•" C)^ ;»'.i» JON 37 !9m ') BX 9178 .Al S67 1840 The Spruce Street lectures THE ^ SPRUCE STREET LECTURES: BY SEVERAL CLERGYMEN. DELIVERED DURING THE YEARS 1831-32. TO WHJCU IS ADDED A LECTURE IMPORTANCE OF CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS, y BY SAMUEL MILLER, D. D. Pi-of. of Eccltsiastical History and Church Government in Theol. Sem. Princeton, N. J. PHILADELPHIA: PRESBYTERIAN BOARD OF PUBLICATION WILLIAM S. MARTIEN, PUBLISHING AGENT. 1840. THE ELDERS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES, THIS VOLUME RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED BY THE EDITOR. THE EDITOR'S ADVERTISEMENT. To the Members of the Presbyterian Church. This course of Lectures was founded in prayer. The design was to furnish the members and families of the Presbyterian Chuj^ch, with a Manual containing interesting and popular discussions of some of the most important subjects, both doctrinal and ecclesiastical, taught in the "Confession of Faith." When doubts are entertained in regard to any point of faith, taught by our holy religion and our venerable stand- ards, it is important that the members of the Church should be furnished with a calm and able defence of those truths which are called in question. The well known character of the gentlemen engaged in this course, will be regarded as a sufficient recommenda- tion of the volume. Although the work is especially dedicated to the Elders of the Presbyterian Church, yet it is commended to the patronage of all its members. And that the Spirit of God may attend this defence and inculcation of the truth which He inspired, is the prayer of your brother in the Gospel, SAMUEL G. WINCHESTER, Philadelphia, January, 1833. CONTENTS. Page- Preface, . . ^'^ . • v Introduction. By Rev. Dr. Green, . . ix Lecture I. — The Inability of Sinners considered. By Rev. Dr. fisk, . . 9 Lecture II. — The Fall of Man^-and its effects. By Rev. Dr. Uaneway, . 41 Lecture III. — The Use of the Means of Grace. By Rev. Dr.^ow, . 69 Lecture IV. — On Church Discipline. By Rev. Mr. M'Farlane, . .105 Lecture VI. — On the Nature of the Atonement. By Rev. Professor Hodge, 143 Lecture VII. — On Ecclesiastical Polity. By Rev. Dr. "Miller, . . 171 Lecture VIII. — On Regeneration. By Rev. Dr. 'Martin, . . .215 Lecture IX. — On Justification. By Rev. Dr. "Neill, . . . 239 Lecture X. — On Christian Missions. By Rev. John Breckinridge, . . 255 ADDENDUM. Lecturfe on Creeds and Confessions. By Rev. Dr. Miller, . . . . . 299 ERRATA. Page 10, line 7 from top, /or declation read declaration. " 12, "14 " for divide read describe. " 37, " 1 " for planned read placed. " 74, " 5 " for And the read Another. " 92, " 2 " strike out must. " 173, " 5 " for sustain read restrain. " 210, " 8 " for ask read act. INTRODUCTION, BY REV. ASHBEL GREEN, D. D. OF PHILADELPHIA The framers of the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church in the United States, introduced their Form of Church Government by specifying certain ''preliminary principles," or fundamental truths, as the basis on which the whole superstructure had been erected, or by which, as they express it, ''they were governed in the formation of the plan. " In this statement of radical or elementary principles, the fourth section is as follows: "That truth is in order to goodness; and the great touchstone of truth, its tendency to promote holiness; according to our Saviour's rule, 'by their fruits ' ye shall know them.' And that no opinion can be either more pernicious or more absurd, than that which brings truth and falsehood upon a level, and represents it of no consequence what a man's opinions are. On the contrary, they are persuaded that there is an insepa- rable connexion between faith and practice, truth and duty. Otherwise it would be of no consequence either to discover truth or to embrace it" "The innocence of error," was a favourite dogma of in- fidel writers and loose moralists, of the last age; and it was X INTRODUCTION. against this, that the foregoing statement was intended to he more immediately directed. But this mischievous sen- timent was, it is believed, never so openly avowed and formally defended, as in the present age; for it is only a modification of the principle, while the essence is retained, which we find now advocated by some of the most distin- guished literary men of Europe, in the position ''that a man is not responsible for his belief or opinions." To de- monstrate the falsehood of this baleful doctrine, which goes to the subversion of all moral obligation, and all religious faith and practice, is now the task of the able and erudite friends of revealed truth and Christian duty, both in the old world and the new. But many reject (it may be with honest abhorrence) the error we contemplate, when broadly stated and viewed in its extreme, who, nevertheless, tolerate it, and even plead for it, in some of its degrees and modifications. What but this is virtually advocated, when a strict and strenu- ous adherence to sound doctrine and a jealous fear of its violation, are made the subject of undisguised reproach, or represented as the indication of a narrow and bigot- ted mind; and when active exertions for the promotion of visible religion are extolled, as marking not only great- er liberality of mind, but more of genuine piety, than is to be expected among those who are tenacious of an orthodox creed? This we often hear; and does it not imply that truth, or just principle, is not necessary to the best action ? is not always /aiJowrai/e to it? or, maybe even lessfa- ^ INTRODUCTION. xi vourable than principles received with little examination, and partaking of a mixture of error? Now the very oppo- site of this is held, and it is believed must be held, by all who understand and honestly profess an attachment to the standards of the Presbyterian Church. It is readily admitted that there may be a zealous contention for abstract principles of truth, or for sound and orthodox doc- trine, without activity in promoting the cause of God in the world; yea, with the destitution of all vital and practical god- liness. The truth may be held in unrighteousness. Let this, whenever apparent, be unsparingly censured and pointedly condemned. Let it be shown, as it easily may be shown, that there is a glaring inconsistency between what they pro- fess, and what they do, or what they refuse to do, in all who maintain with ardour the truth as it is in Jesus, and yet vio- late his precepts themselves, by withholding their best energies for the extension of his cause and kingdom, and the salvation of perishing sinners. But let it not be inti- mated or implied, that there is any other safe and firm basis for right action, than truth or sound doctrine; far less, that without this, there may be a better practical system than with it. If such, for a time, seem to be the fact in any given instance — as it is conceded that it may — the result will assuredly prove, that when the mixed system of truth and error becomes fully developed, and is seen in its fruits, effects and consequences, the want of strict adherence to sound doctrine will be strikingly and lamentably apparent, in practical evils of a very pernicious character. In a word, xii INTRODUCTION. let it be remembered, that as there is an icy orthodoxy, so there is also a fanatical heat, and that both are to be carefully avoided; that the truth is to be strenuously main- tained, and to be fully carried out into practice; and that that practice or course of action will be the most correct, the most exemplary, and the most firm and efficient, which rests for its foundation on the greatest measure of truth, held in its greatest purity. So says, and truly says, our Consti- tution, as already quoted, "Truth is in order to goodness — there is an inseparable connexion between faith and prac- tice, truth and duty; the great touchstone of truth is its tendency to promote holiness." The fact is too palpable to be denied, that in the Presby- terian Church, at the present time, doctrines not in accord- ance with our public standards, are freely promulgated, both from the pulpit and the press; that it is a favourite topic with many of the advocates and propagators of these doc- trines, to represent them as better adapted to the awakening of careless sinners, producing revivals of religion, and mul- tiplying converts, than those contained in our Confession of Faith and Catechisms — understood as these formularies cer- tainly were understood, by those who formed them, and as they are still held and taught, by those who adhere to them in their genuine import. Those who think that they ought to disregard or violate our doctrinal creed, do not act consistently in retaining their connexion with a Church whose standards they consider as impeding and restraining the best and most efficient action for the good of mankind, and the glory of the INTRODUCTION, xiii Redeemer: and while they remain, it is reasonable to think that they will embrace any favourable opportunity to effect such changes in the doctrinal system of the Presbyterian Church, as shall render it more in conformity with their own opinions — unless, indeed, the example of Geneva shall be preferred and followed, where the doctrinal standards, framed under the auspices of Calvin and Beza, have remained un- touched, while all the leading doctrines they embrace are renounced and ridiculed, and their adherents reviled and persecuted. Believing that the doctrines of the Confession of Faith and Catechisms of the Presbyterian Church, are those of the reve- lation of God, most accurately systematized and correctly stated; and consequently that they must be more favourable than any other to the advancement of genuine Christianity, and the eternal salvation of the souls of men; believing also that they admit of a fair and effectual defence, on the princi- ples of sound reason and philosophy, as well as of sacred Scripture; and believing, in fine, that such a defence was loudly called for, when these doctrines were impugned, muti- lated, disparaged, or disfigured, even by writers and speakers who had adopted them solemnly and formally — those who planned the Spruce Street Lectures, determined to solicit from some of their brethren, whose talents and opinions were known to qualify them eminently for such a service, the discussion of certain leading and fundamental points of our doctrinal standards, in a series of Lectures, of which each speaker should deliver one. It is greatly regretted that the xiv INTRODUCTION. series is less complete than it would have been, if several of the brethren to whom application was made, and all of whom approved the plan proposed, had not found it incom- patible with their health, or with previous engagements, to contribute their aid. But notwithstanding every deficiency, there are still so many cardinal points of doctrinal and practical theology discussed in this volume, and in a manner so clear and im- pressive, that it is confidently believed that every candid and attentive reader will receive sensible benefit from its perusal — the well informed, by the revival in their minds of a distinct view of truths which have long been most precious in their estimation; and those who need instruction and the removal of doubts and difficulties, by finding the infor- mation, explanations and illustrations, which their circum- stances require. The method of communicating instruction and defend- ing truth, by courses of lectures professedly prepared and delivered for the purpose, is well known not to be novel. In the country from which we derive our origin, lectures of this character have long been in use; and in our own coun- try there have been a few instances, in which something of the same kind has heretofore been attempted. That they will hereafter be frequent, is not improbable; as this mode of conveying to the public the opinions and rea- sonings of men of learning, piety and talents, is recom- mended by many considerations. The preparation of a INTRODUCTION. XV single discourse is not onerous; and when but one is de- manded, and its occasion and connexion are considered, it is not likely to be a hasty or careless production; and the concentration of the talents of able men, each discussing an important point in a single lecture, may be expected to prepare for the public volumes of much value. The Lime Street and Bury Street Lectures, contain some of the most able, useful, and pious disquisitions of the English dissent- ing divines. The Spruce Street Lectures accord entirely in doctrine and spirit with those admirable discourses; and without claiming to equal them, it is humbly hoped that the same blessing from the Spirit of grace and truth, which is known to have attended the former, may also be vouchsafed lo the latter. PRIHCETOIT y I SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. LECTURE I. Delivered on the Evening of the 2d November, 1831, hy the Rev. Ezra Fisk, D.D. of Goshen, N. Y. THE INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. " No man can come unto me, except the Father, which hath sent me, draw him." — John vi. 44. It has pleased God to reveal, not only his existence but his personality, in Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. In the glorious economy of redemption, the Father sends the Son, and the Holy Ghost proceeds from both the Father and the Son. The agency of the Holy Spirit is ascribed to both, sometimes to one person and sometimes to the other. When Christ said, "I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me," he ascribed the influence of the Spirit to the Son: in my text, he tells us, the Father draws by the same agency. On this fundamental doctrine of the Holy Spirit's official influence, executing the commission of the Father and the Son, rests the propriety of ascribing his agency to either or both. The recognition of this doctrine seemed necessary, to understand definitely the meaning of the exception in 2 10 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. my text. I consider it as referring to the agency of the Holy Ghost, in bringing men to Christ. With this influ- ence, men can come and do come to him ; without it, they do not and cannot come. This is the plain and only mean- ing of the passage. With the agency intended in the ex- ception, men are capable of doing all that God requires of them. Leave out the exception, and modify the decla- tion so as to include the agency, it would read thus, "every man can come unto me, if the Father, who hath sent me, draw him." This is a precious and encouraging truth to all who preach the gospel of Christ. The whole economy of grace illustrates this great fact; all Christian experience proves it; and the great day will reveal its glory in the redeemed millions, brought home to Christ in heaven. But leaving out this agency, the whole is reversed — man is only taught his helplessness and made to feel his misery. The declaration in our text, as it fell from the lips of Jesus Christ, expresses an important fact, which should be well understood. Before I proceed to consider the inability asserted, which is the principal object of this discussion, there is an important inquiry to be answered: — What is coming to Christ? I answer the question, and discuss the assertion. I. The question is of great importance, and the illustra- tion of its answer might profitably occupy the whole of this hour. But it admits of a brief solution, which is all that is necessary for my present discussion. Coming to Christ, in these days, is altogether a mental process. In the days of our Saviour's pilgrimage in the flesh, some might have understood it otherwise. When he tra- INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. H versed the regions of Palestine, the people flocked to the places of his instruction, and, doubtless, many thought of nothing else. On the mountain, in the plain, by the sea side, and in the wilderness, he stood before them in tangi- ble human form. Their eyes saw him, and looked on his miracles; their ears heard the gracious words as they pro- ceeded from his lips. But since his bodily presence is withdrawn and enthroned in glory, he is to be approached by us only in mind. Mind alone can now penetrate the heavens, and contemplate the Saviour where the beloved and exiled disciple saw him, exalted in purity and splen- dour, with the rainbow of Jehovah's merciful covenant reflecting his delightful radiance. We recognize, it is true, the grand and glorious principle of his spiritual divine existence, one attribute of which is his omnipresence : and we know, that in reference to this attribute, "he is not far from every one of us." But we speak of a moral approach to Christ, as the Redeemer and Saviour. A brief sketch of this mental process may be comprised in spiritual apprehension, gracious feeling, and holy action. Nothing is more certain than the fact, that the pure, spiritual, holy and gracious character of Jesus Christ, as the only and all-sufficient Saviour, is not apprehended at all, or misapprehended, by men who are "far from him." Coming to Christ, must include some apprehension of his character as found in the gospel, of his divine existence and glory, of his holiness and compassion, of his grace and love- liness, and of his suitedness to the case of lost sinners. In this spiritual apprehension is included faith in his offices of prophet, priest and king, in his atoning sacrifice and inter- cession ; at least, so much of faith is included as belongs 12 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. to the exercise of intellect. I am aware that something; more than a mere apprehension of character, or accrediting a matter of testimony, is included in that faith which the gospel demands. There is a reliance upon the merits of the Redeemer's sacrifice, an affection of the soul, resting on the loveliness which is spiritually apprehended ; but in the intellectual exercise there is a spiritual discernment, which the unbeliever has not, and which fallen spirits, who tremble before the majesty of the Son of God, never pos- sess. It is a discernment of the excellence, glory and loveliness of Christ, and an appropriation of his rich and gracious promises to the soul. There may be degrees of clearness and strength in this spiritual apprehension, but , pC the characteristics are essential. They dijydejts nature, by which, rather than the degree, the estimation is to be made. Gracious affection is an essential part of the mental process, in coming to Christ. Penitence, humility, grati- tude, love, and faith, are connected with that spiritual appre- hension just named. These are feelings of the heart, with- out which there can be no Christian grace. Sorrow for sin, hatred of its intrinsic loathsomeness and opposition to God, humility under a sense of unworthiness, and forsaking the servitude of Satan, are indispensable, in a sinner's approach to Christ. Gratitude for such a Saviour and such a privilege, must be called into exercise in this transaction. But love to Christ is the most direct and important exercise in the process. It is love by which faith works; in fact, it is an essential part of that faith which relies on the great atoning sacrifice, and unites the soul to Jesus Christ. By holy action, I mean, not only a living exercise of gracious affections, but a subjection of the will to the obe- dience of Christ. I mean directing all the faculties of the INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 13 mind in the service of him "who gave himself for us, and called us with an holy calling:" I speak now of mental, not external action, profession, or observance of religious duties. These all have their importance in their proper place, but they are the result of coming to Christ, and necessary evi- dences of the fact. The man who spiritually apprehends, trusts, and loves Christ, comes to him, and none others come. All this is often expressed in the gospel by a single comprehensive term, faith, love. Sometimes faith ex- presses the whole transaction; it <'is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." Sometimes love is used in the same comprehensive sense — "love is the fulfilling of the law." The reasons why these graces are used for the whole process, are very obvious, because faith and love are so prominent and vital in the transaction; and because either of these graces implies the whole. It may, perhaps, be asked, whether the "coming to Christ," mentioned in the text, intend union to him, or merely an approach, to ask some blessing ? To this, I answer, the former, beyond peradventure. It is coming to him for sal- vation — into covenant union with him, perpetual in its glo- rious results. But while the text is thus interpreted, the exercise of these graces should be cultivated in all ap- proaches to Jesus Christ. II. The assertion of the text, that without the agency of the Holy Spirit no man can come to Christ, demands care- ful attention. Taking the obvious scriptural interpretation of this coming, and its form may be thus stated: without the Spirit's agency, no man can love Christ, or believe on him. I am aware that this doctrine is denied, and the whole agency of the Holy Ghost rejected. His divine existence is 14 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. also denied, and the doctrine is propagated that man needs no aid to his reason, except what instruction he gains from nature and some moral maxims found in what we call reve- lation, to love God and fulfil all the obligations of his being. But this doctrine I need not refute. It necessarily includes a denial of God's plain declarations, and sets aside the whole gospel of Christ. Few in this land, it is to be hoped, have the hardihood unequivocally to espouse an opinion so di- rectly in the face of divine revelation. But there is much speculation on the inability intended in this declaration of Jesus Christj and there is certainly great importance attached to the inquiry into its meaning. The importance, however, arises not so much from any inherent difficulty in the investigation, or any liability of an honest mind to err, in the interpretation of the text, or in its practical application, but from the multiplied speculations and bad philosophy of the age. It is undeniably true that no man ever did come to Christ without the agency of the Holy Spirit; no believer of the gospel can suppose that any man ever will come without it ; and the Saviour asserted that none can come, except by this agency. What more is necessary then, to admit that the inability is entire, a complete preventive? Apart from the meddlesome philosophy which has in- truded its blindness to obscure the light, I perceive only one reason for pursuing the inquiry another step. That is, to show the consistency of this announcement with God's commands, which bind us to love him and believe on Christ. On this subject, the facts, as stated in the Scriptures, are entirely satisfactory to my mind. There can be no doubt that God's commands are peremptory and binding on all individuals of the human family, to whom the word of his INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 15 revelation is sent. Nor can there be any doubt that men are unable to come without the agency of the Holy Ghost. Here are two facts, revealed with equal plainness, and each positively asserted. Are they consistent with each other? This is the question. If they are not, there is inconsistency and inequality with God, because he has asserted both, and applied them to the same persons. We come, therefore, to this examination, with the assurance of their entire con- sistency in fact; and if we cannot perceive it, we may be certain the defect is in us, and not in the divine administra- tion. It is a case in which we are not at liberty to hold to one and reject the other. Both are facts, and must be consistent. Whether such commands would have been given to us if there had been no mission of the Holy Spirit, perhaps we are not competent to say; but we know that they are not given without it. I speak not now of the providential agency which God exercises over and in his creatures, but of that mission of the Spirit whose object is, by an unseen influence, to "reprove the world of sin, and of righteous- ness, and of judgment," to take of the things of Christ, and show them unto his people. This influence constitutes an essential part of God's administration, and he is ever ready to "give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him." The character and efiect of this inability to come to Christ, is a proper subject of inquiry, and should, in these days, be well understood. The subject embraces much, and can only receive a brief examination at this time. Here let me say, that the circumstances under which I address you, and the occasion, together with the false phi- losophy so often mingled in the discussion of this subject, must be my apology for detaining you with a philosophical 16 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. investigation. Some apology seems necessary, for I have not forgotten the Apostle Paul's caution to "avoid opposi- tions of science falsely so called." But since this subject has been so involved, I may be permitted to recollect ano- ther caution by the same Apostle: "beware, lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit." I hope to regard these cautions, and show how philosophy has obscur- ed this subject. The terms which indicate power, are used more vaguely and more variously than almost any others in the English language. The reason is obvious. We know not what is power. No man has ever defined it. We know how we get the idea, but the thing itself is beyond our cognizance. We perceive the relation between cause and effect, and call that power which constitutes this relation. What it is, we do not know, and it is useless to attempt its definition. But if we take that relation which suggests the idea of power, in the place of its definition, we shall not err in any of its important applications or uses. The relation between voli- tion and the effect which follows, may be used for a defini- tion of man's power. Yet the will is not power, nor is volition ability, nor is the effect power, nor is it true that the connexion is ability; but that on which the connexion rests is precisely what we call power. Nothing else can be properly so called, which belongs to man. Now if we substitute this connexion for that which constitutes it, I can see no error in any of its applications in argument or illustration. Perhaps some may be disposed to ask here, why I would substitute any definition for ability, which, in itself, is unde- finable? I answer, because it is desirable to divest it of the perplexity and vagueness to which usage and speculation INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 17 have subjected the term. This is reason sufficient. To illustrate my meaning, take the case before us, coming to Christ. Is there a connexion between volition and spi- ritual discernment — between volition and love — or be- tween volition and the appropriate holy exercise of all the mind's faculties? If there be such a connexion as between cause and effect, a dependence of this discernment and love on volition, then, certainly, men have the power of coming to Christ, without the agency of the Holy Ghost; and there is no addition of ability in the conferring of divine grace. If there be no such connexion, men have not the power. But here it will be said by some, that this description of ability is of that which is physical or natural. Be it so; it is asserted by many that men have natural power, but lack moral ability, to obey the command — "come to Christ." What is moral ability? Is it not that which connects moral effects with volition? Is volition a moral act? — whether it is so or not, love to God is a moral act. And if the latter be the effect of the former, that which so connects them is moral power. Call it physical, natural, or moral — let it be remembered — it is all the same; that which connects the event with volition, is ability, and nothing else can be pro- perly so called. I know there are other notions of power, which will presently be examined; but let not this view be yet forgotten. Now, if men have this ability of any kind — I care not what it may be called — without the draw- ing of the Father, to come to Christ, or to love God, it must have been ascertained by the fact having, at some time, taken place. No other evidence can be admissible, in opposition to the positive declarations of Jesus Christ. Show me such a fact, and I will admit the ability in that case. But such a fact has never occurred, and is utterly impossible. 3 18 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. If Christ had said, it is impossible for any man to come unto me, except the Father who hath sent me draw him, it would not have varied the meaning of the text. What, then, becomes of the distinction between natural and moral ability and inability? It is set aside as useless, so far as its application to this case Is concerned. Ability always indicates a connexion between cause and effect; and if I have not greatly mistaken the meaning of those who contend for man's natural ability to love God, they consider it as something which is connected with volition, or that belongs to the will . They represent the whole process of coming to Christ as depending on a man's choice ; and this is because men have natural power to come, if they choose. — Whenever they choose to exert that power, they come. All that is necessary, therefore, is, that they should be induced to choose to love God, and then they will actually love him. Now if all this were true, it would indeed be a fact, that men have natural power to love God. But is it so? Let us examine the case. The volition does not govern the understanding. It does not depend upon a man's will whether he discern spiritual things, or whether his intellect possess spiritual illumination. I think the mere statement of this fact, is sufficient. "The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him; neither can he know them, be- cause they are spiritually discerned." The volition moreover does not govern the heart. It does not depend upon a man's will, whether he love God or hate him; "because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." The truth is, by an irreversible law of mental ope- rations, the will is governed by the affections, and they INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 19 must be changed, before there can be any love to God. If it were so that the affections followed and depended on voli- tion, every sinner, alarmed at the prospect of the everlast- ing wrath which awaits him, and accrediting the fact that love to Christ would deliver him from going down to the pit, would certainly love him. On this supposition, there could be no danger of self-deception; no need of so much anxiety among Christians to know their state; no need of a warfare with the lusts of the flesh; no danger of being brought into captivity to the law of sin which is in their members. It cannot be true, that the will governs the affections. I can just as easily conceive that a man's volitions may govern his appetite for food, as his taste for moral truth. A sick man might as well transform, by the influence of volition, his aversion to a medicine which he chooses to take, as the sinner change, by the same influence, his aversion to holi- ness: — both are impossible. If natural ability, therefore, be indicated by a connexion between volition, or will, as the cause, and loving God as the effect, men have not natural power to love God. But some use the phrase natural ability, to indicate merely the possession of faculties, which, rightly employed, do love God, and perform Christian duty. That men have faculties which constitute them free, moral, and responsi- ble agents, is true, and of great importance to be recollected. As I am not disposed to contend for words, I will examine this meaning of ability. The understanding perceives; it is proper, therefore, in this sense, to say, that it, or man, has ability to perceive. But has it the ability of spiritual discernment, without divine illumination? Certainly not. The heart loves; in the same sense it is proper to say, the heart has ability to love. But has it ability to love holi- 20 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. ness? Nay, it is enmity against God, and cannot be sub- ject to the law of God, which enjoins holy love. The will chooses; it, therefore, has ability to choose. But here are two questions to be answered — has the will ability to choose independently ? — and can the choice control the affections of the heart? To the first question, I answer, that man's will has no self-determihing power, but is always governed by the pleasure of the heart; that is, by the prevailing affection. This is a principle so well settled in mental philosophy, that I consider it unnecessary, at tliis time, to investigate the proof. Although the will cannot act independently, it may choose subordinately, and ultimately. The ultimate choice always terminates on the object most agreeable to the heart. A subordinate choice terminates on some object, not always for its own sake, or because it is in itself agreeable, but for the sake of something with which it is connected that is agreeable. Now, I conceive that an awakened sinner may have such a sense of his danger, and be so fully convinced that away from the Saviour he must perish, that he may really choose to" come to Christ for the sake of escaping hell; not because he discerns any beauty in Christ, or has any love to him. He may choose subordinately, as the sick man chooses medicine, for the sake of his health. This is not only conceivable, but is matter of frequent occurrence. It is, obviously, the usual course with sinners, when they begin to seek the Lord. You cannot convince them that they do not choose to come to Christ; you may convince them that their choice is of no avail while the heart does not love him; but their own consciousness of choice is paramount to all argument. Tell them that it INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 21 depends on their choice, and that if they chose to come, they certainly would do it; they will say, as in such cases many have said, it seems to us we do choose to come, but we know that we have not come; and we suppose therefore we do not choose it, because those who have a right to know tell us it depends on our choice. Such is generally the case with not a few, who are taught to believe that coming to Christ depends on their own will. Man's own consciousness, in such a case, is more likely to accord with fact, than are the inferences from speculative theories. If the will can thus choose subordinately, the second question — can the choice control the affection? — is easily answered in the negative. It is perfectly evident that the highest affection is placed on the ultimate object, which, ih the case just now mentioned, is safety from impending wrath; coming to Christ is, therefore, chosen subordinately, and has no tendency to change the affection. It should here be observed, that the Spirit of God often convinces men of their sin and danger, and the necessity of loving- Christ, long before they do love him. _With these thoughts distinctly before his mind, the awakened sinner tries the process of subjecting his heart to his will, for days, or even weeks, before he learns that he must despair of accomplish- ing the object, and must rely on the Spirit's influence. The more he tries to love God in this way, the more hard his heart seems, and the farther he goes from the object which he seeks. The truth must be realized, "it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy." Let me here state, briefly, the doctrine of the will's government and freedom, in accordance, as I conceive, with the Scriptures and with fact. The will always obeys the 22 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. pleasure of the heart, and in this consists both its govern- ment and freedom. To present the whole operation in its philosophical form, it is thus — the heart, or faculty which feels, is the spring or source of action — the ultimate object is the excitement to action — and pleasure is the motive which the will always obeys. Thus, the choice of the will is entirely governed by the pleasure of the heart; and this is the highest kind of freedom conceivable. Can the will be more free than to choose as is most agreeable? Can any man desire any other liberty of will than to choose just as he pleases? If he had liberty to choose what is disagreea- ble, he never would use it. Such choosing could not be freedom, except in cases already referred to, where disa- greeable objects are chosen subordinately for the sake of the ultimate, which is always agreeable. We have heard of a dogma which teaches, that men may choose to be damned for the glory of God, from which, although it be most lovely in itself, they expect no enjoy- ment, nor to see any loveliness. This, verily, looks like another kind of freedom — choosing without any motive except pain. But this figment of the last century is gene- rally laid aside, and disowned by those who are willing to bear the name of its author. It is well that so monstrous an absurdity should die; and it would be still better, if the two remaining absurdities, which constituted the peculiari- ties of the system to which it belonged, were as generally exploded. One of these dogmas I have occasion to examine in a single aspect, viz. that all holiness and sin consist, exclusively^ in free voluntary exercises. The other, which is, God's efficiency in producing sin, although it belongs to the same philosophical speculation, fulls not immediately within the range of my subject. INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 23 Since, according to this dogma, all holiness and sin con- sist exclusively in voluntary exercise, all the moral excel- lence included in coming to Christ is volition only: and since the will is not governed by any good or evil principle, it is just as easy to choose right as wrong; men, therefore, have as much power to love God as to hate him. It is furthermore inferred, that regeneration is only a new and right choice, which all men are naturally able to exercise. This, I believe, is a fair representation of the doctrine. Now, if this were true, I would think it a waste of time and breath to pray for the Holy Spirit's influence to renew and sanctify men. But is it true? I admit that volitions are sinful; but I maintain that feelings are sinful, and that the principle or propensity from which they proceed is also sinful. "Out of the heart (not volition) proceed evil thoughts." I am aware, however, that some use, though inaccurately, voluntary exercises to include all the feelings of the heart. On that principle, I ask, what feels — what chooses — has it no character? I ask for the appositeness of many of our Lord's parables, such as of the tree, leaven, and mustard seed. What connects the exercises with the man? What is punishable? But I cannot pursue the many absurdities to which the principle leads. The way is now prepared to examine the real character of that inability which keeps the sinner away from Christ. It is sin. It is not want of faculties, which are capable, under the Holy Spirit's influence, of all that is implied in coming to Christ, but without that influence, men cannot so employ them. The inability is recognized in three aspects — blindness of the understanding — hardness of the heart — ■ and perversion of the will. These qualities are again expressed, by ignorance, deadness, and obstinacy. Is it 24 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. right to call this sin, moral inability? Or shall it be called natural inability? The truth is, the whole use of this dis- tinctive phraseology is out of place, and worse than useless, in the explanation of this subject. Men are depraved in the heart, that seat of the affection and source of action; and this is evinced by blindness and perverseness. . However we may describe this depravity, and whatever we may call it, this is the only impediment in the way of sinners coming to Christ. In order that any man should love God, repent of sin, believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, or what includes them all, come to Christ, his heart must be regenerated. There must be a new propensity or preparation of heart to love holiness and hate sin, and the understanding must be enlightened to discern the spiritual excellence and loveli- ness of Christ. The impenitent man has neither of these; and without them, coming to Christ is impossible. Should it here be said that the development and propensity is com- ing to Christ, and that the inquiry respects the fact, whe- ther he has or has not the ability for their production and exercise; and what is the nature of that ability or inability — I answer in several particulars. It is admitted on all hands, that the impenitent sinner has not this discernment or pro- pensity ;■ he cannot, therefore, develope what he has not. That he has not power to enligliten his own understanding, or to originate a propensity to love holiness, I have already shown. As. to the character of tliat inability, I have already said it consists in a jnnnciple of sin, affecting all the mental faculties, and having its primary seat in the heart. Now, what the nature of that inability is which ren- ders man incapable of regenerating his own heart — for the whole inquiry may concentrate here — it matters very little INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 25 to define. Let us examine more carefully the philosophi- cal definitions of the day. If we call \i physical, it is phi- losophically true; but is an improper use of the term, therefore calculated to mislead. Physical ability, though ever so great, could not produce the moral change called regeneration. If a sinner had ten times as much physical power as a fallen angel, it would be just as impossible as it is now for him to renew his heart. Physical power never originates moral results in responsible agents. All their physical ability is employed for physical purposes, except as it is used instrumentally, by the governing principle of the heart. The principle which moves and controls all physical action, is to be the subject of change. It cannot be changed by that which only acts under its direction and control. Thus, the truth of the assertion is evident; but such are the associations and uses of the term physical, that it is improper to employ it here, and is calculated to mis- lead. The more common and familiar uses of the phrase- ology, connects it with volition and external action. Thus, a man chooses to walk, and the effect follows; but his limbs become palsied, and then he is physically unable to walk. A child cannot perform the operations of a man. But illustrations need not be multiplied; they are familiar to all. Such want of power is evidently excusable; and from this fixed and warrantable use of the phrase, if we say sin- ners are physically unable to love God, it is liable to mis- lead them to the inference that they are excusable. If we call any thing else, except that which connects the effect with volition, physical power, it makes confusion, and obscures the subject to which it is applied. If we call it natural inability, the terms are liable to a similar abuse. It is nevertheless true, that man's inability 4 26 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. is by nature, because it is his depravity which the Scrip- tures represent to be natural to him. But if we use natural^ in distinction from morale it means the same as physical, and ought not to be employed in theological dis- cussions of this kind. If, however, natural inability mean a want of the requisite faculties to constitute man a respon- sible agent, it is not true that men are naturally unable to love God. They do possess all the requisite faculties; but very few men have so disciplined their minds to technical distinctions and theorising, as to carry along with the terms and their use this meaning. It ought not, for these reasons, to be used. In its technical and differently ex- plained meanings, it is true, or it is false; but in its common appropriate meaning and use, it is altogether inapplicable to this case. Now, if we say it is moral inability, the terms are quite as objectionable as the former. If I understand the term moral, it indicates something which is either holy or sin- ful, right or wrong. The inquiry should, therefore, be made in this place, what belongs to man of a moral nature, and why is it moral? Any thing which belongs to man, that is either sinful or holy, is moral, and nothing else, whether it be faculty, principle, or conduct. I would say the primary seat and source of all that is moral belonging to man, is in his heart. What, then, is moral power to love God? Several answers are given to this inquiry, besides the one which I have before given. Take one that some use, it is a heart prepared to love God and holi- ness; sinners have not this. But take another meaning, the possession of a faculty or faculties which are moral; and sinners surely have moral power to love God. I am unable to perceive why it is not just as proper to say that they INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 27 have mora], as natural ability, to change their hearts. It is said, in one case, if men have not natural faculties or power, they cannot be obliged to keep God's law — so it may, with equal propriety, be said, if men have not a moral faculty or power, they cannot be obliged to obey the moral statute. But I am aware, that moral ability is often under- stood to mean willingness; and great wisdom is affected in using the distinctive terms in question. On this supposi- tion, I ask, why that, which, in the estimation of those who use the distinction, is considered the essence of obe- dience, should be called power of any kind, and in any sense? No good reason can be given. The truth seems to me, that those men who use the distinction of natural and moral in explaining the inability of sinners, are deceived, by transferring an association which belongs to external actions, and is true where it belongs, to mental affections, where it is not true; a transfer which will, therefore, always mislead. It will now be asked, how can a sinner be blamed for not loving God? The answer to this question, will lead to a more definite view of the inability under discussion. Men are to blame for nothing except sin, and for tiiat always. Now, whether sin be in action or principle, in the temper of the heart or in volition, it is the object of God's displeasure, and for it men arc criminal. It is a specimen of the bad philosophy which is becoming prevalent in this age, that no being can act wrong unless he has ability to do right; and none can act right, unless he has ability to do wrong; all this is applied to mental operations as well as to external actions. But is not God always right and good, although he cannot err? Is not Satan sinful and blameable, although he cannot love holiness? Certainly. But if this principle may not 28 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. be applied to men, will not the guilt of the damned be greatly diminished, the moment they are placed beyond the impassable gulf? Are those of whom the prophet speaks, less criminal than others, because their habits of sin are as difficult to change as the Ethiopian's skin, and fixed as the leopard's spot ? Are those comparatively innocent of whom the Apostle declares, " it is impossible to renew them again to repentance?" The true account of the case is, the source of all human agency and ability is sinful, and must be changed by divine grace, or God will forever hate it, and punish men for its character and agency. Is it asked, how man can be blamed for sin, if he has not power to change that principle from which all his criminal agency proceeds? If I understand this question, it is precisely of the character of one pro- posed to Paul, '< why doth he [God] yet find fault? for who hath resisted his will?" Although connected with the subject in a different aspect, it is the same inquiry. I might give the Apostle's rebuke with great propriety, "nay, but, man, who art thou that repliest against God?" Here it would be proper to leave the inquiry, were it not that modern philosophy laughs at all authority, though it be divine, by which a question is settled without explana- tion. Let it be remembered then, that it is not the province of philosophy to explain how God's law reaches the heart and binds, but every man's conscience can testify the fact, and reproach him for his malice. If the question be, how man became thus sinful? let those who ask it, read the history of man's fall, in the third chapter of the book of Genesis, and Paul's account of the covenant relation and imputation, in his epistles to the Romans and Corinthians, for a solution of this question; and there we leave the inquirers. INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 29 Take another method of solving the difficulty. God has constituted his own perfections, which are holy, the stand- ard of right and moral obligation. Every intelligent, free, responsible agent, tried by this standard, and found opposed to it, is an enemy of God. The rule shows him to be such, no matter what his power. His power is not estimated by this standard, but simply his moral character. Ability is not the basis or measure of responsibility in this case, but the faculties which constitute man a free, moral agent. I repeat again, to prevent all mistake, that I am now speak- ing of obligation to love God, not of external actions, where physical or natural power is employed, and for which a man is responsible, according to that which he has, and not according to that he has not. Man does not love God with his physical ability. He is responsible to God for the exercise of all his faculties; if they are wrongly employed, it proves the source of action is wrong; and the more depraved is that source of human agency, the worse is the character — the more criminal. I recur now to the question, whether this doctrine is con- sistent with God's commands — or, in more explicit terms, has God a right to command men to love him, if they have not the ability to obey? I answer yes, most undoubtedly. Be it remembered that this refers not to external conduct, where physical power is employed, and concerning which it would not be true. A man who has no hand or foot cannot be rightfully commanded to use them. An idiot cannot be rightfully ordered to solve a mathematical pro- blem, or an infant to calculate an eclipse. But what has all such ability to do with loving God? I speak now of God's command over the heart, and man's inability by nature to turn the affections to God. Let me here repeat, that 30 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. God does command men to love him, and at the same time says they cannot love him. Moreover it is right; because the only impediment in the way of their obedience is that sinful principle, which God condemns, and for which he will punish men. This fact and this reason of the righte- ousness in the command, show the character of the inability to be sin. Further we need not speculate. The great question now recurs, what saith the Holy Ghost? After all the speculations on this subject, to ex- plain its philosophy, the simple and very plain language of the Holy Scriptures is incomparably more satisfactory than all that philosophy ever can teach. Love to God is a fruit of the Spirit, so are all the Christian graces. "The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long suffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance." Salvation is all of grace, in its plan, developement and completion, "not of works — for we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works." Regeneration is by the agency of the Holy Spirit — "according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost — born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God — born from above — trans- formed by renewing of the mind." Christians are thus challenged — "who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive?" Christ said to his disciples, "without me ye can do nothing." Said the Apostle, "not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God." What language, plain or figurative, could more explicitly declare man's inability without the Holy Spirit, than the Scriptures use again and again? It is twice stated in the chapter of my text — Elsewhere sinners are repre- SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. 31 sented as "alienated from the life of God"— having a ''car- nal mind,", which -'is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be" — under the power of Satan — and of sin — dead in trespasses and sins — their hearts fully set in them to do evil." Man's deliverance from this spiritual death and servitude to sin and Satan, ''is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy." But quotations need not be further continued. Take all those very numer- ous passages of Scripture which ascribe to the Holy Spirit, as his fruits, the graces of piety — all those which ascribe regeneration to the same agency — all those which represent this change as a new creation — all those which represent the character and state of fallen men as dead in sin, under its dominion, lost, blind, enemies to God and helpless — all those prophecies, in which the figures of dry bones, steril- ity and the curse, are found — all those records of history, which describe the progress of the gospel and the conver- sion of men to God — and all those supplications, directions, facts, and promises, which indicate a reliance on Christ and the Holy Spirit for sanctification and salvation : then tell me if there can remain a doubt of man's inability and crime. What now are the uses to be made of this doctrine ? One very important use is to humble man before God. If men are so sinful that they cannot deliver themselves, either from its curse or from its dominion, they have reason to be humble. They have reason to be humbled under a sense of their sinfulness and their impotence. There are few things of which men are more inclined to be proud than of power. Children early discover a disposition to glory in their strength, or their capacity to accomplish what they 32 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. consider important. Men are naturally fond of power in all its relations and influence, and are prone to become vain in their imaginations, forgetting their sin and weakness before God. But when once they are taught this doctrine by the Holy Spirit, they are prostrated in the dust, and feel themselves at the disposal of sovereign mercy. The pride of man needs to be humbled for his own benefit ; and God will have sinners humbled, that his own power may be manifested in them. " Whoso exalteth himself shall • be abased." Another use of the doctrine is to convince men of sin. So long as sinners perceive no danger, and feel confident in their ability to turn themselves to God at any time, they will not listen to the invitations of mercy, or care for the representations of their danger. No sinner will be likely to feel much anxiety for the salvation of his soul, while he considers it as depending on his own choice or ability. There is no truth, which the Holy Ghost more frequently and efficiently uses, to convince men of their sin and dan- ger, than their lost, helpless condition by nature. The publican felt this when he cried, " God be merciful to me a sinner. " So fully does the Spirit convince men of their helplessness, when he draws them to Christ, that their cry is, "Lord save, or we perish;" and ever after they live and walk by faith, looking to Christ, in whom is their strength, and depending on the Holy Spirit for guidance. The Spirit often teaches sinners their danger before he teaches them their helplessness ; they look more at the sin of their conduct than the sin of their hearts. In such cases they commence an effort to make themselves better. They try expedient after expedient, confident that they can turn themselves to God. But under the teaching of the Spirit INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 33 they learn that they make themselves worse instead of bet- ter. Let a sinner perceive that he deserves endless misery and is in imminent danger of his soul— if he has, or think he has power, he will make exertion for his safety. But let him perceive that he is ready to sink into everlasting perdi- tion, and feel that his sin renders him helpless, an agony of distress will fill his soul; and if Christ had not sent the Holy Spirit, despair would drink up his own spirit. Then he trusts in Christ, and is thus drawn by the blessed agency of the Holy Ghost. But here it may possibly be asked, if this doctrine be not calculated to discourage sinners from seeking the Lord ? I suppose it is possible for cavillers to pervert the truth, and even wrest it to their own destruction; but that it is calcu- lated to discourage men from trusting in Christ and accept- ing salvation, as it is freely offered to them, I cannot admit. I know that some have said the doctrine is calculated to lead men to sit down quietly and wait God's time to eave them, alleging, that if he do not save them, the fault will be in the Saviour, and not in themselves. This cavil never came from a sinner, deeply anxious for his soul's salvation. But if the objection were founded in fact, the influence would not be to quiet the feelings. Suppose a case, which, I think, may illustrate the influence of the sentiments in- tended in the objection. Were it announced to us, that the flames are encroaching upon this house, and that if we re- main in it a few moments longer we must inevitably be consumed, and that we are unable to get out of the house : would we lie down and sleep ? No, every bosom would be filled with wakeful agony. But to make the case some- what parallel to the real situation of the sinner, we must suppose two things more — that our sinfulness alone disables 5 34 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. us from escaping, and that God is entreating us to accept his efficient and certain relief. Then if we should perish in the flame to night, would there not be crime as well as helplessness in our case ? Would there not be a striking analogy in the feeling, likely to be excited in such a case, to the conviction of sinners taught of God ? To my mind the analogy is easily traced. It is again objected that this doctrine sets aside the use of means with impenitent sinners. To this I reply, in un- qualified terms, that exactly the reverse is true. If the excellency of the power were of men, every thing would be confused, uncertain, and discouragiog. But since it is of God, and not of men, we may hope for success, relying on his ability, which is1;rict accordance with the suggestions of In- spiration. If they be not, they ought to be thrown aside, or corrected. But whilst the Confession of Faith retains its authority, no member of our community is permitted to appeal from its decision. It is the proper and immediate criterion of truth and error, in the Presbyterian Church. No man has a right to complain, if he be judged by the law under which he has placed himself. If he become dis- satisfied with it, he is at perfect liberty to withdraw beyond the reach of its jurisdiction. We must pronounce that to be truth which accords with our standards, and that to be error which contradicts them. The most consummate address has always been em- ployed by the advocates of error, to cover their advance, and to screen themselves from deserved rebuke. At one time, you will find them attempting to bring for- ward their new divinity, during the heat and tumult of a religious awakening; at another time, they are seen 138 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. labouring to recommend it, by subtle argument and meta- physical reasoning. If one of these men be called to an ac- count for his heretical opinions, he is found ready to de- fend himself with a world of explanations. He positively asserts, that he differs from you only in words, or in points not essential. He declares that he believes the same doc- trines which otliers believe, and that he differs only in his explanation of them: although it is evident, that what he calls his explanation, is a flat contradiction of the doctrine. Much is heard of the spirit and improvements of the age, of new light, and more liberal ideas in religion; of the importance of being divested of prejudice and a servile dependence upon authority. It is enough to excite our amazement, if not our indignation, to see a youth whose attention has been directed to religious subjects only a few years, perhaps months, undertaking to depreciate the at- tainments of the Church in all former times; and to set himself in advance of the most learned and able divines which the world has ever known. But surely to talk about the improvements of the age, will not cover the arrogance and absurdity of such pretensions. Improvements of the age ! Improvements in divinity! Has any new revelation been received from heaven? Can any important truth be named, to which the Church, in former ages, has been a stranger? Nothing of the kind. In what, then, consist the boasted im- provements in divinity, of which we hear so much? I an- swer, in the revival of old and exploded errors, upon which the Church has long since, and repeatedly, placed the mark of reprobation. Our modern discoveries are derived, not from the lively oracles, but from the graves of Pelagius, Socinus, and other heretics. In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, we call upon all OF CHURCH DISCIPLINE. jgg the members of our Church, deeply and solemnly to con- sider the present state of things among us. At no time in the history of our community, has the aspect of affliirs ap- peared so dark and appalling. The tide of delusion and innovation has been advancing upon vis with portentous im- petuosity, threatening to sweep away all that we venerate as excellent, and lovely, and scriptural, in our doctrines and institutions. We beseech every Presbyterian, therefore, to awake to the dangers which threaten the purity, the peace, and the highest welfare of our denomination; and to repel every attempt which may be made, to set aside,, or mutilate, the genuine and approved system which we at present enjoy. We ought to, and I hope we do, love and revere the establish- ed principles of our standards. We know that under their influence, our society has greatly prospered; and it should be our ardent wish, that they may be transmitted unimpaired to our children. How then can any be unconcerned, whilst many among us are labouring to bring them into disrepute, and to substitute another, and, in many essential respects, an opposite system, in their place? We entreat you, then, for your own sakes, for the sake of your children, for the regard you have for the honour of Christ, the advancement of truth, and the prosperity of the Church, tobewareof giving encour- agement, in any way, to the promulgation of notions unknown to our orthodox and scriptural Confession of Faith. The indignant rebukes of the churches, ought to meet every at- tempt to introduce another Gospel, in the place of that which you have learned from the revelation of Jesus Christ. We call upon the ruling elders, the guardians of the pu- rity and welfare of our churches, duly to reflect upon the high obligations which devolve upon them at this eventful juncture. Beloved brethren, it is your province and duty 140 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. to see that the people under your care be instructed in the pure doctrines of the word of God, and that the acknow- ledged prhiciples of our Church be respected and maintain- ed. It belongs to you to prevent, so far as your authority extends, the propagation of a system of opinions unknown to our standards, disowned by the Church of God in all past ages, essentially repugnant to the Holy Scriptures, and de- structive to all true and scriptural religion. Much is expected from your firmness, your soundness in the faith, and your just sense of the duties which belong to your station. We look to you as most likely, under God, to sustain the cause of evangelical truth, and to arrest the tide of novelty and de- lusion, which, for some time past, has been advancing within our limits. Ministers of the everlasting Gospel, we call upon you to exert the authority, which you have received from the Lord Jesus, in defence of the truth, and for the prevention of error, delusion, and discord, in the Churches. To you, especially, it pertains to provide that the people be fed with knowledge and understanding; and to see that the poison of heresy be not administered to them, instead of the bread of life. When men corrupt the Gospel, and distract the Church by their pernicious innovations, you are under ob- ligation to stay the plague, and to restore the body to a sound state, by the use of discipline, the remedy which Di- vine wisdom has appointed. In the discharge of this high obligation, you are required, it is true, to act in the ex- ercise of Christian meekness, forbearance, and kindness: but you must not permit a feeling of tenderness, or a dread of opposition and censure, to deter you from the perform- ance of an indispensable, although an unpleasant duty. You may expect to incur odium, suspicion and reproach. OF CHURCH DISCIPLINE. 141 But, being actuated by a pure regard to the honour and command of God, the glorious truths of the Gospel, and the best interests of the Church, you can well endure them. To the sincerity and uprightness of your intentions, you will have a witness in your own hearts — you will have a witness in heaven. May the great Head of the Church give you light and direction in all things; and enable you, with fidelity and firmness, to stand for God and truth; and to resist the progress of unscriptural novelties, and the en- croachment of mischievous errors. And let us all, my beloved hearers, be assured that we possess a spiritual discernment of the excellence and glory of divine truth; and that the truth has made us free from the predominance of corrupt desires and affections. Unless we have come to Christ, in consequence of our having heard and learned of the Father; unless we are sanctified by the Holy Spirit through the truth, a mere speculative under- standing of the doctrines of religion will not accomplish our salvation. Let us endeavour, by a life and conversation becoming the Gospel, to adorn the doctrine of God our Saviour in all things, that when he shall appear, we may also appear with him in glory. 20 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. LECTURE VI. Delivered on the Evening of the 5th February, 1832, by the Rev. Charles Hodge, of Princeton, N. J. NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. "When we were enemies we were reconciled unto God by the death of his Son." — Rom. v. 10. The truth that man is a moral, and consequently an ac- countable being, is the foundation of all religion. It is necessarily involved in this truth, that our happiness de- pends on the favour of God, and that this favour is forfeit- ed by sin. Just so far, and so clearly, therefore, as men are conscious of sin, are they convinced that they are the objects of the divine displeasure. As the consciousness of sin is universal, so also is the apprehension of God's anger. The question, therefore, forces itself on the attention of every considerate human being, with an energy and impor- tunity which cannot be resisted. How is the favour of God to be regained ? The answer to this question decides the religious character and the destiny of him who gives it. For, if he is mistaken here, if he adopts a wrong method of securing this object, he is, on his own principles, undone. 21 144 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. Here, then, more immediately than any where else, are we in contact with the vital principle of religion. For as there can be no real happiness, so there can be no holiness except in the enjoyment of God's favour, {Born. vi. 14), and con- sequently there can be no true religion where the method of securing his favour, whatever that may be, is denied or neglected. Such being confessedly the importance of this question, it need hardly be remarked, that this of all others is the subject on which mere speculation and theorizing should be forborne. When a man is seeking for himself a footing on which he can stand alone in the presence of his God, or on which he is willing to assume the responsibility of exhorting others to stand, he needs, if ever, the rock of the divine testimony beneath his feet. Happily we are not left in uncertainty on this subject. There is no one doctrine of the Bible more frequently as- serted, more variously implied, more intimately interwoven with all the rest, than that which teaches the method of re- gaining the forfeited favour of God. The declaration is so explicit, and so frequently repeated, that we are reconciled unto God by the death of his Son, that no class of men, professing to recognize the authority of the Scriptures, ven- ture to deny that it is in some way through the death of Christ this result is secured. But the question here arises, what is the nature of this con#e^ion — how is it that the sufferings of the Son of God secure the remission of sins? It must be admitted that therd'is no little diversity of opi- nion as to the answer which should be given to this ques- tion. But why need the question be agitated ? Why not be contented with the general statement, we are saved by the death of Christ, without perplexing ourselves or others by inquiring how these events are related ? We should be NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 145 at a loss for an answer to these interrogations, and feel ready- to admit that all such inquiries are worse than useless, if the Bible was silent on the subject. Did the Scriptures teach us the fact only, that the death of Christ is connected with the pardon of sin, without explaining the nature or mode of that connexion, then indeed'would inquiry on the subject be vain, if not impious. But this is not the case. The manner in which the sufferings of the Redeemer are connected with our salvation, is as much revealed as the object of our faith and ground of our hope, as the fact itself. Besides, this question is most intimately connected with all true piety. If the death of Christ has no other connexion with the remission of sins, than as it confirms his doctrines, then must our views of the divine character, of the ground of a sinner's confidence towards God, of the nature of faith, and mode of salvation, all be changed ; then have we ano- ther Gospel ; and all those exercises of piety, which sup- pose a different view of this subject, are fanatical delusions. We are not, therefore, travelling beyond the limits of re- vealed truth, nor instituting an inquiry unconnected with practical religion, when we ask. How it is that the death of Christ secures the remission of sins ? Various as are the opinions entertained on this subject, they may all, it is be- lieved, be reduced to these three general views. The first is that which represents the death of Christ, not as the immediate or proximate ground of pardon, but as securing this result only so far as it is instrumental in pro- ducing a change of character in the sinner himself. Its tendency to effect this change is ascribed either to the con- firmation which it gives to the Gospel in the general, or to some one truth in particular; to the exhibition which it makes of the divine mercy, or the excellence of the Re- 146 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. deemer ; or to some more mysterious and undefinable influence. The effect, however, in what ever way it may be produced, is on the sinner himself, and it is in virtue of this effect that pardon is secured. According to this view, every constituent idea of the doctrine of Atonement is re- jected, and Christianity is either a modified system of natu- ral religion, or of mystical philosophy. The second general view proceeds on the assumption, that as the end of punishment is the prevention of crime, if this end can be otherwise attained, the obstacle to the exercise of mercy would be removed. The death of Christ is designed to accomplish this object, by making an im- pression on the intelligent universe at least as efficacious in deterring from sin, as the punishment of the actual of- fender would have produced. Such being the object of the Atonement, it consists in sufferings not of a penal character, nor inflicted in the execution of the law, but endured under circumstances adapted to produce the desired impression. Its effect is to remove a governmental difficulty to the dis- pensation of pardons. The third view proceeds on the principle, that the neces- sity of punishment does not arise merely out of the necessity of making an impression on the universe, and on the sinner himself, adapted to deter from sin, but also and primarily out of the inherent ill-desert of sin itself, and thq infinite rectitude of the divine character, in which the idea of dis- tributive justice is included. Consequently, while the Atonement is designed and adapted to produce the deepest impression of the holiness and justice of God on all intelli- gent beings, its primary object is to answer the demands of divine justice. It is, therefore, of the nature of a satisfac- tion, consisting in vicarious punishment, or in the infliction NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 147 of the penalty of the law on Jesus Christ as the substitute of the sinner. And its effect is to secure reconciliation on the condition of faith and repentance. It is the object of this discourse to endeavour to show that the third of these views is the form in which the doc- trine is presented in the word of God. Before entering on the subject, it may be necessary to state the sense in which the terms here employed are used. When it is said, the sufferings of Christ were of the nature of punishment, the word punishment is used in its ordinary acceptation, for suf- fering judicially inflicted, or sufferings imposed in execu- tion of a legal sentence. The idea, of course, is not in- cluded, that the sufferer himself must be chargeable with sin in a moral sense. This would be no less abhorrent to the feelings of those who use this expression, than in- consistent with the plainest declarations of Scripture. Again, when it is said that the penalty of the law was exe- cuted on the Redeemer, it is not intended that his suffer- ings were, either in nature or degree, any more than in duration, the same as would have come on the sinner him- self. Such an idea is not necessarily, nor properly, con- veyed by the expression. The penalty of the law is not any specific degree or character of pain which the law imposes, but it is any and all pain, which sustains to the law the relation of a sanction. Thus, the word death, according to its scriptural use, does not import any one definite form or amount of suffering, but all evil, however varied in nature or intensity, by which sin is punished. Even with regard to human laws, the penalty never in- volves precisely the same kind and degree of pain in its execution. The terms may remain the same, but the character and amount of suffering are modified by ten 148 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. thousand circumstances in the moral character, natural temperament, and physical constitution of the individual. A youth of tender feelings, susceptible conscience, alive to the good opinion of society, with fair prospects and many friends, suffers unspeakably more and differently under the same sentence, than a hardened offender differently cir- cumstanced in all these respects. It is, therefore, of all objections, the least worthy of notice, that Christ's suffer- ings were not penal, because they were not the same in character as those which the actual sinner would have ex- perienced. There may be even an entire commutation of the punishment, without the penal character of the in- fliction being lost. We cling to these expressions, not from any fondness for terms, but because those which we are urged to substitute for them do not express the idea we mean to convey. It is, therefore, in the sense just stated, we maintain, in ac- cordance with the language of the Scriptures, that Christ suffered the penalty of the law. The law threatened death — and Christ suffered death — in the proper scriptural mean- ing of the term; that is, misery or pain judicially inflicted in support of the claims of the law. The definition of the phrase vicarious punishment, we give in the words of a modern Lutheran divine.* "It is suffering judicially inflicted on condition of the exemption of the actual offender." It derives its character from its being judicially substituted for the punishment of the real transgressor, with a view to his pardon. The correctness of this definition is evident from the nature of the transac- tion, and from all the examples and illustrations of vicarious * Storr, Object of the Deatli of Christ. NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 149 sufferings recorded in the Scriptures. It is true, the ex- emption of the offender need not be, and in the case before us, is not, absolute and immediate, but may be suspended on any condition the judge and substitute have pleased to determine. Christ, then, saves us from the penalty of the law by vicariously suffering that penalty in his own person. That this is the doctrine of the Word of God, on this subject, we think can easily be shown, if the two following princi- ples of interpretation be admitted, and faithfully applied. The first is, that as the sacred writers unquestionably meant to be understood by the persons to whom the;,, wrote, they must have employed the terms which they use in the sense which they knew would be attached to them by their readers or hearers, and, consequently, that the business of an inter- preter is to ascertain the sense in which the cotemporaries of the sacred writers employed the terms these writers used, and the mode in which they would naturally conceive the doctrines which they presented. In doing this, he ascer- tains the mode in which the inspired penmen meant to be understood; and the mode in which we are bound to re- ceive their meaning. This simple rule lies at the founda- tion of all certainty in the interpretation of written docu- ments, ancient or modern. The other principle is, that although it is not only proper in itself, but absolutely necessary in a teacher to accommo- date himself to the capacity, the modes of thinking and speaking of his hearers, it is not consistent with fidelity or honesty to employ such a mode of instruction as would naturally lead them into error; or, by adopting their false opinions, to confirm and sanction them. Much less would such a course be consistent with the character of inspired 150 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. teachers, and least of all when teaching the plan of salvation. We are, therefore, never at liberty to assume that the sa- cred writers really meant something different from the ob- vious import of their language, on the ground of their having accommodated themselves to the opinions of those to whom they wrote. To attempt to draw a distinction between what is exegetically true, and what is doctrinally correct, is at once and entirely to destroy the authority of the Scrip- tures as a rule of faith. The Scriptures become a mere set of cabbalistic signs for every man to interpret as he pleases. Nothing more is necessary than this principle to enable any one, not only to explain away every doctrine of the Bible, but to make the Scriptures teach any conceivable system of opinions. And in point of fact, they have thus been made to contain every form of doctrine, from icy deism to ideal pantheism ; and the Apostles alternately presented as hea- then moralists, and mystic philosophers. It is clearly im- possible to prove any thing from Scripture, to the satisfac- tion of those, who either avowedly, or practically, adopt such a principle of interpretation. If we are not to take the simple exegetical meaning of the Bible for its true mean- ing, then we can never know what its meaning is. Let us, under the guidance of the simple rule of construction, that the sacred writers say what they mean, and mean what they knew their readers would understand them to say, in- quire in what way they teach the doctrine of Atonement. That they represent the death of Christ as a vicarious punishment of our sins, we think clear from the following considerations : I. This doctrine is taught in all those passages in which Christ is said " to bear our sins." Thus, repeatedly, in the NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 1^1 fifty-third chapter of Isaiah. ''The Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all." ''He was numbered with the trans- gressors: and he bare the sins of many." "By his know- ledge shall m}'^ righteous servant justify many, for he shall bear their iniquities." It is our duty simply to inquire, what was the import of this phrase among the ancient He- brews; what idea did they attach to the expression, "to bear sin," for this must be the idea which the sacred wri- ter meant to convey. This point is easily decided, as the phrase is one of frequent occurrence in the Scriptures. Thus, in Levit. v. 1, it is said of the man who gives false testimony, "he shall bear his iniquity." As an equiva- lent expression in the next verse, it is said of him who touches any thing unclean, "he also shall be guilty." In V. 17, he who violates the law, though he does it ignorant- ly> "yet is he guilty, and shall bear his iniquity." In chap. vii. IS, he thateateth of a peace-offering on the third day, "shall bear his iniquity." So, xvii. 16, he that does not wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh after eating any thing torn by a wild beast, "shall bear his iniquity." Numb. ix. 13, he that does not partake of the passover "shall be cut off from among his people — he shall bear his sins." This expression is sometimes interchanged (and thereby explained) with the phrase "he shall die," "he shall be cut off from among the people," {Numb. xix. Ifl.) or, "he shall be guilty." In all the numerous passages, therefore, in which these words occur in reference to men, the mean- ing is obvious and uniform, for a man to bear his sins, is to bear the blame of them, to be punished for them. And, accordingly, to bear the sins of another, is to bear the blame of them — to be punished for them. So, in Num,b. xiv. 33, Jeremiah's Lam,, y. 7, and Ezek. xviii. 19, 20, 22 X52 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. "The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son, but the soul that sinneth it shall die." Where the sense is too obvious to be at all questionable. That this is the meaning of the phrase as applied to Christ, by the prophet, is not only evident from the constant usage of the Bible, but from the pro- phet's own explanation, "to bear our sins," is to bear our sorrows, stripes, sickness, chastisement; that is, our punish- ment. It is to be afflicted, wounded, smitten, and that of God, for our sins. It is plain, too, from its use in the sacri- ficial services. After the imposition of hands, and confes- sion, i. e. after the act of substitution, and the symbolical transfer of sin, the dying victim was said to bear the sins of the offerer. And, finally, the same thing is evident from the admitted opinions of ancient nations in reference to this subject. The case, indeed, is so plain, that the interpreta- tion just given has secured the assent of all impartial com- mentators, oi'thodox or infidel. One of the most distin- guished of the latter class, remarks on this phrase, "If we wish to understand such expressions, we must revert to the opinion of all early nations, and especially of the Hebrews, that all calamities, particularly those of more than ordinary severity, were punishments inflicted immediately by God, and that they could only be removed by an innocent victim undergoing the punishment as a substitute, and thus stilling the anger of the offended Deity."* Another of the same class, sa3'S, in reference to representations contained in this chapter, [ha. liii.) "The majority of Hebrew readers, having their minds filled with the ideas of sacrifice and sub- stitution, must, of necessity, have so understood these pas- * Martini on Isaiah, liii. NATURE OF THE ATONExMENT. 153 sages ; and it is not to be doubted, that the mode in which the apostles presented the atoning death of Christ, rests mainly on this ground."* It is, therefore, with the fullest authority of scriptural usage, Grotius asserts, that, "To bear sins by suffering, that others may be pardoned, can mean nothing else than to bear the punishment of those sins."t And Archbishop Magee, though he is willing, for the sake of peace, to give up the word punishment, says, " But it is evident, that it (the suffering of Christ) is, not- withstanding, a judicial infliction;":): the very idea which the word is intended to express. Although, therefore, the expression, "to bear sin," may to our ears, mean either, 1st, to remove it; 2d, to suffer on the occasion of it; or, 3d, to suffer its punishment; to the Jews, it could in such connexions, convey only the last idea, and consequently, to substitute for this either of the two former, is to make it express a sense, which, as we have shown, is contrary to Scripture usage, the opinions of the people to whom the prophet wrote, and therefore contrary to the ob- vious intention of the sacred writer, and mind of the Spirit. It is in this sense, too, the New Testament writers, in ad- dressing those "whose minds were filled with the ideas of sacrifice and substitution," who were imbued with the ideas and language of the Old Testament, assert that Christ "was offered to bear the sins of many," Hebrews ix. 2S, that he "bare our sins in his own body on the tree." 1 Peter ii. 24. So in John i. 29, " Behold the Lamb of God which beareth the sin of the world," (according to the reading of the margin), and 1 John iii. 6, "He was manifested to bear our sins." * Gesenius on Isaiah liii. + Grotii Opera Theologia, vol. iv. p. 300. \ On the Atonement, vol. i. p. 347. See also p. 348. 154 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. II. Precisely the same idea is clearly expressed by the apos- tle in Gal. iii, 13. In this chapter the apostle is engaged in proving, that faith in Christ is the only means by which we can attain the favour of God. One of his arguments is the following: "As many as are of the works of the law, are under the curse ; for it is written, cursed is every one who continueth not in all things written in the book of the law to do them." But " Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, cursed is every one wlio hangeth on a tree." It will of course be admitted that " the curse of the law," is its pe- nalty, and that to be under this curse, and to be 'a curse ' mean the same thing, the apostle himself teaches, as he substitutes for both expressions, the word "cursed." We are ''under the curse," because it is written, "cursed," &c. and Christ was "made a curse," for it is written "cursed, &c. There can be no doubt, therefore, that the literal meaning of this passage is, 'no one can be saved by obedience to the law, because, as the law demands perfect obedience, he who violates the least commandment is exposed to its penalty; but Christ has redeemed us from this penalty by bearing it in our stead.' It hardly seems possible to interpret the apostle's language in any other way. That Christ was pro- perly considered as suffering a penalty, the apostle confirms by appealing to a declaration of the law, that every one ju- dicially condemned was accounted accursed of God, (as the expression is in the passage quoted, Deut. xxi. 23,) i. e. ex- posed as an object of divine displeasure; one on whom, by the divine law, a penalty has fallen. So far, therefore, is this reference to the Old Testament from explaining away the previous assertion, that it is intended to confirm it. According to the doctrine of the apostle, then, NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 155 we are saved from the penalty of the law, by Christ bearing it in our stead. And this seems to be the ground of his arguing so often that Christ's death is tantamount to our death, and that it is not by the relaxation of the law, as to its penalty, but by its execution that we arc saved, "Fori, by the law, am dead to the law," Gal. ii. 19. i. e. free from its demands, so that there is now no condemna- tion to me, nor to any who are in Christ Jesus. III. liom. viii. 3. The same course of reasoning occurs in Rom. viii. 3. ''The salvation which men in vain look for through the law, God has secured in another way. For as the law was insufficient, God having sent his Son in a nature the same with our own, and as a sin offering punished sin in him, that thus the demands of the law might be satis- fied by us." This seems to be the view of the passage best suited to the context, and the peculiar expressions which the apostle here employs. In this passage God is said to have sent his Son "in the likeness of sinful flesh," and it was in this flesh, (or nature) "that he punished or con- demned sin," not in our flesh, for this the context will not allow, but in the flesh in which his Son appeared, i. e. in his person, and the object of this vicarious condemnation is our exemption. IV. The same representation is found in 2 Cor. v. 21. The apostle had stated "that God was reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;" and then states how it is that pardon was thus secured; "God made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." He treated the Redeemer as though he were the sinner — that 156 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. we might be treated as though we were righteous." As, *'to be made the righteousness of God," means to be justi- fied, so, "to be made sin," is to be condemned or made subject to the penalty of the law. As we are not consti- tuted morally righteous, by the death of Christ, so is it infi- nitely far from the apostle's intention to say, that Christ was made, morally, a sinner. Both expressions are ob- viously used in their usual forensic sense. V. We may now refer to those numerous passages in which Christ is said, ''to die for us," "to sufier the just for the unjust," &c. These texts all prove the doctrine of substitution, i. e. that Christ died in our stead. It is true that taken by itself this expression might mean nothing more than that Christ suffered for our benefit, but the fol- lowing reasons seem sufficient to prove that this is not all the sacred writers mean by it. 1. One of the prepositions [avtt,) thus translated, seldom has any other meaning than, '*in the place of." 2. In some connexions this sense is required, as when it is said, "he gave his life a ransom for many," where the force of the word ransom, requires the last words to be rendered, 'in the place of many.' 3. In liom. V. 7, it is said "scarcely for a righteous man will one die," which seems clearly to mean, in the place of a righteous man; and, therefore, when it is said, "but when we were yet sinners Christ died for us," it must mean, in our place. 4. The very expression, to die for a man, who is exposed to death, that he may live, seems with sufficient clearness to express the idea of dying in his stead. 5. The manner in which the death of Christ is said to benefit us, requires this interpretation — it is by bearing our sins — being made a curse for us, i. e. enduring the punishment we had in- NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 157 curred. 6. Finally: If the sacred writers clearly else- where teach, as we have seen they do, the doctrine of legal substitution, then, as their meaning is ascertained as to this point by passages which are obvious as to their im- port, it can be no longer doubtful what they intended when they declare that Christ ''died for us." VI. Another important class of text is that in which Christ is called a ransom, and his work a redemption. It is freely admitted that the words "to redeem" and "re- demption" are often used when merely the general idea of deliverance is meant to be conveyed. As when God is said to have redeemed his people out of Egypt. Their pri- mary and proper meaning, however, as is on all hands ad- mitted, is to deliver by the payment of a ransom. That it is in this, and not in the more general sense of mere deli- verance, they are used in reference to the work of Christ, is evident from the simple consideration that the ransom, or price paid for our deliverance, is expressly stated. Thus in Eph. i. 7, " In whom we have redemption through his blood." 1 Cor. vi. 20.- "Ye are bought with a price." 1 Peter i. IS, 19. "Ye are not redeemed with corruptible things as silver and gold, but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without spot or blemish." Gal. iii. 13. "Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, having been made a curse for us." In all these cases, it is not mere deliverance that is asserted, but deliverance by a spe- cific method; by a ransom, by the payment of a price. It is true these and all similar representations are figurative, but figurative language is often as intelligible as literal, and some- times more so. The simple question is, what idea would this language naturally excite in the minds of men accus- 158 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. tomed to regard their sacrifices as ransoms, and familiar with the mode of deliverance which these expressions pro- perly describe? It is impossible that this mode of repre- sentation should fail of exciting the idea of deliverance on the o-round of a satisfaction. This Christ and his Apostles knew; and this idea, therefore, they must have intended to convey. VII. We may appeal to the frequently recurring passages in which Christ is said to propitiate God, or to make recon- ciliation for the sins of the people; or to be himself a pro- pitiation, which all imply that the object of the atonement is to satisfy divine justice. God is represented as angry with the wicked, and the death of Christ, as the means by which he is propitiated. As anger among men is common- ly a modification and expression of malice, we know that from association these expressions are apt to excite ideas derogatory to the divine perfection, and furnish an easy topic of declamatory misrepresentation. But it should be remembered, that these are scriptural expressions, expres- sions intended to convey important truth, and to represent ideas, which, so far from being inconsistent with divine ex- cellence, necessarily enter into the conception of infinite perfection. The anger of God is the expression of his dis- approbation of sin; the exhibition of his holiness in view of moral evil; or, in other words, the manifestation of his justice. It is to turn off from us this anger, by rendering our pardon consistent with the justice of the divine Being, that Christ died. And this is expressed in the terms just mentioned. For when God is said to reconcile the world unto himself, or we to be reconciled to him, (in such connexions,) the idea is not that we are led to lay aside our NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 159 enmity towards him, but that this favour is propitiated for us, as the word means, 'to restore to the favour of any one.' It is thus used, in the command of our Saviour, "If thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath ought against thee, first go and be reconciled to thy brother," i. e. first go and satisfy him and regain his favour. And in Rom. v. 10. " In whom we have obtained reconciliation," i. e. restoration to the the divine favour. In the phrase "making reconciliation for sin," Ileb. ii. 17, it, of course, caif have no other meaning. That this is the sense of these expressions is further evident from the means by which this reconciliation is effected, it is "by the death of his Son," by his cross, by Christ being made sin for us. VIII. The only other class of texts to which our limits will permit us to refer, is perhaps the largest and most im- portant of all. The work of Christ is at least more fully illustrated, if not more frequently expressed, by a reference to the sacrifices of the Old Testament than in any other way. He is called the Lamb of God, John i. 19, a propi- tiation, or propitiatory sacrifice, Rom. iii. 24, a sin offering Rom. viii. 5, an acceptable sacrifice, Eph. v. 2. He is de- clared and proved to be a Priest, Heb. v. and all the duties of the office are ascribed to him, the sacrifice, which he of- fered, was himself. " He offered himself without spot unto God," Heb. ix. 12. ''He was once offered to bear the sins of man)'," Heb. ix. 28. He offered a sacrifice for sin, "once when he offered up himself," Heb. vii. 27. The effects of his sufferings are in like manner described in terms bor- rowed from the sacrificial services. " Having by himself purged our sins," Heb. i. 3. If the blood of bulls and of goats was of any avail, " how much more shall the blood 23 160 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. of Christ purge your consciences for dead works," Heb. ix. 14. " He appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself," Heb. ix. 2Q. "We are sanctified through the of- fering of the body of Christ," Heb. x. 10. "The blood of Jesus Christ cleanses from all sin," 1 John i. 7. All these expressions refer, not to moral purification, but to the removal of the guilt of sin, by atonement. So also the mode of application of the benefits of his death is express- ed, by sprinkling his blood on the conscience, to indicate its pardoning efficacy; or on the throne of God, as expres- sive of its influence in propitiating the divine favour. Is it conceivable that such representations, made not casual- ly, or by allusion, but dwelt upon, urged, defended and ar- gued, could fail to produce in the minds of those, who from their youth had been familiar with sacrificial rites, the con- viction that the sacred writers meant to teach, that Christ was really a sacrifice in their sense of the term, that his death saves us from the penalty of the law in the same way as the sacrifices of the old dispensation saved the Jews from the consequences of the transgression of the law of Moses? If this be admitted, then must we adm.it, that the sacred wri- ters intended to produce this conviction. For who will maintain they designedly led their readers into error; that inspired men were intentional deceivers while propounding the method of salvation. In what light, then, are the sacrifices of the Old Testament presented in the Scriptures? We are clearly taught that they sustained a two-fold relation; the one to the theocratical polity of the Jewish state, and the other to the great truths which were afterwards to be revealed. In the former reS' pect, we learn, in the first place, that they were concerned about God, designed to propitiate his favour, and thus securie NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 161 the pardon of sin; and in the second that this was eflfected through the medium cf vicarious-^nishment. Both of these points seem evident froni the language, rites, and opinions of the ancient Hebrews, and the ancient world in general. The design of these services, is, indeed, clear- ly indicated by the expressions to propitiate, make recon- ciliation for, and others of similar import, as already re- marked; and the nature of the observance shows how this was to be accomplished. When a man had violated any of the laws of Moses, the penalty was excision from among the people. The method prescribed by the judge and head of the Jewish state for averting this evil, was to pre- sent a victim to suffer in his place. But suffering, judicially imposed on one with the view to the exemption of another, is the definition of vicarious punishment. This idea of sub- stitution and transfer of sin, was clearly expressed by the imposition of hands and confession of sin over the head of the sacrifice. And hence, after this ceremony, the victim was said to bear the sins of the offender, i. e. to bear the blame or guilt of them, and being thus laden, was considered unclean, and, at times, burnt without the camp, and all who touched it were regarded as defiled. All this to be sure is figurative, but these figures are designed to teach something, to teach that pardon was to be obtained only through the me- dium of vicarious punishment. This is the essential, formal idea of a sin-offering. In the language of Grotius, "They secured pardon, by inducing God to forgive, on the ground of a satisfaction." p. 330. Such being the obvious nature and import of those rites in relation to the Mosaic cere- mony, their connexion with the Christian dispensation is not less clear, and far more important. As typical institu- tions, they were designed to teach by significant actions, 162 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. by prefiguring, to predict and explain the method of salva- tion through Jesus Christ, the Lamb of God, who was to bear the sins of the world. Their own efficacy, in securing pardon, did not extend beyond the mere ceremonial and civil penalties of the old dispensation. As it was impossible that the blood of bulls or of goats could take away sin, they had no bearing on the relation of the offender to God as Judge and moral governor of the universe. But if, as the Apostle reasons, they availed to the purifying of the flesh, to the removal of mere external disabilities, how much more shall the blood of Christ, who, possessed of an eternal spirit, i. e. a divine nature, offered himself unto God, avail to the pardon of sin. In the comparisons so frequently in- stituted between Christ and the ancient sacrifices, it is to be remarked that it is not the result or effect merely that is taken into view. He is called a sacrifice, not merely be- cause he secures pardon, but the mode in which this is done is the very point of the comparison; he is a sacrifice, be- cause he takes our place, bears our sins, is made a curse for us, and thus propitiates God in our behalf. All the ideas, therefore, of substitution, legal transfer of sin, vicarious pu- nishment, and propitiation, which enter into the Jewish idea of a sacrifice are, over and over, asserted to meet in the great atonement by Jesus Christ. It is, therefore, in the Jewish sense of the term, that he is called a sacrifice for sin. It is easy, indeed, to get over all this, by simply substi- tuting for the ancient view of sacrifices, our own idea of what they were, or ought to have been. To assert that they were merely symbols, or signs of God's disapprobation of sin, designed to exhibit and impress that truth on the minds of all concerned; and thence infer that in this sense, and to NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 163 this extent, Christ was a sacrifice. Or, as others have done, maintain that they were only intended to make the sinner feel his guilt, and assure him of pardon, and then limit the death of Christ to the same objects. This, however, is in- terpreting Scripture not according to the views of its wri- ters, but according to our own views of the nature and fit- ness of things. It is not taking; the sense of the Bible as we find it, but interposing a sense of our own. It is obvi- ous if we once abandon the rule of interpretation so often referred to, if we do not understand the Bible in the way in which the inspired writers knew they would be under- stood by their readers; then are we far and hopelessly at sea, without a star to guide us. One man has as good a right to interpose his sense of the terms of Scripture as another; one may as well say, a sacrifice was designed to impress the offerer, as another it was intended to impress spectators. Which is right, or whether either, is a matter to be debated at the bar of reason; and the plan of salvation is made to await the decision. Our only hope of any solid foundation for faith, or of any security for truth, is to receive the Scriptures in the sense which they were designed and adapted to convey to the minds of their original readers.* When, Christian Brethren, we remember that the repre- sentations just given, are not casual or incidental, but that they pervade the sacred volume, are insisted upon, illustrated, established and defended, made the grounds of doctrinal and practical inferences; when we remember, that Christ is said to have borne the punishment of our sins, in the plainest terms the language of the Old Testament admits of; that he * The limitations to which this principle is subject, do not affect the view here given. 164 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. was made sin, or treated as a sinner in our place; that he bore the curse of the law; that he died in our stead; that he gave his life as our ransom; bought us with his blood; that he propitiated God on our behalf, and saved us as a sacri- fice; can we hesitate to admit that the very constituent idea of atonement is vicarious punishment. This doctrine, thus clearly taught in the word of God, has an advocate even in natural conscience; for this is the light in which sacrificial rites have been viewed in all ages, and among all people, Gentiles as well as Jews. No mat- ter how various the offerings, nor how diversified the cere- monies, the object of such rites was the satisfaction of di- vine justice, and the means, vicarious punishment. And it may be assumed that this is the form in which the doc- trine presents itself to every pious unsophisticated reader of the Bible. When oppressed with a sense of sin, he feels that some atonement must be made to God. The at- tribute which leads Him to punish, the convinced sinner sees to be perfectly lovely and excellent, and it is not until he discovers some method by which the exercise of mercy can be reconciled with justice, that pardon appears possible. Such a method he finds revealed in the cross of Christ. There he sees that the penalty of the broken law has been endured in his stead. It is this that reconciles him so cordi- ally to the Gospel, and enables him to embrace, without any misgivings, the offers of mercy there presented. It is not un- til he has been taught by others, what is called, the philoso- phy of the subject, that he is led to imagine all this is a de- lusion, that the atonement, instead of being designed as a satisfaction or propitiation to God, is intended either to im- press his own heart, or to symbolize a general truth for the instruction of the universe. And even when thus in- NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 165 structed, he reverts in his ordinary exercises of faith and devotion to the scriptural representations of the subject. This too, let me add, is the form in which the doctrine has been held in the Christian Church from first to last. For although during the ages in which the Scriptures were buried, many absurd ideas were entertained on this subject; yet when the Reformation brought them again to light; this was the doctrine which burst with redeeming brightness from the sacred pages. Much and bitterly as the men of that day disputed about other points, in this they were agreed. Lutherans and Calvinists, the Hugo- nots of France and the Reformed of Holland, the Scotch Presbyterians and English Reformers, all conspired to re- present this as the cardinal doctrine of the Gospel, the article of a rising or a falling Church. The Atonement, then, Christian Brethren, as exhibiting the mode of the sinner's salvation, is the characteristic doc- trine of the Gospel. Its direct object is the reconciliation of men to God. To secure pardon of sin, the sanctification of their nature, and eternal life. In this light, who can comprehend the importance of the work of Christ! Let any one endeavour to estimate the value of these results in the case of any one individual. Let him ask, what it is for one soul to be delivered from hell and raised to heaven; to be freed from eternal degradation and misery, and raised to eternal purity and happiness; let him strain his powers to the utmost to take in the full blessedness of such a redemp- tion. And when he finds how vain is the effort, let him ask himself what he ought to think and feel in view of the ten thousand times ten thousand, and thousands of thou- sands redeemed out of every nation, and kindred, and tonguq under the whole heaven, a multitude which no man can 16G SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. number, whose robes have been made white in the blood of the Lamb. Inconceivably great as is the amount of blessedness thus effected, its accomplishment is not the sole object of the death of Christ. The rays from the cross are cast far on- ward to the utmost verge of the universe of God. Where- ever there are immortal minds to see or learn the exhibi- tion here made of the divine character, there do the effects of the atonement reach. So far from supposing that the view of the subject, which we have endeavoured to present, excludes the idea of a moral impression on the world of intelligent spirits, we consider that the Atonement derives its adaptedness to produce this impression, from the fact of its being a satisfaction to divine justice. When that most wonderful of all commands was heard in heaven, *' Awake sword, against the man that is mine equal, saith the Lord," then was it seen and felt, that though heaven and earth should perish, the law of God must stand; that sin was in- deed an evil so enormous that to pass it with impunity was impossible. Only so far as the atonement involves an ex- ercise of justice, is it a manifestation of justice. Viewed in the light, not of setting aside the penalty of the law, but as involving its execution, it is better adapted to seal the con- viction on all minds of the immutability of the law, and of the certainty of sin being punished, than the eternal con- demnation of ten thousand worlds. It is, as the Apostle informs us, the fact that Christ was possessed of an eternal spirit, or divine nature, Heh. ix. 14, and thus was equal with God, Phil. ii. 8, which gives the Atonement its effi- cacy. It is this that fills the wondering universe with awe, and constitutes the most effective of all exhibitions of the divine holiness and justice. Whatever moral impression, ?^r NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 167 therefore, the exhibition of divine justice can produce, is thus most effectually made, and whatever benefit, in deter- ing from sin, this impression can effect, is thus secured. The law is sustained and vindicated, by being executed; or its transgression, with impunity, by man or seraph, is felt through all worlds to be impossible. This truth is made to bear with all its force upon the sin- ner. "If these things be done in the green tree, what shall be done in the dry," — if it was not possible that the cup of wrath should pass from the Saviour's lips, from whose lips shall it pass? Where is the man who believes the doctrine of Atonement, who does not feel that his destruction is just and inevitable, if he neglect the salvation of the Gospel? Who does not feel that it is the utmost limits of infatuation to believe that the sinner can escape, if God spared not his own Son? The ill desert of sin, and the certainty of its punishment, are, however, not the only truths exhibited in the death of Christ. God commendeth his love towards us, in that while we were yet enemies Christ died for us, God so loved the world that he sent his Son. It is this attribute which is most conspicuously displayed in the cross of Christ. It is this, therefore, which is the constant theme of praise with the sacred writers; a love whose height, and depth, and length, and breadth, are beyond our knowledge. As it is by the exhibition of .truth, and especially of the character of God, that holiness is sustained and exercised in all created minds; so does the Atonement become of all means perhaps the most effective in promoting holiness throughout the whole universe. It is the exhibition here made, which commonly leads men to repentance. It is here they see the evil of sin; the holiness and love of God; 24 168 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. the wonderful grace of their Redeemer. It is here they learn the vileness and ingratitude of their conduct; it is when they look on Him whom they have pierced, that they mourn and turn unto God with contrition and penitence. It is from the cross, too, that the Christian derives his most active impulses to duty and self-denial. Constrained by the love of Christ, Paul laboured and suffered with constancy and alacrity. And it is the same influence which now re- strains from sin, and urges on to duty, all faitliful followers of the Redeemer. Nor is the effect confined to our world. If, when God spread these garnished heavens, and called these countless worlds, with their endless variety of happy inhabitants into being, a shout of rapture was heard in heaven, at this display of his wisdom, power, and good- ness; we need not wonder that the sons of God regard with interest the work of Redemption. It is into the deeper wonders and brighter, glories of this new creation, they desire to look; and thence they derive their chief materials of praise. As a means of promoting holiness and happi- ness, therefore, among all orders of intelligent beings, and throughout all eternity, the cross of Christ is perhaps of all others the most effective. The effect which the consideration of this doctrine ought to have on Christians, time does not permit us to indicate. Paul tells us, that having such a high Priest, we should hold fast our profession, never be tempted to give up either the faith or hope of the Gospel; that we should come with boldness to the throne of grace; that we should live for Him, who died for us; that, having experienced tlie un- searchable riches of Christ, we should esteem it the chief business and honour of our lives, to endeavour to bring others to the enjoyment of its blessing; that we should fix NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 169 no limits to our desire for the extension of the knowledge of the Saviour, until it covers the earth as the waters do the great deep. We should esteem all sacrifices and all efforts slight for the attainment of this object. Do what we will, suffer what we may, for the salvation of others, it will all be little, compared with what Christ has done and suffered for us. And it will all appear little in our own eyes when we enter in the eternal world. Though this doctrine has always proved a stumbling block in the way of some, and foolishness in the eyes of others; it is nevertheless the wisdom of God unto salva- tion. Presenting the plan which infinite wisdom has de- vised for the redemption of men, it teaches most clearly to those who refuse to accede to its terms, that they make their own destruction sure. The refuges of lies to which they betake themselves will not stand a moment before the coming storm of divine wrath. Their prayers or penances; their deeds of charity or honesty, will avail nothing in averting the sword of divine justice. Rejecting the offer- ing of Christ, there remains no other sacrifice for sin; re- fusing this Saviour, there is no other name given under heaven whereby they can be saved. The obvious impera- tive duty of all such, is an immediate return to God through Jesus Christ, a sincere and penitent acquiescence in the plan of salvation proposed in the Gospel. Hear, then, and obey the voice of the dying Saviour from the cross, "Look unto me all ye ends of the earth, and be ye saved." And now, unto him who loved us and gave himself for us, be blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, even un- to him that sitteth on the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever. Amen. SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. LECTURE VII. Delivered on the Evening of the l3iA February, 1832, hy the Rev. Samuel Miller, D. D. of Princeton, N. J. ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. " The Elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an Elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed : Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly ; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind ; neither as being lords over God's heritage, but being examples to the flock." — 1 Peter v. 1, 2, 3. The Bible knows nothing of a solitary religion. The spirit and duties of Christianity are, characteristically, social. Man, in his state of primitive rectitude, was made a social creature; and redeemed and restored man, when he shall reach that holy heaven which is in reserve for him hereafter, will find it to be a state of perfect and most blessed society. It is true, the Christian, in the course of the spiritual life, is required, and finds it to be as profitable as it is delightful, to be often alone with his God. But the object of this retirement is, like that of Moses in as- cending the mount, — not that he may remain there; but 25 172 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. that he may come down with his face shining; his heart expanding with holy love; and all his graces refined and invigorated, and thus prepared the better to act his part in those interesting relations which he sustains to his fellow men. Accordingly, the visible Church, with which we are all bound to be connected, and which is the means of so many blessings to its members and to the world, is a social body. It is called in our text a <'flock," under the care of the great "Shepherd and Bishop of souls," and under the immediate superintendence of the under-shep- herds, commissioned and sent for this purpose. "The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ. Feed the flock of God which is among you." The word here translated "feed," literally signifies to perform the work of a shep- herd; — to guard and govern^ as well as to dispense food to the flock. And, accordingly, this rendering is confirm- ed, not only by many other Scriptures, but also by the charge which immediately follows: — <' Taking the over- sight thereof; — not as lord's over God's heritage, but as examples to the flock." We have here presented, then, very distinctly, the idea of the Church, or the "flock" of God, being under government. It is represented as being placed, by its great Head and Lord, under superin- tendence and regulation. In all society there must be government, from a family to a nation. There was government in the garden of Eden, where human nature was perfect; and there is now, and ever will be, govern- ment in Heaven, where ihe happy inhabitants, redeemed from all the remains of sin, shall be made perfectly blessed in the full enjoyment of God to all eternity. There have been, indeed, enthusiasts and fanatics, in E(XLESIASTICAL POLITY. 173 ancient as well as modern times, who taught that, in the true Church there can be no need or place for govern- ment; ''because," said they, "the members of the Church being all holy persons, cannoi be ^ supposed to require either law or authority to''3Hstain*mem; nothing but the evangelical law of love, by which they are all sponta- neously and, of course, regulated." But the advocates of this delusive theory forgot that the members of the visible Church are not all truly sanctified persons ; and that even those of their number who are the sincere friends of Christ, are sanctified only in part, and, therefore, need the salutary application of discipline. They forgot, too, that in almost every page, the New Testament recognizes, either directly or indirectly, the necessity and the actual existence of rule and authority in all the apostolic churches, even in their simplest and purest form. Nor must we forget that the vain theory of these fanatical teachers has been invariably found as worthless, and even mischievous in practice, as it was contrary, at once, to the principles of human nature, and to the instructions of holy Scripture. It has always resulted in disorder, licentiousness, and every evil work. Quite as erroneous and no less pernicious in its conse- quences, was the doctrine of Erastus, the learned and in- genious contemporary of the Reformers.* He taught that the Church, as such, can possess no power, and ought not to be allowed to exercise any authority or discipline; upon the alleged principle, that "a government within a gov- ernment" is a practical absurdity, and by no means admis- sible. His theory, of course, was, that all lawful authority * See his work, De Excommunieatione Ecclesiaetica, 174 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. resides only in the civil government ; that the ministers of the Church may instruct, persuade and exhort, but nothing more ; and that when crimes against religion occur, the offenders can be reached and punished only by the civil magistrate. In short, his doctrine was, that the civil gov- ernment alone can exercise authority in any community; and, consequently, tliat no man, as a professor of religion, can incur any penalty, for the most serious delinquency, with regard either to faith or pi'actice, unless he be prose- cuted and convicted before the tribunal of the State. A theory more weak and fanciful, could scarcely have been proposed. It contradicts the most abundant scriptural tes- timony in favour of ecclesiastical government, as distinct from the civil, hereafter to be produced: and it is practi- cally refuted by the experience of every day. The au- thority and discipline exercised in every family, and in every seminary of learning, plainly show that the funda- mental principle on which the whole theory rests is alto- gether delusive; that there may be ten thousand govern- ments within a government, without the least collision or interference. Accordingly, in whatever direction we turn our eyes among the ajjostolic churches ;— whether to Jerusalem or Antioch, to Ephesus or Crete.) to Corinth or Rome, we find the corruption of human nature disclosing itself in various forms; we find the outbreaking of pride, ambition, heresy, and moral irregularity, disturbing the peace of the Church, and calling for the application of its wise and wholesome discipline; in other words, for the exercise of its govern- ment. Now, if such were the case in the days of inspira- tion and miracle, under the eyes of the apostles themselves, and when the spirit of love might be said pre-eminently to ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 175 reign in the Church; what is to be expected when these extraordinary aids are taken away, and the covenanted family of Christ left to the ordinary power of the means which he has appointed for its edification ? It is evident, then, that there is, and, from the very na- ture of the case, must be, ecclesiastical government; that the Church of Christ, as such, has essentially vested in her a certain kind and degree of authority, which she is bound, in fidelity to her Lord and Master, to exercise for the great purposes which she was founded to accomplish. The principal questions in relation to this subject which demand an answer, are the three following: What is the NATURE of this government? What are its limits? And what is its legitimate and scriptural end? Let me request your serious and candid attention to some remarks intended to furnish a brief answer to each of these questions. I. Let us begin with inquiring into the nature of that ecclesiastical government which the Word of God appears to warrant. And in order to ascertain this with any degree of certainty and clearness, it will be necessary previously to determine what are \he purposes for which the Church was founded: because it is manifest that all that power which is really indispensable to the attainment of these purposes, must, of course, be considered as vested in the Church; and she, as not only at liberty, but as bound to exercise. We are taught, then, in Scripture that the visible Church is a body, called out of the world, and established under the authority of her divine Head and Lord, that she may be a faithful depository of Gospel truth, worship, and order; that she may carefully maintain, and diligently propagate the genu- 26 176 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. inedoctrines of our holy religion, in opposition to all heresy; that she may preserve in their simplicity and purity the or- dmances which the Master has appointed, hearing testimony against all superstition and will-worship; that she may pro- mote holy living among all her members, in the midst of a world lying in wickedness; and that she may thus be a nur- sery to train Immortal souls for the kingdom of heaven. All this is so evident from Scripture that formal proof is unnecessary. And if this representation be correct, then it follows, ■ 1. In the first place, that in all legitimate ecclesiastical government, the Lord Jesus Christ is the sole Fountain of power. By his authority the Church is instituted. He is her divine King and Head. His word is her statute-book; her only infallible rule of faith and practice. She has no power to institute other rites or ceremonies than those which he has appointed; no right to enjoin any thing which is not found in Scripture, or which cannot "by good and necessary consequence," be established by Scripture. "All power in heaven, and on earth is given to him. He is the head over all things for the Church. Call no man master, for one is your Master even Christ." All the authority, then, of ecclesiastical rulers is derived. They can exercise no power but that which is delegated to them by Him in whose name they come, and by whose commission they act. 2. The authorized government of the Church is wholly moral or spiritual in its nature. That is, it has a respect, exclusively, io moral objects, and is to be carried on, exclu- sively, by moral means. "My kingdom," said the Sa- viour, " is not of this world ;" by which he meant to say, that it is wholly separate from, and independent of, all earth- ly governments. It is not conducted on worldly principles. ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 177 It is not maintained by ''carnal weapons." Its laws, its sanctions, and its end are all spiritual. It has nothing to do with corporeal penalties, or secular coercion. No means, in a word, but those which are moral, that is, those which are addressed to the understanding, the conscience, and the heart, can be lawfully employed in that kingdom which " is not meat and drink, but righteousness, and peace, and joy in the Holy Ghost." 3. Further; in laying down the nature of ecclesiastical authority, it is plain, from the design of the Church, that she must be considered as invested with power to iiiain- tain, within her sacred precincts, the pure doctrines of the Gospel. If these doctrines were delivered to her, that she might be their keeper and guardian, then, surely, she not only has the right, but. is bound to adhere to them; — to maintain them against all opposition; — and to publish her testimony in their favour, from time to time, in the form of creeds, confessions, and other formularies, as the state of the Church and the world may demand. The Church, in- deed, has no right to compel any one to receive her doc- trines; no right to impose her creed or confession on the conscience of any human being. But she must, obviously, have power to do that which her Master has commanded her to do, viz. to "hold fast," for herself, "the form of sound words once delivered to the saints; " and to prevent any, within her bosom, from denying or dishonouring it. Even if the Church were a mere voluntary association, she would, of course, have the power, which all voluntary as- sociations have, of declining to receive as members those who are hostile to her essential design; and also of exclud- ing those who are found, after admission, to entertain and publish opinions subversive of her vital interests as a body. 178 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. But the Church is more than a mere voluntary association. She is a body organized under the authority of her divine Head and Lord; and must, of course, be vested with power to decline all fellowship with those who reject that system of holy doctrine which she is required to maintain. It is per- fectly manifest that the exercise of this power is neither in- consistent with the acknowledged supremacy of Christ in his Church, nor hostile to the most perfect enjoyment of Chris- tian liberty. It cannot be deemed inconsistent with the su- preme authority of Christ; because the Church, in forming, publishing, and maintaining her creed, professes to receive no other doctrines than those which Christ has revealed; and to receive them as being, and because they are taught in his Word; and to warn all her members against oppo- site doctrines, for this very reason, that they are opposed to the will of Christ. Nor is the exercise of the power in question in the least degree hostile to the enjoyment of Christian liberty. Because the Church compels no one to enter her communion; she only states what she considers her divine Master as requiring her to believe, and to prac- tice; and practically declares, that those who reject any of the important doctrines, which go to make up the substance of that Gospel which he has committed to her to keep and to propagate, cannot be admitted to her fellowship. Is this an invasion of Christian liberty ? Nay, is it not rather one of the indispensable means oi protecting liberty of con- science? Surely a body of professing Christians have a right to decide, and to profess what doctrines they consider as agreeable to the Word of God, and as represented by that Word as essential to the Gospel. And they have, quite as evidently, a further right of agreeing among themselves that none can be admitted to the number of their members, ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 179 and especially of their public teachers and rulers, who avow opinions adapted, in their view, to destroy their purity and peace. If they have not this right, there is an end of all re- ligious liberty. If an individual, who entertains materially different views of Gospel truth and order from those re- ceived by such an associated body of Christians, can force himself, contrary to the wishes of the body, into the ranks of their instructors and guides; on whose part, I ask, are the rights of conscience in this case, invaded? Surely the individual who thus intrudes is the invader, and the Church which he enters becomes oppressed. If the rights of con- science either mean or are worth any thing, they are 7nu- tual; and, of course, a body of professing Christians who think alike^ have as good a right to enjoy them in undis- turbed peace, as any individual who differs from them, and yet wishes to join their body, can possibly have to enjoy without molestation his opinions. If so, every attempt on the part of the latter to intrude himself among the teachers of the former, is an invasion of that "liberty wherewith Christ came to make his people free." 4. Again; it is manifest, from the purpose for which the Church was founded, that she must be, and is vested with the power to exclude from her fellowship those who violate the laws of practical holiness. To den}" the Church this power, would be to deny her that which is indispensable to herobey- ing the Master's command, to "■ have no fellowshij) with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather to reprove them." She is said to be "the light of the world;" to be " the salt of the earth; " to be a "witness" of the holiness as well as of the truth of God, in the midst of a rebellious and un- believing world. She is commanded to " withdraw her- self from every brother that walketh disorderly," and to 180 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. " keep herself unspotted from the world." But how are these characteristics to be realized; how are these com- mands to be obeyed, without the possession, and the exer- cise of a power to exclude from the Christian society those who are found to bear a character inconsistent with the honour of religion and the edification of the sacred family ? Without this power to rebuke, to censure, and ultimately, if need be, to banish from the fellowship of the professing people of God, the Church can present no visible, effective testimony in favour of Gospel holiness; there can be no real separation between the precious and the vile; no sacred fence, inclosing the "garden of the Lord" from the world. And, without such an inclosure, there may be a CONGREGATION, but I will venture to say, there can be no Church. Of course, one of the most important purposes which a visible, professing people of God were intended to answer, would be, in this case, virtually abandoned. 5. It is further manifest, that the nature of ecclesiastical government must be such as will enable the Church to regulate, agreeably to the laws of Christ, the choice and INVESTITURE OF ALL HER OFFICERS. If the Church WCrC, in this respect, powerless ; if all that pleased, however ignorant, erroneous in doctrine, or profligate in practice, might thrust themselves into the number of her teachers and rulers, contrary to her wishes and the command of her Master, she would be destitute of the means of self- defence, and self-preservation. Corruption, dishonour, and eventual destruction must inevitably ensue. No soci- ety could exist in peace and order for a year together, without the power of regulating the choice and induction of her own officers. Accordingly, the New Testament abounds with directions in reference to this important ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 181 point of ecclesiastical order. It every where represents the Church as authorised and required to exercise a sove- reign power in this matter; to examine and make trial of those who are candidates for sacred office; and to commit the great work of instruction and rule in the house of God to none but those whose knowledge, soundness in the faith, fidelity and zeal, are adapted to promote her edification. 6. It is clear also, from the nature and design of the Church, that her government, if it be of any value, must be of such a nature as will enable her to settle within herself all the ordinary controversies and difficulties which arise within her bosom. The members of the visible Church, even when sincere in their religious pro- fession, are sanctified, as was before remarked, only in part. Of course, -they are compassed about with many infirmities ; and hence difierences of opinion, variance, conflicting claims, and multiplied forms of offence and complaint often arise — between the private members of the same Church: between ministers, and the people of their re- spective charges; between the pastors of different churches; and between different churches of the same denomination. Now, when these complaints and controversies arise, the Church ought to be prepared to meet them; and when she is obliged, from the want of appropriate and adequate provision in her form of government, to resort, for set- tling them, to foreign arbitration, and even to civil courts; she undoubtedly labours under a serious defect in her ecclesiastical organization. It cannot be such an organiza- tion as the Master has appointed. The inspired Apostle expressly reprobates the practice of Christians going out of the Church to reconcile differences, and to adjust matters in controversy. He evidently teaches that the Church 183 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. ought to have tribunals of her own, by which all questions and difficulties, of an ecclesiastical kind, may be authorita- tively decided. And that Church which is destitute of such tribunals — however richly and happily furnished in other- respects — will undoubtedly find herself unable to carry into effect some very important provisions exhibited in the New Testament for maintaining Christian order and edification. 7. Another characteristic of ecclesiastical polity, indis- pensable to the attainment of the great purposes for which it was instituted is, that it be such as loill bind all the parts of the Church together in one homogeneous body ; and enable all these parts to act together with authority and efficiency, for the benefit of the whole. There is a visible Church catholic, comprising all those of every denomination, who profess the true religion, together with their children. These, though divided from each other by oceans and continents, as well as by names and forms, are all one Church, "one body in Christ, and every one members one of another." They do not, nay, they cannot, all worship together. Prejudices and misap- prehensions, as well as local separation and numbers, prevent them from all assembling in the same edifice. But still, as they are all united to the same divine Head, so, it is delightful to remember, whether they acknow- ledge it or not, that, in a very important sense, they are one covenanted people, and are bound to recognize each other as such, as far as circumstances will admit. But if this be so, much more ought those Churches which bear the same name, profess the same faith, and are so situated as to admit of their being ecclesiastically connected, to make a point of sustaining this connexion with each other ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 183 in reality, as well as nominally. Now, I say, that such a Church cannot be so united as to answer all the purposes which her divine Head, as well as her own peace and edification require, without a form of polity which will enable all the several parts of the body, to meet together, by their representatives, in appropriate judicatories ; to plan, consult, and decide for the benefit of the whole body; and that not merely by way of advice, but by authorita- tive acts, to correct abuses, redress grievances, obviate the approach of error, heal schismatic contention, promote the unity, purity, and co-operation of the whole body; and employ this co-operation in spreading the glorious Gospel for the conversion of the world. If the Church is com- manded to maintain this unity; if she is required, in all her several branches, to ''walk by the same rule," and to *' speak the same thing;" and if she is commanded, as a Church, to be active in sending the Gospel "to every creature;" — then, surely her Master has not withheld from her the means which are indispensable to the attain- ment of the end. If this principle be admitted, then the system of our Independent Brethren, who reject all au- thoritative Synods ; all courts of review and control ; labours under a defect of the most serious kind. It makes no provision for the Churches of the same denomination acting with harmony and authority as one body. And so far as Congregationalism is chargeable with the same de- ficiency, as it undoubtedly is in some parts of our country, as well as in Great Britain, it is altogether powerless in respect to many of those things in which the Church is called to act as a united body. 8. A farther and very important feature- of that go- vernment which the Church is warranted in exercising, 27 184 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES, is, that it be of such a nature as that it may be car- ried into execution in all parts of the world, and under any and every form of civil government. As Christ's kingdom "is not of this world;" in other words, as the government of the Church has no necessary connex- ion, and ought never to be in fact connected, with the government of the State ; it can, of course, operate without obstruction, and accomplish all its legitimate objects, without the aid, and even in spite of the enmity of the civil government, whatever may be its form. Of this we need no stronger evidence than i\\e.fact, that the Christian Church, for nearly three centuries, did exist, and did exercise all the power for which wo contend, while it had no connexion with the State ; nay, while the State frowned and persecuted, and did all in its power to destroy the Church. Amidst all this hostility from the world, the rulers of the Church went forward, without turning to the right hand or the left, carrying the Gospel of the grace of God wherever they were permitted ; instructing the peo- ple; baptizing and receiving to the fellowship of the Church those whom they thought worthy ; exercising a sacred moral inspection over all their members ; admonish- ing and censuring the disorderly; excluding those who were incorrigibly offensive, with regard either to faith or practice; and, in a word, exercising, for all moral purpo- ses, that authority which the King of Zion had committed to them for the edification of his sacred family. Here was an undoubted example — notwithstanding the dream of Erastus to the contrary — of a government within a go- vernment, and each proceeding without interference ; be- cause, as long as each kept in its proper place, they could not possibly come in collision with each other. In like e(x;lesiastical polity. 185 manner, the Church of Christ, in all ages, as long as she adheres to the spirit of that government which alone the Saviour has warranted, may carry it into plenary execution in any land, in any state of society, and under any form of civil government; nay, though all the governments of the world should again be, as they once were, firmly leagued against her. 9. The last characteristic which I shall mention of that government which the Church is warranted by Scripture to exercise, is, that it be not, in any of its features, adapt- ed to promote ambition, to excite a lordly and as- piring spirit in the Church. "Neither," says the Apos- tle, "as LORDS OVER God's HERITAGE, but as examples to the flock." A love of pre-eminence and of power is natural to man. It is one of the earliest, strongest, and most universal principles of our nature. It reigns without control in wicked men; and has more influence than it ought to have in the minds of the most pious. And when we recollect to what complicated and deplorable mischiefs this spirit has given rise in the Church of God, — corrupt- ing her doctrines, alienating her members and ministers, disturbing her peace, and breaking her unity; — it is surely desirable that every thing in the form of ecclesiastical polity should be, as far as possible, adapted to obviate and repress the spirit of which we speak. Accordingly, our blessed Saviour, not only while he was on earth, frowned with severity upon every thing which looked like aspiring and ambition among his followers, declaring that the ques- tion, "which shall be the greatest?" ought to have no place in his kingdom; for that all his ministers were fel- low-servants, and that none of them should seek to be called "master," or "rabbi:" — but he also, as we confi- 186 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. dently believe, after his resurrection, appointed a form ol ecclesiastical order, which placed all pastors upon an equal- ity, and precluded the possibility of any one ''lording it" over another in virtue of any official pre-eminence. When, therefore, I find the inspired Apostle saying to his son Timothy,'^ *'If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work" — I had almost said that if there were no other text in the Bible declaring against Prelacy, this alone would convince me that it was contrary to the mind of Christ. For, if we interpret the word, "bishop" in this place to mean, what Presbyterians say it means, the pastoral or ministerial office; — an office of great labour and self-denial; then the whole passage conveys an idea, the seasonableness and importance of which is obvious to every one, and the consistency of which with the rest of the Epistle, and with the spirit of the New Testament, is equally obvious. But if, by this title, we are to understand an office of pre-eminent rank and authority, above that of the ordinary authorized dispensers of the Word and Sacra- ments ; no gloss, it appears to me, can prevent our mak- ing the Apostle Paul a favourer of ambition and aspiring in the holy ministry. He surely meant to encourage a "desire" for the office of a "bishop;" nay, an earnest and eager desire, as the original word undoubtedly signifiesj a desire like that of a hungry person to obtain food. But if this be an office of pre-eminent ecclesiastical rank, as our Prelatical brethren say it is, then, undoubtedly, Paul, upon this construction, encourages every Presbyter eagerly to covet the place of his diocesan. On this supposition the inspired Apostle is set at variance with himself, in many other parts of his Epistles ; at variance with his brother * 1 Timothy iii. 1. ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 187 Apostle, John^ who strongly censures one who "loved to have the pre-eminence" in the Church; at variance with his Master, who, on so many occasions, reprobated all aspiring after mastership, or priority of place among his ministers; and, indeed, at variance with the whole spirit of the Gospel. It is by no means contended that the exercise of indivi- dual ambition is either necessarily, or in fact, precluded by the adoption of Presbyterian parity in the holy ministry. This spirit is found, in a greater or less degree, wherever there are men. But, as the constitution of our truly primi- tive and apostolic Church, precludes all official inequality of rank among pastors, their ambition can only take the turn of aspiring to be more learned, more pious, more dili- gent, and more conspicuously and extensively useful in the same office. An ambition which, in many cases, may be, no doubt, sadly unhallowed; but which is, surely, less dis- honourable and corrupting in its influence, than that which exhausts itself in canvassing for titles, chief seats, and emo- luments; and which is tempted, of course, to be most intent on the culture of those personal qualities which are most favourable to the attainment of official precedence. Having endeavoured to show the real nature of that ecclesiastical polity which the Scriptures warrant, by point- ing out, in detail, its essential features, and the specific purposes which it ought to be, and must be intended, and adequate to answer ; let us now see whether we do not find the apostolic churches actually exercising their eccle- siastical power, in the very cases and for the very pur- poses which have been specified. If so, the testimony is irresistible, that we have not misapprehended or misapplied the foregoing principles. 188 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. We find ministers of the sanctuary, then, in various parts of the New Testament, distinguished by titles which plainly imply that they were invested with authority for the benefit of the Church, which they were bound to exer- cise in the fear of God, and under a deep sense of account- ability to the great "Shepherd and Bishop of souls." They are called "rulers" in the house of God; "shepherds over the flock;" "stewards of the mysteries of God;" "over- seers;" "ambassadors of Christ;" * — all implying office in the Church; — all implying a delegated power, to be exer- cised for the edification of that spiritual body of which He who "sits as King upon the holy hill of Zion''' is the sov- ereign Head. Further : the Apostles, again and again, exhort the churches to which they wrote to "obey them that had the rule over them, and to submit themselves," re- membering that those rulers "watched for their souls as they that must give account."! Our blessed Saviour him- self, in giving direction to his disciples respecting offences, evidently authorizes the Church, by her proper officers, after due inquiry and evidence, to pass a judicial sentence against incorrisrible offenders, cutting them off" from the fellowship and privileges of the Christian body. J In con- formity with this direction, the actual exercise of ecclesias- tical power in the excision of the heretical and the immoral from the Apostolic Church, is expressly and repeatedly recorded. In several cases the Apostles enjoin that those who denied the fundamental doctrines of the Gospel, so as to preach "another gospel," should be refused admission to the Church; or, if already admitted, excluded from its * Rom. xii. 8. 1 Tim. iii. 4. 1 FtUr v. 1—3. 1 Cor. iv. 1. 1 Peter iv. 10. Acts XX. 28. 2 Cor. v. 20. t Hth. xiii. 17. 1 Thtas. v. 12. 1 Matt, xviii. 15—19. ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 189 privileges. " The man that is an heretic, after the first and second admonition, reject." "Now I beseech you, bre- thren, mark them which cause divisions and offences, con- trary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them." ''If any man preach any other Gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed." "Who- soever transgresseth and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God-speed: — for he that biddeth him God- speed is partaker of his evil deeds."* Equally undoubted are the examples of judicial censure and exclusion from the Church on account of corruption in practice. In the Church of Corinth, the rulers are directed to assemble, and authoritatively to cast out of their communion a man who had fallen into gross immorality. "Wherefore put away from among yourselves," says the inspired Apostle, "that wicked person." And again, in writing to the Thes- salonians, the same Apostle directs — "If any man obey not our word by this Epistle, note that man, and have no company with him, that he may be ashamed."* The New Testament, moreover, abounds with directions con- cerning the proper character, the choice, and the ordina- tion of Church officers ; prescribing those qualifications without which they ought not to be admitted to office; and committing to the rulers of the Ciiurch the arduous duty of judging of these qualifications, rejecting the unworthy, and presiding over the choice and investure of those whom they approved. And, to crown all, we have an example in the Apostolic Church of a Synodical Assembly, brought * Titus iii. 10. Rom. xvi. 17. Gal. i. 9. 2 John 9, 10, 11. 1 1 Cor. V. 1—15. 2 Tkess. iii. 14. 190 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. together, not by the civil government, but by ecclesiastical men, for deciding matters of great importance, in the name, and for the benefit of the whole Church. I refer to the Synod of Jeriisahm,* formed by "the Apostles and Elders," convened in that place, who decided the ques- tion concerning Jewish observances, so interesting at that time, which had been sent up for consideration from Jin- tioch. And, what is no less remarkable, having authorita- tively decided, they transmitted their judgment, under the name of ^^decrees,'' to be recorded and observed by all the Churches. In a word, ecclesiastical rulers are represented, throughout the New Testament, as entrusted with "the keys of the kingdom of God," that is, with authority in the visible Church; with the power of <' binding and loos- ing," in the name of the King of Zion; with the power of superintending all the affairs of the Church, as such; of judicially directing what appears to be for edification; and seeing that all things be done decently and in order." Such is the nature of that spiritual government which the Church is authorized to maintain. Our next inquiry is, II. What are the limits of that authority which belongs to the Church? And in determining these, we shall be aided essentially by keeping in mind that nature and design of this autho- rity which we have already endeavoured to ascertain. For we may rest assured that the Church has no superfluous power ; no power beyond what is absolutely necessary for the attainment of those great moral purposes for which she was formed by her divine Master. And, 1. The Church can have no authority over any but her. * Acta XV. ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 191 own members. There have been periods indeed, in which an encroaching, tyrannical Church claimed universal do- minion; when she arrogated to herself the power to set up and put down whom she would; when she undertook to dispose of crowns and kingdoms at pleasure; and to make kings and emperors bow before her with ignoble homage. I need not say, that this was most presumptuous usurpa- tion; contrary to reason and Scripture; and adapted to des- troy the Church of God in her appropriate character. It follows, from the very nature and design of the Church, that she can have no authority beyond her own pale. And it was, no doubt, because she so frequently transgressed this rule, in former times, that so many adopted, without due examination, the principle before noticed, that <'a government cannot exist within a government." If the Church had not so often transcended her proper limits, this principle would never have occurred to a thinking mind. Be it remembered, then, that she can judge only those who are "within" her bosom. To those who are <' with- out," she may send missionaries. She may instruct, invite, and persuade them to come in, and accept of her privileges; but until they comply with her invitation, and become her members, she has no right to extend to them her appropri- ate authority. 2. Again; the Church has no power to control, even her own members, iii any other concerns than those which relate to their moral and spiritual interests. She has no right to interfere with their political opinions; with their domestic relations; or with any department of their secular pursuits. As long as they infringe no law of Christ's kingdom, it is no part of her sacred trust to call in question or censure their course. It cannot be too fre- 28 192 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. quently repeated, or too constantly remembered, that Christ's "kingdom is not of this world," and can never authorize its rulers to be "judges and dividers" in the tem- poral concerns of men. Yet if a member of the Christian Church, in the course of his political conflicts, or his pro- fessional avocations, be visibly and palpably chargeable vvrith a departure from purity, either in faith or practice, it is incumbent on the Church to call him to an account; not for his political partialities, or his secular employments, but solely for his moral delinquency. 3. Further; the Church has no power to hold in a state of inspection and discipline, even her own members any longer than they choose to submit to her authority. I am not now speaking of the right of these members in the sight of the divine and heart-searching Head of the Church. No doubt, all who depart from the body of his professing people, and refuse to submit to the just and scrip- tural authority of his sacred household, commit sin against him ; and, however lightly they may think of it, will be held accountable at his bar for their disobedience. But still the Church has no means, and ought not to claim the power, of compelling any to remain under her "oversight" and authority an hour longer than their judgment and their conscience dispose them to remain. He that will depart, must be allowed to depart. The Church can only follow him with her tears, her prayers, and her parental censure. 4. Closely allied to this, or rather involved in this, is another limit to the power of the Church; and that is, that the highest penalty she can inflict upon any one, however aggravated his offence, is exclusion from her co7nmu- nion. She can'exact no pecuniary fine. She can inflict no corporeal pains or penalties. She cannot confiscate the ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 193 property, or incarcerate the person, or touch a hair of the head, of the most obstinate offender. When she has shut him out from her fellowship, in other words, disowned him as a Christian brother, she has done the utmost that she has a right to do. Her power is exhausted. 5. Intunately connected with the foregoing, is the last principle of limitation which I shall mention, which is, that the power of ecclesiastical rulers is strictly ministerial: that is, they have only the power, as servants, of commu- nicating ivhat the Master has taught them, and of do- ing what the Master has commanded them. They de- rive their power, not from the people whom they serve, and whom they represent, but from Christ, the King and Head of the Church. In his name they come. By his authority they speak and act. Their commission is " Teach them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you." ''Preach the preaching that I bid thee." "Hear the word at my mouth, and give them warning from me." Their office is "is ^ministry, not a dominion.'' Teachers and rulers have, of course, no right to prescribe terms of communion which the Bible does not warrant ; no right to denounce or condemn any thing which the Bible does not condemn; no right to enjoin that which the Bible does not enjoin. Like ambassadors at a foreign court, they cannot go one jot or tittle beyond their instructions. I am not ignorant, indeed, that ecclesiastical bodies, calling them- selves Churches of Christ, have often set up other standards, both of faith and practice. Tradition, the Fathers, general Councils, and the judgment of the Church, have all been prescribed as authoritative guides both to truth and order. Every thing of this kind is an invasion of Christ's supremacy in his Church, and a practical denial of the suffi- 194 SPRUCE STREET I-ECTURES. ciency of the Scriptures as the great code of laws of his kingdom. It is not maintained, indeed, that there must necessarily be a direct scriptural warrant for every minor detail of ecclesiastical polity. But it is maintained, that for every leading, governing feature in the system, there must be the warrant of either scriptural precept, or scrip- tural example. And, above all, it is maintained, as a radi- cal principle on this subject, that nothing can ever be law- fully made a term of communion for which a warrant from the Word of God cannot be produced. It remains that we consider III. The legitimate and scriptural End of Church government. The great end of all good government is the benefit of the community over which it is exercised. For this pur- pose it was instituted at first by the Governor of the world; and to this end ought its whole administration, in all cases, to be supremely directed. Tyrants in the state, indeed, have taught, and acted upon the principle, that the great end of all civil government is the aggrandizement of a few at the expense of the many. Of course, they supposed that the grand design was most successfully accomplished, when the rulers were most enriched and honoured, and the ruled kept in the most abject and unresisting subjection. And it is deeply to be deplored that the same principle has been too often adopted, if not avowedly, yet really, by bodies calling themselves Churches of Christ. Hence the ecclesiastical exactions and edicts to which hood-winked and infatuated millions have so often, in past ages, and so long submitted. Hence the haughty Papal " bulls" and « interdicts," by which kings, and even kingdoms have ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 195 been frequently made to tremble. Nothing can be more opposite than these things to the spirit and law of the Re- deemer. The "authority" which the inspired Apostle claims for the rulers of the Church, he represents as "given for edification and not for destruction."* Not for the pur- pose of creating and pampering classes of privileged orders, to "Lord it over God's heritage;" not to build up a sys- tem of polity which may minister to the pride, the cupidi- ty, or the voluptuousness of an ambitious priesthood; not to form a body under the title of clergy^ with separate in- terests from the laity, and making the latter mere ma- chines and submissive instruments of the former. All this is as wicked at it is unreasonable. No office, no power is authorized by Jesus Christ in his Church, but that which is necessary to the instruction, the purity, the edification, and the happiness of the whole body. All legitimate govern- ment, here, as well as elsewhere, is to be considered as a means, not an end: not as instituted for the purpose of acquiring dominion over the bodies, the minds, or the property of men; but for promoting their temporal and eternal welfare: and as no further resting on divine autho- rity than as it is adapted to propagate and maintain the truth, to restrain vice, to secure the order and well-being of society, and to build up the great family of those who profess the true religion, in knowledge, peace, and holi- ness, unto salvation. Accordingly, the divine Founder of our religion him- self tells us that he "came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many;" not to gratify himself, but to obey, and suffer, and die, that he * 2 Cor. X. 8. 106 SPRUCE* STREET LECTURES. might "seek and save that which was lost."* And, in conformity with this declaration, the inspired Apostle, who had drunk deep into the spirit of his Master, declares, *'We preach, not ourselves, but Ciirist Jesus the Lord, and ourselves your servants for Jesus sake. " And again : ^'Not for that we have dominion over your faith, but are helpers of your joy." And again: "All things," says the same Apostle, addressing himself to the body of a Chris- tian Church — " all things are yours, whether Paul., ovJipol- los, or Cephas, all are yours." And again : "Who is Paul and who is Jlpollos, but ministers by whom ye believ- ed, as the Lord gave to every man ?" Accordingly, the same inspired man reminds his son Timothy, and com- mands him to teach, that " the servants of the Lord must not strive, but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient, in meekness instructing those who oppose themselves, if, peradventure, God will give them repentance to the ac- knowledging of the truth." Accordingly, in pleading be- fore king Agrippa, he declares that the great design of the Saviour in sending gospel ministers to the children of men, is, to " open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to lio-ht, and from the power of Satan to God, that they might receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified, by faith in Jesus Christ." And when he tells the Ephesian Church for what purpose apostles, evangelists, pastors and teachers were sent forth, he de- clares it was not for any purpose of self-aggrandizement, but "for the perfecting of the saints, for the edifying of the body of Christ; till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect * Matt. XX. 28. Luie. xix. 10. ^ ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 197 man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ."* This subject, my friends, however dry and speculative it may have appeared to some of my hearers, is all practical. It enters more deeply into the daily walk and duties of the Christian life, than is commonly supposed. Suffer me, then, to trespass a little longer on your patience by stating, and recommending to your attention some of the many practical inferences which may be naturally drawn from the subject. And, 1. From what has been said, it is evident that Church government is a very important m,eans of grace. To many, I know, this whole subject appears unimportant, if not repulsive. They are apt to consider and represent all exercise of ecclesiastical authority, and especially the discipline of the Church, which is nothing more than the application of the Church's authority, as an officious and offensive intermeddling with Christian liberty. But I need not say to those who take their views of ecclesiastical polity from the Bible, and from the best experience, that it is not only important, but absolutely essential to the purity and edification of the body of Christ. It ought, undoubtedly, to be regarded as one of the most precious means of grace, by which offenders are humbled, softened, and brought to repentance; by which the Church is purged of unworthy members; offences removed; the honour of religion pro- moted; the office of the Chrisian ministry regulated and "magnified;" real Christians stimulated and guided in their spiritual course, faithful testimony borne against error * 2 Cor. iv. 5. i. 24. 1 Cor. iii. 22. 1 Cor. iii. 5. 2 Tim. ii. 24. 25. Acts xxvi. 18. Ephes. iv. 2. 1>98 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. and crime; and the professing family of Christ rescmed from disgrace, and made to appear orderly and beautiful in the view of the world. The truth is, the faithful mainte- nance of Church discipline; in other words, the exercise of a faithful watch and care among Christians, over the pu- rity of each other, in doctrine, worship and life, is so im- portant a part of the purpose for which the Church was founded, that we may say with confidence, she cannot flourish, as to her best interests, without it. It may be safely affirmed, that a large part of all that is holy in the Church, at the present day, either in faith or practice, may be ascribed, under God, as really to sound ecclesiastical discipline, as to the faithful preaching of the Gospel. No matter how many precious plants may be introduced into "the garden of the Lord," or how much time and labour may be expended in endeavouring to fertilize the soil, and to apply to it the most skilful and diligent culture: if there be no fence kept up to defend the whole from intruders, all culture will be vain; every beast of the field will devour it; and what ought to be a beautiful and productive inclo- sure, will be a barren and dreary common. 2. If the foregoing representation be correct, then the plenary and constant exercise of ecclesiastical autho- rity is not usurpation, but simple obedience to Christ. There is extreme sensitiveness on this subject in the minds of many, who profess to be zealous for the " rights of con- science." They believe, and sometimes very clamorously assert, that all ecclesiastical censure on any one, for any moral delinquency, and especially for any departure from the true faith, is an interference with the prerogative of God, who alone is ''Lord of the conscience." But if Christ, the divine Head of the Church, has solemnly en- ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 199 joined on his professing people the exercise of this autho- rity, and the faithful infliction of this censure, there is surely an end of all controversy on the part of those who acknowledge the Scriptures to be the only infallible rule of faith and practice. Suppose the proprietor of a beautiful and valuable garden to have committed it to the entire care of servants, formally chosen and commissioned for that purpose. Suppose the master to have given them a strict and repeated charge, carefully to exclude from it all mischievous intruders, and as soon as possible to banish those who had improperly made their way into the inclo- sure. And suppose, when these servants faithfully obeyed their orders, any one were to denounce them as usurping power, and as presumptuously interfering with the liberty of their neighbours. What would be thought of the charge? Would it not be regarded as the most preposter- ous that could be conceived? Every one must see, in a moment, that if the servants had not done exactly as they did, they would have been liable to the charge of unfaith- fulness and gross disobedience. Precisely so is it in the case before us. The command of Christ, to his commis- sioned servants, to watch over, rule, and guard the Church committed to their care; and to exclude from it all those whose principles or practice are manifestly hostile to its great design; is plain, repeated, and decisive. Can it be for a moment doubted, then, that when they obey this command, they are so far from usurping power, that a fail- ure to obey it, strictly and faithfully, would be an act of direct rebellion against Him who is '' Head over all things for the Church?" 3. From what has been said, it is plain, that every de- parture from the essential principles of Gospel order, 29 200 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. will be likely to exert an unhappy influence on the best interests of the Church, and may be productive of the most iiijurious effects. It is the habit of many to speak of the established rules of ecclesiastical order, with sneer and contempt, as if they were cold and spiritless forms, the observance of which is rather adapted to repress and. hin- der, than to promote the real life, the spiritual prosperity of the Church. Unless the preacher is greatly deceived, a more erroneous estimate was never made. There is no doubt, indeed, that there may be much pompous and rigid adherence to ecclesiastical form, where there is little or no life. And there is as little doubt that the rigour of Church order may be maintained at the expense of more vital inter- ests. But the question is, — will the garden of the Lord be likely to flourish when its fences are broken down; when not only old, but important landmarks are disregard- ed; when rules of order, as wise as they have been long established, are set at nought? Can there be a moments' doubt what answer ought to be given to this question? "God is not the author of confusion, but of peace and order in all the Churches." Let no one imagine, then, that he will be likely to render God service, or permanently to build up the Redeemer's kingdom, by violating the order of his house; for example, by giving encouragement to "lay-preach- ing;" by favouring the introduction into the ministry of men with talents adapted to dazzle as meteors, but destitute of sound principles, and other prescribed qualifications; by vio- lating wholesome scriptural rules, for the purpose of either favouring a friend, or opposing an adversary; by giving countenance to proceedings manifestly disorderly, for the purpose of carrying a point, or with the hope of gaining some temporary advantage; or by adopting measures in the ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 201 public service of the sanctuary, better fitted to inflate or intoxicate, than to enlighten the understanding, convince the conscience, or impress the heart. It is in ecclesiastical affairs, as all wise men acknowledge it to be in civil life, a single departure from some important principle of regu- larity, may lead, directly or indirectly, to mischievous consequences, of which a whole generation may not see the end. Such deviations may appear to do good for a while; but the appearance is delusive. Like the excitement of strong drink, they may stimulate, and even appear to strengthen, for a short time; but they only prepare the way for increased weakness and disease in the issue. It were unwise, indeed, to insist on adhering to form at the expense of substance; but it were equally unwise to cherish the hope, that the substance will long be retained, when form is abandoned. The instructions of history on this subject are most ample and decisive. 4. A further inference from what has been said is obvi- ous and irresistible, viz : that the Presbyterian form of ecclesiastical polity is manifestly, and by far, best adapted to strengthen, purify, and build up the Church of Christ. If uniformity of faith, order, and worship, among all the Churches which bear the same denomination, and profess to walk by the same rules, be of real impor- tance; if the maintenance of enlightened and faithful dis- cipline, be essential to the purity and genuine health of the body of Christ ; and if that ecclesiastical polity which shall be adapted to answer the great purposes for which the Church was founded, must be such as will authoritatively bind all the Churches which profess to receive it, in one com- pact and homogeneous body; then it is manifest that no other form than the Presbyterian is adapted to attain all ''i^- 202 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. the purposes, and secure all the advantages which the gov- ernment of the Church was intended by the Master to pro- mote. In saying this, I have no desire to denounce, or even to depreciate, the forms of government preferred by other denominations of our fellow Christians. With the utmost cordiality can I adopt as my own the language of the framers of our excellent ecclesiastical Constitution, when they say, "We embrace in the spirit of charity those Christians who differ from us, in opinion or in prac- tice, on these subjects." This, however, is perfectly re- concileable with the conviction, that one form of ecclesias- tical government is more scriptural, and better adapted to promote good order, purity, and edification than another. On the one hand, to speak with frankness, we have no doubt that a Church formed on the plan of our Episcopal brethren, may be a true Church of Christ, and may be, and has been blessed to the evei-lasting welfare of many souls. Yet we are persuaded, that the peculiar features of that system, besides having no foundation in the word of God, are by no means adapted to the maintenance of a scriptural discipline in the Church, and, indeed, scarcely compatible with it. On the other hand, we are as perfectly confident that the plan of our Independent brethren, and, to a con- siderable extent, that of our Congregational brethren, is no less materially defective as a means of promoting the unity, and the efficient and authoritative co-operation of all the Churches of the same nominal communion. It obviously leaves them entirely powerless in regard to many points, which it would seem no friend of ecclesiastical order can deem of small importance. In both these respects, as well as in many others which might be specified, the Presbyte- rian system is, at once, liberal and efficient; in the highest ¥■ ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 203 degree friendly to the claims of Christian liberty; and yet adapted to maintain the purest discipline, and the most en- tire harmony and energetic co-operation of the whole body. Much depends, it must be acknowledged, on the spirit with which this system is borne forward. For, although I am not prepared to adopt, in all its extent, in reference to ecclesiastical government, the sentiment which is so often repeated as an admitted maxim, that "that which is best administered is best," yet I am free to acknowledge, that the Presbyterian form of government and discipline may be administered with so little of the spirit of charity, and of zeal for the glory of God, and the extension of the Redeemer's kingdom, as to make it little more than a course of vexa- tious and unedifying litigation. But this is only saying, that the infirmity and corruption of man may sometimes mar the beauty, and invalidate the efiicacy of the best pro- visions of a benevolent God. Some adequate and adapted impelling power is necessary to set the most perfect ma- chine in motion. And when the vital spirit of the religion of Christ is present and active, here is the noblest plan of machinery in the world with which it can operate. Where this spirit habitually governs, there is no other plan of ec- clesiastical polity so well adapted as the Presbyterian to se- cure order; to promote peace; to accomplish every thing with fraternal counsel and deliberation; to maintain impar- tial and equitable discipline, at once over ministers and private members; to secure the rights of the people; to protect pastors from injury and oppression; to guard, on the one hand, against the intrusions of laymen into the functions of the clergy, and, on the other, against the en- croachments of clerical ambition; to promote uniformity of doctrine and worship; to afibrd redress in every species 204 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. of difficulty; to bring the state and proceedings of every part of the Church under the distinct and official review of the whole; and to enable the whole to act together as one body, under the authority and guidance of a common head. Are these things desirable? are they really important to the greatest strength and purity of the body? If so, I will be bold to say, they can be fully attained only by that form of ecclesiastical polity under which ive are so happy as to live. 5. From the view which has been given of this subject, it is plain that diversity informs of Church government ought not to interfere with the com,munion of saints. As ''Christ is not divided;" as there is but "one Christ;" so all who are really united by faith to Him who is "the Head of all principality and power," are "one body in Him, and every one members one of another." We all grant, that among individual Christians there may be "di- versities of operation," that is great variety in the order, intensity, and aspect of those exercises which mark the entrance as well as the progress of the divine life; — and yet that "it is the same spirit which worketh in all." Why may there not be a similar variety in the modes of organi- zation adopted by ecclesiastical bodies, without destroying their ecclesiastical character? While, therefore, the great im- portance of the subject of ecclesiastical polity is maintained; and while we may safely assert, that no material departure from the scriptural order of the Church can ever occur with- out subjecting those who are guilty of it to a serious disadvan- tage; let us guard against the mistake of those who place it among ihe fundamentals of our holy religion. This, it is ap- prehended, is an entire and mischievous mistake. The holy Scriptures manifestly do not, like some ecclesiastical men, of ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 205 narrow views, and of more zeal than knowledge, cut off from the "covenanted mercies of God" those who reject a certain favourite form of church government; — but only those who reject the Gospel of Christ. We undoubtedly sin against the great Head of the Church, when we consider and treat as a matter of indifference that which he has ap- pointed ; but we may be considered as equally sinning against Him, and against "the generation of the righteous," when we attempt to place the external order of the Church among those things on which its vital character depends; on which the exercise of Jehovah's mercy is suspended. 6. If what has been said be correct, it is evident that an honest attachment to a particular form of ecclesiastical order, does not, necessarily, deserve the nam,e of high- church and sectarian bigotry. There is a strong tenden- cy, at the present day, to stigmatize with these epithets every thing that indicates a marked preference to any one denomination of Christians. If a book be written, or a plan formed for recommending any particular portion of the Christian community, as, in the estimation of the author, more conformed to Scripture, and more worthy of adoption than others, it is immediately denounced, as a "high- church" book; as an illiberal, "sectarian" plan. Nor are any more disposed to utter, and clamorously to urge this denunciation, than those who, under the pretence of a most expanded "charity," are far more exclusive and intolerant in contending for some opposite peculiarity. None are more severe on bigots and bigotry, than the most intensely bigoted. But can any thing be more unreasonable and unjust? If the visible Church exist at all, it must be organ- ized in some particular form: and it is manifest that all forms of Church order cannot be equally agreeable to Scrip- 206 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. ture. Some one is, of course, nearer to the primitive model than the rest. And if any one honestly believes this to be the case, with the form with which he is particularly connected, and prefers, and endeavours to recommend this form accordingly; provided he do it without uncharitable- ness, and with due respect to the opinions of others, who has a right to complain? Surely to censure him for this course, is to abridge, instead of maintaining, Christian liberty. The truth is, the sincere and intelligent inquirer must prefer one form of faith and order to others. If he proclaim this preference with bitterness and rancour ; if he assail those who cannot agree with him with unsparing de- nunciation; if he exhibit himself as a " fiery, controversial zealot, who can see no evil in his own party, and no good out of it;" let the terms "high-churchman," "bigot," "sectarian," be heaped upon him without reserve. He richly deserves them all. But, if he meekly and humbly obey those convictions of duty which he considers the Bible as warranting ; if he lay no more stress upon modes of faith, and forms of order than the Bible lays upon them; if he, not merely in words, but practically, allow to others the same liberty which he claims for himself; and if he look with unfeigned and equal affection upon all who bear the image of Christ, whether they belong to his own de- nomination or not; — such an one, whatever opprobrious epithets the latitudinarian, or he who is " fierce for mode- ration" may heap upon him, has little reason to fear the abuse of men. Those who would call such an one "bigot," or " sectarian," would, undoubtedly, if they had lived in the first century, have applied the same appellation to the Sa- viour himself and his inspired Apostles. 7. From the foregoing discussion it is manifest, that all ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 207 alliance between the Church and the civil government, is unscriptural, and replete with mischief of the most serious kind. It is unscriptural ; contrary alike to the letter and the spirit of the New Testament; and, therefore, solemnly forbidden. It is unhallowed in its origin, the offspring of priestcraft, or statecraft, or both, and, of course, entitled to no countenance from the real friends of the Church of Christ. And its tendency and effects are in all cases injurious; necessarily and universally injurious. All civil establishments of religion, then, ought to be op- posed to the utmost by those who wish well to the cause of Zion. Whatever may be their form, or the degree of their rigour ; whether they are intended to operate by force, by fear, or by bribery; whether we consider them as "a tax on error," or as "a bounty on faith;" as a legal pro- vision for instructing the people in what the civil magis- trate, (who may be an infidel or a gross heretic) chooses to say is truth; or as a convenient engine in the hands of gov- ernment for reaching and controlling the popular mind; in all cases they are corrupt in their principles, and perni- cious in their influence ; and adapted to generate and en- courage hypocrisy ; to degrade the Christian ministry ; to make the care of souls an affair of secular merchandize; and to prostrate the Church of God, with all its officers and ordinances, at the feet of worldly politicians. Such have bee?! the effects of religious establishments from the days of Constantine to the present hour ; and such will be their effects as long as human nature remains what it now is. Every friend of Christ, then, ought to recoil with instinc- tive dread and horror from every attempt to support reli- gion, in any form, by law. Nay, they ought to recoil from every attempt, on the part of the civil government, 30 208 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. to interpose in the least degree in the affairs of the Church, even to help her. All experience has shown that it is less, far less, injurious lo the Church to be persecuted by the State, than to be pampered by her caresses, and laden with her treasures. 8. A further practical inference from our subject is, that the trust committed to Church rulers is in the highest degree weighty and solemn. To conduct the momentous affairs of the Christian Society, in which so many interests, divine and human, temporal and eternal, are involved ; to sit in judgment in cases in which doctrine and order, Christian character and Christian peace and edification are all deeply concerned} toadminister the laws of Christ with fidelity, and yet with prudence; with proper zeal for Gospel purity, and at the same time with a sacred regard to the Church's peace; surely requires all the wisdom, and all the grace that mor- tals can exercise. The trust committed to civil rulers is, no doubt, in a high degree important and arduous; and will be felt to be so by every thinking man. But to the eccle- siastical ruler are committed interests unspeakably more momentous; which put in requisition all the sagacity, discre- tion, meekness, benevolence, and zeal for the honour of Zion's King, which belong to the most intelligent and de- voted Christian; and in the view of which, he who sus- tains the trust, ought, with unceasing solicitude, to implore divine aid and guidance. Into this sacred inclosure, preju- dice, passion, partiality, rashness, or unhallowed feelings of any kind, ought never to be permitted to enter. The grand, and only leading question to be asked, as a guide to duty, is, not what course will tend most effectually to build up this party, or to defeat that adversary ; but what course will be most likely to promote the purity, the harmony, ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 209 and the edification of tlie Church of God? This is a camp in which every banner that is raised, save that of the Re- deemer's glory, ought to be held in the deepest abhorrence. Here, if ever, the tribunal of conscience ought to be con- sulted with the most sacred vigilance, and the Slatiie Book of the Master's kingdom studied with unceasinsf diligence. 9. Another plain inference from all that has been said, is, that it is incumbent 07i professing Christians to make themselves acquainted ivit h the subject of Church govern- ment. Is every professing Christian a member of that body called the Visible Church ? Does he bear, of course, intimate and most important relations to that body? And has he, consequently, important duties to that body every day devolving upon him ? Can it be necessary, then, to demonstrate, that he ought to know something of the na- ture and structure of this body; to understand, in some good measure, the constitution and laws under which it is not only authorized, but required to act; and the various obligations resting upon its officers and its members ? It were an insult, my friends, to your understandings, to attempt to reason on a point so perfectly self-evident. As well might I consider it as necessary formally to demon- strate, that a member of civil society ought to understand enousih of the government under which he lives, to enable CO ' him intelligently to discharge the duties of a good citizen, and to avoid violating the law of the land? I have no doubt, indeed, that a man may be a real Christian, who is in a great measure ignorant of the subject on which I have been addressing you this evening. But a tvise and intelligent Christian he cannot be. A Christian ready to j)^'^ceivc, to appreciate, and to discharge the various duties which he owes to his Master in heaven, to his brethren of the Church, 210 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. and to his own best edification, he cannot be. And the only wonder is, that so many professing Christians who would be ashamed of ignorance on a thousand other subjects, of far less importance, are willing, on this subject, to remain profoundly ignorant. Such persons, however sincere and devout, ought to know thatt hey are in^danger every hour, when they undertake to speak or*a^' in reference to this subject, of giving a touch to the Ark of God, the character and effect of which, if they understood the subject, they would deprecate in their inmost souls. Many a real Chris- tian, from ignorance of the very elementary principles of this subject, has spoken and acted in such a way as to in- flict wounds on the Church of God which no subsequent regret or tears could ever heal. 10. Thelast inference with which I shall tax your patience, is one which, in closing, I must respectfully and affection- ately beg all my hearers to remember and lay to heart. It is, that a man may be j)erfectly sound on the subject of Church government, and yet be utterly defective as to the essentials of Christian character. There has been a tendency among those who called themselves Christians, in every age, to attempt a kind of commutation with God for that which his word requires; to substitute rites and forms for the religion of the heart; to cry out with confi- dence, "The temple of the Lord, the temple of the Lord are we," while their hearts were going forth after covetous- ness or sensuality. Hence that fury of zeal for an ecclesiasti- cal name and connexion on which many appear to rely as a passport to heaven. Against this fatal mistake, my beloved friends, I desire to warn you. It is a mistake not confined to any particular denomination; and a mistake as insidious and dangerous as it is prevalent. It is more than possible ECCLESIASTICAL POLITY. 211 that a caution, in connexion with the subject which we are now considering, may be neither unseasonable, nor useless. Be entreated, then, my friends, to lay no stress whatever, as to the great question of your acceptance with God, on the correctness of your opinions and practice as to Church gov- ernment. In the religion of Jesus Christ, as in other mat- ters, there are outworks, and there are vital parts. Real Christianity may exist without the former, but not without the latter. With respect to the former, you may be per- fectly fair and faultless ; while, in respect to the latter, you may be as " whited sepulchres. " It is my earnest desire to see you well informed, intelligent, thorough Pesbyteriansj because I verily believe, as before stated, that this form of ecclesiastical government is more closely conformed to the Apostolic model than any other ; and better fitted, by far, than any other, to promote all the great ends of government in the Church of Christ. But I beseech you to remember, that you may be zealous Presbyterians, and yet 7iot real Christians. You may contend strenuously and ably for those outward forms which Christ has established in his Church, and retain every one of them with scrupulous exactness; and yet be strangers to that "Spirit without which we "are none of his." Let no one, then, who de- sires to see the face of God in peace, rest in forms of eccle- siastical order, however scriptural. They are important in their place; but they are not that "holiness without which no man shall see the Lord." They are useful as means, but they are not the foundation of that "hope which maketh not ashamed." While, therefore, we neglect no- thing which Christ has revealed; let our first and highest attention be directed to that regeneration of the heart, by which alone we can be " made meet for the inheritance of 212 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. the saints in light;" and to that vital union by faith and love to the blessed Saviour, which alone can give us an in- terest in his atoning blood, and a title to eternal life. With- out the sanctifying and justifying power of that blood, no man is a Christian. To this great foundation of Gospel hope, then, be entreated, every one of you, my beloved brethren, first of all, and above all, to turn your eyes and your hearts. Here rest. Here live. Here rejoice, in holy hope of "the glory that shall be revealed." And to Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, our God, and our father's God, be glory forever! Amen! SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. LECTURE VIII. Delivered on the Evening of the 20th May, 1832, by the Rev. Samuel Martin, D. D. of Chanceford, Pa. ON REGENERATION. Therefore, if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new. 2 Cor. v. 17. Paul and his fellow apostles, as the Master whom they served, were constantly exposed to the reproach and hatred of the enemies of the cross. Their zeal was regarded as fanatic, their eloquence as pompous display, to attract no- tice and procure applause. Their success excited suspi- cion, and exposed them to unspeakable malice. The pu- rity of their lives, their disinterested labours, and their ex- tensive charity, instead of procuring esteem, heated public resentment. To whatever quarter they turned their eyes, causes of trouble and perplexity arose before them; deaths and dangers stared upon them. Did these things move them? Did they retard their motion, or drive them from their course? Instead of this, they rejoiced "that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for the sake of Christ." The entreaties of friends enforced with tears, and the ter- rors of death in joint array, could not stay the progress of Paul on his journey to Jerusalem, though he well knew that 31 216 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. " bonds and imprisonment awaited him." "What mean ye," says he, *« to weep and to break my heart ? for I am ready, not be bound only, but also to die at Jerusalem, for the name of the Lord Jesus." Nor were these the vauntings of a desperado, nor the ebullitions of an overheated imagination; but the composed and well digested resolutions of a soul devoted to the will of Christ, and "strong to do ex- ploits," in his service. But this fortitude, this devotion to Christ, did not spring from any resources common to man. They were not the attainments of native greatness, improved and cherished in the most favoured schools of science or experience. They arose out of a depression of all these, and the possession of a spirit akin to that which pertained es- sentially to the Master whom they served. Their pure, and sublime addresses, their self-denying and heavenly conver- sation, clearly proved that they were born from above. He that had created them at first, had created them anew. They were in Christ Jesus. They were new creatures! New creatures, in a new world. "Old things were passed away, behold all things were become new." Nor was this peculiar to Paul and his fellow apostles : " For, if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature." To be in Christ, involves every thing, immediately or remotely, that is or can be important to man. It implies an interest in his vicarious righteousness, through a cordial acceptance of it for all the purposes for which he fulfilled it, and for all the ends of its imputation. To be in Christ, supposes union with Christ, by which union the sinner is made one with Christ in reckoning: of law, and so, by the obedience of Christ his Surety, account- ed his, he is delivered from condemnation. "For there is no condemnation to them that are in Christ Jesus j for the law ON REGENERATION. 217 of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus, hath made them free from the law of sin and death." To be in Christ, implies the possession of the Spirit of Christ; of whom the Saviour says to his disciples, "that he dwelleth with you, and- shall be in you." For this, be- lievers are called 'Uemples of God." "Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwell- eth in you." To be in Christ, implies an alliance to Christ so inti- mate, that all the supplies of the spiritual life are derived from him, and that this life is entirely dependent upon him for its maintenance. " Because I live," said the Saviour to his disciples, "ye shall live also." And this view is in ex- act accordance with Paul's experience. "1 live, yet not I, but Christ liveth in me." And does light dwell with dark- ness? Does love enclasp enmity in its bosom? Does holiness entwine herself around the filthy, deformed, and loathsome monster sin ? Not at all: "If any man be in Christ, he is a new creature." The God of grace prepares the human heart for his reception. He builds for himself a new temple. He sweeps and garnishes it, and takes possession. The regeneration or new creation of the sinner, is at once a mysterious and an almighty work. It is exclusively the work of God. Speaking of Christ, John states as follows : "But as many as received him, to them gave he power to be- come the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name; which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, norof the willof man, but of God." John'i. 12, 13. Speak- ing of himself and his fellow Christians, Paul says "we are his, that is, God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus, created unto good works." The creation of all things was by the word of God's power, without the supposed pre- existence of any materials. And the spiritual creation, is 218 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. the exertion of ''the exceeding greatness of his power;" a power compared by the apostle to that which "he wrought in Christ, when he raised him from the dead, and set him at his own right hand in the heavenly places. " The above passages, to which many might be added, directly as- cribe to God the regeneration of the sinner. But besides this direct testimony, the form of expression furnishes an argu- ment equally forcible with the positive declaration. They are created ; to create is exclusively the prerogative of the Almighty, When the Saviour said to the man sick of the palsy, "thy sins be forgiven thee," the Scribes, kindling into rage at the apprehended blasphemy, exclaimed, " Who can forgive sins but God ?" The conviction from which this proceeded was just. With equal justness we all exclaim, Who can create but God ? In one of the above passages, it is said, concerning those that are brought to Christ, "He," that is God, "gave them power to become the sons of God," and he describes them as "born not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God." Why, I ask, was Christ called the Son of God ? because he was begotten of the Father. " Thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee." Peter ascribes to God, in behalf of the regenerated, special praise, in that "God the Father had begotten them again to a lively hope through the resurrec- tion of Jesus Christ from the dead." The full grown man, or woman, is begotten again by God the Father, and is born again. Surprise may force the exclamation from a carnal heart, ' Can a man be born when he is old ?' No ; if re- ference be had to created power — No. But if the case be taken as it is; if a spiritual truth be the thing intended; if God be the agent, the answer is. Yes. It is God that work- eth in them to change them from carnal, sensual, and devil- ish, to spiritual, holy, and heavenly. If the phrases ' begot- ON REGENERATION. 219 ten again,' 'born again,' ' created anew,' mean any thing, they must mean something above human conception, some- thing beyond the reach of human agency. We infer, then, that regeneration is a glorious work of God. Again : If the estate of man be such as the Scriptures re- present, regeneration must be a supernatural work. Two appellations fully describe the whole human race; the right- eous and the wicked. The term, righteous, includes all, who, being united to Christ, have, by divine appointment and reckoning, his righteousness as theirs. They are renewed after the image of Him who created them; and have the Holy Ghost within them, to perfect what he has begun. Of these two descriptions of men, the apostle speaks as fol- lows: "We know, that whosoever is born of God sinneth not, but he that is begotten of God keepeth himself, and that wicked one toucheth him not ; and we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wicked- ness" — All except the justified. The word translated lieth, is often used by Homer, to denote one who lieth slain. The whole world lieth slain in wickedness. " Out of the heart of man proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceits, lascivious- ness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness." ''The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked, who can know it.'"' "The Lord looked down from heaven, upon the children of men, to see if there were any that did understand and seek after God." And what is the report which he brings? "They are all gone aside, they are alto- gether become filthy, there is none that doeth good ; no, not one." And Paul's quotation and paraphrase upon this Psalm, presents this picture in shadesof still deeper darkness. "All that is in theworld, the lust ofthe flesh, the lust of the eye, and the pride of life" — such is the description, which 2-30 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. He, who well knows what is in the hearts of men, gives of our race, out of which many are to be so transformed as to be like angels ; yea, like to God. And v/ho in earth or in heaven, but God, can effect the wondrous change? Can any heal themselves? Can any turn their hatred of God and holiness into love and delight? Then "can the Ethio- pian change his skin ;" then "can the leopard change his spots." Can any produce the required change upon his fellow man? Recourse has been had to human justice to stay the progress of wickedness. The experiment has been fully made, through a series of years, reaching back to the youth of time, now become old and hoary. All the while, the protection of law, and the immunities of organized govern- ments, have joined their influence with the fear of hell and the hope of heaven, to prompt men to the practice of virtue. Penalties, graduated by the enormity of crime, have been threatened and inflicted. Justice has dealt out its severi- ties. And what has been effected ? Avarice has put forth its greatest strength, in laying schemes too deep for the discernment of justice, or too intricate to be scanned by man. The assassin has been taught more covertly to aim his deadly thrust ; the debauchee to look for thicker dark- ness; and the voluptuary, still more devoted, to abide steady at his stall. Philosophers, and wise men, and pro- phets, and teachers have spent their skill and power upon our race, and all in vain. Parents, to instructions, have added watchfulness, and correction, and entreaties, and prayers. And where is the proselyte? Let the panyge- rists of human nature point him out ? Sportive nature might produce a white crow or a black swan; but in the pro- duction of man, a field of operation far more splendid, na- ture is utterly impotent; her ofispring are all of a spot — all guilty, all polluted. The enemy occupies the citadel, all ON REGENERATION. 221 the springs of human action are poisoned ; every power of soul and body partakes of vileness. And as wise phy- sicians sometimes say of chronic diseases, " it were easier to make a new man than cure them." So in this case, the only cure for man is new creation. And who, but God, can create ? Bear with me, while I place before you another class of Scripture testimony on this gloomy view of human nature ; and be assured, I should not call upon you to look so long upon the melancholy scene, did I not believe that a long and attentive look might prove the means of exciting you to flee from the grasp of death, now binding many of you fast, to the arms of Christ your deliverer. The Scriptures we shall produce specify the extent of sin's dominion over the powers and faculties of man. "God saw that the wicked- ness of man was great on the earth, and that every imagi- nation of the thoughts of his heart was only evil contin- ually." Rom. viii. 7. "The carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." "The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. " The Apostle describes the heathen, as "having their under- standings darkened, being alienated from the life of God, through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blind- ness of their hearts." Over Israel and Judea God lamented: "My people is foolish ; they have not known me; they are sottish children, and they have none understanding, they are wise to do evil ; but to do good they have no knowledge." Paul speaks of Christians as alive from the dead, and as quickened or brought to life from an estate of death. These are a few, out of many passages, which show the reign of sin over all that pertains to man. Over his 222 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. intellectual powers, — "every thought of the imagination of the heart" is affected. "The carnal mind," or the mind of the flesh, 'is enmity against God.' Here the understanding, together with the will and affections, are included, as sub- ject to the ' enmity.' The other passages are equally com- prehensive: while, in some, our ruined and helpless estate is signified by a term, whose import duly felt, depresses the human spirits and inclines to melancholy. ^^ Dead in tres- passes and sins." Deplorable condition! — and desperate too ; were it not that a life giving-spirit, the Spirit of Christ, is promised to raise men from the dead. Knowledge, which once ruled the whole man, and so spread the image of God before the soul as to engage all its powers in cheerful har- mony and delightful unison, in the praise and enjoyment of Him who is alone lovely and who alone can bless, is sup- planted by ignorance : its seat is become the abode of dark- ness. Without knowledge, man in paradise had not been man. Until the understanding is restored to its rightful dominion, man will still be far below himself. None of our powers are whole. Sin has universal possession, and universal do- minion. Our bodies are vile, nor can they be refined till they turn to dust, and are raised and fashioned anew. What a wreck is the nature of man ! The shattered frame- work around a ruined soul, reminds us of what it once con- tained ; but when we ask what is now within, we are told that it is a vile, polluted, deformed thing, which, ere long, is to be torn from its insecure moorings, to be engulphed in a Charybdis that casts out none of its dead. But I have said that the work is mysterious as well as almio^hty. Who can trace and develope the operations of Jehovah in the creation of the world ? Who can tell by what process rude and undigested chaos, from nothing, was brought into being? Who can explain the way of the ON REGENERATION. 223 Lord, in reducing the jumbled materials into order ? Who can illustrate the manner of balancing and adjusting the worlds, so that each maintains its destined place, and moves under laws eternal as its existence? "The morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for jo)'," when they gazed with astonishment on the finished and stupendous system. Its mystery and magnificence in- spired their song, and gave elevation to their praise. When one sinner repenteth, or is new created, there is joy in heaven. '^I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth." Luke XV. 10. This is a part of the work of man's redemp- tion into which ''the angels desire to look;" and where they adore the author, whose way to them is hid. Though * in lower strains, the glorified saints join the heavenly choir, in notes like these, "To Him that loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood, and hath made us kings and priests to God and his Father; to him be glory and do- minion forever and ever, amen." The people of God, who witness the happy change in others, look on with devout admiration, and as they see the babe in Christ growing to maturity, their anticipations of the crowning scene, when they shall put on immortality, how transporting ! Though the way of God in operating on the nature of man in regeneration be thus mysterious ; yet he has gracious- ly revealed the means which he employs, while he has en- joined on us the duty of seeking to become partakers of it. When we speak of means as employed by God, and as enjoined on us, we do not mean to intimate that God can- not, or does not, renew sinners without the use of external means. For ought that we can discern, our salvation was conferred by Christ on one of his fellow-sufferers on the 82 224 SPRUCE STREET LECTUHES. cross, who, until on the cross, was ignorant of him. One of the Evangelists testifies, that "they, that were crucified with him, reviled him." Yet to one of these, the Saviour declared, ''This day shalt thou he with me in paradise." What we affirm on this subject is, that means go into the general plan of God in the regeneration of sinners. Allow me here to say, that men are to be regarded, ordi- narily, as possessing all the faculties and powers proper to man ; this I presume will be called in question by none. As little, surely, ought any to doubt that all these, of what- ever name, are so perverted and polluted, that, until re- newed by grace, the exercise of them in every case is sinful. We are men, but men fallen ! We are men, but • men dead, as to holy or spiritual action. We are men, but men in ruin, and exposed to the wrath to come. Now, that men may be prepared for heaven, which is at least the secon- dary end of the Gospel dispensation, it is obvious, that they must undergo a thorough reform. Every power and faculty of their nature must become the opposite of what it was. The mental faculties, which especially distinguish man from the inferior creatures, and which are the light which ought to guide, and the power which ought to impel all the rest, must, in the order of nature, as well as of grace, first be acted upon. Hence the grand means which God uses for the conversion of sinners, is his Word. Be- lievers are said to be *'born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth forever." The word of God is addressed to the un- derstandings of men, whether in the reading or preaching of it: and if the heart is to believe unto righteousness, it must be reached through the intellectual faculties. In proof of this, I refer you to the manner of the divine Saviour, in his Sermon on the Mount. What does it contain that is not ON REGENERATION. 225 directed to the understandings and consciences of men?. By what other avenue does he seek to approach their hearts? The sermon of Peter, so justly celebrated for its power and success, had plainly for its aim the conviction of the consciences of his hearers. The burden of his preaching was, the proof that he whom they had lately crucified, was constituted both Lord and Christ. The eflfect was, their convinced consciences compelled the inquiry ad- dressed to Peter and the rest of the Apostles, "Men and brethren, what shall we do?" Agreeably to the promise of Christ, the Holy Ghost prepared their hearts to receive the truth, and wrought through its means the proper effects. Vainly do men address the feelings of the human heart, in the hope of changing it. Let any show me an instance wherein Christ or his Apostles endeavoured to back sin- ners into a religious course, by direct addresses to feelings and dispositions, and I will consent that they preach to these, "till sides and benches fail." Faith is the grace that savingly unites the sinner to the Lord Jesus Christ ; but "how can the sinner believe in him of whom he has not heard, and how shall he hear without a preacher." So ^' faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God." The word of God, I admit, addressed to the human mind with all ihe native force of truth, and adorned and softened with all the persuasion of human eloquence, if there be nothing more, will leave the human heart a stone un^ broken. Yet if the same word come to the ear by the utter- ance of the Holy Spirit, though it come as a still small voice, and even lisp its whisper, it will reach the heart. Its power will be felt, and the heart will, as He pleases, either melt or break. When He bears home the truth upon the heart, or rather when He prepares the heart to receive it, and willa its renovation, the designed issue may be confidently ex- 226 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. pected. When chaos lumbered in impenetrable darkness, God said, "Let there be light :" and light shone all around : and this same God "who commanded the light to shine out of darkness," says the Apostle, "hath shined into our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ." The Gospel preached, <'not with the enticing words of man's wisdom," but in demonstration of the Spirit and of power, is the grand means to give to the cross of Christ full effect. "The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell his dream," but let him that hath God's word, speak it faithfully; for, says God, "what is the chaff to the wheat ? Is not my word like as a fire, and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces?" Jer. xxiii. 27. "It is quick and powerful, sharper than a two edged sword, pierc- ing even to the dividing asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow, and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." Heh. iv. 12. When the Lord speaks, will not all nature hear? On one occasion, while the Saviour slept, the winds and waves had combined their forces, and his disciples felt that their ship must sink. The Saviour arose and rebuked the winds, and commanded the swollen billows, "Peace, be still, and there was a great calm." "Lazarus, come forth," exclaimed Jesus, and the man of Bethany, already four days dead, comes forth alive. Unclean spirits depart at his rebuke. Diseases, the most inveterate, are healed by his word. And cannot Christ by his Spirit and his Word, quicken into life the dead in sin, and lead them forth to follow him ? Ignorance of our natural condition, and mistaken views of the plan laid for our salvation, may, and often do give occasion to devise plans, and form purposes, to turn to Christ; and these purposes are often accompanied with strong expectations of success. How hollow, how airy, are such hopes ! A ON REGENERATION. 227 scribe, a man skilled in the law, comes to Christ, and de- clares his purpose in terms most liberal, most unreserved: <'Lord, I will follow thee whithersoever thou goest." Christ treats his proposal with respect, and tells him plainly what he might look for. "The foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests, but the Son of man hath not where to lay his head." This was enough. His ex- pectations were all cut off. He slips out of view; you hear no more of him. Again ; the Lord Jesus fixes his eyes on one, and addresses him saying, "Follow me." He entreats a delay until he should perform the last offices of filial piety to a deceased father. "Let the dead bury their dead, but go thou and preach the kingdom of God." Here, there is no further objection. This, indeed, was a call to a special end, but then it was a call to an arduous office, to greater danger and more self-denial, than ordinarily falls to the lot of the private Christian. Here it is proper to remark, that Christ, while he pre- sents divine truth before the mind in the execution of his prophetical office, exerts his power as a king upon the human heart ; as a prophet or teacher, he speaks as never man spake. The brightness of truth shines upon the mind with a lustre unknown before, when he comes to show the way of life. Though the truths exhibited, are none other than those contained in the Scriptures, the light is withal supernatural. It comes home upon the mind, accompanied with evidences of truth that constrain conviction ; — while, as a king, he exerts his mighty power upon the soul to give it efficacy. As a king, new powers of perception, of appre- hension, judging, and choice are given. While truth is ex- hibited to the mind, so that the word is with power, the soul, being at the same time convinced, persuaded, and ena- bled, accepts the offered salvation. As a prophet, Christ 228 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. acts immediately by the word, at the same time that he acts immediately ami directly upon the soul as a king, in its renovation. Thus far we have ventured to speak of the manner of this mysterious work of God. In this light the Apostle seems to our view to exhibit it. "We all, with open face, beholding as in a glass, the glory of God, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the Lord." 2 Cor. iii. 10. Analagous to this is the instance of the cure performed on the man whose hand was withered. Christ commanded him, "Stretch forth thine hand; and he stretched it out, and his hand was restored whole as the other." Here the communication of health to the motionless and diseased member, was plainly at the time when the command ope- rated on the mind. While Paul talked with a little group of women assembled at Philippi, the Lord opened the heart of Lydia. In common with others, she listened to Paul's instructions; but she had listened in vain, unless the Spirit had turned her heart to the truth, or prepared her heart to receive it. If what I have said be scriptural ; and for one I be- lieve it is ; then we may boldly affirm, that all shall be regenerated that were given to Christ in the eternal purpose of God ; the means shall never be withdrawn, nor the operations of grace suspended, until all that are bought with the blood of Christ shall be cleansed and brought home to heaven. "For, saith God, as the rain that cometh down and the snow from heaven, and returneth not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it to bring forth and bud, that it may give seed to the sower and bread to the eater, so shall my word be, that goeth out of my mouth ; it shall not re- turn to me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereunto I sent it." ON REGENERATION. 229 In the past discussion on the importance of the word of God as a means of salvation, as used by the author of rege- neration to produce it, I have necessarily exhibited its use- fulness as employed by man in seeking salvation; and shall now trouble you farther but with a few remarks. It will be admitted, that in the use of the word, as read and preached, there is a fitness for the accomplishment of the end intended. It reveals all that is necessary to be known, or believed, or done by men. It presents to our view all that God hath done, and all that he hath promised to do, to effect it. We are enjoined -to hear the word ; to meditate upon it; to believe and obey it. It is recommended under prospects of unspeakable benefit. ''It is able to make wise unto salvation, through faith that is in Jesus Christ. All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profit- able for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished to every good work." The Scrip- tures "convert the soul; they make wise the simple." As the word is the important means by which God ap- proaches the sinner, so that the sinner may be found in the various uses of it, which it recommends, must be a matter of much concern. While the Eunuch read the Scriptures, the Spirit told Philip to draw near and instruct him; and the effect was, that he that read believed. "While Paul reasoned of righteousness, temperance, and judgment to come, Felix trembled." The sacraments, considered as means of grace, are mainly concerned with real Christians. They are employed as seals, to renew and confirm their covenant engagements ; and in general, to promote the growth of the life already given. Attention to these is not, therefore, necessary in the present discussion ; in which we are singly concerned 230 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. with the instrumentality employed, in procuring and con- stituting the new, the heavenly life. Let us turn our attention to prayer as a duty, which the Holy Ghost may bless to our souls, as instrumental in their regeneration. Of this our Saviour says, that " men ought always to pray and not to faint." Paul, in addressing the ido- latrous Athenians, states to them, as reasons which ought to bend them to the worship of the true God, that all nations are made of one blood ; that they are all dependent on God their Creator, whose extended providence embraces the most minute concerns and relations of their lives, and that he does this, that they may be excited *' to seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him and find him." »dcts xvii. 27. This seeking is here held up to view as reasonable, and not [altogether hopeless to the heathen. " thou that hearest prayer," says the Psalmist, "unto thee all flesh shall come.'' Psalm Ixv. 2. Peter, who says of Simon, "Thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity," yet commands him "Repent of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee !" *^cis vii. 22. That prayer is the duty of all men, whether regenerate or the contrary, the above passages seem to prove. And I have never yet ascer- tained upon what grounds, prayer has been forbidden to the worst of men. If the purity of the heart, and the perfection of the performance, constitute the reasons of the command, then the command were vain ; all would fail of acceptance, for none could so pray. Were they ca- pable of performing it perfectly, then were it unnecessary. There could be no reason for prayer to Adam in paradise; he possessed all that he could wish or enjoy. Abundant indeed was his reason for praise. We never hear that ON REGENERATION. 231 angels pray, nor the spirits of the just made perfect. For praise they have ample reason. It will be noticed here, that we use the word prayer, singly to signify petition. We offer then, as one reason of preferring requests to God, or of the duty of prayer, our forlorn and necessitous condition. The Gospel is addressed to us as sinners, under, and liable to all the consequences of sin ; and our duty is, to come to God as we really are, encouraged by his gra- cious promises. This duty again, we say, is founded on the fulness of blessing treasured up in Christ, in behalf of sinners. " When he ascended up on high he received gifts for men," even for the rebellious. These he holds in pos- session. Another reason on which is founded the duty, and I will add, the encouragement to pray, is, that all the ful- ness of Christ, as mediator, is in Him, by the gift of God the Father, for the specific end of bestowing it on those that were chosen in Him to eternal life; and, therefore. He that is thus full of blessing is willing to give. Who is there among you, whose conscience condemns him as guilty? What will you be told that you must do, to escape punish- ment? The modern theology commands, repent. Can you repent? No : it is only obtained by the gift of God. But if you could repent — could you by that means cancel the ac- count that stands against you? Impossible; what course then can be left for the sinner, but to ask forgiveness? and why not with prayer? when inspiration tells you, that ''with the Lord there is forgiveness, with the Lord there is mercy, and with him is plenteous redemption." I say again, that the earnestness, ardour, sincerity, or even the faith of the suppliant, cannot be the reason why God accepts his prayer or his person. The unregenerate sinner is acted upon by the Spirit of Christ, as a prophet and as a 33 232 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES, king, in regeneration. The sinner is passive, he is a mere recipient. Christ finds him dead ; he gives him life. The Father finds him guilty, and reckons to him his Son's righ- teousness; he forgives him, and adopts him as his son. For what reason, or on what account ? For none other surely, but the sacrifice and intercession of Christ. Now that he is become a new creature, how does he live, and by what means does he grow? He lives, " by Christ liv- ing in him." He grows by him, who, while he is "the author, is also the finisher of faith." He now works, but it is by God that worketh in him to will and do of his good pleasure. If God, then, accept and bless even a real Christian, he cannot be moved so to do, either by what he does, or by his manner of doing it; but because he is in Christ, because the fulness of Christ is his. He belongs to Christ's fold, and the great Shepherd of the sheep is bound by covenant engagement to feed him. For Christ's sake, and for his sake alone, good men receive a gracious answer to their prayers ; and they all, with one accord, do ask, that the spirit of prayer may be given them ; they all do thank God when they receive it; while they jointly ex- claim, "Thou, Lord, hast wrought all our works in us." Should any one declare the contrary, and affirm that his ar- dour and importunity had melted the heart of Jehovah to pity, and rendered him propitious, ye all would say to such a one, "Thou hast a lie in thy right hand." Were you to suppose that God would weigh the prayers of the righte- ous in a scale of equity, having separated what is pure from what is vile, the latter would still preponderate, and the side of purity would kick the beam : — but this purity, of whatever amount, has been communicated to them ; and to God be the praise. The elect of God in Christ Jesus are, in common with others, the subjects of sin, and charged ON REGENERATION. 233 with guilt while in their natural condition ; and as they are not yet united to Christ, nor dealt with as those that are in him, their prayers, cannot be approved by a Holy God, Yet I contend that there is unspeakable importance in prayer to them. 1st. Because they are chosen in Christ, that they should be holy, and so Christ is concerned to make them so. For this end the great High Priest above intercedes for them. "I pray for them, I pray not for the world, but for those which thou hast given me out of the world, for they are thine." Here he intercedes for his disciples, as being given him by actual calling. But again he says, "Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also, who shall believe on me through their word." In this you behold the Saviour looking forward to generations rising into existence in or- derly succession to the end of time, as embraced in the travail of his soul, as objects of his intercession, as to be made the subjects of his grace. To all quarters, too, is his attention turned. "Other sheep I have, that are not of this fold ; them also I must bring, and they shall hear my voice, and there shall be one fold and one shepherd." How will this shepherd gather his flock together? Hewill send his word to the places where they wander and address them; he will turn their hearts to prayer by speaking through his Spirit to them, and compel them to come. Now what man that prays, can tell when the Spirit of God may inspire him, or that he will always pray in vain. If he be one for whom Christ intercedes, there surely will be a time when means will encompass him, and when the power that raised up Jesus from the dead, will give elevation to his soul, and lift it up to heaven. The opposition made to Paul's ministry at Corinth, had discouraged him, and had tempted him to turn away ; at which crisis the Lord spoke to Paul in the night 234 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. by a vision, saying, " Be not afraid, but speak and hold not thy peace, for I am with thee, and no one shall set on thee to hurt thee, for I have much people in this city." Thus does he, to whom the kingdom belongs, provide that all things shall conspire, whether preaching or praying, reading or hearing, with the Almighty power which he waits to employ at the proper moment appointed in the eternal decree, for calling the elect from darkness to light, for creating them anew. If I have succeeded in showing that regeneration is ex- clusively the work of God, all the powers and faculties of men being deeply depraved, and incapable of any right ex- ercise or employment towards God ; then it will be asked, why does God command what no man is able to perform? and why does he punish them for not obeying? 1 know not a better answer than the old one given b}' our fathers, who have long since fallen asleep in Christ. — That God's right to obedience cannot be dissolved by the disO' bedience of his subjects; and that the lower we are sunk in a spirit of rebellion, the greater is our guilt. But I enter my solemn protest against all the reasoning of men on the subject of ability, as concerned with the question whether God is justified in requiring what we are unable to perform. To those who labour to defend the Divine plan in this particu- lar, I seem to hear God asking, who hath required this at your hand ? Sure I am, that the discussion of this sub- ject, has brought forth sentiments near akin to blasphemy. To theories of men on this subject I pay no attention. I shall sim.ply lay before you what I believe the Scriptures teach. I trust none of you will condemn me, when I say that all men, in an estate of nature, are under the curse of the law ? I care not, in this case, whether you regard original sin, or depravity, or both united, as the cause, if ON REGENERATION. 235 you admit that all the world stands guilty before God. It will surely be admitted, that from this damnation none can deliver themselves. If any could, then hath Christ died in vain. That God hath interposed for our deliver- ance, is matter of unspeakable joy and praise. What then is the plan which God hath laid, and which he is executing? He hath appointed his Son, and sent him to obey the law in our room and stead. In his life he has fulfilled the right- eousness of the law, or the obedience which it required of us, as our substitute. In his death he has offered himself a sacrifice, and made an atonement for the sins of his peo- ple By these means God has opened a channel of inter- course between himself and sinners. Through Christ as the way, God comes down with blessings to men. Through Christ the intercessor, men appear before the mercy seat above. All fulness dwells in Christ, as mediator — as the fruit of his purchase — to be bestowed on men. On this ac- count, all the promises are said to be "in him yea, and in him Amen, to the glory of God." This accomplished, God calls sinners to come to Christ, to believe in Christ — surely not because he knows they are able and ready to comply ; for their inability and aversion are most fully known to him; but he does so, because he has amply provided through his Son, whatever exertion of power on his part may be needful, and whatever gift to be bestowed for fulfilling his merciful design. If any contend that they have power to believe — I care not whether they call it natural or moral power — they are aside of the Gospel plan of salvation, which proposes faith, and every thing else needful to the sinner, as matter of gift. Such, seeking to be justified by the deeds of the law, or deeds of their own, " are fallen from grace." If a man is able to believe, why is he not able to love ? If he is able to repent, why is he not able to avoid sin and 236 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. render repentance unnecessary ? The truth is, that the Gos- pel scheme contemplates man as guilty, as condemned, as utterly impotent, as lifeless in a spiritual sense. And the grace of God takes man as it finds him. The sinner does not hear the voice, (so deaf is he to the things that ought to alarm him,) which tells him, '