L I B R A R Y PRIWCETOW, JV. J. DONATION OF S A M U E I i A ( i N E W , Li iter 91-3 HfllLAUKLPHlA. V .\ . .W Zl IU .^t-. i*tj/ *"^~- -'zz5>&< Case. Divisior Shelf, \ Book, iQ*L. A VINDICATION Of the WORSHIP of the LORD JESUS CHRIST A S T H E Supreme God 5 In all the Difpenfations, Tatriarchal, Afofaick and Chrijlian. DEMONSTRATING, That CHRIST was fo known and worfhip'd in all Ages, from Adam to this Day. Ifaiah xlv. 24. All that are incensed againjl hirajball he ajbam^d. 1 John ii. 23. Whofoever denieth the Son^ the fame hath not the Father, Ignatii Ep. ad Antiochenos, TJai ovv o V w (fe '„ By G. De Gols, Re<3or of St. Teters at Sandwich. LONDON, Printed by J.Darby and T.Browne in Bartho- lomew-Clofe^ and fold by Arthur Bettes- worth in tpater-nofter-Row, and JacobSilveb* Bookfeller in Sandwich. M.DCC.XXV1. (Hi) t9»tsvm if i »st6 To the Right Honourable Peter Lord King, Baron of Ockhani, and Lord High Chancellor of Great Britain. My Lord, HE Occajion of this Treat ife was given by Mr. Staunton, a Gentle- man late of the Chancery ; and that is the Reafon of my offering it to the Lord High Chan- cellor. If the Trefumption be too great, from one whofe Terfon (if not Name) is altogether unknown to Ton, let the Sublimity of the Subject be his Apology. That, my Lord, is worthy of your Regard. Defender of the Faith is none of the leaft Titles that adorn the Britiih Diadem j and A z we iv Dedication. we have Reafbn to blefs God that his Ma- jefiy, our moji gracious Sovereign, not only frofejfes the Faith of 'Christ, the Supreme God, but defends it too, is the Guardian at home, and the Refuge to the Terfecuted a- broad. 'Difdain not, my Lord, thefe Sheets ; J was the more ready to infcribe them to Tou, becaufe Tou ttnderfiand thefe Matters, Tou believe the Scriptures ; and it is certainly as honourable to defend the Honour and Adora- tion of Tour God and Saviour, as to do Jufiice among Men. ^Pardon this Addrefs, and believe that the Liberty I have taken is only to exprefs my Veneration for Tour great Chara6ler. May God be your Guide here, and your great Reward hereafter. I am, My Lord, Tour Lordfhifs Mojl Obedient Humble Servant ; Sandwich, April 10. G. De Gols. (v) mmmm^mm^m A LIST of the Subscribers to this Book. A. HE Right Honourable the Lady Dowa- ger Abergavenny Junior. Captain Ay on* B. SIR William Boys, Knight, and M D. of Can* terbury. 6 Books. Jofiah Burcbet Efq; Member of Parliament for the Port of Sandwich. 10. The Reverend Mr. John Benfon of Sandwich. 1 5. The Reverend Mr. John Benfon of Chertfey in Surry. 6. The Rev. Mr. Theodorus Boulten, Minifter of the Dutch Church in Auftin-Fryars> London. Arnold Boat Beirman, M. D. Mrs. Burchet. Richard Br ocas Efq; Mr. Robert Brook of Margate in Kent. 6. Mrs. Anne Barker. Mrs. Deborah Beane. Mr. Nathaniel Benfon. Mr. William Benfon. Mr. John Bonhom* Mr. William Browning of Canterbury. Mr. Jafper Ayris Barradeh a 3 c. vi Subfcribers Names. William Cunningham Efq; 6. William Court hope of Stodmarjh- Court in Kent Efq; The Reverend Mr. Campredon 7 Re&or of Sibber dfwold and Coldred in Kent. William Cony Efq; Dr. William Cockburn. 3 . Cape. John Cricket, Jurat of Sandwich. 6, Mr. Peter Cricket, Jurat of Sandwich. Mr. j^/z C/ara of St. Alphage, Canterbury. Mr. John Carder , Phyfician, Mr. William Culvir* Mr. George Curlin* Mr. James Cocky, D. TH E Honourable Brigadier General Dafaeel Sir Thomas U Aeth of Knowlton in £02*, Bart. Sir Matthew Decker, Bart, 1 4. Conrade De Gols Efq; 10. The Rev. Mr. Deering, Vicar of Charing in £ifff f The Rev. y, Desfray A. M. Re&or of jVhy Romny* Mrs. Cornelia De Gols. ' Mr. William De Gols, Not. Publ. Mrs. ytee Z> Laune. Mr. Gabriel Drajfon, M R. yj&B Bwif. Mr. 7o#« Edwards, F. SIR .Roto* F*rw/& of Walderfiare in Kent y Bart, Member of Parliament. <5. Mr. Edward fellow, Jurat of Sandwich. JLieut, 7'3J»ej F^ow, Mrs, Subfcribers Names. vii Mrs. Fielding. Mr. Benjamin Fifier, Jurat, and Collector of the Cuftoms at Sandwich. G. JOHNGafcoyn Efq; Mr. John Gardner. yix.Lidcot Gill of Dover* H. William Hamilton Efq; Capt. Charles Hardy. The Rev. Mr. Hobs, Re&or of St. James's at Dover. Mr. 3^£h Hayward, Jurat of Sandwich. Mr. John Hay ward jun. Town-Clerk of Sandwich. Mr. 'Thomas Hayward. Mrs. Sufannah Hafford. Mrs. Miry Howdel. Mr. Ofwald Hoskins. Mr. Holbourne of Margate in &»*. 5. Mr. William Hughs. Wit. Valentine Hyle of Finglefom. Mr. Richard Humerden. I. MR. j^£w jtefe, Jurat of Sandwich. Mrs, ^tee 7^/» of St. Martins-Hill near Gz^r^/rj'. Mr. 3M>« Jordan. Mr. 3Wte y«ft K. JOHN Kelly Efq; Mayor of Sandwich. Mr. 3to £ej^, Draper. Mr. JFtfite /&>*, Jurat of Sandwich. Mr* GWfo Knowler, Apothecary at Canterbury^ L. yiii Subfcribers Names. L. GEORGE Lewin Efq; Mr. John Loyd- Mr. Richard Lad of Knowhon in Kent. Mr. Stephen Long. M. Robert Mm/herd of Hills- Court in ^S in /&»* Efq; Salmon Morris of Bettejhanger in £>jtf Efq; The Rev. Mr. Maquin, Re&or of St. Mary's Dover* The Rev. Mr. John Martin, Re&or of St. Clements at Sandwich. The Rev. Mr.j^w Minet, Redor of Eythorne in Kent. Mr. Thomas Matthew. Mr. 3^w/»& Efq; Mr. j^o/?» Par amor. Mr. Arthur Perfe. Mr. Thomas Piercefon. Mr. jfo/w Probert. Mr. .ffirary Alexander Primrofe> Merchant at Ztetf/. Mr. Subfcribers Names. ix Mr. Purnel, Officer of the Cuitoms at Margate. Mr. Nicolas Packer. R. TH E Rev. Mr. Jojhua Richard/on, Redor of AB- hallows, Lond n- Wall. Mr. Samuel R < binjon* 6. Mr. George Render, Merchant of Ramfgate. S. SI R Richard Sandys of Northbourn in Kent Bart. William Smith Efq; of Sandwich in Kent. Dr. Sprat, Jurat of Sandwich. Major Shelvy, Jurat of Sandwich- The Rev. Mr.^ck, Redor of Folkflone in &**• The Rev. Mr. George Smith, Redor of Barfreflone in Kent The Rev. Mr. William Sprakelingy Vicar of Elmfted in &»?. Mr '. Benjamin Shrupfel. Mr. John Silkwood. Mr. Richard Solly, Jurat of Sandzvich. Mr. j^co£ SiZ^r, Bookfeller in Sandwich. 6. Mr. 5^/?# Somerfet. Mrs. Srt77z& Spencer. Mr. Thomas Sprat, of Lenham in &>/#. Mr. Alexander Smith of Z)^/. £• Mr. Stanly, of Shouldew Bank in K«tf. MR. Richard Thomfon. Mr. W^fflwi 7ow/i»j. Mrs. Mzry Thorni croft* Mrs. Dorcas Thorni crofi. x Subfcrtbers Names. u. JOHN Verrier Efq; Mr. Benjamin Verrier. W. THE Right Honourable the Earl of m£ chelfea. 2. The Rev. Thomas Wife, D. D. Prebendary of Lincoln, and Chaplain to her Royal Highnefs the Princefs of Wales. The Rev. H. Wood, A. M. Curate oihidd in Kent- Mr. Thomas Watts. Mr. Robert Webber* Mr. James White of Deal. Mr. George Woodeway. Y« MR. Thomas Toung* Mr. JFafc fta^. THE THE CONTENTS. HE Introdu&ion, The great Boldnefs of the Socinians in printing and publifhing profane Tracls againjl the Chriftian Religion, and the Worfhip of Chrift. Page I. Chap. I. Mr. Staunton** Proportion borrowed from Socinus, ivith an Account of the Controverfy between Socinus and Fr. Da- vides. 7. Chap. II. The Objecl of Religious Worfhip, and why God is to be worfhip' d. \ 2. Chap. III. God alone the Objecl of Adoration. 18. Chap. IV. The Worflnp of God, what it is. 23. Chap. V. Divine Worfhip due to Chrift, who is the true God. 2*5. His Divinity prov d from the divine Names given to Chrift. 30. From the Divine Attributes pertaining to Chrift, 46. From the Divine Works afcrWd. to Chrift. 52. Chap. VI. Pofitive Precepts of Scripture to worfhip Chrift as God. 71. Faith and Reliance. 7 $ . Love. 76. Honour. 77. Service and Obedience. 82. Chrift not the Cbjecl of Fear, but Love, 83. Prayer required in the Old Teftament. 84. Prayer no new Precept of Chrifi's. 87. Chap. VII. Chrift worfhip" d as God by Angels and Men. 90. The Appearances of God in the Old Teftament, by Mamre, or Word, or Logos. 91. Logos or Word' explain* d; u fed for a divine P erf on by Jews and Gentiles, before and after St. John. 92. Chap VIII. chrift worfloip'd by the Patriarchs from Adam to Mofes, and their Altars erecled to him. 104. Chap. IX. Chrift worftnp'd as the fupreme God under the Mofaick Difpenfation. 13L Chrift CONTENTS. Chrijl Jejus was the God of the Covenant 'with the Jews, 1 $5. Chrijl dwelt in the Tabernacle as God and King of the Jewijh Church. I $ ?• Chrijl was the Guardian God of Ifrael in the Wildernefs. 142. The Jewijh Church . clajf. 5. arg. 14, Nos ingenue pro- fitemur fententiam noftram de Chrifti natura, five eflentia, adver- fari omnibus fcripturae interpretibus, quorum fcripta ad noftram aetatem pervenere. f Racov. Catech. de perfona Chrifti, c. i. f 4. ^ Dixeris do- minum Jefum natura effe hominem, an idem habet naturam divinam > Refp. Nequaquam. Nam id non folum rationi fans, verum etiam diyinis Uteris repugnat. B 4 laft 8 ffle Tropojinon borrow d Chap, i , laft concluded he ougiit not. But fearing to difclofe fo monftrous a Tenet, he fafd at fir/1; that it was an indifferent thing ; for writing to the Minifters of c f,anj)l e vania he fays *, That we are not command- ed any where in Scripture to pray to Chrift : That we may indeed do it, and lawfully too f, but we are not by virtue of any Law or Precept bound to do it. After that he went one ftep farther, and afferted that it was needlefs to pray to Chrift ; for fo he fays directly j| : If any one be endowed with fo much Faith as to dare immediately and di- rectly toaddrefsGod himfelf, and does not ftand in need o^ that Confolation which flows from the In- vocation of Chrift his Brother, who was tempted in all things, he has no need, there is no neceflity that he fhould pray to Chrift. This at hVft ftartled feveral of his Difciples, but at length they were of his Opinion, that if Chrift was not God, he was not to be worfhipp'd : And of thefe F/ancifcus Davides was the firft that refusM to pray to Chrift, or yield him any Worfhip. Budnaus^ Chriftian F'anken y and others, join'd with Davides> and defended his Thefes, That Chrift was not to be worfliipp'd, if he was not God; and that they would not do it. Hereupon the mod illuftrious Prince oilranfylva' via, Chriftopher Bathoratis^ caft Davides in Prifon, Anno 1580, where he died in a moft raging Dif- traction **. When he was imprifoned, Socinus y from * Socin. ad Minifl. Tranfyl. At nullum extat in facris Uteris pracceptum de Chrifto invocando. f Ibid. Poife nos jure Chriftum invocnre, non tamen id facere teneri. Et ad Nkmojeviuin, refp, ^. Nullo jure cogimur. || Socin. refp. adJViek. torn. 1. p, <>$8. col. 1. Quod fi quis tanta eft fide pra?ditus, ut ad Deum ipfum perpetuo rette accedere au- deat, nee confolatione, qu. 77. CHAP. XI CHAP. II. Of the ObjeEi of Adoration. Ere are two Things to be proved : Firft, That God is the Object of Ado- ration and Worfhip. Secondly, That God alone is the Object of Divine Worihip. Firft, God is the ObjeEl of Adoration and Worjhip. All Men that have any Notion or Knowledge of a divine Being, acknowledge that that divine Be- ing is to be worfhipped. The Light of Nature taught the Gentiles, that the Worfhip and Adoration they paid to any Be- ing was upon the account of its Divinity, of fome divine Spirit redding in that Being, for that nothing but a divine Nature was worthy or capa- ble of Adoration. And, as human Nature cannot be conceived with- out the innate Notion of a Deity, fo that innate Notion taught Men that that Deity was to be worfhipped. This is that htdtayut . izi, honour. 14 The Obje& of Adoration. Chap* 2; honour, and power, and might, be unto our God for ever and ever* Amen, Rev. vii 12. Now thefe Perfections of God are made known to us feveral Ways : Firft, By God's Name. For altho God wants no Name, as being only ONE *, and as One only cannot be diftinguimed from others, which is the End of proper Names f; yet God was pleafed, in companion to our Infir- mities, to make ufe of fome Names and Denomi- nations, that he might thereby the better reveal himfelf to our Underftandings. And thefe Names are fuch as declare to us the Excellency of his Being, or the Greatnefs of his Power, or his Dominion over us, or his Mercy towards us, and his Love and Regard for us ,• that all and every of thefe Names, as foon, and as often as we hear them, fhould move us to glorify that tremendous Being, and to adore that God to whom we owe our very felves, and to whofe Mercy we are indebted for every Gift, and every Blefling we enjoy. Secondly, By God's Attributes. Secondly, God difcovers the Excellency of his Nature to us, by his Attributes ; which are thofe Perfections of the divine Nature whereby God is * Mercurms Trifmegtflus t cited by Laftanttus, 1. I.e. 6. eov ttvcJvV(JL@'» And that of Apollo. 'Avlotpvm, dMa/l& etfxnjup JevQiKtKlQ- Oi/j/ofAflfc, yM^i hoya yv%*\u-vw kv TVfi t/atuv Toujo 0g^. t Nee opus eft proprio vocabulo, nifi cum difcrimen cxigit multitude Latt. 1. 1. c. 6. diftin- Chap 2. The Objeff of Adoration. ij dlftingui flied from his Creatures, and whereby he- is made known to them as their God and Creator : Such are the divine Independency, Simplicity, Immutability, Eternity, and Immenfity. Thefe are fo peculiarly God's Perfections, that they are not even communicable to any created Being, how- ever excellent and glorious. And the other Attributes of Knowledge, Good- nefs, and Juftice, which God has in fome meafurc communicated to us, declare the Excellency of his Nature, that we might know him our God, that we might tafle and fee that the Lord is gracious, that we may fear his Juftice, love his Goodnefs, dread his Power, have a Senfe of his Perfections, and adore that tremendous Being. Thirdly, By the Works of Nature and Grace. Thirdly, God has declared the Excellency of his Grcacnefs, both by the Works of Nature and Gr ace. The Work of the Creation declares both his Wif- dom, Power, and Mercy ; and the daily vifible Providences magnify his Regard and Goodnefs. The Gentiles knew God by the Work of the Cre- ation ; St. Paul tells us Co, both his Power and God- head, Rom. i. 20. God being invifible, manifefted himfelf by the moft excellent Fabrick of the World; and the Senfe the Gentiles had of the Almighty Power (hewn in the Creation, led them to adore the Great Creator: Thence Pythagoras, whofe Words are preferv'd in Juflin Martyr, has this ex- cellent Observation *. ElT/f lp« 060? tt(ti, Wf«§ Ivof, ot/J©- op«A« Juftin. M. de Monarch. Dei. h I 6 TheObjefiofAdbiration. Chap, tl He that will fay I am a Power divine^ A God befides that One, let him firft make A World like this, and fay that this is mine y Before he to himfelf that Title take. And as the Works of Nature, fo the Works of Grace are greatly to be praifed; and the Love, the Mercy, and Companion of God, do as greatly declare the Infinity of his Goodnefs, as the Crea- tion does the Infinity of his Power. God is to be glorified for his Mercy ; greater Thankfgiving is due to our God for our Redemp- tion, than for our Creation, as it is an Ad: of greater Mercy to us ; for it is much better not to be at all, than to be eternally miferable. And therefore we find the Adoration and Thankfgiving for our Redemption, as well as for our Creation. Rev. v. 12. Rev. iv. ii. Worthy is the lamb that Thou art worthy ,0 Lord, was /lain, to receive power, to receive glory, and honour, and riches, and wifdom, and power ; for thou haft and ftrength, and honour , created all things, and for and glory, and bleffing. thy fie a fur e they are y and Ver. 9. For thou waft (lain, were created. and haft redeemed us to God by thy blood. God therefore is to be glorified for his own great Glory. 1 But further, God is to be worfhipped by us his Creatures for our own fakes, becaufe of the Benefit which redounds to us thereby ; for when we con- fider our continual * Dependency, when we reflect * Culms dicitur Deo debitus, nam Deo dcbetur ille cultus a cre~ atura rationali : Ratio additur, quia eft piimum rertim omnium piincipium, a quo omnia dependent j propter hanc igitur excel- lentiam debetur lilt cultus. Becani Sum, TheoU Schol. I, 8 1. p. 48 ?. on Chap. 2. The Objeff of Adoration. 17 on the many Streights and Difficulties, the conti- nual Wants and Exigences, and the many Dangers we are continually expos'd to, we have continual reafon to look up, and pray, as well for his gra- cious Aid, as we have to render him Praife and Thankfgiving for Mercies already received, and for the hope of thofe to come. For thefe Reafons God is to be adored, and many more ; but thefe I could but only name, as introductory only to the principal Defign of this Difcourfe. CHAP, 1 8 God alone the Chap. 3 . CHAP. III. God alone is the ObjeEi of our Adoration. Hat God is the Object of our Adorati- on, we have feen before, and why. It remafns now that I /hew, That God is this Object of Adoration alone, exclu- five of all other Beings whatever. Exod. 20. 3. Thoufhalt have no other Gods before me. Dent. vi. 13. 'Thou fink fear the Lord thy God 7 and ferve him, and Jhaltfwear by his name. Matth. iv. 10. Thou jhalt worjhip the Lord thy God 7 and him only pi alt thou ferve. From thefe, and abundant other Texts of Scrip- ture it is plain, that the worfhipping any other but God only, is Polytheifm or Idolatry ; for that all Beings whatfoever are excluded from having any Share in divine Worfhip : for to worfhip any Being, tho of the moft exalted Nature, that is not really and truly God, is robbing God of his Ho- nour, and giving his Glory to another. For it is evident from the whole Tenor of the Scripture, that God has not only not commanded, but abso- lutely prohibited all Creature-worfhip, and laid it down as a fundamental Rule, That God alone is to be worfhipped, becaufe he is God, in oppo- fition Chap. 3 . Objeti of Adorathn. 1 9 fition to all that do not ftand pofieiTed of thofe Excellencies which belong to God. And the Worfhip that is to be paid him, is not fupreme Worfhip only, but all Worfhip ; not our higfreft religious Service only, but our whole religious Service, without referving any Part or Degree of it for any other. And St. Paul condemns the Ga- iatiansy as guilty of Idolatry, becaufe that wfyen they knew not God, they didfervice unto them which by nature are no Gods, Gal. iv. 8. Whence it is plain, That no Being is the Object of Adoration but what is God by Nature. And that was the Reafon the Angel refufed St. Johns Worfhip, and directed him to worjhip God, Rev. xix. 10. The Arian Kypothefis, which is better than the Socinian, as it makes Chrift a diftinct Spirit, and God's Inftrument in the Creation *, is contrary to, and condemned by the firft Commandment as idolatrous ; how much more the Socman, which {lands in full opposition to the Scriptures, and the Practice of the Jewjjh and Chriftian Church, making Chrift. a mere Creature only, tho advanced to the higheft Honour, and to the Denomination of a God? The Diftinction between divine and mediatorial Worfhip is not grounded on Scripture, no one can prove that mediatorial Worfhip is diftinct from di- vine : It is a pitiful Shift which will excufe Pagan Polytheifm, and Popifh Idolatry, as well as their own Practice. And what Sclecifm is it to make Chrift a God by Exaltation, and then deny him divine Worfhip ? for whatever the Unitarians in- tend, they do by confequence make more than one God, and fo are Ditheifts ; or they give di- * The Unity of God not inconfiftent with the Divinity of Chrift, p. 7, and 26. C 2 vine 2o God alone the Chap. j. vine Honour to a Creature, and fo become Ido- laters. They do not indeed believe two fupreme Gods. They are not fpeculative Polytheifts, orDitheifts; yet they are practically fuch, by paying religious Worfhip (which is the incommunicable Honour due to the Supreme God only) to more than one God ; and if you change the Name, they become I- dolaters. Polytheifm among the Heathens was this, The Belief and Worshipping of more Gods than one, tho one was fuperior and the other inferior ; for the Pagans believed there was one fupreme Only God, and that all the other were the fubordinate Minifters of that One only fupreme God : yet both Jews and Chriftians have notwithftanding always charged them with Polytheifm. Thus Jupiter and Mercury , Acts xiv. ii, 12. tho one was fuppofed to be the fubordinate Minifter of the other, were by the Lycabnians fpoken of in the plural Number as Gods, as two Gods. And if the Belief of the one only fupreme God, and the other fubordinate, can excufe the Socimans, then the Pagans w ere not guilty of it j for the Pagans never believed that there were many fu- preme Gods, that's too filly, and too much of a Contradiction, even for blind Heathens : They believed there were many inferior Deitys, but all in fubordination to One Supreme. And this will remain a dead weight upon Socm- an? fm, which will fink it for ever, That it either makes two Gods in Pracuce, or that they become Idolaters, by giving the divine Honour to a mere Creature. This made Francifcus Davides, as I fhew'd before, defift from praying to Chrift, and put Socinus upon that mean Shift of fuperior and inferiorWor(hip y \\'hich he borrow'd from the Church of Rome, and has long fincc Chap. j. Objefi of Adoration. 21 fince been exploded, becaufe that will juflify the moft ftupid Idolatry in the World ; for fo Davides concluded, c If it be Iauful to worfhip God in * Chrift, then it is alfo lawful to worfhip him in c the Sun, Moon, and Stars :' and all Idolaters muft be excus'd, who prof'efs that they worfhip God in their Images. For if this Diftin&ion will fe- cure Men from Idolatry, I do not fee how there can be any Breach of the fir ft Commandment at all : then Baal and Ajhtarotb, and the Gods of the Nations may be worfhipped with a fubordinate Worfhip ; and Solomon might facrifice to AJhtarath and Mdcom, to Chemojh and Moloch , provided he did but ferve the God of Ifrael with the fupreme Worfhip, and acknowledge him as the fuperior God. Nay, this would excufe the Samaritans for ferving their own Gods, as long as it was done in fubordination to the fupreme God. Divine Worfhip can be but one, and Socinus * himfelf, when he could not anfwcr Davides, ac- knowledges that religious Adoration cannot be more religious and lefs religious. And when in his Anfwer to Franken, he had aflerted that reli- gious Worfhip was not God's Property, for that the Scriptures had given this Honour to Chrift altho not God, becaufe Almighty Power was gi- ven to Chrift : Franken anfwers very right, That the divine Power cannot claim divine Adoration ; for that muft be extended, and given to the divine Nature ; and that there is an indiffoluble Connexion between the divine Power and the divine Eflence, with divine Adoration ; and that it is downright Idolatry, to feparate the Adoration from the Di- vinity. For this Argument of Chriftian Franken\ againft Socinus, will hold good for ever ,• namely, * Hoombeck Apparatus, p. 34. Non pofHt una adoratio reli- giofa efTe, alia vero minime religiofa, f Frank, com. Socin. difputat. Anno 1^84* C 3 That expreffes a Plurality 0/ Per/ons in the Unity 0/ the Divinity j /or that God /pake not to the Angels is certain , becau/e they had.no hand in the Creation, neither was Man made after their Image, but only God's : And that God did not. /peak in the plural Number aficr the manner 0/ Princes, is as certain, becau/e it is evident that the Ka/iern Princes /pake in thefin- gular, Dan. iv. 4, 18, 20. v. 14. vi. 26. and God always /pake by the Prophets in the /ingular Number, Gen. xvii. i. Exod.xx. I, Numb. xiv. 55. and el/ewhere. And Zancliy ajfures us that the mofl an- cient Jews have rendered it by the div'me Per/ons : De trib. Eloh^ 1. 8. c. 3. § 1. p. 344. & Part, pofter. 1. 2. c 1. $ z. p. 31)7. In Chap. 5 . becaufe he is God. 2 7 In the Old Teftament. In theNewTefh.ment. Pfal. xlv. 6, 7. Thy Mat. xxviii. 19. Go yj Throve, God, is for ever therefore and teach all Na- and ever God, thy God, tions^ baptising than in the has anointed thee. Name of the Father, and Pfal. ex. 1. The Lord cf the Son, and of the HJy f aid unto my Lor d. ' Gh'fi. Ifa. Ixi. 1. The Spirit of ]^hn x. 30. / and my the Lord God is upon me, be- Father are One. canfe the Lord has anointed John xiv. 17. / wijf m e. pray the Father, and he Ifa. brill. 9, 10, 1 1, 14. Jhall give you another Com- The Angel of his Prefence forter even the Spirit of faved them but they Truth. vexed his Holy Spirit 2 Cor. xiiL 13. The the Spirit of the Lord can- Grace of the Lord Jyfus fed him to reft. Chrift, and the Love of God, [Numb. vi. 24, 25, 2(5- and the Felmvjhip cf the Ifa.vi. ver. 3. wither. 8. Holy Ghft he r/ith you all- Ifa. xxxiii. 22.] Amen. 1 John v. 7. For there are three that bear record in Heaven, the Father^ the Word, and the Holy Ghoft, and thefe three are one * The * Mr. Whifton, m his Reply to the Earl of Nottingham, impo- fes a mofl horrid Faljhood upon the World, in ajferting that this Ver ft never was in the Text, till about the Middle of the Reign of Queen Elizabeth, and that no Greek Copy in the World, that, was really zvritten before Printing, ever had it otherzvife than in the Margm, Page 10, 11. for Mr. Martini; proved as plain as the Sun M Noonday, that this very Ver ft is to be found in the Greek tfcripts, as well as in the Latin ; that the Greek Church re- ceives it as authentkk, and that it has been always in St. HieromV Translation, and that it was in the old Italick Vcrfion before that . Hierom : Crit. DifTert. on 1 John v. 7. Anno 17 19 4f*d Eijhop Reveridge ajjures us, that it never was fo much as queftion- ed in the Bays of Arms, on Art. i. Anno 17 1 1. p.$?« A ' li ' Spanheim proves that it was in the Text in the Cjprianick Age y frequently made ufe of by him, and that it was in the Latin Vtr- ' fecond Century, Eccl. Hift. Sec. $. pag. 707. And Bt- fion in ttje j. J ' - Jl,op 2 8 Adoration due to Chrijl Chap. 5 . The fame holy Scriptures tell us both in the Old and New Teftament, That this God is holy and jufi, that he cannot Ije nor deceive us* In the Old Teftament. In the New Teftament. Pfal. lxxxix. 35. Once Tit. i.2. God that can- have I fivorn by my HAi- not lye. nefs, that I will not lye. Heb. vi. 18. It is im- poffible for God to lye. And laftly, the fame Scriptures affure us, both in the Old and New Teftament, 'That Godwill not give his Honour to any created Being. In the Old Teflament- In the New Teftament. Ifa. xlii. 8. / am the Phil. ii. 10. That at the Lord, that is my Name, Name of Jefus every Knee and my Glory will I not give Jhould bow. to another. Jude xxv. To the only Ifa.xlviii.il. I will not wife God our Saviour, be give my Glory unto another. Glory and Majefly, Domi- nion and Power, both now and for ever. Amen. 1 John v. 21. Keep your jelves from Idols. Having therefore this Foundation of God's Ve- racity, and Concern for his own Honour, and he having Co plainly reveal'd to us that there are three fliop Bull giites us a very convincing Argument thai this Verfe was in the Text s from certain Heretichs who were called Alogi, becaufe they rejected the Logos : Which Heretichs denied the Go f pel of St. John, and this Epiflle 9 becaufe that Word ivas found in them. Now the Word Logos is not found in this llpiftle, but only in this Verfe j which proves therefore that this Verfe was in the Epiflle, for other- wife they would not have rejected it. Bifhop Bull'; Tra£ls, by Mr. Nelfon, Vol. 3. p. 847. Perfons Chap. 5 . becaafe he is God. 29 Perfons in the Unity of the divine Majefty, we hum- bly receive his Revelation with all due Regard, and mod awful Submiflion. And this we believe, altho we have not a full Perception of it. We be- lieve it on the Authority and Fidelity of the mod holy God that has re veal 'd it, altho we underdand not how that can be ; we are not defirous of fearch- ing into that Secret which Gcd has withheld from us, and referv'd for a brighter Light, and a more exalted Station : We are fatisfied it is fo, tho we know not how. Even as in refpect to the Creation, we believe the Creatures are made, tho we under- hand not how they were made : We jangle not with the Works of God, becaufe we know not how he made them ; for it is my Opinion, that if we per- fectly underftood how any of the Creatures were made, we fhould be able to make them too. Since we are therefore fatisfied about the one, why fhould we not be about the other ? For if we know not the Architecture of a Fly, nor underftand the For- mation of a Gnat, which furpafles our Underftand- ing as much as our Power to make them, how much more unable are we to comprehend the Nature of that Being, which infinitely exceeds ail Beings, the Lord and Giver of Life ? In confidence therefore of Gcd's Veracity, and in reliance on his Wifdom, Holinefsand Truth, we believe that there are three perfons in the undivided Unity of the Divinity ; and that Jefus Chrift, whom we, and all the Hods of Heaven, and all the Churches on Earth adore, is the true God : and we adore him as God, with the fame Honour and Wor- fhip, as we honour the Father, and that not rafhly, not unadvifedly, not inconfiderately, but accord- ing to, and in obedience to God's own Command, That all Men fhould honour the Son even as they honour the Father ', for he that honour eth not the Son, honoureth not the Father who has fent him, John v. 22, 23. Which Words 3 o Adoration due to Child Chap. 5. Words moft positively enjoin that the felf-fime Ho- nour muic be paid to the Son as is paid to the Fa- ther : and that whatever Pretence Men may make, that Honour is due to the Father only, that God here himfelf teftifies that he is dishonoured, if the fame Honour that is due to him be not paid to the Son ; and the Reafon and Foundation is y becaufe this Son, this Jefus Chrift, is very God, is really and truly God. And that Chrift is that very God that is to be worfhipped, appears From the Divine Name s. All the Names and Titles which belong to the glorious Ma jerry of God, are given to the Lord Chrift ; and thefe are given not once, but always ; not only without, but with the diftinguifhing Ar- ticle ; not barely, but with the moft glorious Attri- butes, in the very felf-fame manner as they are given to God the Father : He is called God abfolutely, the incommunicable Name of J EH OVA is given to him, he is called the true God, the mighty God, the great God and Saviour ; and all the fublime Ti- tles whereby the only true God is dignified and dif- tinguifhed, are given to him. Jesus Christ is God Jehova. The Jews fay that J E HO VA is God's proper Name, and fo peculiarly God's Name, that it ne- ver was nor can be communicated to any created Being *. And this is grounded upon the Scriptures, Jfa. xlii. 8. I am the Lord, Jehova, that is my Name \ and my Glory wiU I tot give to am they, neither my Praife to graven Images : And Hofea xii. 5. Even the Lord * Euxtorf. Lex. p. 157. Szegedin con£ de Trin. p. $99. God Chap. 5. becanfe he is God. 3 1 God of Ht (Is, the Lord is his Memorial : Where the Word Memorial excludes all created Beings from participating in that Name, and appropriates it to God only. Nay, God himfelf does infift upon his being Jehova only, in opposition to all other Gods, glorying, in a manner, and triumphing in it as the difiinguifhing Chara&er, by which he would be known to be infinitely fuperior to all the Gods of the Nations. Exod. xii. 12. Againfl all the Gods of Egypt I will execute Judgment, I am the Lord-, Jeho- va. And Jer. xxxii. 27. I am the Lord, Jehova, the God of all Flefi ; is there any thing too hard for ?ne ? The Jew s farther fay, that in the Letters of the Name * Jehova, the three Tenfes, pail:, prefent, and future, are contained, was, is, and fhall be ,• and that St. John from thence interprets it, Who is, who was, and is to come, Rev. i. 18. whence it is called the Name of God's Exiftence : For when God had faid, Exod. iii. 14. I AM WHAT I AM, he prefently after calls himfelf JEHOVA, wer. iy. and fays, that that is his peculiar Name ; This is my Name for ever, and this is my Memorial unto all Ge- nerations : And our Adverfaries do allow, that the Name Jehova has reference to the necefiary Exiftence of the Perfon fo named in his own Right f. And this Name J E HO VA, this peculiar Name, which the Pfalmift fays is God's Name alone, Pfal. Ixxxiii. 18. is given to the Son of God, even to Jefus Chrift. This Name is diftinguifh'd in our Tranflation by Capital Letters, tho the Word Jab, which is a Contraction of Jehova, is noted with the fame Capitals, and alfo rendered LORD ||. * Euxtorf. ibid. f Clark'* Reply, pag. 164. |j Exod. xv. 1. xvii. 16. in the Pfalras f often, I fa. xxxviii. 11. Cant. viii. 6, In 3 1 Adoration du In the Old Teftament. I fa. xlv. 21, £7*. 7~We w #o GW i Jer.xxiii. 6. InhisDays i Cor. i. 30. But of hint {hall Judah be faved, and ye are inChrifl Jefus, who Ifrael fiall dwell fafely ; of God is made unto us Wif and this is his Name -where- dom, and Righteoufnefs, ayid by he fiall be called, The Sanclification, and Redemp- Lord our Righteous- tion, NESS. Here I am to obferve, that the Lord our Righteouf- nefs is not all the Name of Chrift, but Jehova only ; and our Righteoufnefs is a Defer iption both of his di- vine Nature, and of the Mercy Mankind fhould re- ceive from him. In the Original it is *»0piy TzJd- kenu j and Buxtorf tells us, that the Word pltf rigb- teousj was a common Addition to the Titles of the Kings of Jerusalem* : And fo here Chrift is called Jehova the righteous, and particularly our Righte- oufnefs, to declare his Government, and what Man- kind fhould receive from him, who is both their King and their God. And this Text is explain'd by Jer. xxxiii. 16. where it is not faid to be his Name, but his Title, and Defcription of his Nature. I /hall only add, that the Jews fay f, the Name jehova is not only God's great and glorious Name, but that it is alfo the Name of Grace and Mercy, from Exod. xxxiv. 6. The Lord, the Lord God, merci* ful and gracious, hng-fuffering, and abundant in Good' nefs andTruth* And that this Name of Grace be- longs to the Meflias, the fame Jews acknowledge, when they fay, " Why do the Ifraelites pray, and c< are not heard ? and anfwer, Becaufe they do " not underftand (Shemhamphorafi) the Name of cc Jehova explained ,• but in the Age of the MefTias " Godfhall make it known to them, and then /hall " they be heard." * Buxtorf. Lex. p. 6 $2, f Ibid, p. 30, & 167- D And 54 Adoration due to Chrifl Chap. 5. And again, " The Scripture fays, the Name of tc the Meflias is the Lord our Righteousness, " or the Jehova our Righteoufnefs : And why ? " Becaufe he is to be God the Mediator, by " vvhofe Hand we fhall obtain Righteoufnefs of " God. God therefore calls him by the Name of " Jebova*." From what has been faid it appears, that Jefus Chrifl: the Meflias is Jehova : for fince that Title is in Scripture a principal Note of Diftin&ion, by which the true God was pleafed to manifeft himfelf, and to fet forth his own fuperior Excellency, in op- pofition to all pretended Deities ; and fince this Name is given to Chrift, and applied to Chrifl: fo frequently, it follows, and the Confequence is un- deniable, that* Chrift is that God, that only true God, that is poflefled of all thofe diftinguifhing Powers and Perfections which go along with that fublime Title. Chrift is the Firft and Laft. In the Old Teftament. In the New Teftament. Ifa. xliv. 6. I am the Rev. i. n. 1 am Alpha firft, and I am the laft, and and Omega r the firft and b fides me there is no God. the laft. I cited this Text of Ifaiah before to prove that Chrift is Jehova ; now I produce it as it exprefles the eternal Greatnefs and infinite Majefty of God, and to prove that Chrift is-'that God, becaufe this moft glorious Title is given to him : A Title which exprefles the Eternity not only of the di- vine Bemg, but his fupreme Power, Dignity, and Glory, and his Government of all Things, Ifa* xliv. 6, 7, 8. * Buxtorf. Lexic. p. 164. Maimonides Chap. 5 . becaufe he is God. 3 5 Maimonides tells us, that it is the fourth Article of the Jewijk Faith to believe, That God is the Firft and the Laft * ; but the Gofpel has made it the firft, the principal, the fundamental Article of the Chrif- tian Faith, That our Lord Jefus Chrift is the'Firft and the Laft, is the fupreme God, with the Father and the Holy Ghoft, the only one God. Jesus Christ is called God abfolutely. AEls xx. 28. We find Chrift called God abfolutely, Feed the Church of God, which he haspurchafed with his own Blood: And i Tim. ii'u 16. God is manifefl in the Flejh. In both thefe Places the Name of God is given to Chrift in the moft ftrict. and proper Senfe, in the fame manner as it is given to the Father. Jesus Christ is the True God. 1 John v. 20. We are in him that is true, even in his Son Jefus Chrift. This is the true God and eternal Life. That this was fpoke of Jefus Chrift is moft certain, from the Scope of the whole Epiftle, where- in the Apoftle purpos'd to fpeak of thrift's Divi- nity ; for there were Hereticks at that Time, name- ly Cerimhus and the Ebonites, who taught that Chrift was Man only : the Apoftle therefore, in oppofition to thefe Hereticks, aflerts this of Jefus Chrift, for no body can doubt it of the Father. He afTerts therefore that Chriftians are in God, becaufe that Jefus Chrift is God ,• and he calls God «tM0/voj>, the true, and then explains that cv *al 4» *VJ», even in his Son : and that this Son is hcra faid to be the true God and eternal Life, is evident from the PiO- noun Ovtos, this ; and all Grammar obliges us to refer that to both Predicates. * Maimon, in Sanh. c. 10. D 2 For 3 6 Adoration due to Chrtft Chap. 5. For thefe two Predicates are of great weight, the fir ft this is the true God^ and the next and eternal Life. Now it has been acknowledged even by an Adverfary, that Eternal Life is a Name of Jefus (Thrift *, and appropriated to him ,• and it is as cer- tain that the other Predicate pertains to the fame Perfon : For had it been intended of the Father, that he is the true God, and Chrift the eternal Life, the Text fhould have run oJVo*, this is the true God, and %*«Vof, that other is eternal Life ; but the Words are, This is the true God , and eternal Life : There is but one Subject to both Predicates. Some Copies read the firft Part of this Verfe, We are in him that is the true God, r amuMv ®&v : and this ftrengthens the Apoftle's Aflertion, for then the Senfe muft be this, We know that the Son of God is come, and has given us an Underftanding that we may know the true God ; and we are in him that is the true God, even in his Son Jefus Chrift : This is the true God and Eternal Life. And this Conftrudion does moft powerfully affert that there is no way of knowing the true God fo certain, as by fuch a Teacher who is God himfelf. And Chrift has both taught us the true God, and united us to the true God, himfelf being the true God. And this is agreeable to the whole Defign of St. John, which is both in his Gofpel and Epiftles to vindicate the Divinity of Chrift, againft the He- reticks of thofe Times : And therefore as he began his Gofpel, fo he ends this Epiftle, averting the di- vine Nature of Chrift ; and in both, he frequently inculcates the Neceflity of believing Chrift to be the true God. * Modejl Plea, p. 264. Vide Becman. Exercit. X. Amft. 1^43. Jesuj Chap. 5. becaufe he is God. 37 Jesus Christ is the Great God and Saviour. Tit. 11.13. Looking for that blejfed Hope, and the glo- rious appearing of the great God, and our Saviour Jefus Chrift. In this Text both the Titles of great God and Saviour are given to Chrift ,• and that they pertain to Chrift only appears, becaufe there is no mention of the Father, but Chrift only, in the following Part of the Difcourfe : And it is evident farther from the Article the only Ruler who is God, and our Lord Jefus Chrift. Jesus Christ is the Mighty God. Ifa. ix. (5. His Name fljall be called Wonderful, Conn- fellor, the Mighty God. Before I explain this Text, I mud obferve, that the LXX have every where render'd the Hebrew El and Elohim, by Oew, God. Aquila has render'd it by \%y&v> from its proper Signification, the pow- erful God; tho fome rather derive it from a Word expreflmg God's Omniprefence, according to Jer. xxiii. 23. Am I a God at hand, faith the Lord, and not a God afar off ? But whatever the Etymon be, this is the proper Name of God : and St. Jerom fays, that it is the proper Title of the only true God, becaufe he alone poflefles Almighty Power ||. And this is given to the Child Chrift Jefus, as well as to the eternal Father. To the Father. To Chrift Jefus. Jfa.x. 21. 'The Remnant Ifa. ix. 6. Unto us a (hall return, even the Rem- Child is born, a Son is gi- nant of Jacob unto the ven and his Name mighty God, the El Gib- fiall be the El Gibbor, bor. the mighty God* The LXX have taken a ftrange Liberty in ren- dring this Place ,• for inftead of tranflating it the mighty God, they have made a Comment, and * Beza in loc. f Perkins Expo/it. in loc. jj Hieron. in Efa. p. 85. Ed. Bencd. turned Chap, 5. hecaufe he is God. 3 9 turned it by t&ythK /3a?w "A^Jsao*, ?/;? Angel of the great Council, And St. Jerom * thinks the reafon was, becaufe they thought it flrange to apply the Name of God and Mighty to a Child. And fome are of opi- nion, that the latter Jews had corrupted fome Co- pies of the Seventy, and that thereupon feveral of the moft antient Chriflian Writers, who highly va- lued the Septuagint Verfion, quoted this Text, not as that has it, but as it is in the Hebrew Text f. And as this Name of El is given to Chrift. in the fingular, fo it is alfo in the plural Number. jefus Chrift is Jehova Elohim, the Lord God, and El Elohim, the God of Gods, This Word is ufed in the plural, both to denote the Trinity of Perfons in the Unity of the divine Eflence, as alfo to flgnify the exceeding Greatnefs of God's Power ; and tho it be given fometimes a- nalogically to Angels and Princes j|, it is notwith- flanding the proper Name of God. This Name is conftrued with a Verb of the fin- gular Number, and 'has the Name of Jehova added to it, to denote the Trinity of Perfons in the Unity of the Divinity **. And this Name is given to Chrift, Pfal. xlviii. 8, 9, 10. As we have heard, fo have we feen in the City of the Lord of HjJIs, in the City of our God y God will eft a- blijh it for ever ; ive have thought of thy loving-kin dnefs, God, in the midfl of thy Temple : according to thy Name, God, fo is thy Praife. Here the Name of * Hieron. in Efa. p. 86. f Dr. Waterland, Serm.6. p. 219. |1 Pfal. xcvii. 5, Gen. vi. 13. Exod. iv. 5. ** Hoornbeck. confut. Socin. J. z. c. 5. p. 42O. Nomen ergo Elohim velut expofitio quaedam prions nominis eft, ut videlicet fciamus ilium verum Deum, qui Jehova appel- lator, effe Patrem, Filium, 8c Spiritum Sanftum. Szegedin. conf. d? Tr'in. p. 601. D 4 Elohim 4© Adoration due to Chrift Chap, j, Elohim is four times together given to Chrift, and twice in the 1 aft Vet (q^ This God is cur God for ever and ever, he will be our Guide unto Death* And fo again by Hofea y ch>i. 7. / will have Mercy upon the ffoufe of Judah, and will fave them by the Lord their God ; by the Jehova their Elohim : and the Jews themfelves acknowledge this Text to relate to the Mefiias, and accordingly the Chaldee Paraphrafe reads it by his Word which is their God. And in the New Teftament we find the fame Title of Lord God given to Chrift : for Luke i. 16, 17. we find the Angel fpeaking of John the Baptift, Manyfiall he turn to the Lord their God, and he Jhall go before him, namely before Chrift, who is that Lord God ; for in ftrictnefs of Conftru&ion the Words Lord their God are fo immediately con- nected to btm 9 that they cannot poflibly be under- stood of any Perfon but Chrift : and if this be com- pared with Luke iii.4. and Malachi iii. 1. it is im- portable that any Perfon can be underftood but Chrift, w ho is the ^ord. And as Chrift is called Jehova Elohim, the Lord God y fo he is alfo called El Elohim, the God of Gods, Pfal. I. 1. as our old Tranflation has it : which Pfalm has ever been look'd upon as relating to Chrift, and his coming to Judgment, and as fuch it muft necef- farily pertain to Chrift; For the Father judgeth no Man, but has committed all Judgment unto the Son, John v. 22. And fo the Pfalmift fpeaks to Chrift, Arife, God, and judge the Earth, Pfal. lxxxii. 8. Upon which Text the Jews have this Comment, c< When the Judgment goeth forth in Mercy and ly exceeding the Limits of the Creatures * And fo the third Article of the Jewijh Faith, ex- prefles God's Ubiquity : I perie&ly believe, that the Creator is not a Body, neither can he be compre- hended by any bodily Comprehensions, neither is there any thing like unto him t- This is afcribed to God the Father, and alfo in the felf-fame manner to God the Son. To the Father. To the Son. Jer. xxiii. 23, 24. Am Mat. xviii. 20. Where I a God at hand, faith the two or three are gathered to- Lord, and not a God afar get her in my Name, there off ? Can any hide himfelf am I in the midfl of them, in ferret Places, that I ]l all Mat. xxviii. 20. Lo I not fee him, faith the Lord? am -with you always, even Do not I fill Heaven and unto the End of the World. Earth, faith the Lord ? Col. i. 17. By him all Ads xviu 28. In him "things confifi. we live, and move, and Heb. i. 3. Upholding aU have our Being. 'Things. * Immenfitas eft perfeftio Dei, per quam nulla menfuri re? ium creatarum, vei creabilium, ipfe cominetur : omnibus crc- aturis prsfcns, earumq; limfres exceden*. Markb ibid. § 17. f Maimonid. in Sanhedr. c. 10. Jtfys 4 8 Adoration due to Chrtfi Chap. 5 * jefus Chrift is Immutable. Immutability, which is that moft perfect Con- ftancy of God *, whereby he is perfectly free from all Change actual or poflible : This is God's Prero- gative, and is afcribed to the Son, in the fame Pomp and Magnificence, as it is to the Father. To the Father. To the Son. Pfal. cii. 2j, 26, 27. St. Paul, Hebi* 10, il s Thou, Lord, in the Begin- 12. oppofing the Imrnu- ning haft laid the Founda- tability of Chrift to the Hon of the Earth, and the fading and perifhing Na- Heavens are the Works of ture of the Heavens and thine Hands : "they jhall ' pe- Earth, afcribes the Glo- riJh,butthourema.ine{i^and ry of that Perfection to they all Jhall wax old as doth Chrift in the very Words a Garment, and as a Vef- of David, Pfal. cii. ture jh alt thou fold them up^ Heb.xiii.8. Jefus Cbrift, and they Jhall be changed ; the fame yeflerday, to day* but thou art the fame, and and for ever. thy Tears fi all not fail* Mai. iii.5. I am the Lord, I change not, James i. 17. The Father of Lights, with whom is no Variablenefs, neither Shadow of turning. Before I proceed, let me make a Remark on thofe admirable Words of David y Pfal. cii. applied by St. Paul to Chrift Jefus. No Words can be devifed more emphatical to defcribe the Etjp rnity and Im- mutability of the one only true and eternal God; and fince they are here afcribed, and that by an Apoftle, without any Referve, without the leaft Reftri&ion, to Jefus Chrift, we are obliged to be- * Immutabilitas eft perfe£Hflima ilia Dei conftantia, qua ora- nis plane mutationis expers eft turn a&ualis turn poillbilis. Mar- k'ti ibid. § z6. lieve Chap, j. hecaufe he is God. 45? lie've that this Jefus Chrifi is the eternal and immu- table God. When David firft exprefled thefe Words, he fpake of the Jehova, the God of 1/rael; when the Apoftle applies them, it is to Chrift. The great Actions there mentioned, are the Actions of Chrift, as the expanding of the Heavens, and laying the Foundations of the Earth. Thofe great Attributes of the divine Nature there' related, Immutability and Eternity, are the Perfeftions of Jefus Chrift ; Chrift therefore is that Jehova, that God of Ifrael, the one only God, as well as the Father. And it is very obfervable, that this Text is Co penn'd by the facred Writer, that all Occafions of Criticifm, by Prepofitions or Articles, are prevented : whatever doubt there may be by them, or becaufe of them, in other Texts, there can be none in this ; Chrift is the eternal God, Chrift is God immu- table, Jefus Chrift is the Independent God* Independency, which is that Perfection of God, whereby he is fufficient to himfelf, and the only Caufe of all Things *, is a divine Perfection, and that Perfection which declares the All-fufficiency, and Beatitude of the divine Nature. This is afcri- bed to the Son equally as to the Father. To the Father. To the Son, Gen. xvii. i. I am the John v. 26. For ay the 'Almighty God ; or, as the Father hath Life in himfelf, old Tranflation has it,ac- fo hath he given to the Son cording to the Hebrew^ I to have Life in himfelf am the All-fujficient. * Independent eft perfe&io Dei, qua fibi fuftkiens, omnium extra fe caufa eft fumma. Markii ibid. § 20. E This 5 o Adoration due to Chrtji Chap. jr. This Text of Sr. John is very veil worthy of our Confederation, as it does moft admirably atfert Chrift's Divinity, and explain his Independency : For this Text clearly intimates, that akho he had his divine Life and Nature from the Father, as the Fountain of the Deity, yet he received it not by Participation, but by Communication ; he did not only participate of it, but it was wholly communi- cated to him. Hence it is that the Chriftian Fa- thers have called Chrift *, 'Ai/tc]^«o^ dLv-nHvAuM, c£v- 7iQios, dvTi Uvja, not of him- feif, but in himfelf : and that tho he be ®tU U 05«*, God of God, yet he is GiU h ku7<», God in himfelf, and that is fufficient to denominate him dvTofeos, Self- God ,• for dvjokoi is the fame with dv\U o Qw, one who is God in himfelf, and fo is God himfelf ,• not another God, but another Perfon from the Father, having the fame Eflence communicated to him. Chrift is the Omnifcient God: Omnifcience is that Perfection of God, whereby he moft perfectly knoweth all Things in himfelf, by one eternal Act ||. This is moft certainly a divine Perfection, and the divine Privilege ; and is in the Scriptures afcribed to the Son equally as to the Father. * Greg. NyfTen. in Catech. major. Bafil. 1. 2. contra Euno mium, pag. 740. torn. 1. Ed. Par. 16 $8. f Epiph. Hasr. 77. p. 245. Edit. Colon. 1617. || Scientia eft perfe&io Dei, per quam uno a&U Kterno, in fe perfeftiflime omnia cognofcit. Mark. § 34. * To Chap. 5 . becatife he is God. 5 1 To the Father. To the Son. 1 Kings viii. £p. Thou John xvi. 30. Now we even thou only Jmoweft the are fure that thou knoweft Hearts of all the Children of all Things* Men. John xxi. 17. Lord, thou Ads xv. 8. God which knoweft all Things, knoweth the Hearts. . Rev. ii. 23. I am he that Jer. xvii. 10. I the Lord fearcheth the Reins and the fearch the Hearts y I try the Heart. Reins. Ads i. 34. Thou Lord which know eft the Hearts of all Men* Col. ii. 3. In whom are hid all the Treafures of Wif- dom and Knowledge* Jefus Chrift is the Almighty God* . That Omnipotence is a divine Attribute all Men do allow ; and that it is the Perfedion of the Son as well as of the Father, the Scriptures aiuire us, which afcribe it to the Father and to the Son, in the fame Wor^s, and the fame Strength of Exoreflion. Before I fhew you that it is applied to the Son, I muft obferve, that the Word Almighty, n*vlox,&la§ 9 anfwers to the Hebrew nt^, the All- f efficient ^ Gen* xvii. 1. where our old Trantlation has All faffiricnt ; and alfo that it anfwers to another Phrafe ufed in Scripture to exprefs Almiehty Power, and that is the Lord of Hfts, Jehova Sabaoth, .rTNM |—fliT And St. Ambrofe * and Jerom ] have obferved, Tnat the LXX have rendered J>hova Sabaoth indifferent- ly by Lord of Hfts and Almighty. And St. John, * Sabaoth autem interpretes alicubi Dominum virtutum, alf- cubi regem, alicubi omnipotentem, inte'-pvetnri funt. Anhroj. dt fide, I.4. c. 1. p. $14. Edit. Par. Anno 1569. | Sciendum,]-, quia ubicumq; frptuaginta interpvetes Dominum virtutum, & Dominum omnipotentem exprefTerint, in Haebiaeo lit pofltum Dominus Sabaoth. Hkron. torn. 3. p. 5*9- E 2 Rev, 5 i Adoration due to Chfijl Chap. y. Rev. iv. 8. alluding to the thrice holy of Ifaiah, in- ftead of Ky^oj Jbvctys.uv, as the Septuagint has it, or Sabaoth as the Hebrew, which is Lord of Hofts, has Ky'e/o? o ©go* o TmvloKg/.Tat, Lord God Almighty. That this Attribute is the Property of the Father needs no Proof ; but that it is. applied only to the Father, is not true, for it is applied to the Son both in the Old and New Teftament. In the Old Teftament. In the New Teftament. Ifa. vi. 5. Wo is me — John xii. 41. Thefe for mine Eyes have feen the Things /aid Efaias, when King, the Lord of Hofls* he faw (ChriftJ his Glo- Zech. xii. 5. The Inha- ry, and fpake of him. bit ants of JerufalemyW/fo John xix. 34. But one of my Strength in the Lord of the Soldiers with a Spear H-fls their God. pierced his Side. And wy. 10. I will pour Ver. 37. And again a- upon the Honfe of David, nother Scripture faith, they and upon the Inhabitants of JhaU look on him whom they Jerufalem, the Spirit of pierced. Grace and oj Supplications, Rev. i. 7, 8. Behold he and they fiall look upon me comet h zvith Clouds, and whom they have pierced. every Eye Jh all fee him, and they alfo which pierced him* And all Kindreds of the Earth Jh all wail becaufe of him* Even fo, Amen. I am Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the Ending, faith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty. 'Thirdly, That Chrift is the very God that is to be worshipped, appears from The Divine Operations* All the Works of God are afcribed to Chrift in the fame manner as they are to the Father, John v. 19. '\, verily, I fay unto you, the Son can do nothing of himfelf Chap. 5. becaufe he is God. o himfelf but whatever he feeth the Father do ; for what Things foever he doth, thefe alfo doth the Son likewife. This very Text the Adverfaries of the Divinity of Chrift make ufe of againft Chrift, as an Argument againft his Almighty Power ; but then I mud ob- ferve to you that they divide the Text, and take only the firft Part, being well aflured, fliould they take it as it lies, it is moft pofitively againft them : For the full Meaning of the Text is, that God the Son is intimately united with the Father, never fe- parate from him, and therefore never ads but in concert with him ; for that the Operation is undi- vided, and the Work one. And then it appears^ that this Text is fo far from denoting any Imper- fection in the Power of the Son, that, on the con- trary, it fets forth the Greatnefs and unmeafurabie Perfedion of it, as being infeparably linked with, and indeed one and the fame, in extent and degree, with the Father's. Jefus Chrift is the Creator of the World, That the creating of the World is an Ad of God, of Almighty Power, is a Truth known to all Man- kind, and acknowledged by the very Light of Na- ture. See Page 1 j. And this is afcribed to Jefus Chrift in the Scriptures exactly as it is to the eternal Father. ; To the Father. To the Son. Gen. i. 1. In the Begin' John i. 3. All Things ning God created the Hea- were made by him (Chrift uen and the Earth. the Word) and without Exod. X3£. 11. In fix him warnot any Thing made Days the Lotd made Hea' that was made. *ven and Earth, the Sea 7 Ver. 10. He was in the and all that in them is. World, and the World was made by him. 2 Kings E 3 Col, 54 Adoration due to Chrijl Chap. 5. 2 Kings xix. 15. Thou Col.i. 15,16, 17. /^a art the God, even thou alone, is the Image of' the iwo'ifibh of all the Kingdoms of the God, the firft-born of every Earthy thou haft made Hea- Creature ; for by him were ven and Earth, all 'Things created that are Heb. iii. 4. He that in Heaven, and that are in built all Things is God. Earth, vifible and invi/ible, •whether they be Thrones, or Do?ninions, or Principalities, or Powers : All Things were created by him and for him , and he is before all Things, and by him all Things confift. Before I proceed I muft obferve, that feveral of the Ancients, namely, Origen, BafiU and Ambrofe, have rendered Gen. i. 1. PVttWY the Beginning, by the Son ; and that the Chaldee Paraph rail, for in principio y in the Beginning, has in fapientia, in or by his VVif- dom ; and that this Wifdom is the Logos, the Son of God. And this agrees excellently well with that of Solomon, Prov. viii. 2.2. The Lord peffeffed me .1 j")H rVt^NH Principiumvixfua, the Beginning of his Way ; that is, of his Works, as Vatablus expounds it. And the Text makes it good, for the fame Verfe has, / was before his Works of old ; where the Word Olp adverbially fignifies before, as we have ren- dered it, but fubftamively fignifies Oriens, the Sun- rij: of his Works of old : And there is no neceftity of making Rafh.th an Adverb neither, they are both Subftantives. ^Wherefore rrtJWl is the effential Wifdom of God, not a Property but a Sabftance ; for true Wif- dom if Sub'' nee, according to Plotims, H ethnfr.'b cvqU iaicL, )t) Yt dhnStvYi trine avv^ the firft- born Word of God, and *§yw, the Beginning*. And I mud obferve farther, That our Transla- tion, which has rendered *Er$oloiowma*s x!liffws> by the firft-born of every Creature, does not come up to the Force of the Greek ; for the Original fignifies Firft-born before all .the Creation. And St. Paul him- felt fhows it muft be fo underftood, becaufe ver. 17. he fays he is before all Things, which pofitively ex- empts him from being one of the Creatures, becaufe all Things were made by him. And therefore our Ver- sion ought to be corrected, with fubmiffion, in this Place, as it is not agreeing with the Text, and as it may give a Handle to our Adverfaries to believe Chrift a created Being, tho the firft of the Creation; when St. Paul intended to fignify the very contrary, that Chrift is no Creature : So far from that, that he exifted before all Things, and that the very Creatures both in Heaven and Earth were even made and created by him. Eph. iii. o. God -who created all Things by Jefus Chrift. Heb« i. 2. Bv whom alfo he made the Worlds. 1 Cor. viii. 6. To us there is hut one God, the Father, of whom are all Things, and we in him; and one Lord Jefus Chrift, by whom are all Things, and we by him. In this laft Text St. iWoppofes both Father and Son to the Gods many, and Lords many. There is but one Lord to us, namely Jefus Chrift ; Is then the Father excluded, who alfo is the Lord, by whom are all Things, Rom. xi. 34,36. among the Lords many ? God forbid, but Father and Son are one Lord. So again, to us there is but one God, namely the Fa- ther ; Is then the Son excluded amon? the Gods many ? that Son who is over all, God blejfed for ever> * See Dr. H. More, Defence of Cabala, p. 73, 74- E 4 Rom. 5 6 Adoration due to Chrijl Chap: y. Rom. ix. 5. God forbid, but Father and Son are one God. For St. Paul in this Place not only tells us that the Father and Son are one God, and one Lord, but alfo intimates the Reafon why, and on what Account they are one, becaufe all Things flow from both. There is nothing of the Father but by the Son ; nor any thing by the Son but what is alfo of the Father : So that the Original of all Creatures is referr'd to both, as to one individual Fountain, and Caufe of their Exiftence. I mu ft further obferve, That the Expreflions IvolvIq, in him, and cT/ *V7«, by him , and hsavJqv, for him, are ufed both in refpect. to the Father as to the Son; and aifo «$ «V]oy -m cr*V7«. and S 1 } *i/J« t* qtdti\& % are equally applied to the Father and to the Son, all 'Things are for him, and all Things are by him. Which Expreftion being equally applied to Father and Sen, did not drop by chance from the Pen of infpired Writers, but have a certain and full Meaning, to fig- nify that thefe two Perfons are the fame God and Creator : and by confequence takes off effectually any Pretence the Avians can have, merely from the Force of the Prepositions, as if they were intended for a Note of Inferiority, when they are nothing more than a Note of Diftindion, that the Opera- tion of one is of equal Extent with the Operation of the other, and indeed is but one Work of both. Before I leave this Head, I /hall only mention * that the Work of Creation is every where represent- ed as the certain Mark or Characteriftick of the true God. It is the favourite Topick which God is pleafed to infift moft upon, whenever he would either diflinguifh his own peculiar Majefty and Power above and beyond all the Gods of the Na- tions; or when he would excite in his People the higheft Idea poffible, fuitable to his tranfeendent Excellency, and peerlefs Perfections. * Dr. Waterland on the Divinity of Chrijl, Sermon nl.p. 93. For Chap. 5. lecaufe he is God. 57 For inftance, Ifa. xl. 26. Lift up your Eyes on high y and behold who hath created thefe Tubings, that bringeth out their Hofl by Number. And Job xii. 7, 8, 9. But ask now the Beafts and they Jhall teach thee, and the Fowls of the Air, and they Jhall tell thee ; or [peak to the Earth, and it Jhall teach thee, and the Ftjhes of the Sea jhall declare unto thee, Who knoweth not in all thefe, that the Hand of the Lord has wrought this ? Creation is the diftinguifhing Chara&er of the one true God ; and whenever the Scripture intended to raife in Mens Minds fuch Efteem and Veneration as they ought to have for the fupreme God, nothing higher nor greater could be faid than this, that he is the Creator, that he created the Univerfe, that he had laid the Foundations of the Earth, and that the Heavens are the Works of his Hands. And therefore Socinus^ to evade the Force of that Argu- ment, and of the Confequence St. Paul draws from thence for divine Worship, Rom.i- 2>. fell into this mad Notion, that God is not to be known from the Creation * ; and him Oftorodus f, and others, fol- lowed. But if fome are fo blind that they cannot fee, and others fo prejudiced that they will not fee, theie are but few ; and thefe perhaps rather exprefs their Wifhes than their Sentiments, and are no Argument againft univerfal Confent ,• unlefs we mud conclude that Nature is not regular in its Courfe, becaufe it produces fome Monfters and Prodigies. No ! thefe few are rather to be deem'd delirious, than that all the World fhould be Fools. * Negamus Deum aliquo modo ex operibus agnofci pofle. Socin. pr&lett. Ci 2. f Ofiorod. inftit. p. 1 e? io. Quod homines de Deo aliquid fciunt, id non habent ex natura, neq ; ex confideratione creationis, fed ex auditu, quoniam. ab initio Deus fe hominibus manifeftavit. Jefus 5 8 Adoratton due to Chriji Chap. 5, JefusChrift is the Preferver of the World. Altho Prefervation be always included in Crea- tion, as it is a continual Creation ; yet the Scrip- tures having often exprefly named it, and laid a very great Strefs upon it, I thought bed to mention it by it felf. This is a Divine Act, which none but Infinite Power can perform; for there is no lefs Power and Wifdom, and Goodnefs in the Prefervation of the Creatures, than in their firft Creation; and God is as greatly to be prais'd for our Well-being, as for our Being. The Scholafticks have happily call'd this Manutenentia, a continual holding his Hand to his Work; for fhould God withdraw his Aid, how foon would all things perifh > And this Act of Divine Power and Mercy, as it is afcrib'd to God the Father, fo it is alio with great Force and Emphafis to God the Son in the holy Scriptures. To the Father. To the Son. Neh.ix. 6. Thou, even John v. 17. My Father thou art Lord alone, thou worketh hitherto, and I haft made Heaven, the Hea- work, ven of Heaven , with all Col. i. 17. By him all their Hoft^ the Earth and things confift- all things that are therein^ Heb. i. 5. Upholding all the Seas and all that is things by the Word of his therein ; and thou pre ferveft Power. them all. Pfal. xxxv i. 6. O Lord, thou freferveft Man and Beafi. Pfal. cxlv. 15. The Eyes of all wait upon thee, and thou give ft them their Meat in due feafon. Chrift Chap. 5 . becaufe he is God. 5 $> Chrifl: is the Worker of Miracles. The working of Miracles has by all Men been efleem'd die peculiar Prerogative of God, becaufe none but he has the Springs of Nature in his Handst- and he onlv can bend them to fuch Ends, as his Will and VVifdom (hall direct them : for Miracles are fuch Ads which are above, and contrary to the Cou.fe of Nature ; and as the holy Scriptures a- fcribe them to God, and God only, fo they alfo afcribe them to JefusXhrift, the Son of God, as a Demonnration of his almighty Power, and his di- vine Nature, that he with the Father is that One only Gcd. TotheFarher. To the Son. Efel. lxxii. 1 3. Bkfjed Luke vi. 19. There went be the LordG .1, the God Virtue out of him, and heal- of Ifrael, who ohly doth ed them all. wondrous things. Matth. xi. 5. Go and Pfal. Ixxxvi. 10. For Jhew]o\m< the blind re- thou art g eat, and doft ceive their fight, and the wondrous things, thou art lame walk; the lepers are God alone. cleanfed, and the deaj hear ; Pfal. exxxvv 4. O give the dead are raifedup, and thank to him who a- the poor have the Gofpel lone d.th great Wonders. iGr.xii.6. And there are diver/hie* cf Operations, kit it is the fame God which worketh ail in all* preached unto them. And Chrift not only wrought Miracles him- felf, but as a further De- monftration of his Divi- nity, he empower'd his Apoflles to do the fame. Luke x. 19. Behold, I give unto you Power to tread on Serpents and Scorpions, and over all the Power of the Enemy. Ads 6o Adoration due to Chrifi Chap. jr. A&siv. 10. Be it known unto you all, and to all the People of Ifrael, that by the Name of "Jefus Chrifi of Nazareth, whom ye crucified , whom God raifed from the dead, even by him doth this Man ft and here before you whole, Chrift is the God of all Mercy and Grace, the Redeemer. The Word Grace not only fignifies Pity and Companion, but Aid and Afliftance, which we re- ceive from God, and whereby we are enabled to do thofe things that pleafe God. And it alfo fig- nifies the whole Work of Redemption, which God was pleas'd to effecl: by Jefus Chrift, and all the Bleflings and Favours which flow from that Re- demption. Redemption is the highefl Act of God's Wifdom, Power and Mercy, an Act far exceeding the Work of Creation ; in the Creation there was nothing to withftand almighty Power, God fpake and it was done, Pfal. xxxii* 9. He commanded, and they were created, Pfal.cxlviii. 5. but in the Redemption, God's Juflice was to be fatisfied, and his Law, which was violated by Man's Tranfgreflion, was firft to be fulfilled, and Atonement made for Tranf- greflors, before Mankind could be receiv'd into fa- vour, and God become gracious unto them. For God is a Law to himfelf, his Attributes are a Rule and Meafure to his Works ; God fet forth Chrifi Jefus therefore, for a Demonflration of his Righteoufnefs again ft Sin \ and God made him to be Sin for us who knew no Sin, that we might be made the Righteoufnefs of God in him. And as this is the highefl Demonflration of God's Love, that he gave his Son for our Redemption, Joh. Hi. 16. Co the whole Ad of Redemption by Chrift, is the Demonftration of the fublimeft Wifdom, and the Chap. 5. hecaufe he is God. 6 1 the greateft Power ; whence Chrift is call'd both the Wifdom and Power of God* And as it was only God's Power that could re- deem Mankind, fo the Scriptures, the Revelation of that Redemption, afcribe it to God only, but both to the Father and to the Son, including the Holy Ghoft, who are that one God who has re- deemed us. To the Father. Ifa.lxiii. 1 6. Thou, Lord, art our Father, our Redeemer. Eph. ii. 4. God who is rich in Mercy, for his great Love wherewith he loved us y even when we were dead in Sinsy has quickned us together with Chrift — - 8 For by Grace are ye Jawed. Hof.i. 7. I will have Mercy upon the Houfe of Judah, and will fave them by the Lord their God ■ Luke i. 68. Bleffed be the Lord God o/Ifrael, for he has vijited and redeemed his People* To the Son. Ifa.xxv. 9. And it JhaU be faid in that Day, Lo, this is our God, we have waited for him, and he will fave us ; this is the Lord, we have waited for him, we will be glad and rejoice in his Salvation* Ads xx. 28. Feed the Church of God, which he has purchased with his own Blood. 1 Cor. i. 30. But of him are ye in Chrift Jefus, who oj God is made unto us Wifdom, and Righteoufnefs , and Sanflification, and Re- demption. Johni. 16. And of his Fulnefs have all we receivd, and Grace for Grace. Chrift is the God that forgives Sins. Sin is the Tranfgreffion of the Law, 1 John iii. 4. and the Law is God's Image, his Will ; and therefore all Sin is againft God, and it is God's Property and Privilege alone to forgive Sins : and fo the holy 3 Scriptures 6 z Adoration due to Chrtfi Chap. J. Scriptures afcribe it only to God, as an Act of God, and of God only ; and this they afcribe both to Father and Son, and alfo to the Holy Ghoft, who are that one and only God. To the Father. Fxod. xxxiv. 7. The Lord, the Lord God merci- ful and gracious, long-fuf- fering and abundant in good- nefs and truth, keeping mer- cy for thoufands, • forgiving Iniquity, and Tranfgref- fion, and Sin. Ifa. xliii. 25. /, even I) am he that blotteth out thy Tranfgrejfions for mine own fake, and will not remem- ber thy Sins. Jer. xxxi. 34. / will for- give their Iniquity^ and I will remember their Sin no more. Luke v. 21. Who can forgive Sins but God alone ? Chrift is God that regenerates and fanftifies. Regeneration and San&ification are as much out of Man's Power, as his Creation ; Men fpiritually dead in Sin, can no more raife themfelves to a new Life, than a Man naturally dead can raife himfelf to natural Life. Regeneration is the Gift of God, and of God only; and the holy Scripture afcribes it to God only, as his own Act and Deed, and his only : and fo it is afcrib'd to God the Father, and in the fame manner to God the Son, who, with the To the Son. Matth. ix. 2. Son be of good cheer, thy Sins be for- given thee. Ver. <5. But that ye may know that the Son of Man hath power on Earth to forgive Sins, then faith he to the Jick of the Palfey, Anfe, take up thy Bed, and go unto thine Hntfe. Matth. xxvi. 28. For this is my Blood of the New Teftament, wh'ch is Jhedfor the forgivenef of Sins. Col. i. 14. In whom we have redemption through his Blood, even the Forgive* nefs of Sins. Chap. 5. hecaufe he is God. 6$ the Holy Ghoft, is that one God who is the Lord and Giver of Life. To the Father. To the Son. 1 Theff. v. 23. And the John xvii- 19. And for very Gi>d of Peace fanElify their fakes IfanEiify my f elf you wholly . ■ th.it they alfo might be fane- tified through the Truth* 1 Cor. vi. 1 1. Ye are fanElified, ye are juflified in the name of the Lord jfefis, and by the Spirit of our God. Heb ii. n. For both he that fancli 'flet h, and they that are fancli fie d y are all of one ; fir which caufe he is not ajham d to call them Brethren. Chrift is God the SanBifier. And therefore St. Paul calls Chrift the Lord from Heaven* and the quickning Spirit, when he oppofes hirii to the rirft Adam, 1 Cor. xv. 22. For as in Adam all die^ even fo in Chrifl fiall all be made alive : How fo ? be-aufe Cnrift is the Lord from Heaven^ ver. 47. and ver. 4?. he is the quickning Spirit ; where the Ex- preiTion We/os ej icevvy and where Tnv^A ([aonotvr fignify his divine Nature, and can fignify nothing elfe. For that Lord from Heaven fignifies God, is be- yond dif.uite, and appears evidently from John iii. 31. He that cmeth from above, is above all He that comet h from Heaven is above all : and the Jews us'd to call God, the Adam above who is biffed; and the Cabal ids fay, that this Adam above was married to the Congregation cf Ifrael, whereot the Marriage be- tween Adam and Eve w as a Reprefentaticn, which St. Paul applies to Chrifl and his Churchy Eph. v. 32 *. * Bijhop Bull, Jud. Eccl. Cath. C. 5. $. 5. An 64 Adoration due to Chrift Chap. 5 1 And the other Phrafe alfo fignifies the Divinity of Chrift ; for in this Verfe Adam, who was only a Man, is fully diftinguifh'd from the laft Adam, who was more than a Man, who was God alfo : the fir ft Man Adam was made a living Soul, the laft Adam was made a quickning Spirit* And both the Scrip- tures and the antient Jews, by Spirit, underftand the divine Nature of the Meffias; for fo they in- terpret Gen.i. 2. the Spirit of God, for the Spirit of King Meflias *. Chrift is God, the Judge of the World. That God is Judge of the whole World, is a Truth we have receiv'd from God, not by Revelation only ; but God has imprinted it in the Law of Na- ture, and wrote it in the Hearts of all Man- kind f. And that God only is Judge, is as certain ; and the Scriptures have afcrib'd the Judgment to God, both to the Father and to the Son as God, as that one God. And becaufe the Judgment is to be executed in a vifible manner, the Scripture tells us, that God has appointed Jefus Chrift the Son of God, and the Son of Man, God and Man, to hold that Judg- ment vifibly : For the Father judgeth no Man, but has committed adjudgment to the Son, John v. 22. To the Father. To the Son. Eccl. xii. 16. God flail John v. 27. And hath bring every Work into Judg- given him Authority to ele- ment, cute Judgment alfo, becaufe * Hor. Heb. Lightf. in 1 Cor. xv. 45. ■f- Riddems, the Faith and Morality of the Gentiles, Amfterd. 1*70. pag. 54. Eccl. Chap. 5. becaafe he is God. 65 Eccl. xi. 9. God Jhall he is the Son of Man. bring thee into Judgment. Ads xvii. 3 1. Because Gen. xviii. 25. »$]&/?# he has appointed a Day, in not the Judge of all the which he will judge the Earth do right. World in Righteoufnefs , by that Man whom h£ has or- dain d, whereof he has given ajfurance unto all Men, in that he hath raifed him from the dead. 2 Cor. v. 10. For we mufl aU appear before the Judg- ment-Seat of Chrift, that every one may receive the things done in his Body, according to that he has done, whether it be good or bad. Now if we examine the Texts of the Old Tefta- ment, and compare them with thofe of the New, we fhall find the Natures of the Judge mod exactly defcrib'd. Pfal 1. 1. The Judge is call'd El Elohim, Jehwa, the God of Gods, the Lord, or as our Veriion reads it, the mighty God, even the Lord ; or as the other Tranflaticn, the Lord, even the mod mighty God. And Pfal. xcvi. 13. and Pfal. xcviii. 9. we find that it is Jehova, the Lord, that cometh to judge the Earthy and that he Jhall judge the World with Righ- teoufnefs. Now from the New Teftament we learn, that the Father judgeth no Man, but has committed all Judg- ment to the Son, John v. 22. and that Chrift: is the Judge ; then it neceflarily follows, that that Chrift the Judge, is both Gcd and Man ; that that Chrift the Judge is that Jehova, that God of Gods, that mighty God that cometh to judge the Earth. Jefus 66 Adoration due to Chriji Chap. 5, Jefus Chrift the fupreme God. Having thus far feen that all the high Titles, all the divine Attributes, and all the divine Works which are afcrib'd to God the Father, are afcrib'd to Chrift the Son of God alfo ; we muft conclude, that this Chrift is the very God, the one fupreme God with the Father, whofe Glory is equal, whofe Majefty is coeternal. Every Title, every Attribute, every Work pro- claims Chrift to be God ; and all together make (o clear, fo full, fo irrefragable a Demonftration of his Divinity, that one may juftly wonder how any, who retain the lead regard to the Scriptures, can make any doubt of it. For if thefe Names, Attributes and Operations, are God's Prerogative, and God is by them made known to us, and God is by them diftinguifhed from us ,- and we have no other Criteria to know the divine Nature by than thefe ; we mud conclude, that wherever thefe are found, there we find God ; and where thefe are not found, God is not there. And therefore, if thefe Attributes declare God, we muft declare Jefus' Chrift to be God; forafmuch as they are all found in him, and afcrib'd to him : And if thefe Criteria are not conclusive in regard to Chrift, not with (landing they are found in him, then neither can they be conclusive in any other Perfon, no, not for the Father,- for we have no other Criteria given unto us, whereby to know the only true God, than thefe ; and i( thefe be not fuf- ficient to the one, they cannot be to the other ; and if they are conclufive to one, they muft be alfo to the other. To Chap. 5. hecaufe he is God. &7 To pretend that they are given to the Father iri a more eminent manner * than to the Son, is falfe and frivolous. Whereby have they difcoverM that Diftindion ? and where is it found ? they are given exadly alike, and in the mod folemn and auguft manner to the Son, as they are to the Father j and our Adverfaries will be eternally at a lofs to dis- cover a Difference: for inftance, John I 1. where the Word is call'd God, in the fame Verfe where the Father is mention'd as God *, would not any Man believe that it was to be underftood in the fame ftrift and proper Senfe to the one as to the other ? How (hall any the mod judicious Reader be ever able to underftand Language, if in the fame Verfe and fame Sentence, the fame Word fhould ftand for two Ideas, or bear two Senfes widely dif- ferent from each other ? What fliould move any one there to underftand one the true God, and the other an inferior God, which is a Contradiction in Terms ? when all the Circumftances of the Context give us no fufpicion of any fuch different Meaning* but are all tending to confirm us that the Word is to be underftood in the find Senfe, as the true God, to both. - The Socinianswere fo fenfible of the force of the Names and Attributes of God, that to evade it, rather than acknowledge Chrift to be God, they pretend that the Attributes of God are no Criteria of the divine Nature ; and deny that thefe Attri- butes are fuch Perfedions of the Divinity, as we aver them to be ; but that they are rather a fome- thing different from God, fomething between God and a Creature. So Adam Goflavius f and others : The * Modefl Plea, £148, f Goflavius contn Kecherman, p.i. e. \. fag. 71. Quid len- ds de attributis Dei ? refpondeo, efle medium five effs tertiurn F % 3 uld 68 Adoration due to Chriji Chap. 5. The divine |j Attributes are fomething, Tome third thing between God and the Creature, the Faculties of God, and the Powers of God ; nay, and the Eternity of God cannot be God himfeif ; for it is falfe that ail is God that is in God. But is not this plain Diftraction ? Oh when Men are wife beyond Revelation, how does God give them up to a repro- bate Mind ! When Men wilfully depart from the right way, what amazing Folly and Madnefs do they run into 1 But no more of this ; I fhall only obferve, that it is a peculiar Providence of God, that he has vouchfafed us fuch a number of Evidences for the Proof of our Lord's Divinity : lefs raoft certainly might have done ; but divine Wifdom forefeeing what Oppofitron the Gofpel of God manifefl in the F/eJb would meet with, purpofely guarded it with fo many, fo great and powerful Arguments, that were it poifible fome (ingle Evidence might by the Craft of the Devil be eluded, the Power of the whole fliould never be overcome. And God's Providence is the more eminent in this, becaufe the Confequence is fo very great ; for God would never have brought fo many concurring Teftimonies of a Creature's Dignity to rob him- feif of his Honour, and to deceive the World ; for if we be deceiv'd in this Article of Faith, it is not Man, but God that has deceiv'd us : but as this is quid inter Deum 6c creaturam. Quid eft hujufmodi, inquies ? ^Eternitas aio, & a&iones Dei, turn facultates illee quibus Deus a<*it quicquid vult. And pag, 2,7. c. 3. par, 1. Falfum eft Deum efTe quicquid in Deo eft. || Jonas Schlichtingius, p. 11. contr. Melfner. Ponamus enim falfum efle ut quidem eft, illorum fententiam, qui perfuafum ha- bent omnia div'na attributa, puta Dei fapientiam, potentiam, bonitatem, voluntatem, 6c quicquid illi inefte Scriptura tefta- tur, efTe ipfum Deum. * not Chap. 5 . becaufe he is God. 69 not reconcilable to -eternal Juftice, Veracity and Goodnefs ; fo God for the Honour of his own e- ternal Son, took all that care and pains to convince us of his Divinity, and furnifti'd us with fo many excellent Arguments to plead in his behalf, that we might honour the Son, even as we honour the Father. . And accordingly all the Churches of God in all the Difpenfations, in all Ages of the World, whe- ther Patriarchal, Jewifh or Chriftian, were tram d up in the knowledge of the Son of God, and to know him as the God of their Salvation, tho in different Degrees, by thofe very Criteria that are here given of the Divinity of Chrift. And truly upon full Confideration we may believe, that all Mankind would deem it the higheft Blafphemy to afcribe thefe lofty Titles, thefe fublime Attributes, thefe Almighty Works, to any created Being, which are the only Charaders whereby the Nature of the one only and true God, can be made known to us. And yet we find that from the very Age that Chrift himfelf \W&-> all Chriftians have afcrib'd them to Chrift, and ftoutly defended them agajnft the He- reticks in every Age; and have accordingly ador'd and worfhip'd Chrift. as the eternal God, the only one and God, to whom all Honour and Veneration is due. m . For thefe Evidences, which the holy Scriptures have given us, in Words as plain, as intelligible as poflibly could be exprefs'd, have had fuch powerful Influence upon mens Minds, and not the unthink- ing part of Mankind, but on the moft learned , judicious, prudent, and fcrupulous, the wifeft and moft confiderate, that they were forc'd, to embrace * Grotius de Veritat. Rel. Chr. I. z. $.. $, 4. 70 Adoration due to Chrijlfac. Chap.y. the Evidence of Truth, and ftoop'd down with Joy and Gladnefs, to give glory to the Son of God, and to adore God in the Trinity of Perfons, in the Unity of the divine Majefty, and worfhip'd the Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft, as the one and only GocL chap. yx C ,H A P. VI. Trecefits of the Scripture that enjoin us to ivorjhip Chriji as God. U T perhaps it will be faid, that all that I have faid hitherto is nothing to the purpofe ,* that this is neither Pre- cept nor Example. I come therefore now to (hew you both Precept and Example ; and /hall give you enough of both to convince any Man. But what I have thus largely proved concerning the Divinity of Chrift was extremely to the pur- pofe, that being the very Foundation, Ground and Reafon of Adoration : For we have not a. God who is a Creature, a God made in Time, a God of yef- terdav, a nominal God, fuch as Socims and mofl of his Followers worfhip ; but we worfhip the true God, and glory herein, that we have not a created Being, but the eternal God, for the Object of our Worfhip and Adoration. But before I come to Particulars, I mufl obferve, that we in our Adoration, worfhip the Triunal God, the three Perfons in the Unity of the divine v Majefty, not excluding but always including the Son and Holy Spirit. And tho we fometimes, nay and often, pray to God the Father only, without praying dire&ly to the Son or Spirit, we do not then exclude them ; but we fo pray, becaufe the F 4 Father ?i 'Precepts for worfhipphig Chap.6. Father is the Fcntal Divinity, and becaufe we are . directed fo to pray even by his Son. Divines obferve, That the Word God is fome- times ufed wMt, that is. efientially ,• and then the three Perfons, Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft: are included and invoked ; and whenever the Word God is ufed with particular reference to the Father, or Son, or Spirit, that is exprefled U7rostt7i*»*, perfo- nally. As Mat. iv. 7. 7%ou)bah not tempt the Lord thy God: And ver. 10. Thou jhalt zvorjhip the Lord thy God : And John iv. 24. God is a Spirit' In thefe and other Piaces the Word is taken eflentially, foiv^ the Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft, three Perfons in the Unity o[ the divine Nature. It is ufed perfo- nally, as Jcfan xiv, 1. Ye believe in God, for the Fa- ther ; 1 1 im. in. 16. God is manifeft in the Flejh, for the Son ; Acts v. 4. Thou haft lyed unto God, for the Holy Ghoft ; for fo it is explained ver. 3. The fame is obferved of the Word Father alfo, that it is eflentially ufed for God, who is called the Father of Spirits, Heb. sii- 9- and the Father of ally 1 Cor. viii. 6. and the Gentiles ukd to call God by the Name of Father : But by the Revelation God has given us of his own Nature, that Word Fa- ther fo ejfextial/y ufed, includes all the three Perfons, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft. And fo God is our Father, Mat. vi. 4. and our heavenly Father, Mat. v. \6. And fo it is alfo ufed perfonally for the firft: Perfon of the facred Trinity, The Father, in a hun- dred Places of Scripture : Nay, and the Son is alfo called by Ifaiah, Chap. ix. 6. The everlafling Father • where, under Correction, the Hebrew fignifies the Father of Eternity, and fo Junius and Tremcllius ren- der it, and the marginal Notes of our old Verfion have it, the Author of Eternity ; and the laft Belgick Verfion *, and the French. f 0/1618, "®mx MX CCttfotgiW* Pc're d'Eternirc. But Chap. 6. Chriftas God. 75 But that we may pray to the Son of God Chriil Jefus, and to the Holy Spirit directly, we have not only Warrants from Examples in Scripture, but we are enjoined fo to do; which Injunctions will ap- pear as bright as the Sun in full Glory. For there is no Act of Adoration fo exalted, nor Supplication fo low, nor Veneration fo high, nor Honour, Glo- ry, Praife, Thankfgiving, or Obedience, required of us, to be paid to the Father, but what is alfo re- quir'd of us, in Words of equal Weight, and by equal Strength of Expreffion, to be paid to Chrift the Son of God. I come now to Particulars, and the firft Precept is of Faith and Reliance. I begin with this firft* becaufe St. Paul has laid it the Foundation of all Worfhip, and the princi- pal Article of Adoration, Heb. xi. 6. For without Faith it is impoffible to pleafe him ; for he that cometh to God mufl believe that he is, and that he is a Reward- er of them that diligently feek him. And this Faith and Reliance, which we are bound to have in the Father, we are by the fame Scripcures required to have in the Son. In the Father. In the Son. John xvii. 3. This is John xvii. 3. This is Life eternal* that they might Life eternal, that they might know thee the only true God. know thee the only true God, John xiv. 1. Let not your and Jefus Chrift whom thou Heart be troubled, ye believe haflfent. in God. John xiv. 1. Let not your Heart be troubled, ye believe in God, believe alfo in me. And here I muft obferve, ; A there be any extraor- dinary Strength in the Expreffion of believing in, as 74 Precepts for wor/hipping Chap.6. as St. Auftin firft, and the Schoolmen after him, and feveral eminent Proteftants affert, of a mod Angu- lar Significancy, that it is the higheft and mod ex- cellent Act or Degree of Faith ; the wknweict, or full Affurance of the Underftanding, which St. Paul fpeaks of Col. ii. i. higher than which a Chriftian cannot go in this prefent Life : 1 fay, if there be any Strength in that ExprefTion, which, however, I dare not fay *, but if there be, then it is here equal- ly ufed of the Son as of the Father. But whether there be or be not any thing extraordinary in the Form of Words, I am very fare there is in the Du- ty required ; namely, that whatever Faith, Reli- ance, Hope, Truft, or Confidence, we are to put by virtue of God's Excellencies, and his Dominion over us, in God, we are to put the fame Faith, Reliance, Hope, Truft, and Confidence in the Lord Jefus, and that becaufe of his divine Excellencies, and his Dominion over us as God, and our Re- deemer. When we confider Jer. xvii. 7. Blejfed is the Man that trufleth in the Lord, and whofe H.ipe the Lord is ; and on the contrary, Curfed be the Man that trufleth in Man, and maketh Flejh his Arm, and whofe Heart departeth from the Lord, ver. 5. when, I fay, we du- ly weigh this, and compare it with the Text of St. John, requiring our Faith and Reliance in Jefus Chrift, equally as in the Father, -muft we not con- clude that Jefus is the fame God with the Father, cr that his Gofpel draws us away from God, and expofes us to the direft Curfes ? But as we know that the End of the Gofpel is to bring us to God, and fpeaks Peace to Believers, fo we are allured that this Jefus in whom we muft believe equally as in the Father, is God, is the Son of God, of the fame divine Nature with the "* See Heylin on the Creed, p. 5, &c. Crit* HiJI. of the Creed, Father^ Chap. 6. Chrtjl as God. 75 Father, whofe Glory is equal, whofe Majefty is co-eternal. And we are further affur'd by the fame Scriptures, that God the Father, for the higheft Demonftration of his Love towards us, has given us this very Jefus, that we might believe in him, and be happy thro' that Faith. I am fure our Saviour fays Co, John iii. 16. Fur Godfo loved the World, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whofoever believeth in him fhould not perifi, but have everlafting Life : For God feat not his Son into the World to condemn the World? but that the World thro him might be faved. And it is very remarkable, that St. John, who wrote his Gofpel purpofely to vindicate and prove the Divini- ty of Chrift mere than the other Evangelifts, infills on this Duty of believing in him, in a very extra- ordinary manner : As, John iii. 3 6. He that believeth on the Son hath everlafting Life, and he that believeth not the Son Jhall not fee Life, but the Wrath of God ahi- deth on him. Chap. vi. 29. This is the Work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath fent : And elfe- where *. For this Chrift is he to whom give all the Prophets witnefs, that thro his Name whofoever believeth in him Jhall receive Remiffion of Sins^ Ads x. 43 . From whence, and a World of Places more in the New Teftament, we have a fuflicient Warrant and Pre- cept for believing in Chrift, which is the principal Part of Worfhip and Adoration. Nay, the Scripture proves that believing in Chrift: is actually believing in God ; for when Paul and Sh las had exhorted the Keeper of the Prifon, Ads xvi. 31. To believe on the Lord J(-fus Chrift, it is faid, ver. 34. That when he was baptised he rejoiced, believing in God with all his Houfe. * John vi-. tj, 45, 47. lx. •$<, 36, 38. xx. 31, &c. The 76 Precepts for worshipping Chap.6, The fecond Precept is, To love God. This Duty God requires of us as our God, Cre- ator, and Benefa∨ and alfo for our own Sakes, that our Love of God may return with a Bleffing unto us. The Scripture requires this Duty of us, as Part of that Worfhip we owe God,- and requires it equally to the Son of God, as to God the Fa- ther. To the Father. Deut. vi. 5. Thou Jh alt love the Lord thy God with all thine Hearty with nil thy Soul) and with all thy Might. Judg. v. 3 1. Let all thine Enemies perijh^ Lord, but let them that love him be as when the Sun goeth forth in his Might. Pfal. v. 12. They that love thy Name [hall be joy- ful in thee* Mat.xxii.37* Thou Jh alt love the Lord thy God with all thy Heart, and with all thy Soul, and with all thy Mind. To the Son. Mat. x. 37. He that lo- veth Father or Mother more than me, is not worthy of me ; and he that loveth Son or Daughter more than me, is not worthy of me. John viii. 42. If God were your Father, ye would love me-, for I proceeded forth and came from God, neither came I of my felj\ but he fent me. 1 Pet. i. 8. Whom ha- ving not feen ye love, in whom tho now ye fee him not, yet believing, ye rejoice with Joy unfpeakable, and full of Glory. Eph. vi. 24. Grace be with all them that love our Lord Jefus Chrifi in Sincerity. Amen> 1 Cor. xvi. 22. If any Man love not the Lord J ef us Chrifl, let him be Anathema Mar an at ha. Now if any Man will confider and compare thefe Texts, he will fee that the Duty of loving Chrifl is not only enjoin'd, but is inforced with a Eene- diftion Chap. 6. Chrifi as God. yj diction to the obedient, and with the Penalty of a dreadful Curfe to the difobedient. Anathema Maranatha : Our Englijh Verfion of 1 599, reads this Verfe, Let him be had in Execration, Maran-atha ; and in the Margin thus explains it, R. Prim mn hoc, quod nobis certain orandi rationem prcefcrip- ferit quae in Matth. vi. habetur. || Smal. contr, Frantz. d'ifp. 7. p. 229. "** £L 3 9. &ac. Cat. Quid preierea Dominus Jefus huic prse- cepto primo nddiHit ? JR. Id, quod etiamnum Dominum Tefum pro Deo cognofce- re tenemur, id eft, pro eo, qui in nos poteftatem habet divinam, 5c cui nos divinum exhibeie honorem obftri&i fumus. fuch Chap. 6. Chrtjl as God. 8 5 an one that has divine Power over us) and to pay him religious Worfhip, as the Racovian Catechifm exprefles it. This is ftrange, that Chrift fhould enjoin this, that this fhould be the peculiar Precept of Chrift, and yet there fhould be no Precept of worfhipping Chrift extant in the Scriptures, as Socinus avers, and Staunton from him. See Page 8. How inconfiftent are thefe Men with themfelves, at one time to aflert, at another time to deny what they afierted before ! But in Anfwer to their Pro- portions : Firfi, It is entirely falfe that the Duty of Prayer was never enjoined in the Old Teftament ; for Dent. vi. 5. we find, Thou Jhalt love the Lord thy God with all thine Heart, and with all thy Soul, and with all thy Might, which cannot be without Prayer and Adoration : And Ver. 13. Thou Jhalt fear the Lord thy God, and ferve him, and Jhalt /wear by ^ his Name^ which cannot be done without Invocation. What is the Meaning of this Precept, Pfal. L 15. Call upon me in the Day of Trouble ; and that Ifa. lv. 6. Seek the Lord while he may be found, call upon him while he is near; and that, Ifa. Ivi. 7. Mine Houfejh all be cal- led a Houfe of Prayer for all People ? The Examples of Perfons praying, and the Pray- ers recorded, are fo frequent, that I need not name them. And as to a Form of Prayer, there never was any Age of the Church without a Form : Before the Flood, as foon as the Sons of God had feparated themfelves from the Sons of Men, they had a Form of Worfhip, certain Rites, certain Sacrifices, and certain Prayers ; and no doubt but the Prayers were equally reveal'd as the Sacrifices were : And it ap- pears from the Epiftle of Jude, that there were even in his Timefome Remains of the Antediluvian Li- turgy, call'd the Book of Enoch * \ which Book con- * See L. Daneus de orat. domin. c. 1 1. p. 30. G 3 taind 86 Precepts for worflotpping Chap.6. tain'd the Prayers of the firft World, as TertuQian and Augafiin think * : and the Jews are of Opinion that feveral of the Pfalms were composed before the Flood, and refer v'd for the Ufe of the Jewifh Church. After the Flood, we find a Prayer of Abraham, Gen- xviii. 27. the Liturgy of Ifaac, Gen. xxxii. 9. and the Form of Mofes, Exod. xxxiv. 9. All which are recorded, not only to atfure us that God is the God of Order in all the Churches, but to confront thole Men that with Falihood and Lyes go about to deceive. As icon as God had given the Jews his Laws as the Form of Obedience, he gave them alfoaForm of Prayer f ; and we find that Mofes ufed it, and it was ufed by the Kings of If ae I many Years after ||. The Prophets composed Forms of Prayer fuitable to particular Occaiions ; as the Prayer for the Sab- bath, Pfal.xciu the Prayer for the Feafl: of Taber- nacles, Pfal. cxviii. and that it was ufed on that Feftival we find Ezra iiu n. the Prayer for the fick, PfaLcii. and the Pfalms of Degrees were the daily Form of Common Prayer thro'out the Year. And the Jews tell us, and it appears alfo from Je- remy *, Hubakkuky Joel, and other of the Prophets, that they had peculiar Forms of Prayer, when in Captivity, in War, or in Times of Peltilence or Famine : And Agur's Prayer feems to have been compos'd for daily Devotion, Prov. xxx. 7. After the Prophets, John the Baptift taught the Jews another Form of Prayer, which altho it be not extant, we believe was in the Name of the Meffia?, not to come, as the Prophets ft, but as already come. * Tcrt. habit, mnlier. Auguft. civ. Dei, 1. 15. c. 23. I Exod xxxiv. 9. Numb. vi. 24. II 1 Kings viii. Ezra ix. * * Jer, xxxii, Hab. iii. Joel ii. -ff Dan. ix. 17. And Chap. 6. Chrijl as God. 87 And when Chrift the eternal Son of God came, and gave us his moft excellent Form, he Templed not to colled the Petitions out of the feveral Forms of Prayer, then in ufe among the Jews- But of this fee Chap, 9. So much in anfwer to the firft Propoficion, which the Socinians borrowed from the antient Manichees, who held that Chrift made Prayer an Addition to the firft Commandment • and that Prayer was not known to the Fathers, nor requir'd under the Mofaic Difpenfation : But that this is moft nororioufly falfe, appears from what has been faid. As to the fecond Proportion, That the Worfhip of Chrift is an additional Precept to the firft Com- mandment, a Precept enjoined by Jefus Chrift him- felf ; how this can be reconciled to the Aifertion and pofitive ExprefTion of Socinus, Page 8. and of Mr. Staunton horn him, Page 35. that there is neicher Precept nor Example to worfhip Chrift as God, I cannot tell, nor do I believe any Man living can re- folve. Both cannot be true, that's certain ,• and that there is neither Precept nor Example, I have in part, and fhall further prove the contrary. But if it were true, that Chrift enjoined fuch a Law for his own Worfhip, that would be no Addi- tion to the Law, but a total Deftru&ion of the Law, nothing more contrary to the Law ; for the firft Precept, Thou Jh alt have no other Gods before me, for- bids all and every Kind of divine Worfhip to be paid to any Being whatfoever, beftdes God : and therefore the making a created Being a God, exalt- ing him to the higheft Degree of Honour, and gi- ving divine Adoration to him, if that be not con- trary to, and a Violation of the firft Commandment, then that Commandment cannot be violated. And as to matter of Fad, that Chrift waswor- fhipp'd in the Old Teftament, and that there are Precepts relating to his Worfhip, nothing is more G 4 plain : 88 Precepts for worfhipping ChapA plain: Pfal. ii. 12. Kifs the Son ; Pfal. xlv. 11. He is thy Lord, and worfiip thou him ; and that Daniel prayed for the Lord's fake, Chap* ix. 17. and that all the Jews prayed for the Mediation of the Meffi- as, for which Reafon they prayed towards the Tem- ple, and towards the Ark of the Covenant, the Type and Figure of Chrift, is beyond all doubt : And that Chrift was worfhipp'd in the Old Tefta- ment, and before, as well as in the New, I fhall (hew at large prefently. And for a plain and pofitive Precept for worfhip- ping Chrift as God, nothing can be more plain and pofitive than that Text, Rom.x. 13. For whofoever JhaU call upon the Name of the Lord Jhall be faved. And that this was fpoke of Chrift appears from the Context, for no other Perfon but Chrift is men- tioned ; for at the 4th Verfe Chrift is called the End of the Law, and at the 12th Verfe, Lord over all; and theNeceflky of believing in and confeffing of him is urged at the 9th VcrCe, If thou Jhalt confefs with thy Mouth, and Jhalt believe in thy Heart, that God has raifed him from the dead, thou Jhalt befaved. And the Apcftle citing feveral Texts out of the Old Teflamcnt, does not fignify that Perfon to be any other than Chrift, but fully demonftrates that this Chrift was known to and called upon by the Fathers of the Old Teftament. And the Duty of calling upon Chrift in this Text, is enjoin'd not (imply, but under a Penalty no kfs than Damnation. What muft .we think therefore of fuch Men as dare openly aver the contrary ? What Front muft we fuppofe them to have, to impofe upon the World fuch notorious Falfhoods ? Is there no Pre- cept to worfhip Chrift as God? Are Faith, Love, Honour, Service, and Invocation, no Worfhip ? Why then what is Worfhip ? Wherein does divine Worfhip coniift, it not in thefe Duties ? What pe- culiar Worfhip does the Scripture afcribe to the only Chap. 6. Chrijl as God. 89 only one God, which it does not afcribe and re- quire us to pay to the Lord Jefus Chrift ? Nay, I dare be fo bold as to challenge any Socman or Ami- trinitarian^ any Enemy to Chrift, to (hew me any Ad of Worfhip, or Homage, or Adoration, or O bedience, which is to be paid to the fupreme God, which is not by the Scriptures given to Jefus Chrift, and required of us by pofttive Precept to be paid to the Lord Chrift. That Chrift was worfhipp'd as God, their great Mafter Socinus has more than once acknowledged ; and either that, or the Fear of the Civil Power, moved him to do the fame, whatever he taught others, or denied before. What muft we think of thefe Men ? Are they judicially blinded that they cannot fee, or are they wilfully blind that they will not underftand ? Either is dreadful. I would have them remember, that they that flrft refufe to know and worfhip Chrift, may afterwards be given over to a reprobate Mind, and judicially harden'd ; for it is juft with God to withdraw that Light and Grace which Men have abufed, and which they have applied to affront and diflionour their God and Saviour. CHAP. 5>o Injlances of nsoorfhipptng Chap, 7- CHAP. VII. Chriji ador'd as God, by Injlances in the Scripture. Come now to Matter of fa&, and fhaU demonftrate, that the Lord Jefus Chrift has been ador'd and worfhip'd as God, as the true and eternal God, by numerous Infiances recorded in the Scriptures. Chi ft ador'd as God by the Angels, St. Paul aflures us, that all the Angels of Gc d worfhip'd him at his Incarnation, Heb. i. 6. Ulmi be bringeth in the fir ft born into the World > he faith, let all the Angels of God worjhip him * And David tells us, that the Angels of God worfhip'd him before his Incarnation, Pfal xcvii.7. JVorJhip him all ye Gods ; which the Septuagint have render'd worjhip him all his Angels ; for the Hebrew Elohim, Gods, is a Name fometimes given to Angels, becaufe of their exalted Strength and Power f. And they are call'd upon in that Pfalm, which is a Prophecy of the Kingdom of Chrift the Meffias, to worlhip and adore him. And if this Worfhip * Ambrof. in loc. Ad altiora mentem noftram elevat, ut fcia- tnus ilium, qui came indutus eft, & pallus eft pro nobis, ab An- gelas adoratum. \ Buxtorf. Lex. pag. 19. had Chap. 7. Chrifi as God. 9 1 had not been paid by the Angels to Cbrift, the A- poftle could not have produc'd that pfalm for the proof of it ; but from that Allegation it is evi- dent, that the Gods, or Angels, worfhip'd Chrilt as well before as at his Incarnation. Jefus Chrifi worfiifd as God by Men. And as Chrifi was worfhip'd by the Angels, fo he was likewife worfhip'd by the Sons of Men as their God, as the only true and eternal God : And the Scriptures are as clear in this Particular as Words can exprefs or Fad demonftrate. Chrift was worfhip'd as God in every Difpenfa- tion, by Adam, by the Antediluvian Fathers, by Noah in the Ark, by the Patriarchs, by Mofes and Jojbua, by the Ifraelites in the Wildernefs, by David and the Prophets, by the Apoftles and Chriftians to this very time. And the matter of fad of this Adoration is recorded with fo much Care, Caution, and Concern, that after all, if God the Son was not worfhip'd equally with the Father as God, we muft conclude that then neither has God the Father been worfhip'd, from the Creation of the World to this Day. But before I proceed I muft lay down this Axiom, that God the Father in ail the Appearances God was pleas'd to make to Mankind, never appear'd vifible himfelf, but always by the *ODD, the Mamre, that is, the Word, as St. John expreily calls him, John I 1. and that according to what is laid, Exod. xxxiii. 20. Thou canft not fee my Face, for there Jhalino man fee me and live : and to what our Saviour fays, that no man hath feen the Father, John vi. 46. and chap. v. 37. Ye have neither heard his Voice nor feen his Shape. Every Revelation of God is thro* Chrifi his Son, who is the Revealer and Interpre- ter of the otherwife unknown Father, and his Will to 92 Inflames of worfhipphig Chap.7. ro Men. This Order and OEconomy in the Per- fons of the facred Trinity, is what we ought hum- bly to adore and reverence, rather than pry too cu- rioufly into ; left pretending to be wife above what is written, w« fall into Errors, and lofe our felves in inextricable Mazes : for to fay * that the to Oho?, the fontai Divinity, became vifible, is extreme er- roneous i for no man has feen God at any time, the only begotten Son, which is in the Bofom of the Father, be has declar'd him, John i. 1 8. 7 he Logos, or Word, explain* d. And becaufe our Adverfarieshave with a world of Art endeavour'd to perplex and entangle Mens Minds, about the .true meaning of the Logos, or Word, I fhall give a clear Explication of the Phrafe, and mew, That it was a Term and Expreffion to fignify a Divine Per/on, both by Jews and Gentiles ; and that it was ufed long before and after the Age that St. John wrote his Gofpel ,• and that it was that very Expreffion, whereby the Jews underftood the Meffias, The Word, or Logos, taken by the Jews for a Divine Perfon. As for the Jews, how and in what Senfe they ufed it, is evident from the Septuagint, and Philo y and the Chaldee Paraphrafe, namely, for a Divine Perfon: {ox Ez,ek, i. 24. the 70 have changed Shad- dai, the undoubted Name of the omnipotent God, into koyet, the Word; which to be fure they would * Eufebius demonft. Evang. /. 5. c. ?. p. 234. See BifljopBxxll def. N. F. p. 11, 13,146. not Chap. 7. Chrifi as God. 93 not have done, had they not thought this Word a divine Perfon. Philo the Jew, who livM in the Age St. John wrote his Gofpel, exprefly calls this Word tev- litfv Qiov, the fecond God, next to the riajs*?' wr w&vlw, Father of all things * ; and elfewhere t that the Word is fuperior to the whole World, and more antient and general than any thing that is made. And again, fpeaking of the World's being the Tern* pie of God, he fays, in which Temple the High- prieft is the firft-born divine Word of God |). And in another Book he fays, this divine Word is fu- perior to all things ; it has no vifible Species by which it may be likened to any fenfible thing, but is it felf the Image of God, the mod antient of all Intelligibles, and next to the moft High, be- tween whom and him there is no Medium **. And Grotius ft fays, that this Philo taught that the Word of God is the Maker of the World, not un- begotten as fs God the Father of all, nor yet be- gotten in like manner as Men are. And again, that Word of God is the Angel or Ambaflador of God, who takes care of the Univerfe. And he- further quotes fome antient Cabalifls, who diftin- guifli God into three Lights, which fome of them call by the fame Names we Chriftians do, viz,. Fa- ther, Son or Word, and Holy Ghoft. The Chaldee Paraphrafe, which is one of the mofl antient Monuments of Jewifh Learning, con- * Quaeft. & Solut. Xj yiVlMTetJoS TUV OffK yiytvi* Leg. Alleg. I. 2. II iv $. T>e Somn. ** P uVeg^'iw T«1«w hoy>s 8«W, els o^/jm xk j'aQsv \Hm-> an ^wJW tuv kclt di&idMC dvjos hkoJv v-na^yuv &SK, TUV VOilJaV CL7rt%a, (VdlVluV WfiffGvTttlof) iyyV7VLTW, (M\^// befaved by the Lord, with be fayed by the Word of everlafting Salvation* God> with an everlafling Salvation. They that defire more may confult * Ritt an gel, who had been a Jew, and was well skilled in the Jewifh Learning ; and there they may find that Mamre is a divine Perfon, and divine Sublicence, and never ufed by the Chaldee Paraphraft otherwife. Since therefore it is evident, that by this Word they meant a Perfon ; and fince to this Perfon they afcribe not only the Name, but the Worship of God, it is plain they believed him to be a divine Perfon ; and accordingly, Chalcidius ad'Timaum, in that Book where he profeffes to explain the Do&rines of the Jews, whom he calls the holy Seel:, delivers this as their Senfe of this divine Word j. This Word of God is God y taking care of human Affairs, and is the Caufe or Principle by which Men may live well and happily, i^ they do not neg- lect this Gift which the fupreme God has granted to them. And to the fame pnrpofe Celfus> fpeaking the Senfe of the Jews, exprefly tells us |], We agree with you, that the Word is the Son of God. I come now to fee how the Gentiles ufed it, and that they alfo underftood by it a divine Perfon. What the Gentiles knew of the Trinity is not my prefent Bufinefs to examine ,• what they had, they received from the Hebrews^ and fo grievoufly depraved and adulterated, that nothing can be made of it but Confufion. However, they that defire to * Rittangel in Jefirah, p. 96. •\ Et ratio Dei Deus eft, humanis rebus confulens, qux caufa eft hominibus bene beateqj vivendi, fl non conceflum fibi munus a fummo Deo negligant. know 9 6 Injlances of worjbipping Chap.7. know may confult Agrippa *, Gale f, and others ; it is enough for my purpofe to know what they un- derftood by Word, The Aoyo{ y or Word, how ufed by the Gentiles. This TertulJian will tell us,who has thefe Words |j : Zeno has declai'd thatjthe Koyot, the Word, is the Ma- ker of the World, who formed all things in due Tem- per, and is call'd Fate and God, and the Soul of Jupiter. Orpheus fays, that the Word is the divine and im- mortal King **. Numenius the Tythagorean, as he is quoted by St. Csril]\, calls the Father the flrft, and the Word the fecond God. And Plotinus |]|| alfo, fpeaking of this divine Mind or Word, fays this Nature is God, a fecond God. The Logos, or Word, is the very Expreffion ufed by the Jews to fignify the Mejjias. That the Jews meant not only a divine Perfon by the Word, but even that very Meflias which they looked for, is evident, not only becaufe they give him the very fame Characters, which the New Teftament gives to our Saviour; but alfo attribute to him the Very fame Offices that the New Tefta- ment attributes unto Chrift. * Cornel. Agripoa Occult. Philof. 1 3. c. 8. f Gale Court of the Gentiles, Part IV. 1. z. p. 382. || Ten. Apologet. 36 Vam. Hunc (r Koy>v) Zeno determinat faci:itoiem qui cunda in difpofitione formaverit, eundemque 8c fatum vocari, 5c Deum & animum Jovis. ** Clem. Strom. !. <,. p. 607. hoy>v QeioV, cLv&k\a&§cLvcl\w> ■j-f Cyril Qontr. Julian. 1. 8. Illl Plotinus Enn. 5- k 5- c. 3. xj fch oivjn w . 'Chrtft as God. 97 Firfl-, the Jews give the. Word the fame Charac- ters the Gofpel gives Chrift. Philo fays the Word is the Character of God, and the Image of God * ; anfwerable to St. Paul, Heb. i. 3 . The exfrefs Image of his Perfn. The Bread and Food which God has given to the Soul f ; anfwerable to John vi. 33, 35. / am the Bread of Life. The Jews fay, the Word is the Hcufe. of the Father in which he dwells || ,• agreeable to John xiv. 10. Bel; eveft thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in me ? but the Father that dweJIeth in me, he doeth the Works. Secondly, The Jews attribute to the Word the fame Offices that the New Teftamcnt afcribes to thrift. So they fay, the Word or divine Logos is the Go- vernor of all Things, and the Viceroy of the greit Kin? ** j and that Gcd who is King and Parlor of the World, has appointed the Word, his firft-be- gotten Son, to undertake the Care of his facred Flock as his own Viceroy and Su'bfHtute ft- Nay, the fame Philo has a PalTage relating to the Word, as the lnterceflbr between God and Man, which is highly worthy of our Obfervation f||L S. , |||| Ibid, de Azricut I. 1. To q " h^yary^M^ xj <7r^ hbyo, saV i^a.i^{\ov 'ifmiv tc£ cMcc )W»)ca* Tarn?, iv* H u ture 9 8 Inflances of worjhipping Chap.7. H tureand the Creator; ana he always fupplicates " the immortal God for Mortals, and is the Em- Ct baflador from the fupreme King to his Subje&s : " and in this Gift he rejoiceth,as highly valuing him- " felf upon it, faying, I flood in the Middle between vtcl\o? 0g» Ao^r -f bid. 16 leg. alleg. I. 2. \\^vz. ^ II vlonn. En. <,. 1. i. c 6. 3 Am' J^ eLvdyms owfctv rft/Tp, toS tm Z7i?o}m7 (j.6voV Ki%>>ex£rtti. ** "Afjiov )y h)(jjxfy>\. tt Ou (xoVf/oj/) lsTtf?g h'o-ps o •mVTzaV QeibrXToS* ||i| "O^avov es« «Ti « o jtotrfMX y&Ttt *} tpa} *VJ« ytv'otwov x»#P. philo I, de perfeftiore. Illl H&9$VTwnv %v >mv thav dvir&te W?«f . Philo ibid. *f n$QTQ7WV ipv 0£¥. Philo de agricttlt. /. 1. H 3 T ^ us ,102 Inflames of wor/bifiping Chap.7. Thus you fee St. John fpeaks of Chrift in fuch a manner, as both Jews and Gentiles might underftand of whom he fpake, namely of a divine Perfon, a divine Subfiftence. The Apoftles, when they preached Chrift to the Jews and Gentiles, ufed fuch Words as were known to them, and underftood by them ; they coin'd no new ones, nor did they put new Conftructions upon them unknown to the World before ; they fpake in the plained: and moft intelligi- ble manner, and made ufe of fuch Words as Jews and Gentiles had ufed before, that both Jews and Gen- tiles might underftand them. When therefore St. John fpeaks of his Word, and in the fame Phrafe and Language gives the fame Account of him as the Jewifh and Gentile Divines did of • theirs, he muft be fuppofed to mean the fame Thing by him, namely, A divine eternal Perfon, or to defign to make the World believe that he meant fo. For he that fpeaks or writes in common Phrafes, muft mean according to the common Ac- ceptation of thofe Words and Phrafes ; or if he do not, he muft be a moft notorious Juggler and Dif- fembler. So that if St. John wrote (incerely what he thought of Chrift, every Man that reads him, and underftands his Words, muft believe that that Chrift is a divine Perfon, and that he is the Saviour. And that St. John was fo underftood by Amelius, a Pagan Philofopher (who very well underftood the Language and Do&rine of the Gentile Schools, concerning the divine Word, fo often mentioned. in their Writings,) appears ; for he calling his Eyes up- on the Text of St. John, does with all Confidence affirm, this was that Word, who, according to Heraclitus, exifted from Eternity, and made all Things, and whom, by Jupiter, the Barbarian (meaning the Evangelift) places in the Order and Dignity of a Principal, declaring him to have been with God, and to be God, and that all Things were made Chap. 7- Chrtjl as God. 1 03 made by him, and that in him all Things that were had Life and Being * And now having proved at large, that this Mam- re, this Logos, this Word, is a divine Perfon, is the Meflias, is the Son of God, the eternal God, which is the great Hinge upon which this whole Difcourfe turns ; I proceed to aflert, that it is certain from Mofes, that God appeared to feveral of the Patri- archs, which mud necefTarily therefore be that Mamrey that Word of God. And this is what the Chriftian Fathers affert, that Chnft the Son of God made feveral Appearances to the antient Patriarchs, in the AfTumption of human Bodies, which were momentary AfTumptions only, and figurative of the perfect and lafling Union of the divine Nature of the Son of God with Humanity f- And our Saviour telling the Jews that they had not beard the Father's Voice at any time, norfeen his Shape, or Appearance, John v. 37. which is full Proof that that divine Perfon, who appeared and fpake to the Pa- triarchs in an human Voice or Shape, was not God the Father, and yet it is as pofitively faid that Mo- fes, and Aaron, and the Elders of the Jews, and fe- veral others faw God ; it neceflarily follows, that that God that did appear was the fecond Perfon, diflind from the Father, and yet the felf-fame God. And this is Jefus, whofe Name is called the Word of God, Rev.xix. 13. * Eufeb. Pr&p. Evang, f>, 540. Outo< a&fi w Koy>{, K hvoj xj 0goK «vcu Si a mvV *VA»f y** }*?«<$*/, ck a yntJAVW £ 1. h 4 CHAP, 04 Tloe patriarchs worfhitfd Chap.8 CHAP. VIII. Chrift ivorjhipped by the Patriarchs from Adam to Mofes, and their Altars erected to him. % MM^ Come now to the Fads, and thefe I fhall |&JLi^ t2 ^ e * eave t0 divide * nt0 t ^ iree g reat ■£" Sls£S§ put has. F ft, The Age of the Patriarchs, from Adam to M'fes. Secondly, The Epocha of the Mofaic Difpenfation from Mofes to Chrift. Thirdly, The great Epocha of the Gofpel, from Chrift to this Day. In all thefe Periods of Time Jefus Chrift has been adored as God, and worfhipped with the Fa- ther, and the Holy Spirit, as the one, only, true and fupreme God. Fir ft, 'The Age of the Patriarchs, And Eufebius doubts not to affert, that all the Patriarchs were the Chriftians of the old World, who had the fame Faith, Religion, and Wor/liip, and the fame Name of Chriftians too, as he endea- vours to prove from Pfal. cv. 15. Touch not mine anointed, tuv Xetrav ^», my Chriftians, or my Chrifts *.- But more particularly, * Eufeb. przepar. evang. 1. 1. c. $. p. 9. Adam Chap. 8, Chriji as God. 105 Adam worjhipped Chrifi as God. It is generally agreed among Divines, that Adam in the State of Perfection knew God in Trinity and Unity * : And Epiphanius is raoft pofitive in this Point, who fays f, Adam was not an Idolater, for he knew the Father God, and the Son, and the Ho- ly Ghoft \ for he was a Prophet, and knew that the Father had faid to the Son, Let US make Man. Nay, the fame Epiphanius carries that matter a great deal higher, and fays that Adam, even m the State of Perfe&ion, was a Chriftian, having the Form of Chriftianity, for he was not circumcis'd ; neither was he an Idolater, but had the Form of Chriftianity [|. And ** Jerom Zancbi thinks it very injurious to Adam, to believe that he had not as great Favour fhown him before the Fall, as Abra- ham, Mofe'S) and others had fince the Fall ; and thereupon afferts, that Adam being then to be fure the beloved of God, Jehova the Son exhibited him- felfviflbly to him, and talked with him, and made himfelf known to him, as his God and Governor, before he gave him the Precepts of Obedience, as he did to the Jews, before he gave the Law to Mo- fes. And he tells us, that feveral of the Antients, Juftin, Irenaus, TertuSian, and many more, were of rhat mind, that it was Jehova the Son who crea- ted Adam, placed him in Paradife, appeared vifibly to him, difcourfed with him, and whofe Voice he heard, and at which he trembled when he had tranfgreffed. * Markii compend. theolog. chrifi:. c. i. § 16. WitC ceco- nom. 1. 1. c. z. f Epiph. Panario, p. 9. 'Ouk «JWa*'t*»»k q h, xj wJ\* t«7*££ Stop, XjMov, it, ayiov nffvouyLA. H&Qnlw $ r\v ^ «^« on * tn man > oat ?aet, nit ton a- ran off tot J «Jan«e« ^n cop ijertrmeu fal tefc fal W notn. And the older Belgick Verfions '/155?, and 15^2. read the Text as this* as ic8 The Patriarchs worjhip'd Chap. 8, as Ifch fignifies the Excellency of human Nature : And fhe profeffes his divine Nature, when fhe calls him Jehova ; and that thofe Natures were to be li- nked in one Perfon, the Redeemer, when (he joins thefe two, JTirV DN t^'tt the Man that is the Lord; which St. Paul exprelles by etbv 077o/«V, a quickning Spirit, as St. Paid calls Chrift, i Cor. xv. 45. that fhould in- troduce a better Life ; whence he is alfo called Life 7 John i. 4. f Cain and Abel zuorfiip'd Chrift as God. That Cain and Abel believ'd that fame Gofpel or Promife of a Saviour, cannot be doubted ,• nay, and upon that Faith of the Seed of the Woman, the Man Jehova, as their Mother had explain'd it, they both orler'd their Sacrifices to God. The word Sacrifice, tho it be often us'd for all the Duties of divine Worlhip, yet feems here to relate to that external Form of Worlhip which is call'd IhctTtiU, Expiatory, which they orfer'd to God * Witf. occonom. focderum, 1. 4. c. 1. de viro Jehova, § 35. Traj. 1694. j- Lightfoor. Hor. Heb. in 1 Cor. xv. 45. Witfii occonom. focder. I.4. c I. $ 30, 6c c. p. 569, Sec. in Chap. 8. Chrijl as God. 1 09 in ail probability to ob.ain Pardon for their Parents Tranfgreffion, and the releaie of that Mifery which their Sin had brought upon them, and their Off- fpring. Andthowedo not find, when God was pleas cl firft to inftitute thefe facrificial Rites, yet it is pioufly believ'd they were of his own Appoint- ment, * becaufe of his Acceptance and Confirma- tion, 'and becaufe he afterwards inftituted them by moft pofitive Precepts. And no doubt, but thefe very firft, as they were cflfer'd up to God with a View to the promis'd Seed* the Man-Jehoya^ were Figures of that one only real and propitiatory Sa- crifice of Chrift, who thro' the eternal Spirit, was to cffer up himfelf without Spot to God, for the redemp- tion of the World, Heb. ix. 14. For thefe facrificial Rites had not any propitiatory Power in them by themfelves, of their own Nature, but by virtue of the divine Inftitution, by the Ordinance of Al- mighty God, and by the relation they had to the Meffias the Saviour : and ftich doubtlefs were the Sacrifices of Cain and Abel, and therefore as fueh offer'd to the Son of God, as believing in him as thepromifed Seed; the Man- Jehova. ^ And tho it may be (aid that Cains Offering feem'd rather to be ei^r/JuVhe Sacrifice of Thankf- giving, which he ofter'd to God as a quit-rent, in Teftimony that he held his Eftate from ^ him as the fupreme Landlord, and that Abel's feem'd only Ex- piatory ,• I fliall only anfwer, that we know fo little of that matter, that all we can fay is Conjecture only. But it is plain that Cains Offering not being accepted, w T as not from any miftake in the Objecl: ot his Worfhip, nor in the Subjed of his Oblation, but thro' the default of his own Heart ; and St. Paul I think tells us that his Faith was not fo ftrong as * Dr. Heylin on the Creed, f. 95. Abel\ 1 1 o The patriarchs worjhip'd Chap, 8. Abel's, Heb. xi. 4. By Faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent Sacrifice than Cain : £0 that Cains Crime was Unbelief. Of what? of the promifed Seed of the Man-Jehova, the Redeemer, of Chrift, as the Apoflle there recommends from the happy Ex- amples of the Elders. And if St. Paul be a good Expofitor of the Faith of the Elders, as he un- doubtedly is, then they according to him believed in, and offer'd to Jefus Chrift. For from ver. 19. of the 10th Chap, he fpeaks of Jefus, and of Faith in him : and if we continue in that Faith, it will produce the fame happy Effe&s in .us, as it did in the Worthies mention'd in the nth Chapter, who believed in Chrift Jefus, and by that Faith receiv'd that Teftimony, that they pleas'd God. And that they all believ'd in Chrift, isfurefrom thatlnftance of Mofes, of whom it is faid exprefly that he believed in Chrift ; Ver. 26. Efieeming the Reproach of Chrift greater Riches than the Treafures of Egypt, for he had refpeB unto the Recompence of the Reward. And that they both believ'da Saviour to come, feems to be plain from ver. 7. If thou doft well, Jhak thou not be accepted ? And if thou doft not well, Sin lieth at the door* Where you muft obferve,that the original word Sin does alfo Cignify y an Expiation for Sin, fo that the Verfe will beer this reading ; " If thou u doft not well, then not only the Sin it {df, not " only the Guilt and Punifhment, but alfo the Ex- Cf piation for Sin, the Sacrifice of Propitiation, lies and Enoch pkafed God ; and the Syriac in the fame manner, he p leafed God: which indeed is tanta- mount, becaufe he could not pleafe God without walking with God, and he could not walk wich God without pleafing him. The Seventy have ren- dered the fame ExprefTion, Gen. vi. 9. concerning Noah, in the fame Words, and both the Syriac and Arabic follow them : So tho the Original has not the Word of pleafing God, yet the Senfe is the fame, the one being the Expofition of the other, namely, that to walk with God, is to pleafe God. Noah worjhip'd Chrift as God* That Noah worfhip'd God, and liv'd in a pious Obedience to the Will of God, is certain from that extraordinary Character given him, Gen.vi.p. No- ah was a jufl Man, and perfect in his Generations, and Noah walked with God; which lad is the fame Ex- preflion ufed of Enoch, Chap. v. 24. and is explained Chap* vii* 1. 'Thee have I feen righteous before me in this Generation. And that he knew and worfhip'd the Son of God, is as plain, becaufe the God that fpake to Noah, is Chap.vii. 1. called the Lord, the Jehova, that Perfon of the facred Trinity, by whom all-Re- velations were made, and Communications held with Mankind ,• who is by the Targums call'd the Word of the Lord. And this is confirmed by St. Paid, who numbers this great Man among the antient Heroes, who are recorded for their Faith in Chrift the Son of God, Heb.xi.j. and is further confir- med, for that the very Flood was art Acl: of Judg- ment executed by the Son of God, becaufe all Judg- I ment 1 14 The Patriarchs worfhip'd Chap. 8* merit is given to the Son * ; and St. Peter tells us ex- predy, that Chrifl preached Repentance to the World in the Days o/Noah, while the Ark zvas preparing f> and that Noah was his Servant and Minifter, who is therefore by St. Peter cail'd the Preacher oj Righteouf- nefs. And when, Gen. vii. 16. it is faid, the Lord Jhut Noah in the Ark, that was the Act and Deed of the Son of God j| : And at his Delivery he built an Altar unto the Lord, unto the Word of the Lord, in Thankfgivin^ for his Redemption, the Figure and Pledge of a far greater, i Pet. iii. 20. The antient Jews have a Tradition, that in the Ark there was an 'TcrsppJor, or Place of Prayer, where there was an Appearance of the Glory of the Lord, the divine Sckecinah, which is the Son of God, as I (hall (hew more at large hereafter; before which Glory Noah daily offered up Prayers and Intercefli- ons. And the faid Tradition farther adds, that this Chapel was at or about the Centre of the Ark ; and that the Body of Adam, inclofed in a Shrine, which had been preferved and handed down from Father to Son, was placed in this very Chapel, in the Ark, at the very Place where the Glory of God appear- ed ; and that every Morning at Day-break, which was difcovered by the Zohar, or heavenly Light, that v as in the Ark **, Noah flood up towards the Body of Adam, and before the Lord, the Shecinah appearing over it, and he and his Sons made this Prayer. " O Lord, excellent art thou in thy Truth, and . 241. I 2 prec 1 1 6 The ^Patriarchs worjhip'd Chap.8 . pret between my Word and thee y and between my Word and the Earth ; as if the divine Logos, or Chrift, was made a Party in the Covenant. Which is no lefs than four times repeated in ver. 15, 16. from which it is eminently manifeft, that Noah worftiip'd Chrift as God. Melchizedeck ivorjhip'd Chrift as God. That .Melchizedeck wcrfhip'd Chrift as God, I think is beyond all doubt ,• for he was both a Type of Chrift, and Prieft to Chrift the Son of God : for Gen. xiv. 18. he is called the Prieft of the mo ft high God, and ^ x,e?i», as with the univerfal Lord and Judge i He was the Lord that rained Fire and Brimitoneupon Sodom and Gomcrrab from the Lord out of Heaven ; cc he was his holy Father's Agent in his Communica- " tions with the Patriarchs, and is the fame Perfon *' under the feveral Denominstions-of the Angel, of iC the divine Counf.l, of the Lord, and of God. * c Nowcertainly itmuftarque rank Impiety and Irre- " ligion, to think that Mofes would have call'd any C£ Angelick Power which is therefore neceflarily God : And that fame Angel, ver. 17, 18. exprefles his Be- nediction to Abraham in his Pofterity, and to ail Na- tions of the Earth by his Pofterity, becaufe of A- br ah arris Obedience to his Voice, in Terms fo lof- ty, and afluming a Power which none but the eter- nal God enjoys: I /hall only add, that we find Abraham built an Altar unto the Lord, and that' that Lord was an Angel, which /hews that that Angel was the eternal God,- for had Abraham not known him as fuch, he would never have built an Altar unto him, for that was the higheft Ad of the moft folemn Adoration : And had this Angel not been God, he would .no more have permitted that Worfhip, than the Angel which forbad Manoah, Judg. xiii. 16. or the other which hinder'd St. John, Rev. xxiu 9. I cannot forbear faying, that Abrahams Faith in Chrift was fo Angularly great, that he is not only called the Father of the Faithful, Rom. \v t 11. whofe Faith and Obedience is fet before all the World for Imi- tation, but that even Heaven it felf, the Purchafe of the Elood of Chrift, is called by the Name of Abraham's Bofom, Luke xvi. 22. that Harbour of Reft, and Place of Honour, which all the Saints * St. Cyprian adv. Judaeos, 1. ii. § <. The Synodic Epiftle of the Council of Amioch againfi Paul Samofat. Concil. torn. 1. col. 847. Cyril of Alexandria, com. Julian. 1. 9. p. 19$. who renders it, By my felf have I fwom ^ i. e. By my eternal $m, of one Ef- fence with my felf f Of Onkelos and Jonathan. of Chap. 8. Chrijl asGod. 125 of God (hall enjoy, that follow the Faith, and imi- tate the Obedience of faithful Abraham. It is befide my prefent Purpofe to explain the Reafon of that Expreflion ; but we may be very fure that the Lord Jefus would never have called the State of Reft, Abraham's Bofom, had not Abra- ham believ'd in him, and obey'd him, as the God and Saviour of the World. I have purpofely omitted the Opinion, that the three Perfons of the Holy Trinity, Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft, appeared to Abraham at Mamre> and were known by him as fuch, and yet accofted by him in the fingular Number, and adored in the Unity of the Divinity by him ; becaufe tho many of the Antients, and fome Moderns are of that Opinion, it feems not to be very well grounded, but liable to fome Exceptions, notwithstanding it has been largely defended by a late learned Writer *. And further, I have omitted the Opinion of C«- naus y that Chrift appeared to Abraham in the very felf-fame Form, Features, and Countenance, as he afterwards had when in the Fiefh ; and that this Should be countenanc'd by John viii. 56. be- caufe it is lingular, and Hands in need of Confir- mation f. Hagar worfiifd Chrifi as God. That Hagar was inftruded in the true Religion, in the Knowledge of the Triunal God, and the Co- venant of Grace, and the Expectation of a Saviour, there is no room to doubt, being of Abrahams Fa- mily ; efpecially if we confider what God himfeif fays of Abraham, Gen. xviii. ip. For I knpvj him, * Witfii OEconom. Feeder. 1. 4. c. 3. p. 589. Traj.adRhen. 1694. f Cunaei R. Hebr. !. 3. c. 3. p. 414. Amjlerd. Anno 1681. that i 2 4 The Patriarchs yea he had Power over the Angel and prevail' d ; he wept, and made Supplica- tion unto him, he found him in Bethel, and there he (pake with us, even the Lord God of Hofls y the Lord is his Memorial* Further, we find, Gen* xxxv. 1. that God charged Jacob to go to Bethel, and there to erecl: an Altar un- to God that appeared to him, when he fled from his Brother, thirty Years before. This Place is remarkable, and the Antients have took notice of it : For from hence St. Hilary * dif- putes with irrefiftible Force againft the Arians 3 " Here, fays he, God fpeaks, and he of whom he " fpeaks is God j the divine Character is here e- iJpenfation. Come now to the fecond great Epocha, I jn the Mofaick Difpenfaticn from M/ej to * Chrift. Mofes luorjhip'd Chrifi as God- I come now to the great Prophet Mofes, and aver that he knew and ador'd the Son of God Jefus Chrift as God, and as the Saviour of the World. That Mofes wrote of Chrift, is exprefly declar'd by Chrift himfelf, both before his death, John v. 46. and after his Refurre&ion, Luke xxiv. 27. That Mofes was a faithful Servant of Chrift, St. Paul tells us, Heb. fix . 5. And that he believ'd in Chrift, the fame Apoftle afliires us, Heb.xi. 26. That he was a Friend of God, we find Exod. xxxiii. n. and the greateft of the Prophets ,* for he told the Jews even then, that God would raife them up a Prophet from among their Brethren like unto him, Deut. xviii. 18. And that this Prophet was Chrift, we are afiur'd by no lefs Authority than that of St. John, ch- 1 4?. and St. Peter, Atlsiii. 22. and St. Stephen, ABsv'n. 37- And that the Son of God, as the God of the Co- venant, appeared unto Mofes, as he had dene to the Patriarchs before, is beyond all Contradiction ; and that Mofes worfhip'd him as the true and eter- nal God, will appear as evident, if we confult the K 2 Hiftory \ 3 1 The Jews wor/bip'd Chap. 9. Hiftory recorded in Exodus; concerning which Hiftory I /hall make this Observation only, That the account of the Exodus of Jfrael, and God's receiving them for his Peculium y and giving them the Law, is a moil important Hiftory, in regard to that Article of the Divinity of the Logos or Wordy the great A&or in this facred Tranfa&ion, againfl: which the Powers of Hell have always exerted their utmoft A/ts and Violence, and fhown their fierceft Rage and Malice. For here the Angel of the Lord is not call'd the Angel of Ehhim, as Exod* xiv. ip. but the Angel of Jehova, pointing full upon the gracious Difpen- fation then on foot ,• and the Hebrew may be rendred not the Angel of the Lord, but the Angel> the Lord \ or the "Jehovah : whence the Angel of the Lord may reafonably be thought to be the Logos or Word ; the Lord the Meffias revealing himfelf to Mofes as the Saviour of his People Ifrael at that time, as he was pleased afterwards in the days of his Flefh, id his Transfiguration, to reveal himfelf to this very Mofes as the Saviour of the World, Mat. xvii. 3. But let us confider the Perfon that is the prime Actor and the Legiflator in this great Affair. And this we find Exod. iii. 2. where the Perfon is call'd the Angel of the Lord, which is God the Son ; for at the 4th Verfe he is call'd God, and he is call'd Angel, becaufe he is the Angel of the great Council, the mighty God, even Jefus Chrift * The Targums read it the Word of the Lord. At the 6th Verfe, this Angel ftyles himfelf*/;* God of Abraham, the God of Ifaac, and the God of Jacob ; and there it is alfo faid, that Mofes hid his Face be- caufe he ivas afraid to look upon God ; and ver. 14. he fays, his Name is I AM THAT I AM : all which evidently (hows, that this Angel was God, truly and properly God, and yet not the Father, be- * Juftin Mart. Dial cum Tryph. p. 220, caufe Chap. 9. Chrijl as God. \ 3 3 caufe the Father can in no Senfe be denominated any one's Angel * \ this was therefore Gcd the Son, for no Man has feen the Father and lived f. And God the Son calls himfelf the God of Abra- ham, Ifaac and Jacob, to let Mofer know that he was the very God whom thofe great Patriarchs worfhip'd 3 that God that made the Covenant with them, and that God that promis'd to be che deli- verer of Ifi-ael. And that the Name, / am that I am, is the proper Name of Chrift, and given to drift, I have not only fhow'd be 1 ore, but is far- ther confirm'd by that of c Tertullian || ; we affert, fays he, that all the Appellations of a true and pro- per Divinity, are common to the Son with the Fa- ther, and that the Son came in thefe Names, that he acted in thefe Names, and manifefted himfelf to Mankind in thefe Names. What mov'd Mofes to ask God for another Name, when he had call'd himfelf the God of his Fathers, is not our prefent bufinefs to enquire; but it is remarkable, that the Final Letters of Mofes* s Queftion, DD 123 IP DD >*? what is his Name? make up the moft holy and incommunicable Name nirV Jehova. And the Rabbles have made no fmall Ufe of it, to prove that this Angel of the Lord was the Angel Jehova, Mamre the Word **• Job worfhip'd Chrifl as God That Job, whoever he was, worihip'd the true God is moft certain, and in no wife to be doubted, if he was a Defcendent of Abraham by Keturah ; and it appears mod evident from the Lord's fpeak- * Juftin. Mart. Ap. 2. p. 7$, f Tertull. adv. Judseos, p. i6$, II Tertull. adv. Prax. c. 17. ^ B. Bibl. in Exod. Occaf. Annot. II. p. 45. K 3 wg 134 Job wor/bip'd Chap. 9. ing and revealing himfelf to him, as we find Chap, xxxiii. 15. and efpecially ch. xlii. 5. and alfo from his being mentioned with Nuah and Daniel by the Prophet Ezekiel, ch. xiv. 14. as a Man that knew and fear'd God. Some of the antient Fathers have after ted that Job was a Pried of the moll: high God, as Abel, Noah and Melchiz,edeck *j and others, that he knew God in Trinity and Unity, becaufe he frequently mentions the Spirit of Gcd t : and that he knew the Son of God, and worfhip'd him as fuch, is to me as plain as a Demon ft ration. Not to mention therefore what the Chriftian Fathers have wrote of him [|, we have enough for our purpofe in the facred Book that goes by his Name, and is receiv'd in the Canon of the Holy Scriptures, and there we find, Chap. xix. ver. 25. thefe very remarkable worcs, / know that my Re- deemer liveth, and that he Jh all fl and at the latter day upon the Earth ; andtho after my skin Worms deftroy this Body, yet in my Flefi jhatt I fee God. .In which few words he exprefles his Knowledge of, and his Faith in his Redeemer ; he acknowledges that Redeemer to be God ; he owns there will be aRefurre&ionof the dead, and an Enjoyment of that God by whom he was redeemed. Very great things in few words, and that made one of the Antients fay, that no one had fpoke fo plain of the Refurrec~tion fince Chrift, as Job had before Chrift ** : And if we compare this with Gen. xlix. 18. it will agree exactly with Jacob's Expreflion, / have waited for thy Salvation, O Lord ; and with that weighty Truth of the Re- furreclidn, our Saviour tells us of, Johnv.2%. "The * Hfer. Ep. Crff. ad Evang. Pr. col. 571. t Ch. %7, $. ch. 26. 13. ch. $3. 4. |j Aug. C. D. 1. 18. c. 47. Chryfaft. horn. 4. de patient. Job. cSVfSpanheim'jdifTertat. de Job. Edit. Lugd. Bar. 1703. Tom. a. * * Hieron. Praef. m Job. hour Chap. p. Chrift as God. \ 3 5 hour is coming, in which all that are in the Graves Jball hear his Voice,- and Jh all come forth, they that have done good unto the RefurreBion of Life, and they that have done Evil unto the RefurreBion of Damnation. I mud further obferve, that he calls his Saviour by the Name of GW, which fignifies fuch a Saviour as has paid a m'7^ a Price of Redemption ; but of this more hereafter. Job in a word affirms that his Redeemer liveth, and that he himfelf /hall rife again \ which is equi- valent to that in the Gofpel, that Chrifi is the Re- furreBion and the Life ; St. John could fay no more : It is his Hope, he is regenerate by it to a lively Hope, St. Peter could fay no more : he enters into fuch particulars, as this Flefi, and thefe Eyes, which is as much as was, or could be faid by St. Paul him- felf. So that it is plain to a Demonftration that Job believ'd and worfhip'd Chrift as God. The JewiJJj Church in the Wildernefs worfiifd Chrifi as Qod. I come now to the Jews as a People under a Go- vernment, having a Religion given to them by God himfelf, and as being God's Pecuhum, his Church in the Wildernefs. And that this Jewifh Church in the Wildernefs worfhip'd Chrift as their God, will appear when I fhall have fhown you, Firft, That Chrift was the God of the Covenant with the Jews. Secondly, That Chrift dwelt in the Tabernacle, as God and King of the Jewifh Church. Thirdly, That Chrift was the Guardian' God of Ifrael in the Wildernefs. And, Fourthly, That they worfhip'd and ador'd Chrift as their God. And, K 4 Fifthly, 1 3 6 The Jews worjbip'd Chap, p; J}/*&k That Chrifl Jefus was the true High- prieft of that Church. Fir ft, C/;n/Z uyzj */? 24. The Lord our God has /hewed us his Glory, and we have heard his Voice ; we have feen this Day that God doth talk with Man. Whence it is mod evi- dent, that this Angel who delivered the Law, was the Son of God, the fecond Perfon in the Trinity, whofe various Appearances under the Old Tefta- rnent were fo many Tokens and Efiays of his In- carnation. It is a remarkable Text, Exod'Xxiiu 20, 21. Be- hold I fend an Angel before thee to keep thee in the way, and to bring thee into the place which I have prepared. Beware of him and obey his Voice \ provoke him not ; for be will not pardon your Tranfgreffions, for my Name is in him. St. Auftin urges this Text againft Jews and Gentiles, in thefe Words : " Let them diligently " fearch and examine the Scriptures, and fee if they . 1. c. 64. themfelves 1 3 8 The Jews worfhip'd Chap. p # themfelves underftood this for the Son of God : And when we read, Exod. xxiv. 10. that the El- ders faw the God of Ifrael> we muft remember, that the invisible Father never exhibited himfelf to human View, and that Chrift was therefore that Mamre, that Word, which had all along appeared as the God of the Covenant. Let me add only here, that Mofes Gerund * has thefe Words relating to this Angel, " To fpeak " the Truth, that Angel is the Angel Redeemer, The learned Jacobus Alting tells us, from an an- tient Jewifh Catechifm f, The Hebrew Mafters fay, that in the giving of the Law more than one divine Perfon was concern'd, for that in God is I, You, and He, which are three Names of three Perfons ; all which are invoked on the Feaft of Ta- bernacles, I, Thou, and He, O help us we be- feech thee : And that to the End of the fecond Commandment the Words run in the firft Perfon, and in the third and fourth, in the third Perfon • * Cited by Maflu?, on Jofhua V. | Alting ad Deur. v. 6. from Chap. 9. Chrift as God. \ 39 from whence they argue, that the mod high Spirit fpake the two firft Commandments, but the reft were uttered by his Glory, which is the El Shad- dai, the Lord God Almighty ; who was known to the Fathers, by whom the Prophets fpake, who is called Jab, the Lord in whom the Name of God is ; who is the Beloved of God, who dwells in the Temple,* who is the Mouth of the Lord, the Face of the Lord, and the Rock, and that Goodnefs which Mofes faw when he could not fee God. And this they aflert, becaufe they fay that in God there are three Spirits united together ■ the loweft of thefe is the Holy Ghou% the fecond is the intermediate, and is called Wisdom and Under- standing ; and this is that Spirit which goeth forth with Water and Fire from the Middle of the mod confummate Glory. The Supreme Spirit is absolutely infilence; and in -him all the holy Spi- rits, and in him all the lucid Perfons confift. Secondly, Chrift dwelt in the Tabernacle, as God and King of the Jewijh Church. The Perfon that had thus entered into Covenant with the Jews, commanded Mofes, his prime Mi- nuter of State, to build him a Tabernacle, Exod. xxv. 8. Let them make me a Saifluary, that I may dwell among them : And Chap. xxix. 45, 46. And I will dwell among ft the Children of Ifrael, and will be their God, and they fiall know that I am the Lord their God, that brought them forth out of the Land of Egypt, that I may dwell among them : I am the Lord their God. And when the Tabernacle was finifhed, the fame Lord entered it, with a Glory and Grandure becoming the eternal Majefty of the Son of' God, the Lord of Glory. For fo we read, Exod. xl. 54, 3 5 . Then a Cloud covered the Tent of the Congregation^ and the Glory of the Lord filed the Tabernacle. And Mofes t 4o The Jews worjhip'd Chap. p. Mo fes was net able to enter into the Tent of the Congre- gation, becaufe the Cloud abode thereon ; and the Glory of the Lord filled the Tabernacle. For the cloudy Pil- lar which defcended, and had hitherto flood be- fore the Door of Mofes's Tent *, removed now from thence, and came hither ; not Handing at the Door of it, in form of a Pillar, but fpreading it felf ail over the Tabernacle, fo that it was covered with it, Numb. ix. 1$. and rilled it within all over, at the firft Confecration. After this great Day, the Glory of the Lord, the Schecinah, retired into the mod; holy Place, within the Veil, and refided there over the Ark of the Teftimony f.* Before I proceed I muft here obferve, That the Schecinah, the Glory of the Lord, did not only fig- nify a Symbol or Token of the divine Prefence, by a Light or Cloud, or other Glory, but that it fig- nified a divine Perfon. And Rittangel fays, That the antient Jews believed the Schecinah not to be the divine Glory, but a divine Perfon ; and that the Chaldee Paraphraft has frequently rendered it for a Perfon : And he produces ten Places in evi- dence, and leaves, he fays, many more to the Rea- der's Obfervation ||. If the Glory of the Lord therefore be a divine Perfon, and we c. 117. People : Chap. 9. Chrift as God. 141 People : Which are the very Words of God, Lev. xxvi. 12. and therefore prove Chrift to be that ve- ry God that dwelt among them. And St. John al- ludes to this, when he fays, 'The Word was made Flejhy and dwelt among us, and tabernacled among us, John i. 14. Further, that Chrift prefided in the Jewifli Church, as their God and King, is evident from thefe Texts compared together. Ifa. Ix. 1. Arife, fhine, Eph. v. 14. Wlienfore jor thy Light is come ; and he faith [the Prophet 7- the Glory of the Lord is ri- faiali] Awake thou that fen upon thee. fleepeft, and arife from the dead, and Chrift fi all give thee Light. Now if the Lord Jehova be not Chrift, the Pro- phet is fo far from faying that Chrift fhall give thee Light, that he makes no mention at all of him ; and yet St. Paul affirms, that it is Chrift who gives Light: And therefore that Expreffion, The Glory of the Lord is rifen upon thee^ is the fame with Chrift fiattgive thee Light ; and Chrift is that Lord Jehova, becaufe they are not two diftinft Perfons, but one and the fame here fpoken of. So again, God calls himfelf the King of Ifrael ; and who that King of Ifrael is, will appear from the Defcription that King gives of himfelf. Ifa. xliv. 6. Thus faith Rev. i. 11. I am Alpha the Lord the King of "Ifrael, and Omega, the firft and and his Redeemer the Lord the laft. of Hofts, I am the firft and the laft, and hefides me there is no other God, Now I 1 42 The Jews worjkip'd Chap. 9. Now there cannot be more than One who is the firft and the laft, and God that calls himfelf fo, calls himfelf the Redeemer, and the King of Ifrael, and Chrift is that firft and laft ; it follows therefore that he is the God, and King, and Redeemer of Ifrael. Again, the fame King of Ifrael is defcribed by the Prophet Zachary in a State of Humiliation, as he was by lfaiah in Glory before. Zech. ix. 9. Rejoice Mat.xxi.4. AH this was greatly, Daughter o/'Zi- done, that it might be fut- on, fiout Daughter of filled which was fpoken by Jerufalem, behold thy King the Prophet, faying, Tell the comphunto thee, he is juft, Daughter of Sion, Behold and having Salvation, low- thy King comet h unto thee ly, and riding upon an Afs, meek, and fitting upon an and upon a Colt the Fole of Afs, and a Colt the Fole of tin Afs. an Afs. Now from comparing thefe two Texts together it appears, that the Jewifli Church had a King, and that Chrift was he : And thereupon the Prophet Malachi calls the Temple, which was the Palace of the divine King of Ifrael, the Temple of Chrift; Chap.iii. 1. Behold I will fend my Meffenger, and he fh aU prepare my Way before me ; and the Lord whom ye Jeek jhallfuddenly come to His Temple, even the Angel of the Covenant whom ye delight in ; behold he flmllcome, faith the Lord of Hofts, It appears therefore, that Chrift is the King of Ifrael, the Lord of Hofts, and that God, befides whom there is no other God. Thirdly, Chrift was the Guardian God of Ifrael in the IVildernefs. We have a very particular Account of this, Exod. xxxiii. for Chap, xxxii. we find, that the Ifraelites having Chap. 9. Ghrijl as God. 145 having fallen into the Sin of Idolatry, God plagued the People, ver. 35. And we find, Cbap.xxxiii. 2, 3. that God refufed to go any longer with them, but would leave them to the Superintendency of an An- sel. Upon this melancholy News the People mourn- ed, ver. 4, 5, 6. Ver. 7. we find God removed his Prefence without the Camp : Upon this Mofes hum- bly interceded with God not to forfake them, ver. 12, 1%. and God was intreated, ver. 14. My Preface (hall 20 -with thee. Mofes rejoiced at this, and further begs that God will be pleas'd to perform that gra- cious Promife, ver. 1 5, 16. If thy Prefence go not with me, carry us not up hence: And God, ver. 17. allures Mofes that he had heard him, / will do this Thing alfo that thou haft fpoken, for thou haft found Grace in my Sight, and I know thee by Name. Upon the whole therefore we find, that it was God that conduded Ifraelin the Wildernefs, that God withdrew himfelf for the Sin of the golden Calf, that God threatned to leave them, that God promifed to fend an Angel, that Mofes prays that God would not give an Angel the Cuftody of the People, but that he himfelf would conduft them in Perfon. God ftill aflures him that an Angel fhali accompany him ,• Mofes importunately prefles it, that himfelf would go with them. Seeing then Mofes declar'd himfelf fo averfe to the Superintendency of an Angel, and he that now and all along communed with him, was the Perfon that confented atlaft^to go with the Hoft, and govern them himfelf, 'tis plain that he muft be God, the only begotten God, who called himfelf / am, and who fhow'd himfelt afterward to Mofes, as the Lord, the Lord God, Chap. xxxiv. 6. and to whom Mofes prayed for Pardon, and ftill interceded for his Prefence, ver. 9. And this we find further mod exprefs in the Hif- tory of Balaam, Numb, xxii. where we find that he J 3 went 1 44 The J e the King of Ifrael, the God that brought them out of Egypt, Chap, xxiii. 21, 22. which are the very words us'd by God himfelf, / am Jehova thy God that brought thee out of the Land of Egypt, and that God is Chrift. Fourthly, 'The JewiJJ) Church worjhip'd Chrift as God. I have fhown before that Chrift was the God of the Covenant with the Jews ; I have fhown that Chrift dwelt in the Tabernacle as God, and King of the Jewifh Church; I have fhown that Chrift was the Guardian God of Ifrael in the Wildernefs; and am now to fhow that they worfhip'd this Chrift as Chap. 9 . Chrifl as God. i 4 5 as God. And if I had not one word more to fay on this Head, the very Premifes would produce this Confequence, that they worihip'd the God of the Covenant, that they ador'd that God to whom they had built a Tabernacle, a moveable Temple, and that by his own Command ; and that they worihip'd their God, their Guardian and Defender, with the mod foiemn Worlhip and Adoration. I fay, it is natural co believe they worihip'd their God that had done fo great things for them, and had made them his Peculium, his own People, according to that which God faid, Ifaiah xliif* 21. 'This People have I formed for my felf they [ball Jhew forth my Praife- Eut however, St. Paul tells us that Chrifl: was the divine Perfon that was all along with the Jews in the Wildernefs, and was both worihip'd by them, and provoked by them too,- for in the ioth Chap- ter of the 1 ft Epiftle to the Corinthians, he declares feveral parts of the divine Difpenfation, as the Cloud, the Palfage thro' the Sea, Manna, and the Water from the Rock, which he fays were all tranf- a&ed by Jefus Chrifl: ; for at ver. 4. he fays ex- prefly, and that Rock was Chrift ; Chrifl was the fupreme Agent, Chrift preferved them by the Cloud, Chrift baptiz'd them in the Sea, Chrift fed them with Manna, Chrift gave them Drink from the Rock, the Figure and Emblem of himfeif, of whofi fulnefs we all receive Grace after Grace. After that the Apoftle relates the Sins of the Jews againftthat very Chrift their God, they com- mitted Idolatry, they murmui'd, they committed Fornication, and they tempted Chrift, ver. 9. they Jufted,and received the Reward of t re fpa fling ^gainft Mercy; as they therefore finned againft him by Idolatry, by murmuring, and by Luft, fo it appears that others who joined not with them in their Sins, did worihip Chrift as their God ; and L the \^6 The Jews worjbip'd Chap.p, the Apoftle warns us, from the Punifliment of thofe Sinners, to worfhip that God, that Saviour, that Jefus in Sincerity, that we perifli not as they did that finned againft him : from v, hich Argumen- tation it is plain, that Chrift was the God wor- fhip'd by the Jews in the Wildernefs. In a word, Chrift was the End of the Law, Rom. x. 4. Chrift was the Body of the Ceremonial Shadows, Col. ii. 17. Chrift was the Centre of the Prophets, Acls x. 43. and Chrift is the Key of Knowledge, Luke xi. 52. Chrift is all the very Spirit and Soul of the Old Teftament. Fifthly, Chrift Jefus the true High-Prieft prefigured by Aaron. As Jefus Chrift was the God and King of the Jews, and dwelt in the Tabernacle, and was worfliipM as God by the Jews, fo he was alfo pre- figured as the QUvQsovot, God and Man, in Aaron the High-Prieft. So Philo the Jew * fays, that the High-Prieft was the Type or Figure of the only begotten Son of Godj who is the eternal High Prieft of the vaft Temple of the Univerfe, as he is the Maker there- off. And when he fpeaks of his Veftments, which he fays reprefented the Fabrick of Heaven and Earth, he fays particularly, that the four Letters on the front of Aaron s Mitre, anfwered to the eternal Being of God, and calls it ovo^a. r* oflos ; and fays, that by it was underftood Jebova Filius^ God the Son. * Philo. de Somniis. Ai/o ydt<> hg£ 0*S, \v y&v q£$ K'otrpO? tp 6) X) ttfY/€f£U$ r w%u\bywo<; ctvjv, Qhos hoy&. f Ibid, a byo$ «/V irtv mkvv 8t« «Ti « ^u'/^/w; jtoV/a©- \£vim~ 3 Na y* Chap. 9. Chrifl as God. \ 47 Nay, Aaron m his Prieftly Ornaments reprefented both the divine and human Nature of Chrift : for the Riches of thofe Veftraents could fignify no Clothing, but that of God ; and his Perfon as a Man reprefented the Antitype as fuch alfo. And becaufe he was to fuftaifl the Perfon of him that was truly God y fome Privileges were put up- on him, which fuppofed him in a manner elevated above the Nature of Man*,- whereupon Philo breaks out inthefe words f : et oova ml x^^®" h*yy ^ a?W? # L 2 the 1 48 The Jews worfhipd Chap. 9. the Platform thereof, who thorowly underftands the Neceflities thereof, and has a perfect Know- ledge of the Frailties and Miferies of his Creatures ? For it is neceffary, fays Philo, for him that would fupplicate the Father cf the World *, to make ufe of the Son, the Paraclete, the mod confummate in Goodnefs (or in other words, the mod: compani- onate Interceflbr) for the Forgivenefs of Sins, and the fupplies of the moft defirable Felicitys. And this is very agreeable to what the Prophet Zechariah and the Apoftle St. Paul fay concerning Chrift ; for the Prophet fays, Behold the Man whofe Name is the Branch, he Jhall build the 'Temple of the Lord, and he Jhall bear the Glory, and Jhall Jit and rule upon his Throne ; and he Jhall be a Prieft upon his Throne, and the Counfel of Peace Jhall be between them both y Chap. vi. 13. And St. Paul fays of Chrift, Heb. v. 5« Cbrifi glorified not himfelfto be made an High- Prieft, but he that faid unto him, thou art my Son, this day have I begotten thee. And, Chap. vii. 26, 27.. For fuck an High' Prieft became us, zvho is holy, harmlefs, undefiled, feparate from Sinners, and made higher than the Heavens, ivho needeth not daily as thofe High-Priejls to offer up Sacrifice fir ft for his own Sins, and then fir the Peoples : fir this he did once when he offered up himfelf But this Man is able to fave them to the utter m ft that come unto God by him, feeing he ever liveth to make Intenejfton fcr them, Ver. 25. Jofliua worjhip'd Chi ft as God- That Jcjhua the Succeffor of Mjes, and the Type of the Meflias, worrtiip'd Chrift as God, is very plain from Jojbua v. 14. where we find thefe words ; Vita Mofis* $ And Chap. ?. Chrijl as God. 1 49 And he faid, As Captain of the HjJI of the Lord am I now come ; and Jofhua jell on his Face to the Earth, and did worjhip, and f aid unto him, What faith my Lord unto his Servant ? And the Captain of the Lord's Hofl faidunto Jofliua, Loofe thy five from off thy FuQt, for the Place whereon thou flandeft is holy. Now we find, Exod. Hi. 4, y- that the Perfon who commanded Mofes the fame Excalceation, is there call'd boch Lord, (Jehova) and God; and by parity of Reafon, this Captain is that fame Lord, for as our marginal Notes en this place fay*, in that Jojhua worfliippeth him, he acknow- ledge him to be God ,• and in that he calls himfeif the Lord's Captain, he declares himfeif to be Chrift. For had tiiis Captain been a created An- gel, he would mod certainly not have ailow'd Jq/hua to worfhip him ; and had Jofhua not known him to be the eternal God, neither would he have done it. Chrifl the God of Ifrael in Canaan. Mofes had the Promife that the Angel fhould go before the People, to bring them into the pla C e which God had prepar'd, Exod. xxiii. 21. This Angel was therefore the Guardian God 0$ Ifrael in the Wildernefs, and we have feen before that that God was Chrift. Now we find the fame Angel, the God of Ifrael in Canaan; for we read in the 2d Chapter of Judges, when the Jews were in the promis'd Land, and had tranfgrefs'd the divine Command, that the fame Angel appeared to them, and rebuked them at Bochim: and he declares himfeif to be that fame Angel that brought them from Egypt, and that An- gel was God, for he fpeaks thus, Judges ii. 1. / * Bible printed at London, Anno 1599. h Chrift. Barker. L 3 made 1 5 o The Jews wor/hip'd Chap. 9. made you to go up out of Egypt, and have brought you into the Land which I fware unto your Fathers, and I will never break my Covenant with you \ which none but cne Almighty God could fay : and after he had rebuked them for their Sin, and declar'd the Penalty, Ver, 3. we find how the People were af- f'ecled with it; for Ver. 4. it is faid, When the Angel of the Lord [pake thefe words unto all the Chil- dren cf Ifrael, that the People lift up their Voice and wept : and Ver. 5. And they called the name of that place Rochim, [that is Weepers] and they facrificed thereunto the Lord, that Angel, that Chrifl: againft whom they had finned. Gideon worjhip'd Chrifl as God. That Gideon worfhiVd Chrifl as God, is fo plain, that any one that reads Judges the 6th muft be- lieve it, or mud believe that Gideon was an Ido- later ; for at Ver. 12. we find that the Angel cf the Lord appear 'd unto him* and {aid unto him y "The Lord is with thee, thou mighty Man of Valour : and it appears Ver* 13. that Gideon thought it was a created An- gel ; but Ver. 14. the Lord, the Jehova, looked upon him. convine'd him that he was not a created Angel, and commifTion'd him to be a Judge and a Deliverer of Ifrael. Here we have (till the fame Perfon fpeaking firft as an Angel, now as the Jthova, and alluring him of his Prefence, / will be withjou, in the fame rrunner as he had done to the Patriarchs before ; and when Gideon had ask'd for a Token of his Prefence, and the Angel had wrought a Miracle, and was departed from him, Gideon faid, Alas, Lord God! which was not an Exclamation thro' fear or furprize, but was a recognition of his Divinity, ajncj an act of Ado- ration paid to the divine Majefly. Chap. 9. Chrijl as God. 1 5 1 I do freely acknowledge that Men have always exprefs'd a very terrible Apprehenfion of prefent Death, upon the appearance of God. Mfes was afraid^ Exod. iii. 6. the Ifraelaes pray'd that God would not fpeak to them, left vie die, Exod. xx. ip. And Manoah faid to his Wife, vie Jhall furely die be- caufe vie have feen God, Judg. xiii. 22. Nay, and Efaias himfelf, Wo is me, for I am undone [or cut oft] for mine Eyes have feen the King the Lord of Hofts. And if Gideon exprefs'd the fame fear, it muft be^ becaufe he had feen God, and not at the fight of an Angel ; fo i( it be allow 'd that his Exclamation, Alas, O Lord God ! proceeded from Fear, from Surprize, and apptehenfion of prefent Death, it muft be allow'd at the fame time, that that An- gel was the very God ; and this apprehenfion of Death was fo ftrong, that God appear'd again to remove it, Ver. 23. the very Jehova ; fur the Lord faid unto him, Peace be unto thee, fear not, thou Jh alt not die : which is a Confirmation both that his Fear was juft, and that the Angel whom he had feen was the Jehova , the very God. And then Gideon built an Altar there unto the Lord, that very Lord who had appear'd to him as an Angel, and had commiflion'd him to be a Judge of Ifrael, and had promis'd to be with him ; he built the Altar to him, and call'd it Jehova Shalom-, the Lord fend Peace; and this is certainly the highefh Act of divine Wor- ship that a Creature can pay to God : and that Gideon paid this to Chrift is evident, not only be- caufe that Angel- Jehova was the very Chrift, but becaufe St. Paul numbers him among the Heroes that believ'd in Chrift, and worfhip'd him as the only true God, Heb-xi $2. h 4 Manoah i 5 2 The Jews worjhip'd Chap. 9. Manoah worfhifd Chrift as God. That Manoah worfhip'd the Son of God, is evi- dent from Judges xiii. where we find an Angel appeared, firft to his Wife ; and upon Manoah's Prayer, Ver. 8, 9. the Angel return'd again to the IViman, and Manoah then went and communed with him, thinking all this while that he had been a created Angel, til] he ask'd after his Name : and that he then believ'd he was God is apparent, be- caufe he' promis'd to do him Honour ,• and he was confirm'd in tin's Opinion when the Angel refused to tell him his Name, faying it was a Secret, or rather, as in the Margin, becaufe it was Wonder- ful, Ver. 18. And upon that Manoah offer'd a Sa- crifice, the Angel {landing by who approv'd of if, doing wondroufty ; which is generally interpreted that this Angel Jehova fent Fire from Heaven to con- fume the Sacrifice, to confirm their Faith in his Promife : and in the Flame the Angel afcended, and then Manoah knew that he was an Angel of the Lord, Ver. 21. which may alfo be thus rendred, then Manoah knew that he was the Angel Jehova. And that this is the right Conftru&ion, appears from Ver. 22. where they exprefs'd their dread, we {hall fur ely die becaufe we have fen God. From the whole it appears that Manoah worlhip'd God, that that God was that Angel, and that that Angel was Chrift; and fo the Notes on this place, Ver. 11. explain it, he calls him Man becaufe he fo feemed, but he was Chrift the eternal Word *. 'The Prophets worfhip'd Chrift as God. Our bleflfed Saviour tells us, that the things re- lating to himfelf, were wrote in Mofes, in the Pra- * Notes on the Bible, Anno i$99« London, by Barker. phets, Chap. 9. Chriji as God. 1 5 3 phets, and in the Pfalms, Luke xxiv. 44. And St. Peter fays, that the Spirit of Chrift was in the Prophets* -who teftified beforehand the Sufferings of Chrift, and the Glory that Jhould follow, 1 Pet. Lir. Now can ic poffiblv be conceived, that thefe Prophets fhou Id by the Inspiration of the holy Spirit of God, fpeak of all the particulars of the Life and Death, of the Refurrcftion and Afcenfion of Chrift into Heaven, and declare thefe things to the Jews, as the Rea- fon of their Hope, and not at the fame time them- felves believe in him? Should they who believ'd the Promife of God, of the Seed of the Woman, that firft Gofpel given to Adam, inlarg'd to Abra- ham, and typified by Mofes's Law, be ignorant of that Saviour whom the Jews look'd for, and trufted in ? And at the fame time give and deliver par- ticular Revelations concerning him to the Jews, that after Ages might know the Mefnas by thofe very Particulars which they related of him, andac the fame time not believe in him themfelves ; this I fay is inconceivable ! It has indeed been queftion'd by fome Men of Learning, whether the Prophets had a diftinct Knowledge of every particular they foretold con- cerning theMefTias; and who can determine it ? who dares afTert it? But that they knew and be- liev'd the chief, the principal things relating to the Meflias, this I am very fure of, this I dare boldly to aflert, and this I will prove. They knew the Meflias to be the Son of God, and the Saviour of the World ; they knew he would appear in the Flefli : They knew he would fuffer, and that for the Sins of Mankind ; they knew he was to die ; they knew he would rife again from the dead ; they knew that he by virtue of his Death would overcome the Powers of Death, and the Grave ; they knew that he would afcend into Heaven, and fit at the right Hand of God j they knew that his Gofpel i 5 4 Fhe Jews worjhip'd Chap. p. Gofpel would be preach'd over all the World, that Idolatry would fall before him, and he alone fhould be ador'd as the Lord God Almighty, the God of Heaven, and the Saviour of Men. They knew that he the Meflias would judge the quick and the dead, and that his Kingdom would be an everlafting Kingdom. Now thefe are the principal Articles of the Chrift ian Religion ; and if I can prove that the Frcphets knew and believ'd them, as I am very fure I can, then we may fay with the Antients, that the Jewifh Church was the Chriftiau in Promife *, and the Chriftian the Jewifh Church accomplifh'd : and upon this the 7th Article of the Church of England is grounded, which fays, " The Old " Teftament is not contrary to the New; for < cf£ t^V TW i7m.yyL\ia,v ^ cLvrlfbaiv & quid eft aliud quod dicitur Novum nifi Veteris revela- tio ? Aug. CD. !. id. C.Z6, that Chap, 9. Chrift as God. 155 that fpiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Chrift, 1 Cor.x. i, 2, 3, 4. Chrift led them ail the forty Years in the Wildernefs ,• Chrift was their God, their King and Governor ; Chrift was all in ail to them : And yet for them not to know, nor wor/hip him, who was their Jehova, their Goel, their Shilo, their Emanuel, their MeJJias, is a Propo- rtion as ftrange as it is falfe \ fo ftrange, that none but fuch as are deluded by that Spirit of Error which poffefled Socinus, could have thought fo. Give me leave to lay open their Errors a little. The Racovian Catechifm has fpoke openly, and asks this Queftion, Were not the fame Promifes that are made to us, made by the Law of Mofes ? The Anfwer is *, No, not any of them ; for neither e- ternal Life, nor the Holy Ghoft was promifed to the obedient by Mofes's Law.. And that we might know he underftood the whole Mofaical Difpenfa- tion, he fays, in the Anfwer to the 7th Queftion, That God has referv'd the Promife of eternal Life to the Days of the New Teftament. And Queftion 6. he fays, That fuppofing any of the Antients were faved, they were faved not by virtue of any of God's Promifes, but of his abundant Goodnefs, who gave them more than ever he promis'd them. And Smalcius ] doubts not to fay, It is an old Wife's Fable, to believe that any of the Fathers of the Old Teftament were faved by Faith in Chrift as Mediator. And the Racovian Catechifm fays, Tho none be faved but by Faith, that pertains only to * Rac. Cat. c. <>.de promijf. vit. &t. 6\ 3. At non eadem pro- mifla fuere in lege Mofis ? R. Immo nullum eorum comprehenfum fuir 5 etenim nufquam in lege Mofis reperies vel vitam asternam, aut donuiii Spirirus San&i obedientibus praeceptis legis promifium. f Smalcius, c. 4. de bon, oper. Juftificatum autem effe aliquem in veteri teftamento fide in mediatorem Cbriftum, anilis eft fa- bula. the 156 The Jews worfhip'd Chap. 9. the Difpenfation of the Gofpel *. To repeat fuch Errors only is to refute them ; but the Falfenefs has already appeared, and will further appear in the following Pages. David worfhifd Chrift as God, That David knew and worfhip'd Chrift as God, I think is as plain as the Light of the Sun. That he knew God to be Triunal, is what feve- ral of the Chriftian Writers have aflerted t >* and that from his Words, Pfal. xxxiii. 6. By the Word cf the Lord were the Heavens made, and all the Heft of them by the Breath of his Mouth. And, indeed, if he did not mean the three Perfons of the Divinity, it is difficult to find out what he could mean. But however, he knew and worfhip'd the Son of God, Pfal. xlv. 6. Thy Throne, O God% is for ever and ever, the Sceptre of thy Kingdom is a right Sceptre ; t/jou hveft Righteoufnefs , and hate ft Wickednefs ; therefore God, thy Gody hath anointed thee with the Oil of Gladnefs above thy Fellows : i. e. God has made thee both Lord and Chrift. And that this was fpoke of Chrift, we have St. Paul's Authority, Heb. i. 8. and the Chaldee Paraphraft, which perhaps may be of greater Au- thority with our Adverfaries. Again, the fame Pfalmift fays, Pfal. ex. i. The Lord f aid unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right Hand, un- til I make thine Enemies thy Footftool, And this Text our Saviour himfelf produces as a Proof oF his Di- vinity, and of David's knowing him to be God ; * Rac. Cat. c. u. 6^ $. Ergone fine fide in Chriftum nemo juftificatur ? R. Nemo prorfus. Verum id de eo tempore intelligendum eft, quo Chriftus patefa&us eft, 8cc. f See a Urge Catalogue of Fathers, by Dr. Wateiland, Serm. z, p. 7 u and Chap* 9. Chrifi as God. \ 5 7 and being a matter of Import, is recorded by three Evangelifts * : And the Apoftles alfo have made ufe of this Text, as a Teftimony of Chrifl's Divi- nity, and his Afcenfion into Heaven, AEis 11. 34. Nay, and fome of the moft learned Jews acknow- ledge that this Pfalm is fpoke of the Meffias * David not only worfhip'd Chrifi: as God himfelf, but called upon all true Ifraelites to join with him in the Adoration, Pfal. ii. 7- 1 ™M declare the Decree, the Lord has Jaid unto me, Thou art my Son, this Day have I begotten thee: And at vet. 8. he fpeaks of the Glory of his Kingdom, and talks of his Power, and declares that he will be honour'd by all the Kings and Princes of the Earth ; and thereupon he fays, Wl 12. Kifs ye the Son, left he be angry. The Ado- ration is not only requir'd, but the Reafons and Motives are added : The Reafon, becaufe he is the Son ; and St. Paul, Heb. i. proves, that he is the eternal Son of the eternal God : And David, ver. 11. had called him the Jehova, Serve the Lord with Fear, and rejoice with trembling. And then he adds the Motives ; firft, from the Penalty, Left ye perijh ; and next from the Benefit of his Service, Bleffed are all they that put their Truft in him. And that divine Worfhip and religious Adoration is (ignified by kifs, will appear when I fhall have fhewn you, how a Kifs was ufed as an Aft of di- vine Worfhip, and Part of folemn Adoration, by almoft all the Nations of the World. Of a Kiss in religious Worfhip. That by the Word Kifs is underftood an Aft of divine Adoration, including; all the Afts of Worfhip, of Honour, Prayer, Thank fgiving, and Service, will * Mat.xxii. 44. Mark xii. 36. Luke xx. 42. •J- Rabbi Saadia, cited by Grotius, Rcl. Ch. 1. 5, § 12. N° 1. appear 1 5 8 The Jews worfhip' d Chap. 9. appear from that general Ufe of that outward Ac- tion, to declare all inward Veneration, and exprefs all Obedience. So we find it, i Kings xix. 18. Tet have I left me /even thousand in Ifrael ; all the Knees which have not bowed unto Baal, and every Mouth which has not kijfed him. So, Hofea xiii. 2. And now they fin more and more , and have made them molten Images—- and they fay of them, Let the Men that facrifice kifs the Calves. Job tells us of the Idolaters that worfhip'd the Sun and Moon, that becaufe they could not reach them, they lifted up their Hands to them. They luffed their Hands in demonfiration of the mofl: folemn Worfhip, and then held their Hands up to them, as it were to throw that Kifs to them, which they w r ou!d give them were they in their reach : So he fays, Chap- xxxi. 2<5. If I beheld the Sun when it fiineth-, or the Moon walking in Brightnefs y and my Heart has been fecretly enticed, or my Mouth has kijfed my Hand. And that Job underftood by that Kiffing of the Hand, the mofl folemn Act of divine Adoration, and religious Worfhip, is evident from ver. 28. where he fays it is open Idolatry, T'his alfo were an Iniquity to be punijhed by the Judge, for IJhould have denied the God that is above. And the Word Adoration, which we ufe for the higheft A<5r. of divine Worfhip, fignifies to put the Hand to the Mouth, and is derived from that reli- gious Cuftom. Pliny fays, that in worfhipping we put the right Hand to the Mouth *: And Apuleius .defcribes the manner of it among the Romans]; "* Plin. I. zo. c. 2. In adorando dextram acl ofculum refe- rimus. •j- Apul. I 4- dfin* Aur. Et admoventes oribus fuis dextram, priori digito in ere&um pollicem refidente, ut ipfam prorfus de- arn Venerem religion's adorationibus venerabantur. and Chap. 9. Chrijl as God. \ 59 and Lucian * among the Indians : Demofthenes f for the Greeks, when the Idol or Deity was out of their reach, for otherwife they killed the very Idol : For Cicero tells us of a brazen Statue of Hercules? whofe Jaws and Chin were wore away by the Wor- shippers that kitfed it, becaufe they were wont not only to pray to it, but to kifs it alfo |j. But to return to David- That he knew the Son of God would become Flefh, and appear in human Nature, is certain from PfaL xl. 6. And that that Pfalm does pertain to Chrift, and fpeak of his In- carnation for our Redemption, St. Paul affures us, who is certainly the bed Interpreter, whofe Words W ; e find, Heb. x. 5. Wherefore when he cometh into the World he faith, Sacrifice and Burnt-Offering thou would eft not, but a Body haft thou prepared me : In Burnt Offer- ings and Sacrifices for Sin thou haft had no Pleafure : Then J aid I, Lo y I come [in the Volume of thy Book it is written of me] to do thy Will, God. Above when he faid, Sacrifice, and Offerings? and Burnt- Offerings, and Offering for Sin thou wouldeft not, neither had ft Pleafure therein (which are offered by the Law) then faid he, Lo, I come to do thy Will, God. He taketh away the fir ft, that he may eftablijh the fecond. By the which Will we are fanBified? thro the Offering of the Body of Jefus Chrift once for all. This is very exprefs ; and that God can aflumean human Body, is not only agree- able to his Almighty Power, and not contrary to our Reafon to believe, but is acknowledged not * Lucian. 1. i^sf/ o^wagft^, When they arife in the Morning they worjhip the Sun, tMV %«?<* KV wo is me, for I am undone, becaufe I am a Man of uu" clean Lips for mine Eyes have feen the King, the Lord of Hefts. ' Now who this Lord of Hods was, whom Ifaiah faw, St. John tells us cfa xii. 41. namely Chrifb • for fo the Evangelift fays, For thefe things faid Ifaiah, when he faw his Glory , and f pake of him* And what St. John quotes from the Prophet of the 'judicial Hardnefs that fhould befal the Jews, is taken from ver. 9, 10. of that Chapter of Ifaiah. And if we compare this Text with Rev. iv. 8. we find this fame Glory given to God the Father : M 4 whence 1 6 8 The Jews wor/Iotpd Chap. $. whence it neceflarily follows, that Chrift is of the fame Nature, Honour, and Glory, with the Fa- ther, the fame Lord of Hofls, the fame eternal God ; or we muft believe that Ijaiah and the E- vangelift have robb'd the Father of his Honour, and given it to another, to whom it was not due. And here I am further to obferve, that the Sera- fhim, by crying to each other, did not only declare the Nature of God, and recognize his Authority over all the World, but did folemnly invoke and wcrfhip him as that God, who is moil: holy, and by. whom they a-re and were created. Again, Ijaiah calls Chrifl the Emmanuel, which is the chief Name of the MeiTias, having relation to the divine and human Natures in the hypofla- rirk Union, Chrift, God and Man, Ifa.viu 14. and ch. villi 8. which was the Name given by the Angel, Matth.i .23. They JhaU call his name Emmanuel, which being interpreted, is God with us. Again, Ijaiah calls Chrift. by the name of Goe'l, the Redeemer, chap.lix. 20. And the Redeemer JhaU come to Zion* Gael, Redeemer. And here I find my felf oblig'd to explain the Word, becaufe I find there is very great ftrefs laid upon it in the holy Scriptures, and becaufe it has been obferv'd *, that this Word is us'd more than fix hundred times in the Old Teftament. for fuch a Redeemer as the New Teftament defcribes Jefus Chrifl to be. The word Httl.1, Goel, fignifies one allied or related in Biond j whence it is rendered Propinquus, a Relation: whence Chrifl, who took upon him the Seed of Abraham, is not afham'd to- call us Bre- ** Spanhem. Diflert. Jod fignifying the Father, OM,and Righteous- ness, and Sanciification , and Redemption. Acts ii.36. Therefore let all the Houfe of Ifrael know, that God has made that fame Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ. ARTICLE IV. Who was conceived by the Holy Ghost, born of the Virgin Mary. That the Meflias was to Chrift was incarnate, be incarnate. John i. 14. The Word Mai. 111. 1. The Lord was made Flejh. whom ye feek Jhall fuddenly 1 Tim. iii. 16. God was come to his Temple ; even manifeft in the Flejb. the The \y6 The Jews The Jewi/h Creed. the Meffenger of the Cove- nant whom )e delight in. I fa. xi. i. And there fi all come jorth a Rod out of the Stem p/Jefle, and a Branch Jhall grow out of his Roots , and the Spirit of the Lord jhall reft upon him. The Meffias was to be born of a Virgin. Ifa. vii. 14. Behold a Virgin fa all conceive and bear a Son, and fiall call his Name Emmanuel. wor/hipd . Chap. 9; The Chriftian Creed. Ads xiii. 23. Of this Alans Seed has God accor- ding to his Promife raffed unto Ifrael a Saviour je- fus. Jefus Chrift born of ths Virgin Mary. Luke i. 26, to 33. Mat. i. 22. Now all this zvas done, that it might be fulfilled which was fpoken by the Prophet, Behold a Vir- gin Jhall be with Child, and bring forth a Son, and they jhall call his Name Emma- nuel. Chrift was humble and meek. Mat. xxi. 1- 4. All this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was fpoken by the Prophet, faying, Tell ye the Daughter ofTLion, be- hold thy King cometh unto jhee ; meek, and fitting upon an Afs, and a Colt the Foal of an Afs. Mat. xi. 29. Learn of me, for I am meek, and low- ly in Heart* The Jewifh Matters fay, that the Meffias would be humble. If indeed the Ifraelites fhould prove worthy, and be juft and good, then he would come t in The Meffias was to be humble. Zech.ix.Q. Rejoice great- ly, Daughter of Zion, Jhout, O Daughter of Jeru- falem, behold thy King co- meth unto thee ; he is juft, and having Salvation, low- ly, and ridwg upon an Afs, and upon a Colt the Foal of an Afs. p. Chrtji as God. 177 in the Clouds of Heaven ,• but if unworthy, then poor, and riding upon an Afs *. And Rabbi Saa- diah : He that is like the Son of Man mentioned by Daniel, is the Meffias our Righteoufnefs ; and of him it is written, He fhall be poor, riding on an Afs, he (hall be humble ; but it is alfo written, he came to the Antient of Days ; that is, the Lord faid unto my Lord, fit thou on my right Hand. The Chriftian Creed. Chrift was born at Beth- lehem. Mat. ii. 1. Now Jefus was born in Bethlehem of Judea. The Jewitfi Creed. That the Meffias was to be born at Bethlehem. Micah v. 2. And thou, Bethlehem Ephrata, tho thou be little among the thou- fands of Judah,^ out of thee Jhall he come forth unto me that is to be Ruler in Ifrael, whofe Goings- forth have been from old, from everlafling. And that the antient Jews were well aflured of this, appears from their Anfwer to King Herod, in which Anfwer they appeal to this very Prophecy, Mat. ii. 1- 7. The Meffias to be wor- ihip'd by the Heathen. Ifa. lx. 6. The Multitude of Camels fhall cover thee, the Dromedaries o/Midian Chrift worfliip'd by the Magi, theWifemen. Mat. ii. 11. And when they [the Wifemen] were come into the Houfejhey faw and Ephah, all they from the young Child, with Ma Shebah jhall come: they ry his Mother, and fell down come (hall bring Gold and Incenfe^ and they Jhall Jhew forth the Praife of the Lord. and worshipped him: And when they had opened their Treafures, they prtfented to him GiftSy Gold, hid Fran- kincenfe, and Myrrh. * Lightf. Hor. Hebr. in Afr. vii. p. 77. N A R T I- 178 The Jews . 1014. Chrift the Judge of the World. John V. 22. 'The Father judgeth no Manjbut has com - mined all Judgment unto the Son. 2 Cor. v. 10. We muft all appear before the Judg- ment-feat of Chrift. A R- Chap. 9. Chrijl as God. ARTICLE IX. 185 / believe in the Holy Ghost, the Holy Catholkk Church. The Jewifh Creed. I believe in the Holy Ghoft. Ifa. lxiii. 10. The holy Spirit. Gen. i. 2. The Spirit of God. The Jews acknow- ledge this Spirit to be the Holy Ghoft*. The Holy Spirit the Lord and Giver of Life. Gen. i. 2. And the Spi- rit of God moved upon the Waters. The Holy Spirit the Guide and Comforter. Ifa. lxiii. 14. The Spirit of the Lord caufed him to reft. The Holy Spirit the In- ftru&or of the Prophets. Ifa.lxi. 1. The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, becaufe the Lord has anointed me* The Chriftian Creed. I believe in the Holy Ghoft. Matth. xxviii. 19. Go ye therefore and teach all Nations, baptising them in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and oj the Holy Ghv.fi. The Holy Spirit the Lord and Giver of Life. John vi. 63. It is the Spirit that quickeneth. ■ The Holy Spirit the Guide and Comforter. John xiv. 16. 1 will pray the Father i and hejhallgive you another Comforter- even the Spirit of Truth. The Holy Spirit the In- ftru&or of the Prophets. 1 Pet. I ii» The Spirit of Chrifi was in them [the Prophets.] Rev. xix. 10. For the Teftimony of Jefus is the Spirit of Prophecy. 2 Pet. i. 21. The holy Men of God fpake as they were moved by the Holy Ghoft. N 4 The * Dr. H, More, Cabala^ ^. 7^ 1 84 The Jews worjbifd Chap. . the Tradition of the School of Elias runs thus : Cc The Juft, whom the Holy and Bleffed (hall raife cc from the Dead, fhall not return again into the cc j) u fl b«il as the Holy God liveth to Eternity, " fo fhall they alfo live to Eternity." And the Glofs adds, " The Juft, whom God fhall raife IC from the Dead in the days of the Mefltas, when cc they live again fhall not return again to the 1C Duft, neither in the days of the Meflias nor in cc the Ages that fhall follow, but their Flefh fhall " remain, and they fhall live for ever." * ARTICLE XII. The Life Everlafling. The Jewifh Creed. The Immortality of the Soul. Eccl. xii. 7. Then Jhall the Duft return to the Earth as it was, and the Spirit (haU return to Qod that gave it. The Meflias gives eternal Salvation. Gen. xlix. 1S. 1 have waited for thy Salvation, O Lord. Pfal. xvi. 10, 11. Thou •wilt not leave my Soul in Hell, neither wilt thoufuf- fer thine Holy One to fee Corruption. Thou wiltfiew * Ughtfoot ibid. p. 9(4. me The Chriftian Creed. The Immortality of the Soul. Luke xxiii. 46. Father, into thy Hands 1 commend my Spirit. Ads vii. 59. And they floned Stephen, calling up- on God and faying, Lord Jefus receive my Spirit. Chrift gives eternal Sal- vation. Rev. xiv. 13. Blejfed are the Dead which die in the Lord. 2 Cor. v. 1. For we know that if our earthly Houfe of this Tabernacle be diffolved, we have a building of God, an Houfe not Chap. 9. Chrtfi as God. 1 89 The Jewifh Creed. The Chriftian Creed. me the Path of Life ; in not made with Hands, e- thy Prefence is Fulnefs of ternal in the Heavens. Joy, at thy Right-Hand Tit. iii. 7. Being jufti- there are Pleafures for ever- fied by his Grace ■, wejhall more. be made Heirs according to Pfal. xvii. 15. As for the hope of eternal Life, me, I will behold thy Face in Righteoufnefs : I jhatt be fatisfyd when I awake with thy Likenefs. Degrees of Glory. Degrees of Glory. Dan. xii. 3. And they John xiv. 2. In my Fa- that be wife, Jhall fiine as thers Houfe are many Man- the Brightnefs of the Fir- fans. mament \ and they that turn many to Righteoufnefs, as the Stars for ever and ever. • That the latter Jews believ'd this Article, is certain ; for their Rabbi Nathan, c. 10. fays, 4C That God fent the Angel of Death to take the " Soul of Mofes, but he could not, and that God 4C himfelf took it and treafured it up under the " Throne of Glory." ^ And prefently after, ** Nei- 44 ther is the Soul of Mofes only repofited under <4 the Throne of Glory, but the Souls of other 4C juft Men are alfo put under the Throne of " Glory." And they alfo believe that there are degrees of Glory ; for they fay there are three de- grees of Happinefs in the Life to come, the firfl in Paradife, the next under the Throne of Glory, and the higheft in Abraham's Bofom * And they diftinguifh Paradife in two Parts, the firft is the fuperior Paradife, which is the Place of Blifs, prepared for the Saints when glorify 'd in * Lightfoot Hor. Hebr. in Luce. 16. as. p. 850, Sec. Soul 1 9 o The Jews worfbiftd Chap. p. Soul and Body after the Refurre&ion ; and the other is the inferior Paradife, ufuallycall'd the Gar- den of Eden, appointed for holy Souls during the time of their Separation from their Bodies *. And they add, As there are feven degrees of juft Men that fhall fee the Face of God, and fit in the Houfe of God, and afcend on the Mount of God; fo there are feven degrees of Glory prepared for them in each Paradife f . And therefore Buxtorf tells us that the prefent Jews always pray when fick, " Lord and my God, if the time of my Death cf be come, let that Death be to me the Remif- cc (ion of all my Sins— and make me to have a cc Part in Paradffe and the World to come, which 4C is referved for the Juft ||." The Jewifh Creed. The Chriftian Creed. That there is a Hell. That there is a Hell. Dan. xii. 2. Some Jh all Matth. xxv. 41. De- arife to Shame and everlaft- part from me ye Curfed y ing Contempt. into everlafling Fire pre" fared for the Devil and his Angels. That the modern Jews believe there is a Hell, a Place of Torments, we are jfure from this Say- ing of theirs, That when the Wicked die, there are three Troops of evil Angels which cry aloud, There is no Peace to the Wicked, fays God **. And that they believe a local Hell, a Place of Tor- ments, I humbly think I have prov'd before ff. Thus have we feen the Faith of the Prophets and the Jewifh Church ; how truly does St. Paul * Huet. in Orig. com. Obferv. p. 101. ■J- Lightfoot in Luc. 23. p. 890. Hor. Hebr- l| Buxtorf. Syn. Judaic, c. 35. p, 4??. ** Lightfoot p. 850. |f See my Nemefis, p. 14,1$. fay Chap. p. Chrift as Cod. 1 p i fay that the Church of Chrift is built upon the Foun- dation of the Apoftles and Prophets^ Jefus Chrift him- felf being the chief Corner- Stone ? Eph. ii. 20. And St. Peter, Ads x. 43 . To him give all the Prophets wit- Kefs, that thro 9 his Name whofoever believeth in him jhall receive Remiffion of Sins. And as the Jewifh Church had the fame Ar- ticles of Faith, tho more obfcure, fo they had Sa- craments alfo, Signifying and fealing to them the fame Saviour Jefus Chrift, as we have, tho more darkly ,• for the Circumcifion, and the Pafcal Lamb, and the daily Sacrifices, were not only Figures, but Seals and Pledges of the Meflias to come, as Bap- tifm and the Lord's-Supper are Seals and Pledges of that fame Meffias, the Son of God, already come : but this would carry me beyond my prefent Befign. What an abominable .Affertion therefore, was that of Michael Servetus*, That the Fathers of the Old Teftament had no Knowledge or Hope of fpiritual Bleflings, nor of eternal Life, but that God did fatten them only as a Herd of Swine in the Land of Canaan, without any Profpecl: of a Life to come ? And what a detefhble Affertion is that of the Socinians, That the Jewifh Church never knew any thing of Chrift, nor ador'd the Me/Has as God ? Thefe Afferticns are deteftable, becaufe falfe, falfe in the higheft degree ,• for St. Peter fays po- sitively, Atlsxv.n. That the Jews of the Old Teftament were faved by Chrift and by his Grace, even in the felf-fame manner as we Chriftians of the New Teftament hope to be faved by him : For we believe that thro 9 the Grace of the Lord Jefus Chrift we Jhall be faved, even 'as they. And St. Paul fays, Heb. ix. 15. that Chrift is the Mediator of the * Calvin. Inftitut, 1. 2. c. 10. § 1. New i $> i The Jews wor/hipd Chap. that the Jews never in their Prayers addrefs'd God by the name of Father in the Old Teftament, from Abraham to the Macca- bees ; but that the latter Jews, feeing the.Chriftians cqme with Confidence to the Throne of Grace, and calling God Father, did make ufe of the fame Appellation, efpecially after they were reproach'd by the Chriftians, that they were not the Children of God, but Bondmen to the Law. But with the greateft Regard and Deference to thofe great Names, I humbly offer whether this Obfervation be not a Mi flake } for David certainly invok'd God by that Name in the mofi: folemn manner, 2 Chrcn* xxix. 10. David bleffed the Lord be- fore all the Congregation, and J aid , Bleffed be thou Lord God of Ifrael, our Father for ever and ever. And that Thankfgiving is part of Prayer as well as Supplication, none I prefume can deny, efpecially when they confider that the Prayers of the Jews confided chiefly of Benedictions and Doxologies ||. And that an Invocation was join'd as part of this Prayer, appears from ver. 18, iq. Lord God of Abraham keep this for ever in the Imagination of the thoughts of the Heart of thy People, and prepare their Heart unto thee : and ends the whole with a Supplication for Solomon. * Chryfoft. in Rom. 8. 1 f Bifl)op Andrews on the Lord's Proyer, § 7. p. 164.- Vr. Hicks'* Spirit of Enthufmfm exorcised, p. 1 6 . J) Lfghtfoot Hor. Heb. in Luke xi. 1, p. 800. And Chap. 9. Chrlfi as God. ip^ And it was the Promife of God to David, Pfal. lxxxix. 26. He jhall cry unto me, Thou art my Father, my God, and the Rock of my Salvation ; and to all the Jews, Wilt thou net from this time cry unto me, my Father? Jer. ifi. 4. and ver. 19. Thou Jh alt call me my Father? And is not that a Prayer in fact, Ifa. lxiii. 15. Look down from Heaven, 'and behold from the Habitation of thy Hlinefs and of thy Glory : inhere is thy Zeal and thy Strength ? the founding of thy Bowels and of thy Mercies towards me ? are they refrain d ? Doubtlefs thou art our Father, tho Abraham be igno- rant of us, and Ifrael acknowledge us not ; Thou, O Lord, art our Father, our Redeemer, thy Name is from Everlafting. And that Supplication we find, Ifa. Ixiv. 8. But now, Lord, thou art our Father ; we are the Clay, and thou our Potter, and we are all the Work of thine Hand ; be not wroth very fore, Lord, neither remember Iniquity forever. And that the antient Jews had feveral forms of Prayer which began wLh this Invocation, Our Father, is certain in their Mifnah and other Writings. And Dr. Lightfiot allures us^ that it was moll: common with them fo to begin their Supplications ; and that they were taught fo by God himfelf, Exod. iv. 22. for whereas the very Gentile Idolaters did fay, as we find by Jer. U. 27, to a Stock and to a Stone, Tlxni art my Father ; the Ifraelite fhould. be bound to fay, Our Father which art in Heaven *. ^ And in the Temple Service, as it flood in the time of our Saviour, he gives us thisPra\er, which our Saviour himfelf comply'd with in the Temple : || Thou haft loved us, O Lord our God, with an || everlaftfng Love ; with great and abundant Com- paflion haft thou had Mercy upon us, O our Fa- ll ther, our King, for our Fathers fake, who tmfted ' in thee, and thou taughteft them Statutes of Life. * Lightfoot Hor. Hebr. in Mat. vi.9. p. 299, O 2, "So \p6 The Jews worfhip'd Chap. p. u So be gracious to us alfo, O our Father ; O " mod merciful Father, O thou companionate One He was God, he was God the Word, he was the Sou Chap. 10. his own ^Divinity. 205 Son of God, not by communication of Grace, but of Nature, thence he is the natural Son of God ; fo the Son of God, his begotten Son, as to be very God, for the Word was God ; fo the Son of God, as none other was or could be ,• fo the Son of God, as to be the only Son of God, the only- begotten, of the Father, ver. 14. properly and truly God. And to this Divine Sonfhip, that he is God of God, very God of very God ; both God, and Man, and Angels, and even the infernal Spirits give witnefs. God the Father from Heaven proclaim'd him, both at his Baptifm and Transfiguration, to be his Son, his well- beloved Son, in whom he was well pleas' d*. The Angel Gabriel at his Incarnation told his Mo- ther, He Jhould be call'd the Son of God, and the Son of the mcfl High, Luke i. 3 2, 3 5. St. Peter confefs'd, Thou artChriflthe Son of the living God, Mat. xvi. 16. and received this confirmation from Chrift himfelf, That Flejh and Blood had not reveal' 'd it to him, but that it came from God the Father which is in Heaven* Nay,and a whole Legion of unclean Spirits acknow- ledge his Divine Nature in thefe words, Jefusthoit Son of God mofl High, Luke viii. 29. Now would it have been a thing worthy of fo much Noife and Oflentation, had Chrift not been the Son of God in another and more excellent Manner, than any of the Sons of Men ,• had there not been fome thing in it very extraordinary, which might entitle him to fo fublime and divine a Pri- vilege ? Tho John the Baptift were a Prophet, yea and more than a Prophet, yet we do not rind that the Devils flood in awe of him, or look'd upon him as the Son of God. To which of all the holy Angels, as St. Paul argues with admirable Strength, did the * Mat. Hi. 17. ch. xvii. 5. Lord io6 Chrijl's Teflimony of Chap. 10. Lord fay at any time, thou art my Son, this day have 1 begotten thee ? And who can fliew us any King, but Chrift, that was the Son of God, as w ell as of David, whom God the Lord advanc'd to fo high an Honour, as to caufe him to Jit down at his own right Hand, until all his Enemies were made his footfiool ? Pfal.cx. i. Tho Angels, Kings and Prophets, were the Sons of God by a communication of more fpecial Grace than had been generally granted to the Sons of Men, yet none but Chrift is honour'd with thofe high Prerogatives of being call'd his own Son, Rom. viii. 32. his only Son, Mark iii. 17. his only begotten Son, John iii. 16. and the Heir of all Things, Heb.1.2* Which glorious Titles being laid together, do put a very fignal and material Difference between the Sons of God by Adoption and Grace, and Jefus Chrift the Son of God by Nature. It appears therefore that Chrift Jefus has declar'd his own Di- vinity, and fully acknowledged that he was God, God by Nature and not by Favour, when he calls himfelf the only-begotten Son of God. Thirdly, Chrift has declar'd his Divine Nature, when he challenges the Works of God, as his own* This we find, John v. 17. My Father worketh hither- to, and I work. The Occafionof thefe Words was this: Chrift had at Jerufalem, on the Sabbath-Day, cur'd a mi- ferable Creature, that had been difeas'd eight and thirty Years ; the Jews were offended that it was done on the Sabbath-Day, and that the cur'd Per- fon had obey'd him that heal'd him: and their Re- fentment was fo great, that they profecured this poor Man before the $reat Sanhedrim, and refolv'd to Hay Chrift for a prof aner of the Sabbath. Chrift Chap. 10. his own 'Divinity. 207 Chrifi: in juftification of what he had done, and in his own Defence, made this Anfwer, My Father worketh hitherto and I work ; and it does not appear that he made any other. And by thefe Words Chrifi excufes himfelf from the Charge they had laid a- gainft him of violating the Sabbath, for that the Sabbath was only broke by Mens doing any Work, but not by God's working ; for that God from the Creation of the World to that very Day, always work'd on the Sabbath-Days in preferving the World which he had created : and that he being the Son of God, and God his natural Father, work'd together with God his Father, an Inftance of which Divine Works they had now before their Eyes ,• and therefore he could not be guilty of breaking the Sabbath, that work'd not like a Man but as God. And Chrift tells us, that he even from the Creation of the World, co-operated with the Father, and work'd together with him to that very Day. But how did the Jews under/land this Reply? this we rind ver. 18. Therefore the Jews fought the more to kill him, becaufe he not only had broken the Sabbath-, but fa id aljo that God was his Father, making himfelf equal with God. There is a Strength in the Original which our Trandation does not reach, ctKhti: £ vAl't&L iJW 'ihoyt * Qiov ; which, with Sub- miifioft, I think fhould be thus render'd, but be- caufe alfo he [aid that God was his own proper Fa- ther ; for the Force of iJW is loft in our Verfion, which, as £ez,a well obferves, fignifies a Father proper and peculiar to himfelf. And the Force of that Word made the Jews fay, that Chrifi made him- felf equal with God ; for every Ifaelite might fay that God was his Father, Exod.iv.22. but could not fay that God was his own proper peculiar Father. The Belgick Verfion therefore reads it, HOC «50W ftn mm $ a&er foafc that God was his own 208 Chrifis Tefiimony of Chap. io, own Father. And that the Word &P/o? will bear that Conftru&ion, appears by our Verfion, which has often render'd it (o '- as John viii.44. I*. tuv i«T/W a*a«, he fpeaketh of his own: Afts ii. 6. t* i^igt fiaAflu, in his own Language : ver 8. rf iJfy JWi*7p» in our own Tongue. And ^£fc iv. 32. neither faid any of them that ought of the Things which he poflefs'd, i'JW £vcu, was his own; 2 Pet. iii. 3. vJ\tt ids Wets i 209 the Works which he does together with God the Father, ver. iq, 20. then anfwered Jefus and /aid unto them, Verily, verily I fay unto you, the Son can do nothing of himfelf, but -what he feeth the Father do ; for 'what things foever he doth, thefe alfo doth the Son likewife* Here it is plain that the Operation of the Father and the Son - is undivided, and the Work one. And therefore this A&ion or Work of the Son cannot be criminal, nor deem'd Co i with- out reflecting on the Works of the Father, for that they are one : for there is a great Force in the word opo'ius, likewise, namely, with the fame Judgment, with the fame Knowledge, with the fame Will, with the fame Right, with the fame Power, to the fame End, and in the fame Man- ner. So that this Verfe is fo far from expreffing any Inequality, that it expreffes the higheft Equa- lity that can be conceiv'd, or Words can utter. The Reafon is added, ver. 20. For the Father loveth the Son, and fieweth him all things that himfelf doth; and he will flew him greater Works, that ye may marvel Chrift adds this on purpofe to con- vince them of his Divine Power, that he had not boafted of a pretended Omnipotence, but that he had declared the Truth ', for that he ("even for their Conviction if they would believe, or for their Condemnation if they refus'd fuch Evidence) would do even greater things than curing the paralytick Perfon. Chrift had as yet not done many Miracles : he had cur'd this Man, and the Nobleman's Son, ch. iv. 50. he had turn'd the Water into Wine, ch.ii.9* but he promis'd to do greater, and thefe are nam'd, ver. 2 1. For as the Father raifeth up the Dead and quickneth them, even fo the Son quickneth whom be will. But the Converfion of the Soul not being vifible to the Eye, he adds, ver. 25. Verily, Verily I fay unto you, the Hour if coming, and now is, when P the 2 1 o Chrifis Tejlimony of Chap, i o. the Dead ft all hear the Voice of the Son of God, and they that hear fiall live ; which is fliil more plainly exprefs'd, ver. 28. Now that none but God can do fuch things is certain ; for the Apoftle fays, Rom.iv. 17. that God quickens the Dead, and caUeth thofe things which be not as tho they were* Another of thofe greater things, is the giving of eternal Life, ver. 24. Verily, Verily I fay unto you, he that heareth my Word, and believeth on him that feat me, hath everlafling Life, and fiall not come into Condemnation, but is paffed from Death unto Life, And to this is added the other great Ad of Judg- ing the World*, ver. 22. Fur the Father judgeth no Man, but has committed all Judgment unto the Son ; and ver. 27. And has given him Authority to execute Judgment alfo, becaufe he is the Son of Man. And the Reafon of all is laid down, ver* 26. becaufe this Chrifl is God equal with the Father ; For as the Father has Life in himfelf fo hath he given to the Son to have Life in himfelf: and in a word, the end of all is, 'That all Men fiould honour the Son even as they honour the Father ; he that honoureth not the Son, honoureth not the Father which has fent him 9 ver. 23. I iliall only add, that after Chrifl: had made this Apology, and declar'd and vindicated his Di- vinity, he obviates an Objection which he fore- faw the Jews might make, namely, that he faid this of himfelf, and they were not oblig'd to take his word for a Matter of that high Concern, ver. 3 1. If I bear witnefs of my felf, my Witnefs is not true. Chrifl therefore produces other Witnefles, which might be of more credit with them than himfelf, to confirm the Truth of w r hat he had declar'd. Thefe he names in the following Verfes ; firfl the Spirit of God, Matth* Hi. ij. which had mod fo- lemnly declar'd him to be the Son of God at his. Baptifm. Secondly, St. John the Baptift. Thirdly, the Chap, i o. his own ^Divinity. 1 1 1 the Father himfelf. Fourthly, his Works, which were the Works of God the Father, as well as his own. Fifthly, the Scriptures which he appeals to, and by which he is willing to be try'd ,• thofe very Scriptures they were (o fond of, and had fo great value for, thefe fhall be the Judges. And laft'ljf Mofesy for had ye believd Moksye would have believd me y for he wrote of me, ver. 46. Chrift Jefus therefore not only declar'd his oWri Divinity in this Chapter, but produces very good Evidences that he had not impos'd upon them, but what he had faid of his Divine Nature was true, and that he had faid no more than whag the Holy Scriptures had faid before. Fourthly, Chrift bore witnefs to his own Divinity when he fpeaks of the Bread of Life, John vi. In this Chapter we find that Chrift fed five thoufand Men, befides Women and Chil- dren, with five Loaves and two Fifhes ; which great Miracle fo furpriz'd the People, that they concluded this Perfon mud neceflarilv be the MeP* Has, a divine Perfon, the Son of God, (for the Son of God and the Meffias were convertible Terms) for they were fure, and had receiv'd by antient Tradition, that the Meflias was to work Miracles, and they could not imagine that any Miracle could be greater than this. Hereupon the Multitude would make him King ; for they had conceiv'd that no Perfon whatever could be fo proper to be their Guide, as he that could feed them with Miracles : but Jefus, with another Miracle, withdrew himfelf from them. However, the next Day meeting the People in the Synagogue at Capernaum, he took occafion from that Miracle to teach them, and perfuade them to look and labour for the true fpiritual Meat; p 2 «e 1 1 1 Chrifl s Tejttmony of Chap, i o. at this the Jews murmured. Chrift anfwers them* ver. 3 5. that he is the Bread of Life, and of a nobler Kind, and better Duration, and more happy Ef- fects, than that Manna which their Fathers eat in the VVikiernefs ; they eat and dy'd, but thofe that eat this Bread (hall live for ever : at which fome were offended, and left Chrift. But Chrift asking the Apoftles, whether they were ready to go too, Peter anfwer'd, and made a noble Con- feflion of his Faith and of the reft of the Apoftles, Lord, to whom Jhall we go ? thou haft the Words of eternal Life, ver s 68, 69. And we believe and are fure that thou art the Chrifl, the Son of the living God. But how does it from hence appear, that Chrift faid one word of his Divinity ? Peter indeed, whe- ther for himfelf alone, or for the reft alfo, made fuch a Confeflion concerning Chrift, but Chrift has not hid any thing himfelf. To this Objection I anfwer, that Chrift difco- ver'd and declared his own proper Divinity feve- ral ways. Firfl, In the Miracle it felf, which none but the Almighty God could do. Several indeed of God's Minifters and Meffengers have been em- powered to do Miracles, and have done therri -, but then they have always acknowledg'd that this was a delegated Power, and declar'd the Name of God who commifiion'd them, as is plain in Mofes and the Apoftles ; but Chrift did this Miracle by his own Power, as the Almighty Creator, who had Power of himfelf and in himfelf to increafe that Bread, to \\ hat Quantity he fhould think fit. Secondly, Chrift having fliown his Divine Power by that Miracle, he now takes occafion to tell them fo in plain words. He tells them thefe three things : I, That he is the Son of God. 2. That Chap, l o. his own Divinity. i i 5 2. That he is fent from Heaven as their fpin- tual Food. 3. That he came to heal them both in Soul and Body. 1. He calls himfelf the Son of God, ver. 32. Mofes gave you not that Bread from Heaven, but my Father giveth you the true Bread from Heaven. Chrift fpeaks of the antient Manna, and oppofes himfelf to it as the more noble, ver. 33. For the Bread of God is he which cometh down from Heaven, and giveth Life unto the World. The Properties of Chrift are, that he really came from Heaven, that he gives the true Life, and that he gives it to the whole World. The antient Manna, at the beft but a Fi- gure of this, was not the true ; that fell from the Air only, that continu'd only a corporal Life, this an immortal and fpiritual ,• and that was given only to one Nation in the Defart. On the other hand, Chrifl came truly from Heaven, was fent by God, who is his Father, his own Father, in a different manner a Father than he was to the Jews, a Fa- ther by Nature ; and he is that Bread which was defign'd from the very Foundation of the World to be the Saviour, and to give Life eternal to all the People of God, in all and every Nation that receive and obey him. The Jews underftood him as Chrifl would be underftood, but they believ'd not, but began to mock him, ver. 34. Lord evermore give us this Bread. Several of the Antients have expounded this Verfe, as if the Jews jefted and ridicul'd Chrift, as if they had faid, Alas ! there is no fuch Bread, or if there be, thou canft not give it ; and if thou haft it, why do you not give it unto us? And that this ScofHng was the Reafon of Chrift's Reproof, ver. 3 6. But I faid unto you, that ye alfo have feen me and believe not. However, tho the Jews were unworthy of a further Explication, yet Chrift, for P 3 our % 1 4 Ghrtji's Teflimony of Chap, i o. our fakes, goes on, and explains the nature of this Bread, that it is truly divine, and that the end of it is to make us eternally happy, which none but he that is God can do : this Chrift explains at large, ver. gj. / am the Bread of Life-, he that comet h to me Jh all never hunger, and he that believeth in me fiall never thrift. See further, ver. 38, 39, 40. At firft the Jews only fcofted, but now Chrift ftill more and more declaring his Divinity, they began to be angry, and to murmur ; for he being to their fight only a Man, and making himfelf God fo very plainly, they began to be out of humour, and faid, Is not this Jefus the Son of Jofeph, whofe Father and Mother we know? how is it then that he faith , I came down from Heaven ? ver. 42. Chrift is not mov'd with their Impertinence ; he diffuades them indeed from murmuring, but goes on to tell them, That this their Murmuring is owing to their Unbelief; that they who reject God may be rejected by God, and they that refill Grace may be depriv'd of Grace, for that they do not confider the Method of God's dealing with Men, ^r. 43, 44, 45. However, whatever you think of me, or believe of me, I have Power to give eternal Life, for I am the living Bread;' and continues his Difcourfe to ver. 39. about his eternal Power of giving Life to them that believe in him. The more Chrift aflur'd them of his divine Na- ture, the more they were offended; for ver. 61. we find that even fome of his Difciples murmured, nay and forfook him too, ver, 66. At firft they conceal'd their Uneafinefs, but there's no Secrecy p infinite Knowledge; for ver. 61. it is faid, That Jefus knew in himfelf that they murmured. And therefore to put them out of all doubt, he asks them, What, and if ye fiat/ fee the Son of Man afcend up where he was before ? it is the Spirit that quickneth r the Fkfh profaeth nothing \ the Words that I fpeak unto you, Chap, l o. his own jDhinity. 2 i j you, they are Spirit and they are Life, ver. 62, £3. If what he told them offended them, becaule he faid he was God, and came from Heaven to become a fpiritual Bread for them, to make them happy, they mnft be even offended ; but the time would come that they fhould be convinc'd of the Truth, for they fhould fee him afcend into Heaven, from whence he came : but he found they were fo carnal, that ail his fpiritual Difcourfe was loft upon them, and affected them not. And when many forfook him for that very Rea- fon, becaufe he had fpoke fo largely of his Divi- nity, which they could not believe of a Man of fo mean a Figure, he ask'd the Apoftles alfo whe- ther they would not leave him ? But they being convinc'd of the Truth of his Doctrine, and un- derftanding the Spirit of it, reply'd, or Peter for them, with a ConfelTion of his Divinity and their Faith, Lord, to whom jh all we go ? thou hafl the Words of eternal Life ; and we believe and are fare, that thou art that Chrift, the Son oj the living God. Fifthly, Chrift fpake of his own divine Nature, when he joined himfclf with the Father. John viii. 16. I am not alone, but I and the Father that fent me. In this Text Chrift calls God his Father, not only in that peculiar manner as his natural Father ; but fays that the Union between him and the Fa- ther is fo great, fo near and indiffoluble, that they can never be parted ; I am not alone, but I and the Father that fent me. At the 1 2th Verfe Chrift had hld^ I am the Light of the World-, he that followeth me jhall net walk in Darknefs y but jhall have the Light of Life. In which Verfe he declares his Nature, and the End of his Appearance ; his Nature, as the true Light; the P 4 End, 2 \ 6 Chrijl's Tejitmony of Chap, i o. End, that the World might be faved. Many of the Servants of God have been fplendid Lights, but their Light was but borrowed, whether "Prophets or Apoftles ; but Chrift is the true Light, the Sun of Righteoufnefs that has healing in his Wings , Mai. iv. 2. St. John, ch. i. 9. calls him the true Light, to de- clare his Nature, and to diftinguifli him from all other Lights, who received their Illumination from him, and him only. The Jews objed, thou bearefi record of thy felf, thy Record is not true, ver. 13. It is indeed unufual to admit a Man's Teftimony in his own Cafe, but that does not take from the Truth of it ,• tho it be not generally taken for Truth, ftill it may be fo : and in cafe of Accufation a Man may fpeak in his own Defence, efpecially when no Man can be fup- pofed to know fo much of the matter as the Perfon accufed. Chrift was accufed as the moft vain-glorious Per- fon in the World, if not the mod falfe, in calling himfelf the Son of God, the Saviour of the World, the Bread from Heaven, the Light of the World, and the like. He certainly knew more of this than all the Sons of Men, and all the Angels of Heaven together; he therefore anfwers them, 'tho I bear re- cord of my felf yet my record is true ; for I know whence I came and whither I go, but ye cannot tell whence I come and whither I go, ver. 14. As he had called himfelf the Son of God, and the Light of the World, fo he only knew whence that Light fhone, and to what Place it fhould return; fo that Chrift here afTerted his Divinity in that Expreffion, nsGodofGod, Light of Light, very God of very God: And adds, if this free and open ConfeMion does not convince or fa- tisfy you, altho it be true, ye have the Witnefs of my Father [or your farther Convidion; for I am not alone , but I and the Father that fent me. And ver* 1 7. he appeals to their Law, that they ought to be fatisfied Chap. 1 o. his own ^Divinity. 1 1 7 fatisfied with that Evidence, for that the Teflimonj of two Men is true, Deut. xi. 6. And if the Evi- dence of two mortal Men may be relied on, much more the Witnefs of two divine Perfons, whofe higheft Honour and Perfection is, that they cannot lye j and therefore he fays, ver. 18. / am one that bear witnefs of my felf and the Father that fent me beareth witnefs of me. Sixthly, Chrifi bore witnefs of his own Divinity, when he mofl exprefly calls himfelf the Son oj God. John ix. 35, 3<5, 37, 38. Jefus heard that they had caft him out ; and when he had found him he J aid unto him, Dofl thou believe on the Son of God ? He anfwered and faid, Who is he, Lordy that I may believe on him ? And Jefus faid unto him, 'Thou haft both fe en him, and it is he that talketh with thee : And he faid, Lord, I be~ lieve, and he worshipped him. It appears in the rlrft part of this Chapter, that Chrift had given Sight to a Man that was born blind ,• and that the Man, becaufe he could not give a good Account of him that had cured him, and becaufe he would not fpeak evil of him, as the reft of the Jews did, was excommunicated. Our Saviour therefore finding the Man, was refolved to confirm him in the good Opinion he had of him ; and further, would reveal himfelf to him as the Son of God. When he met him therefore, he immedi- ately puts this Queftion to him, Deft thou believe on the Son of God ? Nothing can be plainer, more open, or more exprefs. There is a Strength in the Ori- ginal, which our Language cannot exprefs, «V rlv cjov to 0g?, on the Son of God ; not as all Men, or the more peculiar Favourites of Heaven were, but in a more peculiar manner the Son of God : And the poor Man prefently underftood that it could not be fuch a Son of God as all Jews were, by his Anfwer, %\ ' Chrtjl's Tefltmony of Chap. ! 6. Anfwer, #>%0 is he, Lord, that I might believe on him ? And our Saviour's Anfwer puts it out of all manner of doubt, It is he that talketh with thee. Now I ap- peal to all Men that are not prejudiced, whether there can be any TefHmony plainer than this ? and the Confequence fhow'd it, for the poor Man was fo fenfible of his Duty, that when he knew Chrifl: to be God, he immediately worfhipped him. And that this was a religious Worfhip, is plain from the Word, being the fame as Mat. iv. the fame ufed to exprefs divine Worfhip and Adoration by ; and be- caufe our Saviour did not repel him : Nay, he high- ly approved of it, as appears from ver. 39. For Judg- ment am I come into the World, that they 'which fee not might fee , and that they which fee might be made blind: For by thefe Words Chrifl: declared that he is ap- pointed by God the Father, to be the King and Ruler over all Mankind, to illuminate the blind, that they may know and worfhip him, and to ftrike them with judicial Blindnefs, that Uiut their Eyesagainfl the Light of his Grace. Seventhly, Chrifl bears witnefs to his Divine Nature* when he faith, I am the Son of God> John x.36. Say ye of him whom the Father has fane tified and fern into the World, thou blafphemefl, becaufe I faid I am the Son of God ? In the firfl: Part of this Chapter, Chrifl: had called himfelf the Door and the good Shepherd ; and that he might perform the Office of a good Shepherd well, he tells us, ver. 15. that his Knowledge and his Love is beyond human Shepherds, it is divine ; and that he knoweth not the Sheep only, but that he knows even God the Father, and that in the fame perfect manner as he is known to and by the Father; As the Father knoweth me 7 even fo know I the Father, It Chap. 1 0. his own fDivinity. 2 \ p It has been obferv'd, that Words of Knowledge among the Jews alfo exprefs'd Love and Affe&ion • and that Chrift therefore, when he faid, ver, 14. / know my Sheep and am known of mme 9 exprefs'd his Affection towards them, as well as his Know- ledge of them, and that he was alfo beloved by them as well as known to them. And Chrift ufes the fame Word here, to fignify his Knowledge and Love towards God the Father, as the Father has towards him. And it is further obferv'd, that the word xctOwV, even fo, when apply'd to the Perfons of the Holy Trinity, does not fignify a Likenefs, a Similitude, but an Equality ; fo that he hereby declares his Almighty Power, that he is able to preferve his Church, as he does declare his in- finite Love whereby he has redeemed his Church. And he (hows that Almighty Power in this Par- ticular, That tho for their Redemption he laid down his Life, yet for their Salvation he will take it up again, he being that God who has the Power of Life and Death in his own hands, ver. 17, 18. This Difcourfe caufing a Di virion among the Jews, fome being for him, others againft him, tome time after, near two Months, the Jews ac the Feaft of Dedication came and ask'd him, tell us plainly if thou be the Chrift. Jefus reproach'd them for their Unbelief, and appeals to his Works, whe- ther they are not fufficient to convince them ; and further tells them, ver* 30. that he and his Father are One. This was very plain ; and at this open ConfeiTion they were fo enrag'd, that they took up Stones to flone him. Chrift expoftulates Witbj them, whether they ftoned him for his good Works; they anfiuer'd, for a good 'Work ive flone thee not, but for Blafphemy, and becaufe that thou, being a Man, make ft thy felf God y ver. 3 3 . Chrift deny'd not that he made himfelf God, but he deny'd the charge of Blafphemy, from their very Law- 220 Chrifis Tefttmony of Chap, i o. Law. If he had been but a Prophet, he might without Blafphemy be call'd God j how much more might he call himfelf the Son of God, who was fandify'd of the Father > and then appeals again to his Works, ver. 3 7* If I do not the Works of my Father ', believe me not ; but if I do, tho ye believe not me-, believe the Works, that ye may know and believe that the Father is in me, and I in him. Obferve here, while he appeals to his Works, that he aflerts a- gain the Unity of the Father and himfelf, as one God, as he had faid before, / and my Father are one y ver. 30. I fliail only obferve farther on this Text *, cc That therefore /aid I } that he Jhail take of mine, and Jhalljhew it unto you. This is a mod remarkable Text of Scripture ; Chrift here fpeaks of the Holy Spirit* which he had promis'd to his Di'fciples in the foregoing Verfes, to guide them into all Truth. And pen 13. he fays, that that Guidance will be directed even by himfelf, for that the Spirit fhall not a& alone, or feparate from the other Perfons ; for he fi a!/ not [peak of himfelf, but whatfoever he flail hear, that. Jhail hefpeak : And he will /hew you things to come ; he Jhail glorify me, for he Jhail receive of mine, and JlialJJheio it unto you, ver. 14. Which may be thus paraphras'd : " Whatever Influences the Holy Spirit of God " fhall (bed forth, whatever Truths he fhall reveal, tc whatever Miracles he fhall perform, they will None but him that is equal to the Father, and of the fame Nature with the Fa- ther, could poflibly make it : But this is the Ground of Ctirift's Claim, becaufe he had a hand in God's Works, and was guiding, and affifting, and influen- cing the very Spirit of God. When we confider, therefore, that the Lord Jefus was Meeknefs and Modefty it felf, and the great Chap- i o. his own jDivinity. n? great Pattern of Humility ,* nay, the greateft Pat- tern the World ever faw, and yet made this Claim* we rauft believe him to be equal with the Father, and of the fame divine Nature with the Father, whofe Glory is equal, whofe Majefty is coeternal : Or we mud believe that he was the moft ambitious Man in the whole World. Eleventhly, Chrift bare witnefs to his own Divinity r when he calls himfelf by one of the great Names of God. John yu'l 58. / am. In the foregoing part of this Difcourfe, the jews had largely fhown the mean Opinion they had of Chrift, which our Saviour now endeavoured to remove, by telling them, however mean he was to their view, however defpis'd with them, yet their great Father Abraham, in whom they fo much glo- ried, even he had a far greater Opinion of Chrift $ than they could have of Abraham. And Abrahams great Veneration of Chrift appeared herein, that he rejoiced to fee the Day of Chrift, w. $6. Tour Father Abraham rejoiced to fee my Day, and he faw it and was glad. Then the Jews faid unto him, 'Thou art not yet fifty Tears old, and haft thou feen Abraham ? Jefus faid unto them, Verily, Verily I fay unto you % before Abraham was, I am : He does not fay I was, but / am ; which being the very felf-fame Name by which God reveal'd himfelf, even this Jefus re* veal'd himfelf to Mofes before his Incarnation as the eternal God, he now< ufes it to let the Tews know, that he was that very God who appear d to Mofes, and who had an eternal Exiftence before ever Abraham was born. And therefore it fully appears from this Text, as Chrift was not afliam'd to call himfelf the Son of Man, fo he w r as not a- Q^ fraid 228 Chrifis Tejltmony of Chap, i o, fraid to own himfelf to be the Son of God, the eternal God, the only true God, the God of A' braham, and the God of Mofes. I ffluft cbferve further on this Text, that there is a great force in the Orignal, t§iv 'A£s**p yivi&ui \yu «/u' 5 before Abraham was, exifled, fieret, as the Lacin Vulgar has it, was made, I am ; where there is a marvelous Antitheils between being and not being, made and not made .: before Abraham had a Being, when he was not yet made, I was, lam ; and that / am includes all Tenfes, from everlafling to everlaft- ing thou art God. St. Auftin on thefe Words fays, * Weigh, I pray thee, the Words, and underfland theMyftery : Be- fore Abraham was made ; obferve, was made per- tains to his human Nature ; I am, pertains to Chrift's divine Nature : He was made, becaufe Abraham was a Creature ; he did not fay before A- braham was I was ; but before Abraham was made, who was not made but by me, / am : neither did he fay, before Abraham was made, I was made ; no, in the beginning God made Heaven and Earth, for in that beginning he was the Word ; before Abra- ham was made, / am : acknowledge therefore the Creator, and difcern the Creature. That the Jews underftood this as we do, appears from their Rage, ver* 59. Then took they up Stones to caft at him; and while they were willing and ready to deftroy him for declaring his divine Nature, they faw at that very time the effect of it, by withdrawing himfelf from them in a miraculous manner. Auguft. Traft.4$. Twelfth- Chap. 10. his own Divinity. 229 Twelfthly, Chrifl declard his divine Nature in his Sacerdotal Prayer. John xvii. 1, &c. This Chapter contains the Prayer, which Chrift as our High Prieft offer'd to God the Father, juft before he made himfelf the Oblation for our Sins ; in which Prayer are contained the molt furprizing Declarations of his divine Nature, and of his Love manifefted in our Redemption ; and that ex- prefs'd in a manner fo pathetic, fo moving, as no Words can utter, and as could only be exprefs'd by him, that is Mercy and Companion it felf. That which falls chiefly under my prefent Con- fideration, is what Chrift has declar'd of his divine Nature in this Prayer; and that will eafily be known, when we confider what Chrift pray'd for. This we find, war. i. Father, the Hour is come, glo- rify, thy Son. We muft look upon Chrift here as our Mediator, and as fuch to be offer'd for our Sins ; and therefore he prays, that as he is now to be made the Sin-offering, the Sacrifice for Sin, that God the Father, who has declared from Heaven, that he was pleas'd in him, will be further pleas'd to accept of the Atonement ; and after he has fub- mitted to Death, to honour him with a glorious Refurre&ion, that the World may know, tho he was a Man of Sorrows, and acquainted with Grief, that he was not forfaken of God ; but that God was his Father, tho he was defpis'd and rejected of Men 1 that he was not an Impoftor, but the very Meftias promis'd to the Fathers, the very Sa- viour that was to fave his People from their Sins ; altho he appeared only as a Man, yet that he was God incarnate, whofe divine Nature was hid and veii'd with human Nature; that the Father would QL3 now z 3 o Chrijt's Tejtlmony of Chap. i o. now be pleas'd to declare to all the World, that this Saviour was no Jefs Perfon than his Son 7 the eternal Son of the eternal Father ; that his Ser- vants and Difciples may receive the greater Com- fort irom the greatnefs of their Matter; and that his Enemies, who wilfully refus'd him, may be the mere confounded for having refus'd the Son of God, and crucifying the Lord of Glory. Which may be thus paraphras'd : cc O Father, the time is now come, which thy felf has deter- min'd, that I am to be orfer'd up a Sacrifice for the miferable finful World ! O let the Oblation be acceptable unto thee j and becaufe this my Death will be furrounded with Ignominy and Difgrace, I efteem'd an Offender, as a Blaf- phemer againft thee, plead thou my Caufe, O Father, and convince the World of the Injury that is done to thy only Son : And becaufe the longer thou tarried before thou glorified me, the more Ignominy will fall upon me, haflen thou, arife to Judgment, O Lord, fhew forth the Juftice of my Caufe, that I fufter'd not for any Sin of my own, but was the Offering for the Sins of the World, that Men may now know me, and that all that believe in me may glorify thy bleiTed Name. And our Saviour purpefely added this Claufe to his Petition, That thy Son alfo may glorify thee ; be- caufe the Son cannot be glorified without glorifying the Father, nor can the^Father be glorified but in the Glorification of the Son ; and then is the Son ,fied, when his Divinity is declared and mani- icfted to the World ,• and then is the Father glori- fied, when Men honour the Son, even as they ho- nour the Father ; fir he that homnreth not the Son, ho- mUYtth Hot the Father which has feat him. At the fecond Verfe, Chrift gives a further Rea- fen why his Prayer fhould be heard, and he glori- hed as the Son of God : As thou haft given him power over Chap. 1 o. his own ^Divinity. 2 3 1 over all Flefi, that he jhould give eternal Life to as many as thou haft given him. Now to give eternal Life, is the Power of God only ; Chrift therefore as Me- diator pray'd that he might be glorified, becaufe the Father had given him power to give eternal Life ; he had receiv'd this Power as God : 'twas necetfary, therefore, that Chrift fliould be declar'd to be that God, that has the power of giving Life e- ternal ,• and fo the Particle **8»*, a*> has the force of a Caufe, becaufe thou hafl given him power. The third Verfe explains wherein that eternal Life does confift, namely, in the Knowledge and Enjoyment (for that is included in the Word knovj) of the Triunal God, the Father and the Son [ including the Holy Spirit. J And this is Life eter- nal, that they might know thee the only true God, and Jefus Chrift whom thou haft font. This Verfe has been us'd by the Arians as an Ar- gument againft Chrift being, the true God ; but the Fathers have ftoutly defended it againft their Mifconftruclion, and have (hown that it is indeed a powerful Text to prove the Divinity of Chrift. The Arians laid their Strefs on the Word p»W, only, that the Father is the only true God, exclu- five of Jefus Chrift whom he had fenc. But the Orthodox Chriftians * fhew'd that this was the higheft Violence that could be committed upon this Text, both becaufe the whole Context fpeaks of Chrift, as a Perfon exifting before the World was, as having a Glory equal to the eternal Father, as being the Son of God in fuch a manner as none but the eternal Son of God can be : And be- caufe the word f*W, only, is not exclusive of the Son, but of all created Beings, factitious Gods and I- dols, or any other Creature, tho never fo exalted. * Ambrof. 1. 5. de fide, c. 2. Epiphan. Hser. 60. Hilarius deTrin. 1. 4, 5- (£4 For 1 3 1 Chriji's < Tejlt7nony of Chap, i o. For that Chnit did not exclude himfelf, appears from the whole Prayer, as ver. $. where he men- tions the Glory which he had with the Father before the World was : ver. p. he fays he is one with the Father : And again, ver.n. and 25. he fpeaks of his Know- ledge of the Father, as of one and the fame divine Nature. And therefore it cannot be conceiv'd that Chrift could exclude himfelf in this Text from being God, and yet afiert it in almoft every Verfe of this Chapter, and every Word of this Prayer. But betides, the very Conftrudion of the Words will not allow Chrift to be excluded from being God : for as it has been obferv'd * that the Order of the Words is thus, This is Life eternal, that they might know thee, and J ejus Chrift, whom thou haft Jent y the only true God ; Novatianus has remarked f, that Chrift is here cali'd God as well as the Father : If he did not mean that Chrift was God in the fame fenfe as the Father, and only God as well as the Father, why did he add Jefus Chrift ? But he add- ed him, becaufe he would have him acknowledged to be God. This Argumentation is ftrong : he trufted in God, let him de- liver him now if he will have him, for he faid I am the Son of God. This Chrift had faid feveral times, and never retracted it, and this the Jews look'd upon as Blaf- phemy : Chrift on the contrary, averted it for Truth, that he was really fo ; and, as I have fhown before, appealed to his Works, and the Tefti- mony of John, of Mofet, and the Scriptures, in proof that the Meflias who was promis'd (hould be God. The Jews believ'd him not, and there- fore profecuted him to Death ; and this their Ig- norance of him, was the Motive for Chrift's In- terceflion, Father forgive them, for they know not what they do. By this Interceflion of Chrift, it appears that the Jews were really miftaken when they crucify'd him as if he had been a Blafphemer. On the con- trary, by that very Interceffion of Chrift, it appears that he defended himfelf from that Accufation, and Chap. 10. his own ^Dtvimty. 2,3^ and declar'd in that laft moment, that he was in very deed the true and natural Son of God. And this Teftimony is the more to be regarded, bccaufe they were his dying Words, when he openly, before all the World, clear'd himfelf from that heavy Charge, and pray'd for the Pardon of thofe who had wrongfully condemn'd him; and declar'd that he was the Son of God, and feal'd the Truth of that Declaration with his Blood, and dy'd immediately upon it. And this laft Prayer, this companionate Inter- ceflion of Chrift, is of more force with me than a thoufand Demonftrations ; for what could our bleflfed Saviour purpofe by declaring before the World that his Accufers were miftaken, and as fuch were Obje&s of God's Compaflion, but to vindicate his own Divinity, and declare on his dying Words that he was wrongfully accus'd ? And tho they look'd upon him as a mere Man, a Crea- ture only, that he was neverthelefs the Son of God, not by Adoption or Grace, but the eternal natural Son of God, very God of very God. And therefore this Prayer may be thus paraphrafed : cc Look down, O Father, in pity upon thefe my Per- " fecutors ; thou knoweft, Father, how greatly they " are miftaken, how much they are deceiv'd ; I have " declar'd thy Truth, that I am thy Son, thine only no, never. Or was Mofes, or Abraham, or any of the Pa- triarchs, ever invok'd together in any Ad of A- doration or Benediction ? No, only the Name of the God of Ifrael^ who is jealous of his Glory, and will never give it to any of his Creatures. God cannot fufter any created Being to fhare with him in the Prerogative of Adoration ; thofe Rights of divine Honour are incommunicable, and no created Being can be admitted to be God's Rival. This Commifllon of Baptifm therefore, is the ftrongeft. Evidence that Chrifl could give us of his divine Nature, and is the fulleft Demonstration that the Apoflles worfhip'd Chrifl as God, that matter of fact can give us ; for in this folemn Dedication, both they that baptize, and they that are baptiz'd, do not only acknowledge the Son and Holy Ghofl to be of equal Honour, Power, and Dignity with the Father, but do devote them- felves to them in the fame manner as to the Fa- ther, and invoke and adore and wor/hip them as God. It Chap. 10. his own Divinity. 245 It is objeded, that the Apoftles baptiz'd in the Name of Jefus only*, and that the Jews were fo baptiz'd, becaufe the Perfon of Jefus was thereby acknowledged to be the Meifias ; and f that the Names of Father, Son and Spirit were not un- known to them, but that the Gentiles were bap- tiz'd in the Form as delivered by our Saviour, in the Name of the Father, Son and Holy Ghoft. But with humble Submiflion, I can never believe that the Apoftles altered the Form of Baptifm fo folemnly enjoin'd by Chrift ; for Chrift commanded that that Form fhould be obferv'd in the baptizing of all Nations, and the Apoftles had no Power to alter or fuperfede that more folemn Injunction* And the meaning of baptizing || in the Name of Chrift in the feveral Texts alledg'd, is only that they baptiz'd in the Religion of Chrift, and by the Authority and Commiflion which they had received from the Lord Jefus. And as this Authority was fo great, and the Commiflion fo pofitive, and enjoin 'd as a perpetual Law, the greater is the Impudence of the Soci- nians to aflert that it was but a temporary In- junction, that it is an idle Ceremony **, and that they hope they (hall fee it neglefted and defpis'd ft as fuperftitious or idolatrous \ and thereupon the Socinians in Poland and Tranfylvania would not ufe the Catholick Form, but baptiz'd in the Name °f J e f us that was crucify ed y till by a fevere Edift of the moft ferene Prince of 'Tranfylvania, they were oblig'd to ufe the common Form ||||. And * A£h ii. 38. ch. viii. 16. ch, x. 48. ch. xix. 5. Rom. vi. 3. Gal. iii. 2,7. • f Lightfoot Hor. Hebr. in Matth. xxviii. p. $o£, &c. || Ravanel, Biblioth. Voc. Baptifm. p. 1 84. Mr. Wall's Intro* dutlion to Ivfant-Baptifm. ** Rac. Catech. c. 4. q. 4. de Baptifmo. ? • , „ K tf Socin. ad Mofcorcv. Ep, C See ch - *$> N x6 > )]|| Hoornbeck Apparat. p. 78. R3 of 246 Chrtfis TeJiimony y Sec. Chap. 10. of late, whetner ferious or jocofe I know not, (Yho it is dreadful to be jocofe in a Matter of fuch moment) a Writer has fignify'd, that he is for laying Baptifm altogether afide among the Pofterity of baptiz'd Ghriftians *- Thefe Innovations the Socinians have learned from the antient Hereticks, who, as they corrupted the true Faith, alter'd the Form of Baptifm, left it fhould appear inconfiftent with their novel Tenets; for that Form is one of the berr. Fences of the true Faith, and a (landing bar to moft Herefies : they therefore alter'd them, whilft the Catholicks never vary'd it, nor fo much as inferted or added any thing by way of Explication, or in favour of their Principles. And indeed they had no need to do it, and were too modeft and too pious to attempt any Innovation in a facred Law and Con- ftitution of Chrift f. * Emlyn'* Tratts, p. 42,9. -f Dr. WatedandV Serm. p. 318c CHAP. 247 a»*!»^ *x* CHAP. XL G&ri/? worjhifd as God, by fever al Inflames recorded in the Go/pel before his Refeirrec- tion. jgy Come now to Matter of fad, to demonftrate lj| chat the Saints in the Gofpel Difpenfation, uJEm have believed Chrift to be the fupreme eter- nal God, and worihip'd him as fuch. And, Firft, Mary the Mother of Jefus, knew her Son to be God, and worjhip d him as fuch. That the Virgin Mary knew her Son Jefus Chrift to be God, is certain, becaufe at the Annunciation the Angel told her, Thou fhalt conceive in thy Womb) and bring forth a Son^ and fhalt call his Name 'Jefus ; he fh all be great, and (hall be call'd the Son of the Higheft ; and the Lord God Jh all give unto him the Throne of his Father David ; and he fhall reign over the Houfe of Jacob for ever, and of his Kingdom there fhall be no end, Luke i. 31, 32, 33. What could Mary conclude from this Defcription, but that this Child muft be the very God ? Jefus the Saviour was a Name known to the Jews, and his Perfon long'd for ; the Son of the Higheft was as well known to be the Son of God as if it had been fo R 4 W- %^% Chrijl worfhiftd as God Ch. 1 1 , exprefs'd : A King to be enthron'd by the Lord God himfelf, to have an everlafKng Kingdom, and to reign for ever, as that never happen'd to a Mor- tal, nor was like to happen to any Mortal, (he mufl: conclude this Child was God. Nay, the Divine Nature of her Son was farther explain'd to her at ver. 35. to confirm her Faith, and to remove all Doubtfulnefs : The Holy Ghojl Jhall come upon thee, and the Power of the Higheji jhall over- Jhadow thee ; therefore alfo that holy 'thing which Jhall be born of thee, Jhall be call' d the Son of God. And as this Annunciation was made to the blef- fed Virgin, fo God was alfo pleas'd by an Angel to reveal to J of eph her Husband, that his efpoufed Wife was with child in a miraculous Manner, and of no lefs Perfon than the Saviour of the World, no lefs Perfon than thcEmmanuel that was both God and Man, Mat. i. 20, 21. a God, not by Favour or Adoption, but by Nature, that God whofe King- dom is eternal, and whofe Dominion is for ever and ever. Nay more, Mary was made fenfible of the Divine Nature of her Son, by the Salutation of her Coniiii Elizabeth, who cali'd her the Mother of her Lord^ and blefs'd her as fuch. And therefore the holy Virgin, in her Anthem of Praife, magnifies the Lord, and rejoices in God her Saviour. Why was fhe deem'd bleffed among Wo- men, or above all Women, but upon this account, that file was the Mother of her Lord, of her God, of that yery Perfon who was God, and whom fhe had cali'd her God and Saviour } And iter* 49. Hie cali'd him by the Name of the mighty One, or he that is mighty, 'O h»$hi which is HP Shaddai, one of the ten Names of God, Signifying the All-fuffi- cunt, the Almighty ; and file magnifies his Mercy in honouring Ch.it. before his Refurreffion. 249 honouring her above all Women, to become the Mother of him that is her God *. Zacharias worfiip'd Chrifi as God. This Hymn of Zacharias was compos'd at the Circumciflon of John the Baptiffc, fix Months be- fore Chrifi was born : We find it by Luke ch. L ver* 68. to the end of ver. 79. And at ver. 6j. we find it was infpir'd by the Holy Ghoft ; and therefore Zacharias, like the other Prophets, fpake his Faith and Belief of the Chrifi to come, and in this Anthem largely aflerts that Chrifi is both the Saviour of the World, and the eternal Son of God. Ver. 77. he calls Chrifi both the Higheft, and the Lord, the Jehovah : for fpeaking of his Son John, he fays, And thou Child Jh alt be catt'd the Pro- phet of the Higheft, for thou /halt go before the Face of the Lord to prepare his Ways* And this is what the Angel, when he appeared to Zacharias, had taught him, ver. 16, 17. that his Son fhould be the Pro- dromos of the Meffias. And how ? this the Angel alfo explain'd, by turning many of the Children of Ifrael to. the Lord their God, to the Jehovah Elohim ; and Dr. Clarke allows, that in ftri&nefs of Conflruc- tion this Lord their God is Chrifi f- Now if we compare this ver. 77. with Malachi iii. 1. we muft conclude that this Chrift is the Higheft, and that he is Jehova ; for that that Text pf Malachi relates to the Meflias, the Jews very readily acknowledge. And that the Higheft \s a Name and Title of God, is as fure, as that the Name of Jehova is * Auguft. in loc. Magnum fuit, ut Dei Patris Verbum carne fua indutum utero geftaret. Magnum fuit, dum fe Ancillam con- fefifa eflet, ut Mater fieret fui Plafmatonis, I Dr. Clarke Script, Do£t. 2.d Edit, p, 72, the 250 Chrifl wor/hifd as God Ch. 1 1 . the proper Name of God ; for God is exprefly fo calfdbythe Angel, ver. 32. for there the Higheji and the Lord God are convertible Terms j and To they be ver.j6* the Highefl and the Lord. And thisanfwers to the Hebrew, JV^y Gnaljvin^ which is one of God's Names, and is render'd Gen. xiv. 18. The moft high God, and is fo render'd by the LXX. And our Saviour Chrifl calls God by that Name, Luke vi. 35/ as does St. Stephen, Ads vii. 48. where he fpeaks of God that dwelt in the Temple, which, as I fhow'd before, was Chrifl. But betides -this, Zach arias calls Chrifl by the Name of the Day-Spring from on High, which in the Original is dvcflohn If $4*$, The Day-Spring from on High, ver. 78. Here we mutt obferve that the He- brew Word riQy fignifies both to arife and to grow ; and that thence the feveral Texts which Zacharias alludes to, are federally render'd, as Malachi iv. 2. Unto you that fear my Name JhaU the Sun of Right eouf* nefs arife with healing in his Wings ; where Chrifl is call'd T-ipT* E>Et£> the Sun of Righteoufnefs, and by Jeremiah ch. xxiii. v. a righteous Branch, n£2? p>*13? Germen Juftutn : and Zech. Hi. 8. My Servant the Branch ; and Zech. vi. 12. Behold the Man -whofe Name is Branch, he JhaUgrow up out of his Place, and he JhaU build the Temple of the Lord. Now from the double meaning of the original Word, the Seventy have render a all thefe Places by civcLTOhii, which fignifies the rifing, and is gene- rally us'd for the rifing of the Sun. But we mufl remember there is a rifing from the Earth alfo, as well as from Heaven * ; fo whether we render by * Eft cLVct\ohr, ttyfi, aeque ac dvctlohh *cp* : So Ezek. xvi. 7. KctOcy? » sivcLJohii tk &yw, as the Bud of the Field ; and Ezek. xvii. 10. 20V ra (6'qKq aWJoKik cCv\7)i fy)£#.v$Mila.i, It fhall wither in the Furrow where it grew. the Ch. 1 1 . before his Refurrefiion. 2 5 1 the one or the other, the meaning is all one, that Jefus Chrift is the Perfon here fpoke of, the Mefliah. And fo the Cbaldee Verfion paraphrafes the Text of Zech. vi. 12. Behold the Man whofe Name is Meffiah, he will be reveal 'd, and he (hall be magnified, and he (hall build the 'Temple of the Lord. And that both thefe Denominations, whether Day-Spring or Branch, re- late to Chrift's Divinity, is plain, becaufe it is hid to be from on High, as a Sun to enlighten the mi- ferable World, he came from Heaven ; and as the Branch of the Almighty Father, the eternal Son of the eternal God, he came to build the Temple of the Lord. It is obferved by Aben Ez,ra, that this Word Branch is what buds forth from under- neath it felf, from its very felf ,• and fo is moft admi- rably adapted to exprefs the Identity of the Divine Nature, that he is in very deed the true and real Son of God*. And here we muft remember, that the Jews were wont to call Children by Branches, as we do by Offspring. And the Cavil of the Arians, that Chrift might come from Heaven, and not be the Son of God, but made in Heaven, is fully anfwer'd in thefe Words : for avat^chv never CigniRes to be made, or to be created, but to arife ,• and the other Word, HBtf never fignifies to be made or created, but to grow, to fhoot-forth, to arife, to increafe |, which has relation to his Divine Nature from on High ; and as he is cail'd the Branch of David, to his In- carnation here below. Upon the whole, therefore, it appears that Za- charias knew that Chrift was God, and in this An- them of Praife adores him as fuch. * Aben Ezra Germen, quod de fubter fe germinabit V^ND ex femetipfo. Witfii cecon. p. 133. f Buxtorf. Lex. p. 651. Elizabeth 2 5 % Chrifl worflip'd as God Ch. 1 1 , Elizabeth ivorfiip'd Chrift as God. That Elizabeth the Wife of Zacharias and Mother of John the Baptift, had the fame knowledge of Chrifl as the Son of God, and ador'd him as God, is evident from Luke i. 41. where we find that by Revelation fhe knew that the Virgin Mary was with Child, and that of no lefs Perfon than her Lord, whence fhe call'd Mary the Mother of my Lord ; and it is there faid, that fhe was fill'd with the Holy Ghoft, which infpir'd her with the Knowledge of Mary's Conception, and that the Child fhe bore was the Son of God, the Jehova, the Lord the Saviour. The Mother of my Lord; this Expreflion is very like that of Jefu Sirach, Eccl. li. 10. I calf d upon the Lord, the Father of my Lord ; and that of David, The Lord faid unto my Lord, Pfal. ex. 1. by which Ex- preflions Chrifl: is call'd God. And fo Elizabeth by the fame Expreffions lignifies her Belief, that the Child to be born of Mary was God, according to what the Angel had faid, ver. 35. He foal/ be calt'd the Son oj God* The Magi, or wife Men, worfiip'd Chrift as God. The Hiftory of the wife Men we have Matth. 2. It is not material to my prefent Purpcfe, to examine who, or what, thefe wife Men were, or from what Country they came ; but only to fhew r that they worfhip'd the Child Jefus, not as a Man, nor as a Prince, but as the eternal God * For when we confider the Revelation thefe wife Men received, we mud believe they had fome 0- ther Guidance than the Star j for that Star could * See Spanheini Dub. Evang. p. 2. Dub. 48. Sir Thomas Herbert, p. jij, 224. New Memoirs of Literat. 1725. Vol. 2. p. 61. not Ch. 1 1. before his RejiirreEtion. 253 not guide them to Jerusalem, nor endue them with courage to enquire after a new-born King at the Court of a jealous Prince, a Prince fo jealous that he deftroy'd mod of the royal Line not long before for fear of a Competitor : doubtlefs they had fome other Revelation, and that was, that this new-born King was the Son of God. For if thefe wife Men look'd on this Child only as the King of the Jews, what was that to them ? Whether they were Perfians or of any other Nation, what Benefit could they expect from a new-born Child ? Did they court his Favour in hopes of his future Reign ? The Circumftances of this Child, the Poverty of his Parents, the Stable and Manger, would foon have (if not difgufled, yet) diffuaded them from making any farther court to him, that was fo unlikely to be a Prince, and who feem'd fo very remote from being a Monarch ; and they, if wife Men, would never have expos'd themfelves to ridicule and fcorn, for worfhipping fuch a Child for a Prince, that wanted the Comforts, and even the NecefTaries of Life*. It is plain therefore that thefe wife Men, whoever they were, look'd beyond the prefent Circumftances, and beheld in that Babe a Majefty beyond that of terrene Princes, beyond that of Mortals, a Splendor and Glory of the Son of God, for which they ador'd him. It was indeed the Cuitom of the Perjians to adore their Princes ; but this Child was neither among them, nor their Prince : And then we muft farther obferve, that the Perfians never found their Princes in fuch (hocking, fuch deplorable Poverty ; but thefe Perfons came from their own Homes, a great Journey, to do homage to one unknown to them, to a Foreigner, to one concerning whom they had fome Revelation from Heaven ; and therefore could * Athanafius 1. de Incarnat. not 2 54 Chrijt And as Simeon feems to figniry that thefe Pro- phecies are fulfilled in Chrift, fo no doubt but he believed that Chrift to be fuch an one, as thofe Prophets defcrib'd him, xhe Emmanuel; and therefore * Sueton. Vit. Vefpafian c. 4. Tacit. Hift. 1. 5. c. 13. It was the conftant Opinion, that it was in the Fates, that about Vefpajian's time, there mould arife from Judea, thofe who mould obtain the Empire of the World. he 1)6 Chrtjt worjbip'das God Ch.xi* he calls him God's Salvation, that Salvation which was prepared for all the World, and therefore his Salvation alfo, which he could not have hoped from him as a Man, but as the living God. Maldonat* has admirably well obferv'd, that this Faith of Simeons was fo Angularly great, that it ought to be admir'd, fo great that even at the firft fight of this Child, when yet in his fwaddling Clothes, he knew and declar'd that he was given for Salvation to the Gentiles, as well as the Jews ; which was far more than Peter himfelf fully believ'd, even after he- had feen and heard Chrift, after he had heard him fay, / have other Sheep which are not of this Fold, them alfo I mufl bring ; nay, even after the VeiTel was let down to Peter from Hea- ven, Atlsx. 11,14. he fUll doubted, he ftagger'd, he could not well underftand how that Salvation, which their MefTias was to obtain, fhould be com- municated to the Gentiles* And therefore the Faith of this old venerable Man in Chrift, as God, as Saviour, and as the Saviour of the whole World, is very greatly to be extoll'd and highly ad- mir'd. Anna worfiipp'd Chrift as God. That Anna worfhip'd Chrift as God, we have moft certainly, tho very briefly related by St. Luke, ch.iu 3<5. where he firft fpeaks of the excellent Piety of this Woman, and tells us that (lie was a Prophetefs ; and then fays that fhe gave thanks unto the Lord for Chrift, which Simeon at that time em- brac'd, and join'd her Thankfgiving with his, and after f pake of him to all that looked for Redemption in Jerufalem ; that is, declar'd that this Chrift, as mean * Maldonat in Luc. \u ver. 3 r. Ed. Mentz 1 $ 1 1 ,■ as Ch. 1 1. before his Refurreflion. "257 as he then appear'd, was the Meffias, the Son of God. The Words of herTharik'fgiving, the Evan- gelift has not related ; and the reafon is believ'd to be, becaufe they were the fame, or near the fame with thofe of Simeon. John the Baptift worjhip'd Chrift as God. I come now to John the Baptift, who is call'd the Ending or Conclusion of the Mofaic Confuta- tion, and the Apparatus of the New Teftament; and I am very fure that he knew Chrift to be the Son of God, and worfliipp'd him as God. This John is a Man beyond all Exception '; for St. John the Evangelift fays of him, that he was exprefly fent by God.fr) bear wltnefs of [Chrift] the true Light, that all men through him might believe, John i. 7. What he therefore deliver'd, ought to be receiv'd as the moft facred Truth, fince he was commifTion'd as God's Envoy to bear witnefs con- cerning Chrift. This is he that came in the Spirit of Elijah, Luke i. 17. who was filled with the Holy Ghofl from his Birth, ver. 15. the Angel and Meffenger of God, to declare that the Meffias was at hand ; the bright Morning Star that fhone juft before the riling of the Sun of Righteoufnefs. That this John Baptift knew Chrift to be God, and worfhip'd him as fuch, appears from the Pro- phecy concerning him, and its accomplishment. Ifa.xl. 3. The Voice of Matth. iii. 3. This is him that crieth in the Wil- he that was fpoken of by dernefs, prepare ye the way the Prophet Ifaiah, faying, of the Lord [Jehova] make the Voice of one crying in ftrait in the Defart a high the Wildemefs, prepare ye way for our God. the way of the Lord. S From 258 Chrtfi worjbipd as God Ch. 1 1. From this Prophecy it appears, that he /hould prepare the way of Jehova, and of God ; and in the Accomplishment it appears that he prepar'd the way for Chrift ; whence it neceftarily follows, that Chrift is that Jehova, that God : And he him- felf tells. us, Jobni. 23. that he is that Voice of one crying in the Wildernefs ; and applies that Prophecy to himfelf: And therefore when he, ver. 29. de- clares Chrift to be the Lamb of God, he alfo declares that fame Chrift to be Jehova&nd God. This further appears from the Teftimony he gave of Chrift, Jobni. 15. John bore witnefs of him, and cried, faying, This is he of whom If pake, he that co- meth after me, is preferred before me, for he ivas before me. Now ii we examine this Teftimony, we fhall find that it had no relation to his Birth, nor his Office, but to his divine Nature ; for the Evange- lift had all along before fpoke of Chrift as the Word, the eternal God, the Light and Life, and Author of the Creation. And now he proves it by the Teftimony of the Baptift, who faid that he was be- fore him; which muft therefore relate to that Priori- ty, whereby he made all things : And he confirms it further from ver. 16. as Chrift is the original Source of all BlefTing, which is God's Prerogative ; and that Prerogative is Chrift's alfo, for of his fulncfs we all receive Grace for Grace. At the 30th and fome following Verfes we find how Chrift was made known to John, namely, by Revelation from God the Father himfelf. This is he of whom I faid, after me cometh a man which is pre- f erred before me y for he was before me, and I knew him not; but that he jhould be made manifeft to Ifrael ; there- fore am I come baptising with Water. And John bare record, faying, I faw the Spirit defending from Heaven like a Dove, and it abode upon him, and I knew him not ; but Ch. 1 1. before his Refurreffion. 259 but he that fent me to baptise with Water, the fame faid unto me, Upon whom thou jhalt fee the Spirit defending and remaining on him, the fame is he •which baptiz,eth with the Holy Ghofl : And I faw and bare record that this' is the Son of God. In this Teftimony we have a mod admirable Proof that John the Baptift knew and worlhipp'd God in Trinity of Perfons ; and how was it pofti- ble otherwife, when he had fuch Revelation from God before Chrift was baptized, and fuch a full Demonftration at his Baptifm, where the Father bare Teftimony of the Son, %rU \ and that the Father loveth him ; and ver. 36. he requires Faith, Honour, and Obedience to that Son, in order to obtain eternal Life ; and declares the Penalty of denying that Worfhip and Obedience to that Son, to be no lefs than the Wrath of God. Upon the whole, it is 'manifeft that John the Baptift, who pointed to the Perfon of Chrift, faw him and knew him, and had the Honour to bap- tize him, and was a Delegate from God the Father, to tell all Men that this Chrift is the Meftias the Son of God, and to engage all Men to believe S 2 in i6o Chrtfi worfhip'd as God Ch. 1 1 ; in him, and honour and worfhip him as the Son of God, that he himfelf did adore him as God. Nathanael worjhip'd Chrifl as God. That Nathanael worfhip'd Chrifl: as God, is mod certain from John i. 49. Rabbi, thou art the Son of God, thou art the King of Ifrael. Now if we examine the Occafion or Reafon of thefe Words, we find it was, becaufe Nathanael per- ceiv'd that Chrifl had that Omnifcience which is God's Prerogative only; namely, to know things at a diflance, to know the Hearts of Men, and to fee in fecret. Thefe are not known by any na- tural Power, thefe are divine Prerogatives only ; and therefore finding that Chrifl had them, and be- ing greatly aftonifh'd, he concluded that he mud be a divine Perfon, and declared him to be the Son of God. It is not material to enquire what Nathanael did under the Fig-tree ,• whatever it was, it doubtlefs was fomething pleafing to God, and which had Chrifl 's Approbation. And from the Surprize Na- thanael was in, when he found that difcover'd, we may conclude they were fecret Prayers, which he poured out unto God, which none but God could know, and which declared Jefus to be the omni- fcient God, becaufe he knew them ; for any other Action might fome how or other be difcover'd, but fecret Prayers, filently offer'd to God, can only be known to that God to whom they are made ; they can only be known to that God who feeth in fecret. Befjdes this, Chrifl gave him further proof of his divine Nature, when he told him that he knew his very Heart, that he knew him to be a fincere Worfhipper, an Ifraelite indeed, in whom is no Guile , John i.47. And Nathanael knowing from Scripture a and Chap. 1 1 . before his Refurreffton. i6v and Reafon, that it is God only who knoweth the Hearts of the Children of Men, he rightly con- cludes this Jefus to be God ; and Chrift was fo far from contradicting him, that he promis'd him greater Difcoveries, to confirm him in that Faith he had now declar'd, namely, that Chrift was the Son of God. I muft only obferve more, that the Article S, both to the Son of God and to the King of Ifrael, fignifies that he meant that very Son of God, who was God by Nature, the eternal Son of the eternal Father ; and that very King of Ifrael, that Meffias, of whom Mofes in the Law and the Prophets had wrote ; that very Meflias of whom Philip fpake be- fore, for Philip's Words were remarkable, ver. 45. We have found him of •whom Mofes in the Law and the Prophets did write, Jefus of Nazareth the Son of Jofeph. And he tells this to Nathanael, as one well vers'd in the Scriptures, and who could not but from the Scriptures know that that Me/fias was God. The Blind Man worfiip'd Chrift as God. Altho we know not the Name of this blind Man who was cur'd by the Lord Chrift, yet we know perfedly well that he believ'd Chrift to be God, and worfhip'd him as God ,• for fo it is exprefly faid, John ix. 3$. Doft thou believe on the Son of God ? And he anfwered and faid, Who is he. Lord, that I might believe on him ? And Jefus f aid unto him, Thou haft both feen him, and it is he that talketh with thee. And he faid, Lord I believe : and he worjhipped him. That a wonderful Miracle was wrought upon him, he was fure, and had happily experienced, and he very well knew, that nothing but a divine Power could work fuch a Miracle : he therefore S 3 at z6 z Chr'tjl nvorfh'tpd as God Chap.i i. at firft concluded, that drift, had been a Prophet, \i. and afterwards that be was of God, ver. 35. And when Chrift further reveal'd himfelf to him, the Son of God, as the true God, he not only bclicv'd him (o to be, but accordingly woifhip'd him as fuch, h? jell down and ivorjhip'd him * he worfhip'd him with divine Honour ; for the fame Word is here us'd, as is eife where ufed, to fig- niry the Worfhip due to the eternal God only. li Would you know, fays St. Auflin\, what this iC Man believ'd Chrift to be? it is "eafily known, " far he fell dozvn and -xorjhip'd him." But of this (be before, p. 217. Martha w.Jhip'd Chrift as God. The Account of Marthas worshipping Chrift as God, we have at large, John ch. xi. from ver. 20* It feems that Martha's Faith was very weak be- Hie had this Intercourfe with Chrift ; and the antient Interpreters have concluded the Infirmity of her Faith from her faying, ver. 21. Lord, if thou n here, my Brother had not dyd 9 as if Chrift Id not as well have preferv'd him abfent as id from another Expreflion, ver. 22. / whatfoever thou wilt ask of Gcd r, intimating that fbe doubted of his own Power ; and thirdly, from her faying, ver. 24. '<;// rife again at the Rejurretiion, at , fignifying indeed her Belief of the Rel 1, but doubting whether Chrift was able to raife him now. She look'd upon Chrift as - l w rdinar) Mari, as a Prophet, as a Fa- , but did not yet believe him to he the Son of Gad, the very God of very God. Id Fr prodd&M ndor.ivit eum. t Auguft. r,. a.;. Vis vfderc qualcm credat J fc procidens am. But Chap. 1 1 . before his Refurreflion. 263 But after this happy Intercourfe, when Chrift. had reveafd himfelf more particularly to her, as the Refurreclion and the Life, as the Lord and Giver of Life, of Life temporal and eternal, ver. 25. then fhe alters her Expreflions, for then (he believ'd that he was God, not a nominal God, but the true eternal God, whofe Power only can, and Ayhofe Prerogative it only is to raife the Dead : for by thefe Words, / am the Refurreclion and the Life, our Lord difcover'd his divine Nature ; and upon that Revelation now made to her, (he imme- diately worships him as God, and fays, / believe that thou art the Chrift, the Son of God, that Jhould come into the World. And the Article is here alfo added to fignify that peculiar Son of God, that Saviour, who is the Emmanuel, God and Man \ and (he adds, \%y*\t&Mi that Jhould come into the World, to let Chrift know that fhe belie v'd him to be that very Meflias which God had promis'd, and that he was God and Man, as the Prophets had foretold. "the Apoftles worjhip'd Chrift as God before his Refur- reclion and Afcenfion. What the Apoflles taught of and preach'd to the World concerning this Jefus Chrift, I have fhown before, namely, that they have affirm'd him to be the true and eternal God, the Son of God, of the fame Nature and Divinity with God the Father. Thefe Apoftles, who had the honour of his Conver- fation, and were Witnefles of his Glory, and were call'd by him for this very Work of declaring his divine Nature to all the World, have raoft exprefly afferted in the ftrongeft Terms Words would al- low, that this Jefus Chrift is the eternal Son of the eternal Father. $ 4 This 264 Chrijl- wor/hip'd as Cod Ch. 1 ft This I have already (hown at large, when I prov'd that the Apoftles afcrib'd to this Jefus all the divine Names, which were the diflinguifhing Appellations of the fupreme God ; of the Father everlafling, whereby God is known and diftin- guifh'd from all created Beings ; and w r hen they have further afcrib'd to this Jefus all the divine Attributes, Operations and Wor/hip, which per- tains to the only and true God; and when they have called upon us to join with them in their Faith, and in the mod; folemn Adoration *. I am now to confider whether they worfhip'd him as God,- and it is moft certain they did. I know fome Writers have afl'erted, that the Apoftles call'd Chrift the Son of God, which was a convertible Term with that of Mefliah ; and that they look'd upon him as their Lord and their Matter, but not as their Lord and God ,• and that therefore they did not worfhip him until his Afcen- fion into Reaven, but before that never f . - But I mutt profefs my felf of a different Opi- nion. Is it poflible that they could confefs him to be the Son of the living God, and not wor- fhip him > The very Apprehenfion of God's Ap- pearance, ftrikes all Men into the mo ft folemn Worfhip and Adoration; and could the Apoftles converfe with him, fee his Miracles, hear his di- vine Difcourfes, and be Witneffes to his holy Life, and pay him only civil Honour, when fo many not call'd to that peculiar Intimacy with him, had ador'd him as God before ? I fay, this is not likely, it furpaffes all Belief. When St. John fays, We beheld his Glory, the Glory as of the only- begotten of the Father, when Pe- ter % James and John had feen his Transfiguration, * See before, c. 5. p. 29. f Maldonat in Luke xxiv. and Ch.ii. before his Rejurretfion. i6 ^e Chrift, o tifis y t» 2>££. Sed cum uno Articulo t« conjungat & dictionem n 2,co\y£js, aperte demonftrat utrumq-, Epithetum ad Chriftum efTe referendum. Zanch. de trib. Elohim, 1. v. c. 4. § 8. p. 234. in \ a 270 Chriji wor/bip'd as God Ch. 1 1 „ in Grace, and in the Knowledge of our Lord and Saviour Jefus Chrift, to him be Glory both now and for ever : the Original is more expreffive, $riv & fai^ dime;, both now and to the Day of Eternity ; as he is the eter- nal God, fo Glory and Honour "is to be afcrib'd unto him to all Eternity, Amen. Thomas wcrfiifd Chrift. as God. When Chrift in a moh: merciful Companion to Thomas his Unbelief, had convine'd him, that it was he himfelf that fpake to him, that he was really rifen from the dead, Thomas cry'd out, my Lord and my God, John xx. 28. Our Adverfarys have often, tho in vain, endea- vour'd to elude the force of thefe Words, as if they were Words of Amazement, or an Exclamation thro* fear, and not a folemn Adoration and Wor/hip. But that they are a mod folemn and religious Adoration, is plain, becaufe Thomas could not be at that time in any great Surprize; for he had heard before that Chrift. was rifen from the dead, and that he had already appear'd to many before, whereby the edge of the Surprize muft neceffarily be worn off. Had Chrift indeed appear'd to him firft of all, and unlook'd for, then there had been fome more ground for fuch a Conflrudion ; but we find ver. 25. that the Difciples had told him that they had feen Chrift, and that he h'ad vouchfafed to fhew them his Hands and his Side; and therefore they thereby gave him fome hopes that he might fee him too, and arm'd him againft all Surprize. Befides, St. Thomas's Words to Chrift are a direct Anfwer to our Lord's reproof, Be not faithlefs but belieying^ ; and thereupon he faid, my Lord and my God, which is as much as if he had faid, Lord I am not faith- Ch. u. before his Refw retfion. 271 faithlefs, I do believe, and thy Mercy has con- vinced me in a lingular manner that thou art my Lord and my God ; he faid not, Lord I am con- vinc'd that thou art he, and that thou art really arifen from the Dead, but he faid, My Lord and my God, confefTing that he muft be God in very deed who could raife himfelf from the Dead ; and thereupon our Saviour fays, Thomas, lecaufe thou haft feen me thou haft believed, bleffed are they that have not feen and have believed : namely what ? that Chrifh is rifen from the Dead ? yea verily : but that is not all, but this alfo, as St. John tells us, ver. 31. That J ef us is theCbrift % the Son of God, and that believing ye might have Life in his Name. Befides, the Words are the very form of Adora- tion ufed by Mufes and the Prophets, Jehova is our God ; which Word Jehova being render'd by Lord, Thomas, upon this wonderful Conviction, adores him as his Lord and his God. Neither is the Conftru&ion of the Words con- trary to this Explication ; for the nominative Cafe is fometimes put for the vocative in other Texts of Scripture as well as this, as John xix. 3. y&. * Dean Prideaux'j Life of Mahomet, p. 62. Ch. 13. from Adwrfaries. 281 ^ l * be lawful to call him " a Man, for he did many Miracles, and was a " Teacher of thofe who do receive the Truth with " Gladnefs, drawing many after him both Jews . 35, &c. f Mr. Bingham'/ Chriftian Antiquities, Book x. c. 4. neceffary 2 88 Chri/t's Z)ivintty provd Gh. 14, neceffary Article of Faith, before the Council of Nke^ which was held Anno 325. for there they will find that there was not one fingle one wherein ic is not only an Article, but the principal Article; But I muft tell you that Socinus himfelf denies this Charge || \ for he fays, That neither he nor his Aflbciates ever aflerted, that the Writers before the Council of Nice were of his Opinion. I will give you a /hort Account of them fo far as re- laces to our purpofe. The firft Creed is of Irenaus, who flourinYd Anno 179, in which are thefe Words : 4< The Church, 1 believe alfo the €t Holy Ghoft, who exifb to all Erernity." The fourth is part of an antient Creed of 7lr- tullians, who liva Anno 192 : tc There is one Rule " of Faith only which teaches us to believe ■ - And I am " baptiz'd into the Holy Ghoft, that is to fay the cc Comforter, which wrought effe&ually in all the in thefe Words : " I " believe in one only true God, the Father Al- I begin with the Liturgy of Clemens* which is alfo call'd the Liturgy of tne twelve ApoftleSj diaated by them and wrote down by Clemens*; but tho this feems extravagant, rlv.e is no duubt but this Liturgy is very antient, and perhaps the oldeft written Liturgy which has been tranfrr.it red to us t> and was, as Renaudotius acknowledges, wrote before the Council of Nice |] ; ;:nd therefore the more fit to give us an Account of the Worfhip paid to Chrifl; at that time. This Liturgy begins thus : ct The Grace of A.1- fe«yd down thy moft t£ Holy Spirit, even the Lord and Giver of Life, 4 Chftft's divinity provd Ch. 15. learn from its being us'd both by the orthodox Patriarchs of Alexandria? and the Coptites, or the Followers of Diofcorus the Patriarch of that Church, who was condemn'd by that Council, and who from that time to this have continu'd to hold diftincl: Communions, and to have different Bifhops of the fame Diftri&s, and who after that time would not receive any new Rites the one from the other ; both of them pretending to flick to the antient Rites of that Church, ufed there be- fore their Separation : and therefore if either of them had added any thing afterwards to their com- mon Liturgy, "the other would not have folio w'd them therein, but that Addition would have be- come a farther Article of Divifion betwixt them. That this Liturgy was compil'd for the Ufe of the Churches of Egypt particularly, appears from that Patfage in the general Interceflion, Raife the Waters of the River to their jufl Height ; for there is no Country in which the Greek Language was ever us'd, that is annually overflow'd by a River as Egypt is by the Nile ; and they have reafon to pray that thofe Waters may flow to their juft meafure, becaufe if they exceed or fall fliort, they caufe a Dearth in that Country. Now let us fee how Chrift was worfhip'd by this Liturgy. 7*he Prieft begins the Anaphora or Offertory. tc It is very meet, right, holy and becoming, " as well as profitable to our Souls, to fing Praifes, and looking up to thee his " Father, but our God and the God of all, he cc gave thanks, he bleffed, he fanctified, and brake " it and gave it to them, faying, Take, eat. c< In like manner he took the Cup, — and lo'ok- " ing up to Heaven to thee his Father, but our a God and the God of all, he gave thanks, he " blefled, he filled it with the Holy Ghoft, gave 16. pray d daily to Chriji. 315 The Evening Doxohgy. Praife the Lr d, ye Servants, O praife the cc Name of the Lord ; we praife thee, ve laucf || thee, we blefs thee for thy great Glory, O Lord || and King, the Father of Chrift, the unfpotted J Lamb that taketh away the Sin of the World, || Ali Praifes, and Hymns, and Glory, are juftly ^ rendered unto thee, our God and Father, by thy Son, in the rnoft Holy Spirit, for all Ages, World without end. Amen. Lord, now letted thou thy Servant depart in || Peace, according to thy Word ; for mine Eyes || have feen thy Salvation, which thou haft pre- | c par'd before the Face of all People, to be a fraifing God in the fame Voice with thofe who have gone before us : which (hews how early thefe Doxo- Jogies, to Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft, have been tis'd in the Chriflian Church. And the fame Bafil fays, that the Practice of ufing the common Do.xo- Iogv, Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, and to the fiolyGhofly now and for ever ', World without end, was univcrfal ,* and that Firmilianus^ (who liv'd Anno 233) Mcktius, (who liv'd Anno 360) and theEaftern Chriftians, agreed with them in the ufe of it ; and (o did all the Weftern Churches from lllyricum to the World's end. And this he fays was by an immemorial Cuftom of all Churches, and of the greateft Men in them ; nay more, he fays it has been continued in the Churches from the time the Gofoel had been receiv'd among them. There was indeed fome fmall difference in the ufe of this Hvmn, which made no Difpute amongft Catholicks till the rife of the Arian Herefy : The Catholicks were us'd to fay, fome, Glory be to the Father t and to the Son, and to the Holy Ghoft ; others, Glory be to the Father, and to the Son, with the Holy Ghoft j and others, Glory be to the Father, in or by %he Son, and by the Holy Ghoft. Now all thefe ways were allow'd, while no Heterodox Opinions were faXpeded under them ; but when Arius had broach'd Jits Herefy, and his Followers would ufe no other poxoio'gy but the laft, to fignify that the Son and Holy Ghoft were inferior to the Father in Sub- ftance, and as Creatures of a different Nature from him, from that time the Orthodox thought it fcan- Ch. 17- from the fDomlogies. 327 fcandalous, and it brought any one under Suspi- cion of Herefy to ufe it, becaufe the Annas had now made it the diftinguifhing form of their Party, Gregory Thaumaturgus, Bifhop of Neucafarea in Cappadocia, a moft admirable Man, who d> d Anno 265, ufed it thus, Glory to God the Father, and Son, with the Holy Ghofl : but then this mud be under- flood according to his fenfe, which was very or- thodox ; for in that Confeffion of Faith which was preferv'd in the Church of Neocafarea, he owns a perfett Trinity in Glory, Eternity and Power without Separation cr Diver fry of Nature ; on which Dodrine his form of Doxology was grounded. Which St. Bafil following, Exceptions were taken againft it ; for the Followers of Aetius the Here- tick, who liv'd Anno $60, took advantage from thefe Expreffions to infer a Diffimilirude in the Son and Holy Ghofl: to the Father. But St. Bafil takes a great deal of pains to (hew the Impertinency of thefe Exceptions ; for he proves from the Scrip- tures an Equality of Honour to be due to them, and efpecially from the form of Baptifm. Upon the whole, whatever difference there was in the Expreffion, whatever Addition was made to it by the Latin Church *, all the Churches agreed in this, that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft, were of the fame divine Nature, and were to be honour'd with equal Glory, Praife, Honour and Adoration. * See Forbes Hiftoric. Theolog. Difcourfes, 1. 1. c, 22. De- fences of the Bificp of London'; Letter to the Clergy, Anno 17 19. CHAP, 3*8 Englifli Liturgy vindicated Ch.18. CHAP. XVIII. The Liturgy of the Church of England de- fended from the Charge of favouring Aria- jxifm and Socinianifin. S^tK EFORE I leave this Head, I find my felf wjjjjjg oblig'd to vindicate the Liturgy of the c*CU3y& Church of England from the faife Afper- fions of one of her degenerate Sons, who has charg'd it, as if it was compos'd to favour Arianifm and Socinianifm ; for fo his Words are *, that the main Eranches of his own Doctrine are expreily affirm'd in our Liturgy. A heavy Charge ! but if it be falfe, it is a grie- vous Calumny, and falfe it is in the higheft degree ; And To it will appear to every honeft and conscien- tious Reader, in fpite of ail Arian or Socinian Slan- ders. Our Liturgy declares for one God mofl afiuredly, but alfo for three Perfons in the Unity of the divine Ma jefly. Our Liturgy addrefles our Prayers to the only one God the Father, inclufive of the Son and Holy Ghoft, but does not addrefs her Devotions to the Father excluding the Son and Holy Spirit, Our Church does teach a Subordination of Order, bur not a Subordination of Nature : Our Church does not look upon the Son and Holy Spirit as Creatures, * &ripwe Doflrmc, p, 37?, firji Edit* but Ch. 1 8. from Arianifm, &c. 329 but adores them with the Father, as the one only e- ternal fupreme God. What Front muft we then judge fuch Men of, that dare fo falfely to accufe our Church, as favouring Arianifm or Socinianifm ! Any unbyafs'd Perfon would rather judge, that it had been compofed in full oppofition to thofe Herefies, being full of Ex- preflions that are contrary to them, and muft necef- farily overthrow them; for there is not one Form or Office of the Church wherein Chrift is not directly and perfonally invoked. For of eighty four Collects for Sundays and Holy- days, there are eighteen that end in thefe Words, " Thro' our Lord Jefus Chrift, who liveth and u reigneth with thee and the Holy Ghoft, now u and ever, Amen.' Or thus, Thro' our Lord " Jefus Chrift, who liveth and reigneth with thee " and the Holy Spirit ever one God, World with- " out end.— Or elfe in thefe Words, To whom ** with thee and the Holy Ghoft be all Honour " and Glory, World without end, Amen." And one, that on Trinity Sunday, is direfrly ap- propriated to vindicate the Doctrine of the holy Trinity ; and two of the Collects, the third Sun- day in Advent and St. Stephen, are directly addrefs'd to Chrift : And the reft end in thefe Words, Thro* Jefus Chrift, thy only Son, our Lord ,• or thro' Jefus Chrift our Lord and Saviour ; or thro' the Merits and Mediation of Jefus Chrift our Lord, Amen. Is there any thing like favouring Arianifm or So- cinianifm in thefe Expreflions ? God forbid, they are the moft contrary to it. Every Sunday and Holy-day in the Year, the Creed of the Council of Nice, An. 325. held again ft the Avians, and compofed by that Council againft the Art an Herefy, is repeated at Morning-Service. Thirteen times in the Year the Creed, commonly call'd the Athanafian Creed ('tis no matter by whom compofed, 3 ) o Englifh Liturgy vindicated Ch. 1 8. compofed, fo it be orthodox^ that Stumbling-block and Rock of Offence to Avians and Socinians, is publicklv repeated in our molt folemn Devotions. Every Day in the Year we ufe the Doxology, and give Glory to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Koiy Ghoh ; and after the firft LeiTon every Morning, ve blefs God in that remarkable Hymn e Anrienrs call'd Te Deum. After having given Glory to the Father ever- lafibg, we adore the Son and Spirit, and fay, rch thro cut all the World does acknowledge thee, the Father cf an infinite Majefly, thine honourable, S ;:, alfo the Holy Gbofi .the Comforter. And then we addrefs our (elves to Chrifl : 7%ou art the King cf Glory, Chrifl, thou art the everlafl- - tbt Father thou fitteft at the Right- Hand cf G. d iu rhe Gl ry of the Father. Nay, we not recognize his Divinity, but we orrer our Prayers and Supplications to him directly : We be- :." to be our Judge, we- there- thy Servant? whom thou haft re* wkk th\ : Blood. And all that fol- lows of that glorious Hymn is directly ofter'd to C And cur Service is concluded with the Apofto- lical Bleffing, 2 Co*, xiii. 14. where Chrift and the Holy Gbofl are equally invok'dasGod the Father. Of the Litany. Every Sunday, U . and Friday thro'out the fear, that admirable Form of Prayer call'd the Litany, or general Supplication, is us'd ; which, r it was compos'd by Mvnercus, Bifhop of J' . :, about Ar.no 600, or by Gregory the Great about the fame time, matters not. This Litany, fach as it is, and as our Church has received it, is a moft excellent Form, urongly expreifing our 3 Faith Ch.i 8. from Arianifm, &c. 3 ? 1 Faith in the holy Trinity, and worfhipping Chriit and the holy Spirit in Words fo auguft and fub- lime, and fo direct and pofirive, as cannot be exceeded by any Form. It begins with the mod folemn Invocation : O God) the Father of Heaven, have Mercy upon us miferable Sinners, O God the Sen, Redeemer of the World, have Mercy upon us miferable Sinners. God the HA) Ghoft, proceeding from the Father and the Sen, have Mercy upon us miferable Sinners. O holy, bleffed and glorious Trinity, three Perfns and one God, have Mercy ufon us miferable Sinners. Then all the Deprecations, Supplications, and Interceffions, are directly made to thrift ; for the very firft Deprecation is made to Chrift, and all that follow to the fame Perfon. Remember not, Lord, our Offences ^ nor the Offences of cur fore* fathers, neither take thou Vengeance of our Sins ; fpqre us good Lord, fpare th) People whom thou haft re- deemed with thy mop precious Elccd, and be not angry with us for ever. Spa .{Lord. Now this is plain to a Demonstration, that Chriit is here moft particularly acdrefs'd to, thro' ail thefe Supplications and Prayers ; for thelnterce::-. a is made thro' thy I. •, thy Nativity, .- and Paffon, th Death and Re '. ■-:":. '... a A .. And becaufe Chrift was not nam'd Gcd in this firft Deprecation, he is directly calfd fo in the : Supplication: We Sinners do befeech thee to ■'. . . O Lord God, and that it ?nay pleafe thee to r govern th) Church :! in the i fgbt way. And we end all our Prayers and Petitions thus: Son of Gcd we befeech thee to hear us. Lamb of Gcd tl .: takeft avay the Sins of the World, grant us thy Peace. Lamb of Gud that takeft away the Sins of the World, ; us. Q Chrift hear us,' lard have Mercy 3 1 z Englifli Liturgy vindicated Ch. i 8. Mercy upon us. Chrift have Mercy upon us. Lord hav* Mercy upon us. And then, after we have addrefs'd our felves to God the Father, and given Glory to the Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft, we again fpealc to Chrift. in thefe Words : F.om our Enemies defend us, O Chrift, graciou fly look upon our Afflictions, pitifully behold the Sorrows of our Hearts, mercifully j or give the Sins of thy People, favou- rably with Mercy hear our Prayers ; O Son of David have Mercy upon us ; both now and ever vouchfafe to hear us, O Chrift ', graciou fly hear us, Chrift, gracioufly hear us, O Lord Chrift ; O Lord let thy Mercy be /hewed upon us, as we do put our truft in thee. Among the occafional Prayers, that in the time of Death and Famine ends thus, For the Love ofjefus Chrift our Lord, to wliom with thee and the Holy Ghoft y be all Honour and Glory now and for ever* And the general Thankfgiving us'd daily, ends in thefe Words : Thro 9 Jefus Chrift our Lord, to whom with thee and the Holy Ghoft, be all Honour and Glory, World •without end. Amen. Now for any Man to charge our Liturgy with favouring Arianifm or Socinianifm, is fuch an amazing Confidence, an Afiiirance that carries fo much Falf- hood with it, that one might hope no one who calls himfelf a Chriflian could be guilty of it. The Order for the Adminiftration of the Lord's -Supper, or holy Communion* The fecond Collect ends, Thro 9 Jefus Chrift our Lord, who, with thee and the Holy Ghft, liveth and reigneth ever ove God, World without end* And in the Exhortation, the Trinity of Perfons, and the Divinity of Chrift, is expreiVd in thefe Words : And above all things, ye muft give mo ft humble and hearty Thanks to God the Father, the Son, I and Ch.i8. from Arianifm, &c. 33$ and the Holy Ghofi, for the Redemption of the World by the Death and Paffton of our Saviour Chrifl, both God and Man. To him therefore, with tte Father and the Holy Ghoft, let us give % as we are mofi bounden, continual Thanks - •" . r And on Trinity-Sunday the Preface is very exprefs. Who art one God, one Lord, not one only Per f on, but three Perfons in one Subflance; for that which we believe of the Glory of the Father, the fame we believe of the Son and of the Holy Ghofi, without any Difference or Inequality. Therefore, &c. And the laft Petition in the firft Poll- Commu- nion-Prayer is, We befeech thee to accept this our bounden Duty and Service, not weighing our Merits, but par- doning our Offences, thro' Jefus Chrifl our Lora lj b, -whom, and with whom, in the Unity of the Holy Ghofi, all Honour and Glory be unto thee, Father Almighty, World without end. Amen. The fecond alfo ends with giving Glory to the three Perfons of the Divinity, thro Jefus Chrifl our Lord, to whom, with thee and the Holy Ghofi, be aU Honour and Glory, World without end. Amen. And in the Euchariftical Hymn, after we have blefs'd God the Father Almighty, we addrefs the Son in thefe Words : O Lord) the only-begotten Son Jefu Chrift, O Lord God, Lamb of God, Son of the Father that takefi away the Sins of the World, have Mercy upon us. Thou that takefi away the Sins of the World, have Mercy upon us. Thou that takefi away the Sins of the World, receive oar Prayers. Thou that fitteft at the Right-hand of God the Father, have Mercy upon us : For thou only art holy ; thou only art the Lord; thou >only, Chrifl, with the Holy Ghofi, art mofi high in the Glory of God the Father. And the Benediftion is in the Name of God Almighty, the Father, the Son 7 and the Holy Ghofi. If this be favouring Arianifm or Socinianifm, then I believe it is impoffible for any Words to exprefs the 334 Englifli Litiirgy vindicated C\\.\% the contrary to thofe Herefies ; but if this be down-right Orthodoxy, as moft certainly it is, then it is no lefs than Diabolical Slander to charge our Liturgy with favouring them. The Office of publick Baptifm. Having (poke of Baptifm before, I (hall only ob- ferve, that in all the Prayers the three Perfons are diftin&ly nam'd and invok'd as divine, and the Form us'd in the very Words as deliver'd by Chrifi Jefus. And that the Prayers are directed to Chrift, is certain, becaufe it is faid in the "Exhortation, Te have prayd that our Lord Jefus Chrifi would vouch- fafe to receive him* The Catechifm. In the Catechifm there is particular Care taken to inftruft the Catechumen in the Faith of the Holy Trinity ; for in the fixth Qiieftion it is de- manded, What do you chiefly learn in thefe Articles of thy Belief? And the Anfwer is : Firft, / learn to believe in God the Father, who has made me and all the World. Secondly, In God the Son, who has redeemed me and all Mankind. Thirdly, In God the Holy Ghofiy who fantlifieth me and all the elecl People of God. The Order of Confirmation* The fecond Coll eel: ends thus : Thro 9 our Lord Jtfut Chrifi , who, with thee and the Holy Ghofi, liveth and reigneth ever one God, World without end, Amen. And the Bleffing is in the Name of God Almighty, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghofi. The Ch.i8. from Arianifm, &c. 335 The Form of Solemnization of Matrimony. In this Form, the joining the Man and Woman is faid to be done in the fight of God ; and when the grand Efpoufal is made by the Delivery of the Ring, it is made in the Name of the Father , and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghofl. And the Pronunciation made by the Minifter, of their being lawfully marry'd, is made in thefe Words: I pronounce that they be Man and Wife to- gether, in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghofl. Amen. And the Benedi&ion then immediately added, runs thus : God the Father, God the Son, God the Holy Ghofl, blefs, preferve^ and keep you, &c. And then Chrift is invok'd for Mercy. The Order for the Vifitation of the Sick. The very firft Prayer is offer'd dire&Iy and per- fonaily to Chrift : Remember not. Lord, our Iniquities? nor the Iniquities of our Fore-fathers ; fpare us good Lord, fpare thy People whom thou haft redeemed with thy mofl precious Blood, and be not angry with us for ever. And all the Verficles before and after the Lord's Prayer, feem to be directed to Chrift, becaufe Chrift is direc"tly nam'd in one of them. And the Abfolution is pronounc'd in the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghofl. And the Authority of Chrift is declared as the God that forgiveth Sins in the very form. And in the Prayer after Abfolution the three Perfons are recogniz'd and invok'd. In the Prayer for a fick Child we have this Con- clusion : Grant this^ O Lord, for thy Mercy fake, in the fame thy Son our Lord Jefus Chrifl, who liveth and reigneth I $6 Engliih Liturgy vindicated Ch.i S\ reigneth with thee and the Holy Ghoft ever, one God, World without end, Amen. And in the Prayer for Perfons pad hopes of Recovery, the Father, Son, and Holy Ghoft are acknowledg'd ; and the Mercy of the Father, and the Merit and Mediation of the Son, and the Grace of the Holy Spirit, are particu- larly pray'd for. The Order for the Burial of the Dead. This Office begins with a Text which expreffes the Divinity of Chrift in the fuileft manner ; and when they come to the Grave, the Prayer is imme- diately addrefs'd to Chrift. Tet, O Lord God moft holy, O Lord moft mighty, O holy and moft merciful Saviour, deliver us not into the bitter Pains of eternal Death* Thou knoweft Lord, the Secrets of our Hearts ; Jhut not thy merciful Ears to our Prayers, but fpare us Lord moft holy, O God moft mighty, O holy and merciful Sa- viour, thou moft worthy Judge eternal, fuffer us not at our la ft Hour, for any Pains of Death, to fall from thee. The Thanhfgiving of Women after Child-Birth* In this Form, befides the Doxologies, Chrift is particularly invoked for Mercy, Chrift have Mercy upon us> And fo in the Commination* TheDoxology is afcrib'd to the three Perfons, and Chrift is particularly invoked for Mercy. From what has been faid, it appears that no Liturgy in the World ever was or could be penn'd more contrary to the Arian and Socinian Herefies, rhan this of the Church of England* No Liturgy gives Ch. i 8. from Arknifm, &c. ^tf gives more Glory to the blelTed Tnnity, and ac- knowledges the three Perfons in the Unity of the divine Ma/efty, plainer or more open than this. What mud we think then of fuch Men who chlrge her fo falfly, to ftrengthen their own Caufe? The/ may deceive the Unwary, but any that can hear and fee mud foon rind the Falfity of fuch a Ciarge, and fo the Slander becomes an aggravated Sin to their Herefy. Father forgive them, for they conjtder not what they do. Lord Jefusy lay not this Sin to their Charge* A men* CHAP. 338 The Primitive Chrijlians Ch. 1 Jp iffi qp A c5> <^ A ^S ra \5> s& ^b c& w fit © © ^p © by whom be Glory to thee, with him, in the Holy Ghofl. What could thefe Martyrs mean by praying to Chrift in their Extremities, if they did not be- lieve him to be God, and of the fame divine Na- ture with the Father ? Can we fuppofe them guilty of fuch Stupidity, to lofe their Lives for not giving divine Honours to Creatures, and at the lame time to do it themfelves ? If they did not believe the Father, Son, and Holy Ghofl to be that one God, they were not only deceiv'd, but they acted inconfiftently with their own Principles, which no one will dare to affirm ,• for to be guilty of Idolatry, and to die to avoid Idolatry, can never be thought an Ad of a prudent or con- fidering Perfon. * Eufeb.Ecd. Hift. 1. 4. c. 1 5, CHAP. 34* msmsasmss^assm mrnmmmm$m CHAP. XX. The antient Chriftian Fathers ill-treated by the Socinians. MIGHT further prove the Divinity of 1 JH Chri/l, and the Worfhip paid him as the fupreme eternal God, from the Writings of the antient Fathers,' efpecially thofe who wrote before the Council of Nice ; but that having been already fo laborioufly done, I will rather refer the Reader to them. Hieronym.Zanchi del'rib. Elohim, \.$. c.8. p.249,&c. John HGQrnbeck's Confutation of Socinianifm, Utrecht Anno i6?o, 4*0. Vol. I. 1. 2. c. 5. p.39*» & c - Frederick Spanheim Hijior. Ecclef. 1701. Ley den* § 2. p. 6oj y &c. Dr. George Bull, Bifhop of St. Davids, his De- fence of the Nicene Faith, London 1721. FoL pub- lifh'd in Englijb, Anno 1724. Dr. Hancock, Arianifm not primitive Chriftianity. Samuel Gardiner againft Chriflofher Sands. Bifhop StiUingfleets Vindication of the Do&rinc of the Trinity, Anno 1697, London, p. 210, Sto. Mr. Bingham s Chriftian Antiquities, 1. 13. c.2. I cannot pafs by the Difefteem the Socinians have fhown to the antient Writers, and the fcurrilous Language they have given them, and how they magnify their Hxrejiarck, and glory in the Theo- logy, if it may be fo call'd, which he has broach'd to the World. Z 3 Sociuus 34* The ant tent Fathers Ch.20. Socinus fays, that a Heap of Teftimonies from the Fathers and Councils have no weight, efpe- cially againft us, fays he, who freely own that we differ from them *. And Smalcius goes far- ther, and fays, that the mod primitive Chriftians have had but very imperfect Knowledge of Reli- gion, and what they had was corrupted t : And Mr. Toland, that the Fathers were a damning Crew, and prone on the flighted: Occafions, fome- times for mere Punctilios of Criticifm or Chro- nology, to fend not only private Perfons, but even whole Societies, Churches and Nations a packing to the Devil ||. And as they run the antient Writers down, fo they extol Socinus as the greateft Man that ever liv'd, fecond to none for Knowledge of the Scrip- tures, that ever flourifh'd in the Church of Chrift **; and his Syftem as the mod valuable, and referv'd by a peculiar Providence of God to their times, which they hope will prevail over the whole Chrif- tian World, tho their Adverfaries rage againft it ft • * Socin. contr. Wiek. I. 7. c. 9. Autoritatum & Teftimonio- rum ex Patribus & Conciliis congeries nullas vires habet, pra?- fertim vero adverfum nos, qui ab iftis Patribus & Conciliis qu.t extant, nos diflentire non diffitemur. f Smalcius in Johan. hom. 7. Cogitamus Antiquiores Patres incidifTe in tempora jam corrupta, & in do&rinam Chrifti violatam & obfcuratam tenebris, quae ofFundi veritati tempore etiam A- poftolorum cceperant- Ideoque ficut veritatem non integram & fartam te&am a majoribus acceperant ; fie eriam integram defendere non poterant ; fed earn partem quas tradita illis fuerat, pro fua virili defenderunt. || Toland Nazaren. p. 60. Anno 171 8. ** Smalcius Refp. ad Smeglec. c. 22. Socinus, nulla re omni- bus quicunq; in orbe Chriftiano floruerunt, viris doctis & fa- crarum literarum peritis cedit. tf Smalcius Difp. 12. contr. Frantz. 1^14. Vere admirabilis eft ifta Theologia quam Deus noftris Ecclefiis, alto fuo concilio revelavit j & id propediem univerfo orbi Chriftiano, furiant quantum volunt, qui aliter fentiunt, innotefca* We Ch.20. hllnsA by the Socinians.- 343 We rather pray, that God will convert them from their Errors, and turn them from their A- poftacy to the Knowledge of their God and Sa- viour, that they may be faved ; and that he will keep his Church continually in his true Religion, the Faith of the mod holy Trinity ; and that he wou'd have Mercy upon thefe Hereticks, and take from them all Ignorance, Hardnefs of Heart, and Contempt of his Word. As to the Fathers fo much defpis'd by them, becaufe they are againft them, and as greedily catch'd at when they do but in the leaft feem to make for them ; thefe Fathers we honour as the faithful Servants of God, by whom the Gofpel has been tranfmitted to us, as faithful Evidences of the Identity of the Faith which we now profefs, as the noble Champions who have defended the Faith againft all the Agents of Satan, and triumphed againft the Powers of Darknefs. 4 CHAP. 344 Cbrijfs fDhtnity prov'd Ch. 21. CHAP. XXL The Tivinity and Worjhip of Chrift proved from the Obfervatiou of the Lord's-day. HAVE one thing further to obferre, and that is, that the fetting apart Lord's- day to the Honour of Jefus Chrift, and his publick Worfhip, in commemoru* tion of his glorious Refurre&icu from the Dead, and the tranflating the divine Worfhip from the feventh Day, or the Jevvifh Sabbath, to the firft Day of tne Week, is a full, an open, and folemn Acknowledgment of Chrift's Divinity. All the Days fet apart by the Heathen Nations to their feveral Gods were certainly idolatrous ; none before the coming of Chrift was confecrated to the Honour of the true God but the Jewifli Sabbath, and the Feafts of that Inftirution. Tnat thejey ifh Sabbath was of divine Inftitu- fcion we le*«rn from the Law, and the Obferva- tion was ei pin'd under a fevere Penalty ; whe- ther it was inftiruted in Paradife or in the Wil- dernefs, is nothing to our prefent purpofe. It was God that appointed it ; and chat God, I Ihow'd before, vzsjjfus Chrft, v ho was the God of the Jewifh Covenant, the God that ^ave the Law, the ycd thar dwelt in the Tabernacle and the Tem- ple : and thence Chrift is call'd the Lord of the Sah pom ohferwng the Lord's Z)ay. 545 lath, Match xii-8. *s the only Author and Infti- tor ck the Sabbath. And therefore, if this Chrift be not God, the eternal fapreme God with the Fa- tner and the Holy Spirit, then it is certain that the eternal fuprcme God never had, from the Crea- tion of the World to this very Day, any Day fet apart for his Honour or Worfhip : but all the Days have been fee apart and confecrated to Devils and Idols by the Heathen Nations ; and to a created Being, to a Creature, tho greatly exalted, by the Jews and Chriftians ; and the great God has been negle&ed by his own Creatures. But this is fo abfurd, that it would be down-right Mad- nefs to imagine it. CHAP. 346 Chrijfs Divinity provd Ch.2z CHAP. XXIL The ^Divinity and Worjhip of Chrift proved from the building and dedicating of Churches to Chriji as God. 9&M H E fame muft be faid of Temples and SMS Churches built to the Honour of Jefus Chrift y BaSl! that if this Jefus Chrift be a Creature, and not the eternal God, God has not had a Church, a Temple, an Houfe, or Edifice, erected to his Honour from the firft Day of the Creation to this time ; for the very firft Altars were ere&ed to Chrift, the firft Tabernacle was rear'd to Chrift, Solomons Temple was built to Chrift, the fecond Temple of Cyrus and Darius was built by the Pro- vidence of Chrift, and honour'd by the Prefence of Chrift ; and all the Chriftian Churches that have been built in every part of the World, were built to the Name and Worfhip of Chrift : whence they were call'd, 7» x Kvexcut* r nH oik&cl, God's Houfes, or the Lord's Houfes, by the Antients, and from them the Saxon Kyrich or Kirk, and the Scotch and Eng- UJb Kirk and Church to this Day. And Eufebius fays, that the Emperor Conft amine having built feveral Churches, gave them all the Name of KvactnAy as being dedicated not to the Honour of any Man, but to him who is Lord of the Uni- verfe *. * Eufeb. de Laud. Conftantc c. 17. So from Churches dedicated. Sec. 347 So that if Chrifl be not God, the great God has been moft deplorably negle&ed, and the Honour due to that adorable Being, has been beftow'd on 3 Creature ,• and the Earth, which is the Lord's, has not had an Houfe or Altar to the Honour of the blefled Creator. But this is alfo fo abfurd, that any one of common fenfe mud tremble at the Ab- furdity of it. CHAP. 348 -A Recapitulation. Ch.23. <^^^^^^^^^.^^^?^<>^§«* CHAP. XXIIL A Recapitulation* with a Catalogue of So- cinian Errors, Jfoewing the tendency of So- cinianifm to Turcifm. eH U S have I run thro' the Scriptures, and feen that Jefus Chrift the Son of God has been wonfhip'd as God in all the Ages of the Church, from Adam to the ApofHes, and from the Apoftles to this day. According as God gave greater Knowledge and clearer Revelation of his Son, the Adoration and Worfhip became greater and clearer. He was flrft worfhip'd as the Man Jehovah, the promis'd Seed; he was next worfhip'd as the Mamre, God the Word, who made vifible Appearances to the Patriarchs ; he was afterwards worfliip'd as the God of the Jews, the God of the Covenant. And the Pro- phets gradually knew and believ'd all the Articles of the Chrifuan Faith. And when the Fulnefs of time was come, God ivas manifefi in the F/efi, and believd on in the World, and ador'd as the great God, the Creator of Heaven and Earth, and the Sa- viour of Mankind. Neither did they worfhip this God blindfold ; the Reafon and Ground of Adoration has from time to time been reveaPd \ the Holy Spirit, which indited the Scriptures, has aflur'd Men that he is God by Nature, that he bears ail the Names of the only and true God, enjoys his Attributes, pofleflies Ch. 23. A Recapitulation. 349 poflefles his Powers, and all the A&s of God are afcrib'd to him. Such is the Foundation, and fuch is the Wor/hip becoming the great God, and that was accordingly paid him. I often think on the Words of Chrift, Search the Scriptures, for therein ye think to have eternal Life; and they are they which teflify of me, John v. 39. Now when we consider that when Chrift fpoke this to the Jews, the Old Teftament was only ex- tant, the New Teftament was not yet penn'd ; and that Chrift allures them that the Old was fuffi- cient to have taught them who he was, and what he was, whom they loo'k for as the Meffias, and that the Scriptures were fulfilled in himfelf, and that they might have had a Knowledge of him fufficient to have made them happy ; how much more Reafon have we to fearch the Scriptures, who have the New Teftament added to the Old, both as a Confirmation of the Truth, and as an Accomplifhment of the Promifes and Prophecies of the Old ? Thefe Scriptures, therefore, we ought to fearch ; for here we find Jefus Chrift not only promis'd as the Son of God, but declared to be the Son of God with Power, Rom. i. 4. By thefe Scriptures, therefore, we ftand, by thefe we abide, thefe are our Rule, we know no other, and thefe have given us fufficient Teftimonies, that this Jefus Chrift is the fupreme God, and that he ever was ador'd as the fupreme God : and if thefe do not convince us, they are fufficient and more than fufficient to condemn us. I ofcen think of that excellent Character St. Paul gives of the Bereans y in that they receivd the Word with all Readinefs of Mind, and fearch* d the Scriptures daily \ whether thefe things were fo, Acts xvii. 11. They were too wife to be impos'd upon, too prudent to take up any Doctrine, but what they found 3 5 o A Recapitulation. Ch* 2 j„ found confonanc with the holy Scriptures ,• and what, after due Examination, they found fo, that they receiv'd gladly, and embrac'd with Joy. We defire to follow their pious Example j God forbid we Chriftians fhould impofe a Doctrine which is not of God, or that we fhould receive any that has not God for its Author. We may examine our Faith, Chriftianity will bear the Teft of the niceft Scrutiny ,- nay, the more it be examin'd, the more its Truth, its Beauty, and its Luftre appears. I have, therefore, run thro' all the Difpenfations, and examin'd the Practice of all Ages, and have found that Chrift w as ftill the Object of Faith and Adoration ; and therefore we do, we muft receive him as our God and Saviour, lift up our Hands and Hearts, and bend our Knees to him as our God, and worfhip and adore him with Reverence and Awe, Refpect and Veneration, becoming him to receive, who is the great, eternal, fupreme God of Heaven and Earth. Let me add here the excellent Words of St. Chryfoflom : " When thou heareft of Chrift, do not honoureth \ not the Father which has fent him. As therefore this Proposition, That there is nei-. ther Precept nor Example for worfhipping Chrift as God in the holy Scriptures, is moft notorioufly falfe, a mod impudent Untruth ; fo the end of that Pro- portion is to root out Chriftianity, and deftroy the Chriftian Faith, to make Men de(pi(e their Sa- viour, and to introduce a kind of Mahometanifm in the Head thereof,- for that is the natural Con- fequence of fuch deteftable Premifes. I might draw a Parallel between the Mahometan Religion and the Socinian, and produce a Cloud o£ Witnefles to teftify that Socinianifm is only a more refin'd Turcifm, and that it tends towards intro- ducing the Religion of that grand Impoftor Ma- homet among us; but this has been already done by feveral \ and very lately by one of the French Nation, and printed at London in Englijh, Anno 17 12, to which I refer the Curious : the which may be alfo further prov'd from thofe noted Socinians, who have abjur'd Chriftianity, and turn'd Mahometans \\, * Hotting. Difput. de confenfu Socinianifmi & Mahumedifmi. Andraeas Proteus Mahometologia Socinlana, Leipf Anno 16*5. || Reflections on Mahometanifm and Socinianifm added to Re- land'; Doilrine of the Mahometans, N° IV. London 17 12. But 351 A Catalogue of Ch.ij., But that fame Author having gfein fome Initanees of fuch unhappy Apoftates alfo, I fhall conclude this V/ork with la\ ing before you a Catalogue of the chief Errors embrac'd and receiv'd by the So* cinians, and the antient Herefies from whence they received them, that we may fee how carefully we ought to (hun that Herefy, which is indeed the mod abominable of all Herefies, and the Recep- tacle of all the vile Tenets of all the Hereticks of former Ages, that we may learn to deteft thofe Prin- ciples which are laid to undermine our Chriftian Faith, to rob us of our Hope, to deprive us of our Saviour, to dethrone the Son of God, to be- reave us of our Redeemer, to bring us to Defpair, and leave us a Prey to the Devil. A Catalogue of Socinian Principles, and the antient Herefies whence they are drawn* It is really very remarkable, that the Socinians have collected all the antient Herefies in their Scheme. Mod of the antient Hereticks held fome Points of Faith pure and uncorrupt ,• but the So- cinians have none that are orthodox, and, as if they were to fill up the meafure of Iniquity, they have receiv'd all that the Enemy of God thought deftrudive to Religion into their Syftem. 7%e Socinian Principles. The antient Hereticks. I. Of human Reafon. I. Of human Reafon. The Socinians hold that Peter Abailardus, Anno human Reafon is the 1140, a noted Heretick, Judge of Revelation, who had reviv'd moft of that there muft be no the old Errors, taught Myftery in Religion, nor that nothing was to be nothing admitted but admitted in Religion but what what - ■■■* ; ; ' 0u i 3 . ' Socinian c Principles. ^5 1 what our Reafon can wnac our Reafon fnaft comprehend *, admit of tv This is Ievell'd againfl the great Articles of the Chriftian Faith of the bJeffed Trinity, the hypo- ftatick Union* the Work of Redemption, the Im- putation of the Righteoufnefs of Chrift; which have fomething in them furpafling our Undemand- ing, and are call'd Myfteries, becaufe we could never have known them without an immediate Re- velation from God, and becaufe we cannot fully underftand them now they are reveai'd. See Dr. Payne on i Tim. iii. p. fag* 6. II. Of the holy Scrip- II. Of the holy Scrip- tures, tures. The Socinians feem to be orthodox in this'Ar- ticle ; for Socinus fays j|, That no Argument or Teftimonies concerning Religion, can be drawn but from the written Word of God ; and ** that nothing lefs than the divine Providence could have * Socinus de Servatore, P. 2. c. 4. Schlichtingius contr. Meifner. de Trin. p. 122. Qmcquid nobis revelatum eft, quicquid a nobis credi debet, id nequaquam rationis captum excedit, vel excedere poteft.— Difcourfe of the word Myftery, p. 5. Chrifiianity not MyJIerious, p. 38. " Revelation is not to be st received only becaufe reveai'd, but only from the Evidence in the " thing it f elf and the clear Conception -we form of it, j- Bernard, Ep. 190. Credere nolle quicquid non pofiit ratfone attingere. || Socin. contr. Wiek. 1. 7. c. 9. Nulla alia funt principia aut teftimonia, unde argumenta duci ac promi poflint omnibus com- munia, qui de Ecclefia controverfaritur, prxter ipfura fcriptum Dei verbum. ** Socin. Ep. 3. ad Radecium. Hocq; ad divinam providentiam pertinere prorfus arbitror, ut ejufmodi fcripta nunquam depraven- tur, neque ex toto, neque ex parte. A a preferv'd 354 A Catalogue of Ch. 23. preferv'd them from being corrupted wholly or in part. This is very well; but it is an Obfervation of Irenaus *, that the Heretic ks of his time fpake as the Orthodox, us'd their Words and Expreflicns, and under thofe Vehicles infus'd their Poifon into the Minds of the Unwary. And truly fo do the So- cimans, they talk of the Perfection of the holy Scrip- tures, whilft they believe nothing of it; for as the excellent Prideaux f has obferv'd, 4C Mahomet re- ct je&s the Scriptures as corrupted, and therefore cc compos'd his Alcoran. And in this Mahomet Cl acted much wifer than our Sociniaw, who with him cc denying the holy Trinity, and the- Divinity of cc our Saviour, yet frill allow the holy Scriptures, as cc now in our hands, to be genuine and uncorrupted, " with which their Doctrine is in the mod mani- cc fefl manner totally inconiiflent : If they had, with Marcionites, and o- thers, have repudiated the Old Teftament as ufe- lefs ft- III. Of the Holy Tri- nity. This the Socinians bor- rowed from the Cerin- thianSy Ebionites^ Samofa- * Socin. c. 1. p. 16. de Author. S. Scr. Quod verb pertinet ad au= toritatem veteris Teftamenti, ea non eft hie magnifacienda. Mofcorovius contr. Suiglecium, p. 19. Chriftianam veritatem non aliunde quam e monumentis Apoftolorum effe petendam. -j- Socin. Left. Sacr. p. 57. Exiftimamus quod non omnes facri libri hodie extant, quod autem perierunt multi facri libri, ap- paret manifefte. Mr. Toland'i Nazarenus, or Gofyel of Barnabas, was puhliftid Anno 1718, to oppofe the Go/pels receiv'd in all Ages, to con- front Paul, and make him an Impoftor, to jet Chrifiianity in a true Light by Mahometan Authority , and with Mahometan /»- terpolations. * J] BifJjcp Stillingfleet of Chrift's Satisfaction, p. 4, &c. p. 10, 17. ** Oftorodus Inftit. c. 1. p. 3. Quare judicamus omnes illos graviter 5c periculose errare, qui puranr facram Scripturam fins interna illuminatione 6c fpeciali revelatione S. Spiriiu?, nuilaui fidem 6c cbedientiam in hominibus efficere poffe. ft Aug. I. 1. contr. Manich. only A a 3 teniansj ^6 A Catalogue of Ch. 2$. only deny'd * by the So- tertians, Arians, Mahome- c'mians, but feoff 'd at tans y and others ||. and ridicurd with mod horrible Blafphemiesf. IV. Of the Divinity IV. Of the Divinity of Jefus Chrift. of Jefus Chrift. _ The Socinians deny the From the antient He- Divinity of Chrift **, reticks nam'd before. and acknowledge the an- tient Hereticks of their Mind fti tn0 ne teySy that his Opinion of Chrift * Socin. contr. Wiek. Refp. ad 4. prior, c. 2. Conamur ex 6U vinis teftimoniis indeq; apertiflimis rationibus defumptis planifli- mum facere, fummum 5c inexplicabilem fuifle errorem illorum qui primi aufi funt, alium quempiam praeter folum Chrifti Patrem, ilium unum Deum efTe aflerere, 6c in ipfam numero unicam elfentiam divinam plures perfonas inducere. Racov. Catech. de E (Tent. Dei, C. 1. Q. 2<$. 6£. Communiter tamen in Chriftianifmo creditur non tantum Patrem, fed etiam Filium & Spiritum fan&um perfonas efTe in eadem divina Eflentia J R, Equidem verum efTe ita credi, Ced errant in eo, arque abu- tuncur ea fine quibufdam demonftVationibus ex facra Scriptura depromptis, quas dextre non intelligunt. f / dread to mention the horrid Blafphetnies vented again/i the [acred Trinity ; they are to be found collecled by Hoornbeck, in his apparatus to Socinianifm confuted, p. 98. and 1. 2. c. 5. § 1. K4I5- || Sifnop Bull, Judic. Eccl. Carhol. c. 2, 3. p. 292, &c. "*"* Racov. Catech. de perfona Chrifti, C. 1. Q. 4» Q. Dixeris Dominum Jefum natura efle hominem : an idem habec naturam divinam ? R. Nequaquam, nam id non folum rationi fanae, verum etiam divinis litens repugnat. ff Socin. 2d Refp. ad Volan. p. 2«J$. Jam quod attinet ad Paulum Samofatenum, eum quidem nobifcum fenfifle arbitramur in eo, quod Dei fiiium, antequam in Maris virginis utero concipe- retur, revera exu'tifie negaverit ; atque adeo ejus de Chrifti per- fona femcntiarn univerfam parum a noftra abfuiflc credimus. Socin. Ch. 25, Chrifl is different from all Mankind*. V. OftheHolyGhofh The Socinians fay that the Holy Spirit is not a divine Perfcn, but a Vir- tue, a Power of God f, a fomething between God and a Creature ||, and deny to worfhip him ** VI. Of the divine At- tributes. The Socinians fay, that the divine Attributes are not Perfections in God, nor God himfelf, but fomething different from God, Socinian Principles . 357 V.OftheHolyGhoft. This they borrowed from Photinus the Here- tick, who liv'd Anno 344, and faid, the Holy Ghoft was not vwrdpivw 77, a felf-fubfifling Per- fon, but a Power and Virtue of God. VI. Of the divine At- tributes. This the Socinians bor- row 5 d from Gilbert Porre- taniiSy Bifhop of PoiEliers^ who h"rft broach'd thefe Errors, for which he was Socin. ibid. p. 239. Photinum fummum virum fuifle, 5c eum fpfiflimam noftram fententiam 6c fermone & fcriptis acriter de- fen difle. * Socin. contr. Wiek, c. 5. 1. 3. Arg. 14. Nos ingenue profire- mur fententiam noftram de Chrifti natura five eflentia, adverfari omnibus Scripture Imerpretibus, quorum fcripta ad noftram aeta- tem pervenere. ■j- Socin. contr. Wiek. c. 10. ad c. i fed vis quae naturaliter in Deo refidet. Rscov. Catech. c. 6. Q- 12. m %* Goflavius contr. Keckerman, p. I. c 71. Refpondeo, Spiritum fan&um efTe tertium quid inter Deum & creaturam. ** MifTale Cracovienf. Anno 1510. Norandum quod nulla o- ratio dirigitur ad Spiritum, quia Spiritus fanftus eft donum ; &a dono non petitur donum, fed a largitora doni. A a 3 358 A Catalogue of Ch. 2 3 . God, fomething between Gcd and a Creature *. was condemn'd Anno 1148, by a Council at Rheims, under Pope £«- ^«f, and refuted by St. Bernard, Serm* in Cant. 8. p. 158. VII. Of the Eternity of Gcd. This they borrow'd from the afore-nam'd PorretanuSy who fays, that Gcd is no.t iree from Ac- cidents and new Disco- veries. Bernard, he. citat. VII. Of the Eternity of God. The Socinians Oty, that Eternity is an eternal Succeffion of. Time, ha- ving fomething pa/1, pre- fent, and to come ; and even in regard to God hirnfelf, there is always fomething pad, prefent, and to come f . * Adam Goflavius contr. Keckerman. P. 1. c. ^. p. 71, Refpon- deo efle medium, five efle tertfum quid inter Deum 6c creaturam. Quid eft hujufmodi inquies ? JEternhas aio, 6c a&iones Dei, turn facilitates iliac quibus Deus agit quicquid vulr. Id. P. 1. c. 3. p. 27. Falfum eft Deum efle quicquid in Deo eft, Jonas Schlichtingius contr. Meifner. p. 12. Ponamus enim fa!fum efle, ut quidem eft, iilorum fententiam qui peifuafum ha- bent omnia divina Attributa, puta Dei fapientiam, potentiam, boni- tatem, voluntatem, & quicquid illi inefle, Scriptura teftatur efle ipfum Deum. •J- Socin. Prelect, c. 8. p. 2,5. Tempus enim aeternum eft ; quic- quid Theolop contra difputant, femperque 6c fuit 6c futurum eft, ut &C prseteritum aliquid 6c praefens Si futurum fit,, ipfius quoq; refpeclu Dei aliquid pra:temum, aliquid vero pisefens, auquid etiam futurum eft. G-fUvius, P. 2. c. 8. p. ico. contr. Keckerman. Quid it3 > an ./Erernitas tempus non eft ? at eft duvatio prasfens, praeterita, & futura ut tempus fi igitur yEternitas eft tempus, & in tempore eft prius 6c poftcrius, cur in iEternitate non prius 6c pofterius ? an tempus infinitum non eft tempus > VIII. Of Ch. 2 j. Socinian VIII. Of the Omni- prefence of God. Socinus fays, that God, as to his Prefence, is in Heaven only, tho his Power is every where *. Principles. 359 VIIJ. Of the Omni- prefence of God. Anaftafius Sinaita, Bi- fhop of Antiochy Anno $6ij fays, that the Hereticks he wrote againft held, that God, as to his Ef- fence, was included in Heaven ,• but as to his Power, was omnipre- fent. Bill. Patrum* To. 9. in fine. IX. Of the Omnifci- IX. Of the Omnifci- ence of God. ence of God. Socinus fays, that God This Error was held is not omnifcient, that by fome in France, and he does not know every condemn'd by Stephen* thing, nor foreknow fu- Bifhop of Paris, Anno ture Events \. 1226. Nay, Smalcuis fays, God knows not the Ac- tions of Men, no, not one Year before |j. * Socin. Catecb. p. 1 jg. Dei fubftantiam non ubique pariter praefentcm e(Te, 5c fie earn non elTe immenfam five infinitam ; quamvis ubique tamen fua virtute & providentia fit ipfe Deus prsefens. Socin. contr, Francif. David, de Invoc. Chrift. c. 14, Deus non eft nobifcum, per divinam naturam aut effentiam, fed per virtu- tem, favorem 8c auxiiium fuum. I Socin. Praeled. c. 8. p. 25. Animadvertendum eft infallibilem iftam Dei praenotionem, quam pro re concefTa adverfaiii fumunt, a nobis non admitti. ' || Smalcius contr. Frantz. Difp. 12. thef. 3. Socin. Praeleft. c. 8. p. 27. At vero etiamfi Deus non omnia nofcat amequam finf, nihil tamen abfurdi inde apparer. Cui enim ufut obfecro ifta prxnotio effet ? an non fat'is eft Deutn can&a regere perpetuo ac gubernarc ? Aa X. Of X. Of the divine Im- mutability- The Socinians fay, that God is fubjed to Affec- tions, and Paflions, and Motions of a vertible Will * , and that God re- ceives Joy and Sorrow in fome meafure, as we dof. A Catalogue of Ch. 2 5 . X. Of the divine Im- mutability. This is peculiar to Socinus ; for I don't re- member any one of that Mind before. Yet he allows the Angels fuch a Felicity, where there is not nor can be any Change ||. XI. Of the Juftice of God. Socinus fays, there is no Juftice in God which obliges him to punifh Sinners **• XI. Of the Juftice of God. The Coluihianii antient Hereticks, Anno 290, held that God, by and according to his Juftice, is not oblig'd to punifh Sinners. XII. Of * Crellius de Deo & Attribut. c. 31. Diximus affe&us illos Dei efle commotione? quafdam divinae voluntatis, fan's enitn liquet eos nihil efle aliud quam afrus feu commotiones quafdam divins voluntatis, ex ,-ognitione rei gratse vel ingratse, &3m vel ample&emes vel ugi fl ntes. I Crellius de Deo, c. 31. p. 320. Verum tamen & illud ap- paret aliquid in Deo a^nofcenoum effe analogum ei moleftiae, quam ncs percipimus. Crell. contr. Grotium de fatisfaft. c. 2. p. 194. Non licet ta- men eoufque a verborum propne'ate difcedere„ quin aliquid in Deo ftaiuas ei laetitiae analogum, qua: . homines capiunt. jj Socin. contr. Pnccium, p. 153. Uui nulla varietas eft vel efle poteft. ** Socin. raclecl. c. 16. Neque enim in Deo ulla juftitia eft, qua? peccata on :iino punire jubeat, cui ipfe renunciare non poftit. Eft quidem in Deo perpetua juflitia ; fed ha»c nihil a'iud eft quam a:quitas & rectitude. ■ — Juftitia ifta vulgari nomine fie appel- lata, quae mifericordiac opponitur, Dei qualius non eft, fed tan« turn efteclum voluntatis ipfius. Racov. Catcch. Q. 20. c. 8. Cfcu 2 3 . Socinian Principles. 361 XII. Of Natural Re- XII. Of Natural Re- ligi< n. The Socinians fay there is no Knowledge of God in tfre Heart of any Man*, or that Man does not know there is a God by the Light of Nature. XIII, Of the Know- ledge of God from the Creatures. Soeinus fays, that God cannot in any wife be know n from his Works t- ligion. This is peculiar to the Socinians, againft the Judgment of all Man- kind. XIIL Of the Know- ledge of God from the Creatures. This is alfo peculiar to the Socinians , againft the Judgment of all Man- kind, and p the exprefs Word of God. XIV. Of the Image of God. The Socinians fay, that the Image of God does not confift in the Rec- titude of the Mind, but in the Dominion of the Crea- XIV. Of the Image of God. Refp—Mifericordiam & juftitiam negamus Deo inefle nata- raliter. See Bifliop Stilling fleet'; Sufferings of Chrijl, Pref. p. 28. * Socin. Praeleft. c. 2. Homini naturaliter, ejufque animo, non infita fit Divinitatis alicujus opinio. Oftorodus Inftit. p. 1. & 10. Quod homines de Deo aliquid fciunt, id non habent ex natufa^aeque ex confideratione crea- tionis, fed ex auditu, quoniam aB" initio Deus. fe hominibus mani- feftavit. | Socin. Prael. c. 2. Negamus Deum aliquo modo ex operibus agnofci po(Te. Oftorodus Inftitut. p. i. & p. 75. ^6 % r jA Catalogue of Ch. 1 3 . Creatures only || ; and that it is falfe, that Man is only made in the I- mage of God*. XV. Of original Sin. XV. Of original Sin. The Socinians fay there This the Socinians bor- is no original Sin t, and row'd from the antient that the Corruption of Pelagians, and Peter Abai- our Nature by Sin, is a fard, Anno 1140, who de- iiliy Fable ** introduc'd ny'd original Sin. by Antichrift. into the Chriftian Church. \\ Socfn. Prael. c. 3. p. 8. Dei imago & fimilitudo ad quam con- ditus eft homo, ne in ipfa quidem mente, ac ratione, unde omnis juftitia in ilium derivari porerat, praecipue confiftit ; fed in domi- natu rerum omnium, praecipue inferiorum. Oftorodus Inftit. c. 34. p. 267. Porro ftatuimus imaginem & fi- militudinem ad quam homo creatus eft, primo & praecipue efle dominium quod Deus homini in reliquas creaturas dedit. Deinde rationem, etenim abfq^ ejus ufu, nemo creatis rebus do- minari potent. Socin. Prael. c. 3. p. 8. Concludamus igitur, Adam etiam, ante- quam mandatum illud Dei tranfgrederetur, revera juftum non fuifle. Smakius contr. Smiglec. deDei fil. c.7. p. ^9. Ego dico veterem 6c fcctidam fabulam efle, ftatuere hominem primum in fua crea- tione tam fanctitatem quam alia dona fupranaturalia habuifTe. * Socin. Refp. ad Arg. pro Trin. p. 54, $5. Smalcius refut. Scopper. f Catech. Racov. c. x. de lib. Arbitr. Q. 2. 0. Nonne peccato originis hoc liberum arbitrium vitiatum eft? R. Peccaium originis nullum prorfus eft, quare nee liberum arbitrium vitiare potuit. Oftorodus Inftit. 33. in fine. Concludimus ergo nullum omnmo efle peccatum originate, 6c confequenter ex primorum hominum peccato, nullum defectum in ejus pofteros propagatum efle vel pervenifle. ** Socin. de Juftific. p. 11. Dialog. Commentum illud de pec- cato originis, feu parentum culpa, fabula Judaica eft— ab Anti- chrifto in Chrifti Ecclefiam introdu&um. Smalcius de pecc. Origin. Peccatum illud mera fabula eft. XVI. Of Ch. 23. Socinian Principles. ^6j XVI. Of Free-will. The Socinians fay that there is no Inability in us to do good *j but that we may believe and be converted as well without the Grace of God as with f. XVII. Of Death, the Wages of Sin. The Socinians fay, that Death is not the confe- quence of Sin, but of his natural Compofition II ,* and that Mankind wou'd have been fubjed to Death, if there had been no Sin **. XVI. Of Free-will. From the antienn Pe- lagians. XVII. Of Death, the Wages of Sin. This was the antient Error of the Pelagians \\, who had it from Her- mes Trifmegiftus, tho im- prov'd ||||. * Socin. Ep. 2. ad Dudith. Deus valt, ut homo pro fuo ipfius arbitrio, non minus improbus, quam probus efle poteft. Racov. Catech. c. x. de lib. arbitr. /£. i. Eftne id fitum in noftra poteftate, ut ad eum modum Deo obtemperemus ? R. Prorfus. Etenim certum eft primum hominem ita a Deo conditum fuifle, ut libero praeditus eiTet arbitrio ; nee vero caufa fubeft, cur Deus poft ejus lapfum ilium eo privaret j ac neque Juftitia Dei permittit. f Catech. Racov. c. 6. Q. n. 6^ Nonne ad credendum Evangelio Spiritus San&i interiori dono opus eft ? R. Nullo modo. |j Socin. de Servat. 1. 3. c. 8. Mortem temporalem, quatenus na- turaiis eft, 5c omnibus communis, non efTe peccati ftipendium, fed nature noftrae, quam ipfemet'Adamus in ipfa creatione acce^ pit propriam fequelam. ** Socin. de Servat. I. 3, c. 8. Conditio moriendi ipfius tantum propagations vi ad pofteros Adami omnes eft tranfmifia. ff St. Auguft. 1. de Hasr, 88. Ipfum quoque Adam dicunt fi non peccafTet, fulfTe corpore mdriturum; neque mortuum merito culpa:, fed conditione naturae. |||| Heim. in Paemandr. tuv Aijiov n §&v*l* %§al* ccomlos. XVIII. Of 364 A Catalogue of Ch. 23. XVIII. Of the Incar- XVIII. Of the Incar- nation of Chrift. This was borrowM from fome of the School- men, as Catharinu^ who follow'd Scotus in this O- pinion ||. dire&ly con- trary to the Scriptures, 1 'Tim* i. 15. Hd. Matth. ix. 13. iu 14. m XIX. Of the Afcen- Hon of Chrift into Hea- ven, to receive the Gof- pel. From Mahomet's famous Night-Journey to Hea- ven, Alcoran Azoar xvii. antion of Chrift. The Socinians fay, that Chrift would have be- come Man, akho Adam had not finned *, to make Men, who were created mortal, immortal \; but then he would not have furrer'd. XIX. Of the Afcen- fion of Chrift into Hea- ven, to receive the Gof- pel. The Socinians fay, that Chrift, immediately after his Baptifm, was taken up intoHeaven, and there in- ftructed in theDo&rine of the Gofpel ; and then re- ceived his Commiflion to preach it to the World *'*. And Socinus owns inge- nuoufly, that this was not known to the pri- mitive Church ft • * Smalcius Refut. Thef. Frantz.Difp. 4. p. 124. •J- Frantz. Difput 1. Thef. 35. Difp. 14. Thef. 8. & 74. Id. Schol. Sacrif. Praefat. p. 3. j| Catharin. 1. de praedeftin. Chrifti. See Hoornbeck. Soc. Conf. Tom. 2. "** Oftoroduslnftit. c. \6. Chriftum fub minifterii fui initium afcendifle in ccelum, 6c ibi edodum a Paire ccclefti, inde ruifum c coelo defcendifTe. Smalcius de Divinir. Chr. c. 4. Certum eft dominum Jefum mortalem licet, Deum Patrem vidifie, 6c ab eo immediate edoc- tum fuifle. Ibid. Chriftus in ccclo, a Deo Evangelium didicit. It Socin. Inftit. Relig. Chr. p. 128. XX. Ad- Ch. 2 3 . Sociniati Principles. 365 XX. Additions to the XX. Additions to the Law. Law. The Socinians hold, that This Chrift made feveral Ad- ditions to the Law, and gave forne Precepts of his own, unknown to the Mofakk Difpenfati- on * which they call the perfect Commands of God ; among which, to the firft Commandment, is Prayer and the Wor- fhip we are to pay to Chrift f. And yet they dare aflert there is no Command to worfhip Chrift. XXI. Of Jefus Chrift as Redeemer. 7"he Socinians fay, that Chrift is not the Re- deemer of Mankind, and that it is a moft perni- they borrow'd from the antient Mam- chees y who aflerted this Proportion contrary to the exprefs Words of Scripture. • cious Error to fay that he XXL Of Jefus Chrift as Redeemer. Peter Abailard, Anno 1 140, among other He- terodox Opinions, held, that Chrift fuffer'd not for Sin , for which, and other * Racov. Catech. de Prsec. Ch. c. I. 6^ Qnacnam funt perfe&a mandara Dei per Cririftum patefafta ? R. Pars eorum continetur in praeceptis a Mofe traditis, una cum iis quse funt eis in novo foedere addita. f Racov. Catech. de Prxc. leg. Add. Q^ 19. 6£. Quid vero ad ha^c addidit Dominus Jefus ? R. Primum hoc, quod nobis certam orandi rationem praefcrfp- ferit quas Matth. 6, 9. habetur. 6^39. Qu.d prseterea Dominus Jefus huic prscepto primo ad- didit ? R. Id, Quod etiimnum Dominum Jefum pro Deo cognofcere tenemur ; i.e. pro eo, qui in nos habet poteftatem divinaoi, Sz. cui nos divinum exhibcre honorem obftrifti fuir.uf. -$66 A Catalogue of Ch. 23. he fuffer'd for our Sins, other Opinions, Baro- or obtain'd Salvation for nius fays he was con- us*,- nay, that it is a dem'd at Rome by Pope ridiculous, childifh, blaf- Innocent II. phemous Fable f . XXII. Of the Sacer- XXII. Of the Sacer- dotal Office of Chrift. dotal Office of Chrift. The Sccinians fay, that Chrift was not a Prieft till he afcended into Heaven, and that he of- fered no Sacrifice upon the Crofs |J. * Racov. Catech. c. 8. Q. 12. 6^ Nonne eft aliqua alia mortis Chrifti caufa ? R. Nulla prorfus. Etfi nunc vulgo Chriftiani fent'unt Chrif- tum morte fua nobis falutem meruiiTe, & pro peccatis noftris plenarie fatisfecifle ; qua; fententia fallax eft, & erronea & admo- dum perniciofa. This Catechifm composed by Smalcius, Anno i5o5, out of So- cinus'* Writings in Polifh, and that Anno 1609, publi(h*d in Latin by Mofcorovius, has the Anfwer as above ; but the lafi Edition cf Anno 1680. revisw'dby Schlichtingius, Ruarus, and others, has many Alterations in it, as is conjefs d by the Editors in the Pre- face; for there, p. 141. the Anfwer is, Chrift fufFer'd for our Sins by God's Appointment, as a Sacrifice of Expiation. This -was put in for fliame ; for Socinus faith y deServat. p. 2. c. 7. That it is a great Untruth, j Oftorodus Inftir. c.36. p 310,311. || Racov. Catech. c. 13. de Munere Sacerdot. Q. 8. <§£. Quid ? annon erat Sacerdos, antequam in ccelis afcenderet, £c prxfertim cruci affixus penderet ? R. Non erat. Smalcius Refp. ad Smiglec. c. 28. Chriftus in terra nullum facri- ficium pere^ir. XXIII. Of Ch. 2 3 . Socinian Principles. 3 67 XXIII. Of the Body XXIII. Of the Body of the Lord Jefus Chrift of the Lord Jefus Chrift now in Heaven. now in Heaven. The Socinians fay, that the Body of Chrift in which he dy'd, and rofe, and afcended into Hea- ven, is now no more ,* and that it is horrible to think that * it is now exifling. t XXIV. Of Juftifica- i XXIV. Of Juftifica- tion by Faith. tion by Faith. The Socinians deny This is borrow'd from that we are juftify'd by the antient Pelagians. Faith, and fay that Jufti- fication by Faith is a Fable and dangerous Er- ror f. XXV. Of * Socin. contr. Wi'ek. c. §. 1. 3. Arg. 13. Creditur quidem paf- fimChriftum in ccelum tranflatum habere carnem : fed ipfum adhuc e(Te carnem nemo pius vel cogitare vel audire fine horror* poteft. If the Socinians meant no more than the Perfection, of the Body of the Lord Jefus, that it is changed not according to the Nature but according to its Qualities, we (l)ould readily join with them; but that the Body of Cbriji fhould be aboliflfd and be no more, is contrary to Scripture, Reafon, and the Opinion of the An- tients. And yet fuch is their Opinion ; for Oftorodus fays, from that moment that Chrifi was exalted, and made Lord and King, he had his human Body no more, Inftit. c. 41. Nicolaides contr. Albert. Borkowski de Ecclef. c. 9. Chrifti cor- pus, quod pro nobis datum fuit, m etiam faniiuis, nunc nullum eft. f Socin. de Servator. p. 4, c. 3. & c. 11. p. 401. Juftificationem per fidem in Chriftum, ut exponunt Evangelic*, meram elTe fabu- lam 6c commentum humanum. £ Tht A Catalogue • of Ch. 23. Fa- Old XXV. Of the thers under the Teftament. Fa- Old XXVI. Of the Sacra- ments. 3 memini. Bb 370 A Catalogue of that God cannot raife thefe Bodies again ft- Ch.23 XXVIII. Of the Im- mortality of the Soul. The antient Arabici^ and others, held that the Souls fell afleep when the Body dy'd. And Catul- lus, Ode 53. fays, That fome Philofophers alfo believ'd, that Souls fepa- rated fell into a perpe- tual Sleep.. XXVIII. Of the Im- mortality of the Soul. Tho the Socinians do not openly deny the Im- mortality of the Soul, yet they believe the Soul to be mortal ; and Soci- nus openly own'd, that the Soul, after Death, was not capable of per- ceiving Pain or Punifh- ment*. And fome of the Socinians are fallen into the foolifti Error of the Soul's fleeping f till the Day of Judgment. XXIX. Of theMife- ries of the Damned. The Socinians > alt ho they often ufe the Words of eternal Damnation, eternal Punishment, and the ff Smaklus contr. Erantz. de Jud. Extr. Impoflibile eft corpora talia olim extitura quae carnem & fanguinem habeant. Socin. to Volkelius. Ex his omnibus ne quidem per fpeciem col- ligi pofTe Chriftum aliqua ratione poft mortem vixifTe^ vel alios poft mortem vivere, Ep. V. * When Socinus was charged by his Friend Puccius, that he deny'd the Immortality of the Soul, Non me later, Socine, te ne- gare lmmortalitatem animarum, he did not deny the Charge, but roundly own' d it to Volkelius, Ep. 5. Necdum mihi quidde Animae iinmortalitate ftatuendum fit plane exploratum eft, tantum poft hanc vitam, animam five animum hominis non ita per fe fubfiftere, ut praemia ulla poenafve fentiar, vel etiam fentiendi capax fit, firma mea opinio eft. -j- Schlichtingius, ad Heb. £. Sine vita & fenfu elTe ufque ad ultimum j udicium. XXIX. OftheMifc ries of the Damned. Ch. 23* Socinian 'Principles. 37Y the like, yet believe not a Word of it ; and fay that eternal Damnation is a total Annihilation, a Reduction into no- thing || . XXX* Of the Civil XXX. Of the Civ*i Magiftrates. Magiftrates, The Socinians fay, that Chriftians cannot hold the Office of Magiftrates, and may not punifh Of- fenders f, neither for Murder, Herefy, or any other Crime * This j| Socin. contr. Volanum, p. 2, too\ Et tandem per eanctem p& tentiam cum fcelerati homines prorfus per demur, atque aetern* morti adjudicabuntur. Smalcius de divin. Chr. c. 14. Certum eft hoc ccelum 5c terram deftructum iri. c. 22. Tunc univerfi hanc mundi machinam 9 ccelum & terram & omnia qua? in iis fan, una cum hominibus impiis, igne illo aeterno cremabit Chriftus. - Volkelius de Relig. J. 3. c. 12. p. 73. and p. 134. /•*)'-'> That eternal Death is a total Annihilation and Extinction of Being. Smalcius contr. Fran. p. 414. fays. The Scriptures no where fay that the Wicked (hall be eternally exiftent t& fuffer eternal Pu- nifhment. f Socin. defenf. ver. Sent, de Mag. Pol. adv. Palacol. p. 2> fol. 2^3,235. Affirmo a Racovienfibus non negari Chriftiano ho- mini civilem magiftratum gerere licere, eumque fummum etiam regern & monarchum effe pofle 5 fed negant eum qui Chriftianus effe velit, humanum fanguinem what others mud expect, and by full Declaration, what they would think themfelves- oblig'd to do || : « He- u reticks, fays be, are " to be puniuVd, as well " as furious and mad " Men; altho thefe laft ct defer ve Companion, eLylmv m (te?, the Love of God. And the Syriack reads it, as Bex,a tells us, not only the Love of God, but the Love of God towards us ; in the fame manner as the Love of God the Father is exprefs'd, eh- iv. 9, fo the Love of God the Son is exprefs'd here. * Anno 1599, by Chrift. Barker. f A ceci nous avons connu la charite, c'eft 2) E N T> A. And indeed the whole Context runs in the fame manner ; fcr in this Epiftle, and particularly in this Chapter, the Apoftle fpeaks of more divine Perfons than one, and calls each God ; for at ver. i. he fpeaks of God the Father ; and after that, at yer. 2. of that God who was to appear, as he fays, ver. 5. that he did appear, God did appear to take away our Sins, ver* 5. and God will appear to re- ward his Servants ; and then he fpeaks all along of Chrifl by the name of God, and predicates of him, ver. 16. that he laid down his Life for us. Now God, as God, cannot lay down his Life ; and he that did lay" down his Life for us is Jefus Chrift, and this Jefus Chrift^ therefore, is that God ; and fo the Apoftle concludes this Epiftle, We know that the Son of God is come, and has given us an Uti- derflanding that we may know him that is true y and we are in him that is true-) even in his Son Jefus Chrifl ; this is the true God and eternal Life, 1 John v. 20. and concludes all, Little Children keep your felves from Idols ; affuring us, if we do not acknowledge Jefus Chrift to be the true God, that we make an Idol of him. Page 37. Line 25. after Chrift, add, And Beza has render'd it admirably well, look- ing for that bleiTed Hope, and the illuftrious ap- pearing of the Glory of that great God, and our Saviour, namely, Jefus Chrift f. And the French Verfion f,— the Appearance of the Glory of the great God, who is our Saviour Jefus Chrift. And this Text has been explain'd fo by the Antients, * Beza. Expe&antes beatam illam Spem, & illuftrem. ilium ad- ventum gloriae magni illius Dei ac Servat©ris Noftri, nempe Jefu Chrifti. f The French Bible & L' Apparition de la gloire da grand Dieu qui eft noftre Sauyeur Jefus Chrift. both A 2> 2) E NT> A, both Greek and Latin, with an admirable Agree* ment *. Page^S. Line 6. after Chrift, add, But the French Tranflation has it mord to the purpofe, which reads it, denying or renouncing the only Sovereign Jefus Chriit our God and Lord f. Page 55. Line 20. after him, add, And accordingly we find that the word ^cS]o\qk^, which we have rendered firfi-bom, is translated by born before. So OEcumenius has ufed it, born before, and only' begotten, before the whole Creation}}. So Pafor among the Moderns, begotten before all the Creation ** ; and Ravanel fays ft, that t^o]oko? vrctMf Kliwaf does lignify && taW kI'htzm, be tore all the Cre.rion, before any ching was created. And the antient Belg'ch Verfion, of Anno 1564.. of Bief- kens reads it, ue eerfte gcbo^cn booj aUe Cftatutert, Page 208. Line 1. after own Father, rf<&/,- And alfo the French, que Dieu eftoit [on propre Pere 7 that God was his own Father; for tho the Latin * Pool. Synop. Critic, in loc. Vol. IV. p. 1155- ■}■ French Verfion, Renoncans le feul Dominateur Jefus Chi iff noftre Dieu 6c Seigneur. j[ OEcumenius, as I find him quoted by Dr. Gregory in loc. >rej vdava KJitriae tjrfalojoKos ^ povoyivui yvwbeK' ** Pafor. Lex. in Nov. T. Pag. 65*1. Genitus ante omnem crca- furam. ft Ravanel. Bibl. Sac. p. 353. Par. II. vrsvjoloKOs vrc£tf-x K"tffi»e flgnificat genitarn efTe, fjr^) KcLMt K]i T> E N D A. Vulgar, and Beza, have render'd iJW by fuum y his, St. Ambrofe has render'd it Patrem proprium *, and Arias Montanus alfo f ; and Joh> Cocceius, his own Father, i. e. 2l Father in fuch a manner, as no one has God for his Father but himfelf ||. And this Expreffion of his own Father, has as great Force and Strength here, as that of his own Son has by St. Paul, Rom. viii. 32. 'That fp are d not his own Son, %< >% *S }JHov vi* qvk 'ip&tt&lo y where we have render'd the Word in its full Strength his own, forafmuch as the Apoflle by that Word de- fign'd to magnify the Greatnefs of God's Grace, and at the fame time to exprefs the Divinity of Chrift in the ftrongeft manner. And fo the French and Belgick ** have render'd it alfo, his own, becaufe the Strength of the Apoftle's Argument lies in that very Word ft, as the Strength of the Jews Ar- gument lay in that Word, that Chrift thereby made himfelf equal with God. Page 254. Line 18. after Juvencus, add, Mr. Alberti, in his Philofophical Obfervations on the New Teftament, tells us, That thefe Magi have, by a late Critick, been afferted to have been neither Pevftans, nor Babylonians, nor Syrians, but Jews, exil'd Jews, the Offspring of thofe that had been carry'd away by Salmanaffer and Nebuchad- * Ambrof.de Fide ad Gratian. c.4. 1. 2. p. 291. Edit. Parif. 1569. Johan. Gi!lotii. f Arias Montanus Nov. Teft. Pool Synopf. Critic, in Rom. viii. 32. || Joh. Coccejus in loc. Patrem fuum proprium, i. e. eo modo quo nemo Deum habet Patrem. ** French, Son Propre Fils. Belgick, §>£tUH t\>$tflttt done. ft Gafpar. Oleviani, Not. in loc. ad Rom. Edit, a Beza, Genev. 1579. p. 3 8 5- nezar > A 2) 2) E N2) A. nezar; and that they came to Jerufalem in the qua- lity of publick EmbafTadors of thofe Exiles, to pay their Refpeds to the Meflias their King ; and to congratulate their Brethren of Judea about his Birth. But withal, he tells us, that this Opinion, which he afcribes to Herman Vander Hardt^ ProfefTor of Helm- ftad, has been confuted by Herman ab Ehwick*. But fuppofing they had been fuch EmbafTadors, their Principals muft receive the Commiffion for that Embaffy from Heaven by Revelation ; for it is impoflible to conceive that thofe who fent them could have known the Birth of the Meflias at that diftance by a new Star only, without fpecial In- flrudions from God that that was his Star f; and even then they muft upon their own Principles, when they ador'd him, adore him as God, fince the Jews themfelves believ'd that their King Mef- fias, according to the Prophets, was to be the mighty God, the Emmanuel || ; and becaufe they could not worfhip him if they believ'd him to be a Nlan only, for that would be notorious Idolatry, * New Memoirs of Literature, 1725. Vol. II. p. 62. + Maldonat. in Matth. ii. 2. || S(* Page 174. Texts Texts of Scripture Uluftrated and Explained. GENESIS. CH. I. Ver. i. />*£* 54. III. 15. io5. IV. 1. 107. — • 7. no. V. 24. hi. XXXI. 13. 127. EXODUS. a.m. ?w\2. 132. XXIII. 20,21. i 37 , PSALMS. P/i/.IL Ver. 12. 157. XXII. 160. XCVII. 7. 5,0. CII. 25,16,27. 48. PROVERBS. C&. VIII. ^r. 22. 164. ISAIAH. C^. IX. /^r. 6. 38. JEREMIAH. CA. XXIII. ^r.6. 32. MICAH. Cb. V. P*r. 2. Page 46* MATTHEW. C^ IX. Ver.i — %. 225. xvi. 16. 265. XXVI. 53,^4. 234. XXVIII. 10. 242. LUKE. C/;. I. Ver. j6. XXIII. 34. 240. 237. JOHN. Ck. I. Z^r. 1,2,3,4 III. V. VI. VIII. l6. 18. IP- 25. I6. 56. — 58. IX. 35,36. 217, 261. X. 36. 218. XL P5>. 202. 206. 207. 52, 20£. 49. 211, 6"C. 2IJ. 120. 227. 2*exts Explain d. a. XI. Ver. 4. Page 221- COLOSSIANS. xvr. 15. 225. Cb.l. Ver. 15,16,17. 54' XVII. - 229. II. 9. 4J- XIX. — 2 J 6. XX. Ver. 17. 240. TITUS. , 28. 270. CZ>. II. Ver. 1 J. 37- ROMANS HEBREWS. a. IX. Ver.%. 41. G&.I. Ver. 10,11,12. 48. X. ij. 88. 1 JOHN. 1 COR. a>. v. r«r. 20. 35-- a. VIII. Ver. 6. 55- XV. 22. 63. JUDE. XVI. ib. 7 6. f^r. 4. 37- PHILIPPIANS. REVELAT. Cb. II. Ver. 10. 78. a. iv. f«-. 8. J2. THE A A AAA A A AAA A A A A THE INDEX O F Principal Matters, A. \BEL worfhip'd Chrift U as God. Page 108 Abraham worfhip'd Chrift as God. 117 Adam worfhip'd Chrift as God. 105 Adoration. See Worjhip. Adversaries, their Teftimony of Chrift's Divinity. 279 Alexandrian Creed. 293 Amen only us'd by the Jews at Thankfgiving. J 99 Anna worfhip'd Chrift as God. Ante-Nicene Creeds. 1I7 Antioch Creed. 291 Appearances of God by Mamre, 9i Appearances of God always ter- rible. 1 3 I Apojiles worfhip'd Chrift as God before his R.e fur reft ion. 26$ After his Afcenfion. 272, Apojiles, or Raman Creed. Aauileian Creed. Attributes, what. 294 293 Attributes of Eternity. Omniprefent. Immutable. 4* 47 48 Independent. Omnifcient. 49 50 Almighty. 5i B. -jryAfd's Liturgy. 3J0 JL) His fecond Liturgy. 315 Blind Man worfhip'd Chrift as God. 161 Britiflj Antient Liturgy. i l 7 c. CAZfarean Creed. 292 Characleriflicks of the true God apply'd to the Son. 30 Chr'ifl the fupreme God. 6 6 God by Nature. 3 f 1 N E X. Jofephus's Teftimony of Chrift. 280 Jofiua worfhip'd Chrift as God. 148 Jr emus' s Creed. 288 Ifaiah worfhip'd Chrift as God. 166 Judgment by Chrift as God. 64 K. KA9»Vj how us'd in rela- tion to God. z 1 8 Kifs in religious Worfhip. 1 5 7 LAws of Great Britain a- gainft Socinians, 374 Liturgies j antient. 296 Liturgy of the Church of Eng- land defended. 318 Logos, See Word, Lord's-Day dedicated to Chrift 'as God. 344 Lot worfhip'd Chrift as God. 12,5 Lucian the Martyr's Creed. 291 M. MAii worfhip'd Chrift as God. z^ 2 Mahomet pray'd to Chrift. 280 Mamre. See Word, Manoah worfhip'd Chrift as God. 152 St. Mark's Liturgy. 303 Martha worfhip'd Chrift as God. 262 Martyrs laft Prayers to Chrift as God. 238 Mary, the holy Virgin, wor- fnip'd Chrift as God. 247 Melchizedeck worfhip'd Chrift as God. n6 My or Mine, how us'd by the .Lord Chrift. 201 N N, Ames of God given to Chrift. 30 Jehovah. ib. Firft and Laft. 34 God. 35 The true God. ib. The great God and Saviour. 37 The only fovereign God and Lord. ib. The mighty God. 38 Lord God. 39 God of Gods. ib. Over all, God blefTed for ever. 41 King of Kings and Lord of. Lords. 44. Jefus Chrift is Life. ib. The Fulnefs of the Godhead. Nathanael worfhip'd Chrift as God. 260 Noah worfhip'd Chrift as God. 113 OBject of Worfhip, God only. 1 2 And why. 13 Omnipotence, See Attributes, Omniprefence. See Attributes. Omnifcience, See Attributes. Origen's Rule of Faith. 2,83 ST. Paul worfhip'd Chrift as God. 276 St. Peter worfhip'd Chrift as God. 26$ Prayer, a Duty in the time of the Old Teftament. 84 No new Duty of the Go'pel. *7 To Chrift as God in the Old Tefta- INDEX. Teftament. See Jewiftj Church. Morning and Evening to Chrift as God. 320 Profane Books abound. 2 Prophets worfhip'd Chrift as God. I5 2 SChecinab, who and what. 140 Sibylline Oracles. 284 Simeon worfhip'd Chrift as God. 254 Socinianifm is Turcifw. 351 Socinian Errors. 352 Socinian Spirit of Perfecution. 372 Diflimulation. 373 Socinianifm deftroys Chriftianity. 1, $77 Solomon worfhip'd Chrift as God. 162 Staunton borrow'd all from So- cinus. 1 1 St. Stephen worfhip'd Chrift as U. God. 274 Supreme God, Chrift fo. See Chrift. TErtullian's Creed. 289 Theodofius s Teftimony of Chrift. 2,81 Teftimony of Chrift, of his own Divinity. See Chrift. Trinity of Perfons in the Unity of the Divinity, believ'd by us becaufe of God's Veracity. . . r 28 > 73 Trinity of Perfons in the Unity of the pivinity, believ'd by die antient Jews. 138 UNity of the Divinity. See Trinity, 'ymppcoov, or Chapel in the Ark of Noah. 114 W. Wlfdom of God, who and what. 164 Word explain'd. 92 How us'd by Jews. o£ By Gentiles. ib. By St. John. 9* Works of God, of Nature, and Grace. 15 Afcrib'd to Chrift. 51 Of Creation. 52 Prefervation. 58 Miracles. 59 Mercy. 60 Forgivenefs of Sins. 6 1 Regeneration. 62 Judgment. 64 Worfhip, Religious, appropriated to the true God only. 18 Mediatorial, diftincl: from di- vine, no fuch thing. 19 Not fuperior or inferior. 20 What due to God. 2$ Of Chrift no Addition to the Law. 7 1 Worfhip, diy'me, due to Chrift by Precepts. 72 Of Faith. 73 Reliance. ib. Love. 76 Honour. 77 Service. 82 Obedience. ib. Prayer. 84 ' Acharias worfhip'd Chrift as God. 249 THE END. ERRATA. PA G E II. in Note, read Cognitu. P. 26. /. 2. dele and New* P. 34. .Mtf* /. ult. r. 1 67. />. 4^. i^^/e /.^». r . Exiftit. P. 67. L 27. ^^ true. P. 7 2. Not, r. Vader. P. 93. 2tttf. /. <5. r. fwJVv?. P. IO3. -Mtf. /• $• r. 7tt'f«. lb. /./>g». r. 7B }4V0{JLiVQV. P. 107. £ &• jfrr doubt r. know. lb. Not. I. fen. r. tyb P. 122. 1. 3. r. An? 1. P. 128. L 9. /or Senfe r. Saints. P. 153. /. i£. for for r. in, P. 192. /.«//. 4//«r from add, thofe made by. P. 207. 2. 27. r.'gA«}4. lb. /. pen. r. Dat. lb. /. ult, r. ©aDre. P« 2-45* £ M* for more r. moft. P. 250. /. 5. r. Gnaljon. P. 2 55. /. 1. for tH*. r. than. P. 289. /. 12. /or as r. is. P. 300. /. 23. put the * */"w confubftantiaL > 1.1 /