i THE "Spruce street lectures, DELIVERED BY SEVERAL CLERGYMEN, DURING THE AUTUMN AND WINTER OF 1831-32. ' TO WHICH IS ADDED, A LECTURE ON THE IMPORTANCE OF CREEDS AND CONFESSIONS : WITH AN APPENDIX, BY SAMUEL* MILLER, D. D. Professor of Ecclejiiastical History and Church Government in the Tlieological Seiui- nary, Princeton, N. J. PHILADELPHIA: RUSSELL AND MARTIEN, 9 GEORGE STREET. 1833. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1833, by RUSSELL & MARTIEN, in the Clerk's Office of the Eastern District of Penn- sylvania. RU.SSEIJL AND AIARTIEN, TKlNTERsi, GEOllGE STREET. THE ELDERS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IN THE UNITED STATES. THIS VOLUME IS RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED RY THE EDITOR. THE EDITOR'S ADVERTISEMENT. To the Members of the Presbyterian Church. This course of Lectures was founded in prayer. The design was to furnish the members and families of the Presbyterian Church, with a Manual containing interesting and popular discussions of some of the most important subjects, both doctrinal and ecclesiastical, taught in the "Confession of Faith." When doubts are entertained in regard to any point of faith, taught by our holy religion and our venerable stand- ards, it is important that the members of the Church should be furnished with a calm and able defence of those truths which are called in question. The well known character of the gentlemen engaged in this course, will be regarded as a sufficient recommenda- tion of the volume. Although the work is especially dedicated to the Elders of the Presbyterian Church, yet it is commended to the patronage of all its members. And that the Spirit of God may attend this defence and inculcation of the truth which He inspired, is the prayer of your brother in the Gospel, SAMUEL G. WINCHESTER. Philadelphia, January, 1833. CONTENTS. Page. Preface, . y^ . . v Introduction. By Rev. Dr. Green, . . ix Lecture I. — The Inability of Sinners considered. By Rev. Dr. -/isk, . . 9 Lecture II. — The Fall of Man^ and its effects. By Rev. Dr. Janeway, . 41 Lecture III. — The Use of the Means of Grace. By Rev. Dr.'fiow, . 69 Lecture IV. — On Church Discipline. By Rev. Mr. M^Farlane, . . 105 Lecture VI. — On the Nature of the Atonement. By Rev. Professor^odge, 143 Lecture VII. — On Ecclesiastical Polity. By Rev. Dr.^iller, . . 171 Lecture VIII. — On Regeneration. By Rev. Dr. 'iMartin, . . .215 Lecture IX. — On Justification. By Rev. Dr. '-Keill, ... 239 Lecture X. — On Christen Missions. By Rev. John*Breckinridge, . . 255 ADDENDUM. Lectujce on Creeds and Confessions. By Rev. Dr. 'I'liller 299 ERRATA. Page 10, line 7 from top, /or declation read declaration. " 12, "14 " for divide read describe. " 37, *' 1 " for planned read placed. " 74, " 5 " for And the read Another. " 92, " 2 " strike out must. " 173, "5 " for sustain read restrain. " 210, " 8 " for ask read act. INTRODUCTION, BY REV. ASHBEL GREEN, D. D. OF PHILADELPHIA The framers of the Constitution of the Presbyterian Church in the United States, introduced their Form of Church Government by specifying certain *< preliminary principles," or fundamental truths, as the basis on which the whole superstructure had been erected, or by which, as they express it, "they were governed in the formation of the plan.'^ In this statement of radical or elementary principles, the fourth section is as follows: "That truth is in order to goodness; and the great touchstone of truth, its tendency to promote holiness; according to our Saviour's rule, 'by their fruits ye shall know them.' And that no opinion can be either more pernicious or more absurd, than that which brings truth and falsehood upon a level, and represents it of no consequence what a man's opinions are. On the contrary, they are persuaded that there is an insepa- rable connexion between faith and practice, truth and duty. Otherwise it would be of no consequence either to discover truth or to embrace it." "The innocence of error," was a favourite dogma of in- fidel writers and loose moralists, of the last age; and it was X INTRODUCTION. against this, that the foregoing statement was intended to be more immediately directed. But this mischievous sen- timent was, it is believed, never so openly avowed and formally defended, as in the present age; for it is only a modification of the principle, while the essence is retained, which we find now advocated by some of the most distin- guished literary men of Europe, in the position ^*that a man is not responsible for his belief or opinions." To de- monstrate the falsehood of this baleful doctrine, which goes to the subversion of all moral obligation, and all religious faith and practice, is now the task of the able and erudite friends of revealed truth and Christian duty, both in the old world and the new. But many reject (it may be with honest abhorrence) the error we contemplate, when broadly stated and viewed in its extreme, who, nevertheless, tolerate it, and even plead for it, in some of its degrees and modifications. What but this is virtually advocated, when a strict and strenu- ous adherence to sound doctrine and a jealous fear of its violation, are made the subject of undisguised reproach, or represented as the indication of a narrow and bigot- ted mind; and when active exertions for the promotion of visible religion are extolled, as marking not only great- er liberality of mind, but more of genuine piety, than is to be expected among those who are tenacious of an orthodox creed? This we often hear; and does it not imply that truth, or just principle, is not necessary to the best action ? is not always favourable to it ? or, may be even less fa- INTRODUCTION. xi vourable than principles received with little examination, and partaking of a mixture of error? Now the very oppo- site of this is held, and it is believed must be held, by all who understand and honestly profess an attachment to the standards of the Presbyterian Church. It is readily admitted that there may be a zealous contention for abstract principles of truth, or for sound and orthodox doc- trine, without activity in promoting the cause of God in the world; yea, with the destitution of all vital and practical god- liness. The truth may be held in unrighteousness. Let this, whenever apparent, be unsparingly censured and pointedly condemned. Let it be shown, as it easily may be shown, that there is a glaring inconsistency between what they pro- fess, and what they do, or what they refuse to do, in all who maintain with ardour the truth as it is in Jesus, and yet vio- late his precepts themselves, by withholding their best energies for the extension of his cause and kingdom, and the salvation of perishing sinners. But let it not be inti- mated or implied, that there is any other safe and firm basis for right action, than truth or sound doctrine; far less, that without this, there may be a better practical system than with it. If such, for a time, seem to be the fact in any given instance — -as it is conceded that it may — the result will assuredly prove, that when the mixed system of truth and error becomes fully developed, and is seen in its fruits, effects and consequences, the want of strict adherence to sound doctrine will be strikingly and lamentably apparent, in practical evils of a very pernicious character. In a word, xii INTRODUCTION. let it be remembered, that as there is an icy orthodoxy^ so there is also a fanatical heat, and that both are to be carefully avoided; that the truth is to be strenuously main- tained, and to be fully carried out into practice; and that that practice or course of action will be the most correct, the most exemplary, and the most firm and efficient, which rests for its foundation on the greatest measure of truth, held in its greatest purity. So says, and truly says, our Consti- tution, as already quoted, ^^ Truth is in order to goodness- there is an inseparable connexion between faith and prac- tice, truth and duty; the great touchstone of truth is its tendency to promote holiness." The fact is too palpable to be denied, that in the Presby- terian Church, at the present time, doctrines not in accord- ance with our public standards, are freely promulgated, both from the pulpit and the press; that it is a favourite topic with many of the advocates and propagators of these doc- trines, to represent them as better adapted to the awakening of careless sinners, producing revivals of religion, and mul- tiplying converts, than those contained in our Confession of Faith and Catechisms — understood as these formularies cer- tainly were understood, by those who formed them, and as they are still held and taught, by those who adhere to them in their genuine import. Those who think that they ought to disregard or violate our doctrinal creed, do not act consistently in retaining their connexion with a Church whose standards they consider as impeding and restraining the best and most efficient action for the good of mankind, and the glory of the INTRODUCTION. xiii Redeemer: and while they remain, it is reasonable to think that they will embrace any favourable opportunity to effect such changes in the doctrinal system of the Presbyterian Church, as shall render it more in conformity with their own opinions — unless, indeed, the example of Geneva shall be preferred and followed, where the doctrinal standards, framed under the auspices of Calvin and Beza, have remained un- touched, while all the leading doctrines they embrace are renounced and ridiculed, and their adherents reviled and persecuted. Believing that the doctrines of the Confession of Faith and Catechisms of the Presbyterian Church, are those of the reve- lation of God, most accurately systematized and correctly stated; and consequently that they must be more favourable than any other to the advancement of genuine Christianity, and the eternal salvation of the souls of men; believing also that they admit of a fair and effectual defence, on the princi- ples of sound reason and philosophy, as well as of sacred Scripture; and believing, in fine, that such a defence was loudly called for, when these doctrines were impugned, muti- lated, disparaged, or disfigured, even by writers and speakers who had adopted them solemnly and formally — those who planned the Spruce Street Lectures, determined to solicit from some of their brethren, whose talents and opinions were known to qualify them eminently for such a service, the discussion of certain leading and fundamental points of our doctrinal standards, in a series of Lectures, of which each speaker should deliver one. It is greatly regretted that the -xiv INTRODUCTION. series is less complete than it would have been, if several of the brethren to whom application was made, and all of whom approved the plan proposed, had not found it incom- patible with their health, or with previous engagements, to contribute their aid. But notwithstanding every deficiency, there are still so many cardinal points of doctrinal and practical theology discussed in this volume, and in a manner so clear and im- pressive, that it is confidently believed that every candid and attentive reader will receive sensible benefit from its perusal — the well informed, by the revival in their minds of a distinct view of truths which have long been most precious in their estimation; and those who need instruction and the removal of doubts and difficulties, by finding the infor- mation, explanations and illustrations, which their circum- stances require. The method of communicating instruction and defend- ing truth, by courses of lectures professedly prepared and delivered for the purpose, is well known not to be novel. In the country from which we derive our origin, lectures of this character have long been in use; and in our own coun- try there have been a few instances, in which something of the same kind has heretofore been attempted. That they will hereafter be frequent, is not improbable; as this mode of conveying to the public the opinions and rea- sonings of men of learning, piety and talents, is recom- mended by many considerations. The preparation of a INTRODUCTION. XV single discourse is not onerousj and when but one is de- manded, and its occasion and connexion are considered, it is not likely to be a hasty or careless production; and the concentration of the talents of able men, each discussing an important point in a single lecture, may be expected to prepare for the public volumes of much value. The Lime Street and Bury Street Lectures, contain some of the most able, useful, and pious disquisitions of the English dissent- ing divines. The Spruce Street Lectures accord entirely in doctrine and spirit with those admirable discourses; and without claiming to equal them, it is humbly hoped that the same blessing from the Spirit of grace and truth, which is known to have attended the former, may also be vouchsafed io the latter. SPRUCE STREET LECTURES LECTURE I. Delivered on the Evening of the 2d November, 1831, by the Rev, Ezra Fisk, D.D. of Goshen, N. Y. THE INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. " No man can come unto me, except the Father, which hath gpnt me, draw him." — John vi. 44. It has pleased God to reveal, not only his existence but his personality, in Father, Son, and Holy Ghost. In the glorious economy of redemption, the Father sends the Son, and the Holy Ghost proceeds from both the Father and the Son. The agency of the Holy Spirit is ascribed to both, sometimes to one person and sometimes to the other. When Christ said, *'I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto me," he ascribed the influence of the Spirit to the Son: in my text, he tells us, the Father draws by the same agency. On this fundamental doctrine of the Holy Spirit's official influence, executing the commission of the Father and the Son, rests the propriety of ascribing his agency to either or both. The recognition of this doctrine seemed necessary, to understand definitely the meaning of the exception in 2 10 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. my text. I consider it as referring to the agency of the Holy Ghost, in bringing men to Christ. With this influT ence, men can come and do come to him ; without it, they do not and cannot come. This is the plain and only mean- ing of the passage. With the agency intended in the ex- ception, men are capable of doing all that God requires of them. Leave out the exception, and modify the decla- tion so as to include the agency, it would read thus, "every man can come unto me, if the Father, who hath sent me, draw him." This is a precious and encouraging truth to all who preach the gospel of Christ. The whole economy of grace illustrates this great fact; all Christian experience proves it; and the great day will reveal its glory in the redeemed millions, brought home to Christ in heaven. But leaving out this agency, the whole is reversed — man is only taught his helplessness and made to feel his misery. The declaration in our text, as it fell from the lips of Jesus Christ, expresses an important fact, which should be well understood. Before I proceed to consider the inability asserted, which is the principal object of this discussion, there is an important inquiry to be answered: — What is coming to Christ? I answer the question, and discuss the assertion. I. Tlie question is of great importance, and the illustra- tion of its answer might profitably occupy the whole of this hour. But it admits of a brief solution, which is all that is necessary for my present discussion. Coming to Christ, in these days, is altogether a mental process. In the days of our Saviour'.^ pilgrimage in the flesh, some miglit have understood it otherwise. When he tra- INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 1 1 versed the regions of Palestine, the people flocked to the places of his instruction, and, douhtless, many thoug;ht of nothing else. On the mountain, in the plain, by the sea side, and in the wilderness, he stood before them in tangi- ble human form. Their eyes saw him, and looked on his miracles; their ears heard the gracious words as they pro- ceeded from his lips. But since his bodily presence is withdrawn and enthroned in glory, he is to be approached by us only in mind. Mind alone can now penetrate the heavens, and contemplate the Saviour where the beloved and exiled disciple saw him, exalted in purity and splen- dour, with the rainbow of Jehovah's merciful covenant reflecting his delightful radiance. We recognize, it is true, the grand and glorious principle of his spiritual divine existence, one attribute of which is his omnipresence: and we know, that in reference to this attribute, '^he is not far from every one of us.'' But we speak of a moral approach to Christ, as the Redeemer and Saviour. A brief sketch of this mental process may be comprised in spiritual apprehension, gracious feeling, and holy action. Nothing is more certain than the fact, that the pure, spiritual, holy and gracious character of Jesus Christ, as the only and all-sufficient Saviour, is not apprehended at all, or misapprehended, by men who are ^'far from him." Coming to Christ, must include some apprehension of his character as found in the gospel, of his divine existence and glory, of his holiness and compassion, of his grace and love- liness, and of his suitedness to the case of lost sinners. In this spiritual apprehension is included faith in his offices of prophet, priest and king, in his atoning sacrifice and inter- cession ; at least, so much of faith is included as belongs 12 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. to the exercise of intellect. I am aware that something more than a mere apprehension of character, or accrediting a matter of testimony, is included in that faith which the gospel demands. There is a reliance upon the merits of the Redeemer's sacrifice, an affection of the soul, resting on the loveliness which is spiritually apprehended ; hut in the intellectual exercise there is a spiritual discernment, which the unbeliever has not, and which fallen spirits, who tremble before the majesty of the Son of God, never pos- sess, it is a discernment of the excellence, glory and loveliness of Christ, and an appropriation of his rich and gracious promises to the soul. There may be degrees of clearness and strength in this spiritual apprehension, but Ihe characteristics are essential. They divide its nature, by which, rather than the degree, the estimation is to be made. Gracious affection is an essential part of the mental process, in coming to Christ. Penitence, humility, grati- tude, love, and faith, are connected with that spiritual appre- hension just named. These are feelings of the heart, with- out which there can be no Christian grace. Sorrow for sin, hatred of its intrinsic loathsomeness and opposition to God, humility under a sense of unworthiness, and forsaking the servitude of Satan, are indispensable, in a sinner's approach to Christ. Gratitude for such a Saviour and such a privilege, must be called into exercise in this transaction. But love to Christ is the most direct and important exercise in the process. It is love by which faith works ; in fact, it is an essential part of that faith which relies on the great atoning sacrifice, and unites the soul to Jesus Christ. By holy action, I mean, not only a living exercise of gracious affections, but a subjection of the will to the obe- dience of Christ. 1 mean directing all the faculties of the INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. i3 mind in the service of him <*who gave himself for us, and called us with an holy calling:" I speak now of mental, not external action, profession, or observance of religious duties. These all have their importance in their proper place, but they are the result of coming to Christ, and necessary evi- dences of the fact. The man who spiritually apprehends, trusts, and loves Christ, comes to him, and none others come. All this is often expressed in the gospel by a single comprehensive term, faith, love. Sometimes faith ex- presses the whole transaction; it ^^is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen." Sometimes love is used in the same comprehensive sense — ^^love is the fulfilling of the law." The reasons why these graces are used for the whole process, are very obvious, because faith and love are so prominent and vital in the transaction; and because either of these graces implies the whole. It may, perhaps, be asked, whether the '^coming to Christ," mentioned in the text, intend union to him, or merely an approach, to ask some blessing ? To this, I answer, the former, beyond peradventure. It is coming to him for sal- vation — -into covenant union with him, perpetual in its glo- rious results. But while the text is thus interpreted, the exercise of these graces should be cultivated in all ap- proaches to Jesus Christ. II. The assertion of the text, that without the agency of the Holy Spirit no man can come to Christ, demands care- ful attention. Taking the obvious scriptural interpretation of this coming, and its form may be thus stated: without the Spirit's agency, no man can love Christ, or believe on him. I am aware that this doctrine is denied, and the whole agency of the Holy Ghost rejected. His divine existence is 1 4 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. also denied, and the doctrine is propagated that man needs no aid to his reason, except what instruction he gains from nature and some moral maxims found in what we call reve- lation, to love God and fulfil all the obligations of his being. But this doctrine I need not refute. It necessarily includes a denial of God's plain declarations, and sets aside the whole gospel of Christ. Few in this land, it is to be hoped, have the hardihood unequivocally to espouse an opinion so di- rectly in the face of divine revelation. But there is much speculation on the inability intended in this declaration of Jesus Christ; and there is certainly great importance attached to the inquiry into its meaning. The importance, however, arises not so much from any inherent difficulty in the investigation, or any liability of an honest mind to err, in the interpretation of the text, or in its practical application, but from the multiplied speculations and bad philosophy of the age. It is undeniably true that no man ever did come to Christ without the agency of the Holy Spirit; no believer of the gospel can suppose that any man ever will come without it ; and the Saviour asserted that none can come, except by this agency. What more is necessary then, to admit that the inability is entire, a complete preventive? Apart from the meddlesome philosophy which has in- truded its blindness to obscure the light, I perceive only one reason for pursuing the inquiry another step. That is, to show the consistency of this announcement with God's commands, which bind us to love him and believe on Christ. On this subject, the facts, as stated in the Scriptures, are entirely satisfactory to my mind. There can be no doubt that God's commands are peremptory and binding ofi all individuals of the human famil}^, to whom the word of his INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 15 revelation is sent. Nor can there be any doubt that men are unable to come without the agency of the Holy Ghost. Here are two facts, revealed with equal plainness, and each positively asserted. Are they consistent with each other? This is the question. If they are not, there is inconsistency and inequality with God, because he has asserted both, and applied them to the same persons. We come, therefore, to this examination, with the assurance of their entire con- sistency in fact; and if ive cannot perceive it, we may be certain the defect is in us, and not in the divine administra- tion. It is a case in which we are not at liberty to hold to one and reject the other. Both are facts, and must be consistent. Whether such commands would have been given to us if there had been no mission of the Holy Spirit, perliaps we are not competent to say; but we know that they are not given without it. I speak not now of the providential agency which God exercises over and in his creatures, but of that mission of the Spirit whose object is, by an unseen influence, to ^^ reprove the world of sin, and of righteous- ness, and of judgment," to take of the things of Christ, and show them unto his people. This influence constitutes an essential part of God's administration, and he is ever ready to "give the Holy Spirit to them that ask him." The character and effect of this inability to come to Christ, is a proper subject of inquiry, and should, in these days, be well understood. The subject embraces much, and can only receive a brief examination at this time. Here let me say, that the circumstances under which I address you, and the occasion, together with the false phi- losophy so often mingled in the discussion of this subject, must be my apology for detaining you with a philosophical 16 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. investigation. Some apology seems necessary, for I have not forgotten the Apostle Paul's caution to " avoid opposi- tions of science falsely so called." But since this subject has been so involved, I may be permitted to recollect ano- ther caution by the same Apostle: "beware, lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit." I hope to regard these cautions, and show how philosophy has obscur- ed this subject. The terms which indicate power, are used more vaguely and more variously than almost any others in the English language. The reason is obvious. We know not what is power. No man has ever defined it. We know how we get the idea, but the thing itself is beyond our cognizance. We perceive the relation between cause and efiect, and call that power which constitutes this relation. What it is, we do not know, and it is useless to attempt its definition. But if we take that relation which suggests the idea of power, in the place of its definition, we shall not err in any of its important applications or uses. The relation between voli- tion and the efiect which follows, may be used for a defini- tion of man's power. Yet the will is not power, nor is volition ability, nor is the effect power, nor is it true that the connexion is ability; but that on which the connexion rests is precisely what we call power. Nothing else can be properly so called, which belongs to man. Now if we substitute this connexion for that which constitutes it, I can see no error in any of its applications in argument or illustration. Perhaps some may be disposed to ask here, why I would substitute any definition for ability, which, in itself, is unde- finable? I answer, because it is desirable to divest it of the perplexity and vagueness to which usage and speculation INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 17 have subjected the term. This is reason sufficient. To illustrate my meaning, take the case before us, coming to Christ. Is there a connexion between volition and spi- ritual discernment — between volition and love — or be- tween volition and the appropriate holy exercise of all the mind's faculties? If there be such a connexion as between cause and effect, a dependence of this discernment and love x on volition, then, certainly, men have the power of coming to Christ, without the agency of the Holy Ghost; and there is no addition of ability in the conferring of divine grace. If there be no such connexion, men have not the power. But here it will be said by some, that this description of ability is of that which is physical or natural. Be it so; it is asserted by many that men have natural power, but lack moral ability, to obey the command — *^come to Christ." What is moral ability? Is it not that which connects moral * 4 effects with volition? Is volition a moral act? — whether it is so or not, love to God is a moral act. And if the latter be the effect of the former, that which so connects them is moral power. Call it physical, natural, or moral — let it be remembered — it is all the same; that which connects the event with volition, is ability, and nothing else can be pro- perly so called. I know there are other notions of power, which will presently be examined; but let not this view be yet forgotten. Now, if men have this ability of any kind — I care not what it may be called — without the draw- ing of the Father, to come to Christ, or to love God, it must have been ascertained by the fact having, at some time, taken place. No other evidence can be admissible, in opposition to the positive declarations of Jesus Christ. Show me such a fact, and I will admit the ability in that case. But such a fact has never occurred, and is utterly impossible. 8 18 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. If Christ had said, it is impossible for any man to come unto me, except the Father who hath sent me draw him, it would not have varied the meaning of the text. What, then, becomes of the distinction between natural and Tworflr/ ability and inability? It is set aside as useless, so far as its application to this case is concerned. Ability always indicates a connexion between cause and effect; and if I have not greatly mistaken the meaning of those who contend for man's natural ability to love God, they consider it as something which is connected with volition, or that belongs to the will . They represent the whole process of coming to Christ as depending on a man's choree ; and this is because men have natural powder to come, if they choose. — Whenever they choose to exert that power, they come. All that is necessary, therefore, is, that they should be induced to choose to love God, and then they will actually love him. Now if all this were true, it would indeed be a fact, that men have natural power to love God. But is it so? Let us examine the case. The volition does not govern the understanding. It does not depend upon a man's will whether he discern spiritual things, or whether his intellect possess spiritual illumination. I think the mere statement of this fact, is sufficient. ^'The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they arc foolishness unto him; neither can he know them, be- cause they are spiritually discerned." The volition moreover does not govern the heart. It does not depend upon a man's will, whether he love God or hate him; ** because the carnal mind is enmity against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be." The truth is, by an irreversible law of mental ope- rntion.-:, the will is govci'ne 1 by the affeclions, and they INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 19 must be changed, before there can be any love to God. If it were so tliat the affections followed and depended on voli- tion, every sinner, alarmed at the prospect of the everlast- ing wrath which awaits him, and accrediting the fact that love to Christ would deliver him from going down to the pit, would certainly love him. On this supposition, there could be no danger of self-deception; no need of so much anxiety among Christians to know their state; no need of a warfare with the lusts of the flesh; no danger of being brought into captivity to the law of sin which is in their members. It cannot be true, that the will governs the affections. I can just as easily conceive that a man's volitions may govern his appetite for food, as his taste for moral truth. A sick man might as well transform, by the influence of volition, his aversion to a medicine which he chooses to take, as the sinner change, by the same influence, his aversion to holi- ness: — both are impossible. If natural ability, therefore, be indicated by a connexion between volition, or will, as the cause, and loving God as the effect, men have not natural power to love God. But some use the phrase natural ability, to indicate merely the possession of faculties, which, rightly employed, do love God, and perform Christian duty. That men have faculties which constitute them free, moral, and responsi- ble agents, is true, and of great importance to be recollected. As I am not disposed to contend for words, I will examine this meaning of ability. The understanding perceives; it is proper, therefore, in this sense, to say, that it, or man, has ability to perceive. But has it the ability of spiritual discernment, without divine illumination? Certainly not. The heart loves; in the same sense it is proper to say, the heart has ability to love. But has it ability to love holi- 20 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. ness? Nay, it is enmity against God, and cannot be sub- ject to the law of God, which enjoins holy love. The will chooses; it, therefore, has ability to choose. But here are two questions to be answered — has the will ability to choose independently ? — and can the choice control the affections of the heart? To the first question, I answer, that man's will has no self-determining power, but is always governed by the pleasure of the heart; that is, by the prevailing affection. This is a principle so well settled in mental philosophy, that I consider it unnecessary, at this time, to investigate the proof. Although the will cannot act independently, it may choose subordinately, and ultimately. The ultimate choice always terminates on the object most agreeable to the heart. A subordinate choice terminates on some object, not always for its own sake, or because it is in itself agreeable, but for the sake of something with which it is connected that is agreeable. Now, I conceive that an awakened sinner may have such a sense of his danger, and be so fully convinced that away from the Saviour he must perish, that he may really choose to come to Christ for the sake of escaping hell; not because he discerns any beauty in Christ, or has any love to him. He may choose subordinately, as the sick man chooses medicine, for the sake of his health. This is not only conceivable, but is matter of frequent occurrence. It is, obviously, the usual course with sinners, when they begin to seek the Lord. You cannot convince them that they do not choose to come to Christ; you may convince them that their choice is of no avail while the heart does not love him; but their own consciousness of choice is paramount to all argument. Tell them that it INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 21 depends on their choice, and that if they chose to come, they certainly would do it; they will say, as in such cases many have said, it seems to us we do choose to come, but we know that we have not come; and we suppose therefore we do not choose it, because those who have a right to know tell us it depends on our choice. Such is generally the case with not a few, who are taught to believe that coming to Christ depends on their own will. Man's own consciousness, in such a case, is more likely to accord with fact, than are the inferences from speculative theories. If the will can thus choose subordinately, the second question — can the choice control the affection? — is easily '^ answered in the negative. It is perfectly evident that the highest affection is placed on the ultimate object, which, in the case just now mentioned, is safety from impending wrath; coming to Christ is, therefore, chosen subordinately, and has no tendency to change the affection. It should here be observed, that the Spirit of God often convinces men of their sin and danger, and the necessity of loving Christ, long before they do love him. With these thoughts distinctly before his mind, the awakened sinner tries the process of subjecting his heart to his will, for days, or even weeks, before he learns that he must despair of accomplish- ^ ing the object, and must rely on the Spirit's influence. The more he tries to love God in this way, the more hard his heart seems, and the farther he goes from the object which he seeks. The truth must be realized, ^*it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy." Let me here state, briefly, the doctrine of the will's government and freedom, in accordance, as I conceive, with the Scriptures and with fact. The will always obeys the *Z2 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. pleasure of the heart, and in this consists both its govern- ment and freedom. To present the whole operation in its philosophical form, it is thus — the heart, or faculty which feels, is the spring or source of action — the ultimate object is the excitement to action — and pleasure is the motive which the will always obeys. Thus, the choice of the will is entirely governed by the pleasure of the heart; and this is the highest kind of freedom conceivable. Can the will be more free than to choose as is most. agreeable? Can any man desire any other liberty of will than to choose just as he pleases? If he had liberty to choose what is disagreea- ble, he never would use it. Such choosing could not be freedom, except in cases already referred to, where disa- greeable objects are chosen subordinately for the sake of the ultimate, which is always agreeable. We have heard of a dogma which teaches, that men may choose to be damned for the glory of God, from which, although it be most lovely in itself, they expect no enjoy- ment, nor to see any loveliness. This, verily, looks like another kind of freedom — choosing without any motive except pain. But this figment of the last century is gene- rally laid aside, and disowned by those who are willing to bear the name of its author. It is well that so monstrous an absurdity should die; and it would be still better, if the two remaining absurdities, which constituted the peculiari- ties of the system to which it belonged, were as generally exploded. One of these dogmas I have occasion to examine in a single aspect, viz. that all holiness and sin consist, exclusively, in free voluntary exercises. The other, which is, God's ejficiency in producing sin, although it belongs to the same philosophical speculation, falls not immediately within the range of my subject. INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 23 Since, according to this dogma, all holiness and sin con- sist exclusively in voluntary exercise, all the moral excel- lence included in coming to Christ is volition only: and since the will is not governed by any good or evil principle, it is just as easy to choose right as wrong; -men, therefore, ^ have as much power to love God as to hate him. It is furthermore inferred, that regeneration is only a new and right choice, which all men are naturally able to exercise. This, I believe, is a fair representation of the doctrine. Now, if thi^ were true, I would think it a waste of time and breath to pray for the Holy Spirit's influence to renew and sanctify men. But is it true ? I admit that volitions are sinful; but I maintain that feelings are sinful, and that the principle or propensity from which they proceed is also sinful. ^*Out of the heart (not volition) proceed evil thoughts." I am aware, however, that some use, though inaccurately, voluntary exercises to include all the feelings of the heart. On that principle, I ask, what feels — what chooses — has it no character? I ask for the appositeness of many of our Lord's parables, such as of the tree, leaven, and mustard seed. What connects the exercises with the man? What is punishable? But I cannot pursue the many absurdities to which the principle leads. The way is now prepared to examine the real character of that inability which keeps the sinner away from Christ. It is sin. It is not want of faculties, which are capable, j under the Holy Spirit's influence, of all that is implied in , coming to Christ, but without that influence, men cannot so \ employ them. The inability is recognized in three aspects — blindness of the understanding — hardness of the heart — and perversion of the will. These qualities are again expressed, by ignorance, deadness, and obstinacy. Is it 24 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. right to call this sin, moral inability? Or shall it be called natural inability? The truth is, the whole use of this dis- tinctive phraseology is out of place, and worse than useless, in the explanation of this subject. Men are depraved in the heart, that seat of the affection and source of action; and this is evinced by blindness and perverseness. However we may describe this depravity, and whatever we may call it, this is the only impediment in the way of sinners coming to Christ. In order that any man should love God, repent of sin, believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, or what includes them all, come to Christ, his heart must be regenerated. There must be a new propensity or preparation of heart to love holiness and hate sin, and the understanding must be enlightened to discern the spiritual excellence and loveli- ness of Christ. The impenitent man has neither of these; and without them, coming to Christ is impossible. Should it here be said that the development and propensity is com- ing to Christ, and that the inquiry respects the fact, whe- ther he has or has not the ability for their production and exercise; and what is the nature of that ability or inability — I answer in several particulars. It is admitted on all hands, that the impenitent sinner has not this discernment or pro- pensity ; he cannot, therefore, develope what he has not. That he has not power to enlighten his own understanding, or to originate a propensity to love holiness, I have already shown. As to the character of that inability, I have already said it consists in a principle of sin, affecting all the mental faculties, and having its primary seat in the heart. Now, what the nature of that inability is which ren- ders man incapable of regenerating his own heart — for the whole inquiry may concentrate here — it matters very little INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 25 to define. Let us examine more carefully the philosophi- cal definitions of the day. If we call \i physical, it is phi- losophically true; but is an improper use of the term, therefore calculated to mislead. Physical ability, though ever so great, could not produce the moral change called regeneration. If a sinner had ten times as much physical power as a fallen angel, it would be just as impossible as it is now for him to renew his heart. Physical power never originates moral results in responsible agents. All their physical ability is employed for physical purposes, except as it is used instrumentally, by the governing principle of the heart. The principle which moves and controls all physical action, is to be the subject of change. It cannot be changed by that which only acts under its direction and control. Thus, the truth of the assertion is evident; but such are the associations and uses of the term physical, Xhdl it is improper to employ it here, and is calculated to mis- lead. The more common and familiar uses of the phrase- ology, connects it with volition and external action. Thus, a man chooses to walk, and the efiect follows; but his limbs become palsied, and then he is physically unable to walk. A child cannot perform the operations of a man. But illustrations need not be multiplied; they are familiar to all. Such want of power is evidently excusable; and from - this fixed and warrantable use of the phrase, if we say sin- ners are physically unable to love God, it is liable to mis- lead them to the inference that they are excusable. If , we call any thing else, except that which connects the ( effect with volition, physical power, it makes confusion, ) and obscures the subject to which it is applied. If we call it natural inability, the terms are liable to a similar abuse. It is nevertheless true, that man's inability 4 26 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. is by nature, because it is his depravity which the Scrip- tures represent to be natural to him. But if we use natural^ in distinction from moral, it means the same as physical, and ought not to be employed in theological dis- cussions of this kind. If, however, natural inability mean a want of the requisite faculties to constitute man a respon- sible agent, it is not true that men are naturally unable to love God. They do possess all the requisite faculties; but very few men have so disciplined their minds to technical distinctions and theorising, as to carry along with the terms and their use this meaning. It ought not, for these reasons, to be used. In its technical and differently ex- plained meanings, it is true, or it is false; but in its common appropriate meaning and use, it is altogether inapplicable to this case. Now, if we say it is moral inability, the terms are quite as objectionable as the former. If I understand the term m,oral, it indicates something which is either holy or sin- ful, right or wrong. The inquiry should, therefore, be made in this place, what belongs to man of a moral nature, and why is it moral? Any thing which belongs to. man, that is either sinful or holy, is moral, and nothing else, whether it be faculty, principle, or conduct. I would say the primary seat and source of all that is moral belonging to man, is in his heart. What, then, is moral power to love God? Several answers arc given to this inquiry, besides the one which I have before given. Take one that some use, it is a heart prepared to love God and holi- ness; sinners have not this. But take another meaning, the possession of a faculty or faculties which are moral; and sinners surely have moral power to love God. I am unable to perceive why it is not just as proper to say that they INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. «>7 have moral, as natural ability, to change their hearts. It is said, in one case, if men have not natural faculties or power, they cannot be obliged to keep God's law — so it may, with equal propriety, be said, if men have not a moral faculty or power, they cannot be obliged to obey the moral statute. But I am aware, that moral ability is often under- stood to mean willingness; and great wisdom is affected in using the distinctive terms in question. On this supposi- tion, I ask, why that, which, in the estimation of those who use the distinction, is considered the essence of obe- dience, should be called power of any kind, and in any sense? No good reason can be given. The truth seems to me, that those men who use the distinction of natural and moral in explaining the inability of sinners, are deceived, by transferring an association which belongs to external actions, and is true where it belongs, to mental affections, where it is not true; a transfer which will, therefore, always mislead. It will now be asked, how can a sinner be blamed for not loving God? The answer to this question, will lead to a more definite view of the inability under discussion. Men are to blame for nothing except sin, and for that always. Now, whether sin be in action or principle, in the temper of the heart or in volition, it is the object of God's displeasure, and for it men are criminal. It is a specimen of the bad philosophy which is becoming prevalent in this age, that no being can act wrong unless he has ability to do right; and none can act right, unless he has ability to do wrong; all this is applied to mental operations as w^ell as to external actions. But is not God always right and good, although he cannot err? Is not Satan sinful and blameable, although he cannot love holiness? Certainly. But if this principle may not 28 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. be applied to men, will not the guilt of the damned be greatly diminished, the moment they are placed beyond the impassable gulf? Are those of whom the prophet speaks, less criminal than others, because their habits of sin are as difficult to change as the Ethiopian's skin, and fixed as the leopard's spot ? Are those comparatively innocent of whom the Apostle declares, '^ it is impossible to renew them again to repentance?" The true account of the case is, the source of all human agency and ability is sinful, and must be changed by divine grace, or God will forever hate it, and punish men for its character and agency. Is it asked, how man can be blamed for sin, if he has not power to change that principle from which all his criminal agency proceeds? If I understand this question, it is precisely of the character of one pro- posed to Paul, *^why doth he [God] yet find fault? for who hath resisted his will?" Although connected w4th the subject in a different aspect, it is the same inquiry. I might give the Apostle's rebuke with great propriety, "nay, but, man, who art thou that repliest against God?" Here it would be proper to leave the inquiry, were it not that modern philosophy laughs at all authority, though it be divine, by which a question is settled without explana- tion. Let it be remembered then, that it is not the province of philosophy to explain how God's law reaches the heart and binds, but every man's conscience can testify the fact, and reproach him for his malice. If the question be, how man became thus sinful? let those who ask it, read the history of man's fall, in the third chapter of the book of Genesis, and Paul's account of the covenant relation and imputation, in his epistles to the Romans and Corinthians, for a solution of this question; and there we leave the inquirers. INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 29 Take another method of solving the difficulty. God has constituted his own perfections, which are holy, the stand- ard of right and moral obligation. Every intelligent, free, responsible agent, tried by this standard, and found opposed to it, is an enemy of God. The rule shows him to be such, no matter what his power. His power is not estimated by this standard, but simply his moral character. Ability is not the basis or measure of responsibility in this case, but the faculties which constitute man a free, moral agent. I repeat again, to prevent all mistake, that I am now speak- ing of obligation to love God, not of external actions, where physical or natural power is employed, and for which a man is responsible, according to that which he has, and not according to that he has not. Man does not love God with his physical ability. He is responsible to God for the exercise of all his faculties; if they are wrongly employed, it proves the source of action is wrong; and the more depraved is that source of human agency, the worse is the character — the more criminal. I recur now to the question, whether this doctrine is con- sistent with God's commands — or, in more explicit terms, has God a right to command men to love him, if they have not the ability to obey? I answer yes, most undoubtedly. .^ Be it remembered that this refers not to external conduct, where physical power is employed, and concerning which it would not be true. A man who has no hand or foot cannot be rightfully commanded to use them. An idiot cannot be rightfully ordered to solve a mathematical pro- blem, or an infant to calculate an eclipse. But what has all such ability to do with loving God? I speak now of God's command over the heart, and man's inability by nature to turn the atfections to God. Let me here repeat, that 30 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. God does command men to love him, and at the same time says they cannot love him. Moreover it is right; because the only impediment in the way of their obedience is that sinful principle, which God condemns, and for which he will punish men. This fact and this reason of the righte- ousness in the command, show the character of the inability to be sin. Further we need not speculate. The great question now recurs, what saith the Holy Ghost? After all the speculations on this subject, to ex- plain its philosophy, the simple and very plain language of the Holy Scriptures is incomparably more satisfactory than all that philosophy ever can teach. Love to God is a fruit of the Spirit, so are all the Christian graces. ^^The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, long suffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, meekness, temperance." Salvation is all of grace, in its plan, developement and completion, '^not of works — for we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works." Regeneration is by the agency of the Holy Spirit — ^^according to his mercy he saved us, by the washing of regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost — bora not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God — born from above — trans- formed by renewing of the mind." Christians are thus challenged — <^who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive?" Christ said to his disciples, '^without me ye can do nothing." Said the Apostle, *'not that we are sufficient of ourselves to think any thing as of ourselves; but our sufficiency is of God." What language, plain or figurative, could more explicitly declare man's inability without the Holy Spirit, than the Scriptures use again and again? It is twice stated in the chapter of my text — Elsewhere sinners are repre- SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. 31 sented as "alienated from the life of God" — having a ^* car- nal mind," which -^is enmity against God, for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be" — under the power of Satan — and of sin — dead in trespasses and sins — their hearts fully set in them to do evil." Man's deliverance from this spiritual death and servitude to sin and Satan, ^'is not of hijn that willeth nor of him that runneth, but of God that showeth mercy." But quotations need not be further continued. Take all those very numer- ous passages of Scripture which ascribe to the Holy Spirit, as his fruits, the graces of piety — all those which ascribe regeneration to the same agency — all those which represent this change as a new creation — all those which represent the character and state of fallen men as dead in sin, under its dominion, lost, blind, enemies to God and helpless — all those prophecies, in which the figures of dry bones, steril- ity and the curse, are found — all those records of history, which describe the progress of the gospel and the conver- sion of men to God — and all those supplications, directions, facts, and promises, which indicate a reliance on Christ and the Holy Spirit for sanctification and salvation : then tell me if there can remain a doubt of man's inability and crime. What now are the uses to be made of this doctrine? One very important use is to humble man before God. If men are so sinful that they cannot deliver themselves, either from its curse or from its dominion, they have reason to be humble. They have reason to be humbled under a sense of their sinfulness and their impotence. There are few things of which men are more inclined to be proud than of power. Children early discover a disposition to glory in their strength, or their capacity to accomplish what they 32 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. consider important. Men are naturally fond of power in all its relations and influence, and are prone to become vain in their imaginations, forgetting their sin and weakness before God. But when once they are taught this doctrine by the Holy Spirit, they are prostrated in the dust, and feel themselves at the disposal of sovereign mercy. The pride of man needs to be humbled for .his own benefit ; and God will have sinners humbled, that his own power may be manifested in them. "Whoso exalteth himself shall be abased." Another use of the doctrine is to convince men of sin. So long as sinners perceive no danger, and feel confident in their ability to turn themselves to God at any time, they will not listen to the invitations of mercy, or care for the representations of their danger. No sinner will be likely to feel much anxiety for the salvation of his soul, while he considers it as depending on his own choice or ability. There is no truth, which the Holy Ghost more frequently and efficiently uses, to convince men of their sin and dan- ger, than their lost, helpless condition by nature. The publican felt this when he cried, "God be merciful to me a sinner. '^ So fully does the Spirit convince men of their helplessness, when he draws them to Christ, that their cry is, ^^Lord save, or we perish;" and ever after they live and walk by faith, looking to Christ, in whom is their strength, and depending on the Holy Spirit for guidance. The Spirit often teaches sinners their danger before he teaches them their helplessness ; they look more at the sin of their conduct than the sin of their hearts. In such cases they commence an effort to make themselves better. They try expedient after expedient, confident that they can turn themselves to God. But under the teaching of the Spirit INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 33 they learn that they make themselves worse instead of bet- ter. Let a sinner perceive that he deserves endless misery and is in imminent dangor of his soul — if he has, or think he has power, he will make exertion for his safety. But let him perceive that he is ready to sink into everlasting perdi- tion, and feel that his sin renders him helpless, an agony of distress will fill his soul; and if Christ had not sent the Holy Spirit, despair would drink up his own spirit. Then he trusts in Christ, and is thus drawn by the blessed agency of the Holy Ghost. But here it may possibly be asked, if this doctrine be not calculated to discourage sinners from seeking the Lord ? I suppose it is possible for cavillers to pervert the truth, and even wrest it to their own destruction; but that it is calcu- lated to discourage men from trusting in Christ and accept- ing salvation, as it is freely offered to them, I cannot admit. I know that some have said the doctrine is calculated to lead men to sit down quietly and wait God's time to save them, alleging, that if he do not save them, the fault will be in the Saviour, and not in themselves. This cavil never came from a sinner, deeply anxious for his soul's salvation. But if the objection were founded in fact, the influence would not be to quiet the feelings. Suppose a case, which, I think, may illustrate the influence of the sentiments in- tended in the objection. Were it announced to us, that the flames are encroaching upon this house, and that if we re- main in it a few moments longer we must inevitably be consumed, and that we are unable to get out of the house : would we lie down and sleep ? No, every bosom would be filled with wakeful agony. But to make the case some- what parallel to the real situation of the simler, we must suppose two things more — that our sinfulness alone disables 5 34 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. us from escaping, and that God is entreating us to accept his efficient and certain relief. Then if we should perish in the flame to night, would there not be crime as well as helplessness in our case? Would there not be a striking analogy in the feeling, likely to be excited in such a case, to the conviction of sinners taught of God? To my mind the analogy is easily traced. 2 , It is again objected that this doctrine sets aside the use of means with impenitent sinners. To this I reply, in un- qualified terms, that exactly the reverse is true. If the excellency of the power were of men, every thing would be confused, uncertain, and discouraging. But since it is of God, and not of men, we may hope for success, relying on his ability, which is constant and efficient to connect the means with the end. This is too plain to need further illustration. It is further objected, that it is inconsistent and useless to exhort sinners to repent or perform any Christian duty, if this doctrine be true. I know it sounds very singular to some ears to hear such addresses to sinners as **look ye blind — hear ye deaf — awake thou that sleepest and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light." I doubt not many think such exhortations useless. But so it is, men are thus described and thus exhorted in the gospel of Christ ; and who will undertake to say they are inconsis- tent? God has ordered us in the gospel commission to announce most distinctly^ the guilt, helplessness, and misery of sinners; and at the same time to exhort, entreat, and command them to repent. Our warrant is plain, and our prospect of success, in these announcements, rests on the mission of the Holy Spirit. When the voice of the Spirit accompanies the exhortation, sinners hear and come to INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 35 Christ. I have already shown the consistency of the doc- trine with God's commands, and this rests on the same principle. But I must not longer dwell on this topic : let me say once for all, the human heart and human ingenuity have employed their utmost efforts to multiply and propa- gate objections and cavils against this doctrine. Here let a very strong fact be distinctly marked— one fixed and intel- ligent look within, upon the character of the heart as dis- closed by the light and teaching of the Holy Ghost, dis- arms every objection, and prostrates the sinner in deep self-abasement, and covers him with shame, crying, ^^wo is me, for I am undone." No cavil or objection can stand before a conscience enlightened by the Spirit of God. A very important use of this doctrine is to lead Chris- tians and ministers of the gospel to cultivate a sense of dependence on the special influence of the Holy Spirit, and pray for his agency. No matter how great man's physical power may be considered by others. Christians must feel their entire dependence on the Spirit's blessed agency, which alone can bring men to Christ, enlighten their minds and sanctify them for his service and glory. The more sensible men are of their helplessness and real necessity, the more they will pray for the grace of God. The doc- trine tends to induce .in Christians a more constant sense of responsibility under the gospel administration, where the Holy Ghost is sent to humble, enlighten, sanctify, and guide them in the knowledge of his will, and discharge of Christian duty. Dependence on the Spirit and responsi- bility go together. The whole gospel urges upon us this sense of dependence on the Holy Ghost. He takes of the things of Christ, and shows them unto us ; and we cannot be too thoroughly impressed with the importance of relying 36 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. on this influence. Christians do not pray enough for this blessed agency; and too often they attempt the perform- ance of duty with little or no sense of their dependence. This explains their frequent failure and the meagreness of their graces. While Paul recognized, fully, the truth of Christ's declaration, "without me ye can do nothing," his humble and confident reliance on the influence of the Holy Ghost, enabled him to say, "I can do all things through Christ, who strengthens me." It is not a sense of inability, which prevents Christians from growing in grace and ful- filling their obligations, but leaning upon their own under- standing, and relying on their own strength. Under the influence of this sentiment of dependence, and a view of the helpless condition of sinners, ministers of the gospel will be more likely to rely on the Spirit's influence, and pray for his agency to accompany their ministrations. They will keep the doctrine of the Holy Spirit's agency distinctly in their own and the view of others. It was a judicious remark of a sensible elder in the Church, "if ministers of the gospel would honour the Holy Ghost more in their preaching, the Holy Ghost would honour them." One direct object of preaching the gospel is, to convince men of sin — of their lost, disabled, perilous condition under its influence — of the direct and certain consequence of sin, everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of his power. Another important object is, to convince or teach them of the righteousness, not only of the law which condemns thorn, but of Clirist, by which alone they can be justified — to explain the scheme of salva- tion by Christ, and the principles of the administration INABILITY OF SINNERS CONSIDERED. 37 under which they are planned. This is to be done, " not in the words which man's wisdom teaches, but which the Holy Ghost teaches.'' how necessary that ministers of Christ should be deeply impressed with the sense of their dependence on this heavenly instruction and influence! They should go from their closet to the pulpit, to the family, and every parochial service. They should carry the case of sinners before the mercy seat, unite the convic- tion and conversion of their souls to the intercession of Jesus Christ, which alone can prevail, to send down the answer of peace. One important practical question must close this pro- tracted discussion. I propose it to every individual in this assembly. Is the agency of the Holy Spirit drawing you? If you feel inclined to seek the Lord, be sure the Spirit is striving with you. That some such inclinations are awakened here, I doubt not. Be cautious that you resist not the Holy Ghost. Recollect that you live under an administratioii in which this is the last agency employed for your salvation; resist this, and you must perish forever. Recollect that you live in a time greatly distinguished for the outpouring of this blessed influence. You take upon yourselves a fearful responsibility, if you resist the gracious influence. You may, for aught I know, have come very near to that point, when it shall be said of you as of Ephraim, "let him alone." How tremendous the pros- pect! How urgently should this caution be pressed upon your excited attention ! And ye careless ones, remember that your carelessness costs you no small efforts to resist the Holy Spirit; and wo be to you, when you shall have succeeded effectually in quenching the Spirit. ,.- > 38 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. Christian brethren! take heed that you grieve not the Holy Spirit of promise. Cherish his influence; live under his guidance; pray for his agency to convince and convert perishing sinners. May the Lord hear, answer, forgive bless, and save us all in Christ Jesus. Amen. SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. LECTURE II Delivered on the Evening of the 27th November, 1831, by the Rev. Jacob J. Janeway, D. D. of New Yorlc, THE FALL OF MAN AND ITS EFFECTS. Rom. v. 12. "Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned." The subject assigned for discussion this evening, is, " the fall of man and its effects.^^ The passage just read will bring both parts of the subject distinctly to view. The inspired writer's chief design in this epistle is, to illustrate and establish that fundamental article of our holy- religion, justification by faith in our Lord Jesus Christ. The necessity of this free and gracious method of justifica- tion, is founded on the sinful and guilty state of the human race. Having proved all mankind, Jews as well as Gen- tiles, to be in such a state, and under the curse of God's violated law, the Apostle deduces from his premises, this incontrovertible conclusion: "Therefore, by the deeds of the law, there shall no flesh be justified in his sight; for by 6 42 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. the law is the knowledge of sin.''* He then proceeds immediately to exhibit the plan of infinite wisdom for delivering us from our fallen and helpless condition; show- ing how believers are ^^justified freely" by divine *^ grace, through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus;" or, in other words, ^^how God imputeth righteousness without works — to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, "t To remove the prejudices of the Jews, and to reconcile them to the truth, he evinces that Abraham, their illus- trious father, in whom they gloried, was justified, or jnade righteous, in this way; that he was thus justified while uncircumcised; that circumcision was designed for the purpose, not of introducing a new method of justification, but of confirming that by faith, and transmitting this inesti- mable blessing to every believer, whether Jew or Gentile, throught he operation of that gracious covenant, in which Abraham was constituted father of the faithful, under Christian as well as under the Jewish dispensation. J Pursuing his design, the Apostle begins in the text the parallel he runs between Christ and Adam; and by show- ing that as all mankind fell, by the offence of their common progenitor, into a state of sin, guilt, and condemnation, so all who believe are restored, by the obedience of Christ, to a state of righteousness, peace, and acceptance with God; and then he establishes the adaptation of this gracious plan to the case of all men; and, consequently, proves the Jews to need its relief as really as the uncircumcised Gentiles. The text contemplates the fall of the first man, and the fall of his posterity. Both parts of our subject are included * Rom. iii, 20. t Rom. iv. 5, 6. \ Rom. iv. 9, 17. THE FALL OF MAN AND ITS EFFECTS. 43 in its terms, and to both I invite your serious and unpreju- diced attention. I. The fall of the first man. Adam, it is well known, was created in a holy and happy state. As his body was brought into existence in a mature condition, capable of performing all the operations of a full grown man; so his soul was created in a corres- ponding state of maturity, with all its noble faculties fully developed, and fitted for all the diversified acts of intellect, volition, and affection. The knowledge he displayed of the marriage relation, the facility with which he imposed appropriate names on all the animals brought to him for the purpose, and the intelligent intercourse he enjoyed with his Creator, furnish clear proofs of his having been created in a state of mental maturity. Besides, we are distinctly informed by the sacred histo- rian, that Adam was created "in the image of God, after his likeness'y'^^ and by an inspired Apostle, we are taught that the image of God denotes especially knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness, t "Lo, this only have I found, that God made man (Adam) upright; but they have sought out many inventions. J That our first parent possessed as distinct a knowledge of God, of himself, of his relations, and of his duties, as his state of probation required, is clear. His heart was as pure as his mind was enlightened. The volitions of his holy will accorded entirely with the dictates of his perfect judgment. He loved his Creator as fervently as duty demanded; and he was fully inclined to render all the acts » Gen. i. 26, 27. tCol. iii. 10. Eph. iv. 24. t Eccles. vii. 29. .0^ 44 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. of homage and obedience prescribed by the law. In a word, he was entirely free from every moral defect, and was what his Maker required him to be. Created in this state of intelligence, purity, and holiness, Adam was perfectly happy, enjoying not only the plea- sures of that delightful garden in which he was placed, and intercourse with that rational and unequalled female com- panion whom the bounty of his Creator had given him; but also, and chiefly, the smiles and communion of his Maker. In his garden he walked, the admiration of angels and the envy of devils, lord of this, and heir to a better world. With this highly gifted creature, the Most High conde- scended to enter into a covenant, in which life was pro- mised as the reward of obedience, and death threatened as the penalty of disobedience. It is worthy of remark, that in every age, God has regulated his dealings with men by covenant engagements. He established a covenant with Noah and his descendants; with Abraham and his seed; with David and his offspring; with Phineas and his chil- dren; and ought any to be surprised, when it is affirmed that God made a covenant with the parent of our race? In the brief history given of him by Moses, we discern all that belongs to a covenant; the parties, the stipulations, the promise, the threatening, the seal, and the assent. And when it is recollected, that a covenant was established with Christ, the head of the new creation, the second Adam, can it be doubted that a covenant was established with him who was his type, the head of the old creation, the first Adam? Reproving his ancient people, the Lord says, by his prophet Hosea, ''They, like men," [Jidam THE FALL OF MAN AND ITS EFFECTS. 45 in the original) "they, like Jldajn, have transgressed the covenant."* This covenant was not only just and equitable, but also gracious. Adam was endowed with ample powers to perform its condition, and thus secure the promised reward. By the positive precept annexed to the moral law, his obedience seems to have been so concentrated to one point, that here alone danger of failing was to be appre- hended; and had he duly guarded himself in this quarter, he would probably have been safe in every other point. Besides, his trial, which, without this covenant arrange- ment, would have been indefinitely extended as to time, was reduced to a very brief term, that would not probably have lasted longer than the fruit he was forbidden to eat. But this noble creature, adorned as he was with the moral image of God, honoured with his smiles and com- munion, and aspiring after a higher state of being, fell from that holy and happy condition, in which he had been placed by the munificence of his Creator. The circum- stances of this most deplorable apostacy are briefly stated by the inspired penman. Through the agency of Eve, whom, when alone, he had previously and successfully tempted, Satan, the great enemy both of God and man, prevailed with our common parent to violate the covenant made with him, by eating the forbidden fruit .t How sin could gain admission into the minds of our first parents, who had been created perfectly holy, or how it gained an entrance into the holy minds of angels, and converted them into fiends of darkness, I do not under« take to explain. It is a deep, unfathomable mystery, * llosea, vi. 7. t Gen. iii. 1, 6. 46 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. which God has not revealed. I content myself with stating the fact, and the circumstances that are revealed. Dreadful were the effects of the first man's apostacy. Conviction of guilt made him sensible of his nakedness, and filled him with shame. Conscious of ill-desert, that voice, which was before music to his ear, and awakened in his breast no emotions but those of delight, now inspired him with terror, that prompted the vain attempt of hiding himself from an omnipresent and omniscient Being, among the trees of the garden. At the command of his Judge, the culprit is compelled to appear. Convicted of having violated the covenant, sentence is pronounced on him. The ground is cursed with barrenness on his account. He is doomed to labour and toil, and to eat his bread in the sweat of his brow, and in sorrow of heart. Sentence of death was passed on him: ^^Dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return." Deprived of that divine image in which he was created, he became totally depraved, dead in trespasses and sin, and alienated from the life of God; and had it not been for the wonderful interposition of divine grace in his favour, through the promised seed, the calami- ties of his earthly life would have been succeeded by the bitter pangs of eternal death. Our great progenitor, stained most deeply as he was with the guilt of a ruined world, was, we hope, selected to be the first triumph of that rich grace, of which it is recorded, ^^That where sin abounded, grace might much more abound.'' II. Having contemplated the fall of the first man, let us now contemplate the fall of his posterity. The connexion between the apostacy of Adam and the apostacy of his children, is a subject worthy of our serious THE FALL OF MAN AND ITS EFFECTS. 47 and devout investigation; a subject that has been frequently discussed, and in their views of which Christian divines differ widely. Some boldly affirm, we have nothing to do with Adam's first sin. It was his, not ours. We are not at all responsi- ble for it. fVe did not eat the forbidden fruit; we had no existence when our common father fell. The imputation of his sin is a novel doctrine, a mere fable.* *In the first number of the 2d vol. of " the Biblical Repertory and Theologi- cal Review," edited at Princeton, N. J. p. 77, will be found a valuable paper, entitled " The early History of Pelagianism." In that paper, the writer traces up the belief of the imputation of Adam'' s sin to the days of Augustin, who flourished in the fifth century, and shows that it was then regarded as a doctrine that had always been commonly received in the Church. That the Jews were familiar with the doctrine o^ imputed sin, is perfectly manifest from the sacrificial system, in which it was daily held up to their view, and especially on the great day of atonement. " And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel^ and all their transgressions in all their sin^ putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by a fit man into the wilderness; and the goat shall bear upon him aix THEIR iNiauiTiEs uuto a land not inhabited." Lev. xvi. 21, 22. In the conclusion of Edwards^ discourse on original sin, will be found a number of extracts to show, that " there is a great deal of reason, from the ancient Jewish writers, to suppose, that the doctrine of original sin had even been allowed in the open profession of that people." In that taken from 2 Esd. iii. 21, who wrote before the Saviour's birth, are contained these remarka- ble words, which looks very like an acquaintance with the doctrine of impu- tation : " O thou Adam, what hast thou done ! For though it was thou that sinned, thou art not fallen alone, hut we all that come of thee^ Still more to our point is the language of another ancient Jewish writer, who lived after Christ's appearing : " It is no wonder that the sin of Adam and Eve is writ- ten and sealed with the king's ring, and to be propagated to all following generations; because on the day that Adam was created, all things were finished, so that he stood forth the perfection and completion of the whole 48 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. It is perfectly easy to make such assertions; but they are reconcileable neither with the language of Moses, nor with the language of those theologians who utter them. How obvious is it to any one who attentively examines the inspired history of the fall, that the Judge of all the earth had, in passing sentence on the offending pair, respect to all their descendants? That all mothers participate in the peculiar sorrows of their mother Eve, is undeniable; and alike incontestable is it, that all men are doomed to the toil and sorrow to which Adam was sentenced. If we had nothing to do with the first sin of Adam, why are we included in the sentence pronounced on account of it? Why was the entire constitution of nature changed for its punishment? And why did the curse of barrenness de- scend, not only on Eden, Adam's residence, but on the whole earth? Equally irreconcileable are these assertions with the language used by those Christian divines who utter them, when speaking on the subject. That "Adam was our federal head and representative, '^ and that he "was not on trial for himself alone,'' is admitted by them. They also teach " that by a divine constitution, all his descendants were to have, in their natural state, the same character and condition with their progenitor;" and that "the universality and certainty of sin, therefore, are not the result of imita- workmanship of the world; so that when he sinned, the whole world sinned; whose sin we bear and suffer. But the matter is not thus with respect to the sins of his posterity." How clear and decided this language ! From this, we may learn how valuable are the recent discoveries in theo- logical science. A doctrine that has been taught in the Christian Church in every age, and in the Jewish Church before the advent of our blessed Lord, has, in this age of discovery, been found out to be a novel doctrine I THE FALL OF MAN AND ITS EFFECTS. 49 tion or accidental circumstances, but of a divine constitu- tion.^^ Who can reconcile such conflicting statements? We have nothing to do with Adam's sin; and yet we are, in consequence of it, born under a divine constitution that renders the sinning of every one of his natural descendants certain and inevitable! We are not at all responsible for Adam's sin; and yet, on account of it, we are delivered up to the certainty of sinning! Is not this a terrible punishment? If these opposite statements can be reconciled, I confess it to be above my comprehension. The fall of the first man, and the fall of his posterity, we believe to be inseparably connected. To the scriptural statement of your Shorter Catechism, we cordially sub- scribe: * and his infinite obligations to him for his existence and faculties, made it his duty instantly and without inquiry, to embrace the offer with adoring grati- tude. The proofs, then, that the covenant was just, are to be found, not in the fact that Adam acceded to it, but in its very nature, and in the infinite rectitude of the Supreme Being who devised it. And to the same sources are we to look for proofs of the justice of the covenant transaction, in reference to his posterity. The justice and equity of the covenant did not depend on the consent of the first man. It was inherently just and equitable, before his consent was obtained. Nor did the justice and equity of it depend at all upon the consent of his ofispring. So just and equitable was it in its provisions, requirements, responsibilities, pro- mises, and threatenings, that had we all been in existence at the time, and it had been proposed to us by our Creator, to entrust our vital interests in the hands of our first parent to act as our representative, we could not have declined the proposal, without dishonouring his infinite wisdom, and opposing his sovereign and righteous will. As the justice, so the s^oodness, of this dispensation of divine providence, is questioned and denied. Had the result of Adam's trial been difierent; had he, by his obedience, merited for himself and his posterity eternal life, none would have complained; all would have rejoiced in the benefits secured to them. But the result was unfortunate and calamitous. Adam fell by transgres- THE FALL OF MAN AND ITS EFFECTS. 65 sion, and involved all his children in the wide-spreading ruin J and now, many of them murmur and complain about the consequences. How unreasonable such conduct! The goodness of God in this transaction, is not to be determined by the result of man's trial, but by the nature of the covenant, and by the endowments of his new made creature. Had man full ability to perform the required obedience ? Was the threatening just, and the promised reward glorious? These are the questions to be asked, in relation to the goodness of God in this most interesting transaction. And who that understands the subject, can hesitate a moment, in giving an affirmative answer to the inquiries? The covenant, then, was good, before the apostacy of man; and if it was good then, its goodness could not be atfected by the unreasonable and inexcusable conduct of Adam, in violating its precepts, and thus ruining himself and his unborn race. How extravagant would it be in a criminal, suffering justly the penalty due to his offence, to complain of the severity of an administration that would have rejoiced to protect and favour him, if he had been obedient to the laws. If, then, the goodness of this covenant transaction, in reference to Adam, was not affected by the fatal result of his trial, the goodness of it in reference to his posterity, could not be affected by the same unhappy event. That the covenant, in its application to our first father, was good, has been shown; and none, it is presumed, will venture to deny it. This being admitted, it can never be proved to be otherwise than good, in its application to his offspring; because the same reasons that establish the one, can, with equal force, be urged to prove the other. 9 66 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. Besides, it ought to be considered, that this covenant dispensation was peculiarly kind in respect to Adam's chil- dren. He, in the mature state of his mental faculties, and with his glorious endowments, was unquestionably far better qualified for the trial, than any of his children could have been, who are brought into existence in an infantile state, and who must live some years before their faculties can be developed and matured. He had stronger motives to bind him to obedience than any other man could have had; for he knew that he was constituted the acting representative of all his posterity, and that their highest interests, as well as his own, depended on his compliance with the divine will. Had we all been in existence when God established his covenant with our common parent, we would, most cordially, have consented to his appointment as our federal head and covenant representative, and would have believed our interests to be more secure in his hands than they would have been in our own. The covenant therefore was "holy, just, and good." Several appropriate reflections might be subjoined to this discussion. But neither our time, nor your patience will grant the necessary indulgence. I forbear to trespass. Yet one reflection must not be omitted. It is this: how grate- ful should we be to God for the gracious and glorious provision which his infinite wisdom and mercy have made, for our recovery from a state of sin, guilt, and misery ! By the first Adam we fell; by the second Adam we rise. The same principle, which, in the covenant of w^orks, resulted in our ruin, applied to the covenant of grace, aflects our salvation. Adam, our representative in the former, sinned, and thus destroyed the hopes of the world; but Christ, the Lord of glory, the representative of his THE FALL OF MAN AND ITS EFFECTS. 67 people, in the latter, by yielding the required satisfaction for sin, and by performing most perfectly the demanded obedience, saves from sin, and death, and hell, and leads to everlasting happiness and glory, all the millions of our fallen race, who believe in him. Our first parent was overcome by Satan in a garden of delights; but Christ, our Lord, foiled him in a wilderness, combatted him amidst poverty, sorrow, and persecution, and finally triumphed over him on his cross. The intelligent reader of our chapter cannot fail to notice the parallel which the inspired writer runs between Christ and Adam, and how he shows that, as by the disobedience of the latter we were made sinners, so, by the obedience of the former, we may be made righteous; and that the grace of God, through his Son, triumphs, not only over the first sin of Adam imputed to us, but over our numberless and aggravated personal transgressions, and secures to us eternal life. And this parallel might be urged, as an additional proof of the truth contended for this evening. Believe it then, my dear hearers; it is not, as some imagine and represent it, an unimportant doctrine. On the contrary, it is highly important, particularly in its bearing upon another doctrine of deep and vital interest in the Christian system. Deny the imputation of Adam's sin, and then, to be consistent, you must discard from your creed the imputation of Chris fs righteousness to believ- ers, for their justification before God; a doctrine which, in the opinion of the great reformer Luther, was of para- mount importance in the religion of sinners. Indeed, it is vital; for although a man may, through prejudice of educa- tion, disbelieve this doctrine, and be saved, yet it is true, that no sinner ever was or will be conducted from thia QQ SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. fallen world to heaven, without the imputed righteousness of our Lord Jesus Christ. Believing, then, our fall in Adam, confess before God, that for his first transgression, as well as for your personal sins, you are justly condemned. Both classes of offence, original as well as actual, should be regarded as proper causes for shame and humiliation in the presence of infinite purity. Bewail, therefore, at the throne of grace, your fall in Adam, and that deeper ruin into which you have plunged yourselves, by your numberless and aggravated personal transgressions. But despair not; mercy reigns and triumphs. In the second Adam, there is life for the dead. *^I am the resurrection and the life," said Jesus to Martha; <^he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live: and whosoever liveth and believeth in me, shall never die." Delightful truth! Joyful new^s! Let us bless and praise God for tlie wonderful provisions of his infinite wisdom and mercy, by which the ruins of man's apostacy are repaired, the lost recovered, rebels pardoned, the guilty justified, sinners saved, hell-deserving wretches glorified, and the prisoners of justice exalted from the pri- son house to thrones in heaven, and changed into com- panions for angels, who never fell, but always retained their first and holy estate. "God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life." "Then Cometh the end, when he shall have delivered up the king- dom to God, even the Father; when he shall have put down all rule, and all authority and power; for he must reign till he hath put all enemies under his feet. The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death." Amen. * John, iii. 16. 1 Cor. xv. 24—26. SPRUCE STREET LECTURES, LECTURE III. Delivered on the Evening of the 25th December, 1831, hy the Rev. Samuel B. Howe, D.D. of Carlisle. THE USE OF THE MEANS OF GRACE. " Strive to enter in at the strait gate." — Luke xiii. 24, The importance of genuine piety, and the difficulty of its attainment and cultivation, are frequently pressed on our attention in the sacred pages. — The salvation of our souls de- pends on our possessing it, and yet, in our efforts to obtain it, innumerable foes oppose u.s, and innumerable obstacles must be surmounted. To encourage us, however, to meet every foe, and to bear every evil with unshrinking con- stancy, we are addressed with most urgent exhortations and alluring promises; assistance from on high is offered us in the conflict, and to him who overcometh it *^ shall be given to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the para- dise of God. ^' In the passage before us, and in a similar passage in the gospel of Matthew, the design of our Lord is to show the necessity of directing our attention to secure the salvation of our souls, from a consideration of the difficulties which we 10 70 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. must encounter in so doing, and from the ease with which we may mistake and perish. He represents us as travel- lers, journeying to unchanging abodes of bliss or wo, and assures us that our final destiny will depend on our present conduct. ^' Wide is the gate, and broad is the way that leadeth to destruction, and many there be who go in there- at." — While "strait is the gate, and narrow is the way which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.'' It becomes us, therefore, carefully to seek to enter in, since, if we mistake and fail, the consequences will be tremendously fearful. The exposition of the passage is easy. A gate usually stands at the head of a way, and through it we are admitted into the way, — the term way^ when applied to the actions and condition of men, means their habitual temper and conduct; and the narrow way, of which our Lord speaks, means that temper and conduct which are necessary for our admittance into heaven. We enter on this way only by a thorough conversion from sin to holiness, evidenced by unfeigned repentance and faith; and, until we have experienced this conversion, we have not taken one step in the pathway to bliss. This gate is called strait, because of the anguish of mind which usually ac- companies the commencement of a religious life. Into this gate our Lord commands us to strive to enter. In the original, the word which is translated strive, is very forcible. It signifies, to make a violent efibrt; to contend as in com- bat; to labour against opposition with the utmost endeav- our, both of body and of mind. This command is evidently addressed to the unconverted; to those who have not enter- ed the narrow way, who are outside of the gate, who are living impenitent in sin. Such are commanded "to strive to enter in at the strait gate" — that is, to seek for the con- THE USE OF THE MEANS OF GRACE. 71 version of their souls, that in the exercise of repentance and faith, they may enter on and lead a new life of holy obedi- ence. We need not fear to imitate our Lord Jesus; and here is a direct exhortation to the unregenerate to seek for repentance and faith. But how are they to be sought, since they are the fruits of the Spirit, the gift of God, and with- out his grace we never shall attain to them? We reply, they must be sought in the diligent use of those means of grace which God has appointed, and which are usually ac- companied with the influences of the Holy Spirit. To illus- trate, confirm, and enforce this truth, is the object of the en- suing Discourse; and may the Holy Spirit bless to our edifi- cation what shall be spoken. Two propositions invite our attention. I. There are means of grace; and in the use of these means divine influences are usually received, both for the conversion of sinners and the edification of believers. II. It is the duty of all men diligently to use these means. Having discussed these two propositions we shall, III. Notice some objections which have been urged against the doctrine which we advocate, and then, IV. Conclude with the practical improvement of our subject. I. There are means of grace. By a mean, is intended that which, as an instrument, con- duces to the attainment of an end; and by means of grace, are meant all those institutions of God in the use of which man seeks and usually obtains divine grace. All these means are adapted to the rational nature of man, and are fitted to inform his mind, to touch his conscience, and to awaken his afiections. It pleases God for the illustration of his wisdom, his 72 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. goodness, and his power, to administer his government by the intervention of means. Were it his pleasure to do so, he could, by a direct and immediate act of his own, bestow on us all that we need, preserve our existence, give health to our bodies, and knowledge to our minds; or he could rain down manna from heaven; or, without the toil of the husbandman, he could cause the harvest to spring up in rich abundance from the earth. Such, however, is not the method which his infinite wisdom has seen fit to adopt. His blessings flow to us through the intervention of means; we can obtain them only when we seek them by the use of proper means. If we would preserve life, we must usefood ; if we would enjoy health, we must practice temperance and prudence; if the scholar would acquire rich stores of various know- ledge, he must give his days and his nights to unremitted study; and if the husbandmen would rejoice in the abun- dance of his crops, he must submit to the toil of breaking up the ground, and of casting into it the precious seed. The success of these efforts depends on the blessing of God, and without that, they will be wholly ineffectual. We are com- manded, therefore, to put them forth in humble dependence on his assistance and blessing, and thus we are taught tore- cognise him as the author of all good, and carefully to no- tice and admire his perfections as exhibited in his works. The same system is established in the kingdom of Grace as that which prevails in the kingdom of Providence. They who ask, receive; they who seek, find. He who «* watches daily at Wisdom's gates, waiting at the posts of her doors, shall find her," and, along with her, life and blessedness. The means of grace become such only in consequence of the appointment of God. It is of the utmost importance to keep tliis trutli steadily in view, for there is a sinful pro- THE USE OF THE MEANS OF GRACE. 73 pensity in men to substitute their own inventions in place of the divine appointments. This propensity God frowns upon and rebukes. ^'In vain do ye worship me teaching for doc- trines the commandments of men." Our warrant for using- any ordinance, is derived from his appointment of it, while our encouragement to observe it, arises from his promise of accepting and blessing us in so doing. Whatever appear- ances of zeal, or of devotion, or of success, may be exhibited, awful delusion must attend the pursuit of any measures which God has not ordained. Among the means which are designed for the conversion of sinners, and the edification of believers, the three princi- pal are, the preaching of the Gospel; the written Word of God, and fervent prayer. One of the chief means of grace, both for the conversion of sinners, and the edification of believers, is the preaching of the Gospel. " It hath pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them who believe." "How," asks the apostle, "shall they call on him in whom they have not be- lieved? and how shall they believe on him of whom they have aot heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?" The ministry of reconciliation was appointed by the Re- deemer, just before his ascension to glory, when he com- manded his disciples to " go into all the world and preach the Gospel to every creature." After Paul had been called by his grace, he was sent as a messenger of mercy *^ to the Gentiles, to open their eyes and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God." The di- vine blessing has accompanied the ministers of the word from the days of the apostles to the present time. On the day of Pentecost, thousands were converted by the preaching 74 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. of Peter; the Lord opened Lydia's heart to attend to the things which were spoken by Paul; and in every succeed- ing age the preaching of the Gospel has been to thousands <' the power of God unto salvation." And the principal instrument employed by the Holy Spirit in the work of regeneration and sanctification of our souls, is the written Word. The apostle Peter reminds his other brethren that " they were born again, not of cor- ruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God which liveth and abideth forever." "The law of the Lord," says the Psalmist ^'is perfect, converting the soul." The special design of God in giving to us his Word, is to lead us into the knowledge of himself, and in the paths of life. *^ All scripture," says the apostle, "is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for re- proof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works." It has guided through life, up to the third heavens, myriads of the redeemed who are now walk- ing in the presence of God, and we shall do well to take heed to it "as to a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star arise in our hearts." Any attempt to sink the value of the living ministry, or of the written Word, is injurious to the highest interests of man- kind. The Word without the ministry would be neglected, and the ministry without the Word, would run into error, and introduce woful delusion. The word and the ministry united, are the great bulwarks of religion, and the instru- ments which God designs for the conversion, not merely of individuals, but of the world. To the ministry and the Word, we add fervent prayer. "Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; THE USE OF THE MEANS OF GRACE. 75 knock, and it shall be opened unto you." Prayer is the great medium of the intercourse which man holds with God, in which he opens the most secret desires of his soul, and confesses and deplores his sins, and makes known his wants. *« The effectual, fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much." "If ye, being evil, know how to give good gifts unto your children, how much more shall your heavenly Father give the Holy Spirit to them that ask Him." Besides the means of grace already mentioned, there are others which are highly important in themselves, and in the use of which, God has promised to bestow on us his grace. Among the chief of these we place the religious education of children. «' Train up a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not depart from it." The neglect of this duty is a principal reason of the awful amount of irreligion which every where prevails; for the surest method to banish religion from the world, is to banish it from families. The pious Baxter has given it as his opinion, that if every parent would faithfully discharge his duty in bringing up his children in the nurture and admo- nition of the Lord, it would almost render unnecessary the living ministry. Certain it is, that the neglect of it brings deep guilt on the parent, and shows an awful unconcern in relation to the highest interests of his child, by leaving him exposed to the pernicious influence of false sentiment and vi- cious example, without any fixed principles to save him from their contagion. The consequences on the part of the child are, generally, such as might be expected — an irreligious life, and an unhappy death. From the lips of pious and faithful parents, especially from the lips of a pious mother, the child generally receives his earliest, his best, and his 76 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES, most lasting impressions. To her it belongs to direct his first thoughts, to mould his temper; to give an impulse to all his feelings and desires; and her instructions, and warn- ings, and prayers, and tears, are the things which, amid all the waywardness and folly of mankind, are last forgotten by her child; which exert over his heart a most salutary in- fluence, and are often recalled with fond remembrance and gratitude. Should he be so unhappy as to be enticed by ungodly companions, and to fall into dissolute habits, the re- membrance of his mother's instructions and prayers will haunt his gayest hours, and check his mad career; and though he may have run deep in sinful excesses, will pro- bably bring him back a humble penitent to God — blessed reward for the anxieties, and sorrows, and instruction, and prayers, of maternal love, thus to have trained a child for holiness, and heaven, and God! Precious is the memory of such a parent to her offspring, for "her children rise up after her and call her blessed."* * A striking instance of the correctness of the above remarks occurred to the author immediately after he had preached this discourse. On his return home from Philadelphia, there was in the stage with him, as a fellow-passen- ger, a respected brother in the ministry, who resides in one of the western States. In the course of conversation, he gave to the author a short account of his religious history. He is the son of pious parents, who had devoted him in early life to God, and carefully instructed him in the principles of religion. When he had attained a sufficient age, he studied medicine, and, if I mistake not, attended the medical lectures at Philadelphia. Unfortunately, by perusing the works of some infidel writers, and by the influence of ungodly companions, his mind was corrupted, and he became a sceptic. He remarked, however, that he never could entirely embrace the sentiments of sceptical writers, owing to his having read so extensively in ancient history, which enabled him to detect the falsehood of many of their statements. He afterwards com- menced the practice of physic, and his irrcligion and scepticism were fre- THE USE OF THE MEANS OF GRACE. 77 Without enlarging on the other means of grace, we shall content ourselves with simply mentioning them. They are the following: — Serious meditation. "I thought on my way," 333^8 the Psalmist, ^^and turned my feet unto thy testimonies." Self-examination. «' Examine yourselves whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves; know ye not your own selves, except ye be reprobates." The company of pious men. « *'yet is he guilty, and shall bear his iniquity." In chap.' vii. 18, he that eateth of a peace-offering on the third day, ^^ shall bear his iniquity." So, xvii. 16, he that does not wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh after eating any thing torn by a wild beast, "shall bear his iniquity." Numb. ix. 13, he that does not partake of the passover "shall be cut off from among his people — he shall bear his sins." This expression is sometimes interchanged (and thereby explained) with the phrase "he shall die," "he shall be cut off from among the people," {Numb. xix. 19.) or, "he shall be guilty." In all the numerous passages, therefore, in which these words occur in reference to men, the mean- ing is obvious and uniform, for a man to bear his sins, is to bear the blame of them, to be punished for them. And, accordingly, to bear the sins of another, is to bear the blame of them — to be punished for them. So, in Numb. xiv. 33, Jeremiah's Zam. v. 7, and Ezek. xviii. 19, 20, 22 152 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. "The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son, but the soul that sinneth it shall die." Where the sense is too obvious to be at all questionable. That this is the meaning of the phrase as applied to Christ, by the prophet, is not only evident from the constant usage of the Bible, but from the pro- phet's own explanation, *^to bear our sins," is to bear our sorrows, stripes, sickness, chastisement; that is, our punish- ment. It is to be afflicted, wounded, smitten, and that of God, for our sins. It is plain, too, from its use in the sacri- ficial services. After the imposition of hands, and confes- sion, i. e. after the act of substitution, and the symbolical transfer of sin, the dying victim was said to bear the sins of the oflferer. And, finally, the same thing is evident from the admitted opinions of ancient nations in reference to this subject. The case, indeed, is so plain, that the interpreta- tion just given has secured the assent of all impartial com- mentators, orthodox or infidel. One of the most distin- guished of the latter class, remarks on this phrase, "If we wish to understand such expressions, we must revert to the opinion of all early nations, and especially of the Hebrews, that all calamities, particularly those of more than ordinary severity, were punishments inflicted immediately by God, and that they could only be removed by an innocent victim undergoing the punishment as a substitute, and thus stilling the anger of the ofiended Deit}^"* Another of the same class, says, in reference to representations contained in this chapter, [ha. liii.) "The majority of Hebrew readers, having their minds filled with the ideas of sacrifice and sub- stitution, must, of necessity, have so understood these pas- * Martini on Isaiah, liii. NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 153 sages ; and it is not to be doubted, that the mode in which the apostles presented the atoning death of Christ, rests mainly on this ground."* It is, therefore, with ihe fullest authority of scriptural usage, Grotius asserts, that, "To bear sins by suffering, that others may be pardoned, can mean nothing else than to bear the punishment of those sins.'^t And Archbishop Magee, though he is willing, for the sake of peace, to give up the word punishment, says, " But it is evident, that it (the suffering of Christ) is, not- withstanding, a judicial infliction;"^ the very idea which the word is intended to express. Although, therefore, the expression, *'to bear sin," may to our ears, mean either, 1st, to remove it; 2d, to suffer on the occasion of it; or,3d, to suffer its punishment; to the Jews, it could in such connexions, convey only the last idea, and consequently, to substitute for this either of the two former, is to make it express a sense, which, as we have shown, is contrary to Scripture usage, the opinions of the people to whom the prophet wrote, and therefore contrary to the ob- vious intention of the sacred writer, and mind of the Spirit. It is in this sense, too, the New Testament writers, in ad- dressing those "whose minds were filled with the ideas of sacrifice and substitution," who were imbued with the ideas and language of the Old Testament, assert that Christ "was offered to bear the sins of many," Hebrews ix. 28, that he "bare our sins in his own body on the tree." I Peter ii. 24. So in John i. 29, "Behold the Lamb of God which beareth the sin of the world," (according to the reading of the margin), and 1 John iii. 6, "He was manifested to bear * Gesenius on Isaiah liii. t Grotii Opera Theologia, vol. iv, p. 300. X On the Atonement, vol. i. p. 347. See also p. 316. 154 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. II. Precisely the same idea is clearly expressed by the apos- tle in Gal. iii. 13. In this chapter the apostle is engaged in proving, that faith in Christ is the only means by which we can attain the favour of God. One of his arguments is the following: <^As many as are of the works of the law, are under the curse ; for it is written, cursed is every one who continueth not in all things written in the book of the law to do them." But ^^ Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us: for it is written, cursed is every one who hangeth on a tree." It will of course be admitted that ^* the curse of the law," is its pe- nalty, and that to be under this curse, and to be 'a curse ' mean the same thing, the apostle himself teaches, as he substitutes for both expressions, the word "cursed." We are ^^underthe curse," because it is written, "cursed," &c. and Christ was "made a curse," for it is written "cursed, &c. There can be no doubt, therefore, that the literal meaning of this passage is, ^no one can be saved by obedience to the law, because, as the law demands perfect obedience, he who violates the least commandment is exposed to its penalty; but Christ has redeemed us from this penalty by bearing it in our stead. ^ It hardly seems possible to interpret the apostle's language in any other way. That Christ was pro- perly considered as suffering a penalty, the apostle confirms by appealing to a declaration of the law, that every one ju- dicially condemned was accounted accursed of God, (as the expression is in the passage quoted, Deut. xxi. 23,) i. e. ex- posed as an object of divine displeasure; one on whom, by the divine law, a penalty has fallen. So far, therefore, is this reference to the Old Testament from explaining away the previous assertion, that it is intended to confirm it. According to the doctrine of the apostle, then. NATURE OF THE ATONEMENT. 155 we are saved from the penalty of the law, by Christ bearing it in our stead. And this seems to be the ground of his arguing so often that Christ's death is tantamount to our death, and that it is not .by the relaxation of the law, as to its penalty, but by its execution that we arc saved, "Fori, by the law, am dead to the law," GaL ii. 19. i. e. free from its demands, so that there is now no condemna- tion to me, nor to any who are in Christ Jesus. III. Rom. viii. 3. The same course of reasoning occurs in Rom. viii. 3. '^The salvation which men in vain look for through the law, God has secured in another way. For as the law was insufficient, God having sent his Son in a nature the same with our own, and as a sin offering punished sin in him, that thus the demands of the law might be satis- fied by us." This seems to be the view of the passage best suited to the context, and the peculiar expressions which the apostle here employs. In this passage God is said to have sent his Son "in the likeness of sinful flesh," and it was in this flesh, (or nature) "that he punished or con- demned sin," not in our flesh, for this the context will not allow, but in the flesh in which his Son appeared, i. e. in his person, and the object of this vicarious condemnation is our exemption. IV. The same representation is found in 2 Cor. v. 21. The apostle had stated "that God was reconciling the world unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them;" and then states how it is that pardon was thus secured; "God made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness of God in him." He treated the Redeemer as though he were the sinner — that 156 SPRUCE STREET LECTURES. we might be treated as though we were righteous." As, <