O T} 1918 ^ l^GGfCAL W^^ Btfcourfe on tf)e morfl[)ip of ^riapus, AND ITS CONNECTION WITH THE MYSTIC THEOLOGY OF THE ANCIENTS. BY RICHARD PAYNf/kNIGHT, ESQ. (a new edition). TO WHICH rs ADDED AN ESSAY ON THE WORSHIP OF THE GENERATIVE POWERS DURING THE MIDDLE AGES OF WESTERN EUROPE. LONDON : PRIVATELY PRINTED. 1865. (Reprinted iSg^.) TWO ESSAYS ON THK WORSHIP OF PRIAPUS. ^ Edition limited to Jive hundred numbered copies printed from type^ twenty-five of which are large paper ; three hundred for England^ two hundred for America. No. 3^0 PREFACE TO THIS EDITION. ICHARD PAYNE KNIGHT, oneofthemoft diftinguifhed patrons of art and learning in Eng- land during his time, a fcholar of great attainments, an eminent antiquarian, member of the Radical party in Parliament, and a writer of great ability, was born at Wormefley Grange, in Herefordfhire, in 1750. From an early age he devoted himfelf to the ftudy of ancient literature, antiquities, and mythology. A large portion of his inherited fortune was expended in the colledion of antiq- uities, efpecially, ancient coins, medals, and bronzes. His col- leftion, which was continued until his death in 1820, was be- queathed to the Britifh Mufeum, and accepted for that inftitution by a fpecial ad of Parliament. Its value was eftimated at /'50.000. Among his works are an Inquiry into the Principles of Tajie ; Analytical EJfay on the Greek Alphabet ; The Symbolical Language of Ancient Art ; and three poems; 'The Landfcape, the Progrefs of Civil Society, and The Romance of Alfred. Tht IVor/hip of Priapus v/a.s printed in 1786, for diftribution by the Dilettanti Society, with which body the author was H PREFACE TO THIS EDITION. adively identified. This fociety embraced in its memberfhip Tome of the moft diftinguifhed fcholars in England, among others the Duke of Norfolk, Sir Jofeph Banks, Sir William Hamilton, Sir George Beaumont, the Marquis of Abercorn, Lord Charle- mont. Lord Dundas, Horace Walpole, and men of equal prom- inence. The bold utterances of Mr. Knight on a fubject which until that time had been entirely tabooed, or had been treated in a way to hide rather than to difcover the truth, jfhocked the fenfi- bilities of the higher clafTes of Englifh fociety, and the ministers and members of the various denominations of the Chriftian world. Rather than endure the ftorm of criticifm, aroufed by the publication, he fupprefTed during his lifetime all the copies of the book he could recall, confequently it became very fcarce, and continued fo for nearly a hundred years. In 1865 the work was reprinted, with an eflay added, carrying the inveftigation further, fhowing the prevalence during the mid- dle ages of beliefs and praftices fimilar tothofe defcribed in Knight's effay, only modified by the changed condition of fociety. The fupplementary eflay is now generally conceded to have been the work of the eminent author and antiquarian, Thomas Wright;^ aflifted by John Camden Hotten, the publifher of the 1865 edition. In their work they had the benefit of the vaft additions made during this century to the literature of the fubjeil, and of ' Perhaps no Englifhman of modern times, or of any time, has intelligently treated fo many different departments of literary refearch : Archaeology, Art, Bibliography, Chriftianity, Cuftoms, Heraldry, Literary Hiftory, Philology, Topography and Travels, are among the topics illuftrated by the learning, zeal and induftryofMr. Thomas Wright. — S. Austin Allibone. PREFACE TO THIS EDITION. iii the difcoveries of objects of antiquity at Herculaneum and Pom- peii, alfo in France, Germany, Belgium, England, Ireland, and in fad in nearly every country in Europe, illuftrating the fubjed they were inveftigating. The numerous illuftrations are engraved from antique coins, medals, ftone carvings, etc., preferved in the Payne Knight col- ledion in the Britirti Mufeum, and from other objeds difcovered in England and on the continent, fince the firft efTay was written. Thefe are only to be found in mufeums and private collections fcattered over Europe, and are pradically inacceflibleto the ftudent; they are here engraved and fully defcribed. The edition of 1865 was of a limited number of copies, and was foon exhaufted. When a copy occafionally appears in the audion room, or in the hands of a bookfeller, it brings a large advance on the original high publifhed price. The prefent edition, an exad reproduction of that of 1865, but correding fome manifeft mifprints, is publifhed in the intereft of fcience and fcholarihip. At a time when fo many learned inveftigators are endeavoring to trace back religious beliefs and pradices to their origin, it would feem that this is a branch of the fubjed which {hould not be ignored. The hiftory of religions has been ftudied with more zeal and fuccefs during the nineteenth century, than in all the ages which preceded it, and this book has now an intereft fifty fold greater than when originally publifhed. OSiober, 1894. PREFACE. ^^f]HE following pages are offered fimply as a con- tribution to fcience. The progrefs of human fociety (has, in different ages, prefented abundance of hor- _ rors and abundance of vices, which, in treating hiftory popularly, we are obliged to pafs over gently, and often to conceal ; but, neverthelefs, if we negled or fupprefs thefe fads altogether, we injure the truth of hiftory itfelf, almoft in the fame manner as we fhould injure a man's health by deflroying fome of the nerves or mufcles of his body. The fuperflitions which are treated in the two effays which form the prefent volume, formed a very important element in the working of the fecial frame in former ages, — in fad, during a very great part of the exiflence of man in this world, they have had much influence inwardly and outwardly on the charader and fpirit of fociety itfelf, and there- fore it is neceffary for the hiflorian to underftand them, and a part of the duties of the archaeologifl to invefligate them. The DifTertation by Richard Payne Knight is tolerably well known — vi PREFACE. at leaft by name — to bibliographers and to antiquaries, as a book of very confiderable learning, and at the fame time, as one which has become extremely rare, and which, therefore, can only be obtained occafionally at a very high price. It happened that, in a time when the violence of political feelings ran very high, the author, who was a member of the Houfe of Commons, belonged to the liberal party, and his book was fpitefully mifreprefented, with the defign of injuring his charader. We know the unjuft abufe which was lavifhed upon him by Mathias, in his now little- read fatire, the "Purfuits of Literature." Some of the Conti- nental archaeologifts had written on kindred fubjeds long before the time of Payne Knight. It was thought, therefore, that a new edition of this book, pro- duced in a manner to make it more acceflible to fcholars, would not be unacceptable. Payne Knight's defign was only to inveftigate the origin and meaning of a once extenfively popular worfhip. The hiftory of it is, indeed, a wide fubjed, and muft include all branches of the human race, in a majority of which it is in full force at the prefent day, and even in our own more highly civilized branch it has continued to exift to a far more recent period than we might be inclined to fuppofe. It is the objed; of the Efiay which has been written for the prefent volume — of which it forms more than one half — to inveftigate the exiftence of thefe superftitions among ourfelves, to trace them, in fadl, through the middle ages of Weftern Europe, and their influence on the hiftory of mediaeval and on the formation of modern fociety, and to place in the hands of hiftorical fcholars PREFACE. vn fuch of their monuments as we have been able to colled:. It is hoped that, thus compofed, the prefent volume will prove acceptable to the clafs of readers to whom it fpecially addreffes itfelf It muft not be fuppofed or expeded that this EfTay on the mediaeval part of the fubjed can be perfed. A large majority of the fads and monuments of mediaeval phallic worfhip have long perifhed, but many, hitherto unknown, remain ftill to be col- leded, and it may be hoped that the prefent EfTay will lead eventually to much more complete refearches as to the exiftence and influence of this worfhip in Weftern Europe during mediaeval times. Notes of fuch fuperjftitions are continually turning up unexpededly ; and we may mention as an example, that a copy of Payne Knight's treatife now before us contains a marginal note in pencil by a former pofleflx)r, Richard Turner, a colledor of curious books formerly refiding at Grantham in Lincolnfhire, in the following words: — "In 1850, I met with a Zingari, or Gypfy, who had an amulet beautifully carved in ivory, which fhe wore round her neck; fhe faid it was worth 30/., and fhe would not part with it on any account. She came from Florence. It was the Lingham and the Yoni united." This is curious as furnifhing apparent evidence of the relationfhip between the gipfies of Weftern Europe and India. London, September, 1865. CONTENTS. REFACE to this Edition, Preface to the Edition of 1865, Contents ..... Lill of Plates, with references to explanatory text Account of the Remains of the Worship of Priapus Letter from Sir William Hamilton . Lettera da Ifernia, 1780 . On the Worfhip of Priapus, by R. Payne Knight Page i V ix xiii 3 9 13 — J13 On the Worship of the Generative Powers during the Middle Ages of Western Europe : Abundant evidences of Phallic worfliip in the Roman colonies Aix, in Provence . Nimes, and its Roman Amphitheatre Xanten, in Hefle, and Antwerp Britain, and its Priapic remains The Teutonic Venus, Friga Fafcinum, and its magical influences Scotland, and its Phallic celebrations Phallic figures on public buildings Ireland, and its Shelah-na-Gig Reprefentation of the female organ exhibited in various countries Horfeflioes nailed to ilable-doors, a remain of the Shelah-na-Gig exhi bition ....... The ancient god Priapus becomes a faint in the Middle Ages . b 117 119 I 20 I 22 122 I 26 128 130 J31 132 134 139 139 CONTENTS. Marriage offerings to Priapus Antwerp, and its patron faint Ters M. Forgeais' coUertion of phallic amulets . The *' Fig," and its meanings The German Scrat, and the Gaulifli Dufii . Robin Goodfellow .... Liberalia and Floralia feftivities Eafter, and hot-crofs-buns Heaving and lifting cuftoms at Eafter . , May-day feftivities, and the May-pole Bonfires ....•• St. John's, or Midfummer-eve Mother Bunch's inftruftion to maidens Plants and flowers connefted with phallic worftiip . The mandrake ..... Lady Godiva, the Shrewfbury fhow, and the Guild feftival at F Pagan rites of the early Chriftians Gnoftics, Manichaeans, Nicolaits, followers of Florian, &c The Bulgarians, and their praftices Walter Mapes' account of the Patarini, and their fecret rites The Waldenfes and Cathari Popular oaths and phallic worfhip . Secret fociety in Orleans for celebrating obfcene rites The Stedingers of Germany, and their fecret ceremonies refton The Knights Templars : Charges brought againft them Spitting on the Crofs, and the denial of Chrift The Kifs .... Intercourfe with women prohibited The Cat and Idol worftiip Baflbmet, or Baphomet Von Hammer's defcription of the Templars' images or ♦' idol " The Witches' Sabbath : Thelaft form which the Priapeia and Liberalia aflumed in Weftern Europe 206 CONTENTS. XI Trial of witches at Arras, in France Sprenger and others on witchcraft in the fifteenth century Bodin's defcription of the Sabbath ceremonies Pierre de Lancre's full account of the Witches' Sabbath Pidorial reprefentation of the ceremonies . Similarity of the proceedings of the Sabbath to thofc of the Templars Intermixture of Priapic orgies with the Chriftian rites and ceremonies Traces of phallic worfhip ftill exifting on the weftern fhores of Ireland Page 207 209 210 z\ 2 245 246 H7 248 Index 249 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Note. — As frequent references are made to fame of the engraved figures in different parts of the work, it was found impofjible to infert the illuftrations always oppo- fite the explanatory text. The plates, therefore, have heen placed^ independently of the text, but in regular order. The following lijl, however, zvill refer the reader to thofe pages which explain the objeSls drawn : — Plate I. Ex VoTi OF Wax, from Isernia . II. Ancient and Modern Amulets : Figure i . . . 2 . 3 • • • III. Antique Gems and Greek Medals : Figure i 2 3 4 5 6,7 IV. Medals possessed by Payne Knight : Figure i 2 3 4 5 V. Figures of Pan, Gems, &c Figure i 2 3 4 VI. The Tauric Diana Defcribed on Page • 3. 7 4, 28, 90 28, 88 32 39 23, 90 104 33. 46 46,85 . 46 21, 33 33. 34. 35, 89 33, 46 • 38 • 73 37,42, 54 42 41 73 77 XIV LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Plate Defcnbec I on Page VII. Goat and Satyr, Greek Sculpture 33 VIII. Bronze Statue of Ceres 72 IX. Coins and Medals : Figure i . . . • . 29 2 29 3 21 4 71 5 70 6 80, 81 7 81, 83 8 105 9 79,88 ID I I 91.93 35. 79 12 71 '3 ; 71 X. Systrum, with Various Medals : Figure i . . . . . 67 2 ' 78, 79, 80 3 23 4 • 96 5 . 83 6 80 7 82 8 81 XL Sculpture from Elephanta 47,48 XII. Indian Temple, showing the Lingam 49 56, 61 XIII. Celtic Temple, Greek Medals, &c : Figure i, 2, 3, • 55 4 . 64 5 57.61 6, 7 61 8 . » 60 9, ID • 59 1 1 . 58 XIV. Portable Temple dedicated to Priapus or th E "Lingam" 55 XV. Temple Dedicated to Bacchus, at Puzzuoli : Figure i . 64, 65 2 . . . . 64, 66 3 . 66 Plate XVI. XVII. XVIII. XIX. XX. XXI. XXII. XXIII. XXIV. XXV. XXVI. XXVII. XXVIII. LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Ornament from Puzzuoli Temple : Figure i . 2 . Ornament from Puzzuoli Temple Egyptian Figures and Ornaments : Figure i . 2 . 3 ■ Egyptian Figures and Ornaments : Figure i 2 3 4 5 6, 7 The Lotus, with Medals of Melita, &c : Figure i . 2 . 3 . Bacchus, Medals of Camarina, Syracuse, &c Figure i . 2, 3 4, 5, 6 7 . Statue of a Bull at Tanjore Tiger at the Breast of a Nymph Sculpture from Elephanta (^See P/ate XI.) Roman Sculptures from Nimes : Figure i , 2 3 • 4 . Monument found at N^mes in 1825 Phallic Figures, &c. found in England : Figure i, 2, 3, 4 . Phallic Monuments found in Scotland, &c Figure i . 2, 3 XV Defcribed on F\ige 81 78 65 5', 87, 89 50, 87, 89 62 87, 88 89 54 34, 89 87,89 53 50 88 95 90 75 34 74 47, 48 1 20 1 21 122, 136 119, 121 '23 I 24 12S XVI LISr OF ILLUSTRATIONS. Plate. XXIX. Shelah-na-Gig Monuments : Figure i, 2, 3, 4 XXX. Shelah-na-Gig Monuments : Figure i, 2, 3, . XXXI. Venus of the Vandals, Bronze Images, &c : Figure i, 2, 3, 4, 5 6 ..... XXXII. Ornaments from the Church of San Fedele Figure i, 2, 3 . XXXIII. Phallic Leaden Tokens from the Seine : XXXIV. Leaden Ornaments from the Seine : Figure i .... 2, 3, 4, 5 XXXV. Amulets, &c. of Gold and Lead : Figure i, 2, 3, 4, 5 XXXVI. Robin Goodfellow, Phallic Amulets, &c Figure i 2 3 4 5 XXXVII. Priapic Illustrations from Old Ballads Figure \ ... 2 ... XXXVIII. "Idol" of the Knights Templars XXXIX. Sculptures of the Templars' Mysteries : Figure 1 .... 2 .... 3 .... 4 • • • •. XL. The Witches' Sabbath, from De Lancre, 161 3 Defcribed on Page . 133 to 139 . 133 to 139 136 to 138 138 137 to 138 146, 170 , , 146 147 H7 148 148 121 137 153 154 153 199 199 to 203 200 to 203 200 to 204 199 to 204 245, 246 AN ACCOUNT OF THE REMAINS OF THE WORSHIP OF PRIJPUS, LATELY EXISTING AT ISERNIJ, in the Kingdom of NAPLES: IN TWO LETTERS; One from Sir William Hamilton, K.B., His Majefty's Minifter at the Court of Naples, to Sir Joseph Banks, Bart., Prefident of the Royal Society. And the other from a Perfon refiding at Ifernia : TO WHICH IS ADDED, A DISCOURSE ON the WORSHIP of PRIAPUS, And its Connexion with the myftic Theology of the Ancients. By R. P. KNIGHT, Efq. LONDON: Printed by T. Spilsbury, Snowhill. m.dcc.lxxxvi. A LETTER FROM SIR WILLIAM HAMILTON, Etc. Sir, Naples, Dec. 30, 1781, lAVING laft year made a curious difcovery, that in a Province of this Kingdom, and not fifty miles from its Capital, a fort of devotion is ftill paid to Pria- pus, the obfcene Divinity of the Ancients (though under another denomination), I thought it a circum- ftance worth recording ; particularly, as it offers a frefh proof of the fimilitude of the Popifh and Pagan Religion, fo well obferved by Dr. Middleton, in his celebrated Letter from Rome: and there- fore I mean to depofit the authentic^ proofs of this aflertion in the Britifh Mufeum, when a proper opportunity fhall offer. In the mean time I fend you the following account, which, I flatter myfelf, will amufe you for the prefent, and may in future ferve to illuflrate thofe proofs. I had long ago difcovered, that the women and children of the lower clafs, at Naples, and in its neighbourhood, frequently wore, ' A fpecimen of each of the ex-votioi wzx, with the original letter from Ifernia. See the Ex-voti, Plate i. 4 A LEri'ER FROM as an ornament of drefs, a fort of Amulets, (which they imagine to be a prefervative from the mal occhii, evil eyes, or enchantment) exadly fimilar to thofe which were worn by the ancient Inhabitants of this Country for the very fame purpofe, as likewife for their fuppofed invigorating influence ; and all of which have evidently a relation to the Cult of Priapus. Struck with this conformity in ancient and modern fuperfliition, I made a colledion of both the ancient and modern Amulets of this fort, and placed them together in the Britifh Mufeum, where they remain. The modern Amulet mofl: in vogue reprefents a hand clinched, with the point of the thumb thruft betwixt the index and middle^ finger; the next is a fhell ; and the third is a half-moon. Thefe Amulets (except the fhell, which is ufually worn in its natural fl:ate) are mofl: commonly made of filver, but fometimes of ivory, coral, amber, cryftal, or fome curious gem, or pebble. We have a proof of the hand above defcribed having a connexion with Priapus, in a mofl elegant fmall idol of bronze of that Divinity, now in the Royal Mufeum of Portici, and which was found in the ruins of Her- culaneum : it has an enormous Phallus, and, with an arch look and gefliure, ftretches out its right hand in the form above men- tioned;^ and which probably was an emblem of confummation : and as a further proof of it, the Amulet which occurs mofl: fre- quently amongft thofe of the Ancients (next to that which reprefents the Ample Priapus), is fuch a hand united with the Phallus ; ot which you may fee feveral fpecimens in my colle6lion in the Britifli Mufeum. One in particular, I recoiled;, has alfo the half- moon joined to the hand and Phallus ; which half-moon is fuppofed to have an allufion to the female menfes. The fhell, or concha veneris. 1 See Plate ii.. Fig. i. 2 This elegant little figure is engraved in the firft volume of the Bronzes of the Herculaneum. SIR fVILLIAM HAMILTON. 5 is evidently an emblem of the female part of generation. It is very natural then to fuppofe, that the Amulets reprefenting the Phallus alone, fo vifibly indecent, may have been long out of ufe in this civilized capital ; but I have been aflured, that it is but very lately that the Priefts have put an end to the wearing of fuch Amulets in Calabria, and other diftant Provinces of this Kingdom. A new road having been made laft year from this Capital to the Province of Abruzzo, paffing through the City of Ifernia (an- ciently belonging to the Samnites, and very populous^), a perfon ot liberal education, employed in that work, chanced to be at Ifernia juft at the time of the celebration of the Feaft of the modern Priapus, St. Cofmo ; and having been ftruck with the Angularity of the ceremony, fo very fimilar to that which attended the ancient Cult of the God of the Gardens, and knowing my tafte for anti- quities, told me of it. From this Gentleman's report, and from what I learnt on the fpot from the Governor of Ifernia himfelf, having gone to that city on purpofe in the month of February laft, I have drawn up the following account, which I have reafon to believe is ftridly true. I did intend to have been prefent at the Feaft of St. Cofmo this year; but the indecency of this ceremony having probably tranfpired, from the country's having been more frequented fince the new road was made, orders have been given, that the Great 'To^ of the Saint fhould no longer be expofed. The fol- lowing is the account of the Fete of St. Cofmo and Damiano, as it adually was celebrated at Ifernia, on the confines of Abruzzo, in the Kingdom of Naples, fo late as in the year of our Lord 1780. On the 27th of September, at Ifernia, one of the moft ancient ^ The aftual population of Ifernia, according to the Governor's account, is 5 1 56. 2 See the Italian letter, printed at the end of this, from which it appears the modern Priapi were fo called at Ifernia. 6 A LErrER FROM cities of the Kingdom of Naples, fituated in the Province called the Contado di Molife, and adjoining to Abruzzo, an annual Fair is held, which lafts three days. The fituation of this Fair is on a rifing ground, between two rivers, about half a mile from the town of Ifernia; on the moft elevated part of which there is an ancient church, with a veftibule. The architecture is of the ftyle of the lower ages; and it is faid to have been a church and convent be- longing to the Benedidine Monks in the time of their poverty. This church is dedicated to St. Cofmus and Damianus. One of the days of the Fair, the relicks of the Saints are expofed, and afterwards carried in proceffion from the cathedral of the city to this church, attended by a prodigious concourfe of people. In the city, and at the fair, ex-voH of wax, reprefenting the male parts of generation, of various dimenlions, fome even of the length of a palm, are publickly offered to fale. There are alfo waxen vows, that reprefent other parts of the body mixed with them ; but of thefe there are few in comparifon of the number of the Priapi. The devout diftributers of thefe vows carry a bafket full of them in one hand, and hold a plate in the other to receive the money, crying aloud, "St. Cofmo and Damiano!" If you afk the price of one, the anfwer is, pin ci metti^ piu meriti : " The more you give, the more's the merit." In the veftibule are two tables, at each of which one of the canons of the church prefides, this crying out, ^ijt riceveno le Mijfe^ e Litanie : " Here MafTes and Lita- nies are received;" and the other, ^ifi riceveno li Voti : " Here the Vows are received." The price of a Mafs is fifteen Neapolitan grains, and of a Litany five grains. On each table is a large bafon for the reception of the different offerings. The Vows are chiefiy prefented by the female fex ; and they are feldom fuch as reprefent legs, arms, &;c., but moft commonly the male parts of generation. The perfon who was at this fete in the year 1780, and who gave me this account (the authenticity of every article of which has fince SIR fVILLIAM HAMILTON. 7 been fully confirmed to me by the Governor of Ifernia), told me alfo, that he heard a woman fay, at the time flie prefented a Vow, like that which is prefented in Plate 1. Fig. i., Santo Cojmo bene- detto, coji lo voglio : " Bleffed St. Cofmo, let it be like this ;" another, St. Cojimo, a te mi raccommendo: " St. Cofmo, I recommend myfelf to you ;" and a third, St. Cojimo^ ti ringrazio : " St. Cofmo, I thank you." The Vow is never prefented without being accompanied by a piece of money, and is always kifled by the devotee at the moment of prefentation. At the great altar in the church, another of its canons attends to give the holy undion, with the oil of St. Cofmo ;^ which is pre- pared by the fame receipt as that of the Roman Ritual, with the addition only of the prayer of the Holy Martyrs, St. Cofmus and Damianus. Thofe who have an infirmity in any of their members, prefent themfelves at the great altar, and uncover the member affeded (not even excepting that which is moft frequently repre- fented by the ex-voti) ; and the reverend canon anoints it, faying, Per inter cejfionem heati Cqfmi, liberet te ah omni malo. Amen. The ceremony finifhes by the canons of the church dividing the fpoils, both money and wax, which muft be to a very confiderable amount, as the concourfe at this fete is faid to be prodigioufly numerous. The oil of St. Cofmo is in high repute for its invigorating quality, when the loins, and parts adjacent, are anointed with it. No lefs than 1400 flafks of that oil were either expended at the altar in undions, or charitably diftributed, during this fete in the year 1780 ; and as it is ufual for every one, who either makes ufe ' The cure of difeafes by oil is likewife of ancient date ; for Tertullian tells us, that a Chriftian, called Proculus, cured the Emperor Severus of a certain dillemper by the ufe of oil ; for which fervice the Emperor kept Proculus, as long as he lived, in his palace. 8 LErrER FROM SIR W. HAMILTON. of the oil at the altar, or carries off a flalk of it, to leave an alms for St. Cofmo, the ceremony of the oil becomes likewife a very lucrative one to the canons of the church. I am. Sir, With great truth and regard. Your moft obedient humble Servant, William Hamilton. LETTERA DA ISERNIA, Nell* Anno, 1780. N Ifernia CittL\ Sannitica, oggi della Provincia del Contado di Molife, ogni Anno li 27 Settembre vi e una Fiera della clafTe delle perdonanze (cofi dette negl' Abruzzi li gran mercati, e fiere non di lifta) : Ouefta fiera fi fa fopra d'una Collinetta, che fta in mezzo a due fiumi ; diftante mezzo miglio da Ifernia, dove nella parte piu elevata vi e un antica Chiefa con un veftibulo, archi- tettura de' bafli tempi, e che fi dice efler ftata Chiefa, e Moniftero de P. P. Benedettini, quando erano poveri ? La Chiefa e dedicata ai Santi Cosmo e Damiano, ed e Grancia del Reverendiffimo Capi- tolo. La Fiera e di 50 baracche a fabrica, ed i Canonici affittano le baracche, alcune 10, altre 15, al piu 20, carlini Tuna; affittano ancora per tre giorni 1' ofteria fatta di fabbrica docati 20 ed i comeftibili folo benedetti. Vi e un Eremita della fteffa umanita del fii F. Gland guardiano del Monte Vefuvio, cittato con rifpetto dall' Ab. Richard. La fiera dura tre giorni. II Maeftro di fiera 6 il Capitolo, ma commette al Governatore Regio ; e quefta alza bandiera con I'imprefa della Citta, che e la ftefla imprefa de P. P. Celeftini. Si fa una Proceffione con le Reliquie dei Santi, ed efce dalla Catte- drale,eva alia Chiefa fudetta; mac pocodevota. II giorno della fefta, si per la Citt£l,come nellacollinetta vi e un gran concorfo d' Abitatori c lo LETTERA BA ISERNIA, del Motefe, Malnarde, ed altri Monti vicini, che la ftranezza delli veftimenti delle Donne, fembra, a chi non ha gl' occhi avvezzi ave- derle, il pui bel ridotto di mafcherate. Le Donne della Terra del Gallo fono vere figlie dell' Ordine Serafico Cappuccino, veftendo come li Zoccolanti in materia, e forma. Puelle di Scanno Sembrano Greche di Scio. Puelle di Carovilli Armene. Puelle delle Pefche, e Carpinone tengono ful capo alcuni panni roffi con ricamo di filo bianco, difegno ful gufto Etrufco, che a pochi pafTi fembra merletto d'Inghilterra. Vi e fra quefte Donne vera belezza, e diverfita grande nel veftire, anche fra due popolazioni viciniffime, ed un attaccamento particolare di certe popolazioni ad un colore, ed altre ad altro. L' abito e diftinto nelle Zitelle, Maritate, Vedove, e Donne di piacere? Nella fiera ed in Citta vi fono molti divoti, che vendono mem- bri virili di cera di diverfe forme, e di tutte le grandezze, fino ad un palmo ; e mifchiate vi fono ancora gambe, braccia, e faccie ; ma poche fono quefte. Quel li vendono tengono un cefto, ed un piatto ; li membri rotti fono nel cefto, ed il piatto ferve per racco- gliere il danaro d'elemoiina. Gridano S. Cosmo e Damiano. Chi € fprattico domanda, quanto un vale ? Rifpondono^zY/ cimetti^piii meriti. Avanti la Chiefa nel veftibolo del Tempio vi fono due tavole, ciafcunacon fedia, dove prefiede un Canonico, e fuol' eftere uno il Primicerio, e I'altro Arciprete ; grida uno qui Jt ricevono le Mejfe^ e Litanie : V^hrOy qui ft ricevono li voti ; fopra delle tavole in ogn' una vi e un bacile, che ferve per raccogliere li membri di cera, che mai fi prefentano foli, ma con denaro, come ft e pratticato fempre in tutte le prefentazioni di membri, ad eccezzione di quelli deir Ifola di Ottaiti. Quefta divozione e tutta quafi delle Donne, e fono pochiftimi quelli, o quelle che prefentano gambe, e braccia, mentre tutta la gran fefta s' aggira a profitto de membri della gene- razione. lo ho intefo dire ad una donna. Santo Cojimo henedetto^ coji lo voglio. Altre dicevano, Santo CoJimo a te mi raccommando : LETTERA DA ISERNIA. ii altre, Santo Co/mo ringrazio ; e quefto c quello oflerval, e fi prat- tica nel veftibulo, baciando ogn 'una il voto che prefente. Dentro la chiefa nell' altare magglore un canonico fa le flmte unzioni con 1' olio di S. Cofimo. La ricetta di queft' olio u la fteffa del Rituale Romano, con 1' aggiuntadell' orazionedelli SS. Martiri, Cofimo e Damiano. Si prefentano all' Altare gl' Infermi d' ogni male, fnudano la parte offefa, anche 1' originale della copia di cera, ed il Canonico ungendoli dice. Per intercejfionem beati Cqfmi, liberet te ah omni malo. Amen. Finifce la fefta con dividerfi li Canonici la cera, ed il denaro, e con ritornar gravide molte Donne fterili maritate, a profitto della popolazione delle Provincie ; e fpeffo la grazia s' entende fenza meraviglia, alle Zitelle, e Vedove, che per due notti hanno dormito, alcune nella Chiefa de' P. P. Zoccolanti,ed altre delli Capuccini, non eflendoci in Ifernia Cafe locande per alloggiare tutto il numero di gente, che concorre : onde li Frati, ajutando ai Preti, danno le Chiefe alle Donne, ed i Portici agl' Uomini ; e cofi Divifi fucce- dendo gravidanze non deve dubitar si, che fi a opera tutta miraco- lofa, e di divozione. NOTA I. L' olio non folo ferve per 1' unzione che fa il Canonico, ma anche fi difpenfa in piccioliifime caraffine, e ferve per ungerfi li lombo a chi ha male a quefta parte. In queft' anno 1780. fi fono date par divozione 1400 caraffine, e fi c confumato mezzo Stajo d' olio. Chi prende una caraffina da 1' olemofina. NoTA II. Li Canonici che fiedono nel Veftibulo prendono denaro d' Ele- mofina per Mefte, e per Litanie. Le MefTea grana 1 5. e le Litanie a grana 5. 12 LETTERA DA ISERNIA. NOTA III. Li foreftieri alloggiano non folo fra li Cappuccini e Zoccolanti, ma anche nell' Eramo di S. Cofmo. Le Donne che dormono nelle chiefe de' P. P. Sudetti fono guardate dalli Guardiani, Vicarj e Padri piu di merito, e quelli dell' Eremo fono in cura dell' Eremita, divife anche dai Proprj Mariti, e fi fanno fpeflb miracoli fenza incomodo delli fanti. Le non le gufta, quando 1' avra letta Tornera bene fame una baldoria : Che le daranno almen qualche diletto Le Monachine quando vanno a letto. ON THE WORSHIP OF PRIAPUS. EN, confidered colledively, are at all times the fame animals, employing the fame organs, and endowed with the fame faculties : their pafTions, prejudices, and conceptions, will of courfe be formed upon the fame internal principles, although'direded to various ends, and modified in various ways, by the variety of external cir- cumftances operating upon them. Education and fcience may cor- red, reftrain, and extend ; but neither can annihilate or create : they may turn and embellifh thecurrents ; but can neither ftop nor enlarge the fprings, which, continuing to flow with a perpetual and equal tide, return to their ancient channels, when the caufes that perverted them are withdrawn. The firft principles of the human mind will be more diredly brought into adion, in proportion to the earneftnefs and afleftion with which it contemplates its objed ; and paffion and prejudice will acquire dominion over it, in proportion as its firfl: principles are more direcflly brought into aftion. On all common fubjedls, this dominion of paffion and prejudice is reftrained by the evidence of fenfe and perception ; but, when the mind is led to the contemplation of things beyond its comprehenfion, all fuch refliraints vanifh : reafon has then 14 ON THE WORSHIP nothing to oppofe to the phantoms of imagination, which acquire terrors from their obfcurity, and didate uncontrolled, becaufe un- known. Such is the cafe in all religious fubjeds, which, being beyond the reach of fenfe or reafon, are always embraced or rejeded with violence and heat. Men think they know, becaufe they are fure they feel ; and are firmly convinced, becaufe ftrongly agitated. Hence proceed that hafte and violence with which devout perfons of all religions condemn the rites and dodrines of others, and the furious zeal and bigotry with which they maintain their own ; while perhaps, if both were equally well underftood, both would be found to have the fame meaning, and only to differ in the modes of con- veying it. Of all the profane rites which belonged to the ancient poly- theifm, none were more furiouily inveighed againft by the zealous propagators of the Chriftian faith, than the obfcene ceremonies per- formed in the worfhip of Priapus ; which appeared not only contrary to the gravity and fandity of religion, but fubverfive of the firft principles of decency and good order in fociety. Even the form itfelf, under which the god was reprefented, appeared to them a mockery of all piety and devotion, and more fit to be placed in a brothel than a temple. But the forms and ceremonials of a religion are not always to be underfliood in their dired and obvious fenfe ; but are to beconfideredas fymbolical reprefentations of fome hidden meaning, which may be extremely wife and jufi:, though the fymbols themfelves, to thofe who know not their true fignification, may appear in the highefl: degree abfurd and extravagant. It has often happened, that avarice and fuperfi:ition have continued thefe fym- bolical reprefentations for ages after their original meaning has been lofl: and forgotten ; when they muft of courfe appear non- fenfical and ridiculous, if not impious and extravagant. Such is the cafe with the rite now under confideration, than which OF PRIAPUS. 15 nothing can be more monftrous and indecent, if confidered in its plain and obvious meaning, or as a part of the Chriftian worfliip ; but which will be found to be a very natural fymbol of a very natural and philofophical fyftem of religion, if confidered according to its original ufe and intention. What this was, I fhall endeavour in the following fheets to explain as concifelv and clearly as poffible. Thofe who wifh to know how generally the fymbol, and the religion which it reprefented, once prevailed, will confult the great and elaborate work of Mr. D'Han- carville, who, with infinite learning and ingenuity, has traced its progrefs over the whole earth. My endeavour will be merely to fhow, from what original principles in the human mind it was firft adopted, and how it was connected with the ancient theology : mat- ters of verv curious inquiry, which will ferve, better perhaps than any others, to illuftrate that truth, which ought to be prefent in every man's mind when he judges of the adions of others, that in morals^ as well as phyjics^ there is no ejfe£l without an adequate cauje. If in doing this, I frequently find it neceflary to differ in opinion with the learned author above-mentioned, it will be always with the ut- moft deference and refpedl ; as it is to him that we are indebted for the onlv reafonable method of explaining the emblematical works of the ancient artifts. Whatever the Greeks and Egyptians meant by the fymbol in queftion, it was certainly nothing ludicrous or licentious; of which we need no other proof, than its having been carried in folemn proceffion at the celebration of thofe myfteries in which the firft principles of their religion, the knowledge of the God of Nature, the Firft, the Supreme, the Intelledtual,^ were preferved free from the vulgar fuperftitions, and communicated, under the ftridleft oaths of 1 Plut. de Is. et Os. i6 ON THE WORSHIP fecrecy, to the iniated (initiated) ; who were obliged to purify them- felves, prior to their initiation, by abftaining from venery, and all impure food.^ We may therefore be aflured, that no impure mean- ing could be conveyed by this fymbol ; but that it reprefented fome fundamental principle of their faith. What this was, it is difficult to obtain any dired information, on account of the fecrecy under which this part of their religion was guarded. Plutarch tells us, that the Egyptians reprefented Ofiris with the organ of generation ered, to fhow his generative and prolific power : he alfo tells us, that Ofiris was the same Deity as the Bacchus of the Greek Mytho- logy ; who was alfo the fame as the firft begotten Love (E/jw? 7r/3a)T07oi^o9) of Orpheus and Hefiod.^ This deity is celebrated by the ancient poets as the creator of all things, the father of gods and men;" and it appears, by the pafi"age above referred to, that the organ of generation was the fymbol of his great charaaerifl;ic attribute. This is perfedly confiflient with the general practice of the Greek artifl:s, who (as will be made appear hereafter) uniformly reprefented the attributes of the deity by the correfponding pro- perties obferved in the objedis of fight. They thus perfonified the epithets and titles applied to him in the hymns and litanies, and conveyed their ideas of him by forms, only intelligible to the ini- tiated, inftead of founds, which were intelligible to all. The organ of generation reprefented the generative or creative attribute, and in the language of painting and fculpture, fignified the fame as the epithet Trayyeverco^^ in the Orphic litanies. This interpretation will perhaps furprife thofe who have not been accufliomed to divefl: their minds of the prejudices of education and fafiiion ; but I doubt not, but it will appear jufl: and reafonable to thofe who confider manners and cuftoms as relative to the natural 1 Plut. tie Is. ei Os. ^ Ibid. ^ Orph. Jrgon. 422. OF PRI APUS. 17 caufes which produced them, rather than to the artificial opinions and prejudices of any particular age or country. There is naturally no impurity or licentioufnefs in the moderate and regular gratifica- tion of any natural appetite ; the turpitude confifting wholly in the excefs or perverfion. Neither are organs of one fpecies of enjoy- ment naturally to be confidered as fubjefts of fliame and conceal- ment more than thofe of another ; every refinement of modern manners on this head being derived from acquired habit, not from nature: habit, indeed, long eftablifhed ; for it feems to have been as general in Homer's days as at prefent ; but which certainly did not exift when the* myftic fymbols of the ancient worfhip were firft adopted. As thefe fymbols were intended to exprefs abftraft ideas by objeds of fight, the contrivers of them naturally felefted thofe objeds whofe charaderiftic properties feemed to have the greateft analogy with the Divine attributes which they wifhed to reprefent. In an age, therefore, when no prejudices of artificial decency exifted, what more juft and natural image could they find, by which to exprefs their idea of the beneficent power of the great Creator, than that organ which endowed them with the power of procreation, and made them partakers, not only of the felicity of the Deity, but of his great charadleriftic attribute, that of multiplying his own image, communicating his bleffmgs, and extending them to genera- tions yet unborn ? In the ancient theology of Greece, preferved in the Orphic Fragments, this Deity, the E/0ft)9 irpcoroyovo'?, or firft-begotten Love, is faid to have been produced, together with i^ther, by Time, or Eternity {Kpovo<;), and NecefTity {Avayxv)y operating upon inert matter {Xao<: ). He is defcribed as eternally begetting {aeiyvrjTrj^ ) ; the Father of Night, called in later times, the lucid or fplendid, {(f)avr]^)^ becaufe he firft appeared in fplendour; of a double nature, (St^u??? ), as pofTefling the general power of creation i8 ON "THE WORSHIP and generation, both aftive and pafTive, both male and female.^ Light is his neceffary and primary attribute, co-eternal with him- 'Orph. Argo7i., ver. i 2. This poem of the Argonautic Expedition is not of the ancient Orpheus, but written in his name by fome poet pofterior to Homer ; as appears by the allufion to Orpheuf's defcent into hell ; a fable invented after the Homeric times. It is, however, of very great antiquity, as both the flyle and manner fufficiently prove ; and, I think, cannot be later than the age of Pififtratus, to which it has been generally attributed. The paflage here referred to is cited from another poem, which, at the time this was written, paffed for a genuine work of the Thracian bard : whether jullly or not, matters little ; for its being thought fo at that time proves it to be of the remoteft antiquity. The other Orphic poems cited in this difcourfe are the Hymns, or Litanies, which are attributed by the early Chriftian and later Platonic writers to Onomacritus, a poet of the age of Pififtratus ; but which are probably of various authors (See Brucker. Hijl. Crit. Philos., vol. i., part 2, lib. i., c. i.) They contain, however, nothing which proves them to be later than the Trojan times ; and if Onomacritus, or any later author, had anything to do with them, it feems to have been only in new-verfifying them, and changing the dialed (See Gefner. Proleg. Orphica, p. 26). Had he forged them, and attempted to impofe them upon the world, as the genuine compofitions of an ancient bard, there can be no doubt but that he would have fluffed them with antiquated words and obfolete phrafes ; which is by no means the cafe, the language being pure and worthy the age of Pififtratus. Thefe poems are not properly hymns, for the hymns of the Greeks contained the nativities and aftions of the gods, like thofe of Homer and Callimachus ; but thefe are compofitions of a different kind, and are properly invocations or prayers ufed in the Orphic myfteries, and feem nearly of the fame clafs as the Pfalms of the Hebrews. The reafon why they are fo feldom mentioned by any of the early writers, and fo perpetually referred to by the later, is that they belonged to the myftic worfliip, where everything was kept concealed under the ftricteft oaths of fecrefy. But after the rife of Chriftianity, this facred filence was broken by the Greek converts, who revealed everything which they thought would depreciate the old religion or recommend the new ; whilft the heathen priefts revealed whatever they thought would have contrary tendency; and endeavoured to fhow, by publifliing the real myftic creed of their religion, that the principles of it were not ib abfurd as its outward ftrufture feemed to infer ; but that, when ftripped of poetical allegory and vulgar fable, their theology was pure, reafonable, and fublime (Gefner. Proleg. Orphica). The colledlion of thefe poems now extant, being pro- bably compiled and verfified by feveral hands, with fome forged, and others interpo- lated and altered, muft be read with great caution ; more efpecially the Fragments OF PRIAPUS. 19 felf, and with him brought forth from inert matter by neceffity. Hence the purity and fandity always attributed to light l)y the preferved by the Fathers of the Church and Ammonian Platonics ; for thefe writers made no fcruple of forging any monuments of antiquity wliich luitcd their purpofes ; particularly the former, who, in addition to their natural zeal, having the interells or a confederate body to fupport, thought every means by which they could benefit that body, by extending the lights of revelation, and gaining profelytes to the true faith, not only allowable, but meritorious (See Clementina, Hom, vii., fee. 10. Recogn. lib. i., ^^c. 65. Origen. apud Hieronom. Apolog. i., contra Ruf. et Chryfoftom. de Sacerdot., lib. i. Chryfoftom, in particular, not only jurtifies, but warmly commends, any frauds that can be praftifed for the advantage of the Church of Chriil). Paufanias fays (lib. ix.), that the Hymns of Orpheus were few and (hort; but next in poetical merit to thofe of Homer, and iliperior to them in fanftity (deoXoyiKMTepoL). Thefe are probably the fame as the genuine part of the colleftion now extant; but they are fo intermixed, that it is difficult to fay which are genuine and which are not. Perhaps there is no furer rule for judging than to compare the epithets and allegories with the fymbols and monograms on the Greek medals, and to make their agreement the tell of authenticity. The medals were the public afts and records of the State, made under the direftion of the magiftrates, who were gene- rally initiated into the mylleries. We may therefore be aflured, that whatever theological and mythological allufions are found upon them were part of the ancient religion of Greece. It is from thefe that many of the Orphic Hymns and Fragments are proved to contain the pure theology or myilic faith of the ancients, which is called Orphic by Paufanias (lib. i. , c. 39), and which is fo unlike the vulgar religion, or poetical mythology, that one can fcarcely imagine at firil fight that it belonged to the fame people; but which will neverthelefs appear, upon accurate invelligation, to be the fource from whence it flowed, and the caufe of all its extravagance. The hillory of Orpheus himfelf is fo confufed and obfcured by fable, that it is impoflible to obtain any certain information concerning him. According to general tradition, he was a Thracian, and introduced the mylleries, in which a more pure fyilem of religion was taught, into Greece (Brucker, vol. i., part 2, lib. i., c. i.) He is alfo laid to have travelled into Egypt (Diodor. Sic. lib. i., p. 80); but as the Egyptians pretended that all foreigners received their fciences from them, at a time when all foreigners who entered the country were put to death or enflaved (Diodor. Sic. lib. i., pp. 78 et 107), this account may be rejefted, with many others ot the fame kind. The Egyptians certainly could not have taught Orpheus the plurality of worlds, and true folar fyilem, which appear to have been the fundamental principles of his philofophy and religion (Plutarch, de Placit. Philos., lib. ii., c. 13. 20 ON THE WORSHIP Greeks.^ He is called the Father of Night, becaufe by attradiingthe light to himfelf, and becoming the fountain which distributed it to the world, he produced night, which is called eternally-begotten, becaufe it had eternally exifted, although mixed and loft in the general mafs. He is faid to pervade the world with the motion of his wings, bringing pure light ; and thence to be called the fplendid, the ruling Priapus,and self-illumined {avTavyrjs:'^). It is to beobferved, that the word IlpLi]7ro<;, afterwards the name of a fubordinate deity, is here ufed as a title relating to one of his attributes; the reafons for which I fhall endeavour to explain hereafter. Wings are figura- tively attributed to him as being the emblems of fwiftnefs and incu- bation ; by the firft of which he pervaded matter, and by the fecond fructified the egg of Chaos. The egg was carried in procefiion at the celebration of the myfteries, becaufe, as Plutarch fays, it was the material of generation (yXv tt^'^ r^eveaews;^) containing the feeds and germs of life and motion, without being actually poiTefl^ed of either. For this reafon, it was a very proper fymbol of Chaos, con- taining the feeds and materials of all things, which, however, were barren and ufelefs, until the Creator frudified them by the incuba- tion of his vital fpirit, and releafed them from the reftraints of inert Brucker ifi he. citat. ) Nor could he have gained this knowledge from any people which hiftory has preferved any memorials ; for we know of none among whom fcience had made fuch a progrefs, that a truth fo remote from common obfervation, and fo contradiflory to the evidence of unimproved fenfe, would not have been rejefted, as it was by all the fefts of Greek philofophy except the Pythagoreans, who rather revered it as an article of faith, than underftood it as a difcovery of fcience. Thrace was certainly inhabited by a civilized nation at fome remote period ; for, when Philip of Macedon opened the gold mines in that country, he found that they had been worked before with great expenfe and ingenuity, by a people well verfed in mechanics, of whom no memorials whatever were then extant. Of thefe, pro- bably, was Orpheus, as well as Thamyris, both of whofe poems, Plato fays, could be read with pleafure in his time. * See Sophocl. Qi,Jip. Tyr., ver. 1436. ^ Orph. Hym. 5. 3 Symph. 1. 2. OF PRIAPUS. 21 matter, by the efforts of his divine ftrength. The incubation of the vital fpirit is reprefented on the colonial medals of Tyre, by a fer- pent wreathed around an egg;^ for the ferpent, having the power of carting his fkin, and apparently renewing his youth, became the fymbol of life and vigour, and as fuch is always made an attendant on the mythological deities prefiding over health.'- It is alfo ob- ferved, that animals of the ferpent kind retain life more pertinacioufly than any others except the Polypus, which is fometimes reprefented upon the Greek Medals,^ probably in its ftead. I have myfelf feen the heart of an adder continue its vital motions for many minutes after it has been taken from the body, and even renew them, after it has been cold, upon being moiftened with warm water, and touched with a ftimulus. The Creator, delivering the frud;ified feeds of things from the reftraints of inert matter by his divine ftrength, is reprefented on innumerable Greek medals by the Urus, or wild Bull, in the ad of butting againft the Egg of Chaos, and breaking it with his horns.' It is true, that the egg is not reprefented with the bull on any of thofe which I have feen; but Mr. D'Hancarville"^ has brought examples from other countries, where the fame fyftem prevailed, which, as well as the general analogy of the Greek theology, prove that the egg muft have been underftood, and that the attitude of the bull could have no other meaning. I fhall alfo have occafion here- after to ftiow by other examples, that it was no uncommon pradice, in thefe myftic monuments, to make a part of a group reprefent the whole. It was from this horned fymbol of the power of the 1 See Plate xxi. Fig. i. ~ Macrob. Sat. i. c. 20. 3 See Goltz, Tab. 11. Figs. 7 and 8. "* See Plate IV. Fig. i, and Recherches furies Arts, vol. i. PI. viii. The Hebrew word Ckroub, or Cherub, fignificd originally y/ro//^ or robuji ; but is ufually employed metaphorically, fignifying a Bull. See Cleric, in Exod. c. xxv. ^ Recherches fur les Arts, lib. i. 22 ON THE WORSHIP Deity that horns were placed in the portraits of kings to fhow that their power was derived from Heaven, and acknowledged no earthly fuperior. The moderns have indeed changed the meaning of this fymbol, and given it a fenfe of which, perhaps, it would be difficult to find the origin, though I have often wondered that it has never exercifed the fagacity of thofe learned gentlemen who make Britifh antiquities the fubjefts of their laborious inquiries. At prefent, it certainly does not bear any character of dignity or power ; nor does it ever imply that thofe to whom it is attributed have been parti- cularly favoured by the generative or creative powers. But this is a fubjed much too important to be difcufTed in a digreffion ; I fhall therefore leave it to thofe learned antiquarians who have done themfelves fo much honour, and the public fo much fervice, by their fuccefsful inquiries into cuftoms of the fame kind. To their indefatigable induftry and exquifite ingenuity I earneftly recommend it, only obferving that this modern acceptation of the fymbol is of confiderable antiquity, for it is mentioned as proverbial in the Oneirocritics of Artemidorus ; ^ and that it is not now confined to Great Britain, but prevails in moft parts of Christendom, as the ancient acceptation of it did formerly in moft parts of the world, even among that people from whofe religion Chriftianity is derived ; for it is a common mode of expreflion in the Old Teftament, to fay that the horns of any one fhall be exalted, in order to fignify that he fhall be raifed into power or pre-eminence ; and when Mofes defcended from the Mount with the fpirit of God ftill upon him, his head appeared horned." To the head of the bull was fometimes joined the organ of generation, which reprefented not only the ftrength of the Creator, 1 Lib. i. c. 12. 2 Exod. c. xxxiv.v. 35, ed. Vulgat. Other tranflators underftand the expreffion metaphorically, and Tuppofe it to mean radiated, or luminous. OF PRIAPUS. 23 but the peculiar diredlion of it to the moft beneficial purpofe, the propagation of fenfitive beings. Of this there is a fmall bronze in the Mufeum of Mr. Townley, of which an engraving is given in Plate III. Fig. 1} Sometimes this generative attribute is reprefented by the fymbol of the goat, fuppofed to be the moft falacious of animals, and there- fore adopted upon the fame principles as the bull and the ferpent.'^ The choral odes, fung in honour of the generator Bacchus, were hence called TpaycDSiai, or fongs of the goat ; a title which is now applied to the dramatic dialogues anciently inferted in thefe odes, to break their uniformity. On a medal, ftruck in honour of Auguftus, the goat terminates in the tail of a fifh, to fhow the generative power incorporated with water. Under his feet is the globe of the earth, fuppofed to be fertilifed by this union; and upon his back, the cornucopia, reprefenting the refult of this fertility.^ Mr. D'Hancarville attributes the origin of all thefe fymbols to the ambiguity of words; the fame term being employed in the primitive language to fignify God and a Bull, the Univerfe and a Goat, Life and a Serpent. But words are only the types and fymbols of ideas, and therefore muft be pofterior to them, in the fame manner as ideas are to their objed:s. The words of a primitive language, being imitative of the ideas from which they fprung, and of the objefts they meant to exprefs, as far as the imperfedions of the organs of fpeech will admit, there muft neceftarily be the fame kind of analogy between them as between the ideas and objeds themfelves. It is impoftible, therefore, that in fuch a language any ambiguity of this fort could exift, as it does in fecondary 1 See Plate iii. ^ Tov 8e rpayov acoeOecocrav (o't Aijvmtlol) Kadawep kcl wapa TOi? EWtjai reTLfiija-daL Xerfcai tov YlpiawoVySia to yevmjTiKov p,opLov.'DioDOR.\'ib.\.p."8. 3 Plate X. Fig. 3. 24 ON THE WORSHIP languages ; the words of which, being colleded from various fources,and blended togetherwithout having any natural conneftion, become arbitrary figns of convention, inftead of imitative reprefen- tations of ideas. In this cafe it often happens, that words, fimilar in form, but different in meaning, have been adopted from different fources, which, being blended together, lofe their little difference of form, and retain their entire difference of meaning. Hence ambiguities arife, fuch as thofe above mentioned, which could not poffibly exift in an original tongue. The Greek poets and artifts frequently give the perfonification of a particular attribute for the Deity himfelf ; hence he is called Taf/3o/3oa9, TaypwTTo?, Tau/ao/Aopc^o?,^ &c., and hence the initials and monograms of the Orphic epithets applied to the Creator, are found with the bull, and other fymbols, on the Greek medals.^ It muft not be imagined from hence, that the ancients fuppofed the Deity to exift under the form of a bull, a goat, or a ferpent: on the contrary, he is always defcribed in the Orphic theology as a general pervading Spirit, without form, or diftind locality of any kind; and appears, by a curious fragment preferved by Proclus,^ to have been no other than attratlion perfonified. The felf-created mind {I'oo'i avToo^,^ and the Chorus of Bacchanals in the fame tragedy addrefs him by mafculine and feminine epithets." Ovid alfo fays to him, Tibi, cum fine cornibus adflas, Virgineum caput eft. ^ alluding in the firft line to his taurine, and in the fecond to his androgynous figure. The ancient theologifts were, like the modern, divided into feds; but, as thefe never difturbed the peace of fociety, they have been very little noticed. I have followed what I conceive to be the true Orphic fyftem, in the little analyfis which I have here endeavoured to give. This was probably the true catholic faith, though it differs confiderably from another ancient fyftem,defcribed by Ariftophanes;* which is more poetical, but lefs philofophical. According to this, Chaos,Night,Erebus,andTartarus,were the primitivebeings. Night, in the infinite breaft of Erebus, brought forth an egg, from which fprung Love, who mixed all things together; and from thence fprung the heaven, the ocean, the earth, and the gods. This fyftem is alluded to by the epithet nojevo'?, applied to the Creator in one of the Orphic Litanies:^ but this could never have been a part of the orthodox faith ; for the Creator is ufually reprefented as breaking the egg of chaos, and therefore could not have fprung from it. In the confufed medley of allegories and traditions contained in the Theogony attributed to Hefiod, Love is placed after Chaos and the Earth, but anterior to every thing elfe. Thefe differences are not to be wondered at; for Ariftophanes, fuppofing that he underftood the true fyftem, could not with fafety have revealed it, or even mentioned it any otherwife than under the ufual garb of fidion and 1 Bach. V. 3 5 8. 2 ^ B/30/*ie, Bpofite, UeBcovx^dovof evoat iroTVia. Vers. 504. 3 Metam. lib, iv. v. 18. ^ Opvi6. Vers. 693. ^ Hymn v. OF PRIAPUS. 45 allegory ; and as for the author of the Theogony, it is evident, from the ftrange jumble of incoherent fables which he has put together, that he knew very little of it. The fyftem alluded to in the Orphic verfes quoted in the Argonautics^ is in all probability the true one ; for it is not only confident in all its parts, but contains a phyfical truth, which the greateft of the modern difcoveries has only con- firmed and explained. The others feem to have been only poetical corruptions of it, which, extending by degrees, produced that un- wieldy fyftem of poetical mythology, which conftituted the vulgar religion of Greece. The fauns and fatyrs, which accompany the androgynous figures on the ancient fculptures, are ufually reprefented as miniftering to the Creator by exerting their charafteriftic attributes upon them, as well as upon the nymphs, the paftive agents of procreation : but what has puzzled the learned in thefe monuments, and feems a contradidion to the general fyftem of ancient religion, is that many of thefe groups are in attitudes which are rather adapted to the grati- fication of difordered and unnatural appetites, than to extend pro- creation. But a learned author, who has thrown infinite light upon thefe fubjeds, has effedually cleared them from this fufpicion, by {bowing that they only took the moft convenient way to get at the female organs of generation, in thofe mixed beings who poftefl"ed both. ^ This is confirmed by Lucretius, who aflerts, that this attitude is better adapted to the purpofes of generation than any other." We may therefore conclude, that inftead of reprefenting them in the ad: of gratifying any disorderly appetites, theartifts meant to ftiow their modefty in not indulging their concupifcence, but in doing their duty in the way beft adapted to anfwer the ends propofed by the Creator. On the Greek medals, where the cow is the fymbol of the deity, 1 Recberchei fur les Arts, liv. i. c. 3. "^ Lib. iv. v. 1260. 46 ON THE WORSHIP fhe is frequently reprefented licking a calf, which is fucking her.^ This is probably meant to fhow that the creative power cheriilies and nourillies, as well as generates ; for, as all quadrupeds lick their young, to refrefh and invigorate them immediately after birth, it is natural to fuppofe, according to the general fyftem of fymbolical writing, that this adion fhould be taken as an emblem of the effed it was thought to produce. On other medals the bull or cow is reprefented licking itfelf;- which, upon the fame principle, muft reprefent the ftrength of the deity refrefhed and invigorated by the exertion of its own nutritive and plaftic power upon its own being. On others again is a human head of an androgynous charafter, like that of the Bacchus Sicpv-r)^, with the tongue extended over the lower lip, as if to lick fomething.^ This was probably the fame fymbol, expreffed in a lefs explicit manner; it being the common praftice of the Greek artifts to make a part of a compofition fignify the whole, ofwhich I fhall foon have occafion to give fome inconteftable examples. On a Parian medal publifhed by Goltzius, the bull lick- ing himfelf is reprefented on one fide, accompanied by the afterifk of the fun, and on the other, the head with the tongue extended, having ferpents, the emblems of life, for hair.^ The fame medal is in my coUedion, except that the ferpents are not attached to the head, but placed by it as diftind fymbols, and that the animal lick- ing itfelf is a female accompanied by the initial of the word @eo9, inftead of the afterifk of the fun. Antiquarians have called this head a Medufa; but, had they examined it attentively on any well- preferved coin, they would have found that the expreffion of the features means luft, and not rage or horror.^ The cafe is, that 1 See Plate iv. Fig. 3, from a medal of Dyrrachium, belonging to me. ~ See Plate iii. Fig. 5, from one of Gortyna, in the Hunter Colleftion ; and Plate III. Fig. 4, from one of Parium, belonging to me. 3 See Plate iii. Fig. 4, and Plate in. Fig. 6, from Pellerin. * Goltz. I;i/u/. Tab. xix. Fig. 8. ^ See Plate in. Fig. 4. OF PRIAPUS. 47 antiquarians have been continually led into error, by feeking for explanations of the devices on the Greek medals in the wild and capricious ftories of Ovid's Metamorphojes, inftead of examining the firft principles ofancient religion contained intheOrphic Fragments, the writings of Plutarch, Macrobius, and Apuleius, and the Choral Odes of the Greek tragedies. Thefe principles were the fubjedls of the ancient myfteries, and it is to thefe that the fymbols on the medals always relate ; for they were the public ads of the ftates, and therefore contain the fenfe of nations, and not the caprices of individuals. As M.D'Hancarville found a complete reprefentation of the bull breaking the egg of chaos in the fculptures of the Japanefe, when only a part of it appears on the Greek monuments ; fo we may find in a curious Oriental fragment, lately brought from the facred caverns of Elephanta, near Bombay, a complete reprefentation of the fymbol fo enigmatically exprefTed by the head above mentioned. Thefe caverns are ancient places of worfbip, hewn in the folid rock with immenfe labour and difficulty. That from which the fragment in queftion was brought, is 130 feet long by no wide, adorned with columns and fculptures finifhed in a ftyle very different from that of the Indian artifts.^ It is now negleded ; but others of the fame kind are ftill ufed as places of worfhip by the Hindoos, who can give no account of the antiquity of them, which muft neceffarily be very remote, for the Hindoos are a very ancient people ; and yet the fculptures reprefent a race of men very unlike them, or any of the prefent inhabitants of India. A fpecimen of thefe was brought from the ifland of Elephanta, in the Cumberland man-of-war, and now belongs to the mufeum of Mr. Townley. It contains feveral figures, in very high relief; the principal of which are a man and woman, in an attitude which I fhall not venture to defcribe, but only 1 Archoeol, vol. viii. p. 289. 48 ON THE IVORSHIP obferve, that the adion, which I have Tuppofed to be a fymbol of refrefhment and invigoration, is mutually applied by both to their refpedive organs of generation/ the emblems of the aftive and paflive powers of procreation, which mutually cherifh and invigorate each other. The Hindoos ftill reprefent the creative powers of the deity by thefe ancient fymbols, the male and female organs of generation; and worfhip them with the fame pious reverence as the Greeks and Egyptians did.'^ Like them too they have buried the original prin- ciples of their theology under a mafs of poetical mythology, fo that few of them can give any more perfed account of their faith, than that they mean to worfhip one firft caufe, to whom the fubordinate deitiesare merely agents, or moreproperlyperfonified modes of a(5lion^ This is the doftrine inculcated, and very fully explained, in the Bagvat Geeta; a moral and metaphyfical work lately tranflated from the Sanfcrit language, and faid to have been written upwards of four thoufand years ago. Krefhna, or the deity become incarnate in the fhape of man, in order to inftrud all mankind, is introduced, revealing to his difciples the fundamental principles of true faith, religion, and wifdom ; which are the exad: counterpart of the fyftem of emanations, fo beautifully defcribed in the lines of Virgil before cited. We here find, though in a more myftic garb, the fame one principle of life univerfally emanated and expanded, and ever par- tially returning to be again abforbed in the infinite abyfs of intelledlual being. This reabforption, which is throughout recommended as the ultimate end of human perfeftion, can only be obtained by a life of inward meditation and abftra(fl thought, too fteady to be interrupted by any worldly incidents, or difturbed by any tranfitory affed:ions,whether of mind or body. But as fuch a life is not in the 1 See Plate xi. ^ Sonnerat, Voyage aux Indes, T. I. p. 1 80. 3 Niebuhr, Voyages, vol. 11. p. 17. OF PRIJPUS. 49 power of any but a Brahman, inferior rewards, confifting of gradual advancements durintj; the tranfmigrations oi the foul, are held out to the foldier, the huOundman, and mechanic, accordingly as they fulfill the duties of their feveral ftations. Even thofe who ferve other G;ods are not excluded from the benefits awarded to every moral virtue; for, as the divine Teacher fays, If they do it with a firm belief, in Jo doing they involuntarily worjhip even me. 1 am he who partaketh of all worjhip, and I am their reward} This uni- verfal deity, being the caufe of all motion, is alike the caufe of creation, prefervation, and deftru(5lion ; which three attributes are all expreffed in the myftic fy liable om. To repeat this in filence, with firm devotion, and immoveable attention, is the fureft means of perfedion,^ and confequent reabforption, fince it leads to the contemplation oftheDeity, in his three great characfleriftic attributes. Thefirftandgreateft of thefe, the creative or generative attribute, feefns to have been originally reprefented by the union of the male and female organs of generation,which, under the title of the iJngam, ftill occupies the central and moft interior recefies of their temples or pagodas ; and is alfo worn, attached to bracelets, round their necks and arms.' In a little portable temple brought from the Rohilla country during the late war,and now in theBritifh Mufeum, this compofition appears mounted on a pedeftal, in the midft of a fquare area, funk in a block of white alabafter.' Round the pedeftal is a ferpent, the emblem of life, with his head refted upon his tail, to denote eternity, or the conftant return of time upon itfelt, whilft it flows through perpetual duration, in regular revolutions and ftated periods. From under the body of the ferpent fprings the lotus or water lily, the Nelumbo of Linnaeus, which overfpreads the whole of the area not occupied by the figures at the corners. 1 Bagvat Geeta, p. 8l. 2 Ihid. p. 74. 3 Sonnerat, l^oyage aux Indes, liv. ii. p. 180. Planche liv. •* See Plate xii. H so ON THE WORSHIP This plant grows in the water, and, amongft its broad leaves, puts forth a flower, in the centre of which is formed the feed-vefl'el, fhaped like a bell or inverted cone, and punctuated on the top with little cavities or cells, in which the feeds grow/ The orifices of thefe cells being too fmall to let the feeds drop out when ripe, they flioot forth into new plants, in the places where they were formed ; the bulb of the vefl^el ferving as a matrice to nourilh them, until they acquire fuch a degree of magnitude as to burft it open and releafe themfelves ; after which, like other aquatic weeds, they take root wherever the current depofits them. This plant therefore, being thus produCtiveofitfelf, and vegetating from its own matrice, without being foftered in the earth, was naturally adopted as the fymbol of the productive power of the waters, upon which the aftive fpirit of the Creator operated in giving life and vegetation to matter. We accordingly find it employed in every part of the northern hemifphere, where the fymbolical religion, improperly called idolatry, does or ever did prevail. The facred images of the Tartars, Japonefe, and Indians, are almoft all placed upon it; of which numerous infl:ances occur in the publications of Kaempfer, Chappe D'Auteroche, and Sonnerat. The upper part of the bafe of the Lingam alfo confifl:s of this flower, blended and compofed with the female organ of generation which it fupports : and the ancient author of the Bagvat Geeta fpeaks of the creator Brahma as fitting upon his lotus throne.^ The figures of Ifis, upon the Ifiac Table, hold the fl:em of this plant, furmounted by the feed- vefl'el in one hand, and the crofs,^ reprefenting the male organs of generation, in the other ; thus fignifying the univerfal power, both adive and paflive, attributed to that goddefs. On the fame Ifiac Table is alfo the reprefentation of an Egyptian temple, the columns of which are exadly like the plant which Ifis holds in her hand, 1 See Plate xx. Fig. i. ^ Page 91. 3 See Plate xviil. Fig. 2, from Pignorius. OF PRI APUS. 51 except that the ftem is made larger, in order to give it that ftability which is neceflary to fupport a roof and entablature.^ Columns and capitals of the fame kind are ftill exifting, in great numbers, among the ruins of Thebes, in Egypt; and more particularly upon thofe very curious ones in the ifland of Philae, on the borders of Ethiopia, which are, probably, the moft ancient monuments of art now extant; at leaft, if we except the neighbouring temples of Thebes. Both were certainly built when that city was the feat of wealth and empire, which it was, even to a proverb, during the Trojan war.^ How long it had then been fo, we can form no con- jedure; but that it foon after declined, there can be little doubt; for, when the Greeks, in the reign of Pfammeticus (generally computed to have been about 530 years after the Siege of Troy), firft became perfonally acquainted with the interior parts of that country, Memphis had been for many ages its capital, and Thebes was in a manner deferted. Homer makes Achilles fpeak of its immenfe wealth and grandeur, as a matter generally known and acknowledged; fo that it muft have been of long eftablifhed fame, even in that remote age. We may therefore fairly conclude, that the greateft part of the fuperb edifices now remaining, were executed, or at leaft begun, before that time; many of them being fuch as could not have been finiftied, but in a long term of years, even if we fuppofe the wealth and power of the ancient kings of Egypt to have equalled that of the greateft of the Roman emperors. The finiftiing of Trajan's column in three years, has been juftly thought a very extraordinary effort ; for there muft have been, at leaft, three hundred good fculptors employed upon it: and yet, in the neighbourhood of Thebes, we find whole temples of enormous magnitude, covered with figures carved in the hard and brittle granite of the Libyan mountains, inftead of the foft marbles of ' See Plate xviii. Fig. i, from Pignorius. ^ Horn. Iliati. i, ver. 381. 5^ ON THE WORSHIP Paros and Carrara. Travellers, who have vifited that country have given us imperfeft accounts of the manner in which they are finifhed; but, if one may judge by thofe upon the obelifc of Ram- efes, now lying in fragments at Rome, they are infinitely more laboured than thofe of Trajan's Column. An eminent fculptor, with whom I examined that obelifc, was decidedly of opinion, that they muft have been finifhed in the manner of gems, with a grav- ing tool ; it appearing Impoffible for a chifel to cut red granite with fo much neatnefs and precifion. The age of Ramefes is uncertain ; but the generality of modern chronologers fuppofe that he was the fame perfon as Sefoftris, and reigned at Thebes about 1500 years before the Chriftian sera, and about 300 before the Siege of Troy. Their dates are however merely conjectural, when applied to events of this remote antiquity. The Egyptian priefts of the Auguftan age had a tradition, which they pretended to confirm by records, written in hieroglyphics, that their country had once poffeft the dominion of all Afia and Ethiopia, which their king Ramfes, or Ramefes, had conquered.'^ Though this account may be exagge- rated, there can be no doubt, from the buildings fl:ill remaining, but that they were once at the head of a great empire; for all hif- torians agree that they abhorred navigation, had no fea-port, and never enjoyed the benefits of foreign commerce, without which, Egypt could have no means of acquiring a fufficient quantity of fuperfluous wealth to eredfuch expenfive monuments, unlefs from tributary provinces ; efpecially if all the lower part of it was an uncultivated bog, as Herodotus, with great appearance of prob- ability, tells us it anciently was. Yet Homer, who appears to have known all that could be known in his age, and tranfmitted to pof- terity all he knew, feems to have heard nothing of their empire or conquefts. Thefe were obliterated and forgotten by the rife of 1 Tacit. An/i. lib. ii. c. 60. OF PR UP US. S3 new empires; but the renown of their ancient wealth ftill con- tinued, and afforded a familiar objed of comparifon, as that of the Mogul does at this day, though he is become one of the pooreft fovereigns in the world. But far as thefe Egyptian remains lead us into unknown ages, the fymbols they contain appear not to have been invented in that country, but to have been copied from thofe of fome other people, ftill anterior, who dwelt on the other fide of the Erythraean ocean. One of the moft obvious of them is the hooded fnake, which is a reptile peculiar to the fouth-eaftern parts of Afia, but which I found reprefented, with great accuracy, upon the obelifc of Ramefes, and have alfo obferved frequently repeated on the Ifiac Table, and other fymbolical works of the Egyptians. It is alfo diftinguifhable among the fculptures in the facred caverns of the ifland ot Ele- phanta ; ^ and appears frequently added, as a charafteriftic fymbol, to many of the idols of the modern Hindoos, whofe abfurd tales concerning its meaning are related at length by M. Sonnerat ; but they are not worth repeating. Probably we fhould be able to trace the connexion through many more inftances, could we obtain accu- rate drawings of the ruins of Upper Egypt. By comparing the columns which the Egyptians formed in imitation of the Nelumbo plant, with each other, and obferving their different modes of decorating them, we may difcover the origin of that order of architedure which the Greeks called Corin- thian, from the place of its fuppofed invention. We firft find the plain bell, or feed-vefTel, ufed as a capital, without any further alter- ation than being a little expanded at bottom, to give it {lability. '■^ In the next inftance, the fame feed-veflel is furrounded by the leaves of fome other plant ;^ which is varied in different capitals according 1 Niehuhr, Voyage, vol. ii. ^ See Plate xix. Fig. 6, from Norden. 3 See Plate xix. Fig. 7, Worn Norden. 54 ON THE IVORSHIP to the different meanings intended to be expreffed by thefe addi- tional fymbols. The Greeks decorated it in the fame manner, with the leaves of the acanthus, and other forts of foliage ; whilft various other fymbols of their religion were introduced as ornaments on the entablature, inftead of being carved upon the walls of the cell, or fhafts of the columns. One of thefe, which occurs moft frequently, is that which the architeds call the honey-fuckle, but which, as Sir Jofeph Banks (to whom I am indebted for all that I have faid con- cerning the Lotus) clearly fhewed me,muft be meant for the young fhoots of this plant, viewed horizontally, juft when they have burft the feed-veffel, and are upon the point of falling out of it. The ornament is varioufly compofed on different buildings ; it being the pradice of the Greeks to make vegetable, as well as animal mon- fters, by combining different fymbolical plants together, and blend- ing them into one; whence they are often extremely difficult to be difcovered. But the fpecimen I have given, is fo ftrongly charader- ifed, that it cannot eafily be miftaken.^ It appears on many Greek medals with the animal fymbols and perfonified attributes of the Deity; which firft led me to imagine that it was not a mere orna- ment, but had fome myftic meaning, as almoft every decoration employed upon their facred edifices indifputably had. The fquare area, over which the Lotus is fpread, in the Indian monument before mentioned, was occafionally floated with water; which, by means of a forcing machine, was firft thrown in a fpout upon the Lingam. The pouring of water upon the facred fymbols, is a mode of worfhip very much pradifed by the Hindoos, par- ticularly in their devotions to the Bull and the Lingam. Its mean- ing has been already explained, in the infl:ance of the Greek figure of Pan, reprefented in the ad: of paying the fame kind of worffiip to the fymbol of his own procreative power.^ The areas of the 1 Plate XIX. Fig. 3, from the Ionian Antiquities, Ch. ii. PI. xiii. 2 See Plate v. Fig. 1. OF PRIAPUS. 55 Greek temples were, in like manner, in fome inftances, floated with water; of which I fliall foon give an example. We alfo find, not unfrequently, little portable temples, nearly of the fame form, and of Greek workmanfliip : the areas of which were equally floated by means of a fountain in the middle, and which, by the figures in relief that adorn the fides, appear evidently to have been dedicated to the fame worfhip of Priapus, or the Lingam} The fquare area is likewife imprefled upon many ancient Greek medals, fometimes divided into four, and fometimes into a greater number of com- partments." Antiquarians have fuppofed this to be merely the im- preflion of fomething put under the coin, to make it receive the fl:roke of the die more fl:eadily ; but, befides that it is very ill adapted to this purpofe, we find many coins which appear, evidently, to have received the fl:roke of the hammer (for fl:riking with a balance is of late date) on the fide marked with this fquare. But what puts the quefliion out of all doubt, is, that impreflions of exadlly the fame kind are found upon the little Talifmans, or myfliic pafi:es, taken out of the Egyptian Mummies, which have no imprefiion whatever on the reverfe.'' On a little brafs medal of Syracufe, \ye alfo find the afterifc of the Sun placed in the centre of the fquare, in the fame manner as the Lingam is on the Indian monument.'^ Whv this quadrangular form was adopted, in prefer- ence to any other, we have no means of difcovering, from any known Greek or Egyptian fculptures; but from this little Indian temple, we find that the four corners were adapted to four of the 1 See Plate xiv. from one in the colleftion of Mr. Townley. 2 See Plate xiii. Fig. i, from one of Sclinus, and Fig. 3, from one of Syracufe, belonging to me. 3 See Plate xiii. Fig. 2, from one in the colleftion of Mr. Townley, ^ See Plate XIII. Fig. 3. The medal is extremely common, and the quadrangular imprefTion is obfcrvable upon a great number of the more ancient Greek medals, gene- rally with fome fymbol of the Deity in the centre. See thofe of Athens, Lyttus, Maronea, &c. 56 ON 'THE WORSHIP fubordinate deities, or perfonified modes of aftion of the great uni- verfal Generator, reprefented by the fymbol in the middle, to which the others are reprefented as paying their adorations, with geftures of humility and refped/ What is theprecife meaning of thefe four fymbolical figures, it is fcarcely pofTible for us to difcover, from the fmall fragments of the myftic learning of the ancients which are now extant. That they were however intended as perfonified attributes, we can have no doubt; for we are taught by the venerable authority of the Bagvat Geeta^ that all the fubordinate deities were fuch, or elfe canonifed men, which thefe figures evidently are not. As for the mythological tales now current in India, they throw the fame degree of light upon the fubjed, as Ovid's Metamorphofes do on the ancient theology of Greece; that is, juft enough to bewilder and perplex thofe who give up their attention to it. The ancient author before cited is deferving of more credit ; but he has faid very little upon the fymbolical worfhip. His work, neverthelefs, clearly proves that its principles were precifely the fame as thofe of the Greeks and Egyptians, among whofe remains of art or literature, we may, perhaps, find fome probable analogies to aid conjedure. The elephant is, however, a new fymbol in the weft ; the Greeks never having feen one of thofe animals before the expedition of Alexander,- although the ufe of ivory was familiar among them even in the days of Homer. Upon this Indian monument the head of the elephant is placed upon the body of a man with four hands, two of which are held up as prepared to ftrike with the in- ftruments they hold, and the other two pointed down as in adora- tion of the Lingam. This figure is called Gonnis and Pollear by the modern Hindoos ; but neither of thefe names is to be found in the Geeta, where the deity only fays, that the learned behold him 1 See Plate xii. ^ Paufan. lib. i. c. 12. OF PRIAPVS. 57 alike in the reverend Brahman -perfected in knowledge^ in the ox, and in the elephant. What peculiar attributes the elephant was meant to exprefs, the ancient writer has not told us ; but, as the charaderiftic properties of this animal are ftrength and fagacity, we may conclude that his image was intended to reprefent ideas fomewhat fimilar to thofe which the Greeks reprefented by that of Minerva, who was worfhipped as the goddefs of force and wifdom, of war and counfel. The Indian Gonnis is indeed male, and Minerva female; but this difference of fexes, however important it may be in phyfical, is of very little confequence in metaphyseal beings, Minerva being, like the other Greek deities, either male or female, or both.^ On the medals of the Ptolemies, under whom the Indian fymbols became familiar to the Greeks through the commerce of Alexandria, we find her repeatedly repre- fented with the elephant's fkin upon her head, inftead of a helmet; and with a countenance between male and female, fuch as the artift would naturally give her, when he endeavoured to blend the Greek and Indian fymbols, and mould them into one.'"^ Minerva is faid by the Greek mythologifts to have been born without a mother, from the head of Jupiter, who was delivered of her by the afiiftance of Vulcan. This, in plain language, means no more than that Hie was a pure emanation of the divine mind, operating by means of the univerfal agent fire, and not, like others of the allegorical per- fonages, fprung from any of the particular operations of the deity upon external matter. Hence fhe is faid to be next in dignity to her father, and to be endowed with all his attributes -^ for, as wifdom is the mofi: exalted quality of the mind, and the divine mind the perfedion of wifdom, all its attributes are the attributes of wifdom, ' Kpaev KUL 6t]\v^ e(f>v<;. Orph. et See Plate xv. Fig. i, b — b. OF PRIAPUS. 65 been occafionally floated with water, the drains and conduits being ftill to be feen/ as alfo feveral fragments of fculpture reprefenting waves, ferpents, and various aquatic animals, which once adorned the bafement." The Bacchus 7repLKiovio<; here worfhipped, was, as we learn from the Orphic hymn above cited, the fun in his charader of extinguifher of the fires which once pervaded the earth. This he was fuppofed to have done by exhaling the waters of the ocean, and fcattering them over the land, which was thus fuppofed to have acquired its proper temperature and fertility. For this reafon the facred fire, the effential image of the god, was furrounded by the element which was principally employed in giving effed: to the beneficial exertions of his great attribute. Thefe Orphic temples were, without doubt, emblems of that fundamental principle of the myftic faith of the ancients, the folar fyftem ; fire, the efience of the deity, occupying the place of the fun, and the columns furrounding it as the fubordinate parts of the univerfe. Remains of the worfhip of fire continued among the Greeks even to the laft, as appears from the facred fires kept in the interior apartment, or holy of holies, of almoft all their temples, and places of worfhip: and, though the Ammonian Platonics, the lafl profefTors of the ancient religion, endeavoured to conceive fome- thing beyond the reach of fenfe and perception, as the efTence of their fupreme god; yet, when they wanted to illufhrate and explain the modes of aftion of this metaphyfical abftradion, who was more fubtle than intelligence itfelf, they do it by images and compa- rifons of light and fire.'^ From a paffage of Hecataeus, preferved by Diodorus Siculus, I think it is evident that Stonehenge, and all the other monuments of the fame kind found in the North, belonged to the fame religion, 1 See Plate xv. Fig. i, c — r. 2 See Plate xvn. Fig. i. 3 See Proclus in Theol. Platon. lib. i. c. 19. K 66 ON THE JVORSHIP which appears, at fome remote period, to have prevailed over the whole northern hemifphere. According to that ancient hiftorian, the Hyperboreans inhabited an ijland beyond Gaul, as large as Sicily^ in which Apollo was worjhipped in a circular temple confider able for its fixe and riches} Apollo, we know, in the language of the Greeks of that age, can mean no other than the fun, which, according to Cfefar, was worshipped by the Germans, when they knew of no other deities except fire and the moon.^ The ifland I think can be no other than Britain, which at that time was only known to the Greeks by the vague reports of Phoenician mariners, fo uncertain and obfcure, that Herodotus, the moft inquifitive and credulous of hiftorians, doubts of its exiftence.^ The circular temple of the fun being noticed in fuch flight and imperfeft accounts, proves that it muft have been fomething fingular and important ; for, if it had been an inconfiderable ftrudure, it would not have been mentioned at all ; and, if there had been many fuch in the country, the hiftorian would not have employed the fingular number. Stonehenge has certainly been a circular temple, nearly the fame as that already defcribed of the Bacchus TreptKiovio^ at Puzzuoli, except that in the latter the nice execution, and beautiful fymmetry of the parts, are in every refped the reverfe of the rude but majeftic fimplicity of the former ; in the original defign they differ but in the form of the area.* It may therefore be reafonably fuppofed, that we have ^'Naov a^ioXoyov^avaOrj/jiaat TroXXot? KeKO(T/xr)/jb€VOV^(r^atpoeiBr) rmaxni^o,'^'" Diod. Sic. lib. ii. ^De B. Gal. lib. vi. ^ Lib. iii. c. 15. 4 See Plate xv. Fig. 2 and 3. I have preferred Webb's plan of Stonehenge to Stukeley's and Smith's, after comparing each with the ruins now exifling. They differ materially only in the cell, which Webb fuppofes to have been a hexagon, and Stukeley a feftion of an ellipfis. The pofition of the altar is merely conjeftural; wherefore I have omitted it ; and I much doubt whether either be right in their plans of the cell, which feems, as in other Druidical temples, to have been meant for a circle, but incorreftly executed. OF PRIJPUS. 67 ftill the ruins of the identical temple defcribed by Hecataeus, who, being an Afiatic Greek, might have received his information from fome Phoenician merchant, who had vifited the interior parts of Britain when trading there for tin. Macrobius mentions a temple of the fame kind and form upon Mount Zilmilfus in Thrace, de- dicated to the fun under the title of Bacchus Sebazius/ The large obelifcs of ftone found in many parts of the North, fuch as thofe at Rudftone,'^ and near Boroughbridge in Yorkfhire,^ belong to the fame religion; obelifcs being, as Pliny obferves, facred to the fun, whofe rays they reprefented both by their form and name.* An ancient medal of Apollonia in Illyria, belonging to the Mufeum of the late Dr. Hunter, has the head of Apollo crowned with laurel on one fide, and on the other an obelifc terminating in a crofs, the leaft explicit reprefentation of the male organs of generation.^ This has exadly the appearance of one of thofe crofTes, which were ereded in church-yards and crofs roads for the adoration of devout perfons, when devotion was more prevalent than at prefent. Many of thefe were undoubtedly ereded before the eftablifhment of Chriftianity, and converted, together with their worfhippers, to the true faith. Anciently they reprefented the generative power of light, the effence of God ; for God is lights and never but in iin- approached light dwelt from eternity^ fays Milton, who in this, as well as many other inftances,has followed the Ammonian Platonics, who were both the restorers and corrupters of the ancient theology. They reftored it from the mafs of poetical mythology, under which it was buried, but refined and fublimated it with abftrad meta- phyiics, which foared as far above human reafon as the poetical 1 Sat. lib. i. c. 18. ^ Archceologia, vol. v. 3 Now called the Devil's Arrows. See Stukeley's Itin. vol. i. Table xc. < Hijl. Nat. lib. xxxvi. fee. 14. ^ Plate X. Fig. i, and Numrni Pop. ^ Urb. Table x. Fig. 7. 68 ON THE WORSHIP mythology funk below it. From the ancient folar obelifcs came the fpires and pinnacles with which our churches are ftill decorated, fo many ages after their myftic meaning has been forgotten. Happily for the beauty of thefe edifices, it was forgotten ; other- wife the reformers of the laft century would have deflroyed them, as they did the croffes and images ; for they might with equal propriety have been pronounced heathenifh and prophane. As the obelifc was the fymbol of light, fo was the pyramid of fire, deemed to be eflentially the fame. The Egyptians, among whom thefe forms are the moft frequent, held that there were two oppofite powers in the world, perpetually ading contrary to each other, the one creating, and the other destroying : the former they called Ofiris, and the latter Typhon.^ By the contention of thefe two, that mixture of good and evil, which, according to fome verfes of Euripides quoted by Plutarch," conftituted the harmony of the world, was fuppofed to be produced. This opinion of the necefTary mixture of good and evil was, according to Plutarch, of immemorial antiquity, derived from the oldeft theologifts and legillators, not only in traditions and reports, but in myfteries and facrifices, both Greek and barbarian.^ Fire was the efficient principle of both, and, according to fome of the Egyptians, that Eetherial fire which concentred in the fun. This opinion Plutarch controverts, faying that Typhon, the evil or defl:roying power, was a terrefl:rial or material fire, eflentially different from the ^therial. But Plutarch here argues from his own prejudices, rather than from the evidence of the cafe ; for he believed in an original evil principle coeternal with the good, and ading in per- petual oppofition to it; an error into which men have been led by forming falfe notions of good and evil, and confidering them as 1 Plutarch, de Is. iff Os. ~ Ibid., p. 455, Ed. Reiflcii. 3 Ibid., Ed. Reilkii. OF PRIAPUS. 69 felf-exifting inherent properties, inftead of accidental modifications, variable with every circumftance with which caufes and events are conneded. This error, though adopted by individuals, never formed a part either of the theology or mythology of Greece. Homer, in the beautiful allegory of the two cafks, makes Jupiter, the fupreme god, the diftributor of both good and evil.' The name of Jupiter, Zeuvt]^, or creator of both fexes, known by the effeminate mold of his limbs and coun- tenance; and on the other, a tiger, leaping up, and devouring the grapes which fpring from the body of the perfonified vine, the hands of which are employed in receiving another clufler from the Bacchus. This compofition reprefents the vine between the crea- ting and defliroying attributes of god; the one giving it fruit, and the other devouring it when given. The tiger has a garland of ivy round his neck, to fhow that the defi:royer was co-eflential with the creator, of whom ivy, as well as all other ever-greens, was an emblem reprefenting his perpetual youth and viridity.^ The mutual and alternate operation of the two great attributes of creation and defl:ru<5tion, was not confined by the ancients to plants and animals, and fuch tranfitory productions, but extended to the univerfe itfelf. Fire being the eflential caufe of both, they believed that the conflagration and renovation of the world were periodical and regular, proceeding from each other by the laws of its own confliitution, implanted in it by the creator, who was alfo the deftroyer and renovator f for, as Plato fays, all things arife from one, and into one are all things refolved.* It muft be obferved, that, when the ancients fpeak of creation and deftru6lion, they mean only formation and difTolution; it being univerfally allowed, through all fyftems of religion, or feds of philofophy, that nothing could come from nothings and that no power whatever could annihilate that 1 See Plate xxi. Fig. 7. 2 Strabo, lib. xv. p. 712. 3 Brucker, Hi/i. Crit. Philof. vol. i. part 2, lib. i. Plutarch, de Placit. Philof. lib. ii. c. 18. Lucretius, lib. v. ver. 92. Cic. de Nat. Deor. lib. ii. ^ l£j^ kvooi. Kai %epcri yStarat, TrepiyXcoaaoi r' £cf)VP. Pindar. Pytb. i. ver. 79. Paffages to the fame purpofe occur in almoil every page of the Iliad 2.nd OdyJJey. '' Levit. ch. xvii. ver. 11 & 14. OF PRIAPUS. 99 by Ulyfles ;' by which their faculties were renewed by a reunion with the divine emanation, from which they had been feparatcd. The foul of Tirefias is faid to be entire in hell, and to poflefs alone the power of perception, becaufe with him this divine emanation ftill remained. The fhade of Hercules is defcribed among the other ghofts, though he himfelf, as the poet fays, was then in heaven ; that is, the adive principle of thought and perception returned to its native heaven, whilft the paffive, or merely fenfitive, remained on earth, from whence it fprung.'- The final feparation of thefe two did not take place till the body was confumed by fire, as appears from the ghoft of Elpenor, whofe body being ftill entire, he retained both, and knew Ulyfles before he had tafted of the blood. It was from producing this feparation, that the univerfal Bacchus, or double Apollo, the creator and deftroyer, whofe eflence was fire, was alfo called At/cwr?;?, the purifier,-' by a metaphor taken from the winnow, which purified the corn from the duft and chaff, as fire purified the foul from its terreftrial pollutions. Hence this inftrument is called by Virgil the myftic winnow of Bacchus.* The Ammonian Platonics and Gnoftic Chriftians thought that this feparation, or purification, might be effefted in a degree even before death. It was for this purpofe that they pradifed fuch rigid temperance, and gave themfelves up to fuch intenfe ftudy ; for, by fubduing and extenuating the terreftrial principle, they hoped to give liberty and vigour to the celeftial, fo that it might beenabled to afcend diredly to the intelleftual world,pure andunincumbered.'' ' OdyJJ'. \, ver. 152. ' Thofe who wifh to lee the difference between fenfation and perception clearly and fully explained, may be fatisfied by reading the EJ/ai aualytique fur P Ame, by Mr. Bonnet. Orph. Hymn. 45. ■" Myjlica vannus lacchi. Georg. i. ver. 166. ' Plotin. Ennead. vi. lib. iv. ch. 16. Moflieim, Not. y in Cudw. Syjl. Inteli ch. V. fedt. 20. loo ON THE WORSHIP The clergy afterwards introduced Purgatory, inftead of abftrad meditation and ftudy ; which was the ancient mode of feparation by fire, removed into an unknown country, where it was faleable to all fuch of the inhabitants of this world as had fufficient wealth and credulity. It was the celeftial or setherial principle of the human mind, which the ancient artifts reprefented under the fymbol of the butterfly, which may be confidered as one of the moft elegant alle- gories of their elegant religion. This infedl, when hatched from the egg, appears in the fhape of a grub, crawling upon the earth, and feeding upon the leaves of plants. In this fliate, it was aptly made the emblem of man, in his earthly form, in which the aetherial vigour and adivity of the celeflial foul, the divine particula mentis, was fuppofed to be clogged and incumbered with the material body. When the grub was changed to a chryfalis, its ftillnefs, torpor, and infenfibility feemed to prefent a natural image of death, or the inter- mediate fliate between the cefl^ation of the vital fundions of the body and the final releafement of the foul by the fire, in which the body was confumed. The butterfly breaking from the torpid chryfalis, and mounting in the air, was no lefs natural an image of the celeftial foul burfting from the reftraints of matter, and mixing again with its native aether. The Greek artifts, always ftudious of elegance, changed this, as well as other animal fymbols, into a human form, retaining the wings as the charaderiftic members, by which the meaning might be known. The human body, which they added to them, is that of a beautiful girl, fometimes in the age of infancy, and fometimes of approaching maturity. So beautiful an allegory as this would naturally be a favourite fubjed of art among a people whofe tafte had attained the utmoft pitch of refine- ment. We accordingly find that it has been more frequently and more varioufly repeated than any other which the fyftem of emana- tions, fo favourable to art, could afford. OF PRIAPUS. loi Although all men were fuppofed to partake of the divine emanation in a degree, it was not fuppofed that they all partook of it in an equal degree. Thofe who (howed fuperior abilities, and diftinguifhed themfelves by their fplendid actions, were fuppofed to have a larger fhare of the divine eflence, and were therefore adored as gods, and honoured with divine titles, expreifive of that parti- cular attribute of the deity with which they feemed to be moft favoured. New perfonages were thus enrolled among the alle- gorical deities; and the perfonified attributes of the fun were con- founded with a Cretan and TheiTalian king, an Afiatic conqueror, and a Theban robber. Hence Pindar, who appears to have been a very orthodox heathen, fays, that the race of men and gods is one, that both breathe from one mother, and only differ in power.^ This confufion of epithets and titles contributed, as much as any thing, to raife that vaft and extravagant fabric of poetical mytho- logy, which, in a manner, overwhelmed the ancient theology, which was too pure and philofophical to continue long a popular religion. The grand and exalted fyftem of a general firft caufe, univerfally expanded, did not fuit the grofs conceptions of the multitude; who had no other way of conceiving the idea of an omnipotent god, but by forming an exaggerated image of their own defpot, and fuppofing his power to confift in an unlimited gratification of his paffions and appetites. Hence the univerfal Jupiter, the aweful and venerable, the general principle of life and motion, was transformed into the god who thundered from Mount Ida, and was lulled to fleep in the embraces of his wife; and hence the god whofe fpirit moved" upon the face of the waters, 1 Nem. V. ver. i . ^ So the tranflators have rendered the expreflion of the original, which literally means brooding as a fowl on its eggs, and alludes to the fymbols of the ancient theology, which I have before obferved upon. See Patrick's Commentary.. I02 ON "THE WORSHIP and impregnated them with the powers of generation, became a great king above all gods, who led forth his people to fmite the ungodly, and rooted out their enemies from before them. Another great means of corrupting the ancient theology, and eftablifhing the poetical mythology, was the pradtice of the artifts in reprefenting the various attributes of the creator under human forms of various character and expreffion. Thefe figures, being diftinguifhed by the titles of the deity which they were meant to reprefent, became in time to be confidered as diftind perfonages, and worfhipped as feparate fubordinate deities. Hence the many- fhaped god, the ttoXu/ao/j^o? and fivpio/xop(f)0'; of the ancient theo- logifts, became divided into many gods and goddeffes, often de- fcribed by the poets as at variance with each other, and wrangling about the little intrigues and paffions of men. Hence too, as the fymbols were multiplied, particular ones loft their dignity ; and that venerable one which is the fubjed; of this difcourfe, became degraded from the reprefentative of the god of nature to a fubordinate rural deity, a fuppofed fon of the Afiatic conqueror Bacchus, ftanding among the nymphs by a fountain,^ and exprefting the fertility ot a garden, inftead of the general creative power of the great adlive principle of the univerfe. His degradation did not ftop even here ; for we find him, in times ftill more prophane and corrupt, made a fubjed of raillery and infult, as anfwering no better purpofe than holding up his rubicund fnout to frighten the birds and thieves.^ H is talents were alfo perverted from their natural ends, and employed in bafeand abortive efforts in conformity to the tafte of the times; for men naturally attribute their own paffions and inclinations to the objeds of their adoration; and as God made man in his own image, fo man returns the favour, and makes God in his. Hence we find the higheft attribute of the all-pervading fpirit and firft- ' Theocrit. Idyll, i. ver. 21. ^ Horat. lib. i. Sat. viii. Virg. Georg. iv. OF PRIAPUS. 103 begotten love foully proftituted to promifcuous vice, and calling out, H^c cunnum^ caput hie, pr^beat ille nates? He continued however ftill to have his temple, prieftefs and facred geefe,'"^ and offerings of the moft exquifite kind were made to him : Criflabitque tibi excuflis. pulcherrima lumbis Hoc anno primum cxperta puella virum. Sometimes, however, they were not fo fcrupulous in the feledlion of their vidims, but fuffered frugality to reftrain their devotion : Cum iacrum fieret Deo falaci Condufta ell pretio puella parvo/ The bride was ufually placed upon him immediately before mar- riage ; not, as Lacflantius fays, ut ejus pudicitiam prior Deus pra- libajfe videatur^ but that fhe might be rendered fruitful by her communion with the divine nature, and capable of fulfilling the duties of her ftation. In an ancient poem* we find a lady of the name of Lalageprefentingthe pictures of the " Elephantis" to him, and gravely requefting that fhe might enjoy the pleafures over which he particularly prefided, in all the attitudes defcribed in that celebrated treatife.'' Whether or not fhe fucceeded, the poet has not informed us ; but we may fafely conclude that fhe did not truft wholly to faith and prayer, but, contrary to the ufual practice of modern devotees, accompanied her devotion with fuch good works as were likely to contribute to the end propofed by it. When a lady had ferved as the vi(!l:im in a facrifice to this god, fhe expreffed her gratitude for the benefits received, by offering upon his altar certain fmall images reprefenting his charaderiflic ' Priap. Carm. 21. * Petron. Satyric. ' Priap. Carm. 34. * Priap. Carm. 3. ' The Elephantis was written by one Philcenis, and feems to have been o^ the fame kind with the Puttana errante of Aretin. I04 ON THE WORSHIP attribute, the number of which was equal to the number of men who had aded as priefts upon the occafion/ On an antique gem, in the colleftion of Mr. Townley, is one of thefe fair viftims, who appears juft returned from a facrifice of this kind, and devoutly- returning her thanks by offering upon an altar fome of thefe images, from the number of which one may obferve that fhe has not been neglefted.'^ This offering of thanks had alfo its myftic and allegorical meaning ; for fire being the energetic principle and effential force of the Creator, and the fymbol above mentioned the vifible image of his charadleriftic attribute, the uniting them was uniting the material with the effential caufe, from whofe joint operation all things were fuppofed to proceed. Thefe facrifices, as well as all thofe to the deities prefiding over generation, were performed by night: hence Hippolytus, in Euri- pides, fays, to exprefs his love of chaftity, that he likes none of the gods revered by night.^ Thefe adis of devotion were indeed attended with fuch rites as muft naturally fhock the prejudices of a chafte and temperate mind, not liable to be warmed by that ecftatic enthufiafm which is peculiar to devout perfons when their attention is abforbed in the contemplation of the beneficent powers of the Creator, and all their faculties direded to imitate him in the exertion of his great charafteriftic attribute. To heighten this enthufiafm, the male and female faints of antiquity ufed to lie pro- mifcuoufly together in the temples, and honour God by a liberal difplay and general communication of his bounties.^ Herodotus, indeed, excepts the Greeks and Egyptians, and Dionyfius of Hali- carnaffus, the Romans, from this general cuftom of other nations ; but to the teftimony of the former we may opp.ofe the thoufand facred proftitutes kept at each of the temples of Corinth and 1 Priap. Carm. 34. Ed. Scioppii. ^ See Plate iii. Fig. 3. 3 Ver. 613. ^ Herodot. lib. ii. OF PRIJPUS. 105 Eryx;^ and to that of the latter the exprefs words of Juvenal, who, though he lived an age later, lived when the fame religion, and nearly the fame manners, prevailed.^ Diodorus Siculus alfo tells us, that when the Roman praetors vifited Eryx, they laid afide their magifterial feverity, and honoured the goddefs by mix- ing with her votaries, and indulging themfelves in the pleafures over which fhe prefided.^ It appears, too, that the ad of genera- tion was a fort of facrament in the ifland of Lefbos; for the device on its medals (which in the Greek republics had always fome relation to religion) is as explicit as forms can make it/ The figures appear indeed to be myftic and allegorical, the male having evidently a mixture of the goat in his beard and features, and there- fore probably reprefents Pan, the generative power of the univerfe, incorporated in univerfal matter. The female has all that breadth and fulnefs which charaderife the perfonification of the paflive power, known by the titles of Rhea, Juno, Ceres, &c. When there were fuch feminaries for female education as thofe of Eryx and Corinth, we need not wonder that the ladies of anti- quity fhould be extremely well inftru6ted in all the practical duties of their religion. The ftories told of Julia and Meflalina fhow us that the Roman ladies were no ways deficient; and yet they were as remarkable for their gravity and decency as the Corinthians were for their fkill and dexterity in adapting themfelves to all the modes and attitudes which the luxuriant imaginations of expe- rienced votaries have contrived for performing the rites of their tutelar goddefs.^ The reafon why thefe rites were always performed by night, was the peculiar fandtity attributed to it by the ancients, becaufe dreams were then fuppofed to defcend from heaven to infl:ru(5l and 1 Strab. lib. viii. 2 Sat. ix. ver. 24. 3 Lib. iv. Eii. Wejfel. 4 See Plate ix. Fig. 8, from one belonging to me. 5 Philodemi Epigr. Brunk. Anale8. vol. ii. p. 8$. io6 ON THE WORSHIP forewarn men. The nights, fays Hefiod, belong to the blefled gods;^ and the Orphic poet calls night the fource of all things {yravToiv r^eveai<;) to denote that produdive power, which, as I have been told, it really pofleffes; it being obferved that plants and animals grow more by night than by day. The ancients extended this power much further, and fuppofed that not only the pro- ductions of the earth, but the luminaries of heaven, were nourifhed and fuftained by the benign influence of the night. Hence that beautiful apofl:rophe in the "Eledra" of Euripides, O w^ fieXaiva, Xpvaecov acrrpcov rpo^e^ &c. Not only the facrifices to the generative deities, but in general all the religious rites of the Greeks, were of the feftive kind. To imitate the gods, was, in their opinion, to feafl: and rejoice, and to cultivate the ufeful and elegant arts, by which we are m ade par- takers of their felicity.^ This was the cafe with almofl: all the nations of antiquity, except the^ Egyptians and their reformed imitators the Jews,* who being governed by a hierarchy, endea- voured to make it awful and venerable to the people by an appear- ance of rigour and aufl:erity. The people however, fometimes broke through this refliraint, and indulged themfelves in the more pleafing worfliip of their neighbours, as when they danced and feafl:ed before the golden calf which Aaron ereded,^ and devoted themfelves to the worfhip of obfcene idols, generally fuppofed to be of Priapus, under the reign of Abijam.'' The Chrifliian religion, being a reformation of the Jewifli, rather increafed than diminiflied the auflierity of its original. On particular occafions however it equally abated its rigour, and gave way to feftivity and mirth, though always with an air of fandlity and 1 E/37. ver. 730. 2 Strabo, lib. x. ^ Herodot, lib. ii. 4 See Spencer de Leg. Rit. Vet. Hebraor. ^ Exod. ch. xxxii. 6 ^1?^. c. XV. ver. 13. Ed. Cleric. OF PRIJPUS. 107 folemnity. Such were originally the feafts of the Eucharift, which, as the word exprefles, were meetings of joy and gratulation ; though, as divines tell us, all of the fpiritual kind : but the parti- cular manner in which St. Auguftine commands the ladies who attended them to wear clean linen,^ feems to infer, that perfonal as well as fpiritual matters were thought worthy of attention. To thofe who adminifler the facrament in the modern way, it may appear of little confequence whether the women received it in clean linen or not ; but to the good bifhop, who was to adminifler the holy ki/s, it certainly was of fome importance. The holy kifs was not only applied as a part of the ceremonial of the Eucharift, but alfo of prayer, at the conclufion of which they welcomed each other with this natural fign of love and benevolence.'^ It was upon thefe occafions that they worked themfelves up to thofe fits of rapture and enthufiafm, which made them eagerly rufh upon deftrudtion in the fury of their zeal to obtain the crown of martyrdom.^ En- thufiafm on one fubjedl naturally produces enthufiafm on another ; for the human paffions, like the ftrings of an inftrument, vibrate to the motions of each other : hence paroxyfms of love and devotion have oftentimes fo exadlyaccorded,asnottohavebeendiftinguifhed by the very perfons whom they agitated.* This was too often the cafe in thefe meetings of the primitive Chriftians. The feafts of gratulation and love, the a^airat and nofturnal vigils, gave too flattering opportunities to the paffions and appetites of men, to continue long, what we are told they were at firft, pure exercifes of devotion. The fpiritual raptures and divine ecftafies encouraged on thefe occafions, were often ecftafies of a very different kind, con- cealed under the garb of devotion ; whence the greateft irregularities enfued; and it became necefTary for the reputation of the church, 1 Aug. Serm. clii. 2 Juftin Martyr. Apolog. 3 Martini Kempii de Ofculis DiJ/ert. viii. ■* See Proces de la Cadi'cre. io8 ON THE WORSHIP that they fhould be fupprefled, as they afterwards were by the decrees of feveral councils. Their fuppreffion may be confidered as the final fubverfion of that part of the ancient religion which I have here undertaken to examine ; for fo long as thofe nodurnal meetings were preferved, it certainly exifted, though under other names, and in a more folemn drefs. The fmall remain of it preferved at Ifernia, of which an account has here been given, can fcarcely be deemed an exception ; for its meaning was unknown to thofe who celebrated it ; and the obfcurity of the place, added to the vener- able names of S. Cofimo and Damiano, was all that prevented it from being fupprefled long ago, as it has been lately, to the great difmay of the chafte matrons and pious monks of Ifernia. Traces and memorials of it feem however to have been preferved, in many parts of Chrifl:endom, long after the aftual celebration of its rites ceafed. Hence the obfcene figures obfervable upon many of our Gothic Cathedrals, and particularly upon the ancient brafs doors of St. Peter's at Rome, where there are fome groups which rival the devices on the Lefbian medals. It is curious, in looking back through the annals of fuperftition, fo degrading to the pride of man, to trace the progrefs of the human mind in different ages, climates, and circumflances, uni- formly afting upon the fame principles, and to the fame ends. The fketch here given of the corruptions of the religion of Greece, is an exaft counterpart of the hiflory of the corruptions of Chriflianity, which began in the pure theifm of the ecleftic Jews,^ and by the help of infpirations, emanations, and canonizations, expanded itfelf, by degrees, to the vafl and unwieldy fyftem which now fills the creed of what is commonly called the Catholic Church. In the ancient religion, however, the emanations afTumed the appearance of moral 1 Compare the doftrines of Philo with thofe taught in the Gofpel of St, John, and Epiftles of St. Paul. OF PRIAPUS. 109 virtues and phyfical attributes, inftead of miniftering fpirits and guardian angels; and the canonizations or deifications were beftowed upon heroes, legiflators, and monarchs, inftead of priefts, monks, and martyrs. There is alfo this further difference, that among the moderns philofophy has improved, as religion has been corrupted ; whereas, among the ancients, religion and philofophy declined to- gether. The true folar fyftem was taught in the Orphic fchool, and adopted by the Pythagoreans, the next regularly-eftablifhed fed. The Stoics corrupted it a little, by placing the earth in the centre of the univerfe, though they ftill allowed the fun its fuperior mag- nitude.^ At length arofe the Epicureans, who confounded it entirely, maintaining that the fun was only a fmall globe of fire, a few inches in diameter, and the ftars little tranfitory lights, whirled about in the atmofphere of the earth.^ How ill foever adapted the ancient fyftem of emanations was to procure eternal happinefs, it was certainly extremely well calcu- lated to produce temporal good ; for, by the endlefs multiplication of fubordinate deities, it effedually excluded two of the greateft curfes that ever afflidled the human race, dogmatical theology, and its confequent religious perfecution. Far from fuppofing that the gods known in their own country were the only ones exifting, the Greeks thought that innumerable emanations of the divine mind were diffufed through every part of the univerfe ; fo that new objects of devotion prefented themfelves wherever they went. Every mountain, fpring, and river, had its tutelary deity, befides the numbers of immortal fpirits that were fuppofed to wander in the air, fcattering dreams and vifions, and fuperintending the affairs of men. 1 Brucker, ////?. Crit. Philof. p. ii. lib. ii. c. 9. f. i. 2 Lucret. lib. v. ver. 565, & feq. no ON THE WORSHIP T/3t9 ya^ fivptoL eLcriv eiri ')(6ovi, Trovku^oreLp-q AdavaTOL Z-qvof, (f)v\aK€'i OvrjTWV avd pwirwv .'^ An adequate knowledge of thefe they never prefumed to think attainable, but modeftly contented themfelves with revering and invoking them whenever they felt or wanted their affiftance. When a ihipwrecked mariner was caft upon an unknown coaft, he immediately offered up his prayers to the gods of the country, whoever they were; and joined the inhabitants in whatever rites they thought proper to propitiate them with.'^ Impious or pro- phane rites he never imagined could exift, concluding that all expreffions of gratitude and fubmiffion mufl be pleafing to the gods. Atheifm was, indeed, punifhed at Athens, as the obfcene ceremonies of the Bacchanalians were at Rome ; but both as civil crimes againft the ftate ; the one tending to weaken the bands of fociety by deftroying the fancftity of oaths, and the other to fubvert that decency and gravity of manners, upon which the Romans fo much prided themfelves. The introdudion of ftrange gods, with- out permiffion from the magiftrate, was alfo prohibited in both cities ; but the reftridion extended no farther than the walls, there being no other parts of the Roman empire, except Judea, in which any kind of impiety or extravagance might not have been main- tained with impunity, provided it was maintained merely as a fpecu- lative opinion, and not employed as an engine of fadion, ambition, or oppreffion. The Romans even carried their condefcenfion fo far as to enforce the obfervance of a dogmatical religion, where they found it before eftablifhed ; as appears from the condud; of their magiftrates in Judea, relative to Chrift and his apoftles ; and iHefiod. EpyaKUi ^Hfiep. ver.z52, fxvptoi^SiC, are always ufed as indefinites by the ancient Greek poets. 2 See Homer. OJyJ/] e, ver. 445, & feq. The Greeks feem to have adopted by degrees into their own ritual all the rites praftifed in the neighbouring countries. OF PRIAPUS. Ill fromwhat Jofephus has related, of a Roman foldier's being punifhed with death by his commander for infulting the Books of Mofes. Upon what principle then did they ad, when they afterwards per- fecuted the Chriftians with fo much rancour and cruelty? Perhaps it may furprife perfons not ufed to the ftudy of ecclefiaftical antiquities, to be told (what is neverthelefs indifputably true) that the Chriftians were never perfecuted on account of the fpeculative opinions of individuals, but either for civil crimes laid to their charge, or for withdrawing their allegiance from the ftate, and joining in a federative union dangerous by its conftitution, and rendered ftill more dangerous by the intolerant principles of its members, who often tumultuoufly interrupted the public worftiip, and continually railed againft the national religion (with which both the civil government and military difcipline of the Romans were infeparably conneded), as the certain means of eternal damna- tion. To break this union, was the great objed of Roman policy during a long courfe of years; but the violent means employed only tended to cement it clofer. Some of the Chriftians themfelves indeed, who were addided to Platonifm, took a fafer method to diflblve it ; but they were too few in number to fucceed. This was by trying to moderate the furious zeal which gave life and vigour to the confederacy, and to blend and foften the unyielding temper of religion with the mild fpirit of philofophy. "We all," faid they, "agree in worftiipping one fupreme God, the Father and Preferver of all. While we approach him with purity of mind, fmcerity of heart, and innocence of manners, forms and ceremonies of worftiip are indifferent; and not lefs worthy of his greatnefs, for being varied and diverfified according to the various cuftoms and opinions of men. Had it been his will that all ftiould have worftiipped him in the fame mode, he would have given to all the fame inclinations and conceptions: but he has wifely ordered it otherwife, that piety and virtue might increafe by an honeft 112 ON THE WORSHIP emulation of religions, as induftry in trade, or adivity in a race, from the mutual emulation of the candidates for wealth and honour,"^ This was too liberal and extenfive a plan, to meet the approbation of a greedy and ambitious clergy, whofe objeft was to eftablifh a hierarchy for themfelves, rather than to procure happinefs for others. It was accordingly condemned with vehe- mence and fuccefs by Ambrofius, Prudentius, and other orthodox leaders of the age. It was from the ancient fyftem of emanations, that the general hofpitality which charaderifed the manners of the heroic ages, and which is fo beautifully reprefented in the Odyjfey of Homer, in a great meafure arofe. The poor, and the ftranger who wandered in the ftreet and begged at the door, were fuppofed to be animated by a portion of the fame divine fpirit which fuftained the great and powerful. They are all from Jupiter, fays Homer, and a Jmall gift is acceptable? This benevolent fentiment has been compared by the Englifh commentators to that of the Jewifh moralift, who fays, that he who giveth to the poor lendeth to the Lord, who will rep ay him tenfold? But it is fcarcely poffible for anything to be more different: Homer promifes no other reward for charity than the benevolence of the aftion itfelf; but the Ifraelite holds out that which has always been the great motive for charity among his countrymen — the profped of being repaid ten-fold. They are always ready to fhow their bounty upon fuch incentives, if they can be perfuaded that they are founded upon good fecurity. It was the opinion, however, of many of the moft learned among the ancients, that the principles of the Jewifh religion were originally the fame as thofe of the Greek, and that their God was no other than the creator and generator Bacchus,* who, being viewed 1 Symmach. Ep. i o ^ 6 1 . Themift. Orat ad Imperat. 2 Qdyjf. ^, ver. 207. 3 See Pope's Odyjfey. ^ Tacit. Hijior. lib. v. OF PRIAPUS. 113 through the gloomv medium of the hierarchy, appeared to them a jealous and irafcible God; and fo gave a more auftere and unfociable form to their devotion. The golden vine preferved in the temple at Jerufalem/ and the taurine forms of the cherubs, between which the Deity was fuppofed to refide, were fymbols fo exadlly fimilar to their own, that they naturally concluded them meant to exprefs the fame ideas ; efpecially as there was nothing in the avowed principles of the Jewifh worfhip to which they could be applied. The ineffable name alfo, which, according to the Mafforethic punctuation, is pronounced Jehovah^ was anciently pronounced Jaho^ law, or levco^ which was a title of Bacchus, the nodurnal fun;^ as was alfo SabaziuSy or Sabadius^ which is the fame word as Sabbaoth^ one of the fcriptural titles of the true God, only adapted to the pronunciation of a more polifhed language. The Latin name for the Supreme God belongs alfo to the fame root; Iv-iraTTjp^ Jupiter, fignifying Father leu', though written after the ancient manner, without the diphthong, which was not in ufe for many ages after the Greek colonies fettled in Latium, and intro- duced the Arcadian alphabet. We find St. Paul likewife acknow- ledging, that the Jupiter of the poet Aratus was the God whom he adored;^ and Clemens of Alexandria explains St. Peter's pro- hibition of worfhipping after the manner of the Greeks, not to mean a prohibition of worfhipping the fame God, but merely of the corrupt mode in which he was then worfhipped.*' 1 The vine and goblet of Bacchus arc alfo the ufual devices upon the Jewifh and Samaritan coins, which were ftruclc under the Afmonean kings. ~ Hieron. Comm. in Pfalm. viii. Diodor. Sic. lib. i. Philo-Bybl. ap. Eufeb. Prep. Evang. lib. 1. c. ix. 3 Macrob. Sat. lib. i. c. xviii. ^ Ibid. ^ ASl. Apojl. c. xvii. ver. 28. ^ Stromal, lib. v. FINIS. ON THE WORSHIP OF THE GENERATIVE POWERS DURING THE MIDDLE AGES OF WESTERN EUROPE. ^ ON THE WORSHIP OF THE GENERATIVE POWERS DURING THE MIDDLE AGES OF WESTERN EUROPE. ICHARD PAYNE KNIGHT has written withgreat learning on the origin and hiftory of the worfliip of Priapus among the ancients. This worfhip, which was but a part of that of the generative powers, appears to have been the moft ancient of the fuper- ftitions of the human race/ has prevailed more or lefs among all known peoples before the introduction of Chriftianity, and, fingularly enough, fo deeply it feems to have been implanted in human nature, that even the promulgation of the Gofpel did not abolifh it, for it continued to exift, accepted and often encouraged by the mediaeval clergy. The occasion of Payne Knight's work. ^ There appears to be a chance of this worfhip being claimed for a very early period in the hiftory of the human race. It has been recently ftated in the " Moni- teur," that, in the province of Venice, in Italy, excavations in a bone-cave have brought to light, beneath ten feet of ftalagmite, bones of animals, moftly poft- tertiary, of the ufual defcription found in fuch places, flint implements, with a needle of bone having an eye and point, and a plate of an argillaceous compound, on which was fcratched a rude drawing of a phallus. — Moniteur, Jan. 1865. ii8 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE was the difcovery that this worfhip continued to prevail in his time, in a very remarkable form, at Ifernia in the kingdom of Naples, a full defcription of which will be found in his work. The town of Ifernia was deftroyed, with a great portion of its inhabitants, in the terrible earthquake which fo fearfully devaftated the kingdom of Naples on the 26th of July, 1805, nineteen years after the appear- ance of the book alluded to. Perhaps with it perifhed the laft trace of the worfhip of Priapus in this particular form ; but Payne Knight was not acquainted with the fad that this fuperftition, in a variety of forms, prevailed throughout Southern and Weftern Europe largely during the Middle Ages, and that in fome parts it is hardly extind at the prefent day ; and, as its effeds were felt to a more confiderable extent than people in general fuppofe in the moft inti- mate and important relations of fociety, whatever we can do to throw light upon its mediaeval exiftence, though not an agreeable fubjed, cannot but form an important and valuable contribution to the better knowledge of mediaeval hiftory. Many interefting fads relating to this fubjed were brought together in a volume publifhed in Paris by Monfieur J. A. Dulaure, under the title, Des Divin- ites Generatrices chez les Anciens et les Modernes, forming part of an Hijloire Ahregee des differens Cukes, by the fame author.^ This book, however, is ftill very imperfed ; and it is the defign of the following pages to give, with the moft interefting of the fads already colleded by Dulaure, other fads and a defcription and explanation of monuments, which tend to throw a greater and more general light on this curious fubjed. The medieval worftiip of the generative powers, reprefented by the generative organs, was derived from two diftind fources. In the firft place, Rome invariably carried into the provinces ftie had 1 The fecond edition of this work, publifhed in 1825, is by much the beft, and is confiderably enlarged from the firft. GENERATIVE POIVERS. 119 conquered her own inftitutions and forms of wor{hip,and eftahlifhed them permanently. In exploring the antiquities of thefe provinces, we are aftonifhed at the abundant monuments of the worfhip of Priapus in all the fhapes and with all the attributes and accompani- ments, with which we are already fo well acquainted in Rome and Italy. Among the remains of Roman civilization in Gaul, we find ftatues or ftatuettes of Priapus, altars dedicated to him, the gardens and fields entrufted to his care, and the phallus, or male member, figured in a variety of fhapes as a proteding power againft evil influences of various kinds. With this idea the well-known figure was fculptured on the walls of public buildings, placed in confpicuous places in the interior of the houfe, worn as an orna- ment by women, and fufpended as an amulet to the necks of chil- dren. Erotic fcenes of the mofl: extravagant defcription covered veflels of metal, earthenware, and glafs, intended, no doubt, for feft;ivals and ufages more or lefs connected with the worfhip of the principle of fecundity. At Aix in Provence there was found, on or near the fite of the ancient baths, to which it had no doubt fome relation, an enormous phallus, encircled with garlands, fculptured in white marble. At Le Chatelet, in Champagne, on the fite of a Roman town, a coloffal phallus was alfo found. Similar objeds in bronze, and of fmaller dimenfions, are fo common, that explorations are feldom carried on upon a Roman fite in which they are not found, and examples of fuch objefts abound in the mufeums, public or private, of Roman antiquities. The phallic worfhip appears to have flourifhed efpecially at Nemaufus, now reprefented by the city of Nimes in the fouth of France, where the fymbol of this worfhip appeared in fculpture on the walls of its amphitheatre and on other buildings, in forms fome of which we can hardly help regarding as fanciful, or even playful. Some of the more remarkable of thefe are figured in our plates, XXV and xxvi. I20 ON "THE WORSHIP OF rHE The firft ofthefe/ is the figure of a double phallus. Itisfculp- tured on the lintel of one of the vomitories, or ifTues, of the fecond range of feats of the Roman amphitheatre, near the entrance-gate which looks to the fouth. The double and the triple phallus are very common among the fmall Roman bronzes, which appear to have ferved as amulets and for other fimilar purpofes. In the latter, one phallus ufually ferves as the body, and is furnifhed with legs, generally thofe of the goat ; a fecond occupies the ufual place of this organ ; and a third appears in that of a tail. On a pilafter of the amphitheatre of Nimes we fee a triple phallus of this defcrip- tion,^ with goat's legs and feet. A fmall bell is fufpended to the fmaller phallus in front ; and the larger organ which forms the body is furnifhed with wings. The picture is completed by the introdudlion of three birds, two of which are pecking the unveiled head of the principal phallus, while the third is holding down the tail with its foot. Several examples of thefe triple phalli occur in the Mufee Secret of the antiquities of Herculaneum and Pompeii. In the examples figured in that work,the hind part of the main phallus aflumes clearly the form of a dog ;^ and to mod of them are attached fmall bells, the explanation of which appears as yet to be very unfatisfad:ory. The wings alfo are common attributes of the phallus in thefe monuments. Plutarch is quoted as an authority for the explanation of the triple phallus as intended to fignify multiplication of its productive faculty.* On the top of another pilafter of the amphitheatre at Nimes, to the right of the principal weftern entrance, was a bas-relief, alfo _± 1 Plate XXV, Fig. i. 2 See our Plate xxv. Fig. 2. 3 The writer of the text to the Mufce Secret fuppofes that this circumflance has fome reference to the double meaning given to the Greek word kvwv, which was used for the generative organ. 4 See Augufte Pelet, Catalogue du Mufee de Nimes. GENERATIVE POWERS. 121 reprefenting a triple phallus, with legs of dog, and winged, hut with a further accompaniment.^ A female, drefied in the Roman ftola, ftands upon the phallus forming the tail, and holds both it and the one forming the body with a bridle." This bas-relief was taken down in 1829, and is now preferved in the mufeum of Nimes. A ftill more remarkable monument of this clafs was found in the courfe of excavations made at Nimes in 1825. It is en- graved in our plate xxvi, and reprefents a bird, apparently in- tended for a vulture, with fpread wings and phallic tail, fitting on four eggs, each of which is defigned, no doubt, to reprefent the female organ. The local antiquaries give to this, as to the other fimilar objeds, an emblematical fignification ; but it may perhaps be more rightly regarded as a playful conception of the imagina- tion. A fimilar defign, with fome modifications, occurs not unfre- quently among Gallo-Roman antiquities. We have engraved a figure of the triple phallus governed, or guided, by the female,^ from a fmall bronze plate, on which it appears in bas-relief; it is now preferved in a private colledlion in London, with a duplicate, which appears to have been caft: from the fame mould, though the plate is cut through, and they were evidently intended for fufpenfion from the neck. Both came from the col- ledion of M. Baudot of Dijon. The lady here bridles only the principal phallus ; the legs are, as in the monument lafl: deicribed, thofe of a bird, and it is fl:anding upon three egiTs, apple-formed, and reprefenting the organ of the other fex, ^ Plate XXV, Fig. 3. 2 A French antiquary has given an emblematical interpretation of this figure. '* Perhaps," he fays, "it fignifies the empire of woman extending over the three ages of man ; on youth, charafterized by the bell ; on the age of vigour, the ardour of which (lie reilrains ; and on old age, which (he fuftains." This is perhaps more ingenious than convincing. 3 See our Plate xxxvi. Fig. 3. R 122 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE . In regard to this laft-mentioned objeft, another very remarkable monument of what appears at Nimes to have been by no means a fecret worfhip, was found there during fome excavations on the fite of the Roman baths. It is a fquared mafs of ftone, the four fides of which, like the one reprefented in our engraving, are covered with fimilar figures of the fexual charaderiftics of the female, arranged in rows/ It has evidently ferved as a bafe, pro- bably to a ftatue, or poffibly to an altar. This curious monument is now preferved in the mufeum at Nimes. As Nimes was evidently a centre of this Priapic worfhip in the fouth of Gauljfo there appear to have been, perhaps leffer, centres in other parts, and we may trace it to the northern extremities of the Roman province, even to the other fide of the Rhine. On the fite of Roman fettlements near Xanten, in lower Hefre,a large quantity of pottery and other objeds have been found, of a character to leave no doubt as to the prevalence of this worfiiip in that quarter." But the Roman fettlement which occupied the fite of the modern city of Antwerp appears to have been one of the mofl: remarkable feats of the worfliip of Priapus in the north of Gaul, and it con- tinued to exifl: there till a comparatively modern period. When we crofs over to Britain we find this worfiiip efl:ablifiied no lefs firmly and extenfively in that ifland. Statuettes of Priapus, phallic bronzes, pottery covered with obfcene piftures, are found wherever there are any extenfive remains of Roman occupation, as our antiquaries know well. The numerous phallicfigures in bronze, found in England, are perfeftly identical in charader with thofe 1 See Plate xxv. Fig. 4. 2 Two Roman towns, Caftra Vetera and Colonia Trajana, ftood within no great diilance of Xanten, and Ph. Houben, a " notarius " of this town, formed a private mufeum of antiquities found there, and in 1839 publifhed engravings of them, with a text by Dr. Franz Fiedler. The erotic objefts form a feparate work under the title, Antike erotifche Bildwerke in Hoube?is Antiquarium zu Xa?ite?i. GENERATIVE POWERS. 123 which occur in I^Vance and in Italy. In illuftration of this fad, we give two examples of the triple phallus, which appears to have been, perhaps in accordance with the explanation given by Plu- tarch, an amulet in great favour. The firfl: was found in London in 1842.^ As in the examples found on the continent, a principal phallus forms the body, having the hinder parts of apparently a dog, with wings of a peculiar form, perhaps intended for thofe of a dragon. Several fmall rings are attached, no doubt for the pur- pofe of fufpending bells. Our fecond example'" was found at York in 1844. It difplays a peculiarity of aftion which, in this cafe at leaft, leaves no doubt that the hinder parts were intended to be thofe of a dog. All antiquaries of any experience know the great number of obfcene fubjefts which are met with among the fine red pottery which is termed Samian ware, found fo abundantly in all Roman fites in our ifland. They reprefent erotic fcenes in every fenfe of the word, promifcuous intercourfe between the fexes, even vices contrary to nature, with figures of Priapus, and phallic emblems. We give as an example one of the lejs exceptionable fcenes of this defcription, copied from a Samian bowl found in Cannon Street, London, in 1838.'* The lamps, chiefly of earthenware, form ano- ther clafs of objeds on which fuch fcenes are frequently pourtrayed, and to which broadly phallic forms are fometimes given. One of thefe phallic lamps is here reprefented, on the fame plate with the bowl of Samian ware juft defcribed.* It is hardly neceffary to explain the fubjed reprefented by this lamp, which was found in London a few years ago. All this obfcene pottery mufl: be regarded, no doubt, as a proof of a great amount of diflolutenefs in the morals of Roman focicty in Britain, but it is evidence of fomethingmore. It is hardly likely 1 See Plate xxvii, Fig. 3. 2 pjate xxvii. Fig. 4. 3 Plate XXVII, Fig. i. < Plate xxvii. Fig. 2. 124 ON rUE WORSHIP OF THE that fuch objefts could be in common ufe at the family table ; and we are led to fuppofe that they were employed on fpecial occafions, feftivals, perhaps, connected with the licentious worfhip of which we are fpeaking, and fuch as thofe defcribed in fuch ftrong terms in the fatires of Juvenal. But monuments are found in this ifland which bear ftill more diredt evidence to the existence of the worfhip of Priapus during the Roman period. In the parifh of Adel, in Yorkfhire, are confiderable traces of a Roman ftation, which appears to have been a place of fome import- ance, and which certainly poffefled temples. On the fite of thefe were found altars, and other ftones with infcriptions, which, after being long preferved in an outhoufe of the redlory at Adel, are now depofited in the mufeum of the Philofophical Society at Leeds. One of the moft curious of thefe, which we have here engraved for the firft time,^ appears to be a votive offering to Priapus, who feems to be addreffed under the name of Mentula. It is a rough, unfquared ftone, which has been feleded for pofTeffing a tolerably flat and fmooth furface ; and the figure and letters were made with a rude implement, and by an unfkilled workman, who was evidently unable to cut a continuous fmooth line. The middle of the flone is occupied by the figure of a phallus, and round it we read very diftindly the words: — PRIMINVS MENTLA. The author of the infcription may have been an ignorant Latinifl: as well as an unfkilful fculptor, and perhaps miftook the ligulated letters, overlooking the limb which would make the L fland for VL, and giving A for AE. It would then read Priminus Men- tula^ Priminus to Mentula (the obje6l perfonified), and it may have 1 Plate XXVIII, Fig. i, GENERATIVE POWERS. 125 been a votive offering from fome individual named Priminus, who was in want of a heir, or laboured under fome fexual infirmity, to Priapus, whofe afliftance he fought. Another interpretation has been fuggefted, on the fuppoiition that Mentla, or perhaps (the L being defigned for ILligulated) Mentilaor Mentilla, might be the name of a female joined with her hufband in this offering for their common good. The former of thefe interpretations feems, how- ever, to be the mofl probable. This monument belongs probably to rather a late date in the Roman period. Another exvoto of the fame clafs was found at Weflerwood Fort in Scotland, one of the Roman fortreffes on the wall of Antoninus. This monument^ confifted of a fquare flab of flone, in the middle of which was a phallus, and under it the words EX • VOTO. Above were the letters XAN, meaning, perhaps, that the offerer had laboured ten years MwdtY the grievance of which he fought redrefs from Pri- apus. We may point alfo to a phallic monument of another kind, which reminds us in fome degree of the finer feu Iptu res at Nimes. At Houfefteads, in Northumberland, are feen the extenfive and impofing remains of one of the Roman flations on the Wall of Hadrian named Borcovicus. The walls of the entrance gateways are efpecially well preferved, and on that of the guard-houfe attached to one of them, is a flab of ftone prefenting the figure given in our plate xxviii, fig. 3. It is a rude delineation of a phallus with the legs of a fowl, and reminds us of fome of the monuments in France and Italy previoufly defcribed. Thefe phal- lic images were no doubt expofed in fuch' fituations becaufe they were fuppofed to exercife a protedive influence over the locality, or ' See Plate xxviii, Fig. 2. Horfeley, who engraved this monument in his Britannia Romana, Scotland, fig. xix. has inferted a fig-leaf in place of the phallus, but with flight indications of the form of the objcft it was intended to conceal. We are not aware if this monument is lliil in exiltence. 126 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE over the building, and the individual who looked upon the figure believed himfelf fafe, during that day at leaft, from evil influences of various defcriptions. They are found, we believe, in fome other Roman ftations, in a fimilar pofition to that of the phallus at Houfefteads. Although the worfhip of which we are treating prevailed fo exten- fively among the Romans and throughout the Roman provinces, it was far from being peculiar to them, for the fame fuperftition formed part of the religion of the Teutonic race, and was carried with that race wherever it fettled. The Teutonic god, who anfwered to the Roman Priapus, was called, in Anglo-Saxon, Frea, in Old Norfe, Freyr, and, in Old German, Fro. Among the Swedes, the princi- pal feat of his worfliip was at Upfala, and Adam of Bremen, who lived in the eleventh century, when paganifm ftill retained its hold on the north, in defcribing the forms under which the gods were there reprefented, tells us that " the third of the gods at Upfala was Fricco [another form of the name], who beftowed on mortals peace and pleafure, and who was reprefented with an immen/e pri- apus ; " and he adds that, at the celebration of marriages, they offered facrifice to Fricco.^ This god, indeed, like the Priapus of the Romans, prefided over generation and fertility, either of animal life or of the produce of the earth, and was invoked accordingly. Ihre, in his Glojfarium Sueco-Gothicum, mentions objeds of antiquity dug up in the north of Europe, which clearly prove the prevalence of phallic rites. To this deity, or to his female reprefentative of the fame name, the Teutonic Venus, Friga, the fifth day of the week was dedicated, and on that account received its name, in Anglo- Saxon, Frige-daeg, and in modern Englifh Friday. Frigedaeg appears 1 " Tertius eft Fricco, pacem voluptatemque largiens mortalibus, cujus etiam fimu- lachrum fingunt ingenti priapo ; fi nuptias celebrandas funt, Fricconi [facrificia offe- runt.] " — Adam Bremens, De Situ Daniee, p. 23, ed. 1629. GENERATIVE POWERS. 127 to have been a name fometimes given in Anglo-Saxon to Frea him- felf; in a charter of the date of 959, printed in Kemble's Co<^^x Z)//)/o- maticus^ one of the marks on a boundary-line of land is Frigeda^ges- Trc'^ow, meaning apparently Frea's tree, which was probably a tree dedicated to that god, and the fcene of Priapic rites. There is a place called Fridaythorpe in Yorkfhire, and Frifton, a name which occurs in feveral parts of England, means, probably, the ftone of Frea or of Friga ; and we feem juftified in fuppofing that this and other names commencing with the fyllable Fri or Fry, are fo many monuments of the exiftence of the phallic worfhip among our Anglo-Saxon forefathers. Two cuftoms cherifhed among our old Englifh popular fuperftitions are believed to have been derived from this worfhip, the need-fires, and the proceffion of the boar's head at the Chriftmas feftivities. The former were fires kindled at the period of the fummer folftice, and were certainly in their origin religious obfervances. The boar was intimately connected with the worfhip of Frea.^ From our want of a more intimate knowledge of this partof Teu- tonic paganifm, we are unable to decide whether fome of the fuperfti- tious pradlices of the middle ages were derived from the Romans or from the peoples who eftablifhed themfelves in the provinces after the overthrow of the weftern empire; but in Italy and in Gaul (the fouthern parts efpecially), where the Roman inflitutions and fenti- ments continued with more perfiftence to hold their influence, it was the phallic worfl-iip of the Romans which, gradually modified in its forms, was thus preferved, and, though the records of fuch a worfhip are naturally accidental and imperfed, yet we can diflindly trace its exiftence to a very late period. Thus, we have clear evi- dence that the phallus, in its fimple form, was worfhipped by the mediaeval Chriflians, and that the forms of Chriflian prayer 1 See Grimm's Deutfche Mythologie, p. 139, firft edition. 128 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE and invocation were aftually addrefled to it. One name of the male organ among the Romans was fafcinum; it was under this name that it was fufpended round the necks of women and children, and under this name efpecially it was fuppofed to poffefs magical influences which not only a6ted upon others, but de- fended thofe who were under its protection from magical or other evil influences from without. Hence are derived the words tofaf- cinate 2i\\di fafcination. The word is ufed by Horace, and efpecially in the epigrams of the Priapeia^ which may be confidered in fome degree as the exponents of the popular creed in thefe matters. Thus we have in one of thefe epigrams the lines, — " Placet, Priape ? qui fub arboris coma Soles, facrum revinfte pampino caput. Ruber federe cum rubente fafcino. ' ' Priap. Carm. Ixxxiv. It feems probable that this had become the popular, or vulgar, word for the phallus, at leaft taken in this point of view, at the clofe of the Roman power, for the firfl: very difliind traces of its worfliip which we find afterwards introduce it under this name, which fub- fequently took in French the ioxm. fefne. The mediaeval worfliip of t\vQ fafcinum is firfl fpoken of in the eighth century. An ecclefiaf- tical trad entitled fudicia Sacerdotalia de Criminibus^ which is afcribed to the end of that century, direds that "if any one has per- formed incantation to the fafcinum, or any incantation whatever, except any one who chaunts the Creed or the Lord's Prayer, let him do penance on bread and water during three lents." An ad of the ^ Martene and Darand, Veterum Scriptorum AmpUJJima ColleSiio, torn, vii, p. 35. Si quis prsecantaverit ad fafcinum, velqualefcumque praecantationes excepto fymbolum fanftum aut orationem dominicam qui cantat et cui cantatur, tres quadrigefimas in pane et aqua poeniteat. GENERAriVE POWERS. iiy council of Chalons, held in the ninth century, prohibits the fame practice almoft in the fame words; and Burchardus repeats it again in the twelfth century,^ a proof of the continued exiftence of this worfhip. That it was in full force long after this is proved by the ftatutes of the fynod of Mans, held in 1247, which enjoin fimihirly the punifhment for him "who has finned to th.^ fafcinum^ or has performed any incantations, except the creed, the pater nofter, or other canonical prayer."'^ This fame provifion was adopted and renewed in the ftatutes of the fynod of Tours, held in 1396, in which, as they were publifhed in French, the h.cit'in fafcinum is reprefented by the French fefne. The fajcinum to which fuch worfhip was direfted muft have been fomething more than a fmall amulet. This brings us to the clofe of the fourteenth century, and fhows us how long the outward worfhip of the generative powers, repre- fented by their organs, continued to exift in Weftern Europe to fuch a point as to engage the attention of ecclefiaftical fynods. During the previous century fads occurred in our own ifland illuf- trating ftill more curioufly the continuous exiflence of the worfhip of Priapus, and that under circumftances which remind us altoge- ther of the details of the phallic worfhip under the Romans. It will be remembered that one great objedl of this worfhip was to obtain fertility either in animals or in the ground, for Priapus was the god of the horticulturift and the agriculturifl:. St. Auguftine, declaiming againft the open obfcenities of the Roman feftival of the Liberalia, informs us that an enormous phallus was curried in a ' D. Burchardi Dccrctorum libri, lib. x, c. 49. ^ Martcne et Durand, AmpliJJima Colledio Veterum Scriptorum, torn, vii, col. i 377. Si peccavcrit ad fafcinum, vcl qualcrciimquc prajcantationcs feccrit, excepto iymbolo et oratione dominica, vcl alia oratione canonica, et qui cantat, et cui cantatur, trcs quadragefimas pceniteat. S I30 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE magnificent chariot into the middle of the public place of the town with great ceremony, where the moft refpeftable matron advanced and placed a garland of flowers "on this obfcene figure;" and this, he fays, was done to appeafe the god, and "to ob- tain an abundant harveft, and remove enchantments from the land."^ We learn from the Chronicle of Lanercoil that, in the year 1268, a peftilence prevailed in the Scottifh diftrid of Lothian, which was very fatal to the cattle, to counteract which fome of the clergy — bejiiales, habitu claujtrales, non animo — taught the peafantry to make a fire by the rubbing together of wood (this was the need- fire), and to raife up the image of Priapus, as a means of faving their cattle, " When a lay member of the Cifliercian order at Fenton had done this before the door of the hall, and had fprinkled the cattle with a dog's tefl:icles dipped in holy water, and complaint had been made of this crime of idolatry againfl: the lord of the manor, the latter pleaded in his defence that all this was done with- out his knowledge and in his abfence, but added, 'while until the prefent month of June other people's cattle fell ill and died, mine were always found, but now every day two or three of mine die, fo that 1 have few left for the labours of the field.' "^ Fourteen years after this, in 1282, an event of the fame kind occurred at Inver- 1 S. Augullini De Civit. Dei, lib. vii, c. 21. 2 Pro fidei divinse integritate fervanda recolat leftor quod, cum hoc anno in Laodonia peilis graflaretur in pecudes armenti, quam vocant ufitate lungeffbuth, qui- dam bertiales, habitu claullrales non animo, docebant idiotas patris ignem confric- tione de lignis educere, et fimulacrum Priapi ilatuere, et per haec belliis fuccurrere. Quod cum unus laicus Ciilercienfis apud Fentone feciflet ante atrium aulse, ac in- tinftis tefticulis canis in aquam benedidtam fuper animalia fparfifiet ; ac pro invento tacinore idolatrise dominus vills a quodam fideli argueretur, ille pro fua innocentia obtendebat, quod ipfo nefciente et ablente fuerant ha;c omnia perpetrata, et adjecit, ** et cum ad ufque hunc menfem Junium aliorum animalia languerent et deficerent, mea Temper i'ana erant, nunc vero quotidie mihi moriuntur duo vel tria, ita quod agricuitui pauca luperlunt." — Chron. de La7jercoft. ed. Stevenfon, p. 85. GENERATl rE POWERS. 131 keithing, in the prefent county of Fife in Scotland. The caiife of the following proceedings is not ftated, but it was probably the fame as that for which the ciftercian of Lothian had recourfe to the worfhip of Priapus. In the Eafter week of the year juft ftated (March 29 — April 5), a parifh prieft of Inverkeithing, named John, performed the rites of Priapus, by colleding the young girls of the town, and making thern dance round the figure of this god ; without any regard for the fex of thefe worfhippers, he carried a wooden image of the male members of generation before them in the dance, and himfelf dancing with them, he accompanied their fongs with movements in accordance, and urged them to licentious adions by his no lefs licentious language. The more modeft part of thofe who were prefent felt fcandalized by thefe proceedings, and expof- tulated with the prieft, but he treated their words with contempt, and only gave utterance to coarfer obfcenities. He was cited before his biftiop, defended himfelf upon the common ufage of the coun- try, and was allov/ed to retain his benefice; but he muft have been rather a worldly prieft, after the ftyle of the middle ages, for a year afterwards he was killed in a vulgar brawl. ^ The practice of placing the figure of a phallus on the walls of buildings, derived, as we have feen, from the Romans, prevailed alfo in the middle ages, and the buildings efpecially placed under the influence of this fymbol were churches. It was believed to be 1 Infuper hoc tempore apud Invcrcliethin, in hehdomeda pafchaj (March 29 — April 5), facerdos parochialis, nomine Johannes, Priapi prophana parans, congre- gatis ex villa puellulis, cogebat eas, choreis faftis, Libero patri circuire ; ut ille feminas in exercitu habuit, fie ifte, procacitatis caufa, membra humana virtuti iemi- narije iervientia lupcr allerem artificiata ante talem chorcam pr.Tferebat, et ipfe tripudians cum cantantibus motu mimico omnes inipeftantes et vcrbo impudico ad luxuriam incitabat. Hi qui honefto matrimonio honorem deferebant, tam iniolenti officio, licet reverentur perfonam, fcandalizabantur propter gradus emincntiam. Si quis ei feorlum ex amore correptionis lermonem int'erret, fiebat dcterior, et conviciis eos impctcbat. — Chron. dc LancercoJ}. ed. Stcvenfon, p. 109. 132 ON "THE WORSHIP OF THE a protedion againft enchantments of all kinds, of which the people of thofe times lived in conftant terror, and this protedion extended over the place and over thofe who frequented it, provided they caft a confiding look upon the image. Such images were feen, ufually upon the portals, on the cathedral church of Touloufe, on more than one church in Bourdeaux, and on various other churches in France, but, at the time of the revolution, they were often deftroyed as marks only of the depravity of the clergy. Dulaure tells us that an artift, whom he knew, but whofe name he has not given, had made drawings of a number of thefe^ figures which he had met with in fuch fituations.^ A Chriftian faint exercifed fome of the qualities thus deputed to Priapus ; the image of St. Nicholas was ufually painted in a confpicuous pofition in the church, for it was believed that whoever had looked upon it was protected againft enchant- ments, and efpecially againft that great objed: of popular terror the evil eye, during the reft of the day. It is a lingular fad: that in Ireland it was the female organ which was ftiown in this pofition of protedor upon the churches, and the elaborate though rude manner in which thefe figures were fculp- tured, fhow that they were confidered as objeds of great im- portance. They reprefented a female expofing herfelf to view in the moft unequivocal manner, and are carved on a block which appears to have ferved as the key-ftone to the arch of the door-way of the church, where they were prefented to the gaze of all who entered. They appear to have been found principally in the very old churches, and have been moftly taken down, fo that they are only found among the ruins. People have given them the name of 1 He adds in a note : — '< Les deffins de cet artifte, dellines a I'Academie des Belles Lettres, font pafles, on ne fait comment, entre les mains d'un particulier qui en prive le public," — ^J. A. Dulaure, Hijloire de differe?is Cultes, tom. ii. p. 251, 8vo. 1825. GENERATIVE POWERS. 133 Shelah-na-Gig^^\\\(i\\^ we are told, means in Irifh Julian the Giddy, and is (imply a term for an immodeft woman; but it is well under- ftood that they were intended as protecting charms againft the faf- cination of the evil eye. We have given copies of all the examples yet known in our plates xxix and xxx. The firft of thefe^ was found in an old church at Rocheftown, in the county of Tipperary, where it had long been known among the people of the neighbour- hood by the name given above. It was placed in the arch over the doorway, but has fince been taken away. Our fecond example of the Shelah-na-Gig'"^ was taken from an old church lately pulled down in the county Cavan,and is now preferved in the mufeum of the Society of Antiquaries of Dublin. The third^ was found at Ballinahend Caftle, alfo in the county of Tipperary; and the fourth** is preferved in the mufeum at Dublin, but we are not in- formed from whence it was obtained. The next;^ which is alfo now preferved in the Dublin Mufeum, was taken from the old church on the White I{land,in Lough Erne, county Fermanagh. This church is fuppofed by the Irifh antiquaries to be a ftrucflure of very great antiquity, for fome of them would carry its date as far back as the feventh century, but this is probably an exaggeration. The one which follows" was furnifhed by an old church pulled down by order of the ecclefiaftical commifTioners, and it was prefented to the mufeum at Dublin, by the late dean Davvfon. Our laft example'' was for- merly in the pofTelfion of Sir Benjamin Chapman, Bart., of Killoa Caftle, Weftmeath, and is now in a private colledlion in London. It was found in 1859 "^^ Chloran, in afield on Sir Benjamin's eftate known by the name of the "Old Town," from whence ftones had 1 Plate XXIX, Fig. i. - Plate xxix. Fig. 2. 3 Plate XXIX, Fig. 3. ■* Plate xxix. Fig. 4. ^ Plate xxx, Fig. i. '' Plate xxx, Fig. 2. '' Plate xxx, Fig. 3. 134 ON THE IVORSHIP OF THE been removed at previous periods, though there are now very fmall remains of building. This ftone was found at a depth of about five feet from the furface, which fhows that the building, a church no doubt, muft have fallen into ruin a long time ago. Contiguous to this field, and at a diftance of about two hundred yards from the fpot where the Shelah-na-Gig was found, there is an abandoned churchyard, feparated from the Old Town field only by a loofe ftone wall. The belief in the falutary power of this image appears to be a fuperftition of great antiquity, and to exift ftill among all peoples who have not reached a certain degree of civilization. The univer- fality of this fuperftition leads us to think that Herodotus may have erred in the explanation he has given of certain rather re- markable monuments of a remote antiquity. He tells us that Sefoftris, king of Egypt, raifed columns in fome of the countries he conquered, on which he caufed to be figured the female organ of generation as a mark of contempt for thofe who had fubmitted eafily.^ May not thefe columns have been intended, if we knew the truth, as protedions for the people of the diftrid; in which they ftood, and placed in the pofition where they could moft con- veniently be feen ? This fuperftitious fentiment may alfo offer the true explanation of an incident which is faid to have been repre- fented in the myfteries of Eleufis. Ceres, wandering over the earth in fearch of her daughter Proferpine, and overcone with grief for her lofs, arrived at the hut of an Athenian peafant woman named Baubo, who received her hofpitably, and offered her to drink the refrefliing mixture which the Greeks call Cyceon {jcvKewv). The goddefs rejedled the offered kindnefs, and refufed 1 Herodotus, Euterpe, cap. 102. Diodorus Siculus adds to the account given by Herodotus, that Sefoftris also erefled columns bearing the male generative organ as a compliment to the peoples who had defended themfelves bravely. GENERAriFE POWERS. J35 all confolation. Baubo, in her diftrefs, bethought her of another expedient to allay the grief of her gueft. She relieved her fexual organs of that outward fign which is the evidence of puberty, and then prefented them to the view of Ceres, who, at the fight, laughed, forgot her forrows, and drank the cyceon.' The prevail- ing belief in the beneficial influence of this fight, rather than a mere pleafantry, feems to aflxjrd the beft explanation of this fliory ; and the fame fuperftition is no doubt embodied in an old mediaeval fi:ory which we give in a note as it is told in that celebrated book of the fixteenth century Le Moyen de Parvenir? This fuperfl:ition which, as fihown by the Shelah-na-Gigs of the Irifii churches, prevailed largely in the middle ages, explains ano- ther clafs of antiquities which are not uncommon. Thefe are fmall figures of nude females expofing themfelves in exa(!l:ly the fame manner as in the fculptures on the churches in Ireland juft alluded to. Such figures are found not only among Roman, Greek, and Egyptian antiquities, but among every people who had any know- ledge of art, from the aborigines of America to the far more civi- 1 This llory is told by the two Chriilian Fathers, Arnobius, Adverfus Gentes, lib. V. c. 5, and Clemens Alexandrinus, Protrepticus, p. 17, ed. Oxon. 171 5. The latter writer merely Hates that Baubo expofed her parts to the view of the goddefs, without the incident of preparation mentioned by Arnobius. 2 <' Hermes. On nomme ainfi ceux qui n'ont point vu le con de leur femme ou de leur garce. Le pauvre valet de chez nous n'etoit done pas coquebin ; il eut beau le voir. — Varro. Quand? — Hermes. Attendez, etant en fian^ailles, il vouloit prendre le cas dc fa fiancee ; elle ne le vouloit pas ; il faifoit le malade, et elle lui demandoit ; ' Qu'y a-t-il, mon ami ? ' ' Helas, ma mie, je fuis fi malade, que je n'en puis plus ; jc mourrai fi je ne vois ton cas.' * Vraiment voire ? ' dit-elle. * Helas! oui, fi je I'avois vu, je guerirois.' Elle ne lui voulut point montrer ; a la fin, ils furent maries. Iladvint, trois ou quatre mois apres, qu'il fut fort malade ; et il envoya fa femme au medecin pour porter de fon eau. En allant, elle s'avifa de ce qu'il lui avoit dit en fiangailles. Elle retourna vitement, et fe vint mettrc fur le lit ; puis, levant cottc et chcmife, lui prefenta fon cela en belle vue, et lui difoit : ' Jean, regarde le con, et te gueris.' " — Le Moyen de Parvenir, c. xxviii. 136 07V THE WORSHIP OF rHE lized natives of Japan ; and it would be eafy to give examples from almoft every country we know, but we confine ourfelves to our more fpecial part of the fubjed:. In the laft century, a number of fmall ftatuettes in metal, in a rude but very peculiar ftyle of art, were found in the duchy of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, in a part of Germany formerly occupied by the Vandals, and by the tribe of the Obotrites, confidered as a diviiion of the Vendes. They appeared to be intended to reprefent fome of the deities worfhipped by the people who had made them ; and fome of them bore in- fcriptions, one of which was in Runic charaders. From this cir- cumftance we lliould prefume that they belonged to a period not much, if any, older than the fall of the Weftern Empire. Some time afterwards, a fevv' ftatuettes in metal were found in the ifland of Sar- dinia, fo exactly fimilar to thofe juft mentioned, that D'Hancarville, who publifhed an account of them with engravings, considered himfelf juftified in afcribing them to the Vandals, who occupied that ifland, as well as the trad: of Germany alluded to.^ One of thefe images, which D'Hancarville coniiders to be the Venus of the Vandal my- thology, reprefents a female in a reclining pofition, with the wings and claws of a bird, holding to view a pomegranate, open, which, as D'Hancarville remarks, was confidered as a fign reprefenting the female fexual organ. In fad, it was a form and idea more un- equivocally reprefented in the Roman figures which we have already defcribed,^ but which continued through the middle ages, and was preferved in a popular name for that organ, abricot^ or expreffed more energetically, abricot fendu^ ufed by Rabelais, and we believe ftill preferved in France. This curious image is repre- fented, after D'Hancarville, in three different points of view in our ' D'Hancarville, Antiquites Etrufques, Grecques, et Romaincs, Paris, 1785, torn. V. p. 61. 2 See our Plates xxv. Fig. 4, xxvi, and Plate xxxvi. Fig. 3. GENERATIVE POWERS. 137 plate.^ Several figures of a fimllar defcription, but reprefenting the fubjeft in a more matter-of-fa6t fhape, were brought from Egypt by a Frenchman who held an official fituation in that country, and three of them are now in a private colledion in London. We have engraved one of thefe fmall bronzes,^ which, as will be feen, prefents an exad: counterpart of the Shelah-na-Gig. Thefe Egyptain images belonged no doubt to the Roman period. Another fimilar figure,^ made of lead, and apparently mediaeval, was found at Avignon, and is preferved in the fame private col- ledion juft alluded to; and a third,* was dug up, about ten years ago, at Kingfton-on-Thames. The form of thefe ftatuettes feems to fhow that they were intended as portable images, for the fame purpofe as the Shelahs, which people might have ready at hand to look upon for protection whenever they were under fear of the in- fluence of the evil eye, or of any other fort of enchantment. We have not as yet any clear evidence of the exiflience of the Shelah-na-Gig in churches out of Ireland. We have been informed that an example has been found in one of the little churches on the coaft of Devon ; and there are curious fculptures, which ap- pear to be of the fame charader, among the architectural orna- mentation of the very early church of San Fedele at Como in Italy. Three of thefe are engraved in our plate xxxii. On the top of the right hand jamb of the door^ is a naked male figure, and in the fame pofition on the other fide a female,''' which are defcribed to us as reprefenting Adam and Eve, and our informant, to whom we owe the drawings, defcribes that at the apex'' merely as "the figure of a woman holding her legs apart." We under- ftand that the furface of the fl:one in thefe fculptures is fo much 1 Plate XXXI, Figs, i, 2, 3. ^ piate xxxi. Fig. 4. 3 Plate XXXI, Fig. 5. '' Plate xxxvi. Fig. 4. 5 Plate xxxii. Fig. i. ^ Plate xxxii. Fig. 2. "^ Plate XXXII, Fig. 3. 138 ON rHE WORSHIP OF THE worn that it is quite uncertain whether the fexual parts were ever diftindly marked, butfrom the pofturesand pofitions of thehands, and the fituation in which thefe figures are placed, they feem to refemble clofely, except in their fuperior ftyle of art, the Shelah- na-Gigs of Ireland. There can be little doubt that the fuperftition to which thefe objecfts belonged gave rife to much of the indecent fculpture which is fo often found upon mediaeval ecclefiaftical build- ings. The late Baron von Hammer-Piirgftall publifhed a very learned paperupon monuments of various kinds which he confidered as illuftrating the fecret hiftory of the order of the Templars, from which we learn that there was in his time a feries of moft extraordi- nary obfcene fculptures in the church of Schoengraber in Auftria, of which he intended to give engravings, but the drawings had not arrived in time for his book;^ but he has engraved the capital of a column in the church of Egra, a town of Bohemia, of which we give a copy,^ in which the two fexes are difplaying to view the members, which were believed to be fo efficatious againft the power of fafcination. The figure of the female organ, as well as the male, appears to have been employed during the middle agesof Weftern Europe far more generally than we might fuppofe, placed upon buildings as a talifman againft evil influences, and efpecially againft witchcraft and the evil eye, and it was ufed for this purpofe in many other parts of the world. It was the univerfal pradlice among the Arabs of Northern Africa to ftick up over the door of the houfe or tent, or put up nailed on a board in fome other way, the generative organ of a cow, mare, or female camel, as a talifman to avert the influence of the evil eye. It is evident that the figure of this member was far 1 See Von Hammer-Purgftall, Fundgruben des Orients, vol. vi, p. 26. 2 Von Hammer-Purgftall, Fundgruben des Orients, vol. vi, p. 35, and Plate iv. Fig. 31. — See our Plate xxxi. Fig. 6. GENERATIVE POWERS. 139 more liable to degradation in form than that of the male, becaufe it was much lefs eafy, in the hands of rude draughtfmen, to delineate in an intelligible form, and hence it foon afTumed fhapes which, though intended to rcprcfent it, we might rather call fymbolical of it, though no fymbolifm was intended. Thus the figure of the female organ eafily aflumed the rude form of a horfefhoe, and as the original meaning was forgotten, would be readily taken for that objed:, and a real horfefhoe nailed up for the fame purpofe. In this way originated, apparently, from the popular worfhip of the generative powers, the vulgar pracftice of nailing a horfefhoe upon buildings to proted: them and all they contain againft the power of witchcraft, a pracftice which continues to exifl among the peafantry in fome parts of England at the prefent day. Other marks are found, fometimes among the architedural ornaments, fuch as certain tri- angles and triple loops, which are perhaps typical forms of the fame objeft. Wehave been informed that there is an old church in Ireland where the male organ is drawn on one fide of the door, and the Shelah-na-Gig on the other, and that, though perhaps comparatively modern, their import as protecftive charms are well underftood. We can eafily imagine men, uncier the influence of thefe fuperftitions, when they were obliged to halt for a moment by the fide of a building, drawing upon it fuch a figure, with the defign that it fhould be a protedion to themfelves, and thus probably we derive from fuperftitious feelings the common propenfity to draw phallic figures on the fides of vacant walls and in other places. Antiquity had made Priapus a god, the middle ages raifed him into a faint, and that under feveral names. In the fouth of France, Provence, Languedoc, and the Lyonnais, he was worfhipped under the title of St. Foutin.' This name is faid to be a mere corruption 1 Our material for the account of thefe phallic faints is taken moflly from the work of M. Dulaure. I40 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE of Fotinus or Photinus,the firft bifhop of Lyons, to whom, perhaps through giving a vulgar Interpretation to the name, people had transferred the diftinguifhing attribute of Priapus. This was a large phallus of wood, which was an objedl of reverence to the women, efpecially to thofe who were barren, who fcraped the wooden member, and, having fteeped the fcrapings in water, they drank the latter as a remedy againft their barrennefs, or adminiftered it to their hufbands in the belief that it would make them vigorous. The worfhip of this faint, as it was pradiced in various places in France at the commencement of the feventeenth century, is de- fcribed in that fingular book, the Confejfion de Sancy} We there learn that at Varailles in Provence, waxen images of the members of both fexes were offered to St. Foutin, and fufpended to the ceiling of his chapel, and the writer remarks that, as the ceiling was covered with them, when the wind blew them about, it produced an effed: which was calculated to difturb very much the devotions of the worfhippers.^ We hardly need remark that this is juft the fame kind of worfhip which exifted at Ifernia, in the kingdom of Naples, where it was prefented in the fame fhape. At Embrun, in the department of the Upper Alps, the phallus of St. Foutin was worfhipped in a different form ; the women poured a libation of wine upon the head of the phallus, which was coUeded in a vefTel, in which it was left till it became four; it was then called the " fainte vinaigre," and the women employed it for a purpofe which is only obfcurely hinted at. When the Proteflants took Embrun in 1585, they found this phallus laid up carefully 1 La Confeffion de Sancy forms the fifth volume of the Journal d^ Henri III, by Pierre de L'Elloile, ed. Duchat. See pp. 383, 391, of that volume. 2 ♦' Temoin Saint Foutin de Varailles en Provence, auquel font dediees les parties honteules de I'un et de I'autre fexe, formees en cire : le plancher de la chapelle en ell fort garni, et, quand le vent les fait entrebattre, cela debauche un peu les devotions a I'honneur de ce Saint." GENERATIVE POWERS. 141 among the relics in the principal church, its head red with the wine which had been poured upon it. A much larger phallus of wood, covered with leather, was an objed: of worfhip in the church of St. F.utropius at Orange, but it was feizcd by the Pro- teilants and burnt publicly in 1562. St. Foutin was fimilarly an objedl of worfhip at Porigny, at Gives in the diocefe of Viviers, at Vendre in the Bourbonnais, at Auxerre, at Puy-en-Velay, in the convent of Girouet near Sampigny, and in other places. At a diftance of about four leagues from Clermont in Auvergne, there is (or was) an ifolated rock, which prefents the form of an immenfe phallus, and which is popularly called St. Foutin. Similar phallic faints were worfhipped under the names of St. Guerlichon, or Gre- luchon, at Bourg-Dieu in the diocefe of Bourges, of St. Gilles in the Cotentin in Britany, of St. Rene in Anjou, of St. Regnaud in Bur- gundy, of St. Arnaud, and above all of St. Guignolc near Breft and at the village of La Chatelette in Berri. Many of thefe were ftill in exiftence and their worfhip in full pradice in the laft cen- tury ; in fome of them, the wooden phallus is defcribed as being much worn down by the continual procefs of fcraping, while in others the lofs fuftained by fcraping was always reftored by a miracle. This miracle, however, was a very clumfy one, for the phallus confifted of a long ftaff of wood pafTed through a hole in the middle of the body, and as the phallic end in front became fhortened, a blow of a mallet from behind thruft it forward, fo that it was reftored to its original length. It appears that it was alfo the practice to worfhip thefe faints in another manner, which alfo was derived from the forms of the worfhip of Priapus among the ancients, with whom it was the cuftom, in the nuptial ceremonies, for the bride to ofl'er up her virginity to Priapus, and this was done by placing her fexual parts againfl; the end of the phallus, and fomctimes introducing the latter, and even completing the facrifice. This ceremony is reprefentcd in 142 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE a bas-relief in marble, an engraving of which is given in the Mufee Secret of the antiquities of Herculaneum and Pompeii ; its objeft was to conciliate the favour of the god, and to avert fterility. It is defcribed by the early Chriftian writers, fuch as Ladantius and Arnobius, as a very common pradice among the Romans; and it ftill prevails to a great extent over moft part of the Eaft, from India to Japan and the iilands of the Pacific. In a public fquare in Batavia, there is a cannon taken from the natives and placed there as a trophy by the Dutch government. It prefents the peculiarity that the touch-hole is made on a phallic hand, the thumb placed in the poiition which is called the "fig," and which we fhall have to defcribe a little further on. At night, the fl:erile Malay women go to this cannon and fit upon the thumb, and rub their parts with it to produce fruitfulnefs. When leaving, they make an offering of a bouquet of flowers to the "fig." It is always the fame idea of reverence to the fertilizing powers of nature, of which the garland or the bunch of flowers was an appropriate emblem. There are traces of the exifl:ence of this pradice in the middle ages. In the cafe of fome of the priapic faints mentioned above, women fought a remedy for barrennefs by kifling the end of the phallus ; fometimes they appear to have placed a part of their body naked againfl: the image of the faint, or to have fat upon it. This latter trait was perhaps too bold an adoption of the indecencies of pagan worfliip to laft long, or to be prafticed openly ; but it appears to have been more innocently reprefented by lying upon the body of the faint, or fitting upon a flione, underfl:ood to reprefent him without the prefence of the energetic member. In a corner in the church of the village of St. Fiacre, near Mouceaux in France, there is a ftone called the chair of St. Fiacre, which confers fe- cundity upon women who fit upon it ; but it is necefl^ary that nothing fliould intervene between their bare ficin and the ftone. In the church of Orcival in Auvergne, there was a pillar which GENERATIVE POWERS. 143 barren women kifled for the fame purpofe, and which had perhaps replaced fome lefs equivocal objecft.^ Traditions, at leaf!:, of fimilar pradlices were connedled with St. Foutin, for it appears to have been the cuftom for girls on the point of marriage to orter their lalt maiden robe to that faint. This fuperftition prevailed to fuch an extent that it became proverbial. A ftory is told of a young bride who, on the wedding night, fought to deceive her hulliand on the queftion of her previous chaftity, although, as the writer expreffes it, "fhe had long ago de- pofited the robe of her virginity on the altar of St. Foutin."^ From this form of fuperftition is faid to havearifen a vice which is underftood to prevail efpecially in nunneries — the ufe by women of artificial phalli, which appears in its origin to have been a religious ceremony. It certainly exifted at a very remote period, for it is diftindlly alluded to in the Scriptures,'^ where it is evidently con- fidered as a part of pagan worftiip. It is found at an early period of the middle ages, defcribed in the Ecclefiaftical Penitentials, with its appropriate amount of penitence. One of thefe penitential canons of the eighth century fpeaks of "a woman who, by herfelf or with the help of another woman, commits uncleannefs," for which fhe was to do penance for three years, one on bread and water; and if this uncleannefs were committed with a nun, the penance was increafed to feven years, two only on bread and water.* 1 Dulaure relates that one day a villager's wife entering this church, and finding only a burly canon in it, aflced him earnestly, •' Where is the pillar which makes women fruitful ? " " I," faid the canon, " I am the pillar." 2 " Sponfa quasdam ruRica quae jam in finu Divi Futini virginitatis fus przetextam depofuerat." Faceti^ Facetiarum, p. 277. Thefes inaugurales de Virginihus. 3 Ezekiel, xvi, i 7. Within a few years there has been a confiderable manufadure of thefe objefts in Paris, and it was underllood that they were chiefly exported to Italy, where they were fold in the nunneries. ^ Mulier qualicumque molimine aut per fcipfan aut cum altera fornicans tres 144 ON rHE WORSHIP OF THE Another Penitential of an early date provides for the cafe in which both the women who participated in this ad fhould be nuns ;^ and Burchardus, bifhop of Worms, one of the moft celebrated autho- rities on such fubjefts, defcribes the instrument and ufe of it in greater detail.^ The pradice had evidently loft its religious cha- racter and degenerated into a mere indulgence of the paffions. Antwerp has been defcribed as the Lampfacus of Belgium, and Priapus was, down to a comparatively modern period, its patron faint, under the name of Ters, a word the derivation of which ap- pears to be unknown, but which was identical in meaning with the Greek ^/z^/A^j and the l.Rtm fafcinum. John Goropius Becan, who publiftied a learned treatife on the antiquities of Antwerp in the middle of the fixteenth century, informs us how much this Ters was reverenced in his time by the Antwerpians,efpecially by the women, who invoked it on every occafion when they were taken by fur- prife or fudden fear.^ He ftates that "if they let fall by accident a veffel of earthenware, or ftumbled, or if any unexpected accident caufed them vexation, even the moft refpectable women called aloud annos poeniteat, unum ex his pane et aqua. Cum fanftimoniali per machinam fornicans, annos feptem poeniteat, duos ex his in pane et aqua. Colkaio Antiqu. Canon. Panit. ap. Martene et Durand, Thefaurus Anecdotorum, iv, 52. 1 Mulier qualicumque molimine aut feipfam polluens, aut cum altera fornicans quatuor annos. Sanftimonialis foemina cum fanftimoniali per machinamentum pol- luta, feptem annos. MS. Pcenitent. quoted in Ducange, fub. v. Machinamentum. 2 Fecifti quod quaedam mulieres facere folent, ut faceres quoddam molimen aut machinamentum in modum virilis membri, ad menfuram tus voluntatis, et illud loco verendorum tuorum, aut alterius, cum aliquibus ligaturis colligares, et fornica- tionem faceres cum aliis mulierculis, vel alise eodem inftrumento five alio tecum ? Si fecifti, quinque annos per legitimas ferias poeniteas. Fecifti quod qusdam mulieres facere folent, ut jam fupradidlo molimine, vel alio aliquo machinamento, tu ipfa in te folam faceres fornicationem ? Si fecifti, unum annum per legitimas ferias poeniteas. Burchardi Pcenit. lib. xix, p. 277, 8vo. ed. The holy bifliop appears to have been very intimately acquainted with the whole proceeding. 3 Johannis Goropii Becani Origines Antwerpiana, 1569, lib. i, pp. 26, loi. GENERATIVE POWERS. H5 for the prote(5lion of Priapus under this ohfcenc name." Goropius Becanus adds that there was in his time, over the door of a houfe adjoining the prifon, a ftatue which had been furniHied with a large phallus, then worn away or broken off. Among other writers who mention this ftatueis Abraham Goinitz, whopub- lifhed an account of his travels in France and Belgium, in 163 i,' and he informs us that it was a carving in ftone, about a foot high, with its arms raifed up, and its legs fpread out, and that the phallus had been entirely worn out by the women, who had been in the habit of fcraping it and making a potion of the duft which they drank as a prefervative againft barrennefs. Goinitz further tells us that a figure of Priapus was placed over the entrance gate to the enclofure of the temple of St. Walburgis at Antwerp, which fome antiquaries imagined to have been built on the fite of a temple dedicated to that deity. It appears from thefe writers that, at certain times, the women of Antwerp decorated the phalli of thefe figures with garlands. The ufe of priapic figures as amulets, to be carried on the perfon as prefervatives againft the evil eye and other noxious influences, which we have fpoken of as fo common among the Romans, was certainly continued through the middle ages, and, as we fliall fee prefently, has not entirely difappeared. It was natural enough to believe that if this figure were falutary when merely looked upon, it muft be much more fo when carried conftantly on the perfon. The Romans gave the VlZTCl^ fafcinum^ in old Frenchy>/«^, to the phallic amulet, as well as to the fame figure under other circumftances. It is an objed of which we could hardly expedl to find dired: mention in mediaeval writers, but we meet with examples of the objedt itfelf, ufually made of lead (a proof of its popular charadler), and ranging in date perhaps from the fourteenth to the earlier part of the ^ Golnitzii Itinerarium BeigUo-Gallicum, p. 52. u 146. ON THE IVORSHIP OF THE fixteenth century. As we owe our knowledge of thefe phallic amulets almoft entirely to one collector, M. Forgeais of Paris, who obtained them chiefly from one fource — the river Seine, our prefent acquaintance with them may be confidered as very limited, and we have every reafon for believing that they had been in ufe during the earlier period. We can only illufl:rate this part of the fubjeft by defcribing a few of thefe mediaeval phallic amulets, which are preferved in fome private colle6lions ; and we will firfl: call attention to a feries of objefts, the real purpofe of which appears to be very obfcure. They are fmall leaden tokens or medalets, bearing on the obverfe the figure of the male or female organ, and on the reverfe a crofs, a curious intimation of the adoption of the worfhip of the generative powers among Chriftians. Thefe leaden tokens, found in the river Seine, were firft collected and made known to antiquaries by M. Forgeais, who publifhed examples of them in his work on the leaden figures found in that river.^ We give five examples of the medals of each fex, obverfe and reverfe.^ It will be feen that the phalli on thefe tokens are nearly all furnifhed with wings ; one has a bird's legs and claws ; and on another there is an evident intention to reprefent a bell fufpended to the neck. Thefe charaderiftics fhow either a very difliind: tradition of the forms of the Roman phallic ornament, or an imitation of examples of Roman phalli then exifliing — poffibly the latter. But this is not neceflary, for the bells borne by two examples, given in our next plate, and alfo taken from the collection of M. Forgeais are mediaeval, and not Roman bells, though thefe alfo reprefent well-known ancient forms of treating the fubject. In the firfl:,^ a female is riding upon the phallus, which has men's legs, 1 Notice fur des Plombs Hiftories trouves dans la Seine, et recueillis par Arthur Forgeais. 8vo, Paris, 1858. 2 See our Plate xxxiii. 3 Plate xxxiv. Fig. i. GENERATIVE POWERS. 147 and is held by a bridle. This figure was evidently intended to be attached to the drefs as a brooch, for the pin which fixed it ftill remains on the back. Two other examples^ prefent figures of winged phalli, one with a bell, and the other with the ring remaining from which thebellhasnodoubtbeen broken. One of thefe has the dog's legs. A fourth example'- reprefents an enormous phallus attached to themiddleofa fmall num. In another,'^ which was evidently intended for fufpenfion, probably at the neck, the organs of the two fexes are joined together. Three other leaden fiures,^apparently amulets, which were in the Forgeais colledion, offer a very peculiar variety of form, reprefenting a figure, which we might fuppofe to be a male by its attributes, though it has a very feminine look, and wears the robe and hood of a woman. Its peculiarity confifts in having a phallus before and behind. We have on the fame plate' a ftill more remarkable example ofthe combination ofthecrofs with the emblems of the worfhip of which we are treating, in an objedl found at San Agata di Goti, near Naples, which was formerly in the Beref- ford Fletcher coUeftion, and is now in that of Ambrofe Rufchen- berger, Efq., of Bofton, U. S. It is 2icrux anfata, formed by four phalli, with a circle of female organs round the centre; and appears by the loop to have been intended for fufpenfion. As this crofs is of gold, it had no doubt been made for fome perfonage of rank, poftibly an ecclefiaftic; and we can hardly help fufpeding that it had fome conneftion with priapic ceremonies or feftivities. The laft figure on the fame plate is alfo taken from the colledion of M. Forgeais.^ From the monkifh cowl and the cord round the body, we may perhaps take it for a fatire upon the friars, fome of whom wore no breeches, and they were all charged with being great cor- rupters of female morals. ' Plate XXXIV, Figs. 2 and 3. ^ Plate xxxiv. Fig. 4. 3 Plate XXXIV, Fig. 5. '' Plate xxxv. Figs, i, 2, and 3. 5 Plate xxxv. Fig. 4. "^ Plate xxxv. Fig. 5. 148 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE In Italy we can trace the continuous ufe of thefe phallic amulets down to the prefent time much more diftinftly than in our more Weftern countries. There they are ftill in very common ufe, and we give two examples^ of bronze amulets of this defcription, which are commonly fold in Naples at the prefent day for a carlo, equiva- lent to fourpence in Englifh money, each. One of them, it will be feen, is encircled by a ferpent. So important are thefe amulets confidered for the perfonal fafety of thofe who poffefs them, that there is hardly a peafant who is without one, which he ufually carries in his waiftcoat pocket. There was another, and lefs openly apparent, form of the phallus, which has lafted as an amulet during almoft innumerable ages. The ancients had two forms of what antiquaries have named the phallic hand, one in which the middle finger was extended at length, and the thumb and other fingers doubled up, while in the other the whole hand was clofed, but the thumb was paffed between the firft and middle fingers. The firfl: of thefe forms appears to have been the more ancient, and is understood to have been in- tended to reprefent, by the extended middle finger, the membrum virile^ and by the bent fingers on each fide the tefl:icles. Hence the middle finger of the hand was called by the Romans, digitus impudicus, or infamis. It was called by the Greeks Karairvr^oiv, which had fomewhat the fame meaning as the Latin word, except that it had reference efpecially to degrading prad:ices, which were then lefs concealed than in modern times. To Ihow the hand in this form was exprefled in Greek by the word aKifj,a\t^€Lv, and was confidered as a mofl: contemptuous infult, becaufe it was under- ftood to intimate that the perfon to whom it was addrefi"ed was addicted to unnatural vice. This was the meaning alfo given to it 1 Plate XXXVI, Figs, i and 2. GENERATIVE POWERS. 149 by the Romans, as we learn from the hrft lines of an epigram of Martial: — ♦* Rideto inultum, qui te, Sextille, ciiu-cdum Dixerit, et digiturn porrigito medium.^' Martial, Ep. ii, 28. Neverthelefs, this gefture of the hand was looked upon at an early period as an amulet againft magical influences, and, formed of different materials, it was carried on the perfon in the fame manner as the phallus. It is not an uncommon objed: among Roman an- tiquities, and was adopted by the Gnoftics as one of their fymbolical images. The fecond of thefe forms of the phallic hand, the inten- tion of which is eafily feen (the thumb forming the phallus), was alfo well known among the Romans, and is found made ot various material, fuch as bronze, coral, lapis lazuli, and chryftal, of a fize which was evidently intended to be fufpended to the neck or to fome other part of the perfon. In the Mufee Secret at Naples, there are examples of fuch amulets, in the fhape of two arms joined at the elbow, one terminating in the head of a phallus, the other having a hand arranged in the form juft defcribed, which feem to have been intended for pendents to ladies' ears. This gefture of the hand appears to have been called at a later period of Latin, though we have no knowledge of the date at which this ufe of the word began,/f«j-, a fig. Ficus being a word in the feminine gen- der, appears to have fallen in the popular language into the more common form of feminine nouns,7?crt, out of which arofe the Italian Jica (now replaced hy Jico), the Spanifti higa, and the French figue. Florio, who gives the word/c^, a fig, fays that it was alfo ufed in the fenfe of "a woman's quaint," fo that it may perhaps be clafl'ed with one or two other fruits, fuch as the pomegranate and the apricot, to which a fimilar erotic meaning was given. ^ The form, under 1 See before, p. 1 36. Among the Romans, the fig was confidered as a fruit confecrated to Priapus, on account, it is faid, of its produdivenefs. I50 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE this name, was preferved through the middle ages, efpecially in the South of Europe, where Roman traditions were ftrongeft,both as an amulet and as an infulting geftture. The Italian called this gefture fare la fie a ^ to make or do the fig to any one; the Spaniard, dar una higa^ to give a fig ; and the Frenchman, like the lta.\\a.n, /aire lafigue. We can trace this phrafe back to the thirteenth century at leaft. In the judicial proceedings againft the Templars in Paris in 1309, one of the brethren of the Order was afked, jokingly, in his examination, becaufe he was rather loofe and flippant in his replies, " if he had been ordered by the faid receptor (the officer of the Templars who admitted the new candidate) to make with his fingers the fig at the crucifix." ^ Here the word ufed is the corred: Y.iiXAnficus ; and it is the fame in the plural, in a document of the year 1449, in which an individual is faid to have made figs with both hands at another.^ This phrafe appears to have been introduced into the Englifii language in the time of Elizabeth, and to have been taken from the Spaniards, with whom our relations were then intimate. This we affume from the circumfl:ance that the Englifii phrafe was " to give the fig " [dar la higa)'^ and that the writers of the Elizabethan age call it " the fig of Spain." Thus, " ancient " Pifl:ol, in Shakefpeare : — ** A figo for thy friendfhip ! — The fig of Spain." Henry V, iii. 6. ^ Item, cum prEediftus teftis videretur efl'e valde facilis et procax ad loquendum, et in pluribus diftis fuis non eflet ftabilis, fed quafi varians et vacilans, fuit interro- gatus fi fuit ei prsceptum a difto receptore quod cum digitis manus {w£ faceret ficuni Crucifixo, quando ipfum videret, et fi fuit ei di(^um quod hoc eflet de punftis ordinis, refpondit quod nunquam audivit loqui de hoc. Michelet, Proces des Templiers, Tome i, p. 255, 410. Paris, 1841. 2 Ambabus manibus fecit ficus didlo Sermes. MS. quoted in Ducange, fub v. Ficha. 3 *< Behold next I fee contempt, giving me the fco.'" Wit's Mifery, quoted in Nares, v. Fico. GENERATIVE POWERS. 151 The phrale has been preferved in all thefe countries down to modern times and we ftill fay in Englifh, "a fig for anybody," or" for any- thing," not meaning that we eftimate them at no more than the value of a fig, but that we throw at them that contempt which was intimated by fhowing them the phallic hand, and which the Greeks, as ftated above, called (TKL\ia\it,^Lv. The form of fhowing con- tempt which was called the fig is ftill well known among the lower clafTes of fociety in England, and it is preferved in moft of the countries of Weftern Europe. In Baretti's Spanifh Dicftionary, which belongs to the commencement of the prefent century, we find the word higa interpreted as "A manner of fcofiing at people, which confifts in fhowing the thumb between the firft and fecond finger, clofing the fift, and pointing at the perfon to whom we want to give this hateful mark of contempt." Baretti alfo gives as ftill in ufe the original meaning of the word, " ///g-^, a little hand made of jet, which they hang about children to keep them from evil eyes ; a fuperftitious cuftom." The ufe of this amulet is ftill common in Italy, and efpecially in Naples and Sicily ; it has an advantage over the mere form of the phallus, that when the artificial /^^ is not prefent, an individual, who finds or believes himfelf in fudden danger, can make the amulet with his own fingers. So profound is the belief of its efficacy in Italy, that it is com- monly believed and reported there that, at the battle of Solferino, the king of Italy held his hand in his pocket with this arrange- ment of the fingers as a protedion againft the fliots of the enemy. There were perfonages conneded with the worfhip of Priapus who appear to have been common to the Romans under and before the empire, and to the foreign races who fettled upon its ruins. The Teutonic race believed in a fpiritual being who in- habited the woods, and who was called in old German /rr^/. His charader was more general than that of a mere habitant of the woods, for it anfwered to the Englifh hobgoblin, or to the Irifti 152 ON THE WORSHIP OF THE cluricaune. The fcrat was the fpirit of the woods, under which charad:er he was fometimes called a waltfcrat, and of the fields, and alfo of the houfehold, the domeftic fpirit, the ghoft haunting the houfe. His image was probably looked upon as an amulet, a pro- tedion to the houfe, as an old German vocabulary of the year 1482, explainsy