PRINCETON, N. J. BV 4253 .T34 1846 Ta il t n.ilt h 2 i±ald Campbe11 ' ^.//.....Suggestions offered to the SUGGESTIONS OFFERED TO THE THEOLOGICAL STUDENT, UNDER PRESENT DIFFICULTIES. FIVE DISCOURSES PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD. By A. c/TAIT, D.C.L., HEAD MASTER OF RUGBY SCHOOL, LATE FELLOW AND TDTOR OF BALIOL COLLEGE. LONDON : JOHN MURRAY, ALBEMARLE STREET. 1846. Lately Pitblished, by the same Author, FIVE SERMONS PREACHED AT OXFORD, in 1843. LONDON : BRADBURY AND EVANS, PKINTKRS, WHITKKR1ARS. PREFACE. It is stated in one of the following Sermons, that there is a mixture of truth in every attractive error ; and that, therefore, none can successfully meet such error except those who understand, and are willing to appreciate, the truth which is mixed up with it. If a man would persuade others not to be Roman- ists, he must know what the truths are on which the strength of Romanism is built : if he would persuade them not to adopt what is commonly, vaguely enough, called Rational- ism, he must have some acquaintance (the deeper the better) with the literature and habits of thought prevalent in that country to which the system owes its birth. This seems to be a mere truism. Yet so strange a 2 iv PREFACE. are the prejudices which sway even intelligent and good men, that a very general impression seems to prevail amongst English Divines, that the very fact of a writer's showing any acquaintance with the theology of Germany may be taken as an a priori indication of unsoundness. There are of course very few who would have the boldness to confess that they entertain so unreasonable an opinion ; but they who act on this opinion are certainly not few, and very serious evil may, before we are aware, be thus done to our Church : for certainly it is not impossible that young and ardent minds may be driven, almost against their will, to look with too much sympathy upon errors with which they find themselves unjustly charged. It is scarcely more than might be expected from this prejudice if some English writers, who draw many good thoughts Jrom the Protestant divines of the Continent, seem not unnatu- rally to have become unwilling to refer more PREFACE. V than is absolutely necessary to the sources to which they are indebted. The author of the present volume is deeply sensible of the very limited range of his own acquaintance with the Divines who are thus looked upon with suspicion ; but he has thought it a duty, in order to protest against this prejudice, as well as for other reasons, to refer distinctly to the few of whose assist- ance he has availed himself. For it is of much importance that English readers, if they do not know it already, should learn that Germany has to boast of writers in almost every department of theology, who unite the deepest learning with a sound and earnest Christian faith ; and that it is to such writers we shall mainly be indebted, if the Infidelity which is commonly associated with the name of their country be smitten and overthrown. It is indeed much to be deprecated that these writers should become directly the guides of the English mind. VI PREFACE. They have their German peculiarities ; and their whole mode of treating subjects is affected by the controversies which are around them in their own land. What is wanted to meet Infidelity in this country is an English theology, which, fully alive to the peculiar excellencies of our great national Divines, shall thankfully avail itself of the labours of foreigners, while it is still, essentially, our own. And now a very few words seem required to explain the connection and bearing of the following Sermons. Shortly after the author was appointed to the office of Select Preacher, and before he had entered on his duties, it seemed probable to many well acquainted with the feelings prevalent in Oxford, that great changes would soon occur in the theo- logical atmosphere of the place. Symptoms were not wanting to indicate, that the opinions which had been for some years dominant were about to disappear almost as rapidly as they had sprung up ; while nothing was PREFACE. Vll so likely to give them for a time a lingering hold over the public mind, as those inju- dicious attempts which are often made to destroy error by mere protest, without any efforts to substitute a better system in its room. Subsequent events have certainly confirmed the impression that such a change was approaching, as the erroneous system alluded to has now, by the publication of Mr. Newman's Essay, received its death- blow from the very hand to which it owed its creation. The question then naturally occurred, what ought to be done to guide the minds of younger students amid that shaking of all opinions which was likely to follow. It seemed that the great object ought to be, to direct attention to some intelligible, enlight- ened, and well-grounded Protestant system, which might, by the blessing of God's Spirit, recal men's minds to the simplicity of the Gospel, and enable them to take their stand Vlll PREFACE. on the theology of the New Testament, amid the ruins of that baseless traditional teaching which was crumbling around them. To effect this, however, must be the work of time, and is the great duty of those to whom at this trying juncture the University entrusts the task of conducting its daily instructions, and moulding the minds of the young, through personal intercourse, both by precept and example. Meanwhile it became obvious, that, as the transition-state is always one of great anxiety, there could be little doubt of the particular very alarming direction in which thoughtful minds would be not unlikely at present to hurry, in escaping from the system which they had learned to distrust. The teaching of the last ten years had entirely unsettled men's minds ; and it was certain that they could not quietly return to the old channels., A thousand new thoughts had been suggested to them. New fields of theological inquiry lay enticingly PREFACE. IX open on every side. It might indeed be hoped that such works as Mr. Trench's Notes on the Parables, and his subsequently published Notes on the Miracles, uniting, as they seem to do, so earnest a zeal for faithful religion to an inquiring spirit ac- quainted with the wants and longings of an intellectual age, would tend to give a safe direction to the inquiries on which so many had entered. But no one could doubt that the prospect was full of danger ; and that every man who thought he understood the temptations to which his younger brethren were exposed, was bound to use all his influ- ence, if perchance he might benefit them. The intention of these Sermons then has been, in connection with the present ten- dency of men's minds, to offer some few suggestions which have occurred only at spare moments in the midst of the claims of a laborious practical occupation ; but which it is still hoped may possibly be of X PREFACE. use in showing the spirit in which specu- lative error ought to be met. The object of their publication will be gained if they shall be found to have lent any assistance, however slight, to the efforts of those few leading spirits who unite an understand- ing of the present state of feeling in the rising generation of our divines to a real knowledge of that attractive theology which, coming from the early seat of the Refor- mation, seems likely for good or for evil, so deeply to affect the highest interests of our own Church ; and who sanctify their acuteness and learning by an earnest love of Gospel truth. Humanly speaking, it is only to such men, if perchance they may be found among us, that we can look with any confidence as fitted to be the guides of an inquiring age. School-house, Rugby, 23rd April, 1846. CONTENTS. DISCOURSE I. ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL THE MODEL OF CONTROVERSY. St. John xx. 31. — "These are written that ye might helieve that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might have life through his name" ....... DISCOURSE II. VARIETY IN UNITY. Hebrews xiii. 8. — " Jesus Christ, the same yesterday, to-day, and for ever" ........ ... 36 DISCOURSE III. DANGERS AND SAFEGUARDS OF THE CRITICAL STUDY OF THE BIBLE. St. John xx. 31. — "These are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might have life through his name" . . . . . . .71 DISCOURSE IV. DANGERS AND SAFEGUARDS OF THE CRITICAL STUDY OF THE BIBLE. PART II. St. John xx. 31. — "These are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might have life through his name" . . . . . . .91 CONTENTS. DISCOURSE V. THEOLOGY, BOTH OLD AND NEW. 2. Timothy iii. 14, 15. — " But continue thou in the things which thou hast learned, and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them ; " And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation" . . . . . 117 APPENDIX. GOSPEL FACTS. Acts x. 39. — " We are witnessess of all things which He did both in the land of the Jews and in Jerusalem : whom they slew and hanged on a tree" . ....... 169 II. GOSPEL DOCTRINES. Philippians ii. 6-8. — " Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God : " But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men : " And being found in fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the death of the cross" . 179 / ^AA*** ? C " '<* 188, DISCOURSE I. ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL THE MODEL OF CONTROVERSY. St. John xx. 31. These are written that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing ye might have life through his name." ^HIS is St. John's own account of the ob- ject with which he composed his Gospel. It is doubtful whether we have distinct his- torical grounds for attributing to him any other motive. The well-known assertion of Irenseus,* that the Apostle was induced to write by his desire to oppose the errors of Cerinthus and the Nicolaitans, has been * I would refer to Lucke's Commentary (Bonn. 1840), ch. iii., in which is collected the testimony of antiquity on the facts here mentioned. Any reader of Lucke will see how largely throughout this sermon I have availed myself of his suggestions. 2 st. John's gospel [discourse i. repeated by a chain of early authors, but with such slight variations in the name of the prevailing heresy, as seem to endanger the claims of this tradition to any great historical or chronological accuracy. It is well known that Clement of Alexandria, as quoted by Eusebius * has asserted, that St. John wrote in order to fill up the defi- ciencies of the other Evangelists, by the publication of a more spiritual gospel. And Eusebius f has recorded his own opinion, that St. John, having this completion of the Gos- pel-history in view, effected his object chiefly by a detailed account of the events which happened between our Lord's birth and the imprisonment of the Baptist. This opinion of Eusebius is sanctioned by Jerome,! but not to the exclusion of the polemical object to which Irenseus points. Now it will be found on examination, that probably, as has been well observed, § these several statements rest rather on an exe- * Euseb. H. E. vi. 14. t Ibid. iii. 24. % De Vir. Illust. 9. § Lucke's Comment, vol. i. p. 189. discourse I.] THE MODEL OF CONTROVERSY. 3 getical than on any historical or even tra- ditionary basis. I mean that most, if not all of these writers (as is clearly the case with Eusebius) were not so much recording facts which history told them as to the object of St. John, but rather bringing for- ward conjectures, which they naturally formed for themselves from the study of his Gospel, and from their observation of the uses to which it was obviously capable of being applied. It is not at all intended that these writers ought not to have formed such conjectures, or that there is any inconsistency between their statements and that of the Apostle himself in our text. When St. John says of his Gospel, that it was written that those to whom it was addressed might "believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing they might have life through His name," he attributes to himself a motive which must equally have influenced the other three Evangelists ; for all, in obe- dience to their Saviour's last command, had B 2 4 ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [discourse i. devoted their lives to the salvation of their brethren. It was natural for the early readers of St. John's Gospel, as it is for us, to seek some further explanation of its marked peculiarities. What we have now to note is, that apparently the earliest writers, what- ever reference they may at first sight appear to make to certain outward traditions, did in reality in this matter seek rather for the solution of their difficulty in that intelligent examination of the book itself, illustrated by the known history of the times, to which sound biblical criticism has ever pointed as the best guide, when used humbly in dependence on the Spirit of God. for enabling us to understand his word. If we endeavour then ourselves, aided by the suggestions of those early writers, so to examine St. John's Gospel, that it may as it were speak for itself, and tell us of its object, we shall probably come to the con- clusion that this object was threefold. First, It may be doubtful, as a matter of history, whether the Apostle wrote with any distinct discourse I.] THE MODEL OF CONTROVERSY. especial reference to the particular heresy of Cerinthus; but heresies like that of Cerinthus he had undoubtedly to oppose. Secondly, He knew that the best way to oppose these heresies was by writing an account of our Lord's life, more distinctly spiritual than the histories of the three Evangelists who had gone before him. And, Thirdly, As the new errors which had arisen had called for a new gospel, it followed, of course, that the points of view from which he was now to survey the history, and the discourses as well as incidents which he must of necessity introduce in illustration of these views, must make his work for the most part supplementary to the writings of his three predecessors. This account of St. John's threefold object in the composition of his Gospel — uniting the three early opinions into one whole — has at least the merit of giving an obvious explanation of each of its marked pecu- liarities. I believe, also, that a patient examination of the whole book will confirm 6 ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [discourse i. our supposition as to the gradation accord- ing to which the members of this threefold object ought to be ranked. The Apostle's main object then is, in the best sense of the word, polemical. His work, being po- lemical, naturally dwells on those spiritual doctrines which are the true antagonists of the errors he confutes; and the form of a supplementary narrative of the Lord's life and teaching was wisely selected as the best vehicle for confuting erroneous doctrine, by its striking exhibition of positive truth in his heavenly words and deeds. Taking then this to be the true account of the object of St. John's Gospel, I propose to examine how far the book may be rightly regarded as the Divine model, which the Holy Spirit has given to Christians to direct them in their struggles with erroneous teaching : — I. First of all let us note, that there was much in the circumstances and character of the beloved Apostle which pointed him out more than his fellow-disciples as the man discourse i.] THE MODEL OF CONTROVERSY. best suited to be the champion of truth against these growing errors. 1. St. John must have been acknowledged, even by his opponents, to be more likely than any other Apostle to be well acquainted with the true doctrine of his Master. It is not of course meant that there is really any ground for drawing distinctions between the different degrees of heavenly illumination with which the Apostles were enlightened ; but such distinctions were drawn by heretics at a very early time. To attempt to draw these distinctions is in- deed the sure way to shake the foundations of our faith, by raising questions as to the degree of deference which we owe to each inspired authority; while both the sacred writers themselves * and, more distinctly, the wisest uninspired Christians in all ages, following their example, have regarded the New Testament as one whole, the several parts of which God's providence did from time to time cause to be added to the * 2 Peter, iii. 15, 16. 8 ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [discourse i. already existing canon of the Old Testa- ment, while the new works, as they were successively written, became invested with the same majesty of an unquestioned au- thority as belonged to the ypaia kcu Kzvrj diraTri, of which St. Paul says that it was according to the tradition of men and the elements of the world, and not, like the true yvao-is, accord- ing to Christ. f St. John then, as we have already said, pre- sents the true yi/oW, as the only effectual an- tagonist by which the false is to be combated. Men dissatisfied with all the systems of con- tracted religion which the world presented, were seeking a true philosophic religion suit- able for all countries, and free from the restraints which confined it to one sacred time or place. Hear then St. John repeating the Lord's words : " The hour cometh when ye shall neither in this mountain nor yet at * 2 Cor. xii. 8. t Col. ii. 8. 24 ST. JOHN'S GOSPEL [discourse i. Jerusalem worship the Father — The hour cometh and now is when the true worship- pers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth, for the Father seeketh such to wor- ship him. — God is a spirit, and they that worship him, must worship him in spirit and in truth." * Again, men who wished to exalt those very debased notions of the Godhead, in which the heathen were sunk, and yet to re- concile the idea of the Almighty's exalted majesty with the belief of some divine super- intendence over this lower world, represented the Eternal Father as withdrawn altogether from any direct interference with mankind, and imagined for themselves those succes- sions of emanating spirits, who formed as it were a connecting link between the Father and His universe.f Now, compare St. John's * John iv. 21, 23. t The difficulty which gave rise to this doctrine seems well illustrated in the comparison between the Almighty's supremacj* and that of the great king, set forth in the 6th ch. of the treatise irepl k6