PRINCETON, N. J.
BV 4253 .T34 1846
Ta il t n.ilt h 2 i±ald Campbe11 '
^.//.....Suggestions offered to the
SUGGESTIONS
OFFERED TO THE THEOLOGICAL STUDENT,
UNDER PRESENT DIFFICULTIES.
FIVE DISCOURSES
PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD.
By A. c/TAIT, D.C.L.,
HEAD MASTER OF RUGBY SCHOOL,
LATE FELLOW AND TDTOR OF BALIOL COLLEGE.
LONDON :
JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET.
1846.
Lately Pitblished, by the same Author,
FIVE SERMONS PREACHED AT OXFORD,
in 1843.
LONDON :
BRADBURY AND EVANS, PKINTKRS, WHITKKR1ARS.
PREFACE.
It is stated in one of the following Sermons,
that there is a mixture of truth in every
attractive error ; and that, therefore, none
can successfully meet such error except those
who understand, and are willing to appreciate,
the truth which is mixed up with it. If a
man would persuade others not to be Roman-
ists, he must know what the truths are on
which the strength of Romanism is built :
if he would persuade them not to adopt what
is commonly, vaguely enough, called Rational-
ism, he must have some acquaintance (the
deeper the better) with the literature and
habits of thought prevalent in that country
to which the system owes its birth. This
seems to be a mere truism. Yet so strange
a 2
iv PREFACE.
are the prejudices which sway even intelligent
and good men, that a very general impression
seems to prevail amongst English Divines,
that the very fact of a writer's showing any
acquaintance with the theology of Germany
may be taken as an a priori indication of
unsoundness. There are of course very few
who would have the boldness to confess that
they entertain so unreasonable an opinion ;
but they who act on this opinion are certainly
not few, and very serious evil may, before we
are aware, be thus done to our Church : for
certainly it is not impossible that young and
ardent minds may be driven, almost against
their will, to look with too much sympathy
upon errors with which they find themselves
unjustly charged.
It is scarcely more than might be expected
from this prejudice if some English writers, who
draw many good thoughts Jrom the Protestant
divines of the Continent, seem not unnatu-
rally to have become unwilling to refer more
PREFACE. V
than is absolutely necessary to the sources to
which they are indebted.
The author of the present volume is deeply
sensible of the very limited range of his
own acquaintance with the Divines who are
thus looked upon with suspicion ; but he has
thought it a duty, in order to protest against
this prejudice, as well as for other reasons,
to refer distinctly to the few of whose assist-
ance he has availed himself. For it is of
much importance that English readers, if
they do not know it already, should learn
that Germany has to boast of writers in
almost every department of theology, who
unite the deepest learning with a sound and
earnest Christian faith ; and that it is to
such writers we shall mainly be indebted, if
the Infidelity which is commonly associated
with the name of their country be smitten
and overthrown. It is indeed much to be
deprecated that these writers should become
directly the guides of the English mind.
VI PREFACE.
They have their German peculiarities ; and
their whole mode of treating subjects is
affected by the controversies which are around
them in their own land. What is wanted
to meet Infidelity in this country is an English
theology, which, fully alive to the peculiar
excellencies of our great national Divines,
shall thankfully avail itself of the labours of
foreigners, while it is still, essentially, our own.
And now a very few words seem required
to explain the connection and bearing of the
following Sermons. Shortly after the author
was appointed to the office of Select Preacher,
and before he had entered on his duties, it
seemed probable to many well acquainted
with the feelings prevalent in Oxford, that
great changes would soon occur in the theo-
logical atmosphere of the place. Symptoms
were not wanting to indicate, that the opinions
which had been for some years dominant
were about to disappear almost as rapidly
as they had sprung up ; while nothing was
PREFACE. Vll
so likely to give them for a time a lingering
hold over the public mind, as those inju-
dicious attempts which are often made to
destroy error by mere protest, without any
efforts to substitute a better system in its
room. Subsequent events have certainly
confirmed the impression that such a change
was approaching, as the erroneous system
alluded to has now, by the publication of
Mr. Newman's Essay, received its death-
blow from the very hand to which it owed
its creation.
The question then naturally occurred, what
ought to be done to guide the minds of
younger students amid that shaking of all
opinions which was likely to follow. It
seemed that the great object ought to be, to
direct attention to some intelligible, enlight-
ened, and well-grounded Protestant system,
which might, by the blessing of God's Spirit,
recal men's minds to the simplicity of the
Gospel, and enable them to take their stand
Vlll PREFACE.
on the theology of the New Testament, amid
the ruins of that baseless traditional teaching
which was crumbling around them.
To effect this, however, must be the work
of time, and is the great duty of those to
whom at this trying juncture the University
entrusts the task of conducting its daily
instructions, and moulding the minds of the
young, through personal intercourse, both by
precept and example.
Meanwhile it became obvious, that, as the
transition-state is always one of great anxiety,
there could be little doubt of the particular
very alarming direction in which thoughtful
minds would be not unlikely at present to
hurry, in escaping from the system which they
had learned to distrust. The teaching of the last
ten years had entirely unsettled men's minds ;
and it was certain that they could not quietly
return to the old channels., A thousand new
thoughts had been suggested to them. New
fields of theological inquiry lay enticingly
PREFACE. IX
open on every side. It might indeed be
hoped that such works as Mr. Trench's
Notes on the Parables, and his subsequently
published Notes on the Miracles, uniting, as
they seem to do, so earnest a zeal for
faithful religion to an inquiring spirit ac-
quainted with the wants and longings of
an intellectual age, would tend to give a
safe direction to the inquiries on which so
many had entered. But no one could doubt
that the prospect was full of danger ; and
that every man who thought he understood
the temptations to which his younger brethren
were exposed, was bound to use all his influ-
ence, if perchance he might benefit them.
The intention of these Sermons then has
been, in connection with the present ten-
dency of men's minds, to offer some few
suggestions which have occurred only at
spare moments in the midst of the claims
of a laborious practical occupation ; but
which it is still hoped may possibly be of
X PREFACE.
use in showing the spirit in which specu-
lative error ought to be met. The object
of their publication will be gained if they
shall be found to have lent any assistance,
however slight, to the efforts of those few
leading spirits who unite an understand-
ing of the present state of feeling in the
rising generation of our divines to a real
knowledge of that attractive theology which,
coming from the early seat of the Refor-
mation, seems likely for good or for evil,
so deeply to affect the highest interests
of our own Church ; and who sanctify their
acuteness and learning by an earnest love
of Gospel truth. Humanly speaking, it is
only to such men, if perchance they may
be found among us, that we can look with
any confidence as fitted to be the guides
of an inquiring age.
School-house, Rugby,
23rd April, 1846.
CONTENTS.
DISCOURSE I.
ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL THE MODEL OF CONTROVERSY.
St. John xx. 31. — "These are written that ye might helieve that
Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might
have life through his name" .......
DISCOURSE II.
VARIETY IN UNITY.
Hebrews xiii. 8. — " Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, to-day, and
for ever" ........ ... 36
DISCOURSE III.
DANGERS AND SAFEGUARDS OF THE CRITICAL
STUDY OF THE BIBLE.
St. John xx. 31. — "These are written, that ye might believe that
Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might
have life through his name" . . . . . . .71
DISCOURSE IV.
DANGERS AND SAFEGUARDS OF THE CRITICAL
STUDY OF THE BIBLE.
PART II.
St. John xx. 31. — "These are written, that ye might believe that
Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might
have life through his name" . . . . . . .91
CONTENTS.
DISCOURSE V.
THEOLOGY, BOTH OLD AND NEW.
2. Timothy iii. 14, 15. — " But continue thou in the things which
thou hast learned, and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou
hast learned them ;
" And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which
are able to make thee wise unto salvation" . . . . . 117
APPENDIX.
GOSPEL FACTS.
Acts x. 39. — " We are witnessess of all things which He did both in
the land of the Jews and in Jerusalem : whom they slew and
hanged on a tree" . ....... 169
II. GOSPEL DOCTRINES.
Philippians ii. 6-8. — " Who, being in the form of God, thought it not
robbery to be equal with God :
" But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of
a servant, and was made in the likeness of men :
" And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and
became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross" . 179
/
^AA***
? C " '<* 188,
DISCOURSE I.
ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL THE MODEL OF
CONTROVERSY.
St. John xx. 31.
These are written that ye might believe that Jesus is the
Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might have
life through his name."
^HIS is St. John's own account of the ob-
ject with which he composed his Gospel.
It is doubtful whether we have distinct his-
torical grounds for attributing to him any
other motive. The well-known assertion of
Irenseus,* that the Apostle was induced to
write by his desire to oppose the errors of
Cerinthus and the Nicolaitans, has been
* I would refer to Lucke's Commentary (Bonn. 1840), ch. iii.,
in which is collected the testimony of antiquity on the facts
here mentioned. Any reader of Lucke will see how largely
throughout this sermon I have availed myself of his suggestions.
2 st. John's gospel [discourse i.
repeated by a chain of early authors, but
with such slight variations in the name of
the prevailing heresy, as seem to endanger
the claims of this tradition to any great
historical or chronological accuracy. It is
well known that Clement of Alexandria,
as quoted by Eusebius * has asserted, that
St. John wrote in order to fill up the defi-
ciencies of the other Evangelists, by the
publication of a more spiritual gospel. And
Eusebius f has recorded his own opinion, that
St. John, having this completion of the Gos-
pel-history in view, effected his object chiefly
by a detailed account of the events which
happened between our Lord's birth and the
imprisonment of the Baptist. This opinion
of Eusebius is sanctioned by Jerome,! but not
to the exclusion of the polemical object to
which Irenseus points.
Now it will be found on examination, that
probably, as has been well observed, § these
several statements rest rather on an exe-
* Euseb. H. E. vi. 14. t Ibid. iii. 24.
% De Vir. Illust. 9. § Lucke's Comment, vol. i. p. 189.
discourse I.] THE MODEL OF CONTROVERSY. 3
getical than on any historical or even tra-
ditionary basis. I mean that most, if not
all of these writers (as is clearly the case
with Eusebius) were not so much recording
facts which history told them as to the
object of St. John, but rather bringing for-
ward conjectures, which they naturally
formed for themselves from the study of
his Gospel, and from their observation of
the uses to which it was obviously capable
of being applied.
It is not at all intended that these writers
ought not to have formed such conjectures,
or that there is any inconsistency between
their statements and that of the Apostle
himself in our text. When St. John says of
his Gospel, that it was written that those
to whom it was addressed might "believe
that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God,
and that believing they might have life
through His name," he attributes to himself
a motive which must equally have influenced
the other three Evangelists ; for all, in obe-
dience to their Saviour's last command, had
B 2
4 ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [discourse i.
devoted their lives to the salvation of their
brethren. It was natural for the early
readers of St. John's Gospel, as it is for us, to
seek some further explanation of its marked
peculiarities. What we have now to note is,
that apparently the earliest writers, what-
ever reference they may at first sight appear
to make to certain outward traditions, did
in reality in this matter seek rather for
the solution of their difficulty in that
intelligent examination of the book itself,
illustrated by the known history of the
times, to which sound biblical criticism has
ever pointed as the best guide, when used
humbly in dependence on the Spirit of God.
for enabling us to understand his word.
If we endeavour then ourselves, aided by
the suggestions of those early writers, so to
examine St. John's Gospel, that it may as
it were speak for itself, and tell us of its
object, we shall probably come to the con-
clusion that this object was threefold. First,
It may be doubtful, as a matter of history,
whether the Apostle wrote with any distinct
discourse I.] THE MODEL OF CONTROVERSY.
especial reference to the particular heresy
of Cerinthus; but heresies like that of
Cerinthus he had undoubtedly to oppose.
Secondly, He knew that the best way to
oppose these heresies was by writing an
account of our Lord's life, more distinctly
spiritual than the histories of the three
Evangelists who had gone before him. And,
Thirdly, As the new errors which had arisen
had called for a new gospel, it followed, of
course, that the points of view from which
he was now to survey the history, and the
discourses as well as incidents which he
must of necessity introduce in illustration
of these views, must make his work for the
most part supplementary to the writings of
his three predecessors.
This account of St. John's threefold object
in the composition of his Gospel — uniting
the three early opinions into one whole —
has at least the merit of giving an obvious
explanation of each of its marked pecu-
liarities. I believe, also, that a patient
examination of the whole book will confirm
6 ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [discourse i.
our supposition as to the gradation accord-
ing to which the members of this threefold
object ought to be ranked. The Apostle's
main object then is, in the best sense of
the word, polemical. His work, being po-
lemical, naturally dwells on those spiritual
doctrines which are the true antagonists of
the errors he confutes; and the form of a
supplementary narrative of the Lord's life
and teaching was wisely selected as the best
vehicle for confuting erroneous doctrine, by
its striking exhibition of positive truth in
his heavenly words and deeds.
Taking then this to be the true account
of the object of St. John's Gospel, I propose
to examine how far the book may be rightly
regarded as the Divine model, which the
Holy Spirit has given to Christians to direct
them in their struggles with erroneous
teaching : —
I. First of all let us note, that there was
much in the circumstances and character of
the beloved Apostle which pointed him out
more than his fellow-disciples as the man
discourse i.] THE MODEL OF CONTROVERSY.
best suited to be the champion of truth
against these growing errors.
1. St. John must have been acknowledged,
even by his opponents, to be more likely
than any other Apostle to be well acquainted
with the true doctrine of his Master.
It is not of course meant that there is
really any ground for drawing distinctions
between the different degrees of heavenly
illumination with which the Apostles were
enlightened ; but such distinctions were
drawn by heretics at a very early time. To
attempt to draw these distinctions is in-
deed the sure way to shake the foundations
of our faith, by raising questions as to the
degree of deference which we owe to each
inspired authority; while both the sacred
writers themselves * and, more distinctly, the
wisest uninspired Christians in all ages,
following their example, have regarded the
New Testament as one whole, the several
parts of which God's providence did from
time to time cause to be added to the
* 2 Peter, iii. 15, 16.
8 ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [discourse i.
already existing canon of the Old Testa-
ment, while the new works, as they were
successively written, became invested with
the same majesty of an unquestioned au-
thority as belonged to the ypaia kcu Kzvrj diraTri, of
which St. Paul says that it was according to
the tradition of men and the elements of
the world, and not, like the true yvao-is, accord-
ing to Christ. f
St. John then, as we have already said, pre-
sents the true yi/oW, as the only effectual an-
tagonist by which the false is to be combated.
Men dissatisfied with all the systems of con-
tracted religion which the world presented,
were seeking a true philosophic religion suit-
able for all countries, and free from the
restraints which confined it to one sacred
time or place. Hear then St. John repeating
the Lord's words : " The hour cometh when
ye shall neither in this mountain nor yet at
* 2 Cor. xii. 8. t Col. ii. 8.
24 ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [discourse i.
Jerusalem worship the Father — The hour
cometh and now is when the true worship-
pers shall worship the Father in spirit and
in truth, for the Father seeketh such to wor-
ship him. — God is a spirit, and they that
worship him, must worship him in spirit and
in truth." *
Again, men who wished to exalt those very
debased notions of the Godhead, in which
the heathen were sunk, and yet to re-
concile the idea of the Almighty's exalted
majesty with the belief of some divine super-
intendence over this lower world, represented
the Eternal Father as withdrawn altogether
from any direct interference with mankind,
and imagined for themselves those succes-
sions of emanating spirits, who formed as it
were a connecting link between the Father
and His universe.f Now, compare St. John's
* John iv. 21, 23.
t The difficulty which gave rise to this doctrine seems well
illustrated in the comparison between the Almighty's supremacj*
and that of the great king, set forth in the 6th ch. of the
treatise irepl k6ww\^:.r
•Hiiiiiiiii!
Princeton Theological Seminary-Speer Library
1 1012 01032 8443
iii
ill i
fill'
II!
I
'^fiiiiiiiiiK
I lliil
II
i I
Nijlliii
lilill