,-,,.v^^v  ^^  •"*"'  ^//.>, 
 
 princp:ton.  n.  j. 
 
 Purchased    by  the 
 Mrs.    Robert   Lenox    Kennedy  Church   History   Fund 
 
 BR  742  .B6  1820  v. 2 
 Brown,  John,  1722-1787. 
 A  compendious  history  of  the 
 British  churches  in 
 
<^mi^y^^^^<UTp 
 
 A 
 
 COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY 
 
 OF  THE 
 
 BRITISH  CHURCHES 
 
 IN 
 
 ENGLAND, 
 SCOTLAND,  IRELAND,  AND  AMERICA. 
 
 WITH  AN 
 
 INTRODUCTORY  SKETCH 
 
 OF  THE 
 
 SHstori)  of  t\)t  Sfflallrcusts. 
 
 TO  WHICH  IS  ADDED, 
 
 AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE  SECESSION. 
 
 BY  JOHN  BROWN, 
 
 LATE  PROFESSOR  OF  DIVINITY  UNDER  THF  ASSOCIATE  SYNOD, 
 AND  MINISTER  OF  THE  GOSPEL,  HADDINGTON. 
 
 Walk  about  Zion, — tell  the  towers  thereof,  mark  ye  well  her  bulwarks,  consider  her 
 palaces ;  that  ye  may  tell  it  to  the  generation  following."         Psalm  xlviii.  12,  15. 
 
 VOL.  IL 
 
 EDINBURGH: 
 
 rraxTED  for  thomas  Hamilton,  London^  and 
 
 E.  MONTEITH  Sf  CO.  EDINBURGH. 
 
 1820. 
 
rnntrJ  by  TUIfoui  -ind  CUrkf . 
 Kainburi:h,  IH?H. 
 
CONTENTS  OF  VOL.  II, 
 
 A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE  CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND. 
 CHAPTER  I. 
 
 Christianity  Introduced—Popery  follows,  and  gains  ground  about 
 1100  years— Resby,  Craw,  Hamilton,  Wishart,  Mill,  &c.  burnt 
 for  opposing  it — and  many  others  persecuted 1 
 
 CHAPTER  n. 
 
 Protestant  Reformation  pushed  on  by  Knox— Promoted  by  the  No- 
 bility and  others,  opposed  by  the  Queen  Regent— Established  by 
 the  Parliament,  A.  D.  1 560— Confession  of  Faith— First  Book  of 
 Discipline — Reformation  carried  on  by  the  Ministers  and  others 
 in  opposition  to  Queen  Mary— and  under  the  Earl  of  Murray 
 further  established— Morton  attempts  to  introduce  Prelatic 
 Church  Government,  but  is  opposed  by  Knox,  who  soon  after 
 died— and  others — Second  Book  of  Discipline  is  formed 15 
 
 CHAPTER  nr. 
 
 King  James  VI.  introduces  the  National  Covenant;  and  Presby- 
 teries formed— He  once  and  again  labours  to  establish  Prelacy 
 and  his  own  Erastian  Supremacy— National  Covenant  renew- 
 
Jv  CONTENTS. 
 
 Page 
 
 cd — Prcibjflcrian  Church  Government    established— Assembly 
 Covenant  with  God,  and  earnestly  promote  Reformation '^•^ 
 
 CHAPTER  IV. 
 
 King  James  favours  Papists,  and  by  captious  questionfi — Clergy- 
 men's Vote  in  !*arliament — Constant  Moderators — Packed  Ge- 
 neral Assemblies — Introduction  of  Diocesan  Bishops  and  Po- 
 pish Ceremonies — And  by  Persecution  of  the  Faithful  about 
 twenty-seven  years,  terribly  defaced  the  Church — King  Charles 
 I.  and  Archbishop  Laud,  for  about  thirteen  years  more,  incrcas- 
 «d  her  misery,  by  supporting  Amiinianism  and  Prelacy,  and 
 obtruding  more  Sup«r»»itlon "^ 
 
 CHAPTER  V. 
 
 By  bold  and  piudi-nt  Remonstrances — by  solemnly  renewing  their 
 Covenant  with  (lod — by  warlike  Defence  of  themselves  against 
 Charles  I.  and  Montrose,  his  Lieutenant — by  entering  into  a  Co- 
 venant with,  and  assisting  the  English — by  opposing  Hamilton's 
 Knpapcmcnt — by  adopting  new  Standards  or  Doctrine,  Wor- 
 ship, Discipline,  and  Government,  and  by  many  excellent  Acts 
 of  Assembly  and  Parliament,  the  Covenanters  carry  their  He- 
 formation  to  great  Perfection,  between   1637  and  IGol I'^D 
 
 CMAPTEii  VI. 
 By  the  rash  Admission  of  King  Charles  II — by  public  Resolutions 
 oflhcCommisjiion  to  please  him — by  his  unlimited  Restoration — 
 RcesUblishment  »>f  Prelacy — Im|>ositionof  sinful  Oaths  and  De- 
 c  laraiionii,  and  Bond? — And  terrible  Persecution  of  all  faithful 
 Adherents  to  their  Covenants  wilh(;o<l — sind  cyvnbyhh  Im{nlf,in. 
 rirjofthc  IcM  Faithful — and  by  the  Labours  of  King  Jame*  VIL 
 i<»  introduce  Pofxry.  the  once  attained  Reformation  is  almost 
 ml  inly  ruined,  l>ctwccn  Id'A  and  16W ^^ 
 
 CHAPTER  Vn. 
 Kini;  William  btu»-  enthroned.  Prelacy  it  abolished,  and  Presby- 
 tery ic-e*t«bli-.hnl — Many,  but  not  all.  grievances  iitlitrNted — 
 Mjny  jrtHMl  Ait.%  o(  AsMuiblitf — Religion  •Jmost  at  a  stand  for 
 
CONTENTS.  V 
 
 I'agc 
 Qlwve  twenty  years— but  afterwards  much  hurt  by  the  Union 
 Settlement — By  the  Abjuration  Oath — Toleration  Act — Resto- 
 ration of  Patronage — Condemnation  of  tho  Marrow — Simson, 
 Glass,  Campbell,  Wishart,  &c/s  Errors — Manifold  divisions 
 thereby  occasioned 375 
 
 AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE  RISE  ANp 
 rUOGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION. 
 
COi^IPENDIOUS  HISTORY 
 
 CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND. 
 
 CONTAINING 
 
 AN  ACCOUNT 
 
 OF  THE 
 
 MOST  MATEHIAL  TRANSACTIONS  SINCE  THE  INTRODUCTION 
 OF  CHRISTIANITY  TO  THE  PRESENT  TIME. 
 
 TOGETHER  WITH 
 
 A  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY 
 
 OF  THE 
 
 CHURCH   OF    SCOTLAND. 
 
 CHAPTER  I. 
 
 Christianity  Introducedr— Popery  follows,  and  gains  ground 
 about  1100  years — Resby,  Craw,  Hamilton,  Wishart, 
 Mill,  Sfc.  burnt  for  opposing  it — and  many  others  per- 
 secuted. 
 
 Who  first  published  the  gospel  of  Christ  in  North 
 Britain  we  know  not:  But,  from  our  ancestors' 
 zealous  attachment  to  observe  their  Easter  upon  the 
 1 4th  day  of  the  moon,  we  are  tempted  to  think  that 
 some  of  their  first  preachers  had  come  from  the 
 Lesser  Asia,  after  that  superstition  had  become  fa- 
 shionable there.  It  is  said,  that  about  A.  D.  203, 
 King  Donald  I.  and  his  queen,  with  several  of  his 
 nobles,  embraced  the  Christian  religion ;  and  that 
 Cratilinth,  about  seventy  years  after,  more  fully 
 established  it,  and  abolished  heathenism.  Probably 
 vor,.  I.  B 
 
\l  A   CU.MrENDIOUS    HISTORY   01    THK 
 
 llic  terrible  persecution  raised  by  Diocletian,  the 
 Roman  emj)eror,  about  A.  D.  t502,  obli/;ed  both 
 preachers  arj»l  other  Christians,  in  the  south  parts  of 
 the  ishind,  to  flee  northward,  where  his  power  could 
 not  reach  them. — Palladius,  coming  from  Rome,  in 
 the  .Olh  century,  to  assist  our  preachers  in  their  op- 
 position to  the  Felatiian  heresy,  is  said  to  have  intro- 
 duced diocesan  prelacy,  and  to  have  sent  St.  Patrick 
 from  near  Glnsi^ow  to  Ireland,  in  order  to  christia- 
 nize the  inhabitants,  or  to  introduce  bishops  among 
 them.  But  so  inconsiderable  was  the  power  of  these 
 j)rimary  bisho|)s,  that  it  was  not  till  about  six  hun- 
 dred years  afterward  that  they  had  any  fixed  dio- 
 ceses in  Scotland.  About  this  time,  Hildebert,  Se- 
 dulius,  Columba,  and  other  learned  men,  flourished 
 here,  antl  were  encouraged  by  Congall  our  kin^^. 
 And  in  this,  or  the  next  century,  Kintogern,  Bal- 
 dred,  Conval,  INIornan,  Cormack,  Ilebred,  l^unstan, 
 Jonas,  Gabrian,  (iall,  and  Columban,  were  famed 
 preachers,  'J'he  two  last  travelled  into  France  and 
 Switzerland,  if  not  also  into  part  of  Italy. 
 
 About  A.  n.  .;2(),  the  Saturnalian  festivals  of  the 
 heathens,  which  had  in  other  |)laces  been  before 
 transferred  to  the  pretended  honour  of  Jesus  Christ, 
 were  introduced  into  Scotland,  and  still  continue  to 
 be  observed  in  our  revels  of  Christmas  and  the 
 new  year,  under  pretence  of  honouring  the  birth 
 and  circumcision  of  our  Saviour.  In  tlie  seventh 
 rentury,  Thomian,  Cohitnban,  Chroman,  Hathan, 
 Herman,  Laustran,  Slellan,  Seigan,  Corman,  Ai- 
 Han,  Tinan,  Colman,  Adaman,  Chilian,  Wire, 
 Plechelm,  Samson,  and  Chinens,  ma<ie  a  respect- 
 able figure  in  the  clej  ical  order.  But  nu)st  of  them 
 were  terriblv  harrassed  by  Augustin,  Wilfrid, 
 noniface,  arxl  other  P<mtin{al  mi>>i()naries  from 
 Rome,  because  they  refused  to  suhjrct  their  con- 
 .sciences  or  country' to  his  Papal  Alajesty,   and  op- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  O 
 
 posed  the  observation  of  Easter  on  the  day  ap- 
 pointed at  Rome,  as  well  as  the  imposition  of  celi- 
 bacy on  the  clergy,  and  of  their  shavin^r  of  their 
 heads  in  the  form  of  a  cross,  to  mark  their  mission 
 from  Christ.  In  the  eighth  century,  we  find  a 
 considerable  number  of  learned  men,  of  whom  John 
 of  Air,  Alcuin,  Clemens,  and  Raban,  favourites  of 
 Charles  the  Great  of  Germany  and  France,  appear 
 to  have  been  the  chief;  but  whether  they  were  all 
 natives  of  Scotland  I  know  not. 
 
 About  A.  D.  860,  a  Synod  held  at  Scoon  enacted, 
 That  all  clergymen  should  reside  at  their  charges ; 
 instruct  their  people  by  their  example,  as  well  as 
 by  their  doctrine ;  that  they  should  keep  no  hawks 
 or  hounds  for  hunting;  that  they  should  neither 
 cany  warlike  weapons,  nor  plead  any  civil  causes. 
 Constantine,  the  king,  also  enacted,  That  drunken- 
 ness should  be  punished  with  death  ;  and  that  none 
 should  take  above  one  meal  a-day,  or  accustom 
 themselves  to  lie  on  soft  beds.  About  A.  D.  904^, 
 King  Gregory,  in  a  convention  of  states  at  Forfar, 
 is  said  to  have  exempted  the  clergy  from  all  taxes, 
 service  in  war,  or  subjection  to  civil  courts; — and 
 to  have  given  them  power  to  draw  tithes,  enact 
 ecclesiastical  canons,  and  judge  of  matrimonial  and 
 testamentary  causes.  It  was  moreover  €n acted, 
 that  every  king,  at  his  coronation,  should  swear  to 
 maintain  all  the  clerical  privileges.  About  A.  D. 
 977>  Beornel,  or  Bernet,  a  Scotch  bishop,  and 
 others,  were  summoned  to  England,  to  have  their 
 heretical  principle  of  the  lawfulness  of  priests'  mar- 
 riage disproved  and  condemned.  Dunstan,  bishop 
 of  Canterbury,  their  principal  opponent,  by  causing 
 the  beams  of  the  floor  on  which  they  sat,  to  be 
 secretly  cut,  that  it  might  sink  under  every  one 
 but  himself,  pretended  that  their  fall,  while  he  re- 
 u^ained  safe,  plainly  marked  the  decision  of  heaven 
 
4  A   (  U.MPKNDIOUS   IIISTOKY  OF   THE 
 
 in  his  favours.  AI)Out  the  beginning  of  the  eleventh 
 century,  King  Malcolm  fixed  the  bishops  to  parti- 
 cular dioceses,  and  erected  the  bishoprics  of  St. 
 Andrew's,  Glasgow,  IMurray,  Caithness,  Murthlack, 
 and  Aberdeen.  Turgot  was  the  first  bishop  of 
 St.  Andrew's.  In  this  century,  Marian,  Patern, 
 Amichad,  Sigebcrt,  and  Elias,  Scotch  preachers, 
 made  a  respectable  figure  in  Germany.  Kings 
 began  to  be  anointed  at  their  instalment.  About 
 A.  D.  119<S,  King  Alexander,  suspecting  the  in- 
 trusive ambition  of  Thurstan,  archbishop  of  York, 
 desired  Radolf  of  Canterbury  to  provide  a  bishop 
 for  St.  Andrew's :  and  notwithstanding  all  that 
 Thurstan  could  do  to  oppose  it,  one  Eadmer  w  as 
 sent.  But  he,  refusing  to  profess  his  subjection  to 
 the  Cantcrburian  see,  was  soon  obliged  to  relurn 
 to  England. 
 
 In  the  twelfth  century,  kings  and  others  appear- 
 ed madly  intent  on  promoting  Monkish  tkvotion. 
 The  abbeys  of  Scoon,  St.  Columba,  Jedburgh,  Kel- 
 so, Melrose,  Newbottle,  Holyroodhouse,  Kinloss, 
 Cambuskeneth,  Dundrennan,  Ilolm  and  Coultram, 
 and  two  convents  at  Newcastle,  and  one  at  Ber- 
 wick, and  aButher  at  Carlisle  for  nuns,  were  built, 
 and  endowed  with  revenues  mostly  by  King  David, 
 who  also  erected  the  bishoprics  of  Ross,  Brichen, 
 Dunkeld,  and  Dumblane,  and  was  rewarded  with 
 the  honour  of  a  Papal  Saint.  His  successors 
 founded  the  abbies  of  Coupar,  Angus,  Sawtry, 
 Abcrbrotliick,  Balmerino,  and  the  convent  of  ^lax- 
 WL'l.  Tiu'  prior  of  St.  Andrew's,  Richard  a  canon, 
 and  David  a  presbyter,  were  the  most  noted  for 
 learning.  The  Scotch  clergy,  !)eing  cited  to  a 
 council  at  Northampton,  boldly  refused  all  subjec- 
 tion to  ilif  archbishop  of  York,  (iilhert,  a  young 
 canon,  was  their  principal  disputant.  The  convent 
 of  Si.  Andrews'  election  of  an  Englishman  to  that 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  5 
 
 Bee,  occasioned  a  furious  contest  between  King 
 William  and  the  Pope,  who  had  laid  the  whole 
 kingdom  under  an  Interdict  of  all  religious  service, 
 had  not  Scot,  the  elected  bishop,  by  his  earnest 
 supplications,  prevented  it. 
 
 In  the  thirteenth  century,  the  Franciscan  and 
 Dominican  monks  spread  themselves  into  Scotland. 
 King  Alexander  II.  having  assisted  the  French 
 against  King  John  of  England,  now  an  absolute 
 slave  and  deputy  of  the  Pope,  his  holiness  laid  his 
 whole  kingdom  under  an  Interdict.  When  his  Le- 
 gate afterward  came  to  declare  the  nation  absolved 
 from  this  dreadful  curse,  he  so  terribly  oppressed 
 them,  that  they  were  forced  to  complain  of  his 
 conduct  at  Rome.  Another  Legate  quickly  fol- 
 lowed, to  raise  contributions  for  carrying  on  the 
 holy  war  in  Canaan.  Having  spent  what  he  got  in 
 debauchery,  as  he  returned,  he  pretended  that  he 
 had  been  robbed  of  it.  Another  Legate  was  sent 
 from  Rome  to  demand  new  contributions :  but 
 king  Alexander  prohibited  him,  or  any  other,  on 
 any  such  errand,  to  enter  his  kingdom.  Not  long 
 after,  Ottobon,  and  afterward  Rustani,  were  sent 
 to  require  payment  of  the  Pontifical  dues.  But 
 as  king  Alexander  III.  prohibited  the  raising  of 
 money  in  his  kingdom,  without  his  special  allow- 
 ance, they  dared  not  to  enter  the  country.  In  this 
 century  were  founded  the  monasteries  of  Pluscardy, 
 Beauly,  and  Archattan,  the  nunneries  of  Hadding- 
 ton and  North  Berwick,  the  Abbey  of  Culross, 
 and  another  in  Galloway,  and  the  famed  cross  of 
 Peebles.  Gilbert,  Earl  of  Strathearn,  bestowed 
 one-third  of   his  estate  on  the   see  of  Dumblane, 
 
 and  another  on  the  abbey  of  Inchaffray. From 
 
 the  death  of  Alexander,  in  A.  D.  1285,  to  the  end 
 of  the  next  century,  the  furious  contentions  be- 
 tween the  Bruges  and  Baliols  for  the  royal  dig- 
 
6  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 nity,  and  tlie  treacherous  invasions  and  oppressions 
 of  the  English  thereby  occasioned,  diverted  the 
 Scots  from  their  mad  sii{)erstition,  and  ahnost  de- 
 solated the  country.  Neither  party  rep^arded  the 
 Papal  mandates  of  peace,  but  as  they  tended  to 
 their  own  interests. 
 
 In   A.  n.  14-07,    Resby,   an  En<:^lishman,   and  in 
 I  K'il,   Paul  Craw,  a  Bohemian,   were  burnt  as  he- 
 retics, by  order  of   Henry  Wardlaw,    bishop  of  St. 
 Andrew's,   who  founded  an  university  there,  a!)out 
 14-12.     Bishop   Kennedy,   his   successor,    built  the 
 college   of   St.    Salvator.       Patrick   (Traham,    who 
 succeeded  him   in   1  l-(j(i,   got   himself  declared  an 
 archhislwp,   to  whom    all  the  other  ('  jcesans  were 
 required    to    be    subject.       But    their    opposition, 
 and    the    strugglings   of  Shevez   for   the    office   of 
 archdeacon,    made  him   delirious.      Shevez,    by  the 
 Pope's  assistance,  obtainec!  the  see.     He  and  lilack- 
 ater,   who  was  made  arciibishop  of  Cxlasgow  about 
 1480,    spent   their   strength    in   fierce    contentions 
 about  pre  eminence.      iMcanwhile,  some  Waldtnses 
 or  W'ickldntes,  had  taugiit  in  ti.e  counties  of  Kyle 
 and  ('unningham,  TJiatno  images  ovght  io  he  made  or 
 wurshij)])C(l :  nor  nllcs  of  saints  adored;  that  it   is 
 not  tan/ lit  tu  propagate  the  Christian  religion  In/ force; 
 that  Christ  gave  the  power  of  tnnding  and  loosing  to 
 Peter ^  hut  not  to  the  hishops  of  Home  as  his  successors: 
 that  Christ  appointid  no  clerical  consecrations ;  that 
 the  hread  and  vine  in  the  Lord's  supper  retain  their 
 original  suhstance  q/lr  their  consecration ;    that  no 
 tithes   ought  to  he  jniid  to  the  clergij ;  that  every  he- 
 lievcr  in  Christ   is  a   jirirst ;  that  the  Pope  is  not  the 
 successor  of  Peter,  unU-ss  iyi  his  Satajiical  hinderance 
 of  Christ's  work ;  that  he  deceives  the  people  with  his 
 liulU   and  Indulgences ;  that  masses  are  of  no  use 
 to  souls  in  Purtratory ;  that  clerical  hencdictions  are 
 cf  no  value;  that  the  Pope  sets  himself  above  and 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  7 
 
 against  God ;  that  he  cannot  remit  the  pains  of  Pur- 
 gatory ;  that  clerical  excommunications  are  not  to  he 
 feared;  that  it  is  never  lawful  for  Christians  to  swear; 
 that  true  Christians  every  day  feed  upon  the  body  of 
 Christ:  For  spreading  of  these  opinions,  perhaps 
 partly  misrepresented  by  their  enemies,  about  thirty 
 persons  were  summoned  before  the  privy  council. 
 But  they  answered  with  such  confidence  and  strength 
 of  reasoning,  that  it  was  thought  safest  to  dismiss 
 them. 
 
 While  king  James  IV.'s  brother  and  bastard  son 
 were  archbishops  of  St.  Andrew's,  things  w^ent  on 
 pretty  quietly.  But  after  the  death  of  the  last,  a 
 furious  contention  for  that  wealthy  see,  between 
 Dougfas  of  Dunkeld,  Forman  of  Murray,  and  Hep- 
 burn, prior  of  St.  Andrew's,  took  place.  At  last 
 Douglas  yielded,  and  Forman  obtained  it,  on  con- 
 dition of  his  paying  a  life-rent  of  3000  crowns  to 
 Hepburn.  Meanwhile,  or  afterward,  the  learned 
 doctors  of  the  university  were  busied  in  disputing. 
 Whether  the  Lord's  prayer  might  be  addressed  to 
 the  saints  !  Pretended  relics  being  in  great  repute, 
 a  Romish  pedlar,  who  had  a  large  stock  of  them, 
 opened  his  pack  near  Haddington.  Among  other 
 rarities,  he  presented  a  bell  which  had  a  rent  in  it, 
 said  to  have  been  occasioned  by  a  false  oath  ;  and 
 pretended,  that  such  w^as  its  sacred  sensibility,  that 
 if  any  person  with  his  hand  on  it,  dared  to  swear 
 falsehood,  it  would  rend,  and  the  swearer's  hand 
 cleave  to  it ;  but,  if  nothing  but  truth  w  as  sworn, 
 it  would  not  rend,  or  the  swearer's  hand  stick  to  it. 
 One  Fermor,  a  sensible  man,  bent  upon  exposing 
 this  pretence,  begged  allowance  to  swear  with  his 
 hand  on  this  beli ;  and  holding  it  up  to  the  multi- 
 tude, that  they  might  see  in  what  condition  it  and 
 his  hand  were,  he  laid  his  hand  upon  it  and  so- 
 lemnly swore,  That  the  Pope  xuas  Antichrist^  and  his 
 
S  A  roMPExnious  history  of  the 
 
 (urdinals,  ai'chb'ishops,  bislufps^  priests,  and  monks^ 
 locusts  come  from  hell  to  delude  men  from  God,  and 
 that  the}/  woidd  return  to  hell-  Lifting  his  hand 
 freely  from  the  hell,  he  held  it  up  to  the  multitude 
 that  they  nii^^ht  see  that  no  ehan^e  had  been  made 
 upon  it ;  and  that,  according  to  its  owner,  he  had 
 sworn  nothing  hut  the  truth.  The  pedlar  sli[)t  ofl* 
 ashamed,  nor  did  any  more  of  his  sort  trouble  the 
 nation. 
 
 iNTcan while,  about  A.  D.  1528,  Patrick  Hamilton, 
 abbot  of  Ferm,  having  in  Germany  drunk  in  consi- 
 derable knowledge  of  the  truth  from  Luther,  Me- 
 lancthon,  Lambert,  and  others,  he  on  his  return, 
 communicated  it  to  his  friends.  He  was  accused 
 of  maintaining,  That  mens  siji fid  corruption  of  nature 
 remained  after  their  Ijaptism ;  that  no  man  can,  by  the 
 power  of  his  own  Jree  will,  perform  any  thing  spiritu- 
 alhf  c;ood\  that  no  man  is  without  sin  in  this  life;  that 
 every  true  Christian  may  know  himself  to  be  such;  that 
 men  are  not  justified  by  good  works,  but  by  faith  only; 
 t/uit  good  works  do  not  make  a  man  good,  but  a  man 
 being  made  good  by  God^s  spirit,  performs  good 
 works ;  that  evil  works  repented  of  do  not  make  a  man 
 Intd ;  that  faith,  hope,  and  charity,  are  inseparably 
 coniweted ;  that  without  the  assistance  of  God's  gra- 
 cious influence  we  can  do  nothing  but  sin :  that  it  is 
 devilish  doctrine  to  assert,  that  mens  actual  penance 
 can  purchase  God's  pardon  of  their  sin;  that  auri- 
 cular confession  of  sin  is  not  necessary  to  salvation ; 
 that  there  is  no  Purgatory ;  that  the  Old  Testament 
 saints  were  in  heaven  Itefore  Christ^s  death  ;  that  the 
 Pope  is  Antichrist,  and  hath  no  more  power  than  any 
 ordinary  priest.  He  maintained  before  their  court, 
 that  the  f^^t  seven  of  these*  assertions  were  cer- 
 tainly true,  and  that  he  could  not  condemn  the 
 seven  last  till  he  saw  better  reason  than  ever  he 
 had  done.     He   was    therefore   condemned   to   be 
 
CHUUCH  of  SCOTLAND.  9 
 
 tnirnt.  While  he  was  in  the  flames,  Fiiar  Camp- 
 bell and  some  others  plagued  him  with  entreaties 
 to  recant.  He  solemnly  summoned  Campbell 
 speedily  to  answer  at  God's  tribunal  for  his  con- 
 duct so  contrary  to  his  own  conscience.  Campbell 
 soon  after  died  miserably,  frantic  and  desperate. 
 Mr.  Hamilton's  brother,  James,  and  his  sister,  Ka- 
 tharine, were  also  prosecuted  for  heretics :  but 
 king  James  secretly  conveyed  them  out  of  the 
 way. 
 
 While  Boethius,  principal  of  the  college  of  Aber- 
 deen, and  Mair,  professor  of  divinity,  and  afterward 
 provost  of  that  of  St.  Andrew's,  by  their  l>atin  histo- 
 ries of  their  nations,  encouraged  others  to  the  study 
 of  learning,  the  burning  of  Hamilton  roused  multi- 
 tudes to  examine  whether  his  principles  were  truth 
 or  error,  and  found  them  supported  by  Sciipture. 
 Friar  Seaton  taught,  That  the  law  of  God  is  the  onlij 
 rule  of  righteousness  ;  that  no  man  can  satisfij  for  his 
 own  sin;  that  pardon  of  it  is  only  obtained  by  true  faith 
 in  the  merits  of  Christ  and  an  unfeigned  repentance ; 
 that  the  Scripture  requires  bishops  to  preach  the  gospel. 
 Being  persecuted  by  his  superiors,  he  fled  into  Eng- 
 land. Gavin  Loggy  and  William  Airth  began  to 
 perceive  the  truth,  and  in  their  sermons  to  expose 
 the  wickedness  of  the  clergy.  Henry  Forrest  of  Lin- 
 lithgow, a  simple  priest,  who  used  an  English  New 
 Testament,  having  been  decoyed  by  his  confessor  to 
 acknowledge,  that  he  thought  Mr.  Hamilton  a  good 
 man,  and  his  articles  defensible,  he  was  treacher- 
 ously discovered,  imprisoned,  and  burnt.  Several 
 were  prosecuted  for  heresy,  but  recanted.  David 
 Straiton,  who  had  been  converted  from  a  most  fu- 
 rious and  turbulent  profligate,  and  Norman  Gour- 
 lay,  were  condemned  to  the  flames  for  their  denial 
 of  purgatory,  and  of  the  Pope's  jurisdiction  in  Scot- 
 land.    Alesse,  Fife,  iNPDougal,  and  M'Bee,  com- 
 
 VOL.  T  c 
 
10  A   COMPKNDIOUS    HISTORY  OF   THK 
 
 jirarrd  not,  hut  lied  '\ntn  V.nu;\i\m\.  After  the  death 
 of  Lord  Cromweh  the  first  three  retired  thenee  into 
 S«i\ony;  and  at  Last  Fife  returned  to  Scothand. 
 IVF'Bee  n^tired  to  Denmark,  and  \\  as  remarkably 
 useful  in  promotinc:  the  reformation  r)f  that  country. 
 In  15d8,  Killore,  Belfrai^e,  friars;  Simson,  a  priest; 
 Forrat,  a  canon  ;  and  R.  Forrester,  were  hurnt  for 
 h(Metics.  The  hishop  of  I)unk(  Id  had  warned  For- 
 rat, that  his  preachini^  every  Sabbath  rendered  him 
 suspected  of  heresy,  and  advised  him  never  to 
 ])reacli  on  the  (pistle  or  f;osj)el  of  the  day,  but  when 
 it  was  a  e^ood  one;  and  thanked  his  Maker,  that 
 lie  had  lived  well  many  years,  without  knowing" 
 cither  Old  or  New  I'estamcnt.  Russel,  a  ^rey  friar, 
 and  Kennedy,  a  young  man  of  1<S  years  of  age,  sub- 
 mitted to  the  llames  with  great  piety  and  cheerful- 
 ness, for  the  sake  of  the  truth. 
 
 .Tames  l^eaton,  archbishop  of  St.  Andrew's,  dying, 
 his  ne|)hew,  the  Cardinal,  succeeded  him.      He  im- 
 mediately commenced  a   prosecution    against    Sir 
 .Tohn  F^orthwick,  for  holding.   Thai  /he  Pope  had  no 
 greater  authority  than  other  tjtshops;  that  his  indul- 
 gences and  remissions  hut  deceived  the  people \  that  cler- 
 gyrnen  miu;ht  laitfu/lj/  marry  y  that  the  reformed  princi- 
 ples, worship,  and  government  embraced  in   England, 
 were  commendable \  that  clergipnen  ought  not  to  possess 
 temporalities,  but  kings  should  convert  ecclesiastical  re- 
 venues to  other  pious  uses ;  that  the  canon  law  can  be 
 of  no  force  ^  because  it  is  contrary  to  the  law  of  God; 
 that  the  friars  and  monks  ought  to  In'  affolished ;   that 
 thr  Pope  was  guilty  (f  simony,  in  his  setting  of  spiri- 
 tual things : — as  also  for    refusing  to  acknowledge 
 the  Popf's  authority,  and  for  reading  and  distiibut- 
 ing  copies  «.r  the  Knglish  New  Testament,  and  other 
 heretical  books,      l^ut   to  save    himself    from    the 
 flames  Sir  .lohn  eseajied  into  Fnglaiui. 
 
 King  ilcnry  VTH.   of  England,   having  sent  to 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  11 
 
 his  nephew,  king  James  V.  some  books  of  the  Eng- 
 lish Reformers  for  his  illumination,  and  solicited  a 
 friendly  meeting  with  him  at  York,  in  order  to  ad- 
 vise him  to  a  similar  reformation  of  religion  in  Scot- 
 land, the  Scotch  clergy,  dreading  the  most  fatal  con- 
 sequences to  themselves,  warmly  remonstrated  to 
 James,  how  offensive  such  an  interview  with  his 
 heretical  uncle  would  be  to  his  Holiness  and  all 
 good  men  ;  and  how  dangerous  to  himself.     They 
 promised    him    an  yearly  compliment    of    50,000 
 crowns,    and    insisted    that,    by    confiscating    the 
 estates  of  such  noblemen   as  Avere  guilty  of  heresy 
 and  rebellion,  he  might  raise  100,000  more.     Per- 
 suaded   by  their    solicitations,    he    declared    war 
 against  his  uncle.     Some  terrible  visions,   and    the 
 death  of  his  two  sons  in  one  day,  were  thought  to 
 be  warnings  from  God  against  proceeding  in   this 
 war. — He  had  no  sooner  heard  of  the  defeat  and 
 shameful  rout  of  his  army  of  10,000,  who,  under 
 Oliver  Sinclair,     had    marched  into   England,    by 
 about  four  or  five  hundred   undisciplined  peasants, 
 than  he  died  of  grief,  A.  D.  154'^.     Not  long  after, 
 the  Committee  of  Estates   allowed  the  nation  to 
 read  the  English  Bible,  till  the  bishops  should  pub- 
 lish a  better.     But  cardinal  Beaton,   having  got  a 
 testament  forged  for  the  late  king,  which  declared 
 himself  the   principal  Regent  of  the  kingdom,  for 
 Mary  the  royal  infant;  and  having  got  out  of  prison, 
 and  even  decoyed  Hamilton,  Earl  of  Arran  into  his 
 views,  he  commenced  a  furious  persecution  of  the 
 protestant  heretics,   particularly  in    Perth.     Some 
 were  executed,  others  banished,  and  Lord  Ruthven 
 deprived  of  his  provostship.     In  Angus  many  were 
 prosecuted  for  reading  the  New  Testament,  which 
 was  pretended  to  have    been    forged    by  Luther- 
 Some  were  executed  for  refusing  to  pray  to  the 
 
J  2  A  COMPKNDIOUS    HISTOHY  01    TUF, 
 
 Vir;4'ln  IVFary;  and  five,   on  suspicion  that  they  had 
 eaton  a  goose  on  Fr'ulajf. 
 
 Jn  J.5H',  (xcorpc    Wishart,    a  native  of  Mearns, 
 ljef;^an  to  preaeh  the  izospel,  es])ecially  at  Montrose 
 and  Dundee.      Beaton  drove  him   from    the    hitter, 
 but  not  till  he  had   warned   the   inhabitants,   that 
 God  would  speedily  punish  their   coi\tenipt   of  the 
 gospel.      To  the  inexprest^ible  vexation  of  the  arch- 
 bishop of  Glasgow,  Wishart,  with  great   zeal,   and 
 no  inconsiderable   success,  retired  to   the    west   of 
 Scotland,  and  there  i)reached    the   glad   tidings   of 
 salvation.      Being  informed  there,   that  on  the  4th 
 day  after  he  had  left  Dundee,   the  plague  had  bro- 
 ken out  among  the  inhabitants,  he   hastened   back 
 to  them  with  the  ofiers  of  mercy,    in  the  midst  of 
 their    distress.     He    soon    afterward    preached    at 
 1  laddington,  and  observing,  that  though  thousands 
 attciulcd  a   stage  play,  yet  scarce    an  hundred   at- 
 tended liis  sermons,    he  denounced    the    vengeance 
 of  (toJ  against  the  inhabitants ;  which   soon    after 
 overtook  them  bv  means  of  the  French  and  Knijlish 
 in  the  siege  and  deience  of  the  place.  After  several 
 narrow  escajx^s,  he  was  apprehended  at  Ormiston 
 in  l^ast  Lothian.     Contrary  to  the  solemn  promise 
 of  Bothwel  his  apprchender,  he  was  at  last  delivered 
 up  to   Cardinal    Beaton,    carried   to  St.  Andrew's, 
 and  there  condemned  to  be   burnt.      After  he   had 
 received  the  Lord's  su])per  in  his   prison,    together 
 with  the  caj)tain  of  the  castle,  he  cheerfully  suffer- 
 ed, foretelling  the  uidiai)py  death  of  the  Cardinal, 
 whi),  Irom  his    window,    pleased   himself  with   the 
 view  of  his  torments ; — as  be  had   formerly  done 
 the  remarkable  illumination  of  the   kingdom    with 
 the  g(Kpi  I  of  Christ. 
 
 To  tlie  great  satisfaction  of  the  Popish  elergy, 
 Beaton  had  appointed  that  none  should  pray  for 
 the  soul  of  the  heretical  \Vi<liart.  under  tliehii^hest 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  13 
 
 pains.     But  not  lon^  after,  two  Leslies,    William 
 Kirkaldy,  James  Melvil,  and  a  few  others,  surprised 
 the  Cardinal  in  his  castle,  and  having  killed  him, 
 showed  him  to  the  mob   from  that  very    window 
 from  which  he  had  glutted  his  cruel  eyes  with  the 
 burning  of  Wishart.     In  killing  him,  James  Melvil 
 solemnly  protested   to   him,  that  he   bore   him   no 
 private  grudge,  but  laboured  to  avenge  his  treacher- 
 ous and  horrid  murder  of  that  man  of  God.     The 
 conspirators  and  their  friends,   to  the   number   of 
 about  140,   defended  themselves  in  the  castle,   till 
 they  obtained  a  capitulation.  John  Rough,  an  Eng- 
 lishman, was  their  preacher  in  the  castle,  and  after- 
 w^ard  John  Knox,  a  native  of  East  Lothian,  came 
 and  assisted  him.     They  were  accused  of  preaching 
 in  the  castle  and  town.   That  no  mortal  inan  can  he 
 head  of  the  church;  that  the  Pope  is  Antichrist,  and 
 not  so  much  as  a  member  of  Christ'' s  mystical  body ; 
 that  every  man  is  bound  to  receive  the  religion  received 
 from  God\  that  the  sacraments  ought  to  be  administered 
 in  the  manner  prescribed  by  Christ,  and  exemplified 
 by  his  apostles,  that  the  Mass  is  abominable  idolatry y 
 and  a  blasphemous  reproach  of  our  Saviour* s  death; 
 that  such  bishops  as  do  not  preach  are  not  true  ones; 
 that  the  law  of  God  doth  not  necessarily  appropriate 
 the  tithes  to  the  clergy.     But  as  Mair,  the  provost  of 
 the  university  and  prior  of  the  abbey,  favoured  their 
 tenets,  they  escaped  with  an  admonition.     Rough 
 returned  to  England,  and  there,  by  Bonner's  influ- 
 ence, died  a  martyr  in  1,557. 
 
 Notwithstanding  their  capitulation,  the  besieged 
 judging  the  Pontifical  remission  obtained  for  them 
 insufficient,  refused  to  surrender  the  castle,  and 
 were  therefore  anew  besieged,  and  at  last  obliged 
 to  surrender  on  the  sole  condition  of  having  their 
 lives  spared.  In  1550,  Knox  and  others  of  them, 
 who  had  been  put  into  gallie$  or  prisons,  were  li- 
 
14  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 IxTatiii  in  cnnsfNiucncc  of  the  remarkable  victory 
 ot  the  Kn^hsh  at  iMusselhur^h.  But  no  sooner 
 hiu\  tho  Scotch  managers  obtained  peace  from  the 
 Enc^bsh,  than  thiy  renewed  their  persecntion  of 
 the  lVot('>tants.  Adam  Wallace,  a  simple  man, 
 beini;  apprehended  at  Winton  in  East  Lothian, 
 was  condemned  and  burnt  for  teaching  his  ncii^^h- 
 bours,  and  for  baptizin^^  his  own  child  for  want  of 
 a  faithful  minister;  and  for  denial  of  Purf^atory  ; 
 and  for  maintaining  that  prayers  for  the  dead  were 
 superstitious,  the  mass  an  idolatrous  service,  and 
 the  bread  and  w  ine  in  the  Lord's  Supper  not  turned 
 into  the  body  an<i  blood  of  Christ.  Notvvithstand- 
 inir  their  hard  work  in  determining  how  the  Lord's 
 prayer  should  be  directed  to  God,  and  how^  to  the 
 saints,  the  clergy  found  time  to  publish  a  most  piti- 
 lul  explication  of  it,  and  of  the  ten  commandments, 
 which,  from  its  price,  was  called  the  Tivopcnnn 
 Vculh 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLA.ND.  15 
 
 CHAPTER  11. 
 
 Protestant  Reformation  pushed  on  hy  Knox — Promoted  hij 
 the  Nobility  and  others,  opposed  hy  the  Queen  Regent — 
 Established  hy  the  Parliament,  A.  D.  1560 — Confession 
 of  Faith — First  hool'  of  Discipline — Reformation  car- 
 ried on  hy  the  M'misters  and  others  in  ojiposition  to 
 Queen  Mary — and  binder  the  Earl  of  Murray  further 
 established.  Morton  attempts  to  introduce  Prelatic  Church 
 Oovernment,  but  is  opposed  hy  Knox,  who  soon  after 
 died — and  others.     Second  hook  of  Discipline  is  f aimed. 
 
 I^KTURNiNG  fi'om  England,  on  account  of  the 
 Marian  persecution,  there  begun  John  Willock  and 
 John  Knox,  along  with  Harlow  an  Englishman, 
 preached  the  gospel,  and  declaimed  against  the 
 abominations  of  Popery.  The  clergy  quickly  com- 
 menced a  process  against  Knox,  and  soon  after 
 against  the  other  preachers.  But  so  many  of  their 
 friends  attended  them  at  their  trial,  and  even  in 
 the  Regents  presence  threatened  to  avenge  the 
 injury  done  them  on  their  prosecutors,  as  quite 
 dispirited  them,  and  made  them  glad  to  desert  the 
 diet.  At  the  request  of  his  old  congregation  there, 
 Knox  retired  to  Geneva,  and  thence  directed  his 
 appeal  to  the  nobles,  gentry,  and  Commons  of  Scot- 
 land, from  the  bisho[)s,  who  had  raised  a  new  pro- 
 cess against  him  in  his  absence,  and  burnt  him  in 
 effigy.  Much  about  the  same  time  he  directed 
 his  appeal  to  a  free  General  Council,  and  to  the 
 Xiueen  Regent  and  her  subjects. 
 
)G  A   CO.MPI'.NDIOUS   inSTOriY  OF  Tlin 
 
 Dnry,  hislioj)  of  (Talloway,  and  Pantlier  of  Ross, 
 two  principal  persecutors,  dyinf;  as  brutes,  the 
 buri^hs  of  Dundee,  Pertli,  Montrose,  Cupar,  St. 
 Andrew's,  Mdinhur^d),  Stirlinij^,  an(i  otiiers ; — not  a 
 lew  ol'  the  nobility,  the  (hike  of  Chastleraull,  now 
 Hamilton,  the  earls  of  Ar^yle,  Glencairn,  Arran, 
 INTonteith,  Uothes,  Marshal,  and  Morton ;  Lord 
 .lames  Stewart,  afterward  T.arl  of  Murray ;  the 
 Lords  Lorn,  Ruthvcn,  Lindsay,  Ochiltree,  Boyd, 
 Gray,  Yester,  and  Sancjuh.'ir;  Sir  David  Lindsay, 
 Sir  James  Sandilands,  and  other  gentry,  with  mul- 
 titudes of  the  commons  of  Cunningham,  Kyle, 
 Carrick,  Angus,  INIurray,  Lothian,  Fife,  and  Strath- 
 crn,  instructed  by  Knox  and  other  preachers,  and 
 by  reading  the  Scripture  and  Christian  conference, 
 ])egan  to  detest  the  clerical  tyranny,  an(i  to  doubt 
 of  the  lawfulness  of  attending  ^lass,  or  offering 
 their  children  to  Popish  bajitism,  or  of  assisting 
 Government  in  their  maintenance  of  Popish  idola- 
 try, or  persecuting  men  for  their  adherence  to  truth; 
 or  even  of  cpiietly  permitting  their  fellow-subjects 
 to  be  murdered  for  the  sake  of  religion.  They 
 quickly  perceived  it  to  be  their  duty,  to  make  an 
 open  confession  of  their  faith,  and  to  attempt  a 
 reformation  from  these  evils,  of  which  they  had 
 secretly  complained.  Being  convinced  of  their 
 obligation  to  exert  themselves  to  their  utmost  for 
 the  abolishment  of  idolatry,  superstition,  and  ty- 
 ranny, and  to  promote  the  pure  administration  of 
 gospel  do(  triiies  and  worshij),  they  resolved  to  exa- 
 mine their  own  strength.  Lor  this  purpose,  while 
 they  agreed  to  hold  social  meetings  at  set  times  for 
 prayer  and  reading  of  the  Scriptures,  till  they  could 
 be  pruvitlcHl  with  preachers,  and  Argyle  and  others 
 took  preachers  into  their  families, — they  employed 
 some  of  their  most  proper  hands,  especially  in  Fife 
 and  .Vn^nis,  to  travel  through  the  kingdon),  and  sq- 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  1*7 
 
 3icit  the  nobility,  gentlemen,  and  burojiers,  to 
 make  an  open  confession  of  the  truth,  and  to  assist 
 one  another  in  the  defence  of  it.  Tliese  agents 
 appear  to  have  carried  about  with  them  forvis  of 
 an  association^  to  be  subscribed  by  such  as  inclined. 
 Soon  after,  they  elected  rulin^^  elders  among  them, 
 to  whom  they  promised  subjection  in  the  Lord. 
 From  their  frequent  meetini^s,  they  be^an  to  be 
 called  the  Congregation.  Laying  thejr  account 
 v/ith  persecution  from  the  Popish  clergy  and  their 
 supporters,  several  noblemen  and  others,  in  A.  O. 
 1557,  entered  into  a  solemn  covenant  to  promote 
 the  reformation  of  religion,  and  to  defend  each 
 other  in  so  doing;  which  was  subscribed  by  the 
 Earls  of  Argyle,  Glencairn,  and  Morton ;  Lord 
 Lorn,  John  Frskine  of  Dun,  Si^c. 
 
 Finding,  by  the  return  of  their  copies  of  asso- 
 <:iation,  which  they  had  sent  through  the  kingdom, 
 that  their  reforming  intentions  were  approven  by 
 the  most  of  the  nation,  they  appointed  Sir  James 
 Sandilands  to  present  their  requests  to  the  Queen 
 Regent,  and  to  insist,  that  public  prayers,  and  the 
 administration  of  the  sacraments,  should  be  in  their 
 own  language;  that  ministers  should  be  elected  by 
 their  people ;  that  the  life  and  doctrine  of  candi- 
 dates for  the  holy  ministry  should  be  carefully  tried, 
 and  all  ministers  ignorant  or  scandalous,  deposed, 
 and  others  that  were  fit  substituted  in  their  stead. 
 They  represented  to  her,  the  reasonableiiess  of  their 
 open  confession  of  their  principles,  and  of  their 
 protecting  one  another  against  the  cruelty  of  the 
 Popish  priests.  In  order  to  procure  their  consent 
 to  the  settlement  of  the  crown  upon  the  daup.hin 
 of  France,  who  had  lotely  marri'r'd  her  da'.ghter 
 Mary,  the  heir  of  it,  the  Queen  Regent  pretended 
 to  allow  them  their  pubbc  worship  in  their  own 
 language,   providing  that  it  should  be  performed 
 
 VOL.  I.  D 
 
18  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY   Oh    THK 
 
 without  any  tninuUs, — and  that  thtir  prcaclieis 
 should  not  ofiiciato  publicly  in  Edinhur^^h  or 
 J.cith. 
 
 l^ut  thr  I'.arl  oC  Ar^-yks  after  much  f'aitliful  re- 
 sistance of  the  Archbishop's  solicitations,  havin[( 
 (lied,  u  itnes^iiii;  to  the  truth,  and  other  well  ai- 
 fectctl  noblemen  bein^-  removed,  probably  by  poi- 
 son, in  France, — the  Popish  clerg'y,  j)rovoked  by 
 the  above  concessions,  and  secretly  countenanced  by 
 the  <^ueen  liCi^ent,  resumed  their  courage  in  15.5N, 
 and  fell  upon  Walter  Mill,  an  a,i,a'd  priest.  Firmly 
 adherini;  to  the  truth,  he  was  condemned  to  the 
 flames,  \\  hich  lie  endured  with  remarkable  cheer- 
 fulness. Mis  speech  at  the  stake  left  a  very  deep 
 impression  on  the  minds  of  spectators.  They  also 
 procured  a  sentence  of  outlawry  and  banishment 
 against  Paul  iVIethven,  who  had  preached  about 
 Dundee  and  other  places  of  An^^-us.  But  notwith- 
 i^tanding-  all  their  malice,  the  people  attended  his 
 sermons,  and  afforded  him  necessary  support.  At 
 first,  the  Popish  doctors  offered  a  public  disputation 
 on  the  [)oints  of  difference.  But  as  the  llcformcd 
 insisted  that  the  Scriptures^  not  the  canon  law, 
 should  be  the  standard  of  judi^ment,  and  that  their 
 banished  brethren  should  be  allowed  to  assist  at  it, 
 they  refused  to  comply  with  their  terms. 
 
 In  conse(|uence  of  Knox's  j)ublishetl  a|)peal  from 
 the  clerical  decision  at^ainst  him,  the  Lortls,  and 
 other  principal  men  of  the  con«;rei;ation,  insisted, 
 that  the  laws  em|)owerin<;  the  bishops  to  proceed 
 against  heretics,  should  be  re}>ealed  ;  that  nothin^^ 
 should  be  reckoned  hcrcsi/,  but  what  was  contrary 
 to  the  fundamental  doctrines  of  (iod's  word  ;  and 
 that  su{  h  as  were  prosecuted  for  it  before  civil 
 judL^cs,  should  be  allowed  to  except  ai;ainst  the  wit- 
 nesses, an(J  j)ropose  their  own  delences,  as  well  as 
 other  criminals.    The  Queen  Kegent  kept  their  pe- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  19 
 
 lition  in  her  pocket,  pretending  that  it  was  not  ex- 
 pedient to  have  it  read  in  parliament,  as  the  cleri- 
 cal members  would  oppose  her  designs  ;  and  tliat  it 
 would  be  more  proper,  first  to  procure  the  favour 
 of  the  convocation.  The  Lords  yielded  for  the 
 time:  but,  before  the  parliament  was  dissolved, 
 they  solemnly  protested,  That,  since  they  could  not 
 obtain  a  just  reformation  according  to  the  word  of 
 God,  it  should  be  lawful  for  them  to  believe  and  act 
 in  mattersof  religion,  as  they  could  answer  to  God  and 
 theirownconscience,tilloncethe  Popish  clergyshould 
 prove  themselves  true  ministers  of  Christ,  and  purge 
 themselves  of  such  crimes  as  they  were  ready  to 
 lay  to  their  charge  ;  that  no  Protestant  should  in- 
 cur any  danger  for  non-observance  of  the  laws  and 
 rites  of  the  Popish  church  ;  that  as  they  desired  no- 
 thing but  an  orderly  reformation  of  religion,  no  tu- 
 mults, occasioned  by  the  diversity  of  religions,  or 
 violent  reformation  of  abuses,  should  be  imputed  to 
 them.  But,  by  her  fair  promises  to  remember  these 
 points,  and  to  rectify  matters  to  their  satisfaction, 
 the  Queen  Regent  prevented  the  marking  of  their 
 protest  in  the  minutes  of  Parliament. 
 
 It  was  easily  foreseen  that  all  application  for  re- 
 dress to  the  Convocation,  in  which  the  principal 
 corrupters  of  religion,  and  whose  carnal  interest 
 was  closely  connected  with  the  corruptions  com- 
 plained of,  had  the  sole  sway,  could  be  to  no  pur- 
 pose. The  Queen  Regent  having  got  her  point, 
 relative  to  the  settlement  of  the  crown  on  Fran- 
 cis, her  son-in-law  and  countryman,  settled,  and 
 being  offended  with  the  freedom  of  some  of  the  Re- 
 formed, gave  plain  hints  of  her  intention  to  crush 
 them,  and  to  make  examples  of  some  of  their  chiefs, 
 in  order  to  terrify  the  rest.  Accordingly,  in  next 
 spring  1559  she  issued  a  proclamation,  requiring  all 
 her  subjects  to  observe  the  festival  of  Easter,  in  the 
 
20  A  COMPRNDTOrS  HISTORY  OF   TIIK 
 
 W'ontod  Popish  miinner.  Snrli  ministers  as  refused 
 compliance  were  summoned  !)efV)rp  her  privy  coun- 
 cil at  Stirling,  on  the  lOth  of  jMay.  The  Hefor- 
 incrs  SI  nt  tlie  earl  of  (ilenrairn  and  Sir  Iluf^h  Camp- 
 bell to  solicit  her  favour  to  their  ministers,  and  to 
 put  her  in  mind  erf  lier  |)romises.  Bnt  she  iold  ihcm 
 in  a  fury,  that  in  despite  of  all  their  supporters, 
 these  ministers  should  be  banished  from  the  kin^- 
 don).  and  that  the  promises  of  princes  ivere  not  to 
 be  uroed  upon  them  any  further  than  consistent 
 v»  ith  their  own  convenience.  I'he  commissioners 
 replied,  that  if  she  renf)iniced  her  jironiises  to  them, 
 they  would  renounce  their  subjection  to  her;  and 
 desired  her  seriously  to  ponder  the  consequences. 
 rindini;  that  vast  multitudes,  chiefly  from  Angus 
 and  Mearns,  were  on  their  way  to  attend  the  minis- 
 ters at  their  trial,  and  to  n^ake  an  open  confession 
 of  their  faith,  and  being  advanced  to  IVrth.  had 
 «ent  John  Krskine  of  l)un  to  assure  her  of  their 
 j)eacea!)le  ai)proach,  she,  by  flattery,  and  solemnly 
 declaring  that  the  diet  of  council  against  the  mi- 
 nisters should  be  deserted,  and  nothing  done  to 
 their  j>rejudice,  engaged  him  to  persuade  his  con- 
 stitui-nts  to  stop,  and  disperse  themselves  home- 
 ward. ViUt  no  sooner  had  she  heard  of  their  return, 
 than  she  held  the  meeting  of  council,  and  outlawed 
 th(  ministers  in  their  absence.  Highly  oftcnded 
 w  ivh  her  (iiiisian  treachery,  and  some  other  attempts 
 to  niin  her  Protestant  subjects,  Erskine  posted  to 
 Perth,  c\cuseri  his  former  advice  relative  to  their 
 dispL'i-sion,  informed  them  of  the  Regent's  proce- 
 dure against  their  ministers,  and  warned  them  to 
 prcj)an'  tor  the  woi-st. 
 
 A   nudtituile  of  the  Koformed   quickly  reosseni- 
 
 Wed  at  Perth  ;  and  Knox,  having  just  returned  tVoui 
 
 Geneva,  pn'ached  a  warm  distourse  against  the  I'o- 
 
 pish  idoblry.      lie  had  scarce  iinished  it,  when  a 
 
 6 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  21 
 
 presumptuous  priest  began  to  celebrate  high  mass^ 
 and  struck  a  boy,  who  exclaimed  against  his  unsuf- 
 ferable  impudence.  A  tumult  immediately  ensued, 
 and  every  monument  of  idolatry  in  that  church  was 
 destroyed.  The  mob,  assembling,  fell  on  the  mo- 
 nasteries, destroyed  all  the  monuments  of  idolatry 
 they  could  find,  and  levelled  the  buildings  almost 
 with  the  ground  ;  but  permitted  the  monks  to  carry 
 off  the  spoil.  Not  one  of  the  protestants  took  for 
 his  own  use  the  value  of  a  groat.  The  inhabitants 
 of  Cupar  in  Fife  and  other  places,  served  the  mo- 
 numents of  idolatry  in  much  the  same  manner.  In- 
 formed of  these  things,  the  Regent  vowed  to  de- 
 stroy  every  inhabitant  of  Perth,  man,  woman,  and 
 child,  and  to  burn  the  town  to  an  heap  of  ashes, 
 and  sow  the  place  with  salt.  She  represented  the 
 Protestants  as  intending  nothing  but  rebellion.  To 
 refute  her  calumnies,  the  principal  Reformers  made 
 her  a  solemn  offer  of  wonted  obedience,  providing 
 they  could  have  the  word  of  God  truly  preached  to 
 them,  and  the  sacraments  rightly  administered. 
 They  certified  her,  that  if  she  did  not  put  a  stop  to 
 her  cruelty,  they  would  defend  their  brethren,  take 
 arms  against  their  enemies,  and  manifest  their 
 innocence  to  Francis  and  Mary  their  sovereigns, 
 and  to  other  Christian  princes.  They  warned  her 
 French  troops,  that  if  they  attacked  them,  it  should 
 be  at  their  perd.  They  entreated  the  Popish  Lords 
 to  refrain  their  fury  till  their  cause  should  be  tried, 
 and  they  have  opportunity  to  manifest  the  abomin- 
 able practices  of  the  Romish  priests,  and  the  false- 
 ness of  their  religion.  They  warned  the  Protes- 
 tants, that  if  any  of  them  should  take  arms  against 
 their  brethren,  they  should  be  held  traitors  to  God^ 
 and  excommunicated  from  their  society.  They 
 boldly  declared,  that,  with  God's  assistance,  they 
 would  defend  themselves  and  their  brethren  against 
 
22  A  coMrENnior:^  iiisronv  of  the 
 
 tlicir  enemies, though  t(  n  t  imcs  their  number.  TJicsc 
 resolute  declarations  o(  the  master  of  Lindsay,  lairds 
 of  Halvaird  nnd  I.undy,  and  some  other  barons  of 
 Angus  and  I'ile,  made  a  deep  inijnession  tm  some 
 of  the  Regent's  adherents.  They  began  to  doubt 
 of  the  lawfulness  of  persecuting  men,  who  oHered 
 all  due  obedience  to  civil  authority,  and  required 
 nothing  but  liberty  of  conscience,  and  to  have  their 
 religion  tried  by  the  word  of  (»od.  As  the  prelates, 
 and  their  clerical  agents,  to  their  utmost,  suppressed 
 the  spread  of  their  petitions,  and  inflamed  their  fel- 
 low subjects  against  them,  the  Jieformers  publisii- 
 cd  a  declaration,  bearing.  That  if  they  persevered 
 iu  such  conduct,  and  did  not  mitigate  those  ^^  horn 
 they  had  inflamed,  they  would  apprehend  them, 
 wherever  they  could  find  them,  and  treat  them  as 
 ()[)en  enemies  to  God  and  man  ;  and  that  they  would 
 make  no  peace  with  them,  till  they  should  desist 
 from  their  public  idolatry  and  cruel  persecution  of 
 God's  chiMren. 
 
 Iniormed  that  nuiltitudcs  were  marching  from 
 the  south-west  parts  of  the  kingdom  to  join  this  re- 
 solute body, — and  finding  that  lord  James  Stewart, 
 prior  ol  St.  Andiew's,  the  bastard  brother  of  (iueen 
 Mary,  and  the  earl  of  Argyle,  who  had  married  her 
 bastard  sister,  her  commissioners  to  the  congrega- 
 tion at  Terth,  were  convinced  that  their  Protestant 
 brethren  had  bein  falsely  charged  with  rebellious 
 intentions,  the  Regent  and  d'Oselle,  her  IVeneh  ge- 
 neral, re>olved  to  strike  u[)  an  agreement  with  them 
 upon  as  liard  terms  as  possible.  lUit  the  Marl  of 
 (ilencairn,  with  'J 'AX)  of  his  friends,  having,  with 
 almost  in(  redible  expedition, marchcdovei  the  moun- 
 tains westward  of  Stirling,  canu'  up  before  it  was 
 fjni>hed,  and  obliged  her  to  grant  more  advantage- 
 ous terms,  vi::.  'J'hat  none  of  the  towns  should  be 
 challenged  for  destroying  the  monuments  of  idola- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND  32 
 
 try  ;  that  the  profession  and  practice  of  the  Protes- 
 tant religion  should  be  freely  allowed  through  the 
 whole  kingdom  ;  that  no  French  soldiers  should 
 come  within  three  miles  of  Perth  ;  and  that  all 
 other  matters  should  he  left  to  the  determination 
 of  the  Parliament.  But  the  Reformers  returning 
 to  their  own  homes,  the  Regent  was  scarcely  ad- 
 mitted into  Perth,  when  she  changed  the  magis- 
 trates, fined  and  banished  many  of  the  inhabitants, 
 and  left  behind  her  a  guard  of  Scotch  soldiers  in 
 French  pay. 
 
 Before  their  departure  from    Perth,  the   Refor- 
 mers had  solemnlij  covenanted  ]om\\y  to  promote  the 
 reformation  of  religion  in  the  nation,  and  to  defend 
 one  another  in  so  doing.    The  Earls  of  Argyle  and 
 Glencairn,Lord  James  Stewart,  Boyd, Ochiltree,  &c. 
 subscribed  it.     Argyle,  and  Lord  James  Stewart, 
 who  had  mediated  in  order  to  obtain  the  late  treaty, 
 Lord  Ruthven,  the  Earl  of  Monteith,  and  the  laird 
 of  Tullibarden,  finding  that  it  had  been  so  shame- 
 fully violated,  deserted  the  Regent  ;    and  the  two 
 first,  with  their  assistants,  destroyed  the  monuments 
 of  idolatry  at  St.  Andrew's,  Stirling,  Linlithgow, 
 and  Edinburgh,  and  set  up  the  reformed  worship ; 
 and  restored  it  at  Perth.     She  thought  to  have  cut 
 them  off  at  St.  Andrew's  :  but  being  informed  of 
 her  design,  they  offered  battle  to  her  troops  at 
 Ciipar  moor.       She  fled   to  Dunbar,  though    her 
 forces  were  ten  to  one  of  her  opponents  :  but  being 
 informed   that  many  of  the  Reformers  had  gone 
 home,  she  in  vain  attempted  to  surprise  the  Pro- 
 testant lords  at  Edinburgh.      Nevertheless,  as  she 
 had  the  castle,  and  the  French  troops  on  her  side, 
 they  entered  into  a  new  treaty  with  her,  bearing, 
 that  no  Protestants   should  be  molested  for  what 
 innovations    they  had    made,    till  the    parliament 
 should  settle  these  matters,  and  none  of  their  mi- 
 
Qif  A    COMPENDIOUS    HISTOnV   OF    THK 
 
 r.istcis  hv  hindered  from  prearhin£^;  that  the  Po[)ihb 
 iilolatjy  shuuUl  not  he  restored,  where  it  iiad  been 
 suppressed  ;  and  that  no  soldiers  should  be  quar- 
 tereil  in  Kdinhur^h.  'J'lje  Reformers  would  not 
 admit  the  mass  to  Ije  celebrated  in  that  city  ;  but 
 the  Re^^nt  restored  it  at  Leith  and  llolyrood- 
 housc.  The  Duke  of  Chatelcrault  havin^^  returned 
 to  them,  and  his  son  the  Earl  of  Arran  having 
 joinwl  them,  the  Protestant  lords  again  vovcnantcd 
 to  assist  and  defend  one  another  in  the  mainten- 
 ance of  their  religion.  I^ut  the  Regent  receiving 
 a  reiniorcement  of  French  trooj)s,  resolved  to  force 
 them  back  to  the  Romish  delusions.  After  some 
 missives  had  been  exchanged,  the  war  began.  'Y\\v 
 Regent's  troops  w<?re  stationed  at  Leith,  and  those 
 of  the  lords'  at  Edinburgh.  The  lords  declared 
 Jier  suspcfidcd  from  her  regency,  on  account  of  her 
 Jiahitual  disregard  of  the  welfare  of  her  subjects, 
 and  her  oj)i)ression  of  them  by  French  troops. 
 Jiut  the  necessity  of  their  affairs,  and  the  desertion 
 of  some  of  their  party  to  her,  obliged  them  to  re- 
 retreat  to  Stirling  in  no  small  perplexity.  Here 
 Knox,  in  a  sermon,  sharply  reproved  them  for 
 putting  their  trust  in  the  Duke  of  Chatelcrault  and 
 Jiis  son,  rather  than  in  Ciod,  who  had  formerly 
 enable<l  them  to  perform  what  appeared  far  beyond 
 thtir  ability  ;  and  Ur  encouraged  them  to  pray  and 
 bopt;  that  he  Nsould  lurtlier  interpose  in  their  ta- 
 vour.  'J'hey  applied  to  (JucH-'n  Elizabeth  of  Eng- 
 laml  for  sume  assistaiue  in  men  and  money.  A 
 .*»um  of  m(»ney  u  as  sent  them;  but  Hothwel,  a 
 friend  of  tJ>e  Regent,  took  it  by  the  way.  About 
 eight  thousand  English  also  came  to  their  aid. 
 The  lonls  having  renewed  their  nuilual  covenant, 
 Bolcmtily  engaged  to  concur  with  them  in  expelling 
 the  Flench,  whom  they  besiegul  in  Leith,  with 
 considerable    loss    on    buth    side*.       The    Fri-nch 
 
CHl/RCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  25 
 
 troops,  having  repulsed  the  allies,  and  slain  a  con- 
 siderable  number  of  them,  piled  up  their  naked 
 bodies  along  the  side  of  the  wall.  The  Regent, 
 from  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  beholding  the  horrid 
 spectacle,  was  transported  with  joy,  and  cried. 
 That  it  was  the  finest  tapestry  ever  she  had  seen ; 
 ^nd  wished  that  all  the  fields  between  Leith  and 
 the  castle  were  adorned  in  like  manner  Not  long 
 after,  she  died  of  a  shameful  and  loathsome  distem- 
 per, lamenting  the  misery  which  she  had  brought 
 on  her  subjects,  by  employing  French  troops  against 
 them,  and  professing  that  she  expected  salvation 
 only  through  the  blood  of  Christ.  As  she  could 
 not  obtain  Popish  funeral  in  Scotland,  her  corpse, 
 after  about  five  months,  was  transported  to  France. 
 After  a  short  truce,  a  treaty  of  peace  was  finish- 
 ed in  July  1560,  between  Queen  Elizabeth  of  Eng- 
 land and  Francis  and  Mary  of  Scotland,  in  which 
 the  interest  of  our  Reformers  were  included ;  and 
 the  articles  of  which  were,  That  Francis  and  Mary 
 should  never  more  claim  the  sovereignty  of  Eng- 
 land or  Ireland,  and  should  erase  the  royal  arms  of 
 these  kingdoms  from  all  their  escutcheons  and 
 household  furniture;  that  the  transactions  of  the  pre- 
 ceding year  should  be  buried  in  oblivion,  on  both 
 sides;  that  both  French  and  English  forces  should 
 return  home  with  all  convenient  speed;  that  Francis 
 and  Mary  should  make  no  war  without  the  advice 
 of  their  privy  council  and  estates  of  Parliament; 
 nor  any  of  the  Scotch  nobility  assemble  soldiers,  in 
 any  case  not  allowed  by  the  laws  and  customs  of 
 the  country,  without  consent  of  their  Sovereign  and 
 his  council;  that  no  foreigners  should  be  put  into 
 places  of  power  or  trust ;  and  that  a  free  parliament 
 should  meet  in  August  next,  for  settling  the  reli- 
 gion and  liberties  of  the  kingdom. 
 
 VOL.  I.  F. 
 
^    OO.MPENDKH'S   HlbTOllY   OF   THE 
 
 After  obscrvinLT  a  solrnin  thank?<;ivini^  to  God 
 for  their  reinarkaljle  ilclivcranre,  the  Ueforniers 
 disposeil  of  their  twelve  prineipal  preaehers  to  the 
 best  advaiitai^e,  John  Knox  to  Mdinhiiri^li ;  (Muis- 
 topher  (iootlinan  to  St.  Andrew's;  Adam  Uerriot 
 to  Aberdeen;  Jolin  Row  to  Perth;  William  Chris- 
 tison  to  Dundee  ;  David  Fcriruson  to  Dunfermline: 
 and  Paid  Methven  to  .Kdhur^h;  John  Spotswood 
 was  apjiointed  superintendent  of  Lothian  and 
 IMersc;  John  Winram  of  Fifr;  John  Er>kint'  of  Dun 
 of  An^-us  and  Meanis  ;  John  Wilhjck  oi  Clydsdalc 
 and  y\ir,  and  places  adjacent;  and  John  Carswel  of 
 Ariivleshire  and  the  Western  Isle^'. 
 
 The  estates  of  Parliament  assembled  Aii^-nst 
 1560;  but  as  Francis  and  Mar}  liad  not  fulfilled 
 their  promise,  in  sendini;  up  a  commissioner  to  re- 
 present them  in  it,  there  was  some  dispute  whether 
 its  meeting  was  lawful  and  valid.  Hut  it  was  at 
 last  resolved  in  the  aflirmative.  'j'he  Protestant 
 nobility,  ^^entry,  buri;esses,  and  others,  presented  a 
 j)etition,  craving.  That  the  corruptions  of  the  Po- 
 pi>h  churrh  might  be  condemned  and  abolished,  and 
 the  worship  oi  the  j)rimitive  church  restored  ;  that 
 the  authority  of  the  Pope  should  be  renounced  and 
 prohibited;  and  the  patrimony  of  the  church  ap- 
 plied to  supj)()rt  ministers,  teachers,  and  the  poor. 
 All  these  demands  were  readily  granted,  except  the 
 last ;  the  nobles,  who  had  seized  uj)on  the  ecclesias- 
 tical revenues  for  themselves,  being  very  loth  to  lose 
 their  prey. — The  ministers  were  a[)pointed  to  thaw 
 up  a  confession  of  that  faith,  the  civil  establishment 
 of  Avhich  they  requestiul:  for  hitherto  the  llelormers 
 had  u>ed  the  Conjr.ssiofi  of  (irnrvay  as  their  ecclesias- 
 tical standard.  Heing  exhilnted  to  the  jiarliament 
 on  the  fourth  day  after,  it  was  approved,  without 
 the  least  alteration,  and  without  a  contrary  vote, 
 except  of  Athole,   Sommervil  a?id  lU)rthwick.    v,  ho 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  27 
 
 said,  They  were  resolved  to  believe  as  their  fathers 
 had  done.  The  ten  Popish  clergymen  present,  whose 
 interest  tempted  them  to  oppose  it,  were  perfectly 
 silent,  which  made  the  earl  of  IMarshal  insultingly 
 to  say,  that  certainly  it  contained  the  very  truth  of 
 God. — The  parliament  also  abolished  the  Pope*s 
 jurisdiction  in  this  realm,  rescinded  all  acts  in  fa- 
 vours of  idolatry,  and  appointed,  that  such  as  said 
 or  heard  mass  should  be  imprisoned  for  the  first 
 fault,  banished  for  the  second,  and  hanged  for  the 
 third.  But  whether  this  or  a  subsequent  meeting 
 appointed  the  Protestant  clergy  to  meet  in  a  Gene- 
 ral Assembly,  twice  every  year,  I  know  not.  Sir 
 James  Sandilands,  a  knight  of  Malta,  who  had  be- 
 haved himself  very  neutrally  in  the  late  broils,  was 
 sent  over  to  France  with  the  above  mentioned  acts, 
 to  get  them  ratified  by  Francis  and  Mary  :  but  his 
 message  was  treated  with  the  utmost  contempt. 
 Nevertheless,  the  Reformers  the  less  regretted  the 
 want  of  their  ratification,  as  they  had  so  solemn  a 
 warrant  for  the  holding  of  parliament.  Francis' 
 death  prevented  the  execution  of  Mary's  resent- 
 ment, as  well  as  the  massacre  of  the  Protestants  at 
 Orleans, — for  which  her  Gidsian  uncles  had  got 
 every  thing  prepared.  Both  Papists  and  Protestants 
 immediately  dispatched  their  commissioners  to  in- 
 vite Mary  home  to  her  native  country;  and  the  con- 
 tempt she  suffered  in  France,  after  her  husband's 
 death,  caused  her  gladly  to  accept  the  invitation, 
 and  hasten  her  return. 
 
 Meanwhile,  the  twelve  ministers  above  mention- 
 ed, w ith  thirty-two  ruling  elders  of  note,  met  in 
 their  first  General  Assembly,  December  20,  1^60, 
 and  approved  of  the  disposal  of  the  ministers,  and 
 presented  afo7'?n  and  order  for  the  election  of  super- 
 intendents, ministers,  elders,  and  deacons.  As,  in 
 their  Confession  of  Faith,  they  had  scarcely  touched 
 
28  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY   OF  THB 
 
 upon  church  ^^ovcrnment  and  disciplinr,  and  did  not 
 fully  aij-ree  with  the  Order  of  (^eneva  respecting 
 funeral  sermons  and  set  forms  of  prayer,  they  ap- 
 pointed Messrs.  Knox,  Willock,  Winram,  Spot*- 
 wo  d,  Row,  and  l^one^Ias,  to  draw  up  a  Form  of 
 churr],  s;overnmcnt  and  discipline.  They  finished  it 
 in  a  few  week-^,  and  presented  it  to  the  privy  coun- 
 cil about  the  middle  of  January  15G1,  for  their  ra- 
 tification But  some  of  the  members,  perceiving 
 that  their  behaviour  was  to  be  more  strictly  watch- 
 ed, and  that  it  inferred  a  recovering  of  the  eccle- 
 siastical revenues,  which  they  had  seized,  and  re- 
 quired an  application  of  them  to  pious  uses,  it  could 
 not  obtain  a  judicial  ratification.  But,  instigated 
 by  Knox,  the  Duke  of  Chatelrault,  the  Earls  of 
 Argyle,  Arran,  Glencairn,  Marshal,  Morton,  and 
 Rothes,  and  the  Lords  James  Stewart,  Yester,  Boyd, 
 Ochiltree,  Herreis,  and  Lindsay,  the  masters  of 
 Maxwell  and  Lindsay,  George  Gordon,  bishop  of 
 Galloway,  Alexander  Campbell,  dean  of  Murray, 
 and  oth<'rs,  liarons,  or  burgesses,  subscribed  an 
 extrajudicial  approbation  of  it. 
 
 This  Jirst  book  of  discipline  required  the  abolish- 
 ment of  superstitious  days,  vou  s,  meats,  prayers, 
 and  of  idolatry  and  all  monuments  thereof.  It 
 prescribed  the  manner  of  administering  and  receiv- 
 ing baptism  and  the  Lord's  Supper,  and  other  ordi- 
 nances of  public  worship;  the  form  of  installing 
 ministers,  ruling  elders,  deacons,  superintendents, 
 and  readers  of  the  Scripture,  in  the  church,  and 
 their  work  ;  the  form  of  censuring  scandalous  per- 
 ikuns ;  the  order  of  the  weekly  meetings  of  minis- 
 ters for  the  joint  exercise  of  their  preaching  gifts; 
 the  form  of  i  elebrating  marriages  and  managing 
 buriaU;  aiul  rules  for  towns,  parishes,  universities, 
 churdi  revenues,  and  re|)arations  of  kirks.  Our 
 Reformers   considered    their  superintendents   as   » 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  29 
 
 mere  temporary  expedient  for  promoting  the  wel- 
 fare of  their  infant  church,  widely  different  from 
 diocesan  bishops.  They  were  to  be  elected  by  all 
 the  kirks  within  the  bounds  of  their  visitation, — 
 to  be  examined,  and  admitted  by  the  ministers  and 
 neighbouring  superintendents.  They  were  obliged 
 to  preach  thrice  every  week,  and  as  much  oftener 
 as  possible,  and  to  visit  the  several  congregations 
 in  their  bounds  thrice  a-year,  and  put  every  thing 
 to  rights.  They  had  no  sole  power  of  excommu- 
 nication or  ordination  allowed  them ;  but  were 
 themselves  subjected  to  the  censures  of  the  mini- 
 sters of  their  province  or  synod,  and  especially  to 
 those  of  the  General  Assembly,  to  which  they  were 
 bound,  twice  every  year,  to  give  an  account  of  their 
 conduct.  In  the  book  of  discipline^  ten  or  twelve 
 of  them  were  proposed :  but,  I  suppose,  through 
 want  of  necessary  salaries  to  bear  their  expences, 
 their  number  never  exceeded  five.  Public  readers 
 of  the  Scriptures  were  necessary  in  that  infant 
 state  of  the  church,  in  which  not  one  of  an  hundred 
 was  capable  of  reading  them.  Their  work  was  to 
 read  some  chapters  of  the  English  Bible  to  the 
 people,  especially  when,  as  was  often  the  case,  they 
 had  none  to  preach  to  them. 
 
 Notwithstanding  the  convention  of  estates  had 
 no  inclination  to  ratify  the  hook  of  discipline,  they 
 appointed  the  Popish  cloisters  and  monasteries  to 
 be  demolished ;  in  consequence  of  which,  many 
 costly  buildings,  much  ecclesiastical  furniture,  and 
 even  many  valuable  registers  and  libraries,  were 
 destroyed.  But  the  Popish  bishops,  abbots,  and 
 priors,  being  allowed  to  retain  much  of  their  wont- 
 ed revenues,  they  disposed  of  what  had  been  reck- 
 oned the  property  of  the  church  as  civil  property, 
 to  their  bastards  or  otherwise.  After  the  news  of 
 king  Francis'  death,  the  Popish  clergy  and  mob  of 
 
30  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 lAlinhnrjnh  made  some  attempts  aq^ainst  the  pro- 
 testant  religion,  (o  which  the  care  and  (  ourai^e  oi 
 the  lieformers  ^^ave  a  timely  cheek,  so  as,  for  some 
 months,  scarcely  any  durst  cele!)rate  mass,  or  ma- 
 nifest themselves  Papists  hy  their  manner  of  wur- 
 sliip.  I^it  no  sooner  had  (Jueen  Mary  returned, 
 in  August  l.5(jl,  than  she  restored  the  mass  in  her 
 own  ahhey  chapel.  IIi;;hly  offended,  many  of  the 
 Pr(»testants  declared,  that  they  could  not  be  un- 
 concerned spectators  of  such  gross  corruption  oi 
 the  worship  of  God,  nor  would  suffer  the  land 
 a^ain  to  he  defiled  therewith  in  their  presence.  To 
 deter  them,  JMary  issued  forth  a  proclamation  for 
 protecting  her  domestics  in  their  idolatrous  devo- 
 tion. The  Karl  of  Arran  protested,  That  notwith- 
 standing this  proclamation,  it  should  he  held  as 
 lawful  to  punish  her  servants  for  saying  or  j)artak- 
 ing  of  mass  or  other  idolatrous  practices,  as  if  they 
 were  murderers.  Knox,  in  his  sermons,  and  other- 
 wise, holdly  declaimed  against  the  Protestant  cour- 
 tiers, who,  contrary  to  their  solemn  oath,  sufl'ered 
 the  idolatry  of  the  mass  to  be  committed;  and 
 added,  that  one  tolerated  mass  was  more  terrible 
 to  him  than  ten  thousand  armed  forces  invading 
 the  kingdom,  as  it  would  provoke  (fod  to  give  them 
 up  to  ruin.  To  Mary's  face,  he  ])oldly  averred, 
 I'hat  the  mass  was  an  idolatrous  worship;  and  that 
 Papists  betook  themselves  to  fire  and  sword,  be- 
 cause they  could  not  support  their  cause  by  Scrip- 
 ture or  ri'ason.  He  viudicated  his  own  conduct, 
 and  maintained,  that  if  ])iinces  furiously  oppress 
 and  murder  their  subjects,  they  may  be  restrained 
 and  imprisoned.  Not  long  after,  the  town  council 
 of  Kdinhiirgh  enacted.  That  no  obstinate  I'apist, 
 mass. priest,  drunkard,  fornicator,  or  adulterer, 
 should  be  received  into  their  city.  In  revenge 
 .hereof,  Mary  imprisoned  the  provost,  declared  the 
 
CHURCPI  OF  SCOTLAND.  31 
 
 city  free  to  all  her  subjects,  appointed  the  council 
 to  elect  a  new  provost,  and  caused  her  own  mass 
 to  be  more  publicly  and  pompously  celebrated. 
 
 The  second  General  Assembly,  meeting  in  De- 
 cember, Lethington,  one  of  Mary's  zealous  Protes- 
 tant supporters,  gave  them  some  trouble  relative 
 to  the  lawfulness  of  their  convention  without  her 
 allowance,  and  in  opposing  their  supplication  of  her 
 to  procure  them  a  civil  ratification  of  their  hook  of 
 discipline.  The  Assembly  sustained  theanselves 
 impowefed  by  Jesus  Christ,  as  head  of  his  church  ; 
 nor,  for  twenty  years  after,  had  any  commissioner 
 from  the  sovereign  any  place  in  their  meetings.. 
 Jn  February  1562,  the  privy  council,  by  an  act, 
 assigned  two  parties  of  the  remaining  revenues  of 
 the  church  to  the  Popish  clergy,  and  the  other  third 
 to  the  Popish  Queen,  out  of  which  she  was  to  pay 
 stipends  to  the  Protestant  ministers,  some  of  whom 
 had  100,  others  200,  and  some  SOO  merks,  assigned 
 them;  which  were  of  the  same  value  as  ten  or 
 twelve  times  as  much  at  present.  Knox  observed 
 that  it  boded  ill  to  the  church,  when  the  devil  had 
 the  two  first  parts  of  her  revenues  firmly  secured 
 to  him,  and  God  had  but  a  poor  chance  for  the  last 
 third. 
 
 In  their  General  Assemljly,  which  met  in  June 
 1562,  the  Reformers  agreed  upon  an  uniformity  in 
 the  administration  of  the  sacraments,  according  to 
 the  Genevan  hook  of  comnion  order;  and  that  the 
 life,  doctrine,  diligence,  and  faithfulness  of  the 
 superintendents,  should  be  tried  in  every  assembly. 
 They  earnestly  petitioned  her  majesty  to  remove 
 the  idolatrous  mass  out  of  her  family  and  kingdom, 
 and  take  care.  That  adulterers,  fornicators,  blas- 
 phemers, and  open  contemners  of  God,  and  his  Sab- 
 baths and  sacraments,  should  be  condign ly  punish- 
 ed ;   that  ministers  and  poor   should  be   proper!  v 
 
32  A   COMPENDIOUS   HlSroitV   O!     THK 
 
 provided  for,  and  kirks  duly  repaired.  Messrs. 
 Knox  and  Hay  were  appointed  as  oecasional  super- 
 intendents to  visit  the  counties  of  Galloway,  Kyle, 
 Carrick,  and  Cunnintrhani.  In  his  travels,  Rnox 
 so  eilectually  re{)resentcd  the  dani^er  of  the  Pro- 
 testant relii^ion  from  the  then  prevalence  of  the 
 Popish  courtiers  and  their  friends,  that  a  great  part 
 of  the  barons  and  gentry  in  the  three  last  mention- 
 ed places,  entered  into  a  Jifth  solemn  engagement  to 
 promote  the  true  Protestant  religion,  support  their 
 ministers,  and  j)rotect  each  othei  ;  which  was  sub- 
 scribed by  the  Earl  of  Glencairn,  the  Lords  Boyd, 
 Cathcart,  Ochiltree,  and  about  170  or  180  others. 
 At  the  next  (xcneral  Assend)ly,  in  December,  Win- 
 ram,  superintendant  of  Fife,  was  accused  of  slack- 
 ness in  his  visitations;  and  of  being  addicted  to 
 worldly  business,  negligent  of  preaching,  rash  in 
 liis  excommunications,  and  rigid  in  his  exaction  of 
 tithes.  Erskine  of  Angus  was  accused  of  admit- 
 ting men  to  be  ministers,  and  exhorters,  or  proba- 
 tioners, without  any  due  trial ;  and  Popish  priests, 
 and  other  wicked  or  ignorant  persons  to  be  readers; 
 and  scandalous  persons  to  be  ruling  elders ;  and  of 
 conniving  at  ministers  not  residing  at  their  charges, 
 and  not  duly  attending  the  weekly  exercises  of 
 jirophesying  or  mutual  imj)rovement.  Methven  of 
 Jedburgh  was  accused,  deposed,  and  excommuni- 
 ratcd  lor  uncleanness  with  his  servant  maid.  No 
 doubt,  these  blcMuishes  in  three  of  the  twelve  re- 
 forming ministers,  did,  in  the  awful  providence  of 
 Ciod,  much  hurt  their  cause. 
 
 In  June,  1563,  the  Assembly  finding  that  the 
 superintendents  had  not  been  duly  laborious  and 
 faithful,  or  had  too  much  work  on  their  hands,  ap- 
 pointed Rnox  and  some  others,  whom  they  ac- 
 counted most  Uarned  and  faithful,  to  visit  particu- 
 lar districts,   plant  churches,    promote  the  licstiuc- 
 
 4 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  33 
 
 tion  of  idolatrous  monuments,  suspend,  depose,  and 
 transplant  ministers,  as  the  superintendents  did, 
 and  with  the  sa^ne  assistance  from  con^re<4ations, 
 synods,  meeting^s  for  exercise,  or  learned  men. 
 Such  as  found  themselves  injured  by  their  minis- 
 ters, elders,  or  deacons,  were  allowed  to  appeal  to 
 the  superintendents  and  their  synod,  and  from  these 
 to  the  General  Assembly,  which,  for  about  twenty- 
 two  years,  met  once  in  six  months  They  also 
 appointed  the  Earl  of  Marshal,  Lord  Ruthven,  Le- 
 thington,  and  the  celebrated  George  Buchanan,  to 
 revise  their  hook  of  discipline,  in  order  to  procure 
 a  parliamentary  ratification  of  it.  But  they  do  not 
 appear  to  have  fulfilled  their  task.  Lord  James 
 Stewart  having  been  advanced  to  be  Earl  of  Mur- 
 ray,  became  much  more  negligent  of  the  establish- 
 ment of  religion,  and  of  punishing  mass -priests, 
 which  occasioned  a  difference  between  him  and 
 Knox.  In  a  set  dispute  with  the  time-serving 
 Lethington,  Knox  and  Row  boldly  maintained. 
 That  it  was  lawful  for  subjects  to  resist  tyrannical 
 princes,  and  to  refuse  her  majesty  the  use  of  her 
 idolatrous  mass.  Knox  was  prosecuted  before  the 
 privy  council  for  writing  some  letters  calculated  to 
 convene  his  Protestant  brethren  for  consultation, 
 when  he  apprehended  their  religion  and  liberties 
 were  in  danger;  but,  notwithstanding  all  the  ef- 
 forts of  Mary  and  her  courtiers  to  ruin  him,  he  was 
 acquitted. 
 
 A  narrative  of  Mary's  refusal  to  ratify  the  treaty 
 of  1560,  with  her  cousin  Elizabeth  of  England; 
 of  Huntley's  influence  at  court,  and  hindering 
 Mary's  conference  with  Elizabeth,  for  fear  of  here- 
 tical infection ;  his  intrigues  to  ruin  or  murder  the 
 Earl  of  Murray,  and  the  remarkable  defeat  of  him 
 and  his  rebellious  associates  in  the  battle  of  Cor- 
 richy,  1.562:   or  of  the  Duke  of  Lenox's  return 
 
 VOL.  I  F 
 
Si  A  COMPRXDIOUS    HISTOIIV   01    THE 
 
 from  Ent^lniul ;  and  the  amours  and  marriap:e  of 
 Henry,  liis  son,  with  the  (iucen,  notwitlistanding 
 all  that  Murray  and  his  friends  could  do  to  the 
 contrary  ;  of  Mary's  flattering-  the  Protestant  lords, 
 in  order  to  obtain  their  consent  to  her  marria^^e 
 witli  Henry,  and  consequent  contempt  of  them,  and 
 refusing-  to  e^'rant  them  security  for  their  religion  ; 
 lier  advancement  of  Kizzio,  the  Italian  musician, 
 and  shameful  intimacy  with  him;  and  the  nojjles' 
 slauo^hter  of  him  l)y  her  husl^and's  direction,  when 
 she  intended  to  make  him  chancellor,  in  order  to 
 attaint  the  Earl  of  Murray  and  his  party,  who  liad 
 fled  into  England ;  and  of  Mary  and  Bothwel's 
 iiuirder  of  Henry,  in  order  to  their  marriage;  and 
 the  prosecution  of  Mr.  Craig,  for  publicly  intimat- 
 ing his  detestation  of  that  marriage,  when  he  was 
 recpiired  to  publish  the  banns  of  it ;  of  the  nobles' 
 prosecution  of  Botlnvel,  till  he  fled  the  country; 
 and  deposition  of  Mary  from  her  royal  power,  as  a 
 subverter  of  their  religion  and  liberties;  and  impri- 
 sonment of  her  in  the  castle  of  Lochleven ;  and  of  her 
 escape  from  thence  and  flight  into  England  ;  and 
 of  the  nobles'  production  of  the  proofs  of  her  whore- 
 dom with  Hothwel,  and  being  his  accomplice  in  the 
 murder  of  Henry  her  husband;  and  of  her  plots 
 against  Elizabeth  during  her  twenty  vears  impri- 
 sonment in  England  ;  and  her  violent  death  by  tlie 
 base  and  villanous  influence  of  Elizabeth  ; — or  of 
 the  civil  war  carried  on  for  seven  years  with  ter- 
 rible barbarity,  between  her  partizans  and  those  of 
 James  her  son,  who  was  crowned,  an  infant,  in 
 J. 0^)7,  would  scarcely  answer  our  purpose. 
 
 Mary's  intentions  to  extirpate  the  Protestant  re- 
 ligion, daily  became  more  and  more  evident.  In 
 I.^f^.O,  Hamilton,  bastard  brother  of  the  Earl  of 
 Arran,  was  n  stored  to  Ins  dignity  and  revenues  of 
 Archbishop  ol  St.  Andrew's.    Ucr  pretended  kind- 
 
 I 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  S5 
 
 ness  and  flatteries  gained  many  of  the  Protestant 
 chiefs  to  her  interest.  The  Earl  of  IMurray  and 
 some  others  were  highly  offended  with  Knox  and 
 his  faithful  brethren,  for  their  pulpit  declamations 
 against  her  Popish  idolatry.  In  order  to  obtain 
 their  consent  to  her  marriage  with  Henry,  her  Po- 
 pish cousin,  she  fawned  upon  the  Protestants,  and 
 seemed  almost  ready  to  concur  with  their  articles 
 for  the  abolishment  of  Popery,  and  for  provision  to 
 their  ministers,  schools,  and  colleges ;  and  for  the 
 punishment  of  horrible  crimes.  But  she  had  no 
 sooner  gained  her  own  purpose,  than  she  peremp- 
 torily told  them,  That  she  would  never  part  with 
 her  mass ;  and  absolutely  refused  to  concur  with 
 any  laws  against  Popery  or  profaneness,  or  to  al- 
 low the  ecclesiastical  revenues  with  which  her 
 council  had  intrusted  her,  to  go  for  the  support  of 
 their  clergy.  The  destruction  of  Rizzio,  her  Italian 
 darling,  in  her  arms,  by  Ruthven,  Morton,  and 
 others,  who  abhorred  his  advancement,  provoked 
 her  to  pretend  great  kindness  to  Murray,  her  bas- 
 tard brother  and  his  companions,  who  had  just  re- 
 turned from  their  exile  in  England,  in  order  that 
 she  might  bend  all  her  fury  against  the  destroyers 
 of  her  paramour. — Nevertheless,  she  absolutely  re- 
 fused to  have  James,  her  child,  for  whom  the  Pro- 
 testants were  so  liberal  of  their  thanksgivings  to 
 God,  baptized  in  their  scriptural  form. 
 
 Meanwhile,  the  General  Assembly  had  enacted, 
 Tiiat  no  superintendents  should  depose  any  mini- 
 ster, exhorter,  or  reader,  without  the  advice  of  the 
 nearest  discreet  ministers,  and  no  longer  than  till 
 the  following  Assembly,  which  might  restore,  or 
 further  censure  the  offenders,  as  they  thought  pro- 
 per ;  and  that  they  should  excommunicate  no  de- 
 linquents, in  places  where  there  v/ere  no  reformed 
 congregations,  without  the  advice  of  such  as  were 
 
3C  A   COMPKNDIOUS    HISTORY  01'  THH 
 
 nearest.  They  appointed  Messrs.  Knox  and  ( Tall- 
 in draw  up  liulc.s  for  the  rifj;ht  ohscrvat'u)n  oj  pu'  ic 
 fasts.  Tliey  presented  to  the  privy  council,  a  so- 
 lemn Rernonst ranee  ai^ainst  the  restoration  of  the 
 Pt)|)ish  arehl)ishnp  of  St.  Andrcw*s  to  his  ancient 
 and  now  enlarged  jurisdiction.  They  wrote  a  let- 
 ter to  the  Englisli  bishops,  in  favours  of  their  Puri- 
 tan brethren,  that  were  persecuted  for  their  non- 
 compliance witli  the  surplice,  cornered  cap,  and 
 other  remains  of  Popish  superstition  ;  and  also  ap- 
 proved the  latest  Helvetian  (^onfessioji  of  Faith, 
 except  as  to  the  observation  of  holy  days. 
 
 In  consequence  of  a  precedini;  agreement,  many 
 noblemen  and  barons  met  in  the  Assembly  15(i7, 
 between  the  deposition  of  Mary  and  the  coronation 
 of  .lames  her  son  ;  and  agreed.  That  the  acts  of 
 1.360,  lor  establishing  of  the  Protestant  religion, 
 and  giving  the  ministers  a  third  part  of  the  ancient 
 benefices,  ought  to  be  duly  executed  ;  and  that,  in 
 the  ensuing  j)arliament,  they  should  exert  them- 
 selves to  their  utmost  to  have  the  Protestant  reli- 
 gion established  upon  a  sure  footing,  and  to  have 
 every  future  king  bound,  by  his  coronation  oath,  to 
 maintain  and  practise  it,  as  a  condition  of  his  sub- 
 jects' allegiance  to  him  ; — and  to  have  the  mass 
 and  (jther  relics  of  idolatry  abolished,  and  th'^  Pro- 
 testant religion  introduced  into  every  part  of  the 
 realm  ;  and  to  have  the  horrid  crimes  of  adultery, 
 whoredom,  blasphemy,  and  the  like,  duly  pu- 
 nished. 
 
 Alter  the  parliament,  which  met  that  year,  had 
 confirmed  the  election  of  the  Karl  of  Murray  to  be 
 Kr;;i  nt  (or  .lames  his  infant  nephew  and  king,  they 
 ratified  the  Coniession  ot  Faith  compiled  in  ].5()(>, 
 and  declared,  That  all  who  should  oppose  it,  or  re- 
 fuse to  receive  the  sacraments  in  the  l^rotestant 
 manner,    should    be    hekl   as   no   members   of   thi^ 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  37 
 
 church.  They  enacted,  That  all  kin^^s,  princes, 
 and  magistrates,  at  their  instalment,  should  swear 
 to  maintain  the  true  Protestant  religion  now  esta- 
 blished, and  abolish  every  thing  contrary  to  it, — 
 and  root  out  all  heretics  and  enemies  to  the  true 
 worship  of  God,  when  duly  convicted :  They  ap- 
 pointed the  thirds  of  ecclesiastical  benefices  to  be 
 paid  to  the  reformed  ministers,  till  the  church 
 should  obtain  full  possession  of  the  tithes  as  her 
 proper  patrimony ;  and  that,  though  patrons  may 
 appeal  from  superintendents  and  provincial  synods, 
 the  General  Assembly  shall  have  the  final  decision 
 relative  to  all  presentations,  from  which  none  may 
 appeal.  They  ordained,  that  no  ecclesiastical  juris- 
 diction be  acknowledged  within  this  realm,  but 
 what  is  established  in,  and  proceeds  from  this  re- 
 formed kirk,  concerning  the  preaching  of  God's 
 word,  administration  of  sacraments,  and  correction 
 of  manners  :  They  appointed  Messrs.  Knox,  Craig, 
 Erskine,  and  Spotswood,  to  mark  out  what  pro- 
 perly belonged  to  ecclesiastical  jurisdiction,  and  re- 
 port to  next  meeting  of  parliament. 
 
 Next  year,  the  General  Assembly  appointed 
 Messrs.  Craig,  Row,  Pont,  Christison,  Lindsay,  and 
 Willock,  to  revise  the  Order  of  excommunicaiion, 
 drawn  up  by  Knox,  and  report  their  judgment.  It 
 was  agreed  to,  and  printed  before  their  Psalm  book, 
 and  plainly  shews.  That  they  reckoned  their  su- 
 perintendents as  merely  occasional  officers,  that  had 
 no  sole  power  of  any  kind.  They  also  appointed 
 an  order  of  electing  commissioners  to  their  Gene- 
 ral Assemblies,  bearing.  That  superintendents  and 
 commissioners  for  visitation  of  kirks  should  all  have 
 power  of  voting  in  them ;  that  ministers  and  com- 
 missioners of  shires  should  be  chosen  by  synods ; 
 that  commissioners  from  burghs  should  be  chosen 
 by  the  council  and  kirk-session  of  the  place ;  and 
 
38  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 that  ministers  should  !)e  chosen  hy  turns.  After 
 tiie  erection  of  Presbyteries,  ministers  were  elected 
 hy  them. 
 
 'J'he  nnirder  of  the  Re<^ent,  Earl  of  IMurray,  by 
 Hamilton  of  I>(Uh\vel  llaui;h,  occasioned  no  small 
 contention  about  the  ehoice  of  his  successor.  And 
 the  Karls  of  Lennox  and  Mar  filled  his  place  but 
 a!)out  two  years  between  them.  Durin^^  tiie  re- 
 gency of  INIurray  and  Lennox,  relij^ion  prospered, 
 ecclesiastical  courts  enjoyed  full  freedom  in  plant- 
 ing" of  churches  and  censurin^^  of  offenders,  and 
 other  i)arts  of  their  work.  In  I.O70,  the  General 
 Assembly  established  regulations  of  their  meetings, 
 that :  1st,  After  a  sermon  by  the  Moderator  of  the 
 last  Assembly,  a  new  INIoderator  should  l)e  chosen, 
 ^d,  The  conduct  of  superintendents  and  commis- 
 sioners for  visitation  of  kirks  should  be  tried,  dd. 
 Penitents  and  scandalous  persons  shall  have  their 
 cases  considered.  1th,  Matters  referred  by  the 
 j)receding  Assembly,  or  Lords  of  Session,  shall  be 
 considered.  .0th,  I'he  conduct  and  accounts  of  ec- 
 clesiastical collectors  shall  be  examined,  (ith,  Pe- 
 titions from  superintendents,  and  appeals  from  sy- 
 nods, shall  be  heard.  7th,  (Juestions  projiosed  on 
 the  first  or  second  days  of  the  meeting,  shall  be 
 considered.  8th,  and  lastly,  Bills  and  complaints 
 shall  be  judged.  The  Assembly  also  enactetl,  Tliat 
 every  candidate  for  the  ministry  should,  at  his  ad- 
 mission, solemnly  engage  never  to  desert  his  office 
 under  pain  of  infamy  and  perjury. 
 
 In  L'j71,  the  Assend)ly  ordained,  That  all  adul- 
 terers, murderers,  incestuous  persons,  and  other 
 more  heinous  offenders,  should  be  prosecuted  be- 
 fore the  provincial  synods,  which  met  twice  every 
 year  ;  and  that  all  (juestions  should  be  first  pro- 
 posed to  synods,  and  only  such  as  were  too  hard 
 for  them  should  be   laid  before  every  Assembly. 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  39 
 
 Messrs.  Knox,  Erskine,  Winram,  Pont,  and  Row, 
 having  drawn  up  articles  concerning  the  'proper 
 object  of  ecclesiastical  jurisdiction,  bearing,  That  it 
 belonged  to  the  church  to  judge  of  true  and  false 
 religion,  doctrine,  heresy,  and  every  thing  annexed 
 to  the  preaching  of  the  word,  and  administration 
 of  sacraments  ; — to  elect,  examine,  admit,  suspend, 
 or  depose  all  such  as  have  charge  of  souls,  or  enjoy 
 ecclesiastical  benefices  ; — to  admonish,  rebuke,  and 
 excommunicate  the  scandalous,  and  receive  to  re- 
 pentance, and  absolve  the  penitents ; — to  judge  of 
 ecclesiastical  pleas  between  church  officers,  and  of 
 causes  relative  to  marriage  and  divorce.  They 
 approved  these  articles,  and  presented  them  to  the 
 parliament  for  their  ratification,  along  with  a  peti- 
 tion. That  ecclesiastical  benefices  should  only  be 
 conferred  on  such  as  the  church  should  find  quali- 
 fied for  the  charge.  But  the  Earl  of  Morton,  who 
 now  managed  that  court,  and  some  other  Lords, 
 abused  the  commissioners  from  the  Assembly  with 
 insolent  language.  Morton  even  obliged  John 
 Douglas,  whom  he  had  just  before  presented  to  the 
 arbishopric  of  St.  Andrew's,  in  the  room  of  Hamil- 
 ton, who  had  been  hanged  for  a  traitor, — to  vote 
 in  the  parliament  as  a  bishop,  under  pain  of  trea- 
 son ;  though  the  superintendent  had  prohibited 
 him  to  vote,  under  pain  of  excommunication. 
 
 In  preferring  Douglas  to  the  archbishopric,  Mor- 
 ton had  secured  most  of  the  revenues  for  himself, 
 and  left  Douglas  little  more  than  a  high  sounding 
 character,  and  a  chance  of  some  Antichristiaii 
 power.  The  gain  which  Morton  made  by  this  in- 
 famous bargain,  tempted  him  and  Mar  the  Regent, 
 a  great  part  of  whose  estate  consisted  of  church 
 property,  to  enlarge  their  incomes  in  the  same 
 scandalous  manner,  by  preferring  to  bishoprics 
 such  pitiful  wretches   as    could  be  content  with 
 
40  A  compi:ndious  history  of  the 
 
 episcopal  titles  and  shaiiows  of  power,  and  allow 
 their  promoters  the  most  of  the  revenues  claimed 
 by  their  sees.  These  the  people  called  tulchan 
 bishops,  in  allusion  to  calves'  skins,  stuffed  with 
 straw,  and  placed  before  cows,  to  make  them  f^ive 
 their  milk. — An  occasional  nicetin«;  of  ministers 
 and  others,  that  used  to  be  members  of  the  Gene- 
 ral Assembly,  pretended  to  have  the  power  of  it, 
 and  marked  their  stron«^  inclination  to  comply  with 
 that  of  the  two  infamous  Earls.  Pont  was  allowed 
 to  be  a  I.ord  of  Session,  providing  that  he  conti- 
 nued his  ministerial  work  Encouraged  by  their 
 compliances,  3Iar  and  his  |)rivy  council  appointed 
 jMorton  the  chancellor,  Ruthven  the  treasurer, 
 Adam  nominal  bishop  of  Orkney,  and  Robert  com- 
 mendator  of  Dunfermline,  secretary,  and  four  others, 
 to  meet  with  their  superintendents  or  their  com- 
 misioners,  and  along  with  them  to  conclude  a  Form 
 of  chunk  policy^  and  method  of  supporting  ministers 
 and  the  royal  dignity, — which  might  be  binding  till 
 his  iNIajesty  should  be  of  full  age,  or  at  least  till 
 the  Estates  of  Parliament  should  abolish  it. 
 
 This  convention  was  quickly  hold  at  l^eith.  But 
 it  doth  not  appear  that  any  ministers  but  Erskine, 
 Winram,  Hay,  Lindsay,  Pont,  and  Craig,  were  pre- 
 sent. They  agreed,  That  the  titles  of  archbishops, 
 bishops,  deans,  and  the  forms  of  dioceses,  should 
 be  retained  as  before  the  Reformation;  that  a  chap- 
 ter of  learned  mifiisters  should  be  annexed  to  every 
 episcopal  see;  that  in  case  of  a  vacancy  the  dean 
 or  president  of  this  chapter  should  exercise  the 
 episcopal  [)ower;  that  bishojis  should  have  no  more 
 power  than  the  superintendents,  till  it  should  be  a- 
 greed  on  ;  that  they  should  be  subject  to  the  (ge- 
 neral Assembly  in  every  spiritual  affair  ;  that  they 
 should  admit  none  to  the  ministry  without  the  ad- 
 vice of  six  of  their  chapter: — they  agreed  on  the 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  41 
 
 manner  of  the  creation  of  such  as  should  be  pre- 
 sented by  the  king*  to  bishopricks ;   and  that  every 
 one  admitted  to  ecclesiastical  functions  or  livin«»-s, 
 should  swear  an   adherence   to  the   Confession  of 
 Faith,  and  an   allegiance  to  his  majesty.      They 
 also  made  some  rules  concerning*  abbots,  priors,  or 
 commendators,  "i  hat  they  should  be  men  of  learn- 
 ing*, and  might  be  Lords  of  Session  or  members  of 
 Parliament,   representing   the   church.     They  fur- 
 ther agreed,   That  no    minister   should    leave  his 
 charge    forty   days  in   the  year,    without   express 
 licence  from  the  king   or  his  bishop;  that  Readers 
 might   administer  baptism,   or  celebrate  marriage, 
 if  it  had  been  duly  intimated.     They  also  enacted 
 some  regulations  of  ecclesiastical  benefices,  and  of 
 the  orders  and  offices  in   colleges.     The  most   of 
 their  agreements  marked  an  Antichristian  and  car- 
 nal mind.     Morton  took  care  that  nothing  shcmld 
 be  secured  to  the  clergy,  but  their  tithes,  which  he 
 knew  not  how  to  take  from  them,  unless  in  dona- 
 tive pensions  to  noblemen's  servants,  or  by  causing 
 them  to  dispone   them   in   fee  to   their  masters. 
 Mar,   being  episcopally  inclined,   highly  approved 
 the  above  regulations.    To  the  great  grief  of  Knox 
 and  others,  John  Douglas,  who  was  remarkable  for 
 nothing  but  compliance  with  the  covetous  humour 
 of  Morton,    was  solemnly  admitted  archbishop  of 
 St.  Andrew's.     Knox   not  only  refused   to  conse- 
 crate him,  but  also  publicly  denounced  a  curse  up. 
 on  the  giver  and  the   receiver  of  that  office.     In- 
 formed  of   these    proceedings,    Beza   of  Geneva, 
 begged  of  Knox  and  his  brethren,  to  beware  of  re- 
 introducing the  plague  of  prelacy,  which  they  had 
 thrust    out    in  their  Reformation.       Nevertheless, 
 James    Boyd    was   made   archbishop    of  Glasgow, 
 John   Faton,  bishop  of  Dunkeld,  and  A.  Graham, 
 ^f  Dumblane.      Soon  after,   we   find    G.  Douglas 
 
 G 
 
i2  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THK 
 
 bishop  of  Murray,  and  some  olhcis, — of  Caitliness, 
 Brecllin,  Isles,  (iailoway,  SsC. 
 
 In  tlu'  end  of  this  yi'ar,  l.'>71,  died  John  Knox, 
 our  princij)al  Reformer,  in  a  truly  humble  and 
 Christian  manner.  His  zeal  for,  and  trust  in  his 
 (^od,  made  him  fearless  of  every  thing  but  sin. 
 INIorton,  who  hated  him,  after  his  death  attested, 
 that  he  never  feared  the  face  of  man.  The  ma- 
 jesty of  his  master  Christ,  appearing  in  him,  made 
 his  enemies  stand  in  awe  of  him.  (^ueen  Mary, 
 notwithstanding  all  her  levity  and  wickedness, 
 owned  that  she  was  more  atraid  of  his  prayers  than 
 often  thousand  armed  men.  He  foretold  a  multi- 
 tude of  unhkely  events,  wnich  were  exactly  fulfill- 
 ed, particularly.  That  the  thick  walls  of  the  castle 
 of  St.  Andrew's  should  prove  as  egg  shells  in  de- 
 fence of  the  conspirators  against  Cardinal  Beaton; 
 that  the  English  would  not  deliver  them,  but  they 
 would  fall  into  the  hand  of  their  enemies,  and  be 
 carried  into  a  foreign  country;  that  notwithstand- 
 ing manifold  repulses,  God  would  perfect  the  refor- 
 mation of  religion  in  Scotland ;  that  Queen  ]Mary 
 would  be  compelled  to  hear  the  word  of  God  ;  that 
 since  Henry  her  husband  had  burned  the  Psalm 
 book  to  please  her,  God  should  strike  them  both 
 head  and  tail ;  and  since  he  went  to  mass  to  j)lease 
 her,  God  should  make  her  the  instrument  of  his 
 destruction;  that  tht  castle  of  Edinburgh  should 
 spue  Sir  A\'illiam  Kirkaidy  over  its  walls,  and  he 
 should  be  hanged  for  his  obstinate  adherence  to 
 the  wicked  (Jueen  ;  and  that  its  St.  David's  tower 
 should  run  down  liki'  a  sand  glass;  that,  if  3Iorton 
 did  not  study  to  promotf  the  welfare  of  the  church 
 and  nation,  his  regency  should  have  an  ignominious 
 end  ;  that  Th(jmas  lAlaitland  should  die  misc'rably 
 among  strangers,  and  Lethington  unhappily  at 
 home,  as  the  punishment  of  their  treacherous  op- 
 position to  the  cause  of  Christ. 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  -^3 
 
 Alarmed  by  the  articles  of  the  convention  at 
 Leith,  the  faithful  ministers,  notwithstanding  all 
 the  power  and  influence  of  Morton,  now  Regent, 
 set  themselves  to  o[)pose  them.  The  General  As- 
 sembly, 1573,  declared  it  impossible  for  any  man 
 faithfully  to  fulfil  the  work  of  a  minister,  and  of  a 
 civil  judge ;  and  prohibited  every  minister,  after 
 Pont,  to  accept  of  a  place  in  the  Court  of  Session. 
 The  complaints  against  Pont  for  his  neglect  of  vi- 
 siting the  county  of  Murray,  as  he  had  been  ap- 
 pointed, justified  their  conduct.  They  likewise 
 appointed  every  meeting  of  the  clergy  for  exercise 
 of  their  gifts  to  have  a  copy  of  the  acts  of  the 
 assembly ;  and  that  every  province  should  have 
 copies  of  the  orders  given  to  superintendents,  that 
 they  might  observe  whether  they  did  faithfully 
 execute  them  or  not.  After  the  General  Assem- 
 blies had,  for  eight  years,  laboured  in  limiting  the 
 power  of  the  new  bishops,  and  in  censuring  them 
 for  exceeding  their  bounds,  and  for  their  admission 
 of  ignorant  and  scandalous  persons  into  ecclesiasti- 
 cal  offices,  and  for  their  personal  negligence  and 
 immoralities,  they,  notwithstanding  much  opposi- 
 tion from  Morton,  and  even  from  the  young  king, 
 put  them  down  altogether,  as  dregs  of  Popery. 
 And,  with  much  deliberation,  formed  the  second 
 hook  of  discipline,  and  declared.  That  the  office  of 
 Readers,  Exhorters,  and  Visitors  of  the  church, 
 being  but  temporary,  should  now  cease.  Some  of 
 the  corruptions  complained  of,  in  the  eleventh 
 chapter  of  that  book,  were  soon  after  abolishedc 
 
A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY,  &C.  ^ 
 
 CHAPTER   III. 
 
 Jk'mg  James  VI.  introduces  the  National  Covenant;  and 
 Presbyteries  Jbrmed — He  once  and  again  labours  to  esta- 
 blish Prelacy  and  his  own  Erastian  Supremacy — No- 
 ticmal  Covenant  renewed. — Presbyterian  Church  Govern^ 
 vient  established — Assembly  Covenant  with  God,  and 
 earnestly  promote  Refornmtion. 
 
 ni^HE  French  zealots  and  Spaniards  had  formed  a 
 sacred  league  to  extirpate  the  Protestant  religion, 
 and  their  Popish  brethren  in  Britain  were  disposed 
 to  join  them ;  dispensations  had  l)een  sent  them 
 from  Rome,  allowing  them  to  enter  into  any  en- 
 jT^agement,  by  oath  or  otherwise,  in  favour  of  the 
 Protestant  religion,  providing  they  continued  firm 
 adherents  t^  the  Pope  and  his  religion  in  their 
 heart.  King  James,  now  about  fourteen  years  of 
 age,  under  one  of  his  religious  fits,  or  prompted  by 
 some  church-men,  or  by  his  favourites,  Stewart  of 
 Aubigne,  his  father's  cousin,  now  made  Earl  of 
 Lennox,  and  Stewart  of  Ochiltree,  now  made  Earl 
 of  Arran,  who,  about  this  time,  for  difi'erent  ends, 
 professed  great  zeal  for  the  Protestant  religion, — 
 required  John  Craig,  his  minister^  to  form  a  cove- 
 >:ant  or  oath,  so  expressly  pointed  against  Popery, 
 that  no  Papist,  whose  conscience  was  not  utterly 
 
4«  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY   OK    THK 
 
 debauclicd,  ini<;ht  Ix^  capable  to  swear  it.  Crai^ 
 <lre\v  up  wliat  hath  since  !)een  ordinarilj  called  the 
 national  covenant^  which  was  subscribed  by  James 
 and  his  privy  council,  the  Karls  of  Ar<,^yle,  Lennox, 
 Bothwel,  Uuthven,  and  the  Lords  O^ilvy,  Cath- 
 cart,  James  Stewart,  c^c  in  the  beginning-  of  1581 
 James  also  ajipeared  extremely  zealous  for  esta- 
 blishing order  in  the  church,  and  making  provision 
 for  lier  clergy.  He  proposed,  that  the  nine  hun- 
 dred and  twenty-four  parishes  in  the  kingdom 
 should  be  reduced  to  six  hundred,  and  these  classed 
 into  .//////  presbyteries;  and  that  of  these  six  hun- 
 dred ministers,  one  hundred  should  have  five  hun- 
 dred mcrks;  two  hundred  of  them,  three  hundred 
 merks  ;  other  two  hundred  of  them,  but  two  hun- 
 dred merks  ;  and  the  other  one  hundred  about  one 
 hundred  merks  Scots,  for  their  yearly  stipend  ;  the 
 least  of  which  being  then  an  ecjuivalent  of  eighty 
 bolls  of  oat  meal,  these  salaries  were  not  so  despi- 
 cable as  we  are  apt  to  imagine,  had  they  not  been 
 miserably  [)aid 
 
 (jlad  to  find  the  court  in  such  a  temper,  the  As- 
 scnd)ly  quickly  fornu  d  these  presbyteries,  and  sup- 
 plicated his  majesty  and  coun<il,  that  there  mi;^ht 
 lie  a  Judge  appointed  at  Edinburgh,  to  judge  of 
 wrongs  done  to  ministers,  and  an  act  of  Parliament 
 declarin<j;  the  j)articular  grounds  of  the  deposition 
 of  clergymen;  and  that  vacant  benefices  should  be 
 bestowed  upon  su(  h  as  minister  in  the  church,  not 
 upon  laymen,  'i'hey  cited  the  Poj)ish  abbots,  com- 
 m(  ndators,  priors,  priores>es,  and  bishops,  who  still 
 enjoyed  the  ecclesiastical  revenues,  and  were  basely 
 dilapidating  them  to  compear  betore  next  As- 
 seml.ly  to  answer  for  tiieir  conduct.  Upon  his  ma- 
 j(  sty's  denianiHng  how  the  third  estate  of  Parlia- 
 ment was  to  be  now  supj)lied,  when  bishops  were 
 out  down,  they  agreed,   That    conmiiijbioiiers  frou^ 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  47 
 
 the  Assembly  should  fill  their  place.  But  I  do  not 
 find  that  they  intended  that  these  commissioners 
 should  be  clergymen.  They  also  appointed  the 
 Covenant,  which  had  been  lately  subscribed  by 
 James  and  his  council,  to  be  subscribed  by  all  ranks 
 in  the  kingdom,  and  that  such  should  be  censured 
 who  refused  to  do  so.  They  prohibited  all  private 
 celebration  of  baptism  or  marriage,  under  pain  of 
 deposition  to  ministers. 
 
 No  sooner  had  Lennox,  lately  converted  from 
 Popery,  got  rid  of  Morton  his  rival,  than  he  laid 
 aside  his  religious  appearances,  and  presented  Mont- 
 gomery, minister  of  Stirling,  to  the  archbishoprick 
 of  Glasgow,  in  the  room  of  Boyd,  and  got  him  ad- 
 mitted by  force ;  but  secured  for  himself  a  great 
 part  of  the  episcopal  revenues.  He  and  Adamson 
 of  St.  Andrew's,  by  their  scandalous  behaviour,  and 
 by  their  fraudulent  and  violent  opposition  to  re- 
 forming measures,  gave  their  brethren  no  small 
 trouble  in  their  assemblies.  Montgomery  was  ex- 
 communicated ;  but  Lennox  supported  him.  Bal- 
 canquel,  A.  Melvin,  Dury,  and  no  doubt  other 
 faithful  ministers,  thundered  forth  their  declama- 
 tions against  the  court's  encroachments  upon  the 
 spiritual  power  of  the  church.  Balcanquel  and 
 Melvil  were  prosecuted,  and  Dury  was  banished  on 
 that  account. 
 
 In  consequence  of  their  trouble  with  Montgo- 
 mery, the  Assembly  1582,  under  pain  of  excommu- 
 nication, prohibited  all  indirect  methods  of  enter- 
 ing into  ecclesiastical  offices ;  all  asking  of  presen- 
 tations from  magistrates  or  patrons  ;  and  all  at- 
 tempts to  free  themselves  from  the  jurisdiction  and 
 discipline  of  the  church  by  appeals  to.  great  men, 
 or  courting  Uieir  favour.  They  declared  all  de- 
 privation from  ecclesiastical  offices,  as  well  as  exa- 
 mination and  admission  to  them,  to  belong  to  the 
 
48  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTOUY  OK  THF 
 
 governors  of  tlic?  church  ;  and  that  dcpiivatiun  is 
 from  njjice,  as  will  as  from  the  salary.  J'hey  de- 
 chircd  herosy,  l\)|)ery,  common  swearing-,  blas[)he- 
 my,  perjury,  adultery,  incest,  fornication,  man- 
 slaut^^hter,  theft,  common  opj)resiion,  common 
 drunkenness,  takinp^  of  immoderate  usury,  non-resi- 
 dence at  their  charges,  unnecessary  absence  from 
 them,  or  nee^hct  of  the  duties  thereof  for  forty  days 
 in  a  year,  >\  ithout  very  relevant  grounds,  or  their 
 holding  ol'  more  benefices  than  one  at  the  same 
 time,  or  their  dilapidation  of  the  church-rents,  or 
 their  simony,  to  be  sufficient  grounds  of  deposing 
 ministers.  They  remonstrated  to  King  James, 
 That,  l>y  the  advice  of  his  counsellors,  he  had,  to 
 the  dishonour  of  Christ,  assumed  a  spiritual  head- 
 ship over  the  church,  somewhat  similar  to  that  of 
 the  Pope  ;  that  ecclesiastical  benefices  were  be- 
 stowed upon  men  that  were  violently  intruded  into 
 the  ministerial  office  ;  that  Presbyteries,  Synods, 
 and  General  Assemblies  were,  by  letters  of  horning, 
 hindered  from  censuring  the  scandalous  ;  that  while 
 Dury  was  suspended  and  banished  for  his  faithful- 
 ness, Montgcmiery,  though  scandalous  arid  excom- 
 municated, was  entertained  and  recpiired  to  preach  ; 
 that  the  privy  council  had,  by  an  act,  pretended  to 
 annul  his  excumnuinication  ;  that  such  as  abused, 
 hurt,  or  murdered  ministers  or  others,  concerned 
 in  the  prosecution  of  Montgomery,  and  other  scan- 
 dalous persons,  were  not  punished,  but  favoured  ; 
 that,  contrary  to  his  promise,  Lennox  had  never 
 reformed  his  family  from  Poj)ery  or  Papists  ;  and 
 that  thr  laws,  which  had  been  made  for  the  main- 
 tenance of  the  true  religion,  and  for  punishment  of 
 its  open  enemies,  were  not  executed  ; — and  insisted 
 for  the  redress  of  these  grievances.  Lennox  and 
 Arran  thought  to  intimitlate  and  prosecute  the 
 presenters  of  this  remonstrance.      But   when   they 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  49 
 
 saw  how  boldly  A.  Melvin  subscribed  it  before  their 
 face,  they  dismissed  them  in  safety,  suspecting  that 
 they  were  supported  by  some  secret  influence. 
 
 While  James,  and  Lennox,  and  Arran  his  direc- 
 tors, continued  oppressing  the  church,  the  nominal 
 bishops,  fearless  of  censure,  abandoned  themselves 
 to  their  wonted  enormities.  But  the  nobles  having 
 rescued  James  out  of  their  hands,  and  taken  Arran 
 prisoner,  and  charged  Lennox  to  return  home  to 
 France,  the  General  Assembly  appointed  particular 
 Presbyteries  to  prosecute  the  bishops  of  Murray, 
 Aberdeen,  Brechin,  Dunkeld,  St.  Andrew's,  and 
 Dunblain,  for  neglecting  their  ministerial  work, 
 and  for  their  familiarity  with  excommunicated  per- 
 sons, wasting  of  the  church's  patrimony,  and  other 
 personal  scandals.  They  supplicated  his  majesty 
 and  estates.  That  the  acts  of  Parliament,  relative 
 to  the  liberties  and  jurisdiction  of  the  church,  be 
 so  explained  and  enlarged,  as  that  she  may  have 
 the  sole  power  of  the  admission  or  deprivation  of 
 ministers,  trial  of  their  doctrine,  and  stopping  of, 
 or  loosing  from  censure  ;  that  Presbyteries  of  pas- 
 tors and  ruling  elders  be  legally  authorized,  and  an 
 adequate  punishment  denounced  against  such  as 
 oppose  their  meetings  ;  that  Synodical  and  General 
 Assemblies  be  authorized  to  meet  as  often  as  they 
 find  necessary  for  the  good  of  the  church,  and  have 
 full  power  to  appoint  their  own  time  and  place  of 
 meeting  ;  that  no  league  be  made  with  the  Papists 
 abroad,  and  that  such  as  have,  contrary  to  their 
 oath,  apostatized  to  Popery,  be  punished  with  ban- 
 ishment or  otherwise,  as  traitors  to  God  ;  that  pro- 
 per methods  be  taken  to  recover  the  patrimony  of 
 the  church,  and  provide  for  her  ministers  ;  that  all 
 presentations  be  directed  to  Presbyteries  ;  that  mi- 
 nisters disabled  for  their   work  by  age  or   trouble 
 
 H 
 
.♦O  ^    (()MJ*k:NI)lul  *    nU'TORY   Of   '1  H  K 
 
 f njov  their  salaiii's  for  lite.     'I'hey  also  declared  all 
 baj)tism  of  infants  hy  laics  to  he  void  and  null. 
 
 For  ten  months,  while  the  Lords  had  the  direc- 
 tion of  James,  ministers  had  full  liberty  to  exe- 
 cute their  office  ;  Papists,  excommunicated  and  li- 
 centious persons,  either  left  the  country,  or  assum- 
 ed an  appearance  of  Protestant  relii^inn  and  scjher 
 conversation  :  the  friendship  between  Scotland  and 
 En<>land  revived.  James  himself,  in  a  multitude 
 of  forms,  the  convention  of  estates,  and  the  (gene- 
 ral Assembly,  liad  all  declared  the  nobles,  takin^]^ 
 him  out  of  the  hands  of  Lennox  and  Arran,  his  evil 
 counsellors,  to  be  a  lawful,  honest,  and  good  service 
 to  him  and  the  nation, — for  which  they  should 
 never  be  pursued.  But  James's  new  tutors  being 
 more  intent  to  instruct  him  in  the  methods  of  vir- 
 tue and  lawful  government,  than  to  flatter  his  pride 
 and  other  predominant  lusts,  he  soon  wearied  of 
 them,  and  made  his  escape  from  them  in  June  1.3S3. 
 And,  notwithstanding  all  the  remonstrances  of  the 
 General  Assembly,  Papists  were  as  highly  favoured 
 by  him  as  ever.  Archbishop  Adamson,  a  drunken 
 glutton,  under  pretence  of  drinking  spaw  water, 
 repaired  to  England,  to  contrive  with  the  managers 
 there  the  proper  methods  of  elVectually  introducing 
 Episcopacy  into  Scotland.  Though  scarcely  seven- 
 teen years  of  age,  James  returned  to  his  former 
 work  of  persecuting  such  as  faithfully  testified 
 against  the  proceedings  of  him  and  his  favourites. 
 Dury  was  (!harge(l  to  remove  from  Edinburgh,  an(i 
 remain  at  Montrose.  A.  ]\lelvin  was  cited  before 
 the  privy  council  for  some  spx?eches  he  was  said  to 
 have  uttered  at  a  public  fast.  The  university  of 
 St.  Andrew's  presented  a  solemn  attestation  of  his 
 innocence,  subscribed  by  thirty  of  the  principal  per- 
 sons in  the  college  and  place.      But  James  and  his 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLA^'D.  51 
 
 courtiers  disregarded  every  thing  that  was  in  fa- 
 vours of  such  ministers  as  were  faithful  and  zea- 
 lous ;  it  was  only  pitiful  and  scandalous  wretches 
 that  they  inclined  to  protect.  Melvin  compeared, 
 and  after  protesting  that  it  belonged  to  ecclesiasti- 
 cal courts  to  judge  of  his  doctrine,  he  repeated  and 
 vindicated  his  words.  While  James  and  his  coun- 
 cil raged,  he  laid  down  his  Hebrew  Bible  before 
 them,  and  told  them,  that  there  were  his  instruc- 
 tions for  preaching.  After  admitting  his  enemies 
 to  be  witnesses,  they  could  find  nothing  in  his 
 words  to  make  an  handle  of;  and  therefore  re- 
 solved to  imprison  him  in  the  castle  of  Blackness, 
 on  account  of  his  refusing  them  to  be  proper  judges 
 of  his  doctrine.  But  he  retired  into  England.  AH 
 these  that  had  been  principally  concerned  in  rescuing 
 James  from  his  wicked  directors,  were  charged  to 
 leave  the  country,  and  never  to  return  to  Britain 
 or  Ireland  without  his  express  licence  ;  and  all 
 their  servants  were  prohibited  to  come  within  ten 
 miles  of  his  residence. 
 
 But  few  of  the  ministers  dared  to  meet  in  the 
 Assembly  1584.  Nor  durst  even  these  transact 
 any  business.  Faithful  ministers  were  every  where 
 persecuted.  Spies  were  employed  to  watch  their 
 sermons,  and  inform  the  court  if  they  uttered  any 
 words  on  which  they  might  be  prosecuted.  Patrick 
 Galloway  suffered  no  small  trouble  for  denouncing 
 the  just  judgments  of  God  against  those  that  sub- 
 verted the  Protestant  religion,  and  abused  his  ma- 
 jesty and  his  authority.  Davidson,  Carmichael, 
 Pol  wart,  and  others,  were  obliged  to  flee  into  Eng- 
 land. After  Adamson  had  laboured  to  render  our 
 faithful  ministers  as  odious  as  possible,  and  con- 
 certed how  to  conform  the  Scotch  church  to  the 
 English,  he  returned  home.  A  Parliament  was 
 soon  after  held  in  May,  with  such  secresy  and  dis- 
 
.v2  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTOKY   of     IHK 
 
 patch  that  it  was  almost  ended  he  fu re  it  was  heard 
 of.  Adani.soii  and  Montgomery  represented  the 
 Estate  of  bishops  in  it.  A  lord  of  the  articles  hav- 
 ing informed  some  ministers  of  Edinhurgh  of  it, 
 they,  in  vain,  attempted  to  get  access  to  it.  'J'his 
 Parliament  enacted,  That  his  majesty  had  the  su- 
 preme authority  in  all  causes  ccclvsiu.stlcid  as  well 
 as  civil  ;  that  all  refusing  to  acknowledge  the  privy 
 council  as  judges  in  any  matter,  or  pretending  tiiat 
 things  merely  ecclesiastical  did  not  belong  to  the 
 civil  jurisdiction,  or  attempting  to  diminish  the 
 power  and  privileges  of  bisho])s,  that  were  the  third 
 estate  in  l^irliament,  should  be  held  and  punished 
 as  high  treason;  that  all  holding  of  assemblies, 
 ecclesiastical  or  civil,  without  his  majesty's  special 
 permission  or  appointment,  or  the  uttering  of  any 
 false  or  reproachful  speecjies  against  him  or  his  an- 
 cestors or  ministers,  from  pulpits  or  otherwise, 
 should  be  capitally  punished.  When  these  acts 
 were  proclaimed,  i^alcanquel  and  Pont  protested 
 against  them.  James,  having  ordered  the  magis- 
 trates of  Edinburgh  to  imprison  all  such  as  dared, 
 from  the  pulpit,  to  utter  one  word  against  these 
 acts,  l^alcanquel  and  Lawson  fled  into  Englanil, 
 and  remitted  a  faithful  warning  to  their  peojile  ;  to 
 which  James  obliged  the  town  council  to  return  a 
 most  abusive  answer.  I'he  ministers  replied  in  a 
 discreet  vindication  of  themselves.  Another  l*ar- 
 liament  that  year  enacted,  That  every  minister, 
 reader,  and  niaster  of  a  college,  should,  within  forty 
 days  subscribe  the  above  acts  of  Parliament,  and 
 solemidy  engage  to  observe  them,  and  to  submit 
 themselves  to  bishops  as  their  ordinaries,  uniier 
 pain  ol'  losing  their  sti])cnds.  Craig,  and  too  many 
 others  complied  ;  but  most  of  the  more  faithful 
 ministers  fled  into  England. 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  6S 
 
 In  1585,  Elizabeth  having  taken  ofFence  at  the 
 slaughter  of  some  of  her  subjects  by  the  Scotch  bor- 
 derers, the  fugitive  Lords  returned;  and  a  pestilence 
 prevailing  in  Edinburgh  and  places  about,  they  got 
 James  into  their  management,  and  reduced  Arran 
 to  his  original  meanness.  But  they  manifested  more 
 zeal  for  the  recovery  of  their  own  civil  property, 
 power  and  dignity,  than  for  the  redress  of  ecclesi- 
 astical grievances.  When  the  Parliament  met  at 
 Linlithgow,  the  commissioners  from  the  church  pre- 
 sented to  his  Majesty  a  remonstrance  against  the 
 Erastian  acts  of  the  preceding  year,  to  which  he  gave 
 asoftjbut  not  very  important  reply.  They  were  thank- 
 ful that  it  was  not  worse,  and  insisted  that  he  would 
 confer  with  some  of  their  most  judicious  and  godly 
 ministers  concerning  the  discipline  of  the  church,  in 
 order  to  have  it  distinctly  established  by  the  Parlia- 
 ment. Not  long  after,  a  conference  was  held  be- 
 tween some  of  the  privy  cousellors  and  some  cler- 
 gymen, who  from  their  allowance  of  power  to  bi- 
 shops and  their  chapters,  appear  to  have  been  none 
 of  the  strictest. 
 
 In  1586,  the  Synod  ofFife  excommunicated  Arch- 
 bishop Adamson,  for  his  wicked  intrusion  of  himself 
 into  that  antichristian  office,  and  his  vi^icked  and 
 contemptuous  behaviour  in  it :  But  he  'appealed 
 from  them  to  his  Majesty,  Estates  of  Parliament,  and 
 Privy  Council;  and  drawing  up  a  form  of  excommu- 
 nication against  James  and  Andrew  Melvin,  and 
 others  of  the  more  faithful  members  of  the  Synod, 
 he  caused  his  boy,  attended  by  one  or  two  of  his  jack- 
 men,  to  read  it  in  the  church  ;  and  notwithstanding 
 his  own  excommunication,  and  a  preceding  suspen- 
 sion, he  would  preach. — In  consequence  of  his  sham 
 submission,  corroborated  by  James's  solicitation,  the 
 next  Assembly  took  off,  or  rather  declared  null,  his 
 Synodical  excommunication;  against  which  Andrew 
 
$^  A    CUMPKNDIOUS   HISTORY   01     Tiff-: 
 
 Mclvin  and  Thomas  Buclianan  enteroti  their  solemn 
 protest.  From  the  dechirations  of  the  Synods  of 
 Merse,  Teviotdale,  and  Tweedale,  it  appears,  that 
 the  ministers  were  far  enoni^h  from  unanimity  of  sen- 
 timent eoneernin^  the  suhs(  ription  of  the  I'>a5tian 
 acts  of  1581<.  But  it  is  still  more  plain,  that,  to  se- 
 cure rest  for  Arehl)ish()p  Adamson,  the  privy eouncil 
 appointed  A.  Melvin,  j)rofessor  of  divinity  at  St.  An- 
 drew's, to  traverse  the  counties  of  An^us,  Perth,  and 
 ISIearns,  for  confutin<^  and  converting;  the  trafficking 
 Jesuits;  and  Adamson  to  supply  ids  place,  by  teach- 
 ing two  lessons  of  divinity  every  week.  But  as  this 
 change  was  like  to  have  ruined  the  college  by  the  de- 
 parture of  all  the  foreign  and  other  students  of  divi- 
 nity, king  James,  at  the  university's  request,  per- 
 mitted A.  Melvin  to  return  to  his  work.  But  his 
 persecution  of  Gibson  and  C'owpcr,  manifests,  that 
 James  still  hated  all  those  that  dared  to  testify  against 
 his  conduct  from  the  pulpit.  He  at  once  banished 
 all  the  ministers  of  Edinburgh,  because  they  would 
 not  pray  for  his  mother's  life,  before  they  had  pro- 
 per eviilence  of  the  injustice  of  her  condemnation. 
 Hesupported  Montgomery  and  Adamson,  whose  con- 
 duct was  base,  and  their  consciences  always  at  his 
 nod.  Pont  was  presented  to  the  bishoprick  of  Caith- 
 ness ;  but  it  seems,  he  refused  to  accept  of  it. 
 Lesly,  a  staunch  Papist,  who  had  so  zealously  sup- 
 ported Mary  in  England,  was  restored  to  his  bi- 
 shoprick of  Ross. 
 
 In  conse(pience  of  a  remonstrance  from  the  mini- 
 sters, the  Parliament,  1.387,  enacted,  ^J'hat  Jesuits 
 and  trafficking  priests,  hearers  of  masis  and  apostates 
 to  Popery,  should  be  duly  prosecuted  and  punished. 
 The  preceding  laws  relative  to  the  l^rotestant  reli- 
 gion were  renewed  and  confirmed,  by  a  general  act. 
 And,  from  reganl  to  the  king's  purse,  the  episcopal 
 revenues  were  annexed  to  the  crown;   which  was  a 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  55 
 
 stab  to  the  heart  of  the  prelatical  interest.  In  1588, 
 James  and  his  Estates  made  another  act  against  Je- 
 suits, trafficking'  priests,  hearers  of  mass,  and  re- 
 volters  to  Popery.  They  also  entered  into  a  new 
 bond  or  covenant  to  maintain  the  Protestant  religion, 
 and  defend  his  Majesty's  person  and  authority  against 
 the  holy  leaguers  or  others,  and  to  bring  Papists  and 
 excommunicated  persons  to  condign  punishment; 
 and,  for  the  more  harmonious  promotion  of  these 
 ends,  to  submit  all  differences  among  themselves 
 to  the  arbitration  of  some  friends.  About  the  same 
 time,  the  General  Assembly  prohibited  Archbishop 
 Adamson  to  marry  the  Popish  earl  of  Huntley  ;  and 
 also  observed  two  fasts,  the  one  upon  Thursday,  and 
 the  other  on  the  Lord's  day; — and  agreed,  that  there- 
 after, the  first  day  of  every  General  Assembly  should 
 be  employed  m  fasting  and  humiliation.  Another  so- 
 lemn fast  was  observed  about  the  end  of  October, 
 on  three  several  Sabbaths — with  which  they  con- 
 nected the  administration  of  the  Lord's  supper. 
 
 Notwithstanding  the  remarkable  defeat  of  the 
 pontifically  blessed  Spanish  Armada  in  \5SS,  the 
 earls  of  Huntley,.Errol,  Crawfurd,  and  others,  main- 
 tained a  correspondence  with  Philip  of  Spain,  and 
 with  the  Duke  of  Parma,  in  order  to  promote  a 
 Spanish  invasion.  The  discovery  of  their  treachery 
 procured  pompous,  but  scarce  ever  executed,  laws 
 against  the  Papists.  Upon  a  supplication  from  the 
 Assembly,  the  Bond  for  religion  was  again  ra- 
 tified in  the  council.  Orders  were  issued  for  about 
 ninety  six  ministers,  in  the  different  parts  of  the  na- 
 tion, to  convene  the  godly  and  well  affected  of  all 
 ranks,  and  administer  to  them  the  national  covenant, 
 and  take  their  subscriptions  to  it,  and  to  the  late 
 bond  for  maintenance  of  religion  and  his  Majesty's 
 authority.  To  prevent  tumults  by  Papists,  about 
 130  of  the  nobility  and  gentry  were  appointed  to 
 
5(i  A   COMPENDIOL'S   HIi)TORY   OF   THF 
 
 attend  and  support  them,  in  this  work.  The  zeal 
 of  the  Presbyterian  elerii^y  for  James'  safety,  mani- 
 fested in  this  nnd  other  matters  of  that  critieal  junc- 
 ture, and  their  kcepin;^  of  liis  kin^^dom  in  such  or- 
 der, while  he  took  his  romantic  voyage  to  brin^ 
 liome  his  new  queen  from  Denmark,  so  ingratiated 
 them,  that,  takini;  one  of  liis  rebgious  fits,  he  pre- 
 sented liimself  in  their  (General  Assembly,  and  ex- 
 tolled their  constitution,  as  highly  preferable  to  that 
 of  any  other  church  u[)on  earth.  Archbishop  Adam- 
 son's  dying  recantation — his  profession  of  his  sin  in 
 marrying  Huntley  in  opposition  to  the  authority  of 
 the  church,  and  in  opposing  his  Presbytery,  and 
 slanderously  defending  the  Erastian  acts  of  the  Par- 
 liament 1384 — and  of  his  sorrow  for  the  same,  and 
 his  earnest  solicitation  to  be  absolved  from  the  ex- 
 communication pronounced  against  him  by  the  Sy- 
 nod of  Fife,  also  encouraged  the  faithful  part  of  the 
 clergy. 
 
 For  the  confirmation  of  their  Presbyterian  go- 
 vernment, the  Assembly  had  reijiiired  all  ministers 
 and  intrants  to  subscribe  their  second  Book  ofdkci- 
 pline,  James,  who  had  rendered  himself  odious  to 
 many  of  his  subjects,  by  his  continued  favour  to  the 
 l^Jpish  lords,  and  !)y  neglecting  to  avenge  the  mur- 
 der of  the  late  Fail  of  ^lurray,  upon  Huntley,  one  of 
 them,  was  become  fond  of  their  favour.  At  their 
 recjuest,  and  perhaps  by  means  of  iNIaitland  his  chan- 
 cellor, who  neciled  to  wipe  otf  suspicions  of  his  hav- 
 ing a  iiand  in  that  murder,  he  held  a  conference  with 
 some  of  the  principal  of  them — in  consequence  of 
 which  an  act  was  made  by  the  Parliament,  June, 
 1 .092,  rat  I  filing  Preshijterian  government^  and  appoint- 
 in  f(  the  rcLtnlar  viectnifj;  of  Assemblies,  and  assigning 
 to  Si/ nods,  Prest)ijtirics,  and  Sessions,  their  respective 
 work :  and  annulling  all  former  acts  in  the  time  of 
 Poj)ery,  contrary   hereto,    and   declaring,   that   the 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  5^ 
 
 acts  of  1584,  should  not  hinder  the  church  to  exer- 
 cise her  own  intrinsic  power  in  judging  ecclesiasti- 
 cal causes — and  annulling  the  act  which  granted 
 commissions  to  bishops,  and  appointing  all  presen- 
 tations to  ecclesiastical  charges  to  be  directed  to 
 Presbyteries- — and  appointing  them  to  accept  of  can- 
 didates presented  by  his  iMajesty  or  other  patrons, 
 if  duly  qualified.  This  Parliament  further  enacted, 
 That  if  patrons  did  not  timeously  present  a  quali- 
 fied candidate,  the  right  of  presentation  should  de- 
 volve on  the  Presbytery. — And  they  prohibited  all 
 markets  on  the  Lord's  day,  or  erection  of  church 
 lands  or  tithes  into  tem;5oral  lordships. 
 
 Notwithstanding  this  favourable  act,  it  appears, 
 from  the  reasons  of  their  fast  on  two  Sabbaths  of 
 December,  that  a  considerable  part  of  the  nation 
 continued  perishing  in  ignorance  for  want  of  teach- 
 ers ;  that  many  of  all  ranks,  especially  of  the  nobi- 
 lity, were  inclined  to  Popery  and  Atheism  ;  that 
 Jesuits,  and  other  Popish  Priests,  swarmed  without 
 control ;  that  blasphemy  of  God's  name,  contempt 
 of  his  word,  and  of  civil  magistrates — treason,  mur- 
 der, adulter}^  witchcraft,  and  other  like  abomina- 
 tions, mightily  prevailed.  The  Assembly  appointed 
 Messrs.  John  Davidson,  Robert  Bruce,  Walter  Bal- 
 canquel,  David  Lindsay,  and  four  others,  as  a  stand- 
 ing committee,  to  espy  the  dangers  of  the  church  ; 
 and  appointed  brethren  in  the  different  parts  of  the 
 nation  to  give  them  j)roper  information  concerning 
 Papists  and  immoralities. 
 
 By  letters  intercepted  in  the  end  of  this  year,  it 
 was  found,  that  the  earls  of  Huntley,  Errol,  and  An- 
 gus, and  others  of  inferior  rank,  had  continued  their 
 treasonable  correspondence  with  Philip  of  Spain,  and 
 that  it  was  intended,  that  S0,000  Spaniards  should 
 invade  the  kingdom,  either  at  Kirkcudbright  in  Gal- 
 loway, or  at  the  mouth  of  the  Clyde,  westward  of 
 
o6  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTOllY   OF   THE 
 
 (ilas^ow.  IltTt'iipoii,  .lames  cinittcd  a  proclamation 
 against  the  guilty,  and  called  Ids  sidjjects  to  make  a 
 resolute  stand  (or  the  defence  of  their  country  ;  and 
 lie,  and  a  considerable  nund)er  of  his  nobles,  barons, 
 and  oljieis,  entered  into  a  solemn  association  or  co- 
 venant, to  exert  thepiseives  to  their  utmost  in  de- 
 fence of  the  Protestant  religion,  and  in  punishini^ 
 the  traitors.  lUit,  notwitstanding'  all  this  parade, 
 James  took  care  to  protect  his  Papal  friends,  who 
 sought  his  life,  and  the  l^lrliament  1.093,  as  good 
 as  absolved  them,  under  pretence  that  no  proper 
 proof  could  be  had  against  them.  Tliis  render- 
 ed them  and  their  brethren  more  and  more  insolent. 
 The  vSynod  of  Fife  made  this  a  ground  of  fasting; 
 and,  to  James'  great  vexation,  delivered  up  unto 
 Satan,  Huntley,  Eirol,  Angus,  and  Home,  and  their 
 principal  assistants,  as  apostates  to  Popery  ;  and 
 Huntley  and  the  laird  of  Auchindou  n,  as  also  mur- 
 derers of  the  earl  of  Murray.  Tiie  (Tcneral  Assem- 
 bly, not  only  formed  1-8  |)articular  Presbyteries,  ap- 
 pointed rules  for  the  visitation  of  them,  and  prohi- 
 bited ministers  to  publish  any  slander  against  his 
 Majesty,  but  also  insisted  with  him  to  bring  the  ex- 
 ( omnmnicaied  lords  to  their  trial.  Chancellor 
 JNIaitland  got  that  matter  relerred  to  the  conven- 
 tion of  Estates,  in  which,  upon  a  sham  submission, 
 sent  u[)  in  writ,  these  traitors  were  absolved  from 
 all  past  treasons,  providing  they  be  good  subjects 
 and  Protestants  for  the  future,  and  pay  a  certain 
 fine.  This  absurd  indulgence  of  the  obstinate  ene- 
 niies  of  the  religion  and  liberties  of  the  nation,  high- 
 ly provoked  the  zealous  Protestants,  especially  wiien 
 they  ob>erved  them,  regardless  o(  the  terms  of  their 
 absolution,  proceeding  in  their  wonted  courses. 
 'i'he  Assembly  ].0J)1<  confirmed  the  sentence  of  ex- 
 conununication  inflicted  by  the  Synod  of"  Fife,  and 
 insisted  with  James  for  their  condign  punishment; 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  59 
 
 and  that  proper  methods  should  be  taken  to  stop 
 the  increase  of  Popery.  He  returned  them  soft 
 words,  which,  it  is  probable,  he  never  intended  to 
 reg-ard.  Lord  Home  got  himself  reconciled  to  the 
 church.  The  rest,  to  whom  Bothwel,  who  had  for 
 a  time  terribly  disturbed  the  nation  with  his  vio- 
 lences, joined  himself,  were  declared  outlaws,  and 
 their  estates  forfeited.  In  1595,  we  find  little  more 
 than  the  Assembly's  appointment  of  commissioners 
 to  visit  colleges,  plant  vacant  churches,  and  try  per- 
 sons that  enjoyed  ecclesiastical  benefices. 
 
 Chancellor  Maitland,  perhaps  chiefly  to  support 
 himself  in  opposition  to  Bothwel,  had  for  some  time 
 past  favoured  the  church.  After  his  death,  the  ma- 
 nagement of  matters  chiefly  depended  on  the  eight 
 commissioners  for  the  now  super-expended  royal  re- 
 venues—some of  which  were  reckoned  concealed 
 Papists.  In  the  beginning  of  1596  James  emitted 
 a  proclamation,  requiring  all  his  subjects  to  with- 
 stand the  Spaniards  and  all  their  agents ;  but  he 
 took  care  not  to  mention  the  Popish  lords  as  any  of 
 them.  Nay,  while,  in  his  beggared  condition,  he  was 
 soliciting  the  General  Assembly  for  a  public  con- 
 tribution in  all  their  congregations  to  assist  him 
 against  the  Spaniards,  he  allowed  the  wives  and 
 friends  of  the  outlawed  Papists  to  enjoy  the  whole 
 of  their  revenues. 
 
 The  General  Assembly,  consisting  of  about  400 
 ministers,  having  met  in  March,  applied  themselves 
 to  search  out  the  causes  of  the  Lord's  controversy 
 with  the  nation,  and  to  appoint  measures  for  the 
 better  preservation  of  their  religion  and  liberties. 
 They  began  with  an  inquiry  into  the  sins  of  the  mi- 
 nistry ;  and,  for  remedies  of  the  corruptions  which 
 they  found  among  them,  they  appointed,  That  ail 
 candidates,  at  their  admission,  should  be  carefully 
 tried  concerning  their  knowledge,  prudence,  and 
 
60  A  COMl'lNlilOUS    HISTORY   OF   THP 
 
 Spiritual  experience ;  that  they  should  be  solemnly 
 int(  rrof^ated,  what  had  moved  them  to  accept  of  the 
 charge;  that  ?i<)in'  \\\u)  in^yicd  themselves,  oi  soli- 
 cited admission  to  a  place  or  char«;e,  slwxild  he  adm'd- 
 fcd,  nor  any  of  the  Presbytery,  who  had  solicited  for 
 one,  be  allowed  to  act  in  his  ele(  tion  or  admission  ; 
 that  none  should  ask  a  presentation,  without  advice 
 of  the  Presbytery,  in  whose  bounds  the  charge  lay; 
 that  such  ministers  as  shoidd  not  be  i^ivcn  to  prayer 
 and  diligent  study,  j)articularly  of  the  Scri])tures — 
 or,  who  should  not  study  to  be  spiritual  and  power- 
 ful in  their  ministrations,  and  to  apply  their  doc- 
 trine in  opposition  to  the  prevalent  corruptions  of 
 the  place  and  time  ;  or,  who  should  preach  in  a  dry, 
 scholastic,  and  obscure  manner;  or  who  should  be 
 careless  about  promoting  religion,  negligent  in  visit- 
 ing the  sick,  or  in  taking  care  of  the  poor;  or,  who 
 should  connive  at  the  sins  of  their  hearers,  especially 
 persons  of  high  rank  ;  or  should  be  slothful  in  the 
 administration  of  the  sacraments,  or  admit  to  them 
 peisons  ignorant,  profane,  or  scandalous — or  upon 
 little  or  no  trial — should  be  rebukkd  for  the  first 
 offence,  and  be  DKroi;KD,  if  thereafter  they  conti- 
 nue in  their  evil  course; — that  all  admitters  of  per- 
 sons to  sacraments  for  money  or  worldly  gain,  be 
 directly  deposed ; — that  every  minister  have  a  ses- 
 sion, composed  of  the  fittest  |)ersons  in  his  congrega- 
 tion, to  assist  him  in  governing  his  charge ; — that 
 their  discipline  strike  not  only  against  whoredom, 
 murder,  and  the  like,  but  against  cursing,  profane 
 swearing,  profanation  of  Sabbath,  disobedience  to 
 j)arents,  idleness,  and  want  of  a  lawful  calling, 
 drunkenness,  want  of  God's  worship  and  good  order 
 in  faniili<'s,  neglect  of  the  religious  education  of  chil- 
 dren, lying,  slander,  backbiting,  and  breach  of  pro- 
 mise— and  that  all  ministers  that  persevere  in  the 
 neglect  hereof  be  detoskd  : — That  none   that  fall 
 
 1 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  61 
 
 into  scandal  be  readmitted  to  fellowship  in  sealing 
 ordinances,  without  proper  evidence  of  repentance  : 
 That  such  ministers  as  dilapidate  benefices,  or  de- 
 mit them  for  favour  or  money,  or  exchange  or  set 
 tacks  of  them,  or  tjiat  transplant  themselves  with- 
 out advice  of  the  church,  be  censured:  That  all  mi- 
 nisters,  that  are  light  or  wanton  in  their  behaviour, 
 apparel,  speech,  or  company,  or  that  sport  them- 
 selves with  dancing,  cards,  or  dice ;  or  that  keep 
 inns,  take  immoderate  interest  for  money,  bear 
 worldly  offices  in  families  of  great  men,  deal  in  mer- 
 chandise, forestalling  of  corn,  or  other  worldly  oc- 
 cupations, tending  to  discredit  their  office,  or  divert 
 them  from  their  work — or  that  are  liars,  revilers, 
 backbiters,  flatterers,  breakers  of  promise,  braw- 
 lers, or  quarrelers — be  dk posed,  if  they  do  not  re- 
 form, when  duly  admonished:  That  no  minister  wait 
 upon  the  court,  or  commence  a  law  suit  of  impor- 
 tance, without  the  allowance  of  his  church  :  That 
 such  as,  notwithstanding  admonition,  take  no  care 
 to  cause  their  family  behave  in  a  sober  and  religi- 
 ous manner,  shall  be  judged  unfit  to  govern  the 
 church  of  God  :  That  such  as  do  not  study  to  be 
 every  where  edifying  and  spiritual  in  their  conver- 
 sation, be  rebuked  :  And  that  none  take  part  with 
 scandalous  persons,  who  are  under  process  by  their 
 brethren. — In  order  to  impress  these  matters  more 
 deeply  on  their  consciences,  Mr.  John  Davidson  of 
 Prestonpans,  after  he  had  read  and  briefly  explained 
 the  3d  and  33d  chapters  of  Ezekiel  relative  to  the 
 duty  of  Watchmen,  laid  home  their  sins  to  them, 
 with  such  faithfulness  and  power,  as  issued  in  much 
 deep  contrition  of  heart,  and  solemn  confession  of 
 sin,  renovation  of  their  national  covenant  with  God, 
 andengagementto  walk  more  warily  and  labour  more 
 diligently  in  their  charges.  Not  a  few  of  the  clergy 
 being  absent,  the  Assembly  appointed,  that  there 
 
62  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 shoukl  be  like  limniliation  and  c()V(?nantin^'  with  Cod 
 in  their  synodical  ineetin;;s ;  and  in  Presbyteries, 
 for  the  sake  of  such  as  could  not  attend  at  Synods. 
 The  covenant  w  as  also  renewed  in  many  con^rej^a- 
 tions;  and  where  it  was  not,  the  subse(juent  lielec- 
 tion  quickly  appeared. 
 
 Tlie  As<eiubly  further  represented  to  all  ranks  in 
 tlie  nation  their  aboundin*^'  wickedness — in  the  de- 
 cay of  zeal  for  the  cause  of  God — the  prevailing  i£^- 
 noranre  and  C(>nteinj>t  of  (iod  s  ordinances — the  ne- 
 glect of  his  worshij)  in  families,  or  masters  turning 
 over  the  performance  ol  it  upon  their  cooks,  or  other 
 servants — the  neglect  of  spiritual  converse,  and  pre- 
 valence of  that  which  is  carnal  and  profane — the 
 countenancing  of  idolatry  and  superstition — the  ob- 
 servation of  Popish  festivals,  bonfires,  ])ilirrimages, 
 singing  of  carols  at  Christmas,  \:e — blasphemy  of 
 (iod's  name,  or  cursing  in  common  discourse;  pro- 
 fanation of  the  Sabbath,  by  the  labours  of  seed-time 
 and  harvest,  and  by  journies  and  trysts  about  civil 
 business,  or  by  carnal  sports  and  recreations,  danc- 
 ing, drinking,  or  keeping  of  markets; — neglect  of  re- 
 lative duties,  and  of  the  religious  education  of  chil- 
 dren and  servants — orchildren  commencing  law  suits 
 against  their  parents,  or  giving  themselves  in  mar- 
 riage without  regarding  their  consent; — murders, 
 or  countenancing  of  murderers; — adulteries,  forni- 
 cations, incests,  unlawful  marriages  and  divorces, 
 legitimation  of  adulterous  or  other  bastard  children, 
 drunkenness,  gluttony,  gorgeous  and  vain  apj)arel, 
 fdthy  or  bloody  speeches; — sacrilegious  seizing  of 
 the  church's  j)roperty,  to  the  hindrance  of  the  s})read 
 of  the  gospel;  oppression  of  tenants  \n  ith  rackeci 
 rents,  slavish  services,  or  unseasonable  tithing — 
 oppression  of  the  |)oor  by  usury,  forestalling  of  mar- 
 kets, or  withholding  of  corns  from  sale — strolling 
 about  ol" pipers,  fiddlers,  songsters,  sorners,  sturdy 
 beggars,  or  like  unlawful  callings,  and  all  counte- 
 nancing of  them. 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  63 
 
 They  represented  to  the  courts  of  civil  judica- 
 ture, their  great  wickedness,  in  their  almost  uni- 
 versal neglect  of  doing  justice  between  man  and 
 man ;  their  remissions  or  reprieves  in  cases  of  mur- 
 der, incest,  or  adultery  ;  the  advancement  of  weak 
 and  wicked  men  into  the  office  of  judges ;  the  ne- 
 glect of  punishing  Papists,  particularly  the  Popish 
 Lords,  and  their  adherents,  but  allowing  the  rents 
 of  their  forfeited  estates  to  their  wives  and  friends, 
 who  supported  them ;  the  allowing  of  pretended 
 bishops,  abbots,  or  priors  to  vote  in  parliament,  in 
 name  of  the  church  ;  buying  of  pleas  ;  delaying  or 
 wresting  of  justice  for  the  sake  of  bribes ;  and  suf- 
 fering about  four  hundred  parishes  to  continue 
 without  any  fixed  gospel  ministrations,  for  want  of 
 provision  to  ministers. 
 
 They  no  less  faithfully  represented  to  the  king 
 himself,  the  sins  of  his  family,  that  sometimes  fa- 
 mily worship,  and  even  the  reverend  asking  of  God's 
 blessing  upon  meals,  or  giving  thanks  for  them, 
 were  neglected ;  that  they  made  no  conscience  of 
 attending  the  sermons  on  week  days ;  that  he  and 
 his  favourites  sometimes  conversed  in  time  of  ser- 
 mon ;  that  he  and  his  courtiers  were  guilty  of  pro- 
 fane cursing  and  swearing;  that  murderers.  Pa- 
 pists, and  excommunicated  persons,  were  counte- 
 nanced in  his  family,  or  allowed  to  be  in  his  com- 
 pany ;  that  his  queen  and  her  ladies  were  not  duly 
 delicate  in  their  company,  but  indulged  themselves 
 in  night-wakes,  balls,  and  sinful  absenting  from  the 
 worship  of  God — They  also  represented  to  him 
 some  methods  of  redressing  the  more  public  griev- 
 ances.— And  they  agreed  to  appoint  a  committee 
 to  attend  his  court,  in  order  to  promote  the  plant- 
 ing of  churches,  and  procuring  of  stipends ;  and 
 that,  if  patrons  did  not  present  candidates  before 
 six  months  from  the  death  of  the  former  incumbent, 
 the  Presbytery  should  immediately  present  one. 
 
A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY,  kc.  65' 
 
 CHAPTER   IV. 
 
 King'  James  favours  Papists,  and  hy  captious  questicnS'^ 
 Clcrgymcti\s  Vote  in  Parliament — Constant  Moderators 
 — Packed  General  jissemblics — Introduction  of  D'wcC' 
 sail  Bishops  and  Popish  Ceremonies — And  by  Persecu- 
 tion of'  the  Faithjid  about  txcenty-seven  years,  terribly 
 defaced  the  Church — King  Charles  I.  and  Archbishop 
 Laud,  for  about  thirteen  years  more,  increased  her 
 viiseiy,  by  supporting  Arminianism  and  Prelacy,  and 
 obtruding  more  Superstition, 
 
 In  the  end  of  1569,  the  Popish  Lords,  finding 
 their  foreign  quarters  not  to  their  wish,  resolved  to 
 return  home,  and  make  their  peace  with  their  coun- 
 try, on  the  easiest  terms.  As  it  was  suspected 
 that  James  encouraged,  if  he  did  not  formally  in- 
 vite them  to  return,  the  ministers  took  the  alarm, 
 and  the  Assembly  and  their  commissioners  remon- 
 strated against  their  continuance  in  the  country, 
 as  they  were  notorious  enemies  to  its  religion  and 
 liberties, — and  against  James'  allowing  the  Popish 
 countess  of  Huntley  to  be  present  at  the  baptism 
 of  his  daughter  Elizabeth,  and  his  entrusting  that 
 princess  to  the  care  of  the  Popish  lady  of  Living- 
 ston, who  was  upon  the  point  of  being  excommuni- 
 cated by  the  church.     Andrew  Melvin,  in  his  bold 
 
 K 
 
6G  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 anJ  zealous  nianiur,  faillilully  represented  to  him 
 liis  and  his  couneirs  wiekethiess,  in  labouring  to 
 bear  dow  n  the  faithful  ministers  of  Christ,  and  to 
 assume  authority  in  spiritual  causes,  and  to  protect 
 the  Popish  I.ords.  Janus  gave  them  no  satisfac- 
 tion, but  told  them,  That  he  and  they  would  never 
 agree,  till  the  limits  of  their  respective  jurisdictions 
 should  be  distinctly  fixed;  and  particularly,  till  it 
 should  be  enacted,  that  no  minister  should,  from 
 the  pulpit,  meddle  with  his  and  his  council's  pro- 
 cedure ; — that  no  Cieneral  Assembly  should  meet 
 without  his  special  command,  nor  any  deed  of  it 
 be  of  any  force,  before  it  was  ratified  by  him  or  bis 
 commissioner;  and  that  no  church  judicatory  should 
 meddle  with  any  causes  against  which  the  civil 
 laws  do  strike. 
 
 Not  long  after,  James  summoned  Mr.  David 
 Black  in  St  Andrew's,  to  appear  before  his  privy 
 council,  to  answer  for  some  words,  which  he  was 
 said  to  have  uttered  from  the  pulpit,  against  the 
 behaviour  of  himself,  his  queen  and  council.  Black 
 protested,  that  the  church  was  the  proper  judge  of 
 his  doctrine  at  first  instance,  and  declined  the  au- 
 thority of  the  council,  as  incompetent  to  be  primary 
 judge  in  this  matter.  Solemn  attestations  of  his 
 innocence  of  that  which  was  laid  to  his  charge, 
 from  a  great  number  of  his  most  respectable  hear- 
 ers, in  the  magistracy  and  university,  uere  produced 
 before  the  council ;  but  these  were  altogether  disre- 
 garded,  and  the  deposition  of  his  enemies,  however 
 imalicious,  and  of  others  grossly  ignorant,  were  sus- 
 tained against  him  as  prool  :  and  he  was  banished 
 to  the  north  side  of  Tay.  About  three  or  four 
 hundred  ministers  signed  an  advice  to  Mr.  Black, 
 to  decline  the  council.  None  was  more  active  in 
 procuring  svibx  riptioiis  than  Spoiis^iioodf  afterward 
 Archbishop  oi  Si.  Andrew's,  who,  at  the  same  time. 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  67 
 
 treacherously  informed  James  of  all  their  proced- 
 ure. The  faithful  ministers  earnestly  remonstrated 
 against  his  majesty  and  councirs  judging  and  pu- 
 nishing their  brother,  Mr.  Black.  But  all  was  in 
 vain.     He  was  determined  to  humble  them. 
 
 Highly  offended  with  the  commissioners,  whom 
 the  church  had  appointed  to  watch  against  her 
 dangers,  on  account  of  their  faithful  information 
 of  Presbyteries,  and  for  their  remonstrances  against 
 the  favour  shewn  to  the  Popish  Lords,  or  the  like, 
 James  charged  every  one  of  them  to  depart  from 
 Edinburgh ;  and  then  stretched  every  nerve  to  de- 
 coy those  that  remained  into  his  Erastian  measures. 
 He  promised  his  utmost  efforts  to  procure  better 
 stipends  to  the  clergy,  if  they  would  demonstrate 
 their  loyalty,  by  subscribing  a  Bond,  which  he  had, 
 or  intended  to  form.  Fearing  that  some,  by  their 
 poverty,  might  be  induced  to  comply,  the  banished 
 commissioners  transmitted  a  warning  to  the  several 
 Presbyteries  to  be  on  their  guard.  The  bond, 
 which  James  prepared  for  their  subscription,  con- 
 tained in  it  a  promise  of  allegiance,  and  of  submit- 
 ting their  doctrine  relative  to  things  which  might 
 be  reckoned  to  concern  the  king  and  his  council, 
 to  them  as  proper  judges  of  it,  and  never  to  de- 
 cline their  jurisdiction  as  incompetent.  Against 
 the  subscription  of  this  Bond,  the  ministers  pled. 
 That  it  was  superfluous  to  bind  themselves  to  al- 
 legiance, since  they  had  done  that  sufficiently  in  the 
 national  covenant,  which  had  been  lately  renewed; 
 that  their  doing  it,  in  the  manner  required  in  this 
 bond,  supposed  them  to  have  been  formerly  disloyal; 
 that  this  bond,  proceeding  from  the  church's  ene- 
 mies, was  to  be  suspected  as  a  snare;  that  the  in-* 
 famy  of  those  that  subscribed  a  like  bond,  by  ihe 
 instigation  o^  Archbishop  Adamson  in  1584*,  was  a 
 warning  to  forbear  subscribing  at  present;  that 
 
68  A  COMPKNDIOLS  HI5T0UY  OF   THR 
 
 this  l»ond  restrained  faithful  reproof,  and  means  of 
 repentance,  and  made  the  kint;  head  of  the  church  as 
 well  as  of  the  state,  and  was  contrary  to  the  word 
 of  God,  and  to  the  laws  made  for  the  liberties  of 
 this  (  hurch. 
 
 Uohei  t  Bruce,  and  other  ministers  of  Edinburgh, 
 declined  to  confer  with  James,  till  he  shoidd  recal 
 the  commissioners  of  the  church,  wiiom  he  had  ba- 
 nished from  the  city.  Some  courtiers,  who  hat- 
 ed the  Ku;iiT  managers  of  the  royal  revenues,  by 
 dealin^r  with  both  parties,  laboured  to  kindle  strife 
 between  them  and  the  church.  'J'o  free  himself  of 
 four  hundred  pounds  Scots  of  debt,  one  Robert 
 Stewart  a  macer,  ^ave  up  to  the  king  a  list  of  such 
 burghers  in  Edinburgh,  as  were  most  careful  for 
 the  safety  of  faithful  ministers;  in  consequence  of 
 which,  21'  of  them  were  charged  to  depart  from 
 the  city.  Alarmed  herewith,  ^^lessrs.  Balcanquel 
 and  Bruce  represented  the  dangerous  situation  of 
 the  church  to  such  as  were  well  affected  to  her. 
 They,  after  mutual  consultation,  appointed  the 
 Lords  Lindsay  and  Forbes,  Mr.  Bruce  and  some 
 others,  to  represent  to  his  majesty  his  duty  to  in- 
 terpose his  authority  for  the  prevention  of  impend- 
 ing dangers :  But  he  refused  to  regard  their  re- 
 quest. Some  agents  of  the  court,  by  raising  a  re- 
 port, that  he  had  given  an  unfavourable  answer; 
 and  that  the  inhal)itants  were  in  arms; — and  l)y 
 crying  at  the  doors  of  the  churches,  in  which 
 they  were  assend)Ied,  Save  jfoursclvcs,  and  in  the 
 streets,  To  nrms,  raised  a  considerable  mob, — some 
 of  which  thought  the  king  had  I)een  in  danger, 
 and  others,  that  their  ministtrs  had  been  murder- 
 ed. Notwithstanding  his  sickness,  the  provost  rose, 
 got  out,  and  quelled  the  uproar. 
 
 AflVightrd  for  the  consequences,  James  sent  for 
 their  petition   that   same  night,   and   promised   ta 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  €9 
 
 content  the  ministers  and  their  supporters.  They 
 insisted  that  he  should  remove  from  his  council, 
 Seaton,  Elphinj^ston,  and  Hamilton,  three  of  the 
 OcTAViANs  formerly  mentioned,  whom  they  judged 
 troublers  of  the  church,  and  supporters  of  the  ex- 
 comnmnicated  Popish  lords  ;  and  that  these  lords 
 should  be  banished  the  country  till  they  should 
 offer  proper  satisfaction  to  the  church  and  nation  ; 
 and  that  the  commissioners  of  the  church  should, 
 by  a  royal  proclamation,  be  invited  back  to  Edin- 
 burgh, whence  they  had  been  driven.  But  his 
 fright  being  over,  he  refused  their  agents  access 
 to  present  these  requests  to  him  ;  and  at  last,  pre- 
 tending to  be  provoked  with  the  late  tumults,  he 
 fled  off  to  Linlithgow,  appointed  all  strangers  to 
 depart  from  Edinburgh,  and  prohibited  the  judges 
 to  hold  any  more  courts  in  it.  Messrs.  Bruce, 
 Balcanquel,  Balfour,  and  Watson,  minsters  of  Edin- 
 burgh, and  Cranston  of  ,  were  summoned  to 
 
 appear  before  the  privy  council  at  Linlithgow,  and 
 answer  as  required ;  and  warrants  were  issued  to 
 apprehend  five  of  the  principal  burghers  that  fa- 
 voured their  courses.  Expecting  no  justice,  the 
 ministers  fled,  but  the  burghers  compeared  and 
 were  cast  into  prison.  The  ministers  and  other 
 friends  of  the  church  were  exceedingly  grieved  on 
 account  of  the  tumult,  as  they  perceived  how  it 
 would  be  improved  to  the  reproach  of  the  work  of 
 God  in  their  hands.  On  the  Sabbath  after,  Mr. 
 Bruce  publicly  declared  his  detestation  of  it,  and 
 of  the  neutrality  of  too  many  ministers,  and  of  the 
 countenance  given  to  the  Popish  lords.  After  their 
 flight,  he,  and  Balfour,  and  Watson,  remitted  large 
 vindications  of  themselves  and  brethren  from  all 
 share  in  the  tumult. 
 
 Bent  to  have  the   Scotch   church  conformed  to 
 the  English,,  in  order  that  his  succession  to  Queen 
 
*0  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 Elizabeth  of  Ent^land  mi^lit  be  the  easier,  James 
 had  already  formed  a  list  of  his   intended  bishops  ; 
 but  as  thini^s  were  not  yet  quite  ripe  for  establish- 
 ing them  in  their  sees,  he  published  fifty-five  ques- 
 tions, which  he  re(juired  the   (general   Assembly  to 
 answer,  viz.  Whether   matters  relating  to   the  ex- 
 ternal ^^overnment  of  the  diunh   mi^ht  not  be  dis- 
 puted ?  What  power  the   kin^  and   chT^y  have  in 
 the  makini;  of  ecclesiastical  laws  ?  When  it  is  law- 
 ful  for  ministers   to   leave  their   flocks  ?  Whether 
 ministers  may  a])ply  their  doctrine  to   such   as  are 
 not  of  their  congregation  ?  Whether  ministers  may, 
 from    the    pulpit,   point    out   particular  transgres- 
 sors ?  For  what  enormities  they  may  publicly  blame 
 magistrates  ?    Whether    such    public   declarations 
 from  the  pulpit  against  the  faults  of  particular  per- 
 sons, ought  to  proceed  on   full    certainty,   or   upon 
 mere  report  and  suspicion  ?  Whether  preachers  may 
 wander  from  their  text  in  declaiming  against  vices? 
 Whether  a  minister  may  exercise  jurisdiction  with- 
 out the  consent  of  the  greater  part  of  his  session  ? 
 Whether  the  session  be  judges  of  their   minister's 
 doctrine?  Whether  ruling  elders  may  ever  mode- 
 rate in  sessions  ?  Whether  the  minister  alone  hath 
 power   to   choose  the   members    of  session  ?  Why- 
 ruling  elders  and  deacons  are   nut  chosen  for  life  ? 
 How  many  Presbyteries  ought  to  be  in  a  county  ? 
 And   how    many   pastors   in    each  ?  Whether  only 
 pastors,  or  also  all  ruling  elders  and  deacons  ou^ht 
 to  have  votes  in   Presbyteries?  What   ought   to  be 
 handled  in  Presbyteries,   which    may  not  be  trans- 
 acted in  sessions  ?  What  form  of  process  ought  to 
 be  used   before   sessions   and   Piesbyteries  ?  What 
 ought  to  be  decided  in   Synods,    which   may  not  in 
 Presbyteries?  What   j)ower  of   judgment    have  go- 
 vernors and  professors  of  colleges   in    Presbyteries, 
 Synods,  and  Asscniblies  ?  Whetiier  any  but  the  «u. 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  '71 
 
 preme  magistrate,  when  he  is  Christian  and  pious, 
 hath  lawful  power  to  convene  General  Assemblies  ? 
 Whether  should  the  meetings  of  General  Assem- 
 blies be  ordinary  or  extraordinary  ?  Who  have 
 right  to  vote  in  Assembliess  ?  Whether  all  men  of 
 religion  and  learning  in  the  church,  or  only  all  pas- 
 tors, or  only  commissioners?  How  many  members 
 are  necessary  to  form  a  General  Assembly  ?  How 
 many  of  these  ought  to  be  ministers  ?  And  how 
 many  not  ?  Who  have  the  power  of  choosing  com- 
 missioners to  sit  in  General  Assemblies  ?  Whether 
 an  act  of  the  General  Assembly  be  valid  without 
 the  king's  consent  ?  Whether  two  thirds  of  the 
 votes  be  necessary  to  render  an  act  authoritative  ? 
 Whether  inferior  judicatories  can  judge  persons 
 that  do  not  reside  within  their  bounds?  What  ju- 
 dicatory shall  administer  discipline  to  the  king's 
 household  and  council  ?  Ought  every  person  re- 
 quired to  attend  church  judicatories  to  have  a  for- 
 mal citation  assigning  its  own  grounds  ?  Can  an 
 inferior  court  summon  persons  to  a  superior  one  ? 
 Must  private  admonitions,  with  reasonable  inter- 
 vals, take  place  before  all  citations  ?  W^hat  interval 
 is  necessary  betv/een  different  admonitions,  or  be- 
 tween admonition  and  citation,  and  between  cita- 
 tion and  compearance  ?  Of  how  many  citations 
 doth  the  neglect  infer  contumacy  ?  Whether  simple 
 contumacy,  without  a  particular  crime,  or  a  parti- 
 cular crime  without  any  contumacy,  be  a  sufficient 
 ground  of  excommunication  ?  What  different  church 
 censures  are  there  ?  What  scandals  may  Presby- 
 teries judge  of,  and  what  not  ?  May  murderers, 
 usurers,  and  such  as  do  not  pay  their  just  debts,  be 
 excommunicated  ?  If  so,  why  should  not  all  the 
 thieves  of  the  Highlands  and  borders,  and  mer- 
 chants be  excommunicated  ?  May  an  appeal  be 
 made  from  an  inferior  to  a  superior  judicatory  ?  Is 
 
72  A  COMrFNDIOUS    IIISTUKV  01    TIIF 
 
 the  sentence  suspended  during*  an  appeal  to  a 
 hi^^her  court?  Ou«;lit  all  processes  to  be  extracted 
 tor  the  helionf  of  parties  ?  Is  summary  excommu- 
 nication, without  any  citation,  lawful  ?  May  any 
 but  pastors  vote  in  a  sentence  of  excommunication  ? 
 ilath  every  church  judicatory  equal  jiower  to  ex- 
 communicate offenders  ?  May  Papists,  who  were 
 never  members  of  our  chur(  h,  be  excommunicated  ? 
 May  Christian  kinj^rs  annul  notoriously  unjust  ex- 
 communications ?  May  a  whole  council  and  uni- 
 versity be  excommunicated  ?  And  for  what  ?  By 
 whom?  And  in  what  manner?  Tf  the  clergy  ne- 
 glect their  duty,  may  Christian  kings  rectify  their 
 disorders?  May  fasts  for  general  causes  be  appoint- 
 ed by  Christian  i)rinces  ?  IMay  church  courts  re- 
 quire persons  to  give  an  oath  of  purgation  ?  .Alay 
 points  relative  to  civil  rights  be  judged  in  church 
 courts  ?  'I'hese  (|uestions  had  answers  returned  to 
 them  by  order  of  the  Synod  of  Fife,  and  by  Patrick 
 (Talloway,  and  by  anotlier  minister  of  a  more  zea- 
 lous cast. 
 
 Soon  after,  James  called  an  assembly  at  Perth, 
 and  took  care  to  have  an  hitherto  unparalleled  num- 
 ber of  north  country  clergymen  to  be  members  of 
 it.  After  no  small  disputing,  the  majority  voted 
 it  to  have  the  power  of  a  General  Assembly.  Drop- 
 ping a  numi)er  of  his  above  mentioned  questions, 
 James  required  them  to  declare.  That  it  should  Ije 
 lawful  for  either  the  prince,  or  any  pastor,  to  move 
 their  doubts,  and  crave  information  concerning  any 
 part  of  their  government,  which  is  not  exj)ressly 
 appointed  in  the  word  of  God  ;  that  no  minister 
 should  publicly  meddle  with  affairs  of  state,  or 
 with  any  of  his  Majesty's  lau  s  and  ordinances  ; 
 l)ut  if  they  think  them  w^rong,  privately  com])lain 
 to  himself  and  his  council ;  tliat  no  minister  shall 
 publicly  point   out  any  transgressors,  except  fugi- 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  73 
 
 lives  and  excommunicated  persons,  so  as  the  hearers 
 may  know  them  ;  that  none  shall  meddle  with  any 
 point  not  pertinent  to  his  own  congregation  ;  that 
 every  Presbytery  shall  take  care  of  these  in  their 
 bounds  behaving  regularly  in  these  matters  ;  that 
 three  different  citations,  with  eight  days  of  inter- 
 val, shall  precede  every  excommunication  ;  that 
 no  Presbytery  or  Synod  shall  censure  any  person 
 who  doth  not  reside  in  their  bounds ;  that  all  cita- 
 tions shall  contain  the  cause  and  crime  for  which 
 the  person  cited  are  to  answer ;  that  except  their 
 ordinary  meetings  of  Session,  Presbytery,  or  Synod, 
 ministers  shall  hold  no  convention  without  his  ma- 
 jesty's consent ;  that  in  principal  towns  no  minis- 
 ter shall  be  chosen  without  the  consent  of  their 
 particular  flocks,  and  of  his  majesty  ;  that  some 
 discreet  ministers  shall  be  appointed  at  a  proper 
 time  to  reason  upon  the  rest  of  his  questions  ;  and 
 that  till  that  be  done  none  shall  touch  upon  them 
 either  in  pulpits  or  judicatories  ;  and  that  some  of 
 the  northern  clergy  shall  be  appointed  to  absolve 
 the  Earl  of  Huntley  from  his  excommunication, 
 providing  he  give  them  full  satisfaction.  The  con- 
 sciences of  this  pliant  Assembly  could  not  come  up 
 to  the  Avhole  of  James's  demands :  but  they  did 
 what  they  could  to  gratify  him.  They  fixed  as 
 terms  of  satisfaction  for  Huntley,  that  he  should 
 renounce  the  Popish  religion,  subscribe  the  national 
 covenant,  join  in  communion  with  the  church  ;  and 
 in  the  kirk  of  Aberdeen  profess  his  sorrow  for  his 
 apostacy  and  murder — and  that,  as  an  evidence  of 
 his  sincerity,  he  should  reconcile  himself  to  those 
 that  had  promoted  his  prosecution,  and  should  pro- 
 vide sufficient  stipends  for  the  kirks  on  his  lands. 
 At  the  request  of  Angus's  countess,  and  of  Errol 
 himself,  ministers  were  appointed  to  deal  with 
 them,  and  to  absolve  them  on  the  same  terms  as 
 
 L 
 
74  A  COMPENDIOUS    HiSTOllY    Ul-    THli 
 
 [lunlloy,  except  in  that  whicli  related  to  the  niiii- 
 (icr  of  the  Kail  of  Murray,  in  which  An^us  ami 
 Krrol  had  no  hand.  Meanwhile,  t(j  please  the  faith- 
 ful party,  this  Assemhly  supj)li(ate(l  James  to  j)ub- 
 lish  a  declaration  of  his  real  intentions  to  maintain 
 the  true  Protestant  relij^ion  and  discipline  present- 
 ly professed,  and  to  banish  from  his  kini^doni  all 
 obstinate  l*a])ists,  Jesuits,  and  exconnnunicated  i)tr- 
 sons,  and  apprehend  and  imprison  them  if  they 
 should  return  ;  and  to  relax  his  outlawry  against 
 the  ministers  of  Edinburgh  and  otherii,  and  allow 
 Messrs.  Black,  Howison,  and  Welsh  to  return  to 
 their  flocks;  to  deal  favourably  with  the  city  of 
 l^dinbur^h,  notw  ithstanding  the  late  mob,  or  other 
 provocations;  to  promote  the  due  punishment  of 
 such  as  had,  or  should  assault,  hurt,  or  mutilate 
 ministers;  and  to  provitle  suHicient  stipends  where 
 they  were  wanting.  He  pretended  that  he  was 
 ready  to  grant  all  their  desires,  except  what  jc- 
 lated  to  the  outlaws  mid  banished. 
 
 Few  besides  the  commissioners  from  Fife  came 
 up  to  the  ordinary  meeting  of  the  General  Assem- 
 bly in  April  J5<J7-  After  confession  of  their  sins, 
 they  took  a  solemn  protestation  for  the  liberties  of 
 the  church.  In  May,  King  Jameses  second  Asscm- 
 hlij  met  at  Dundee.  As  he  had  called  them  toge- 
 ther, his  will  was  their  rule,  and  to  please  him  and 
 his  council  was  their  great  end.  Upon  information 
 from  the  Presbyteries  of  Murray,  Aberdeen,  and 
 Angus,  concerning  the  excommunicated  lords,  these 
 Pr(  sbyteries  were  appointed  further  to  deal  w  ith 
 tlu  ni,  and  to  receive  them  upon  tern)s  much  the 
 same  as  above  mentioned.  'J'iiey  added  some  ex- 
 plications to  the  declarations,  which  had  been  re- 
 (piired  or  given  at  Perth.  They  answered  the  rest 
 of  James's  ensnaring  questions  as  much  to  his  con- 
 tent as  they  could,     'i'iiey  appointed  a  commission 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  75 
 
 of  their  number  to  confer  with  his  majesty  for  pro- 
 moting" of  perfect  harmony  with  him  and  his  coun- 
 cil, and  to  execute   the  articles   which   had  been 
 passed.     Thus,  I  think,  began   the  Commissions  of 
 the  General  Assemblies,   which   have  often  trans- 
 acted more  public  v/ork  than  the  Assembly  itself. 
 These  commissioners  now  appointed,  together  with 
 James  and  his  agents,  dressed  up  matters  to  their 
 pleasure  ;  and  the  Assemblies  as  their  tools  turned 
 their  will  into  the  form  of  acts.     To  prevent   the 
 faithful  ministers  from  counteracting  their  designs, 
 the  principal  of  them   were  put  out  of  the   way. 
 Black   and   Wallace  were   removed  from   St.  An- 
 drew's.    A.  Melvin  had   been  put  from  his  rector- 
 ship, and  expelled  the  university,  had  not  the  cla- 
 mour of  the  people   and   of  the  foreign   students 
 obliged  them  to  let   him  alone.     But,  to  prevent 
 his  interfering  with  the  government  of  the  church, 
 James  and  his  ecclesiastical  commissioners  enacted, 
 That  no  masters  or  professors  in  universities  should 
 vote  in  any  church  courts  upon  matters  of  discipline. 
 The  Popish  lords  being  restored  to  the  fellowship 
 of  the  church,  the  Parliament  which  met  in  De- 
 cember restored  them  to   all   their  civil  privileges 
 and  honours.      Some  years   before,   mention    had 
 been  made  of  ecclesiastical  commissioners  to  sit  in 
 Parliament  as  the  third  estate,   instead  of  the  dig- 
 nitaries  of  the   Popish  church  ;  but   without  any 
 hint  whether  they  should  be  clergymen  or  not. 
 Now   the  ecclesiastical  commission   insisted,  that 
 some  ministers  should  have  vote  in  Parliament  in 
 order  to  secure  the  interests  of  the  church.     The 
 abbots,  priors,  and  lords  of  session   opposed  it   as 
 derogatory  to  their  power.     But  James  got  it  car- 
 ried ;  and  the  more  easily,  as  the  other  estates  of 
 Parliament  thought  that  no  Presbyterian  minister 
 would  accept  the   Popish  title  of  bishop,  ahbul,  or- 
 
76  A   COMPRNDIOL'S   HISTORV    OF  THE 
 
 prior,  in  order  to  enjoy  sudi  promotion.  Havin<; 
 carried  this  point,  James  and  liis  ecclesiastical  com- 
 mission appointed  next  General  Assembly  to  meet 
 at  Dundee,  two  months  sooner  tlian  had  been  in- 
 tended. After  it  had  met,  and  aj::reed  to  hury 
 some  grievances,  and  a|)pointeti  another  conimis- 
 sion,  and  James  had  allowed  the  banished  ministers 
 to  return  to  their  changes  in  Edinburi;!),  c\:e.  he, 
 in  a  solemn  hara!ii;ue,  represented  to  the  Assembly 
 the  necessity  of  some  ministers  voting  in  Parlia- 
 ment, and  protested,  that  he  had  no  intention  to 
 introduce  any  Popish  or  English  bishops,  but  was 
 merely  concerned  for  the  welfare  of  the  church. 
 The  speeches  of  those  ecclesiastical  commissioners 
 that  thirsted  for  episcopal  sees,  were  but  an  echo 
 to  his.  After  much  warm  dtbate  it  carried,  that 
 about  /if hj  one  ministers  should  have  a  vote  in  Par- 
 liament as  commissioners  from  the  church,  but  un- 
 der strict  limitations,  in  order  to  prevent  their  as- 
 suming any  [)ower  over  their  brethren.  JMr  David- 
 son of  Preston-Pans  entered  a  solemn  protestation 
 against  this  act,  but  it  was  not  allowed  to  be  marked. 
 The  terror  of  his  majesty's  presence  kept  many  of 
 his  brethren  from  adhering  to  his  protest.  But  he 
 had  no  sooner  crossed  the  Tay  in  his  way  home, 
 than  about  three  or  fourscore  sul)scribed  it,  tlinugh 
 it  was  afterward  thought  prudent  to  cut  off  their 
 names.  This  Assembly  further  enacted.  That  the 
 minutes  of  Synods  be  brought  up  to  every  Assem- 
 bly in  order  to  be  examined  ;  that  none  be  married 
 till  they  be  thrice  lawfully  jiroclaimed  ;  that  such 
 ministers  as  celebrate  clandestine  marriages  be  de- 
 posed ;  and  that  the  parties  satisfy  the  church  by 
 pitb/ic  repentance  ;  that  no  images  be  carried  about 
 at  burials  ;  that  Presbyteries  meet  every  week  ; 
 and  that  a  proposition  of  divinity  be  handled  in 
 tlieir   meeting  once  a  month  ;  that   every  minister 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  77 
 
 have  a  weekly  examination  of  part  of  his  congre- 
 gation ;  that  every  Presbytery  send  up  commis- 
 sioners to  the  Assembly,  not  above  three  in  their 
 own  name,  and  a  ruling  elder  in  name  of  the  barons, 
 and  two  ruling  elders  from  Edinburgh,  and  one  in 
 the  name  of  every  other  burgh. 
 
 About  the  beginning  of  1599,  James  appears  to 
 have  been  seized  with  a  fit  of  zeal  for  the  Romish 
 abominations.  Beaton,  the  old  Popish  archbishop 
 of  Glasgow,  was  restored  to  his  dignity,  and  ap- 
 pointed ambassador  to  the  court  of  France.  James 
 transmitted  an  affectionate  missive  to  his  Holiness, 
 and  requested  that  the  bishop  of  Vaison,  a  Scotch- 
 man, might  be  created  a  cardinal,  and  empowered 
 to  act  in  the  correspondence  betwixt  them.  Edward 
 Drummond  was  instructed  by  James  to  negotiate 
 with  the  Pope  and  his  cardinals  for  promoting  this 
 design.  This  affair  happening  afterward  to  be  di- 
 vulged, secretary  Elphingston,  who  had  been  made 
 Earl  of  Bal merino,  took  the  blame  upon  himself, 
 and  had  a  sham  process  directed  against  him,  on 
 that  account.  But  few  that  consider  James's  con- 
 stant  regard  to  the  Popish  party,  and  the  mean 
 shifts  with  which  he  ordinarily  attempted  to  cover 
 his  base  designs,  will  doubt  of  his  being  the  real 
 author  of  that  letter.  In  his  Basilicon  doron,  pub- 
 lished that  year,  he  declares,  That  parity  among 
 ministers  is  inconsistent  with  monarchy;  that  with- 
 out bishops,  the  three  estates  of  parliament  cannot 
 be  established  ;  that  presbyterian  zealots  seek  to 
 establish  a  democracy/  in  the  state  ;  that  kings  ought 
 to  hate  none  more  than  proud  Puritans,  and  ought 
 never  to  suffer  their  chiefs  in  any  kingdom. 
 
 To  make  voting  of  ministers  in  Parliament  go 
 down  the  more  quietly  with  the  nation,  several 
 conferences  were  held  concerning  it.  These  of 
 Falkland,  where  the  caveats  were  considered,  and 
 
78  A  COMPENDIOUS    HISTORY  OF    THE 
 
 of  llolyroodlionse,  were  the  most  noted.  In  the 
 last,  after  readint:^  the  act  of  Assembly  at  Dundee, 
 concernin<;  these  commissioners  from  the  chur(h  to 
 vote  in  Parliament,  and  the  caveats  for  llmitinrr  their 
 ponrr,  the  ministers  entered  on  the  dispute,  hut 
 could  neither  a^ree  upon  the  lawfulness  of  their 
 votin^^,  or  ihe  title  that  should  he  ^iven  them. 
 Highly  provoked  with  the  hold  speeches  and  un- 
 answerable reasoninf^s  of  Andrew  Melvin  and  his 
 friends,  .James  threatened,  that  if  they  wouhi  not 
 fill  up  the  third  estate  of  Parliament  with  their  ec- 
 clesiastical commissioners,  he  would  fill  it  up  as  he 
 j)leased.  His  majesty  still  needing  the  assistance 
 of  the  complaisant  clergy  of  the  north,  the  Assem- 
 bly, 1600,  met  at  Montrose.  This  affair  was  in- 
 troduced by  a  conference  between  four  on  each 
 side.  Patrick  Sharp,  James  Melvin,  Patrick  Simp- 
 son, and  David  Barclay,  on  the  one  hand,  main- 
 tained, That  the  acts  of  Parliament,  and  Assem- 
 bly, appointing  ministers  to  vote  in  Parliament, 
 are  directly  contrary  to  the  word  of  God, — as  all 
 ecclesiastical  prelacy  and  carnal  dignity  are,  Luke 
 xxii.  25,  26.  Matth.  xx.  26.  1  Tim.  iii.  Tit.  i. 
 1  Pet.  V.  1 — 3.  As  it  makes  men,  who  are  sepa- 
 rated to  the  service  of  God,  turn  back  to  the  world 
 and  the  offices  of  it.  Num.  iii.  44,  45.  and  xviii.  6. 
 Deut.  X.  8.  and  xviii.  12.  Acts  xiii.  1,  2,  3.  Rom. 
 i.  1.  As  it  hinders  ministers  from  their  proper 
 work,  Luke  ix.  .0.9,  60.  Deut.  xxxiii.  8.  Acts  vi. 
 '2.  hinders  them  from  ])reaching  the  word  in  season 
 and  out  of  season,  1  Chron.  ix.  33.  2  Tim.  iv.  2. 
 •lohn  xxi.  1.5,  16,  17-  Acts  xx.  20,  28,  As  it  re- 
 presents the  ministerial  charge  to  be  light  and  in- 
 considerable, contrary  to  Kzek.  iii.  xxxiii.  Zech. 
 xi.  17.  Acts  XX.  20,  28,  .Si.  1  Pet.  v.  2.  2  Cor. 
 ii.  1.0 — 17.  lleb.  xiii.  17.  As  it  confounds  offices 
 and  jurisdictions,    which   God   hath    distinguished. 
 
CHUllCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  79 
 
 Num.  xviiii.  4,  7.  2  Chron.  xvii.  xix.  Matth.  xxii. 
 21.  Deut.  xxii.  9 — 11.  As  it  makes  ministers  to 
 meddle  with  things  not  pertaining  to  their  office, 
 1  Pet  iv.  15.  .John  xvi.  15,  and  xviii.  36,  Luke 
 xii.  13,  14.  John  viii.  11.  As  it  entangles  Christ's 
 soldiers  in  the  affairs  of  this  life.  Num.  iv.  3.  2 
 Tim.  ii.  4.  As  it  hath  no  example  in  the  Christian 
 church  for  almost  eight  hundred  years  after  Christ; 
 — as  the  offices  of  magistrates  and  ministers  are  so 
 different  in  their  subjects,  matter,  manner,  and  end 
 of  administration  ; — and  as  this  church  hath  ex- 
 pressly prohibited  ministers  to  be  notaries,  farmers, 
 innkeepers,  <§c. 
 
 So  strong  was  the  reasoning,  and  so  firm  the  op- 
 position, that  James,  by  all  his  authority  and  craft, 
 could  not  obtain  that  these  commissioners  should 
 be  continued  till  death,  or  till  some  fault  should 
 render  them  unworthy  of  their  power,  but  merely, 
 that  they  should  be  chosen  every  year.  But  he 
 and  his  party  got  the  act  so  marked  in  the  minutes, 
 as  to  import  no  more,  than  that  they  should,  every 
 year,  give  an  account  of  their  conduct,  and  lay 
 down  their  commission  at  the  feet  of  the  Assembly. 
 The  Caveats,  formerly  agreed  upon  in  the  con- 
 ference at  Falkland,  were  ingrossed  into  this  act, 
 and  imported.  That  the  Assembly,  with  advice  of 
 Presbyteries  and  Synods,  should  nominate  six  out  of 
 every  district,  from  whom  his  majesty  should 
 choose  one ;  That  these  commissioners  should  ne- 
 ver propose  any  thing  in  name  of  the  cl^urch,  with- 
 out special  direction  from  her,  or  such  things  as 
 they  can  answer  for  to  her ;  that,  under  pain  of 
 deposition,  they  should  never  forbear  to  oppose 
 what  was  prejudicial  to  the  liberty  of  the  church; 
 that,  under  pain  of  infamy  and  excommunication, 
 they  should  give  account  of  their  conduct  to  every 
 Assemblv,  and  obtain  a  ratification  of  it ;  that  thev 
 
80  A   COMPENDIOUS    HISTORV  01     THE 
 
 should  rest  contented  w  ith  whatever  benefice  the 
 king  allows  them,  without  attempting  to  hurt  the 
 salary  of  any  other  minister;  that  they  should 
 neither  directly  nor  indirectly  dilapidate  their  be^ 
 nefices,  nor  grant  any  disposition  or  lease  of  it, 
 without  consent  of  his  majesty  and  the  General 
 Assembly;  that  they  should  continue  to  execute 
 the  office  of  pastor  to  their  congregation  in  all 
 points,  and  be  subject  to  the  trial  of  Presbytery 
 and  Synod,  as  other  brethren  ;  that,  under  pain  of 
 deprivation,  and  of  the  nullity  of  every  thing  after- 
 ward transacted  by  them,  they  should  never  claim 
 any  power  above  their  brethren  in  the  exercise  of 
 church  government ;  that  in  Presbyteries,  Synods, 
 and  General  Assemblies,  they  should  in  all  things 
 behave  as  other  ministers ;  that  before  their  admis- 
 sion to  their  commissionersJtipy  they  should  swear  to 
 observe  the  above  limitations  exactly ;  and  that  up- 
 on their  deposition  from  the  ministry,  they  should 
 lose  their  benetice  and  seat  in  j)arlianient. — It  was 
 further  ordained,  That  they  should  have  no  vote 
 in  General  Assemblies,  unless  by  virtue  of  a  com- 
 mission from  their  [)resbyteries ;  and  that  their 
 ambitus  or  using  of  any  means  to  obtain  j)refer- 
 ment,  should  be  sustained  a  sufficient  cause  of  de- 
 privation.— This  Assembly  appointed  a  commission 
 to  finish  their  work,  any  nine  of  whom,  with  his 
 majesty  and  his  agent,  made  a  quorum  or  number 
 sufficient  for  acting. 
 
 Convinced  that  James's  veracity  was  little  to  be 
 depended  upon,  Messrs.  Pruce,  Halcancpiel,  Bal- 
 four, Watson,  and  Hall,  ministers  of  Kdinburgh, 
 hesitated  to  jiublish  his  representation  of  his  dan- 
 ger and  his  deliverance  from  a  conspiracy  of  the 
 Ei^rl  of  Gowry  and  his  brother  at  Perth,  in  the 
 way  of  public  thanksgiving  to  (;od.  He  there- 
 fore   prohibited  them   to  preiu  h    in    his   dominions. 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  81 
 
 under  pain  of  death.  As  the  citizens  would  ac- 
 cept of  no  other  in  their  stead,  he  was  obliged 
 to  permit  them  all  to  return,  except  Mr.  Bruce, 
 who  therefore  retired  to  France.  Njor  did  James 
 rest,  till  he  had  g-ot  Balcanquel,  Balfour,  and 
 Watson,  transported,  and  some  of  his  own  crea- 
 tures put  in  their  place. 
 
 To  prevent  the  faithful  ministers'  attendance, 
 or  ready  opposition  of  his  measures,  James  caus- 
 ed the  General  Assembly  to  meet  at  Burnt- 
 island, in  May  1601,  ten  weeks  sooner  than 
 had  been  appointed.  Nevertheless,  Messrs. 
 Davidson  of  Prestonpans,  and  James  Melvin  of 
 Anstruther,  transmitted  their  monitory  letters, 
 obtesting  all  the  members  to  be  faithful  to  the 
 cause  of  Christ,  in  opposition  to  the  manifold 
 corruptions  then  creeping  in.  To  deceive  the 
 honest  party,  James  and  his  complaisant  dupes 
 joined  them  in  assignation  of  the  causes  of  the 
 decay  of  religion,  and  of  proper  remedies  there- 
 of: viz,  the  wrath  of  God  on  account  of  the  con- 
 tempt of  the  Gospel ;  the  sloth  of  ministers,  and 
 their  neglect  to  discover  apostates  from  the  Pro- 
 testant religion;  the  want  of  able  ministers, 
 especially  where  the  Popish  Lords  and  other 
 nobles  reside ;  the  rash  admission  of  candidates 
 into  the  ministerial  office ;  the  untender  conver- 
 sation of  ministers,  and  their  suiting  of  them- 
 selves to  the  humours  of  their  people ;  the  de- 
 solation of  the  churches  of  Edinburgh ;  the  ad- 
 vancement of  ill  affected  persons  into  places  of 
 power  and  trust ;  the  education  of  his  majesty's 
 children  in  the  company  of  Papists,  and  of  the 
 young  nobility  by  suspected  masters ;  the  decay 
 of  schools ;  the  overlooking  of  the  restored 
 Lords'  non-performance  of  the  terms  of  theii 
 
 M 
 
82  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORV  OF  THE 
 
 reconcilement.  Tl)oy,  however,  took  care  to 
 make  no  mention  of  their  own  attempts  to  over- 
 turn the  reformation  which  had  !)een  attained, 
 and  to  render  the  churcli  dependent  on  the  mere 
 will  of  the  civil  ma^n^trate. — Not  lon^  after, 
 Mr.  Bruce  was  permitted  to  return  home;  but 
 it  was  required  of  him  to  imitate  his  other  hesi- 
 tating brethren,  and  in  different  places  to  inti- 
 mate from  the  pulpit  his  belief  of  James'  account 
 of  the  perhaps  altogether  ])retended  conspiracy, 
 lie  abhorred  such  sinlnl  and  sneaking  compli- 
 ances, and  so  continued  under  the  royal  frowns. 
 
 The  next  General  Assendjly  was  appointed  to 
 meet  at  St.  Andrew's,  in  the  end  of  July  J  602: 
 but  James,  to  mark  his  spiritual  supremacy, 
 transferred  it  to  llolyroodhouse,  on  the  10th  of 
 November  following.  At  the  entry,  James 
 IMelvin  protested  against  the  change  of  the  day. 
 The  ministers,  who  had  been  appointed  to  deal 
 with  f  limtley,  Errol,  Angus,  Honjc,  and  Herreis, 
 reported  their  conduct :  but,  except  that  of  those 
 who  had  attended  Errol,  it  was  little  to  the  pur- 
 pose. Notwithstanding  their  former  negligence, 
 young  Spotswood  and  the  rest  were  appointed 
 to  deal  further  with  them,  and  with  the  other 
 Popish  Lords,  INIaxwel  and  Semple.  A  nume- 
 rous committte  was  appointed  to  visit  the 
 church,  and  inijuire  into  the  conduct  of  minis- 
 ters, congregations  and  presbyteries  ;  and  Rules 
 of  visitation  were  presc  riU'd.  But  the  leading 
 men  in  it  were  too  intent  on  preUuieal  dignities 
 to  execute  this  work  to  any  good  purpose. 
 
 'J'he  Synod  of  Fife  piesented  a  number  of 
 grievances  ;  That  General  Assend)lies  were  not 
 regularly  held  according  to  the  laws  of  God  and 
 the  land,  or  the  necessity  of  the  church,  but  th^ 
 
dHtJRCtt  OP  SCOTLAND.  83 
 
 diets  of  meeting  altered  without  the  knowledgt? 
 or  consent  of  either  presbytery  or  synod  ;  that 
 ministers  were  summoned  before  the  privy  coun- 
 cil at  first  instance,  to  answer  for  their  doctrine, 
 or  manner  of  discipline ;  that  applications  in 
 presbyterial  exercises  were  condemned  ;  that  the 
 government  of  the  church  was  put  into  the  hand 
 of  a  few  commissioners,  to  the  injury  of  pres- 
 byteries, and  synods ;  that  the  doctors  of  uni- 
 versities were  debarred  from  General  Assem- 
 blies; that  the  observation  of  the  caveats,  by 
 the  church's  commissioners  to  vote  in  parlia- 
 ment, is  not  inquired  into ;  that  the  alteration 
 of  the  ministers  at  Edinburgh  hath  much  hurt 
 the  cause  of  religion,  and  encouraged  its  ene- 
 mies ;  that  laws  for  church  government  have 
 been  made,  contrary  to  the  judgment  of  almost 
 the  half  of  the  ministry  ;  that  the  land  is  defiled, 
 and  the  church  hurt,  by  indulging  the  French 
 ambassador  in  the  free  and  public  use  of  his 
 idolatrous  mass ;  that  excommunicated  Papists 
 are  allowed  to  continue  in  the  country;  that 
 the  absolved  nobles  give  no  evidence  of  their 
 professing  any  thing  but  Popery ;  that  pains  are 
 taken  to  conceal  the  danger  of  the  church  from 
 faithful  ministers  or  professors ;  that  church  dis- 
 cipline is  not  duly  executed  against  incest,  mur- 
 der, adultery,  or  the  like :  To  this  heavy  com- 
 plaint, scarce  any  other  answer  than  a  mere  shift 
 was  returned. 
 
 But  with  much  more  pleasure,  the  Assembly 
 considered  a  plan  for  the  enlargement  of  their 
 stipends  ; — and,  at  James's  desire,  allowed  of  the 
 celebration  of  marriage  on  the  Lord's  day  ;  and 
 ordered,  that  all  who  made  profession  of  the 
 Protestant  faith  should  have  their  children  bap- 
 
84  A  COMPENDIOUS  IIISTOUY  OP  THE 
 
 tized.  Yoiin^  Spotswood  was  accused  of  attend- 
 ing mass  in  France:  but  James  and  his  com- 
 plaisant cleij^y  got  tliis  matter  hushed. — Tliis 
 Assembly  was  far  from  being  free.  INIessrs.  11. 
 Bruce,  J.  Davidson,  and  A.  Melvin,  were  ex- 
 pressly prohibited  to  come  near  it.  Such  as 
 faithfully  sj)()ke  their  mind  were  upbraided  and 
 mocked  by  the  king  or  tne  moderator,  and  com- 
 manded to  be  silent.  Not  long  after,  some  fur- 
 ther pains  were  taken  with  Mr.  Bruce  to  make 
 him  approve  James's  account  of  Cjowrie's  conspi- 
 racy. But,  finding  that  no  condescension  would 
 procure  his  restoration  to  his  flock  at  Edinburgh, 
 he  would  make  none,  and  re])resented  his  rea- 
 sons to  the  town  council.  'J'he  commission  of 
 the  Assembly  declared  his  kirk  vacant,  and  at 
 the  same  diet,  ap[)roved  a  marriage  between  two 
 adulterers,  both  of  whose  former  yoke-fellows 
 were  still  living,  and  absolved  them  from  the  ex- 
 communication inflicted  on  ihem  by  the  minis- 
 ters of  the  south. 
 
 When  James  set  off  for  London  to  receive  the 
 English  crown  in  A.  D.  KiOS.  all  the  imj)ris(in<Hi 
 malefactors  were  liberated.  But  A.  IMelvin  and 
 J.  Davidson  had  their  confinement  continued, 
 and  R.  Bruce  continued  secluded  from  his 
 charge.  A[)prehending  that  James's  communion 
 with  tlie  FiUglish  church  would  lead  him  to  at- 
 tempt a  reducing  of  the  Scotch  to  the  sanie 
 forms  of  worship  and  government,  the  synod  of 
 Fife,  in  1601",  appoiiUed  some  of  their  number 
 to  present  their  faithful  advice  to  the  Assembly's 
 commission,  begging  them  to  insist  for  a  parlia- 
 mentary ratification  of  all  forme;  laws  made  in 
 favours  of  the  church,  and  to  protest,  that  any 
 thing  enacted  contrary  to  the  religion  presently 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  85 
 
 established  by  either  commission,  or  otherwise, 
 should  be  held  null  and  void;  and  to  insist,  that 
 none  should  vote  in  parliament,  in  the  name  of 
 the  church,  but  such  as  bear  office  in  her,  and 
 are  appointed  by  her;  and  that  such  commis- 
 sioners shall  not,  under  pain  of  deposition,  pro- 
 pose any  thing  in  parliament  in  the  name  of  the 
 church,  without  express  direction  from  her ;  nor 
 keep  silence,  when  any  thing  detrimental  to  her 
 interests  is  proposed ;  and  that  care  be  taken, 
 that  no  prejudice  be  done  to  her  doctrine,  wor- 
 ship, discipline,  or  government,  by  the  intended 
 UxVioN  of  Scotland  with  England. 
 
 Spotswood,  now  made  archbishop  of  Glasgow^ 
 instead  of  Beaton  the  Ilomish  priest,  Gladstones, 
 bishop  of  Galloway,  and  Lindsay,  bishop  of  Ross, 
 being  appointed  commissioners  for  regulating 
 the  terms  of  that  union,  marked  an  absolute 
 unconcern  about  every  thing  religious.  But  the 
 Earl  of  Morton  Insisted  for  a  clause  in  their 
 commission,  bearing.  That  the  state  of  religion 
 in  doctrine  and  discipline  should  be  preserved 
 in  Scotland.  In  vain,  he  also  begged  the  com- 
 mission of  the  Assembly  to  assist  in  securing' 
 that  point,  though,  with  difficulty  enough,  he 
 procured  an  act  or  clause,  bearing,  that  the  re- 
 ligion presently  established  in  Scotland  shall  not 
 be  in  the  least  prejudiced  by  the  intended  union 
 of  the  two  kingdoms ; — which  his  opponents 
 took  care  to  keep  out  of  their  records. — iMean- 
 wiiile,  under  deep  apprehensions  of  their  danger, 
 the  presbytery  of  St.  Andrew's  and  synod  of 
 Lothian  renewed  their  subscription  of  the  na- 
 tional  covenant,  and  Spotswood,  nominal  arch- 
 bishop of  Glasgow,  and  John  Law  his  successor, 
 subscribed  among  them. 
 
86  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 AVith  Kin^^  James's  own  consent,  the  Assembly 
 at  Holyroodhouse  had  appointed  their  next 
 meetincr  at  Aberdeen,  in  July  IfiOl.  Jiut  the 
 ecclesiastical  commissioners  to  sit  in  parliament, 
 fearing  to  give  account  of  their  conduct,  pro- 
 cured a  delay.  James  required,  that  the  meet- 
 ing should  be  deferred  till  the  union  of  the  two 
 kingdoms  should  be  deliberately  considered,  and 
 a  new  warrant  for  holding  it  emitted.  NevtTthe- 
 less,  the  presbytery  of  St.  Andrew's,  zealous  for 
 the  liberties  of  the  church,  appointed  Messrs. 
 James  Melvin,  William  Erskine,  and  William 
 Murray,  their  commissioners  to  attend  it.  Up- 
 on the  day  appointed,  they  repaired  to  the  place 
 of  meeting  in  Aberdeen,  and  solemnly  protested, 
 That  the  hurt  that  should  happen  to  Christ's 
 church,  by  the  neglect  of  this  meeting,  shoidd 
 not  be  imputed  to  them,  or  their  constituents. 
 Instigated  by  some  northern  ministers,  the  pres- 
 bytery of  St.  Andrew's,  by  their  missives  and 
 otherwise,  procured  such  a  number  of  correspon- 
 dents from  other  parts  of  the  kingdom  to  attend 
 at  next  synod  of  Fife,  that  I.auriston,  the  king  s 
 commissioner  for  ecclesiastical  alTairs,  fearing^ 
 that  it  would  turn  out  a  General  Assembly, 
 procured  an  order  from  the  privy  council  to  hin- 
 der their  meeting.  But  finding,  that  they  only 
 claimed  tlie  powers  of  a  synod,  he  forbore. 
 Heavy  complaints  were  made,  that  the  church's 
 commissioners  to  vote  in  parliament  did  not  ob- 
 serve the  CAVKATs;  and  that  some  who  IkuI  been 
 nominated  to  bishoprics,  voted  without  any  com- 
 mission.— The  synod  agreed  to  petition  his  Ma- 
 jesty.  That  General  Assemblies  might  be  regu - 
 Jarly  held,  according  to  the  act  of  parliament, 
 and  the  former  custom  of  this  church  :   that  Pa 
 
 J 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  87 
 
 pists  and  contemners  of  church  discipline  might 
 be  prosecuted  by  the  civil  judges ;  that  he  him- 
 self would  interpose  for  the  protection  of  the 
 persecuted  English  Puritans,  and  for  the  redress 
 of  such  ministers  as  had  their  salaries  injured  by 
 the  last  modification  of  stipends. 
 
 James  had  appointed  the  meeting  of  the  Ge- 
 neral Assembly  at  Aberbeen,  July,  ^,  1605,  un- 
 less he  should  convene  it  sooner.  The  fearful 
 abounding  of  scandal,  Popery,  and  almost  every 
 thing  horrid,  made  presbyteries  and  synods  to 
 supplicate  for  the  hastening  of  this  meeting. 
 But  Spotswood,  Hall,  Gladstones,  and  Galloway, 
 their  commissioners  to  his  Majesty,  betrayed 
 them,  and  chiefly  courted  his  favour  and  prela- 
 tical  preferments. — When  the  time  of  meeting 
 drew  near,  James  transmitted  orders  not  to  hold 
 it.  And  to  confound  commissioners,  some  co- 
 pies of  this  order  represented  the  2d,  and  others 
 the  5th  of  July,  as  the  day  formerly  appointed. 
 No  more  than  nineteen  members  met  on  the  2d 
 day.  When  Lauriston  saw  them  determined  to 
 proceed  regularly  to  business,  he  left  them.  Mr. 
 John  Forbes  being  chosen  Moderator,  they  read 
 the  order  of  the  privy  council  requiring  them  to 
 dissolve,  and  to  appoint  no  new  diet  of  meeting : 
 they  agreed  to  proceed  to  no  further  business  at 
 present;  but  appointed  their  next  meeting  at 
 Aberdeen,  upon  the  last  Wednesday  of  Septem- 
 ber next,  and  appointed  the  several  presbyteries 
 to  direct  their  commissioners  to  it.  As  they 
 were  about  to  dismiss,  Lauriston  returned  and 
 protested,  That  from  the  beginning  he  did  not 
 acknowledge  them  a  lawful  Assembly.  Upon 
 the  5th  of  July,  Mr.  John  Welsh  and  other 
 ^even  commissioners  from  the  south  and  west: 
 
88  A  COMPRNDIOUS   HISTORY   OF  THE 
 
 came  up,  antl  finding  the  meeting  dissolved,  pro- 
 tested that  they  eame  up  to  keep  it,  and  that 
 they  approved  of  what  had  heen  done.  Return- 
 ing to  the  privy  eouneil,  Lauriston  affirmed, 
 That  upon  INIonday  the  first  of  July,  he  liad,  by 
 a  public  proclamation  at  the  cross  of  Al>erdeen, 
 j)rt;hibit(.'d  the  meetin^T  of  Assend)ly  in  his  ma- 
 jesty's name.  Hut  though  multitudes  were  on 
 the  spot  the  whole  day,  not  one  could  testify 
 that  he  heard  this  public  proclamation.  To 
 corroborate  Lauriston's  false  affirmation,  it  is 
 said,  that  the  clerk  ante-dated  the  indorsement 
 of  the  charge. 
 
 The  ministers,  who  had  kept  this  meeting  of 
 the  Assembly,  were  immediately  prosecuted  be- 
 fore the  privy  council.  The  magistrates  of 
 Aberdeen  were  charged  to  prevent  the  meeting 
 in  September;  and  presbyteries  and  synods  pro- 
 hibited to  own  the  validity  of  the  late  meeting. 
 The  ecclesiastical  commission  readily  declared  it 
 void  anil  null  to  all  intents.  After  three  months 
 imprisonintMit  in  Blackness  castle, — and  vindica- 
 tion «)i  their  own  conduct,  and  declining  of  the 
 privy  council  as  incompetent  judges,  iMessrs. 
 John  Forbes,  John  Welsh,  Robert  Dury,  Andrew 
 Duncan,  Alexander  Strachan,  and  John  Sharp, 
 were  condemned  to  perpetual  banishment  from 
 the  kingdom,  as  guilty  of  high  treason  ;  and  had 
 probably  been  hanged,  had  not  the  terrible  fer- 
 ment ot  the  nation  intimidated  James  and  his 
 council.  iMessrs.  Charles  Fairholm,  John  iMonro, 
 Nathaniel  Inglis,  James  Greig,  William  Forbes, 
 John  Ross,  and  Robert  Voungson,  after  lying  in 
 dilVerent  prisons,  were  banished  to  remote  parts 
 of  the  kingdom.  All  ministers  were  prohibited 
 publicly  to  pray  for,  or  make  honourable  men- 
 tion of  their  condemned  brethren. 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  89 
 
 Neither  the  terrible  pestilence,  of  which  about 
 "/OjOOO  are  said  to  have  died  in  or  about  London, 
 and  not  a  few  about  Edinlxir^h,  St.  Andrew's, 
 &c.  nor  his  own  and  his  English  Parliament's  re- 
 markable deliverance  from  immediate  destruc- 
 tion by  the  Popish  gun-powder  plot,  diverted 
 James  from  his  beloved  work  of  persecuting  the 
 faithful  ministers  of  Christ,  and  introducing  the 
 English  Episcopacy  into  Scotland.  Upon  some 
 new  revival  of  Mr.  Bruce's  hesitation  to  believe 
 his  account  of  Cowrie's  conspiracy,  he  was  con- 
 fined to  Inverness.  A.  and  J.  Melvin,  James 
 Balfour,  William  Scot,  John  Carmichael,  Robert 
 Wallace,  Adam  Coult,  and  William  Watson, 
 were  called  out  of  the  way  to  London,  under 
 pretence  of  conferring  with  them  concerning  the 
 lawfulness  of  the  meeting  at  Aberdeen,  and  the 
 proper  method  of  holding  General  Assemblies, 
 &c.  James  Melvin  died  in  his  return  home.  Af- 
 ter three  years  imprisonment,  on  account  of  a 
 short  Latin  satire  on  the  English  worship  in  his 
 Majesty's  Chapel,  Andrew  was  permitted  to  re- 
 tire to  France,  where  he  died. 
 
 Meanwhile,  James  having  called  a  Parliament 
 at  Perth  in  1606,  which  solemnly  acknowledged 
 his  supremacy  in  all  causes,  and  appointed  an 
 oath  of  the  same  import  to  be  sworn  upon  the  gos' 
 pels-  They  also  restored  the  estate  of  bishops 
 to  all  their  ancient  honours,  rights,  and  revenues  ; 
 and  erected  chapters  for  their  respective  sees. 
 Against  this  deed  the  two  Mel v ins,  just  before 
 they  set  off  for  London,  with  about  forty  others, 
 of  whom  Ballantyne,  Abernethy,  and  Cooper, 
 were  afterward  bishops,  entered  a  solemn  protes- 
 tation, bearing,  That  it  was  contrary  to  the  word 
 of  God,  their  national  covenant,  the  constitutions 
 
 N 
 
00  A  COMPKNDIOLS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 of  this  cliurcl),  and  the  laws,  jieaco,  and  lionoiii 
 of  the  kins^doin.  Tlicir  reasons  were  nioru  lar^^'^c- 
 ]y  explained  in  a  tract  then  |)ul)lishcd  under  the 
 title  of  The  course  of  Conforinity.  An  Asseml)lj 
 was  soon  after  held  at  Liriiithi^ow,  which  con- 
 sisted of  such  statesmen,  and  of  such  clcr^ynieu 
 as  James  called  uj),  without  any  re^^ird  to  com- 
 missions from  their  respective  IVeshyteries.  Un- 
 der |)retence  of  zeal  against  Poj>ery,  they  a|)- 
 pointed  a  minister  in  every  Presljytery,\vho  should 
 inform  the  privy  council  against  Papists,  and  who 
 should  have  a  yearly  salary  of  an  hundred  pounds 
 Scots  for  his  pains,  and  also  the  honour  of  con- 
 stantly moderating  in  his  Presbytery,  till  proper 
 course  should  be  taken  with  the  Pa])ists,  and  the 
 peace  of  the  church  settled.  They  supplicated 
 iiis  Majesty  in  favours  of  such  of  the  banished 
 ministers  as  should  confess  their  faults  to  him. 
 The  nominated  bishops  j)rotested,  That  they  in- 
 tended to  usurp  no  pre-eminence  over  their 
 brethren.  Some  cautions  were  proposed  for  li- 
 mitation of  the  j)Owcrof  the  constant  moderators. 
 Nevertheless,  the  managers,  within  about  six 
 months,  had  the  miiuite  so  formed,  as  to  bear, 
 that  the  constant  moderators  of  Presbyteries 
 shoulil  be  constant  members  of  General  Assem- 
 blies, and  the  bisho[)s  or  their  vicars  constant 
 moderators  in  Synods.  Fully  persuaded  that  his 
 innovations  would  meet  with  warm  opposition, 
 James,  by  a  proclamation,  solemnly  chargeil  all 
 the  NOMiNEKs  to  accept  of  their  new  honours, 
 and  all  Presbyteries  and  Synods,  u'luler  pain  of 
 rebellion,  to  accept  ol'  their  constant  moderators. 
 Nevertheless,  several  of  the  ministers  nominateil 
 to  be  constant  moderators  oi'  l^esbyteries,  refus- 
 <jd  that  promotion.     -Many  l*rcsbyterics,  and  all 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND,  91 
 
 tlie  Synods,  except  that  of  Angus,  absolutely  re- 
 fused their  constant  moderators.  Some  Presby- 
 teries admitted  them  only  when  compelled  to  it 
 under  pain  of  rebellion,  and  upon  condition  that 
 the  matter  should  be  canvassed  in  a  free  and 
 lawful  General  Assembly,  which  they  did  not 
 think  that  of  Linlith£;'ow  to  be.  The  principal 
 opposers  were  banished,  imprisoned,  or  otherwise 
 persecuted ;  such  ministers  as  needed,  or  hoped 
 for  augmentation  of  their  stipends,  could  not 
 obtain  letters  of  prosecution  for  it,  before  the 
 bishops  or  constant  moderators  granted  them 
 w^arrants  for  that  purpose. 
 
 James  intended  to  convene  another  Assembly 
 at  Linlithgow  for  promoting  his  introduction  of 
 bishops.  By  causing  some  commissiuners,  who 
 had  been  long  before  appointed  to  visit  the  Pres- 
 byteries, and  procure  commissioners  to  it ;  and 
 by  a  zealous  spreading  of  Dr  Downham's  ser- 
 mon in  favours  of  the  English  Episcopacy,  he 
 and  his  agents  laboured  to  promote  their  cause. 
 Nor  were  the  faithful  ministers  inactive.  They 
 offered  public  disputations  in  favour  of  their  prin- 
 ciples. They  circulated  proper  forms  of  commis- 
 sion and  instructions  for  those  that  should  be  de- 
 puted to  the  Assembly  from  Presbyteries,  bearing, 
 That  they  should  insist  in  the  Assembly,  That 
 Synods  and  Presbyteries  should  have  the  power 
 of  choosing  their  own  moderators  established  to 
 them ;  that  none  charged  with  any  particular 
 commission  from  the  Assembly  should  be  mo- 
 derator of  Presbytery,  Synod,  or  Assembly  ;  that 
 the  acts  against  non-residence,  at  their  charges, 
 negligence,  and  other  corruptions  of  ministers, 
 sjiould  be  duly  executed  ;  and  that  none  but  such 
 
S2  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 as   had    commissions   from   Presbyteries    should 
 have  any  vote  in  (General  Assem!)iies. 
 
 In  July   HjOS,  the  Assembly  met       After  a  de- 
 ce'tful  flourish  ol  searchint^  out  the  causes  of  the 
 increase  of  Pop?  i  v,   and  of   re-excnmnnini(  atin^ 
 the  Karl  of  Huntley,  and  ^ivin^  order  for  the  ex- 
 conmumication    of  Anji^us,    Krrol,   and    Semplc, 
 and  of  jjroposinti  methods  for  the  delation  of  other 
 Papists,  they  attempted   to    j)roceed  to   the  rsta- 
 hlhhmvnt    of  bishops  ;    but    finding     themselves 
 unable  to  carry  an  art  for  that  purpose,  they  ron- 
 tinued  most  of  the  former  mend)ers  in  their  com- 
 mission, eleven  of  whom  were  nominated  bishops, 
 and    eleven    of  whom   were  declared  a  rjuonn/iy 
 having  full  power  to  act.      To  impose  on  minis- 
 ters less  zealous  or  judieious,  commissioners  were 
 appointed  to  travel   between  parties,    in  order  to 
 firjd  some  midlum  m  their  differences,  relative  to 
 the  doctrine  and   discipline    of  the   chi-rch       In 
 J\lay  160J^  a  conference  was  held  at  I'alkirk,  for 
 procuring-  the  consent  of  o|iposers   to    the  intro- 
 duction of  Prelacy.      But  notiiing  was  gained  in 
 its  several  diets.     Another   conference   was  ap- 
 pointed at   Stirling.      But  the  bishops  and    their 
 votaries  did    not    attend   it,    as    they  found  that 
 they  could  not   carry  their  cause  by  the  force  of 
 reasoning,   even    after   James    had    removed   A. 
 Alelvin,  and  many  (»t  their  ablest  opponents,  out 
 of  the  way.      In  June  that   same  year,   the  Par- 
 lianient  appointed  the  bishops  to  transmit  once 
 ever)  year  a  list  of  all  the  Papists  in  their  several 
 dioceses  to   the  council  ; — ratified  the  resfura/iun 
 of  bishops  to  their  ancient  dignities,  powers,  and 
 pnrogaiives,  alway  reserving  to  the  king  his  su- 
 premacy in  all  causes  ccclisicLsfica/  and  civil  ;  and 
 made  an  act  relative  to  the  apparel  of  civil  judges, 
 
tnURCII  OF   SCOTLAND.  93 
 
 prelates  having  vote  in  Parliament,  and  minis- 
 ters ;  leaving  it  to  his  majesty  to  prescribe  the 
 particular  forms  of  the  clerical  vestments. 
 
 Archbishop  Spotswood  having  become  an  ex- 
 traordinary Lord  of  the  Session,  about  the  be- 
 ginning of  A.  D.  1610,  led  the  way  for  himself 
 and  his  clerical  partisans  to  screw  themselves 
 further  into  civil  offices.  Soon  after  he  and  Glad- 
 stones, archbishop  of  St.  Andrew's,  had  each  of 
 them  a  royal  warrant  to  hold  High  Commission 
 courts  within  their  respective  boundaries,  which 
 might  punish  persons  as  they  pleased  in  a  civil 
 or  an  ecclesiastical  manner.  Their  appointed 
 assistants  were  noblemen,  bishops,  gentlemen, 
 and  ministers,  some  of  which  last  appear  to 
 have  been  nominated  merely  for  form  sake,  as 
 it  could  not  be  expected  that  they  would  accept 
 of  any  such  antichristian  and  arbitrary  power. 
 But  the  archbishop,  with  any  four  that  he  pleased, 
 were  declared  a  quorum^  sufficient  to  transact 
 business.  The  bishops  having  become  lords  in 
 Parliament,  Privy  Council,  Exchequer,  and  Ses- 
 sion, possessors  of  extensive  property  and  juris- 
 diction, patrons  of  many  benefices,  moderators 
 in  Synods,  stated  commissioners  of  the  General 
 Assembly,  and  principal  members  in  the  king's 
 courts  of  high  commission,  a  General  Assembly 
 was  called  at  Glasgow  in  June  l6iO,  when  no 
 body  expected  it,  and  just  after  his  majesty,  by 
 his  proclamation,  had  required  another,  ap[K)int- 
 ed  a  few  days  before,  not  to  be  held.  It  con- 
 sisted of  169  members,  viz.  constant  moderators 
 of  Synods  and  Presbyteries,  who  already  had 
 their  annual  salaries  of  100  pounds,  and  hoped 
 for  better  at  his  majesty's  hand,  together  v»  ith 
 such  commissioners  from   Presbyteries   as   were 
 
 1 
 
94>  A   CO.MPKNDIOrS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 rerkoncd    scdiicible    into    the    measures    of   the 
 court.      Plenty  of  bribes,  under  the  name  iA'  sub- 
 sistence moneij,  were  distributed  amon^them,  and 
 others  had  better  stipends  promised  tiiem.      'J'he 
 northern  eleri^y  came  up  trom  tlie  remotest  cor- 
 ners, and   brought  with    them   consciences   suffi- 
 ciently complaisant.      'J'he  llarl   of  l)unl)ar,    at- 
 tended by  a  troop   of  his   majesty's   life   guards, 
 did  all  that  he  could  to  promote  his  master's  in- 
 tintions.       'J'hey    condemned    the    Assem!)ly    of 
 IGO.A  at  Aberdeen,  as  an  Hnlawjid   and   seditious 
 nlcetin^'.       I'hey    acknowledi^ed    the    power   of 
 callini,''  Assend)lies  to  be  an  inherent  ri^ht  of  the 
 crown.      They  enacted,    That    no    ordination    of 
 pastors  should  be   confirmed   unless    it   was  con- 
 summated by  the  bishoj)  ;   that  no  minister  shoidd 
 l)e  deprived  without  the    (onsent  ol    the  bishop  ; 
 that  bishops  or  their  vicars   should  preside  in  all 
 provincial  Synods    and  (General    Assemblies,  and 
 iiave    the    sole    power    ol    visit iui;-    the   dioceses. 
 Under  pretence  of  only   changin«j^   the    name  of 
 Pfrsljj/tiricSy  which  they  said  was  offensive  to  his 
 majesty,  into  the  vicitinu;s  oj'fhc  ministers  of  their 
 hounds,   they    left  bishops    at  liberty    to   choose 
 whom  they  pleased  for   n'itnes.u-s  rather   than  as- 
 sistants  in    tlu  ir  acts  of  jurisdiction.      They  fur- 
 ther enacted,   That   all    presentations   should  be 
 directed  to  bi>h()|)s  instead  of  Presbyteries  ;   that 
 no  excommunication    or    absolution    should  take 
 j)lace  without  the  bishop's  direction  ;   that  minis- 
 ters absenting  of  themselves  from  episcojial  visi- 
 tations of   their  dioceses    should  inia  suspension 
 and  deposition,  if  continued    in  ;   that  every  en- 
 trant should,  at    his  admission    to   the    ministry, 
 swear  alh  i^iance  to    his  majesty  as   supreme   otq- 
 vernor  in  the  conservation  and  purgation  of  reli- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  QJ 
 
 gioii,  as  well  as  in  things  temporal ;  to  which,  it 
 seems,  they  afterward  clandestinely  added  ohc- 
 dience  to  his  oj'dinarij,  i.  e.  bishop  of  the  bounds, 
 &c. ;  that  marriage  should  be  celebrated  upon 
 the  Lord's  day,  if  people  desired  it ;  that  the  two 
 archbishops,  three  other  bishops,  and  three  others 
 appointed  by  them,  should  deal  with  his  majes- 
 ty for  the  planting  of  vacancies.  They  also 
 formed  some  sham  directions  for  the  bishops,  and 
 asserted  the  necessity  of  General  Assemblies, 
 and  their  power  over  bishops:  and  finally  enacted. 
 That  no  minister,  under  pain  of  deposition, 
 should  publicly  speak  against  their  acts,  or  treat 
 of  the  equality  or  inequality  of  ministers,  in  the 
 church  of  Christ.  As  IMessrs.  Patrick  Simsou 
 and  Walter  Balcanquel,  and  others,  loudly  in- 
 veighed against  the  apostacy  and  perjury  of  the 
 bishops,  James,  by  a  proclamation,  charged  all 
 his  subjects,  under  the  highest  pains,  not  to  im- 
 pugn, but  obey  all  the  acts  of  the  Assembly, 
 aiid  to  inform  the  next  magistrate  or  some  mem- 
 ber of  the  privy  council  of  every  thing  contrary 
 which  they  knew  ;  and  charged  all  judges  and 
 magistrates  immediately  to  imprison  all  trans- 
 gressors, ministers  or  others. 
 
 As  James  and  his  votaries  did  not  expect,  that 
 even  their  above  packed  Assembly  would  distin- 
 guish the  office  of  a  bishop  from  that  of  a  pastor, 
 in  the  manner  of  Bancroft,  and  other  late  high- 
 fliers in  England,  no  mention  was  made  in  it  of 
 the  consecration  of  bishops.  But  soon  after, 
 Spotswood  of  Glasgow,  Lamb  of  Brechin,  and 
 Hamilton  of  Galloway,  posted  to  London  for  it ; 
 and  on  their  return  consecrated  their  brethren 
 without  consulting  either  Presbytery  or  Synod. 
 Gladstones  of  St.  Andrew's  met  with  verv  little 
 
9(S  A   COMl'KNDiOUS    HISTORY  OK   THli 
 
 ojiposition  ill  iUc  Synod  of  An^iis,  hut  in  tlic^e 
 of  V'li'v  and  Lothian,  with  niurli  more  than  he 
 wished.  W  Ik  ii  the  Parliament  m(>t  in  16 1 2, 
 they  formally  (fn/mffrd  their  (KhmI  of  i5i)2y  cstd- 
 Ulshhiij;  Prcshijicnf  ;  they  ratified  the  acts  of  the 
 late  Assembly  of  (ilasi^ow  with  explications, 
 curtailments,  enlaii^ements,  and  alterations.  By 
 this  act  of  J  Parliament,  hishops  were  I'reed  from 
 all  trial  of  their  lifi'  or  doctrine  by  the  General 
 Assend)ly  ;  they  miii^ht  dej)ute  w  hom  they  pleased 
 to  he  moderatcjrs  in  Synods  ;  they  mii^ht  dispose 
 of  all  henefiees  to  which  the  patron  did  not  pre- 
 sent a  qualified  candidate  within  six  months  from 
 the  commencement  of  the  vacancy  ;  if  the  !)ishoj) 
 refused  to  admit  his  candidate,  the  patron  mifjht 
 appeal  to  the  archbishop,  and  from  him  to  the 
 lords  of  Session  or  privy  council, "  that  they,  by 
 letters  of  horninof,  mii^ht  ohli<;e  the  bishop  of  the 
 diocese  to  do  his  duty.  In  the  oath  for  entrants 
 to  the  ministry,  they  must  swear  allei^iance  to 
 the  kinu^  as  suj)reme  in  all  causes  spiritual  and 
 errh'siastiral  as  well  as  temporal,  and  swear  obe- 
 dience to  their  ordinary.  It  was  not  required, 
 that  men  should  be  forty  years  of  ag-e,  or  ten 
 years  in  the  ministry,  before  their  election  to 
 bishopricks  ;  nor  was  the  continuance  of  the 
 weekly  meetings  of  ministers  in  the  least  men- 
 tioned. 
 
 After  a  little  breathing,  James  and  his  agents 
 pushed  on  their  designs.  In  16 1. G,  all  adult 
 subjects  were  commanded  to  receive  the  Lord's 
 su|)per  at  Easter  in  all  time  coming.  Spotswood 
 being  now  archbishop  of  St.  Andrew's,  and  Law 
 of  (rlasgow,  they  united  their  hi<xh  commission 
 courts,  in  order  to  render  their  sentences  more 
 powerful  and  striking;  and  <bur  members,  with 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  97 
 
 one  archbishop,  had  full  power  to  transact  busi- 
 ness.    None  might  appeal  from  their  decisions 
 to  either  privy  council,  or  lords  of  session.     As 
 Popery  still  increased,  and  the  Earl  of  Huntley 
 made  considerable  disturbance   in   the   country, 
 the  Assembly  of  Aberdeen,   in    1616,  made  no 
 small  empty  noise  how  to  check  the  increase  of 
 Popery,  and  promote   the  conviction  or  punish- 
 ment of  Papists.     They  published  a  new  Con- 
 fession of  Faith,  chiefly  directed  against  the  errors 
 and  corruptions   of  the  Romish  church ;  and  to 
 exclude  the  national  covenant,  they  appointed  all 
 officers  in   the   church,   and  students  in  the  col- 
 leges to  swear  and  subscribe  it.     They  also  ap- 
 pointed bishops  Galloway,   Hall,  and  Adamson, 
 to  compose  a  small  catechism  for  public  use,  in 
 order  to  exclude  those  of  Ci^aig  and  Davidson. 
 Upon    some  sham  submission,  they  absolved  the 
 excommunicated  Earl  of  Huntley.  But  the  chief 
 design  of  their  meeting  was  to  resolve  on  com- 
 posing a  Liturgy  and  Book  of  Canons  for  discipline. 
 In  summer  1617,  James,  paying  a  visit  to  his 
 native  country,  laboured,   with  all  his  might,   to 
 promote  the  ecclesiastical  conformity  with  Eng- 
 land.    In   his  own  chapel  at  Holyroodhouse,  he 
 introduced  a  pompous  celebration  of  the  Lord's 
 A^w/jjot^r  with  sacred  vestments,  instrumental  music, 
 and  other   superstitions   of  the   English   cathe- 
 drals : — and   soon    after  required  all  his  bishops 
 and  nobles  that  were  present  in  Edinburgh  to  re- 
 ceive it  in  the   same  manner.     But  scarce  the 
 half  of  the  lords  would  receive  it  kneeling. — 
 The   Parliament,  meeting  June  1 7th,   the  Lords 
 of  the  Articles  framed  some  acts  for  depriving  the 
 church  of  the  poor  remains  of  her  power ;  one  of 
 which  imported.   That  his  majesty,  with  the  ad- 
 
 o 
 
08  A  coMrrNnm?  N  ni^rnuv  of  tiik 
 
 vice  of  siirli  l»isli()|)>  or  minirlcrs  as  Ik?  pKasod  to 
 c'onsult,  sliniilil  \\i\vv  lull  puvver  to  detcrinine  all 
 matters  relative  to  the  external  government  of 
 the  (hurcli.  In  formed  hereof,  //////  ministers 
 omitted  a  solenni  protestation  ai^ainst  it.  Hall, 
 Struthers,  and  Ramsay  of  Kdinbur^Hi,  quickly  pro- 
 lessed  their  repentance,  liut  Arciiihald  Simson 
 of  Dalkeith,  P.  Steuart  of  Kdiid)iirgii,  and  David 
 C'alderwood  of  Crailing,  beini^  far  less  pliable, 
 were  de[)rived  from  their  oflice,  and  confined. 
 Calderwoodwas  troubled  for  not  attending  Synod, 
 notwithstanding  the  high  commission  had  pro- 
 hi!)ited  him  to  attend  part  of  the  time.  He  was 
 banished  the  kingdom.  Nevertheless  this  spirit- 
 ed opposition  made  the  Parliament  to  supersede 
 their  act. 
 
 In  IGU),  James  had  hinted  his  intentions  to 
 introduce  kneeling ^X,  the  Lord's  table;  the  sacred 
 observation  of  the  festivals  of  Christ's  birth,  death, 
 and  ascension,  and  of  the  descent  of  the  Holy 
 Ghost;  i\\^  private  administration  of  baptism  and 
 the  Lor d^s  Supper,  together  with  t^e  confirmation 
 of  children^  by  laying  on  of  the  bishop's  hands. 
 liis  bishops  represented  to  him,  that  it  would  be 
 necessary  to  get  these  articles  authorized  by  a 
 General  Assembly.  After  he  and  his  tools  had 
 tixed  upon  the  mendiers,  one  was  indicted  upon 
 J. 5  days  warning,  to  meet  at  St.  Andrew's  in  No- 
 vember, 1017.  Hut  here  his  majesty  met  with 
 more  opposition  than  was  ex[)ectcd.  They  only 
 yielded  to  allow  the  communion  privately  to  sick 
 persons,  providing  there  were  a  proper  number 
 ])resent,  and  the  minister  gave  the  elements  out 
 of  his  own  hand.  Highly  (dlended  with  their 
 partial  com|)liance,  and  with  their  delay  of  the 
 principal  points,  James  ordered  that  none  of  the 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  99 
 
 Opponents  or  non-Uquds  should  have  any  modifica- 
 tion of  their  stipends  for  that  year.  But  coolin/^ 
 at  last,  he  indicted  another  Assembly  at  Perth 
 next  year,  which  he  took  care  to  pack  with  such 
 nobles  and  gentlemen,  as  he  knew  would  scarce 
 stick  at  any  thinj^  to  please  him,  while  his  bi- 
 shops, with  promises  of  augmented  stipends, 
 took  care  to  secure  a  proper  number  of  minis- 
 ters. Archbishop  Spots  wood,  having  mounted 
 the  chair  as  moderator,  James's  expostulatory 
 letter  was  read, — and  seconded  by  the  declama- 
 tions of  Spotswood,  and  of  Young,  an  Episcopa- 
 lian doctor  from  England.  Spotswood  disdain- 
 fully rejected  every  motion  made  by  his  oppo- 
 DCTits ;  and,  without  regard  to  either  Presbytery 
 or  Synod,  nominated  the  committee  of  overtures. 
 To  induce  the  Assembly  to  comply  with  his  ma- 
 jesty's will,  it  was  promised,  that  none  should  be 
 obliged  to  practise  these  ceremonies  ;  and  that  he 
 would  never  seek  to  introduce  any  more  from 
 England.  Such  as  offered  to  reason  against  the 
 ceremonies  proposed  were  rebuked,  and  threat- 
 ened. Nevertheless ybr(z/^2;e  ministers,  one  no- 
 bleman, and  one  doctor  of  a  university,  voted 
 against  them. 
 
 The  Assembly  had  no  sooner  carried  an  act  for 
 the  above  mentioned  articles,  than  James  ratifi- 
 ed their  deed  by  a  public  proclamation ;  appoint- 
 ed his  subjects  to  refrain  from  labour  on  the  four 
 festivals  specified ;  and  denounced  the  most  ri- 
 gorous punishment  in  person  and  property 
 against  all  that  should  dare  to  disobey  his  man- 
 dates. The  introduction  of  kneeling  in  receiving 
 the.  Lord's  supper  occasioned  terrible  confusion. 
 Messrs.  William  Arthur,  Richard  Dickson,  John 
 Murray,   Pvobert  Bovd,  Robert  Blair,  John  Ker, 
 
iOO  A  COMPENDIOUS    HISTQIIY  OF   TUB 
 
 Thomas  Hoc;;',  Andrew  Duncan,  Henry  Blyth, 
 David  Forrester,  Rolieit  Bruce,  John  Weenis, 
 John  Scrim^eor,  Jolin  (iillespie,  John  Hume, 
 Geor^^e  Grier,  James  Porteous,  William  Living- 
 ston, John  Ferguson,  Archihalii  Simson,  and 
 many  other  eminently  holy  and  faithfid  ministers 
 were  prosecuted  before  the  hi^^h  commission, 
 which  deprived,  fined,  or  imprisoned  such  as  re- 
 fused compliance  with  the  articlks,  or  testified 
 a^^ainst  the  prevalent  corruptions.  Robert  Bruce's 
 principal  crime  u  as,  that  he  and  some  of  his  bre- 
 thren had  kept  two  private  fasts  at  his  house  in 
 Old  Monkland.  Richard  Lawson,  James  Cathkin, 
 John  IMein,  William  Ri^g,  and  others  in  Edin- 
 burgh, and  in  other  places,  where  their  pastors 
 informed  against  them,  were  cruelly  persecuted 
 by  the  high  commission,  for  scrupling  to  kneel 
 at  the  communion,  and  to  observe  the  appointed 
 festivals,  t\:c.  INIeanwhile,  such  was  the  tender 
 sympathy  of  the  court  party  for  the  idolatrous 
 and  treacherous  Papists,  that  Anderson,  a  traf- 
 ficking priest,  being  apprehended,  was  kindir 
 set  at  liberty,  and  honestly  apparelled,  and  had 
 his  charges  paid,  got  a  compliment  of  ^100 
 wSterling,  and  then  was  safely  conveyed  to 
 France. 
 
 After  the  bishops  and  their  agents  had  very 
 unsuccessfully  laboured  three  years  in  the  intro- 
 duction of  the  Art'u Ics  of  Perth,  the  Parliament 
 at  Edinburgh,  IGSil,  solemnly  ratified  them, 
 though  not  without  great  opposition.  Fifteen 
 of  the  nobility,  and  Jorty -Jour  of  the.  commission- 
 ers from  burghs,  voted  against  this  deed.  Not- 
 with^tan(ling  his  majesty's  charge  to  all  the 
 malecontcnt  clergy  to  remove  from  the  city,  and 
 all  possible  care  to  restrain  their  access  to  Parlia- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  101 
 
 ment,  a  number  of  them  sent  up  a  warning  a- 
 gainst  the  ratification  of  the  Articles,  and  after- 
 wards entered  a  solemn  protestation  against  it. 
 While  the  Marquis  of  Hamilton,  as  the  king's 
 commissioner,  rose  to  touch  the  act  with  the 
 sceptre,  three  terrible  flashes  of  lightning  dart- 
 ed into  his  face,  attended  with  claps  of  thunder, 
 which  broke  almost  immediately  on  the  Parlia- 
 ment House,  and  such  a  darkness  and  rain  as  had 
 not  been  known  in  the  memory  of  man.  Some 
 interpreted  these  things  as  marks  of  God's  ab- 
 horrence, and  others  as  marks  of  his  approbation 
 of  the  Parliment's  deed,  which  enacted.  That  in 
 token  of  their  deep  humility,  every  partaker 
 should  receive  the  communion  on  his  knees  ;  that 
 the  Lord's  Supper  should  be  administered  to  per- 
 sons long  sick,  or  apparently  dying,  providing 
 there  were  three  or  four  fellow  partakers ;  that, 
 in  case  of  necessity,  baptism  should  be  privately 
 administered  to  infants,  and  report  made  thereof 
 to  the  congregation,  next  Lord's  day ;  that  after 
 proper  instruction  by  their  minister,  children 
 about  eight  years  of  age  shall  be  solemnly  con- 
 firmed by  the  bishop  of  the  diocese,  with  prayer 
 and  laying  on  of  hands ;  and  that  the  seasons  of 
 Christ's  bi?ih,  death,  ascension,  and  effusion  of  the 
 Holy  Ghost,  be  religiously  commemorated  by  ser- 
 mons, abstinence  from  labour,  and  the  like. 
 When  this  deed  was  proclaimed  at  the  Cross  of 
 Edinburgh,  Dr.  Barclay  fixed  one  copy  of  the 
 ministers'  protestation  on  the  cross,  another  on 
 the  church  door,  and  a  third  on  the  gate  of 
 Holyroodhouse,  and  took  instruments  with  the 
 usual  solemnities. 
 
 Having  now  got  the  civil,   as  well  as  the  ec- 
 clesiastical law,  on  his  side,  James,  by  letters  to 
 
102  A   COMrKNDlUUS   UlSTUUV   UF   THK 
 
 till'  hisliops,  whit  li  wtro  prohalily  planned,  if  not 
 coni[)lctcly  fornicd  by  tliernsclvcs,  and  subscribed 
 at  their  desire,  enjoined  the  most  rigid  execution 
 of  it:  and  they  took  care  to  obey  him.  For 
 quietly  eomin:;;  from  his  place  of  confinement 
 to  Edinburi^Hi,  about  an  aiVair  of  20,000  merks 
 value,  Mr.  Uubert  I*ru(i',  once  reckoned  by  Janus 
 worth  the  half  of  his  kin^^chjm,  was  imprisoned 
 in  the  castle,  and  John  Welsh,  whom,  after  lit 
 years  exile,  grievous  bodilv  trouble  had  forced 
 from  France,  was  di'nied  allowance  to  die  in  liis 
 native  country.  While  (iod  by  most  terrible 
 rains  ruined  the  crop,  and  carried  otf  the  bridges 
 of  Berwick  and  Perth,  Messrs.  John  3Iurray, 
 John  Row,  David  Dickson,  George  Dunbar, 
 George  Johnston,  and  others,  were  deprived,  ba- 
 nished, and  confined  by  the  high  commission.  It 
 being  re[)orted,  That  J^avid  Calderwood,  whose 
 Altarc  Damasccnum,  printed  in  both  Latin  and 
 English,  had  so  galled  the  Kpiscopal  party,  iiad 
 died  in  Holland,  Patrick  Scot,  it  is  said,  by  his 
 majesty's  direction,  published  a  recantation  in  his 
 name;  and  to  prevent  his  rcl'uting  it,  went  to 
 Holland  to  seek  him  out,  ami  murder  him  if  he 
 were  still  alive. 
 
 As  the  sessions,  council,  and  citizens  of  Edin- 
 burgh, had  long  used  to  meet  on  the  Tucsdai/  be- 
 fore the  administration  of  the  Lord's  Supper,  in 
 order  to  make  known  and  remove  whatever  ob- 
 jections they  had  against  their  ministers, — Bailie 
 William  Uigg,  .John  Dickson,  John  Fleming, 
 James  Nairn,  and  .lohn  Nairn,  being  interrogat- 
 ed, by  the  provost,  objected,  that  Mr.  Forbes, 
 afterwaid  bishop,  had  taught,  I'hat  there  was  but 
 little  dillVrence  between  the  Papists  and  Protes- 
 tants in  ihe  doctrine  of  justiticalion  ;   and  James 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  •  103 
 
 Cathkin,  John  Mein,  and  others,  having  desired 
 the  administration  of  the  communion  in  the  for- 
 mer manner, — William  Rigg,   John  Dickson,  a 
 butcher,  John  Hamilton,  apothecary,  John  ]Mein, 
 and  William  Simson,  were  cited  before  the  privy 
 council.  ^  Bailie  Rigg  was  first  confined  to  his 
 own  house,  and  afterwards  imprisoned  at  Black- 
 ness, and  fined  in  fifty  thousand  pounds  Scots. 
 William  Simson  and  John   Dickson   were  con- 
 demned to  imprisonment  in  the  common  jail  of 
 Edinburgh;    John    Mein    at    Elgin;    and  John 
 Hamilton    at   Aberdeen,    and    fined    in    twenty 
 thousand  merks  Scots. 
 
 Notwithstanding  all  that  James  and  his 
 bishops  could  do  to  prevent  the  spread  of  Cal- 
 dervvood's  A/tare  Damascenuin,  which  so  effectu- 
 ally demolished  the  whole  structure  of  the  Eng- 
 lish hierarchy  and  superstition, — and  his  Course 
 of  Conformity,  with  several  other  tracts,  which 
 had  been  printed  in  Holland,  many  copies  of 
 them  were  secretly  transmitted  hither,  and 
 greedily  purchased  and  read.  The  death  of 
 Hamilton,  the  zealous  promoter  of  the  Articles 
 of  Perth  in  the  parliament,  and  of  James  him- 
 self, in  the  beginning  of  A.  D.  1625,  gave  a 
 transient  check  to  the  persecuting  rage :  and 
 Robert  Bruce,  and  no  doubt  several  others, 
 were  permitted  to  leave  their  respective  con- 
 finements. 
 
 But  in  vain  either  church  or  state  expected 
 happiness  under  Charles  I.  who  pursued  the 
 maxims,  and  copied  the  pattern  of  his  father. 
 He  was  scarcely  proclaimed  king  at  Edinburgh, 
 when  his  clergy  notified  their  intention  to  have 
 the  communion  celebrated  on  the  following  Sab 
 
104  ^   COMPKNDIOUS   niSTOKV  OF  THR 
 
 bath,  which  was  Easter.  Rut  the  callinf^  of 
 people  and  ministers  to  meet  on  the  'I'lie^day 
 before,  for  the  removal  of  offences  and  dillVren- 
 ces,  was  omitted.  This  was  reckoned  liie  !nf)re 
 j;rievous,  as  the  Articles  of  Perth  hatl  occasi  'oed 
 inanifold  prejudices  and  contentions  amyriiT  li  ose 
 that  had  formerly  lived  in  the  most  j>irlect 
 friendship.  Charles  having;'  appointed  a  nuiional 
 fast  on  the  '20th  of  July,  the  presbyteriari  mini- 
 sters added  to  his  reasons  others  of  thi'ir  own. 
 The  warm  opponents  of  the  Articles  of  Perth 
 and  others,  bein^  informed  of  Ids  pretences  to 
 piety  and  moderation,  dispatched  Mr.  Robert 
 Scot  of  Glasgow,  to  j)resent  their  sr.opiication 
 for  a  redress  of  that  i;rievance.  instead  of 
 regarding  it,  Charles,  by  a  letter  to  Spotswood, 
 instigated  him  and  his  fellow  bishops,  to  proceed 
 in  the  course  into  which  l.is  father  had  put 
 them.  I'hey  extolled  his  pi*  ty  to  the  highest, 
 and  so  zealously  obeyed  his  orders,  that  if  a 
 minister  but  conformed  to  Episcopacy  and  the 
 Articles  of  Perth,  he  was  almost  in  no  danger  of 
 being  quarreled  for  any  thing  else. 
 
 Provincial  synods  had  now  little  more  left 
 them  than  the  name.  Bisliops,  or  their  depu- 
 ties, were  their  constant  modeiators.  The  con- 
 stant moderators  of  presbyteries,  and  a  few 
 others  chosen  by  the  bishoj»s,  or  their  agents, 
 formed  into  the  privy  conference  or  committee 
 of  overtures,  had  the  whole  power  of  managing 
 affairs.  Nevertheless,  as  some  still  continued 
 zealous  for  the  presby  terian  form  of  government, 
 and  for  the  wonted  simplicity  of  gospel  worship, 
 Charles  issued  forth  a  public  proclamation,  bear- 
 ing, That  he  did  not  in  the  least  intend  to  alter 
 the  government  of  the   church  presently  esta- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  IQ^ 
 
 blished ;  and  that  siicli  as  should  dare  to  disturb 
 it,  or  suggest,  that  he  intended  to  alter  it  in 
 favours  of  the  non-conformists,  should  be  punish- 
 ed. This  encouraged  his  bishops  to  endeavour 
 the  removing  of  all  that  scrupled  to  conform 
 from  all  places  of  power  and  trust.  Charles 
 himself,  by  a  letter,  required  the  tovv^n  council 
 of  Edinburgh  to  elect  none  for  maf^istrates  but 
 such  as  observed  the  articles  of  Perth :  and  about 
 the  same  time  issued  forth  a  proclamation  against 
 all  Papists  and  Non-conformists.  But  the  Pa- 
 pists vi^ere  protected  and  cherished,  as  they  were 
 of  the  queen's  religion,  and  not  disliked  by  the 
 managers.  Having  modelled  the  Court  of  Ses- 
 sion to  his  pleasure,  he  formed  his  privy  council 
 of  forty-seven,  that  of  the  Exchequer  of  fifteen, 
 and  the  High  Commission  of  seventeen  mem- 
 bers, which  last,  in  the  manner  of  the  English 
 one,  had  power  to  call  before  them  whomsoever 
 they  pleased,  for  transgressing  the  acts  of  par- 
 liament, or  for  speaking  against  his  majesty  or 
 his  progenitors,  or  their  conduct,  and  to  punish 
 them  with  fines,  imprisonment,  deprivation,  ex- 
 communication, kc. 
 
 While  Elizabeth  his  sister,  and  progenitor  of 
 our  now  royal  family,  had  above  eighty  thousand 
 of  her  subjects  in  Bohemia  and  Palatinate,  and 
 an  infinity  of  her  allies,  murdered  by  the  Papists 
 in  Germany,  the  zeal  of  Charles  and  his  bishops 
 inflamed  hot  only  against  those  that  appeared 
 most  averse  from  returning  to  Rome.  Certain 
 of  protection  or  an  easy  escape,  the  Papists  here- 
 on became  insolent.  Charles  commanded  the 
 Lords  of  Council,  the  advocates  and  clerks,  to 
 communicate  kneeling,  as  a  pattern  to  others. 
 Finding  none  of  his  own  party  qualified  to  check 
 
106  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 the  increase  of  Popery  at  Paisley,  where  the 
 Earl  of  Abercorn,  and  his  mother  and  brother, 
 impudently  promoted  it.  Law,  archbishop  of 
 Glasgow,  permitted  Mr.  Robert  Boyd  of  Troch- 
 rig  to  be  settled  there.  H»it  he  had  scarcely 
 taken  up  house  there,  when  the  Karl's  brother 
 threw  all  his  books  into  the  street,  as  he  was 
 preachine^  on  the  Lord's  day.  For  this  he  was 
 cited  before  the  council ;  but  as  Mr.  Boyd  in- 
 treated,  that  he  might  not  be  imprisoned,  and 
 as  he  himself  professed  his  sorrow  for  what  he 
 liad  done,  and  his  brother  and  the  magistrates 
 undertook  publicly  to  reinstate  Mr.  Boyd  in  his 
 possession,  the  affair  was  dropped.  But  when 
 Mr.  Boyd,  along  with  the  magistrates,  returned 
 to  take  possession,  they  found  the  doors  bolted  ; 
 nor  could  they  break  them  open,  as  they  were 
 without  their  jurisdiction,  a  mob,  consisting 
 chiefly  of  women,  thought  to  have  been  hounded 
 out  by  the  EarFs  mother,  so  abused  iMr.  Boyd 
 with  revilings  and  throwing  of  dirt,  that  he  was 
 obliged  to  return  to  his  own  house  at  Trochrig 
 in  Carrick.  About  this  time,  several  trafTicking 
 priests  were  apprehended  at  Dundee,  Dumfries, 
 ^c.  but  their  court-favoured  brethren  procured 
 them  all  an  easy  deliverance. 
 
 In  July  1626,  Charles  held  a  convention  of 
 estates  chiefly  for  recovering  into  hh  own  hand 
 the  tithes  and  church  lands,  which  his  lather  had 
 disponed  to  laymen.  While  the  possessors  beg- 
 ged him  to  drop  his  designs,  the  bishops  and 
 their  clerical  favourites  met  in  Edinburgh,  and 
 dispatched  the  hish()|)s  of  Ross  and  Murray,  with 
 AVhiteford  and  Struthers,  to  beseech  him  to  curb 
 the  insolent  Papists,  and  to  perfect  his  revocation 
 of  bis  father's  donations  of  the  church's  property, 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  107 
 
 ^nd  to  promote  the  augmentation  of  ministers' 
 stipends.  Upon  their  return,  the  conforming 
 and  non-conforming  ministers  agreed  to  appoint 
 some,  from  their  respective  presbyteries,  to  con- 
 sult for  the  welfare  of  the  church.  The  archbi- 
 shops absented,  that  they  might  have  it  in  their 
 power  to  declare  the  meeting  null,  if  things  were 
 not  carried  to  their  mind.  This  meeting  agreed 
 to  supplicate  his  majesty,  to  promote  the  fixing 
 of  proper  stipends  on  ministers,  and  the  planting 
 of  vacant  congregations  ;  and  that  the  sentences 
 might  be  taken  off  ministers,  who  had  been  pro- 
 secuted for  non- conformity — and  they  be  allowed 
 to  be  candidates  for,  or  members  of,  the  General 
 Assembly,  if  Presbyteries  please ;  and  that  none 
 might  be  troubled  for  non-conformity,  or  with 
 subscriptions  at  their  admission,  before  such  an 
 Assembly  should  be  held.  The  Conformists  chose 
 the  bishop  of  Ross,  and  the  Non-conformists  Mr. 
 Kobert  Scot  of  Glasgow,  to  present  their  petition. 
 The  archbishops  and  other  diocesans  were  highly 
 offended  with  the  most  of  these  conclusions. 
 Hence  Mr.  Scot  went  not  to  court,  while  the  bi- 
 shop went ;  and  being  charged  with  secret  in- 
 structions from  his  diocesan  brethren,  betray- 
 ed the  cause  of  the  meeting.  Nevertheless,  the 
 Non-conformists  were  charged  with  part  of  his 
 expenses.  Charles  appointed  commissioners  to 
 value  the  tithes:  but  some  barons  procured  a  let- 
 ter from  him,  allowing  the  gentry  an  easy  com- 
 position for  such  as  were  still  in  their  hands. 
 The  commissioners  insisted,  that  such  tithes  as 
 were  in  the  bishops'  hands  ought  also  to  come 
 under  the  revocation^  that  his  majesty  might  have 
 a  part  of  them. — Meanwhile,  a  sudden  inunda- 
 tion of  the  sea,  upon  the  parishes  of  Caerlaverock 
 
108  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THR 
 
 and  Rnthwcll,  in  Cialloway,  alarmed  tlic  surviv- 
 ing iidialutants  and  tJjcir  neighbours,  and  render- 
 ed tlieni  deeply  |)enitent  of  their  sins,  and  con- 
 cerned for  their  eternal  ^alvati^n. 
 
 As  few  of  the  eoninuiiiicants  in  several  chur- 
 ches, in  or  about  Edinburgh,  had  kneeled  at  the 
 sa(  rament  at  Easter  the  preceding-  year,  the  ge- 
 neral session,  wliirh  met  before  it  in  1G28,  beg- 
 ged their  ministers  to  dispense  it  in  the  ancient 
 inannt  r,  for  the  avoiding  of  strife  and  confusion. 
 Some  of  these  were  for  allowing  every  one  to  sit 
 or  kneel  as  he  pleased.  Others  were  for  no  kneel- 
 ing, and  for  the  communicants  dividing  the  ele- 
 ments among  themselves.  The  \on-conformists 
 insisted,  That  they  should  first  celebrate  the  sa- 
 (Tament  in  the  former  manner,  and  then  suppli- 
 cate his  majesty's  tavour,  if  he  were  displeased. 
 But  the  Conformists  got  it  carried,  first  to  sup- 
 plicate his  permission.  In  their  supplication, 
 and  by  Sydserf  their  commissioner,  they  repre- 
 sented, That  few  of  their  people  now  joined  in 
 the  Lord's  supper,  and  few  of  those  that  did, 
 would  receive  it  Icjieeling  :  that  notwithstanding 
 all  their  pains  to  extinguish  it,  the  contention 
 was  still  increasing,  and  had  already  become  in- 
 tolerable ;  that  by  means  of  it,  ministers  in- 
 veighed against,  and  people  hated,  one  another  ; 
 that  atheists  wen*  tempted  to  reckon  the  whole 
 of  religion  an  indilVerent  thing,  which  might  be 
 altered  at  men's  pleasure;  that  kneeling  at  the 
 communion  had  an  apjiearance  of  symbolizing 
 with  Papists,  and  encouraged  them  in  their  ido- 
 latrous worship  of  the  sacramental  bread; — and 
 besought  him  to  dispense  with  their  obedience  to 
 the  act  of  Assembly  and  Parliament  imposing  it. 
 Instead  of  granting  their  rc([uest,  Charles  ap- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  109 
 
 pointed  the  archbishop  of  St.  Andrew's  to  cite 
 them  to  his  tribunal,  and  inflict  such  punishment 
 upon  their  ring-leaders,   as  might  effectually  de- 
 ter others  from  all  such  supplications  for  the  fu- 
 ture ;  and  to  labour  with  all  his  might  to  estab- 
 lish the  form  of  worship  appointed  by  law.  These 
 things  prevented  the  dispensation  of  the  Lord's 
 supper  at  Edinburgh  for  that  season. — Upon  the 
 two  last  Sabbaths  of  May,  and  the  Wednesday 
 betwixt  them,  Charles  appointed  a  solemn  fast 
 to  lament  the  troubled  state   of  the  churches 
 abroad,  and  the  sins  abounding  at  home,  and  to 
 beseech  the  Lord  to  avert  his  threatened  judg- 
 ments, and  succeed  his  Majesty's  arms  against 
 France.    To  these,  some  Non-conformists  added 
 the  innovations  made  upon  the  government  and 
 worship  of  the  church,   and  the  persecution  of 
 faithful  ministers  for  opposing  them  ;   which  fo- 
 mented the  difference  between  the  two  parties. 
 The  Non-conformists  more  and  more  gained  the 
 affections  of  the  people,  while  the  Conformists, 
 losing  their  esteem,    instigated  the  bishops   to 
 persecute  them — who  having  power  on  their  side, 
 threatened  to  excommunicate  all  such  as  should 
 not  speedily  conform.     Being  excluded  from  all 
 the  churches  of  Edinburgh,  Mr.  Robert  Bruce 
 preached  in  several  of  these  in  the  neighbourhood, 
 whether  multitudes  of  the  citizens  resorted  to 
 hear  him.     Informed  of  this,   Charles  required 
 his  privy  council  to  confine  him  to  his  own  house 
 in  Kinnaird,  and  within  two  miles  around  :   but 
 about  the  same  time  required  the  excommunica- 
 tion of  the  Popish   earls  of  Angus,  Nithsdale, 
 Abercorn,  and  their  ladies,  to  be  dispensed  with, 
 and  no  laws  executed  against  them,  till  himself 
 should  come  down  to  Scotland. 
 
110  A  COMPKNDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 While,  about  the  beginninij  of  A.  D.  1629, 
 Dr.  Forbes  of  Abenlet-n,  Wc(lderl)urn  of  St.  An- 
 drew's, and  Maxwc'l  and  Sydserf  of  Edinburgh, 
 occupied  themselves  in  ventinf^  their  Arminiaii 
 tenets,  which  now  paved  the  way  for  preferment, 
 tlie  privy  council,  alarmed  by  repeated  complaints 
 of  the  increase  and  insolence  of  the  Papists,  aj)- 
 peared  more  than  ordinarily  earnest,  in  prosecut- 
 in^'  them,  particularly  if  they  were  excommuni- 
 cated;  and  in  taking  care  of  the  Protestant  edu- 
 cation of  their  children.  Not  to  appear  behind 
 them  in  zeal,  the  conforming  clergy  took  up  a 
 list  of  about  500  gentry  and  others,  and  sent  up 
 INIaxwel  to  London  to  learn  his  iMajesty's  plea- 
 sure concerning  them.  But  Huntley,  through 
 the  queen's  influence,  procured  such  an  order  of 
 soft  dealing  with  them,  as  amounted  to  a  kind 
 of  royal  protection  of  them.  iMeanwhile,  the 
 Presbyterians  were  more  and  more  cruelly  per- 
 secuted, many  of  the  inhabitants  of  Edinburgh, 
 Leith,  and  places  ad  jacent,  being  cited  before  the 
 privy  council  and  High  Commission,  and  arbitra- 
 rily fined,  if  they  did  not  answer  to  satisfaction. 
 IVIessrs.  Lamb  of  Traquair,  D.  Forrest  of  Leith, 
 and  Crcorge  Dunbar  of  Air,  were  deposed  for 
 their  opposition  to  the  course  of  defection.  Ro- 
 bert ISIelvil,  assistant  to  the  aged  minister  of 
 Culross,  having  in  a  sermon,  before  hiiu,  boldly 
 inveighed  against  the  pride  of  Adam  Ballantyne, 
 bishop  of  Dunblane,  and  his  contempt  of  the 
 faithful  ministers  of  Christ,  had  no  doubt  also 
 been  prosecuted,  if  he  could  have  been  deprived 
 of  any  legal  salary.  The  bisho[)s  regarded  the 
 alTronts  which  they  received  from  the  people 
 the  less,  as  his  Majesty  highly  favoured  them 
 •uid  the  Bishop  of  St.  Andrew's  was  ordered  tn 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  Ill 
 
 take  the  precedence  of  the  Chancellor  in  the  pri- 
 vy council,  and  in  places  of  public  resort. 
 
 The  pride  of  the  bishops  having  rendered  them 
 odious  to  a  great  part  of  the  nobility,  a  number 
 of  ministers,  about  the  end  of  this  year,  trans- 
 mitted a  Representation  of  28  grievances  to  his 
 majesty  ;  and  begged,   That  he  would  interpose 
 his  influence  for  the  redress  of  them.     But  per- 
 haps  he  never  deigned  to  read  it.     About  the 
 beginning  of  1630,   Struthers,   a  conformist  mi- 
 nister of  Edinburgh,  offended  by  the  wide  steps 
 some  of  his  brethren  were  taking  towards  Eng- 
 land and  Rome,   and  hearing  that  Maxwel,   his 
 colleague,  had  brought  from  London  an  order  to 
 the  Primate  of  St.  Andrew's,   and  his  diocesan 
 brethren,  to  prepare  matters  for  the  reception  of 
 the  whole  government  and  manner  of  worship 
 used  in  the  English  church,  wrote  a  letter  to  Sir 
 William  Alexander,  now  Earl  of  Airth,  and  the 
 king's  secretary,  in  which  he  represented,  that 
 K.  James,  by  his  commissioner,  had  promised  to 
 the  Parliament  in  1621,  that  no  further  altera- 
 tions should  be  made  in  the  public  worship;  that 
 the  introduction  of  other  rites,  especially  if  with- 
 out the   consent  of   the   church,  would  render 
 the  bishops   still  more  odious ; — would  deprive 
 people  of  their  best  pastors,  alienate  their  affec- 
 tions more   and   more  from  one  another,  and  in 
 the  issue  make  them  either  Papists  or  Atheists. 
 — Meanwhile,   faithful  ministers   were  remark- 
 ably countenanced  of  God  at  their  sacramental 
 and    other    occasions.     Multitudes  crowded    to 
 their  communions  ;  and   being  eager  to  hear  as 
 much  of  the  gospel  as  they  could,  when  they  had 
 an  opportunity  of  it,  they  began  to  have  one  ser- 
 mon upon   Saturday  before,  and  another  on  the 
 
J  12  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OT  THK 
 
 Monday  after.  IMr.  John  I/ivini^ston  a  pioba 
 tioner,  after  liavini^  run  so  far  ofl',  that  mornin::^, 
 preached  a  sermon  at  the  kirk  of  Shots,  on  I\Ion- 
 day  .Iiine  21,  at  which  ^00  were  converted  to 
 Christ,  and  ahnost  every  one  in  his  lar^e  audi- 
 ence remarkably  affected.  This  was  an  evident 
 answer  of  the  prayers  in  which  most  of  the  peo- 
 ple had  spent  the  whole  of  the  preceding-  niixht. 
 Soon  after,  the  prelates'  persecution  of  him  ol)lii;- 
 cd  him  to  flee  to  the  north  of  Ireland  ;  where, 
 for  some  years,  he  and  IMessrs.  Robert  Blair, 
 Robert  Cunint^ham,  James  Hamilton,  George 
 Dunbar,  John  JNI'Lellan,  and  Josias  Welsh,  la- 
 boured with  great  success  in  the  work  of  the 
 Lord.  The  like  divine  influence  attended  the 
 ministrations  of  iNIr.  David  Dickson  at  Irvine 
 and  places  about,  in  the  west  of  Scotland.  To 
 bring  a  reproach  upon  this  work  of  God,  Satan 
 drove  some  into  disagreeable  excesses  and  fren- 
 zies :  but,  by  the  care  of  these  faithful  ministers, 
 his  designs  were  in  a  great  measure  defeated. 
 
 Being  informed  of  an  intended  Convention  of 
 States,  for  imposing  a  new  tax  for  the  supply  of 
 his  Majesty's,  or  his  hungry  courtiers',  necessities, 
 and  for  making  trial,  how  farther  innovations 
 would  relish — but  pretending  to  redress  grievan- 
 ces, the  Nonconform  ministers,  by  the  Karls  of 
 Rothes,  Cassils,  and  Linlithgow,  and  the  Lords 
 Yester,Ross,  Balmerino,  IMelvil,  andLowdon,  and 
 some  well  affected  gentlemen,  presented  a  sup- 
 plication  for  liberty  to  administer  the  Lord's 
 supper  as  pastors  and  people  should  find  most 
 for  edification;  and  that  such  entrants  as  scru- 
 pled, should  not  be  obliged,  before  their  admis- 
 sion to  the  ministry,  to  swear  the  oath  of  si/prc- 
 iiiacii  and  canonical  obedience.    But  the  court  and 
 
 4 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  113 
 
 bishops,  by  their  warm  opposition,  prevented  the 
 readino^of  it.  Balmerino  afterwards  insisted,  that 
 the  oath»  which  was  imposed  without  the  autho- 
 rity of  Parliament,  should  be  laid  aside  ;  and  that 
 according^  to  law,  no  bishops  should  be  allowed 
 to  deprive  or  suspend  any  minister,  without  the 
 trial  and  consent  of  the  ministers  in  that  bounds. 
 But  the  managers  also  smothered  this  motion  in 
 the  birth. 
 
 In  1631,  the  apostacy  still  increased.  Dr.  Max- 
 well taught,  That  our  Saviour  at  his  death  de- 
 scended to  hell,  in  order  to  deliver  from  it  the 
 souls  of  virtuous  heathens;  pretending,  that  this 
 doctrine  tended  much  to  his  glory,  and  to  the 
 comfort  of  Christians.  John  Adamson  of  Liber- 
 ton  taught,  that  the  church  of  Rome  is  a  true 
 church  of  Christ.  Wedderhurn  of  St.  Andrew's 
 and  Sydserf,  without  control,  published  their  Ar- 
 minian  errors:  Many  of  the  conform  clergy,  and 
 especially  the  bishops,  altogether  abandoned 
 themselves  to  drinking  in  taverns,  and  sports  on 
 Sabbath  afternoons.  Foster  of  Melrose,  having 
 but  one  hut  of  corn  in  his  barn  yard,  zealously 
 manifested  his  Christian  freedom,  by  causing  his 
 servants  carry  it  into  his  barn  on  Sabbath.  Not 
 a  few  as  faithfully  bore  witness  against  their  abo- 
 minations— among  whom  we  may  reckon  Messrs. 
 John  Sharp,  who  was  banished  in  1605,  but  on 
 account  of  his  distinguished  learning  recalled, 
 and  made  professor  of  divinity  in  the  new  college 
 of  Edinburgh;  Robert  Bruce,  who  now  died  in  a 
 triumphant  manner,  holding  his  finger  on  the 
 last  verses  of  Rom.  viii ;  Robert  Boyd  of  Troch- 
 rig,  John  Scrimgeor,  John  Chalmers,  John  Dick, 
 William  Scott,  John  Row,  John  Ker,  James  Cur- 
 ry, Ad.  Colt,  David  Foster,  Richard  and  David 
 
 Q 
 
lit  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 Dicksons,  James  Grei^,  John  Ferguson,  James 
 In^lis,  \\'illiarn  I jvin^'-ston,  Tlioinas  Ilo^,  and 
 Alexander  Henderson,  wlio  had  been  eon  verted 
 from  Prelacy  by  a  note  of  Mr  Bruce;  Samuel 
 Rutherford,  who,  like  some  others,  had  ^ot  into 
 the  ministry,  without  any  sinful  enicai^ement,  by 
 means  of  some  of  the  nobility — Robert  l)oui;las, 
 (leorge  (iillespy,  a  preacher,  and  others. 
 
 Nuthintrof  importance  relative  to  the  church 
 happened  in  1G.'32.  But  next  year,  Charles,  at- 
 tended by  ])ishop  Laud  and  many  others,  came 
 down  to  Edinburgh,  in  order  to  be  crowned,  and 
 to  abolish  the  remains  of  Presbytery,  and  perfect 
 the  relicfious  conformity  of  the  two  nations.  Af- 
 ter beint;  crowned  in  t!ie  most  splendid  and  cere- 
 monious manner,  he,  on  next  Sabbath,  was  gra- 
 tified with  the  I^nglish  mode  of  worship,  and 
 with  the  most  fulsome  flattery  from  the  pulpit, 
 and  the  most  insolent  railing  against  such  as 
 scrupled  at  lioly  vestments,  or  any  thing  else, 
 which  he  pleased  to  a])j)oint  in  the  worship  of 
 God.  The  afternoon  was  spent  in  extravagant 
 feasting,  attended  with  concerts  of  music,  sound- 
 ing of"  trumj)ets,  and  the  like  profane,  carnal  j)a- 
 rade.  The  Parliament  having  met,  asserted  his 
 supremacy  over  the  church  in  all  causes,  and  his 
 power  of  prescribing  proper  vestments  f(jr  clergy- 
 men, the  last  of  which  it  seems  his  father  had 
 never  executed.  They  ratified  all  former  acts  in 
 favours  of  the  religion  presently  professed,  that 
 is,  as  they  had  dressed  it  up  with  Kj»iseoj)acy  and 
 superstition.  Hence  the  fait  hi  ul  party  o|)posed 
 their  ratification.  They  ratified  his  revocation 
 of  his  progenitor's  grants  of  tithes  and  church 
 lands.  The  faithful  ministers  delivered  to  Sir 
 John  Hay,  elerk  register,  under  the  form  of  pro- 
 
CHURCH  OF  Scotland;  116 
 
 testation,  a  petion  for  redress  of  grievances,  crav- 
 ing. That  as  the  commissioners  from  the  church 
 had  transgressed  the  caveats,  they  might  be  sus- 
 pended from  voting  in  parliament,  till  they  were 
 heard  ae^ainst  them  on  that  point;  that  the  alte- 
 rations in  the  act  of  Parliament  1612,  from  that 
 of  the  assembly  1610,   might  be  rectified;   that 
 the  act  1592,  establishing  Sessions,  Presbyteries, 
 Synods,  and  General  Assemblies,  might  be  revis- 
 ed and  ratified ;  that,  as  was  promised  when  they 
 were  introduced,    none  should  be  urged  to  ob- 
 serve the  articles  of  Perth;  and  that  all  imposi- 
 tion of  oaths  not  appointed  by  the  Assembly  or 
 Parliament  on  Intrants,  l>e  prohibited.    Sir  John, 
 being  a  sworn  enemy  to  religion,   and  a  slave  to 
 the  bishops,   was  highly  offended  with  the  peti- 
 tion, and  especially  with  Mr.  Hog's  solemn  man- 
 ner of  delivering  it.    The  same  ministers,  by  Mr. 
 Hog,  transmitted  another  supplication  to  Charles 
 himself,  who  lodged  at  Dalkeith,  beseeching  him 
 to  favour  their  forementioned  petition  in  the  Par- 
 liament.   But  he,  detesting  their  honest  designs, 
 got  both  their  petitions  smothered  in  the  birth. 
 Instigated  by   the   ministers,    a  number  of  the 
 lords,   barons,  and  burgesses,   presented  to  the 
 king  and  Parliament  a  petition,  craving.  That 
 the  novations  lately  introduced  into  the  church, 
 should  be  abolished;  that  such  as  had  no  interest 
 in  the  happiness  of  the  kingdom,  or  had  been  de- 
 clared incapable  of  being  judges  in   any  court, 
 should  be  debarred  from  seats  in  the  Parliament. 
 Charles  heartily  abhorred  their  requests.      Ne- 
 vertheless, he  had  no  small  difficulty  to  carry  the 
 ratification  of  his  spiritual  supremacy,  and  of  the 
 hierarchy  and   superstition  which  his  father  had 
 introduced.    Notwithstanding  all  his  solicitations 
 
lie  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 and  threatenings,  and  even  calling  for  a  pen  to 
 mark  their  names  that  served  or  opposed  him, 
 JlJU'cn  carls  and  lords,  witli  furiif-j'uur  commis- 
 sioners from  burghs,  voted  against  that  act.  Bi- 
 shop Ikirnet  aflirms,  that  it  was  really  carried  in 
 the  negative.  Hut  Hay,  tiic  register,  who  collect- 
 ed thevotcs,  affirming  that  it  was  carried  in  theaf- 
 firmative,  the  Earl  of  Rothes,  who  had  opposed  it 
 with  great  freedom  and  strength  of  reasoning, 
 averred  the  contrary.  Charles,  meanly  interpos- 
 ing, told  Rothes,  that  the  clerk's  declaration  must 
 stand,  unless  he,  at  the  hazard  of  losing  his  head, 
 would  prove  him  guilty  of  falsifying  the  records 
 of  Parliament.  Knowing  that  Charles,  instigat- 
 ed by  his  bishops,  would  rain  down  his  vengeance 
 upon  them,  as  soon  as  he  could  get  an  opportu- 
 nity, the  nobles  prepared  a  representation  of  their 
 designs  and  reasons  thereof.  Rut  either  their 
 want  of  unanimity  among  themselves;  or  their 
 information  ot  his  intention  to  refuse  to  hear  it ; 
 or  his  sudden  departure  to  London,  prevented 
 their  |)resenting  it  to  iiim. 
 
 Having  returned  home,  and  made  Laud,  his 
 faithful  attendant,  archbishop  of  Canterbury,  he 
 transmitted  an  order  to  Ballantyne,  bishop  of 
 ]>umblane,  and  dean  of  his  royal  chapel  at  Edin- 
 burgh, to  take  care  to  have  the  communion  there 
 received  on  their  knees,  and  in  cups  consecrated 
 to  the  king's  use,  on  the  first  Sabbath  of  every 
 month,  and  to  cause  all  the  lords  of  privy  coun- 
 cil and  session,  advocates,  clerks,  and  writers  to 
 the  signet  to  receive  it  in  Ci\.w  form,  at  least  once 
 eveiy  year,  as  a  pattern  to  others ;  and  to  report 
 their  obedience  or  disobedience  in  this  matter  to 
 him.  Nevertheless,  it  is  said,  that  no  more  than 
 six  lords  of  privy  council,  seven  of  session,  two 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  117 
 
 advocates,  one  writer  to  the  signet,  with  the  clerk 
 of  the  bills,  and  two  young  lords,  conformed  to 
 this  order. 
 
 While  Charles  had  been  in  Scotland,  he  had 
 erected  a  new  bishoprick  at  Edinburgh,  and  no- 
 minated William  Forbes,  a  minister  of  the  city, 
 zealous  for  the  reconcilement  of  the  popish  and 
 protestant  religions,  to  it.  After  a  farce  of  elec- 
 tion by  the  chapter,  he  was  solemnly  consecrated, 
 in  January,  J  634,  in  the  presence  of  the  two 
 archbishops  and  five  bishops ;  and  had  the  little 
 and  g7'eat  kirks  united  to  form  his  cathedral. 
 Notwithstanding  his  monkish  temper,  he  imme- 
 diately dispersed  his  mandates,  requiring  all  mi- 
 nisters in  his  diocese,  within  fourteen  days,  to 
 subscribe  an  engagement  to  full  conformity,  and 
 to  administrate  the  sacraments  to  none  but  those 
 of  their  own  congregations,  under  pain  of  being 
 punished  as  schismatics.  Most  of  the  Presbytery 
 of  Edinburgh  subscribed  the  engagement,  on  the 
 same  day  that  they  received  his  mandate.  Four 
 of  them  took  it  to  an  advisement.  But  William 
 Arthur  at  Westkirk,  and  James  Thomson  at  Col- 
 lington,  flatly  refused  their  subscription.  Other 
 Presbyteries  were  much  less  complaisant.  Some 
 expressly  refused  to  come  under  any  such  en- 
 gagement. The  Presbytery  of  Greenlaw  trans- 
 mitted to  him  their  reasons  against  compliance, 
 and  warned  him,  that  the  wrath  of  God  would 
 certainly  overtake  him,  if  he  persisted  in  requir- 
 ing ministers  to  act  contrary  to  their  conscience. 
 He  had  scarcely  threatened  to  make  the  best  in 
 Edinburgh  kneel  at  the  communion,  or  lose  his 
 Episcopal  gown,  when  a  vomiting  of  blood  put 
 an  end  to  his  violent  measures,  about  two  months 
 after  his  instalment.    To  obtain  his  fat  benefice, 
 
118  A  COMPRNDIOCS  HISTORY  OF  TIIK 
 
 Syclserf  laboured  to  imitate  him  in  Arminianism, 
 and  in  approaches  towards  Popery,  liut  Charles, 
 knowin;,^  him  to  he  much  hated  in  lulinhurgh, 
 transported  Dr.  Lindsay  from  Brechin,  and  placed 
 Sydserf  in  his  room. 
 
 A  rude  drau«^ht  of  tlie  intended  address  of  the 
 nobles  to  his  majesty,  at  the  conchision  of  the 
 above  mentioned  Parliament,  having  been  left  in 
 the  handsof  Babnerino,  one  Dunmuir  awriter,who 
 had  been  allowed  to  view  Ins  library,  clandestinely 
 took  a  coj)y  of  it,  which  lie  inadvertently  shewed 
 to  Hay  of  Nau^hton,  who  took  a  copy  of  it  w  bile 
 he  slejit,  and  transmitted  it  to  Archbishop  Spots- 
 wood.  He,  as  usual,  posted  off  with  it  on  the  Lord's 
 day  to  London  ;  and  represented  to  Charles, 
 That  it  amounted  to  lease-making  against  him 
 and  his  government  ;  and  that  copies  of  it  were 
 industriously  spread  by  the  noblemen  concerned 
 in  it,  in  order  to  alienate  his  subjects,  and  make 
 ministers  to  refuse  the  vestments,  and  other  rites 
 prescribed  by  law.  At  last,  he  and  his  fellow  bi- 
 shops procured  a  commission  for  some  ignorant, 
 mercenary,  or  Pojiish  creatures  of  the  court,  to 
 try  the  authors  and  favourers  of  it,  as  guilty  of 
 treason.  Ilaig,  the  advocate,  who  had  draw^n  it, 
 after  writing  a  letter  to  Balmerino,  bearing  that 
 he  had  written  it  without  any  iielp  or  direction 
 from  him,  fled  off.  After  some  months  imprison- 
 ment Balmerino  was  brought  to  his  trial.  Not- 
 withstanding all  that  the  bishops  could  do,  seven 
 of  the  jury  brought  him  \\\  not  ii;uilty.  Traquair, 
 to  please  them,  gave  his  casting  vote  against  him. 
 But  finding,  that  the  subjects  were  fully  deter- 
 mined either  to  liberate  him,  or  to  revenge  his 
 death  upon  those  that  had  condemned  him,  with- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  119 
 
 out  any  shadow  of  ground,  he  quickly  procured 
 for  him  a  royal  remission. 
 
 In  1685,  death  had  scarcely  transported  the 
 pious  Viscount  of  Kenmure,  and  five  or  six  of  the 
 faithful  ministers  of  their  heavenly  thrones,  when 
 Archhishop  Spotswood  was  made  chancellor  of 
 Scotland,  Ballantyne  transported  to  Aberdeen, 
 and  Sydserf  to  Galloway,  and  Wedderburn  made 
 bishop  of  Dunblane,  and  Whiteford  of  Brechin. 
 Some  ministers  of  every  presbytery  were  made 
 Justices  of  peace;  but  few,  except  thorough  paced 
 episcopalians,  accepted  of  that  office.  It  was  in- 
 tended to  provide  ministers  for  all  the  abbacies, 
 in  order  to  have  as  many  ecclesiastical  lords  to 
 vote  in  Parliament.  But  the  nobility  opposed 
 this  motion  ;  and  Traquair  persuaded  Charles, 
 that  it  would  be  for  his  advantage  to  keep  the 
 abbacies  in  his  own  hand.  To  pacify  the  morti- 
 fied bishops,  a  royal  patent  was  issued,  empower- 
 ing every  one  of  them,  with  any  six  associates 
 that  he  pleased,  to  judge  all  persons  within  their 
 diocese,  in  the  manner  of  the  high  commission. 
 Without  delay  they  improved  this  power  for  the 
 destruction  of  their  opponents.  For  imposing  an 
 intrusion  on  his  parish,  Alexander  Gordon  of 
 Earlstown  was  cited  before  Sydserf  and  his  Gal- 
 loway commission;  fined  for  absence,  and  banish- 
 ed to  Montrose.  For  refusing  to  conform, or  to  con- 
 sent to  the  intrusion  of  a  conformist  on  his  charge, 
 Mr.  Glendoning  of  Kirkcubright,  aged  seventy- 
 nine,  was  confined  to  his  parish.  Wm.  Dalgleish, 
 a  neighbouring  minister,  was  confined  in  like 
 manner.  For  continuing  to  hear  Mr.  Glendon- 
 ing, the  magistrates  of  Kirkcudbright  were  con- 
 fined at  Wigton  ;  and  his  own  son,  being  one  of 
 them,  imprisoned,  because  he  would  not  incarce- 
 
 ii 
 
120  A   COMPHNDIOUS    HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 rate  his  father.  Mr.  William  Livinj^ston  of  F.a- 
 nark  was  prosecuted  by  the  archhi^iiop  of  Glas- 
 gow for  eniployini;  his  son  .loiiu  to  preach,  who, 
 alonij:  with  his  brethren,  had  been  lately  silenced 
 by  the  bisiiops  of  Ireland  :  but  the  old  man  so 
 boldly  vindicated  his  coiuluct,  and  laid  home  to 
 the  consciences  of  liis  judt;es  their  many  heinous 
 offenres  aj^ainst  (jod,  that  they  were  ^Had  to  be 
 rid  of  him.  Walter  (Treii^s  who  had  enter(Hi  to 
 Balmerino  with  Spotswood's  own  consent,  and 
 by  the  call  of  both  patron  and  people,  was  cast 
 out  as  an  intruder,  that  wanted  collation  from 
 him.  John  IMein,  merchant  in  Edinburgh,  was 
 again  prosecuted  for  not  observing  an  anniversary 
 fast,  and  attending  his  own  [)arish  church.  The 
 members  of  the  college  of  justice  and  people  of 
 Edinburgh,  were  mightily  urged  to  perfect  con- 
 formity, in  all  the  novations  introduced  'J'hus 
 the  bishops  carried  all  before  them,  leaving  little 
 else  for  the  friends  of  reformation,  but  to  cry  to 
 the  Lord  because  of  their  oppressors. 
 
 In  the  beginning  of  \(jS6t  IMaxwell  bishop  of 
 Ross,  \\\\[^  was  already  a  lord  of  the  privy  coun- 
 cil, a  lord  of  the  excluHpui,  and  an  extraordinary 
 lord  of  the  session,  thought  to  have  got  the  high 
 treasurcrship,  which  Morton  demitted.  But  the 
 nobles,  otfended  with  Si)otswoo(rs  promotion  to 
 the  chancellorship,  procured  that  office  for  the 
 Earl  of  Tra(piair,  who  often  proved  a  thorn  in 
 the  side  of  the  bishops.  Traipiair's  j)rocuring 
 a  pension  of  .-0  200  Sterling  for  Maxwell,  si- 
 lenced him  a  little.  Hut  when  he  s(>licited  the 
 dissolution  of  the  commission  for  valuation  of 
 tithes,  'IVacpiair,  by  gaining  not  only  the  nobles, 
 but  even  part  of  tlie  bish.)ps  to  the  opposition, 
 prevented  his  success.     S])otswood  durst  nut  ap- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  121 
 
 pear  against  Traquair,  for  fear  he  should  detect 
 his  villanies.  The  archbishop  of  Glasgow  had 
 obtained  a  royal  grant  of  the  first  fruits  in  his 
 diocese ;  but  Traquair  found  means  to  pocket 
 them  himself.  He  also  thought  to  oblige  the  in- 
 habitants of  Glasgow  to  pay  their  ministers  sti- 
 pends, and  to  deprive  their  council  of  the  Patro- 
 nage of  Blackfriars  and  the  Loxv-kirks;  but  Tra- 
 quair defeated  his  plan. 
 
 In  1 630,  Mr.  Samuel  Rutherford  had  been  cit- 
 ed before  the  high  commission ;  but  a  storm  hin- 
 dering Spotswood  to  cross  the  Forth,  and  Alex- 
 ander Colvil,  one  of  the  Judges,  befriending  him, 
 the  diet  was  deserted.  Some  ministers  in  his 
 presbytery,  labouring  to  exasperate  Spotswood 
 against  him,  a  new  prosecution  of  him  and  Mr. 
 Dalgleish  was  intended  in  1634.  But  Lord  Kirk- 
 cudbright screened  Rutherford  from  his  persecu- 
 tors' rage.  In  1636,  he  was  obliged  by  Sydserf, 
 to  appear  before  the  high  commission  for  his  non- 
 conformity, and  his  preaching  against  the  Articles 
 ofPerthf  and  writing  against  Arminians.  He  de- 
 clined their  jurisdiction  as  unlawful  and  incom- 
 petent :  nor  would  he  give  any  of  the  bishops  pre- 
 sent their  lordly  titles.  Notwithstanding  all  that 
 Lord  Lorn  and  others  could  do  in  his  behalf,  he 
 was  prohibited,  under  pain  of  rebellion,  to  exer- 
 cise his  ministry  any  more  in  Scotland,  and  char- 
 ged to  confine  himself  in  Aberdeen  and  its  envi- 
 rons, during  his  Majesty's  pleasure.  In  that  con- 
 finement he  wrote  many  of  his  letters,  which  have 
 since  been  so  refreshing  to  multitudes.  Mr.  Da- 
 vid Dixon,  whom  the  Earl  of  Eglinton  had  got 
 restored  to  his  charge,  was  on  the  point  of  being 
 deposed  by  the  archbishop  of  Glasgow,  for  employ- 
 ing Messrs.  Blair,  Livingston  and  others,  whom 
 
 R 
 
122         A  coMPr.NDiur^  iiistoky  uj   the 
 
 the  episrojial  persecutors  had   driven  from  Ire- 
 land. 
 
 \h'  this  time  Laud  of  Canterbury  was  deeply 
 concerned  to  have  a  perfect  conformity  establised 
 between  the  Scottish  and  Kni^^lish  ( luirclies.  Ho 
 laboured  to  persuade  the  Scottish  bishops  to  re- 
 ceive the  Env:Hsli  I'dnrgij.  But,  in  their  ])ride, 
 and  to  avoid  all  appearance  of  their  dejiendence 
 on  England,  they  insisted  for  a  liturgy  of  their 
 own  composition,  but  near  to  the  English  in  both 
 matter  and  form.  U'his  occasioned  a  dryness  be- 
 tween them  and  the  Canterburian  primate.  But 
 Charles,  advised  by  Laud  and  his  underling  bi- 
 shops of  London  and  Norwich,  took  the  matter 
 upon  himself.  lie  fixed  upon  the  alterations 
 which  he  thought  proper,  and  required  the  Scot- 
 tish bishops  to  frame  their  service  book  according 
 to  them,  and  particularly  to  retain  all  the  Eng- 
 lish Sai/its  (Jdj/Sf  and  add  the  most  renowned  of 
 Scotland  to  them,  especially  those  of  the  royal 
 family  or  episcopal  order,  and  by  no  means  to 
 omit  Sai?iU  Geofgc  and  Patrick — and  to  retain  the 
 phrase,  receive  ye  the  Holij  Ghost,  in  the  Rubric, 
 for  ordination  ; — and  to  insert  among  the  lessons 
 ordinarily  read,  ^\'i<dom  of  Solomon,  i,  ii,  iii, 
 iv,  V,  vi.  and  Ecclesiasticus  i,  ii,  v,  viii,  x, 
 XXV,  xlix.  And  he  further  required,  that  in  all 
 bishops  houses,  universities,  and  colleges,  this 
 service  book  should  be  used  twice  every  day. 
 
 While  Maxwell,  Sydserf,  Wedderburn,  Ballan- 
 tyne,  and  other  bishops  were  forming  this  liturgy, 
 it  was  foreseen,  that  a  booli  of  canons  would  be 
 necessary  to  enforce  the  use  of  it.  Charles  there- 
 fore authorized  them  to  conqiose  one,  falsely  pie- 
 tending,  That  the  sul)Stanee    of  the  acts  of  the 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLANn.  123 
 
 General  Assemblies  could  not  otherwise  be  pro- 
 perly known,  as  a  fixed  standard  of  manas^ement. 
 Scarcely  had  the  canons  been  published,  when 
 the  whole  body  of  Presbyterians  declared  ag-ainst 
 them,  as  obscure  and  corrupt  in  many  things  ; 
 an^t  as  irregularly  imposed.  They  particular- 
 ly complained,  That  the  1st,  12th,  and  13th 
 canons,  advanced  the  king's  prerog-ative  too  hig"h, 
 and  left  the  church  entirely  at  his  mercy ;  that 
 the  2d,  5th,  and  15th,  urged  an  implicit  subscri})- 
 tion  to  a  service  book  or  liturgy  not  yet  finished 
 and  published;  that  the  6th  rendered  ministers 
 in  part  slaves  to  the  bishops  ;  that  the  10th  laid 
 the  innocent  and  guilty  parties  on  a  level  in  the 
 case  of  divorce;  that  the  16th  seemed  to  bind  to 
 the  bidding  of  prayer,  prescribed  in  the  55th. 
 Against  the  rest  they  complained,  that  bishops 
 were  established  with  absolute  jurisdiction,  and 
 Popish  idolatry  and  superstition  revived  by  them; 
 that  the  whole  structure  of  their  ancient  and  so 
 often  ratified  church  policy  was  abolished;  sessions 
 and  Presbyteries  condemned  as  conventicles  ;  rul- 
 ing elders  and  deacons  rejected ;  and  all  ecclesi- 
 astical causes  dragged  to  episcopal  tribunals  ; — 
 that  they  contained  a  number  of  Popish  terms,  as 
 sacramental  confession,  and  absolution — appointed 
 all  ranks  to  come  to  the  Lord's  Supper  and  all 
 other  sacraments ;  or  contained  ambiguous  terms, 
 as  that  ministers  are  ordained  to  urge  the  neces- 
 sitij  of  good  w^orks.  The  liturgy  or  book  of  com- 
 mon prayer,  was  at  last  finished.  It  did  not  con- 
 tain so  many  lessons  from  the  Apocrypha  as  the 
 English  ;  but  those  which  it  had  w^ere  appointed 
 to  be  read  when  the  audience  was  like  to  be  most 
 numerous.  The  Psalms  of  it  were  not  taken  from 
 the  Vulgate,  but  from  the  last  English  translation. 
 
121<         A  (:(jMrKM)iuiJs  niiroiiY  oi  the 
 
 Bui,  in  many  thin^^s  relative  to  altars,  offering  of 
 the  elements  in  the  comnnmion,  prayer  for  the 
 dead,  ministers  standini;  at  the  altar,  and  some- 
 times turninc^  their  face  from  the  people,  and  with 
 respect  to  Ciirist's  corporeal  presence  in  the  Eu- 
 charist, it  aj)proached  nearer  to  the  Romish  mass 
 book  than  the  English  had  done. — It  was  more- 
 over loudly  complained,  that  these  books  were 
 imposed  without  being  first  examined  and  ap- 
 proved by  any  General  Assembly  ;  and  that  the 
 ^:anons,  under  pain  of  excommunication,  prohibit- 
 ed all  ([uestioning  of  the  rectitude  of  any  thing 
 in  them. 
 
 ^\'hen  Charles  and  his  privy  council  issued 
 forth  their  proclamation  for  the  observance  of 
 these  books,  some  insisted  for  a  delay  of  the  ex- 
 ecution. But  the  young  bishops,  who  had  fram- 
 ed them,  and  Tracpiair,  who,  to  ruin  them,  push- 
 ed them  forward,  zealously  insisted  for  immediate 
 obedience  to  the  royal  mandate,  and  the  new 
 laws.  Notwithstanding  the  ministers  were  ur- 
 ged to  compliance  in  their  diocesan  Synods,  ma- 
 ny of  them  would  not  so  much  as  purchase  the 
 books.  The  bishops  falsely  rej)resented  to  the 
 council,  that  the  most  judicious  ministers  had  all 
 dutifully  complied,  and  obtained  an  act  for  rais- 
 ing/r//(/'.9  o/V/or// /;/£,'- against  the  reluctants,  oblig- 
 ing each  of  them  to  provide  two  copies  of  the 
 service  hook  for  the  use  of  the  parish,  within  fif- 
 teen days  after  their  charge,  under  pain  of  being 
 held  rebels  against  his  Majesty  and  his  laws. 
 But  this  act  was  only  a  temporary  bugbear, 
 '/eal  for  the  increase  of  tiieir  revenues  somewhat 
 diverted  the  attention  of  the  two  archbishojis. 
 Spotswood  hoped  to  draw  the  tithes  and  abbey 
 of  St.  Andrew's  to  himself;   and  by  obtaining  a 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  125 
 
 locality  in  each  parish,  to  enrich  himself,  and  im- 
 poverish the  family  of  Lennox,  which  had  grant- 
 ed leases  of  the  tithes.  His  brother  of  Glasgow 
 expected  to  get  £  5000  Sterling  out  of  the 
 annuities  within  his  diocese.  But,  by  procuring 
 a  royal  dissolution  of  the  commission  for  valua- 
 tion of  tithes,  and  by  other  methods,  Traquair, 
 to  their  unspeakable  vexation,  defeated  their  de- 
 signs. They  resolved  on  a  journey  to  court,  to 
 complain  of  his  conduct,  and  to  procure  redress 
 to  their  purse.  And  in  order  to  secure  themselves 
 a  favourable  hearing,  they  laboured  zealously  to 
 promote  the  use  of  the  new  liturgy  before  they 
 set  out.  They  procured  a  letter  from  Charles, 
 and  an  order  from  his  privy  council,  requiring  his 
 subjects  in  Edinburgh  to  use  it  as  a  pattern  to  the 
 rest.  Spotswood  then  convened  the  ministers, 
 and  threatened  them  with  immediate  suspension, 
 if  they  should  disobey.  It  seems  that  all  of  them 
 promised  compliance,  except  Messrs.  Andrew 
 Ramsay  and  Henry  Rollock ;  the  immediate  sus- 
 pension of  whom  did  but  so  awaken  the  indigna- 
 tion of  the  people,  that  they  would  not  allow  the 
 rest  to  comply,  however  willing  they  wq^yq,  to 
 do  it. 
 
 Dean  Annan  had  scarce  began  to  read  the  ser- 
 vice in  St.  Giles'  church,  when  the  people  began 
 to  make  a  noise.  Bishop  Lindsay  hastened  to  the 
 pulpit  to  pacify  them ;  but  by  casting  of  stools 
 and  the  like  at  them,  both  bishop  and  dean  were 
 in  danger  of  their  life.  Almost  all  the  sober 
 people  went  home,  bitterly  reflecting  upon  the 
 bishops,  for  bringing  matters  to  such  a  j)ass,  by 
 their  innovations.  The  magistrates  and  privy 
 counsellors,  having  driven  from  the  church  such 
 as  aimed  their  blows  at  the  bishop  and  dean,  the 
 
]2(')  A    flO.Ml'LNDlUL'S    IIJS'IOUY   OF    irfF. 
 
 service  was  gut  peiruniud  u  illi  shut  doors.  Ijiit 
 Annan,  and  especially  the  bishop,  was  in  no  small 
 dani^er  as  they  went  home.  Fairlic,  bishop  of 
 Argyle,  anel  his  assistants,  who  attempted  to  in- 
 troduce the  liturgy  into  the  Greyf'riars  chueh, 
 had  not  much  better  encouragement.  I  do  not 
 find  that  it  was  attemi)ted  in  any  other  churches 
 of  the  city.  Not  a  single  person,  except  the  mere 
 rab])le,  appears  to  have  been  concerned  in  these 
 tumults.  I)ut  the  bishops  and  their  votaries,  to 
 the  great  grief  of  the  privy  council,  inv  diately 
 sent  off'  an  express  to  his  Alajesty,  in  which  they 
 represented  the  citizens  as  the  authors  or  actors 
 of  all ;  and  complained  of  the  absence  of  Tra- 
 quair,  who  had  been  detained  by  a  heavy  rain. 
 After  the  privy  council  had  made  a  thorough  ex- 
 amination, Tracjuair,  in  their  name,  informed 
 Charles,  that  the  whole  tumult  was  owing  to  the 
 low  rabble,  especially  the  most  abject.  And,  in 
 a  letter  to  the  iNIarquis  of  Hamilton,  he  laid  the 
 blame  upon  the  folly  and  precipitancy  of  the  bi- 
 shops. The  town  council  of  Edinburgh  wrote  a 
 letter  to  archbishop  Laud,  representing  the  inno- 
 cence of  their  citizens,  and  their  own  readiness 
 to  receive  the  liturgy  ;  and  they  offered  an  addi- 
 tional stipend  to  such  ministers  as  would  use  it ; 
 and  promised  to  them  and  their  assistants  [)rotec- 
 tion  in  so  doing,  liut  as  none  of  the  contorming 
 clergy  inclined  to  venture  their  heads  on  such 
 terms,  the  bishops  agreed  to  suspend  the  service 
 till  his  ^lajesty's  [)leasure  concerning  the  late  tu- 
 mult should  be  known.  All  sacred  meetings  on 
 week  days  were  dropt  in  the  city,  which,  having 
 an  ap[)earance  of  a  Popish  interdiction,  inflamed 
 the  people  more  and  more.  As  both  ministers 
 and  magistrates  desired  to  promote  the  service  , 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  1*21 
 
 and  the  ministers  oflered  to  read  it  themselves 
 till  decent  readers  could  be  found  and  instruct- 
 ed, providing"  that  the  ministers  in  the  suburbs 
 and  neighbourhood,  should  be  obliged  to  do 
 the  same,  and  that  the  city  should  give  assurance 
 for  their  indemnification,  the  privy  council  or- 
 dered a  bond  of  assurance  to  be  drawn  up,  and 
 expeded,  and  appointed  the  magistrates  to  make 
 diligent  search  after  the  authors  and  abettors  of 
 the  late  tumult,  and  to  provide  readers  for  their 
 churches.  But  notwithstanding  all  their  diligence, 
 sufficient  readers  could  not  be  had :  and  so  the 
 service  was  delayed,  to  the  great  mortification  of 
 Charles  and  his  bishops. 
 
 Meanwhile,  the  two  archbishops  had  done 
 what  they  could,  to  promote  the  sei^vlce  in  the 
 country,  and  had  charged  Messrs.  Alexander 
 Henderson  of  Leuchars,  and  David  Dickson  of 
 Irvine,  and  many  others,  under  pain  of  being  im- 
 mediately denounced  rebels,  to  buy,  each  of  them, 
 two  copies  of  the  prayer  book  for  the  use  of  their 
 parishes.  Nevertheless,  not  only  were  readers 
 every  where  hard  to  be  found,  but  the  reluctant 
 ministers,  in  four  different  petitions,  begged  the 
 privy  council  to  grant  a  suspension  of  the  JDishops' 
 orders — in  which  they  pointed  forth  the  principal 
 errors  of  the  Canons  and  Liturgy,  and  offered  a 
 friendly  dispute  on  these  points  ; — they  shewed 
 what  bad  consequences  had,  or  might  attend 
 the  introduction  of  novations  and  imposition  of 
 liturgies;  and  that  the  church  had  no  security  at 
 all,  if  princes  might  change  her  ancient  and  inno- 
 cent forms  of  worship  without  her  consent ;  and 
 that  his  Majesty  had  bound  himself  to  make  no 
 alterations  in  this  kingdom,  without  the  lawful 
 advice  and  cojisent  of  all  concerned.  Many  no-- 
 5 
 
I'JS  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY   OF  THE 
 
 blemcn,  by  their  letters,  and  gentlemen,  by  per- 
 sonal solicitation,  be^^r^anl  the  privy  counsellors  to 
 keep  that  yoke  otr  the  neck  of  ministers.  The 
 council  therefore  enacted,  'J'hat  letters  of  horning 
 relative  to  the  service  book,  should  extend  no 
 further  than  to  the  purchasing  of  it.  They  re- 
 presented to  his  Majesty,  that  notwithstanding 
 all  their  endeavours  to  the  contrary,  the  increas- 
 ing opposition  to  his  new  liturgy  had  baflled  all 
 their  attempts  to  introduce  it ;  and  begged  that 
 some  of  their  number  might  be  called  up  to  give 
 him  full  information  of  the  critical  state  of  the 
 nation,  in  order  that  proper  steps  might  be  taken 
 to  hush  the  commotions,  and  introduce  his  litur- 
 gy. The  supplicants  thanked  them  for  their  mo- 
 deration ;  but  tiie  bishops  were  highly  dissatisfi- 
 ed, as,  contrary  to  their  intention,  the  odium  of 
 the  imposition,  being  removed  from  the  council, 
 fell  all  on  themselves. 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  129 
 
 CHAPTER   V. 
 
 By  bold  and  pi'iident  Remonstrances — by  solemnly  re~ 
 new'ing  their  Covenant  with  God — by  ivarlike  Defence 
 of  themselves  against  Charles  I.  and  Mcnitrose  his 
 Lieutenant — by  entering  into  a  Covenant  with,  and  as- 
 sisting the  English — by  opposing  Hamilton'' s  Engager- 
 ment — by  adopting  neiv  Standards  of  Doctrine^  Wor~ 
 ship.  Discipline,  and  Government,  and  by  many  exceL 
 lent  Acts  of  Asserably  and  Parliament,  the  Covenan- 
 ters carry  their  Reformation  to  great  Perfection,  be- 
 tween 1637  and  1651. 
 
 JjuRiNG  the  throng  and  hard  labour  of  the  har- 
 vest, the  country  was  pretty  quiet.  But  it  was 
 scarcely  finished,  when,  instead  of  a  few  consci- 
 entious ministers,  no  less  than  twenty  noblemen, 
 a  considerable  number  of  barons,  mostly  ruling 
 elders,  and  near  an  hundred  ministers,  the  pro- 
 vosts, or  eldest  bailies,  of  Glasgow,  Stirling,  Ayr, 
 Irvine,  Dumbarton,  Dunfermline,  Culross,  Kirk- 
 caldy, Dysart,  Cupar,  Lanark,  Inverkeithing, 
 Burntisland,  and  Anstruther,  with  commissioners 
 from  sixty  eight  parishes,  mostly  gentlemen  of 
 principal  influence  in  the  counties  of  Ayr,  Fife, 
 Lothian, Clydsdale,  Stirling, and  Strathearn,  many 
 of  whom  knew  not  of  others,  till  they  met  at  the 
 
 s 
 
130  A  COMHENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 door  of  tlie  ( nuncil  house,  remonstrated  against 
 the  imposition  of  the  service  book — In  Charles's 
 reply  to  his  coiinrirs  letter,    he  eomplained  that 
 they  had  not  exenited  his  (ormer  direetions;  that 
 they  had  proposed  no  new  expedient,  but  had  al- 
 lowed an   interruption  of  the  service.      lie   per- 
 cioptoril)  ordered   them,   hy  their  presence   and 
 influence,  to  cause  it   to   he  estahlished  in  Edin- 
 bur^^h  without  further  d  lay;  and  that  the  other 
 bish()j)s  should  introduce  it  into  their  dioceses,  as 
 had  been  done  in    those  of   Ross  and  Dum!)lane  ; 
 and  that  the  council   should  warn  all  the  burc^hs 
 to  choose  none  for  their  ma^^istrates,   for  whose 
 conformity  they  could   not  answer.      Neverthe- 
 less sixty-eight  different  remonstrances   against 
 the  introduction  of  the  service  hook,  were  present- 
 ed to  the  council,   representing  it  as  contrary  to 
 the  religion  presently  professed,  and  as  irregu- 
 larly imposed,    without  consent  of  the  General 
 Assembly,  and  contrary  to  acts  of  Parliament. 
 From   all    these,    the    Earls   of   Sutherland   and 
 Wemys  formed  one  general  remonstrance,  which 
 was  subscribed  by  a  great  number  of  n(tbles.    In- 
 tent u|)on  executing  his  Majesty's  directions,  the 
 council  delayed  answering  of  these  petitions  ;  but 
 promised  to   ac(juaint    the    petitioners    witii    his 
 pleasure,  as  soon  as  it  should  be  signified  to  them. 
 And,  by  the  Duke  of   Lennox,   they  transmitted, 
 to  him  the  general  petition,  and  another  from  the 
 city  of  (Glasgow,  and  a  third  from  the  diocese  of 
 Dumblane,  in  whi(  h  he  alleged  the  service  book 
 had  l»een  cheerfidly  received.    They  also  inform- 
 ed him  of  their  diligence  in  executing  his  orders, 
 and  appointed  Lennox    to    lay   before  him  a  true 
 state  of"  the  circumstances  ol  the  n.'ition.    Highly 
 offended,  liial  the  council  would  not  sacrifice  their 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  ISl 
 
 own  consciences,  and  the  public  peace  and  tran- 
 quillity for  promoting  their  power  and  ceremo- 
 nies, the  bishops  represented  Sir  Thomas  Hope 
 his  Majesty's  advocate,  and  the  Earl  of  Traquair, 
 as  little  better  than  traitors,  that  secretly  sup- 
 ported the  rebels  in  their  remonstrances. 
 
 After  thanking  the  council  for  their  good  in^ 
 clinations  to  redress  their  grievances,  the  petition- 
 ers returned  home,  and  applied  themselves  to 
 search  their  own  ways,  and  turn  to  the  Lord, 
 by  confession,  prayer,  and  humiliation  for  sin- 
 to  assist  them  in  which  work,  Messrs.  Henderson, 
 Dickson,  and  Ker,  drew  up  some  directions. 
 Their  numbers  mightily  increased.  Sir  John  Hay, 
 the  new  provost  of  Edinburgh,  had  hindered  the 
 citizens  from  petitioning  along  with  their  bre- 
 thren. But  soon  after,  such  multitudes  of  them 
 attended  the  town  council  as  obliged  them  to  re- 
 monstrate to  the  standing  committee  of  the 
 privy  council  against  the  service  book,  and  to  pro- 
 mise to  have  the  petition  transmitted  to  his  Ma- 
 jesty. Hay  excused  this  petition,  as  originating 
 from  the  strangers,  which  had  lately  crowded  the 
 place;  and  Spotswood  thought  to  have  had  it  dis- 
 cussed  by  the  council,  before  any  others  could 
 come  up.  But  Archibald  Johnston,  afterwards 
 Lord  Warriston,  by  his  careful  information  of  his 
 friends,  prevented  that.  There  was  scarce  a  shire 
 southward  of  the  Grampain  hills,  from  which 
 noblemen,  gentlemen,  burghers,  ministers,  and 
 others,  did  not  convene  to  supplicate  the  coun- 
 cil, or  to  wait  for  their  answer  to  their  former 
 petitions.  Above  two  hundred  parishes  gave  in 
 new  supplications.  The  petitioners  being  now 
 too  many  for  common  consultation,  divided  them- 
 selves into  four  divisions  or  tables  of  nobility,  gen- 
 
152  A  COMPRNDIOUS   HISTORY  OT   THF 
 
 try,  ministers,  and  hnrpessrs,  wliicli  began  their 
 mt'('tiriq;.s  u  ilh  prayer,  and  ibrnuHl  a  survey  of 
 tlie  new  liturgy. 
 
 Informed  of  these  tilings,  Charles,  by  a  so- 
 lemn proclamation,  prcdiibited  the  council  to  pro- 
 ceed in  jiidi^int^  of  ecclesiastical  allairs,  and 
 charged  all  the  petitioners  to  return  to  their  re- 
 spective liomes,  under  pain  of  b(  ing  denounced 
 relv  Is.  And,  to  punish  the  citizens  of  Iklin- 
 burgh  for  their  joining  with  the  other  petitioners, 
 he  ordered  the  council  and  court  of  session  to 
 remove  to  Linlithgow,  and  thence  to  l^undee  ; 
 \vhich  occasioned  a  remarkable  interruption  of 
 public  justice  in  the  kingdom.  A  tract  aga  nst 
 the  E/tg/ish  Popish  ccrnnonies,  by  INIr.  George 
 Gillespy,  was  also  prohibited  by  public  procla- 
 mation. Spotswood  craftily  absented  himself 
 from  the  council.  But  the  malcontents,  look- 
 ing on  him  and  his  fellow  bishops  as  the  great 
 instruments  of"  oppression,  and  a  dead  weight 
 upon  the  other  lords  of  privy  council,  drew  up 
 a  formal  complaint  against  them,  in  which  they 
 charged  them  \\\\.\\  the  framing  of  the  service  book, 
 and  sowing  in  it  the  seeds  of  idolatry,  super- 
 stition, and  fal>e  doctrine,  contrary  to  the  religion 
 legally  establislx  d  ;  and  even  approaching  nearer 
 to  tlie  Popish  Missal  tlian  the  l.nglish  had  done; 
 — and  \\\\\\  forming  the  Ihxtk  of  Canons^  in 
 which  bishops  arc  empo>Nered  to  tyrannize  over 
 ministers  and  people  at  plcrisure , — by  which 
 means,  they  had  wionged  his  iNIajesty,  kindling 
 discord  between  him  andhi>  .subjects, and  between 
 the  subjects  themselves,--and  had  rent  the  church, 
 and  undei mined  her  doctrine,  worship,  discipline, 
 and  government; — and  tli(i(forc  they  begged, 
 that   they  might   be   brought   to  tlieir  trial,  and 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  133 
 
 duly  punished ;  and  in  the  mean  time,  not  be  al- 
 lowed to  sit  judges  upon  the  petitioners.  This 
 complaint  was  signed  by  twenty-four  noblemen, 
 some  hundreds  of  gentlemen,  some  hundreds  of 
 ministers,  and  most  of  the  burghs.  Nor  doth  it 
 appear,  that  any  but  Mr.  R.  Bailie,  afterward 
 principal  in  the  college  of  Glasgow^  did  hesitate 
 to  subscribe  it,  who  thought  some  expressions  of 
 it  too  severe. — Finding  that  their  former  suppli- 
 cation had  not  been  presented  to  his  majesty,  ac- 
 cording to  promise;  and  that  the  courts  of  jus- 
 tice were  removed  from  their  city  ;  and  that,  after 
 their  fellow  petitioners  returned  home,  they  would 
 be  exposed  to  the  resentment  of  their  provost, 
 severals  in  Edinburgh,  chiefly  women,  attended 
 the  town  council,  and  threatened  them,  that  un- 
 less they  would  concur  with  the  other  burghs  in 
 their  supplications  and  complaints,  and  would  re- 
 store Messrs.  Ramsey  and  Rollock,  their  minis- 
 ters, and  Henderson  a  reader,  they  w^ould  not 
 suffer  one  of  them  to  come  out  alive.  This  obliged 
 them  to  an  immediate  compliance.  These  fe- 
 male insurgents,  in  their  way  home,  had  handled 
 the  bishop  of  Galloway  and  the  provost  too  rough- 
 ly, had  not  the  nobles  prevented  them. 
 
 After  several  unsuccessful  addresses  to  the 
 privy  council,  the  numerous  supplicants  returned 
 home,  having  resolved  to  meet  again  upon  the 
 15th  of  November.  Then  greater  numbers  than 
 ever  attended  at  Linlithgow,  and  were  joined  by 
 the  Earl  of  Montrose,  and  some  other  noblemen. 
 Notwithstanding  the  counsellors  could  not  pre- 
 suade  them  of  the  lawfulnes  of  their  conventions, 
 they  agreed.  That,  since  their  grievances  were 
 not  like  to  be  soon  redressed,  the  noblemen,  with 
 two  gentclmen  from  every  shire,  and  a  minister 
 
134  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OP  THE 
 
 from  every  pres])ytery,  and  a  commissioner  from 
 every  hur^li,  should  attend  the  council,  and  the 
 rest  return  home.  They  also  aii^reed,  that  Ro- 
 thes, Montrose,  Lindsay,  and  Loudon,  as  depu- 
 ties for  the  nobles  ;  the  lairds  of  Reir,  Cunning- 
 hamiiead,  and  ()Id!)ar,  for  the  shires;  the  two 
 bailies  of  F^diidjurgh,  and  provost  of  Culross,  for 
 the  burghs;  and  Messrs.  James  Cunningham  and 
 Thomas  Ramsay  for  the  ministers,  should  ordi- 
 narily attend  at  Edinburgh  for  receiving  answers 
 of  petitions,  and  giving  in  remonstrances  to  the 
 council.  After  settling  a  method  of  gentlemen 
 serving  by  turns,  and  of  advertising  their  consti- 
 tuents in  case  of  need,  and  a  solemn  admonition 
 to,  and  promise  of  personal  and  family  reforma- 
 tion, most  of  them  returned  home. 
 
 The  above-mentioned  deputies  remonstrated  to 
 the  lords  of  privy  council.  That  if  they  find  his 
 jMajesty  not  rightly  informed  of  their  grievances; 
 or  it  they  obtain  not  redress  by  the  methods  agreed 
 upon,  it  shall  be  lawful  for  them  to  assemble  their 
 constituents; — that  such  bishops  or  ministers  as 
 have  slandered  their  conduct  as  seditious,  shall 
 be  obliged  to  give  satisfaction  for  their  offence  ; — 
 that  since  it  was  none  but  the  low  mob  that  rais- 
 ed the  late  tumult  in  Edinburgh,  the  council  shall 
 intercede  with  his  Majesty  for  the  return  of  the 
 courts  of  judicature  to  that  city; — that  Messrs. 
 Ramsay  and  Rollock  shall  be  reponed  to  their 
 charges ; — and  that  the  bishops  be  prohibited  to 
 urge  the  use  of  the  service  Injok,  till  his  Majesty's 
 pleasure  be  further  known.  They  were  the  more 
 zealous  on  this  last  point,  because  Wedderburn, 
 bishop  of  Brechin,  had  prohibited  the  town  coun- 
 cil of  that  place,  to  send  any  commissioners  to 
 sup])licate  against  it;  and,  upon  their  refusing  to 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  1^5 
 
 obey  him,  had  taken  instruments  in  the  name  of 
 God,  the  King,  and  himself,  as  a  privy  counsel- 
 lor, and  on  the  Sabbath  following-,  contrary 
 to  the  advice  of  the  Chancellor  and  Treasur- 
 er, had  gone  to  his  pulpit  to  read  the  service^ 
 armed  with  pistols,  his  servants,  if  not  also  his 
 wife,  being  prepared  to  second  his  warlike  at- 
 tempt. But  he  was  so  drubbed  by  some  of  the 
 people,  in  his  way  home,  that  he  never  repeated 
 his  dangerous  task. 
 
 Though  the  privy  council,  to  shift  a  proper  an- 
 swer to  the  people's  demands,  solemnly  protested 
 to  their  deputies,  that  they  were  not  regularly 
 met,  they,  as  constituted,  dispatched  two  mis- 
 sives, one  to  Charles,  and  another  to  the  Earl  of 
 Stirling,  secretary  for  Scottish  affairs  ;  in  which 
 they  represented  the  necessity  of  the  restoration 
 of  the  ordinary  courts  of  judicature,  and  their  own 
 reasons  for  yielding  so  far  to  the  aggrieved  sub- 
 jects. TheEarl  of  Roxburgh,  their  agent,  return- 
 ed from  London,  with  an  ample  commission 
 from  his  Majesty.  But  it  being  whispered^  that 
 he  had  orders  to  apprehend  some  of  the  principal 
 noblemen  among  the  petitioners,  the  deputies 
 convened  all  their  commissioners.  But,  upon 
 Traquair's  entreaty,  and  the  council's  promise  to 
 do  nothing  to  their  prejudice,  they  remained  at 
 Edinburgh.  Directed  by  his  Majesty's  letter, 
 the  council  made  three  acts,  declaring,  that  he 
 had  no  intention  of  altering  the  religion  presently 
 professed,  or  the  Imusofthe  country;  and  appoint- 
 ing two  meetings  of  council  every  week  at  Dal- 
 keith, and  thereafter  at  Stirling,  of  which  that 
 on  the  Thursday  should  discuss  complaints  and 
 grievances — and  aj)pointing  the  Court  of  Session 
 to  meet  in  the  beginning  of  February  next,  JGii8. 
 
 4. 
 
13G  A   COMPENDIOUS  HISTORV  OF  THE 
 
 for  tlio  adiniiiist ration  of  civil  aflairs,  wlii(  h,  lor 
 almost  a  year,  had  been  totally  interrupted,  or 
 run  into  ronliision.  'I'hc  n»alcontents  plainly 
 pcrc<Mve(l,  that,  by  the  ri'lh^ion  pnscnihj  t'stab- 
 lishrd,  (^harles  meant  Prelacy  and  its  attendant 
 snperstitir»ns,  and  by  the  Idwa  of  the  kin!j;dom, 
 such  as  had  !»een  enacted  since  his  father's  acces- 
 sion to  the  Eni^lish  throne; — the  council  there- 
 fore findinii;-  them  hiiihl/  disaffected,  and  that 
 they  could  not  apprehend  their  chiefs,  or,  by  pro- 
 mises or  presents,  detach  the  poorer  sort  from 
 them,  tried  several  methods  to  divide  them,  or 
 at  least  to  persuade  them  to  alter  their  supplica- 
 tion in  October  last;  especially  in  that  which  re- 
 spected the  bishops.  But  instead  of  comj)liance, 
 the  commissioners  supported  their  [)etiti()n,  evin- 
 ced their  duty  to  subscribe  it,  and  proved,  That 
 it  was  necesN[iry  for  the  honour  of  Christ,  the 
 preservation  of  their  religion  and  liberty,  and  for 
 the  honour  and  advantage  of  Rin^  and  country, 
 and  for  preventing  the  re-introduction  ot  Popery, 
 and  for  keeping  themselves  free  of  any  consent 
 to  the  innovations  imposed,  or  any  hand  in  the 
 persecution  of  their  faithful  brethren. 
 
 Finding  that  the  council  for  several  days  had 
 but  laboured  to  divide  them,  or  to  shift  their  re- 
 quests, the  deputies  appointed  two  of  their  num- 
 ber to  protest  at  each  door  of  the  council-house, 
 in  name  of  all  the  aggrieved  subjects,  That  they 
 ought  to  have  inmiediate  recourse  with  their  grie- 
 vances before  his  Majesty  himself,  and  to  j)rose- 
 cute  them,  in  a  legal  manner,  before  the  ordina- 
 ry judges  ;  that  the  bishops,  being  their  oppo- 
 site parties,  ought  not  to  sit  in  any  judicatory 
 as  judges  of  tlieir  cause,  till  once  they  should 
 have  purged  themselves  of  the  crimes  with  which 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  137 
 
 they  were  ready  to  charge  them  ;  that  it  shoukl 
 be  lawful  for  them,  in  religious  matters,  to  con- 
 form themselves  to  the  word  of  God,  and  lauda- 
 ])le  constitutions  of  this  church,  and  in  no  wise 
 dangerous  to  refuse    the    canons  or  liturgy  im- 
 posed without,  or  against,  the  acts  of  General 
 Assemblies,  or  laws  of  this  kingdom  ;  that  no  bad 
 consequences,  arising  from  the  council's  refusing, 
 or  shifting,  to  redress  their  grievances,  should  be 
 imputed  to  them ;  and  that  their  supplications 
 proceeded  from  conscience,  and  merely  tended  to 
 the  preservation  of  the  true  reformed  religion, 
 and  the  liberty  of  the  nation.      Informed  of  this 
 intended  protestation,  the  privy  counsellors  pro- 
 mised the  deputies  a  hearing  of  their  requests 
 upon  the  21st  of  December.    The  commissioners 
 therefore  appointed  the  twelve  deputies  to  pre- 
 sent their  supplication  and  complaint  to  the  coun- 
 cil, and  to  do  every  thing  necessary  for  obtaining 
 a  proper  answer  to  them.  They  also  agreed  upon 
 the  observation  of  a  general  Fast,  leaving  it  to 
 ministers  and  their  sessions  to  fix  the  time  and 
 assign  the  causes  of  it ; — and  advised  ministers 
 to  shew  their  people  the   heinous  nature  of  the 
 late  innovations,  and  how  contrary  they  were  to 
 the  national  covenant,    which    had  been  sworn 
 about  forty  years  before,  viz.  in  1596;  and  kind- 
 ly to  warn  universities  against  receiving  the  ser- 
 vice book,  or  tolerating  the  teaching  of  any  false 
 doctrine  among  them. 
 
 The  council  having  met,  and  the  bishops  with- 
 drawn— consisted  only  of  laymen.  Lord  Lou- 
 don, as  agent  for  the  other  deputies,  presented 
 two  copies  of  their  supplications,  which  had  been 
 given  in  September  and  October  preceding,  with 
 a  new  one,  in  which  they  complained  of  the  bU 
 
138  A  COMPENDIOUS    HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 shops  usine^  the  service  book ;  and  that  some  mi- 
 nisters of  E(iinl)ini;h  liad,  in  their  sermons  and 
 Otherwise,  reproached  their  lawful  attempts  for 
 redress  of  t;-rievances  as  seditious  and  rebellious — 
 and  hesoui^ht  their  lordships  to  deal  with  his  Ma- 
 jesty, and  to  their  utmost  endeavour  their  redress. 
 He  also  presented  a  dccHnature  of  the  bishops  as 
 judges  in  their  cause,  since  they  had  been  contrivers, 
 introducers,  and  ur^rers  of  the  rttura^j/  and  canons, 
 and  authors  of  their  other  grievances.  He  and  Mr. 
 Cuningham  enforced  their  supplications  with 
 most  affecting  speeches,  the  last  of  which,  it  is 
 said,  drew  tears  from  several  counsellors,  and 
 gained  Lord  Lorn,  afterwards  IMarquis  of  Argyle, 
 to  the  petioners'  side.  The  council,  from  con- 
 science or  from  necessity,  found  themselves  oblig- 
 ed to  represeni  the  whole  matter  to  his  Majesty, 
 and  not  agreeing  whether  to  depute  Roxburgh 
 or  Traquair  for  that  purpose,  they  left  it  to 
 Charles  to  choose  whom  he  pleased.  After  be- 
 ing imposed  upon  by  young  Spotswood,  president 
 of  the  session,  and  better  informed  by  a  letter 
 which  Rothes  had  sent  to  the  Earl  of  Hadding- 
 ton, he  called  up  Traquair,  who  refused  to  look 
 on,  or  carry  along  with  him,  an  information  from 
 the  deputies;  but  permitted  Lord  Orbiston,  jus- 
 tice clerk,  one  of  his  attendants,  to  carry  it.  Pre- 
 sident Spotswood  had  so  biassed  Charles,  that 
 Tra;;uair  had  no  small  diflirulty.  Stirling,  who,  by 
 I^aud's  direction,  ha<l  kept  ba(  k  part  ol  the  inl'or- 
 mation  sent  l)y  the  council,  was  at  last  left  in  the 
 lurch.  Instigated  by  a  letter  from  old  Spots- 
 wood,  the  archbishoj),  Charles  resolved  to  iiave 
 all  the  proceedings  of  the  malcontents  condem- 
 ned, and  every  thing  similar  prohibited  under 
 pain  of  high   treason.     Traquair  repeatedly  re- 
 
 1 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  139 
 
 inonstrated  against  this  step,  as  calculated  to  en- 
 danger the  public  peace  ;  i3ut  he  was  remanded 
 with  new  instructions  to  the  council 
 
 After  his  return  to  Scotland,  Traquair,  to  de- 
 ceive the  malcontent  deputies,  pretended,  That 
 he  had  brought  no  instructions  relative  to  their 
 affairs.  But  they,  being  informed  of  the  truth 
 by  their  friends  at  London,  appointed  four  or 
 five  of  their  number  to  attend  the  council  at  Stir- 
 ling. Traquair  and  Stirling  laboured  to  dis- 
 suade them  from  this,  or  at  most  to  send  up  only 
 TWO,  whom,  it  seems,  Traquair  intended  to  ap- 
 prehend  and  imprison  in  the  castle.  Some  of  the 
 bishops'  friends  talking  of  this,  the  malcontents 
 resolved  to  go  to  Stirling  in  a  body.  Traquair 
 diverted  them  from  this,  and  persuaded  them  to 
 depute  only  a  few.  Finding  them  determined  to 
 prosecute  their  attempts  for  the  preservation  of 
 their  religion  and  liberties,  he,  after  informing 
 them  that  the  council  was  to  sit  at  Stirling  to- 
 morrow, together  with  Roxburgh,  set  out  for  it 
 a  little  after  midnight,  intending  to  have  his  Ma- 
 jesty's instructions  approved  and  proclaimed  be- 
 fore any  of  the  deputies  could  come  up.  After 
 having,  to  no  purpose,  waited  two  hours  for  a 
 quorum  of  the  council,  they,  about  ten  o'clock, 
 forenoon,  proclaimed  his  Majesty's  mandates, 
 bearing,  That  he,  not  the  bishops,  was  the  origi- 
 nal cause  of  the  disputed  canons  and  liturgy;  that 
 he  condemned  all  conventions  of  his  subjects  in 
 order  to  form  supplications  against  these  pious 
 and  innocent  books,  as  altogether  illegal  and  se- 
 ditious, and  prohibited  all  such  meetings  for  the 
 future,  under  pain  of  rebellion; — that  none  should 
 approach  his  privy  council  without  special  allow- 
 ance ;  and  that  such  as  hud,  or  were  coming  up, 
 
140  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 for  any  such  purpose,  should  witliin  six  houis  de- 
 part from  Stirlinq-,  under  pain  of  liigh  treason. 
 Informed  by  his  own  servant  of  the  early  depar- 
 ture of  Tracpialr  and  Roxhurg^h,  Lord  Lindsay 
 and  the  Karl  of  Iliinie  posted  to  Stirling;  and 
 were  ready  with  a  public  notary  to  protest  against 
 the  king's  proclamation,  as  soon  as  it  was  read. — 
 They  further  remonstrated,  That  the  seeds  of 
 superstition  and  idolatry  are  contained  in  tiie  li- 
 furgy  and  canons,  and  many  other  novelties  ineun- 
 sistent  with  the  liberties,  laws,  and  religion  of 
 this  kingdom  ; — that  they  and  their  constituents 
 ought  to  bealloAved  to  accuse  the  bishops; — that 
 the  High  C'ommission  Court  is  contrary  to  the 
 fundamental  laws  of  the  nation,  and  calculated 
 to  establish  the  tyranny  of  bishops;  that  they 
 Avill  not  yield  to  the  bishops  as  their  judges,  till 
 they  have  manifested  their  innocence  in  some 
 competent  court;  and  that  all  their  meetings  and 
 supplications  had  no  other  end,  but  the  preserva- 
 tion of  the  purity  of  religion  and  of  his  Ma- 
 jesty's honour,  and  the  liberty  of  church  and 
 state.  The  rest  of  the  malcontent  commission- 
 ers came  up  in  the  afternoon,  but  could  not  ob- 
 tain a  copy  of  the  King's  proclamation.  They 
 refused  to  leave  Stirling  before  the  counsellors 
 promised  to  do  nothing  further  in  thtir  affair  ; 
 but  were  scarcely  gone  oft'  when  the  treacherous 
 council  met,  and  admitted  tlie  bishops  to  judge, 
 and  approved  his  ."Majesty's  proclamation. 
 
 Next  morning  the  deputies  waited  upon  the 
 council,  and  so  effectually  represented  the  impro- 
 priety and  sinfulness  of  their  conduct,  as  made 
 the  Karls  of  Angus  and  Napier  profess  tlieir  sor- 
 row for  their  rash  a|)probation  of  the  King's  pro- 
 clamation, and  Sir  Thomas  Hope,  his  advocate. 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  14^1 
 
 refused  to  subscribe  it.  When  the  proclamation 
 was  published  at  Linlithi^ow,  the  protest  taken 
 against  it  at  Stirling  was  renewed.  When  it  was 
 read  at  Edinburgh,  sixteen  noblemen,  with  a  great 
 number  of  barons,  gentlemen,  ministers,  and  bur- 
 gesses, protested  against  it,  and  that  they  should 
 have  immediate  recourse  to  his  IMajesty  and  other 
 competent  judges,  for  redress  of  their  grievances ; 
 that  the  bishops  should  not  be  held  their  lawful 
 judges,  till  they  had  purged  themselves  of  the 
 crimes  laid  to  their  charge  ;  that  no  deed  of  coun- 
 cil made  in  their  presence,  should  be  prejudicial 
 to  the  sup{)licants ;  that  no  danger  should  be  in- 
 curred for  disregarding  liturgy,  canons,  courts,  acts, 
 or  proclamations,  introduced  without,  or  contrary 
 to,  the  standing  laws  of  church  or  state  ;  and  that 
 no  bad  consequences  of  the  council's  refusing  to 
 hear  their  remonstrances,  and  redress  their  grie\'- 
 ances,  should  be  imputed  to  them. 
 
 Convinced  that  Traquair  and  Roxburgh  had 
 but  deceived  them,  instead  of  labouring  to  re- 
 move their  radical  grievances,  the  malcontents 
 assembled  at  Edinburgh  in  great  numbers,  in  Fe- 
 bruary 1638,  to  consider  more  fully  of  proper 
 methods  of  redress.  Moved  by  the  nobility,  as- 
 sisted by  Messrs.  Alexander  Henderson  and  Da- 
 vid Dickson,  all  the  tables  agreed  to  renew  their 
 national  covenant  vj'xih  God,  the  violation  of  which 
 they  judged  an  original  source  of  all  their  calami- 
 ties ;  and  a  committee  was  appointed  to  form  a 
 bond  suited  to  their  present  circumstances.  Af- 
 ter the  original  bond  of  1381,  and  a  list  of  many 
 acts  of  Parliament,  which  manifested  the  several 
 points  to  be  sworn,  as  commanded,  or  allowed  by 
 the  civil  laws,  they  subjoined  the  new  bond, 
 '.vhich  alone  was  to  be  sworn  and  subscribed.  'J'he 
 
i42  A   COMPRNDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 Earl  ofCassilis,  .Afr.  Bailie,  and  a  few  otiiers,  who 
 liad  been  edueated  in  lii^li  notions  of  his  Majes- 
 ty's prero^'-ati\  es,  or  of  tlie  lawfulness  of  Prelacy, 
 liad  some  dinicidtics  ;  hut  after  some  reasoning, 
 and  the  alteration  of  a  few  words,  all  present 
 agreed  to  it,  except  three  or  four  clergymen  from 
 Ano;us.  As  some  scrupled,  directly  to  condemn 
 the  Articles  of  Perth  and  other  innovations  as 
 vnlawjul  in  themselves,  the  draught  of  the  cove- 
 nant bond  referred  all  determination  on  that  point 
 to  the  first  free  General  Assembly,  and  engaged 
 the  swearers  to  no  more  than  ^forbearance  of  them 
 till  that  should  take  j)lace.  By  the  discipline  of 
 the  church,  they  meant  no  more  than  the  substan- 
 tial points  of  it  used  in  1581.  Such  as  had  sworn 
 conformity  to  the  novations  introduced,  were  told, 
 that  they  might  nevertheless  engage  to  forbear 
 the  use  of  them  for  a  time,  on  account  of  their 
 oflensivcness.  Such  as  suspected  that  the  bond 
 too  much  limited  the  maintenance  of  the  King's 
 authority,  were  told,  that  their  swearing  to  main- 
 tain his  avithority  in  the  defence  of  the  true  reli- 
 gion, and  of  the  laws  and  liberties  of  the  king- 
 dom, did  not  exclude  tlieir  maintenance  of  it  in 
 other  cases;  that  in  the  bond  of  J  58  I,  they  were 
 btill  more  expressly  bound  to  defend  their  reli- 
 gion ;  that  they  engaged  to  maintain  the  King's 
 authority  along  with  their  religion,  and  therefore 
 their  defending  of  one  another  in  the  maintenance 
 of  religion,  was  no  more  than  the  laws  of  the 
 kingdom  required  of  them.  Some  other  difficul- 
 ties were  started,  but  removed  in  a  IViendly  man- 
 ner. 
 
 The  ministers  having,  on  the  preceding  Sab- 
 bath, represented  the  breach  of  former  covenants 
 with  God  as  the  peculiar  spring  of  all  the  cala- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  143 
 
 mities  under  which  the  nation  had  groaned  ; 
 and  that  the  renovation  of  such  a  solem  dedica- 
 tion of  themselves  to  God,  was  a  proper  mean  of 
 obtaining  his  favour  and  help  for  their  deliverance, 
 the  covenant  was  sworn  on  the  first  Sabbath  of 
 March,  with  great  solemnity,  and  subscribed  by- 
 many  thousands,  viz.  all  the  nobility,  except  the 
 privy  counsellors,  and  four  or  five  more  ;  and  by 
 commissioners  from  all  the  shires  in  Scotland,  and 
 commissioners  from  all  the  burghs,  except  Aber- 
 deen, St.  Andrew's,  and  Crail  ;  and  by  a  multi- 
 tude of  gentlemen  and  ministers.  Copies  of  it 
 were  immediately  sent  to  every  presbytery,  along 
 with  a  demonstration  of  the  lawfulness  of  sub- 
 scribing it,  and  directions  how  it  should  be  taken 
 in  parishes ;  and  as  the  clergy  of  Aberdeen  and 
 Glasgow  chiefly  adhered  to  their  scruples,  some 
 ministers  were  appointed  to  deal  with  them.  Be- 
 fore the  end  of  April,  almost  the  whole  adult 
 persons  in  the  kingdom,  except  the  Papists,  who 
 were  then  about  600,  the  courtiers,  who  feared 
 his  Majesty's  displeasure,  and  some  clergymen 
 who  had  sworn  the  oath  of  conformity,  had  cheer- 
 fully concurred  in  the  covenant :  And  notwith- 
 standing the  opposition  of  their  clerical  doctors, 
 the  most  of  the  inhabitants  of  St.  Andrew's  and 
 Glasgow,  also  joined  in  it.  But  at  Aberdeen, 
 the  shrewd  reasoning  of  the  doctors,  together  with 
 the  general  inclination  to  Prelacy  and  supersti- 
 tion, had  no  small  influence.  We  have  elsewhere 
 proved,  from  many  authentic  vouchers,  that  there 
 were  few  adult  persons  in  Scotland,  who  did  not 
 take  the  covenant,  in  one  shape  or  other,  that 
 year. 
 
 Having  thus,  under  uncommon  influence  of  the 
 Spirit  of  God,  dedicated  themselves  to  him,  and 
 
1  1.1«  A  COMPHNDIOUS  HISTORY  OF   THK 
 
 be^un  to  reform  tiu'ir  practice  and  families,  tlie 
 covenanters  transmitted  a  supplication  to  his  Ma- 
 jesty, re[)resentin«;  the  eciuity  and  lef;ality  of  their 
 proceedini^s,  anci  the  injustice  of  the  bishops,  who 
 had  opposed  them  ;  and  they  besoui^ht  the  Duke 
 of  Lennox,  Marquis  of  Hamilton,  and  some  other 
 noble  courtiers,  to  intercede  with  him  for  a  gra- 
 cious answer.  The  privy  council  also  sent  up 
 Lord  Orbiston  to  inform  him  of  what  had  hap- 
 pened, and  to  bei;*  that  he  would  put  a  stop  to 
 the  ?i()vaf lon^' cou\\)\'d\n(jd  of,  or  at  least  allow  the 
 consciences  of  his  subjects  a  fair  hearin;;.  Spots- 
 wood,  deep  drowned  in  debt,  and  other  bishops, 
 wdio  knew  themselves  to  be  hated  by  the  people, 
 lied  off"  to  the  court.  Orbiston,  accordin<^  to  his 
 instructions,  faithfully  informed  his  Majesty,  and 
 disposed  him  to  receive  further  information,  for 
 obtaining-  of  which,  Tracpiair,  lioxburt^h,  and 
 Lorn,  were  called  up  to  him.  The  Scotch  law- 
 yers beiiiij^  con>.uUed,  Whether  the  covenanters 
 assemblini;  themselves,  without  his  ^Majesty's  au- 
 thority, protestini;  a^^ainst  his  royal  proclama- 
 tions, and  cnterini;'  into  covenant  with  (Tod,  and 
 with  each  other,  were  warrantable  by  law,  gave 
 their  opinion.  That  most  of  their  conduct  was 
 legal,  and  none  of  it  against  any  exj)ress  law.  It 
 was  even  suspected,  that  they  had  walked  by  the 
 direction  of  Sir  Thomas  Hope,  the  King's  advo- 
 cate, in  the  most  critical  steps  of  it.  No  sooner 
 liad  the  three  commissioners  got  to  London,  than 
 the  Scotch  affairs  were  taken  into  serious  consi- 
 deration. 'I'he  bishops,  chietly  of  Brechin  and 
 Murray,  i'oreseeing  that  they  would  be  inevitably 
 ruined,  if  Charles  should  incline  to  clemency, 
 did  all  that  lay  in  their  power  to  exasperate  him 
 Jo  the  most  violent  mea:>ures  against   the  cove- 
 
 / 
 
CHURCH   OK   SCOTLAND,  145 
 
 panters.  The  noblemen  with  great  zeal  opposed 
 them.  Lorn  candidly  laid  open  all  that  he  knew 
 of  the  grievances  of  his  country,  and  declared 
 his  dislike  of  the  Articles  of  Perth,  the  liturgy,  and 
 canons,  and  of  the  conduct  of  the  bishops ;  and 
 that  he  was  resolved  rather  to  leave  his  country, 
 than  to  concur  in  binding  these  burdens  upon  his 
 fellow  subjects.  As  Traquair  insisted  for  peace- 
 able methods,  the  bishops  reproached  him  with 
 giving  the  covenanters  intelligence,  while  he,  to 
 avenge  himself,  charged  the  miscarriage  of  his 
 Majesty's  designs  on  their  imprudence  and  vio- 
 lence.—Fearing  that  the  commencement  of  a  war 
 in  Scotland  might  give  the  English  malcontents 
 an  opportunity  of  obtaining  their  wished  redress, 
 the  English  counsellors  were  no  less  averse  to  it  than 
 the  Scotch.  Lennox,  in  a  fine  and  warm  oration, 
 remonstrated  that  there  was  no  present  necessity 
 for  a  war ;  nor  were  the  motives  of  such  impor- 
 tance as  to  plunge  the  two  kingdoms  into  a  war, 
 in  which,  be  victorious  who  would,  his  Majesty 
 would  lose  a  multitude  of  his  subjects,  or  the 
 hearts  of  such  as  survived  it ;  and  insisted,  that 
 either  the  occasion  of  the  present  ferment  should 
 be  removed  out  of  the  way,  or  time  should  be  al- 
 lowed for  it  gradually  to  work  off,  or  his  Majesty 
 might  yield  to  the  covenanters'  demands.  These 
 and  like  speeches,  with  the  news  of  multitudes 
 entering  into  the  covenant,  made  Charles  prefer 
 peace,  and  made  the  bishops  to  be  looked  upon  as 
 the  real  enemies  of  the  kingdom. 
 
 About  this  time,  Presbyteries,  disregarding 
 their  espiscopal  superiors,  began  to  ordain  mini- 
 sters without  consulting  them,  and  removed  their 
 constant  moderators.  Rutherford  returned  to 
 Anworth   in   Galloway;   I^ivingston,   Hamilton, 
 
 u 
 
146  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THK 
 
 M^Lellan,  Blair,  and  I\o\v,  who  had  been  driven 
 from  Ireland,  were  sctllcd  in  vacancies,  or  as  as- 
 sistants to  others.  The  Ej)iscopalian  doctors  of 
 St.  Andrew's  published  their  reasons  for  refusini^ 
 the  covenant,  and  Drs.  Haron  and  Forbes  of  Aber- 
 deen conmunced  a  paper  war  with  the  covenan- 
 ters. lUit  botli  were  quickly  silenced  by  more 
 nervous  replies.  The  King's  suspension  oC  the 
 civil  courts  for  about  a  year  tempted  some  Jliij^ii- 
 landers  of  his  party  to  plunder  and  o[)press  their 
 neighbours,  and  some  women  and  low  rabhle  to 
 abuse  some  contbrm  clergy. — ^\hile  the  covenant- 
 ing clergy  did  what  they  could  to  prevent  or  sup- 
 press such  riots,  the  bisiiops  and  their  agents  im- 
 proved them,  to  provoke  his  ^Miijesty  to  an  open 
 war  with  the  whole  covenanters. 
 
 Charles  having  resolved  for  a  time  to  yield 
 something  to  them,  he  was  on  the  point  of  en- 
 trusting that  critical  management  to  Traquair : 
 but  the  bishops,  who  reckoned  him  their  mortal 
 enemy,  by  a  long  and  trifling  accusation,  divert- 
 ed him  from  this.  'J'he  Marquis  of  Hamilton 
 was  therefore  entrusted  with  it.  To  prevent  all 
 division  of  the  covenanters  among  themselves, 
 by  any  concessions  which  his  Majesty  might  of- 
 fer, the  Earls  of  Rothes,  Cassilis  and  ^lontrose, 
 drew  up  a  draught  of  the  lo^uest  terms  upon  which 
 the  religion  and  liherties  of  the  nation  could  be 
 settled  in  a  solid  manner,  viz.  That  the  service 
 hook  and  boo/c  of  canons  should  be  discharged;  that 
 the  HiLi;h  Commission  Court  should  be  for  ever 
 dissolved  ;  that  the  articles  >>/' Perth  should  not  be 
 urged  by  authority;  that  no  clergymen  should 
 have  vote  in  l^arliajucnf^  without  an  exact  suhmis- 
 sion  to  the  caveats  fixed  hy  the  Cieneral  As- 
 sembly 1600;  that  no  unlawful  articles  or  oaths 
 
CHURCH  OF-SCOTLAND.  147 
 
 should  be  imposed  upon  entrants  to  the  minis- 
 try; that  proper  security  should  be  given  for  the 
 holding  of  yearly  General  Assemblies ;  and  that 
 a  Parliament  should  be  called  for  the  redress  of 
 grievances.  To  preserve  unity  among  themselves, 
 the  covenanters  farther  agreed,  That  no  answer 
 should  be  given  to  statesmen  without  com.mon 
 consent ;  that  a  committee  should  be  chosen  out 
 of  each  table  to  prepare  and  manage  matters;  and 
 that  some  gentlemen,  ministers,  and  burghers, 
 should  meet  with  the  nobles,  that  it  might  not 
 be  thought  they  took  too  much  upon  them  ;  tliat 
 all  of  them  should  attend  at  Edinburgh  as  ap- 
 pointed ;  that,  to  shew  their  adversaries  that  their 
 principal  strength  did  not  lie  in  their  nobility, 
 fewer  of  these  should  attend  than  formerly;  that 
 if  any  proclamation  be  issued  contrary  to  the  de- 
 sign of  their  former  supplications,  it  should  be  an- 
 swered by  a  protest,  containing  for  substance  the 
 eight  articles  above  mentioned;  that  if  his  Majesty 
 prohibit  the  canons  and  liturgy^  and  limit  the 
 High  Commission,  they  shall  insist  for  the  redress 
 of  their  other  grievances,  and  none  rest  content 
 with  less  than  the  said  eight  articles  contain  ;  that 
 the  number  of  commissioners  be  doubled  against 
 the  time  of  Hamilton's  arrival ;  that  the  reports 
 of  the  subscription  of  the  covenant  be  called  up 
 from  every  corner  of  the  kingdom ;  and  that  they 
 should  observe  a  solemn/tw/,  to  confess  their  own 
 sins,  and  implore  God's  favour  and  help  at  their 
 general  meeting. 
 
 While  the  bishops  that  remained  in  Scotland 
 gave  all  the  information  they  could  against  the 
 covenanters  to  court,  Hamilton  having  received 
 twenty-eight  instructions  from  his  Majesty,  part 
 of  which  he  was  to  conceal  or  avow,  as  circum- 
 
14t  A   iOMPENDIULS    HISTOUY   OV   Hit 
 
 j^tances  irquiird,  pnparcJ  for  his  journey  to  Scot- 
 land. Hut,  fearing'  that  his  I'urious  countrymen 
 might,  by  their  advice,  counteract  his  pencelul  at- 
 tempts in  Ills  al)s('nct',  he  rcfusetl  to  leave  the 
 court,  till  as  many  of  them  as  could  ho  s[)ared, 
 were  ordered  down  !)efQre  him.  This  was  ex- 
 tremely disa«;rcealjle  to  the  !)ishops,  and  to  Pre- 
 ^Mdt•Ilt  Spotswoud  and  Sir  John  Hay,  formerly 
 mentioned,  as  they  knew  themselves  to  be  detest- 
 ed at  home;  and  several  of  them  were  in  danger 
 of  prosecutions  for  debt.  No  sooner  had  Hamil- 
 ton arrived  at  Edinburgh,  than  he  found,  to  his 
 great  dissatisfaction,  tliat  the  covenanters  had 
 agreed,  that  not  one  of  them  should  wait  upon 
 him  without  theeoncurrenceofalltherest.  Charles, 
 on  the  other  hand,  sent  sixty  barrels  of  powder, 
 and  some  hundred  stands  of  arms  and  matches, 
 to  be  lodged  in  the  Castle,  to  be  used  against 
 them,  if  his  proposals  should  not  succeed.  Being 
 secretly  landed  at  Fisherrow,  and  thence  convey- 
 ed to  Dalkeith,  this  occasioned  a  report  that 
 Tracpiaii  had  brought  them  to  blow  up  the  cove- 
 nanters, when  they  should  meet  to  confer  with 
 Hamilton  ;  and  his  vindication  of  liimself  gave 
 too  nmeli  ground  to  suspect  his  Majesty's  hostile 
 inlentions.  It  was  also  reported,  that  Ilamilton, 
 as  he  passed,  had  ordered  the  sheriffs  of  Northum- 
 berland to  have  their  trained  bands  in  readiness. 
 Nor  did  he  appear  capable  of  clearing  himself. 
 It  was  also  reported,  that  the  Earls  of  Hunile}, 
 Herreis,  Aberc^rn,  and  Winton,  intended  to 
 man  h  their  w  hole  forces  to  Edinburgh  for  sup- 
 porting his  Majesty's  j)leasurc.  The  covenanters, 
 who  as  yet  appear  to  have  purchased  no  arms 
 from  abroad,  set  a  watch  upon  the  castle,  that  it 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCUTLAND.  1*^ 
 
 might  not  be  reinforced  or  supplied  with  any 
 thing  more  than  necessary  provisions. 
 
 The  marquis  of  Hamilton  having  taken  up  his 
 lodging  at  Dalkeith,  the  privy  counsellors  met 
 with  him  there  ;  all  of  whom  the  ministers  served 
 with  an  earnest  intreaty  to  subscribe  their  cove- 
 nant     The  covenanters,  thinking  it  neither  safe 
 nor   convenient  to  attend  the  privy  council  at 
 Dalkeith,  Hamilton,  after  some  altercation,  and 
 a  treaty,  came  to  Edinburgh,  where  about  20,000 
 of  thein,  five  or  seven  hundred  of  whom  were  nii- 
 nisters,  met  him;  together  with  the  town  council, 
 inhabitants,  and  an  infinity  of  women  and  chil- 
 dren ;    and   old  Mr.   William    Livingston    wel- 
 comed  him  with  a  short  address.— In  vain  each 
 party  laboured  to  find   out  the  secrets  of  the 
 other.     At  last,  Hamilton  told  them,  that   his 
 majesty  was  willing  to  abolish  the  canons,  liturgy, 
 and  other  grievances,  providing  they  would  give 
 up  with  their  covenant.      By  appointment,  Mr. 
 Alexander  Henderson  drew  up  reasons  against 
 this,  bearing.  That  it  would  involve  them  in  per- 
 jury before  God  ;— would  imply  an  acknowledg- 
 ment of  the  unlawfulness  of  their  covenanting;— 
 would  mark  the  vilest  ingratitude  to  God,  who 
 had  singularly  encouraged  them  in  it ; —  would 
 deny  his  commandment^binding  them  to  vow  and 
 pay  to   him; — would  condemn   whatever   like 
 work  had  been,   or  might  be,  transacted  in  this 
 church  ;    that  they  could  not  give  up  their  cove- 
 nant without  the  consent  of  God  and  every  per- 
 son  concerned  in  it ;— that  it  could  not  be  expect- 
 ed, that  their  surrender  of  it  would  influence 
 their  opponents  to  concur  with  them  in  swearmg 
 to  the  same  things  by  virtue  of  a  new  command, 
 but  would  repreeent  them  as  inconstant,  as  breaks 
 
150  A   cOMrtNDIOUS   HISTORY  Of   THE 
 
 ers  of  tlicir  oath,  and  deniersof  their  faitli,  while 
 God  was  calling  them  to  confess  it.  The  marquis 
 could  obtain  no  niorc%  than  tliat  the  body  of  the 
 covenanters  siiould  retire  from  Edinburgh,  leav- 
 ing some  deputies  to  transact  with  him  in  their 
 name.  These  deputies  immediately  drew  up  a 
 supplication,  in  which,  after  an  enumeration  of 
 their  grievances,  they  insisted  for  dijree  General 
 Asscvibhj,  and  a  Parliament,  in  order  speedily  to 
 redress  them,  as  they  were  daily  growing  worse 
 and  worse.  And,  to  procure  an  immediate  an- 
 swer, they  dispersed  a  paper  to  be  advised  upon, 
 so  as  it  might  come  into  the  hands  of  the  cour- 
 tiers, bearing.  That  since  the  grievances  com- 
 plained of  respected  the  whole  kingdom,  the 
 remedies  behoved  to  be  equally  public  and  exten- 
 sive, and  eifectual  for  preventing  like  grievances 
 in  time  coming  ;  that  only  a  free  Assembly  and 
 Parliament  are  able  to  produce  such  effects  ;  that 
 the  bishops  could  not  be  their  judges,  till  they 
 purge  themselves  of  the  crimes  laid  to  their 
 charge  ;  that,  if  the  court  take  dilatory  methods, 
 it  would  be  proper  to  consider  of  some  other  me- 
 thod of  calling  a  General  Assembly  ;  that,  if  the 
 court  should  violently  enforce  obedience  to  their 
 will,  a  committee  should  be  allowed  to  deliberate 
 what  might  be  done  for  the  defence  of  their  reli- 
 gion, liberty,  and  laws.  Perhaps  these  strong 
 hints  disposed  the  marquis  to  receive  their  peti- 
 tion with  the  more  appearance  of  regard. 
 
 lie  offered  to  proclaim  his  majesty's  pleasure  ; 
 hut  the  deputies,  knowing  that  it  would  not  be 
 satisfactory,  assured  him,  that  they  would  be  con- 
 strained to  protest  against  it  ;  that  thereby  they 
 might  justilytlieir  own  aud  their  fathers'  conduct; 
 tliat  llu  V  in>  :ht  manifest  their  adherence  to  their 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLA.ND.  151 
 
 former  testimonies ;  that  they  might  preserve  and 
 manifest  their  union  among  themselves  ;  and 
 that  thoy  might  publicly  thank  his  majesty  for 
 the  concessions  which  he  had  made.  When  he 
 saw  that  the  deputies  had  erected  their  scaffold 
 for  theEarl  of  Cassilis,  Mr.  William  Livingston, 
 and  two  others,  to  protest  against  the  proclama- 
 tion at  the  cross  of  Edinburgh,  he  forbore  to  pub- 
 lish it ;  and,  as  if  earnestly  desirous  of  peace,  re- 
 quired a  conference  with  the  deputies.  They  ap- 
 pointed Rothes,  Montrose,  and  Loudon,  to  con- 
 fer with  the  Earls  of  Traquair,  Southesk,  and 
 Lord  Lorn.  As  the  agents  from  Hamilton  pre- 
 tended, that  in  the  covenant  there  seemed  to  be 
 a  combination  for  protecting  delinquents  against 
 public  authority  and  law,  in  other  points  besides 
 those  which  concerned  the  religion  and  liberties 
 of  the  kingdom  ;  the  covenanters,  in  a  remon- 
 strance, explained  this,  and  gave  the  strongest 
 assurances  of  their  loyaliy,  and  again  petitioned 
 for  a  free  Assembly  and  Parliament.  Chiefly 
 intending  to  gain  time,  till  his  majesty  should  be 
 ready  to  attack  them  with  the  sword,  Hamilton 
 proposed  to  the  covenanters,  that  since  his  pre- 
 sent instructions  could  not  content  them,  he 
 would  ride  post  to  London,  and  represent  their 
 case,  in  consequence  of  which,  he  hoped  quickly 
 to  return  with  more  satisfying  proposals.  Igno- 
 rant of  his  vi^icked  designs,  they  relished  his  mo- 
 tion, and  besought  him  to  agent  their  cause  with 
 his  majesty,  and  procure  them  a  free  Assembly 
 and  Parliament;  and  added,  that  if  he  did  not 
 quickly  return,  they  should  be  excused,  if  they 
 took  it  for  a  denial  of  their  request ;  that  their 
 cause  should  be  no  wise  hurt  by  proclamations, 
 or  any  thing  else,  before  his  return  ;  that,  in  the 
 
152  A    tOMrKN'UlOLS    HISTORY   OK    IIIK 
 
 mean  time,  no  forts  shoulil  be  repaired  or  forti- 
 fied, or  lawful  coinmerce  by  sea  or  land  interrupt- 
 ed ;  that  none  of  the  bishops  should  repair  to 
 court,  or,  if  ealled  up,  should  return  with,  or  be- 
 fore him  ;  and  that  tiie  liturgy  and  auiojis  should 
 be  of  no  force. 
 
 To  deceive  the  covenantini;  conimissif)ners,  and 
 make  most  of  them  return  honje,  Hamilton  pre- 
 tended to  set  off  for  London  ;  but  returned  next 
 da  V,  when  he  hoped  there  would  be  none  to  protest; 
 puhlislu'd  a  j)ro(:hiination,  |)rohal)ly  drawn  up  by 
 bimstif  in  his  Majesty's  name,  in  which  he  pro- 
 mised never  to  ur«^e  the  observation  of  the  liturgy 
 and  canniu,  but  in  a  fair  and  legal  manner;  that 
 he  intended  no  alteration  of  the  reliorion  or  laws 
 of  the  kini^dom  ;  that  he  would  rectify  the  Hisfb 
 Commission  by  advice  of  his  council;  that  with 
 the  first  conveniency  he  would  call  a  free  Gene- 
 ral Assembly  and  Parliament,  for  the  establish- 
 ment of  the  religion  presently  professed.  The 
 Earl  ofCassilis,  Alexander  Gibson,  laird  of  Dury, 
 Archibald  Johnson,  advocate,  John  Ker,  minister 
 of  IVestonpans,  and  James  Fletcher,  provost  of 
 Dundee,  protested  againt  it.  Being  informed, 
 that  the  j)rivy  council  was  solicited  to  approve  of 
 this  proclamation,  the  covenanters  delivered  to 
 the  Marquis,  anil  every  other  member,  a  copy  of 
 their  reasons  against  the  ratification  of  it,  bear- 
 ing. That  it  did  not  disallow  or  abolish  the  //7//r- 
 /,n/  and  canoru,  but  confirmed  the  proclamation 
 of  Fehruary  19th,  and  directly  avowed,  that  they 
 might  l)e  legally  imposed;  that  it  did  not  abolish, 
 but  establish  the  High  Commission  Court;  that 
 it  did  not  grant  any  of  their  recpiests,  but  con- 
 demned their  procedure  as  disorderly  and  crimi- 
 nal ;  that  it  ;rave  no  ground  to  hope  for  freedom 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLANC.  153 
 
 from  the  articled  of  Perth,  but  the  contrary  ;  that 
 it  altogether  concealed  the  guilt  of  the  bishops; 
 that  it  gave  no  certainty  of  a  free  Assembly  or 
 Parliament ;  that  it  did  not  acknowledge  these 
 things,  of  which  they  had  complained,  as  innova- 
 tions or  superstitious ;  but  represented  them  as 
 means  of  confirming  religion.  But  before  the 
 counsellors  got  these  reasons,  all  of  them  but 
 Lorn  and  Southesk  had  subscribed  the  procla- 
 mation, at  their  own  houses,  and  attested  it  to 
 be  sufficient  to  content  all  his  Majesty's  good  sub- 
 jects. 
 
 The  disappointed  covenanters,  after  solemn 
 supplications  to  God,  presented  to  the  Marquis 
 a  complaint  of  the  counsellors  approbation  of  the 
 proclamation,  bearing,  That  thereby  the  Lords 
 had,  without  hearing  them,  condemned  their  pro- 
 ceedings as  criminal,  and  part  of  them  as  treason- 
 able; had  confirmed  all  the  calumnies  of  their  ad- 
 versaries against  them,  and  justified  the  injuries 
 which  they  had  received;  and  stopt  the  course  of 
 his  Majesty's  favour  towards  them,  on  better  in- 
 formation ;  had  provoked  him  to  use  his  power 
 against  them  as  disobedient  subjects;  had  prema- 
 turely shewed,  that  they  would  asi*ist  his  Majesty 
 in  executing  his  threatenings  against  them; — and 
 therefore  they  begged  them  to  rescind  their  act. 
 Moved  herewith,  the  Lords  never  rested  till  they 
 got  back  their  act  and  tore  it  to  pieces.  Hamil- 
 ton then  offered  the  covenanters  a  more  favour- 
 able proclamation,  prohibiting  the  observance  of 
 the  liturgTj  and  canons ,  and  rescinding  all  acts  of 
 council  in  favours  of  them,  and  forbidding  the 
 High  Commission  to  sit  till  it  should  be  duly  re- 
 gulated. But  as  this  did  not  satisfy  the  covenan- 
 ters it  was  not  published.      They  nevertheles!? 
 
 X 
 
154  A   COMPENDIOUS    HISTORY  01    THE 
 
 j»romised  to  behave  (juietly  till  tlie  .Alanjuia 
 i^hould  ^(}  to  London,  and  inl'onii  his  Majesty 
 Jiow  things  stood,  and  return.  Meanwhile  Cliarles 
 carried  on  his  preparations  in  Kn;;land  and  Irc- 
 lanil  tor  a  \s  arlike  inva>i(jn  of*  his  native  country; 
 and  his  doctors  of  Aljerdeen  did  what  they  could, 
 liy  p\d)lishiiii^  their  objections  and  duplies,  to  op- 
 pose and  disgrace  the  covenanters'  bond.  But 
 these  were  so  answered  by  Messrs.  Henderson 
 and  Oickson,  that  a  considerable  number  in  and 
 about  Aberdeen,  both  ministers  and  peo|)le,  sub- 
 scribed the  covenant,  notwithstanding  all  that 
 the  doctors  and  Earl  of  Huntley  could  do  to  re- 
 strain them. 
 
 In  consecpiencc  of  Hamilton's  information  con- 
 cerning Scotch  aflairs,  Charles,  after  declaring 
 his  own  adherence  to  the  Confession  of  Faith  es- 
 tablished in  1.'360,  empowered  him  to  cause  all 
 the  mend)ers  of  privy  council  to  subscribe  it,  to- 
 gether with  a  neiu  bond  for  the  maintenance  of 
 its  doctrines,  and  of  the  Ring's  authority.  If  they 
 complied,  he  might  call  a  General  Assembly 
 when  and  where  they  pleased,  but,  it  behoved 
 Lim  to  take  care  that  the  bishops  should  have 
 power  to  vote,  anil  one  of  them  be  moderator; 
 that  he  might  declare  the  articles  of  Perth  indilfer- 
 ent,  and  that  ministers  should  be  admitted,  as 
 befcjre  the  late  commotions  ;  that  he  should  re- 
 strict the  power  of  bishops  as  little  as  possible ; 
 and  might,  if  he  found  j)roper,  publish  the  last 
 nHiitioni'd  proclamation  and  act  of  council.  He 
 had  oth(  r  private  instructions  to  take  care  oi pre- 
 Ian/  and  y>;vA//,  .v. 
 
 Kelurning  to  Kdinburgh,  Hamilton  demanded 
 of  the  covenanters,  That  all  those  ministers  that 
 had  l>ecn  suspended   by  Presbyteries  since  .lanu- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  155 
 
 ary  last,  without  warrant  of  their  bishop,  should 
 he  reponed  in  their  charges  ;  that  all  their  former 
 moderators  of  Presbyteries  be  reponed  in  their 
 places ;  that  such  ministers  as  have  been  admit- 
 ted since  that  time  leave  their  charges ;  that  peo- 
 ple resort  to  their  own  churches  ;  that  no  mini- 
 sters come  to  the  Assembly,  unless  they  be  cho- 
 sen commissioners;  that  all  the  lawful  moderators 
 of  Presbyteries,  be  commissioners ;  that  no  lay 
 person,  i.  e.  ruling  elder,  should  interfere  in  the 
 choice  of  commissioners  from  Presbyteries;  that 
 they  should  either  give  up,  or  alter  their  cove- 
 nant ;  that  they  should  forbear  their  meetings  in 
 time  coming ;  that  ministers  should  have  their 
 stipends  paid,  and  be  secured  in  their  persons. — 
 The  covenanters,  having  answered  these  demads 
 in  a  manner  that  shewed  they  could  not  be  easily 
 imposed  on,  Hamilton  reduced  them  all  to  two, 
 namely,  That  no  lay  elders  or  ministers  of  ano- 
 ther Presbytery  should  vote  in  the  choice  of  com- 
 missioners to  the  Assembly;  and  that  the  Assembly 
 should  meddle  with  nothing  which  had  been  es- 
 tablished by  the  Parliament,  unless  in  remon- 
 strances  and  petitions  to  that  supreme  court.  Af- 
 ter some  friendly  dispute  among  themselves,  the 
 covenanters  rejected  these  demands,  as  snares 
 laid  to  entrap  them;  and  finding  that  the  Marquis 
 did  not  shew  due  forwardness  in  calling  such 
 a  free  Assembly  as  they  wished,  they  resolved  to 
 call  one  themselves,  and  published  their  reasons 
 for  so  doing,  viz.  That  General  Assemblies  were 
 necessary  for  the  welfare  of  the  church  ;  that 
 Christ  had  given  his  church  full  power  to  convene 
 and  hold  councils  when  necessary  ;  that  by  virtue 
 of  this  divine  right,  this  church  had  long,  with 
 remarkable  countenance  from  God,  held  her  Ge- 
 
]')G  A   COMPKNOIOUS   HIbTORY  OF  THK 
 
 ncral  Asseml)lios;  that  the  laws  of  the  land,  and 
 even  the  corrupt  Assemhlies  of  160'j,  and  IGIO, 
 allowed  the  necessity  of  General  Assemblies ; 
 that  at  present  a  General  Assembly  was  peculi- 
 arly necessary  for  the  suj)pression  of  error,  re- 
 dressing of  grievances,  restoring  of  discipline, 
 peace,  and  unity  ;  for  the  mutual  edification  of 
 ministers  and  j)eople  ;  for  confirmin*,^  such  a  doubt 
 of  the  truth;  for  protecting  faithful  ministers, 
 and  censuring  Popish  and  Arminian  teachers. 
 Tliey  also  solved  the  objections  which  might  be 
 made  to  their  calling  of  it. 
 
 Finding  that  the  covenanters  were  resolved  to 
 have  an  Assembly  more  free  than  his  instructions 
 permitted  him  to  call,  Hamilton,  with  no  small 
 difficulty,  persuaded  them  to  delay  all  steps  to- 
 ward calling  one  themselves,  till  he  should  again 
 post  to  London,  and  solicit  his  Majesty's  concur- 
 rence with  their  views.  They  agreed  to  wait  till 
 the  20th  of  September,  upon  condition  that  he 
 should  insist  with  his  Majesty,  that  the  Assembly 
 should  be  frke,  both  as  to  its  members,  and  the 
 matters  handled  in  it ;  that  it  should  be  held 
 within  a  short  time;  and  that  it  should  meet  in 
 a  place  most  conmiodious  for  all  concerned  ;  and 
 that  all  interception  of  their  letters  in  England 
 might  be  prohibited. — INIean while,  the  deputies 
 agreed  upon  ui  lks  of  choosing  commissioners  to 
 the  Assembly  to  be  transmitted  to  the  several  Pres- 
 byteries, viz.  I'hat  the  number  of  commissioners 
 should  be  regulated  by  the  act  of  the  Assembly  at 
 Dundee  in  l';97;  that  their  commission  should 
 empower  them  to  act  according  to  the  word  of 
 (jn«l.  and  the  confession  of  faith  in  every  thing 
 judged  ;  tliat  every  kirk  session  should  have  an 
 ♦'Ider  nl  the  Presliytery,  when  the  commissioners 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  157 
 
 should  be  chosen  ;  that  ministers  under  scandal 
 be  immediately  processed,  in  order  to  prevent 
 their  being  chosen  for  commissioners ;  that  no 
 moderators  of  Presbyteries  be  members  of  As- 
 sembly by  virtue  of  their  office ;  that  notwith- 
 standing their  late  solemn  fast  upon  the  22d  and 
 29th  of  July,  they  should  observe  another  on  the 
 Sabbath  immediately  before  the  election  of  com- 
 missioners, in  order  to  implore  the  Lord's  direc- 
 tion in  this  important  step.  As  not  a  few  of  the 
 clergy  were  averse  from  ruling  elders  sitting  with 
 them,  in  Presbyteries,  Synods,  or  Assemblies,  co- 
 pies of  a  paper,  proving  by  a  great  many  acts  of 
 Assembly  and  Parliament,  that  such  officers  had, 
 and  ought  to  be  in  this  church,  in  order  to  pro- 
 cure ready  access  for  them  into  Presbyteries.  More- 
 over secret  instructions  were  transmitted  to  the 
 more  trusty  clergymen,  bearing.  That  they  should 
 protest  against  the  choosing  of  any  for  commis- 
 sioners, that  were  under  any  process  for  scandal; 
 that  they  should  take  care  to  have  the  bishops 
 timely  brought  under  process  for  their  offensive 
 behaviour;  that  ministers  prepare  themselves  for 
 disputing  upon  such  points  as  are  like  to  be  hand- 
 led in  the  Assembly  ;  that  three  ministers  be  cho- 
 sen out  of  every  Presbytery,  where  they  can  be 
 had  well  affected  to  the  cause  of  truth  ;  that  the 
 well  affected  consult  among  themselves  before  tlie 
 election,  that  their  election  may  fall  on  the  same 
 persons;  that  the  election  of  such  as  have  chosen 
 bishops,  have  sat  in  the  High  Commission,  have 
 countenanced  the  Ring's  chapel  ceremonies,  or 
 have  offered  to  observe  the  liturgy  and  canojis^  or 
 have  been  justices  of  peace,  be  avoided,  unless 
 they  have  acknowledged  the  sinfulness  of  their 
 former  courses ;  that  where  well  affected  noble- 
 
1j8        a  compendious  history  or  Tin: 
 
 men  or  i^entlomon  may  Ix*  (Mjmmissioned  as  rul- 
 ini;  I'ldiTs  in  diUVMcut  i'rcsbytei  ii's,  they  Ijo  cho- 
 sen in  til  it  Picshylcry  in  which  thero  are  fewest 
 ahlr  ministiTs.  'i'hisc  hints  were  ofTertNl  not  as 
 anihni  ii.'ilivc  rules,  hut  as  advices,  as  many  had 
 but  little  knoNvledji^e  of  Piesbyterian  government. 
 While  Sessions  and  Prehyteries  were  busy  pro- 
 motini,^  the  election  of  profier  commissioners, 
 Tliomas  Abernethy,  a  Jesuit,  liaving  heard  at 
 Rome  of  the  wonderful  providences  of  (^od  to- 
 wards his  native  country,  hastened  to  witness 
 them,  and  had  not  been  long  here,  when,  mani- 
 festly persuaded  of  the  truth,  he  was,  \ipon  his 
 earnest  entreaty,  admitted  into  their  church  fel- 
 l()wshi|).  His  deep  marked  repentance  and  con- 
 version, and  his  zeal  for  the  covenant,  not  a  little 
 encouraged  the  covenanters. 
 
 Hamilton  having  reached  the  court,  infi^rmed 
 his  Majesty,  that  lie  durst  n(jt  divulge  his  last  in- 
 structions, lest  he  should  have  thereby  exposed  tiie 
 royal  authority  to  contempt,  and  that  he  could 
 think  ol  nothing  so  apt  to  remove  the  present  jea- 
 lousies of  the  malcontents,  as  an  order  for  the  re- 
 novation of  the  nutlondl  covenant  f)f  1,381,  which 
 contained  a  jiarticular  renunciation  of  Pcpery, 
 the  fears  of  which  had  occasioned  the  malcontents' 
 late  covenant.  Charles  was  heartily  |)rovoked 
 to  find  all  his  stratagems  so  unsuccessful  ;  but, 
 not  being  yet  ready  for  the  open  w  ar  w  hich  he 
 intended,  he  iiiNlrueted  tlieiMar(juisto  prohibit  the 
 litur^j/  and  (y/z/cz/jt,  the  J/io/i  (\)/nni'tssi()ny  and  ob- 
 servance of  the  articles  of  I\rfli  : — to  declare  the 
 admission  of  ininisters  to  their  oflice  j>erfectly 
 free  ;  and  that  bishops  should  be  subject  to  the 
 Assend>ly  ;  and  to  indict  an  Assend)Jy  and  Par- 
 liament as  he  saw   cause,  and   to   rccpiire  all  the 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  159 
 
 subjects  to  subscribe  the  covenant  of  1581,  and 
 bond  of  1589.  Returning  to  Edinburgh,  Hamil- 
 ton read  his  instructions  to  the  privy  council, 
 but  could  not  persuade  them  to  subscribe  the 
 above-mentioned  cownant  and  bond,  till  a  clause 
 was  added,  bearing,  that  they  subscribed  it  accor- 
 ding to  its  original  meaning.  They  declared  their 
 satisfaction  with  his  Majesty's  concessions  ;  and 
 that  all  his  subjects  ought  to  rest  contented  with 
 them  ;  and  promised  to  sacrifice  their  lives  and 
 fortunes  in  executing  them,  and  settling  the  peace 
 of  the  kingdom.  They  issued  a  proclamation  for 
 a  General  Assembly  to  meet  at  Glasgow,  Novem- 
 ber 21st,  and  warned  bishops  and  commissioners 
 to  attend  it ;  and  another  for  a  Parliament  at 
 Edinburgh,  on  the  15th  of  May  next  ensuing, 
 and  warned  the  nobles,  bishops,  barons,  and  com- 
 missioners from  burghs,  to  attend  it.  They 
 commanded  all  the  subjects  to  subscribe  his  Ma- 
 jestifs  covenant  and  bond,  with  all  expedition  ; — 
 and  then  published  his  Majesty's  proclamation. 
 The  covenanters  did  not  think  it  sufficient  for  the 
 redress  of  their  grievances — as  it  did  not  clearly 
 and  distinctly  condemn  the  ijinovations  of  which 
 they  had  complained  ; — it  allowed  the  bishops 
 their  wonted  power,  and  so  called  them  to  their 
 seat  as  judges  in  the  Assembly  and  Parliament. 
 They  largely  exhibited  their  reasons  against  ad- 
 mitting of  any  limitation  of  the  Assembly,  as 
 contrary  to  the  word  of  God,  the  large  Confes- 
 sion of  Faith,  and  book  of  discipline,  their  former 
 contendings,  and  the  ends  of  General  Assemblies, 
 and  to  the  acts  of  the  church,  or  of  Parliament, 
 ratifying  the  liberties  of  that  court.  They  refus- 
 ed to  subscribe  his  Majesty's  coveiiant,  as  they 
 did  not  know  but  therebv  he  intended  to  invali- 
 
IHO  A  COMPKNOIOUS   HISTORY  OF   Till! 
 
 date  and  dis^^raco  thtir  late  bond;  as  such  a  suIj- 
 scriptinn  inii^ht  amount  to  a  takiii;^  of  Clod's  name 
 in  vain,  nuiltiplyini;  oaths  without  necessity;  as 
 it  niii^ht  divide  them  anioni;  thcnisclve?,  and  so 
 involve  thiin  in  perjury;  as  it  uould  import  that 
 their  former  vows  haci  been  rash  and  destitute  of 
 lawful  authority;  as  it  would  expose  them  to  the 
 reiiroaeh  of  ineon>isteney  in  reli<;ion;  as  it  would 
 involve  them  in  an  approbation  of  the  articles  of 
 Pcrthy  their  subseription  answerini;  to  his  Majes- 
 ty's eommand  ;  as  it  mii^'^ht  consist  with  an  ap- 
 probation of  the  liturgy  and  canons;  as  it  import- 
 ed an  unlawful  .£^<)in<^  back  from  truth,  when 
 (iod  was  calling  to  a  steady  adherence  to  it  ;  as 
 it  approved  the  Ring's  proclamation,  and  so  im- 
 ported acquiescence  in  his  pardon  of  their  former 
 proceedings,  which  they  reckoned  their  recjuisite 
 duty  and  glory  ;  and  because  that  part  of  the 
 narrative  of  his  IMajesty's  covenant  was  different 
 from  that  of  1581  ;  and  that  it  contained  no  en- 
 gagement to  practical  reformation  ;  and  because 
 the  counsellors'  subscription  of  it  had  but  tend- 
 ed to  widen  breaches,  instead  of  healing  them. 
 They  farther  protested,  That  the  present  distrac- 
 tions of  church  and  state  were  owing  to  the  no- 
 rations  of  whieh  they  complained  and  not  to  their 
 groundless  fears,  as  the  proclamation  prj^tended ; 
 and  that  all  (piestions  relative  to  the  freedom  of 
 the  Assembly  in  its  constitution,  members,  and 
 points  to  be  judged,  or  form  and  order  of  proce- 
 dure, should  be  left  to  the  determination  of  the 
 As8cml)ly  itself;  that  the  bishops  should  attend 
 it,  nut  as  judges,  but  merely  for  trial  and  censure; 
 and  that,  adhering  to  their  own  late  covenant 
 with  God,  they  ought  not  to  be  charged  to  sub- 
 wribe  any  other,   or   to  procure  subscriptions  to 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  161 
 
 it ;  that  the  subscription  of  his  Majesty's  cove- 
 nant by  the  privy  council,  should  nat  be  preju- 
 dicial to  theirs. — In  this  lon^  protest,  the  cove- 
 nanters had  their  eye  upon  the  proclamation  oC 
 September  9th,  and  the  acts  of  council  complexly 
 taken,  as  they  knew  that  proclamation  was  to  be 
 explained  by  them. 
 
 Notwithstanding-  this  solemn  protest,  Hamilton 
 and  the  privy  council  dispatched  their  commis- 
 sioners, assisted  by  their  missives,  to  procure  sub- 
 scriptions to  his  Majesty's  covenant.  By  extolling 
 his  condescension,  and  the  necessity  and  expedi- 
 ence of  subscribing  it,  these  commissioners  did 
 what  they  could.  Aware  of  this  divisive  mea- 
 sure, the  covenanters  sent  their  deputies  through 
 the  nation,  with  copies  of  their  late  protest  and 
 additional  advices,  warning  their  friends  to  avoid 
 the  snare,  and  in  as  large  numbers  as  they  could, 
 to  read  the  protest,  wherever  the  King's  procla- 
 mation should  be  read.  Where  the  court  com- 
 missioners got  the  start,  chiefly  in  the  counties 
 of  Aberdeen  and  Banff,  in  which  the  Earl  of 
 Huntley  had  remarkable  influence,  they  obtain- 
 ed not  a  few  subscriptions.  About  28,000  in  all, 
 subscribed  it,  more  than  the  half  of  whom  were 
 in  these  two  shires.  In  Aberdeen,  the  doctors 
 would  not  subscribe  it  without  declaring,  that 
 they  understood  it  as  consistent  with  Prelacy 
 and  the  ceremonies.  The  citizens  subscribed  it  in 
 the  same  sense.  Here  the  Lord  and  ]Master  of 
 Forbes,  at  the  hazard  of  their  life,  read  the  pro- 
 test ;  but  the  people  were  generally  too  much 
 overawed  by  Huntley,  and  addicted  to  the  court, 
 and  its  novations,  to  regard  it.  The  inhabitants 
 of  Glasgow,  warmly  urged  by  Hamilton  himself, 
 and  by  Orbiston,  lord  justice  clerk,  were  many 
 
 Y 
 
162  A   ( O.MrKNDIOUS    HI.'5'IOUV   OK   THE 
 
 of  them  on  the  point  of  subscribing^ ;  but,  having 
 jj^ot  sonic  time  to  think  on  it,  their  scruples  in- 
 creased, and  few  complied. 
 
 While  the  court  laboured  to  have  all  the  ma- 
 ojstrates  of  burghs  to  their  mind,  the  elections 
 for  the  Assembly  went  almost  every  where  in  fa- 
 vours of  the  covenanters.  Part  of  the  Presbytery 
 of  (ilasgow,  for  a  time,  opposed  the  election  of 
 any  ruling  ciders  lo  represent  them.  lUit  the 
 reasonings  of  Lord  Loudon,  and  of  Messrs  D. 
 Dickson,  R.  Blair,  and  .1.  Bonner  removed  most 
 of  their  scruples.  As  there  were  no  judicatories 
 hut  Presbyteries,  at  the  time,  for  citing  the  bi- 
 vhops  to  take  their  trial  at  the  Assembly  ;  and  as 
 the  King  had  called  them  up  as  judges,  and  his 
 commissioner  refused  warrants  to  cite  them  as 
 pannels,  the  covenanters  first  drew  up  a  libel 
 against  them  all,  in  which  they  accused  them  of 
 their  common  faults,  transgression  of  the  caveats 
 established  by  the  Assembly  1600; — behaving 
 themselves  in  a  lordly  manner  ; — pul)licly  teach- 
 ing, conniving  at,  or  countenancing  Popish  and 
 Anninian  errors.  To  these  they  subjoined  char- 
 ges of  drunkenness,  whoredom,  playing  at  cards 
 ami  dice,  proiane  swearing,  bribery,  simony,  ly- 
 ing, dishonesty  in  civil  bargains,  and  the  like,  to 
 be  applied  to  particulars  as  they  deserved.  Ele- 
 ven noblemen,  thirty- one  barons  and  gentlemen, 
 five  nunisters,  and  six  burghers  and  commons,  in 
 name  of  the  covenanters  that  were  not  chosen 
 nH'ml)ers  of  the  Assenddy,  were  appointed  to  pro- 
 secute them  btfore  the  Presbyteries  where  they 
 resided;  and  to  add  to  the  general  libel  what 
 other  partieular  crimes  they  could  prove  against 
 them.  1  he  Presbyteries,  according  to  the  advice 
 "f  the  'J'ables,  referred  the  matter  to  the  Assem- 
 
 7 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  16'3 
 
 biy,  and  appointed  the  libel,  with  a  citation  of 
 them  to  the  Assembly,  to  be  read  from  every  pul- 
 pit within  the  bounds  of  the  Presbyteries  con- 
 cerned. Many  processes  were  also  commenced 
 against  scandalous  ministers,  part  of  which  were 
 referred  to  the  Assembly. 
 
 The  Tables  farther  advised,  That  all  the  no- 
 blemen  who  had  subscribed  their  covenant,  should 
 meet  at  Glasgow  on  the  Saturday  before  the  As- 
 sembly ;  that  every  ruling  elder  chosen  for  the 
 Assembly,  should  bring  along  with  him  four  gen- 
 tlemen as  his  assistants,  whom  he  might  consult 
 in  difficult  cases  ;  that  each  burgh  should  send  up 
 from  two  to  six  of  their  most  judicious  member.^ 
 for  the  same  purpose ;  that  according  to  his  JNIa- 
 jesty's  proclamation,  the  first  Lord's  day  of  No- 
 vember should  be  spent  in  solemn  fasting  in  con- 
 gregations, for  the  Lord's  direction,  before  mini- 
 sters set  off;  that  congregations  take  care  that 
 no  minister  be  hindered  from  attendance,  for  want 
 of  necessary  charges ;   that  such  as  had  been  de- 
 coyed or  compelled  to  subscribe  the  Ring's  cove- 
 nant, declare  the  same  in  writing,  or  before  their 
 sessions.     To  prevent  a  numerous  attendance  of 
 the  covenanters  at  the  Assembly,  which  might  at 
 once  protect  and  encourage  their  friends,  Hamii^ 
 ton  and  his  party  did  what  they  could,  prohibit- 
 ing every  person  concerned  to  bring  in  any  with 
 him  but  his   own   family   and   ordinary  retinue. 
 But  the  covenanters  protested,  That  all  should 
 have  liberty  to  attend,  who  had  interest  as  par- 
 ties, witnesses,  judges,  or  assessors;  and  that  all 
 might  come  with  such  retinue  as  the  privy  coun- 
 sellors should  give  example  of.     Traquair  adivs- 
 ed  to  put  as  many  of  the  covenanters  as  possible 
 to  the  horn,  for  not  paying  their  taxes  or  debts- 
 
i^M.         A  ( o.Mrr.NDiOLis  iiistouy  of  thk 
 
 some  oi'  tliLin  a  few  days  before  the  niectini,^  of 
 the  Asscml)Iy.  i>iit  they  encountered  this  stra- 
 tagem with  such  a  spirited  remonstrance,  as 
 ohMiTciI  the  Manjuis  and  council  to  drop  it. 
 
 When  the  Lords  of  Session  met  at  I'kiinlnir^h 
 on  the  first  day  of  November,  Hamilton  required 
 them  to  subscri!)e  liis  Majesty's  covenant,  inti- 
 mating, that  ids  declared  nieaninfr  of  it  was  con- 
 sistent with  all  the  novations  introduced  into  the 
 church  since  1.580.  Hut,  after  a  debate  of  three 
 hours,  only  nine  of  them  would  subscribe  it.  The 
 Lords  Dury,  Craii^hall,  Scotstarvet,  and  Inner- 
 teil,  refused,  and  j)rotested.  Hamilton  declared 
 in  the  privy  council,  that  it  was  his  ^Tajcsty's 
 pleasure,  that  Episcopacy  might  be  limited,  but 
 not  that  it  should  be  abolished  ;  and  therefore 
 uri^ed  them  to  a|)[)rove  it,  as  a  mean  of  deterring 
 the  Assembly  from  presuming  to  condemn  it. 
 But  vSir  Thomas  Hope,  lord  advocate,  so  vigor- 
 ously opposed  this  motion  in  a  paj)er  which  he 
 sent  to  the  council,  that  it  miscarried.  Hamilton, 
 almost  infuriated,  charged  vSir  Thomas  to  repair 
 to  (ylasgow,  and  there  defend  Episcopacy  for  liis 
 royal  master,  as  he  should  answer  at  his  peril. 
 But  Sir  Thomas  declined  it,  as  a  piece  of  service 
 for  which  he  could  not  answer  to  (^od  and  his 
 conscience.  Uj)on  which  Hamilton  prohibited 
 him  to  go  to  that  place  at  all.  While  the  cove- 
 nanters were  spending  tlie  4th  and  some  follow- 
 ing days  of  November  in  solemn  fasting  and 
 prayer  for  direction  in,  and  ble-sing  on,  the  en- 
 suing Assembly,  as  Charles  had  appotnicd  them, 
 liis  (hsigu  of  making  war  upon  them,  and  forcing 
 ihcm  III  submit  to  his  impositions,  became  more 
 and  more  manifest.  The  ]:nglish  arrested  the 
 Scotch   horses  that   were   in   their  countrv  :   but 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  165 
 
 this  was  got  compromised.  Their  ships  were 
 stopped  and  searched  by  his  command,  pro])ably 
 in  order  to  apprehend  General  Lcsly  in  his  return 
 from  Sweden.  The  command  of  the  castle  of 
 Edinburgh  was  taken  from  the  Earl  of  Mar,  and 
 given  to  Ruthven,  a  trusty  royalist.  Prepara- 
 tions were  made  for  the  fortification  of  Berwick, 
 Carlisle,  he. 
 
 Archbishop  Spotswood  had  advised  to  hold  this 
 Assembly  at  Aberdeen,  to  which  the  old,  and 
 most  able  and  trusty  covenanters  could  not  have 
 travelled  in  the  winter  season,  and  where  the 
 learned  doctors  of  both  universities  were  lo  op- 
 pose them,  and  the  Karl  of  Huntley  could  have 
 suddenly  raised  several  thousands  of  bloody  men 
 to  overawe  or  suppress  them.  But  Providence 
 directed  Hamilton  to  fix  upon  Glasgow,  where 
 no  doubt  he  hoped  that  himself  would  have  no 
 small  influence.  The  Assembly  met  on  the  day 
 appointed,  Nov.  21st,  1638,  and  consisted  of  140 
 ministers  from  58  Presbyteries,  and  95  ruling 
 elders,  and  2  from  the  universities.  Never  had 
 our  church  or  Assembly,  in  which  solid  sense, 
 strict  piety,  bold  and  prudent  zeal,  and  divine  di- 
 rection, so  remarkably  appeared.  After  spend- 
 ing part  of  the  first  day  in  solemn  prayer  and  fast- 
 ing, and  reading  of  his  Majesty's  letter  appointing 
 the  Marquis  of  Hamilton  his  Commissioner,  they 
 proceeded  to  the  choice  of  their  Moderator.  Ha- 
 milton, Traquair,  and  liCvvis  Stewart,  who  acted 
 as  King's  advocate,  vehemently  pled,  that  the 
 commissions  of  the  members  should  be  first  tried, 
 that  so  it  might  appear  vvho  had  right  to  vote  in 
 the  election.  But  Rothes  and  I^oudon,  with 
 Messrs.  Dickson,  Henderson,  and  William  Li- 
 vingston o])pnsed  them  with  equal  zeal  and  ^\\\w- 
 
106'  A   COMIM-NDIOI'S    HISTORY   OF   THE 
 
 rior  strciii^tli  of  ari;iinuMit.  I'liey  pled,  That  it 
 bud  \)vvii  i\ic  ((Histant  practice  fust  to  choose  the 
 Moderator ;  that  such  respect  was  due  to  com- 
 missions, the  most  of  which  were,  doubtles,  va- 
 lid, as  entitled  them  to  vote  in  the  ( hoice  of  a 
 Moderator,  that  so  the  j)romiscuous  meetini^ 
 mii^ht  he  gradually  foriiu'd  into  an  Assembly 
 instructed  witii  re«^ular  commissions;  that  it  he- 
 Kings  to  the  freedom  of  an  Assembly,  that  com- 
 missioners choose  their  iModerator  immediately 
 after  the  exhibition  of  their  commissi(jn,  lest  any 
 thing  be  irregularly  transacted  in  their  presence 
 without  their  consent ;  that,  in  their  suj)plica- 
 tions,  they  had  insisted,  that  the  matter  and  man- 
 ner of  assembling  should  be  judged  by  the  As- 
 send)ly  itself,  which  cannot  be  done  till  the  Mo- 
 derator be  chosen  ;  and  that  it  would  be  a  wrong- 
 ing of  the  churches,  which  had  sent  up  these 
 commissioners,  not  to  suifer  them  to  embody 
 themselves  in  an  orderly  manner. 
 
 At  last,  after  advising  witii  the  privy  counsel- 
 lors, thelNIarquis  permitted  them  to  choose  their 
 Moderator ; — but  protested,  That  this  should 
 not  import  his  ap[)robation  of  any  commission 
 which  he  should  lind  ground  to  exce|)t  against  ; 
 and  that  the  choice  of  the  Moderator  should  not 
 prejudge  the  bishops  of  any  oHice  or  dignity  be- 
 longing to  them.  \n  opposition  to  this,  llothes, 
 in  name  of  the  commissioners,  j)rotested.  That 
 the  Manjuis's  protestation  shouhl  no  wise  hurt 
 any  law  fid  commission  to  be  produced,  or  mar 
 the  freedom  of  the  Assembly,  which  was  to  be 
 fenced  in  the  name  of  the  Son  of  (iod;  and  that 
 no  protest  in  favours  of  the  bishops  coultl  be  ail- 
 initled,  till  both  they  and  tluir  claims  were  tried 
 and  allou  til.    Lord  Montgomery,  in  name  of  the 
 
CHURCH  OP  SCOTLAND.  167 
 
 prosecutors  of  the  bishops,  protested,  that  tlie 
 Marquis's  protestation  should  not  hinder  the  dis- 
 cussion of  their  libel  ae^ainst  them.  Hamilton 
 then  pled,  that  a  declinature  which  he  had  receiv- 
 ed from  the  bishops,  should  be  immediately  read. 
 This  being  refused,  he  insisted,  that  six  privy- 
 counsellors  should  be  allowed  to  vote  as  his  as- 
 sessors, according  as  they  had  been  directed  in 
 his  Majesty's  letter ; — which  was  also  refused. 
 After  both  sides  became  weary  of  altercation  and 
 protestation,  they  proceeded  to  the  choice  of  their 
 Moderator.  Mr.  Bell,  an  old  minister  of  the  place, 
 who  had  opened  the  Assembly  as  Moderator  pro 
 temp,  taking  care  to  put  none  other  on  the  leet 
 but  such  as  were  too  infirm,  beside  the  celebrat- 
 ed Mr.  Alexander  Henderson,  he  was  unani- 
 mously chosen,  who  having  anew  constituted  the 
 court  with  prayer,  made  an  handsome  speech  for 
 the  direction  and  encouragement  of  his  brethren. 
 Next  day  the  Marquis,  supported  by  Traquair 
 and  Lewis  Stewart,  again  unsuccessfully  insisted 
 for  the  votes  of  the  assessors,  which  issued  in  his 
 new  protest  against  the  denial,  and  a  counter- 
 protest  by  Loudon  in  name  of  the  commissioners 
 to  the  Assembly.  For  refusing  Hamilton's  de- 
 mand, it  was  pled,  That  the  Assembly  was  an  ec- 
 clesiastical meeting  of  ecclesiastical  rulers ;  that 
 no  political  preses  had  any  vote  in  the  ancient 
 councils;  that  in  the  thirty-nine  first  General  As- 
 semblies of  this  church,  there  was  not  so  much  as 
 a  King's  Commissioner  present ;  that  after  one 
 was  introduced,  he  never  had  more  than  one  vote; 
 that  Hamilton's  commission  empowered  none 
 but  himself;  that  as  he  represented  his  Majesty, 
 the  voting  of  assessors  along  with  him  as  his  equals, 
 would  derogate  from  theroyal  dignity ;  that  thougli 
 
J  68  A   roMl'KNDlOUS   Ulbl'OliY  OK   THK 
 
 assessors  had  a  power  of  reasoning,  it  behoved  to 
 he  only  after  the  reasonin;^  of  members,  and  in 
 the  way  of  proposing  doubts. 
 
 The  election  of  a  clerk  coming  next  upon  the 
 carpet,  Hamilton  insisted,  that  Thos.  Sandilands 
 should  officiate  for  his  aged  father  James,  who 
 had  been  chosen  by  the  Assembly  1616*.  But 
 the  votes  carried  it  almost  unanimously  in  fa- 
 vours of  Archibald  Johnston,  advocate,  who,  for 
 almost  two  years,  had  faithfully  served  the  cove- 
 nanters without  any  reward.  Upon  inijuiry  for 
 the  registers  of  former  Assemblies,  Sandilands 
 delivered  up  two  volumes,  which  contained,  at 
 least,  part  of  the  acts  between  1,090  and  1610, 
 together  with  the  minutes  of  1616,  1617,  and 
 1618,  signed  by  Ids  father.  As  soon  as  it  ap- 
 peared, that  no  other  mendjer  knew  where  any 
 more  could  be  had,  Johnston,  their  clerk,  present- 
 ed four  vcdumes,  which  contained  all  the  acts 
 from  1560  to  1.390,  exce{)t  about  twenty  leaves, 
 which  had  been  villainously  cut  out  by  Archbishop 
 Adamson,  together  with  another  volume,  which 
 contained  the  acts  of  that  whole  period,  some- 
 what abridged.  A  committee  was  aj)p(Mnted  to 
 examine  these  books  ;  and  upon  an  exhibition  of 
 nineteen  marks  of  their  genuineness,  the  Assem- 
 bly sustained  them  as  authentic  registers.  Mr. 
 William  Scot  of  Cupar,  afterward  produced 
 another  copy  of  these  old  minutes. 
 
 Notwithstanding  the  ^lanjuis's  earnest  strug- 
 gle to  have  the  bishops'  didlnaturc  first  received, 
 the  Ass('nd)ly  proceeded  to  examine  controvert- 
 ed commissions  ;  and  rejected  such  as  pr(jceeded 
 on  irregular  election,  or  that  were  not  rightly  at- 
 tested. The  bishops'  dcdinaturc  of  the  Assembly 
 was  then  read  bv  Dr.  Hamilton  of  Glassford  theiV 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  16fl 
 
 procurator.  In  it  they  protested,  That  the  meet- 
 ing was  unlawful,  and  all  its  proceedings  null  and 
 void,  because  most,  if  not  all,  the  commissioners 
 to  it  had  been  chosen  before  his  majesty  had  in- 
 dicted it ;  and  that  the  clerical  commissioners  to 
 it  were  not  qualified  according  to  law,  having 
 never  subscribed  the  Confession  of  faith,  in  the 
 presence  of  their  bishops,  nor  sworn  the  oaths  of 
 fidelity  and  supremacy, — nay,  had  refused  to  sub- 
 scribe the  Confession  of  Faith  or  covenant,  as  re- 
 quired by  his  Majesty  in  September ;  and  that 
 they  had  seditiously  impugned  the  dignities  and 
 privileges  of  bishops,  who  were  an  Estate  in  Par- 
 liament;  that  they  had  their  commission  from 
 Presbyteries,  which  had  deposed  their  proj)er,  z.  e. 
 constant  moderators,  and  elected  others  in  their 
 stead  ;  that  they  had  been  chosen  by  lay  elders  ; 
 that  they  had  seditiously  opposed  the  order  of  the 
 king  and  authority  of  the  church,  and  so  are  dis- 
 qualified to  sit  in  any  ecclesiastical  court ;  that 
 they  allowed  of  lay  elders  voting  in  the  Assem- 
 bly ; — and  that  most,  if  not  all,  of  the  members 
 had  pre-condemned  Episcopacy  and  the  articles 
 of  Perth,  and,  by  their  covenant,  had  bound 
 themselves  to  oppose  them  ;  that  by  their  calum- 
 nies and  libels,  they  had  made  themselves  parties 
 in  the  cause  of  the  bishops  ;  that  they  had  ex- 
 cluded all  the  bishops  from  sitting  in  the  Assem- 
 bly, unless  they  were  deputed  to  it  by  Presbyte- 
 ries ;  that  they  had  deprived  primate  Spotswood 
 of  his  privilege  of  moderatorship,  and  thrust  one 
 chosen  by  Presbyteries  and  laymen  into  his  place. 
 In  fine,  they  pretended,  that  it  was  altogether 
 absurd  for  Presbyters  and  much  more  for  lay  el- 
 ders, to  judge  diocesan  superiors.  The  Assem- 
 bly   prepared    their    answers    to    these    reasons 
 
J  70  A    rOMPKNllIOUS   HISTORY   (»K   TUF 
 
 iinuinst  next  s(*Jt'riint,  in  which  they  maniftsted 
 iheahsolutc  falsohuocl  ol'  some,  and  the  weakness 
 ot'  others. 
 
 After  a  tidioiis  (lisj)ute  with  Dr.  Baleancjuel, 
 whom  the  manjuis  hail  brou;;ht  alun^;  with  him 
 for  an  assistant  ;  and  when  the  Assembly  was 
 proecedin;;  to  vote,  whether  tliey  had  power  to 
 judi;e  tlie  hisljops,  notwithstanding  their  cU'cli- 
 naturi\  Hamilton  <^ave  in  a  written  declaration, 
 in  iiis  Majesty's  name,  wiiieh  seemed  to  i^rant 
 not  a  litth'  redress;  hut  really  bore,  that  every 
 thinf;  should  be  left  to  the  king's  will,  and  that 
 the  Assembly  had  no  proper  power  to  judf^e  of 
 any  thing,  nor  the  church  any  security  for  any 
 thing.  To  this  the  moderator  made  an  hand- 
 some reply,  in  which  he  thanked  his  majesty  for 
 what  kindness  he  had  shewed,  and  pointed  out 
 what  power  civil  magistrates  have  with  respect 
 to  the  church  and  her  Assemblies.  As  they  per- 
 ceived the  Marquis  intent  upon  breaking  with, 
 and  leaving  them,  they  were  at  great  pains  to  ob- 
 viate his  pretended  scruples  with  respect  to  their 
 commission,  the  freedom  of  their  election,  the 
 conduct  of  the  Tables^  and  the  power  of  ruling 
 elders.  They  shewed  him  the  impropriety  of 
 allowing  advocates  to  plead  the  cause  of  the  bi- 
 shops at  their  bar,  as  it  was  contrary  to  the  na- 
 ture of  ecclesiastical  courts,  was  not  allowed  in 
 privy  council,  and  had  been  refused  by  the  As- 
 sembly ITi'iCj.  But  nothing  could  retain  him. 
 After  repeatedly  declaring,  that  he  would  not 
 suffer  them  to  Judge  the  bishops,  he,  in  his  own 
 and  their  name,  protested,  that  no  act  of  the  As- 
 sembly shoidd  be  binding  on  any  of  the  subjects  ; 
 and  in  hisMajesty's  named  issolved  their  meeting, 
 and  prohibited  them  to  proceed  to  any  business  ; 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  171 
 
 but  whether  under  any  penalty,  none  of  my  cre- 
 dible vouchers  inform.  Rothes  protested  against 
 the  dissolution  of  the  Assembly  ;  and  that  they 
 could  not  dissolve  it,  till  their  work  was  finished, 
 as  it  had  been  called  by  his  majesty,  and  consti- 
 tuted according  to  the  word  of  God ;  as  his  ma- 
 jesty's commissioner  had  acknowledged  it  a  law- 
 ful court,  and  sat  seven  days  in  it  and  exhibited 
 his  majesty's  declaration  to  be  registered  in  the 
 minutes  of  it ;  that  the  continuance  of  it  v/as  ne- 
 cessary for  the  many  reasons  contained  in  their 
 former  supplications  for  it ;  that  their  covenant 
 bound  them  to  maintain  the  privileges  which 
 Christ  had  left  to  his  church  ;  that  according  to 
 the  laws  of  this  church  and  kingdom,  neither  the 
 king  nor  his  commissioner  have  power  to  dissolve 
 a  General  Assembly  ;  that  the  Assembly  had 
 formerly  sitten,  notwithstanding  contrary  require- 
 ments of  court ;  that  to  dissolve  now,  after  so 
 much  preparation  and  progress  towards  redress 
 of  grievances,  without  finishing  their  work,  would 
 offend  God,  and  increase  their  misery  ;  that  it 
 was  absolutely  necessary  to  explain  the  meaning 
 of  the  national  covenant  subscribed  in  1581,  and 
 1590  ;  and  therefore  he  protested,  That  the  As- 
 sembly had  full  power  to  continue  and  discuss 
 the  whole  business  for  which  it  had  convened. 
 Messrs.  Henderson,  Dickson,  and  others,  by  their 
 sensible  and  affectionate  speeches,  encouraged  their 
 brethren  to  adhere  to  their  duty,  and  shew  them- 
 selves as  faithful  to  Christ  as  the  Commissioner 
 had  done  himself  to  his  king's  command.  Deep- 
 ly affected  hereby,  Lord  Erskine,  son  to  the  Earl 
 of  Mar,  with  tears  begged  the  Assembly's  allow- 
 ance to  subscribe  their  covenant.  Messrs.  For- 
 bes and  iM'Kail  ministers,  hitcly  come  from  Hoi- 
 
175  A   COMPENDlOUb   HISTORY  OF   TIIK 
 
 land,  rulloued  his  exainj)lc.  Kncourag'ed  by  this, 
 and  conscious  of  their  duty,  the  whole  Assem- 
 hly,  cxcc])t  four  or  five,  by  a  vote,  promised  to 
 continue  sittin^^  at  all  hazard,  till  their  business 
 should  be  finished  :  and  immediately  after,  by 
 another  vote,  sustained  themselves  lawful  and 
 comj)ctent  judi^es  of  the  bisho|)s,  notwithstand- 
 ing^ their  declinature  and  protestation. 
 
 Next  day,  November  29th,  a  proclamation 
 subscribed  by  the  ^lanjuis  and  most  of  the  privy 
 counsellors  was  published  over  the  cross  of  Glas- 
 gow, prohibiting  all  the  members  of  the  Assem- 
 bly, under  pain  of  high  treason,  to  meet  or  judge 
 any  thing  further  ;  and  charging  them  to  leave 
 (rlasgow  within  twenty-four  hours  ;  and  declar- 
 ing, that  all  their  acts  and  deeds  posterior  to 
 yesterday's  dissolutions  should  be  held  null  and 
 void;  and  prohibiting  the  subjects  to  regard  or 
 obey  the  same.  In  answer  to  this,  Archibald 
 .lohnson.  Lord  Krskine  and  others,  read  the  pro- 
 testation, which  Rothes  had  given  in  the  day  be- 
 fore, as  the  mind  of  the  court.  And  further  pro- 
 tested, that  they  and  their  brethren  had  no  dis- 
 loyal designs;  that  all  ecclesiastical  causes  of  ge- 
 neral concern  ought  to  be  discussed,  and  the 
 j)eace  of  the  church  fully  settled,  and  its  peace 
 i\Ui\  order  re-established,  before  the  Commission- 
 ers depart ;  that  if  the  JMarquis  would  leave  the 
 church  and  kingdom  in  such  disorder,  it  should 
 1)1'  lawful  for  them  to  continue  sitting  till  they 
 had  finished  their  work;  that  this  Assemblyshould 
 be  held  lawful,  and  its  dveiU  of  eijual  ibice  with 
 those  of  other  free  General  Assemblies;  that  no 
 bad  coiibicjuenccs  ensuing  upon  the  hindering  or 
 molesting  of  the  freedom  of  this  Assemblv  should 
 be  imputed  tn  tlinn,  but  to  the  bad  advice  ol  the 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  1  T5 
 
 bishops;  on  accountof  which,  they  are  hereby  again 
 summoned  to  attend  the  Assembly,  hear  proof  led, 
 and  sentencepassed  upon  themaccordingto  justice. 
 In  fine,  they  protested  their  adherence  to  all  their 
 former  protestations,  and  left  room  for  extending 
 their  paper  or  reasons,  as  they  should  find  neces- 
 sary for  vindicating  their  procedure. 
 
 After  the  hurry  of  the  proclamation,  the  As- 
 sembly met,  and  the  Moderator  recommended  to 
 them,  as  in  the  sight  of  God,  to  behave  them- 
 selves in  the  most  pious,  prudent,  peaceable,  and 
 orderly    manner,    answerable   to    their   circum- 
 stances.    Lord  Lorn,  i.  e,  Argyle,  came  back, 
 and  being  desired  by  the  Moderator  to  counte- 
 nance them,   and  witness  the  rectitude  of  their 
 procedure,    he  promised   to   do   so,  and  begged 
 them  to  proceed  wisely,  with  the  utmost  defe- 
 rence due  to  their  Sovereign.     Some   at   first 
 looked  upon  him  as  a  court  spy  and  check  upon 
 them;  but  it  soon  appeared,  that  he  acted  from 
 an  hearty  love  to  Christ  and  his  cause.     About 
 the  same  time,  the  Earls  of  Wigton,  Kinghorn, 
 Galloway,  Mar,  and  Lord  Napier,  privy  counsel- 
 lors, joined  the  covenanters,  which  not  a  little 
 encouraged  the  Assembly.     To  wipe  off  the  re- 
 proaches which  had  been  cast  upon  them,  in  the 
 bishops'  declinature,  Messrs.  Blair,  Livingston, 
 Hamilton,  and  M'Lellan,  who  had  been  driven 
 from  Ireland,  shewed  that  it  had  been  merely  for 
 their  adherence  to  the  doctrine,  worship,  disci- 
 pline, and  government  of  the  church,  sworn  to  in 
 the  late  covenant.     And  Messrs.  Dickson,  Ru- 
 therford, and  the  Laird  of  Earlstoun,  who  had 
 been  censured  by  the  High  Commission,  repre- 
 sented their  case  to  the  full  satisfaction  of  the 
 >vhole  Assembly.     On  that  day,  and  the  next, 
 
Ifi-  A   CDMf ENDIOCS    HISTORY  OP  THE 
 
 committees  were  appointed  to  incjuire  into  the 
 ori^^inal  sense  of  the  national  covenant ; — to  pre- 
 pare matters  for  the  trial  of  the  bishops  ; — to  con- 
 hiiler  the  new  liturgy  and  canons  ; — and  to  form 
 an  act  nullilyint,^  the  Assemblies  IGOG — 1G18. 
 
 After  the  Moderator  liad  largely  shewed  the 
 intrinsic  power  of  the  church,  particularly  in  ad- 
 ininisterin<i^  discipline  to  her  scandalous  members, 
 and  IMessrs.  Dickson  and  Ramsay  had  shewed  the 
 error  and  wickedness  of  the  Arminian  tenets,  the 
 Assembly  proceeded  to  discuss  some  cases  of  scan- 
 dal, which  had  been  referred  to  them.  INIr.  Mit- 
 chel  bein^;'  proved  charj^eable  with  Arminian  er- 
 rors, and  f^loryin^  in  them  ;  and  with  procuring 
 an  order  by  the  !)ishops'  means  for  stopping  his 
 trial  bef(^re  his  Presbytery  ;  and  with  declining 
 this  Assembly,  was  deposed  and  excommunicated. 
 J)r.  Panther  being  proved  guilty  of  approaches 
 towards  the  Popish  doctrine  of  justification  by 
 works,  and  towards  the  Pelagian,  in  denying  ori- 
 ginal sin,  and  of  propagating  Arminian  errors, 
 was  referred  to  a  committee,  which  deposed  him. 
 Dr.  (Jladstones,  being  proved  guilty  of  drunken- 
 ness and  Atheistical  profaneness,  was  deposed. 
 AVhcn  the  trial  of  the  I)isho[)3  came  on,  it  was 
 proved  against  them  all.  That  they  had  tram- 
 pled on  the  Caveats  of  the  Assembly  1600; — 
 had  accepted  consecration  to  their  Episcopal  of- 
 fice; and  oppressed  the  church  with  innovations. 
 A^'ainst  Spotswood  Archbishop,  of  St.  Andrew's, 
 »t  was  further  proved,  that  he  had  been  an  ordi- 
 nary profaner  of  the  Lord's  day,  playing  at  cards 
 or  dire  111  tiu..  time  of  public  worship,  or  riding 
 throu;;li  the  country  the  whole  day;  that  he  some- 
 tim<'!<sattippli„jri,;  taverns  till  muinight;  that  he 
 had  falsified  the  acts  of  the  Aberdeen  Assemblv; 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  ]  7.5 
 
 and  was  an  avowed  reproacher  of  our  old  Assem- 
 blies and  national  covenant ;  and  it  was  further 
 undertaken  to  prove  him  guilty  of  adultery,  sacri- 
 lege,  and  frequent  simony.  Against  S)'dseif  of 
 Galloway,  it  was  proved,  that  he  had  taught  Ar- 
 minian  errors ;  that  he  had  kept  a  crucifix  in  his 
 closet,  and  defended  the  use  of  it  from  his  own 
 comfortable  experience  ;  that,  at  his  own  hand, 
 he  had  appointed  two  anniversary  fasts  in  his  dio- 
 cese ;  that,  at  his  Synod,  he  had  compelled  mini- 
 sters  to  receive  the  communion  upon  their  knees; 
 that,  for  mere  non-conformity  to  novatiojis,  he 
 had  deposed  and  procured  the  banishment  of  the 
 most  eminent  ministers,  and  had  confined  or  fin- 
 ed sundry  gentlemen  ;  that  he  had  shewed  kind- 
 ness to  excommunicated  Papists ;  that  he  had 
 condemned  family  prayers;  that  he  had  profaned 
 the  Lord's  day,  buying  horses,  and  transacting 
 other  secular  business  on  it.  Against  Whiteford 
 of  Brichen,  it  was  proved,  that  he  had  been  guilty 
 of  several  acts  of  adultery  and  excessive  drink- 
 ing;  that  he  had  used  a  crucifix  in  his  closet; 
 that  he  had  preached  Arminian  and  Popish  er- 
 rors ;  and  that  he  was  generally  infamous  for  se- 
 veral other  crimes.  Against  Lindsay  of  Edin- 
 burgh, it  was  proved,  that  he  had  violently  urged 
 the  late  innovations;  that  he  had  refused  to  "ad- 
 mit such  to  the  ministry  as  would  not  first  take 
 the  order  of  preaching  deacons ;  that  he  used  to 
 bow  towards  the  altar,  and  wear  the  rochet ;  that 
 he  had  domineered  over  Presbyteries,  allowed 
 clandestine  marriages,  and  countenanced  corrupt 
 doctrines  ;  that  he  had  lifed  up  the  elements  in 
 the  Lord's  supper  at  the  consecration,  and  labour- 
 ed to  prove  that  Christ's  manhood  was  omnipre- 
 sent.    He  might  also  have  been  proved  guilty  of 
 
J  7^5  A    COMPKNDIOi;>    HFSTORV   OF  TlIF? 
 
 profane  cursinp^  and  swearing,  and  of  avowed  ne- 
 glect of  lecUiriiii;.     A;;ainst  Hallantyne  of  Aber- 
 deen,  were  proved  frecpient  acts  of  simony,  vio- 
 lent pressin^;^  of  tlie  iUur<rii  and  canons^  suspend- 
 ine^  of  ministers    for  fastinc^  on  the  T^ord's  day, 
 anci  ordcrini;  all  fasts  to  ht*  held  on  Wednesdays: 
 and  that  he  had,  in  the  Popish  manner,  consecrat- 
 ed the  (  hapel  of  the  infamous  Lady  of  Wardhouse; 
 nnci    that   he   had  stopped  processes  ai^'ainst  Pa- 
 pists and  incestuous   persons.      Ag^ainst  Maxwel 
 of  Ross,  it  was  [)roved,  that  he  had  publicly  read 
 the  litur^ry  in  his  own  house  and  cathedral ;  that 
 he   bowed   towards    the   altar;   that   he  deposed 
 faithful  ministers,  and  admitted  known  fornica- 
 tors to  the  Lord's  table  ;  that   he  was  a  familiar 
 companion  of  Papists,  and  an  ordinary  player  of 
 cards  and  dice  on  the  Lord's  day,  and  once  upon 
 a  communion  Sabbath  ;    that  he  had  often  admi- 
 nistered Popish  absolution   to  sick  persons;  that 
 he  had  consecrated  ])reachin«»-  deacons  ;    that  he 
 had  robbed  his  vassals   of  above  40,000  merks  ; 
 that   he  kept    superstitious    fasts  every  Friday; 
 that  he  ordinarily  set  off  on  his  journeys  on  the 
 Lord's  day;  and  that  he  had  been  a  principal  in- 
 strument of  all  the  trouble  which  liad  lately  be- 
 fallen the  church  and  nation.     Against  Wedder- 
 born  of  Dumblane  it  was  proved,  that  he  had  been 
 a  princij)al  compiler  of  the  lilurgj/,  and  practiser 
 and  urger  of  it,   and  other  i?inovatiofis ;  that  he 
 had  been  an  assistant  of  Archbishop  Laud,  and  a 
 propa^rator  of  Arminian    errors.      Against  Lind- 
 i»«»y,  archbishop  of  (ilasgow,   it  was  proved,  that 
 he  had  urged  ministers  to  observe  the  liturgi/  and 
 canons  under  pain    of  horning;    that  he  had  op- 
 pressed his  ( lergy  with    his    exactions,    and  kept 
 some  of  them  altogothcr  out   of  their  stipends  ; 
 5 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  177 
 
 that  he  had  sold  the  office  of  commissary ;  that 
 he  had  greatly  oppressed  his  vassals ;  and  that 
 he  had  imposed  oaths  of  his  own  invention  up. 
 on  candidates  for  the  ministry.  These  eight 
 were  deposed  from  all  power  in  the  church,  and 
 summarily  excommunicated,  and  delivered  over 
 to  Satan.  Against  Graham  of  Orkney  it  was  prov- 
 ed, that  he  had  tyrannically  domineered  over  his 
 clergy;  that  he  had  openly  profaned  the  Lord's 
 day  by  curling  on  the  ice  ;  that  he  had  dilapi- 
 dated part  of  the  ecclesiastical  revenues  to  his 
 friends ;  that  he  overlooked  adulterers  and  char- 
 mers ;  that  he  neglected  preaching  himself,  and 
 withheld  from  ministers  a  part  of  their  stipends 
 for  the  building  of  his  cathedral.  Against  Guth- 
 ry  of  Murray  it  was  proved,  that  he  had  avow- 
 ed conformity  to  the  English  Popish  ceremonies; 
 that  at  his  daughter's  marriage  he  had  danced  in 
 his  shirt ;  that  he  had  conveyed  some  women 
 barefooted  to  a  chapel,  in  order  to  do  Popish  pen- 
 ance ;  that  he  ordinarily  rode  about  on  the 
 Lord's  day,  and  had  said,  that  he  would  borrow 
 a  part  of  that  from  God,  and  make  it  up  some 
 other  way.  Against  Fairly  of  Argyle,  it  was 
 proved,  that  he  had  urged  wicked  oaths  upon 
 entrants  to  the  ministry,  and  the  observance  of 
 the  liturgy ;  that  he  had  oppressed  his  vassals  ; 
 and  that  he  had  preached  Arminian  errors,  and 
 had  profaned  the  Lord's  day.  These  three,  to- 
 gether with  Campbell  of  the  Isles,  were  deposed 
 from  all  power  and  function  in  the  church,  with 
 certification,  that  they  should  be  excommunicat- 
 ed if  they  did  not  speedily  manifest  their  repent- 
 ance. Lindsay  of  Dunkeld,  and  Abernethy  of 
 Caithness,  though  little  better  than  their  bre- 
 thren, having  submitted  themselves  to  the  As- 
 
 2   A 
 
178  A   COMFKNDIOUS   HISTORV  OF   THK 
 
 sembly,  were  only  deposed  from  their  pretended 
 power  of  ruling  over  other  ministers,  and  repre- 
 senting the  church  in  I\'nliament,  and  suspended 
 from  the  ministry,  with  certification,  that  if  they 
 did  not  sui)mit  to  tiiis  censure,  they  shoukl  he  ex- 
 communicated. A  number  of  inferior  clergymen 
 were  also  tried  and  censured  for  their  scandalous 
 behaviour,  |)art  of  it  so  gross,  as  to  be  a  reproach 
 to  humanity  itself  Others  were  remitted  to  their 
 Presbyteries,  or  to  committees  ap|)ointed  by  the 
 Assembly,  by  which  they  were  susj)ended  or  de- 
 posed, as  was  reckoned  most  just  and  expedient. 
 In  their  intervals  of  censuring  work,  the  As- 
 sembly carried  forward  their  othei'  business.  The 
 six  Assemblies  of  1606,  i60«,  1610,  1616,  1617, 
 J6I8,  which  King. Tames  had  packed  and  govern- 
 ed by  his  own  will,  were  declared  to  have  been 
 no  courts  of  Christ,  but  null  and  destitute  of  all 
 authority  Upon  this  the  Moderator  observed, 
 that  all  those  that  had  entered  to  the  ministry 
 under  bishops,  were  now  freed  from  their  oath  of 
 conformity  ;  that  Presbyteries  did  well  in  casting 
 ofl'  the  bishops'  authority  as  early  as  possible; 
 and  that  it  was  now  their  duty  to  stand  fast  in 
 the  liberty  wherewith  Christ  hath  made  them 
 free.  After  Mr.  J)ickson  and  Lord  Loudon  had 
 largely  spoken  to  the  same  purpose,  an  act  was 
 made,  declaring  the  oaths  imposed  by  the  bisho|)s 
 upon  entrants  to  have  been  null  and  void  from 
 the  beginning ;  that  the  power  of  Presbyteries 
 had  been  unjustly  suppressed,  and  therefore  it 
 ^vas  must  lawful  tor  them  to  resume  it,  and  to 
 choose  their  Moderators,  and  censure,  and  admit 
 to  the  ministerial  office,  or  a  seat  in  the  Presby- 
 tery,  accordiuM;  to  justice.  That  same  ilay,  large 
 tracts  which  had  been  formed  against  the  llturgif 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  l79 
 
 and  canoiiSf  \A\q  formula  of  clerical  ordinations y  and 
 the  High  Comviission  were  read;  and  all  the  four 
 condemned.  They  condemned  the  liturgy  or  hook 
 of  common  prayer,  because  it  was  devised,  and  in- 
 troduced, and  pressed  by  the  bishops,  without  any 
 direction  or  warrant  from  the  church;  because  it 
 contained  a  Popish  form  of  divine  service,  and 
 many  Popish  errors  and  ceremonies,  the  seeds  of 
 manifold  and  gross  superstition  and  idolatry,  and 
 550  repugnant  to  the  doctrine,  discipline,  and  or- 
 der of  this  church,  and  to  the  confession  of  faith, 
 national  covenant,  and  acts  of  Assembly  and  Par- 
 liament establishing  the  true  religion.  They  con- 
 demned the  book  of  canons f  as  devised  by  the  bi- 
 shops without  any  warrant  and  direction  from 
 the  church,  in  order  to  establish  their  own  tyran- 
 nical power  over  the  worship  of  God,  and  the 
 consciences,  liberties,  and  goods  of  men,  and  to 
 overthrow  the  whole  government  of  the  church 
 by  Assemblies,  Synods,  Presbyteries,  and  Ses- 
 sions established  by  her  confession  and  constitu- 
 tions. They  condemned  the  book  of  consecration 
 and  ordination,  as  introduced  without  any  civil 
 or  ecclesiastical  warrant;  as  establishing  offices  in 
 God*s  house  without  warrant  of  his  word;  as  re- 
 pugnant to  the  discipline  and  constitutions  of  this 
 church;  as  hindering  faithful  men  from  the  mini- 
 stry, or  from  fulfilling  the  duties  of  it.  They  con- 
 demned the  High  Commission,  as  erected  without 
 the  consent  of  either  church  or  state  ;  as  subvert- 
 ing the  ordinary  judicatories  of  the  church;  as 
 arbitrary,  and  not  regulated  by  any  laws;  as 
 mingling  the  civil  and  ecclesiastical  power,  and 
 so  as  unlawful  in  itself,  and  prejudicial  to  the  li- 
 berties of  the  church,  and  the  King's  honour  m 
 maintaining  them. 
 
J  so  A  co.mim:n'diuus  iiistouy  ok  tiik 
 
 The  national  covenant  having"  Ijeen  lately  ta 
 ken  in  three  different  senses,  Ar^yle  and  others 
 introated,  tluit  they  would  speedily  manifest  the 
 original  meaning  of  it.  From  many  old  acts  of 
 Assembly,  in  favours  of  parity  amon^  ministers, 
 and  against  Episcopacy,  it  was  found  evident, 
 that  Prelacy  was  considered  about  1.581  and  K589, 
 as  a  branch  of  the  Romish  hierarchy  abjured  in 
 the  national  covenant;  and  therefore  ou^^ht  to  be 
 removed  out  of  the  church.  'J'hough  ai)()ut  fifty 
 members  did  not  add  the  word  (injured  in  their 
 vote,  yet  only  Mr.  Bailie  i)lainly  manifested  his 
 doubt  of  all  kind  of  Prelacy  being  renounced  in 
 that  oath — The  Assembly  also,  by  comparing 
 them  with  the  word  of  (lod  and  old  acts  ot  As- 
 send)ly,  found  the  artkles  oj' Perth  to  be  abjured 
 by  the  covenant  J.G81,  and  l.'>89;  and  therefore 
 to  be  removed. 
 
 In  their  'J.'^d  and  21th  sessions,  the  .Assembly 
 n  vived  (jld,  or  framed  new  acts  for  promoting  of 
 reformation  among  alJ  ranks.  They  revived  the 
 act  of  l.>iu;,  relative  to  the  corruptions  of  mini- 
 sters, and  remedies  of  them.  They  aj)proved  the 
 erection  of  some  Presbyteries,  and  erected  others 
 in  Argyleshire.  I'heyappointed  that  Presbyieries 
 be  holden  weekly  ;  and  that  an  exercise  and  ad- 
 ditions be  given  in,  and  an  exegesis  exhibited  and 
 sustained  at  each;  that  Presbyteries  visit  all  the 
 c(ingregati(jns  in  their  bounds  once  every  year, 
 and  examine  how  family  worship  is  observed,  and 
 take  care  that  the  youth  be  diligently  instruct- 
 eil ;  that  schools  and  colleges  be  visited,  and  the 
 orthodoxy,  ability,  and  regularity  of  conversation 
 of  the  masters,  tried  ;  that  no  nunister  be  absent 
 froui  hij*  congregation  above  forty  days  in  a  year, 
 witliout  special   liberty  ;   that  schools  be  planted 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  181 
 
 in  landward  places,  and  the  teachers  catechise 
 the  common  people ;   that  Presbyteries  have  the 
 whole  power  of  admitting  ministers,  and  choos- 
 ing their  own  Moderators  ;    that  the  Lord's  sup- 
 per be  more  frequently  administered  ;  that,  in  or- 
 dinary cases,  ministers  be  twenty-five  years  of  age 
 before  they  be  ordained ;   that  burghs  take  pro- 
 per care  to  change  their  markets,  which  are  on 
 Monday  or  Saturday,  to  some  other  day  of  the 
 week;  that  the  Lord's  day  be  carefully  sanctified; 
 that  there  be  afternoon  sermons  in  country  pa- 
 rishes; and  that  Presbyteries  take  care  to  have 
 the  old  acts  against  going  of  mills,  salt  pans,  or 
 fishing  of  salmon,  on  that  day,  duly  executed: — 
 that  obstinate  frequenters  of  the  company  of  ex- 
 communicated persons  be  excommunicated;  that 
 such  as  speak  or  write  against  the  late  covenant 
 of  this  Assembly  or  its  acts,  be  censured  ;  that  all 
 Popish  titles  of  abbots,  priors,  deans,  or  other  ec- 
 clesiastical dignity,   be   abolished  ;   that  none  be 
 admitted  into  any  office  of  pastor,  reader,  or  tea- 
 cher, contrary  to  the  will  of  the  congregation 
 to  which  they  are  appointed ;   that  no  marriages 
 be  celebrated  without  due  proclamation  of  banns; 
 that  funeral  sermons  be  disused,  as  savouring  of 
 superstition  ;  that  the  abilities   and  practice  of 
 candidates  for  the  ministry  be  carefully  examin- 
 ed ;  that  Presbyteries  take  care  to  excommuni- 
 cate such  ministers  as  acquiesce  not  in  lesser  cen- 
 sures inflicted  by  this  Assembly. — They  also  fixed 
 a  plan  of  fourteen  Synods,  and  assigned  six  Pres- 
 byteries to  the  Synod  of  Merse  and  Tiviotdale ; 
 six  to  that  of  Lothian  ;  four  to  that  of  Dumfries  ; 
 three  to  that  of  Galloway  ;  tv^o  to  that  of  Ayr ; 
 five  to  that  of  Glasgow  ;   five  to  that  of  Argyle  ; 
 five  to  that  of  Stirling ;  four  to  that  of  Fife ;  four 
 
182  A  COMfEKDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 to  tliat  of  An^ns;  scveii  to  that  of  Aberdeen;  three 
 to  that  of  Ross ;  three  to  that  of  Caithness ;  two 
 to  that  of  Orkney;  six  to  that  of  Murray  ;  and 
 ap|)uintc(l  their  first  nieetin^^s  on  particular  days 
 of  April  next;  and  that  they  should  all  maintain 
 a  rorres[)ondence  with  their  next  neighbours,  and 
 lor  that  purpose  send  one  or  two  eommissioners 
 to  their  nieitnii^s. —  It  is  scarcely  worth  while 
 to  mention  the  transportations  requested  at  this 
 As^sembly,  as  of  Air  Dickson  to  Glas£^ow  ;  of  Mr. 
 Cant  to  Pitsli<;o;  of  Messrs.  Sharp  and  Hamilton 
 to  Paisley ;  of  Mr.  Douglas  to  Kirkaldy  ;  and  of 
 Blair  and  Rutherford  to  St.  Andrew's.  The  two 
 last  warmly  opposed  their  own  removal  ;  nor 
 would  Rutherford  at  all  accept  of  the  professor- 
 ship of  divinity,  witliout  a  congregation  to  which 
 he  uiight  preach  Christ.  But,  in  prevent  trans- 
 portation for  the  future,  as  much  as  possible, 
 it  was  recommended  to  Presbyteries  to  settle 
 McNsis.  David  Calderwood,  James  Cuthry,  and 
 about  sixty-eight  others,  who,  in  the  Jate  times, 
 had  l)et  n  denied  admission,  and  driven  from  their 
 charges. 
 
 Next  day  the  Assembly  condemned  all  civil 
 potrer  of  ministers.  They  agreed  to  petition  the 
 Parliament  for  a  ratification  of  their  acts.  They 
 asserted  the  divine  right  of  ruling  ciders.  Upon 
 December  'JOth,  in  their  last  session,  they  enact- 
 ed, that  none  should  print  an)  thing  relative  to 
 the  ehuich,  without  a  licence  from  their  clerk ; 
 that  Presbyteries  and  Synods  should  censure  such 
 ministers  as  were  scandalous,  or  would  not  ac- 
 knowledge this  Assembly,  and  submit  to  its  re- 
 (juirtnients.  They  approved  the  late  national 
 covenant,  and  recjuired  all  ministers,  masters 
 of  universities,  colleges,  and  schools,  and  others, 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  1S3 
 
 who  had  not  subscribed  it,  to  take  it  speedily,  as 
 ahjming  P^^elaci/,  the  articles  of  Perth,  and  the  civil 
 places  and  power  of  ministers ;  and  prohil)it  the 
 taking  of  it  in  any  other  sense.  They  asserted 
 the  intrinsic  power  of  the  church,  and  the  divine, 
 ecclesiastical  and  civil  warrant  of  the  General 
 Assembly  to  meet  once  every  year,  or  oftener,  as 
 her  necessities  require.  They  appointed  their 
 next  meeting  at  Edinburgh,  on  the  3d  Wednesday 
 of  July  next ;  but  required  Presbyteries  rather  to 
 keep  the  King's  diet,  if  he  should  appoint  one. 
 They  formed  a  supplication  to  his  IMajesty,  vin- 
 dicating their  conduct,  and  imploring  his  appro- 
 bation and  concurrence.  They  appointed  the 
 marvellous  kindness  of  God  towards  them  to  be 
 thankfully  commemorated  in  their  several  con- 
 gregations and  Presbyteries,  after  their  return 
 home  ;  and  that  they  should  read  the  acts  of  As- 
 sembly to  their  congregations  on  the  firt  Sabbath, 
 and  on  the  next  observe  a  solemn  thanksgiving  to 
 God.  After  an  excellent  speech  by  the  Modera- 
 tor, in  which  he  exhorted  all  present  to  consider, 
 and  be  thankful  for  the  Lord's  goodness  to  them, 
 and  to  manifest  their  gratitude  to  his  Majesty  in 
 earnest  prayer  for  him  and  consciencious  obedi- 
 ence to  him ;  he  was  seconded  by  Messrs  Dick- 
 son and  Ramsay; — and  Argyle,  desired  by  theiMo- 
 derator,  represented  their  deep  obligation  to  a 
 careful  performance  of  their  duty  toward  superi- 
 ors, inferiors  and  equals.  After  concluding  with 
 prayer,  the  Moderator  added,  Now  we  have  cast 
 down  the  walls  of  Jericho,  let  him,  who  rebuilds 
 them,  beware  of  the  curse  of  Hiel  the  Bethelite. 
 On  the  18th of December,a  royal  ruocLAMATioN 
 was  read  over  the  cross  of  Edinburgh,  extolling 
 his  Majesty's  condescension;  vindicating  the  con- 
 
iSi  A   COMPKNDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 (JiK  t  of  tlu'!Nfan|uisori  lamiltonjiis  commissioner, 
 .111(1  rliar^int:  the  covenanters  w  ith  many  disorder- 
 ly and  di.sloyal  practices,  in  ^uardini;  the  castle  ol" 
 Mdiidmr^'h,  stopping  importation  of  warlike  am- 
 munition to  his  xMajcsty's  houses,  carrying;  arms 
 \v  ith  them  to  the  (ilas^ow  Assembly,  contrary  to 
 his  proclamation  ;  and  citing-  his  privy  counsellors 
 to  answer  to  him  and   his    Parliament   lor  their 
 subscription   of  the  late   proclamation   at  (ilas- 
 i^ow,  \c.      In   their   imiotpst,    read  in  answer  to 
 this,  the  covenanters  re])lied,  That  they  had  done 
 nothinp;*  to  the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  but  watched 
 it  in  order  to  prevent  their  own  danger;  that,  by 
 the  laws  of  the  land,  and  maxims  of  all  nations, 
 the  public  safety  is  the  supreme  law,  and  the  end 
 of  all  lawful  power;  that,  by  the  laws  of  the  land, 
 all  forliluations  are  to  be  kept  for  the  welfare  of 
 the  subjects,  as  well  as  for  his  Majesty's  behoof; 
 that  they  had  carried  arms  to  (ilas^njw  to  defend 
 themselves  from  the  outlawed  clan  (Trec^ors,  who 
 just  !)efore  had  ravaged  the  country  about — and 
 had  but   followed  the  example  of  his  Majesty's 
 Commissioner  and  his  attendants  ;  that,  according^ 
 to  law,   counsellors,  who  had  given  bad  counsel, 
 ou^ht  to  be  prosecuted  before  j)roper  judiifes,  civil 
 or  ecclesia>tical.      They  further  sheu  c  il,  that  the 
 firohibition  of  obedience  to  the  acts  of  Assembly, 
 and  assurance   of  protection   in   disobedience  to 
 them,  contained   in   the  pnnhnnation,   were  con- 
 trary to  scripture — the  practice  of  the  primitive 
 church — the  civil  and  canon  law — the  law  of  na- 
 tions— the  acts  of  fovmer  faithful  assemblies — 
 and  to  the  large  confession  of  faith,  and  national 
 covenant. 
 
 After  the  Assembly,  the  court  party  appeared 
 more  and  more  furious.    The  old  college  of  Aber- 
 
 7 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  185 
 
 tleen  threatened  Mr.  Lundy,  their  Commissioner, 
 with  deprivation,   because  he  had  continued  in 
 the  Assembly  after  it  was  dissolved  in  his  Ma- 
 jesty's name.     They  agreed  to  shut  their  gates 
 against  the  Committee,  which  the  Assembly  had 
 appointed  to  visit  their  university,  and  that  no 
 member  should  acknowledge  their  power  under 
 pain  of  deprivation.     The  Marquis  of  Huntley 
 published  the  King's  proclamation  of  December 
 18th,   and   declared  his  resolution   to   keep  the 
 country   for  his   Majesty's  service.      The   town 
 council  put  their  city  into  a  posture  of  defence. 
 Before  Hamilton  set  off  for  London,   in  the  be- 
 ginning of  January   1639,   some  principal  cove- 
 nanters waited  upon  him,    and  besought  him  to 
 intercede  with  his  INIajesty  in  their  favours ;  but 
 he  answered  them  with  threats  of  a  speedy  exe- 
 cution of  royal    vengeance   upon   them.      They 
 nevertheless    transmitted    their    supplication    to 
 Charles  himself,  who  received  it  with  the  utmost 
 contempt,  but  still  disguised  his  warlike  inten- 
 tions, being  not  fully  prepared  to  execute  them. 
 He  meant  to  invade   them  with   60,000  forces 
 from  England  and  Ireland.    But  the  Papists  and 
 high  flying  Episcopalian  clergy  were  almost  the 
 only   willing  contributors   towards    the   charge. 
 Scotchmen  at  court  were  required  to  abjure  the 
 late  covenant  and  Assembly,  and  to  swear,  that 
 they  would  assist  his  Majesty  against  their  coun- 
 try, whenever  he  should   require  them.     Under 
 pretence,   that  the  Scots  were  arming  to  invade 
 and  extirpate   Prelacy  from    England,    Charles, 
 on  January  26th,  issued  forth  a  proclamation,  re- 
 quiring all  the  English  nobility  and  gentry  to  at- 
 tend his  standard  at  York ;  and  appointed  Hunt- 
 ley his  lieutenant  general  for  raising  of  forces  in 
 
 2  li 
 
186  A  COMPFNDIOUS   IIISTOUY  OF  THK 
 
 Scotland.  iNfcain;  liilc,  the  covenanters  proceed- 
 ed in  refniniini^  the  country  froin  wickedness, 
 and  in  censuring  the  scanchdous.  To  vindicate 
 themselves,  they  carefully  dispersed  a  paper 
 thr()U«^h  Mn^^land,  diicctcd  to  all  t^ond  Christians 
 there,  llij^hly  cnra^'^ed  at  the  iUw  credit  wiiich 
 it  obtained,  the  Scotch  bishops  instii^ated  Charles 
 to  emit  a  pioclaniation,  declaring  all  the  cove- 
 nanters traitors  and  tcbfls,  lo  be  read  from  all  the 
 pulpits  in  England.  The  answer  of  the  covenan- 
 XvT^  to  it,  w  Inch  was  also  industriously  dispersed 
 through  MriLiland,  rendered  th(.'ni  more  and  more 
 pitied,  and  their  enemies  proportionally  abhorred. 
 Heini;  at  last  fully  convinced  of  Charles's  inten- 
 tions to  attack  thcni  in  war,  they  studied  to  have 
 the  lawfulness  of  takin^^  up  arms  in  their  own 
 liefcnee  fidly  cleared  to  their  own  consciences,  as 
 well  as  to  the  world.  I\[r.  Hailie  and  the  Karl  of 
 Cassilis,  for  a  time,  much  doubted  if  it  was  law- 
 ful to  resist  their  Sovereiirn,  in  a  forcible  manner. 
 But  y\T.  Henderson,  by  ap])ointnient,  drew  up  a 
 paper  which  solved  their  scruples,  and  vindicated 
 such  conduct.  Some  moved,  that  they  should  sup- 
 j)licate  assistance  from  the  French,  Swedes,  or 
 Dutch  ;  but  others,  doubtin*;  of  the  propriety  of 
 confederacies  with  Lutherans,  and  much  more 
 with  Papists,  they  resolved,  by  the  help  of  (iod, 
 to  stanii  by  themselves.  Only  they  aq-reed  to 
 supplicate  the  French  Kinc^,  the  States  General, 
 the  Prince  of  Orauj^e,  (iueen  of  Sweden,  and 
 Kin«;  of  Dernnark,  to  intercede  with  their  own 
 Sovi'rci^ri,^  tiijit  lie  would  ^-rant  their  rccpiests  a 
 fair  and  unbiassed  hearing;  whii !»,  had  they  done, 
 it  would  have  prevented  much  r(  proach  of  them 
 in  the  nations  around.  IMcanw  Idle,  they  ear- 
 ne:>tly  prepared  for  their  own   warlike  defence. 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  187 
 
 While  General  I.esly  invited  home  the  Scotch 
 officers  from  the  Swedish  army  in  Germany,  and 
 procured  military  stores  from  Holland,  Argyle 
 laboured  to  secure  the  peace  of  the  North,  and  to 
 fix  as  many  as  he  could  in  the  covenanters'  inte- 
 rest. But  Huntley,  his  brother-in-law,  was  too 
 much  in  the  bishops,  if  not  the  Pope's  interest, 
 to  attend  their  meeting  when  desired. 
 
 The  danger  of  the  covenanters  was  exceedingly 
 alarming.  The  Scotch  mariners,  travellers,  and 
 merchants,  in  England  and  Ireland,  were  every 
 where  treated  as  rebels  ;  their  goods  seized,  and 
 their  persons  imprisoned,  unless  they  abjured  the 
 late  national  covenant  and  Glasgow  Assembly. 
 The  King's  army  at  York  increased  fast.  The 
 Marquis  of  Huntley  and  Earls  of  Airly  and 
 Southesk,  and  the  citizens  of  Aberdeen,  began 
 to  take  arms,  and  threaten  the  covenanters  in 
 these  parts  with  immediate  destruction.  In  the 
 South,  the  Marquis  of  Douglas,  Lords  Nithsdale, 
 Herreis,  and  their  followers,  and  those  of  the 
 Mar(  uis  of  Hamilton,  had  or  were  taking  arms 
 for  the  same  purpose.  The  Earls  of  Galloway, 
 Dumfries,  Traquair,  Roxburgh,  Queensberry,  and 
 the  Viscount  of  Dalziel  were  suspected  of  an  in- 
 clination to  join  them  ;  and  that,  by  the  influence 
 of  Hamilton  and  others,  the  citizens  of  Glasgow 
 would  be  made  to  do  the  same.  The  Earl  of  An- 
 trim was  preparing  to  transport  hither  ten  or 
 twelve  thousand  of  his  Irish  countrymen,  pro- 
 bably most  of  them  cruel  and  murderous  Papists. 
 jMany  of  the  Scotch  M'Donalds  had  gone  to  join 
 them,  in  hopes  of  robbing  Argyle  of  Kintyre,  as 
 they  returned.  Hamilton  conducted  his  Majes- 
 ty's navy  for  the  Firth  of  Eorth,  whiie  he  himself 
 brought  northward  the  main  army  l)y  land. 
 
IScS  A  COMrilNDIOUS   IlISTOUY  01"  'iiii: 
 
 Xutwitlistandini,^   all,    the    cuvrnantcrs   levied 
 and  trained  their   troops   in   the   best  way  they 
 could.     God  delivered  into  their  hand  the  strong 
 castles  of   Kdinhiiii^h  and  Oumharton  without  a 
 single  drop  of  hlood.      Nnr  did   those  of   Stratii- 
 avon,  Douglas,     Tantallon,    and    Brodick  cost 
 much  more.      Instigated   hy  Montrose  and  Mar- 
 shal,   ahout  seven  or  eight   thousand,   northward 
 of  the  'J'ay,    took    arms,    with   whom   Montrose 
 oMigcd  the  Ahcrdonians  to  surrender  their  city, 
 and  obliged  Huntley  to  swear  the  covenant,   as 
 directed  hy  the  Assembly,  and  to  send  Commis- 
 sioners to  concur  with  the  other  covenanted  de- 
 puties at  J']diid)urgh,   in  supporting  the  common 
 cause.     I  laving  fortified  Leith,  and  put  the  coun- 
 try into  a   posture   of  defence,   the  covenanters 
 once  and  again,   but  without  success,   attempted 
 to  supplicate    his   IMajesty*s   friendship. — Mean- 
 while, Providence  marvellously  interposed  in  their 
 favours.    Five  or  six  thousand  Walloons  and  Irish, 
 coming  over  against  them,  were  by  the  Dutch  Ad- 
 miral driven  back  to  Dunkirk,    which  then  per- 
 tained to  England.     The   tyranny   of  Strafford, 
 l/ieutenant  of  Ireland,  rendered  it  unsafe  to  send 
 over  any  more  than  about  J  500  ragamuffins,  good 
 for  little  else   but   theft,   robbery,   and    munler. 
 Most   of  the   English  either  declined  serving  in 
 the  invasion,   or  were  very  unhearty  in  it.     The 
 Po|)e  reipiired  his  votaries  to  withhold  their  as- 
 si^tance,  unless  upon  condition  of  a  secured  open 
 liberty   for    their    religion.       Contrary  winds  de- 
 tained Hamilton's  fleet  till  Huntley  and  his  fac- 
 tion were  suppressed,   and   the  covenanters  had 
 got  most  of  their  warlike  stores  imported  from 
 abroad. 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  ISJ) 
 
 Hamilton,  at  last  arriving  in  the  Forth,  trans- 
 mitted to  the  town  council  of  Edinburgh,  the 
 King's  proclamation,  declaring  them  all  traitors^ 
 who  did  not  within  eight  days  submit  to  his  will; 
 and  disponing  their  estates  to  their  superiors  or 
 vassals,  that  should  assist  in  suppressing  them — 
 to  be  published  over  their  cross:  If  ready  obedience 
 was  not  given,  Charles  had  appointed  him  to  pro- 
 secute them  with  fire  and  sword.  The  council 
 begged  to  be  excused  from  publishing  this  procla- 
 mation till  the  Estates  of  Parliament,  which  ^vere 
 to  meet  in  a  few  days,  should  consider  it.  Meet- 
 ing upon  May  9th,  they  found,  that  as  the  pro- 
 clamation was  written  and  printed  without  the 
 kingdom,  and  not  warranted  by  the  privy  coun- 
 cil, and  was  of  so  dangerous  consequence,  it  could 
 not  be  legally  published  ;  that  by  the  laws  of  the 
 land,  no  treason  or  forfeiture  of  life  or  estate, 
 even  of  the  meanest  subject,  far  less  of  Peers, 
 and  the  body  of  the  nation,  could  be  declared, 
 but  in  the  Parliament  or  supreme  court  of  jus- 
 tice, upon  due  citation  and  legal  proof;  and  that 
 as  the  proclamation  required  a  material  renunci- 
 ation of  their  covenant,  they  could  not  obey  it 
 without  bringing  a  curse  upon  the  nation.  They 
 transmitted  their  resolution  to  the  Marquis.  He, 
 next  day,  wrote  to  the  Earl  of  Rothes,  and 
 after  receiving  a  bold  reply,  ret\irned  answer, 
 that  he  intended  to  die  in  his  Majesty's  cause, 
 and  to  the  utmost  of  his  power  prove  an  enemy 
 to  his  obstinate  countrymen.  He  was  neverthe- 
 less more  merciful  than  his  party  wished,  and  la- 
 boured to  persuade  Charles  to  a  treaty  of  peace. 
 
 The  Parliament  meeting  on  May  15th,  they 
 agreed  to  prorogue  it  till  any  day  his  Majesty 
 pleased.     But,  before  they  left  Edinburgh,  thej 
 
li)0  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  01    THE 
 
 appointed  Gonoral  I^csly  tlioir  military  Comman- 
 thr  in  Cliict"  Mcanwliik',  Lord  Ahoyn,  Umitley's 
 son,  and  other  Lords  appointed  hy  Charles,  had 
 raised  a  new  army  in  the  North.  An  invasion 
 from  Irchnul  was  hourly  expected.  The  inacti- 
 vitvof  Charles's  armvon  the  north  border  of  VjUS- 
 Jand,  and  of  his  fleet  in  the  Forth,  was  apprehend- 
 ed to  proceed  from  a  design  to  j^ain  time,  till  the 
 covenanters  should  he  ohliij^cd  to  disperse  them- 
 selves for  want  of  provisions.  After  solemn  fast- 
 in£]^  and  prayer,  INIontrosc,  who  was  offended  that 
 his  late  a(  tivity  in  the  North  was  not  rewarded 
 Avith  the  prfncipal  command,  was  dispatched  to 
 attack  the  royalists  in  the  North.  General  Lesly 
 marched  his  army  toward  the  border  of  Eng- 
 land— while  the  select  committee  fixed  the  pro- 
 per methods  of  modellin*:^  and  supplying  their 
 troops.  The  accounts  o(  their  instructions,  and 
 of  Lesly 's  march,  being  conveyed  to  the  English  ar- 
 my atBirks,al)out  three  milessouth  from  Berwick, 
 threw  many  of  them  into  a  terrible  consternation, 
 ('harle;*  was  obligeil  to  issue  forth  a  proclamaiion, 
 That  he  was  desirous  of  peace,  and  ready  to  grant 
 the  Scots  their  just  recpiests.  But,  fearing  that 
 information  of  the  true  state  of  affairs  would  ren- 
 dermanyof  his  officers  and  forces  altogether  averse 
 to  attack  them,  he  commanded  their  army  not  to 
 come  within  ten  miles  of  his  own  ;  in  wliich,  to 
 manifest  their  desire  of  peace,  and  their  readi- 
 ness to  obey  him  in  every  thing  lawful,  they  sub- 
 mitted. 'J'iie  bishops  persuaded  hiui,  that  fear 
 had  made  them  stop  at  the  appointed  distance — 
 and  to  re  j)ublish  his  proclamation  of  April  25ih, 
 declaring  them  all  rcfh/.s  that  did  not  lay  down 
 their  arms  within  eight  days,  and  setting  a  price 
 on  the  heads  ul   their  chiefs,   and  charging  their 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  191 
 
 vassals  and  tenants  to  pay  them  no  more  rents. 
 This  was  published  at  Dunse.  The  Earl  of  Hol- 
 land, with  4000  men,  was  appointed  to  publish 
 it  at  Kelso  :  but  Colonel  Monro,  and  the  Lords 
 Fleming  and  Erskine,  with  their  forces,  obliged 
 them  to  retire  with  the  utmost  terror  and  preci- 
 pitation. Lesly  advanced  to  Dunse  Law  with  his 
 army.  Contemptible  enough  in  his  crooked  shape, 
 and  of  no  more  than  the  rank  of  a  gentleman,  he 
 behaved  himself  with  such  prudence  and  autho- 
 rity, that  all  the  nobles  readily  obeyed  his  com- 
 mands, which  he  wisely  issued  forth  in  the  form 
 of  advices.  His  raw  troops,  being  daily  exercis- 
 ed, made  great  progress  in  military  skill.  They 
 had  sermons  and  public  prayers,  every  morning 
 and  evening, from  their  beloved  ministers.  Scarce- 
 ly was  there  a  single  tent,  in  the  whole  army,  in 
 which  joint  prayers  and  praises  were  not  twice 
 every  day  offered  to  God. — The  frame  of  their 
 souls  was  no  less  spiritual  and  elevated,  than  if 
 they  had  been  attending  a  noted  communion. 
 Persuasion  of  the  goodness  of  their  cause,  and  of 
 God's  assistance  in  it,  made  them  altogether  bold 
 and  resolute  for  battle,  if  necessary. 
 
 His  army  being  increased  to  20,000,  Lesly  in- 
 clined advancing  nearer  to  the  English  camp, 
 that,  if  possible,  he  might  apprehend  some  of  the 
 principal  incendiaries,  who  had  kindled  the  war. 
 Informed  of  his  intentions,  the  English  laboured 
 in  fortifying  their  camp  ;  and  being  inferior  iu 
 numbers  and  ardour,  were  earnestly  desirous  of 
 peace.  In  order  to  deceive  the  covenanters,  one 
 Lesly,  a  Scotch  domestic  of  Charles,  came  to 
 their  camp  at  Dunse  Law,  and,  with  solemn  pro- 
 fessions of  regard  to  his  country,  falsely  pretend- 
 ed that  the  English  forces  were  multiplying  so 
 1 
 
192  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THK 
 
 fast,  that  tliiy  were  in  tlic  utmost  dan^jcr  of  bc- 
 iiii^  «|»iickly  ^u  allow  I'd  up  hy  them;  and  thciffore 
 bct;L;i.'d  that  ihcy  would  once  more  supplicate  his 
 INIajcsty  for  a  treaty  of  peace,  in  which,  he  said, 
 several  oltlie  Kui^lish  nobility  wouhi  second  them. 
 The  Scots,  nothin;^  terrified  by  his  ti«lin<4s,  but 
 looking  (tn  him  as  sent  by  some  of  the  iMiglish, 
 condescended  to  transmit  another  humble  suppli- 
 cation to  Charles,  alon«;  >\  ith  a  letter  to  the  Lords 
 of  his  Kn^lish  Council.  Puffed  up  with  pride, 
 Charles  insisted,  that  they  should  first  publish 
 his  above-mentioned  declaration  of  April  L^5th, 
 at  the  hea(i  of  their  army.  They  shewed  Sir  Ed* 
 ward  V'ernham  their  reasons  for  refusinc;'  to  do  so; 
 but  to  shew  their  readiness  to  ^o  as  far  as  they 
 could,  they  read  it  with  (^reat  reverence  at  the 
 General's  table.  Vernham  j^ave  such  a  favour- 
 able report  of  their  conduct,  as  made  Charles 
 think  his  order  had  been  as  t;ood  as  obeyed. 
 
 Hereupon  theKarls  of  Arundel,  Essex,  [lolland, 
 Salisbury  and  Berkshire,  and  Secretary  Coke, 
 were  empowered  to  treat  with  the  Earls  of 
 Rothes,  Dunfermline,  and  Loudon,  Sir  William 
 Douglas,  sheriff  of  Teviotdale,  Mr.  Henderson, 
 and  Archibald  .Johnston.  The  Scots  (^)mmis- 
 sioners  had  scarcely  entered  into  Arundel's  tent, 
 when  Charles  himself  came  in,  and  upbraided 
 them  for  accusiuLC  him  of  not  listeniui,^  to  the  re- 
 quests ot  his  loyal  subjects.  After  bei^^i^in^;  his 
 permission  to  speak  freely,  they,  to  his  disho- 
 nour, plainly  represented  their  caust\  and  their 
 just  delences  of  it.  And  in  the  conclusion  of  the 
 conference,  Loudon,  upon  his  knees,  declared, 
 that  they  insisted  for  nothini;  more  than  the  free 
 t  njoyna-nt  nt  their  religion  and  liberties,  accor- 
 dint^  to  the  civil  and   ecclesiastical   laws  of  their 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  19S 
 
 kingdom.  This  Charles  professed  his  readiness 
 to  grant;  but,  instigated  by  the  bishops  of  Ross 
 and  Aberdeen,  kc.  he  talked  more  tartly  on  the 
 Monday  after,  and  interrogated  them,  Whether 
 he  had  the  sole  power  of  indicting  Assemblies  ? 
 Whether  he  had  a  negative  voice  in  them  ?  and. 
 Whether  they  might  sit,  after  he  had  command- 
 ed them  to  dissolve  ?  After  suggesting,  that  the 
 decision  of  such  questions  properly  belong  to  the 
 Assembly  itself,  they,  for  themselves,  allowed 
 Kings  to  have  a  power  of  calling  General  Assem- 
 blies, and  expressed  their  hopes  that  himself  would 
 allow,  that  in  extreme  necessity  the  church  might 
 convene  of  herself,  and  enact  constitutions  for 
 the  preservation  of  religion,  the  plain  reasonable- 
 ness of  which  they  shewed. 
 
 Being  informed,  that  their  army  intended  to 
 take  their  station  nearer  to  his  camp,  he  abandon- 
 ed his  queries,  and  desired  the  Commissioners  to 
 fix  the  particulars  which  they  required  as  terms 
 of  peace.  They  proposed,  that  the  acts  of  the 
 Glasgow  Assembly  should  be  ratified  by  the  Par- 
 liament ;  that  in  all  time  coming  church  affairs 
 should  be  finally  determined  by  the  Assembly,  and 
 civil  affairs  by  the  Parliament;  that  all  his  Ma- 
 jesty's forces,  by  sea  or  land,  should  be  recalled  ; 
 that  all  arrested  persons,  ships,  and  goods,  should 
 be  restored;  that  all  excommunicated  persons 
 who,  for  their  own  private  ends,  had  promoted 
 the  public  commotions,  should  be  remitted  to  Scot- 
 land to  suffer  condign  censure  and  punishment. 
 They  subjoined  their  reasons  to  each  of  these  de- 
 mands. After  some  perplexity,  and  taking  the 
 advice  of  his  council,  Charles  replied.  That 
 though,  for  many  reasons,  he  could  not  approve 
 the  Assembly  of  Glasgow,  yet  he  would  not  only 
 
 2c 
 
194  A    COMt'KNDlOL'S    mSTOHY  OF   TIM-. 
 
 acfree  to  take  away  the  rdurij;ij  and  canons^  and 
 the  Hig;h  Commission,  but  also  dispense  with  the 
 articles  of  Perth,  and  order,  that  no  oath  should 
 be  recjuired  of  entrants  to  the  ministry,  but  what 
 was  appointed  by  act  of  l^arliauient;  and  tliat  bi- 
 shops should  be  censurable  according  to  their  de- 
 merits by  the  (ieneral  Assembly;  and  further 
 agree,  that  all  matters  ecclesiastical  should  be  fi- 
 nally determined  by  the  Assembly,  and  all  civil 
 affairs  hy  civil  courts;  that  General  Assemblies 
 should  be  kept  once  a-year,  or  oftener,  as  neces- 
 sity required  ;  and  that,  for  settling  the  present 
 distractions,  a  free  General  yVssembly  should  '»e 
 indicted  on  the  6th,  and  a  Parliament  on  the 
 20th  of  August  next ;  that,  upon  their  disband- 
 ing their  army,  dissolving  their  Tables  and  con- 
 venticles,  and  restoring  his  castles,  forts,  and  am- 
 munition, and  restoring  to  his  subjects  their  lands 
 and  goods,  which  had  been  seized  since  the  late 
 Assembly,  he  would  withdraw  all  his  forces,  and 
 make  restitution  of  iiwiiry  thing  detained,  on  his 
 part. 
 
 After  some  further  conference,  and  several  r^ri- 
 vate  concessions  by  Charles,  the  Scotch  Commis- 
 sioners were  almost  satisfied,  and  the  articles  of 
 pacification  were  drawn  up,  bearing,  That  the  co- 
 venanters' forces  should  l)e  disbanded  within  forty- 
 eight  hours  after  the  publication  of  his  above  de- 
 claration is  agreed  upon;  that  all  his  castles,  forts, 
 and  ammunition  shall  be  delivered,  as  soon  after 
 the  said  publication  as  he  shall  send  his  servants 
 to  receive  them  ;  that  thereon  all  his  ships  shall 
 depart  with  the  first  fair  wind,  and  till  then  shall 
 in  no  wise  interrupt  the  trade  or  fishing;  that  he 
 flhall  restore  all  j)ersons,  goods,  and  ships,  wiiich 
 linve  been  detained  since  November  last  ;   that 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  195 
 
 there  shall  be  no  meetings  of  the  subjects  in  Scot- 
 land, but  such  as  are  warranted  by  act  of  Parlia- 
 ment ;  that  there  be  no  further  fortifications 
 made,  and  these,  that  are,  remitted  to  his  Ma- 
 jesty's pleasure ;  that  all  his  good  subjects  have 
 their  lands,  houses,  and  goods  restored  to  them, 
 which  have  been  seized  since  November  last.  As 
 the  articles  to  which  his  Majesty  had  agreed,  at 
 the  private  conference,  were  not  subscribed,  nor 
 made  public,  the  Earl  of  Cassilis,  after  the  reading 
 of  the  public  articles  in  the  camp,  read  and  pro- 
 tested, upon  a  short  information  agreed  to  by  the 
 managers — That  though  his  Majesty  did  not  ap- 
 prove the  Glasgow  Assembly,  he  did  not  intend 
 that  the  acceptance  of  his  declaration  should  in- 
 fer any  disapprobation  of  it ;  and  that  their  ac- 
 ceptance of  it  imported  no  such  thing.  This  in- 
 formation was  again  read  along  with  his  Majes- 
 ty's declaration  at  the  cross  of  Edinburgh.  AVhile 
 these  things  were  transacting  at  Birks,  Montrose 
 had,  with  no  small  difficulty,  levied  an  army  in 
 the  North,  and  he  and  Colonel  Middleton  had 
 routed  Aboyne's  forces,  and  were  just  going  to 
 plunder  the  city  of  Aberdeen,  when  an  express 
 concerning  the  pacification  prevented  it. 
 
 Neither  party  were  pleased  with  the  above 
 treaty.  The  furious  royalists  pretended.  That 
 Charles  had  lost  a  glorious  opportunity  of  com- 
 pletely crushing  the  covenanters,  and  had  disho- 
 noured himself,  by  allowing  them  such  equal 
 terms;  and  they  loudly  reproached  Flamilton 
 and  others,  as  advisers  to  it.  Many  of  the  cove- 
 nanters were  displeased  with  the  obscurity  of 
 the  articles,  and  especially  with  the  surrender  of 
 the  castle  of  Edinburgh,  and  the  fortifications  of 
 Ixith,  without  proper  terms.  Nevertheless,  they 
 burnt  their  camp,  disbanded  their  army,  and  gave 
 
196  A    tOMPKNDlOL'S   III.STURY   OF   TIIK 
 
 up  the  castle  of  Kdinburgli  to  Hamilton,  who 
 committed  it  toRuthvcn,  who  had  ac(juired  much 
 iiiilitaiy  honour  in  the  Swedish  army.  But  Charles 
 paid  no  such  regard  to  his  solemn  agreement, 
 but  left  strong"  <;arrisons  in  Berwick  and  Carlisle, 
 and  disbanded  his  other  forces  very  slowly.  And 
 he  and  his  friends  ripened  matters  for  a  new  rup- 
 ture. In  Edinburgh,  Huntley  and  Aboyne,  his 
 son,  were  scarcely  liberated  from  prison,  when 
 Aboyne  and  Iluthven,  in  their  drunken  revels, 
 provoked  some  common  people  to  chastise  their 
 insolence  ;  this  was  loudly  complained  of.  Grant 
 and  Dugair,  two  tools  of  Huntley,  ravaged  the 
 territories  of  the  Earl  of  Marshal  and  other  co- 
 venanters in  the  North.  The  covenanters  pro- 
 test against  his  calling  of  the  bishops  to  the 
 next  General  Assembly  as  members  ;  their  allow- 
 ance of  subsistance  money  to  Lesly  and  some 
 other  officers,  till  they  could  be  otherwise  provid- 
 ed; their  meeting  together,  in  order  to  pay  off  the 
 debt  which  tiiey  had  contracted  in  the  war;  their 
 enemies  falsely  charging  them  with  forcing  the 
 subs(  ription  of*  their  covenant,  and  some  parts  of 
 it  misunderstood ;  and  their  Commissioners  di- 
 vulging some  of  his  private  concessions,  j)rovoked 
 ("harks  against  them.  Under  pretence  of  de- 
 sired consultation  with  them,  but  really  intend- 
 ing to  apprehend,  if  not  assassinate  them,  he  call- 
 ed up  fourteen  ot  their  principal  leaders  to  Lon- 
 don. But  the  mob,  having  got  some  notice  of 
 his  intentions,  prevented  their  ojjeying  him.  This 
 di:^appiiintment  so  enraged  him,  that  he  had  re- 
 called both  Assembly  and  Parliament,  if  Hamil- 
 ton had  not  persuaded  him  otherwise,  ami  Tra- 
 <juair  a.^surtd  him,  that  no  act  of  Parliamiiit, 
 wl)ich*passed  without  the  bishops,  >\  ho  were  the 
 third  Estate,  could  have  force  in  law. 
 
CHURCH  OF^SCOTLAND.  197 
 
 Hamilton  having  refused  to  be  Commissioner 
 to  tlie  next  Assembly,  Traquair  was  appointed, 
 and  was  instructed  to  declare  against  lay  elders 
 having  any  vote  in  the  election  of  Commissioners 
 from  Presbyteries,  or  in  any  fundamental  point 
 of  religion  ;  to  shift  all  questions  relative  to  the 
 last  Assembly,  or  to  the  King's  power  in  calling 
 or  dissolving  Assemblies  ;  to  permit  the  abolish- 
 ment of  Prelacy,  not  as  sinful  in  itself,  but  as  ne- 
 cessary to  the   peace  of  the  kingdom  ;   to  allow 
 the  swearing  of  the  covenant,  providing  that  Pre- 
 lacy be  not  abjured  in  it,  as  contrary  to  the  word 
 of  God  and  Protestant  religion  ;  to  endeavour  to 
 have   those  ministers  who   have  been   deposed, 
 speedily  reponed,  upon  their  profession  of  repen- 
 tance— and  that  the  King  may  have  a  power  of 
 choosing  fourteen  ministers  to  vote  in  Parliament 
 instead  of  the  bishops;  to  indict  another  Assem- 
 bly as  far  back  in  the  following  year  as  possi- 
 ble ;  to  take  heed  that  nothing  civil  be  treated 
 in  the  Assembly,   and  no  Commissioner  be  sent 
 from  it  to  the  King ;  nor  any  act  made  for  the 
 continuance  of  the  tables  or  any  like  meetings. 
 And,  at  the  end,    to  protest,  That  if  any  thing 
 prejudicial  to  the  King's    interest    should  have 
 been  granted,  he  should  be  heard  for  redress  in 
 his  own  time  and  place.    From  these  instructions 
 it  appears,  that  Charles  merely  inclined  to  de- 
 ceive the  covenanters,  whom  he  could  not  subdue; 
 and  that  he  really  inclined  to  yield  nothing  at  all 
 important,  and  left  himself  an  open  door  to  revoke 
 every  concession  made  in  his  name.  Accordingly, 
 in  a  few  days  after,  he  wrote  to  Traquair,  that  he 
 would  not  yield  to  a  ratification  of  the  Glasgow 
 Assembly,  nor  to  the  abolishment  of  Prelacy,  as 
 contrary  to  the  covenant  of  \5S\i  and  the  consti- 
 
198  A    COMriiNDIOLS    HISTORY  OK  THIi 
 
 tiitions  of  tills  church;  nor  to  have  the  service  hook 
 and  canons  corulcinncci  as  containin;^  divers  seeds 
 ofPoperyand  superstition,  or  the  Hi  rrh  Commhssion 
 conticiniuHl,  as  without  law,  or  ch*structive  to  ci- 
 vil and  ecclesiastical  judicatories — nor  the  r7;7/c/^^ 
 of  Perth  as  contrary  to  the  national  covenant — or 
 that  the  Assenihlit's  Piorj — Hjl8,  should  be  de- 
 clared di'stitnte  of  authority  ;  and  that  if  any  such 
 thini^  sliould  be  done  he  should  protest  against  it. 
 lie  further  instructed  him,  that  he  would  not  be 
 bouful  to  allow  General  Assemblies  every  year; 
 and  that  the  covenant  behoved  to  be  sworn  as  it 
 htuod  in  1581,  without  any  interpretation  sub- 
 joined to  it,  unless  the  Rin^  approved  it.  IMean- 
 v/hile,  he  admonished  the  bishops  not  to  ^o  to  the 
 Assembly,  as  nothing  but  partiality  could  be  ex- 
 pected at  it;  and  assured  them,  that  notwith- 
 standing his  present  concessions,  he  was  firmly 
 determined  to  have  their  grievances  redressed. 
 
 The  General  Assembly  having  met,  August 
 12th,  Mr.  Henderson  opened  it  with  a  sermon 
 from  Acts  v.  33.  and  exhorted  the  Commissioner 
 and  members  to  vie  with  each  other  in  thankful- 
 ness, zeal,  moderation,  and  prudence.  No  sooner 
 had  Mr.  Dickson,  the  new  moderator,  finished  a 
 like  speech,  than  Tracjuair  excepted  against  all 
 the  ( ommissions  of  such  as  had  been  elected  by 
 more  ruling  elders  than  ministers,  or  for  places 
 in  which  they  had  not  their  residence — or  of  el- 
 dns  elected  for  places  in  which  they  resided,  but 
 had  not  been  originally  chosen  to  their  office;  or 
 of  such  as  were  under  horning  and  outlawry — 
 but  named  no  body.  The  Assembly  therefore 
 procci'dcd  to  their  business,  and  with  pleasure 
 received  (;raham  of  Orkney,  and  Lindsay  of 
 Ounkcld's  renunciation  of  Prelacy.     To  please 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  199 
 
 his  Majesty,  and  retain  what  they  had  j^ot,  they 
 formed  the  substance  of  the  service  hook  and  ca- 
 nons, the  High  Commission  and  articles  of  Perth , 
 prelatical  offices,  civil  poiver  of  ministers,  and  cor- 
 rupt Assemblies,  into  one  act,  and  as  it  were  re- 
 enacted  them,  in  terms  a  little  softened,  declar- 
 ing, that  the  liturgy,  canons,  and  High  Commis- 
 sion should  be  still  rejected,  the  articles  of  Perth 
 no  more  practised.  Episcopal  jurisdiction  and  ci- 
 vil power  of  clergymen  still  held  unlawful  in  this 
 church  ;  that  the  six  Assemblies  of  Linlithgow 
 1606,  and  1608,  of  Glasgow  1610,  of  Aberdeen 
 1616,  of  St.  Andrew's  1617,  and  of  Perth  1618, 
 should  hereafter  be  accounted  destitute  of  all  au- 
 thority ; — and  that,  in  order  to  prevent  the  like 
 evils  in  time  coming,  General  Assemblies  shall 
 be  held  once  every  year  or  oftener,  if  need  be,  in 
 consequence  of  remonstrance  to  his  I\lajesty  of 
 the  necessity  thereof ;  and  that  Sessions,  Presby- 
 teries and  Synods,  should  be  constituted  accor- 
 ding to  the  order  of  this  church.  This  act  was 
 voted  with  great  harmony  ;  and  Traquair  declar- 
 ed his  approbation  of  it,  and  promised  that  it 
 should  be  ratified  in  the  ensuing  Parliament.  To 
 prevent  the  precipitant  entry  of  novations  for  the 
 future,  the  Assembly  enacted,  that  no  novation 
 tending  to  disturb  the  peace  of  the  church  should 
 be  proponed,  till  the  matter  had  been  first  com- 
 municated to  the  several  Sessions,  Presbyteries, 
 and  Synods — that  commissioners  may  come  up 
 prepared  to  give  a  solid  determination. 
 
 Contrary  to  Traquair's  inclination,  the  reports 
 of  the  commission  of  the  last  Assembly  relative 
 to  their  censuring  of  scandalous  clergymen  were 
 produced  and  approved.  Their  number  amount- 
 ed to  eighteen  ;  Init  the  Assembly  recommended 
 
200        A  (:r)MPKNnrous  history  of  tiif 
 
 to  inferiorjudicatories  to  reponc  them  and  others, 
 who  had  been  deposed  for  declininfj  of  the  last 
 Assembly,  or  for  readini;  of  the  service  book,  upon 
 any  tolerable  manifestation  of  their  repentance. 
 They  next  considered  the  large  decldi'ation  pub- 
 lished in  his  Majesty's  name,  but  really  composed 
 by  Dr.  Balcanquel,  without  Charles  havini^  any 
 knowledge  of  many  of  the  facts,  but  by  Jiis  mis- 
 representation. Nine  ministers,  the  Earls  of 
 Rothes,  Cassilis,  and  Loudon,  the  Lords  Kirk- 
 cudbrii^ht  and  Burleif^h,  and  two  ij^entlemen,  were 
 appointed  as  a  committee  to  examine  it.  They 
 pointed  out  eight  articles  dishonourable  to  his  Ma- 
 jesty,/A /Wcezi  dishonourable  to  this  church,  thirteen 
 dishonourable  to  the  nation,  t went i/- six  gross  fals- 
 lioods,  and  four  most  WTCtched  misrepresentations 
 of  their  conduct.  The  Assembly  therefore  sup- 
 plicated Charles  to  call  in  the  copies  of  it,  and 
 appoint  the  writers  of  it  to  be  prosecuted  for  their 
 calumnies.  But  either  Traquair  neglected  to  pre- 
 sent their  petition,  or  Charles  disrei^arded  it. — 
 They  also  authorised  the  subscription  of  the  na- 
 tional covenant,  as  explained  by  the  Glasf^ow  As- 
 sembly, and  besought  the  privy  council  to  rerjuire 
 it  of  all  the  subjects  with  due  ex[iedition.  Tra- 
 quair subscribed  it,  with  a  declaration,  which  he 
 said  merely  respected  him  as  King's  Commis- 
 sioner ;  and  he  promised  to  have  their  act  rati- 
 fied by  the  Parliament.  They  recommended  to 
 the  Parliament  a  supplication  in  favours  of  some 
 ministers,  who  had  been  oj)pressed  by  Huntley 
 and  otluT  loyalists,  in  the  Highlands  and  Islands. 
 They  approved  several  overtures,  bearing,  That 
 n  commiltre  should  be  appointed  to  revise  all  the 
 acts  of  fornu-r  Assemblies,  that  might  be  of  ge- 
 neral u>c  i  that  the  Parliament  should  be  intreat- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  201 
 
 ed  to  restrain  people  from  going  to  England 
 for  irregular  marriages  ;  that  Commissioners  to 
 the  Assembly,  from  remote  places,  should  have 
 their  expenses  furnished  by  the  Sessions  in  these 
 Presbyteries  that  send  them;  that  deposed  mini- 
 sters demit  their  charges  under  pain  of  excom- 
 munication ;  that  the  acts  againsts  Papist  and 
 excommunicated  persons,  and  such  as  frequent 
 their  company,  or  encourage  them,  be  duly  exe- 
 cuted ;  that  a  public  catechism  and  order  of  fa- 
 mily worship  be  drawn  up  ;  and  that  candidates 
 presented  to  kirks  be  carefully  tried  with  respect 
 to  their  fitness  for  their  charge. 
 
 As,  by  the  instigation  of  Strafford,  an  oath  ac- 
 knowledging  the  King's  supremacy  in  all  eccle- 
 siastical  and  civil  cases,  and  an  abjuration  of  the 
 Scotch  covenant,  and  all  like  bonds,  had  been  im- 
 posed upon  such  Scotsmen  as  were  found  inEng. 
 land,  and  especially  in  Ireland,  where  Strafford  do- 
 mineered, many  who  had  been  thereby  oppressed, 
 besought  the  Assembly  to  intercede  in  their  fa- 
 vours, and  declared  themselves  ready  to  swear 
 the  oath  of  allegiance,  or  any  other  declaration  of 
 loyalty  consistent  with  their  covenant.    The  As- 
 sembly recommended  this  affair  to  the  ensuing 
 Parliament.     It  is  observable,  that  many  tender 
 Christians,  who  fled  from  Ireland,  to  avoid  the 
 above  oath,  escaped  the  massacre,  while  those, 
 who  complied  with  it  from  carnal  considerations, 
 were  quickly  stript  of  their  lives  and  property  by 
 the  Papists. — After  appointing  their  next  meeting, 
 INIr.  Dickson,  in  a  solemn  speech,  represented  the 
 mixture  of  God's  mercy  and  justice  towards  them 
 for  some  time  past ;  and  that,  on  account  of  his 
 Majesty's  education    and    misinformation,   they 
 ought  always  to  view  his  conduct  in  the  most  fa- 
 
 2  D 
 
202  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 vourablc  lig'lit ; — and  commended  Hamilton  and 
 'IVaiinair  iur  the  services  which  they  had  done 
 this  church;  and  recommended  to  ministers  and 
 elders  their  respective  duties  in  the  present  cir- 
 cumstances. Soon  after  the  risini,^  of  this  Assem- 
 bly, a  solemn  thanksgiving^  was  observed  through 
 the  kingdom,  the  causes  of  which  were  drawn  up 
 by  the  Presbytery  of  Kdin!)urgh. 
 
 A\  hen  the  rarliament  met,  August  .'31st,  it  was 
 proposed  to  have  the  following  articles  enacted 
 into  standing  laws.  That  the  Parliament  con- 
 sist only  of  Lords,  Barons,  and  Burgesses  ;  and 
 that  all  acts  empowering  Commissioners  from  the 
 kirk  be  rescinded ;  that  the  acts  of  the  late  As- 
 sembly relative  to  bygone  evils  and  the  remedies 
 thereof  be  ratified;  that  the  whole  power  of  nam- 
 ing the  Lords  for  forming  the  articles  to  be  con- 
 sidered in  Parliament,  be  in  the  three  estates 
 themselves;  that  the  castles  of  Edinburgh,  Dum- 
 barton, and  Stirling,  be  entrusted  to  none,  but  by 
 the  advice  of  Parliament;  that  the  large  declara- 
 Hon  which,  in  his  Majesty's  name,  had  so  exceed- 
 ingly calumniated  the  covenanters,  be  condemn- 
 ed ;  and  that  the  privy  council  be  subordinated  to, 
 and  censurable  by  the  Parliament.  But  Traquair, 
 the  Commissioner,  directed  by  Charles,  or  afraid 
 that  such  deeds  would  enrage  him,  jirevented 
 their  establishment,  by  proroguing  the  Parlia- 
 ment nine  tiiues  in  the  months  of  September  and 
 October. — Finding  themselves  thus  restrained, 
 tlicy  deputed  the  b'arlsof  I  .oudon  and  Dunfermline 
 to  implore  Charles's  allowance  to  proceed  in  their 
 work  :  and,  meanwhile,  a  solemn  fast  was  ohserv- 
 <'d  for  bewailing  that  their  enemies  were  like  to 
 frustiat(  tlu'ir  great  expectations;  and  that  op- 
 pression and  violence  much  prevailed  in  the  nor- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  203 
 
 thern  parts  of  the  kingdom  ;  that  there  were  few 
 faithful  labourers  in  the  church,  and  no  due  care 
 taken  of  the  seminaries  of  learning;  that  the  case 
 of  the  truly  poor  was  much  overlooked,  while 
 sturdy  beggars  ranged  about  without  controul ; 
 and  that  unthankfulness,  carnal  security,  indo- 
 lence in  promoting  of  the  reformation,  which  they 
 had  solemnly  engaged,  and  neglect  of  God's  wor- 
 ship in  public,  private  or  secret,  much  abounded. 
 Informed  of  the  approach  of  Dunfermline  and 
 Loudon,  and,  supposing  that  they  had  no  com- 
 mission from  Traquair,  Charles  prohibited  them 
 to  come  within  a  mile  of  his  presence.  By  the 
 Queen,  Strafford,  and  Laud's  influence,  his 
 private  concessions  to  the  covenanters  at  the 
 treaty  of  Birks,  were  openly  impugned,  and  pub- 
 licly burnt  by  the  hangman.  Traquair  was  charg- 
 ed  to  prorogue  the  Parliament  till  the  2d  of  June, 
 1640;  and  to  declare  such  as  should  refuse  to  rise, 
 guilty  of  high  treason.  When  he  executed  his 
 orders,  November  14th,  the  Estates  read  a  solemn 
 declaration  against  his  deed,  narrating  what  had 
 been  done,  and  declaring  the  prorogation  null 
 and  void:  but  that,  to  carry  their  obedience  to  the 
 utmost  length  that  could  consist  with  a  good 
 conscience,  they  would  discontinue  their  meet- 
 ing till,  by  their  committee,  they  had  presented 
 their  remonstrances  to  his  Majesty.  Commission- 
 ers from  this  committee  were  allowed  to  repair 
 to  Charles.  But  Traquair,  to  atone  for  the  of- 
 fence which  he  had  given  by  his  concessions  in 
 the  Assembly,  after  several  attempts  to  divide 
 the  covenanters,  or  to  exasperate  them  by  his  ar- 
 bitrary procedure,  repaired  to  court,  and  there 
 represented  their  conduct  in  tlie  most  odious 
 light,  and  suggested,  that  they  could  only  be  sub- 
 
204  A   COMPENDI()r>    m^luUi    Ul    'IUE 
 
 ilucd  hy  force,  some  methods  oC  which  he  point- 
 ed out — and  tliiis  inlhimed  the  Kn^^lish  courtiers. 
 l)un((.*indiiic  and  Loudon,  and  two  gentlemen, 
 were  nevertheless  sent  up  to  his  Majesty,  hut  di- 
 rected to  he  ware  of  acknowledj^in^^  the  Eni^lish 
 council  as  their  juci^^ts; — t(j  refute  the  misrepre- 
 sentations of  Tracpiair ;  to  support  the  articles 
 which  had  heen  proposed  to  the  Parliament;  to 
 insist  for  a  speedy  recal  of  that  court;  to  remon- 
 strate against  fdling  the  castles  of  Edinhurgh  and 
 Oumharton  \\ith  foreigners,  or  exacting  from 
 Scotchmen  in  l^ngland  and  Ireland  any  oath  in- 
 consistent with  their  covenant. — They  managed 
 their  cause  with  great  spirit — illustrated  the  ar- 
 ticles mentioned,  and  answered  a  multitude  of  ob- 
 jections made  hy  Laud  and  Tracpiair. 
 
 After  Charles  and  his  council  had,  for  a  time, 
 pretended  a  desire  of  agreement,  that  they  might 
 carry  on  their  warlike  preparations  the  more  un- 
 ohservahly,  the  Scotch  Commissioners  were  ta- 
 ken into  custody,  and  Loudon  committed  to  the 
 Tower  for  a  letter,  w  hich,  they  pretended,  he  had 
 sent  to  the  French  King.  The  letter  referred  to 
 Jiad  lje(Mi  drawn  up  a  year  before  by  Montrose, 
 when  Charles  was  marching  to  invade  Scotland, 
 and  had  been  transcribed  by  Loudon,  and  sub- 
 scribed by  them  two,  and  the  Lords  Mar,  IMont- 
 g(jmery,  Forrester,  and  General  Lesly  ;  but  never 
 made  use  of;  nor  had  either  date  or  direction. 
 One  Goram  getting  hold  of  it,  delivered  it  to 
 Tra(piair,  and  he  to  Charles,  who  h.)j)ed  to  turn 
 it  to  Ills  own  atlvantage,  particularly  in  making 
 a  sacrifice  of  l^oudon,  who  had  been  a  principal 
 leader  of  the  covenanters.  Upon  examination, 
 Loudon  readily  acknowledged  his  own  hand  writ- 
 ing and  subscription;  but  pled,  that  the  letter  was 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  205 
 
 written  before  the  late  pacification,  when  his  Ma- 
 jesty was  marching  to  invade  his  native  kingdom; 
 and  that,  in  these  circumstances,   they  thought 
 none  so  fit  to  intercede  with  him  as  his  brother-in- 
 law,   than  which   their  letter  desired  no  more. 
 Notwithstanding,  Charles  was  determined  to  have 
 him  assassinated,  and  ordered  Balfour,  lieutenant 
 of  the  Tower,  to  have  his  head  struck  off,  before 
 nine  o'clock  next  morning.    After  informing  Lou- 
 don, Balfour  acquainted  Hamilton  with  this  man- 
 date. He  and  Balfour  having  got  access  to  Charles, 
 so  represented  to   him   the  infamous   nature  of 
 murdering  a  nobleman,  to  whom  he  had  given  a 
 safe  conduct,  and  the  terrible  consequences  that 
 might  follow,    that   they  got  him,    with  reluc- 
 tance, to  tear  his  warrant.    Some  time  after,  up- 
 on promise  of  concealing  his  treatment,  and  en- 
 gaging to  use  his  utmost  endeavours  to  dispose 
 his  countrymen  to  subjection,  Loudon  was  per- 
 mitted to  return  home. 
 
 In  November  1639,  Charles  and  his  council 
 had  resolved  upon  a  new  war  with  the  Scots. 
 But  it  was  difficult  to  find  money  to  bear  the  ex- 
 penses of  it.     Strafford  subscribed  for  L.  20,000 
 Sterling,  the  Dukes  of  Lennox  and  Richmond 
 for  as  much,  if  not  double.      Many  of  the  Eng- 
 lish nobility  and  gentry  subscribed  largely  enough, 
 chiefly  the  Papists,  instigated  by  their  Queen. 
 By  Strafford's  influence,    the    Irish   Parliament 
 voted  about  L.  24^,000     The  English  clergy  vot- 
 ed an  annual  compliment  of  L.  20,000.    All  these 
 being  insufficient,  Charles  was  obliged  to  call  an 
 English  Parliament  to  provide  more ;  but  whose 
 stubborn    commons    would    allow    him    no    mo- 
 ney, unless  in  the  way  of  securing  their  own  re- 
 ligion and  liberties,  which  he  and  his  agents  had 
 1 
 
20G  A  COMPENDIOUS    HISTORY  OP  THK 
 
 foarrully  inrriiii^eil.  lie  therefore  had  recourse 
 to  methods  dishonest  and  iiifainous — which  <;ave 
 the  covenanters  time  to  prepare  for  their  own  de- 
 fence. INIeanw  hihs  Charles  did  them  all  the  mis- 
 rhief  that  he  could.  Their  ships  were  arrested 
 in  Eni;land  and  Ireland;  and  these  that  were  traf- 
 fickini;  to  other  places  were  seized,  and  these  in 
 them  harharously  imi)risoned.  The  castle  of  Edin- 
 l)ur^Hi  was  repaired  and  reinforced,  and  the  i^ar- 
 rison  daily  killini;  some  of  the  inhabitants,  or 
 spoiliui,^  their  iiouses.  The  English  General  had 
 a  commission  to  destroy  the  whole  Scotch  nation. 
 Charles  published  a  declaration,  requiring  all  his 
 subjects  in  England  and  Ireland,  to  take  arms 
 against  them,  and  treat  them  as  rebels.  The 
 Irish  Parliament  declared  them  such.  Alarmed 
 by  these  things,  the  covenanters  sent  Rothes  and 
 Lindsay  to  solicit  the  Marquis  of  Hamilton  to  in- 
 tercede for  them  with  their  King.  But  finding 
 no  help  in  man,  they  betook  themselves  to  God 
 by  fasting  and  prayer.  The  Presbytery  of  Edin- 
 burgli.  which  had  been  desired,  by  the  Commit- 
 tee of  Estates,  to  warn  the  church  of  her  ap- 
 proaching danger,  proposed  a  solemn  fast  on  ac- 
 count of  the  gross  ignorance,  superstition,  sorce- 
 ry, profanation  of  the  Lord's  name  and  Sabbath, 
 neglect  of  his  worshi]),  uncleanness,  intemperance, 
 fraud  and  violence,  contrary  to  their  covenants — 
 and  on  account  of  their  perplexing  outward  cir- 
 (  nmstances,  thereby  procured:  They  also  spread 
 inlormatory  renujnstrances  among  their  friends 
 in  England,  part  oi  which  were  burnt  by'the  hang- 
 nuii.  Ni'vertheless  they  did  not  begin  their  war- 
 like piiparations  till  June  next  year:  Nor  did 
 they  ^tir,  till  the  Parliament  had  concluded  on 
 I  he  war,  ami  aj)|)ointed  the  general  officers.  'J'hcse 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  207 
 
 in  the  west  did  not  begin  their  march  till  Au 
 gust. 
 
 When  the  Parliament  met  at  Edinburgh,  June  2, 
 1640,  Traquair  durst  not  attend  it,  as  Charks's 
 Commissioner.  But  the  Lords  Elphingston  and 
 Napier,  Orbiston,  justice  clerk,  and  Lewis  Stew- 
 art, as  King's  advocate,  were  empowered  in  his 
 absence  to  prorogue  their  meeting.  But,  upon 
 reading  their  commission,  Elphingston  and  Na- 
 pier doubted  of  the  legality  of  their  acting  with- 
 out Traquair's  order,  and  the  other  two  could  do 
 nothing  but  protest.  The  Estates  therefore  vot- 
 ed themselves  a  legal  Parliament,  and  chose  Lord 
 Burleigh  for  their  President;  and  enacted  all  the 
 articles  proposed  at  their  former  meeting,  with 
 some  variations.  They  ordained  that  this  and 
 all  future  meetings  of  Parliament  should  consist 
 only  of  Noblemen,  Barons,  and  Burgesses,  re- 
 scinding all  former  laws  in  favours  of  the  voting 
 of  bishops  or  other  clergymen ; — that  all  future 
 Parliaments  shall  have  the  power  of  appointing 
 a  committee  for  drawing  up  articles  to  be  laid 
 before  them — the  members  of  which  each  Estate 
 shall  choose  from  among  themselves.  They  ra- 
 tified the  act  of  the  last  General  Assembly  con- 
 demning bygone  corruptions,  and  appointed  the 
 late  covenant  to  be  subscribed  by  all  ranks  under 
 all  civil  pains ;  and  particularly  by  members  of 
 Parliament  before  admission  to  a  seat,  and  by  all 
 magistrates,  ministers,  and  state  officers,  before 
 their  admission.  They  declared,  that  the  power 
 of  jurisdiction  in  the  church  stands  only  in  As- 
 semblies, Synods,  Presbyteries,  and  Sessions;  and 
 revived  the  act  of  1.G92,  establishing  Freshi/terian 
 government  in  all  the  heads  of  it ;  and  rescinded 
 all  laws  in  fcxvours  of  Prelacy ;  but,  for  fear  of 
 
'J08  A  COMPKNDIOUS  HISTOllV  OF  THE 
 
 givins^  a  handle  to  their  exasperated  Kin^,  left 
 unnoticed  s'une  former  acts  of  Parliament  estah- 
 lishini;  his  eoelesiastical  supremacy.  'J'hey  de- 
 clared null  and  raid  all  the  censures  inflicted  hy 
 the  late  hishops  or  Iheir  aijcnts;  and  that  Presby- 
 teries had  the  power  of  presentini^  ministers  in 
 these  parishes  in  which  the  bishops  had  claimed 
 it;  and  ordained,  that  Presbyteries,  with  consent 
 of  the  eoni;re«;ation,  should  plant  these  parishes 
 which  had  lain  six  months  vacant.  They  prohi- 
 bited the  ^"oiiii;  of  mills  antl  salt  pans,  and  the 
 fishing  of  salmon  on  the  Lord's  days,  or  the  holding 
 of  fairs  upon  ^Mondays  ;  and  appointed  justices 
 of  peace  and  kirk  sessions  to  j)revent  the  profa- 
 nation of  the  Sabbath  by  the  confluence  of  reap- 
 ers, or  of  peoj)le  to  hire  them  in  harvest.  They 
 ratified  all  the  former  laws  against  Papists,  ex- 
 communicated persons,  and  such  as  reset  them  ; 
 and  appointed  letters  ol'  horning  to  be  issued  forth 
 against  the  bishops  and  other  excommunicated 
 persons.  They  approved  the  Assembly's  suppli- 
 cation against  the  large  dcclaraiiony  and  ordered 
 the  authors  and  spreaders  of  it  to  be  punished  as 
 \:^\\\iy oUeaseviaking  unA  sowing  division  between 
 his  Majesty  and  his  loyal  subjects.  They  enact- 
 ed, that  a  free  Parliament  should  be  held  once, 
 or  oftener,  in  every  three  years  ;  that  the  castles 
 of  Edinburgh,  Dumbarton,  and  Stirling,  should 
 be  entrusted  only  to  natives,  well  afl'ected  to  King 
 and  country  ;  that  none  should  vote  in  Parlia- 
 ment by  proxy;  that  none  should  be  nobilitat- 
 ed,  who  had  not  ten  thousand  marks  of  yearly 
 Tent  in  the  kingdom  ;  that  the  Lords  should  no 
 more  !)e  distinguished  into  temporal  -^unX  spiritual: 
 that  the  privy  < ouncil  should  be  accountable  to 
 his  Majesty  and  Parliament,    and  be  punishable 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  209 
 
 for  giving  wrong  counsel.  They  declared  null 
 and  void  all  unlawful  proclamations  issued  in  his 
 Majesty's  name,  since  the  commencement  of  the 
 late  troubles ;  and  that  the  ancient  acts  of  Parli- 
 ament forbidding  leagues  and  conventions  among 
 the  subjects,  did  not  extend  to  such  as  were  made 
 for  the  preservation  of  the  King's  life  or  authori- 
 ty, or  of  the  religion,  laws,  and  liberties  of  the 
 kingdom.  They  appointed  twelve  Noblemen, 
 sixteen  JBarons,  and  twelve  Burgesses,  as  a  com- 
 mittee  to  give  directions  concerning  the  impend- 
 ing war ;  and  appointed  a  tenth  of  all  land  and 
 house  rents,  and  a  twentieth  of  all  interest  of  mo- 
 ney, to  be  raised  for  carrying  it  on  ;  and  that 
 the  heirs  of  such  as  should  be  slain  in  the  defence 
 of  their  religion  and  country,  should  have  a  free 
 entry  to  what  belonged  to  them.  They  further 
 appointed  all  the  subjects  to  subscribe  a  bond  for 
 the  maintenance  and  defence  of  the  acts  of  this 
 Parliament ;  appointed  general  officers  for  their 
 army  ;  and  passed  a  sentence  of  forfeiture  upon 
 General  Ruthven  for  refusing  to  deliver  up  the 
 castle  of  Edinburgh,  and  for  the  daily  mischief 
 he  did  to  the  city.  After  nine  days  the  Parlia- 
 ment rose ;  and  their  committee  sent  a  copy  of 
 their  acts  to  Lord  Lanark,  secretary  for  Scotch 
 affairs — and  suggested,  that  if  the  violences  of- 
 fered to  their  persons  and  goods  without  the 
 kingdom,  were  not  quickly  repressed,  they  be- 
 hoved to  provide  for  their  own  deliverance 
 and  safety — and  assigned  the  reasons  of  their 
 conduct.  But  Charles  was  so  far  from  being  sa- 
 tisfied, that  he  considered  their  parliamentary  pro- 
 cedure as  a  blow  at  the  root  of  his  authority. 
 
 The  General  Assembly  met  at  Aberdeen,  July 
 28,   1640;  and,   after    enacting  some    rvlcs   Un- 
 it K 
 
210  A   COMPENDIOUS  HISTORV  OF  TIIF 
 
 the  orderini^  of  their  own  meetings,  they  ordain- 
 ed, I'hat  all  ni()?uinu'nts  of  idolatry,  particularly 
 in  the  North,  should  ho  destroyed;  that  the  laws 
 against  witches  and  charmers  should  be  carefully 
 executed;  that  such  as  should  speak  against  the 
 covenant  after  they  had  taken  it,  sliould  be  cen- 
 sured ;  that  candidates  for  the  ministry,  who  re- 
 fus(»d  to  subscribe  it,  should  be  declared  inca])a- 
 ble  of  teaching  children,  reading  in  kirks,  preach- 
 ing within  Presbyteries,  or  residing  in  burghs, 
 universities,  or  colleges — and  should  be  j)rocessed 
 as  scandalous,  if  they  continued  obstinate.  They 
 appointed  a  solemn  fast  upon  the  2Sth  of  August, 
 on  account  of  their  distressed  circumstances.  As 
 in  this  northern  Assembly  there  were  many  cler- 
 gymen, who  either  did  not  l)elieve  Prelacy  and 
 the  Articles  of  Perth  to  be  sinful  in  themselves, 
 or  were  unwilling  to  acknowledge  them  as  such, 
 they  did  not  attack  the  doctors  of  Aberdeen  in 
 their  adherence  to  these  ;  but  found  them  guilty 
 of  Arminianism.  Dr.  Forbes  was  spared  for  the 
 time,  on  account  of  his  ingenuity ;  and  Scroggs 
 on  account  of  his  health;  butSibbald,  tenaciosusly 
 adhering  to  his  errors,  was  deposed. 
 
 An  atfair,  relative  to  prarjing  societies y  gave 
 them  much  more  trouble.  During  their  want  of 
 faithful  ministers, many  serious  people,  in  Scotland 
 and  Ireland,  had  met  together  on  Sabbaths,  and 
 other  occasions,  for  prayer  and  spiritual  confer- 
 ence. Some,  before  they  were  driven  from  Ire- 
 land, had  been  a  little  infected  with  Brovnism 
 troiu  Kngland,  and  had  inclined  to  join  the  Inde- 
 penilents  in  New  Kngland.  'i'hese  brought  along 
 w  ith  them  some  of  their  singularities,  which  were 
 overlooked,  on  account  of  their  remarkable  piety, 
 till  an  a|)pcarancc  thereof  hapi)cned  in  the  charge 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  211 
 
 of  Henry  Guthry  of  Stirling,  afterward  worthless 
 bishop  of  Dunkeld.  The  Laird  of  Lecky,  a  man 
 remarkable  for  knowledge  and  serious  godliness, 
 and  who  had  been  a  distinguished  sufferer  under 
 the  late  bishops,  much  encouraged  fellowship 
 meetings  for  prayer  and  Christian  conference. 
 Several  of  his  neighbours,  who  could  not  read 
 themselves,  or  who  thought  his  manner  more  edi- 
 fying than  their  own,  attended  his  family  worship. 
 Some,  who  probably  came  as  spies,  alledged,  that 
 in  prayer  he  used  some  expressions  not  duly  ho- 
 nourable  to  Guthry  his  minister.  Guthry  imme- 
 diately prosecuted  Lecky  before  his  Presbytery, 
 and  got  fellowship  meetings  condemned  as  preju- 
 dicial to  the  standing  office  of  the  ministry,  and 
 got  the  magistrates  to  extirpate  them  from  the 
 place.  Not  satisfied  with  this,  he  laboured  to 
 have  them  utterly  abolished  from  the  nation  ;  and 
 by  collecting  and  exaggerating  reports  of  their 
 imprudences,  he  drew  Mr.  Henderson  and  Mr. 
 Calderwood,  who  had  seen  the  Brownistical  dis- 
 orders in  Holland,  and  some  other  leading  cler- 
 gymen, to  his  side.  In  the  Assembly  1638,  he  had 
 attempted  to  foist  in  a  complaint  against  these 
 meetings.  But  Messrs.  J.  Livingston,  S.  Ruther- 
 ford, and  D.  Dickson,  and  others,  unwilling  that 
 many  serious  saints  should  be  publicly  discredit- 
 ed for  the  imprudence  of  a  few,  got  the  affair 
 kept  from  any  public  hearing ;  and  it  was  agreed, 
 that  Guthry  should  preach  up  the  duty  of  family 
 worship,  upon  which  he  said  these  meetings  en- 
 croached, and  that  the  eminently  pious  Messrs. 
 Blair,  Livingston,  and  JM^Lellan,  who  befriended 
 such  societies,  should  preach  against  night  meet- 
 ings, and  the  abuses  complained  of.  Their  soft 
 4nd  Christian  methods  of  correcting  or  prevent- 
 
'Jl'J  A   (OMrENDIoas    IIISTOllY  01-    THE 
 
 iiii^  such  abuses  not  plcasini;  Guthry,  who  hated 
 to  sec  or  hear  of  any  others  more  serious  than 
 liimself,  he  continued  to  exclaim  aejainst  these 
 meetiui^s  in  general.  To  quench  this  flame  of  con- 
 tention, Messrs.  Henderson  and  liorthwick  u])ou 
 the  one  side,  and  Dickson  and  Blair  upon  the 
 other,  held  a  solemn  conference  on  the  i)oint.  Hen- 
 derson drew  up  a  paper  of  rt'gulaiiojis  or  caveats  for 
 such  meetings,  bearini^,  that  the  members  should  be 
 few,  and  such  as  were  proper  to  meet  together; 
 that  the  meetings  should  not  interfere  with  public  or 
 family  worshi])  or  relative  duties,  nor  be  held  in 
 the  night ;  that  they  should  be  ocasional,  and  no 
 wise  tending  to  separate  the  member  from  the 
 rest  of  the  congregation  ;  that  no  impertinent 
 (juestions  or  uncharitable  judging  of  others  should 
 lie  allowed  in  them  ;  that  if  any  members  in  th^ni 
 bad  any  objection  against  the  common  form  of 
 public  worship,  (as  Jtoiciug  in  the  pulpit,  and  sing- 
 ing the  Gloria  Pain)  they  should  discreetly  lay 
 them  before  the  persons  concerned ;  and,  finally, 
 that  all  things  relative  to  them  should  be  con- 
 ducted with  holiness,  prudence,  humility,  and 
 charity.  This  gave  general  satisfaction.  But 
 Ciuthry  and  his  assistants,  pretending  that  caveat:: 
 l)rought  in  bishops,  pushed  the  matter  into  this 
 northern  Assembly,  in  which  they  expected  their 
 friends  to  be  strongest.  Guthry  poured  forth 
 torrents  of  accusation  against  the  absent  Lecky, 
 and  the  society  meetings.  Simson  of  Bathgate 
 seconded  him  ;  and,  in  the  most  outrageous  man- 
 ner, U])braided  Rutherford,  Livingston,  and 
 M'Lelian,  as  encouragers  of  them.  Supported 
 by  the  Karl  of  Seaforth,  and  many  of  the  northern 
 clergy,  (Juthry  and  his  faction  thought  to  have 
 carried  an  act  for  the  utter  sujiprcssion  of  them. 
 
CilUUCIi  OF   SCOTLAND.  213 
 
 But  Dickson,  Bailie,  Rutherford,  and  others,  so 
 warmly  opposed  then!,  that  they  could  only  get 
 it  enacted,  That  people  should  observe  family 
 worship  with  the  members  of  the  family  alone ; 
 that  reading  of  prayers  is  lawful,  where  none  can 
 pray  extempore ;  that  none  but  preachers  shall 
 explain  scripture;  and  that  no  innovation  relative 
 to  the  time,  matter  or  manner  of  religious  wor- 
 ship, or  the  number  or  quality  of  joiners  in  it,  be 
 introduced  without  allowance  from  the  Assem- 
 bly. 
 
 Meanwhile,  Charles  and  the  covenanters  pre- 
 pared for  war  of  another  kind,  and  laboured  to 
 divert  the  blame  of  it  from  themselves.  Charles 
 loudly  complained,  that  they,  by  their  own  au- 
 thority, had  raised  forces,  provided  large  stores 
 of  artillery,  and  imposed  taxes;  that  they  had 
 published  scandalous  papers,  under  pretence  of 
 informing  the  English;  had  refused  materials  for 
 the  reparation  of  the  castle  of  Edinburgh  ;  had 
 committed  violence  upon  some  of  the  garrison, 
 and  prepared  to  block  them  up ;  had  imprisoned 
 Lord  Southesk  and  others  for  their  loyalty ;  had 
 written  to  the  French  King  for  assistance ;  and 
 that  the  magistrates  of  Edinburgh  had,  on  seve- 
 ral occasions,  refused  due  obedience.  The  cove- 
 nanters pled.  That  they  had  done  nothing  but 
 what  his  Majesty's  refusals  to  grant  their  just 
 and  humble  petitions  for  redress  of  grievances, 
 and  the  violences  committed  by  persons  pretend- 
 ing his  orders,  had  obliged  them  to ;  that  1;hey 
 had  granted  favours  to  those  in  the  castle  of  Edin- 
 burgli,  notwithstanding  the  unprovoked  injuries, 
 murders,  and  violences  which  they  had  suffered 
 from  them  ;  that  they  had  but  protected  South- 
 csk  and  his  followers  lioni  the  violence  of  (he 
 
21  i  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTOIIV  Ol-    THK 
 
 inol);  that  the  council  and  citizens  of  E(lin!)iir<(h 
 had  done  every  thin^  in  their  power,  as  faithlul 
 and  humble  servants ;  that  they  never  intended 
 to  ask  any  assistance  from  the  French  Kin^,  far 
 less  to  subject  themselves  to  his  authority,  but 
 merely  desired  to  prevent  his  taking  offence  at 
 them,  and  helpintj  to  destroy  them,  and  desii^ned 
 to  suj)|)li(ati'  his  mediation  in  their  favours,  in  or- 
 der that  an  unnatural  war  mif^ht  be  prevented; 
 that  they  had  never  sent  him  the  letter  referred 
 to,  nor  so  much  as  ever  directed  or  dated  it; 
 that  they  reckoned  it  a  notorious  breach  of  the 
 law  of  nations,  to  .have  their  deputies,  under  his 
 INFajesty's  safe  conduct,  imprisoned  by  him,  and 
 Loudon,  who  had  no  more  hand  in  the  above 
 mentioned  letter  than  others,  punished,  without 
 so  much  as  a  form  of  trial. 
 
 Ar/^yle  bein«j^  appointed  to  deal  with  the  disaf- 
 fected chieftains  and  clans  of  the  North,  invaded 
 the  territories  of  the  earl  of  Athol,  apprehended 
 himself  and  fourteen  other  principal  loyalists — 
 ami  obli«;cd  his  vassals  to  pay  the  contributions 
 required  by  theParliament,  together with.^l 0,000 
 Scrits,  for  the  support  of  his  army,  which  had 
 been  raised  on  their  account.  He  used  the  ter- 
 ritories of  Airly  in  much  the  same  manner.  But 
 it  doth  not  apj)ear  that  ever  he  allowed  any 
 thing  to  be  taken  IVom  the  people,  but  the  com- 
 mon tax,  and  that  which  he  found  necessary  for 
 the  subsistence  of  his  troops.  Robert  ^lonro, 
 >vho  was  (lis|)atc!ied  against  the  Martpiis  of 
 Huntley,  Earl  of  Aboyne,  and  Sir  James  Ogilvy 
 <»f  l>anir,  was  not  so  delicate,  lie,  at  his  own 
 hand,  imposed  the  covenant  upon  such  as  he 
 thought  disalVected,  and  remitted  about  forty  ol 
 the  ( ili/.ens  ol    Aberdeen  and  gentlemen  altuiit, 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  215 
 
 prisoners  to  Edinburgh,  *He  turned  Huntley's 
 palace  into  a  garrison,  and  destroyed  Sir  James's 
 mansion  house,  and  wherever  he  came,  seized  on 
 the  effects  of  the  royalists. 
 
 The  march  of  the  English  required  the  cove- 
 nanters to  meet  them  in  a  proper  place.  They 
 found  no  such  difficulty  in  levying  men  or  money 
 as  Charles  did.  Instigated  by  the  preachers, 
 every  fourth  man  was  ready  to  take  arms  on  a 
 call.  Such  as  had  money,  cheerfully  lent  it  up- 
 on the  public  security  of  the  Committee  of  Es- 
 tates, and  others  gave  their  silver  vessels  to  be 
 coined.  The  women  readily  contributed  their 
 yarn  and  cloth  for  the  service  of  the  troops,  in 
 tents  or  the  like.  In  their  march,  such  as  could, 
 carried  thirty  or  forty  days'  provision  along  with 
 them.  Every  regiment  had  a  minister  attending 
 it,  of  whom  Messrs.  Henderson,  Blair,  Livingston, 
 Bailie,  Cant,  and  G.  Gillespy  were  the  most  not- 
 ed. In  the  beginning  of  August,  they  assembled 
 at  Dunse,  about  25,000,  and  for  three  weeks  con- 
 tinued on  the  border,  learning  to  handle  their 
 weapons,  and  preparing  for  an  entrance  into  eter- 
 nity. At  their  appointed  times  for  private  wor- 
 ship, nothing  was  to  be  heard  but  singing  of 
 psalms,  reading  of  Scripture,  and  prayer  to  God, 
 in  their  tents.  At  first  the  covenanters  had  re- 
 solved not  to  enter  into  England.  But  the  Eng- 
 lish nobility,  having  informed  their  late  commis- 
 sioners at  London,  how  averse  their  nation  was 
 from  the  war,  and  encouraged  them  to  a  bold 
 prosecution  of  their  righteous  cause,  and  Lord 
 Sackville,  and  one  Darley,  having  written  letters 
 to  some  ol"  them,  in  name  of  a  number  of  the  Eng- 
 lish nobility,  whose  subscription  he  forged,  encour- 
 aging them  to  enter  England,  as  they  might  expect 
 
21(1  \   COMFKNDIOIJS    lUSTOUV  OF   THR 
 
 that  the  English  wouM  not  only  take  the  oppoi- 
 tiinity  to   insist  for  a  redress  of  their  own   anil 
 their  «^rievances,  but  wouhl  assist  them  witii  men 
 and  money,  as  soon  as  they  entered  Enghmd,  and 
 send  them    liome  liberally  recompensed  for  their 
 labour  ; — and    sometime   after,    havin*^  reeeived 
 another  letter  upbraidini^   them  for  their  slack- 
 ness to  enter  into  that  country,  and  sut^gestin«^, 
 that    it   had  lost    them  .ClO,000  Sterlin,!,',  which 
 was  prepared  for  them  ;  and  that  Charles's  troops 
 had   neither   money  nor   an  inclination   to  resist 
 them.       Knowing  that  there  was  much  truth  in 
 these  missives,  they  resolved  to  march  into  Eng- 
 land ;    but,  to  prepare  tiieir  way,  they  dispersed 
 two  dilVerent  i)apers  of  information, — in  the  first 
 of  which,   they   shewed,  That   their  march  into 
 England    was    necessary,   in    order   to  avoid  the 
 maintenance  of  two  armies  on  their  border,  aiul 
 to  secure  their   trade  and  the  administration  of 
 justice  at  home;  that  it  was  merely  defensive,  as 
 his   majesty's  promises   formerly  made   to   them 
 had  been  notoriously  violated,  and  their  commis- 
 sioners  refused   a   hearing  at  court,   till   a  war 
 against  them  was  resolved  upon  ;  that  the  Parlia- 
 ments  of  England  and  Ireland  had  been  conven- 
 ed to  grant  subsidies  for  making  war  upon  them  ; 
 that  his   majesty  had  already  begun  a  war  upon 
 them,  in  seizing  their  ships  and  goods,  and  in  the 
 murder  of  several   inhabitants  of  Edinburgh  by 
 his  garrison  in  the  castle  ;    that  they  were  ready 
 to  lay  down  their  arms  as  soon  as  they  could  ob- 
 tain a  sure  peace;  that  the  Lord,  by  their  march 
 into  England,  might  perhaps  lead  to  the  abolish- 
 ment of  I'relacy  there,  from  whence  it  had  come 
 totluiu;    that   they  did   not  march  against   the 
 kingilom    of    llngland,    but    against   Archbishop 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  217 
 
 Laud's  faction  of  Papists,  Atheists,  Arminians, 
 and  Prelatists,  who  misled  his  majesty,  and  were 
 enemies  to  both  kingdoms  ;  and  therefore  they 
 hope  their  English  brethren  will  not  refuse  them 
 victuals  for  money  ;  that  they  did  not  come  to 
 commit  disloyalty  against  their  sovereign,  or  to 
 enrich  themselves  with  plunder,  but  to  do  the 
 kingdom  what  good  they  could,  in  the  regular 
 punishment  of  those  that  had  troubled  them; 
 and  that  the  long  prayed  for  uniformity  in  refor- 
 mation might  be  promoted.  In  the  other,  they 
 shewed  what  injuries  had  been  done  them,  and 
 that  they  entered  England,  in  order  to  promote 
 the  regular  punishment  of  Laud,  Strafford,  and 
 other  incendiaries,  and  the  securing  of  their  own 
 religion  and  liberties.  And  they  engage  to  re- 
 turn home,  as  soon  as  these  ends  shall  be  gained. 
 God  rendered  the  day  of  the  covenanters'  so- 
 lemn fast,  Aug.  28th,  remarkable  for  a  strange 
 mixture  of  mercy  and  judgment.  On  it  their 
 troops  routed  about  five  or  eight  thousand  Eng- 
 lish, that  were  posted  at  the  ford  of  Newburn  to 
 prevent  their  passage  over  the  Tyne,  with  the 
 loss  of  about  twelve  persons,  and  the  wounding 
 of  a  few  others;  which  spread  such  a  terror 
 among  Charles's  army,  that  they  precipitantly  re- 
 tired from  Newcastle  and  places  about,  to  Dur- 
 ham. The  sickness  and  death  which  prevailed 
 in  the  castle  of  Dumbarton,  made  the  garrison 
 glad  to  deliver  it  up  to  the  covenanters.  The 
 English  garrison  of  Berwick  came  to  Dunse  with 
 a  considerable  number  of  carts,  to  carry  off  the 
 Scotch  artillery  and  ammunition  ;  but  the  earl 
 of  Haddington  coming  up  with  them,  sent  them 
 back  laden  with  nothing  but  their  own  dead  and 
 wounded.     Returning  to  the  castle  of  Dunglass, 
 
 2  F 
 
2\S  A   rOMPKNDIOUS   HISTORY  OP  THR 
 
 Ills  English  servant,  |)io])al)Iy  bribed  by  the  garri- 
 son of  Kerwick,  set  lire  to  a  magazine  of  powder, 
 and  blew  up  the  fort,  in  which  the  earl  and  his 
 brother,  ten  gentlemen,  and  fifty-four  servants, 
 instantly  perished  ;  and  about  thirty  others  were 
 grievously  wountled.  'J'he  alarm  given  by  the 
 noise,  made  the  people  in  Fife  and  Lothian  to 
 set  up  their  beacons.  Imagining  that  this  was 
 occasioned  by  the  king's  fleet  coming  up  tlu? 
 Forth  for  their  relief,  the  garrison  in  the  castle 
 of  Edinburgh  caroused  so  heartily  as  to  consume 
 most  of  their  provisions,  and  were  obliged  next 
 Sabbath  to  surrender  that  fort. 
 
 After  premitting  a  declaration  of  their  peace- 
 ful intentions,  the  covenanters  took  possession  of 
 Newcastle,  in  which  they  found  5000  stand  of 
 arms  : — And  while  Charles's  troops  fled  faster  be- 
 fore them  than  they  were  pursued,  they,  though 
 flushed  with  conquest,  in  an  humble  supj)lieation, 
 represented  to  him,  after  what  manifold  suifer- 
 ings,  necessity  had  obliged  them  to  march  into 
 England,  and  how  harmlessly  they  had  behaved 
 in  it,  and  earnestly  insisted  that  he,  with  advice 
 of  his  English  Parliament,  would  redress  their 
 grievances,  that  they  might  cheerfully  obey  him 
 as  their  native  sovereign,  and  his  throne  be  esta- 
 blished among  them.  Charles  had  treated  this 
 w  ith  the  utmost  contempt,  if  another,  subscribed 
 by  thirteen  of  the  English  nobility,  comj)laining 
 of  their  grievances,  and  insisting  for  redress,  had 
 not  been  presented  to  him  about  four  hours  after  ; 
 lor  which  the  lords  Howard  and  Wharton  had  been 
 immediately  shot  at  the  head  of  the  army,  had 
 not  Ihunilton  got  him  convinced,  that  it  would 
 occasion  a  general  mutiny,  if  not  total  revolt  of 
 the  troops.    Charles  proudly  disdained  to  answer 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  219 
 
 the  covenanters'  petition  himself,  but  being  afraid 
 of  their  approach  toward  his  camp,  lie  ordered 
 Lanark,  Hamilton's  brother,  to  require  them  to 
 mark  their  particular  grievances,  and  he  would 
 call  a  parliament  at  York  to  advise  an  answer  to 
 them  ;  and  to  command  them  to  march  no  far- 
 ther into  England,  if  they  wished  for  any  recon- 
 cilement. The  committee  of  their  army  quickly 
 replied  to  Lanark,  That  they  insisted,  that  the 
 acts  of  their  last  Parliament  should  be  published 
 in  his  Majesty's  name,  as  well  as  of  the  Estates ; 
 that  the  castles  and  forts  of  the  kingdom  should 
 be  used  for  their  security ;  that  none  of  their 
 countrymen  in  England  or  Ireland  should  have 
 any  oaths  imposed  upon  them  inconsistent  with 
 their  covenant ;  that  notour  incendiaries  should 
 be  brought  to  public  justice  ;  that  their  ships 
 and  goods  should  be  restored  with  recompense 
 of  damage  ;  that  all  the  w  rongs  which  have  been 
 done  to  them,  be  fully  recompensed  ;  that  all  pro- 
 clamations of  them,  as  traitors,  be  recalled  ;  that 
 all  garrisons  on  the  borders,  and  all  other  hinder- 
 ances  of  free  trade,  be  removed. 
 
 Last  year,  Montrose,  w^ho  had  been  once  a 
 zealous  covenanter,  instigated  by  his  envy  of  Ge- 
 neral Lesly's  promotion,  had  shewed  an  inclina- 
 tion to  desert  to  the  king  ;  at  this  time  a  treach- 
 erous letter  of  his  was  discovered.  But,  as  he 
 begged  forgiveness  of  his  rashness,  and  it  was 
 suspected  that  Lords  Drummond,  Boyd, Fleming, 
 and  some  others  were  also  unfaithful,  Lesly,  with 
 some  of  the  ministers,  got  the  matter  made  up, 
 that  no  breach  might  happen  in  so  critical  a  junc- 
 ture. As  the  English  doubly  rated  the  provi- 
 sions which  they  sold  to  them,  Lcsly  ordered  the 
 town   of   Newcastle   to   ad'ord   his   army   L.2U0 
 
220  A    COMrF-NDIOUS    lUSTOHV   OF  "^UK 
 
 worth  of*  victuals  a-day,  Northumljerland  L.300, 
 and  the  county  of  Durham  L.3.50,  for  ready  mo- 
 ney, orj^ood  security.  Hut  the  English  collectors 
 sometimes  exacted  the  double  of  what  tliey  <;ave 
 to  the  army,  and  laid  the  heaviest  burdens  on  the 
 j)uritans,  to  provoke  them  ai,^1inst  their  Presby- 
 terian brethren.  Knc^lish  vagabonds  put  on  blue 
 bonnets,  and  plundered  the  country  in  name  of 
 Scotsmen.  'J'he  servants  of  such  clergymen  as 
 had  run  olf  from  their  charges,  robbed  them  of 
 that  which  was  left  to  their  keeping,  and  then, 
 perhaps  by  their  master's  direction,  laid  the  blame 
 on  the  Scots.  Loud  complaints  of  these  things 
 were  made  to  Charles,  who  delighted  to  receive 
 them.  But  the  covenanters  quickly  manifested 
 their  innocence. 
 
 It  scarcely  appears,  that  Charles  really  intend- 
 ed a  pacification.  Instead  thereof,  he  laboured 
 to  increase  his  army,  jirocure  [)rovisions,  and  fur- 
 nish his  garrisons,  and  required  all  the  trained 
 hands  northward  of  the  river  Trent  to  be  ready 
 to  march  upon  a  day's  warning.  It  was  report- 
 ed that  Strailord  had  sent  for  ten  thousand  Irish 
 Papists  to  join  them.  Lesly  therefore  demanded 
 four  or  five  thousand  recruits  from  Scotland, 
 which,  with  a  band  of  gentlemen  from  Argyle- 
 shire,  immediately  marched  to  his  assistance. 
 Rut  the  English  peers,  meeting  at  York  upon 
 September  2 1th,  apj)ointed  eight  earls  and  as  ma- 
 ny lords  to  treat  with  the  Scots.  The  Earls  of 
 iMorton,  Traquair,  and  Lanark,  with  Sir  Lewis 
 Stewart  and  Ilenry  Vane,  were  appointed  their 
 assistants.  But  the  Scots  would  not  admit  them. 
 The  carls  of  Rothes,  Lowdon,  and  Dunfermline, 
 A.  Henderson,  and  Archibald  .b»hnston,  and  six 
 gentlemen,  were   commissioners  from   the   cove- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  221 
 
 iianters.  After  some  conferences  at  Rippon,  the 
 place  of  treaty  was  transferred  to  London,  and  a 
 cessation  of  arms  was  immediately  agreed  upon, 
 providing  that  the  Scotch  army  should  have 
 L.850  Sterling  j^er  day  allowed  them  for  subsist- 
 ence, till  the  treaty  should  be  finished ;  that  no 
 fortification  should  be  erected  on  either  side ; 
 that  the  river  Tees  should  be  the  boundaries  be- 
 tween the  two  armies,  unless  the  Scots  should  be 
 obliged  to  appoint  detatchments  to  collect  the 
 contributions  allotted  them  on  the  south  side 
 of  it. 
 
 After  several  months,  the  treaty  was  finished, 
 and  the  English  Parliament  ageed  to  it,  August 
 7,  1641.  It  imported.  That  all  the  acts  of  the 
 last  Parliament  at  Edinburgh  should  be  publish- 
 ed, and  have  the  same  force  of  law  as  any  other 
 acts  of  Parliament ;  that  all  the  forts  of  Scotland 
 should  be  furnished  with  the  advice  of  the  Es- 
 tates of  Parliament ;  that  all  censures  inflicted 
 for  taking  of  the  national  covenant  should  be  an- 
 nulled, and  none  hereafter  inflicted ;  that  only 
 such  Scots  as  settled  in  England,  should  be  sub- 
 jected to  the  laws  of  it ;  that  the  Parliament 
 should  have  full  power  to  prosecute  all  evil  coun- 
 sellors and  delinquents ;  that  none,  disqualified 
 by  sentence  of  Parliament,  shall  be  admitted  to 
 his  majesty's  service  or  friendship  ;  that  all  ships 
 and  goods  seized  by  either  party  be  restored, 
 and  damages  be  refunded  ;  that  L.30,000  Ster- 
 ling be  paid  to  the  Scots  to  indemnify  their 
 loss  in  this  war ;  that  all  proclamations  and 
 pamphlets  representing  them  as  7'cbels  or  z/;i- 
 dutij'ul  subjects,  be  recalled  and  suppressed,  and 
 their  loyalty  pul)lished  from  all  the  pulpits  in  his 
 majesty's  dominions,   upon  the   day  of  solemn 
 
2'i2  A   COMrKN'DIOUS   HISTOHV  OK   Till': 
 
 tlianksL;ivini;  for  the  peace;  that  the  t,^1lTisons 
 l)e  removed  i'rom  Herw  iek  and  Carlisle;  that  the 
 Scots  desire  of  an  iinifonnity  in  church  i^overn- 
 inent  and  worship  was  approved,  and  the  Eng- 
 lish Parliament  wouhl  proceed  in  that  matter,  as 
 they  found  most  conducihle  to  the  glory  of  God 
 and  the  [)eace  of  the  church  and  state  in  both  na- 
 ticHis  ;  tliat  his  majesty,  or  the  Prince  cjf  Wales, 
 shall  visit  Scotland  as  soon  as  possible  ;  that  he 
 ])refer  none  to  oflices  without  the  recommenda- 
 tion, or  at  least  consent  of  the  Parliament,  privy 
 council,  or  college  of  justice ;  that  some  Scots- 
 men he  placed  about  him  ;  and  none  but  such  as 
 are  of  the  reformed  religion,  about  either  himself 
 or  the  Prince  ;  that  all  that  hath  happened  in  the 
 late  troubles  be  buried  in  everlasting  oblivion, 
 except  that  the  Scots  bishops,  Traquair,  Sir  Ro- 
 bert Spotswood,  Sir  John  Hay,  and  JMr.  Walter 
 ]>alcan(piel,  shall  be  prosecuted  as  incendiaries ; 
 that  no  war  shall  !)e  declared  against  any  of  the 
 three  kingdoms,  but  with  consent  of  Parliament ; 
 and  such  as  without  such  consent  make  war  upon 
 their  fellow  subjects,  shall  be  prosecuted  as  trait- 
 ors by  both  nations  concerned  ;  that  the  Scotch 
 l\irliament,  which  shall  meet  to  ratify  this  trea- 
 ty, have  full  power  to  sit  till  they  finish  their 
 business,  unless  they  adjourn  with  their  own  con- 
 sent ;  and  that  none  who  commit  a  crime  in  one 
 ])art  of  his  ^Majesty's  dominions  shall  be  protect- 
 ed in  another. 
 
 Meanwhile,  the  Assembly  met  at  St.  Andrew's, 
 July  20,  IGtl  ;  but  adjourned  to  Edinburgh,  be- 
 cause many  of  the  nu^nbers  behoved  to  attend 
 the  approaching  Parliament.  Jn  favours  ol  31r. 
 1  lou  ie,  of  the  college  of  St.  Andrew's,  and  others, 
 they  enacted,  that  superannuated  ministers  should 
 
 3 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  223 
 
 eiijoy  their  benefices  for  life, — They  established 
 some  rules   for  the  universities,   and  appointed 
 every  Presbytery   to  maintain  a  bursar  at  the 
 college;  and  Mr.  Henderson  recommended  it  to 
 the  city  of  Edinburgh,  and  other  principal  burirhs, 
 to  maintain  some  students  of  distinguished  abili- 
 ties at  some  foreign  university,  as  thereby  them- 
 selves or  the  church  might  be  provided  to  the 
 greater  advantage.    They  appointed,  that  the  ut- 
 most care  should  be  taken  of  the  religious  conver- 
 sation of  candidates  for  the  ministry ;   and  that 
 none   should  be  allowed  to   preach   in  another 
 Presbytery,  without  testimonials  from  that  which 
 had  licensed  him.     The  flame  relative  to  fellow- 
 ship meetings  for  prayer  and  spiritual  conference 
 had  still  continued.     Lecky  and  his  friends  in- 
 sisted for  preferring  an  accusation  against Guthry, 
 their  leading  antagonist,   and   to  have  the  act  of 
 the  preceding  Assembly,  which  respected  their 
 meetings,  cancelled.     Guthry  and  his  partisans 
 were  no  less  eager  to  support  it,  or,  if  possible, 
 to  make  it  worse.     The  ministers  of  Edinburgh 
 were  generally  for  a  total  suppression  of  all  pri- 
 vate meeting  for  religion,  except  these  of  families. 
 IMany  of  the  citizens  were  no  less  zealous  to  pre- 
 serve praying  societies,  and  to  have  the  act  of  the 
 Aberdeen  Assembly  either  repealed  or  explained. 
 The  court  found   themselves   obliged  to  cancel 
 that  act,  as  if  it  had  never  existed,  and  to  substi- 
 tute another  in  its  room,  which  imported,  that 
 all  ministers  and  others  should  labour  to  restrain 
 all  impiety  and  all  mocking  at  religious  exercises, 
 or  casting  of  odious  names  upon  godly  persons; 
 and  that,  on  the  other  hand,  great  care  should  be 
 taken,  lest  under  pretence  of  religious  meetings 
 and  exercises,  errors,  scandal,  schism,  or  anything 
 
22  i  A    COMPRNDIOUS   HSTORY   OK  TIIR 
 
 contrary  to  peace  or  truth,  should  be  cherished, 
 or  the  duties  of  particular  callings  neglected;  and 
 api)ointed  that  Presbyteries  or  Synods,  should 
 censure  the  transgressors  of  this  on  either  hand. 
 By  another  act,  they  prohibited  tlie  introduction 
 of  any  novelty  in  doctrine,  worship,  or  govern- 
 ment, till  it  was  first  allowed  by  the  General  As- 
 sembly. Being  desired  by  the  Parliament,  they 
 examined  the  bond,  which  Montrose,  and  some 
 other  treacherous  covenanters,  had  subscribed, 
 and  of  which  the  Parliament  had  burnt  the  origi- 
 nal— and  declared  it  nnlazcful  and  unbinding,  as 
 it  was  contrary  to  their  former  engagements  to 
 do  nothing  without  common  consent,  and  as  it 
 tends  to  promote  division  :  but  gave  it  as  their 
 opinion,  that  such  subscribers  as  should,  under 
 their  hand,  accpiiesce  in  this  judgment,  should  be 
 no  further  troubled.  The  Lords  Seaforth,  Ring- 
 horn,  and  Laird  of  Lowr  immediately  complied, 
 as  did  most  of  the  other  subscribers  afterward. 
 They  offered  their  mediation  for  Montrose  and 
 some  other  su])scribers,  who  it  seems  did  not  sub- 
 mit; but  the  Parliament  refused  it. — Being  in- 
 formed that  the  Independents  at  London  pre- 
 tended tliat  Messrs.  Dickson  and  Cant  were  in- 
 wardly of  their  sentiments,  the  Assembly  unani- 
 mously declared  their  rejection  of  Independency 
 as  contrary  to  the  national  covenant;  and  appoint- 
 ed Mr.  Henderson  to  inform  their  London  friends 
 that  they  were  all  of  one  heart  and  soul  against 
 Inde[)endency,  as  well  as  against  Prelacy. — To 
 promote  an  easy  correspondence  with  the  reform- 
 ed churches  abroad,  they  appointed  the  Scotch 
 minister  of  Campvere,  in  Holland,  and  an  elder 
 from  his  session,  to  be  members  of  each  Assem- 
 bly.   Mr.  Henderson  having  moved  the  drawing 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  225 
 
 up  of  a  Confession  of  Faith,  Catechism,  Directori/ 
 for  Worship,  and  Form  of  Church  Government,  in 
 which  it  might  be  hoped  the  English  would  agree 
 with  them,  his  motion  was  embraced ;  and  Mr. 
 Dickson,  the  moderator,  and  such  assistants  as 
 he  pleased  were  enjoined  to  form  them.  But  he 
 resolutely  declined  the  task  as  too  difficult.  A. 
 committee  was  appointed  for  reforming  the  wild 
 Highlands,  and  the  Isles,  from  their  remaining 
 heathenish  and  Popish  abominations;  and  a  com- 
 mission to  finish  such  work  as  they  had  not  got 
 overtaken. 
 
 The  Parliament  of  1640,  had  been  adjourned 
 from  time  to  time,  till  July  15,  164^1,  when 
 thirty-nine  Noblemen,  forty-nine  Barons,  and 
 fifty-seven  Representatives  of  burghs  met ;  but 
 resolved  to  transact  no  important  business,  till  his 
 Majesty  should  come  down  in  the  following  month. 
 Nevertheless,  they  formed  overtures  for  regulat- 
 ing their  meetings.  They  concerted  measures  for 
 prosecuting  Traquair,  Sir  R.  Spotswood,  Sir  John 
 Hay,  Walter  Balcanquel,  and  Dr.-Maxwel,  late 
 bishop  of  Ross,  as  incendiaries  ;  and  Montrose, 
 Lord  Napier,  Sir  G.  Stirling  of  Keir,  and  Sir 
 Lewis  Stev/art  of  Blackball,  for  plotting  to  under- 
 mine their  fellow  covenanters.  A  scurrilous  libel 
 against  his  country,  and  in  defence  of  his  divisive 
 lK)nd,  drawn  up  by  ^lontrose's  direction,  was  read^ 
 and  he  was  required  to  subscribe  a  recantation  of 
 it.  Such  of  the  above  criminals,  as  could  be  ap- 
 prehended, were  imprisoned  ;  and  Lord  Loudon's 
 labour  to  excuse  them  as  far  as  he  could,  almost 
 rendered  himself  suspected. — It  plainly  appeared, 
 that  Montrose  had  slandered  the  Marquis  of  Ar- 
 gyle,  as  having  publicly  talked  to  Athole,  and 
 other  eight  of  his  late  prisoners,  that  he  and  hi? 
 
 2  G 
 
226*  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 friends  had  consulted  lawyers  and  divines  con- 
 cerning^ the  dethronement  of  his  Majesty,  and  had 
 thoiit^ht  of  doin^^  it  at  tlieir  preceding  Parliament, 
 hut  would  do  it  at  the  next. — Montrose  pive  up 
 Stewart,  commissary  ol"  Dunkehi,  as  his  informer, 
 who  at  first  acknowledged,  under  his  hand,  that  he 
 had  done  so.  But,  being  prosecuted,  he  said,  that 
 he  had  invented  the  story  out  of  mere  malice 
 against  Argyle;  and  that,  by  the  advice  of  Mon- 
 trose, Napier,  Keir,  and  Blackhall,  he  had  trans- 
 mitted a  sul)scrihe*i  copy  of  his  forged  speech  to 
 his  .Majesty.  They  also,  at  the  Assembly's  desire, 
 ordered  all  misrepresentations  of  the  covenanters, 
 to  be  razed  from  the  minutes  of  the  privy  coun- 
 cil. 
 
 Being  at  last  come  up  to  the  Parliament,  along 
 with  Prince  Frederick  Palatine,  his  nephew, 
 Charles,  after  his  speech,  offered  to  touch  with 
 his  sceptre  the  thirty- nine  acts  of  the  preceding 
 Parliament.  But  the  sagacious  members,  per- 
 ceiving that  he  thus  intended  to  mark  these  acts 
 as  formerly  destitute  of  legal  authority,  and  so 
 unhinge  the  late  treaty,  and  all  that  was  before 
 done  in  prosecution  of  these  acts,  warded  off  the 
 blow,  and  pled  that  the  validity  of  these  acts  had 
 l)een  already  secured  by  the  trcatij^  and  nothing 
 remained  for  his  Majesty,  but  to  consent  to  their 
 pubbcation.  Upon  the  18th  of  August,  they  en- 
 acted. That  all  the  members,  I)efore  taking  their 
 seals,  should  swear  the  national  covenant  nwd  hand 
 of  16^8,  as  explained  to  abjure  Prclacij  and  the 
 articles  of  Perth y  together  with  an  oath,  binding 
 them  to  reason  and  vote,  as  they  judged  most 
 conducive  to  the  glory  of  (iod  and  the  peace  of 
 this  church  and  kingdom,  and  to  defend  to  the 
 Uttermost  his  .Majesty's  person,  honour,  and  es- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  227 
 
 tate,  together  with  the  rights  of  Parliament  and 
 suhjects,  and  to  preserve  the  union  and  peace  be- 
 tween the  kingdoms  of  Scotland,  England,  and 
 Ireland ;  and,  by  all  proper  methods,  labour  to 
 bring  to  condign  punishment  all  such  as  had,  or 
 should  do  any  thing  contrary  to  the  purity  of  re- 
 ligion, or  the  laws,  liberties,  or  peace  of  the  na- 
 tion By  this  act,  they  hoped  to  exclude  all  the 
 malignants,  who  hated  the  covenanting  interest. 
 But  the  Duke  of  Lennox,  Marquis  of  Hamilton, 
 andEarlsof  Morton,  Roxburgh,  Annandale,  Kin- 
 noul,  Lauderdale,  Perth,  Lanark,  Galloway,  and 
 Dumfries,  after  some  demur,  yielded  to  the  terms, 
 and  so  the  number  of  Peers  was  increased  to  for- 
 ty-eight. Profane  Carnwath  alone  chose  rather 
 to  want  his  seat,  than  to  swear  oaths  which  he 
 had  no  intention  to  keep.  Charles  subscribed  the 
 treaty  of  Rippon  and  London^  and  the  Parliament 
 solemnly  approved  it  by  an  act,  which  they  trans- 
 mitted under  the  great  seal  to  the  Parliament  of 
 England.  That  same  day,  Charles  and  they  ap- 
 pointed the  thirty- nine  acts  of  the  Parliament 
 last  year  to  be  published  as  bearing  authority 
 from  the  moment  in  which  they  were  framed. 
 They  appointed  a  solemn  thanksgiving  on  the 
 7th  of  September,  of  which  the  General  Assem- 
 bly drew  up  the  reasons.  The  thanks  of  the 
 Parliament  were  given  to  the  commissioners,  who 
 had  formed  the  treaty ;  and  a  complimentary  re- 
 ward appointed  to  General  Lesly  and  IMr.  Hen- 
 derson. 
 
 The  malignant  enemies  of  the  pure  religion 
 and  full  liberties  of  the  kingdom,  cherished  by 
 Charles,  who  one  day  came  to  Parliament  at- 
 tended by  five  hundred  of  tliem,  laboured  to  tra- 
 .duce  the  .Marquises   of  Hamilton  and  Argyle, 
 
'J26  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTOHY  Oh    THE 
 
 But  the  affair  was  pot  compromised ;  and  even 
 INTontrose,  Napier,  Kcir,  Hlackliall,  president 
 Spotswood,  Hay,  and  .Monro,  who  had  deliver- 
 ed to  (ioram  the  letter,  which  had  occasioned 
 so  much  tr()ul)h^  and  dam^^er  to  Loudon,  were  li- 
 berated upon  security  for  their  ^^ood  behaviour, 
 and  their  compearance  for  trial,  before  the  com- 
 mittee of  Estates  in  January  next.  The  Parlia- 
 ment voted  10,000  men  to  Prince  Frederic,  for 
 enahline^  him  to  recover  his  Electorate  in  Ger- 
 many from  the  Popish  oppressors.  But  the 
 breakinf,^  out  of  the  Popish  massacre  of  the  Pro- 
 testants in  Ireland  prevented  the  execution  of 
 this,  and  obliged  his  Majesty  to  post  off  to  Lon- 
 don, as  soon  as  this  Parliament  ended.  The  Par- 
 liament appointed  a  solemn  fast  upon  2d  and 
 4th  Sabbaths  of  November,  of  which  the  Com- 
 mission of  the  Assembly  drew  up  the  reasons. 
 Another  fast  was  observed  in  the  ensuiui^  March, 
 but  by  whose  appointment  we  know  not ;  nor 
 that  any  general Jasl  or  t/ian/csgiring  was  observ- 
 ed, of  which  the  ehurch  did  not  at  least  draw  up 
 the  reasons.  They  also  enacted,  That  none 
 should  go  to  England  to  be  married,  without 
 proelamation  of  banns,  under  severe  penalties: 
 that  besides  formerly  required  qualifications,  all 
 patrons  should  subscribe  the  national  covenant; 
 that  all  monuments  of  idolatry  should  l)e  abolish- 
 ed, and  Presbyteries  should  see  to  have  them  re- 
 moved out  of  churches,  colleges,  cJiapels,  and 
 other  pid)Iic  places  ;  that  excommunicated  per- 
 sons, or  persons  who  did  not  communicate  at  their 
 ow  n  parish  church,  at  least  once  a-year,  should 
 be  pr«)S(Tuted  aceording  to  their  respective  ranks  ; 
 that  such  as  caused  their  mills  or  salt  pans  to  go, 
 or  hired  reapers,  or  sold  goods  on  the  Lord's  day. 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  229 
 
 or  otherwise  profaned  it,  should  be  severely  pu- 
 nished. They  disposed  of  the  Bishop's  rents 
 chiefly  to  the  universities,  and  to  some  nobility 
 and  gentry.  They  made  some  acts  for  payment  of 
 the  public  debt,  which  had  been  contracted  in 
 the  late  war,  and  in  favours  of  orphans  and  fa- 
 therless children,  and  for  the  administration  of 
 justice  and  encouragement  of  trade  and  manu- 
 factures. They  approved  the  conduct  of  Argyle, 
 now  made  a  Marquis  by  his  Majesty,  and  other 
 commissioners  in  the  late  war;  appointed  a  com- 
 mittee for  preservation  of  the  peace  between  the 
 two  kingdoms,  and  appointed  next  meeting  of 
 Parliament  in  June  1644<,  unless  his  Majesty 
 pleased  to  call  one  before  that  time. 
 
 Upon  Charles's  return  to  London,  his  bishops 
 loudly  reproached  him  as  undoing,  in  an  instant, 
 all  that  himself  and  his  father  had,  with  no  small 
 difficulty,  established  in  many  years.  The  differ- 
 ences between  him  and  his  English  Parliament 
 having  become  very  wide,  the  Scotch  commis- 
 sioners, who  had  gone  up  to  concert  measures 
 for  sending  their  troops  to  Ireland,  to  check  the 
 Popish  murderers,  who  about  that  time  massa- 
 cred two  or  three  hundred  thousand  of  their  Pro- 
 testant neighbours,  offered  their  mediation. — 
 Charles,  highly  displeased,  commanded  them  not 
 to  interfere  with  him  and  his  English  Parliament, 
 without  first  communicating  their  proposals  to 
 him.  Having  sent  off  6000  forces  to  Ireland, 
 under  General  Monro,  the  breaking  out  of  the  ci- 
 vil war  in  England  obliged  them  to  retain  the 
 other  4000  intended  for  it,  at  home.  By  the  in- 
 fluence of  Montrose,  and  other  Bonders,  Charles 
 laboured  to  cause  the  Scotch  privy  council  t(» 
 threaten  the  English  Parliament  with  their  as- 
 
230  A   COMTHNDIOUS   IIISTOIIV  OF  THK 
 
 sistancc  of  him  :    ])ut  the  covenanters,  by  theii 
 counter  sii|)|)lications,  prevented  it. 
 
 When    the    Assenihly   met    at   St.    Andrew's, 
 July  'J7,  HM-2,   a   report  lliat   Montrose  and  his 
 feUovv  Jiondcrs  intended  to  force  them  to  dechire, 
 that  the  national  covenant  favoured  the  making 
 of  war  upon  the  Kn^lish   ParliaFnent,   caused  so 
 many  of  tlie  covenanted  nohles  to  attend,  that  no 
 such  ihinir  durst  be  attempted.     The  Assembly 
 appointed   that    the    minutes   of    Synods  should 
 be  tried  by  the  Assembly  ;   that  transported  mi- 
 nisters should  not  undergo  new  trials  ;  that,  in 
 consequence  of  his  iMajesty*s  concession,  six  can- 
 didates for  a  vacant  charge  in  the  low  country, 
 ai.d  as  many  as  can  be  had  for  one  in  the  High- 
 lands, !)e  nominated  by  the  Presbytery,  with  con- 
 sent of  the  UKJst,  or  best  of  the  congregation,  to 
 tlic  patron,  out  of  which  he  must  present  one. 
 Argyle  and  some  other  patrons  offered  to  give  up 
 their  right  of  presentation,  if  ministers  would  pro- 
 mise to  insist  for  no  augmentation  of  stipends  ; 
 but  they  would  not  consent.    The  Assembly  also 
 established  some  rules  for  reclaiming  of  Papists, 
 non-communicants,    and   profaners   of   the    Sab- 
 bath,  and  for  family   worship,   catechising,  &:c. ; 
 and  for  (h  lating  of  adulterers,   wizards,  and  the 
 like,   to  the  civil  magistrate;  and  for  burdening 
 and  limiting  transportation  of  ministers  ;  and  for 
 .settling  of  sc!iools;  and  for  sending  over  ministers 
 to  the  remains  of  their  Protestant  brethren  in  the 
 north  of  Ireland,    who   had  earnestly  petitioned 
 for  them;  they  prohibited  the  taking  of  contrary 
 oaths  in  liic  purgation  of  adulterers,  fornicators, 
 and  the  like — and  all  slandering  of  ministers,  or 
 using  of  tlu  ir  names,    in    public   pa[)ers,  without 
 their  consent.     They  appointed   a  committee  to 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  231 
 
 visit  the  Isles  of  Orkney  and  Shetland,  in  order 
 to  reform  them  from  their  heathenish  and  Popish 
 corruptions,  and  to  regulate  the  universities  of  St. 
 Andrew's  and  Glasgow;  and  made  an  act  for  the 
 suppression  of  Popery,  and  monuments  of  idola- 
 try in  the  North.  They  erected  a  new  Presby- 
 tery at  Biggar,  and  joined  that  of  Sky  to  the  Sy- 
 nod of  Argyle,  They  appointed  a  general  con- 
 tribution for  the  Protestants  in  Ireland.  And, 
 as  both  Charles  and  his  English  Parliament  had 
 courted  their  favour,  they,  without  siding  them- 
 selves, urged  both  to  promote  a  reformation  of 
 England  in  public  worship  and  church  govern- 
 ment, and  supplicated  the  privy  council  to  concur 
 with  them  herein,  and  appointed  a  public  fast 
 and  prayer,  that  the  Lord  might  succeed  their 
 project. 
 
 Some  noblemen,  who  had  been  commissioned 
 to  beseech  his  Majesty,  to  give  satisfaction  to  his 
 English  Parliament,  being  very  ill  used  by  him 
 and  his  party,  and  the  letters  transmitted  to  them 
 broken  up,  were  therefore  recalled.  Meanwhile, 
 Hamilton,  Montrose,  and  other  Bonders,  finding 
 it  impossible  to  arm  the  nation  in  general  against 
 the  English  Parliament,  concerted  with  Charles 
 how  to  raise  an  army  in  the  North,  and  seduce 
 General  Monro  and  his  troops  to  their  party  ; 
 and  at  least  make  the  Earl  of  Antrim  accommo- 
 date matters  with  the  Irish  Papists,  and  then 
 transport  an  army  of  them  into  England  for  his 
 assistance  against  his  Parliament.  But  iMontrose, 
 refusing  to  serve  under  Hamilton,  their  reproach- 
 es of  each  other  manifested  part  of  their  de- 
 sign, and  the  rest  appeared  from  missives  found 
 upon  Antrim,  when  he  was  providentially  appre- 
 hended by  a  Scotch  officer  near  Carrickfergus, 
 
252  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  TlIP: 
 
 and  from  the  examination  of  him  and  his  servant. 
 Instigated  by  the  Popish  Queen,  Montrose  car- 
 ried on  his  work  in  the  North,  and  ^ot  all  the 
 chiefs,  ()i;ilvies,  and  (iordons,  to  substirilje  an  as- 
 sociation in  favours  of  Charles.  But  Lord  Mar- 
 shal refusini^toronrur,and  even  persuadini^ Hunt- 
 ley to  recal  his  sul»cription,  ^ave  a  rheck  to  this 
 project.  Montrose  therefore  courted  the  favour 
 of  the  covenanters,  who,  he  hoped,  would  put 
 more  trust  in  him  than  his  new  friends  had  done. 
 But  new  proofs  of  his  villany  made  them  also  to 
 despise  him. 
 
 Charles's  troops  had  almost  defeated  those  of 
 the  Parliament  at  Kd«^ehill,  in  October,  and  had 
 entirely  routed  them,  had  not  Balfour,  a  Scotch 
 officer,  with  his  battalion  at  the  head  of  the  foot, 
 made  a  i^^alhint  defence,  while  Prince  Rupert  of 
 the  Palatinate  drove  the  cavalry  before  him.  The 
 Scotch  managers,  laying  their  account  that  his 
 Majesty,  after  he  had  subdued  his  English  oppo- 
 nents, would  turn  his  victorious  arms  against 
 them,  ordered  Loudon,  their  chancellor,  to  issue 
 forth  warrants  for  callini;  a  convention  of  Estates, 
 in  order  to  put  the  country  into  a  proper  posture 
 of  defence.  Notwithstanding  all  that  Hamilton 
 and  Sir  Lewis  Stewart  could  say.  they  voted  them- 
 selves  a  legal  convention.  Charles  being  inform- 
 ed of  their  meeting,  by  his  missives  limited  their 
 dcli!)erations  to  the  supply  of  their  army  in  Ire- 
 land, the  procuring  of  the  arrears  due  to  them 
 from  the  Knglish,  and  the  preventing  of  ground- 
 less jealousies  of  himself,  and  restricted  them 
 troni  doing  any  thing  towards  raising  forces  for 
 the  Knglish  Parliament.  Instigated  by  the  Earl 
 of  Derby,  Morton,  Koxburgh,  Rinnoul,  Lanark.. 
 Anuandalc  and  Carnwath,  wrote  to   the  Queen, 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  233 
 
 that  unless  his  Majesty  detached  three  or  four 
 thousand  of  his  troops  to  Scotland,  that  country 
 would  probably  be  lost  to  him.  The  English 
 Parliament  having  intercepted  this  letter,  remit- 
 ted it  to  the  convention.  Upon  which  these  Lords 
 submitted,  and  promised  to  interfere  no  fur- 
 ther with  the  English  affairs,  and  were  all  excus- 
 ed, except  Carnwath,  who  appeared  to  have  ac- 
 cused his  countrymen  to  the  King  as  rebels,  and 
 their  commissioners  as  favourers  of  the  rebellion 
 in  England,  in  order  to  ruin  him  and  his  children. 
 He  fled,  and  was  fined  L.  10,000  Scots  for  the 
 public  service. 
 
 The  affecting  sermons  and  edifying  behaviour 
 of  the  Scotch  ministers,  who  had  attended  their 
 commissioners  at  the  making  of  the  late  treaty  at 
 London,  had  rendered  many  of  the  English  pu- 
 ritans fond  of  the  nearest  union  and  conformity 
 in  religious  matters  with  the  Scots.  A  correspon- 
 dence for  that  effect  had  ever  since  subsisted. 
 Their  distress,  since  the  battle  of  Edgehill,  had 
 rendered  a  league  with  the  Scots  most  necessa- 
 ry. After  some  warning,  the  commissioners 
 from  the  English  Parliament,  attended  by 
 JMessrs.  Marshal  and  Nye  from  the  Westmin- 
 ster Assembly,  came  to  Edinburgh  in  the  be- 
 ginning of  August  164^3,  in  order  to  solicit  an 
 amicable  and  religious  league.  Meanwhile,  the 
 Assembly  met  and  received  a  letter  from  C^harles, 
 indorsed  to  Sir  Thomas  Hope,  Lord  Advocate, 
 and  those  convened  with  him.  Notwithstanding 
 his  Majesty's  shyness  to  acknowledge  them  an 
 Asse?Mf/,  they  boldly  censured  the  ministers  of 
 Auchterarder,  for  refusing  to  publish  the  decla- 
 ration emitted  against  the  cross  petition  of  the 
 Bonders,  in  which  they  had  urged  the  priw  couu- 
 
 2h 
 
*23if  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORV  OF  Tllli 
 
 cil  to  publish  his  INIajesty's  reasons  lor  making- 
 war  on  his  English  Parliament,  without  publish- 
 ing their  vindication  aloni^  with  it.  Instii^ated  by 
 Archibald  Johnston,  who  had  lately  been  made  a 
 knii^ht,  they  suf^i^ested  to  tiie  Convention  of  Es- 
 tates, 'J'hat,  as  the  Kin^^'s  war  with  his  English 
 Parliament  was  directed  against  the  reformation 
 of  religion,  the  Protestant  faith  was  in  danger; 
 that  the  English  had  helped  them  in  their  dis- 
 tress ;  that  if  the  serious  part  of  the  church  of 
 England  be  ruined,  that  of  Scotland  cannot  ex- 
 pect long  to  survive;  that  the  intended  uniformi- 
 ty of  discipline  and  worship  between  the  two 
 kingdoms,  would  much  strengthen  the  Protestant 
 interest  in  general;  and  that  his  JMajesty's  actions 
 had  so  often  contradicted  his  promises,  that  they 
 could  not  trust  him.  They  enacted,  I'hat  pro- 
 fessors of  divinity,  being  ministers,  might  be  cho- 
 sen commissioners  to  the  Assembly,  either  by  the 
 university  or  Presbytery  ;  that  there  should  be  no 
 burials  in  churches  where  God  is  worshipped,  and 
 his  sacraments  dispensed.  They  appointed  a  new 
 supply  of  ministers  for  the  north  of  Ireland,  and 
 a  committee  to  incjuire  into  the  nature  and  pro- 
 per remedies  of  witchcraft,  for  which  many  about 
 this  time  were  delated  and  burnt;  and  that  mi- 
 nisters and  magistrates  should  search  for  all  books 
 calculated  to  promote  separation  from  pastors; 
 ami  that  all  sentences  of  supreme  judicatories 
 should  remain  in  force  till  repealed  by  themselves; 
 that  no  deposed  clergymen  should  be  rej)oned, 
 lait  by  the  advice  of  the  Assembly;  and  they  con- 
 tninedali  former  acts  for  the  sanctification  of  the 
 Sabbath,  and  that  masters  should  be  censured, 
 who  |)ermitted  their  servants  to  transgress. — As 
 the  customary  repetiiion  of  the  dodoiom/  and  Gh- 
 1 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  235 
 
 riapatri,  at  the  end  of  public  worship,  and  kneel- 
 ing in  the  pulpit,  had  offended  not  a  few  of  the 
 godly,  IMessrs.  Henderson,  moderator,  D.  Dick- 
 son, and  D.  Calderwood,  were  appointed  to  draw 
 up  a  directory  for  the  worship  of  God.  Finding 
 it  difficult  to  procure  candidates  with  the  Gaelic 
 ianguage  for  the  Highlands,  they  appointed  such 
 students  as  could  speak  it,  to  be  preferred  in  the 
 bestowing  of  burseries,  and  in  order  to  get  the 
 Highlands  and  Isles  supplied  as  well  as  the  low 
 country,  while  probationers  were  scarce,  they  be- 
 sought his  INIajesty  to  accept  of  a  list  of  three 
 candidates  for  a  vacancy  in  the  low  country,  and 
 of  one  in  the  Highlands,  in  order  to  a  presenta- 
 tion. All  the  commissioners  from  burghs  and 
 shires,  having  supplicated  an  abolishment  of  pa- 
 tronage, it  was  recommended  to  Presbyteries  to 
 devise  a  proper  plan  of  settling  congregations, 
 which  might  remove  all  contests  between  patrons, 
 Presbyteries,  and  people.  They  prohibited  all 
 ministers,  having  landed  estates,  to  sit  members 
 in  the  Parliament  or  Convention.  They  appointed 
 the  Earl  of  Huntley  to  be  admonished  for  his  ne- 
 glect of  family  worship,  his  not  communicating, 
 and  his  retaining  of  Popish  servants.  They  ex- 
 communicated Roger  Lindsay  for  blasphemy, 
 and  appointed  John  Seaton  to  put  from  his  house, 
 a  woman  with  whom  it  was  suspected  he  kept  a 
 criminal  correspondence.  They  agreed  upon  a 
 religious  and  solemn  covenant  with  the  English 
 Parliamentarians ;  and,  at  the  request  of  the 
 Westminster  Assembly,  appointed  IMessrs.  A. 
 Henderson,  R.  Douglas,  S.  Rutherford,  R.  Bailie, 
 and  G.  Gillespie,  ministers,  the  Earl  of  Cassilis, 
 Lord  Maitland,  afterwards  Earl  of  Lauderdale, 
 and  Archibald  Johnston,  now  a  lord  of  session,  by 
 the  name  of  Warrlsion,  ruling  elders,  to  join  them. 
 
236  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 After  the  Assembly  and  Convention  of  Estates 
 had  approvcil  of  the  .soh-mn  hague  a  fid  vovtuanty 
 it  was  transmitted  to  l^ondon,  and  with  some 
 small  alterations  approved  by  the  Assembly,  and 
 botli  houses  of  Parliame!U.  lieini^  remittt  d  to 
 E(linl)ur*;h,  the  Commission  ol  the  General  As- 
 sembly, C)ct.  1 1th,  apjiointed  it  to  be  sworn  and 
 subscribed  throiij;!!  the  whole  cliurch,  and,  by 
 missives  to  Pie.sl)yteries,  directed  them  how  to 
 forward  the  same.  In  consequence  hereof,  the 
 (^ommittee  appointed  by  the  Convention  of  Es- 
 tates next  day  a])pointed  it  to  be  sworn  and  sub- 
 scribed by  all  the  subjects,  under  pain  of  beini^ 
 held  and  punished  as  enemies  to  relig-ion  and  his 
 majesty's  lionoui,  and  peace  of  the  kint^doms, 
 and  to  have  their  goods  confiscated  for  the  use 
 of  the  public,  and  not  to  be  allowed  to  enjoy  any 
 benefit,  j)lace,  or  office  within  the  kini;doin,  and 
 appointed  sherifls  and  other  magistrates,  to  as- 
 sist ministers  in  promoting  this  engagement.  As 
 this  and  some  other  deeds  of  this  period  imjiosing 
 their  covenants  under  such  penalties,  cannot  be 
 justified,  it  is  agreeable  to  find  none  but  Mon- 
 trose and  Monro,  two  military  men,  one  of  whom, 
 at  least,  afterward  turned  a  murderer  of  his  bre- 
 thren, yo/c/YVj/  urging  these  covenants.  Every 
 where,  the  solemn  league  being  read  the  one  Sab- 
 bath, it  was,  with  marvellous  unanimity,  sworn 
 the  next,  by  both  men  and  women,  and  subscrib- 
 ed chiefly  by  men.  Nor  do  I  find,  that  the  de- 
 cliners  of  it  ever  suffered  in  the  least  for  so  doing. 
 
 Nov.  ijf^,  I61-3,  the  Committee  of  Estates  and 
 commissioners  from  England  finished  their  trea- 
 ty ul  friendship.  !)earing.  That  the  solciiui  Ica^i/i: 
 and  (uwiuint  should  be  sworn  and  subscrilied 
 by   all  riiidvs    in    both    kingdoms;    that    K^,000 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  237 
 
 foot,  and  3,000  horse  should  immediately  march 
 to  the  assistance  of  the  English  Parliament,  with 
 victuals  and  pay  for  the  space  of  forty  days  ;  that 
 this  army  should  be  commanded  by  a  Scotch  ge- 
 neral, but  subject  to  the  direction  of  the  two  Far- 
 liaments,and  their  committees;  that  the  whole  ex- 
 pences  contracted  by  the  Scots,  should  be  repaid 
 to  them  at  the  end  of  the  war ;  that  their  army 
 should  receive  L30,000  SterHng  per  month  out 
 of  the  estates  of  the  English  papists  and  other 
 malignants,  and  have  1^.100,000  per  advance; 
 that  the  Scots  shall  assist  with  their  credit  in 
 raising  L.200,000  for  that  purpose,  and  for  pay- 
 ment of  their  troops  in  Ireland,  whicli  shall  be 
 repaid  them  at  the  end  of  the  war  ;  that  no  paci- 
 fication shall  be  made  with  his  majesty,  without 
 the  consent  of  both  kingdoms  ;  that  the  Scotch 
 troops  in  England  shall  be  no  v/ise  employed, 
 but  to  ansvv^er  the  ends  of  this  treaty  ;  that  the 
 English  shall  assist  the  Scots  in  any  like  extre- 
 mity ;  and  that  eight  ships  shall  protect  their 
 coasts  and  trade. 
 
 In  January  i64^i,  the  Scots  army, to  the  amount 
 of  21,500,  marched  into  England,  under  the  com- 
 mand of  old  General  Lesly,  now  earl  of  Leven, 
 and  John  Bailie  lieutenant-general  of  the, horse, 
 and  David  Lesly  of  the  foot ;  and  notwithstand- 
 ing the  Independents  giving  the  honour  to  Crom- 
 v/ell,  who  had  perhaps  gone  off  in  his  wounds, 
 had  the  principal  hand  in  gaining  the  famous  vic- 
 tory of  Marston  Moor, in  which  Charles  lost  about 
 ten  thousand  of  his  forces,  and  all  his  baggage. 
 To  oblige  them  to  return  home,  that  Charles 
 might  at  least  recover  the  west  of  England,  Mon- 
 trose, Crawford,  Nithsdale,  Aboyne,  ()gilvy,  Rao, 
 Herreis,  he.  entered  into  an  association  at  Ox- 
 
I?JS  A  coMPKNniors  history  of  THF 
 
 ford,  to  return  to  Scotland,  and  raise  forces  for  his 
 majrsty.  Antrim  undertook  to  send  them  10,000 
 Irish,  under  the  crunniand  of  Alexander  ^TDon- 
 ald,  a  Scot.  Huntley  took  the  field  with  a  con- 
 piderahle  body,  which  Ar^yle  quickly  suppressed. 
 In  ri'lurninLr  northward,  through  Westmoreland, 
 IMontrose  raised  a  body  of  forces,  and  set  up  his 
 majesty's  standard  at  Dumfries.  Hut  the  She- 
 riff of  Teviotdale  marchinf^  a  body  of  country- 
 men toward  them,  they  fled  at  the  sifrht,  and 
 IMontrose  himself  escaped  to  Carlisle.  I'he  com- 
 mission of  the  General  Assembly  laid  him  under 
 the  lesser  excommunication,  and  ordered  it  to 
 be  published  fiom  all  the  pulpits  in  the  kingdom. 
 Exasperated  l)y  this,  he  pushed  his  way  north- 
 "uard  alon^-  with  two  others,  and  put  himself  at 
 the  head  of  the  Irish  ragamuffins,  who,  in  smal- 
 ler numbers  than  was  expected,  had  just  landed 
 in  Argyleshirc,  where  they  committed  the  most 
 barbarous  ravages  upon  ministers  and  others, 
 whom  they  looked  on  as  most  hearty  in  the  cove- 
 iianling  interest.  lie  conducted  them  eastward 
 through  Badenoch  and  Athole,  where  many  join- 
 ed them,  and  in  Perthshire,  a  whole  regiment 
 raised  by  lord  Kilpont.  Argyle,  with  a  body  of 
 undisciplined  countrymen,  thought  to  attack 
 thcni  :  but  .Montrose  fell  upon  them  before  they 
 were  ready  ;  and,  especially  in  their  flight,  killed 
 many  of  them.  After  ravaging  Argyleshire,  and 
 turning  it  into  a  kind  of  desert,  he  marched  to- 
 ward Lochaber  and  (ilenco,  in  order  to  collect 
 his  friends  in  that  country. 
 
 Meanwhile,  the  Scotch  commissioners  to  the 
 Westminster  Assembly  were  but  coldly  received 
 by  many  ;  nor  till  after  a  warm  debate,  were 
 they  allowed  to  be  members.    But  after  their  ad- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  239 
 
 mission,  much  deference  was  paid  to  their  judg- 
 ment ;  and  they  had  no  small  hand  in  promoting 
 of  Presbyterian  government.  None  of  them 
 made  a  more  shining  appearance  than  Gillespy 
 the  youngest.  The  General  Assembly,  meeting 
 at  Edinburgh,  in  May  16i4',  received  letters  from 
 the  Presbytery,  which  attended  the  army  in  Eng- 
 land,— from  tbeir  commissioners  at  London, — 
 and  from  the  Westminster  Assembly, — together 
 with  petitions  from  Ireland  for  supply  of  minis- 
 ters,— to  all  which  they  returned  favourable  an- 
 swers. They  declared  the  bond  of  association  at 
 Oxford  framed  by  Montrose  and  his  fellow  cove- 
 nant breakers,  perfidious^  and  calculated  to  throw 
 this  church  and  kingdom  into  confusion  ;  and 
 empowered  their  commission  to  })roceed  against 
 all  that  entered  into  it  to  the  highest  excommu- 
 nication, unless  they  should  publicly  acknowledge 
 their  offence.  They  appointed  ministers  to  de- 
 late to  their  Presbyteries,  all  such  as  manifested 
 dissatisfaction  to  the  covenanted  cause.  They 
 wrote  to  the  churches  in  Holland,  thanking  them 
 for  sending  supplies  of  money  to  their  distressed 
 brethren  in  Ireland,  and  informing  them  of  their 
 own  critical  circumstances  and  covenant  with 
 God.  They  appointed  ministers  to  be  more  dili- 
 gent in  raising  the  fines  annexed  by  law  to  scan- 
 dals, and  applying  them  to  pious  uses.  They  ap- 
 pointed a  contribution  in  favours  of  their  Protes- 
 tant brethren  in  Ireland,  and  gave  order  for  sup- 
 plying their  armies  with  ministers;  and  appoint- 
 ed a  solemn  fast  to  confess  their  sins,  lament 
 their  miscM'ies,  and  supplicate  relief  from  God. 
 
 The  Parliament  meeting,  June  4th,  made  a 
 number  of  acts  for  preventing  the  desertion  of  their 
 troops,  and  for  levying  others  with  proper  expe- 
 
240  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTOIIY  OF  THE 
 
 dition  ; — for  decLaring  it  treasonable  to  take  arms 
 or  hold  out  houses  a<;ainst  the  Estates ; — for  ra- 
 tification of  the  late  cunvcnlion  and  committee  oj 
 Estates,  and  their  acts,  particularly  these  which 
 approved  and  imposed  the  solemn  league  and  co- 
 venant ; — for  a])pointing  commissioners  for  pro- 
 moting peace  between  his  Majesty  and  Parliament, 
 upon  proper  terms; — for  paying  to  the  burghs  the 
 debts  owing  them  for  arms  and  ammunition; — for 
 approving  the  conduct  of  Argyle  and  Burleigh, 
 in  suppressing  the    northern  insurrections  ; — for 
 preventing  the  profanation  of  the  Sabbath,  and  of 
 public  fasts,  by  captions  for  debt  or  the  like; — for 
 granting  divorces,  when  shrewd  tokens  of  adultery 
 are  proven; — for  prohibiting  fares  and  markets 
 on  Mondays  ; — for  restraining  innkeepers  from 
 unnecessary  selling  of  drink  on  the  Lord's  day; — 
 for  prohibiting  patronages  belonging  to  particular 
 ministers;  for  preventing  application  of  vacant 
 stipends  to  private  uses  ; — for   securing  to  mini- 
 sters, universities,  hospitals,  and  schools,  the  re- 
 venues belonging   to    them  from    the  estates  of 
 forfeited  malignants; — for  renewing  the  commis- 
 sion for  valuation  of  the  tithes  and  assignations  of 
 manses  and  glebes  to  ministers  ; — for  carrying  on 
 the  war  against  Montrose  and  other  enemies,  and 
 supporting  of  such  as  shall  be  disabled  in  it;  and 
 for  continuing  the  commission  for  conservation  of 
 the  peace  with  England,  a])pointed  b}'  the  former 
 Parliament,  non-covenanters  excepted. 
 
 When  the  Assembly  met  in  January  1645, 
 they  approved  the  directonj  for  public  worship 
 framed  by  the  Westminster  Assembly,  with  some 
 explications  and  limitations  ;  as  also  some  over- 
 tures for  the  .advancement  of  learning  in  schools 
 and  colleges,  and  for  the  maintenance  of  bursars. 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  241 
 
 They  authorised  their  commission  to  approve  the 
 Westminster  directory  for  church  government,  and 
 ordination  of  ministers,  leaving  room  to  examine, 
 whether  doctors  have  power  to  administer  the  sa- 
 craments? and  what  are  the  respective  rights  of 
 Presbytery  and  people,  in  the  calling  of  ministers? 
 They  emitted  a  solemn  warning,  calling  all  ranks 
 to  a  proper  improvement  of  God's  great  mercies 
 and  alarming  judgments,  and  appointed  that  all 
 such  ministers  as  did  not  read  it  from  their  pul- 
 pits, should  be  censured.  They  prohibited  the 
 observation  of  Christmas,  and  other  superstitious 
 days,  the  abuses  at  penny  weddings,  and  the  re- 
 poning  of  deposed  ministers  to  their  former  char- 
 ges. They  represented  to  his  Majesty  his  great 
 wickedness,  in  permittmg  the  Irish  invaders,  un- 
 der his  commission,  to  exercise  cruelty  upon,  and 
 murder  multitudes  of  his  best  subjects  ;  in  his 
 permission  of  Popish  idolatry  in  his  family  and 
 kingdom ;  in  his  authorising  the  hook  of  sports, 
 and  profanation  of  the  Lord's  day  thereby  encou- 
 raged ;  in  his  neglecting  to  punish  the  notorious 
 scandal  and  profane  behaviour  of  his  court ;  his 
 stopping  of  his  ears  against  the  petitions  of  his 
 faithful  subjects;  his  compliance  with  Papists,  and 
 concluding  an  advantageous  cessation  of  arms  with 
 the  massacrers  in  Ireland ;  and  in  his  following 
 the  counsels  of  wicked  men,  and  opposing  the  re- 
 formation of  his  kingdom.  They  encouraged  their 
 commissioners  at  Westminster,  further  to  pro- 
 mote the  religious  uniformity  between  Scotland 
 and  England,  and  appointed  Mr.  Henderson  to 
 assist  the  English  commissioners,  in  the  religious 
 part  of  the  treaty  at  Uxbridge,  with  his  INIajesty. 
 They  appointed  ministers  to  attend  their  eleven 
 
242  A  COMfENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 new  reginu'nts,  and  others  to  supply  their  Pro- 
 testant brethren  in  Ireland. 
 
 The  Parliament,  meeting  at  Edinburgh  on  the 
 24'th  oi"  the  same  month,  appointed  an  augmen- 
 tation of  ten  or  twelve  thousand  men  to  their  ar- 
 my, intended  to  reduce  Montrose  and  his  fol- 
 lowers ;  and  made  a  number  of  acts  for  defray- 
 ing the  expenses  of  the  war ;  and  for  putting  the 
 country  into  a  posture  of  defence,  by  mustering 
 all  men  between  1 6  and  (JO,  on  one  day,  that  they 
 might  see  what  arms  or  men  were  wanting,  and 
 might  train  such  as  appeared  in  the  military  ex- 
 ercises.— Montrose  took  Dundee  by  storm,  and  set 
 it  on  fire  in  several  places  ;  and,  about  the  same 
 time,  murdered  multitudes  in  St.  Andrew's  and 
 Kirkaldv,  almost  in  cold  blood,  rendering  two 
 hundred  women  widows  in  one  day.  Finding 
 that  the  covenanters'  troops  were  divided  into 
 two  bodies,  he  first  attacked  the  weaker  under 
 Urie,  and  then  the  stronger  under  Bailie,  and 
 routed  them  both.  The  Parliament  being  there- 
 fore obliged  to  meet  again  in  July,  a  raging  pes- 
 tilence kept  them  from  Edinburgh,  and  drove 
 them  from  Stirling  to  Perth.  They  appointed  a 
 new  levy  of  ten  thousand  troops  to  withstand 
 IMontrose;  and  devised  methods  for  paying  them. 
 They  ratified  the  Assembly's  act,  approving  of 
 the  VVesminster  directory  for  public  worship  ;  and 
 under  penalties  suited  to  men*s  difterent  ranks, 
 prohibitid  profane  swearing,  drunkenness,  and 
 mocking  at  religion  ;  and  ai)pointed  deputies  in 
 eve  ly  parish  to  levy  fines  imposed  for  scandals, 
 and  to  punish  the  scandalous  in  their  persons. 
 
 Finding  that  the  covt  nanted  forces  were  assem- 
 bled at  Perth,  Montrose  attempted  to  ])ush  south- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  243 
 
 ward,  to  favour  his  junction  with  a  body  of  horse, 
 which  he  expected  from  his  Majesty  :   and,  to 
 draw  off  Bailie's  attention,  M'Donald,  with'liis 
 Irish,  fell  upon  the  Campbells,  near  Cupar  An- 
 gus, murdering  all  that  he  met  with.    But  Bailie 
 still  hanging  close  to  him,  Montrose  was  obliged 
 to  return  northward,  once  and  again,  to  levy  more 
 troops.     At  last,   when  the  covenanters'  newly 
 raised  forces  had  gone  home,  he  marched  up  to 
 the  Bridge  of  Erne,  in  order  to  attack  their  remain- 
 ing army.     But  they,  expecting  reinforcements 
 from  Fife,  would  not  stir  from  their  entrench- 
 ments.   He  therefore  marched  southward  by  Kin- 
 ross ;   and,   then  turning  westward  to  Stirling, 
 burnt  into  a  desart  the  parishes  of  Muckart  and 
 Dollar,  which  pertained  to  Argyle.    Informed  of 
 his  motions,  the  covenanters  marched  the  near 
 way  to  Stirling,  burnt  the  houses  of  Menstry  and 
 Airthry,  which  belonged  to  malignants ;  but  did 
 no  hurt  to  their  tenants ;  and  came  up  with  him 
 at  Kilsyth,  August    15,    1645,   where  he  gave 
 them  battle  before  their  expected  western  assist- 
 ants came  up;  and,  with  very  small  loss  on  his 
 side,  killed  most  of  their  troops,  giving,  it  is  said, 
 no  quarter  to  such  as  offered  to  surrender     Ter- 
 rible was  the  havock  made  in  the  pursuit;  and 
 terrible  the  case  of  the  nation,  in  consequence  of 
 It — many  thousands  having  lost   their  fathers, 
 brothers,  or  children.    While  the  covenanting  no- 
 bles and  gentry  fled  oflf*  to  England  and  Ireland, 
 Montrose  took  up  his  head  quarters  at  Bothwcl, 
 and,  by  detachments  of  his   troops,   relieved  his 
 friends,  and  raised  contributions  from  Edinbugh 
 to  the  Western  Ocean.    The  malignant  noblemen 
 flocked  about  him  ;  and  Charles  sent  him  a  com- 
 mission, appointing  him  Captain  Genera),  and 
 
2U  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 Deputy  Governor  of  Scotland ;  and  empowered 
 hini  to  call  a  Parliament,  and  create  Knii^hts 
 to  sit  in  it.  By  proclamations  at  Kilinhurijli,  I.in- 
 litli»;o\v,  aii(l(.la>i;o\v,  he  summoned  a  I'arliaincnt 
 to  meet  at  (ilas^ow,  on  the  'JOth  of  October  en- 
 suin^^,  and  made  M'Donalil,  his  murderous  lieute- 
 nant, a  Knight. 
 
 Amidst  their  distress,  envy  of  pref 'rments  and 
 carnal  stupidity  had  fearfully  prevailed  among 
 the  covenanters;  and  not  a  few,  amidst  the  licen- 
 tiousness of  war,  had  become  openly  profane. 
 Tlie  raging  pestilence,  and  the  six  bloody  defeats 
 they  had  received  from  Montrose,  together  with 
 the  alarming  sermons  of  their  faithful  ministers, 
 awakened  them  not  a  little.  Finding  no  help  in 
 man,  and  that  their  apostate  and  barbarous  ene- 
 my carried  all  before  him,  they  betook  themselves 
 to  solemn  lasting  and  prayer;  and  the  Lord  quick- 
 ly appeared  for  their  relief.  Intending  to  join 
 him  with  all  the  forces  they  could  collect,  the 
 Earls  of  Home  and  Koxburgh  invited  IMontrose 
 to  march  towards  the  south-east  of  Scotland.  To 
 favour  their  junction  with  him,  he  took  up  his  head 
 quarters  at  Philiphaugh,  beside  Selkirk.  jNIean- 
 w  bile  David  Lesly  and  Colonel  Middleton  march- 
 ing N\  ith  part  of  the  Scotch  army  from  England, 
 aj)prehended  Home  and  Koxburgh;  and  then  took 
 tlicii  route  by  Dunglass  and  Haddington,  where 
 none  watched  their  motions;  and  then  suddenly 
 turning  southward,  through  the  favour  of  the 
 night  and  mist,  unexpectedly  fell  upon  Montrose's 
 army,  from  which  the  (Gordons  and  M'Donalds 
 liad  lately  gone  home  with  their  j)luiider,  and 
 killed  or  took  prisoners  the  most  of  them.  'J'he 
 most  malignant  of  the  prisoners  N\ere  tried  and 
 executed  as  traitors  and  muiderers.      The  iMai- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  245 
 
 quis  of  Douglas,  with  other  Lords  and  Gentle- 
 men of  the  low  country,  made  their  peace  with 
 the  Committee  of  Estates.  D.  Lesly  returned 
 with  his  army  to  England,  and  left  iMiddleton, 
 with  the  horse,  to  pursue  Montrose,  who  had  got 
 back  into  Athole.  M'Donald,  with  his  Irish  mur- 
 derers, continued  ravaging  Argyleshire;  putting 
 almost  every  thing  to  fire  or  sword.  ArdingUiss 
 conducted  about  twelve  hundred  of  the  poor  in- 
 habitants to  Monteith,  to  live  upon  the  JMalig- 
 nants.  But  Inchbrake  and  the  Athole  men  fall- 
 ing upon  them  at  CaJlender,  killed  not  a  few  of 
 them,  and  forced  the  rest  to  flee  towards  Stirling. 
 Argyle  carried  them  thence  to  Lennoxshire,  to 
 live  upon  the  lands  of  Lord  Napier,  and  other  ma- 
 lignants.  He  then  brought  over  a  part  of  the 
 army  from  Ireland,  at  whose  landing  in  his  coun- 
 try, M'Donaldand  his  Irishmen  fled  to  the  West- 
 ern Isles,  and  thence  into  Ireland.  IMontrose, 
 having  got  northward,  formed  a  new  association 
 with  the  Earls  of  Seaforth  and  Sunderland,  Lord 
 Lovat,  and  a  great  many  other  of  the  principal 
 chiefs.  But  the  ecclesiastical  commission  hav- 
 ing published  a  declaration  against  this  league ; 
 and  the  committee  of  Estates  an  indemnity  to  all 
 such  as  should  desert  it,  except  the  Earl  of  Sea- 
 forth ;  and  Middleton  marching  northward  with 
 his  troops,  all  the  subscribers,  except  Seaforth, 
 quickly  disclaimed  the  bond,  and  several  of  them 
 professed  their  sorrow  for  joining  in  it.  Charles 
 having  fled  into  the  Scotch  army  in  England,  or- 
 dered JMontrose  to  lay  down  iiis  arms:  upon  which 
 he  retired  into  Germany,  and  assisted  the  Emper- 
 or in  oppressing  and  murdering  the  Protestants. 
 Meanwhile,  the  Parliament,  which  met  at  St. 
 Andrew's  in  the  end  of  November  164J,  made  a 
 
'216  A  COMPENDIOCS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 variety  of  acts — for  approviiifj^  the  conduct  of 
 (^ien'Tal  Bailie  and  the  Lords  Monti^oinery  and 
 Sinclair,  at  the  battle  of  Kilsyth,  and  for  levying 
 new  taxes  and  forces  for  suppressing  the  mali^^- 
 nants; — for  the  relief  of  such  as  had  Ijcen  plun- 
 dered by  Montrose  and  Ids  party,  and  fur  punish- 
 \l^^  <»f  the  principal  prisoners  that  had  been  ta- 
 ken at  Philiphauqh.  They  prohibited  all  hold- 
 in"^  of  lairs  on  Mondays  or  Saturdays,  and  all 
 printing"  of  books  relative  to  religion,  without 
 a  licence  from  the  Assembly  or  Commission,  or  of 
 others  without  a  licence  from  his  Majesty's  secre- 
 tary ; — and  all  lykewakes  under  pain  of  L.20 
 Scots  for  each  fault :  and  appointed  Presbyteries 
 to  have  the  sole  |)ower  of  planting-  vacant  parish- 
 es, the  patrons  of  which  are  excommunicated, 
 or  have  not  sworn  the  covenant;  and  that  schools 
 l)e erected  \n  evciy  |)arish,  with  a  salary  not  below 
 100,  and  not  above  200  merks  Scots,  besides  usual 
 percjuisites  ;  and  appointed  a  Committee  of  Es- 
 tates to  manage  the  government  of  the  nation 
 »luring  the  interval  of  Parliament,  the  members 
 of  which  are  allov/ed  a  salary  for  their  work. 
 
 When  the  (Tcneral  Assembly  met  at  Edini)urgh 
 in  the  beginning  of  June  1616,  Charles,  from  the 
 Scots  army,  sent  them  a  very  humble  letter,  ex- 
 pressing his  grief  for  the  divided  state  of  his  king- 
 dom, and  his  earnest  desire  to  comply  with  the 
 requests  of  his  Parliament,  and  recommending 
 himself  and  hisdistracted  kingdom  to  their  j)rayers. 
 Hy  Messrs.  Henderson,  Blair,  Douglas,  James  (ru- 
 thry,  and  A.  Cant,  they  presented  to  him  a  most 
 Christian  and  loyal  answer,  with  other  recpiests. 
 They  enacted  tiiat  ante- nuptial  fornication  should 
 'iiQ  censured  in  the  ordinary  manner,  as  aftt  r  acts 
 of  justice  do  not  atone  for  former  faults;  that 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  24-7 
 
 every  professor  in  the  universities  present  to  the 
 Assembly  a  copy  of  his  prelections ;  that  the  in- 
 terest of  congregations  in  the  calling  and  admis- 
 sion of  ministers,  and  what  relates  to  it,  be  ma- 
 turely considered  by  Presbyteries  and  Synods, 
 and  their  proposals  for  preventing  contentions, 
 be  returned;  that  compliers  with  Montrose  ought 
 to  be  censured;  that  no  students  of  divinity  shall 
 preach  to  the  people,  till  they  be  regularly  licens- 
 ed; that  no  ships  should  launch  from  harbour,  or 
 loose  anchor  on  the  Lord's  day — nor  any  children 
 go  out  of  the  kingdom  without  testimonials  from 
 their  Presbytery,  and  without  bringing  back  such, 
 relative  to  their  conduct  when  abroad.  They  laid 
 the  Earl  of  Seaforth  under  the  higher  excommu- 
 nication.    And,  awakened  by  the  rage  of  sword 
 and  pestilence,  they  pointed  out  the  corruptions 
 of  ministers,  in  their  private  and  public  conduct, 
 and  the  proper  remedies  thereof.     They  approv- 
 ed some  overtures  respecting  the  mutual  corres- 
 pondence of  Presbyteries,  the  assistance  of  poor 
 students,  and  the  planting  of  kirks  and  schools  in 
 the  Highlands,  with  candidates  that  understand 
 their  language.      They  wrote  to  the  Parliament 
 of  England,  and  to  the  Wesminster  Assembly, 
 commending  their  past  endeavours,  and  beseech- 
 ing their  further  diligence  in   promoting  an  uni- 
 formity in  reformation  between  the  two  king- 
 doms.    They  ordered  their  solemn  thanks  to  be 
 given  to  Mr.  David  Calderwood,  for  the  trouble 
 he  had  taken   in  collecting  the  history  of  this 
 church;  appointed  him  and  his  clerk  to  be  indem- 
 nified for  their  labour,  and  the  work  to  be  pub- 
 lished as  soon  as  possible.     The   confusions  of 
 these    times    prevented    the    publication.      His 
 abridgment  of  it    was    published  about  thirty 
 
LM8  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THK 
 
 years  after,  as  a  testimony  ai^^ainst  the  then  do- 
 iuineerin<;  Ki)iseopacy.  An  attempt  uas  made 
 about  thirty  years  a^o  to  i)iiblish  the  full  history; 
 but  subscriptions  failed. 
 
 Let  us  now,  for  a  while,  turn  our  eyes  toward 
 En«;land.  Scarcely  had  the  Parliamentarians,  by 
 the  victory  of  Marston  .Moor,  perceived  themselves 
 able  to  withstand  all  the  furces  that  his  Majesty 
 could  brin^^  aj^ainst  them,  than  they  ungratefully 
 provoked  their  Scotch  deliverers  to  a  breach.  To 
 shut  them  up  to  mutiny,  desertion,  or  oppression 
 of  the  country  by  taking-  free  quarters,  they  with- 
 held their  pay,  pretending  that  the  interest  would 
 sufficiently  balance  the  delay  of  payment.  Being 
 thus  obliged  to  take  free  quarters,  these  were 
 dishonestly  over-rated.  Want  of  subsistence  oblig- 
 ed them  to  want  ministers,  which  occasioned  a 
 profane  licentiousness  in  severals.  Sometimes  the 
 English  Parliament,  for  weeks,  or  even  for  months, 
 neglected  to  answer  the  remonstrances  of  their 
 conmiissioners.  Their  expresses  were  sometimes 
 intercepted,  and  their  letters  opened,  while  the 
 House  of  Commons  screened  the  olfenders.  In 
 their  treaty  with  Charles,  at  Uxbridge,  they 
 changed  al'.nost  every  thing  in  the  propositions 
 made  to  his  Majesty,  which  marked  the  power 
 of,  or  did  honour  to  the  Scots,  and  assumed  all 
 to  themselves.  Notwithstanding  all  these  provo- 
 cations, the  Scots,  regardful  of  their  solemn  co- 
 venant with  God,  did  all  that  in  them  lay,  and 
 even  renounced  part  of  their  own  interest,  in  or- 
 der to  promote  the  peace  and  welfare  of  England. 
 
 In  INIay  IfJlO",  Charles,  after  he  had  empower- 
 ed Ormond  and  Digby  to  clap  up  a  peace  with 
 the  Irish  Papists,  which  almost  established  their 
 religion  to  tliem,  in  order  that   he  might  obtain 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  219 
 
 their  faithful  service  against  his  Protestant  sub- 
 jects in  Britain, — he  fled  from  Oxford  when  it 
 was  upon  the  point  of  being  blocked  up  by  the 
 parliament's  army  ;  and  in  company  with  two  or 
 three  more,  rode  within  a  few  miles  of  London  ; 
 then  directed  his  course  toward  the  sea ;  and  at 
 last  resolved  to  throw  himself  into  the  Scotch  ar- 
 my, which  lay  at  Newcastle  ;  and  continued  with 
 them  about  eight  months.     Commissioners  from 
 the  Committee  of  Estates  presented  to  him  some 
 propositions  for  peaoe  ;  and  these  above-mention- 
 ed, from  the  Assembly,   laboured  to  remove  his 
 prejudices  against  Presbytery  and  the  covenants. 
 At  least  pretending  that  he  believed  Episcopacy 
 to  be  of  divine  appointment,  and  that   he  had 
 bound  himself  by  his  coronation  oath  to  support 
 it,  he  and  Sir  Robert  Murray  debated  this  point 
 in  a  series   of  letters  w  ith  Mr.   A.  Henderson  ; 
 in  which  he  pretended,  that  the  English,  in  their 
 reformation,  had  preciselij  followed  the  apostolic 
 appointment,  and  the  universal  pattern  of  the  pri- 
 mitive church  ;  and  that  where  the  succession  of 
 episcopal  priesthood  ceaseth,  there  is  no  valid  ad- 
 ministration of  the  sacraments  ;  that  no  reforma- 
 tion of  churches  is  lawful,  but  under  the  direction 
 of  royal  authority  ;  that  no  real  defects  could  be 
 pointed  out  in  the  reformation  established  by 
 King  Edward  and  Queen  Elizabeth ;  that  Pres- 
 byterian government  was  never  known  till  Cal- 
 vin  introduced  it  at  Geneva;    that  the  unani- 
 mous consent  of  the  Fathers  is  the  true  standard 
 of  interpreting  scripture  ;  and  that  the  clause  in 
 his  coronation  oath  respecting  religion  being  in- 
 serted in  favours  of  the  church,  the  Parliament 
 cannot  dissolve  that  obligation  without  her  con- 
 sent.     In   his   replies,  Mr.   Henderson  shewed, 
 
 2  iv 
 
2^0  A   COMI'KNIMOUS    HISTUUY   OF   THE 
 
 I'liat  many  serious  Christians  and  learned  di- 
 vines, had  all  alon^  coni[)lained  of  the  imperfec- 
 tion of  the  l*]ni;lish  icformation  ;  that,  to  the 
 ^nief  of  other  Protestant  churches,  it  had  occa- 
 sioned no  small  contention  and  schism  ;  that  all 
 subjects,  hein*;  under  the  whole  law  of  God,  and 
 hound  to  take  care  for  their  own  and  posterity's 
 eternal  salvation,  ou^ht  to  reform  themselves,  if 
 j)rinces  be  net^bi^ent  or  attached  to  prevalent  cor- 
 ruptions ;  that  in  the  ajjostoHcal  a^e,  there  was 
 no  dilfereTice  between  bishops  and  presbyters ; 
 that  not  the  j)ractice  of  the  church  some  a<^es 
 alter  Cliri^t,  or  the  consent  of  fathers,  but  the 
 word  of  God,  is  our  rule  in  religion  ;  that  it  is 
 now  impossible  to  know  the  universal  practice  of 
 the  primitive  churcli,  or  the  unanimous  consent 
 of  the  Fathers  ;  that,  according  to  these  Fathers, 
 the  scriptures  must  be  interj)reted  by  themselves, 
 and  our  faith  not  stand  in  the  wisdom  of  men, 
 but  in  the  power  of  God  ; — that  when  the  formal 
 reason  of  an  oath  is  removed,  the  obligation  of  it 
 ceaseth  ;  and  when  the  Parliament  repeal  laws, 
 the  coronation  oath  doth  not  bind  to  oppose  their 
 deed  ;  that  his  royal  and  learned  father,  never  ad- 
 mitted episcopacy  to  be  ajipointed  by  Christ  or 
 his  apostles,  and  all  the  reforming  divines,  even 
 of  I'^ngland,  had  reckoned  it  merely  an  human  ap- 
 pointment ;  that  the  Westminster  Assembly  had 
 jjroved  Presbyterian  government  founded  on  the 
 scripture  ;  that  magistrates'  supremacy  over  the 
 church  in  spiritual  affairs  cannot  be  justified 
 from  the  word  of  (iod  or  right  reason.  The  felt 
 approaches  of  death,  probably  hastened  by  grief, 
 that  Charles,  by  his  obstinate  refusal  to  comply 
 with  his  Parliament,  was  like  to  ruin  himself  and 
 his  kingdoms,   obliged  Mv.    Henderson  to   break 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  251 
 
 off  his  answer  to  Charles's  fourth  letter,  and  retire 
 to  his  country.  The  Episcopalians  gave  out,  that 
 he  died  of  remorse,  that  he  had  occasioned  so 
 much  trouble  to  so  pious  a  king,  and  published  a 
 forged  recantation,  as  if  made  by  him  on  his  death- 
 bed. But  the  General  Assembly  declared  it  false 
 and  scandalous. 
 
 Old  General  Lesly,  at  the  head  of  an  hundred 
 of  his  officers,  on  their  knees,  in  an  humble  sup- 
 plication, earnestly  besought  Charles  to  satisfy 
 his  English  Parliament,  and  favour  the  solemn 
 League  and  Covenant.  Lord  Loudon  represented 
 to  him  his  absolute  necessity  of  com])lying  with 
 their  demands,  if  he  inclined  to  keep  the  throne 
 for  himself,  or  his  family.  Meanwhile,  the  Inde- 
 pendents and  their  friends,  afraid  of  Charles's  com- 
 pliance with  the  Parliament's  demands,  and  par- 
 ticularly with  Presbytery  by  the  Scots  influence, 
 got  a  vote  carried  in  the  Parliament,  that  there 
 was  no  further  need  of  their  army  in  England. 
 Hereupon  their  pay  was  withheld,  their  quarters 
 were  straitened  by  the  Parliament's  forces ;  and 
 they  had  almost  nothing  but  the  four  northern 
 counties  to  support  them.  Want  of  pay  obliged 
 them  to  take  free  quarters,  which,  by  the  Secta- 
 rians' means,  occasioned  loud  cries  of  oppression. 
 They  also  published  scurrilous  defamations  of 
 them,  as  covenant-breakers,  apostates,  and  com- 
 pilers with  malignants.  These  and  the  like 
 abuses  made  the  Scotch  army  heartily  tired  of 
 England,  and  anxious  to  return  home,  as  soon  as 
 they  could  secure  the  payment  of  the  arrears  due 
 to  them.  They  produced  proper  claims  for  al- 
 most a  million  Sterling:  but,  when  the  English 
 offered  them  ^200,000  in  hand,  and  security  for 
 .€200,000  more,  they,  to  testify  their  disinterest- 
 
2^2  A  COMPENDIOUS    HISTORY  OF  THP. 
 
 cclncss  and  love  of  peace,  accepted  it,  September 
 2,  164-6,  in  place  of  full  payment. 
 
 About  sixteen  days  after  this  pecuniary  agree- 
 ment was  fully  settled,  Charles,  in  despite  of  all 
 that  had  or  could  be  said  to  persuade  him,  refus- 
 ed to  comply  with  the  Knglish  Parliament's  pro- 
 positions for  peace.  Hereupon  that  Parliament 
 voted,  that  his  person  should  be  disposed  of  as 
 they  thought  fit.  Against  this  deed  the  Scotch 
 commissioners  earnestly  remonstrated,  and  insist- 
 ed for  a  joint  consultation  with  respect  to  the  dis- 
 posal of  his  majesty's  person.  Loudon  repre- 
 sented to  the  English  commissioners,  That,  by 
 the  solemn  league,  both  kingdoms  were  united  to 
 God,  and  to  their  king,  and  to  one  another  ;  and 
 that  after  the  Scots  had  done  so  much  to  promote 
 the  welfare  of  England,  it  was  neither  consistent 
 with  honour,  conscience,  or  equity,  to  dispose  of 
 his  majesty's  person,  without  consent  of  both 
 kingdoms  ;  and  he,  as  in  the  above-mentioned 
 remonstrance,  insisted  that  he  might  be  allowed 
 to  reside  in  or  near  London,  that  so  an  agreement 
 between  him  and  his  Parliament  might  be  speed- 
 ily effected  ; — or  at  least  that  commissioners 
 might  be  again  sent  to  him  to  explain  their  pro- 
 positions, and  endeavour  to  remove  his  scruples. 
 Argyle,  in  his  address  to  both  houses  of  Parlia- 
 ment, begged  them  to  promote  the  work  of  refor- 
 mation according  to  the  solemn  league,  and  nei- 
 ther to  persecute  true  pieiy,  nor  to  allow  lawless 
 liberty  ;  and  that  they  would  endeavour  to  main- 
 tain the  peace  of  the  two  kingdoms,  and  study- 
 to  reform,  not  ruin  his  majesty,  and  to  regulate, 
 but  not  destroy  monarchy. 
 
 \\'hilc   the  Scots  were   labouring  to   persuade 
 Ciiarles  to  agree  with   his    English    Parliament, 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  253 
 
 he,  finding  their  army  heartily  attached  to  their 
 solemn  league,  soon  wearied  of  them,  and  repeat- 
 edly applied  to  his  English  Parliament  for  their 
 allowance  of  his  safe  dwelling  in  London,  or  near 
 to  it.  They  appointed  him  Holmby,  in  the  coun* 
 ty  of  Northampton,  for  his  residence,  and  agreed, 
 That  as  soon  as  he  should  come  thither,  and  the 
 Scots  retire  from  England,  they  would  concur 
 with  them  in  endeavouring  to  obtain  his  consent 
 to  their  propositions.  These  resolutions  being 
 transmitted  to  Charles,  and  to  Scotland,  the  Par- 
 liament there  earnestly  besought  him  to  comply 
 with  theproposals,  shewed  him  the  reasons  of  so  do- 
 ing, and  the  danger  of  his  refusing,  as  they  could 
 not,  in  that  case,  assist  him  in  recovering  his  king- 
 dom ;  and  that  both  kingdoms  would  be  obliged  to 
 take  some  joint  course  for  disposing  of  his  person, 
 till  he  should  give  satisfaction  to  his  Parliaments. 
 While  he  was  with  the  Scotch  army,  he  earnest- 
 ly solicited  them  to  join  with  the  Episcopalians, 
 that  they  might  be  enabled  to  destroy  their  sec- 
 tarian enemies.  But,  his  proposals  being  laid  be- 
 fore the  Assembly  in  June,  they  declared  as 
 warmly  against  joining  with  the  one  as  with  the 
 other.  And  the  Commission  in  December,  re- 
 monstrated against  his  coming  to  Scotland,  as  he 
 would  probably  act  up  to  his  former  principles, 
 and  endeavour  to  draw  them  from  their  sokiiDi 
 league;  and  as  it  would  confirm  the  English  in 
 their  suspicions  of  underhand  dealing  with  him, 
 before  he  came  to  their  army;  and  as  it  would 
 involve  them  in  breach  of  covenant,  and  a  bloody 
 war  with  England. 
 
 When  the  Scotch  Parliament  met  in  January 
 1647,  they,  considering  that  notwithsanding  his 
 promise  to  their  army  when  he  came  to  it,  and 
 
2.3  l<  A   COMPKNniOUS    HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 the  many  addresses  presented  to  him  from  this 
 kingdom,  he*  continued  stifly  to  refuse  the  propo- 
 sitions which  the  Ilni^lish  Parliament  had  made 
 to  him  ;  and  that  he  liad  requested  said  Parlia- 
 ment i'nv  allowance  to  reside  in  or  near  London, 
 and  they  had  allowed  him  to  reside  at  Ilolmby 
 house,  they  consented  that  he  repair  to  either  of 
 these  |)laces,  and  there  remain  till  lie  should  give 
 satisfaction  to  hotli  kingdoms  with  respect  to 
 their  propositions  of  peace — providing  that  no 
 injury  he  done  to  his  person,  or  change  of  govern- 
 ment, from  that  of  the  three  preceding  years,  be 
 attempted,  and  that  his  posterity  be  no  wise  pre- 
 judiced with  respect  to  their  succession  to  the 
 throne.  Along  with  this  declaration  transmitted 
 to  the  English  Parliament,  they  insisted,  that 
 when  his  Majesty  shall  come  to  Holmliy  House, 
 committees  from  both  Lords  and  Commons  shall 
 l)e  apj)ointed  to  deal  with  him  to  procure  his  con- 
 sent to  the  propositions  for  peace;  and  that  Com- 
 missioners from  Scotland  should  have  free  access 
 to  deal  with  him  for  the  same  purpose; — and  that 
 no  pacification  should  be  made  without  the  con- 
 sent of  both  kingdoms.  The  other  acts  of  this 
 J*arliament  were — for  suppressing  the  remains  of 
 3Iontrose\s  faction  ;  for  reinstating  of  some  who 
 Iiad  been  forfeited  for  their  junction  with  him  ; 
 for  distributing  L.  .0000  Sterling  among  the  chil- 
 dren and  widows  of  such  as  had  been  slain  in  the 
 late  war;  for  prosecuting  excommunicated  per- 
 sons as  rebels,  after  forty  days  contumacy  ;  for 
 suppression  of  all  observance  of  Christmas  and 
 other  superstitious  seasons,  by  the  removal  of  col- 
 liers, sailers,  or  the  like;  for  reparation  of  dama- 
 l^es  suft'cred  for  conscientious  adherence  to  the 
 religion  and  liberties  of  the  kingdom;  for  declar- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  255 
 
 ing"  null  and  void  all  engaerements  to  Montrose, 
 McDonald,  or  their  associates ;  for  the  lords  of 
 privy  council's  taking  the  children  or  pupils  of 
 Papists  from  them,  and  committing  them  to  such 
 as  will  train  them  up  in  the  Protestant  religion, 
 and  in  virtuous  behaviour;  and  for  disbanding  all 
 their  troops  but  7,200. 
 
 Horrible  have  been  the  outcries  of  Jacobites 
 and  their  friends  against  the  Scotch  army  and 
 Parliament,  as  if  they  had  sold  Charles,  their 
 King,  for  L.  200,000  Sterling ;  for  it  seems  they 
 never  got  more  of  the  milion  that  was  owing, 
 and  L.400,000  that  was  promised  them.  But  it 
 ought  to  be  considered,  that  Charles  did  not  come 
 to  the  Scotch  army  but  unwillingly,  as  his  last 
 shift,  and  that  without  either  warning  or  terms; 
 and  that  all  the  money  they  got,  and  much  more, 
 was  due  to  them  for  what  laborious  and  useful  ser- 
 vice they  had  performed  for  the  English,  ere 
 Charles  came  near  them,  and  was  granted  to 
 them  entirely  upon  that  footing,  without  the  least 
 mention  of  the  King  in  the  agreement ;  that  the 
 agreement  relative  to  this  money  was  concluded 
 before  there  was  any  treaty  respecting  his  Majes- 
 ty's person,  whether  he  should  go  to  Scotland  or 
 remain  in  England,  and  five  months  before  he 
 went  from  Newcastle  to  Holmby;  that  the  affair 
 of  the  money  was  finally  settled  in  September  2, 
 and  the  warm  debates  iDCtween  the  Scotch  Com- 
 missioners and  English  Parliament  concerning 
 the  disposal  of  Charles's  person,  did  not  take  place 
 before  October  following;  that,  during  his  stay 
 in  the  Scotch  army,  he  had  repeatedly  petitioned 
 the  English  Parliament  for  allowance  to  come  to 
 London,  or  some  place  near  to  it,  which  is  much 
 the  same  with  what  the  Scots  yielded  to ;  that 
 
2.^fj  A   COMPKNDfOUS    HISTORY  OF   TIIK 
 
 lUirinc^  the  montlis  of  November,  Deccm!)er,  and 
 January,  the  Parliament  had  laboured  to  per- 
 suade him  to  a  compliance  with  the  propositions 
 of  peace  ;  and  a  few  days  before  he  removed  to 
 riolmby  house,  the  Scots  had  offered  to  sacrifice 
 their  lives  and  fortunes  in  the  re-establishment 
 of  him  on  his  throne,  if  he  would  but  do  so;  and 
 that  when  the  Scotch  army  returned  iiome,  there 
 was  no  appearance  of  things  taking-  the  turn 
 which  they  aflorwards  did  ;  that  the  Scots  en- 
 trusted his  Majesty's  person  to  the  Parliament  of 
 England,  who  were,  by  duty,  by  oath,  and  by 
 interest,  as  deeply  bound  to  protect  him  as  them- 
 selves, and  would  have  done  it,  had  not  Charles's 
 trusting  of  himself  to  the  Sectarian  army  occa- 
 sioned their  tall,  and  so  hastened  his  own  ruin. 
 
 No  sooner  had  the  Scots  heard  that  the  Kng- 
 lish  armv,  now  under  Sectarian  management, 
 had  his  Majesty  in  their  power,  than  they  added 
 the  Earls  of  Loudon  and  Lanark  to  their  former 
 Commissioners,  in  order  to  ])ersuade  him  to  a  full 
 compliance  with  the  [)ropositions  of  peace.  In- 
 stead hereof,  Charles,  finding  his  expectations 
 from  the  English  army  disappointed,  especially 
 by  means  of  Lanark,  attempted  to  engage  the 
 Scots  Commissioners  to  commence  a  war  against 
 the  English,  in  order  to  his  restoration.  Hopes 
 of  annuities,  by  which  he  might  relieve  his  deep- 
 ly indebted  estate,  drew  Loudon  himself  into  the 
 snare.  Returning  home  about  the  beginning  of 
 I'obruary  1018,  these  Commissioners,  chiefly  Lou- 
 don and  Lauderdale,  represented  to  their  bre- 
 thren, that  his  IMajesty  had  been  very  ill  used 
 by  the  English  Parliament,  and  could  put  no  trust 
 in  tlu'  arn^y;  that,  contrary  to  their  covenant,  the 
 interest  of  religion,  and   i)eace  of  the  kingdom, 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  257 
 
 that  Parliament  had  extended  their  demands  up- 
 on him,  and  had  absolutely  refused  to  allow  the 
 Scots  to  concur  with  them  in  settling  matters 
 with  him  as  their  common  Sovereign  ;  that,  after 
 dissenting  from  their  procedure,  they  had  dealt 
 with  Charles  to  confirm  the  solemn  league^  establish 
 Presbyterian  government^  and  disallow  the  heresies 
 and  sects  presently  swarming  in  England ;  that 
 he  is  willing  that  the  covenant  be  confirmed  by  act 
 of  Parliament,  providing  that  none  be  constrain- 
 ed to  take  it ;  that  he  is  willing  that  Presbyteri- 
 an government  be  established  for  three  years, 
 providing  that  he  and  his  family  be  allowed  the 
 use  of  the  liturgy  ;  that  he  is  willing  to  concur  in 
 an  act  for  the  suppression  of  sectaries  and  blas- 
 phemers, and  to  have  it  secured  by  an  act  of 
 Parliament ;  that  neither  he  nor  his  heirs  shall 
 quarrel  any  for  their  obedience  to  the  acts  of  the 
 last  triennial  Parliament  of  Scotland,  or  its  com- 
 mittees. Meanwhile,  the  English  Parliament 
 sent  down  some  commissioners  to  cultivate  har- 
 mony with  the  Scotch  Parliament,  and  to  notify 
 their  intentions  to  pay  speedily,  at  least  part  of 
 the  L.  200,000  which  they  owed  to  their  armies, 
 which  had  served  them  in  England  and  Ireland. 
 During  these  litigations  in  England,  the  Gene- 
 ral Assembly  met  at  Edinburgh  in  August  1647, 
 had  established  some  directions  for  secret  and  fa- 
 mily worship;  had  prohibited  persons'  withdraw- 
 ment  from  public  worship  in  their  own  congrega- 
 tions ; — after  a  double  reading  of  the  Westmin- 
 ster Confession  offaith^  and  calling  of  all  such  as 
 doubted  of  any  thing  in  it,  to  j)ro[)ose  their  ob- 
 jections to  a  committee  appointed  to  answer  them, 
 had  approved  it,  but  explaining'  part  of  chap.  xxxi. 
 to  mean  only,  that,  in  extraordinary  cases,  mini- 
 
 2  1. 
 
258  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 sters  and  other  fit  persons,  by  virtue  of  tlicir  of- 
 fice, or  by  a  7nen'  call  of  the  ^^a^i^trates,  picking 
 out  parti(*ular  pumiiIkts,  as  in  the  Westminster 
 Assenihlv,  may  hohl  Synods  without  anjj  drlcga- 
 Hon  I'rotn  Ihnr  churches;  had  prohibited  the  spread 
 of  erroneous  books,  which  the  Knirlish  sectaries 
 were  inclined  to  pour  into  the  country  ;  liad  ex- 
 tracted and  approved  in  eight  propositions  the 
 principal  heads  of  Gilespy's  Hundred  and  eleven 
 projHhsitionSy  which  they  had  remitted  to  the  con- 
 sideration of  the  most  famous  foreign  divines,  as 
 well  as  recommended  to  the  examination  of  their 
 own  ministers  and  doctors  of  universities,  in  or- 
 der that  they  may  send  up  their  judgment  of 
 them  to  the  next  Assembly  ;  and  had  written  a 
 letter  to  their  countrymen  abroad,  informing 
 them  of  (jod's  mercy's  to  them,  and  of  their  pre- 
 sent difficulties,  and  begging  their  sympathy  and 
 prayers;  had  formed  some  overtures  for  excite- 
 ment of  teachers  in  universities,  and  for  baptiz- 
 ing children  of  beggars,  ^c.  ;  and  had  appointed 
 some  to  review  the  metre  version  of  the  Psalms, 
 transmitted  tothem  by  the  Westminster  Assembly. 
 Next  year,  their  Commission  had  an  uncom- 
 mon struggle  with  the  state.  In  the  beginning 
 of  March  161^8,  the  l\irliament  met,  and  began 
 to  resolve  on  a  war  with  the  J^^nglish  army,  in  or- 
 der to  rescue  his  Majesty  out  of  their  hands,  and 
 restore  him  to  his  throne,  the  Ecclesiastical  (Com- 
 mission conceiving,  that  all  his  concessions  which 
 LoTidon  had  mentioned,  were  neitiier  satisfacto- 
 ry, nor  much  to  be  trusted,  especially  as  most  of 
 the  ufhc'crs  intended  for  comnuuui  in  the  project- 
 ed engagement,  were  too  evidently  enemies  to  a 
 covenanted  reformation — presented  to  ihe  Par- 
 liaiucut  d  remunslruncc  against  that  undertaking. 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  259 
 
 as  dans^erous  to  both  church   and  state.     Nor 
 could  the  Parliament  hinder  their  faithful  publi- 
 cation of  it,  and  reading  of  it  in  all  the  churches  of 
 Edinburgh.    Not  long  after,  the  Commission  be- 
 ing informed  that,  contrary  to  the  large  treaty 
 with  the  English  in  1643,  it  had  been  carried  in 
 Parliament,  to  surprise   and  take  Berwick  and 
 Carlisle,  and  place  garisons  in  them,  and  that  Ar- 
 gyle,  and  fifty-six  other  members,  had  protested 
 against  it,   they  besought  the  Parliament,  that 
 nothing  might  be  done  before  the  lawfulness  of 
 the  war  and  principal  state  of  the  question  be 
 agreed  upon  ;  that  the  breaches  of  the  covenant 
 and  peace  of  the  kingdoms  by   the  Sectarians 
 should  be  made  evident,  and   reparations  unsuc- 
 cessfully sought,  before  any  war  be  commenced; 
 that  if  war  should  be  found  necessary,   it  might 
 be  so  stated,  as  to  offend  none  of  the  English  that 
 stedfastly  adhere  to  the  covenant;  and  carried  on 
 without  any  concurrence  with  Papists,  Prelatists, 
 or  malignants ;   that   his   Majesty's  concessions 
 should  be  declared  unsatisfactory,  and  security 
 obtained  from  him,  That  he,  for  himself,  heirs, 
 and  successors,  shall  agree  to  the  acts  ratifying 
 the  solemn  league,  and  establishing  Presbyterian 
 government,  the  Directory  for  worship,  andConfession 
 of  Faith  in  all  his  dominions,  and  never  make  any 
 opposition  to  them  ;   and  that  none  but  such  as 
 had  been  faithful  to  the  covenanted  cause  should 
 be  entrusted  with  the  management  of  public  af- 
 fairs ;   and  that  there  might   be  no  engagement 
 for  war  in  favours  of  his  Majesty,   in  which  the 
 church  should  not  have  the  same  interest  as  in 
 the  solemn  leamie 
 
 After  some  wrangling,  the  Parliament,  instead 
 of  coming  to  any  agreement  with  the  Commis- 
 
HGO  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTOHY  OF  THE 
 
 sion,  reflected  lii^lily  upon  them  for  meddling 
 witli  civil  allairs,  thouj^^li  it  is  plain  these  in  hand 
 deeply  aflec  ted  their  solemn  covenant  with  (iod, 
 and  the  e*tal)lishment  of  religion  in  tlie  three 
 kin<;doms,  and  tended  to  plunge  multitudes  into 
 eternity  in  an  act  of  sinning.  The  principal  Sy- 
 nods in  the  nation,  and  some  Preshyteries  in 
 others,  solemnly  thanked  the  Commission  for 
 their  faithfulness,  who,  being  hereby  encou- 
 raged, boldly  insisted  that  the  Parliament  should 
 clear  the  lawfulness  of  the  war  before  they  pro- 
 ceeded any  further.  For  this  purpose,  the  Par- 
 liament published  a  large,  but  very  uncandid,  de- 
 claratioiiy  in  which  they  accused  the  English  of 
 several  breaches  of  their  former  trcati/  and  solemn 
 league,  and  declared  their  intentions  to  require 
 the  English  Parliament  to  take  effectual  methods 
 for  making  all  their  subjects  swear  the  solemn 
 league^  and  for  establishing  i\i\\y  J^reshj/ierian  go- 
 vernment, the  Directory  for  war  ship,  and  Confes- 
 sion if  Faiilu  and  causing  the  same  to  be  every 
 where  received;  and  for  sup|)ressing  .^oc'////(/;z^7;/, 
 Arminianism,  Arianism,  Anal >apt Ism ,  Antinomi- 
 anism,  Familisnu  Brownism,  Independencxj,  and 
 other  heresies  and  schisms,  and  for  suppress- 
 ing Popery,  Prelacy,  and  the  service  book ;  and 
 that  his  Majesty  be  allowed  safely  to  reside  in  or 
 near  London,  for  the  pur|)ose  of  his  Parliament's 
 treating  with  him,  in  order  to  the  establishment 
 of  religion  and  peace;  and  that  all  the  members 
 of  Parliament  may  attend  it,  and  a|)plications  be 
 made  to  his  iMajesty  without  any  hindrance;  that 
 the  Sectarian  army  under  (General  Fairfax  be 
 disbanded,  and  none  but  such  as  take  the  cove- 
 nant, (jr  are  well  alFected  to  religion,  l)e  hereaf- 
 ter employed,  either  in  the  army  or  to  command 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  261 
 
 They  further  declared.  That  they 
 did  not  intend  to  make  war  upon  any  of  the  En^^- 
 lish  that  adhered  to  their  covenant,  but  to  main- 
 tain their  liberty ;  that  they  would  enter  into  no 
 association  with  Papists,  Prelatists,  or  others 
 who  refused  to  take  the  covenant ;  nor  allow 
 any  but  such  as  were  faithful  to  it  to  have  any 
 trust,  or  command  in  this  war;  that  they  would 
 edeavour  to  rescue  his  JMajesty  from  the  Secta- 
 rians, that  he  might  freely  concur  with  his  peo- 
 l)le  in  promoting  the  ends  of  the  solemn  league ; 
 that  though  they  would  immediately  put  the 
 kingdom  into  a  posture  of  defence,  they  would 
 not  begin  a  war,  till  the  lawfulness  of  it  should 
 be  fully  cleared,  and  reparation  of  injuries  un- 
 successfully sought  in  a  peaceable  manner ;  and 
 that,  in  their  whole  conduct,  they  would  carefully 
 prosecute  the  ends  of  the  solemn  league  and  cove- 
 nant with  England. 
 
 Not  satisfied  with  this  declaration,  the  Com- 
 mission, April  28,  remonstrated,  That  the  breach 
 of  covenant  was  not  chargeable  upon  all  the  Eng- 
 lish, but  merely  upon  the  Sectarians,  as  it  was  no 
 less  upon  the  malignants  in  Scotland ;  that  such 
 as  encouraged  his  Majesty  to  decline  giving  satis- 
 faction, relative  to  his  securing  of  religion,  hin- 
 dered his  deliverance;  that  they  could  not  prove 
 upon  the  English  Parliament  any  such  breaches 
 of  treaty  as  could  be  sufficient  grounds  of  a  war 
 with  them;  that  it  would  be  inconsistent  to  desire 
 the  English  Parliament  to  hold  all  the  refusers 
 of  the  solemn  league  as  enemies  to  religion  and 
 ♦heir  country,  while  no  such  penalty  had  ever 
 been  executed  against  the  shifters  of  it  in  Scot- 
 land;  that  they  ought  not  to  insist  for  his  iMa- 
 jesty's  being  allowed  to        *  '"  in  or  near  Lon- 
 
2C2  A  coMi^r.NDioirs  iiiSTonv  of  the 
 
 don,  without  insisting  for  his  givin|^  satisfaction 
 to  his  Parliament,  concerning  the  security  of  their 
 religion  and  peace  of  the  kingdom  ;  that  there 
 was  as  much  need  for  preventing  the  rise  of  a  Po- 
 ])ish  or  Prehitical  party  in  the  army,  as  for  dis- 
 handing  ihe  Sectarians;  and  that  the  proposed 
 engagement  in  war  with  the  Englisli,  |)lainly 
 tended  to  j)revent  the  dishanding  of  the  Sectarian 
 army. — Xolwithstanding  this  remonstrance,  the 
 Scotch  Parhainent  transmitted  their  demands  to 
 the  I'Jiglish  Parliament,  and  published  their  above 
 mentioned  dvclaration.  The  Commission,  heart- 
 ily grieved  herewith,  emitted  a  declaration,  hear- 
 ing, 'J'hat  they  were  ready  to  agree  to  the  na- 
 tion's engaging  in  a  war  w  ith  the  English,  if  they 
 were  satisfied  concerning  the  sufhciency  of  the 
 grounds,  and  the  lawtuiness  of  the  means  for  car- 
 rying it  on.  But  as  things  stood,  they  reckoned 
 the  engagement  dangerous  to  the  reformed  reli- 
 gion, prejudicial  to  the  true  interests  and  liberty 
 of  this  church,  favourable  to  the  Popish,  Prelatic, 
 and  malignant  party,  inconsistent  with  the  union 
 of  the  kingdoms,  and  the  satisfaction  of  the  Pres- 
 byterians in  England,  and  therefore  contrary  to  the 
 word  of  (Tod  and  our  solemn  covenants;  and  that 
 the  managers  of  it  pretended  zeal  against  the 
 sectarians,  merely  for  a  cloak  to  the  favour  which 
 they  intended  for  nialignants;  and  had  even  late- 
 Jy  pled,  that  Scotland  was  in  no  danger  from  the 
 sectaries.  Highly  offended  with  the  faithful  op- 
 position of  the  Commission,  the  Parliament  sent 
 letters  to  the  several  Presbyteries,  complaining  of 
 it ; — in  answer  to  which  the  Commission  publish- 
 ed a  rindicalion  of  themselves. 
 
 Several  synods,  presbyti  i  ies,  and  shires,  again 
 petitioned  the  Parliament,  that  religion  might  be 
 secured,  and  the  union  of  the  kingdoms  preserv- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  263 
 
 ed,  and  no  war  commenced  without  very  weii^bty 
 grounds,  maturely  considered.  The  Parliament, 
 after  they  had  framed  an  answer  to  these,  laid  it 
 aside,  and  pretended  to  ask  the  advice  of  the 
 Commission  concerning  the  proper  method  of  se- 
 curing* religion.  After  testifying  their  regard  to 
 the  Parliament,  and  to  his  Majesty's  liberty  and 
 honour,  they  advised  that  these  petitions  should 
 be  granted ;  that  the  surprising  of  Berwick  and 
 Carlisle  be  disclaimed,  and  no  longer  continued ; 
 that  all  peaceable  methods  of  treating  with  Eng- 
 land, and  supplication  to  his  Majesty  be  further 
 tried,  in  order  to  compose  differences ;  that  his 
 concessions  mentioned  by  Loudon  be  declared  un- 
 satisfactory ;  that  they  declare  against  any  en- 
 gagement for  restoring  him  to  his  house  with 
 freedom  and  safety,  which  is  almost  equivalent  to 
 his  having  the  exercise  of  his  royal  power,  before 
 he  gave  it  under  his  hand  and  seal,  That  he  shall, 
 for  himself  and  his  successors,  agree  to  the  acts 
 of  Parliament  enjoining  ihesoleinii  league  and  cove- 
 nant y  and  fully  establishing  Pr^eshyterian  govern- 
 ment, the  directory  for  ivorship,  and  confession  of 
 faith,  in  all  his  dominions,  and  never  make  oppo- 
 sition to,  or  endeavour  a  change  of  any  of  them  ; 
 that  they  should  make  it  evident,  that  they  have 
 no  intention  to  enable  his  Majesty  to  bring  the 
 proceedings  of  both  nations,  relative  to  the  so- 
 lemn league,  into  question,  or  to  abridge  the 
 power  of  his  Parliaments  ;  that  they  should  take 
 proper  methods  to  suppress  such  Papists,  Pre- 
 latists,  or  malignants,  as  had,  or  might  take 
 arms  to  plunder  and  murder  their  fellow  sub- 
 jects :  that  nothing  be  done  which  may  infringe 
 the  union  of  the  two  kingdoms,  or  disoblige  the 
 Presbyterian  party  in  England  ;  that  all  putting 
 
2C)h  A   COMPKXIJIOUS   HISTORY  OF  TIIK 
 
 of  such  as  had  been  indifTcTent  neutrals,  or  oppos- 
 ers  of  a  covenanted  reformation,  into  places  of 
 power  and  trust,  should  he  (juickly  remedied  ; 
 that  there  should  he  no  en;^agement  for  the  war 
 without  a  solemn  oath,  in  which  the  church 
 should  have  the  same  direction  as  in  the  solemn 
 lL'a!j;iif:  that  such  as  have  heen  oppressed  for  not 
 contrihutini^  to  the  levies  for  the  army  be  refund- 
 ed, and  no  such  thin^'-  permitted  for  the  future; 
 that  the  profaneness  and  insolence  of  soldiers  be 
 severely  j)unished;  that  nothing  be  enacted  detri- 
 mental to  the  liberty  of  the  church,  and  no  arbi- 
 trary power  entrusted  to  their  officers  or  ai^ents; 
 or  an  oath  imposed  tending-  to  ensnare  the  con- 
 sciences of  the  subjects. 
 
 Regardless  of  these  advices,  the  Parliament  ap- 
 pointed an  army  to  be  immediately  raised  under 
 the  command  of  Duke  Hamilton,  and  the  Earl  of 
 Callender  as  his  lieutenant;  and  laid  an  enormous 
 tax  upon  the  nation,  for  defraying  the  expenses 
 of  the  war.  Argyle,  Sutherland,  Cajsilis,  Eglin- 
 ton,  Loudon,  and  Lothian,  with  many  other 
 Lords,  Barons,  and  Burgesses,  protested  against 
 their  cn^^agcmcjtt.  Colonels  Ker,  Strachan,  Hal- 
 ket,  and  other  officers,  refused  to  serve  in  it;  and 
 had  their  places  filled  with  scandalous  malig- 
 nants.  Such  as  refused  to  pay  the  new  tax,  were 
 terribly  oppressed  and  spoiled  by  soldiers  quar- 
 tered upon  them.  The  Parliament  next  pre[)ar- 
 ed  a  dccUtrailoji  to  be  sent  into  England,  recount- 
 ing all  that  they  thought  criminal  in  the  conduct 
 of  the  sectaries,  ami  pretending  that,  as  they  had 
 got  no  satisfaction  to  their  former  demands,  they 
 had  been  necessarily  obliged  to  this  engagement 
 ill  war;  that  they  intended  to  preserve  the  re- 
 formation  of  religion   as   established    by  law  in 
 
 I 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  265 
 
 Scotland,  and  to  rescue  his  Majesty  from  his 
 base  imprisonment,  that  he  may  with  safety  and 
 honour  come  to  one  of  his  houses  in,  or  near 
 London,  where  he  may  treat  with  his  Parliament, 
 and  to  restore  freedom  to  his  English  Parliament, 
 that  they,  together  with  the  Scotch,  might  con- 
 clude the  treaty  with  their  Sovereign,  answerably 
 to  the  petitions  presented  to  him  by  the  city  of 
 London,  at  Oxford  and  Newcastle ;  and  to  pro- 
 cure the  disbanding  of  the  army  under  General 
 Fairfax — and  that  none  but  covenanters,  and  well 
 affected  to  religion  and  Presbyterian  church  go- 
 vernment, miglit  hereafter  be  employed  in  troops 
 or  garrisons.  Notwithstanding  all  these  preten- 
 ces, many  notorious  malignants  were  principal 
 agents  in  carrying  on  this  engagement.  Hence 
 the  more  serious  covenanters  generally  disliked, 
 and,  as  they  had  opportunity,  opposed  it. 
 
 The  General  Assembly,  which  met  July  12, 
 1618,  approved  and  ratified  the  proceedings  of 
 the  late  commission.  The  committee  of  Estates, 
 which  the  late  Parliament  had  entrusted  with 
 the  execution  of  their  designs,  demanded,  what 
 they  thought  necessary  for  securing  of  religion  ? 
 The  Assembly  replied,  that  they  knew  no  possi- 
 bility of  securing  religion,  while  this  unlawful 
 engagement  was  carried  on,  since  none  of  the 
 just  desires  of  the  late  commission  had  been  grant- 
 ed ;  that  it  was  plainly  calculated  to  break  the 
 union  of  the  two  kingdoms  ;  that  all  proper 
 means  to  prevent  a  war  have  been  neglected,  and 
 malignants  and  incendiaries  have  been  joined 
 with  ;  that  it  hath  been  carried  on  in  the  way  of 
 polluting  men's  consciences  by  unlawful  bands 
 and  oaths,  and  of  oppressing  sucli  in  their  j)er- 
 sons  and  estates  as  had  been  most  zealous  for  the 
 
 2  M 
 
266  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 covenanted  interest, — and  of  remarkable  en- 
 croachnrients  on  the  liberty  of  Christ's  church. 
 The  coiniiiittce  therefore  required  them,  to  de- 
 monstrate from  the  word  of  (4od  the  unlawful- 
 ness of  their  engagement,  and  what  interest  the 
 church  had  in  the  undertakini^  of  wars;  in  an- 
 swer to  which  the  Assend)ly  emitted  a  lar<;e  dc- 
 c/aratinny  plainly  illustrating  both  these  points 
 from  the  scripture.  And,  as  the  Parliament  had 
 required  all  the  subjects,  under  pain  of  beiui;'  held 
 enemies  to  their  kin<^  and  country,  solemnly,  by 
 their  oath  and  subscrij)tion,  to  acknowledge  all 
 their  acts  relative  to  the  enga<i^ement  to  be  law- 
 ful, and  to  engage  to  prosecute  the  same  as  a 
 most  proper  mean  of  remedying  former  evils,  and 
 of  preserving  his  Majesty's  authority,  along  with 
 the  religion,  laws,  and  liberties  of  the  kingdom, 
 the  Assembly  declared,  That  a  sinful  oath,  tend- 
 ing to  draw  the  subjects  from  their  former  prin- 
 ciples and  covenant  with  God,  and  importing  a 
 solemn  ap])robation  of  acts,  which  they  had  not 
 yet  seen, — of  acts  made  in  opposition  to  the 
 known  mind  of  the  church,  and  sinful  in  several 
 respects  ;  and  they  warned  all  concerned  to  for- 
 bear swearing  of  it,  under  pain  of  censure ;  and 
 they  earnestly  besought  the  committee  of  Estates, 
 to  consider  \\  hat  guilt  they  would  incur  by  im- 
 posing such  a  sinful  bond.  They  also  remonstrat- 
 ed to  his  majesty,  that  his  concessions  were  not 
 satisfactory ;  and  that  the  present  engagement 
 in  war  was  not  a  proper  mean  of  his  deliverance  ; 
 and  that  by  his  former  refusals  to  hearken  to 
 their  advice,  he  had  occasioned  the  death  of 
 many  thousands  of  his  subjects,  and  the  fearful 
 increase  of  Popery,  profaneness,  and  many  other 
 abominations  in  his  kingdom  ;  and  they  besought 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  267 
 
 him  deeply  to  repent  of  his  wickedness,  secret 
 and   open,  as  a  true  mean  of  restoration  to   his 
 
 throne. They  appointed  all  ministers,  under 
 
 pain  of  censure,  to  preach  against  the  above  en- 
 gagement and  bond,  as  well  as  the  Sectarian  er- 
 rors, and  increasing  profaneness.  They  appoint- 
 ed, that  none  but  elders  approved  by  the  minis- 
 ter and  session,  be  admitted  into  the  Assembly 
 as  commissioners  from  burghs  ;  that  commission- 
 ers report  their  whole  procedure  to  the  next  As- 
 sembly at  their  first  meeting ;  that  no  collections 
 for  the  poor  be  made  in  the  time  of  God's  wor- 
 ship ;  that  no  deposed  ministers  be  reponed  with- 
 out the  consent  of  the  Assembly,  or  if  malignant, 
 to  his  former  congregation  ;  that  forty  Highland 
 boys  be  educated  for  the  ministry  at  the  public 
 expence,  in  order  to  plant  the  vacant  congrega- 
 tions in  that  country  ;  that  all  students,  at  their 
 entry  to  the  college,  and  others  at  their  admis- 
 sion to  the  Lord's  table,  take  the  covenant ;  that 
 duellers  be  censured  in  much  the  same  manner 
 as  fornicators.  They  approved  the  Larger  and 
 Shorter  Catechisms  compiled  by  the  Westminster 
 Assembly,  and  prohibited  an  erroneous  cate- 
 chism then  published.  After  consideration  of  the 
 prevalent  sins  of  that  time,  they  pointed  out  pro- 
 per remedies,  civil,  domestic,  and  ecclesiastical, 
 and  approved  several  overtures  relative  to  excom- 
 municated persons,  Papists,  and  their  children. 
 They  returned  friendly  answers  to  several  letters 
 sent  them  from  the  Westminster  Assembly,  and 
 appointed  their  commissioners  in  it  to  exert 
 themselves  to  their  utmost  for  promoting  a  full 
 and  fixed  uniformity  in  religion.  And,  as  the 
 times  were  so  critical,  they  appointed  a  large 
 commission  of  100  ministers,  and  60  elders,  of 
 
ilGS  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 whom  13  ministers,  aiul  lour  ciders  were  declar- 
 ed a  quorum. 
 
 Notwithstandiiii;  all  opposition,  duke    Hamil- 
 ton, Lanark   his  brother,  and  their  Iriends,  car- 
 ried  on   the  C7igage7nc7i(,   ami  invaded   Eni^land, 
 still  pretending;  regard  to  the  covenant  and  Tres- 
 byterian   i;ovcrnment.      But   so  abandoned  were 
 many  of*  their  soldiers,  that  they  fell  upon  a  mul- 
 titude of  sincere  covenanters,  when  a>send)led  at 
 a  sacramental  occasion   at   rslachiin.   and   killed 
 and  wounded  a  number  of  them.    At  Carsphearn, 
 they  fell  u|)on  another  assembly  employed  in  sa- 
 cramental   work,    and    devoured    the    elements. 
 About  the   middle  of  Aui^ust,  their  engagement 
 issued  in  the  slauohter  and  rout  of  their  army  by 
 Cromwell   at  Preston,   and  in  imprisonment  and 
 death  to  Hamilton  and  other  commanders  of  it  ; 
 and  not   lonp^  after,   in  the  ignominious  death  of 
 Charles,  who   had  planned   and  pushed   them  to 
 it.       Sir   (George   JMonro   had    brou<::ht  his  army 
 from  Ireland  to  assist  them  :•  but,  after  murder- 
 ing a  number  of  his  fellow-covenanters  in  the 
 west,  tiiat  opposed  the  engagement,  Argyle,  Cas- 
 sils,  and  Lovvdon,  and  their  friends,  obliged  him 
 to   return  l)ack.      After  routing   the   engagers, 
 Cromwell   had   directly  marched   his  army  into 
 Scotland,  had  not  Argyle  and  his  party,  who  now 
 prcvaded  in  the  Committee  of  Estates,  represent- 
 ed  to   him   how  earnestly  the   Assembly,  and   a 
 consider(d)le  body  in  the  Parliament,  had  opposed 
 the  Hainiltonian  engagement  and  invasion  of  Eng- 
 land.— In  the  beginning  of  October,  the  Commis- 
 sion of  the  CTfueral  Assend)ly  appointed  a  reno- 
 vation  of  the  aoleinn  league  and  covenant,  with  a 
 solemn   acknowledgment  of  preceding   breaches 
 of  it,  and  engagement  to  duties,  which  the  Com- 
 
CHUnCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  269 
 
 mittee  of  Estates  ratified,  without  aunexing  any 
 penalty,  and  which  was  pretty  generally  complied 
 with  through  the  land.  Many  scandalous  cler- 
 gymen were  soon  after  deposed,  and  the  rest,  by 
 frequent  inquiries,  excited  to  their  work  ;  and, 
 for  a  year  or  two,  the  preaching  of  the  gospel 
 was  very  remarkably  blessed  through  the  land. 
 After  publishing  a  tract  against  association  with 
 malignantSf  idolaters^  and  the  like,  and  leaving  a 
 dying  testimony  against  the  same,  Mr.  G.  Gilles- 
 py,  moderator  of  the  preceding  Assembly,  died, 
 greatly  lamented. 
 
 The  Committee  of  Estates  called  a  Parlia- 
 ment, but  secluded  from  it  such  as  had  voted  for 
 duke  Hamilton's  engagement,  many,  if  not  most, 
 of  whom  professed  their  willingness  to  have  no 
 more  share  of  the  public  management.  After 
 spending  a  day  in  solemn  humiliation  and  fast- 
 ing, they  renewed  their  covenants  with  God  and 
 one  another,  as  directed  by  the  Commission. 
 They  repealed  all  the  acts  of  the  last  meeting  of 
 Parliament,  and  of  their  Committee  of  Estates, 
 which  authorized  or  promoted  Hamilton's  en- 
 gagement. They  approved  the  protestation  which 
 had  been  taken  against  it,  and  the  opposition 
 made  to  it  at  Machlin  moor.  They,  by  an  act 
 of  classes,  and  another  for  purging  the  army,  se- 
 cluded the  promoters  of  it,  and  all  malignant 
 and  scandalous  persons  from  all  places  of  power 
 and  trust,  and  even  from  the  army,  till  they  L'ive 
 proper  evidence  of  repentance.  They  approved 
 the  Commission's  solemn  testimonies  against  the 
 toleration  of  errors  and  sectaries  in  En^lanti. 
 They  enacted.  That  before  any  future  king  1)C 
 admitted  to  the  exercise  of  his  royal  power,  he 
 shall,   by   oath,  and  under  his   hand  and  seal. 
 
!?70  A  COMPKNDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 declare  his  allowance  of  the  national  covenant, 
 and  of  the  solemn  league,  and  oblige  himself 
 to  prosecute  the  ends  of  the  same,  in  his  sta- 
 tion ;  and  that  he  shall,  for  himself  and  his 
 successors,  agree  to  acts  of  Parliament,  en- 
 joinini^  the  solemn  league  and  covenant,  and  fully 
 cstablishini;  Pre.shj/trrutn  p;overnment^  the  Direc- 
 tory for  nor  ship ,  Confession  of  faith,  and  Cate- 
 chisms, as  approved  hy  the  Crcneral  Assembly 
 and  Parliament, — in  all  his  dominions  ;  and  that 
 Jie  shall  observe  these  in  his  own  j)ractice  and  fa- 
 mily, and  never  make  opposition  to,  or  endeavour 
 any  change  of  them  ;  and  that  he  shall  leave  all 
 counsel  and  counsellors  prejudicial  to  said  religion 
 and  covenants,  and  shall  give  satisfaction  to  his 
 Parliament  as  now  constituted,  in  what  other 
 things  they  find  necessary  for  the  civil  and  reli- 
 gious welfare  of  the  nation  ; — and  agree,  that  all 
 civil  matters  be  determined  by  the  Parliaments 
 of  this  kingdom,  and  all  church  affairs  by  the  Ge- 
 neral Assemblies.  They  ratified  three  acts  of 
 the  Assembly  and  Commission,  approving  the 
 larger  and  shortei'  Catechisms,  and  enjoining  the 
 renovation  of  the  covenant.  They  enacted.  That 
 drunkenness,  profane  swearing,  scolding,  obscene- 
 language,  uttered  or  printed,  mocking  at  piety, 
 and  drinking  of  healths,  be  punished,  and  the 
 guilty,  upon  their  fourth  conviction,  to  be  impri- 
 soned, till  they  find  security  for  their  good  beha- 
 viour, under  pain  of  L.400  to  noblemen,  400 
 merks  to  barons,  200  merks  to  gentlemen,  heri- 
 tors, and  burgesses,  L.40  to  yeomen,  and  L.20  to 
 servants  ; — that  such  as  married  in  a  clandestine 
 manner  should  be  imprisoned  three  months,  and 
 l)e  fined,  nol)lemen  in  L.6lK)(),  barons  and  landed 
 gentlemen   in  6000   merks,  gentlemen  and  bur- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  271 
 
 gesses  in  2000  merks,  and  others  in  500  nierks, 
 to  be  paid  before  they  should  be  liberated  ;  and 
 that  such  as,  according  to  the  act  of  IG%5,  are 
 nominated  to  lift  the  fines  or  inflict  corporal  pun- 
 ishments on  scandalous  persons,  accept  that  office, 
 and  deliver  up  the  fines  to  the  kirk  sessions  for 
 the  use  of  the  poor,  except  the  tenth  part,  which 
 is  allotted  to  the  officers  employed  in  executing 
 that  work : — that  going  of  mills  and  salt-pans,  or 
 fishing  of  salmon,  or  other  unnecessary  labour  on 
 the  Lord's  day,  be  punished ;  that  all  blasphem- 
 ers, and  revilers,  and  obstinate  deniers  of  God, 
 or  of  any  of  the  persons  of  the  Trinity,  and  all 
 worshippers  of  false  gods,  cursers  and  beaters  of 
 parents,  or  guilty  of  incest,  be  punished  with 
 death  ;  that  none  but  such  as  are  of  a  blameless 
 conversation,  and  apparently  well  affected  to  the 
 covenanted  reformation,  be  admitted  to,  or  con- 
 tinued in  any  place  of  power,  or  trust,  in  the 
 state,  army,  or  burghs  ; — and  that  all  commis- 
 sions, patents,  honours,  offices,  or  gifts,  received 
 from  his  majesty  before  he  give  satisfaction  to 
 his  Parliament,  are  null  and  void,  and  the  seek- 
 ers thereof  censurable.  They  made  an  act  for 
 contributions  of  assessments  on  parishes,  and  for 
 withholding  of  supply  from  sturdy  beggars,  and 
 for  relief  of  such  poor  as  are  willing,  but  unable 
 to  work, — and  for  relief  of  such  as  through  ship- 
 wreck, burning,  devastation,  or  the  like,  are  re- 
 duced to  poverty.  In  fine,  they  abolished  pa- 
 tronage as  a  Popish  corruption,  contrary  to  the 
 second  Book  of  discipline,  and  to  several  acts  of 
 Assembly,  and  prejudicial  to  the  liberty  of  the 
 Christian  people,  and  the  hee  calling  and  entry 
 of  ministers, — and  declared,  That  admission  by 
 the  Presbytery,  upon  the  call  of  the  congregation. 
 
272  A  COMI'ENDIOUS   1IIST(JJIY  OV  THE 
 
 shall  give  ministers  suflicient  right  and  title  t<» 
 their  manses,  glehes,  and  stipends; — meanwhile 
 declaring  the  patron's  right  to  the  tithes  as  he- 
 fore  ;  and  recommending  it  to  the  General  As- 
 semhly  to  estahlish  a  proper  rule  of  calling  mini- 
 sters, giving  to  Presbyteries  and  congregations 
 their  resj)ectivc  powcr^  in  that  matter. 
 
 I'his  Parliament  had  scarcely  begun  their  above 
 work,  whvn  they  received  information,  that  the 
 Sectarian  army  in  England  had  extruded  all  the 
 hearty  fjiends  of  monarchy  from  their  Parlia- 
 ment at  Westminster  ;  had  brought  back  his  Ma- 
 jesty from  the  Isle  of  Wight,  to  which  he  had 
 fled  from  them  ;  and  aj)})ointed  an  high  court  of 
 justice  to  try  him  for  his  liCe.  Shocked  with  these 
 things, both  church  and  state  appointed  their  com- 
 missioners at  London  to  exert  themselves  to  their 
 utmost  for  j)reventing  his  trial.  In  their  remon- 
 strance of  January  6th,  1619,  these  commission- 
 ers, in  name  of  the  kingdom  of  Scotland,  repre- 
 sented to  the  House  of  Commons,  the  several  en- 
 gagements the  two  kingdoms  had  lately  come 
 under,  with  res|)e(^t  to  religion  and  the  preserva- 
 tion of  his  majesty's  person  ;  and  earnestly  insist- 
 ed. That  no  violence  should  be  done  to  him,  and 
 nothing  at  all,  without  the  consent  of  both  king- 
 doms. Upon  the  16th  of  January,  the  Commis- 
 sion published  a  tcslimnnij  against  the  errors  and 
 comluct  of  the  Sectaries,  and  a  warning  to  their 
 fellow  covenanters  in  England,  which  were  pre- 
 sented to  the  House  of  Commons,  on  January 
 26. — Finding  the  Sectaries  determined  to  have 
 liis  Majesty's  liCe,  the  Scotch  commissioners  at 
 London,  in  nanu'  of  their  ParlianicMit,  in  January, 
 pri'scnlcd  to  the  Speaker  of  the  House  of  Com- 
 mons, a  solemn  protestation  against  it ;  and,  des- 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  273 
 
 pairirjf!^  of  success  with  them,  as  the  army  had 
 now  modelled  them,  they,  upon  the  'i-9th,  remon- 
 strated to  general  Fairfax  against  the  putting  of 
 his  Majesty  to  death,  as  horrid  and  scandalous. 
 He  was  nevertheless  beheaded  next  day,  pre- 
 tending to  die  a  martyr  for  the  laws  and  liberties 
 of  his  people,  of  whom  his  stubbornness,  pride, 
 and  treachery  had  produced  the  terrible  oppres- 
 sion, and  plunder,  and  even  the  death  of  perhaps 
 four  hundred  thousand  in  Britain  and  Ireland. 
 
 Informed  of  his  exit,  the  Scotch  covenanters, 
 infatuated  with  zeal  for  their  royal  family,  imme- 
 diately proclaimed  Charles,  his  eldest  son,  then 
 about  eighteen  years  of  age,  their  King,  and  pro- 
 mised to  defend   him    according    to   the  solemn 
 league  and  covenant  ;  but  declared,  that  he  be- 
 hoved to  give  satisfaction  concerning  religion  and 
 the  unity  of  the  kingdoms  secured  by  that  cove- 
 nant, before  he  be  admitted  to  the  exercise  of  his 
 royal  power;  an  information  of  which  they  trans- 
 mitted to  him  at  the  Hague,   by  Sir  Joseph  Dou- 
 glas, along  with  a  faithful  warning  from  the  Com- 
 mission.    And  as  the  English   House  of  Com- 
 mons had  excluded  him  from  their  crown,  they 
 transmitted  to  them  their  proclamation  of  him, 
 along  with  a  solemn  remonstrance,  in  which  they 
 represented  how  the  English  Parliament  had  all 
 along,  from  1 642,  solemnly  declared,  that  they  in- 
 tended no  hurt  to  his  Majesty's  person,  or  abridg- 
 ment of  his  authority — no  commonwealth  form 
 of  government — or  toleration  of  heretics,  blasphe- 
 mers, or  the  like; — and  remonstrated  against  the 
 violence  done  to  his  late  Majesty,  and  insisted  on 
 their  proclaiming  his  son  to  be  their  King,  and 
 that  no  toleration  should  be  given  to  heretics  or 
 blasphemers.     Highly  olTended  with  these  free- 
 
 2  N 
 
L'Tl'  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 (loms,  the  Sectarians,  who  now  ruled  as  they 
 pleased,  imprisoned  the  Commissioners  from  Scot- 
 land. Hut,  Ix'ini;  cpiitkly  convinced  that  this 
 was  an  infjin«;cment  of  the  law  of  nations,  they 
 conveyed  tnem  safe  to  their  own  country,  ^^ean- 
 while,  the  Scotch  Parliament  had  dispatched  the 
 Earl  of  Cassilis  and  Cieorge  Winram,  along  with 
 Messrs.  Bailie  and  Wood,  from  the  church,  to  ob- 
 tain projHT  satisfaction  from  Charles  at  the 
 Ila'^ue.  But  JNIontrose,  and  a  number  of  Eng- 
 lish malignants,  buoying  him  with  hopes  of  an 
 unhampered  access  to  Ireland,  \\  hence,  by  the  as- 
 sistance of  Ormond  and  his  malignant  or  Popish 
 friends,  he  might  force  his  way  to  the  English 
 and  Scotch  crown,  without  any  conditions,  he 
 despised  the  covenanters*  proposals. 
 
 I'he  General  Assembly  meeting  in  July,  ap- 
 proved and  ratified  the  deeds  of  the  late  Commis- 
 .sion,  and  approved  the  conduct  of  their  Commis- 
 sioners which  had  been  sent  to  deal  with  his  JNIa- 
 jesty.  They  prescribed  censures  for  such  as  had 
 assisted  IMontrose,  and  served  in  Hamilton's  en- 
 gagement ;  and  that  the  principal  offenders  be 
 not  re-admitted  to  communion  in  sealing  ordi- 
 nances, but  by  the  General  Assembly  or  their 
 Commission,  and  others  by  Presbyteries.  They 
 published  a  solemn  warning  relative  to  the  pre- 
 sent dangers,  and  the  necessary  duties  of  mini- 
 sters and  others  with  respect  to  them  ;  and  par- 
 ticularly the  necessity  of  obtaining  proj)er  secu- 
 rity from  his  Majesty  relative  to  religion,  and 
 the  exclusion  of  all  malignants  from  places  of 
 power  and  trust,  before  he  be  admitted  to  the  ex- 
 ercise of  his  royal  power.  They  wrote  a  brother- 
 ly  exhorljitioh  to  their  friends  in  England,  bewail- 
 ing the  broken  state  of  their  church  and  king- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  275 
 
 «?om,  and  beseeching  and  encouraging  them  to 
 cleave  to  their  duty  according  to  their  covenant 
 with  God.  In  a  letter  to  their  young  King,  they 
 declared  their  detestation  of  the  murder  of  his 
 father,  and  lamented  that  he  himself  had  con- 
 temned the  representations  presented  to  him  by 
 the  church's  Commissioners  ; — held  an  intimacy 
 with  Montrose,  a  perjured  rpurderer  of  many 
 thousands  of  his  best  subjects^  and  approved  his 
 conduct ; — and  had  settled  a  peace  with  the  Po- 
 pish murderers  in  Ireland,  and  granted  them  a 
 peace,  and  the  full  liberty  of  their  idolatry  and 
 other  abominations  ; — and  besought  him,  as  he 
 regarded  his  own  and  his  kingdom's  happiness, 
 to  submit  to  the  laws  of  Christ,  and  the  counsels 
 of  truth  and  peace.  They  prohibited  all  promis- 
 cuous dancing,  as  productive  of  scandal,  immodes- 
 ty, or  lasciviousness.  They  thanked  the  Parlia- 
 ment for  their  abolishing  of  Patronage  ;  begged 
 that  the  tithes  belonging  to  the  church  might 
 not  only  be  applied  for  ministers  stipends,  but 
 also  to  bear  other  pious  expenses  in  parishes;  and 
 they  appointed,  that  in  electing  of  ministers,  the 
 Session  should  be  the  proper  electors ;  but  the 
 members  of  the  congregation  should  be  asked 
 their  consent.  If  the  greater  part  of  a  congre- 
 gation dissented  from  the  choice  of  the  Session, 
 unless  it  was  plainly  causeless  prejudices,  the  can- 
 didate was  to  be  laid  aside.  But  if  only  a  lesser 
 part  dissented,  except  where  the  grounds  were 
 plainly  relevant  and  weighty,  the  Presbytery 
 should  proceed  to  the  trials  and  ordination,  but 
 in  such  a  manner  as  tended  to  bring  all  parties 
 to  an  harmonious  agreement. 
 
 Next  year,   1650,   the  Parliament  again  dis- 
 patched the  Earls  of  Cassilis  and  Lothian,  Alex- 
 
HlG  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 ander  Brodie,  and  George  Winram.  Lords  of  Ses- 
 sion, with  Messrs.  John  Smith  and  Alexander 
 Jaffray,  alonc^  with  Messrs.  John  Livin^:ston, 
 James  Wood,  and  (^eor^^c  Hutchinson,  to  Breda, 
 to  try  if  they  couU\  persuade  their  youn^  K.inf; 
 to  accept  of  the  terms,  upon  which  they  liad 
 ac^recci  t<>  a(hnit  him  to  exercise  his  royal  power. 
 Partly  by  the  treachery  of  Lothian  and  Winram 
 of  Lihherton,  and  partly  !)y  Charles's  exj)ecta- 
 tions  that  Montrose,  whom  he  had  appointed  to 
 invade  Scotland  from  the  North,  with  such  fo- 
 rei«;'ners  as  he  could  get,  would  procure  his  unli- 
 mited admission,  he  held  oiT  from  compliance 
 till  the  time  was  almost  wholly  elapsed.  But  un- 
 derstandins^  that  D.  Lesly  had  taken  JMontrose 
 prisoner,  >\  ith  his  commission  on  him,  and  scat- 
 tered his  3000  forciq;n  mercenaries  ;  and  that 
 CromwclTs  success  in  Ireland  had  rendered  him 
 altoi^cther  hopeless  of  availini^  himself  of  that 
 kiui^dom  ;  and  findini;-,  hy  Lihhcrton's  treachery, 
 that  the  Scotch  Committee  of  Estates  had  order- 
 ed their  Commissioners  to  break  of}^  all  treaty 
 with  him,  on  account  of  his  empowerini;' ■Montrose 
 to  attack  them  by  violence — he  pretended  to  com- 
 })ly  with  all  their  proposals,  enq-a'^ini;  himself  to 
 remove  from  his  counsels  all  that  stood  excom- 
 municated by  the  kirk  ; — to  take  the  national  co- 
 venant and  .solemn  leajrjte  and  covenavf.,  and  prose- 
 cute the  ends  of  them  ; — and  to  ratify  and  ap- 
 j)rove  all  acts  of  Parliament  enjoining-  these  cove- 
 ■nantSy  and  establishing"  Presbyterian  (yovernmcntj 
 ihe  Direcfonj  oj  n'or.s/iij>y  and  Confession  of  faith , 
 :iiul  Catechisms;  and  that  all  civil  matters  should 
 be  determined  by.  the  present  and  subsequent 
 Parliaments,  and  all  ecclesiastical  ones  by  the  Ge- 
 neral Assemblies.      Notwithstandiuii'  all  this,  he 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  977 
 
 continued  till  the  very  last,  to  use  the  English  li- 
 turgy at  Breda,  in  o{)|josition  to  all  that  the  ec- 
 clesiastical Commissioners  could  say  to  the  con- 
 trary. On  his  passage,  he  had  shewed  some  un- 
 willingness to  take  the  covenants;  but  his  malig- 
 nant friends  persuaded  him  to  comply.  Accor- 
 dingly, at  his  arrival  in  the  mouth  of  the  Spey, 
 June  23, 1650,  he  declared  his  willingness  to  swear 
 them ;  and  Mr.  Livingston,  who  had  with  reluc- 
 tance, and  not  without  being  decoyed  into  the 
 ship,  come  along  with  him,  as  he  thought  they 
 were  bringing  the  plague  of  God  to  their  country, 
 after  a  faithful  sermon,  administered  the  national 
 covenant  and  solemn  league  to  him,  which  he  swore 
 in  the  following  words  subjoined  to  them  :  "  I 
 "  Charles,  King  of  Great  Britain,  France  and  Ire- 
 "  land,  do  assure  and  declare,  by  my  solemn  oath, 
 "  in  the  presence  of  Almighty  God,  the  searcher 
 "  of  hearts,  my  allowance  and  approbation  of  the 
 **  national  covenant,  and  of  the  solemn  league  and 
 "  covenant  above  written,  and  faithfully  ol)lige 
 "  myself  to  prosecute  the  ends  thereof  in  my  sta- 
 "  tion  and  calling;  and  that  I,  for  myself  and  suc- 
 *'  cessors,  shall  consent  and  agree  to  all  acts  of 
 "Parliament  enjoining  i\\id  national  covenant,  and 
 '«  solemn  league  and  covenant,  and  fully  establish- 
 **  m^  Preshyterial government,  the  directory  ofxvor- 
 "  ship,  the  confession  of  faith  and  catechisms,  in  the 
 "  kingdom  of  Scotland,  as  they  were  approven  by 
 "  the  General  Assembly  of  this  kirk,  and  Parlia- 
 **  ment  of  this  kingdom  ;  and  that  I  shall  give 
 «•  my  royal  assent  to  the  acts  of  Parliament  en- 
 "  joining  thesafne  in  the  restof  my  dominions;  and 
 **  that  1  shall  observe  them  in  my  own  practice 
 **  and  family,  and  shall  never  make  opposition  to 
 "  any  of  these,  or  endeavour  any  change  thereof.** 
 
21S  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 — This  oath  he  immediately  subscribed,  and  iflf 
 other  things  submitted  as  pleasantly  as  he  could, 
 and  even  parted  with  the  new  Duke  of  Hamil- 
 ton and  witli  Lauderdale,  and  other  favourites. 
 But  hating^  every  thint^  that  looked  like  strict- 
 ness in  relif^ion,  and  especially  the  faithful  re- 
 proofs, which  he  received  from  time  to  time,  he 
 was  heartily  wearied  of  his  new  attendants. 
 
 Charles  having  refused  to  subscribe  and  pub- 
 lish an  acknowledgment  of  his  own  and  his  fa- 
 ther's wickedness,  and  declaration  of  his  future 
 resolutions,  offered  to  him  by  the  Committee  of 
 Estates,  and  Commission  of  the  General  Assem- 
 bly, many  of  the  members  of  which  exceedingly 
 suspected  him,  the  Commission  meeting  at  the 
 West  kirk  of  Edinburgh,  August  15,  1G50,  de- 
 clared, That  this  kirk  or  kingdom  did  not  own 
 or  espouse  any  malignant  party,  or  quarrel,  or  in- 
 terest, nor  would  fight,  but  merely  upon  their 
 former  grounds  and  principles,  in  defending  the 
 cause  of  (^od  and  the  kingdom,  as  they  had  done 
 these  twelve  years  past ;  and  that,  as  they  dis- 
 claimed the  sin  of  the  King  and  his  house,  they 
 would  not  own  him  or  his  interest,  but  in  subor- 
 dination to  God,  and  so  far  as  he  disclaims  his 
 own  and  father's  opposition  to  the  work  of  God 
 and  to  the  covenant — and  likewise  all  the  ene- 
 mies thereof;  and  that  they  would  quickly  mani- 
 fest the  same  to  Cromwel,  who,  marching  to  in- 
 vade their  country,  had,  in  pajiers  transmitted 
 to  them,  charged  them  with  the  contrary.  The 
 Committee  of  Estates,  that  same  day,  approved 
 and  heartily  concurred  in  this  declaration  of  the 
 state  of  any  war  for  defending  his  Majesty. — 
 Charles,  though  heartily  sorry,  that  he  could  not 
 get  his  malignant  friends  into  places  of  posvcr  and 
 
GHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  279 
 
 trust — to  engage  the  covenanters  to  withstand 
 Cromwel,  who  was  fast  approaching,  published 
 a  most  solemn  declaration  at  Dunfermline,  Au- 
 gust 16,  blessing  God  for  recovering  him  from  the 
 snare  of  his  malignant  counsellors;  confessing  and 
 bewailing  his  own  and  his  father's  hearkening  to 
 evil  counsels,  and  opposition  to  the  work  of  refor- 
 mation, and  to  the  solemn  league  and  covenant, 
 as  well  as  the  idolatry  of  his  mother,  and  tolera- 
 tion of  it  in  their  family;  and  his  own  encourage- 
 ment and  countenancing  of  the  Irish  Papists  ; — 
 and  declaring  his  deliberate,  and  judicious,  and 
 candid  approbation  of  the  national  covenant  and 
 solemn  league  and  covenant,  and  his  firm  resolution, 
 in  the  Lord's  strength,  to  prosecute  the  ends 
 thereof  in  his  station,  really,  constantly,  and  sin- 
 cerely, all  the  days  of  his  life ;  and  that,  in  order 
 to  this,  he  will  have  no  enemies  but  the  enemies 
 of  the  covenant,  or  friends  but  the  friends  of  it ; 
 and  that,  as  he  now  detested  all  Popery,  super- 
 stition, idolatry,  Prelacy,  error,  heresy,  schism,- 
 profaneness,  he  would,  to  the  utmost  of  his  power, 
 labour  to  extirpate  them  from  all  his  dominions ; 
 and  begging  and  requiring  all  such  of  his  sub- 
 jects, as  had  formerly  opposed  the  covenants  and 
 cause  of  God,  to  lay  down  their  enmity,  and  all 
 regard  to  human  interest,  as  opposed  to  the  in- 
 terest and  honour  of  God  ;  and  professing  that  he 
 would  only  reckon  these  his  best  servants  and 
 most  loyal  subjects,  who  served  him,  and  sought 
 to  promote  his  interests,  in  subordination  to  the 
 glory  of  God,  and  the  gospel  and  kingdom  of  Je- 
 sus Christ.  Mr.  Patrick  Gillespie  obtested  him, 
 in  the  name  of  Christ,  not  to  subscribe  this  de- 
 claration, no,  not  for  three  kingdoms,  if  he  had 
 ihe  smallest  hesitation  in  his  mind  concerning 
 
280  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 tlio  rio^htcousncss  of  it.  But  Charles  repeatedly 
 declared,  that  he  was  sat'isficd  in  his  mind  irith  it, 
 and  therefore  woidd  suhscrihe  it.  Not  lon^  af- 
 ter, he  solemnly  declared  his  fj^reat  ohhij^ations  to 
 the  iNIanjuis  of  Arjjfyle  for  liis  faithful  endeavours 
 to  restr)re  him  to  his  just  ri;;hts,  and  promised 
 Jiim  ills  hi*;hest  favour  and  IViendship,  and  digni- 
 ties which  he  could  confer,  toc^cther  with  pay- 
 ment of  I.. 4-0,000  of  deht;  and,  it  is  said,  secretly 
 promised  to  marry  his  daughter. 
 
 After  victory  had,  for  eif];-ht  days,  seemed  to 
 incline  to  the  side  of  the  Scots  army,  commanded 
 by  David  Lesly,  the  committee  of  war  obliged 
 him  to  leave  the  hill,  where  he  had  advantage- 
 ously [)osted  his  troops,  in  order  to  prevent  Crom- 
 weKs  escape  from  Dunbar,  Cromwel,  with  his 
 half  dead  forces,  overpowered  the  larger  army  of 
 the  Scotch  covenanters,  and  entirely  routed  tliem, 
 Sept.  3.  No  doubt  Cromwel,  who  had  been  be- 
 fore in  such  desperatelike  circumstances,  mighti- 
 ly rejoiced  in  his  victory  :  but  perhaps  not  so 
 iiiuch  as  Charles  did  over  the  death  and  captivity 
 of  so  many  of  his  covenanting  subjects,  that 
 seemed  so  bent  to  restrain  his  vicious  inclina- 
 tions. After  two  days  spent  in  solemn  fasting, 
 and  after  he  had  relincpiislud  the  covenan- 
 ters at  Perth,  in  order  to  throw  himself  into  an 
 army  of  malignants,  which  he  expected  IVliddle- 
 ton  had  rai>ed  for  him  in  the  North,  and  being 
 obliged  by  disappointment  to  return  to  Perth, 
 Charles  was  solenmly  crow ned  at  Scoon,  January 
 J,  in.3l,  and  again  swore  the  covenants,  as  he 
 had  done  about  six  months  before.  And  not  long 
 aft(  r,  he  and  his  i^arliament,  in  June,  ratified  all 
 his  pu'(  t'ding  treaties,  transactions,  engagements, 
 and  actions,  and  enacted   them  into  a  perpetual 
 
 4 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  2Sl 
 
 law:  and  it  was  expressly  provided,  That  in  all 
 succeeding  Parliaments,  every  member,  before 
 they  entered  on  business,  should  subscribe  the 
 covenant :  and  without  this,  the  constitution  of 
 the  Parliament  was  declared  void  and  null. 
 
 2  0 
 
A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY,  kc,  283 
 
 CHAPTER   VI. 
 
 Bf/thc  rash  Admission  ofK.  CJiarlcsII. — btj public  Resolu- 
 tions of  the  Commission  to  please  him — by  his  imlimit- 
 ed  Rcstoj'ation — Re-establihment  of'  Prelacy — Imposi- 
 tion of  sinful  Oaths  ayid  Declarations^  arid  Bonds — 
 And  terrible  Fei'secutiwi  cyf  all  faithful  Adherents  to 
 their  Covenants  with  God — arid  even  by  his  Indulgen- 
 cies  of  the  less  Faithful — and  by  the  Labours  of  K. 
 James  VII.  to  introduce  Popery ^  the  once  attained  Re- 
 formation is  almost  entirely  ruined,  between  1651  and 
 1688. 
 
 Ihese  solemn  transactions  of  Charles  and  his 
 malignant  friends,  were  but  a  scene  of  shocking- 
 dissimulation.  In  consequence  of  the  route  at 
 Dun!)ar,  and  of  a  lesser  defeat  at  Hamilton  a  lit- 
 tle after,  it  was  pretended,  that  the  English  could 
 nut  be  resisted,  unless  all  able  to  bear  arms  should 
 be  raised  without  distinction ;  and  Charles  and 
 his  Parliament  at  Perth,  required  the  quorum  of 
 the  Commission,  which  had  met  upon  a  sudden 
 call  at  that  place,  December  1 1<,  16.30,  to  deter- 
 mine what  persons  might  be  admitted  to  rise  in 
 arms  tu  assist  the  standing  forces  against  thear- 
 
28i  A   CO.MPKNDIOUS    HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 mics  of  the  Knglish  sectaries,  who,  contrary  to 
 tlio  soh'f/in  lca<^2ic  and  vnvtnanty  had  must  unjustly 
 invadetl,  ami  were  destroyinf:^  the  kingdom?  'J'o 
 this  the  Commission  replied,  That,  in  this  case  oi' 
 so  great  necessity,  ihey  could  not  he  against  rais- 
 ing all  able  to  hear  arms,  excepting  excommuni- 
 caied,  Ibrfeited,  or  notoriously  j)rof'ane  or  flagi- 
 tious persons  ;  or  who  had  heen  long  continued 
 and  inveterate  ()i)posers  of  the  covenant  and  cause 
 of  (lod;  providing  always, that  none  should  he  put 
 into  such  trust  and  power,  as  may  he  prejudicial 
 to  the  cause  of  (Jud  ;  and  that  such  officers  as  are 
 of  known  integrity  and  affection  to  the  cause,  and 
 ])articularly  such  as  have  sufTered  in  former  wars, 
 jje  preferred.  In  consecpience  of  this  resolution, 
 several  of  the  general  officers,  and  more  than  half 
 nf  the  colonels  employed  were  malignants,  and 
 not  a  few  of  them  such  as  had  been  with  .Alon- 
 trose. — These  proceedings  were  exceedingly  o(- 
 fcnsive  to  many  ministers  and  Presbyteries,  par- 
 ticidarly  to  those  of  Stirling  and  Aberdeen,  wiiich 
 represented  their  dissatisfaction  to  the  next  meet- 
 ing of  the  Commission.  For  their  public  testi- 
 monies against  them,  IMessrs.  (iutlny  and  Den- 
 net  of  Stirling,  were  called  f)efore  Charles  and 
 his  comviittcc  of  Estates  at  Perth,  l^ut  they,  by 
 repeated  protestation,  declined  the  jurisdiction 
 of  his  INIajesty  and  his  Committee  as  not  proper 
 judges  in  matters  of  doctrine,  which  pertained  to 
 the  church.  INTeanwhile,  the  Commission,  pro- 
 voked with  the  opposition  of  ministers  and  Pres- 
 byteries to  their  answer,  published  a  vindication 
 of  it,  prohibited  all  miiiisters  or  preachers  to 
 speak  or  write  against  it,  and  ordained  Presbyte- 
 rii's  to  censure  such  as  op[>used  it  ;  and,  to  pre- 
 vent their  being  members,  urdained  all  such  as 
 3 
 
CHURCH   OK   SCOTLAND.  2S5 
 
 Opposed  it,  to  be  cited  as  scandalous  to  the  next 
 Assembly  at  St.  Andrew's. 
 
 Highly  pleased,  that  he  had  thus  sent  the  co- 
 venanting clergy  a  tearing  of  one  another,  and  es- 
 pecially trampling    the    strict    party,  whom   he 
 most  heartily  hated,  under  their  feet,  he,  and  the 
 nialignants,  whom  he  had  got  into  the  army,  in 
 order  that  they  and  their  friends  might  get  into 
 the  judicatures,  required  the  Commission  to  de- 
 termine, whether,  for  the  more  effectual  prosecu- 
 tion of  the  public  I'csolutions  for  the  defence  of  the 
 King  and  kingdom,  such  could  lawfully  be  mem- 
 bers of  the  Committee  of  Estates,  who  were  de- 
 barred from  public  trust  by  the  ad  of  classes,  pro- 
 viding they  have  since  satisfied  tiie  kirk  for  their 
 oft'ence,  and  been  admitted   to  enter  into  cove- 
 nant ?  And  whether  it  would  be  sinful  to  repeal 
 the  act  of  classes?   To  these  the  Commission  re- 
 plied. That  as  their  solemn  covenants  and  decla- 
 rations mentioned  as  grounds,  in  the  act  of  classes, 
 did  not  particularly  determine  what  time  such 
 persons  should  be  excluded  from  })laces  of  trust, 
 for  by-past  offences,  but  only  bind  to  the  due  pu- 
 nishing of  offenders,   and  to  purge  judicatories 
 and  places  of  power  and  trust,  and  to  endeavour, 
 according  to  the  law  of  God,  to  have  them  filled 
 only  with  such  as  are  of  known  affection  to  the 
 cause  of  God,  and  of  a  blameless,  C'hristian  con- 
 versation— nothing  hindered  the  Parliament  to 
 admit  such  secluded  persons  to  be  members  of 
 the  Committee  of  Estates,   and  to  take  off  the 
 censures  inflicted  upon  them  by  the  act  of  classes, 
 providing  they  have  satisfied  the  church  for  their 
 ofl'ences,  and  have  renewed  and  taken  the  cove- 
 nant, and  l)e  qualitird  f«»r  such   f>laces,  according 
 to  the  wold  ol  God,  and  late  ackiiowlcdginent  of 
 
Jio         A  coMrKN'nioijs  histouy  of  thk 
 
 v///.y,  and  cnf^afi'cment  to  duties.     In  consequence 
 ol*  tills  answer,  tin*  act  of  classes  was  repealed, 
 and  nndtitudes  of  niali^nants  and  profane  per- 
 sons, upon  a  mock  profession  of  repentance,  were 
 aflinitted  menil)cr?>  of  Parliament  and  Committee 
 of   Instates,   and  into  i)laces  ol   power  and  trust, 
 and  soon  had  the  whole  management  of  the  na- 
 tion in  their  hands.     Thus  multitudes  thcji,  and 
 ever  .shici\  have  been  admitted  to  he  the  minlsiers 
 of  God  for  good  to  the  nation,  in  a  way  of  tramp- 
 Jin2^  on  the  law  of  God,  and  plain  violation  of  our 
 solemn  covenants  with  him.     No  wonder,  there- 
 fore, that  so  many  of  them  prove  a  curse  to  us 
 instead  of  a  blessini^.    Nor  is  it  any  wonder,  that 
 the  synod  of  Glasf^ow,  and  especially  the  forces 
 of  the  five  south-western  shires,  presented  such 
 remonstrances  to  the  Commission  and  Committee 
 of  Instates  at  Perth,  against  the  rash  admission 
 of  Charles  to  his  crown,  without  any  proof  of  his 
 sincerity,  and  ai^ainst  all  junction  with  his  favou- 
 rite malii^nants,  the  last  of  which  Charles  and  liis 
 (Committee  of  Instates  voted  to  he  trecusonahle : 
 J)ut,  about  fifteen  members,  who  disliked  the  pa- 
 per itself,  dissented. 
 
 As  the  Commission,  to  maintain  their  own 
 ground,  had  enacted,  that  none  who  opposed  theii 
 resolutions  should  be  achiiitted  mcndjers  of  their 
 ensuinp^  Assembly,  and  had  wrote  circular  letters 
 (')  Presbyteries  for  that  elfect,  and  to  cite  the 
 more  active  opposers  as  pannels  to  the  bai,  their 
 own  party  punctually  obeyed  them.  In  Presby- 
 teries where  they  had  a  majority,  none  but  friends 
 of  the  resolutions  were  chosen  for  their  Commis- 
 i»ioners;  and  where  they  were  the  minority,  they 
 cither  protested  a;;ainot  the  choice,  or  withdrew 
 ami  elected  one  by  themselves.      When  the  As- 
 
CHURcrf  or  Scotland.  287 
 
 semhly  mot  at  St.  Aiuliew's,  July  18,  10,31,  a 
 consi(lorM!)le  body  of  ministers  presented  a  peti- 
 tion, earnestly  beseeching'  them,  That,  as  the  act 
 and  letter  of'theCommission  had  hindered  the  free 
 election  of  Commissioners,  by  which  many  of  the 
 most  eminent  abilities,  and  constant  faithfulness 
 and  zeal,  had  been  secluded,  and  as  many  elec- 
 tions were  questionable,  on  account  of" their  not 
 being  made  in  due  order,  or  of  persons  qualified 
 according  to  the  constitutions  of  this  church  ;  and 
 as  many  Commissioners  were  hindered  from  at- 
 tendance by  the  English  troops,  who  were  mas- 
 ters of  almost  all  the  country  south  and  westward 
 of  the  Forth — the  meeting  might  be  adjourned 
 for  a  time,  and  the  act  and  letter  of  the  Commis- 
 sion declared  no  bar  of  electing  such  for  members 
 as  remain  unsatisfied  with  the  j;?^6/ic'  rcwhdions ; 
 and  that  it  might  be  recommended  to  Presbyte- 
 ries to  elect  men  of  approved  abilities  and  inte- 
 grity, against  whom  there  could  be  no  exception 
 by  the  acts  and  constitutions  of  this  church;  and 
 that,  in  the  mean  time,  a  solemn  fast  be  observ- 
 ed through  the  whole  land  in  order  to  entreat 
 the  Lord  to  shew  the  causes  of  his  contending; 
 and  that  by  his  giving  light  on  all  hands,  he  would 
 graciously  heal  their  divisions.  The  prevailing 
 party,  many  of  whom  had  been  long  galled  with 
 the  faithfulness  and  credit  of  the  antlrcsolidioncrs, 
 scorned  to  regard  this  request ;  but,  having  con- 
 stituted themselves,  and  resolved  to  proceed  U) 
 business,  sustained  the  elections  of  such  Com- 
 missioners as  they  hoped  would  favour  the  rcso/u 
 fio7i6\  and  of  as  few  others  as  possible.  Their  oj)- 
 ponents  therefore  solemnly  protected,  that  the 
 meeting  could  not  be  held  a  /rre  a?id  lairful  C^e- 
 neral  Assembly  of  the  church  of  Scot  hind — in  re- 
 
288  A   COMIM-.NDIOUS   UISIJTOKV  or  TUF. 
 
 ^ard,  tliat  tlir  Cvvc  vlvcl'um  of  Commissioners  had 
 heen  prclimitrd  liy  tlic  letter  and  ad  of  the  Com- 
 mission al)<>vt'  ini'iitionod  ;  in  re^-ard  many  Com- 
 missions s  could  not  attend  on  aecount  of  the  mo- 
 tions of  the  Kni^lish   army  in  the  country;  ami 
 in  reL,^ard  that  many  of  the  Commissioners  of  the 
 preeedini^  Assemhly    had    betrayed    their  trust, 
 and  had,  in  their  remonstrances  and  papers,  stir- 
 red up  the  civil  magistrate  against  their  brethren 
 who  remained  dissatisfied  with   their  public  reso- 
 Inthms ;  and  who,  by  their  above  mentioned  act 
 and  letter,  had   prelimited   the   freedom  of  the 
 court,  were  admitted  members  of  it,  and  their  mo- 
 deratorchosen  to  be  moderatorof  it, notwithstand- 
 ing they  had  been  regularly  and   timeously  ex- 
 cepted against  as  not  admittable,  till  their  pro- 
 ceedings should  be  tried  and  approved  by  the  As- 
 sembly ;  and  in  regard,  that  his  iMajesty,  by  his 
 letter,  and  his  Commissioner,  by  his  speech,  have 
 ex(^ited  them  to    persecuting    measures  against 
 su(  h  as  remain  unsatisfied  with  the  proceedings 
 of  the  late  Commission,  before  they  be  tried  and 
 approved  by  the  Assembly  itself:  And  they  pro- 
 tested in  their  own  name,  and  of  all  ministers, 
 ruling  elders,  and  others,   in  the  church  of  Scot- 
 land,  that  should  adhere  to  them.  That,  as  this 
 nieeting  of  Assembly  was  woi  free,  laxcfuJ,  or  valid 
 in  its  constitution,  they  had  no  power  of  jurisdic- 
 tion in  determining  controversies — making  acts — 
 (Muitting  declarations — -judging  protests,  appeals 
 IVom,   or   proceedings  of  inferior  judicatories — ■ 
 eensuring  persons  or  paper — or  in  issuing  forth 
 Conunissions  :    And  particularly  they  protested. 
 That  they  might  not  proceed  to  approve  or  jus- 
 tifv  the  det'ds  of  the  late  Connnission,  which  con- 
 tained manv  things  contvaiy  to  the  trust  conunit- 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  289 
 
 ted  to  it,  in  allowing  and  carrying  on  a  conjunc- 
 tion with  malignants,  and  bringing  them  into 
 places  of  power  and  trust,  in  the  army  and  judi- 
 catories, contrary  to  the  word  of  God,  solemn 
 leagm  and  covenant,  late  acknoiuledgment  of  sins 
 and  engagement  to  duties,  and  to  the  constant  te- 
 nor of  former  declarations,  warnings,  remon- 
 strances, causes  of  humiliation,  supplications, 
 acts,  and  constitutions  of  this  church  ;  and  fur- 
 ther protested.  That  all  their  determinations, 
 acts,  ratifications,  declarations,  sentences,  cen- 
 sures, or  commissions,  should  be  held  null  and 
 void,  no  way  binding  on  the  church  of  Scotland — 
 and  that  it  should  be  free  for  themselves  and  all 
 such  as  adhered  to  them,  to  exercise  their  minis- 
 try, and  enjoy  their  Christian  liberty  according 
 to  the  word  of  God,  and  our  covenants,  and  other 
 acts  and  constitutions  of  this  church;  and  that  it 
 shall  be  free  for  them  to  choose  Commissioners, 
 and  meet  in  a  free,  lawful  General  Assembly, 
 when  the  Lord  shall  give  opportunity  for  it. 
 Lord  Warriston,  by  a  letter  to  this  Assembly,  re- 
 presented, in  a  multitude  of  constitutions  of  this 
 church  between  1560  and  1650,  how  faithful  mi- 
 nisters had  withstood  the  civil  magistrate's  judg- 
 ing of  their  doctrine  by  themselves,  and  how,  by 
 protestations,  the  Lord  had,  from  time  to  time, 
 kept  up  a  testimony  for  his  truths  and  cause ; 
 and  he  protested  against  the  Assembly's  ratifica- 
 tion of  the  paper,  in  which  the  late  Commission 
 had  approved  to  the  Parliament  their  confine- 
 ment of  the  ministers  of  Stirling,  for  their  preach- 
 ing against  the  countenancing  of  malignants,  or 
 of  any  other  paper  of  theirs,  prejudicial  to  the 
 cause  of  Christ. 
 
 2  P 
 
290  A  COMPENDIOUS    IIISTOIIY  01-    THE 
 
 Ilet»artllcss  of  all  opposition  from  their  pious 
 opponents,  the  Assembly  pushed  forward  in  esta- 
 biishini;-  themselves,  and  gratifying"  Charles  and 
 liis  malignant  dissemblers.  They  deposed  .hrcc, 
 and  sus])endcd  o/ie,  of  the  ministers  who  had  pro- 
 tested against  the  validity  of  their  constitution, 
 and  ratified  all  the  proceedings  of  the  late  Com- 
 mission. Their  oj)i)onents  therefore  quickly  pulj- 
 lished  their  j)roofs,  that  this  meeting  was  no  iree 
 lawful  General  Assembly  of  the  church  of  Scot- 
 land, viz,  J.  That  the  Commission,  by  their  act 
 and  letter  to  Presbyteries,  had  plainly  restricted 
 the  freedom  of  the  election  of  the  members  of  it, 
 in  directing  them  to  choose  none  but  such  as  con- 
 curred with  the  public  resolutions ;  and  had  inti- 
 mated, that  dissenters  from  these  resolutions  ought 
 to  be  looked  on,  not  as  fit  to  be  members,  but  as 
 transgressors  to  be  cited  as  j)annels  ;  had  declar- 
 ed, that,  if  any  such  should  be  chosen,  they  would 
 not  be  admitted  to  be  judges,  but  obliged  to  an- 
 swer at  the  bar  as  guilty  offenders ;  and  that 
 Presbyteries,  which  should  choose  such,  should 
 be  looked  upon  as  disobedient  contemners  of  the 
 public  order  of  the  kirk.  2.  That  many,  who  had 
 been  excepted  against,  as  guilty  of  betraying- 
 their  trust,  and  of  a  scandalous  apostacy  from 
 their  sworn  reformation,  and  conspiring  with  the 
 enemies  of  our  religion, — had,  contrary  to  the 
 constitutions  and  former  practice  of  this  church, 
 been  sustained  members,  without  trying  their  con- 
 duct, the  facts  and  sinfulness  of  wliich  was  ofler- 
 ed  to  be  proved  ;  and  even  been  admitted  to 
 judge  of  the  relevancy  of  the  objections  offered 
 against  their  being  sustained  judges.  S.  There 
 was  \\i)  proper  freedom  of  debate  on  the  ])rinci- 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  291 
 
 pal  points  necessary  to  be  handled,  as  the  Com- 
 mission had  stirred  up  the  civil  magistrate  against 
 their  brethren  who  disapproved  their  pithlic  re- 
 solutions;  in  consequence  of  which  the  ministers 
 of  Stirling  had  been  confined,  and  the  Parliament 
 had  ordered  all  such  to  be  proceeded  against  as 
 enemies  to  religion  and  the  kingdom.  The  Com- 
 mission had,  by  their  warnings  and  letters,  stir- 
 red up  Presbyteries  to  censure  them,  or  cite  them 
 to  the  Assembly  as  scandalous  transgressors,  and 
 many  of  them  had  been  cited  accordingly.  The 
 king,  by  his  letter,  and  his  commissioner,  by  his 
 speech,  had  stirred  up  the  Assembly  to  take  such 
 severe  methods  with  them,  as  might  deter  others 
 from  ever  doing  the  like  : — all  which  the  Assem- 
 bly had  first  connived  at,  and  then  approved. 
 4.  Persons  were  not  allowed  to  speak  their  mind 
 in  this  Assembly,  and  the  letter  of  Lord  Warris- 
 ton,  who  was  an  elected  commissioner,  and  had 
 been  singularly  faithful  and  active,  and  acquaint- 
 ed with  the  constitutions  of  this  church,  was  ob- 
 stinately refused  a  reading.  5.  On  account  of 
 the  roving  bands  of  the  English,  and  even  of  the 
 Scotch  army  in  the  heart  of  the  country,  many 
 members  could  not  attend,  and  none  at  all  from 
 nine  or  ten  Presbyteries ;  and,  even  in  their  re- 
 turn home,  his  Majesty  and  his  Committee  of  Es- 
 tates had  apprehended  and  confined  severals,  be- 
 cause they  had  not  shewed  themselves  friendly 
 enough  to  the  public  resohdions,  6.  That  the 
 members  of  the  late  Commission,  before  any  ap- 
 probation of  their  proceedings,  were  admitted  as 
 judges  of  a  protestation,  which  insisted,  That 
 these  proceedings  should  not  be  ratified,  because 
 contrary  to  the  word  of  God,  and  their  solemn 
 covenants  and  constitutions,  and  in  judging  of 
 
292  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY   OF  THE 
 
 the  Protestors,  in  order  to  censure.  Nay,  tliat 
 the  committee,  which  managed  the  condemnation 
 of  the  protestation,  chiefly  consisted  of  members 
 of  the  Commission  The  Uesolutioners,  for  whom 
 it  is  shocking  to  find  not  only  Bailie,  but  Dick- 
 son and  Douglas,  zealous  advocates,  published  a 
 vindication  of  their  Assembly  and  conduct,  and 
 condemned  the  above  mentioned  protestation  as 
 liighly  criminal.  But  their  reasonings  were  suf- 
 ficiently refuted  by  their  opponents. 
 
 Charles  and  his  army  being  entirely  routed  at 
 Worcester  by  the  English  forces,  Sept.  3,  16'.51, 
 such  as  had  been  appointed  members  of  the  Com- 
 mission by  the  Assembly  1650,  and  sundry  of 
 their  friends,  who  disliked  the  public  resolutions, 
 soon  after  drew  up  a  Representation  of  the  causes 
 of  God^s  wrath  against  the  nation,  and  an  acknoit'- 
 Icdgemcnt  of  the  s'nis  of  the  ministrij,  the  most  full 
 and  candid,  perhaps,  that  ever  was  published  in 
 the  Christian  church.  In  their  Causes  of  God's 
 urathi  they  mention,  and  illustrate  by  instances 
 and  aggravations,  and  by  many  scripture  proofs 
 of  their  sinfulness  and  ruinous  influence,  the  fol- 
 lowing, viz.  Gross  ignorance  ;  looseness  and  pro- 
 fanity in  opposition  to  all  God's  commandments  ; 
 the  despising  and  neglecting  of  Jesus  Christ,  and 
 his  word  and  ordinances  ;  neglect  of  family  reli- 
 gion and  the  power  of  godliness,  or  even  loathing 
 and  bearing  it  down  ;  base  love  of  the  world,  is- 
 suing in  covetousness  and  oppression,  and  even 
 l)erjuries  ;  abuse  and  prostitution  of  the  public 
 faith  of  the  kingdom  ;  hypocritical,  carnal,  and 
 selfish  prosecution  of  covenanting,  and  other  ne- 
 cessary and  religious  duties  ;  deep  security,  im- 
 penitence, obstinacy,  and  incorrigibleness  under 
 manifold  signs  and  tokens  of  the  Lord's  anger  j 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  293 
 
 fearful  backslidings  from  attained  reformation 
 and  covenant  engagements,  in  falling  from  once 
 attained  singleness  and  honesty  of  heart,  fervency, 
 zeal  for  God,  spiritual  liveliness,  tenderness  of 
 conscience,  and  purity  of  conversation  ; — in  some 
 falling  off  more  secretly,  and  others  more  open- 
 ly to  the  malignant  party,  headed  by  Montrose, 
 and  afterward  by  duke  Hamilton  ; — in  neglect- 
 ing, hindering,  or  condemning  the  purging  of  the 
 judicatories  and  army  in  1649,  and  afterward, 
 according  to  covenant  engagements  ; — in  agree- 
 ing to  invest,  and  actually  investing  the  king 
 with  the  government  of  the  nation,  notwithstand- 
 ing many  clear  evidences  of  his  disaffection  and 
 enmity  to  the  work  and  people  of  God ; — in  re- 
 fusing manifold  discoveries  of  guilt  given  in  tes- 
 timonies of  Synods,  Presbyteries,  and  other  re- 
 monstrances and  representations  ; — in  the  public 
 resolutions  of  both  kirk  and  state,  for  bringing 
 malignants  into  the  army  and  into  places  of 
 power  and  trust ; — in  joining  in  arms  with  the 
 forces  of  the  king,  after  the  malignants  had  the 
 principal  management  of  them,  and  were  by  them 
 carrying  on  their  own  ends  ; — the  prelimiting 
 and  corrupting  of  the  General  Assembly, — rati- 
 fying former  defections,  and  commencing  perse- 
 cution against  the  faithful  opposers  thereof, 
 
 In  the  Acknowledgement,  they  point  out  the  sins 
 of  ministers,  before  their  entrance  into  their  of- 
 fice,— in  their  entering  into  it,  and  during  their 
 continuance  in  it, — in  their  private  and  their  so- 
 cial conduct, — in  their  ministerial  work,  preach- 
 ing of  the  gospel,  dispensing  the  sacraments,  vi- 
 siting families  and  sick,  catechising,  ruling  and 
 ^-ensuring,  and  in  respect  of  public  matters. 
 
29i<  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 Nothwithstandinp^  General  Monk  had  subdu- 
 ed these  parts  of  the  nation  which  Cromwel 
 had  left  unconcjuered,  and  all  tin*  counties  had, 
 on  the  2d  April,  1652,  acknowledged  the  sove- 
 reipity  of  the  English,  the  General  Assembly  met 
 at  Edinburgh  in  July.  Lord  Waniston,  Messrs. 
 Andrew  Cant,  John  Livmgston,  Samuel  Ruther- 
 foord,  and  thirty-two  others,  presented  to  them 
 a  representation,  protest,  and  proposals  signed  by 
 sixty-seven  ministers,  and  ninety-five  ruling  elders, 
 probationers,  and  others,  in  which  they  lament. 
 The  great  inward  and  open  apostacy  from  once  at- 
 tained reformation,  and  that  an  approbation  of 
 the  public  resolutions  was  now  considered  as  the 
 principal  qualification  of  candidates  for  the  holy 
 ministry,  or  of  screening  scandalous  ministers 
 from  censure,  and  that  notwithstanding  the 
 changed  circumstances  of  the  kingdom  by  the 
 prevalence  of  Cromwel  and  his  sectaries,  and  the 
 complete  rout  and  flight  of  Ring  Charles,  so  much 
 use  had  been  made  of  the  authority  of  the  last 
 year's  Assembly,  begun  at  St.  Andrew's,  and 
 thereafter  removed  to  Dundee  ; — and  earnestly 
 and  solemnly  beseeching  them.  That  since  many 
 commissioners  were  restrained  from  attendance, 
 and  the  far  greater  part  of  the  commissions  of 
 those  that  had  come  up,  were  controverted  by 
 dissents  and  protests  at  their  election  ;  and,  since 
 their  Ibrmer  conduct  had  so  much  hindered  re- 
 formation, and  the  edification  of  souls, — they 
 would  not  constitute  themselves  into  an  Assem- 
 bly, but  appoint  a  free  and  friendly  conversation, 
 in  order  to  remove  difficulties,  and  fall  on  some 
 licaling  overtures.  vVnd  they  laid  before  them 
 the   1  olio  wing  Proposals   for  removing   offences. 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  295 
 
 and  restorini^  mutual  harmony  and  confidence, 
 I.  That  they  will  ^ive  proper  evidence  of  their 
 approbation  of,  and  adherence  to  the  national  co- 
 venant and  solemn  league,  late  acknowledgment  of 
 sins  and  engagement  to  duties,  and  other  laudable 
 acts  of  uncontroverted  Assemblies,  and  act  ac- 
 cording to  them  in  dispensing"  of  sealing  ordi- 
 nances, censuring  offenders,  or  absolving  peni- 
 tents. ^.  That  it  be  considered,  how,  after  our 
 sad  defection  and  fearful  judgments,  we  may  ho- 
 nour the  Lord,  obtain  his  favour,  and  prevent  like 
 apostacy  from  him.  3.  That  a  proper  method 
 be  established  for  securing  against  error,  heresy 
 and  schism  on  the  one  hand,  and  against  the 
 danger  of  malignancy  on  the  other  ;  and  that 
 proper  marks  be  fixed,  by  which  malignants  may 
 be  known  and  judged.  4.  That  proper  methods 
 be  taken,  according  to  the  rules  of  this  church, 
 for  purging  out  intruders  and  scandalous  persons 
 from  the  ministerial  office  ;  and  that  none  be 
 hereafter  admitted,  but  such  as  have  the  positive 
 qualifications  required  by  the  word  of  God  and 
 constitutions  of  this  church.  5.  That  proper  rules 
 be  fixed  and  practised  for  censuring  of  scandals, 
 and  debarring  the  ignorant  and  profane  from  the 
 Lord's  table.  6.  That  care  be  taken,  that  none 
 be  absolved  from  censure,  but  such  as  give  that 
 evidence  of  their  repentance,  which  the  word  of 
 God  and  constitutions  of  this  church  require.  7. 
 That  an  effectual  course  be  taken  to  prevent  fur- 
 ther hurt  from  the  controverted  constitutions 
 and  procedure  of  the  Assembly  at  St,  Andrew's 
 and  Dundee,  and  for  securing  the  right  constitu- 
 tion of  the  Assemblies  in  time  coming. 
 
 These  requests  and  proposals  being  altogether 
 disregarded,   they   presented   another   paper,   in 
 
206  A   COMPENDIOUS    HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 which  they  observe,  how  they  had  been  contemn- 
 ed ;  how  an  Asseml)ly  indicted  by  the  null  meet- 
 ing of  Dundee,  had  been  pretended  to  be  the  on- 
 ly method  oC  healini^^  their  divisions  ;  how  these, 
 once  hearty  promoters  of  Prelacy,  having-  gotten 
 the  ascendant  in  judicatories,  had  more  than  ever 
 manifested  tiieir  contempt  of  their  covenant  en- 
 gagements, and  covenanted  reformation, — and 
 had  become  persecutors  of  such  as  were  endea- 
 vouring faithfully  to  adhere  to  the  Lord  and  his 
 cause,  according  to  their  solemn  vows  : — they  de- 
 clare their  adherence  to  their  former  testimonies 
 against  their  apostacy,  and  protest,  That  the  con- 
 stitution and  acts  of  this  Assembly  shall  be  held 
 jiull  and  void,  and  not  binding  by  virtue  of  any 
 authority  derived  from  them.  1.  Because  it  de- 
 rived its  indiction  and  autliority  from  the  pretend- 
 ed Assembly  of  St.  Andrew's  and  Dundee  last 
 year.  2.  It  is  for  the  most  part  constituted  of 
 the  same  kind  of  persons  as  it,  who  have  begun, 
 supi)orted,  and  carried  on  a  course  of  defection, 
 contrary  to  the  word  of  God,  and  the  covenants 
 and  constitutions  of  this  church.  3.  Because,  by 
 the  act  of  that  i)retended  Assembly,  last  year, 
 which  required  all  Presbyteries  and  Synods  to 
 inflict  censures  upon  all  ministers,  probationers, 
 students,  and  private  Christians,  who  opposed 
 the  public  resolutions,  and  did  not  acquiesce  in 
 their  acts, — all  opposers  are  rendered  incapable 
 f»r  election,  and  in  consequence  of  it,  several  Sy- 
 nods and  Presbyteries,  in  their  approbation  of  the 
 ihnuls  of  that  Assembly,  had  made  several  preli- 
 initations.  k  Many  Presbyteries  had  refused  to 
 send  up  commissioners  to  this  meeting,  as  a  Ge- 
 neral Ass(Mnbly  of  the  church  of  Scotland  ;  and 
 lUo  election  of  such  as  liave  come  up  as  commis- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  297 
 
 sioners,  is  generally  controverted. Regardless 
 
 of  all  these  things,  the  Assembly  proceeded  to 
 business,  and  enacted.  That  scandalous  ministers 
 or  others  should  be  duly  restored  to  their  office 
 and  church  fellowship,  not  without  evidence  of 
 thorough  repentance  ;  and  that  none  should  be 
 licensed  to  preach  the  gospel,  or  ordained  to  be 
 ministers  or  ruling  elders,  or  be  commissioned  to 
 Presbyteries  or  Synods,  before  they  give  it  under 
 their  hand,  that  they  approve  of  the  public  reso- 
 lutions,  or  at  least  will  never  make  any  opposi- 
 tion to  them  : — but  refused  to  a[)prove  a  decla- 
 ration in  favours  of  Independency  and  toleration 
 of  errors,  which  some  of  the  English  had  present 
 €d  to  them. Finding  the  Scotch  clergy  ex- 
 tremely attached  to  their  king,  Cromwel  would 
 not  allow  them  to  hold  any  more  General  Assem- 
 blies ;  and  sometimes  his  officers  drove  them  out 
 of  their  Synods.  This  did  the  less  hurt,  as  the 
 resolutioners,  in  their  courts,  chiefly  aimed  at 
 supporting  their  own  authority,  and  crushing 
 their  protesting  brethren. 
 
 Deprived  of  civil  assistance  from  Charles  and 
 his  malignant  favourites,  to  persecute  the  protcs- 
 toj's  by  fines,  imprisonment,  or  death,  the  public 
 resolutioners  persecuted  them  with  manifold  re- 
 proaches, as  miners  of  their  king  and  country, — 
 as  favourers  of  the  English  sectaries  and  their 
 usurpations, — as  renters  of  the  church,  and  the 
 like  ;  and  lalioured  to  their  utmost  to  keep  these 
 of  their  principles  from  any  ministerial  charges, 
 which,  in  divers  places,  occasioned  a  protesting 
 minister  and  a  resolutioner  in  the  saine  congre- 
 gation. So  ternble  were  their  torrents  of  re- 
 proach and  calumny,  that  even  Principal  Bailie, 
 notwithstanding  all  his  coolness,  prudence,  piety, 
 2  Q 
 
S98  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 and  learninp^,  appears,  in  his  letters,  ready  to  re- 
 ceive and  spread  ill-ijroiinded  calumnies,  to  black- 
 en the  characters  of  his  mo^t  eminent,  and,  a  lit- 
 tle before,  dearly  beloved  brethren.  The  uncom- 
 monly meek  and  calm  Mr.  Guthrie  of  Stirling  he 
 represents  as  a  kind  of  forward  flainini]^  fire-brand  ; 
 the  almost  too  peaceful  iMr.  Livingston  as  a  vio- 
 lent pusher  ;  the  pious  and  learned  IMr.  Simson 
 of  Airthas  an  arrant  fool;  holy  Rutherfoord,  and 
 uniting  Durham  and  Blair  as  working  the  ruin 
 of  the  church  ;  great  M*Ward  as  guilty  of  being 
 Rutherford's  servant ;  and  pious  Andrew  Gray 
 and  Hugh  Binning,  whose  sermons  the  Lord 
 then,  and  since,  hath  so  remarakably  blessed,  as 
 romantic, new-fashioned, and  unsubstantial  preach- 
 ers ;  and  in  short,  the  protestors'  settlements  of 
 ministers,  carriage  in  judicatories,  and  at  solemn 
 fasts,  and  sacramental  occasions,  which  were  at- 
 tended with  such  marvellous  powers  from  on  high, 
 as  a  scene  of  disorder,  pride,  and  selfishness. 
 
 But  the  more  their  brethren  reproached  and 
 persecuted  them  as  they  could,  the  more  the  Lord 
 countenanced  their  labours,  and  made  them  sing 
 as  in  the  days  of  their  youth,  about  1688  and 
 1049.  Remarkably  warned  of,  and  dreading 
 times  of  restraint,  they  were  exceedingly  diligent 
 in  their  ministrations,  and  these  were  attended 
 with  amazing  success.  JNIultitudes  of  the  most 
 serious  attended  their  many  sole m?i  fasts  and  their 
 sacramental  occasions;  and  so  marvellous  was  the 
 influence  they  felt,  that  they  were  often  in  a  kind 
 of  spiritual  tranre  the  whole  time.  After  one  sa- 
 cramental occasion,  about  sixty  of  the  aged  hear- 
 ers earnestly  applied  themselves  to  learn,  that 
 they  might  read  the  word  ol  God. — ''  1  have  been 
 many  years'  says  Mr.  Kirkton  in  his  iMS.  Me- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  299 
 
 moirs  **  in  a  parish,  where  I  never  heard  an  oath; 
 and  one  might  have  rode  many  miles  without 
 hearing  one.  In  a  great  part  of  the  country,  one 
 could  not  have  Iod»"ed  in  a  family,  where  God 
 was  not  daily  worshipped  by  reading,  signing  of 
 Psalms,  and  prayer.  People  were  generally  so 
 sober,  that  the  inn-keepers  complained  of  the 
 ruin  of  their  trade."  The  Lord  also  gave  them 
 peculiar  favour  in  the  sight  of  the  English  inva- 
 ders, who  relished  their  unfavourable  apprehen- 
 sions of  King  Charles,  and  his  malignants,  Pre- 
 latists,  and  Papists — and  repeatedly  offered  them 
 the  government  of  the  country,  which  they  al- 
 ways refused.  And  indeed  none  were  more  zea- 
 lous against  compliance  withCromwel  and  his  sec- 
 taries, or  for  continued  praying  for  Charles,  than 
 Lord  Warriston,  Mr.  James  Guthry,  and  other 
 principal  men  among  the  protestors.  Even  Ar- 
 gyle  fell  under  their  frown  for  some  involuntary 
 compliances  that  he  had  made. 
 
 The  English  had  the  whole  civil  government 
 of  the  nation  in  their  hands.  No  newly  plac- 
 ed minister  could  plead  in  law  for  his  stipend 
 without  a  warrant  from  some  of  their  judges. 
 The  English  Parliament  even  gave  their  judges 
 and  sequestrators  a  power  to  put  out  scandalous 
 ministers  or  teachers  in  universities,  and  prohi- 
 bited ministers'  public  praying  for  Charles,  as 
 their  King,  under  pain  of  losing  their  stipend. 
 This  both  protestors  and  resolutioners  refused  to 
 comply  with;  and  such  was  their  zeal  for  their 
 wicked  and  treacherous  Prince,  that  the  Lord's 
 Supper  was  not  dispensed  for  some  years  in  Edin- 
 burgh and  several  other  places,  because  they 
 scrupled  to  admit  the  magistrates  to  it,  who  had 
 been  obliged  to  crouch  under  the  English  con- 
 
300  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 querors.  By  means  of  Durham,  Blair,  and  some 
 other  pacificators,  the  protestors  and  resolutio- 
 ners  had  several  conferences  in  order  to  atrree- 
 nient  in  Mi.3.5;  and  the  matter  uas  carried  up  be- 
 fore (!!romwel,  who  ha<l  usurped  the  government 
 of  Britain  ;  hut  without  any  effect.  Wearied  of 
 the  scrupulo>ity  of"  the  protestors,  and  courted 
 with  hirf^^e  offers  hy  Sharp,  afterward  archbish- 
 shop,  in  name  of  the  resohitioners,  he  gave  both 
 parties  an  e(pial  liberty.  As  he  indulged  the  sec- 
 taries, which  abounded  in  his  time,  with  liberiy 
 to  spread  their  [)rinciples,and  to  restrain  the  Pres- 
 byterians from  foisting  into  their  causes  of  fasting 
 any  thing  in  favours  of  Charles  or  against  him- 
 self or  his  government,  had  taken  the  power  of 
 appointing  general  fasts,  and  fixing  the  causes 
 thereof  next  to  wholly  into  his  own  hands — Ru- 
 therford and  sixteen  other  protestors,  in  the  coun- 
 ties of  Fife  and  IVrth,  emitted  a  solemn  testimony 
 against  these  things,  and  in  behalf  of  their  cove- 
 nanted reformation. 
 
 During  the  confusions  which  happened  after 
 Cromwel's  death  in  16.58,  both  protesters  and 
 lesolutioners  aj)peared  pretty  calm,  and  agreed 
 to  bury  their  differences. — Instigated  by  Messrs. 
 Robert  Douglas,  and  James  Sharp,  iNFonk,  who 
 liad  commanded  the  English  forces  in  Scotland 
 f(u-  several  years,  undertook  to  restore  Charles  to 
 his  throne,  and,  by  the  vilest  perjury  and  trea- 
 chery, got  it  accomplished.  Charles  himself  was 
 wearied  of  his  miserable  and  pinched  circumstan- 
 ces abroad,  and  stuck  at  no  dissimulation  by  let- 
 ters, to  persuade  the  nation  of  his  virtues  and 
 good  intentions  'I'he  no!)les  at  home  disdained 
 cTouchini:  to  luiglishmen  (»f  no  rank  in  the  world. 
 The  Mibjects  in  general  were  tired  of  an  unset- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  301 
 
 tied  government.  Such  as  thought  they  had  serv- 
 ed Charles,  though  but  in  pillaging  their  neigh- 
 bour's houses,  expected  that  he  would  richly  re- 
 ward  them  :  his  friends  in  general  highly  extolled 
 his  excellencies.  And  thovigh,  in  his  travels,  he 
 had  solemnly  professed  himself  a  Papist,  some 
 divines  represented  him  as  the  great  instrument 
 by  which  God  would  fulfil  the  promises  of  Anti- 
 christ's destruction.  Sharp,  whom  the  resolution- 
 ers  chose  for  their  agent  to  concert  matters  with 
 General  Monk  and  Charles,  and  to  take  care 
 that  no  injury  might  be  done  to  their  church, 
 notwitlistanding  his  most  solemn  professions  of 
 sincerity,  betrayed  them,  and  concerted  with 
 Charles  how  to  introduce  Episcopacy,  in  reward 
 of  which  Charles  gave  him  twenty  chalders  of 
 corn,  and  the  archbishoprick  of  St.  x\ndrew's; 
 and,  in  the  mean  time,  stirred  them  up  against 
 the  protestors,  whom  he  represented  as  abhorred 
 by  his  Majesty  ;  so  that  it  is  hard  to  say  if  the 
 Prelatic  persecution  made  their  circumstances  a 
 whit  worse  than  the  resoiutioners  would  have 
 made  them. 
 
 Convinced  that  the  protestors  would  oppose 
 their  introduction  of  Prelacy,  Charles  and  Sharp 
 heartily  agreed  to  ruin  the  principal  of  them  as 
 quickly  as  possible.  Charles  therefore  gave  or- 
 ders to  imprison  the  Marquis  of  Argyle,  Lord 
 Warriston,  Sir  James  Stewart,  provost  of  Edin- 
 burgh, and  Sir  John  Chiesly,  who  shewed  the 
 most  bold  opposition  to  the  beheading  of  his  fa- 
 ther ;  while  he  advanced  to  honour  Sir  John 
 Fletcher,  who  had,  among  the  first,  abjured  him- 
 self, and  Middleton  and  Sharp,  who  had  shewed 
 not  a  little  forwardness  in  taking  the  engagement 
 of  fidelity  to  the  English  commonwealth. — Some- 
 
302  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 time  after,  a  sole mn  thanksgiving  for  Cliarles's 
 restoration,  at  Ktlinf)uri;li,  the  afternoon  of  which 
 was  spent  in  honiil  dmnkenness,  dehauchery,  and 
 madness — tbeCommittee  of  Estates  appointed  by 
 the  Parliament  in  lf).31,  all  the  members  of  which 
 had  conciuTcd  with  their  Sovereign  in  taking 
 the  national  covenant  and  solemn  league,  and  some 
 of  them  had  advised  him  to  make  that  solemn  de- 
 daralion  at  Dunfermline,  August  1 C,  16.30,  met 
 on  the  2d  of  August  16G0. — Finding  that  the  re- 
 solutioners  would  neither  join  with  their  protest- 
 ing brethren  to  form  a  supplication  to  his  Majes- 
 ty, nor  form  one  Ijy  themselves,  Mr.  James  Guth- 
 ry,  and  nine  other  ministers,  and  two  elders, 
 met  in  a  private  bouse  in  Edinburgh,  to  form  a 
 draught  of  a  supplication  to  be  laid  before  a  larger 
 meeting  of  their  brethren,  particularly  the  synod 
 of  (rlasgow.  In  this  draught,  they  represented 
 to  his  Majesty,  how  hateful  the  procedure  of  the 
 late  usurpers  had  been  to  them,  in  offering  vio- 
 lence to  the  Parliament  of  England,  in  murder- 
 ing his  royal  father,  and  in  secluding  himself 
 from  his  government,  and  in  their  impious  en- 
 croachments upon  the  kingdom  of  Jesus  Christ, 
 &c. — how  thankfully  they  acknowledged  the 
 Lord's  signal  preservation  of  his  Majesty's  per- 
 son, and  in  restoring  him  to  his  throne  ; — how 
 they  did,  and  resolved  to  pour  forth  their  fervent 
 sup[)lications  to  God  for  him ;  and  hoped,  that 
 he  would  protect,  countenance,  and  encourage 
 them  as  their  gracious  Sovereign — what  dangers 
 threatened  religion  and  the  work  of  reformation 
 in  these  kingdoms,  from  the  unremitted  endea- 
 vours of  Papists,  Prelatists,  and  malignants  on 
 the  one  hand,  and  of  the  sectaries  on  the  other; 
 and  therefore  humbly   besought  his  Majesty  t(^ 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  803 
 
 employ  his  royal  power  for  the  preservation  of 
 the  reformed  religion,  in  doctrine,  worship,  disci- 
 pline and  government  in  the  church  of  Scotland ; 
 and  for  the  reformation  of  religion  in  England 
 and  Ireland  ; — and  that  all  places  of  trust  might 
 be  filled  with  such  as  have  taken  the  covenant, 
 and  are  of  approved  integrity  and  known  affec- 
 tion to  the  cause  of  God ; — and  that  his  Majesty 
 would  remove  the  ceremonies  and  service  hook  from 
 his  church  and  family,  and  from  other  places  of 
 his  dominions,  and  publicly  signify  his  approba- 
 tion of  the  covenant,  into  which  he  had  so  solemn- 
 ly entered,  and  of  his  purpose  to  adhere  to  it — as 
 it  was  the  desire  of  their  soul,  that  he  might  be 
 like  David,  a  man  according  to  God's  own  heart, 
 and  to  Solomon,  of  an  understanding  heart  to 
 judge  the  Lord's  people,  &:c.  The  committee, 
 hearing  of  their  meeting,  caused  apprehend  them 
 all,  except  one  elder  that  escaped,  and  without 
 hearing  them,  imprisoned  them  in  the  castle  of 
 Edinburgh,  from  whence  the  Parliament  next 
 year  liberated  them  all,  except  Mr.Guthry.  Next 
 day  the  committee  emitted  a  proclamation  against 
 all  unlawful  m.eetings,  without  his  Majesty's  spe- 
 cial authority,  and  against  all  seditious  petitions 
 and  remonstrances,  as  every  faithful  one  was  now 
 called. 
 
 By  a  flattering  letter  directed  from  Charles  to 
 the  resolutioners  of  the  Presbytery  of  Edinburgh, 
 in  which  he  promised  to  support  their  cause,  and 
 maintain  their  religion  as  by  law  established ; — 
 by  a  proclamation  against  Rutherford's  Lex  rex, 
 and  the  causes  of  God's  wrath,  as  containing  many 
 things  injurious  to  his  Majesty,  and  laying  the 
 foundation  and  seeds  of  rebellion,  and  the  burn- 
 ing of  what  copies  they  could  find,  at  Edinburgh, 
 
304f  A  COMPENDIOUS    HISTORY  OK  THE 
 
 by  the  hane^man; — and  by  a  proclamation  against 
 rciiiimslrants  and  their  ddhcroits; — and  hy  tlie  con- 
 finement or  "nnprisonment  of  some  i^entlemen  or 
 ministers,  that  tfiey  mii^ht  have  no  infhience  uj)- 
 on  the  eh'ctions  (or  the  ensiiinn^  Parliament,  or 
 citint^;-  them  to  it  as  criminals — prepaiations  was 
 made  for  its  hein^  wiiolly  comj)hiisant.  Great 
 rare  was  taken  that  none  should  be  elected  coin- 
 iiiissioners,  hut  such  as  should  in  all  thinirs  he 
 subservient  to  the  will  of  the  court.  For  this 
 reason,  it  seems  none  else  could  be  found  fit  in  the 
 biMi^h  of"  Lanark,  but  their  jyiper.  And  care  was 
 takin  to  have  the  elections  of  those  that  were 
 otherwise  disj)osed  set  aside.  The  most  part  of 
 the  members  were  absolutely  infamous,  who  wal- 
 lowed in  profaneness,  whoredom,  and  drunken- 
 ness. Only  Loudon,  Cassilis,  Sutherland,  Craw- 
 ford, Horthwick,  Torphichen,  and  a  few  other 
 old  convenanters,  who  often  dissented  from  the 
 deeds  of  the  rest,  retained  their  wonted  sobriety. 
 And  indeed,  drunkenness,  whoredom,  cursing, 
 and  blasphemy,  were  now  reckoned  badges  of 
 loyalty  ;  and  piety,  or  even  common  gravity,  a 
 mark  of  rebellion.  Charles  himself  appears  to 
 have  been  a  [)rofligate  atheist,  abandoned  to  pro- 
 fane swearing,  drunkenness,  and  whoredom,  and 
 ca[)able  of  the  most  base  dissimulation.  Sharp, 
 his  director  and  agent,  was  chiefly  remarkable 
 for  activity,  craft,  and  dissimulation.  Such  as 
 were  intimately  ac(pjainte(l  with  him  reckoned 
 him  a  downright  atheist,  who  affected  to  believe 
 that  there  was  neither  God,  heaven,  nor  hell;  he 
 used  no  private  prayer,  and  scarcely  had  prayer 
 in  his  family  once  a-month;  he  lived,  who  knows 
 how  long,  in  whoredom  with  one  Isabel  Lindsay, 
 and,  with  his  own  hand^  strangletl  the  child  which 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  305 
 
 she  bare  to  him.  And  there  is  not  a  little  ground 
 to  believe,  that  he  had  entered  into  a  solemn 
 compact  with  the  devil,  in  order  to  preserve  his 
 life  and  carry  on  his  designs. 
 
 The  Parliament  having  met  on  the  2 1st  of 
 January,  1661,  after  a  faithful  sermon  from 
 Mr.  Robert  Douglas,  would  choose  their  after 
 preachers  for  themselves ;  who,  by  their  fulsome 
 harangues,  excited  them  to  render  his  Majesty  ab- 
 solute, and  to  establish  some  greater  authority 
 in  the  church  to  keep  her  ministers  in  order. 
 Highly  pleased  with  such  stuff,  the  Parliament 
 appointed  a  new  oath  of  allegiance^  acknowleding 
 the  King's  supremacy  over  all  persons,  and  in  all 
 causes.  They  enacted.  That  no  conventions, 
 leagues,  or  bonds,  should  be  made  without  his 
 Majesty's  consent,  and  prohibited  the  renew- 
 ing of  the  solemn  league  and  covenant,  or  any 
 other  covenants  or  public  oaths  concerning  the 
 government  of  the  church  or  kingdom,  without 
 his  special  warrant  and  approbation;  and  appoint- 
 ed all  persons  in  public  offices  to  swear  the  oath 
 of  allegiance  or  supremacy  before  mentioned,  and 
 subscribe  the  declaration  asserting  his  Majesty's 
 prerogative ;  bearing,  that  it  was  his  and  his  suc- 
 cessors' sole  right,  to  choose  and  appoint  officers 
 of  state,  privy  counsellors,  and  lords  of  session; — 
 and  to  call,  hold,  and  dissolve  all  Parliaments 
 and  other  conventions  of  the  states  ;  that  no  acts 
 of  Parliament  are  binding  without  his  special  ap- 
 probation or  commission;  that  the  power  of  mak- 
 ing peace  or  war  doth  only  reside  in  him,  and 
 his  heirs  and  successors ;  that  it  is  high  treason 
 for  any  subjects  to  rise  or  continue  in  arms 
 without  his  authority,  or  to  meet  for  determining 
 any  matters,   civil   or  ecclesiastical,   except  in 
 
 2  R 
 
306  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OP  THE 
 
 the  ordinary  jude^mcnts,  or  to  make  leagues  and 
 Ijonds,   witliout  his  s])ecial  consent;    that  the  so- 
 lemn league  and  covenant,  and  all  treaties  fullow- 
 in^  upon  it,   are  7iot  obli<ratory  upon   any  of  the 
 subjects  of  this   kinf:^dom  ;  and  that  none  could 
 hiw  fully  recjuire  the  renewing  of  said  covenant, 
 or  any  other  covenant,  or  renew  the  same,  with- 
 out hisiMajesty's  s])eeial  warrant  and  approbation: 
 Tliey  declared  the  Convention  of  Estates  164^3, 
 which  enjoined  the  solemn  league  and  covenant, 
 and  all  the  Parliaments   between  1640  and  1649 
 inclusively,  i^ozV/and  nuUm  their  very  constitution, 
 and  so  their  deeds  of  no  authority.    They  declar- 
 ed, that  the  Protestant  religion  was  settled  as  be- 
 fore 16;<8,   and    the   government    of  the  church 
 should  J)e  secured  as  his  Majesty  found  most  pro- 
 per.  They  appointed  the  '^9th  of  jMay  to  be  kept 
 as  a  ycarli/  thaiik.s^ivin<j;  to  God  ;  and  by  the  pre- 
 amble of  this  act,  they  laboured  to  bring  in  God 
 and  all  the  subjects  as   approvers  of  their  fore- 
 mtntiont'd  acts,  and  as  solemn  reproachers  of  the 
 "IV hole  covenanted  work   of  reformation.    And,  in 
 fine,   they  restored  Patronages,  and  required  all 
 presentees  to    take   the   above  oath  of  allegiance 
 and  declaration,    1'he  Parliament  confirmed  their 
 statutes  w  ith  the  blood  of  the  Marquis  ot  Argylc, 
 whose  estate  Middleton  the   president  expected, 
 and  of  Mr.  James  Guthry,  and  with  the  harrass- 
 luent,  imprisonment,  or  banishment  of  his  tellow 
 prtitiornrs,  and  other  protestors; — most  of  whom 
 bad  suffered  for  their  attachment  to  his  Majesty, 
 during  Gromwel's  usurpation.     Had  not  God  re- 
 moved Rutherford  by  a  triumphant  death,  he  had 
 al.Mi   been    sacrificed.      Meanwhile,   by  the  influ- 
 eud'  of  the  resolutioners,  and  by  the  court's  dis- 
 solution of  synods,  and  by  the  general  fainting 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  307 
 
 of  ministers,  or  their  divisions  among  themselves, 
 not  one  judicial  testimony  was  lifted  up  against 
 the  wickedness  of  the  Parliament  in  Scotland. 
 
 After  the  rise  of  the  Parliament,  Charles,  in- 
 stigated by  Middleton  and  Sharp,  and  assured 
 that  the  best  part  of  the  nation  earnestly  wish- 
 ed it,  and  that  not  so  much  as  twenty  of  the  re- 
 solutioners  would  oppose  it, — by  a  proclamation, 
 founded  on  his  newly  established  supremacy, — 
 established  Episcopalian  government.  Sharp  was 
 made  archbishop  of  St.  Andrew's,  and  Fairfoul 
 of  Glasgow,  under  whom  twelve  others  Vvere 
 made  bishops.  None  of  them  had  the  least  ap- 
 pearance of  seriousness,  except  Leighton  of  Dum- 
 blain.  Meanwhile  the  Earl  of  Tweeddale  was  im- 
 prisoned for  some  words  he  had  spoken  in  favours 
 of  Mr.  Guthry,  and  his  not  voting  for  his  death. 
 The  privy  council  emitted  a  proclamation,  pro- 
 hibiting the  election  of  any  for  magistrates  or 
 counsellors  in  burghs,  that  were  not  hearty  for 
 bishops  and  the  king's  arbitrary  power.  And  to 
 prevent  the  printing  or  spread  of  such  scandalous 
 and  seditious  papers,  as  Argyle's  and  Guthry's 
 dying  words,  the  Covenanters'  Plca^  &zc.  they  pro- 
 hibited the  printing  of  any  books  or  papers,  with- 
 out warrant  from  the  king  or  Parliament.  They 
 soon  after  prohibited  all  ecclesiastical  meetings 
 in  Synods,  Presbyteries,  and  sessions,  till  author- 
 ised by  the  archbishop  and  bishops.  Presbyteries 
 were  prohibited  to  ordain  ministers ;  and  if 
 they  but  begged  leave  to  represent  their  griev- 
 ances, it  was  held  seditious  or  treasonable.  Lord 
 Loudon,  and  soon  after  Mr.  Bailie,  died  of  grief, 
 for  the  alterations  they  saw  made  in  both  church 
 and  state.  Messrs.  Dickson,  Douglas,  and  Wood, 
 too  late,  became  sensible  of  their  mistake  in  sup- 
 
.•^08  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THR 
 
 porting  the  puJdk  resolutions^  while  others  were 
 fretted  to  see  the  pre-apprehensions  of  the  pro- 
 testors so  fearfully  verified,  and  to  hear  tlitm- 
 selves  blamed  by  them  for  bringing  matters  to 
 this  dreadful  coiulitiun. 
 
 The  Parliament  meeting  on  May  8,  1G62,  ad- 
 mitted the  newly  consecrated  bishops  to  their 
 seats  with  great  pomp  and  ceremony  ;  and  then 
 re-establishi'd  the  government  of  the  church  by 
 archbishops  and  bishops,  as  founded  upon  his  iMa- 
 jesty's  inherent  supremacy  over  the  church  ; — 
 declared  it  high  treason  for  subjects,  on  any  pre- 
 tence, to  enter  into  leagues  or  covenants,  or  take 
 np  arms  against  the  king  or  any  commissioned 
 by  him  ;  and  that  the  national  covenant,  as  ex- 
 plained in  1688,  and  the  solemn  league  and  cove- 
 nant  were  unlawful  oaths,  no  way  binding  on  such 
 as  had  sworn  them  ; — and  repealed  all  acts  civil 
 and  ecclesiastical  aj)proving  these  covenants  ; 
 particularly  the  seditious  meeting  of  the  Assem- 
 bly at  (rlasgow  in  KiSS,  and  all  the  acts  and 
 d"eeds  thereof;  and  declared,  that  if  any  spoke, 
 Avrote,  printed,  or  prayed  against  his  majesty's 
 supremacy  over  the  church,  or  against  the  Epis- 
 copalian government  now  estal)lished,  he  shuuld 
 be  incapable  of  any  public  trust.  They  next  ap- 
 pointed all  those  ministers,  who  had  been  ordain- 
 ed since  10  69,  many  of  wiiom  had  suffered  much 
 for  their  attachment  to  Charles,  under  Cromwel, 
 to  get  presentations  from  their  patrons,  and  re- 
 nouncing their  former  ordination,  to  receive  ad- 
 mission from  their  bisho[)s  ;  and  that  all  minis- 
 ters, under  severe  penalties,  should  attend  their 
 bisliop's  Synod,  and  assist  him  in  all  things  he 
 recpiirctl  ;  and  that  all  masters  of  colleges,  who 
 did  not  submit  to  Prelacy^  should  be  turned  out. 
 
CHURCH  OF    SCOTLAND.  309 
 
 and  none  be  allowed  to  preach,  keep  schools,  or 
 teach  children  of  quality,  without  the  bishop's  li- 
 cence. They  further  appointed  all  persons  in 
 public  trust,  to  subscribe  a  second  declaration, 
 bearing.  That  they  judged  it  unlawful,  upon 
 any  pretence,  to  enter  into  leagues  or  cove- 
 nants ;  or  to  take  up  arms  against  the  king,  or 
 those  commissioned  by  him ;  and  that  all  the 
 convocations,  petitions,  and  protestations  for  be- 
 ginning and  carrying  on  the  late  troubles,  {i.  e, 
 covenanted  reformation,  between  1637  and  1651) 
 were  unlawful  and  seditious,  and  particularly 
 that  the  jiaiional  covenant,  as  sworn  and  explain- 
 ed in  1 QSS,  and  the  solemn  league  and  covenant, 
 were,  and  are,  in  themselv^es  unlawful  oaths,  and 
 imposed  upon  the  subjects  contrary  to  the  funda- 
 mental laws  and  liberties  of  the  kingdom,  and 
 no  way  hind  any  that  swore  them,  to  endeavour 
 any  alteration  of  the  present  government  of  either 
 church  or  state.  After  the  act  of  indemnity  had 
 been  so  long  delayed,  in  order  to  terrify  people 
 into  compliance,  it  was  now  passed,  with  an  ex- 
 ception of  about  800  persons,  some  of  whom  were 
 dead,  and  others  were  infants,  or  had  never  ex- 
 isted, on  whom  was  laid  a  fine,  of  about  L. 85,000 
 Sterling,  which  Middleton  hoped  to  get  for  him- 
 self:  and  besides,  twelve  persons  were,  by  bal- 
 lotting,  to  be  excluded  from  all  places  of  power 
 
 and  trust. They  also  issued  a  proclamation, 
 
 bearing.  That  all  ministers,  who  did  not  observe 
 the  anniversary  thanksgiving,  on  the  29th  of  May, 
 should  he  deprived  of  their  benefices. To  tes- 
 tify their  loyalty,  the  magistrates  of  Linlithgow, 
 with  great  parade,  burnt  the  covenants,  which 
 themselves  had  sworn,  along  witii  Lex  rex,  and 
 the  causes  of  God's  wrath,  ike. 
 
310  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OP  THE 
 
 A  number  of  ministers  had  been  summoned 
 to  the  Parliament  for  a  terror  to  others,  that 
 mi^ht  incline  tu  adhere  to  their  old  principles. 
 The  day  after  the  Parliament  rose,  the  privy 
 council  met,  and  appninted  all  parsons,  vicars, 
 and  ministers,  to  attend  uj)on  their  diocesan  Sy- 
 nods, the  diets  of  which  were  then  appointed  by 
 the  bishops  and  archbishops.  To  enforce  this 
 act,  and  put  honour  on  the  bishops,  Middicton 
 the  commissioner,  and  Glencairn  the  chancellor, 
 with  the  Earls  of  Morton,  Linlithgow,  and  Cal- 
 lender,  and  Lord  Napier,  took  a  tour  to  the  west 
 of  Scotland,  where,  in  their  different  lodging 
 places,  they  wallowed  in  drunkenness,  gluttony, 
 and  profaneness,  and  at  Ai/r,  about  midnight, 
 drank  the  dcrirs  health  at  the  cross.  In  conse- 
 quence of  the  archbishop's  complaint,  That  none 
 of  the  ministers  ordained  since  164-9  had  owned 
 him  for  bishop;  and  that  he  and  his  fellow  bi- 
 shops would  be  mere  cyphers  or  objects  of  hatred, 
 unless  more  effectual  methods  were  taken  to  en- 
 I'orce  submission  to  them,  the  council  met  at  Glas- 
 gow, October  1st :  and  while  most  of  the  mem- 
 bers were  mortally  drunk,  enacted,  that  all  such 
 ministers  as  did  not,  before  the  end  of  that  month, 
 apply  to  their  bishops  for  collation  and  admission, 
 should  be  deprived  of  their  stipends  for  the  pre- 
 sent year,  and  removed  from  their  parishes  and 
 Presbyteries  ;  and  never  after  exercise  any  part 
 of  their  ministerial  office  ;  and  that  such  of  their 
 parishioners  as  afterwards  repaired  to  their  ser- 
 mons, should  be  punisheil  as  frequenters  of  con^ 
 venticles.  As  several  of  i\\e  ministers  had  retired 
 from  the  country  to  Ldinbnrgh,  the  council  re- 
 quired the  magistrates  to  oblige  all  the  inhabi- 
 tants every  evening  to  give  an  account  of  all  their 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  SI  1 
 
 lodgers,  under  what  penalties  should  be  thought 
 proper.  They  appointed  all  the  ministers  of 
 Edinburgh,  who  did  not  comply  with  Prelacy, 
 to  desist  from  exercising  their  ministry,  and  leave 
 the  city  before  Martinmas  next :  and  commenced 
 a  process  against  Sir  James  Stewart  the  provost, 
 and  his  son,  for  entertaining  Mr.  Hugh  M-Kail, 
 and  against  Messrs.  Donald  Cargil,  John  Brown, 
 and  John  Livingston,  and  sixteen  other  ministers, 
 in  order  to  force  them  to  comply  with  the  bishops, 
 or  banish  them  from  the  kingdom.  By  such 
 means,  above  three  hundred  ministers,  generally 
 of  remarkable  piety,  gifts,  and  diligence,  and 
 most  of  them  great  sufferers  for  their  attachment 
 to  Charles,  during  the  usurpation,  were  driven 
 from  their  charges,  and  their  places  filled  with 
 men  shamefully  ignorant,  many  of  them  a  scan- 
 dal to  human  nature  in  vice,  and  others  of  them 
 of  the  most  violent  and  persecuting  tempers  ;  and 
 all  of  them,  by  the  bishops  and  their  assistants, 
 forcibly  intruded  upon  congregations  :  No  won- 
 der then,  that  such  as  had  any  regard  to  the  laws 
 of  Christ  scrupled  to  hear  them,  and  resorted  to 
 such  opposers  of  Prelacy  as  were  not  yet  cast 
 out,  or  to  the  family  worship  of  the  ejected  mi- 
 nisters,  in  such  numbers,  that  the  houses  could 
 not  contain  them  ;  from  which  field  meetings 
 gradually  originated. 
 
 After  Middleton  had  established  Prelacy,  he 
 himself  was  disgraced  ;  and  soon  after  died  mi- 
 serably at  Tangier,  killed,  according  to  his  for- 
 mer imprecation,  by  the  broken  bone  of  that  arm, 
 which  he  had  held  up,  in  swearing  the  covenant ; 
 and  Lauderdale  his  opponent  became  prime  mi- 
 nister in  his  stead.  After  the  council  had  com^ 
 menced  further  processes  against  forty  more  mi- 
 
312  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 nisters  in  Galloway,  and  the  diocese  of  Dunkeld, 
 and  given  orders  to  Sir  James  Turner,  a  savage 
 commander  of  the  military,  to  suppress  all  pri- 
 vate religious  meetings  for  instruction,  prayer,  or 
 conference,  the  Parliament  met  June  18,  \66S, 
 and  enacted.  That  all  non-conform  ministers 
 that  shall  presume  to  exercise  their  office  in  any 
 manner,  shall  be  punished  as  seditious  persons; 
 and  all  with-drawers  from  the  conform  incum- 
 bents of  their  own  parish,  be  punished, — every 
 nobleman,  gentleman,  or  heritor,  in  the  fourth 
 part  of  his  yearly  revenue,  every  yeoman  or  ten- 
 ant, in  about  the  fourth  part  of  his  moveables 
 after  his  rent  is  paid;  and  every  burgess,  with  the 
 loss  of  his  freedom,  and  the  fourth  part  of  his 
 moveables,  together  with  such  corporal  punish- 
 ment as  the  council  find  proper :  They  appoint- 
 ed all  persons  in  public  trust,  to  subscribe  the  de- 
 claration of  last  year;  and  that  if  any  elected 
 to  be  counsellors  or  magistrates  in  burghs,  refus- 
 ed to  sign  it,  they  should  be  for  ever  incapable 
 of  being  magistrates  or  of  merchandizing.  They 
 appointed  a  national  Synod  of  bishops,  &:c.  but 
 which  could  enact  nothing  that  the  king  or  his 
 commissioner  was  unwilling  to  confirm  ; — and 
 which  indeed  never  met.  They  ordered  a  levy 
 of  20,000  foot,  and  2000  horse,  to  be  ready  to 
 serve  his  Majesty  in  any  part  of  his  dominions, 
 
 as  he  should  find  necessary. Lord  Warriston, 
 
 whom  Charles's  physician  had  attempted  to 
 poison  at  Hamburgh,  and  then  taken  from  him 
 sixty  ounces  of  blood,  being  apprehended  in 
 France,  was,  notwithstanding  his  weakness  of  bo- 
 dy and  mind  produced  by  the  poison  and  loss  of 
 blood,  sentenced  to  death,  and  his  head  to  be  fixed 
 on  the  Netherbow  port,  along  with  Mr.  Guthry's, 
 
 (i 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  313 
 
 The  privy  council  commenced  a  prosecution 
 
 against  sixteen  ministers  for  continuing  to  exer- 
 cise their  office,  and  against  William  Gordon  of 
 Earlstoun,  for  refusing"  to  hear  the  curate  of  his 
 parish  ;  and  emitted  a  proclamation,  That  all  mi- 
 nisters that  did  not  duly  attend  the  bishops' 
 courts,  should,  within  twenty  days,  remove  them- 
 selves, families,  and  substance,  out  of  their  re- 
 spective parishes,  and  not  reside  within  twenty 
 miles  of  the  same,  nor  within  six  miles  of  any 
 cathedral  church,  or  three  miles  of  any  royal 
 burgh  ; — and  enacted,  That  all  persons  who  shall 
 come  from  Ireland  without  sufficient  testimo- 
 nials, and  do  not  return  within  fifteen  days, 
 shall  be  imprisoned,  and  treated  as  seditious  ; 
 — and  that  all  persons  that,  notwithstanding 
 three  admonitions  given  by  their  minister,  with- 
 draw from  public  worship,  shall  upon  his  attes- 
 tation, be  prosecuted  according  to  law  ;  and  that 
 all  noblemen,  sheriffs,  and  officers  of  the  army, 
 shall  assist  ministers  in  their  prosecution. — In 
 consequence  of  this,  the  curates  in  the  west  and 
 south,  after  sermon,  called  over  the  roll  of  their 
 parishes,  and  delated  whomsoever  they  pleased 
 of  the  absents  to  Sir  James  Turner,  the  profli- 
 gate and  barbarous  commander  of  the  forces  in 
 that  country  ;  who,  together  with  his  soldiers, 
 judged  and  punished  them  as  they  thought  fit ; 
 and,  by  this  means,  and  by  raising  the  fines  im- 
 posed by  IMiddleton's  Parliament,  plundered  and 
 ruined  the  country. 
 
 By  Bishop  Sharp's  instigation,  Charles  appoint- 
 ed a ///i;'^  Co  w/zimzo/i  court  in  1661,  consisting 
 o[  nine  bishops,  and  thirty- five  laymen,  and  of 
 which  one  bishop  and  four  others  were  ^quorum, 
 J]aving  power  to  prosecute,  suspend,  and  depose 
 
 2  s 
 
Sli>  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 ministers,  and  to  fine,  imprison,  &c.  them  and 
 others,  who  continued  in  tlieir  non-conformity  to 
 the  religion  estahlished  by  law  ;  and  appointed 
 the  officers  of  the  army  or  militia,  and  lords  of 
 j)rivy  council  to  assist  them,  in  apprehending  and 
 punishing  of  such  delinquents.  In  consequence 
 whereof,  persons  were  called  before  them  with- 
 out information,  accusation,  or  witness;  and  re- 
 quired to  answer  whatever  questions  were  pro- 
 ])Osed.  If  any  offered  any  legal  defence,  he  was 
 rc(|uired  to  take  the  oath  of  supreniacij^  the  refu- 
 sal of  which  was  reckoned  sufficient  guilt.  They, 
 in  the  manner  of  the  Spanish  inquisition,  and  the 
 privy  council,  in  their  wonted  manner,  proceeded 
 to  ruin  every  serious  opposer.  Such  non-conform 
 ministers,  as  yet  remained  in  their  charges  by  the 
 favour  of  some  of  the  nobility,  or  the  like,  were 
 driven  from  them,  and  soldiers  were  appointed  to 
 force  people  who  absented  from  the  sermons  of 
 their  intruded  curates,  to  pay  twentypence  for 
 every  time  they  should  be  absent.  Besides  seve- 
 ral proclamations  for  enforcing  or  executing  the 
 above  mentioned  acts  of  Parliament  against  non- 
 conformists and  preachers,  or  attenders  upon  re- 
 ligious meetings  not  allowed  by  law,  they  emit- 
 ted one  against  Brown's  apohgetical  relation  of  the 
 suj/'erings  oj'ihcjaitlful  ministers  and  professors  of 
 that  period,  and  ordered  it  to  be  burnt  in  the  street 
 of  Edinburgh  by  the  hangman  ;  and  all  that  had 
 copies  of  it  to  deliver  them  up  to  their  sheriffs, 
 or  be  liable  to  a  fine  of  L.2000  Scots :  and  iNIr. 
 James  Guthrie's  widow  and  daughter  were  pro- 
 secuted for  having  it. 
 
 In  IGGG,  the  remains  of  the  fines  imposed  by 
 the  Parliament  of  1G(>2,  Ibr  some  trifling  conq)li- 
 ances  with  the  Knglish  usurpers,  or  the  like,  were 
 exacted  with  rigour  by  the   King's  troops,,  who 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  315 
 
 took  free  quarters  till  they  j^ot  them :  no  excuse 
 was  accepted,  unless  by  taking  the  oath  of  supre- 
 macy, and  subscribing  the  declaration  ;  and  such 
 as  could  neither  pay  their  fines,  nor  entertain  the 
 troops,  were  dragged  to  prison.  Sir  James  Tur- 
 ner and  his  soldiers  were  empowered  to  fine  the 
 west  country  people  for  non-attendance  on  the 
 ministrations  of  their  profligate  curates,  and  even 
 to  fine  gentlemen,  if  their  ladies  or  servants  did 
 not  attend ;  and  to  quarter  on  tenants,  if  their 
 landlords  withdrew.  No  widowhood  or  poverty 
 excused  from  the  fines.  The  soldiers  snatched 
 the  meat  from  the  mouths  of  innocent  children, 
 and  gave  it  to  their  dogs;  and  when  they  had  con- 
 sumed all  their  provisions,  they  sold  or  burnt  the 
 furniture.  In  this  manner.  Turner  and  his 
 troops  levied  almost  L.60,000  Scots,  from  the 
 two  shires  of  Galloway  and  Dumfries  for  their 
 non-conformity. — Being  obliged  to  give  up  the 
 infamous  High  Commission^  two  regiments  of 
 foot,  and  six  troops  of  horse  were  raised,  under 
 General  Dalziel,  a  profligate  savage,  educated  in 
 the  military  service  of  Russia,  in  order  to  force 
 the  non-conformists  to  hear  the  curates:  the  coun- 
 cil emitted  a  proclamation,  requiring  masters  to 
 answer  for  the  conformity  of  their  servants,  and 
 heritors  for  that  of  their  tenants,  and  give  bond 
 accordingly,  under  pain  of  horning. 
 
 Sir  James  Turner,  though  it  is  said  he  scarce- 
 ly acted  up  to  his  orders,  had  almost  wholly  ruin- 
 ed the  south-west  of  Scotland,  and  obliged 
 multitudes  to  leave  their  houses,  and  wander 
 among  mosses  and  mountains.  Four  countrymen 
 in  Galloway,  being  informed  that  his  merciless 
 soldiers  had  apprehended  a  poor  old  man,  and 
 were  going  to  roast  him  naked  upon  a  red-hot 
 
.'5IG  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTOUY  OF  THE 
 
 ^riilircm,  went  and  bettered  tliem  to  let  him  alone: 
 but,  instead  of  hearkenini^  to  this  humane  desire, 
 the  soldiers  fell  u[jon  the  men,  who,  ^-ettinc^  the 
 better  of  theni,  disHinied  them,  and  relieved  their 
 friend  ;  and  fearin^^  that  tiie  other  soldiers  in  the 
 parish  would  fall  upon  them,  they,  and  seven  or 
 einht  more,  surprised  the  l)arty,  which  all  laid 
 down  their  arms,  except  one  that  was  killed. 
 'J'he  countrymen  about,  apprehending^  that  Tur- 
 ner would  cruelly  resent  what  had  been  done, 
 upon  them,  without  loss  of  time,  went  to  Dum- 
 fries and  surprised  liim,  and  disarmed  his  troops 
 without  hurtini^  any  of  them  but  one  that  was 
 wounded; — and  then,  at  the  cross,  publicly  drank 
 the  Kino's  health,  and  prosperity  to  his  govern- 
 ment. Informed  hereof,  the  council  published  a 
 proclamation,  which  could  not  reach  those  con- 
 cerned till  it  was  too  late,  requirin<^  them  to  lay 
 down  their  arms,  and  surrender  themselves  to  his 
 INIajesty's  Lieutenant-General,  or  some  other  of- 
 ficers, within  twenty- four  hours,  and  prohibiting 
 all  persons  to  assist,  harbour,  or  keep  any  corres- 
 pondence with  these  rebels,  but  containing  no 
 promise  of  indemnity  in  case  of  surrender.  Af- 
 ter some  deliberation,  that  persecuted  handful 
 formed  themselves  into  a  small  army,  and  re- 
 solved to  march  towards  Edinburgh,  in  order  to 
 give  their  persecuted  friends  an  opportunity  to 
 join  them;  and  at  Lanark,  being  about  1500, 
 they  renewed  their  solemn  covenant  with  God  ; 
 and,  about  the  same  time,  drew  u])  a  manifesto 
 nowise  disowning  his  IMajesty's  authority,  but 
 bearing,  that  they  had  taken  up  arms  to  defend 
 themselves  and  their  persecuted  brethren,  in  their 
 adherence  to  their  covenants,  into  which  the  King 
 himself  iiad  solemnly  entered,  and  to  protect  them- 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  517 
 
 jselves  and  friends  from  such  cruelty  and  violence 
 as  they  had  for  some  time  past  suffered.  As  Dal- 
 ziel,  with  Charles's  troops,  marched  up  towards 
 them,  they  marched  eastward,  byBathgate,  till  they 
 came  to  Collington,  about  thee  miles  from  Edin- 
 burgh. Greatly  diminished  by  their  fatigue,  in 
 marching  so  far,in  one  of  the  last  nights  of  Novem- 
 ber, and  disappointed  of  their  expected  assistance 
 from  the  Lothians,  they,  about  nine  hundred, 
 marched  by  the  east  end  of  Pentland  hills,  where, 
 while  they  were  quite  dispirited  and  fatigued,  and 
 expecting  a  peaceful  negotiation,  Dalziel,  contra- 
 ry to  his  promise  of  a  cessation  of  arms,  fell  upon 
 them,  and  killed  fifty  of  them,  and  took  as  many 
 prisoners.  But  the  country  people  in  the  neigh- 
 bourhood killed  and  took  prisoners  not  a  few 
 more.  Notwithstanding,  Charles  himself  was  so 
 ashamed  of  the  illegal  cruelties  proved  against 
 Sir  James  Turner,  that  he  dismissed  him  from 
 his  service,  yet  the  privy  council,  to  whom,  just 
 before  their  skirmish  at  Pentland,  the  poor  peo- 
 ple had  begged  leave  to  represent  their  grievances 
 for  two  or  three  years,  persecuted,  murdered,  im- 
 prisoned, forfeited,  or  banished  them  that  had  ta- 
 ken arms,  or  that  gave  them  any  harbour  or  lodg- 
 ing. And  such  as  got  an  indemnity,  had  it,  at 
 the  expense  of  wounding  their  conscience,  by  sub- 
 scribing what  they  called  the  bond  of  2-)eacc^  iw 
 which  they  engaged  for  themselves  and  these  un- 
 der them,  to  live  'peaceahli) ;  that  is,  to  l)ear  no 
 testimony  against  the  abominations  established 
 by  law. 
 
 As  the  nobles  were  wearied  of  persecuting  mi- 
 nisters and  people  merely  for  not  hearing  of  cu- 
 rates, many  of  them  shamefully  ignorant  or  pro- 
 fligate ;  and  as  it  was  expected  that  it  ivould  di- 
 
318  A  COMPENDTOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 vide  and  weaken  the  Presbyterian  party,  Charles, 
 moved  by  Tweedale,  by  a  letter  in  1G69,  grant- 
 ed an  iNDUf.GKNCK  to  them,  under  certain  condi- 
 tions, whi(  h,  through  the  opposition  of  the  bi- 
 sho})s  and  their  clergy,  had  no  small  difficulty  to 
 obtain  the  approbation  of  the  council.  In  conse- 
 quence of  this,  about  forty-three  Presbyterian 
 ministers  were  indulged  either  in  their  own  pa- 
 rishes when  vacant,  or  in  some  other  parish,  as 
 the  council  judged  meet.  Another  indulgence 
 was  granted  to  about  eighty,  in  1672,  to  keep 
 matters  quiet,while  Lewis  of  France,  andCharles, 
 his  pensionary,  laboured  to  destroy  the  Dutch  na- 
 tion, which  kindly  sheltered  their  persecuted  Pro- 
 testant brethren.  Some  few  of  the  persons,  to 
 whom  these  indulgences  were  offered,  refused  to 
 acce[)t  them.  Some  of  them  that  did  accept, 
 testified  against  the  conditions,  or  betook  them- 
 selves to  silly  shifts  to  quiet  their  conscience,  and 
 cover  their  shame;  while  a  considerable  number 
 boldly  pled  for  their  own  compliance,  and  raged 
 at  the  field  preachers,  who  testified  against  it.  It 
 was  })led  in  favours  of  it,  that  magistrates,  for 
 ends  known  to  themselves,  may  prohibit  mini- 
 sters to  preach  for  a  time,  and  afterward  permit 
 them  to  preach  ;  that  though  magistrates  have 
 not  power  to  silence  ministers  altogether,  yet  they 
 have  power  to  prohibit  the  public  exercise  of  their 
 ministry,  and  again,  when  they  think  fit,  to  grant 
 that  liberty  unto  them  ;  that  the  second  book  of 
 discipline  allows  magistrates  to  place  ministers, 
 when  the  kirk  isrorru})ted,  and  all  things  are  out  of 
 order;  that  Kings  Hezekiah  and  Josiah  reformed 
 the  Levites,  purged  the  temple,  and  apjwinted 
 the  courses  of  the  priests  and  Ijcvites;  that  seve- 
 ral of  the  indulged  were  sent  to  their  own  char- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  319 
 
 ges ;  that  if  the  indulgence  be  rejected,  because 
 it  proceeds  from  the  King's  supremacy,  then  he 
 might  banish  all  preaching  out  of  his  dominions, 
 by  commanding  to  preach  by  virtue  of  his  supre- 
 macy ;  that  the  preaching  of  the  gospel  is  so  im- 
 portant and  necessary,  that  many  things  may  be 
 comported  with,  in  order  to  obtain  it ;  that  the 
 mere  making  use  of  his  Majesty's  present  favour 
 doth  not  homologate  the  exorbitancies  under 
 which  we  have  groaned;  that  the  rulers  did  not 
 assign  the  indulged  ministers  to  particular  charges 
 by  express  deputation,  but  only  by  permitting 
 and  allowing  them  to  exercise  their  ministry 
 there  ;  that,  after  the  ruin  of  our  liberties,  we 
 may  accept  a  relaxation,  which  is  sinful  on  the 
 granter's  part;  that,  though  the  magistrate's  prin- 
 cipal design  in  these  indulgences  be  to  establish 
 his  own  supremacy  over  the  church,  yet  the  ac- 
 cepting of  them  cannot  imply  an  approbation  of 
 that  design  ;  that,  as  the  magistrate  proposeth 
 this  indulgence  by  command,  obedience  to  the 
 command  cannot  imply  an  engagement  to  the 
 prescriptions  annexed  ;  that,  notwithstanding  his 
 carrying  his  supremacy  to  the  highest,  the  King 
 hath  not  assumed  the  power  of  church  order  or 
 dispensation  of  word  and  sacraments  ;  that  the 
 indulged  ministers  plainly  owned,  that  the  ordi- 
 nation of  Christ  is  the  only  proper  foundation, 
 upon  which  the  exercise  of  their  ministry,  by  the 
 permission  of  this  licence,  doth  subsist,  and  the 
 magistrates'  allowance  is  but  merely  the  removal 
 of  his  former  unjust  restraints  ;  that  acceptance 
 of  the  indulgence  imported  no  subjection  of  the 
 ministry  to  the  arbitrary  will  ui'  men,  but  rather 
 an  acknowledgment  that  our  persons  are  in  sub- 
 jection to  them. 
 
 3 
 
SCO  CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND. 
 
 On  the  other  hand  it  was  pled,  that  the  procla- 
 mation for  the  induli;ence  plainly  flowed  from  the 
 King  s  supremacy  over  the  church,  and  maintains 
 his  council's  power  to  depose  ministers  from,  and 
 restore  them  to  the  exercise  of  their  ministry,  as 
 they  find  proper ;  and  that  it  w  as  granted  to 
 some  ministers  to  prevent  others  from  preaching 
 to  any  but  their  own  families  :  and  that  it  was 
 clogged  with  several  sinful  conditions,  as,  that 
 they  behoved  to  utter  nothing  agaisnt  Prelacy,  or 
 the  King's  supremacy  ;  that,  unless  they  attend 
 the  bishops  synods  and  Presbyteries,  they  must 
 confine  themselves  to  the  parishes  in  which  they 
 preach ;  that  they  should  admit  none  to  sealing 
 ordinances,  or  to  marriage,  who  belonged  to  any 
 other  established,  or  indulged  minister,  without 
 his  allowance;  that  they  give  no  coimtenance  to 
 peo[)le  of  other  congregations  coming  to  hear 
 them ;  that  they  all  administer  the  Lord's  supper 
 on  the  same  day  ;  that  they  ])reach  only  in  their 
 own  churches,  under  pain  of  being  held  keepers 
 of  conventicles;  that  all  matters  of  discipline, 
 which  formerly  belonged  to  Presbyteries,  must 
 still  belong  to  the  Bishops,  Presbytery  of  the 
 bounds,  or  next  to  it: — that  therefore,  1.  The 
 itrcepfancc  of  the  indulgence  reflected  dishonour 
 upon  Jesus  Christ,  the  only  King  and  head  of  his 
 church,  as  it  practically  declared,  that  the  accep- 
 ters did  not  hold  their  ministry  wholly  and  only 
 of  Jesus  Christ ;  that  they  hold  the  exercise  of 
 it  from  the  magistrates  either  solely  or  in  con- 
 junclion  with  ('hrist ;  that  thus  they  receive  the 
 ollice  or  exercise  of  their  ministry  from  men,  who, 
 in  this  deed,  neither  do,  nor  can  act  in  a  subor- 
 dination to  Christ,  as  the  head  and  fountain  of 
 fill  church  [)owcr;  that  thus  they  acknowledge  all 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  321 
 
 tl}e  rules  and  directions  prescribed  by  them  for 
 ordering-  of  the  exercise  of  the  ministry,  to  be  in- 
 sufficient ;  and  that  not  Christ  alone,  but  mai^is- 
 trates,  have  power  to  prescribe  the  qualifications 
 necessary  for  the  exercise  of  the  ministry  ;  that 
 not  Christ  alone,  but  magistrates  also,  have  power 
 to  prescribe  how  he  will  have  such  an  officer  set 
 ov^er  such  a  particular  flock;  and  that  hereby  they 
 concur  with  limitations  in,  and  about  the  dispen- 
 sation of  Christ's  spiritual  ordinances,  not  pre- 
 scribed by  himself,  nor  by  any  ministerial  power 
 subordinated  to  him,  but  in  opposition  to  him, 
 both  in  matter  and  manner.  2.  It  is  contrary  to 
 Presbyterian  principles  ;  such  as,  that  it  belong- 
 eth  to  the  church,  and  to  church  officers,  to  try 
 and  examine  qualifications  of  such  as  are  to  ex- 
 ercise the  ministerial  office,  and,  by  explaining 
 and  applying  Christ's  rules,  to  declare  who  are 
 fit  and  qualified  for  it ;  that  it  belongs  to  the 
 church,  or  church  judicatories,  to  convey  mini- 
 sterial office  and  power  to  persons  qualified,  and 
 to  grant  them  a  protestative  mission,  authorising 
 them  to  exercise  their  ministerial  function  ;  and 
 to  plant  and  transplant  ministers  to  particular 
 charges,  or  loose  their  relation  to  them,  as  the 
 good  of  the  church  requireth  ;  that  it  belongs  to 
 church  judicatories  to  give  injunctions  concerning 
 the  exercise  of  the  ministry  and  dispensation  of 
 the  ordinances  of  Christ ;  that  the  power  of  cen- 
 suring, suspending,  or  deposing  ministers,  belongs 
 to  the  church,  not  to  a  King  or  his  council.  8.  It 
 supports  and  confirms  the  Ring's  Erastian  supre- 
 macy. The  acceptance  of  it,  made  the  subsequent 
 act,  of  almost  unlimited  headship  over  the  church, 
 necessary  to  warrant  the  granting  of  it;  and  that 
 act  of  suprqnacy  alone  makes  the  King's  indul- 
 
 2  T 
 
322  A   COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 ^ence  a  Ief]^al  deed,  and  secures  the  indulged 
 i'roiH  beini^-  held  seditious  persons  in  the  eye  of 
 the  law.  All  the  particulars  included  in  the  two 
 preccdint^  arguments,  belong  to  the  Ring's  claim- 
 ed headship  over  the  church.  "J  he  matter  of  the 
 indulgence  is  the  very  matter  of  the  supremacy 
 alloted  him  to  settle,  enact,  and  enut  constitu* 
 lions,  acts,  and  orders  concerning  matters,  meet- 
 ings, and  persons  ecclesiastical,  according  to  his 
 royal  pleasure.  The  acceptance  of  a  benefit  flow- 
 ing from  an  usurped  power,  manifestly  homolo- 
 gate>  that  usurped  power.  4.  It  wrongs  the  peo- 
 ple concerned  in  them,  in  practically  giving  up 
 their  former  relation  to  their  flock,  and  taking  a 
 new  charge  without  any  call  from  the  people. 
 5.  While  it  plainly  confirms  and  adopts  the  Eras- 
 tian  principle  of  the  dependence  of  the  ministry 
 upon  the  magistracy,  and  the  necessary  support 
 of  it  on  the  magi>trate*s  will,  it  tends  to  the  re- 
 markable hurt  of  the  church.  IMagistrates  thrust- 
 ing out  faithful  ministers,  and  putting  in  whom 
 they  pleased  in  their  room,  did,  under  the  Arian 
 Emperors,  and  even  under  Ring  James,  much 
 hurt  to  the  church.  According  to  his  method, 
 magistrates  may  quickly  deprive  us  of  faithful, 
 or  even  Protestant  ministers,  and  [)lant  naugh- 
 ty,  erroneous,  or  Popish  priests  in  their  stead : 
 nay,  by  the  indulgence,  the  most  part  of  non-con- 
 form  ministers  are  shut  up  m  one  corner  by  two's 
 or  three's,  in  a  parish,  wliile  the  rest  of  the  land 
 is  given  up  to  the  will  of  Prelatists,  Papists,  or 
 Quakers.  It  is  intended  to  restrain  these  field 
 meetings  at  which  multitudes  of  souls  have  alrea- 
 dy found  so  much  spiritual  benefit.  It  tends  to 
 introduee  the  subjection  of  all  ministers  to  the 
 (council  in  ecclesiastical  aftairs.     It  encouragcth 
 
CHURCH  Of  SCOTLAND.  323 
 
 0th6i*s  to  enter  into  the  ministry  upon  base  con* 
 ditions.  It  abandons  the  discipline  of  the  chnrch 
 tpthe  bishops  and  their  curates.  It  i^ivesnpw  iih  an 
 ordination  of  a  faithful  succession  of  faithful  mi- 
 nisters to  the  church.  6.  It  gives  up  with  all  our 
 own  and  our  fathers  sufferings  for  our  opposition 
 to  patronage  or  Erastian  encroachments  of  Kmg 
 or  council  on  the  power  of  Christ  and  his  churchy 
 and  for  the  sole  headship  of  Christ,  or  for  Pres- 
 byterian government.  7-  It  strengthens  the  hands 
 of  Prelatists,  as  hereby  ministers  imprison  them- 
 selves in  congregations  under  their  influence.  It 
 tempts  them  to  seek  collation  from  bishops.  It 
 withdraws  them  from  helping  their  faithful  suffer- 
 ing brethren,  and  leaves  the  curates  in  quiet  pos- 
 session of  the  most  of  the  nation,  and  secures  it 
 to  them  in  all  time  coming.  It  encourageth  a 
 kind  correspondence  with  curates,  and  diminish- 
 eth  zeal  ai^ainst  them.  It  justifies  them  in  ac- 
 cepting  Prelacy  from  the  same  fountain  of  the 
 King's  supremacy.  The  conditions,  under  which 
 the  indulgence  is  accepted,  mightily  strengthens 
 their  hands.  8.  It  is  contrary  to  our  covenants, 
 in  so  far  as  they  bind  to  the  doctrine  of  Christ's 
 being  the  onl^  head  of  the  church,  and  to  maintain 
 Presbyterian  government,  and  the  liberties  and 
 privileges  of  the  church  of  Scotland,  and  abjure 
 Prelacy  and  Erastianism.  9.  The  accepters  of 
 this  indulgence  condemn  themselves,  in  so  far  as 
 they  had,  or  have  any  regard  to  field  or  house  meet- 
 ings for  religious  worship;  or  have  or  do  condemn 
 the  King's  ecclesiastical  supremacy,  or  the  entry 
 of  curates  by  the  bishops  ;  or  have  refused  to  con- 
 tinue with  their  parishes  on  the  footing  of  a  new 
 appointed  presentation;  or  have  refused  to  join 
 with  bishops  and  their  curates  in  Presbyteries  and 
 
324  A   COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THR 
 
 sydods,  accordinj;  to  Bishop  Leighton's  pro- 
 posals of  (trrommodation  ;  or  have,  or  do  scruple 
 at  the  bishops'  collation  of  their  ofiice  upon  them. 
 
 10.  It  is  prejudicial  to  field  meetings,  which  have 
 been  remarkably  blessed  by  (lod  to  the  edifica- 
 tion of  multitudes.  The  Kini;'s  letter  represents 
 it  as  contrived  and  granted  in  order  to  supjiress 
 them  utterly.  It  draws  off  the  accepters  from 
 preaching  in  the  fields,  and  if  all  named  by  the 
 council  had  accepted,  few  had  been  left  to  carry 
 on  that  necessary  work,  to  which  God  seems  to 
 be  loudly  calling.  The  acceptance  of  it  by  so 
 many,  encourageth  the  rulers  in  prosecuting  their 
 designs  against  these  meetings,  by  the  most  cruel 
 and  bloody  acts.  It  withdraws  the  people  from 
 these  meetings,  and  so  rents  them  asunder.  It 
 materially  condemns  these  meetings  as  unlawful 
 and  seditious,  and  exposeth  such  as  scruple  to 
 hear  the  indulged,  to  the  fury  of  their  adversaries. 
 
 1 1.  The  acce])tance  of  that  indulgence  is  exceed- 
 ingly offensive.  It  grieves  and  discourageth  such 
 ministers  and  peo])le  as  scrupled  at,  or  thought  it 
 unlawful.  It  violated  the  accepters'  sacred  bonds 
 of  unity;  and,  by  withdrawing  from  the  brethren, 
 particularly  such  as  preached  or  heard  at  field 
 meetings,  they  weakened  their  hands.  It  encou- 
 raged the  Prelates  and  rulers  to  proceed  with  an 
 high  hand,  in  their  apostacy  and  persecution  It 
 will  tempt  posterity  to  submit  to  magistrates'  im- 
 position of  ministers,  in  what  manner,  and  under 
 what  restrictions  they  please.  It  will  grieve  and 
 stumbU"  our  Protestant  brethren  abroad,  to  un- 
 '^^•rstand,  that  after  all  the  faithful   conteiulings 
 
 M)tch  ministers,  from  the  reformation  till 
 so  rtiany,  after  a  short  struggle,  have  so  fear- 
 complied  upon  a  small  temptation. 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  32.5 
 
 No  wonder  then,   that  Messrs.  John  Burnet, 
 Donald  Cargil,  and  eight  or  ten  others  refused  to 
 accept  this  indulgence.     Being  unable  to  attend 
 the  council,  Mr.  Burnet  sent  his  reasons  of  refus- 
 al to  the  chancellor,  bearing,  that  as  Christ  alone 
 was  the  sole  head  of  the  church,   all  ministerial 
 office,  and  power  of  exercising  it,  flowed  from 
 him  ;   whereas  the  indulgence  flowed  from  that 
 absolute  supremacy  which   his  Majesty  claimed, 
 and  had  been  affirmed  to  him  by  Parliament,  as 
 an  inherent  right  of  the  crown  ; — that  he  could 
 not  so  much   as  interpretatively  condemn  field 
 meetings,  which  had  been   always  peaceably  at- 
 tended, and  been  remarkably  blessed  by  God  ; — 
 that  he  reckoned  there  was  still  a  pastoral  rela- 
 tion standing  between  him  and  his  former  flock, 
 of  which  not  fifty,  out  of  twelve  hundred  exami- 
 nable persons,  had  ever  yet  submitted  to  the  cu- 
 rate placed  among  them — so  no  relation  could  be 
 fixed  between  him  and  another  congregation,  by 
 an  act  of  a  mere  civil  judicatory ; — that  his  con- 
 finement did  not  merely  confine  his  person,  but 
 even  his  office,  and  the  gospel  itself;  and  so  hin- 
 dered him  from  the  duty   he  was  called  to  for 
 the  good  of  the  church,  which  was  now  in  hazard  to 
 bes\vallowedupbyJesuits,Quakers,&c.;  and  while 
 three  parts  of  the  kingdom  were  groaning  under 
 the  want  of  the  faithful  preaching  of  the  gospel, 
 a  few  shires  in  the  west  were  made  the  common 
 jail  of  all  the  ministers  permitted  to  preach;  that 
 he  looked  on  a  permission  to  preach  without  any 
 call  from  the  people,  authority  or  assistance  of  a 
 Presbytery,  and  without  the  exercise  of  church 
 discipline  and  government,  as  very  lame,  and  the 
 restrictions  annexed  to  it,  as  an  heavy  yoke. — 
 The  other  refusers  of  the  indulgence  drew  up  a 
 j)aper  of  much  the  same  import ;  and  in  which 
 
S26  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 they  begg-ed  the  council  to  believe,  that  their 
 non-compliance  (lowed  from  real  tenderness  of 
 conscience;  and  that  by  their  influence  and  deal- 
 ing with  ins  Majesty,  they  might  have  an  unre- 
 strained liberty  to  preach  to  their  flocks,  or  others, 
 as  providence  called  them,  in  a  peaceable  manner, 
 for  the  edification  of  the  body  of  Christ. 
 
 Several  of  tlie  compilers  with  the  indulgence 
 formed  a  paper  of  grievances  to  be  given  in  to 
 the  council,  when  they  received  it,  as  a  testimo- 
 ny against  the  evils  implied  in  the  grant  of  it, 
 bearing,  that  however  thankfully  they  received 
 his  Majesty's  permission  to  exercise  their  minis- 
 try, yet  they  disliked  that  Erastianism,  which  ap- 
 peared in  the  grant  of  it ;  that,  though  they  dis- 
 allowed all  tumultuary  and  seditious  meetings 
 of  subjects,  yet  they  could  not  condemn  the  field 
 meetings  for  preaching  and  hearing  the  gos()el. 
 as  stick,  and  were  grieved  that  the  grant  of  their 
 indulgence  did  so  ; — that  the  indulgence  breaks 
 the  relation  between  ministers  and  their  former 
 Hocks,  and  deprives  the  people,  to  whom  they  are 
 appointed,  of  any  free  call ;  that  it  shuts  them 
 iij)  sometimes,  by  two's  or  three's,  in  a  parish, 
 where  one  might  serve,  and  imposed  on  them 
 flocks  belonging  to  faithful  brethren  ;  that  it 
 confined  them  as  evil  doers,  without  any  trial  or 
 conviction  of  guilt,  and  hindered  them  from  meet- 
 ing in  judicatories  or  even  mutual  converse,  and 
 restrained  the  faithful  preachingof  the  gospel  from 
 a  great  part  of  the  nation;  and  exposed  such  as  did 
 not  comply,  to  far  greater  sufiferings  than  former- 
 ly; that  it  entirely  cut  oif  from  the  people  all  hope 
 of  haviuiT  their  f.iitliful  pastors  restored  to  them  •. 
 and  that  all  their  restrictions  were  plainly  form- 
 ed in  favours  of  the  Frelatic   party,   and  to  the 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  827 
 
 disadvantage  of  Presbyterian  ministers  and  peo- 
 ple implied  a  subjection  to  Erastianism,  and  some 
 of  them  thrust  the   accepters   into  a  direct  and 
 formal  subjection  to  Prelacy. — After  they  had  in 
 several  meetings,    considered    this    paper,   they 
 dropt  it  altogether  for  want  of  harmony,  with  re- 
 spect to  it. — They  agreed,  that  when  they  ap- 
 peared before  the  council,  to  receive  their  licence, 
 and  instructions,  Mr.  George  Hutchinson  should. 
 by  a  speech,  in  their  name,  give  some  testimony 
 ao'ainst  the  Erastianism    and   sinful   restrictions 
 connected  therewith.    But  by  neglecting  to  speak 
 at  the  beginning,  and  by  delivering  himself  in  an 
 obscure  equivocal  manner,  it  was  to  little  or  no 
 purpose.     Meanwhile,  IMr.  Alexander  Blair  ho- 
 nestly told  the  council,    that  as  he  looked  upon 
 himself  as  an  ambassador  of  Christ,  he  could  not 
 receive  instructions   from   them,  for  regulating 
 him  in  the  exercise  of  his  ministry,   and  let  fall 
 their  instructions:  on  account  of  which  the  coun- 
 cil ordered  him  to  prison. 
 
 While  the  outed  ministers  were  sadly  divided 
 about  the  indulgence,  great  pains  were  taken  to  de- 
 coy them  and  the  people  into,  at  least,  a  partial 
 submission  to  Prelacy.  Dr.  Burnet,  afterwards 
 bishop  of  Salisbury,  and  other  popular  preachers, 
 were  sent  to  the  West  Country,  to  preach  in  the 
 several  kirks,  in  hopes  that  this  would  bring  the 
 people  to  a  liking  of  Episcopal  preachers.  But 
 few  heard  them,  except  some  of  the  younger  sort, 
 out  of  curiosity.  Burnet  says,  that  he  and  his 
 brethren  were  amazed  to  see  poor  common  peo- 
 ple, even  cottagers  and  servants,  so  capable  to  ar- 
 gue upon  church  government,  and  the  power  of 
 Princes  in  matters  of  religion.  'J'his  failing, 
 Leighton  of  Dumblain,  now  administator  of  the 
 
328  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 Archbishopric  of  Glasgow,  proj)oscd  an  accom- 
 viodation  to  the  Pres!>yti'rian  minislt'is,  allowing; 
 them  to  retain  their  own  prineiples,  and  to  [)r(j- 
 test  aj^ainst  what  they  thoui^ht  wrong  in  Prela- 
 cy, and  tlien,  like  their  fathers  before  16S8,  to 
 concur  in  Presbyteries,  which  had  constant  mo- 
 derators. The  Presl)yterian  ministers,  indulged 
 and  not  indulged,  after  several  conferences,  de- 
 clined compliance,  and  the  more  readily,  as  Lei^h- 
 ton,  with  all  his  hii^h  pretences  to  relij^ious  peace 
 and  piety,  would  not  or  could  not  assure  them, 
 that  the  bishops,  who  moderate,  should  not  have 
 a  negative  over  the  synod's  decisions. 
 
 But  force  was  the  principal  mean  used  for 
 causini^  both  ministers  and  people  to  submit  to 
 what  the  court  pleased.  As  Charles's  first  indul- 
 gence of  the  Presbyterian  ministers  at  his  own 
 hand,  by  his  council,  had  exceeded  the  limits  of 
 the  supremacy  which  had  been  formerly  allowed 
 him  by  the  Parliament,  and  was  contrary  to  the 
 laws  establishing  Prelacy,  the  bishops  complain- 
 ed of  it,  as  an  illegal  trampling  on  their  power. — 
 The  Parliament  Hj69  therefore  asserted  him  and 
 his  successors  to  have  an  unlimited  supremaci/ 
 over  the  church,  as  an  inherent  ri<j;ht  of  the  crown, 
 by  which  they  ndght  order  and  dispose  of  the  ex- 
 ternal government  of  the  church,  and  settle,  en- 
 act, and  emit  such  constitutions,  acts,  and  orders, 
 concerning  it,  and  the  persons  employed  in  it,  and 
 all  ecclesiastical  meetings,  and  matters  to  be  pro- 
 posed and  determined  in  them,  as  they  pleased  ; 
 and  rescinded  all  laws,  acts,  and  clauses  thereof, 
 and  all  customs  and  constitutions,  civil  and  ec- 
 clesiastical, which  are  contrary  to,  and  inconsist- 
 ent with  his  Majesty's  supremacy  as  now  assert- 
 ed.    This  Parliament  also  ratified  some  acts  of 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  329 
 
 the  privy  council,  requiring  all  the  inhabitants  of 
 the  south-west  of  Scotland,  under  severe  penal- 
 ties, to  deliver  up  their  arms;  and  that  if  parish- 
 ioners permitted  any  hurt  to  be  done  to  the  vio- 
 lent persecuting  curates,  they  should  be  reputed 
 as  having  art  and  part  of  the  crime,  and  be  liable 
 for  all  damages  ;  and  forfeiting  the  estates  of  such 
 as  had  been  concerned  in  the  late  rising  of  Pent- 
 land  hills.  Soon  after,  the  council  in  1670,  to 
 please  the  bishops  and  their  curates,  prohibited 
 the  indulged  ministers  to  lecture  or  expound  a 
 portion  of  Scripture  before  the  forenoon  sermon, 
 under  pain  of  being  forbidden  the  exercise  of  their 
 ministry,  within  this  kingdom.  The  soldiers  were 
 appointed  to  apprehend  the  ministers,  heritors, 
 and  tenants,  that  presumed  to  attend  the  field 
 meetings  for  preaching  of  the  gospel,  and  to  cause 
 them  appear  before  the  council,  along  with  a  list 
 of  witnesses  against  them. 
 
 Mr.  John  Menzies,  minister  of  Caerlaverock, 
 near  Dumfries,  shocked  with  the  severities  used 
 against  Presbyterians, while  Papists,  who  abound- 
 ed and  promoted  their  idolatry  and  superstition 
 with  great  zeal,  remained  unmolested,  presented 
 a  solemn  testimony  against  Prelacy  to  his  Pres- 
 bytery, and  Messrs.  Alexander  and  John  Car- 
 michaels,  Thomas  Forrester  and  others,  after- 
 ward deserted  the  Prelates.  But  none  of  these 
 things  moved  the  persecutors  to  moderation. 
 
 The  Parliament,  1670,  enacted,  That  wlioso- 
 ever  refused  to  be  witnesses,  even  against  their 
 nearest  relations,  with  respect  to  breaches  of  the 
 public  laws  of  the  kingdom,  and  particularly  their 
 attendance  at  field  preachings,  should  be  fined, 
 imprisoned,  or  banished  ; — that  if  any  outcd  mi- 
 nister  nut  licensed  by  the  council,  or  tolerated  by 
 
 2  u 
 
330  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY   OF  THE 
 
 the  bishop,  presume  to  preach,  expound  the  scrip- 
 ture, or  pray  in  any  meeting",  hut  in  his  own  house, 
 and  where  only  his  own  family  are  present,  he 
 shall  be  imprisoned,  till  he  find  bail  not  to  keep 
 another  conventicle,  under  the  penalty  of  5000 
 merks,  or  else  consent  to  leave  the  kin^^dom, 
 never  to  return  without  his  majesty's  licence  ; 
 and  that  these  present  at  house  conventicles  be 
 fined, — heritors  in  a  fourth  part  of  their  yearly 
 rent,  tenants  in  L.25,  and  cottars  in  L.12  Scots, 
 — and  that  every  minister  or  preacher  at  field 
 meetings,  be  punished  by  death  and  confiscation 
 of  goods,  and  these  present  be  fined  in  double  of 
 the  above  for  house  meetings  ;  and  that  every 
 apprehender  of  a  field  preacher  should  have  500 
 merks  of  reward  ;  and  the  sheriffs,  stewards, 
 and  lords  of  regalities,  all  the  fines  below  these 
 of  heritors  for  themselves ; — that  every  person, 
 who  procured  baptism  for  his  child  by  any  unli- 
 censed or  unauthorized  minister  and  not  in  a  re- 
 gular manner,  shall  be  fined,  heritors  in  a  fourth 
 part  of  their  yearly  rent ;  every  person  above  a 
 tenant  in  a  L.  1 00  Scots  ;  every  inferior  merchant, 
 tenant,  or  considerable  tradesman,  in  L.50 ;  every 
 meaner  burgess,  tradesman,  or  cottar  in  L.20, 
 and  every  servant  in  half  a  year's  fee  ;  and  sher- 
 iffs, stewards,  and  lords  of  regalities,  to  have  all 
 fines  below  these  of  heritors,  as  their  encourage- 
 ment to  diligence  in  their  execution  of  this  act ; 
 — that  all  subjects  of  the  reformed  religioji,  who 
 do  not  frequent  the  ordinary  meetings  for  divine 
 worship  in  their  own  parish  churches,  for  every 
 offence,  be  fined,  heritors  in  an  eighth  part  of  their 
 yearly  rent  ;  every  person  above  the  degree  of  a 
 tenant,  in  L.12  Scots;  every  tenant  or  consider- 
 able tradesman  and  inferior  merchant    in  L.6  ; 
 
CHURCH  OF   i>COTLAND.  331 
 
 and   all  below  that   station  in  L.2  Scots As 
 
 an  addition  to  these  persecuting  acts,  the  Parlia- 
 ment 1672,  enacted,  That  none  should  be  oflicers 
 of  the  militia  but  Episcopalians ;  and  both  offi- 
 cers and  soldiers  take  the  oath  of  allegiance  and 
 declaration,  under  pain  of  imprisonment  and  ba- 
 nishment; that  none  but  those  authorized  by  law, 
 should  ordain  any  to  the  ministry  ;  and  all  ordi- 
 nations by  Presbyterian  ministers  since  1661,  be 
 held  void  and  null;  that  all  that  had  not  a  certi- 
 ficate from  their  parish  minister  that  their  chil- 
 dren were  baptized  within  thirty  days  of  their 
 birth,  should  be  fined,  heritors  in  a  fourth  part 
 of  their  yearly  rent ;  merchants  in  L.lOO  Scots  ; 
 &c.  and  that  all  that  did  not  observe  the  anni- 
 versary of  the  29th  of  May,  should  be  fined,  or 
 otherwise  punished. 
 
 Dreadful  were  the  severities  carried  on  against 
 the  non-conformists.  While  the  indulged  minis- 
 ters were  disliked  by  many  of  the  people,  for 
 their  want  of  due  faithfulness,  they  were  not  a 
 little  harassed  by  the  council  for  their  lecturing, 
 — baptizing  of  children  not  belonging  to  their  pa- 
 rishes,— giving  some  testimony  against  the  apos- 
 tacy  of  the  times,  and  for  not  observing  of  the 
 anniversary  thanksgiving  on  the  29th  of  May,  or 
 the  like.  The  refusers  of  the  indulgence,  and 
 all  that  preached  at,  or  attended  field  meetings, 
 were  still  more  cruelly  persecuted,  by  fines,  im- 
 prisonment, or  banishment.  Many  were  the  ex- 
 orbitant fines  imposed  upon  gentlemen,  and  others, 
 in  the  shires  of  Dumbarton,  Lanark,  Ayr,  Gallo- 
 way, Dumfries,  and  Renfrew,  for  mere  non-con- 
 formity to  Prelacy,  and  non-attendance  on  the 
 ministrations  of  ignorant  and  |)rofligate  curates. 
 These  of  eleven  gentlemen   in  the  shire  of  Ken- 
 
.332  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 frew,  amounted  to  near  L. 3 1,000  Sterling. 
 
 Finding  that,  notwithstanding,  the  field  meetings 
 more  and  more  increased,  the  council  in  June 
 1674,  emitted  two  proclamations,  the  first  of 
 which  requires  heritors  to  become  bound  for  their 
 tenants,  and  tenants  for  their  families,  cottars, 
 and  servants,  that  they  should  not,  under  the  pain 
 of  L.2.3  Scots  for  each  tenant, — L.12  for  each 
 cottar, — and  a  fourth  part  of  their  year's  fee  for 
 each  servant,  and  the  half  for  each  wife  or  child, 
 be  present  at  any  house  conventicle,  nor  at  any 
 field  conventicle,  under  the  penalty  of  the  double. 
 If  tenants  refused  to  give  bond  to  their  heritors, 
 their  whole  property  was  to  be  forfeited  for  them, 
 and  no  new  leases  were  to  be  granted  without 
 such  engagement.  And  all  magistrates  had  an 
 imlimited  power  to  require  every  person  whom 
 they  suspected,  to  give  security  for  their  good  be- 
 haviour in  this  matter.  The  other  imported,  That 
 all  those  that  should  apprehend  convocators  to, 
 or  attenders  on  conventicles,  should  be  reward- 
 ed with  their  fines  or  forfeited  property  ;  and 
 whoever  should  apprehend  any  minister  at  con- 
 venticles, should  have  1000  merks,  and  2000  for 
 JNIessrs.  Welsh,  Semple,  and  Arnot. — They  fined 
 eleven  gentlemen  in  Fife,  in  about  L.7000  Scots, 
 for  attending  conventicles,  and  because  one  of 
 them  had  harboured  jMr.  Welsh  ;  and  denounced 
 forty  or  fifty  more,  and  soon  after  fifty  more,  who 
 compeared  not,rc6c7<y.— The  field  meetings  still  in- 
 creasing, and  being  attended  with  remarkable 
 countenance  from  God,  several  conform  ministers 
 attended  them,  and  joined  the  sufferers.  The 
 council,  finding  that  they  could  not  get  all  the 
 attendants  prosecuted,  not  a  few  of  which  were 
 ladies  and  their  children,  they  raised  new  regi- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  333 
 
 merits  of  soldiers,  and  stationed  them  in  a  consid- 
 erable number  of  garrisons  in  these  places  where 
 conventicles  were  most  commonly  held,  in  order 
 that  they  might  deter  from  them  or  rush  forth 
 upon  the  people,  while  they  were  met  for  public 
 worship  ;  and  the  country  about  was  required  to 
 furnish  them  with  all  things  necessary.     In  con- 
 sequence  hereof,  some  of  the  sufferers  began  to 
 take  arms  with  them  to  their  meetings,  in  order 
 to  defend  themselves,  if  attacked.     They  also  is- 
 sued forth  letters  o{  iiitercommuning  against  about 
 ninety  or  an  hundred  ministers,  gentlemen,  ladies, 
 and  others  for  preaching,  or  hearing  at  conventi- 
 cles, or  not  appearing  when  summoned,  to  re- 
 nounce their  principles,  or  fall  a  sacrifice  to  their 
 persecutor's   rage.     These  letters  cut  them  off 
 from  all  society  in  the  kingdom  of  Scotland  ;  and 
 it  was  declared,  that  whosoever  should  receive, 
 harbour,  or  converse  with  them  by  word  or  writ, 
 or  supply  them  with  meat,  drink,  clothes,  or  any 
 other  necessaries  of  life,   should  be   prosecuted 
 with   rigour  as  guilty  with   them  of  the   same 
 crimes ;  and  all  sheriffs,  &c.  were  ordered  to  ap- 
 prehend them  wherever  they   could  be  found. 
 This  year  the  fines  levied  by  the  Earl  of  Hume 
 in  Berwickshire,  amounted  to  near  L.27,000 Scots. 
 Meanwhile,  God  remarkably  countenanced  some 
 sacramental  occasions  among  the  suflerers,  espe- 
 cially one  in  Elginshire,  where  the  real   Christ- 
 ians were  generally  so  filled  with  the  consolations 
 of  Christ,  that  they  scarcely  knew,  whether  they 
 were  in  the  body  or  not;    and  not  a  few  were  de- 
 lightfully converted  to  the  Eord. 
 
 The  council  had  a  little  before  enacted,  that 
 every  proprietor,  on  whoso  ground  a  convent iile 
 or  field   meeting   for   preaciiing    the  gosix.l  wai 
 
3.3I<  A  COMl*HNI)iOUS   HISTORY  OK  THE 
 
 held,  should  pay  L.50  Scots  of  fine,  and  had  ri- 
 i;orousIy  prosecuted,  fined,  or  imprisoned  such 
 ministers  or  attendants  on  such  meetings,  as  they 
 could  find,  and  had  punished  several  of  the  in- 
 dulged ministers  with  the  want  of  a  year's  sti- 
 pend, and  of  it  in  all  time  coming,  unless  an  order 
 for  payment  were  granted  by  the  council, — they, 
 at  last,  in  1G77,  projected  the  raising  of  8000  sa- 
 vage Highlanders  to  march  into  the  south-west 
 counties  of  Scotland,  and  there,  by  free  quarters, 
 plunder,  murder,  or  whatever  way  they  pleased,  to 
 iorce  people  to  hear  the  curates,  and  oblige  heri- 
 tors to  bind  themselves  for  their  tenants,  and  te- 
 nants for  their  families  and  cottars,  behaving  them- 
 selves answerably  to  the  laws.  The  Highland 
 host  and  regular  forces,  to  the  number  of  10,000, 
 with  such  a  train  of  artillery  as  if  they  had  in- 
 tended to  besiege  fortified  cities,  marched  thi- 
 ther ;  but,  notwithstanding  all  their  free  (piar- 
 tering,  plunder,  and  other  oppressions,  the  heri- 
 tors, and  several  noblemen  among  them,  refused 
 to  give  bond  for  the  conformity  of  their  families 
 or  tenants  ;  nor  could  the  people  be  got  provoked 
 to  take  arms  in  their  own  defence,  which  would 
 have  given  the  managers  an  handle  to  murder 
 them,  or  by  forfeiture  deprive  them  of  every 
 thing  belonging  to  them.  After  some  weeks,  the 
 managers  being  ashamed  of  their  horrid  cruelties, 
 anil  shameless  robberies,  ordered  the  Highland- 
 ers, all  but  ^00,  home.  They  carried  along  with 
 them  horses  and  goods  to  the  utmost  of  (heir 
 power.  To  mention  particular  plunders  would 
 i)e  endless.  Trom  the  three  small  districts  of 
 Kyle,  Canick,  and  (ainningham,  they  destroyed 
 and  carried  off  about  the  value  of  L.  140,000 
 Scots.     The  council  pushed   on  the  subscription 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  S35 
 
 of  the  bond  a])ove  mentioned,  though  generally 
 without  the  success  they  wished,  notwithstand- 
 ing they  insisted,  that  such  as  refused,  shuuhl 
 give  lawborrows,  or  security  for  their  kind  beha- 
 viour to  his  majesty.  The  refusers,  and  sundry 
 noblemen  among  them,  were  cruelly  prosecuted. 
 The  bond  and  highland  host  being  found  ineffec- 
 tual  to  put  a  stop  to  field  meetings,  or  force  peo- 
 ple to  hear  the  profligate  and  persecuting  curates, 
 a  Convention  of  Estates  was  called  in  1678,  which 
 imposed  a  cess  of  L.360,000  yearly,  for  the  space 
 of  five  years,  in  order  to  maintain  a  standing  ar- 
 my for  the  suppression  of  field  conventicles.  The 
 payment  of  this  cess,  as  the  indulgence  had  done 
 before,  to  the  great  joy  of  the  bishops,  occasion- 
 ed warm  contentions  among  the  Presbyterians. 
 Some  thinking  it  lawful  to  pay  it,  as  a  tax  laid 
 on  by  authority,  even  as  Christ  paid  tribute  to 
 Caesar,  and  advised  others  to  do  the  same ; — 
 others  thinking  it  unlawful,  as  an  imposition  of 
 tyrants,  and  plainly  intended  to  promote  wicked 
 ends.  After  the  council  had  ordered  sixty-seven 
 of  the  imprisoned  sufferers  to  be  transported  to 
 Virginia,  as  a  kind  of  slaves,  and  whom  provi- 
 dence relieved  at  London  ;  and  had  levied  more 
 troops,  and  formed  a  new  military  oath  for  secur- 
 ing the  soldiers'  full  execution  of  the  cruel  work 
 committed  to  them,  and  prosecuted  many  parti- 
 cular persons,  and  punished  them  by  fines,  impri- 
 sonment, or  the  like,  a  few  of  the  suflerers,  who 
 had  formed  a  resolution  to  kill  one  Cannichael, 
 who  had,  for  a  considerable  time,  most  furiously 
 persecuted  the  non-conformists  in  Fife,  fining, 
 and  imprisoning  multitudes,  and  torturing  ser- 
 vants to  make  them  discover  their  masters  or 
 their  property,  and  beating  wives  and  chihlron  to 
 
330  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THR 
 
 make  them  inform  ai^^ainst  their  husbands  am! 
 parents, — not  to  mention  his  rapes,  adulteries, 
 and  like  abominable  wickedness.  After  they  had 
 in  vain  searched  for  him,  where  they  were  in- 
 formed he  was  to  hunt  that  day,  and  were  just 
 goini^  to  separate,  they  were  unexpectedly  inform- 
 ed, that  archbishop  Sharp  was  at  Ceres, in  his  way 
 home  to  St.  Andrew's.  They  thought  that  God 
 had  delivered  into  their  hand  this  perjured  de- 
 stroyer of  their  church,  arch-persecutor,  and  mur- 
 derer of  multitudes  of  their  brethren,  and  who 
 sought  their  own  life  ;  and  so  reckoning  them- 
 selves in  an  open  state  of  war  with  him,  resolved 
 to  take  away  his  life,  which  they  did,  not  with- 
 out some  difficulty,  about  a  mile  south-west  from 
 St.  Andrew's.  It  is  certain,  he  richly  deserved 
 to  die  by  the  hands  of  public  justice  in  the  most 
 shameful  and  miserable  form.  But  how  far,  in 
 their  circumstantiated  case,  it  was  lawful  and  pru- 
 dent for  these  persons  to  take  away  his  life,  I 
 leave  to  the  judgment  of  God,  whose  providence 
 preserved  all  that  had  an  active  hand  in  it  from 
 the  fury  of  their  murderous  persecutors,  notwith- 
 standing all  they  could  do  to  apprehend  them.  It 
 nevertheless  gave  the  managers,  who  represent- 
 ed his  death  as  a  kind  of  martyrdom,  an  handle 
 for  proceeding  in,  or  increasing  their  cruelties, 
 and  for  ensnaring  many  with  that  question.  Whe- 
 ther the  kUruii^  of  him  was  murder  or  not  ? 
 
 The  council  having  emitted  a  i)roclamation 
 prepared  by  Sharp,  before  his  death,  represent- 
 ing field  conventicles  as  tending  to  the  ruin  of 
 the  Christian  religion,  the  introduction  of  Popery 
 and  heresy,  the  subversion  of  monarchy,  and  the 
 tnntenipt  of  all  laws  and  government;  and  ap- 
 puinting  all  judges  and  oilicers  of  the  army  to  pro- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  337 
 
 ceed  against  all  that  went  to  them  with  arms  as 
 traitors,  and  to  execute  the  laws  against  all  other 
 attendants  on  them.— The  persecuted,  whose 
 numbers  daily  increased,  therefore  found,  that 
 their  safety  was  promoted  by  their  attending  in 
 large  multitudes.  Pushed  by  Robert  Hamilton, 
 brother  to  the  Laird  of  Preston,  and  the  ladv  of 
 -barlstoun,  a  pious  Christian,  but  perhaps  too 
 rash  and  headstrong,  a  number  of  them  agreed 
 upon  a  solemn  testimony  against  the  apostacy, 
 wicked  laws,  and  cruel  persecution  of  the  mana- 
 gers; and  he,  and  about  eighty  armed  men,  pub- 
 lished It  at  the  cross  of  Rutherglen,  on  the  anni- 
 versary thanksgiving  for  Charles's  restoration. 
 May  29,  1679,  and  burnt  a  copy  of  the  wicked 
 acts,  against  which  they  testified.  This  more  and 
 more  provoked  the  fury  of  the  managers.  Gra- 
 ham of  Claverhouse,  afterward  Viscount  of  Dun- 
 dee, a  most  cruel  and  bloody  monster,  having  an 
 unlimited  power  to  kill  and  destroy  all  that  he 
 found  in  arms,  seized  Mr.  King,  and  about  fourteen 
 others,  who  neither  were  in  arms,  nor  had  any 
 thing  laid  to  their  charge  ;  and  driving  them 
 before  him,  bound  two  by  two,  attacked  a  field- 
 meeting  near  Drumclog  the  day  after,  being  Sab- 
 bath, but  was  defeated  with  the  slaugliter  of 
 twenty,  if  not  near  forty,  of  his  soldiers.'  Claver- 
 house  escaping  to  Glasgow,  alarmed  the  troops 
 that  were  there.  Hamilton  and  his  friends,  flush- 
 ed  with  their  success,  and  perhajjs  too  dilatory 
 in  their  pursuit,  entered  into  Glasgow,  next  day; 
 but  after  the  loss  of  six  or  eight,  were,  by  the 
 firing  upon  them  from  the  houses,  obliged  to 
 retreat  to  Hamilton,  where  they  formed  a  sort  of 
 camp  for  their  own  defence. 
 2  X 
 
S38 
 
 A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 The  council,  by  proclamation,  required  all 
 those  who  had  taken  arms,  to  lay  them  down, 
 and  surrender  thcniselves  to  some  officer  of  the 
 army  or  mni^^istrate,  within  the  space  of  twenty- 
 iour  hours,  hut  |)romised  no  indemnity; — and  re- 
 quired all  heritors  and  heads  of  families  to  per- 
 niit  none  of  tlu  ir  tenants,  children,  or  servants 
 to  join  them,  under  pain  of  he  in^  looked  upon  as 
 disaffected  persons; — and  farther  required  all  the 
 luilitia  in  the  kiui^dom,  to  join  and  act  with  the 
 rci^ular  forces,  under  severe  penalties;  and  all  he- 
 ritors and  freeholders  to  attend  the  King's  host. 
 Finding-,  that  those  who  had  appeared  in  arms, 
 had  nothini^*  to  expect  but  tortures  and  death, 
 their  friends  hastened  from  all  places  around  to 
 defend  them,  if  possible,  in  so  much,  that  the 
 King's  trooj)s,  fearing  an  attack,  retreated  from 
 Glasgow  to  I]dinbu)gh,  and  begged  that  assis- 
 tance should  be  sent  them  from  Kngland.  To 
 render  him  odious  to  the  non-conformists,  both 
 in  England  and  Scotland,  Charles,  his  father,  ap- 
 pointed the  Duke  of  Monmouth  to  command  the 
 army  ;  and  the  council  insisted  that  the  barl)a- 
 rous  Dalziel  should  be  his  lieutenant.  JMean- 
 while,  the  divisions  which  took  place  among  the 
 sufferers,  who  were  once  about  four  thousand, 
 but  many  of  them  poorly  armed,  relative  to  the 
 making  of  the  'nuluhj;cnce  a  cause  of  fasting,  and 
 the  owning  of  Charles's  l'in(j;Jii  outJwritij,  made 
 many  leave  them,  and  dispirited  such  as  remain- 
 ed, that  few  of  them  behaved  with  any  courage, 
 and  so  were  easily  routed  at  Bothwcl-l]ridge, 
 lour  hundred  being  killed,  mostly  in  the  pursuit, 
 and  twelve  hundred  surrendered  prisoners,  who 
 were  stripped  almost  naked,  and  obliged  to  lie  flat 
 on  the  ground  fur  a  considerable  time  ;  and  if  any 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  3S9 
 
 but  raised  himself  a  little,  he  was  shot  dead  in  an 
 instant.  Some  of  the  officers  proposed  to  burn 
 Glasgow,  Hamilton,  and  all  the  country  about 
 Bothwel- Bridge.  But  Monmouth  rejected  their 
 motion  with  indignation. — His  compassion  to  the 
 sufferers  issued  in  his  being  quickly  recalled,  and 
 Dalziel,  who  was  as  cruel  as  either  managers  or 
 devils  could  have  wished  him,  made  General  of 
 the  forces  in  his  stead. 
 
 Dreadful  was  the  case  of  the  prisoners  at  Edin- 
 burgh. Many  of  them  were  tried  and  executed  : 
 others  were  shipped  off  for  Virginia  to  be  slaves, 
 and,  after  most  barbarous  usage,  were  mostly 
 drowned  in  a  storm  on  the  coast  of  Orkney,  the 
 Popish  captain  having  obstinately  refused  to  open 
 the  hatches,  to  give  them  an  opportunity  to  es- 
 cape, as  himself  and  the  sailors  did.  Struck  with 
 horror  at  the  cruelty,  a  sailor  risked  his  life,  and, 
 by  cutting  through  the  deck,  got  about  fifty  of 
 them  out  alive,  while  some  hundreds  were  thus 
 wilfully  drowned  in  the  hold.  Not  only  they 
 who  had  been  in  arms,  in  the  affair  of  Bothwel, 
 but  such  as  had  harboured  or  assisted  them  with 
 meat  or  drink,  or  who  had  not  attended  the  King's 
 host,  according  to  the  proclamation,  were  cruelly 
 prosecuted,  and  their  estates  or  property  forfeit- 
 ed, and  given  to  such  persecutors  as  his  Majesty 
 and  the  council  thought  fit.  Some  that  were 
 thought  less  guilty,  were  released  upon  signing  a 
 bond,  in  which  they  acknowledged  the  rising  at 
 Bothwel  Bridge rc^6('//io/i, and  engaged  nevermore 
 to  take  up  arms  without,  or  against  his  Mnjesty, 
 or  his  authority,  even  in  self-defence ;  !)ut  they 
 were  to  have  no  benefit  of  the  indemnity,  if  ever 
 they  should  be  found  in  arms  at  any  field  c(jnven- 
 ticle.  Many  choosed  rather  to  continue  prisoners. 
 
310  A  COxMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 and  hazard  even  life  itself,  than  subscrihe  such  a 
 bond.  About  the  same  time,  indulged  ministers 
 were  recjuired  to  subscril)e  a  bond,  in  which  they 
 engaged  themselves  to  live  praccabbj,  (i.  e.  give 
 no  |)lain  testinumy  against  the  managers*  aposta- 
 cy  and  persecution)  and  to  present  themselves  be- 
 fore the  privy  council,  when  called,  and  to  have 
 sureties,  who  shoidd  engage  themselves,  their  heirs, 
 and  successors,  for  their  so  doing,  under  pain  of 
 paying  six  thousand  nierks  Scots,  if  they  did  not 
 present  them  to  the  council.  These  bands,  most 
 of  the  ministers  thought  lawful,  in  their  present 
 circumstances.  But  others,  chiefly  the  author  of 
 the  Banders  disbanded,  shews  that  it  was  sinful, 
 scandalous,  and  inconvenient  to  comply  with 
 them. 
 
 An  indemnity  was  published,  but  with  so  ma- 
 ny exceptions  of  ministers  and  heritors,  who  were 
 concerned  in  the  rebellion,  or  any  way  contribut- 
 ed to  it,  or  who  did  not  come  to  assist  the  King's 
 host,  and  loaded  with  the  condition  of  engaging 
 never  to  bear  arms  against  the  King  or  his  au- 
 thority, nor  to  be  present  at  field  conventicles, 
 that  it  was  almost  good  for  nothing.  Meanwhile, 
 Claverhouse,  with  his  dragoons,  terribly  oppress- 
 ed the  west  country  by  free  quarters,  plunders, 
 tortures,  and  murders.  Circuit  courts  were  ap- 
 pointed rigorously  to  punish  all  such  as  did  not 
 lay  hold  on  the  indemnity;  and  all,  who  had  been 
 concerned  in  the  risings  of  Pentland  and  Both- 
 wel,  and  the  murder  of  the  archbishop,  or  had  any 
 way  supplied  or  corres|)onded  with  them.  The 
 propriciors  of  the  grounds,  on  which  any  of  the 
 murderers  of  the  archbishop  lived,  who  were  par- 
 ticularly described,  were  commanded  to  appre- 
 hend them,  and  present  tliem  to  the  circuit:  — 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  34*1 
 
 and  if  they  fled,  their  wives,  chiUhen,  and  ser- 
 vants, were  to  be  driven  from  the  place.  A  re- 
 ward of  ten  thousand  nierks  was  offered  to  those 
 who  should  bring  in  any  of  these  murderers, 
 dead  or  alive,  particularly  John  Balfour  of  Kin- 
 loch,  and  David  Hackstoun  of  Rathiliet,  (who 
 had  refused  to  have  any  hand  in  the  slaughter, 
 lest  it  should  be  said  private  injuries,  done  to 
 him  by  Sharp,  had  influenced  him.)  Great  num- 
 bers were  condemned  and  executed,  sometimes 
 merely  because  they  scrupled  to  acknowledge  the 
 slaughter  of  the  archbishop  to  be  murder,  and  the 
 rising  at  Bothwel  rebellion,  or  would  not  take  the 
 hond  prescribed  by  the  council 
 
 Next  year,  1 6"80,  Charles  and  his  council  agreed 
 to  appoint  the  soldiers  to  attack  all  tlmse  that 
 had  been  forfeited  by  the  Parliament  or  criminal 
 court,  all  ministers  and  heritors  w  ho  had  been  in 
 the  rebellion,  or  heritors  who  had  contributed 
 any  thing  to  it ;  all  rebels,  who  had  not  taken 
 the  hond,  or  had  been  at  field  conventicles  since 
 the  27th  of  July  last;  all  those  who  had  injured 
 the  Episcopal  clergy  ;  all  assassins,  especially  the 
 murderers  of  the  archbishop  ;  and  api)ointed  the 
 mansion-houses,  castles,  or  towers  standing  on 
 the  forfeited  estates,  to  be  used  by  the  forces  as 
 garrisons,  from  which  they  might  be  ready  to 
 sally  forth  upon  the  above  and  like  persons.  A 
 paper  found  upon  Henry  Hall,  when  he  was  ap- 
 prehended at  Queensferry,  and  a  declaration  ])ub- 
 lished  at  Sanquhar,  in  which  all  allegiance  to  Ring 
 Charles  was  renounced,  and  especially  the  solemn 
 excommvmication,  and  deliverance  to  Satan,  of 
 King  Charles,  Dukes  of  York,  Monmouth,  Lau- 
 derdale, and  Rothes,  Sir  (jeori;e  3M\enzie,  the 
 King's  advocate,  and  General  Dalzlel,  on  account 
 
342  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 of  their  respective  horrible  crimes,  by  Mr.  Donald 
 Cargil,  at  the  I'oi  u ood,  not  only  terribly  infuri- 
 ated the  persecuting  niana^^ers,  but  drew  upon 
 the  strict  party  loads  of  re[)roach  from  their  in- 
 dulged brethren.  But  it  is  certain  that,  in  all 
 these  cases,  what  was  done,  was  u\)Ov\  Just  causes. 
 It  is  certain,  the  actors  were  in  uncommon  cir- 
 cumstanccv-^,  uIkmi  both  church  and  state  were 
 really  unhin^^i d  by  persecution,  apostacy,  and  ty- 
 ranny. How  far  then  private  persons,  or  one  mi- 
 nister mii^ht  lawfully,  or  even  prudently,  do  what 
 pertained  to  the  Estates  of  the  nation,  or  a  church 
 judicatory,  is  not  safe  for  us  to  judge,  unless  we 
 were  certain  we  had  an  equal  measure  of  the  direct- 
 ing Spirit  of  God.  It  is  certain,  the  nations  of  Eng- 
 land and  Scotland,  about  eight  years  after,  prac- 
 tically aj)proved  the  rejection  of  Charles's  tyran- 
 nical authority  ;  and  that  God,  in  his  providence, 
 appeared  to  approve  that  excommunication,  in 
 the  miserable  ends  of  those  that  were  laid  under 
 it,  as  Cargil  had  foretold. 
 
 Meanwhile,  multitudes  of  gentlemen  were  for- 
 feited in  their  absence,  for  their  supposed  ac- 
 cession to  the  rising  at  Bothwel.  The  soldiers 
 killed  or  took  prisoners  the  outlaws  wherever 
 they  could  find  them;  and  if  a  person  was  but  ob- 
 served with  a  Bible  or  other  good  book  in  his 
 liand,  he  was  in  danger  of  iiis  life. — At  Air's  moss, 
 in  Kyle,  Bruce,  with  about  a  hundred  and  twenty 
 dragoons,  attacked  about  forty  suflVrers,  and  kill- 
 ed nine,  among  whom  was  Richard  Cameron,  a 
 ])reacher,  and  his  brotherlMichael,  and  tookHack- 
 stoun  of  Bathillet,  and  others  prisoners.  After 
 much  torture,  llackstoun  was  condemned,  hang- 
 ed with  uncommon  cruelty,  and,  before  he  was 
 dead,  ins  heart  was  taken  out  by  the  hangman, 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  343 
 
 and  held  up,  on  the  point  of  a  knife,  on  all  the 
 sides  of  the  scaflbld,and  then  burnt;  and  after  that, 
 his  head  fixed  on  the  Nether  Bow,  with  iNIr.  Ca- 
 meron's and  others,  and  one  quarter  of  his  body 
 fixed  up  at  St.  Andrew's,  a  second  at  Burntisland, 
 a  third  at  Leith,  and  a  fourth  at  Glasgow. — Be- 
 fore now,  the  managers  had  scarcely  stuck  at  any 
 thing  false,  unjust,  l3ase,  or  barbarous.  Notwith- 
 standing their  marking  of  it  in  their  register  of 
 council,  Rothes,  Lauderdale,  and  Halton,  his  bro- 
 ther, and  Archbishop  Sliarp,  liad  perjuriousiy  de- 
 poned against  James  Mitchel,  that  they  had  never 
 given  him  a  promise  upon  of  his  life,  condition  of 
 his  candidly  acknowledging  that  he  discharged  a 
 pistol  at  Archbishop  Sharp,  several  years  before  his 
 death. — When  they  could  not  find  witnesses,  they 
 tortured  people  to  force  them  to  confess  what 
 they  pleased.  They  falsely  marked  the  acknow- 
 ledgments they  made.  If  they  could  find  nothing- 
 else,  they  required  them  to  take  some  of  their  un- 
 hallowed oaths,  bonds,  or  declarations,  that  either 
 compliance  might  wound  their  conscience,  and 
 divide  them  from  their  fellow  sufferers,  or  their 
 refusal  might  be  a  handle  for  fining,  imprison- 
 ment, banishment,  forfeiture,  confiscation  of 
 goods,  or  the  like.  Their  servants  in  the  army 
 acted  up  to  their  heart's  content,  in  oppressing 
 the  people,  till  the  whole  of  Scotland,  southward 
 of  the  river  Tay,  was  generally  rendered  absolute- 
 ly miserable  by  plunder,  oppression,  and  blood- 
 shed, kc.  Hut  when  the  Duke  of  York,  a  zea- 
 lous Pai)ist,  little  better  than  banished  from  Eng- 
 land, came  into  Scotland,  in  16'81,  he  rendered 
 the  persecution  hotter  than  ever.  No  less  than 
 twenty  men  and  women  were  iormally  condemn- 
 
S4fi  A  COMPKNDfOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 cd  and  executed,  of  which  Mr.  Cargil  was  one, 
 in  this  one  year,  for  cleavinj^  to  Christ. 
 
 The  Parliament  sitting  down  on  the  28tb  of 
 July,  after  a  cold  ratification  of  all  former  laws 
 relative  to  religion,  asserted,  That  the  Kings  of 
 thisrealnideiive  their  royal  power  from  God  alone, 
 and  succeed  lineally  thereto,  accordin^,^  to  their 
 known  dei;Tees  of  proximity  of  blood  ;  and  that 
 none  can  attempt  to  alter  or  divert  it,  without  in- 
 volving the  nation  in  perjury  and  rebellion,  and 
 exposing  them  to  all  the  fatal  and  dreadful  con- 
 sequences of  a  civil  war.  They  next  offered  a 
 new  supply  to  the  King,  in  order  to  support  his 
 army  in  bearing  down  field  conventicles,  and 
 doubled  the  fines  for  attending  them  :  and 
 burgesses,  besides  their  former  fines,  were  to 
 lose  burgesship,  and  be  banished  from  the 
 town.  I'his  Parliament  also  formed  a  Tkst  for 
 all  that  should  be  capable  of  any  office  in  church 
 or  state,  or  of  electing  or  being  elected  members 
 of  Parliament,  and  from  which  none  but  the 
 King's  lawful  sons  and  brothers  were  exempted ; 
 in  which  they  solemnly  swore.  That  they  owned 
 and  professed  the  true  Protestant  religion  con- 
 tained in  the  old  Scotch  Confession  of  Faiths  and 
 believed  it  to  be  founded  on  the  written  word  of 
 God,  and  that  they  should  adhere  to  it  in  all  the 
 days  of  their  life,  and  educate  their  children  in  it, 
 and  never  consent  to  any  alteration  contrary  to 
 it; — and  renounced  all  Popish  ami  fanatical  prin- 
 ciples contrary  to,  or  inconsistent  \\  ith  said  Pro- 
 testant religion  and  Confession  of  Faith  ; — and 
 swore  and  affirmed,  Hiat  Charles  II.  is  the  only 
 supreme  governor  of  this  realm,  and  in  all  causes 
 ccclcsiasttctd  as  well  as  civil; — and  promised  to 
 assist  and  defend  all  rights,  jurisdictions,  prero- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  34^ 
 
 '^gatives,  privileges,  pre-eminencies,  and  authori- 
 ties belonging  to  him,  his  heirs  and  lawful  suc- 
 cessors ; — and  further  affirmed  and  swore,  that 
 they  judged  it  unlawful  for  subjects,  upon  any 
 pretence  whatsoever,  to  enter  into  covenants  or 
 leagues,  or  to  convocate  or  assemble  in  any  meet- 
 ing, to  consult  or  determine  in  any  matter  of  state, 
 civil  or  ecclesiastical,  without  his  Majeslifs  com- 
 mand, or  exj^ress  licence^  or  to  take  up  arms  against 
 him,  or  any  commissioned  by  him,  and  that  they 
 should  never  so  rise  in  arms,  or  enter  into  such  co- 
 venants or  assemblies;  and  that  there  lieth  no  ob- 
 ligation upon  them,  from  the  national  covenant, or 
 solemn  league,  or  any  other  manner  of  way  whatso- 
 ever, to  endeavour  any  alteration  in  the  govern- 
 ment either  of  church  or  state,  as  it  is  now  estab- 
 lished by  the  laws  of  this  kingdom  ;  and  that  they 
 shall,  to  their  utmost,  defend,  assist,  and  main- 
 tain his  Majesty's  jurisdiction,  aforesaid,  against 
 all  deadly,  and  shall  never  decline  his  Majesty's 
 powerandjurisdiction,  as  they  shall  answer  to  God. 
 This  oath  was  a  medley  of  Popery,  Prelacy, 
 Erastianism,  and  self-contradiction.  After  swear- 
 ing to  the  Protestant  religion,  the  sole  headship 
 of  Christ  oyer  his  church,  and  the  duty  of  subjects 
 to  repress  tyranny,  and  defend  and  save  the  lives 
 of  oppressed  innocents  from  tyrants,  the  nation- 
 al covenant,  that  great  bulwark  against  Popery, 
 is  renounced,  the  utmost  extent  of  the  King's 
 absolute  supremacy  over  both  church  and  state 
 sworn  to,  and  the  bringing  in  of  a  P()[)ish  succes- 
 sor— and  all  taking  up  arms  in  self-defence, 
 against  the  King  or  his  officers,  or  doing  any 
 thing  for  rendering  the  government  of  cither 
 church  or  state  more  perfect,  is  abjured.  .^lany 
 of  the  curates  themselves  exceedingly  scrupled 
 at  it.     But,  by  an  act  of  council,  which  had  no 
 
346  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OP    THE 
 
 power  to  explain  an  oath  imposed  by  Parliament, 
 especially  one  which  the  taker  swore  that  he 
 took  in  the  lilcral  sense  of  the  words,  declaring, 
 That  the  oath  did  not  bind  to  every  particular 
 article  i){'  the  confession,  but  only  in  so  far  as  it 
 contained  the  do(  trine  upon  which  the  Protes- 
 tant churches  had  settled  the  reformation — and 
 that  the  tkst  did  not  cut  off  such  rights  as  the 
 jiriniitive  church  enjoyed  for  three  hundred  years 
 after  Christ — and  assuring*,  that  the  King  never 
 intended  to  change  the  government  of  the  church, 
 all  of  them,  except  about  eighty,  swallowed  it, 
 rather  than  lose  their  stipends,  and  expose  them- 
 selves to  persecution.  The  conform  ministers 
 of  Aberdeen  drew  up  several  queries  against 
 it,  importing  that  they  knew  not  how  to  swear, 
 that  the  said  confession  is  the  true  standard 
 of  the  Protestant  religion,  which  forbids  re- 
 sistance of  magistrates,  only  while  they  pass 
 not  over  the  bounds  of  their  office,  and  declares 
 the  bearing  down  of  fyranny  a  good  work,  and  yet 
 abjure  all  resistance  of  magistrates  on  whatever 
 pretence  ;  or,  to  swear  that  the  King  is  the  only 
 supreme  governor  over  all  persons,  in  all  causes, 
 when  the  said  confession  obliged  them  to  believe, 
 that  Jesus  Christ  is  the  onlij  head  of  the  church  ; 
 or,  how  to  believe  the  present  established  govern- 
 ment of  the  church  to  be  of  divine  and  apostolical 
 authority,  and  yet  that  the  King  had  power  to  al- 
 ter it  at  his  pleasure  ;  or  to  swear  to  it,  if  it  was 
 so  indifterent,  as  that  he  might  change  it  at  his 
 pleasure  ;  or,  how  to  swear  to  defend  all  the 
 King's  privileges,  and  prerogatives,  before  they 
 bad  considered  and  found  them  Jill  consistent 
 with  ihQ  principles  of  religion  y — or,  how  to  abjure, 
 as  vnlanfd,  all  entering  into  covenants  without 
 the  King's  consent,  when  it  was  certainly  lawful 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  3i7 
 
 to  enter  into  a  covenant  with  Christ,  or  witli 
 one  another,  for  casting  off  the  yoke  of  heathen- 
 ism or  Poj3ery,  even  contrary  to  the  command 
 of  earthly  Sovereigns  ; — or,  to  abjure,  as  vnlaw- 
 fid,  all  mcelings  of  subjects  to  consult  or  deter- 
 mine in  all  matters  of  state,  civil  or  ecclesiastical, 
 as  these  comprehend  all  meetings  for  the  worship 
 of  God,  or  ordinary  exercise  of  discipline  ;  or,  to 
 swear,  that  they  were  under  no  obligations  to  en- 
 deavour any  alteration  of  the  government  in 
 church  or  state,  unless  they  were  certain  that  tlie 
 constitution  was  absolutely  perfect,  and  suited 
 to  every  circumstantiated  case,  contrary  to  said 
 Confession  of  Faith — This  opposition  of  the  cu- 
 rates exposed  them  to  no  small  trouble  and  ha- 
 rassment, and  about  twenty  of  them  were  oblig- 
 ed to  quit  their  charges. 
 
 The  Duke  of  Hamilton,  the  Duchess  of  Rothes, 
 whose  husband  had  lately  died  under  great  hor- 
 ror, amidst  the  prayers  of  her  Presbyterian  mini- 
 sters, Hopeton,  and  several  other  persons  of  rank^ 
 also  declined  taking  this  tkst.  The  Duke  of 
 Queensberry  was  allowed  to  take  it,  with  an  ex- 
 plication. The  Earl  of  Argyle,  being,  through 
 the  hatred  of  the  Duke  of  York,  required  to  take 
 it  again  and  again,  a  month  before  the  time  pre- 
 j^cribed  by  law,  ventured  to  take  it  with  this  ex- 
 l)lication,  as  far  as  consistent  rcith  itsclj]  and  iviih 
 the  Protestant  religion  and  his  loyalty  to  the  King. 
 For  this  he  was  immediately  prosecuted,  as  a  de- 
 praver of  the  King's  laws,  and  condemned  to  death 
 as  a  traitor.  But  he  escaped  from  prison,  and 
 (led  to  Holland — while  not  a  few  others,  who 
 refused  this  test,  were  turned  out  from  their 
 civil  offices,  and  these  fdled  with  such  as  York 
 and  his  party  thought  sufficiently  disposed  to  op- 
 
3iS  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 press  and  murder  every  true  Protestant.  The 
 Laird  of  iAfcldniin,  who  had  extorted  about 
 L.  100,000  Scots  from  the  shire  of  Teviotdale, 
 and  who  had  lately  got  iiis  oppressive  powers 
 against  the  faithful  nonconformists  enlarged,  was 
 appointed  sherilf-dej)ute  in  East  Lothian.  And 
 while  the  council  and  justiciary  court  proceeded 
 in  their  forfeiting,  imprisoning,  banishing,  or  mur- 
 dering work,  Claverhouse,  Grierson  of  Lagg,  and 
 other  officers  of  the  army,  held  military  courts 
 in  the  south  and  west  parts  of  the  kingdom,  to 
 which  they  summoned  all  men  and  women  above 
 sixteen  years  of  age,  and  caused  them  to  swear, 
 sometimes  under  very  odd  and  dreadful  impreca- 
 tions, whether  they  had  ever  been  Sitjield  meet- 
 ings^ or  countenanced  any  who  frequented  them? 
 and  what  they  knew  of  their  neighbours  or  others 
 in  the  parish  ? 
 
 The  indulged  ministers  having  gone  far  in  their 
 sinful  com])liances  with  defection,  and  those  that 
 were  not  indulged,  forborne  to  preach  in  the  fields, 
 but  only  in  houses,  because  of  the  fury  of  the  ma- 
 nagers against  field  meetings,  the  more  zealous 
 sulferers  had  none  whom  they  could  hear,  with- 
 out scruple,  after  the  death  of  Cameron  and  Car- 
 gil,  they  therefore  resolved  to  unite  themselves 
 more  closely  by  a  general  meeting,  once  every  three 
 months,  of  correspondents  from  their  particular 
 meetings,  for  prayer  and  spiritual  conference.  In 
 these  meetings,  which  continued  Irom  1681,  till 
 after  the  revolution,  they  agreed  upon  such  testi- 
 monies against  defections,  or  suj)j)lications  for  re- 
 formation, as  they  judged  proper;  they  concert- 
 ed schemes  for  obtaining  gospel  ministers  whom 
 tjiey  could  hear  with  Ireedom,  and  for  having 
 JNIr.  James  llenwick  and  other  students,  taught 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  3^9 
 
 and  ordained  in  Holland,  for  their  service ;  they 
 laboured,  by  representations,  to  vindicate  them- 
 selves to  their  friends  in  Holland,  and  other 
 places,  from  the  invidious  reproaches  cast  upon 
 them  by  the  persecutors,  and  by  the  indulged, 
 and  other  lukewarm  Presbyterian  brethren.  Ne- 
 vertheless, it  had  perhaps  been  better  they  had 
 dealt  less  in  some  ticklish  debates.  One  of  their 
 first  productions  was  their  declaration  published 
 at  Lanark,  January  12th,  1682,  in  which  they,  in 
 an  answerableness  to  the  disjointed  and  confused 
 condition  of  both  church  and  state,  professed  to 
 cast  off  the  authority  of  Charles  Stewart,  be- 
 cause, in  his  first  Parliament,  he  had  unhinged 
 that  excellent  constitution  of  church  and  state, 
 which  their  ancestors  had  formed  and  established; 
 he  had  exalted  himself  into  an  unlimited  supre- 
 macy in  all  matters,  civil  and  ecclesiastical ;  he 
 had  adjourned  and  dissolved  Parliaments  at  his 
 pleasure ;  he  had  fearfully  oppressed  and  perse- 
 cuted the  godly  for  conscience'  sake;  he  had  hea- 
 vily taxed  his  subjects,  and  dilapidated  the  reve- 
 nues of  the  crown,  for  keeping  up  a  brothel,  rather 
 than  a  court ;  and  had  in  the  late  Parliament  se- 
 cured the  succession  of  the  crown  to  his  Popish 
 brother,  formed  the  test,  &c. — And  they  burnt  the 
 TEST  and  act  of  succession.  This  conduct,  and  es- 
 pecially as  several  expressions  of  the  declaration 
 were  very  incautious,  more  and  more  enraged  the 
 managers,  and  the  council  apj)ointed  tbis  and  the 
 declarations  of  llutherglen  and  San(|uhar,  ah)ng 
 with  the  solemn  league  and  covenant,  to  be  pub- 
 licly burnt  by  the  hangman,  at  the  cross  of  Kdin- 
 burgh,  ^\  ith  great  solemnity,  'i'he  bailie,  \\  ht) 
 delivered  the  covenant  into  the  hand  of  the  hang- 
 man for  this  purpose,  soon  after  had  all  his  Imusc.^ 
 
350  A  COMPKNniOUS   IIISTdRY  OF  THE 
 
 in  the  Parliament  close,  which  were  reckoned  the 
 most  stately  in  luirope,  burnt  to  asiies,  Ijv  unac- 
 countably kindled,  and  unquenchable  flames, 
 wliich  did  scarce  hurt  any  other. 
 
 Thcnccforu  ard  to  the  death  of  Charles  in  1  GS5, 
 there  was  a  constant  scene  of  the  most  horrid  op- 
 pression, murder  and  assassination  of  the  saints  of 
 (tocI,  and  ofall  such  as  shewed  them  any  favour. 
 While  iMcldruD),  Claverhouse,  Grierson,  White, 
 and  other  officers  of  the  army,  and  others  of  like 
 bloody  dispositions,  held  their  circuit  courts, 
 through  a  great  part  of  the  south,  and  especially 
 south-west  of  Scotland,  particularly  in  the  shire 
 of  Lanark,  where  the  declaration  had  been  pro- 
 claimed, and  had  lists  of  such  as  belonged  to  flic 
 societies,  or  who  had  shewed  them  any  favour,  in 
 so  much  as  permitting  them  to  travel  through 
 their  fields,  and  had  not  raised  the  /iiw  and  en/ 
 against  them,  and  laboured  to  raise  the  country 
 against  them,  or  of  such  as  did  not  constantly  at- 
 tentl  their  parish  churches — presented  to  them 
 by  the  clerks  of  the  j)laces,  or  curates  of  the  pa- 
 rishes— and  fined,  imprisoned,  tortured,  or  killed 
 them,  as  they  pleased.  Wives  were  prosecuted 
 for  holding  any  converse  with,  or  giving  any  sup- 
 ply to  their  outlawed  husbands,  or  j)arents  with 
 their  children.  Such  as  appeared  not,  were  for- 
 feited or  denounced  rebels  and  outlaws,  or  inter- 
 conu^iunedintheirabscnce.  Suchasdidappear,  and 
 disproved  that  which  had  been  laid  to  their  charge, 
 were  never  a  whit  better,  unless  they  took  the 
 test,  wliich  was  ap|)ointed  to  be  tendered  to  all 
 susi)e(ted  persons  as  a  trial  of  their  loyalty.  Tiie 
 council  enacted,  that  it  should  be  held  frcaso?iahic 
 for  any  to  say,  that  they  owned  the  King's  au- 
 thority according  to  the  covenants.  Nothing  would 
 
CIIDIICH  OF   SCOTLAXn.  351 
 
 please  them  from  the  prosecuted  siifTerers,  but 
 an  owning'  of  it  without  any  limitation. 
 
 Mr.  Renwick,  having-  got  ordination,  eame  from 
 Holland  in  168:3,  and  preached  in  the  fie](is.    He 
 was  speedily  intercommuned,  and  they  that  at- 
 tended his  sermons  furiously  sought  for,  hy  every 
 method,  to  their  utter  destruction.     Wliile  the 
 seaports  were  shut   up,  that  they  might  not  es- 
 cape out  of  the  kingdom,  they  were  every  where 
 pursued  by  the  merciless  soldiers.     Every  neigh- 
 bour was  sworn  to  discover  them,  and  bound  up 
 from  giving  them  meat,   drink,  or  lodging.     In- 
 formers were  hired  to  find  out  their  lurking  pla- 
 ces, and  what  persons  were  inclined  to  shew  them 
 any  kindness.     They  w^ere  put  from  under  the 
 protection  of  the  laws  of  their  country.   No  terms 
 were  allowed  them,  but  a  renouncing  of  their 
 principles,  and  by  horrid  oaths,  involving  them- 
 selves in  the  most  dreadful  perjury.    The  corres- 
 pondent societies  therefore  published  an  apologe- 
 ileal  declaratio7i,  in  which  they  warned  all  such 
 as  should  hereafter,  by  their  commands,  informa- 
 tions,  apprehensions,  or  murders,  manifest  that 
 they  maliciously  thirsted  for  their  blood,  might 
 lay  their  account,   that  they  would  avenge  their 
 conduct  in  proportion  to  the  degree  of  it,  to  the 
 uttermost  of  their  power.    By  this  they  ho])ed  to 
 deter,  at  least  informers  and  country  ])co])le,  from 
 hunting  them  out.    But  the  council  improved  it, 
 as  an  excitement  to  empower  every  soldier  in  the 
 kingdom  to  kill  directly  in  houses  or  fields,  every 
 person  that  declined  to   answer  their  queries  to 
 satisfaction,  concerning  his  owning  of  the  King's 
 authority — and  that  the  killing  of  Bisliop  Sharp 
 was  murder,  and  the  rising  at  liothwel  liridge  re- 
 bellion, and  concerning  their  renunciation  oC  (he 
 
352  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 covenants,  as  unlawful  and  unl)inding  oaths  ; — 
 and  to  impose  an  oath  of  ahjuratlon  renouncing 
 said  declaration,  as  if  it  declared  war  against  his 
 IMajesty,  and  asserted  it  lawful  to  kill  all  such  as 
 serve  him,  in  church,  state,  army,  or  country,  on 
 all  the  subjects  on  the  south  of  I'ay,  as  the  foun- 
 dation of  their  having-  a  certificate  or  free  pass  to 
 travel  unmolested  ; — and  certify,  that  if  any  tra- 
 vel without  such  a  certificate,  that  they  have  ta- 
 ken said  oath  of  ahjuratlon,  they  shall  be  holden 
 as  communers  with  the  execrable  rebels,  who  pub- 
 lished the  declaration,  and  prohibit  every  subject 
 to  harbour,  lodge,  or  entertain  any  person  what- 
 soever, unless  they  have  such  certificates  : — and 
 enact,  tliat  if  any  heritor,  factor,  or  chamberlain, 
 do  not  bring  all  the  inhabitants  on  their  lands,  be- 
 fore the  privy  counsellors,  or  other  commissioners, 
 to  take  this  oath  of  ahjuratlon,  they  shall  be  hol- 
 den as  guilty  of  the  principal  crimes  of  rebellion 
 and  assassination,  and  be  punished  accordingly  : 
 and  further  required,  that  all  those  who  had  cer- 
 tificates,  as  above,  should  swear,  when  required, 
 that  their  certificates  were  genuine,  and  that  they 
 were  the  persons  mentioned  in  them  ;  and  to  of- 
 fer a  reward  of  five  hundred  merks  Scots,  to  any 
 who  should  discover  any  person  who  had  a  hand 
 in  framing  said  apologetical  declaration,  or  was 
 a  member  of  the  said  societies. — The  indulged 
 ministers,  who  had  carelessly  beheld  the  sufferings 
 of  their  more  cruelly  persecuted  brethren,  if  not 
 sometimes  rejoiced  at  them,  and  added  to  them 
 by  their  malevolent  reproaches,  had  now  a  larger 
 share  of  hardship  than  ever  before.  The  council, 
 in  the  end  of  1684,  appointed  all  of  them  to  be 
 ejected  from  their  charges,  because  they  had  not 
 duly  observed  their  in^triuHlons,  and  some  of  them 
 
 1 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  353 
 
 had  not  observed  the  anniversary  faM,  in  Septem- 
 ber  last,  and  required  them  to  give  bond  not  to 
 exercise  their  ministry  in  Scotland ;  and  because 
 they  would  not  comply,  a  great  number  of  them 
 were  imprisoned. 
 
 Chahles  having  been,  it  is  said,  poisoned  by 
 his   brother,  and    certainly  got  his  mittimus  into 
 eternity  in  the  Popish  form,  James  was  solemnly 
 proclaimed  king,  and  an  oath  of  unlimited  obe- 
 dience  included    in   the  proclamation,  February 
 ]0,  J  685.      But  he  was  never  so  com))Iaisant,  as 
 to  take  their  coronation  oath.      So!ne  imprisoned 
 gentlemen,  and  a  number  of  indulged  ministers, 
 were  released  :   but  the  persecution  against  field 
 conventicles,  and  such  as  favoured  them, still  raged: 
 many  were  murdered  by  Claverhouse,  Grierson, 
 Douglas,  and  other  officers  and  soldiers  ;  and  not 
 a  few  in    Elginshire  sadly  harassed  by  the  Earls 
 of  Errol  and  Kintore,  and  major-general  Monro. 
 The  laird  of  Brody  was  fined  in   20,000  merks, 
 for  having  a  conventicle  in  his  house,  which  was 
 given   in  compliment  to  colonel  INIaxwell,  a  Pa- 
 pist.    The  laird  of  Grant  was  fined,  because  his 
 lady,  who  was  in  a  bad  state  of  health,  had  not 
 attended  her  own  church  for  some  time,  nor  the 
 neighbouring  church,  at   six  or   seven  miles  dis- 
 tance, w  hen  her  own  was  eighteen  months  vacant. 
 On  March  2,  the  new  kmg's  indemnity  was  pul)- 
 lished,  but  it  excepted  so  many  of  the  principal 
 sufferers,  that  it  was  of  little  vabie.     And  none 
 could  have  any  benefit  by  it,  without  taking  the 
 oaths  of  that  period. 
 
 The  Parliament  having  sat  down,  April  28, 
 1685,  made  a  cold  and  short  act  for  the  security 
 of  the  Protestant  religion.  They  owned  his  Ma- 
 jesty's unlimited  and  absolute  authority,  and  de- 
 
 2  z 
 
S54f  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 dared  their  abhorrence  of  every  principle  contra- 
 ry to  it  ;  and  corivinced  that  no  person  or  collec- 
 tive body  could  partake  of  any  power  and  autho- 
 rity but  in  dependence  on  iiim,  and  by  commis- 
 sion   from    him,    they,    for   themselves    and   the 
 whole  nation,   oHercd  their  lives  and  fortunes  to 
 defend  and  maintain  him  and  his  heirs,  and  law- 
 ful  successors,  in  the    possession  of  their  crown, 
 sovereignty,   prerogatives,   &:c.   against  all  mor- 
 tals.    For  facilitating  processes  for  treason,  they 
 ratified  the  former  custom  of  proceeding  against 
 prisoners  in  twenty-four  hours  ;    but,  for  the  fu- 
 ture, allowed  them   to  be  cited   in  forty-eight 
 hours: — and  appointed  such  as  refuse  to  swear 
 as  witnesses  in  cases  of  treason,  conventicles,  or 
 church  irregularities,  to  be  punished,  as  guilty  of 
 those  crimes  in  which  they  refuse  to  be  witnesses. 
 They  declared  it  treasonable  to  give  or  take  the 
 national  covenant,  as  explained  in  1688,  or  the  so- 
 lemn league  and  covenant,  or  to  w^rite  in  defence 
 of  them,  or  to  own   them  to  be  obligator^/  upon 
 themselves  or  others.      They  declared  it  legal, 
 and  to  be  observed  in  all  time  coming,  that  hus- 
 bands  be   fined   for  their   wives*  withdrawment 
 from   hearing  the  curates.     They  enacted,  that 
 the  not  revealing  of  supplies  given  to,  or  demand- 
 ed for,  traitors,  be  held  and  punished  as  treason  ; 
 — thai  all  who  shall  preach  at  a  house  conventicky 
 where  five  more  thai^  the  family  are  present,  or 
 that  shall   be  present  as   hearers  at  a  conventicle 
 where  any  are  hearing  without  doors,  shall   be 
 punished  with  death  and  confiscation  of  goods; 
 — and   that  all  who  refuse  to  accept  the  office  of 
 magistrates,  justices  of  peace,  constables,  officers 
 of  the  militia,  or  any  other  employment  assigned 
 them  by  the  king  or  his  council,  shall  be  fined 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  S55 
 
 for  their  contempt.  They  appointed  all  Protes- 
 tant heritors,  life-renters,  &c.  except  women,  to 
 take  the  test  before  such  a  time  :  and  empower- 
 ed justices  of  peace  to  proceed  against  church 
 irregularities,  and  to  have  the  fines  of  all  below 
 heritors,  for  their  encouragement  to  diligence. 
 They  appointed  all  the  subjects  to  take  the  oath 
 of  allegiance  or  snpremavi/  formerly  mentioned  ; 
 and  ratified  all  that  the  council,  the  justiciary, 
 and  their  commissioners  had  done,  in  banishing, 
 imprisoning,  or  fining  the  refusers  of  said  oath. 
 They  approved  and  confirmed  the  decision  of  the 
 council,  making  it  treason  to  refuse  to  disown 
 the  Societies'  apologetical  relation.  They  appoint- 
 ed all  proprietors  of  lands  or  houses  to  insert  in 
 their  tacks  an  express  clause,  by  which  the  te- 
 nant shall  bind  himself,  that  he,  his  family,  cot- 
 tagers, and  servants,  shall  live  peaceably,  free  of 
 all  fanatical  disorders,  under  pain  of  losing  the 
 half  of  their  moveables,  each  for  his  own  fault. 
 They  ratified  the  act  of  council  for  raising  the 
 hue  and  cry  against  all  outlawed  persons,  parti- 
 cularly such  as  befriend  j^^/d  conventicles.  They 
 enacted.  That  all  masters  of  ships,  at  their  launch- 
 ing and  landing,  bring  all  their  passengers  before 
 the  next  magistrate  to  give  an  account  of  them- 
 selves. They  made  an  act  for  securing  the  pre- 
 sent council,  and  all  committees,  judges,  or  offi- 
 cers of  the  army,  or  other  commissioners  under 
 them,  against  all  pursuits  or  complaints  of  com- 
 missions or  omissions,  in  his  majest^-'s  service. 
 
 The  earl  of  Argyle,  in  order  to  make  a  diver- 
 sion in  favours  of  the  duke?  of  Monmouth's  at- 
 tempt upon  England,  having  landed  with  about 
 300  men  in  the  west  of  Scotland,  was  quickly  ap- 
 prehended, and  all  his  friends  either  apprehend- 
 
356  A  COMPKNDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 ed  or  dispersed.  This  gave  the  council  some 
 V  ork  toexeruto  him  and  his  principal  assistants, 
 and  to  transport  the  rest,  whom  they  apprehend- 
 ed, to  America.  l>ut  none  of  these  things  abat- 
 ed their  rigour  against  field  meetings,  and  such 
 as  attended  on,  or  any  way  favoured  them.  Cla- 
 verhouse,  Westraw,  and  tlieir  military  judges, 
 murdered  them  as  fast,  in  the  fields  or  their  own 
 houses,  as  ever ;  and  often  would  not  so  much 
 as  give  them  time  to  pray  before  death.  Ac- 
 cording to  order,  they  drowned  two  women  in  Gal- 
 low.:y,  by  tying  them  to  a  stake  within  the  sea- 
 mark, merely  for  refusing  to  take  the  Ahjuration. 
 — Prisoners  were  crowded  together,  almost  starv- 
 ed, and  driven  from  one  prison  to  another.  INIany 
 were  banished  to  the  plantations,  for  refusing 
 the  oaths  of  Siiprcviacii  and  Ahjuration,  and  the 
 Ti'st,  some  of  wliom  survived  manifold  hardships, 
 
 and    returned  after  the  Revolution. Though 
 
 the  correspondent  societies  did  not  join  with  Ar- 
 gyle,  as  they  thought  he  and  iNIonmouth  went 
 upon  too  broad  a  bottom,  they  published  a  dccla- 
 ration,  in  which  they  disowned  the  royal  autho- 
 rity of  James,  on  account  of  his  being  an  excom- 
 municated Papist,  and  murderous  idolater  ;  and 
 declared  their  detestation  of  Popcrij,  Sictarian- 
 ism,  and  inalig;nancij. — and  their  detestation  of 
 all  niurdcro us  and  assassinating  principles,  and  all 
 manner  of  roljbing  oi'  open  enemies  or  others,  and 
 all  unwarrantable  practices,  such  as  the  killing 
 of  the  curate  at  Carsphearn, — which  had  been 
 ialx'ly  charged  upon  them. 
 
 Toward  the  end  of  this  year,  James  began  to 
 e\«  mpt  his  favourites,  l^ipists  or  others,  from 
 tak.ng  the  7V.y/,  while  he  required  it  to  be  im- 
 posed on  all  others,  as  the  Parliament  had  order- 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  3.57 
 
 eel.  But  the  persecutions  against  the  supporters 
 oi  field  convcnliclcs,  and  against  the  parlizaiis  of 
 Argyle,  were  carried  on  with  great  vigour.  John 
 Nisbet  of  llardhill,  and  Edward  IMarshall,  were 
 publicly  executed.  Others  were  more  privately 
 murdered,  or  died  in  prisons,  and  others  scourged 
 or  banished  for  their  non-conformity.  Notwith- 
 standing Sarah  Stewart  attended  the  curate  her- 
 self, she  had  her  house  plundered,  she  was  driven, 
 with  a  sucking  child,  leaving  other  three  babes  be- 
 hind her,  to  the  prison  of  Wigton  ;  and  lay  there 
 eleven  weeks,  because  she  would  not  engage  to 
 discover  her  husband,  and  never  to  converse  with 
 him. — The  soldiers  continued  to  plunder  the  poor 
 non- conformists  in  the  cruellest  manner. — Mean- 
 while, many  who  had  been  with  Argyle,  or  fa- 
 voured his  cause,  were  obliged  to  hide  themselves 
 in  dens  and  caves  of  the  earth,  and  others  were 
 forced  to  pay  prodigious  compositions  for  their 
 fines.  About  eighty  of  them,  mostly  of  the  name 
 of  CampheU,  were  indicted,  and  sentenced  to  be 
 executed,  when  apprehended. 
 
 In  the  three  following  years,  1G86 — 1688,  the 
 registers  of  the  privy  council  are  wanting. — And 
 to  lull  the  nation  asleep,  for  the  more  j)eaceablc 
 introduction  of  Popery,  James  and  his  agents 
 abated  their  persecuting  rage.  But  the  conten- 
 tions between  the  persecuted  themselves  rather 
 increased.  The  most  false  and  groundless  re- 
 j)roaches  were  invented  and  spread  against  Mr. 
 llcnwick  and  his  friends.  These  had  not  a  little 
 alienated  holy  INIr.  Peden  from  him  ;  but  Mr. 
 Kenwick's  conference  with  him  on  his  death-bed, 
 fully  removed  all  his  prejudices,  and  made  him 
 sorry  that  ever  he  had  so  credited  these  misrepre- 
 sentations of  him.      One  of  the  ministers,  who 
 
 7 
 
S5S  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 came  over  with  Argyle,  provoked  that  Mr.  Ren- 
 wick  and  his  friends  did  not  readily  join  that  no- 
 bleman, accused  them  of  overturninjj;-  Presbyte- 
 rian government,  and  setting  up  a  [)npular  con- 
 fusion instead  of  it, — committing  the  trial  and 
 censure  of  scandals  to  men  that  were  not  church 
 officers  ; — of  thrusting  themselves  into  the  magis- 
 trate's room,  as  a  convention  of  Estates,  and  ma- 
 naging both  civil  and  ecclesiastical  fiflairs  by  the 
 same  persons,  and  in  the  same  Assembly; — and  of 
 imposing  unha[)py  restrictions  on  ministers,  in 
 the  exercise  of  their  ministry,  and  requiring  all  to 
 be  disowned  who  were  not  precisely  of  their 
 judgment  with  respect  to  debated  points.  Alex- 
 ander Gordon,  John  Dick,  and  Robert  Cathcart, 
 exceedingly  misrepresented  and  reproached  Mr. 
 Renwick  and  his  adherents,  both  in  Scotland  and 
 Holland,  as,  contrary  to  our  covenants,  acting 
 like  Papists,  who  believe  their  church  infallible, 
 — in  declining  to  hear  a  minister,  be  he  ever  so 
 faithful,  for  the  least  alleged  personal  failing; — 
 like  Independents,  taking  upon  them  to  depose 
 ministers,  and  differing  little  from  the  Separat- 
 ists ; — in  sending  over  a  youth  scarcely  read  in 
 the  common  heads  of  divinity,  to  be  ordained  at 
 Groningen  in  Holland,  a  most  corruj)t  church  ; 
 and  setting  him  up,  as  Jeroboam  did  his  idol 
 calves,  instead  of  the  faithful  ministers  of  the 
 church  of  Scotland  ; — and  in  judging  of  faults, 
 dispensing  censures,  and  making  ecclesiastical 
 laws  and  acts,  as  if  they,  tlu»ugh  laics,  were  a 
 General  Assembly.  I'hese  odious  calumnies 
 obliged  Mr.  Renwick  and  his  friends  to  publish 
 their  Infoniiatory  Vlndicaf'wu.  from  which,  as  well 
 as  from  RtiLWu-k\s  LiJ'c,  and  tlie  Minutes  oj  tlwir 
 general  Correspondence,  lately  published,  it  is^abun- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  $39 
 
 dantly  manifest,  that  Mr.  Renwick  was  a  young 
 man   of  uncommon    piety,    solid  judgment,  and 
 great  candour,  humility,  meekness,  and  prudence, 
 with  whom  none  of  his  reproachers,  for  ou^4it  I 
 know,  were  worthy  to  he  compared  ;   that,  hy  the 
 kind  providence  of  God,  and  the  pious  condescen- 
 sion oi  the  Dutch  ministers  concerned,  he  got  his 
 instruction  and  ordination  in  a  cleanly  manner  ; 
 that   neither   he    nor   his  friends   ever   thought 
 every  personal   failing  of  a  minister  a  cause  of 
 deposing  him,  or  even  so  much  as  of  withdraw- 
 ing from  him   in  the  most  broken   state  of  the 
 church  ;    that,  in    their  correspondent  meetings, 
 they  did  not  judge  either  of  scandal  or  censure 
 of  offenders,  but  of  their  own  duty  with  respect 
 to   them,  whether  the  scandal  was   such   as  to 
 warrant  their  withdrawment  from  them  ;  which 
 power  the  Scripture  allowed  them,  Rom.  vi.  17. 
 2  Thess.  iii   6,  14  ;  that,  though  they  had  reject- 
 ed the  authority  of  the  present  magistrates  as  ty- 
 rants, who  had  no  authority  from   God,  nor  ac- 
 cording to  the  good   laws  of  the  land,  yet  they 
 had    no    more    set  up    themselves    or   meetings 
 in  their  room,  than  those  who  had  declined  the 
 authority  of  the  bishops   had   thrust  themselves 
 into   their  episcopal   office  ;    that  they  never  in- 
 tended  to  lay  any  restrictions   on  ministers,  but 
 only  desired,  I'hat  they  would  declare  the  whole 
 counsel  of  God,  and  would   freely  preach   up  all 
 duties,    and  down   all  sins.       JNIr.    Renwick  and 
 some  of  his  friends,  having   afterward   met  with 
 Robert  Cathcart,  attacked  him  on  his  dej amatory 
 wformaiioTiy   which    he    had    been    so    careful    to 
 spread  far  and  near  :    he  was  obliged    to  excuse 
 himself  by  saying,  That    he  had  wrote  of  them 
 not  as  what  tliey  were,  but  what  they  would  be. 
 
360  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY   OF  THE 
 
 How  villanous  such  conduct,  and  how  shameful  f of 
 Wodrow  to  ij;irc  Jit  in  and  li'ts  Injbrmation  such  ho- 
 nour able  place  in  his  histonj  ! 
 
 While  jMr.  Renwick  was  thus  abused  by  wide- 
 spread   calumnies,   and    sometimes    by   protesta- 
 tions against  his  preaching-  at  places,  i^iven  in  by 
 fellow  sufferers,    especially   apostates    from    the 
 correspondent    societies,    Kin*;-   .fames    laboured 
 with  all   his  might   to   have   all  the  penal   laws 
 against  Popery  annulled,  in  order  that  it  might 
 be  speedily  established.     Their  Arminian  princi- 
 ])les,  unconcern  about  any  thing  serious,  and  lust 
 of  court  favour,  and  the  promotions  which  they 
 expected  from  it,  made  most  of  the  established 
 clergy  ready  to  comply  with  his  intentions.     He 
 therefore  summoned   a   Parliament   to    meet    in 
 April  16SG.    (ireat  care  was  taken  to  pre[)are  the 
 members  for  compliance  with  his  \v\\\.    But  Whit- 
 ford,  son  to  one  of  the  former  bishops,  who  had  long 
 before  turned  Papist,  and  had  been  concerned  in 
 the  massacre  of  the  remains  of  the  Waldenses  in 
 Piedmont,  having,  notwithstanding  all  that  the  Po- 
 j)ish  priests  could  do  or  say,  died  in  great  horror, 
 a  few  days  before  the  Parliament,  confessing  his 
 execrable  murders,  and  crying  out  against  Popery 
 as  that  bloody  religion !    Sir  Robert  Sibbald,  a 
 most   learned   anti(piary   and  [)hysician,    having 
 been  lately  persuaded,  by  the  Earl  of  Perth,  to 
 turn  Papist,   had  scarcely  done  so,  when  he  was 
 ashamed  of  his  conduct,  retired  to  London,  and 
 after  some  months  retirement  from  company,  and 
 close  study,  became  so  fully  convinced  of  the  er- 
 rors of  Popery,  that  lie  could  not  be  easy,  till  he 
 had  come  down  to  Edinburgh,  to  make  a  public 
 recantation  in  the  church,  a  few  weeks  before  the 
 Pailiament  met.     These  events,  so  circumstan- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  361 
 
 tiated,  awakened  many,  especially  of  the  laity,  to 
 their  old  zeal  against  Popery.  Notwithstanding 
 James's  earnest  letter,  and  all  that  his  agents 
 could  deal  with  members,  by  promises  or  threat- 
 enings,  the  Parliament  refused  to  repeal  the  pe- 
 nal laws.  Some  of  the  principal  opposers  were 
 therefore  turned  out  of  their  places,  which  they 
 held  under  the  crown,  and  their  places,  especially 
 in  the  privy  council,  supplied  with  Papists.  At 
 the  same  time.  Popish  books  were  ifidustriously 
 dispersed  through  the  nation,  while  aJl  printing 
 or  selling  of  any  thing  contrary  to  his  Majesty's  ab- 
 solute dispensing  power,  or  to  his  Popish  religion, 
 was  carefully  repressed. 
 
 Having  got  the  council  modelled  to  his  mind, 
 James  continued  his  zeal  agRinstJield  conventicles. 
 j^.  100  Sterling  was  offered  to  any  that  should 
 bring  in  Mr.  Ren  wick,  either  dead  or  alive,  and 
 some  of  his  friends  were  murdered  in  the  fields. 
 Some  also  of  Argyle's  assistants  were  condemned 
 to  death  in  their  absence.  But,  encouraged  by 
 the  English  judges,  to  believe  it  an  inherent 
 right  of  the  crown  to  dispense  with  all  laws, 
 James  required  the  council  to  support  and  main- 
 tain his  innocent  Q2iiho\\cs,  who,  amidst  all  the  un- 
 natural rebellions  raised  against  himself,  his  royal 
 brother,  and  father,  had  still  adhered  to  the  royal 
 interest,  supported  the  crown,  and  died  for  the 
 peace  of  their  persecutors,  against  all  the  penal 
 laws,  and  in  the  free  private  exercise  of  their  re- 
 ligion in  their  own  houses;  and  to  take  under 
 their  special  protection  and  care,  his  cliaj)lains 
 and  others,  whom  he  had  appointed  to  celebrate 
 the  worship  of  God,  in  the  Popish  manner,  in  his 
 chapel  at  Ilolyroodhouse,  and  to  take  care  to  pu- 
 nish all  preachers  or  other?,  who  should  insinuate 
 that  he  intended  to  make  any  violent  alteration 
 
S62  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 of  the  established  religion.  In  February  1687, 
 after  recommending  it  to  the  council  to  root  out 
 the  field  convcnticleSy  with  all  the  severity  of  the 
 laws,  and  the  most  rigorous  prosecution  by  the 
 forces — he,  by  his  sovereign  authority  and  absolute 
 power,  granted  a  Toi.b  iwt ws  to  moderate  Presbi/- 
 ierians  to  meet  in  their  private  houses,  and  hear 
 such  ministers  as  accepted  the  indulgence,  and 
 said  or  did  nothing  seditious  or  treasonable,  con- 
 trary to  the  peace  of  his  reign  ; — and  to  Qua- 
 kers, kc. ; — and  to  Papists — so  that  they  shall  be 
 as  free  in  all  respects,  as  any  Protestant  subjects, 
 to  exercise  their  religion,  and  enjoy  all  offices, 
 benefices,  &c.  which  he  might  think  fit  to  bestow 
 upon  them  : — and,  by  the  same  absolute  power, 
 suspended,  stopped,  and  disabled  all  laws,  cus- 
 toms, or  constitutions  against  any  Papists,  and 
 cassed,  annulled,  and  discharged  all  oaths,  by 
 which  any  subjects  were  disabled  from  holding 
 places,  &c.  and  all  laws  enjoining  the  said  oaths; 
 and  in  place  thereof,  only  require  them  to  swear 
 an  oath,  bearing,  that  he  was  rightful  King, 
 or  supreme  governor  of  these  realms,  and  of 
 all  persons  therein ;  and  that  it  is  unlawful, 
 on  any  pretence  whatsoever,  to  rise  in  arms 
 against  him  or  any  commissioned  by  him;  and 
 that  the  swearers  should  never  so  rise  in  arms, 
 nor  assist  any  that  did  so,  nor  ever  resist  his  per- 
 son or  authority,  but  should,  to  the  utmost  of  their 
 power,  assist,  defend,  and  maintain  him,  and  his 
 heirs  and  lawful  successors,  in  the  exercise  of 
 their  absolute  power  and  authority,  against  all 
 deadly.  The  council  having  published  this  pro- 
 clamation with  all  solemnity,  returned  him  an 
 answer  approving  it,  and  intimating  their  readi- 
 ness to  prosecute  the  ends  of  it,  and  thanking  him 
 for  his  royal  word  for  maintaining  the  Protestant 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  368 
 
 religion,  as  the  best  security  they  could  have. 
 Duke  Hamilton  and  the  Earls  of  Panmure  and 
 Dundonald,  having  refused  to  subscribe  this  an- 
 swer, were  by  him  quickly  turned  outof  the  council. 
 And  the  council  was  required  to  suffer  no  Pres- 
 byterian minister  to  preach  without  their  allow- 
 ance, nor  until  they  had  sworn  the  above-men- 
 tioned oath  to  maintain  his  unlimited  and  irresist- 
 ible power.     But  quickly  after,  he  allowed  the 
 Presbyterian  ministers  to  preach  during  his  plea- 
 sure, and  so  long  as  they  behaved  agreeably  to 
 his  will,  without  taking  this  oath.  Amidst  all  this 
 lenity,  sixteen  men  and  five  women  were  banish- 
 ed to  America,  because  they  would  not  own  the 
 present  authority  to  be  according  to  the  word  of 
 God,  nor  condemn  the  Sanquhar  declaratioUy  nor 
 engage  never  to  hear  Mr.  Renwick. 
 
 Finding  that  his  two  former  indulgences  had 
 little  effect,  James,  in  July  1687,  caused  his  coun- 
 cil proclaim  a  third,  in  which  he  declared  his  pro- 
 tection of  the  bishops,  &c.  in  the  free  exercise  of 
 /^eiV Protestant  religion,  and  his  suspending,  stop- 
 ping, and  disabling,  by  his  absolute  power,  all  pe- 
 nal laws  made  against  any  for  non-conformity  to 
 the  established  religion — and  allowed  all  his  sub- 
 jects to  meet  and  worship  God  after  their  own 
 w^ay,  in  private  houses,  chapels,  or  places  hired 
 and  built   for   that  purpose,  providing  tliat  his 
 counsellors  or  sheriffs  be  informed  of  such  houses, 
 and  of  the  names  of  the  preachers;  and  that  these 
 meetings  be  peaceably  and  openly  held,  and  all 
 persons  freely  admitted  to  them,   and  nothing 
 taught  which  may  any  way  tend  to  alienate  the 
 subjects  from  him,  or  his  government — but  com- 
 manding all  the  judges,  magistrates,  and  officers 
 of  the  army,  vigorously  to  prosecute  all  guch  as 
 
 ^  .*-f . 
 
36ii  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 were  g-uilty  of  preaching  at,  or  attending  field  con- 
 venticles  Upon  this,  most  of  the  Scotch  mini- 
 sters who  had  been  banished,  or  had  retired  to 
 other  countries,  returned  home;  and,  at  a  meeting 
 of  Presbyterian  ministers  at  Edinburgh,  a  consi- 
 derable number  agreed  not  only  to  accept  the 
 toleration,  but  also  to  present  an  address  of  thanks 
 to  James  for  it,  which  they  not  very  candidly 
 subscribed,  in  name  of  their  brethren,  as  well  as 
 their  own.  After  this,  the  Presbyterian  ministers 
 began  to  hold  presbyteries  and  synods,  as  their 
 circumstances  permitted. — Mr  Ren  wick  and  his 
 followers,  who  ^vere  as.  much  exposed  as  ever, 
 paid  no  regard  to  this  toleration,  but  published  a 
 testimony  against  it,  and  were  much  offended  with 
 those  Presbyterian  ministers  who  had  complied 
 with,  and  solemnly  thanked  James,  on  account  of  it. 
 They  looked  on  the  granter  as  one  with  wiiom 
 they  could  not  communicate  in  any  such  transac- 
 tion, being  by  his  principles  bound  to  keep  no 
 fai.h  with  heretics,  and  having  repeatedly  shew- 
 ed his  treachery  and  dis^iniulation  ; — and  as  an 
 apostate,  bigotted,  and  excommunicated  Papist, 
 and,  as  such,  under  the  curse  of  Christ,  as  well 
 as  under  the  imprecations  of  his  grandfather,  who 
 wished  the  curse  of  God  to  fall  uj)on  such  of  his 
 posterity  as  should,  at  any  time,  turn  Papists. 
 They  looked  on  him  as  no  magistrate  ;  but,  by 
 the  laws  of  the  land,  incapable  of  government, 
 liaving  neither  given,  nor  being  capable  to  give 
 the  security  required  by  the  coronation  oath. 
 They  looked  on  the  toleration  itself,  as  plainly 
 proc(  edmg  from  his  usurpation  of  an  absolute  and 
 unlimited  power,  inconsistent  with  the  law  of 
 (tOcI  and  liberties  of  mankind  ;  that  it  implied  in 
 it  a  dispensation  of  all  the  penal  laws  against  Pa- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  S65 
 
 pists,  and  its  proper  tendency  was  to  introduce  a 
 lawless  loyalty,  establish  royal  tyranny,  and  unite 
 the  hearts  of  Protestants  to  Papists  as  safe  neiujh- 
 bours.  They  observed,  that,  by  means  of  it,  Pa- 
 pists were  encouraged,  their  numbers  increased, 
 and  the  executive  power  lodg-ed  in  their  hands, 
 &c.  They  considered  it  as  dishonourable  to  the 
 cause  of  Christ,  to  be  merely  tolerated  under  the 
 notion  of  a  crime,  and  the  exercise  of  it  clogged 
 with  unlawful  restrictions  of  speaking  nothing* 
 against  Popery,  Prelacy,  or  absolute  power  of 
 Kings.  They  looked  on  it  as  extending  not  only 
 to  archbishops  and  bishops,  but  to  all  Quakers 
 and  Papists,  and  so  opening  a  door  for  all  blas- 
 phemy and  idolatry. — They  looked  on  the  accep- 
 tance of  it  as  a  scandal,  which  could  not  but  of- 
 fend the  generation  of  the  righteous.  They  con- 
 sidered the  addresses  of  thanks  made  on  this  oc- 
 casion as  a  train. of  fulsome  and  blasphemous  flat- 
 teries, to  the  dishonour  of  God,  the  reproach  of 
 his  cause,  the  betraying  of  the  church,  the  hurt 
 of  the  nation,  and  the  exposing  of  the  addressers 
 to  contempt.  With  respect  to  the  ministers'  ad- 
 dress above  mentioned,  they  observed,  how  con- 
 trary it  was  to  Presbyterian  principles  to  congra- 
 tulate an  antichristian  usurper,  for  undermining 
 religion  and  overturning  laws  and  liberties  ; — to 
 justify  the  abrogation  of  the  national  covenants, 
 in  giving  tlianks  for  a  liberty,  by  which  ijll  tiie 
 laws  confirming  them,  or  confirmed  in  thetn,  are 
 cassed  and  disabled; — to  thank  their  King  for 
 opening  a  door  for  bringing  in  Poju-ry,  which,  by 
 their  solemn  covenants  with  (iod,  they  were  deep- 
 ly engaged  to  extirpate.  Thus,  like  the  body  of 
 the  English  dissenters,  Renwick  and  his  friends 
 had  no  freedom  to  accept   ut   liberty,   at  the  e\- 
 
S66  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 pense  of  the  free  introduction  of  Popery,  and  the 
 enslaving  of  their  nation.  They  also  solemnly  assert- 
 ed the  perpetual  obligation  of  the  national  covenant 
 and  solemn  league ;  and  the  propriety  of  keeping 
 up  field  meetings  for  gospel  ordinances,  as  a  re- 
 taining of  that  liberty  which  Christ  had  given, 
 whether  magistrates  will  or  not; — as  a  publ'C 
 testimony  against  the  public  dishonours  done  to 
 Christ ;  as  a  testimony  against  the  Popish  tolera- 
 tion, and  as  a  public  testimony  for  the  headship 
 of  Jesus  Christ  alone,  in  opposition  to  the  injuries 
 done  him,  and  for  our  covenants,  which  are  declar- 
 ed criminal  by  the  same  law  which  prohibits  these 
 meetings ; — and  in  order  to  prevent  the  discou- 
 ragement of  friends  to  a  covenanted  work  of  re- 
 formation, and  the  hardening  of  enemies,  and  en- 
 couraging them  to  banish  all  meetings  out  of  the 
 land. 
 
 Soon  after,  Mr.  Renwick,  who  had  been  mar- 
 vellously preserved,  notwithstanding  about  fifteen 
 or  twenty  desperate  searches  for  him,  was  appre- 
 hended in  the  beginning  of  1688.  Notwithstand- 
 ing none  had  spoken  before  the  council  or  justi- 
 ciary with  more  boldness  and  freedom,  yet  such 
 was  the  sense,  meekness,  and  candour  with  which 
 he  answered  their  questions,  and  spake  in  his  own 
 defence,  that  even  his  persecutors  were  affected, 
 and  behaved  with  uncommon  mildness  to  him,  who 
 had  for  several  years  been  the  distinguished  butt 
 of  their  malice.  He,  like  the  Marquis  of  Argyle, 
 Messrs.  Guthry,  Cargil,  Kid,  King,  and  the  other 
 martyrs,  had  his  soul  ravished  with  the  consola- 
 tions of  Christ  for  some  time  before,  and  at  his 
 death.  And  after  it,  few,  except  some  of  the 
 Presbyterian  ministers  who  had  been  indulged 
 and  thanked  J amea  for  his  toleration,  and  the  Pa- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  367 
 
 pists,  spoke  of  him  without  reverence  or  regard. 
 Nay,  the  faithful  sufferers  in  general,  at  their 
 public  worship,  their  society  meetings,  and  private 
 and  secret  exercises  of  religion,  had  generally 
 such  gales  of  divine  influence  on  their  souls,  as 
 balanced  all  their  outward  troubles.  Even  in  this 
 world,  they  received  their  hundred  fold  with  per- 
 secution. So  good  a  master  is  Christ  to  his  faith- 
 ful servants. 
 
 Meanwhile  the  Romish  priests  bestirred  them- 
 selves to  their  utmost,  to  fill  the  country  with 
 catechisms  and  manuals  of  devotion.  James  and 
 his  agents  laboured  to  cramp  the  liberties  of  the 
 Presbyterians  as  much  as  they  could,  and  to  pro- 
 secuteand  turn  them  outof  their  prearhinghouses. 
 on  any  frivolous  pretence ;  and  still  more  eagerly 
 prosecuted  the  followers  of  Renwick.  James  de- 
 clared his  dissolution  of  all  judicatories  and  ma- 
 gistrates in  royal  burghs,  and  that  he  would  main- 
 tain all  his  former  proclamations  ;  and  threaten- 
 ed those  that  would  not  comply  with  his  mea- 
 sures. To  debar  Mary  and  Anne,  his  two  Pro- 
 testant daughters,  from  the  succession  to  the 
 crown,  a  pregnancy,  and  at  last  a  delivery  of  a 
 son  by  his  queen,  was  publicly  asserted,  and  so- 
 lemn thanksgivings  to  God,  on  that  account,  ap- 
 pointed. But  most  of  the  Protestants  believed 
 the  whole  to  be  an  imposture,  instead  of  the  mi- 
 raculous eflect  of  a  vow  her  Majesty  had  made 
 to  the  Virgin  Mary  of  Loretto. — Informed  that 
 William  Prince  of  Orange,  the  husband  of  his 
 daughter  Mary,  invited  by  many  persons  of  rank, 
 intended  to  invade  Britain,  and  at  least  procure 
 the  subjects'  security  for  their  religion  and  liber- 
 ties, he  amused  the  English  with  hopes  of  a  Par- 
 liament, and  pretended  to  ask  the  advice  of  the 
 
S68  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 bisliops.  But  the  privy  council  and  bishops  of 
 Scotland,  heinj^  entirely  at  his  devotion,  offered 
 him  their  lives  and  fortunes  for  his  service,  and 
 Were  desired  to  imprison  all  suspected  persons. 
 They  ordered  all  the  heritors  to  ^et  ready  their 
 best  horses  and  men,  and  to  assemble  them  in 
 particular  places,  that  they  mi^ht,  as  need  hap- 
 pened, march  to  his  Majesty's  defence  or  assist- 
 ance. In  the  beginninii  of  November  the  bi- 
 shops transmitted  a  letter  to  James,  admiring 
 what  marvellous  deliverance  and  prosperity  he 
 liad  met  with — thanking*  God  for  giving-  him  a 
 son  and  heir  to  his  throne — and  thaaking  him- 
 self for  the  assurance  he  had  given  them  of  pro- 
 tecting their  established  religion;  and  their  deep 
 concern  to  hear  of  an  unnatural  invasion  from 
 Holland  ;  and  their  fervent  prayers,  that  all  con- 
 cerned in  it  might  be  covered  with  shame.  And, 
 as  the  Prince  of  Orange  had  sent  a  declaration, 
 representing  as  the  grounds  of  his  expedition, 
 how  the  laws  of  the  kingdom  liad  been  arbitrari- 
 ly overturned  ;  how  Papists  had  been  put  into 
 places  of  power  and  trust,  and  means  used  for 
 a  speedy  introduction  of  Popery  ;  how  the  rights 
 and  privileges  of  burghs  had  been  taken  from 
 them  by  mere  arbitrary  power,  without  any  cita- 
 tion, trial,  or  sentence;  how  evil  counsellors 
 liad  subjected  all  administration  of  justice  to  an 
 absolute  and  despotic  power,  and  had  turned  out 
 and  put  in  judges  as  the  sovereign  pleased  ;  and 
 what  an  exorbitant  power  had  been  exercised  in 
 imposing  bonds  and  oaths; — in  imprisoning  gen- 
 tlemen without  any  alleged  treason; — in  forcing 
 many  by  tortures  to  accuse  themselves; — in  im- 
 posing arbitrary  fines,  frighting  and  harassing 
 many  parts  of  the  country  with  intcrcommuning 
 7 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  369 
 
 and  circuit  courts,  making  some  incur  forfeiture 
 of  life  or  property  for  the  most  general  and  harin- 
 less  converse  with  their  nearest  relations  outhiw- 
 ed; — empoweringofficers  and  soldiers  barbarously 
 to  destroy,  hang,  shoot,  and  drown  the  subjects, 
 without  any  form  of  law,  or  any  respect  to  age  or 
 sex — not  giving  some  of  them  time  to  pray  to 
 God  for  mercy ;  and  all  this  for  no  other  reason, 
 but  because  they  would  not  satisfy  them  in  such 
 questions  as  they  proposed  to  them  without  any 
 warrant  of  law,  and  against  the  common  interest 
 of  mankind,  which  frees  all  men  from  being  obli- 
 ged to  discover  their  secret  thoughts — besides  a 
 great  many  other  violences  and  oppressions,  &cc. — 
 The  council  emitted  a  proclamation  to  prevent 
 the  spread  of  it ;  but  it  made  people  the  more 
 fond  of  seeing  it. 
 
 Notwithstanding  their  deep  poverty,  the  fol- 
 lowers of  Mr.  Renwick,  who  had  JMr.  Linning 
 ordained  for  them  in  Holland,  as  his  successor, 
 had,  a  little  before,  collected  L.240  Sterling,  and 
 therewith  ransomed  a  number  of  their  brethren, 
 that  had  been  transported  to  be  slaves  in  Barba- 
 does.  They  had  scarcely  heard  of  William's  land- 
 ing in  England,  when  they  warned  the  western 
 curates,  peaceably  to  leave  their  charges  ;  and 
 some  who  did  not,  were  more  sharply  used.  They 
 also  laid  out  themselves  to  destroy  all  monuments 
 of  Popish  idolatry,  not  only  in  the  west,  but  some 
 of  them  in  Edinburgh.  They,  but  with  too  littk- 
 unanimity,  renewed  the  covenants  at  Lesmahago. 
 'J'hey  used  what  influence  they  could,  to  iiave 
 proper  persons  elected  to  be  representatives  in 
 the  convention  of  Estates;  and  with  no  great  una- 
 nimity raised  a  number  of  men  to  guard  it,  and 
 
 3  B 
 
'^70  A   COiMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 Otherwise  promote  the  establishment  of  William 
 on  the  throne.    iMany  of  them  were  formed  into 
 their  regiment  under  Lord  Angus,  which  served 
 against   Claveriiouse   and    his   nialignants ;    but 
 while  their  junction  with  the  established  forces 
 dis])leased  many  of  tiieir  friends,   they  were  not 
 over  well  used  by  the  managers  of  the  state  and 
 officers  of  the  army  at  the  battle  of  Gillicran- 
 ky,  c^c.   These  societies  prepared  an  address  to 
 the  Prince  of  Orange,   in   order  to   have  their 
 grievances  redressed  ;  but,  by  reason  of  their  di- 
 visions among  themselves,    and  some   incidents 
 which  retarded  it,  till  it  was  too  late,  it  was  ne- 
 ver presented,  as  neither  was  their  petition  to  the 
 convention  of  Estates.    They  drew  up  a  petition 
 to  the  Parliament  1G90,  in  which  they  complain- 
 ed that  the  redress  of   grievances  had  been  so 
 long   delayed ;   that,    though   Prelacy  had   been 
 abolished,  yet   many  wicked  acts  supporting  it, 
 and  suppressing  Presbyterian  government,  were 
 not  yet  repealed,  and  many  of   the  curates  con- 
 tinued   in    the    peaceable    possession    of    those 
 churches  into  which  they  had  been  intruded;  that 
 many  acts  or  forfeitures  stood  unrepealed  ;   that 
 ir.any  acts  condemning  our  covenants  and  cove- 
 nanted reformation   as  rebellion,   and  imposing 
 wicked  oaths  and  bonds,   stood  yet  unrepealed; 
 that  many,  who  had  been  active  in  the  late  per- 
 secuting times,  and  even  murderers  of  their  bre- 
 thren, were  continued,  or  admitted  to  places  of 
 power  and  trust — and   craved,  that  these  giiev- 
 anccs  may  be  redressed  ;   and   that  Presbyterian 
 govcrnmc  nt  may  be  restored  as  it  was  established 
 in  UiH);   that  a  lull  and  free  General  Assembly 
 of  Presbyterian  ministers  and  elders  be  called. 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  371 
 
 with  full  power  to  order  church  afTairs,  cof^noscc 
 public  scandals,  remove  intruders  from  churches, 
 and  plant  them  with  faithful  ministers;  that  pa- 
 tronage, the  King's  supremacy  over  ecclesiastical 
 causes,  and  all  indulgences    proceeding  from  it 
 and  the  late  toleration^   proceeding  from    abso- 
 lute power,  be  condemned,   as  contrary  to  law, 
 and  abolished;  that  some  proper  method  be  devis- 
 ed for  renewing  of  the  covenants ;  and  the  admi- 
 nistration hereof  left  to  the  General  Assembly. 
 This  petition  was  presented  to  the  committee  for 
 the  church,   but  disregarded  by  most,   and  never 
 presented  to  the  Parliament. 
 
 Meanwhile,  another  address  was*drawn  \\\)  in 
 name  of  many  thousands,  representing  to  William, 
 still  Prince  of  Orange,  how  the  prevailing  party, 
 who  had  apostatized  from  their  former  reforma- 
 tion, had,  by  laws,  bonds,  and  oaths,  excluded 
 such  as  were  able  and  faithful,  from  all  places 
 of  power  and  trust  both  in  church  and  state ; 
 had  invested  the  King  with  an  absolute  supremacy 
 over  both  church  and  state,  by  which  he  might  dis- 
 pense with  all  laws,  and  issue  forth  what  com- 
 mands he  pleased,  to  be  obeyed  without  gainsay- 
 ing ;  had  enacted  and  executed  many  laws,  per- 
 secuting men  by  fines,  imprisonment,  death,  or 
 the  like,  for  their  adherence  to  the  true  religion, 
 and  particularly  for  preaching  and  hearing  the 
 gospel;  had  annulled  all  the  reforming  Parliaments 
 between  1638  and  1650,  and  all  their  acts,  though 
 part  of  them  had  been  ratified  by  the  King;  had 
 terribly  oppressed  the  nation  by  enormous  taxes, 
 and  by  annexing  to  the  crown  (or  bestowing  on 
 favourites)  the  estates  of  sucli  as  they  pleased  to 
 punish  with  forfeiture  ;  iiad  required  persons  of 
 all  sexes,  degrees,  or  quality,  to  depone  againsl 
 
372  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY   OF  THE 
 
 delinquents,  their  nearest  relations;  and  that  such 
 as  ref'jsed  to  depone  against  themselves,  should 
 ]je  holden  guilty  of  what  was  inquired  at  them; 
 and  that  masters  be  answerable  for  their  tenants, 
 wives,  cliildren,  servants,  and  cottars,  that  they 
 shall  not  attend  conventicles ;  had  indemnified 
 all  judges  and  officers  of  the  army,  against  all 
 pursuits  that  can  be  raised  against  them,  for  what 
 they  do,  or  omit,  in  serving  his  Majesty — even  in 
 wounding  and  killing  such  as  fled  from  their  bar- 
 barities, (Sec.  6cc.  These  things  they  illustrate 
 from  the  several  acts  of  that  period,  and  from 
 the  practices  of  the  managers.  And,  they  sup- 
 ()licate,  that  a  free  Parliament  may  be  speedily 
 called,  in  which  no  bishop  or  evil  counsellor  may 
 sit ;  that  the  j)ublic  oaths  may  be  laid  aside  or 
 rectified  ;  that  Prelacy  may  be  abolished,  since  it 
 had  always  been  a  grievance  in  this  land,  and  was 
 contrary  to  the  word  of  God  and  our  solemn  co- 
 venants; that  Presbyterian  government  be  restor- 
 ed, as  in  the  reformation  period,  and  renewed  in 
 1638,  and  continued  till  1660;  that  such  Presby- 
 terian ministers  as  are  yet  alive  be  restored  to 
 their  charges,  and  the  present  curates,  who  are 
 generally  intruders  or  scandalous,  b«  liable  to  the 
 judgment  of  the  church  judicatories  ;  that  patro- 
 7Wgcs  be  abolished  as  in  1649  ;  that  the  subjects 
 be  restored  to  their  several  civil  rights,  and  fines 
 and  forfeitures  restored,  &:c.  Whether  this  large 
 and  sensible  paper  was  presented  to  William  I 
 know  not.  But  the  Presbyterian  ministers  pre- 
 sented a  short  one,  in  which,  after  congratulat- 
 ing his  appearance  lor  their  relief,  and  apologizing 
 for  their  compliance  with  the  late  toleration,  they 
 beseech  him  to  take  effectual  methods  for  deli- 
 vering tlieni  from  the  yoke  of  Prelacy,  which  had 
 
CHUKCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  ^13 
 
 been  obtruded  contrary  to  the  will  of  thecburch, 
 and  to  the  genius  of  the  nation — and  for  restor- 
 ing Presbyterial  church  government,  and  Presby- 
 terian ministers  that  were  still  alive,  to  their  for- 
 mer charges. 
 
A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY,  &CC.  375 
 
 CHAPTER   VII. 
 
 King'  WiUiam  being  enthroned,  Prelacy  is  abolished,  and 
 Presbytery  re-established — Many,  but  not  all,  griev- 
 ances  redressed — Many  good  Acts  of  Assemblies — 
 Religion  almost  at  a  stand  for  above  twenty  years — 
 but  afterwards  much  hurt  by  the  Union  Settlement — 
 By  the  Abjuration  Oath — Toleration  Act — Restoraticm 
 of  Patronage — Condemnation  of  the  Marrow — Sim- 
 son,  Glass,  Campbell,  Wishart,  ^c.'*s  Errors — Manifold 
 Divisions  thereby  occasioned, 
 Ci 
 
 i-  HE  Convention  of  Estates  having  met  in  April 
 1689,  found  that  James,  being  a  professed  Pa- 
 pist, had  assumed  the  royal  power,  and  acted  as 
 King,  without  ever  taking  the  coronation  oath 
 required  by  law;  and  had  invaded  the  fundamen- 
 tal constitutions  of  this  kingdom,  and  altered  it 
 from  a  legal  limited  monarchy  to  an  absolute  and 
 despotic  power ;  and  had  exercised  the  same  to 
 the  subversion  of  the  Protestant  religion,  and  the 
 violation  of  the  laws  and  liberties  of  the  nation; 
 and  inverted  the  ends  of  government,  by  which 
 he  had  forl'aulted  the  crown — and  the  throne  was 
 
376  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 become  vacant !  (Tliiis  they  practically  approved 
 the  principles  oi"  Rcnwick  and  his  followers  on 
 this  point.)  And  alter  declaring  the  several  prac- 
 tices of  James  and  his  counsellors  contrary  to  law, 
 and  claimino;  their  rvj^lits  in  opposition  to  the  same, 
 they,  confiding"  that  William  would  perfect  their 
 deliverance  which  he  had  begun,  and  maintain 
 for  them  the  enjoyment  of  their  said  rights,  and 
 preserve  them  from  all  other  attempts  upon  their 
 religion,  laws,  and  liberties,  they  declared  him 
 and  Mary,  his  spouse,  their  King  and  Queen;  and 
 assigned  the  crown  to  the  longest  liver  of  them, 
 and  to  the  heirs  of  her  body  ;  which  failing,  to  the 
 Princess  Ann  of  Denmark,  and  the  heirs  of  herbody; 
 which  failing,  to  the  heirs  of  the  body  of  said  Wil- 
 liam, King  of  England.  And  they  required,  that 
 instead  of  all  the  oaths,  declarations,  and  tests,  re- 
 quired by  the  preceding  persecuting  Parliaments, 
 no  more  than  a  simple  oath  of  allegiance  be  re- 
 quired of  persons  in  places  of  power  and  trust. 
 They  appointed  the  coronation  oath  of  1567,  but 
 not  that  of  1651,  to  be  administered  to  the  King 
 and  Queen,  at  their  acce^.tance  of  the  crown. 
 They  formed  articles  of  grievances  to  be  redress- 
 ed by  the  Parliament;  appointed  a  new  military 
 oath;  issued  forth  proclamations  against  Papists, 
 who  had  lately  swarmed  in  the  nation,  and  for 
 securing  suspected  persons — and  for  a  public 
 thank.szlvifii^  to  God  for  his  merciful  deliverance 
 of  the  nation. 
 
 The  Parliament  meeting  on  June  5th,  1689, 
 without  any  bishops,  declared  their  meeting  of 
 noblemen,  barons,  and  burghs,  to  be  a  lawful  and 
 free  Parliament,  which  none  might  disown  or  im- 
 pugn under  pain  of  treason.  I'hey  acknowledg- 
 ed William  and  IMary  king  and  queen  of  Scot- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  377 
 
 land,  and  declared  it  high  treason  to  disown  or 
 impugn  the  same  ;  appointed  the  new  oath  of  al- 
 legiance to  them,  to  be  sworn  by  all  in  public 
 trust ;  and  rescinded  all  preceding  laws  and  acts 
 of  Parliament,  in  so  far  as  they  imposed  any  other 
 oaths  of  allegiance,  supremacy,  declarations,  and 
 test,  except  the  oath  of  fidelity  in  administering 
 particular  offices.  They  abolished  Prelacy  as  a 
 great  and  insupportable  grievance  to  the  nation, 
 and  contrary  to  the  inclinations  of  the  generality 
 
 of  the  people,  ever  since  the  Reformation. 
 
 In  their  second  session,  April,  1690,  they  rescind- 
 ed the  act  of  1 66-9,  which  established  the  king's 
 unlimited  supremacy  over  the  church  ;  they  re- 
 stored the  ministers  that  were  thrust  from  their 
 charges  since  1660,  to  them.  They  ratified  the 
 Westminster  Confession  of  Faith,  engrossing  it  in- 
 to their  act,  as  the  public  confession  of  the  Scotch 
 church,  and  restored  Presbyterian  government  as 
 agreeable  to  the  word  of  God,  and  most  condu- 
 cive to  the  advancement  of  true  godliness,  as 
 it  was  settled  in  Act  114^  of  the  Parliament 
 1592;  reviving  said  act,  in  all  its  heads  and 
 clauses,  except  that  part  of  it  which  relates  to 
 patronage,  which  they  afterward  rescinded  ;  and 
 placed  the  power  of  electing  ministers  in  Protes- 
 tant heritors  and  ruling  elders,  leaving  to  the 
 congregation  to  give  their  consent  or  their  dis- 
 sent, supported  by  reasons  to  be  judged  by  the 
 Presbytery.  They  lodged  all  the  power  of  church 
 government  in  the  restored  Presbyterian  minis- 
 ters, and  ministers  or  elders  admitted  by  them, 
 and  allowed  them  to  try  and  purge  out  all  insuf- 
 ficient, negligent,  and  erroneous  ministers,  and 
 appointed  their  first  General  Assembly  to  meet 
 at  Edinburgh  on  the  third  day  of  October  next. 
 
 3  c 
 
878  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THft 
 
 They  prohibited  the  vacation  of  the  courts  of  jus- 
 tice at  Christmas.  They  rescinded  all  the  laws 
 which  required  the  subjects  to  defame  or  renounce 
 the  covenants,  or  which  required  conformity  to 
 Prelacy,  or  required  them  to  take  any  oaths, 
 bonds,  declarations,  or  tests,  imposed  in  or  after 
 1661,  or  exposed  them  to  any  penalty  for  defend- 
 ing the  covenants,  hearing  Presbyterian  ministers 
 in  fields  or  houses, — or  refusing  said  oaths  and 
 declarations ; — and  all  acts  enjoining  the  anni- 
 versary thanksgiving  for  Charles's  restoration  on 
 the  29th  of  i\Iay  ;  and  all  acts  enjoining  civil 
 pains  upon  sentences  of  excommunication  ;  and 
 all  acts  asserting  the  unlimited  power  of  the 
 king ;  and  all  acts  of  forfeiture  on  account  of 
 non-conformity  to  Prelacy  and  the  persecuting 
 measures  of  these  times. 
 
 After  the  General  Assembly  had  sat  down  in 
 October  1690,  and  observed  the  first  day  of  their 
 meeting  in  solemn  fasting  and  humiliation,  and 
 had  returned  an  answer  to  his  jNIajesty's  letter, 
 in  which  they  assure  him,  that  the  re-establishment 
 of  Presbytery  which  they  enjoyed,  was  not  more 
 agreeable  to  the  inclinations  of  all  his  best  subjects 
 within  this  kingdom,  than  it  was  acceptable  to 
 God, — Messrs.  Linning,  minister,  and  Shields  and 
 Boyd,  preachers  among  the  correspondent  socie- 
 ties, in  the  south-west,  presented  two  papers  to 
 the  Assembly.  In  the  larger  one,  after  profes- 
 sions of  thanksgiving  to  God,  That  tyranny  had 
 been  repressed,  Popery  suppressed,  and  Prelacy 
 depressed, — the  doctrine  of  this  church  asserted, 
 and  the  Confession  of  faith  formerly  received, 
 approved,  and  established  by  the  Parliament, — 
 the  worship  and  ordinances  of  Christ  adminis- 
 tered in  great  purity, — the  government  appoint- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  379 
 
 ed  by  him  restored  to  what  it  was  in  1592, — the 
 discipline  so  retrieved,  that  all  ecclesiastical  courts 
 may,  without  restraint,  assert  all  the  authority, 
 and  exercise  all  the  power,  with  which  he  hath 
 entrusted  them, — Erastian  usurpations  are  abro- 
 gated,— the  church's  intrinsic  power  redintegrat- 
 ed, and  the  corruptions  introduced  by  compli- 
 ances so  far  abdicated,  that  they  are  not  in  the 
 constitution  of  the  church,  and  do  not  continue 
 
 to  be  the  scandal  and  snare  of  the  times  ; and 
 
 lamenting.  That  in  zeal  to  purge  out  corruptions, 
 — in  acknowledging  all  former  attainments  in  re- 
 formation,— in  renovation  of  our  solemn  cove- 
 nants with  God,-- and  in  faithful  testifying  against 
 all  corruptions  of  great  or  small, — the  glory  of 
 the  church  appeared  much  inferior  to  what  it 
 had  been  in  former  times ; — they  therefore  be- 
 seech the  Assembly,  that  in  order  to  a  happy  and 
 desirable  communion  of  all  the  friends  of  a  cove- 
 nanted work  of  reformation, — the  several  steps  of 
 defection  in  the  preceding  period  be  diligently  in- 
 quired into,  confessed  and  condemned  ;  particu- 
 larly ministers  laying  aside  the  exercise  of  their 
 ministry  at  the  command  of  the  magistrate, — 
 giving  way  to,  not  testifying  against,  but  even 
 submitting  to,  and  encouraging  others  to  submit 
 to  the  ministry  of  the  curates,  who  were  mani- 
 fest intruders, — Erastians  both  in  principle  and 
 practice, — schismatics,  who  caused  divisions  and 
 oflences  contrary  to  the  received  doctrine  and 
 order  of  this  church, — perjured  covenant  break- 
 ers,—  in  several  points  erroneous, — and  in  several 
 respects  scandalous;  and  while  the  hearing  of  and 
 submittitig  to  them  was  rc(iuiroil  as  an  evidence 
 of  hearty  compliance  with  Erastianism  and  Pre- 
 lacy, and  of  yielding  to  the  rescinding  of  our  to- 
 
380  ^  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THB 
 
 venants, — and  ^avc  ofTence,  hardening  those  that 
 complied  with  Prelacy,  and  weakening  the  hands 
 and  condemning;  the  sufferings  of  such  as  opposed 
 it, — and  amounting  to  a  preferring  of  them  to 
 the  faithful  ministers  of  the  true  church  of  Scot- 
 land, as  the  case  was  circumstantiated.  2.  The 
 horrid  violations  of  our  solemn  covenants  with 
 God  ;  and  substituting  in  their  rooms,  such  oathsy 
 bonds,  and  tests,  as  solemnly  renounced  them, 
 and  obliged  to  contrary  courses, — all  which  in- 
 ferred or  implied  a  sinful  confederacy  with  the 
 wicked  managers  in  promoting  a  course  of  apos- 
 tacy  from  God, — were,  in  the  sense  of  the  im- 
 posers,  condemnatory  of,  or  contradictory  to  the 
 covenants,  and  some  part  of  the  covenanted  re- 
 formation,— were  imposed  by  the  malignants 
 without  consent  of  the  church,  and  could  not  be 
 sworn  in  truth,  judgment  and  righteousness.  3. 
 What  injuries  had  been  done  to  Christ's  incom- 
 niunicable  headship  over  his  church  by  the  king's 
 usurped  supremacy,  and  what  proceeded  there- 
 from ;  particularly  the  indulgences,  the  plain  end 
 of  contriving  and  granting  which  was  to  advance 
 and  establish  the  supremacy,  and  divide  Presby- 
 terians among  themselves ;  and  the  granting  of 
 which  included  an  exertion  of  the  whole  power 
 of  the  supremacy,  in  taking  away  and  restoring 
 at  pleasure  the  power  of  Christ's  stewards  ;  and 
 the  acceptance  of  which  was  considered  by  the 
 granter,  as  implying  a  submission  to  all  the 
 sinful  restrictions  contained  in  his  grant, — 
 and  was  a  faint  yielding  to  prevailing  Eras- 
 tianism,  and  defection  from  former  ministerial 
 freedom  and  faithfulness  ;  and  thus  hardened 
 Erastian  enemies,  stumbled  real  friends,  and 
 oifended    posterity.       \.    The    late    toleration, 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  381 
 
 ^nd  addressing  for  it,  and  acceptance  of  it,  which 
 plainly  proceeded  from  an  usurped  absolute  jiower, 
 and  was  intended  for  the  introduction  of  Popery 
 and  slavery  ; — was  extended  not  only  to  Prelacy, 
 but  to  Popery,  Quakerism,  and  all  idolatry,  blas- 
 phemy, and  heresy,  contrary  to  the  word  of  God, 
 our  confession  and  covenants ; — was  clogged 
 with  such  limitations  as  exceedingly  hampered 
 the  freedom  of  the  ministry  ; — and  was  exceed- 
 ingly scandalous,  disgraceful  to  the  Protestant 
 religion,  as  if  it  were  only  to  be  suffered  as  an  evil 
 thing  ;  confounding  and  grieving  to  our  true 
 friends  ;  and  occasioned  disdainful  insulting  of 
 Prelatists  and  Papists  over  Presbyterians  and  co- 
 venanters. 5.  General  want  of  zeal  and  faith- 
 fulness in  renewing  our  covenants  with  God, 
 notwithstanding  they  have  been  so  fearfully  bro- 
 ken and  affronted.  6.  Too  general  silence,  or 
 only  ambiguous  speaking  against  the  crying  sins 
 of  the  preceding  period,  which  cannot  be  contro- 
 verted among  Presbyterians,  as  imposing  and 
 taking  bonds  contrary  to  the  covenants  and  work 
 of  reformation,  in  order  to  shift  persecution,  or  to 
 purchase  preferments  ; — manifold  forms  of  perse- 
 cution, and  even  shedding  of  the  blood  of  multi- 
 tudes for  righteousness'  sake.  7.  That  many  who 
 had  sworn  the  wicked  oaths,  and  sundry  ways 
 persecuted  the  godly,  were  admitted  to  scaling 
 ordinances  ;  and  that  many,  who  had  iiabitually 
 complied  with  prelacy,  and  borne  oflice  under  it, 
 and  had  taken  the  above-mentioned  oaths  and 
 bonds,  were  admitted  to  be  ruling  elders;  and 
 some  who  had  been  trained  uj)  to  be  curates  ad- 
 mitted to  the  ministry,  without  any  proper  evi- 
 dence of  their  repentance. — And  though  they 
 did  not  plead,  That  every  one  of  these  oll'enccs, 
 
382  A  COMPRNDIOUS  HISTORY  OP  THB 
 
 or  every  dee^ree  of  any,  should  be  proceeded 
 against  by  disciplinary  censure ;  yet  they  pled. 
 That  as  the  Convention  and  Parliament  had 
 found  prelacy,  supremacy,  and  the  like,  contrary 
 to  the  laws  of  the  land,  the  vVssembly  would  find 
 these,  and  the  fruits  thereof,  contrary  to  the  laws 
 of  Christ,  and  state  them  as  causes  of  a  solemn 
 general  fast ; — that  proper  methods  be  taken  for 
 renewing  our  covenants  in  a  manner  accommo- 
 dated to  their  circumstances, — none  being  forced 
 to  swear  or  subscribe,  or  so  much  as  admitted, 
 unless  they  appear  to  have  a  competent  know- 
 ledge and  sense  of  the  sins  acknowledged,  and 
 duties  engaged  to  therein ;  and  that,  in  answer- 
 ableness  to  the  allowance  of  Parliament,  due 
 care  be  taken  to  purge  out  all  curates  that  are 
 either  insvfficicnt,  negligent,  erroneous,  or  scanda- 
 Imis,  as  the  continuance  of  such  had  done  much 
 hurt  after  1638  ; — the  people  are  perishing  in  ig- 
 norance and  irreligion  under  their  ministry,  and 
 their  continuance  will  exceedingly  obstruct  the 
 planting  of  the  Lord's  vineyard  with  faithful  pas- 
 tors.— This  large  paper  was  given  into  the  com- 
 mittee of  overtures,  and  read  by  them ;  but, 
 in  their  report  of  the  impropriety  of  reading  it, 
 it  was  carried  by  one  vote  in  the  Assembly,  that 
 it  should  not  be  read  there.  Tiie  printed  act  of 
 Assembly  says,  that  the  committee  of  overtures 
 represented,  that  though  tiiis  paper  contained 
 several  good  things  in  it,  yet  it  also  contained 
 several  peremptory  and  gross  mistakes,  unseason- 
 able and  impracticable  proposals,  and  uncharita- 
 ble and  injurious  reflections,  tending  rather  to 
 kindh^  contention  than  to  comj)ose  divisions. 
 But  IMr.  l.inning,  in  his  picface  to  Shields  on 
 Church    coniiHunion,    strongly    avers    that    these 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  383 
 
 words  were  not  in  the  original  minutes,  but  af- 
 terwards fraudulently  foisted  in  by  the  clerk,  and 
 the  correctors  of  that  act  for  the  press. 
 
 In  their  short  paper,  they  do  little  more  than 
 intimate.  That,  after  laying  their  larger  paper  at 
 the  feet  of  the  Assembly,  to  be  disposed  of  as 
 they  should  judge  proper,  they  declared  their  sub- 
 jection of  themselves  and  doctrine  to  the  judica- 
 tories, and  promised  to  live  in  union  and  commu- 
 nion with,  and  subjection  and  due  obedience  to, 
 the  authority  of  this  church.  This  the  Assem- 
 bly accepted  of,  and  received  them  into  church 
 fellowship  with  them.  The  societies  with  which 
 Messrs.  Linning,  Shields,  and  Boyd  were  con- 
 nected, likewise  gave  into  the  committee  of  over- 
 tures a  pretty  large  representation  of  their  grie- 
 vances, the  substance  of  which  was  much  the 
 same  as  that  of  their  preachers.  It  was  ordered 
 to  be  put  into  the  hands  of  those  that  were  to 
 draw  up  the  Causes  of  the  general  Jast,  that  they 
 might  make  a  proper  use  of  it.  Notwithstand- 
 ing they  were  not  satisfied,  many,  if  not  most  of 
 these  societies,  especially  where  they  had  more 
 godly  and  faithful  ministers  in  their  parishes^ 
 joined  in  the  establishment,  giving  in  testimonies 
 against  what  they  took  to  be  wrong,  to  tlie  mi- 
 nisters or  sessions,  at  their  junction. 
 
 This  Assembly  ordered  Presbyteries  to  censure 
 the  late  incumbents,  or  others  who  should  not 
 observe  the  fasts  and  thanksgivings  appointed  by 
 the  church,  or  should  privately  administer  the  sa- 
 craments, celebrate  clandestine  marriages  with- 
 out due  proclamation  of  banns,  or  be  guilty  of 
 any  other  irregular  carriage.  Tiiey  appointed, 
 that  all  probationers  licensed  to  preach,  all  en- 
 trants into  the  ministry,  and  all  oilier  ministers 
 
381  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THB 
 
 and  elders  received  into  a  share  of  the  church  go- 
 vernment, should  subscribe  their  approbation  of 
 the  Westminster  Confession  of  Faith  ;  that  notice 
 be  taken  what  Papists  are  in  their  bounds,  and 
 how  their  children  are  educated,  and  pains  be  taken 
 to  reclaim  them  ;  that  all  celebration  of  marriage 
 without  due  proclamation  of  banns,  on  three  se- 
 veral Sabbaths,  in  the  respective  parishes,  be  dis- 
 cliarged,  and  the  contra veners  censured  ;  that 
 kirk  sessions  take  care  to  execute  the  acts  of  for- 
 mer General  Assemblies  against  profanation  of 
 the  Lord's  day  by  unnecessary  sailing,  travel- 
 ling, <^c.  and  that  application  be  made  to  Parlia- 
 ment for  altering  all  the  markets  which  are  on 
 Saturdays  and  Mondays;  they  allowed  two  or 
 more  Presbyteries  to  associate  together  till  the 
 vacancies  be  filled;  they  prohibited  ministers  who 
 had  charges  to  remove  out  of  the  kingdom,  with- 
 out consent  of  their  respective  judicatories  ;  they 
 prohibited  all  private  administration  of  baptism 
 and  the  Lord's  Supper,  as  contrary  to  their  end 
 of  solemn  communion  with  the  church,  and  as 
 tending  to  nourish  the  Popish  notion  of  their  be- 
 ing absolutely  necessary  means  of  salvation  ;  they 
 approved  methods  of  erecting  schools  in  the  High- 
 lands, and  of  spreading  the  Gaelic  Bibles,  New 
 Testaments,  Psalm  books,  and  Catechisms,  for 
 which  some  English  had  so  liberally  contributed  ; 
 they  declared  null  all  the  censures  which  the  re- 
 solutioncrs  or  protestors  had  passed  upon  one  ano- 
 ther; they,  agreeably  to  their  letter  to  the  King, 
 and  to  tlieir  declaration  by  their  moderator,  that 
 they  would  de[^ose  no  incumbents  simply  for  their 
 judgment  concerning  the  government  of  this 
 church,  nur  urge  re-ordination  upon  them — ap- 
 pointed their  commission  for  the  north  of  Tay, 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  38.'5 
 
 to  pnr^e  out  all  wlio,  upon  due  trial,  should  he 
 found  insufficient,  ncp;ligcnf,  scandalous,  or  errone- 
 ous ; — to  take  care  that  none  should  be  admitted 
 by  t!iem  to  ministerial  communion,  or  a  share  of 
 church  i^overnment,  but  such  as  are  found  to  be 
 orthodox  in  their  doctrine,  of  com|)etent  al)ilities, 
 of  a  pious,  loyal,  and  peaceable  conversation,  and 
 of  an  edifyino-  gift,  and  who  may  be  expected  to 
 be  true  and  iaithful  to  God  and  the  government, 
 and  diligent  in  their  ministerial  vvork;  and  to  ])ro- 
 ceed  very  cautiously  in  receiving  information  and 
 inflicting  censures  on  the  late  conformists,  that 
 none  may  have  ground  to  complain. 
 
 No  part  of  their  work  required  more  candour 
 and  faithfulness  than  their  act  for  a  general 
 fast,  and  nowhere  were  they  more  deficient. 
 They  indeed  assign  as  grounds  of  humiliation, 
 that  the  nation  had  dealt  treacherously  with  God, 
 and  been  unstedfast  in  his  covenant  ; — the  inte- 
 rests of  Christ,  and  privileges  of  his  church,  had 
 1)een  sacrificed  to  the  lusts  of  men  ;  the  King's  su- 
 premacy over  the  church  advanced  in  surh  a  way, 
 and  to  such  an  height,  as  no  Christian  church  had 
 ever  acknowledged;  the  government  of  the  church 
 altered,  and  Prelacy,  which  hath  been  alwaj-s 
 grievous  to  this  nation,  introduced,  and  many  of 
 the  then  standing  ministry  of  Scotland  had  sud- 
 denly and  readily  complied  with  it ;  many  faith- 
 ful ministers  had  thereupon  been  cast  out,  and 
 insufficient  and  scandalous  men  intruded  on  their 
 charges;  and  many  families  ruined,  because  they 
 would  not  own  them  as  their  pastors;  ungodly, 
 unlawful  oaths  and  bonds  had  been  imposed  and 
 taken,  and  many  ruined  and  oppressed  for  not 
 3  u 
 
386  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 taking  them ;  iniquity  had  been  established  by 
 law,  and  uniii^htoous  statutes  had  been  made 
 and  executed  ;  and  many  had  been  cruelly  per- 
 secuted f (  r  their  conscience  towards  God  ;  there 
 had  been  too  i^eneral  fainting,  ministers  not  giv- 
 ing seasonable  and  necessary  testimony  against 
 the  dtfectitius  of  the  times  ;  tiie  abomination  of 
 the  mass  liad  been  set  up  in  many  places,  and 
 Pof)ish  schools  erected,  and  severals  fallen  into 
 idolatry  ; — dreadful  impiety,  profaneness,  athe- 
 ism, profanation  of  God's  name  by  ignorant  swear- 
 ing and  breaking  of  oaths,  neglect  of  God's  wor- 
 shi[*,  profanation  of  the  Sabbath,  violence  and 
 shedding  of  innocent  blood,  shameful  sensuality, 
 mutual  divisions  and  heats,  and  reproaches  among 
 the  friends  of  truth,  &c.  had  greatly  abounded. 
 Jr  gave  no  small  offence  to  many  of  the  most  se- 
 rious, that  in  these  causes  of  fasting,  the  mini- 
 sters had  shewed  such  aversion  to  mention  their 
 own  sins,  particularly  respecting  the  indulgences 
 and  toleration  above  mentioned  ;  that  they  had 
 not  more  plainly  represented  all  these  evils  as 
 highly  aggravated,  being  at  once  contrary  to  the 
 word  of  God,  and  to  the  so  often  repeated  co- 
 venants of  the  nation  with  him  ;  that  the  seve- 
 ral horrid  abominations  of  the  preceding  period 
 were  n(jl  more  particularly,  and  much  more 
 plainly  and  strikingly  inentioned. 
 
 King  Vv'illinm  hnd  !)een  bred  up  in  Erastian  no- 
 tiou'i  of  magist; a' os'  power  over  the  church,  and 
 perhaps  also  in  the  pohtit  al  maxim,  that  no  par- 
 ti* uiar  form  f»f  church  '^ov(  rnment  \<,  founded  in 
 the  w.^rd  of  God,  but  Trcsl^yteiy.  Prelacy,  or  In- 
 dependency, beome  most  o^rccahle  to  it,  as  they 
 best  suit  tiie  inclinations  ur  circumstances  of  ra- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  387 
 
 tions  concerned.  The  sentiments  of  most  of  liis 
 courtiors  v\ere  much  the  same.  jMany  pt^rsMjis 
 of  rank  were  so  concerned  about  their  own  tnn- 
 poral  deliveranc>^,  and  gtttin<^  hack  thrir  foriVit- 
 ed  estates,  that  they  much  overlooked  the  spirit- 
 ual interests  of  the  church.  Not  a  ievv  of  ihe 
 ministers  wanted  proper  zeal,  and  others  were 
 loth  to  break  with  them.  Wearied  of  their  loni^ 
 and  dreadful  persecution,  which  had  murdered  or 
 rendered  outwardly  miserable  about  ei^ht<'en  or 
 twenty  thousand  in  Scotland,  and  sixty  thousand 
 in  England,  the  Presbyterians  were  generally 
 willing  to  take  up  with  less  than  they  wished, 
 rather  than  to  provoke  William  and  the  great 
 ones  to  frown  upon  them,  and  disturb  their  quiet. 
 Hence  the  reformation  which  took  place  between 
 16:68  and  1650  was  wilfully  overlooked,  and  the 
 wicked  acts  of  Charles's  first  Parliament,  in  so  far 
 as  they  buried  it,  or  the  Parliaments  which  es- 
 tablished it,  left  unrescinded.  The  Parliament 
 laid  aside  a  draught  of  an  act,  which  but  debar- 
 red such  as  had  been  active  in  the  persecuting 
 work  from  places  of  power  and  trust.  As  the 
 state  did  not  rescind  all  the  laws  in  favours  of 
 Erastianism,  or  against  our  covenants,  the  church 
 did  not  so  plainly  assert  the  sole  headship  of  Christ 
 over  his  church,  and  her  intrinsic  power  to  ma- 
 nage all  her  spiritual  concerns  independent  of 
 the  magistrate,  nor  the  divine  right  of  Presbyte- 
 rian government,  nor  the  j)erpetual  obligation  of 
 our  solemn  covenants,  as  the  opposition  thereto 
 in  the  preceding  period  called  for:  nor  were  .ei- 
 ther church  or  state  much  inclined  to  put  their 
 necks  afresh  under  this  yoke  of  God. 
 
38^  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THK 
 
 No  doubt,  encouraged  by  his  courtiers,  King 
 "William  laljomcd  to  render  the  Presbyterians 
 and  tlieir  judicatories  as  dependent  on  the  civil 
 authority  as  he  could.  By  keeping  the  curates 
 in  their  churches,  aUowing  thcni  their  stipends, 
 and  evtn  procuring  for  many,  perhaps  some  hun- 
 dreds of  tliem,  an  easy  access  to  the  established 
 church,  he  laboured  to  promote  his  own  carnal 
 interests.  By  two  letters  to  their  Commission, 
 and  another  to  the  Assemhli/,  1692,  he  strongly 
 urged  Presbyterian  ministers  to  proceed  further 
 in  assuming  these  Episcopalian  curates  into  a 
 share  of  the  established  church  government. 
 And,  because  the  Assembly  did  not  seem  so  for- 
 ward in  this  matter  as  he  wished,  the  Earl  of  Lo- 
 thian, his  commissioner,  dissolved  their  meeting 
 without  naming  any  future  diet.  I\Ir.  Crighton, 
 their  moderator,  remonstrated  against  this  disso- 
 lution, and  in  their  name  boldly  declared.  That 
 the  ojjicc -hearers  in  the  house  of  God  have  a  spiritual 
 1 N T u I N s i c poiverjrorn  Jesus  Christ,  the  only  h k ad 
 of  his  church,  to  meet  in  Assemblies  about  the  affairs 
 thereof  the  necessity  of  the  same  being  represenled  to 
 the  magistrate;  and  craved,  that  the  dissolution  of 
 this  Assembly  without  indicting  a  new  one  to  a 
 certain  day,  might  not  be  to  the  prejudice  of  our 
 yearly  (ieneral  Assemblies,  granted  us  by  the  laws 
 of  the  kingdom — and  named  the  2d  of  August 
 next  year  for  the  diet  of  their  next  meeting. 
 To  th's  remonstrance  ail  the  members  declared 
 their  adherence.  This  free,  faithful,  and  open 
 testi'uony  for  the  sole  headship  of  Christ  and  in- 
 trinsic power  of  his  church,  much  gladdened  the 
 heaiis  of  the  godly,  who  were  grieved  for  the 
 neutrality  and  indiflerence  about  the  cause  of 
 Ciirist  whieh  then  prevailed.   But  some  ministers, 
 
aHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  389 
 
 addicted  to  the  court,  clandestinely  apoloq;ized 
 for  this  honest  dealini^  to  his  IMajesty,  as  if  it 
 had  been  improper  ;  nor  did  any  of  them  hold 
 their  appointed  meetine^  of  Assembly  next  year. 
 Not  only  did  Kine:  William,  five  or  six  times 
 in  his  reign,  adjourn  the  meeting'  of  the  (General 
 Assembly,  and  was  too  readily  obeyed,  but  the 
 Parliament  .1698,  by  their  Gth  act,  appointed  the 
 new  oath  of  allegiance,  together  with  an  assurance, 
 sincerely  acknowledging  William  and  P.Iary  the 
 only  lawful  and  undoubted  Sovereigns  of  this 
 realm  by  right,  as  well  as  hy  possession,  and  faith- 
 fully engaging  to  maintain  their  title  and  govern- 
 ment against  the  late  King  James,  and  all  his 
 adherents,  and  all  others — to  be  taken  not  only 
 by  all  noblemen,  and  all  civil  and  military  of- 
 ficers, but  also  by  all  ministers  of  the  gospel, 
 clerks  of  church  judicatories,  precentors,  and  vo- 
 ters in  the  election  of  ministers,  under  pain  of 
 their  being  deprived  of  their  offices  and  salaries, 
 or  banished,  or  otherwise  punished,  as  the  privy 
 council  should  judge  proper.  By  their  2Sd  act, 
 for  settling  the  quiet  and  peace  of  the  church,  after 
 a  solemn  and  perpetual  confirmation  of  act  5th, 
 l(J90,  ratifying  the  Confession  of  Faith  and  Ca- 
 techisms, Presbyterian  government,  in  all  the 
 heads,  articles,  and  clauses  thereof,  they  further 
 enacted.  That  none,  who  had  not  first  taken  and 
 subscribed  the  oath  of  allegiance,  and  subscribed 
 i\\e  assurajice,  and  also  subscribed  the  Confession 
 of  Faith,  as  the  confession  of  his  faith,  and  acknow- 
 ledged Presbyterian  government,  as  now  settled, 
 to  be  the  only  government  of  this  church,  and 
 promised  to  submit  thereto,  and  concur  therewith, 
 and  never  endeavour,  directly  ur  indirectly,  the 
 prejudice  or  subversion  thereof — be  admitted,  or 
 1 
 
390  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 hereaft<*r  roiiliniiod,  n  minister  or  preacher  with- 
 in this  rhun  |» ;  jjui  ihat  all  the  curates  who 
 had  not  yet  been  assumeii  by  the  Presbyterian 
 courts,  shonld,  \\ithiii  thirty  days,  offer  them- 
 selves for  admission  on  the  above  terms;  that  if 
 they  did  so,  th'  y  should  have  their  Majesties'  pro- 
 teiHion,  unless  ti)ey  ^hould,  v  iihin  thirty  days 
 after  their  said  application,  be  proved  sianda'oiiSy 
 errnncovs,  ncghgnity  or  insufficient :  And  farther 
 ordait.eJ,  'J'hat  the  j^rivy  council,  and  all  other 
 inat;istrati  s,  judges,  and  officers  of  justice,  give 
 all  due  a  distance  in  rendering  the  sentences  of 
 churrl:  juilicatories  effectual.  By  their  27th  act, 
 169.5,  tiie  Pr.rliament  again  required  all  ndnisters, 
 Preobyterian  and  Kpi^copalian,  who  had  not  ta- 
 ken the  above-mentioned  engagements  to  the  go- 
 vernm(  nt,  to  qualify  themselves  without  delay, 
 under  pain  ol  deprivation  from  both  (ffice  and  be- 
 nejfic.  The  Parliament  of  1693,  appointing  a 
 monthly  fast  on  account  of  the  war  with  France, 
 and  other  groimds,  had  been  less  disliked  by  ma- 
 ny, had  n(it  one  publicly  declared  end  of  that  war 
 been  to  cause  Lewis  XIV".  of  France  make  ?T/5rt- 
 rafion  to  the  holy  See  of  Rovie  for  whatsoever  he 
 had  acted  against  it,  and  make  void  all  the  in- 
 famous proceedings  of  the  Parliament  of  Paris 
 against  the  holy  father  Pope  Innocent  XI. 
 
 The  bulk  of  the  Presbyterian  ministers  did 
 what  they  could  to  comply  with  his  Majesty's 
 pleasure,  'i  hey  pretended,  that  the  oath  of  al- 
 legiance and  the  assurance  were  imposed  on  them 
 as  subjects,  atid  not  as  a  condition  of,  or  quali- 
 fication for  their  holding  or  exercising  their  of- 
 fice. Hut  the  words  of  the  act  inijiosing  them, 
 and  especially  the  exclusion  of  Mr.  James  Hogg 
 from  sitting  in  the  Assembly  1695,  by  the  King's 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  391 
 
 commissioner  and  advocate,  on   account  of  his 
 want  of  that  legal  qualification,  plainly  manifest- 
 ed the  contrary.    These  ministers  not  only  frown- 
 ed on,  reproached,  and  harassed  Mr.  Hoi^g,  and 
 others  no  less  loyal  than  themselves,  because  they 
 looked  on  the  imposition  of  said  oath  and  assu- 
 rance as  a  political  snare,  disgracing'  their  office, 
 and  making  them  liable,  on  every  change  of  civil 
 government,  solemnly  to  acknowledge  the  rights 
 of  the  present  governors;  and  as  an  Erastian  ad- 
 dition to  the  ministerial  qualifications  prescrib- 
 ed by  Jesus  Christ.      Several  i)rocesses  were  at 
 once  commenced  against  the  eminently  pious  and 
 useful  Mr.  John  Hepburn  of  Orr,  in  Galloway, 
 on  account  of  his  open  and  perhaps  sometimes 
 imprudent  testimonies  against  the  taking  of  that 
 oath,  and  other  defects  of  the  revolution  cluuch, 
 and  his  preaching  and  baptizing  within  the  bounds 
 of  some  of  his  laxer  brethren.     After  suspend- 
 ing him  from  the  exercise  of  his  ministry,  they 
 stirred  up  the  magistrates  to  punish  him  with  a 
 long  imprisonment  at  Edinburgh.      lie  at  length 
 submitted,    and  was  restored   to  the  exercise  of 
 his   office ;    but,    returning    to    his   reprehended 
 conduct,  he  was  deposed  in  170.5,  as  one  that  ob- 
 stinately continued    in    erroneous  opinions  and 
 schismatical   courses.       In    J 694,   the  Assembly 
 agreed  on  a  fokiMula  for  the  reception  of  the  cu- 
 rates, in  which,   answerably  to  the  conin^and  of 
 the  Parliament  a!)ove-mentione(l,  tliey  should  de- 
 clare their  belief  of  the  whole  doctrines  contain- 
 ed in  the  Co'Jcssion  of  Failhy  and  cngagr  *'(m- 
 stantly  to   maiiitain   them,  and   should  acknow- 
 ledge   Presbyterian   government   now   sctt'td  bv 
 law,   to  be  the  only  government  ol"  tliis  <  liurcli, 
 (N,  B.  not  the  only  government  prescribed  bv 
 
392  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  TIIR 
 
 Christ  in  his  word)  ami  cnj;aged  to  submit  to 
 and  concur  with  it,  and  to  ohsei-ve  an  unifonnitj 
 of  pul)lic  worship,  as  at  present  performed  and 
 allowed  in  this  church. 
 
 Meanwhile  the  Parliament  made  sundry  .good 
 acts  for  confirming  the  laws  in  favours  of  the 
 Confession  of  Faith  and  Presbyterian  church  g"0- 
 vernment  ;  and  for  restraining  blasphemy,  pro- 
 faneness,  clandestine  and  irregular  marriages, 
 spread  of  Popery,  and  holding  of  weekly  markets 
 on  Saturdays  and  Mondays,  in  towns  ; — and  for 
 settlement  of  schools  and  encouragement  of 
 preachers,  particularly  in  the  North,  &c.  ; — and 
 a[)plication  of  vacant  stipends  to  promote  such 
 purposes.  The  Assembly  fixed  the  proportion  of 
 commissioners  to  its  meetings,  viz.  two  ministers 
 and  one  ruling  elder,  from  Presbyteries  of  not 
 above  twelve  ministers;  three  ministers  and  one 
 elder  from  Presbyteries  of  not  above  eighteen  mi- 
 nisters; four  ministers  and  two  elders  from  Pres- 
 byteries of  not  above  twenty-four  ministers,  and 
 so  proportionally  in  larger  Presbyteries;  and  that 
 none  should  be  admitted  members  but  ministers 
 and  ruling  elders.  Finding  that  the  Assembly 
 of  lG42's  burdening  their  allowance  of  transpor- 
 tation, in  some  cases — with  burghs  maintaining 
 of  students  of  divinity  at  the  universities,  in  order 
 to  prevent  the  need  of  it,  as  much  as  possible,  and 
 that  the  Commission  of  1650's  lamenting  over 
 the  sinfulness  of  fretpient  transportations,  even 
 to  eminent  charges,  had  not  effectually  restrain- 
 ed vacancies  from  troubling  their  neighbours  and 
 judicatories  with  attempts  to  procure  ministers, 
 probationers  being  scarce,  from  other  congregr.- 
 lions,  they,  by  act  (Hh,  161)1',  recommended  to 
 all  vacant  congregations,  not  to  call  any  settled 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  S93 
 
 minister  from  any  other  congregation,  till  they 
 had  first  seriously,  but  without  success,  endea- 
 voured to  be  supplied  with  a  free  object.  And, 
 for  preventing  transportation,  they  afterwa d, 
 in  their  Large  Overtures  concerning  discipline 
 and  government,  declare  the  power  of  supply- 
 ing vacancies  to  belong  only  to  their  own  Pres- 
 bytery, and  that  no  minister  of  another  Pres- 
 bytery ought  so  much  as  occasionally  to  preich 
 in  them,  l)ut  with  advice  of  the  neighbour- 
 ing ministers,  and  the  hannonious  consent  ol 
 the  elders  ; — and  that  Presbyteries  should  la- 
 bour bij  all  means  to  p?'evcnt  transportaiion  of 
 ministers  who  are  already  usefully  settled;  as 
 transportation  is  often  a  great  grievance,  and  is 
 seldom  to  be  practised.  They  appointed  every 
 minister  to  lecture  a  considerable  portion  of  scrip- 
 ture, according  to  the  Westminster  director ij  for 
 public  worship ;  that  candidates  for  preaching  the 
 gospel  be  sufficiently  known  to  be  of  a  sober, 
 grave,  prudent,  and  pious  behaviour,  and  like  to 
 be  useful  and  edifying  in  the  church,  and  be  duly 
 attested  in  order  to  licence,  or  when  removing 
 from  one  Presbytery  to  another;  and  that  no  mi- 
 nister employ  any  in  his  own  pulpit,  but  with 
 the  consent  of  the  Presbytery ;  that  great  cau- 
 tion be  used,  both  in  admitting  and  censuring  of 
 curates  ;  that  no  minister  be  hastily  censured 
 for  not  qualifying  himself  according  to  the  civil 
 law  ;  that,  in  order  to  restrain  the  abounding  j)ro- 
 faneness,  ministers  preach  plainly  and  laitiifully 
 against  it,  judicatories  impartially  exercise  dis- 
 cipline against  offenders — proper  testimonials  be 
 recjuired  on  a  person's  removal  fjom  one  place  to 
 another — ministers  and  elders  take  care  th.it  tin* 
 worship  of  (iod  be  daily  performed  in  families — 
 
SOif  A  COMPENDIOUS    HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 none  be  ruling  elders  who  do  not  make  conscience 
 of  this  necessary  duty — none  grossly  ignorant  or 
 scandalous  be  admitted  to  the  Lord's  Table — 
 and  ministers  and  sessions  apply  to  magistrates 
 for  execution  of  the  acts  of  Parliament  against 
 profaneness.  They  further  appointed,  that  preach- 
 ers in  vacant  congregations,  particularly  in  the 
 North,  should  have  a  proper  allowance  out  of  the 
 vacant  stipends  ;  that  all  intrusions  of  curates  or 
 others  into  vacant  congregations  should  be  care- 
 fully prevented ;  that  Presbyteries  carefully 
 maintain  exercises  and  additions,  by  members  at 
 their  meetings — have  frequent  privy  censures — 
 and  maintain  bursars  of  divinity  at  colleges;  that 
 the  Irish  or  Gaelic  Psalms  and  Catechisms  be 
 used  where  that,  and  not  the  English  language, 
 is  understood  ;  and  that  no  preacher  who  un- 
 derstands the  Irish  language  be  settled  in  the 
 low  country. 
 
 The  Assembly  1695  prescribed  forms  of  com- 
 missions for  members  sent  to  their  meetings;  es- 
 tablished directions  how  to  deal  with  trafficking 
 Papists  and  Quakers — and  for  transmitting  pro- 
 posals of  new  acts  concerning  doctrine,  worship, 
 discipline,  or  government  to  Presbyteries,  to  be 
 maturely  considered  by  them,  before  they  be  en- 
 acted by  the  Assembly  as  binding  rules.  They 
 appointed  forty-four  ministers  to  go  and  preach 
 in  the  North,  one-half  of  which,  in  the  present 
 necessity,  might  be  transported  thither,  if  they 
 got  calls;  that  in  Presbyteries  where  two-thirds 
 of  the  congregations  were  settled,  one- fourth  part 
 of  the  ministers  should  go  north  and  one-eighth 
 part  be  transported;  that,  in  order  to  content  the 
 deprived  parishes,  their  next  minister  shouhl  be 
 declared  iiitransportable,  without  their  cunscntj 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  395 
 
 unless  he  had  insupportable  grievances ; — tliat 
 ministers  should  preach  catechetical  doctrine ; 
 that  no  ministers,  sessions,  elders,  Presbyteries,  or 
 synods,  should  give  recommendations  for  charity 
 without  their  own  bounds ;  that  ministers  labour 
 to  their  utmost  to  restrain  the  spread  of  deisti- 
 cal  opinions,  or  any  other  errors  contrary  to  the 
 Conjession  of  Faith;  that  great  care  be  taken 
 that  none  be  licensed  to  preach  the  gospel,  or  or- 
 dained to  the  ministry,  but  on  proper  trial  of  their 
 abilities,  piety,  and  good  behaviour — particularly 
 of  their  knowledge  of  the  Scriptures  in  their  ori- 
 ginal languages,  if  not  also  in  the  Syriac  and 
 Chaldaic,  and  of  the  principal  controversies  re- 
 specting doctrine,  worship,  discipline,  and  go- 
 vernment ;  that  synods  and  Presbyteries  take 
 care  to  prevent  the  commission  of  irregularities 
 by  vagrant  ministers ;  and  that  ministers  be  very 
 cautious  in  recommending  persons  to  public  of- 
 fices in  the  church  without  consulting  the  Pres- 
 byteries concerned. 
 
 In  1697  the  Assembly  appointed  that  a  roll  of 
 probationers  and  of  students  of  divinity,  who  do. 
 not  attend  the  professors  that  teach  it,  be  yearly 
 presented  to  the  Assembly,  read  before  it,  and 
 registered  in  the  minutes  of  it ; — that  the  large 
 overtures  concerning  the  discipline  and  method  of 
 proceeding  in  ecclesiastical  judicatories  should  be 
 transmitted  as  overtures  from  private  hands  to 
 the  several  Presbyteries,  that  they  may  send  their 
 observations  on  them  to  the  Commission,  which 
 is  to  prepare  them  for  the  consideration  of  the 
 Assembly  ;  that  ruling  elders  and  deacons,  who 
 neglect  the  daily  worship  of  God  in  their  fami- 
 lies, be  seriously  admonished  or  rebuked,  and 
 be  removed  from  their  office,  if  they  continue  ia 
 
39G  A   COMPENDIOUS  HISTOHY  OF  THR 
 
 that  sin  ;  and  that  this  act,  together  with  that 
 of  1694*,  against  profaneness,  be  read  from  tlie 
 pulpit,  in  every  congregation  yearly,  on  the  first 
 Sabbath  of  INIay  ;  that  ministers  punctually  ful- 
 fil their  appointments  to  preach  in  vacant  con- 
 gregations ;  that  no  novations  in  doctrine,  disci- 
 pline, worship  or  government,  be  enacted  by  the 
 Assembly,  till  the  matter  have  been  maturely 
 considered  by  Presbyteries;  that  commissioners 
 to  the  Assembly  duly  attend  the  several  meet- 
 ings of  it;  that  ministers,  sessions,  and  Presbyte- 
 ries, exert  themselves  for  restraining  the  abound- 
 ing of  swearing,  cursing,  Sabbath-breaking,  pro- 
 fane withdrawment  from  and  contempt  of  gos- 
 pel ordinances,  or  mocking  at  religion  and  the 
 exercises  of  it,  together  with  fornication,  adul- 
 tery, drunkenness,  tippling,  deism,  blasphemy,. 
 and  other  abominable  sins — and  deal  with  magis- 
 trates, faithfully  to  execute  the  laws  against 
 such  vices ;  and  that  this  act  be  every  year  read 
 from  every  pulpit  at  Whitsunday  and  JMartinmas. 
 They  also  laboured  to  supply  the  army  with 
 preachers,  and  the  North  with  ministers,  cate- 
 chists,  and  schoolmasters ;  and  recommended  to 
 Presbyteries  to  be  very  cautious  in  either  cen- 
 suring or  admitting  the  still  outstanding  curates. 
 Finding  that  former  appointments  of  ministers 
 to  preach  or  be  settled  in  the  North,  had  exceed- 
 ingly failed,  the  Assembly  1698  formed  a  num- 
 ber of  overtures  for  the  supply  of  that  poor,  des- 
 titute and  ignorant  country,  and  appointed  twe?ifi/ 
 ])robationers  to  go  and  preach  in  it.  They  ap- 
 pointed the  above-mentioned  lar^c  overtures  to  be 
 further  considered  by  Presbyteries ;  and  after- 
 wards framed  others  for  the  repression  of  pro- 
 faneness — checking  the   spread  of  Popery,  and 
 
 3 
 
CHURCH    OF  SCOTLAND.  397 
 
 preventing  marriage  without  proclamation  of 
 banns  for  three  several  Sabbaths.  Not  a  few 
 serious  people,  especially  in  the  south  and  west, 
 still  scrupling"  to  join  the  established  church,  r)n 
 account  of  her  original  defects  and  superadded 
 blemishes,  the  commission  published  their  ^ea^o/z- 
 ahle  admonition,  in  which  they  very  plainly  as- 
 serted the  sole  headship  of  Christ  over  his  church, 
 her  intrinsic  power  derived  from  him,  and  the  di- 
 vine right  of  Presbyterian  chnrcli  government,  and 
 laboured  to  shew  that  the  church  was  in  such  a 
 state  of  purity  that  she  may  be  safely  joined 
 with,  and  could  not,  without  sin  and  danger,  be 
 deserted. 
 
 The  Assembly  1G99  chiefly  occuj)ied  them- 
 selves in  forming  acts  and  overtures  against  pro- 
 faneness  and  Popery,  and  for  the  spread  of  Chris- 
 tian knowledge  in  the  North,  and  for  that  end 
 planting  schools  and  ministers  there, — and  for 
 causing  all  ministers,  probationers,  and  school- 
 masters, subscribe  the  Confession  of  Faith.  They 
 also  transmitted  to  Presbyteries  several  overtures 
 concerning  the  revisal  of  the  registers  of  judica- 
 tories,— school-masters'  diligence  in  teaching  the 
 principles  of  the  Protestant  religion, — and  con- 
 cerning witchcraft, — obstinacy  in  scandal, — Pa- 
 pists' renunciation  of  their  delusions, — and  con- 
 cerninc:  the  makina"  and  observation  of  acts  of 
 Assembly.  The  Assembly  1700  did  little  more 
 than  form  the  last  mentioned  overtures  into  acts, 
 and  make  further  provision  of  ministers  for  the 
 North.  'I'he  Assembly  ]  701,  moreover,  condemn- 
 ed an  Apology  for  J\I.  Antonia  Bourignion,  wiiieh 
 denied  (4od's  permission  of  sin,  or  infliction  of 
 punishment  for  it, — ascribed  to  ('hrist  two  hu- 
 man natures,  one  formetl  from  Adam    belore  tiie 
 
398  A   COMPKNDIOUS    HISTORY  OF   THR 
 
 creation  of  Eve,  and  another  born  of  the  Virgui 
 ]\Iary  ; — denied  God*s  decrees  of  election  and  re- 
 probation as  wicked,  cruel,  and  partial  ; — denied 
 his  foreknowledge  of  futurities  ; — and  maintain- 
 ed, That  all  men  have  a  i^ood  and  an  evil  spirit 
 in  them  before  their  birth  ; — that  man's  will  is 
 unlimited,  and  he  must  have  some  infinite  (piali- 
 ty,  by  which  he  may  unite  with  God  ; — that 
 Christ's  human  nature  had  sinful  corruption  in 
 it,  and  his  will  had  in  it  rebellion  ac^ainst  the  will 
 of  God  ; — that  men  may  be  perfect  in  this  life,  or 
 purified  from  sin  in  the  next ; — that  natural  gene- 
 ration takes  place  in  heaven  ; — that  there  are  now 
 no  true  Christians  in  this  world,  (S^c.  The  curates 
 having  so  terribly  neglected  the  administration 
 of  the  Lord's  Supper,  that  in  all  the  bishopric  of 
 Argyle,  it  was  dispensed  but  twelve  times  in 
 twenty-eight  years,  the  Presbyterian  ministers 
 had  no  small  difi[iculty  to  render  it  as  frequent  as 
 they  wished.  This  Assembly  recommended  the 
 more  frequent  administration  of  it,  and  that  the 
 number  of  ministers  assisting  at  it  should  be 
 lessened.  They  revived  the  acts  of  1615  and 
 1G49,  against  Lykwakes,  abuses  at  penny- wed- 
 dings, and  promiscuous  dancings.  They  trans- 
 mitted to  Presbyteries  some  overtures  concern- 
 ing scandalous  i)ersons  turning  Papists,  in  order 
 to  escape  discipline, — Protestants  marrying  Pa- 
 pists,— intimations  of  excommunication  through 
 the  whole  Presbytery,  or  in  case  of  obstinacy, 
 through  every  kirk  in  the  nation, — or  irregular 
 absolution  from  censure  by  curates  or  others  ; 
 and  concerning  the  strict  trial  of  candidates  for 
 the  ministry, — and  the  calling  of  Presbyteries  to 
 account  for  their  diligence  in  the  restraining  of 
 profaneness. 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTI,ANn.  399 
 
 King  William  dying  just  after  the  Assembly 
 1702  had  convened,  they  did  nothing  that  needs 
 to  be  here  recorded.  Queen  Anne  having  suc- 
 ceeded him,  several  Synods,  dreading  her  un- 
 friendly disposition,  thought  proper  to  form  acts 
 expressly  asserting  Christ's  sole  headship  over  his 
 church,  her  intrinsic poiver,  and  the  divine  right  of 
 Presbytery  :  and  some  of  the  more  zealous  minis- 
 ters thought  to  have  pushed  an  act  of  that  kind 
 in  the  Assembly  1703.  But,  to  prevent  it,  the 
 liaughty  Earl  of  Seafield,  her  commissioner,  dis- 
 solved their  meeting,  when  they  had  done  little 
 more  than  to  form  some  directions  for  planting 
 of  ministers  in  the  North, — and  to  draw  up  an 
 address  to  her  majesty  in  favour  of  their  Presby- 
 terian government,  and  representing  the  extra- 
 ordinary growth  of  Popery,  the  disorderly  beha- 
 viour of  the  curates,  and  the  abounding  of  im- 
 morality and  profaneness  ; — and  had  given  some 
 recommendations  for  supplying  and  preserving 
 the  registers  belonging  to  the  Assemblies,  and 
 their  committees  and  commissions,  part  of  which 
 had  been  destroyed  by  the  dreadful  fire  in  1701  ; 
 and  concerning  the  Large  Overtures  of  1697. — 
 Many  protestations  from  all  corners  of  the  house 
 were  offered  against  this  dissolution  of  their 
 meeting,  and  for  the  intrinsic  power  of  the  cliurch. 
 But  Mr.  Meldrum,  the  moderator,  was  so  over- 
 whelmed with  abuse  by  the  commissioner,  and 
 with  confusion,  that  he  concluded  with  prayei-, 
 before  any  thing  could  be  regularly  marked. 
 Ever  since,  I  think,  the  General  Assemblies  have 
 been  first  dissolved  by  the  moderator  in  the 
 name  of  Christ,  and  then  by  the  coiinnisiionc! 
 }n  the  name  of  the  sovereign. 
 
400  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF    THIi 
 
 Probably  to  lull  the  Piesi)yterians  asleep,  one 
 act  was  niatle  by  Anne's  Parliament,  in  1702, 
 and  another  in  170.'3,  ratifyin^^  all  former  laws  in 
 favour  ui'  the  Co/ifcssLun  of  Failh,  and  Preshijtc- 
 rian  church  govciiiment,  partieularly  the  act  /;th, 
 1G|)0.  JNIany  had  fearful  apprehensions  of  a  de- 
 sign to  have  Prelacy  tolerated,  if  not  established 
 by  the  Parliament  I7O0,  but  the  Lord  threw  the 
 members  into  such  heats  and  confusions,  as  issued 
 in  declaring  it  treasonable  to  alter  the  govern- 
 ment of  the  church.  Nevertheless,  a  treaty  of  an 
 incorporating  union  with  England  was  almost 
 immediately  after  projected,  and,  notwithstand- 
 ing much  opposition,  carried  on  and  concluded. 
 When  it  was  laid  before  the  Parliament  in  I70O, 
 and  the  majority  of  members  appeared  to  favour 
 it,  both  ministers  and  people  were  exceedingly 
 concerned,  and  presented  addresses  against  it. 
 The  Commission  of  the  General  Assembly  sat 
 during  the  whole  session  of  Parliament,  and  was 
 uncommonly  numerous.  They  first  presented  an 
 address  for  an  unalterable  establishment  of  their 
 religion,  in  the  present  and  all  succeeding  gene- 
 rations, as  far  as  human  laws  could  go.  ^Po  sa- 
 tisfy them,  the  Parliament  enajted.  That  the 
 perpetual  establishment  of  the  doctrine,  worship, 
 discipline,  and  Presbyterian  government  of  this 
 church,  should  be  held  as  an  unalterable,  funda- 
 mental, and  essential  condition  of  the  intended 
 union,  if  it  should  be  concluded.  Many  thought 
 that  this  would  be  a  better  security  for  their  re- 
 ligion than  any  act  of  the  Scotch  Parliament 
 alone.  But  the  most  part  of  the  true  Presbyte- 
 rians still  continued  averse  to  an  incorporatinrr 
 vniou,  or  coining  under  the  jurisdiition  of  a  Bri- 
 tish Pailiament,  in  which  the  l^nglish    Prclatists 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  4C)1 
 
 would  be  ten  to  one  of  the  Scots.  Notwith- 
 standing great  opposition  from  noblenien  and 
 gentlemen,  who  expected  temporal  advantages 
 by  promoting  the  union,  the  Commission  pre- 
 sented a  second  address,  in  which  they  represent- 
 ed the  danger  they  would  be  in  of  oaths,  tests, 
 and  impositions  inconsistent  with  their  principles; 
 and  that  it  was  contrary  to  their  principles  and 
 covenants  to  approve  of  the  civil  power  of  bishops, 
 to  twenty-six  of  whom  the  nation  w  ould  be  sub- 
 jected in  the  British  Parliament.  To  this  they 
 got  no  answer,  but  a  clause  inserted  into  the  act 
 for  securing  the  church,  bearing,  TJiat  no  oath, 
 test,  or  subscription,  should  ever  be  imposed  within 
 the  bounds  of  this  church  and  kingdom,  contrary  to 
 our  Presbyterian  establishment;  but  leaving  Scotch- 
 men liable  to  such  impositions  in  any  other  part  of 
 the  British  dominions.  The  Parliament  there- 
 after declared,  that  the  Parliament  of  England 
 might  provide  for  the  security o{ ihitix  church  with- 
 in that  kingdom,  as  they  shoidd  think  expedient. 
 By  this,  they,  contrary  to  the  word  of  God,  and 
 our  solemn  covenants  with  him,  particularly  the 
 solemn  league,  consented  to  the  securing  of  Pre- 
 lacy and  the  ceremonies  in  England,  as  an  essen- 
 tial and  fundamental  condition  of  the  union.  The 
 Commission  being  informed  of  this,  notwith- 
 standing great  opposition,  presented  a  third  ad- 
 dress, craving.  That  there  might  be  no  such  sti- 
 pulation or  consent  to  the  establishment  of  the 
 hierarchy  and  ceremonies  in  Englaml,  as  they 
 would  not  involve  themselves  and  the  nation 
 in  guilt.  But  the  expectation  of  .C40(),(X)0 
 Sterling,  to  balance  the  loss  ofDarien  to  the 
 Spaniards,  through  the  treachery  of  the  English, 
 and  the   hopes  of  worldly  advantages  from  the 
 
 3  r 
 
402  A  COMPENDIOL'S   HISTORY  OP  THE 
 
 court,  or  in  point  of  trade,  made  most  of  the 
 Parliamenters  overlook  every  tiling  relif^ioiis, — 
 so  that  the  pcipetual  estal)lishment  of  Episco- 
 pacy and  the  ceremonies  in  Eni^land,  as  well  as  of 
 Presbyterian  [rovcrnment  and  the  simplicity  of  s;os- 
 pel  worship  attending  it  in  Scothind,  were  l)oth 
 fixed  as  fundamental  and  unalterable  conditions 
 of  the  union  ;  and  each  nation,  by  a  solemn  deed 
 of  their  Parliament,  guaranteed  to  the  other  an 
 establishment  of  religion  not  a  little  contrary  to 
 their  own. 
 
 Besides  their  labour  in  prosecuting  and   de- 
 posing INIr.  John  McMillan  in  1703,  who,  besides 
 declaiming  against  the  defects  and  blemishes  of 
 the  Revolution   church,  denied  the   authority  of 
 the  civil  magistrates,  because  of  their  not  taking 
 the  covenants,  and  wanting  other  qualifications 
 required  in  Scripture,  and   by   the  laws  between 
 1638  and  1650, — and  of  Mr.  John   Hepburn  in 
 170.5,  on  account  of  his  relapsing  into  his  former 
 conduct, — the  principal  appointments  of  the   As- 
 sembly in  1 70i  are.  That  ministers  should  lecture 
 a  considerable   portion   of  scripture  at  a   time  ; 
 that  none  should  be  commissioners  to  the  Assem- 
 blies  but  such  as  have  subscribed  the  Confession 
 of  Faith y  and  have  relation  to,  and  reside  in,  the 
 place  from  which  they  are  sent ;  that  scandalous 
 persons,  who  turn   Papists  to  escape  censure,  be 
 excommunicated;  that  excommunications  be  in- 
 timated in  the  bounds  of  Presbytery,  Synod,  or 
 through   the  whole  kingdom,  as  may  l)est  corre- 
 spond witii  the  obstinacy  of  the  scandalous  per- 
 son;  that  candidates  for  licence   and   ordination 
 l)e  very  strictly  tried,  and  that  Synods  take  care 
 that  it  be  so  ;   that  Synods   call    Presbyteries   to 
 account  with  respect   to   their  diligence  in    the 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  403 
 
 restraining'  of  profaneness,  and  causing-  tlic  acts 
 made  against  it  to  be  read  from  all  their  pulpits 
 twice  every  year ;  that  Synods  and  Presbyteries 
 carefully  observe,  that  none  be  permitted  to  vent 
 any  Arminian,  Arian,  or  Socinian  errors  ;  that 
 students  who  understand  the  Irish  language,  be 
 preferred  to  bursaries  in  colleges  before  any 
 others ;  that  Presbyteries  earnestly  travel  in  col- 
 lecting money  from  noblemen  and  others,  in 
 order  to  raise  a  fund  for  the  establishment  of 
 schools  in  the  Hi£chlands,  and  forminc:  libraries 
 there;  that  proper  means  be  concerted  for  print- 
 ing a  new  edition  of  the  Irish  or  Gaelic  Bible, 
 and  for  translating  the  Confession  of  Faith  auA 
 Larger  Catechism  into  that  language,  and  for 
 rendering  the  Psalms  and  Shorter  Catechism,  al- 
 ready translated,  more  generally  useful ;  that  care 
 be  taken  to  repress  Popery,  and  prevent  Protes- 
 tants marrying  with  Papists;  that  an  exact  i^^or/;i 
 of  Process  be  speedily  and  carefully  drawn  up,  and 
 great  pains  used  for  recovering  registers  and 
 other  papers  belonging  to  the  church  ;  that  Pres- 
 byteries and  ministers  see  to  the  erection  of  a 
 school  in  every  parish,  and  that  the  youth  be  pro- 
 perly taught  in  schools  as  well  as  in  colleges. 
 About  this  time,  the  Large  Overtures  were  again 
 published  in  a  more  correct  state.  They  con- 
 tained directions  for  the  right  constitution  of 
 church  JUDICATORIES  in  general,  and  respecting 
 their  moderators,  clerks,  registers,  proceedings, 
 behaviour  of  members  in  them,  and  conclusion  of 
 their  meetings, — and  more  particularly  for  the 
 constitution  of  kirk  skssions, — election  and  or- 
 dination of  elders  and  deacons, — marriage, — ad- 
 mission of  infants  to  ba[)tism, — admission  to,  or 
 debaning  from  the  Lord's  tal)lc, — procedure  with 
 
401  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF   THE 
 
 drunkards,  swearers,  profaners  of  the  Lord's  day, 
 fornicators,  adulterers,  and  other  unclean  per- 
 sons,— privy  censures  : — for  the  constitution  of 
 Presbytekies, — licensing  of  preachers,  planting 
 of  vacant  congregations, — ordination  or  trans- 
 portation of  ministers,  appeals  and  references 
 from  sessions,  censuring  of  gross  scandals,  from 
 which  sessions  do  not  absolve, — processes  in  or- 
 der to  the  greater  excommunication,  Presbyterial 
 exercises, — privy  censures  : for  the  constitu- 
 tion and  opening  of  Synods, — procedure  of  their 
 committees, — procedure  in  processes, — privy  cen- 
 sure of  Presbyteries, — and  conclusion  of  their 
 meetings  : and  for  the  constitution  and  open- 
 ing of  General  Assemblies, — procedure  of  their 
 several  committees, — procedure  in  their  own  work, 
 — appointment  and  procedure  of  Commissions, — 
 and  concluding  their  meetings. But  the  indo- 
 lence of  Presbyteries,  the  restoration  of  patrona- 
 ges, and  the  embarrassment  of  the  Assemblies 
 with  other  business,  hindered  the  establishment 
 of  many  of  these  excellent  directions  from  being 
 
 formed  into  standing  rules. INfost  of  the  acts 
 
 of  the  Assemblies  1705  and  1706  were  little 
 more  than  enforcements  of  preceding  ones  rela- 
 tive to  profaneness,  S^c. — and  for  calling  in  the 
 assistance  of  magistrates  to  prevent  abuses  at 
 penny  lueddings,  and  for  recommending  the  late- 
 ly composed  Scripture  songs;  for  giving  in  of 
 Overtures  and  References  to  the  Assemblies,  and 
 the  exact  registering  of  the  minutes  of  church 
 courts  ;  and  for  strict  admission  to  the  Lord's 
 Supper  ;  parochial  visitations, — and  ministerial 
 visitation  of  families. — The  most  important  acts 
 of  the  Assembly  1707  are  these,  largely  directing 
 how  to  prevent  the  increase  of  Popery,   and  es- 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  40 > 
 
 tablishing'  a  most  QXCQWeni  FormoJ' Process,  cliicf- 
 ly  extracted  from  the  Large  Overtures. 
 
 While  the  perjury  and  other  evils  of  the  union 
 settlement  more  and  more  confirmed  Messrs. 
 Hepburn  and  M'Millan  in  their  former  courses, 
 the  established  church,  in  her  Assemjjly  1708, 
 established  excellent  rules  for  ministers'  visita- 
 tion of  families ;  they  formed  new  acts  for  pre- 
 venting the  profanation  of  the  Lord's  day,  and 
 other  impieties  ;  they  enjoined  Presbyteries  to 
 beware  of  rashly  licensing  or  ordaining  any  can- 
 didates, whose  qualifications  were  doulitful  ;  they 
 recommended  their  forming  an  Overture  for  pre- 
 venting competition  of  calls,  or  giving  a  second  call 
 to  any  candidate  before  his  former  one  was  final- 
 ly discussed  ;  they  empowered  their  Commission 
 finally  to  examine  and  establish  the  public  use 
 of  the  scripture  songs^  which  had,  for  several  years, 
 been  under  consideration.  In  1709  they  recom- 
 mended the  utmost  reverence  in  the  public  wor- 
 ship of  God,  and  ordered  a  warning  to  that  pur- 
 pose to  be  read  from  every  pulpit  ;  they  earnest- 
 ly called  all  under  their  inspection  to  concur  in 
 promoting  the  erection  of  a  Society  for  propaga- 
 ting Christian  knowledge  in  the  Highlands  ix\u\  fo- 
 reign parts  of  the  world,  and  required  ministers 
 and  elders  to  collect  what  they  could  from  their 
 people,  as  a  fund  for  supporting  this  excellent 
 design  :  They  recommended  to  each  Presbytery 
 to  form  a  library  for  itself,  out  of  the  books  sent 
 by  friends  from  England,  and  such  others  as  they 
 could  obtain.  They,  as  had  been  repeatedly 
 done  beibre,  retpiired  Presbyteries  carefully  to 
 examine  the  Large  Overtures^  that  they  m'ght 
 !iave  them  si)eedily  established  as  a  rttmphte  di- 
 rectors lor  their  judicial  prdcedurc. — The  A>>em- 
 
i()()  A   COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY   OF  THE 
 
 Illy  1710  fornuHl  sotnc  new  overtures  for  pre- 
 venting' the  JiccMisini^  of  too  many,  or  unciualilied 
 preachers.  They  reipiired  all  general  fasts,  ap- 
 l)ointe(l  by  either  church  or  state,  for  just  and 
 necessary  causes,  to  be  duly  observed.  1  hey  ap- 
 pointed all  ministers  in  whose  bounds  Bourignian 
 errors  are  spreading,  to  preach  particularly  and 
 faithfully  against  them;  and  all  Presbyteries  in 
 whose  bounds  they  are  vented,  carefully  to  cause 
 all  schoolmasters,  teachers,  chaplains,  and  gover- 
 nors of  youth  to  subscribe  the  Conjessioii  of  Falih 
 as  the  confession  of  their  faith ;  and  that  no  heri- 
 tors or  heads  of  families  retain  in  such  stations 
 any  that  refuse  their  subscription  :  that  Presby- 
 teries transmit  to  the  Commission  an  exact  and 
 full  account  of  the  principal  propagators  of  these 
 errors,  and  the  professors  of  divinity  publish  a 
 full  collection  and  nervous  confutation  of  them. 
 Tiiey  formed  directions  for  disposing  of  bursaries 
 in  colleges  to  students,  especially  such  as  had 
 the  Irish  language.  In  answer  to  a  representa- 
 tion of  the  society  for  propagating  Christian 
 Knowledge,  they  appointed  all  those  who  had  not 
 made  the  above  recommended  collections,  to  do 
 it  without  further  delay,  and  enjoined  Synods  to 
 point  out  to  the  Society  what  places  had  most 
 need  of  schools  and  catechists.  Almost  every 
 Assembly,  for  a  considerable  number  of  years,  is- 
 sued recommendations  for  the  assistance  of  that 
 useful  Society,  with  collections  of  money  or 
 otherwise.  'Hie  Assembly  I7II  recommended 
 to  Presbyteries  to  have  the  Lord's  Supper  so  ad- 
 ministered in  their  bounds,  that  people  might 
 liav(!  access  to  it  every  month  of  the  year.  Tliey 
 earnestly  enjoined  Presbyteries  to  labour,  to  their 
 ulmobl,  to  have  the  wor^hip  of  God  set  up,   and 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND.  407 
 
 daily  performed,  in  all  the  parts  of  it,  in   every 
 family  in  their  bounds.     They  formed  a  new  act 
 for  the  cautious  and  careful  procedure  of  Preshv- 
 teries   in    trying,  licensing",  and  ordaining  candi- 
 dates for  the  ministry  ;  and    eslahlished  a  For- 
 mula of  questions  and  engagements  for  them  at 
 licence   and   ordination,   in   which  they  solemnly 
 declare,  That  they  believe  the  Scriptures  of  the 
 Old  and  New  Testament  to  be  the  word  of  God, 
 and  only  rule  of  faith    and   manners;   that   they 
 sincerely  own  and  believe   the   wholk   doctrine? 
 contained  in  the  Conjl'ssion  of  FaiOi,  and  ^\  ill,  to 
 the   utmost   of  their  power,  constantly  maintain 
 the  same,  along  with  the   purity  of  worship  i)re- 
 sently  practised  in  this  church,  —  and  disown  all 
 Popish,  Arian,  Socinian,  Arminian,   Bourignian, 
 and  other  doctrines,  tenets,  or  opinions  whatso- 
 ever, inconsistent  with,  or  contrary  to  said  Con- 
 fession of  Faith; — that  they  believe  the  Presbyte- 
 rian government  and  discipline  of  this  church  to 
 he  founded  on  the  u'ord  of  God,  and  will  maintain, 
 sup})ort,  and  defend  the  same  all  the  days  of  their 
 life  ; — that  they  will  meekly  submit    themselves 
 to  their  respective  judicatories,  and  maintain  the 
 unity  and  peace  of  the  church,  and  follow  no  di- 
 visive course  from  her  established  doctrine,  wor- 
 ship, discipline,  and  government ; — that  zeal  for 
 the  honour  of  God,  love  to  Jesus  Christ,  and  de- 
 sire of  saving  souls,  are  their  great  motives  and 
 chief  inducements  to  enter  into  the   holy    minis- 
 try, and  not  any  worldly  designs  or  interest; — 
 that  they  have  used    no   vndiir  vwtJiod.s,  either  hy 
 iJwmselves  or  oiJiers,  in  procurnig  their  call  ;   that 
 in  the  strength  of  Christ  they  will   live  an  holy 
 and  circumspect  life,   and    faithfully,    diligent  1' 
 and  checjlully  discharge  all  the  parts  of  tin-  i 
 
 y, 
 
 lii- 
 
408  A  coMPKNnioi.'s  history  of  the 
 
 nisterial  work  to  the  edification  of  the  body  of 
 Christ,  i)articularly  of  the  ])eople  entrusted  to 
 them.  These,  however  little  regarded  by  many, 
 still  continue  the  ordination  vows  of  all  ministers 
 in  the  established  church. This  Assembly  fur- 
 ther prohibited  all  students  or  preachers  to  offer 
 themselves  to  licence  or  ordination,  unless  they 
 carried  sufficient  testimonials  from  their  profes- 
 sors, parishes,  and  Presbyteries  ;  and  aj)pointed 
 their  CommJssion  to  acquaint  ministers  in  foreign 
 j)arts  what  testimonials  they  may  safely  receive 
 IVom  candidates  that  offer  themselves  to  licence 
 or  ordination  with  them.  As  good  order,  as  well 
 as  the  Large  Overtures,  required  vacant  congre- 
 gations to  be  supplied  only  by  their  own  Presby- 
 tery, unless  they  be  invited  by  the  Presbytery  in 
 whose  bounds  that  vacancy  lies,  or  at  least  some 
 neighbouring  minister  of  it ;  the  Large  Overtures 
 requires  the  invitation  of  neighbouring  ministers, 
 and  the  harmonious  consent  of  the  elders  of  the 
 vacant  parish. 
 
 During  the  preceding  twenty-two  years,  the 
 ]{cvolution  church  had  continued  in  much  the 
 same  condition.  The  Lord  had  not  a  little  coun- 
 tenanced her  ministrations,  especially  by  the 
 more  faithful,  for  the  instruction,  conviction,  con- 
 version, and  edification  of  souls,  which  had  been 
 left  by  the  curates  in  a  most  ignorant  or  profli- 
 gate case.  The  clergy  had  somewhat  rectified 
 several  defects  of  their  original  erection  with  re- 
 spect to  the  asserting  of  Christ's  sole  headship  over 
 tlie  church,  her  intrinsic  power,  and  the  divine 
 right  of  Fresbijterian  government.  The  modera- 
 tor of  the  Assembly  1692,  with  consent  of  the 
 members,  boldly  remonstrated  to  the  king's  com- 
 missioner, that  the  office-bearers  in  the  house  of 
 Ciod  have  a  spirit ual  Intrinsic  power  from   .lesus 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  409 
 
 Christ   the  only   hend  of  his  church,  to  niert  in 
 Assemblies  about  the  affairs  thereof     M my  |)ro- 
 testations   of  the  same    kind    were  made  in  the 
 Assembly  1703,  when  the  Queen's  commissioner 
 dissolved  it.     The    Assembly  1701^   plainly    tohl 
 her  majesty,  that  they  were  now  a^-ain  met  in  a 
 national  Assembly  in  the  name  of  the  Lord  Je- 
 sus  Christ. — and    a])[)rovcd  several  Synod  books, 
 which  contained  new  acts  assertini;  Christ's  sole 
 headship  over  his  chnrcli,  her  intrinsic poxver^  and 
 the  divine  right  of  Presttytcrij.      The  Assembly 
 J  705,  in  their  ,5Lh  act,  expressly  assert  tlu*  Lord 
 Jesus  Christ  to  be  the  alone  king  and  head  of  his 
 church.     The  Asssembly  1707,  in  their  llthact. 
 expressly   declare,    IViat  our  Lord  Jesus  Christ 
 hath  instituted  a  government  and  governors  ecclesi- 
 astir.al  in  his  own  house,  with  jjower  to  meet  for  the 
 order  and  government  thereof.     At  the  conclusion 
 of  each    Assembly,   the   moderator,    before    the 
 king's   commissioner,   publicly  declares,   that  as 
 the  Assembly  met  in  the  name  of  our  Lord  Jesus 
 Christ,  the  only  king   and  head  of   his   church, 
 so    they    part    in    the    same. — The  Commission 
 1698,  in  their  Seasonable  AdmonitioHy  pui)licly  de- 
 clare.   We    do  believe   and  own,  that  Jesus  Christ 
 is    the    ONLY    H^AD    and    king    of  his    church; 
 and  that  he   hath  instituted  in  his  church  officers 
 and  ordinances,   order  and  government,   and   not 
 left  it  to  the  will  of  men,  magistrate,  or  church,  to 
 alter  it  at  their  pleasure.     And  we  believe  this  go- 
 vernment  is  ne'ither  Prelatical  nor  congregational, 
 hut  Presbyterian^  which  now,  throuirh  the  mercy 
 of  God,  is  established  amniig  us;  ami  believe  wc 
 have  a  letter  foundation  for  this  our  government 
 than  the  inclinations  of  the  people,  or  laws  of  jnen. 
 This  seasonable  Admonition  was  ratifnd  and  ap- 
 .'3  G 
 
410  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 proved  l)y  the  Assembly  1699,  act  xii.  By  the 
 above  mentioned  Fokmlla  of  1711,  every  can- 
 didate licensed  to  ppf^ach,  or  ordained  to  the  mi- 
 nistry, is  required  solemnly  and  j)ublicly  to  avow, 
 That  tlie  Presbyterian  ^^overnment  and  discipline 
 of  this  ehiireh  lire  J'uundid  on  the  word  of  God. — 
 All  alonii'  to  1710,  the  Assemblies,  in  their  causes 
 of  fasting-  or  otherwise,  more  or  less  acknowledged 
 the  binding  obligation  of  our  public  covenants. 
 In  act  5th,  1700,  they  lament  our  continued  un- 
 faithfulness to  God,  notwithstanding  our  solemn 
 covenants  and  engagements  to  the  contrary.  In 
 act  9th,  1710,  they  say,  Our  sins  are  the  more 
 aggravated,  that  they  are  against  so  solemn  and 
 repeated  vows,  and  engagemeids,  and  covenants 
 with  God,  which  have  jjeen  openly  violated  and 
 broken  by  persons  of  all  ranks,  and  treated  with 
 public  contempt  and  indignities.  To  these  two 
 acts  they,  for  several  years  after,  refer  in  their 
 causes  of  lasting.  In  act  7th,  1710,  they  say, 
 The  crying  sins  both  of  former  and  present  times 
 are  highly  aggravated  by  the  violation  of  our  ^o- 
 lemn  covenants  and  engagements  to  the  contrary. 
 But,  by  this  time,  tlie  temporal  advantages  of 
 our  incorporating  union  with  Kngland  began  to 
 be  more  anil  more  overi)aianced  by  the  introduc- 
 tion of  sinful  corruptions  from  that  country.  The 
 Sahbath  began  to  be  greatly  profaned  by  driving 
 of  cattle  and  other  unnecessary  labours.  The  so- 
 cieties for  reformation  of  manners  gradually- 
 dwindled  a^^'ay.  Our  nobility  and  gentry,  by 
 little  and  little,  gave  up  with  family  religion,  and 
 dropt  the  very  form  of  godliness.  Spending  much 
 of  their  time  in  England,  they  either  contracted 
 a  liking  to  the  hierarchy  and  suj)erstition  there 
 used,  or  lived  nuich  in  the  neglect  of  i)ublic  wor- 
 ship ;  and  being  there  under  no   ministerial  ii\- 
 
 1 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  411 
 
 spection,  they  and  their  families  foUowoc!  their 
 own  inclinations  without  controul. — Pul)lic  oaths 
 in  qualifying  men  for  civil  offices,  or  in  collecting 
 of  taxes,  w^ere  exceedingly  multiplied,  and  much 
 perjury  thereby  increased.  The  aljjuraiion  oath, 
 which  had  for  some  years  been  used  in  l.ngland, 
 was  extended  to  those  in  places  of  power  and 
 trust  in  Scotland,  to  be  taken  along  with  the 
 oath  of  allegiance  and  the  assurance.  The  ej)is- 
 copalian  party  introduced  the  English  ceremo- 
 nies and  service,  which  their  fathers  had  refused. 
 And  notwithstanding  the  Assembly  1707  made 
 an  act  against  it,  and  the  commission  used  some 
 means  to  prevent  it,  they  were  but  the  more  for- 
 ward to  set  it  up,  or  extol  it,  and  to  rail  at  the 
 gospel  simplicity  of  the  established  worship.  Nay, 
 the  idolatrous  worship  of  the  Papists  was  openly 
 practised  and  connived  at.  A  superstitious  form 
 of  swearing,  by  laying  the  hand  on  and  kissing  the 
 gospel,  was  introduced  into  some  of  our  civil 
 courts.  Such  Scotsmen  as  served  the  sovereign 
 in  England  or  Ireland,  were  required  to  take  the 
 Lord's  Supper  in  the  English  manner,  as  a  test  of 
 their  loyalty,  and  otherwise  conform  to  the  litur- 
 gy and  ceremonies.  An  observation  of  su])ersti- 
 tious  holy  days  was  encouraged  by  the  vac. a  ion 
 of  our  civil  courts  in  the  end  of  the  year,  .yc. 
 Addresses  to  the  House  of  Peers  were  rejecicd, 
 unless  they    were  directed  to  the  Lords  spiutval 
 
 as  well    as    temporal. Strongly    attached    to 
 
 their  Popish  pretcnder,many  of  the  episcopal  dcr- 
 gy,  of  whom,  in  1707,  1^>.)  still  retained  their 
 churches  and  stipends,  began  to  plead  lor  a 
 middle  state  of  souls  after  death,  and  jjr^jjers  for 
 the  dead; — the  Lord's  Supper  !)eing  a  prupitiatorj/ 
 sacrifice  for  sin  ; — the  ?nising  of  the  sacramental 
 
 1 
 
412  A  COAirKNDIOUS    HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 ^vine  with  water;  the  necessity  of  ahsolufion  hj 
 a  jwicsf,  and  cnnfcssion  of  sins  to  him  in  order  to 
 1  ori;iveness  of  them  ;  the  anoiniing  with  oil  ia 
 baptism  and  other  eases  ; — the  ncccssifv  of  epis- 
 coj)al  ordination  and  hoptism  to  salvation  ; — the 
 hirding  towards  the  altar,  and  at  the  name  of  Je- 
 sus ; — the  reception  of  the  vwaning  of  the  scrip- 
 tures jrom  the  cliurch  or  clergy  ; — and  tlie  rejec- 
 tion of  the  Athanasian  creed,  concerning  the  Tri- 
 nity, used  in  the  Knglish  service,  and  to  recom- 
 mend Popish  bo(jks  containing  devotions  and 
 'prayers  to  the  virgin  Mary  and  other  saints. 
 
 iMeanwhile,  contrary  to  the  most  solem  secu- 
 rity granted  to  the  Presbyterian  establishment  in 
 the  treaty  of  union,  the  British  Parliament,  1712, 
 grimted  the  episcopalians  an  almost  unbounded 
 iolcraiion^  providing  their  clergy  took  the  oaths 
 to  the  government,  and  prayed  for  Queen  Anne, 
 who  was  now  straining  every  nerve  to  bring  her 
 Popish  su])posed  brother  to  the  throne— prohibit- 
 ing magistrates  to  oblige  them  to  appear  before 
 any  established  church  judicatory,  and  recpiired 
 them  to  protect  them  in  their  public  worship,  so 
 long  as  they  did  not  turn  Paj)ists  or  blas})hemers. 
 To  protect  such  of  them  as  should  scruple  at  the 
 oathoi' ahjuratio/it  which  solemnly  renounced  their 
 Popish  pretender,  and  avowed  the  rightful  suc- 
 cession of  the  elector  of  Hanover  to  the  crown 
 in  liis  stead,  the  Parliament,  now  managed  by 
 JaC'bilical  influence,  imposed  that  oath  upr)n 
 every  Presbyterian  minister,  under  a  very  heavy 
 penalty,  if  thiy  should  continue  to  ofliciate  with- 
 out taking  it.  \ly  the  imposition  of  this  oath, 
 (Vfihigt/oi/s  or  ddngrrous  in  several  of  its  (expres- 
 sions, and  expres>ly  said  in  the  English  act,  first 
 imposing  it   to  be    calculated   lor  the  pcrpeii(al 
 
CHURCH  OF   SCOTLAND  413 
 
 maintenance  of  the  church  of  Engl  and  as  hij  tair  cs- 
 iahlisJied^  and  in  which  one  had  to  swear  to  main- 
 tain the  succession  of  the  British  crown  as  li- 
 niited  by  two  acts  of  the  English  Parliament,  one 
 of  which  expressly  provided,  that  the  successor 
 should  be  of  the  communion  of  the  church  of  Enrr. 
 land,  and  swear  to  maintain  her  as  hij  law  establish- 
 ed,  the  Presbyterian  clergy  would  either,  by  their 
 general  refusal,  ^ive  the  court  a  handle  to  over- 
 turn their  establishment,  or  at  least  be  divided 
 and  weakened,  and  the  refusers  a()pear  as  dis- 
 loyal as  any  of  the  Jacobites,  thoui^h  their  scru- 
 ples were  very  different ly  founded.  And,  to  pro- 
 voke the  Presbyterians  the  more,  the  Parliament 
 restored  patronages  in  their  v.  hole  extent,  pro- 
 viding only,  that  patrons  took  the  oaths  to  i^^o- 
 vernment,  and  did  not  profess  themselves  Pa- 
 pists. The  Jacobites'  doctrine  of  unlimited  olje- 
 dience  toSoverei^^ns,  and  their  distinction  of  them 
 by  right  and  by  actual  possession,  qualified  multi- 
 tudes of  them  in  Scotland,  as  well  as  in  Eng- 
 land, to  swear  the  oa/h  of  ahjura{wnt  when  im- 
 posed by  authoriti),  and  now  plainly  enough  im- 
 posed, as  a  mean  of  enthroning  their  Pojjish  pre- 
 tender. 
 
 These  acts,  so  hastily  passed,  exceedingly 
 alarmed  the  Scotch  Presbyterians,  'i'he  tolera- 
 /io7ienervated  their  discipline,  and  encouraged  the 
 Jacobites  in  their  rudeness  and  insolence  towards 
 the  establisiied  religion  and  clergy,  and  opened 
 a  door  for  almost  every  error  and  abomination  in 
 the  worship  of  God.  I'he  restoration  (f  jjat/onagr 
 was  calculated  to  fdl  the  church  with  Ja< dbiiish 
 or  naughty  clergymen  by  means  of  solicitations 
 or  simoniacal  pactions,  and  so  occasion  much 
 perjury  in  their  ordination  vows,  and  render  their 
 
414  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 ministrations  contemptiMc,  useless,  and  hurtful. 
 The  imposition  of  the  ahjurafion.  oaf/f  on  ininisfcrs^ 
 as  a  condition  of  their  entrance  to,  or  exercise  of 
 their  office,  rendered  them  more  and  more  the 
 slaves  of  an  Krastian  court — tended  to  debauch 
 their  consciences,  in  taking  oaths  without  any  ne- 
 cessity, or  even  without  due  certainty  of  their 
 lawfulness,  or  any  plain  tendency  to  the  lionour 
 of  Cod,  and  to  diminish  their  zeal  for  their  co- 
 venanted reformation  and  Presbyterian  govern- 
 ment, and  render  them  approvers  of  the  perjuri- 
 ous settlement  of  religion  by  the  incorporating 
 union  with  England  ;  and  threatened,  as  it  soon 
 actually  did,  to  produce  the  most  mournful  divi- 
 sions among  ministers,  or  between  them  and  their 
 hearers.  To  prevent  the  passing  of  these  acts, 
 the  Commission  transmitted  solemn  addresses  to 
 her  Majesty,  pleading  the  laws  j)erpetually  con- 
 firmed by  the  union  settlement  in  opposition  to 
 the  int(  nded  toleration  and  restoration  of  patron- 
 ages, which  addresses  the  Assembly  approved,  and 
 seconded  wi*h  an  address  of  their  own.  The 
 Commission  'also  addressed  her  w  ith  respect  to 
 the  alijuration  oath^  and,  in  a  solemn  profession  of 
 their  loyalty,  declared  their  sense  of  it — which 
 she  said  was  acceptable  to  her.  Hereupon  the 
 Assembly,  in  another  address,  begged  that  she 
 would  interpose  her  influence  for  preventing  the 
 prosecution  of  scrupulous  refusers  of  it.  Messrs. 
 Carstairs,  ]jlackwell,  and  Hailie,  were  sent  to 
 London  to  present  these  addresses,  and  to  agent 
 their  cause;  but  all  to  no  purpose. 
 
 As  the  abjuration  oath  produced  the  most  dis- 
 agreeable divisions,  the  Assemblies,  1712,  17KS, 
 1714,  and  1715,  by  express  acts,  recommended 
 and  obtcatcd  all  ministers  to  cultivate  peace  and 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  415 
 
 liarniony,  notwithstanding  their  difTercnt  views 
 or  practices  with  respect  to  it.  The  other  more 
 remarkal)le  acts  of  these  Assemhlies  were,  for 
 assisting  and  encoura^inc^  the  Soclchj  for  Propa- 
 gating Christian  Knowledge ;  for  reoular  admis- 
 sion of  infants  to  baptism;  for  more  frequent  ad- 
 ministration of  the  Lord's  Supper;  for  purging 
 the  scandals  of  scddiers  ;  for  directing  the  visi- 
 tors of  synod  registers;  for  regulating  the  licens- 
 ing of  preachers,  and  discouraging  unworthy  bur- 
 sars; and  for  execution  of  former  acts  to  [)revent 
 the  growth  of  Popery.  The  Commission,  1713, 
 emitted  a  seasonable  warning  to  be  read  from  eve- 
 ry pulpit,  entreating  people  to  beware  of  being 
 deluded  by  the  subtile  pretences  of  the  Jacobites, 
 who  really  laboured  to  bring  them  under  the 
 yoke  of  a  Popish  pretender  ;  and  the  Assembly, 
 1714^,  presented  an  address  to  her  Majesty,  re- 
 presenting the  alarming  increase  of  Popery. 
 About  this  time  the  curates  were  become  ex- 
 tremely insolent  and  abusive,  intruded  them- 
 selves into  vacant  congregations,  and  encourag- 
 ed their  followers  to  mob  such  as  were  appoint- 
 ed by  their  Presbyteries  to  preach  in  them.  But 
 most  of  them  joining  in  the  rebellion,  1715,  they 
 were  turned  out  of  their  kirks  by  the  JMagis- 
 trates. 
 
 After  the  accession  of  King  George  T.  to  the 
 throne  in  1714*,  the  Assembly  il\5  transmit- 
 ted to  him  and  the  members  of  Parliament,  a  new 
 representation  of  their  grievances,  relative  to  the 
 toleration  and  ahjuralion  oath,  patronages,  and  (he 
 sacramental  test  imposed  on  Scotch uien  while 
 serving  the  Sovereign  in  England  and  Ireland. 
 He  got  his  Parliament,  that  year,  to  turn  the  as 
 of  reduplication  on  the  two  English  acts  men- 
 
416  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTOUV  OF  THP: 
 
 tioned  in  that  oath  into  which,  and  to  declare 
 that  it  was  not  intended  to  oblige  his  subjects  in 
 Scotland  to  any  thini;  inconsistent  with  their 
 lei^-al  establishment  oi'  their  relii^ion.  And  as, 
 not\vithstandin2^  this,  many  still  scrupled  at  that 
 oath,  the  Parliament,  17  tD,  removed  all  mention 
 of  their  Enf^lish  acts  out  of  the  form  of  it  imposed 
 upon  ministers  and  schoolmasters.  In  conse- 
 quence of  this,  the  most  of  the  ministers  took  it, 
 and  the  few  that  did  not,  became  disliked  by  their 
 brethren,  but  more  esteemed  by  many  of  the  peo- 
 ple. About  the  same  time,  the  Parliament  en- 
 acted, That  all  presentations  given  by  patrons  to 
 candidates  for  vacant  cong-regations  should  be  of 
 no  effect,  unless  the  presentee  accepted  or  de- 
 clared liis  willingness  to  accept,  which  it  was,  for 
 a  time,  expected  few  or  none  would.  At  least  the 
 church  had  full  power  to  prohibit  candidates  to 
 accept  presentations,  until  they  had  first  the  call 
 of  the  congregation. 
 
 The  union  settlement,  and  especially  ministers 
 taking  the  oath  of  abjuration,  having  given  new 
 ground  of  offence  to  Messrs.  John  M'Millan.  late 
 minister  of  Balmaghie,  John  Taylor  of  Wam- 
 phray,  John  Flepburn  of  Orr,  and  James  Ciil- 
 christ  of  Dunscore,  as  well  as  to  Messrs.  John 
 ]M*Neil  and  John  Adamson,  ])rcachers — they 
 went  about  inveighing  against  the  same.  On  this 
 account  the  Assemblies  1715,  1716,  1717,  and 
 their  inferior  judicatories,  prosecuted  them  with 
 no  small  severity.  No  less  than  about  twenty- 
 four  acts  and  overtures  were  passed  against  these 
 pious,  but  sometimes  imprudent  and  mistaking 
 friends  of  our  covenantid  reformation,  eleven 
 of  whieli  respected  Mr.  Hepburn,  arc!  nine  iMr. 
 M*JMillan.     JNIr.  Hepburn  had  been  driven  from 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  417 
 
 his  charge,  and  suffered  a  lono^  imprisonment,  he- 
 sides  many  other  harassments.  JNIr.  INI'iMillaii 
 had  been  driven  from  his  charge,  and  another 
 thrust  into  his  place.  Mr  Gilchrist  was  depos- 
 ed and  laid  under  a  sentence  of  excommunica- 
 tion, appointed  to  be  intimated  in  all  the  parish 
 churches  in  Scotland.  Meanwhile  these,  and  the 
 two  following"  Assemblies,  made  acts  for  assist- 
 ance to  the Sociefi/ for  Propagating  ('hristian  Know- 
 ledge, and  for  the  speedy  settlement  of  ministers 
 in  the  Highlands — and  against  Popery  and  pro- 
 faneness; — and  repeatedly  enjoined  Presbyteries, 
 without  delay,  seriously  to  consider  the  large 
 overtures  above-mentioned,  in  order  to  their  be- 
 ing established  as  a  complete  directory  for  disci- 
 pline  and  government ; — and  prohibited  prelatical 
 curates  or  Presbyterian  separatists,  to  exercise  dis- 
 cipline on  any  members  of  thischurch.  The  Assem- 
 bly, 17 18, issued  arecommendation  for  providing  a 
 fund  for  supporting  the  indigent  widows  and  or- 
 phans of  ministers.  The  Assembly,  1719,  enjoin- 
 ed every  minister  to  take  care  to  have  deacons  as 
 well  ^s  riding  ciders  m  his  congicgation.  They  issu- 
 ed a  solemn  warning  against  smugp^ling  of  goods, 
 and  perjuries  at  custom  houses,  in  matters  of 
 trade,  to  be  read  in  all  the  parishes  of  Scotland, 
 and  enjoined  synods,  Presbyteries,  and  sessions, 
 to  execute  the  acts  of  Assembly  against  abuses  at 
 penny- weddmgs,  and  to  apply  to  the  magistrates 
 to  execute  the  civil  laws  against  such  as  are 
 found  guilty.  They  also  framed  an  overture  for 
 regulating  the  settlement  of  vacant  congrega- 
 tions, especially  where  the  patron's  (h^lay  for  six 
 months  had  put  the  matter  in  the  hands  of  the 
 Presbytery,  iji  which  elders,  and  especially  heri- 
 tors, a  majority  of  whom  is  required,  are  repre- 
 
 3  n 
 
418  A  COMrENDIOlTS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 sented  as  the  proper  electors,  thouf^li,  especially 
 where  there  arc  no  elders,  heads  of  families,  and 
 persons  of  f^ood  reputation  in  the  congregation 
 are  to  be  regarded. 
 
 But  the  |)rincipal  business  of  these  Assemblies 
 respected  the  dorlr'nu'  of  the  church.      In   i714 
 there  c  omnienced  a  flagrant  report,  that  Mr  John 
 Simson,   Professor  of    divinity  in   the  college  of 
 Glasgow,  had  taught  Arminian  and  other  gross 
 errors.     Mr.  James  Webster,  a  most  pious  and 
 zealous  minister  of  Edinburgh,  finding  by  con- 
 verse with  him,  that  there  was  too  much  ground 
 for  this  report,  laid  the  matter  before  the  Gene- 
 ral   Assembly.       They    unreasonably    burdened 
 him  with  the  prosecution  of  iMr.  JSimson  before 
 his  own  Presbytery  of  Glasgow.    Notwithstand- 
 ing all  his  subtile  shifts  and  quibblings,   it  was 
 found  evident,  from  his  answers  to  his  libel,  and 
 his  letters  to  Mr.  Rowan,  that  he  had  taught, 
 That  nothing  is  to  be  admitted  in  religion   but 
 what  is  consonant  to  reason; — that  regard  to  our 
 own  happiness  in  the  enjoyment  of  God  ought 
 to  be  our  chief  motive  in  serving  him,   and  that 
 our  glorifying  of  God  is  subordinate  to  it ; — that 
 the  heathen  may  know,  by  the  light  of  nature, 
 that  God  hath  provided  a  remedy  for  sin,  and  if 
 they  w^'^uld   pray  sincerely   for  the  discovery  of 
 the  way  of  salvation,  he  w  ould  grant  it  to  them  ; 
 that  if  men  would  w  ith  diligence,  sincerity,  and 
 faith,  use  the  means  lor  obtaining  saving  grace, 
 God  hath  promised  to  grant  it  to  them;  and  that 
 the  using  of  these  means,  in  this  manner,  is  not 
 above  the  reach  of  their   natural  powers  ; — that 
 there  was  no  proper  covenant  made  by  God  w  ith 
 Adam  for  himself  and  his  posterity;  and  that  he 
 was  not  our  federal  head ;  that  it  is  inconsistent 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  419 
 
 with  God's  justice  and  goodness,  to  create  souls 
 wantini^'  original  riohteousnes,  and  that  the  souls 
 of  infants  since  the  Fall  are  created  pure  and 
 holy; — that  it  is  prohable,  there  are  more  of  man- 
 kind saved  than  damned ;  and  it  is  more  than 
 probable  that  baptized  infants,  dying  in  infancy, 
 are  all  saved ; — that  there  is  no  sinning  in  hell 
 after  the  last  judgment,  &c.  all  which  erroneous 
 tenets  were  fully  refuted  by  JNIessrs.  M'Laren 
 and  Flint,  ministers  of  Edinburgh.      But  such 
 was   the  power  of  his  friends  in  the  Assembly 
 1717,  which  concluded  his  process,  that  in  their 
 9th  act,  they  only  say,  that  he  had  given  offence, 
 and  had   vented  some  opinions  not  ncccssanj  to 
 be  taught  in  divinity,  and  that  have  given  more 
 occasion  for  strife,  than  to  the  promoting  of  edi- 
 fication ;  that  he  had  used  some  expressions  that 
 bear,  and  are  used  by  adversaries  in  an  unsound 
 sense,  though  he  disowns  that  unsound  sense; 
 and  for  answering  the  objections  of  adversaries, 
 he  had  adopted  some  hypotheses  different  from 
 what  are  commonly  used    among  orlhoilox  di- 
 vines, and  are  not  evidentli)  founded  on  Scripture, 
 and  tend  to  attribute  too  much  to  natural  rea- 
 son and  the  power  of  corrupt  nature,  which  un- 
 due advancement  of  reason  and  nature  is  always 
 to  the  disparagement  of  revelation  and  effica- 
 cious free  grace  ;  and  therefore  prohihit  him  to 
 use  such  expressions,  or  to  teach,  prcacii,  or  other- 
 wise vent  such  opinions,  propositions,  or  hypo- 
 theses, as  aforesaid. 
 
 l>\it  the  Assemblies  were  far  from  being  equal- 
 ly kind  to  such  as  earnestly  endeavoured  a  clear 
 illustration  of  the  doctrines  of  (lod's  free  grace 
 reigning  through  the  righteousness  of  Christ. 
 Mr.  Hamilton  of  Alrth  havijig  published  a  cate- 
 
420  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 chetiral  treatise  concerning  the  covenants  of  works 
 and  grace,  aiul  the  sacraments  of  haptisin  and 
 the  Lord's  Supper,  in  a  more  evan<:^elical  strain 
 than  some  wished,  tiie  Assemhly,  1710,  prohi- 
 bited all  ministers  or  members  of  this  church  to 
 print  or  disperse  in  writ  any  catechism,  without 
 the  allowance  of  the  Presbytery  of  the  bounds, 
 or  the  Commission.  The  Presbytery  of  Auch- 
 terarder  havinjn;-  begun  to  require  candidates  for 
 licence  to  acknowledge  it  vnsoimd  to  teach  that 
 men  must  forsake  their  sins  in  order  to  come  to 
 Christ,  the  Assembly,  1717,  on  the  same  day 
 they  had  dealt  so  gently  with  professor  Simson, 
 declared  their  abhorrence  of  that  proposition  as 
 tinsound  and  most  detestable — as  if  men  ouglit  on- 
 ly to  come  to  Christ,  the  alone  Saviour  from  sins, 
 after  they  have  got  rid  of  them  by  repentance. 
 Mr.  James  Hogg,  one  of  the  holiest  ministers  in 
 the  kingdom,  having  published  or  recommended 
 a  celebrated  and  edifying  tract  of  the  Cromwel- 
 lian  age,  called  the  Marrow  of  Modern  Divi nit tj, 
 the  Assembly  1720,  fell  upon  it  with  great  fury, 
 as  if  it  had  been  replete  with  Antinomian  er- 
 rors, though  it  is  believed  many  of  these  zealots 
 never  read  it,  at  hast  had  never  perused  it,  in 
 connection  with  the  2d  part  oi'  it,  which  is  whol- 
 ly taken  up  in  manifesting  the  obligation,  mean- 
 ing, and  advantages  of  observing  the  law  of  God. 
 They  condemned  the  ottering  of  C  hrist  as  a  Sa- 
 viour to  all  men,  or  to  sinners  as  such — and  the 
 doctrine  of  believers'  full  deliverance  from  under 
 the  law  as  a  broken  covenant  of  works.  1  hey 
 asserted  men's  holiness  to  be  a  federal  or  condi- 
 tional mean  of  their  obtaining  eternal  happiness. 
 They  condemned  these  ahnost  express  declara- 
 tions of  Scripture,  that  believers  are  not  under 
 
CHURCH   OF  SCOTLAND.  421 
 
 the  law  ;  that  they  do  not  commit  sin  ;  that  the 
 Lord  sees  no  sin  in  them  ;  and  cannot  he  an^ry 
 with  them — as  Antinomian  paradoxes,  and  con- 
 demned the  distinction  of  the  moral  law  as  a  co- 
 venant of  works,  and  as  a  binding  rule  of  dutij  in 
 the  hand  of  Christ,  in  order  to  explain  these  ex- 
 pressions. IMessrs.  James  Hof^i-ir-,  Thomas  Bos- 
 ton, Ehenezer  and  Ralph  Erskines,  Gahriel  Wil- 
 son, and  seven  others  remonstrated  to  the  next 
 Assembly  a^-ainst  these  decisions,  as  injurions  to 
 the  doctrine  of  God's  Grace  ;  and,  in  their  an- 
 swers to  the  Commission's  twelve  (jueries,  they 
 illustrated  these  doctrines  with  no  small  clear- 
 ness and  evidence.  Perhaps  influenced  hy  this, 
 as  well  as  by  the  wide-spread  detestation  of  their 
 acts,  1720,  on  that  point,  the  Assenibly  1722 
 re-considered  the  same,  and  made  an  act  explain- 
 ing and  con/inning  them.  This  was  less  gross 
 and  erroneous.  Nevertheless  the  twelve  repre- 
 senters  protested  against  it  as  injurious  to  truth  ; 
 but  this  protest  was  not  allowed  to  be  marked. 
 The  moderator,  by  the  Assembly's  appointment, 
 rebuked  them  for  their  reflections  on  the  Assem- 
 bly 1720,  in  their  representation,  and  admonish- 
 ed them  to  beware  of  the  like  in  all  time  coming; 
 against  which  they  protested.  Mr.  Wilson  hav- 
 ing preached  an  excellent  sermon  before  the  sy- 
 nod of  Merse  and  Teviotdale,  in  172J,  in  whicli 
 he  had  freely  hinted  his  dislike  of  the  legal  doc- 
 trines and  other  corruptions  then  prevalent,  af- 
 ter two  years  harassment  before  the  synod  and 
 Commission,  he  was  at  last  dismissed  by  the  As- 
 sembly 1723  with  an  admonition. 
 
 Little  more  of  importance  was  done  in  these 
 Assemblies,  unless  that  about  L.12(K)  Sterling 
 were  collected  fur  the  persecuted  i\otestaots  of 
 
422  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 Lithuania,  and  four  of  their  students  appoint- 
 ed to  be  supported   hy   bursaries   whih^  attend- 
 ing the  study  of  divinity  at  the  college  of  Edin- 
 burgh.    Several  acts  were  made  for  preventing 
 the  increase  of  Popery,  and,  in  I72'J,  they  repre- 
 sented to  his  IMajesty  the  danger  of  his  govern- 
 ment l)y  it.     Otiier  acts  were  made  against  pro- 
 fanencss,  and  for  assisting  the  Socidyjor  Propa- 
 gating Christian  Knowledge,  and  for  planting  pro- 
 per ministers  and  teachers  in  the  North.     They 
 enacted,  That  none  shold  be  admitted  to,  or  con- 
 tinued in,  the  office  of  elders  or  deacons,  unless 
 they  were  circumspect  in  their  walk,  punctual 
 in  their  attendance  on  ordinances,  and  strict  in 
 their  observation  of  the  Lord's  day,  and  in  regu- 
 larly keeping  up  the  worship  of  God  in  their  fa- 
 milies ;  and  that  none  should  be  sent  to,   or  ad- 
 mitted members  of  the  General  Assembly,  unless 
 they  were  attested  by  the  Presbyteries,  &:c.  as 
 thus  qualified. 
 
 Many  of  the  clergy,  perhaps  fond  of  avoiding 
 every  appearance  of  good  will  towards  the  JMar- 
 row  of  Modern  Divinity,  seemed  now  more  legal 
 and  Haxterian  in  their  doctrine  than  formerly. 
 This  induced  multitudes  of  serious  Christians, 
 who  had  been  formerly  not  a  little  disgusted  by 
 their  swearing  of  the  altjuration  oath,  to  leave 
 them,  and  hear  the  representers  and  their  friends, 
 whom  the  late  dispute,  and  their  harassment  at- 
 tending it,  had  made  to  search  and  see  further  into 
 gospel  truth.  These,  notwithstanding  their  emi- 
 nent exemplification  and  earnest  urging  of  gos- 
 pel holiness,  were  exceedingly  traduced  by  the 
 prevailing  party,  as  new  scJiemers,  and  Antinonni- 
 an  encou racers  of  a  licentious  life.  Tiiey  had 
 probably  been  more  abundantly  reproached  and 
 
 7 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  4.23 
 
 harassed,  had  not  the  managers  got  their  hands 
 full  of  other   business.      Mr.  Hepburn,   above- 
 mentioned,  dying,  his  friends  in  Angus-shire  al- 
 most persuaded  Mr.  Francis  Archibald,  ministerof 
 Guthry,  into  their  sentiments.   By  this  and  some 
 concurrent  circumstances,    more    than  ordinary 
 noise  concerning  the  national  covenant  and  solemn 
 league  happened  in  that  country.     Roused  here- 
 by, Mr.  John  Glass,  a  young  popular  preacher  in 
 it,  set  himself  to  rail  at  these  covenants,  as  un- 
 warrantable under  the  New  Testament,  and  not 
 obligatory,  and  even  against  some  articles  of  the 
 Confession  of  Faith.      He  further  taught,   that 
 national  churches  are  unwarrantable  under  the 
 New  Testament ;  that  the  kingdom  of  Israel  was 
 of  an  ecclesiastical  nature,  and  its  officers  church 
 officers ;  that  then   church   and   state   were   the 
 same ;  and  both  entirely  typical ;  that  the  Old 
 Testament   church    was    an    earthly    kingdom ; 
 that  all   church    covenants    that  bring   her    in- 
 to any  connexion  with   the   state,  are  legal  and 
 earthly,  and  means  of  introducing  profane  per- 
 sons into  her.     By  his  address  he  decoyed  Mr. 
 Archibald   into  his  notions,   to  which  they  soon 
 added  others,  as  that  Ccmfessions  of  Faith  ought 
 not  to  be  subscribed;  that  only  congregational 
 churches  are  warranted  under  the  Gospel  ;   that 
 illiterate  men  are  fit  for  preaching  the  (xospel ; 
 that  Christian  congregations  have  power  to  or- 
 dain their  own  teachers  ;  that  all  members  have 
 a  share  in  governing  the  church  ;   that  Chiistian 
 magistrates  have  no  more  power  about  religious 
 matters  than  other  men,  and   ought  not  to  em- 
 ploy their  power  for  advancing  religion,  or  for 
 restraining  or  i)unishing  heretics,  or  for  giving 
 more  encouragement  to  good  Christians,  than  to 
 
424  A  COMPENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 other  ^ood  subjects.  Notwithstanding  all  means 
 for  reclaiminLC  them,  they  obstinately  went  about 
 preachinc;^  their  principles  in  fields  and  streets,  or 
 printing  pamphlets  in  favours  of  them.  They 
 were  therefore  suspended  in  17-8,  and  l^ecause 
 they  contemned  this  censure,  they  were,  about 
 two  years  after,  deposed.  But  notwithstanding 
 their  laying  out  themselves  to  their  utmost,  to 
 erect  independent  churches  of  a  new  form,  in 
 every  corner  where  they  could  find  any  encou- 
 ragement,  the  Assembly  17^59  reponed  them  to 
 their  office,  though  not  to  their  charges. — On  the 
 other  hand,  it  began  to  be  loudly  reported,  that 
 professor  Simson  had  not  only  continued  to  dis- 
 regard the  prohibition  of  the  Assembly  1717, 
 and  teach  his  above-mentioned  errors — but  also 
 had  taught,  that  ,Jes2is  Christ  is  not  necessarily  ex- 
 iste?if ; — that  the  persons  in  the  Godhead  are  not  the 
 very  same  in  substance  ; — that  necessary  existence, 
 supreme  Deity,  and  being  the  only  true  God,  may 
 be  taken  in  a  sense  import  in  i^  the  personal  property 
 of  the  Father,  and  so  not  belonging  to  the  Son  or 
 Holy  Ghost.  Both  libels  were  fully  proven 
 against  him  ;  but  the  first  was  left  undiscussed. 
 In  consequence  of  his  declaring  his  mind  on  the 
 latter  points  in  orthodox  language,  and  after 
 much  (piibbling  and  tergiversation,  professing 
 his  sorrow  for  some  of  the  oifensive  expressions 
 proved  against  him,  the  Assembly  J  728,  suspend- 
 ed him  from  all  exercise  of  any  ecclesiastical 
 power  or  function  till  another  Assend)ly  should 
 think  fit  to  restore  him.  And  the  Assend)Iy 
 1720  further  declared,  that  it  was  not  fit  that 
 he  should  be  any  further  entrusted  with  the 
 training  up  of  students  for  the  holy  ministry. 
 This  slight  censure  of  an  Arminian,  and  an  Ari- 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  42'5 
 
 an  blasphemer,  exceedingly  grieved  and  olTend- 
 ed  multitudes  of  the  mere  serious. 
 
 Scarcely  was  this  prosecution  of  Professor 
 Simson  finished,  when  Mr.  Campbell,  professor  of 
 church  history  in  the  college  of  St.  Andrew's, 
 began,  from  the  press,  to  ridicule  close  walking 
 with  God,  and  acknowledging  him  in  all  our 
 v/ays,  as  enthusiasm,  and  to  aver,  that  in  the  in- 
 terval between  Christ's  death  and  resurrection, 
 his  disciples  looked  on  him  as  a  cheat  and  im- 
 postor;— that  self  love  is  the  chief  motive  and 
 standard  of, all  virtuous  and  religious  actions; — 
 that  the  existence  of  God,  and  the  immortality  of 
 the  soul  cannot  be  known  by  the  light  of  nature; 
 that  notwithstanding  the  laws  of  nature  are  a 
 certain  and  sufficient  rule  to  direct  rational  minds 
 to  happiness,  and  the  observation  of  them  is  the 
 great  mean  of  our  real  and  lasting  felicity.  For 
 these  he  was  processed  before  the  judicatories ; 
 but,  by  his  artful  colourings  of  his  tenets,  and 
 pretences  to  adhere  to  the  Confession  of  Faith , 
 as  Professor  Simson  had  always  done,  he  not 
 only  escaped  censure,  but  drew  the  Assembly, 
 1786,  which  finished  his  process,  into  an  appro- 
 bation of  his  doctrine  concerning  self  love. 
 
 Dr.  William  Wishart,  late  principal  of  the  col- 
 lege of  Edinburgh,  was  soon  after  found  to  have 
 taught  from  the  press.  That  men  are  not  alto- 
 gether, if  at  all,  vitiated  with  original  sin  ;  that 
 the  light  of  nature  may,  in  some  instances,  be 
 sufficient  to  lead  mankind  to  complete  happiness  ; 
 that  freedom  of  inquiry  should  never  be  restrain- 
 ed by  any  Formula  of  doctrine,  or  Confession  of 
 faith  ;  that  the  minds  of  children  should  not  be 
 biassed  to  the  principles  of  a  party,  by  learning 
 catechisms  by  heart ;  that  civil  magistrates  have 
 
 3  I 
 
4-26  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 no  power  to  punisli  heresies  of  any  kind,  but  their 
 jurisdiction  reacheth  only  to  those  crimes  that 
 are  committed  against  the  state;  and  that  all 
 men  oui;ht  to  have  full  liberty  to  speak  and  write 
 as  they  please,  provided  their  senti»>ients  do  not 
 endanger  the  welfare  of  civil  society. — His  {)ro- 
 cess  came  Ijefore  the  Assembly  i7.>(^;  but  his 
 artful  colouring  of  his  errors,  and  his  profession 
 of  adiierence  to  the  Confession  of  Faith,  brought 
 him  off,  without  any  censure;  inconsequence  of 
 which,  he  soon  after,  from  the  press,  recommend- 
 ed  Dr.  Whichcofs  sermons  to  the  students  of  di- 
 vinity to  form  upon, — without  the  smallest  warn- 
 ing against  the  Arminian  and  Socinian  errors 
 therein  contained,  viz  That  as  to  moral  duties, 
 we  have  the  Jul!  concurrence  of  all  heathen  authors 
 that  are  ani/  whit  reformed;  (according  to  which, 
 dependance  on  Christ,  walking  with  God,  ur  vvor- 
 shipping  him  in  three  persons,  in  and  through 
 Christ  as  mediator,  and  the  like,  are  not  moral 
 duties,) — that  the  great  differences  hetivecn  men  in 
 the  several  ages  of  the  tvorld,  have  not  been  about 
 any  necessarif  truth  or  any  thing  plainly  declared 
 in  scripture,  (according  to  which,  the  doctrine  of 
 three  distinct  persons  in  the  God-head, — the  true 
 and  supreme  God  head  of  Christ, — the  necessity, 
 reality,  and  vicarious  nature  of  his  satisfaction 
 for  our  sins, — free  justification  l)y  his  imputed 
 righteousness, — regeneration  and  sanctification 
 by  the  almighty  influence  of  his  spirit ;  and  of 
 original  sin  imputed  or  inherent, — men's  natu- 
 ral inability  to  will  or  jierform  that  which  is  natu- 
 rally good,  cVc. — are  all  excluded  from  being  ne- 
 cessary truths,  or  clearly  revealed  in  the  scrip- 
 ture,)-  that  no  perfection  of  God's  nature  in- 
 clines him.  to  punish  sin,  but  to  be  reconcileable  to 
 (ill  that  repent; — that  that  repentance,  which  is  in 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLAND.  427 
 
 the  power  of  every  man,  is  the  term  or  condition  of 
 the  neio  covenant,  renders  men  objects  of  the  divine 
 compassion,  and  removes  the  necessity  of  divine  pun- 
 ishment ; — that  to  be  accepted  in  and  throv(j;h  Christ, 
 or  justified  through  his  righteousness,  is  to  be  assur- 
 ed,  that  God  through  the  perfection  of  his  own  na- 
 ture, is  reconcileable  to  sinners,  and  is  absolutely  re- 
 solvedand  engaged  to  pardon  their  sin  in  and  through 
 Chiist,  to  all  who  repent  and  believe  ;  that  religion 
 is  just  a  moving  according  to  reason  ;  that  if  men 
 use  their  natural  pouters  aright  by  consideration, 
 they  may  spiritucdly  understand  the  scriptures,  and 
 make  room  for,  and  render  the  infucnce  of  God's 
 grace  effectual,  and  find  him  their  superlative  de- 
 light, (!^c.  (§c. 
 
 While  the  errors  that  were  creeping  into  the 
 church,  were  so  tenderly  handled,  and  the  spread- 
 ers of  them  dismissed  from  the  bar  of  General 
 Assemblies  on  the  easiest  terms,  they,  who  set 
 themselves  against  the  growing  defections,  were 
 not  a  little  oppressed.  For  about  a  dozen  of 
 years  after  patronages  had  been  restored  by  the 
 Parliament,  no  candidates  had  courage  to  im- 
 prove a  presentation  for  their  own  intrusion  on 
 reclaiming  congregations.  At  first,  one  or  two 
 probationers  began  to  accept  presentations :  but 
 the  outcry  against  them  was  so  great,  that  they 
 soon  retracted  and  passed  from  them.  But  Mr. 
 Chambers,  Principal  of  the  college  of  Aberdeen, 
 having  accepted  a  presentation  to  Old  Machir, 
 probationers  and  others  took  courage,  and  fol- 
 lowed his  example  ;  and  though  they,  at  first, 
 qualified  their  acceptances,  with  having  the  peo- 
 ple's consent,  yet  they  would  not  retract,  after 
 the  people  had  shewed  their  aviTsion.  About 
 1729  and   1730,  intrusion  of  ministers  upon  the 
 
428  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 footing  of  presentations  was  become  pretty  com- 
 mon, and  \;  ere  warmly  supported  by  the  Assem- 
 l)lies,  and  especially  by  their  commissions.  This 
 rendered  the  attempts  of  som-  l^resbyt^^ries  and 
 Synods  to  restrain  them  ineffectual.  The  kin^^, 
 having  the  patronage  of  very  many  parishes  in 
 his  hand,  such  ministers  as  expected  favours  from 
 the  court,  promoted  the  intrusions  with  all  their 
 might;  and,  in  judicatories,  and  printed  pam- 
 phlets, denied  and  railed  against  the  right  of  the 
 Christian  people  to  elect  their  own  pastors; 
 while  IMessrs.  Currie,  Hill,  and  others,  laboured 
 to  establish  that  right. 
 
 Finding  that  they  were  like  to  be  much  troubled 
 with  remonstrances,  dissents,  and  protestations, 
 in  Assemblies,  Commissions,  and  inferior  judica- 
 tories, the  Assembly,  1 780,  refused  to  record 
 them,  and  to  prevent  any  standing  testimonies 
 against  their  refusing  to  assert  the  truth,  in  di- 
 rect opposition  to  professor  Simson's  errors  and 
 blasphemies,  and  their  violent  procedure  in  the 
 intrusion  of  ministers,  they  enacted,  that  no  rea- 
 sons of  dissent  or  protest  should  be  recorded  in 
 their  minutes.  Several  remonstrances  and  peti- 
 tions were  given  in  to  the  Synods  of  INIerse  and 
 Lothian,  as  well  as  to  the  Assembly  1731,  but 
 no  way  regarded.  A  remonstrance  by  forty-two 
 ministers  and  throe  elders,  and  another  by  about 
 1600  Christian  people,  many  of  them  ruling  el- 
 ders, were  presented  to  the  Assembly  1  732,  in 
 which  they  represented  the  many  abounding  de- 
 fections, which  grieved  their  spirit,  as  well  as  dis- 
 honoured God,  and  tended  to  the  ruin  of  his 
 church,  and  begged,  that  the  Assembly  would 
 address  his  majesty  and  Parliament,  for  rescind- 
 ing their  acts  imposing  the  sacrainental  test  oh 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  4-29 
 
 the  members  of  this  church  ; —  estaMishiiii];  the 
 foleratlon^ — restorin*^  patronages^  and  lor  hiyini^ 
 aside  the  new  form  of  swearin*^  in  the  j^ospels, 
 — and  for  aHowino-  the  addresses  of  this  church, 
 though  not  directed  to  the  spiritual  Lords;  that 
 the  Assembly  would  exert  themselves  to  put  a 
 stop  to  the  intrusion  of  ministers  on  reciaiminp^ 
 congreg-ations;  would  restrain  commissions  from 
 countenancing  it,  even  where  neither  the  Pres- 
 bytery nor  congregation,  in  the  least,  concur  in 
 the  call,  trial,  or  ordination,  of  the  candidate  ; 
 that  no  appeals  from  Synods  be  judged  by  the 
 commission,  unless  the  members  of  that  sede- 
 runt be  supernumerary  to  these  of  the  Synod, 
 in  ministers,  as  well  as  elders  ;  that,  if  any  of 
 the  actings  of  the  commission  be  contrary  to  the 
 constitutions  and  known  principles  of  this  church, 
 they  shall  be  reversed,  and  themselves  censured  ; 
 that  instead  of  judicatories  being  condenmed  any 
 more  for  testifying  their  displeasure  at  candi- 
 dates's  offensive  acceptance  of  presentations,  none 
 may  be  licensed  or  ordained,  that  favour  that 
 course  ;  that  the  seventh  act  of  Assembly  1730, 
 prohibiting  the  recording  of  reasons  of  dissent 
 may  be  repealed  ;  that,  according  to  the  injunc* 
 tion  of  some  former  Assemblies,  an  act  may  be 
 made  to  restrain  the  legal  and  heathenish  man- 
 ner of  preaching  lately  introduced  by  some  young 
 ministers  and  preachers; — and  that  a  solemn  war- 
 ning be  emitted  by  the  Assembly  against  Pro- 
 fessor Simson's  errors,  and  others,  which  are 
 spread  through  the  land,  in  order  to  prevent  the 
 infection  of  them.  But  neither  of  tht^se  remon- 
 strances were  allowed  so  much  as  a  hearing.  But, 
 in  consequence  of  an  overture  of  the  preceding 
 Assembly,  not  a  little  worse  than  that  of  J  71  IK 
 
430  A   COMPKXniOlTS   HISTORY  OF, THE 
 
 and  contrary  to  the  instructions  of  most  part  of 
 Presbyteries  that  sent  any,  they  enacted,  that 
 Protestant  heritors,  of  any  denomination  or  char- 
 acter, and  elders,  should  be  the  onlij  electors  of  gos- 
 pel m blisters  This  act  was  reckoned  by  multi- 
 tudes an  overturning^  of  Christ's  spiritual  king- 
 dom, and  a  robbini^  of  his  people  of  their  spirit- 
 ual rights,  in  his  name  and  under  pretence  of 
 his  authority.  But  the  next  assembly  prohibit- 
 ed the  Presbytery  of  Dunfermline,  and  by  conse- 
 quence all  others,  to  administer  sealing  ordi- 
 nances to  any,  whose  conscience  hindered  them 
 to  submit  to  the  ministrations  of  an  intruder  vio- 
 lently imposed  upon  them. 
 
 Several  ministers,  in  sermons  before  synods  or 
 Presbyteries,  as  well  as  others,  testified  against 
 this  act  of  1732,  respecting  the  election  of  mi- 
 nisters. Among  others,  INIr.  Ebenezer  Erskine, 
 whose  evangelical,  clear,  and  majestic  manner 
 of  preaching,  made  him  highly  respected  by  the 
 people,  but  disliked  by  many  of  his  brethren,  in 
 his  sermon,  before  the  synod  of  Perth,  in  Octo- 
 ber, 1732,  testified  against  that  act,  and  ])atro- 
 nage,  and  some  other  prevalent  corruptions.  Af- 
 ter three  days'  warm  disputation,  the  synod  ap- 
 pointed him  to  be  rebuked  at  their  bar  for  the 
 matter  and  manner  of  the  quarreled  parts  of  his 
 sermon.  Twelve  ministiMs  and  two  e!d<Ms  dis- 
 sented. He  appealed  to  the  next  Assembly,  but 
 instead  of  receiving  any  redress  or  protection, 
 he  was  ordered  to  receive  a  rebuke.  Persuaded 
 that  the  truths  ot  (tocI,  which  he  had  maintained 
 in  his  sermon,  were  hereby  injured,  he  protested 
 that,  without  violating  his  conscience,  he  could  not 
 submit  to  the  Assembly's  sentence — an«.  that  he 
 should    be   at    liberty   to   give  like   testimonies 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  431 
 
 against  the  act,  1732,  or  otlier  defections,  on 
 any  proper  occasion.  Messrs.  William  W  ilsun  oC 
 Perth,  Alexander  INIoncrief  of  Abernelhy,  and 
 James  Fisher  of  Rinchiven,  for  exoneration  of 
 their  own  consciences,  also  protested  against  the 
 sentence.  Without  allowing  these  four  mini- 
 sters to  attempt  any  defence  of  their  conduct, 
 the  Assembly  appointed  their  Commission,  in 
 August  next,  to  proceed  against  them,  by  sus* 
 spension  or  liigher  censure,  if  they  did  not  re- 
 tract their  protest,  and  profess  their  sorrow  for 
 taking  it.  W^hen  the  Commission  met,  these 
 ministers  were,  with  great  difficulty,  allowed  to 
 represent  their  minds,  and  adhering  to  their  pro- 
 test, they  were  all  suspended  from  the  exercise 
 of  their  ministry.  The  Commission,  in  Novem- 
 ber, finding  them  still  impenitent,  did,  by  their 
 moderator's  casting  vote,  loose  them  from  their 
 relation  to  their  congregations.  They  protested 
 for  the  validiti/  of  their  office  and  continued  relci' 
 Hon  to  their  congregations,  and  declared  a  Sk- 
 ciiSsioN,  not  from  the  constitution  of  the  church 
 of  Scotland,  but  from  ihe  prevailing  parhj,  in  her 
 judicatories,  ay  and  until  they  should  return  to 
 their  duty — because,  1.  They  were  breaking  down 
 her  Presbyterian  constitution  of  church  govern- 
 ment— in  trampling  on  and  making  decisions 
 contrary  to  the  order  prescribed  by  her  hanier 
 laws,  enacted  in  her  purest  times,  for  securing  due 
 deliberation  in  forming  standing  laws  and  gene- 
 ral rules — in  exercising  a  lordly  power  over  the 
 consciencies  of  Christ's  people,  empowering  heri- 
 tors and  elders  to  impose  on  them  whatever  spi- 
 ritual  guides  and  pastors  they  pleased — in  pro- 
 moting violent  intrusions  of  ministers  on  re- 
 claiming congregations  ; — in  censuring  and  eject- 
 0 
 
432  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THK 
 
 ing  ministers  merely  for  their  protesting  against 
 
 a  sinful  act  of   Assembly  ; in  allowing  the 
 
 Commissions  to  usurp  the  power  of  Presby- 
 teries in  the  settlement  of  pastors,  if  they  re- 
 fused to  carry  on  violent  intrusions — and  in 
 threatening  the  highest  censures  to  such  as  ad- 
 ministered the  seals  of  God's  covenant  to  tlu^se 
 whose  conscience  hindered  them  from  subnvt- 
 ting  to  the  ministry  of  intruders.  2.  They  w  ere 
 pursuing  methods  evidently  tending  to  cor- 
 rupt the  doctrines  contained  in  their  own  Con- 
 fession  of  Faith — in  so  easily  dismissing  the  pro- 
 cess against  Professor  Simson,  and  refusing  judi- 
 cially to  assert  the  truth  in  opposition  to  his  er- 
 rors and  blasphemies — in  caressing  INIr.  Camp- 
 bel  while  he  spreads  his  erroneous  tenets — and 
 in  permitting  or  encouraging  preachers  to  enter- 
 tain their  hearers  with  dry  harangues  of  almost 
 mere  heathen  morality  instead  of  the  gospel  of 
 Christ.  3.  They  were  imposing  on  ministers 
 sinful  terms  of  communion,  and  breach  of  ordi- 
 nation vows,  in  requiring  them  to  forbear  proper 
 and  zealous  opposition  of  the  prevalent  course 
 of  apostacy  from  the  doctrine,  w  orship,  govern- 
 ment and  discipline,  of  this  church.  4.  They 
 continued  obstinate  in  their  evil  courses,  not- 
 withstanding all  ordinary  means  used  to  reclaim 
 them. 
 
 Deeply  affected  with  this  rent,  the  honest  par- 
 ty in  the  church,  exerted  themselvs,  to  their  ut- 
 most, in  the  choice  of  proper  members  for  the 
 next  Assembly,  in  order  to  have  the  leading 
 grievances  redressed,  and  the  breach  healed.  The 
 Assembly  1734,  not  without  great  opposition, 
 laboured  to  give  an  effectual  check  to  the  preva- 
 lent course  of  defection.     They   renewed  and 
 
CHXJRCH  OF  SCOTLAND,  IS$ 
 
 «ti^ngthcncd  the  old  acts  of  Assembly  I6ti9, 
 LGi^l,  IGD5,  1697,  J  700,  and  170.5,  which  liad 
 lieen  made  to  be  barriers  and  fences  of  our  con- 
 stitution a<^ainst  vinovatioiifi,  Tliey  rescinded 
 the  7th  act  of  Assembly  IG'30,  which  liindered 
 members  to  testify  against  wron^  deeds  of  judi- 
 catories, by  recording  tlieir  reasons  of  dissent, 
 because  it  was  not  made  according  to  these  bar- 
 rier acts.  And,  upon  the  same  account,  they  re- 
 pealed the  8th  act  of  Assembly  1 732,  above-men- 
 tioned, because  it  gave  too  much  countenance  Uh 
 violent  settlements,  and  too  much  power  to  dis- 
 iiffected  heritors,  and  was  unfavourable  to  the 
 liberties  of  the  Christian  })eople.  They  reverse*.! 
 a  violent  settlement  of  Auclitermuchty,  made  by 
 the  commission  against  the  will  of  the  congre- 
 •gation  and  Presbytery,  and  thus  declared  the 
 ileeds  of  the  commission  reversible.  They  had 
 probably  cast  out  some  otiier  intruders.  If  com- 
 plaints had  been  regularly  tabled  before  thern. 
 They  laid  commissions  under  some  new  regula- 
 tions, and  prohibited  them  to  execute  any  settle- 
 ments, when  the  Presbytery  or  Synod  of  the 
 bounds  declined  it.  They  empowered  the  Synod 
 0^  Perth  and  StirUng  to  restore  the  ibiir  ejected 
 ministers  to  their  charges,  without  requiring  any 
 acknowledgments  from  them, — which  was  soon 
 after  done.  The}',  by  an  act,  dechircl,  that  due 
 and  regular  ministerial  freedom  was  still  lelt  en- 
 tire, notwithstanding  the  acts  oi  17. ':J3  against 
 them.  They  appoint(»d  a  committee  to  furm  an 
 overture  for  the  right  preaching  of  the  g^)sj)el, 
 and  for  restraining  the  new-lashioned,  legaJ,  and 
 iicathenish  Iwirangues.  They  t^ijoined  their  com- 
 •mission  to  appoint  sl  national  fast,  which  hud 
 been  for  many  years  neglected^  that  alJ   rank^ 
 
"13^  A  COMPENDIOUS  HISTORY  OF  THE 
 
 miij^lit  nioiirn  for  the  prevailing  defections  of  the 
 church  and   land,  which   they  quickly  did,  but 
 many  of  the  court  party  neglected  to  observe  it. 
 They  also  empowered   their   commission    to  ad- 
 dress  the   king  and   Tarliament  for  relief  from 
 patronages,  which  they   did,  but  in  vain.     The 
 Assembly  1735,  appointed  the  Synod  of  Fife  to 
 grant  sealing  ordinances  to  the  people  of  Kinross, 
 as  they    shall  find  most  for  edification — and  let- 
 ters were  sent   to  some  Presbyteries,  allowing 
 them  to  treat  others  who  had  been  oppressed  by 
 violent  settlements,  in   the  same  manner.     The 
 Assembly   1736,  by  an  act,  declared  it  the  prin- 
 ciples of  this  church,  T/iat  no  viiniscer  should  be 
 intruded  into  any  parish  contrarij  to   the  uill  of 
 the  congregation.     By  their  7th  act,  they  enjoin 
 ministers   and   preachers   to   warn   tlieir  hearers 
 against  any  thing  that  ter^ds  to  Atheism,  Deism, 
 Arianism,    Socinianism,    Armiiiianism,    Bourig- 
 nianism,  Popery,  Su[)erstition,  Antinomianism, — 
 and  to  insist  in  their  sermons  on  man's  lost  es- 
 tate  by   nature,  the    necessity    of  supernatural 
 grace,   and    ot    faith  in  the  imputed  righteous- 
 ness of  Christ, — and    chiefly  h:b(?ur  to   lead  sin- 
 ners from  the  covenant  of  works  to  that  uf  grace 
 for  life  and  salvation,  and  from  sin  and  self  to 
 Christ  as  a  surety  and  saviour  ; — and  in  j^ressing 
 holiness,   to   shew   them   their   inability  lor  and 
 aversion  to  every  thing  spiritually  good,  and  that 
 iniion  with  Christ  is  the  true  and  only  source  of 
 all  grace  and  holiness — and  that  men's  best  per- 
 formances and  attainments  are  but  loss  and  dung 
 in     point     of   justification    before    God.       And 
 tluy  enjoin  professors  of  divinity  to  instruct  their 
 students  in  preaching   the  gospel  according  to 
 this  act ;  and  require  Presbyteries,  at  their  pri- 
 
CHURCH   OF   SCOTLAND.  435 
 
 vy  censures,  to  inquire  concerninor  the  observa- 
 tion of  it.  But  the  countenance  given  by  tliese 
 two  last  Assemblies  to  some  violent  intrusions, 
 or  to  Professor  Campbell's  errors,  made  their 
 good  acts  little  regarded;  and  made  the  four 
 seceding  ministers  lose  all  inclinations  or 
 hopes  of  returning  to  the  fellowship  of  the 
 church. 
 
 Meanwhile,  one  captain  Porleous,  a  most  aban- 
 doned profligate,  had  been  condemned  to  death  for 
 several  murders,  but  had  been  reprieved  for  a  time, 
 by  the  interest  of  some  great  men.  Provoked  here- 
 by, the  mob,  conducted  by  some  skilful  leaders, 
 lianged  him  at  Edin'ourgh  in  September,  1736. 
 Enraged  by  their  bohi  conduct,  and  perhaj)s, 
 groundlessly  apprehensive  that  some  of  the  more 
 strict  ministers,  who  det(?sted  the  reprieving  of 
 such  a  notorious  murderer,  l>ad  encouraged  the 
 mob,  the  king  and  Parliament,  having  framed  an 
 act  for  the  discovery  of  his  murderers,  aj)pointed 
 all  the  ministers  of  Scotland  to  read  it  in  the 
 time  of  God  s  public  worship  in  their  churches, 
 every  first  Sabbath  in  the  month,  for  a  whole 
 year,  beginning  in  August,  17S7,  under  this  pe- 
 nalty, for  the  first  day's  neglect.  That  tJici/  shall 
 he  declared  incapable  of  sitting  or  •i^i^lijig  in  anj/ 
 church  judicatory/.  JNIany  ministei^v  looking  on 
 several  things  in  the  act  as  inconsistcFit  u  ith 
 justice  and  equity  ;  and  that  it  was  not  j)roper 
 for  Christ's  ambassadors  of  the  gospel  of  peace, 
 to  become  heralds  or  executors  of  the  sanguinary 
 laws  of  men  ;  that  the  reading  of  such  a  civil  act 
 from  the  pul|)it,  on  the  Lord's  day,  in  the  time 
 of  divine  service,  was  a  profanation  of  his  Sab- 
 bath and  worship  ;  and  tliat  they  could  not  ac- 
 quiesce in  the  penalty  annexed  to  the  first  ne- 
 
I3G  A  COxMTKNDIOUS  HISTonY  OV  TFTK 
 
 glcct,  w'ithocit  practically  owning"  the  civil  ma-- 
 V^hir?i\.{:  head  nf  Ihe  rhurch,  having  power  to  fi?c 
 the  qualifications  and  conditions  of  ministers'  ex- 
 ercise of  their  office  in  /[governing'  the  church  of 
 God,  which  they  reckonecf,  at  once  contrary  to 
 the  estahlished  doctrine  of  this  church,  and  to 
 their  own  solemn  engagements  to  maintain  it. 
 Many  others,  especially  such  as  had,  or  wished 
 for,  court  favour,  made  a  shift  to  come  over  those 
 scruples,  and  read  at  least  part  of  the  act,  the 
 whole  or  part  of  the  time.  These  different  views 
 and  practices  produced  some  alienation  hetween 
 the  parties  for  a  time ;  hut,  after  a  ^ew  years, 
 they  liavmoniously  agreed  to  bnry  it  in  oblivion. 
 The  Seceding  ministers*  publication  of  their 
 second  TesHmonjfy  in  which  they  had  represented 
 the  backslidings  of  church  and  state  frorr>  their 
 covenanted  doctrine,  worship,  discipline,  and  go- 
 vernment, and  laudable  acts  and  constitutions 
 for  supijorting-  it,  more  plainly  than  most  of  the 
 established  clergy  wished, — and  their  supplying- 
 of  people  with  sermon,  who  could  not  submit  to 
 intruders,  or  scru])led  to  hear  the  readers  of  the 
 act  concerning  captain  Porteous, — having  highly 
 displeased  the  ecciesiabtical  managers, — the  As- 
 sembly )7S8  therefore  appointed  their  commis- 
 sion to  libel  and  cite  them  to  the  next  Assem- 
 bly. When  they,  now  increased  to  the  number 
 of  eight,  appeared  at  the  bar,  they  were  informed 
 by  tiie  Assembly  IToD,  that  they  were  ready  to 
 drop  all  that  was  contained  in  their  libel  and 
 every  thing  bygone,  and  recx^ive  them  with  open 
 arms,  providing  they  would,  for  the  future,  Ibr- 
 ])ear  all  separating  courses,  and  join  in  the  com- 
 munion of  the  church.  But,  instead  of  such  com- 
 ^^liance,  these  ministers  solemnly  declined  the 
 
CHURCH  OF  SCOTLANO.  437 
 
 Assembly  and  otiier  established  judicatories,  as 
 not  right  constitute  courts  of  Christ  in  their  pre- 
 sent condition,  because  instead  of"  purging  out, 
 they  received  and  supported,  intruders  and  other 
 scandalous  persons,  as  mem!>ers  ;  because  they 
 had  generally,  for  many  years  past,  been  active 
 in  carrying  on  a  course  of  defection,  tolerating 
 the  erroneous,  countenancing  error,  and  enact- 
 ing laws,  by  which  the  liberties  of  Christ's  mini- 
 sters and  people  were  suppressed  ;  and  because, 
 by  their  reading  of  the  Parliament's  act  concern- 
 ing captain  Porteous,  they  had  submitted  tl^em- 
 selves  to  the  civil  magistrate,  as  head  of  t]ic 
 cintrch,  instead  of  Christ.  This  declinature  so  gall- 
 ed the  managers  and  others  of  the  prevailing 
 party,  that,  without  finding  them  guilty  of  ciiher 
 error  in  doctrine,  w  scandal  in  practice,  the  As- 
 sembly 1740  deposed  them  from  all  exercise  of 
 their  ministerial  office  in  this  church. 
 
 Since  tliat  period  things  have  been  nothing 
 bettered,  but  rather  grown  worse.  While  prac- 
 tical godliness  in  persons  and  families  hath  sadly 
 decayed,  and  error  and  impiety  of  almost  every 
 kind  have  prevailed,  and  become  fashionable, 
 settlements  of  ministers  have  proceeded  on  the 
 footing  of  Patronage.  But  long  custom  hath  ren- 
 dered these,  and  all  their  soul-ruining  consequen- 
 ces, less  affecting,  even  to  many  of  the  godly. 
 Errors,  and  even  scandalous  practices,  unless  ex- 
 tremely gross,  ordinarily  pass  uncensured.  Viola- 
 tions of  these  commands,  which  immediately  res- 
 pect (iod  himself,  are  by  many  reckoned  very 
 venial,  or  no  transgressions.  Little  more  than 
 gross  acts  of  murder,  or  approaches  to  it :  gross 
 and  notorious  uncleanness,  and  especially  di- 
 rect theft  and  robbery,  is  practically  held  as  either 
 
438  A  COMrENDIOUS   HISTORY  OF  THR 
 
 censurable  by  the  church,  or  punishable  by  th^ 
 state.     The  Seceders  have  now  about  two  hun- 
 dred ministers  settled  in  Britain    and    Ireland, 
 besides    others    in    America.      But  their   falling 
 from  their  first  love,  indulirence  of  conformity  to 
 the  world,  and  their  anc^ry  divisions  about  thing's 
 which  many  of  themselves  do  not  fully   under- 
 stand, have  cxceeding-ly  marred  their  usefulness 
 in  maintaining-  Christ's  injured  truths,  and  win- 
 jiing-  souls  to  his  service.     The   Reformed   Pres- 
 bytery  was  formed  about    1713,   by    IMr.  John 
 jM'Millan  above-mentioned,  and  Thomas  Nairn, 
 who  left  the  Secession.     In  many  things  they  re- 
 semble the  Seceders,  but  differ  from  them,  in  im- 
 pugning" the  present  civil  government.      Their 
 splitting  into  parties,  on  a  debate  concerning- the 
 extent  oj  ChrisCs  deaths  weakened   these  old  dis- 
 senters^  as   they  call   themselves,  and    retarded 
 their  increase.     The  Presl)ytery  of  Relief  origi- 
 nated from  j\rr.  Thomas  Gillespy,  whom  the  Ge- 
 neral  Assembly   in    1751    deposed,    because    he 
 would  not,  contrary  to  his  conscience,  assist  in  a 
 violent  intrusion, — and  some  other   ministers  of 
 the  church  of  Scotland,  who,  at  their  own  hand, 
 left  their  established  charges,  and  took   up   with 
 such    people   as   invited   them    in    other    places. 
 Their  scheme  of  admittin;^   persons   of  ditfeient 
 denominations  to  sealirig  ordinances,  and  g"iving 
 their  people  an  answerable  allowance  in   hearing 
 and  joinin«2^  in  sealing  ordinances,  is  excctulingly 
 
 suited  to  the  taste  of  the  age. But  divisions 
 
 and  other  incidents  have  not  a  little  retarded 
 their  expected  increase.  Besides  all  these,  there 
 are,  I  think,  between  twenty  and  thirty  thousand 
 Papists,  who,  notwithstanding^   all  the  laudable 
 
CHURCH  OK  SCOTLAND.  439 
 
 diligence  of  the  Society  for  propagating;'  Christian 
 Knowledge  in  that  country,  tlo  chiefly  swarm  in 
 the  north.  How  nianv  Epicopalian  minsters  or 
 people  there  be  in  Scotland  at  present,  1  do  not 
 certainly  know. 
 
 KXD  OK  THE  HISTORY  OF  THE  CHURCH  OK  SCOTLAND. 
 
ADVERTISEMENT. 
 
 The  Historical  Account  of  the  Rise  and.  Pro 
 gress  of  the  Secession^  by  the  Rev,  John  Brown  of 
 Haddington^  is  so  intiinaiely  Connccfed  with  the 
 History/  of  the  Church  of  Scotland,  tJiat  it  has  been 
 lho7ight  proper  to  annex  it  to  the  present  volume, — 
 Ami  the  Publishers  flatter  Uiem&elves  that  it  xvill  he 
 c'07isideredf  by  iJie  Public^  as  a  valuable  addition 
 to  his  History  of  the  Scottish  Church:  the  work  of 
 ^^  a  man  wlio^''  says  07ie  of  his  biographers,  *^  though 
 ^^  firm  in  his  adherence  to  what  he  judged  to  be  truth, 
 *•  and  strenuous  in  its  defence,  tms  at  Vie  same  time 
 *'  the  friend  of  forbearance  boih  in  principle  and 
 **  pracliccJ^ 
 
AN 
 
 HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT 
 
 OF    THE 
 
 RISE   AND    PROGRESS 
 
 OF  TUE 
 
 SECESSION. 
 
 MR.  JOHN  BROWN, 
 
 LATE   MINISTER  OF  TUE  GOSPEI-  AT  IIAUDINGTOK. 
 
HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT 
 
 RISE   AND    PROGRESS 
 
 SECESSION 
 
 1  HE  connection  of  the  Secession  with  former 
 events,  renders  necessary  a  rehearsal  of  a  variety 
 of  facts,  prior  to  the  date  of  it. — Our  reformers 
 not  only  published,  but  procured  tlie  estabbsh- 
 ment  of  the  doctrines  of  Christ,  maintained  by 
 Calvin,  in  their  Confession  of  Faith  :  they  also 
 introduced  his  scriptural  plan  of  Presbyterian 
 church-i^overnment ;  according  to  which,  every 
 minister  has  ccpial  power,  and  acconbiiii;-  to  which 
 the  ecclesiastical  courts  of  Sessions,  Presbyteries, 
 and  Synods,  are  held  of  divine  authority;  and 
 subordinated  the  former  to  the  latter. 
 
 'JMie  i;reat  lines  of  this  plan  they  marked  out, 
 in  their  fust  book  of  discnpline  :  a  more  clear  and 
 distinct  delineation  thereof  they  gave  in  their  sc- 
 
4  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 cond;  whicli  every  minister  amorjf^  tliem  was 
 required  to  subscribe.  An  express  parliamentary 
 ratification  of  this  form  of  church-government, 
 they,  after  no  small  stru^-^lin^',  at  last  obtained 
 in  J. 592.  In  direct  contradiction,  however,  to 
 their  second  book  of  discipline,  patronage  was 
 confirmed,  and  sundry  other  evils  not  fully  abo- 
 lished. 
 
 Quickly  after,  partly  by  fraud,  partly  by  force. 
 King  James  gradually  pulled  down  the  Presby- 
 terian form  of  church-government,  and  set  up  the 
 Episcopalian  in  its  stead.  He  assumed  a  spiritual 
 headship  over  all  persons  and  causes  in  the  church. 
 This  the  parliament  required  many  of  the  sub- 
 jects to  acknowledge  by  oath.  The  simple  and 
 scriptural  form  of  worship,  introduced  by  our  re- 
 formers, he  began  to  exchange  for  the  supersti- 
 tious one  of  the  English.  By  his  influence,  a  ge- 
 neral assembly  at  Perth,  chiefly  composed  of  his 
 own  creatures,  admitted  the  five  subsequent  arti- 
 cles, viz.  kneeling  at  theLord's Supper;  privatead- 
 ministration  of  it  to  sick  persons ;  private  admi- 
 nistration of  baptism  to  distressed  infants  ;  con- 
 firmation of  children  by  the  laying  on  of  the  hands 
 of  the  Bishop  ;  and  the  annual  celebration  of  five 
 holidays,  commemorating  the  nativity,  death,  re- 
 surrection, and  ascension  of  Christ,  and  the  mira- 
 culous descent  of  the  Holy  Ghost.  These,  from 
 the  place  where  they  were  enacted,  are  ordina- 
 rily termed.  The  Articles  of  Perth. 
 
 James  had  not  finished  his  intended  model- 
 ling of  our  church,  when  death  cut  him  oft'.  His 
 son  Charles  I.  Avith  the  assistance  of  Archbishop 
 Laud,  bestirred  himself,  to  render  her  altogether 
 E?iglish,  or  rather  a  little  ?no?'e  Romish.  Fired 
 with  indignationat  the  tyrannical  imposition  of 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION.  5 
 
 lialf-popish  canons  and  liturgy,  many  of  all  ranks 
 in  Scotland  took  the  alarm.    With  the  most  hold, 
 though  i)atient  struggling,  they  at  last  obtained 
 the  royal  indiction  of  a  free  assembly  and  par- 
 liament.    The  assembly  meeting  first  in  1088, 
 had  plenty  of  rubbish  to  remove: — The  national 
 covenant,  sworn  a  little  before,   referred  a  vast 
 deal  of  matter  to  their  consideration.     The  six 
 packed  meetings  of  the  general  assembly,  which 
 assisted  King  James  to  deform  the  church,  they 
 annulled.     The  liturgy,  the  book  of  canons,  and 
 of  ordination  ;  the  unlawful  oaths  of  entrants  to 
 the  curacy;  the  ofiice  of  Bishops;  the  High  Com- 
 mission-court ;  and  civil  offices  of  kirk  men,  they 
 condemned.     The  most  active  ringleaders  in  the 
 former  apostacy,  they  censured.    All  the  Bishops 
 were  cited  to  their  bar;  and,  notwithstanding  of 
 whatever  themselves,  or  the  King's  commissioner 
 could  do,  in  their  behalf,  nine  of  them  were  ex- 
 communicated, three  of  tliem  deposed  from  all 
 office  in  the  church,  two  of  them  deposed  from 
 their  Episcopal  function,  and  suspended  from  the 
 ministry.  The  assembly,  moreover,  restored  kirk- 
 sessions    and    synods,    provincial    and   national, 
 agreeable  to  the  order  prescribed  in  the  second 
 book  of  discipline;  and  revived  or  enacted  a  num- 
 ber of  excellent  rules  for  maintaining  the  order 
 and  purity  of  the  church.     They  not  only  con- 
 tinued their  meeting  after  the  King's  commis- 
 sioner pretended  to  dissolve  it,  but  expressly  af- 
 firmed their  divine,  ecclesiastical,  and  civil  au- 
 thority, to  hold  general  assemblies,  whenever  it 
 is  necessary.   They  nevertheless  avowed  that  the 
 King,  though  a  bigot  for  Prelacy,  had  power  to 
 call  and  convene  such  courts;  and  in  case  he  call- 
 ed one  next  year,  they  agreed  to  desert  the  diet, 
 
6  AN  IirSTOniCAL   ACCOUNT  OF   THE 
 
 which   themselves   had  fixed,   and  observe  that 
 wJiich  his  Majesty  should  appoint. 
 
 This    faithiul    assembly    of    Glasgow,    Ring 
 Charles  proclaimed  to  be,  after  his  Commission- 
 er's dissolution  thereof,    an  unlawful  and  sedi- 
 tious meeting;    nor  did   any   of  the   reforming 
 parliaments    ever    acknowledge    its    authority. 
 The  substance  of  its  principal  acts  the  assembly 
 1639  threw  together  into  a  new  act,  and  soften- 
 ed some  of  the  expressions.    This  the  parliament 
 161-0  explicitly  ratified.     They  also  revived  the 
 fore-mentioned  act  of  1592,  in  all  the  points  and 
 articles  thereof;  and  expressly  declared,  that  the 
 sole  and  only  power  and  jurisdiction  within  this 
 kirk,  stands  in  her  sessions,  Presbyteries,  synods, 
 and  general  assemblies.     With  one  consent  both 
 church  and  state   went  forward,  promoting  re- 
 formation, and  suppressing  Popery,  Prelacy,  and 
 profaneness ;  and  prompted  their  neighbours  in 
 'England  and  Ireland  to   follow  their  example. 
 The  Westminster  Confession  of  Faith  and  Cate- 
 chisms, with  their  Directory  for  Worship,  were 
 ratified  by  both  church  and  state.     The  West- 
 minster Form  of  Church'govermncnt  was  expressly 
 received  by  the  church;  but  never  ratified  by  our 
 state. 
 
 For  eleven  years  of  this  reforming  period,  pa- 
 tronage retained  its  legal  force  ;  nay,  by  some 
 acts,  both  church  and  state,  directly  or  indirect- 
 ly, approved  it.  Care  was,  however,  taken,  that 
 no  minister  should  be  obtruded  upon  the  Chris- 
 tian  peoi)le  against  their  will.  In  1619,  the  par- 
 liainent  entirely  abolished  it  as  a  Popish  custom, 
 and  an  oppressive  grievance  to  the  people  of  God. 
 In  eonsctpicnee  liereof,  the  assembly  that  year 
 IVamed  a  Directory  for  the  election  of  ministers ; 
 
RISE   AND   PROGRESS  OF  THE    SECESSION.  7 
 
 which,  it  is  presumed,  ascribes  to  the  session 
 more  power  than  is  allowed  them,  by  the  ora- 
 cles of  Christ. 
 
 Nothing  so  much  distinguished  our  ancestors, 
 as  their  public  covenanting  with  God.  Divinely 
 assured,  that,  in  the  days  of  Moses,  Joshun,  Asa, 
 Joash,  Josiah,  and  Nehemiah,  the  Hebrews  had, 
 with  his  approbation,  thus  dedicated  themselves 
 and  their  seed  to  the  Lord:  Convinced  that  pub- 
 lic covenanting  is  no  where,  in  the  sacred  page, 
 represented  as  a  ceremonial  service,  and  so  must 
 be  equally  lawful  under  the  N^ew  dispensation  as 
 under  the  Old:  Convinced  that  it  was  expressly 
 j)romised  to  take  place  under  the  Gospel*  ;  and, 
 with  apostolic  approbation,  was  probably  prac- 
 tised in  the  INIacedonian  church  j  :  Convinced, 
 that  if  subjects,  on  proper  occasions,  may  enter 
 into  a  solemn  association  and  bond,  to  promote 
 the  service,  honour,  and  safety  of  their  Sove- 
 reign, the  professed  subjects  of  Jesus  Christ, 
 may,  in  a  social  manner,  devote  themselves  to 
 promote  his  interest  and  honour:  Convinced, 
 that  if  a  number  of  purchasers  at  once  may  take 
 out  a  charter  for  their  property,  wherein  they 
 constitute  themselves  and  their  heirs  the  v.':ssals 
 of  a  Prince,  Duke  or  Lord;  there  can  be  nothing 
 unreasonable  if  a  number  of  men  take  hold  of  the 
 everlasting  covenant,  and  God  in  it,  for  their 
 God,  and  the  God  of  their  seed;  and  hereon  de- 
 vote themselves  and  posterity  to  be  his  honmir- 
 able  vassals  and  servants:  Convinced,  that  if  one 
 man  may  solemnly  devote  himself  to  his  .Maker, 
 himdreds,  nay,  tiiousands,  may  do  so  together: 
 Convinced,  that  if  one,  or  nidic  may  in  b.i!»li>iii 
 
 "    \>n.  \\\     IS,  21.  «.  ..r.   ..11.    .. 
 
8  AN    HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF   THE 
 
 surrender  his  seed  to  tlie  Lord,  a  whole  nation 
 may  surrender  their  posterity  to  him; — therefore 
 
 they  did  so  in  their  public  covenants. Alway 
 
 supposini^  such  vows  good  in  their  matter,  plain 
 in  their  form,  seasonable  in  their  juncture,  and 
 taken  in  truth,  judgment,  and  righteousness,  our 
 ancestors  were  convinced,  the  three  first  precepts 
 of  the  moral  law  approved  thereof.  The  first 
 requires  us  to  avouch  the  Lord  to  be  our  God  ; — 
 why  may  not  a  number  do  this  together  ?  The 
 second  enjoins  our  receiving,  observing,  and  keep- 
 ing pure  and  entire,  the  ordinances  of  God's 
 worship; — why  may  we  not  vow  to  be  faithful  to 
 this  trust,  and  to  cleave  to  the  Lord?  Especially, 
 when  the  third  requires  us  to  swear  hi/  his  name, 
 and  voio  to  the  mightij  God  of  Jacob. 
 
 Our  ancestors  knew,  that  the  seasons  of  pub- 
 lic covenanting,  specified  in  Scripture,  were  af- 
 ter signal  deliverances  ;  amidst  threatenings  of 
 sore  trials  and  heavy  judgments  ;  or  when  ear- 
 nestly endeavouring  to  withstand,  or  reform  from 
 signal  corruptions.  They  thought  the  occasions 
 whereon  they  practised  it,  tallied  therewith. 
 When  the  Popish  powers  abroad  were  forming 
 their  league,  to  extirpate  the  Protestant  cause, 
 and  its  adherents;  was  it  unseasonable  for  King 
 .James,  and  his  council,  prompted  by  the  church, 
 to  set  on  foot  the  national  covenant,  or  for  the 
 church  to  re(|uiie  the  subscription  thereof? — 
 When  King  Charles,  Achbishop  Laud,  and  their 
 creatures,  combined  to  bury  the  pure  worship 
 of  God,  the  Presbyterian  form  of  church  govern- 
 ment, and  the  civil  liberties  of  the  nation,  was  it 
 unseasonable  for  the  tables  of  the  nobles  to  set  on 
 foot   the  renovation  of   the   national   covenant  ; 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECF.SSIoy.  9 
 
 and  stir  up  their  brethren,  to  swear  to  maintain 
 these  valuable  points  ? 
 
 With  respect  to  the  matter  of  their  (M)vcnant?, 
 our  fathers  were  ready  to  defy  their  adversaries, 
 to  show  them  any  thin^  rcnouna'd,  that  was  not 
 prohibited  by  the  divine  law  ;  or  any  thini^  es- 
 jyoused,  that  was  not  therein  required.  \n  1.580 
 and  1581,  Popery  in  i^eneral,  and  in  many  par- 
 ticular heads,  >vas  abjured  ;  and  the  Protestant 
 religion,  in  doctrine,  worslii[),  discipline,  and 
 government,  then  professed,  was  sworn  to.  h\ 
 1590  an  engagement  to  defend  the  King's  person 
 and  authority  was  subjoined.  In  159G  they  con- 
 fessed their  various  sins,  and  engaged  to  walk 
 more  circumspectly  for  the  future.  In  16:^8  the 
 maintenance  of  the  true  Protestant  religion,  and 
 of  the  civil  authority  of  King  Charles,  then  a 
 Prelatic  persecutor ;  an  opposition  to  Laud's  ca- 
 nons and  liturgy  ;  and  a  forbearance  of  some  no- 
 vations already  introduced,  till  tried  and  allowed 
 in  a  free  general  assembly  :  together  with  the 
 leading  of  holy  and  exemplary  lives ;  and  the  as- 
 sistance and  defence  of  one  another,  in  fuUilling 
 these  vows — were  sworn  to  and  engaged.  Epis- 
 copal government,  the  five  articles  of  Perth,  and 
 the  civil  places  and  power  of  kirkmen  (whose 
 lawfulness  was  left  undetermined  in  the  cove- 
 nant  1638,  in  order  that  Episcopals,  as  well 
 as  others,  might  take  it)  being  condemned  by  the 
 assembly  that  year,  the  covenant  was  afterward 
 subscribed,  as  importing  a  renunciation  ul  these 
 novations. 
 
 In  the  solemn  league,  most  of  the  Scots,  and 
 multitudes  in  England  and  Ireland,  swore,  in 
 their  places  and  callings,  to  endeavour  the  pre- 
 servation of  religion  in  Scotland,  and  the  refor- 
 
I©  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 mation  of  it  in  England  and  Ireland,  according 
 to  the  word  of  God,  and  tlie  example  of  the  best 
 reformed  churches  ;  and  so  promote  an  unifor- 
 mity of  religion  in  all  the  three  kingdoms,  that 
 they  and  their  children  might  live  together  in 
 faith  and  love,  and  the  Lord  delight  to  dwell 
 among  them. 
 
 They  engaged,  in  their  respective  stations,  to 
 endeavour  the  abolishing  of  Popery,  Prelacy, 
 superstition,  heresy,  schism,  profaneness,  or  what- 
 ever else  is  contrary  to  sound  doctrine  and  the 
 power  of  Godliness.  They  swore  to  promote  the 
 peace  of  the  nation  ;  to  support  the  authority  of 
 the  King,  and  the  privileges  of  the  parliament ; 
 and  to  promote  union  among  themselves  in  pro- 
 secuting these  laudable  ends. — In  164-8  the  Scots, 
 purged  of  many  rotten-hearted  professors,  by  the 
 English  defeat  of  Duke  Hamilton's  engagement, 
 undertaken  in  favour  of  King  Charles  I.  made 
 an  extensive  acknowledgment  of  their  breaches 
 of  the  solemn  league  :  Error,  heresy,  schism.  In- 
 dependency, Anabaptism,  Antinomianism,  Fami- 
 lism,  Libertinism,  Scepticism,  and  Erastianism, 
 then  rampant  in  Britain,  were  abjured  ;  the 
 maintenance  of  King  Charles,  still  a  strict  Epis- 
 copalian, hisauth(»rity,  and  of  the  liberties  of  both 
 church  and  state,  uas  engaged  to.  What  thing 
 vnlawful  is  here  espoused  ?  What  thing  lawful  is 
 here  renounced  ?  What  is  here  sworn  to,  that  is 
 not  implied  in  the  ordination  vows  of  every  mi- 
 nister of  the  established  (hurch?  What  that  is 
 not  implied  in  every  candid  adherence  to  the 
 Westminster  Confession  of  Faith  ?  What  that  is 
 not  implied  in  every  proper  baptismal  engagement.^ 
 
 Whatever  rigour  they  used,  in  imposing  these 
 covenants;  whatever  allowance  they  gave  any  to 
 
RISE    AND   PROGRKSS  OF   THH   SECESSION.       11 
 
 swear  them,  who  did  not  understand  iheni,  or 
 who  did  not  appear  inclined  to  perform  his  vows, 
 must  never  be  justified.  It  is  certain  they  were 
 less  culpable  on  these  heads  than  many  su[)pose. 
 Notwithstanding  of  the  compulsory  laws,  1  scarce 
 find  an  instance  of  any  forced  to  take  the  cove- 
 nants, except  by  JNTontrose  and  Monro,  who  were 
 military  men,  anti  both  of  them  at  last  noted 
 enemies  to  the  genuine  covenanters.  It  is  cer- 
 tain multitudes  took  these  covenants  with  cheer- 
 fulness, knowledge,  and  candour;  and  that  sur- 
 prising evidence  of  sobriety,  and  serious  godli- 
 ness, appeared  among  them  ;  prayerless  and  pro- 
 fane persons,  or  families,  were  held  as  a  detes- 
 table nuisance.  Their  very  armies  resendjled  a 
 congregation  of  saints.  Multitudes  sufl'ered  to 
 the  death,  for  adhering  to  these  vows,  and  died 
 rejoicing  in  God  their  Saviour.  Whom  God  thus 
 honoured,  let  not  us  dare  to  calumniate  as  fools, 
 and  lavish  of  their  lives. 
 
 The  ratification  of  these  covenants  I)y  the  state, 
 on  some  ol"  the  covenanting  occasions,  no  doubt 
 inferred  a  civil  security  of  the  religion  therein 
 espoused,  even  as  the  ratification  of  the  Confes- 
 sion of  Faith,  and  other  subordinate  standards, 
 inferred  a  civil  security  to  the  Protestant  reli- 
 gion therein  exhibited  But  as  the  latter  makes 
 not  the  Protestant  religion  a  mere  state  religion; 
 neither  did  the  former  render  the  covenants 
 merely  state  covenants.  In  the  national,  the  co- 
 venanters expressly  declare,  that  therein  they 
 join  themselves  to  the  true  protestant  (  hur(  h,  os 
 livi'h/  menihrrs  of  the  same  in  Christ  thi  ir  Head. 
 Times  without  number,  they  represent  their 
 engagements  as  covenants  wrni  (ion,  which  ne- 
 cessarily infers  their    reckoning  them  reli^ivus. 
 
12  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  Till!: 
 
 not  state  covenants,  uhich  cannot  be  made  with 
 God.  without  sup[)osin^"  a  renovation  of  the  Jew- 
 ish Theocracy,  in  which  God  sustained  the  cha- 
 racter of  princijial  3Iai;istrate.  In  J. 596,  and 
 I^SSy  the  most  noted  occasions  of  covenantinp;', 
 they  were  not  so  much  as  influenced  by  the 
 smallest  injunction  from  the  state.  In  It;  1-3 
 and  164S  the  other  two  most  remarkaljle  sea- 
 sons thereof,  the  ecclesiastical  authority  had  the 
 lead,  and  the  civil  did  little  else  than  add  its 
 sanction  to  what  appointments  the  church  had 
 made.  And  in  every  period,  ministers,  not  states- 
 men, were  the  ordinary  administrators  of  these 
 oaths. 
 
 In  this  covenanting  work,  they  never  intend- 
 ed a  mere  acknoiuledgment  of  the  obligation  of  the 
 divine  lau\  with  respect  to  the  duties  contained 
 in  their  covenant;  !iut  a  morestrict  bindingoftheiiu 
 selves  to  these  necessary  duties,  bij  a  new  and  supers 
 added  obligation.  An  obligation  not  increasino^ 
 the  original  obligation  of  the  divine  law  to  these 
 duties,  but  one  entirely  distinct  from,  and  su- 
 peradded thereto.  In  this  view  have  all  na- 
 tions of  mankind,  in  all  ages,  made  use  of  secon- 
 dary obligations,  af  promises,  ])onds,  vows,  pro- 
 missory oaths,  as  means  of  more  deeply  impress- 
 ing the  original  mandates  of  the  law  of  nature  or 
 revelation,  by  the  constitution  of  a  new,  solemn, 
 and  distinct  obligation,  which  cannot  be  violat- 
 ed, without  superadding  the  new  and  distinct 
 crimes  of  infidelity,  treachery,  and  perjury,  to 
 that  of  rebellion  against,  and  disobt^dience  to, 
 the  original  revpiirement  of  tlie  moral  law.  The 
 obligation  of  the  divine  law  to  perform  the  du- 
 ties contained  in  the  covenants  was  the  same 
 thousands  of  years  ere  they  were  thought  of,  and 
 
niSE  AND   PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       13 
 
 would  have  been  the  same,  suppose  they  hatl  ne- 
 ver been  thought  of,  anil  is  entirely  divine.  The 
 law  of  God  warrants  the  eonstitution  of  tlie  ob- 
 ligation of  lawful  covenants  to  duty ;  and  when 
 it  is  constituted  recjuires  the  fulfilment  thereof; 
 and  enforces  the  same  with  a  divine  sanction  of 
 rewards,  in  case  of  fulfilment,  and  of  punishment, 
 in  case  of  breach.  But  tiiis  obligation,  and  which 
 alone  is  the  ohlif^aiion  of  the  covenant,  iiath  no  ex- 
 istence before  the  first  covenanting  act,  and  is 
 constituted  by  it.  'J'he  divine  obbgation  of  the 
 moral  law  extends  ecjually  to  all  men.  The  ob- 
 ligation of  covenants  being  constituted  by  a  hu- 
 man act,  in  obedience  to  the  law  of  God,  extends 
 only  to  such  as  either  immediately  or  mediately 
 engage  in  those  covenants*,  and  relates  only  to 
 this  imperfect  state. 
 
 That  the  obligation  of  the  national  covenant 
 and  solemn  league  is  perpetual,  binding  the 
 whole  nation,  in  this  and  succeeding  ages,  is  evi- 
 dent. 
 
 1.  The  things  covenanted  are  duties  required 
 in  the  law  of  God  ;  and  so  it  cannot  but  be  for 
 the  honour  of  God,  and  the  good  of  the  nation, 
 and  every  person  therein,  they  be  perpetually  ob- 
 served. 
 
 2.  These  covenants  were  public  deeds  of  our 
 fathers,  who  had  power  to  dedicate  us  to  the 
 Lord,  in  that  manner,  as  well  as  in  bajjtism. — 
 And  from  God\s  ancient  grant  of  the  nation  to 
 his  Son,  Psal.  ii.  8.  Isa.  xlii.  I.  cVc.  they  had 
 strong  encouragement  to  do  so.  The  covenant- 
 ing work  in  Scotland  was  so  often  repeated,  and 
 on  some  occasions,  particularly  in  Ui.'58,  so  uni- 
 
 *  See  SvnoU's  Catechism  on  ihirU  Command. 
 
14  AX   IIISTOUICAL   ACCOUNT  OF   THE 
 
 versal,  that  it  is  scarce  probable  there  is  a 
 Scotch  family  on  the  continent,  which  is  not  de- 
 scended from  some  covenanter  *. 
 
 S.  These  covenants  were  public  deeds  of  the 
 representatives  of  both  church  and  state,  acqui- 
 esced in  by  tlie  subjects,  and  so  as  hindinrr  as 
 the  covenant  of  Israel  with  the  Gibeonites,  which 
 was  only  sworn  by  the  Princes  of  the  congrega- 
 tion, Josh.  ix.  and  yet  continued  binding  on  the 
 whole  nation  four  hundred  years  afterward, 
 2  Sam.  xxi. 
 
 4.  These  covenants  were  public  deeds  of  the 
 body  of  the  adult  members  in  both  church  and 
 state,  and  often  repeated  and  ratified  by  the  su- 
 preme authority  of  both,  and  so  binding  upon  the 
 whole  church  and  nation,  and  their  posterity  af- 
 ter them,  Deut.  v.  2,  S.  and  xxix.  1 — 13  f. 
 Even  the  public  curse  imprecated  by  the  Jews, 
 met  at  the  passover,  iMath.  xxvii.  25.  hath  af- 
 fected their  whole  nation  and  their  posterity. 
 Without  supposing  that  public  covenants  of  pa- 
 rents, and  of  representatives  of  church  or  state, 
 or  of  the  greater  part  of  a  society,  were  bind- 
 ing on  their  descendants,  the  body  represented 
 the  whole  society,  and  such  as  accede  thereto, 
 there  could  be  no  dependence  on  public  covenants 
 
 •  See  Rapin,  vol.  ii.  fol.  303.  Hume's  Hist,  on  ann.  1638,  p.  vi.  257. 
 Neal's  Hist.  Puritans,  vol.  ii.  p.  m,  2,5{>  iJGO  2(il.  Dickson,  Henderson, 
 and  Cant's  Answers  to,  and  Kcplies  of.  Doctors  of  Aberdeen,  p  4",  40,  44-  77. 
 97.  Spang's  Historia  Motiiuni,  p  (iO.  Brown's  ApoIogeticalJlclation,  p.  48. 
 Hind  let  Loose,  p.  77.  514 — 520.  Livin<iston"s  Life,  p.  'J2.  JJishop 
 Ciuthrie'sMeiwoirs,  p.  35.  Stevenson's  Hist,  vol.  ii.  p  291 — 297,311,  445. 
 Willison's  Testim.  p.  7.  Wilson's  Defence,  p.  210 — 243.  Cniickshank's 
 Hist.  vol.  i.  p.  'S\^. 
 
 -f  For  proof  of  the  perpetual  obligation  of  these  covenants,  see  Timor- 
 ais's  (  ovcnanters'  Plea,  Croft's  Fastening  of  Peter's  fetters,  Hind  let  I  a>osc, 
 p.  514 — 520.  Urown's  Apologctiral  Kelation,  p.  327  to  4-li.  See  also 
 Brown's  Letter  on  the  perpetual  oblii^ation  of  the  Scotch  Covenants,  Walker's 
 Sermons,  both  hitely  published. 
 
RISE   AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.         15 
 
 and  treaties  in,  or  between  societies.  Whenever 
 the  immediate  covenanters,  or  often  a  i'vw  of 
 them,  died  or  lost  their  power,  the  ohlit;-  ition  of 
 the  treaties  would  be  voided,  and  so  all  thiiiL^s 
 kept  in  confusion. 
 
 Twelve  years  of  reformation  were  scarce  elaps- 
 ed, when  all  the  above  advances  therein  bei^an  to 
 be  plucked  up  by  the  roots.  To  support  King 
 Charles  II.  ag^ainst  Cromwell,  but  contrary  to 
 solemn  enslavements,  m  icked  malignants  were 
 received  into  places  of  power  and  trust.  By  this, 
 both  church  and  state  were  thrown  into  fearful 
 disoiders.  Those  of  the  general  assembly,  who 
 countenanced  this  promiscuous  admission,  were 
 called  Resohitionei'S :  these  who  warmly  opposed 
 it,  were  designed  the  Protester.  The  nation 
 was  overspread,  and  torn  asunder  by  the  warm- 
 est animosity,  and  the  mutual  censures  betwixt 
 them.  Cromwell  having  routed  their  King,  and 
 forced  him  to  flee  the  country,  restricted  both 
 parties. 
 
 When  Charles  II.  was  restored  to  his  kingdom, 
 anno  1660,  he,  and  most  of  his  subjects,  profane- 
 ly trampled  on  their  solemn  vows.  Zealously, 
 and  at  no  small  expense,  had  the  covenanters 
 supported  his  interest,  and  promoted  his  restora- 
 tion:  Destruction  and  ruin  were  their  only  re- 
 ward. Their  covenanted  reformation,  Irom  J6iJ7 
 to  16^0,  was  declared  null  and  void;  and  much 
 of  it  rebellious  and  treasonable.  Their  cove- 
 nants were  declared  unlawful,  and  not  binding 
 on  the  swearers  ;  many  of  tlu'  subjects  were 
 obliged  solemnly  to  renounce  them  as  such  ;  by 
 order  of  authority  they  were  publicly  burnt;  and 
 it  was  declared  treasonable  t(»  give  or  take  tliem. 
 JEpiscopacy  was  restored   and  advanced.      The 
 
16  AN  HISTORICAL   ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 Kin^  was  declared  supreme  head  of  the  church 
 in  all  causes,  to  whom  the  orderini:^  of  her  whole 
 external  govcrjmient  did  solely  heioii;^,  as  an  in- 
 herent rijj^ht  of  his  crown.  By  oaths,  declara- 
 tions, or  tests,  the  subjects  were  reijuircd  to  jus- 
 tify these  odious  crimes.  Such  as  (aithfully  op- 
 posed, were  fined,  imprisoned,  tortured,  banish- 
 ed, or  murdered,  under,  and  without  colour  of 
 law.  At  the  very  beginning",  about  two-thirds 
 of  the  ministry  complied  with  the  court.  Not  a 
 few  others,  too  cowardly,  deserted  their  judica- 
 tures and  flocks :  many  accepted  of  an  indul- 
 gence to  preach,  flowinj^  from  Charles's  supre- 
 macy, and  hampered  with  sinful  restrictions,  as, 
 that  they  should  not  meddle  with  the  Sove- 
 reign's spiritual  headship ;  should  not  marry,  or 
 admit  to  the  seals  of  the  covenant,  any  who  re- 
 sided in  the  congregations  of  curates,  unless  at- 
 tested by  them ;  should  either  attend  the  Pre- 
 latic  courts,  or  confine  themselves  to  their  own 
 parish,  &:c.  They  afterward  thanked  the  Duke 
 of  York  for  his  toleration,  clearly  founded  on 
 his  claim  to  absolute  power,  and  calculated  to 
 introduce  the  whole  delusion,  idolatry,  and  ty- 
 ranny of  Antichrist. 
 
 In  1688,  when  James  and  his  agents  were  just 
 going  to  wreath  the  yoke  of  Popery  and  slavery 
 about  our  necks,  God  ejected  him  from  his  throne, 
 and  crushed  his  designs.  The  parliament  which 
 met  thereafter,  abolished  prelacy,  the  King's  su- 
 premacy in  ecclesiastical  affairs,  the  Yule  va- 
 cance,  together  with  the  persecuting  acts  of  the 
 preceding  period.  Its  wicked  oaths  and  declara- 
 tions, they  discharged;  and,  in  room  thereof,  ap- 
 point(Hl  a  simple  oath  of  allegiance,  and  a  solemn 
 declaration  of  lidelity  to  our  Sovereign  King  Wil- 
 
 r> 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.      17 
 
 liam.  They  revived  and  confirmed  all  fornier  laws, 
 in  so faras against  Popery,  and  lurthe  maintenance 
 of  the  true  reformed  Piotestantrelif^ion.  They  rati- 
 fied the  Westminster  Confession  of  Faitli,  and  en- 
 grossed it  into  their  act.  'J'hey  ratified  and  conlirin- 
 edPresbyterianchurchgovernment  and  discipline, 
 as  agreeable  to  the  word  of  God,  and  most  conducive 
 to  the  advancement  of  true  pletjj  and  i^odlin  ss,  and 
 the  establishing  of  peace  and  tranqniUiiij  within  this 
 realm.  They  revived  tiie  1 14th  act  of  the  par- 
 liament 1692,  in  so  far  as  it  estahlished  the  same; 
 and  rescinded  all  acts  and  laws  in  so  far  as  con- 
 trary to  said  Protestant  reliiifion,  and  Presbyte- 
 rian g-overnment  and  discipline.  The  govern- 
 ment of  the  church  they  lod«;ed  in  the  iiands  of 
 such  ministers  as  had  been  ejected  for  oj)j)osin;^ 
 Prelacy.  They  abolished  patrona<^e  ;  but  lodg- 
 ed the  election  of  ministers  in  the  hand  of  heri- 
 tors and  elders,  with  the  consent  of  the  con/;re- 
 o^ation.  They  made  a  variety  of  excellent  acts 
 against  profaneness  and  blasj)hcmy.  (Jueen 
 Anne's  first  parliament  lurther  ratified  the  true 
 Protestant  religion,  together  \\lth  thenorsliip, 
 discipline,  and  government  of  this  church  ;  and 
 declared  the  unalterable  continuance  thereof  an 
 essential  ixwil  fundamental  condition  of  the  union, 
 in  all  time  coming. 
 
 In  1090,  the  General  Assembly  s|)ent  the  first 
 day  of  their  meeting  in  solemn  lasting,  and  la- 
 menting over  the  sins  of  the  land.  Tlie  former 
 assemblies  concerned  in  the  above-mentioned 
 public  resolutions,  were  given  uj)  to  o!)livion. 
 Whatever  censures  the  resolutioners  or  jirotestcrs 
 had  passed  upon  one  another,  were  declared  null 
 and  voitl.  In  the  act  for  a  national  last,  a  mul- 
 titude of  the  abominations  of  thi-  ru  rsiHiilin:;  pi!- 
 
18  AN   HISTOIUCAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 riod  Were  condemned  and  lamented.  The  par- 
 liamenTs  settlenit  nt  of  religion  was  acquiesced 
 in  without  any  c()iiij)laint.  In  the  acts  of  this, 
 and  other  subsequent  assemblies,  we  find  a  va- 
 riety of  occasional  hints,  inq)lyinc^  an  acknow- 
 ledgment of  the  authority  of  the  <^a^neral  assem- 
 blies from  1638  to  10.30  '  Till  after  1710,  espe- 
 cially in  acts  for  fastini;,  we  find  Irequent  hints 
 of  the  binding"  obligation  of  our  covenants.  In 
 the  Commission's  Seasonable  Admonition,  ratified 
 by  the  assembly  1699,  and  in  some  acts  of  fol- 
 lowing assemblies*,  we  have  as  full  an  assertion 
 of  Christ's  sole  headship  over  his  church  ;  of  her 
 intrinsic  power;  and  of  the  divine  right  of  Pres- 
 byterian government,  as  can  be  met  with  in  the 
 records  of  this  church.  In  1706  the  Commis- 
 sion remonstrated  against  subjecting  the  nation, 
 in  any  degree,  to  the  authority  of  the  English 
 Bishops,  as  spiritual  lords  in  the  British  parlia- 
 ment ;  and  against  making  the  confirmation  of 
 Prelacy  in  England  an  essential  condition  of  the 
 union.  In  1711,  the  Commission,  and  in  171^, 
 the  Assembly,  warmly  remonstrated  against  the 
 British  parliament,  their  granting  a  toleration 
 to  all  sects,  except  Papists  and  blasphemers;  and 
 against  their  restoring  of  patronage. 
 
 King  William  and  his  managers  were  far  enough 
 from  being  hearty  IViends  to  a  covenanted  refor- 
 mation, or  willing  to  allow  of  the  ejection  of  loy- 
 al Episcopalian  clergy,  whose  lives  were  tolera- 
 ble. For  fear  of  provoking  him  and  his  agents 
 to  oppose  or  subv'  rt  the  cstabli>hment  ol'  Pres- 
 byterian government  and  discipline,  the  princi- 
 pal promoters  of  the  revolution  minced  matters, 
 
 *  Adnion.  p.  5.      Ass.  1703.  act  7.  IG.        Ass,  17U7.  act  11,      Ass. 
 171 1,  act  10. 
 
RISE   AND   PROGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION'.        19 
 
 as  far  as  their  consciences  would  permit.     Hence 
 a  number  of  well-disposetl  persons  in  the  revohi- 
 tion  church,  thoui^ht  the  procedure  of  both  par- 
 liament and  assembly  defective.    Considering  the 
 horrid  wickedness  of  the  persecuting  ptMiod,  they 
 were  displeased  that  the  threefold  representation 
 of  grievances,  especially  that  by  Mr.  Shields  and 
 his  brethren,   presented  to  the  assembly    lf;i)0, 
 was  refused  to  be  read  or  considered  ;  that  the 
 wicked  oaths,  acts,  indulgencies,  and  persecution, 
 and  other  evils  of  that  period,  were  not  more  ful- 
 ly and  plainly  condemned,  and  the  testimonies  of 
 the    martyrs    against    them    clearly    approven. 
 Considering  the  indignity  done  to  the  work  of 
 reformation  between  1G:58  and  16'5(),  they  were 
 persuaded  it   ought  not  to   have  been  so  much 
 overlooked,  or  left  under  any  slur,  but  solemnly 
 and  plainly  approven.     Considering  what  daring 
 indignity  had   of   late  been  done  thereto,  they 
 thought   the   sole   headship    of  Christ  over  his 
 church,  together  with   her   intrinsic  po^^  er,  and 
 the  divine  right  of  Presbytery,  should  have  been 
 more  clearly,  and  still  more  solemnly,  asserted, 
 in  acts  made  for  that  very  purpose.     They  were 
 grieved  that  our  covenants  were  not  more  so- 
 lemnly and  particularly  approven,  and  their  ob- 
 ligation upon   posterity  more   fully  asserted  and 
 evinced  ;  and  that  no  steps  were  taken  towards 
 the  renovation  thereof.    I'hey  were  offended  that 
 noted  persecutors  possessed  civil  places  ui'  power 
 and  trust,  and  were  so  easily  admitted  to  sealing 
 or(lin;inces,  and  even  to  tlu^  office  of  elders  in  the 
 church: — offended  that  the  Hishops'  early  flight 
 to  England,  and  the  favour  of  some  great  men, 
 screened   them    from    chureh-censure ;    and   tliat 
 jnany  curates  were  admitted   by  the  chuich  into 
 
20  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 iTiinisterial  fellowship,  without  any  express  re- 
 nunciation ofahjured  Prelacy,  or  profession  of  sor- 
 row for  their  compliance  with  it.  They  were  of- 
 fended that  the  meetin^Ts  of  the  General  Assem- 
 bly were  so  tamely  dissolved,  or  prorof:^ued,  at 
 the  will  of  Kin^  William,  or  Queen  Anne. 
 
 It  is  easy  to  see  that  such  persons  would  hearti- 
 ly detest  the  parliament's  consentini^  to  the  con- 
 firmation of  Prelacy  in  England,  as  an  essential 
 condition  of  the  union  ;  and  reckon  it  contrary 
 to  Scripture,  and  a  plain  burial  of  the  solemn 
 leai,aie,  wherein  we  are  engaged  to  endeavour  the 
 reformation  of  England  from  Prelacy : — would 
 be  grieved  with  the  introduction  from  England, 
 of  the  abjuration-oath,  as  a  qualification  for  ci- 
 vil offices  ;  of  custom-house-oaths  ;  of  unnecessa- 
 ry repetition  of  oaths  ;  of  superstitious  swear- 
 ing by  touching  and  kissing  the  Gospel-  ;  and 
 of  Scotsmen's  receiving  the  Lord's  Supper  in 
 the  English  manner,  as  a  qualification  for  civil 
 offices,  while  serving  the  Sovereign  in  EnL>land  ; 
 and  with  the  parliament's  restoration  of  patro- 
 nag(%  and  the  superstitious  Yule  vacance  of  our 
 civil  courts  ;  and  with  their  granting  an  almost 
 unlimited  toh'ration.  But  it  was  the  imposition  of 
 the  abjuration  oath,  especially  upon  the  minis- 
 try, which  then  occasioned  the  most  mournful 
 often ce  and  division  in  the  church.  Every  true 
 Presbyterian  heartily  abhorred  Popery,  and  de- 
 tested the  Pretender  for  its  sake  :  but  knowing 
 that  God  had  expressly  prohibited  the  taking  of 
 his  name  in  vain,  and  that  he  will  not  hold  him 
 guiltless  that  taketh  his  name  in  vain,  Exod. 
 XX.  7.-— that  forwardness  in  swearing  oaths  is 
 marked  as  part  of  a  wieked  man's  character, 
 Eccl.  ix.  2.  and  great  caution  therein  as  part  of 
 
RISE   AND   rROGilESS  OF   THE   SECESSION.        21 
 
 the  character  of  a  saint,  Gen.  xxiv.  2 — D.  Know- 
 ing that  every  oath  oui>lit  to  be  fur  confirniation, 
 to  make  an  end  of  strife,  Ilcb  vi.  j  (j.  and  so 
 ought,  as  far  as  the  terms  can  admit,  to  ht*  ta- 
 ken in  the  sense  of  the  imposer; — that  it  oui;lit 
 to  be  sworn  in  trulh,  and  in  judirmcut,  an*!  in 
 righ/cousficsSy  Jer.  iv.  2.  and  with  a  single  eye  to 
 the  glory  of  God,  1  Cor.  x.  SI.  Knowing  that 
 Ave  in  this  land  can  take  no  oath  contrary  to  our 
 public  covenants,  the  national  and  solemn  league, 
 wherein  we  abjure  Popery,  Frelac)',  superstitious 
 ceremonies,  Lrastianism,  schism,  kc.  witliout  in- 
 volving ourselves  in  the  most  fearful  perjury  ; — 
 many  truly  loyal,  judicious,  and  godly  ministers 
 and  Christians  scrupled  at  taking  it,  or  even  at 
 joining  in  church-fellowship  with  these  mini- 
 sters whf)  took  it.     Besides  other  objections. 
 
 1.  They  thought  that  oath  unnkckssaiiy,  and 
 so  a  taking  of  the  name  of  the  Lord  their  God 
 IN  VAIN  ; — as  every  thing  lawful  therein  contain- 
 ed, is  just  the  moment  before  sworn  in  the  alll- 
 GiANCfe,  and  solemnly  engaged  to  in  the  assur- 
 ance. It  moreover  appeared  to  them,  that  this 
 oath  was  of  no  use  to  exclude  treacher^ius  Jaco- 
 bites from  places  of  power  or  trust,  or  to  secure 
 the  Protestant  succession  in  the  family  of  Hano- 
 ver.— The  imposition  of  it  both  in  I  702  and  1711 
 being  chiefly  owing  to  Jacobitical  influence;  and 
 none  make  less  scruple  to  take  it  than  most  of 
 the  Jacobites. 
 
 2.  Notwithstanding  the  jurants  being  obliged 
 to  [)rofess,  upon  oath,  that  every  word  in  it  has 
 a  ])/ain  and  common  sc?isCy  in  which  they  swear 
 they  take  it,  wi/hout  arij/  secret  fiSenut/ion  what- 
 soevcr,  they  found  in  it  several  expressions  which 
 they  deemed  unsafe  ;    as  to  swear  the  sovereign 
 
22  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 to  be  LAWFUL  and  rightful  king  of  all  the  do* 
 minions  and  countiiL's  helon^-ing  to  Great  Bri- 
 tain ;  as  they  hardly  knew  what  countries  Bri- 
 tain claimed  ;  or  the  lawfalness  of  her  claim  to 
 some  of  them  ;  nay,  suspected  her  claim  to  some 
 of  them  to  he  merely  founded  on  treachery  and 
 violence : — to  swear  they  would  to  the  utmost 
 of  their  power  defend  the  sovereign  against  all 
 attempts  which  should  be  made  against  his  dig- 
 nity, which  thf»y  were  certain,  in  the  original 
 form  of  the  oath,  included  his  spiritual  headship 
 over  the  church,  as  well  as  his  civil  supremacy  ; 
 and  in  most  part  of  his  dominions  certainly  re- 
 tains the  same  signification  ;  nor  hath  it  ever 
 been  declared,  that  it  hath  not  that  signification 
 when  the  oath  is  sworn  in  Scotland  : — and  to 
 swear  they  would  do  their  best  endeavours  to 
 disclose  all  treasons,  i.  e.  whatever  was  declar- 
 ed treason  by  the  Scotch,  English,  and  British 
 laws  ;  when  they  had  scarce  access  to  examine 
 all  these  laws,  and  were  scarce  satisfied  that  every 
 thing  they  declared  treasonable  was  really  so. 
 
 3.  As  the  parliament  of  England,  in  their  ori- 
 ginal imposition  of  this  oath,  had  expressly  de- 
 clared, that  one  end  thereof  was  the  perpetual 
 maintenance  of  the  church  of  En<rlancL  as  by  laiv 
 estahlishedy  i.  c.  as  corrupted  with  Popish  Prela- 
 cy and  ceremonies. — And  in  this  oath  thejurant 
 swears,  that  he  will  to  tlic  utermost  of  his  power 
 maintain  the  limitation  and  succession  of  the 
 British  crown  as  it  is,  or  which  stands  limited 
 by  an  English  act,  which  expressly  requires  tlie 
 Sovereign  to  be  ojthe  communion  of  the  chvrch  of 
 Euf^land,  and  to  swear  to  nia'intain  her  as  by  law 
 established ; — they  thought  the  oath  engaged 
 tjiem  indirectly  to  support  Prelacy  and  the  cere- 
 
RISE   AND   PROGRESS  OF   THE   SECESSION.       23 
 
 monies  in  Ens^land,  and  to  endeavour  to  shut  up 
 the  Kin^  to  swear  a  sinful  oath,  and  ])ractise  un- 
 lawful church-feUowship  as  a  condition  of  enjoy- 
 ing his  royal  powers  and  privilei^^es. — This  tliey 
 looked  upon  as  contrary  to  Scripture,  1  Tiiess. 
 V.  22.  Eph.  V.  11.  Col.  ii.  20,21.  Luke  xxii. 
 24! — 27.  and  expressly  contrary  to  our  covenants, 
 whereby  Prelacy  and  ceremonies,  whether  in 
 Scotland  or  England,  are  abjured  as  sinful,  i\nd 
 to  be  extirpated.  Many  even  thought  that  a 
 swearing  to  maintain  the  succession  of  the  crown 
 against  all  others,  to  fhe  heirs  <>/'  the  bodif  of  So- 
 phidy  upon  the  simple  condition  of  their  bcimr 
 Protestants,  was  unlawful,  as  being  contrary  to 
 some  fundamental  laws  of  the  kingdom  ;  and  as 
 it  might,  in  a  variety  of  suj)posable  cases,  in- 
 volve the  adherent  to  this  oath,  in  unreason- 
 able conduct. 
 
 4.  When  they  judged  the  swearing  of  this 
 oath  an  unnecessary  taking  of  God's  name  in 
 vain  ;  when  they  looked  on  the  above  and  other 
 expressions  of  it  as  obscure  or  unsafe;  w  hen  they 
 looked  on  it,  as  including  an  engagement  to  the 
 indirect  and  mediate  maintenance  of  Prelacy, 
 and  the  ceremonies  in  England  ;  and  when  they 
 moreover  knew,  that,  contrary  to  manifold  laws 
 of  God,  Lev.  xix.  14.  Deut.  xxvii.  18.  Kom.  xiv. 
 13 — 22.andxv.  I — S.  1  Cor.x.2.S.31 — 3^.  andviii. 
 9 — 1^^.  Rom  xvi.  17,  IS.  Malth.  xviii.  6,  7.  they 
 would,  in  taking  it,  lay  stumbling-blocks  in  the 
 way  of  others;  encourage  or  harden  some  in  tak- 
 ing it  rashly  and  ignorant ly  in  the  too  common 
 manner;  or,  in  taking  it  frejpitnily,  perhajis  se- 
 veral  times  in  one  day  or  week,  to  qualify  them 
 fordifiVrent  ofliccs  in  the  slate;  or  give  occa>ion 
 to  contention,  schism,  evil-speaking,  and  mutual 
 
24>  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 revilinE^,  in  the  societies  wherewith  they  were 
 connected — they  could  not  allow  themselves,  for 
 fear  of  any  human  penalty,  to  take  it  heartily 
 and  WILLINGLY,  as  every  jurant  has  to  swear  he 
 doth. — 'I'o  these  reasons,  a  variety  of  answers 
 were  })ublished  ;  hut  destitute  of  that  candour 
 or  clearness  necessary  to  satisfy  a  duly  tender 
 and  well-informed  conscience,  in  the  awful  and 
 solemn  point  of  an  oath. 
 
 AVhile  the  affair  of  the  abjuration-oath  conti- 
 nued rending  the  church,  I\Ir.  John  Simson,  pro- 
 fessor of  divinity  at  Glasgow,  in  his  defences  to 
 the  assembly,  against  Mr.  James  Webster,  main- 
 tained, that  Heathens  have  an  implicit  discovery 
 of  redemption  through  Christ :  that  if  they,  or 
 others,  with  such  moral  seriousness,  as  they  are 
 by  nature  capable  of,  use  the  means  of  liappi- 
 ness  they  have,  they  shall  certainly  obtain  sav- 
 ing grace  and  endless  felicity  :  that  all  infants 
 have  their  souls  formed  as  pure  and  holy  as 
 Adam's  was,  and  dying  in  nonage,  shall  |)robably 
 be  saved  :  that  no  proper  covenant  of  works  was 
 made  with  Adam,  as  the  representative  of  his 
 posterity  :  that  our  own  happiness  ought  to  be 
 our  chiet  end  in  the  service  of  God:  that  there  is 
 no  immediate  precourse  of  God  attending,  and 
 influencing  ihe  acts  of  his  reasonable  creatures : 
 and  that  there  will  be  no  sinning  in  hell  after  the 
 last  judgment. — After  tedious  altrrcations,  at 
 various  meetings,  the  assembly  1717  found  these 
 positions  no  more  but  opinions  not  ncccssarij  to  be 
 taught  in  divinifi/  ;  opinions  ?wt  cvklc?it/j/  Jowuhd 
 in  Scripture,  and  some  oj  t/icni  tending  to  alirihuic 
 too  much  to  the  power  of  corrupt  nature:  and  they 
 discharged  him,  or  any  other  under  their  inspec- 
 tion, to  propagate  them. 
 
 I 
 
RISE   AND   TROriRKSS  OF  THE    SECESSION.         25 
 
 That  verv  day,  however,  they  rondcmned,  as 
 most  inisouiid  and  detestable^  this  proposition. 
 That  it  is  unsound  to  teach.  We  must  forsake  our 
 sin  in  order  to  come  to  Christ,  and  to  insUttini^  us  in 
 covenant  with  God.  This  was  thought  a  plain 
 affirming,  that  we  ought  to  forsake  our  sin, 
 saving  ourselves  from  the  h)ve,  power,  and  prac- 
 tice thereof,  before  we  come  to  Christ,  as  the 
 only  Saviour;  or  have  any  interest  in  his  new- 
 covenant  blessings.  To  give  a  check  to  this,  and 
 other  legal  errors,  then  too  ranij)ant,  a  noted  Eng- 
 lish treatise,  entitled,  The  Jf arrow  of  Modern 
 Divinity,  was  republished,  with  a  recommenda- 
 tory preface  by  Mr.  .Tames  Hog,  one  of  tlie  ho- 
 liest ministers  in  the  kingdom.  For  about  eighty 
 years  this  treatise  had  maintained  a  considera- 
 I)le  character  with  the  serious  :  now,  the  Assem- 
 bly 1720,  many  of  whose  members,  it  was  shrewd- 
 ly suspected,  had  never  much,  if  at  all,  perused 
 it,  condemned  a  great  number  of  passages  there- 
 in, and  charged  ministers  to  warn  their  people 
 against  reading  it.  In  this  hasty  attack,  they 
 too  plainly  condemned  the  ofl'ering  of  Christ  as 
 a  Saviour  to  ^//  men,  or  to  \\\qv[  as  sinners ;  and 
 the  maintaininir,  that  believers  are  fully  deliver- 
 ed  from  the  commanding  and  condemnmg  power 
 of  the  law  as  a  covenant  of  works.  'J'hey  too 
 plainly  asserted  our  holiness  to  be  a  federal,  or 
 conditional  means  of  our  obtaining  everlasting 
 happiness ;  and  that  slavish  fear  of  endless  mi- 
 sery, and  legal  hope  of  future  blessedness,  ought 
 to  influence  the  saints  in  their  study  of  gospel- 
 holiness. — These  almost  entirely  scriptural  ex- 
 pressions, that  believers  arc  not  under  the  law, 
 and  do  not  counnit  sin  ;  that  the  Lord  sees  no  sin 
 in  them,  and  cannot  be  an^n/  uith  (hem  ;  they  dc- 
 
26  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 dared  Antinomian  paradoxes.  The  distinction 
 of  the  moral  law  into  the  forms  of  a  covenant, 
 and  of  a  rule  of  duty  in  the  hand  of  Christ,  used 
 in  order  to  explain  these  expresions,  they  utterly 
 condemned.  Messrs.  Thomas  Boston,  Ebenezer 
 anil  Ralph  Erskines,  with  nine  others,  remon- 
 strated against  this  decision  ;  and  in  tlieir  an- 
 swers to  the  Commission's  twelve  queries,  with 
 no  >iinall  evidence  elucidated  the  truth.  The  As- 
 sembly i7'^2  resumed  the  affair,  rebuked  the 
 twelve  representers  for  some  ex[)ressions  in  their 
 representation,  and  made  an  act  explaining  and 
 confirmini^^  the  act  of  1 720  relative  thereto.  This, 
 thouijh  not  so  gross  as  the  former,  the  represent- 
 ing L-rethren  protested  against,  as  injurious  to 
 truth  I  but  the  Assembly  refused  to  mark  their 
 protest.  Not  a  few  ministers,  in  order  to  avoid 
 the  most  rlistant  appearance  of  favouring  the 
 Marhow,  seeminii  to  become  more  legal  in  their 
 doctirne  than  (brmerly,  great  numbers  of  serious 
 Christians  crowded  after  the  representers  and 
 their  friends.  These,  notu  ithstanding  of  their 
 distinguished  holiness  of  practice,  and  zealous 
 recommending  of  it  to  their  hearers,  were  ex- 
 ceedingly tiaduced.  as  n(^w  schemers,  and  Anti- 
 noi'.ian  encouragers  of  a  lircMitious  life 
 
 Probably  their  reproach  and  trouble  had  been 
 more  extensive,  had  not  a  flagiant  report  spread 
 al»road,  tliat  INIr.  John  Simson  not  only  con- 
 temned thf  Assend)ly*s  prohiijition,  and  \aught 
 bis  fore  mentioned  errors;  hul  had  taught,  that 
 Jesus  Christ  is  not  necessarily  existent:  that  the 
 persons  in  the  Godhead  an  not  the  very  same  in 
 substance:  that  ncicssa/j/  (wisfcnct',  .suprtinc  Dciii/, 
 and  bcMig  the  o/////  true  C-</,  m;!y  be  takm  in  a 
 sense  importing  the  personal  propeit)  ot  the  i'a- 
 
tlier,  and  <?o  nnt  !)cloni4iive'  t<)  the  Son  and  (foly 
 Ghost.- — The  toachin<4'  of  these  Aiian  tenets  was 
 sufiieientlN  ()ro\'ed  a<;ainst  him.  But  to  tfie  As- 
 seinMy  he  presented  deehuarions  in  orthodcix 
 lani;ua^e  ;  and  after  mueli  quibbling,  prott  .>s*  d 
 his  sorrow  for  some  o(  the  oftrnsive  expressions 
 that  were  proved  against  him.  When  the  pro- 
 cess had  eontinued  more  than  two  years,  the  As- 
 sembly .72s  suspended  him  fV()m  t*i'.'  exer<  ise  of 
 all  eeelesiastieal  funetion,  till  another  assenibly 
 should  think  fit  to  take  off  the  sentence,  'i'he 
 Assembly  ;  729  furtl^r  deelared,  that  it  was  not 
 proper  to  entrust  him  any  more  with  the  train- 
 inii^  up  of  youn^  men  for  the  holy  ininistry  I'he 
 libel  relative  to  his  continuir)(^  to  teaeh  his  tbr- 
 nier  errors,  was  fully  jiroved,  but  left  undis- 
 cussed. Many  were  offLuded,  that  his  b!aspi)e- 
 my  and  error  were  so  slightly  censured. 
 
 Not  lont,^  ."fter,  IMr.  Campbell,  Professor  of 
 church  history  in  the  university  of  St.  Andrew's, 
 in  his.  printed  tracts,  ridiculed  close  walkini,^  with 
 God,  and  consulting  him  m  all  i»ur  ways,  as  tn- 
 ihusiasm.  He  averred,  that,  in  the  int(  rval  be- 
 tween Christ's  death  and  resurrection,  his  disci- 
 ples looked  upon  him  as  a  downrii;ht  impostor, 
 lie  maintained  that  self  love  is  the  rhiel  motive, 
 and  standard  of  all  actions,  relit;rous  or  virtu- 
 ous. He  asserted,  that  the  existence  of  (iod,  and 
 the  immortality  of  the  soul,  cannot  be  knjfun  by 
 the  Iii;ht  of  nature:  and  that  the  laws  of  naiure 
 are  a  certain  and  sufficient  rule  to  direct  ration- 
 al minds  to  happiness;  and  our  observation  ilure- 
 of  the  great  means  of  our  real  and  lasiinn  t(  li- 
 city. — Tiiese  he  so  varnished  ovrr,  in  Ins  de- 
 fences, that  he  never  was  censured  on  a  count 
 of  them.     Tiiis  added  to  the  lurnier  ulfence. 
 
28  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 The  mal-administration  of  church-government 
 ■was  now  become  notorious  and  glaring.  For 
 ahout  thirteen  years  after  Queen  Anne  liad  re- 
 stored j)atr()nage,  none  accepted  the  presenta- 
 tion unless  he  had  tlie  call  or  consent  of  the 
 Christian  people.  The  British  parliament  in 
 171  9  ex])ressly  declared,  that  unless  the  candi- 
 date accepted,  the  presentation  was  null.  How 
 easily  then  might  the  church  have  restrained 
 her  candidates  trom  accepting !  But  it  was,  and 
 is  more  and  more  otherwise.  During  Mr.  Sim- 
 son's  last  process,  the  violent  intrusion  of  pre- 
 sentees u])on  reclaiming^ungregations  began. 
 To  cut  otr  standing  testimonies  against  their 
 own  sinful  conduct,  the  Assembly  1730,  by  an 
 express  act,  discharged  marking  the  reasons  of 
 any  protest  or  dissent  in  their  minutes.  Nay, 
 in  this  and  some  subsequent  Assemblies,  it  be- 
 came fashionable  to  refuse  to  record  the  dissents 
 or  protests  themselves.  Against  this,  and  other 
 growing  defections,  about  forty  ministers,  and 
 sixteen  hundred  people,  presented  a  warm  re- 
 monstrance to  the  Assembly  1732,  and  begged  a 
 judicial  assertion  of  truth,  in  opposition  to  jMr. 
 Simson's  errors.  These  representations  the  As- 
 sembly refused  to  hear:  and,  contrary  to  instruc- 
 tion from  the  far  greater  part  of  presbyteries 
 which  sent  any,  they  enacted,  that  Protestant 
 heiitors,  whether  prelatic  Jacobites  or  not,  and 
 elders,  should  be  the  sole  electors  of  gospel  mi- 
 nisters. This  act  was  reckoned  an  overturning 
 of  Christ's  spiritual  kingiium,  in  his  own  name  ; 
 and  u  robbing  his  people  of  their  spiritual  privi- 
 lege, undei  pretence  of  his  authority.  Next  As- 
 sembly, under  pain  of  the  highest  censure,  pro- 
 liibited  the  Presbytery  ot   Duuiferlinc,  and  by 
 
RISE  AND   PROGRESS  OF   THE   SECESSION.      29 
 
 consequence  every  other,  to  allow  sealiii«;  ordi- 
 nances to  such  whose  conscience  could  not  sub- 
 mit to  the  ininistrv  of  a  presentee,  violently  ob- 
 truded upon  them.  According  to  this,  many  be- 
 hoved either  to  trample  on  their  conscience,  and 
 the  Christian  law,  or  to  be  held  as  Heathen  men 
 and  publicans. 
 
 Meanwhile  Mr.  Ebenezer  Erskine,  in  a  sermon 
 before  the  Synod  at  Perth,  October  1732,  de- 
 cried patronage,  and  the  Assembly's  above-men- 
 tioned act,  relative  to  the  election  of  ministers, 
 and  some  other  prevalent  courses  of  defection. 
 After  three  days  of  warm  disputation,  the  sy- 
 nod ordered  him  to  be  rebuked  at  their  bar,  for 
 the  matter  and  manner  of  his  sermon.  Twelve 
 ministers  and  two  elders  dissented.  Himself  ap- 
 pealed to  the  ensuing  general  Asscmijly.  But, 
 instead  of  redress,  that  sui)reme  jutlicature  ap- 
 pointed him  to  receive  a  rebuke  at  their  bar. 
 Conceiving  the  truths  of  (Jod  affirmed  in  his  ser- 
 mon were  hereby  injured,  he  protested,  that 
 without  violating  his  conscience  he  could  not 
 submit ;  and  that  he  should  be  at  liberty  to  give 
 a  like  testimony  on  every  i)roper  occasion.  For 
 their  own  exoneration,  Messrs.  William  Wilson. 
 Alexander  Moncrief,  and  James  Fisher,  adhered 
 to  his  protest.  Without  allowing  these  four  bre- 
 thren to  attempt  a  defence  of  their  conduct,  the 
 Assembly  appointed  their  Commission  to  proceed 
 againt  them,  in  August  next,  by  suspension,  or 
 higher  censure,  if  they  did  not  retract  their  pro- 
 test, and  profess  their  sorrow  lor  taking  it.  In 
 August,  being  hanlly  permitted  to  declare  their 
 mind,  and  still  adheiing  to  their  protest,  they 
 were  su>peiu!eil  from  tlie  exereisi'  ol  their  office. 
 In  November,  tiie  Conmiissiun  still  finding  them 
 
.■^0  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 impeniteut,  did,  hy  tlieir  moderator's  casting 
 vote,  loose  tli'ir  tninistcrial  relation  to  their  re- 
 spective coni;i<  .^'ations.  These  four  brethren 
 protested,  that  their  oifi^^e,  and  their  relation  to 
 their  conjure,  ations,  should  be  held  as  valid  as 
 if  no  sui'h  sentence;  had  been  passed;  and  they 
 declared  a  Sl^CKS^I^JN,  not  from  the  constitution  oi. 
 the  church  of  Scotland,  but  from  the  prevai/'uig 
 purffj  in  hrr  Judicatures. 
 
 'jiiat  they  mi^ht  regularly  adhere  to  their 
 principles,  and  afFr»rd  relief  to  such  as  were  op- 
 pressed with  lnlru^i(Jn^,  they  quickly  after,  with 
 prayer  and  fasting,  constituted  themselves  into 
 an  ecclesiastic  court,  which  they  termed,  the  As- 
 sociate Preshvtcry.  Their  minutes  hear,  that 
 Messrs.  Wi}s(>n  and  Moncrief,  soon  after,  framed 
 their  first  testimr)ny  to  the  doctrine,  worship, 
 disciplifie,  and  yovernment  of  the  church  of  Scot- 
 land; and  that  tliis  wa^  judicially  a[)proven  J  734, 
 in  their  meetings  at  Coltargy  and  Dunfermline. 
 Herein  th('y  exhibit  their  reasons  of  secession, 
 and  which  readers  ought  carefully  to  observe,  viz. 
 
 1.  That  the  prevailing  partij,  in  the  establish- 
 ed judicatures,  we7^e  t)r caking  doxvn  the  Preshyte- 
 rian  constitution  of  church  government,  by  tlieir 
 trampling  upon,  and  making  decisions  in  an  or- 
 der quite  contrary  to  that  prescribed  in  the  barri- 
 er acts  of  this  church,  in  her  purest  times,  ena(^ted 
 to  secure  due  deliberation,  in  the  appointment 
 of  standing  laws,  and  general  rules;  by  their  ex- 
 ercising a  lordly  power  over  the  consciences  of 
 Christians,  empowering  heritors  and  elders  to 
 impose  on  them  their  spiritual  guides ;  by  their 
 promoting  the  violent  intrusion  of  |>resentees  up- 
 on reclaiming  congregations;  by  their  censuring 
 and  ejecting    uiiuisters,    merely    for   protesting; 
 
RISE   AND   PROGRESS  OF   THE   SECESSION.       ."^L 
 
 against  a  >inful  art  of  the  General  Assembly  ;  l>y 
 their  allowing  the  Commission  to  take  into  their 
 own  hand  the  Presbytery's  power  in  settling  a 
 pastor,  if  the  expedini?  a  violent  intrusion  was 
 by  the  Presbytery  refused  :  and  by  their  tlircut- 
 ening  tiie  highest  censure  to  these  who  adnjini- 
 stered  sealinj^'  ordinances  to  such  as  coiild  not, 
 in  conscience,  submit  to  the  ministry  (d' intruders. 
 2.  'IMiat  said  prevail  in:;-  party  were  pursuing 
 such  methods  as  Jmd  nii  evident  tendency  to  cornipt 
 the  doctrines  of  truths  contained  in  their  own  Con^ 
 fession  of  Faith;  in  thrir  so  easily  dismissin;^  the 
 process  relative  to  ProlVssor  Simson,  and  refus- 
 ing; judicially  to  assert  the  truth  in  opposition  to 
 his  errors;  in  th<-ir  caressiuL;;  I'rofessor  ('amp- 
 bell,  while  he  spread  his  erroneous  tenets ;  and 
 finally,  in  their  [)ermitting  or  encouraging  pr(»ach- 
 ers  to  entertain  their  hearers  with  dry  harangues, 
 of  almost  mere  Heathen  morality,  instead  of  the 
 gospel  of  Christ 
 
 S.  That  they  rvere  imposinfi;  vpon  ?ninisters  sin- 
 fnt  terms  oj'  conunnniony  even  tlie  breach  of  their 
 ordination-vows,  in  forbearing  a  proper  op[)osi- 
 tion  to  the  prevalent  course  of  apostacy  from  the 
 doctrine,  worship,  discij)line,  and  government  of 
 this  church. 
 
 ^.  That  they  were  co?>tini/infrin  those  evil  nai/s, 
 notu  ithstandina;  of  the  use  of  ordinary  means  to  re- 
 claim  them.  And  which  last  they  took,  as  bring- 
 ing the  matter  to  a  crisis,  leaving  no  probable 
 view  of  redress,  but  m  a  v\  ay  of  se|)arati()n. — In 
 this  testimony,  the  seceding  brethren,  as  on 
 many  other  occasions,  declarcil  their  /e;dous  adhe- 
 rence to  their  ordination  vows,  and  to  every  sub- 
 ordinate standard  espoo-v  I  in  lh<  ir  motlier- 
 ehurcii.     They  likewise   avowed  tiicir  intention 
 
32  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 to  maintain  church-fellowship,  with  all  these  of 
 lier  ministers,  or  members,  who  faithfully  oppos- 
 ed, and  groaned  imder  the  prevalent  course  of 
 defection,  as  o])portunity  should  permit. 
 
 In  I7-^4<  the  Assembly  was  very  diflerent  from 
 some  of  the  precedinj^.  The  better  part  had  vi- 
 gorously bestirred  themselves  in  the  choice  of 
 the  members.  Sundry  corrupt  and  tyrannical 
 courses  received  an  observable  check.  The  Sy- 
 nod of  Perth  was  appointed  to  repone  the  seced- 
 ini^  brethren  to  their  respective  charges  :  but  as 
 this  appointment  represented  the  reposition  as 
 effected  without  condemning  the  act  of  the  pre- 
 ceding Assembly,  or  the  conduct  of  their  Com- 
 mission, these  brethren  accounted  it  as  an  act  of 
 favour,  rather  than  of  justice ;  and  so  deemed 
 the  truths,  which  suffered  along  with  them,  not 
 duly  vindicated.  Hence  they  forebore  return- 
 ing to  the  established  judicatures  upon  such  a 
 foundation.  They  published  the  reasons  of  their 
 conduct,  and  the  terms  upon  which  they  were 
 willing  to  accede  to  the  judicatures.  About  two 
 years  and  a  half,  however,  they  kept  their  meet- 
 ings of  Presbytery,  for  almost  nothing  but  prayer 
 and  conference ;  waiting,  and  wishing,  for  an 
 opportunity  of  an  untainted  return. 
 
 But  observing  the  established  judicatures  fast 
 relapsing  into,  or  proceeding  forward  in,  their 
 former  defection ; — observing  that  Professor 
 Campbell's  sentiment  of  self-love  being  the  great 
 standard  and  motive  of  all  actions,  religious  and 
 moral,  as  varnished  over  by  him,  was  inconsider- 
 ately approven  by  the  Assembly  1736;  and  ob- 
 serving that  the  excellent  acts  of  that  Assembly 
 against  i/ifn/sio?is,  ov  for  orthodox  preaching,  were 
 generallv  disregarded; — they   beuan    to  supply 
 
 1 
 
RISE   AND  PUOGRKSS  OF   THR  SECFSSIOy.       33 
 
 with  sermon  such  oppressed  Christians  as  peti- 
 tioned for  it;  and  Mr.  Wilson  was  appointed  to 
 educate  students  for  the  work  of  the  inin  stry, 
 in  connection  with  them  Meanwhile  M<  >srs. 
 Ralph  Erskine  and  Thomas  Mair,  minister-,  ac- 
 ceded to  the  Associate  Presbytery,  declaring  that 
 they  joined  them  not  as  diffcTent  from,  hut  as  a 
 pait  of  the  church  of  Scothmd,  witnessing"  ai^i)ifist 
 the  corruptions  of  the  prevailing  party  in  her 
 cstahlisheii  judicatures  ;  that  they  intinded  no 
 withdrawment  from  such  i;()(lly  brethren  in  the 
 ministry,  as  were  t^roanini;*  under,  and  wrrst- 
 linir  against  the  then  prevailing  course  of  l)a<  k- 
 sliding;  and  that  thty  resolved  to  return  to  the 
 above-mentioned  judicatures,  whenever  these  re- 
 turned to  their  duty. — 'J'his  form  of  secession  the 
 Associate  Presbytery  cheerfully  accpiiesced  in; 
 and  declared  to  be  in  ellect  the  same  with  their 
 own. 
 
 AJjout  the  same  time,  the  Associate  Presby- 
 tery published  a  skcond  tksi  imony  to  the  doc- 
 trine, worship,  governnunt,  and  disriplinc  of  the 
 church  of  Scothind.  It  was  not  designed  to  state 
 the  grounds  of  secession  ; — lor  thi'  defections  of 
 the  prelatic  p(Tsecutors,  and  of  the  civil  govern- 
 ment, from  neither  of  which  they  made  their  se- 
 cession, were  therein  r(  hearsed  ami  ( ondt  inncd; 
 — but  was  designed  and  calculated  to  represent 
 the  grounds  of  the  T.ord's  controversy  \\  ith  the 
 g(Mieration  ;  calculated  to  i^ive  ajudieial  appro- 
 bation of  former  ste[)s  of  reloi  niatioi),  and  to  con- 
 demn the  steps  of  apostacy  therefrom  ;  and  to 
 condemn  the  prevalent  errors  of  the  time,  and 
 expressly  assert  the  truth,  in  direct  opposition 
 thereto. 
 
 r 
 
3h  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 In  this  testimony,  they  marked  out  and  con- 
 demned the  leadinf^  defections  of  both  church  and 
 state,  from  1650,  when  the  apostacy  remarkably 
 began,  to  17'^G  They  expressly  condemned  the 
 errors  of  Professors  Simson  and  Campbell ;  and 
 shewed  their  contrariety  to  the  word  of  God, 
 and  the  standards  of  this  church.  I'hey  solemnly 
 asserted,  that  the  Old  and  New  Testaments  are 
 not  merely  a  si/J/icienty  and  the  prificipal,  but  the 
 ONLY  RULE  to  dircct  us,  how  to  glorify  God,  and 
 enjoy  him :  that  Jesus  Christ  is  the  supreme,  the 
 only  true  God  ;  the  same  in  substance  and  dig- 
 nity with  his  eternal  Father  :  that  God  from  all 
 eternity  decreed  all  things  according  to  the  coun- 
 sel of  his  own  will ;  and  elected  a  certain  num- 
 ber of  mankind  to  everlasting  life,  of  his  mere 
 good  pleasure,  without  any  regard  to  their  fu- 
 ture good  works,  as  the  condition  or  ground  of 
 his  choice  :  that  God  entered  into  a  covenant  of 
 life,  upon  condition  of  perfect  obedience,  with 
 Adam,  as  the  representative  of  all  his  natural 
 seed  :  that  by  Adam's  breach  of  that  covenant, 
 in  eating  the  forbidden  fruit,  all  men  are  con- 
 ceived and  born  in  sin  ;  are  by  nature  children  of 
 disobedience  and  wrath  ;  and  can  do  nothing  spi- 
 ritually good  :  that  though  there  be  no  nccessaty 
 connection  between  the  natural  seriousness  of 
 unregenerate  men,  and  their  obtaining  of  saving 
 grace ;  yet  it  is  their  duty  carefully  to  attend  the 
 ordinances  of  the  gospel,  as  the  means  whereby 
 God  conveys  his  converting  Spirit  and  influence; 
 that  the  light  of  nature  is  not  sufficient  to  guide 
 fallen  men  to  any  true  or  lasting  happiness  : 
 that  Christ  assumed  our  nature;  is  very  God, 
 and  very  man,  in  two  distinct  natures,  and  one 
 person  for  ever :  that  he,  as  surety,  undertook 
 
BISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION.      S.j 
 
 for  all  the  elect,  and  them  only,  and  gave  to 
 the  law  and  justice  of  God  whatever  ohodience 
 and  satisfaction  they  could  rc(|uire  of  us  :  that 
 his  surety-rii^hteousness,  imputed  to  us,  is  the 
 only  foundation  of  our  forgiveness  of  sin,  ac- 
 ceptance into  favour  with  God,  and  title  to 
 eternal  life,  and  not  any  thing  wrought  in,  or 
 done  by  us  :  that  want  of  conformity  to  Ciod's 
 law,  in  heart  or  life,  is  truly  and  properly  sin  ; 
 and  that  sinning  and  suffering  will  \)v  the  misery 
 of  the  damned  in  hell  through  all  eternity:  that 
 all  believers  in  Christ  are  fully  delivered  from  the 
 moral  law  as  a  covenant  of  works,  so  as  to  be 
 thereby  neither  justified  nor  condemned  :  but  are 
 for  ever  under  it,  as  a  binding  rule  of  obedience, 
 given  by  Jkhovah  the  Creator  and  Redeemer  of 
 man  :  that  God  needs  nothing  from,  nor  can  be 
 profited  by,  any  creature;  and  therefore  rewards 
 their  good  actions  merely  of  his  own  free  will 
 and  gracious  bounty  :  that  not  self-interest  or 
 pleasure,  but  the  holy  law  of  God,  is  the  supreme 
 and  sole  standard  of  all  actions,  religious  or  mo- 
 ral :  that  not  self  love,  but  a  view  of  the  glorious 
 excellencies  of  God,  as  revealed  in  Christ,  and  a 
 kindly  regard  to  his  authority,  are  the  leading 
 motives  of  our  love  and  obedience  to  him  :  that 
 no  believer  can  ever  totally  or  finally  fall  away 
 from  his  state  of  grace  ;  nor  did  Christ's  disci- 
 ples, while  he  was  in  the  grave,  account  him  a 
 downright  impostor:  that  Jesus  (Mirist  a/onc  is 
 the  Iving  and  head  of  his  church  ;  to  whom  alone 
 it  belongs  to  give  unto  her,  laws,  ortlinances,  and 
 officers ;  and  to  whom  (tfoni'  Iut  officers  are  sub- 
 ject in  their  spiritual  ministrations:  that  Christ 
 hath  in  his  word  prescribed  a  paiticular  form  of 
 government  for  his   church,  distinct  from,   and 
 
S6  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 not  subordinate  to,  the  civil  magistrate:  that  the 
 form  of  government  a|)|)ointed  by  him  to  conti- 
 nue in  his  New-Testament  church  till  his  second 
 coming,  is  the  Presbyterian,  according  to  which 
 there  is  no  office  above  that  of  a  pastor ;  and 
 congregational  sessions,  consisting  of  a  minister 
 or  ministers,  eldeis  an  i  deacons,  which  are  sub- 
 ordinated to  Presbyteries,  or  classes,  and  these 
 to  Synods;  and  he  hath  appointed  no  other  form 
 either  Independent,  Episcopalian,  or  Erastian  : 
 that  Christ  hath  entrusted  this  government,  not 
 to  all  church •members,but  to  office-bearers,  whose 
 power  is  entirely  subordinated  to  the  laws  de- 
 clared in  his  word  :  that  these  officers  have  power 
 and  warrant  from  Christ,  to  hold  General  As- 
 semblies, and  other  ecclesiastical  courts,  as  often 
 as  is  necessary  for  the  good  of  the  church  :  that 
 Christ's  kingdom,  being  oi  a  spirituaf  nature,  the 
 ministers,  and  other  officers  thereof,  ought  to  be 
 set  over  congregations,  by  the  call  and  consent 
 of  such  therein,  as  are  admitted  to  full  commu- 
 nion in  all  her  sealing  ordinances,  no  person's 
 vote  being  preferred  upon  any  secular  acconnt. 
 
 Along  with  this  assertory  declaration  of  truth, 
 they  condemned  and  declared  their  detestation 
 of  the  contrary  errors.  They  professed  their 
 hearty  adherence  to  the  Westminster  Confession 
 of  Faith,  Larger  and  Shorter  Catechisms,  Di- 
 rectory for  Worshij),  and  Form  of  Chuich  Cro- 
 vernnient.  I'hey  declared  their  adherence  to  the 
 National  Covenant,  as  exj)lained  to  abjure  Pre- 
 lacy, the  civil  places  and  power  of  kirknun,  and 
 the  Articles  ot  Ferth;  and  to  the  Solemn  League 
 and  Covenant  of  the  three  kingdoms ;  and  to 
 every  act  of  Asst  mbly,  or  other  testimony,  in  so 
 far  as  calcidated  to  promote  or  maintain  tlieir 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.      37 
 
 fathers'  covenanted  work  of  reformation.  And, 
 finally,  they,  in  their  judicative  capacity,  declar- 
 ed their  adherence  to  the  representations  present- 
 ed by  them  to  the  Commission  of  1733;  to  their 
 first  testimony;  and  to  their  reasons  of  not  acced- 
 int^  to  the  judicatures  of  the  established  church  : 
 and  so  made  those  papers  as  really  parts  of  this 
 testimony,  as  if  they  had  been  v^holly  engrossed 
 therein. 
 
 This  testimony,  as  Mr.  Wilson,  its  principal 
 drawer  and  defendant,  observes,  was  never  in- 
 tended for  a  new  standard,  but  for  a  public  ad- 
 herence to  such  as  had  been  long  acknowledged 
 by  the  nation.  The  extent  of  it,  especially  when 
 considered  as  comprehending  the  three  pamph- 
 lets just  now  mentioned,  made  it  very  unfit  to 
 be  adopted  as  an  ecclesiastical  standard.  Per- 
 sons, iiowever,  who  acceded  to,  or  joined  with 
 the  seceding  brethren,  commonly  professed  their 
 aj)probation  thereof,  so  far  as  they  understood  it; 
 but  it  must  not  be  imagined  they  were  required 
 to  believe  the  real  certainty  of  every  narrative  of 
 fact  therein  contained.  To  have  demanded  a 
 religious  adherence  to  narrations  of  fact,  depend- 
 ing entirely  on  the  testimony  of  fallible  histori- 
 ans, would  have  been  antichristian  tyranny. 
 Knowing  the  hundreds  and  thousands  of  mis- 
 takes observed  in  the  most  noted  histories ; 
 knowing  the  ignorance  and  fallibility  of  mankind; 
 the  seceding  ministers  abhorred  the  thought  of 
 having  their  followers'  faith  to  stand  in  the  wis- 
 dom or  authority  of  men  ;  and  not  wholly  in  the 
 wisdom,  power,  and  veracity  of  God.  ^Nlr.  A\'il- 
 son  openly  averred,  that  IMr.  Currie's  charging 
 this  testimony  with  twenty-luiir  historical  mis- 
 
38  AN   HISTORICAL   ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 takes,  no  way  aflected  its  proper  substance ;  but 
 was  a  mere  wranti^lin^  about  circumstances;  and 
 that  the  plain  meaning  of  people's  approving  of  it 
 at  their  accession,  was  their  signifying  their  con- 
 jiinciion  with  the  Associate  Preshyterii,  hi  the  same 
 confession  of  the  truths  of  God  held  forth  from  his 
 word,  in  our  received  standards.  Now,  it  is  no- 
 tour, that  not  the  word  of  God,  but  acts  of  Par- 
 liament, or  Assembly,  or  like  fallible  vouchers, 
 support  the  historical  narrations  therein  con- 
 tained. 
 
 Though  plenty  of  objections  were  mustered 
 up  against  this  testimony  ;  some  reckoning  it 
 sinfully  defective,  and  others  reckoning  it  as  much 
 redundant ;  yet  the  prevailing  party  of  the  mini- 
 stry in  the  nation,  proceeding  on  in  their  defec- 
 tion, and  a  multitude  of  them  giving  new  offence, 
 by  reading  from  their  pulpit,  on  the  Lord's  day, 
 an  act  of  Parliament  for  discovering  the  murder- 
 ers of  Captain  Porteous,  in  which  that  civil  court 
 had  claimed  a  spiritual  headship  over  the  church, 
 constituting  themselves  judges  of  ministers'  qua- 
 lifications to  sit  in  her  courts,  and  threatening  ec- 
 clesiastical eensure,  if  their  civil  authority  was 
 not  obeyed  ;  two  ministers,  and  a  multitude  of 
 elders  and  private  Christians,  joined  the  seced- 
 ing brethren.  'J'lie  reading  of  Porteous's  paper 
 from  the  pulpit,  in  the  time  of  divine  service, 
 they  reckoned  a  very  criminal  [)rofanation  of  the 
 Christian  Sabbath  ;  and  a  sunjeetion  of  the  read- 
 ers to  the  Parliament  as  their  spiritual  head. 
 The  offended  people  warmly  j)etitioned  the  As- 
 sociate Presbytery  to  afford  them  sermon,  and 
 liold  fasts  with  them,  that  they  might  mourn 
 over  ti)e  apostacy  and  wickedness  of  the  times. 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.     S9 
 
 Their  requests  were  granted,  but  not  without 
 much  deliberation. 
 
 These  people  were  far  from  accounting  their 
 leaving  of  their  ministers  unreasonable  or  ground- 
 less. They  knew  God  had  commanded  his  peo- 
 ple to  come  out  of  a  corrupt  church,  that  they 
 might  not  be  partakers  in  her  plagues*;  that  he 
 had  commanded  them  to  withdraw  from  brethren 
 walking  disorderly!;  that  he  had  charged  them 
 to  mark  such,  as  by  their  evil  courses  caused  of- 
 fences, and  to  avoid  themf;  had  charged  them 
 to  beware  of  the  legal  leaven  or  doctrine  of  the 
 Pharisees,  and  of  the  leaven  of  Herod  ||.  In  vain 
 you  told  them  that  Jesus  Christ,  and  his  pro- 
 phets and  apostles,  maintained  communion  with 
 the  Jewish  church :  they  knew  the  qualifications 
 of  New  Testament  ministers  did  not  turn  upon 
 natural  descent  and  ceremonial  purity,  so  much 
 as  under  the  Old  ;  but  upon  things  spiritual  and 
 moral.  They  knew  men  did  not  now  cut  off 
 themselves  from  all  public  ordinances,  by  with- 
 drawing from  a  particular  national  church,  as 
 they  did  when  there  was  but  one  tabernacle  or 
 temple,  wherein  God  caused  his  own  name  to 
 dwell.  They  defied  you  to  prove,  that  Jesus, 
 and  his  prophets  or  apostles,  countenanced  the 
 corrupt  party  in  their  time  :  they  granted  that 
 he,  just  before  his  death,  required  his  disciples 
 to  regard  the  civil  rulers  who  sat  in  Muses'  seat: 
 but  they  challenged  you  to  prove,  he  required 
 them  to  hear  the  ecclesiastical  officers  who  sat 
 ill  Aaron's:  they  challenged  you  to  prove,  that 
 Nicodemus,  and  Joseph  of  Arimathea,  sat  in  the 
 
 •  Uev.  xviii.  4.  f  2  Thcs.  iii.  G.  X  liom.  xvi.  i: 
 
 H  Mark  viii.  l). 
 
40  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 Jewish  Sanhedrim,  after  it  condemned  the  Lord 
 of  glory ;  or,  tliuii^^h  they  had  continued  in  this 
 civil  court,  with  very  wicked  companions,  to 
 prove  from  thence,  our  duty  to  continue  in  a 
 particular  church,  or  with  a  particular  part  there- 
 of, ohstinate  in  their  wickedness  and  apostacy. 
 In  vain  you  told  them,  God,  in  the  apostolic  age, 
 enjoined  no  separation  from  the  churches  of  Co- 
 rinth, Galatia,  Ephesus,  Pergarnos,  and  Thya- 
 tira,  notwithstanding  of  the  various  corruptions 
 therein:  for  they  believed  no  particular  church 
 was  to  be  separated  from,  till  she  appeared  ob- 
 stinate in  apostacy ;  and  they  defied  you  to 
 prove  that  any  of  these  churches  continued  ob- 
 stinately deaf  to  the  apostolic  admonitions  given 
 them.  In  vain  you  told  them,  that  their  with- 
 drawment  was  a  breaking  up  of  the  communion 
 of  saints,  and  an  interpretative  condemnation  of 
 Christ  for  holding  commimion  with  any  who  did 
 not  withdraw  along  with  them :  they  knew  God 
 had  charged  them  to  withdraw  even  from  bke- 
 THKKN  who  walked  disorderly  :  they  challenged 
 you  to  shew,  how  one,  who  was  bound  by  the 
 word  of  God,  and  solemn  covenant  with  him,  to 
 maintain  the  doctrine  contained  in  the  Confes- 
 sion of  Faith,  and  Presbyterian  govern mc-nt, 
 could,  without  any  disorder  or  degree  of  scan- 
 dal, countenance  or  bid  God  speed  a  minister 
 who  was  obstinately  overthrowing  ^aid  doctrine 
 or  government :  they  knew  God  had  charged 
 them  to  buy  the  truth,  and  not  sell  it ;  no,  not 
 though  it  were  to  obtain  fellowship  witli  good 
 men  :  they  knew  not  how  inward  grace,  which 
 lies  in  the  hidden  man  of  the  heart,  could  be  the 
 term  of  visible  church  communion,  especially  to 
 such  as  cannot  search  the  heart,  and  try  the  reins 
 7 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE   SRCT.,SST0N.       ii 
 
 ef  their  neighbour:  they  challeng-ed  you  to  prove 
 that  there  is  no  real  saint  in  the  Popisii  church, 
 from  which,  notwithstanding,  (lod  expressly  re- 
 quires us  to  withdraw;  or  to  prove  that  Luther 
 and  Calvin's  obedience  to  that  (  ommand,  auu)unt- 
 ed  to  a  breaking^  up  the  communion  of  the  saints, 
 and  was  an  interpretative  condemning-  of  Christ, 
 merely  because  some  saint,  whom  he  loves  to  the 
 end,  and  vvaters  every  moment,  sinfully  disobey- 
 ed his  solemn  mandate,  and  did  not  come  along 
 with  them.  "Do  we,"  said  they, ''condemn  Christ 
 for  retaining  his  saints  always  in  his  everlasting 
 arms,  if  we  refuse  to  sit  down  with  them  at  a 
 communion  table,  that  moment  they  commit 
 adultery,  as  David;  idolatry,  as  Solomon;  or,  with 
 curses  and  oaths,  deny  their  Master,  as  Peter?" 
 
 They  knew  the  grounds  of  separation  from  a 
 church,  ought  always  to  be  solid  and  weighty  ; 
 such  as  heresy  in  doctrine,  idolatry  in  w«>rship, 
 tyranny  in  government,  violent  intrusion  of  pas- 
 tors, scandalous  lives  of  the  ministry,  or  sinful 
 terms  of  communion:  they  thought  they  had  se- 
 veral of  these  in  their  case.  Knowing  what  vows 
 their  ministers  came  under  at  their  ordination, 
 they  reckoned  them  guilty  of  perjury  and  scan- 
 dal, if  they  were  notorious  breakers  thereof.  If 
 their  pastor  entertained  them  with  legal  and  Ar- 
 minian  harangues,  instead  of  the  gospel  of  Christ, 
 they  tliought  it  full  time  to  flee  from  the  poison, 
 and  go  where  they  might  have  food  for  their 
 souls.  If,  through  his  unfaithfulness,  they,  at 
 the  Lord's  table,  were  in  danger  of  having  tiie 
 elements  to  receive  from  an  elder  knou  n  to  be  a 
 profane  swearer  or  drunkard,  and  to  give  to  a  fel- 
 low-communicant, as  well  known  to  be  a  grossly 
 ignorant,  or    almost  a   praycrlcss  person,  thev 
 
 f 
 
42  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OP  THE 
 
 thought  their  condition  very  unhappy.  If  he  ha- 
 bitually accommodated  the  censures  and  other 
 ordinances  of  the  church,  to  the  humours  of  his 
 hearers,  especially  the  great,  they  suspected  the 
 man-pleascr  could  not  be  a  servant  of  Christ.  If 
 he  was  extremely  slothful  and  careless,  or  more 
 given  to  his  farm  or  carnal  employment,  they 
 susj)ected  Christ  had  not  sent  him,  as  he  had  not 
 given  him  a  spirit  for,  and  love  to  his  work.  If 
 their  pastor  had  a  better  personal  character  than 
 some  others,  but  prostituted  this  gift  of  God,  to 
 support  such  as  were  naughty,  by  assisting  at 
 their  communions,  or  conniving  at  their  sinful 
 procedure  in  judicatures,  they  reckoned  this  a 
 plain  bidding  of  them  God  speed,  and  so  account- 
 ed him  a  noted  partaker  in  their  evil  deeds :  A  lit- 
 tle leaven,  said  they,  leaveneih  the  luhole  lump. 
 
 Nothing  they  more  objected  to  than  the  vio- 
 lent intrusion  of  a  pastor,  by  the  power  and  in- 
 fluence of  a  patron.  They  knew  the  sacred  ora- 
 cles assign  the  choice  of  church-officers  to  adult 
 church-members,  free  of  scandal.  The  hundred 
 and  twenty  disciples  at  Jerusalem,  chose  can- 
 didates for  the  apostleship*.  The  multitude 
 of  the  Christian  people  chose  their  deacons,  and 
 the  apostles  ordained  thcmf .  In  all  the  churches 
 elders,  or  presbyters,  were  ordained  hij  the  election 
 or  siijfrages  of  the  professed  believersi.  Christ 
 charges  his  people  to  try  the  spirits\\ ;  a  sure  proof 
 they  have  some  capacity  for  it :  but  to  what  pur- 
 pose should  they  try  them,  if  they  have  not 
 power  to  choose  the  fit,  and  refuse  the  improper, 
 but  must  accept  whoever  is  imposed  upon  them  ? 
 Christ's  kingdo7n  himself  declared  with  his  dying 
 
 «  Act*  i.  l.>— 2(;.  t  Acts  vi.  1—6.  :;:  Chap.  xiv.  ?3.  Gn 
 
 §    1  John  iv.  I. 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       43 
 
 breath,  is  not  of  this  ivorld,  John  xviii.  36, ;  how- 
 then  is  it  possible  for  civil  property  to  constitute 
 one  a  member,  far  less  a  ruler  thereof?  How- 
 can  civil  property,  however  considerable,  enable 
 the  patron  to  discern  better  than  themselves, 
 what  minister's  talents  are  best  suited,  and  most 
 edifying  to  the  souls  of  such  as  are  taught  ofGod'^ 
 Will  his  civil  property  qualify  him  to  answer  to 
 God  for  all  these  souls,  over  whom  he  imposes  a 
 pastor  ?  Can  civil  property  exalt  a  man  in  spiri- 
 tual things  above  God's  poor  ones,  who  are  rich 
 in  faith,  and  heirs  of  the  kingdom,  which  he  hath 
 promised  to  them  that  love  him  ?  Is  God  a  re- 
 specter of  persons?  If  he  condemn  the  preference 
 of  a  rich  man  to  a  poor,  in  respect  of  a  seat  in 
 our  worshipping  assemblies*,  is  it  possible  that  he, 
 for  the  sake  of  civil  greatness,  will  give  any  man 
 power  to  dispose  of  the  souls  of  his  people,  into 
 the  hand  of  such  spiritual  physicians,  guides,  and 
 governors,  as  the  man  pleaseth  ?  If  one  may 
 choose  his  natural  physician,  is  it  reasonable  to 
 deny  him  the  choice  of  one  for  his  soul  ?  In  a  vo- 
 luntary society,  such  as  the  church,  how  can  one 
 have  the  relation  of  a  minister  to  a  congrega- 
 tion thereof,  fixed,  without,  or  contrary  to  their 
 consent  ?  How  can  we  believe  him  a  messenger 
 of  Christ  ?  How  can  we  pray  for,  or  in  faith  hear 
 him  as  such,  for  whom  Providence  would  never 
 open  a  regular  entrance,  but  he  was  obliged  to 
 be  thrust  in  by  the  window,  as  a  thief  and  a  rob- 
 ber ?  In  vain  you  told  them  of  the  great  man's 
 superior  learning ;  they  had  read  in  their  Bible, 
 that  the  mysteries  of  the  kingdom  are  often  hid 
 from  the  wise  and  prudent  of  this  world,  ajid  re- 
 
 *  James  ii.  1—13. 
 
4l4l  AN   HISTORKAL   ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 vealed  unto  babes ;  and  that  n  >f  many  vnse  men  af- 
 ter the  fie sh,  not  manif  noble  are  called  In  vain 
 you  told  thetn,  that  a  ^ivat  part  of  the  con^rre- 
 gation  were  the  patron's  tenants  or  servants; 
 their  l^ihle  infornu'd  them,  that  in  Christ  there  is 
 neither  male  nor  jhnaU\  bond  nor  free ;  but  Christ 
 is  all  and  in  alt.  In  vain  yon  told  them,  the  rich 
 pai'.i  most,  or  all  of  the  stij)end  ;  they  kncnv  the 
 contrary  ;  that  heritors  purchase  the  lands  with 
 the  burden  of  the  stipend  thereon,  and  so  obtain 
 the '»  at  the  less  prire  :  their  Bible  informed 
 them,  it  was  a  suhckkkm'^,  not  a  Christian  j)rin- 
 ciple,  that  the  spiritual  ^ifts  of  God,  or  privileges 
 of  his  church,  can  l}e  purchasrd  leith  moneif.  In 
 vain  you  told  them,  that  the  residence  of  the 
 great  was  more  fixed  than  of  the  poor  cotta^i^er; 
 they  shewed  you  instances  of  the  poor  remain- 
 ing in  the  same  p  rish  from  generation  to  gene- 
 ration, while  the  rich  had  often  changed  their 
 property  :  they  pointed  out  the  poor  man,  who 
 more  attended  the  gospel,  and  more  prayed  for 
 success  to  it,  and  was  more  a  comfort  to  his  faith- 
 ful minister,  in  one  year,  than  sundry  great  men 
 and  patrons  in  t\\  enty.  To  as  little  purpose  you 
 told  them  that  the  civil  law  compelled  to  settle 
 the  presentee,  be  the  opposition  what  it  would; 
 they  knew  the  contra; y  ;  and  moreover  their  Bi- 
 ble had  taught  them,  that  luc  ought  to  obei/  God 
 rather  than  men. 
 
 For  what  simony,  sacrilege,  perjury,  and  cruel 
 wasting  of  the  church,  said  they,  doth  patronage 
 open  a  door?  To  [)lease  a  frienti,  to  gratify  or  re- 
 ward a  chaplain,  the  presentee  is  complimented 
 with  the  Sdcred  function  :  the  souls  of  men  are 
 sold  over  to  his  care,  and  the  devoted  revenues 
 secured  to  his  purse  ;   and  what  hinders  him  to 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION.      45 
 
 return  some  obsequious  compliance,  or  carnal  ac- 
 knowledgment, for  the  presentation  lie  receives? 
 How  readily  are  the  lionour  of  Christ,  and  the 
 salvation  of  men,  thus  betrayed  into  the  hand  of 
 their  open  adversaries?  A  notorious  infidel,  a 
 blasphemer,  a  profaner  of  the  Sabbath,  an  athe- 
 istical neglecter  of  the  worship  of  God  in  his 
 closet  and  family,  an  unclean  whoremonger,  an 
 habitual  drunkard;  in  fine,  one  who  has  not  so 
 much  rt-ligion  as,  with  Satan,  to  believe  and  trem- 
 ble^ if  he  is  a  patron,  chooses  ambassadors  for 
 Christ,  and  pastors  to  the  souls  of  his  people. 
 Will  this  man  commit  the  presentation  for  the 
 ministry  to  faijhful,  or  not  rather  to  errone- 
 ous, com[)laisant,  and  naughty  men? 
 
 By  patronage,  how  readily  may  one  be  admit- 
 ted to  the  sacred  office,  who,  at  his  ordination, 
 will  solemnly  declare  and  vow  before  God,  an- 
 gels, and  men,  that  he  b -lieves  the  whole  doc- 
 trine c(»ntained  in  the  Westminister  Confes- 
 sion of  Faith  to  be  founded  on  the  word  of 
 God  ;  and  that  he  will  maintain  and  defend  it 
 in  opposition  to  all  Popish,  Arian,  Arminian, 
 and  other  errors  :  and  yet,  in  contradiction  to 
 his  sworn  confession,  will  that  moment  believe, 
 and  w  ill  afterward  habitually  or  frequently  ])reach 
 to  his  people,  Arminian  and  other  errors: — in 
 contradiction  to  his  sworn  confession,  will  in- 
 dulge his  hearers  in  the  neglect  of  Sabbnth-saiic- 
 tification,  and  of  the  daily,  secret,  and  private 
 worship  of  God  : — in  contradiction  to  his  sworn 
 confession,  will  habitually  baptize  the  children 
 ot  such  whose  gross  ignorance  unfits  them  to 
 profess  their  faith,  and  whose  notour  wicked- 
 ness demi'nstrates,  they  intend  no  obedience  to 
 Christ  \ — and  will  admit,  perhaps,  w  ithout  any 
 
46  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 trial,  to  the  Christian  feast,  persons  who  know 
 not  the  very  first  principles  of  the  oracles  of  God; 
 or  who  are  openly  wicked,  swearers,  drunkards, 
 whoremongers,  6cc.  ? 
 
 How  readily  may  one  he  admitted,  who,  at  his 
 ordination,  will  solemnly  avow  that  he  helieves 
 the  Preshytcrian  government  and  discipline  to  be 
 founded  on,  and  aj^reeahle  to  the  word  of  God; 
 and  engage  that,  to  the  utmost  of  his  power,  he 
 will  maintain  and  defend  it  all  the  days  of  his 
 life;  while,  in  contradiction  thereto,  he  that  very 
 moment  improves  a  Popish  presentation,  as  the 
 whole  or  chief  part  of  his  call  to  that  office,  and 
 intends  to  encourage  others  in  doing  the  like  : — 
 in  contradiction  to  his  vow,  is  constantly  dispos- 
 ed to  ridicule  our  covenant-engagements,  to 
 maintain  said  government  and  discipline;  and 
 our  martyrs  who  suffered  in  adherence  thereto; 
 and,  as  oft  as  occasion  permits,  will  assist  in 
 breaking  down  various  points  of  Presbyterian 
 government ;  will  perv^ert  the  discipline,  over- 
 looking or  protecting  those  guilty  of  error  and 
 scandal,  and  censuring  the  conscientious  adhe- 
 rents to  truth  ;  or  at  least  without  protesting 
 against,  or  inward  grief  for  them,  will  witness  at- 
 tacks on  the  doctrine,  worship,  discipline,  or  go- 
 vernment of  Christ  ? 
 
 By  patronage,  how  readily  may  one  be  admit- 
 ted to  the  ministry,  who,  at  his  ordination,  will 
 solemnly  affirm,  that  zeal  for  the  glory  of  God, 
 love  to  Jesus  Christ,  and  desire  of  the  salvation 
 .of  men,  not  any  worldly  interest  or  view,  are  his 
 chief  motives  to  undertake  that  office ;  and  that 
 he  hath  used  no  undue  means,  by  himself  or 
 others,  to.  procure  his  call  ;  while  it  is  notourly 
 known  he,  by  himself  or  friend,  solicited,  at  least 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       47 
 
 accepted,  a  Popish  presentation,  to  procure,  or 
 rather  instead  of,  a  call ;  and  whose  future  un- 
 concern for  his  flock,  attended  with  a  sharp  look- 
 out for  his  stipend,  will  plainly  manifest,  that 
 not  zeal  for  the  glory  of  God,  love  to  Christ,  or 
 desire  of  men's  salvation,  but  worldly  views  and 
 interest,  were  his  chief  motives  to  undertake  that 
 work  ? 
 
 Hereby  one  is  readily  admitted  to  the  sacred 
 function,  who,  in  his  ordination- vows,  will  so- 
 lemnly engage  to  rule  well  his  own  family ;  to 
 live  a  holy  and  circumspect  life ;  and  faithfully, 
 diligently,  and  cheerfully  to  discharge  all  the 
 parts  of  his  ministerial  work  ;  who,  in  contradic- 
 tion to  these  vows,  will  frequently  indulge  him- 
 self in  such  loose  and  carnal  behaviour  as  no  way 
 becomes  a  follower  and  messenger  of  Christ ; 
 will  too  often  neglect  the  morning  and  evening 
 sacrifice  of  secret  or  family  worship  ;  will  almost 
 wholly  neglect  the  religious  instruction  of  his  chil- 
 dren or  servants  ;  will  witness  his  hearers  pro- 
 fanely swear,  or  prostitute  the  Sabbath,  without 
 administering  a  shadow  of  reproof  to  them;  will 
 flatter  men,  especially  if  great,  in  a  sinful  course, 
 and  encourage  them  to  hope  that  their  good 
 works  will  recommend  them  to  the  favour  of 
 God ; — who  will,  in  Jesus'  name,  attest  elders 
 to  the  General  Assembly,  as  persons  of  a  sober 
 and  Christian  practice,  strict  observers  of  the 
 Sabbath,  punctual  attenders  upon  public  ordi- 
 nances, regular  maintainers  of  the  daily  worship 
 of  God  in  their  faniLlies,  when  he  knows  for  cer- 
 tain the  truth  of  the  very  reverse  ;  will  cheer- 
 fully, and  without  trial,  admit  vile  persons  to 
 partake  of  the  sacramental  food  of  the  chikhen 
 of  Christ ;  will  spend  his  precious,  his  devoted 
 
48  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 hours  in  idle  chat,  or  in  overseeing  farms,  or  per- 
 lisini^  romances  and  plays;  and  by  nejj^lectin^  to 
 visit  his  people,  even  when  sick  and  dyinp^ ;  by 
 nei^lectin<i^  to  catechise  them,  especially  such  as 
 are  of  ai;e  or  hii;li  rank;  and  by  his  preaching 
 about  an  hour  on  Sa!)batli,  for  the  most  of  the 
 year,  and  the  like;  will  plainly  shew  the  mini- 
 sterial work  to  be,  not  his  pleasure,,  but  his  task, 
 which,  for  the  sake  ot  his  benefice,  he  must  un- 
 dergo. 
 
 In  fine,  said  they,  by  patronae^e  one  may  be 
 admitted  for  a  Presbyterian  minister,  who,  if 
 searched  out,  may  be  found  an  almost  Papist  or 
 Heathen  ;  for,  does  he  not  seemingly  believe  the 
 lawfulness  of  Jesuitic  equivocation,  or  the  vali- 
 dity of  Popish  dispensations  to  sin,  who,  in  the 
 above  manner,  solemnly  vows,  and  constantly 
 practises  the  very  reverse?  If  he  contemn,  if  he 
 jest  at  part  of  the  sacred  page  ;  if  his  sermons 
 and  practice  mark  him  determined  to  know  every- 
 thing rather  than  Jesus  Christ,  and  him  crucijicd; 
 has  he  not  practically  denied  the  Christian  faith, 
 and  become  worse  than  an  infidel?  If  he  harangue 
 upon  the  dignity  of  our  corrupt  nature,  u])0ii 
 our  ability  to  do  works  sj)iritually  good,  and 
 their  influence  to  recommend  us  to  our  Maker's 
 indulgence  and  favour,  passing  in  silence  the 
 imputation  of  a  Saviour's  |)erfect  righteousness, 
 and  the  free  and  all-powerful  operation  of  his 
 Sj)irit;  is  not  this  the  sum  of  the  abjured  Popish, 
 Pelagian  heresy?  is  not  the  denial,  or  passing 
 in  silence  tlie  appropriating  work  of  saving  faith, 
 much  of  the  same  import  with  holding  the  gene- 
 ral and  doubtsome  faith  of  the  Pope?  If  he  as- 
 sist in  deposing  a  brother  for  conscientious  re- 
 fusal of  an  appointment,  not  warranted  in  the 
 
 7 
 
klSE  AND   PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       49 
 
 word  of  God;  is  he  not  guilty  of  ahjtired  Popish 
 tyranny  against  Christian  liberty?  If  he,  even 
 without  trial,  admit  the  grossly  ignorant,  and 
 notoriously  wicked,  to  the  seals  of  the  new  cove- 
 nant, infers  not  that  his  Popish  belief  that  the 
 very  act  of  receiving  the  sacraments  is  profitable, 
 be  the  manner  of  doing  it  what  will?  Doth  not 
 even  the  private  administration  of  baptism  flow 
 from,  and  tend  to  confirm,  the  Popish  tenet,  of 
 that  ordinance  being  absolutely  necessary  to  sal- 
 vation ?  If  a  minister  entertain  his  people  with 
 flighty  language,  which  they  do  not  understand, 
 is  that  much  different  from  the  Roman  service 
 in  an  unknown  tongue?  If,  instead  of  the  heart- 
 searching  and  affecting  truths  of  God,  he  amuse 
 them  with  antic  gestures,  and  foppish  elocution, 
 wherein  are  these  preferable  to  Romish  beads? 
 Is  not  his  withholding  from  them  proper  instruc- 
 tion, and  carelessly  suffering  them  to  continue  in 
 gross  ignorance,  a  practical  holding  of  his  H<)li- 
 ness's  maxim,  that  ionorance  is  the  mo/her  of  devo- 
 tion^ If  he  dismiss  from  public  censure,  without 
 appearance  of  sorrow  for  the  offence;  or,  if  he 
 accept  or  allow  the  acceptance  of  money,  instead 
 of  public  satisfaction  for  scandal,  gives  he  not  in 
 to  the  abjured  Popish  penance?  If  he  pursue  for, 
 if  he  cheerfully  accept  his  l)enefice,  while  he  doth 
 as  little  for  it  as  possible,  is  not  this  an  imita- 
 tion of  the  Romish  lazy  monks? 
 
 To  such  purpose  reasoned  the  people  who  left 
 their  pastors  and  joined  the  secession.  Too  many 
 of  the  above-mentioned  j)ossible  fruits  of  patro- 
 nage they  thought  plainly  marked  in  the  con- 
 duct of  several  of  the  intruded.  Where  no  vio- 
 lent intrusion  took  place,  it  was  not  always  the 
 worst  minister  who  lost  the  greatest  number  ot 
 
50  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 his  people  to  the  seceders.  The  general  preva- 
 lence of  gross  ignnrance,  and  loose  living,  in  a 
 congregation,  often  proved  an  eflectual  bulwark 
 against  the  progress  of  the  secession.  But  where 
 a  diligent  pastor  had  trained  up  his  people  in  the 
 knowledge  of  their  standards ;  if  he  died,  or 
 stumbled  into  some  leading  defection,  there  was 
 oft  a  crowding  towards  it.  Not  a  few,  at  the 
 first,  represented  their  grievances  to  their  pas- 
 tor, before  they  left  him.  These  generally  ob- 
 tained but  small  satisfaction  ;  and  some  of  them 
 were  excommunicated  for  their  pains  ;  so  the 
 course  came  to  be  frequently  disused"". 
 
 jMany  who  left  their  established  pastors, 
 thought  they  were  bound  to  train  up  their  chil- 
 dren in  the  way  wherein  they  should  go,  that 
 when  old,  they  might  not  depart  from  it.  They 
 thought  themselves  obliged  to  train  up  their  chil- 
 dren witnesses  for  God,  as  well  as  themselves. 
 They  durst  not  hazard  their  childrens'  souls  with 
 a  naughty,  legal,  or  lazy  pastor ;  or  who  had  no 
 token  of  a  mission  from  Christ ;  or  who  prosti- 
 tuted his  good  character,  by  assisting  the  naughty 
 on  sacramental  occasions,  ^:c.  any  more  than  their 
 own.  They  knew  not  how  what  was  poisonous, 
 hurtful,  or  inex[)edient  to  the  aged,  could  be 
 nourishing,  harmless,  and  fit  for  the  young. 
 Tlieir  cause  they  accounted  the  cause  of  God; 
 and  trembled  at  the  tiiought  of  having  a  hand 
 
 •  A  late  author  proposes  the  hurt  done  to  tlie  wealth  of  the  nation,  by 
 the  Secession,  in  the  payment  of  stijHjruls  to  so  many  secetling  ministers,  as 
 a  jwwerful  reason  for  endeavouring  to  crush  the  Secession  :  but  let  him 
 know,  that  if  seceders  act  in  character,  they  can  easily  save  as  much  time 
 and  expense,  from  the  service  of  Satan,  in  the  articles  of  pride,  dnmken- 
 ness,  iVc.  as  will  fully  answer  what  is  required  for  their  peculiar  circum- 
 stance* in  religious  uti'airs;  and,  it  is  belie  veil,  that  author  meets  with  as  fen 
 kcccders  either  bankiupts  or  beggars,  as  he  docs  o(  his  own  party. 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       51 
 
 in  its  dropping",  and  being  buried  in  their  house. 
 The  scripture  had  informed  them  that  children 
 left  to  themselves  bring  their  parents  to  shame. 
 They  observed  that  few  seceders'  children  whom, 
 while  under  age,  their  parents  had  not  trained 
 up  in  their  own  way,  comforted  and  honoured 
 these  parents  with  much  appearance  of  serious 
 godliness :  and  therefore  they  caused  their  little 
 ones  attend  the  seceding  preachers  as  well  as 
 themselves. 
 
 Numbers  of  them  even  carried  their  seceding 
 views  into  the  affair  of  their  marriage.  In  obe- 
 dience to  our  valuable  laws,  civil  and  ecclesias- 
 tical, they  so  generally  detested  clandestine  mar- 
 riages, that  for  many  years  an  instance  of  it  was 
 scarce  found  among  them.  Clandestine  mar- 
 riage they  looked  on  as  sinful  in  a  variety  of 
 respects. 
 
 1.  Sinful,  as  contrary  to  the  very  law  of  na- 
 ture, which  suggests,  that  an  entrance  into  the 
 nuptial  state  should  be  public,  in  order  to  pre- 
 vent future  solicitations  of  persons  concerned,  to 
 uncleanness,  or  marriage  with  another.  Hence 
 it  is  the  common  law  or  custom  of  every  nation 
 under  heaven,  except  where  the  sexes  live  in  the 
 manner  of  beasts,  to  have  marriage  publicly  in- 
 timated or  celebrated.  Thus  even  nature  itself 
 teaches  us,  1  Cor.  xi.  14. 
 
 2.  Sinful,  as  it  is  a  rebellion  against  the  pru- 
 dent regulations  appointed,  repeatedly  appoint- 
 ed, in  this  and  other  Christian  kingdoms  and 
 churches,  in  the  purest  of  times.  In  these  clandes- 
 tine marriage  hath  been,  not  by  a  few  weak  in- 
 dividuals, but  by  the  collective  wisdom  of  both 
 church  and  state,  prohibited  under  severe  cen- 
 sures and  penalties,  as  a  scandalous  and  criminal 
 
 7 
 
J2  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 nuisance  to  both  Their  lawful  statutes  God 
 himself  ado|)ts,  and  commands  us  to  obey  for 
 conscience  sake,  and  under  pain  of  damnation, 
 Rom.  xiii.  I — .3.  1   Pet.  ii.  IS.  Heb.  xiii.  7,  17. 
 
 S.  Sinful,  as  contrary  to  the  manner  of  mar- 
 ria<j:es  aj)jiroven  in  Scripture.  Both  in  the  Old  and 
 New  Testament,  BKritorHiNG  is  represented  as 
 antecedent  to  marriage,  Exod.  xxi.8.  and  xxii.  16. 
 L'  V.  xix.  20.  Deut.  xx.  7.  and  xxii  2.^3,  27,  28.  and 
 xxviii.  30.  Matt.  i.  18.  he  marriages  of  Jacob, 
 Gen.xxix  22.  Sampson,  Judg.  xiv.  1 — 8.  at  Cana 
 of(Talilee,  John  ii.  1  —  1 1.  were  public.  The  allu- 
 sion to  marriage.  Psal.  xlv-  9 — 15.  Christ's  pa- 
 rables of  the  cliildren  of  the  bride-chamber ;  mar- 
 riage of  the  King's  son  ;  and  of  the  ten  virgins, 
 Matt,  ix  15.  and  xxii.  i  —  U3.  and  xxv.  1 — 13, 
 do  all  suppose  the  universal  custom  of  public 
 marriage, 
 
 4.  Sinful,  as  it  includes  a  rash  and  indelibe- 
 rate rushing  into  a  most  important  state  of  life, 
 deeply  connected  with  the  glory  of  God,  the  or- 
 der of  his  church,  and  the  temporal,  spiritual, 
 and  eternal  happniess  or  misery  of  the  persons 
 concerned,  and  their  seed; — contrary  to  all  these 
 Scriptures  which  require  diseretion,  deliberation, 
 and  circumspection  and  wisdom  in  our  conduct, 
 Psal  cxii.  5.  Eccl.  v.  2.  Isa.  xxviii.  16.  Prov.  xix. 
 2.  Eph   v.  15. 
 
 5.  Sinful,  as  it  d(^priv^s  parents  of  their  due 
 honour  and  authority,  and  robs  them  of  their 
 niost  precious  pro|)erty  on  earth — their  children. 
 When  (:iod  created  Adam  and  Eve,  he,  as  their 
 parent,  formally  joined  them  in  marriage,  Gen. 
 ii.  18 — 25.  Nothing  is  more  plainly  command- 
 ed of  God,  than  that  parents  should  have  a  prin- 
 cipal hand  in  disposing  of  their  children  in  mar- 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       53 
 
 riage,  Exod.  xxxiv.  16.  Deut.  vii.  S.  1  Cor.  vii. 
 38.  How  rebellious  then,  against  him,  must  it 
 be,  for  children  to  dispose  of  themselves,  with- 
 out consulting  their  parents  !  How  base  ingrati- 
 tude thus  to  requite  parents,  who  have  with  much 
 labour,  care,  and  expense,  brought  them  up ! 
 How  dishonest  to  dispose  of  that  property  of 
 their  parents,  which  is  dearer  to  them  than  ei- 
 ther money  or  goods,  without  their  consent;  and 
 that,  too  often,  to  the  spiritual,  if  not  temporal 
 and  eternal  ruin  of  themselves  and  their  seed! 
 How  contrary  this  to  God's  command  of  honour- 
 ing, obeying,  and  dealing  honestly  with  parents! 
 Exod.  XX.  12.  Eph.  vi.  1,  2.   Prov.  xxviii.  24. 
 
 6.  Sinful,  as  therein  a  solemn  oath  is  pro- 
 faned, being  used  in  an  ordinance  of  Satan,  an 
 irregular  method  of  marriage,  and  given  to  one 
 who  is  ordinarily  no  more  than  a  profligate  va- 
 gabond, who  basely  takes  upon  himself  to  admi- 
 nister the  same  without  any  authority  from  ei- 
 ther church  or  state.  How  directly  contrary  this 
 to  that  awful  command,  thou  shalt  not  take  (he 
 name  of  the  Lord  thy  God  in  vain,  for  the  Lord 
 will'  not  hold  him  guiltless  that  taketh  his  name  in 
 vain  !  Exod.  xx.  7. 
 
 7.  Sinful,  as  it  is  a  manifest  fellowship  with 
 the  unfruitful  works  of  darkness.  It  is  plainly  an 
 institution  of  the  prince  of  darkness,  calculated 
 to  cover  antecedent  fornication,  or  to  introduce 
 persons  into  a  state  and  life  of  adultery  with  such 
 as  stand  married  to  some  others;  and,  by  means  of 
 it,  1  have  known  one  man  married  to  three  or  four 
 wives,  all  alive  at  once.  It  is  a  Satanical  inven- 
 tion for  the  speedy  gratification  of  burning  fleshly 
 lust,  and  for  catching  a  claim  to  some  external 
 property,  in  a   manner  indirect  and  dishonest. 
 
54f  AN   HISTORICAL   ACCOUXT  OF   THE 
 
 Suppose  some  should  have  none  of  those  base 
 ends  in  view,  yet  herein  they  put  on  the  shame- 
 ful badi^e,  and  render  themselves  so  like  the 
 others,  that  the  world  cannot  distinguish  between 
 them  ;  and  so  they  justify,  encouraf^e,  and  hard- 
 en them  in  their  sin; — in  much  the  same  man- 
 ner as  one  would  encourap^e  and  harden  people 
 in  whoredom,  should  he,  while  his  own  house  is 
 at  hand,  wittingly  take  his  lodging  and  victuals 
 in  a  public  stew,  suppose  he  should  never  so  much 
 as  touch  one  of  the  harlots  within.  In  this  light, 
 how  contrary  are  such  marriages  to  1  Thess.  v. 
 22.  Abstain  from  all  appearance  of  evil:  Eph.  v. 
 1 1.  Have  no  fellowship  with  the  unfruitful  works  o/' 
 darkness,  but  rather  repi'ove  them  ?  And  how 
 plainly  a  conscjiting  with  thieves,  and  partaking 
 with  vile  adulterers?  Psal  1.  18. 
 
 8.  And  hence  sinful,  as  it  imprints  a  very 
 public  and  lasting  blot  upon  our  Christian  cha- 
 racter, wiiich  is  very  precious,  and,  as  well  as  our 
 body  and  soul,  is  in  baptism  devoted  to  God. 
 How  contrary  to  Scripture,  Prov.  xxii.  1 .  Eccl. 
 vii.  1.  do  devote  that  character,  which  ought  to 
 be  an  ornament  to  Christ  and  the  Gospel,  Tit. 
 ii.  10.  to  be  a  chariot  lov  Satan,  in  which  he  may 
 ride  triumpliant  against  Ciirist  and  his  church, 
 and  insult  the  order  and  decency  prescribed  in 
 his  word ! 
 
 9.  SiNFCL,  as  in  the  case  of  Christians  it  gives 
 a  most  public  offence  to  the  church,  and  occa- 
 sions a  reproach  and  blasphemy  of  the  name  of 
 God  among  the  profane,  contrary  to  1  Cor.  x. 
 *31,  32.  Rom.  ii.  21..  iMatt.  xviii.  7. 
 
 10.  Sinful,  as  directly  contrary  to  tlie  express 
 ]aw^  of  Christ,  of  marrying  onlj^  in  the  Lord,  that 
 is,  in  the  way  of  consulting  the  Lord  for  direc- 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       5!i 
 
 tion;  with  such  only  as  appear  to  fear  the  Lord, 
 and  in  a  way  calculated  to  bring  the  blessing  of 
 the  Lord  upon  their  family — and  of  doinfr  all 
 things  decent! ij  and  in  order — and  to  the  use  of  cdi- 
 fpng,  1  Cor.  vii.  30.  and  xiv.  26,  40. 
 
 11.  Sinful,  as  it  implies  a  contempt  of  the 
 awful  warnings  which  God,  in  his  word  and  pro- 
 vidence, hath  given  against  such  marriages ;  and 
 as,  without  a  thoroi!igh  repentance,  it  is  calculat- 
 ed to  bring  the  judgments  of  God  upon  the  per- 
 sons guilty,  and  their  posterity  after  them.  The 
 only  clear  instances  of  such  marriage,  and  in  which 
 the  consent  of  parents  was  contemned,  recorded 
 in  Scripture,  are  three  ;  and  all  followed  with 
 the  terrible  vengeance  of  God,  The  professing 
 descendants  of  Seth  saw  the  irreligious  daugh- 
 ters of  Cain,  that  they  were  fair,  and  gratified 
 their  inclinations  with  an  immediate  marriaefe. 
 What  followed?  An  universal  brood  of  grace- 
 less profligates  for  their  children,  and  then  an 
 overwhelming  flood  to  drown  both  parents  and 
 
 children,  Gen.  vi.  ] — 8. Another  instance  is 
 
 that  of  Esau.  What  followed?  Grief  to  his  pa- 
 rents, and  an  exclusion  of  himself  and  his  poste- 
 rity from  the  church  of  God,  till  their  remem- 
 brance ceased  from  among  men.  Gen.  xxvi.  34,  35. 
 
 and  xxxvi.  IMal.  i.  2,  3. A  third   instance  is 
 
 that  of  Judah,  who,  at  his  own  hand,  in  a  ramb- 
 ling visit,  married  a  Canaanitish  maid.  What 
 followed  ?  Most  shocking  scenes  of  wickedness 
 
 and  misery  in  his  family,  Gen.  xxxviii On 
 
 many  such  accounts  did  Seceders  consider  clan- 
 destine marriages  as  highly  criminal.  iMany  of 
 them  wedded  only  such  as  were  of,  or  favour- 
 ably disposed  to,  their  own  way.  This,  other 
 circumstances  suitable,  they  thought  most  agree- 
 
56  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 able  to  the  divine  command,  of  bein^  equallij yok- 
 i'dy  and  of  marryin*^  none  apt  to  seduce  them 
 from  the  way  of  the  Lord.  This  course  they 
 thoiit,rht  most  exj)edient  to  promote  religious  in- 
 timacy between  husband  and  wife; — to  promote 
 liarmomy  in  their  family-prayers; — and  to  secure 
 the  careful  education  of  their  children  in  the 
 Avays  of  truth. 
 
 The  secession  had  not  lon^  continued,  when 
 the  connexion  i)etween  the  ministers  and  people 
 became  considerably  strict.  To  have  a  minister 
 without  the  established  church,  and  a  people 
 within  it,  they  could  not  comprehend.  While  they 
 had  freedom  to  continue  within,  they  reckoned 
 it  schismatic  to  own  and  support  a  minister  with- 
 out. To  have  connected  themselves  with  a  se- 
 ceding minister,  by  giving  him  a  civil  bond  for 
 his  stipend,  they  thought  contrary  to  the  nature 
 of  Christ's  kingdom^  which  is  not  of  this  world, 
 and  too  near  a-kin  to  a  giving,  and  an  encourage- 
 ment of  him  to  take,  the  oversight  of  the  flock 
 for  filthy  lucre.  A  promise  or  vow  at  their  ac- 
 cession, never  to  hear  any  but  seceding  mini- 
 sters, w  as,  that  I  know  of,  never  recpiired.  The 
 influence  of  conscience,  real  or  profVssed,  was 
 their  bond  of  connexion.  By  this  the  people  left 
 hearing  many  in  the  establishment,  because  they 
 thought  them  not  apparently  messengers  of  Christ. 
 They  left  hearing  of  others,  because  of  their 
 connexion  with  the  former;  or,  because  they  did 
 not  see  how  hearing  of  them,  could  either  tend 
 to  awaken  to  reformation  any  in  the  church,  or 
 to  confirm  any  in  the  secession,  which  they  took 
 to  be  the  way  of  the  Lord.  All  the  nation  be- 
 ing under  solemn  vows  tu  promote  the  covenant- 
 ed work  of  reformation,  such  as  were  contem- 
 
RISE   AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION.       51 
 
 Hers,  of  it,  or  careless  about  it,  were  by  them 
 thought  not  altog-ether  Ji'ee  of  scandal  on  that 
 head.  To  admit  to  sealing  ordinances,  such 
 whose  most  noted  scandals  they  could  have  no 
 influence  to  censure,  or  purge,  was  thought  to 
 involve  in  considerable  perplexity.  For  seced- 
 ing ministers  to  have  judged  of  their  fitness  for 
 the  seals  of  God's  covenant,  who  never  commit- 
 ted themselves  to  their  care,  but  continued  pleas- 
 ed with  their  established  pastors,  might  have  ap- 
 peared very  assuming ;  and  in  some  cases  have 
 occasioned  disputes  in  their  own  congregation. 
 From  such  views  the  seceding  ministers  were 
 much  on  the  reserve,  with  respect  to  the  admis- 
 sion of  these  who  were  not  of  their  body,  nor 
 disposed  towards  an  accession  thereto.  It  was 
 suspected  such  a  reserve  was  too  hastily  indulg- 
 ed in  the  breach  of  fellowship  with  Messrs.  John 
 Rid,  James  Wardlaw,  and  other  worthy  mini- 
 sters, or  people  of  that  stamp,  who  remained  be- 
 liind  them  in  the  established  church.  This  some 
 of  the  seceders  repented  of,  when  they  had  not 
 these,  nor  their  equals,  in  the  church,  to  hold 
 communion  with.  It  cannot,  however,  be  deni- 
 ed, that  some  of  these  worthy  ministers,  by  con- 
 necting themselves  at  sacramental,  or  other  oc- 
 casions, with  intruders,  or  their  abettors,  gave 
 too  much  provocation. 
 
 The  plain,  and  as  was  reckoned,  harsh  dealing 
 of  the  second  testimony,  with  the  crowding  of 
 the  people  after  the  seceding  ministers,  mightily 
 provoked  the  managers  in  the  established  church. 
 The  eight  brethren  were  libelled  and  cited  to  the 
 Assembly  USD.  When  they  compeared,  the  As- 
 sembly intimated  their  readiness  to  drop  the  li- 
 bel, and  every  thing  bvgone,  and  to  receive  them 
 
58  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOJNT   OF   THE 
 
 with  open  arms  into  full  ministerial  and  Christian 
 communion  with  them.  This  offer  tlie  seced- 
 ing ministers  refused  to  accept ;  and  conceiv- 
 ing that  the  court  chiefly  consisted  of  intrud- 
 ers, and  others  active  in  the  growing  defec- 
 tion, they  boldly  declined  her  authority,  as  a 
 not  right  constituted  judicature  of  Jesus  Christ. 
 Provoked  anew  with  this  daring  attack,  the  ma- 
 nagers resolved  to  resent  it  with  vigour.  "With- 
 out finding  them  erroneous  in  doctrine,  or  scan- 
 dalous in  practice,  the  next  Assembly,  1710,  de- 
 posed them  from  the  ministerial  office,  as  to  the 
 exercise  of  it  in  this  church.  The  Assembly's 
 restoration,  to  the  office  of  the  minidry,  Mr.  John 
 Glass,  an  impenitent  and  furious  independent, 
 who  had  plainly  broken  his  ordination-vows,  and 
 continued  declaiming  against  Presbyterian  go- 
 vernment, reproaching  our  national  covenanting, 
 and  setting  up  as  many  sectarian  congregations 
 as  lay  in  his  power,  attended  their  prosecution 
 against  the  seceding  ministers.  A  notour  evi- 
 dence they  were  zealous  for  themselves,  not  for 
 the  truth. 
 
 These  brethren  had  never  given  evidence  that 
 their  secession  was  made  for  the  sake  of  filthy 
 lucre.  They  did  not,  before  they  took  that  step, 
 in  the  manner  of  some  since,  secure  themselves 
 in  larger  stipends : — And  now  being  deposed,  they 
 clave  to  their  flocks,  though,  in  sundry  of  them, 
 the  hope  of  subsistence  was  for  the  present  pretty 
 inconsiderable.  The  civil  magistrate  quickly  turn- 
 ed them  out  of  their  kirks,  and  claims  to  their 
 benefice.  Their  prosecution  occasioned  the  in- 
 crease of  their  followers.  As  their  numbers  in- 
 creased, so  did  their  trials.  Some  royal  fasts  be- 
 ing indicted,  on  account  of  the  Spanish  war,  some 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION.       59 
 
 of  their  people,  in  a  particular  corner  of  the 
 country,  where  the  anti-government  opinions 
 considerably  prevailed,  solicited  them  to  deter- 
 mine judicially,  whether  it  was  lawful  for  seced- 
 ers  to  continue  observing  fasts  and  thanksgiv- 
 ings, even  on  grounds  and  causes  specified  by 
 themselves,  upon  the  days  nominated  by  the 
 King  for  such  exercises.  To  this  petition  no 
 answer  was  given,  till  a  pro  re  nata  or  interim 
 meeting  of  Presbytery,  appointed  for  consider- 
 ing a  different  affair,  and  while  fourteen  of 
 twenty-two  members  were  absent*,  Messrs.  Tho- 
 mas Nairn,  Alexander  JMoncrief,  and  Thomas 
 JMair,  irregularly  dragged  in  that  question.  When 
 it  was  carried,  I  think  by  four  votes  against 
 THREE,  that  in  regard  they  conceived  the  estab- 
 lished church-judicatures  had  surrendered  their 
 power  of  appointing  fasts  and  thanksgivings  in- 
 to the  hand  of  the  Sovereign ;  arid  that  the  So- 
 vereign had  taken  that  power  into  his  own  hands, 
 it  would  be  a  sinful  conniving  at  his  Majesty's 
 exercising  a  spiritual  headship  over  the  church, 
 for  seceders  to  observe  public  fasts  or  thanks- 
 givings on  the  diets  named  by  him,  even  on  causes 
 or  grounds  of  their  own  framing. 
 
 Three  of  the  four  who  voted  this  decision,  af- 
 terwards altered  their  opinion.     And  the  deep 
 
 *  The  members  present  at  this  Presbytery,  as  marked  in  the  original  mi- 
 nute, now  before  me,  besides  JMr.  Thomson,  Moderator,  were  .Messrs. 
 Alexander  Moncricf,  Thomas  Nairn,  Thomas  JMuir,  William  Ilutton, 
 Kbcrczcr  and  Ralph  I'^skines,  ministers,  and  JMr.  James  W^ardlaw,  from 
 Dunterndine,  rulinj^-cldcr  :  The  first  four  of  whom  voted  for  that  act,  as 
 far  as  it  disallows  Seceders  observing  fasts  by  their  own  authority,  on  days 
 appointed  by  the  supreme  civil  magistrate,  and  the  tlircc  last  voted  against  it. 
 This  meeting  was  held  at  Dunfermline,  January  H,  17  tl.  Many  of  tho 
 members  went  home  the  lirst  week,  as  is  evident  from  the  number  of  absents. 
 Mescri.  William  Wilson  was  at  Perdi  ;  Mr.  . I  anus  Fibber  was  at  Kinclca- 
 ven  ;  Mr.  James  Muir  was  at  I^inton,  and  ]Mr.  Snnlon  was  at  Kilniaurs; 
 and  the  whole  ciders  were  absent,  except  Mr.  .lames  Wardlaw — The  meet- 
 ing was^J'O  re  naUiy  and  tiicrcfore  tlic  apiwintmcnt  of  tlie  firu>t  illegal. 
 
GO      AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 silence  concerning  this  affair,  in  tlrj  covenant 
 acknowledgment  of  sins  which  they,  some  time 
 after,  drew  up,  plainly  shews  that  the  above- 
 mentioned  decision  was  far  from  being  generally 
 approven  by  the  ministers.  Numbers  of  the  peo- 
 ple, however,  in  different  corners,  once  giving 
 into  a  prejudice  in  favours  of  it,  it  was  but  in  icw 
 places  found  for  edification  to  observe  pubHc 
 fasting  or  thanksgiving  on  the  diets  nominated 
 by  the  King.  The  seceding  ministers  indeed 
 failed  not  to  recommend  private  fasting  on  such 
 occasions  ;  and  to  admonish  their  people  to  be- 
 ware of  offending  others  with  any  pul)lic  labour. 
 So  that,  excepting  a  few  of  the  forward  and  less 
 judicious,  as  little  open  offence  was  ever  given  to 
 the  government,  on  this  head,  by  the  seceders  as 
 by  them  who  professed  to  be  the  most  zealous  ob- 
 servers of  the  royal  fasts. 
 
 From  a  number  of  favourable  reports  concern- 
 ing the  English  methodists,  not  a  few  of  the  se- 
 ceders had  judged  them  laborious  reformers,  and 
 prayed  for  their  success.  By  letters,  jMr.  Ralph 
 Erskine  corresponded  with  Mv.  John  Wesley, 
 one,  if  not  their  principal  leader.  Informed  by 
 a  private  hand  of  his  unsoundness,  informed  by 
 Mr.  Whitefield,  that  he  and  his  brother  blas- 
 phemed the  doctrine  of'  election,  and  scarce  preached 
 one  principle  agreeable  to  the  gospel  of  Jesus  Christ; 
 and  finding  that  iMr.  Wesley  declined  giving  him 
 any  satisfaction,  with  respect  to  his  orthodoxy, 
 he  entirely  dropped  his  correspondence  with 
 him.  Nor  indeed  were  the  seceders  sorry  there- 
 at, when  they  afterwards  observed  how  i\Ir.  Wes- 
 ley copied  after  the  Popish  orders,  in  sending 
 forth,  or  superintending  a  number  of  lay-preach- 
 ers, labouring  in  different  nations  ; — and  had,  in 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION.       CI 
 
 the  Popish  manner,  instituted  a  confession  of 
 heart-secrets,  in  the  societies  under  his  care,  cal- 
 culated to  render  them  dissem])lers,  or  to  render 
 him  and  his  underlings  so  much  master  of  their 
 secrets,  as  should  make  it  dangerous  for  them  to 
 desert  his  cause: — when  they  heard  of  his  money- 
 rated  tickets  for  different  degrees  of  saintship ; 
 when  they  observed  what  fulsome  pride,  what 
 want  of  candour,  what  pretence  to  working  of 
 miracles ;  what  estimation  of  Popish  or  Popish- 
 like  superstition,  what  vain  and  false  character- 
 izing of  his  followers,  as  a  body  of  perfect,  or 
 almost  perfect  men;  what  extolling  of  Servetus, 
 a  most  shocking  blasphemer  of  the  blessed  Tri- 
 nity, as  a  /t'o/y  and  luise  man,  appears  in  his  pub- 
 lic performances :  when  they  observed  how  he 
 taught,  and  recommended  his  preachers  to  teach 
 in  his  societies.  That  orthodoxy,  or  soundness  of 
 opinion,  is  a  slender  part  of  religion,  if  any  part 
 at  all:  That  God  gives  every  man,  in  his  natural 
 state,  a  power  to  accept  of  an  offered  salvation  : 
 That  every  man,  in  his  baptism,  has  a  principle  of 
 grace  infused  into  him,  which  cannot  be  lost 
 but  by  a  long  course  of  sinning  :  That  the  fulfil- 
 ling of  the  broken  law,  in  its  precept  and  penalty, 
 by  Christ,  was  not  necessary  to  purchase  our  sal- 
 vation :  That  not  Christ's  satisfaction  to  law  and 
 justice,  but  faith  and  repentance,  are  the  terms 
 of  salvation  to  fallen  men:  That  men  have  reason 
 to  complain,  if  Christ  died  not  for  all,  and  if  all 
 be  not  rendered  able  to  receive  him  :  I'hat  if  (lod 
 pass  by  nine-tenths  of  mankind,  if  he  deny  any 
 soul  what  is  necessary  to  his  present  good,  or  fi- 
 nal acceptance  ;  if  he  hate  any  we  are  bound  to 
 love,  he  cannot  be  infinitely  good,  nay,  is  worse 
 than  we  are  :  That  if  God  from  eternity  chose 
 
62  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 some  to  everlasting  life,  and  purposed  to  leave 
 others  to  perish  in  their  sin,  he  is  an  almicrhtjj  fjj- 
 rant,  and  more  false,  cruel,  and  unjust,  than  the 
 DEVIL  :  That  God's  purpose  of  election  consists 
 in  his  choosing  obedient  believers,  accordin:^  to 
 the  foreknowledge  of  their  good  works;  and  our 
 obedience  to  Christ  is  the  cause  of  his  becominir 
 the  author  of  eternal  salvation  to  us:  That  no 
 man  is  particularly  elected  till  the  day  of  his  con- 
 version to  God:  That  it  is  better  to  be  a  Turk,  a 
 Deist,  an  Atheist,  than  to  believe  God  has  only 
 chosen  so?ne  men  to  everlasting  life,  and  not 
 others,  or  to  believe  that  Christ  did  not  die  equally 
 for  all  men  :  That  to  say  the  covenant  of  grace 
 v»^as  made  with  Christ,  and  its  condition  exacted 
 from,  and  fulfdled  by  him,  in  our  stead,  \s  false, 
 and  the  very  centre  of  Antinomianism  :  That  the 
 phrase  Imputed  righteousness  has  done  immense 
 hurt,  and  tempts  men  to  work  all  uncleanness 
 with  greediness ;  the  nice  metaphysical  doctrine 
 of  Christ's  imputed  righteousness  leads  men  to 
 licentiousness  ;  the  doctrine  of  the  saints  having 
 a  sinless  obedience  in  Christ  their  Head,  while 
 they  are  notorious,  that  is,  manifestly  sinners  in 
 themselves,  is  calculated  to  please  and  encourage 
 the  vilest  rakes :  That  not  the  imputed  righteous- 
 ness of  Christ,  but  our  faith,  is  our  justifying 
 righteousness  before  God  :  That  our  keeping  of 
 the  commandments  is  undoubtedly  the  way  to 
 eternal  life  ;  that  we  are  to  obey  the  law  in  or- 
 der to  our  final  acceptance  with  God  ;  our  holi- 
 ness, as  well  as  the  blood  of  Christ,  will  give  us 
 boldness  in  the  day  of  judgment,  and  will  be  the 
 ground  of  our  being  then  i)ronounced  righteous: 
 Tijat  our  salvation  is  by  works  as  a  condition  ; 
 that  we  are  rewarded  of  (lod  according  to  our 
 works,  for  the  sake  of  our  works,  and  according 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       63 
 
 to  the  merit  of  our  works:  That  Heathens,  who 
 never  heard  of  Christ,  are  accepted  of  God,  for 
 their  fearing-  God,  and  working  righteousness, 
 according-  to  the  light  they  have :  That  there  is 
 no  such  thing  as  a  state  of  justification,  or  sanc- 
 tification,  but  men  are  every  moment  accepted 
 of  God  or  not,  according  to  their  temper  or  work: 
 That  our  justification  is  incomplete  at  first,  and 
 is  perfected  by  degrees ;  that  to  be  justified  is 
 the  same  thing  as  to  be  born  of  God :  That  a 
 man  may  be  justified,  and  yet  not  have  the  Spi- 
 rit, norChrist  dwelling  in  him:  That  we  cannot 
 possess  justification  or  peace  with  God,  without 
 knowing  that  we  do  so:  That  we  cannot  be  Chris- 
 tian believers,  except  we  be  free  from  sin :  That 
 the  best  of  men  do  not  complain  of  disorder  in 
 their  affections ;  nor  that,  when  they  would  do 
 good,  evil  is  present  with  them :  That  while  our 
 heart  is  perfect  in  piety  or  love,  we  may,  in  our 
 life,  be  compassed  about  with  sinful  infirmities : 
 That  the  doctrine  of  the  unfailing  perseverance  of 
 the  saints  is  deadly  poison:  that  the  souls  of  be- 
 lievers, at  their  death,  do  not  immediately  pass 
 into  the  heavenly  glory,  but  to  a  middle  state 
 called  Paradise  :  That  church  or  state  may  im- 
 pose indifferent  ceremonies  in  God's  worship, 
 and  exclude  Christians  from  church-communion, 
 merely  because  their  conscience  cannot  comply 
 therewith.  On  these,  and  many  other  accounts, 
 the  seceders  have  hot  a  favourable  opinion  of 
 IMr.  Wesley,  nor  of  the  preachers  he  superin- 
 tends, as  it  is  feared  they  too  much  resemble 
 their  leader. 
 
 From  Mr.  George  Whitefielc^'s  own  missives  to 
 Mr.  Erskine,  and  other  reports,  sundry,  if  not  all 
 of  the  seceding  minister's  conceived  no  small  re- 
 
6h  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOtTNT  OF  THE 
 
 ^ard  for  him.  But  finding,  by  converse  with  him, 
 that  he  decried  every  particular  form  of  church- 
 f^overnment,  as  ii  mere  luiman  device;  findini;,  in 
 his  sermons  and  journals,  a  number  of  hints, 
 which  they  deemed  not  agreeable  to  the  word  of 
 God  ;  and  exceedingly  olFendcd  with  his  printed 
 account  of  God*s  dealing  with  his  soul,  wherein 
 they  thought  he  had  shown  a  strange  fondness 
 to  run  the  parallel  between  himself  and  Jesus 
 Christ;  had  represented  Poj)ish,  and  some  other 
 bad  books,  as  the  darling  directors  of  his  spiri- 
 tual exercise  ;  had  founded  his  call  to  the  mini- 
 stry upon  early  stirring  of  his  aifections,  idle  tales, 
 dreams,  or  impressions ;  had  represented  absti- 
 nence from  flesh  in  Lent,  living  on  coarse  food, 
 Avearing  of  woollen  gloves,  a  patched  gown,  and 
 dirty  shoes,  as  great 2)ro7note?'s  of  the  spiritual  life; 
 had  averred,  that  in  his  unconverted  state,  he 
 had  endeavoured  to  do  all  to  the  glory  of  God  ; 
 Avas  built  up  in  the  knowledge  and  fear  of  God ; 
 received  abundant  grace,  in  receiving  the  Lord*s 
 Supper;  and  increased  in  favour  with  God  and 
 man;  had  represented  his  conversion  as  if  begun 
 in  an  uncommon  drought  and  clamminess  in  his 
 throat,  and  which,  by  means  of  his  casting  him- 
 self dov/n  on  the  bed,  and,  in  imitation  of  Jesus 
 Christ,  crying  out,  /  tliirst,  was  removed,  and 
 succeeded  with  a  ravishing  joy,  and  rejoicing  in 
 God  his  Saviour,  by  which  his  conversion  was  fi- 
 nished ;  and  pretended  to  have  been  guided  by 
 tlie  Spirit,  and  by  watching  and  reading  the 
 Scripture  on  his  knees,  in  the  viinutest  circuin- 
 sta/ice,  as  j)lainly  as  the  Jews,  by  consulting  the 
 Urim  and  Thummim,  cVc. :  These,  and  the  like 
 things,  togetluT  with  his  letter  and  extract,  where- 
 in he  insisted  for  joining  Christians  of  all  deno- 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION.        65 
 
 minatlons,  Papists  or  Protestants,  Quakers,  Ari- 
 ans,  Arininians,  &c.  if  not  also  Jews  and  Hea- 
 thens, into  one  religious  society,  without  mind- 
 ing their  different  sentiments ;  provoked  the  se- 
 ceders  to  turn  their  regard  into  dislike,  and  warm 
 opposition. 
 
 In  1742  a  surprising  commotion,  in  the  souls 
 and  bodies  of  men,  happened  in  various  places  of 
 the  nation,  as  they  attended  upon  sermons.  This 
 many  extolled  as  a  wonderful  work  of  the  Spirit 
 of  God.  The  seceders  allowed  that  the  lives  of 
 many  were  reformed  by  it  for  the  present ;  and 
 that  truly  divine  and  converting  influence  might 
 attend  the  gospel  truths  preached  on  these  occa- 
 sions :  yet,  because  of  the  bodily  convulsions, 
 the  disorderly  noise,  the  imaginary  views  of 
 Christ  as  man,  the  dislike  to  a  covenanted  work 
 of  reformation,  and  the  proud  boasting,  which 
 they  thought  attended  it,  they  accounted  it  mostly 
 delusive.  Amidst  the  warm  contention  on  so 
 critical  a  topic,  it  is  possible  both  parties  run  in- 
 to extremes,  and  became  stumbling-blocks  one 
 to  another.  But  multitudes  of  the  su])jects  of 
 this  famed  influence  returning  to  their  v/onted 
 course,  the  seceders  were  thereby  not  a  little  con- 
 firmed in  their  own  sentiments  thereof 
 
 Meanwhile  they  had  another  trial  from  among 
 themselves.  It  was  their  earnest  prayer  to  God, 
 that  he  would  make  our  Sovereign,  Ring  George, 
 and  every  subordinate  magistrate,  hearty  friends 
 to,  and  promoters  of  a  covenanted  work  of  refor- 
 mation. They  were,  however,  firmly  persuaded, 
 that  difference  in  religion  did  not  make  void, 
 or  in  the  least  annul  their  just  power  and  autho- 
 rity. They  zealously  testified  against  such  in 
 the   land,   who   denied   their   civil   authority   iu 
 
 i 
 
66  AX   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 things  lawful.  Such  were  often  publicly  debar- 
 red from  recL'ivinf,^  the  Lord's  Supper  with  them. 
 In  the  late  rebellion,  many  of  them  voluntarily 
 bore  arms  against  the  pretender;  not  one  of  them 
 appeared  on  his  side.  Numbers  of  them  suffer- 
 ed considerable  hardships,  rather  than  do  any 
 thinp^  tending  to  the  su])port  of  his  army  or  cause. 
 Mr.  Thomas  Nairn,  however,  one  of  their  mini- 
 sters, presumed  to  assert,  that  none  but  a  cove- 
 nanted Presbyterian  could  be  the  lawful  Sovereign 
 of  this  realm.  Quickly  his  brethren  prosecuted 
 him  with  vigour,  and  expelled  him  from  their 
 society.  They  judicially  refuted  his  sentiments, 
 and  published  a  large  declaration,  wherein  they 
 shewed,  from  the  word  of  God,  our  subordinate 
 standards,  and  covenants,  that  the  whole  nation 
 ought,  for  conscience  sake,  to  obey  the  present 
 civil  government,  in  all  things  lawlul.  Nor,  in 
 respect  of  obedience  to  our  laudable  civil  laws, 
 are  they,  or  their  people,  afraid  to  risk  a  compa- 
 rison with  any  party  in  the  kingdom. 
 
 After  about  seven  years  advisement,  the  se- 
 ceding ministers  agreed  on  a  bond  for  public  co- 
 venanting with  God;  and  in  the  end  of  i^i^S 
 themselves  began  to  swear  and  subscribe  it.  Next 
 year  their  act  of  Presbytery,  relative  tliereto,  to- 
 gether with  a  judicial  vindication  of  gos])el-truth 
 from  the  injuries  done  it,  by  the  General  Assembly 
 1720  and  1722,  was  published  by  them.  Their 
 covenant-bond  had  been  abundantly  short,  and 
 mostly  plain,  had  it  not  reduplicated  upon  a  long 
 confession  of  sins,  of  Mhich  it  is  probahle  lew  of 
 their  [)eople  could  J'ui/jj  know  the  import  and  cer- 
 tainty. It  must  not  be  imagined  the  seceding 
 brethren  inserted,  into  this  confession,  such  a 
 multitude  of  historical  hints,  that  [)eople  might 
 
RISE   AND  PROGRESS  OF  TIIK   SECESSION.      07 
 
 swear  to  the  truth,  the  fact  thereof.  To  have 
 sworn  many  of  these  historical  articles  in  truth, 
 righteousness,  and  judgment,  was  absolutely  im- 
 possible: they  had  no  vouchers  for  them  but  the 
 fallible  testimony  of  men.  Besides,  to  swear  the 
 certainty  of  facts  in  an  oath  directed  to  God  as 
 the  party,  appears  a  blasphemous  attempt  to 
 certify  the  Omniscient,  and  teach  the  Almighty 
 knowledge.  It  wac  necessary,  however,  that 
 people  should  have  a  considerable  knowledge  of, 
 and  certainty  for  what  they  solemnly  confessed 
 to  God,  lest  their  confessing  work  should  partly 
 amount  to  a  hypocritical  slander.  The  {)resby- 
 tery's  act,  constituting  the  swearing  of  this  cove- 
 nant the  term  of  ministerial  and  Christian  com- 
 munion with  them,  was  not  a  little  condemned. 
 It  was  by  many  tliought  quite  unreasonable,  that 
 a  person  zealously  attached  to  divine  truth,  nay, 
 to  our  subordinate  standards  and  covenants,  and 
 of  an  eminently  holy  practice,  should  be  exclud- 
 ed from  church-fellowship  with  them,  merely  be- 
 cause he  could  not  understand  the  meaning  or 
 certainty  of  every  thing  in  this  bond  and  ac- 
 knowledgment of  sins  ;  or  would  not  confess 
 or  swear  to  God  what  he  understood  not.  Not 
 a  few  of  the  seceding  ministers  were  afterwards 
 sensible  of  the  sinfulness  of  this  act:  nor  do  I 
 know  that  ever  the  most  zealous  for  covenant- 
 ing, did,  with  respect  to  the  admission  of  their 
 peo[)le  to  sealing  ordinances,  act  up  to  the  tenor 
 of  it. 
 
 To  punish  thcScceders's  pride  of  their  success; 
 their  want  of  due  tenderness  to,  and  concern  for 
 those  who  remained  Ijehind  them  in  the  esta- 
 blished church ;  their  slightly  laying  to  heart 
 the  sms  of  the  land,  which  they  professed  to  wit- 
 
68  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 ness  a:;aliist;  and  their  sad  nce^Iect  to  do  more 
 than  others^  in  a  holy  and  exemplary  practice, 
 the  Lord  i^'ave  them  up  to  a  most  unchristian 
 contention  and  breach  amon^  themselves.  In 
 1745  their  ministers  were  so  increased  as  to  con- 
 stitute three  presbyteries  under  one  synod.  Their 
 synodical  work  commenced  with  an  inquiry  into 
 the  lawfulness  of  some  oaths,  not  imposed  by 
 Parliament,  but  used  in  the  land.  They  were 
 of  opinion  that  the  masox-oath  implied  in  it  au 
 iq-norant,  childish,  and  superstitious  profanation 
 of  the  name  of  God,  and  therefore  harmoniously 
 a«^reed  to  take  pains  to  prevent  any  of  their  peo- 
 ple having  afterward  any  hand  in  the  swearing 
 thereof. 
 
 With  respect  to  the  oath  imposed  in  some 
 burghs,  there  was  the  warmest  contention  in 
 their  synod.  The  great  point  of  debate  was, 
 whether  it  was  lawful  for  a  seceder  to  swear 
 that  clause,  I  profess  and  allow  with  m\)  heart,  the 
 tfiic  religion  pirsenili/  professed  iviiJiin  this  realm, 
 and  authorised  by  the  laius  thereof;  I  shall  abide  at, 
 and  drfnd  the  same  to  my  Uje's  end,  renouncing  the 
 Roman  religion  called  Papistry,  JMessrs.  Ebenezer 
 and  Ralph  Erskines,  James  Fisher,  and  others, 
 contended,  that  since  it  was  the  true,  the  divine 
 religion,  professed  and  authorised  in  Scotland, 
 iTSELT,  and  not  the  human  and  faulty  manner  of 
 profe^sing  and  settling  it,  that  was  sworn — the 
 words  of  the  oath  not  being,  \^  j^j'esently  profess- 
 ed and  authorised,  but  words  of  a  very  diil'erent  im- 
 })ort:  that  since,  in  their  secession,  they  had  ne- 
 ver pretended  to  set  up  a  new  religion,  but  to 
 cleave  closely  to  that,  which  they  had  before 
 professed:  That  since,  in  their  vari(jus  teaiinuj- 
 nies,  they  had   solemly  appro ven  the  doctrine, 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.      GO 
 
 worship,  discipline,  and  government  of  tlio 
 church  of  Scotland  ;  had  solemnly  declared  their 
 adherence  to  the  standards  avowed  by  the 
 established  church,  and  no  other ;  had  so  often 
 declared  their  adherence  to  the  ordination  vows, 
 which  they  had  taken  in  the  established  church, 
 whereby  the}^  were  sworn  to  that  very  religion, 
 doctrine,  worship,  discipline,  and  government, 
 professed  and  authorised  in  the  realm :  That 
 since,  though  they  had  stated  a  quarrel  with 
 the  manner  in  which  the  true  religion  is  pre- 
 sently professed  and  settled,  and  had  testi- 
 fied against  the  corruptions  of  both  church  and 
 state,  yet  they  had  been  so  far  from  stating  a 
 quarrel  with  the  true  reUglon  itself,  professed  and 
 authorised  in  the  realm,  that  they  had  but  two 
 years  before,  in  their  declaration  of  principles 
 against  Mr.  Nairn,  judicially  declared  the  reli- 
 gion presently  authorised  to  be  their  own,  so- 
 lemnly thanking  God,  that  our  religion  has 
 such  SECURITY  hij  the  V RE sii'iiT  civil  gover7Wientf 
 as  no  nation  on  earth  enjoijs  the  like;  therefore  they 
 pled,  that  the  synod  could  not,  without  the  most 
 glaring  self-contradiction,  prohibit  the  swearing 
 of  the  above  clause,  as,  in  itself ,  sinful  for  a  se- 
 ceder. — Messrs.  Alexander  Moncrief,  Thomas 
 IVIair,  Adam  Gib,  and  others,  no  less  warmly 
 contended,  that  this  oath  being  administrated 
 by  these  of  the  established  church,  and  ought  to 
 be  understood  in  the  sense  of  the  magistrates, 
 for  v.iiose  security  it  is  given  ;  and  the  true  re- 
 ligion mentioned  in  it  to  be  understood  as  re- 
 duplicating upon  every  act  of  Parliament  or 
 Assembly  inconsistent  with  the  law  of  God;  and 
 as  including  all  the  corruptions  of  both  churcli 
 and  state :  and    so   natively  inferred,  tl^.at  the 
 
70  AN  insToniCAL  account  of  the 
 
 swearing  of  the  disputed  clause  imported  a  so- 
 lemn renunciation  and  droppini^  of  the  whole  of 
 their  testimony.  They  contended,  that  the  words 
 true  religion,  j)resenthj  professed  and  authorised, 
 in  a  time  of  reformation,  would  reduplicate  only 
 upon  j;ood  acts  of  Parliament  and  Assembly  ; 
 but  in  a  time  of  deformation,  reduplicated  upon 
 all  the  bad. 
 
 iVftcr  no  small  disputing,  the  defenders  of  the 
 clause,  and  now  called  Burghers,  for  the  sake  of 
 peace,  offered  to  condescend  to  an  act  discharg- 
 ing seceders  to  swear  this  clause  of  the  oath,  as 
 inexpedient  for  them  in  the  present  circumstan- 
 ces, viz.  of  strife  and  contention  a])0ut  its  mean- 
 ing. This  proposal  the  antiburghers  rejected. 
 Nothing  would  please  them  but  an  act  declaring 
 the  ])resent  swearing  of  it  sinful  for  seceders, 
 and  inconsistent  with  their  testimony  and  cove- 
 nant-bond. In  a  meeting  of  Synod,  April  9, 
 171 6,  they  carried  a,  decision  to  their  mind.  A  num- 
 ber of  the  burgher  ministers  and  elders  protested 
 against  it ;  and  soon  after  gave  in  their  reasons, 
 im})orting,  that  it  was  sinful  in  itself,  contrary  to 
 Christian  forbearance,  tending  to  rent  the  church, 
 enacted  contrary  to  the  order  prescribed  in  the  bar- 
 rier acts,  and  carried  by  a  catch,  when  many  mem- 
 1)ers  weie  absent.  Contrary  to  order,  the  Anti- 
 burghers neglected  to  have  their  answers  to  these 
 reasons  ready  against  next  meeting  of  Synod  ; 
 and  some  of  them  having,  in  the  meanwhile,  pub- 
 licly debarred  from  the  Lord's  Table  such  as 
 maintained  the  lawfulness  of  the  burgess-oath, 
 a  (piestion  was  intruducotl,  whether  the  above  de- 
 cision, condemnatory  of  the  present  swearing  of 
 the  religious  clause  of  some  burgess-oaths,  should 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION.       71 
 
 I)e  a  term  of  ministerial  and  Christian  commu- 
 nion with  them?  Conceiving-  that  there  is  a  wide 
 difference  between  enacting  a  deed  of  Synod, 
 and  making  that  deed  a  term  of  church-couunu' 
 7iion,  the  seven  burgher  ministers  who  had  pro- 
 tested against  the  former  decision,  considered  this 
 as  a  7iew  question,  and  so  claimed  a  vote  therein. 
 After  too  much  unchristian  altercation,  at  two 
 different  meetings  of  Synod,  and  notwithstand- 
 ing of  a  dissent  and  protestation  of  the  Antibur- 
 ghers  to  the  contrary,  it  was  voted  and  carried, 
 that  the  decision  condemnatory  of  a  ])resent 
 swearing  of  tlie  religious  clause  of  some  burgher- 
 oaths  should  NOT  be  a  term  of  ministerial  and  CJiris- 
 tian  connmuiion  ivith  them,  at  least  till  the  cijfair 
 should  be  maturely  considered  in  presbyteries  and 
 sessions,  and  their  opinion  (not  decisive  judgment) 
 returned;  and  further  means  of  unanimity,  by 
 prayer  and  conference,  essayed.  No  sooner  was 
 this  sentence  carried,  than  Mr.  Thomas  Mair 
 protested,  that  hereby  the  Burghers  had  forfeit- 
 ed all  their  sy nodical  power  and  authority  ;  and 
 that  the  whole  power  of  the  Synod  devolved  up- 
 on himself  and  his  party,  and  such  as  clave  to 
 them  :  all  of  whom  he,  though  not  moderator, 
 called  to  meet  to-morrow  in  j\Ir.  Gib's  house,  in 
 a  synodical  capacity;  and  then,  with  twenty-two 
 more,  without  either  moderator  or  clerk,  with- 
 drew from  thirty-two  of  their  brethren,  consti- 
 tuted in  the  name  of  Christ,  with  their  modera- 
 tor and  clerk  among  them,  viz.  IMr.  James  j\Iair, 
 moderator;  with  Messrs.  E.  R.  II.  and  J.  I^rs- 
 kines,  J.  Fisher,  J.  Macara,  I).  Smiton.  I.  Paton, 
 ^A.  Black,  D.  Horn,  D.  Teller,  W.  Ilutton,  J. 
 Smith,  J.  Johnston,  A.  I'homson,  ministers;  T. 
 Tord,  K.  Lees,  A.  Douglass,  W.  .Manderston,  J. 
 
72  AN    HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OP  THE 
 
 Moubray,  J.  Beui^o,  R.  AVishart,  G.  Coventry, 
 D.  Millar,  R.  Patcrson,  J.  iMarshall,  S.  Harper, 
 J.  Rcder,  J.  Calendar,  W.  jMillar,  J.  Millar,  el-- 
 ders.  All  these  are  marked  in  the  minutes  as 
 present*  ;  nor  is  tiiere  the  smallest  probability 
 that  any  of  them  would  go  off,  when  such  an  im- 
 portant cpiestion  was  the  subject  of  debate. 
 
 Next  day  the  burghers  met  synodically,  ac- 
 cording to  adjournment,  in  the  ordinary  place. 
 Upon  the  foundation  of  Mr.  Mair's  declaration, 
 the  antiburghers  constituted  themselves  into  a 
 Synod  in  Mr.  Gib's  house.  Here  they  sustained 
 themselves  judges  of  their  own  answers  to  the 
 burgher's  reasons  of  protest  aljove-mentioned  ; 
 and  of  their  own  dissents  and  protests.  They 
 determined  that  the  burgher  ministers  had  for- 
 feited all  power  belonging  to  their  office ;  and 
 that  no  seceding  Presbytery  or  Session,  except 
 constituted  in  subordination  to  their  present 
 meeting,  could  be  a  lawful  court  of  Christ.  This 
 act  was  the  basis  of  their  after  meetings  of  Ses- 
 sions and  Presbyteries.  Hence  the  Antiburgh- 
 ers on  ,  south  of  Forth  deserted  their  appoint- 
 ed diet  at  Stow,  and  constituted  their  Pres- 
 bytery elsewhere.  These  on  the  north  absolutely 
 refused  their  burgher  brethren  a  seat  in  their 
 court ;  nay,  even  these  of  them,  who  had  not 
 voted  in  what  they  accounted  the  criminal  deci- 
 sion. In  the  west  they  had  no  Presbytery,  till  some 
 ministers  withdrew  from  the  Rurghers.  None 
 of  them  would  sit  in  Session  with  such  elders  as 
 refused  to  approve  the  constitution  of  b\vnod  in 
 
 •  The  orif^inal  mimifcs,  wliich  arc  a  far  better  autliority  tlian  3Ir.  Gib, 
 affirm,  that  Mr.  Henry  Krskii.c  was  chosen  to  assist  Mr.  Ilulton  as  cicik, 
 at  the  first  sederunt  of  tliat  luecluiij  i>f  synod. 
 
 3 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.     75 
 
 Mr.  Gib's  house,  and  were  for  holding  any  church- 
 fellowship  with  the  Burgher  ministers.  They 
 soon  after  began  to  seclude  from  the  sacraments, 
 such  of  their  people  as  opposed  the  division,  and 
 were  determined  to  hear  both  sides,  as  opportu- 
 nity should  permit.  These  being  thus  driven 
 away,  went  over  to  the  Burghers. 
 
 Had  the  body  of  the  Seceders  refused  to  side 
 themselves,  and   obstinately  continued  hearing 
 the  ministers  on  both  sides,   it  might  have  con- 
 tributed to  a  speedy  harmony   as   to  the  most. 
 But  it  was  otherwise  ;    and  mournful  was  the 
 stumbling,  and  the  alienation  of  heart  that  took 
 place  :   multitudes   were  perplexed  how  to  side 
 themselves  ;   and  no  doubt  many  did  it  entirely 
 by  guess  :   the  most  ignorant  of  the  dispute  were 
 generally  the  fiercest  bigots.     To  remedy  these 
 unhappy  disorders,   the  Burgher  ministers  twice 
 begged  of  their  brethren  an  extra-judicial  meet- 
 ing for  prayer  and  conference,  in  order  to  regain 
 harmony  in  the   cause  of  truth.      Unwilling  to 
 convince  their  brethren  of  the  crimes  they  had 
 laid  to  their  charge,  or  conscious  of  the  want  of 
 sufficient  arguments  for  that  purpose,  or  from 
 some  other  motive,  the  Antiburghers  returned  no 
 other  answer,  but  that  they  could  not,  in  con- 
 sistence with  their  testimony,  comply  with  any 
 such  proposal ;    and  that  their  brethren's  only 
 method  of  peace  was  to  appear  penitent  pannels 
 at  their  bar.     To  this  they  were,  with  all  expe- 
 dition, libelled  and  cited.    None  of  them  api)ear- 
 ed  except  Mr.  William  Hutton.     He  did  it,  not 
 to  answer  his  libel,  but  to  make  a  bold  attack 
 upon  the  constitution  of  their  Synod,   as  schis- 
 matical,  and  contrary  to  Presbyterian  parity;— 
 as  founded  on  the  overthrow  of  the  office  of  el- 
 
74«  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 ders,  and  the  unnatural  murder  of  their  bre- 
 thren's sacred  office,  &:c.  A  speedy  excommuni- 
 cation was  his  reward,  and  the  most  noted  reply 
 Jie  ever  received  to  his  speecli.  This  constitu- 
 tion of  synod,  the  rest  of  the  Burgher  brethren 
 judicially  declared  null  and  void,  contrary  to  scrip- 
 ture and  reason.  INIeanwhile  the  Antiburghers, 
 to  support  their  cause,  prosecuted  their  Burgher 
 brethren  with  deposition  and  excommunication, 
 till  they  had  delivered  them  over  into  the  hand 
 of  Satan,  and  cast  them  out  of  the  church,  as 
 Heathen  men  and  publicans.  After  employing 
 themselves,  about  two  years,  in  this  censuring 
 work,  they  were  obliged  to  acknowledge.  That 
 themselves  had  all  along  been  lying  under  the 
 scandal  of  partaking  with  the  Burghers  in  sundry 
 of  their  censured  crimes  :  from  this  scandal  they, 
 at  a  meeting  of  synod,  purged  one  another,  by 
 judicial  rebukes  and  admonitions.  How  scanda- 
 lous persons  were  fit  to  censure  others,  or  to 
 purge  one  another,  was,  at  least  by  the  Burghers, 
 not  well  understood.  By  no  small  prayer  and 
 fasting,  the  Antiburghers  implored  the  blessing 
 of  Heaven  upon  their  excommunications.  But 
 God  appeared  to  refuse  binding  in  heaven,  what 
 they  had  bound  on  earth.  I'he  censures  seem- 
 ed to  have  no  other  effect,  than  to  constitute  the 
 objects,  a  kind  of  bugbears,  to  the  Antiburgher 
 people.  Whatever  abhorrence  they  endured  from 
 their  brethren,  the  Burgher  ministers,  as  helped 
 of  God,  held  their  judicatures,  and  exercised  their 
 ministry  as  before.  The  Messrs.  Erskines,  and 
 others,  lived  as  holily,  preached  as  edifyingly, 
 and  died  full  as  comfortably,  as  their  excomnui- 
 nicators.  Nor  did  it  esca])e  unobserved,  that 
 Mr.  Thomas  IMair,  who  founded  the  excommu- 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.      75 
 
 nicatin^  court,  was,  not  many  years  after,  oblig- 
 ed by  his  conscience,  publicly  to  declare,  he  had 
 been  verily  guilty  concerning  his  Burgher  bre- 
 thren's jjlood  ;  and  was  himself  ejected  by  his 
 Antiburgher  brethren,  as  an  erroneous  person, 
 for  maintaining  that  Christ,  in  some  sense,  died 
 for  all  mankind. 
 
 Nothing   since  transacted   on   either  side,   is 
 much  worthy  of  our  notice.     Permit  me  only  to 
 essay  an  impartial  account  of  the  present  agree- 
 ment and  difierence  of  the  two  parties.  The  con- 
 gregations belonging  to  both  are  about  two  hun- 
 dred, or  more :  in  some  of  these  are  thousands 
 of  members  ;  but  the  greater  part  fall  much  be- 
 low that  account.     AVliich  party  have  the  great- 
 est number  of  followers,  I  know  not ;  but  their 
 teachers  of  philosophy  and  divinity,  at  their  rup- 
 ture, happening  to  be  on  the  Antiburger  side,  al- 
 most all  the  then  students  went  along  with  their 
 masters;  and  to  this  day,  that  party  has  the  great- 
 est number  of  ministers,  though  even  here  the 
 Burghers  seem  to   gain    ground.       Since   1747, 
 both  have  had  their  respective  Synods,  Presby- 
 teries, and  Sessions  :   both  have  supplied  the  mal- 
 contents, in  their  opponents'  congregations,  with 
 sermon  :  both  constantly  avow  their  adherence 
 to  the  Scriptures,  as  the  only  rule  of  faith  and 
 practice:  both  avow  their  adherence  to  the  West- 
 minster Confession  of  Faith,  Catechisms  Larger 
 and  Shorter,  and  to  the  Directory  for  Worship 
 and    form   of   Presbyterian    church-government 
 thereto  subjoined,  and  to  the  National  Covenant 
 of  Scotland,  and  Solemn    League  of  the  three 
 kingdoms.      And  they  believe  few  decry  Con- 
 iessions  of  Faith  for  subordinate  standards,  but 
 in  order  to  vent   some  erroneous  dream.     With 
 
76  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 Ijotli,  I  hope,  the  ^^ospel  is  preached  in  purity, 
 and  endeavours  used  to  commit  the  ministry  only 
 to  serious  and  faithful  nwn.  With  both,  mini- 
 sters deliver  three  public  discourses  on  Sabbath, 
 through  the  most,  and  not  a  few  through  the 
 whole  of  the  year.  With  both,  I  hope,  ministers 
 endeavour  publicly  to  catechize,  and  privately  to 
 visit  their  congregations,  at  least  once  a  year, 
 without  respect  of  persons.  With  both,  the  pri- 
 vate administration  of  baptism  is  detested,  and 
 shunned  as  an  abjured  relic  of  Popery.  With 
 both,    ministers    dispense     the    Lord's   Supper 
 
 once,    and  sundry  of    them  twice,  a  year. 
 
 Neither  party  allow  themselves  in  admitting  to 
 the  sacraments,  such  as  have  no  visible  appear- 
 ance of  saintship,  nor  without  examination  into 
 both  their  knowledge  and  character : — and  gross 
 ignorance  of  the  Christian  faith  ;  neglect  of  se- 
 cret and  family  worship ;  cursing  or  swearing  in 
 ordinary  conversation,  or  even  in  passion  ;  play- 
 ing at  cards  or  dice ;  idleness,  or  unnecessary  la- 
 bour or  travel  on  the  Lord's  day  ;  apparent  ha- 
 tred of  others,  or  notour  neglect  of  relative  du- 
 ties to  them,  or  squabbling  with  them;  drunken- 
 ness;  promiscuous  dancing;  obscene  language, 
 or  other  apparent  approaches  to  uncleanness ; 
 clandestine  marriage*,  fornication,  dishonesty, 
 smuggling,  lying,  reviling,  and  the  like,  are, 
 with  both,  accounted  scandals,  sufficient  to  ex- 
 clude one  from  the  sacraments,  till  he,  in  a  pro- 
 per manner,  profess  his  sorrow  for  his  offence, 
 and  resolution  to  guard  against  the  like  for  the 
 future.  Their  discipline  is  much  the  same  with 
 what  was  once  universally  practised  in  the  church 
 of  Scotland,  but  now  almost  generally  disused. 
 
 ♦  Sec  above,  p.  jO—  53 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       77 
 
 Hence  sundry  of  the  less  conscientious  Seceders, 
 falling  into  scandal,  return  to  the  established 
 church,  that  they  may  altog-ethor  avoid,  or  only 
 receive  a  very  slight  censure. 
 
 From  a  view  of  their  agreement  in  so  many 
 points,  impartial  beholders  can  hardly  fail  to 
 think  that,  would  both  parties,  with  due  earnest- 
 ness, search  out  their  own  evils,  and  be  affected 
 therewith  ;  would  they  seriously  consider  what 
 hurt  their  division,  and  vain  jangling  have  done, 
 and  are  like  to  do  to  the  honour  of  Christ,  the 
 life  of  religion,  and  the  souls  of  men,  and  how 
 they  will  answer  at  his  tribunal  for  their  concern 
 and  hand  therein ;  would  they  soberly  consider 
 what  Christ  has  done  and  doth  to  promote  peace, 
 and  what  he  requires  them  to  do ;  would  both 
 entirely  lay  aside  their  pride  and  prejudice,  and 
 often  meet  for  mutual  prayer,  and  Christian  con- 
 ference, especially  on  what  they  agree  in,  they 
 would  certainly,  ere  it  was  long,  consign  their 
 censuring,  division,  and  dry,  or  almost  unintel- 
 ligible disputes,  to  everlasting  oblivion  ;  and  re- 
 turn, as  brethren,  to  join  together,  in  the  fear  and 
 service  of  God. 
 
 But,  through  mistake  and  prejudice,  their  dif- 
 ferences at  present,  seem,  at  least  to  themselves, 
 not  iuconsiderable.  The  Antiburghers  still  con 
 tinue  upon  their  quarrelled  constitution  of  Sy- 
 nod in  Mr.  Gib's  hou^e,  wherein  about  two-fifths 
 of  the  Synod  met  by  themselves,  and  assumed 
 the  whole  power  of  it  :  they  continue  approving 
 and  praying  for  a  blessing  on  the  excommunica- 
 tion, and  other  censure,  which  they,  while  con- 
 fessedly under  scandal  themselves,  passed  on  their 
 brethren,  who  never  once  acknowledged  the  au- 
 thority of  their  separate  courts.     They   contend 
 
 7 
 
78  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 that  the  constitution  of  the  revolution-church 
 was  Erastian,  founded  on  the  will  of  the  civil 
 magistrate  and  inclinations  of  the  people,  and 
 therefore  can  never  lawfully  be  joined  with. 
 They  contend  that  their  own  religion  is  different 
 from  that  professed  in  the  established  church, 
 and  authorized  by  the  laws  of  this  realm  ;  but, 
 though  repeatedly  called,  have  not  hitherto  mar- 
 ked out  one  divine  truth  professed  by  them,  which 
 is  not  contained  in  the  publicly  acknowledged 
 standards  of  religion  in  the  nation.  They  pro- 
 fess a  very  high  veneration  for  their  second  tes- 
 timony, as  if  it  were  one,  if  not  a  principal,  stand- 
 ard ;  and  they  reckon  it  no  small  crime  to  find 
 fault,  even  with  an  historical  expression  thereof; 
 but  they  renounce  their  ordination-vows,  the  first 
 testimony,  and  the  representations  expressly  ad- 
 hered to  in  it,  ifi  so  fa?'  as  these  approve  the  con- 
 stitution of  the  revolution-church,  and  the  reli- 
 gion presently  professed  therein.  At  licence,  and 
 at  ordination,  their  candidates  solemnly  avow 
 their  approbation  of  the  Associate  Presbytery's 
 declaration  of  principles  against  Mr.  Nairn,  (in 
 p.  50.  of  which  they  thank  God  that  the  scced- 
 ers'  own  religion  has  such  skcuhitv  b^  the  present 
 civil  govermnenty  as  no  nation  on  earth  enjoij  the 
 like;)  and  also  declare,  that  they  believe  it  sin- 
 ful, inconsistent  with  their  testimony,  and  bond, 
 for  any  seceder  to  swear  to  the  true  religion  pre- 
 sently professed  and  authorised  in  the  realm.  At 
 least  an  indirect  acknowledgment  of  the  sinful- 
 ness of  seceders'  s\vearing  the  above-mentioned 
 religiousclause  of  some  burgcss-oaths  isnecessarv, 
 in  order  to  a  person's  admission  to  sealing  ordi- 
 nances with  them.  They  require  a  djrect,  or  indi* 
 rcct  aj)probation  of  their  conduct,  in  separating 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       79 
 
 from,  deposing,  and  excommunicating  their  bre 
 thren,  for  believing  and  affirming,  that  the  true  re- 
 ligion presently  professed  and  authorised  in  Scot- 
 land, was  the  same  with  that  of  the  seceders,  and 
 so  safely  sworn  to  by  them  ;  or,  for  insisting  that 
 such  as  were  of  that  mind  should  not  be  exclud- 
 ed from  the  ministry,  or  seals  of  God's  covenant. 
 Public  covenanting  they  reckon  avery  distinguish- 
 ed point  of  religion,  and  with  great  zeal  instigate 
 their  people  thereto;  and  represent  the  burghers 
 as  very  wicked  for  not  doing  the  same :  it  is 
 shrewdly  alleged,  however,  that  these  covenant- 
 ers are  generally  far  from  being  sufficiently  in- 
 structed and  tried  at  their  admission,  and  that 
 very  many  of  them  understand  very  little  of  their 
 covenant-bond,  or  acknowledgment  of  sins  ;  and 
 so  are  nothing  bettered  in  practice,  but  only  be- 
 come more  remarkable  in  their  conceit  of  their 
 own  covenanting,  and  a  firm  attachment  to  their 
 party. 
 
 The  Burghers  having  been  the  majority  at  the 
 instant  of  the  rupture,  and  keeping  possession  of 
 the  place  and  power  of  the  Synod,  continue  still 
 upon  that  footing:  their  brethrens'  withdrawment 
 and  constitution  in  IMr.  Gib's  house,  they  still 
 account  most  unreasonable  and  absurd.  Their 
 above-mentioned  deposition  and  delivery  of  them 
 to  Satan,  with  their  fasting  and  prayer  for  the 
 divine  ratification  thereof,  they  account  a  most 
 fearful  profanation  of  the  name  and  ordinance  of 
 Christ.  But  they  never  attempted  to  censure 
 their  brethren,  as  they  saw  no  warrant  from 
 Scripture  to  do  so,  while  it  was  morally  certain 
 it  would  not  tend  to  general  ediiication.  Had 
 they  any  glimmering  hope  of  success,  they  would 
 even  again  supplicate  their  meeting  with  them. 
 
so  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 for  prayer  and  conference,  in  order  to  promote 
 the  healin;,^  of  tiKi  torn  body  of  Christ.  How- 
 ever far  they  allow  tlie  glory  of  the  covenanting 
 period  between  1683  and  1650,  to  exceed  that 
 after  1689,  tlioy  believe  the  constitution  of  the  re- 
 volution-church to  have  been  not  Erastian,  but 
 scriptural,  and  therefore  lawfully  joined  with. 
 And  they  intend  to  unite  with  the  established 
 judicatures,  whenever  they  observe  them  ear- 
 nestly reforming  from  the  various  and  growing 
 defections,  introduced  since  the  revolution.  The 
 covenants,  and  good  acts  of  church  or  state,  se- 
 curing and  establishing  our  standards,  and  what 
 is  contained  therein,  they  reckon  no  articles  of 
 the  true  religion,  professed  and  settled,  but  only 
 human  appearances,  in  favours  thereof:  and  in 
 this  view  they  maintain  the  religion  professed  m 
 the  revolution  church,  to  have  been  the  very 
 same  with  that  professed  betwixt  1 638  and  1 650, 
 though  the  human  manner  of  professing  and  set- 
 tling it,  by  sinful  and  fallible  men,  was  in  some 
 respects  different.  Since  their  standards  of  re- 
 ligion in  doctrine,  worship,  discipline,  and  go- 
 vernment, are  the  very  same  with  these  publicly 
 espoused  in  the  established  church,  they  gene- 
 rally think  their  religion  is  also  the  same  with 
 that  of  their  brethren  in  the  church  ;  but  they 
 esteem  their  own  manner  of  profession  and  adhe- 
 rence to  it,  to  be  more  strict,  and  so  think  they 
 ou":ht  to  have  the  countenance  of  the  civil  rulers, 
 rather  than  such  who,  contrary  to  solemn  vows, 
 practically  tread  the  established  standards  under 
 their  feet.  Their  second  testimony  they  reckon 
 no  standard,  but  a  judicial  declaration  in  favours 
 of  the  public  standards  of  the  nation,  and  the 
 truths  therein  contained.     In  its  historical  part. 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.      SI 
 
 they  grant  a  few  ill-guarded  expressions,  and  mis- 
 takes as  to  fact :  its  assertory  part  they  profess 
 to  cleave  to  without  reserve. 
 
 Persuaded  that  Christians,  equally  candid  and 
 single  in  their  aims,  and  equally  zealous  for  the 
 truth  and  honour  of  God,  may  have  different 
 views  of  the  disputed  clause  in  the  burgess-oath, 
 or  of  other  human,  nay,  many  divine  expressions, 
 they  abhor  making  either  the   approbation  or 
 condemnation  of  that  clause  a  direct  or  indirect 
 term  of  church-fellowship  with  them  :  him  that  is 
 wcak\  or  different  from  them  in  hisjailh,  about  this 
 point,  they  cheerfully  admit  even  to  the  ministry; 
 hutnot  to  douhffuldispittations.  Public  covenanting, 
 when  seasonable,  done  by  persons  only  who  liave 
 Jcnou'Iedge  and  understanding,  and  in  truth,  judg- 
 ment, and  inghtcousness,   they  heartily   approve. 
 The  continued  obligation  of  their  ancestors'    o- 
 venants  they  boldly  maintain.  At  ordinations,  and 
 other  occasions,  they  solemnly  declare  their  adhe- 
 rence thereto.  But,  finding  from  Scripture,  that  it 
 is  not  a  standing,  but  occasional  duty  of  religion, 
 never,  as  appears,  promoted  by  godly  David  nor  So- 
 lomon, during  the  eighty  years  of  their  reign;  nor 
 recommended  as  a  then  present  duty  by  Christ 
 or  his  apostles,  during  the  more  than  forty  years 
 of  their  ministrations  ;  knowing  that  it  is  better 
 not  to  vow,  than  to  do  it  ignorantly,  or  without 
 paying  of  vows,  by  a  distinguished  holy  conver- 
 sation ;   fearing  the  present  broken  and  divided 
 state  of  the  godly,  and  of  so  remarkable  restraint 
 of  spiritual  influences,  may  not  be  altogether  pro- 
 per for  it :  Finding,  that  besides  some  few  in- 
 advertent expressions,  the  confession  of  sins  pub- 
 lished in  M'^h,  and  now  useil  by  their  Antibur- 
 ghcr  brethren,  is  such  as  they  could  scarce  hope 
 / 
 
82  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT,  kc. 
 
 to  make  the  twentieth  part  of  their  hearers  un- 
 derstand ;  and  cxceedinf^ly  stuml)!cd  at  the 
 manner  in  which  this  work  is  managed  hy  their 
 brethren,  they  have  hitherto  been  afraid  to 
 proceed  therein. 
 
BRIEF  CHARACTER,   OR  VIEW  OF  SECEDERS, 
 
 DRAWN  FROM 
 
 The  principal  Decisions  of  their  Supreme  Judicatures. 
 
 Xt  is  necessarily  incumbent  upon   all  those  who  profess  to 
 follow  the  Lord  Jesus  Christ,  in  an  evil  day, 
 
 1.  Firmly  to  believe,  earnestly  maintain,  and  openly,  in 
 their  profession  and  practice,  bear  witness  for  the  truths  of 
 God  revealed  in  his  word  ;  particularly  such  of  them  as  are  in 
 danger  of  being  murdered  by  opposition,  poisoned  by  mix- 
 tures of  error,  or  buried  in  careless  oblivion,  Prov.  xxiii.  23. 
 Psal.  Ixxviii.  3 — 8.  Deut.  iv.  9.  and  vi.  6 — 9.  Isa.  xxvi.  2,  and 
 xxxviii.  19.  and  lix.  13,  14.,  15.  Phil.  iii.  l6.  and  i.  27.  2  Thess. 
 ii.  15.  1  Tim.  vi.  20.  2  Tim.  1,  13.  and  ii.  2.  and  iv.  7.  Heb. 
 ii.  1.  2  John  4.  3  John  3,  4.  Jude  3.  Rev.  ii.  13,  25.  and  iii. 
 3,  10.  ^  Pet.  i.  12. 
 
 2.  Thankfully  to  commemorate,  and  dutifully  improve, 
 the  singular  favours  which  God  hath  bestowed  upon  their 
 church  or  nation  ;  particularly,  those  by  which  he  hath  put 
 or  kept  them  in  the  possession  of  his  oracles,  ordinances,  and 
 eternal  salvation,  Psal.  Ixxviii.  1 — S.  and  cv.  cvii.  cxlv.  and 
 cvi.  1 — 5.  13.  Isa.  Ixiii.  7-  Deut.  xxvi.  1 — 9.  1  Chron.  xvi. 
 
 3.  Mournfully  to  search  out,  confess,  bewail,  avoid,  and 
 practically  testify  against  those  steps  ofapostacy  from  once  at- 
 tained reformation,  by  which  the  truths  of  God  Iiave  been  in- 
 jured, or  his  singular  favours  abused.  Lev.  xxvi,  40.  2  Chron. 
 XXX.  2i2.  Ezek.  ix.  4,  6.  and  xvi.  xx.  xxii.  xxiii.  2  Kings  xvii. 
 7 — 23.  Psal.  Ixxviii.  cvi.  Isa.  i.  ii.  v.  xxviii.  lix.  Jer.  ii — xviii  ; 
 with  Exod.  XX.  5.  Matth.  xxiii.  35.  Eph.  v.  7,  11.  1  Tim.  v.  22. 
 
 Answerably  hereto,  they  profess  an  hearty  adherence  to  the 
 Old  and  New  Testament,  as  the  only  divine  and  inJaij'ihle  rule 
 of  faith  and  practice,  2  Tim.  iii.  14 — 17-  Rev.  xxii.  18,  I9. 
 and  to  the  Westminster  Confession  of  Faith,  Catechisms,  and 
 Form  of  J'rcsbyterian  church-government,  as  founded  on  the 
 
84i  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 word  of  God,  2  Tim.  i.  13.  and  to  the  National  Covenant  of 
 Scotland,  and  the  Solemn  League  of  Scotland,  England,  and 
 Ireland,  us  religious  row.s\  whereby  they  are  solemnly  engaged 
 to  the  belief  and  practice  of  whatever  is  authorised  by  the 
 word  of  God,  and  is  therefrom  deduced  into  said  Confession 
 of  Faith,  Catechisms,  Directory  for  worship,  and  Form  of 
 church-goveiiimcnl,  I'sal.  Ixxviii.  10.  and  cxix.  100".  Prov.  xx. 
 25.  Dent.  xxix.  1—2.0.  and  xxxi.  20.  Jer.  1.  5— y. 
 
 As  they  consider  themselves  bound  to  contend  earnestly  for 
 the  faith  once  delivered  to  the  saints  ;  to  keep  the  word  of 
 Christ's  patience,  and  be  established  in  the  present  truth,  Jude 
 3.  Rev.  iii.  10.  2  Pet.  i.  12.  Eph.  iv.  14.  Prov.  xxiii.  23.  they, 
 in  opposition  to  the  errors  presently  rampant  in  the  land,  par- 
 ticularly maintain. 
 
 1.  That  Jesus  Christ  is  the  supreme  and  only  true  God,  of 
 the  same  substance  and  dignity  with  his  eternal  Father,  Rom. 
 ix.  5.  Tit.i).  13.  John  x.  ^0.  Phil.  ii.  6. 
 
 2.  That  God,  from  all  eternity,  decreed  whatsoever  comes 
 to  pass.  Acts  XV.  18.  Eph.  i.  11. 
 
 3.  That  God,  of  his  mere  good  pleasure,  without  any  re- 
 gard to  their  future  piety,  as  the  moving  cause,  from  all  eter- 
 nity elected  a  certain,  but  the  smallest,  number  of  mankind, 
 to  everlasting  life.  Eph.  i.  3 — 6.   Matth,  xx.  \6.  Luke  xii.  32. 
 
 4.  That  God  entered  into  a  covenant  with  Adam,  as  the  re- 
 presentative of  all  his  natural  posterity;  in  which  he  promised 
 him  and  them  life  temporal,  spiritual,  and  eternal,  upon  con- 
 dition of  his  perfect  obedience;  and  denounced  the  contrary 
 death,  in  case  of  the  smallest  disobedience,  Gal.  iii.  12.  Matth. 
 xix.  17.  Gal.  iv.  24.  Hos.  vi.  7. 
 
 5.  That  through  his  breach  of  that  covenant,  in  his  eating  of 
 the  forbidden  fiuit,  all  men  arc  conceivetl  and  born  in  sin, 
 able  to  do  nothing  spiritually  good,  but  are  children  of  disobe- 
 dience and  wrath,  Rom.  v.  12 — 20.  and  viii.  3,  7,  8.  Eph.  ii. 
 1,  2,  3,  8. 
 
 6.  That  no  light  of  nature,  but  the  scripture  alone,  is  suf- 
 ficient to  conduct  fallen  men  to  true  and  everlasting  happiness. 
 Acts  xiv.  1.0,  l6.  and  xvii.  30.  Prov.  xxix.  18.  Eph.  ii.  12. 
 2  John  9.  Col.  i.  26,  27,   1  Cor.  i.  20—24. 
 
 7.  That  in  order  to  redeem  men  from  an  everlasting  stale 
 of  sin  and  mi.sery,  and  bring  them  to  everlasting  salvation, 
 Christ,  the  only  begotten  Son  of  God,  assumed  our  nature, 
 and  for  ever  continues  to  be  true  God  and  true  man,  in  two 
 distinct  natures,  and  one  person,  Ilcb.  ii.  8 — It).  Rom.  viii.  3. 
 Psal.  ii.  G — 11.  Isa.  vii.  14.  and  ix.  ti.  Rom.  ix.  5.  and  i.  3,  4» 
 
RISE  AND  PHOGRESS  OF  THE   SECESSION.      85 
 
 8.  That  he,  as  our  surety,  in  the  covenant  of  grace;,  from  all 
 ^eternity,  undertook  for  all  the  elect,  and  them  only,  and  in  the 
 fulness  of  time  performed  to  the  broken  law,  and  oHcnded  justice 
 of  God,  whatever  obedience  end  satisfaction  couM  have  been 
 required  of  us,  Jer.  xxx.  21.  Psal.  xl.  6 — 8,   Isa.  liii.  and  xlii. 
 
 21.  Rom.  V.  15 — 21.  and  viii.  3,  4.  2  Cor.  v.  21.  Gal.  iv.  4, 
 5.  and  iii.  15.  Heb.  x.  10 — 14.   1  Pet.  ii.  24.  and  iii.  18. 
 
 9.  That  his  surety-righteousness,  imputed  to  us  by  God, 
 and  not  any  thing  wrought  in,  or  done  by  us,  is  the  founda- 
 tion of  our  pardon  of  sin,  acceptance  with  God,  and  title  to 
 eternal  life,  Rom.  v.  15 — 21.  Phil.  iii.  9.  Tsa.  Ixiv.  6.  and  xlv. 
 24,  25.  and  Ixi.  10.  and  liii.  5^,  11.  and  liv.  17.  Jcr.  xxiii,  6. 
 Dan.  ix.  24. 
 
 10.  That  though  God  hath  not  fixed  any  necessary  and  in- 
 fallible connection  between  tlie  natural  endeavours  of  unrcge- 
 nerate  men,  and  his  bestowing  of  saving  grace  upon  them,  yet 
 it  is  their  indispensable  duty,  carefully  to  attend  the  ordinan- 
 ces of  the  gospel,  as  means  appointed  of  God,  for  the  effectual 
 conveyance  of  his  Spirit  and  grace,  Psal.  xxxiv.  11.  Prov.  viii. 
 34.  Acts  viii.  32.  Isa.  Iv.  3.  Matth.  vii.  13,  14.  Luke 
 xiii.  24. 
 
 11.  That  though  Jesus  Christ  laid  down  his  life  for  the  elect 
 only,  yet,  in  the  gospel,  he,  and  his  complete  righteousness, 
 and  everlasting  salvation,  are  freely  offered  to  all  sinful  men 
 who  hear  it,  so  as  each  may  warrantably  receive  him,  his 
 righteousness  and  salvation,  to  himself  in  particular,  Prov.  i. 
 
 22,  23,  2i.   and  viii.  4.  and  ix.  4.  5.    Isa.  Iv.  1 — 7-  and  xlvi. 
 12,  13.  and  xlv.  22.  John  vi.  37-  Matth.  xi.  28.  Rev.  xxii.  17. 
 
 12.  That  in  consequence  hereof,  there  is,  in  the  very  na- 
 ture of  faith,  a  real  appropriation  of  Christ,  his  righteousness 
 and  salvation,  as  in  the  gospel  freely  given  of  God  to  one's 
 self  in  particular,  John  xx.  28.  Jer.  xxiii.  6.  Isa.  xlv.  24,  25, 
 Zech.  xiii  9-  Acts  xv.  11.  Gal.  ii.  I6,  20.  1  Cor.  i.  ^0. 
 2  Cor.  v.  21. 
 
 13.  That  all  believers,  through  their  union  to  Christ,  as  the 
 Lord  their  righteousness,  who  fulfilled  the  moral  law  as  a  co- 
 venant for  them,  are  fully  and  irrevocably  delivered  from  the 
 law,  in  that  covenant  form,  so  as  they  can  neither  be  justified 
 or  condemned,  on  account  of  their  own  works;  yet  they  are 
 lor  ever  under  that  law  as  a  binding  rule  of  life,  established  by 
 Jehov.mi  their  Creator  and  Redeemer,  Rom.  vi.  and  vii.  4. 
 Gal.  ii.  19.  and  iii.  13.  and  iv.  4,  5.  1  Cor.  ix.  21.  Luke  i.  7  I, 
 75.  Tit.  ii.  II,  12,  IJ. 
 
S6  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 14.  That  there  can  be  no  true  turning  from  sin,  before 
 coming  to,  and  uniting  with  Christ;  nor  ought  we  to  attempt 
 it,  in  order  to  pave  our  way,  or  to  recommend  ourselves  to  him  ; 
 but  as  utterly  ignorant,  guilty,  polluted,  weak,  and  enslaved 
 in  ourselves,  we  ought  to  receive  him  as  made  of  God  to  us 
 wisdom,  righteousness,  sanctification,  and  redemption,  that  he 
 may  save  and  turn  us  from  our  sins,  John  xv.  5.  Horn.  viii. 
 7,  8.  Matth.  i.  '21.  and  xviii.  1 1.  Uom.  xi.  '26.  Acts  v.  31.  Jer. 
 xxxi.  18,  19,  20. 
 
 15.  That  the  gospel,  properly  taken,  is  no  new  law,  requir- 
 ing of  men  faith,  repentance,  and  sincere  obedience,  as  the 
 proper  conditions  of  their  salvation  ;  but  is  God's  infinitely 
 gracious  declaration,  in  which  he  manifests,  gives,  and  offers  to 
 us,  as  sinful  men,  Christ,  his  righteousness  and  salvation,  free- 
 ly, without  money,  and  without  price,  Luke  ii.  10,  11.  Isa. 
 xlii.  1—7.  and  Ixi.  1,  2,  3.  and  Iv.  1—7.  1  Tim.  i.  15.  Rev. 
 xxii.  17.  John  vLi.  37,  38. 
 
 i6.  That  gospel-holiness  is  at  once,  a  distinguished  privi* 
 lege,  a  principal  part  of  salvation,  and  an  indispensable  duty, 
 and  necessary  preparation  for  celestial  happmess;  but  is  not 
 a  proper  condition  of  our  title  to,  or  possession  of  it,  1  Thess, 
 V.  23.  1  Cor.  i.  30.  1  Pet.  i.  15,  If).  Heb.  xii.  14.  1  Cor.  xv. 
 58.  Phil.  iii.  9.  Tit.  iii.  5—8.  Rom.  xi.  G.  and  v.  21.  and 
 vi.  23. 
 
 17.  That  believers  being  perfectly  freed  from  the  law,  as  a 
 covenant  of  works,  no  slavish  fears  of  falling  into  hell  by  their 
 daily  sins,  or  hopes  of  procuring  heaven  by  their  good  works, 
 ought  to  influence  their  obedience,  but  they  ought  always  to 
 act  as  united  to  Christ,  and  interested  in  his  everlasting  righte- 
 ousness and  salvation,  Rom.  v.  15 — 21.  with  chap.  vi.  and  vii. 
 4.  Tit.  ii.  J 1  —  14.  Psal.  cxvi.  iG.  and  cxix.  32.    1  John  iv.  I9. 
 
 18.  That  God  needs  nothing  from,  nor  can  be  profited  by, 
 any  creature ;  and  so  can  only  reward  their  good  works  of  his 
 own  free  will  and  bounty,  Job  xxii.  2,  3.  and  xxxv.  7.  Luke 
 xvii.  10. 
 
 19.  That  not  self-love,  interest,  or  pleasure,  but  the  law  of 
 God  is  the  sole  standard  by  which  the  goodness  of  actions,  re- 
 ligious and  moral,  is  to  be  estimated  and  adjusted  ;  and  not 
 self-love,  but  proper  views  of  the  excellencies  of  God  as  our 
 God  in  Christ,  and  a  regard  to  his  authority,  ought  to  be  the 
 leatling  motives  of  our  obedience  to  him,  Matth.  xvi.  24.  Deut. 
 xii.  .S2.  Exod.  XX    2 — I?.   Tit.  ii.   11  — 14. 
 
 20.  That  believers  can  never  cither  totally  or  finally  fall 
 from  their  state  of  grace,  or  hold  Jesus  Christ  for  a  downright 
 
 I 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       87 
 
 impostor,  Jer.  xxxii.  SO,  40.  Job  xvii.  9.   Prov.  iv.  18.  1  Pel. 
 i.  5.  John  iv.  14.  and  vi.  40.  54.  and  x.  28,  29.  and  xiv.  I9. 
 
 21.  That  Jesus  Christ  alone  is  the  King  and  head  of 
 his  church,  having  power  to  appoint  her  laws,  ordinances,  and 
 offices;  and  to  whom  only  her  officers  are  subject  in  all  their 
 spiritual  ministrations,  Psal.  ii.  7.  Isa.  ix.  6,  7-  Ezck.  xxiv. 
 23.  Matth.  xvi.  18,  19-  and  xxiii.  8— 10.  and  xxviii.  18—20. 
 Heb.  xiii.  17.  1  Pet.  v.  2—4. 
 
 22.  That  Christ,  in  the  New  Testament,  hath  prescribed  a 
 particular  form  of  church-government,  distinct  from,  and  inde- 
 pendent on  the  civil  magistracy  ;  which  is  the  Presbyterian, 
 and  no  other — to  continue  unalterable,  till  the  end  of  the  world, 
 John  xviii.  36.  Mattli.  xvi.  18,  I9.  and  xviii.  15 — 20.  and  xx. 
 25 — 27.  and  xxvi.  26 — 29.  and  xxviii.  18,  19.  iO.  John  xx. 
 21,  22,  23.  Acts  i — xx.  Rom.  xii.  4 — 8.  1  Cor.  iii — xiv.  2  Cor. 
 ii.  1 — 8.  Epistles  to  Timothy  and  Titus  almost  throughout, 
 &c.  6cc. 
 
 23.  That  Christ  hath  not  entrusted  the  power  of  church-go- 
 vernment to  magistrates,  lordly  bishops,  or  to  believers  in  ge- 
 neral ;  but  to  spiritual  officers,  pastors,  elders,  and  deacons, 
 appointed  by  himself — who  have  full  power  and  warrant  from 
 him  to  hold  spiritual  courts  in  his  name — Sessions,  Presbyte- 
 ries, and  Synods,  when  necessary — but  whose  whole  manage- 
 ment must  be  regulated  by  his  laws  prescribed  in  his  word, 
 1  Cor.  xii.  28.  Eph.  iv.  11  —  14.  1  Thess.  v.  12.  1  Tim.  v.  17. 
 Acts  vi.  1 — 9.  Matth.  xviii.  15 — 20.  and  xvi.  19.  1  Tim.  iv. 
 14.  Acts  XV.  Heb.  xiii.  17-  1  Cor.  iv.  1,  2.  &c.  &c. 
 
 24.  That  Christ's  kingdom  being  of  a  spiritual  nature,  her 
 officers  ought  to  be  elected  to  their  office  by  persons  in  full  com- 
 munion with  her  in  all  her  sealing  ordinances;  no  person's 
 vote  being  preferred  on  any  secular  account,  1  John  iv.  1.  Acts 
 i.  15 — 26.  and  vi.  1 — 6.  and  xiv.  23. 
 
 The  Seceders  also  profess,  thankfully  to  commemorate,  and 
 dutifully  improve  the  singular  favours  of  God,  which  he  hath 
 bestowed  upon  this  church  and  land,  and  by  which  he  hath 
 put  or  kept  us  in  possession  of  his  oracles,  ordinances,  or  other 
 spiritual  blessings  ;  such  as, 
 
 1.  That  notwithstanding  our  fathers'  savage  ignorance  and 
 barbarity,  and  their  great  distance  from  Jerusalem,  the  gospel 
 of  peace  and  salvation  was,  perhaps,  within  about  forty  years 
 after  our  Redeemer's  ascension,  early  introduced  into  our  island, 
 in  fuKiinicnt  of  his  many  precious  j)romiscs,  concerning  the 
 ends  of  the  earth,  and  isles  of  the  sea. 
 
88  AN  HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OP  THE 
 
 2.  That  notwithstanding  all  the  united  force  and  fraud  of 
 the  Popish  clergy,  and  of  the  courts  of  Scotlanrl  and  France, 
 the  Protestant  Reformation  uas,  with  great  regulaiity,  intro- 
 duced into  our  country;  and  by  manifold;, faithful  wrestlings, 
 against  the  rage  of  Papists,  treachery  of  protesfed  Protestants, 
 and  poverty  and  distress  of  ministers,  carried  on  to  further  de« 
 gree  of  purity  than  in  any  other  Protestant  church 
 
 3.  That,  as  during  the  darkness  and  bondage  of  Popery,  he 
 had  isti!)  given  power  to  some  in  our  land  to  witness  for  him, 
 clothed  in  sackcloth  ;  so,  under  the  fearful  apostacies,  profane- 
 ness,  and  persecutions,  between  1600  and  1637,  and  between 
 1 660  and  l68S,  he  had  preserved  for  himself  a  number  of 
 faithful  witnesses  for  his  injured  truths  ;  afforded  them  singu- 
 lar measures  of  bis  Spirit  and  presence,  and  honoured  them  to 
 win  many  souls  to  Christ. 
 
 4.  That  when  Archbishop  Laud,  and  our  profligate  Bishops, 
 assisted  by  King  Charles  I.  and  his  courtiers,  had  reduced  our 
 church  and  nation  to  the  brink  of  Popery  and  slavery,  the 
 Lord  wrought  such  a  deliverance  and  reformation  in  1638,  as 
 astonished  every  serious  beholder,  and  confounded  his  ene- 
 mies; and  by  the  struggles  and  prayers  of  the  then  faithful 
 managers,  laid  the  foundation  of  these  civil  and  religious  pri- 
 vileges which  we  now  enjoy. 
 
 5.  That  at  the  revolution  in  l6S8,  when  our  watchmen  in 
 both  church  and  state  were  remarkably  asleep,  he  redeemed  us 
 out  of  the  very  jaws  of  Popery  and  slavery,  if  not  also  of  a 
 bloody  massacre  ;  and  that  by  means  of  our  tyrant's  own  son- 
 in-law,  a<5sistea  by  a  train  of  almost  miraculous  providences, 
 he  re-established  our  religion  and  liberties,  though  not  altoge- 
 ther in  the  former  glorious  maimer. 
 
 6.  That  when  Queen  Anne  and  her  courtiers  had  ripened 
 their  scheme  for  introducing  a  Popish  pretender  to  the  over- 
 throw of  our  religion  and  liberties,  the  Lord,  by  her  season- 
 able death — by  the  defeat  of  the  rebels  in  ITl-*.  as  well  as  in 
 274,5 — and  by  the  esublishment  of  the  family  of  Hanover  on 
 the  British  throne — hath  preserved  for  us  the  enjoyment  of 
 our  religion  and  liberties. 
 
 7.  That  when  Arminian,  Arian,  and  other  errors,  attended 
 by  outrageous  ecclesiastical  tyranny,  threatened  the  ruin  of  re- 
 ligion in  our  land,  the  Lord  gave  us  a  little  reviving  in  our 
 bondage,  in  the  rise  of  the  Secession  1733  ;  by  means  ot  which, 
 however  sinfully  mismanaged,  by  both  ministers  and  people, 
 the  doctrines  of  the  go-pel  have  been  not  a  little  made  known, 
 and  probably  the  corrupt  parly  in  the  church  somewhat  re- 
 strained from  their  error  or  wickedness. 
 
BISE  AND   PROGRESS  OF  THE  SECESSION.       89 
 
 8.  That  on  several  occasions,  the  Lord  enabled  our  ances- 
 tors solemnly  to  infeft  themselves  and  their  posterity  in  the 
 grant  which  he  had  made  to  his  Son,  Christ,  of  the  Isles,  and 
 utmost  ends  of  the  earth  for  his  possession,  and  on  several  oc- 
 casions to  dedicate  themselves  and  their  seed  to  his  honour- 
 able service;  and  countenanced  them  in  so  doing,  not  only  in 
 external  smiles  of  providence,  but  by  such  remarkable  out- 
 pouring of  his  Spirit,  for  the  conviction,  conversion,  and  re- 
 formation of  men,  as  hath  not  been  known  in  any  period  of 
 the  Christian  church,  since  the  apostolic  age. 
 
 ReckonincT  themselves  commanded  of  God,  to  mourn  over 
 
 c  ....  .  . 
 
 their  own  iniquities,  and  the  iniquities  of  their  fathers  and 
 neighbours,  they,  in  consequence  of  the  above  adherence,  re- 
 nounce every  thing  contrary  thereto,  whether  in  principle  or 
 practice,  and  profess  to  lament  over  the  prevalency  thereof,  as 
 a  ground  of  the  Lord's  controversy  with  this  church  and  na- 
 tion. The  errors  they,  according  to  their  knowledge,  condemn, 
 are  principally  the  Socinian,  Arian,  Arminian,  Popish,  Pre- 
 Jatic,  and  Sectarian. — Among  the  practical  backslidings  i'rom 
 the  once  attained-to,  and  covenanted  work  of  reformation,  which 
 have  happened  in  the  preceding  and  present  age,  as  abuses  of 
 the  above-mentioned,  or  like  singular  favours  of  God,  they 
 enumerate, 
 
 1.  The  re-admission  of  wicked  malignants  to  places  of  civil 
 power  and  trust,  in  order  to  assist  King  Charles  II.  against 
 Cromwell  and  his  party. 
 
 2.  Cromwell's  toleration  of  manifold  errors  and  heresies. 
 
 3.  The  restoration  of  King  Charles  to  his  power  in  l66'0, 
 without  requiring  any  security  for  his  governing  the  nation  ac- 
 cording to  the  good  laws  thereof. 
 
 4.  The  Parliament's  disannulling  all  the  laws  which  had  been 
 made  between  l638  and  l650,  in  favours  of  a  covenanted  work 
 of  reformation,  or  the  good  order  of  the  nation. 
 
 5.  Their  establishing  the  King's  supremacy,  or  spiritual  head- 
 ship over  the  church. 
 
 6.  Their  declaring  of  the  national  covenant,  as  explained  to 
 abjure  Prelacy,  and  the  Articles  of  Perth,  and  the  solemn 
 league,  to  be  unlawful  oaths,  and  not  binding  on  the  swearerg 
 and  subscribers  thereof.  Their  requiring  the  subjects  solemnly 
 to  renounce  them,  and  making  it  treasonable  to  give,  t.\ke, 
 SPEAK,  or  WRITE,  in  defence  of  them — together  with  the  pub- 
 lic burning  of  these  solemn  covenants  with  Gud,  at  Linlithgow 
 «nd  Edinburgh. 
 
 f.'t 
 
90  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT  OF  THE 
 
 7.  The  restoration  of  Prelacy,  after  it  had  been  found  con- 
 trary to  the  word  of  God,  and  repeatedly  abjured  in  solem  co- 
 venants:— Ministers  and  others',  neglect  to  give  proper  testi- 
 mony against  the  introduction  thereof;  and  too  general  com- 
 pliance therewith  ;  and  the  terrible  persecution  of  such  as 
 faithfully  opposed  it. 
 
 8.  The  obliging  of  the  subjects,  by  manifold  oaths  and  de- 
 clarations, to  approve  the  various  impieties  of  that  persecute 
 ing  period. 
 
 9-  King  Charles  II. 's  indulgences  of  Presbyterian  ministers 
 to  exercise  their  office,  which  flowed  from  his  blasphemous 
 claim  to  ecclesiastical  supremacy,  and  were  clogged  with  seve- 
 ral sinful  restrictions  :  and  Kins  James  VII. 's  unlimited  tole- 
 ration,  founded  in  his  claim  to  absolute  power,  and  plainly  ni- 
 tended  for  the  introduction  of  Popery,  and  Presbyterian  mi- 
 nisters' thankful  acceptance  of  the  same. 
 
 10.  That  the  revolution  Parliament  did  not  revive  the  legal 
 securities  given  to  a  covenanted  reformation  between  iGSS  and 
 l(i50,  but  even  left  some  bad  laws  at  least  not  plainly  re- 
 scinded. 
 
 11.  That  they  did  not  duly  resent  the  heaven-daring  inju- 
 ries which  had  been  done  to  the  national  covenant  and  solemn 
 league,  nor  abolished  Prelacy,  as  contrary  to  the  word  of  God, 
 and  these  covenants. 
 
 12.  That  in  the  union  settlement  1707,  the  Parliament,  in 
 manifest  contradiction  to  the  covenants,  and  the  belief  of  the 
 divine  light  of  Presbytery,  not  only  consented  to,  but  actiialltf 
 confirmed,  the  perpetual  establishment  of  Prelacy,  and  the  ce- 
 
 emonies  in  England. 
 
 13.  That  the  British  Parliament  restored  patronage,  and 
 the  superstitious  Yule  vacance  ;  established  a  toleration  of  Pre- 
 lacy, and  every  other  form  of  religion  in  Scotland,  only  Po- 
 pery and  blasphemy  excepted ;  and  have  repealed  the  penal 
 statutes  against  witchcraft. 
 
 14.  That  they  imposed  the  abjuration  oath  upon  ministers 
 and  others ;  and  in  an  Erastinn  manner,  required  the  Scotch 
 ministers  to  read  from  their  pulpit,  on  the  Lord's  day,  in  the 
 time  of  divine  worship,  a  civil  proclamation  relative  to  Cap- 
 tain Porteous,  under  pain  of  seclusion  from  sitting  in  Presby- 
 tery. 
 
 15.  That  the  Presbyterian  clergy,  at  the  Revolution,  did  not 
 more  plainly  niourn  over,  and  teslifv  against  the  horrid  brandies 
 of  apostncy  in  the  preceding  persecuting  peiiod;  and  did  not 
 more  readily  and  solemnly  assert  the  sole  headship  of  Chiist 
 
RISE  AND  PROGRESS  OP  THK  SECESSION.      -OI 
 
 oyer  his  church,  the  divine  right  of  Presbyterian  government, 
 and  the  intrinsic  power  oi  the  church,  wliich  hail  bc2n  so  dar- 
 ingly denied  and  lenounced  in  the  preceding  period.  Nay,  did 
 themselves  too  readily  dissolve  or  prorogue  their  Gene  al  As- 
 semblies, in  obedience  to  the  Erastian  requirements  ot"  King 
 William  and  Queen  Anne. 
 
 16.  That  instead  of  being  duly  censured,  many  who  had 
 plainly  perjured  themselves  in  their  compliance  with  Prelacy, 
 and  in  taking  the  impious  oaths  and  bonds,  and  even  in  per- 
 secuting the  Lord's  people,  were  admitted  to  church-fellowship, 
 na}',  to  the  office  of  elders  or  ministers,  without  proper  tokens 
 of  repentance. 
 
 17.  That  the  bulk  of  the  ministry,  to  the  no  small  offence 
 of  the  godly,  and  renting  of  the  church,  complied  with  the 
 Erastian  and  sinful  orders  of  the  Pailiament,  relative  to  the 
 abjuration  oath,  and  proclamation  concerning  Captain  Porte- 
 ous. 
 
 18.  That  in  their  rage  against  the  Marrow  of  Modern  Di- 
 vinily,  the  A  ssembly  condemned  a  variety  of  precious  gos- 
 pel-truths ;  but  have  slightly  censured,  and  more  frequently 
 screened  from  censure,  such  as  have  been  pannelled  at  their  bar 
 for  Arian,  Arminian,  or  other  errors ;  and  have  refused  to  as- 
 sert the  truth,  in  express  opposition  thereto. 
 
 19.  Their  violent  and  habitual  promoting  of  patronage,  and 
 intrusion  of  ministers,  ordinarily  very  unfit  for  the  office ;  and 
 persecuting  of  such  as  faithfully  oppose  it*. 
 
 These  things,  together  with  the  so  frequent  repetition  of 
 oaths,  relative  to  allegiance  and  trade  ;  receiving  of  the  Lord's 
 Supper  in  the  English  manner,  as  a  test  of  loyalty  ;  swearing, 
 by  touching  and  kissing  the  gospels;  repeated  rebellion  of  a 
 malignant  party  against  our  lawful  Sovereigns  of  the  family  of 
 Hanover,  in  favours  of  a  Popish  pretender ;  abounding  igno- 
 rance of  the  Christian  doctrines  ;  neglect  of  God's  worship  in 
 public,  private,  or  secret ;  profane  cursing  and  swearing  in 
 common  discourse ;  open  violation  of  the  Sabbath  ;  notorious 
 neglect  of  relative  duties;  admission  of  insufficient  and  wicked 
 persons  to  offices  in  church  and  state,  or  to  the  seals  of  God's 
 covenant;  drunkenness  and  bribery,  deceit  and  profane  swear- 
 ing in  the  election  of  magistrates,  or  even  of  ministers  ;  abound- 
 ing murder,  uncleanncss,  luxury,  theft,  smuggling,  stage-plays  ; 
 
 •  Sec  these  trutlis,  jnercics,  and  steps  of  apostacy,  more  fully  represent- 
 ed in  the  re-cxliibition  of  the  Scicdcrs'  testimonies",  particularly  tl)c  second 
 testimony;  and  in  that  most  excellent  act  concerning  tlie doctrine  of  grwc, 
 &c  and  several  church-hiatorici. 
 
S2  AN   HISTORICAL  ACCOUNT,  &C. 
 
 games  at  caiiis  and  dice  ;  lying,  reviling,  backbiting,  and 
 covetoiisness,  they  profess  to  detest  and  mourn  over,  as  causes 
 ot  the  Lord's  wrath  still  standing  against  the  generation.  But 
 it  is  not  to  be  imagined,  that  every  one  hath  an  equal  clear 
 view  of  all  these  evils,  particularly  such  as  relate  to  former 
 times ;  nor  that  every  one  hath  the  same  view  of  the  sinful- 
 ness of  each  of  these  facts. 
 
93 
 
 BRIEF  EXPLANATION 
 
 Tht  Terms  used  in  the  preceding  Pages. 
 
 -TXTHBiST.     One  who  denies  the  being  of  God. 
 
 Arian.  One  who  denies  the  equality  of  the  Son  to  the  Fa- 
 ther in  the  Godhead ;  so  called,  iiom  one  Arius,  who  in  the 
 fourth  century,  disturbed  the  church  by  his  heretical  opinions 
 on  the  subject  of  the  Trinity. — The  Arians  are  of  two  kinds. 
 Both  admit  the  pre-existence  of  Christ ;  but  the  proper 
 Arians  make  him  only  a  super-angelic  being,  the  first  and 
 highest  of  creatures  ;  whereas  the  Semi-Arians  allow  to  him 
 some  of  the  perfections  of  Deity,  and  make  him  a  kind  of  in- 
 ferior God. 
 
 Arminian.  One  who  maintains  the  opinion  of  Jacobus 
 Arminius,  a  Dutch  divine.  The  leading  principles  of  this 
 sect,  are  known  by  the  name  of  the  Five  Arminian  Points. — 
 They  maintain,  1  Conditional  election ;  2.  Universal  redemp- 
 tion ;  8.  Free-will,  or  man's  natural  power  to  convert  him- 
 self; 4.  The  resistibility  of  divine  grace;  5.  The  possibility 
 of  falling  totally  and  finally  from  a  state  of  grace. 
 
 Antinomian.  One  who  denies  the  obligation  of  the  moral 
 law  on  believers  in  Christ,  and  affirms  that  good  works  are  un- 
 necessary. The  term  is  often  impropeily  given  to  those  who 
 are  advocates  for  the  freedom  and  sovereignty  of  divine  grace, 
 although  they  maintain  the  necessity  of  good  works. 
 
 Anabaptist.  One  who  maintains  that  children  ought  not 
 to  be  baptized  ;  and  that  those  who  have  had  baptism  admi- 
 nistered in  infancy,  ought  to  be  re-baptized. 
 
 ^^NTICIIR1ST.  Literally,  one  who,  opposes  Christ,  a  term 
 used  in  the  New  Testament,  and,  by  divines,  generally  ap- 
 plied to  the  Pope,  and  to  that  power  which,  as  the  head  of 
 th*  Romish  church,  he  has  usurped  ov«r  the  conicicncc*  of 
 men. 
 
94  A  BRI^F  EPLAN/ITION  OF  THE 
 
 Blasphemy.  A  general  term_,  expressive  of  any  indig- 
 nity ofTercd  unto  God  himself  by  the  tongues  of  men  ;  as 
 when  tilings  are  said  of  him  unworthy  of  his  greatness,  incon- 
 sistent with  his  hoHncss,  reproachful  to  his  character,  or  which 
 manifest  a  contempt  of  his  perfections,  word,  or  works. 
 
 Deist.  One  who  professes  to  believe  the  existence  and 
 unity  of  the  Deity;  but  who  denies  that  he  has  ever  given 
 any  written  revelation  of  his  will^  and  who  refuses  that  the 
 Scriptures  arc  the  word  of  God. 
 
 Erastian,  One  who  adopts  the  sentiments  of  Erastus,  a 
 German  lawyer  ;  asserting,  that  church-government  and  dis- 
 cipline are  entirely  to  be  regulated  by  the  will  of  the  civil  ma- 
 gistrate. 
 
 Episcopalian.  One  who  maintains  that  there  ouglit  to  be 
 in  the  church  an  order  of  officers  superior  to  teaching  elders, 
 styled  Bishops,  in  whom  the  government  of  the  church  is 
 vested. 
 
 Enthusiast.  One  who  depends  on  private  internal  reve- 
 lations, without  regarding  the  written  word  ;  or,  in  general, 
 who  is  guided  by  an  over-heated  imagination  in  matters  of 
 religion,  without  regard  to  Scripture,  or  common  sense. 
 
 FaMILIST.  One  who  is  of  that  religious  description  known 
 formerly  by  the  style  oH/ie  Family  of  Love ;  a  species  of  Ana- 
 baptists, who  made  the  whole  of  religion  to  lie  in  inward  feel- 
 ings of  divine  love. 
 
 Heathen.  A  general  name  for  those  nations  which  are 
 ignorant  of  divine  revelation,  and  live  in  superstition  and  ido- 
 ktry. 
 
 Infidel.  Any  one  who  believes  not  in  Jesus  Christ,  as 
 the  Son  of  God,  and  the  Saviour  of  the  world ;  nor  in  the 
 Scriptures,  as  divinely  inspired. 
 
 Independent.  One  who  accounts  every  particular  con- 
 gregation an  entire  and  independent  church  ;  and  refuses  that 
 the  church  ought  to  be  governed  either,  on  the  one  hand,  by 
 Bishops,  or,  on  the  other  hand,  by  assemblies  of  ministers, 
 known  by  the  name  of  Presbyteries,  Synods,  &c. 
 
 Jew.  One  of  the  seed  of  Israel,  who  imagines  that  the 
 Messiah  has  not  yet  appeared,  and  continues  to  worship  God 
 according  to  the  law  of  Moses. 
 
 Jesuit.  A  member  of  the  Society  of  Jesus  :  a  Popish  or- 
 der, instituted  with  a  view  to  oppose  the  Reformation  ;  and 
 whose  principles  are  subversive  of  civil  govenuncnt,  and  con- 
 fidence between  man  and  man.  The  Jesuits,  long  troublesome 
 to  Protestants,  became  at  last  intolerable  to  Roman  Catholics 
 thcmselvc5,  and  gcme  time  since  were  destroy c\.l. 
 
TERMS  USED  IN  THE  PRECEDING  PAGES.   95 
 
 JuRANT.     One  who  ha*  sworn  an  oath. 
 
 Libertine.  One  of  loose  principles  in  religion,  and  of 
 loose  practice. 
 
 Monk.  One  of  the  Popish  religion,  who  has  professed  to 
 renounce  the  world,  has  vowed  celibacy,  lives  in  a  monastery 
 subject  to  certain  rules,  is  principally  employed  in  offices  of  de« 
 votion,  and  is  esteemed  singularly  pious. 
 
 Prelate.  A  Bishop ;  so  styled,  because  he  is  preferred 
 in  honour  and  power  above  his  brethren  in  the  office  of  the 
 ministry. 
 
 Papist.  A  Roman  Catholic ;  so  styled,  because  he  ac* 
 knowledges  the  authority  of  the  Pope. 
 
 Pelagian.  One  who  follows  the  opinions  of  Pclagins,  a 
 heretic  of  the  fifth  century,  who,  among  other  things,  denied 
 original  sin,  and  the  necessity  of  the  Spirit's  operation  in  the 
 soul  in  order  to  conversion. 
 
 Protestant.  One  who  professes  the  reformed  religion  ; 
 so  styled,  because  the  first  reformers jpro/e^/ct?  against  the  church 
 of  Rome. 
 
 Patronage.  The  method  of  introducing  candidates  for 
 the  ministry  into  charges  in  the  church,  by  the  presentation  of 
 a  lay  palroji,  without  regarding  the  choice  of  the  people. 
 
 Quakers.  A  religious  sect,  who  despise  the  written  word, 
 and  the  instituted  ordinances  of  religion,  and  depend  on  in- 
 ternal revelations,  and  the  motions  of  what  they  style  the 
 spirit  within  them  ;  styled  Quakers,  because,  at  their  first  ap- 
 pearance, when  the  spirit  moved  them,  they  fell  into  tremb- 
 lings, and  shakings,  and  convulsive  agitations. 
 
 SociNiAN.  One  who  espouses  the  opinions  of  SocimtSf  a 
 heretic  who  appeared  soon  after  the  Reformation.  Socinians 
 deny  that  Christ  existed  before  his  incarnation,  allow  him  to 
 be  only  a  mere  man,  reject  his  atonement,  and  consider  him 
 since  his  ascension  as  a  7nade  God. 
 
 Sectarian.  One  who  adheres  to  a  particular  sect  or  de- 
 scription of  Christians,  different  from  that  established  by  civil 
 authority.  The  term  is  commonly  used  in  a  bad  sense,  as  in- 
 cluding the  idea  of  separating  from  the  established  religion 
 without  sufficient  reason. 
 
 ScETTic.  One  who  doubts  of  every  thing,  and  believes 
 nothing. 
 
 Schism.  Unlawful  separation  from  a  church  ;  or  want  of 
 love  and  affection,  while  continuing  in  it. 
 
 3 
 
96  A  BRIEF  KXLANATION,  (5cC. 
 
 Turk.  An  individual  of  an  eastern  nation,  which  has 
 erected  a  great  empire,  called  the  Turkish  empire,  the  capital 
 of  which  is  Constantinople.  The  term  is  frequently  used  to 
 mean  a  Mahometan,  because  that  nation  are  believers  in  Ma- 
 homet as  the  prophet  of  God. 
 
 FINIS. 
 
 Prlntrd  Inj  Rilfmr  Sf  Clarke, 
 Edint/ur^/i,  lsl9. 
 
BW5008.B87V.2 
 
 A  compendious  history  of  the  British 
 
 Princeton  Theological  Seminary- Speer  Library 
 
 lll|lllllll|l|lllllll   III   III     llllll|lllll|llll|llllllt 
 
 1    1012  00037  9166