-7n~~~ h THE ZZ'J HUMMBLE THOUGHTS, O F Some fober and judicious Christians, CONCERNING The Affair of the Reverend Mr. Jo H N G L ASS, Miniftcr of the Gofpel at T e a 1 1 n g, To be before the venerable ASSEMBLY, to meet at Edinburgh, May xd 3 1728. Printed in the Year MDCCXXVIII. mmtmmm Price Twopence, ^c^ *%^ C 3 ) Z2$ The humble "Thoughts of fome foher and judicious Chriftians, concerning the Jf- fair of the Reverend Mr. John Glafs, (jc. E reckon it is the Duty of all Chriftians, to give Ac- count of their Thoughts fo- berly and feriouily to their Teachers, on Matters of great Moment, wherein the Inte- reft of real Religion is deeply concerned, that all may be helpful one to another * fo as no Steps be made to the Detriment of real Godlinefs, nor crofs to the true .Means for fupporting and advancing it. Therefore have prefiimed to lay before the World, what we reckon juft, and are well and furely informed of in this Cafe. We are then fure, that Mr. Glafs did always, fince he had a Charge, apply hit Work in the Minifiry laboriously and confcientiouily, relating to private Souls * and that of late efpecially,he has been fig- nally ufeful in preaching, and advanced the greateft and belt Matter for Edificati- on 5 That God profperedhim more than his Neighbours in his Congregation, as is no- A z tourly tourly known ; ngnally own'd him and his j People the very teft Sacrament difpenfed 1 by him this Seafon ; and that he has gain- J e^7 the Influence Parties, carnal and felfift Considerations, have on fome Minifters, while they labour in carnal Policy, as much as under Prelacy, and People "too vifib- Uy and openly feek the Credit or Name, more than the Life or Power of Religion, or true Confcience thereof, in Conformi- ty to the whole of GOD's Wordj for Mi- nifters tamper with Elders and People, efpecially with thofe who are Patrons, to get in tlieir own Creatures to Corners, to make up the Club of their Gang and Way, yet cry out againft Patronages*, and People are taught to cry out againft all, but thofe who are for the Marrow* and to cry them up, however mean, to the Skies, and thofe who blindly cry up the publick Covenants, without explain- ing them to their People ; tho' this' be done to ferve a Turn for a Congregati- on, or for Credit when in it, for fear of loffng the People, who muft be kept and pleafed, whatever they fay or do: So that the moft naughty and ignorant, are like to become the Rulers of our Faith and Management. This was what raifed the firft Schifm in Angus: For fome from the South, who found the Noife, not the Knowledge, of their Country ,for the Marrow and public!* B z Co. ( n ) Covenants, raifcd themfelves by both, ex- claimed againft all others, and the Gene- rality being dull and ignorant, let them go on; and one of Mr. Glafs his greateft Antagonifts was the firft who brought the* Marrow to T)undee y and the other the Noife about the Covenants, before the People came to underftand what belong- ed to their own Souls. 'Tis true, Mr. Glafs was fufpe&ed at firft, of going into the too formal and groundlefly comfortable Way of Marrow Preachers, but took Offence at their lax Way of Communicating in all Corners, where in too many Places, they received the Marrow Teople from Edinburgh and other Corners to Com- municate at Dumfermling&t Portmosrk and Orwell* without Lines from their own Minifters, and the fame Way in other Places about the Covenants. This gave a Difguft to Mr. Glafs his Confcience; and be began to Reform, as to the Way of Communicating, at Home, and to vent his Thoughts Abroad, which gave great Ir- ritation, in as far as it condemned the Practices and Managements of others, li- pon which too free Perfonal Reflexions followed.And then he was threatned by one of his great and violent Antagonifts,that all the Profeflbrs would feparatefrom him at Strath- ( is ) ^ Strathmartin Sacrament, Anno 1726. in Cafe he fhould there tell the Thoughts of his Heart freely, asr to thefe Matters. Which Threatning he look'd on as a hu- *Wne Device, to make him quit his Light without Information, and therefore did vent bimfelf too forvvardly. After which, two or three Minifters brought it into the Committee of Overtures at a Synod ; which, if others more wife had been pre- fcnt, had not been done, as wc are told by themfelves $ bin being once marked, could not be recalled. Upon this, tbofe who never before ihew'd Zeal for pub- lick Covenants, thought that a proper Seafon to be about with Mr. Glafs, for condemning their Practice about Com- municating, and other Parochial andPres- byterial Managements, and fo a Speat of Concert and Driving arofe againft him, till it came from the Synod to the Presby- tery of Dundee, with Correfpondents ( tho' regularly the Affair ought to have been firit tabled in that Presbytery.) They trea- ted him indeed upon the main civilly, Chriftianly, and kindly; but for fome per- fonal and club Irritations, provoked bim ' unaccountably todifown the Divine Right of the Government of the Church, efpe- cially the too evident one of the Commit- tee, ( -14 > tee, who were appointed to draw up an Abftra& of bis Procefs, to belaid before the Commiflion of Affembly, in March 1728, and did infert therein, the\dnti- nomianifm, which was turned out of tha rectified Copy of the Extraft of thatfarge Procefs, for which filly Piece of Art, that Committee could not account. And af- ter all, we do not fee, that feveral Pro- pofitions in the rectified Charge, as they ]y abfolutely, without being otherways ?ualified, can be Ground of Charge for ribel or Cenfure ; Which, it would feem, the Synod who met in April 1728, fore- feeing, proceeded to put Queries to him, without any Warrant from the General Affembly, that Power being given only Jnno 1726, to the Committee of Affembly, for the Purity of Doctrine, and to the Com- mittee on Profeffor Simpfon\ Affair, who had the AffemblyYfull Powers as to ex- pifcating, ufque ad "fententiam. And how a Committee of the Commiffion, or even the Commiffion it felf, could ad vife, with- out Authority from the Affembly, to re- quire his Adherence to, and Re-fubfcrip- on of the ConfeJJion of Faith and formula* without a new A£t of Affembly, we can- not underftand ; efpecially after the Af- fembly 1722, fucha Motion being made .0 < ij ) ^r' to the Committee of Overtures, it was re- jetted, and refufed to be tranfmitted to the Affembly. And we much lefs under- hand, how the Synod came to propofe to Mr. G/q/s Twenty feven Queries ( and fome of tfcem on Things whereof a fama could not fo much as be pretended ) to which he was required to anfwer injlan- ter, or next Day at Ten of the Clock Forenoon precifely, without Authori- ty from the Affembly, Precognition ta- ken, or a Libel framed. All th*fe, and the Precipitancy of a Sentence of Sufpen- fion, againft him, and Mr. Archibald, in one and the fame Night, and on much alike Grounds, are Surprifes, and very ihocking to us; tho' we condemn his Pe- culiarities, for we would have all to get fair Play, to avoid Injuftice andOffence ; and if any have that, according to the publick Rules of the Church, and juft Meafures, he mull reft fatisfied as to the publick Conftitution ; but the Minds of many, who wifh well to the Church, can*- not be fatisfied without this. As to Mr. Glajs hisrefufingtheF<;r#ftf- \Ja 1711, wc cannot approve of him, as to [>be only true publick Management; tut \ we hope, it will never be ftretched to : Chriftiau Communion, fo as he, who is 0)3 ce i ** . ( 16 ) once in the Church, and has not Light t continue, ihould be firft depofed from th ho]y Miniftry, as if he were not longe a Minifier of Chrift $ for wfc take Inde pendents, yea, and Church of Englan Men to be real Minifiers, when^duly qm lifted with Grace, Gifts, and found DoQ. rine : And if upon Mr. Glafs his Obfti nacy, or want of Peace to forbear preach ing the Gofpel, Depofition or Excommu nication Ihould follow, we could nor bi fatisfied to excommunicate a good wor thy Man, for his not having Light intc the true Government of the Church, whicl we take to be Presbyterian, by Judicative! of divine Appointment: Yet can not thinl Catholicks fhould go to Extremes, bu Ihould follow the Pattern of the Pri mitive Church, with Refpeft to the Do- natifis and others, who were not pleafed with the Catholick Management, Conft : - tution and Judicatories, an uKoimvYitrfa Repudiation or Rejection from the Ma- nagement, and ordinary Communion, and to be pleafed with their own Communi- on, which was far from difowning them to be Minifters or Chriflians, but that they could not yield the publick Manage- ment in their Way to them, nor we to him, much lefscan we own all Church J Go- ( i 7 y ^3 Government of Judicatories 'to be a hu- mane Eftablifhment ,• yet we deffire to be render of thofe who, differ from us, efpecially .of him, tho' through Irritati- on and partial Views he loft the Light he once had ; yet his chief and main Light remains as to all neceffary Articles of Faith, except as to the Divine Government of die Church, which we reckon neceffa- ry for the publick Management, tho' not for all private Souls, or Minifters emi- nent and worthy. And 'tis notour, many little worth own this laft, but with no Knowledge or Confcience, but for Cre- dit and Intereft, which is worfe. to Mi- nifters and People, when they want the Knowledge and true Management, for the Well of their own Souls,and thofe of o- thers, than his Lofs as to the Govern- ment, when he is in iuch Cafe to be ufe- ful to Souls ; whereas a legal Eftablifhment never fails to have many in it, of no Spi- ritual Ufe ; yet we thank GOD for the legal Eftabliihmenr, but wifh, thofe violent agairift Mr. Glafs> would examine their own true Light,Confciences and Manage- ments, for the weli and real Salvation of their People, which too many negleft, and glory in" their Regard to the publick Church, which we have the greateft Re- C gard ( 18 } gard to ; bub we cannot think, this will, of it felf,fatisfy the Conferences of Minifters or People, and reckon fome may want Light, as to the publick Church, who may be fafely allowed to be godly Minifiers and People, tho' their Way, as wanting Light, ought not to be the publick Rule. Upon the Whole, we think it hard, to de- clare Mr. Glafs to be qo Minifter of Chrifl, or to continue the Sufpenfion laid on fo precipitantly, till 3 full Procefs be carried on againft him, and finifhed, that all true Grounds anent him may be fair- ly and clearly feen proven, as vented to publick Hurt ; feeing Sentiments of no bad Influence remaining in the Mind, are not liable to Cenfure, nor thefe extorted, as his were,at the Synod, and the* Presby- tery and Correfpondents calling for his declaring Adherence, without due Autho- rity from the Aflembly. A Precognition or regular Procefs, and an dwiveifm^ Socinianifm y Arianifm, or Ignorance, to be fuftained as Chriftians, as is notoudy feen. There- fore there muff be fome, at leaft the low* eft Appearance of Serioufnefs for publick Covenanting, as well as for the Sacraments of the hordes Supper and*Baptifm> as thoie who fram'd the Reformation Covenant^ in- timate in its Boforn ; and if it were o- C 3 therways y ( 20 ; therways, it would be a profaning of the Name of Chrift, we mean, taking publick Covenants by the openly profane allow- ing them, and much more forcing them. We cannot understand, how the Com- mittee of the Commiffion, could, without Warrant of the Affembly, give Power to fufpend, upon his refuting the Formula, or how the Synod could do if, efpecial- ly after the Affembly 1722, fhewed fo much Tendernefs to the Reprefenters, who are much groffer in Principles ruin- ing to Souls than he, even tho 7 they a- vowed of thefe in Face of Affembly, and protefled againft the Affembly's Aft, yet there were none of them fufpended or depofed ,• nor was Profeffor Simpfon, An- no 1716, tho'he reclaimed againft thelaft Aft ot that Affembly •, yea, tho' he was, and flill is very grofsin his Principles, yet there were neither Queries put to him, nor he fufpended, till a Precognition was taken, fome Articles found proven, and a Committee was ordered to proceed. The Reprefenters felt no Evil, tho" their Prede- ceffors the Non-jurers and they, have made horrid Schifms at Sacraments, and thereby difowned the Divinity of the Go- vernment of the Church* in effeft, tho* fp cunning, as to diffemble Regard to it; yet I 21 ) z^7 yet the Nonjurers and Reprefenters, did fly openly in the Face of A&s of Affem- bly i7i2,and 1722, and remain untouched, and that in Favours of-more dangerous Practices and Principles ; yea, giving an drnvwyvtey or Repudiation from their Sa- craments to the beft of their Brethren* Nor are they lefs plain againft all pubJick Covenanting, than Mr. Gla/s; only they' can fallow Contradictions; For, imo> They openly preach the Covenants of Re- demption and Grace to be all one, or their Identity i fo that if we engage to the Co- venant of Grace, wje mull engage at the fame Time to the Covenant of Redemp- tion, or in it, as Parties, which can bear no lefs, than to put our felves in ChrifTs Room and Place. 2J0, They reckon the Elett Members of Chrift their Head from all Eternity, fo that he engaged to the Covenant of Redemption, or in ir,as Head, and they as Members. %tio, They fay, the Covenant of Grace was tianfacted with Chrift from all Eternity, and what need have we to engage in Time I 4^,. They fay, Believers in Chrift are Bankrupt, anH can not be in Cafe to keep Faith, and what need then to engage ? $ta, They fay, there are no Duties in the Covenant of Grace, and to what then fhould we engage I - - ( 22 ) engage? 6to 9 That publick Covenants, and the Covenant of Grace are not all one ,• and where can be the Obligation, or perpetual Obligation of publick Cove- nants, if that's the Cafe £ qmo, That the Sinai Covenant, and fo all Old Tejlament Covenants, afe Covenants of Works ; and how can we then argue for publick Alew Tejlament Covenanting by any moral Rea- fon from thefe I 8vo, They mention a Covenant of Duties, different from the Co- venants of Grace, Redemption, and Works, what it can be -we know not. From all which, they really mine all pub- lick and private Covenanting ; and why Mr. Qlafs fliould fuffer, and they be fpa- red, or allowed to be his Perfecutors, we know not. Plain, open, and confident Truth tells always belt, better want Light, than to have inconfiftent Lights. As for the Confeffion of Faith, Mr. Glafs refufes only the Judicatories, and one Ar- ticle of the 23d Chapter, left he fhould own the civil Magiftrate. as a Church- Officer,which none of as do; yet have all due Refpect to the Civil Magiftrate, and prefent Eftablifhment. We own the Judi- catories, yet would not have them abfo- lute as Popifh Councils^ but to have a declarative Authority, to give out the true Senfe i 23 j <*- as Mr. Hill Re&or of Kilmmgton has demonftrate the Intrinfik Call and Authority of Church-Judicatories to atft under Chrift immediately, independently of the' Civil Magiftrate, and yet with all due Regard to the Magistrate, again!* Doctor Wake's Aphorifms j all which, if digefted by Mr. Glafs, we would hops to have a comfortable Account of fcim.