tl|p Hibrarg 0f Prtnrrton oClt^iibgtral g>^mtttarg 3S242.5 CRUCIFIXION / JOHN H. OSBORNE WOLCOTT & WEST SYRACUSE, N. Y. 1897 Copyright 1897, By John H. Osborne. preface* It must be apparent to every one careftilly reading the accounts of our Saviour's cruci- fixion, that many of the incidents have never been explained with completeness, nor in a manner consistent with what we know con- cerning the reasons and grounds for crucifix- ion as practiced by the Romans. Among other incidents, the following, viz: the three different kinds of drink of which ''vinegar" was the basis, the method of affixing the body to the cross by three or four nails, the breaking the legs of the victim, the spear- thrust in the side, have all been treated by many writers during these eighteen centuries, who have for the greater part accepted in succession, each from precursors, the same explanations of them, which, from the first, could have been founded only on con- jecture ; therefore, if we would not now pro- ceed upon the same course of mere assump- tion, we must find adequate explanation of them mainly in the modes and customs of Roman military punishment. It is through reasonable inferences drawn from such customs, and particularly from one principle well established in Roman state and military policy, that the attempt at a fairly probable and consistent solution is proposed in the following pages. J. H. O. Auburn, N. Y. It will be seen from the above table of contents that the printer has made an error in the page headings of the last two chap- ters. Contents* Preface, 3 The Roman Method of Crucifixion, 7 The Crucifixion of Jesus, . . .47 Reflections, 78 Ube IRoman /iDetbot) ot Cructflxton. It is singular that so little should ever have been certainly and definitely known regard- ing this, the most cruel and shameful punish- ment inflicted by the Romans. And yet, on reflection, it will not appear so very strange, since we know that detailed and minute de- scriptions of the modes of punishment for criminals have never occupied any prominent place in the popular literature of any time or country. In our own day, for instance, with so much activity in every field of knowledge, the method and machinery used in the capital punishment of hanging are known in their details to very few ; even when some notable criminal is put to death, the daily press (and very properly) seldom gives any elaborate description of the apparatus employed, and the general public is content to kno^sr that in accordance with the sentence pronounced 7 THE ROMAN METHOD by the judge at the close of his trial, the culprit ^was ''hanged by the neck until he was dead." If hanging were universally abolished today, it may be doubted whether, in eighteen hundred or even in five hundred years from now, there would be found ac- counts of the apparatus and process any less fragmentary or more definite than those we have today in regard to crucifixion as prac- ticed in the time of our Saviour. It must be remembered that the cross was not represented as an emblem of our salva- tion during the first 325 years of the Chris- tian era ; it was an abominable and detested thing, as the gallows is now, a symbol of shame and slavery; and therefore, until the time of Constantine, who was the first Ro- man emperor to embrace the Christian relig- ion, there would be no endeavor made by Roman, Jewish or Christian w^riter to pre- serve any account of this dread process for the infliction of death. The little we may know about it is to be gathered from writ- 8 OF CRUCIFIXION. ings in which mention must be made of it from necessity, and only by allusion and as related in an illustrative way to some other topic forming the principal subject of the writing. The apostle Paul frequently alludes to the cross as a symbol of shame and speaks of the offence {<:fcdv8a\ov) of the cross ; and it must have been with great horror, loathing and disgust that any unconverted man should read about Paul's glorying in the cross of Jesus Christ, and that he rejoiced in being daily crucified with his Lord. To a Roman of polished but pagan education, such declara- tions would appear as the extreme aberra- tions of a disordered brain, and Paul would readily be reckoned as among those intellect- ual cranks to any one of whom a Festus might exclaim," Thou art beside thyself, much learning hath made thee mad." There were some incidents attending our Saviour's crucifixion, explanations of which have been offered by writers in commentaries THE ROMAN METHOD and cyclopedias, but they are not at all satis- factory, because they do not account for those incidents consistently and in harmony with what we know of Roman policy and practice in military executions. Two of these incidents are: first, the offer of vinegar mingled with gall to Jesus when on the cross as well as before He was crucified ; and secondly, the breaking the legs of the cruci- fied at the time of their being taken down from the cross. The very inadequate ex- planation of these proceedings is, that they were both acts of mercy; that the vinegar and gall, or, as named in another place, the wine mingled with myrrh, was given in order to partly dull the senses or to stupefy the victim and thus to lessen the pain ; and that the legs were broken as a closing act of the scene in order to hasten death and thus the termination of his misery. These explanations are not admissible, and simply for the reason that thus the period of suffering would be shortened, and they con- lO OP CRVCIFIXIOn. travene the fact that crucifixion was prac- ticed in order that the sufferings of the vic- tim should be as intense and prolonged as possible. It was a niilitarj^ punishment as at first practiced by the Romans, and had its origin in military necessity. Roman policy, as exercised toward the states that were to be subjugated, was essentially a policy of terror ; *' Vae victis ! woe to the conquered ! " was the terrible cry that sounded forth be- fore their armies as they entered upon the bloody work of battle and destruction, and the captives taken were in greater part ap- pointed to death in such manner as would best serve to terrify the people and make them willing, through abject fear, to pass under the Roman yoke. Thus the death by crucifixion, as will appear further on in this paper, was the most cruel that could be devised ; but it would have been most contradictory to the spirit in which that punishment was inflicted, and would have re- vealed a broad inconsistency in the procedure, THE ROMAN METHOD if at any stage the element of mercy had en- tered to relieve, in never so slight a degree, its bitter and protracted suffering. For it was an infliction carefully so ordered that the body of the victim should not be attached at any vital point while he was kept slowly dying " by inches " under the agonies of star- vation and thirst. The suiferer was held for days under the tortures of this living death, unless at times he was fortunately rendered unconscious of his pains by the delirium that accompanied the hard fever and slight loss of blood from the wounds in his hands and feet. Men of fairly strong constitution lasted out this bitter experience during from three to eight days ; the instance recorded of longest survival being nine days; while with the case of a weak or sickly frame the wretched scene might close within the first twenty-four or forty -eight hours, but seldom in less than the time first mentioned. Our Lord's death came when He had been on the cross but six hours, and it is one of the 12 OF CRUCIFIXION. objects of this and another paper to show- why it should have come so soon. The ma- terial contributed by the records is so scanty and vague as to serve merely for a frame work on which to build up our complete account, such as would be furnished by the inferences fairly to be drawn from the extant records of military custom and state policy. That ac- count should proceed upon fair and natural de- ductions made legitimately from known facts of history and custom ; thus may we, haply, make out a rounded and complete story in which there shall be place for all necessary facts and incidents related in the Gospel nar- rative, and each of them shall fall without design into its own place as forming a con- sistent and natural part in the whole sad tragedy. Nearly fifty years ago the discovery of the outermost planet of our solar system was made by a French mathematician, who com- puted the elements of an unknown wander- ing body whose influence had for a long time 13 THE ROMAN METHOD been a source of perplexity to astronomers ; by his advice the telescope was on a specified night turned to a certain point in the heavens, where his calculations had led him to believe that a planet was to be found ; there, in fact, it was, and then for the first time was it entered on astronomers' charts as one of the glorious array constituting our planetary system. Ma3^ we not, therefore, somewhat after the same manner, and with a fair pro- portion of the essential elements at hand, construct an account of a Roman crucifixion that, being in harmony with all known facts, and having all its parts established as true by fact or true by fair inference, each of them shall have such just and proper relation to all other parts as shall commend the whole to our understanding as an acceptable and fully credible representation of a crucifixion scene ? As Agassiz, the naturalist, having the scale of a fossil fish before him, might construct all of its body again from tip to tail, and 14 OF CRUCIFIXION. from that reconstructed form make a true statement of its habits and habitat; as Cuvier, from the tarsal bone of a bird ages ago extinct, might render a complete account of its form and manner of life; so may we, doubtless, from the records, few and scanty though they be, construct an account that will be true, because of the harmony there will be between all related facts and all the in- ferences ^which ''by good and necessary con- sequence may be deduced therefrom." It may be again stated, since the fact is a controlling one and too important to be lost sight of for a moment, that the policy and usage of Rome in her treatment of every na- tion and tribe subdued to her arms was un- varyingly that of the utmost cruelty; and that cruelty was continued in practice until nation, tribe or people had become so com- pletely overawed and reduced that no hope or thought remained to them of opposition to Roman sway. When a Roman general, upon his invasion of a country, had fought a battle THE ROMAN METHOD and gained a victory, he had a large number of captives, both of those taken from the de- feated army and of the unarmed dwellers in cities and villages near the battlefield. They were all diiTerent in class and various in con- dition, and at the absolute disposal of the victor. With the end of subjugation in view, there was no exchange of prisoners, neither could the captives be allowed to go free. There thus remained for them the fate of either slavery or death ; and the only problem before the general was, how to so assort them that those best fitted by education, by trade or other adaptation, could be made useful as slaves in Rome. Such were reserved for the slave market there, and the remaining mass of captives, and generally the far greater part, were made useful to Roman policy in subjugating the country by being put to the slow tortures of starvation ; for after long experience in various sorts of military pun- ishment it had been found that this was the i6 OF CRUCIFIXION. most agonizing and protracted method of torment in all the repertory of cruelty. For the purpose, therefore, of securing the doomed men during the days of gnawing hun- ger, when in desperation they might use any ex- treme violence to escape its agonies, the most simple and obvious method was to bind each of them by cords or withes to a tree or post ; and thus for the great herd of the condemned a wide space near the camp was reserved in which, in addition to the trees growing there, holes were dug for countless posts ; each post was set up by t^wo out of a party of four sol- diers detailed to crucify a victim ; the other two soldiers passed with the condemned man to the nearest wood or to the ruined houses of some village to obtain the cross bar to be affixed at the top of the post or at a suitable height on the living tree, they also provided themselves with ropes or green withes with which to suspend the man from the cross bar; he bore the cross thus provided for his own exe- cution, for the indolent and merciless soldiers compelled him. THE ROMAN METHOD After they had returned in this manner to the place in the field where the upright post had been already set by other cap- tives under direction of the other two sol- diers, the cross bar was securely fixed at the top and then two short stakes of equal length were prepared. These were made with the upper end ''square across," and with the lower end sharpened, and were driven into the ground close beside and nearly in front of the upright post, — being separated from each other by a little space. The tops of these stakes were from six to eighteen inches from the ground, and on these the victim was forced to stand, a foot on each stake, while the four at once attached the cords around his body, and fastened them over the cross bar close to the upright, so that when the stakes had been taken from under his feet the body hung suspended by the cords or withes. It ivas then but a short task to drive a nail through each hand and foot so that the poor wretch might be thoroughly secured against i8 OF CRUCIFIXION. any hope of escape ; for if left without this nailing, the arms and hands might be readily used for untying the cords that suspended him and so escape would be easy during the darkness of the night. Let us now call attention to the absurdities in the representations of crucifixion offered to us by the religious artists of Christendom in the hundreds of paintings and sculptures in the galleries of the Old World. The cross is nearly always made of such height that the victim on it is elevated with his feet almost or quite above the head of one standing on the ground near by. For the earlier events, the cross is shown laid on the ground already completed, with the victim extended upon it and the soldiers are driving nails through hands and feet ; next after this is the scene where the^^ are raising up the cross with the condemned man thus attached only by the nails, to set it in the hole prepared for it. Now all this, while highly pathetic and poetic, is wholly and absurdly improbable and it 19 THE ROMAN METHOD might be said impossible. We cannot follow OUT imaginative painters in these scenes nor accept their presentation of them as suffi- ciently authoritative in the case ; for they had no more reliable accounts of the processes in crucifixion than vv^e of this day have. The stolid brutes who composed the mass of a mercenary Roman army did not, v/e may be quite sure, perform any of their tasks with an eye to the picturesque, the pathetic or the poetic. The lazy and degraded creatures went through their work only to do what was actually necessary for the end in view. They would not make the upright post any longer than would suffice to raise the victim's feet a little from the ground ; and for this pur- pose a height of six or twelve inches would be as good as six feet. They would not first at- tach the cross-bar before setting the upright post because, as they had other condemned men in their charge to crucify, they would make use of them in setting the upright post while others of their own party were looking OP CRVCIPIXION. Up the cross-bar. The rough hewing of a notch or ''revet" at the top of a post could be done before it was set in the hole, and the bar when brought could be quickly nailed in the notch. Nor would they give themselves the needless trouble and delay of completing the cross and attaching the victim while it lay prone on the ground and then raising it all to be set and steadied in the hole till se- cured by the fiUed-in earth. A soldier of any age or country is notori- ous for exercising his -wits to make himself comfortable and avoid every species of labor consistent with the performance of his duty, and we may be confident that every crucifix- ion was performed with strict regard to econ- omy of labor, and not with the least reference to artistic effect. A climax of absurdity is reached when a modern commentator declares that the soldiers raised up the cross with the victim on it and then allowed it to drop into the hole with a heavy thud (!) that it might produce greater pain where the nails passed 21 THE ROMAN METHOD through the sensitive Hmbs ! Where did our wise expositor learn that ? There is also another far greater absurdity in representing the sufferer as attached to the cross only by the nails through hands and feet. The crucifix in art with but very few exceptions has this utterly inept presentation ; for a moment's consideration must suffice to show how ill-fitting it must have been to the actual facts of the case. It would be imprac- ticable for any man to maintain the posture represented by this figure on the crucifix of art, stretched symmetrically upright, the body in its whole length kept parallel with the upright post, the shoulders at nearly a level v^ith the cross-bar, the arms stretched out along the bar at nearly right angles to the body, and thus the whole weight made to rest on the one or two nails through the feet. It would be impossible for any human being by the utmost exercise of muscle and will to maintain such a position for even six minutes, not to say for six hours or days. To 22 OF CRUCIFIXION. declare that he could do this is to go directly against all that we know concerning the limits of human endurance or persistence. The legs could not be thus extended and kept on the tense stretch ; they would be very soon bent outward at the knees so as to let the body downward and forward, and it would then be held and practically supported by the nails through the hands; by this a great weight would be brought upon the two small carpal bones of the hand where the nails passed between them, and upon the fine and lax ligaments uniting them at the first knuckle, and it would be entirely too great for them to sustain ; the delicate bones would be broken and the ligaments ruptured; by this means the wound would be so opened and enlarged as to allow the passage of the nail-head through it, the arm would then be released and the victim would fall from the cross. More than this, accounts all agree that after the doomed man had been on the cross for twenty-four or thirty-six hours, exposed 23 THE ROMAN METHOD to a burning sun by day and to the chilling damps of night, to rain or cold, there came a raging fever and a violent delirium ; in the unconsciousness attending these attacks the body must have been subject to pitiable writhiags and contortions, and unless held by some securer means than nails through the delicate structures of hands and feet, it would surely be loosened and fall. In some cases there was a wooden pin driven into the post about midway to serve as a kind of seat to bear up nearly all the weight of the body ; but this does not relieve the difficulty, for the upper part of the body would still be free to writhe and sway about to a degree sufficient to effect its release from the nails in the hands; the wooden pin at the middle would also serve as a fulcrum, by means of which the arms and legs, as powerful levers, would, in the convulsive throes of a delirious state, cer- tainly and quickly tear the hands and feet from their fastenings. From all these consid- erations we are well warranted in concluding 24 OP CRUCIFIXION. that other means than the three or four nails were of necessity used in keeping the body at- tached to the cross. And here it is pertinent for every one to in- quire, Whence, then, did the unpractical artists obtain the notion of nails as the only means? The answer is not far to seek; it was through a misconception of the exact meaning of the passage in John xx. 25. Our artists were devout men, and were, as they thought, guided strictly by the words of the Divine Book, and since, in the only place where mention is made of any of the instru- ments of crucifixion, the nails alone are allu- ded to, the painters forthwith concluded that these were exclusively the means used for at- tachment to the cross. But Thomas' declar- ation was made not for the purpose of set- ting forth an exhaustive description of the method of crucifixion, but for another and entirely different purpose ; he was seeking for evidence of the identity of the body of this man, alleged to be that of Jesus, with the 25 THE ROMAN METHOD body of his Master whom he knew they had applied to the cross, and he sought for that evidence in the marks that could be left by only one class of the instruments of crucifix- ion, namely, the nails. Thomas did not add, '* Except I shall also see on His body the red marks left b^^ the ropes that suppported Him, I will not believe; " Thomas knew better than to say that, for it was now the eleventh day since Jesus had been suspended by the ropes, and during eight days of those eleven the blood had been coursing through His revived body, all the functions of life were again in full and vigorous exercise, and the red marks made by the ropes had therefore disappeared. It was a strange error for artists to adopt summarily the conclusion that the sole men- tion by Thomas of the nails implied the sole use of them as the affixive appliances for the crucifixion of our Lord. Thus with close adherence to all elements of the practical, and also of the probable, where- ever statements of fact have failed in this 26 OP CRUCIFIXION. study of our subject, we find that the conclu- sions of the cyclopedists need to be modified by the substitution of one Httle word for another Httle one; they all agree that the vic- tim was affixed by ropes or nails, it needs that *' and " be put in place of ^^ or," and then the statement, by ropes and nails will be in accord with what was the fact in every in- stance. The weight of the sufferer being thus wholly borne by the ropes or withes which held him suspended, we may consider in what manner and by what portions of the body he could be hung so as best to fulfil the object for which he was crucified; for it may be again repeated that the purpose was to pro- long life to the utmost, that he might undergo the fullest measure of torment from starva- tion and thirst. During the long and frequent wars waged by Rome, and with the constant practice of this mode of torture in her continued and un- varying course of conquest, the Roman sol- diers in crucify ing their thousands of captives » 27 THE ROMAN METHOD must have become adepts in the art. Con- stant opportunities for observation would teach them that victims suspended by certain portions of the body would survive much longer than when suspended by other por- tions; they would find that ^where a red swelling carhe in consequence of stricture by the rope, there heat and fever would occur, the inflammation would be followed by sup- puration and mortification, and then by a gan- grene which would all too quickly terminate the sufferer's life. We of this day know that if any of the limbs had been bound by the ropes for sus- pension, there would have been a stoppage of the circulation of the blood and then would have ensued the consequences just above stated ; the soldiers, of course, knew nothing about the circulation of the blood, but ex- perience acquired from repeated observation would ere long indicate to them by what parts suspension could be made so as to per- mit of longest duration of life; manifestly, 28 OF CRUCIF^IXION. then, the method concluded on would be, as the man stood on the two stakes at the foot of the post and with his back against it, to pass the rope around the waist and just un- der the ribs, then tie it with a hard knot mod- erately tight, leaving the knot at the middle of his back, then the two ends of the rope, being long enough, were passed over the cross-bar close to its junction with the post, and a turn or two around the post would make all secure ; then the nails through hands and feet would prevent any violent movement of the body, and particularly would keep the hands from any attempt to untie the rope. Held in such wise, there would be pressure ex- erted by the sufferer's weight only on the soft and yielding viscera of the abdomen, on the ribs and other framework near to the ex- terior, but no constriction could be brought on any large vein or artery to cause obstruc- tion or hindrance to the circulatory flow. After such simple methods were the doomed men prepared for their horrible fate ; and to 29 THE ROMAN METHOD the number of hundreds, sometimes of thou- sands, they were set up on crosses without the camp. . Josephus relates that at the siege of Jerusalem by Titus there could not be found wood enough to erect crosses for all the prisoners condemned to that death. The crucifixions were occasions of rare sport for the degraded soldiery; they gloried in the mockery, the jibes and insults that could be freely flung into the faces of the condemned ; in the hearts of such men, unsoftened by any influence of Christian civilization, were har- bored no feelings of pity or mercy, their words, albeit often in a language unknown to those on the cross, were yet sufliciently in- terpreted to the victims by glaring eyes and gestures of hate, and by acts of cruelty and brutality. During the days through which the sufferers survived, their torments would be the sport and jest of the executioners, and when, from the loss of blood at the wounds, from the bitter pangs of hunger and thirst, and also 30 OP CRUCIFIXION. from exposure to the scorching heat, a raging fever had come upon the victim by the second or third day, then the pleasure of the hard- ened brutes was greatest ; they gloated over the pitiable throes and convulsions, and took delight in the groans, shrieks and curses of the hapless sufferers. So through the long drawn hours of every day did their besotted natures find interest and entertainment in the hard wretchedness of the crucified; through the day indeed, but not through the night. For then came the soldiers' time for sleep, and no sleep was possible if these awful cries from the field of torment near to camp came to fill their ears; for the delirium and fever would not end with the day but continue unrelieved through the hours of night. The cries must be stopped during the night if the soldier would have his rest undisturbed, there- fore some means must be provided for closing the mouths and hushing the voices of these raging men. An infernal drink was made whose corrosive 31 THE ROMAN METHOD and astringent qualities admirably served this purpose ; a vinegar of scarifying acidity that resulted from the acetous fermentation of a strong wine, received a strong admixture of gall, a vegetable product; and this, when administered in such scant quantity on a bunch of hyssop as to just moisten the mouth and throat, hotly parched and swollen to great tenderness as they were, would by its irritating and rasping influence corrugate and constrict the throat and paralyse the vocal cords. So with a pail of the mixture and with hyssop tied at the end of a stick, the watch specially detailed at night for this duty, passed everywhere among the groves of crosses, offering the vile stuff" to every one they heard crying out ; and eagerly was the little sop received ; for it was at least, moist- ure, — a semblance of the pure drink they were longing and moaning for; but the next mo- ment came the hard gripe of acid and gall, in- creasing their suffering, closing the throat and almost stopping the breath. Thus was quiet 32 OF CRUCIFIXION. secured for the night by the guard furnished with vessels of vinegar mingled with gall, until the daybreak came and the awakening of the camp, when these duties were no longer required, and the victims resumed their mournful cries as one by one they recovered from the effects of the bitter mixture. So through the days of suffering and nights of horror when even the poor relief of a cry was denied them, did the heavy hours of tor- ture pass ; by the end of the second day many of those with weak constitutions would be relieved by death, others in greater number would succumb during the third, fourth and fifth days, by the sixth and seventh only those of greatest vitality would survive, and by the seventh or eighth day the last of them had passed away, all having been kept on their crosses till death. But what w^as to be done with those remaining alive, if, on any day be- fore the eighth, military policy or necessity re- quired the removal of the army ? They must not be released, nor must they be left to be 33 THE ROMAN METHOD rescued by friends and relatives and in a con- dition to be nursed back to life and health after the army had withdrawn ; nor, on the other hand, should their torment be brought to a merciful end by a spear thrust in some vital part, but some way must be devised for rendering the short remnant of their lives still a prolonged misery even after their rescue by friends when the army had gone. Such a way was found ; just before depart- ure, the guard with clubs passed among the crosses, and whenever the doomed one on any of them gave signs of life, a blow on each leg broke the bones, and so the poor wretch, even if delivered and restored to freedom, was for- ever a helpless cripple from the compound fractures of his legs. There was little surgi- cal skill among those barbarous peoples to amend so great a disaster ; the victim must suffer on till death, his onh^ comfort being in the sympathy and alleviating cares rendered at the hands of his friends. The offering of the vinegar and gall and the 34 OF CRUCIFIXION. leg-breaking have both, in the absence of pos- itive knowledge on the subject, been wrongly interpreted as acts of mercy ; the drink, it is asserted, was intended as a stupefying potion to dull the pain by taking away in whole or in part the consciousness of the victim ; and the breaking of the legs it is said, was for the purpose of hastening death and so giving quicker relief to the intolerable suffering ; but such theories are wholly inconsistent with the policy of utmost cruelty practiced by the Romans. To have rendered any one insensible to pain or suffering would have been to defeat the very object in view ^vhen he was attached to the cross ; and if there had been any real purpose to shorten the misery of the ^wretched men, a spear thrust into the heart would have effected that result much sooner and more surely than the leg-breaking. And fur- ther, no stupefying effect could be produced by the vinegar and gall, indeed, it would have a result entirely the opposite ; and breaking the legs would not necessarily hasten death ; 35 THE ROMAN METHOD it might in some case accidentally happen that some small and sharp slivers from the broken bone might be driven through the wall of the femoral artery or femoral vein, and so death would immediately result. Doubtless this happened in the case of the penitent thief, and so the promise of our Lord to him would be fulfilled, " Today shalt thou be with me in Paradise." But yet the men who gave the blows knew nothing about arteries and veins, so that death by loss of blood in this way, being a mere contingency, we cannot conclude that such an end was calculated on or looked for by the executioners. As the soldiers detailed for this leg-breaking duty passed the doomed men in review, many would be found with life so nearly gone as to present almost the semblance of death; the exhausted body was still, the heart worn out by fever and pain, had nearly ceased to beat, or at least its throbs were so feeble as to send the blood slowly to the inner parts of the body, leaving the exterior so little colored by 36 OP CRVCIPIXIOM. it as to induce belief that the pallor indicative of death had already come; so there was doubt whether the victim yet lived or might be only in a faint; that doubt was quickly and brutally solved by the thrust of a spear into his side; if blood in its natural state followed, the sufferer was yet living and his legs were broken ; but if no blood or if blood separated into white scrum and red fibrine as we of this day know it, came forth, he was dead, and the soldiers would not uselessly waste their strength in giving the unneces- sary blows with their clubs. In conclusion, we will quote a few passages from some of the ancient classics that throw some light on the practice of crucifixion. Plautus, Mostellaria, I. i. 52, etc. (Quarrel of two slaves in the house of an absent Athenian merchant, Grunio and Tuanio). ** Grunio. O, riddle for the executioner, as I guess it will turn out ; they will be so pinking you with goads as you carry your gibbet someday along the streets, as soon as the old gentleman comes back. 37 THE ROMAN METHOD Tuanio. How do you know that fate will not happen to you sooner than to me ? Grunio. I never deserved it; you did, and do now." Here the word ' ' gibbet ' ' is derived from a Latin word meaning to spread out; it is a noun, the name of the transverse beam of a cross, holding fast the outstretched arms of the culprits. Cicero, Pro Rabirio, IV. 11. (On the in- iquity of crucifying a man who was a Roman citizen). *' Which of us, then, Sabienus, is really the friend of the people ? You, who think that Roman citizens need to have the hangman at hand and handcuffs ready, even at a public meeting ; you, who order the cross to be fixed and set up for the death penalty of Roman citizens in the very Campus Martins, a spot consecrated by the Auguries, where the Comitia Centuriata are held? Or I, who forbid the meeting to be tainted by the ex- ecutioner's presence, who declare that the Forum of the Roman people must be cleansed from all traces of so infamous a crime, who would have the assembly pre- served untainted, the Campus sacred ground, the body of all the citizens of Rome undefiled, 38 OF CRUCIFIXION. and who maintains that the right of liberty must be preserved intact ? "§12. Yes, this democratic tribune of the people is the guardian, then, the defender of our rights and liberties! The Porcian law abolished flogging for all Roman citizens; this tender-hearted creature brings the scourge back again. The Porcian law destroyed the power of the lictor over the liberty of a Ro- man citizen; Sabienus, the people's friend, hands him over to the executioner. C. Grac- chus brought in a bill that no Roman citizen should be indicted on a capital charge with- out your consent ; yet this " democrat," with- out your consent, has compelled the two commissioners not (as was legal) to frame a decision concerning a man who was a Roman citizen, but to convict a Roman citizen on a capital charge without even a hearing. "§13. And yet you, j^ou talk to me about the Porcian law, about Caius Gracchus, about the people's liberties, about friends of the people, forsooth ! you, v^ho have attempted, not only by unwonted punishments but even in speeches of unheard of ferocity, to violate the liberty of this people, to make trial of their endurance, to change their customs ! This is the sort of thing that pleases you, who call yourself a merciful and "democratic" man! "Go, lictor, bind his hands," a formula which not only does not belong to the present state of civilization, but was not even used 39 THE ROMAN METHOD by Romulus or Numa Pompilius ; the word- ing belongs to the tortures devised by that arrogant and cruel king, Tarquin. Doubtless a kind-hearted ''democrat" like you can re- member them; "Veil his head, hang him to the barre-i tree," words which, gentlemen of Rome, have long been lost for this state, not only in the twilight of antiquity, but in the light of liberty too. "§16. Now, if we must have death, let us die free men ; let there be no talk of hangmen and veiling heads ; let us get rid of the very name of the cross, not only from the whole body of Roman citizens, but from our eyes, our ears, our very thoughts. For it is not only the doing and the suffering of such things, but even the circumstances, the thought, the open reference to them are un- worthy of a Roman citizen, and a free man. Shall the generosity of masters free, with a single touch of the staff of manumission, their slaves from the dread of all such punish- ments and 3^et neither our past history, nor our achievements, nor the dignified posts which you fill, free us from the lash, from the hook, from the terror, even, of the cross." [The copyist who furnished the foregoing from Cicero remarks with entire truth, that Cicero is here guilty of special pleading for rhetorical purpose; — his vague allusions to 40 OP CRUCIFIXION. Tarquin, the omission of the important word reste, *'by a rope," in the formula, Infelici arhori^ etc.] Justiniis the historian and annalist, XXII. vii. 8 and 9 (concerning Bomilcar the Carth- aginian who intended to desert to Agathocles the Sicilian tyrant). **§8. For this crime he was fastened to a cross-bar by the Carthaginians in the midst of the Forum, that the same spot which had formerly furnished a distinction for the good, might be a record of his punishment. '' §9. But Bomiclar bore the cruelty of the citizens with a great heart; so that he in- veighed against the crime of the Carthagin- ians from the top of his cross as from a tribunal. ^'^ § And when he had shouted these words to a great assembly of the people, he expired." Ansonius Idyllia VI. 54. (Crucifixion of Cupid in the infernal world. ) '* Trembling with fear and vainly seeking a refuge, they dragged him forth into the crowd in the midst of the throng. A well-knov^n myrtle tree in a gloomy shade is chosen, detested through the punish- ment of the gods. There had Proser- 41 THE ROMAN METHOD pina crucified Adonis, scorning him because mindful of Venus. Amor, hanging from a lofty branch of this tree, hands bound behind his back, bewailing the fetters shackling his soles, they torture with no mild punishment. A defendant without an indictment, a pris- oner condemned by no judge, — such was Amor." Plautus, Miles Gloriosus, IV. 19. (Two servants, Palaestrio and Sceledrus, are talk- ing scandal with the mistress of their master.) ^^ Palaestrio. I think that in that self-same position you will have to die outside the gates, when with hands outstretched, you will be carrying your cross. (Sceledrus, the slave addressed, is standing at the moment before the door v^ith arms stretched out to bar entry. The allusion to the ''gate" is probably to the Esquiline or Rhetian gate at Rome, near the place v^here slaves were pun- ished.) Sceledrus. Don't threaten; I know the cross will (as a matter of course) be my end. There are all my ancestors, father, grand- father, grandsire, greatgrandsire. Enough; my eyes cannot be torn out by any threats of yours." Valerius Maximus, II. 7, 12. '' Nothing could be more mild than the elder Africanus. Yet for the establishment of mili- 42 OF CRUCIFIXION. tar3^ discipline he thought it convenient to bor- row something of severit^^ from his own lenity. For having taken Carthage and gotten into his power all those that had fled from the Ro- mans to the Carthaginians, he more severely punished the Roman than the Latin fugitives. For the first, as deserters of their country, he nailed to the cross ; the other, as perfidious allies, he only beheaded. I shall not urge this act any further, both because it was Scipio's, and for that it is not fitting that a servile punishment should insult our Roman blood, though deservedly shed ; especially when we may pass to other relations not dipped in domestic gore." Seneca, Consolatio ad Marciam, xx. 3. *'I see there crosses, not of one kind only, but constructed in one fashion by some, in another by others. Some have hung the vic- tims head downward to the earth, others have driven a stake through the entrails, others have stretched out the arms on the patibulum (cross-bar of the cross). I see cords, I see the lash, and separate engines (of torture) for the limbs and individual joints : but I also see death. There are blood-thirsty enemies, there are haughty citizens, but there too I see death. Slavery is not grievous if a man may at one step pass away into liberty when his master is weary of him ; as defence against the cruelties of life, I have the kind- ness of death." 43 THE ROMAN METHOD Lipsius de Cruce, II. 1. ''Not without reason did Cicero call the cross ' a most cruel and loathsome death ' and the poet Nonnus terms it ' a most crim- inal fate.' Moreover lawyers speak of it, owing to its (evil) pre-eminence as the 'ex- treme penalty.' " Paulus, Julius P. (A. D. circa 200) says: " They are all the extreme penalty, viz ; the cross. Ulpian calls it supreme: 'if the ac- cused are free, they are given to the wild beasts ; if slaves tlie^^ suffer the supreme pen- alty.'" Certainly Paulus enumerates the three su- preme penalties in this order: "the cross, burning, beheading;" the cross, as you see, stands first ; and with reason, if you expect to find in such punishment disgrace, magni- tude, and especially long duration. Juvenal, Satire, VI. 219-223. (A slave is to be crucified for a mere whim ; he has done nothing to deserve it, but apparently that does not weigh with his ow^ner.) " Prepare a cross for the slave. "What has the slave done to deserve his punishment ? 44 OF CRUCIFIXION. "What witness is present? Who has pros- ecuted ? " You shall hear. There is never a long de- lay in the case of a man's life. "Oh, you idiot! is a slave a human being then? " He did nothing, I grant ; it is my will, and I give orders accordingly; such is my com- mand. "My desire may stand for a reason (if you require one)." Horace, Satires, I. iii. 80-83. "Were a master to crucify his slave be- cause, when told to remove a dish, he licked up the half-eaten fish and the half-cold sauce, men in their senses would count him madder than Labeo." Horace lived nearly a century before Juvenal ; he reflects the disintegration of so- ciety, which had advanced with rapid strides under the vicious emperors since Horace's age. Plautus, Poenulus, IV. ii. (Syncerastus, a slave, is speaking of some treachery of his.) " If my master learns that I have breathed a word to a single mortal, he will have changed me from Syncerastus into a leg- broken object in double-quick time," 45 THE ROMAN METHOD Livy, I. 26, §6. " The law was worded in dire strains : ' Let two commissioners decide re per dnellio.' If the defendant shall have appealed from their decision, the case shall be contested with them on the appeal; if they shall prevail, the defendant shall veil his head and be hanged by a rope to a barren (that is, accursed) tree; and he shall be scourged within and without the city's sacred limits." 46 Zbc Cructfixton ot Jesus. From the conclusions to be drawn from statements in another paper on the ''Roman Method of Crucifixion," it will appear that some new and interesting questions arise con- cerning certain facts and incidents attending the crucifixion of our Lord. The most strik- ing and important of these is the fact of His untimely death after He had been suspended but six hours on the cross ; other facts are : the unnatural darkness during the last three hours of His execution ; the earthquake ; the opening of the graves of many holy people preparatory to the resurrection of their bodies three days afterward, simultaneously with, or soon after, the rising of His own body. Another incident, quite singular, is, that when they came to Calvary and before attaching Jesus to the cross, they offered Him wine mingled with gall, according to Mat- 47 THE ROMAN METHOD thew, or wine mingled with myrrh, accord- ing to Mark ; this was an unprecedented act, and may properly first claim our attention. It is very certain that the chief priests and scribes were the ruling and directing powers through all the pitiless scenes of that day from the beginning at the house of Annas, during all the mockery before Pilate, and at Calvary till the close of the tragedy. These easily swayed the wicked and abandoned rabble to do v^hatever they suggested ; this draught of wdne, therefore, was provided by their direction, and it may be taken for grant- ed that it was brought there to be offered to Jesus from no kindly or merciful motive. What, then, were the motives ? We may first review a few facts precedent. Our Lord had reached the hill of Calvary in a very faint and weary condition ; He had been without rest or sleep all the night, had passed through an experience very exhausting to soul and body in the garden of Gethsemane,had taken no breakfast, and no meal the night previous 48 OF CRUCIFIXION. except that light one of the passover with its bitter herbs ; yet with all this His mind was clear, and His voice strong to utter all His thought. Just now, at nine o'clock, was a critical time for the chief priests and scribes ; they could attach Him to the cross, but there might be danger of a rescue by His country friends abiding in the city just after cele- bration of the Passover. These were in such overwhelming numbers as to be able to over- awre and overpower resistance coming from any quarter that would try to prevent a forcible rescue of Jesus from the cross ; and if they were to come to Calvary in any great numbers, but few words of appeal would be needed from His mouth to induce them to take such action. To close that mouth, there- fore, seemed to them a most needful measure ; an offer of wine with myrrh before being placed on the cross might lead Him to think they gave it to Him out of pity for His ex- hausted state, and that they would not offer Him the usual vinegar and gall after He had 49 THE ROMAN METHOD been placed there ; and so, when thirst and fever should come upon Him, He would, in His confused state, the more willingly take the latter drink, deceived by the thought that it was the same pleasant wine and myrrh offered Him before. But the Divine Man knew how ''they thus reasoned within their hearts," and so, "when He had tasted thereof He would not drink ; " not that He desired a rescue, for He knew that the darkness and earthquake soon to come would so bewilder all men, friends and foes alike, that little or no thought would, by the mass of them, be given to any one of those three crucified on Calvary. No stress is to be laid, on the diiference between Matthew and Mark, the former giv- ing the ante-crucifixion drink as wine and gall in place of wine and myrrh ; the mixture of vinegar and gall always regularly provided at crucifixions to be given during the hours of night to hush the cries of the crucified was also at hand, and it would be natural for 50 OP CRUCIFIXION. Matthew, having written his Gospel (as it is said) after Mark's was written, to have be- come confused in his recollection as to the two kinds of drink, and make the unimportant mistake of putting gall for myrrh. The darkness and earthquake may nowr claim attention, both supernatural events. The darkness was ordered in the loving coun- sel of the Heavenly Father doubtless for two purposes; the first, that which has been already noted, to turn men's minds away from thought of rescuing Jesus, and the second, to cover His head in the day of battle from the heat of the noon-tide sun, that so in the cool darkness, no weakness or trouble of the afflicted and fevered body might cloud or disturb His intellect, nor any disorder of the brain come in to hinder Him in the awful con- flict with the powers of hell. The earthquake was sent in order that the graves of those saints appointed for this miracle might be seen and proved by many witnesses to have been opened by no human 51 THE ROMAN METHOD hand, so that during the three days interven- ing before the resurrection of Jesus, the re- markable fact might be established beyond doubt by those who, in that time, should have examined those same riven tombs, that their occupants had actually come forth after Jesus himself had risen, and that they "had entered into the holy city, and had appeared unto many." The recorded words of Jesus spoken while on the cross, were uttered after the darkness came; before that, the air was filled with mockings and jibes by the chief priests and the abandoned cre^w v/hom they led and in- spired; and our Lord would prefer, on His part, to maintain that silence which ever be- comes the innocent in the face of a horde of unjust and malicious, but powerful and suc- cessful, accusers. But when the noonday darkness came over the land, the appalled and cowardly mob passed quickly off the scene, and only the vengeful leaders, the near rela- tives and friends, with the four soldiers and 52 OP CRUClPlXTON. centurion on duty were left as His compan- ions there; these soldiers, stolid and brutal as ever under their iron discipline, had been, by instigation of the rulers (who all the morning had been fearing a rescue), offering the vinegar and gall, contrary to the usual custom, during the time of broad daylight, but now, in the darkness, and when Jesus had sent forth the cry, *'My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? "these soldiers, under- standing none of the Aramaic language in which it was uttered, conceived it to be of the same sort of disordered raving they had so often heard on the crucifixion field ; and so we read the very natural statement that one of them, without prompting from any one, did according to the usual custom, ran to offer Him the abominable stuff that should close His throat and stifle His voice. But the cu- riosity of the ignorant leaders, who knew not the tenor of Jesus' words, forestalled the offer of the drink, ''Let be, let us see whether Elijah cometh to take Him down ; " and thus 53 THE ROMAN METHOD the power of speech was, tinder the Father's providence, preserved to Jesus, that He might utter His last ever memorable words. The chief priests and scribes had always taught that Elijah must first come before the Messiah, and if he were actually to come now and at this call, Jesus would have furnished himself the proof, to them, of the falsity of His claim totheMessiahship, fornow Elijah comes after Him, whereas he should come before. Soon the appointed moment came for Him to close the mournful scene; ''there was set there a vessel full of vinegar; " this was the common, sour, cheap wine such as the sol- diers could afford to have as a regular drink ; this vessel of vinegar (of course without either gall or myrrh) was there as provided for themselves, when, having completed the task of execution, and with a long, idle day before them, ''sitting down, they watched Him there," as they had often done before at similar scenes ; thus with the means for play- ing games of chance, and with a cheap sour 54 OP CRUCIPIXION. drink each crucifixion party passed each hot, monotonous day of their watch. Our Lord now, in order that His vocal organs might be for an instant clear and strong, invited the drink by the words, *'I thirst; " there was no delirium in His speech, and the centurion, seeing it really a case of thirst, doubtless bade the soldiers give Him the vinegar ; he was obeyed ; and then, with soul fully relieved and resigned, Jesus cried with a loud voice, '^ It is finished. Father, into thy hands I commit my spirit," and having so said. He bowed His head and yielded up His spirit. The centurion w^as amazed: through all his long experience in crucifix- ions, he had never known a similar case ; the earthquake and the darkness might have impressed him, although he had known and felt such before, but here was a man pray- ing for his murderers, silent under the scorn- ful taunts of his enemies, innocent of crime, as Pilate, his own general, had testified ; and yet he had declared himself forsaken of God; after 55 THE ROMAN METHOD all these mutually contradictor3^ events, came the astounding climax of the man's death after having been but six hours on the cross ! "Truly, this man was a Son of God!" was the cry of the pagan centurion, in whose system of belief a Son of God was a demi- god, a man endowed by the principal gods with irresistible power over some particular forces in the celestial or earthly realm. But what was the cause of our Lord's death at so early a period in His execution? We have already seen that victims would remain alive on the cross for many days, yet here was one dying when but the fourth part of one day had elapsed. There was no natural reason for the death at the end of six hours. Jesus was in the prime and vigor of full man- hood, in perfect health, with constitution un- impaired ; under the operation of the natural laws of life. He might be kept on the cross and live for three or four days at the least : the recorded cases of endurance and survival of the crucified leave no doubt to us on this 56 OP CRUCIFIXION. point. The death of our Lord, therefore, must be considered miraculous. The most notable solution of the problem hitherto offered, is that which attributes His death to rupture of the heart, the result of, and climax to a period of intense agony of mind, and the one circumstance on which this conclusion is predicated is that of the final cry, ''He cried with a loud voice, and yielded up his spirit." But before treating of this event, let us con- sider some incidents connected with the post- mortem conditions. Joseph of Arimathea, having learned, probably from John, that Jesus was really dead, went to Pilate and asked for the body, his request being made about the same time but possibly a little be- fore that of the chief priests and Pharisees, that the three bodies should be taken down and not suffered to remain on the crosses over night; they preferred this request in compli- ance with that injunction left them by Moses, and recorded in Deut. xxi. 22. 23. To Pilate also, the news of Jesus' death was unexpect- 57 THE ROMAN METHOD ed ; he doubted the truth of the report, but when it was confirmed by the centurion , the request of Joseph was granted, involving as it did a compHance with that of the chief priests. Great credit must be given to Joseph of Arimathea for his clear-sighted shrewdness in forestalling the enemies of Jesus by his own request ; for if these latter had obtained His body, they assuredly would not have left it unbroken and sound ; that their disappoint- ment was extreme was evidenced by the fact of their second request made to Pilate for a watch to be kept over the body in the tomb ; urging for it the very natural reason that He, a deceiver, having prophesied while yet alive, that he would be raised from the dead the third day, his disciples, to carry out the deceit and to fulfil the prophecy, would steal away His body. But under this hollow pretence was con- cealed their real fear, the fear that this death, occurring so early, beyond any reason or pre- 58 OP CRUCIP'IXIOM. cedent, might after all be simulated or might be a fainting fit, due to a temporary exhaus- tion, and that when he had been concealed in a tomb which was in the care and keeping of his friends, he might soon, under the influence of restoratives, be brought back to conscious- ness; so they ''made the sepulchre sure, the guard being with them ;" that guard was placed there to prevent any one from going in rather than to hinder the occupant from com- ing out ; for, if the former contingency were to happen, then indeed as they declared, the last error of leaving a body with unbroken legs in the hands of its friends would have been worse than the first error of not hav- ing had its bones broken before being taken from the cross. Indeed, it was of the ut- most consequence to these powerful enemies of our Lord, that he should never come down from the cross in a sound condition: for think, for a moment, of the cool diabolism involved in all their plans : during the early morning they were leading the dissolute mob 59 THE ROMAN METHOD in the demand to ''crucify Him," and all that while, they knew that Jesus, if cruci- fied, must not remain on the cross after six o'clock of the same day ; feeling therefore cer- tain that He would be alive at that time, they were equally certain that according to the rigid and unvarying Roman practice, His legs would be broken ; thus, during all the six hours of the crucifixion, they were so confi- dent of this result, and felt so secure of the success of their conspiracy, that they still led on and incited the mob in their cries, "Let Christ, the King of Israel, now come down from the cross, that we may see and believe ; " "He saved others, Himself He cannot save; let Him come down and we will believe;" " Thou that destroyest the temple and build- est it i n three d ays , s ave thyself. ' ' The break- ing of the legs was the one result confidently reckoned on in all their venemous calcula- tions; for then He might be delivered alive and without protest to His friends and rela- tives ; if He should then die, His body would 60 OF CRUCIFIXION. bear the marks of dishonoring crime in the broken limbs ; but if He survived, it would be as a cripple maimed for life ; He would be a wretched burden to Himself and friends dur- ing many and helpless years of lingering pain. Here would be the triumph of the priestly adversaries ; no more would He pass through cities and villages teaching and preaching His abominable doctrines ; if ever able again to w^alk, no one would ever listen to Him ; for it was a law, if not written, yet sanctioned by universal maxim, that any mind, to be sound and entitled to teach sound precepts to others, must be housed in a sound body; thus dis- credited, and His person ever proclaiming its own dishonor in the sight of all men, His mis- sion as a teacher and leader must come to an end. They were dumbfounded at the untimely and incomprehensible decease of Jesus at so early a stage of the execution ; their plot was by it entirely defeated, their plans altogether foiled ; this impostor who had so plainly said 6i THE ROMAN METHOD to all the world that after three days in death he would rise again, was now about to be put in the tomb with unviolated bod^^ and that too, in the charge and custody of his friends ; nothing now was easier than for His disciples, if the tomb w^ere left unwatched and they thus unhindered, to enter at the right appointed moment, bring Him forth, and de- clare that He had risen from the dead ; so the guard was set, and we all know with what futile result. They were brave and effective enough against human invaders of the tomb, but fled from the presence of one of the heav- enly host. John, in his record, lays special emphasis upon this omission to break the legs as posi- tive evidence of the fact that Jesus was really dead ; and also puts like emphasis upon the other singular appearance, that of the blood and water following the spear thrust in His side, and he three tiines reiterates the credi- bility of his own testimony — "and he that hath seen hath borne witness, and his witness 62 OF CRUCIFIXION. is true ; and he knoweth that he saith true, that ye might beHeve," That omission to break the legs John regarded as proof posi- tive of the actual death of Jesus and that He was not in any faint or trance. And the blood and water from the \vound was ad- duced as proof of the unusual nature of His death ; for in the body of the ordinary victim dying on the cross after daj^s of exhaustion from maceration and fever, the blood would by slow degrees be wasted, the heart would grow weaker as vitality day by day receded ; and as the end drew near, it would throb ever more slowly and intermittingly, until at the last, its final pulsations might be hardlj^ de- tected ; it is evident that with the blood being daily appropriated in maintaining and repair- ing the wasting tissues, little or none of it would remain in any artery or vein of the starved-out sufferer, and then a spear thrust into the body would elicit little or no blood at all. But out of the wound in Jesus' side came blood and water. That decomposed 63 THE ROMAN METHOD state could only exist in the case of a person dying as niiraculousl}^ as did Jesus, when the heart in full and regular action would in an instant come to a complete stop ; so that the blood in its flow would be at once arrested, being kept in the arteries and veins, and in the lungs also and liver. The blood, how- ever, in this condition, would at once begin to separate into its different parts as above indicated. In all cases of the death of ordinary mor- tals the last contraction of the heart is made with great force in such wise as to expel all blood from the main arteries and drive it into the terminal capillary vessels. But no such contraction took place in our Sav- iour's heart, it suddenly stopped in obedience to His will, the arrested blood stood still in every artery and vein ; and thus the spear when soon afterward thrust into His side, whether it entered the lungs or liver, would find the blood just beginning to separate in- to its component parts, the serum and coagulum. 64 OF CRUCIFIXION. John, if he could have had the knowl- edge of physiology we possess, would have written it: ''There came out the decom- posed blood ; that is, the thick, dark -red coagulum, and the colorless white serum;" and he mentions it to establish the fact of the strange and unusual nature of our Lord's departure; a parting from life entirely inconsistent, by any possibility^, with the worn-out and impoverished condition attend- ant upon slow starvation. He also refers to the passage contained in the thirty-fourth psalm ; one like many others serving both as a song of praise by its writer, and as a pro- phetic condensed biography of our Saviour : so also docs he quote from the twenty- second psalm and from the twelfth chapter of Zechariah which in like manner set forth the soul experiences of their writers as well as the prophecies concerning the anointed and suifering Messiah. That is, without doubt, a very strained interpretation which would make the words of 1 John v. 6, 8, 65 THE ROMAN METHOD ** water and blood," to mean the white serum and red fibrine that came from Jesus' body ; such symboHsm is inaccurate, inelegant and irreverent; serum is not water merely, but contains albumen and other elements of the blood; and the red fibrine is not blood, but only a portion of the blood. A much happier exegesis of that passage is that which sees in the water of baptism in which Jesus came, the cleansing and purifying influence He exerts upon the believer's heart ; which sees also in the blood in which Jesus came, the life He gave for us and by which, continually filling our souls with it. He saves us. The inquiry may now be resumed, that of the death of our Saviour so unexpected, when He had been but six hours on the cross. The theory of a broken heart does not well ex- plain all the circumstances. Heart rupture can occur only in company with, and as caused by, extreme mental distress or agony of soul, continued during an extended period of days ; there is no evidence in all the Gospel 66 OF CRUCIFIXION. records, of any such extreme trouble of mind in our Lord; in all cases of this disease in modem records, there has been, during some days prior to death, such wandering or rath- er eclipse of the intellectual powers as to put the patient in a kind of stupor, or render him partly incapable of mental exertion ; the cor- roding sorrow has forbidden thought and benumbed the faculties. But our Lord, dur- ing days and weeks prior to crucifixion, was of the same calm, even-minded, self-contained, rational deportment as during all former days of His ministry; in all His ways and words and works there appears no token of an unbalanced or even of an unquiet spirit, not excepting even the night in Gethsemane. In every scene through which during the last three days he so rapidly passed, and whether in an active or passive mood, His words and demeanor evince the high and calm control He had ever exercised over His own spirit and over the minds of all v^ho saw and heard Him; and during the six hours on the 67 THE ROMAN METHOD cross, His words to all around indicated a quiet repose of heart and self-possession, an utter absence of all distress ; He spake to the penitent thief the appropriate words of hope and pardon ; He gave His sorrowing mother into the care of the beloved disciple; there was capacity in His soul for the exercise of pure and gentle love, both divine and human, to the penitent thief by the forgiving God, to the mother by the dutiful and considerate son ; no one, suffering such dire extremity of distress as must end in a broken heart, could ever have demeaned himself so rationally and tranquilly up to and including the last moment of life. In fact, if such distress ex- isted, it is astonishing that the synoptists give no intimation anywhere in the story, that our Lord suffered any anguish of body or mind while on the cross ; and John, having those Gospels before him when writing his own thirty or forty years after theirs, and who would be certain to supply so important an omission, not only makes no mention of 68 OF CRUCIFIXION. pain or suffering, but even omits the one sad plaint offered up by our Lord to the God who had forsaken Him. Another hindrance to our trust in the theory of a broken heart, is in the fact that the last cry He gave forth, and which, in the view of the advocates of that theory is most relied on for its proof, was a cry with a loud voice; but the cry of extreme distress and anguish has no voice; however loud and piercing it may be, it is yet inarticulate ; the culminating agony is too bitter, too deep, too sudden at the instant the heart is torn open, to permit any form of expression more defined than a shrill, terrific shriek ; but the last cry of our Saviour was in clearly-spoken, intelligent words, '*It is finished, Father, into Thy hands I commit my spirit; " they indicate a mind unincumbered by any pressure of bodily or soul distress, and prove the possession of all natural faculties in their normal and un- troubled operation. We have seen that the victim was, by the 69 THE ROMAN METHOD Roman mode of crucifixion, put to very little actual bodily pain; he was suspended by ropes that allowed free circulation of blood, and would aiford him all the ease consistent with such a position; he was wounded by nails through hands and feet, but only because they were customary and actually nec- essary to secure him; if the hands and feet were suffered to rest quietly as attached, the little of blood that flowed from the wounds soon coagulated and stopped any further flow. We have also seen that the care of the executioners for a confinement that involved little suffering from suspensory or traumatic causes, was not prompted by a sentiment of mercy or kindness, but solely with the intent to insure the more extended and intense suffering attendant on the long-drawn agonies of starvation. When the appointed moment drew near, for the jaelding up of His spirit, it is reasonably certain that the strength and vigor of Jesus were in no sensible degree abated, and that His mind had been in no 70 OF CRUCIFIXION. wise affected by the six hours' duration of the punishment; ''the sun had not burned Him by day," for the cool darkness had shielded Him, and arrested any ill effects from thirst or fever ; we cannot, consistently with any fair inference, ascribe His death at the ninth hour to exhaustion produced by either mental or soul torture, nor to any bodily suf- fering resulting from the crucifixion. What, then, caused His early death, so unexpected to every one ? We are, by a broad considera- tion of every view of the case, shut up to the one answer, which is, that Jesus, in the ex- ercise of a right and power, both specially given Him, of His own will terminated His own life; He was the only being of human mould ever authorized and empowered to effect the separation of his own soul from his own body, and in John's Gospel, ch. x. vss. 17, 18, is to be found the clear statement of that fact. ''Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay down my life that I might take it again. No man taketh it from me, 71 THE ROMAN METHOD but I lay it down of myself. I have pow^er (efou9ta) to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This commandment received I from my Father." These are statements too strong and explicit to be construed in any other than their most direct, positive and literal meaning, and that meaning acquires great emphasis by the sets of double repeti- tions employed. ''I lay down my life, — no man taketh it from me." '' I lay it down of myself, — I have power to lay it down." ^'I take my life again, — I have power to take it again." *'I received this commandment (to lay down and to take again) from my Father." No declaration could express more clearly and distinctly the original and com- plete control by our dear Master over His own human life, nor can they possibly imply a mere passive, permissive, unresisting tolera- tion of the murderous designs of His enemies; they signify a deliberate act originating in His own will and executed on His own re- sponsibility ; every deed was done '*of him- 7a OP CRUCIFIXION. self; " He lay down His life when He chose, He took it again when He chose, and that choice was made in the right way, at the right time, and with a definite purpose in view. These words would have recalled what many of those then present had doubt- less heard Him say a little while before, '' I go my way, and ye shall seek me and shall die in your sins; whither I go ye cannot come." and then the query rose in their gross and sensual minds and came from their lips, "Will he kill himself? " because he saith, '* whither I go ye cannot come ? ' ' Thus with the former sayings coupled with these latter words, they thought they had from Him the abhorrent declaration, that He had been specially per- mitted by heaven to commit suicide and afterward to take His guilty soul back into His dishonored body ; this appeared to them so monstrous and fantastic that the only admissible explanation seemed to be, ''He hatha demon and is mad, why hear ye him? " That was the scomftil accusation and depre- 73 THE ROMAN METHOD cation on the one side, but the sufficient rebuttal of them came from the other side, ''But this demon was so good and powerful as to open the eyes of the blind ; surely, no insane words can come forth from the lips of one so accredited from Heaven; He is from God and must and does speak the truth, even if we do not altogether understand it." The final words that accompanied the death of Jesus are most significant. Although there are affirmations in abundance in all the New Testament that Christ was put to death by the Jews, and although Jesus himself had declared that the chief priests and scribes would conspire against and kill Him, yet His last words are as far as possible from sug- gesting such an effect as resulting from such a cause ; the words are not such as would be uttered by a human sufferer, calling on men to bear witness to his innocence and protest- ing against such a bitter and undeserved tak- ing of his life. Throughout all the pitiful scene there was no hint or suggestion offered 74 OF CRUCIFIXION. in expostulation against the disgrace of a criminal's death ; but all is submissive acqui- escence. Every statement, therefore, of the Acts, the Epistles and Gospels in which the enemies of Christ are named as the agents and actors in causing His death, is to be taken as implying and measuring their v^icked and murderous intent; at heart they were His murderers, and their every act was done to carry into effect the guilty purposes of their hearts. These last words of Jesus have thus no reference to pain of body, to regret over loss of His life, to the rancor and hate that have brought Him blameless to an un- timely end; but they are altogether as the words of one who consciously had supreme and kingly control over His own life, either to retain or to give it up. ''Into thy hands I commend, TrapaTidefiat, my spirit" (Luke). This is not an expression to come forth from the soul of one bitterly afflicted, laden with grief and going unwillingly out of life. Far from that, it indicates a rational and intelli- 75 THE ROMAN METHOD gent purpose, a deliberate act proceeding in a well-advised and chosen way ; under no pos- sible construction could they represent Jesus as going to His end in a passive or protesting attitude of mind; on the contrary, they re- veal an intent insistent and facile, a conclu- sion reached by well-ordered thought. Our blessed Lord, the Lord of both life and death, consciously and by the single operation of His own will, separated His own soul from His own body ; and for this He had received a special permission (''commandment ") from His Father. The time had come for that act. His work was finished, as He declared, and therefore it was needless for Him to remain on the cross any longer. His enemies had placed Him upon that cross for the one purpose of most cruel bodily torment; but such was not by any means His purpose nor that of His Heavenly Father in permitting Him to be put there. No mere suffering of the body, however slight, how- ever severe, had any place in the economy of 76 OF CRUCIFIXION. redemption ; no mortal torture, whether mild or excruciating, ever wrought for the least ef- fect in the reconcilicition of our souls through Jesus unto God. Serene and placid, our Sav- iour left His body, as if it were a garment He needed not for the present to wear ; He left it, not by constraint, nor for relief from suffer- ing, but for the purpose of demonstrating the possibility of reunion with that body glori- fied, and thus, after Him, of the reunion of all saints with their glorified bodies. The words also of the New Testament writers testify to the deliberation and calmness of this putting off: " He breathed forth, e^eirvev- aev (Mark and Luke). '' He gave forth, a(j)rjKev, the spirit " (Matt) . ''He delivered up, irapeS- (Ofcev, the spirit" (John). 77 IRetlecttons. If what is thus far written may be deemed valid, as founded upon legitimate reasoning, then there are certain conclusions naturally to be drawn. One is, that our Lord suffered comparatively little pain from His confine- ment to the cross ; the manner of fastening in Hiscase,as in the cases of all others, was such as to inflict the minimum of suffering consist- ent with the retention of the body on the cross ; but He was favored above all others ever crucified, in escaping the unshaded heat of the sun, with the mental disorder it would have caused. The pain and discomfort were the least He could undergo with that kind of punishment and for the short time He en- dured it. The very proceedings regularly followed for making this kind of execution, in all cases one of extremest cruelty, were those 78 OF CRUCIFIXION. actually conducive to the least suffering in His case. The physical pain He suffered most arose from the wounds in hands and feet, yet if He kept them quiet the blood clots that soon formed would exclude the air in great measure and thus secure nearly full cessation from pain. The terrors of crucifixion consist- ed in its duration, its hunger-pangs, its delir- ium, its slow drain upon the vital powers, its exhaustion, long drawn out, of blood and nerves and strength. Our Lord knew none of these; at the ninth hour. His bodily condi- tion, except as to His wounds, was as good as at the third hour ; and it was only at that last hour that the first of the symptoms due to crucifixion appeared, being announced in His own words, '' I thirst." He hung on that cross quietly during the six hours, not for the sake of any bodily pain, but for another more awful and grander purpose, awfal in its ter- rible experiences and inexpressibly grand in its results. In the growing tendencies of our time to 79 THE ROMAN METHOD multiply images of the cross and of the cruci- fixion, and to observe the anniversary of Jesus' death with religious ceremonies more or less elaborate, the liability is ever toward an increasing regard of His supposed physi- cal sufferings while on the cross, and toward attributing to these some efficient agency in the propitiation made for the sins of the whole world. We must turn our backs con- stantly and resolutely upon such a deadly error. Indeed, the events of Calvary have come to be viewed so generally through eyes of senti- ment or through feelings of sympathy for mere mortal anguish, vaguely assumed as having been endured by our Saviour, that attention has been drawn off from, and there is danger of an utter forgetting of, the fact that expiation and reconciliation were made on the cross through death (not annihila- tion) of the SOUL of Jesus, and not through any corporeal agony. There is reason for believing that our popular Protestant theol- 80 OF CRUCIFIXION. ogy, or rather our religious practice, has been deeply infected by that Roman Catholic spirit and practice in which the physical suf- ferings attributed to our Lord are assigned a prominent, if not the larger part in the work of expiation and redemption. The galleries of the Old World abound in paintings and statuary representing what the artists sup- posed to be true of the events of the crucfix- ion day. They have to do with all that could be imagined always of the painful, often of the horrible and revolting, and some- times of the grotesque; but all of them, in the light of what has here been written, are grossly untrue. Copies in colors, in print or photograph of these false but attractive w^orks of art have been distributed in count- less numbers throughout the Protestant peoples of both continents, and their influ- ence upon Christian thought and culture has been anything but good and wholesome. On this subject, nothing more appropriate could be said than the following by John Ruskin : THE ROMAN METHOD ** Therefore, of all subjects that can be ad- mitted to sight, the expressions of fear and ferocity are the most foul and detestable; and so there is in them I know not what sympathetic attractiveness, for minds cow- ardly and base, as the vulgar of most na- tions ; and as they are easily rendered by men who can render nothing else, they are often trusted by the herd of painters incapable and profane, as in that monstrous abortion of the first room of the Louvre, called the Deluge, whose subject is pure, acute, mortal fear; and so generally, in the senseless hor- rors of the modern French schools, spawm of the guillotine And manifold in- stances of the same feeling are to be found in the repainting of the various representations of the Inferno, so common through Italy ; so in the Inferno of Santa Maria Novella, and of the Arena chapel, not to speak of the horrible images of the Passion, by which vulgar Romanism has always striv- en to excite the languid sympathies of its un- 82 OF CRUCIFIXION. taught flocks. Of which foulnesses let us reason no further, the very image and mem- ory of them being pollution; only noticing this, that there has always been a morbid tendency in Romanism toward the contem- plation of bodily pain, owing to the attribu- tion of saving power to it ; which, like any other moral error, has been of fatal effect in art, leaving not altogether without the stain and blame of it even the highest of the Ro- manist painters, as Fra Angelico for instance, wrho, in his Passion subjects, always insists v^eakly on the bodily torture and is unspar- ing of blood; and Giotto, etc.," (Modern Painters, Part III, Sec. I, Chap.xiv., ^29). From such representations in art, therefore, there is much of evil to be apprehended through the defilement and debasement of our evangelical principles, and it is to be feared that this morbid sympathy for a suf- fering that never was endured by our Saviour may be productive of serious and wide-spread error among the masses in our Protestant churches. 83 THE ROMAN METHOD The cross did not mean for Jesus either the common death of men or any severe suffering, but only shame; and He endured it, despis- ing, not death nor suffering, but the shame of it. The moral and social status of the worst criminal ever attached to a cross could not have been, by law or custom, fixed lower than that assigned to our pure and innocent Master when Pilate delivered Him to the chief priests, and bid them do with Him as they desired. The rule declared by our Elder Brother, that ''he that humbleth himself shall be exalted " applies to Him also; for since He humbled Himself and became obedi- ent even to the death of the cross, therefore God highly exalted Him, to give Him a name that is above every name. Thus, by the cross of shame, of hate, contempt and ignominy, the lowest of all men may be brought close in fellowship to our Master's side, and may, as was the penitent thief, be assured of being some day with Him in Paradise. The death He suffered was death of the 84 OP CRUCIFIXION. SOUL, the awful second death ; and we must beHeve that in order to know how to redeem men from that, it was the death of a lost hu- man soul He experienced during the three hours of darkness on the cross ! Over such a death, how glorious the triumph, how un- speakably great the victory ! It was a small thing for Him to return after three days to the body in Joseph's tomb, but it was the Mighty God of the universe whose soul was brought up from that av^ful death which He tasted for every man. It was for this that God had ages ago given Him the assurance of both kinds of resurrection; the resurrection of His soul, that it should not be left in hell ; the resurrection of His body, that it should not see corruption. His soul, made sin for us, and under the wrath of, because forsaken by. His God, met and overcame all the pov^ers of hell, and thereby made sure our souls' vic- tory over the same death, the same hell. But the subject now opens very widely, and further discussion of it may properly be de- ferred. 85 DATE DUE jiiifc-rr*? 1 l«^-rP^» \^^^RB9B||l^ ft E ii|ijlfliirt>.ft- fees I&. CAYLORD rRINTEOINU.S.A.