITIES .... 143 CHAPTER VIII. THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI 161 Vlll CONTENTS, CHAPTER IX. TXQB THE DOCTBINES OE SAKYA-BUDDHA 180 CHAPTER X. BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS : THEIR OBIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE . 206 CHAPTER XI. BUDDHISTIC CAYES AND INSCBIPTIONS .... 227 CHAPTER XII. THE INSCBIPTIONS AT GIBNAB AND DELHI .... 265 CHAPTER XIII. SEPULCHBAL INSCBIPTIONS IN AEIAN CHAEACTEBS . . 28S CHAPTER XIY. INSCBIPTIONS FOUND AT DELHI 301 CHAPTER XV. THE INSCBIPTION ON FEBOZ’s PILLAB .... 320 CHAPTER XVI. THE BELATION OF THE INSCBIPTIONS TO PEOPHEOY . . 332 CHAPTER XVII. THE SAXON DEBITATION AND DESTINY .... 349 CHAPTER XVIII. THE KABENS AND THEIB TEADITIONS 359 APPENDIX . 381 INDEX ... 409 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Plate of Coins to face page 156 A Bas-belief at Sanchi 171 Illustrations fbom a Buddhist Medal 196 Symbols from Bas-reliefs 215 Alphabets ..... 232 Inscriptions from “ Joonur” 233 Illustrations from Caye-temple at “Joonur” 243 Inscription from Bybath 251 Fac-simile of the Girnar Inscription 269 Sepulchral Inscriptions and Coins from Jelalabad and Manikyala 293 Delhi Inscriptions North Compartment 303 West Compartment 306 South Compartment 309 East Compartment 312 THE LOST TEIBES AND THE SAXONS OF THE EAST AND OE THE WEST. INTRODUCTION. THE HEBREW BOOK AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE. The history of the world predicts the consummation of all history in a higher standing of our common humanity. The darkness of the past is to become the enlightenment of the future. Hence with every prophecy, of good or of evil, we find a picture of the moral condition on which that prophecy is grounded; and the general upshot of all foreseeing is a vision that reveals the dominion of knowledge over ignorance, and of light over darkness. There are, however, specific predictions in that marvellous Book on which Christians found their faith, and the fulfilment of such predictions has hitherto sustained the authority of that Book, not only as a record, but as a means of throwing light into the dark passages of current history, onwards to the end. It is with a feeling that the truth of that Book wiE, in some slight degree, he elucidated by this volume, that the attention of the general reader is solicited to the subject of it, which, though interesting in itself to in- B 2 INTRODUCTION. quisitive minds, is doubly so to Biblical students. The Bible first gave Englishmen an interest in the East, and now by its demands upon their hearts, binds them to concern themselves about all that is transpiring there. But to understand the present, it is necessary to see its connexion with the past and the future. A portentous cloud has long hung over all that is Oriental, and that cloud spreads, with the elements of a terrible conflict in its bosom. A mighty, and perhaps final struggle is coming amongst the leading tribes of men in defence of their traditional creeds and superstitions, against the faiths that are based upon positive intelligence, the knowledge of what the Divine Mind has actually done, and is doing. The religions that are respectively symbolized by the Lotus, the Crescent, and the Cross, are energising their votaries afresh. The Crescent, the emblem of a dimly reflected and changeful light, symbolises the religion inculcated by the sword-bearer, Mahomet. It comes between the highest form of traditional heathenism, that feeling after God, whose purest em- blem is the water-born Lotus, and the Cross, which is the sign of the divine self-sacrifice that destroys sin and death. To the Crescent, as partaking of the ignorant presumption of a deistic paganism with its lunar archaism, belonged the power of beating down idolatry; but it also held sword to sword against that form of the Cross which was borne as a banner before such Christian conquerors as Constantine and THE HEBREW BOOK AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE. 3 Charlemagne. When such conquerors cease, when Greek Church and Roman Church, East and West, find no defence in emperors with great guns and plausibilities, the Crescent will wane into the morning starlight of a better promise, and Turks and Arabs will listen to the Word that speaks of eternal peace. If Christian nations, so called, wield the sword with greater force than other nations, it is not because their power is in armaments alone, but because there is an energy belonging to their belief which enables them to discern where all strength lies, and which, while conferring validity on their social and civil or- ganizations, inspires them with an irrepressible love of general intelligence and freedom. The idea represented by the Cross is divine, and therefore gives a sense of authority to those who receive and obey it. As a faith pertaining to the individual, it subdues the man ; as a faith only so far received as to modify the theory of government and policy, it tends to render a nation determined and ready to subjugate other people to its own laws. Commer- cially speaking, the Cross represents the Hebrew element as well as the Christian, and so it would conquer only to tax and supply trade, but, religiously speaking, the Cross represents the missionary spirit. In both respects the Cross is necessarily aggressive. It converts the peoples that have no previous religious literature, no Koran, no Shasters, no Yedas, but it wars with those that have. Mere idolaters are to bow down to the physical power and scientific skill b 2 4 INTRODUCTION. possessed, as a matter of course, by the nations that worship the Author of law and creation ; but those who are spiritually ruled by a written creed which assumes a divine authority will oppose Christianity or the Cross with the obstinacy of mental conviction. Hence the difficulty of dealing with the people sym- bolized by the Crescent and the Lotus. As the Crescent took the sword, it will perish by the sword. But the Lotus represents another principle, which logically brings it into contact with Christianity as a rival appealing to the minds of men on the grounds of conscience and truth. A quarter of mankind are Buddhists, of whom the Lotus is the symbol. It will probably assist us to understand the relations of Buddhism to the earlier states of society and to other creeds, if we trace the origin of that symbol. In the first place, we find that the Lotus was a sacred symbol with the ancient Egyptians, and thus this beautiful symbol, like very much of the mythology of India, connects it with Egypt; a circumstance, ethno- logically considered, of much interest and importance. The Lotus, as a sacred symbol, assumes this conven- tional form amongst the hieroglyphics. The normal number of the petals of the lotus is twelve. Here we see six of them in profile, divided by the calyx into threes, thus presenting a triple triplet; which, in- terpreted Buddhistically, as well as after the manner of the Egyptians, would probably signify perfect potentiality, that is to say, existence sustained by THE HEBREW BOOK AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE. 5 Omnipotence.* Now, it is interesting to observe that from a very early period the Israelites used the symbol of the lily. It may be disputed whether the lily introduced by Solomon amongst the sacred sym- bols of the temple was the lotus (1 Kings vii. 26); but there is reason to think that it was, and that it was the accepted symbol representing the twelve tribes of Israel. If so, it had probably been their symbol from the time of their sojourn in Egypt, where Moses acquired that learning, so much of which appears in his writings. That the common lily of Palestine might afterwards supersede it is likely, be- cause the lotus was not there indigenous. The lotus, however, might well symbolise the tribes by the twelve overlapping petal-leaves, seemingly divided, as Moses divided them, into four bands, consisting of three tribes in each. The Jews retain this significance of the lily to this day. In their service on the day of atonement they use these words : “ Thou, who hast chosen this day in the year, and appointed it as a balm and cure for the nation likened unto the lily, when thy temple existed aforetime in Jerusalem.”! ( The Jew , by Myer, p. 390.) Whether the lotus was a symbol of Israel or not, its use as a symbol by the Buddhists is well known, and if we succeed, as we * “ The lotus leaves and flowers are supported upon stalks about a yard long. The calyx is divided into four, embracing the flower, resembling a gigantic magnolia flower, the ideal of elegant cups, a foot in diameter, of a rosy colour, very brilliant towards the edges. These rosy petals, or leaves of the corolla, are normally a dozen, and overlap each other like tiles upon a roof.” — “ Household Words,” Sept. 5, 1857, p. 230. f “ Israel shall grow as the lily.” — Hos. xiv. 5. 6 INTRODUCTION. hope, in tracing Buddhism to an Israelitish origin, the force of what has been stated concerning the lotus will be more evident. But, for the present, let us turn away from this symbol to our own ; it is the Cross that is conquering the enemies of civilization, and, with the open Bible, gives especial energy to the Saxon race. Though reason and the teaching of history would convince us that heathendom must perish, yet it is from other pages than those of history that we gather the in- telligence that associates the downfal of heathendom with the diffusion of Israelitish ideas. The burdens of the prophets are heavy with predictions, pointing to two grand events — the dispersion and the restora- tion of the Hebrew people. These things are trifles only to triflers. That people are the proof that their prophets spoke the truth, and the Western world feels much of their significance. There is a Hand ever amongst them pointing to their past and to their future. This we see only in relation to the tribes of Judah and Benjamin. Where are the other tribes? Emphatically lost, and yet there must be a spirit stirring amongst them that stirs the world. Can they ever be found? Perchance not; but that their influence, position, and transformations may be indi- cated, though, as a nation, they may be no more distinguished, will be shown in this volume. The way of the kings of the East, or rather the kings that come from the sunrising, is to be prepared by the drying-up of the Euphrates. Whatever that THE HEBREW BOOK AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE. 7 may mean, it is generally understood that the people referred to are Hebrew, and, if so, they must be of the Lost Tribes, Israelites, Beni-Israpl, since the Jews have never been hidden, and their seat is not the far East. Our research may throw some light on this question; but, as the mode and manner of it may present some new ideas, like images seen in obscurity, the reader will kindly refrain from hasty conclusions, and consent to feel his way along with the Avriter. The interest of the subject is not small, for the nature of the inquiry involves the consideration of some of the greatest problems of man’s history. Could-the Ten Tribes-be traced, we should find a key to much that is hidden in the history of the world and in the Bible, our understanding would be enlarged, and our faith confirmed. By fixing attention in the right direction we should see the face of Time more clearly through the veil thrown over it, and obtain a fuller insight of the wisdom and the providence concerned in the distribution of the human races, for the higher development of man’s intellect and energies in the commerce and the war- fares of the world. Traces of the Lost Tribes have been supposed tcT be found in Mexico* * * § and in Malabar, f in England J and in Japan. § The Afghg,nsj?Iaim to be the very * See Simon’s work on Israel in America. f C. Buchanan on the Hebrews in Malabar. — “ Christian Researches.” t Wilson on our Israelitish origin. § Dr. Bettelheim on Loochoo and Japan. 8 INTRODUCTION. people, and tlieir claims are sustained by many intelli- gent witnesses. Abyssinia is also said to possess some of them, and even Central Africa is not without evidence of their presence.* In short, the learned have discovered Israelitish influence in every land, “ from China to Peru.” What is our inference? Why, that there is truth in that prophecy which said that Israel should be sown among the nations, swallowed up, and yet not lost. (Hos. viii. 8.) Amongst the most civilized nations the Hebrew influence is known and acknowledged ; but this, as already observed, is due to the Book which we have derived from the Hebrew nation, and to the disper- sion of the Jews, who are popularly supposed to include the whole house of Israel; but the Jews themselves very properly regard themselves as dis- tinct from the Ten Tribes who revolted from the throne of David. We perceive that prophecy is ful- filled in relation to the Jews as dispersed; but we * There are multitudes of Jews, in every variety of condition, in the north of Africa ; but there are probably more of the Hebrew race far within the interior, about Timbuctoo and the Lake Tsad, and still further to the south. To the latter we should look for traces of their connexion with the Lost Tribes. It is well known that the Gha and other Negro tribes have numerous well-marked Jewish characters in their religious observances. A paper by Mr. Hanson, a native preacher, read before the British Associa- tion of Science, at Swansea, 1848, leaves no doubt of the fact. Now, unless we suppose that the Hebrews were derived from the interior of Africa, we must suppose that the Hebrews have penetrated there, and thence diffused the elements of civilization, and prepared the centre of the land of Ham for the blessings of Christianity and the new order of universal government to be at last established. Christian and scientific missionaries will probably soon afford us more light on the subject. — See Latham’s “Varieties of Man,” p. 476. THE HEBREW BOOK AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE. 9 require larger views, both of nations and of prophecy, in order to discover the influence of the Ten Tribes. The dispersion of the Jews is a testimony to those nations who have received Christianity ; but, viewing the principle on which prophecy is constructed, we should expect to find the history of other nations illustrated by the prophecies that refer to the disper- sion and influence of the Ten Tribes. The following pages are intended to point attention to them, with a view to trace their connexion with the nations of India, and with all the civilized kindreds of the earth. As the Bible will be quoted as authoritative testimony, it may be well to state the writer’s views with regard to the character and scope of that testi- mony. The Book assumes to be the record of the direct and divine teaching which its writers enjoyed, and it appeals to two especial modes of proof in respect to the truth of its pretensions — first, the adaptation of its doctrines to the spiritual wants of man; and, secondly, the fulfilment of its predictions in human history and in individual experience. The first proof is the pleading of the Inspirer of the Book, through the Avords contained in it, with a man’s own soul; the second is a demonstration to those who are sufficiently instructed to observe the coincidence between the events foretold and the real history of Divine Providence amongst mankind. The appeal is that of the Perfect Being to man as an intelligent being, capable of understanding that worlds and souls are governed on the principles of righteousness 10 INTKODUCTION. and love. We are called on to observe the connexion and relation between the moral and religious condi- tion of man and the history of his race. As humanity is one in nature, so is providence. There is a unity of working towards man in the revelations of that Being who made man. The Creative Spirit who made the worlds, moulded man of dust, and inspired the breathing soul with self-consciousness and will, is represented as of course concerned, that a being whom He has so endowed should apprehend the prin- ciple on which He necessarily acts towards man from first to last. If this be true, then every glimpse of the connexion between prophecy and history will help us to connect the beginning of man with the end of man, the design of his creation with its fulfilment. In short, research of any kind is only so far really interesting and important as it enables us to perceive new evidence of the fact that the Maker of man is ordering man’s circumstances with respect to a foreseen and predicted end, in which the moral relation of man to his Creator shall be demonstrated. That is to say, all knowledge is perverted that does not increase our faith in the perfection of the superin- tending Intelligence, by proving to us that justice, love, wisdom, and omnipotence are one, and presiding alike over all the outgoings of existence. To know anything truly is to know the will of God in that thing, whether in relation to history, creation, or individual experience. That the Divine Mind is expressed in man’s united history is the doctrine of THE HEBREW BOOK AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE. 11 the Bible ; and it is only in that Book that we find a bond of connexion between man and man through all his kindreds, from the beginning to the present, and to the end. Without that Book each man has a tendency to isolation, limited only by the interests of his immediate relationships; but with that Book we become conscious of our relation to all that can be known and all that can be felt by any people in any period of the world. These observations bear largely on our subject, for we propose seeking after the remnants and ramifications of that peculiar people who were selected, trained and judged, and scattered for the very purpose, as the prophets inform us, that mankind in general might learn more concerning the methods of the divine government, as that of a just God and a Saviour. Our inquiry instructs us as to the value of an authentic, inspired, and well-preserved book of doc- trine. Without a Bible every man who could might write his own Bible, and constitute his doctrines and his decalogue according to his own desires, and as far as other men would let him, act accordingly. We cannot find a man who needs no record of divine deeds, no divine doctrines, no history, no prophecy to instruct him, and to keep him up to the height of his own capacity for improvement ; and where there are none of those things the mind dwindles down to a state of spiritual inanition, or lapses into barbarism and savageness. Man must believe in moral prin- ciples evinced in deeds and doctrines above his own 12 INTRODUCTION. impulses in order to his elevation. “ Unless a man erect himself above himself, how poor a thing is man ! ” He must have faith in God as revealing Himself, that is, His will, through some medium, as the Author and Finisher of all that pertains to the well-being of man, before he can be improved. As a man cannot intend to act if he believes he cannot, so neither can he aim at a higher position morally and intellectually without evidence that man may attain it. He must see a human example of the fact, and know how it may become his. Divine teaching implies communication in words as to what is desir- able and possible, and it further implies its commu- nication as felt truth from one human mind to another. Hence revelation has always taken two chief forms, alike interesting to thinking men — first, prophesying as foreshowing the working out of divine moral government in relation to human his- tory; and, secondly, the mode and medium of wor- shipping God as evinced in doctrines and taught by divine deeds in the past history or experience of men. Hence, the book containing a record of such deeds is essential to the perpetuation of pure religion; and hence, too, the necessity for the general diffusion of the instruction contained in that book. Men everywhere believe that there has been or that there still is a revelation. All men believe in the best book, morally speaking, of which they know; hence, every people that has a literature has its authoritative book or books, and every nation respects THE HEBREW BOOK AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE. 13 other nations just according to that nation’s estimate of the written religious code belonging to those nations. Is not the government of India in English hands partially paralysed, notwithstanding our con- quests, because, though professing to be Christian, it has yet been afraid, from the first, to set the Bible open before those whom it would govern? The Mahomedans in India have been truer to their Pro- phet than Englishmen have been to their God; and therefore, though they would compel idolaters to submit to the Koran, yet the Hindoos were ready rather to band themselves with those consistent alike in their creed and their cruelty, than submit to milder masters whose faith seemed to be only a compromise, if it were not the mere worship of Mammon. The Indian government have charged the preachers of the Cross with worse than foolishness, and yet the seed sown by those very preachers has saved that land. Our Bible is our only credential, and woe be unto us if we are ever ashamed of it ! Common sense in every country having a book, believes in the need of a permanent word, or written revelation; and hence the multitude of false Bibles in the world. The necessity of a moral law is felt ; but that law is really found written out plainly in no book, and in no heart, but as it is transcribed from the volume of the Hebrews ; and yet it is from the history of Israel that we derive the deepest insight of the consequences of breaking the laws of worship and sociality. It was a speculative idolatry which led to 14 INTRODUCTION. the deportation and final dispersion of the Ten Tribes; for that idolatry, produced by the most degrading conceptions of the Divine attributes, gendered a wor- ship of symbols that at once blinded the common mind, and hindered the people’s reception of God’s teaching in their history and by their inspired pro- phets, while it also brought down their morality to the low level of the heathen. The Holy Land rejected them. It will be no vain pursuit if we endeavour to trace some of the results in the dispersion of Israel. Since Rome with iron rule subjugated the nations and trampled down the Holy City, where the Son of God taught the words of life to those who crucified Him, the scattering of the Jews amongst the peoples has been everywhere recognised as the judgment of God for their rejection of his mercy. The trampling down of the Holy Land by the worst of the Gentiles (Ezek. vii. 24), and its division by the Turks, has been so visibly the fulfilment of prophecy, that, even according to the creed of Mahomet, the Turks do not own it, but only hold it in keeping till God requires it for some purpose still in reserve, or till the punish- ment of the Jews is complete, Avhen they are again to possess it. The Jews themselves wait for their restoration, and expect it soon. But still the scattered families of Judah, as a wonder, a sign, and a witness, stand apart, belonging to no nation, though ruling the money-markets of the world. At least seven millions of such witnesses testify to the people of Christendom that prophecy is the light of God to THE HEBREW BOOK AND THE HEBREW PEOPLE. 15 man. There is warning and promise, as well as pro- phecy, to the whole civilized world, in the present state and known history of those scattered Jews. But there are other Hebrews besides these who are telling upon the world. There are those tribes that never returned from beyond the Euphrates to the Land of Promise. Their history, too, will indicate the wisdom, power, and love of Him who scattered them. They are representatives of Joseph and Ephraim and Manasseh ; and the blessings that fell from the pro- phetic mouth of the aged Isaac, in whom all the families of the earth are to be blessed, are not void to the Lost Tribes. The Hand that rules the waves and directs the streams of life is upon them ; though they seemed but as a wild herd choosing their own way in the desert, yet they are really led as if by a shepherd amongst the mountains. Now that the winding up of the world’s history is at hand, some sudden light is likely to fall upon their history which shall show that the Author of prophecy is the God of providence. The direct descendants of those who crucified their King are seen in every Christian land with the veil upon their heart, but still reading the holy books and observing the traditions of their fathers, and proving to us the truth of prophecy in a manner scarcely less than miraculous. What the Jews are to Christendom, the other outcasts of Israel, u the remnant left from Assyria,” will be to the heathen in the East. We seem to hear the voices of the dead in the significant language put by the prophet into 16 INTRODUCTION. the mouth of that outcast Israel, “ After two days lie will revive as , in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight." (Hos. vi. 1, 2 ) This life, then, is in faith, faith in their king Immanuel, “ de- clared to be the Son of God with power, by the resurrection of the dead.” We are in the midst of the third day from the date of Israel’s captivity if, according to St. Peter’s call to remembrance, we are to regard a day as literally a thousand years; and a Jew would scarcely understand the idea of an indefi- nite period. But, not to discuss such points here, we will now pass on in search, first, of prophetic indi- cations, and then of facts, concerning the dispersion of the Ten Tribes and their influence on the world. When we have followed some of the traces of their dispersion, we shall be prepared to consider what con- nexion can be discovered between that event, the religious system of Buddhism, and the formation of the Saxon and Gothic nations. THE TKEE OF BUDDHA. 17 CHAPTER I. EZEKIEL’S VISION — THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. As the prophet Ezekiel addressed the words of Jehovah to the captives of Israel, and was himself one amongst them, we turn to his prophecies as the most likely to contain those guiding indications of which we are now in search. The prophet witnessed the varied and degrading idolatries into which the professed people of God had fallen. Instead of testi- fying against the heinous sins connected with the worship of idols and deified ideas, those who possessed the holy oracles had mingled the words of God with the ritual of idols, confounded the doctrines of Heaven with those of Hell, and, no longer seeking forgiveness of sin by the appointed sacrifices, and at the mercy - seat beneath the wings of the golden cherubim, they had profaned the holy place and the holy Name; and, no longer looking for the Shechinah of Jehovah’s presence, they gloried in painted and gilded gods of their own making, and sought no honour but such as accorded with the obscenities, cruelties, and blasphe- mies of their own abominable habits. The prophet witnessed this and was astonished. He foresaw the obstinate adherence of this people to their adopted idolatries; and, the Holy Spirit stirring his heart c 18 ezekiel’s vision — with holy indignation and abhorrence, caused the words of burning truth to burst from his lips while he denounced them as outcasts. But yet, in the feeling of Jehovah’s retributions, because of his holiness, he felt, too, that the wisdom and the love of the Almighty must still find utterance ; and therefore, through the terrible array of wrath he saw, also, the triumphs of mercy. Hence, in the prophecy spoken against the rebellious house of Israel, the wondrous course of a redeeming Providence is depicted upon the cloud that bears the lightning and the thunder; even the judgments that pursue the people in their wanderings point ever to the eternal refuge. The prophet opens his stupendous mission in awful symbols, and in a manner worthy of the grand occa- sion, his words and his thoughts being alike divinely appropriate to the purpose. Like St. John the divine, in the Spirit on the Lord’s day, an exile, alone in soul, but that angels came to him, the prophet seems to look as if into the opened heavens, and, beholding with the Spirit’s eye future times and existences unformed except in spirit, he foretells, with the dis- tinctness of one describing what he sees, the destinies of Israel, and the results of their dispersion in rela- tion to the world. Let us imagine ourselves amongst the rocks above the green and flowery banks of the river Chebar,* as it flows in silvery smoothness through the open valley, fed by many a murmuring streamlet gushing down from the brown hills and scattering the gleams * “ Per solitudines aboraeque amnis herbidas ripas,” says Ammiamis of the river Chebar. — M. 1. xiv. c. i ii. THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 19 of the declining sunshine like things of life rejoicing in the light. A lonely man slowly paces the green- sward ; now with fixed gaze he bows his face towards the ground, intent on reverent thoughts, and now with keen eye upraised to the cloudless heavens, as if he would penetrate the profoundity of the Infinite, and see God. He stands with covered brow as he seems to con- template some wondrous scene spreading out before his eye on the wide plain towards the north. A whirlwind is rolling on from thence with a vast cloud upon its wings, turning rapidly upon its centre, carrying fire in its bosom, and shedding an amber- coloured radiance around its path. The appearance of four living creatures proceeds from the whirling cloud, and they look in the distance like human beings. But each has four faces and four wings, and their feet are like those of a young heifer, narrow and sharp, and hollow-soled and cloven, and they shine like burnished brass. On each of the four sides of the advancing mystery there are faces and wings ; and under the wings, human hands. Their wings meet together above their heads, and they fly straight forward in each direction, expanding as they fly, and yet continuing united by their wings above. Each of the living beings has the face of a man, with the face of a lion on the right side. There are the faces of a man, a lion, an ox, and an eagle appropriate to each of the living beings. They have each four wings and four faces. Two of the four wings of each creature are stretched out above; and these join the wings, each of the other, on all sides, and with the c 2 20 ezekiel’s vision — other two wings each creature covers its body. Thus winged and protected they go straight forward as the spirit in them wills to move ; they turn not as if to determine where to go, but they move straight on to every quarter of the world. There is a bril- liance about them as of burning- coals or flaming lamps, and a flashing as of lightning. Their whole appearance is that of a fire of glowing coals, or of torches in the wind flaring out sudden gleams of brilliance, or, like the aurora-borealis , with intercurrent flashes of brightness, or, as we witness often in a rising storm, the lightning plays, with continuous flashes, amidst the dark, rolling clouds. The living beings themselves seem to change places, and pass and repass with the speed of lightning. See the first chapter of Ezekiel. The meaning of the wondrous symbols is not mani- fest, and, alas, our commentators give us little learn- ing, and less light on the subject. Will it not be better to view the subject in the light of common sense, and of scriptural, as well as of classical usage in the employment of symbolical language? By this means we may possibly obtain a clear meaning with- out any display of particular research, and that, too, without presumption. We must remember that the prophet is standing on the banks of the river Chebar, in Kurdistan, and looking towards the northern heavens. From this quarter he beholds the whirling fiery cloud advancing towards him, and then he descries the wondrous appearances proceeding out of it. Now, according to prophetic usage, a whirlwind, a cloud, and a fire signify a multitude of people THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 21 scattered by some violence, and spreading mischief, and therefore the first idea we derive from this de- scription is that of an invading army from the north. We need not stay to prove that the symbol of a cloud signifies a multitude, and by implication a great power of accomplishing either good or evil. This figure is a natural one, and frequently used by poets ; thus, in Homer (II. ver. 273), a cloud of foot is a great company of foot soldiers. Jeremiah (iv. 13), in announcing the approach of an invading army, em- ploys several of the figures here introduced. “ Be- hold, he shall come up as clouds , and his chariots shall be as a whirlwind ; his horses are swifter than eagles .” Ezekiel, in describing the descent of Gog, uses similar terms (xxxviii. 15, 16, and also 9, 10). A cloud very aptly symbolizes a multitude in motion, for in Eastern countries a cloud of dust from the dry soil usually accompanies an army. Xenophon, in his Anabasis , finely notices this fact. When Cyrus was approaching Artaxerxes, over a vast plain, like that over which the prophet was looking when he saw the future in his vision, the first indication of the enemy’s approach was “ a white cloud seen in the distant horizon, spreading far and wide. As the cloud drew nearer, the bottom of it appeared dark and solid. As it still advanced, it was observed in various parts to gleam and glitter in the sun ; and soon after, the ranks of horse and foot, and armed chariots were distinctly seen.” As regards the symbolical meaning of winds we may find sufficient evidence in the Holy Scriptures, or we might refer to profane and classical writers. 22 EZEKIELS VISION — In Jeremiah (xlix. 36, 37), the symbol is again em- ployed, and again explained — “ And upon Elam I will bring the four winds from the four quarters of heaven , and I will scatter them towards all those winds; and there shall be no nation whither the outcasts of Elam shall not come. For 1 will cause Elam to be dismayed before their enemies , and I will send the sword after them, until I have consumed them” The fire and the coloured brightness proceeding from it are less familiar symbols. What does the language of prophecy teach concerning fire? When associated with other indications of evil, it denotes sickness, affliction, torment, destruction, and purifica- tion, as we find in such passages as the following : “ Therefore he hath poured upon him the fury of his anger and the strength of the battle , he hath set him on fire round about , and it burned him , yet he laid it not to heart. For behold , the Lord will come with fire, and his chariots like a whirlwind , to render his anger with fury , and his rebuke like flames of fire.” (Isai. lxvi. 15.) “ Yea, I will gather you and blow upon you in the fire of my wrath , and ye shall be melted in the midst.” “ I will bring the third part through the fire, and I will refine them.” (Zech. xiii. 9.) With the significance of colour the readers of the Bible in general are, unfortunately, very little ac- quainted, and hence they lose very much of the beautiful truth so frequently 7 expressed by it. The symbolical meaning of colours and of their combina- tions was comparatively well understood by the ancients; and even in the Middle Ages this variety of symbolism was in some degree preserved amongst us, THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 23 though now the cloud of the dark ages, without its Iris, seems to have settled down on the colleges of heraldry, and we look in vain to the learned in coats of arms to tell us what they mean by the colours, yet so religiously preserved in their distinctness by the emblazoners of shields and crests. The spirit and sense of religious truth was once expressed in heraldry, but now, perhaps, more of the spirit of pride and pretension. In our cathedral windows we may see the Apostles and their Lord, robed in the hues of light, as significant of the individual character attri- buted to each of them by ancient artists, who painted with conventional meaning in their colours. But we know not where now to look for an interpretation of their luminous language, though it appears that modern artists, in reverent ignorance, perpetuate the symbols, while they have lost their significance. If we may receive the testimony of those who, like Moses, were learned in Egyptian lore, or in that of the Etruscans and the Hebrews, all the colours of light were to them expressive of spiritual truths. The Israelites seem clearly to have understood the varied renderings of light on the gemmed breast- plate of the high priest, and every tint, as well as every form in the furniture, and the decorations of the tabernacle and the temple, spake with intelligence to the wise amongst them. This symbolism of colour was calculated to become a universal language. Thus, in India and China the characters of their deities and their doctrines are expressed by colours understood by the initiated. In Hue’s translation of the Chinese records of Christianity we read of the luminous 24 EZEKIEL S VISION — religion being conveyed in the blue chariot, and its doctrine being a blue cloud, because it is truth from heaven. We read of the vermilion palace, and the adornments of all colours , and, as usual, we take what we do not understand for mere poetry, instead of perceiving what the fathers of the world intended to tell us, namely, that they believed all moral and social excellences to stand in relation, first, to the pure white light of heaven, and then to the primitive colours blue, j'ellow, and red, as expressive of faith, hope, and love in their earthly manifestation. Tfie days of the week are beautifully, though, alas, now idola- trously, associated with Divine qualities by the Brahmins : thus, Sunday is pure sun-light; Monday or Moonday, as its reflection is white, that is purity ; Tuesday, flame-coloured coral, or love and hope in action; Wednesday, the emerald, kindliness and ac- commodation ; Thursday, the topaz, holy knowledge ; Friday, the diamond, light embodied as in a teacher; Saturday, the sapphire, truth, slow and sure. Each day of the week is thus connected with the mani- festation of some deity, which is expressed by the appropriate colour. The seven precious things honoured by Buddhists, in China, and elsewhere, are gems, or other substances of various colours. These are used to express virtues, and are accordingly found in the tombs of Buddhist notables in India.* The science of colour as a symbol has been too much neglected; for, while the facts of material action and phenomena have been sufficiently regarded, their moral meaning has been overlooked, and is now * See Mythology of India, and Major Cunningham’s Bhilsa Topes. THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 25 almost lost to us. But, if we would apprehend the sure word of prophecy, and throw its light into dark places, we must give more heed to the language of symbol, lest the Apocalypse of heaven should have been written in vain for us. The amber-coloured or golden brightness proceeding out of the midst of the fire and cloud described by the prophet would, to a learned Oriental, probably signify love and mercy accompanying the infliction of the wrath denounced against the people on whom the invasion was to fall. It is not the colour of pure unclouded light, but of light seen through a hazy medium, a diffused mixture of red and yellow, such as we sometimes witness in a summer sunset or in the glow of the rising day. Whether in the words of prophecy, or in the sky, or in the hedgerow flower, this colour always means the same thing. It means that, whatever wrath may prevail, and whatever clouds may surround us, hope and love still live, and that the divine character is still written upon nature with the same finger that moulded man and put the bloom upon his cheek in token of love and hope, as the natural expression of healthful life. God’s own names of love and light are written by the ancients in letters of gold and vermilion. Though the accommodating glories of the Omnipotent arise out of a profundity too deep, and therefore too dark, for an angel’s ken to penetrate, yet all above us and around, says, “ Look, 0 man, to Him who made you, and raise your eye towards heaven; and, even in the midnight you shall see the glories of His wondrous hand more sweetly and yet more vastly 26 EZEKIEL’S VISION than in the meridian day. The light of eternity beams forth in golden radiance from immeasurable darkness, all space is full of eyes piercing with their gentle brightness into your soul, 0 man, if you will but believe in it. The colours of all the stars are those of truth and love.” Next to the whirlwind, and the cloud, and their attendant glory, we have presented to us in the pro- phet’s vision the results of those phenomena. Out of the cloud came, as it were, four living beings re- sembling man (ver. 5). This scarcely needs expo- sition, as life, or living being, is the ordinary Oriental term for collective existence, especially in relation to mankind as existing in connected societies. Hence, from the general appearance of the whole vision, we are taught that, out of this invasion from the north, four varieties of human institutions should spread in all directions in association with men having amongst them the same elements and means of intelligence, industry, endurance, and success. Each division, having four faces and four wings, intimates four modes of manifesting the mental character under all circumstances, together with as many modes of advancement and defence. All these appearing under the form either of one cherub, viewing their faces collectively, or as four cherubs, viewed separately, signifies that the movements and peculiarities of the collective bodies of living beings are especially appointed, qualified, and directed by Divine Power, with reference to the ultimate revela- tion of wisdom, truth, justice, and mercy, as evinced in all the ways of Providence, both in the physical and THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 27 spiritual history of the human race; or, at least, of that part of it here signified. Layard, in his work on the Nimroud sculptures, points out the resemblance between the symbolic figures employed by the prophet Ezekiel in his sublime vision, and the Assyrian religious emblems supposed to be typical of divine attributes. Ezekiel, no doubt, had seen those emblems ; but the figures of a man, a lion, an ox, and an eagle, as emblematic of Divine Power in relation to the chosen tribes were, as we shall show, employed and understood by the Israelites long before their captivity; and, therefore, if the prophet meant to refer to Assyrian ideas at all, which is very doubtful, he certainly would, by that reference, teach the Israelites, to whom he addressed his prophecies, how all the attributes of the true God, Jehovah, and not a confusion of divinities, were con- cerned in carrying out his purposes with regard to his chosen people. The feet of the living beings are first particularized (ver. 7). The feet are the inferior extremities of the body, and signify the lower form of what is natural and necessary to the carrying out of any physical effort or design. Thus our Lord, in washing the feet of his disciples, taught them not only humi- lity, but that even those parts of their nature most exposed to defilement were perfectly cleansed by Him, and if they walked together aright and according to his Word, should be preserved pure. To sit at the feet is to take the place of the humble scholar, and to set foot on a place is to take bodily possession of it and to rule there; as in Deut. i. 36, xi. 24; Rev. 28 ezekiel’s vision — x. 2; Ps. xliv. 5, xci. 13; Isai. xxvi. 6; Dan. vii. 23; Mai. iv. 3. Pharaoh is said to trouble the waters with his feet (Ezek. xxxii. 2); which in the Targum is interpreted to mean that his auxiliaries, or bor- rowed soldiers, trampled down the people whom they invaded like a river rushing over the ground. The feet of the symbolic creatures are said to be straight or narrow, and flat at the base like the feet of a calf; probably to indicate the fitness of the power or people typified to walk through difficulties, just as creatures of the ox kind can pass over the most difficult and miry places in conseqence of their feet expanding as they descend into the mire, and, from their peculiar construction, immediately contracting again when drawn up; thus rendering it easy for them and naturally agreeable to traverse those countries in which other creatures would be lost, or find no foot- ing and no food. Thus, the head of the ox, together with the feet of the calf, indicates their fitness to occupy the course of rivers, and reap advantage from those lands which, from their abounding in water, may, by industry and proper natural appliances, be rendered most productive of food for man and beast. The colour of the feet, sparkling like burnished brass, expresses a furbished firmness and preparedness, with means of action and of progress, both strong and bright. The Grecian empire is symbolized by brass in Daniel. St. John, in the Apocalypse, saw Jesus with feet like fine brass as if burning in a furnace (Rev. i. 15), and, in Daniel’s vision at Hiddekel, the army and the mighty one whom he there saw, and which mighty one predicted war and divisions, THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 29 appeared with feet, in colour, like polished brass, as if to signify that the angel was commissioned to employ natural means, as the minister of Jehovah, to conquer and subdue, by power and violence, the natural opposers of righteousness. (Dan. x. 6.) Just as now, in China and in India, Jehovah is at war with oppressors by means of those ap- pointed. “ The hands of a man were under their wings on their four sides.” This sentence expresses the fact that human agency and skill were spontaneously, and as if with perfect freewill, engaged in carrying out the movements and desires of the living creatures, or collective bodies of men. The hands are the instru- ments of reason. Throughout the Holy Scriptures the actions of the hands are employed to express those of the heart and mind in the exercise of power. Thus, to give the hand is a token of submission (as in 2 Chron. xxx. 8; Ps. lxviii. 31; Lam. v. 6). Horace (Epod. xvii.) uses the same expression. These hands, or the peculiar human instruments of the in- telligent will, were employed in all directions under the united wings, or under the protection and sus- taining power of an ever-connected and connecting Providence. There is no break, no interruption to God’s purpose and proceedings; and as the cherubim over the mercy-seat in the Holy of Holies had their wings joined above and below, so it is all through nature and providence. The ministry of Jehovah’s messengers is unbroken and unceasing, and man’s agency and volition break not the chain of Divine causations. Thus Solomon placed the two cherubim 30 EZEKIEL’S VISION — within the oracle, with wings extended from wall to wall. (1 Kings vi. 27.) The Persians understood wings to symbolize power and possession. Thus Cyrus, in his prognostic vision, when sleeping in the country of the Massa- getie, saw Darius, the eldest son of Hystaspes, with wings on his shoulders, like a cherub, one of which overshadowed Asia, and the other Europe; a vision fulfilled in that Darius who befriended Daniel. “ So this Daniel prospered in the reign of Darius »and in the reign of Cyrus the Persian.” Dan. vi. 28. The Hebrew word that signifies a wing also means a covering. Eagles’ wings are mentioned as symbols of Divine protection and conveyance in Exodus xix. 4. The phrase “ the wind hath hound them up in her wings” is used by Hosea (iv. 19) to denote the con- dition of Ephraim, or the tribes of Israel, when torn from their native land, and scattered by the Assyrian conqueror, and afterwards to the four quarters of the world, and never suffered to rest, but still, under Divine protection, supplied with power and guidance. The faces are the outward expressions of inward characters, and these are symbolized by a union of the human face with that of a lion on one side, and that of an ox with that of an eagle on the other. To explain this we must refer to the legionary standards of the hosts of Israel, headed by Judah, Reuben, Ephraim, and Dan. (Num. x.) Under each of these, according to the Targum, marched three tribes. Each standard was of three colours, like the precious stones in the breast-plate of the high priest, on which the names of the tribes were emrraven. Now. be- THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 31 sides these appropriate colours, it is stated, by Abenezra and others, that the banners had embla- zoned on them the emblems of each tribe. That of Reuben was the form of a man; that of Judah, a lion ; that of Ephraim, an ox ; that of Dan, an eagle. Thus, we have ancient, and in this matter, good au- thority, for believing that the Israelites understood the emblems employed by the prophet Ezekiel to mean their own tribes collectively.* As in each of the four living beings the whole of these emblems of the Israelitish tribes were united, as if under one system of co-operation — and as these fourfold manifestations of Divine order over-ruling human effort issued from the whirlwind and the cloud — it is reasonable to conclude that the wise amongst the Israelites, to whom the prophecy was addressed, understood it to signify that, under the * The cherubim, or four living creatures of St. John’s vision, are similar to those of Ezekiel, and they are attended by similar evidences of the dominion of God in their presence, as indicated by lightnings and thunder- ings, and voices, and the seven lamps of burning fire, i.e., the seven spirits of God. The character in which the power of Him who sits on the throne is manifested amongst them is represented by the colours of the sardine and jaspar being compared to his appearance, while the rainbow around his throne is like an emerald. Each living creature has six wings, and is full of eyes before and behind, and within. The glacial, sea-like crystal, too, is there. All these things may be fairly understood to signify that it is the scat- tered seed of Israel, far and near, who are to cry night and day, “ Holy, holy, holy, Lord God Almighty, which was and is to come.” The type is carried on from the literal Israel to the Christian Church, so that our in- terpretation of the cherubim or living creatures being symbols of the Israelites is here confirmed. He who is the root of David, of Judah, the lion tribe, is also the lamb in the midst of the throne, to whom the four living creatures, namely, a lion, a calf, a man, and a flying eagle, symbo- lizing the chosen tribes, sing “ Thou hast redeemed us to God by thy blood.” (Rev. iv. 4.) So that this triumphant song is tha,t of Israel in their conversion, the future being realized as present to the Seer of Patmos. 32 ezekiel’s vision — violent incursion of an army from the north, they should be scattered, and that yet in that scattering all the tribes should be involved and driven forth, as if by the winds, towards the four quarters of the heavens, and over all the earth. But yet, amidst the seeming confusion, they were taught that an exact providence should preside over them, and mercy be visible in judgment; for the purposes of Jehovah in the separation of Israel from the nations should not be frustrated, notwithstanding the entire failure of the chosen tribes in the covenant made with them and with their fathers. We may also learn from this symbolic portraiture that in this fourfold, and yet united system of living beings spreading their influ- ence over all the earth, the characteristics of one division were the characteristics of the whole. 1. There are the human faces and human hands, with their power of expressing and evincing in- tellect, affection, and skill. 2. There is the face of the lion, expressive of courage and daring. 3. There is the face of the ox, speaking of patience, toil, and plenty. 4. There is the imperial eagle-face of keen- ness, far-seeing and decisive, and armed for rapine. We might sustain our interpretation by quoting authorities concerning the appropriateness of these symbols ; but probably a reference to the benediction and comprehensive prophecy of Moses will be suffi- cient to indicate the propriety with which one of the emblems is made to embrace three of the tribes. As an example, we may observe that, though Judah was designated by the dying Jacob as a lion’s whelp, the comparison of the lion is also applied to the tribes of THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 33 Dan and Gad by the dying Moses in his triumphant blessings on Israel. (Deut. xxxiii.) The symbol of a lion to convey the ideas of courage and strength is too frequently used in the Bible and other books to need explanation. That the ox was applied as the symbol of the tribes descended from Joseph we learn from the words of Moses : “ His glory is like the firstling of his bullock, his horns are like the horns of unicorns ; with them shall he push the people together to the ends of the earth.” (Deut. xxxiii. 17.) Here industry is indicated as the source of wealth and power, which push aside all opposition. Wherever agriculture has made any advancement, there the ox is admitted to be the appropriate symbol of industry and plenty and power. With regard to the eagle it should be remarked that the prophet seems to mention the eagle almost in a parenthetical manner at the end of his descrip- tion : “ They four had also the face of an eagle,” as if this symbol were especially required, above all, to designate the tribes of Israel in their dispersion over the earth. The prophet Ezekiel himself applies this symbol to express an idea of kingly power. (Chap, xvii. 3, 7, 12.) In Isaiah the eagle denotes Cyrus, whose ensign was an eagle. iEschylus applies the same symbol to Xerxes. (Cheoph. v. 245.) This symbol may fairly be regarded as most remarkable when applied to the scattered tribes, since it indicates that, notwithstanding their dispersion, they should acquire kingly authority. This symbol is the more significant, since it is as kings from the East, or the sun-rising, that the tribes are to be recognised, when D 34 ezekiel’s vision — their way is prepared by the drying up of Euphrates. It is then to be observed, “that they four” that is, all the tribes, “ had also the face of an eagle,” as if to show that each of the four divisions under which the tribes were classed, should be possessed of regal dignity, however disguised. With regard to the symbol of a man, which, though the first in order, we consider last, there is more to be said than can here be conveniently admitted. But that the idea intended to be conveyed is that of intel- ligence and affection need hardly be observed. More, far more, however, is probably designed to be taught by the symbol, since, in several parts of the prophecy of Ezekiel, the man is spoken of as especially in- structing him in the purposes of God. The man who measures the departments of the temple, and marks out the localities for all the tribes is understood to be Immanuel, and it is He who still accompanies the dispersed and desolated people, bringing them by ways they knew not at last to recognise Himself as their Saviour and their King. “ Thy judgments are as the light,” says the prophet Hosea to the Ten Tribes. The judgment sent upon the tribes goes with them as a present, instructing spirit, everywhere. The burning coals of purifying affliction or of destroying fire, and the flashing light of severe instruction, accompany them, and going up and down amongst them in all directions, shooting out lightnings, not only enlightening, while discomfiting themselves, but also all amidst whom they come. They bear the lightning with them in all their goings (ver. xiv.), they carry light or destruction to THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 35 their opposers, and become mighty by their trials. This is the especial prediction concerning the descen- dants of Isaac, known and unknown ; and we believe that history confirms the prophecy in all its bearings. Without further enlargement of the subject, at present, we here obtain the idea of a vast commingling of Israel with some northern power, rushing in upon the country over which the prophet is supposed to be looking. He and his Israelitish brethren were then exiles in the valleys and hills of Mesopotamia and Media. The tribes were to be involved in this northern cloud, and by it scattered to the four winds. The wisdom and goodness of God are to be seen in the providence which appoints and accom- panies this wide and ultimate dispersion. The spheres and regions of government under which the outcasts shall be brought, are to illustate the might and the mercy of the Omnipotent Ruler of all the cycles of time, and all the revolutions alike of nations and of worlds. The wheels within wheels, the spheres within spheres, the cycles upon cycles, how- ever vast and distant in the prospective, however dreadful and unsearchable in their extent, are all informed by an indwelling Intelligence. Like the vault of heaven on a starry night, the terrible extent and seeming depth of darkness is full of revolving order, and there are eyes looking through it, and pervading it; revolving bands of light are tying the universe together; and, go where Ave may, we cannot escape their influence, and their hold upon us. The Divine attention is on the multitudes of people in their dispersions, and, hoAvever human energy may d 2 36 EZEKIEL 8 VISION be called into action, and seemingly be causing and determining consequences, yet all the evolutions of humanity are but working out and fulfilling the purposes of the Almighty, within the bounds first appointed, as regards time as well as space, for He has fixed the laws of all being. The angels of God are as his eyes, searching into all things pertaining to our nature, and going up and down, so to say, amongst the branches of the two olive trees that stand before the Lord of the whole earth. (Zech. iv. 3 ; Rev. xi. 4.) The spirit of the living beings, that is, life itself, with human will, intelligence, and activity, is in the movements everywhere. Through all re- gions, and in every cycle, Providence overrules and regulates the movements of the vast host passing along on wings, with the noise of many waters, like the voice of the Almighty in the thunders of his power, though still the articulate voice is that of man, speaking alike in reason and affection (ver. 24). The firmament is stretched over them from the re- gions of the terrible crystal,* or the icy boundaries of the frozen north, even to the burning south : that firmament is like a sapphire throne of truth and justice, above which sits a man having the amber- coloured glory around him from head to foot, as if beaming forth from all his body in the purifying brightness of commingled judgment and mercy. In the end of Ezekiel’s prophecy the man appears sur- rounded by the sevenfold harmony of pure light, as * As the word here translated crystal is rendered ice (Job vi. 16) and frost (Gen. xxxi. 40), we should be quite justified in rendering it ice or frost in this place instead of crystal. THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 37 seen by the beloved and loving disciple in the rain- bow around the throne. That is, the very glory of the risen, reigning Lord, who occupies the throne as a Lanib slain, and who ultimately reveals Himself to the whole worshipping universe, according to the covenant made with Noah in behalf of all living creatures,* when the rainbow was set in the clouds of heaven as a sign of mercy for ever. (Gen. ix. 16.) Thus, John saw the Lord Jesus enthroned amidst the adorning hosts above, the centre and the glory of all living beings, the source of life and light to all the systems of life in all worlds. As the Sun of righteousness He shines forth in all the attributes of beauty and of power, the centre and source of all attractiveness, life, and blessing, penetrating and possessing with the beams of his love all who are willing to receive and transmit the light of his glory. When the prophet was instructed to address the captives of Israel, it was foreseen that they would not receive his words (chap. ii. 7); and it was because of their love of idolatry and will-worship that the prophetic denunciations were heard amongst them. In the spirit of prophecy, which is the testimony of Jesus, the prophet went to the rebellious house of his brethren, declaring the woe that should come upon them there ; but, nevertheless, as he went he heard, as if behind him, in intimation of what should follow, a voice of a great rushing, yet distinctly saying, “ Blessed * The Hebrew word for living creature is the same as that of 9th of Genesis, where the covenant with Noah and every living creature is re- corded. 38 EZEKIEL’S VISION be the glory of the Lord from this place." (Chap, iii. 12.) In all the prophet’s progresses and visions and prophetic missions the sight and the sound of the living beings and of the wheels accompanied him, as if to afford an ever-present sustentation to his spirit under the trials of his commission ; for he was to utter words of fire against the impudence and hard- heartedness of his kindred, who would scorn and despise him and his godly messages. It is remark- able that in each of the chief divisions of his pro- phecies Ezekiel recurs to the vision which he saw from the banks of the river Chebar, as if this vision afforded a key in his own mind to the mystery of God’s providential proceeding in relation to his chosen, but now outcast people. He still saw, wherever he went, the golden glory beaming from the fiery cloud, and the brightness shining from the man whose body was brilliant as burnished brass, or as the molten metal pouring in a glowing stream from the opened furnace. (Chap. iii. 13; iii. 23; viii. 12.) Thus, when the elders of Judah sat with the prophet in his own house (viii. 12), the vision of the cherubic pre- sences, and of the glory of God in the plain, by the river Chebar, recurs to him; but most particularly when, in reference to the departure of the Shecliinah from the temple at Jerusalem, it was seen by him that the sapphire throne, the seat of truth and of righteousness, was still occupied, and the man in linen, the interceding high priest, was directed to go in between the wheels and the cherubim, or systems of living beings, and seize the burning coals, and THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 39 scatter them over the city, as if to destroy its polity for ever. And then a loud voice cried to the wheels in the prophet’s hearing, “ 0, wheel ! ” as if to say in one word, mighty in its meaning as the revolutions of the universe, “ though there be wheels in wheels, spheres in spheres, worlds in worlds, imperia in im- perils , still they are all turned by the Divine Hand, and in that Hand they are one.” The wheel seems to be the symbol of the ongoings of the Almighty, as seen in the Assyrian monuments, and amongst the symbols of Buddha; but an earlier employment of the symbol existed probably amongst the Hebrews. At least the voice cried, “ 0, wheel ! ” to the pro- phet’s spirit, when in vision he saw the four wheels with the face of a cherub, a man, a lion, and an eagle (Zech. x. 13), just as they appeared in that temple of Solomon called the house of the Lord Jehovah, which' was erected about 1004 b.c. The whole of the tribes appeared to be symbolized by the twelve oxen in the house of Solomon, and the eagle is wanting because he himself was the eagle. It has been questioned what kind of wheel was meant ; but we are told that “ the work of the [sym- bolic] Avheels was like the work of a chariot wheel,” having axletrees, naves, felloes, and spokes complete in all parts. (1 Kings vii. 33.) That a wheel signi- fies the proceeding superintendence of the Supreme Power was understood by the Greeks and Persians, as well as by the Hebrews, is shown by the address of Croesus the Lydian to Cyrus : “ There is a wheel in human affairs, which, continually revolving, does not suffer the same persons to be always success- 40 ezekiel’s vision — ful.” (Herod, i. 207.) It is remarkable, also, that in the tenth chapter (verse 5), where the prophet is re- ferring to God’s providence in Jerusalem, the beings having life, that is to say, the cherubim, are dif- ferently distributed; and, instead of the face of an ox, there appears the face of a cherub, in the first place. (Chap. x. 14.) This vision, apparently, relates to the after capti- vity and ultimate dispersion of Judah, for whom at that time the symbolic cherubs still spread their wings over the mercy-seat, and stood gazing on the golden tablet, as if to read what the finger of God would still in mercy write thereon for all Israel. As was the life, so was the providence. It is still with the use of Divine Power that the human will is working. While free as the winds and the electric forces that move the clouds and form them, yet, like them, all wills are moving according to fixed laws, by which the Divine Will subdues all things to eternal purposes. The wheels moved as the spirit of the living beings moved; and as the faces, or outward characters of the divided hosts were determined, so they went, that is to say, they went straightforward to the end necessarily resulting from the disposition manifested (ver. xv. 21). In this awful vision we witness the potency of the human spirit for good or for evil : good, in adapting itself to the gracious leadings of God’s providence, and to the laws of his moral government, thus proceeding direct to the diffusion and maintenance of all natural and spiritual blessings; while evil, on the other hand, consists in resistance to the teachings of Heaven, and leads only THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 41 to war and wasting, though, in these results, also, the Divine character shall be glorified. According to the state of man’s will and intelligence collectively and individually, will be the result nationally and personally. Even when lifted up, or removed from the sphere of earth, the spirit of the life remains in the living beings ; and according to the ordinance of Him who constituted both life and death, the sphere in which Ave choose to move .accompanies us, like the atmosphere of our existence, in whatever worlds we dwell, for it is the state of our wills with respect to God’s law that determines our position and consti- tutes the essence of our being. We must not over- look the important fact that when the glory of God, the Shechinah, departed from the Lord’s house at Jerusalem, it stood over the cherubim which the prophet saw by the river Chebar. He mentions the cherubim in this new relation as only one living creature (chap. x. 20), but as proceeding in a four- fold manner from the east gate of the Lord’s house with the glory of the God of Israel over them above. (Chap. x. 19.) “ This is the living creature [or com- pany of people'] that 1 saw under the God of Israel by the river of Chebar; and I knew that they were the cherubim These went forth, and the sound of their “ wings was heard , even to the outer court [that is, amongst the Gentiles], as the voice of the Almighty God when He speaketh." (Chap. x. 5.) From this chapter we gather that, from the dispersion of Judah, and from the casting out of Israel, Jehovah would speak with power concerning his providence, right- eousness, and mercy to the Gentiles, in all lands; but 42 ezekiel’s vision — that Israel, then in Assyria, should be mainly scattered eastward, but not utterly destroyed; “ for thus saitli the Lord God , although I have cast them far off among the heathen , and although I have scattered them among the countries , yet will I he to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come." (Chap. xi. 16.) Thus we are again brought back to the starting point, from the river Chebar ; from whence we are to look for the fourfold outgoings of Israel, as under the wings of God to every quarter of the world; and by the judgments manifested in their dispersion preparing the world for the final harvest, when the angels from the four quarters of the earth shall be sent forth with their sickles to reap the ripened fields, and bring the wheat, that is to say, all that is good, and with living power in it, the true Jezreel , the seed of God, unto the garner of heaven. In the vision the prophet was looking towards the north ; but he describes what he sees thus : “ As for the likeness of their faces, they had the face of a man and the face of a lion on the right side ; and they four had the face of an ox on the left side ; they four , also , had the face of an eagle." “ They turned not when they went , they went every one straight forward." The right side of the four divisions was towards the east, and in the direction they faced they went. If then, the Targum is correct in describing Judah’s division as symbolized by a lion and Reuben’s by a man, it fol- lows that the dispersion of those classed under these tribes, Judah, Issachar, Zebulun, and the one half tribe of Benjamin; Reuben, Simeon, Gad was to- THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 43 wards the west; and, for the same reason, it also follows that the four tribes symbolized by the ox, Ephraim, Manasseh, and the other half tribe of Ben- jamin, and those symbolized by the eagle, Dan, Asher, Naphtali, took their direction to the east. It is traditionally, and with good reason held that only some of the tribe of Judah, and a part of the tribe of Benjamin, were recognised as occupying Judea after the Babylonish captivity. Hence, we may fairly infer that the remnants of the other tribes who re- mained beyond the Euphrates were involved in what- ever influences led to the general dispersion of the children of Israel as distinct from those who, from dwelling in Judea, were afterwards called Jews; so that portions of all the tribes are not insignificantly represented as symbolically appearing under the forms of the four living creatures seen proceeding out of the midst of the whirlwind, the cloud, the fire, and the brightness of the prophet’s visions at the river Chebar. It is important to observe that, though Ezekiel was a prophet of Judah, he is expressly directed to “ set his face against the mountains of Israel and to pro- phecy against them ” (vi. 2). He is consulted both by the elders of Judah and the ancients of Israel. Throughout his prophecies he keeps distinctly before them the difference in their condition and prospects. To the elders of Judah he exhibits the cause of Jerusalem’s destruction (chaps, viii. ix. x. xi.); to the elders of Israel, as distinct from Judah (chaps, xiv.-xx.), he points out their iniquity, and says that God will not be inquired of by them through the 44 EZEKIEL’S VISION prophets, but that God will answer the house of Israel directly by Himself, without the intervention of a prophet (xiv. 7 ; xx. 3). There is remarkable stress laid on the peculiar abominations of the false prophets of Israel, who seduced the people by divining lies (xiii. 7), and promising peace concerning Jeru- salem, as if all Israel might expect deliverance because of the prosperity they foretold for the people of Judah. The symbol these false prophets employed to express their promises to the people was the erection of a “slight wall” (xiii. 10), which others “ daubed with untempered mortar,” as if to indicate their hope of restoration and of being built up together in their own land. But God, by the true prophet, says of the wall, “ I will rend it with a stormy wind in my fury — an overflowing shower in mine anger, and great hailstones in my fury ” (xiii. 13). This symbol of a slight wall of loose stones daubed with clay, as expressing the hopes of the false prophets, will throw some light upon usages to which reference will be made in future chapters of this volume. The contrast is between (Ezek. xiii. 10) a mere stone hedge and the wall of a city (xiii. 12); that is to be the defence of the rebellious Israel, this of the restored to Jerusalem. There are clear inti- mations throughout the prophecies of Ezekiel that there would be a new writing or record of the reunion of Israel as a whole ; but the deceived of both houses, Judah and Israel, would be excluded, “they shall not be in the secret [assembly] of my people, nor written in their writing [or register] of the house of Israel, nor enter into the land of Israel” (xiii. 9). THE LIGHT IN THE CLOUD. 45 Those who called themselves more especially Beni- Tsrael, the house of Israel, the whole house of Israel, those who were separated from Judah by the rebellion, are most frequently styled by the prophet the re- bellious house. He shows that a new Israel will be formed out of the pious of both parties who should be restored ultimately to the land of Israel. This he symbolizes by the two sticks (xxxvii. 16-19), one having written on it “ For Judah, with his com- panions of the children of Israel;” and, on the other, “ For Joseph, the stick of Ephraim, and for all the house of Israel his companions.” “ Thus saith the Lord God, Behold, I will take the stick of Joseph, which is in the hand of Ephraim, the tribes of Israel his fellows, and will put them with him, even the stick of Judah, and make them one stick, and they shall be one in my hand.” This seems to have been fulfilled in a measure by the restoration under Ezra and Nehemiah and Zerubbabel, though an ultimate greater restoration and reunion is still foretold. The idolatrous people of both Judah and the rebellious house of Israel called Joseph, Ephraim, and the tribes remained in the countries beyond the Euphrates; the rebels were purged out from those who were to enter into the land of Israel (xx. 38). “As for you, 0 house of Israel, thus saith the Lord God, Go ye, serve ye every one his idol, if ye will not hearken unto me ” (xx. 39). The judgments that are to come upon the rebels are summed up thus : “ I will take the house of Israel in their own heart;” “ I, the Lord, will answer every one by myself;” “I will set my face against that man [the idolater], I will make him a sign and 46 EZEKIEL’S VISION, ETC. a proverb, and will cut him off from the midst of my people;” “If the prophet be deceived ( rms' ) when he hath spoken a thing, I the Lord have deceived (\n\ns) that prophet; and I will stretch out my hand upon him ;” “ The punishment of the prophet shall be as the punishment of him who seeketh unto him ” (xiv. 5, 7, 8, 9, 10). We shall probably see the force of these words as we proceed. 47 CHAPTER II. ISRAEL’S PERVERSION, WARNING, AND RECOVERY. We have seen the beams of glory bursting from the cloud in the prophet’s vision; we have seen that Jehovah, in human manifestation, sits on his sapphire throne erected above the firmament of heaven and above the cherubim; we have seen the glory spread- ing from the icy regions of the terrible crystal to the torrid zone ; and we have seen that, however involved the ways of God to man may seem to be, yet the spheres and systems of all life, animal, human, or angelic, still run onward, in a path prepared, to an appointed end; and that, however devious from the course directed by the law of God may be the chosen determination of man’s will, yet all the discordances of man are harmonized by the Omnipotent, according to the wisdom of his own will. The cycles of time, the circuits alike of worlds and of ages, the move- ments of all intelligences, become involved in the universal Power in which all the agencies of heaven and of earth are working out the development of Divine order, and rolling on with all the worlds to the eternal revelation, when God shall be known as all in all, the Origin and the End of all existence. The general idea of the prophet’s vision seems to be, that 48 Israel’s perversion, the Spirit is everywhere, subduing the rebellious will of man by sure methods, however slow, to the ac- knowledgment of God’s goodness and perfection, and that to this end the watchfulness that never tires would have us look, in all our attempts to under- stand the mysteries of Providence ; but now especially as revealed in the history of Israel and of Judah. If we look a little into the details of Ezekiel’s addresses to the exiles by the river Chebar, we shall be better able to see where we should look for the outcast tribes at this time, and probably be better qualified to un- derstand other prophecies concerning them. We first find that they would not listen to the pro- phet (iii. 7), and then that he portrayed to them the destruction of Jerusalem, as if to show them the fruitlessness of hope from thence. After which, he tells them they should be driven out amongst the Gentiles to eat defiled bread, and that only a third part of them^should escape from the sword, the pesti- lence, and the famine that should pursue them (v. 12) ; but that, after the nations had witnessed the Divine judgments upon them, the remnant of them should be signally blessed and made a further evidence of the wisdom and goodness of the Divine government, by their recovery from idolatry and pollution to true faith and patience; and thus also become, by their example and their teaching, a blessing to the nations amongst whom they had been hidden and oppressed. (Ezek. vi. 9, 20, 40, 44.) It may be questioned whether the prophet spoke these things to the ba- nished Israelites in general. In the 7th chapter of his prophecy he seems to limit his threatening predic- WARNING, AND RECOVERY. 49 tions to a certain class of his countrymen, namely, the whole multitude of them who should not return (ver. 13) ; probably meaning those who should refuse, or not be permitted, to avail themselves of the oppor- tunities afforded to the Jews under Ezra and Nehe- miah to repeople their own land, and again build the walls of Jerusalem (ver. 13). When Hosea prophe- sied to the Israelites in Samaria, under the name of Ephraim, he told them that they should go into bondage similar to that their fathers experienced in Egypt; “ Ephraim shall be desolate in the day of rebuke among the tribes of Israel: 1 have made known that which shall surely be” (ver. 9). They sought help against Judah from the Assyrian king Jareb; there- fore that golden calf which the people of Israel wor- shipped in Bethaven shall be a present to king Jareb; and the king of Samaria “ shall be cut off as foam upon the waters.” “ Ephraim,” says God by Hosea (xi. 12), “ compasseth me about with lies, and Israel with deceit; but Judah yet ruleth with God, and is faithful with the saints.” There is divine tenderness in the upbraiding which the prophet ad- dresses to the Israelites concerning their persistence in the idolatry and great wickedness which necessitate their utter removal from the Holy Land. “When Israel was a child, then I loved him, and called my son out of Egypt. I taught Ephraim to walk, taking them by their arms. I drew them with cords of a man, with bands of love. He [Ephraim] shall not return into the land of Egypt, but the Assyrian shall be his king, because they shall refuse to return.” (Hos. ii. 1-5). This interchange of the singular and the plural E 50 ISRAEL’S PERVERSION, personal pronouns is common in speaking of a people as personified in the name of an individual. The point of the passage is this : those who boasted of being pecu- liarly Israelites, descended from Ephraim, the most highly blessed son of Joseph, might well be sent back to Egypt as a punishment for their worship of Baalim ; but, instead of that, they should become and remain subjects to the Assyrian, whose help they sought against Judah, because, or when, they shall refuse to return. Of those who escape from the sword, pes- tilence, and famine, it is said, they shall escape to the mountains like doves of the valleys , out of place and in sorrow. (Chap. vii. 16-22.) In answer to the be- wailing supplication of the prophet, Jehovah declares that He will not make a full end of Israel as a nation, notwithstanding their total removal. When the Assy- rian took the inhabitants of Samaria captive, and led the ichole of Israel away into bondage beyond the Euphrates, the Jews of Jerusalem, from whom they had been so much and so long divided by their reli- gious and political feuds, cried to them, upbraidingly, “ Get ye out far from the Lord , unto us is this land given." (Chap. xi. 16.) The Jews were fearfully tested afterwards, as to their fitness to possess the Holy Land. When the Prince of Peace came amongst them in the name of the Father, teach- ing salvation by words and signs and wonders, they saw about Him nothing of this world, the world they loved, and they cried out, “ His blood be upon us and upon our children .” The dispersed, the out- casts of Israel, had no voice in the rejection and cru- cifixion of Jesus. His miracles they never witnessed, WARNING, AND RECOVERY. 51 of his resurrection they never heard; and they resisted not the testimony of God against themselves when the Holy Spirit, as the witness of Christ’s as- cension to the right hand of God, to reign in the power of his risen life, was preached in many tongues kindled into lustrous utterance as by tire from Heaven. The Ten Tribes, though apostates, were not in a position thus to deny their Lord and Saviour, as Judah ultimately did ; so it appears from the prophecy that the remnants of Israel shall be converted first , and that they shall enjoy the blessings of the new cove- nant, while yet the dispersed of Judah shall be availing themselves of all the secular powers of the last days, to re-establish themselves in the land from whence their iniquities expelled them. It was when the whole house of Israel were bowed down in the miseries of banishment that the Jews taunted their brethren in the words above quoted (xi. 15); and it was then that the word of Jehovah came to Ezekiel, saying, “Al- though I have cast them far off among the heathen, and although I have scattered them among the countries, yet will I be to them as a little sanctuary in the countries where they shall come. Therefore say, Thus saith the Lord God, I even gather you from the people, and assemble you out of the countries where ye have been scattered, and will give you the land of Israel. And they shall come thither, and they shall take away all the detestable things thereof, and all the abomina- tions thereof, from thence. And I will give them one heart, and I will put a new spirit in you, and I will take the stony heart out of their flesh, and will give them an heart of flesh, that they may walk in my statutes, e 2 52 Israel’s perversion, and keep mine ordinances, and do them ; and they shall be my people, and I will be their God. But as for them whose heart walketh after their detestable things, and their abominations, I will recompense their way upon their own heads, saith the Lord God. Then did the cherubim lift up their wings and the wheels beside them; and the glory of the God of Israel was over them above. And the glory of the Lord went up from the midst of the city, and stood upon the mountain which is on the east side of the city. Afterwards, the Spirit took me up and brought me in vision, by the Spirit of God, into Chaldea, to them of the captivity ; so the vision I had seen went up from me. Then I spake unto them of the captivity all the things that the Lord had shewed me ” (ii. 16 - 25 ). In order to understand these words we must re- member that the prophet is addressing the people of Judah and Jerusalem concerning themselves, as well as the rebellious house of Israel ; hence the change of person in the address: “I have cast them off, yet* I will be to them as a little sanctuary amongst the hea- then, but I will re-assemble you after being scattered, and bring you into the land of Israel.” It was when the prophet had heard these words that he saw the cherubim lift up their wings, with the wheels beside them (the mercy and providence of God), and the glory of the God of Israel over them. Then the glory went forth from the city of Jerusalem, and stood on the mountain to the east of the city, that is, the Mount of Olives, from whence the Lord Jesus ascended into Heaven, and where the angels were WARNING, AND RECOVERY. 53 heard by the disciples to say : “ This same Jesus ivhich is taken up into heaven , shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven .” (Acts i. 11.) May we not with propriety conclude that this refer- ence to the Mount of Olives as the seat of the glory, or the last place on which it was seen, is intended to convey the idea that the Israelites should be truly restored in heart and spirit, by faith in Him who is the Resurrection and the Life; and who “has ascended up into heaven to receive gifts for men, for the re- bellious also, that the Lord God might dwell among them?” Immediately after the vision the prophet went into Chaldea, to tell the captives there also all the things that the Lord had shown him. (Chap. xi. 22-25.) He informs us what he said and did amongst the pro- phets, the princes, and the elders of Israel and Judah, in the land of exile. The elders of Israel obeyed him not, but preferred to worship Baal, the god of fire, and the calf in high places. Though they still pre- tended to reverence the name of Jehovah as the Supreme God, to whom the gods of the heathen were as servants, the place to which they desired to go was Bamah, the high place. Probably with a voluntary humility, like other worshippers of angels, they proudly professed to be too humble to address their prayers and open their hearts at once to Jehovah, though He had revealed Himself as the Father of all that truly honoured Him. They could come to the prophet indeed as to a mediator, or a medium of access to God, Jehovah, still; but that was not the way that the Holy One required to be honoured. 54 Israel’s perversion 1 , Obedience to his laws in life and practice, was the only appointed mode of approaching Him, and obtain' ing blessings. The elders of Israel still went up to worship on high places. Then said the prophet unto them, when they, in mock humility, came to inquire what they should do: u Are ye polluted after the manner of your fathers ? As Hive , saith the Lord God , I will not he inquired of by you [xx. 30, 31]. Neither shall it be as you think to be like the heathen , to serve wood and stone , but as I live , saith the Lord , surely with a mighty hand , and with a stretched out arm , and with fury poured out , will L rule over you. L will bring you into the wilderness of the people; and there will L plead ivith you , face to face , as L pleaded with your fathers in the wilderness of the land of Egypt. I will cause you to pass under the rod [ like counted sheep f and L will bring you into the bond of the covenant" [xx. 29-39]. The address of Ezekiel to the elders of Israel in this chapter (20th) is a recapitulation of the mode of God’s dealings in grace and judgment with their fathers from the first. They are upbraided with their idolatry, and told the result. Their rebellion is charged upon them. The Author of life is represented as pledging Himself by his own life to accomplish his words, which are the more forcible from the fact that the Israelites were accustomed “ to swear by the sin of Samaria, and say, Thy God, 0 Dan, liveth; and the manner of Beer- sheba liveth.” (Amos viii. 14.) As much as to say the golden calf there worshipped is as much a living God as Jehovah Himself. They are told that those who are purged from their idolatry shall be restored to the WARNING, AND RECOVERY. 55 Holy Land, and that the rebellious shall be cast out. This separation of the Israelites into two classes, one to return, and the other to be scattered, has been overlooked. Hence the prophecy has appeared pecu- liarly obscure, and even contradictory, since within a few verses a return is promised, and yet a thorough casting out and rejection is threatened. The point to which the reader’s particular attention is invited in connexion with our inquiry is this — a certain class of Israelites, and that a large one, is not to be restored to Palestine, and yet they are as a body to be removed from the place of their exile : “ I will purge out from among you the rebels , and them that transgress against me ; I will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn , and [or but] they shall not enter into the land of Israel" (ver. 38). Notwithstanding this, mercy accompanies the rebels. A devouring fire, an unquenchable flame, goes forth to burn all faces from the south to the north (ver. 47, 48). It is a purify- ing flame, a flame of Divine vengeance, a convincing process ; it is heavenly fire : “ All flesh shall see that I the Lord have kindled it ; it shall not be quenched Well might the prophet exclaim, at the end of his address, “ AA, Lord God ! they say of me , Doth he not speak parables ?” The same will be said of any one who sees and announces the Divine judgment in a Divine method. Do not the preceding statements express with sufficient plainness the fact that, when the remnant of Israel, scattered in lands but little known, the wilderness of the people ( Midbar Hdammim ), shall have lost sight of their original, the goodness of God 56 Israel’s perversion, shall in grace be abundantly fulfilled to them by their restoration through his correcting providence to a right state of heart? Daniel and Jeremiah appear to have foretold the gospel dispensation as that of the especial or holy covenant, and it is this into which the outcasts are to be ultimately brought when, feeling and acknowledging their evil dispositions, they re- nounce their own pretensions, forsake all idols, and from the heart obey the gospel.* The prophets testify of the history of Israel. Each prophet personifies God in relation to the peculiar people. Deity humanizes Himself to reason with them, to warn and to prognosticate. He puts Himself into all the human relationships which can best illus- trate His love for man as manifested through the chosen people. Thus Hosea puts Divinity before us as in his own person, and as acting the part of a loving husband to a deceitful and abominable wife. Israel is that wife; but the wife takes the name of the husband, and the true Israel is really represented by the prophet. Her proceedings and names symbo- lically indicate the history of Israel both at home and abroad, in Palestine and in other lands. The prophet represents himself as married to Gomer, the daughter of Diblaim (Hosea i. 3). Here, we conceive, Israel in its northern, or Scythian connexion is alluded to. It is the house of Israel as distinct from Judah that is represented as the adulterous wife by Hosea (i. 3). Why does he name her Gomer, * See Dan. ix. 27 ; xi. 22, 28, 30, 32 ; Jer. xxxi. 31 ; xxxiv. 18 ; Heb. viii. 8, 13; Ezek. xxxvii. 26; Heb. xiii. 20; Isai. xxx. 18,19; xlviii. xlix. The messenger of the covenant is the Messiah. (Mai. iii. 1.) WARNING, AND RECOVERY. 57 the daughter of Diblaim? It is an interesting fact that Gomer, as a. country, is identified with that of the Scythians by the ancients.* May not the representative marriage of Hosea with Gomer be prophetic not only of the peculiar apostacy of the house of Israel, but also of their association with the Scythians in that apostacy? If so, we have this additional ground for seeking Israel in Scythian con- nexion. According to the figure of the prophet, fulfilment of the holy bond is only on one side. Israel is unfaithful to God, but the unselfish love, the highest, the divine, the law-giving love, triumphs over all the defects of its unfaithful object. Forgive- ness, not indulgence, is the ground of the Divine conquest of fallen humanity. Detesting and punish- ing the wrong, the love goes on to evince its unfailing nature until it begets love like itself, and the heart of man and the heart of God beat, so to say, in unison. The whole scheme of the prophecy of Hosea is in the first chapter. The result of this nominal marriage with a people of false religions (whoredoms) is first a son called Jezreel (the seed of God), to signify the cessation of the kingdom of Israel, but yet the pre- servation of a godly race (ver. 4). Then a daughter named Lo-ruliamah ( not having obtained mercy ), is said to be born, because, as it appears, the people of Israel in their exile did not trust to God like Judah * Gomer signifies that which is fulfilled or thoroughly brought to pass. It is also the name of the sou of Japhet, from whom the Scythian nations are descended. Diblaim is a dual word, and signifies two (people) brought together by outward pressure ; it is a dual word, doubtless adopted by the prophet to express the fact by a verbal symbol. 58 Israel’s perversion, (ver. 7), but to armed power; therefore, says God, 11 1 will utterly take them away (ver. 6). Afterwards another offshoot arises, called Loammi (not my people), no longer recognised as Israel. Yet Israel is in number numberless, and where it was said, k ‘ Not my people, there they are called sons of the living God." To find Israel, the descendants of the rebel tribes, the Lo-ammi, in the latter day, we must look for the people which most readily and willingly received the Gospel, or are most ready to receive it, when properly presented to them. We must not forget that the predictions concerning the seed of Isaac, repeated and enlarged in the pro- phecies concerning the offspring of Joseph, are not fulfilled in anything that history has taught us in relation to the dispersed of Judah. Notwithstanding the direful defection of Israel, it is yet promised that in them shall all the families of the earth be blessed, that their seed shall yet be countless as the sea -side sands, and that where it was said “ Ye are not my people , there it shall be said , Ye are the sons of the living God." (Hosea i. 10.) Their way is indeed hedged up with thorns and enclosed as by a wall, but that is to the end that they should not be able to follow their own devices, but only the more remark* ably manifest the marvels of Divine Providence. When Jehovah reasons with them through the prophet, he addresses them under the figure of a faithless woman betrothed to him for ever, and yet by their idolatries behaving faithlessly; to be re- covered, however, at last, in righteousness and judg- ment, and lovingkindness, and tender mercies, and divine faithfulness, so that she should know and love WARNING, AND RECOVERY. 59 her Lord without the possibility of defection ever- more. (Hos. ii.) But the most striking part of the figure thus em- ployed by the prophet is most overlooked. In the review of Hosea’s prophecy, which is peculiarly ap- plied to Israel in distinction from Judah, it appears that the whole earth is remarkably interested in the recovery of the outcast people. Their perfect recovery is, in fact, the harvest of the world : “ I will sow her unto me in the earth” saith the prophet, in Jehovah’s name. Through the scattering of Israel, like wheat broadcast from the sower’s hand, the wide earth shall yield her increase. The day of Jezreel , the day of the seed of God , the day of judgment, the day of decision, the day of love, the day of God’s vengeance, that is the day in which Israel and Judah, now divided as if never more to meet, shall choose one head, and be indeed the visible sons of God. (Chap. i. 11.) Their restoration is the establishment of the final kingdom, an anastasis , as if of life from the dead, the actual regeneration, when that adoption shall be manifest for which the apostle of the Gentiles looked forward, “ to wit, the redemption of the body from the bondage of corruption, the manifestation of the sons, or seed, of God,” the true Jezreel. (Rom. viii. 23.) Then these words shall be fulfilled, “ It shall come to pass, saith the Lord, that I will hear the heavens, and the heavens shall hear the earth, and the earth shall hear the corn, and the wine, and the oil, and they shall hear Jezreel ,” the seed or sons of God. (Chap. ii. 20.) All shall then visibly operate after the Adamic order, the Divine plan of government, in which God rested in love and in blessing with man as the head of creation ; from the 60 Israel’s perversion, lowest ordinances of nature upwards to the highest offices of intelligence, all shall hang in conscious dependency on the Spirit, the Power, and the Presence of the Supreme, the only Lord whose best last name is Love, love manifested in perfect humanity. To quote all the passages in the Bible in which we find, or fancy we find, predictions of blessing to all the dwellers of earth through the literal descendants of Abraham, would be to transfer a large part of that wondrous book; for all the prophecies relate more or less to the history of that people, either in their dis- persion, consequent on their unbelief, or in their re- covery, through faith in their Redeemer. When God called Abram out of Ur of the Chaldeans, he made him the representative and federal head of a new dis- pensation, in which separation in heart and mind from all idolatries unto the worship of Jehovah, should be always accompanied by Divine favour and blessing. It was this going out from all the practices of idola- trous heathenism to seek a heavenly rest, a land of promise and immortality, in the devotion of his soul to the God who by his word fabricated the heavens and the earth, that distinguished Abraham, and, despite his infirmities, caused him to be designated “ the friend of God." Now it was to Abraham that the promise was made that he should be the father of many nations, and that in his seed all the families of the earth should be blessed. (Gen. xvii. 19, 20; xxi. 10.) It is to be observed that the promise was made under very unpromising circumstances, or, as St. Paul expresses it, a promise of life and blessing to proceed WARNING, AND RECOVERY. 61 from one as good as dead. (Heb. xi. 11-16.) All along, from the first to the last, from the time that Abraham was a childless wanderer to our age of Mam- monism, it has always appeared a most unlikely thing that the whole world should be blessed through and in the seed of Isaac, for, as Tacitus says, “ The Jews of all nations are held the vilest.” (Book v. 8.) The land of Canaan was the seat of the worst forms of idolatry, and consequently of the most hideous vices. This land was punished by Israel as the hand of Jehovah, and occupied by the Hebrews in fulfilment of the promise made to Abraham ; nevertheless, for their idolatries, the chosen people were themselves cast out. The land was given as an everlasting pos- session on terms which they neglected. But the co- venant of God still stands on His part sure, and the central land shall be again and for ever the dwelling of the faithful seed of Israel, whence the whole earth shall be filled with praise. But where is the select seed now ? Scattered we know not where. And yet Jehovah said, “ I will sow them in the earth the seed of Isaac shall spring up countless as the sea-side sands. Has not the word of prophecy been fulfilled ? Probably many will say that the language of the prophecy is to be understood with a large poetic licence, or in a spiritual manner. Pro- phecy with a limitless licence might answer amongst the believers in the Sibylline leaves, but it will not serve the purpose of those who place their faith in a positive, plain-speaking God. Believers in the Bible take that book to be God’s truth because it does not allow us to exercise the craft and cunning of imagi- O O 62 Israel’s perversion, nation in the invention, or in the interpretation, of either its facts or the doctrines connected with them. What Jehovah means He says and does, and that both as a Creator and a Saviour; and it is the coin- cidence between the truths of creation and history, with the truths of salvation, that renders the Bible, in its old and new covenants, a trustworthy book. It agrees alike with man and man’s world. If, then, the book is to be consistent in all respects, as it ap- pears to be in so many, we may expect a literal ful- filment of the prophecies concerning the seed of Isaac, and the blessing of the world in his name. Does it appear that the Jews, as they now stand, in any degree represent a fulfilment of the promises? We trow not. Are they hereafter to possess and bless all lands? If they do, surely it will not be as Jews, unless Judaism is to supplant Christianity, and tram- ple down the Saxon race, with their New Testament, the Gospel and its comments, in the Epistles and the Apocalypse. Amongst the earliest prophecies there is one pre- eminent, which perhaps may afford a clue to others. When Jacob blessed his grandsons Ephraim and Manasseh, he designedly and significantly crossed his hands, so that, contrary to custom, the right hand rested on the head of the younger, and the left on that of the elder. Joseph would have corrected the supposed mistake; but the devout and blind old grandfather said: “/ knoiv, I know , my son. Manasseh shall he great , hut truly his younger brother shall he greater. The angel which redeemed me from all evil bless the lads ! and let my name he named upon them , WARNING, AND RECOVERY. 63 and the name of my fathers Abraham and Isaac , and- let them grow into a multitude in the midst of the earth." (Gen. xlviii. 16.) The promises of overflowing blessings on the house of Joseph and his children have not been fulfilled in anything that history has yet brought to our knowledge concerning the Jews. They have not become a multitude of nations yet, nor are all lands blessed by them, nor are they blessed themselves. If the prophecy be fulfilled, there must be another people hidden, yet vastly diffused, in whom it is fulfilled. Where is the tribe of Ephraim? Certainly not known on the exchange by that name, nor in the name of Jacob, nor of Abraham, nor of Isaac, as far as we can ascertain. The prophecy was not fulfilled in Palestine, nor is it now in the course of fulfilment amongst the Jews ; and yet, if the times of the Gentiles are nearly completed, as all the signs of the times distinctly indicate, then we must believe the prophecy fulfilled in some manner yet to be discovered. The vulgar starers after glaring 1 wonders will never see prophecy converted into fact ; but those will who watch the Hand that works silently. By the insertion of one seed vitalized by His touch God filled the whole earth with the highest forms of life and adoration. The word of God un- folds itself like life, ever expanding and never seen but by the seers of the Spirit as well as the letter. Look at the Jews. The promises made to Isaac indeed embraced the Jews, but the promises to the children of Joseph extend beyond them. The tribe of Ephraim belonged to that division of the Hebrew people who remained amongst the idolaters when the 64 Israel’s perversion, captivity was relaxed by the decree of C)TUS. Ephraim is especially mentioned by the prophets, and the words of Hosea are peculiarly strong concerning the estrangement of this tribe : “ Ephraim is joined to idols; let him alone ” (chap. iv. 15, 16, 17); and it appears that Ephraim was so prominent a leader in idolatrous innovations, as that the name stood in that respect as the representative of the whole of the house of Israel, as we find in that divinely tender address: u O Ephraim , what shall I do unto thee ?' ’ (Chap. vi. 4.) “ There is idolatry in Ephraim — Israel is dejiled." Observe the result. Ephraim is mixed with the peoples (vii. 8). Because he made many altars to sin, altars shall be to him to sin; and through his idolatry Israel is swallowed up among the Gentiles as a vessel in which is no pleasure (viii. 8) ; like an un- clean and broken urn cast into the sea as worse than useless. He forgot his Maker, and yet built temples. In consequence of this attempt to do God service by flattering their own vanity, the very people who deemed themselves the peculiar inheritors of divine blessings are now outcasts alike from their fatherland and their fathers’ hopes. They have forgotten all their traditions of Jehovah’s covenant with their fathers, they are to know themselves as utterly desolate and hopeless, incapable of recovery but through a mani- festation of grace of which they have no record. Speaking of Ephraim and Israel as one, the prophet Hosea says : “ My God shall cast them away, and they shall wander among the nations.” (Chap. ix. 17.) 'Thus confirming and repeating the prophecy of Y_ WARNING, AND RECOVERY. 65 Moses, who, foreseeing the disobedience of Israel, said to them all : “ The Lord shall scatter thee among all people from one end of the earth even unto the other." (Deut. xxviii. 64.) Nevertheless, the end of their wanderings is this : u Ephraim shall say, What have I to do any more with idols ? I have heard him and j observed him saying , I am like a green fir-tree. From me is thy fruit found. Who is wise , and he shall understand these things ? prudent , and he shall know them V' (Hos. xiv. 8, 9.) u 0 Israel, thou hast destroyed thyself: but in me is thine help. The iniquity of Ephraim is bound up, his sin is hid. I will ransom them from the power of the grave ! I will redeem them from death. 0 death, I will be thy plagues. 0 grave , I will be thy destruction .” (Hos. xiii. 9-14.) We must- look then for the fulfilment of these prophecies among a people not known as Israelites, and who can be recovered from the degradation of their habits and position only by that operation of the Holy Spirit which causes a belief in the resurrection, and raises the soul from death by the word of Christ. We must look for the descendants of the literal Israel amongst those who now are, or are ready to become, the spiritual Israel ; in short, among Christian nations, and among those who are willing to receive the word of God, the truth as it is in Jesus, as soon as they shall have it fairly presented to them. We will proceed in our endeavours to substantiate this conclusion by examination of the history and the existing facts of the world, as far as we can trace their connexion with Israel. But there is one point in the prophecy most striking in connexion with the F A 66 Israel’s perversion, warning, and recovery. grand revolution now proceeding in the East, the greatest that ever happened. It is this : when Ephraim, or the outcast house of Israel, is beginning to be recovered, he awakes, so to say, with the ques- tion, “ What have I to do any more with idols ?” Thus indicating that, up to the moment of the sudden change, these hidden Israelites are idolaters, but throw their idols off in haste and altogether, just as the old races in China now do, and as those of India will ere long. This is only an illustration, an argu- ment, and an inference may be connected with the fact by and bye — “ A nation shall he horn in a day." All times and all means spring from one source and terminate in one end, the manifestation of the Divine Being, the revelation of the Author and Finisher of life. Such, at least, is one of the grand lessons we shall learn by contemplating the facts to which our inquiry now conducts us, and it is itself worth our patience. 67 l CHAPTER III. HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? Haying arrived at the conclusion that the prophet’s- symbolic vision signifies the scattering of the re-' bellious Israelites and Jews through the wide world, in proof alike of judgment and of mercy, we pro- ceed to inquire by what instrumentality this was effected. It has been intimated that they were to be involved in the cloud and the whirlwind, and mixed up with a vast multitude of people in the north ; from whence they are to be borne, as on the wings of the wind, unto every part of the habitable globe. How they were thus involved and scattered we have no certain evidence to inform us; but we shall discover much reason for the inference that they voluntarily, as a body, went forth from the place of their exile into the land offering them the asylum and the liberty they desired. They refused to listen to the prophet’s warning; God rejected them, and we know that they did not and could not return to Palestine. They who were of the Ten Tribes had altogether separated themselves from the Jews as a body by apostacy and relentless warfare against the house of David; and, had they desired again to occupy Samaria, that land could not receive them — it was f 2 68 HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? filled by a people who had been placed there by the Assyrian monarch in exchange for themselves. There was, therefore, no room for them in their own former country, had they been inclined or permitted to re- turn. They were completely outcasts; they were rejected alike of God and their country. An invasion of the land of Media and Mesopotamia, through some of the most fertile provinces of which they appear to have been scattered, might indeed have facilitated their escape. A foe to their oppressors would have been a friend to them, and one mighty enough to meditate and effect such an invasion would probably have promoted their rebellion, encouraged their band- in' 1, together, and have hailed them as the best auxi- liaries. But we find nothing distinct enough in the history of those countries and those times to afford us any proof that they were drawn into the northern whirlwind and the cloud by such means. It is at least most probable that, if they left the place of their exile at all, they Avent out in peace, still deceiving themselves with hopes to which they had no title, since they had forsaken the covenant with the house of David, in which “ the sure mercies ” promised by Jehovah were alone to be found. But, if they could leave the place of their exile peaceably, it is evident that the power of their oppressors must have been previously subdued by some other power which proved itself friendly to themselves. That power we believe to have been Scythian, since this was the only invading force of which we have any information that Leonid in any degree fulfil the requirements of the vision of a whirlwind and a cloud coming from the HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? 69 north and involving the captives of Israel who so- journed in Media and Mesopotamia, and by the banks of the Tigris and the Euphrates. We shall present evidences of the connexion of the Israelites with this northern power as we advance in our inquiry. But, in order more fully to understand the condition of the revolted tribes, and of such of the tribes of Judah and Benjamin as were seduced by them after their removal from the Assyrian and Persian dominion, we must revert to the words of prophecy, which show us that theirs was a condition resulting from their wilfulness and obduracy of heart in choosing a reli- gion for themselves in keeping with their temper of mind. Instead of receiving and obeying the religious ordinances which had been enjoined upon them, they only ostensibly reverenced them as oracles to be in- terpreted according to their liking and convenience, just as the heathen interpreted the utterances of their Sibyls. — In the second book of Esinas- (©hap. xiii.) it is said that the Ten Tribes went Wth under circumstances peculiarly favourable. “The Most High showed-"' signs for them, and held still the flood until they were passed over.” It is stated that “ they, entered into [passed?] Euphrates by the narrow passages of the^-riyer.” If we look into a map, we shall see that such a course would lead them through Armenia, northward, into the midst of nations of Scythian origin. We may take this evidence as so far indi- cating what Jews believed concerning the Ten Tribes at a very early period. Since Esdras, however, is apocryphal, we ask what other indication is there that 70 HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? the Ten Tribes ever had an opportunity of withdraw- ing from the place of their exile? And, supposing them to have thus withdrawn, where were they likely to go? The record of the Scythian invasion of Media and Mesopotamia will afford us the reply. The Scythians once occupied those countries under cir- cumstances in which the Israelites were very probably greatly favoured. As alike enemies of Persia and Assyria, it was natural for the Scythians and the Israelites to seek to be on good terms with each other. But the history of the Scythians is remark- ably involved and obscure. It may be that this very obscurity concerning a people with whom the Israelites must have had association is one of the peculiar providences by which the path of the wan- dering tribes has been concealed. Notwithstanding tliis obscurity, traces of the Ten Tribes are found amongst the Scythians to the east of the Cas pian Sea , in Sogdiana, Bactriana, Independent Tartary, and Bokhara, and, indeed, amongst all people shown by history or language ever to have had any connexion with that part of the world. There was a bond of sympathy between the Scythians and the Israelites. Their foes were the same. Scythia was doubtless open to the sons of bondage whenever they could avail themselves of an opportunity to escape. Why should they not seek refuge in the land of freedom? Jewish historians, perhaps confounding the captivity with the after diffusion of the Jews, relate that the Ten Tribes were carried not only into Media and Persia, but also into countries north of the Bos- phorus. Ortelius also speaks of them as being in HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? 71 Tailary. We may then deem it probable at least that the Israelites iir Media were in correspondence with the Scythians, and this would go far to account for the attack of those people upon Assyria, as well as for the remarkable fact that, in their vast in- cursion, they went to the borders of the Hebrew country, but then turned aside, as if to avoid disturb- ing the sacred land, at that time unprotected, except by Providence. We have the evidence of Hei^dotjis as to the singular fact, that the Scythians were bent upon invading k)gypt, but were diverted from their purpose by large presents from the Egyptian king Psammetichus. They are said, however, to have robbed the temple of A seal on on their return, and to have been afflicted with some strange malady in con- sequence. (Clio. 104.) But are there any people with a name in any degree indicating the connexion of the house of Israel with that of the Scythian? Yes; we find the SqjUE placed by Ptolemy beside the Massagetse, and the very name Saow. suggests the possibility that the sons of Imac , as the Israelites delighted to call them-^ selves, became, in fact, the neighbours of those vic- torious Scythians, the Massagetae, and blended with them, or became allies, in their eventful wars with all the nations around them. Yor is it without some probability that the Scythians, who overran Asia for twenty-eight years, were themselves led on by the Israelites, if, indeed, the great body of them were not of Hebrew origin. This would account for their being first found in Media and Mesopotamia. These very Scythians were afterwards all called Sa&es- by 72 HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? the Persians. Their incursion took place in the reign of Cyaxares, son of Phraotes, king of Media. The Nebuchadnezzar who took Jerusalem married the daughter of this Cyaxares of Media.* When this king Cyaxares was in revolt against Assyria, and while in the very act of besieging Nineveh, with the aid of the Babylonians, these so-called Scythians came down upon these besiegers, overpowered them, and seized the empire of Asia, which, as we have said, they retained for twenty-eight years, (b.c. 641.) The especial fact to be observed is this, the Scythians and Sac® were afterwards confounded together. These overpowering hosts came through Media and Mesopotamia, where the vast multitudes of exiled Israelites had been located, and growing into power for more than a hundred years. The Asiatic domi- nion was ultimately recovered for the Medes and Persians under Cyrus the Great. Thus the way was prepared for the restoration of the Jews, the tribes of Judah and Benjamin, according to prophecy, while we hear nothing of the house of Ephraim or Israel. Where, then, were they? There is one great event in the history of Cyrus that may throw some light on the subject. This king was desirous of conquering the Massagetae. He went into their country, and, while there, dreamt that Darius had subdued Asia and Europe. This occurred on the banks of the Araxes. (Herod, i. 209.) Now we must remember that it was to the borders of this river, which is the same as Kir, that Tiglath-Pileser deported the people of Da- mascus when he subdued Syria, (b.c. 740. — 2 Kings * Dr. Angus’s Chronology, Bible Hand-book, p. 536. HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? 73 xvi. 9.) These people, therefore, were amongst the Massagetae who defeated Cyrus, and they had been formerly friends and allies of the Israelites, and spake the same or a similar language. It is probable, there- fore, that the Ten Tribes afterwards passed into that country, if in united bodies they went out from Media and Mesopotamia. We shall find proof here- after that the Israelites, the Sac® and the Getae, or Gothi, are ultimately blended together in some of their migrations. Names, dates, and events are involved in too great a confusion in the histories of those countries and times to be now unravelled, so we must content our- selves with the light we possess, and follow it to the best of our ability as far as it will lead us. We only gather up hints as we go on at present. We have imagined some reasons for supposing the Scythian Sacte to be connected with the house of Isaac; but we shall find other and stronger reasons as we pro- ceed to investigate the subject in the higher and clearer light of prophecy. In this place, however, a sketch of the kings and chronology of Assyria, in relation to the Israelites and the Jews, will aid us in forming a clearer idea of the statements already made. Pul, or Phul, is the first Assyrian king mentioned in Scripture. As he gave his kingdom to Tiglath- Pileser, they are associated together. Pul made the Israelites pay tribute to him in 769 b.c. He also probably deported some of the people; at least the captivity of Reuben, Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh is attributed to him as well as to Tiglath- 74 HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? Pileser in 1 Chron. v. 26. These tribes were removed Jrf Halah, Habor, Hara, and Gozan. Habor is supposed by some to be the same as Chebar ; Hara was the mountainous country of Media^and Gozan probably the district now known as Buhtan. If Habor be the same as Chebar, now Khabur, we have the fact that some of the Israelites deported by _Pul were located where others of their tribes were afterwards located by Tiglath-Pileser. There Ezekiel the prophet addressed their elders and beheld his vision. The people dwelling by the Chebar are named Siicki (Soki or Saaki) in the Assyrian records translated by Rawlinson.* This name might well be applied to the Israelites, either by themselves or their masters, whether we suppose the name de- rived from "fitf or from *jn^. In the first case it would mean a people poured from one place into another; and in the second it would be but the appropriate patronymic, in short, which Amos ap- plies to them, namely, sons of Isaac — hence, perhaps, Sakhi= Saxons. Tiglath-Pileser was invited by Ahaz, king of Judah, to assist him against Pekah, the king of Israel, who, with the aid of the Syrians, endeavoured to expel the descendants of David from the throne of Jerusalem.f Tiglath-Pileser on this occasion sub- dued Syria, and brought the whole of the country of Gilead and Kaphtali, east of the Jordan, under his dominion, leaving only Samaria to the kingdom of Israel. He sent his prisoners into Assyria, or, as * See note to Herodotus, f 2 Kings xvi. 7-9. HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? 75 some think, the county on the banks of the Kir, a branch of the Afax.es which flows into the Caspian Sea, in lat. 39° N. This was about 7.40 b.c. This king of Nineveh was master of Media, Armenia, Kur- distan, SyHa, and the northern parts of Palestine. Amos foretold this captivity : “ I will break also the bar of Damascus, and the people of §yria shall go into captivity into Kir, saith the Lord.” (Amos i. 5.) Shalnymeser, named Shalman by Hosea, led an army against the kingdom of Israel, which was now confined to the narrow limits of Samaria. He com- pletely subdued the Ten Tribes, and removed 27,280* families from Samaria at once into Halah, Habor, Gozan, and the cities of the Medes. It ap^ pears that his death for a short time suspended the removal of the rest of the Israelites. This was about 725 B.c. We observe that the Israelites, on this occasion, were exiled to the same parts of the empire of Assyria as those transported by Pul and Tiglath- Pileser; the cities of the Medes being also now mentioned, though some authorities have it that, at the time the Ten Tribes were carried to Assyria, the Medes had revolted, and Babylonia was a separate kingdom. But this occurred seven years from the building of Rome, in the second year of the eighth Olympiad, 748 B.c.f Sennacherib, or Jareb,^ succeeded Salmaneser b.c. # See Rawlinson’s translation of Assyrian records. — Athenaeum, Aug. 23, 1851. f Diod. Sic. lib. ii. Justin, lib. i. c. iii. 76 HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? 720. He completed the removal of the Israelites, brought the whole of Galilee and Samaria under his dominion, and then sent an army of 180,000 men against Hezekiah, king of Judah. But, in consequence of the faith and prayer of this king, this vast army was utterly destroyed by the angel of God beneath the walls of Jerusalem.* After this the Assyrian empire began to decline and that of Babylon to in- crease. Hence we learn, in the story of Tobit, who resided in Nineveh, that the overthrow of Nineveh was anticipated by the Israelites. He exhorts his son to leave that place, f and to go into Media, where the Israelites dwelt. It was under Nebuchadnezzar (605 b.c.) that Babylon dominated over all the East. During his reign the Chaldeans marched upon Jerusalem and carried away a large number of Jewish nobles into Babylon; among whom were Daniel and his friends-! This deportation of Jews was very different from that of the Israelites, and at least a hundred years subsequent. The return of the Jews took place after Cyrus had united the kingdoms of Media, Persia, and Babylon, and it is likely that he gave the Jews authority to rebuild their temple in Jerusalem in consequence of their aid in the conquest of Babylon. In the restoration of the Jews as related by Ezra and Nehemiah we hear nothing of the Ten Tribes; and the reason for this may be found in the entire * 2 Kings xix. Herodotus, lib. i. 1. f Tobit xiv. 4, 10-15, Rollin, lib. iii. c. ii. + Jer. xxiv. 5; xxv. 12; Ezek. xii. 13; Dan. i. 1, 2; Athenaeus, lib. xii. now AND WHERE DID THEY GO? 77 apostacy of Israel, and in the circumstance of their separation from the Jews, and also in the events that had occurred in the countries to which they were banished. It was the chiefs of Judah and B enjam in that promoted the return as stated by Ezra (i. 5). These were assisted by the priests and Levites. Some remnants of the house of Israel who Avere willing to submit to the new order of things appear to be named by Ezra (x. 25.) as all that were recog- nised. The circumstances that must have tended to pro- duce a permanent separation between the Ten Tribes and the Jews, or men of Judah and Benjamin, are numerous; but perhaps the most remarkable are the great changes that took place in the relations between Media, Nineveh, Babylon, and Israel during the interval between the reign of Sennacherib and that of Nebuchadnezzar; in which period the Ten Tribes must have been entirely dissociated from all their brethren in Palestine, and liable to all the abuses which opposing tyrannies could exercise over an op- pressed, a captive, and a homeless people. Esarhaddon, the third son of Sennacherib, took Babylon, and reigned over it, together with Nineveh, in 680 b.c. In this change the people of the tribes must have been involved. From 667 b.c. Sardochus reigned over Nineveh, Babylon, and Israel for twenty years, and over Media also, until that country re- / volted, which happened in the thirteenth year of his reign (654 b.c.). All these changes no doubt greatly influenced the position of the Ten Tribes in Assyria and Media. The revolt of Media was very likely 78 HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? indeed to have been much assisted by the presence in its cities of multitudes of Israelites, men famous for stratagem and the restlessness of tried bravery and fanaticism. But the most marked change in the position of these people, who, from their religious prejudices, would still endeavour to keep themselves distinct, probably occurred when the hardy Scythians came down from the north and trampled under them alike the despotisms of Media and Assyria (b.c. 633). The Median empire at that time contained, besides Media- Magna and Media- Atropatene, Persia, Assyria, Armenia, and Cappadocia.* They occupied Media, Mesopotamia, and great part of Assyria immediately after the revolt of Media, and while civil war was raging between Nineveh and Babylon. The Scythians, occu- pied, in fact, the very provinces in which the Ten Tiihfs dwelt, and from whence they overran the whole of Asia as far as Egypt on the south and the Indus on the east. May we not, then, regard this incursion as that predicted in the vision of Ezekiel under the image of a whirlwind and a cloud from the north? It alone, of all events in the history of those countries, fulfils the requirements of the prophet’s vision. This vast and marvellous invasion of rugged hosts seems to have as completely altered the aspect of central Asia at that time as did that of a kindred people under Alaric the Goth change the destinies of Romanized Europe. The Hand Divine guided the cloud; in all its seemingly lawless evolutions is seen “ the fire unfolding itself,” and the self-moving Spirit rules in all the rollings of the whirlwind. * Rawlinson’s Herodotus, vol. i. p. 373. HOW AND WHERE DID THEY GO? ?9 The facts about to be presented will probably justify the inference that the overflowing of these Scythians from the steppes of Tartary led to the ulti- mate removal of the Israelites, as a body, from Media, Mesopotamia, and Assyria into the land of the Tartars; and thence into all parts of the habitable globe, ac- cording to the literal force of the prophecies ad- dressed to Israel, and now proclaimed to the whole world, that men may everywhere look for their fulfil- ment, and understand that the destinies of nations and of men are determined by their obedience to the laws of uprightness, truth, and justice, or of the charities of earthly life under the kindred but higher charities revealed from heaven. Into the considera- tion of this world-wide dispersion of Israel it is not now my purpose to enter. Enough for my present purpose will be found in a very limited department of this inquiry, and I shall confine attention in this work to such evidences as we may be able to discover of the connexion of Israel, under another name, alike with Scythia, India, and England. a pa-* oy i etfj (tcHJXv j- Qjj ^ 2 r^a ( WwtT4 80 CHAPTER IV. THE HEBREW INFLUENCE AND THE SAXON RACE. However infidels may cavil and sneer at the oldest book in the world, they have the facts in connexion with it to account for, which the truth of that book alone explains. The people who wrote the Bible and transmitted it to us have altered the whole aspect of politics and religion; they have remodelled the world, and that, without intending anything more than to express their own convictions. Their faith has cast mountains into the sea. The contemptible people, as the Grecians and Romans called the Hebrews, have turned the pillaged temples of Athens and the Eternal City into dust, to be blown away into oblivion by the breath of Time. The names of old heroes once, worshipped there, now serve for little but to round the nonsense verses of our schools; the philosophers who haunted the porticoes of temples and the groves of uiie ac demies in long garments, uttering their proud attempts at wisdom with the gravity and mysterious- ness of that miserable ignorance of God and of them- selves which all their most oracular discourses ' * expressed ; — these, with all their honours, give place in silence to the dauntless prophets of Jehovah and HEBREW INFLUENCE AND THE SAXON RACE. 81 the ruder disciples of the holy Jesus. There is the fact — philosophy without the Bible has done nothing to improve the moral world as yet. The seed of Abraham — the man who so long ago strangely sepa- rated himself and his family from the pantheists of old Asia in order to assert faith and to worship a personal and a speaking God, the God manifest in humanity — have by their books and their ideas altered the habits of the whole civilized world, and now regulate, or will soon regulate, the intercourse of nations in all that relates alike to commerce, religion, and law. The man who was called “ the Friend of God ” is acknowledged by Europe, Asia, and America, and by multitudes in Africa also, as the father of the faithful, thus pro- fessing to be the true seed of Abraham in spirit, just so far as they obey the God who called him to seek for a country beyond this world. What if those Christian nations that profess the faith of Abraham as the proper pattern of their own should not only be spiritually his descendants by faith, so far as they possess it, but be even bodily influenced by an infu- sion of his blood through the scattering of his lineal descendants, the tribes of Israel, lost amongst the Gentiles? But, if not so, they have at least received the Wo H of life from the children of Abraham, and t . peopie thus ostensibly his seed are the models of humanity. In their records we possess the highest examples of all that is most ennobling in our nature, because there we see man influenced by the highest motives, and enabled, by the apprehension of divine relationship, in all their efforts to aim at the honour G 82 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE of Him who is “ glorious in holiness , fearful in praises , doing wonders Disregarding for a moment the Jewish mission to the Gentiles at all times of their history, but especially the Apostolic ministry in all lands with the Gospel of the crucified King of the Jews in their hands, the presence of the dispersed of Judah among us is suffi- cient to remind us of our indebtedness to them as men teaching us a grand lesson of the deepest in- terest. We see in their origin and history more of the use of history than in that of all the world besides; for in that we see the direct connexion of national and individual well-being with obedience to God’s laws. Here is the secret of Providence. To know God in the abstract is impossible. He reveals Him- self relativel} T , that is, in good and in evil. Man must study these in relation to the outward worlds of creation and history, and also in his own soul. He is to distinguish good from evil, to feel the beauty of holiness, and love that beauty. To appreciate the character of the j ust God, and to imitate Him who is manifested as the Saviour in whom righteousness and love are united, are spiritual duties now. These are * The literal Jews are a wonderful people, even in respect to their physique. They resist the causes of disease and death better than most people. According to the investigations of Dr. Gaiter, of Wieselburg, the mean life of Jews is 45’5 years ; of Germans in general, 267 ; of Croats, 20'2. He ascribes the difference altogether to the influence of race. Out of a thousand Christians at Frankfort, 39 reach 70 years, while of the same number of Jews 73 attain that age. This is the more remarkable, since Jews intermarry so much amongst themselves ; for Dr. S. M. Bemis shows that, of 6321 marriages between cousins in Kentucky, 3677 produced in- firm children— 1116 deaf and dumb, 468 born blind, 1854 idiots, and 239 scrofulous. — Ranking’s Med. Obs., vol. xxix. arts. 6 and 7. AND THE SAXON RACE. 83 the purposes of revelation and faith ; and all specula- tion that takes the mind away from contemplating these truths confounds, distresses, and destroys us. With this form of revelation the whole course of Providence coincides. But the plainest evidence remaining for us of the connected history and in- terests of human nature is found in the Bible and in the history of the Israelites; not only as recorded in their books, but as now visible in the effects of their dispersion and their presence in all civilized lands. The Jews at least cannot but testify to their past history; they cannot but point to Jerusalem; they cannot but appeal to their laws; they cannot but quote their prophets; they cannot but sing the songs of Zion; they cannot but lament in the language of Jeremiah ; they cannot but indicate their hopes, and, while testifying alike of judgment and of mercy, they cannot but thus direct the eyes of all thinking in- quirers to the Jews’ future as the only future fore- told with any sign of promise worth having. The Hebrews’ past has involved the well-being of the nations with whom they have mixed, and so will it be with their future. How marvellous their story ! How blended with the destinies of empires ! Egypt and Babylon, and Assyria and Rome have meddled with them and come to ruin, because they dealt with them unrighteously. And there is a controversy still pending with the Russian, the Mahometan, and Roman Catholic empires, as also with the Persian, the Mogul, the Chinese, the Burmese, and the Indian empires in connexion with their past conduct towards the outcasts of Israel. The history of the world, as G 2 84 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE God’s and man’s world, is the history of the Hebrews. And if the British empire and the republics of the Western hemisphere be not ruinously involved in the approaching and universal struggle, it is because of their better standing in relation to the Jews in con- sequence of receiving the Word that went out from Jerusalem. Those nations which submit by choice to the Word that smote down with violence the re- sisting Caesars now own the kindred of their Saviour, and acknowledge their obligation to the Jews for having conveyed to them the models of the wisest constitutions, and taught them to look before and after, to trace the meaning of God’s handwriting con- cerning the origin and ultimatum of our race. Thank God, the influence of Jewish history and prophecy is deeper in our literature and habits of thinking than is the influence of Jewish Mammonism on our money markets. The purpose of both these eflfects is to be seen yet, and that probably soon. If, without the consent of Jews as money dealers, the nations cannot fight, so neither can those nations that adhere to the Bible be much troubled by the contentions that arise about the Greek, Armenian, and Romish churches as represented at Jerusalem by idolatries that are there the proper derision of the Moslems and the scandal of true Christians, and an abomination in the eyes of those very Jews who look upon the whole land in which the objects of contention stand as their own inheritance. Through the favour of the God whom they still worship, and through whose interference they rightfully expect to be ere long reinstated, they still ply every art at their command to accomplish AND THE SAXON RACE. 85 the encl they desire, that is to say, the destruction of all those powers who pretend to any authority in the land of their fathers. The Holy Land is prepared to receive them back. These points are full of interest at the present turbulent and maturing and finishing period of history; but the largest element in the world’s present condition is unknown, and therefore it cannot be taken into the calculation concerning coming events. We do not know how the ten out- cast tribes of Israel, to whom so much of unfulfilled prophecy belongs, now stand in relation to the other peoples. They are only hidden, however, not lost. Not a seed is to fall to the ground in the winnowing process. And if it is difficult to find them as a separate people, or to discover where they are, if mixed up with others, yet it cannot remain for ever impossible, since the world is to see the light that shall arise upon them. (Isaiah lx.) We are already well informed by trustworthy his- tory that only a portion of the Hebrews who were carried captive into Assyria and its provinces returned to Palestine. All attempts to account for the re- mainder are unsatisfactory. Probably the most plausible attempt to find their locality is that of Dr. Grant, who, being a missionary among the Nestorian Christians, occupying many of the hills of the country over which the Israelites were probably dispersed by their conquerors, has arrived at the conclusion that these Nestorian Christians are the descendants of the Ten Tribes, and that the Scriptures are fulfilled by their discovery and conversion. But if Dr. Grant’s views do not come up to the terms of the prophecies 86 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE concerning Israel, to which we have in a former chapter directed attention, it will be unnecessary to follow his several arguments in order to expose their fallacy. What Dr. Grant wished to prove, of course, under the circumstances, became very evident to him- self; but he has not shown that the Nestorians are numerous, nor that they are “ swallowed up as an empty vessel amongst the nations .” (Hos. viii. 8.) The Nestorians are very probably descendants of the few Israelites who did not leave the land of their captivity ; this small remnant were distinguished in the early ages of Christianity, that is, the sixth and seventh centuries, in a most marvellous manner, by their sending out Christian missions to the east and the north, the traces of which still remain to a remark- able extent among the Chinese, the Tartars, and pro- bably more southern nations in the Eastern hemi- sphere. We have in general but a small conception of the influence that early Christians, through converted Israelites, exerted over the views of the heathen world. It is at least a noteworthy fact that the early Syrian churches have left visible evidence of their mis- sionary zeal and power, both in China and in India. Those early Syrian churches were Nestorians, and, in as far as the modern Kcstorians afford strong evi- dence. of their Isra elitish descent, as well as of their actual connexion with the early Syrian churches, so called, it is probable that their missionary efforts in China and India originated in the fact that people^ of their own kindred were known to be in those countries. If we go back into the records of ancient history, we find, as before observed, one marked period of AND THE SAXON RACE. 87 great obscurity, especially in relation to the country to which the Israelites were exiled. The wars of the Medes and Persians, which desolated those parts of Armenia, Media, and Assyria in which the captives dwelt, are not so narrated by any historian as to give the least clue to the relation in which the Israelites stood to those people, either during their continuance in their neighbourhood or afterwards. But there is one remarkable people beginning, for the first time, to take a name and a place in history. The Sacae are now mentioned, but only incidentally, as a tribe of Scythians, or indeed as being the very Scythians themselves. It appears as if the existence of the Sacae could only be accounted for by the Greeks and the Romans by supposing them to have come from the north. Nearly all that geographers and historians have preserved or intimated concerning this people, in respect to their early locale , is succinctly stated by Turner in his History of the Anglo-Saxons.* “ The Saxons were a Gothic or Scythian tribe ; and, of the various Scythian nations which have been recorded, the Sakai, or Sacae, are the people from whom the descent of the Saxons may be inferred with the least violation of probability. Sakai-suna, or the sons of the Sakai, abbreviated into Saksun, which is the same sound as Saxon, seems a reasonable etymology of the word Saxon. The Sakai, who in Latin are called S acae . were the most important branch of the Scythian nation. They were so celebrated that, as already^ observed, the Persians called all the Scythians by * Vol. i. p. 100. 88 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE Pthe name of Sacte; and Pliny, who mentions this, remarks that they were among the most distinguished people of Scythia.* Strabo places them eastward of the Caspian, and states them to have made many in- cursions on the Kimmerians and Treves, both far and near. They seized Bactriana and the most fertile part of Armenia, which from them derived the name SaJca- sina ; they defeated Gy£us, and they reached the Cap- padoces on the Eujdne.f This important fact of a part of Armenia having been named Sakasina is mentioned by Strabo in another place ; J this seems to give an [early] geographical locality to our primeval ances- tors, and to account for the Persian words which occur in the Saxon language, as they must have come into Armenia from the northern regions of Persia. r" “ That some of the divisions at least of the people were called Sakasuna, is obvious from Phpy; Tor he says that the Sakai who settled in Armenia [implying that they had come from another country], were named Sacass§Jii,§ which is but Sakasuni, spelt by a person unacquainted with the meaning of the combined words. And the name Sacosena,|| which they gave to the part of Armenia they occupied, is nearly the same sound as Saxonia. It is also im- portant to remark, that Ptolemy mentions a Scythian people, sprung from the Sakai, by the name of * Pliny, lib. vi. c. 19. f Strabo, lib. si. pp. 776, 788. J Strabo, p. 124. Mr. Keppel, in his late travels, calls this “ the beau- tiful province of Kavabaugh.” In a letter to the Royal Literary Society be says, “ I have traced 262 words in the Persian, Zend, and Peliloi lan- guages like as many in the Anglo-Saxon." § Pliny, lib. vi. c. 11. || Strabo, lib. xi. pp. 776, 778. AND THE SAXON RACE. 89 Savories. If the Sakai who reached Armenia were called Sacasani, they may have traversed Europe with the same appellation ; which, being pronounced by the Romans from them, and then reduced to writing from their pronunciation, would have been spelt with the x instead of the ks, and thus Saxones [or Saxons], would not be a greater deviation from Sacosani or Sacksuna, than we find between French, Francis, Franei, and their Greek name Pjwaggi; or between Spain, Espagne, and Hispania.” Sacarsuni being the name of this people in Arm enia, is itself a clue to their origin ; for the word would mean, in Hebrew, the changed Saks — W3W, not sons of Sak, but Saks that had altered their abode or their character. The Persians of old distinguished the Sacae into those of Saka Huma-verga [Amyrgian], and those of Saka Tigra-khuda , that is to say, the Tribes seated on the confines of India, and those scattered through the Persian empire. The name Saew was applied to them first as simply the Tribes , perhaps adopted from themselves ; but ultimately it came to signify bowmen, because they, like the Ephraimites and the English, were so famous for the use of the bow.* The country called Sak,ai -is one of those which were subject to Darius, according to Norris’s interpretation of the Scythic Behistun inscription. f The locality of this country is not indicated except by its con- nexion in the inscription; and from that we gather that it was on the borders of Media to the north-east, * See Rawlinson’s Herodotus, note, vol. iv. p. 65. f See Journal of Royal As. Soc. vol. xv. pp. 136-139. 90 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE the known seat of some of the Sakai after the Scythian invasion of Armenia and Assyria. Our Anglo-Saxon historian Turner points out the probable manner in which this bold and enterprising people were impelled westward until settled in our own land. We will not follow him ; but from another source we are interested to learn that the White Island in the west (England?) was in India denomi- nated Sacana, from the Sacas or Sacs, who conquered that island, and settled there at a very early period, as we find from the fact being mentioned in the Puranas named Yarada and Matsya.* Captain Wilford £ Vn s shown from these Puranas that the British Isles e to be understood by Sacam, as well as certain jacent parts of the Continent, such as Saxony.f That these S^icas, or Sacs, were of a race iden- tical with those that entered north-western India and overran a great part of Asia, is either implied or expressed by all historians who mention them, whether in the East or the West. The fact, then, seems pretty well established that the Saxon race sprung from the East, and that these have opposed and super- seded the dominion of old Rome wherever they have reached in the West. The spreadings and doings of the Saxon race constitute the chief parts of modern history. There is no land where they are not^and no people that has not been stirred up by them. They now take the Bible with them wherever they go, and found their commerce with the wide world taught upon the rights and liberties which Christianity has them to value as their lives. Here, then, as f Asiatic Res. xi. p. 54. * Asiatic Res. vol. ii. p. 61. AND THE SAXON RACE. 91 far as the Western world is concerned, we discover a people in whom are fulfilled most of the conditions of the prophecies concerning Ephraim, the son of that Joseph who was sold by his brethren and hidden in Egypt until the whole family of Jacob and the famished nations needed his manifestation as a maij^- 1 made wise and provident by wisdom from above. Thus Ephraim, too, is hidden, and yet from him shall flow the blessings of both earthly and heavenly nature to enrich humanity in every clime. The fact that we have six or seven hundred words in our language of Persian origin agrees with our own origin, amongst the Persians, but not of them. J Hebrew roots, too, are not few amongst our homeliest words. If we are related to the Sacavnur stirring, restless, conquering spirit is in keeping with that of our forefathers, ever famous for the bow and the battle- axe. A glance at the ancient Sg£aa in the East will show the likeness. They had detached themselves from Persia before Alexander’s invasion. Indepen- dently they fought, as allies of Darius, at Arbela. They contended with Alexander’s army without dis- honour. A century later they established their rule from the Aral - lake to the mouths of the Indus. They then invaded central India, but then fell under the dominion of the Parthians, probably of the same* race, and finally were absorbed in the kingdom of the Sassanidce , also Saxon, pretty much as the Saxons of England have become blended with the Normans, or Northmen, and the Danes, all traceable to the same Saxon source. The revolutionizing influence of the Saxons who, 92 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE in olden time, took possession of a great part of India, was certainly no less marked than that of the Saxons who emigrated westwards. So that, if it can be shown that the Saxons had any connexion with the descendants of Isaac, or were in their origin of the same race, then it follows that we ought to find v indications of their dominance through their opinions in the East as well as in the West, but more espe- cially in India. And if we Englishmen are only a branch of the same stock that at an early period re- volutionized India, and still maintain the influence of their religious ideas throughout the East, how won- derful and interesting is the providential position of England at present in respect to our Eastern do- minion ! If we could but clearly demonstrate our unbroken descent as Englishmen from the house of Isaac, and believe the prophets, with what interest we should look upon the promises made to Israel, and try to read our destiny in the Bible! Now, whether we succeed in this or not, it is plain that, the Hebrew Bible being truly ours, we are involved, in respect to ultimate results, in all that interests or ever did in- terest, the Israelites. And we may be sure that, so far as we too have a revelation, and that not merely through men and angels, but by the direct teaching and institutions of God through his Spirit in the Church, as we Christians profess to believe, the con- sequences of our neglecting rightly to employ our means wall be proportionately met by condemnation and dismay. If Israel has suffered as an outcast, and been lost as a distinct people, for worshipping Baali instead of the Holy One, shall professed Chris- AND THE SAXON RACE. 93 tians escape, who only worship Mammon, and make a market of God’s holy temple? Spiritually, at least, and therefore, doubtless, in the truest and highest sense, the prophecies concerning the chosen tribes are fulfilled in us. We hold the oracles of God, are blessed with the dews of heaven and the fatness of the earth. Nations serve us, and bow down to us, and are the better for it. We are lords, yea, lords over our own brethren, and “ cursed is every one who curseth us, and blessed is every one who blesseth us.” (Gen. xxvii. 28, 29.) We Saxons are heirs of the world, not by right, but by divine favour and providential training. We are bringing the ends of the world together and binding mankind into one compact community, by the sacred ties of the highest intelligence and religion, involving, of course, all material blessings. This is as it should be, for earth is one orb rolling round in eternal love, and em- braced in the light of Divine benevolence. But the true glory is not altogether an outward and visible thing. There is a glory which the eye of the spirit alone can see or endure, and that glory is the unfolding of the divine government in the history of the human race, and especially as manifested in the fulfilment of those prophecies contained in the sacred book by which God will demonstrate his attributes of fore- knowledge and wisdom, and prove Himself to be, in one word, the Omnipotent, that is, Good Will in infi- nite operation. So says the true Christian. We are involved in the fulfilment of the prophecies inspired by Jehovah, but how and to what extent the future must make known. If these Sac* can be con- 94 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE nected with the Israelites, we can see how the union of Israel and Judah is to be effected. From Judah sprung the human and Divine Saviour of men, and Israel receiving his Word hails Him as their Salvation and as the reigning Sovereign of a redeemed -world. Thus all nations shall be blessed by the faith that unites Jews and Gentiles alike to Christ. A work was published some time since (by Mr. J. Wilson, of Brighton), entitled Our Israelitish Origin. This was too much opposed to the views of popular expositors to be received with the candour it deserved; but it must be acknowledged that Mr. Wilson in that work has done much more to meet the requirements of prophecy than any that preceded him ; and although we dare not follow him into all the results to which he would lead us, still he has shown a large amount of probability, and indeed very much of the letter of Scripture, in favour of the opinion he has advocated, namely, that the Saxons are the descendants of Israelites as distinguished from the Jews. It is not to the purpose, however, here to follow in this track. Mr. Wilson has not advanced any direct evidence of Saxon connexion with Israel by descent, but he has indicated a great deal in the Anglo-Saxon character and customs which accords better with the notion of our Israelitish origin than with any other explanation of our peculiarities; but he lays most stress upon the circumstance that the prophecies concerning the family of Joseph are not fulfilled, unless in the Anglo-Saxons; a mode of treating the subject in the highest degree question- able, since it is necessary to the validity of such an AND THE SAXON RACE. 95 argument, first to prove our Israelitish origin by de- monstrating, not only that we are derived from the Sacae, but also that the Sacae were certainly Hebrews. Could we but find the broken link in the chain by which the Sakai or Sacae are supposed to have been connected with the Israelites, we should be at no loss to discover some of the modes in which the wondrous prophecies, so apparently contradictory and para- doxical, concerning the outcast tribes have been ful- filled in their descendants; for here are we, the Anglo-Saxons, with mind and heart imbued with the history and hopes of Israel, elevated and enlarged by the sublime doctrines and predictions of their sacred seers, sages, kings, and prophets, singing the songs of Zion in our temples, living in the noble expectation of universal blessedness under the glorious reign of the King of Salem, and desiring and endeavouring to promote the coming of his kingdom in all lands. The Saxons embrace the world, and the devout amongst them realize in faith and spirit the visions of all true prophets and seers that have been since the world began, and now anticipate the period when a King shall reign in righteousness, and princes rule in judgment. (Isai. xxxii.) What could converted Israelites do more? But the link is broken — the connexion between the Sakai and the house of Israel has not yet been found. But we think we have found it at last, as we are about to show something very like positive proof that the Sacse and the Get®, who formerly invaded India, sprang from the same source as the Saxons and Goths of the West, and were directly connected with 96 THE HEBKEW INFLUENCE Israelites, or with a people who employed their lan- guage. This, however, will scarcely serve to prove that the Gothic and Saxon races are the direct descendants of Joseph, to whom were promised all the blessings of increase and abundance. The facts and arguments accumulated by several writers may well suffice, however, to convince us that an Israelitish influence has been infused into the people from whence we sprung, and that the spirit of Israel’s training, in war, legislature, religion, and all outward endeavour, has been operating amongst us to qualify our popula- tions to colonize all countries ; and while preparing the ground for the highest culture, penetrating the everlasting hills for gold and treasure, traversing all seas, building docks in every harbour, intersecting the mountains and the valleys with roads of wrought iron, riding on fiery chariots with the speed of tem- pests, sending forth their thoughts and words on lightning wings from land to land, and declaring everywhere, this earthly earnestness notwithstanding, that this world is not our rest. These, however, are not the positive marks by which the offspring of the escaped remnant is to be known at last. Still these Sacce are too peculiar in their rise and history not to be intended by Providence as one of the grand way-marks by which the patient and humble inquirer after evidences of Divine purpose in the distributions of mankind may expect to be directed in the right road to the end he seeks ; for he knows that all that stands prominently forwards in the world’s history is intended in a special manner to elucidate some point in the prophetic Word. The AND THE SAXON KACE. 97 ways of God to man, as verbally revealed on the prin- ciples of moral law in the books and in the experiences of the Hebrew people, are also revealed in the world’s history. There is indication that the Sac®, if they took not their name from the house of Isaac, were at least connected with Isaac’s descendants. The word Sacce or Sakai is remarkable in the history of lan- guage, and the philologists have been unable satisfac- torily to trace its origin. The word Isaac is equally remarkable, but we are told its derivation in the ! story of Isaac’s parentage and home-life. (Gen. xvii. 17.) It is from pnx, and means laughter, either as expressive of derision, incredulity, or joy. The initial I is not essential to it, and is perhaps prefixed to make it a personal as well as prophetic designation. Now, as we find this name adopted by the house of Israel and applied to them by the pro- phet Amos, who denounced them and their idolatries in this name not long before their banishment, we have only to discover reason and occasion for their using this designation afterwards, to account at once for the name Sacas and all that is connected with it. In Amos (vii. 9) the word Isaac is employed as synonymous with Israel. It was after the tribes of Israel had separated themselves from Judah, and thus also from the hopes and promises connected with the house of David, that they acquired this name. After they had, in their pride and independence, sought another king, and one of their own, rather than accept any in the royal line to which the prophecies had pointed for the Messiah and the everlasting kingdom, the prophet calls them the house of Isaac. This is memorable. 98 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE They did not think by this rejection of God’s Anointed to reject the hopes of Israel, but rather in their wil- fulness appeared to fall back upon the anterior promise, and to look for blessing and power in the name of Isaac, the true seed of Abraham, in whom all the nations of the earth should be blessed. They arrogated the right of dominion in this name when occupying the hills of Samaria; and it is therefore highly probable that, when the conquering Assyrian king drove all their families from their fatherland, they still boasted of their descent from Isaac. They preferred to mingle idol- worship on high places with their traditional ritual, and thought, perhaps, with the opinionated and Cainlike spirit of refiners of God’s ordinances, to honour Jehovah more by calling Him Baal , or Lord of all , than by worshipping Him as the God of their fathers and the chosen people only. The origin of the name Sacce , or Sakai , for the inha- bitants of that part of Armenia which the Sac® occupied after the expulsion of the Scythians, is thus naturally accounted for. That they should be confounded with the Scythians is equally natural, especially as there is reason to suppose that they afterwards colonized amongst that wide-spread race of marauders, and gave their name to the country they occupied beside the Massageta?. They attained so conspicuous a position amongst the Scythian nations, from superior arts, prowess, and industry, as at length to give their royal name to the dominant part of that race. It is at least remarkable that the ' name Sacce is not applied by the classic historians and geographers to any tribe of the Scythians until AND THE SAXON RACE. ' 99 some time subsequent to the exile of the house of Isaac. History assures us that the Israelites were per- mitted to exercise very remarkable influence during their captivity. It was a family of the exiles named Shambat that reigned in Armenia for a considerable period, as it is said, contemporary with Nebuchad- nezzar.* Then, again, Daniel and his compatriots of the royal house of David were elevated to positions of the highest influence during the reign of Darius, and by the wonders that God wrought through the holy name of Israel’s Jehovah, became dreadful and revered throughout and beyond the Persian dominion, which extended from this side of the Euphrates to the Indus, and from the Caspian to the Arabian Sea. After the Persian empire came under the power of Nebuchadnezzar, king of Babylon, the name of Daniel’s God was known to many tongues ; and all people, nations, and languages that could be reached by the messengers of the mighty despot, now restored to his reason, were exhorted by him to praise, extol, and honour the King of Heaven — the self-existent Deity of the Jews — “ all whose works are truth, and his ways judgment, and who abases all who walk in pride.” (Dan. iv. 37.) If that strangely beautiful episode of history, the book of Esther, relates to the condition of those Jews who remained in the land of their exile after the return of their brethren to Jeru- salem (b.c. 536), as it appears to do, we have evi- dence that they were at that time very numerous and influential. The events related in the story are said * See Armenia, in Penny Encyclopedia. H 2 100 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE to have occurred in the reign of Ahasuerus, who is supposed to be the same as Artaxerxes (b.c. 462). It is stated that his dominion extended from India* to Ethiopia, over a hundred and twenty-seven pro- vinces. (Esther i. 1.) It must, therefore, have em- braced all the countries into which the Ten Tribes were deported by the Assyrians. If, therefore, the Ten Tribes, as a body, were still in those countries in the time of Esther, we might reasonably expect to find something concerning them in this book ; but we do not. Throughout, the Hebrews are named by the designation invariably and distinctively applied only to those attached to the house of Judah — Judeans or Jews (D'TiiTn). This is remarkable, as the circum- stances related would necessarily have involved all the Israelites then in those countries. Esther had been providentially elevated to an influential partner- ship in the throne of the splendid tyrant Ahasuerus. Haman, one of his nobles, in envious and ignoble pride, endeavoured to resist the encroachments of Jewish influence; and he contrived to obtain an edict for the entire destruction of the Jews, on the ground that the national and established religion was endan- gered by them. (Esther iii. 8, 9.) A day was ap- pointed for a general massacre of the ambitious * India is here called 1~Tn. or Hodhu. Is it not probable that this name is from Ayodhya (? mVil). now Oude, which, according to the Rama- yana, once ruled over all India ? The first dynasty of Oude is said to have been founded by Ramah, a sort of hero-divinity, who came from his holy mountain west of Caubul, probably Indo-Koosh. Now Raamah is the son of Cush, or Koosh, the grandson of Noah. (Gen. s. 7.) Indo-Koosh takes its name from this Cush, the son of Ham. May not the hero Ramah be the same as this Raamah ? AND THE SAXON RACE. 101 exiles; but in the meantime Hainan's craft was de- % feated. The king’s heart, strong in wilfulness, was weaker than the voice of woman; for it is ordained that the eloquence of beauty, love, and faith shall be always stronger than the changeless laws of the Medes and Persians; for such laws are made in the strength of man, but nature is the strength of God. The Jews were to be slaughtered; the word had gone forth, and could not be recalled ; their enemies were armed, and animated with the hope of a rich and easy spoil. (Esther ii. 16.) But a counter-edict gave the Jews the right to defend themselves, and they vindicated their right like men possessed of noble ■ hearts and trained to the high thoughts and deeds of a patriotic and divine creed. u They gathered them- selves together in their cities throughout all the pro- vinces of the king” (ix. 2), and “slew seventy-five thousand of their enemies,” and “ had the rule over those that hated them,” though “ they took no prey ” (ix. 16). Now, in all this none of the Ten Tribes were concerned, but only the Judeans; from which we infer that the Israelites, who delighted to call themselves Beni-Israel, had before that departed as a body from Media and Persia. During the twenty- eight years in which the Scythians kept the Medes, Persians, and Assyrians in subjection, the Israelites must have enjoyed ample opportunity to become acquainted with them, and afterwards to join them, if, as we have reason to believe, the Scythians were friendly to them. And if they went, where were they so likely to go as into the countries on the borders of the Caspian Sea, where the Scythians predominated? 102 THE HEBREW INFLUENCE We know that Ezekiel was consulted by the elders of Israel when on the banks of Chebar, and when at Tel- abib he visited his exiled brethren. This was about 594 b.c. He then told them of his vision, and they appear to have spoken of their desire to go into some country beyond ; .probably some place that might be known as the Highland, or high place, such as the • steppes of Tartary; for he states, as if in reference alike to their desires, their destiny, and their idolatry, that he “ then said unto them, What is the high place whereunto ye go? the name thereof is even called Bamah [a high-place] unto this day.” This play upon the words the high-place and a high place is utterly unaccountable, except on the supposition of their having mentioned their going collectively to some land to which they gave the name of Habamah. The places in which they were accustomed to conduct their idolatrous worship were called liigh-places; but it is evident such places were not here meant, for the prophet, after telling them how God would judge and scatter them and pour his fury on them, and purge out the rebels and not let them enter the land of Israel, adds,“ As for you, 0 house of Israel, thus saith the Lord God, Go ye, serve ye every one his idols, and hereafter [also], if ye will not hearken unto me, but pollute ye my holy name no more with j T our gifts and your idols.” (xx. 39.) God declares He will “ bring them out from the people and gather them from the countries where they are to be scat- tered ;” “ and will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn, but they shall not enter into the land of Israel” (xx. 33-39). As heretofore, AND THE SAXON RACE. 103 so hereafter, they shall go and still serve idols. They talk of going to some high place called the Bamah; ■were they not always going to Bamah, for is not that the name of the places in which they were constantly committing idolatry with steady devotion? Go, says the prophet, go to your desired Bamah ; serve your idols, when there, as you do now; but know, God, whose name you pollute, will judge you there. We may possibly see more of the meaning of this Bamah as we proceed. We must not here lose sight of the significant fact that the prophet foretells that, though these Israelites desired to be like the heathen, they should not be so. “ That which cometh into your mind shall not be at all, that ye say, we will be as the heathen, as the families of the countries, to serve wood and stone” (xx. 32). They are to be distinct from ordinary idolaters in their idolatry, not actually worshipping wood and stone as gods. According to the best chronology we can get on the subject, it appears that the prediction of their exodus from Assyria was delivered about the year 594 b.c., or seven years after the captivity of Jehoiachin (com- pare Ezra i. 2 with xx. 1), two years after the vision on the banks of the Chebar (now Khabur). The Scythians had been expelled but a few years before, for Cyaxares I. reigned forty years (Herod, i. 106), and died 600 b.c., soon after his conquest of Nineveh, which he undertook immediately subsequent to their expulsion. There was, doubtless, sympathy between the Scythians and those Ephraimites who were given up to idolatry and the worship of high places ; they were alike prone to intoxication and famous for the 104 HEBREW INFLUENCE AND THE SAXON RACE. use of the bow. In Persian, Sacai, that is, a Sacian, was synonymous with glutton and drunkard,* which are terms applied by the prophet to the house of Isaac; and, if historians may be trusted, the Saxon branch of the Scythian family have always taken so very kindly to their food and their drink as to worship their gods with gluttony and drunkenness. But where shall we find any record of the exodus of the Ephraimites, the house of Israel, the house of Isaac, the house of Joseph, the rebellious house? By all these names had the prophets addressed them; but, after Ezekiel, no prophet mentions them. Daniel ignores them ; Haggai has no message for them ; Ezra and Nehemiah fail to account for them. Where are the} 7 ? We may better answer that question when we have considered another, which shall form the subject of a distinct chapter. * An. Hist. Un. vol. xx. p. 15. 105 t CHAPTER Y. Israel’s new names. Did the Israelites acquire other names during their captivity ? At the time that Ezekiel visited the captives by the river Chebar, Nebuchadnezzar was ruler, not only over the kingdom of Babylon, but also over the whole of Assyria, Nineveh having been taken and added to Media, so that all the Hebrew captives were under his dominion. The Israelites of the captivities under Tiglath-Pileser and Shalmaneser were in Media and in the country about the Chebar. They had been there nearly a hundred years, and were probably very numerous at the time when Nebuchadnezzar founded the Babylonian empire and conquered Judea. We should therefore expect to discover some traces of their existence in the profane historians of the Babylonian and Median empires. It would be in vain, however, to look for them under the name of Israelites or Hebrews, seeing that as such they had lost their nationality. We should therefore seek them under some name expressive of their condition at present, rather than as indicating their nation. I think that those who dwelt in Assyria acquired the name of Sacie, and that those in Media will be found in the Budii (BouSiot), said by Herodotus to be a 106 Israel’s new names. tribe of the Medes. (Herod, i. 101.) The Budii ap- pear to be the same as the Putiya of the Persians, and are supposed by Rawlinson to be the Budii of the Babylonian inscriptions. This able writer also regards these Budii as a Scythian people, and deems it probable that they may be identified with the Phut of Scripture; but I would accept the Persian name, Putya or Puthya , as a name likely enough to be ap- plied to the Israelitish people by themselves — n\n3 = broken of God. That the Budii are mentioned by Herodotus as a Scythian people, and also as a tribe of the Medes, may be accounted for very easily, if it can be shown that they were neither, but really Israelites hidden under this name, both in Media and Scythia ; and, of course, on the same ground, their supposed identification with Phut is at once disposed of. As, however, the Budii will be fully considered in a suc- ceeding chapter, I will leave them at present with a simple assertion of their being most likely Israelites, a people to whom the word Budii would very well apply, seeing that, as a Hebrew word, it would signify the separated people (*"q). There is another people, named Sukhi , in the inscriptions deciphered by Raw- linson. This people dwelt by the Chebar; probably on the site of the modern Zacho or Sacho. These people may possibly be identified with the Sac®, or Sakliai, who afterwards get confounded witli the Scythians, in consequence of their being mixed with them. All the reasons for this identification cannot be at present stated ; but one strong reason appears in the fact that they occupied the situation between the Tigris and Euphrates by the Chebar, where Ezekiel met the ISRAEL’S NEW NAMES. 107 Israelitish captives, whom I have endeavoured to identify with the Sacte, on the supposition that they adopted this name in remembrance of their descent from Isaac ; but the word not having come to us with its original orthography, we reason on the subject with the more difficulty. Could we find the word Sacae spelt in characters equivalent to the three letters that form the root of the word Isaac — pnx, the ques- tion would be almost decided, for the word is too peculiarly Hebrew in its form to have any other derivation than that assigned to it in Holy Writ. (Gen. xxi. 6.) Now, I think we have the word pre- cisely in those equivalents in the Scythic version of the Behistun inscription, so ably presented to us in the memoir thereon by Mr. E. Norris.* This version may or may not be Scythian ; it is enough for our purpose that we find the word we want inscribed on a rock in Persia about the time of Cyrus. The word consists of three characters, which Mr. Norris renders Saakka, but which in Hebrew equivalents would probably stand as pns, the very word Isaac without the initial yod , which properly makes no part of the name. If we suppose the name SuJchi to be derived from any other Hebrew word common to the Chaldees also, we may perhaps find it in "pttf; which would still apply to the Israelites, for, as a name, it would mean a people emptied from one place into another. We have the same word in use amongst us, and to sack a city is to empty it of treasure. We might imagine several derivations of the word; but we need not wander into further conjecture, as it is enough that * Journ. Roy. As. Soc. vol. xv. art. 1, p. 206. 108 Israel’s new names. the country inhabited by the Israelites had a name which so far connects them with the Sacae, or Sakhai, for by and bye we shall discover this name in dis- tinct connexion with a people that used the Hebrew tongue. The only Hebrew equivalent for the name of the people called by the Latins Sacae and the Greeks Sakai (2a/ccu and 2a'/cac) is that already given as the equivalent of the Behistun inscription, and in English the Sacs or Saxons. That the Sacae had some remarkable bearing upon the Babylonians is evident from a singular festival celebrated amongst them called Sacca or Sacea. Athenaeus, after Be- rosus, informs us that the festival was instituted in consequence of a signal victory obtained by Croe- sus, King of Lydia, over the Sacae, said by Athenaeus to be a Scythian people. This took place about 562 b.c. The Babylonians were at that time the allies of the King of Lydia; but the circumstances of the festival celebrated by the Babylonians in remem- brance of that event are of too remarkable a character to be explained by the mere fact of the alliance. Five days every year were devoted to this festival by the Babylonians; during which the slaves or servants commanded their masters, one of them being for the time constituted chief over the house, and wearing a kind of royal robe, which they called Zagana.* It would appear, therefore, that this victory of Croesus over the Sacae in some way related to the mastery of the Babylonians over their slaves. Is it not, then, probable that these Sacae were at one time in the position of slaves or * Anc. Hist. Univ. vol. iv. p. 121. Israel’s new names. 109 captives to the Babylonians, and that they had es- caped from their dominions, and for a time assumed a royalty of their own, and possessed a power which even Croesus might boast of having checked? That the Babylonians had reason to rejoice in his victory is evident; and perhaps their rejoicing maybe ex- plained, if we suppose that the Sacce and the Scythians were encountered by Croesus when on their way to invade the Babylonians, who would not only remem- ber that the Scythians had not long before “ become masters of all Asia ” ( Herod. ) for twenty-eight years, but were the more to be dreaded now as led on by the Sacae, who desired to avenge themselves upon the tyrants who had enslaved them. Zagana was probably the name of the robe worn by the chiefs or prefects, a title among the Babylonians and Persians, and amongst the Jews also, after their return from captivity. In the Behistun inscription we find three classes of Sacae referred to (p. 150); namely, the Sacae named next to India, the Sacae who use arrows, and the Sacae who are said to be beyond (?) the river. We therefore find them scat- tered very widely, and no longer constituting one people or nation, although evidently one race; which is just the condition in which we should expect the house of Isaac to be found at that time, under the circumstances to which we know they must have been exposed, first, from their separations in their early captivity, and then from the wars and divisions in the countries they occupied. The river referred to must have been either the Tigris or the Euphrates. The word rendered beyond ( vittuvanna ) would, 1 110 Israel’s new names. conceive, be better rendered gone beyond, implying 1 their voluntary removal from their original seat (by the Chebar) ; a fact which would fully accord with the testimony of Esdras and the facts already stated. The Ephraimites, or house of Isaac, were notable as bowmen (see Ps. lxxviii. 9); and here the use of the arrow is given as characteristic of one division of the Sacae, as it was of the Sacae that Cyrus and Alexander the Great encountered to their cost ; and we know the Saxons that fought their way to England were also famous bowmen. As one class of these Sacae, at the time of the Behistun inscription, dwelt in the north about the Cas- pian sea, and another at the north-west of India, we may well imagine the third class, seemingly a peace- ■ able people, on the west of the rivers Tigris and Euphrates, desirous of being united with their breth- ren, whom they could have no hope of reaching through Media and Persia, which were now the lands of their foes; and therefore their course could only be through the passes of the Massa, or Mount Mesha, on the western side of the Caspian, through which the Scythians are said by Herodotus to have entered Armenia. The Massagetae and the Scythians were probably ready to let them settle amongst them, or to pass on; and, in fact, the early history of the Sacae is mixed with those nations, so much so, that they have been confounded together. In looking over the his- tory of Media we find that Ctesias* leaves the Sacae and the Medes at peace with each other after a long struggle together, the Sacae having been led on by a * Diod. Sic. 1. ii. c. 3. ISRAELS NEW NAMES. Ill wonderful heroine named Zamara.* This may be in some measure fabulous as to date, but is likely to have been asserted on other grounds than that of imagina- tion. Such a statement points to some such reality. Then, again, the Parthians are said to have revolted from the Medes under the protection of the Sacae who inhabited Mount Haemod us, which separates India from Scythia. Thisagain points to the standing of these Sacae in relation to the Medes, and also indicates the direc- tion in which we are to look for “ the peculiar people.” There were no impediments in the way of their colonization among the Scythians, and, in fact, the existence of a new people under the name of Sakai, or Sacae, about the east of the Caspian Sea and on the northern side of the Imaum mountains, is proved by re- ference to the historians already quoted in the extract from Turner’s History of the Anglo-Saxons, and also by the name of the country being given in the Be- histun inscription as under the protection of Darius, the son of Idystaspes (b.c. 555). The Sacae, like most of the tribes of Israel, who once inhabited the mountains of Samaria, were a pastoral as well as a warlike people, and the country into which we shall trace the Sakai, or Sacae, was peculiarly adapted to the wants and habits of such a people. That a large body of Hebrews did proceed northward from Ar- menia, and were resident in the neighbourhood of the Caspian Sea, appears probable, as already stated, from the circumstance that, after the Jews were permitted to return to Palestine, Ezra sent to the chief of the place, Casipliia (Ezra viii. 7), for ministers. * Anc. Hist. vol. v. p. 25. 112 ISRAEL S NEW NAMES. It is important to observe that the Caspians are mentioned by Herodotus in connexion with the Sacae as united tributaries to Darius, son of Hystaspes. (Herod, iii. 93.) This Darius was king of Babylon, Media, and Persia. (Dan.xi. 2). Here we again observe also that the Babylonian title Sacaj is not vernacu- lar but foreign, and, as used by them, simply means “ the tribes,” corresponding to the Greek I ~lap$v'\oi.* Ezra’s message is remarkable, and proves that Hebrews were not only dwelling near the Caspian, but ob- serving Hebrew rites there, and were subsisting under a government of their own. Ezra states : “ I sent them [the messengers] with commandment unto Iddo, the chief of the place Casiphia, and I told them what they should say unto Iddo and to his brethren the Nethinims at the place Casiphia, that they should bring- unto us ministers for the house of God.” We have the authority of Dr. Henderson for interpreting the word Casiphia as the name of a country border- ing on the Caspian Sea.f Hebrew remnants of the captivity are still resident on the eastern borders of the Caucasus. But when we come to speak of the Sacte in northern India we shall find distinct evidence that the Nethinim were there also, and known by the name of Botans. It is not unlikely that the people called Isicki, who were for the first time allied with Rome in the consulate of Nero, were Hebrews; and their name certainly associates them with the house of Isaac. But Tacitus, in alluding to their usefulness in the Roman invasion of Armenia under Tiridates, * See note in H. C. Rawlinson’s Herodotus — Cimmerians, f Russian Researches. ISRAEL’S NEW NAMES. 113 implies that they so effectually aided Carbulo because they were good horsemen and well acquainted with Armenia; characteristics that would well accord with remnants of the Sac®, who conquered that country, according to Strabo, and whom we suppose to have gone through that country in their passage to the land of the Scythians. We seem to get a glimpse of the Sac® again in the mightiest dynasty of the Parthians. The Sassani, or Saxani, threw off the authority of the Assyrian kings and founded an independent kingdom, which subse- quently extended from the Indus to the Euphrates, and from the Oxus to the Persian Gulf. Were not the Saxani, Saxons? The last of the Sassanide kings was Yesdigird, who set himself to harass the Jews in Persia (Heb. Liter, p. 217); but it is remarkable that those who sided with the house of David, or the so-called Davidic family, were all put to death. This took place about a.d. 651, when the Chalif Omar’s all-subduing arms had made Persia desirous of the triumph of the Crescent. This distinction between Jews of the Davidic family and other Israelites in- dicates that the majority of the great multitude of Hebrews in that country, at that comparatively recent period, were Beni-Israel, and that they ultimately sub- mitted to Mahometan influence ; so that, if we are to find any of their descendants there now, we are to find them as Mahometans. This dynasty, according to Justin, was called Par- thian, from a Scythian word signifying the banished or the exiles. Some say the Parthians were the same as the Get®, Massaget®, or European Goths. I 114 Israel’s new names. Strabo says that Arsaces, who founded the kingdom of Parthia, was a Sacean or Saxon. But the fact seems to be that the first Saxons who reigned in Parthia took this name because they were Sacte from the pro- vince Aran — hence Arsaces. This titular appellation was first assumed by the princes of Parthia 254 b.c. The first who took this name was a native of Balkh in Bactria. He revolted from Antiochus Tlieus, slew Agathocles, the governor of Parthia, and took the title of Great King. The country of the Sacae, or Sacha? (or the tribes — Sanscrit), is called in the Puranas Saca- dicipa , a country among the fountains of the Oxus; and from this name, Saca-dwipa , the Greeks composed the word Scythia — 2/c vOai.* They are the same people who destroyed Cyrus and his hosts (according to Herodotus), who paid tribute to Darius, who as- sisted Xerxes, and who overthrew the dominion of the Seleucian dynasty in Bactria, about 130 b.c. Parthians and Medes were amongst the devout Israel- ites who were present on the day of Pentecost in Jerusalem. Israelites must have been mixed with the Parthians on any hypothesis; and if, as Josephus asserts, the descendants of the captives of Assyria were dwelling in countless numbers beyond the Eu- phrates in his day, then there is nothing improbable in the opinion that the Parthian dynasty of the Sassani, if not Israelitish, was sustained at least by Israelites. And if they were one with the Sacte and Sassanes, we discern how, in the usual order of Provi- dence, the people once oppressed by Assyrian tyrants * So says Major Tod in his account of Greek and Parthian medals ; but we find the word Skuta for Scythia in the Babylonian and so-called Scythian of the Behistun inscriptions as early as Cyrus. Israel’s new names. 115 should become the means of destroying their power, so that Nineveh and Babylon and Persepolis should perish and be interred under the wanderers’ feet. We at least discover in the changes in the country of Israel’s exile, subsequent, if not previous, to the Jews’ return from captivity, abundant opportunity for a people so well trained to warfare and toil as these Israelites were, to have proceeded into another country, if they had desired it. They did desire it. It is true we have found few traces at present, and we do not expect to find positive proofs of the progresses of the Beni-Israel until we have advanced further. It appears to have been the purpose of Providence, in connexion with the fulfilment of the Scriptures, to conceal the paths of the outcast tribes until the final winding up of history, when it shall be demonstrated that the Spirit which inspired the prophets is the self- same Spirit that set bounds to human revolutions, and scattered the nations like seed from the sower’s hand into ground prepared to produce fruit for the garner of God. But did the Ten Tribes ever leave the land of their captivity? If we had found it plainly written in the pages of Herodotus that the Ten Tribes did desire to leave that land, and did accomplish their desire, but few among us would question the fact. Now, we have already appealed to historic evidence of a fact quite as well preserved and quite as authentic as any in Herodotus, or Xenophon, or Pliny, and it is only called apocryphal, or doubtful, in comparison with our canonical Scriptures. In the 2nd Esdras xiii. 39-46, are these words : “ And whereas thou sawest that he i 2 116 ISRAEL’S NEW NAMES. [z.e., the Son of God] gathered another peaceable multitude unto him; those are the Ten Tribes which were carried away prisoners out of their own land in the time of Osea the king, whom Salmanasar, the King of Assyria, led away captive, and he carried them over the waters, so they came into another land. But they took this counsel among themselves, that they would leave the multitude of the heathen, and go forth into a f urther country, where never mankind dwelt, that they might there keep their statutes, which they never kept in their own land. And they entered into Euphrates by the narrow passages of the river [in Armenia]. For the Most High then showed signs for them, and held still the flood till they were passed over. For through that country there was a great way to go, namely, of a year and a half; and the same region is called Arsareth. Then they dwelt there until the latter time ; and now, when they shall begin to come, the Highest will stay the springs of the stream again, that they may come through ; therefore sawest thou the multitude with peace.” I presume that the word JTRiTiN (Arsareth) may be fairly and properly rendered by its exact equivalent Oriens, the Orient, the land of the far East, the country always called Oriental. Unfortunately we do not possess the Hebrew word which would decide the point, as the books of Esdras have reached us only in Greek. Let us take this remarkable passage at its value as an early historical evidence in proof of the fact that the Ten Tribes left the place of their captivity for an abode more to their minds in the East, while the people that might otherwise have prevented it were Israel’s new names. 117 restrained by the providence of God.* In chap. xx. of Ezekiel, verse 38, there is a strong confirmation of this passage ; God says, “ I will bring them forth out of the country where they sojourn , and they shall not enter into the land of Israel .” When denouncing the false prophets of Israel the prophet Ezekiel also declares that “ They shall not be written in the writing of the house of Israel , neither shall they enter into the land of IsraeV' (xiii. 9). We must remember that Ezekiel was himself at that time an exile, and amongst the Israelites by the river Chebar. (Ezek. i. 1, 3.) Now, if the captives are conducted forth from the land of their captivity, and yet they do not return to Pales- tine, where do they go? Hosea prophesied that they would refuse to return after they had been sent into Assyria (Hos. xi. 6) ; and Amos, in predicting the wan- derings of outcast Israel in search of divine direction, says, “ They shall wander from sea to sea , and from the north even to the east, and shall run to and fro to seek the word of the Lord, and shall not find it." (Amos viii. 12.) This prediction could not have been verified by any wandering to and fro in Palestine, for the word of the Lord was always there. And besides, from sea to sea, could not be from the north to the east in their own land. Other passages from the prophets concerning the same subject guide us to the locality in which the peculiar and pure remnant of Israel, escaped from Assyria, is to be found in the latter day; for when Judah and Ephraim are to be * When questioning the authority of Esdras, it will be right to remem- ber that our Lord appears to quote that book. Compare Matt, xxiii. 34 with 2 Esdras i. 32, and Matt, xxiii. 37 with 2 Esdras i. 28-33. 118 Israel’s new names. called home together, it is to be from the West and from the East. Jeremiah, who prophesied to the Jews concerning their captivity and restoration, while exulting in the redemption of Judah, and anticipating the song of joy on the height of Zion, when the Jews should be ransomed from the hand of the strong, in- troduces a beautiful episode in remembrance of the Israelites who had long been banished. Personifying the people under the name of their Eamah, he pre- dicts comfort for the weeping Rachel. Then bursting forth with Divine remonstrance and tenderness, Ephraim is called to remembrance as a dear child. But, as if this idea were not tender enough, the whole people is called back as by a father’s voice addressed to a wandering daughter. The refusal of Israel to look to Zion is foreseen, the outgoing of the nation to a further country is foretold, and she is recalled. “ Set thee up way marks, and make thee high heaps ; set thine heart towards the highway, the way thou wentest; turn again, 0 virgin of Israel, turn again to these thy cities. How long wilt thou go about, 0 thou backsliding daughter?” (Jer. xxxi. 21, 22.) I believe that the course which the Israelites took is marked by those tumuli and high heaps which extend from the north of the Caspian into Western India. Writers whose theories concerning the Israelites would be disturbed by the testimony of Esdras above quoted, endeavour to dispose of it by a bold stroke. Thus Dr. Grant, believing that the Israelites as a body never left Assyria, but are now in Kurdistan, says that Esdras, in the passage referred to, meant only to Israel’s new names. 119 describe the captivity by Shalmaneser (2 Kings xvii. 6), and adds, that as the Israelites on that occasion crossed the Euphrates, and that as the Tigris unites with that river, therefore it was probably included under the same name, and the country of Arsareth may be the same as Hattareh ( i.e . Halah), or Ararat.* But why assume that the distance between Palestine and Armenia would require, in ordinary Oriental parlance, a year and a half for a caravan to traverse? Then too, it is evident that the writer of the second book of Esdras speaks of himself as once among the cap- tives, and therefore we may be well assured that, when he spoke of their going forth into a further country, he did not mean to say that they only went from Samaria to Assyria ; for it is while in Assyria they resolve to go into a further country, and that country requiring a year and a half to reach. A fatal objection to Dr. Asahel Grant’s hypothesis is the fact that the number of these remnants of Israel is so small, being only about 200,000 as the whole progeny of the Ten Tribes. It is calculated that the Jews descended from Judah and Benjamin alone, at the present time, amount to nearly nine mil- lions. When we remember that it is to the tribes descending direct from Joseph that the blessing of increase is especially promised, it is evident that the few Israelites remaining in Kurdistan cannot repre- sent them : “ I will be as the dew unto Israel ; he shall grow as the lily and cast forth his roots as Lebanon. His branches shall spread, and his beauty shall be as the olive-tree. Ephraim shall say, What * Murray’s third edition of Grant’s “ Nestorians,” p. 202. 120 Israel’s new names. have I to do any more with idols; I have heard him, and observed him; I am like a green fir-tree. From me is thy fruit found.” (Hos. xiv. 6-8.) We will take it for granted, then, that the Ten Tribes, that is, the rebel house of Israel or Isaac, did leave the land of their captivity and pass into the north, and that from thence they were dispersed in various directions, but that the main body of them ultimately settled in the East. Mr. Forster observes that “ there is great probability that the Arsareth, or Iiasarah [why drop the r?], to which the Israelites went, is the very nation and country named by Ptolemy Bar-Zaura, Bar meaning sons in Syriac. The Hebrew definite article ha, being prefixed to Zaura, or Sara, would form the very word Hasarath, for Saratli is but the fuller feminine form of Sarah. Hence we obtain another indication of the Hebrew or Syrian origin of the name of the people inhabiting that country, according to Ptolemy; for, in fact, the name he applies signifies the sons of Sarah, that is, of Abraham’s wife, the mother of the promised seed.” Hazara is the name still retained by that country, as we find in Mr. Elphinstone’s “ Kingdom of Caubul ” (p. 669). It lies along the Hehnund river, the largest river of Khorasan. This country may have been oc- cupied by Israelites, and I believe we shall, as we proceed in our research, discover evidences that it was. In the meantime, though it appears not improbable that the Sacce really derived their name from Isaac, and that they were, in fact, Israelites who had either adopted that name, or had it imposed upon them by way of distinction, yet we shall obtain evidence Israel’s new names. 121 that the name of Saca> might be associated with Israelites from other circumstances. The harder vowel of the patronymic being dropped, and the sibi- lant softened, the sons of Isaac become the sons of sackcloth ; it is literally but the change of a breathing. The one name indeed signifies laughter, and the other grief; but the transition is as easy and common in fact as in sound, and surely the history of the Sacae more than that of any other people proves that both triumph and trial are providentially associated, with their name. It is still the Saxon race of which we are in search. If so, say our readers, why trouble yourself to go beyond home? Is not Britain the abode of Saxons, and is not the vast continent of Northern America peopled by that energetic and subduing race? Yes; doubtless we are Saxons. We have sprung from a tribe of fierce barbarians cradled in the East, nur- tured amongst the Heavenly, or Himalaya mountains, trained to arms among the hordes of the Tartarian steppes, forced to become marauders for a mainte- nance, driven back again by Roman conquerors into the frozen zone, and now, independent and robust, from the necessities fixed upon us by a kind Provi- dence, we Saxons dwell upon all the borders of the world — the wonder of its peoples. But yet Ave are not the pure descendants of the sons of Isaac, not pure Saksuns ; but rather, perhaps, a balanced mixture of extremes, the offspring of savages and Avildmen, the outcasts of the family of Japhet, united Avith a Semitic race inured to the difficulties and dangers of forest life, and contending for existence with beasts 122 ISRAELS NEW NAMES. of prey and fiercer beings. But we believe that the savage worshipper of all the elements — most adored when most in conflict — in thunder, tempest, and in earthquake — has been tutored by admixture with wanderers of that race whose faculties had been of old most elevated by converse with divine and re- vealed truth. The blood of Israel has mixed with ours, and it may be that the admixture of eastern and northern souls has made the Saxons the most abstruse, the most metaphysical, the most tempted, the most daring, the most practical, and the most commanding people in the world. The savage Saxon, indeed, confounded inspiration with inebriety, and once, like the Ephraimites, made drunkenness a part and proof of his devotion to his deities; but now the book of God is open among his children, and the Voice that spake alike on Sinai and on the Mount of Olives is heard with reverence and love. The contemplative and devotional spirit of Isaac and his own true sons is become apparent and predominant among us, and the seed of heavenly truth is rooted and vigorously blooming in our midst, and our right to the name of Saxon is proved alike by our Oriental derivation, by the character of our nation, and by the fulfilment of the prophecies in our own persons. But still we are but partakers of a larger portion of the incidental blessings resulting from the wanderings of Israel, and not the literal Israel ourselves. But higher far are we, if indeed partakers of the heavenly calling. 123 CHAPTER VI. CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. From the antecedents of Israel, what is to be expected from such a people when resolving to separate them- selves from heathens and to set up an independent kingdom, not in obedience to any divine command, but in confident reliance on their own piety and pre- tensions? In the land of their fathers they proved themselves perversely devotional, zealous in altar- building, worshipping the heavenly host in groves and high places, addicted to necromancy and adora- tion of the dead, reverencing every form of life, even to the worship of creeping things, mixing the attri- butes of Jehovah and every syllable of His holy Xame with idolatries of every kind. The sophistry of senti- ment, as usual, turned them from the obedience of faith to the delusions of fancy, and persuaded them to believe that they honoured the Creator of all living and moving beings by worshipping as they liked. They were religious simpletons, and great perverts, only because they did not learn God’s law, and do it; and now left, so to say, to themselves, wherever they go their characteristics will appear like the stamp of a divine signet, a mark from the finger of God upon them : “ Ephraim is turned to idols, let him alone.” 124 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. They are still to be looked for as separatists, prose- lytizers, and idolaters, and yet with high pretensions to priestly purity ; having, as of old, colleges and con- vents for unmarried prophets and prophetesses, monks and nuns ; believing in a Messiah ahvays present and always coming; blending a theocracy with a kingly power; neglecting all the institutions of God for for- malities of their own ; and strong and wrong alike in heart and head, madly deifying their own ideas, and taking their dreams for oracles. In consequence of not distinguishing the God of all the prophecies and all the promises from such gods as Egypt and Assyria honoured, they confound the Branch of renown, the Branch of righteousness foretold by their true prophets, with the fabulous traditions of heathendom. The hopes of restoration from the Fall through the perfect offshoot of the tree of life in Paradise, the holy seed of the woman, are merged and lost in confusions without record ; and so, in imitation of their Assyrian captors, they hold up the branch to their nose before a figurative god, in honour of their own conceits as a people worthy of especial favour. Their habits of idolatry are so ingrafted as to be rooted in their stock and incorporated with all the outgrowths of their life. It was always with them as it is with ourselves, all promises of amendment were in vain, because made in self-dependence and with neglect of the expressed will and written word of God. Pride even took the garb of Divine benevolence, and compassed sea and land to proselytize the abject kindreds of humanity; but, like the self-appointed mission of Satan into Eden, it is only the propagandism of a restless spirit CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. 125 that converts the weak, ignorant, naked, and sim- ple dependents upon Providence and Mercy, into will- worshippers endeavouring to reach up to Heaven by the use of their own wits, unrestrained by the dictations of the Wisdom that in love would rule them by truth from His own lips. It is for such a people we are to look, and we shall find traces of their influence to the world’s end. But the prophets of Jehovah, who warned them, and now warn us, have afforded us light, by which we learn that the people thus made outcasts of their own accord, while endea- vouring to establish an all-embracing kingdom in the name of the God of truth and love, only succeed in establishing delusions in their progress, and in the end are themselves lost altogether as a nation, never to be recalled into existence, but as by the Voice that awakens the dead, and says to the dry bones live, and to the sleepers in the dust arise. It is said of Israel (Hos. viii. 5, 9), “ Thy calf, 0 Samaria , hath cast thee off ; mine anger is kindled against them; how long will it he ere they attain inno- cency ; for from Israel was it also ; the workman made it; therefore it is not God; hut the calf of Samaria shall he broken in pieces. For they have sown the wind , and they shall reap the whirlwind; it hath no stalk ; the bud shall yield no meal ; if so he it yield , the strangers shall swallow it up. Israel is swallowed up : now shall they he among the Gentiles as a vessel wherein is no pleasure ; for they are gone up to Assyria , a wild ass alone [ttq] by himself.” This state of loneliness or, literally, Buddhism, is to be the characteristic of Israel in Assyria. Here is an abrupt and inexplicable 126 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. reference to the bud of green corn which should be unfruitful to them, and the product of which should be devoured by strangers. They looked for fruitful- ness in the development of their idolatry, but all they gathered was to be consumed by the strangers, amongst whom like a wild ass they should wander. This appears to have been precisely the result of Israel’s separation. We have supposed them scat- tered by the whirlwind, and now their own religion, and chosen idols, cast them off; and while those whom they indoctrinated seized the good and bad of their instruction, they themselves sink into helpless- ness and degradation, and wither away, becoming no longer recognisable as a people called of God to do wonders. The remainder of this volume will show why especial emphasis is laid on the state of separa- tion, and yet commingling absorption, in which these people are to exist. The Israelites practised idolatry in high places, and associated the idea of Jehovah as the higjiest Being; with the idea of height in a literal sense; and thus thought to honour God by erecting altars on the highest points they could reach, just as the Druids and the old patriarchal worshippers appear to have done before them. Hence their attachment to hills and mountains. In their first revolt from the house of David, when they cried, “ What portion have we in David? To your tents, 0 Israel; now see to thine own house, David,” Jeroboam, in order to win them back, met their general inclination to idolatry in high places by building altars in high places for them. In Bethel and Dan he placed golden calves, saying, CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. 127 “ Behold thy gods, 0 Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt.” (1 Kings xii. 28.) Thus we see that the worship in high places, and the idola- try of the sacred calf or heifer, which both prevail in India, were also the sins of revolted Israel. In this form of veneration for high places and the sacred heifer, they were in sympathy with many other Oriental idolaters; and it is not unlikely that this dis- position to worship on eminences, or at least to vene- rate lofty elevations, may have induced some of the Israelites to have chosen the - neighbourhood of the Himalayas for their abode, as if thus to see God on His throne, and abide in the presence they adored. The very name Himalayas, or Heavenly mountains, indicates the fact that the Eastern nations associated sacred ideas with the immaculate snows of those sub- lime and inaccessible heights, bearing up as if upon pillars of “ terrible crystal” the very firmament of heaven, on the starry floor of which the throne of the Eternal for ever stood. Amongst these mountains all the Eastern nations believe Paradise still stands. Here is the home of their gods ; here departed spirits pass for retribution ; thence are sent the good and evil genii that divide all the regions of the world between them. Here, too, it is that the physio-phi- losophers have supposed mankind to have originated when the earth began to emerge from the fervid sea. And here we shall find traces of the outcast tribes. To these mountains, also, we trace home the streams of the Gothic and Saxon nations, who all call their heaven by the Oriental name. Thus, in Mteso-Gothic (400 a.d.), Heaven is Himin ; in Alemannic (720), 128 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. Himele ; in Frankie (900), Hirnile ; in Old German (1300), Humele ; in recent German, Himmel. The most remarkable word for Heaven, however, is that of the Old Saxon (900 a.d.), namely, Himil-arikea * which is a combination of the Sanscrit word Himil , Heaven, with the Hebrew word signifying the ex- panse. (Gen. i. 6.) This one word, connected as it is with many others of the same origin, will serve inci- dentally to confirm the observations offered in our fourth chapter. It was said by the prophet Hosea concerning the Israelites, “ They shall go with their j locks and herds to seek the Lord ; hut they shall not find him ” (v. 6). He also saj’s that, as a result of their own counsels, they should refuse to return from under the Assyrian king. (Hos. xi. 6.) Though they were warriors, they were also shepherds; and, like the girdled Shepherd- kings of Egypt, they took their flocks with them in their wanderings, and their families were fed on butter and milk from land to land. The neighbour- hood of mountains was thus most favourable to their progress, as affording shelter from foes in case of need, being comparatively little inhabited, having sufficient grass, and where the streams, though more numerous, were more easily fordable. The Sacae are located on the north of the Himalayas by Strabo and Ptolemy ; but we shall presently trace them also into the south. "Where, also, Dionysius (Anc. Myth, vol. iii. p. 226), as rendered by Bryant, says — “ Upon the banks of the great river Ind The southern Saithse [or Sacae] dwell.” * See M. Mallet’s Northern Antiquities (Bohn), p. 47. CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. 129 In ideally looking over the localities associated with the Israelitish people, two places of similar character and name occur to memory : one the province called Bhutan, in Koordistan, and through which a river Chebar flows; the other in India, at the further ex- tremity of the Himalayas. This word Bhutan, or Bhootan, is peculiar, and its derivation appears to be very obscure. The inhabitants of Tibet Proper and Tangut are all called Bhots, from their religion being derived from Bhootan or Butan. The names of places serve as a clue to the people dwelling in them, exiles and wanderers bearing with them thus a record of their former home. Thus the Pilgrim Fathers took with them the familiar names of places dear to them in Old England, and thus throughout the new world of America the names of cities, towns, and hamlets famous or beloved in Europe are repeated, to remind the growing nations of the lands of their fathers. So, doubtless, was it with the wandering tribes of Israel, and hence we may be able to associate this name Bhotan with them. We will first endeavour to account for the origin of the name in Koordistan, a country so called after the Karduchi, who now in- habit it. Koordistan is the name now given to the country anciently known as Atyria, or Assyria. This country, according to Ptolemy, was bounded on the north by Armenia; on the west, by the Tigris; on the south, by Susiana; and on the east, by Media and the mountains of Choatra and Zagros. It was probably into this country that the captive Israelites for the most part were conducted by the kings of Assyria. (1 Chron. v. 26.) On the first occasion the K 130 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. Reubenites, the Gadites, and the half-tribe of Manasseh were thus exiled ; but afterwards the remainder of the Ten Tribes were forced by the conqueror Shalmaneser to follow their brethren. (2 Kings xvii. 6; xviii. 11.) Now, if we compare the statements in the book of Chronicles with that in the book of Kings, we shall receive a clearer idea of the localities occupied by the banished tribes. It is said that Tiglath-Pileser “brought them into Halah, and Habor, and Hara, and to the river Gozan” (1 Chron. v. 28); and that Shalmaneser placed his captives in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes. (2 Kings xvii. 6; and xviii. 11.) By this comparison we discover, as before stated, that the captives were on each occasion conducted to the same localities and became again as one people, after an interval of twenty years from their separation in Samaria. There is, however, a little difficulty in the use of the word Hara, which occurs only in relation to the first division of the captivity. The word is in italics in our translation, as if it were expletive, and it is generally understood to have been added as a gloss to indicate that the part of the country in which the exiles dwelt was the mountainous region about the Habor. Gesenius renders the passage clearly and literally thus : “ He placed them in Halah and on the Chabor, a river of Gozan.” In our authorized trans- lation we should understand at first sight that Gozan was a river. We, however, have a proof in the 2nd book of Kings (xix. 12), and also in Isaiah (xxxvii. 12), that it was a country and not a river; for Sennacherib is represented as boasting that his CHARACTERISTICS, TKACES, NAMES. 131 fathers had destroyed Gozan, which certainly could not be said of a river. “ The country to which the Ten Tribes were deported is one of the most moun- tainous in the world,” says Dr. Grant. “ As the in- habitants of Gozan and Haran had first been destroyed or driven out, it is reasonable to infer that the Ten Tribes had entire possession of this region. Its natural strength would enable them to maintain their position entirely distinct.” It is the very country in which the 10,000 Greeks had the greatest difficulties to endure in their triumph and retreat. Gozan was probably that part of Kurdistan now known by the name of Buhtan, or Bhutan. This transformation in the name probably occurred very early, and was, it may be, introduced by the exiles themselves. Whe- ther so or not, it is well known that the common Aramean pronunciation of the letters G-o-z-a-n would convert them into Bhutan; for, as Gesenius shows, the Hebrew g , or gh , is most frequently interchanged with its kindred palative b , or 6/q and the £, named tsade, tsad, zad, or even dad, is interchanged with any of the consonants included in its sound. Hence, then, the conversion of the word Gozan into Bhotan. We shall see the bearing of this derivation when we come to inquire concerning the people named Botans. There is a river, a branch of the Tigris, named Habor, or Chabor, still running through the borders of that province, and giving the name of Chabur to part of the country through which it runs. Ammianus mentions the Chebar under the name of Abor.* It is curious to trace this name : in Isidorus it is * Am. lib. xiv. c. iv., and note, edit. Lud. 1693. K t 132 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. Habouran ; in Strabo, Haborras ; in Zosimus, Habo- ran ; in Procopius, Haborrhas ; in Ptolemy, Chabdras ; in Theopliylactus Simocatus, H abb or as ; and, lastly, the Turks call it Alchabur , which is very nearly the scriptural name, the al being the definite article. The ancient geography of the Euphrates and the Tigris is open to much dispute, but this is the fact to our present purpose. There is an extensive district called Bhutan, and a river named Chebur, Chebor, or Abor, in the country where some at least of the Ten Tribes once dwelt. This country of Bhutan is both mountainous and pastoral, well watered, and abound- ing in grass. Xenophon, in his retreat with the ten thousand Greeks, passed over the Chebar, on his way from Batrai to the plains of Zakko, or Sacho. It must have been in these plains that the Israelites, the sons of Isaac, mostly dwelt during their captivity. It is here at least that Ezekiel conferred with their elders. This name Sacho seems to be the same as Sukhi and Saakka, as already indicated. If we would discover relics of the exiled Israelites, we should, therefore, dig among the ruins of the ancient Zacho, the name of a town and a country on the banks of this Chebur. The mounds and ruins of Bhutan are numerous, and would, doubtless, repay a Layard for any amount of exploration. There is another Bhutan at the north-east of Hin- dustan, and another Abor, or Chabor, immediately adjacent; and these regions are in character very similar to those of Kurdistan. This itself is re- markable; but it would be still more so, if we could discover traces of the Israelites in this neighbourhood CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. 133 also; and this we shall. But it will enlarge our view of the marvellous proceedings of divine Providence, if we endeavour to obtain some glimpses of their transit to that land. The only distinct intimation of the exodus of the Israelites from Assyria which we possess, assures us that they went out under the influence of religious zeal, with the purpose of separating themselves from heathenism. We suppose they attempted to effect this distinct standing under a name not recognised as connecting them with Jews, and that they jour- neyed into the regions north-east of the Caspian, hoping to establish themselves and their religion in some land in that direction. They go forth in a vain hope ; they depart further and further from the place of God’s manifestation to their fathers; they turn away from Judea and Jerusalem, perhaps believing that its walls will never again be erected, or that the glory of Jehovah will never more appear there. The temple was not dear to them when in their own land., and in their rebellion against the seed of David they rejected the hopes Avhich the Spirit in the prophets had associated with that royal line.* It was their temper always to build temples at their own discre- tion, and to erect altars to gods of their own choosing upon high places and in groves. As Hosea, their especial prophet, told them, u Because Ephraim hath made many altars to sin , altars shall be unto him to sin" (viii. 11). The Israelites, that is, the Ten Tribes, * “ Howbeit the Lord will not destroy the bouse of David, because of the covenant that he made with David, and as he promised to give light to him and his sons for ever.” (2 Chron. xsi. 2-4.) 134 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. seem to have revolted in their confidence of blessing in connexion with Ephraim, hence their name, Ephraimites. The birthright was Joseph’s — Reuben’s birthright was given to Joseph. “ Judah prevailed above his brethren, and of him came the chief ruler ; but the birthright was Joseph’s.” (1 Chron. v. 1, 2.) The Jews, or Judeans, are first named, as distinct from the Beni-Israel, in 2 Kings xvi. 6. What could these accomplish, except the establishment of some new form of idolatry? We might probably, with great propriety, adopt the description given of them by Zechariah (v. 6), as especially applicable to this people now. They hide the woman within an ephali — they conceal true religion under a mysterious dis- guise — they cover her down with a weight of lead.* Being carried away, as on the wings of a stork, by two false forms of religion, in which the natural affec- tions and the instincts alone lift the soul up between heaven and earth — elevated by fancies, but without a I faith in which to rest — they hurry away from the Land of Promise, burying the truth under a dull and heavy and dead idolatry. They build temples to falsehood, and attempt to honour God by disobedience to his law. * The reference to wings reminds us of the Assyrian and Egyptian emblem of power and protection. The wings of a stork are especially sig- nificant, as that bird was celebrated by the ancients for its affection to its parents. The word translated stork means pious, confiding, kind, loving, in the sense in which pius was used by the Latins. Hence the appropriateness of applying it to that form of religion in which veneration and even adora- tion of parents constitutes a remarkable feature, as amongst the Buddhists of China and elsewhere, for they regard their departed parents as guardian deities to whom they look for blessings. It is remarkable that the prophet states that the ephah shall be borne into the land of Shinar, and built there upon her own base (v. 11). CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. 135 They felt that law too broad and embracing for their libertine spirits, and then wrote statutes for them- selves a thousand times broader, and as formal, as false, and as useless as they were indefinite. (Zech. v. 6-11.) This may be regarded as a description of the religion founded by the grand prophet of the Sakai race, who introduced Buddhism into India. This religion is a mixture of the truths of the patriarchal dispensation with the forms of heathenism, with which they were familiar, and especially with the higher idolatries of the Brahmins and of the worshippers of the elements, making of the . mixture that form of Buddhism now prevalent in the East. In the history or chronicles of Cashmir,* as recorded by native authorities, we find that the Hindus date the commencement of a remarkable era amongst them, from the time when the prince Asoka abolished Brah- minical rites, and substituted those of Jina Sassana. Now we know that the new religion of Asoka was that of the Sacas , or Sacce; and here we find that religion called Sassana; so that we have evidence from native authority that Sassana signifies what pertains to the Sacce , and is in fact equivalent to our word Saxon , as we surmised when speaking of the Parthian dynasty named the Sassani , which extended its power so widely over India. The Sacas , then known as Sassani , or Saxons, conveyed their religion into the country of Asoka. There is nothing insuper- able to this opinion in the dates that have been hitherto established. This Sakian era appears to have commenced about 307 years before Christ. The # Asiatic Researches, vol. xv. Paper by H. TV. Wilson. 136 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. chronology of such records is, however, very un- certain, and only to be verified by concurrent testi- mony. This much is, however, certain — about that time the Saca era began in India. During the reign of Asoka that country was overrun by the Sacas, who, according to the Ay in Acberi, were expelled by his successor Jaloca. We find that country afterwards divided under three princes of Scythian extraction, named in the Chronicle Hushca, Tushca, and Canishca, who are stated to have reigned about 150 years after the death of Sakya-sinha , the founder of Buddhism as at present existing. Thus we learn from the chronicle two interesting facts; first, that the Sacas came into India and founded Buddhism; secondly, that the Sacas were connected with Scythians, but properly distinguished from them. As Professor Wilson, in the article referred to, observes, “ the dates only corroborate the general fact, that at some remote period the Scythians [or rather the Sacas] did govern Cashmir, and gave their sanction to the reli- gion of Buddhism.” About the year 720 a.d. Lali- taditya, King of Cashmir, warred against his Bud- dhist neighbours, and overran Nepal and Bhotan with his conquering armies. These facts serve to connect all those places with the Sakai race and the Sakai religion. Here we might recur to the traditions of Cashmir, from which we learn that the people of that country suppose themselves generally to be descended from a race who came from Turkestan, and who taught them their religion. With this relation, however, they mix up the notion that Solomon, King of Israel, CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. 137 visited them, and that Moses himself came amongst them to teach them the worship of one God. All these remarkable traditions are easily reconciled with the fact that they were really instructed in certain ideas peculiar to the religion and history of the Israelites, and that the people that thus taught them were known under the names of Sakai, and came from Turkestan, the country of the Sacae. It is clear from records concerning the King Sagara, that he drove the M’lech’chas and Sacas into Nepal, Assam, and Bhutan, and endeavoured to re-establish the old Brahminical religion. Now, it is worthy of especial remark that this king, Avhen he destroyed the insti- tutes of the M'lech'chas (foreigners) in his kingdom, ordered the heads of the Sacas to be partly shaved, while all the hair was ordered to be removed from the heads of the Yavanas and the Canibogas , while the Paradas were compelled to wear beards. These were all mixed up with the Sacas; and, though differing somewhat in their forms of worship, they were all Buddhists. If these Sacas or Sakai were Israelites, here was a literal fulfilment of prophecy with respect to them. Baldness and beardlessness were signs of mourning amongst the Hebrews; but the prophets declare that, in their apostate state, to be bald and shaven shall be the signs of their degradation. In- stead of well-set hair, baldness. (Isai. iii. 24.) Bald, ness shall be upon all their heads. (Ezek. vii. 18 and Amos viii. 10.) As these tyrannical orders were endured and submitted to with a religious pride, and as a proof of unflinching attachment to their own faith by those subjected to them, we should naturally 138 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. expect these peculiarities, thus at first despotically enforced by this bluff Harry of the East, to be after- wards preserved amongst the marked tribes as honourable badges of their faith ; and this is precisely what we find at the present day. The partial shaving of the head is retained as a peculiar mark amongst most of the Buddhists, while with many an entirely naked head is more in honour. These peculiarities, so tenaciously preserved, may hereafter aid us to identify the existing races of the East with those from whom they derived their religious peculiari- ties. Probably we shall not experience much difficulty in identifying the Sacas here spoken of, seeing that classic historians have taught us to associate the name with that nation of so-called Scythians which we have endeavoured to show are likely to have sprung from the house of Isaac. And now this chronicle of Cashmir, together with the traditions of that country, enable us to connect the Sacas at once with Hebraism and Buddhism, and to trace them from the north. The Yavanas may at once receive our attention, as they appear remarkably mixed with the Sacas , not only in Cashmir, but much further to the south. Thus, in the early history of Orissa, the records called the Panji assure us that a mighty man name Salivahana Saca liar a* or Saca Deo Raja , came from the north with a large army and conquered the country of Delhi, and fixed his empire there ; and that from this period the era named Saca'hda , or the * Hara was the name of a province to which part of Israel was de- ported. (1 Chron. v. 8.) CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. 139 era of Saca, began.* It appears that some of these Sacas became afterwards confounded or mixed up with the Yavanas , and it is not unlikely that some of the Sacas really accompanied the Yavanas in their inroads on the south of India. There can be no doubt that the term Yavanas was originally applied to the troops of Alexander the Great, especially those veterans that he left to garrison the country on his return to the west. “ The cavalry of this conquerqj; were many of them Sacs.” The historians of Orissa state that in the reign of Bajranath Deo the Yavanas invaded that country, and that they came from Babul Des ; that is, the country of Babylon, from which Alexander did come. With this is mixed up a strange story of a large army from Himarut. These names were probably obtained from the Yavanas themselves, and they at once conduct us to the kingdom of Baby- lon and the kingdom of Armenia, with which both the Sacas and Yavanas were familiar. Through these countries Alexander entered on his Eastern conquests. The Yavanas reached Orissa through Cashmir and Delhi. Now, on recurring to the history of Cashmir, we find that the M'lech'chas , of whom the Sacas were one class, came to that country from Scythia, and mingled with the Yavanas. Buchanan says f that the Yavanas are understood to be Europeans. The term Yavanas seems to have puzzled Oriental scholars; but when we consider that the Yavanas and Jabans are synonymous, we are at once conducted to an explanation; and turn, as a matter of course, to * Stirling’s Account of Orissa, p. 21. Asiatic Researches, vol. xv. f Buchanan’s Res. vol. iii. chap. xv. p. 133. 140 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. the country of Javan or Jaban, which includes great part of Asia Minor, the isles of Greece and all Ionia. Ionia , in fact, is only another form of the name Yavana ; and thus Rawlinson, finding the word Yavana in the arrow-headed inscriptions of Behistun, does not scruple to translate it Ionians. To associate this name with the veterans of Alexander’s army and the Seleucidas is natural; and we have reason to be- t ve, from the history of Alexander’s invasion, that )ops of Sacee were in his pay and among the bravest of his companions. In fact, the Sacco were so well known in Alexander’s time as brave cavalry and bowmen, that the term seems to have been adopted to designate the best mercenary forces. The dominion of Seleucus Nicator, and Antiochus Soter, in Bactria, extended over the Sacas at first, but was afterwards destroyed by them and the Goths, who forthwith unitedly ruled over the whole of the provinces ex- tending from Bactria to the Indus. The mixtures of Sacs with Javanas is then explained. Here we can- not but observe the wonderful providence by which it was so ordered that the descendants of Japhet, brought ready-armed and trained by Alexander into India, should there meet and sustain the Sacas and M'lech' chas from Scythia, and thus advance the ful- filment of prophecy. It is also interesting, and perhaps not without im- portance, that the nations of India, at an early period of their history, were accustomed to designate the Western World by the name of Javan , who was the representative and grandson of Japhet, and the founder of the race now most influential on the CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. 141 earth. It is not a slight privilege to be taught to look for the fulfilment of Divine purpose and predic- tions in all the ongoings of Providence in the form of history; and happy is the man who sees and feels that Wisdom is regulating the distribution of mankind with regard to glorious spiritual results. It is the bearing of the present on the coming world, in re- ference to the ultimate elevation of the whole race of mankind to a higher standing, that gives interest alike to the records of man and the prophecies of God. The prophecy of Noah will, we are convinced, become distinctly legible as the light of ethnology and of history falls on it. The merchant- princes of the Saxon nations are the descendants both of Japhet and of Shem, if, indeed, it be not found that a blending of the blood of the whole family of man, in a new form, as in England and America, be not necessary to the production of the most energetic and the most thoughtful, that is to say, the most inwardly devout, people on the earth. If the views we herein advance be correct, the descendants of Shem, religiously trained in all the trials of faith as the true seed of Abraham, have mingled with the hardiest and most independent and self-relying of the offspring of Japhet to constitute the Anglo-Saxons; and it may be that in our Western World beyond the wide Atlantic, now, so to say, brought near to the Old W orld by steam and electricity, the children of Ham have been with fraud and force enslaved by their more daring brethren to check the pride of Saxons, and with a burning re- proach to stir them up to the greatest and noblest of efforts, that thus they may practically declare, by 142 CHARACTERISTICS, TRACES, NAMES. all the self-sacrifices involved in their declaration of belief, that God has indeed made of one blood all the nations of the earth, that they may dwell toge- ther as brethren. In this desultory chapter we have seen the Sacae, whom we have assumed to be Israelites, coming from Bhutan, or Gozan, in Kurdistan, into the north, and then from the north into the south, exercising influ- ence, religious and civil, in India, mingled with Ionians there, these Sacae being recognised as Bud- dhists, and, then again scattered, some of them finding refuge in another Bhutan. This will serve as an outline now to be in part filled up. 243 CHAPTER VII. THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. We have endeavoured to find traces of the Tribes in the course indicated by prophecy. We have con- sidered their probable position in captivity, and their possible connexion with the Sacee of history. We have sought them under new names, and as professing a new religion ; we now proceed, if possible, to dis- cover evidences of their passage through the countries they must have traversed, if our surmises are well founded. We are attracted at once to a country of vast im- portance in the present aspect of the East, and the more interesting to us, as w T e there find a people who profess to be the Beni-Israel, or descendants of the Ten Tribes, namely, Afghanistan and the adjacent countries. The mountains of the Indian Caucasus, the mountains of Cabul, are said to be visible, in clear weather, from a distance of two hundred and fifty miles ; lifting their hoar heads sublimely into the clear calm heavens, they well represent “ the terrible crystal” of the prophet. Roving myriads of people have been attracted by this sight, as if to travel onwards and upwards, in imagination, along the mountain pathway, to the realms of glory and of rest. 144 THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. The traditions of the whole world celebrate these stupendous heights, many of whose light-crowned pinnacles are supposed to stand more than twenty thousand feet above the common level of this earth. Their magnificence and their mystery have drawn nations together in adoring wonder into the hills and valleys, so fruitful and bounteous and beautiful, around their feet. This region might well be thought the seat of Paradise. There are found specimens of nearly every form of living thing, whether animal or vegetable, elsewhere found in any country of Europe or of Asia; and there, too, almost every civilized nation has its representative. The oldest nations believe that thence mankind first sprang into exist- ence, and that God even now there sits enthroned, waiting to judge all the human souls which He has made. Greeks, Romans, Hebrews, Persians, the fol- lowers of Buddha, of Brahma, of Mahomet, and even believers in Jehovah, have looked up unto these awful solitudes, and bowed in soul before their majesty, thinking of God. Here was a high place (Bamah)* for the worshippers of Bamah worthy of the name, and here the wandering tribes might believe them- selves in the especial presence of Him who made the heavens and the earth. To the skirts of these moun- tain fastnesses many of the outcast Israelites un- doubtedly resorted after their escape from Assyrian or Persian domination, and after their wanderings in the north. Traces of their former possession of this neighbourhood, as well as of Bactria and Bok- * “ Then, I said unto them, What is the high place whereunto ye go ? And the name thereof is called Bamah unto this day.” (Ezek. xx. 29.) THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. 145 hara, are still extant, not only in existing - monuments, but also in the traditions of the power and majesty of a national religion and polity once capable of awakening the attention of all the East, but now lost in the mist of ages. The prominent reasons for thinking that certain classes of the people of Bokhara and Afghanistan are of Israelitish origin are these : — 1st. Their per- sonal resemblance to the Hebrew family. Thus Dr. Wolff, the Jewish missionary, says: “ I was wonder- fully struck with the resemblance of the Youssouf- szye [tribe of Joseph], and the Khybere, two of their tribes, to the Jews.” Moorcroft also says of the Ivhy- beres, “They are tall, and of singularly Jewish cast of features.” 2nd. They have been named by them- selves Beni-Israel, children of Israel, from time imme- morial. 3rd. The names of their tribes are Israelitish, especially that of Joseph, which includes Ephraim and Manasseh. In the Book of Revelation the tribe of Joseph stands for Ephraim. (Rev. vii. 6, 8.) In Numbers xxxvi. 5, Moses speaks of Manasseh as “ the tribe of the sons of Joseph;” so that it is clear that both Manasseh and Ephraim were known by the name of the tribe of Joseph. 4th. The Hebrew names of places and persons in Afghanistan are of far greater frequency than can be accounted for through Mahometan association ; and, indeed, these names existed before the Afghans became Mahometans. 5th. All accounts agree that they inhabited the mountains of Ghore from a very remote antiquity. It is certain that the princes of Ghore belonged to the Afghan tribe of Sooree, and that their dynasty was allowed to be of very great antiquity even in the L 146 THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. eleventh century. “ They seem early to have pos- sessed the mountains of Solimaun or Solomon,* com- prehending all the southern mountains of Afghan- istan.” (Elphinstone.) 6th. Afghan is the name given to their nation by others, the name they give their nation is Pushtoon, and Drs. Carey and Marsh- man assert that the Pushtoon language has more Hebrew roots than any other. 7th. The Afghans are also called Botans (or, by corruption, Patans). They account for this name by stating that they lived as Jews until the first century of Mahometism, when Kaled the caliph summoned them to fight against the infidels. Their leader, Kyse, on that occasion, was styled Botan, or mast. This word is Arabic, and signifies the possession of authority, and, indeed, the staff held in the hand as a sign of authority, such as the marshal’s staff, is so called by ourselves; and the term baton was derived, through the French, from the East, during the Crusades. A staff was used as a sign of authority by the ancient Israelites. This name was adopted by all the Mahometan conquerors of India, and the present Mahometan leaders of the Indian rebellion are proud to be called Botans, or Patans, meaning thereby that they are the first, or highest caste of men. Another derivation of the name Botan has been already given, and the name is shown to have existed in northern India before the Mahometan incursion ; the modern use of the term is, however, a consistent appropriation. The more ancient name of Afghanistan was Cabul, and it still retains * The fact that the highest peak of this range is called Solomon’s throne fixes the derivation of the name by which these mountains are known. THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. 147 this name as a kingdom. Now it is very remarkable that Ptolemy, in his geography of these parts, locates the Aristophyli , that is to say, “The Noble Tribes,” in juxtaposition with the Cabolitce ; a name which probably also means the tribes, Cabail being the Arabic for tribe. Cabul was the name applied by Hiram to the land of Galilee, or that part of it containing the cities which Solomon gave him. (1 Kings ix. 13.) The Talmud tells us the word signifies sandy ; and this term certainly would well apply to much of Afghanistan. The antiquity of the name of the country Cabul, or Cabool, is then established; and it is also shown that some peculiar people known as “ The Tribes,” and “The Noble Tribes,” dwelt there at a very re- mote period. There is, therefore, good evidence that the present inhabitants of Cabul may be justified in asserting that from the earliest period of history they and their ancestors have occupied Cabul, and that from time immemorial they have been known as “ The Tribes.” That is to say, Israelitish tribes, such as they now assume themselves to be. It is no mean argument in favour of their assumption that their Mahometan conquerors assert by their histo- rians, that the Afghans are Israelites, and that they observed the Hebrew worship until the seventh century, when they were converted by the sword of the Arab to the profession of belief in the Prophet of Mecca. According to Sir W. Jones, the best Persian authorities agree with them in their account of their origin; and resident and competent authorities, such as Sir John Malcolm, and the missionary Mr. Cham- l 2 148 THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. berlain, after full investigation, assure us that “many of the Afghans are undoubtedly of the seed of Abra- ham.” One tribe of the Afghans, now named Door- anneds, rules the whole nation, and at one period of their history this tribe exercised dominion from the Caspian Sea to the Ganges, and even as far as the capital of the Mahrattas, Poona.* Thus, then, we succeed in connecting the Israelites — the Tribes — with the Caspian Sea, and with India through Afghan- istan. Now we require to proceed further, and connect these tribes with the Sacas. This we do at once by the fact well known that the so-called Tartar tribes, the Chozars or Kosi, were the lords of central India from the sixth to the tenth century. They came from the borders of the Caspian Sea, the seat of the Sacm. Gibbon states that their country was known to the Greeks and the Arabians under the name Kosa, that is, Cush. By this name they were also known to the Chinese. Their alliance was courted by the rival empires of Persia and Rome. The Cush, or Cosa, known as Indu-Cush, belonged to them, and probably gave rise to their name amongst the Greeks and Arabians. The circumstance most worthy of note concerning these Chozars, or Kusites, as respects our inquiry, is the fact that, as early as the tenth century we learn that their sovereigns had from time immemorial been Hebrews. The Beni- Israel of Malabar, also, have a history, clearly written, well preserved and continued to the present time, in which it is recorded that the Ten Tribes, with the exception of colonies in Spain and India, migrated * See Elpkinstone’s Kingdom of Caboul. THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. 149 towards the Caspian Sea, some on the borders of Media and Persia, and others in the direction of Chinese Tartary. The tribes of Simeon, Ephraim, and Manasseh are represented to have settled on the north-east of the Caspian Sea, the country of the Chozar Tartars, in a region named in the record Makhe.* Thus we have evidence sufficient to prove that a people who were connected with the country of the Sacae and under Hebrew rulers, held dominion over Central India and Afghanistan previous to the Mahometan invasion. Mr. Forster points out, as a curious confirmation of the Malabar record of the Beni-Israel, that Ptolemy places the Tos Manassa (“ The far-banished Manasseh ”) in the land of the Chomari or Gomeri (the' Gomer of the Bible), and to the north of them a people called Macha-geni , or people of Macha. May it not be worthy of inquiry whether Macha-geni, as the name of a people, is not the same as Massa-getae? And may not the country named Mash in Genesis (x. 23) be that of the Massa-getae (the Goths of Masha), who dwelt about the mouth of the Araxes or Kir, where we know from Herodotus that Cyrus encountered them? And may not the very name of these people (Getae) be derived from that of the inhabitants of Gath (Hebrew, \ro — Gete). Incidentally we remark that Hero- dotus (iv. 94) says the Getae thought themselves immortal; not dying, but going, at their decease, to Zalmoxis , which Herodotus supposes to be the name of a god. Is not this a Greek mode of spelling the Hebrew word Zalmoth, the shadow of death. (Psalm * See Forster on Primeval Language. 150 THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. xxiii. 4.) The Get® are mixed up with the Sacae as the Gittites were with the Israelites, and by and bye we shall see that they used the same language. The Ma?so-Gothic of Ulphilas’s New Testament, written in the fourth century, contains Hebrew, Greek, Sanscrit, and Tartar words. There were Gittites (Getas), men of Gath, amongst the body-guard of David. It is also worthy of note that, in the voyage of Eldad, the seat of the three lost tribes of Simeon, Ephraim, and Manasseh is said to be Macha ; a name agreeing per- fectly with that given in the Malabar history as the locality of those tribes. Whether, with Mr. Forster, we can find Zebulun by the Helmund , and Issachar by the Isagurus near Cashgar, remains to be proved. We agree with him in believing that “ by every kind of evidence it is ascertained, and by every class of author admitted, that a large proportion of the Chozar Tartars were Israelites professing the Jew’s religion, and practising the rite of circumcision.”* There is a curious Rabbinical tradition to the effect that the Ten Tribes passed over the river Sambatioun, which flows through the land of Cush. Now, what- ever river may be meant by Sambatioun, we know the Rabbins meant by Cush not Ethiopia or Libya, as some Christian commentators have imagined, but Indu-Cush, the country bordering on Bokhara and Cabul. Herodotus distinguishes the Ethiopians, the Cushites of the sun- rising, the eastern Ethio- pians, from those of Libya; and says they differed from the latter by their hair being straight instead of curly, and that they did not at all differ in appearance * Primeval Language, part iii. p. 312. TIIE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. 151 from other Indians. Mr. Forster, by limiting the distribution of the Ten Tribes of Israel to Afghan- istan, confirms prophecy but to falsify it ; for prophecy declares that they “ shall be swallowed up” amongst all nations. Not lost, indeed, but hidden, like seed, only to become more. “ I will not utterly destroy the house of Jacob, saith the Lord. For, lo, I will command and will sift the house of Israel among all nations, like as corn is sifted in a sieve, yet shall not the least grain fall upon the earth.” (Amos viii. 7-9.) “ Are ye not as children of the Ethiopians [Cushites] unto me, 0 children of Israel? saith the Lord.” (Amos ix. 7.) This is said in relation to their position after their captivity in Assyria, and we shall see in another chapter that the religious head amongst the Sacie assumed the Ethiopian characteristics as emblems of his dominion. We find in the heathen geographer clear names of Israelite tribes, on the one hand, on the borders of the Caspian Sea ; on the other hand, in the mountains of Chinese Tartary. We find the Jewish account quite independently bearing witness to the emigration and settlement of the very tribes named by Ptolemy in those very parts. We find the national character of those wandering Israelites correspond- ingly delineated in the accounts of the Jews, and in the history of the Chozars. And we find the very national character of Israel, as there described, in its restlessness, its turbulence, its roving propensities, its insatiable appetite for war and plunder, re-appear in all its life and reality in that of the whole Afghan nation — a people naming themselves “ Beni-Israel,” and universally claiming to be the descendants of the 152 THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. Lost Tribes. The nomenclature of those tribes and districts, both in ancient geography and at the present day, confirms this universal national tradition. Lastly, we have the route of the Israelites from Media to Afghanistan and India marked out by a series of intermediate stations bearing the names of several of their tribes, and clearly indicating the stages of their long and arduous journey. Sir William Jones in- clines to the opinion that the Ten Tribes migrated to India about Tibet and Cashmir: and that opinion derives support from several circumstances. In the year 1828 the following statement appeared in the German papers : — ■ “ Leipsig, June 30th. — After having seen for some years past merchants from Tiflis, Persia, and Armenia among the visitors at our fair, we have had, for the first time, two traders from Bucharia with shawls, which are there manufactured of the finest wool of the goats of Tibet and Cashmire, by the Jewish [ Israelitish ] families , who form a third part of the population. In Bucharia (formerly the capital of Sogdiana) the Jews have been very numerous ever since the Babylonian captivity, and are there as re- markable for their industry and manufactures as they are in England for their money transactions. It was not till last year that the Russian government suc- ceeded in extending its diplomatic missions far into Bucharia. The above traders exchanged their shawls for coarse and fine woollen cloths of such colours as are most esteemed in the East.” The number of these Israelites must be very great, if the account be at all correct, as to the proportion THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. 153 which they bear to the whole population, this being stated by the most accurately informed writers to be from 15,000,000 to 18,000,000. But this information is confirmed in a very satisfactory manner from other sources. With regard to the country of Bok- hara, it is worthy of remark that certain Jewish writers have regarded it as the Hara into which some of the Israelites were exiled by the King of Assyria. This country appears to have been known in India at an early period by the name of Hara; the addi- tion Bok, or Buck, only distinguishes it from some other notable Hara (mountain range). As Hara is Hebrew, so is Bok, signifying mixed or confused. At an early period of history the dominion of Bokhara extended from the Caspian Sea into Khorasan ; and when Seleucus, after Alexander’s death, took posses- sion of those regions, many Jews went there as colo- nists, and their progeny have ever since continued there, but kept distinct from the Beni-Israel, also resident there in large numbers. Yahoodeyah , in Merv, was probably one of their early cities. It is not unlikely that the seats of early Jewish coloniza- tion amongst people to whom the name of the Beni- Israel was familiar, were always known as Yahoode- yah , and this is precisely 7 the name by which Oude was first known. The Jews, both of Bokhara and Afghanistan, are kept distinct from those who call themselves Beni-Israel. When Sir Alexander Burnes asked Dost Mahomed Khan as to the descent of the Afghans from the Israelites, he replied that his people had no doubt of that, though they repudiated the idea of being Jews, whom they treat with hereditary 154 THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. contempt. They found their belief not merely on tradition, but on an ancient record in their possession named Mujnoo i unsab. The Urz Bede, of Hajee Feroz, at Herat, possesses genealogies tracing their descent from famous Israelites. True, the claim of the Afghans is no proof of their right to the name of Beni-Israel : but their claim, so long maintained, proves this much at least — the Ten Tribes must have been famous in those parts at a very early period, or a dominant people, despising the Jews, would not have been proud of their assumed name for so long a period. The incidental evidences in favour of the descent of the Afghans from the Ten Tribes, or from some of them, are : First. They are found where the Ten Tribes were expected to be found. Second. Their traditions and customs. Third. The agreement of their traditions with those of other Mahometans, who assert that the Israelites that came from the river Kliabor were called Khyberees, and that some of them went to Afghanistan, or, as they more properly call the country, Cabul, while others went into Arabia, and that these acknowledge their relationship to the Afghans. These traditions of the Afghans fall in with the O history of the tribes who resisted the Greeks, and took possession of Media and Persia, and constituted a Parthian kingdom. When Arsaces the Second, Artabanus, son of the First, fought against Antiochus, he called in the aid of the Sac® ; and being then at the head of 100,000 men, Antiochus was glad to make peace with him, leaving him in possession of Parthia and Ilyrcania, in consideration of his aid in the war THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. 155 against Bactria and Aria — that is to say, Bokhara and Afghanistan; thence, however, the Sacae and the Goths afterwards expelled the armies of the Greeks. The Arsacian king, Mithridates II., called the Great, came to terms with the Sacae, who held dominion in Cabul. The Saka-rauli became so power- ful as to place a king on the Parthian throne called king of kings. These Saka-rauli were probably Af- ghans, having descended from the north-eastern borders of Sogdiana, through Bactria, into the country then known as Ariana, now Afghanistan. These are the people, the Sacae, that Alexander could not subdue, and therefore courted as friends. Prom that period to that of the last of the numerous Greeks who assumed sovereignty over Bactria and Cabulistan, these people were in frequent conflict with the Greeks, and as often nominally under their dominion, as we find from their numerous coins discovered in Afghan- istan (Cabulistan), on which both Greek and so-called Arian inscriptions and devices appear.* Professor Lassen quotes this passage from Strabo : “ The Asii or Asiani, and the Tochari and the Saca-rauli, took Bactria from the Greeks.” The Asiani were the kings of the Tochari and the Saca-rauli. The Asiani were Sacae. I regard these names as only different classes of Saks recognisable in Hebrew as '"inn and ; that is, those who superintended, those distinguished by their armour N"inn (Ex. xxviii. 32), and the javelin men or slingers.f Coins of the Parthian “ kino; of kings ” have also been found in * See Prinsep’s Historical Results, deducible from Recent Discoveries in Afghanistan. f See Prinsep, p. 82. 156 THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. Afghanistan. Professor Lassen confines the Asian O kings of the Getas to Upper Bactria and Sogdiana, but regards the Sakas as occupying the Cabul valley and the Punjab, having a king of their own towards the end of the second century before Christ. This serves as another link between the ancient Sakas and the modern Afghans, and this is all we wish here to establish, having already shown the probability that the Afghans are of Hebrew descent. For the purpose of showing the connexion of the Greek power with the Saxon, the annexed engravings of coins found in Afghanistan are worthy of note. No. 1 is that ofEuthydemus— BA2IAEQ2 EY0YAHMOY- (b.c. 220.) The wild horse on the obverse is perhaps an emblem of Bactria, but also, certainly, of the Saxon race. No. 2 is that of Antiinachus Nike- phorus. (155 b.c.) The figure on the obverse, with the word Su . , will be illustrated in another chapter. Su has very much puzzled the learned. No. 3 is another of the same king, with a Victory (?) on one side ; and the king seated on the horse on the other, to indicate his conquest and power over the nation symbolized by the horse. This king as- sumed the title of Theus — God; and I would here observe that probabty the word Su , or Zu, is only another form ( Spartan ) of the word Theus ; adopted, however, with particular reference to the people of Afghanistan at the time, as will be indicated here- after. Nikepliorus is a title of Jupiter, but I believe not so applied till subsequent to the conquest of Porus, or Phorus, by Alexander in India. This word is both Greek and Hebrew, and in both languages would signify the smiting of Porus, this name Porus I. THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. 157 being a title of distinction in Hebrew, signifying widely known; a title appropriate enough to the Porus whom Alexander conquered on the banks of the Jhilum (now Jelum), in July, 327 b.c. On the coins found in Afghanistan, Greek legends are continued from Seleucus Nicator (280 b.c.) to the middle of the second century of our era. Having been once established by a people so superior in art and intelligence, the Greek character seems to have been retained on the coinage, partly as expressing the retention of the Greek power by the successive kings, and partly because Greeks were largely mixed as colonists with the nations over whom they reigned. Thus we have first pure Greek coins, next Arsacian, and then Sassanian, when the Greco- Parthian dominion in Central Asia closed. There was, during great part of this period, an Ario-Par- thian dynasty reigning over Cabul and the Punjab; but after a.d. 80 a new order of coins, bearing the name of Kanerkes, with legends in corrupt Greek, is found. These are ascribed to a new race of Scythian kings who immediately succeeded those named Kadphises, of which name three kings are recognised by their coins. I here present one of them (4 in plate) in evidence of the fact, that under his dominion Buddhism was recognised as the State religion. The Greek legend is king of kings, the great saviour, Oomen Kadphises,* the letters being very corrupt, and the z of the Lat inscriptions being used for that of the Greek 2. The legend on the obverse is in the so-called Arian, * No. 10, plate Lx. in Prinsep’s Historical Results. 158 THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. which reads from right to left.* No satisfactory translation has been offered ; but I transliterate the words into modern Hebrew letters, and thus find this Hebrew sentence : — abb tto -via “no bi ab mb® mno 'b bio^ '2 which literally translated is, From my glory prosperity extended to them all, light extended , hut only because his recompense was with me. It appears that, during the reign of Kadphises, Buddhism was for a time suppressed b}'- the Hindu king Nikramaditya and his successors. It was pro- bably then that Augustus Caesar received a letter in Greek from a king of those parts, calling himself Porus, praying for assistance. Whether this Porus received any aid or not is not known; but there is evidence before us that Roman influence was extended to the successors of Kadphises, namely, the Kanerki kings, who established a new order, though retaining Buddhism, as will be pointed out in another chapter. All these kings employed the Arian language, that is, the language of Afghanistan at that time. It appears, then, that the religion of Buddha, or Godama, was restored by the king whose remarkable effigies we have before us. There is another Kadphises, on the obverse of whose coins ( 5 in plate ) is this remarkable inscription in Arian letters :f Damma cacarata kuju lakasa saha saka Kadphises ; which, as Hebrew, I would render, Kadphises worships according to the cutting off [or covenant ] of the burning of Kasli , the seat of Saka. * Plate xiii. p. 14, in Prinsep’s Historical Results. f Prinsep, idem, plate ix. p. 10. THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. 159 I will not here attempt an explanation of these words, as their meaning will appear as we proceed. The identification of the Szu Scythians with the Asii, and these, again, with the Sacas, who took Bactria and afterwards occupied Afghanistan, will account for certain coins having the name of Azes and the title “ king of kings ” upon them. This title associates them with the kings who, up to the second century of our era, used the same title, and held dominion over the same country, and employed the same lan- guage, at least on their coins, and, as we shall by and bye see, also on their tombs. We hope to prove that this language is Hebrew, and therefore that the people of Afghanistan used Hebrew in the period extending from the commencement of the Greco-Bactrian dominion to the commencement of the third century of our era. By way of introduction to the next chapter, a few remarks on the coins before us will suffice. First, the superscription — 'the great king of kings — reminds us that Nebuchadnezzar, to whom Daniel the Jew was prime minister, employed the same title. (Dan. ii. 37 ; Ezra vii. 12; Ezek. xxvi. 7.) This title was adopted by the kings who followed Godaxna, or Saka, and adopted his doctrines. We shall by and bye give evidence to indicate how the monograms on those coins came to denote the Bud- dhist religion and dominion. One such is seen beside the king, who is bearded and arrayed in true Saxon style — long coat, boots, and cap; and he wears the royal fillet. Like a true Hebrew, he stands with head covered before the altar of incense — for such we sup- pose the stones raised four deep to signify, after the 160 THE AFGHANS AND THEIR AFFINITIES. Buddhist manner. He holds the trident, the Saxon token, in his right hand. This was not borrowed from Neptune — he borrowed it from the Saxons; but in either case it means the same thing — potentiality. Below his left hand is an unknown emblem, regarded by some as a club ; if so, an emblem of Hercules, the destroyer of evil-doers and the righter of the wronged, a figure of whom is seen on the Graeco- Arian coin No. 4. Hence we infer that the Buddhist kings adopted this emblem after the destruction of the Greek pow T er in North-western India. On the obverse, in one case, we have Siva (or Su ) also holding the emblem of Buddha’s power, as indicated by the monogram of Godama. Behind him stands the sacred bull Nandi honouring Buddha. On the other obverse we have what appears to be Hercules with his club and lion’s skin — the devices in each case being o expressive of the same power to set matters right by main force. Concerning one of the Kanerki kings we shall have occasion to speak when examining the remains found in his tomb. Enough has been said to indicate the connexion of Afghanistan with the Greeks, the Sacae, and the Buddhists, and we will now proceed to con- sider the Sacae and the Buddhists more fully. 161 CHAPTER Till. THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. In a former chapter it was intimated that the Israelites might have been classed by Herodotus amongst the tribes of Media, under the name of Buddhi; a name that re-appears in his account of tribes of Scythia. We now proceed to show that the Sacae were Bud- dhists and Hebrews. We have seen, from the facts already stated, that a peculiar people, known as the Sacs, or Sakai and Buddhii, arrived in India at a period about a hundred years after the return of the Jews from Assyria to Palestine. These people were mixed up with the Yavanas, who have been identified with the Greeks left by Alexander to garrison the banks of the Indus, and who long occupied a naval station at the mouth of that river, called Pattala, supposed to be the pre- sent Tatta. This took place about 325 years b.c. We know that, by some untold circumstance, Alex- ander was prevented from invading the Sacae, or at least from prevailing over them, as he did over the Bactrians. The Sacae were then a distinct people, and their knowledge and influence appear to have been employed by Alexander in his incursion into India. It is said that certain Sacae, being famous for the use of the bow, and also as skilful horsemen, were of great M 162 THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. use to liis army. With these remarkable people a new religion appears to have been introduced into India. This religion has been ever since known as Buddhism, said to be first taught, in its present form, by Sakya. Now Buddha is said to have been born b.c. 618.* It is remarkable that this Buddha is called Maga (a Magian) by the Burmahs ;f and, in Burmah, Arracan, Ceylon, and Siam the sacred lan- guage of Buddhism is called the language of the Mags or Magi ; J and, indeed, the priests of the Per- sians, Bactrians, Charasmians, Arians, and Sacas are equally called Magi, and are described as so many tribes descended from the Sacas.§ To connect the Sacas of the East with those of the West, we observe that the White Island England — Sacam or Saxum, as pronounced by our Saxon ancestors — is stated in the Purana named Yaraha to have been in the possession of the Sacs (or Sacae) at an early period. || From the origin of this religion of Buddha com- menced a new era in the East, named the era of the Sacas. Hence we infer that Sakya belonged to this people. They proceeded from the north into Cashmir. We have shown that a people of this name were recognised by ancient geographers and historians as a tribe of Scythians residing to the north of Cashmir, and we have found some reasons to imagine that these Sacas sprung from the house of Isaac; a division of the Israelites who did not return from Assyria to Samaria. We now proceed, if possible, to discover any additional reasons for supposing these people to * Asiatic Researches, vol. ix. p. 90. + As. Res. xi. 76. § As. Res. xi. 80. f Idem, p. 75. || As. Res. xi. 61. THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. 163 be Israelites. The Sacas must have come into India through Cabul ; it is therefore probable that some traces of their name may still be found amongst the Afghans, a people who have retained their pecu- liarities for many ages, and who, from their occupa- tion of mountain fastnesses, and from their hardy, independent, and warlike habits, engendered by their position, have been able to preserve themselves from foreign dominion. These people have many indi- cations of a Hebrew origin, or, at least, the facts advanced bv the Right Hon. Sir G. H. Rose and the Rev. C. Foster, as already stated, together with other facts presented by preceding writers, such as Sir W. Jones, certainly warrant the conclusion that an ex- tensive Israelite influence must have been from a very early period exerted amongst that people ; and it is by no means improbable that the purer tribes amongst them are really descendants of the Israelites, as they believe themselves to be. What we seek, however, is a connexion between the word Sacce , or Sakai, and the Israelites, and that, I think, we dis- cover in certain tribes of the Afghans. The following passage is from a letter* written by an officer on the staff of the commander-in-chief in India. It is dated from Head Quarters, Camp, Munikiala , 20 th January , 1852: — “Having just been through a part of Afghanistan Proper, I cannot help writing to tell you how I was struck with the Jewishness of the people; and not only their appearance, but every possible circumstance tends to convince one that they are the descendants of the Ten Tribes. They call themselves * Quoted by Sir G. H. Rose in his work on the Afghans. 1G4 THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. Bunnie Israeel (Bunnie being exactly synonymous with ‘ Mac ’ in Scotland, and ‘ Fitz ’ in England), and are proud of it ; whereas to all other Mahometans a more severe term of abuse cannot be applied than Yahoodee , or Jew. We may observe that these so- called Benee-Israel despise the Jews almost as much as any Mahometan people can. They pride them- selves on being sons of Israel in contradistinction from the people of Judah; a strong presumptive evi- dence that they are really derived from the Israelites, especially as this distinction has been maintained from time immemorial amongst them. One of the tribes that at present are giving us a good deal of trouble, is called ‘ Yousuf zyes,' or tribe of Joseph, ‘zie’ meaning ‘tribe;’ and next to them are the Jzakzie, or tribe of Isaac.” This is the point to be observed, Joseph and Isaac are not properly names of either of the tribes into which the Israelites were divided by lot in their own land; but the application of those names affords proof that, if the Afghans are descendants of Israelites, they adopted distinctive appellations in those names, and it is therefore clear that the name of Isaac was chosen as one mark of Israelitish descent. This is a point which we needed to establish in order to sustain the opinion that the Sacae, or Sakai, might have derived their name origi- nally from Isaac. If the name be adopted to designate one tribe, it might formerly more suitably have been used to designate all the tribes, for every tribe was equally interested in the name, the descent, and the words of the covenant with Abraham : “ In Isaac shall thy seed he called .” (Gen. xxi. 12.) The fact is THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. 165 evinced in the existence of an extensive tribe actually using that name as professed Israelites from time immemorial, and these are situated where we might naturally have looked for them under the circum- stances supposed. The Hebrews in Mowr, as well as those in Bokhara, assured the Rev. J. Wolff that there are many of the children of Israel of the tribes of Naphtali and Zebulun, in the Hindu Cush, among the Balkhwee, and that they lived by robbery, and knew the exclamation “ Shama Yisrael !” — Hear, 0 Israel.* If the Sacas were of Israelitish origin, we might naturally expect to find some wild remains of them in the country through which we suppose them to have passed ; and that they should retain the Israel- itish passwords was likely in a country which was probably colonized by Jews at a very early period. These facts at least serve to connect the Sacas , or Sakai , whom we find in Cashmir and Orissa, with the Isakzie of Independent Tartary and Bokhara; these countries being, in fact, precisely the seats of the ancient Sacce , or at least of the people so called by the Persians in the time of Herodotus. (Z a'yat and ZaKag.) It would be very strange if, having, from other circumstances, been induced to believe that the Ten Tribes went into those regions, we there found a multitude of people who declared themselves to be the descendants of these tribes, and yet that they should not be so. We have supposed them to have been named Sacae, or Sakai, after Isaac; and here, in the very seat of the Sacae of old, we find large numbers of people professing to be Israelites, calling themselves * Wolffs Mission to Bokhara, vol. ii. p. 165. 166 THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. Isakzie, a name readily converted into Sakai by the Greeks, who habitually rendered the names of the barbarians only into approximate sounds. Is it pos- sible to account for these facts but on the supposition that they are derived from the real Beni-Israel? Why should these people thus name themselves, in spite of the prejudice of all the nations around them against everything Jewish? Had they not been accustomed so to denominate themselves from a period when they had reason, from their influence, to be proud of the name, we can scarcely understand why they should be proud of it now, when anything but high hopes or noble aspirations is associated with it, even by them- selves. Now, if the Sacas, or Sakai, of Independent Tartary and Bokhara, were the predecessors of the so-called Beni-Israel now resident in those countries, and, if they were also called Isakzie after Isaac, then it is fair to infer that the Sakai who came into India through those countries were of the same origin. Amongst the names of the six tribes into which the inhabitants of Media are divided by Herodotus* there ought, as already observed, to be one to repre- sent the Israelites, who certainly occupied the country in large numbers at the period referred to in his history when writing of those inhabitants. This has been a stumblingblock to some inquirers. But should we not expect their Hebrew origin to be dis- guised under some name adopted by themselves as expressive of their condition? Whether so or not, we find, in the enumeration of the tribes of Media as given by Herodotus, the very name by which we * 1 . 101 . THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. 167 believe the Sakai designated themselves when intro- ducing a new religion into India; that name is Buddhii, or Buddhists (E'~P) ; which, in Hebrew, signifies the detached or separated people. There are no direct evidences that the Israelites were ever so called by their own people; but yet there is a passage in itself remarkable, as prophetically applied to the children of Israel under the name of Ephraim, in which passage the word Baddhi refers to them in some especial manner which our translators have failed to understand. This misunderstanding is indi- cated by the fact that the word is translated so differently in those passages where it occurs, and as if to make a sense not to be found by a literal ren- dering, or by retaining the words as terms of deno- mination. The word Baddhai occurs, with the same pointing, both in Isai. xvi. 6, and in Hos. xi. 6; in the former the word is rendered lies, and in the latter branches, but both cannot be correct. It will throw some light on our inquiry to reflect at full on both those passages as denouncing a rebellious people: “We have heard of the pride of Moab: he is very proud; even of his haughtiness, and his pride, and his wrath; but his lies [Baddhai] shall not be so.” (Isai. xvi. 6.) In Hosea xi. 5, 6, it is said of Ephraim : “ He shall not return into the land of Egypt, but the Assyrian shall be his king, because they refused to return. And the sword shall abide on his cities, and shall consume his branches p'7^ — Baddhai], and devour them [the Baddhai], because of their own counsels.” Now, comparing the word Baddhai, or Budii, in these passages, it is clear that 168 THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. the reference is to the separate parties or divisions of the people in connexion with cities; for, even if we take the term in any case to mean branches, yet it can only be branches of the people, for they are represented as taking counsel. If so, then it is easy to see that the term was familiar to the Israelites as signifying certain collections of their own people, and therefore it would probably be similarly employed by them in Assyria and elsewhere; so that, speaking of their different portions as pertaining to the dif- ferent places or cities which, in Media and Assyria, they inhabited, they would call them Baddhii, or the separate parts as branches, and thus, at length, be known as a body of people under this appellation, that is to say, as Buddhists. A people of the same name are also mentioned by Herodotus as amongst the Scythians, and he repre- sents them as a great and populous nation, who had adopted Scythian customs, and amongst whom many Greeks had settled at an early period.* We discover indications of the presence of the Sacoe and the Buddhii, that is, the Saxons and the Buddhists, in northern India, about sixty years after the Scythians had overrun Media and Mesopotamia. Their incur- sion occurred in the reign of Cyaxares, who succeeded Phraortes, the first king of Independent Media, pro- bably about 625 years b.c. The Israelites were probably still dwelling for the most part in Media at this period. The Scythians, who had mastered all Asia,f were expelled about 598 b.c.J Their course * iv. 108. f Herodotus, i. 104. X Volney, Chronologie d’Herodote. THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. 169 is very remarkable; they were driving the Cimme- rians (or Gomeri) before them into Asia, when they encountered the Medes at a place inhabited by the Massa-Getce , or Goths of Masha, on the right of Mount Caucasus, between it and the Caspian Sea. They subdued all before them until they reached Palestine; and, as if their object were there accom- plished, they then proceeded to prey upon Assyria for twenty-eight years. But, like the Ephraimites, they were given to drunkenness, and their chiefs being invited to a feast by Cyaxares and the Medes, they were intoxicated and put to death. After which, the Medes recovered their dominion, and expelled the Scy- thians. The Scythian invasion came in from the north ; the direction whence the prophet Ezekiel, in a vision, saw the advancing cloud, the whirlwind, and the fire in which the Israelitish people seemed symbolically involved. Now, supposing the prophecy fulfilled by this incursion, we should expect to find traces of the Israelites in the north and the east after the expul- sion of the Scythians; since we regard these people as mingling with the Israelites and preparing a way for their departure from Media and Mesopotamia. Esdras says the Ten Tribes took counsel together and went out peaceably, crossing over the narrow passages of the river Euphrates. This would take them in the course indicated, namely, through Armenia, and between Mount Masha and the Caspian Sea; the very course by which the Scythians had come in. Now, we cannot discover any period, in the history of Media and Mesopotamia, in which the great body of the Israelites could have so departed, 170 THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. except that of the time when the Scythians held do- minion over those countries, and were, as we supposed, friendly to the Israelites. It is after this that the Sacaa begin to be confounded with the Scythians. An interval of nearly sixty years passes between the expulsion of the Scythians and the appearance of the Sacae, the Getas, and the Buddhii in India. They flow in through Bokhara and Afghanistan, where we find remnants of people still dwelling, who claim to be called children of Israel. The Sacas and the Buddhii took possession of Cashmir in the year 340 b.c., according to the history of that country.* We now proceed further to show that the Buddhists, the Sacas, and the Geti, or Goths, who spread over India from Cabul and Cashmir, were connected with the house of Isaac, both in name and in language; and the evidence we offer is the record written on the rock with a pen of iron. There was, in the early part of our era, a large Buddha establishment, and the capital of a kingdom, named Sanclii , on the banks of Betwa, and about twenty miles to the north-east of Bhupal. It was the centre of a kingdom called Sanaka-nikci, and be- longed to the Sakya tribes, so famous for the use of the bow, and their entire devotion to Buddha. This kingdom was also called Sachi , which would be the same as Sakai. Here, then, we are at once con- ducted to the Saxon tribes in India; and, looking over the account of the topes of Sachi, which were explored by Major Cunningham, f we find some in- teresting particulars, and are presented with bas-reliefs * As. Res. vol. xv. p. 112. f Now Lieutenant-Colonel. FROM A BAS-RELIEF AT SANCHI. THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. 171 of the people themselves, in their various domestic scenes and religious ceremonies. At the south gate of the great tope of Sachi stands a pillar surmounted with four lions, at the right of the entrance, and on that pillar a bas relief, which is represented in the accompanying engraving, copied from that of Major Cunningham. Each gateway is formed of two square pillars 2 feet 3 inches thick, and 13 feet 8 inches in height. The capitals of the pillars on the western gate are four human dwarfs; those of the southern gate four lions; those of the other gateways four elephants surmounted by their riders. The total height of the gateway is 18 feet 2 inches, and its breadth is 7 feet.* The inscription is conspicuous, and exceedingly well preserved. Major Cunningham says, “ I cannot even make a guess at its meaning.” If, however, it be transliterated into modern Hebrew characters,! its meaning becomes evident; thus — crpmo nan in inoi jn 1 ? qttfn mn roaa That is — O Sale, my glory, tldne image [or assimilation ] shall he for a festival, a mountain of refuge far those who came from afar, from Mahhath. We shall find, from numerous other inscriptions, that the person honoured by such celebrations under the name of Sak is the same as Godama. Sakya seems to be the Sanscrit name of this individual, and his history is ex- tensively known in Buddhistic annals as the founder of Buddhism in itsrecent forms. The Chinese Buddhists^ * From Major Cunningham’s Bhilsa Topes, p. 189. f The reason for doing this will be seen in the next chapters. J Fo-kwe-ki, c. xvii. note 17. 172 THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. say the name Saki signifies “ repose or silence.” As Hebrew it will admit of that meaning, but only in the sense of ceasing to resist, as in X umbers xvii 5: ‘ ‘ I will make to cease from me the murmurings of the children of Israel.” It is especially interesting to discover that the invocation of Sak was known in Britain at a very early period, for this fact connects the first arrival of the Saki, or Saxons, in Britain with Buddhism as known by the Saki of India; thus proving the similarity of their origin. My authority for this statement is found in that singular and very ancient Druidical hymn known as Gwawd Lludd y Mawr, or the Praise of Lludd the Great. It is quoted from Welsh Archaiology (p. 74), by the Rev. E. Davies, in his work on the Mythology of the British Druids (Appendix Xo. 12). Four short lines are given in this poem as the prayer of five hundred men who came in five ships. The words of this prayer were suspected by Mr. Davies to be Hebrew, in con- sequence of Taliesen the bard (GOO a.d.) having declared that his lore had been delivered to him in Hebrew or Hebraic.* Mr. Davies therefore tran- scribed the passage in Hebrew letters thus : — y nnn \nn:n O-Bnthi Britli oi nn U yy 13 Nu oes nu edi n'-Q W"Q Brithi Brith anhai 'yn in nn nn Sych edi edi eu roi. He does not attempt to give the meaning ; but, after familiarly puzzling out ancient Buddhistic inscrip- tions, I venture to give this literal rendering : — * His words are Yu Efrai, yni Efroeg Eilgwcth yin rhitliad. (Taliesen's Angar Cyvyndawd.) THE BUDDHISTS AXD THE SAKAI. 173 And I have made a covenant — a Heap, A home of wood is a home, my guide, I have made a covenant, 0 ship, — Sak is my guide, my guide, he is my Friend. The Being they worshipped is also called Adonai , the Hebrew name of the Lord Almighty. The appeal to the Heap is significant, as will fully appear in another place; hut even the tope or tumulus erected over Sak at Sachi will afford a clue to the secret ; since such mounds were at first only heaps of stones, as wit- nesses of devotion or of vows, or as memorials of the venerated dead, and as signs of the course taken by the Israelites, according to the prophet. (Jer. xxxi. 21.) These uses of the heap are illustrated by many pas- sages in the Hebrew Scripture. See, heap of witness, Gen. xxxi. 52; Deut. xiii. 16; Josh. vii. 26; viii. 28; 2 Sam. xviii. 17. There is an obscure passage in Job xxx. 24, which these observations may illustrate. In this passage the word translated “ grave” in our version is heap in the original : “ Howbeit he will not stretch out his hand to the grave [at the heap], though they cry in his destruction.” In Job xxi. 23 we have “ T et shall he watch in the heap ” (at the heap). The wanderings of the sons of Isaac are to be traced, in fact, by theirgraves being marked by peculiar heaps of ruin, and these are erected in expression of a covenant with destruction. The Jews are described as making a covenant with death in Isaiah xxviii. 18. The only other word to detain us over this inscription is the name of the place from which the worshippers are said to have come, 174 THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. namely, Makheth. This is confirmatory of the re- cord preserved by the Malabar Hebrews, which states that some of the scattered Israelites went to Makhe, in Tartary, Makheth being only the full form of the same w r ord. Moikha is named in the Behistun in- scriptions. AVas it Moecia? The connexion of the Sakai, or Sachi, with Tartary will be shown presently. As to the mountain of refuge, it is to be observed that a mountain amongst the Hebrews was under- stood to be the proper place for a house of worship, as in Isaiah ii. 3 : “ The mountain of the Lord’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains.” The bas-relief over which the above inscription stands represents the adoration of the relics of Sak- ya Sinha, the last of the mortal Buddhas, who at death is supposed to have attained Nirvan , or free- dom from transmigration. This word is peculiar to Buddhism, and is variously explained; but may it not be a Hebrew word signifying the state of being fully satisfied — 1!D“U[?]. Major Cunningham names the scene depicted in the engraving “ The Casket Scene in the Palace.” “ The king, with his family and mi- nisters, seated in the foreground to the left. In the centre a relic-casket, with two attendants holding the chatta [umbrella] and chaori [mace] over it. To the left a seated female is beating a drum, and a female dancer naked to the waist, with the arms extended be- fore her in a peculiar manner still practised in India. I lithe background are two male figures, and one female figure with a round cap, similar to those worn by the Kashmir women of the present day. To the right are numerous figures, all standing; two having their THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. 175 hands joined in adoration appear to be the Raja and his minister” (p. 213). The figure of a head with a peculiar head-dress lying near the relic-basket is overlooked by Major Cunningham. The position of the head gives one the idea that it was intended to represent the dead person to whom the relics belonged. The whole scene may be intended to represent the inauguration of a statue of Sak, for the statue erected at the northern entrance of this tope is no doubt that of the last Buddha. His assimilation to God is ex- pressed by the erection of his likeness to be wor- shipped. This idea would well agree with the fore- going translation of the inscription. The head-dresses of most of the figures remind us of the kerchiefs for the head (Ezek. xiii. 18), which were charms. The traditional head-dress of the Jewish women in the East is called chalebi , and consists of balls of linen rags tightly compressed, over which a shawl is carefully wound, just as we see in the engraving.* The bracelets and anklets of gold are precisely such as were found in the tumuli on the north of the Caucasus described by Dr. Clarke in his Travels, and thence we suppose these people to have come. As all the faces but that of the naked figure are carefully grouped and turned towards the spectator, it would appear that they were intended to be portraits. Our rough sketch in the engraving is but a rude imitation of the original. The figure, naked, as if by way of humiliation, is pro- bably that of the king, whose face it would not be lawful to represent. * See Jews in the East, by Dr. Fraakl. 176 THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. Some of the figures in other bas-reliefs are evi- dently Scythian or Tartar, particularly the dancing women. I regard the whole scene as representing individuals of different nations under the dominion of the Sakas. In respect to the indirect evidence of Israelitish origin presented by the Sakai as chiselled on the pillars of these Sakai topes, or, as the natives in some places call them, Buddha — bitha * in this place I would specify the dress of the soldiersf and the trial of the bow. Major Cunningham was so struck with the peculiar and picturesque manner in which the quiver is fastened to the soldier’s back, that he was at once reminded of the Psalmist’s words con- cerning the children of Ephraim, who, being harnessed and carrying bows , turned back in the day of battle. (Ps. lxxviii. 10.) The whole costume resembles that of the Scotch Highlanders, the hilt being the marked part of their clothing. The ornament on the shields of the cavalry and foot is a double cross, the St. George’s, or sometimes a crescent and two stars. See symbols of Buddhism in Chap. X. The trial of the supposed founder of Buddhism in India, Salcya , is represented as being a triumphant shooting with a bow strung by himself, and which it required a thousand persons to bend. The trial begins with piercing a liorse-hair by shooting at it under the obscurity of dense clouds, which can only signify subtlety in religious discussion; a relic of I which accomplishment we seem to have retained in * Hebrew — house or temple. f As described by Major Cunningham, from the bas-relief of a siege on a pillar at Sanchi. (Bhilsa Topes, p. 215.) THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. 177 our habits of hair-splitting. In the Sakian sense the bow and arrow are persuasive teaching. The form of the bow is precisely that of the Saxons of the West. When Sakya’s trial was accomplished, the Sakya tribes sent their daughters superbly decorated to the young prince, with forty thousand dancing and singing girls. All this must be figurative of the con- quest of Sakya over the opposers of his religion, for it is said that, after having pierced seven iron targets with his arrow, it reached the mountains of the iron girdle and then pierced the earth , and caused a spring of water to gush forth. The complete victory is fol- lowed by beating of drums and instrumental music, when he mounted his horse (his horses are always supposed to be white), and returned to his palace. The trial of skill is with his brothers Devadatta and Nanda; Nanda typifying Brahminism, or the worship of the sacred bull; and Devadatta , Davidism or Judaism: both which, there is reason to believe, opposed the spread of Buddhism in Central India. The drums , music , and mounting the white horse symbolize religious conquest, the religion itself being symbolized by a spring of water supplying wells built for the supply of travellers.* It is quite a matter of dispute when the Saca era began in India; but the probability is that there was more than one such era, the Earliest being that of the rise of Sakya’s religion amongst the Sakya, or Saxon tribes, in the sixth century b.c., and the last when the Scythian Sakas, or Sac®, came again under the * See Fo-kwe-ki, c. xxii. note 7, and Tumour in Prinsep’s Journal, vii. p. 804. N 178 THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. dominion of a king of their own, who governed the whole of Khorasan, Afghanistan, the Punjab, and nearly all India, (b.c. 78.) For the present it is enough to prove the existence of a Saxon kingdom extending its dominion through its religious teachers throughout the East and over half mankind. We have sought a peculiar people of Saxon name, and found them. We supposed these people were known in Assyria and Media as Sakai and Buddhii. We supposed them to have gone into the north and mingled with the Scythian tribes ; and here, in Central India, we find a people precisely of the character we seek, under various designations, but always bearing the same marks, being peculiar alike in religious and secular habits. The Tribes is their earliest name. Ptolemy calls them the Noble Tribes; the Buddhist annals acknowledge them as the Sakya Tribes, their kingdom is Saka-nika , and their religious dominion is felt from Persia to China, and from Ceylon to the centre of Mongolia. They seem to belong to the same race as the various tribes of Afghans, but are separated from them by the religious creed and denomination known as that of the Buddhii and the Pali. As Buddhii we looked for them, because the term in their tongue we believed to indicate their separation ; but the term Pali, as applied to this sepa- rated people, is difficult to explain, until we remember that in Hebrew the term exactly expresses the fact which fixes it upon them; for, as Buddhii means sepa- rated , so Pali means set apart and peculiar: both terms alike indicating how completely these people regarded themselves as the chosen. As Buddhii sig- THE BUDDHISTS AND THE SAKAI. 179 nifies branches or separate divisions of people, the terra might at first have been equivalent to tribes; and possibly the term Pali , or Phali , was not adopted by the Saca? until the Greeks came amongst them ; for the Greeks would call the tribes Phyli ; which word a Hebrew people would adopt in their own sense of it — set apart or distinguished — adding, it may be, some ennobling designation; and hence perhaps the name conferred by Ptolemy on the people who dwelt in or near the region now spoken of — the Noble Tribes — Aristopliyli. Their central land was called Magadha , which, in Hebrew, means noble. Their name as a whole was Sacse, Sakai, Sassani, or Saxons; a name more interesting to us, and the most aristocratic in the world. At a period perhaps 500 years before our era we find these people represented in a bas-relief at the entrance to a Buddha-bitha , a house of the holy one, whose synonyme is Light.* They are here seen in a place named after themselves, and in the act of wor- shipping the relics of a prophet who came to them in their own name; and over their heads is inscribed the record that they owned this man as their moun- tain of refuge after their wanderings from afar, from the place of affliction, that is, from Makhe ( rDD), and gathered together to hold regular festivals in his honour. We will now proceed to consider some of the doctrines of Buddhism. * A large tope at Sachi is dedicated to the Supreme Buddha as Light. 180 CHAPTER IX. THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. It is related in the Buddhistic Scriptures of Tibet that the doctrines of Adi- Buddha, the Supreme God ( Ad\ori]i- Buddha ?), were adopted and taught by Sakya in consequence of instructions he received from the King of Sambhala , a fabulous place on the north of the Jaxartes * This king is said to have visited Sakya at Cuttack, in Orissa. This tradition is pro- bably founded on the fact that Sakya derived his doc- trines from the Bacas ; some tribes of whom, at the first promulgation of Sakya’s Buddhism, certainly dwelt in the neighbourhood of the Jaxartes, for that river arises in the land of those Sacae who arrested the progress of Alexander’s army in that direction. It appears that the future coming of the Lord of the world, who, destroying the serpent, should bring peace, and who should spring from the Sakian race, was the doctrine especially connected with the name of Adi- Buddlia, whom Buddhists now regard as the Intel- lectual Being (or Essence) by whom all things were created. This is but another form of the Hebrew prophecy handed down from the first man, concern- ing the coming of a Divine Man Avho should trample on the serpent’s head and restore man to his lost * See Csoma de Koros’ Tibetan Grammar. THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 181 Paradise. As this prophecy advanced towards fulfil- ment the intimations concerning the Messiah’s cha- racter and advent became more and more distinct, as portrayed in the language of inspiration; but the very calling of Abraham as the father and founder of the families and the hopes of Israel, was immedi- ately connected with the promise of that Son of Man of whom Isaac was the type; and so from the day that Abraham’s faith foresaw the coming of Messiah as the conqueror of Death, the word was spread abroad by his people that the promised Saviour should spring from the seed of Isaac. Here, then, we see the connexion between the predicted Messiah and Sakya’s announcement of the future coming of the Lord of the world, springing from the Sakian race and bearing in his hand the symbol of his creative and protecting power in the restoration of man to Paradise. The unopened lotus, so frequently seen in Buddhistic temples and even in the hand of Godama himself, points to this final Buddha as foretold by Godama the present one. As stated in our Introduction, the lotus was held, even by the Egyptians, as an emblem of the Divine power protecting man. Hence we see that in the celebrated Zodiac on the ceiling of the temple of Tentyris, the Virgin Mother appears sus- tained by a lotus. The Buddhists of China have the same symbol, and the title of the Queen of Heaven is applied almost with as much devotion as if it were adopted from the creed of Rome. The opening flower, together with the fruit of the pomegranate, like the knops and flowers in the tabernacle (Ex. xxxvii. 19, &c.), and in the cedar mouldings of Solo- 182 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. mon’s temple (1 Kings vi. 18), were symbols of the nation in respect to the promises amongst the early Buddhists as amongst the Israelites. The moulding of the fresco representing the Buddhas springing from the lotus in the cave-temple of Ajanta, has precisely this form of “ knops and flowers,” the flowers being lotuses, or lilies,* thus. And, as if to show the all- embracing and purifying brother- hood of the Divine Man, the Ethiopian, or negro, is also here seen standing on the lotus, and covered with an ample white robe, and having a glory round his woolly head ; a lesson which the Western Saxons are but slowly learning.f Buddha himself is also fre- quently represented as a negro. We must not forget the probability that Sakya himself was of the Sacian, or Saxon race, though, per- haps, he had been separated from his people, or per- tained to a tribe that was the first to penetrate into India, and encounter the pride and cruelty of caste with ideas derived from the knowledge of a law that declared all men equal in the sight of their Maker, and required the neighbour to be loved as oneself. The Sacian strangers that poured into Orissa from the north and the west were sojourners with the Ethio- pians of Indu-Cush, but they were no barbarians, for they brought with them a religion vastly superior to that prevailing through India. The doctrines of Sakya were a refinement upon the worship of the elements, Paramath, and the hosts of heaven, to which the Persians and some of the corrupted Israelites are * See Bird’s Historical Researches, plate 20. f Idem, plate 3. THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 183 known to have been addicted; neither did Sakya honour the hereditary priesthood of the Brahmins, who, as we learn from the Yedas, sacrificed animals in a manner not unlike that of the Hebrews. Neither did he sympathize with their opponents, the Sicastikas, who promised man nothing but annihilation at last. But he blended the Brahminical notion of the trans- migration of souls and ultimate immortality with the idea that the spirit’s return to Him who gave it, or union with God, was the highest state of man. Thus he reconciled the creed of the rationalistic fatalists, who said “ so be it,” with a morality that forbade atheistic indifference, while it encouraged the sup- pression of merely selfish desires as alike inconsistent with the good of society and the soul’s final emanci- pation from sin and suffering. I will not repeat what, on doubtful authority and contradictory record, has been stated concerning the faith of Sakya, as I hope to quote his creed from the rock-records of the. period immediately succeeding that of his teaching. It will be interesting to observe the similarity be- tween some of the doctrines of Buddha and those of Anaxagoras and Pythagoras; a similarity that has been skilfully pointed out by Major Cunningham,* and for which the intimacy of the Greeks with the seat of Buddhism at an early period will sufficiently account. The point of especial interest is the fact that Sakya becomes a real anti-Christ, or substitute for Christ, verily representing himself as God, and continuing to sit permanently in God’s temple as the only object of worship. * Bhilsa Topes, p. 33. 184 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. Of course, amidst so many elements of religious discord as must have existed amongst converts from all varieties of creed in India, dissension rapidly sprung up after the decease of the authoritative teacher whose inspiration was devoutly believed by all his disciples. The man who, during forty years’ preaching, had overturned many tyrannies — inculcated charity and chastity where both had been unknown — declared perfect equality between high caste and low, and founded hospitals for the halt, the blind, and the destitute, placing a trained physician at stated inter- vals, for the help of the afflicted, along the highways — who had sent out his missionaries, fired with his own zeal and enlightened by his intelligence, to teach kindness everywhere, and the performance of a thoughtful devotion as the means of delivering the soul from evil — the man that had raised woman to her right place, at the side and in the heart of man — the man that had not only erected a new system of reli- gion upon thought concerning the perishable and the everlasting, but also thus promoted and enforced the highest moral reform known in the world before Christianity appeared — the man that had remodelled the language as well as the ideas of the people over whom he reigned by directing the compilation of new Sanskrit and Pali grammars* — the man qualified to accomplish such things was a man likely to be missed ; and not one amongst his chief disciples was likely to be better fitted to fill his throne than were any of the Seleucidas to succeed Alexander the Great. His doctrines were not, like Mahomet’s, to be carried * Probably with a view to the incorporation of Hebrew in a Pali form. THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 185 out by presenting the sword in one band and a Koran in the other; but by inviting both man and woman equally to consider the best use and highest end of this life. His successors needed mind, and they had it; but they also needed unity, and had it not. The rule of many minds, instead of that of the one master mind, soon followed; and by and bye synods were invented as a substitute for the centralization of a will and a purpose; but this invention was but a feeble substitute. Three extraordinary assemblies of this kind were summoned under the auspices of the learned fraternities that continued heartily to propa- gate the doctrines of Godama. We will not go into the consideration of all their discussions about what was allowable, or what not, but at once run on to the year 270 b.c., when Asoka , formerly surnamed the Furious , but, since conversion to Buddhism, known as the Pious , began to perceive the necessity of clearing his country of heretical sects. Alas, eight sects were found amongst the monkish priests alone, and sixty thousand of them were stripped of their gowns. Here, by way of note, it is worthy of remark that this Asoka, King of Magadha, is said, in the annals of Cashmir (of very early date), to have been converted to the religion of the Sakai, or Saks; so that it was then understood that the Sacas, who over- ran the land, were all Buddhists. Asoka was assisted by a thousand Arhats, or religious counsellors, who assembled with him at Pataliputra; and who, when they had disposed of the heretics, sat for nine months rehearsing the doctrines and praises of Sakya-Godama ; and then, at the conclusion of the synod, sent out 186 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA BUDDHA. a number of authentic teachers to the following countries: — 1. Cashmir and Peshdwar. 2. The country about the Narbada. 3. Mewar and Bundi. 4. Northern Sind.* 5. The Maharatta country. 6. The Greek province of Cabul, Arachosia. 7. The country of the Himalayas. 8. Ava, or Siam — that is, the golden land, Aurea Regio , or the Aurea Cher- sonesus. 9. Lanka , or Ceylon. The narrative of these missions is preserved entire in the Singalese sacred books Dipawanso and Mahawanso. I have referred to these missions to show that Cabul Proper, and that part of the Punjab which we have supposed the Sacee to have occupied, had no occasion for missionaries, being, as we may infer, already Buddhists, and that because they were Sacae. As we may have reason to recur to Asoka, some of the incidents of his zeal may not be uninteresting in this place, as elucidating the doctrines of Sakya and their origin. When first Sakya introduced his novelties of doctrine and modes of worship he was stoutly resisted by the adherents to the old form of things, and especially by the priests. But such a man was not to be put down; he knew his mission. What was it to him that the Dewadatha and his kindred disapproved? In courtesy he acknowledged their good intentions, but begged to convince them that the claims of Heaven were superior to theirs. Had he not seen angels,- and talked with the dead, who bade him remodel the world’s ideas like a re- former self-reformed? Had it not been written on the tables of his heart that the scholar must sacrifice * The missionary here was a Greek. THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-fiUDDHA. 187 himself and expiate his errors with his bodily life? He was ready to suffer anything in defence of the faith he was called to preach, and so he defied all opposers, and so he conquered them. Nevertheless, there was division ; and Sakya, though he defied the sorceries of the Turs and the fire-worshippers, could not suppress the schisms amongst those who pro- fessed to be his followers.* It is true he as- sumed authority in consequence of direct inspi- ration; for, as he told his disciples, a thousand lights had been kindled by his angel upon his body to purify him from his former sins, and the doctrines of truth had been written on his own body with a pen formed out of his own bones, and dipped in his own blood instead of ink. They accepted all this, and many volumes of experiences besides; but still they held tlteir own opinion about forms and cere- monies, if not about faith and acceptance. It is evident that they appealed to pre-existing usages and written authorities preceding the new assumption, and endeavoured to reconcile their belief in Sakya’s calling with the truth of former prophets. During Sakya’s life his authority checked divisions ; but after his death disputes speedily spread discord in Magadha, where the new Buddhism was first set up. The earlier divisions were settled by synods, and within a century after Sakya’s death two remarkable synods were held, in both of which the written laws in relation to religious usages and assemblies were appealed to, and the schismatics judged accordingly. The English reader * The Turs, or Turi, were a sort of wandering friars, so called evidently from '“llTI, signifying those who go about to spy out a country. 188 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. would be struck with the resemblance which the synod bears to that of a trial by jury, in which we have the hearing of both parties in reply to questions, the retirement of the jury to consider their verdict, and the sentence of the judge according to law ;* a mode of proceeding vastly ditferent from the usual judicature of the East. On a future occasion, when the dissentients became too numerous to be dealt with by synod, a readier mode was adopted. Such was the state of things in the commencement of the reign of Asoka. (274 b.c.) He was surnamed the Furious ; and when he was converted to Buddhism, he carried his fury into his religion, and in four years compelled “the whole of Northern India, from the mountains of Kashmir to the banks of the Narbadda, and from the mouths of the Indus to the Bay of Bengal,” to receive his own views. The schism then seems to have been settled by the pre- dominant party appealing to the king, who, of course, employed his only authority, that of the sword, and, as usual, effectually proved where the heresy lay, by threatening, like other defenders of the faith, death to all who did not believe as he did. The orthodox receivers of the new religion were so strict in their ideas that they contended that acceptable worship could only be offered up by ordained men, or ap- pointed priests, and that only in places especiall}' consecrated for the purpose. The higher order of priests in the kingdom of Asoka were also so strict that they deemed it a sin of the first magnitude to worship in the company of any that did not submit * See Major Cunningham’s account, Bhilsa Topes, p. 77. THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDIIA. 189 in all things to their orders. Hence it happened that, since they could not obtain consecrated places, nor contrive to exclude from their assemblies all doubtful characters, they had resolved to confine all the benefits of worship to themselves and the few introduced to their private assemblies by the ob- servance of especial and purifying rites. In this exclusiveness they persisted for seven years, when the king Asoka , being scandalized that public wor- ship should have been suppressed for so long a period by these sanctimonious priests, resolved to put an end to their exclusiveness, and sent his chief minister to persuade them to submission as best he might. This led to a fine scene. The heads of the establish- ment, or monastery, a school of the prophets, in which these rigid priests were congregated, refused to sub- mit to the dictation of the king. They would not come forth from their convent to conduct public worship in places where heretics of all kinds were admitted. Thereupon the king’s minister ordered several of them to be beheaded on the spot, in the order in which they sat at worship. The king’s brother was among the recusants, and he placed him- self on the seat to which the executioner first came, and held out his head for decapitation. This was a martyrdom not expected and not to be desired. The king was referred to ; but, instead of following out his own orders, he saw that he had proceeded already too far; he therefore humbled himself, and begged ab- solution from the holy brotherhood. Thereupon a convocation was commanded, and the Buddhist church was forthwith purified by the expulsion of 190 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 60,000 heretical priests ! So says the record ! Now, what was their heresy? It appears that there were adherents to the old written laws amongst them. These appear to have been mixed with fire-wor- shippers; in short, the circumstances altogether seem to indicate that they were Hebrews somewhat cor- rupted by association with the Magi of Persia, and willing to connive at certain accommodations to the heathenish taste of those about them for the sake of maintaining their influence. They were, however, unwilling or unable to observe the severe discipline which Sakya-Sinha, or -Godama, had imposed on them, or perhaps they conscientiously adhered to older ideas. But the main dispute was concerning the propriety of continuing to sacrifice animals. The Buddhic religion, as propounded by Sakya, forbade the shedding of blood; but the religion of Sakya’s kinsmen, and, therefore, probably the religion which Sakya himself professed before he became inspired with his new ideas, required that clean animals should be offered up as an atonement for sin. These Turs also admitted outer-court worshippers. Another point of contention was concerning vestments, as we learn, from the annals of Buddhism, that the priests that were expelled were clothed in white garments, which were prescribed for sacrificing priests under the Mosaic law. Whether these vest- ments were adopted by themselves or forced upon them amounts to the same thing, they were insisted on as the proper habiliments of those who sacrificed animal life. The new doctrines of Buddha were evidently de- THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 191 livered as a refinement of the old system, whatever that was. Sakya had declared that God did not demand atonement by the shedding of blood as the sign of yielding up of life to his service, but he demanded self-dedication. Thus men addict them- selves to conceits until no longer perceiving any truth in the words of Heaven. The laws of their own folly thus supersede the laws of eternal wisdom, and, in- stead of a gospel, or God’s news, concerning a salva- tion perfected, they produce a prescription of rugged incongruities by following which some sort of Heaven may perchance be gained, if, indeed, it be worth the trouble. Thus it was with the inventor of Buddhism. He substituted his own ten laws for the ten laws of Moses. He takes hold of all the first elements of morality indeed, and therefore his commandments are so far good ; that is, they are so far like God’s laws. He says: — 1. Do not kill. 2. Do not steal. 3. Do not commit impurity. 4. Do not bear false witness. 5. Do not lie. 6. Do not swear. 7. Shun scandal. 8. Do not covet. 9. Seek not revenge. 10. Be not bigoted. These laws are the foundation of the reli- gion taught by the inventor of Buddhism,* and many nominal Christians would be the better for observing them. They commend themselves to the conscience, but all reference to the love of God as the Creator is avoided. Sakya, indeed, was not an idolater; he worshipped one supreme God, and exhorted others to do the same ; but his system necessarily led to idolatry in consequence of the manner in which the attributes of Divinity were figuratively associated by him with * Klaproth’s Leben des Buddha. 192 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. their manifestations in created things. The Divine authority is overlooked, or only implied, and his own authority, on the ground of a new revelation, is substi- tuted and enforced. The devotion of the life to God, as the Author of life, in gratitude, and the thorough yielding of the mind, heart, and soul in love to Him because of his infinite goodness, is not in his practice overlooked; but then the whole economy of salvation from sin is founded on mercy alone, and yet, with an inconsistency by no means uncommon, that mercy is said to be secured by horrible penances and by re- fusing to enjoy the riches of God’s providence. In the Pali work, styled Oossathaka Lankara, or Orna- ment of the Devout, Gaudama, or Gotama, also called Sakya, is represented as undergoing, for forty-nine days, the impregnation that rendered him a Boodh, each change, or advancement towards perfection, oc- cupying seven ;* that is to say, he was engaged in his spiritual struggle for regeneration during a week of weeks — a very Hebraic mode of expressing the com- pleteness of his endeavour after holiness. The cor- ruption of human nature is implied in the fact that Sakya, though tracing his origin to the kingdom of God, owns that he derived a sinful disposition through his birth from an earthly mother. After a long series of trials, and after having sought diligently the means of living in obedience to the laws of God, and in har- mony with nature and mankind, he is enabled to apprehend and appreciate the ten first laws of mo- rality. He then perceives that the death due to sinners is vaster than all the planetary worlds, and * See Bengal As. Journal, vol. xiii. p. 573. THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 193 that sin is not to be atoned for by any abundance of bloodshedding, even though it should fill the channels of all the rivers and all the seas. Enlightened, as he says, by the teaching Spirit, he informs us that he at length obtained a knowledge of his wickedness, and abhorred himself.* But, unhappily, together with this awful Job-like apprehension of the heinousness of sin, he does not, like Job, obtain a just conception of the Divine character. He repents, indeed, in dust and ashes ; but he seems never to get out of the dust and ashes until his metamorphosis in death, the death he sought being the annihilation of desires. He entreats the instructing Spirit to submit him to every proof by which the sincerity of his repentance may be tested, he pleads his having forsaken his king- dom and his throne in evidence of the strength of his convictions; but, in order to avert the consequences of his former sins, under a consciousness of which he was labouring in despair, he begs to be tortured suffi- ciently. Thus, on his entreaty, his teacher laid him down and covered his body with lighted tapers. This, however, he found was not sufficient for his purification, and all he learnt from the process was, he tells us, summed up in these four sentences : — “ All treasures must be emptied. All loftiness must fall. All earthly union must be broken. All that lives must die.” We cannot but perceive a profound idea in these sentences. They seem to teach the insufficiency of all sacrifice to make atonement for sin; and that, * “ Ulligerim Dalai,” quoted by Klaproth in Asia Polyglotta. 0 194 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. in order to be restored to purity and heaven, it is first of all essential that a man should be emptied of all self-reliance, all pride, all earthly attachment, all love of this life merely for its own sake. It appears that this degree of knowledge only augmented his avidity for holy doctrine, so that, day and night, he could not rest. He was saved from despair only by understanding the necessity of renouncing all he valued in this life for the sake of a higher life; but still he thought to expiate his offences by suffering, and therefore, in vision, he thought himself pierced as by a thousand nails, under the hand of his angel guide. The result of this process was a new amount of conviction, expressed in these words : — “ The visible must perish, And all things born must mourn. Faith has a kingdom yet unseen; The real is in the mind.” Still, not satisfied, he entreats for further light, and, in order to this, it appears necessary that he should be subjected to deeper suffering still, and then, with the poetry of a true seer, he seems to enter into a heated furnace, the flames of which reach up to heaven, but in which the angelic instructor still attends to teach him wisdom, while, to soothe his suffering, the refreshing dew of flowers is shed over him from the hands of a thousand angels. Hence he learns these sentences : — “ The strength of mercy is firmer than a rock. Faith in unbounded mercy is the rule, The path to holiness, the way to heaven.” There is something beautiful in this, and, as a Chris- THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 195 tian sees, it is true. Truth and beauty are really one, and hence “ a thing of beauty is a joy for ever.” So Sakya says he was perfectly possessed by this idea of infinite mercy, and that it filled him with unutter- able joy. He went forth inspired by this thought, and it is no wonder his eloquence prevailed with kings and heroes and all that suffered with a strong O O will. His lips were touched with holy fire, and at his words Magi and Brahmins, and Shiva and the Sun- gods began to disappear. He preached repentance, pardon, self-negation, and regeneration ; in dark say- ings truly, but with faith in the Spirit of Mercy ; and hence, his doctrines meeting in some measure the wants of man’s soul, his disciples grew by millions. Now, where can we discover any source from whence such a conception of mercy as the essential perfection of Divinity could be derived but in the Hebrew Bible? It was in reflection on the three epochs of religion which had preceded him, and after he had meditated on the ten commandments first given unto men, and on the ways of God to man, that Sakya obtained his doctrines. This is stated as his own account of the matter. But when we add that Sakya’s baptism of suffering was represented by himself very nearly in the words of Isaiah, as the means by which he was qualified to bear the sins and carry the sorrows of others, so as to heal them by his stripes while he bore the government on his shoulders, the source of his ideas can scarcely be doubted. The ancient Buddhistic creed is probably concealed in a great degree by the comments and expositions of compara- o 2 196 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. tively modern Buddhistic writers ; but, if we carefully examine the Buddhist coins and medals that have been preserved, we shall, with the help of the learned explanations afforded us by Palic scholars, discover much of its mystery. Thus, with a drawing of a Buddhist medal now before us (see plate), we may learn several particulars of great interest. Fig. 1, a, represents a tsedya, or small pagoda (rr\n:i [?]), in which are supposed to be deposited some sacred relic, with the volumes of the sacred law called “ Tara.” This object is usually seen in Bud- dhist coins. The rolls of the law were deposited, with sacred relics also, in the ark of the Israelites. It appears the more remarkable from the fact that the sacred law is named “ Tara,” and that this law is represented by ten upright glyphs, rolls, or pillars. The law contained in the two tables of Moses has also this name, in Hebrew, Torah ; and it also consists of ten divisions, which some of the Rabbi regard as consisting of three orders of commandments, divided, as in this case, three, three, and four. On either side of the recess, or ark, in which the law is deposited, the head of a cobra capella erects itself. Here we recognise the serpent as represented on Egyptian monuments in connexion with the tree of life. We know that all Semitic nations at least associate the serpent with the introduction of sin. Would not this signify that the temptation ever stands beside the law, and that the law is given, as St. Paul says, because of transgression, but that the fulfilment of it is life. Above the law the sun and moon are seen, representing the heavenly souroes ir 3 '/ or 3t J by H H. the Prince of Mekkara D* sc r tied and explained by Cap / " Latter Journal o/ Astatic Society vol xm. S70 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 197 of light and intelligence ruling the day and the night. On the left side of the law we have the triglyph, the usual emblem of the Buddhist Triad, representing the embodiment of the Divine nature in the Buddha; that is to say, the manifestation of God in Buddha, in the law, and in the congregation ; or, as we say, the manifestation of God in Messiah, in the law, and in the Church. When these are joined together to represent the essential attributes, in Trinity, called Tharana Goon, the triglyph is united into the form of a trident, the summit being crowned with the ancient symbol of Deity, consisting of three yods , and being the letter I, J, or Y of the ancient Palic alphabet. This, as before stated, was the emblem of the Supreme amongst the ancient Hebrews, and is equivalent to the same symbol in Hieratic Egyptian and Coptic, implying potentiality. In Arabic, the word Allah , God, is also expressed by three upright strokes united at the base. At the lower part the united triglyph rests upon a cross, or swastika. The cross is a favourite device with the Buddhas, and. when stand- ing alone, it resembles that of the Manicheans, and is placed on a kind of Calvary, as among the Roman Catholics. It signifies the tree of life and knowledge, putting forth leaves, flowers, and fruits, and, being placed in the terrestrial Paradise, it is there productive of all that is good and desirable.* Thus, the essential attributes of the Trinity are represented in the form of a trident, having the emblem of Deity on its summit and the cross at its base; the Divine Manhood, the law, and the Church, being united into one between * See As. Res. vol. x- p. 123. 198 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. the cross as the tree of life, and the Godhead above all, and through all. The other parts of this emble- matic medal are equally expressive. Thus we have on the obverse (Fig. 2) the architectural symbols re- presenting the handiwork of the Great Architect or Geometrician of the universe. The two symbols united represent the letters P and M, meaning their law. They are surrounded by the twenty-eight cha- racteristics of the Maha-gabba — the grand period (Heb.), of which this present world (dispensation[?J) is the last number ; but the whole period is itself repre- sented by the five Boodhs, or embodiments of Deity, placed above these emblems of creative power. The circumstances altogether clearly indicate the Israel- itisli origin of this earliest form of Buddhism. The three epochs of religion are indicated in the Hebrew Bible — the early patriarchal, the Abrahamic, the Mosaic; and mercy was the essential quality of each advance in revelation, from the first promise to the penitents in Eden, until Moses summed up the law as love to God and our neighbour — to God as Himself the perfect One, and to man, as God’s image; the coming of the Saviour-God, born of woman, being associated with all the epochs, as it was also with those of Sakya. It should be remembered that Buddhism as it now exists in India, Ceylon, and the Indo-Chinese terri- tories, does not fairly represent that form of it which originated with Sakya. It has been corrujited by various pagan additions, and has assumed shapes ac- cording to the idolatries it has encountered, until at length but little of the original creed appears in its THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 199 pure form. For instance, the celibacy of the priests of Buddha is now universal, and yet, according to their own records, it appears that Sakya himself was married twice, and that he gave his disciples precepts concerning the qualities which should determine their choice of a wife.* Most of the countries professing Buddhism have corrupted the doctrines of Godama- Buddha; but still the complete equality of men and women has been produced by Buddhism in Burmah and Siam; and Father Bigaudetf says that “ women are in those countries really the companions, and not the slaves of the men ; a high proof of its civilizing tendency, notwithstanding its absurdities.” Though Burmah has been forced into war with us, yet the priests protested against the war, as contrary to the doctrines of Godama. The pure Buddhists repudiate war and all bloodshed — their doctrine is non-resist- ance and submission; they also declare against the folly and pride of caste, and while preaching the ne- cessity of yielding to law, assert the equality of all mankind as subject alike to sin and ruin, and alike to be elevated only by truth and benevolence. It is curious that this new religion introduced from the north-west into the furthest borders of India should have led even the priests of the ghastly Jagan- nath to put something like a spiritual construction upon their hideous worship. They say, “ Hear, now, the truth of the Darn Avatar. [An Avatar is a new manifestation of the Deity.] What part of the uni- verse does not the Divine Spirit pervade? He sports * Vide Lalita Yistara, chap. xii. f Quoted by Sir J. Bowring. 200 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA -BUDDHA. in different forms. In the heaven of Brahma he is Brahma ; in the upper world he is Indra ; on earth he is found in all the Khetris, here in one shape, there in another.” The Brahmins say the Sri Yeo, the Holy Spirit, is worshipped by them at Arka, in Kanarah.* They are very accommodating, and, like pantheists everywhere, philosophically contrive to countenance all forms of idolatry, by allowing every one to dress up any deformity of his own mind and worship it at his liking, provided he declares himself moved by a Sri Yeo. This reference to a Darn Avatar reminds us of the decree addressed by Nebuchadnezzar the king unto all people, and nations, and languages (Dan. iv.), and which for a time probably modified and restrained idolatrous ideas in all the East, as far as the Indus at least, and thus far fulfilled the pur- pose for which that strange king was raised up by Providence, namely, to tell all men that there is a “ Most High, a King of heaven, all whose works are truth, and his ways judgment.” (Dan. iv. 37.) It may not be uninteresting, nor without advantage to our argument, here to introduce a brief notice of the oldest mythological compositions extant in India — those marvellous poems, the Purands, the Mahaba- rata and the Ramayana. From these works we obtain the earliest notice to be found of the ancient history of India, especially in relation to the I struggles of religious systems. The writers affect to relate circumstances as occurring at immensely ancient periods; but it is evident that this air of extreme antiquity is only assumed for the sake of i * Asiat. Res. vol. xv. p. 318, &c. THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 201 adding a venerable mystery to the stirring incidents and grandeur of the scenes depicted. The style of composition proves these works to be of comparatively modern production, and can scarcely be referred to any period much anterior to the Christian era. The Ramayana , as shadowing forth the remotest known conditions of the two typical stocks and national religions of India, is most to our present purpose. It is written after the Homeric manner, and betrays many indications that mingled Greek and Hebrew ideas pervaded the minds of the writers. The subject is the hero divinity of the first dynasty of the kings of Oude , which arose before any other of the sovereignties of India were conquered by the bearded race. The countries and races with whom this hero carried on a successful warfare are per- sonified as giants. Rama is the name of this hero. The point most worthy of remark is, that he is stated to be the son of Buddha and the grandson of Meru. Now, as the whole story personifies nations or people as individuals, we must understand Rama to mean a people — that is to say, an exalted nation. What, then, is signified by this nation being the offspring of Buddha and Meru? Buddha means separated, and Meru his rebellion, that is to say, that the nation mentioned became exalted in consequence of a sepa- ration that arose from rebellion. The original abode of this Rama agrees well with this derivation, for it is stated that he dwelt at first in the holy mountains of the West. Another hero, or nation, is associated with Rama , denominated Bali-Rama (high lord), who is represented as the offspring of Des-Aratlia (the 202 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. country of Armenia). This hero crosses the Indus and Punjab with a large army, distinguished by the names of wild beasts, probably their ensigns ; and he founds a kingdom in Ayodh'ya , now known as Oude. Ay’odh’ya, as Hebrew, would mean “ the praising of God.” It would be highly interesting if it could be shown that the people of Oude, with whom we have had so deadly a quarrel, are of Jewish origin, inheriting the treachery of Judah. This hero, Bali- Rama, with his brother, Krisma, an Indian ally, vanquishes Jar a Saudha , King of Bahar, and afterwards goes forth to conquer other countries, and wars with giants in Ceylon. This war of races and religions is termi- nated by the return of the conqueror to Ayodhya, where he reigns in piety and peace. This country was at one time the centre of Buddhism. In the Mahabaraia we find mythological circum- stances parallel with those of Egypt, Greece, and Rome, and the warfare is between the tribes who ad- here to the Arkite lunar doctrine, and those who wor- ship the sun. By the former, the moon is adored as a representative of the ark, in which the parents of a new world were preserved from the deluge. In some of the mythical tales we find conflicts deli- neated with the extravagance of Eastern romance, in which the tribes of Yadliu (it his hand [ ?]) are broken and scattered. They are described as departing with Ardjoon ( ypTIN fugitives — 1 Chron. viii. 3 ) to unknown regions. In other descriptions the Ashurs (people from Assyria [ ?] ) are spoken of as an eminently religious and virtuous people until, being induced to adopt the new tenets of Buddha, as more humane, THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 203 and forsaking those of their old books, they are said to fall away from the true religion. These Ashurs may be the same as the Ilasaures , or Asii, of Indo-German history ; and if so, they are pro- bably identical with the Sacce. However that may be, the period of their first appearance in India is tolerably well marked, since they are said to have adopted Buddhism in its earliest establishment. It is worthy of remark that these Ashurs are described as the sons or people of Kasyapa , a name similar to that of the country to which Ezra sent for ministers for the house of God, on the return of the Jews to Judea (Ezra viii. 17). Kasyapa is identified with Cashmir by Orientalists. May not this name be traced back to the Caucasus? Diodorus Siculus informs us that the Scythians transplanted a Median colony into Sarmatia ; this was in the seventh century b.c., ac- cording to Klaproth. In the year 948 a.d. remains of these Median colonists of Sarmatia lived on the nor- thern side of the Caucasus and north of Kasachia . These people called themselves As and Ashurs. They are also associated with Ivasog, Kasacks, or Cossacks (all Sacse), in the Russian chronicles. The descend- ants of those colonists now existing in the Caucasus speak an Arian dialect, though surrounded by people of a far different lanmiao-e.* Were not these Medians O O Asheri, or people of the tribe of Asher, who accom- panied the Scythians into the country of the Massa- getas, when they were expelled from Media ? In addition to these observations on the doctrines of Buddhism, we remark that indications of Hebrew * See Muller on the Languages, &c., p. 35. 204 THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. influence on India appear in the following circum- stances: 1. The laws of Menu strikingly resemble those of Moses. 2. When the people of Ceylon were subdued by Buddhist invaders, they were forced, like the Israelites, to make bricks for their masters. 3. When the Great Dagoba, the Ruanwelle, at Anaraja- poora , was built (b.c. 161), the materials were pre- pared at a distance, as in the building of Solomon’s temple. ( Mahawanso , xxvii.) 4. The parting of the Bed Sea has its counterpart in the exploit of the king Gaja Bahu (a.d. 109); who, in bringing back the Singalese from captivity in Sollee , smote the waters of the sea, so that he and his army marched through without wetting the soles of their feet. ( Rajaratna - cari, p. 50.) 5. King Maba Sen (a.d. 275) received his mantle from Heaven, and Buddha, in designating his successor, is said to have transmitted his robe, as Elijah did to Elisha. ( Rajavali , p. 238.) 6. When the Singalese king was dying, a car, descending from the sky, received his spirit; reminding us of Elijah’s translation. 7. Constant allusion is made to the practice of kings washing the feet of priests and anointing them with oil. ( Mahawanso , chap, xxv.- xxx.) 8. In consonance with the Hebrew doctrine, the sins of the fathers are said to have been visited on their children. ( Rajavali , pp. 174-178). 9. The story of Bel and the Dragon has a close resemblance to that of King Batiya Tissa, who by a secret passage entered the Ruanwelle Dagoba. 10. The inextin- O guishable fire on the altar of God (Lev. vi. 13) is like the perpetually-burning lamp in honour of Buddha. 11. The preparation of the high road for THE DOCTRINES OF SAKYA-BUDDHA. 205 the procession of the Bo-tree, and the march of the king, reminds us of Isai. xl. 3. 12. The prophecy of the kingdom of peace by Isaiah, in which the dif- ferent animals (peoples) repose together, resembles the state of things predicted to arise under the religion of Buddha. ( Mahawanso , v. 22.) 13. The judgment of Solomon has its parallel in a story in the Pansyiapanas-jataJca* # See Tennent’s Ceylon, vol. i. p. 525 ; and Roberts’s Illustrations. 206 CHAPTER X. BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: THEIE ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. A few observations on certain points in the rise of the Sacian Buddhism, and on the nature of the sym- bols most reverenced by the learned devotees of that religion, will prepare us the better to interpret the ancient Buddhistic inscriptions, and to demonstrate their origin. It is possible that, although Sakya, the supposed founder of modern Buddhism, be a real personage, yet the incidents of his early life might afford ground for a mythical story, expressive of circumstances in relation to the people whom he represented ; at least, much that is written concerning him may be made to resolve itself into a history of the rise and progress of the Buddhistic religion, or of the people who pro- fessed it. The name Sakya, or Sachia, is Hebrew ITDty, and it appears amongst the Benjamite “ heads of the fathers ” in J Chron. viii. 10. Our lexicons give it as if derived from a word that signifies “ to wander;” but it may mean repose in the sense of ces- sation, rest as arrest, and so may approximate closely to the sense attributed by the Chinese traveller al- ready mentioned to the name of the city or kingdom BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS. 207 Sachi. Sakya is said to be the son of Maya , by Suddhodana , Raja of Kapila. Maya signifies delu- sion in Sanscrit, but in Hebrew it means anything as a judgment from God; but let us transliterate the words thus, njTHty ira — we get the sentence, “ there were destruction and judgment from God : He divided the government in two.” Sakya’s original name is said to have been Siddharta , which is a Chaldee word signifying an effort made for oneself, or inde- pendence. He is said to have descended on his father’s side from Ikshwaku , of the Suryavansa race, NlMinHlty-’DiTUPp' — “ they were ensnared and smitten : God became an enemy, and carried [them] away.” At the age of sixteen Sakya is said to have been united to Yasodard, also called Subhaddachhana rm_(y)W' run "p miltf ; that is, “ her race was saved ; the afflicted, repenting, found mercy.” These words, no doubt, ap- proximate in sound to Sanscrit, and may in that lan- guage, or in Pali, have a meaning, on principles to be shown in another chapter; but this hidden Hebrew sense appears also to belong to them; and it is so remarkably applicable to the people indoctrinated by Sakya, the last mortal Buddha, that, to suppose it quite accidental, is to imagine it possible to form ex- pressive sentences by a chance disposal of letters. The origin of Sakya is almost expressed in the legends concerning his contests with the evil beings called Ashurs (Assyrians), whom he conquered by the use of the bow when known under the name of Sakko. This name, it will be remembered, is that by which we concluded that the Sacae were known on the banks of the Chebar, in Assyria. It is curious 208 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: that the legend should add that Sakya had previously driven out the Ashurs from the land of the Devadas, the name by which I believe the Sacae designated Palestine — the land of those who obeyed the successors of David, and whose religion I suppose to have been personified by the Sacaj under the name Dewadatta , or Davidism. The name of this great teacher is that of one of “ the heads of the fathers ” amongst the Israelites — with whom, certainly, Divine judgment, destruction, and a divided rule were no unknown things ; and it is equally evident that the calamity of Israel arose from an attempt at independency, and that they were entrapped and smitten and forsaken of God, and carried away, are historical facts. After the alliance with another people, success and prosperity follow; and this prosperity we find attributed to the use of the bow after the manner of the Sakai and the Ephraimites. At twenty-nine years of age, after an abundant experience of the joys and sorrows of life, Sakya takes his standing as a teacher. He is re- presented as being converted thus : he is proceeding, as usual, to his pleasure-garden, drawn by his four white steeds, when, encountering a decrepit old man, he at once reflects upon decay. Four months later he meets, under like circum- stances, a squalid wretch afflicted with disease , and reflects on that. Four months later he meets a corpse. He then reflects on death. Four months later he noticed a healthy, well- clad person, wearing the robe of one devoted to religion, and the prince resolves at once to secure health of body and cheerfulness of mind by religion. THEIR ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. 209 Such are “the four predictive signs,” or marks, which all who would be perfect in the worship of Bud- dha must observe. In short, the prevalence of decay , disease , and death renders it essential that a people should secure in religious faith and practice the expectation of st deliverance from suffering, and of an entrance into the joys of a higher life, when death liberates the soul from the thraldom of the body; and this is pre- cisely what Sakya taught when preaching the efficacy of Damma as both faith and works, in charity, abstinence, and reverence for life.* If it be ob- jected that those words which I have pointed out as possibly of Hebrew origin have also a Pali or Sanscrit signification, I reply that, though in general the words peculiarly related to Buddhism and its founder have some sacred and secondary meaning attached to them as Pali words, yet that meaning is always conventional; and that in many instances the meaning of such words is wholly inexplicable and unknown to the most learned amongst the Buddhists of the present day ; and that many of those words are explained on insufficient grounds from comparison with Sanscrit words having only some approximate similarity to them. Thus Sakya, in pursuing his alms-pilgrimage, acquired from certain priests a knowledge of Samapatti. Now, this word is supposed to be the same as the Sanscrit Samadhi , meaning silent abstraction. So, again, Padhan is supposed to mean the same as Pradhan , nature or concrete matter. But, if we remember that Samapatti was a * See Tumour’s Mahcncanso, and extracts from the Attakatthaf P 210 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: mode of religious mortification by which he hoped in vain to perfect himself, we may see the appropriate- ness and force of the word as Hebrew — \D3 naw desolation is my foolishness or deception. He for- sakes this starving, self-afflicting mode for the study of Malia padhan (H3 nno, waiting for redemp- tion), and ultimately he finds the way to perfection in using proper food and proper exercise, while ob- serving all that was essential to the propagation of charity and religion. While under the Bodlii tree it is said that he was assailed by the terrors or demon of death, but he acquired calmness in Damma and in hope of Nirvana .* Now, the words supposed to mean the Demon of Death are Namuchi- Mara , which being Hebrew mis rrbJ, mean rather the removal or wiping away of bitterness. Of Damma much will be said hereafter; but Nirvana is clearly the Hebrew word mrmj, signifying to be fully satisfied or prosperous. Bodhi means, in Hebrew, solitary ; and in this state of solitary medita- tion, under different trees, during a week of weeks , he obtained the state called Bodhi-juyan , by which Bud- dhists are said to understand supreme wisdom. The words in Hebrew may mean individual derivation, as if to signify that the soul’s rest was to be found only in understanding its own nature. This meaning of the word is quite in keeping with the Buddhistic doctrine that a priestly assumption of mediation between a man and his Maker is impious, and that the soul’s perfection is to be at one with God, through Buddha. Sakya divided his doctrines * Tumour’s extracts inPrinsep’s Journal, p. 811. THEIR ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. 211 into three classes adapted to the comprehension of three kinds of hearers : 1, Binaya , for the com- monalty; 2, Sutra , or the principles of faith fitted for peculiar intellects; and, 3, Abhi-damma , or the supreme law of worship imparted only to Bodhi- satwas. Now we can perceive the fitness of such divisions when we find that these terms are Hebrew : 1, Binaya , the discerning of God; 2, Sutra , dis- criminating, or severing asunder (liw ) ; 3, Abhi- damma (ooi '2N), the father of worship, i.e., some esoteric doctrine, fit only for the Bodhi-satwa, he who drinks in the doctrine alone, as if in the experience of solitary meditation — the actual experimental religionist. It is not intended to deny that such a religion was propounded by an individual to whom the name of Sakya was given, but only to show the probability of his being himself one of the Sakian race, as well as taught by Buddhists, who were also of that race, and that this race was Israelitish. The father of Sakya is said to have been Raja of Kapila. Now, this place was situated between Oude and Gorakhpur, and the Saki dwelt there, and there they built a Buddha- Bitha over the relics of Sakya immediately after his death, said to have taken place 543 b.c.* If Sakya derived his religion from an Israelitish source, or was influenced by Hebrew ideas, we may ex- pect to find the fact confirmed by the symbols of his religion, as found in all Buddhist temples, but espe- cially at the topes of Sachi, or Sanchi, dedicated to Buddha, and described by Major Cunningham, whose * See Tumour’s extracts, Prinsep’s Journal, vol. vii. p. 1013. p 2 212 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: antiquarian labours, both in his research and in his writings, are worthy of the greatest praise. The topes at Saclii are themselves Sakian works, and symbols of the religion of the people of that place as existing 300 years b.c. They are but slight refinements upon the mounds of stones erected over the remains of the remarkable dead amongst Bud- dhists in other regions, and common in the early ages of the Hebrew people of Palestine. Greek art was evidently employed on the sculptured pillars by these topes; but the topes themselves are the most simple and unadorned structures imaginable, being formed to represent a hemisphere. I will not now dwell on these strange buildings, but come at once to that most interesting symbol of Buddhism, the wheel. As to the meaning of this symbol we need not go beyond the traditions of the Buddhists ; but, in refer- ence to an observation of Major Cunningham that it symbolizes the sun-worship as well as that of Buddha, or Buddha himself,* I would remark that the figure of the wheels at Sachi is precisely that of the wheel described in 1 Kings vii. 33 (1012 b.c.), which had axletree, nave, felloe, and spokes just like a chariot wheel, so that it would appear to symbolize the re- volutions of Providence as a distributive power by which all things are fitly framed together to proceed in regular cycles. That such a meaning was asso- ciated with the wheel by the Buddhists is evident; for their traditions say that, after the revolution of four thousand years of man, the King of the Golden Wheel appears. This person is born in a royal * The Bhilsa Topes, p. 352. THEIR ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. 213 family, and attains supreme dignity on being baptized in the water of the four oceans. But this is the part of the tradition to which I would direct especial attention : “ If the king would proceed towards the east, the wheel turns in that direction, and the king, accompanied by his troops, follows. Before the wheel are four spirits, who serve as guides. Wherever it stops there does the king in like manner stop. The same thing takes place in the direction of the south, the west, and the north — wherever the wheel leads, the king follows ; and where it halts, he does the same. In the four continents he directs the people to follow the ten right ways”* (that is, to keep the ten commandments.) “He is called the King of the Golden Wheel, or the Holy King turning the golden wheel.” “ The wheel turns and traverses the universe, according to the thoughts of the king.” This is the symbol adopted by Sakya to represent to his people the fact that God had illuminated and directed him to go forth teaching and governing the four quarters of the world. Therefore his people must have been familiar with the symbol. It was while amongst those people that the Chinese traveller learnt this tradition of the Wheel King. Now, where shall Ave turn to discover any possible origin of such a wonderful symbol? The prophet whom the elders of Israel consulted by the river Chebar, presented to them precisely such a symbol in these words : “ Now as I beheld the living creatures, behold one wheel upon the earth by the living creatures, with his four faces. The appearance of the wheels and their work * From Fo-kwe-ki, c. xviii. note 12, quoted in the “Bhilsa Topes,” p. 309. 214 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: was like unto the colour of a beryl; and they four had one likeness; and their appearance and their work was as it were a wheel in the middle of a wheel. When they went, they went upon their four sides; they turned not when they went. As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rings were full of eyes round about them four. And when the living creatures went, the Avheels went by them ; and when the living creatures were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up. Whithersoever the spirit was to go, they went, thither was their spirit to go; and the wheels were lifted up over against them; for the spirit of the living creatures was in the wheels. When. they went, these went; and when those stood still, these stood; and when those were lifted up from the earth, the wheels were lifted up over against them; for the spirit of the living creature was in the wheels.” (Ezek. i. 15-21.) “And the likeness of the firmament upon the heads of the living creature was as the colour of the terrible crystal . . . and under the firmament were their wings straight, the one towards the other, every one had two.” {Ibid. vers. 22, 23.) It can scarcely be necessary to prove that the resemblances here cannot be merely the accidental result of two minds thinking about a wheel ; and therefore, instead of commenting on the remarkable and coincident ideas contained in these two passages from such widely different sources, I point the reader to the at- tached engraving, which presents certain symbols of Buddha as the Supreme Intelligence. They are taken from BAS-RELIEFS at sanchi. I THEIR ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. 215 from Major Cunningham’s interesting work on “ the Bhilsa Topes,” and faithfully copied from the gates of the square enclosures of those topes. Figs. 1 and 2 present the wheel above four living creatures, or, as the word is often translated, beasts. These are supposed and understood by Buddhists to signify people brought into obedience to the ten com- mandments of Buddha; the elephants are the people of India, the lions are doubtful, but I believe they here represent the tribes of Dan and Gad, according to the prophecy and blessing of Moses: Gad — “he dwelleth as a lion, and teareth the arm with the crown of the head.” “ Dan is a lion’s whelp.” (Deut. xxxiii. 20, 22.) Now, though but one wheel appears, a wheel is understood to turn towards each quarter of the heavens, as the living creatures stand. Figs. 3 and 4 represent the frequent form of this symbol of Buddha; that is, wheels within wheels, united in a fourfold manner by a cross, to signify their straight- forward course towards each quarter of the heavens, or, as the legend of the Golden Wheel renders it, east, south, west, and north — that is, in the course of the sun. There is no turning back; thus inti- mating that the ways of God are in unerring wis- dom. When Buddhists would speak of the Unerring Intelligence ruling the universe, they name Buddha as the Great King who hath turned the Golden Wheel, and by the Great King they mean God as embodied or manifested in Godama, or Sakya, the last Buddha. Fig. 6 combines the name of Godama with the wheel of the Great King and the open lotus, also called the precious gem. The topes, or relic-tumuli, 216 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: are built in a perfectly circular form, circle within circle at the base ; and in their elevation they contain a sphere, in the centre of which the relics are laid, in a chamber of a square form (fig. 5); that is to say, pointing to the north, east, south, and west, precisely in the directions of the four gates of the outside enclosure, which is laid out in exact correspondence with the four cardinal points. This union of four- sided with circular figures is constantly repeated in these and other Buddhistic symbols, reminding us of the wheels and rings and the four faces, four sides, and fourfold character of the symbols of Ezekiel’s vision. At the base of the pillar on which the fourfold living creatures and the wheels are “ lifted up ” we see a square enclosure, each side having four divisions, and each division divided into three parts. Here we have the four-square and the twelve divisions, which to the Hebrew mind would signify the Israelitish community and their perfect equality. Thus the symbol is used in the book of Revelation in relation to the heavenly Jerusalem. The square railing around all the topes signifies the equality of all men, according to Buddhistic doc- trine. At each side of the base of the column, the tail of the Tibetan yak, or bullock ( Bos grunniens ), is seen bound together with three bands; which I may here incidentally state, I believe signifies the Scythian nation subdued to Buddha. Two worshippers, male and female, ascend the steps above this yak’s tail, in the act of perambulating around the object of wor- ship, or going up the steps, and as if passing round the tope to its summit. This is a proof of the re- THEIR ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. 217 verence in which the wheel symbol was held; but, as the early Buddhists were forbidden to worship images, ' we must understand the real object of worship to be the Supreme Intelligence Himself as expressed by the wheel of his providence. The female holds in her hand an object which I take to be similar to the cone which worshippers hold in their hands in the Nineveh sculptures, a sign of imfruitfulness. She holds it above her head. It may represent an unexpanded lotus, or sacred lily, a symbol elsewhere considered, in relation to Buddhism and Israel. A similar object stands on either side of the capital, with what I sup- pose to be the conventional representation of wings (or wreaths), two on each side, depending from it, perhaps meaning divine protection. These wings, two on each side, form the canopy* above the wheel, with stars above, enclosed in circles or wheels indicating the firmament of heaven above, and the rule of the Supreme Intel- ligence there in the other worlds of light. Around the wheel appear objects which, as Buddhist symbols, mean divine watchfulness and protection, for they seem to be chattas and topes. The latter, when dedi- cated to Buddha, are said to be inhabited by light, and symbolically they are represented with eyes. The sacred chatta , or umbrella, signifying protection, is usually seen surmounting sacred Buddhist buildings. These together, then, are equivalent to the eyes in the wheels of the prophet’s vision. f It is worthy of note * This word canopy seems to be derived from the Hebrew word meaning covering or wing. t Hr. Adam Clarke says, the eyes are the nails that fasten the spokes of the wheel. 218 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: that the capitals, or chapiters, are adorned with palm leaves, as in the Temple of Solomon, where also the wreaths about the chapiters are especially marked. These symbols, adopted by Sakya, together with what is said of the Holy King of the Golden and other wheels, afford a demonstration that Buddhism is in- debted to Ezekiel for some of its grandest ideas ; and would suggest the possibility that the prophet of Bud- dhism might even have conversed with the prophet of Jehovah, whose glory he imitates and assumes. If the date of Sakya’ s birth be correctly given (623 b.c.), he was contemporary with Ezekiel, and cer- tainly was not beyond the reach of his prophecies. According to our Bibles, his vision was imparted b.c. 595; but other chronologies place it considerably earlier. The four thousand years of the legend of the Golden Wheel are completed by the appearance of a divine man. The completion of the four thousand years from the origin of man corresponds with the period when the Israelites and other nations were ex- pecting the Messiah ; and it was then the Saviour actually came. The golden wheel is first seen in the East, and it advances to the place where the man born of royal race who is to assume all power stands. In the symbol, fig. 1, we find a star in the wheel in the firmament. Would not this accord with the lan- guage of the Magi who came to see Him who was born King of the Jews, and to whom they offered their precious things as unto God? Their reason for going up to Jerusalem they stated to be — “We have seen his star in the East." Is not the sur- mise expressed in a former chapter a reasonable THEIR ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. 219 surmise; namely, that those Magi were Israelites? and is not the additional fact concerning the Golden Wheel coming from the East, connected as the wheel is, in Buddhist symbol, with a star, an indication that the Magi who came to Jerusalem were Bud- dhists, seeing also that they occupied so long as a year and a half in coming? The advent of Krishnu , in India, which is generally supposed to be founded on a rumour of Christ's mission, corresponds with the time of that mission and that of the visit of the Magi ; and we know from Indian history, that both Buddha and Krishnu, though introduced by heretics, were artfully adopted by the Brahmins to stand amongst their gods, in conformity to a popular impulse, which they could not otherwise resist or compromise. The pillar inscription, when written in Hebrew letters, reads — □n vr-o ym wj 'no That is, “ And his passing away was as a lamentation, and my beauty and my grace are as lamentation, 0 Judges.”* As in Ezekiel, so with the symbols around the tope of Buddha, we find the figure of a man pre-eminent; as, for instance, that erected on the polished pillar on the north of the grand tope at Sachi. He stands above the remarkable symbol of the twelve squares, which in this case is at the top of the pillar instead of the base, as in that just now referred to. The man, then, seems to be represented as ruling over these twelve divisions. These square divisions * This tope is dedicated to the four Buddhas, also called Judges, the chief being Godama, whose departure is lamented. 220 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: remind us also of the breastplate of gems on the breast of the high priest, which represented the whole house of Israel. The man is girt about the loins with linen, but otherwise naked, though a nimbus, or glory, rays forth from his head. All these peculiarities point to the Divine Man of the Buddhistic creed as possessing characteristics prefigured in Ezekiel. Unfortunately, whatever colours might originally have been painted on these symbols are now lost, but we find the limbs and face of Godama, or Sakya, the mortal Buddha, always represented as bright as gold laid upon vermilion can make them, and he is usually seated on a throne ; therefore, so far, in keeping with this description — “ And above the firmament [ex- panse] that was over their heads was the likeness of a throne, as the appearance of a sapphire-stone ; and upon the likeness of the throne was the likeness as the appearance of a man above upon it. And I saw as the colour of amber, as the appearance of fire round about within it, from the appearance of his loins even upward, and from the appearance of his loins even downward, I saw as it were the appear- ance of fire, and it [he] had brightness [a nimbus] round about. As the appearance of the bow that is in the cloud in the day of rain, so was the appearance of the brightness [nimbus] round about. This was the appearance of the likeness of the glory of the Lord.” (Ezek. i. 26-28.) In enumerating the symbols of Buddhism we must not overlook the prominence given to the man, the lion, and the ox, all of which are erected on pillars at the topes of Sanchi and Sonari. These, together THEIR ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. 221 with the eagle, are mentioned by Ezekiel. The eagle, however, seems to be wanting in the Buddhist symbols ; and, instead, we have, in some places, the horse, and in others the elephant. The horse pro- bably stood for the Gothic tribes, and the elephant for those of India. The architraves over the chief entrance of the Grand Tope at Sfichi are surmounted by ivinged lions, and the bell-shaped capitals of the pillars of a palace represented in the bas-relief at the eastern gateway are surmounted by recumbent winged horses. Whatever these might symbolize, the fact of their being winged conducts the mind to their com- parison with the winged figures of the Nineveh and other Assyrian sculptures, and also to the winged living creatures (or beasts) of Ezekiel’s vision; in both which the straightforward progress or determi- nate purpose of the powers signified appear to be symbolized. (Ezek. i. 9.) That both winged lions and winged horses are found together in so promi- nent a situation, implies that the nations thus sym- bolically represented were united in the worship of Buddha. In the opening chapter of this volume the lion, the ox, the man, and the eagle are ex- plained as the standards and emblems of the leaders of the hosts of Israel. We have, then, three of these symbolized as in connexion with Buddha ; the wheel, the symbol of Buddha’s supremacy, being lifted up over them, in sign of their subjugation to his doc- trines. In addition, we have the obedient tribes of India symbolized by the elephant, and those of Gothland by the recumbent horse. The eagle, the emblem of the leader Dan, and his three associate 222 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: tribes forming his host, is wanting ; but possibly the wings themselves may be significant of the eagle- power being incorporated with the lion and the horse ; and, if I mistake not, the inscriptions to which atten- tion will hereafter be directed, will show that the dominant people of Saka in India were themselves Danites or Danes ; so that the eagle symbol may be superseded by that which represents potentiality, which will be found united with the wheel and the winces in the monogram of Godama , to be explained in a future chapter. The two magnificent polished pillars reared before the Great Tope of Buddha at Sanchi, remind us of the two pillars erected by Solomon before the house of the Lord. (2 Chron. iii. 15.) It is remarkable that all the old Buddhist pillars were highly polished , after the Hebrew manner. The pillars at Sanchi, from the base to the crown of the capital, were forty- five feet and a half high, and those of Solomon were thirty-five cubits; which, at fifteen inches the cubit, is about the same. The shaft was in one piece, thirty-two feet in height. The bell-shaped capital, adorned with an imitation of palm leaves (as in plate), is also Jewish ( 1 Kings vi. 29) ; and the two wreaths hanging over the capital may, perhaps, give us some idea of the meaning of the words, “ And the two wreaths [were] to cover the two pommels of the chapiters which were on the pillars.” (2 Chron. iv. 12.) In further illustration of the Israelitish origin of the wheels, oxen, and lions, in their fourfold con- nexion, we may refer to 1 Kings vii., xx., xxxii., xxxvi., where they are all particularized: “And THEIR ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. 223 under the borders were four wheels; and the axle- trees of the wheels were joined to the base,” or, rather, fixed together; see figs. 3 and 4 of plate. The pecu- liar significance of the four-square divisions enclosing the base of the pillar, and ahvays seen as the rail- ing around ancient Buddhist topes and all sacred objects, is intimated by the direction given by Solo- mon, that the gravings around the borders were to be “four-square, and not round” (ver. 31). The height of the wheel was to be a cubit and a half. The pillars on each of the gateways of the topes resemble those at the gates of the Temple, which Ezekiel describes as facing towards the cardinal points, as in the Buddhist topes. (Ezek. xl.) From coins discovered in those countries in which Buddhism first prevailed, it appears that the Sakas held dominion over the whole of Ivhorasan, Afghan- istan, Sindh, and the Punjab up to the year 80 b.c. A few years later the Sakas seem to have been dis- possessed of their conquests in Afghanistan and the Western Punjab by the Yuchi or Tochaoi Scythians (Goths [?]). But the remarkable feature of this sup- posed conquest is the fact that these conquering Yuchi and their leader were at once converted to Buddhism. Is it not more probable that these people were incorporated Avith the Sakas in a friendly man- ner as Buddhists, until the time of Vikramaditya , surnamed Sakari, the foe of the Sak&s, who drove them into Khorasan ; the south-Avest parts of which were hence called Sakastan or Sacastene , now named Sistan. But, as these points may incidentally be re- considered, we hasten over them now, in order to 224 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS: examine a few of the oldest Buddhistic inscriptions, which may throw farther light on this mysterious re- ligion and its originators. Yet we must first direct attention especially to those symbols which, adopted by the Sacaj and the Buddhists, have been received by ourselves, and remain with us as national em- blems and marks of our origin from those Saxons of the East. Amongst the emblems seen on the coins of Buddhist kings the trident has been mentioned. This is now peculiar to English coins; but the shield of Britannia, and the lion at her feet, are also Bud- dhist and ancient Saxon symbols (see plate at end of this chapter). Our banner of union, with the cross of St. George on it, may be seen engraved on the gates of the large tope at Sanchi or Sachi ; it is re- markable that the star banner is also there. The lion and unicorn (or their prototypes) may be seen crouching in peace at the feet of Buddha, as he sits on his marble throne at the entrance of the vast rock temple of Ajanta. The creature we vulgarly call a unicorn is more naturally portrayed there ; for the people who chiselled out that cavernous cathe- dral knew its nature better than to present but one horn, though they well knew, as we know from Assyrian monuments, that it was often conventionally so represented. Our unicorn is a strange anomaly, a bizarre, un-English beast, and yet not a mere heraldic invention — it combines somewhat of the figure of a horse with the foot and leg of an antelope, and in fact, it originated in the desire to combine two creatures in one, the antelope and the horse. These were both emblems of the Saxon race, but are found separate in THEIR ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE. 225 the Buddhistic monuments of India. The original of the unicorn is probably the Hippelaphus of Aris- totle, which is the Equicervus, or Horse-stag , of Cuvier.* This creature being usually sculptured in profile on the bas-reliefs, its two erect horns of course appear as one. Ignorant sculptors would suppose this its characteristic, and represent it in all positions as one- horned. Hence the traditionary heraldic emblem — a unicorn. There is, however, a large Tibetan goat the horns of which grow so closely together as to be almost united, and even recent travellers in the neighbourhood of Tibet have assured us that they have seen a live unicorn. In the woodcut on the next pagef it will be observed that the ante- lope has much of the outline of the horse. It is the large antelope common in the former country of the Sacae and in Tibet. It has been affirmed that it is sometimes seen with but one horn, but this arises from the two horns appearing as one when seen in profile. This antelope is the emblem of a Bud- dhist hero whose history is unknown ; but we are told that it is the symbol of the tribes descended from Joseph, who by the prophet is described as “ an antelope at a spring, and his hinds go up towards the ambuscade, and the archers harass him and shoot at him.” (Gen. xlix. 22; see Heb.)| However we * Regne Animal, ii. 2, §§ 3, 4. f The lion and the antelope are copied from Dr. Bird’s Historical Re- searches on the Buddha and Jain religions. J The above seems to be the more correct translation of the passage. There is a curious scene depicted in the frescoes of Ajanta (plate 22 of Bird’s Researches), which seems like a picture of this prophecy concern- ing Joseph. The antelope and his hinds are represented as surprised by a Q 226 BUDDHISTIC SYMBOLS may explain the symbol, we here see the origin of our royal arms, together with the source of the flag that for more than two thousand years has braved the battle and the breeze, and which will brave them still. number of hunters, while the lion is seen roaring on a distant hill. If this scene represents, as is supposed, some former transmigration of Buddha, it is not unlikely that his transmigrations will be found very much to re- semble the history of our Old Testament patriarchs. Mr 227 CHAPTER XI. BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. The mighty people who of old levied the pious sub- sidies of kings to adorn the peaceful dominion of Bud- dhism have left many stupendous monuments of their influence throughout India, Ceylon, Burmah, China, and Tibet. These people were Saxons and their con- verts. Mountains have been chiselled into polished temples at their bidding; temples which, for their vastness and design, have been contemplated with ad- miration by men who have gazed in awe upon the gigantic ruins of Egypt. Thus men leave the im- press of their creed alike upon their monuments and upon the manners of the people that succeed them, while their own history, and the origin of their ideas, lie buried in their forgotten tombs. Yet, as to the early Buddhists, the records of their devotion and their polity seem to be written on the rocks; and amidst the debris of cities vast as Nineveh fragmen- tary inscriptions attest their aspirations after a me- morial immortality and “their feeling after God.” Shall the mystic characters remain unread? No! Though these people and their language be unknown, and not a tradition of them remain amongst the present dwellers amidst the ruins of their temples, Q 2 228 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. they shall yet speak to men who desire devoutly to trace the providence of God in the history of their race. Let us look for meaning in all the records of humanity, because we believe that He who scattered man in various distinct great families through all lands will yet demonstrate to coming generations that He has seen the end from the beginning, and that the distribution of the races has been no fortuitous oc- currence, but that He who made them has marked the bounds of their habitation, and caused them to flow in different streams in fulfilment of his own word ; or, to speak more definitely, I believe that the nations which possess the Bible will be taught to see the literal fulfilment of all the prophecies in relation to all peoples, but especially as respects the connexion of the heathen with the Hebrew tribes. The monuments of Buddhism may be traced from Bactria, close upon the eastern borders of the Cas- pian Sea, through Mongolia and Tibet, to China ; and through India to Ceylon, Burinah, Siam, and the islands of Formosa and Japan. The earliest and chief ancient seats of Buddhism appear to have been Giyali and Buddha- Bamiy am. The latter was in ancient Bactria. It was a city of temples cut out of the solid rock of an insulated mountain, the remains of which are still magnificent, though the sculptures have been nearly destroyed by the Mohammedan conquerors. Two colossal statues, however, at least eighty feet high, still claim the attention of travellers. These are supposed to represent Adam and Eve, the spot on which they stand being traditionally regarded as that on which the first man was created. Colonel BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 229 Wilford traces the origin of the chief deities of the Hindus to this spot, and identifies them with the pro- genitors of mankind. I refer to this place because Buddhism seems to have extended its dominion from this point into North-western India, in connexion with the entrance of the Sac® into that country, some time before the conquests of Alexander the Great. I am not, however, aware of any inscriptions having been found either in Giyah or in Buddha-Bamiyam. It is worthy of remark, however, in connexion with our present inquiry, that Giyah, or Giah , is also the name of a place in Samaria. (2 Sam. ii. 24.) Buddha- Bamiyam may be also Hebrew, and, if so, it would mean the Buddha by the waters of the sea. As this holy mountain, the chief seat of early Bud- dhism, stands as an insulated mass of rock amidst a wide plain, it is not unlikely that it was at one time surrounded with water, as it is traditionally affirmed to have been ; hence, possibly, the name. Bactria was a district of Persia under Darius;* and subsequently the Greeks, the Get®, and the Sac® held dominion over it. A Bactrio-Saxon government extended its influence over North-western India imme- diately before the time of the Seleuc®. These facts will serve to explain the existence of the coins al- ready mentioned, which have been found so widely scattered over those parts, bearing inscriptions both in Greek and so-called Arian characters, while the sym- bols and other figures upon them are evidently Bud- dhistic. Now, if the Budii , called by Herodotus a tribe of the Medes, were the same as the Buddhists, and were * Herod, iv. 204. 230 BUDDHISTIC CAYES AND INSCRIPTIONS. Hebrews, as surmised, then in the early inscrip- tions on the rocks and cave-temples of North-western India, which are known to be Buddhistic, and supposed to have been engraved at or before the time of Alex- ander, we ought to find indications of the existence of Hebrew influence together with Buddhistic in those re- gions. In short, as I suppose that the Budii of Hero- dotus were Hebrews, and actually the first receivers and earliest teachers of Buddhism, and were, under the name of Sacte, mixed with the Getae, who also em- ployed a similar language, though in a different cha- racter, we ought to find that the inscriptions in the so-called Bactrian, Arian, Scythian, or Buddhistic character consist, for the most part, of Hebrew words, and bear evidence of being addressed, in some places at least, alike to Budii , Getce , and Sacce. This might have been inferred from considerations already presented, but now the proof will be found in the inscriptions themselves. But first it should be stated in what manner this discovery was made. While engaged in comparing the various alphabets employed in the East, with a view to trace them to their sources, I met with the eighth number of the Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society, in which there are several curious inscriptions from the so-called Budh caves near “ Joonur,” in the “ Dukhun.” They were communicated by Colonel Sykes to Sir John Malcolm, who forwarded them to the Journal as remarkably well-preserved specimens of such in- scriptions. He did not attempt an ) 7 interpretation, for indeed, at that time, the powers of the letters were quite unknown. Colonel Sykes, however, drew a BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 231 conclusion which, as it accorded with my own obser- vation, induced me more closely to examine the letters and analyse the words of these records. He says that “ Budh letters are prevalent in old Sanscrit inscrip- tions in the ratio of the antiquity of the inscription.” “ Can it be,” asks the colonel, “ that these letters are a very ancient form of the Sanscrit alphabet, and that the inscriptions are in the Sanscrit language?” So far as the letters are concerned, those competent to judge, such as Mr. James Prinsep and Professor Wilson, agree in thinking that the ancient Budh al- phabet is really the simpler and more elegant origin of the refined Sanscrit alphabet ; as it is at least far more probable that the more complicated arose from the simpler forms than the reverse. As characters of this form are found only in places known to have been connected with Buddhistic worship, they have been called Budh letters. Being found also on pillars at Delhi, Allahabad, and elsewhere, they have been named the Ldt (or pillar ) character. They are engraved also on many rocks, to some of which reference will be made. The powers of the letters are in general indubitable, from the known fact that the Tibetan alphabet is mainly derived from that of the country in which these inscriptions are found. The Budh alphabet, however, has several letters, the equivalents of which do not appear in the Tibetan. Mr. James Prinsep very skilfully traced their powers through several channels ; but I conceive it will be shown that in seve- ral instances he has mistaken them. I have appended an alphabet of the Budh inscriptions with what I 232 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. consider, after a very diligent search, the equivalent of each letter in the Hebrew alphabet; the three letters, to which Mr. Prinsep gives other powers, are marked with a X . It was merely as consisting of specimens of very ancient characters that the inscriptions referred to first became interesting to me; but, in copying them, with their equivalents in Hebrew letters, as they stood in the few inscriptions found at Joonur, a new interest was excited in my mind by the fact that the words themselves appeared to be Hebrew. I there- fore tested the matter with other inscriptions in the same, or a similar character, and the result will be seen in the following pages. (See plate and alphabets attached). Attention was first directed to the inscription No. 1. It was discovered over the doorway of a large hall surrounded by small cells or dormitories, the whole being excavated from the solid rock and ex- ceedingly well preserved. The initial monogram offered the only difficulty. It had long been deemed an inexplicable symbol of Buddhism. On careful con- sideration, the figure resolved itself into three Budh letters, namely, J, or soft G, with the vowel mark known as 0 in the Tibetan, below it, in conjunction with H. The next letter is one precisely similar to our own D turned the opposite way, and it is the capital D of the Budh inscriptions ; the point within it always stands for m. Now, it is understood that, where no vowel mark is found, the consonant takes, or may take, a after it; hence the word before us con- stitutes the name of the supposed founder of Bud- English. Modern HE8REW. A s a 8 ai X au X b bh 6 j dh Y a Y ha 77 v w u z ch n t b) i j y >i tm C2 O k =) P 1 > m n 7 n final i S E eh 7 V p P h D sd k 1 P r A s sh t tb n mch n D sht n w shu 'i ir shm aiy Vowel marks BuOH or LhAT. » >j X D> 9 1 W 7 3 «77Z f Y X" final T J) y r r y s 9 Y rm Y . n Y + 9 _ t final L 0 . I , U . I x oi . mr G C3 p* * s s % IfH ih 1C X & ^ ^ d u J * 'O “H "HD XI KI-u H P *-> $ $! d H 1 — > 3 3 Hi n3 I >-, P *- 0 3> hC UJ °7 £ rC P 1 * ►i Sfl H fc* _> p 3 n= k1 o3

-' ^ H* — I °pvJ cm 4f- v H K] H A p ^ P W HJ *> 3 6 X £5 An K7 no p P3 H ht— » H— » * xf P HD ?o d K1 ^b*— > » 4 d dpH 3g£ ^ So g < ^ ^ pa p ixl 3 ?£ai§ d “7ssj 3 H ^ocnU -) ^ 5r3 3; 4-3^ PP?cblK)H ’P CM KI ^ "S? ^Hs 6V_ ^ H-, XKcCH] ''“S'—, P C QC^-O X X 3 d0 * GX^ A? o « ,3 Do — 3 * « gw >j *j - 1 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 233 dliism, Godama , or, more exactly presenting the equivalents of the letters in Hebrew characters, we have the word nQliT, which at once suggests its derivation and significance; for, as a Hebrew word, it means God-like. The character surmounting the monogram resem- bles the object that marks those spots where relics of Godama are supposed to be deposited. When surmounting any building in China and Tibet, it is regarded as a sign of dedication to Godama , and is supposed to possess the power of protecting the neighbourhood in which it stands from the invasion of evil agencies of all_ kinds. The power of the figure, as a letter, is precisely that of the Hebrew Yod. It will be observed that it consists of three branches, and in this instance each branch is termi- nated in a cross. The exact import of this peculiarity is unknown ; but there is little doubt that it is expressive of peculiar sacredness. Certain priests of Buddha informed a friend of the writer that it symbolizes the Eternal, whom they say they worship, using words almost exactly equivalent to those of Milton : “ Him first, Him last, Him midst and with- out end.” In short, like the Yod of the Hebrews, it expresses the incommunicable name. It is a sym- bolic letter, and in its form ( u> ) closely resembles the Coptic letter * , which also stands for Yod, and signifies “ potentiality,” like the Hieratic Egyptian S, which in Hieroglyphic is formed thus ' HYiYK This would be an expressive Budh symbol, namely, the indwelling Deity. Three Yods, with Kamats underneath, according to the Chaldee paraphrases, ex- 234 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. press the Holy Name. Thus the high-priest amongst the Jews, to signify that Name, was accustomed to extend his three fingers thus ^ making a figure similar to this Budh letter. The name Allah in Arabic is written also with three upright strokes joined at the base. Galatine* has proved that the sacred Name was also indicated by three radii in the form of a crown ^|y. The head-phylacteries of the Jews also consist of three radii; but they now place them together in the form of ttf, as the initial letter of the incommunicable name Shaddai. The relation of the initial letter in our first inscription to the sacred Name is, therefore, very probable, irre- spective of the evidence derived from the inscription itself. We may infer that the whole monogram is symbolic; the upper part, or covering, representing the sacred name, the lower part the temple, and the letter like a half-moon at its side symbolizing the worshippers, according to the lunar doctrine, or that supposed to be derived from the ark — pre- served forefather of the world after the deluge ; so that the name Godama hieroglyphically signi- fies the Supreme, the Temple, and the worshippers; while phonetically it means resemblance to God. This very word God, as the name of the Su- preme, is derived to us from the East through a Saxon channel, and seems to be from the same source as God’ama, the name of the founder or im- prover of Buddhism. Godama is the word which gives us our name for the Deity, and Wodensday as * Lib. ii. cap. x. fol. 49 and 60. BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 235 his day, the word Woden being known in Saxon first as Goadem, and then Goden, and ultimately Woden. The whole inscription No. 1, in Hebrew letters, reads thus : — rts dot n 1^1 nnj nvn tfp oirfi Which, literally translated, is — Godama [or Jodama ], King of Kash, founded these roclc- chambers for us, and, to him devoted, the penitent* will worship in silence. The terminal word is often seen in Buddhistic inscriptions, both at the beginning and the end, as in several now before us. The letters forming it .are combined in the form of a wheel-like cross. A similar figure is found in certain tombs in the cata- combs at Rome, and may possibly have had a similar significance with some of the early Christians, instead of being used as a sign of the cross, as asserted by Dr. Wiseman. Or it may have indicated the country from whence the martyr came, namely, the country of Poonah, in India, to which the power of Rome had at that time reached. It is remarkable that the district or collectorate in which these inscriptions are found is named Poonah , or Punah , which is precisely the word here trans- lated penitent. It signifies a turning away of the mind from any evil; but possibly the word stands for the country being personified in the Hebrew style and addressed as representing the nation. Poonah is a city in Aurungabad, formerly the capital of the Western Mahrattas, and now gives name to a dis- trict in the Presidency of Bombay. Lon. 74° - 2 E. Lat. 18°-20 N. * Or “ he who turns away. 1 236 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. That the Hebrew equivalents of the characters in this inscription are correctly given will scarcely be disputed by any competent person. We have then a Hebrew inscription on a rock-temple in India, not indeed in Hebrew characters as now known, but in a variety of letters, which seems to have formed the basis of the Sanscrit alphabet, the vehicle of the sacred language of the Brahmins; a fact sufficiently suggestive of thought to detain us here. We will, however, only pause to remark that the Hebrew character now in use was adopted after the Baby- lonish captivity, and that the character previously employed in writing Hebrew was, according to Jerome, of a squarer form than that now employed for the purpose. This so-called Budh character might then have been the very character originally used, for in its squareness it answers to the descrip- tion, since all the letters consist of parts of a square; at least, they do so in the oldest inscriptions dis- covered, though in more recent inscriptions the letters V and T are sometimes written round and sometimes square. There is no violence, therefore, in the supposition that the character before us may have been the original Hebrew character, and the children of Abraham by his concubines, who, as some think, went into India,* may have conveyed it there ; if, indeed, Abraham himself did not come from Mheysh-ur , as Major William Stirling has laboured to prove.f May not a confirmation of this idea be yet found on the rocks of the Wady-en-Nehiyeh , in * He sent them away “eastward, uutothc east country." (Gen. xxv. 6.) f The Rivers of Paradise, chap. iii. BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 237 that part of Canaan where Abraham first abode after his entrance on that land ? The Rev. H. Bonar found inscriptions there, which, if we may judge from the few specimens of the letters he has given us in his book,* resemble those on the rocks in India. The intercourse of Judea with India was very early, and in the Maccabees we read of elephants being employed in their war, with Indians to rule them. (2 Maccabees vi. 37.) But, dismissing this consi- deration, we have proof in these inscriptions that the disciples of Godama and the people who worshipped at Joonur at the time used Hebrew words. But, before we proceed to the proof in other inscriptions, let us inquire what country or place it was over which Godama is said to be king. Hash, or Cash, we know was anciently the name of the holy city Benares and of the country around. But probably the name extended to districts very wide apart; and certainly if Godama , or Saicya , the founder of modern Buddhism, was acknowledged as prince where his religious influence extended during his lifetime, it must have been very wide indeed, since we find Buddhistic remains similar to those of Benares in Delhi, and elsewhere, even from the Oxus to the mouth of the Indus. Cutha , Gotha , Touran , and Kash-gar were probably included in the dominion of Godama or his Buddhist successors. Kash was a very ancient name — the Philistim came out of Kash- lulim (Gen. x. 4) ; and it is worthy of remark that the Philistim and the Hebrews spoke a similar language. Probably Cush is a word of the same derivation as * The Desert of Sinai, p. 309. 238 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. Cash , or Rash. The country known as I?ido- Cush is the original Cush of Scripture, Oriental Ethiopia, the land compassed by Gihon , one of the rivers of Para- dise. The grandson of Noah, and son of Ham, gave name to this country. This Cush was the father of Nimrod, the founder of Nineveh, some of the grand remains of which we may see in the British Museum. It is interesting to find that the traditions of the Brahmins agree so well with the records of Holy Writ as respects the sons of Noah. They say that the ark-preserved saint, the seventh of the holy ones, is the father of the race now inhabiting the earth, and that the names of his sons were Charma (Ham), Shama (Shem), and Jyapeti (Japhet). The names agree better with the Hebrew than the English, but they are quite near enough to prove their derivation from a similar source. Now, the tradition in India further affirms that Cush, the son of Charma , or Ham, gave his name to the country known as Indo- Cush. From this land came the Palic people, who overran Ethiopia Proper (outer Cush), and also gave their name to Palestine. The Pali (so called by them- selves) are numerous still in Matsyadesa , a countiy north-east of the junction of the Ganges with the Kosi, or Cushi , near Rajinahal. The force of this name Pali will appear in reference to some of the in- scriptions to be considered in the succeeding chapters. Our next step is to find some association between Godama, King of Kash, and Sakya, Sak, or Saka, other names applied to the founder of Buddhism. The inscription, of which No. 2* is a facsimile , will * No. 13, in the work already mentioned. BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 239 furnish the intelligence we seek. Here we have a ruder form of the monogram already explained. The J, or soft G, surmounts the wing-like expansion which is known to signify the same as the fuller form pre- sented in the former inscription ; the upper parts of the letter, equivalent to h? or ho, being taken for the whole, as in the Tibetan. Thus, room is made for the D to be placed under with the point, meaning M, in it. The D is observable from its rounder form, resembling the Budli letter, that is, like an 0, but which has the sound of the Hebrew teth — T ; and thus also we find in Buddhist writings the D and the T are apt to be used interchangeably, at least in this sacred name, as when transferred to Ceylon, Burmah, and Siam, where it is as often Gotama as Godama. This form of the monogram is seen in several coins of ancient date discovered where Buddhism formerly prevailed. An engraving of one will be found in plate 9, No. 10, of Prinsep’s Historical Results ; and amongst the coins referred to in Chapter VII. of this volume. Inscription No. 2 in Hebrew characters would read thus : — \n:n ter 'TS-to raw in it dp nanri' ■p rurr '31037 dip nni aa-a nr 1 ?' qbt 'iw Godama, this name is that of Sak, the shelter of him vSho is penitent and afflicted ; let him worship the Lord Almighty ; abiding beside the protection of the re- nowned religions law, the poor shall sing of him who made me. The name Godama seems to have been given to Sakya after his death, when, as Buddhists believe, he became like God. The word translated Almighty has a peculiar vowel-mark that occurs in no other 240 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. word found in the Budh inscriptions, and so far it resembles the equivalent Hebrew word. This inscrip- tion was found quite perfect, deeply engraved on the side of the rock-chamber, being nearly the most western of the caves in the picturesque hill about two miles from “Joonur.” All the inscriptions in that hill are well preserved; a reddish, ochry, hard cement having been laid over the smooth panels chiselled in the rock, and the letters then having been cut through this cement, so as to preserve the fine edge of the stone from the action of air and moisture. This method of preserving stone affords a hint as to our Houses of Parliament, the fine chiselling of which is already suffering from our damp atmosphere. The large temple of this rock monastery is very imposing. The vast arched roof appears as if sup- ported by stone ribs, that meet and rest on numerous octagonal pillars, on each of the capitals of which repose two elephants and two lions, probably signi- fying the two nations united in worship at this place. The whole is tasteful and grand. The people who formed such a place must have been skilful and in earnest. Near this temple, in the vestibule of which the first inscription containing the name of Godama was found, there is a chamber which seems to have been a refectory. It is fifty-seven feet deep by fifty in width. On each side runs a stone seat, and there are eighteen cells opening into this supposed refec- tory, with a stone bench in each. From the resem- blance of the whole to other places now occupied by Buddhist monks, there is great probability that BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 241 the’ ancient occupants of these chambers were also Buddhist monks. An inscription (No. 3)* over the door of the temple will illustrate in some degree the worship there observed, as it conveys a sentiment which we may suppose was held of importance, since it occcupies so conspicuous and prominent a position. Given in Hebrew characters it reads thus niaty j-ntyJ? law ms j u 1 ? -to “in Vo ms ms hoot *n nm my’D o~rn mt msj O penitent, all is but as the early dawn to us ; as the vermilion fruit-tree is to a field of thorn, so are the six divisions [roots'] of my judgments. 0 devoted one, let us cultivate the forest ; let the penitent worship in silence. Probably the vermilion fruit-bearer is the pome- granate, which appears to have been the tree both of life and of knowledge with the Egyptians, and no doubt with the Israelites also. The fruitful tree is the symbol of the family and of the blessing of Joseph. (Gen. xlix. 22.) It seems in this place to designate 'the people of Godama, and in the next inscription the same word is distinctly used as the name of a race, which suggests the possibility that the Parthians ( Prath ) derived their name from the same source. The following inscription (No. 4) is a modification of the preceding one, and in Hebrew characters reads thus : — mm im? ms t 6 pw-3 in Vd ms (? iinn) ms dot nn mn wp 'm isru O penitent, all is but as sackcloth to the generation of the vermilion fruit-tree ; and behold, as to be in want is my renown, the praise of the devoted is Jfash [or endurance ] ; let the penitent worship [or wait in silence ]. * No. 10 of Colonel Sykes’. R 242 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. The final word, like the initial, forms a cross, but of a shape somewhat different, as if turned in the opposite direction. As we must suppose this de- signed, it probably stands for another word, which seems to make in our Hebrew characters "linn, the wanderer , or turner of the wheel ( ?) ; a name adopted by the roaming priests of Buddha in Bhotan and Tibet. These strange men ^travel about, turning the wheel of prayer like a child’s toy in their hands, constantly muttering the mysterious words, Om mani pad me hum. These words have received explana- tions as mysterious as themselves. I obtained a copy of the words from Darjeeling, which was written by an intelligent Lama of Bhotan ; but his explanation is none, except so far as he states that they are a prayer for all living creatures, the words them- selves being inexplicable. It is beautifully written in Tibetan characters; which, being exactly transliterated into Hebrew letters, read thus 13 Qirj; which, literally translated, is 0 trouble , my portion redeem from destruction. The Tibetans say that the fair high-nosed people who came from the West and taught them their religion, were called SaJci (or Sacoe). This fact is stated by Csoma Korosi , who resided amongst them for three years. The heaps of ruin and rubbish which they venerate and call mani {my portion [?]) are probably similar to the objects of worship which formed part of the idolatry with which Isaiah up- braids the Israelites (lxv. 11). The name is lost by translation — “ that number indeed, it conveys no idea to us ; but the term in Hebrew is mini , a short pronunciation of mani , my portion, that is, ruin. FROM A- CAVE-TEMPLE AT JOONIIR. BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 243 But, to return to our inscription No. 4. The word Sale here is evidently equivalent to sackcloth, and suggests the probability that Salcya derives his name from this sign of mourning. Kash, as a name, may refer to the ruin of Benares by some catastrophe. The inhabitants of that city, now partly rebuilt amidst extensive ruins, are still called Kashi. We have in inscription No. 4 the important fact that the vermilion fruit-tree symbolized the generation then existing. Inscription No. 5 reads thus : — it iTr j-imn 'dip 'b in wn iwp its ' m run no >rp ,! ? pp njo ib nr 'asm Silently gather together, alas for me ! the calamity of this injury is my renown, in the overturning of the injury thereof the grievousness of my lamentation was my harping, the blood of his purifying was the sprinkling of woe. The inscription No. 6 was also found in the temple under the fort at Joonur. In this temple there stands one of those remarkable emblematic monuments which the natives called dliagope , supposed always to indi- cate that some sacred relic of Godama is deposited beneath. The plate opposite presents a rough drawing of this relic-chamber erected in a recess of the temple. We here see probably the earliest specimens of Gothic arches in existence, which, together with Fig. 2, be- longing to the exterior of the same temple, indicate pretty plainly that we Western Saxons derived our Gothic architecture from the same source as our ancient brethren the Saxons of the East. We had imagined that the idea of the arch was borrowed from the outstretched arms of forest trees, meeting r 2 244 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. us if about to embrace; but we find that the Saxon Buddhists of the East meant to represent an inverted ship by their Gothic arch, in reference to the salva- tion of the righteous family from the Deluge by a ship or ark; and the idea intended to be conveyed was that of the protection Heaven affords to those who fly for refuge to the Ark provided. An idea surely as proper to our churches as to their dark temples in the rock. The ceiling of this temple is flat, chunamed, and painted in small squares; each square having within it concentric circles of white, orange, and brown. These colours, squares, and circles have meaning here, for the temples of the Buddhists, unlike our own, admit not of ornament without significance. Probably the three circles enclosed in a square repre- sent Heaven, Earth, and Hades as existing under one dominion, perfect and equal, like the vision of the spiritual Jerusalem in the Apocalypse, which is described as four-square. The colours would signify purity, love, and humanity. The initial letter of Inscription No. 6 is M, in the form of a votive offering of fruit in a basket. Four pieces of fruit stand at the to]), either to signify four persons, or the four divisions of the worshippers, and the dedication of their works unto the divinity. We are reminded by this symbol of the words of Amos addressed to the Ten Tribes: “ Thus hath the Lord showed unto me, and behold a basket of summer fruit. And he said , Amos , what seest thou 1 And I said, A basket of summer fruit. Then said the Lord unto me, The end is come upon my people Lsrael.” (Amos viii. 1, 2.) May not this BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 245 signify their adoption of Cain’s offering of the fruits of the ground, and their rejection of the prescribed typical sacrifice of animal life as the medium of atonement ? It is at least remarkable that the founder of Buddhism thus expresses the fact of the commencement of a new religious era, as we find from the inscription No. 6, which, in our Hebrew characters, reads thus : — nttf dj ay nob o '3 nra iyp ruiyrr no □y tip imrc vbm 13133 ony voin dot The change of Hash* being effected, my doctrine was extended that the people who worshipped^ me might moreover worship the Almighty. His inflictions stripped me naked ; he who is my king, according to his graciousness, made us fruitful ; the people dealt bountifully with me. Here we have further evidence that some cata- strophe, in relation to the holy city Kash, over which Godama was king, gave rise to a new order of worship. In succeeding inscriptions it will be seen in what the change consisted. We might speculate concerning the nature of the catastrophe referred to. Certain passages in the inscriptions mention fire, while others frequently allude to water, as if both fire and water had been engaged i n the destruction. Possibly some such cataclysm of the Indus then occurred as happened at Ladak twenty years ago. During December, 1840, and January, 1841, the river was low. A glacier had formed in the valley of Khunden, shutting up water enough to fill a lake twelve miles in diameter and two hundred feet deep. In the following June this weight of water suddenly * Or, the grievous change, f Or, submitted quietly to him. 246 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. burst its barrier, and rushed towards the sea in one sublime irresistible wave, sweeping everything before it from Ladak to the Indian Ocean ; a space seven- teen hundred miles in length. The origin of the Buddhist religion is hidden in the mists of time; but there is a tradition amongst the Buddhists of Northern India, which, together with the evidence here given, may throw some light on the subject. The tradition is that their religion is the primitive worship, as observed by the children of Seth. Now, whence was this notion derived? Who was Seth , and what was his worship? He was the fourth son of Adam. His name signifies set , or ap- pointed. His descendants appear to be the first who used the name of Jehovah in their worship, for it is said: “And to Seth also there was born a son; and he called his name Enos; then began men to call upon the name of Jehovah.” (Gen. iv. 26. Heb.) In keeping with this, the word Jehovah does not occur in Genesis before this passage ; a reason rather un- reasonably assigned by some persons for supposing the former parts to have been written by a different hand. The progenitor of the Hebrews, Eber, is traced by the writer of Genesis through Shem in a direct line from Seth. Now, let us imagine a de- vout Israelite, who, like the Ephraimites, had already repudiated the pretensions of the house of David, being a leader of his people, and yet frustrated in his endeavours rigidly to maintain the Israelitish worship, or any other, by some sudden stroke of Providence which rendered its observance impossible. He and his nation being thus set free from the bonds of the Hebrew, or adopted ritual, what can we imagine more BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 247 probable than that he should regard the force of cir- cumstances as a proof that some other mode of worship was demanded by the Almighty? And if so, what more likely than that he should revert to what he supposed to be the earlier patriarchal worship, which appears to have commenced amongst the offspring of Seth? Eesiding now with his brethren amongst a people who reverenced the name of Seth, and called themselves Sethites, and believing themselves, as the people of Northern India still do, the direct descend- ants of Adam’s holy son, what more natural than that he should claim kindred with them? He might, indeed, represent himself and those with him as of greater sanctity than others, seeing that they had come into India from the country of the holy moun- tain, where Adam was supposed to be interred, and where the holiest Sethites dwelt.* We suppose Godama endowed with enthusiasm, piety, and influ- ence; no greater than is proved by all we know of the history of Buddhism, if we suppose him to have re-established what he believed to be the primitive worship, only with the exception of animal sacrifice, the suppression of which, circumstances imposed by Providence had rendered necessary. The promise of the incarnation of the Messiah he might believe to be fulfilled in his own person, as the accepted Buddha; and think that all the blessings entailed on the seed of Isaac pertained to him and his disciples. If we mistake not, these rock-records contain appeals to the name of Jehovah as the Disposer of all events, and we know that Buddhism contains the sentiment * See Universal History, vol. i., and Asiatic Res., vol. x. p. 136. 248 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. so well expressed by Senault, and plagiarized by Pope: “ God applies Himself to all creatures in their operations ; and, without dividing his unity or weakening his power, He gives light with the sun, He burnetii with the fire, He refresheth with the water, and He brings forth fruit with the trees.’’* Buddha is so far like the Messiah that he is born of woman, and in human form conquers sin. In his own person he endures a baptism of sufferings, and teaches that the true life is return to God in the negation and death of self. The term Damma , employed by Bud- dhists to signify worship, designates also all that can be conceived of virtue, reverence, holy mystery, and conformity to Heaven. Regarding it as a Hebrew word, it serves to express a silent waiting on the object of reverence, and a process of thought by which the meditative soul becomes like the object of its worship, as by an actual reflection. An intelligent Buddhist would regard devotion as an endeavour of the soul to see itself in the Divine Mind as in a mirror, just as the clear heavens appear at one with the calm deep. Water permeated with light would convey the Buddhistic idea of the soul’s absorption into Deity. The universal benevolence of early Bud- dhism, the reverence for life, the adoration of one God, the reunion with Deity through the observance of every moral and religious law, would lead a serious mind to hope and believe that all true followers of Buddha would fully have believed in Christ our Lord, had his character been fully known to them. And * Use of the Passions, by J. F. Senault, put into English by Henry, Earl of Monmouth, p. 11. 1649. BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 249 it is a happy thing to believe that the multitudes, amounting at one time to half the inhabitants of this earth, were mostly converts to the benevolence of Buddhist doctrines, and may be finally judged as in a measure partakers of the spirit of Him who really took away sin by the sacrifice of Himself. We will not, however, here enlarge on Buddhism, but proceed, by other inscriptions, to show its con- nexion with Israel. The following inscription (No. 7 ) is imperfect, but the first two lines are complete ; the lacuna in the other lines are indicated by dots. The transcript, in Hebrew characters, reads thus : — nms jimp \t "in mn nr nj mo 1 ttfpn rr« inhoti wra narc-o "o rb* asw i: 1 ? u^n vn Du 2 □nin'n. 1 ? yb wdbijp mn' rrh np' di pi dbd pnm in' rate mni— • . 3 im • • • in d' rm nnooi ■ • • 4 amn im 'it m»n • • • nop issd nnw mo nw an oms run nst^n m on' Twyn & anmn rts ns' in mn mw W2 rw'j nnn hid ra'n »m umn m 'is ra' liras ran mn nrw'j np" (1) Strangers bore rule; their oppression, the calamity of my chosen ones, was their rejoicing, their speech was Pr’tka [Parthian (?)]. The bringing forth of Badh was as the violent severance of the Remnant occupying Kash, the abode of Jews, their own people. (2) We were put to silence ; they decreed destruction to us ; a strife of blood brought them to an end ; the Ruler obeyed. He whom my soul seeks, whom we worship, is an overflowing sea, Jehovah is Light ... (3) his dis- tinguishing religious ordinance produced union, and the mere humiliation of the inhabitants of Kash . . .causing equality became my splendour; for their calamity pro- duced union. (4) . . . thou waitest in silence, 0 sub- 250 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. missive one. The decree of their mouth was baldness; moreover, the bowing down extended my research, the calamity was equality ; surely their setting at liberty was here becoming. (5) Thou wast made comfortless ; the infliction of our calamity, even the necessity of the injury, became my fruit. The Feast of the Covenant was neglected, my house had obeyed; the calamity caused it to be neglected ; behold, there was great afflic- tion within us. If this bare rendering be correct, we have the demonstration required to prove the Israelitish origin of these strange inscriptions; for here the Jews are by the authors of the record acknowledged as their own people, though opposed to them. The word translated Jews is very distinct. The word given as J ehovah is peculiarly pointed, and preceded by a sign like a Yod, found in no other instance in the known Budh inscriptions, and therefore of doubtful meaning. The initial letter is J, the middle one o , with the i point, and the third v or w , also with the i point and with an open base, giving the word altogether an unique character, which reminds us of the Jewish usage in pointing this unpronounceable Name, re- quiring it to be read by the substitution of a less sacred word. In pointing out the connexion of the worship of Jehovah with the family of Seth, it was indicated that this sacred word might be expected to appear in Budh inscriptions, and I think it will be found unmistakeably in some of them to which we shall refer. I am not aware of any previous attempt to trans- late the preceding inscriptions. The transcription was made from the Budh characters into those of Hebrew; at first without the slightest idea of making Inscription found on a block, of granite on a hill a( BYRATH six kos from BHABRA between Delhi and Jeypoor. 4a H- ~XJ “O 4 p P l_b _0 ~t3 *-o p rO 1_D P < T3 4 Q 4 P d P i_D P DO P P DO 4 Q P 43 P r^ O L -o D- “l 1 oo 4 DO p 13 P -< P -o < 4 00 uJ" r< l P 1 P _r\_ . 43 P ,-< 3_n_ 3-0 43 ,DO Q P -o p> p -ip n_rL '■“) p "bo r< P P ~d <3 '-O r-< P* P i-O P r< 'i p o -o < P -h DD P P H 43 ■H P P .J> Do r--< P P + =>-< P 3 _> 'P MD <3 P ■*P P •’-C _D _l r-< P= -9 6 < ■H D> H "t -< < i i DC bo ■H P P n p _> DO Q r-< 1: ■H 4 <1 r< — I p O 4 -o < “t P ■< DO n P -o DC uo. K) P D> r ri_ 43 '-O P -3 p to 3-0 _J P H P -I ?- " l- t DO P T I 4 P 43 p i_3 C~ P r4“ _P tl 4 " 4 - 4 P uJ 4 P P DO- P '-3 P P Do r“< P ■H i — 43 4 - P i_D J 43 r— ^ -O i— ^ *0 rP cc BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 251 Hebrew words of them, but merely because Hebrew letters are the oldest, except perhaps the Sanscrit, with powers positively defined. Now, if, under these cir- cumstances, we find the characters resolve themselves into connected Hebrew words, there is an incalculable probability that those words were intended to be ex- pressed by them. Lest, however, this should only be a wonderful coincidence, let us test the matter by transcribing other inscriptions in the same character. There was one found in a good state of preservation by Captain J. S. Burt, at Byrath, near Bhabra, be- tween Delhi and Jeypoor, which Captain M. Kittoe endeavoured to translate according to the approxi- mate resemblance of the words to Sanscrit or Pali, as read by himself and corrected by Pundits. But undoubtedly he has mistaken the powers of some of the letters, and fused the words together in a manner that a full analysis of those words will by no means warrant. But, whatever their meaning may seem to be by combining the words so as to form approxi- mations to Sanscrit, the transliteration into Hebrew presents a clear sense in keeping with the inscriptions already given. That such readers as may be qualified and disposed may compare the original with the transcription in Hebrew characters, a facsimile of the inscription is an- nexed, as given in No. 202 of the Journal of the Asiatic Society of Bengal. The lines are numbered for more convenient comparison. The commencement of the first line seems to be wanting, the stone being broken at that part. The inscribed stone is in the Calcutta Museum. A corrected reading of the last four words 252 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. is given from the Asiatic Journal, 1855, No. IV., p. 324. Inscription found at Byrath, transliterated into modern Hebrew characters : — in =in arunm 'in qy nv onjo qy 1 ? vr te> i nan sjjtin nan mm m 2 bm w Tr "i HN Tin wb npa mSj; tnfy dw w Dai vr *tq nan hn mnn vr ni w mw nny-i no n/rui 3 nai nnin vm» ib '1 4 nai-ty □'inn rr m n tp 'an rr na an nai aa na mn in am 'an in \h\nty Barra aia 'nn na naN 'aw in' '^n 5 w ai 'nr on nwb im 6 nby.b niNj-ty ' 3 w msi nmw in nan 'nr rr 'ba nai nai anN n'wi im nmai arriN nrp 'in i'n ap o rn nsi 'i -pini 'n'i i 'a-i an wvr nsi "pw 'Si mnn mnn 8 nil' bbn msi iia iw □n'nnn 'in 'a; *p b na na nai anaN 11 \nnaw 'ay (1) There was destruction for the people, the Magadhim, the name of my father’s nation ; but it decided their cause, 0 brother ; yea, Badh is thy perfection, a life of calamity and pain is thy perfection ; (2) and that which is the token of the high-place [ bamath ], shall be thy mark, even the wrath of Buddha. Damma is the name I have devised for the revelation thereof; the place of the spreading of thy hand is surely that of a high-place. (3) At the elevation of Budhen, at the set- ting-up of the alabaster [image] of Su [calamity], at it there shall be the sign ; surely it is as a high-place. My hotness [wrath] shall be that which is 0 God [Jah~\, whose worship [damma’] is the wall of defence ; (4) for to him I have set up, I have set up what is strong ; the God of my wrath is wise, mark the sign thereof. Why are the portions [ mani] of the high-place those of utter destruction ? 0 God, my ruin and lamentation are a memorial of Kash. (5) The years of the suffering of Gath, with the oppression of the times of Gomatta, were mine [or are upon me] ; behold they are set up, aud the breaking of my speech is appropriate for the BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 253 going up, (6) as to the hand alike of Moses and your- selves. I will greatly multiply you by the exaltation of Budhen, by setting up the gifts of the high-place. The worship is wonderful, 0 God of my oppression ; these are as the waters of (7) the affliction of thy proving ; the ruin is a propitiation with me; thy ruin is become my possession. 0 my father, their lamentation is the calamity the woe of which was thine, but the praise of Jehovah redeemeth ; (8) he hath made known the wall of defence, even the doctrine of thy Salca, even the doctrine that is thine own ; the high-place is my might. [Dan. vii. 7.] Why ? Because my sea is my rock [or protection]. 0 my father *1 have dismayed them in the name appointed [or, I have made my nation their dread], [The last three words are nearly obliterated.] We here find a people called Magadliim , that is to say, noble. (Heb.) This agrees with history, for Magadlia is stated in the Pali Buddhistic annals* to be the kingdom whence Buddhism was introduced into Ceylon. It also appears, from these annals, that some of the sacred books of Buddhism, the Singhalese Atthakatha , were, according to certain peculiar rules of grammar, translated by Buddliaglioso into the lan- guage of the Magadhi, which is stated to be the root of all languages, This is supposed to be Pali, or more properly “ Pracrit, the dialect of Magadha .” This word Pracrit JTIDmS is, literally, the fruit of separation, and points at once to a Hebrew origin; and the fact that the inscription just given was ad- dressed to the people of Magadlia , affords a demon- stration that Hebrew was their sacred language at least ; so that we may fairly infer that the Magadhi language, said to be the root of languages, was * See An Examination of the Buddhistical Annals, by the Hon. George Tumour. — Journal of Asiatic Society, No. 67. 254 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. Hebrew. May we not, then, suppose that the so- called Pali is only the transfusion, for the most part, of Hebrew roots into Palic Sanscrit, the aspirates being softened down, just as those of Latin are in Italian. The kingdom of Magadlia was in Anu-Gdngam , a province of South Bahar. It is said, in mistake, to be so called from the Magi (wise men), who came from the Saxon country, Dwipa-Saca , and settled in the country previously called Cicata , from which its prin- cipal river is named Cacuthis by Arrian. According to Kemper, the Japanese have a tradition that Sakya , the teacher of Buddhism, was born in Magatta. The Chinese call it Molciato and Mokito. The Arabian and Persian writers convert the g into 5, and call it Mabada .* The inscription found at Byrath has the vowel marks more clearly and neatly engraven than those of “ Joonur,” in the “ Poonah ” district, and the in- formation it contains distinctly associates the names Badh and Buddha with that of a people to whom the lifting or going up of the hands of Moses was sig- nificant of superiority over all adversaries. This idea could only have arisen from a knowledge of the circumstance recorded in Exodus (xvii. 11), where it is stated that Israel prevailed over Amalek when Moses held up his hands ; and when they sank down from weariness, they were supported by stones placed under his arms. This fact also seems to be here alluded to. The name of Moses alone, however, being unmistakeably found in this inscription (line 6), * As. Res., vol. ix. p. 33. BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 255 is itself a proof that it was addressed to a people who revered this name. The association of water with a rock also reminds us of the rock smitten by Moses. The word Badh , which we found in one of the in- scriptions at Joonur, is here again presented (line 1). "VVe know that this word signifies the incarnation of the Deity, according to the creed of the Buddhists, Buddha being generally understood to be equivalent in meaning, though admitting of application to various persons attaining a peculiar degree of sanctity by pious contemplations. The Hebrew meaning of the word "in, Badh, is perfectly in keeping with its Buddhistic use, as it signifies a state of separation or abstraction, a standing alone or apart. Our word hud expresses the same idea as the Hebrew word; for we find it used to signify the shoot or branch of a tree, and in the plural is applied even to princes. A like word signifies anything having a new, distinct, or original existence. Badh or Boodh is, then, the peculiarly sacred person worshipped in the manner indicated by the word Damma , a name for the wor- ship, which it appears was invented by the author of the last inscription, a word sufficiently expressive of dumb and inactive waiting, in consequence of some terrible calamity beyond the help of man. The I Psalmist uses a form of the word when exhorting the devout to wait on Jehovah. In this inscription the word Bamath , occurs (line 2). This word is only the fuller feminine form of the word Bamah , the name applied by Ezekiel and other prophets to the worship in high-places, of which the Israelites or Ephraimites, as distinct from the Jews, who adhered 256 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. to the house of David, were guilty. Buddhism cer- tainly took this form of idolatry, and the word Bamath very appropriately stands in this inscription as applied either to the system of worship or to the place of worship. According to some lexicographers, the word is used to signify the high altar erected in the place of worship. The word Yoovah is also distinct in this inscription (line ?), and could be expressed in Hebrew letters only by Jehovah, with a different pointing. Gomattci is a name full of circumstance. Pro- bably he was the Magian who pretended to be Bardes, the son of Cyrus, whom Cambyses, his brother, had secretly slain. His name and usurpation are men- tioned in the Behistun inscriptions. He endeavoured to destroy all the people who knew the real Bardes. The Sacce , under his influence, revolted from Darius, son of Hystaspes (Dan. ii. 2), while he was at Babylon ( 522 b.c. ) : so it can be well understood how troublous were his times, since Darius mustered all his forces to encounter him. As he was a Magian, and seems to have been in the midst of the Sacce , or at least arose amongst the Arakadres ( AriaTca-ana ) mountains, the Sacae must have been involved. These mountains are close on Drap-Saca, or Dwipa-Saca , whence the Sacas came into India, as already shown. Gomatta sub- dued Persia, Media, and all the adjacent provinces. He seems to be the same as Smerdis* There is another word, namely, Mani (line 4), of peculiar sig- nificance. It is still applied in Northern India and other countries where Buddhism prevails, especially * See Behistun Inscription, Journal of Roy. As. Soc., vol. xv. p. 136, and Herod., iii. § 70. BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 257 in Tibet and Bhotan, as the names of those mingled heaps of broken things which are raised up in notable places and hills, as objects of peculiar veneration, the devout always muttering their prayers at approach- ing them, and never passing them but on the right hand. The Israelites, as already stated, worshipped objects of a similar name, as we learn from Isaiah lxv. 11, where the word in our translation is ren- dered “ number." Of these Mani further mention will be made in another place. Can we, with such evidence before us, doubt the connexion of Buddhism with a Hebrew people, in its earliest appearance in India? From Ezekiel tve learn that the Ten Tribes, to whom he addressed his warning and denunciations, would go and serve their idols (xx. 39), and yet he says, “ That which cometh into your mind shall not be at all, that ye say, we will be as the heathen.” (xx. 32.) Thus intimating that, though adopting a new mode of worship, they should nevertheless be remarkably distinguished from the heathen in general. The people to whom our inscriptions pertain cer- tainly established a mighty religious system, which even now prevails over nearly a third of the inha- bitants of the earth. The inhabitation of a divine person in the form of Buddha seems like a fulfilment of the Israelitish hope concerning the Messiah ; but the remarkable declaration of Godama, as preserved in the sacred books, should not be overlooked, for he stated that the ultimate Buddha was yet to come, namely, the Bagava-Metteyo. The meaning of those words is not known, but the resemblance of Metteyo s 258 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. to Messiah is worthy of note, and certainly the term is meant to designate a divine messenger. The sound of these Avords would be most nearly conveyed by signifying, In the excellency or victory of his Branch or Plant, reminding us of the language ad- dressed by Ezekiel to the elders of Israel, when, having predicted their defections, he foretells the restoration of blessings to the shattered flock: “They shall no more be a prey to the heathen, neither shall the beasts de- vour them; but they shall dwell safely, and none shall make them afraid. I will raise up a Plant of renown [yiao Metteyo.( ?)], and they shall no more be consumed of hunger in the land, neither bear the shame of the heathen any more.” (Ezek. xxxiv. 29.) A similar prediction is found in Isaiah xi. : “ There shall come forth a rod out of the stem of Jesse, and a Branch out of his roots.” Sakya planted a branch as a symbol and a prophecy. This Godama, or Sakya, who is the Buddha worshipped in Ceylon and Bunnah, was King of Kash, and the same Godama, or Jaudama, to whom is attributed the founding of the rock chambers of Jenoor (or Joonur), according to our first inscrip- tion ; we, therefore, possess presumptive evidence that he was a Hebrew. There is enough of the sublime and beautiful in the doctrines of this Buddha to account for their rapid diffusion amongst a people to whom self-negation, equality, patience, benevolence, and reverence for life came recommended by the high pretensions to direct inspiration and the possession of Divine virtues, by the contemplation of which the human soul might be divested of all its earth- liness and lose itself as if by absorption into the BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 259 Eternal. But still the highest teacher and most glorious deliverer was yet to come in the Bagava- Metteyo , which, as Hebrew, means precisely what the prophets of the Old Testament predicted in relation to the Messiah. It is not improbable that the Bodhi- tree (bodhi, branch [?]), under which Sakya is said to have meditated, and also the branch planted by the relic chambers and memorial tumuli of Buddha, and sent from Central India to Ceylon on the esta- blishment of Buddhism there, all had a prophetic sig- nificance in reference to the incarnation of Divinity yet to be expected. This Branch of renown in the Buddhist soil, planted as if amidst the divisions of the people, is associated with the one wheel, the fourfold wheel, the wheel of teaching or penitence, the monogram of Godama, signifying Godlikeness, the fourfold sign of power around the wheel, the sacred tau, the winged bull, and the sacred mount; for all these symbols are seen together in an ancient Bud- dhist medal, and the Branch there, as seen at the end of our introduction, takes the form of a mystic cross, the most sacred of symbols amongst the Buddhists. There is reason to believe that some great natural calamity, as already shown, gave rise to the incul- cation of the self-denying doctrines of Godama. Probably some extensive natural phenomenon, such as an earthquake or a vast inundation, producing a necessary and immediate change in religious ob- servances was taken advantage of to enforce the doctrines promulgated by Godama. The reference in the inscriptions, however, is always to fire and burning. But, before we seek for further indications s 2 2 GO BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. r of the circumstances under which the existing form of Buddhism arose, attention should be directed to a country named Gath in the Byrath inscription, line 5. This must be the land of the Getce , or Geti , a Gentile name, precisely similar to the Gittite of the Bible. (2 Sam. vi. 10, 11, 15, 18.) From this land, it ap- pears, the author of the inscription came. Now, this was the early seat of the Goths , and in the immediate neighbourhood of that of the Sacce. It is not impro- bable, then, that the house and lineage of the modern Saxon Gothas, with whom our interests as a nation are so well allied, may be traced back to the land from whence the metaphysical religionists and strong- minded civilizers, both of the East and the West, have sprung. In the Buddhistic inscriptions on the rocks of India, at least, we shall find that the Goths and Saxons were associated in the establishment of a relkrious dominion extendiim from Bactria to all O o parts of the East. Philologists have discovered that both the eastern and western civilized nations have derived words and thoughts from some common source, called by them Indo-Germanic. What if this source should prove to be mainly Israelitish? Would not this prove the literal fulfilment of prophecy with regard to the influence of the dispersion of the Ten Tribes amongst all the nations? We, at least, find an ancient Gothland , as well as a Saxon race men- tioned in the earliest records of Buddhism; and this Buddhism is, I conceive, unmistakeably connected with a people using the Hebrew language. The name of Goth, as already surmised, was probably transferred from Palestine to the neighbourhood of BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 2G1 the Caspian Sea, where the Getce and the Sacce , the Goths and Saxons, are historically found together. If, as we suppose, the house of Isaac, as Hosea calls the Ten Tribes, went into the country of the Getce, they must, according to this hypothesis, have found there multitudes descended from the people with whom their forefathers mingled in Palestine. With the Gathites their heroes did valiantly; amongst them Samson was born and trained; from them came the giant whom David slew; and from them, also, David afterwards obtained some of his faithful body-guard. The inhabitants of the country of Gath, or Goth, spoke the same language as the Israelites. There is another people who formed a sect amongst the early Bud- dhists, namely, the Jains, as they are now called. They were distinct in origin from the Sacce and the Getce , and were probably Greeks, or Javans , a desig- nation well known in India, and probably corrupted into Jains. In this origin we obtain an explanation of their great excellence in architecture and sculp- ture, as seen in their vast temple at Allora,* and also of their worship of the fecundating Power which was worshipped by the Grecians, or at least by the Thracians and Phrygians, many of whom were left in Western India by Alexander. It is interesting to find that the Gothic and the Saxon races are as well known in Asia and the far East as in Europe and the far West. They over- threw the Greek and Syrian dominion in Bactria and India, and overran Asia in the vigour of their con- * This temple, with its splendid statuary and noble columns, is hewn out of solid rock and polished in every part. 262 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. quests, as they did Europe in later times, infusing new manhood into peoples become utterly effeminate and corrupt. The Saxons of the East became nominally Bud- dhists, the Saxons of the West became nominally Christians. In both directions they have been, and are, the missionaries of thought and charity to the world. If, as we believe, they were derived from the apostate house of Israel, we see those prophecies fulfilled concerning Israel, which, as to general import, declare that, though absorbed amongst the nations, and lost as to name, they are yet the seed preserved of God, and by no means to remain unfruitful in the earth, but rather, as having amongst them the bless- ing of Joseph, are to realize a multitudinous increase and prosperity. The prophecy of promise said, “ Israel shall blos- som and bud, and fill the face of the world with fruit.” (Isaiah ii. 6.) And if that prophecy be ful- filled or fulfilling in any people, it is the Saxon. In the East they have not been unproductive of good fruit, for they not only promulgated a creed that promised life from death, but they infused an energy of mind into their metaphysics only less refined than that of Germany, and a working power into their daily life only inferior to the practical industry of England. We believe that the earliest Buddhists of North- western India were Saxons, sent forth into the Eastern world to prepare the ground for the missionaries of the West. We have proofs of their religious prowess still extant in all Eastern Asia. The influence of BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. 263 their efforts two thousand years ago is still felt in India, Ceylon, Burmah, Siam, and China. They broke down caste and destroyed brute worship, by demanding thought as the foundation of belief, and by teaching- equality and good-will as the ground of moral excel- lence. Their disciples and descendants still profess to be open to new truths, and they are expecting another Messiah. They everywhere multiply books, and teach their children to read. The ground they occupy lies fallow, but ere long to be broken up to receive the seed of a heavenly harvest. On the vigorous offshoots from the same stock have been grafted those buds of the tree of life which shall ex- pand until they overshadow the whole world with fruitful branches. The Saxon tribes, like those fore- shadowed in the forms of life seen in Ezekiel’s vision, have mingled with the cloud of people from the North, and imparted to races, otherwise too sensual to be anything but slaves, an intellectual and character- istic independency of spirit. They have gathered spoils of language and thought from all the suc- cessive races that have held dominion near them. They have conquered all the conquerors. The kings of Assyria, Media, and Persia subdued them only to be supplanted by them. Grecian prowess and intel- lect lived only till the Saxon energies were fully kindled by contention with them ; and now the writings of their sages live but to illustrate the Saxon Bible and discipline the Saxon intellect. The study of the forces inherent in creation goes along with the unshackled teaching of revealed doc- trines, for these teach men understanding, and to seek 264 BUDDHISTIC CAVES AND INSCRIPTIONS. the laws of God in the works of his hand, as well as in the logos of reason addressed to their moral con- sciousness. Hence the best believers are the best explorers, expositors, and practical workers, for they are working with knowledge of God’s methods; so true is it that u He hath showed his people the power of his works , that he may give them the heritage of the heathen." (Ps. iii. 6.) Roman valour merely prepared the way for Saxon advancement; and now, after twenty centuries of social metempsychosis, the Saxon race, bearing phy- sical and intellectual regeneration in the manliness of their social institutions, scientific enlightenment, and religious faith, under the guidance of an all- wise Providence, hold dominion over those Indian nations from whom their forefathers seem to have obtained some of the germs of their civilization ; and thus we believe is fulfilled the promise, that the scat- tered seed should fill the world with fruit. CHAPTER XII. THE INSCRIPTIONS AT GIRNAR AND DELHE Before proceeding to other inscriptions which may serve further to illustrate Buddhism, we may well contemplate with interest what we have already seen. First, we ask, what is meant by those vast mounds and strange memorial heaps of ruin held sacred to desolation and to Buddha? We shall find an answer at full in the rock-records before us, and also in the fact, that heaps were to be the signs of the progress of the Ten Tribes in their wanderings, as intimated by the prophet Jeremiah (xxxi. 21). Seeing that from the earliest period of the Saxons they may be traced by similar signs, as we discover in Moecia, Scythia, Cabul, Western India, Saxony, and England, can we avoid an inference that the Lost Tribes and the Saxons were related, not only in those relics, waymarks, and tokens of their dispersion, but also in their origin, as a distinct race? Such memorials have always marked the Saxons, until the religion of the Highest taught them to build churches. And now those churches, in their arched and Gothic gloom, remind us of the cavernous cathedrals of Kanari, Karshi, Ajanta, and Junur. True, our churches are illumined by a more radiant lamp of life than that of 266 THE INSCRIPTIONS AT Godama; but yet his prophetic branch, and budding cross, and expanded lily, and perpetual light seem fa- miliar to us ; and the orient wheel, chiselled in marble, seems uplifted as a window, to receive the coloured rays, in which the light of heaven is softened to our vision, while still serving as a sign of the present Spirit that rolls all the worlds along. We ask, what could induce those earnest Saxons of the East to carve the mountains into temples, and immure them- selves in gloom? They, too, felt “ the burden of the mystery of all this unintelligible world.” Perhaps, with a terrible sense of the sinfulness of their hu- manity, they felt after the Almighty Deliverer, and yet, seemingly left only to the deluder, they, with glimmering lamps, sought the Author of light and heaven in caves and dens of the earth. They be- lieved in the Everlasting as the Ever-changing, and held their creed with the reprobate tenacity of des- peration. To them the humanity of God was not the charity that makes men’s homes lovely, by making worship consist in working together for each other’s happiness; and so they rested their souls in darkness, expecting to become more Godlike by becoming in- human. Their devotees taught social duties to all but themselves. They must have once entertained grand hopes of an especial favour in the sight of Heaven, but found their aspirations met only by calamity, and so they worshipped that. They adored Ruin, and their holiness was the extinction of their hearts. They found this life vanity, and sought their perfection in abnegation. To them Omnipotence was desolation, and the Immanuel they chose for them- selves was a mad prophet, who taught them that GIRNAR AND DELHI. 267 nakedness and suffering, emptiness and death, would lead them to the possession of an eternal state of ab- straction in perpetual fellowship with solitude. Thus was fulfilled unto them the prophesied “ days of visi- tation,” when “ the prophet should be a fool, and the spiritual man mad ; for the multitude of their iniquity and the great hatred.” (Amos ix. 7.) Still Godama appears to have taught, with the shadow of an eternal truth, that resignation to the will of Heaven would secure victory over sin and death. According to the Litany of the Tibetan Buddhists, Godama professed to have taken upon himself the nature of man, in order to suffer for the good of all living beings, and that, when himself free from sin, he also desired to free the world from sin.* There are many points of resemblance to the Psalms of David in the Psalms chanted by the Bud- dhists of Tibet. The priest and congregation sing alternate verses in honour of Godama, praising him as the Saviour from sin ; thus imitating the character in which the Messiah is predicted in the Psalms and other parts of the Old Testament, as the following words, taken at random from multitudes of others of like kind, will show: — Priest: “The Illuminator of the world has arisen; the world’s protector; the maker of light, who gives eyes to the world that is blind, to cast away the burden of sin.” Cong. : “ Thou hast been victorious in the fight; thy moral excellence has accomplished thy aim; thy virtues are perfect; thou shalt satisfy men with good things.” Priest: “Godama is without sin; he is out of the * See Hymn translated by Csoma Korosi, Prinsep’s Tibet, p. 153. 268 TUE INSCRIPTIONS AT miry pit; lie stands on dry ground.” Cong. : “ Yea, lie is out of the miry clay; he will save others.” These words seem like a response on behalf of Godama to these of the prophetic Psalms : “ In thy majesty ride prosperously, because of truth, and meekness, and righteousness.” (Ps. xlv. 3.) “He brought me up out of a horrible pit, out of the miry clay, and set my feet upon a rock.” (Ps. xl. 2.) Such coinci- dence cannot be accidental, and can only point to a common source. Thus we have in Buddhism a mock Messiah, in accommodation to the felt wants of men demanding a really divine Saviour in their own nature. The records of early Buddhism, the express teaching of Sakya, and the symbols represented in the most ancient memorials of his religion, prove, however, that its first form was far higher in character and purpose than at present appears amongst the wor- shippers of Buddha, except, perhaps, in some parts of Tibet, where, according to the Jesuit missionary Hue, t he doctrines of Christianity, as presented by him, were recognised as precisely similar to the Buddhism of their creed. But Godama, while presenting himself as a Saviour from sin, too palpably manifested his madness by insisting upon a multitude of meritorious sacrifices in the form of an asceticism that unfitted a man for all the holiest duties of life, and positively made him incapable of obeying any of the known laws of God in relation to his place, either in the family or society in general ; for the very benevolence incul- cated was only that of fellowship in a hopeless ruin, from which there was no escape but in the entire loss GIRNAR. AND DELHI. 269 of individuality by return to God. This system of religion was probably instituted in consequence of some overwhelming catastrophe, which destroyed the metropolis of Godama’s kingdom, and rendered it impossible to observe the ritual previously established. He turned the desolation to account, and gave forth his edicts for a new order of things. In evidence of this, we will now examine the inscription found at Girnar. It consists of about 100 lines, in tw'o divi- sions. The fourteen sections in the engraving repre- sent only the junctions in the muslin on which the impressions of the inscription were taken. On a rock at Kapur-di-Giri there is nearly a verbatim repetition of the Girnar inscription, and that inscription is in the so-called Arian or Bactrian character, and reads from right to left; the Girnar inscription, however, reads from left to right, so that the direction of the line seems to have differed even among people using the same language. The Hebrew transliteration is transferred to the Appendix. The translation is made as literal as possible, and elegance has been altogether disregarded, the inten- tion being to give the sense of the original in its own idiom, not ours. That the ideas may stand out as clearly as the literal rendering will allow, each senti- ment is given in a sentence beginning with a capital, like a line of verse, as by this means the parallelisms, the peculiarity of Hebrew poetry, become more appa- rent, and the force of the “refrain,” with which, indeed, the lament commences, and which is so fre- quently repeated, becomes more manifest. 270 THE INSCRIPTIONS AT THE GIRNAR INSCRIPTION IN ENGLISH. (1) The waters are my worship, my dimma* my doctrine ! f The mouth of Ruin hath pleaded their cause, Destruction hath become their enlightenment. Go forth, diligently persuade them ; 0 Dan, arise for their overthrow ; My doctrine hath broken the Arab in pieces. The day of affliction is become the season of life ; He heareth the stroke of his ruin ; Your trial shall be a life of fatness. He heareth I make Destruction Life; The mouth of Ruin hath pleaded their cause. Destruction hath become a friend. H is breaking to pieces I have made thy fruition. He heareth the Almighty Lord of the dead ; The mouth of Ruin hath pleaded their cause. Destruction hath become their enlightenment. 0 people, forget the fatted bull ! The mouth of Ruin hath decided theib cause 1 Those Destruction hath become their enlightenment, The endurance thereof shall be even renown ; Their doctrine is established by that which dismayed me; Calamity [