' S. /5L.'o6" from f 0e feifirarg of (profeBBor ^amuef OXifPer in (glemorg of 3ubge ^amuef (gttffer QBrec&inrtbge $re0enfeb fit l&amuef (JttifFer QBtecftinribge feon^ fo f 0e feifirarg of (prtnceton £6eofogtcaf ^Semmarg tv & fafLe* fa*r"«-*' X^~- • ™"J#Z2&<£ & C A L V I N's C O M M E N T A R Y ON THE EPISTLE of JAMES: NEWLY TRANSLATED FROLt THE ORIGINAL LATIN. WITH NOTES, PRACTICAL, HISTORICAL, anj> CRITICAL. ABERDEEN: Printed ev J. Chalmers and Co. j Avd sold Bjr A. Bkown, Bookseller, BaoADSTREET, MDCCXCVII. zr:tWtC634&$&Q&@@§&£$tt090****acs,a TO THE PUBLIC. IN this fhort epiftle of James, you have a fpecimen of the labours of Calvin. His ftrength ofunderftanding, concife manner, and nervous ftyle, occafioned no fmall difficulty in tranllating this part of his Commentary into Englifh. The learned know, that difmfe fentiment is more eafily tranflated than the clofe, accurate, and fentimental. — Care has been taken to keep as near the original as poflible ; fo far, at leaft, as the Englifh language would permit. A more elegant and verbofe translation might have been given ; but the great objeft with the editors was, to give their author, and not themfelves : and they had no hefitation to facrifice their own fame to honefty and truth. If they have been miflaken in any part, let it be afcribed to inability, and not to defign. They will liflen with candour, to any improvements fuggefted, by others better qualified, for an undertaking of this nature, and receive them with gratitude. Calvin is one of thole writers who appear a little {tiff on the firft perufal : but has this fpecial recommendation— that he always improves upon his readers. Some authors pleafe for a moment, and are relifhed no more : but, the more frequently Calvin's Commentary is perufed, the fenfible reader becomes the fonder of it. He always reads to his improvement, and with the greater fatisfaclioa and profit. vS^j^^^^i^^S^rf 1 ^*^*^" PREFACE. FROM the writings cf Hieronymus and Eufebius we find, that this epiftle was not received by many of the aricient churches, without fome degree of conteft. [i] There are even fome, at this day, who hold it to be unworthy of divine au- thority. For my part, as I can fee no juft caufe of rejecting it, I do, therefore, embrace it without hesitation, and chearfully. For, altho' the doctrine of juftification by grace appears, in the fecond chapter, to be reverfed* •, we mall, however, eafily do away the force of that objection in' the proper place. Again, what tho' he appear more fparing in preaching the grace of Chrift than is confident with the character of an apoflle : 'tis not to be expected, that they all fhould handle one and the fame argument. The writings of Solomon differ much from thofeof David, both as to matter and ftyle. Solomon directs his view, chiefly, to form the external man, and to deliver to us the pre- cepts of political life : David conftantly choofcsthe fpiritual wor- fliip of God, peace of conference, or the gracious pvomife of fal- vation, for his theme. This difference, however, is no reafon, why, in approving. the one, we fhould condemn the oilier. Even among the evangelifts themfelves, there is fuch a difference in difplaying the glory of Chrift, that the other three, compared with John, feem hardly to poffefs the fparks of that brightnei's which appears fo confpicuous in him : Mill, however, we pay an equal regard to them all. Whei-efore, to me it appears a fufficient reafon for receiving this epiftle as authentic, that it contains nothing unworthy' of an apoftle of Chrift ; but, on B the * Paul sfierting " that we are juftifkd by grace — and by faith" — whereas the words of James are, " Ye fee then, how that by \yorks a man is juftified, atid " not by faith only," the contrary, abounds in doctrines, the utility of which extends to every part of the chriftian life. Here we find eminent max- ims concerning patience, prayer, the excellence of heavenly doctrine, humility, the exercifes of the faints, the command of the tongue, the obfervance of peace, the government of the paflions, contempt of a prefent life, and many fimilar fubjects, each of which we {hall difcufs in its proper place. But with regard to the author of this epiftle there is greater reafon of doubt. One thing is certain, that it was not James, the fon of Zebedee •, for he was put to death by Herod foon after the re- furrection of our Lord. The ancient fathers, in general, agree, that it was one of the difciples, whofe firname was Oblias, a kinfman of Chrift, who prefided over the church of Jerufalem ; ixnd they are of opinion, that it is the fame James whom Paul mentions, together with Peter and John, in the ii. chapter of the epiftle to the Galatians ; and of whom he fays, " that they 4( feemed to be pillars." But, to me, it appears not at all pro- bable, that one of the difciples fhould be reckoned among the three pillars, and thus exalted above the other ten apoftles. I, therefore, rather incline to go into this opinion, that he of whom Paul there fpeaks, was James the fon of Alpheus. At the fame time, however, I do not deny that there was another, the over- feer of the church of Jerufalem, and one too of the number of the difciples. [2] For the apoftles were not to be bound down • to one place. [3] But which of the two was the writer of this epiftle I will not take upon me to determine. That he, who was firnamed Oblias, was a perfon of great authority among thr Jews, is evident from this ; that after he had been cruelly put to death by the faction of a wicked high prieft, Jofephus, without hefitation, afcribes the deftruction of the city, as owing, in * great rneafure, to his death. NOTES ON THE PREFACE, [1] Eufebius, one of the moft judicious and faithful of the rodent hiftorians, divides the books which claim a divine in- fpiration, into three claffes. I ft, Thofe which were univerfally received by the whole church. 2dly, Such as were received by a majority, but rejected by fome : and 3dly, The fpurious pro- ductions. AmoYc thofe books which were received as divine by C v ] by a majority, but rejected by fome, are the epiftles of James and Jude; the fecond and third of John; and the fecond of Peter. The epiftle of James, however, was received into the facred canon very early, as is evident from its being tranflated into Syriac, at the fame time, with the firft epiftles of Peter and of John. The evidence, that thefe three epiftles were written by apoftles, no doubt, was the reafon why they were fo early adopted as canonical. The extreme caution wherewith this epiftle was received, (hews us the great care of the primitive church to be thoroughly fatisfied, that what they admitted as facred fcripture was af- furedly written by men divinely infpired. The credulous eafily admit what they wifh to be true. Aware of this propenfity, like men of integrity, the firft chriftians examined again and again, and permitted nothing to be received on general evidence. Hence the reafon why the general epiftles were laft of all taken into the facred canon. Paul's letters or epiftles were all inferib- ed to particular churches or perfons ; and it was eafy to afcer- tain whether fuch letters exiftcd, being in the poiTeflion of thofe to whom they were tranfmitted ; and copies of the oiiginals carefully preferved : whereas the epiftle of James being addrefTed to chriftians at large, a confiderable time muft have elapfed be- fore it could be afcertained in what particular place the original was lodged, and the evidence of its authenticity collected. The receiving of it, fo univerfally, after fuch a tedious, accurate, and fcrupulous examination, is a ftrong proof that the primitive church was fully convinced of its being genuine. NOTE II. [2] The opinion, that there were three of the name of James, Ion j prevailed with many. James the Great ; James the Lefs ; and James the Juft. Dr Cave fays this opinion is built on a fandy foundation. The fcriptures evidently refer to two only of this name. James the Great, the fon of Zebedee, fo called on ac- count of his age. This James was put to death by Herod in the 44th year of our Lord. James the Lefs, called alfo James the Juft, and the fame whom Calvin alludes to by the name of Oblias, was the author of this epiftle. He lived about eighteen years later than the other James, and wrote his epiftle a little before the deftru£tion of Jerufalem. He is fuppofed to have been the fon of Alpheus, by a relation of the Virgin Mary, a niece of Zacharias, John the Baptift's father. His mother, who was B 2 alio C vi ] . alio called Mary, after the death of her firft hufband, becaius wife to Jofeph the Carpenter, before his efpoufals to the Virgin-, and James, though called the fon of Alpheus, remotely, after the manner of the Jews, was, probably, the real fon of Jofeph, and one of thofe four fons whom he raifed up to his deceafed kinfman. This opinion is belt fupported by the words of fcrip- ture$ Matth. xii-i. 55. where the infpired writer lends us to be- lieve, that James was the fon of Jofeph, in the fame literal and natural fenfe, in which we are to underfttmd Mary to have been the mother of Chrift. His rending in Jofeph's hnufe along with Jofes, Simon, and Jude, and making one of the family, ftrongly fupports this opinion. NOTE III. [3] In the primitive church there were apoftles, ciders, and brethren It was the peculiar office of an apoftle, ift, To teftify of the refurre&ion of Chrift. For this purpofe, it behoved him to have feen the Lord, either in the flem, as in the cafe of the eleven apoftles ; or in vifion, as in Paul's cafe, who appears to have had no perfonal acquaintance of the Mefliah, when he dwelt on earth. 2d, To confer the gifts of the Holy Ghoft by the impofition of hands. That this power was peculiar to the apoftles, is evident from the cafe of the Samaritans ; for though on Philip's preaching and their believing, he baptized them, yet he could not confer on them the Holy Ghoft. Luke exprefsly affirms, that the Holy Ghoft had not fallen upon any of them, till, the apoftles. at Jerufalem hearing of Philip's fuccefs, fent dewn Peter and John into Samaria; and that after they had prayed and laid their hands on thefe new converts, immediately they received the Holy Ghoft. To this power, our Saviour al- ludes in the xxiv. of Luke, and 29th verie, emphatically called power from on high. It is the fame word by which David, in the ex. pfalm, 2d verfe, had foretold the gifts of the Holy Spirit. We tranflate it the " Rod of ChriJTsJrength ;" but it was better rendered, in the old translation, " the rod of his power." This power of conferring the gift of the fpirit, is what Paul parti- cularly mentions,, as the moft diftinguifhing proof of his apoftle- fliip, 1 Cor. ix. 2. Of all the other gifts of the Holy Ghoft, this was. the leaft liable to fufpicion, and impoffible to be coun- terfeited. 3d, The apoftles, for the moft part, were not ftati- onary in the exercife of their ofhee ; but frequently travelled •from place to place, planting and confirming the churches, and can- C vii J confening the gift of the Holy Ghoft: whereas the difciples were more confined in the functions of their office ; though not al- ways rcitri£ted to one place. The elders, or difciples, were next in rank to the apoftles : they were fuch as had accompanied with Chriit from the be- ginning of his miniftry, heard his doctrine, faw his miracles, converfed with him, after he rofe from the dead ; and on whom the Holy (5hoftfcll atPentecoft, without the laying on of hands. Among the Jews, there were the elders of the people, and the elders of the city, men of age and experience. In analogy to this, it is probable, that thole chriftians who had been the oldeft difciples of Chriit, and hereby had the advantages of being well acquainted with his doctrine, miracles, and hiftory, were {tiled elders in the church, and frequently officiated as public teachers. Such were the elders Paul commanded Titus to or- dain at Crete. The lirft miniftersof the gofpel, and the deacons of the church were chofen from among them. Theii labours, however, were much more limited than the labours of the apoftles, nor were they of equal authority in the church. True, indeed, the eleven apoftles and Matthias were eMers *, though there were elders who were not apoftles. Peter exprefsly calls himfelf an elder in his lirft epiftle, chap. v. and fo does John. Yet it is remarkable of Paul, that he never ftiles himfelf an elder ; even when giving himfelf the greateft weight, he only calls himfelf Paul the Aged. Paul was not of the hundred and ity en whom the Holy Ghoft fell at Pentecoft, nor had he accompanied with Chriit as they had done; therefore, itriclly fpeaking, was net an elder, but an apoitle born out of due feafon. i CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE OF JAMES. CHAP. I. JAMES, [i] a fervant of God, and of the Lord Jefus Chrift, to the twelve tribes which are fcattered abroad, greeting. To the twelve tribes.'] When the ten tribes were carried a- way into captivity, the king of Afiyria fettled them in different parts of his dominions. [2] — Afterwards, as ufually happens in the revolutions of kingdoms, which, in ancient times, were frequent, it is probable, that they were often feparated, and removed from one place to a- nother. — The Jews, indeed, had been fcattered up and down in almoft all the regions of the world. Thofe of them, there- fore, whom he could not ad- drefs by fpeech and face to face, becaufe they were far and wide- ly difperfed, he now exhorts by letter. And the reafon why he treats not on the fubjecl: o£ the grace of Chrift, and faith in him, appears to be this; that he was addreffing himfelf to thofe who had been already properly eftablifhed in the firft principles by others ; fo that information on points of doctrine was not fo necefiary to them, as ani- mated exhortations to practice. 2. My brethren, count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations. 2. Count it all joy, .] The firft exhortation is, that they fhould meet, with joy, the temptati- ons by which their faith is tried. At that time, it was a pri- mary and eflentially neceffary ob- 13 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE object, that the Jews, almoft overwhelmed svith calamities, fhould be fupported and corn- foiled. For fo infamous was the name of the nation, that they were hated and contem- ned by all people, whitherfo- cver they came. — And dill more miierable was the condi- tion of the chriftians, who had the Gentiles of their own kind- red for their bittereft foes. : — This exhortation, however, is not fo peculiarly appropriated to any one particular period, but that it may be ufeful to the faithful in every other j for their life is a conftant warfare while on earth. But, in order the better to comprehend its meaning, we obferve, that by the word, temptations, we are, undoubtedly, to underftand ad- verfity, or the hardfhips and afRkdons of life, for thefe are trials of our obedience towards God. He enjoins the faithful, then, " to count it all joy," when they are exercifed with calamities : and not only when they fall into one temptation, but into more ; not only, when they are of one kind, but when they are manifold and various. And furely, forafmuch as thefe trials have a tendency to mor- tify the flefh, the vices of which are continually fpringing up in us ■■, fo, for that reafon, it is neceffary that they mould be frequently repeated. Nor is it to be wondered at, that as our difeafes are various, fo the re* medies applied for their cure fhmild alfo be various : and hence, becaufe the vices of am- bition, of avarice, of envy, of gluttony, of the immoderate love of this world, and the innumerable other lufts with which we abound, cannot be cured by one and the fame me- dicine, the Lord vifits us with manifold and various afflictions. When he requires them " to " count it all joy, Sec." it is, as if he had faid, that fuch temptations were fo far to be accounted profitable, as to be really the fubjecl matter of re- joicing : in fine, it fignifies that there is nothing in afflictions which ought to difturb our joy. And thus he not only enjoins to bear adverfity with quietnefs and equanimity , but teaches that there is reafon why the faithful fhould rejoice, even when hard prcfied by calamities. There is no doubt, but the conftituti- on of our nature is fuch, that any trial or affliction will affect, us with pain and forrow ; nor can any of us fo far diveft our- felves of our natural feelings, as when v/e fenfibly experience evil, not to grieve m\d be fad. But this is no reafon why the children of God, under the direction of the Spirit, may not rife above all the pains of the flefh : and hence it is, that even in the midft of forrow, they need not ceafe to rejoice. 3. Know- EPISTLE OF JAMES; Jti 3. Knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience. 3. Knowing this, tec. ~\ Hence we fee why he calls adverfe circumftances in life, or afflic- tions, temptations ; namely be- caufe they ferve for the trying of our faith : this caufe is here affigned for the confirmation of the foregoing fentence. For it might be objected ; how is it poffible we mould account that joyous or pleafant, which to our natural fenfes is grievous and bitter ? In anfwer to this, he fhews that 'tis on account of the effect of afflictions, we ought to rejoice in them, be- caufe they produce patience, which is a fruit of high price. Since God, then, by thefe, provides for our future welfare and falvation, he certainly fur- nifhes us with jufl ground of rejoicing. Peter ufes the fame argument near the beginning of his firft epiftle, chap. i.<5. 7. " Though now for a feafon, if " need be, ye are in heavincfs " thro' manifold temptations ; " that the trial of your faith " being much more precious " than of gold that perifheth, " tho' it be tried with fire, M might be found unto praife, <( and honour and glorv, at the " appearing of Jefus Chrift." Certainly, it is on this account that we dread difeafcs, pover- ty, banifhment, imprisonment, difgrace and death, becaufe we account them to be evils : but when we come to underftand, that by the goodnefs of God they are converted into the means of our falvation, it would be ungrateful in us to repine when vifited with them ; or ra- ther, not voluntarily to prefent ourfelves as the fubjects of fuch fatherly treatment. Paul, in his v. chapter to the Romans, and 3d verfe, fays, " we glo- ry" on account of that, which James here bids us rejoice in : " we glory in tribulation afk a beginning. When he en- joins us to afk of the Lord, he C 2 points. CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE points out to us, that 'tis he alone, who is able to heal our difeafes and fuccour our necef- fities. Who giveth to all liberally; he means to all who afk •, for thofe who do not feek a remedy for their wants deferve to perifh in them. The general form of his addrefs has great weight in it ; by which he invites each and all of us without excepti- on; and, therefore, no one fhould deprive himfelf of fo great a bleffing. To this a pro- inife is immediately annexed. For, as by this command he points out what the nature of every one's duty is •, fo he af- firms, that if they do what he commands, they fhall not la- bour in vain; agreeable to what our Saviour fays, " knock, and it fhall be opened:" and the word liberally denotes his rea- dinefs to give. Thus, Paul, in the xii. chap, to the Romans, ver. 8. requires from the dea- cons liberality: " he that giveth, « let him do it with fimplicity, *< or, liberally ; and in the viii. and ix. chapters of his fecond cpiftlc to the Corinthians, treat- 6. But let him afk in faith, [3] nothing wavering: for he that wavereth is like a wave of the fea, driven with the wind and tolled. ing of alms, he frequently re- peats the fame words. The fenfe then is, that God is fo readily inclined to give, that he neither reje&s nor contu- melioufly puts off any one: not like fome penurious clofe-fifted mortals, who beftow but little, and with an ill will, and, as it were a half fhut hand ; or who retrench from what they were about to give, or debate long with themfelves, whether they fhall give it or not. And up- braideth not. He adds this, that no one may be afraid to ap- proach God frequently; The moft liberal of men, if repeat- edly folicited for affiftance, will remind us of their former bene- factions, and fo excufe them- felves for the future ; hence we are afhamed to importune any man, however liberal, with too frequent requefts. But James puts us in mind, that there is no difpofition in the divine Being to upbraid — that he is always ready to add new bene- fits to the former, and to give without meafure or end. 6. But let him ajk in faith.'] Firlt he teaches the right way of afking : for as we cannot open the mouth in prayer, but through the medium of words, fo, before we open our mouth in prayer, we ought to believe. By prayer we teftify that we expect from God the grace which he has promifed ; but if any EPISTLE OF JAMES. x 5 any one has not faith in his promifes, he prays as a hypo- crite. Hence, alfo, we learn what true faith is : as foon as James hath directed us to afk in faith, he adds this explanation %t nothing wavering." Faith, then, is that principle, which, relying on the promifes of God, gives us the aflurance of what we afk ; whence it follows, that it is conjoined with a con- fidence in, and certainty of the divine love towards us. The word ufed, in the original, pro- perly fignifies to enquire, or, after the manner of difputants, to fearch diligently on both fides. He would, then, have us to be fo fully perfuaded in our own minds of the certainty of what God hath prornifed, as by no means to entertain doubt, whether we (hall be heard or not. For he that wavereth. By this figure of fpeech, he ele- gantly points out the manner in which God punifhes the in- fidelity of thofe who doubt con- cerning his promifes. They in- wardly torture themfelves by their own inquietude ; for no where can they have peace or reft to their fouls, but while they rely on the truth of God. At length he concludes, that they who waver are unworthy to obtain any favour from God. This paffage is remarkably well calculated to refute that popifh doctrine, which, thro' the whole of their church, is held facred as an oracle j namely, that wV are to pray doubtingly, and, with an uncertain belief of fuc- cefs. But let us hold this prin- ciple, that our prayers are not heard by God, unlefs we pray in the full confidence of obtain- ing what we afk: 'tis impoffible, indeed, but that, in this infir- mity of the flefh, we mufl be harrafTed by various temptati- ons, which are as engines to fhakc our faith. Nor will any one be found, who, in his car- nal man, would not totter and tremble under them : but fuch temptations muft at length be overcome by faith : as the tree, which hath itruck its roots deep and firm in the earth, is fhaken indeed by the violence of die wind, yet is not torn up, but continues fixed and firm in its place. 7. For let not that man think that he fhall receive any thing of the Lord. 8. A double minded man is unflable in all his ways. 8. A double minded man.~\ — This fentence inay be confider- ed in a feparate fenfe, and as fpoken of hypocrites, in general: I am rather, however, inclined to confider it as the conclu- fion i6 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE fion of the foregoing doctrine. Thus, there will be a tacit an- tithefis between the open, rea- dy, and conftant beneficence of the Deity, and the contra6ted and unliable difpofition of man. For, as God bellows his gifts on us liberally and with an open hand ; fo, on our part, it be- comes us to receive them with a grateful and open heart. He fay?, then, that the unbeliev- ing, whofe paths are crooked, are unliable, becaufe they keep not in view one and the fame object ; but are at one time elated with confidence in the fleth, at another are funk in the depths of defpair. 9. Let the brother of low degree rejoice in that hi exalted : . , is o. Let the brother of _ low de- gree rejoice.'] As Paul, when he exhorts fervants to bear their lot with patience, propofes to them this confolation, that they were God's freemen, liberated by his grace from the miferable fervitude of fatan ; and admo- nilhes the free born to remem- ber that they were the fervants of God : fo our author, in the fame fenfe, enjoins thofe of low degree to glory in this, that they were adopted into the number of the fons of God j and the rich to rejoice, that from an effectual conviction of the vanity of this world, they had been brought to a regular and orderly deportment. He defires the former to be content with their humble and low con- dition, and forbids the latter to be high minded ; reminding them, that this is our higheft and incomparable dignity, that we are admitted into the fociety of angels, yea, made joint heirs with Chrill. Thofe who fet a proper value on this great kind- nefs of God, will lightly efteera all other things. Therefore, neither poverty, nor contempt, nor nakednefs, nor hunger, nor third, (hall fo diltra& their minds, but they may fupport themfelves with this confola- tion — fince the Lord hath be- llowed on me the chief good, it becomes me to bear the want of inferior bleflings with refig- nation and a patient mind. In this fenfe it is that " the bro- " ther of low degree, ought to " rejoice in that he is exalted :" becaufe, if he is acceptable to God — in his adoption alone, he hath fufficiently abundant ground of confolation, and need net grieve beyond meafure in an inferior or adverfe condition of life. 1: But EPISTLE OF JAMES. »7 10. But the rich, in that he is made low: becaufe as the flower of the grafs he fhall pafs away. I o . But the rich, in that he is maa'e /ow.~\ He has put the fpecles here for the genus*. — For this exhortation hath a re- fpe£l to all who are exalted either in honour, or by nobili- ty, or other external circum- ftances. He enjoins them to " glory in their being made ** low," or in their meannefs, that he may check the proud and high minded, who are wont to be too much elated in profperity. Moreover he de- fines it a ft being made low," becaufe the kingdom of God revealed ought to lead us to a contempt of the world ; that we may know, that all things, which we held in high eftima- tion before, are lefs than noth- ing and vanity. For Chrill, who hath declared himfelf, in an efpecial manner, the guide of little children, efFectually crufiies all carnal pride by his dodlrine. Therefore, left the rich fhould be carried away by the vain joy of the world, let them accuftom themfeives to glory in the deftruction of their carnal excellence. Becaufe, as a flower of the grafs, he Jhall pafs away, j If any be of opinion, that James here alludes to the words of Ifaiah, (xl. 6.) 1 do not oppofe them, but I will not grant that he cites the words of the prophet as any tevtimony in confirmation of his doctrine; for Ifaiah fpeaks not of the good things of fortune and the fleet- ing fafhion of the world alone ; but of the whole man, the foulf as well as the body ; whereas James treats only con- cerning the pomp of wealth or worldly good things- — The fum is, that glorying in riches, which make to themfeives wings and fly away, is foolifh and prepoflerous. — Philofophers teach the fame doctrine ; but it is like telling a ftory to a deaf man, until the Lord open the ear to understand the everlaft- ing duration of the heavenly kingdom. Therefore, he ufes the word brother in the 9th ver. meaning that we are not pre- pared for this doctrine, until we have been adopted into the num- * Genus is a logical term which comprehends under it many Species. Thus the Word animal denotes a genus which comprehends under it many fpecies, or different clafTes of living creatures. But richts, which include in them one fpecies of gieat- refs, are here put by James for worldly honours, nobility and every other cir- cumfhnce which exalt and dignify. f What Ifaiah and Calvin both teach is — the vanity of all men in themfeives, not only in refpett of the body, or any thing that adorns it ; but alfo in refpect of the endowments of the mind, as wifdom, courage, and eloquence ; lor man in the mkifl of all thsfc is fading like the grafs and nailttu away. i8 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE to be read *o g ut~{. without the diphthong, i. e. he mall pafs away in his wealth, or with his wealth. number of the children of God. Altho' the reading hraic *<>?«« , . happy in his own judgement. Derek, the Hebrew word which Is tendered by th.s frequently refers to an opinion of the mind, the way in which the nrnnd operate. 3ES i f «If. In his wealth-oraelual poffeflions. Thus, whatever he may think « wha ever he may enjoy of this world, death foon fweeps htm away. EPISTLE OF JAMES. 10 thofe is vain, who infer from this, that the crown is merited by the conteft. For as God has, of his g r ace, appointed it for us, the enduring of temptations only jits us to receive it. — As to what he adds, " that it ispro- " mifed to thofe who love ** God;" by fo exprefTmghim- felf, he does not afTert that the love of man is the caufe ; for we love God, bccaufe he nrft loved us — he only means, that thofe alone approve themfelves the eleft of God, who love him; while at the fame time he puts us in mind, that thcfe who love God (hall conquer all tempta- tions; and that it is only on this account, bccaufe the love of the world prevails, that we faint in, our minds when we are tempted. 13. Let no man fay when he is tempted, lam tempted of God : for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man. 13. Let no man fay when he is tempted, <&Y.] Here, it is plain, he begins to treat of tempta- tions of a different kind. 'Tis well known that thofe outward temptations, of which only, he has hitherto made men- tion, come immediately from the hand of God. In this fenfe God tempted Abraham, and daily tempts us ; that is, he makes trial of the qualities of our hearts, by furnifhing us with an opportunity of difclof- ing them. But to draw forth to \ r iew the fecrets of the heart, and to flir up in it perverfe and wicked pailions, are very different things. Here, then, he treats of internal tempta'd- ens, or of thofe inordinate ap- petites which incite us to tranf- greflion : and, with- great juf- tice, denies God to be the author of thefe ; for they flow from- onv own carnal corrup- tion. This is ?. very neceiTary admonition ; for nothing is more common among mankind, than to transfer to others the blame of the evils which they themfelves have done ; and ef- pecially they think themfelves then moft free from blame, if they can turn it upon God — - This muffling artifice, handed down to us from the firft man, we are too careful to imitate : for this reafon, James calls upon each of us to confefs his own guilt, and not to lay the charge upon God, as if he tempted us to fin. But many paffages of fcripture feem to oppofe the fentiment in this verfe, which inform us, that mankind are " given over to " blindnefs of mind by God, " and to a reprobate mind, and *' to vile and unlawful affec- " lions." I anfwer, that, 'tis probable, James was induced,- D on a* CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE on this very account, to aflcrt that we are not tempted of Cod, becaufe the wicked, for a pretext, arm themfelves with the teftimony of fcripture. — But there are two things to he obferved here. — When the fcriptures afcribe blinding the mind or hardening the heart to God, they neither impute the commencement of thefe to him, nor make him the author of evil, fo as that he fhould be in any fenfe liable to blame. And on thefe two alone James in- fills. — The fcripture afferts that the reprobate are given up by Cod to vile affections. Is it becaufe God depraves or corrupts their hearts ? By no means : for they* are fub- jected to perverfe lull, becaufe they were already vicious and corrupt. But when God blinds • and hardens; is he the author or mmifter of (in ? Yea, in this way he punifhes fins, and repays to the wicked, who have refufed to be guided by hi* holy Spirit, their deferved re- ward. It follows, therefore* that the origin of fin, or the guilt of it, cannot be imputed to God, as if he took pleafure in evil. The conclufion is, that they are idle triflers, who en- deavour to lay the blame of their vices upon God ; for all evil, of whatever nature, fprings from no other fountain but the perverfe luft of man. — And thus it is evident that every one's own wicked paffions are his inftigators to fin, and guide him in the commiffion of wic- kednefs. And he proves that Gcd tempteth no man from this, that God is not tempted with evil. For 'tis on this ac- count that the devil entices to fin, becaufe he is wholly inflam- ed with a furious defire of fin- ning. But God defireth not evil ; neither can he be the promoter of wicked condudt in us. 14. Bat every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own luft, and enticed. 14. When he is dravjn aivo.y of his own !uj}, &c.~\ Since evil arifes from the internal work- ings and fuggeltions of our own hearts, 'tis* in vain for the iir.ner to faeka pretext or excufe from anv external influence : however, thefe two effects of luft are to be obfei^ved, that it enfnares us by its enticement, and leads us captive by irs power ; each of which is fuf- ficient to conftitute guilt. 15. Then, when lull hath conceived, it bringeth forth fin : and fin, when it is finifhed, bringeth forth death. jc. When EPISTLE OF JAMES. 21 15. When luft hath conceived, & ! c] 'Tis not any one parti- cular appetite, but the fource of all our concupifcible facul- ties, which he here calls luft:. By that a vicious brood are con- ceived, which, in time, make their appearance openly as fins. It would appear, however, that the word fin is, improperly, reftricled to external works, and not at all according to fcrip- ture-ufe ; as if luft itfelf were not a fin ; as if the wicked de- fires which continue fhut up and fupprefied within us, were not all of them fo many fins. But us the ufe of the word is vari- ous, there is nothing abfurd in it, tho' it be here uied for ac- tual tranfgveffion, as it is in many other places. The pa- pifts, however, ignorantly ufe this as an argument, when they want to prove, ' that vicious, vca, vile, wicked, and even heinous defires are not fins, if confent be not given [4] to them. For James is not dis- puting,. *' when fin begins to " have its birth, fo as to be " fin, and to be fo accounted " before Cod ; but when it " openly appears." Thus he gradually proceeds, that the finifhing of fin is the caufe of eternal death — that fin arifes out of our unlawful defires, and that thefe unlawful defires ■ their root in luft : whence it follows, that mankind, in their eternal death, only reap that fruit which they them- felves have fown. By " fin when " it is finiflied," I do not then underftand any one wicked work done, but afinifhedcourfe of finning. For altho' every fin deferve death j it is, how- ever, faid to be the wages of an, impious and wicked life. Hence the foolifh notion of thofe i-j refuted who argue, from thefe words, that fin is not mortal until it break out, as they phrafe it, in the exterior aci ; that is, till it appear openly in deeds. But neither is that the fubject which James treats of; he is only endeavouring to in- ftrucl: us in this, namely, l that the fource of our death or ruin originates in ourfelves,' 1 6. Do not err, my beloved brethren. 17. Every good gift, and every perfect gift, is from above, and cometh down from the Father of lights, with whom is no variablenefs, neither fhadow of turning. 18. Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth, that we fhould be a kind of firft fruits of his c-reatures. D 2 if. 2)9 22 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE \6. Do not err, dour of the fun. 18. Of his own wUl begat be Every one of the faithful has, us, &c.j He now brings lor- in fome degree, the experience ward a particular inltance of of this inellimable bleffing. — .that divine gocdnejfs which he .has proclaimed and commend- ed ; namely, that he hath re- generated us unto eternal life. The goodnefs of God then, experimentally known by all, ought to defrroy any contrary, opinion*. When he fays that ( God * The goodmfs of God is univtifal or particular. Regcneiation is an inflancc of fm particular goodnefs, and is experimentally known only liy the" faithful. — But as the general goodnefs of God is daily exueifed towards all, every one, fioia pis awn experience, may be fenfitk && God is good. EPISTLE OF JAMES. 2 "J God " of his own will begat *! us," he means that lie was induced to it by no caufe •, as the will and counfel of God are often oppofed to the merits of man. For what great matter would it be, if he only meant that God was not compelled to it ? He exprefTes Something more ; that God hath begoUcn us of his mere good pleafure, and thus was hirnfelf the caufe of it : whence it follows, that to do good is natural to God. The paflage farther teaches us, as our election was of grace, before the world was made, So, that our calling may corres- pond to our election, we are enlightened in the knowledge of truth merely by the grace of God : the fcripture teaches us that we were freely adopted by God before we were born- — Ephefians i. chap. 4th and 5th ver. " According as he hath " chofen us in him before the " foundation of the v/orld, " that we fhould be holy, and c.~\ A doer of the word does not mean here, as it does in the ii. chap, to the Romans, ver. 13. one who fatisnes the law of God, and fulfils it in every part ; but one who em- braces the law of God from his heart, and teftifies by his life, that he hath ferioufly believed it ; according to that faying of Chrift, « Bleffed are they that *' hear the word of God, and " keep it." For here he de- clares, from its fruits, what 23 . He is like unto a man, fo'c.~] The celeftial doctrine is indeed the mirror in which God pre- ients himfelf to. be feen by us ; but fo that we mould be chang- ed into his image, as Paul ob- ferves, 2 Cor. iii. 18. " But we ts all with open face beholding, " as in a glafs, the glory of " the Lord, are changed into " the fame image, from glory . " to glory, even as by the " Spirit of the Lord." But kind of an ingrafting that is which he has before mentioned. 'Tis moreover to be obferved, that faith is comprehended bv James, along with other works, and that too among the firfl — for it is the principal work that God requireth of us*. The force of his argument then is this, that we ought to give all diligence, that the word of Gcd may be rooted in us, fo that afterwards it may brine- forth fruit. here, James is fpeaking of the external caft of the eye, not of that lively efficacious contem- plation which penetrates into the heart. An elegant figure, by which he briefly points out, that that doctrine profitcth no- thing, which is received by trie hearing only, and not with die internal affection of the heart ; becaufc it immediately paffeth away. 25. But tvhofo looheth into the word, he now comes to tliat perfect law, ns according to worldly dillkiUons and cucumlbr.ces." EPISTLE OF JAMES. 4i 5. Hearhen, my beloved bre- thren, " them." Deut. xxvii. 26. In fine, we fee that a tranf. >-eiTor of the lav/, and one " who is " guilty of all,?' with James mean one and the fume thing. 1 2. So fpeak ye, and fo -do, as they that fhall be judg- ed by the law of liberty. 13. For he fhall have judgment without mercy, that hath (hewed no mercy j and mercy rejoiceth againit judgment, G a 12. So 46 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE 12. Sofpeakye, &V.] Some thus explain the verfe, that bc- cauie they were too partial to thetnfelves, they are put in in hid that they are to be tried at a legal tribunal. For men acquit themfdves in their own opinion, becaufe they do not try themfelves-by the fentence of the divine law. He has in view then, to put them in mind that all words and actions will be brought to this teft, for God will judge the world according to his law. But as fuch a de- nunciation might ftrike.a more than ordinary terror, they think the feverity to be amended and mitigated by the words added, " the law of liberty." For we hear what Paul faith : " As " many as are of the woi - ks " of the law, are under the " curfe." — Wherefore, the .judgment of the law in itfelf will be (to them) the condem- nation of eternal death. This fenfe of the veife correfponds 1 3 . For he Jlmll have judgment, cv.] This is the application of the laft fentence to his pre- sent purpofe, which entirely confirms the fecond expofition which I have given of it. For it teaches us, that as we de- pend on the mercy of God a- •joue, we ought to ihew mercy to thofe whom God himfelf re- commends to us. And this is a remarkable recommendation of humanity and beneficence, well enough with the context. However, if any one confider more nearly what immediately follows, he will fee that James has fomcthing elfe in view ; as if he had thus exprefTed him- felf : tf If you ycurfelves would not wifh to undergo the rigour of the law, be not too rigid againft your neighbours." For the law of liberty is of the fame import with the mercy of God, which frees us from the curfe of the law. — And thus the words will be to be read in context with the following, where he fpeaks of bearing with the infirmities of others. Then the context runs fmoothly thus: ." Since none of us can hand before Goc!, unlefs delivered from the rigfcr of the law, we ought fo to behave that we.may not, by our too great feverity, (towards others) exclude our- felves from the Divine favour and indulgence, of which ail have the utmoft need." that God promifes he will be merciful to us, if we be merci- ful to our brethren: not that any mercy of ours, of what kind foever it be, that we can (hew, to our fellow creatures, merits the mercy of God : but whom God hath chofen, that he may be to thefe a compaf- fionate and merciful father — thefe he willies to carry about and bear in themfelves his own; image while on earth : accord- EPISTLE OF JAMES. 4J ing to that commandment of Citrift ; " Be merciful, as your " heavenly father is merciful." 'Tis to be obferved, on the other hand, that, Y.] He proceeds in commendation of mercy. As he had threaten- ed that God would be to us a fevere and terrible judge, un- it fa we be humane and com- panionate to our neighbours : and as on the other hand hypo- crites objected — that faith, in which the falvation of man con- fills, is fufficknt for us, he now inveighs againft that vain boaft- 48 CALVIN'S COMMENTARY ON THE bcafling. The fum of his rea- foning is — that faith without Works profiteth nothing, and conf.quently is dead. — But here aqueflion arifes — can faith be feparated from charity? The expofition of this pafTage gave Occaficn to that trite diltin£tion among the fophiits — into fcaith informed and formed. L4J But James had no fuch thing in view. 'Tis fuffkiently evident from his words, that he is fpeaking of a falfe profeflion of faith 5 for he does not begin by faying, " if any one have faith)" but " if any man fay he hath faith;" by which he undoubted- ly fignifies that hypocrites boaft in the empty name of faith, altho' in reality they have no claim to it. — What then he here calls faith is a conceffion, as rhetoricians call it. For when we are only entering upon the difcuffion of a point, it doth not hurt the caufe, yea, it fometimes profiteth it, to give up to our opponent the word which he requires ; becaufe, when the queftion itfelf hath been inveftigatsd and refolv- jt;. But if a brother of ffler be naked, tec'] He takes an example from a common cafe. He. is exhorting; as hath been laid, to the offices of charity. If any one, in oppofition to him, (hould boaft that he is con- tent with faith without works; he compares this infignifieani f^.rh to that kind of language ed, the word is eafily recover- ed. As James then thought it fufficient to refute that ialfe pretext by which hypocrites fcreen themfelves ; he would net llir up any controverfy a* bout the word. Let us keep it in remembrance, however, that as often as he mentions the word faith here, he is not fpeaking according to the real fenie of his mind •, but is rather difputing againft thofe, who fallely pretend that they have faith, of which they are alto* gether deftitute. Canfaithfave him? As if he had faid, " 'Tig impoflible for us to obtain fa I* vation by a cold and bare know* ledge of God ; which all rea- dily grant to be true. For thus it is, that our falvation is of faith, becaufe faith unites us to God. And this is brought about by ingrafting us into the body of Chriftj fo that living by his fpirit, we may alfo be go- verned by him. But there is no fuch thing in this dead phan- tom of faith. ' lis not ftrange, then, that James deprives it of the power to fave. which bids a hungry man go and be filled, but which does not provide the food of which he is in want. As, then, he mocketh the poor man who puts him off by words, but give3 him no aid, fo they mock God, who frame to themfelves a life definite of good works and every pious duty. 17, EPISTLE OF JAMES. 4* 1 7. ... .. is dead being alone. J He calls that faith dead in it- felf, which is without good works. Whence we conclude that it is not faith j for where it is dead, it does not properly retain the name. The fophifts urge this expreffion as a proof that forae kind of faith may be found alone. But fuch frivo- lous cavilling is anfwered with- out difficulty ; efpecially as it is evident that the apoftle rea- fons fro'"n an impoffibility ; as Paul calls the angel accurfed who fhould endeavour to fub- vert the gofpel. — Gal. i. 8. ' But tho' we or an angel from * heaven preach any other gof- pel unto you, than that which we have preached unto you, \% let him be accurfed." 18. Yea, a man may fay, Thou haft faith, and I have works : (hew me thy faith without thy works, and I will (hew thee my faith by my works. 19. Thou believed that there is one God; thou doll well : the devils alfo believe and tremble. 18. Tea, a man may fay, &V.J Erafmus here introduces two converting together, one of whom boafts of faith without works ; the other of works without faith : and thinks both of them are confuted by the intervening anfwer of the a- poftle : but this notion appears to me to be too forced. He thinks it to be abfurd that this expreffion, " thou haft faith," fhould be fpoken in the perfon of James, who acknowledgeth no faith without works. But he is much miftaken in not difcovering, that thefe words are ufed ironically. The word tranflated yea, I take here to fignify but rather; and the word rendered a man to mean any man : and the fenfe will run thus: Sf But rather any man may fay, (to refute the foolifh vain glorying of thofe who imagine that they have faith, while by their walk and con- vention they difcover them- felves infidels) — thou hajl faith, <&c. For, fays James, it would be eafy for all who live godly to drive out of hypocrites that vain glorying with which they are elated — by thus addreffing them, " Shew me thy faith, " &c." Altho' the text more commonly in the Greek runs thus, " Shew me thy faith by " thy works." I rather, how» ever, incline to prefer the read- ing of the old Latin, which is alfo found in feveral Greek copies. By ordering them, then, " to fhew their faith without works, he argues from a thing impoiuble, in order to prove that 5° CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE that they have none. Thus the phrafeology is ironical. How- ever, if any one would rather follow the different reading, •' Shew me thy faith by thy works," it will amount to the fame meaning : for the activity of any thing mud be proved by works ; the fenfe then is, *' TJnlefs you fhow me the fruits of your faith, I deny that you are poiTefTed of any." But it may be afked, is an external probity of life a certain proof of faith ? for, fays James, " I will iliew thee my faith by my -works." — I anfwer, that the 1 9. Thou believe/} that there is one God, e again fliews that the queflion here is not concerning the caufe of our falvation — but is whether works nccefTarily accompany faith ? For in this fenfe faith is faid to have co-operated with works, becaufe it was not inactive. 'Tis faid to have been made perfect by works, not becaufe it re- ceives its perfection from works, but becaufe by thefe it is prov- ed to be real. As to that ftale diftinction of theirs, which the fophifts artfully draw from the words, of a faith formed and unformed, it (lands in no need of long refutation. For the faith of Abraham was formed and real before the facrificing of his fon. But that action was not the fmifhing part, fo to fpeak ; for many actions fol- lowed afterwards, by which Abraham demonflrated the in- creafe of his faith. Wherefore, neither was that the perfec- tion of his faith, nor did it then firfl receive a beginning. James then means nothing elfe, but that the perfection of his faith confiit&d in this, that itdif- played that diftinguHhed fruit of obedience. of neceflity, acknowledge the fcripture to be miferably wrefl- ed. — For let them do their belt, they will never bring it to pafs that the effect mould be prior to the caufe. That paf- fagc EPISTLE OF JAMES. 53 fage of Mofes, Gen. xv. 6. is cited ; " And Abram believed " in the Lord ; and he count- " ed it to him for righteouf- u nefs." The imputation of righteoufnefs, of which Mofes there fpcaks, preceded that work by which they would have A- bram to be juftified more than thirty years. Surely, as faith was imputed to Abraham for righteoufnefs, fifteen years be- fore Ifaac was born, it could not be on account of the facri- fice of his fon. Whoever main- tains that righteoufnefs was imputed to Abram before God, becaufe he facrificed his fon Ifaac, who was not yet born, when the holy fpirit pronoun- ced Abram a juftified perfon, can never give a fatisfactory anfwer to this point. There- fore it neceffarily remains that we fiiould maintain that fome- 25. Like wife, alfo, was not Rabab the harlot jujlifiedby works, is'c.~\ It appears ablurdto couple together characters fo unlike ' as thofe of Abraham and Ra- hab. "Why did he not rather choofe out fome from the great number of illuftrious patriarchs, whom he might join with A- braham ? Why does he pre- fer a harlot to them all ? 'Tis purpofely that he hath joined together two perfons fo very cppofite, that he might the more clearly demonftrate, that no perfon, of whatever condi- thing afterward is pointed at. Now, then, docs James fay that it was fulfilled ? Btcaufe, for certain, he would fhew us what kind of faith that was which juftified Abraham : viz. not an inactive and vain faith, but fuch a one as rendered him obedient to God ; as it is re- corded in Heb. xi. 8. " By " faith Abraham, when he " was called to go out into a. " place, which he fhould after " receive for an inheritance, " obeyed ; and went out, not f< knowing whither he went.'* The conclufion which immedi- ately follows, becaufe 'tis drawn from thence, admits of no other fenfe : man is not jufH-* fled by faith alone •, that is, by a bare and empty knowledge of: God. He is juftified by works; that is, his justification is known and proved from its fruits. tion, family or rank, was ever accounted among the number of the juftified and the faithful, without gocd works. He ha* named the moft diftinguifhed, by far, of all the patriarchs ; now, under the perfon of a harlot, he comprehends all, who, when they were alien* from the church, are ingrafted into her. Whomever, then, dcfires to be accounted juftified, even to obtain a place among the meaneft of fuch, let him, fhew himfelf fuch by his good works. Becaufe James, ac- Ii 2 cgrding 54 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE cording to his manner of writ- fication ; we acknowledge that "jng, fays that Rahab was juftf- good works arerequifite indeed fied by works, the fophifts to justification * but we diveft thence conclude, that we oh- them of all power to confer tain juftification by the merits juftification— becaufe they can- of cur works. But we deny not ftand before the tribunal that he is at all here treating of of God. the manner of obtaining julti- CONCLUSION. FROM the general fcope of this chapter, learn, ift, "Where- in the real excellence of a rational being confifts : not in the poffeilion of the honours, the riches, or the pleafures of this vain and perifhing world ; but in our relation to him who is the Lord of glory. Secure of his favour, clothed with his image, and holding his faith in righteoufnefs, feek ye the honours which are from above, the riches which neither moth nor ruft can corrupt, and ftudy that integrity of conduct which angels revere, and wherewith God himfelf ! s well pleafed. Be not deceived by any outward appearance, either in yourfelves or others ; but try to difcern and efteem real worth, wherever you behold It. Remember, that in matters of religion, the rich and the poor ftand on a level before God. He accepteth no man, on account of his riches, or his rank ; neither ought ye to have re- fpe£t, only, to him with the gold ring and the gay clothing. *< Hearken, my beloved brethren, hath not God chofen the poor <( of this world, rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom which ** he hath promifed to them that love him?" 2d, Wealth and honour frequently expofe to vice. They too often puff up with pride, and lead to oppreiiion, to the neglect of religion, and defpite of its great and glorious author. ** Do <{ not rich men opprefs you, and draw you before the judgment " feats ? Do not they blafpheme that worthy name by which ye " are called ?" Are ye rich ? Be on your guard againft thofe temptations, to which your circumitances in life, more imme- diately, expofe you. Remember, that God refifteth the proud, but giveth grace unto the humble. Remember, that the cries of the opprefTed go up unto him, and he will ere long vindicate the caufe of the injured. O ! remember what is to be the por- tion of the profane and blafphemous. Pfal. xi. 6. Are ye poor ? Be refigned to the will of providence : yea be thankful, that here- EPISTLE OF JAMES. S* r.ereby ye arc the Iefs in danger of falling into wic'kednefs. To be poor and wicked is moft miferable indeed : yet this is too generally the cafe. A want of truth and of honefty, mercilefs (lander and detraction, cruel envy, much filthy fpeaking, and too much blafphemy, even among the poor. O! man, no won- der thou art poor, whan this is thy manner of life ; when thou art at (o much pains to provoke God to make thee wretched here, arid miferable, beyond cxpreffion, hereafter. 3d, It will be the care of the real chriftian to yield an unU form obedience to all God's commands ; remembering, that he who faid, Do not commit adultery, faid alfo, Do not kill. Like God, he hates and abhors every falfe and wicked way; he has no defire to wink at or to indulge in any favourite vice, and cat* find no peace in his mind, while any wickednefs, of which he is confeious, cleaves unto him. He often lifts up his voice to heaven, in fervent fupplication, faying, " Take away my tranf- * c greflions, O God, and let not any iniquity have dominion compenfate £for all his other omifP.ons, and tranfgreifions. — Accordingly, we are informed, that it was a common practice among them, to fix on one fmgle commandment, and toexercife themfelves, chiefly, in this commandment. They generally made choice of that precept, which they conceived was leaft holtile to their favourite pleasures or interefts. It was ufually fome ritual and pofitive duty — fuch as tithes, anife, mint, and cumin ; while truth, mercy, and judgment were but little re- garded, and looked on as things only of inferior moment. This was palatable doctrine, and an eafy fort of morality ; but with- out any foundation in truth. On the contrary, the law of God was in direct oppofition unto it •, for fays the apoftle, " Who- " foever fhall keep the whole law, and yet, knowingly, offend " in one point, is guilty of all j for he that faid, Do not com- * f mit adultery, faid alfo, Do not kill. James does not meaa by this, however, that there is no difference in fins ; for fome, by reafon of aggravation, are more offenfive to God than others. iMor does he teach, that there will be no difference made in the punifhment of fin: for, " that fervant, who knew his mailer's " will, but did it not, (hall be beaten with many ilripes." — But, what the apoftle affirms, is, that the authority of the di- vine lawgiver is as much defpifed, by breaking any one of his laws, as by the violation of them all : that the tranfgreffor fhall be as certainly puniihed for one offence, as for many •, becaufc every fin deferves God's wrath and curfe, both in this life, and in that which is to come. Our God hates every falfe and wicked way, and there fhall, by no means, enter into his prefence, in heaven, any that are defiled, or make a lie. — Let no man, then, deceive himfelf, by imagining, that his good deeds can atone for his bad deeds : but, while he abhors every wickednefs, let him look to Him, who is become the end of the law for righteoufnefs, and by whofe merits alone, we obtain the re= miffion of all our fins. NOTE IV. " Faith formed and unformed." An unformed faith, according to the fchoolmen, was that which confifted, merely, in the affent of the mind, without having any influence on the affec~ tions, or on the conduct. This conceit gave birth to fome very lax and pernicious tenets ; viz. that a perfon might have true faith, and yet, no fear of God before his eyes. But this is entirely contradictory to what Paul teaches, Rom. x. 10. " that I « with 6q CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE "with the heart, man believeth unto righteoufnefs; and like- wife, to what James affirms, " that faith, without works,, is "j dead, being^ alone." True faith receives, and refts upon Chrift, as he is offered in the gofpel : but he is offered, not only for righteoufnefs, forgivenefs of fin, and peace with God i but alfo for fanflification. Therefore, fays Calvin, it follows , that faith can, by no means, be feparated from godly affection, and godly living ; but, wherever it prevails, it purifies the heart, works by love, overcomes the world, and is productive of the peaceable fruits of righteoufnefs.— It may, indeed, be lefs operative in one believer than in another ; but in no believer, does it always continue lifelefs and inactive. Faith formed, according to the fophifts, is a faith, which derives its juftifying power, principally, from charity. It is allowed, indeed, that charity is not the eflential form of faith ; out, in as much as it imparts a certain degree of perfection to faith, it, as it were, gives it fubftance, or form, fo as to be of efficacy, in order to juftify. The fcripture doctrine on this point is, that we are juftified by faith, not as a meritorious, but only as an inftrumental caufe. Charity being a fpecial ornament of faith, and only a fruit of it. NOTE V. [5] " You fee then, that a man is jujlified by works, and not by * { faitb only.'''' Thefe words, when contrafted with what Paul, an the iv. and v. chap, of the Romans, teaches on this fubject of juftification, have been the occafion of much controverfy among chriftians. The point, indeed, is important, and demands the attention of every perfon into whofe hands the gofpel is come. It is not to be fuppofed, that this revelation from God, which unfolds to us the riches of his mercy, would leave it unrefolved in what manner we actually obtain this mercy. One main pur- pofe, why Chrift came into this world, was to refolve this very queftion. He not only purchafed eternal life for us, by the fhedding of his precious blood, but he alfo clearly pointed out the way in which this falvation is to be obtained. An attentive reader of the New Teftament will perceive, that the doctrine of Chrift and of all .his apoftles is uniformly the fame on this fub- ject : fo that it is not owing to the teachers, but to our not underftanding aright what is taught, that any apparent contra- diction takes place. There are two confiderations which have not been fufficiently at- EPISTLE OF JAMES. 6t attended to in the queftion before us. lit, The proper accep- tation of the word juftified, as ufed by Paul and by James — whether they ufe it exactly in the fame fenfe ? 2d. The parti- cular fituation and circumftances of the perions to whom their •epiitles are infcribed, at the time when they were written. Paul ufes the word juft'fied in a law fenfe, fignifying much the fame as to abfolve, to acquit, and in particular reference to the guilt and the condemning power of fin, " being juftified by faith, we have peace with God." James ufes it as applied to character, to denote approbation or difapprobation, anting from a know- ledge and conviction that the adtor is juft what he fays he is. — Abraham believed in God, and as a proof of this, offered up his fon Ifaac, in obedience to the command of God, and God ap- proved his conduct to that degree, as to ccndefcend to fpeak to him in thefe remarkable words, faying, " Becaufe thou haft *' done this thing, and haft not with-held thy fon, thine only " fon : in bleffing I will blefs thee, and in multiplying I will n multiply thy feed as the ftars of heaven, and as the fand, " which is upon the fea-fhore j and thy feed fhall poffefs the w gate of his enemies." It is evident, then, both from what is faid of Abraham and of P.ahab, that James ufes the word juftified, in a different ac- ceptation from Paul — in a fenfe chiefly applied to conduct j whereas in Paul's fenfe, it refers principally to a man's ftate. Paul, in his reafoning on this fubj- cl: in the epiitle to the Romans, lay6 it down as an indifputable point, that both Jew and Gentile were under fin, and become guilty before God. But God can- not enter into covenant with finners ; he cannot receive them into favour till their fins are forgiven them. — There is no re- miffion of fin but through Chrifi : he is our peace : we are brought nigh unto God by his blood, and made accepted only in him, the beloved. Therefore, it follows, that our juftincation before God, and our being reconciled unto him, is a pure act of mercy, which we owe entirely to the interpofition and death of his fon. The neceffity of atonement and pardon, before men could have accefs to God, was clearly taught the Jews under the Old Teftament ; when God entered into particular covenant with them, Mofes took the blood of calves and of goats, with water, and fcarlet wool, and hyflbp, and fprinkled both the book and all the people. No Jew, under any defilement, was permitted t© come into the prefence of Jehovah till this impurity was I 3 waf;;- 52 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE wafhed away by facrifice, or feme ceremonial purgation. The moment the leper was dife'overed, he was feparated from the congregation, and compelled to refide by himfelf, till the k- profy departed from him : his hair and his garments, which had been infeded, were burned with fire, and he himfelf wafted again and again, before he Mas permitted to join in the public T/orfhip with his brethren ; Lev. xiii. 45- t0 the end - An >' beaii. offered in facrifice for the whole congregation of Ifrael was burned without the camp, becaufe it was reputed unclean, by having the fins of all the people on it ; whereas the other iacn- ficeswere ufually confumed on the brazen altar which flood on the north fide of the ark, and near the center of the camp.-— Lev. xvi. 17. ' The temple is often ftyled thehoufe of God, that place where Jehovah more immediately dwelt. To imprefs all the people with becoming fentiments of his immaculate purity, and to teach them that no finnt r can (land in God's prefence, till his iins are forgiven him, it was exprefsly enjoined, that he who touched a dead body, or had any fcab upon him, mould have no accefs ro the temple, till thefe impurities were removed; yea, to {how how great an enemy God is to every fin, even fins of ignorance prevented from joining in his worihip, tdl an a* tenement was made for them " In like manner, under the New • Teftament difpenfation, it is equally Irnpoffible to have accefs to God, fo as to be accepted of him, till our fins are forgiven 11s, 2nd we are delivered from the guilt of them, by fome atone-* ment being made. But, fays Paul, we have accefs to God, by the blood of Jefus, for he is our propitiation. We may now draw near with full aflurance of faith, having our hearts fprmK- led by Chrift's blood, and our fins forgiven us for his fake. — Tobe'juftined, then, in Faul's . fenfe, is to be abfolved from guilt, and accepted as righteous, only for the righteoufnefs of thrift imputed to us and received by faith. Hence it appears, that Paul reafons from the caufe to the efie£t j but James argues from the effea to the caufe : for he ufes the word juftified not to fignify the pardon of fin, or any zB. of abfolution, but to in- timate that God is well pleafed with the perfon's conduct, and juftifies or approves of it, becaufe there is no hypocrifyin him : for while he fays, he has faith, he proves the truth hereof by his works. This will appear ftill more evident by attending in the 2d place, to the filiation and circumtaccs of the perfons to - whom EPISTLE OF JAMES.' 6 3 whom their cpiflles are inferibed, and obferving whether they were exa&ly alike, ov in what refpects they were different : Paul wrote to a people, (the Romans) who were ignorant of the true God, and totally unacquainted with the way of accep- tance with God. Thefe heathens had been accuftomed to rely on the number and coft of their facrifices, for their acceptance with their own gods. If there were any Jews in this church at Rome, even the Jews founded their hopes on the merits of their anceftors — their facrifices and other toilfome rites. Both Jew and Gentile appear to have objecled to chriitiamty, that it taught too eafy a way of being received into the divine favour, and hereby leflened the character of the Deity. If men be jus- tified by grace alone, faid they ; why, this is making religion nothing — encouraging indolence, yea, opening a door to all man- ner of wickednefs. That thefe were their fentiments of the gofpel method of faivation, is evident from the way in which the r.poftle argues with them, in the iii. chap, of his epifUe ; and his being at fo great pains to prove that the doctrine of grace gave no countenance to vice : '* Do we make void the law through " grace? God forbid ; nay, rather, we eftablifh the law." The Jews were offended at Paul's doclrine, becaufe they could not endure to hear, that the Gentiles mould be fo readily and eafily admitted to partake with them in their hope through the Meffiah; and even to higher privileges than what they enjoyed. The Gentiles excepted alfo againit it, for they thought it by far too fimple and too eafy a way to eternal life, it being, in their opinion, a very fmall matter, to poiTefs that faith which the gofpel re- quired. Hence we find Celfus, one of its bittcrcft adverfaries, •alledging this as the chief reafon for Conftantine's converfion ; i{ That he was mown a much eafier way of faivation from his /ins by the chriilian teachers, than by the heathen priefts." Paul, in the iii. and iv. chap, of the Romans, endeavours to remove the prejudices and oppofition both of the Jews and of the Gen- tiles, by {hewing, " that on account of the. finfulnefs and guilt of all men, fuch an exhibition of mercy as the gofpel unfolded, fuch a promife of pardon and acceptance, on account of that atonement which Jefus Chrift had made by his death, was abfolutely neceffary ; and had not God in his mercy appointed this method of faivation, all mankind mult have perifhed for ever in their fins." The perfons, then, with whom Paul rea- fons in his epiftle to the Romans, conceived that works did every thing in order to procure juftification with God. It was very 6 4 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE very different with thofe to whom James infcribes his epiftle, and with whom he argues in the ii. chap, from the 19. ver. to the end. Their conceptions as to faith, and the efficacy of it, were in direct oppofition to the fentiments of Paul's difputants : for they feem to have maintained, that faith was all in all ; and magnified the virtue of it to fuch a degree as to lead the adver- faries of chriftiaility to think, that the gofpel permitted the total neglect of good, works, and taught its fubjecls to view with in- difference the moft effential duties of the law. This was an entire mifconception of the nature and defign of the gofpel, and that very miflake of the law being made void by grace, which Paul had been at fo much pains to correct in his epiftle to the Romans. James as well as Paul knew the danger of permitting liis countrymen to continue in fo pernicious an opinion. It is obvious, then, that both concur in maintaining the glory of Chrift, and the credit of his gofpel. Paul declares, workscan- not juflify, " but we are juftified freely by the grace of God, '* through the redemption which is in Chrift Jefus our Lord." James affirms, that faith cannot juflify, for faith itfelf is only a fruit of our juftification, and unlefs the other fruits of juf- tification are connected with faith, it is vain to magnify its virtue, and a deception to rely on it. CHAP. III. A T Y brethren, be not many mailers, knowing that we ■*^*- mail receive the greater condemnation. 2. For in many things, we offend all. If any man offend not in word, the fame is a perfect man, and able alfo to bridle the whole body. 3. Behold, we put bits in the horfes mouths, that they may obey us j and we turn about their whole body. 4. Behold, alfo, the mips, which, tho' they be fo great, and are driven of fierce winds, yet are they turned about with a very fmall helm, whitherfoever the governour lifteth. £. Even fo the tongue is a little member, and boafteth great EPISTLE OF JAMES. ^5 great things. Behold how great a matter a little fire kindleth ! I. My brethren, be not many mqfiers, fac] The common and generally received interpreta- tion of this paflage is, that it diffuades us from desiring the ofiice of teaching — and on this account, becaufe 'tis dangerous; and fhould any one fail in it, he is liable to the fevere judgment of God. — And they are of opinion, that he fays be not many, becaufe 'tis neceffary there fhould be fome. But, by ma/fers I underftand, not thofe who difcharge fome public ofBce in the church ; but thofe who ufurp the right of cenlbrs upon othert;; for fuchcenfurers would willingly be efteemed the maf- ters of manners, as it were. — And this form of fpeech, to call thofe mafters, who fu- percilioufly animadvert upon others, is very common both among the Greeks and Latins. And he forbids them te be many, becaufe many fuch are every- where thrufting themfelves for- ward. This is a difeafe innate, as it were, in the human dif- pofition — to catch at fame by the cenfuring of others : but, here, a double vice reigns — that tho' few be qualified, all promifcuoufly thrult themfelves into the office of a matter. — And again, few of them are in- fluenced by a right view ; for hypocvify and ambition actuate them rather than a regard for the falvation of their brethren. 'Tis to be obferved, that James is not here difluading from bro- therly admonitions, which the fpirit fo often, and fo much re- commends to us ; but that he is condemning that immoderate defire, which ariies from pride and ambition, of exalting our- felves above our neighbour, of reviling, cenfuring, backbiting, and malicioufly inquiring out every thing which they cnn turn to his difadvantage. 'Tis ufual for fuch cruel cenfurers of others, to boaft themfelves with irrfolence in their fearchea into the vices of others ; from this intemperance and arrogance of conduct James diffuades us : and he gives the reafon, viz. that they fhall undergo a more fevere judgment themfelves, •who are fo fevere upon others. He impofes a fevere law upon himfelf, who judgeth of the words and actions of others, according to the ftricteft rigour; nor does he deferve forgivenefs, who cannot bear to fpare ano- ther. The general fcope and fenfe is carefully to be noticed, namely, that thofe who arc too rigid againft their brethren pro- voke the feverity of God againft themfelves, 2- Fsr, 66 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE 2. For, in many things, %ve offend all, ii. Doth a fountain fend forth at the fame place fweet water and bitter ? 12. Can the fig-tree, my brethren, bear olive berries? Either a vine, figs ? So Can no fountain both yield fait water and frefh. 7. For every kind, &c.~] This verfe is a confirmation of die laft. — From that lie proves, that fatan reigns in the tongue with an aftonifhing power, which cannot by any means be kept in order; and amplifies upon the fubjecT by adducing comparifons. — For, fays he, there is no animal fo fierce, cruel, or violent, but it may be tamed by the induftry of man— -that fifties, which in Come meafure, inhabit another world — birds, fo much inclined to motion and wandering — -and even ferpents, the enemies of the human race, are fometimes tamed. Since, then, the tongue cannot be reftrained, there muft be concealed in it fome fecret and lurking fire of hell. What he fays with regard to wild beads, ferpents, and other creatures, is not to be under- stood of them all : 'tis enough that the art of man hath fuc- ceeded in reducing to obedience 9. Therewith blefs we God^ &v.] This is a ftriking fpeci- men of its deadly poifon, that by its cxceffive levity it thus transforms itfelf. For tho' it may pretend t^ blefs God, it and complaifance fome of the fierccft among the beads •, and alfo that ferpents are fome- times tamed. Therefore, lie ufes both tenfes — the prefent " is tamed," and the perfect, V.] He appears to fignify that the mind of" man, when it indulges in wicked lulls, is infatiable : and truly it is fo ; for he who fuffers his appetites licentioufly to domineer, will never have any bounds to his lulls and ■deiires. Yea even if the world were given him, he would wifh for new worlds to be created on his account. — Thus, it comes to pafs, that men pro- cure to themfelves torments which furpafs the cruelty of all executioners. So true is the obfervation of Horace, " That even Sicilian tyrants have not invented a torment greater than envy and malevolence." — Te fght ; he means not thofe wars and fightings, in which men engage fword in hand ; but any contentious ftrife, whereby one 3 . Te afk, and receive not, one refifts him, the more keen- ly he preffes his attacks. For iatan in feme fort trifles where lie is not ferioufly oppofed, but ■exerts all his ftrength aeainft tnoie who refift him : and again Jie is never weary with fighting, 8. Draw near to Cod, <&V.J He again puts us in remem- brance, that God's affiftance -will not be wanting to us, provided we give him a wel- come reception. For when he bids us draw near to God, that we may experience him draw- ing near to us, he means, that we are deprived of his grace, becaufe we withdraw ourfelves from hint. And while God is on our fide, we need not be afraid of failing in the conflict. But if any one fhould infer from this pafTage, that the prin- cipal part depends upon cur- felves, and that the grace of God afterwards follows ; the apoftle means nothing fuch : for if it ought fo to be, it does not follow that it is in our power fo to a£t. And when the fpirit of God encourages us to duty, he derogates nothing from himfelf or, his own power, but even accomplifhes in us the very thing which he enjoins.-— Jn fine, James meant nothing elfe in this pafTage, than that God is never wanting to us, but, if conquered in one en- gagement, immediately com- mences another. I anfwer to this, that by fleeing from us here, we are to underftand hi« being put to the rout : and tho' indeed he renew inceffant at- tacks, he always comes off worded in the end. unlefs it be becaufe We alienate ourfelves from him. The in- vitation, then, to draw near to God i is of (imilar import, as if any one were to carry along with him, the hungry to a table, or the thirfty to a foun- tain. It importeth this : that as we are apt to {tumble and fall, our goings fhould be di- rected and upheld by the Lord. Again, as to that cavilling ob- jection ; " that the grace of God is made fecondary, and as it were attendant upon our pre- paration •" becaufe James fays, in the latter place, " that Gcd will draw near to us," it is altogether frivolous j for we know that it is nothing uncom- mon for God to irtcreafe hh former gifts of the fpirit by new- ones; nnd in this manner, mor-e and more, to enrich thofe, on whom he had formerly bellow- ed much. Cleanfe your hands, %e Jinners, &c. He here addreffes ail who are alienated from God: nor does he, however, point at two kinds of perfons ; but the fame, he calls botiiflnners and EPISTLE OF JAMES. ?: and double minded. Nor does he mean finners of any kind ; but the wicked, and thofe of an abandoned life. As when John faith, chap. ix. 31. " God ** heareth not finners." In which fenfe the woman is cal- led a (inner by Luke, chap. vii. 37. ; and by the fame and other evangelifts it is faid, " he eat- eth and drinketh with finners." Wherefore, James invites not all promifcuoufly to that kind of repentance here mentioned; but thofe who are of a perverfe and corrupt heart, and of a 9. Be afflifted and mourn and iveep, <&V.] Chrift, in Luke vi. 25. denounces forrow, to thofe who laugh now, as a curfe. " Wo unto you that " laugh now : for ye fhall " mourn and weep." And in the beginning of the next chap- ter, James, in the fame fenfe, threatens mourning to the rich. But here he treats of that falu- tary forrow which leads to re- pentance : he addreffes him- ielf to thofe, who being in- toxicated in their minds, per- ceive not the judgment of God ; and hence it comes to pafs that 10. Humble yourf elves, <&c.~]^— This is the conclufion of the former verfes. That, then, the grace of God will be manifes- ted to lift us up, when he fhall fee that we have humbled our proud fpirits. We drive and bafe, feandalous, and wicked life : from thefe he require* purity of heart and propriety of conduct:. Whence we gather what the true meaning and na- ture of repentance is ; namely, when not only the external life is amended, but when it com- mences by the purification of the mind : as with refpect to the converted perfon, it is ne- ceffary, that the fruits of an inward repentance fhould ap- pear by the purity of their works. they indulge in their vices. — To roufe them from this fatal ftupidity, he admoniflies them, that affected with a confeien- tious grief, they (liould learn to be afRi&ed and mourn ; and. while bordering on deftru£rion, fhould ceafe to indulge them- felves in a partial and flattering' felf-approbation. — Let your laughter be turned, iyc. Laugh- ter is here taken for the plea- fures which the wicked make for themfelves, while, infatua- ted by the enticing fweets of vice, they live forgetful of God and his judgments. envy, becaufe we wifh to be exalted. This is a prepofterous method : for it is a diftingui(h- ing characleriftic of God to raife up the bowed down, and efpecially thofe who voluntari- ly abafe themfelves. Whofo- M ever, »4 CALVIN's COMMENTARY ON THE ferved fomewhere, that as the tree muft ftrike its roots deep, that it may grow upwards ; fo whofoever has not his mind Tooted in humility, is exalted ever, then, dejected from a fenfe of his own weaknefs, afpires to liable exaltation, let him not, on account of his abafement before God, enter- tain any mean opinion of him- to his own downfal felf. Auguftine has well ob- ii. Speak net evil, one of another, brethren: he that fpeaketh evil of his brother, and judgeth his brother, fpeaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law : but if thou judge the lav/, thcu art not a doer of the law, but a judge. 12. There is one lawgiver, who is able to fave and to deftroy : who art thou that judgefl another ? 1 1 . Speak not evil, &c.} We fee what a deal of pains he takes in correcting the luft of evil fpeaking. Hypocrify is always proud ; and by nature \ye are hypocrites, who eagerly exalt ourfelves and degrade others. There is another dif- eafe natural tothehuman mind, that every one would have o- thers live according to his own will and humour. This rafh- nefs of daring to impofe a rule of life upon our brethren, James, ■with great propriety, rebukes m this paffage. Evil fpeaking he takes for all the calumnies and froward fpeeches which proceed from a malignant and pevverfe judgment. The per- nicious confequenccs of evil- fpeaking extend widely : but he here properly inGfts only on that one fpecies which I have mentioned, namely — when we fupercilioufly determine con- cerning the words and actions' of others, and fecurely con- demn whatever difpleafes us, as if our caprice were to be a law for their conduct. That fuch arrogance is here pointed at, is manifefr. from the reafon annexed. He that fpeakeib evil of ha brother,