/J-- ^ 5 THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY, | I Princeton, N. J. J I ll~5~ % Jl^amfJ ^^^^:^- Cffse, Dwision ,...Jj. © Shelf, Sectian |y Booh- No, .^^_..._ ■sv^^i;^--^ ABUIEL'S ESSAYS ADVENT AND KINGDOM OF CHRIST, AND THE EVENTS CONNECTED THEREWITH. ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN THE INVESTIGATOR, AND NOW REVISED AND CONSIDERABLY ENLARGED, J.Vr, 3y-.-rLf LONDON: SIMPKIN & MARSHALL ; NISBET ; SEELEY & SONS; HATCHARD & SONS; BURNE. LEEDS— W. E. SOMERSCALE. RETFORD— T. TURVEY. 1834. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from Princeton Theological Seminary Library http://www.archive.org/details/abdielsessaysonaOObroo CONTENTS. Essay. Page, i. Introduction 1 II. The Second Advent 15 III. The Kingdom of Christ 25 IV. The Place of Manifestation 41 V. The Participation of the Saints 57 VI. The First Resurrection 64 VII. The Judgement 77 VIII. The State of Separate Spirits 93 IX. The Resurrection State 102 X. Our Lord's Prophecy (Matt. xxiv. xxv.) 121 XI. Parable of the Ten Virgins 157 XII. Parable of the Talents 173 XIII. Parable of the Sheep and Goats 189 XIV. The Last Days (2 Tun. in. 1—5.) 201 XV. The Pre-miUennial Advent and New Dispensation. . . 245 ON THE ADVENT AND KINGDOxM OF CHRIST, AND THE EVENTS CONNECTED THEREWITH. Essay I. INTRODUCTORY. I enter on the present discussion with somewhat mingled feelings. Looking at my subject, I have a pleasing confi- dence, that my heart is inditing a good matter ; since I am about to write of the things that are made touching the King : but when I consider, on the other hand, (what it were disingenuous to conceal,) that there are excellent and learned men, followers of the Lord Jesus, who are decidedly opposed to the views which I have adopted, I cannot but be diffident in myself ; and am led, with increased conviction of its need, to seek the teaching of the Holy Spirit. Not however that I would for a moment give place to the notion, entertained by some, that because there are eminent ministers of the Gospel, who have not cordially embraced these views, therefore they cannot be important, nor even true : the case of Peter and Barnabas in respect to the circumcision of the Gentiles, s- in which was involved the vital doctrine of justification by faith, plainly shews, that men of the highest attainments in piety, who have been pillars in the Church, and ordinarily under the influence of inspiration, have nevertheless been slow of heart in regard to truths of infinite moment. These circumstances however move me to commence this series of essays, with the notice of two or three serious objec- tions, directed against the subject in general. Other objec- tions, which aflfect particular points only, I shall endeavour to meet as those points come to be considered ; but these, I repeat, affect the whole subject, and are of that character, that, if the mind be under their influence, it will be predisposed against the clearest and most scriptural statements, and thus prevented from properly weighing any thing which may be advanced. a Gal. II. 10— IG. No. I. B I. The questionable propriety of studying and of discussing prophecy, especially unfulfilled prophecy, is one of those objec- tions, which must be met in the outset. "*" It chiefly consists in the alleged impossibility of understanding or judging of a pro- phecy, until the event has proved its meaning. But how con- trary is this to the experience of the Church ! Promise, the greater portion of which is unfulfilled prophecy, is declared in the New Testament to be a principal means whereby we are made partakers of the Divine Nature ;b which could not be, were it entirely vague and indefinable : and under the Old Testament dispensation, the Church was chiefly sustained and nourished by prophecy ; most of the burning and shining lights raised up in it behig prophets. The very first promise, that the seed of the woman should bruise the head of the serpent, was an unfulfilled prophecy, to which the Church took heed for 4000 years. Noah prepared his ark, moved by the fear of an unfulfilled prophecy or promise ; and Abraham saw afar off and rejoiced in the day of Christ by means of another. Joseph would not have directed his bones to be removed, had he not depended on prophecy for the going out of his people : to which prophecy the Lord afterwards referred Moses and Aaron, as the pledge, that he would redeem them. The Is- raelites were encouraged to labour for their deliverance from captivity, by the prophecy concerning it : for as Jeremiah had prayed for and obtained an understanding of the restoration of his people, when they were about to be led into captivity ;c so Daniel understood the times from the study of the writings of Jeremiah ;d just as the faithful were afterwards waiting for the Consolation of Israel from the study (as is presumed) of the book of Daniel. It was through attention to unfulfilled prophecy, that the christians left Jerusalem and escaped to the mountain, when the city was beseiged by the Romans : and the Lord hath, equally for our admonition, foretold the signs of that greater destruction, of which the overthrow of Jerusalem was but a type. I am aware that there are difficulties attending the inter- pretation of the prophecies ; and that, although some are to * The notice of this first objection was waived by me in the first number of my papers which appeared in the Investigator, because it was taken up in the Editorial article ; and it is now copied nearly verbatim from that article. b 2 Pet. I. 4. ^ Jer. xxxii. 16—25, 36—44. d Dan. ix. 2. be literally understood, many are figurative or allegorical, whilst others are constructed of the literal and figurative in- termixed : but of those which are not declared to be sealed up, the difficulty has chiefly arisen from the extravagant practice of spiritualizing or allegorizing all passages which relate to the future. And great is the advantage which this system has given to the enemies of Revelation. They tell us that Scripture is not a proper guide, because every man hath his own interpretation — his own way of explaining or accom- modating it. The imaginations of commentators, or the sen- timents of friends, have too frequently been made the key to modern expositions ; whilst the plain text, which is the safest guide, has been neglected. The apostles are often brought forward, as an instance of men who erred in regard to the proper understanding of those prophecies, which related to the first advent ; and from their mistakes the impossibility of any being able to understand what is foretold of the second advent is confidently insisted on. But I am of opinion that this circumstance is commonly mis- stated and still more misapplied. I cannot think the apos- tles and first disciples misunderstood the general scope of the prophecies, which led them to expect at that time a manifes- tation of the kingdom of Christ on earth ; though they might have had much confusion and obscurity in regard to the tirney and details, and nature of that kingdom. The fault of the apostles was, that — though repeatedly warned, that there were other prophecies, which shewed that Messiah must first suffer — they overlooked these, and suflFered their attention to be ab- sorbed with one class of predictions only. What was there to have prevented them from comprehending such prophecies as the following : viz. — that Jesus should be born of a virgin ; — that he should ride upon an ass ; — that he should be be- trayed by one of his followers ; — that they should pierce his hands and his feet ; — that they should part his garments and cast lots for his vesture ; — that he should be numbered with transgressors ; and many other things, which being plainly foretold were literally fulfilled } The sharp rebukes of Jesus, because the disciples did not understand that he ought to have suffered these things, and because they were " slow of heart to believe all that the prophets had written," appear incon- sistent, if they really could notliave been understood. Indeed the whole Sanhedrim, ungodly and darkened as they were. did nevertheless answer Herod most correctly from the pro- phets, that Christ should be born at Bethlehem : and it seems difficult to give a satisfactory reason therefore, why lue may not previously derive some knowledge of circumstances which will attend the second advent ; seeing that they are spoken of in Scripture, apparently as free from any figurative structure as the passages already quoted. If the apostles erred, we ha,ve at least the benefit of their example : which is un- doubtedly recorded, — not to lead us to conclude, that we must inevitably mistake likewise ; but that we may profit by their errors and avoid them. There is another series of pro- phecies, relating to God's dealings with the Jews, which are applicable to the question before us ; and which would lead to the conclusion, that one eminent use of fulfilled prophecy is, to argue from it as certain and literal an accomplishment of 2/«fulfilled : provided, as we are throughout assuming, that the evident structure of it be not allegorical or emblematical. How remarkably, for example, has icrath fallen upon the Jews, without one jot or tittle having failed ! They are sifted among the nations ; they are become a by- word, a hiss, a pro- verb, a reproach ; they abide without a prince, an altar, a sacrifice ; not to mention other peculiar sufterings which they endured of old time. Now Joshua lays it do^Mi as a rule, " that as not one thing had failed of all the good things which ' the Lord had spoken concerning them ; but all had come to • pass : so therefore would the Lord bring upon them all the * evil things." Seeing then that the evil has now been brought to pass, and not one thing has failed of that ; by what rule, (it may be asked,) upon Avhat consistent principle, can any man venture to sa3^ that the promises of that good, now again to succeed, is only a figure ; and that we are not jus- tified in expecting a literal fulfilment }^ I do not deny that thei'e are difficulties attending the ex- position of prophecy ; and that, if this be true in regard to the events predicted, it is more extensively the case with re- gard to times and dates. As respects the day, or even the year of an event, I am quite persuaded, that God has pur- posely obscured it. But our Lord would not therefore have us indifterent and careless, either to the event or the period of its fulfilment ; but, on the very ground that we know not the e Compare Josh, xxiii. 14, 15, andJer. xxxii. 42 — 44. hour, He commands us to zf«/cZt.^ And though the ^/wy can- not be known, something of the si(/ns of its approach may be ascertained, with sufficient correctness for us to be assured " that the time of our redemption draweth nigh." St. Paul assumes of the Thessalonians, that they had so much of ac- quaintance with " the times and the seasons," as to supersede the necessity of writing to them on that subject ;g insomuch, that, though the day of the Lord would come upon the iroi^Id as a thief in the night, it would not overtake the7n in like man- ner. The Scriptures teach us that there are prophec^ies, which were not intended to be known by the christians of former ages, which nevertheless will be known by that generation for whom they are written ; of which Psalm cii. 18 ; Daniel XII. 4 and 9 ; and 1 Peter i. 10 — 12 are remarkable instances. Let us bear in remembrance therefore, that it is declared to be one of the special offices of the Holy Spirit, " to guide us into all truth, and to shoiu ns things to come "^ and that the prophets, who prophesied of the sufferings and glory of Christ, did themselves " inquire and search diligently" concerning it, — searching," even when the words w^ere scarce uttered by them, " what, or what maxner of time the Spirit of Christ which was in them did signify. i On the other hand there were men who neglected the prophets, and were rebuked by our Saviour because they knew not the signs of the times ;J and the burden of his lamentation over Jerusalem was, that they knew not the time of their visitation. ^ ^ II. The second objection I shall notice is, that the doctrines of modern millennarians are a novelty ; — that they were not entertained by the early christians, nor inserted by the ortho- dox Church in any creed or confession of faith. Now in regard to the christians of the two first centuries, there is not a solitary instance of any one of them contradict- ing the doctrine : all of those, whose works are extant, (un- less they be some small fragments to be found in other au- thors,) explicitly teach it.* And it should also be observed, that the doctrine does not rest upon the judgment or discern- ment of those men, but upon their veracity ; for some of them * I refer for ample quotations on this subject to The Resurrection Re- vealed, by Dr. Homes, first published in 1654, and now reprinted by the Editor of the Investigator. f Matt. XXIV. 36—42, g 1 Thess. v. 1—4. h John xvi. 13. i 1 Peter i. 10, 11. J Matt. xvi. 3. k Luke xix. 44. profess to have received these things direct from the apostles. Justyn Maityr lived before John the apostle died ; and Ire- naeus was the hearer of Polycarp, the disciple of John. This Irenceus, in his second book against heresies, clearly maintains the doctrine ; and the reason of his noticing the subject in his work on heresies was, that none denied the doctrine but here- tics, who altogether denied the resurrection, and held that the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob was not the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. But I have less need to insist upon this point, because the chief of the modern opponents of these views has himself admitted, though indirectly, that all the fathers of the two first centuries maintained them*. In the third century Xepos wrote a book against the Alle- gorical Expositors, or those who explained the promises re- lating to the Millennium figuratively. 1 For Origen had now introduced that vicious system of spiritualizing the Scriptures, by which he drew over many to his views, who were perhaps disgusted at the preposterous things which some carnal men had added to this doctrine. t Dionysius, a disciple of Origen, perceiving that the views of Xepos overthrew the principle of his master's expositions, endeavoured to refute them ; in doing which he was led openly to deny the canonical autho- rity of the Apocalypse, because the testimony of that book stood in his way ! Mosheim in his History of the Church admits, " that long before this controversy, an opinion had ' prevailed, that Christ was to come and reign a thousand * years among men, before the entire and final dissolution * See Dr. Hamilton's work against the Millennarians, page 308. The Doctor says indeed, that the principles of ]Millennarianism were opposed and rejected by almost every Father of the church rcith the exception of Barnabas, Clement, Papias, Justyn Martyr, Irenseus, Nepos, Apollinarius, Lactantius, and Tertullian 1 — That is, with the exception of all the Fathers whom he knows of before Origen, and some who were contemporary and subsequent to Origen \ He prefers the Fa- thers of /fl/er date, because " their learning and talents far surpassed any in the first centuries of the church." — That is to say, the further from the fovmtain, the more pure he considers the waters ! t For proof that eminent christian writers always held the system of interpretation adopted by Origen to be most pernicious, see Luther, Annotationes in Deuteronomium, cap. i. fo. 55 ; Mosheim, Ch. Hist, cent. Ill, pt. II, sect, o, 6* ; Milner Ch. Hist. Vol. I. p. 469. Extracts may be found at length in the Investigator, Vol. II. p. 202. 1 Eusebii Hist. lib. vii. cap. 21. ' of this world ;" — that this opinion " had hitherto" (i. e. up * to the middle of the third century) " met with no opposi- *tion;" — and that now " its credit becan to decline princi- * pally through the influence and authority of Origen, who * opposed it with the greatest warmth, because it was incom- * patible with some of his favourite sentiments." Vol. I. p. 284. One might conclude, from the remainder of Mosheim's ac- count, that Dionysius was completely successful in overthrow- ing this doctrine ;* but we have unquestionable proof that the Millennarians still formed the greater part of the Church till the latter end of the fourth century. For in the year 325 sat the Nicene council, attended by all the bishops in Christen- dom, and drew up the form which is now used in the commu- nion service of the established church, called the Nicene creed. The last clause of this creed is as follows : "I look for the resurrection of the dead and the life of the world to come ;" which the council thus expounds. — " The world was made in- ' ferior (fj.LKporepoc) because of foreknowledge : for God fore- * knew that man would sin. Therefore we expect new heavens * and a new earth according to the holy Scriptures ; the Epi- ' phany and Kingdom of the great God and our Saviour Jesus * Christ then appearing. And as Daniel says (chap. vii. 18) * the saints of the Most High shall take the kingdom. And ' there shall be a pure and holy land, the land of the living * and not of the dead : which David foreseeing with the eye ' of faith, exclaims, I believe to see the goodness of the Lord * in the land of the living — the land of the meek and humble. * Blessed, saith Christ, (Matt. v. 5,) are the meek, for they * shall inherit the earth. And the prophet saith, (Isa. xxvi. ' 6,) The feet of the meek and humble shall tread upon it."t Later even than this period Jerome (who was no friend to the doctrine, but the contrary) admits, " that many christians and * martyrs had affirmed the things which he denied ; and that * a great multitude of christians agreed in them in his own * day : so that though he did not follow them, he could not ' condemn them." * The terms ** learned and judicious^^ applied to the publications of Dionysius on this subject in the English translation of his History, are not in the original Latin, but are foisted in, (as many other things are most unwarrantably,) by the Translator. t See the forms of the Ecclesiastical Doctrines in the Hist. Act. Con. Nic. Gelasii Cyzioeni. 8 The conversion of Constantine, and the protection which he gave to Christianity, appears to have tended the most to ren- der this doctrine unpopular. Home had been considered by christians as the seat of antichrist and destined to destruction. Lactantius, v.'ho lived in the time of Constantine, in his Book on the Divine Institutes, says, — " The Roman authority, by ' which now the world is governed, (my soul dreads to speak ' it — ^but it will speak it, because it shall come to pass,) shall * be taken from the earth, and the empire shall return into ' Asia, and again the East shall rule and the West obey."i^ This opinion was now therefore by timid and temporizing persons suppressed, or explained away after Origen's manner. Eusebius, (who also questions the Apocalypse,) proceeds so far as to make Rome the Neic Jerusalem, because Constantine turned the temples into christian churches. ii And the popes in after ages discountenanced the doctrine, as militating against their usurpation and dogma, that the Millennium com- menced with Romish domination in the Church. Thus the doctrine was thrown into the back- ground until the time of the Reformation, when it was again revived ; but owing to the fanatical turbulence of the Anabaptists on the continent, and the fifth-monarchy men in this country, it again fell so much into disrepute, that many timidly kept it out of view, until succeeding generations lost sight of it. In the meanwhile however the doctrine was by no means generally denied : many eminent men were raised up from time to time who advocated these truths in the established church ; and the dissenters still continued to hold it so generally, that at last to broach these opinions exposed a man to the imputation of being a dissenter. And to show that these opinions were entertained by chief persons in the Church, and generally taught at the time of the Reformation, I shall finally bring forward two extracts from the Catechism drawn up by the prelates in the time of Edward VI, and authorized by that king in the last year of his reign, o " Q. How is that petition. Thy kingdom come, to be under- stood ?" " Ans. We ask that his kingdom may come, for that as ' yet we see not all things subject to Christ : we see not yet * how the stone is cut out of the mountain without human m Book VII. c. 15. n Eocl. Hist. Vol. III. p. 24. o 20th May, 155.3. 9 * help, Avhicli breaks into pieces and reduceth to nothing the * image described by Daniel : or how the only rock, which is ' Christ, dotli possess and obtain the empire of the whole * w^orld given him of the Father. As yet Antichrist is not * slain ; whence it is that we desire and pray, that at length ' it may come to pass and be fulfilled ; and that Christ alone * may reign with his saints according to the di\dne promises ; ' and that he may live and have dominion in the world, ac- * cording to the decrees of the holy Gospel, and not according * to the traditions and laws of men and the wills of the tyrants ' of the world." " Q. God grant that his kingdom may come most speedily, 'ard at death ; but exhorts them to he patient until the coming of the Lord. a St. Peter also tells his people : " when the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory, that fadeth not away."^ So St. John ; — " we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him.c"* a Jas. V. 7. b 1 Pet. v. 4. c i John in. 2. * The personal hope of two of the apostles, constituting, in some mea- sure, their experience in the immediate prospect of death, has been handed down for us by the Holy Ghost. St. Paul says : " I am now ready to ' be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand. I have fought a ' good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith : hence- * forth there is laid up for me a crown of righteousness, which the Lord, * the righteous judge, shall give me at that day." (2 Tim. iv. 6—8.) St. Peter, when admonished by the Lord, '* that he must shortly put off his fleshly tabernacle," thinks it proper to write an Epistle to the faith- ful, the whole burden of which is, to confirm them in the expectation, that these present heavens and earth shaU be dissolved, as those in the days of Noah were, and again be succeeded by new heavens and a new earth ; — that he had followed no cunningly devised fable, when he made known to them the power and coming of the Lord ; but had had a vi- sible specimen of it, when he beheld the transfiguration on the Mount ; — 'and that apostate men would arise in the last days, treating the pro- mise of his coming with scoff. (See the Second Epistle of Peter through- out.) He finally confirms all by the testimony of St. Paul, who, (he says,) in all his Epistles makes mention of these things. D IS These things are consistent, and what we should expect, it the great recompense were generally deferred till the second appearing of Jesus Christ ; and if it were the prize chiefl}^ held up to view. We shall in that case not only find it laid down in the New Testament as a doctrine of the apostles ; but w^e shall perceive the primitive church in general to be aiFected with this view of the subject ; and either speaking, or spoken of, as looking eagerly forward to such an event. There will be other marks of grace discernible ; but this mark, at a time when I am presuming their hopes to have been bound up in the doctrine of Christ's second appearance, and not in the rest entered into immediately after death, — this mark, I say, would then be an essential one : the want of it would imply the grossest ignorance of the prevailing tenets of the Church ; or the grossest unbelief of those which were perceived. This feature, however, pre-eminently marks the character of the scripture saints, as I shall evince bv a few passages from the Epistles of St. Paul. In Romans the earnest expectation of the new creature is said to be " icaiting for the manifestation of the sons of God — groaning within itself and waiting for the redemption of the body."^ In Corinthians, as we have seen, he thanks God, " that they came behind in no gift ; waiting for the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ. "^ And of the Thessalonians he says, " that they turned from idols, to serve the living and the true God, and to ic a it for his Son from heaven."^ To the Philip- pians he thus speaks of himself and them : — " For our con- versation is in heaven, from ichence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ."? Yea, in one passage, already in part quoted, the Apostle so decidedly makes loving the appear- ing of Christ a mark of grace, that he seems in a measure to lij?iit the reward of righteousness to those only, who partake of this desire : "A crown (saith he) which the Lord shall give me at that day ; and not to me only ; but unto all them also that love his appearing .""^ A text in the Epistle to the Hebrews appears to make the same distinction and limitation : " Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many ; and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation."! We have much more to the same purport in the Epistles, d Rom. VIII. 19, 23. e i Cor. 1.7. U Thess. i. 9, 10. g Chap- III. 20. ^ 2 Tim. iv, 8. i Heb, ix. 28. 19 especially in those of St. Paul, without insisting on numerous passages in the Gospels. Whether the Apostle speaks of himself, of his followers, or of both together, he still keeps holding forth to their view the end of this present dispen- sation ; and he treats of it, as though, in regard to the Church, a succeeding generation might not be recognised. Is it to himself he refers ? — His words are : "I know whom I have believed, and am persuaded that he is able to keep that which I have committed unto him against that day."^ Is it them he speaks of ? — " He which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ."! Does he include himself with them ? then he says ; " the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed ; — ive, which are alive and remain, shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air."i^ The greatest and most ordinary objects of religious interest and expectation are also deferred for their completion unto this time. Is it grace ? — though given now ; still, as to its consummation, " it is to be brought unto us at the revelation of Jesus Christ. "n Is it rest ? — it is " when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven with his mighty angels. "o Is it salvation ? — in numerous instances it is described, " as ready to be revealed in the last time."V " Finally, the Spirit and the Bride [the universal Church and the Holy Ghost in her,] say, COME. And let him that heareth say. Come," " He which testifieth these things saith, surely I come quickly .-" and one who was in the Spirit responds — " Amen, even so come. Lord Jesus." Rev. xxii. 17, 20. I shall now, by way of shewing the practical tendency of the second Advent, and the consequent importance of this truth to every christian who desires edification, bring forward some of those testimonies, to which I adverted in the former paper, when I pledged myself to show the use which the writers of the New Testament make of it. We have already seen, that they apply it, as the legitimate source of consolation, to those who mourn for the dead ; " that they may not sorrow, as those who have no hope" of seeing their friends return. q W^e have likewise seen an apparent limitation of the reward to them that love his appearing ;^ — ^ 2 Tim. I. 12. 1 Phil. i. 6. ml Cor. xv. 52 ; 1 Thess. iv. 17. n 1 Pet. I. 13. o 2 Thess. i. 7. Pi Pet. i. 5. q 1 Thess. iv. 13—18. r 2 Tim. IV. 8 ; Heb. ix. 28. 20 an application of the subject, wliich, if it be not to be insisted on to its full extent, is nevertheless calculated to awaken heart- searchings. In regard to those passages M-liich remain, I shall, to avoid circumlocution, only quote them at length ; so head- ing them, as to point out the evangelical duties and graces to which they call us, and consequently the practical use made of them. As a call to Repentance, — " Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord, and he shall send Jesus Christy &c." Acts III. 19, 20. to love Christ ; — " If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maran-atha;" which, being interpreted, is, " Let him be accursed — our Lord cometh." 1 Cor. xvi. 22. to love one another ; — " And the Lord make you to increase and abound in love toward one another, and toward all men, even as we do toward you : to the end He may stablish your hearts unblameable in holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ ivith all his saints." 1 Thess. iii. 13. to the mortification of earthly lusts ; — " When Christ, who is our Hie, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory. Mortify therefore your mem- bers which are upon the earth ; fornication, uncleanness, in- ordinate aiFection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness which is idolatry ;" &c. Col. iii. 4, 5. "The grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men, teaching us — that denying ungodliness and un- worldly lusts, we should live soberly, righteously, and godly, in this present evil world ; looking for that blessed hope, [even'] the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour, Jesus Christ." Titus ii. 11—13. to general Obedience 8f Holiness ; — " For the Son of Man shall come in the glory of his Father, with his angels ; and then he shall reward every man accord- ing to his works." Matt. xvi. 27. " And now, little children, abide in him, that, ivhen he shall appear, we may have confidence, and not be ashamed before hjm at his coming." 1 John ii, 28. " We know that when He shall appear we shall be like him ; 21 for we shall see him as He is. And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself even as He is pure." Ibid iii. 2, 3. " Behold, / come quickly ; and my reward is with me, to o-ive every man according as his work shall be." Rev. xxii. 12. to Spirituality of mind ; — *' For our conversation is in heaven ; from whence also we look for the Saviour, the Lord Jesus Christ ; who shall change our vile body, &c. Phil. in. 20, 21. to Works of mercy ; — " When the Son of Man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his fflory ; and before him shall be gathered all nations ; and he shall divide them one from another as a shepherd divides his sheep from the goats. And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand. Come ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world : for I was hungry, and ye gave me meat ; I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink ; I was a stranger, and ye took me in ; naked, and ye clothed me ; I was sick, and ye visited me ; I was in prison, and ye came unto me." Matt. XXV. 31—36. to Watchfulness ; — " Watch therefore ; for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come. But know this, that if the good man of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to have been broken up. Therefore, be ye also ready ; for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of Man comethJ" Matt. xxiv. 42, 44. " Watch therefore : for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of Man cometh." Matt. xxv. 13. " Let your loins be girded about, and your lights burning, and ye yourselves like unto men that wait for their lord, when he will return from the wedding ; that when he cometh and knocketh they may open to him immediately. Blessed are those servants whom the Lord ichen he cometh shall find watching." Luke xii. 35, 37. •' Behold / come as a thief : blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame." Rev. xvi. 15. " But ye brethren are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief : ye are all the children of light and of 22 the day : we are not of niglit, nor of darkness. Therefore let us not sleep as do others : but let us watch and be sober." 1 Thess V. 4, 6. "Behold, I come quickly : blessed is he that keepeth the sayings of the prophecy of this Book." Rev. xxii. 7. to Patience and Long-svffering ; — " And shall not God avenge his own elect, which cry day and night unto him, though he bear long with them }'^ I tell you that he will avenge them speedily. Nevertheless, when the Son of Man cometh, shall he find faith on the earth?" Luke xviiT. 7, 8. " We ourselves glory in you in the churches of God, for your patience and faith in all your persecutions and tribula- tions that ye endure ; which is a manifest token of the right- eous judgement of God, that ye may be counted worthy of the kingdom of God, for which ye also suffer : seeing it is a righteous thing with God to recompense tribulation to them that trouble you ; and to you who are troubled rest with us, when the Lord Jesus shall he revealed from heaven, &c." 2 Thess. I. 4—7. " For ye have need of patience, that, after ye have done the will of God, ye might receive the promise : for yet a little while and He that shall come will come and will not tarrv." Heb. X. 36, 37. " Be patient, therefore, brethren, unto the coming of the Lord. Behold, the husbandman waiteth for the precious fiiiit of the earth, and hath long patience for it, until he receive the early and latter rain. Be ye also patient — stablish your hearts — for the coming of the Lord draiceth nigh." James v. 7, 8. " "Wherein (in the salvation ready to be revealed in the last time) ye greatly rejoice, though now for a season, if need be, ye are in heaviness through manifold temptations ; that the trial of your faith, being much more precious than of gold that perisheth, though it be tried with fire, might be found unto praise and honour and glorv at the appearing of Jesus Christ." 1 Pet. i. 6, 7. * This text may be explained by 2 Pet. ii. 9, 15, " The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness ; but is lo7iff- suffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance." — "Account the loug-euffcriug of the Lord salvation." 23 " Beloved, tliink it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you, as though some strange thing happened unto vou ; but rejoice, inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ's sufferings ; that when his glory shall he revealed, ye may be glad also ^vith exceeding joy." 1 Pet. iv. 12, 13. to Moderation and Sohrietij ; — " Let your moderation be kno^vn unto all men : the Lord is at hand" Phil. iv. 5. " Gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ" 1 Pet. i. 13. to ministerial Fidelity and Diligence. " Who is a faithful and Avise ser^^ant, whom his lord hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due sea- son .'' Blessed is that servant whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing." Matt. xxiv. 46. ** For what is our hope, or joy, or crown of rejoicing ? Are not even ye, in the presence of our Lord Jesus Christ, at his coming?" 1 Thess, ii. 19. " I give thee charge in the sight of God, who quickeneth all things ; and before Jesus Christ, who before Pontius Pilate witnessed a good confession ; that thou keep this command- ment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lo7'd Jesus Christ." 1 Tim. vi. 13, 14. " I charge thee therefore before God, and the Lord Jesus Christ, who shall judge the quick and the dead at his appear- ing and his kingdom ; preach the word ; be instant in season, out of season ; reprove, rebuke, exhort, with all long suffering and doctrine." 2 Tim. iv. 1, 2. " The elders which are among you I exhort, who am also an elder, and a witness of the sufferings of Christ, and also a partaker of the glory that shall be revealed : feed the flock of God which is among you ; taking the oversight thereof, not by constraint, but willingly ; not for filthy lucre, but of a ready mind ; neither as lords over God's heritage, but being ensamples to the flock: and ivhen the chief Shepherd shall appear, ye shall receive a crown of glory that fadeth not away." 1 Peter v. 1 — 4. Against censorious Judgment. " Therefore judge nothing before the time, until the Lord come, &c." 1 Cor. iv. 5. 24 I resei-ve those passages which practically improve the doc- trine of the Resurrection of the saints, until I come to treat more fully on that subject : in the mean while I earnestly beseech the Reader, especially if he be a minister, dispassion- ately to consider what has been already advanced. It may be that in regard to some five or six texts, he may differ from me, as to their interpretation and consequent pertinence : but the great mass of evidence is such, as I am persuaded cannot be successfully controverted. I would therefore humbly but seriously ask, Is the general tone or style of preaching consistent with these extracts ? Has not the wisdom of man substituted its own invention for the ^^dsdom of God ? I grant that to the natural man an object of sense will always appear better suited to exercise a practical influence, than an object of faith ; and therefore, to press home upon the thoughtless the certainty of death, of the truth of which event they have daily evidence, will seem a more likely method of awakening them, than to plead an Advent and a Resurrection. But to act thus is surely incon- sistent in the spiritual man, who is the minister of a Gospel that especially addresses itself to the eye of faith : and a ministry thus conducted must be proportionably less fruitful, than one which more implicitly relies on what is written. I say not that death is altogether an unscriptural subject of exhortation ; but that it is a truth not to be compared, in regard to its prominency, with the Advent, Resurrection, &c. I must admit, also, that so far as the mere determination of a man's future condition is concerned, the day of his death is virtually to him as the day of resurrection or judgment : but without entering into the proof, that it is not so influential in other respects, it ought to be enough for every christian mind to know, that it is not the Scinpture mode of stating these truths. It may be tolerable as a private opinion, or in the way of additional argument ; but the reverse is acted upon : this private opinion has ejected the testimony of the Spirit from its place in the pulpit ; and the Advent and Resurrection and Kingdom of Christ are degraded to the private station. May the voice of the betrothed spouse of Christ again be heard, crying, with the Spirit, COME ! May those who have the first fruits of the Spirit be found in every instance " groaning within themselves, and waiting for the adoption, — to wit, the redemption of their body /" Abdiel. 25 Essay III. THE KINGDOM OF CHRIST. In proceeding to the more immediate consideration of the Millennium, the circumstance which I shall first notice is the Kingdom, concerning ^Yhich so much is said in the Scrip- tures ; and in regard to which I must beg the patient atten- tion of the Reader, while I endeavour to lead him step by step through what is written respecting it. If our views are not clear upon this point, we shall never arrive at a proper conclusion in regard to other matters. For the view to be taken of the doctrines of the Advent and Kingdom of Christ, and of the Resurrection of the saints, depends not (as some would insist) upon doubtful passages in the Book of Revela- tion ; nor shall I rest my interpretation upon any symbolical or merely figurative texts : but if there are passages in the Word of God, which must be understood in a plain and literal sense, (abating of course that tropical use of words, which is inseparable from ordinary conversation,) to such I shall appeal, and by such I purpose to direct my course. I. I need not occupy time by proving, that the Messiah or Christ, according to the Old Testament Scriptures, was to be a king, as well as prophet and priest ; and tliat in various places, more especially in the Book of Daniel, the said Scrip- tures speak of the dominion and power which should be given him. A slight acquaintance only with the New Testament will likewise satisfy us, that the Jewish mind was prepossess- ed with the notion of a Mng and a kingdom, connected with their Messiah. Thus Nathaniel, when brought to believe in Jesus, confessed, — " Thou art the Son of God ; Thou art the King of Israel. "a Thus, when the Lord exhibited his power by feeding the five thousand, the whole multitude would have taken him by force and made him king, had he not withdrawn from them.b Thus again, when he rode into Jerusalem on the ass, the people cried : " Blessed be the King that cometh in the name of the Lord !" — " Blessed the kingdom of our fa- ther David, that cometh in the name of the Lord."c And what is more to the point, when Christ was accused before a John I. 49. b John vi. 15 c Mark xi. 10 and Luke xix. 38. 26 Pilate for claiming to be a king, he plainly declared that he was a King, and that he expected a kingdom. <^ It must be still more obvious to persons familiar with the New Testament, that it does continually and almost exclu- sively refer the blessings and the glory therein announced to this kingdom. Jesus we are told went about preaching the Gospel (or glad tidings) of the kingdom in all the cities and villages of Judea ; e he sent his disciples to preach the same ; f he spake of the things pertaining to it after his resurrection ; g St. Paul resolves his preaching into the same subject;^ and, in brief, the whole Word of God is called " The Word of the kingdom."'^ Against this part of the statement an objection must be noticed : viz. that " the kingdom of God" and " the kingdom of heaven' are constantly spoken of in Scripture ; but that these cannot mean " the kingdom of the Son of Man," or of " Christ." A comparison however of scripture testimonies will shew, that these expressions all refer to one and the same kingdom. — For instance ; that the kingdom of heaven and the kingdom of God are one and the same, mil be evident from a compari- son of the following parallel passages. St. Matthew says, " Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven ;"k St. Luke says, " Blessed be ye poor, for yours is the kingdom of God.."^ Again St. Matthew says, " It is given unto you to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven :"^ the parallel passage in St. Mark is, " Unto you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of GocL"^ The phrase " kingdom of heaven" is indeed a form of speech peculiar to St. Matthew, and only to be met with in his Gospel : the same thing being invariably called by Mark and Luke " kingdom of God." And even St. Matthew himself uses the two phrases indiscriminately in the following passage : " Verily I say unto you, that a rich man shall hardly enter ' into the kingdom of heaven. And again I say unto you, it * is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than * for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God."^ That the kingdom of God and the kingdom of Ch7'ist are d John XVIII. 36, 37. e Matt. ix. 35. f Luke ix. 2 s Acts i. 3. h Acts XX. 25 ; XXVIII. 23, 31. i Matt. xiii. 19. k Matt. v. 3. 1 Luke VI. 20. m Matt. xiii. 11. " Mark iv. 11. o Matt, xix, 23, 24. 27 the same, will appear from a similar process. Speaking of the Transfiguration, St. Matthew says, *' Verily I say unto * you, there be some standing here which shall not taste of ' death, till they see the So?i of Man coming in his king- ' dom :"P which latter sentence St. Luke has — " till they see the kingdom of God /'q and St. ^Mark — " till they have seen the kingdom of God covie ivith poicer."^ Again, in the parable of the tares, St. Matthew says, " that at the end of the world ' the Son of Man shall send forth his angels, and they shall * gather out of fiis kingdom all things that offend ;" and im- mediately he adds, " then shall the righteous shine forth as ' the sun in the kingdom of their Father /'^ thus making the kingdom of the Father and of the Son of Man the same ; even as St. Paul calls it, " the kingdom of Christ and of God."t* From these various passages I conclude, that only one king- dom is spoken of ; and that if it be sometimes called the king- dom of the Father, it is in regard to His having expressly appointed it to the Son of Man ; even as Jesus says, " I ap- ' point unto you a kingdom, as my Father hath appointed unto wze."u And the object of Christ in that kingdom is to bring all on earth to do his Father's will, even as it is done in heaven ; and then, when he hath thus put all things under his feet, to surrender up the kingdom to God, even the Father,^' I must notice also, in regard to this subject, that divines often speak of the kingdom of grace .- though it is not a scrip- tural expression. Tliis is done by way of distinguishing those passages which refer to the visible church, or present dispensa- tion, during which souls are prepared, by the means of grace and the Holy Spirit, to become meet partakers of the inherit- P Matt. XVI. 28. q Luke ix. 27. r Mark ix. 1. s Matt. xiii. 41, 43. tEphes. v. 5. ^ Luke xxii. 29, 30. v i Cor. xv. 24, 28. * I feel convinced, from a penisal of GranviUe Sharp's Treatise on the use of the definite Article in the Greek New Testament, that the original of this passage, ev ri) j3acn\eia rs Xpirn kcu Qss, should be translated, " In the Kingdom of the Christ and God ;^^ the relative posi- tions of the article and conjunction indicating, that one and the same person is meant. But this, instead of making against my argument, will confirm it : for as it proves that God and Christ are the same ; so, by parity of reasoning, the Kingdom of God and Christ are one. Lac- tantius in his Treatise De Institutionihus, in the seventh book of which he enters at large upon the subject now before us, repeatedly speaks of God and his kingdom, when he evidently intends Christ. 28 ance to which God has called them. Our Lord seems to refer to this dispensation of grace, when he likens the kingdom of heaven to tares growing with the wheat, and to good and bad fish caught in a net. In several other passages it is thus spoken of ;""" and I deem it important to affirm constantl)^ that the glorious kingdom of our God and Saviour can never be enjoyed by any other, than those in whose hearts he now reigns by the Spirit. But though this is an obvious and un- deniable use of the terms " Kingdom of God" and " Kingdom of heaven ;" yet can they only refer, in such case, to an im- perfect or embryo state of it. The great purpose of God in regard to this kingdom is the manifestation of the power, glory, and sovereignty of Christ, in such manner as that all flesh shall visibly behold it, whilst the righteous shall shine forth in it like the sun.^ It is to this manifestation of the kingdom, (which is called its " coming with ;jo2<7cr,"y) that the great majority of those passages seem to refer which spealt of the kingdom ; and to which all are subordinate : and, cer- tainly, those Scriptures which advert to it as yet future, must at least refer to a dispensation different from the present."^ We may imperfectly illustrate these two conditions of the Kingdom by tlie case of a prince in exile, who is nevertheless making formidable preparations to assert and vindicate his rights. The king, thougli not enthroned, is acknowledged by many partisans ; over these he already rules, and these he re- ceives under his protection : but he is not yet acknowledged by the nations over which he claims sovereignty ; and he waits for the time when they shall say, like Judah to David, " Return thou and all thy servants. "^ II. I next proceed to inquire concerning the time when this Kingdom may be properly said to have been set up ; a right apprehension of which will materially assist our determination of other points. 1. Many consider the kingdom of God to be His now reign- ing by his power and providence, — over-ruling so much of the * Since I wrote this, the translation of a Treatise on the same sub- ject by Koppe has appeared in the Investigator ; Vol. II, p. 207. It is ably and impartially written, as regards the question of the personal reign ; and fully bears out the statement I have advanced. w See for example. Matt. xxi. 43 ; Mark xii. 34 ; Luke x. 9, 11 ; XI. 20. X Matt. xm. 43. Y See Mark ix. 1, 2 ; and 2 Pet. i. 16. I 2 Sam. XIX. 9—14. 29 wrath of ungodly men, as he suffers to escape, and restraining the remainder of it. Thus, say they, the Jews unconsciously obeyed, even when crucifying Jesus ; whereof the Holy Ghost cries in anticipation, " Why do the heathen rage and the peo- ' pie imagine a vain thing ? yet have I set my King upon my ' holy hill of Zion."^ Now it must be admitted, as beyond dispute by those who believe the Scriptures, " that the Alost High ruleth in the kingdom of men;" " and that God is the governor among the nations :"^ but if this be the kingdom intended, it was set up at the creation of the world ; for there never was a period since the creation, in which God has not thus ruled and over-ruled mankind. But the Kingdom of which I am speaking Vv'as the subject of promise, certainly as late as the time of Daniel ;c a circumstance 'quite incompati- ble with its existence then and previously. 2. Neither could it have been set up at any period between the time of Daniel and our Lord's incarnation : for it is the Son of Man to whom, according to Daniel, ^^ the dominion is given ; and it is imiDossible he can have reigned as man, be- fore he was made man. That the Kingdom and glory to be manifested are espe- cially assigned over to him as max, is evident from other scripture testimonies. In Corinthians, the Apostle says of him, " that God hath put all things under his feet :"e which saying is indeed a quotation (as also Hebrews ii. 5 — 8) of Psalm viii ; wherein he is thus spoken of, — "" What is man ' that thou art mindful of him ? or the Son of Man that thou * visitest him ? Thou madest him a little lower [or for a little ' iL'hile lower] than the angels ; Thou crownedst him v/ith ' glory and honor, a.-d didst set him over the v/orks of thine * hand : Thou hast put all things in subjection under his feet." Thus Jesus declared, " that authority was given to him to ' execute judgment also, because he was the Son of Man."^ And St. Paul affirms, " that God hath given to him (on ac- * count of his obedience and humiliation in the flesh) a Name, ' which is above every name ; that at the name of JESUS ' everv^ knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in ' earth, and things under the earth."? He who thought it not robbery to be equal with God, must have previously pos- a Psalm II. \—C), b Psalm xxii. 28 ; Dan. iv. 17. <^ Dan. vii. d Chap. VII. 13, 14. eiCor. XV. 27. fJohnv. 27. P Phil. ii. 9— 11. 30 sessed that sovereignty of tlie universe, which has been men- tioned : but this Kingdom is the reward of the righteous obe- dience and humihation of the Christ ; in consequence of which the Father hath determined for a while to make manifest his own glory in him, and to put all things under him ; He only being excepted, who thus puts all under him.l^'^ 3. A more common notion in regard to the kingdom is, that it was set up at the birth of Jesus : for indeed it is writ- ten, "Where is he that is horn king of the Jews." Some- thing may be conceded to this opinion, in regard to that Gospel and means of grace so soon afterwards pro'vided ; which, as I have before observed, is called by divines the king- dom of grace : but, surely, if the acknowledgement of au- thority, and if obedience to authority, be essential to the honor and reality of dominion, the kingdom was not set up then. Who can name the nation, which acknowledged the Lord as king at the time of his first appearing ? Even the Jews did not acknowledge him : " He came to his own, but his own received him not !" They declared that they would not have this man to rule over them ; and insisting, that they had no king but Caesar, they crucified the Lord of glory !" t 1 Cor. XV. 27, 28. * It is to be regretted, that, owing to an excessive jealousy, the Jiu- manity of Christ is not so much meditated on by Christians as it ought to be ; though the consideration thereof, as also of his godhead, is full of comfort to the soul. The Unitarians, looking too exclusively on those texts which speak of Christ's humanity, have invented a system which shuts out his deity ; and thus they have " denied the Lord that bought them." But Christians fi-equently go to an opposite extreme, and by viewing Jesus exclusively as God, they are sometimes led practi- cally to deny, that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh. It is a most wonderful and edifying truth to ponder in the heart, that a max is now exalted far above thrones, and principalities, and powers ! Yet there are some who neglect and fear to speak of Jesus as man ; — as though they considered it would degrade Him so to do. Numbers would set him down as a Socinian, who, upon his first preaching to a people who had never heard of Christ, should speak of Him as " that man, whom God hath ordained to judge the world in righteousness :" yet this is no more than what St. Paul did at Athens, (Acts xvii, 31.) I hope the Reader will pardon this digression, from one heartily believing in his Lord as God ; and as heartily denying the sinfulness of his humanity. But a right apprehension of Jesus, as * very man,'' will lead us to a more cor- rect understanding of those Scriptures which speak of His Kingdom ; and especially one Scripture, (1 Cor. xv, 24.) which cannot be well ex- plained without it. 31 Louis XVI had the legitimate title to the kingdom of France when he was guillotined ; and there were also individuals, who adhered to him among the people : but it is extravagant to sav, that he was in possession of the kingdom, when the nation disowned and executed him. When Christ's kingdom shall be set up, it shall be of such a character, as that none can mistake, that the Lord is ruler in it — " His glory shall be openly shewed in the sight of the heathen." But Isaiah tes- tifies of the adversaries of the Lord, " Thou never barest rule over them ; they were not called by thy name :" and of the Lord he says, in respect to his first advent, that he is to be " a servant of rulers. "i Indeed our Lord himself spake a parable, because some then thought that the kingdom of God was immediately to appear, in which he compares himself to a man, who had first to go into a far country .J To which I will only add, that the very prayer which he taught his dis- ciples proves, that the kingdom was then future ; for he directs them to pray, " Thy kingdom come." 4. The parable just adverted to might be sufficient to prove further, that the kingdom did not commence immediately after the ascension of Christ : which many do nevertheless suppose ; and likewise that the saints do now enjoy the kingdom and reign with him. — " Would to God (saith the Apostle) that ye did reign, that we also might reign with you."^^ It is necessary however to consider here the present con- dition of our Lord Jesus. I cannot dispute, that He is now glorified; that He is seated on the right hand of the Majesty on high ; that the principaUties and powers in heavenly places are subject to him ; and that he reigns as the Mediator, Ad- vocate, and Saviour of his people. But I must repeat, that this is not that glory nor that reign, which are the special subjects of promise both to him and his saints. If those pas- sages in Revelation (chap. v. 10, and vi. 9 — 11,) refer to the state of the redeemed Church in heaven, it is manifest, that theirs is a state of expectation, in which they look for the time when they " shall reign ;" and, therefore, that they are not now reigning with their Lord. In the same Book the Lord clearly distinguishes between that throne on which he is now seated, and the throne on which he shall hereafter be mani- fested : "To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me ^ Isaiah XLix. 7 \ lxiii. 19. J Luke xix. 11. k 1 Cor. iv. 8. 1 Rev. III. 21, 32 ' in my throne ; even as I also overcame, and am set down ' with my Father in his throne. "^ In the Gospel of St. John also he seems to distinguish between his own divine glory w^hich he had before the world was ; (xvii. 5,) and that glory, which God has given to him as Messiah, and which he gives unto his people, (v. 22.) Certainly his condition, as regards the promised kingdom, is also one of expectation ;ki for he waits for the time when his enemies shall become his foot- stool, and it shall be said, " Rule Thou in the midst of them." I must return again to the statement, that the reign of Christ with his saints must be of an acknowledged and mani- fest character : and in what part of the globe is that the case even now ? By far the largest part of the world is still hea- then in name : and over that part even, which surnames itself w^ith the name of Christ, he cannot be said to bear rule. Even in this country, where religion prevails perhaps as much as in any other, our laws are rarely framed and administered in the fear of Christ : to say nothing of the great majority of individuals, who live in disobedience : — who openly deny his divinity, his power, his authority, his laws, his people ! It is degrading to the Lord Jesus to call this his dominion over the nations ! There is no king among men but would deem it quite incompatible with his honor, to allow any to despise his laws, or to live in habitual rebellion. And shall the Man who is made God's fellow, — shall the King of kings and Lord of lords, — only rule over a few, who are despised and per- secuted for their obedience ? No : when he takes up his iron rod, he will dash his enemies to atoms as a potter's vessel ; — ■ then he shall have the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heaven ;"ii — then " all kings shall fall down before him, and all nations shall serve him ;"o — " all the ends of ' the world shall remember and turn unto the Lord, and all ' the kindreds of the nations shall worship before him;"P — " as I live saith the Lord every knee shall bow to me, and ' EVERY tongue shall confess to God."P* m Heb. X. 13. "Dan. vii. 27. « Psalm lxxii. 11. P Psalm xxii. 27. q Isaiah xlv. 23 ; Rom. xiv. 11. * I might here avail myself of an important argiiment from Daniel to shew, that the setting up of this kingdom (by which I mean its visible commencement) must be future ; but as it is based upon the interpreta- tion of a symbolical passage of Scripture, which may, of course, be questioned, I do not insist on it. Nevertheless, I mention it for the 33 "We have further evidence, that the period of the manifesta- tion of this kingdom is 3'et future, by a comparison of a pas- sage in the first Epistle to the Corinthians with one in He- brews. In the former it is declared of Christ, " that all things shall be put under Him:"i' in the latter the Apostle notices, " that we see not yet all things put under him :"3 whence we must conclude, that his kingdom is not yet come. In another part of the same chapter in Corinthians he says, •* W\?it fie sh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God ; but that we must first have our immortal and incorruptible body."* There are other Scriptures equally tending to show, that the kingdom did not commence at the Ascension ; for in the very hour of his ascension Christ was asked by his disciples, if he would at that time restore the kingdom to Israel ; and his reply plainly leads to the inference, that it was not to com- mence at that period ; but that they were to be witnesses of him to the uttermost parts of the earth :^ just as in another place he declares, that the Gospel of the kingdom must first r 1 Cor. XV. 27. s Heb. ii. 8. t ^v. 50, 53. u Acts i. 6—^. consideration of those who agree in the general correctness of the expo- sitions of commentators, in regard to the meaning of the image seen by Nebuchadnezzar, Dan. ii, 31 — 45, The stone cut out without hands, which smites the image and then becomes a great mountain and fills the earth, is usually interpreted to signify Messiah's kingdom ; which, ac- cording to the notions of some, smote the image at the establishment of Christianity. But such a view does in no way accord with the descrip- tion given. For, 1st, the smiting is destructive, even to annihilation"; " no place is found for it:" (», 35 ;) whereas the Roman or fourth monarchy, symbolised by the legs and feet of the image, has, in some shape or other, continued ever since, 2dly. The stone smites the image on the feet ; (v. 34,) the toes of which signify the ten kingdoms, into which Rome was divided. These must therefore be in existence at the period of attack : whereas they existed not until after the days of Con- stantine. 3dly. The whole four monarchies, symbolised by the gold, silver, brass, iron, &c. must, in some way or other, be upon the stage together, each in an independent form ; both when the smiting takes place, and when the God of heaven sets up his kingdom. (Compare verses 25 and 44.) This was not the case at the first coming of Christ, neither in the time of Constantine, nor at any period since. There ap- pears indeed a probability of the thing occurring now : Persia has all along been preserved ; the power which holds Euphrates has long since become independent ; and the Greek monarchy is reviving. 4thly. No sooner does the stone smite the image, than these kingdoms are suc- ceeded by the fifth monarchy solely — a state of things never yet wi*-ness- ed, and which can only come to pass after the destruction of Antichrist. 34 be preached in all nations for a testimony unto them.v The apostle Paul exhorted the Thessalonians " to walk worthy of God, who had called them to his kingdom and glory;" and — to walk, so as that they might be accounted worthy of the kingdom of God for which they suffered ;"^' and James speaks of believers, " as being heirs of the kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him :"x all which passages imply, that the kingdom was yet future, when they were ministering. And, finally, the words of Jesus to Pilate (as I apprehend them) completely set this point at rest : " My kingdom is not of this world. "y^ Satan is " the prince of this world ;" and has a kingdom in it at variance with our Lord's. z Which kingdom is now set up must be judged of, not by inquiring into the respective jmwer of the princes of each kingdom ; but into the prevalence of the jji'inciples of each. No doubt will then remain, that Satan still rules. We know that there is one stronger than the strong man armed, who could at any time put out his power to bruise his adversary under his feet ; and even noiv he proves himself greater in the hearts of his people, than he that is in the world. Yea, when he was on V Matt. XXIV. 14. w 1 Thess, ii. 12 ; 2 Thess. i. 5. x James ii. 5. y John XVIII. 36. z Luke xi. 18 ; John xiv. 30. * In a question of this kind, which concerns tlie universal Church, the doctrine held in any one individual church cannot be with propi-iety advanced in the way of argument. As most however who are members of the Church of England admire her, because, among other things, she speaks on many controverted points in the generalized language of Scrip- ture, it may be interesting to such to notice, how, in all her offices, she speaks of the kingdom &% future : — At Baptism the prayer for the neophyte is : " ihdit finally , with the * residue of thy Church, he may be an inheritor of thine everlasting * kingdom." At Confirmation the bishop prays : ** Defend, O Lord, this thy * child, &c. may he daily increase in thy Spirit more and more, until he ' come unto thy everlasting kingdom." At the Communion we pray for grace to follow the good example of those departed this life, " that with them we may be partakers of thy * heavenly kingdom." At Matrimony the prayer for the newly married couple is : ** Grant * them to inherit thine everlasting kingdom." And in the Burial service the prayer is : " That it may please Thee ' of thy gracious goodness shortly to accomplish the number of thine * elect and to hasten thy kingdom:'''' — a testimony quite decided, as re- spects the point I am aiming at. 35 earth, he gave some strikmg and open indications of his future kingly power ; as when he cleansed the temple, ruled the elements, forbad the devils to speak, &c. Nevertheless, the time is not yet arrived when this kingdom is to shine forth in splendor ; we still have to wrestle, not only with flesh and blood, " but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual v\icked- ness in high places : wherefore (Reader) " take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all to stand. "a III. Let us now inquire, at what particular time this king- dom shall appear ; which 1 infer to be at the second advent of the Lord Jesus. For, first, the Apostle informs us, when describing the order of the resurrection, that those that are Christ's shall at his coming be raised : and then follows the end, when he shall deliver up the kingdom.^ Now there must be some period of time in which the saints shall possess the kingdom and the Lord shall reign. — We have seen, that this period cannot be in the present dispensation ; and after the advent, which closes this dispensation, is to follow ' the end,' when he shall HAVE REiGXED. The interval therefore must be between the advent and that resigning of the kingdom unto God, who shall then be all in all. This period I shall call the millennial dis- pensation ; and endeavour at least to prove, that at the Lord's coming is the manifestation of his kingdom. Jesus tells us, " When the Son of Man shall come in his ' glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit ' upon the throne of his glory." And further on he adds, " Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, come * ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for * you from the beginning of the world. "c From these Scrip- tures it is evident, that Jesus will then, (let the time be when it may,) be j^^rsonalli/ on the throne of his glory ; and that the saints will only then receive the kingdom. Hebrews i. 6 is, in the original, " And when He bring eth ' again the first begotten into the world. He saith, and let all * the angels of God worship him :"* which refers to his com- ing a second time into the world. a Ephes, VI. 12, 13. b i Cor. xv. 23, 24. c Matt. xxv. 31, 34. * Not TTciXiv de OTciv, but orav ce ttciXiv, &c. 36 In St. Luke's gospel the Lord describes the signs which shall terminate the times of the Gentiles, and usher in the coming of the Son of Man with power and great glory ; upon which, when they see them come to pass, they are to under- stand, that their redemption and the kingdom of God are nigh at hand." Here we know, likewise, he did sojourn, when in the flesh, loving more especially to retire to that part of it called ' the Mount of Olives,' — where was ' the garden ; ' from whence also he took his departure on a cloud ; and where he will again descend ; as it is written, " His feet ' shall stand in that day upon the Mount of Olives, which is ' before Jerusalem on the east, and the Mount of Olives shall ' cleave in the midst thereof towards the east and towards the * west ; and half of the mountain shall remove toward the ' north, and half of it toward the south. And ye shall flee to ' the valley of the mountains ; for the valley of the moun- * tains shall reach unto Azal ; yea, ye shall flee, like as ye * fled before the earthquake, in the days of Uzziah king of / Judah : and the Lord my God shall come, and all the * SAixTS WITH THEE."i What cau be more explicit than this prophecy ? Mr. Faber, who does not concur with me in the view of the personal reign, admits, nevertheless, of this pro- phecy, that it must be literal, " and designed, by its circum- stantial clearness, to cut oflF the possibility of figurative inter- pretation."!^ And immediately after this prophecy it is added — " And the Lord shall be King over all the ecwth"^ — proving most decidedly, when the kingdom v/ill be manifest; (viz. at his coming with the saints, before named;) and where, viz. on earth. Many other Scriptures prove that the Lord's kingdom is to be manifested on earth : for example, Jer. xxiii. 5, — " A king shall reign and prosper, and shall execute judgement and jus- tice in the earth." Again, Ezek. xliii. 7, when the Lord, on granting to him a vision of Jerusalem, says, — " Son of man, the 2}lace of my throne, and the j^lace of the soles of my feet." Wherefore our Lord forbids his disciples to swear by Jerusa- y Zecli. II. 12. =" Hosea ix. 3. a Isaiah viii. 8. ^ Ps, lxxxvii. 3. C Ps. LXVIII. 1.1. d Ps. LXXVIII. 68. t^ Ps. L. f Ps. cxxxii. 14. g Ps. Lxxiv. 2, 3. h Acts I. 9—11 ; Rev. i. 7. » Zech. xiv. 4, 5. k Vol. vii. p. 267. > Zech. xiv. 1). 51 lem, because it is the city of the great king.i^i Nor must I omit to notice, when speaking of the throne, that Isaiah says : " Of the increase of his government there shall be no end, ' upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom. "ii Thus the angel Gabriel announces to Alary ; — " He shall be great, * and shall be called the Son of the Highest ; and the Lord ' God shall give unto him the throne of his father David. "o And where was the throne of David ? surely not in heaven ; for St. Peter tells us plainly, " that David is not ascended into ' the heavens /' but that, " being a prophet, he knew that God ' had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, ' according to the flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his ' throne."? The Lord, however, certainly did not sit on Da- vid's throne at his first coming ; for Herod was then in it : and this promise therefore remedns to be fulfilled at his second coming, 2. It is now time that I should notice an objection, which it will be useful to consider, not merely in reference to this particular argument, but likewise as affecting in some measure general principles of interpretation. There are passages of Scripture, relating to this matter, Avhich are luidoubtedly to be understood only in a spiritual sense, and must be so interpreted. Such, for example, as when St. Paul sa5's of gentile believers, " that they are fel- ' low citizens with the saints, and of the household of God, ' and are built upon the foundation of the Apostles and Pro- * phets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone ; in ' whom all the building fitly framed together groweth unto a * holt/ temple in the Lord ; in whom ye also are builded toge- ' ther for a habitation of God through the Spirit. "q And St. Peter also, speaking of Christ as of * a living stone,' adds, '• Ye also are built up a spiritual house." Persons who do not consider, that such a spiritual view is reconcileable wdtli other texts, which must, for reasons equally manifest, be literal, at once conclude, that every reference to the house, or city, or mount of God must be figurative : just as some others, collecting a few passages, the nature of which is unquestionably literal, thence conclude that none are figura- tive. There are passages, which speak of a spiritual resurrec- m Matt. V. 35. n Isa. ix. 7. o Luke i. 32. P Acts ii. 30, 34. &c. q Ephes. II. 19—22. 52 tioUi relating to the raising of the soul from the death of sin, unto the life of righteousness ; whence believers are said to be already risen with Christ : ^ but we must not thence conclude that there is not a bodilj/ resurrection revealed also. The spi- ritual resurrection is the pledge and earnest of the bodily one, rendering it more sure ; just as things which are first literally fulfilled, are pledges of the like spiritual things. It was the exclusive consideration of such Scriptures that caused many among the Corinthians to err, supposing the spiritual resur- rection to be the JiJ^st resurrection promised, and therefore that it had taken place : which opinion is apparently the very one St. Paul denies and combats, in the fifteenth chapter of his first Epistle to them ; wherein he insists, that their faith was vain were this the case. Prophetic Scripture, and all Scripture, must be judged of by its context and general scope. For example, when it speaks of a man, we understand a being who possesses a spiritual soul, dwelling in a mortal body. The chief commands and promises of Scripture are addressed to his spiritual part ; but that does not prove, that the soul will not hereafter be mani- fested in a body, any more than it proves, that it is not now in the body. When therefore we use the word soul for man, we include his body as a matter of course. For who would suppose, because it is written, '' that Abram took Sarai, and ' Lot his brother's son, and all their substance that they had ' gathered, and the souls that they had gotten in Haran, and * they went forth to go into the land of Canaan ;"s — who, I say, would conclude, that they took only the spirits of these persons, and left their bodies behind ? And who again, be- ' cause St. Paul exhorts the brethren to present their bodies a living sacrifice unto God, t would suppose that he does not include the soul ; without which they would be a dead, and not a living, sacrifice r Now apply this principle to the house of God, — which we have seen is the city, the New Jerusalem, the holy mountain. A city is, strictly speaking, a number of persons dwelling to- gether under certain laws and immunities. Whether they dwell in tents, in ceiled houses, or have the sky only as their canop}" is indifferent : houses come to be called the city, only because they are the place of abode of the citizens ; just as r Rom. VI. 1, 5 ; Col. in. 1. s Gen. xii. 5. t Rom. xii. 1. 53 we call a pile of stones a church, because the real Church of God are presumed to assemble in it. The houses are nomore a city when without inhabitants, than a body is a man when the spirit is fled : both are their ruins only. Thus it is writ- ten — " Then went out to him Jerusalem, &.c. and were bap- tized of him in Jordan" — which evidently means the in- habitants of Jerusalem ; and when therefore a city is said to be preparing in heaven, the saints must be intended, who are destined to form it, and are now called " Jeru- salem which is above /' and which is the same Jerusalem which it is said shall " come dotvn — from God — out of heaven."^ But because they are the real city — the lively stones — it does not follow therefore that they are to have no place of manifestation : on the contrary, there must be some place of visible dwelling if they come in the body, whatever the nature of that place may be. Those who can see nothing but figure in Scripture are compelled to explain, that the great city, the holy Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven, signifies the ascent of the saints into heaven. But this is not only a perversion of language, but a perversion of figure. The scrip- ture figures are remarkable for their appropriate significancy ; whereas in this case they would be remarkable, as meaning the very reverse of what they seemed to describe. It may clear this point to observe further, that there are texts which beyond question refer to a material city, so far as literal language can express it ; and yet they primarily aim at the persons who compose such cities, without which they would have no meaning. For instance, — " Then began he ' to upbraid the cities wherein most of his mighty works ' were done, because they repented not. Woe unto thee, Cho- ' razin," &c.v '• And when he was come near he beheld the ' city and wept over it saying, if thou hadst known," &c.^ It is here evident that it was the material city — the pile of stones with its towers and domes, which first caught the eye of Jesus ; and he appears only to address this mass of mate- rials. But any man of understanding must be aware, that it was the inhabitants of Chorazin, &c. against whom he pro- nounced the woe ; and the inhabitants of Jerusalem over whom he wept. It was her " children" whom he would have ga- thered : but the one part is included in the other. u Rev. XXI. 2. V Matt. xi. 20—24. w Luke xix. 41. 54 Thus am I led to conclude, when Daniel, on ** presenting his supplications for the holy mountain of his God," couples together the following phrases — '* thy city Jerusalem, thy holy mountain ;" — " Jerusalem, even thy people " — " thy city, even thy people,* are called by Thy Name,"^ — that these terms are in the first place explanatory of each other ; and, secondly, that there is a reference in them, both to the house- hold of God, and to the jjlace of their congregating and future manifestation. So in the following passage, " Remember thy * congregation, which thou hast purchased of old ; the rod of ' thine inheritance, which thou hast redeemed- this mount ' Zion, wherein thou hast dwelt ;"y mount Zion and the con- gregation are made as one by implication ; whilst yet the con- text shews, that Zion literally, as well as the congregation, are both distinctly referred to. I add here some texts, shewing the practical use, which the Apostles made of the doctrine of the Kingdom and Inhe- ritance to be manifested on the earth. I could greatly increase the list were I to turn to the Old Testament; (particularly in reference to the land, the promise of which, in one Psalm only,z is practically applied six dilFerent times ;) but, for obvious reasons, I prefer keeping at present to the New Tes- tament. Grounded then on these truths are Exhortations to Repentance. " And saying. Repent ye : for the kingdom of heaven is at hand." Matt. in. 1. " Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God ? Be not deceived : neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor abusers of themselves with man- kind, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God." 1 Cor. VI. 9, 10. " Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these ; adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, idol- atry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulation, wrath, strife, sedition, heresies, envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like : of the which I tell you before, as I have also X Dan. IX. 16—20. y Ps. lxxiv. 2. z Ps. xxxvii. * In both these instances, I take the vau of the Hebrew, and the Kai of the Septuagint necessarily to mean even, (as they often do,) not and. 55 told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God," Gal. v. 19 — 21. " For this ye knovr, that no whoremonger, nor unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, hath any inhe- ritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God." Ephes. v. 5. to Holiness and to seek Grace. " Verily, verily, I say unto thee. Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." John iii. 3. Verily, verily, I say unto thee. Except a man be born of water, and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God." John iii. 5. " Wherefore we, receiving a kingdom which cannot be moved, let us have grace, whereby we may serve God accept- ably, with reverence and godly fear." Heb. xii. 28. Particular Graces excited. Obedience to God, " Not every one that saith unto me. Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven ; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven." Matt. vii. 21. Obedience to Parents, " Children, obey your parents in the Lord : for this is right. Honour thy father and thy mother ; (for this is the first commandment with promise ;) that it may be well with thee, and thou may est live long on the earth." Ephes. vi. 1—3. Humiliti/, " Blessed are the poor in Spirit; for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." Matt. v. 3. " Hearken, my beloved brethren ; Hath not God chosen the poor of this world, rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which he hath jjromised to them that love him } But ye have despised the poor." James ii. 5, 6. Meekness, " Blessed are the meek : for they shall inherit the earth." Matt. V. 5. Patience, " Blessed are they which are persecuted for righteousness' sake : for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." Matt. v. 10. " These all died in faith, not having received the promises, but having seen them afar off, and were persuaded of them, and embraced them, and confessed that they were strangers 56 and pilgrims on the earth. For they that say such things declare plainly, that they seek a country." (iraTpiha.) Heb. XI. 13, 14. " Let us go forth therefore unto him without the camp, bearing his reproach. For here we have no continuing citj/t but we seek one to come." Heb. xiii. 12, 14. " Fear not, little flock ; for it is your Father's good plea- sure to give you the kingdom." Luke xii. 32. Perseverance, " He that overcometh shall inherit all things ; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son." Rev. xxi. 7. Diligence, " Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness. Wherefore, beloved, seeing that ye look for such things, be diligent that ye may be found of him in peace, without spot, and blameless." 2 Pet. in. 13, 14. General Holy Walking, " Ye were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise, which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the pur- chased possession, unto the praise of his glory." — " Grieve not [therefore] the Holy Spirit of God, whereby ye are sealed unto the day of redemption." Ephes. i. 13, 14 ; and iv. 30. " Walk worthy of God, who hath called you unto His kingdom and glory ." 1 Thess. ii. 12. Thankfulness, " Giving thanks unto the Father, which hath made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance of the saints in light : who hath delivered us from the power of darkness, and hath translated us into the kingdom of his dear Son." Col. i. 12, 13. Prayer. " And he said unto them, when ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven. Hallowed be thy Name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth." Luke XI. 2. NOTE, that almost the whole of these texts, by making the kingdom and inheritance the subjects of promise, do likewise expressly make them /?/^Mr^. Abdiel. 57 Essay V. THE PARTICIPATION OF THE SAINTS. Tliough much of the evidence brought to bear on the points which have now been considered, must already have led to the conclusion, that the saints in general will participate in the glorious state of things to be revealed in the Millennium ; yet I consider it to be a matter of so much importance and interest to the Church, that I have reserv^ed many Scripture testimonies for the purpose of pro\Tbig it more distinctly ; which testimonies will likemse further corroborate the view I have taken of the Kingdom of the Son of Man. I proceed therefore to shew, that the promises of this glory belong equally to the saints of the Old and New Testaments, and of every age of the Church. I. This point is the more necessary to be insisted on, be- cause there are many, who, whilst they admit a Millennium of glory on earth, confine it nevertheless to a portion only of the Church of God. Some, for instance, limit it to the Jews; some to those only who have suffered martyrdom for Clu-ist ; and some to that generation only, who shall be living at the commencement of the Millennium, excluding all the departed saints, and the Lord Jesus himself, from any visible participa- tion. I conclude, however, that the whole of the saints, from the da^/s of the first Adam up to the period of the glorious advent of the second Adam, will together enjoy their resur- rection glory at the beginning of the Millennium ; and that their glory is altogether distinct from the condition of that portion of Israel, who will then be redeemed in the flesh ; and also from the spiritual state of those gentile nations, who shall then lilie^dse still be in the flesh. I have only to request of the Reader, if cUfficulties and objections present themselves to his mind on the perusal of this statement, that he will at least suspend them, until I have gone through the whole series of Essays in which I am now engaged ; in the course of which it is probable, that some of those difficulties may be removed. I trust it is not necessary to dwell long upon the antediluvian saints : these may be all included in one verse of Jude's Epistle ; — " Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied 58 * to these, saying. Behold the Lord cometh with myriads of * his saints, to execute judgement, &c."a This was therefore the expectation of the Church in Enoch's time. And as re- spects the saints from the time of Noah to Abraham, we may clearly infer their expectation from the eleventh chapter of Hebrews : Noah being instanced, at the seventh verse, as one of those of whom, in the thirty-ninth and following verses, it is said, that they obtained a good report through faith, but received not the promise ; God having designed, that they without us should not be perfected. In regard to the promises to Abraham and to his seed, I have already proved that Christ is "the seed" principally in- tended, and, by a necessary consequence, all those who are his members. This is further evident from the Epistle to the Romans. The Millennarian will not I think deny, that the glory to which the Apostle frequently alludes in this Epistle, is that which is to be revealed at the manifestation of the sons of God, treated of in chapter viii ; and of course the promise spoken of has reference to that glory. Yet in chap. iv. the apostle contends, " that the promise that he should be the heir of the world, was not to Abraham or to his seed through the law, (which has especial respect to the Gentile dispensation,) but through the righteousness of faith. — That it is of faith, that it might be by grace ; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed : not to that only which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham ; who is the father of us all." And again in the ninth chapter he argues, even as respects the seed of Abraham according to the flesh ; " that they are not all Israel who are of Israel ; neither be- * cause they are the seed of Abraham are they all children ; * but in Isaac shall thy seed be called : that is, they which * are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of ' God ; but the children of the promise are counted for the * seed." And afterwards he goes on in the same chapter to argue, that the purpose of God was " to make known the * riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had * afore prepared unto glory, — even us, whom he hath called, * not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles." So also in Galatians : " Know ye therefore, that they which are of * faith, the same are the children of Abraham."'^ And again, a V. 14. TrpoecprjTevffe raroif. b Gal. iii. 7, 59 "• Ye are all the children of God hj faith in Christ Jesus, &c. * there is neither Jew nor Greek, bond nor free, male nor fe- * male ; for ye are all one in Christ Jesus : and if ye be Christ's, ' then are ye Abrahams seed and heirs according to the pro- ' mise."^ When the Church afterwards assumed a still more distinct and separate form in the Israelitish nation, to whom all the promises then appear to be more immediately addressed, I grant that a greater degree of obscurity is throwTi over this circumstance. Nor do I mean to deny, (though we are now enabled clearly to infer the facts above stated,) that in the previous periods the mystery of the fulness of the Gentiles was in great measure hidden : for the Apostle plainly tells us, " that in other ages was 7iot made known unto the sons of ' men, as it is noiv revealed unto the holy apostles and pro- * phets by the Spirit, that the Gentiles should be fellow-heirs, * and of the same body, and partakers of his promise in Christ * by the Gospel. "^ And thus St. Peter, alluding to the pe- riod when the Jews only were the recognised people of God, says to the " strangers" to whom he writes, — "Ye are a chosen ' generation, a royal priesthood ; &c. which in time past were * not a people, but are now the people of God."^ And though some have concluded from certain passages, that strangers and foreigners were not to partake of the same promises with Israel ; yet I apprehend, as far as the resurrection Church is concerned, that these passages do always apply to aliens from the commonwealth of Israel in their unnaturalized and un- proselyted state. This is indeed evident from what is said about the institution of the Passover, one of the most sacred of their ordinances. — " And the Lord said unto Moses and * Aaron, this is the ordinance of the Passover : there shall no * stranger eat thereof, &c." Exod. xii. 43. After which, at verses 48, 49, it is written : " And when a stranger shall so- ' journ with thee, and will keep the passover to the Lord, let * all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near and * keep it ; and he shall be as one horn in the land : but no * uncircumcised person shall eat thereof." In due time, however, the Lord sent forth his Apostles to call those other sheep, which were not] of the Israelitish fold ; but who were to be made one fold under one Shepherd.^ ^ Gal. III. 26—29. d Ephes. m. 5, 6. el Peter ii. 9, 10. f Jolmx. 16. 60 Then ^ve find it openly declared, " that in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but the new creature, and faith which worketh by love ; and that those who thus walk are the Israel of Gocl."S And the Apostle bids us " Remember, that though we are Gentiles in the flesh, who are called rxciRcuMcisiox by the Jews ; being, when without Christ, aliens from the commonwealth of Israel and strangers from the covenant of promise ; we are now by the blood of Christ made ?iicih, he having broken dovra the middle wall of partition, and made of ticain o?ie neiv man, thus making us no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and of the household of God."h Thus, as Abraham is called " the father of us all," so ''Jerusalem which is above" — that Jerusalem '* which shall descend from God out of hea- ven" — is also called " the mother of us all."i The next point for consideration is, whether that generation only, which shall be living at the commencement of the Mil- lenriium, shall partake of it ; or whether the departed saints will equally share in it. The latter view I shall prove to be the correct one, by an argument which will equally disprove the notion of a Millennium separate from a resurrection. It is by a comparison of two passages (the one in Hebrews, the other in Thessalonians) which mutually reflect on each other. Let us suppose (as some do) that the Lord and his saints are now in the enjoyment of the kingdom promised, and that every believer enters into it at death : in this case it is plain, that the saints on earth are for the present excluded from it. But the Apostle, to prevent such an imagination, tells us, *' These all," (including Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, &c. who are instanced,) " having obtained a good report [or, ' rather, having borne witness"^] through faith, received not ' the promise ; God having provided some better thing for us, * that they ivithout us should not be made perfect. "k This proves, that, whether the enjoyment of the promise is to be on earth or in heaven, the whole Church will be glorified together ; the saints of one generation not receiving the promise without the saints of other generations. On the other hand, let us suppose that the generations * naprvprjOiVTSc, agreeing with vt(pog i^iap-vpojv, the " cloud of witnesses," in the first verse of the next chapter. g Gal. V. 6 ; VI. 15, 16. h Ephes. ii. 11—22. i Rora. iv. 16 and Gal. iv. 26. k Heb. xi. 39, 44. 61 alive at the commencement of the Millennium are to enjoy the promise of the kingdom : — that then only, and to them only, is to be fulfilled what is "UTitten, " that the kingdom * and dominion and the greatness of the kingdom under the ' whole heaven, shall be given to the saints of the Most *■ High/'l It is plain, that the departed saints, though most of them have lived in expectation of the promise, must be shut out from it. But this also the Apostle says to us " hy the ' word of the Lord. — that we which are alive and remain unto ' the coming of the Lord, shall not prevent them which are ' asleep. "21 Thus again both are to rejoice together; — and this at the coming of the Lord : for the Lord will descend and bring the Church above with him, w^hilst the Church below will undergo a change : even as it is written, " When Christ who is our life shall appear, then shall ye also appear v^ith him in glory. "^^ The opinion which limits the reigning in this kingdom to the mart}-rs only, is the last which I shall consider, and a brief notice of it will be sufficient. For it entirely rests upon Rev- elation XX, 4, which is supposed to confine the first resurrec- tion to those " beheaded for the witness of Jesus." But here are also included, when we come to examine the subject more accurately, those " which had not worshiped the beast, neither received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands. ""^ This may be clearly inferred from chap. xi. 18, which extends the reward then to be given to " all that fear the name of God, both great and small." II. Having shown that the saints in general are to partake of the kingdom, it will greatly confirm the view which I have taken of its being on earth, to glance at some of the promises which are made to the saints ; keeping in mind, that they belong to the whole of them. Isaiah says to the righteous, in one place, — " Thine eyes ' shall see the king in his beauty ; they shall behold the land * that is very far oiF:"o and in another, " that God should ' cause him to ride upon the high places of the earth, and feed ' him with the heritage of Jacoh his father.''^ David declares, 1 Daniel VII. 27. ^ 1 Thess. iv. 15. " Col. iii. 4. « Isa. xxxiii. 17. P Isa. Lviii. 14. * See Whitby in loco ; who, though a decided anli-miUennarian, makes here two distinct classes ; — viz. the souls of those beheaded, and the souls of those who had not worshiped the beast. 62 ' that " the righteous shall be exalted and inherit the earth for ever;"q and says of himself, " that he had fainted, unless * he had believed to see the goodness of the Lord in the land * of the living."^ The Lord Jesus repeats the assurance under the Gospel, " that the meek shall inherit the earth."^ St. Paul, as we have seen, reminds children of the promise annexed to the fifth commandment, (viz. " that thy days may be long * in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee,") " that it ' may be well with thee (he adds) and that thou may est live * long on the earth. "t This latter testimony is the more satisfactor}'-, if we apply to it a rule of interpretation laid down by St. Paul in Hebrews. He contends, that because it is written in David — " If they shall enter into my rest," there must remain a rest for the people of God. For he ar- gues, that the Lord could not mean the Sabbath rest at crea- tion, neither the rest in the land given them under Joshua ; seeing that after these had taken place he still speaks of a rest to come ; saying, " If they shall enter into my rest."^ This is the Apostle's principle of interpreting prophecy ; and it would violate this principle not to conclude, that as he promises length of days in the land to Gentiles, at the time when the Jews were just about to be cast out of it, there must remain an inheriting of the land to the people of God. Those who presume these promises to be figurative thus explain how the meek shall inherit the earth : viz. that they are contented with their present lot ; and that, if they needed more, God would give it to them, even unto the possession of the whole world. But such an interpretation appears ob- jectionable on various grounds. First, it offends against the plain grammatical sense of the promise ; which is, that the meek shall inherit the earth : whereas, if they now possess it through contentment, it should rather be written, " Blessed are the meek for they do inherit the earth." The whole argu- ment indeed of St. Paul, just noticed, loses its cogency, if, when our Saviour, after so long a time, promises that the meek shall inherit the earth, we are to understand it of the past. " For (to paraphrase the reasoning of the Apostle,) if they had always thus inherited the earth, then would he not afterwards have spoken of a future inheriting : there remaineth, therefore, an inheritance of the earth to the meek." Secondly, q Psalm XXXVII. 9, 11, 29, 34. r pg. xxvii. 13. s Matt. v. 5. t Ephes. VI. 2, 3. ^ Heb, chap. iv. 63 it contradicts the whole scope of unfulfilled promise ; which, as I have demonstrated, regards a future kingdom to be mani- fested on earth. Thirdly, it lowers and degrades the promises of God ; as if we were afraid to trust him, when marvellous power must be exerted to fulfil the word ; and therefore placed a meaning upon it which is accomplished in the ordinary course and moral nature of things, without any promise at all. We shall next find the saints included in the promises under every particular, in which we have been led to consider them in regard to Christ. 1 . The Father has appointed unto him a kingdom ; and he tells his disciples, " I appoint unto you a kingdom, as the ' Father hath appointed unto me ; that ye may eat and drink * at my table in my kingdom and sit on thrones judging the * twelve tribes of Israel. "v He tells them also, " that when * the Son of Man shall come in his glory, the King shall say * to them on his right hand, Come ye blessed of my Father, ' inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of ' the world. "w And " then shall the righteous shine forth as * the sun in the kingdom of their Father. "x 2. Again, Christ is declared to be a king : so in Psalm xlv. 16, the promise to the Church is, " Instead of thy fathers * shall be thy children, whom thou mayest make princes in all * the earth." Agreeing with which is that passage in Reve- lation, (put into the mouths of the departed saints) "' Thou * hast made us unto our God kings and priests, and we shall * reign on the earth."Y 3. Once more, a throne is prepared for the Lord, which I will call a throne of glory ; because it is said, that when he shall come with his angels, then shall he sit on the throne of his glory. Now Hannah is made to prophesy, that the Lord ** raiseth up the poor out of the dust and lifteth up the beggar ' from the dunghill, to set them among princes, and to make * them inherit the throne of glory :"z which agrees with that in Revelation; — " To him that overcometh will I grant to sit * with me in my throne ; even as I also overcame and am set * down with my Father in his throne. "a And if any inquire. How so many can sit on the throne of Jesus, I answer with Jeremiah : " At that time they shall call Jerusalem the throne * of the Lord ;"t> «' for there also (saith David) are set thrones * of judgement. "e Abdiel. V Luke XXII. 29,30. ^^Matt. xxv. 34. ^Ib. xiii.43. Y Rev. v. 10. « 1 Sam. 11. 8. a Rev, m. 21. b Jer. in. 17. c Pg. cxxii. 5. 64 Essay VI. THE FIRST RESURRECTIOX. Having shewn, that all who are " called to be saints" are to participate in the millennial kingdom and glory, the ques- tion will immediately arise in the minds of some, — How is this to be accomphshed in regard to those who are asleep in Jesus ? A satisfactory answer may be dra^ii from 1 Cor. xv. St. Paul there argues that our faith is altogether vain, unless there be a Resurrection ; and having largely treated on this subject he concludes by assuring them, " that therefore their labor is 7iot in vain in the Lord." I reply, therefore, that the departed saints are to be brought into the enjoyment of this blessed and glorious state by means of a resurrection, prior in order of time to the resurrection of the vricked, and distin- guished in Scripture as the first resurrection ; — not first (as some would imagine) by a priority of a few hours only, but by a period of at least a thousand years. The former circum- stance would in itself confer but little pre-eminence ; since it would not matter, whether the saints were raised a few hours before, or even after, the wicked, provided they did but rise to the enjoyment of glory, honor, and immortality. Nor in- deed would a precedence, which merely regarded the order of time, even to the extent of a thousand years, avail much : it is the circumstance, that all the promises of God for good (so far as they are at present revealed) are connected with this period, that gives to it such peculiar importance. To be pri- vileged to enjoy this Millennium declares us to be " blessed and holy ;"^ whUst to be excluded from it, will mark us " as unjust and filthy still." ^ Within this period is concentrated that special glory which results to Christ as man-mediator : and he, therefore, who is not included in that heavenly com- pany which shall descend at the archangel's shout, w^ill not " be with him, where he is, to behold that glory which God has given him."^ It is true, that there are one or two passages in Scripture which might lead us to suppose, that the resurrection of the righteous and mcked take place together. I refer to that description in Matt. xxv. of the Son of Man on a Rev. XX, 6. b Rev. xxii. 11. ''- John xvii. 24. 65 the throne of his glory, and all the nations gathered before him, which he separates into two classes ; one of which goes away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal. And secondly, to a passage in John v : " The hour ' is coming in the which all that are in the graves shall hear ' his voice, and shall come forth ; they that have done good * unto the resurrection of life, and they that have done evil ' unto the resurrection of damnation." These are the only places I deem it needful to dwell upon : for though the notions of some are so unaccountably mystified on this subject, that I have met with many who interpret Christ's coming to judge the " quick and the dead," as if quick and dead meant right- eous and li'icked ; yet it is so evident to all who only reflect for a moment, that it means those living when our Lord shall come, and those who have died in the mean while, that I need not consume time in refuting the mistake. I mean not now to enter into a particular exposition of the above two passages : I shall content myself with examining the principal point connected with the difficulty ; viz. the apparent fixing of the two events, or the two act- ings connected with one great event, to the same point of time. In order to this I must bring before the notice of the Reader a principle of interpretation, which we may gather from Heb, II. and 1 Cor. xv. In Heb. ii. St. Paul quotes Psalm viii. applying it to the reign of Christ ; ('* Thou hast put all things in subjection imder his feet;") and he then argues ; " For in that he put ' all in subjection under him, he left nothing that is not put * under him." This appears very absolute ; as if all, not even excepting God himself, were to be put under his authority. But in 1 Cor. xv. 27, where the same Psalm is applied, we have this qualification ; "When he saith «// things are put ' under him, it is manifest that HE is excepted v/hich did put ' all things under him." From the Scriptures therefore we infer, that if at any time we meet with a text, which seems to contradict some other plainly revealed fact, " it is manifest" that we must qualify that text, according to the nature and necessity of the case ; taking care that w^e reconcile one Scrip- ture wdth another, and do not destroy one by another. To illustrate this I must draw your attention to some i3ro- phecies of Scripture, about which there is little or no dispute, and which seem to refer to one event only, or to two events 66 taking place at one period of time ; but which we are com- pelled to admit, from other passages and from facts, refer to tivo distinct events, betw^een which a considerable interval of time must necessarily elapse. I will begin with the captivities of the Jews, which some- times are so blended, that careless readers of God's word often suppose the prophecies which speak of them to refer only to the Babj'lonish captivity ; and need to have pointed out to them those circumstances w^hich prove, that the pre- sent dispersion of the Jews must be included or primarily intended. The same may be said of the restoration from Babylon, ■when their city and temple were rebuilt under Zerubbabel ; and of their final glory, when Jerusalem shall put on her beautiful garments ; — distinct events, which are nevertheless so blended together, that it requires careful observation in order to point out the distinguishing marks. Next I may instance the Advent of our Lord Jesus. Many texts might be brought forward, which seem to include his first and second coming as one event ; and we know that the Jews, because they did not distinguish these, were led into error, and rejected our Lord when he came to suffer. I will instance one passage, (Job, xix. 25,) connected with the re- surrection; in which Job says — "I know that my Redeemer liv- * eth and he shall stand in the latter day upon the earth ; and * though after my skin worms shall destroy my body, yet in my ' flesh shall I see God, — whom I shall see for myself and mine * eyes shall behold and not another." Many might suppose from this text, that thepoint of time when the Redeemer should stand on the earth — ' the latter day — was the period of the general resurrection, in which Job should have his lot : and it is only from other texts, and from the fact, we find, that two comings were to take place, with a long interval between, reconcileable with the phrase latter day. Were not indeed the principle for which I am contending to be received, a Jew might deny from this text the reality of any standing of the Redeemer upon earth prior to the time, when Job should be raised to behold him in the flesh. The next important event which I shall notice is that pro- phecy of Joel, quoted by Peter on the day of Pentecost, and beginning — " It shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, * I will pour out my Spirit upon all flesh." Let any man. 67 unacquainted with the history of the apostohc times, look at this prophecy, and hit the joint if he can, which shall sepa- rate between the first and second outpouring of the Spirit : though we all seem to expect a further fulfilment of it, and allow that an interval must be interposed. I shall only instance further the prophecies concerning An- tichrist. The second advent of Jesus was thought by the Thessalonians, from Paul's occasional language, to be imme- diately at hand. And no wonder : for he speaks of himself and them, as if they were to survive till that event should happen — " w^e which are alive and remain." But he reminds them in another Epistle, that he had taught them, how that event should not take place, except there should come a falling away first, and the man of sin should be revealed : so that the time for Antichrist to grow up, seize the dominion, and reign, must of necessity come in before the glorious appearing of the Lord : which the Thessalonians certainly might have inferred, had they carefully considered other Scriptures, or re- membered all that the Apostle had taught them. Now I claim for the general doctrine of the Resurrection the exercise of this same principle of interpretation ; and if I can show, that in many places the doctrine of a resurrec- tion of the saints is revealed, altogether distinct from that of the wicked, w^e are bound to receive that doctrine in such manner as shall fall in with the general scope of Scripture.* 1, I begin with 1 Cor. xv. 22 — 26, which explicitly gives the order in which all shall rise. " For as in Adam all die, so in ' Christ shall all be made alive ; but every man in his oivn ' order : Christ the first fruits ; — afterwards, they that are ' Christ's, at his coming ; — then cometh the end, when he ' shall have delivered up the kingdom, &c. and shall finally ' destroy the last enemy, death." Here are three degrees in * It is worthy of remark, that most of those expositors, who, from the two places of Scripture now under consideration, insist on the re- surrection of the righteous and the wicked as one in point of time, do nevertheless, in their interpretation of our Lord's prophecy in Matthew XXIV, generally contend for two judgements j (the one on Jerusalem, the other at the second advent ;) though they confess them to be so in- volved the one in the other, that it is difficult to distinguish them. I differ entirely from such an interpretation of that chapter, as makes it an involved prophecy ; but I mention it now merely to show the incon- sistency of their objection, when urged against the millennarian doctrine of the Resurrection. 68 the order of the resurrection. (1) First we have " Christ the first-fruits." St. Paul tells Festus and Agrippa, that Moses and the Prophets had testified, " that Christ should suffer, ' and that he should be the Jirst that should rise from the ' dead :"e which was typified by the offering of the first-fruits of the harvest. And in tliis first-fruits may perhaps be in- cluded those saints, who came out of their graves after the re- surrection of Christ, and went into the holi/ city, and appear- ed unto many,* — a blessed earnest of their own future mani- festation in the same place. (2) Secondly we have it — " afterwards they that are Christ's, at his coming :" or as I would paraphrase it, — " Afterwards, at the coming of Christ, those that belong to him." For some read this (or at least so interpret it) as if it were — " Afterwards those who, at the coming of Christ, shall be his ; as if those only are intended, who shall at that time be walking in the faith of Christ. But forasmuch as these will be then already living in the flesh, the promise of a resurrection cannot have reference to them. They will undergo a change ; and they will be privileged, like Enoch and Elijah, never to see death. All those must there- fore be intended, who shall be asleep in Jesus, and whom, at his coming he will raise and bring with him. Let it be ob- served however, that there is no mention of the ivicked dead ; — " those that are Christ's" (3) Next it follows, — " Then (after that) cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the kingdom ;" — a plain proof that the kingdom is to be be- tween his coming and this end. 2. I shall take a second testimony from 1 Thessalonians iv. 13 — 18; because there can be no doubt that this passage, like the former, is to be understood in a plain and literal sense. For as in the former instance, the Apostle expressly instructs them in the nature of the resurrection, to guard them against the error of those who denied it ; so here he teaches them plainly concerning those who sleep in Jesus, that they may * Another instance of negligent exposition, which I have more than once heard from the pulpit, is the making these saints come out of their graves at the crucifijcion of our Lord : in which case Jesus would not be the first that rose from the dead to die no more. The Evan- gelist, though he mentions it in connexion with his narrative of the cru- cifixion, does nevertheless distinctly state, that they came out of their graves after his resurrection. Matt, xxvii. 52, 53. <" Acts XXVI. 23. 69 not sorrow as men without hope of seeing them again. To suppose that in either instance the language is symbolical, allegorical, or figurative, beyond what belongs to our ordinary use of figure, is to offend against the context and common sense of these passages. The Apostle, then, assures those, who were disposed to sorrow without hope of seeing their believing friends again, that " the Lord Jesus will bring them with him when he comes ; ' — For that the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with ' a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the ti-ump ' of God ; and the dead in Christ shall rise first. Then we, * which are alive and remain, shall be caught up together with ' them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air ; and so ' shall Ave ever be with the Lord," Note how exactly this agrees with the former testimony in Corinthians : — the dead in Christ onli/ are raised — those living in Christ are changed — and at the last trump, announcing the coming of the Lord."^ (See 1 Cor. xv. 22.) * As the learned Dr. Wardlaw, in his recently published volume of sermons, attacks the mLUennarian dew of this text, a few observations on his argument may not be unacceptable. I will first give his exposi- tion verbatim. " The following expression, in 1 Thess. iv. 16, has been sometimes adduced in evidence of the resurrection of the righteous pre- ceding that of the wicked : — and by many, indeed, who do not hold the tenets of millennarianism, it is often inconsiderately quoted as if it con- veyed this meaning : — ' For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and the trump of God, and the DEAD IX Christ shall rise first.' — But it requires only the reading of the passage to satisfy any candid mind, that there is in it no reference to the resurrection of the wicked at all. The preceding verse — the loth, stands thus : ' For this we say unto yon by the word of the * Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord, ' shall not prevent them which are asleep.' — In this verse, the word * prevent^ means to anticipate, to get the start, or taJce the precedence, of another. Of the statement thus given, the 16th and 17th verses are an explanatory amplification. * We who are alive and remain,' says the Apostle, * shall not prevent,' that is, shall not anticipate, or take pre- cedence, or get the start of ' them that are asleep : for the Lord himself * shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel ' and the trump of God, and the dead in Christ shall first rise ; then' — what ? a thousand years after the wicked shall rise ? Not at all : — ' then, * we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them,' (this is the explanation of their not preventing or anticipating them,) ' to ' meet the Lord in the air : — and so shall we ever be with the Lord.' — The living saints, at the Lord's coming, shall await the rising of those 70 3, The next circumstance I shall notice is, that the Scrip- tures particularize some one resurrection by certain phrases, added for the sake of eminence. For example : " the resur- rection of life "^ — " Tlie poor cannot recompense thee, but thou shalt be recompensed at the resurrection of the just /'S — f John V. 29. S Luke xiv. 14. that are dead, and all shall then ascend together. Such is the Apostle's own explanation of his own language." P. 513. The chief circumstance which I complain of in this exposition is, that Dr. Wardlaw, after stating " that it requires only the reading of the entire passage," &c, Ihnits the entire of the passage to the previous verse, instead of beginning at the 1.3th verse ; and thus he wrests the passage from its real context. The Apostle's object is evidently to pre- vent the Thessalonians from sorrowing for the dead, as though they had no hope of seeing them again : not, as the Doctor would have us infer, to correct erroneous notions of their getting the start or j^^^c^- deacy of the dead. (See a further exposition of this text at page 61 of my last Essay.) Secondly, I would ask, How it is consistent with show- ing, that there is to be no precedency in the resurrection, to expound this passage, as if, after all, the dead are to get the start of those remain- ing in the flesh ? Thirdly, if " the living saints, at the Lord's coming, * shall await the rising of those that are dead, and all shall then ascend ' together ;" how are we to understand the Apostle, when he says, " them * also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him ?" This is their de- scent, not their G*-cent. The same is expressed in Zechariah ; — " The * Lord my God shall come and all the saints ic it h thee :^' and also in Jude ; — " Behold the Lord cometh with myriads of his saints." Fourth- ly, I have an observation to make upon the words — " to meet the Lord * in the air." The word used in the original is a7ravT}](ng — not the verb, but a noun ; and literally is " caught up into the air to the meet- * ing of the Lord." The word aTrav-jjmc occurs in three other places in the New Testament, and invariably signifies a meeting for the purpose of receiving and welcoming the individual and to escort him back. Thus it is in Matthew xxv. where the ten virgins are first said to go forth and meet the bridegroom, {v. 1,) and then are surprised in their slumber by the cry, " Go ye out to meet him." (v. 6.) It occurs the third time in Acts XXVIII. 15 : — ** And from thence, when the brethren heard of * us, they came to meet us, {eig a-avTi^aii' vfni') as far as Appii Forum . ' and the three taverns : whom when Paul saw, he thanked God and took * courage. And when we came to Rome," &c. It is evident here, that they met Paul, not to stay with him at the three taverns, but to continue ■with him by going back with him. And the whole context in Thessa- lonians seems to require, that we explain it of the saints going out to welcome the Lord in the air : not to continue in the air with him ; but to accompany him on his visit here, and therefore to return with him. For unless the saints return with Christ, the wicked must also be caught up for fhdX judgement, which the anti-miUennarians always suppose hap- pens at the same time with this event. I may add here, in defence of 71 ^' They accepted not deliverance that they might obtain a bet- ter resurrection."^ Now what can this better resurrection, this resurrection of life, this resurrection of the just mean, but something eminently distinguished from the resurrection of the wicked ? Yea, such an emphasis is generally laid upon this one, that we might with more reason conclude against any resurrection of the wicked at all, than against a resurrec- tion of believers separate and distinct from it. Thus our Lord says of the risen saints, " that they are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection." i In John's Gospel he three times declares it to be the special privilege of a be- liever, " that he will raise him up at the last day .-"J but the single circumstance, that he should be raised at the last day, would cease to be a distinction, were the wicked to be raised at the same time. A similar argument may be raised on a passage in St. Paul's Epistle to the Philippians,^ where he says, that he sought to know the fellowship of Christ's suffer- ings, &c. " if by any means he might attain unto the resur- rection of the dead -.""^ for St. Paul knew well, and had de- clared, that there should be a resurrection both of the just and this view of a7ravr7](ng, that, on referring to Schleusner, I find he in- terprets it — '' cum quis alteri obviam procedit (vel rapitur) ad eum ex- ■cipiendum.^^ * Phil. III. 11. It is not unimportant to notice, that the Greek word used in this instance by St. Paul, for the resurrection unto which he was so desirous to attain, is not ava-aaic, the usual phrase employed ; but e^ava^aaig — ttjv tiava^aaiv rojv vsKpiov — implying, as some ar- gue, the resurrection of a part out of many dead ones. So far as em- phasis is laid upon the peculiar use of the word in this one place, I must confess I attach no peculiar importance to it ; not seeing why the pre- position f/c should imply a partial resurrection when attached to ava- -^aaig, more than when used separately. We meet with it in connexion with the resurrection in every possible position, that is consistent with grammar : e. g. in composition, sEava^aaic, as in the text ; — detached from avaracrig yet before and governing it, as in Acts xxvi. 23, where it is spoken of Christ, who was rrporog s^ avw^acrtojg vsKpuv ; and in Luke XX. 25, and in other places, t) ava^aaig r) eK vzKpojv. In all which places there does appear to me a special signification intended ; viz. that in them mention is made, not of the abstract doctrine of a resurrection of dead ones, {ava^aaig vsKpcov,) nor merely of a resurrection from death; but ek vsicp 2 Cor. VI. 2. ^ Rom, xiii. 12. 83 and time, the English reader is not aware of those numerous passages, in which it is placed for an independent period. I Inust therefore instance a few. It is translated season in the following passages ; John v. 35 ; 2 Cor. vii. 8 ; Philemon v, 15. In the first instance it signifies the whole period of John Baptist's ministry ; in the second, the time which elapsed be- tween the reception by the Corinthians of the two Epistles of St. Paul ^^Titten to them ; and in the third instance, the whole term of the desertion of Onesimus from his master Philemon. In John XVI. 2. and 25, 26 ; also 1 John ii. 18 ; it is trans- lated tinie. In the first instance it applies at the least to the whole period in which the Christians were persecuted by the Jews, who blindly thought they were doing God service. In the second instance it relates to the whole period (according to Beza's interpretation) from the ascension of Christ to the end of time ; in which the Lord teaches men by his Spirit, and they pray to the Father in his name.* And here it is to be remarked, that the phrase " the time (woa) cometh" in verse 25, is from the context exactly equivalent to the words " at that day" in verse 26, and applied to the very same period. The third instance, " Little children it is the last time," (ojpa) is interpreted by Scott and other commentators to signify " the last dispensation ,-" and therefore must be taken to extend through the whole space of years from the time of John to the second Advent of our Lord.f The conclusion therefore at which I arrive is this : that as the whole period of depression and vengeance on the Jews is the day of their visitation ; so the day of judgement is the pe- riod of their restoration and triumph. And again, that as the whole Church of Christ has been conflicting through a long night of trial in various ways : so, ' that great day is to con- * Beza on this place says " Spiritus sanctus ah ascensione Christi in Apostolos effusus, summa quseque mysteria et solutis nostrse arcana, turn ipsos, turn etiam Ecclesiam per ipsos, erudiit, et adfinem usque seculorum erudiet.^* •f" In further corroboration of this sense of the word ujpa I would observe, that the Seventy most commonly translate the Hebrew ny by it ; which is the more remarkable because Legh, in his Critica Sacra, says it answers to the Greek Kaipog. Parkhurst states concerning this same word riy " That it particularly denotes the time of vengeance or punishment." He instances Jer. xxvii. 7 ; Ezek. vii. 7, and xxx. 3 ; and directs us to compare Luke xxi. 24, which relates to the whole period of " the times of the Gentiles." 84 sist in bringing all her enemies under her feet ; — she shall be no more oppressed, but triumphant and glorious to the end. II. Having shewn that the Judgement of Christ will con- sist in the deliverance of his people, and in a rule or reign of righteousness, I have now to show that it is also a period of VENGEANCE on his cnemics. The passages are so numerous in the prophets, which speak of a time of signal wrath upon the ungodly, and of awful slaughter and bloodshed, that the most cursory reader must be acquainted with them. Aly present object therefore will be, not to bring before the Reader the mere fact of this period of tribulation ; but, in order that he may form some notion of the uniform testimony of the prophets to this event, to select a few of the more remarkable jDassages, which are linked and tied together, like the curtains in the tabernacle, by certain obvious and peculiar expressions. And I will further beg him to observe, that this vengeance or indignation is in many instances so connected with the period of the glory which the Church shall enjoy, as to justify me in saying, that it will im- mediately precede or usher in that dispensation. First we will take Isaiah xxiv, of which I shall give the principal features. It opens by solemnly inviting the attention of all flesh. " Come near, ye nations, to hear ; and hearken, * ye people ; — let the earth hear, and all that is therein; — the ' ivorld, and all things that come forth of it. For the indigna- ' lion of the Lord is upon all nations, and his fury upon all ' their armies : he hath utterly destroyed them : he hath de- ' livered tliem to tJie slaughter. Their slain also shall be cast * out, and their stink shall come up out of their carcases, and * the mountains shall be melted trith their blood." Then at verse 5 : " Behold it shall come down upon Idumea ; (i. e. ' Edam ;) and upon the people of mg curse, to juugemext." — " The sword of the Lord is filled with blood — for the Lord ' hath a great sacrifice in Bozrah, and a great slaughter in the ' land of Idumea — the land shall be soaked with blood, and * their dust made fat with fatness — for it is the day of the * Lord's vengeance, and the year of recompenses for the con- ' troversy of Zion." Then (after dwelling upon the manner in which the land shall be desolated) it bursts out, in the next chapter, with a rapturous description of the way in which the earth shall afterwards be renewed for the righteous. In tliis passage I will chiefly call attention to the circum- 85 stance, that the judgement therein spoken of falls on Idumea, (or Edom,'^) of which Bozrah was the cnpital. This will clearl}'' connect the prophecy with another in Isaiah lxiii. 1 — 5 ; which informs us also icho is to be the great actor in the tribulation. " Who is this that cometh from Edom, with dyed garments ' from Bozrah ? this that is glorious in his apparel, travelling * in the greatness of his strength?" Answei". — " I that speak in righteousness, mighty to save." — " Wherefore art thou red ' in thine apparel, and thy garments like him that treadeth the ' wine/at ?" Answer. — " I have trodden the v:inepress alone ; ' and of the people there was none with me. For I will tread * them in mine anger, and trample them in my fury ; and their ' blood shall be sprinkled vpon my garments, and I will stain all ' my raiment. For the day of vengeance is in mine heart, and * — the year of my redeemed is come." Here, in addition to Idumea and Bozrah, is introduced the treadiny of the vrine- press, and that evidently by Messiah, and the staining of his garments thereby with blood : now mark how this identities the words of Isaiah with those of St. John. In Rev. XIV. we have a description of ** the vine of the ' earth, which is cast into the great wine-press of the wrath of * God ; and the wine-press is trodden without the city, and * blood comes out of the wine-press even unto the horse bridles, ' by the space of a thousand and six hundred furlongs :" — a symbolical and figurative description ; but calculated to afford us a most awful notion of the great slaughter and destruction alluded to ! In Rev. xix. we may recognise further circum- stances : Messiah is introduced ** clothed with a vesture dip- ' ped in blood, and his name is called The Word of God, &c. ' and he treadeth the wine-press of the fierceness of the wrath ' of Almighty God. And he hath on his vesture and on his ' thigh a name written, KING of kings and LORD of lords. * And I saw an angel standing in the sun ; and he cried with ' a loud voice, saying to all the fowls that fly in the midst cf ' heaven, Come and gather yourselves together unto the svpper ' of the great God ; that ye may eat the flesh of kings, cap- ' tains, mighty men, horses, &c." * The ancient, as also the modern, Jews, and after them various ex- positors, interpret Edom to be Rome ; but as my object is not now so much to apply the prophecy, as to mark its character, I enter not into this question. 86 I add the latter part of the above passage, in which the fowls of heaven are called to a great supper, for the purpose of shewins:, that this a2:ain connects St. John with a well known prophecy in Ezek. xxxix. concerning the destruction of Gog and Magog, the slaughter of whose armies will be so great as to require seven months to bury the dead. At verse 17 are these words : " And thou son of man, thus saith the ' Lord God ; speak unto every feathered fowl, and to every ' beast of the field, Assemble yourselves and come-, gather your- ' selves on every side to my sacrifice that I do sacrifice for you, ' even a great sacrifice upon the mountains of Israel, that ye * may eat flesh, and drink blood. Ye shall eat the fiesh of the ' mighty, and drink the blood of princes of the earth — ye shall ' be filled at my table with horses and chariots, with mighty ' men, and with all men of war saith the Lord God. And — I ' will set my glory among the heathen, and all the heathen ' shall see my judgemeiit that I have executed, and my hand * that I have laid upon them." In this manner we might glance at many other prophecies, and shew their evident relation to the same period of destruc- tion, by similar internal and conspicuous marks : particularly a variety of passages, which shew the destruction to be sudden as well as extensive, coming upon the nations with the fierce- ness and rapidity of ^ichirlwind ; which is the figure frequently used to describe it. " He shall take them away as with a ' ichirhvind, both living, and in his wrath. — The righteous ' shall rejoice when he seetli the vengeance : he shall icash his 'feet in the blood of the wicked: so that a man shall sa)'-, verily ' there is a reward for the righteous ; verily he is a God that ' judgeth in the earth."* III. There is another important feature connected with the judgement, which must also be noticed ; viz, the eflfect to be produced by the supposed agency of fire at this period. Most christians admit, that there is to be a conflagration of of the world ; and it was the opinion of the early Millennarian Fathers, as also of many of the Reformers, that it would be the great agent employed to regenerate the material globe, to purify and restore it to its pristine state (yea more than its * Psalm Lxvm. 9— U. See also Prov. i. 23—33 ; Isa. xvii. 12—14 ; XL. 18—24 ; xn. 14—16 ; lxvi. 15, 16; Jer. xxv. 15—38, but es- pecially verses 31 — 33. Compare also Jer. xxm, 19, 20, with xxx. 23, 24 ; Hab. in, throughout, but especially verses 12 — 15. 87 pristine state) of beauty and salubriousness, and thus to fit it for the abode of the righteous. But it has been and is dis- puted, whether this conflagration is to take place before or af- ter the Millennium ; and secondly, among those who believe it to be /)re-millennial, it is further disputed, whether it is to burn up the wJiole luorld, or only the jjrophetical earth, or only the region of Palestine in its utmost limits. As to the extent of the conflagration, I have no clear light vouchsafed to me. And though I incline from various consi- derations to conclude, that there will be a judgement by fire before the Millennium ; (whatever may take place after it ;) yet I confess, that great difficulties present themselves, and much may be said on the other side of the question. So that on this point I submit certain particulars more in the way of inquiry, and of communicating what may be gleaned from Scripture, than as a demonstration of the truth. First then let me observe, that a judgement hj fire is not always in the Scriptures to be understood literally ■ but it is a figure used by the prophets to denote tribulation and wrath. Thus Isaiah says, " The Lord shall purge the blood of Jeru- ' salem from the midst thereof, by the Spirit of judgement, • and by the spirit of hurning .-"1 upon which bishop Lowth ob- serves, that these are bold figures to set forth the Lord's wrath. Of this we have a convincing proof in the promise which Moses makes to the children of Israel, just previous to their taking possession of the land under Joshua. " Understand therefore • (he says) this day, that the Lord thy God is he which goeth ' over before thee : as a consuming fire he shall destroy them, • (thine enemies,) and he shall bring them down before thy ' face."i^ It is not unlikely therefore, that some places, which speak of fire, only respect that time of bloodshed and trouble we have considered : as where it is said in Zephainah, " All the earth shall be devoured with the fire of my jealousy. "ii It is also worthy of remark, as proving fire to be frequently a symbol, that whereas in St. Luke's Gospel Jesus says, " I am come to send^?T on the earth ;"o the parallel place in St. Matthew is — " I came not to send peace, but a sword. "v And indeed Luke himself aftei-wards explains it of the divisions and persecutions which would accompany the Gospel. I cannot however understand St. Paul as speaking otherwise than liter- 1 Isa. IV. 4. m Deut. ix, 3. « Zepli. in. 8. » Chap. xii. 49. P Chap. X. 34. 88 ally, when he says, " that the Lord Jesus shall be revealed 'from heaven, with his mighty angels, m fiaminy fire taking ' vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the ' Gos])el of our Lord Jesus Christ/'q Nor can it be figure when St. Peter says," that the heavens and the earth, which 'are now, are reserved unto /re against the dayofjudge- ' ment and perdition of ungodly men."'^ And Isaiah appears plainly to distinguish between the judgements of fire and the sword when he says, that " the Lord will come with fire, and ' with his chariots like a whirlwind, — to render his anger with 'fury and his rebuke with fiames of fire: for by fire and by ' his sicord v;ill the Lord plead with all flesh. "s IV. Another point remains for inquiry which is of intense interest to the Church of Christ ; viz. What becomes of the Lord's people during this time of tribulation } 1. Previous to shewing their safety, it may be well to notice of the nations generally, that, however some Scriptures may apparently speak of their absolute and entire destruction, liv- ing creatures will nevertheless be left, both men and animals, from out of that dreadful time of desolation. This is indeed for the most part to be proved rather in the way of inference, from certain expressions in those passages themselves, which, in their first aspect, would lend us to conclude the contrary : for I a])prehend, that the Spirit would have men's minds to no- tice chiefly the tribulation which is coming, that they may stand in awe and sin not. First, let us take the prophet Isaiah. In chapter xxiv. 5, 6, we read : " The earth also is defiled under the inhabitants ' thereof; because they have transgressed the laws, changed ' the ordinance, broken the everlasting covenant. Therefore * \y:.\\\ the curse devoured the eartli, and they that dwell there- * in are de:-:olate : therefore the inhabitants of the earth are * burned, and — few men left." This at first view speaks as if all were burned ; but afterwards it lets fall an intimation, that ?ifeiu will be left. In chap. Lxvi. 16, when the same Prophet says; " By fire and by his sword the Lord will plead with all flesh," he adds — " and the slain of the Lord shall be many .•" but that this does not mean all, though the prophecy relates to the great catastrophe under consideration, is evident from verse 19 — " And I will send those that escape of them unto the nations, q 2 Thess. I. 7, 8. r 2 Pet. iii. 7. » Isa, lxvi. 15, 16. 89 * to Tarshish, Pul, Lud, Tubal, Javan ; &c." which is iraport- ant as giving color to the opinion, that the nations on "whom the desolation falls are those of Christendom, or of the pro- phetic earth, and does not include the tribes and families of the earth still called heathen, as Tarshish, Pul, &c, Jeremiah xliv. is worthy also of notice ; not as containing matter immediately bearing upon the Judgement, but as evinc- ing how expressions must be qualitied and determined by the general context. In verse 14 we are told, " that none of the remnant of Judah, which are gone into the land of Egypt to sojourn there, shall escape or remain, &c. :" yet at the end of the verse is added " none shall return but such as shall escape," Verse 27 is still more sweeping in its sentence of destruction ; *' Behold I will watch over them for evil, and not for good : ' and ALL the men of Judah that are in the land of Egypt shall ' be consumed by the sword and by the famine until there be * an end of them." But in the next verse it is added, " Yet a small number that escape the sword shall return, &c." A similar instance occurs in Zechariah, chap. xiv. in which all nations are first descrihed as gathered against Jerusalem to battle, [v. 2) then as smitten with a plague which consumes them ; {vv. 12 — 15) but afterwards there is mention of " every ' one that is left of all the nations that came against Jeru- ' salem." Our Lord's intimation likewise concerning the tribulation, is to the point in hand ; " that exce])t those days should be ' shortened there should no flesh be saved :" for they clearly intimate that some in the flesh will be saved. I apprehend that what is spoken of Gog and I^Iagog in Ezekiel xxxix. 2, before the whole prophecy concerning this war is set out, is the real key to this difliculty : " I will leave but the sixth part of thee :" and that the numerous passages which speak of " them that escape of the nations," " the na- tions of them that are saved," " the remnant of them," " all that are left," must be considered as referring to this circum- stance. Further, in regard to brute animals, the promise to Noah appears to justify the conclusion, that there will not be an utter destruction, any more than when the earth was destroyed by water: " neither will I again smite any more every thing liv- ing, as I have done." — Which is another instance also, that the words " every thing living" must be qualified, and the con- tents of the ark deducted. 90 Psalm VIII. is likewise applied to the reign of Christ, both in Corinthians and Hebrews ; and this states, — " Thou hast put ' all things under his feet, all sheep and oxen, yea and the beasts ' of the field, the foicl of the air, and the fish of the sea :" so that if the conflagration be pre-millennial, there are animals preserved from it. By what means I presume not to state. Until God by his special power brought them to Noah into the ark, no man could have conceived how they should have been saved from the waters of a flood ; neither have I a satisfac- tory perception of the mode in which all these things will be so brought to pass as to harmonize with the entire Scrip- tures. 2. But of the safety of God! s people at this period of judge- ment, we have abundant and clear testimony. The world and the merely ;j?'o/e55m(/ Church, will, alas ! be taken by surprise. In the first instance all will appear going on as usual, in peace and security. As when the flood came in the days of Noah, and the burning in the time of Lot, they ^\ill be giving their chief concern to buying and selling, building and planting, marrying and giving in marriage. t The three angels, in the vision to Zechariah, report of a period ajDparently preceding this time : " We have walked to and fro through the earth, and behold — all the earth sitteth still and is at rest."^ " But * when they shall say. Peace and safety, then sudden destruc- • tion Cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child ; ' and they shall not escape. "^ The most striking figures are made use of to show, how sudden and unexpected the Advent and Judgement will be to such : e. g. " the pangs of labor" — " as the lightning cometh out of the east and shineth unto the west" — " as a snare or trap upon the nations ;" — and " as a thief in the night .-" just as in Pharaoh's time, the destroying angel went out at midnight, and a cry of distress was heard from the king on the throne to the captive in the dungeon.^ Up to the moment of his coming, men will be refusing to look at prophecy, and saying, " Where is the promise of his coming ?"x Of the righteous, however, we are expressly told, that the day of the Lord shall not overtake them as a thief in the night :y they will be looking out for the Saviour's approach, satisfied, from the signs of the times, that their redemption draweth nigh.z t Matt. XXIV. 38. " Zech. i. Compare v. 11 and vv. 18 — 21. V 1 Thess. V. 3. ^ Ex. xii. 29. ^ 2 Pet. in. 4. y 1 Thess. v. 4. » Luke XXI. 28. 91 They will apparently witness the tribulation, and it will be cut short for their sakes ; but they will be spared in it. Consider first what David says of the righteous — " that in the floods of great waters they shall not come nigh unto him."^ So in another place — " In the time of trouble he shall hide me * in his pavilion — in the secret of liis tabernacle shall he hide ' me — he shall set me upon a rock."b Psalm xxxvii. is throughout to this point, but especially verses 34, 38 — 40 : '• Wait on the Lord, and he shall exalt thee to inlierit the ' land : when the wicked are cut off thou shalt see it — The ' transgressors shall be destroyed together : the end of the * wicked shall be cut off: but the salvation of the righteous * is of the Lord, he is their strength in the time of trouble; ' and the Lord shall help them and deliver them ; he shall de- ' liver them from the wicked and save them, because they * trust in him." Again in Psalm xlv. " God is our refuge * and strength ; a very present help in trouble : therefore will ' we not fear, though the earth be removed, and though the ' mountains be carried into the midst of the sea ; though the * waters thereof roar and be troubled ; though the mountains ' shake with the swelling thereof." Isaiah says of the Lord's people — " They shall dwell in a peaceable habitation, and in ' sure dwellings, and in quiet resting places ; when it shall ' hail, coming down on the forest, and the city shall be low * in a low place. "^ And again, " Come, my people, enter * thou into thy chambers, and shut thy doors about thee," (an exhortation to prayer, Matt, vi.) " hide thyself as it were for ' a little moment, until the indignation be overpast. For be- ' hold the Lord cometh out of his place to punish the inhabit- * ants of the earth for their iniquity — the earth also shall ' disclose her blood, and shall no more cover her slain. "d There is also a remarkable prophecy in Jeremiah xxx. 4 — 9, concerning Israel and Judah at this time. " These (he says) ' are the words that the Lord spake concerning Israel and ' concerning Judah. For thus saith the Lord : we have heard ' a voice of trembling, of fear, and not of peace. Ask ye now ' and see, whether a man doth travail v/ith child } Wherefore ' do I see every man with his hands on his loins, as a woman ' in travail, and all faces are turned into paleness ? Alas ! for ' that day is great, so that none is like it. It is even the * Ps. XXXII. 6. b Ps. XXVII. 5. c isa. xxxii. 18, 19. disa. XXVI. 20, 21. 92 ' time of Jacob's trouble ; but — he shall he saved out of it. ' For it shall come to pass in that day, saith the Lord of hosts, * that I will break his j^oke from off thy neck, and will burst ' thy bonds, and strangers shall no more serve themselves of * him : but they shall serve the Lord their God and David ' their King-, Avhom I will raise up unto them." The next promise I shall notice is Joel in. 16. After de- scribing the time of trouble, he adds : "The Lord shall roar ' out of Zion, and utter his voice from Jerusalem, and the earth * shall shake : but the Lord will be the hope of His people and ' the strength of the children of Israel." I shall only quote one more from Zephaniah, because it shows again the suit- ableness of prayer at this time : " Seek ye the Lord, all ye * mec-k of the earth, which have wrought his judgement : seek ' righteousness, seek meekness : — it may be ye shall be hid ' in the day of the Lord's anger." I do not consider arguments derived from tyj:es as suited to lay at the foundation of a doctrine : but when we have direct testimony, similar to that which I have brought forward, they are very important collateral evidence. The analogy then of the types clearly confirms the testimoTiy adduced. The de- liverance, for example of Noah at the flood ; from which some argue, that (as the ark rose above the waters of the deluge, so in the fiery deluge,) the Church will rise to meet the Lord in the air, whilst the conflagration is going on below. The deli- verance also of Lot at the destruction of the cities of the plain, set fo!th as a special example of the vengeance of eternal fire.e The Exodus from Egypt again typifies a way of salvation for the people, at the very time when their enemies shall be over- thrown. The proceeding of Jehu,^ in the destruction of the whole of the worshipers of Baal, just at the moment when they thought their cause was most prosperous ; and the pre- vious careful exclusion from among them of the worshipers of Jehovah, I take to be another type. The well known escape of the christians to Pella at the destruction of Jerusalem may also be instanced ; and may other events. To believers therefore I w^ould say — yet, not I, but the Lord — " Watch ye, therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of Man." Luke xxi. 36. e Jude V. 7. f 2 Kings x. 18—25. 93 Essay VIII THE STATE OF SEPARATE SPIRITS. No circumstance connected with modem theology has more affected me with surprise, than the vague and unsatisfactory notions entertained by most respecting the present and future conditions of the dead. In its first aspect, so far as our own individual happiness is concerned, it appears to be the object of all others in di\dne revelation of most intense interest, and most calculated to engage the inquiry of intelligent mortals : and indeed there are few persons that are not led by the ordi- nary afflictions or sympathies of life to entertain the subject at some period of their existence, however transiently ; and there are few ministers, in the habit of encouraging religious conversation, who are not repeatedly assailed by inquiries on this head. Yet how many preachers and -svriters treat the topic with hesitation, or mere conjecture ; not seeming to have any decided scripture testimony on which to base their hopes ; as if they rather wished their sentiments to be true, than that they have a decided assurance that they are so. The conclusion to which this has led me is, that Christians in gen- eral, owing to erroneous views concerning the resurrection state and the kingdom of glory, have likewise fallen into error in regard to some important circumstances respecting the pre- sent and future conditions of the dead. And it is remarkable, that they commonly speak with the greater degree of confi- dence concerning the state of separate spirits, which is really an obscure point, and respecting which but little is revealed ; whilst in regard to that other state, which is declared to be *' life and immortality brought to light," and concerning which we have abundant revelation, they are inclined to discourage inquiry, as though it were altogether hopeless. I trust I write not these things in a spirit of arrogancy ; for I am deeply sensible that I have myself been precisely in this state, at a time when I was nevertheless desirous to as- certain and to communicate the truth : but I think it due to those holy doctrines which I advocate to avow, that it was only in proportion as their glorious light broke in upon my understanding that I was enabled to apprehend these other truths with any clearness. 94 As these Essays are chiefly intended to set forth the future condition of believers, I might have been justified in passing over the mention of the intermediate state : but as I consider it important, when advancing opinions opposed to the notions of many pious christians, not to let it be supposed that I en- tertain sentiments which I entirely reject ; I shall preface my inquiry into the resurrection state, by a notice of the state of separate spirits — i.e. of the state of souls after death. Some students of prophecy, dazzled perhaps by the first reception of light, were induced, when they embraced millen- narian views, to consider the state of the disembodied spirit as one of unconscious sleep ; and though most of them have now retracted this opinion, yet some hold it ; whilst many have only modified it, and, as it appears to me, do still degrade the separate state below what the Scriptures have revealed concerning it. I shall therefore endeavour to prove, 1st, that the dead in Christ are in a state of consciousness, in the fullest sense of the term ; and 2dly, that they are in a state of holy enjoyment, superior to any experienced upon earth.* I. That the spirit is in a state of unconsciousness is argued from the circumstance, that death is described in Scripture as a sleep, and that the dead are said to awake and arise from it. I doubt whether more be meant by such expressions than a figure, seeing that the very same phrases are applied by the Psalmist to God : — " Awake, why sleepest thou, O Lord } arise ; &c."a The same writers scout, as " idle," the notion of such Scriptures having respect only to the body :^ never- theless all these Scriptures are ambiguous in regard to their applicability to the spirit; whilst Psalm xvi. 9 (" My flesh shall rest in hope,") appears quite unequivocal as respects the body : and therefore I feel justified, when the context does * I do not think it needful to dwell formally upon another opinion, held by Socinians, that at death the soul is annihilated. We may refute them with this text (if they will receive it) — " Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul : but rather fear Him, which is able to destroy both body and soul in hell." For were the soul anni- hilated at death, its destruction would be placed within the power of man ; so that he who killed the body would as certainly annihilate the soul : when therefore it is stated, that men are not able to kill the soul, even though they kill the body, it is clear that bodily death does not annihilate the soul. * Ps. XLiv. 23 ; and see also lxxiii. 20 ; lxxviii. 65. b See Morning Watch, Vol. II. p. 382. 95 not determine the point, in limiting all doubtful instances to the body likewise. I apprehend Romans viii. 10, 11 to be referable to this subject : " And if Christ be in j^ou, the body is dead because ' of sin, but the spirit is life because of righteousness ; but if ' the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell ' in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also ' quicken your mortal body by his Spirit that dwelleth in you." Here observe that the body is condemned to death, whilst the spirit is redeemed from it ; and yet it is said, that the body shall hereafter be likewise quickened ; but where in the mean- while is the eminent distinction between the body being dead and the spirit life, unless it be that in the intermediate state the body sleeps, whilst the spirit enjoys a living conscious- ness } * * The Writers of the Morning Watch just referred to, when discussing the locality of Hades and Paradise, contend from Matt. xii. 38, and Rom. X. 7, that they are in the heart of the earth : nor am I disposed to question this part of the statement, which is generally supported by Scripture. But the application of the term steep to the bodi/ appears to them idle on this very account ; because the body soon becomes dissi- pated into dust and cannot therefore have a locality. To me however the return of the body to the dust confirms the view which I have taken : for we are expressly told, " that many of them that sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake;" (Dan. xii. 2 ;) and Isaiah exclaims, "Awake and sing ye that dwell in dusty (Isa. xxvi. 19.) There are difficulties however in the way of mjfull conviction, in re- gard to Paradise or Hades being in the heart of the earth. These writers lay great stress, and justifiably, upon the numerous passages of Scripture which speak of the dead as descending, or going down into Hades. But that which creates the greatest difficulty in my mind is, that there are other passages, referring to separate spirits, which de- scribe them as ascending or having ascended. Thus : " All are of the dust and all turn to dust again. — Who knoweth the sjnrit of man that goeth upward, and the spirit of the beast that goeth downward to the earth." (Eccles. iii. 21.) *' Then shall the dust return to the earth as it was, and the spirit shall return unto God who gave it." (Ibid. XII. 7.) ** Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all." — What is this, but the Church, the spirits of the just made perfect, the New Jerusalem which is to come down from God out of heaven ? (Gal. IV. 26 ; Rev. xxi.) For the information of some Readers (and others I trust will excuse it) I may here explain, that the ancient doctrine concerning Hell or Hades does not limit it to a place of torment, as is generally intended by the word Hell in common use ; but includes the places of disembodied spirits, both of the righteous and the wicked ; between whom there is a 96 It is objected by some, that in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus the latter is represented as lying in Abraham's bosom ; and that as he is not made to speak, he must be in a state of repose, and consequently of unconsciousness. This objection, however, arises from not understanding what is meant, in the Eastern style, by lying in the bosom of any ; which was with them the place of favor and distinction. Thus the apostle John is described as lying in the Saviour's bosom ; and thus the Jews, before the time of Christ, said of the righteous dead that they were gone to the hosom of Adam, and the bosom of Abraham ; and, after Christ, believers were said to lie in the bosom of Christ. Besides, the rich man is evi- dently conscious and does converse ; it must therefore be his body only that slept ; and shall we say that the damned enjoy a consciousness which the righteous do not ? II. This point, the consciousness of the spirit in the inter- mediate state, will be more fully established when we consider secondly, that the dead are in a state of holy enjoyment, supe- rior to what they experienced when on earth : for that which proves the latter point, does more eminently confirm the former. St. Paul declares, " that for him to live is Christ, and to die is gain."c I have carefully attended to the arguments which would explain this text otherwise ; — viz. that the Apostle here overleaps the intermediate state, as of no account, and refers his gain by death to the resurrection ; but I cannot at all con- cur mth this view. Surely death would, in the mean while, be a loss to the man, who could say, when living, '* To me to live is Christ /' unless that conscious union -with Christ were still continued to him : for in regard to any merely natural circum- stances we may say, " a living dog is better than a dead lion."d And this continued enjoyment of Christ — yea, and this in- creased enjoyment of him — is fully borne out by the 33rd verse, where the Apostle says, " that he has a desire to depart and be with Christ, which is far better" than remaining in the flesh. separation, likened in the parable of the rich man and Lazanis to " a great gulf.^* The receptacle of the righteous is called Paradise; to which place the spirit of our Saviour went when he gave up the ghost, as is evident from his assuring the thief — " This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise." The receptacle of the wicked is called Tartarus. — The phrase in 2 Pet. ii. 4, *' Cast into Hell'^ is in the original, '^ Cast into Tartarus. ^^ ePhil. I. 21. d Eccles, IX. 4. There is a text even still more explicit ; for it proves, that what the Apostle means by being with Christ is, the enjoy- ment of his visible presence. — " Therefore we are always con- ' fident, knowing that whilst we are at home in the body we * are absent from the Lord ; (for we walk by faith, not by * sight :) we are confident, I say, and willing rather to be ab- ' sent from the body and present with the Lord."e These two Scriptures are very embarrassing to Dr. Burnet and those writers who follow him in this particular ; and they struggle greatly to get rid of their force. I cannot pretend to follow them through all their arguments : I shall select one or two which appear to me to be the strongest. Another Writer in the Morning Watch has translated and given in that work the fourth chapter of Burnet " De statu Mortuorum, &c." adding copious notes ; and as he does full justice to the ori- ginal, and handles the subject ably, I shall quote from his translation. — " Again, in such expressions as we are considering, theob- ' ject is evidently an antithesis : as indeed may easily be re- * marked, both in Corinthians and Philippians ; the words ' " tobe with Christ" being contrasted with our continuance ' in this world. For, indeed, when we quit this life, we are * not extinct, we are not annihilated ; and where are we ? * With God, with Christ : we live mito God. (Luke xx, 38.) * We are present to Christ ; and he will bring us back, flour- * ishing and full of life, with himself also, to the theatre of * this world. We therefore shall not wonder to find St. Paul * exclaiming, " For to me to die is gain." (Phil, i, 21.) We ' are rather surprised that he says so little than that he says * so much in favor of death, w^hen so many evils, so many * troubles, so many perils, so many labors, encompassed him ; * who had endured both hunger and thirst, with cold, and * nakedness, and wounds and stripes, and prisons, and rocks, * and shipwrecks, and every sort of affliction, both by sea and * land. That death should be esteemed more desirable than * such a life, who can wonder ? If it be only rest, and a re- * mission of trials, still it is so far " gain." — Let us, then, learn * to think somewhat more moderately concerning our %VTetch- * ed selves and our reward ; and no longer promise to ourselves * and others the beatific vision of God upon the instant of our * eyes being closed ; when we see the Apostle of the Gentiles • 2 Cor. V. 6—8. 98 * (who of all men best merited any reward which the christian * religion holds forth) presenting no such hope, either to him- ' self or to others." Vol. I, p. 676. His Translator and Commentator begins the subject at vers^ 5 of the above place in Corinthians, and WTites thus : — " *• Now he that hath wrought us for the self- same thing" * — Who is he ? Is it not the Holy Ghost ; the whole God- * head Triune ? — as the Apostle writes : " Now he that hath ' wrought us for the self-same thing is God ! who hath also ' given unto us [already] the earnest of the Spirit ;" therefore * we are always confident, knowing that while w^e are are at * home in this unredeemed body, (which, like the microscope, * is at once tne means of boasted investigation, and at the same * time the preventive of almost all sight ; ) whilst we are en- * veloped with this shroud, the flesh ; while all things are dis- * torted by its impurity and nothing seen aright by reason of * its refraction ; while sin is mingled in our every thought, * and the better they are the more literally that is crucified ; — * *' ivhile we are at home in the body, we are absent from the ' Lord." " P. 672. The first thing I notice in these extracts is, that the Doctor, by coupling the two texts together, adroitly diverts our atten- tion from the antithesis in 2 Cor. v, and treats only of that in Phil. I. The second thing I notice is, that his Translator, when giving his own opinion on the former passage, entirely passes over the important parenthesis, — " For we walk by faith not by sight;" which is nevertheless the key to the right under- standing of the whole. For what may the Apostle mean by these words } To me he appears to anticipate the objection which would immediately present itself to a spiritual man, when *:he Apostle speaks of being absent from the Lord : — How can we be absent from him, when to live is Christ, and every believer walks with him, and enjoys the sense of his presence .' Yes, (answers the Apostle,) we certainly live and walk with him now ; but whilst in the body it is hy faith, and not by sight : but when we are absent from the body, then we shall walk in the enjoyment of his visible presence — by sight and not hy^ faith. This I consider the real antithesis of the passage. If I understand the \4ew which Dr. B.'s Translator takes, it is, that the presence to be enjoyed when apart from the body is a spiritual one ; — the Holy Ghost having given to us an ear- 99 nest now, will then give us a greater fulness. I grant that we have here many drawbacks and hindrances, "which prove a clog upon our spiritual enjoyment ; but in the heart of every be- liever Christ does nevertheless dwell by the Spirit ;f and his body, though vile, is nevertheless the temple of the Holy Ghost. g It therefore destroys the essential distinction between the righteous and the ungodly, to say, that Christ is not with the believer now, in this present life. And it destroys the an- tithesis of this passage ; which is, not the ha\'ing less of the Spirit wlulst in the body, and out of it the fulness ; but the walking in the body with Christ hj faith, and when out of it being with Christ by sight. I must here however observe, that though I feel assured, ■that the enjoyment of Christ with the saints is a visible one ; yet am I equally persuaded, that they have not yet ascended up on high to be present with him in the heavens. Nor is ^uch an opinion at all inconsistent with the ancient notion of Paradise being in the heart of the earth, whether it is really there or not. The material sun is said to be present with us, and is unquestionably seen and felt by us when it shines in our heavens, though it is separated from us by millions of miles : why may not " the Sun of righteousness" equally gladden the saints in Paradise, by some similar manifestation of himself, and communication of his beams from the highest heavens ? Certainly Stephen had such a manifestation, when he cried, — "Behold, I see the heavens opened and the Son of Man stand- ing on the right hand of God." I shall finally notice, in regard to the separate state. Rev. XIV. 13 ; " Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord from ' henceforth : yea, saith the Spirit, that they may rest from ' their labors and their works do follow them." The latter part of this text — " their works do follow them" — I may pro- bably enter upon at some future period : for the present I must confine myself to the other words — " They rest from their la- bors ;" words which, though apparently of a negative signi- fication, do nevertheless, when duly considered, prove that the righteous dead enjoy a decided increase of j905?7zVe blessedness. They will evidently be delivered from all bodily pain and disease, and from all the various corporal evils attendant on f John XIV. 18, 21, 23 ; Rom. viii. 10 ; 2 Cor. xiii. 5. s 1 Cor. VI. 19. 100 poverty, — viz. hunger, thirst, heat, cold and the like. The peasant, the mechanic, the bondman, will likewise have done with all their toil and fatigue : not indeed that the spirit will be without active employment ; for I consider a state of in- ertness to be incompatible with its happiness. And in respect to weariness of the flesh — aye and weariness of the spirit — even christian labors of love are not without their drawback : the very phrase " labor oi love" implies an imperfection. They may be cheerfully entered upon, and they are not unfrequently attended by real gratification ; but yet, alas I through the present infirmity of man, they are a tueari- ness. To visit the abodes of wretchedness, filth, and conta- gion, — to endeavour to bring the spiritually dead to a sense of their danger ; — to instruct the dull, the prejudiced, the un- believing ; — and frequently from all these classes to meet wdth ingratitude in return for our exertions : these things are for the present not joyous but grievous. But the dead rest from all this. In the next place it is a rest from sin — which rest must be one of the most blessed sources of enjoyment to a renewed spirit. He rests from sin outwardly, since he no longer is doomed to dwell with those w^ho vex his righteous soul from day to day by their ungodliness : " there the wicked cease from troubling :"^ there " the Lord hides him in His taberna- cle from the strife of tongues. "i And he rests from the con- flict with sin inwardly. For though whilst in the flesh he is able through grace, to enjoy a dominion over sin, so that he does not obey it in the lusts thereof ; yet he is continually galled and annoyed by its inward emotions. Sometimes when he would enjoy spiritual things, his soul cleaveth to the dust ; — when he would do good, he finds e\dl present with him, (in his motives and tempers perhaps,) and he groans in this body of death being burdened. But, when he dies, he rests from all his warfare, and from his fears, and doubts, and prejudices, and jealousies, and is borne by the angels to the general assembly of the spirits of the just. ^ Job. HI. 17. » Ps. XXXI. 26. Abdiel. 101 Essay IX. THE RESURKECTION STATE. In my last Essay I adverted to the circumstance, that some Christians discourage inquiry concerning the glorified condition of the saints, as if nothing were specifically revealed concern- ing it : and I may add, that there are two passages of Scrip- ture frequently brought forward, as proof that we cannot ar- rive at any satisfactory knowledge on these points. These passages I shaU first notice. The one is 1st Cor. ii. 9 — " Eye hath not seen, nor ear ' heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things * which God hath prepared for them that love him.'* This text is quoted by the Apostle from Isaiah lxiv. 4, to shew how it had come to pass, that the wise and mighty of this world had crucified the Lord of glory, because they did not understand the mysteries of redemption. I need not stay to inquire, whether the things, here said to have been withheld from the perception of man, were the gracious truths and mysteries connected with the present state of salvation, or if they related only to a glorified condition in heaven or on earth : it is sufiicient to observe, that the next verse clearly proves these things, whatsoever they may be, to be revealed under the Gospel to the spiritual man, and only veiled from the eye and the ear and the heart of the natural man. — " But God * hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit : for the Spirit * searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God." {v. 10.) The other place is 1 John iii. 2 — " It doth not yet appear what we shall be." There is in the context of this passage sufficient to lead one to the conclusion, that we do not appre- hend it rightly, if we would so interpret it as to say, we know nothing about our future state. For is it not therein declared, that we are sons of God, and that we shall be like Christ at his appearing ? A careful consideration of the Greek text win I think satisfy the Reader, that the Apostle means not to say, that it has never been declared what we shall be ; seeing that he himself also does declare it in this very place : but that what we shall be hath not yet appeared ^ (that is, the glorified God-man, our great exemplar hath not yet appeared;) but that 102 when HE shall appear we shall be like him.* Thus in Col. iii. 4 we read — " Wlien Christ who is our life shall appear, then * shall ye also appear with him in glory." Whatsoever there- fore is declared of the glorified manhood of the Lord Jesus at the time of his appearing, of that we may conclude the saints will be partakers ; and thus the text, instead of being opposed to the inquiry, would really form an ample foundation on which to raise it. I proceed now to the more immediate consideration of the resurrection state itself. I. It is pretty generally acknowledged among Christians, that the grand purpose of God in redemption is to make such an exhibition of certain of his attributes, as could not other- wise be properly conceived of. It is not sufficient, either for men or angels, that Jehovah should be proclaimed as " the ' Lord, the Lord God, merciful and gracious, long-suffering, ' abundant in goodness, &c. ;" he will be known as such by his actings, so that the universe may have experimental evi- dence of this blessed and glorious truth. I pass however from the general consideration of this point, to its particular bear- ing on redeemed man, which is not, I think, so commonly dwelt upon. For aught we know to the contrary, angels had never wit- nessed an example of the justice and severity of God, until the angels that rebelled were hurled down to Tartarus. But in regard to the rebellion of man, the principalities and powers in heavenly places are to behold a display of the mercy and goodness and love of God : not such a mere ordinary instance of these qualities, as shall only prove that they are divine ; but such an exhibition of them as shall be worthy of Jehovah, affording the most wonderful and exalted specimen of these attributes. To this end man is permitted to fall, and so to fall, that he becomes lower, if possible, than the angels that rebelled ; being " earthly and sensual" as well as " devilish," and thus as it were two-fold more the child of hell than liis deceiver. But God wiU not only pardon him, and reinstate him in his former condition of happiness ; but he hath deter- * OvTTO) e(}>av£pii)9r} ti effofieOa' oiSafisv ds on tav (fntvtpujQri o/jloiol avTif) t(T0fiE6a. There is an evident connexion and identity here between that which is the nominative to tcpavtpioOt) (whatever it may be) and the nominative to ^avepwQt] and the antecedent of avr^y. 103 mined to lavish on him the riches of grace and glor}'.a j^g we read of the eastern monarchs sometimes raising men, ac- cording to the pleasure of their will, from very lowly circum- stances, treating them as special favorites, exalting them among all other princes, presidents and rulers, and sending them forth as those " whom the king delighteth to honour ;" so the Lord Jehovah hath purposed to raise up man as a beg- gar from the dunghill,^ to receive him to his owti bosom, to dwell and walk with him as his friend and familiar, to exalt him in dignity above the angels, giving him to inherit all things as his portion, and in fact only in the throne being greater than him. It will, I trust, be readily admitted, that these things are true concerning the max Christ Jesus : would that they were as fully believed in regard to the elect of God in general ! I am persuaded that we should find this blessed expectation most influential in stirring us up to walk worthy of our high vocation. But so w^onderfuUy is the love of God above aE that we can ask or think, that the saints in every age have need to pray, " that, the eyes of their understanding being ' enlightened, they may know what is the hope of His calling, * and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the ' saints." It may be well, however, before I proceed to prove these things of the redeemed in general, to instance two or three testimonies concerning Christ. As Jesus declares that the Father hath committed all judgement to the Son, because he is the Son of Man f- so St. Paul asserts, that all things are put under him. He only excepted which did put all things under him.d In Ephesians we are told, that God hath raised him ** far above elU principalitj", and power, and might, and domin- ' ion, and ever}^ name that is named, not only in this world, * but also in that which is to come, and hath put all under his * feet."e In Philippians again we read, " that God hath ' highly exalted him, and given him a name which is above * every name : that at the name of Jesus every knee should * bow% &c."f And once more it is written, " that God hath ap- ' pointed him heir of all things ; — that he is made so much * better than the angels, as he hath by inheritance obtained a a Rom. IX. 23; Ephes. i. 7,18; ii. 7; in. 16; Phil. iv. 19. b 1 Sam. II. 8. c Compare John v. vv. 22 and 27. ^ i Cor. xv. 27, 28. e Ephes. i. 20—22. f Phil. ii. 9—11. 104 ' more excellent name than they ; for unto the angels hath he * not put in subjection the world to come whereof we speak ; ' but one in a certain place testified, saying, What is man that * thou art mindful of him ? Thou madest him a little [while] ' lower than the angels ; thou crownedst him with glory and • honor, and didst set him over the works of thy hands ; thou • hast put all things in subjection under his feet/'g Every one acquainted with Scripture must be aware, how readily these passages might be multiplied : and I trust none will be disposed to contend that they relate to the divine nature of our Lord ; since it were absurd to make the circumstances, that he should be above the angels, and inherit all things, the subject of pro- phecy or promise in regard to his deity. Now it is clear to my mind, from the ob\dous tenor of the Scriptures, that, in this exaltation and glory of the manhood of Christ, the saints are to have a direct participation. This may be made evident, first, from a due consideration of one or two of the figures under which they are frequently spoken of in their relationship to Jesus. For example, they are " the body of Christ i"^ and it is difiicult to imagine how honor can be put upon the head, unless the members also are made partakers of it. Again, they are " the bride" or spouse of Christ, whom he nourisheth and cherisheth as his own flesh, and of whose honor he is jealous. i And it is manifest, that when a man is raised to regal dignity, his wife is likewise elevated to the throne ; and her lord would resent an indignity or slight of- fered to his consort, the same as if offered to himself. This latter figure will further sen^e to point out one important dis- tinction as to the relative degree of glory to be respectively enjoyed by Christ and the saints ; for a queen, though she share immediately in all the pre-eminence and splendor and greatness enjoyed by her husband, does nevertheless possess it subordinate to him. It becomes his by inheritance, perhaps, or by conquest : it is hers rather as it is reflected on her by him. She can lay no claim to it in her own right, separate from her lord ; and she enjoys it only because he has set his love upon her, and called her to come and share in his glory. But these things are not merely to be inferred from types and figures, but are declared in more plain and absolute terms. s See the whole of chapters i. and ii. h Ephes i. 23. ' Ephes. V. 23—33. 105 I have shewn in Essays No. V. and VII. that the saints are to sit down in the throne with Christ, and to participate in the judgement ; but some of the things also which are alleged in Scripture to prove this great pre-eminence of Christ, are in other places spoken in respect to the saints. Is the exaltation of Jesus above the angels argued from the circumstance, that God hath never said to one of them. Thou art my Son ?j — " Behold what manner of love the Father hath bestowed on ' us, that we should be called the the sons of God ! Beloved * now are we the sons of God."'*^ Again, is Jesus, being the Son, " appointed heir of all things ?"^ — So the Apostle argues of the saints, " that if children, then heirs — heirs of God, ' and JOINT-HEIRS with Christ ! if so be that we sufer with ' him that we may be also glorified together l""^ — " He that * overcometh shall inherit all things ; and I will be his God, * and he shall be my son,"'^ I cannot take these things as mere rhetorical flourishes, spoken without any definite mean- ing : I view them as blessed and glorious realities, not one jot or tittle of which shall fail : and therefore I cannot conceive, how the saints can be " predestinated to the adoption of chil- dren," and made " joint -heirs with Christ," unless they stand in the next immediate gradation to him in rank and privilege and glory in the kingdom of their Father. For this purpose they are made *' to sit together in heavenly places in Christ * Jesus : that in the ages to come he might shew the exceed- * iNG RICHES of his gracc in his kindness toward us, through * Christ Jesus. "o I know not how others who can receive and realize these truths are affected by them : as for me, though they excite my joy and wonder, yet they fill me with self-loathing and abasement. Before I quit this part of my subject I may here anticipate one particular concerning the enjoyments of the saints ; which is, that their experience does in many respects increase their capacity for spiritual bliss, above that of the Angels. According to our present apprehensions, the measure of our spiritual hap- piness is proportionable to the measure of love shed abroad in the heart by the Holy Ghost. Love is indeed the very essence of the divine nature ;P conformity to which, beyond a question, constitutes our ability to taste of divine bliss. But then our love towards God depends on our sense of the extent of God's J Heb. I. 5, k 1 John in. 1,2. ^ Heb. i. 2. m Rom. viii. 17. n Rev. XXI. 7, o Ephes. n. 6,7. Pi John iv. 16, 106 love and condescension towards us ; especially in the instance of redeeming mercy. He who is conscious of many sins for- given, the same lovethmuch ; " but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little. "q In this respect then the probationary experience of the saints, painful and degrading as it is in the first instance, is by divine grace ultimately overruled to en- hance their sense of God's condescension and goodness. The elect angels, so far as we know, have never sinned ; and there- fore have not been placed in jeopardy by hell-deservdng guilt. They have not been plucked as brands from the burning ; — they have no inward corruptions nor evil world to contend against ; — they have not " come out of great tribulation." Nothing so much enhances our sense of present blessings, as the retrospect of opposite dangers and evils. The comforts of a fire-side are never more appreciated, than when we have been subjected to the pelting and severity of a storm : the refreshment of cooUng shade is best understood by him, who has wandered through desert wastes, exposed to the fury of a vertical sun. The angels' conception of the condescension of God must likewise be inferior to ours ; for we are the immediate objects on whom it is bestowed ; they rather the spectators, who " desire to look into" these things. God hath never identified himself with the nature of angels by assuming it, as he has done ours 'J and in one word, — Christ did not die for them ; and therefore they can only view his mercy as it is exhibited to others. IT. Having, as I trust, established the general position, that in the resurrection the condition of the saints will transcend in glory that of the angels, I pass on to the next consider- ation. In my last Essay I contended, (from 1 Cor. v, 6 — 8 and Phil. I, 21—23,) that the souls of believers are, in the inter- mediate state, in the enjojTnent of the presence of Christ. In what manner they see him and are with him, is not, that I am aware of, revealed ; it is for us to receive the fact itself ; and for the rest, it appears to me the safest to leave it in that obscurity, in which it has pleased God to envelope it. But in regard to the person of the Father, I think it is clearly inti- mated to us, that our formal introduction and presentation to Him does not take place until the period of the resurrection. Though we are now said to be sons, (or rather " sons and daugh- ters, saith the Lord Almighty,"^) yet it is only the Spirit of q Luke VII. 47. r Hebrews ii. 16. s 2 Cor. vi. 18. 107 adoption we have as yet received, which is the pledge and ear- nest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession : the adoption itself being identified with the re- demption of the body, which is also the time of " the manifes- tation of the sons of God."* But as this is an important point in regard to the millennarian view of the Advent and Resur- rection, I shall endeavour to illustrate it further. When the Lord Jesus was risen from the dead he said to Mary, " that he was not yet ascended to his Father ;"^ plainly ' intimating, as I conceive, that Hades or Paradise, from which he was just come, was not the abode of the Father. The same may be inferred from the words of the Apostle concern- ing David ; viz — " David is not ascended into the heavens :"v and the Psalmist himself defers the period of the beholding the face of God in righteousness, until he shall " awake up with God's likeness. "'«■ It would appear also, that the saints are not publicly declared to be the sons of God, until their glorious manifestation : for it is to this period Jesus refers, when he promises, concerning him that overcometh, — " I will ' not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will con- * fesshis name before my Father, and before his angels. "^ And there are various other scriptures referring the time of the saints' introduction to the royal presence, (if I may so say,) to the period of the resurrection. Thus St. Paul expresses his confidence, "^that He which raised up the Lord Jesus shall raise up us also (meaning himself) by Jesus, and ^)ib]1 present us with you"l In the epistle to the Thessalonians he con- nects it ^vith the advent ; praying for their increase in love, " to the end He may stablish your hearts unblameable in holi- ' ness before God, even our Father, at the coming of the Lord * Jesus Christ with all his saints.''^ Similar is the doctrine of St. Jude : "Now unto him that is able to keep you from ' falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his ' glory with exceeding joy, to the only wise God our Saviour, ' be glory and majesty, dominion and power, both now and * ever, Amen." Thus am I compelled to conclude, that man, whilst in the separate state,* hath no access to that light in * There is a curious passage on this head by the ancient author of " Questions and Answers to the Orthodox," bound up in the editions of t Compare Rom. viii. 15, 19, and 23 ; 2 Cor. v. 5, 6 ; Gal. iv. 5, 6 ; Ephes. i. 13, 14. u John xx. 17. v Acts ii. 34. ""^ Psalm XVII. 15. X Rev. III. 5. 7 2 Cor. iv. 14. ^ 1 Thess. in. 13. 108 which God dwells.^ and that he does not visibly behold the glory of God until that time when it shall be announced, — " Behold the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them."b* But there is a yet greater depth in this part of our subject, which remains to be considered. Many expressions in Scrip- ture lead to the conclusion, that the saints are not presented even to Christ until the period of the advent ; and therefore, that in whatever way the saints, when absent from the body, are to be considered present with him, and to behold him by sight and not by faith, it is not in that glorified nature which he will possess, when he comes as " the great God and our Saviour." Thus it is %mtten, that Christ sanctifies and cleanses the Church, " that he may present it to himself a glorious Church, &c.c He bids his disciples pray, that they may be accounted worthy to escape the last tabulation and to stand before the Son of Man ;