^7^ S THEOLOGICAL SEMINAR^! Princeton, J^. J. BX 6333 .M2 W6 1823^ v.^ MacLean, Archibald, 1723- 1812. The works of Mr. Archibald M'Lean fO-E •N\ //» THE WORKS MR. ARCHIBALD M'LEAN, PASTOR OF THE BAPTIST CHURCH, EDINBURGH. WITH A MEMOIR OF HIS LIFE, MINISTRY, AND WRITINGS, BY WILLIAM JONES. IN SIX VOI-UMEES. VOL. v.— Part II. LONDON : PRIKTED FOR WILLIAM JONES, LOVELl's COURT, PATERNOSTER ROW. 1823. J. Hnddon, Printer, Finsbury. WORKS ARCHIBALD MCLEAN. VOL. v.— Part II. PARAPHRASE AND COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS— Chap. IX.— XIII. APPENDIX.— FIVE DISSERTATIONS. A J^avapftra^e antr ^ammentavi) EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. CHAP. IX. CONTENTS AND SCOPE. JlN the foreg'oing' Chapter the apostle having; briefly set forth the excellency of Christ's priest- hood above that of the Levitical high-priests, in respect of the dignity and power to which he is advanced, the heavenly sanctuary in which he ofiiciates, and the more excellent ministry which he hath obtained as mediator of a better covenant, he proceeds in this chapter to explain and illustrate these matters more fully ; particularly what he had hinted (ver. 5.) concerning the Mosaic tabernacle and its priestly services, as being but a typical model and shadow of heavenly things. Vol. u. b 2 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. He observes, that the first, or Sinaitic covenant, had indeed both ordinances of divine service and a worklly holy phice, ver. 1. — Gives a particular account of the tabernacle, and of its outer and inner apartments, of which he speaks as of two tabernacles, enumerating the utensils pertaining to each, ver. 2, 3,4, 5. — That the ordinary priests went always into the first apartment, or holy place, to perform the service, ver. 6. but into the second, or holy of holies, none were permitted to enter but the high priest alone, and he only on one day in the year, and not without blood, which he of- fered first for his own sins, and then for the errors of the people, ver. 7. — That by this exclusion of all others, both people and priests, from the inner apartment where the divine presence resided, the Holy Spirit signified, that the way into the hea- venly holy place was not yet manifested, or laid open, while the first tabernacle had a standing, ver. 8. — That this tabernacle was but a parabolic or figurative representation unto the present time, in which both gifts and sacrifices are offered, which, with respect to conscience, cannot perfect him who worshippeth only with meat and drink-offerings, and divers immersions, and ordinances respecting the body, which were imposed on the Israelites until the time of reformation, when these typical institutions were to be laid aside, ver. 9, 10. He next contrasts the ministry of Christ in heaven with that of the Levitical high-priests in the earthly tabernacle, and shews, That Christ CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. '3 being- come, an High-priest of future g"oocl things, throug-h the service of a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands like the Mosaic, that is, not of this creation, nor by the blood of goats and of calves, such as the legal high-priests offered, but by his own blood, he entered once for all into the heavenly holy place, having obtained, not an annual, but an eternal redemption for us, ver. 11, 12. — And he argues that it is highly rea- sonable to believe that the blood of Christ should have such efficacy ; for if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, had the effect, by virtue of divine appoint- ment, to free the Israelites from temporal punish- ments, to cleanse their bodies from ceremonial defilements, and to fit them for approaching God with acceptance in the tabernacle worship ; — how much more must the blood of Christ, who throuoh the eternal Spirit offered himself without fault to God, be effectual, not only by divine appointment but intrinsic worth, to cleanse the conscience of sinners from the guilt of sin, and fit them for wor- shipping the living God in spirit and in truth, ver. 13, 14. — That for this reason he is the mediator of a new covenant, that his death beina: accom- plished for the expiation of the transgressions com- mitted under the first covenant, the faithful of all ages and nations may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance, ver. 15. To shew that it was necessary that the new covenant should be ratified by the death of Christ, ij2 4 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. iXa he compares it in this respect to a testament, which is of no force or validity till ratified by the death of the testator, ver. 16, 17. Accordingly God's covenants vs^ith sinful men have ever since the fall, been made and ratified by the death and blood of sacrifice : and this, he particularly observes, was the case with the first or Sinaitic covenant, which was solemnly ratified and dedicated by slaying sacrifices and sprinkling the blood on the book and people, ver. 18, 19,20. — That Moses afterwards likewise sprinkled with blood both the tabernacle and all the vessels of the ministry; nay, that almost all things are according to the law, purified with blood, and that without shedding of blood there is no remission, ver. 21, 22. — That it was indeed necessary that the representations of the heavenly holy places should be purified, or made accessible, by the blood of slain animals ; but this only shewed that the heavenly holy places them- selves required a better sacrifice to render them accessible, namely, that of the Son of God, ver. 23. Accordingly he observes, that Christ hath not entered with his sacrifice into the holy places made with hands, which were only the figures of the true holy places ; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our account, ver. 24. — Nor was it necessary to this end that he should offer himself often, as the high-priest en- teretli into the earthly holy place with fresh blood of animals every year ; for as his death on enrth would have been necessary to every such offering CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 5 he must in that case have often suffered smce the foundation of the world : But now once, at the conclusion of the ages, he hath been manifested to abolish all farther sin-offerings, by the one effec- tual sacrifice of himself, ver. 25, 26. And as it is appointed to men to die but once as the punish- ment of Adam's sin, and after that to be judged according to their personal conduct; so Christ was offered but once to bear the sins of many ; and having thereby obtained eternal redemption for them (ver. 12.) he will appear a second time to them who wait for him ; not to offer another sacri- fice for sin, but to put them iu possession of eternal salvation, ver. 27. 28. PARAPHRASE. Chap. IX. 1. Now the first covenant indeed had both ordinances of worship, and a worldly sanctuary or holy place. 2. For a tabernacle was prepared consisting of two apartments^ the first in which was the candle- stick, and the table, and the shew-bread ; which Jirst apartment is called The JJolj place. 3. And behind the second vail there is the inner tabernacle, which is called The Holy of Holies ; 4. Having the golden censer on which the high- priest burned incense when he entered there, and the ark of the covenant, covered every where without und within with gold, in which inner tabernacle were 6 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. also the golden pot having- the manna, and the rod of Aaron which budded, and within the ark the tables of the covenant ; 5. And above it the Cherubim of glory, with outstretched wings overshadowing the mercy-seat, or cover oftlie ark, where the glory of the Lord rested as on a throne ; concerning which things it is not now my design to speak particularly. 6. Now these things being thus prepared, the ordinary priests go indeed at all times into the first or outer tabernacle, accomplishing the services : 7. But into the second, or inner tabernacle, the high-priest alone goeth once every year, not with- out blood, which he offereth for his own and the people's sins of ignorance : 8. The Holy Spirit, by excluding all others from the inner tabernacle, signifying this, that the way of the true holy place, represented by that inner taber- 7iacle, was not yet made manifest while the first tabernacle had a standing. 9. Which was a parable, or figurative representa- tion, unto the present time, in which both gifts and sacrifices are ofiered, which cannot, with respect to conscience, make perfect him who worshippeth God. 10. Only with offerings of meats and drinks, and with divers immersions, and ordinances re- specting the purifying of the flesh, imposed imtil the time of reformation. 11. But Christ being come, an High-priest of future good things, jyrocured through the services of CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 7 a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands, that is, not of this creation : 12. Neither by the blood of goats, and of calves, but by his own blood, he entered once into the heavenly holy places, having obtained eternal re- demption ybr us. 13. For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanc- tify to the purifying of the {ienh. from ceremonial deJilemenfSf and fit them for admission to the taber- nacle worship, 14. How much more shall the blood of Christ, who, through the eternal Spirit, offered himself without fault to God, cleanse your conscience from the guilt of dead works to serve the living God? 15. And for this reason he is the mediator of the new covenant, that death being undergone for the redemption of the transgressions committed against the first covenant, the caAled and faitliful may re- ceive the promise of the eternal inheritance. 16. 17ds new covenant which lias the promise of tlie eternal inJieritance, may he compared to a last will or testament in respect of its ratification ; for where a confirmed testament is, the death of the testator must necessarily be brought in. 17. For a testament is firm over the dead ; otherwise it hath not any force whilst the testator liveth : So neither was the new covenant confirmed withoiU the death or sacrifice of Christ. 8 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. 18. Hence it is that the first or Sinailic covenant was not dedicated without blood. 19. For when Moses had spoken every precept, according to the law, to all the people, taking the blood of calves and of goats with water, and scar- let wool, and hyssop, Jie sprinkled both the book of the law itself Siwd all the people, 20. Saying-, "This ^.9 the blood of the covenant " which God hath enjoined unto you," Exod. xxiv. 7, 8. 21. Moreover, both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the divine service which were afterwards made and set in order, he in like manner sprinkled with blood. 22. And almost all things are, according to the law, cleansed with sacrificial blood ; and without shedding of blood there is no remission of sins. 23. It was therefore necessary indeed that the typical representations of things in the heavens, such as the tabernacle and all its sacred utensils, should be cleansed by these sacrifices ; but the heavenly things themselves, which they typified, by better sa- crifices than these. 24. For Christ hath not entered 7vith his sacrifice into the holy places made with hands, which are only figures [Gr. antitypes] of the true holy places; but into heaven itself, now to appear in the immedi- diate presence of God on our account. 25. Nor did he enter there that he might offer himself often, as the high-priest entereth into the CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 9 holy places every year with other blood tJmn his own; 26. For then he must often have suffered death since the foundation of the world ; but now once, at the conclusion of the ages, he hath been mani- fested to abolish all farther sin-offering by the sa- crifice of himself. 27. And like as it is appointed to men to die but once, on account of the sin of the first man, and after that the judgment takes place ; 28. Even so the Christ having been offered once to bear away the sins of many, will, to them that wait for him, appear a second time without a sin- off'ering unto tJieir complete salvation. COMMENTARY AND NOTES ON CHAP. IX. Ver. 1. Then verily the first covenant —J Many co- pies read ^ zs^u% axmri, the first tabernacle, and others of good authority have only •h it^ofln, the first, without the substantive, which some think should be tabernacle, and others covenant. Those of the former opinion go back to ver. 5. of the preceding chapter for the connection, where the tabernacle and its service is mentioned, and consider all that follows respecting the two covenants, from that to this, as included in a parenthesis. But it is more natural, and suits the apostle's argument at least equally well, to understand by the first here, the Sinaitic covenant, which is twice termed the first in the foregoing chapter, ver. 7, 13, and also twice expressly mentioned,^ ver. 9. Besides, tabernacle here would make a tautology in this 10 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. with the beginning* of ver. 2. For these reasons I think our English translators have very properly supplied the word covenant in this place. The apostle observes, that the first or Sinaitic covenant — had also ordinances of divine service — ] It had a va- riety of ceremonial and typical ordinances of religious worship pertaining* to it, and which were to be performed by the priests in behalf of the people, exactly according to the manner prescribed. — and a zoorldly sanctuary,'\ Two things belonged to the first covenant. It had both ordinances of divine ser- vice, and a holy place fitted up for, and appropriated to the celebration of these divine ordinances. As the word sanctuary is commonly used to signify a place of refuge, safety, and protection, and not of divine service, I think that ayiov here should have been translated holy place, as it literally signifies. It is sometimes used to distinguish the outer apartment of the tabernacle, from the inner or most holy place, as in Exod. xxvi. 33. Heb. ix. 2. At other times, it is used more largely, and comprehends the whole of that sacred edifice or tent which Moses erected in the wilderness, and is most frequently termed the taber- nacle, as in chap. viii. 5. and in this sense I understand the word a.yiQi) to be used here. It is termed aym xoaixixov a worldly sanctuary, or holy place, not to distinguish it from the inner apartment of the tabernacle, or holy of holies, which was a figure of heaven, nor because it was a representation of the world, or universe, as some have imagined ; but it is so called because it was placed on earth, made of worldly materials, and with human hands, M'hich things apply to the whole of the Mosaic tabernacle ; and it is also termed worldly, by way of opposition to sTrsgaviov or heavenly, chap. viii. 5. namely, heaven itself, where Christ has entered to exercise his ministry, see chap. ix. 11,12,24. and of which that worldly holy place was only a figure. The apostle now proceeds to describe this worldly holy CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 11 place or tabernacle, and its outer and inner apartments, with their respective utensils. Ver. 2. For there was a tabernacle made — "] Its whole structure, and all that pertained to it, was prepared and fitted up exactly according to the model which God shewed to Moses on the mount, chap. viii. 5. We may observe here, that the apostle's reasoning in this epistle respecting the place of worship, and the priestly services, is founded on the original institution of the tabernacle and its ser- vices by Moses, and not on the temple and its services as appointed by David and Solomon, though these also were under divine direction. As to the dimensions and form of the Mosaic tabernacle, it was thirty cubits:, or forty-five feet in length, ten cubits, or fifteen feet in breadth, and the same in height, so that it formed an oblong square. It was divided into two parts, which are spoken of as tabernacles ; — the first — ] Namely, tabernacle, meaning the first di- vision of it, or that part of it which presented itself first in entering from without. This was that sacred apartment — wherein was the candlestick — ] The candlestick was placed towards the south, it weighed a talent of beaten gold and was all of one piece ; from its shaft proceeded six branches, three on each side, and a seventh in the middle, with a lamp on the top of each of them, con- taining pure olive oil and a wick for burning. These were trimmed and recruited by the ofliciating priest every morning and evening. See Exod. xxv. 31 — 39. chap, xxvii. 20. Who would have thought that a late learned and judicious commentator should not only imagine,, that " the outward tabernacle was a representation of the " mundane system," but also suppose, with Josephus, " that the seven lamps of the candlestick were emblems of " the seven planets, whereby our world is enlightened 1" — and the table, — ] This table was made of Shittim wood, and was placed towards the north; it was iwo cubits, or three feet in length, and one cubit, or afooC and 12 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. a half in breadth, and a cubit and a half, or two feet three inches in heig-ht, and was covered over with pure gold. See Exod. xxv. 23—26. — and the shew-bread; — ] The Hebrew literally is the bread of the face, or, of the presence ; the Greek here is ri TrgoQeffjiT rwv a§7wv, and imports the loaves or cakes which were set before the face of the Lord in the holy place. These loaves were twelve in number, according to the number of the tribes of Israel, and they were placed on the golden table before mentioned, in two rows or piles, six in a pile one above another. They were of a considerable size, as each of them contained two tenth deals of fine flour, which some reckon about six wine pints. Every Sabbath day fresh loaves were placed on the table, and the stale ones removed, which none were permitted to eat but the family of Aaron, and that in the holy place. See Lev. xxiv. 3 — 9. Mat. xii. 4. The commentator above alluded to, considers the twelve loaves of the shew-bread as " a representation of the pro- " ductions of the earth, by which the lives of men and " beasts are sustained." So that, according to him, all the things hitherto mentioned represented nothing of a spirit- ual, but only of a worldly and material nature. But it is plain that the whole tabernacle, with its furniture and priestly services, were shadowy representations of hea- venly things, chap. viii. 5. though the apostle's design in this verse is not to explain the mystical meaning of the particulars mentioned, but to shew that they belonged to that part of the tabernacle "* — which is called the sanctuary.'] That is, the first apartment of the tabernacle, called ayix, Holy or Holies ; for, as Peirce observes, " It is doubtful whether we " are to take ayja, to be plural, and so to render it the *' sanctuary, or whether we should read it in the siugu- " lar ayix, and so turn the place with our margin. Which " [first tabernacle] is called holy'' The sense, however, is the same. CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 13 Ver. 3. A fid after the second vail, the tabernacle which is called the holiest of all/] A first vail is 'here implied, and it was that which covered the entry into the first apart- ment or holy place, of which we read, Exod. xxvi. 3(5,37. chap, xxxvi. 37. The second vail was that which sepa- rated the inner from the outer apartment of the tabernacle, Exod. xxvi. 31^ — 33. xxxi. 35. It was a large curtain of various colours, and of very curious workmanship. See Exod. xxvi. 31 — 35. After, or behind this second vail there was the tabernacle, or that inner part of the taber- nacle which is called the Holiest of all, uyix ouyim literally the Holy of Holies, it being as it were the presence cham- ber of the God of Israel, where he fixed his dwellins: and throne among them, and manifested himself in the most illustrious emblems of majesty and glory ; and to Him as dwelling there, all their religious worship was directed, it being a representation of heaven. It was this glorious place Ver. 4. Which had the golden censer, — ] The censer was a kind of vessel in which live coals were put for burn- ing incense, and its use on the day of the yearly atone- ment is thus described, " And he," viz. the high-priest, '' shall take a censer full of burning coals of fire from off'the " altar before the Lord, and his hands full of sweet incense *' beaten small, and bring it within the vail : And he shall " put the incense upon the fire before the Lord, that the *' cloud of incense may cover the mercy-seat that is upon •' the testimony, that he die not." Lev. xvi. 12, 13. Some suppose that the golden altar is here meant and not the golden censer, and that though it was not situated within the holy of holies, yet it may be said to have had it in respect of use ; but I know of no reading that favours this opinion : The holy of holies had the golden censer even as it had the ark ; for the word £x«^« equally refers to both, and imports that they were contained in it, which the golden altar never was. I therefore understand the apostle to mean the golden censer as is here expressed. 14 A COMMENTARY ON [c HAP. IX. and which Josephus also testifies was kept in the holy of holies, Lib. il. contra Apjnon. But as the high-priest durst not enter the holy of holies at all without carrying with him the censer with the burning coals and incense, a ques- tion occurs how he could come by the censer if it was kept there ? To this it is answered, that it might be placed there just within the vail, and within reach of his hand, so that he could take it hence without entering into it himself. — and the ark of the covenant overlaid round about with gold. — "] The mQcJIos, or ark, was a chest three feet nine inches in length, two feet three inches in breadth, and the same in height. See Exod. xxxvii. 1. It is termed, the ark of the covenaiit, because it contained the two tables of the covenant, as they are afterwards called. It was a rich and most beautiful piece of workmanship, being over- laid round about with gold. We are told that Bezaleel *' over-laid it with pure gold within and without, and made *' a crown of gold to it round about." Exod. xxxvii. 2. This crown of gold seems to have been a border round the top of it, both for ornament, and for fixing- the lid or mercy-seat more firmly upon it. — wherein was the golden pot that had manna, — ] As it is expressly said " There was nothing in the ark, save " the two tables of stone which Moses put there at Horeb, 1 Kings viii. 9. and 2 Chron. v. 10. it is thought that the words ev ^ zoherein or in which, refer to annv-n the tabernacle^ called the holiest of all, and that the sense is, " in which " tabernacle was the golden pot," &c. Or, if the pronoun 7) refers to the ark, which is more likely, it may be ex- plained by what Moses commanded respecting the book of the law which he had written, probably the whole penta- teuch ; " Take this book of the law, and put it in the side of the ark," Deut. xxxi.26,thatis, in a repository fixed to the sideoftheark (SeeAiNSwoRTHandPATRicK on that place). In like manner, the golden pot and Aaron's rod might be deposited in or Jiy the side of the ark, for they were not put within it. In this golden pot was put an omer, or CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 15 about six pints of the manna wherewith God fed the chil- dren of Israel forty years in the wilderness, and it was laid up before the Lord to be kept as a memorial for their generations. See Exod. xvi. 33, 34. — and AarorCs rod that budded, — ] This rod of Aaron though but a dry stick, yet the Lord caused it not only to bud, but to blosvsom and bear almonds, to shew that he had chosen the house of Aaron to the priesthood in preference to all otheiTS ; therefore it was laid up before the testimony in the holy of holies, as a token and memorial of this* See Num. xvii.2 — 11. — and the tables of the covenant : — ] Namely, the two tables of stone containing the Ten Commandments, which were written by the finger of God, Exod. xxxiv. 1. These were called, the tables of the covenant, Deut. ix. 9, 11, 15. because they contained the words of the covenant made with Israel, and also called the tables of the testimony or witness, Exod. xxxi. 18. xxxii. 15. because they were a standing witness of that covenant, and testified both what God required of them, and the obedience they had pro- mised; And as these tables were deposited within the ark, hence the ark itself was termed the ark of the testimony^ Exod. XXV. 22. chap. xxix. 35. Ver. 5. And over it the cherubim of glory, shadozoing the mercy-seat, — ] Over or above it, namely the ark which contained the tables of the covenant, were the cheru- bim. This is a name for an order of angels, who appear to have been attendants on the Scheehina, or visible glory of God. We read of their being placed at the east; ©f the garden of Eden to keep the way of the tree of life, Gen. iii. 24. Ezekiel describes the shape and appearance of those cherubim which he saw in vision, chap. i. 8 — 15. X. 1 — 22. On both these occasions they had a fiery, flam- ing, and flashing appearance, and seem to have been em- ployed as ministers of God's judgment upon sinners. How far the figures of the cherubim which were placed above the ark resembled these, is uncertain. They are here termed the cherubim of glory, not merely on account of their own 16 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IT. brightness, being- made of beaten gold, but cliiefly be- cause of their relation to the visible glory of the Lord. They were two in number, one at each end of the mercy- seat, and beaten out of the same mass with it. They over- shadowed the mercy-seat, viz. with their wings, a wing from each being stretched over it, till they both met in the middle and formed an arch ; their faces also were opposite to each other, looking iuM'ards towards the mercy-seat which was between them, Exod. xxv. 18, 19, 20. The tXas-ojgiov, mercy-seat, or propitiatory, was the lid or cover of the ark, called in Hebrew, Cophoreth, from copher, to cover, to appease, to expiate. On this the visible emblem of the divine presence rested as on a throne ; for indeed it was a type of God's glorious throne in heaven. It was by the high-priest's sprinkling the blood of the sacrifices on and before this mercy-seat, that the atonement for the nation of Israel was completed, Lev. xvi. 14, 15. On this the visible symbol of the glory of God appeared, and from thence he gave forth his oracles ; for he says to Moses, " There will I meet with thee, and I will commune with *' thee (Vyo) from upon the mercy-seat, from between ** the two cherubim, which are upon the ark of the testi- " mony, of all things which 1 will give thee in command- " ment unto the children of Israel." Exod. xxv. 22. Hence he is said to sit between the cherubim, Ps. xcix. 1. for there the mercy-seat was placed, and prayers were addressed to him, as dwelling there, to shine forth in favour of his people, Psal. Ixxx. 1. The apostle having mentioned the greater part of the sacred utensils of both the apartments of the tabernacle, adds, — of which we cannot now speak particularly. 2 Or " concerning which it is not my design at present to " speak particularly ;" that is, to give an explanation of the mystical or spiritual signification of each of these things in particular. But though he declines this, as it would detain him from coming directly to what he had chiefly in view ; yet his manner of declining it implies CHAP. IX.] THE F.PISTLF. TO TfiE HRIJREWS. 17 that each of these sacred utensils bad a mystical significa- tion. They -were all constructed in form, size, and sub- stance, according- to particular divine directions, see Exod. XXV. throughout. The apostle terms them "the example " and shadow of heavenly things," Heb. viii. 5. the '' pat- " terns of things in the heavens," chap. ix. 23. and these typical patterns included not only the tabernacle and its services, but every article of its furniture, as is plain from the Lord's words to Moses, " And let them make me a " sanctuary, that I may dwell amongst them : According- " to all that I shew thee, after the pattern of the taber- " nacle, and the pattern of all the instruments there- " of, even so shall ye make it." Exod. xxv. 8, 9. There are also other passages which seem to allude to, and even to explain some of these articles, such as the golden can- dlestick with its seven lamps, Rev. i. 12, 13, 20. — the golden censer, chap. viii. 3, 4. — the vail, Heb. x. 20. — the mercy-seat, or propitiatory, Rom. iii. 25. Heb. iv. 16. and perhaps the angelic cherubim, 1 Pet. i. 12. But as the apostle here declines giving a particular explanation of these things, I must be excused from attempting it. Ver. 6. Now when these things zcere thus ordained, — ] The tabernacle consisting of two apartments, with their respective utensils, being thus >ta7a:vith his own blood into the tabernacle of his own body or human na- ture, or that he is the minister of his human nature, as he is said to be of the true tabernacle. We are plainly told that Christ is " an High-priest who is set on the right " hand of the Blajesty in the heavens," Heb. viii. 1. This place therefore must be the sanctuary of which he is the minister, " and the true tabernacle which the Lord pitch- " ed and not man," ver. 2. and here must be the holy place into which he hath entered once as High-priest by his own blood, chap. ix. 12. So that if we want to know what that greater and more perfect tabernacle is, the apos- tle expressly informs us when he says, " Christ is not *' entered into the holy places made with hands, but, sis " av%-J TOV Hgavov, INTO HEAVEN ITSELF, DOW tO appear ill ** the presence of God for us," ver. 24. It is clear there- fore that the holy place into which Christ hath entered with his oblation, and of which he is the minister, is the highest heavens, where God displays his immediate and glorious presence, and which was typified by the holy of holies in the tabernacle and temple, and not' by the body or nature of the high-priest. Now Christ being made an High-priest of good things to come, and which were to be procured not by the services of the earthly tabernacle, but through the services of a greater and more perfect taber- nacle, not made with hands, nor of this creation ; Ver. 12. Neither by the blood of goats and calves^ but by his own blood, he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us.] By goats and calves the apostle alludes to the animals with the blood of which the Jewish high -priest entered into the holy place 2b' A COMMENTARY ON [cHAP. IX. on the day of the yearly expiation. He was to bring a young- bullock, (rendered by the LXX. /txoffj^or, a calf,) and, having killed it for a sin-offering, he was to enter with its blood within the vail, and sprinkle it on and before the raercy-seat, and thus make an atonement for himself and for his house, Lev. xvi. 3, 11, 14. He was also to take two goats for the people, present them before the Lord, cast lots upon them, and according* as the lot fell, one of them was to be slain for a sin-otTering, and its blood in like manner carried within the vail and sprinkled. The other goat was to be presented before the Lord to make an atonement w^ith it ; (for it was a sin-offering, though not slain, and it appears from ver. 5. that these two goats made but one sin-offering) ; then the priest, laying both his hands upon its head, was to confess over it all the iniquities of the children of Israel, putting them upon the head of the goat, and sending it away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness, ver. 10, 21,22. Thus, the sins of the whole nation were carried away from them. This ceremony of the live goat represented the transferring of guilt, or of the obligation to punishment, from the people to a substitute, as the killing of the other goat, carrying its blood within the vail and sprinkling it, represented the infliction of the punishment they deserved, upon the vic- tim substituted in their place, which being accepted as an atonement for their sins, they were acquitted. This Mas a most striktng prefiguration of the substitution and sa- crifice of Christ, concerning- whom it is said, " the Lord " laid on him the iniquities of us all — he bore the sins of " many," Isa. liii. 6, 12. " Who his own self bare our sins " in his own body on the tree," 1 Pet. ii. 24. — " he once " suffered for sins, the just for the unjust," chap. iii. 18. — " Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the la\y, being made a curse for us," Gal. iii. 13. Such expressions prove, beyond all reasonable contradiction, that our sins were charged to his account for satisfaction, and that he suffered the punishment of them, not merely for our be- CHAP. IX.] THK EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 27 iiefit, but in our stead. This is what the type prefigured, and what the gospel constantly and plainly declares. What the apostle says in this and the preceding verse is by way of contrast to the description he had given of the Mosaic tabernacle, and its priestly services. That was a worldly tabernacle made with hands ; but this is a greater and more perfect tabernacle, not of this creation. The Jewish High-priest entered into the most holy place of the typical tabernacle, on the great day of expiation, by the blood of the calf, (or young bullock) and goat ; but Christ entered into the most holy place of the true taber- nacle by his own blood. The Jewish high-priest entered yearly into the former to repeat the same service ; but Christ entered into the latter, ^(^azjx^, once for all. Far- ther, the Jewish high-priest, by the legal sacrifices, ob- tained only a temporal pardon for the sins committed during the preceding year ; but Christ, by his sacrifice, once offered, has obtained for us, ajwvjav Xulquoiv, eternal redemption, that is, an everlasting deliverance from the guilt and punishment of sin; consequently there can be no need for his offering himself a second time. See ver. 25. In the following two verses the apostle argues from the efficacy of the legal sacrifices and purifications to obtain the ends of their appointment, that the blood of Christ must be much more effectual in obtaining the higher ends for which it was shed and offered. • Ver. 13. For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer, sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh f] In the foregoing verse he had mentioned calves; but in this and chap, x. 4. he terms them bulls. There are two words used in the Hebrew, gnagel and par, which the Jewish doctors distinguish thus: gnagel, they say, is a calf of the first year, and par a young bullock of the second year ; now, as the calf and bullock were both males of the same species, differing only in age, and as the Jews never dismembered the males of their 28 A COMMENTARY ON [CIIAP. IX. cattle, as is commonly done with us, so they Mere both properly bulls; for no defective animals were to be of- fered in sacrifice to the Lord. See Lev. xxii. 19 — 26. Besides the hlood of bulls and of goats, the apostle mentions the ashes of an heifer. The ordinance of the heifer we find in Num. xix. It was to be a red heifer or young* cow without blemish, upon which never yoke came. She was to be taken without the camp, slain in the pre- sence of the priest, who was to sprinkle of her blood with his finofer seven times before the tabernacle of the con- gregation: then she was to be burnt entire with all that pertained to her, and into the midst of the fire the priest was to throw cedar-wood, hyssop, and scarlet wool ; and the whole being- reduced to ashes, these v.ere to be ga- thered up and kept for use ; so that when persons were defiled (Gr. made common), by touching- the dead, or by any other means, these ashes, being- mixed with running- water, were sprinkled upon them, and by this rite, they were cleansed from the external and ceremonial impuri- ties of their flesh or body, and readmitted to the public worship and congregation of the Lord, from which their uncleanness had excluded them. This institution had something of the nature of a sin-offering ; for it is said to be " a purification for sin," or, as the Hebrew expresses it, " it is sin," ver. 9. Now, though the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an»heifer, had no natural or intrinsic virtue in them, to sanctify or purify any thing, even outwardly, far less to cleanse internally from moral impurity ; yet since, by virtue of divine appointment, these carnal ordinances so far sanctified as to purify the flesh or body from legal defilements, and fit the Israelites for approaching to God in his worship ; Ver. 14. How much more shall the blood of Christ, who, through the eternal Spirit, offered himself without spot to God, purge your conscience from dead works to serve the living God .?] What the apostle here affirms is CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 29 this, that the blood of Christ is much more effectual to cleanse the conscience from dead works, than the blood of bulls and goats, &c. was to purify the flesh or body from ceremonial defilements. This superior efKcacy does not arise merely from appointment, for the blood of the legal sacrifice was also appointed of God : It must therefore arise chiefly from the superior nature and intrinsic fitness of the means. The leffal sacrifices were mean brute animals, greatly inferior in nature to those for whom they were offered ; and their blood had no moral influence to cleanse the conscience, nor so much as any natural virtue to purify the body, that being merely tbe effect of institution. But the blood of Christ is the blood of a per- son of infinite dignity and Avorth, as described chap, i, who assumed a pure and spotless human nature, that he might be a proper substitute for his people, and be capable of dying in their stead, as a sacrifice for their sins, chap. ii. 9 — 18. It is the blood of God's dear and only begotten Son, who, in obedience to his father's command- ment, voluntarily laid down his life for the sheep, John X. 17, 18. It must therefore be infinitely precious in his Father's sight, and of sufficient worth and efficacy to satisfy his justice, and so to purify the conscience of believers. It is said, that he offered himself to God without spot,. It was a necessary qualification of all the legal sacrifices^ that they should be without any bodily deformity, defect^ or blemish of any kind, otherwise they could not be ac- cepted on God's altar, Lev. xxii. 20—25. Mai. i. 8, 13, 14 This was only a figure of Christ's moral purity and spotless holiness of heart and life, for he knew no sin, chap. iv. 15* 2 Cor. V. 21. Hence his precious redeeming blood is likened to that of a lamb without blemish and without spot, I Pet. i. 19. Farther, he thus offered himself through the eternal Spirit. A number of Greek MSS. and the Vulgate version, instead of eternal Spirit, read holy Spirit,' but 30 A COMMENTARY ON [cHAP. IX. most MSS. together with tlie ancient Syriac version, sup- port the common reading. It is, perhaps, hard to deter- mine wljich of them is the true reading, but either of them may bear a sound sense. Some explain it thus, that he through the Holy Spirit, by which he was sanctified from the womb, offered himself on the cross without spot to God : Others thus, That having been put to death in the flesh as a sacrifice, he, through the Spirit which quickened and raised him from the dead, (1 Pet. iii. 18.) entered as High-priest into the heavenly holy place, and there presented his sacrifice without fault to God. This agrees better with the scope of the preceding- and follow- ing context, in which the apostle is comparing Christ's ministry in heaven with that of the Aaronical high-priest within the vail on the great day of atonement. See Chap, viii. 1 — 5. ix. 12, 24 But others by the eternal Spirit, understand Christ's divine nature. Peirce observes, " That the nature of our author's argument seems to lead *' us to consider this Spirit as signifying the Logos or '* divine nature of our Lord, since he is setting forth the " intrinsic worth and excellency of his offering." This sense I prefer, both for the reason given, and because his human natme, abstractly considered, however spotless and pure, does not sufficiently account for the efficacy ascribed to his sacrifice ; but his human nature being per- sonally united to his divine, must derive infinite worth from that union, and abundantly account for all the efficacy ascribed to his offering. Here it is said to purify the con- science from dead works, and that more etfectually than the legal sacrifices and sprinklings could purify the flesh from ceremonial uncleanness. Dead works are sins which deserve death according to the sentence of the law of God. See the same expression chap. vi. 1. The conscience is that judgment we form of our own conduct as good or evil, and by which we either justify or condemn ourselves accordingly. An evil con- science is an accusing conscience, by which a man is con- CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 31 derailed of himself, John viii. 9. Tit. iii. 11. I Joliu iii.20. A good conscie?ice is that which gives a favourable testi- mony to the godly sincerity and uprightness of a man's own conversation, Actsxxiii. 1. 2 Cor. i. 12. 1 Tim. i. 15, 19. Heb. xiii. 18. 1 Pet. iii. 16. But a purified conscience, of which the apostle here speaks, supposes its previous defilement with the guilt of dead works, and its purifica- tion from that is ascribed entirely to the blood of Christ ; so that it must be a sacrificial purification by means of his making expiation or atonement for sin. And though it has not this effect upon the conscience till it is believed to be a sufficient ground of pardon and acceptance with God ; yet still it is the blood of Christ, the object of be- lief, that produceth the effect; for nothing can warrant- ably satisfy a guilty conscience, but that which has fully satisfied the justice of God, and which he hath set forth to be a propitiation for a demonstration of his righteousness in the remission of sins, Rom. iii. 25,26. This purification of the conscience of sinners by the blood of Christ is necessary for fitting them to serve the living God: For till the heart is sprinkled from an evil con- science by the blood of Christ, till it is freed in some measure from the fear of wrath and reconciled to God, sinners are not possessed of that faith, love, holy confi- dence and freedom which are necessary to the acceptable service of him : And to expect access to, or acceptance in the service of a holy God on their own account, or on any account whatever, but through the oblation and inter- cession of Christ, must be the effect of self-confidence and presumption, the opposite of that reverence and godly fear with which the living God must be served, who has declared, " I will be sanctified in them that come nigh unto " me," Heb. xii. 28. Lev. x. 3. The apostle having set forth the superior efficacy of the blood of Christ to that of the legal sacrifices, par- ticularly in purifying the conscience for the service' of God, he adds, 32 A COMMENTARY ON [cHAP. 1\'. Ver. 15. A/ut for this cause he is the mediator of the nevi testament — ] For this cause or reason that his bhjod is so efficacious, he is the mediator of the new covenant. As he is the sacrifice by whose blood that covenant is procured and ratified, it is hig^hly proper that he sliould be the Mediator or High-priest of it, by and through whose ministration its blessings are dispensed. For the sense of the word Mediator as applied to Christ, see note on chap, viii.6. The word ^;a^a5Kr), which, in this and the five following verses, is translated tedament, I have rendered covenant, because the Hebrew berith, to which it answers, always signifies a covenant ; because our translators ordinarily so render it ; and because it is here connected with the blood of sacrifice, a priest and mediator, which things do not belong to a last will or testament, but only to a covenant. See note on chap, vii. 22. Now Christ is the Mediator of the new covenant, — that by means of death, for the redemption of the trans- gressions that were under the first testament, they icho are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.'] These words may be thus rendered : '* That his death " (ysvoiMsvisy being accomplished for the redemption of the '' transgressions (sttj) against the first covenant, (pi xsxXyj- /xEvoi) the called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance." Though the death of Christ was not accomplished till the fulness of the time was come, Gal. iv. 4. or at the con- clusion of the ages, Ilel). ix. 26. yet it extends its efficacy backwards to the entrance of sin, and forward to the end of time, as the procuring- cause of the remission of sins and eternal life. The faith of God's ancient people was di- rected forward to the coming of Christ by promises, types, and prophecies, both before and under the old covenant. That was the time of God's forbearance Qia. Twv zsijcqsniv zsqoy syovolcov oe.y^a.^nyioi.ruv) in the passing' by of the sins committed before an atonement was made for them, though in the foresight of it; for then his righte- CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HKI5RFWS. ^^ ousness or justice was not fully demonstrated till he set forth Christ to be a propitiation through faith in his blood; and by this he has given full proof of his justice and faithfulness to his promise, not only in justifying- all who shall henceforward believe in Jesus, but also all who from the beginning believed the promise and design of his coming, Rom. iii. 25, 26. One end of Christ's death, we are told, was " for the " redemption," i. e. expiation, " of the transgressions " against the first covenant." By the Jirst covenant he certainly means the covenant made at Sinai, for he after- wards shews that Moses dedicated it with blood, ver. 18. And this redemption of the transgressions against the first covenant was not merely to free from the punishment of them, but also that " the called might receive the pro- *' mise of eternal inheritance, or rather the promised eter- *' nal inheritance ;" the promise being sometimes put for the thing promised. By the called, we are not to understand all who are the objects of the gospel call, M'hich extends to all without exception who have access to hear it ; for, in this sense, our Lord declares that " many are called " but few chosen," Mat. xxii. 14. ; and this he illustrates in the preceding parable, where he also shews that some who to appearance comply with this call, will at last be rejected, ver. 11,12,13. But the called here signify true believers, who really comply with the call ; and are described to be the called according to God's purpose, he having foreknown and predestinated them to be conformed to the image of his Son, and whom he also justifies and glorifies, Rom. viii. 28 — 31. That to which they are called is not merely the enjoyment of the outward privileges of God's professing people in this world, as some conceive; " but to the obtaining of " the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ," 2 Thess. ii. 14. " to obtain the salvation that is in Christ Jesus, with " eternal glory," 2 Tim. ii. 10. See also 1 Thess. ii. 12. 1 Pet. V. 10. Accordingly, the apostle, in the passage Vol. II. D 34 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. TX. before us, represents the ultimate design of Christ's death to be, that " the called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance," that is, eternal life. On this verse the learned Mr. Peirce says, " This " passage appeared to me very difficult, and well deserves ** to be more exactly considered than I think it has yet ** been ; for I pretend not to speak with any great cer- " tainty of the interpretation I shall offer." His interpre- tation is, that the redemption of the transgressions against the first covenant has a particular respect to the Jews, but that the called who shall receive the promise of the eternal inheritance, include both Jews and Gentiles ; but not being himself fully satisfied with this, he concludes with saying-, " a better account of this verse will be very acceptable to me." But as from the redemption of Jewish transgressions we cannot infer, that Gentiles are included among- the called, who receive the promise of eternal in- heritance, so the connection between these two things remains yet unexplained. The verse ascribes a twofold effect or end to Christ's death ; first, it was '' for the redemption or expiation of •' the transgressions against the first covenant :" And, secondly, that " the called might receive the promise of ** eternal inheritance." In other words, Christ by his death, hath procured for the called both the remission of their sins and eternal life, and the former in order to make way for the latter; for none can inherit eternal life till their transgressions are first expiated and pardoned : so that both parts of the verse respect the same persons, namely, the called; and therefore we cannot restrict the former part of it to the Jews, and extend the latter part to both Jews and Gentiles ; for the whole verse makes but one sentence, so connected and constructed as not to admit of introducing any among the called but such as are redeemed from the transgressions against the first covenant. If this is admitted, then the only question that remains to be solved is this, Whether does the whole verse CHAP.^ IX.] THE KPISTLE TO THE IIF.RRRWS. 35 respect the called both of Jews and G«ntiles, or the called among- the Jews only? Before giving a direct answer to this question, it may be proper to consider what may be said on both sides of it. If this verse is to be explained by the current doctrine of the apostle in his epistles to the Gentile churches, Avhere he constantly affirms that there is no difference between Jewish and Gentile believers in Christ, either as to their receiving the remission of sins or eternal life, Rom. x. 12, 13, Gal. iii. 28, 29. Eph. ii. 13—22, then the called here must be understood not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles, according to Rom. ix. 24. But then it may be asked, how the Gentiles came to be transgressors of the first or Sinaitic covenant, since they were never under it? In answer to this we may suppose that the apostle only means what is commonly called the moral laio, which was originally written in the heart of man as the law of nature or creation, and is here called the first covenant, because it was explicitly published by the voice of God in that co- venant, Exod. XX. 1 — 18. and also written with his own finger on two tables of stone, chap, xxxii. 15, 16. xxxiv. 1,28. — 1st, Because Moses frequently calls this law the covenant. The tables on which it Avas written he repeat- edly terms the tables of the covenant., Deut. ix. 9, 11, 15. The ten words or precepts written on them w^ere the loords of the covenant, Exod. xxxiv. 28. and they are expressly called " his covenant, which he commanded them to per- form," Deut. iv. 13. Whatever was of a temporal or ty- pical nature in that covenant was peculiar to the nation of Israel, and the rest of mankind were not bound by it ; but all mankind are indispensably bound to obey the moral law, it being founded on their relation to God as their Creator, and to one another as possessing one common nature. — 2d, Because it is by the transgressions of the moral law that the apostle proves both Jews and Gentiles to be all under sin, and that the whole world is become guilty before God, and so liable to punishment, Rom. iii. D 2 36 A COMMENTARY ON [cHAP. IX. But (lie Gentiles were not sinners, nor liable to punish- ment by transgressing- the peculiar institutions of the first covenant to which they were never bound. — 3d, Because Christ by his death hath redeemed Gentiles as well as Jews from the curse of the law : So the apostle says, " Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, be- " ing- made a curse for us : — That the blessing of Abra- " ham might come on the Gentiles ; that we might receive " the promise of the Spirit through faith," Gal. iii. 13, 14. The blessing of Abraham is that which God promised and confirmed to him in Christ long before the law was given at Sinai, ver. 17. viz. "In thee shall all nations be blessed," which is explained to be a promise, " that God would justify the heathen through faith," ver. 8. Now the law, from the curse of which the Gentiles were redeemed, must be the moral law contained in the ten commandments, and this, perhaps, is what the apostle means by the Jirst cove- fiant ; and if so, the passage under consideration may in- clude both Jews and Gentdes, who were equally trans- srressors of that law. On the other side of the question it may be urged, — 1st, That though Moses calls the decalog-ue or moral law tlie covenant and the zcords of the covenant ; yet where- ever this occurs the connection demonstrates he does not mean that it was a covenant made with the heathen, but only with the Israelites who are constantly distinguished from them, and whom God thus separated from all other nations of the earth, to be a peculiar people to himself, Exod. xix. 5, 6. And though all mankind were indis- pensably bound to observe the law of nature or creation ; yet it was not formally and expressly delivered and com- mitted to other nations in the form of a covenant made with them, as it was to the nation of Israel. Besides, there were a number of peculiar statutes, judgments, and ordi- nances belonging to that covenant which the Gentile na- tions were not bound to observe. In a word, God gave such singular manifestations of himself and of his will to CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 37 Israel, as he never did to any other people in the world. Of this Moses reminds them in the most striking language when exhorting them to obedience. See Deut. iv. 7, 8, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 ; and the Psalmist says, " He sheweth " his words unto Jacob, his statutes and his judgments " unto Israel. He hath not dealt so with any nation ; and " his judgments they have not known them." Psal. cxlvii. 19, 20. — 2d, The apostle in this epistle to the Hebrews, terms the covenant made with their fathers the first cove- nant, in five places ; yet in none of them does he restrict that terra to the moral law or ten commandments ; but evidently includes in it the M'hole of the Mosaic constitu- tion, and that as distinguished from the second or neio co- venant: Nay, he calls the first the old covenant, which decay eth, and is ready to vanish away, Heb. viii. 13. which cannot be absolutely affirmed of the moral law, which is not made void, but established by the gospel, Rom. iii. 31. in which it is given in a more excellent manner, Heb. viii. 10. — 3d, As he is writing to the Hebrews, and men- tions the transgressions of the first covenant, he must have had the Jews particularly in view who had been under that covenant, and had still too much dependance on, and attachment to its institutions. To bring- them ofl' from these things, and attach them more firndy to Christ, he, in the 15th verse, and the preceding context, shews them, that it was not by the priesthood, sacrifices, and bodily purifications of the first covenant that either they, or any of the called of their nation, ever obtained the pardon of their transgressions under that covenant, or a title to the eternal inheritance, but solely by the death or sacrifice of Christ, the Mediator of the new covenant. This I take to be the sense of the passage, and it cer- tainly agrees with the main scope of the epistle, as well as with the promise of the new covenant in Jer. xxxi. 31. which had the beginning of its accomplishment among the Jews, as Peter declares, " Unto you first, God having " raised up his Son Jesus, sent him to bless you, in turn- 88 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. *' ing- away every one of you from his iniquities," Acts iii. 26. But though the promises were addressed to the Jews, and apph'ed to them in the first instance, (and there is ground to hope will be more fully accomplished to them in the latter days, Rom, xi. 25, 33.) ; yet it was without any prejudice to the Gentiles, who are included in the promise made to Abraham, Gen. xii. 3. xxii. 18. and who by faith in Christ became the children of God and Abra- ham's seed, and so fellow-heirs with them, and of the same body and partakers of his promise in Christ by the gospel. Gal. iii. 26, 29. Eph. iii, 6. This the apostle abundantly shews in his epistles to the Gentile churches, but never expressly mentions the Gentiles in this epistle. The apostle having- mentioned the death of Christ as Mediator of the new covenant with the design of it, he proceeds to shew the necessity of his death, particularly with respect to the ratification of that covenant. Ver, 16, For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator.'] If in all the word of God ^lu^Yixv) ever signifies a testament or last will, it must be in this passage, where it is connected with ^laS-e- jXEvoi, which is translated testator. But though these tMO words in other Greek authors frequently signify a testa- ment and testator, as our translators have here rendered them ; yet it may be justly questioned if ever they have that signification in the sacred writings. I have formerly shewn (see note on chap, vii, 22.) that the Hebrew herith invariably signifies a covenant, and that the LXX, always render it ^Kz^rmr) ; accordingly, our English translators have constantly rendered it covenant throughout the Old Testament, and in most places where it occurs in the New : But in this and some other places they have changed the term into testament, and that even in some citations from the Old Testament, where they had formerly used the word covenant. Some are of opinion, that the new cove- nant has also the nature of a testament, because its bless- ing's are all procured and ratified by the death of Christ, CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 39 and most freely bestowed ; and that therefore Sia^nxyi may be rendered either testament or covenant as translators choose : just as they have rendered the word ixaqlvqix by the words record, witness, and testimony. But the case is different ; for these three words convey the same idea, but testament and covenant do not. And though they may be compared in certain circumstances, such as their ratifica- tion by death ; yet even in that they do not exactly agree ; for there is a difference between the natural death of a testator, and the violent death of a victim, or sacrifice, by which covenants were anciently made and ratified, and especially such covenants as were between God and sinful men, in which the death and blood of sacrifices were ne- cessary as well for expiation and atonement, as for rati- fication. See Gen. viii. 20, 21. ix. 8 — 12. Exod. xxiv. 3—9. Psalm 1.5. Zech.ix. 11. Farther, the scope of the apostle's reasoning in the con- text does not seem to agree with the idea of a testament and testator. In ver. 14. he sets forth the superior effica- cy of Christ's blood to that of the legal sacrifices. In ver. 15. he shews, that for this cause he is the Mediator of the new covenant, that his death being accomplished for the redemption, or expiation, of the transgressions of the first covenant, the called might receive the promise of the eter- nal inheritance. Then he begins this 16th verse with the connecting word for, which shews that he is giving an ad- ditional reason for the death of Christ, namely, that it was necessary for ratifying the covenant: So that if in ver. 16, 17. he refers to a testator's ratifying- his last will by his death, it can be only in the way of comparison, to illustrate the point of ratification, as I have observed in the para- phrase, for he does not affirm that the new covenant is a testament, or that Christ is a testator ; and it was below the dignity of the inspired apostle to play upon the am- biguity of words. It is plain, however, that what he says in the context will not apply to a proper testament ; for a testament did not require a mediator, nor was it ratified 40 A COMMENTARY ON * [CHAP. IX. by the blood of sacrifice, nor was the death of tlie testa- tor for the redemption or expiation of transgressions. These things belonged to a covenant, not to a testament. Christ then is not the Mediator of a testament, as our translators have represented him, any more than he is the testator of a covenant. Prirce, Macknight, and several others, have given it as their opinion, that even in ver. 16, 17, the apostle does not refer either to a testament or testator, but to the ancient manner of making and confirming covenants by the death and blood of sacrifice. We have seen that ^la^nyi-n signifies a covenant, but the chief difticulty here, rests on the word ha^sixsvos, which in other authors frequently signifies a testator, as our version has it. In the versions of Dod- dridge, Wesley, Wakefield, it is expressed by aperi- ])hrasis, and rendered " that by which it is confirmed," or " that which establisheth," viz. the covenant: but if a sin- gle term can be found to express the sense of the original word, it is certainly preferable. Peirce renders it joac/- Jier; but produces only one authority for this sense, and that neither from the New Testament nor the LXX. but from Appian. Macknight, I think, is more satisfac- tory, who translates ru ^iaS-E/xsva of the appointed, and sup- plies either the word hvixaclos, sacrifice, or t^ua, animal, which might be a goat, bull, or calf. He observes that lia.'biixBva is the participle of the second aorist of the middle voice of the verb Sia7<.%/u,», I appoint; and therefore its primary and literal signification is, of the appointed, a sense which our translators have given it, Luke xxii. 29. " And 1 Qia.ri.'buj.oci) appoint unto you a kingdom, as my " Father (JiartS^sTo) hath appointed unto me." It may be objected, that there was not (avayxTj) a necessity that all covenants should be ratified by the death of sacrifice; whereas the death of the testator was always held neces- sary to ratify his testament. In answer to this it may be (>l)served, that it was usual among the ancients, both Jews and Gentiles, to ratify solemn covenants or engagements CHAP. IX.] 'THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 4t by the death of sacrifice, which it is likely originated in divine appointment ; and we are sure that it was necessary that the two covenants, of which alone the apostle is speak- ing-, should be so ratified. If the intelligent reader is not satisfied with the sense I have given of this and the suc- ceeding verse in the paraphrase, he may, after considering what has been said, perhaps prefer the folio wing- transla- tion, " for where a covenant is, there is a necessity that the " death (r» ^la.^E/xsvs) of the appointed sacrifice ((pegjo-9-aj) *' be brought in," or produced. The next verse gives the reason of this necessity, namely, to make the covenant firm or give it validity. Ver. 17. For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no streni^th at all zchilst the testator lic- cth.'] So our translators have rendered this verse, agree- ably to their translation of licc^nxn and ^/a^e/asvoy in the for- mer ; but besides that these two words will bear another sense, as has been shewn, the original has not been very strictly followed in other parts of this verse. They have rendered etti vax^oir after men are dead. Wesley renders it, after he is dead, though vax^ojy is plural ; but in his note he says, " Neither this, nor after men are dead, is " a literal translation of the words;" and concludes, "it •' is a very perplexed passage." But siri m^hqois may be li- terally rendered upon, or over dead, viz. sacrifices, which supplement is expressed, Psal. 1.5. "those who have made " a covenant with me (ettj ^vaias) over sacrifices." The verse therefore may be thus translated, " For a covenant is " firm over dead sacrifices, otherwise it never hath force " whilst the appointed sacrifice liveth.'^ This sense of the verse is strongly supported by its close connection with the following verses, where he shews that it was by the blood of sacrifice that the first covenant was made or dedicated. Ver. 18. Whereupon neither the first testament was dedicated without blood.'] Literally, '' Hence neither *' the first without blood was dedicated." Though the 42 A COMMENTARY ON ' [CHAP. IX. substantive is here omitted, as it is in chap, viii.7, 13, ix. 1. yet it is evident from the following" two verses, that by thejirst is meant the transaction at Sinai, and that the sup- plement ought to be covenant^ as our translators have uniformly termed it throughout the Old Testament ; yet here, and in the context, they have called the same thing a testament, though there was nothing of the nature of a testament in all that transaction : And as to the manner of its ratification, was it ever known to be the practice of any people, in confirming a testament or last will, to slay the testator and sprinkle his blood on the legatees, as was done with the blood of sacrifice in that transaction ? The word Eyx.sx.aivi'^M, which denotes something made new, or newly made, our translators, according to the Vul- gate, have rendered was dedicated. In the margin they have it purified, and in chap. x. 20. consecrated. Perhaps none of these senses are altogether alien from the apostle's design ; for when God entered into covenant with a sinful people, it was necessary that they should be purified from guilt, reconciled to him, and dedicated or consecrated to his service as a holy and peculiar people ; and all this by means of atoning blood, without which there can be no friendly relation or correspondence between God and them : But as the apostle is here speaking of the covenant itself, and as this verse contains the proof of what he had said in the foregoing* respecting its being made (CeCjav) firm, or of force by death, I apprehend that by eyxsxajvjs-ax he means was ratified or confirmed, as the Syriac renders it. The manner of making and ratifying that covenant he describes as follows : Ver. 19. For zohen Moses had spoken every precept to all the people according to the law, he took the blood of calves and of goats, zeith water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, and sprinkled both the book and all the people.'] — The apostle here refers to Exod. xxiv. 3, 7, 8. where Moses gives an account of what took place on that solemn occasion : He first of all recited to the people all the words CHAP. IX.] • THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 43 of the Lord, and all the judgments, which are recorded in the four foregoing chapters ; and when the people agreed to them, and promised obedience, ver. 3. he wTote all the words of the Lord in a book, rose up early in the morning, buildefl an altar under the hill, and erected twelve pillars according to the twelve tribes of Lsrael, ver. 4. Then he sent young men of the children of Israel, who offered burnt-offerings and sacrificed peace-offerings of oxen unto the Lord, ver. 5. Half of the blood he put into basons, and the other half he sprinkled on the altar, ver. 6. He then took the book of the covenant, in which he had written all the words of the Lord, and read it in the audience of the people, to which they again gave their consent and promised obedience, ver. 7. Upon this agreement he proceeds immediately to dedicate or ratify the covenant between the Lord and the people, by sprinkling the blood of the slain sacrifices, ver. 8. This concluding action was what the apostle had chiefly in view as the proof of what he had said, ver. 18. and therefore he mentions only one of the preceding parti- culars, namely, that it was performed, '' when Moses had " spoken every precept to all the people, according to the law," (see Exod. xxiv. 3, 7.) that is, after he had pro- posed the terms of God's covenant to them, and ob- tained their consent, " he took the blood of calves, and " of goats, with water, and scarlet wool, and hyssop, " and sprinkled both the book and all the people." The apostle here does not strictly follow either the Hebrew or the LXX. for he mentions some things which are not expressed in the Mosaic account, though they appear to be be implied in it. In Exod. xxiv. 8. it is only said, that " Moses took the blood, and sprinkled " it on the people ;" but here we are told that it was the blood of calves and of goats loith water, and that the instrument used in sprinkling it was scarlet wool and 44 A COMMENTARY ON [cHAP. IX. hyssop, none of whicli things are, on this occasion, ex- pressly mentioned by Moses. To solve this difficulty, some have thought that the apostle does not here confine himself to what was done on that particular occasion ; but takes in various things which suited his purpose from other parts of the law relative to the sprinkling of the blood of sacrifices on other occasions. But though it is true that he immedi- ately after speaks of the universal use of sacrificial blood under the law for purification and remission (ver. 21,22.) yet it is by way of addition to what he here says of the dedication of the covenant. The Mosaic account suffi- ciently proves what the apostle had asserted, viz. that the first covenant was not dedicated without blood, ver. 18. but as to the kind of animals slain, and the manner of sprinkling their blood, these things do not seem so abso- lutely necessary to his purpose as to require his mention- ing them, had he not been fully assured that they were actually used in that solemn transaction. Others suppose, that the apostle might learn these particulars, as well as some other things he mentions, from the received tradi- tions and interpretations of the Jews. But it is not likely that our apostle would incorporate any thing into the very text of the Mosaic law, upon the bare authority of a Jew- ish tradition or interpretation. The apostle had sufficient authority for all the particu- lars which he here mentions, both from what is expressly said in the passage to which he refers, and from the pre- scriptions of the law itself as to the manner of performing- similar rituals. It is expressly said, Exod. xxiv. 5. that " they offered burnt-offerings, and sacrificed peace-offer- •' inffs of oxen unto the Lord." For oxen the LXX. have /xo(Txa§ja, calves, which sense the Hebrew word will also bear. (See note on ver. 12, 13.) As to goats, they were frequently used in the sin-offerings and annual atonements, Lev. xvi. 15, 27. and it has been observed, that wherever CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 45 burnt-offerings and peace-ofFerings are mentioned toge- ther, as being" offered for the people as here, goats or kids were always a part of the burnt offering-. Water was one of the prescribed means of purification even by itself, and when mixed with the blood, kept it in a fluid state fit for sprinkling. The scarlet wool and hyssop were used as the instrument of sprinkling-, Exod. xii. 22. Lev. xiv. 51, 52.; and though on some occasions the priest sprinkled it with his finger ; yet when such a large quantity of blood Mas used, and so many were to be sprinkled with it as on this occasion, the wool and hyssop formed a convenient instrument for that purpose. The apostle does not mention the sprinkling of the altar, Exod. xxiv. 6. but he mentions the sprinkling- of the book, which, I think, must be the book that Moses wrote and read in the audience of the people, ver. 4, 7. and which it is likely was laid on the altar and sprinkled with it. In the fore-cited passage we are simply told, that " Moses took the blood and sprinkled it on the people," ver. 8.; but our apostle says, he sprinkled it on (7rav7a) all the people. This I think is more likely than that he should have sprinkled it only on the twelve pillars, or on the seventy elders, or on those of the people who hap- pened to be nearest him, as some conceive, for as the covenant was made with all the people, so all of them must have been intended in that sprinkling. Peirce ob- serves on this verse, that " 'Tis not likely when God was " so punctual in his prescriptions of the old ceremonial " service, that he would fail to give Moses a particular " direction in so necessary a case, or that Moses would '* venture to act without it. And if this be allowed, " what can we look upon as a more reasonable supposi- " tion, than that God now prescribed to Moses the same " method which he did afterwards expressly in like " cases." To which we may add, that as the inspiration of the apostle must be admitted, there can no doubt but that all the particulars mentioned by him were pre- 46 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. scribed by God, and punctually observed on that re- markable occasion, though some of them are not ex- pressly mentioned in the Mosaic account. While 31oses was thus sprinkling the book, and all the people with the blood of the slain animals, he explained the meaning and design of that action in the following- words : Ver. 20. Saying, This is the blood of the testament (co- venant) which God hath enjoined unto you."] In the He- brew it is, " Behold the blood of the covenant which " Jehovah hath struck (or cut) with you concerning all these words:" namely, the words which he had written in the book of the covenant, and had read in their audience, and to which they had given their consent, ver. 7. Our apostle does not strictly follow either the Hebrew or the LXX. but the difference is only verbal, not in the sense. Some explain the apostle's words, "This is the blood of the covenant which God hath en- *' joined you to obey." Others, '' This is the blood " whereby the covenant which God commanded me to " make with you is ratified ;" But the words, " enjoined *' unto you," evidently respect the people, between whom and God, Moses acted as Mediator on that occa- sion. The sprinkling of the blood of the slain sacrifices on the book and on the people, was that by which the covenant between God and them, which was Avritten in the book and agreed to, was solemnly ratified and con- firmed. It deserves particular notice, that the words of Moses in sprinkling the blood are alluded to by our Lord, when he instituted the sacred Supper to keep up the memory of his death as a sacrifice ; for in delivering the cup he says, " This is my blood of the new covenant, >vhich is " shed for many for the remission of sins," Mat. xxvi. 28. see also 1 Cor. xi. 25. which shews that the new covenant was ratified by his blood, even as the first covenant was by the blood of the legal sacrifices. But herein lies the CHAP. IX.1 THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 47 difference ; the blood of those sacrifices ratified only a temporal covenant; but the blood of Christ is, "the " blood of the everlasting- covenant," Heb. xiii. 20. The former could not really take away sin, chap. x. 4. but Christ's blood was shed " for the remission of sins," and it is on that account that the promise of the new covenant is accomplished, " Their sins and their iniquities will I " remember no more," ver. 17. And alluding to the same thing, the blood of Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant is termed " the blood of sprinkling," chap. xii. 24. The apostle having shewn that the Sinaitic covenant was at first made and ratified with the blood of slain sacrifices, he proceeds to mention other instances, both stated and occasional, in which the sprinkling of blood was used for purification and atonement. Ver. 21. Moreover, he sprinkled likewise with blood both the tabernacle, and all the vessels of the ministry. '\ As the covenant itself was dedicated and ratified with blood ; so the tabernacle and all the implements and means of solemn worship and correspondence with God were in like manner sprinkled and purified with the same. The tabernacle was not erected, nor its utensils made till some time after the covenant was ratified ; and some think that the sprinkling here referred to was at the first erection and consecration of the tabernacle and its vessels ; for though, in the order given for consecrating them, nothing is mentioned but the anointing- oil, Exod. xl. 9, 10. yet we find that the altar at its consecration was sanctified with blood. Lev. viii. 15. so that it is likely the rest of the utensils were purified in like manner. JosEPHUS, who was himself a priest, says, " The taber- '* nacle and the vessels thereto belonging-, were con- '* secrated both with oil, and with the blood of bulls and " of rams." Antiq. Lib. iii. c. 8. But we are under no necessity to understand the apos- tle here as referring to the sprinkling of the tabernacle 48 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. and its vessels at their first dedication, as this was a. service which the hig-h-priest had statedly to perform every year on the day of expiation, Lev. xvi. 16 — 20. and it appears from what follows to the end of the chapter, that the apostle's chief design was to run the comparison between the services of the high-priest in the sanctuary on that day, and the exercise of Christ's priestly office in heaven. And though Moses did riot personally sprinkle the blood on the tabernacle and its vessels on the anniversary day of atonement ; yet it may be spoken of as his doing, because the high-priest acted in it ac- cording to divine appointment in the law delivered by Moses; for Moses often signifies his law, see Luke xvi. 29, 3L xxiv. 27. Acts xv. 21. 2 Cor. iii. 15. So that the apostle having shewn, that the covenant was at first dedicated or ratified with blood, he here goes on to shew the continued use of blood for purification and atone- ment throughout the Avhole administration of it, and in all the people's worship and intercourse with God. Ver. 22. And almost all things are by the laic purged with bloody and without shedding of blood there is no re- mission."] The apostle says, almost all things, intimating that there were a few exceptions ; for some things were purified with fire, others with water, and others with water mixed Avith the ashes of the red heifer, Num. xxxi. 23, xix. 2 — 10. But the things that were more pecu- liarly appropriated to the worship of God were all puri- fied with blood according to the law. Cleansing with blood was used on various occasions; but it was on the tenth day of the seventli month that an universal national cleansing was made, both of the people and of the tabernacle and its vessels. With respect to the people it is said, " on that day '* shall the priest make an atonement for you, to cleanse " you, that ye may be clean from all your sins before the " Lord," Lev. xvi. 30. Noav, though these yearly atone- ments by the blood of bulls and of goats, could not CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 49 cleanse the conscience or put away sin, ver. 9. cli. x. 4. ; thoug-h they had no intrinsic worth or efficacy in them to procure real pardon of moral guilt, or to free from the punishment of the life to come ; yet, by divine appoint- ment, they sanctified to the purifying of the flesh or body from ceremonial defilements which precluded them from the tabernacle worship, and freed them from the temporal civil penalties which they had incurred by transgressing- the laws of the state, and which God, as their political Sovereign, would have inflicted on them, unless these atonements had been made for them year by year con- tinually, chap. X. 1. As for the tabernacle and its vessels, including the most holy place where the divine presence resided, these were also purified with the blood of sacrifices, for so the law expressly required, "He shall make an atonement " for the holy place, because of the uncleanness of the " children of Israel, and because of their transgressions " in all their sins ; and so shall he do for the tabernacle " of the congregation that remaineth among them in the *' midst of their uncleanness," Lev. xvi. 16. This was performed in the following manner : The high-priest car- ried the blood of the appointed sacrifices within the vail into the most holy place, and sprinkled it with his finger seven times on the mercy-seat, and seven times before it ; and in like manner he sprinkled the outer apartment, or tabernacle of the congregation, and the altar, Lev. xvi. 14, 20. As these things were incapable of moral pollu- tion, their uncleanness must have been of a ceremonial kind, contracted as is expressed, " by their remaining '' among the people in the midst of their uncleanness ;" so that it was derived from the people, and the services performed in them by the priests on their account during the preceding year. By the cleansing and reconciling of these things, they were fitted anew to be used in the worship of God, and the tabernacles were opened to the prayers and other acts of religious worship to be per- VOL. II. E 50 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. formed by the priests and people during- the year follow- ing*. Now, as the people and the holy places were all cleansed from time to time with blood ; and as without shedding- of blood, there was not even a temporal re- mission granted by the law, nor access to God in his wor- ship ; this was well calculated to give the Israelites a deep impression of the holiness of God, of his irrecon- cileable opposition to sin, and of the claims of his justice upon the sinner ; while at the same time it had a shadow of good things to come, by admitting the death of a substitute for the guilty, and so prefiguring the sacrifice of Christ, which at once and for ever was to take away the sins of the true Israel, to procure for them access to and acceptance with God in their services here, and to open heaven for their reception hereafter. Ver. 23. It was therefore necessary that the patterns of things m the heavens should he purified with these; — ] The tabernacle with its apartments and utensils, are called the (vTcol&iyyi.xlot^ '' patterns of things in the heavens ;" that is, the representations or resemblances of them; for they were not the original patterns according- to which the heavenly things were made ; on the contrary, Moses was admonished of God to make all things according- to the heavenly pattern which was shewn to him in the mount ; so they were but copies and shadows of heavenly things, chap. viii. 5. The apostle infers that it was necessary that these things should be purified with the blood of the legal sacrifices. This necessity, I apprehend, must be owing to the ap- pointment of God, both as to their first consecration to a holy use, and to the continuance of that use by a yearly renewed purification, without which they would become unfit to answer the design of their appointment as resem- blances of things in the heavens. It was therefore necessary that the typical representations of things in the heavens should be purified with these sacrifices ; — hut the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices CHAP. IX.3 THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 51 than theseJ^ Various explanations are given of " the hea- *' venly things themselves." Wesley says, " they signify " our heaven-born spirits : what more they may mean we " know not yet." Several ancient commentators explain them of the church under the gospel. Others, that they might be sure not to miss the mark, include in them, " all *' the effects of the counsel of God in Christ, in the re- " demption, worship, glory, and eternal salvation of the " church : Christ himself, in all his offices ; all the spiri- " tual benefits and eternal effects of his redemption on the " souls of men, with all the worship of God in him in the *' gospel." But it is evident that (a.vla. ra sTragavja) " the *' heavenly things themselves," are the things which were represented by the Mosaic tabernacle and what per- tained to it : For that tabernacle which had the emblems of the divine presence, and all the vessels of the ministry in it, and in which the priestly services were performed, is termed, " the example and shadow of heavenly things," chap. viii. 5. — '' the patterns of things in the heavens," chap. ix. 23. — '* the holy places made Avith hands, which *' are the figures of the true," ver. 24. therefore '' the " heavenly things themselves," which answer to these figures and shadows as their truth and substance, must be the heavenly " holy places and true tabernacle" of which Christ is the minister, and " which the Lord pitched, and *' not man," chap. viii. 2. This is that " greater and more " perfect tabernacle, not made with hands," like the for- mer, chap. ix. 11. It is the true holy place, into which Christ hath entered as High-priest, now to appear in the presence of God for us, and is expressly declared to be (aJlov Tov agavov) heaven itself, ver. 24. But it may be asked. What need had the heavenly things or holy places themselves of being purified, since they never had any impurity in their nature, nor were defiled by other things, as no unclean thing can enter there ? In answer to this let it be considered, — 1st. That though the typical representations of heavenly things had no moral E 2 52 A COMMENTARY ON [CIIAP. IX. inipiirify in themselves, and tliongli neither person nor thing- ceremonially unclean was permitted to enter into the outer, far less into the inner tabernacle, to defile it ; yet we have seen that it was riecessary that they should be purified with blood on account of" the uncleanness of the people, and that they might thus be opened and fitted for their admission to and acceptance with God and his wor- ship. Now, as to the heavenly things, it may be observed, that though Christ himself had no sin of his own, yet, as the substitute of sinners, he sanctified and devoted himself to be a sacrifice for their sins, John xvii. 19. and by the blood of his sacrifice he was fitted as their High-priest to enter with his oblation into the holiest of all, being thus made perfect or consecrated through his sufferings, and furnished with something to offer there on their account, Heb.ii. 10. v. 8,9. vii. 28. viii. 3. — 2d. By his entering into heaven with the blood of his own sacrifice he hath (ev£Haivj(7£v) dedicated and opened for all believers a new- made and living way of access into the holiest, by which they may draw near in their spiritual worship with bold- ness, and the full assured faith of acceptance through his mediation, having* their hearts sprinkled from an evil con- science by his blood, Eph. iii. 12. Heb. iv. 16. x. 10 — 23. — 3d. Lastly, he hath gone into heaven (sroj/xatraj) to pre- pare a place for the everlasting- habitation of the saints, and will come again to receive them to himself, that where he is there they may be also, John xiv. 2, 3. So that the purification of the heavenly things was necessary on ac- count of the uncleanness of the people, and signifies to fit, prepare, and render them accessible to them in their worship, and in all their intercourse with a holy God. This was done by better sacrifices than those appointed by the law, whose eflicacy did not extend to heavenly things. By better sacrifices, the apostle intends the sacri- fice of Christ, which was but one, and only once offered, as he clearly shews, ver. 25, 2G, 27. x. 12, 14, 18. but here he uses the plural, to give dignity to it, as effectually CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 53 answering all the substantial ends of sacrifice, in procur- ing the everlasting pardon of sin, access to the throne of grace while here, and to the enjoyment of eternal life hereafter ; and which all the sacrifices of the law could not procure, however numerous and often repeated. But this better sacrifice was not presented and offered in the earthly tabernacle ; Ver. 24. For Christ is not entered into the holy places made with hands, which are the figures of the true ; but in- to heaven itself, noic to appear in the presence of God for us:2 It was the distinguished honour of the high-priest under the law, and that in which his peculiar ministry chiefly consisted, to enter yearly with the blood of atone- ment into the holy places of the tabernacle or temple, and particularly into the most holy places, where the divine throne and presence resided, Avliich notwithstanding were but holy places made with hands, or of human workman- ship, and only figures of the true or heavenly holy places, and of their services. The word rendered figures is avlilvTia, antitypes, a Avord which we commonly apply to the things which the figures signified ; but here it means the very opposite, namely, the figures or types themselves, and which he had just before termed to. vTro^aiyi^xlx, the ex- amples, or resemblances of things in the heavens, ver. 23. Now Christ, as our great High-priest, hath not entered with his oblation into the holy places made with hands, which were only typical resemblances of the true holy places ; " but into heaven itself," that is, into the highest heavens, the place of the peculiar residence of the Divine Majesty ; and so he is said to have " passed through the " heavens," chap. iv. 14. and to have " ascended up far *' above all heavens," Eph, iv. 10. The typical sacrifices on the day of expiation were slain without, at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, Lev. xvi. 7. but the offering and sprinkling of their blood was performed by the high-priesl, when he entered with it within the vail, which was properly making the atonement, and applying 54 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. it to tlie actual purification of the patterns of heavenly thinos : So Christ's sacrifice was slain and his blood shed on earth when he expired on the cross, bearing our sins in his own body on the tree. But, in order to compleat the atonement, it was necessary that he should, as High- priest, enter within the vail into heaven itself, with the blood of his sacrifice, to present and offer it there as an expiation before the throne of the Divine Majesty ; and there he now continues to appear in the immediate pre- sence of God, making- intercession with him for us on the ground of his meritorious and efficacious oblation. Ver. 25. Nor yet that he should offer himself often, as the h/.ffh-priest entereth into the holy place every year icith the blood of others /] The sense of this verse, and its connection with the preceding, seem to stand thus, " Christ has not entered into the holy places made M'ith " hands — ouh, neither has he entered into heaven itself " that he might offer himself often there, as the legal high- *' priest entereth into the holy places of the tabernacle " every year, with other blood than his own, namely, that " of slain animals." Here there is a striking contrast stated between the mi- nistry of the Aaronical high-priests in the typical holy places, and that of Christ our great High-priest in heaven. They entered into the holy places made with hands, but he into heaven itself. They entered into the former with the blood of slain animals, but he into the latter with his own blood. They had to withdraw immediately after they had accomplished the service of atonement ; but he continues there now to appear in the presence of God for us. They had to repeat this service yearly ; but Christ having made a complete expiation of sin by his one offering, and ob- tained eternal redemption for us, has left no room for any farther offering for sin. Christ had therefore no occasion to enter frequently into the heavenly sanctuary, as he abides there continually ; nor to offer himself often there, as the Jewish high-priest entereth yearly into the holy CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 55 places of the earthly tabernacle, to offer there the blood of bulls and of goats. Ver. 26. (For then must he often have suffered since the foundation of theicorld;) — ] As the blood which he offered in heaven was his own blood, which Avas shed when he suffered and died on the cross, and as his death was es- sential to his offering-, and necessary to his having some- thing to offer there, chap. viii. 3. so, upon supposition that it had been necessary that he should have offered himself often, or yearly, he must in that case have often suffered death since the foundation of the world : That is, since ever sin entered into the world, which was very soon after the world was created. In this limited sense the phrase is used in Luke xi. 50. But in opposition to his often suffering and offering himself since the foundation of the world, the apostle says, — hut now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin hy the sacrifice of himself] The words are not avvlsXEia. m aicovos in the singular, which frequently signify the end of the world, or the time of Christ's second coming, as in Mat. xiii. 39, 40, 49. xxviii. 20. but they are au-JlsXsix. twv cauvcuv, in the plural, and refer to a very different period, namely, the time of Christ's first coming, as the words following evidently declare. From the time that sin entered into the world, and expiation by sacri- fice became necessary, several ages had elapsed before Christ came the first time, such as the antediluvian, the patriarchal, and the age of the law, now near its close, and which was the fulness of the time appointed for his first coming-, Mark i. 15. Gal. iv. 4. The words therefore should be rendered, in the end, or at the conclusion or completion of the ages; and so they are to be understood in 1 Cor. x. 11. The end for which he then appeared, or was ma- nifested, was " to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself." That is, to make a complete and effectual atonement for sin at once, by his own sacrifice, and so, a^^rnaiv, to abo- lish all farther offering for sin. 56 A COMRIENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. Macknight justly observes here, that this reasoning- of the apostle " siipposeth two facts whicli are of great im- " portance. The first is, that from the fall of Adam to the " end of the world, no man will be pardoned but through " Christ's having offered himself to God a sacrifice for sin. " The apostle's reasoning- evidently implies this. For if •' sinners may be pardoned without Christ's offering him- " self a sacrifice, his offering himself so much as once " would not have been necessary, and far less his offering " himself often, as the apostle aflirms, — The second fact " implied in the apostle's reasoning is. That although " Christ offered himself only once, and that at the conclu- *' sion of the Mosaic dispensation, that one offering is in *' itself so meritorious, and of such eflicacy in procuring- " pardon for the penitent, that its influence reacheth back- " Avards to the beginning of the world, and forwards to " the end of time." The apostle insists much upon Christ's having offered himself but once or once for all, in order to set forth the infinite worth and efficacy of his sacrifice, as having fully satisfied Divine justice, and procured eternal redemption for us ; consequently rendered all farther offering- for sin entirely useless. This is what he has chiefly in view in the two succeeding verses, and also in the first part of the following chapter. Ver. 27. And as it is appoijited unto men once to die, hut after this the judgment /] He does not say, appointed to all men without exception once to die ; because Enoch and Elijah were translated to heaven in their bodies with- out dying, and those who are alive and remain on the earth at the second coming of Christ shall not die but be changed, 1 Cor. xv. 51. 1 Thess. iv. 15, 17. But the apostle here speaks according to the ordinary and general course of things. The appointment of men once to die is the sentence of God pronounced upon Adam's first trans- gression, viz. " Dust thou art, and unto dust sliait tliou " return," Gen. iii. 19. This sentence affects all his poi- CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 57 terity, For " by one man sin entered into the world, and " death by sin ; and so death passed through him unto *' all men, in whom all have sinned," Rom. v. 12. Death here, strictly speaking", is not spiritual death in trespasses and sins ; for it is the death which God appointed and inflicted on mankind as the punishment of Adam's one offence : Nor is it the second death ; for that is the punish- ment of men's personal deeds done in the body, and suc- ceeds the judgment : Rev. xx. 14. xxi. 8. whereas this is a dying but once, the judgment is after it. It must there- fore be that death which is so clearly expressed in the sentence, viz. man's returning to the dust from whence he was taken. But this death does not put an end to men's existence; for as surely as they die once, so surely shall the judgment take place after this. They shall all be raised from the dead, and " appear before the judgment-seat of Christ, " that every one may receive the things done in his body, *^ according to that he hath done, whether it he good or "evil." John v. 28,29. 1 Cor. v. 10.; for then they shall all receive their final sentence of everlasting hap- piness or misery. Matt. xxv. 31 — 46. Now as it is appointed unto men first to die once, and their bodies to return to dust ; Ver, 28, So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many : — ] The comparison here is between men's dying once, and Christ's being once ofl'ered, as opposed to the repetition of the legal sacrifices. All mankind became mortal, and were appointed to die once, not for their own personal sins, but on account of the one offence of the first man, their common father and representative : For " by " one man's disobedience many were made sinners," hav- ing the guilt of his sin so imputed to them, as to fall under the sentence of death denounced upon it, Rom. v. 18, 19. " So Christ was once offered," not for any sin of his own, for he knew no sin, but as the substitute of sinners, '' to " bear the sins of jnany." To bear sin is to suffer the . 58 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. IX. punishment of it, Ezek. xviii. 1.9, 20. In this sense Christ Mas made sin for ns, and suffered the just for the unjust : The Lord having- hiid on him the iniquities of us all, he was wounded for our transgressions, bruised for our ini- quities ; he poured out his soul unto death, and thus " bare " the sin of many," Isa. liii. 5, 6, 11, 12. or, as Peter ex- presses it, " who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree," 1 Pet. ii. 24. Now his being once offered to bear the sins of many, has not only procured for them a restoration from the first death which comes by Adam's one offence, and the pardon of their own many offences^ by which they had become liable to the pains of the second death ; but has also procured for them a title to reign in eternal life, Rom. v. 16, 17. And so he adds, — and unto them that look for him shall he appear the second time without sin unto salvation.'] The apostle men- tions two personal appearances of Christ. The first was when he appeared once in the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of liimself, ver. 26. It was then he assumed the form of a servant, was made in the likeness of man, and found in fashion as a man ; a man in a low and afflicted condition, a man of sorrows and acquainted with grief: This was the humble appearance he made, and which was answerable to the giacious errand on which he came. But when he comes the second time, O how dif- ferent will his appearance then be ! He will then appear without sin, that is, he does not come to suffer and die a second time as a sacrifice for sin, nor yet to enter again as High-priest into the heavenly holy place to present his oblation afresh : But he wiH then appear visibly in his glory coming from heaven, and all the holy angels in his train, and shall sit on the throne of his glory, in all the power, splendour, and majesty of the Judge of quick and dead of all ages and nations, who shall be gathered before him to receive their final sentence, Matt. xxv. 31, 32. Rev. xx. 11, 12, 13. This will be a terrible appearance to the CHAP. IX.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 59 wicked, (for every eye shall see him, Rev. i. 7.) ; but a most joyful appearance unto them that look for him, or, aTiByi^BxoiJ^svois, that expect or wait for him ; that is, to his faithful servants, who believe the promise of his coming-, and are described as waiting for God's Son from heaven, and as earnestly desiring and loving his appearing, 1 Thess. i. 10. 2 Tim. iv. 8. Tit. ii. 13. and so are diligent that they may be found of him in peace, without spot and blameless, 2 Pet. iii. 14. Therefore as Christ appeared the first time to make an atonement for their sins by the sacrifice of him- self; so he will appear the second time " unto their salva- " tion," or to confer upon them that complete and eternal salvation, which he procured, prepared, and secured for them by his first coming and succeeding mediation. Some are of opinion, that the return of Christ from hea- ven to earth at the last day, is here compared to, and was typified by the return of the high-priest from the inward tabernacle : For after appearing there in the presence of God, and making an atonement for the people in the plain dress of an ordinary priest. Lev. xvi. 23, 24. he came out arrayed in his magnificent robes, to bless the people who waited for him in the court of the tabernacle of the con- gregation : and it is thought that no image, for expressino- the grand idea which the apostle intended to convey, could be presented more suitably than this would be to a Jew, who well knew the solemnity to which it referred. But it is not clear that the apostle intends any such com- parison. He had said in the preceding verse, that after death is the judgment ; and we know that the judgment will take place at Christ's second appearance, when he shall punish his enemies, and bestow complete and eternal salvation on them that wait for him: but 1 do not find any thing answerable to this at the high-priest's return from the inward tabernacle ; and as to his blessing the people, this is what Christ has been engaged in ever since the commencement of his mediation, Acts iii. 26; Heb. vii. 25. though they are still waiting for the redemption of CO A COMMENTARY ON fCHAP. IX. ( / - their bodies, and the completion of tlieir happiness, when, he appears again, Rom. viii. 23. Col. iii. 3, 4. Besides, when the Jewish high-priest returned from the inward tabernacle, after having- made an atonement there, he made a second atonement in his pontifical robes, for himself and for the people, Lev. xvi. 24. which is directly con- trary to all that the apostle says of Christ's offering him- self only once ; and of his appearing the second time without sin, that is, without offering himself again as a /sacrifice for sin. 61 C H A P. X. CONTENTS AND SCOPE. The apostle in the foregoing discourse having" shewn, that the tabernacle, priesthood, divine ser- vices, and temporal blessings of the Sinaitic cove- nant, were only worldly emblematical representa- tions of the spiritual and heavenly things of the gospel economy, he, in the beginning of this tenth chapter, as a necessary consequence of all this, infers. That as the legal dispensation, and particu- larly its sacrifices, had only a shadow of good things to come, and not the very image or real substance of them, can never with these sacrifices which the high-priests offer continually every year, make the worshippers, for whom they are offered, perfect with respect to pardon and purification of conscience, ver. 1. This conclusion he farther establishes by the following arguments ; — 1st. That if these sa- crifices could have perfected the worshippers, they would have ceased to be offered ; because, upon sup- position that the worshippers were once perfectly cleansed from guilt, their consciences would be no longer disquieted with sin, as if any more or far- ther sacrifice were necessary to expiate it ; whereas, in the repetition of these sacrifices, there is a re- membrance of sins made yearly, ver. 2, 3. — 2d, That, in the nature of things, it is simply impos- C2 A C03IMENTARY ON [cilAP. X. sible that the blood of brute animals, such as bulls and goats, should take away the sins of rational creatures, ver. 4. — 3d, That as the legal sacrifices were ineffectual for this purpose, so they were to be set aside by the one sacrifice of Christ. This he proves from Psal. xl. 6 — 9. which represents Messiah, on his coming into the world, as address- ing God thus, " Sacrifice and ofiering thou would- " est not, but a body hast thou prepared me ; in " burnt offierings and sacrifices for sin thou hast *' had no pleasure : Then, said I, Lo I come (in " the volume of the book it is written of me) to ** do thy will, O God." On this remarkable pas- sage, he observes. That Christ, by declaring that all the sacrifices, which were offered according to the law, were insufficient to please God, and then by undertaking to come himself and do his will in this respect, he sets aside the former institution respecting the legal sacrifices, that he may establish the second, namely, the will of God respecting his own sacrifice ; and that by this will of God we are sanctified through the ofiering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all, ver. 8, 9, 10. — That every or- dinary priest standeth daily ministring, and ofier- ing often the same sacrifices, which shews that they can never take away sins ; but Christ having offer- ed one sacrifice for sins, instead of repeating it, he for ever sat down at the right hand of God ; thenceforth waiting till his enemies be made his footstool, as was promised him, (Psal. xc. 1.) For CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 63 by one offering he hath perfected for ever the sanc- tified, or procured everlasting" pardon and accept- ance for them, ver. 11, 12, 13, 14. 4th, He proves this everlasting remission of sins from tlie testimony of the Holy Spirit in the promise of the new covenant, where, among other things, God promises, " And their sins and their iniquities " will I remember no more," ver. 15, 16, 17. From which he concludes, that where God forgives sins, so as never to remember them any more, there can be no farther need of any more offering for sin, ver 18. The apostle having finished the doctrinal part of this epistle, and his admirable reasonings respect- ing the divine dignity of the person of Christ, with the superior excellence and efficacy of his priest- hood and sacrifice, to the typical priesthood and sacrifices of the Mosaic institution, he proceeds, in this and the following chapters, to the practical improvement of the whole, which he here intro- duces by way of inference, from the foregoing dis- course. From the consideration that we now have free- dom of access into the holiest by the blood of Jesus, by a way new made and living, which he hath dedicated and opened for us through the vail, that is, his flesh, and that we have a great priest over the house of God, he exhorts the Hebrews to approach unto God in his worship with a true heart, having hearts sprinkled from an evil 64 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. conscience, and the body washed in pure water, ver. 19, 20, 21, 22. He also exhorts them to hold fast the confession of tjie hope of salvation throug-h him without wavering- ; for he is faithful that promised, ver. 23. — And as the means of sted- fastness and perseverance in the faith, to consider one another in order to provoke to love and to> g-ood works ; and not to forsake the assembling- of themselves together for mutual edification, as some of them had already done, but, on the contrary, to be exhorting" and encouraging- one another to stedfastness, and so much the more as they saw the day of God's vengeance upon the unbelieving- Jew- ish nation drawing nigh, ver. 24, 25. — He sets be- fore them the aggravated guilt, and dreadful but certain punishment of apostates from the faith, ver. 26 — 31. — And, on the other hand, to fortify their minds against the fear of their persecutors, he reminds them of the inward support which they had experienced under their sufferings for the name of Christ after they were enlightened ; with what courage and constancy they then endured them t, the kind part they took with their suffering bre- thren ; the compassion which they shewed towards himself while a prisoner, and the joyful manner in which tliey took the spoiling of their goods, from tlie assured hope which they had of a better and an enduring substance in heaven, ver. 32, 33, 34. He exhorts them therefore not to be discouraged, or to cast away their boldness of faith and hope. CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. (j5 which, if continued in, will have a great reward, ver. 35. — That in their present suffering state, they had indeed need of patience, that, having done the will of God by enduring to the end, they might receive the accomplishment of the promise, ver. 36. — Farther, to encourage them in patient perseverance, he intimates, that their present troubles would not be of long continuance ; for that Christ would soon interpose for their relief; and to this he applies what is said of Habakkuk's vision, chap. ii. 3. '* For yet a little while, and he " who is coming, will come, and will not tarry." And, to shew that their only safety lay in holding fast the faitli, he cites ver. 4. ** Now the just by " faith shall live ; but if he draw back," God says, *' my soul shall have no pleasure in him," ver. 37, 38. — Then he concludes with expressing his per- suasion that the Hebrev/s were not of the number of those who draw back unto perdition, but of such as would continue to believe unto the salva- tion of the soul, ver. 39. PARAPHRASE. Chap. X. 1. Wherefore the 3Iosaic law having onl(/ a shadow of the good things to come, and not the very image, at' substance^ of these things, can never with the same sacrifices which they offer each year, make those who come to them for ever perfect in respect of pardon. 2. Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be Vol. II. F G6 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. offered ? The?/ certainly would ; because the wor- shippers having been once purified y/'or/i^mV^ woukl have had no more conscience of sins, so as to need any more sacrifice for them. 3. But in these sacrifices a remembrance of sins is made every year. 4. For it is impossible in the nature of things, that the l^lood of bulls and of goats should take away sin. 5. Wherefore, coming into the world he (Mes- siah) saith, (Psal. xl. 6, 7, 8.) " Sacrifice and ^' offering thou wouldest not ; but a body thou " hast prepared for me ; G. " Whole burnt offerings and sacrifices for sin, " thou art not well-pleased with them : 7. " Then I said, Behold I come (in the volume " of the book it is written concerning me) to do, " God, thy will." 8. Having said above, That sacrifice and offer- ings, and whole burnt offerings, and sacrifices for sin (which are offered according to the law) thou wiliest not, neither art well-pleased with them ; 9. Then he said, '* Behold I come to do, " God, thy will." Hereby he taketh away the first kind of appointed sacrifices, their continuance beiiuj no lomjcr the will of God, that he may esta- blish the second, namely, the sacrifice of himself, which 7vas to do God's will. 10. By which will of God we are sanctified, or effectually cleafisedfrom the guilt of sin, through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once. CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 67 11. And indeed, not only did the high-jniest of- fer once every year, hut every ordinary priest, in his couj'se, standeth daily ministering and offering often the same sacrifices, which shews that these never can take away sins : 12. But he (Christ) having offered only one sa- crifice for sins for ever sat down at the right hand of God, vested with royal dignity and universal power as a kingly priest on his throne ; 13. Thenceforth waiting till his enemies be made his footstool, as was promised to him, Psal. ex. 1. 14. For by one offering of himself he hath per- fected for ever them that are sanctified by it. 15. This the Holy Spirit also testifieth to us in the jwomise of making a new covenant, Jer. xxxi. 34. for after having before said, 16. " This is the covenant that I will make " with them after these days, saith the Lord, I '* will give my laws into their hearts, and upon " their minds will I write them," he adds, 17. " And their sins and their iniquities, I will " remember no more." 18. Now, where remission of these is, no more offering for sin is required. 19. Having therefore, brethren, freedom of ad- mission into the entrance of the lioliet.; l^y the blood of Jesus ; 20. Which entrance he hath dedicated for us ; a way newly made and living, into the heavenly f2 68 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. sanctuary^ throug'h the vail, that is, through the vail of his flesh : 21. And having a great Priest over the house of God, who presents our worship to his Father and makes intercession for us, 22. Let us approach to God through him with a true heart, in full assurance of faith in his effi- cacious fnediation, our hearts being sprinkled from an evil conscience, and our bodies washed in clean water. 23. Let us hold fast the confession of the hope without wavering; for faithful is he who hath promised. 24. And, to promote our stedfast perseverance in the faith, let us attentively consider one another for the mutual excitement of love and good works. 25. Not deserting the assembling together of ourselves, as is the custom of some ; but exhort- ing one another ; and so much the more as ye see the day of God's vengeaiice, foretold by Christ, (Mat. xxiv.) drawing nigh. 26. For if we sin wilfully by apostacy, after having received the knowledge of the truth, no more sacrifice for sins remaineth, 27. But some dreadful expectation of judg- ment, and fiery indignation, which shall devour the adve^iaries. 28. Any one who set at nought the law of Mo- ses, died without mercy on the testimony of two or three witnesses. CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 69 29. Of how much sorer punishment, think ye, shall he be counted worthy, who hath trampled on the Son of God as an impostor, and reckoned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanc- tified, a common thing-, and hath insulted a7id blasphemed the Spirit of grace ? 30. For we know him who hath said, (Deut. xxxii. 35.) " Vengeance helonfjeth unto me, I will " repay, saith the Lord." And again, (ver. 36.) " The Lord will judge his people." 31. It is a terrible thing to fall into the hands of the living God, when taking vengeance on the despisers of his Son and Spirit. 32. But, to renew gour courage and steadfastness, call to remembrance the former days, in which being hut latelg enlightened, ye courageoiislg en- dured a great conflict of sufferings -, 33. Partly indeed, in being made a public spectacle both by reproaches and afflictions ] and partly, in being companions of them who were thus treated. 34. For ye also suffered with me in my bonds, and took with joy the spoiling of your woildlg substance, knowing in yourselves that ye have in the heavens a better substance, and lasting". 35. Wherefore, cast not away your boldness in the faith, which, if maintained to the end, hath a great recompence of reward in heaven. 36. For ye have need of patience wider jiresent sufferings, that, having done the will of God by 70 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. enduring to the end, ye may receive the accom- plishment of the promise. 37. For yet a very little while, and he who is coming will come, and will not delay. So that your present sufferings will not be long. 38. Now the just by faith shall live; but if he draw back through unbelief, " My soul," saith God " will not be well pleased with him." See Hab. ii. 3, 4. 39. But we are not of them who draw back unto destruction ; but of a persevering faith to the obtaining the salvation of the soul. COMMENTARY AND NOTES ON CHAP. X. Ver. 1. Wherefore the laic — ] As this verse is not a proof of the doctrine contained in the foregoing- chapter, hut an inference from it, the introductory particle yaq should not be rendered for, but zcherefore. By the law we must understand the law of Moses, and particularly all its institutions respecting the priesthood, and the service of the tabernacle by sacrifices and other ordi- nances of divine worship. This law — having a shadow of good thitrgs to come, and not the very irnage of the things, — 3 Some imagine, that here there is an allusion to painting ; axia, shadoio, denotes the rude draught or outlines of a picture, and that au%v rnv Eixoya, the very image, signifies the picture when finished, and exhibiting the exact likeness of the original. But I do not think the apostle alludes to painting at all, but to the shadow of a body as distin- CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 71 guished from the body itself". Thus, speaking of the ceremonial services, he says, " which are a shadow of " things to come; but the body is Christ's:" Col. ii. 17. Here the shadow is opposed to the body itself, of which it has but an obscure resemblance; and such was the priesthood, sacrifices, and services of the tabernacle: They were " not the very image of the things ;" or, as the Syriac version has it, *' not the substance of the " things themselves ;" in which sense Chrysostom and Theophylact also interpret the words. The " good " things to come" were Christ's sacrifice, priesthood, and ministry in heaven, with all the benefits of his mediation. Now the law having but a shadow of these good things, — can never zoitJi those sacrifices which they offered year by year continually, make the comers thereunto perfect.'] Some refer si-r to ^iwzk^s^ continually , not to the offering of the sacrifices, as our translation does, but to the per- fecting of the comers thereunto ; and according to this the sense will be, That the sacrifices of the law, being- only a shadow of the true sacrifice, can by no means perfect for ever the comers to them. This seems to be the true sense ; for it agrees exactly with the scope of the apostle's argument, and particularly with what he says, ver. 14. The sacrifices which are here particularly mentioned are those which were ofi'ered year by year, tliat is, on the tenth day of the seventh month, which was the great day of yearly expiation of the sins of the whole nation, on which the high-priest alone entered into the holy of holies with the blood of the sacrifices, and there presented and sprinkled it on and before the mercy- seat, Lev. xvi. Now if those sacrifices, offered by the high-priest on the most solemn occasion and nearest approach to the Divine presence, could not perfect for ever those for whom they were offered, much less could the daily sacrifices oflered by tiie ordinary priests do it. The (hi ■sjqosaq-xpij.avoi) comers to, are the same with (Jji 72 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. Kalqsuovisi) the worshippers, in ver. 2. and is a term fre- quently used in tliis epistle in that sense, as in chap, vii. 25. X. 22. xi. 6. and they are so called from their approaching to God, or to his altar, with their oblations, which could not for ever perfect them. The word rs- Xeicoaai, when used in a sacrificial sense as here, signifies sometimes to consecrate, but most commonly to cleanse from the guilt of sin ; and so it is explained in the next verse by the worshippers being once purged, that is, com- pletely and for ever pardoned. The legal sacrifices could not procure this ; Ver. 2. For then loould they not have ceased to be of- fered ? — ] The Syriac and Vulgate want the negative particle «x, not, and read it, " then would they have " ceased." Other copies have not, but read the clause interrogatively. The sense, however, is the same, viz. that if the legal sacrifices had procured a perfect and everlasting remission of sins, there would have been no occasion to repeat them yearly ; they must, in that case, have ceased to be offered any more; and the reason given is, — for the worshippers once purged, should have had no more conscience of sinsJ^ Some may perhaps think, that as men are contracting new sins, the repetition of a per- fect sacrifice might be necessary to expiate them. But this could not be necessary in respect of God, if one sacrifice had made full satisfaction, so as to be of per- petual eflicacy. — Nor would such a repetition be neces- sary in respect of the conscience, if that one sacrifice once ofi^ered were believed to be sufficient to obtain continued pardon. When the apostle, upon the supposition that the wor- shippers are once purged, says, that they " should have " had no more conscience of sins," he surely does not mean, that they would have no longer any consciousness of sinning ; " for if we say that we have no sin, we " deceive ourselves,"- 1 John i. 8. Nor does he mean CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 73 that they would be insensible to the evil and demerit of their sins ; for that is the state of a stiipified or seared conscience, 1 Tim. iv. 2. Neither does he mean that they Avould find no more occasion for repentance, con- fession of sin, or frequent application to the throne of grace for mercy through that perfect sacrifice which once relieved their consciences ; for that would contradict all the directions and exhortations oiven to believers under the gospel dispensation concerning these things. See Mat.vi.l2. Heb.iv.lG. lJohni.8,9. Rev.ii.5. iii. 18, 19. But from the nature of the apostle's argument, his mean- ing appears to be this, That had the sacrifices of the law procured a real and everlasting remission of sins, and the worshippers believed they had such eflicacy, they would have had no more uneasiness of conscience on ac- count of the sins for which the atonement was made, as* if that were not sufficient, or as if a farther atonement were necessary to dischage them from the guilt of sin before God ; but might have rested fully assured that God required no farther satisfaction for sin, nor any more offering for that purpose ; consequently the repetition of the sacrifices must have ceased. Ver. 3. But in those sacrifices there is a remembrance again made of sins every year.'] So far were the legal sacrifices from procuring real pardon, and satisfying the conscience of the worshippers that their sins were to be remembered no more, that in these very sacrifices which were offered on the great day of expiation, there was a remembrance again made of sins every year ; which proves that they did not obtain real remission of sins in the new covenant sense by these sacrifices, otherwise they would not have been thus remembered again: Be- sides, this remembrance of sins did not merely respect the sins they had committed during the preceding year, or since the last annual atonement; but all their former sins in general, as the confession then made seems to import, Lev. xvi. 21, 22. 74 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. It has been a query with some, whether the remem- brance of sins here respects God's remembering- them, or the Morshippers' remembering- them in the way of con- fession and acknowledgment. That the Israelites were to remember their sins, and confess them on the day of the annual atonement, is clear from Lev. xvi. 21, 31. Nay, believers under the g-ospel must still remember their sins, confess them and pray for the pardon of them ; not indeed on the ground of a repeated sacrifice of atonement, as under the law ; but solely on the ground of the perfect atonement which Christ hath made by offering- himself once, and that a fresh appli- cation of its cleansing virtue may be made to their con- sciences. But by a remembrance of sins I think we are chiefly to understand God's remembering- them, as manifested in his instituting- the repetition of legal sacri- fices; which shewed these were insufficient to procure pardon for the worshippers, and so their sins were still remembered or marked against them. To this the pro- mise of the new covenant is opposed, viz. " I will forgive " their iniquity, and remember their sins no more," Jer. xxxi. 34. and which our apostle informs us is grounded on Christ's one sacrifice, by which he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified. Heb. x.,14 — 19. God does not remember sins when he does not entail the curse on them, nor require any more sacrifice to expiate them. The apostle having- proved, from the repetition of the legal sacrifices on every yearly day of atonement, that they could not make any real expiation of moral guilt, or procure a full and final discljarge from its penalty, he proceeds farther to evince this froin the nature of the sacrifices themselves. Ver. 4. For it is 7iot possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take awny sins.l — Bulls or bullocks and goats were the sin-offerings on the yearly day of expiation, though rams were also appointed for burnt olFerings, Lev. xvi. 35. He mentions only the blood of bulls and goats ; CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 75 for as their blood Avas their life, and the shedding of it their death, so it was only the blood that was carried within the vail, and by which the atonement Avas effected ; and this is what the Lord himself declares, " The life of " the flesh is in the blood, and I have given it to you upon " the altar, to make an atonement for your souls ; for it is " the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul." Lev. xvii. IL But the main thing to be attended to here is, what the apostle denies to the blood of these animals, namely, that it is not possible that it should, aveigh more than that of the present Hebrew copies, I am inclined to think that the Hebrew in this place has been altered through the carelessness of transcribers, or perhaps through design to weaken the evidence it affords, that the sacrifice of CHAP. X.] THR RPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. §1 Christ's body once offered, has for ever abrogated the whole of the Mosaic sacrificature. The apostle goes on with the rest of the citation ; Ver. 6. '* In hurnt-offerings and sacrifices for sin thou " hast had no pleasure ."] In the first clause of the cita- tion, ver. 5. and in this, several expressions are used, which are not to be considered as synonimous or mere repeti- tions, but as referring- to the different kinds of sacrifice appointed by the law. The Israelites were commanded to offer sacrifices of certain beasts, of fowls, and of the fruits of the earth. The chief of these Avere, 1. Burnt-offerings, which the Hebrews term Gnolah, i. e. ascension, so called because their savour and virtue ascended up from the fire towards heaven. The LXX. term them oXoyiavlajixala, i. e. whole burnt-offerings ; for, excepting their blood, which was brought into the holy place for reconciliation, their bodies were entirely con- sumed in the fire, Lev. i. 16, 27. and of these the priests had no share but the skin. Bullocks and goats were thus offered on the annual day of atonement, but on other oc- casions other clean animals might be substituted. Under this head may be classed the continual burnt-offerings, and also all occasional burnt-offerings, together with their ap- pendages, the Mincha, or meat-offerings of flour, cakes, baked or fried, salt, oil, frankincense, &c. and the drink- offerings, or libations of wine poured out upon the sacri- fice. These not being zehole burnt-offerings, the Lord's part of them was burnt on the altar, and the remainder belonged to the officiating priests, who thus partook with the altar. 2. There were sin-offerings, which in Hebrew are term- ed Hattah, that is, sin : The LXX. also express the same thing by oc^j^xolioc, sin, and tts^i a/>i,a§7.ij, rendered volume, should be translated the head, top, or beginning; others, the chief article or suin of the book. It may be observed that books then were not bound like ours, but rolled up as it were like a large map, and so the word may signify a roll, as it is rendered in Ezra vi. 2. Ezek. ii. 9. iii. 1, 2, 3. Some are of opinion, that by the book is meant the book of eternity, as they speak ; o'hers, the book of the laic. My own opinion is, that by the book is meant not only the law, but also the prophets who G 2 S4 A COMMRNTARY ON [cHAP. X. testified before hand the suffering's of Christ, Acts iii. 18. 1 Pet. i. 11. that book which he himself explained to his disciples after his resurrection, and which contains all that is written in the law of Moses, and in the pro- phets, and in the Psalms concerning- him, and particu- larly concerning- his sufferings, Luke xxiv. 25, 26, 27, 44, 45, 46. And though Christ's words in Psal. xl. were written before the writings of the succeeding- prophets, yet, by a common prophetic anticipation, they are re- presented as spoken by him when coming into the world, long- after the scriptures of the Old Testament were completed. We may also observe, that the apostle, in his citations, does not always quote the Avhole passage, but sometimes such parts of it as are directly to his purpose : An in- stance of this we have in ver. 16, 17. of this chapter. So here, in citing Christ's words, " Lo, I come — to do *' thy will, O God," in the Psalm they are, " O my God," with this addition, "yea thy law is within my heart," or, *' in the midst of ray bowels," as the Hebrew has it. But from the whole we may learn, 1. That Christ came into the world in consequence of being sent of his Father, as he frequently declares. He came to do his Father's will, or to obey his command- ment, especially the commandment to lay down his life for the sheep, John x. 17, 18. xiv. 31. which is the point the apostle has particularly in view as opposed to the legal sacrifices. It was by the things which be sutfered as a sacrifice for sin, that he learned obedience even unto death ; and obedience necessarily supposes a pre- vious commandment. That he might be capable of this obedience, it was necessary that a body should be pre- pared or fitted for him; that is, a true and complete human nature, susceptible of all those sufferings of mind and body, in pouring out his soul unto death, which were necessary to expiate and take away the sins of the world. CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 85 2. From the words Me may also learn, how ready and willing- Christ was to do his Father's will, or obey his commandment in this matter. Though he had the clear- est view of the infinite evil and demerit of the sins of mankind, and had fully before him all that he was to suffer as their substitute; yet he cheerfully undertook that arduous Avork which the Father gave him to do, saying, " Lo, I come to do thy will, O my God." Had he been reluctant or averse to comply with the will of his Father, it would not have been proper and accept- able obedience; but having also in view the glorious effects which were to result from his obedience, his whole heart Mas engaged in it ; and so he adds, " yea, •' thy law is within my heart." And as he was voluntary in his undertaking, so was he in accomplishing it; for though he was, by wicked hands, to be taken, crucified, and slain, Acts ii. 23. yet in the foresight of this he says, " Therefore doth my Father love me, because I lay " down my life, that 1 might take it again. No man " taketh il from me, but I lay it down of myself: I have " power to lay it down, and I have power to take it " again. This commandment have I received of my «* Father," John x. 17, 18. The apostle now recapitulates the foregoing remark- able passage, and applies it directly to his purpose. Ver. 8. Above, zchen he said, Sacrifice and offering, and burnt-offerings, and offering for sin, thou zoouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein ; (which are offered by the law; J Ver. 9. Then said he, Lo, I come to do thy will, God. He taketh away the first, that he may establish the second,"] Two things are obvious from these words, — 1. That God had no pleasure in the legal sacrifices as a sufficient atonement for sin. This is plain from the first part of Christ's address to his Father, " sacrifice " and offerings, whole burnt-ofierings and offering for " sin, thou M'ouldest not, neither hadst pleasure therein ;" 86 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. and the apostle observes, that thLs is spoken of the sacri- fices « which are offered, xalx rov voixov, according to the ** law," consequently were originally of divine appoint- ment; which is all that the most zealous Hebrews could plead for their continuance ; yet as Christ, who perfectly knew his Father's mind, declares that he was not well- pleased with them, they must be disannulled to give place to a more acceptable and efficacious sacrifice. — 2. That the sacrifice of Christ has come in place of all the legal sacrifices. This appears from the succeeding part of Christ's words, "Then, said I, Lo, I come to do " thy will, O God." Christ in all things did the will of God ; but here the connection requires that it should be more particularly understood of God's will or command- ment to lay down his life as a sacrifice for the salvation of sinners, John x. 17, 18. xiv. 31. This was the leading design for which he came into the world. Mat. xx. 28. 1 Tim. i. 15. for which a body was prepared him, Heb. ii. 14, 15. and for which he took upon him the form of a servant, Phil. ii. 7, 8. This is that one obedience or righteousness by which many are made righteous or jus- tified, Isa. liii. 10, 11. Rom. v. 18,19. and is that obe- dience for Mhich his Father loved him, and hath most highly exalted and rewarded him, John x. 17. Phil. ii. 9, 10, II. On the whole of Christ's words in this cita- tion the apostle observes, that " he taketh away the first, " that he may establish the second :" That is, he abolishes the former institution of the legal sacrifices, that he may establish the latter will of God which he came to do by offering- the sacrifice of himself. Ver. 10. By the which will we are sanctified, through the ojferittg of the body of Jesus Christ once for a//.] Christ had said, " Lo, I come to do thy will, O God," and here the apostle, referring to that, says, " By the ' which will," that is, by the doing- which will of God, * we are sanctified." Sanctifying here, and indeed throughout the most of this epistle, does not directly CHAP.X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 87 signify the producing of inherent moral purity in the subjects of it; but is to be understood in a sacrificial sense, i. e. such cleansing or purifying as is effected by expiation or atonement ; and chiefly consists in the re- mission of sins, the purification of conscience from its guilt, and in being consecrated or separated to God and his service as his peculiar people. (See note on chap, ii. 14.) And this sense is clear from the means to which this sanctifying is ascribed, it being " through " the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once." For " Jesus, that he might sanctify the people with his own " blood, suffered without the gate," chap. xiii. 12. Christ's offering is here termed his body, plainly refer- ring to the citation ver. 5. where, according to the read- ing of the LXX. the Mords are, " a body hast thou " prepared me :" But it signifies a body animated by a human soul, and so capable of suffering-, or of being slain as a sacrifice ; and it has already been observed, that his whole human nature is intended by bis body. Thus, by the express testimony of the Jewish Scriptures, the apostle has proved, that as the legal sacrifices were at first established" by divine authority, so they are abolished by the same authority ; and that the sacrifice of Christ alone is that in which God rests satisfied, or is well pleased with as an atonement for the sins of men. From this to the 19th verse the apostle briefly sets forth the superior dignity, excellence and efficacy of Christ's priesthood and sacrifice to those under the law. Ver. 11. And every priest standeth daily ministring, and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices uliich can never take away sin:'] Some copies read every high- priest; but I prefer the common reading, which evi- dently includes the ordinary priests who ministered xa&* Tifjiiqacv, daily, while it does not exclude the peculiar ministry of the high-priest from time to time. See chap, vii. 27. The high-priest was indeed a more eminent type of Christ than the ordinary priests were ; but both 88 A COMMENTARY ON [cilAP. X. of them prefigured liim in his priesthood and ministry ; and so are both distinctly mentioned in that view, chap, ix. 6, 7. and may be understood as included here. Every Aaronical priest " standeth daily miuistring." They performed their ministry in the standing posture of humble worshippers, and were not permitted to sit down in the presence of God, as if their work had been conj- pleted. They were " daily ministring :" The ordinary priests in their turn were employed every day, morning and evening, in the service of the tabernacle: The high- priest was also engaged from time to time, and parti- cularly on the anniversary day of expiation. But there was no end of their work: They had continually to begin afresh as if nothing had yet been done ; and had still to go on with a continued repetition of their services day by day, and year by year continually. The work they were more especially engaged in was " offering ** sacrifices ;'' all of which laboured under the same essential defect; they " could not take away sins." They could not do it in the sight of God, by satisfying the demands of his justice; nor could they cleanse the conscience of the sinner so as to give him peace with God. Let them be offered ever so often, or with ever so much cost, solemnity and punctuality, they could (uhTsols) never, by any means, or at any time, really take away sins, or procure an everlasting pardon of them. Ver. 12. But this man, after he had offered one sacri- jice for sins, for ever sat down on the right hand of God.~\ Man is here a supplement, though not distinguished ~as such ; perhaps the designation priest or high-priest would have suited better in contrasting Christ with the legal priests. Both he and they offered sacrifice for sins; but their ministry differed essentially from his in various respects : They offered many sacrifices, and often-times the same ; but he offered but one sacrifice, and that only once : They offered the blood of others, such as of bulls and of goats ; but he offered himself, his own blood : CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 89 They stood daily ministring- and oftering those sacrifices, which, as they could never take away sins or please God, could not procure them rest in his presence, as if their atoning- service was ended ; whereas Christ, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins, for ever sat doion on the right-hand of God. His sittins' down on the right-hand of God, or, of the Majesty on high, is several times mentioned in this epistle. See chap. i. 3. viii. 1. xii. 2. And this is stated as the consequence of his one sacrifice, and as a proof that it is complete and final, so as to leave no room for any other expiatory sacrifice, nor for a repetition of his own, he being now seated at God's right-hand, never more to suflfer or die. It is also a conclusive proof that God is well-pleased and fully satisfied with this one offering, since, as the consequence and reward of it, he has ad- vanced him in human nature to the highest station of dignity and honour, next to himself; for the Father's inviting him to sit at his right-hand (Psal. ex. 1.) imports his conferring on him royal dignity, power and universal dominion as King and Lord of all ; and to this is added the promise of a complete and final conquest of all his enemies; " Sit thou at my right-hand until I make thine " enemies thy footstool :" So that " he must reign till he *' hath put all enemies under his feet: and the last ene- " my that shall be destroyed is death." 1 Cor. xv. 25, 26'. This excludes every idea of his coming to suffer again for sin. " He was once offered to bear the sins of many ; " and unto them that look for him shall he appear the " second time without sin," i. e. without a sin-offering, " unto salvation." Chap. ix. 28. Instead therefore of his coming to die a second time as a sacrifice, he is Ver. 13. From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool.'] From the time in which he sat down at God's right-hand as High-priest and King, his atonement was completed and for ever accepted ; and as to (to XoiTiov) the rest, or what remains of his work, he 90 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. is fhenceforfli expecting or waiting till (according to bis Father's promise, Psal. ex. 1.) his administration shall issue in the complete and final destruction of all his and his people's enemies : But as to any farther offering for sins, he hath entirely put an end to that, and to any farther need of it; Ver. 14. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.'^ The word rzkziua'xi, to make perfect, is used in different senses, and the kind of per- fection intended must be determined by the nature of the means by which it is effected, and also by the nature and condition of the person or thing to which it is ap- plied. Here the means is Christ's one offering, and as the leading design of that was to make atonement for sins, and procure such a remission of them as that God should remember them no more, as explained in the following verse ; so to perfect for ever in that sense, is to procure a complete and everlasting pardon of sins for them. Christ hath done all that Avas necessary to this by his one offering, which therefore is never to be repeated. The persons who are perfected by it are rss dyi(z<^o(/.£VHf, the sanctified ; that is, those to whom the benefit of his sacrifice is actually applied, and so have their hearts purified from an evil conscience, through faith in ^he suf- ficiency of the blood of Christ to cleanse them from all sin, and to obtain their acceptance to eternal life. Thus they " are sanctified through the offering of the body of " Jesus Christ once," ver. 10. So that both the words perfected and sanctified are to be taken in a sacrificial sense, and expressive of the effects of Christ's one offering-. Ver. 15. Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us; — ] In proof of what he had just now advanced, viz. that Christ by one offering hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified, he refers the Hebrews to the testimony of the Holy Spirit in Jer. xxxi. 34. as a full attestation to the truth of it. The testimony he has particularly in view is a promise of the new covenant of which Christ is CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 91 Mediator, and which he has procured and ratified with his blood, namely, the promise of the everlasting remis- sion of sins ; —for after he had said before,"] That is, after the Lord had previously mentioned some other promises, such as, Ver. 16. " This is the covenant that I will make with " them after those days, saith the Lord ; I will put my " lazes into their hearts, and in their minds will I write " them i\ He then adds, Ver. 17. *' And their sins and iniquities will I remem- ** ber no more"'] As ver. 16. seems to be merely an in- troduction to the 17th verse, on which the apostle's proof evidently rests, to mark this the more distinctly, I have prefixed the words he then adds, and am informed that there are some copies which have a reading equivalent to this ; but supposing it not to be genuine, and an addition to the original text, it is at least a necessary supplement, without which our author's sense would not be so obvious. Under the old covenant, and as an essential part of it, the Lord appointed the repetition of sacrifices, and parti- cularly of the yearly atonement, in which there was '* a " remembrance again made of sins every year," as being not really expiated by these, but still charged to account, ver. 3. and the reason given is this, " for it is not possible " that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away *' sins, ver. 4. But in the promise of the new covenant, which was to be made and established in Christ's blood, the Lord says, " their sins and iniquities will 1 remember " no more." From which the apostle draws this obvious conclusion. Ver. 18. Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.] Here the apostle explains " re- " membering sins no more," to be the remission of them ; and it is clear, that where God forgives iniquities, so as never to remember them any more, no farther atonement is either required or needful. Thus the Holy Spirit hath 92 A COMMENTARY OH [cHAP. X. testified, " that by one offering Christ has perfected for " ever the sanctified," ver. 14. See note on chap. viii. 12. From what the apostle has said of Christ's sacrifice, and confirmed by the testimony of the Holy Spirit, we may learn what to think of the doctrine of the Church of Rome, respecting- what they call the sacrifice of the mass, which was established by the council of Trent, and declared to be a '* true and proper propitiatory sacrifice for sin," (Sess. xxii. Can. 1. 3.) in offering- which the Roman priests are so incessantly employed, and in which the Papists are taught to trust for the pardon of their sins, in proportion to the number of masses, which either by favour, money, or legacies, they can procure to be said for them, after they are dead. This is evidently (as Macknight observes), a most impudent and pernicious error, as it proceeds on the supposition, that the offering of Christ's body once is not sufficient to procure the pardon of sin for ever, but must be frequently repeated ; consequently that the testi- mony of the Holy Spirit, and the apostle's conclusion from it, is false, viz. that " there is no more offering for sin.'* Should they reply, that their mass is only the repre- sentation and commemoration of the sacrifice of Christ, this would be to give up the cause ; for a representation and commemoration of a sacrifice, is not a sacrifice at all, far less a true and proper propitiatory sacrifice for sin, as they affirm. The apostle having- finished the doctrinal part of this epistle, he now proceeds to the practical improvement of it, in a variety of instructions, exhortations, and cautions, from this to the conclusion ; and he begins here with an exhortation, which he introduces byway of inference from the foregoing discourse, and the encouragements it affords in our approaching God. Ver. 19. Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of JesusJ] Upon the ground of the perfection and efficacy of the sacrifice and priest- CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 93 hood of Christ, believers have boldness. The word itappviaia. signifies properly /reedo^w of speech ; but by an easy figure, signifies boldness, or an holy filial confidence in approach- ing the Divine Presence; and it is opposed to the state of things under the law, particularly to the spirit of bondage and fear, which prevailed in Old Testament worshippers, and which was much influenced by the very institutions and manner of their worship. Believers have this freedom or boldness " to enter into " the holiest," literally, " in the entrance of the holies." By the holies is meant that which was typified by the holy of holies in the tabernacle and temple, and which is explained to be heaven itself, chap. ix. 24. This is the New Tes- tament seat of worship ; for there the glorious presence of God resides ; there the mercy-seat or throne of grace is placed, chap. iv. 16. and there Jesus our High-priest, the minister of the holies, and of the true tabernacle, appears in the presence of God for us, chap. viii. 2. ix. 24. So that there is no holy place nor seat of worship on earth as formerly : Yet it does not follow, that by " the entrance of the holies," the apostle directly means death, as the learned Ma CKNiGHT explains it; for though the spirits of just men do not personally enter into heaven till death, nor their bodies till the resurrection ; yet those who, in this life, worship God in spirit and in truth, have access to the throne of grace in heaven, and that with boldness and confidence through the faith of Christ, chap. iv. 16. Eph. ii. 18. iii. 12. This is what the apostle has here more immediately in view; and by which he encourages the Hebrews to the practical use of it in drawing near with a true heart, &c. ver. 22. Believers who have this access are greatly privileged above Old Testament worshippers : " The way into the holiest of all was not yet made mani- •' fest, while as the first tabernacle was yet standine-," chap. ix. 8. None but the high-priest alone had access into the typical holy of holies, and he only but once a-year. Neither the people nor the ordinary priests were permitted 94 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. to enter or worship there, nor so much as to look into it but at their peril, Lev.xvi. 1, 2, 17. The people were kept at a distance, standing- without during the time of the ser- vice, Luke i. 10. But now, in opposition to this, believers have boldness in the entrance of the holies by the blood of Jesus, Ver. 20. By a new and living zoay which he hath con- secrated for us through the vail, that is to say, his jiesh :] If this translation gives the sense, it is neither by follow- ing- the order, nor g-iving the etymological meaning of some original words. The w which begins this verse, seems to refer to tw ejdo^ov in the foregoing, and signifies which entrance : Evsjcamaev sig-nifies he hath new made; but as this word is used, Heb. ix. 18. to express the solemn ratification of the Sinaitic covenant by the blood of sacri- fice, it may here be rendered dedicated or consecrated. Two things are affirmed of the way which is thus dedicated for us, viz. that it is 97§o(Ti^aTov xaj ^wo-av, newly slain and living : To attribute these things to a way seems both un- suitable and inconsistent ; but when we recollect that Christ says, " I am the way, and the truth, and the life : no ** man cometh unto the Father, but by me," John xiv. 6. we may easily see how these things apply to him, seeing he also declares, " I am the living one, and was dead ; " and behold I am alive for evermore. Amen ; and have the " keys of hell and of death," Rev. i. 18. He is the Lamb that was slain as a sacrifice for our sins, and now he ever liveth in heaven to make intercession for us, and so is the way of our present access to, and acceptance with God in our worship. Farther, as he is also possessed of the keys of hell and of death, being the resurrection and the life, and having power to raise us at last from the dead ; so he is the Avay of our personal entrance into heaven itself, that we may be ever with him. The apostle says, the way which Christ hath dedicated for us into the holies is through the vail, which he explains of. his Jlesh. The entrance into the holy of holies in the tabernacle and temple, was CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 95 through the vail or curtain which separated it from the holy place or court of the priests. What answers to that vail, we are told, is Christ's flesh, that is, his body, or human nature, in which he suffered as a sacrifice for us on the cross, and which instead of precluding the people's entrance into the presence of God as that did, has conse- crated and laid open a way of access into the holies, for all who draw near or come unto God through him, chap, vii. xix. 25. for he " hath once suffered for sin, the just " for the unjust, that he might bring us to God," I Pet. iii. 18. When Christ expired on the cross, the vail of the temple was miraculously rent in twain from the top to the bottom. Matt, xxvii. 51. and as this must have laid open the holy of holies, I apprehend that the apostle alludes to this circumstance when he calls Christ's flesh the vail. Ver. 21. And having an High-priest over the house of God y] In the original he is here styled Uqbx ixsyav, a Great Priest : Great in dignity, honour, and authority : Such a Great Priest as has been before described at large, every part of whose character and qualifications makes him highly worthy of our most unlimited trust and confi- dence in all our concerns with God. He is a Great Priest, ETTt, over the house of God ; not a servant like Moses, but a Son over his house, chap. iii. 5, 6. that is, over the uni- versal church, the whole family of God in heaven and earth, Eph. iii. 15. being the head over all things to the church which is his body, Eph. ii. 22, 23. Col. i. 18. and having full power effectually to manage and transact all its affairs ; and as he is always living to make interces- sion for us, he is able to save to the uttermost, them that come imto God by him, Heb. vii. 25. So that he is in all respects such an High-priest as became us, being fully suited to our need, ver. 26. all which affords the highest encouragement in our approaches and applications to God through him. The apostle having briefly mentioned the privileges of 96 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. believers under the gospel, proceeds to inculcate the practical improvement of them. Ver. 22. Let us draw near — ] q. d. Since every obstruc- tion is now removed, and the way of access to God is laid open by the sacrifice and mediation of Christ, let us drazo ?iear, Uqo(Teqx,°(jiM, signifies to approach or coyne to God in his worship and service. Hence worshippers are termed comers, Heb. x. 1. comers unto God, chap. vii. 25. chap. xi. 6. The exhortation to draw near or come to God imports the whole of our intercourse with God in all the exercises of religious worship, whether public or pri- vate. The manner in which we are to draw near or ap- proach unto God in his worship is — with a true heart, — ] That is, with a sincere, honest, and upright heart, or, as our Lord expresses it, we " must " worship the Father in spirit and in truth," John iv. 23, 24. This is opposed to hypocrisy, whereby men draw near with their mouth, and with their lips do donour God, while they have removed their hearts far from him, Isa. xxix. 13 ; and it is also opposed to the letter or outward typical worship of the law, and is the spirit and truth of it. We are to draw near — in full assurance of faith, — ] This 7r>.io§o(po§ja, or full assurance of faith is not, as many conceive, an absolute certainty of a man's own particular salvation ; for that is termed the full assurance of hope, ch. vi. 11. and arises from faith and its fruits : but the full assurance of faith is the assurance of that truth which is testified and pro- posed in the gospel to all the hearers of it in common, to be believed by them unto their salvation, and is also termed the full assurance of understanding, Col. ii. 2. Though all that the gospel reveals, claims the full assurance of faith as being divine infallible truth ; yet assurance being here connected with the foregoing discourse as its improve- ment, it seems more particularly to respect the assurance of fciith in theefticacyand all-sutficiency of Christ's priest- hood and one offering, for procuring pardon, access t» CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 97 God, and acceptance with him in his worship here, con- sequently an entrance into his immediate presence here- after. Farther, we are to draw near — having our hearts sprinkled from an evil conscience, — ] This alludes to the sprinklings under the law whereby the Israelites were cleansed from ceremonial defilements, and so fitted to approach to God in his worship, Num. xix. But instead of these legal sprinklings, which could not make the worshippers perfect as pertaining to the con- science, Heb. ix. 9. but only sanctified to the purifying of the flesh or body, ver. 13. we are to draw near having* sprinkled hearts from an evil conscience, that is, from the Accusations and terrors of a guilty conscience, and that through faith in the blood of Christ, which pacifies the conscience and cleanseth it from dead works to serve the living God with freedom and acceptance, ver. 14. To these particulars the apostle adds, — and our bodies washed with pure waterJ] This may al- lude to the divers washings or immersions under the law, chap. ix. 10. and by which both the priests and people were purified for approaching to God in worship. Lev. xvi. 4. Num. viii. 7. Lev. xiv. 8. xv. 5 — 12. xvii. 15, 16. But as it cannot be supposed that the apostle is exhorting Christians to continue the use of these legal washings, it is thought that by having the body washed he means the cleansing of the outward conversation from the deeds of the body or filthiness of the flesh, Rom. viii. 13. 2 Cor. vii. 1. and by pure water the purifying influence of the Holy Spirit, which is compared to pure or clean water, Ezek. xxxvi. 25. Such purification is without doubt es- sentially necessary to our worshipping God acceptably. But there are many learned and judicious commentators who understand both the body and the z^ater literally, and explain these words of Christian baptism. That this is what is meant appears very probable ; for there is no other washing of the body appointed under the gospel but in baptism : And it is most natural to understand both body Vol. II. H 98 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. and water here in a literal sense ; for if having the body washed tvith pure water were to he understood entirely of something' spiritual and internal, it would be hard to dis- tinguish it from the sprinkling of the heart from an evil conscience, mentioned immediately before, which seems to be the spiritual signification of baptism. So also, I ap- prehend, we must distinguish being horn of water from being horn of the Spirit, John iii. 5. and the washing, or laver, of regeneration from the renewing of the Holy Spirit, Tit. iii. 5. the former being the outward sign, and the latter the spiritual signification of baptism. Peirce, Avho seems positive that baptism is here intended, says, " Our translators were doubtless in the wrong- in joining' " this clause to the end of ver. 22. which most of the " printed Greek testaments I have seen make the begin- " ning of ver, 23. They, who, following the pointing of *' our translation, understand our author as saying, ' Let " our actions be washed and pure also,' will not easily " produce any place of scripture wherein to aw/xa, the body " is put for the actions, — But nothing can be more exact " than this expression when understood of baptism, which " is literally a washing of the body, and is also called the " washing of regeneration." Sec also Whituy, Mack- night, and many others. If this clause ought to begin ver. 23. it will stand in close connection with the follow- ing words, thus. And the body being washed with pure water, — Ver. 23. Let us holdfast the profession of our faith without wavering, — ] The original words are v.d[\i.yj»nuzv T7)v o/w,oXo7jav tfis sXiri^or, " let us hold fast the confession " of the hope ;" but our translators, on the authority of one MSS. only, have substituted faith for hope. The dif- ference, however, is not very material, since it is in believ- ing that men are filled with joy and peace, and abound in hope, Rom. xv. 13. faith being " the confidence of things hoped for," Heb. xi. 1. according to Christ's commission to hisapostles, Mat. xxviii. 1.0,20. Mark xvi. 15, U). baptism CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 99 was at first administered to none but those who were pre- viously instructed in the doctrine of the gospel, and who manifested their belief of it by a personal confession of their faith in Christ, and of their hope of salvation through him ; and so they received baptism as the sign of the re- mission of their sins. Acts ii. 38, 41. xxii. 16, and of tlieir communion with and conformity to Christ in his death, burial, and resurrection; and by it they were solemnly engag-ed thencefoi'tli to walk in newness of life, Rom. vi. 3_15. Col. ii. 11—14. Gal. iii. 27. Nothing therefore could bo more pertinent than to urge the Hebrews to hold fast their failh and hope in Christ, which they openly and boldly professed in the face of danger at their bap- tism ; and that they should persevere in this " without " wavering," or being- moved either by the threats of their persecutors, or the sophistical reasonings of false teach- ers. To encourage them, and indeed all Christians, in holding fast the confession of the hope, he uses this ar- gument, — for he is faithful that promised :] He had insisted much on the promise of God made to Abraham, which was confirmed with an oath, that we might have strong consolation who have fled to lay hold on the hope set be- fore us, Heb. vi. 13 — 19. This promise has been already accomplished so far as relates to the coming of the Seed, Christ, and is accomplishing in blessing the nations in him, who is the procurer and pledge of all the promises which are yet to be accomplished, and all are yea and amen in him ; and particularly the promise of the heavenly country, the rest which remains to the people of God, which is the ultimate object of the Christian hope. Now as God has promised to assist believers in every duty, to support them under every trial, to give them the victory over their ene- mies, and a glorious reward at last, which shall put an end to all their present toils, and crown their labours with eternal happiness; so the consideration that he is faithful who hath promised, is on(^ of the sirongest encotiragements h2 JOO A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. to hold fast the confession of the hope without wavering'. As the means of mutually confirming- each other in the hope of the gospel, and of promoting- the proper fruits of it among- them, he gives them the following important exhortation, Ver. 24. And let us consider one another, to provoke unto love and to good works .•] The word }i(zlacvoaj(ji.£Vy sig- nifies, " let us attentively consider ;" for xa7a increases the force of the word with which it is compounded. We are not merely to be concerned about ourselves as de- tached individuals, but, as members of one body interested in each other. We are attentively to consider one ano- ther's wants, infirmities, temptations, and dangers, and to administer suitable assistance, advice, admonition, caution, consolation, or encouragement, as the respective case of each may require. By such means we are mutually '• to '^ provoke to love" that is, to stir up and excite each other to that peculiar love which Christ has enjoined upon his disciples in his new commandment, enforced by the exam- ple of his love to them, and by which all men were to distinguish them as his disciples, John xiii. S4, 35. We are also to provoke each other to good zoorks, by which in Scripture are generally meant kind and beneficial works, including particularly the work and labour of love to Christ's name in ministring to the saints, Heb. vi. 10. Rom. xi. 13. These are substantial fruits of true faith and genuine Christian love, and without which faith is dead, and love is only in word and in tongue, James ii. 14, 18. 1 John iii. 17, 18. To provoke one another to love and to good works from proper principles, gospel motives must be used, which will have a direct tendency to strengthen and con- firm each other in faith and hope. Again, whatever pro- vokes to mutual love and its fruits, as it attaches Chris- tians to each other, and strengthens their union, so it for- tifies them against the attempts of the common enemy, and makes them stand '* fast in one spirit, with one mind. CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 101 " striving together for the faith of the gospel, in nothing " terrified by their adversaries." Phii. i. 27, 28. Farther, the exercise of brotherly love, and of the good works of it, having the promise of the heavenly reward, produces solid evidence in the conscience of believers that they are of the truth, and have passed from death unto life, 1 John iii. 14, 19. and so diligence in the work and labour of love is prescribed as the way of attaining to the full assurance of hope, Heb. vi. 11. But as real Christian love with its fruits cannot take place, nor the assurance of hope be obtained, without holding fast the truth of the gospel, which is the foundation of faith and hope, the apostle cautions the Hebrews against the neglect of the appointed means necessary to that end ; Ver. 25. Not forsaking the assembling of oursdves to- gether, as the manner of some is ; — ] The former direc- tion may relate to their christian intercourse one with another in general ; but this particularly and expressly respects their stated and public assembling of themselves for worship and mutual edification. It is by means of the public assemblies or churches of the saints, that the visible and scriptural profession of Christ's name is exhi- bited and kept up in the world, Rom. i. 8. 1 Thess. i. 7, 8. and they are compared to golden candlesticks, or lamps, as diffusing the light aroimd them, Rev. i. 20. It is in these assemblies that the various gifts and offices were ai first placed and exercised, i Cor. xii. 27 — 31. Gal. iv. 11, 12. and it is in them only that God's word and public or- dinances of social worship, can be statedly either ad- ministered or observed. The institution of churches, and the social ordinances delivered to them by Christ and his apostles, are in all respects most excellently calculated to promote the union and mutual love of Christians, and to edify and establish them in the faith and hope of the gospel ; and therefore the apostle exhorts the Hebrews, " not to forsake the assembling of themselves together, '^' as the maimer" or custom " of some e,y." It appears I0'2 A COMMKNTAKY ON [CHAP. X. Croiii this, that some of the Hebrews had so far given up with the open profession of Christ's name as to withdraw from the public assemblies of the church. Peirce is of opinion that the cause of this Avas their bigotted attach- ment to the ceremonial law, and their being disgust- ed at the reception of Gentile converts into their fellow- ship without conforming to it. In others it might be the fear of persecution from their unbelieving countrymen : But whatever were their reasons for this conduct, it ap- pears, from its awful tendency afterwards mentioned, that the apostle considered it as a symptom of begun apostacy, and therefore cautions the rest of them against leaving oft' the assembling of themselves together, which was to relinquish the public profession of Christianity, and the means of their nuitual edification and establish- ment. He also directs them how they were to be engaged in their public assemblies, in order to promote the ends of their union ; — hut exhorting one another; — ] To exhort zyaqaKaXsiv, is earnestly to call, persuade, and excite men to their duty, by setting the proper motives to it before them, some of which are suited to awaken cautious fear, and others to encourage hope and a(hninister comfort. Exhortation includes both, and so the same original word is sometimes rendered to exhort, 1 Thess. iv. 1. and at other times to comfort, ver. 18. Though exhortation is a branch of the work of pastors and teachers, and belongs to their office, Rom. xii. 9. 2 Tim. iv. 2. Tit. i. 9. yet not exclusively, but is the duty also of others, who have '• knowledge, and " are able also to admonish one another," Rom. xv. 14. The apostle is not here addressing pastors in particular, but all the brethren in general who may be in some mea- sure qualified to speak to edification, exhortation, and comfort. What he enjoins is a mutual duty, " exhorting " one another ;" and though one another is a supplement here, yet the connection and sense require that it should be supplied from the preceding verse. The duty pre- CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 103 scribed is also a public duty to be performed in their as- semblies ; " not forsaking the assembling of yourselves " together, but exhorting." From the connection too, it appears that the ends proposed for this mutual duty Avas to establish each other in the faith and hope of the gospel, and to provoke to love and to good works. The apostle had formerly given a similar exhortation to the Hebrews, and with the same view, chap. iii. 12, 13. "Take heed, " brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of " unbelief, in departing from the living God : But exhort " one another daily, while it is called to-day, lest any of " you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin." To stir them up to greater diligence in this, and every other appointed means of promoting- their establishment and perseverance in the faith, he adds, — and so much the more as ye see the day approachhig."] The day which is here more immediately referred to is the day of the Lord's coming to put an end to the Jewish church and state, and to punish that people for their infi- delity and rejection of the Messiah, and persecution of his followers. This day had been long and frequently fore- told. It is termed ". the great and terrible day of the " Lord," Joel ii. 1, 2, 31. Acts ii. li), 20. Our Saviour predicting this awfid event, says, " These be the days of *' vengeance, that all things which are written may be " fulfilled," Luke xxi. 22. As to the time, he informs his disciples, that the generation then living should not pass till all be fulfilled, ver. 32. He also sets before them the signs which were to precede that dreadful calamity, and by which they might see the day approaching, or drawing nigh, ver. 8 — 12. for by the time of writing this epistle it was but about eight or nine years from the destruction of Jerusalem and of the temple, which put an end to its services. He assures his followers that there shall not an hair of their head perish, ver. 18. But this safety they were to expect only by attending to his instructions and cautions against being deceived by false Christs and pro- 104 A COMMENTARY ON ||CHAP. X. pliets who were to arise, ver. 8. by avoiding- intemperance and the cares of this life, which might put them off their guard, ver. 34. and by persevering in the faith to the end. Matt, xxiv. 1 3. In this way they might be assured of escapinof, not only the punishment tJiat was coming on the Jewish nation, but the still more dreadful punishment in a future state, which awaits those who, having been once enlightened, apostatize from the Christian faith. Ver. '26. For if we sin wilfully, after that zne have receiv- ed the knowledge of the truth, — ] To sin zoilfully does not mean every sin which we commit with the consent of our will ; for it will he hard to mention any sin in which the will is not more or less concerned. We find in scripture many of the approved children of God falling into such sins as necessarily implied a consent of the will for the time ; yet they are not said to sin [bkhoius) wilfully. Paul was a blasphemer of Christ, and compelled others to blas- pheme him; he was a persecutor and injurious, breathing- out threatenings and slaughter against the disciples of the Lord, Acts ix. 1. xxvi. 10, 11. 1 Tim. i. 13. Yet it is not said that he did this wilfully, but ignorantly , in unbelief. Peter though he had much to learn, was a sincere lover of Christ, and resolved to die with him ; yet he denied him with imprecations and oaths, not wilfully, butthrough/eoir. Mat. xxvi. 74. The expression to sin wilfully seems to refer to Num. XV. 30, 31. where it is described as doing ow^hi presumptuously, or zoith an high hand, and as reproaching the Lord, and despising or contemning the word of the Lord: but the apostle shews that to sin wilfully against the gospel is a more heinous sin, and deserves sorer punishment than was inflicted on those who despised Moses' law, ver. 29. This sin cannot be committed till "after we have re- " ceived the knowledge of the truth ;" hence Paul could not commit is ignorantly in unbelief. The knowledge of the truth here is the same with being ojice enlightened, chap. vi.4. (See the notes there and on ver. 5.) Peter admits, that some, after they have known the way of righte- CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 105 ousness, and escaped the pollutions of tlie world, through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, may be again entangled therein and overcome ; turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them; and so like the dog- retiun to his vomit, and as the sow that was washed, to her wallowing in the mire, 2 Pet. ii. 19 — ^22. And our Lord in the parable of the sower shews, that men m-ay " receive the word loith joy, and for a while believe, who *' in time of temptation fall away," Luke viii. 13. These and such passages shew, that men may not only know the truth, but believe and have joy in it, and that it may have a considerable influence on their conduct for a time, and yet, after all, sin wilfully and fall away irrecoverably. For such, the apostle says, — there remaineth no more sacrijice for sins.'\ Some ex- plain these words and what follows as if the apostle had said, " As the legal sacriiices are now abolished, and the " temple wherein they were offered is about to be destroy- " ed, if we believers sin wilfully (and all sins are wilful) " after we have received the knowledge of the truth, we " have no occasion for any other sacrifice but what Christ " has already offered : But as to the unbelieving Jewish " nation, who have rejected that sacrifice, nothing remains " to them but a certain fearful looking for of judgment," &c. But as this gloss does not distinguish the wilful sin of apostacy from other sins, nor apostates from the un- believing Jews who never professed the faith of Christ ; and as it neither agrees with the words nor scope of the passage, it is needless to spend time in a formal refuta- tion of it. Mr. Peirce on this passage says, " An emphasis is de- *' servedly laid upon that word wilfully ; by which a wide *' difference is made between the case of those who are " borne down for a time, and forced contrary to their own " inclination, by the violence of their sufferings, to disown " the truth, and those who deliberately and wilfully apos- " tatize from Christianity. Of this latter only does he use lOG A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. " such sharp expressions in this place, with which we may •' compare chaj). vi. 4—6. 2 Pet. ii. 20, 21." And on the words there remaineth wo more sacrifice for sins, he says, " To comprehend the full strength of this argument, we " must remember what was before fully proved, that the " legal sacrifices upon which the Jews were so prone to " depend, could not possibly make an atonement for sin, " and consequently no reasonable hope could be left the " Jews by reason of them. There was no other sacrifice " that could avail for sins but the sacrifice of Christ ; and " therefore, if they had no part in that, there could remain " no other sacrifice for them. Now that such zcilful apos- " tales could have no part in the sacrifice of Christ, and " therefore must be left in the most deplorable and reme- " diless condition, is what he farther argues in the follow- " ing verses." Let it be observed, that the apostle is not here speaking of the unbelieving Jews who had never been enlightened so as to profess the faith of Christ ; but of those of them only who had received the knowledge of the truth and once professed to believe it ; who had seen the miraculous evidence by which it was at first confirmed as a revela- tion from God, and had themselves, some of them at least, been partakers of the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit, chap. vi. 4, 5. and yet, in the face of all that evidence, turned out wilful apostates, and determined enemies to Christ, his cause and people, and so rejected the only ef- fectual sacrifice which God had appointed and accepted ; now, for such as thus sin wilfully, we are told, " there re- " maineth no more sacrifice for sins." The only sacrifice remaining under the gospel is the sacrifice of Christ, and as they wilfully despise and renounce the benefit of that sacrifice, they have no sacrifice for sin whatever remain- ing to them ; consequently, must be destitute of every reasonable and revealed ground of hope, and nothing is left to them, Ver. 27. But a certain fearful looking for of judgment CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 107 and fiery indignation, ivhich shall devour the adcersaries.'] God's wrath against his adveisaiics is fiequeutly compared to fire on account of its irresistible, tormenting, and de- vouring- nature. Perhaps there is an allusion here to what Moses says, Deut. iv. 24. and to what the Lord himself threatens, chap, xxxii, 21, 22. Our apostle elsewhere re- presents Christ as punishing the wicked by fire at the last day, " when the Lord Jesus shall be revealed from heaven " with liis mighty angels, in fiaming fire, taking vengeance " on them that know not God, and that obey not the gos- " pel of our Lord Jesus Christ, who shall be punished " with everlasting destruction from the presence of the " Lord and from the glory of his power." 2 Thess. i. 7 — 9. This is the punishment which awaits wilful apostates from the gospel, and of which the most terrible apprehensions must ever haunt them while they allow themselves to think at all on their hopeless case. This judgment without mercy on wilful apostates, he illustrates by what took place under the law of Moses, w ith which the Hebrews were well acquainted. Ver. 28. He that despised Moses^ law died without mercy under two or three witnesses ;~\ The word rendered des- pised is a^ernffay, which signifies a putting away or dis- anmiUing ; and so the same word is translated, chap. vii. 8. ix. 2G. It is not every sin against the Mosaic law that is intended, nor even every capital crime which incurred death by that law, such as murder, adultery, incest. Sab- bath-breaking, &c. but it was sinning wilfully, that is, presumptuously, or with an high hand directly against God himself, reproaching or blaspheming tlie Lord, and despis- ing his word, Num. xv. 30, 31. Lev. xxiv. 14 — 17. and preferring the false gods of the heathen to him as the ob- jects of trust and religious worship, Deut. xiii. 6 — 12, xvii. 2, 3. notwithstanding all the manifestations he had made of himself as the only living- and true God. This was a total renunciation of their covenant relation and al- legiance to the God and King of Israel, who had redeem- 108 A COMMENTARY ON £cHAP. X. ed them from Egyptian bondage, and sanctified them to be a peculiar people to himself. Any who thus despised the law of Moses, " died without mercy under two or three '* witnesses :" No atonement was to be made for him, no mercy or pity was to be shewn him; but he was immedi- ately to be put to death on the evidence of two or three witnesses, and under their hands, which were to be first upon him, and afterwards the hands of all the people, Deut. xvii. 6, 7. Though this punishment was no greater than that which was inflicted on other capital oftenders, yet it was the utmost that could be inflicted by the hands of men, who can only kill the body. Some are of opinion, that by Moses' law the apostle only means the ceremonial part of it, and Mr. Peirce says, " Should the contrary be supposed, it will not be easy to '* understand how our author could argue (as he seems " evidently to do) from the less to the greater : for the " directly blaspheming the supreme God could not be a " smaller crime than the indignity here mentioned as of- " fered to the Son of God." But it appears to me that by Moses' law the apostle means the whole Mosaic institution taken complexly, without distinguishing it into moral and ceremonial. The main design of this epistle is to set forth the superior excellency of the gospel to the legal dispen- sation ; and his manner of reasoning here is the same as in chap. ii. 1 — 5. where he calls Moses' law the word spoken by angels, and urges their giving the more earnest lieed to the gospel from its being spoken by the Lord him- self. Now the word spoken by angels must certainly in- clude the whole of that law which was given from mount Sinai both moral and ceremonial ; for Stephen, speaking of Moses, says, " This is he that was in the church in the " wilderness, with the angel who spake to him in the " mount Sinai, and with our fathers ; who received the lively " oracles to give unto us." Acts vii. 38. And, blaming the Jews, he says, " Who have received the law by the ^' disposition of angels, and have not kept it," ver. 53. CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 109 Does he blame them merely for having transgressed the ceremonial part of it? Or did the lively oracles only con- sist of that ? Farther, Paul speaking of the law, says, " it " was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator." viz. Moses, Gal. iii. 19. and Moses' own account of the deli- very of the law clearly shews, that it was not only the cere- monial but moral law that was thus ordained in his hand. See Exod. xx. xxxi. 18. Deut. v. ix. 10. It should be observed, that the ten words proclaimed from the mount, Exod. xx. and afterwards written with the finger of God on two tables of stone, were the very words of the covenant which God made with Israel, chap, xxxiv. 28. and by that peculiar covenant they were bound to observe all the statutes and judgments, ceremonial and judicial, contained in that book of the law which Moses wrote, chap. xxiv. 4. xxxiv, 27. for these were the expli- cation at large of the ten precepts of the covenant, as ap- plied and adapted to the peculiar state of that people ; so that in breaking any of these they transgressed the law written on the tables. Therefore, when any sinned wil- fully or presumptuously against God, it made no diiference, either as to guilt or punishment, whether it was in the matter of a moral or positive precept ; he was to die with- out mercy. Now, if such was the punishment of him who despised Moses' law, which had but a shadow of good things to come, Ver. 29. Of how much sorer punishment suppose ye, shall he he thought ivorthy^ who hath trodden under foot the Son of God — ] Here the apostle appeals to their own judgment, whether he who sins wilfully against the grace of the gospel covenant, does not, from the higher degree of his guilt, deserve sorer punishment than he who pre- sumptuously despised Moses' law. To give them a deep impression of the more heinous nature of this sin, con- sequently of the justice of its being more severely pu- nished, he describes its nature and aggravation in the most striking terms. He had said in general that it was to 110 A COMMENTARY ON [cHAP. X. " sin wilfully after having received the knowledge of " the truth;" and indeed without this knowledge it can- not be committed at all ; but here he proceeds to shew- more directly the nature of it, and represents him who is guilty of it as " havings xxlocnoclriiyxs, trodden under foot " the Son of God." An expression which signifies to treat him with the greatest disdain and contempt, as men do with the most worthless and vilest of things, such as the filth or mire of the street on which they trample. See Isa. xxvi. G. Mic. vii. 10. Mai. iv. 3. It also imports their treating him with the utmost rage and fury ; for when a man tramples upon another, and stamps upon him with his foot, it is looked upon as a sign of the greatest rage ; and in this sense the expression is used, Isa. Ixiii. 3, G. Dan. viii. 10. And this answers to what he had said before of such wilful apostates, " They crucify to themselves," (or in themselves, /. e. in the rage and enmity of their hearts and blasphemies,) " the Son of God afresh, and put him '' to an open shame," chap. vi. 6. This is their treatment of him whom they once acknowledged to be the true Mes- siah, the beloved Son of God, and Saviour of the world ! Surely the punishment of such must be infinitely more se- vere than that which was inflicted on the despisers of Mo- ses' law. Another aofaravatino- inaredient in this sin is, — and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherezoith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, — ] The " blood of *' the covenant" is the blood of the Son of God, called " the blood of the everlasting- covenant," chap. xiii. 20. It is Christ's " blood of the new covenant, which was shed " for many for the remission of sins," Matt. xxvi. 28. and by which he ratified the covenant and sanctified the peo- ple, Heb. xiii. 12. This precious blood of Christ which hath procured the new covenant and all its blessings, the apostate esteems no better than common or unclean blood, a thing of no more value, or efiicacy, than the blood of a common malefactor ; and to aggravate his guilt it is added, " wherewifh he was sanctified." — CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. Ill Some have a doubt if these words belonged originally to the text ; for they are not in the Alexandrian copy, and Chrysostom omits them; but as they are to be found in the greater part of ancient MSS. it would be unsafe to leave them out. Commentators, however, who admit them to be genuine differ as to their meaning. Some understand the words to signify " the blood of the covenant wherewith he," that is, Christ, " was sanctified," which they think agrees with what he says, " For their sakes I sanctify myself," John xvii. 19. Christ indeed sanctified himself, that is, he de- dicated, devoted, or set himself apart to God as a sacrifice for the sins of his people, and that, on the ground of his oblation once offered, he might officiate as their High- priest in heaven. But ayja^Eiv, to sanctify, in this epistle, signifies to cleanse or purify from the guilt of sin by the blood of sacrifice, chap. ii. 11. ix. 13. xiii. 12. And as Christ Mas without sin, and knew no sin, though he was made a sin offering for us, 2 Cor. v. 21, Heb. iv. 15. he could not in that sense sanctify himself, as he needed not, like the legal high-priests, to offer up sacrifice, first for his own sins, and then for the people's, chap. vii. 27. I am therefore of opinion, that the person who is here said to have been sanctified is not Christ but the apostate ; and that this is stated as a most dreadful aggravation of his guilt and ingratitude, that he should count the blood of the covenant wherewith he himself was sanctified a com- mon or unholy thing. But it will be asked. In what sense can it be said, that one who turns out an apostate was ever sanctified ? In an- swer to this let it be observed. That the Scriptures speak of men according to their profession and outward appear- ance. The apostles, in writing to the churches, address them as saints, elect, faithful, and sanctified, 1 Cor. i. 2. 1 Pet. i. 2. that being- their professed and visible charac- ter. When individuals of them apostatized from the pro- fession of the faith, it is not attributed to their having never 112 A COMMENTARY ON f^CHAP. X. known the gospel, nor experienceil any benefit from it ; on tlie contrary, it is admitted that they have, and that there- by their guilt is highly aggravated, 2 Pet. ii. 20, 21. The Lord of the wicked unmerciful servant is represented as having- forgioen him all his debt. Matt, xviii. 27, 32. The fruitless blind professor is said to have been purged from his old sins, 2 Pet. i. 9. and the false teachers to de- ny the Lord that bought them, 2 Pet. ii. I. The apostate is supposed to have been once enlightejied in the know- ledge of the truth, Heb. vi. 4. x. 26. to have received the word with JO?/ and believed for a while, Luke viii. 13, and to have tasted of the heavenly gift, and of the good word of God, Heb. vi. 4, 5. Though there may be an essential difference between such attainments and those of true Christians, yet we cannot distinguish them in their abstract nature, but only by their concomitants and effects. The things specified seem to imply, that the apostate had been once sanctified by the blood of Christ, so far as to ex- perience its efficacy in relieving and purging his conscience from the guilt of sin and fear of wrath, and to give him some degree of joy and peace, as well as to produce some partial reformation on his life : But that now he despises that sanctifying blood of the covenant, accounting it a common or unholy thing. To complete the description of this dreadful sin, the apostle adds, — and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace .?] The Holy Spirit is the author of every gracious disposition of heart, which is called the fruit of the Spirit, Gal. v. 22,23; but I apprehend he is here called the Spirit of grace, as being the author of those miraculous powers and spiri- tual gifts which are termed grace, Rom. xii. 6. Eph. iv. 7. and which in the first age were conferred on believers for the spread and confirmation of the gospel : When there- fore any apostatized from the faith of Christ to Judaism, after having witnessed those miraculous gifts, and especial- ly after having been possessed of them himself, as is sup- posed, Mat. vii.22. Heb.vi. 4, 5. he could not possibly CHAP. X.] THE liPISTLE TO THE MEnUEWS. IV3 evade the force of such proofs, but by joining- issue with the Scribes and Pharisees in absurdly ascribing- them to the agency of evil spirits, Mat. xii. 24. than which a greater indignity and more malicious insult could not be offered to the Spirit of God. And this is that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit which our Lord declares shall never be forgiven either In this world, or in the world to come, ver. 31, 32. Therefore the punishment of such a sinner must be inexpressibly greater than that death without mercy which was inflicted on the despisers of Moses' law, which was only the death of the body by the hands of men ; whereas the punishment of such audacious apostates is to be inflicted by the immediate hand of God himself. Ver. 30. For we know him that hath said, " Vengeance " belongeth unto me, I will recompence,''^ saith the Lord — ] This citation is from Deut.xxxii. 35. and the apostle in- troduceth it with the words, " For we know him who " hath said," q. d. we know his character, that he is a God of irresistible power and inflexible justice ; and as the rig-hteous and supreme judge of the world, is determined to punish incorrigible offenders in proportion to the malignity of their crimes, for he hath said, "Vengeance " belongeth unto me ; I will recompence." The words " saith the tiord/' are neither in the original Hebrew nor Greek translation, but are added by the apostle to shew that God is the speaker, as they are also in Rom xii, 19. xiv. 11. 2Cor. vi. 17. The citation applies in general to all cases which call for divine vengeance. In Rom. xii. 19. it is used to dissuade Christians from aveng-ing them- selves on their ensmies or persecutors, but to leave that to God, who hath said, "Vengeance is mine; I will repay." The law of Christ forbids us to avenge ourselves, or even to harbour resentment in our hearts against those who have injured us : On the contrary, we are called to imitate Christ's example, "who, when he was reviled, reviled not again ; " when he suffered, he threatened not ; but committed his "cause to him that jiulgeth righfeously," IPet.ii. 23, Vol. II. 1 114 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. And thongh to maintain peace and good order in the king- doms of this world, the magistrate is ordained as the" mi- " nister of God, a revenger to execute wrath on him that "doth evil," Rom.xiii. 1, 4. yet as "Christ's kingdom " is not," like the Jewish Theocracy, a kingdom " of this " world," John xviii. 36. so he has not authorized the ruling powers to compel their subjects, by civil pains and penal- ties, to embrace the gosj)el, or to observe its peculiar in- stitutions, nor punish with the sword those whom they may consider as infidels, hereticks, or apostates. The ven- geance due to such, God has reserved in his own hand, who is the only competentand infallible judge of what pu- nishment they deserve, and is fully able to inflict it in a just proportion to the demerit of their guilt. On this sub- ject the apostle brings forward another citation from the same passage : — Atid again, " The Lord shall judge his people.**^ This is taken from Deut. xxxii.36. and we have the same words in Psal.cxxxv. 14. The word xgivw, to jugde, is used in different and sometimes opposite senses, according to the connection in which it stands, or the characters of those who are the subjects of it. Sometimes it signifies to plead the cause of his people by delivering or defending them, 1 Sam. xxiv. 12, 15. Psal. xliii. 1. Ixxxii. 3, 4. At other times it signifies to punish or take vengeance on transgres- sors. Gen. XV. 14. 2 Chron. xx. 12. Ezek. vii. 3. Both these senses are implied in Deut. xxxii. 36. The Lord often judged or punished his people, old Israel, by means of their enemies, when they rebelled against him ; but after- wards, when they were reduced to the utmost extremity, he is said to " repent himself for his servants, when he '' seeth that their power is gone, and there is none shut up " or left ;" for then, by turning his hand, which punished his people, against their enemies, he judged them both, by delivering the former, and taking- vengeance on the latter ; and this seems to be the literal meaning of the passage. But as the apostle is here speaking of the dreadful punish- CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 115 ment of apostates from the Christian faith : — as those Avhoiii he has more immediately in view were Hebrews Avho are supposed, after having' been once enlightened, to have fallen back to Judaism, and turned out inveterate enemies of Christ and his followers : — and as such were apt to flat- ter themselves with impunity on account of their bein<; God's people, distinguished from the heathen by their national covenant, and zealous observers of the Mosaic in- stitutions ; — therefore he cites this passage from Moses in order to shew, that the Lord will judge, u e. punish his professing- people when they rebel against him, and that with grreater severity than he does others, in proportion to the superior advantages which they have enjoyed, but abused with such horrid ingratitude and contempt. See Mat. xi. 21—25. Luke xii. 47, 48. Ver. 31. It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.'] W^hen any of old Israel sinned against God presumptuously, or with an high hand, they were to be tried by the judges and punished with death ; and when, as a nation, they revolted from God, and fell into idolatry, &c. he often punished them by means of their heathen enemies ; yet the power of human instruments could ex- tend no farther than to kill the body, nor could they pro- tract the sufferings of any a moment beyond that : But it must be infinitely more dreadful to fall as victims of ven- geance into the immediate hand of the living God himself, who is of almighty power to execute wrath to the utmost extremity on the despisers of his Son and Spirit ; and as he lives for ever, is able for ever to perpetuate their suf- ferings. See Luke xii. 4, 5. Mat. xxv. 41, 46. Mark ix. 43 —49. 2 Thes.i.8,a The account which the apostle gives here of wilful apostacy, as doing despite to the Spirit of grace, seems to be much the same with what our Lord says of the sin against the Holy Ghost, in his caution to the Pharisees when they ascribed his casting out devils to the agency of the prince of devils ; for it is not clear that he is there I 2 116 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. char«^ing' them with having actually committed that sin, or that they were capable of committing it before the full and complete testimony of the Spirit was given to Christ, which was not till after his resurrection and glorification. Compare John vii. 39. xv.2(). xvi. 8 — 15. with Acts ii. 33, 36. V. 32. he on that occassion declares, that "the blas- "phemy against the Holy Ghost shall not be forgiven " unto men," Mat. xii.31. But some have endeavoured to soften his words, and would have him to mean, that it shall not be forgiven without repentance ; which would im- ply, either that other sins maybe forgiven without repent- ance, or that there is no difference between this and any other sin in respect of repentance or forgiveness; whereas this sin is distinguished from all other sins in both these respects. As to repentance, the apostle says, that " it is "impossible to renew them again unto repentance," Heb. vi. 4, 6. And with respect to forgiveness, while our Lord admits that "all manner of sin and blasphemy shall be for- " given unto men," he absolutely declares, that "the bias- " phemy against the Holy Ghost shall never be forgiven, " neither in this world, nor in the world to come." Mat. xii. 31, 32. Mark iii.28, 29. But as some weak Christians, from ignorance of the na- ture of the unpardonable sin, and of the real state of their own minds, or perhaps from a tincture of melancholy, are apt to suspect that they have committed it, it may be pro- per, before we dismiss this subject, to observe, 1. That no sin, however great, which men may commit through ignorance and unbelief, or previous to their having received the knowledge of the truth, is the unpardonable sin. The crucifixion of Christ was certainly a sin of the first magnitude ; yet, amidst the tortures of the cross, he prayed for his murderers, " Father, forgive them ; for they know not what they do," Luke xxiii.34. which prayer was undoubtedly answered. Peter chargeid home on the Jews their having killed the Prince of life ; yet as he knew that through ignorance they did it, as did also their rulers, he CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 117 calls them to repent and be converted that their sins may be blotted out, Acts iii. 11, 17, 19. Saul of Tarsus was a cruel persecutor of Jesus, compelling his disciples to blas- pheme ; ye he obtained mercy, because he did it ignorantly in unbelief, 1 Tim. i. 13. 2. No act of sin, however heinous, and even though com- mitted after being once enlightened, if the word of God calls to repent of it, and contains any instance of repentance or forgiveness for that or such like sin, can be considered as the unpardonable sin. A call to repentance always sup- poses that there is place for it. It implies, that upon re- pentance and application to the blood of Christ for cleans- ing, pardon will be granted ; and this is expressly promised, Prov. xxviii. 13. 1 John i. 9. David, thouoh enliffhtened by the Spirit and an inspired prophet, fell into the sin of adultery and deliberate murder ; yet he repented and was forgiven, 2 Sam. xii. 7 — 14. Psal. xxxii. 5. Peter, after his faith had been approved of, denied his Lord thrice, with imprecations and oaths ; yet he obtained repentance and forgiveness. Mat. xxvi. 69 — ^75. The churches of Galatia after they had been called into the grace of Christ, were in a great measure subverted from the faith by false teachers ; yet the apostle travailed in birth of them again until Christ was formed in them. Gal. i. 6. iii. 1, 3, 4. iv. 9, 15, 19. In short, there may be many grievous occasional sins committed by real Christians, after having received the kuoAvledge of the truth, and tasted of the good word of God, which, though highly aggravated, are none of them that wilful sin which the apostle describes, nor what our Lord calls the blasphemy against the Holy Ghost which shall never be forgiven. 3. From the scripture account of this sin it may easily be distinguished from all others — 1 . It is a wilful sin, and committed not through mistake, or reluctantly through the overbearing force of temptation, but of design, and from a deliberate determination of mind ; which considering the knowledge (hey have of the truth, must involve in it the 118 A COMMKNTARY ON [cilAP. X. most (larino- presumption. — 2. It is termed a falling azoay, or drawing back ; not merely a partial decline or backslid- ing-; but a total apostacy from the faith of the gospel; openly and avowedly renouncing- Christ, the profession of his name, and all part and interest in him, and disclaiming all allegiance and subjection to him. — 3. This is clear, from the hatred, malice, and contempt with which they treat him : They are represented as crucifying to them- selves the Son of God afresh, putting him to an open shame, treading him under foot, and counting his blood an unholy thing. And because the Holy Spirit bore wit- ness to him by his miraculous operations and spiritual gifts, therefore they spitefully insult the Spirit of grace, by blasphemously ascribing these to evil spirits. From this account of the unpardonable sin we may see, that it is not a simple transient act, or occasional transgres- sion of a particular precept, but a wilful, total and avowed apostacy from the faith of the gospel, and that in the face of all the supernatural evidence by which its truth is con- firmed ; in opposition to all the motives to stedfastness which it holds forth, and in violation of all the obligations which they have come under ; This can be accounted for upon no other principle than a deep rooted and settled en- inity of heart against Christ, his holy character, and the way of salvation through him. As there is no remission of sin without a sacrifice, and no effectual sacrifice for sin, but that which they despise and reject ; so nothing remains to them but a certain fearful looking for of judgment, ver. 27. Avhicli instead of disposing them to repentance, only serves to increase tlieir enmity, it being a desperate lioppT- less fear of him as tlieir enemy, such as devils have. The design of the apostle in setting before the Hebrews the awful consequences of apostacy, was to put them upon their guard against every approach towards it, and to make them take heed lest there should be in any of them an evil heart of unbelief, in departing from the living God ; which is always a necessary caution, especially in times of rilAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 119 particular temptation, or when symptoms of that sin begin to appear. But it was far from his design to drive any of them into despair, or even to discourage them, but the very reverse. Therefore persons ought to beware that they charge not this sin either on themselves or others, without a due consideration and knowledge of its nature as described by the apostle, and having the fullest evidence that the description really applies to the case. When a man throu£jh mistake imaffines that he has committed the unpardonable sin, it will have the most pernicious effects upon him. For though he should still highly prize the gospel salvation, and think them happy who partake of it, (which does not consist with this sin;) yet the, apprehen- sion that he has forfeited that salvation, and is himself cut off from any part or interest in it, must overturn his faith in the atonement, and hope in divine mercy, fill him with terror and despair, and militate against every principle of love and obedience. The apostle, having cautioned the Hebrews against apostacy, encourages them to persevere, by reminding them of the divine support they had formerly received under very severe trials for Christ and which made them sustain them with courage and joy. Ver. 32. But call to remembrance the former days, in ziihich after ye were illuminated, ye endured a great fight of affiictions ;] Soon after the Hebrews were enlightened in the knowledge of the truth, they were called to sustain a great a.9Xinaiv, combat of afflictions by persecution from their countrymen; particularly that which beg-an at the death of Stephen, Acts viii. 1. and soon afterwards by He- rod, chap. xii. 1. The sufferings of the churches in Judea are also mentioned in 1 Thess. ii. 14. and they had all their share in these distressing conflicts one way or other; for he adds, Ver. 33. Partly lohilst ye were made a gazing-stock, both by reproaches and ajjlictions ; — ] The word rendered a gazing'Stock is ^sxlqit^ofxevot, which signifies to be made 120 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. public spectacles, as malefactors in a theatre. Christians were sometimes exposed to wild beasts in the public the- atres, and to this Paul seems to allude in 1 Cor. xv. 32. But we do not read of the Jews exercising- this species of cruelty in the two iirst persecutions to which he here refers ; and therefore the expression may be understood figuratively of their being put to public disgrace and open shame, by all maimer of defamation, and reproaches ; and also by afflictions, that is, punishments inflicted on their bodies ; for they were committed to prison, beaten in the synagogues and judgment halls, and several of them were actually put to death. See Acts v. 18, 40. viii. 3. xxii. 19. xxvi. 10, 11. These afflictions they suflPered partly in their own persons ; he adds, — and partly zchilst ye became companions of them that zcere so used .] As they were deeply interested in the common cause for which their Christian brethren were so treated, so they felt not only for themselves, but also for them, as being- members of one body; and they openly owned, kept company with them, shared in their re- proaches and afflictions, and comforted and assisted them to the utmost of their power. This he instanceth in his own case ; Ver. 24. For ye had compassion of me in my bonds, — ] Or, avvsTTo^TiaaTs, ye suffered loith me. As me is a supple- ment here, and as some respectable MSS. and ancient versions read rou hsixion, zcith those in bonds, instead of Tojy ^a^ixiois jw,h, in my bonds, that reading is adopted by some. But as the common reading, which is followed by our translators, is supported by the greatest number of MSS, and as the other reading seems to have originated with the Vulgate versions by which some other MSS. were early corrected, (See Macknight's Gen. Pref. to the Epis- tles, p. 3, 4, 5. 2d. edit.) the common reading ought to be preferred. Paul was well acquainted with what the be- lieving Hebrews suffered in the first persecution, for he had a most active hand in it; but when he was converted, CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBUEM'S. 121 and became a zealous promoter of the faith which he once destroyed, he then experienced the same treatment himself, 2 Cor. xi. 23, 24, 32. Some have ascribed the writing- of this epistle to Clement, some to Barnabas, others to Luke, as has been observed ; but there is no mention in Scripture of any of these having ever been in bonds in Judea, as the author of this epistle must have been ; whereas we know that Paul was in bonds at Jerusalem, where he was appre- hended, Acts xxi. 33. and was afterwards kept a prisoner at Cesarea for more than tAvo years, where his acquain- tance were permitted to come and minister unto him, Acts xxiv. 23, 27. and it is to their sympathy and kindness to- wards him M'hile in that situation that he here refers. He next takes notice of another part of their sufferings, and of the noble spirit with M'hicli they bore it; ■ — and took joyfully the spoiling of your goods, knowing in yourselves that ye have in heaven a better and an enduring substance.'] They had not only suffered in their character, their persons, and by their fellow-feeling with their per- secuted brethren ; but also by the loss of their goods or substance, which was violently wrested from them by their rapacious persecutors. But it may be asked, why does he bring to their view these afflicting scenes ? Certainly not to discourage them, but as the means of bringing also to their recollection the state of mind with which they bore these trials, and what it was that supported them under them. They took the spoiling of their goods not re- luctantly but joyfully, because they knew in themselves, or were fully persuaded in their own minds by the pro- mise of God and the earnest of the Spirit in their hearts, that they had in heaven a better and an enduring sub- stance. The lively faith and hope of this made them cheerfully suffer the loss of their worldly temporal sub- stance rather than deny Christ, or relinquish their prospect of the heavenly inheritance. Their calling to remem- brance that joyful hope which supported them under their former sufferings for Christ, had a tendency to renew their 122 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. fortitude, and to excite repentance in siicli of them as niiglit have since g-iven way to unbelieving discourage- ments, as tlie ground of hope still remained the same. From these encouraging considerations he exhorts them, Ver. 35. Cast not azoay, therefore, your confidence, zchich hath great recompence of reward."] As if he had said, See- ing ye have formerly suffered so much both in your per- sons and property, and have sustained these trials with courage and resolution, being supported under them with the joyful hope of eternal life ; (io not faint or be disheart- ened upon the approach of similar or even additional trials: "Cast not away your confidence," (Tra^pyjjiav) or your boldness, freedom or courage in your profession of Christ's name, and firm adherence to his cause, whatever sufferings you may endure. To encourage them to asted- fast perseverance in this, he adds, " which hath great re- " compence of reward." He seems to refer to our Lord's words, who, after having mentioned the different kinds of persecutions which his disciples might expect to meet with in this world for his sake, says, " Rejoice and be ex- ** ceeding glad ; for great is your reward in heaven," Mat. V. 12. Their sufferings might be indeed very great ; but they were not worthy to be compared with the glory which shall be revealed in them, Rom. viii. 18. In a com- parative view all the afflictions which the saints suffer for Christ in this world are but light and for a moment, but they work out for them a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory, 2 Cor. iv. 17. But as no affliction for the present seemeth to be joyous but grievous, and when se- vere and of long continuance, men are apt to be wearied and faint in their minds, therefore he says, Ver. 36. For ye have need of patience, that after ye have dotie the will of God, ye might receive the promise.] Patience is that fruit of the Spirit which enables a Chris- tian to bear afflictions and calamities with constancy and composure of mind, joined with a cheerful submission to the will of God ; and is opposed to fretting, repining, or CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 123 giving- way to despoiulency under the afflicting dispensa- tions of his providence. It is said, " tribulation worketh patience ;" it gives an opportunity for its exercise and im- proves it, Rom. v. 3. Jam. i. 2, 3, 4. This is the effect of sanctified afflictions, and without patience they do not profit, but have a contrary tendency. The Hebrews suf- fered persecution from their countrymen for the cause of Christ, and so had need of patience. It was absolutely necessary in such circumstances to their perseverance in holding fast the faith and the open profession of it ; con- sequently, it was necessary in order to their obtaining at last the promised reward ; and so he says, " ye have need " of patience, that, having done the will of God, ye may " receive the promise." They were to do the will of God not only by obeying his commands, but also by patiently suffering according to his will for righteousness' sake, 1 Pet. iii. 17. iv. 19. and having persevered to the end in doing the will of God, they were to receive the accom- plishment of the promise, viz. eternal life, 1 John ii. 25. Patience here may also signify a humble and submissive waiting for the accomplishment of the promised deliver- ance from trouble in God's own time, although it may seem to be delayed. This sense agrees more with the passage alluded to in the next verse. Ver. 37. For yet a little while, and he that shall come will come, and will not tarry.'\ The words in this and part of the following verse allude to what Habakkuk says of his vision, chap. ij. 3, 4. but are not introduced as a di- rect quotation from him. There is a variation in the words; and as to the events referred to, they are quite different. Habakkuk is foretelling the deliverance of Ju- dah from captivity after an appointed time, and the pu- nishment of their enemies the Chaldeans by the overthrow of the Babylonian empire: But the apostle is here en- couraging the believing Hebrews to persevere in faith and patience under their present trials, by the near prospect of Christ's coming to deliver them from the persecutions 124 A COMMENTARY ON [cHAP. X. of the unbelieving Jews, by destroying Jerusalem and overthrowing the Jewish church and state. He that shall come^ or, o ^y^o^x^ms, he who is coming, was an appellation given by the Jews to the Messiah, Mat. xi. 3. xxi. 9. But it is evident that the apostle here does not refer either to his first or second personal coming. Not to his Jirst when he came in the flesh; for he had thus come more than sixty years previous to the date of this epistle, and therefore it could not then be matter of promise which the Hebrews were to wait for. Nor does he refer to his second coming at the last day, to raise the dead and judge the world, for that was not to take place in a little while, (a mistake which some had fallen into, 2 Thess. ii. 2, 3.) ; nor has it yet taken place after the lapse of near eighteen hundred years. But it should be observed, that there are other comings of Christ spoken of besides these two. He promised that after his ascension, he woidd come to his disciples in the power of his Spirit to set up his kingdom in the world. John xiv. 18, 19. and this promise he fulfilled on the day of pentecost, Acts ii. — He promised to come in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. Mat. xxiv. 30. Rev. i. 7. which was fulfilled in the destruction of the city and temple of Jerusalem, and in the punishment of his malicious enemies the Jews, Mat. xxiv. 2, 21, 22, 29. This he repeatedly terms the coming of the Son of man, ver. 27, 30, 37. — x\gain he came to punish and dethrone the hea- then powers of the Roman empire, to overthrow the esta- blished idolatry, and to deliver his people from along train of bloody persecutions, as was foreshewn to John, Rev. vi. 12. to the end, xii. 7, 8, 9. — Farther, he came to overthrow the man of sin and son of perdition, viz. the apostate church of Rome. The apostle clearly foretold, that the Lord would consume him with the breath of his mouth, and destroy him with the brightness of his coming, 2 Thess. ii. 8. See also Rev. xvii. xviii. xix. 11 — 21. and this he is now fast accomplishing. In bliort, Christ is said to come CHAP. X.3 THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 125 as often as he thinks fit to interpose by any signal act of liis power and providence, either for the advancement of his kingdom, the deliverance of his people, or the punishment of his enemies. So that to every state and period of the church, there is a coming of Christ suited to their con- dition. Now, as the Hebrew Christians had been always more or less persecuted by their unbelieving countrymen th€ Jews, the apostle encourages them, under these trials, by the near prospect of Christ's coming to deliver them; and alludingto Habakkuk's words, says, " For yet a little while " and he that shall come, will come, and will not tarry.' For Christ had promised, that when he should execute vengeance on his enemies the Jewish nation, his friends would not only be preserved from that calamity, Luke xxi. 18, 19. but obtain deliverance from their persecutions. "And when these things begin to come to pass, then look "up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption," or deli- verance, " draweth nigh," ver. 26. He had also told them, that these events would soon take place, " Verily, I say " unto you. This generation shall not pass away till all be " fulfilled," ver. 32. So that it was but a little while, and only about eight or nine years after the writing- of this epistle. This day of vengeance was to come unexpectedly as a snare upon the Jewish nation, ver. 35. for though they were repeatedly forewarned of it, they did not be- lieve it, any more than their forefathers believed the threatened judgment by the Chaldeans. Compare Hab. i. 5. with Acts xiii. 41. But Christ admonishes his dis- ciples to make a proper use of the warning he had given them of the near approach of that day, " Take heed toyour- " selves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with " surfeiting and drunkenness, and the cares of this life, " and so that day come upon you unawares. Watch ye, " therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted " worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, " and to stand before the Son of man," Luke xxi. 34, 36. 126 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. So also James and Peter, apostles of the cireiimcision, ex- hort the ))elievini>- Jews to patience, watchfulness and prayer, in the prospect that the end of all things relating to the Jewish church and state was at hand, James v. 7,8. 1 Pet. iv. 7. These, indeed, are duties which are always incumbent on Christians in every period of the church until Christ come again ; but especially on the approach of dreadful judgments, with the dangers and temptations which attend them. Ver. 38. Now the just shall live hy faith; — ] These words are taken from Hab. ii. 4. and, according to their arrangement in the common translation, might be under- stood to signify, that the just or righteous man shall live by his faith as the influencing principle of his life or con- duct ; as when Paul says, " We walk by faith, not by sight." 2 Cor. V. 7. and '* the life which I now live in the flesh, I live by the faith of the Son of God." Gal. ii. 20. But the order of the words in the original is, "Now the just by *' faith shall live :" That is, the man who is just or righ- teous by faith, shall live, be saved or obtain eternal life. That the apostle understood the words in this sense is evident from two other places where he quotes them. The first is, Rom. i. IG, 17. " For I am not ashamed of "the gospel of Christ — for therein is the righteousness of " God by faith revealed (sjy) unto faith : as it is written, " The just by faith shall live." This citation, therefore, must relate to the righteousness of God by faith, which is revealed in the gospel ; otherwise it is foreign to the apos- tle's subject, and could not be brought in as a proof of it. By the righteousness of God, I understand God's method of justifying sinners according to the tenor of the new co- venant, as afterwards explained in the four succeeding chapters : For after having proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin, and therefore that by the deeds of the law, there shall no flesh be justified in God's sight, chap. iii. f), 19, 20. Jie says, " But now the righte- " ousness of God without the law is manifested, Jxing CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 127 witnessed by the law and the prophets,'' ver. 21. The first testimony which he cites from the prophets is that in Habakkuk already mentioned, Rom. i. 17. The other is from Psal. xxxii. 1 , 2. where David describeth the bless- edness of the man unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works, as consisting in having his iniquities for- given, his sins covered, and not imputed, chap, iv.6 — .9. For the testimony of the law, or writings of Moses, he refers to Gen. xv. 6. " Abraham believed God, and it " was counted to him for righteousness," Rom. iv. 3. — On this passage he comments throughout the greater part of that chapter, shewing that the reward of Abraham's faith was not reckoned of debt, but of grace ; and that he wasjustified, not working, but believing- on him that justi- fieth the ungodly, having his faith counted to him for righ- teousness, ver. 4, 5, 9, 10. The second citation of Habakkuk's words is in Gal. iii. 11. '* But that no man is justified by the law in the sight "of God, it is evident ; for, the just by faith shall live." Here it is directly opposed to a man's obtaining life, or be- ing-justified by the works of the law ; and this is farther evident from the next verse, "And the law is not of "faith;" i, e. it does not propose faith as the means of obtaining life ; "but" itsaitb, "The man that doth these " things shall live in them," ver. 12. If, in both the fore-mentioned passages, the prophet's words are cited to prove that a man is just or righteous by his faith, as opposed to the works of the law, they must undoubtedly bear the same sense in the passage before us, and are a proper introduction to the following discourse about faith and its effects, in which we are expressly told, that without this principle of faith, it is impossible to please God, chap. xi. 6. The man therefore who is just or justi- fied by means of his faith, shall live : — hut if any man draw hack, my soul shall have no j)lea- sure in him.\ The original is, xa< sav zJ^rofeiXajTaj, " if he draw back," or apostatize, and the words any man, are ,128 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. inserted by the translators. Dr. Owen says, that the sup- '"plement is well added ; for the apostle is not speaking of " the same persons, but of different persons, — the jM^f and " the apostate." I imagine, that the reason for inserting thisjsupplement was to remove an apparent objection against the doctrine of the Jinal perseverance of the saints ; but I do not think it justifiable to add to the word of God, even thouffh it were to defend a truth. There is nothing^ ex- pressed in the words which intimates that different persons are intended ; but a change of the character and conduct of the same person is supposed to be possible, " if he draw back :" And indeed this is supposed in all the cautions against apostacy throughout this epistle ; for if the apostacy of professed Christians were considered as impossible, cau- tions and warnings against it would be needless. Yet the doctrine of the perseverance of the elect is suf- ficiently supported by scripture. For if God has chosen them in Christ before the foundation of the world, and pre- destinated them to the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, Eph. i. 4, 5. — If Christ has died to redeem them from the guilt, power, and consequences of sin, ver. 7. Gal.iii.ia Tit. ii. 14.— If God has effectually called them according to his purpose, and they are really washed, jus- tified, and sanctified in the name of the Lord Jesus, and by the Spirit of God, 2 Tim. i. 9. 1 Cor. vi. II.— If there is an inheritance reserved in heaven for them, and they are kept by the power of God through faith unto salvation, 1 Pet. i. 4, 5. — In fine, if there is an inseparable connection between their being foreknown, predestinated, called, and justified, and their being finally glorified, Rom. viii, 28 — 31 : — Then it is clear that they must persevere in faith and holiness unto the end, and at last receive the end of faith, even the salvation of their souls, 1 Pet. i. 9. If the perseverance of the elect were not sufficiently secured and provided for in the plan of redemption as an essential part of it, their salvation, if not altogether impossible, must rest at least upon a very precarious and uncertain founda- CHAP. X.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 129 tion, namely, their own ability instead of the power of God, who alone is able to keep them from falling-, Jude ver. 24. But then it must be observed, that the Scripture doc- trine of the perseverance of the elect is one thing-, and the particular application of it to the case of individuals is an- other. No elect person can know that he himself is elect- ed till he believes the gospel, or that he shall persevere unto the end, but while he is actually persevering in faith and holiness. The question is not, whether the elect shall persevere? that being a revealed truth: bvit the question is, whether he himself be one of that number ? This he ought not to take for granted without the testimony of his conscience that he possesses the scripture characters of a true believer. In order to this, he must give diligence to make his calling and election sure, by adding to his faith, courage, knowledge, temperance, patience, godliness, brotherly kindness and charity ; for in doing- these things he shall never fall, but an entrance shall be ministered to him abundantly into the everlasting kingdom of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, 2 Pet. i. 5 — ^11. Yet it is per- fectly consistent with this, and one of the means of his per- severance, that he should keep in view, that " if he draw back, God's soul shall have no pleasure in him :" that is, he shall be rejected and punished. This answers to the clause in Hab. ii. 4. " Behold, his " soul which is lifted up, is not upright in him." The apostle's words, at first sight, seem to differ much from our present Hebrew copies, and therefore it is thought that the Hebrew has undergone some alteration in this place. Hallett says, " The apostle's own authority, with- " out any other consideration, is sufficient proof to me, that " the reading which he hath chosen, was the true original '* reading in the prophet. However, it is proper to ob- " serve, that the Greek and Arabic versions of the prophet " read the text as the apostle does." Pocock maintains, that the Hebrew word gnuphla, rendeveC, lifted up, signifies VOL. II. K 130 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. X. also he who faints, as in Isa. li. 20. Jonah iv. 8. and in- deed in either sense maybe rendered vTro^stX'^lai, his draw- ing- back or apostatizing ; for men apostatize from the faith as well throuoh pride, self-confidence and impatience of spirit, as by fainting- under trials and afflictions for the cause of Christ : But faith stands opposed to both these ; and so the apostle exhorts the Hebrews, neither to despise the chastening- of the Lord nor faint when rebuked of him, ch.xii. 5. He also observes, that jasher, among other things^ signifies to please, and that the LXX. have tran- slated it by the word a^eff^siv, to please, in Num. xxiii. 27. feo that the passage may ])e translated as the apostle hath done, " Behold, he who faints" (or draws back,) " shall "not please his (viz. God's) soul. But the just by his faith " shall live." This is the order in which these two clauses stand in the prophecy; but the apostle, without in the least altering the sense, and probably for the sake of sub- joining the observation in the following- verse, places the first clause last, thus, " But if he draw back, my soul shall '* have no pleasure in him." Ver. 39. Btit zoe are not of them who draw back unto perdition ; but of them that believe to the saving of the soul.'] By we here the apostle includes himself vt^ith all true believers, and particularly those of them to whom he writes. Bnt he does not here declare absolutely, that none of those who then professed the faith would ever draw back (sjf aTroXsiav) unto perdition or destruction. Ho could assure no man of final salvation or the crown, but in the way he was assured of it in his own case, which ho describes thus, " I therefore so run, not as uncertainly ; so " fight I, not as one that beatclh the air : But 1 keep " under my body and bring it into subjection ; lest that " by any means, when I have preached to others, I myself " should be (oc'^oxiixos) a disapproved (or rejected) one." J Cor. ix. 26, 27. He therefore intends no more in this place than what he had expressed before in chap. vi.9. where, after having set before them the dreadful con- CHAP. X.} THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 131 sequences of apostacy, to prevent their being cast down and discouraged, he says, " But beloved, we are persuad- *' ed better things of you, and things that accompany sal- *' vation, though we thus speak." So here, after having again spoken the most awful things on that subject, he concludes with expressing his charitable persuasion and hope respecting tliem, that they were not of those who draw back from the faith unto their destruction ; but of those who would continue to believe, so as to obtain the salvation of the soul. k 2 132 CHAP. XI. CONTENTS AND SCOPE. In the latter end of the foregoing chapter, the apostle having reminded the Hebrews of their former fortitude, patience, and joy under sufferings for Christ, and encouraged them to persevere in that state of mind under their present trials, by referring them to a passage in Hab. ii. 3, 4. where it is said, " The just by faith shall live," he, in this eleventh chapter, illustrates that saying by a num- ber of examples from the Old Testament of per- sons, who, by faith and hope in God and his pro- mises, had triumphed both over all the allurements and terrors of the world. He begins with an account of the nature of faith in general, and describes it to be " the confidence " of things hoped for, the conviction of things not " seen," ver. 1. — That by this faith the ancient saints obtained a testimony of God's approbation, ver. 2. — And that it is by faith in divine revelation we understand that the worlds were framed by God's word of command ; so that the things which are seen were not made of the things which did appear, ver. 3. As examples of this faith and its practical in- fluence, he mentions among the antediluvians, Abel, Enoch, and Noah, ver. 4, 5, 6, 7. — Next he CHAP. XI.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 133 takes notice of the renowned ancestors of the Hebrews, such as Abraham, Sarah, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, and their lawgiver Moses ; and represents their faith not only as a belief of the promise of the land of Canaan, but of the resurrection of the dead and heavenly country, ver. 8 — 28. — He men- tions the faith of Israel in passing through the Red Sea, and also in compassing Jericho seven days in the firm belief that its walls would fall by a miracle ; and that the faith of the harlot Rahab saved her from perishing with the unbelievers when Jericho was taken, ver. 29, 30, 31. — He like- wise mentions some of the Israelitish judges, kings, and prophets who were remarkable for their faith, such as Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel, and the prophets. But because it would he tedious to speak of them all, or of every indi- vidual particularly, he introduces them in one group, and in an elevated strain, celebrates their fortitude, victories, works of righteousness, de- liverances, and rewards, all which he ascribes to the influence of their faith, ver. 32, 33, 34.— With equal rapture does he speak of the reproaches, afflictions, persecutions, tortures, and deaths which others afterwards endured for the sake of a good conscience towards God ; so that they were as illustrious for their passive, as others were for their active virtues ; while it is evident, that nothing could support them under such severe trials, but that faith wliich is the conviction of 134 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. XI. things hoped for in a future state, ver. 35, 30, 37, 38. The apostle concludes this animated discourse by observing-, that all these Old Testament wor- thies, having received an honourable testimony by faith, did not in this life receive the accomplish- ment of the promise respecting Christ and the good things to come, God having in prospect something better for us Christians, that they w^itli- out us should not be made perfect, ver. 39, 40. PARAPHRASE. Chap. XI. 1. Now faith, by which the just livef is the confidence of things hoped for, the convic- tion of things not seen. 2. For by it the ancients obtained a good tes- timony. 3. By faith in divine revelation we understand that the worlds were produced by the word of God, commanding them to be, so that the things which are seen, were not made of things which did appear. 4. By faith Abel offered to God a more accept- able sacrifice than Cain did, bringing not only a meat but a sin-offering , by which he obtained a tes- timony that he was righteous, God testifying this upon his gifts, and by this, he, being dead, yet speaketh. 5. By faith Enoch, the seventh from Adatn, was CHAP. XI.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 135 translated, that he mig'ht not see death, and was not found, because God had translated him ; for before his translation it was testified, that he pleas- ed God hy 7valking with him. 6. But without faith it is impossible to please God; for he that approaches to God, so as to worship him acceptably ^ must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them who diligently seek him. 7. By faith Noah, being" divinely warned con- cerning things not as yet seen, moved with pious fear, prepared an ark for the salvation of his family Jrom the deluge^ by which he condemned the im- helieving world ; and became an heir of the righte- ousness which is according to faith. 8. By faith in the divine promises , Abraham be- ing called to go out from his kindred a^d native country f unto a place which he was afterwards to receive for an inheritance, implicitly obeyed, and went out, not knowing whither he was going. 9. By faith he sojourned in Canaan the land of promise, as in a strange land, dwelling in tents with Isaac and Jacob, the co-heirs of the same promise. 10. For he expected the heavenly city, of which the planner and architect is God. 11. By faith even Sarah herself, who was barreuy received ability for the conception of seed, and when past the time of age brought forth a child, because she judged him faithful who had promised her a son. 136 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. XI, 12. Therefore there sprang- even from one, and he in these respects become dead, a race as the stars of heaven in multitude, and as the sand which is on the shore of the sea, innumerable. 13. All these died in faith, not having received the accomplishment of the promises ; but seeing them afar off, and being persuaded o/" them, and embrac- ing them, they confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth. 14. For they who say such things, declare plainly that they earnestly seek their native country. 15. And if indeed they had been mindful of Chalclea, that country from which they came out, they might have had an opportunity to return to it. 16. But now they eagerly desire a better country than any on earth, that is, an heavenly one : there- fore God is not ashamed to be called their God ; for he hath prepared a city for them, even the new Jerusalem. 17. By faith Abraham, when tried, offered up Isaac ; yea he who had received the promises offer- ed up his only begotten son : 18. Concerning whom it had been said, " That " in Isaac shall thy seed be called ;" 19. Accounting that, although he were burnt to ashes, God was able to raise him up even from the dead j from whence also he did receive him in a figure. 20. By faith Isaac blessed Jacob and Esau con- cerning things to come. CHAP. XI."] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 137 21. By faith Jacob, when dying', blessed each of the sons of Joseph, and worshipping God, bowed down upon the top of his staff. 22. By faith J oseph, approaching his end, made mention of the departure of the chiklren of Israel out of Egypt, and g-ave charge concerning' his bones. 23. By faith Moses, when born, was hid three months by his parents, because they saw the child remarkably beautiful, and they feared not the com- mand of the king", to destroy the male children. 24. By faith Moses, when he was grown up, re- fused to be called the son of Pharaoh's daughter Qvho had adopted him ; 25. Choosing" rather to be evil-treated with the people of God, than to have a temporary enjoy- ment of the pleasures of sin. 26. Esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures of Egypt ; for he looked oSfrom these to the recompence of reward in a fu- ture state. 27. By faith he left Egypt, not fearing the wrath of the king ; for he boldly persisted as seeing the invisible God under wliom he acted. 28. By faith he appointed the passover and the pouring out of the blood, that he who destroyed the first-born of the Egyptians might not touch theirs. 29. By faith they passed through the Red Sea, as by dry land, of which the Egyptians taking trial, were swallowed up. 138 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. XI. 30. By faith the walls of Jericho fell down, hav- ing' been encompassed seven days. 31. By faith Rahab the harlot was not destroyed with the unbelievers, having received the spies in peace and concealed them. 32. And what shall I say more ? for the time would fail me to give a narration concerning Gi- deon, and Barak, and Sampson, and Jephtha, and David, and Samuel, and the prophets ; 33. Who through faith vanquished kingdoms, wrought righteousness, obtained promises, stopped the mouths of lions, 34. Extinguished the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword,, were made strong from weak- ness, became mighty in battle, routed the camps of the aliens. 35. Women received their dead children by a re- surrection; but others were tortured, not accept- ing deliverance bi/ sinful compliances, that they might obtain a better resurrection. 36. And others had trials of mockery and scourg- ings, and moreover of bonds and imprisonment. 37. They were stoned, they were sawn asunder, they were tempted, they died by the slaughter of tlie sword, they went about clothed in slieep and in goat skins, being persons destitute, afflicted, and in all respects nial-treated ; 38. Of whom the world was not worthy : They wandered in deserts, and mountains, and lurked in dens and caves of the earth. CHAP. XI.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 13,9 39. Now all these, having obtained a good testi- mony on account of faith ; received not the accom- plishmejit of the promise in this life ; 40. God having provided (Gr. foreseen) some- thing better for us, that without us they should not be made perfect. COMMENTARY AND NOTES ON CHAP. XI. Ver. 1. Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.^ If the original word wij-iy signifies faith or belief, I do not see how it can properly be termed either the substance or evidence of things. Though it is essential to faith to have an object, real or imaginary, without which it cannot exist, as in that case nothing is believed ; yet belief is not the substance of its object; and though evidence is also essential to faith, without which it would be mere irrational credulity ; yet belief is not evidence, but the effect of perceiving it. We shall therefore enquire a little into the scripture sense of these two words. As to vTco'ia.ais, though substance may nearly express its etymology ; yet its use in the sacred scriptures is chiefly to be consulted. The English word substance occurs about sixty times throughout our translation, but in none of them does it signify faith,, nor is the original word v-zso^oiuisy but in general vzsag^is or v-ita^y^o^la., Avhich signify a man's worldly goods or substance. The LXX. fre- quently use vzsotag7y§7)&y)(Tav, " obtained a good report ;" so this word is also translated in Acts vi. 3. and x. 32. God testified his acceptance of their faith with its fruits, and caused it to be recorded in his word, to transmit their example and perpe- tuate their honour to all succeeding generations. Ver. 3. By faith we understand that the zcorlds zeerc framed by the loord of God ; — ] The original ra? aiwvar, literally signifies the ages; but the succeeding clause shews that it here signifies the material fabric of the Avorlds, being termed " the things which are seen." The worlds comprehend the sun, moon, stars, and this earth, called by Moses "the heavens and the earth." Gen. i. 1. These Avere framed '^ the original is xacluqlia^ai, which CHAP. XT.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 143 signifies were prepared, fitted up, and, like the different parts of a macliine, set in their proper place and order. The first exertion of God's power in the material creation was his creating out of nothing the matter or substance of things, which was a confused fluid mass or chaos, void of light, form or order, and by Moses is called the deep. Gen. i. 2. The succeeding work of the six days was his bringing all things into their present form, beauty and order, out of the dark unseen mass. All this was effected *' by the word of God," that is, his word of command, saying. Let it be, and it was, Gen. i. 3, 7, 9, &c. " For he " spake, and it was done ; he commanded, and it stood " fast." Psal. xxxiii. Q, 9. God indeed made all things by the divine person of the Logos, who was in the begin- ning with God, and was God, John i. 1,2; but the word here used is pruxoc, which never signifies the person of Christ, but a word uttered or spoken, though it appears that it was by his Son that God spoke the worlds into ex- istence and order both as to matter and form ; — so that the things which are seen, were 7iot made of things which do appear.^ The ra CXswo/xava, " things which are " seen," are the materials which compose the visible universe. These " were not made of things which do (or " rather did) appear." Some render the words, were " made of things which do not appear," i. e. by the in- visible things of God, his eternal power and Godhead, Rom. i. 20. But, as Dr. Owen observes, cpa/voptsvwv seems rather to respect the material than efficient cause, and signifies the conformed materials of the chaos, which, when created, did not at first appear, because ''darkness " was upon the face of the deep." Gen. i. 2. Peirce and Macknight understand the apostle to mean, that the things which are seen were not made of things which did exist, i. e, of any pre-existent matter to form them of. But though this is a truth in one sense> yet I am not clear that it is what the apostle means ; for it makes the appear- ance and existence of things to be the same ; whereas we 144 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. XI. know that tilings miglit exist, tliough they did not appear. However, the ditierence is not very material, as they agree that the original matter, as well as form and order of the universe, was created or brought into existence by the word of God. It will probably be asked, if it is by faith in revelation we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, hoAV could the Gentiles, who had not that revela- tion, iniderstand by the things which are made, the eternal power and Godhead of their maker, as our apostle affirms, Rom. i. 20? To this it may be answered, that these things are perfectly consistent ; for the same truth that may be known in some degree by reason and observation, may be more fully and certainly known by revelation, and so be- come a matter of faith. Thus though it be partly evident to reason by the things Avhich are made, that the Maker of them is possessed of eternal power and Godhead ; yet that truth, being expressly and clearly revealed in Scrip- ture, and believed upon the authority of God, is then un- derstood by faith, which is, " the conviction of things not '' seen." That the worlds exist we know by our senses : That they were originally made is obvious to our reason ; but that they were made by the icord of God, and that out of nothing-, could be known only by revelation, and under- stood by faith. Accordingly, many of the heathen philo- sophers, who had limited notions of the power of God, and were ignorant of the scripture account of creation, ima- gined, that the matter of which the worlds are composed is self-existent and eternal. Ver. 4. By faith Abel offered unto God a more excel- lent sacrijice than Cain — ] It is observed by critics, that the word zsKsma in the comparative degree, signifies more in number rather than in value. Cain offered " the fruit " of the ground," which was only the mi/icha, or meat- offering, but no proper sacrifice for sin. Gen. iv. 3. Where- as Abel (besides the fruit of the ground, which M^as one of his gifts,) " also brought of the firstlings of his flock, and CHAP. XI.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS. 145 "of the fat thereof;" which was a sin-ofTering', and by these he sheM'ed both his sense of the divine bounty and of his own sinfulness. And as he did this hy faith, he must have had a revelation of the will of God respecting the appointment of sacrifices as a prefiguration of the man- ner in which the promised Seed of the woman was to bruise the serpent's head, viz. by the sacrifice of himself, Gen. iii. 15. Heb. ii. 14, 15. — hy which he obtained zoitness that he loas righteous, — ] That is, by means of his sacrifice as offered in faith, he obtained a testimony that he was righteous, and that both he and his offering were accepted of God ; for it is record- ed, that " the Lord had respect to Abel, and to his offer- *' ing," Gen. iv. 4. which is equivalent to a declaration that he was righteous. • — God testifying of his gifts, — ] God testified'his accep- tance of Abel's o-ifts. It is not said in what manner. It might either be in words, or by some outward visible sign, such as causing fire to come down from heaven upon his sacrifice, as was done in after times upon particular occa- sions, Gen. XV. 17. Lev. ix. 24. 1 Kings xviii. 38. — afid by it he, being dead, yet speaketh.~\ By that ex- ample of his faith and acceptance, as recorded in the word of God, though he has been dead many years ago, he still speaketh, instructing* us, that God has from the beginning- had respect to the service of faith, and that it is only through faith in the atonement of Christ that sinners are made righteous and accepted of him. As Abel's sacrifice pi'efigured the sacrifice of Christ, which had been previ- ously intimated in the original promise, so his faith in of- fering it was " the conviction of things hoped for." Ver. 5. By faith Enoch ivas translated that he should not see death ; and was not found, because God had trans- lated him : — ] The words referred to, are in Gen. v. 24. " And Enoch walked with God, and he was not, for God " took him." The apostle agrees with the LXX.'s trans- lation of tliis passage, and has it, " he was not found," viz. Vol.. n. L 14G A COMMENTARY OX [CHAP. XI. on earth ; which intimates that search was made for him by the men of that generation, as was afterwards made for Elijah on a like occasion. 2 Kings ii. 17. But he could not be found ; and the reason given is, " for God took him," or as the LXX. and the apostle express it, because "God had translated him," i. e. taken him both soul and body up into heaven, " that he should not see death," as the apostle explains it. So the Jews understood Moses' account of this matter, as is evident from several passages in the Apocrypha. See Wisd. iv. 10. Ecclus. xliv. 16. xlix. 14. But as flesh and blood, in its present corrupti- ble state, cannot inherit the heavenly kingdom, 1 Cor. xv. 50, 51. so his body must have been changed in his trans- lation, or divested of all its gross corruptible qualities, Ii|ce the bodies of the saints who shall be alive and re- main at Christ's second coming. The apostle having said that it was by faith he was translated, proves it thus: — -for before his translation he had this testimony that he pleased God.'] The testimony referred to is this, " Enoch ** walked with God," Gen. v. 24. which the apostle, agree- ably to the LXX. renders '* he pleased God." That is, he walked in a constant course of strict piety and holy obedience to God, so as to please him, or obtain his ap- probation ; and it may also include his being a zealous maintainor of the faith and worship of the true God, a re- prover of wickedness, and a preacher of righteousness among the antediluvians ; for we are informed that he was a prophet, and warned them of the Lord's coming to exe- cute judgment upon the ungodly, Jude ver. 14, 15. Now from this testimony " that he pleased God," the apostle infers his faith. Ver. 6. But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.] There can scarcely be a more self-evident proposition than what the apostle here lays down, viz. That " without faith it is '' impossible to please God ;" and that whetlier we consi- CHAP. XI.] THE EPISTLE TO THE MEBREWS. 147 der this impossibility to relate to our serving God, or to God's being- pleased with our services. Without faith it is impossible for us to serve and worship God aright, or indeed at all ; for if we believe not that he is, our services cannot possibly have any respect to him ; and though we should in general admit his existence, yet if we believe not that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him, we can have no proper inducement to serve him, but must consider it to be vain and unprofitable, as the wicked do, Job xxi. 15. xxxiv. 9. Mai. iii. 14. Without faith it is not possible that any thing we do can be pleasing or acceptable to God, because it can have no regard to his will, autho- rity, or the enjoyment of his favour, who " taketh pleasure *'only in them that fear him, in those that hope in his " mercy." Psal. cxlvii. 11. This chiefly confutes two absurd tenets which some have adopted : One is, " That "it is of no consequence what men believe, if they live *' well ;" which is equivalent to saying, that it is of no con- sequence to please God ; for the apostle atfirms, that with- out faith it is impossible to please him. The other is, " That in serving God we ought to have no respect to the recompence of reward ;" whereas the apostle affirms, that faith is a belief not only that God is, but that he is " a re- *' warder of them that diligently seek him," and that Avith- out this faith we cannot please him. This account of faith illustrates both parts of the definition given of it in ver. 1. The belief that God is, is the confidence of things not seen ; and a belief that he is a rewarder of them that dili- gently seek him, is the conviction of things hoped for. Some are of opinion that the apostle is here only de- scribing what they call the heathen's creed ; and allege, that many of the heathen who had no supernatural reve- lation, believed that God is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him ; which, they think, are no- thing more than the principles of natural religion, and the dictates of unassisted reason. Hence, it is argued, that as Enoch was saved by that faith, so were they, if, like him, they walked suitably to their belief. l 2 '48 A COMMENTARY ON [CHAP. XI. But the premises are in a great measure false, ami- the conclusion altogether uncertain, and quite foreign to the scope and design of the whole context. With regard to the first article of this faith, viz. that God is, the apostle admits, that the Gentiles had such a display of his eternal power and Godhead by the things that are made, as to leave them quite inexcusable in their absurd idolatry, Rom. i. 19, 20.; yet he never supposes that unassisted nature, or reason, in its present state of depravity, could, without revelation, attain the true and saving- knowledge, and be- lief of the being and perfections of God. On the contrary, he declares, that "the world, by wisdom, knew not God," 1 Cor. i. 21. but did service unto them, " which, by nature, are no gods," Gal. iv. 8. Nay, they knew not that there was but one only, the living and true God, for they had gods many, and lords many, 1 Cor. viii. 5. It appears to me, therefore, that by a belief that God is, the apostle does not merely mean a general belief that there exists a first intelligent cause of all things, but a belief of the be- ing' and perfections of the one only true God in distinction from all idols, according to the revelation he hath made of himself in his word. With respect to the other article of this faith, viz. that he is a rezcarder of them that dili- gently seek him,, it is evident, that however consonant it is to reason, to believe that God will regard innocent creatures who serve him diligently, yet reason can never discover, with any degree of certainty, that he will be re- conciled to such as have rebelled against him, as all man- kind have; far less that he will accept their services, and reward them wifh eternal life. Our self-love, and fond hopes may suggest this; but the voice of nature and rea- son are uncertain, if not altogether silent upon the subject; and accordingly we find, that a future state of rewards or punishments was a matter of dispute and uncertainty among' heathen philosophers, and some of them absolutely denied it. The real belief of this article, therefore, must be founded entirely upon this revelation, or the divine pro- CHAP. XI.] THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS, 149 mise. This promise of eternal life, which is the reward, is spoken of through a great part of this chapter, and is shewn to be the ground of the ancient saints' faith of the heavenly reward, see verses 13, 39. And as God, wlio cannot lie, made this promise of eternal life before the times of ages, 1 Tit. i. 2. or upon the very back of the fall, it must have been revealed to Enoch, and believed by him, as it was by all the faithful in after ages. Farther, as this promise was founded upon the promise respecting Christ, through Avhom it was to be accomplished, so the faith of it must also have had a respect to him and his work, ac- cording* to the measure of revelation then given ; and that Enoch had the revelation of the Messiah to come, we can- not doubt, whether we consider his acquaintance with the first promise. Gen. iii. 15. or his being a prophet, who fore- told not only the judgment impending over the antedilu- vians, but, as would seem, the coming of the Lord Jesus to execute judgment upon the despisers of the gospel at the last day, Jude, ver. 14, 15. From the whole, therefore, it is evident that the apostle is not speaking- of the heathen creed founded merely on the light of reason, but of a be- lief of divine revelation. And, therefore, to ground the salvation of honest heathens who have no revelation, upon this text, is altooether absurd. We leave heathens to the Judge of all the earth, who certainly will do right ; but nothing can be more contrary to the drift of the apostle, than to suppose him telling the Hebrews, that men whose faith has no respect to revelation or the gospel, may obtain eternal life, which would make all he had said to them, in this epistle, of little consequence. Ver. 7. Bif faith Noah being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved zoith fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house/] Noah was (/,p7j//,5t7(