>l ' ■ i" / - ?• I-. . ' /•' , • . .'.•■■■ h ■'', ^- : .-■.• -.-.■' ...••'- r^* .-V 1^ ■,.:/' ^*a. y , , -_ ;'.w.;, >V ■ , »■ ■:.-'i; -•:)•■ ..^T^.v.-;' ,-'. ' ,' • rf. '• \ io- Y - • ■■■'"T V * • ••-■•-'.■. ■ ■■',• ■' ■ ■ 'tU^ :'%■'•'''' vr>'-,'-/:^''-.;' ■' .-;-■■■■•■ f ^' .'■ :i5'..>. :, •... •■;;.■■••' , r . WifXj^i ■•' '^ ^ •■,■•■ •■-•:'•; ♦' ■'' ^-^■', ^^IKP ^%'J'' ./^. >:"■;; i'^.:-!*: V ■^ FEB 25 1898 Oivisi»n.. -i4) Section.j.t ..'2 '4- No,_ / H people's (Tommentat^ ROMANS j^isriD I. AND II. CORmXHIANS A POPULAR COMMENTARY UPON A CRITICAL BASIS, ESPECIALLY DESIGNED FOR PASTORS AND SUNDAY SCHOOLS <$><$>'$>^'$><$><$><»'^ <$><$> ^<$> BY GEO. W. CLARK, D. D. Author of " A New Harmony of toe Gospels," and a " Harmony of toe Acts," etc. PHILADELPHIA AMERICAN BAPTIST PUBLICATION SOCIETY 1420 Chestnut Street 1897 Copyright 1897 by the American Baptist Publication Society jpcom tbe Socletie's own press PREFACE It is proposed to complete the work entitled "A People's Commentary" on the New Testament, by issuing four volumes on the Epistles and Revelation. Like the preceding volumes on the Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles, they will be popular commentaries on a critical basis, designed for that large class of Sunday-school workers and pastors who are unable, or have not the time, to con- sult original sources, and yet wish the best results of latest scholarship. To do this is a difficult task ; in selecting material from many sources, in deciding what to admit and what to reject, and what explanations are needed. A certain sim- plicity and fullness are required ; for what is plain to one may be obscure to another. But to keep the work within the limits proposed, a certain brevity is necessary. To meet these requirements the paraphrase is sometimes adopted, brief explanations are thrown in between words and clauses, and often a literal, a free, or a full rendering of a passage is given. Often brief sentences, quite independent of each other, are arranged together. In this volume four questions have been kept in view : What did the writer intend to express? What was the idea that he conveyed to the Christian readers whom he addressed ? AVhat did the Spirit intend to say through him ? How can the thought thus attained be best expressed now ? The grammatical form and logical connection of the original have been carefully studied throughout ; and it has been the endeavor to give the course of thought and the true meaning of every passage. This has been done, it is believed, in that devout and prayer- ful spirit which brings the mind into sympathy with the object and source of Divine truth. There is deep meaning and much truth in that old saying : " To have prayed well is to have studied well." Prayer fits for reverent study, and the sincere desire that accompanies prayer and the Spirit granted in ansAver to prayer, are adapted to clear the spiritual vision and prepare it to apprehend spiritual truth. The best helps, both earlier and later, have been sought and used. The author, however, is conscious of having come short of this high standard ; but he feels assured of having come nearer to it than he would if his aim had been lower. Four years ago the Publication Society authorized me to obtain any assist- ance I needed for the completion of this Commentary on the New Testament. I have been fortunate in securing the services of Rev. O. P. Eaches, D. D., whose scholarly instincts and habits, teaching ability and pastoral experience, spiritual insight and devotion to the truth, clearness and simplicity of style, fit him for the work. He has prepared the notes for the Epistles to the Hebrews, James, and Peter, which volume will follow this. If the Lord will, two additional vol- umes, one by Dr. Eaches, and one by myself, will complete the series. HlOHTSTOWN, N. J., 1897. INTRODUCTION THE EPISTLES IN GENERAL The Epistles and the Apocalypse supplement the four Gospels and the Acts, and complete the revelations regarding the divine scheme of salvation. In them we may discover the progressive manifestation of truth, and the last and fullest revelations of the Divine will. Addressed publicly to churches, or privately to individuals, or generally to Christians, they rescue from uncertain tradition the certain inspired teachings of the apostles. They deal with doctrinal and prac- tical questions pertaining to the nature of our Lord's kingdom, to his sufferings, death, and resurrection, to his calling of the Gentiles, and to his second coming and final glory. Twenty-two in number, they naturally fall into the three groups of Peter, Paul, and John. With the Gospels of Matthew and Mark as a basis, Peter, with James and Jude, presents the simplest and earliest form of Gospel apostolic teaching. Paul, building upon the foundation laid by Peter in the Jewish and Gentile world, writes more largely and develops more fully than the others the great doctrines of grace and redemption. With him must be associated the writings of Luke, the address of Stephen, and the Epistle to the Hebrews, as kindred in thought and doctrine. John, the profoundest yet most childlike of all, is remarkable for his spiritual contemplation of the heights and depths of the mysteries of godliness, and for the power with which he presents the mani- festation of the incarnate Word and the revelation of the glorified Son of Man. Peter has been aptly styled the apostle of hope ; Paul, the apostle of faith ; and John, the apostle of love. The addresses in the Acts are to those who are not Christians, except the debate in the council at Jerusalem and the charge to the elders at Miletus ; but the Epistles are addressed to Christians for their instruction in doctrine and their upbuilding in their inner and outer life. As an apostle of the circumcision and a witness of the resurrection, Peter appeals constantly to the Old Testament Scriptures, and makes prominent the earthly and heavenly life of our Lord. Paul, while using largely the law and prophets in illustrating and confirming the doctrines of salvation by grace, refers but little to the earthly life of our Lord, but makes prominent the risen and glorified Christ. John, starting with the eternal Logos as a fundamental and central fact, dwells upon him as the light and life of men, resulting in their spiritual fellowship with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ, and with one another. In practice Peter emphasizes re- pentance toward God ; Paul, faith in our Lord Jesus Christ ; and John, love to God and for our felloAv-men. These three great leaders of spiritual thought in the New Testament, while exhibiting diversity of gifts, manifest unity of spirit. V vi THE EPISTLES IN GENEKAL " They are unlike in regard to their point of departure and the method and depth of their teaching, but agree in their convictions in regard to faith in tlieir prin- ciples and expectations ; their color is varied, but not so the original light ; their tones change, but thereby the higher harmony is rather increased than disturbed. The Jewish Christian cast of thought of the one writer is by no means irrecon- cilably opposed to the more Grecian coloring of thought in the other ; and a continued investigation always leads to the discovery of a harmony even in those cases where it was before doubted, perhaps entirely overlooked" (Van Oos- terzee). Each wrote independently of the other, at difterent times and in diti'erent places, but without contradiction and with such unity of purpose and spirit and harmony of thought as to indicate the truth coming from Christ as a common source and that the writers themselves were under the guidance of the Holy Spirit. In the study of the Epistles we discover in the writers growth in grace and in the knowledge of the truth. It is best therefore to study them in the order in which they were written. After the Gospels and the Acts, first Peter, then Paul, then John. Chronological order should especially be observed in studying the writings of the Apostle Paul. During the thirteen years between his first and last Epistle, Paul evidently had deep experiences, rich revelations, and increas- ing insight into divine truth. His thirteen or perhaps fourteen Epistles should probably be arranged as follows : First and Second Thessalonians, Galatians, First and Second Corinthians, Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, Philippians, Philemon, First Timothy, Titus, and Second Timothy. Dr. Lightfoot places Philippians before Ephesians, and some would place Galatians after Second Corinthians. The Epistle to the Hebrews, whether written under the direction of Paul or not, may be profitably studied after the Epistle to the Romans. PAUL THE WRITER OF EPISTLES. If we would fully understand Paul we must know Paul. Born a Jew, and yet a Roman citizen (Acts 22 : 28), he was thus connected Avith the better and more influential of Jewish families. Spending his childhood at Tarsus, a city classed with Athens and Alexandria, the three forming the great centers of the world's learning, he must have known something of Grecian culture and felt its influence, while he was carefully trained by his devout parents according to the precepts and doctrines of the strictest Pharisees (2Tim. 1 :3; Phii. 3 : 5; Acts23 :6). Passing his youth and early manhood at Jerusalem under the great Gamaliel (Acts 22 : 3), and instructed in tlie law of the fathers, and again at Tarsus, both doubtless before and certainly after his conversion (Actss : 30; 11 : 25), he enjoyed the best advantages of his times. Of quick intellect and with great powers of ac- quisition (oai.i :i4), taught in Jewish Scriptures and .Jewish tradition and hav- ing the Greek perfectly at comniaiul, he was eminently fitted by nature, position, and education to meet and influence both Jews and Gentiles. Possessing a keen, logical mind with a strong, emotional nature, he Avas a man of clear and deep convictions, naturally following premise to conclusion ; before his conversion a zealot for God and the traditions of the fjithers (Acts 22 : 3; Gai. 1 : u), and after, consecrated absolutely to Christ and intensely devoted to his apostolic and mis- INTRODUCTION vii sionary work ; before, his whole soul bent in the line of Jewish narrowness ; after, toward all the objects of Christ's love, without distinction of race or nation. Paul's Epistles are in a sense parts of himself. We cannot read them to- day, after eighteen centuries, without still feeling the impulse he imparted to them. For (1) he wrote and spoke oat of his own experience. At his conversion Christ was revealed in him (Gai. i : i6) as the Saviour of the sinner, whether Jew or Gentile. The thought grew as a living reality until we find it in its highest development in the Epistles of the imprisonment, which have been aptly styled the " Christological Epistles." He had found the gospel to be the power of God unto salvation, and he knew the truth of its doctrines and the value of its pre- cepts from a rich experience. Two of his addresses in the Acts were accounts of his own conversion, and but a cursory reading of his Epistles will reveal how largely they were the transcripts and results of soul-struggles and soul- victories. (2) Connected with his experience were Divine revelations. These he had enjoyed in great abundance (2 Cor. 12 : 2-7) as well as the supernatural gifts of the Spirit (1 Cor. 14 : 18, 19). Many things he had received directly from the Lord, such as the manner of celebrating the Lord's Supper (i Cor. ii : 23) and the gospel which he preached (oai. 1 : 12). The hidden things connected with the redemption of the race had l)een made known to him. He had been so entrusted with these treas- ures, and so commissioned to proclaim them that he could speak of them as " my gospel " (Rom. 2 : 16 ; 16 : 25 ; 2 Tim. 2 : 8 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 1 ; Gal. 1 : 11 ; 2:2; 2 Thess. 2 : U). (3) Connected with his experience also was an intense love for souls. Abbott speaks of Paul as more a philanthropist than a philosopher. He was indeed a lover of men, but more a lover of the souls of men. And all this because of Christ, the Saviour and elder brother. For the Jews, his persecuting kinsmen, he poured forth his earnest prayers that they might be saved, and would even willingly have died in their behalf. To the Gentiles he devoted his life in labors incessant, not counting his life dear to himself; admonishing in tears, weeping over sinners, becoming all things to all men that he might gain some. (4) He was also however a philosopher, in that he was a lover of truth. Whatever was opposed to the truth he treated with the utmost abhorrence ( Gai. 1 : 8, 9 ; 2 : u). While uot giviug a systematic theology he gave the most systematic presentation of truth found in the New Testament. A Christian philosophy per- vades and gives color to all his writings. (5) And added to this was vehemence. Truth he often enforced with powerful logic ; but whether in argument or persuasion he drove in his points with ve- hemence. Thoughts often came forth in torrents, which would not always yield easily to the rules of grammar. With an object before him he pushed toward it with the fervor and energy of his whole being. And the more since (6) his Epistles are largely of the nature of oral discourse. Employing an amanuensis his Epistles were dictated for the most part and addressed as if speaking to his readers face to face. Often rising to the fervor of the most impassioned oratory, with richness of thought and feeling he plunged into irregular and complex sen- tences, or into a sudden and unexpected burst of eloquence, or some digression suggested by a word or a reminiscence. The Epistles of Paul need to be studied as combining the elements of written letters and oral addresses. THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS Paul has been universally regarded as the author of the Epistle to the Ro- mans. The Jewish Christian sects of old who opposed its distinctive doctrines admitted this, and the skeptical school of modern Germany has not assailed its Pauline authorship. The Epistle is found in the oldest manuscripts, which proves its existence before the fourth century. It is quoted by the early Christian writers as Paul's, among them by Eusebius of Csesarea in Palestine, about the end of the third century; by Tertullian, who lived Ijoth before and after a. d. 200 at Carthage in North Africa ; by Clement of Alexandria, who died there about A. D. 220 ; and by Origen, who lived in Egypt and Palestine (a. d. 186-254) and wrote a commentary on this Epistle, a translation of which in Latin has come dowm to us, Irenseus of Lyons, the latter part of the second century, fre- quently speaks of Paul as writing to the Romans. The Muratorian fragment, written before A. D. 170, gives a list of Paul's Epistles, among which is that to the Romans. Marcion of Sinope, the Gnostic, about the middle of the second cen- tury, includes this Epistle in his list of Paul's Epistles. Justin, early in the sec- ond century, appears to quote freely from Rom. 4 : 11, 12 {Dial. 23) ; and Clement of Rome, near the close of the first century, in his Epistle to the Corinthians (chap. 35) plainly summarizes Rom. 1 : ^7-32. He appears also to make some reference to 2 Peter 2:5; and Peter (2 Peter 3: 15, le) speaks of the letters of Paul. Some, however, during the past hundred years, while regarding the whole Epistle as Paul's, have thought the closinj» chapters (some the last five, others the last two) either mutilated, or misplaced. Their reasons are insufiicient and their views have met with but little fiivor. It has been suggested that the six- teenth chapter belonged to some epistle sent to Ephesus, or to some Asiatic church. The suggestion has been made because of the number of persons greeted, and especially because of the mention of Aquila and Priscilla, who had been recently at Ephesus, and of the church at their house. But Strabo ( XVI., 5) says that many Tarsians were at Rome and that Rome swarmed with Asiatics. Communication was easy and frequent between Ephesus, Corinth, and Rome. Aquila doubtless went to Rome either soon after the tumult at Ephesus ( Acts 20 : 1) , or possibly before, when Paul definitely purposed to visit Rome (Acts 19 : 21). There was abundance of time therefore for Aquila to have gone to Rome, arranged matters, and sent back word to Paul. He may have taken some of his helpers in liis business with him, who were Christians, and, having room in his establish- ment, may have commenced meetings at once and interested and gathered in other believers also. That Aquila and his wife were adapted to this kind of work, and successful, is evident from their instruction of Apollos ( Acts is : 26. See introductory remarks to chap. 15 ; and note on 16 : 3, 14). TO WHOM ADDRESSED. The Epistle is addressed " to all the beloved of God, called to be saints, that are in Rome." They are nowhere in the New Testament spoken of as a church, though there appear to have been several church assemblies in the city ( i6 : 5, u, i5) . It is very probable that there was no place sufficiently large at their com- INTRODUCTION ix mand, where the entire discipleship could conveniently meet. Rome is vari- ously estimated to have contained from one to two million inhabitants. The streets were generally narrow and crooked, and the tenement houses were built to a great height, and densely crowded. Nero decreed that dwelling-houses should not be more than seventy feet high. Under such surroundings but few believers, like Aquila, would have rooms for religious gatherings except very small ones. Such circumstances and the changing character of the population may have prevented them from having one central organization, and a great central meeting place. They seemed however to have moved in concert, and, if not in fact, they were really one body of Christian believers, with their several bishops or pastors (l : S ; 16 : 17. see note ou 16 : 5, 16) . The composition of the Christian congregation at Romejhas been much dis- cussed. It is evident from the Epistle that it comprised both Jewish and Gentile elements. The former is implied in the appeal of 2 : 17, but the general tone of the Epistle (i : i3 ; ii : is ; 15 : 15, 16) implies a majority of the latter. The number of Jews at Rome in the apostolic age, has been variously estimated at from twenty to sixty thousand. They lived in their own quarter beyond the Tiber, and had at least seven synagogues. That but few Jews were Christians, who kept themselves mostly separate from the others, seems evident from Acts 28 : 17-22. It was doubtless the best policy for them to ignore Christianity as much as possible ( Acts 28 : 22), But there was also a large number of proselytes, and especially of devout Gentiles like Cornelius at Rome and elsewhere. This is the testimony of Josephus and the historians of that day. These pious Gentiles accepted and studied the law of Moses and practised many of its precepts. From this class most of the early Gentile converts were drawn. They were prepared to appreciate Paul's quotations and arguments from the Old Testament Scrip- tures and to receive the doctrines he taught. It would seem that the Christians at Rome had not been subjected to such Judaizing influences as had those in Galatia, nor had serious error grown up among them. What they had taught met with his general approval (1 : 8; 6 : i7; 15 : 14), and their views were so far accord- ant with his own, that they were well prepared to receive and profit by the great doctrines of this Epistle. Their type of Christianity appears to have been not widely different from that proclaimed by Paul himself. The origin of Christianity at Rome is unknown. It must have existed there some time before this Epistle was written. Its adherents there had already be- come famous everywhere. This however is accounted for in part by the fact that from every place there was a road to Rome. Some of these believers also had been long in the faith (16 : 7), That Paul should have addressed his most sys- tematic and longest letter to them indicates growth, standing, intellectual and spiritual attainments in his readers — not only of the leaders but also of the better part of the brethren at large. An unreliable tradition makes Peter the founder of the church in a. d. 42 and continuing as its bishop for twenty-five years till his martyrdom. But every known evidence is against such a supposition. It finds no support in this Epistle, indeed it is excluded by Paul's principle of not building on another man's foundation ( is : 20) . The Acts proves that Peter was at Jerusalem in a. d. 44 (Acts 12) and in about a. D. 50 (Acts 15), and at Antioch about THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS A. D. 54 (Gal. 2 : 11). There is no mention of Peter's labors at Rome in the Acts or in any of the Epistles. He was probably in Babylon in Chaldea, in A. D. 66 (iPeter5:i3). Paul makcs uo mention of Peter, nor implies his presence at Rome either in this or in any of his Epistles. He would not have w ritten as he did, nor passed over his name in silence, if Peter had founded the church at Rome or if he had been the pastor or bishop of the church. Of all places Rome was the most likely to have the gospel take root without apostolic help. Its close connection with all parts of the empire would bring its inhabitants, both Jews and Gentiles, into contact with the gospel. Converts would come to so- journ there. Some of the sojourners from Rome, both Jews and proselytes (Acts 2 : 10), who witiiessc'd the outpouring of the Spirit at Pentecost, doubtless re- turned, bringing the gospel with them. Thus doubtless the seed was first carried to Rome ; and so it would continue to be by pilgrims returning from the feasts, and by converts in the leading cities where the gospel was successfully preached. The language of the saints at Rome appears to have been principally Greek. The Jews were Hellenists, or foreign Jews who spoke that language. The names mentioned in the sixteenth chapter of the Epistle are mostly of Greek origin. A very large proportion of the population of Rome was from the Greek-speaking provinces. The most enterprising, intelligent, and energetic of the middle classes and common people were Greek. From these the Christian converts would most likely be gathered. The early Christian literature of the Roman church was Greek. The first Latin version of the Bible was not made for Rome, but for North Africa and the provinces. The Epistle to the Romans would naturally be written in Greek, both because it was more familiar to Paul, and because it would be more generally understood by believers at Rome and to a large extent in Italy. WHEN AND WHERE WRITTEN. This Epistle was written in anticipation of Paul's going to Rome (i5 : 28) by way of Jerusalem. He purposed this visit at Ephesus in the spring of a. d. 57 (Acts 19 : 21) ; but he Spent a year in Ephesus, Macedonia, and Greece, before leav- ing the last-named for Jerusalem (Acts 20:5) in the spring of A. D. 58. The Epistle therefore must have been written between these two dates. So long and systematic an Epistie may have been prepared from time to time. But when it was completed he had done his work in Macedonia and the East (is -. 19, 23) , and he was about to leave Greece, where he had spent three months, for Jerusalem (15 : 25), Phoebe, the bearer of the Epistle, was of Cenchrtea, the eastern port of Corinth (i6:i) ; Gains, who was Paul's host, appears to have been of Corinth (16 : 23: 1 Cor. 1 : u). The phrasc " the city " (16 : 23), where Paul was, points also to Corinth as the capital. It seems evident therefore that Paul completed this Epistle and sent it from Corinth in the spring of A. D. 58. OCCASION AND DESIGN OF THE EPISTLE. Paul had long desired to visit Rome, but had l)een hindered from so doing. As his third missionary tour was nearing its close, he formed the design of visit- ing Spain, taking Rome on his way. With a view to this he probably sent Aquila and Priscilla to Rome to open a business and prepare an abode for him. INTRODUCTION xi Still later Phcebe, a deaconess of Cenchraea, was going to Rome. He also knew a goodly number there ; and his expected visit would be short. All these cir- cumstances gave him an occasion for writing this Epistle and an opportunity of sending it ahead as a forerunner of himself. Rome was the metropolis of the world, where were found, as residents and visitors, the representatives of all nations. Through the Christians at Rome Paul could reach a greater variety and larger number of peoples than in any other city. He therefore presents the gospel which he preached in a more ex- tended and systematic way than he had done in any other writing. His gospel was cosmopolitan, and Rome the most cosmopolitan of cities was the place in which to unfold it. He presents salvation through Christ alone adapted to the whole human race, to both Jews and Gentiles, a salvation solely through grace and by faith, in harmony with God's declaration and conduct as recorded in the Old Testament, and applicable to the inner and outer life of the Christian, as a mem- ber of a church and of the kingdom and a citizen of the world. Very likely the apostle desired to anticipate any possible error by presenting the truth, and to guard them against the assaults of- Judaizing teachers. Very likely also he would fortify them in some instructions which he had but recently found very needful at Corinth (i Cor. 8 : i sf. ; 12 : iff.). Doubtless he wished to comfort and confirm the disciples at Rome (1 : u. 12) ^ but he evidently had a wider and more general design. CONTENTS AND ANALYSIS. This Epistle is Paul's masterpiece, and the fullest presentation of his the- ology. It is an advance upon the Epistle to the Galatians, deeper and broader. In that the contrast is between Moses and Christ ; in this between Adam and Christ. That has special reference to Judaism ; this deals more with the race. The errors and the evils he combats in this are such as he had found every- where, and which would naturally be expected to exist to some extent in Rome. Very probably the discussions in this Epistle were largely anticipatory and pre- ventive. Thus he meets the points of controversy with Judaizers logically and systematically and in a conciliatory manner, fitted to disarm prejudice and obtain the fiivor of the Jewish element among Christians. As Rome was the seat of justice for the whole world Paul naturally presented the gospel in rela- tion to law and righteousness. He also deals with the bearing of the gospel on the Jewish people and upon the Gentile world, presenting an interesting lesson on the philosophy of history (11 : 32). Briefly and generally the Epistle may be divided into six parts : I. The in- troduction, in which is presented God's righteousness and salvation by faith alone, the leading thought of the Epistle (1 : i-n). II. The ruin and guilt of the whole human race (1 •• is-s : 20). HI. The remedy provided by God in the gospel for the justification, sanctification, and complete salvation of believers in Jesus (3 : 21-8 : 39). IV. A vindication of God's dealing with the Jews and the Gentiles (9 : 1-11 : 36). V. Practical and ethical lessons regarding the inner and outer life, among Christians and in the world (12 : 1-15 : 13). VI. Personal and concluding matters (15 : 14-16 : 27). xii THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS A FULLER ANALYSIS. I. Introduction. 1. Salutation to saints at Eome, 1 : 1-7. 2. Paul's long-cherished desire to preach to them, 1 : 8-15. 3. The Theme : The gospel God^s power to save all tvho believe, 1 : 16, 17. II. The ruin and guilt of the whole race, 1 : 18-3 : 20. Hence the necessity of a salvation and righteousness such as the gospel reveals. 1. God's wrath against the sins of men, 1 : 18. 2. The downfall and degradation of mankind, 1 : 19-23. 3. Judicially given over to a reprobate mind, 1 : 24-32. 4. The self-righteous and censorious self-condemned, 2 : 1-16. 5. The Jew fails to keep God's law, 2 : 17-24. 6. Circumcision cannot save him, 2 : 25-29. 7. Yet the Jews have a certain advantage, 3 : 1-8. 8. But they and Gentiles are both condemned by the law, 3 : 9-18. 9. Hence all men are sinners and condemned, 3 : 19, 20. III. The remedy : righteousness and salvation alone through faith IN Christ, 3 : 21-8 : 39. Justification. 1. Its nature : gratuitous, 3 : 21-24. 2. Its ground : the redemption and sacrifice of Christ, 3 : 25. 3. Its object : to enable a righteous God to save sinners, 3 : 26. 4. Its results: exclude boasting, etc., 3 : 27-31. 5. Illustrated and confirmed from the Old Testament, 4 : 1-25. 6. Results of justification upon the individual, 5 : 1-11. 7. Results upon the race, 5 : 12-21. Sanctification. 1. In Christ's death the believer died to sin, 6 : 1, 2. 2. Illustrated by his baptism, 6 : 3-11. 3. Let him not serve sin any more, 6 : 12-14. 4. A servant of righteousness constrained to loving obedience, 6 : 15-23. 5. The new life illustrated from .Jewish law, 7 : 1-6. 6. Sinful passions excited by the holy restraints of the law, 7:5. 7. Yet the laW is not evil but holy, 7 : 7, 12. 8. Illustrated by his experience before conversion, 7 : 7-12. 9. The evil not in the law but in man, 7 : 13. 10. Illustrated in experience both before and after conversion, 7 : 13-25. 11. Justified, and having a new life in Christ, no condemnation, 8:1,2. 12. Grace has accomplished what the law could not, 8 : 3, 4. 13. A changed nature insures a changed life, 8 : 5-8. 14. The Spirit dwelling in and actuating believers, 8 : 9-13. 15. The sons of God with the spirit of sonship, 8 : 14-17. 16. Grounds of encouragement in the midst of suffering, 8 : 18-30. 17. Final issue assured, complete salvation, 8 : 31-39. INTRODUCTION xiii IV. Vindication of God's dealings with Jews and Gentiles, 9 : i-ll : 36. The problem in respect to the passing over of Israel and the calling of the Gentiles. 1. Paul's interest and deep sorrow for Israel, 9 : 1-5. 2. Yet God's promise had not failed, 9 : 6-13. 3. No unrighteousness with God, 9 : 14-18. 4. God's justice and mercy displayed, 9 : 19-24. 5. According to prophecy, 9 : 20-29. 6. How Israel failed and Gentiles succeeded, 9 : 30-33. 7. Israel savable, yet unsaved. Why ? 10 : 1-4. 8. The gospel adapted and designed for all, 10 : 5-13. 9. The gospel should be preached to all, 10 : 14-21. 10. God has not wholly passed over his people, 11 : 1-10. 11. Israel's fall not final ; an occasion of salvation to the Gentiles, 11 : 11-16. 12. Gentiles should be humble, reverent, and grateful, 11 : 17-24. 13. Gentiles gathered in, and Israel restored, 11 : 25-32. 14. Praise to God at this sublime mystery, 11 : 33-35. End of the doctrinal portion of the Epistle. V. Practical and ethical lessons, 12 : 1-15 : 13. 1. A consecrated body and a renewed mind, 12 : 1, 2. 2. The right use of spiritual gifts, 12 : 3-8. 3. Duties to one another, 12 : 9-13. 4. Duties to the world, 12 : 14-21. 5. Subjection to rightful civil authority, 13 : 1-5. 6. Faithful attention to civil duties, 13 : 6-10. 7. Motives: brevity of life; approaching salvation, 13 : 11-14. 8. Conduct toward weak and overscrupulous brethren, 14 : 1-12. 9. A stumbling-block should not be put in the way of the weak, 14 : 13-18. 10. Should exercise self-sacrifice for the weak, 14 : 19-23. 11. Enforced by the example of Christ, 15 : 1-13. VI. Personal and concluding matters, 15 : 14-16 : 27. 1. Paul's apostolic labors among the Gentiles, 15 : 14-21. 2. Plans for the future, 15 : 22-24. 3. Present plans and work, 15 : 25-29. 4. Entreats their prayers. A benediction, 15 : 30-33. 5. Concluding words. Phoebe commended, 16 : 1, 2. 6. Salutations of Paul, 16 : 3-16. 7. Warnings against false teachers and divisions, 16 : 17-20. 8. Salutations from Paul's companions, and others, 16 : 21-24. 9. Doxology, 16 : 25-27. THE p:pistlp:s to the Corinthians No Epistles of the New Testament have come down to us better attested than the two to the Corinthians. They bear the evident marks of the times in which they were written, of the state of the Corinthian church, and of the char- acter of Paul as the writer. Clement of Rome, quite generally regarded as a friend and companion of Paul (Phii. 4:3), wrote his first Epistle to the Corinthians about A. D. 97, in which (chap. 47) he refers to Paul's first Epistle to them. And Polycarp, a disciple of John, and perhaps pastor of the church at Smyrna when John wrote the Revelation (Rev. 2:8), in his Epistle to the Philippians (chap. 11) about A. D. 116, quotes 1 Cor. 6 : 2 as the words of Paul. So also, about the same time, in the shorter Greek Epistles of Ignatius, who was pastor of the church at Antioch, there are several quotations from the same Epistle. Irenseus, a disciple of Polycarp, Athenagoras of Athens, Clement of Alexandria, and Tertullian of Carthage, all belonging to the second century, give their testimony to both the First and the Second Epistle to the Corinthians, as those of Paul. From that time oiiAvard they have been unhesitatingly accepted as the genuine writings of the apostle. The genuineness of these Epistles is confirmed by the undesigned coinci- dences between them and the Acts of the Apostles. These have been exhaust- ively treated by Paley in his " Horce Pmilince," and they are brought to view in the author's " Harmonic Arrangement of the Acts." (See g§ 26, 27, 30, 31, 34, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 49, and notes.) They form decisive arguments for the genu- ineness and truthfulness of these books of Scripture. A reference may here be made to some of them : Paul at Corinth before Apollos, 1 Cor. 1 : 12 ; 3:6; Acts 18 : 27, 28. Paul's baptism of Crispus, 1 Cor. 1 : 14 ; Acts 18 : 8. Paul's laboring with his own hands, 1 Cor. 4 : 12 ; Acts 18 : 3. Paul's sending Timothy to Corinth, 1 Cor. 4 : 17 ; Acts 19 : 22. To the Jews becoming as a Jew, 1 Cor. 9 : 20 ; Acts 16 : 3 ; 21 : 23-26. The churches of Galatia, 1 Cor. 16 : 1 ; Acts 18 : 23 ; 19 : 1. Paul's going to Macedonia, 2 Cor. 1 : 15, 16 ; 9 : 2, 4 ; Acts 20 : 1, Brethren coming from Macedonia, 2 Cor. 11 : 9 ; Acts 18 : 5. Silas, or Silvanus and Timothy, 2 Cor. 1 : 19 ; Acts 18 : 5. Paul stoned once, 2 Cor. 11 : 25 ; Acts 14 : 19. Letters of commendation, 2 Cor. 3:1; Acts 18 : 27. Paul's escape from Damascus, 2 Cor. 11 : 32, 33 ; Acts 9 : 23-25. In these and many other passages the variations and agreements are so marked, without contradiction, as to stamp them as genuine writings of the times and the truthful exhibitions of matters as they then existed. TO WHOM ADDRESSED. Both Epistles are addressed to " The Church of God which is at Corinth." It was in a. d. 52 that Paul, on his second missionary journey, first visited Corinth. There he continued for eighteen months, then three months (Acts is : ii. is) xiv INTRODUCTION xv with perhaps a short visit to Athens between (2Cor. i2:U: i3:i). He gathered many disciples, some of them being Jews (Acts is : 8), but the majority being Gen- tiles of Greek and Koman descent (icor. 12:2). They were mostly from the poorer classes (1 Cor. 1 : 26) and of slender intellectual attainments, but Crispus, the ruler of the synagogue (Acts is : 8), Erastus, the chamberlain of the city (Rom. 16:23), and Gaius, Paul's host, formed exceptions. After Paul left them they were ministered to by ApoUos and others. Factions arose in the church and questions upon Christian morality and doctrine, which are discussed in these Epistles. The subsequent history of the church is brought to view by the letter of Clement, pastor at Kome (about a. d. 97. See above). It was addressed to this church, and indicates that after a period of harmony the church had been again divided into factions by ambitious leaders. A copy of the Epistle is found in the Alexandrine manuscript of the New Testament. Hegesippus, an ecclesi- astical writer about the middle of the second century, speaks of the church of Corinth as having kept the true faith ; and Dionysius, a most noted pastor at Corinth (about a. d. 170), in one of his letters, speaks of their Lord's Day's observances. It would seem that for a long time the church maintained apos- tolic doctrines, and usually enjoyed a good degree of prosperity. CORINTH. Some knowledge of the city of Corinth will help us to understand better the church there and these Epistles. It was not the ancient Greek Corinth which Paul visited. That had been taken and destroyed by L. Mummius, a Eoman consul, B. C. 146. For one hundred years it lay in total ruin, till Julius Csesar, B. C. 46, rebuilt it and colonized it largely with veterans and Roman freedmen. Standing on the isthmus with two harbors, Cenchreae, the eastern, about nine miles distant, and Lechseum, the western, only a mile and a-half distant, it in- vited the commerce both from the East and the West. It soon regained more than its ancient opulence and was the metropolis of Achaia, embracing Southern and Central Greece. The Roman proconsul of Achaia fixed his seat there (Acts 18 : i2)j the city having a population of from four to five hundred thousand. Jews were drawn thither by its merchandise, and Greeks by its ancient reputa- tion and the glory of its Isthmian games. Its marts were filled with objects of luxury, and visited by every nation of the civilized world. The worship of Venus, which had given Corinth an infamous pre-eminence, was restored, and a thousand priestesses were dedicated to its licentious and shameful worship. The very name of Corinthian was synonymous with profligacy. A declining Greek philos- ophy prevailed among the Greeks and wealthier classes, and more or less affected the mass of the people. It was with such difiiculties that Paul, his associates, and the disciples gathered there, had to contend. In these Epistles we find in- dications of a general looseness of manners and morals (1 Cor. 5 : 11 : 6 : 9-11), a denial of a future life and the making of this life one of unlimited enjoyment (1 Cor. 15 : 32), rivalries and personal vanity (1 Cor. 4 : 6, 7 ; 5:6; 2 cor. 11 : 12), and a worldly phi- losophy and strife of words (1 Cor. 1 : 17 ; 2 : is ; 2 Cor. 12 : 20). THE FIRST EPISTLE Apollos had returned from Corinth to Ephesus (i Cor. i6 : 12). The church had degenerated, and some had fallen into immoral practices. Paul had "svritten them a letter, charging them not to keep company with fornicators (icor. 5:8), Judaizing teachers came to Corinth (2 cor. 11 : 22)^ who brought letters of recom- mendation from other churches (2Cor. 3:i) and who opposed the authority and teaching of Paul. This led to unduly extolling and following different religious leaders (1 Cor. 1 : 12). Some were carrying their views of Christian liberty so far as to tolerate notorious immorality (icor. 5:i), and to attend idolatrous feasts (1 Cor. 8 : 10). Others were going to laM' against their brethren in heathen courts (1 Cor. 6:6). Christian women, transgressing the customary rules of modesty, were casting aside their veils in the public congregation (1 cor. 11 : 5). The Lord's Supper was degenerating into a common and disorderly meal (1 Cor. 11 : is, 19). Be- sides all this, spiritual gifts had been shamefully misused, and had become occa- sions of envy and strife. Doubtless under the influence of heathen philosophy and perhaps Sadducean influence, the doctrine of the resurrection had been denied or questioned by some (1 Cor. i5: 12). There were, however, many members of the church of sincere piety and exemplary lives, whom the apostle could con- scientiously commend (1 Cor. 1 : 4-9). Certain brethren had come to him, who had been a source of great comfort to him ( 1 cor. le : it, is) , Deeply solicitous for the church Paul sent Timothy with instructions to pro- ceed to Corinth after transacting some necessary business in Macedonia. Soon after this he received a letter from Corinth asking questions on certain subjects discussed there, without referring to the disorders among them (1 Cor. 7 : 1). From others however he heard of the factions in the church and of immoral excesses (1 Cor. 1 : 11; 5 : 1). As he could not leave Ephesus at that time (1 Cor. le : 9), he at once sends Titus and a brother not named, very probably in charge of this Epistle which these circumstances of the church had called forth (2 cor. 2 : i3; 8 : 6, le-is, 22, 23; 12:18). His design in writing was to restore harmony in the church, to correct errors of doctrine and practice, to vindicate his authority as an apostle, and the character and style of his preaching from the attacks of his enemies, and to con- firm the Christians of Corinth and Greece in their allegiance to Christ. He would have them realize the true ideas as a church and as Christians. TIME AND PLACE OF WRITING. Paul wrote the First Epistl^to the Corinthians from Epnesus (le : 8, 19) a little time before Pentecost, shortly after sending Timothy to Corinth by way of Macedonia (16 : 10, 11). A considerable interval must have elapsed since his min- istry at Corinth ; for Apollos had labored there (3:6; Acts 19 : 1) and had returned to Ephesus (16:12) ; divisions and disorders had grown up in the church; and Paul had written a pre%nous letter which now is lost (5:9), All this would lead us to put this letter near the close of Paul's ministry at Ephesus, Now from Acts 19 : 21, 22, we learn that near the end of his stay at Ephesus he was propos- ing to visit Macedonia and Greece, and he sent on before Timothy and Erastus xvi INTRODUCTION xvii into Macedonia. He was in Ephesus from a. d. 54 to 57. From all this it appears that he wrote this Epistle at Ephesus, probably in the spring of a. d. 57. FEATURES OF THE EPISTLE. In the Epistle to the Eomans doctrine predominates ; in those to the Corin- thians the practical prevails. Peculiar circumstances of a church in a pagan city called them forth. Did we not have these Epistles we should know far less than we do of apostolic churches in general, and of Gentile churches in particu- lar ; of their struggles and temptations, of the trials of apostolic missionaries and the difficulties of their work. The first Epistle brings more especially to view the church and its relations ; the second brings into prominence Paul as an individual. But both present different sides of the church at Corinth, and also most remarkable characteristics of the apostle. The wisdom and shrewd common sense of Paul are marked in the first Epistle. It is applied Christianity in practical matters and to ordinary life. At the same time no Epistle presents better specimens of sublime thought or eloquent language. How he speaks of the wisdom of God and the foolishness of men (i:20f.) ; of the ministers of Christ (4: If.); and of the shortness of time (7:29f.). How magnificent his panegyric on love (chap, is)^ and how unsurpassed in force of argument and happy illustration his defense and development of the doctrine of the resurrec- tion. Paul appears as the settler of great principles and the preacher of great doctrines, the guide, the instructor, and the counselor of churches. CONTENTS. In the first six chapters Paul speaks of the divisions and disorders of the church at Corinth ; and from the beginning of the seventh chapter on he answers the series of questions which the church had sent him. The following analysis is given. FiEST Part.— Divisions and disorders in the church at Corinth, 1:1-6: 20. I. Salutation and thanksgiving, 1 : 1-9. II. Divisions from party spirit, 1 : 10-4 : 21. 1. Exhortation to unity, and a statement of their divisions, 1 : 10-12. 2. Paul disclaims his own headship of the Christian system, 1 : 13-17. 3. The preaching of the Cross abasing to pride, 1 : 18-23. 4. But it is the power and wisdom of God, 1 : 24, 25. 5. Illustrated in the Corinthian converts, 1 : 26-31. 6. Paul preached not himself but Christ crucified, 2 : 1-5. 7. Held up as the wisdom of God, 2 : 6-9. 8. Eevealed by God's Spirit, 2 : 10-13. 9. Must be spiritually received, 2 : 14-16. 10. But their party spirit proved their carnal-minded ness, 3 : 1-4. 11. Christian ministers only workmen ; God the master, 3 : 5-9. 12. They must build on Christ, the only foundation, 3 : 10-15. 13. Their danger and responsibility, 3 : 16, 17. 14. Must renounce human wisdom, that they may be wise, 3 : 18-20. 15. Therefore they must not glory in men, 3 : 21-23. B xviii THE FIRST EPISTLE 16. Paul and Apollos servants and stewards, 4 : 1-4. 17. Accountable to God and judged by him, 4 : 5. 18. Let there be no strife about teachers, 4 : 6-8. 19. The Corinthian arrogance and their self-denying labors contrasted, 4 : 9-13. 20. Paul speaks with apostolic authority, 4 : 14-21. III. Moral disorders in the Corinthian church, 5 : 1-6 : 20. 1. Case of incest. Failure of discipline, 5 : 1-8. 2. Directions of a previous letter, 5 : 9-11. 3. The oflfender to be expelled, 5 : 12, 13. 4. Lawsuits at heathen tribunals, 6 : 1-7. 5. The inconsistency of such conduct, 6 : 8-11. 6. Fornication not a matter of indifference, 6 : 12-14. 7. A sin against their own body, which belongs to Christ, and the temple of the Spirit, 6 : 15-18. 8. A redeemed body should be used to God's glory, 6 : 19, 20. Second Part. — Answers to certain questions asked in a letter from Corinth. I. In regard to marriage, divorce, and celibacy, 7 : 1-40. 1. Advice as to marriage and celibacy, 7 : 1-7. 2. General advice to the unmarried, 7 : 8, 9. 3. General advice as to divorce, 7 : 10, 11. 4. As to the separation of married persons, 7 : 12-16. 5. Generally, let each one abide in his calling, 7 : 17-24. 6. Kegarding marriage" under present circumstances, especially of maiden daughters, 7 : 25-34. 7. Duty of parents to unmarried daughters, 7 : 35-38. 8. The duty of widows, 7 : 39, 40. II. Concerning things offered in sacrifice to idols, 8 : 1-11 : 1. 1. To be settled by love rather than V>y knowledge, 8 : 1-3. 2. Really a matter of indifference, 8 : 4-6. 3. But all not enlightened in regard to this, 8 : 7. 4. Sin against a brother's conscience a sin against Christ, 8 : 8-12. 5. Paul's principle of abstinence for the sake of others, 8 : 13. 6. Illustrated by his own conduct. (a) Foregoing his rights as an apostle for others' good, 9 : 1-12. (b) His freedom and self-denial, 9 : 13-23. 7. Self-restraint needful for their own safety, 9 : 24-27. 8. Want of self-restraint was fatal to their highly favored fathers, 10 : 1-10. 9. An example and warning to Christians, 10 : 11-13. 10. Fellowship cannot exist with both Christ and demons, 10 : 14-22. 11. Consideration for others our rule of action, 10 : 23-30. 12. Seek God's glory and our neighbor's good, 10 : 31-11 : 1. III. Concerning public worship, 11 : 2-34. 1. The conduct and dress of women in public services, 11 : 2-16. (a) Praising the Corinthians for observing his instructions, 11 : 2. (b) Women veiled in public worship, 11 : 3-6. (c) Because of her relation to man, 11 : 7-12. INTRODUCTION xix (d) From a sense of natural fitness, 11 : 13-15. (e) From the custom of the churches, 11 : 16. 2. Disorders at the Lord's Supper, and its proper observance, 11 : 17-34. (a) Their abuse of the Lord's Supper, 11 : 17-22. (b) History, nature, and purpose of the Lord's Supper, 11 : 23-26. (c) Manner in which it should be observed, 11 : 27-34. IV. Concerning exercises of spiritual gifts, 12 : 1-14 : 40. 1. How to discern their nature, 12 : 1-3. 2. Unity and diversity of spiritual gifts, 12 : 4-11. 3. Illustrated by the human body, 12 : 12-26. (a) Many members in one body, 12 : 12-14. (b) None to be overrated or despised, 12 : 15-26. 4. Application of these principles, 12 : 27-31. 5. The superiority of love, 13 : 1-13. (a) Love pre-eminently essential to religion, 13 : 1-3. (b) Characteristics of love, 13 : 4-7. (e) Permanence of love, 13 : 8-12. (d) Pre-eminence of love, 13 : 13. 6. Prophecy superior to gift of tongues, 14 : 1-25. (a) Prophecy a means of edification, 14 : 1-5. (b) Unknown tongues not understood, 14 : 6-9. (c) If not understood they tend to confusion, 14 : 10-19. (d) They are a sign to unbelievers, 14 : 20-22. (e) Prophecy especially for believers, 14 : 22-25. 7. Directions to insure decency and order, 14 : 26-40. (a) Rules for the use of tongues and prophecy, 14 : 26-33. (b) As to the public ministrations of women, 14 : 34-36. (c) Exhortation to obedience and order, 14 : 36-40. V. Concerning the resurrection of the dead, 15 : 11-58. 1. Christ's resurrection a primal theme of Paul's preaching, 15 : 1-4. 2. The fact of Christ's resurrection established, 15 : 5-11. 3. Christ's resurrection implies a general resurrection, 15 : 12-19. 4. The resurrection essential to the scheme of redemption, 15 : 20-28. 5. Argument from the lives of believers, 15 : 29-34. 6. Manner of the resurrection, 15 : 35-49. 7. Result of the resurrection, 15 : 50-58. VI. Concerning collections. Sundry matters, 16 : 1-24. 1. Directions about the collection, 16 : 1-4, 2. Paul's proposed visit to them, 16 : 5-9. 3. Regarding Timothy, Apollos, and others, 16 : 10-18. 4. Salutations, warning, and benediction, 16 : 19-24. THE SECOND EPISTLE TIME, PLACE, OCCASION, AND OBJECT This Epistle is addressed to the church of God at Corinth, and to "all the saints which are in all Achaia." It was therefore a matter of interest to the churches throughout Greece, including that of Athens, and it impliedly met a want in them. With Paul was associated Timothy (2 Cor. 2 : i)^ whom he had sent from Ephesus into Macedonia and Achaia to prepare for his coming (Acts 19 21, 22 : 1 Cor. 16 : 10). After this Paul left Ephesus and went to Troas and into Macedonia, where he wrote this Epistle (Acts 20 : 1 ; 2 Coi. 2 : 12, 13 ; s ; 1 ; 9 : 2, -t), Titus, who also had been sent to Corinth, returned bringing favorable tidings regarding the state of the church (2 Cor. 7 : 6 ; 8 : le, 23). After sending this Epistle Paul visited Corinth and spent the winter of A. D. 58 there (2 Cor. 13 : i; Acts 20 : 3, 4; Row. 15 : 19, 23, 26). From all this it appears that Paul wrote this letter in the autumn of a. d. 57. The plcLC^ where he wrote it cannot be so definitely determined. It has been common to fix it at Philippi ; but Paul speaks of the liberality of the churches of Macedonia (2 Cor. 8 : i; 9 : 2) as though he had visited more than one of them, whereas Philippi would be the first in his way from Troas (Acts le : 11, 12). An examination of the Epistle indicates a change of feeling and tone with the be- ginning of the seventh chapter. The first six chapters imply that Paul had learned some things favoral)le from Corinth, but that he was left in a state of some uncer- tainty and anxiety regarding their condition. The remaining chapters indicate a fuller and more favorable report of the church, and a clearer view of the oppo- sition of his opponents. He is filled with greater joy and greater boldness in defending his apostolic authority, and answering taunts and accusations against himself. May we not then suppose that upon coming to Philippi he met with Timothy, who had returned from a brief visit to Corinth (1 Cor. 4 : n ; 16 : 10, 11), and who informed him of the exclusion and repentance of the incestuous person, as well as of some other matters in the church. Paul at once begins his letter, and after writing the first six chapters passes on to Thessalonica, where he meets Titus returning from a longer mission to Corinth, who gives him a full account of the church there. He is filled with joy, and he sees just what is needed to complete the work already going on at Corinth. From the fullness of his heart he completes the Epistle and sends it at once, perhaps by Titus (2 Cor. a : 23, 24), preparatory to his speedily following himself. If this theory is correct then the Epistle was begun at Pliilippi and finished at Thessalonica. It should be noted also tliat the situation as to parties in tlie church had changed since his writing the first Epistle. Then there were four parties, though his own followers and those of Apollos appear to receive his principal attention. Now in the second Epistle his bitter opposers seem to center in the Christ-party, who made light of his apostolic authority, some of whom claimed a special relationship to Jesus, and very probably were Jews who had seen Christ in the flesh (2 Cor. 10 : 7: 11 . 23). These largely made this Epistle necessary. Paul's object in writing this Epistle seems to have been to develop in be- lievers at Corinth a proper state of mind ; to promote in them the reformation XX INTRODUCTION xxi already begun ; to guard them against the influences of false teachers, and thus render severity unnecessary on his part, when he should come to them. His own language is, "This also we pray for, even your perfection. For this cause I write these things while absent, that when present I may not deal sharply according to the authority Avhich the Lord gave me for building up, and not casting down " (2 Cor. 13 : 9, 10). It was intended to prepare the way for the visit which he was soon to make them. ITS CHARACTERISTICS. This Epistle was evidently written in haste. Hence it is the least methodical of all of Paul's Epistles. It is the outpouring of a soul filled with afiection, burdened with anxiety, schooled in afilietion, and terribly in earnest. It is dis- tinguished by its variety of gentleness and severity, calmness and vehemence, earnestness and irony. Nowhere do we see so much of Paul as an individual and as an apostolic missionary. He lays open his heart, discovers to us his soul- struggles, and the inner and outer conflicts in his planting and training of the churches. At the same time we get an inner view of the Corinthian church, with its praiseworthy characteristics and its glaring defects, and having a member- ship with different attitudes toward himself. How wisely he addresses different classes and how skillfully he anticipates argument and meets objections. How is the whole interspersed with the most delicate touches of thought and the sub- limest eloquence. " Now he boils up," says Erasmus, " like a limpid spring, sud- denly he rolls away with a great noise like a mighty torrent bearing all before it, and then he flows gently along, or expands like a placid lake over all the land." SPECIAL PRACTICAL USES. The two Epistles to the Corinthians were pre-eminently tracts for the times ; yet they are suited, in a greater or less degree, to churches and believers of every age. 1. As to ch urches. The word church occurs more frequently in these Epistles than elsewhere in the New Testament. It is generally applied to the local church (1 Cor. 4 : 17 ; 2 Cor. 11 : 8, etc.), though it is also applied to the collective membership everywhere (i cor. 12 : 28; i Cor. 15 : 9). It is styled " the church of God," bringing into view its high position (1 Cor. 1 : 1 : 2 cor. 1 : 1). It is the dwelling-place of the Spirit (1 Cor. 3 : 16) ; a cultivated field (1 cor. 3 : 9) ; a building, a temple (1 Cor. 3 : 11-n). Baptism, as related to Christ, is implied in 1 Cor. 10 : 1 ff". The institution and administration of the Lord's Supper in the church is given more fully than elsewhere in 1 Cor. 11 : 23-29. Ordinary and extraordinary gifts have their fullest presentation in chapters 12, 13, and 14 of 1 Corinthians. Church dis- cipline is noted (1 Cor. 5 : 7-13), and the duty to the returning penitent (2 Cor. 2 : 5-8). Liberty is enjoyed, but must not be exercised to the injury of others, but guided by the highest iftw of love (1 Cor., chap, s and 9). Christian benevolence is treated in 1 Cor. 16 : 1-4 and 2 Cor., chap. 8 and 9. Social life in the church is brought to view in 1 Cor. 7 : 16-24 ; 2 Cor. 6 : 14-16, etc. 2. As to the ministry. The nature, character, motives, responsibilities, and work of the Christian ministry are treated in 2 Cor., chap. 4, 5, and 6 ; by whom xxii THE SECOND EPISTLE to be exercised (i Cor. ii : 4, 5, i6; h : 24), They are to be supported by the churches ( 1 Cor. 9 : 13, 14 ; 2 Cor. 11 : 7-9) . 3. As to our ovm age and country. As Coriuth was a place of great mental activity, celebrated for its wealth and commercial and manufacturing enterprises, the obstacles to the gospel were in many respects similar to those in our own age. As Corinth lay between two seas, so our own great country lies between two oceans, drawing toward it the commerce and enterprises of the world. A spirit of pride and worldly wisdom, a lowering of moral standards, and losing sight of the headship of Christ, are affecting our Christianity. There is a tendency on the part of many to undervalue the simplicity of the gospel, to neglect spiritual gifts, to cover up immoral practices, to fail in the grace of Christian giv- ing, to engender party strifes and insubordination in churches and to pastors, to prefer a brilliant to a godly and experienced ministry, and to make both church and ministry subserve a worldly interest. The zeal, humility, consecration, self- denial, love, and earnest labor, such as Paul exercised, and the gospel he preached at Corinth, are needed to counteract and overcome these evils of our day. CONTENTS. This Epistle naturally divides itself into three parts. In the first seven chapters Paul explains his conduct in not coming immediately to them, l>ut going to Troas, and how he exercised his ministry toward them. In the eighth and ninth chapters he treats the grace of giving and the collection for the poor. Beginning with the tenth chapter, and on to the end of the Epistle, he vindicates his apostolic authority and character. The Epistle has also a historical setting, the past, present, and future, corresponding to its three divisions. ( see i : 8, 15 ; 2 : 12, 13; 7:5; 8:1; 10 : 1 ; 13 : 1.) First Part. — Explains why Paul first went to Troas instead of coming to Corinth, and the principles upon which he exercised his ministry, 1 : 1-7 : 16. I. Salutation, 1 : 1, 2. II. Reasons for first going to Troas, 1 : 3-2 : 17. 1. Divine consolation in suffering, 1 : 3, 4. 2. Enabled thereby to console others, 1 : 5-7. 3. Paul's affliction in Asia and their sympathy, 1 : 8-14. 4. Reasons for delaying his visit, 1 : 15-2 : 17. (a) Not fickleness on his part, 1 : 15-22. (b) But to spare them and help them, 1 : 23, 24. (c) And that he might not come in sorrow, 2 : 1-4. (d) So now advises the forgiveness and restoration of the penitent offender, 2 : 5-11. 5. Why he left Troas and came into Macedonia, 2 : 12, 13. 6. Exults in the triumphs of his ministry, 2 : 14-16. 7. His insufficiency, yet sincerity, 2 : 16, 17. III. Explains his ministry ; its principles, character, and results, 3 : 1-7 : 16. 1. His ministry accredited by his converts, 3 : 1-3. 2. Its sufficiency not in himself, but from God, 3 : 4-6. 3. Superiority to the ministry of the law, 3 : 7-11. INTRODUCTION xxiii 4. He and his fellow-laborers superior to Moses, 3 : 12-18. 5. His ministry true and genuine, 4 : 1, 2. 6. They that perish shut their eyes to the glory of Christ, 4 : 3-6. 7. The weakness of the minister but sets off the power of his ministry, 4 : 7-15. 8. But sustained by the hope of glorious immortality, 4 : Ui-o : lU. (a) Cheered by the prospects of eternal life, 4 : 16-18. (b) Looking for the future glorified body, 5 : 1-4. (c) Having an earnest of this, though as yet absent from the Lord, 5 : 5-8. (d) And stimulated by the thought of the judgment, 5 : 9, 10. 9. The motives : fear of the Lord, love of Christ, 5 : 11-15. 10. Their ministry one of reconciliation, 5 : 16-19. 11. Therefore preaches earnestly the Divine reconciliation, 5 : 20, 21. 12. How he aims to give elFect to this ministry, 6 : 1-10. 13. Appeals for an affectionate response, 6 : 11-13. 14. Warning against evil associations, 6 : 14-18. 15. Exhorting the pursuit of inward holiness, 7:1. 16. Exhorts them to trust him, 7 : 2-4. 17. His affection proved by his experience in Macedonia, 7 : 5-16. (a) Anxiety gave way to joy through the report of Titus, 7 : 5-7. (b) His former letter designed for their reformation, 7 : 8-12. (c) The end attained awakened his joy and hope, 7 : 13-16. Second Part. — Paul urges upon them to exercise the grace of giving for the poor of the saints of Jerusalem, 8 : 1-9 : 15. 1. By the example of the Macedonian Christians, 8 : 1-6. 2. By the example of Christ, 8 : 7-11. 3. Let there be a fair proportionment, 8 : 12-15. 4. The brethren in charge of this are trustworthy, 8 : 16-24. 5. Wishes them to sustain his boasts of them, 9 : 1-5. 6. Rich blessings will be returned to them, 9 : 6-11. 7. Will redound to God's glory, 9 : 12-15. Third Part. — Paul vindicates his apostolic authority and character, 10 : 1-13 : 14. I. His authority as an apostle, 10 : 1-18. 1. Declares his spiritual power, 10 : 1-6. 2. His authority a reality, 10 : 7-11. 3. Does not imitate the false pretenses of his opposers, 10 : 12-18. 11. Paul's defense against his accusers, 11 : 1-12 : 13. 1. Apologizes for his boasting, 11 : 1-20. (a) He does it out of interest and anxiety for them, 11 : 1-6. (b) His disinterested love, 11 : 7-11. (c) Guarding against dishonest men, 11 : 12-20. 2. Equal and superior to his opponents, 11 : 21-33. (a) Equal to them in race, 11 : 21, 22. (b) Superior to them in labors, sufferings, and deliverances, 11 : 23-33. xxiv THE SECOND EPISTLE 3. Abundant revelations, 12 : 1-6. 4. Continued suflfering and promised grace, 12 : 7-10. 5. The signs of his apostleship wrought among them, 12 : 11-13. III. His proposed apostolic conduct, exhortations, and warnings, 12 : 14-13 : 14. 1. Will still act disinterestedly and honestly, 12 : 14-18. 2. His object their reformation, 12 : 19-21. 3. When he comes will enforce discipline, 13 : 1-4. 4. Exhorts to self-examination, 13 : 5, 6. 5. Prays for their perfection, 13 : 7-9. 6. Writes in order to avoid using severity, 13 : 10. 7. Closing words, salutations, and benediction, 13 : 11-14. The comments in the commentary are on the Common version and the original Greek. But the Improved version is placed in parallel columns. This will be found valuable for comparison and reference. PAUL'S EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS Introduction, salutation, and theme of the Epistle. 1 PAUL, >a servant of Jesus Christ, 1 PAUL, a servant of Jesus Christ, a 15 : 16. Title. The oldest known title is simply To the Romans. Later it was enlarged to designate the writer of the Epistle. The fuller form is included and implied in the first and seventh verses of the salutation. CHAPTER I. The apostle begins with a marvel- ously full and rich salutation ; and then after a few introductory words of per- sonal interest passes, in ver. 16 and 17, to the ground thought of the Epistle. Through the remainder of the chapter he shows the need of the gospel, with the salvation it brings and the right- eousness it reveals, from the base moral condition of the Gentiles. 1-17. Salutation to the saints AT Rome, and the particular in- troduction to the Epistle. The salutation presents very strikingly Paul's manner. Ver. 1 and 7 form a complete sentence by themselves, the rest being parenthetic or relative sen- tences. Thoughts crowd upon him and press for utterance. Christ is the cen- ter, and around him thought suggesting thought revolves. In the introduction Paul expresses his thanksgiving for the well-known faith of the saints at Rome, and his prayerful desire for the mutual benefit which would arise from seeing and knowing them. This desire had been a well-formed purpose which he had been hindered from carrying out; but it was kept alive by a sense of duty to preach the gospel to all classes and everywhere. This he could readily and even joyfully do, since the gospel makes kno\vTi to men the divine salvation, re- vealing God's righteousness by faith. 1. Paul — meaning /?7//g ; his Roman name, which he uses in all his Epistles to the churches and fellow-laborers among the Gentiles, and is applied to him in the account of his Gentile work in the Acts. Saul was his Hebrew name, meaning the asked for, and was applied to him in his connection with the Jews, and in his earlier and less dis- tinctive work. See "Notes on the Acts," 13 : 9, where the change of his name first appears, for further discus- sion. According to the custom of his time Paul inscribes his name at the be- ginning instead of at the end of his letter. With his name he writes the statement of his ofiicial position as a servant and an apostle of Jesus Christ. This he did because most of the church at Rome were not personally acquainted with him, and because he was about to discuss the great doctrines under Divine direction and by apostolic authority. Compare the opening salutations of his other Epistles, especially those to the Galatians, the Philippians, and to Titus. Servant — literally, a slave, one who serves, answering in the Scriptures to a bond-servant. The word has the two- fold idea of belonging to a master and of service as a bondsman. Paul re- garded himself as belonging to Christ, to whom he owed the service of obe- dience (l Cor. 6 : 20; 7 : 23). But SUCh SCr- vice was true freedom (Gai. 5:i). The service of sin was slavery (e : i6-i9; John 8 : 34). The word servant is frequently applied in the New Testament to be- lievers in general (i Cor. 7 : 22 ; Eph. e : 6; 1 Peter 2 : 16) ; but Paul appcars here ^ to apply it to his general official position in the kingdom of God, just as in the 25 26 ROMANS [Ch. I. b called to be an apostle, separated unto 2 the gospel of God, (>^^ which he had promised afore "'by his prophets in the 3 Holy ScTii)tures,) concerning 'his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, f which was made of llie seed of David according 4 to the flesh ; and declared to be the Son called to be an apostle, set apart to the 2 gospel of God, which he promised be- fore through his i)rophcts in the Holy 3 Scriptures, concerning his Son, who was born of the seed of David accord- 4 lug to the flesh, who was instated as b See refs. Acts 22 : 21. c See refs. Acts 26 : 6. d 16 : 26 ; Gal. 3 : 8. e Ps. 2 : 7 ; John 5 : 17-30 ; Heb. 1 : 2, 3. / Matt. 1:1; Luke 1 : 32. Old Testament it was applied to proph- ets (Deut. 34 : 5 ; Jer. 23 : 4), and iu the NcW frequently to ministers of the gospel and to apostles (Col.4;12; 2Tiiu. :^:24: .laiiKs 1:1; 2 Peter 1 : l) . It waS a high llOUOr tO be a servant of Jesus Christ. Paul gloried in being spiritually and officially thus connected with such a Master. Called to be an apostle— ^livinely selected and appointed to the office. From the general designation of servant, Paul goes on to specify what kind of a servant, namely, an apostle. He had been called by Christ himself to the office, like the other apostles (Acts9:i5; 26:16-18; Gal. 1 : 1, 15, 16) . TllC apOStlcS were eye-witnesses of Christ's ministry, death, and resurrection, (sec Acts i : 21, and note). Paul speaks of having seen the Lord after his resurrection, and of the signs of his apOStleship (1 Cor. 9 : 1 ; 2 Cor. 12:12). The apostles had their three years' preparation with the Lord ; Paul, his three years in Arabia and Damascus (Gal. 1 : 17, 18), and also an alnindance of revelations (Gai. 1 : 12; 2 Cor. 12 : 1, 7). Sep- arated — set apart from the mass of men unto the work of preaching the gospel by God's choice and call (Acts 9: 15; Gai. 1:15.) There seems also to be a special reference to the act of the church at Antioch under the Spirit's direction (Acts 13: 1,2). This Paul specifies still more: not only called to the apostolic office, but set apart to the particular calling of preaching the glad tidings. Of God — as the authorand giverof tlie gospel, showing its dignity and au- thority (15 : 16: 1 Tl.ess. 2 : 2,8,9).* This VCrSC may be paraphrased thus: Paul, who has tlie honor to be a servant, or l)ond- man, of Jesus who is the Christ, to whom he and his service absolutely be- long, yet in whom he finds his highest freedom and glory, chosen and ap- pointed ])y him to he an apostle, set apart from among men, from bis ])irth (Gal. 1 : 14), at hjs conversion, and by the Spirit throngli the church at Antioch, to the particular work of an)ioi(ncin'^ the glad tidings of which God himself is the author. 2. This verse should not be put in a parenthesis, as in the Common version. In this and the two following verses Paul gives a brief description of the gospel, which had been promised or announced beforehand, amounting to a promise, through his prophets in the Holy Scriptures. These proph- ets included all who had uttered Mes- sianic predictions in the Old Testament. Paul holds up the gospel as no human inv^ention, no afterthought, but as com- ing from God, and long before promised through inspired men (Acts 3 : 22-24) , The phrase. Holy /Scriptures, in the original is without the article, but the adjective holy makes the noun definite. But Meyer renders literally, in holy 7rrit- ings, that is, in the prophetic portions of the Old Testament. In either ren- dering the thought is essentially the same. 3. Concerning his Son — the great theme of the gospel and of ^lessianic promises, without whom there could have been no gospel. The Son is pre- sented in two aspects, the Son of Man in this verse, and the Son of God in the next verse. According to the highest critical authorities Jesus Christ our Lord does not belong here, but at the end of ver. 4. AVhich was made, rather, ivho became or uxis borii, of the seed of David, intimating liis higli kingly character. It is also implied that in his birth there was a change of relation, that he had a previous exist- ence in another relation (Joim i:i4). According to the flesh — in respect to his human nature, body, soul, and spirit, distinguished from his divine nature brought to view in the next ver.se(i Tim. 3:16; Phil. 2: 7). Thusliewas David's nol)lest son, pre-eminently the Son, among the sons of men. (see ps. 89 : 26-37; 2 Tim. 2:8.) 4. And declared — determined, it was manifestly settled, that lie was the Ch. I.] ROMANS 27 of God with power, according sto the spirit of holiness, ''by the resurrec- 5 tion from the dead : by whom J we have received grace and apostleship, for obe- dience to the faith ^ among all nations, the Son of God with power according to the Spirit of holiness, by resurrec- tion of the dead, Jesus Christ our Lord ; 5 through wiiom we received grace and apostleship, for obedience of faith among all the nations, for his name's g He\/. '* : 14. h Acts 13 : 33-37. i Gal. 2:9; Eph. 3:2-9; 1 Tiux. 1 : 11, 12. ft Mark 16 : 15 ; Acts 9 : 15. Sod of God. Although he was the Son of God before his resurrection, yet he was openly defined and manifested as such by that great and crowning event. With power — literally, in poiver. Some would join this as an adverbial phrase with the preceding verb : De- clared, or determined powerfully to be, etc., as in Rev, 1 : 16, " The sun shines in his strength." But it is better to join it with Son. It was manifestly settled and shown by the resurrection that he was the Son of God in power, exalted and having all authority in heaven and on earth (Matt. 28 : i8 ; Phil. 2 : 9-11) , It ap- pears to refer to Christ's condition after his resurrection, with power, such as he did not have in his earthly condition and as born of the seed of David. Com- pare "in glory" (pwi- * : i9). Spirit of holiness — presenting holiness as an essential quality, a spirit to which belongs holiness. Holiness in the ab- stract is ascribed only to God (Exod. 15 : 11; isa. 6:3; Rev. 15 : 4). The refer- ence here is not to the Holy Spirit, but to Christ's divine nature which is con- trasted with the flesh, his human nature, in the preceding verse. In his divine nature he is spirit (John 4: 24)^ and the phrase spirit of holiness is evidently ap- plied to him as the Word who iii the beginning was with God and was God (johnl:l. Coiu4)aj-e9 : 5). By the reS- urrection from the dead. The res- urrection is here spoken of generally, which had its most glorious illustration in the resurrection of Christ. He is its author (-loUu 11 : 25, 26) and its first-fruits (1 Cor. 15: 20). Christ's resurrection is constanfly appealed to as a proof of his Messiahship (Acts 2 : 31-36: n : 31, etc.). And so at this point, according to the best text, comes in, Jesus Christ our Lord, in apposition with " his son " of verse 3. The son, in his two-fold na- ture, Son of David and Son of God, is here emphatically presented in his familiar three-fold title : Jesus, Sav- iour; Christ, the promised Anointed or 3Iessiah; our Lord, our Lord and Blaster, the Lord of the gospel dispensa- tion, the Head of the church, to whom all believers owe allegiance and obedi- ence. Paraphrase ver. 3 and 4 as fol- lows : Concerning his Son, the great theme of the gospel, ivho, being pre-ex- istent, became by birth of the royal seed, the noblest Son of David according to his human nature, the flesh, tvho was manifestly determined and shown to be the Son of God with power and author- ity in heaven and on earth, peculiar to himself, according to his divine nature, the spirit of holiness, by virtue of the resurrection of the dead of which his own resurrection was a proof and first- fruit (1 Cor. 15) J even Jesus Christ our great anointed Saviour and our Su- preme Master and Lord. On "Son of God," see note on John 1 : 34. 5. By {through) whom. Christ is \newed mediatorially, through whom he had received grace and the high calling of God (i5:i5). We— Paul uses the plural in speaking of himself, as was frequently done by Greek authors, though perhaps of himself as one of a class. Compare 3:9; Gal. 1 : 8, 9, etc., where Paul refers to himself by the plural "we." We have re- ceived — rather, we received, at a defi- nite time in his past history. Grace and apostleship. Some take this as a figure of speech to mean, the grace or gift of apostleship (Eph. 3:2, 7). It is better and more natural however to take grace, generally, the favor of God which he received at conversion and as a Christian, and apostleship as some- thing in addition which he received particularly and ofiicially from the Lord (-4cts 9 : 15; 26 : 16-18; Gal.'l : l). For obedience to the faith — rather, unto obedience of faith, expressing the design for which grace and apostle- ship had been conferred on Paul. It is better to take faith here, not as a system of Christian doctrine, but as tiiat exercise of belief and trust in Christ by which the gospel is accepted and with which obedience is invariably 28 ROMANS [Ch. I. 6 • for his name : among whom are ye also " the called of Jesus Christ : 7 To all that be in Rome, " beloved of God, called to be saints ; 6 sake ; among whom are ye also, called 7 to be Jesus Christ's— to all the beloved of God that are in Rome, called to be saints : Grace to you and peace from I Mai. 1 : 11. m 8 : 28-30 ; 1 Peter 5 : 10. n Deut. 33 : 12 ; Col. 3 : 12. o 1 Cor. 1 : 2 ; 2 Peter 1 : 3. connected. Faith is the controlling principle. To receive and act on faith is to obey. And as it is the design that Christ and the whole gospel should be received by faith, so the obedience re- quired of all by Christ is embraced in tiie gospel. Among all nations. Many regard this as including all na- tions, according to the last Commission (Matt. 28 : 19) aiid Paul's general treat- ment of the gospel as for both Jews and Gentiles. This accords also with the fact that the salutation was to all the saints at Rome, Jews and Gentiles (ver. 7^, and that his work among Gen- tiles IS not definitely introduced until ver. 13. Others, however, with strong reasons take it to mean : Among all the Gentiles. For so the word translated nations is commonly used in Paul's Epistles, occurring, according to Prof. J. R, Boise, fifty-five times, of which forty-four times it is translated Gentiles, four times heathen, and in other places nations. The corresponding Hebrew word also always means Gentiles or pagan nations. Moreover, the apostle- ship of Paul had special reference to the Gentiles and is so presented in this Epistle (11 : 13; 15 : 16). A strict interpre- tation would seem to demand this view. Yet may not the apostle have designed a certain indefiniteness of expression in the salutation of the Epistle, in defer- ence to the two classes of his readers ? Elsewhere he shows groat conciliatory tact, especially in his ad evangel- ize (Acts 8 : 25), aunouueiug the glad tid- ings coneerning Jesus as the Messiah and of salvation through him. IG, Paul passes naturally and in- formally to the leading thought or theme which he intendeil to develop in his letter : The gospel is the power of God for siiving men, both Jcms and Gentiles, on condition of faith, since it reveals a righteousness from God through faith alone. For introduces the reason for his readiness to preach the gospel at Rome, where there was so much grandeur and politeness, human learning and su]>erstition. I am not ashamed of the gfospel, though it is galling to human pride to meet the contempt cast upon the doctrine of the world's Messiah crucified as a nuile- factor (i Cor. 2 : 1-5). Paul had met it wherever he went; at Philippi. which was a colony, a miniature of Rome (Acts 16 : 12,21 : Phil.l : 30) ; at AthCUS, wllCrC he was called " a babl^ler " (Acts 17 : ih) ; at Corinth and throughout (ircece, where Christ crucified was a stuml)ling- block to Jews and foolishness to (Jen- tiles (1 Cor. 1 :2:i). Of Christ — should be omitted accordiiu; to the best (Jreek text. The gospel wliich Paul i)rca('hed included all about < 'hrist, his life, death, resurrection, and ascension ; that he was the Messiah, tlie Saviour of the wcritir to anything that man has ever devised ; etficaciously working and Icatling into ct)mplete and eternal salvation of the soul from sin and death, to every one tht'it believeth, without regard to national distinctions, to the Jew first in priority of time and in precedence of national privilege, and also to the Greek, the rest of mankind, the Gen- tiles (Luke 24 : 47 : .\cls 13 : 46) . NoticC tluit the gospel itself is the power of God, great, glorious, and efficacious (2Cor. 10 ; 3-6) ; the wliolc provisiou made in the gospel is meant, including the in- fluences of the Holy Spirit accompany- ing the W(U*d (l f"r. 1 : 18 : Heb. 4 : 12 ; Jium-s 1 : 18; .Kt. 23 : 29). To thc RoUiaUS, tllC most powerful of meUj it was fitting to style the gospel "thc power of God," but to tlie Greek the most eminent for human wisdom, Paul adds, " the wisdom of God" (1 Cor. 1:24). T(, every ove that believeth — that has faith in the gos]>el, which of course includes faith in Christ. Faith is not the ground of merit, but the medium of receiving Christ and salvation as proclaimed in thc gospel (Koin. 5:1; Phil. 3:9). 17. TIic gospel is the power of God unto salvation. For therein is a righteonsness of God revealed — or God's righteousness, that which juo- ceeds fnmi him as its author, is im- parted l)y him to the believer, and is I only acceptable to him. This right- eousness was foreshadowed in Abraham i (4:9), predicted in ])rophecy (isa. 56:i), but was not fully made known to men till it was revealed in the gos])el (Kph. 2:8.9). It is from faith to faith, literally, ont of faith into faith, begin- ning with faith iuid leading on to faith. It is from beginning to end of faith (9 : 30; 10 : 6 ; Phil. 3 : 9). It is appropriated ! so as to be personally available at first I and ever after by faith. To the believer Ch. I.] ROMANS 33 as it is written, faith. > The just shall live by from faith to faith ; as it is written, But the righteous shall live by faith. i See refs. Hab. 2 : 4. this righteousness becomes more and more a reality, a personal realization, but only by faith. Compare the phrase "from glory to glory" (iCor. 3:i8) and " from strength to strength " (Ps. 84 : 7), Also " of death unto death " (2 cor. 2 : le) . Faith is an exercise of the soul includ- ing belief and trust. As it is Avritten, in Hab. 2 : 4, The righteous shall have life from faith. Quoted also in Gal. 3 : 11 ; Heb. 10 : 38. In the Hebrew, Habakkuk says, "The righteous by his faith," or ''his faithfulness, shall live." Faith is implied and really in- cluded in faithfulness. ' ' This fa ithful- ne^s in the prophet's sense, nrviS. faith in the Christian sense, have the same fun- damental idea, trustful self -surrender to God" (Meyer). The faith of a heart accepted with God is always the same in its nature under whatever cir- cumstances exercised. Paul uses this expression as a brief summary of the Old Testament on this point, witliout reference to its particular use and appli- cation in Hal)akkuk. Some place a comma after faith. " The righteous by faith, shall live." It seems better, if a comma is used, to put it after "right- eous " ; but it is best to have no comma at all. Right eonsness and four kindred words, translated y«s^ or righteous, justify q.w*\ justification, are of first importance in Paul's writings. A clear understand- ing of these terms is needful in the ex- position especially of Romans and Galatians. They must therefore be briefly noticed here. They are derived from a Greek word {^>-<^, dike), mean- ing right, as folloM's : (1) Righteous or just {dikaios,SUaio^), This is used absolutely of God, as per- fectly righteous and holy, and is thus applied to Christ (3 : 26 ; 2 Tim. 4 : 8 ; 1 John 2 : 29: Acts 3 : 14). In this scnsc it can be rightly said of mankind, that there is not one righteous (3 : lo). In a relative sense, however, righteous can be applied to men, as upright, virtuous, and serv- ing God (Acts 10 : 22 ; Titus 1:8). It is ap- plied to them as approved of God (» = ■?), as acceptable to him by faith (this verse; Gal. 3:11; Heb. 10:38), Thus they are spoken of as "righteous before God" (2:13). This word occurs eighty-one times in the New Testament. In the Revised version it is translated sixty- three times righteous, eleven times just (nine of which are translated righteous in the Improved Bible Union version), and seven times right. (2) Righteousness {dikaiosune, Stxaio. o-v»"j), denoting the abstract idea or quality or state of one who is righteous. It never means justification, but simply righteousness, and is always so trans- lated in both the Comiuou and the Re- vised versions. This sense varies in its application. Sometimes it means the righteousness or holiness in the Divine character (3:5); sometimes godliness or true piety in man (6 : i3). Sometimes it is that righteousness which is reckoned to us on Christ's account (*:6), and sometimes that which, through and in connection with this imputation of Christ's righteousness, has become an effect in us _(6:i6, i9). Both of these ideas are at times united in this word, the righteousness which is reckoned to the believer and that resultant moral condition inseparably connected with it (2 Cor. 5:21). Righteousness in this pas- sage (ver. 17) appears to include this double meaning. As salvation in the preceding verse is a full and complete salvation of the soul, so righteousness here includes Avhat Christ does for us and in us. Both of these ideas Paul discusses and develops in this Epistle. So Dr. A. H. Strong, "Svstematic Theology," p. 486 (f.) : "This right- eousness includes sanctification as well as justification, and the subject of the Epistle to the Romans is not simply justification by faith, but rather riglit- eousness by faith, or salvation by faith. Justification by faith is the subject of chap. 1-7 ; sanctification by faith is the subject of chap. 8-16. We are not sanctified by efforts of our own any more than we are justified by efforts of our own." The particular application of this word in different passages, and Paul's use of it, will appear more ex- actly as we proceed in these notes. It occurs thirty-six times in this Epistle. (3) To justify {dikaiod, fittaiow) in New Testament usage means to shoiv. 34 KO.MANS [Cn. I. The ruin and guilt o/ the (ientUes. 18 ■' FOR the wrath of God is revealed 18 For God's wrath is rovoaled froui * 2 : 5, 6, 8, 9 ; Kzt-k. 18:4; Col. 3 ; «. or declare Hghteous. The former meaning is occasional and occurs in 3 : 4 ; 1 Cor. 4 : 4 ; 1 Tim. 3 : 16 ; Matt. 11 : 19 ; Luke 7 : 35 ; 10 : 29. The lat- ter meaning, in a judicial sense^ to de- clare one righteous and treat him ac- cordingly, is found elsewhere in Paul's Epistles, and is the predominant idea of the word elsewhere in the New Tes- tament. This act of God declaring and treating one as righteous for Christ's sake, carries along with it the forgive- ness of sins. The sinner is not only released from punishment, but accepted as though he had committed no offense (3:25; 4:6-8; 8:33). It also implies re- generation and the impartation of right- eousness (8 : 30 ; Phil. 3:9; 2 ("or. 5 : 17-19 ; (Jal. 6 : 15; John 5 : 24), (4) Justification {dikaimis, StKaitoo-ts) expressing the abstract idea of the verb justify. The act of God declaring men free from guilt and acceptable to him. This word occurs only twice in the New Testament (4:25; 5: is). (5) Justification {dikav'mia, fiiKaiw/xa) that which is divinely accounted right, namely, a divine reqnirement or ordi- nance (1:32; 2 26 ;8: 4; Luk.; 1:6; Heb. 9 : 1,10). Also that which the law regards or ac- counts right, a righteous act (5:i8; r the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being under- stood by the things p that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead ; so that heaven against all ungodliness and unrightecjusnessof men, who hold buck 19 the truth in unrighteousness ; because that which may be known of God is manifest in them ; for God manifested 20 it to them. For, since the creation of the world, his invisible things are clearly seen, being perceived by the things that are made, even his eternal power and divinity ; that they may be I Luke 12 : 46, 47 ; John 3 : 19-21. m Acts 14 : 17. n 1 .Juhn 1:9. o Ps. 19 : 1-6 ; Acts 14 : 17. p 2 : 15. primeval state in which a true knowl- edge of God was enjoyed. 18. Having presented salvation through a righteousness by faith alone, Paul proceeds to prove the necessity of ju.st such a provision. Tliis is evident from man's condition as a sinner, and as such condemned before God, For the wrath of God, etc. The tvrath of God is his antagonism against sin, and is infinitely removed from the ma- lignity of human anger. God's holi- ness and justice, and indeed his love and his entire nature, are diametrically opposed to all that is evil. Is re- vealed through man's conscience, through Divine interpositions and reve- lations from heaven, M'here God dwells. Paul assumes the exi.stence of God and his primitive justice as truths which exist in human consciousness, and force themselves on the knowledge and convictions of men. See ver. 24-32 for an illustration of how God has re- vealed his wrath. Such wrath from heaven should certainly suggest the ne- cessity of a righteousness from heaven. Against all kinds of ungodliness, impiety toward God, and unright- eousness, immorality and injustice among men. These two classes are a comprehensive summary of the objects of the Divine displeasure. Who hold the truth in unrighteousness — who possess the truth yet remain in sin, who know it yet refuse to obey it. So the verb hold is used in 1 Cor. 7 : 30 ; 2 Cor. 6 : 10. ( Compare James 2:1.) This vicW is favored by ver. 21, 28. This wrath is re- vealed against those who know some- thing of God's will and disregard it. Others, however, Avould translate more literally, hold hack the truth, repress it, in their reason and conscience, not allowing what they do know concern- ing God and his attributes, to have its proper influence, (ver. 21, 28), "Truth repressed is soon forgotten or perverted. ( Compare John 7 : 17. ) " There nccd be no conflict between these views as stated above ; for they who possess the truth and remain in sin must in a certain measure repress it, and vice versa. 19. Because introduces the reason of the statement of ver. 18. They were not ignorant of the truth which they disregarded and repressed, therefore " tlie wrath of God is revealed," etc. That Avhich may be known of God — from nature and providence; or as many translate. That ivhich is known of God from creation and providence. Is manifest in them — within their minds, in their heart.s. For God hath shewed, rather, manifested or made it known, unto them by his works and providence from the time man became an inhabitant of the earth (ver. 20). The historic or indefi- nite past tense is used. The knowledge of God among men preceded heathen- ism. This is the teaching of Scripture (o.n. 1. 2; Ecci.7:29) and is Confirmed by tradition. God's revelation is three- fold: (1) To the reason and conscience (2 : 15; John 1:9); (2) through CrcatioU and providence (ver. 20- Acts 14:17; 17: 25-28) ; and (3) through the Holy Scrip- tures including the gospel of the mani- festation of Christ. The first two are here meant in distinction from the last. 20. For confirms the statement just made. The invisible things of him — the attributes and i>erfections of his being which are not seen by tlie senses, from, rather, since, the crea- tion of the world (compare A-ts 15 : n) are clearly seen by the mind, being understood, or better, being jyerceivrd, by the things that are made — by means of his works. There has been no time or circumstance since the world was created at or in which men could have excuse, since the knoAvledge of God from his works was within their reacli. Heathen writers have expressed simi- 36 ROMANS [Ch. I. 21 they are without excase : because tliat, 4 when tlK'y knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful ; but ' became vain in their imagina- tions, and their foolish heart was 22 darkened. » Professing themselves to 23 be wise, tliey became fools, and changed the glory of the uncorruptible t God into an image made like to cor- ruptible man, and to birds, and four- footed beasts, and creeping things. 21 without excuse. Because, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, nor gave thanks ; but became vain in their reasonings, and their stupid 22 heart was darkened. Affirming them- selves to be wise, they became fools : 23 and changed the glory of the in- corruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds and fourfooted beasts and creep- ing things. q Ver. 28. r 2 Kings 17 : 15 ; Jer. 2:5; Kph. 4 : 17, 18. s Jer. 10 : 14 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 19-21. t See refs. Exod. 20 : 4 ; Ps. 106 : 20 ; Ezek. 8 : 10. lar sentiments. Even his eternal power — the first and prominent attri- bute which the works of creation would impress on tlie mind ; and Godhead, Divinity, tlie divine nature and char- acter. These are the invisible things ju.st spoken of. So that they are, or So that they may be, without excuse. Professor Boise suggests that both ideas, result and purpose, may be included here. Some may shut their eyes to the light ; others may not go through the process of reasoning. But even then where knowledge is attainable ignor- ance is no excuse. Or even if a whole nation is found utterly ignorant of God it only shoAvs how man through sin has degenerated, and sunk into spiritual darkness. See Fish's "Masterpieces," Vol. II., p. 463, sermon by President Maxcy; also "Christian Review," Vol. XXV., p. 105 ff. on Rom. 1 : 18-23. 21. Because introduces more em- phatically and more fully why they are without excuse. Because that having hioivn or knowing the true God, in con- trast to false gods, in the early history of the race and from time to time in all ages. Knowing of his existence and his chief perfections. Paul treats now of a matter of fact and shows what men did, although they had this knowl- edge. Heathen mythologies indicate the doctrine of the Divine unity to have been universally held among all na- tions in their early history. So also the Scriptures indicate this. Before the flood. (Sic Oen. 4:26; 5:24; 6:8.) After the flood for indications of the knowl- edge of the true God among the early nations. (S'-'- O.n. U : I8-2O : 20 : 5, 10 : Num. 22 : 8, 24; Jonah .T : 5) They ^lorificd him not as God, by worshiping and ol)ey- ing him as such, neither were they thankful, they did not give thanks to him as the source of all good. (Compare Dan. 5:23.) Thus they totally rejected God. But became vain in their imaginations — in their reasonings and speculations; became vain ref(-r- riiig to their foolish and base concep- tions of God, especially in their idol wor- ship. Heathen gods and their worship are spoken of in Scriptures as vanities. ( Acts 14 : 15 ; 1 Kings 16 : 13 ; 2 Kings 17:15; Jer. 8:19.) And their foolish heart, stupid and senseless, as to their whole inward being, w^as darkened ; losing all right views of God, their moral con- ceptions became more and more de- graded (lCor.3 : 20). 32. This sentence enlarges and proves the .statement just made. Pro- fessing, or affirming, themselves to be wise, making high pretensions to wisdom, they became fools, or foolish, in their conceit of wisdom. Such were the idle speculations of the early Greek philosophers who were justly condemned by Socrates. But special reference is had to the origin of idola- try, and to that worldly wisdom which engenders pride, separates from God, brings on spiritual blindness, and results in the worship of the creature rather than the Creator (i cor. i : 21 : jer. 10 : u). 23. The sentence continuing from the preceding verse illustrates their folly: And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God, the iniper- i.shal)le, eternal God with his glorious perfections, whom they ought to have worshiped, into an image, etc. In their conceptions they degraded God into the likeness of human beings, and even of the meanest creatures, and car- ried out these conceptions in making objects of worship. Or translate, An as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, <-MJod gave them over to none can plead exemption from all of them, and they indicate our fallen Ch. I.] ROMANS 39 with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, malicious- ness ; full of envy, murder, f debate, de- 30 ceit, malignity ; s whisperers, backbit- ers, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters ; inventors of evil things, dis- 31 obedient to parents ; without under- standing, covenant breakers, ^ without natural affection, implacable, unmer- 32 ciful: who i knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things ^ are worthy of death, not only do the same, but ihave pleasure in them that do them. eousness, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity ; whisperers, 30 slanderers, hateful to God, insolent, proud, boasters, devisers of evil 31 things, disobedient to parents, with- out understanding, covenant-breakers, Avithout natural affection, unmerciful ; 32 who, knowing the judgment of God, that they who practice such things are wortny of death, not only do them, but also have pleasure in those who practice them. / See 13 : 13 ; 1 Tim. 6 : 4. g See refs. Ps. 41 : 7. h Ps. 106 : 37, 38. I Ps. 50 : 18 ; Hosea 7 : 3. t 2 : 2, 14, 15. A 6 ; 21. and depraved condition by nature. These sins are not named according to any particular order, but rather for rhetorical effect; accumulated accord- ing as Paul's emotions bore him on toward the climax of his thought. Words denoting general sins and par- ticular sins are mingled together. See a similar catalogue of sins in 2 Cor. 12 : 20 ; Gal. 5 : 19-21 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 2-4. Be- ing filled — a strong expression, ex- tending to the whole being. With all unrighteousness of heart and life. Fornication — not found in the best manuscripts. Wickedness — the bad- ness of a vicious disposition. Covet- ousness — avarice, a greedy desire of gain ; a sin especially condemned by Paul (Eph. 5:3; Col. 3 : 5). MaliciOUS- ness — a spirit of malice, a disposition to inflict evil. The apostle proceeds to specify more particularly: Full of envy, murder (in the heart, a spirit of murder), debate, rather, strife, deceit, malignity — a mali- cious fault-finding, putting the worst construction on everything. Paul con- tinues his catalogue by designating per- sons by their most characteristic sins. Whisperers — who hint and slander in low tones and secretly. 30. Backbiters — who publicly speak ill and slander those who are absent. Haters of God, or hate- ful to God — exceptionally impious and wicked. Despiteful — insolent in words and acts. Proud — haughty, despising others and even treat- ing them with contempt. Boast- ers — empty pretenders. Inventors of evil things — of new devices to practise evil; authors of mischief (2 Mace. 7 : :n). Disobcdicut to pa- rents — breakers of the fourth com- mandment, and especially displeasing to God. 31. Paul concludes his catalogue by designating persons by some prevail- ing principle or sentiment that actuates their lives. Without understanding — stupid morally. Covenant break- ers — faithless, false to their contracts. Without natural alTection of love — heartless, (see Ps. loe : 37, 38.) As "mothers who exposed their children, emperors or satraps who put their broth- ers to death." — Jowett. Implacable. This word is not found in the best man- uscripts, and should be omitted. Un- merciful— " The dark places of the earth are full of the habitations of cru- elty " ( Ps- 74 : 20) . Merciless in the treat- ment of children and slaves, of the sick and the aged, and in their gladia- torial combats. 32. Who, knowing the judg- ment, or ordinance, of God — an ap- pointment of God having the force of law. See note on the word justifica- tion (.5) on ver. 17. That they who practise such things are worthy of death — they know this from their own consciences and from the lessons of their wisest teachers. It had been taught our first parents at the fall (Gen. 2:17), and it had been recognized in the laws and mythologies of the heathen. Compare Acts 28 : 4, where we may discover this moral sense of retribution in the natives of Melita. Not only do the same, but have pleasure in, or applaud those ivho practise them. Here, then, is the climax of depravity. They know the Divine ordinance of death for such sins, yet they practise them ! And deeper and more shameful still, they even ap- plaud others who practise them. Many 40 ROMANS [Ch. I. will eoudeinn in others what they do themselves; but these rejoiee iii in- iquity. Thus Paul has shown that the heathen are willful sinners, exposed to Divine wrath and sutiering from the results of their own depravity. Practical Remarks. 1. To be a servant of Christ is a greater honor than to be a lord or king among men (ver. 1 ; Luke 7 : 28 ; 1 John -1 : 4). 2. The gospel was the soul of the old dispensation (ver. 2 ; llev. 19 : 10 ; Acts 26 : 22, 23). 3. Christ is the center and circumfer- ence of the gospel (ver. 3; Rev. 1:8; Heb. 1:2; 1 Cor. 2: 1). 4. Christ is human and divine, the God- man, attested both by his birth and his resurrection (ver. 4 ; 2 Tim. 2:8; Phil. 2:5-10). 5. The ministry and the means of grace are designed to lead men everywhere to believe and obey God (ver. 5 ; 15 : 18 ; James 2 : 'z2, 26) . 6. Christians are saints, called to be Jesus Christ's, and beloved of God on his account (ver. 6, 7 ; 1 Cor. 3 : 21 ; Rom. 8 : 16, 39; Eph. 5 : 1). 7. The Father and the Son are equally the source of grace and peace, and equally the objects of prayer (ver. 7 ; 1 Tim. 1:2; Rev. 1:4; 5 : 13). 8. Christ is our Mediator, through whom our prayers and thanksgiving must ascend to God' (ver. 8 ; John 14 : 4 ; Eph. 5 : 20 ; Heb. 13 : 15). 9. We should be unceasing in our pray- ers for God's people everywhere (ver. 9 ; Gal. 6: 16; 1 Thess. 1 : 3, 4). 10. We should make journeying and the ordinary affairs of life subjects of prayer, and dependent on the will of God (ver. 10; James 4 : 14, 15). 11. One of the designs of the Christian ministry is to build up and strengthen be- lievers (ver. 11 ; 15 : 29 ; Eph. 4 : 11-13). 12. In spiritual friendship we both give and receive (ver 12; 3 .John 4-8; 1 Cor. 9:23). 13. As Christian workers we should ever be solicitous for fruit, the salvation of souls (ver. 13 ; John 15 : 16). 1 1. What Christ h;i.s done for us makes us debtors to preach the gospel to the world he came to save (ver. 14, 15; 1 Cor. 9 : 16-23). 15. There is something in the gospel of which the natural man is ashamed. Only the renewed soul can glory in the gospel (ver. 16 ; 1 Cor. 2 : 14 ; Gal. 6 : 14). 16. The power of the gospel is in the truth which embodies Christ, and reveals Christ to the soul (ver, 16; John 17:3; 2 Cor. 3 : 18; James 1 : 18). 17. The gospel produces not mere tem- porary effects, but extends unto salvation, a complete deliverance from sin and its consequences (ver. 16, 17 ; 1 Peter 1 : 5). 18. Unless we become united with Christ by faith, and receive heartily the righteousness which is of God, as the ground of our acceptance, we have no part in the salvation of the gospel (ver. 17; Acts 4 : 12; 8 : 20-23). 19. Sin is two-sided— being against God and against man. In the very nature of things, human and divine, it merits wrath and punishment (ver. 18; Eph. 5:6: Col. 3:6; Job 36 : 18). 20. There is nothing that prevents the spread and triumph of truth but sin (ver. 18, 19 ; John 3 : 20, 21 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 8). 21. God has never left himself without a witness to the reason and consciences of men (ver. 19 ; John 1 : 5, 9 ; Acts 14 : 17). 22. The visible creation is a proof of the existence of God though he is invisible (ver. 20; Ps. 19:1-6). 23. Sins committed against the light, and in spite of the light, are doubly with- out excuse (ver. 21 ; Ps. 14 : 1 ; John 9 : 41). 24. Tlie tendency of the race, even in the highest civilization and wisdom, has been away from God. Reformations have ever been followed by declensions (ver. 22 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 20, 21 ; Jer. 8 : 8, 9). 25. Idolatry is senseless, and betrays both mental and moral degradation (ver. 23, 25: Isa. 44 : 9-20). 26. God needs but to give up the sinner to his own desires to ensure his degrada- tion and punishment (ver. 24 ; Ps. 81 : 11, 12; Hosea4 : 17). 27. God abandons those who willfully abandon him. Irreligion and immorality are likely to go together (ver. 26. 28; Isa. 66 : :3, 4; 1 Sam. 2 : 30). Ch. IL] ROMANS 41 The greater guilt oj the Jews ; and the im- possibility of justification by the Law. 2 THEREFORE thou art ^ inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judg- est : ° for wherein thou judgest anotlier, thou condemnest thyself ; for thou that 2 judgest doest the same things. But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which 3 commit such things. And thinkest 2 WHEREFORE thou art without ex- cuse, O man, whoever thou art that judgest ; for wherein thou judgest an- • other, thou condemnest thyself ; for thou that judgest dost practice the 2 same things. Now we know that the judgment of God is according to truth, upon those who practice such things. n 2 Sam. 12 : 5-7 ; Malt..7 : 1, 2 ; John 8 : 9. 28. The sins of uncleanness are scrip- tural evidences of human depravity and God's disfavor (ver. 27; Eccl. 7:26; Prov. 22 : 14). 29. Sin is often its o^vn punishment, en- gendering other sins, and leading to phys- ical, mental, and moral degeneracy (ver. 29-31 ; Prov. 14 : 14 ; Gal. 6 : 7, 8). 30. The moral degradation of the heathen proves their need of a religion of divine power and a rigiiteousness from God (ver. 30 ; 16, 17 ; 1 John 5 : 19 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 13). 31. If the apostasy of the heathen was so terrible, how much more aggravating must apostasy be under the light of Chris- tianity (ver. 29-31 ; Matt. 11 : 22 ; 2 Thess. 2 : 8-12). 32. Sinners evince the climax of deprav- ity when they not only sin knowingly themselves, but also help others to do the same (ver. 32 ; Isa. 5 : 18-24). 33. The wrath of God is a revealer not against ignorance but against sin, disre- gard and disobedience of the truth (ver. 18-32). CHAPTER II. Having shown that the heathen are inexcusably guilty, Paul proceeds in this chapter to show first, that those who exhibit their superior knowledge in judging others, whether Jews or en- lightened Gentiles, must be inexcusable too. Then with this transition of thought he passes (ver. n) to a pointed application to the Jew, showing that he is thereby the more guilty and the more inexcusable, and that circum- cision cannot save him. 1-16. Application to the self- righteous, WHETHER Jew or Gen- tile, who condemn in others what they themselves practise, showing that they are guilty and inexcusable. Paul lays down general principles regarding Di- vine forbearance and justice to which they, especially the Jew, must assent. So that this section forms a transition in his discussion between the sinful and lost condition of the Gentile and the sinful and lost condition of the Jew. 1. Therefore, in view of what I have just said ( i : 18-32) thou art in- excusable, O man. This sudden and unexpected application is a pecu- liarity of Paul's style (ver. 17). Who- soever thou art that judgest — im- plying that they had that knowledge of God and of the ill-desert of sin spoken of in 1 : 20, 21, 32. The class addressed would be found both among Jews and Gentiles. For wherein thou judgest another— passeth unfavor- able judgment on the other, thy tellow- man, thy neighbor. Condemnest — a little stronger word than judgest. For thou that judgest doest, dost practise, the same things — the same in nature, not necessarily the same act, but equally sinful. The direct appeal to the conscience makes it the more forcible. The fact that he judges an- other shows that he has all the light necessary to render his own sinful prac- tice without excuse. Knowing the right and doing the wrong, was indeed holding the truth in unrighteousness (1:18). 2. But we are sure — we knoio; Christians, Jews, and intelligent Gen- tiles must at once assent to the state- ment he is about to make. That the judgment of God is according to truth, to right. There can be no error n©r injustice possible in God's judg- ment. This truth, confirmed alike by reason, conscience, and the Old Testa- rnent Scriptures, he makes the founda- tion of the application that follows. Against, or upon, them Avhich commit, or practise, such things. 42 ROMANS [Ch. II. thou this, O man, that judgest them which do "sufh things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judg- 4 ment of God ? Or, Pdespisest thou q the riches of his goodness and ■■ forbearance and s longsulfering ; 'not knowing that tlie goodness of God leadeth thee to re- 6 pentance ? But after thy hardness and impenitent heart "treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath and revehition of the righteous judg- 6 ment of God ; » who will render to every 7 man according to his deeds : to them 3 And reckonest thou this, O man, that judgest tliose who practice such things, and doest them, that thou shalt 4 escape the judgment of God? Or de- spisest thou tlie riches of his kindness, and forbearance, and long-suffering, not knowing that the goodness of God 5 is leading thee to repentance ; and after thy hardness and impenitent heart, art laying up for thyself wrath in the day of wratli and of' the revela- tion of the righteous judgment of 6 God ; who will render to every man 7 according to his works ; to those o 1 : 32. iJ 6 : 1, 15 ; Eccl. 8 : 11. 9 9 : 23 ; Eph. 1 : 7 ; 2 : 4, 7. /• 3 : 25. s See refs. Kxod. 34 : 6. t Job 33 : 27-30 ; Jer. 3 : 12, 13 ; Hosea 5 : 15 ; 2 Peter 3 : 9, 15. u Deut. 32 : 34 ; James 5 : 3. X 14 : 12 ; see refs. Job 34 : 11 ; Jer. 17 : 10 ; 1 Cor. 3:8; Rev. 20 : 12. every enlightened man, whether Jew or Gentile, admits this statement. 3. And can there be any escape ac- cording to the principle laid down ? If so it must be either on man's side (this verse) or on God's side (next verse). And thiukest thou this — but reckon- est thou, in face of the proposition, that the judgment of God is according to truth, that thou shalt escape, etc. Since God is just and righteous will he not condemn those sins which ye your- selves condemn, and condemn them in you as well as in others? The mere question was sufficient answer. Reason, conscience, and the word of God, would promptly respond. There is no escape so far as what man can do is concerned. As to the Jew hiding himself within the Abrahamic covenant, Paul notices that farther on, in ver. 25-29, in which he shows that circumcision cannot pro- tect .the sinner. 4. Or, if thou art not counting on thus escaping, art thou thinking that the goodness of God is so great that he will for])ear to punish thee? Thus to do was to (lespifte his goodness: De- spisest thou the riches, the wealth, the abundance (9 : 2.-<) of his §fOod- ness, etc. Goodness is the kindness which God exercises toward men. For- bearance is tolerating and enduring, hoUling back, as it were, liis vengeance. liOngsuflTering is liis patient waiting, his slowness in avenging wrongs (2 Peter 3:5-9: Ps. 103. h). How vast Paul's con- ception of Divine inn to any other ground of judgment. Paul is not speak- ing here of the provisions of the go.s- pel, but is expounding the law, and Ch. II.] ROMANS 43 who by patient continuance in well- doing seek for glory and honour and 8 immortality, eternal life: but unto them that are contentious, and y do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteous- 9 ness, indignation and wrath, tribula- tion and anguish, upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the Jew '■ first. who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honor and 8 immortality, eternal life ; but to those who are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteous- 9 ness, wrath and indignation, tribula- tion and distress, on every soul of man that works evil, of the Jew first, and y Job 24 : 13 ; 2 Thuss. 1 : 8. z Ma.t. 11 : 20-24 ; Luke 12 : 47, 48 ; 1 Peter 4 : 17. righteousness by the law. In this and the following five verses he teaches that the Divine awards will be not accord- ing to race or rank, relations or profes- sions, but according to their works, which will indicate their real character. Tlie honest Gentile would naturally assent, for why, he might say, should God deal partially with the Jew. The Jew could not but admit that this was taught in their own Scriptures. Indeed this verse is a quotation from Prov. 24 : 12. (Comp. Job 34 : 11; Ps. 62 : 12 ; Jer. 17:10, etc.) The Christian reader must also assent (l Cor. 3:13; 2 Cor. 5:10; Ual. 6:7,8). But Paul does not here speak of works as a ground of merit. (See on ver. 13.) Faith also is a work of God (John 6 : 29 ; Rom. 4:3; James 2 : 21-26) , but Paul had no occasion to speak of it in this part of the discussion (3 : si), 7. Paul proceeds to explain in de- tail. To them, on the one hand, who by patient continuance, or constancy, in well doing, in conduct, in every good work which piety begets and demands. They who are un- swerved, even by the greatest trials and suiFerings, from their deliberate purpose and loyalty to God and the truth (Luke 8:15; 2 Thess. 1:4; James 5:11; Rev. 13 : lO). Seek, by this persevering life of piety in God's service, glory, honor, and immortality. These three words form a full and complete description of future salvation. The glory is the splendor of that perfected life (Matt. 13 : 43) ^ the honor that comes to it like a prize to a victor ( 1 Cor. 9 : 25 ; James 1:12; 1 Peter 5:4), and ini- mortality is its imperishableness (i Peter 1 : ♦). Man at first was crowned with glory and honor (ps. 8 : 5) which he lost, but these seek to regain them with that immortality which will free them from all that is perishable. To those thus seeking he will render (ver. e) eternal life, life in the highest and truest sense, spiritual, in holy and loving harmony with God, and everlasting. The gospel reveals also that it consists in knowing Jesus Christ (John 17 : 2). Paul, from his higher Christian viewpoint, describes future blessedness. 8. Butunto them, on theother hand, who are contentious, or factious, having a self-seeking and partisan spirit, corresponding very closely to that de- scribed in ver. 5. With their stubborn- ness they do not obey the truth (1:18), and in their persistence they obey unrighteousness — and hence are the servants of sin and Satan (e : 17; John 8 : 44) . Thus dircctly and indirectly they factiously contend against God's revealed will, a sin committed indeed by Gentiles, but often by the Jews as well (Isa. 1:2-4; Jer. 5 : 23 ; Acts 7 : 51). To such shall be rendered (according to the best Greek text) indignation and wrath. The former word ex- presses the internal heat and the more permanent feeling ; the latter the sud- den bursting forth of feeling and the stronger passion. But both words as expressing the just retribution of sin, and as connected with God, must be regarded as the outbursting of his holi- ness and justice against sin. 9. In this and the next verse Paul recapitulates what he had said in the two preceding, inverting the order and emphasizing the universality of the retribution. The change gives vivid- ness and force to his language. Tribu- lation and anguish. The first word expresses that affliction that comes from without ; the second, that distress and hopelessness which is felt within. Upon every soul of man, whoever, doeth, is working, practising evil. Soul, while it may suggest that part of man which feels pain, seems to be used as in chap. 13 : 1 for the whole man, and calls to mind the formulas of the law, and gives solemnity to the warning (Lev. 5:1). This should come, according to the principles of truth and righteous- ness, upon every soul of this class, of the Jew first, who, so far from enjoy- ing special favor, should on account of 44 ROMANS [Ch. II. 10 and also of the Gentile; 'but glory, honour, and peace, to everj' man that worketh good, to the Jew first, and 11 also to the Gentile. For •'there is no respect of persons with God. 12 For as many as have sinned « without law shall also perish without law : and as nuinv as have «i sinned in the law 13 shall be judged bv the law ; For •> not the hearers of the law are just before God, f but the doers of the law shall be jus- 14 tified. For when the Gentiles, e which 10 also of the Greek ; but glory and honor and peace to every man that works good, to the Jew first, also to the Greek. 11 For there is no respect of persons 12 with God. For as many as sinned without law will also perish with- out law ; and as many as sinned with 13 law will be judged by law ; for not the hearers of the law are righteous before God, but the aoers of law will 14 be justified : (for wben Gentiles, who a 1 Pcltr 1:7. b See refs. Deut. 10 : 17. c 1 : 19, 20. d Gal. 2 : 16-19 ; 3 : 10 ; James 2 : 10, 11. e Matt. 7 : 21-27 ; James 1 : 22-25. / 10 : 5 ; Lev. 18 : 5 ; Gal. 3 : 11, 12. g Eph. 2 : 12. greater light and higher privileges be first in condemnation and punishment (1 : 16; Luke 12 : 47,48). And alSO of the Gentile, rather, of the Greek. None of this class shall escape this impartial tribunal. 10. But glory, honour. (Seeon ver. 7.) Peace is used here instead of im- mortality in ver. 7, and refers to the tranquil, blessed state of the righteous after death. To every man that worketh good. In the original worketh is not so full and strong as its compound word "worketh" in ver. 9. There the idea is of accomplishing, per- petuating, ew\\; here the idea is the giv- ing of one's strength to doing the good, working for it. To the Jew first- having received the oracles of God (3 : 2) and the first offers of salvation. And also to the Gentile — the Greek, who on this account shall not be ex- cluded. 11. This verse forms a connecting link between the preceding verses of this chapter and the next five verses. This equitable distribution without par- tiality must be made, For there is no respect of persons, partiality on account of outward conditions such as rank or race, with God. (James 2: 1-4 ; Eph. 6:9: Col. 3 : 25.) This WaS taUgllt in the Old Testament (Deut.io:n), but tlie Jew limited this to God's dealings with his chosen people. Paul uses it with a broader application, as also did Peter to Cornelius at Csesarea. See Acts 10 : .34 and note, where a kindred word of the same formation is used, 12. This principle of impartiality in th<' divine government is explained and illustrated in respect to both Jew and Gentile (v,r. 12-I6). For introduces the reason and contirmation of tlie stnte- ment of the preceding verse, with spe- cial reference to future condemnation. All shall be treated according to the light they have^ and their opportunity of knowing their duty. For as many as have sinned, rather, as sinned, be- ing viewed in the past with reference to the future judgment. Without law — the written law, referring to the law of Moses. Shall perish — be con- demned and punished without the written law, with due allowance for the circumstances under which they sinned. Perish means here shall incur the loss of true or eternal life{yeT.T; John 3: 16). And as many as sinned in the law, in possession and with the knowledge of it, shall be judged by the law, their condemnation being implied. Paul here states a general fact in regard to the impartiality of the rule by which men are to be judged. It would commend itself to the reason and conscience of both Gentile and Jew, and it also accorded with the Scriptures of the latter (nan. 12:2). 13. Paul enforces the declaration in the last clause of ver. 12, showing that it was useless to possess and know the law unless it was obeyed. For not the hearers of the law, like the Jew who heard it read constantly in their synagogues, are just, or right- eous, before God, but the doers of the law shall be justified, shall be counted righteons, that is, actually so (James 1 : 22;" 4 : 11). Pa 111 is UOt hcre speaking of gospel justification, but of a legal principle in God's government. The law required perfect obedience; and this included sinlessness in heart aiul life. "This do and thou shalt live" (Lukcl0:28, on which sec note). TllC JcW is taken upon his own ground. The ])ossession of the law could not make him righteous unless he obeyed it. He Ch. II.] ROMANS 45 have not the law, ^ do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto 15 themselves : which shew the work of the law i written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the meanwhile ^ accus- 16 ing or else excusing one another ; i in the day when God shall judge the se- have no laAV, do by nature the things required by law, these, having no law, 15 are a law to themselves ; who show the Avork of law written in their hearts, their conscience testifying with it, and between one another" their thoughts 16 accusing or also excusing ;) in the day when God will judge the secrets of h Ver. 27. t 1 : 18-20. k Gen. 3 : 8-11 ; Eccl. 7 : 22 ; 1 John 3 : 19-21. I Eccl. 12 : 14 ; 1 Cor. 4:5; Rev. 20 : 12. could not count upon certain privileges as a Jew ; he must rigidly keep the re- quirements of the law. " The thought- ful Jew must have felt how impossible it was for him to be justified on this principle ; and to create this conviction was the object of the apostle in this en- tire connection " (Boise). 14. In this and the next verse the apostle illustrates and defends the state- ment in the first clause of ver. 12 in respect to the Gentiles who without the written law have the light of nature for their guide. For when Gentiles, pagans, (omit the) — some of them — who have no revealed laio, do by nature, from their natural impulses without any higher instruction, the things required by law, moral duties toward God and man. Pagans perform many virtuous deeds. He does not say that they fully obey the law, but he only means so far as they do this. They have the law of nature or con- science — their own innate perceptions of what is right and wrong, guided by conscience; and by this law they are to be judged. Whether any one ever actually attained to eternal life without the gospel revelation is not the ques- tion, and is not here referred to. Ilav- ing no law, in the sense that tlie Jew has it, are a law unto themselves — the voice of their own moral nature is their rule, which the constitution of their minds teaches them to revere as the law of Him who formed it. God is author of both the written and unwrit- ten law, and so far as they run parallel, they must agree. ( see next verse. ) 15. Inasmuch as they shew the w^ork of laiv, its operation, not so much by what it requires as by what it performs, written in their hearts — in their inner intelligent being. They show the work and office of law, in their inner perceptions of right and wrong, corresponding to the more im- portant precepts of that law written on tables of stone. Note that it is not on but in their hearts. Their con- science, their moral sense or judg- ment, also bearing witness, rather, loitnessing therewith, with the outer manifestation of this inner law, and confirming it by its testimony. And their thoughts the meanwhile, better, And between one another, that is, between these pagans, their thoughts, in reviewing one another's conduct, accusing or also excusing, according to the decisions of their moral judgment. Thus this inner law is shown by its outer operations, by conscience, and by the mutual judgment of their thoughts regarding one another. 16. There is a difference of opinion among expositors in respect to the con- nection of this verse with what goes be- fore. Some would connect it directly with ver. 15, which is manifestly im- possible unless we suppose that Paul omitted some connecting thought he had in mind. There evidently precedes this a parenthetic passage or tiiought. But where to begin it is the question. Alford would begin with ver. 11. But this seems too remote; Meyer begins with ver. 15 ; Beza with ver. 14. It would seem that with the end of ver. 12, Paul proceeds in ver. 13 to explain the last clause of ver. 12, beginning with For ; and having done this, it occurred to him that the first clause of ver. 12 equally needed explanation, which he does in verses 14, 15, beginning again with For. Having thus explained the two clauses of ver. 12, he proceeds in ver. 16 with his regular course of thought. Thus the parenthetic passage seems to be ver. 13, 14, and 15. It was a peculiarity of Paul to throw in paren- thetic thoughts. It indicates the high state of spiritual emotion in which he wrote. In the day — connect with ver. 12; ^vill be judged by laiv in the 46 ROMANS [Cii. 11. cretsof men "' In' Jesus Christ, ° accord- ing to luy gospel. 17 Behold, "thou art called a Jew, and prestest in the law, i and inakest thy 18 boast of God, and 'knowest his will, and "approvest the things that are more excellent, being instructed out 19 of the law ; and art confident that men, according to my gospel, through Jesus (,'lirist. 17 But if thou art called a Jew, and restest on law, and gloriest in God, 18 and knowest his will, and approves! the things that are excellent, being in- 19 structed out of the law ; and believest m See rcfs. John 5 : 22-29. n 16 : 25 ; 2 Tim. 2 : 8. q Isa. 45 : 25 ; Micah 3 : 11 ; John 8 : 41. See refs. Luke 3 : 8. r 3 : 2 ; Deut. 4 : 8. j> 9 : 4 ; John 9 : 28, 29. s Phil. 1 : 10. day ; that is, at the final judgment, ac- cording to the universal usage of the New Testament (Matt. 7 : 22, etc.). Shall judge the secrets of men — what human judges cannot detect, what the sinner hides from others, and even what he himself may blindly fail to see. According to my gospel — which he was commissioned to preach (Gai. 1 : 1, 9, 11.12). A day of judgment by Jesus Christ was one of its doctrines (Acts 17 : 31 ; 2 Cor. 5 : 10 ; 2 Thess. 4.1; John 5 : 22 ; Acts 10 : 42). Ju that day, also would be veri- fied the great principle which he has explained in ver. 13-15. So doubtless it vividly appeared to Paul as he passed from his parenthetic thoughts to this verse. 17-29. The Jew, directly ad- dressed KNOWS God's law better, BUT KEEPS IT STILL LESS. NOR CAN CIRCUMCISION SAVE HIM. His need of God's righteousness is therefore apparent. In the preceding section Paul had passed gradually and skill- fully to the Jew, naming him first in ver. 9, having .secured his co-operating conscience. The Jewish reader must have felt that he was being addres.sed, when now Paul turns suddenly upon him in ver. 17. Such carefulness and such surprises were characteristic of Paul. ( Compare Acts 13 : 40 ; 17 : 31 ; 22 : 21. ) 17. Behold — If, according to the oldest and best manuscripts. Thou — emphatic. Notice how it is repeated in ver. 21. If thou art called, sur- named, or denominated, a Jew — if thou art entitled in addition to your personal name a Jew. Tlie name Jew, mean- ing praised, was a matter of national and religious pride (r^ut. - : 2.i). As they did not re- gard heathen temples sacred, and these contained many things of great value, it is altogether proliable that they often took valuables from them. They shrank in abhorrence from the pollution of idols, but neither their pollution nor that of the idol temples would deter them if they could only get the gold and silver. The same spirit led them to make the house of God a den of rob- bers (Matt. 21 : 13)^ and to commit the sin of robbing God by withholding from him what was his due (Mai. 3 : 8, 9). 23. Thou that makest thy boast, or, that gloriest in the law, thnmgli the transgression o/the law dishonour- est thou God ? Thus showing incon- sistency and hypocrisy in their con- temptuous treatment of the true God, the author and giver of the law. Meyer regards this verse as the answer of the four preceding questions, and punctuated it as such. It might be so taken. But the climax of thought appears better, by regarding this also as a question. It includes all the pre- ceding questions and much more. Notice the gradation: Steal, commit aduftcry, robbing temples and sacrilege, and contemptuous treatment of God. Again.st thy neighbor, thyself, things sacred, God. Similarly Bengel. 24. For connects the statement made in the preceding verse witli the quotation here given. The name of God is blasphemed, brought into contempt and reviled, amon&: the Gentiles through you, better, on acroH)it of yoii, l)ecause of your wicked lives and immoralities. Tiiey would say that Jeliovah was corrupt and im- pure like their own heathen gods. As it is written — as true now as when first written. This comes after the quo- tation, indicating both that it is a gen- eral quotation, and used tlescriptively of the then present condition of things. It is better to take it, not as a quotation of any particular passage, but the sul)- stance of several passages (i-^a. 52 : 5: Ezek. 36 : 20-23 ; Neh. 5 : 9 ; Mai. 1 : 12), 25. The Jew could not but assent to the force of the apostle's reasoning, and acknowledge consequent guilt, but was he not on account of his connection with Abraham and circumcision en- titled to favor and certain immunities from the strict construction of the law ? This was the ceremonial distinction to which tlie Jew attached the most im- portance. It was a common opinion among the Jews that no circumcised man would go to hell. Paul therefore proceeds to show that even this could not save the Jewish sinner. For I grant that circumcision indeed pro- fiteth, if thou keep, or doest, the law, if thou habitually do the require- ments of the law. (See on ver. 13.) Cir- cumcision was indeed an advantage to the Jew if he were a good man ; it was profitable to him spiritually to be thus connected with God's chosen people, to be the first to whom Christ and the gospel should be presented (1 : 16) ; it gave him special advantages for becoming a Christian, and if his obedience were perfect he would be en- titled to all the blessings promised l)y the law. But if thou be a breaker, or transgressor, of the law, thy cir« cumcision is made, or h((s become. uncircumcision. As a sign of a covenant it was of value only as the covenant was kept ; but through a vio- lation of tlie covenant circumcision l>e- comes in effect uncircumcision ; the Jew comes into the same condition nio^ ally as the CJentile. As a mere rite it had no merit. It might indicate a righteousness l)y faith in the lieart, on the promi.se of God to the heirs by faitli (4:ii-i.t). But Paid had not reached these points in his discussion. 26. Paul draws a logical inference from the statement just made. Jf, Ch. II.] ROMANS 49 26 made uncircumcision. Therefore ^it the uncircumcision keep the righteous- ness of the law, shall not his uncircvun- cision be counted for circumcision? 27 And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, •= judge thee, who '^ by the letter and circumci- 28 sion dost transgress the law ? For <^ he is not a Jew, f which is one outwardly ; neither is that circumcision, which is 29 outward in the flesh ; but he is a Jew, which is one inwardly ; and s circum- cision is that of the heart, •» in the spirit, and not in the letter ; i whose praise is not of men, but of God. 26 has become uncircumcision. If then the uncircumcision keep the require- ments of the law, shall not his uncir- cumcision be reckoned for circumci- 27 sion ? And shall not the uncircumcision that is by nature, if it fulfils the law. judge thee, who with the letter and circumcision art a transgressor of law ? 28 For he is not a Jew, who is one out- wardly ; nor is that circumcision, 29 which* is outward in the flesh. But he is a Jew, who is one inwardly ; and circumcision is that of the heart, in spirit not in letter ; whose praise is not from men, but from God. 6 Isa. 56 : 6, 7 ; Matt. 8 : 11, 12 : Acts 10 : 34, 35 ; 1 Cor. 7 : 18, 19. c Matt. 12 : 41, 42. d 7 : 6. .? 9 : 6-8 ; Matt. 3:9; Gal. 6 : 15. / Matt. 23 : 25-28. g Deut. 10 : 16 ; 30 : 6 ; Phil. 3:3; Col. 2 : 11. A 7 : 6 ; Johu 3:5-8:2 Cor. 3:6. t 1 Sam. 16 : 7 ; 1 Cor. 4 : 5 ; 2 Cor. 10 : 18. therefore, by parity of reason, the un- circumcision keep the right- eousness, the things accounted right, that is, the requirements of the law (seeonl : 17 (5)), shall UOt hiS UUCir- cumcision be accounted, or be reck- oned, for circumcision ? A fine illus- tration of the phraseology of 4 : 3 ; Gal. 3 : 6. The moral requirements of the law are here meant. In such a case would not the Gentile be treated as favorably by God as the Jew ? ( Compare Acts 10 : 35.) The Jcw could hardly deny the conclusion. 27. This verse can be punctuated as a question or as a period. Each is sup- ported by eminent authorities. The latter regards this as an answer to the I preceding question, the affirmative j being self-evident: And the uncircum- cision by nature, etc. The interroga- tive form naturally follows the pre- ceding question and gives a certain vivacity and force, and is preferred in these notes. And shall not the un- circumcision, which is by na- ture — occasioned by the circumstances of birth, a Gentile. Judge, condemn, thee (Mat. 12 : 41). Who by the let- ter, rather, loho with a written law, and circumcision, descriptive of his state or condition in contrast to the Gentile ; who possessing these, and impliedly in spite of them, dost transgress the law (l Sam. 15 : 22 ; Matt. 12 : 42. See ver. 14, 15) . 28. This verse and the next are ex- planatory and confirmatory of the pre- ceding two ver-ses. They also give us a beautiful specimen of Paul's condensed and vigorous style. For he is not a Jew, a genuine Jew, a true child of God, which is one outwardly — one in mere form and outward show. Nor is that circumcision truly, which is outward in the flesh — this is not the true circumcision which indicates one to be beloved of God. Mere out- ward religion and forms are denounced in the Old Testament (i^a. 29 : 13). 29. Having made the statement negatively (ver. 28), he now makes it affirmatively. The former being ac- cepted as true, the latter must be also accepted. But he is a true and genuine Jew, which is one iuAvardly, in the hidden parts, in the soul (ps. 51 : 6) ; and circumcision is that of the heart, or and there is a circumcision of the heart. "Circumcise therefore the foreskin of your heart" (oeut. 10 : le). "And the Lord thy God will cir- cumcise thy heart" '(Deut. 30 : 6). In the spirit — in the spiritual nature effecting a purification of it, instead of in the flesh (ver. 28). Compare what is said elsewhere in Scripture of the un- circumcised in heart (Lev. 26 : 41 ; Jer. 9 : 26; Ezek. 44 : 9 : Acts 7 : 51 ). SomC refer this to the Holy Spirit. This circum- cision is, of course, effected by the Holy Spirit, but it is performed upon the spiritual nature of man. Not in the letter — not in the literal observance of mere rites (2 cor. 3:6). Whose praise is not of men — that is, of the true Jew (John 1:47). The truly pious does not thus seek honor from men, but rather of God. A rebuke to Jew- ish pride and vain-glory (John 5: 44: Gal. 6 : 12). The above views would be well under- stood by the more pious and spiritually enlightened Jews, who looked beyond the letter of the law to its deeper and 50 ROMANS [Ch. II. spiritual meaning (Mitau 6 : 6-8). See the scribe's answer to Jesus in Mark 12:32-34. "Tlie Jew consists in the innermost parts of tlie heart," is quoted from the Talmud. Paul therefore ap- peals to the conscience on the ground of well-known and admitted truths; and shows that the Jew as wtII as the Gentile was inexcusably guilty, that he could hope nothing from external ob- servances either in obtaining salva- tion or in exemption from condemna- tion, and hence needed tlie righteous- ness of God (vor. 1 : 17). Practical Remarks. 1. The self-righteous, who are generally censorious and hypocrites, are inexcus- able and self-condemned (ver. 1 ; Matt. 23 : 23 ; 29-31 ; Luke 18 : 9-14). 2. God is just ; without partiality on the one hand, or prejudice on the other (ver. 2 ; Ps. 89 : 14 ; Isa. 45 : 21). 3. The refuges of a deceived and de- ceitful heart will fail men at last (ver. 3: Isa. 28: 17; 44 : 20). 4. God's goodness is despised and per- verted by any who hope thereby to es- cape just punishment (ver. 4:10:21 : Ps. 78:36-41, 61). 5. The goodness of God is designed to lead sinners to repentance, but if it fails the fault is their own (ver. 4 ; Matt. 23 : 37 : John 5 : 40). 6. If God's goodness does not soften, it will harden the heart and aggravate the guilt (ver. 5 ; Eccl. 8:11: 2 Peter 3 : 3-7). 7. The day of judgment will be to the finally impenitent a day of wrath and woe (Ver. 5 , Rev. 6 : 17 ; Matt. 25 : 41-43). 8. The retributions and rewards of the judgment will be according to those works which are an index of the char- acter and life (ver. 6-8 ; Prov. 24 : 12 ; Jer. 32:19; Matt. 2-5 : 14-29). 9. The truly righteous are indicated by their perseverance in well-doing and in seeking heavenly things (ver. 7 ; Rev. 2 : 10; Heb. 10:38, :39). 10. The wicked are rebellious toward God, disobedient to the truth, and Avork- ers of evil (ver. 8, 9 ; Isa. 1:2; 2 Thess. 1:8). 11. Whether Jew or Gentile, Christian or heathen, none will be saved but the truly good ; none lost but the truly wicked (ver. 6-10; 2 Thess. 1:6-9; 1 Peter 4 : 17, 18). 12. The heathen are in a perishing con- dition and need the salvation offered in the gospel (ver. 12; Jer. 10 : 25). 13. Nothing short of perfect obedience can satisfy the claims of the law (ver. 13 ; James 2 : 10). 14. The heathen are not to be judged by a law they never had, but by that standard revealed in the works of crea- tion and to their own reason and con- science (ver. 14, 15; 1 : 20: Isa. 40 : 21-26). 15. There is in every man that which accuses and excuses, call it what Ave may, which is not the result of education, since it can itself be educated (ver. 15; 9: 1; 13:5; 2 Cor. 4:2). J 6. The fact that the secrets of the heart are to be manifested and that Jesus Christ is to be- the Judge, invests the judgment with an awful character (ver. 16 ; 1 Cor. 4 : 5; Matt. 10:26, 28). 17. Character and conduct, and not out- ward professions, are the tests before God now, and Avill be at the judgment (ver. 17 ; Matt. 7 : 21, 22 ; 1 Sam. 16 : 7). 18. Boasting instead of gratitude, de- spising others instead of wishing to save them, are evidences of formalism and self-righteousness (ver. 17-20; Luke 18 : 9). 19. Neither the knowledge of the truth, nor teaching the truth, but doing and keeping the truth, is what God requires (A^er. 18-20 : Micah 6:8: John 13 : 17). 20. Back of a form of knoAvledge and truth there is a spiritual discernment and life (ver. 20 ; 2 Tim. 3:5: 1 Cor. 2 : 14). 21. We should illustrate godly teaching by godly living (ver. 21 : Matt. 23 : 3). 22. A man's life and practice do more than his Avords to honor or disgrace relig- ion (ver. 22, 23 ; Matt. 5 : 16 ; 15 : 8, 9, 14). 23. The inconsistent lives of many pro- fessed Christians aflford the strongest ar- guments to infidelity and the greatest cause of reproach of religion among un- believers (A'er. 23. 24 : Neh. 5:9). 24. No religious rite is of profit unless it tends to produce holiness of heart and life (ver, 25; Titus 1 : 16; Isa. 1 : 11-16). 25. OutAvard ordinances haA'e their place and value, but dependence on them for salvation Avill result in certain ruin (ver. 26, 27; Gal. 5:6; 6: 15). Ch. III.] ROMANS 51 3 kWHAT advantage then hath the Jew ; or what profit is there of circum- 2 cision ? Much every way : chiefly, be- cause that 1 unto them were committed 3 the oracles of God. For what if some did not believe ; ™ shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect? 3 WHAT then is the advantage of the Jew ? Or what is the profit of circum- 2 cision? Much every way; first, in- deed, that they were intrusted with the 3 oracles of God. For what if some dis- believed ? Shall their disbelief make 4 void the faithfulness of God ? Far be J 2 : 18 ; 9 : 4 : Ueut. 4:7,8; Acts 7 : 38. w 9 : 6; 2 Tim. 2 : 13. 26. The essence of religion is not in any j ritual, but in the loving service of an obedient heart (ver. 26-28 ; 14 : 17 : 1 Tim. : 1:5). I 27. Spiritual religion is of the first im- portance, and will manifest itself neces- sarily in outward religion (ver. 27 ; 10 : 9, 10). 28. The greatest boon of a man of God is a right heart, and the highest honor the praise that cometh from God (ver. 28 ; John 5: 44; 8: .54). CHAPTER III. In this chapter Paul completes his argument begun with 1 : 18, showing that Jews and Gentiles are alike under sin. He then ( ver. 21 ) proceeds to exhibit and discuss the doctrine of salvation by Christ, in whom there is revealed a righteousness from God to be received through faith, not earned by works. 1-20. Conclusion of the dis- cussion PEOYING THAT JEWS AND Gentiles are alike sinners and CONDEMNED, and hence in need of God's righteousness. The apostle an- swers certain objections which might be brought against the preceding view : First, That it takes away from God's chosen people all their advantages over Gentiles. Second, That it makes God unfaithful to his holy covenant. Third, That God cannot justly inflict punish- ment upon his chosen people, since their sinfulness redounds to his glory (ver. 1-8). He then resumes his argu- ment and proves from Scripture the universal sinfulness of men, both Jews and Gentiles. 1. VVhat then, in view of what he had said regarding Jews and Gentiles, circumcision and uncircunicision, is the advantage, or superiority, of the Jew ? Or, changing the question and {putting it in a different and more spe- cific form, IMiat is the profit, or benefit of circumcision? These questions would naturally arise in the mind of a Jew, and doubtless had been met and answered in Paul's own experience. He had admitted that circumcision did profit (2: 23). But how? To put Jew and Gentile both under condemna- tion and on a level before God was offensive to Jewish pride. The objec- tion that would at once arise he there- fore asks and answers. 2. Much every way — however you may look at it. This he admits is strictly true and needs no abatement. But it makes no difference in regard to the essential point of his argument. Chiefly — literally. First indeed, used absolutely as in 1 : 8, meaning. First of all, as much as to say, I need men- tion this only. There is no probability that Paul thought of enumerating other points. He, however, specifies some other advantages in 9 : 4, 5. He also implied certain advantages in 2 : 17-20 ; and discusses circumcision somewhat in 4 : 1 ff. For first of all, they had this advantage, in which the Jew especially gloried, that they were entrusted with the oracles of God — the diyine ictterances of his word ; the commands of the Mo- saic law and especially the Messianic promises, as is evident from the next verse (Heb. 5 : 12 ; 1 Peter 4 : 11 ; Acts 7 : 38, ou which compare note) , 3. This verse is differently punc- tuated by different critical editors, with- out substantially altering the sense. That used in the Common, Revised, and Bible Union versions is preferred here. For what, introduces a vigor- ous question, implying that nothing could be said to the contrary. For what if some did not believe? rather, if some disbelieved ; positively and actively exercised their unbelief in, and hence their rejection of, the prom- ises contained in the oracles of Go' 17 are in their ways: and ^the way of 18 peace have they not known : there is no fear of God before their eyes. no wise ; for we before charged, that both Jews and Greeks are all under 10 sin. As it is written, I'here is none righteous, no, not one ; 11 There is none that understands, There is none that seeks after God ; 12 They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofit- able ; There is none that does good, there is not so much as one ; 1:^ Their throat is an open sepulchre : With their tongues thuy have used deceit ; The iK)ison of asps is under their lips : 14 Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness ; 15 Their feet are swift to shed blood ; 16 Destruction and misery are in their ways ; 17 And the way of peace they have not known ; 18 There is no fear of God before their eyes. z Ver. 23 ; Gal. 3 : 22, a Ps. 53 : 1 ; Eph. 2:1-3; 1 John 1 : 8-10. b Prov. 1 : 16. c Isa. 57 : 21. nial. The Jews had the advantage of the Gentiles in respect to privilege (ver. 2) J but not ill regard to acceptance with God. For we have before proved, rather, for ice have before made the eharge, in presenting the proof of it, thathoth Jews (2 : 1-24) and Gen- tiles (i:is-32) are all under sin- under the power and slavery of sin (6: 16; 7 : 24; Gal. 3: 22). They wcre as a consequence exposed to condemnation. In this great, essential respect both Jews and Gentiles were alike. 10-18. The discussion brings the apostle back to his position tliat all are sinners. He had argued this from the general degeneracy of the race and the universal downward sinful tendency of both Jew and Gentile. He now turns to tlie Scripture proof that Jews as well as Gentiles are under sin, and that in this respect the former have no advan- tage over the latter. The quotations apply especially to the Jews (ver. 19) al- though not exchisively. Tliey are quo- ted freely, for the most part, from the Septuagint version. As it is written. Ver. 10 11, and 12 are from Ps, 14: 1-3, Tnere is here a general reference to all men, showing the nvirersal .nre of this universal wickedness. Quoted from Ps, 36 : 1. There is no fear, no reverence, of C»od — no respect for his authority, none which leads them to love and ohey him, and would have preserved them Ch. III.] KOMANS 55 19 Now we know that what things so- ever J the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law : that « every mouth may be stopped, and fall the world may become guilty before God. 20 Therefore' g by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his 19 Now we know that whatever the law says, it speaks to those under the law ; that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may be subject to con- 20 demnation before God. Because by works of law no flesh will be justified in e 1 : 20 ; 2:1: Job 9 : 2-4 ; Ezek. 16 : 63 : 1 Cor. 1 : 29. jr 9 : 31, 32 ; Acts 13 : 39 ; Gal. 3 : 10-13 ; Eph. 2 : 8, 9. / Gal. 3 : 10, 22. from their wicked conduct. (Compare Ps. Ill : 10.) These quotations prove from Scripture : ( 1 ) The universal sinful- ness of the race. (2) That one may be outwardly a Jew and yet a great sinner. (3) That great numbers and at times the nation as such have been in that condition, (see ver. 15-17, and compare isa. chap. 58 and 50. ) (4) The inevitable in- ference follows, That the Jew as such is not exempt from the penalty of God's broken law. 19. In this and the next verse Paul concludes his argument from the his- tory of the race, from observation, from human consciousness, and from Scrip- ture, that all men are sinners without excuse, justly exposed to the Divine condemnation and therefore in need of a righteousness from God. The conclu- sion would readily be admitted in re- spect to the Gentile ; but lest the Jew might say that such passages, as above quoted, are not applicable to him, Paul in a single sentence shoAvs that they are intended to apply to the Jews. Noav we know that whatever the law saith, it saith to them under the law, or within the sphere of the law. The laiv here includes the whole Old Testament, which is evident from the passages quoted. Such passages found in their own law and addressed to them must have reference to them. That — in order that — one of the pur- poses of the law, and the one applic- able at this point. Every mouth may be stopped — having nothing to answer before God. It was the Divine intention to take away every excuse from Jew as well as Gentile. And all the world may become guilty — may be under indictment, or subject to condemnation before God, to whom satisfaction for sin is due. All the world includes l)oth Jews and Gentiles. 20, Therefore — rather. Because, giving the reason for what he had just said in ver. 19, drawn from the whole discussion thus far : Because none will be justified on the ground of works* By the deeds of the law — better, by works of laio — by any w^orks, what- ever they may be, prescribed by any law, though the Mosaic law would be chiefly in mind. Latv here includes both the written law as quoted in ver. 10-18, and the law written on the con- science (2:14,15). Everyman is under the law in one or both of these re- spects. There is no distinction implied here between the ceremonial and moral law. It is law as a whole. The Scrip- tures make no such distinction. Neither are ivorks here to l^e limited to those done before regeneration, since " works of law " include good works of every kind, even of the greatest excellence. Those that are the fruit of a regenerate state are consequent upon justification, because they are the evidences of a living, saving, and justifying faith (James 2 : 18-22). There shall no flesh — with reference to our weakness, frailty, and mortality — no mortal man shall be justified — declared or ac- counted righteous in his sight, being such as God shall look upon as right- eous. This is a partial quotation from Ps. 143 : 2, " For in thy sight no one living shall be justified." {Justijied, see noteoni:i7.) There is no contradiction here between Paul and James (2 : 22-25). Paul treats of justification as the act of God (8 : 22) and as God looks upon it ; James treats of it as it is manifested and evidenced to men by consequent works. Paul looks at the ground of justification which is not of works but through faith ; James, at the result in the ex- perience of the individual. James does not combat a justification by a living faith which shows itself by works, but a nominal faith, Avhich being without works is dead. To be justified by the works of the law means more than obe- dience to the law, for God looks upon the heart (1 Sam. le : 7). Both heart and life must from the beginning be per- fectly conformed to the holy law of 56 ROMANS [Ch. III. sight : for ^ by the law is the knowledge of sin. TJie remedy. God 's righteousness freely given to the believer in Christ, as to believers in former times. 21 BUT now 'the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, ''being witnessed by the Law 'and the Proph- 22 ets; even the righteousness of God his sight ; for through law is knowl- 21 edge of sin. But now, apart from law, a righteousness of God has been mani- fested, being witnessed by the law and 22 the prophets ; even a righteousness of ft 7 : 7-9. J 1 : 17 ; 10 : 3, 4. k Gen. 15 : 6 ; John 5 : 46. M : 2 ; Jcr. 23 : 5, 6 ; Dan. 9 : 24. God. (See note on 2 : 13.) But Paul is nOt speaking concerning the justification of innocent beings like our first parents before the fall, but of men as they actually are, of sinners, as is evident from what follows : For by, or through, the law Cometh a full knowledge of sin — one comes to know his true char- acter and condition as a sinner by the law. Its office and effect is to convince of sin ; pardon, the spirit of obedience, and consequent peace, it cannot give. Paul could speak regarding this from experience, for he says (7 : 7), "I had not known sin except through law"; and "the law has become our school- master," or tutor, "unto Christ, that we may be justified by faith " (Gai. 3 : 24). And in 1 Tim. 1 : 8-10 he describes the functions of the law : That its lawful use is good, but that it exists not for righteous men, but for sinners. Such being the office of the laAv^ and its effect upon fallen men, it is evident that it cannot be a ground of their justifica- tion. It rather condemns, and cuts off all hope; for it is written, "Cursed is every one that continues not in all the things written in the book of the law, to do them" (Gal.3:10). 21-31. Having shown that all men are sinners and in need of God's right- eousness, Paul proceeds to present the WAY OF SALVATION THROUGH FAITH IN Christ in the following respects : Its nature, not of works but tlirough faith; offered and adapted to all men alike ; gratuitous. Its ground, the propitia- tory sacrifice and redemption which is in Jesus Christ. Its object, to enal>le a righteous G(td to pardon and save sin- ners. Its results, excludes boasting; presents (iod exercising justifying mercy to botli Jews and Gentiles; es- tablishing, not subverting, the law. 21. But now, since man has no righteousness of his own under law, without the law, apart from law, without any connection or dependence on law, "whether Mosaic or natural, there is now under the go.spel mani- fested, fully and plainly made known, (( righteousness of God. Of which God is the Author, as in 1 : 17, which is from him and which he imparts. See note on 1 : 17, espe- cially that (2) on "righteousness." This righteousness was manifested in and through Jesus Christ, Avho is " the Lord our righteousness" (Jer. 23 : 6). Being not only perfectly innocent (Jobn 8 : i^), butpOSitivelyholy (John7:18;7:26), he was able by his voluntary and holy obedience, both in living and in suffer- ing even unto death, to meet all the demands of God's holy law (Rom. 5: 19 ; Phil. 2:8; Heb. 5:8). Activcly and pas- sively, in character and life, he ex- hibited all that moral excellence which God and his law requires. His right- eousness was spotless, perfect, and com- plete (Heb. 9 : 14; 1 Peter 1 : 19 ; Rev. 5 : 6-14). Being witnessed, or testified to, by the law and the prophets — the Old Testament Scriptures ( Gen. 3 : 15 ; Exod. 34 : 6, 7 ; Ps. 32 : 1, 2 ; 103 : 8, 9, 10 ; Isa. 53 : 5, 11 ; Jer. 31 : 34). See also the illustrations from Abraham and David (4:6, 13). There was also the continual testimony of the expiatory sacrifices in the Okl Testa- ment. It was therefore not a new doc- trine, but one which had been gleaming through the types and shadows of the law, and the brief and indistinct utter- ances of the prophets. Hence the phrase, literally, has been manifested, is eminently suitable. That which was previously but dimly and partially seen has now been made plain fully and com- pletely in the gospel. 22. Even a righteousness of God. In the preceding verse Paul teaches that this righteouisiness is not attained by works of law ; in this verse, that it is attained through faith in Christ. Its emphatic repetition joins it Ch. III.] roma:ns 57 which is ™ by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe : 23 (for 1 there is no difference: for "all have sinned, and come short of the 24 glory of God;) being justitied freely p by his grace i through the redemption 25 that is in Christ Jesus : whom God hath God through faith in Jesus Christ, to all that believe ; for there is no dis- 23 tinction ; for all have sinned, and fall 24 short of the glory of God; being justi- fied freely by his grace, through the re- 25 demption that is in Christ Jesus ; whom m Chap. 4 ; 5 : 1. n Gal. 3 : 28. o See refs. 1 Kings 8 : 46. p b : 16-19 ; Kph. 2:7-9; Titus 3 q Matt. 20 : 28 ; Col. 1 : 14 ; Heb. 9 : 12. with and emphasizes faith. By, rather, through faith in Jesus Christ. It is through faith as the medium ; or faitli may be regarded as the appropriating organ through which the righteousness is received. Through faith also we re- ceive Christ and become united with him; Christ becomes ours Avith his atonement and righteousness. " Salva- tion comes not because our faith saves us, but because it links us to the Christ who saves; and belie\'ing is the link. There is no more merit in it than in the beggar's stretching forth his hand to re- ceive the offered purse, or the drown- ing man's grasping the rope that is thrown to him" (Steoxg's "Theol- ogy/' P- 481;. Unto all and upon all — extending to all and coming upon all that believe. But some of the old- est and best manuscripts read simply, unto all that believe. A reason is given for what he had just said : For there is no difference or distinction in this respect between Jews and Gentiles (10 : 12), for they are all alike con- demned, and the one has no moral su- periority over the other, 23. Further reason for the above : For all have sinned — more exactly, For all sinned. A historic fact of the past, including the first sin in the gar- den and the sinful disposition and acts flowing out of it. All are sinners. The preceding arguments had shown this. And come short, do come short con- tinually, of the glory of God. This is differently interpreted. Some regard it as the glory Mhich belongs to God and which he imparts to the believer. Similar in construction to " righteousness of God " (i : i7; 3 : 21). Others suppose it to mean that all are failing to receive the approbation of God — the praise and honor which he bestows (John 5:44; 12:43). But it seems better to take it to mean in re- spect to the glory of God — that glory which is due to him : They all do fail of glorifying God. (Compare! : 21.) " Bc- cause, knowing God they glorified him not as God." ALso the rebuke of Bel- shazzar, "And the God in whose hand thy breath is . . . hast thou not glori- fied" (I>an. 5 : 25), 24. Being justified — declared or accounted righteous — grammatically connected with all (ver. 23), but by a well- known usage referring back in thought to ver. 22, to those who through faith receive God's righteousness (ver. 22). The statement of ver. 23, that all are sin- ners and are failing continually of ren- dering to God the glory that is his due, makes the gratuitous justification of this verse stand out the more promi- nently. Freely — gratuitously. By or through his grace adds greater in- tensity to the expres.sion. They are justified, as a free gift, without any equivalent on their part in the exercise of his grace toward the undeserving, being merely an act of mercy. This is a hard thing for men in their sins and self-righteousness to accept. Through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus. JRedemjition is deliverance by the payment of a ransom (Job 33 : 24; isa. 35: 10:1 Tim. 2: 6), and in the New Testa- ment is applied to deliverance from the guilt of sin (Eph. 1:7: Col. 1 : 14), from the curse of the law (Gai. 3 : i3; 4 : 5), and from the wrath of God (5:9; 1 Thess. 1 : 10 ; 5:9). It also includes deliverance from the power, dominion, and consequences of sin (Titus 2 : 14; 1 Peter 1 : 18), including the redemption of the body (s : 23). This redemption is said to be?» Jesus Christ, or according to a better reading, in Christ Jesus, in his person as the Mes- siah — the redeeming act being per- formed by him personally in what he did and suffered. It is entirely in Christ and in no other. All human agency is excluded. Ju.stification is through or by means of this redemption in Christ Jesus. (See Andrew Ful- ler's "Works," Vol. I., p. 276 ff. Three Sermons on Justification. ) 25. miom God set forth for himself 58 ROMANS [Ch. III. set forth 'lobe a propitiation ^ through faith ill his blood, to declare his right- God set forth as a proxjitiatioii, through faith, in his blood, for the exhibition of r Lev. 16 : 15, 16 ; 1 John 2:2; 4 : 10. 8 John 6 : 53-58 ; Col. 1 : 20. as it were into public view. The ex- pression includes the idea that it was his oimi, his own Son, he set forth, es- pecially in his death, his crucifixion. To be, or as, a propitiation, in- volving the idea oi'dppeasing, expiating. In the Septuagint (Kxod. 25 : 18, etc.) and in Heb. 9 : 5, it is applied to the cover of the ark of the covenant in the Holy of Holies, which was sprinkled with the blood of the expiatory victim on the day of the atonement, signifying that the life of the people, the loss of which they had merited on account of their sins, was offered to God in the blood as the life of the victim, and that thus God was appeased and their sins expiated. Hence it was called the expiatory — the lid of expiation, or as translated in our version, the inercy seat, the place of mercy. Some transfer this meaning to this passage : That Christ, besprinkled with his own blood, was truly that which this lid of expiation typified, namely, the Atoner and Mediator. Hodge ob- jects to this meaning of the word, be- cause " Christ is nowliere else called the mercy seat," and because " it is common to speak of the blood of a sacrifice, but not of the blood of the mercy seat." It may also be added that the mercy- seat is hidden rather than set forth. Otliers therefore with good reason take the word to mean propitiatory sacrifice. It is strictly an adjective, meaning propitiatory, and implies some noun as sacrifice or offering understood, the con- nection suggesting the sense. Meyer refers to the analogous terms used, where offering is understood, as the word pertaining to thanks used for thank-offering, etc. Or if used as a noun it would very naturally mean a victim of expiation. The context sug- gests the idea of an atoning sacrifice by the words "in his blood" (uv. n . 11). This view accords with the fact that the Mosaic sacrifices were typical of Christ (1 Cor. 5:7; Heb. 10 : I-IO), aiul that he WaS styled by .John "the Laml) of God that takes away the sin of the world " (.loi.n 1 : 29), and that the Old Testament prophecies foretold a suffering Messiah who should make an atonement for the sins of the world (l-^a. 53 : 4-12; nan. 9 : 24-26; Zech. 13 : 1 ff.; Ps. 16 : 22, 40 ; Luke 24 : 26, 27, 46, etc.). Christ also is expressly declared to be a sacrifice and offering unto God for a sweet-smelling savor (Eph. 5:2), and he is also said to have offered himself without spot or blemish unto God (Heb. 9 : 14), TMs vicw is also Confirmed by the use of its kindred words else- where in the New Testament. Thus the verb from which it is derived means to appease, to j^i'opitiate. In Heb. 2 : 17 it is correctly translated in the Revised and the Bible Union versions, to make propitiation ; and in Luke 18 : 13, Be merciful or he propitiated ; and in the Septuagint it is used six times with the same essential meaning. So also its kindred noun derived from the above verb, means an appeasing, a propitiat- ing, and is used of an expiatory sacri- fice in 2 Mace. 3 : 33 ; and of Christ as a propitiation of our sins in 1 John 2:2; 4 : 10. Notice that while it is said that Christ offered himself, that it was God who gave and sent his Son (John 3 : le, n), and the Son voluntarily obeyed (Heb. 10:5-8). And also that here Paul says not offered, but whom God set forth, as a propitiatory sacrifice. Through faith — connected most naturally with propitiation. Christ the propitiatory sacrifice becomes such to the believer through faith. In, or by, his blood — by means of his blood, meaning his life which he offered to God for the sins of men (Oeut. 12 : 23; Heb. 9 : 22). Observe here that there was some- thing in God to be propitiated, and that Christ by his sacrifice made the propi- tiation. The holy wrath of God was aroused against sin and the sinner (l : 18; 5 : 9; Ps. 7 : 11 : Gal. 3 : 13), which WaS removed by the death of Christ. The Bible everywhere represents sin as abominable in God's sight. There is a holy displeasure of God superadded to the penalties of the law (2 : 4, 5, 8, 9; 3:5; Kph. 5:6; CoL 3:6:1 Thcss. 2 : 16). It is but the natural outworkings of God's holi- ness and justice against sin. Christ so satisfies these as to deliver us from wrath (Rom. 5 :9; 1 Thess. 1 : 10; 5 :9). It should also be noted that it was not God offer- ing up a propitiatory sacrifice to him- self, but that it was the second Adam Ch. III.] EOMANS 59 eousness *for the remission of "sins that are past, through the forbearance 26 of God ; to declare, / say, at this time his righteousness : ^ that he might be just, and the justiher of him which be- lieveth in Jesus. his righteousness, because of the pass- ing over of the sins formerly commit- 26 ted in the forbearance of God ; for the exhibition of his righteousness in this present time, that he may be righteous, and the justitier of him who believes in Jesus. ( Acts 13 : 38, 39. M Acts 17 : 30 ; Heb. 9 : 15. I Isa. 42 : 21. representing the race (i Tim. 2 :5, 6; Phii. 2 : 7, 8; 1 Cor. 15 : 22, 45). To declare— /or /Ae exhibition; that is, in order to exhibit his righteous- ness. His holiness, justice, liatred of sin, and his infinite love are all exhib- ited, as nowhere else, in the sacrificial offering of his son; especially his "ju- dicial righteousness in both its aspects, of sin-condemning and sin-forgiving righteousness ' ' ( SCH AFF ) . In order to show that his righteousness was main- tained while he remitted the penalty of violated law. For the remission, etc. The rest of this verse constitutes one clause, and is better rendered : Be- cause of the passing over (compare over- looked (Acts 17 : 30) ; obscrvc also that the w^ord does not mean remissioyi) of the sins previously committed (before the expiatory death of Christ) in the long- suffering of God — while God in his long-suffering forbore to inflict punish- ment. For four thousand years God had tolerated sin and sinners. (Comp. Acts 14:16.) His liolincss and justice w^ere in danger of being lost sight of, and the conception of them obscured (2:2; 2 Peter 3 : 3, 4). The Same coiisciencc also that condemned the sin would con- demn the judge who should remit the penalty. There was a necessity there- fore for a solemn manifestation of God's righteousness as exhibited in the expia- tory death of Christ. Of the benefits which godly men of old derived from looking forward to a coming Sa^aour Paul is not now speaking. He is show- ing the need of displaying God's right- eousness. 26. Paul repeats for another purpose a thought of tlie preceding verse. To declare, I say, etc. P>etter, For the exhibition of his righteousness at this present time, in this critical period of the world's history under the gospel. At this presoit time is emphatic, and contrasted with the passing over of sins preWously committed (ver. 25). Then there was a passing over and a forbeai'- ance in punishment; now, a full for- giveness through the atoning sacrifice, which if rejected would bring swift de- struction (.A.cts 13 : 40, 41). Exhibition of his righteousness in the Divine character — see on preceding verse. We must not separate the justice and mercy of God ; nor suppose that any of his attributes are antagonistic. His holiness, justice, mercy, and love, are all in perfect har- mony, and all made conspicuous in the suflTering and death of Christ. In this sacrifice Christ was exhibited as well pleasing and acceptable to God (John 10 : 17, 18) , as voluntarily making it on his part (Heb. 10 : 5-7), as sustaining a twofold relation to God and man (iTim. 2:5, 6; Phil. 2:6ff.), and both tlicsc rela- tions were conspicuous in his life (JoUa 1 : 14)^ in his sufferings and death (Matt. 27 : 50-54)^ and in his resurrection (i:4: 4: 25; Acts 13 : 33)^ and Still COllSpicUOUS in his exaltation (ActsS :31; PMI. 2 :9-ll: Rev. 5:9-14). Tlius was God honored as much as if his holy displeasure and the penalty of his law had been visited on the sinner himself. The object or end in view of all this ("whom God set forth as a propitia- tion," etc.), is now stated: That he might be just and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. Or more exactly, in order that he may him- self be righteous (really and manifestly so) and making him righteous who is of faith in Jesus. A difficulty here is that there is no single word in English to render the word translated justify corresponding Avith the word righteous. " We have here the greatest paradox of the gospel ; for in tlie law God is seen just and condemning; in the gospel as being himself just and justifying the sinner" _ (Bengel). In tlie act of justification the righteousness of Christ ( ver. 21 ) is accouutcd to the believer, so that he is pardoned and treated as if he had never sinned. Through faith this rigliteousness is accepted and the soul becomes united with Christ (ver. 22), in- 60 ROMANS [Ch. III. 27 y Where is boasting then ? It is ex- cluded. By what law? Of works? 28 »Nay : but by the law of faith. There- fore we conclude that a man is jasti- tied by faith without the deeds of the law. 29 Js he the God of the Jews only ? Is he not also of the Gentiles? "Yes, of 30 the Gentiles also : seeing ^ it is one God which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith. 27 Where then is the glorying? It is excluded. By what kind of law ? Of works? Nay ; but by a law of faith. 28 For we reckon that a man is justified 29 by faith apart from works of law. Or is God the God of Jews only? Is he not also of Gentiles ? Yes, of Gentiles 30 also ; since God is one, who will justify the circumcision by faith, and the un- 31 circumcision through faith. Do we y 1 Cor. 1 : 29-31. z 9 : 32 ; Gal. 2 : 16. a 9 : 24-26 ; Mai. 1 : 11 ; Eph. 3:6. b Gal. 3 : 28 ; 5:6. vol ving regeneration and adoption (8: 15- 18: 2 Cor. 5 : 17) and a partaking of the Di- vine nature (2 Peter 1:4; Heb. 12 : 10). Jus- tification includes both the forgiveness of sins and restoration to the Divine favor. But through faith, by virtue of union with Christ, this righteousness is received in growth in grace and sanc- tification. Being made free from sin," that is, justified, "ye have your fruit unto holiness," that is, unto sanc- tification (6 : 23 ; see on 1 : 17 and 3 : 24). This passage (ver. 25, 26) is one of the richest in doctrinal instruction in all Paul's writings. Nowhere else is he, or any other writer in the New Testament, .so full or so explicit on the atoning efficacy of Christ's death. Nowhere else is the great question of the ages, which hu- man wisdom never solved, so clearly answered, "How can man be just with God ? " (Job 9 : 2.) What consolation has this brought to troubled and believing hearts. On reading it," says Cow- per, "I immediately received power to believe. . . I saw the complete suf- ficiency of the expiation which Christ had wrought for my pardon and justifi- cation. . . My eyes filled with tears, transports choked my utterance. I could only look up to heaven in silent fear, overflowing with love and won- der." 27. Paul now draws liis conclusions in a number of spirited questions and answers. Where is the boasting then? that is, of the Jew (2:17; 3: 19. See hclow on ver. 29). Where? It is not to be found or seen, so confident is Paul in the strength of his po.sition. It is excluded. The gospel plan of redemption leaves no ground of boast- ing. How then is it exchided? How can its spirit be suppressed ? By what kind nf^ law ? By a law of works ? one which demands works as a ground of merit? Nay ; emphatically ; for that would lead to self- righteousness. But by a law of faith — a principle or rule which requires faith. Only thus will a person learn to glory in the Lord and not in self (Kph. 2 :8, 9). But Paul only discarded legal works; he held as strongly as James to the works which are evidences of a living faith, the fruit in a Christian life ( Eph. 2 : 10 ; Titus 3:8). 28. Therefore, in view of what has just l>een said, and confirmatory of it, w'e conclude, rather, ice reckon or hold, that a man is justified, or ac- counted righteous, by faith, apart from tcorks of hnc, as a ground of accept- ance witll God. (See ou ver. 20, 21.) 29. Is he the God, etc. Eather, Or, if this statement (ver. 28) is doubted or not admitted, is God the God of Jeics only f "If righteousness comes through works of law, as the Jews only had the law, the absurd conclu.sion follows that he was the God of the Jews only" (Boise). Thus this verse and the next strikingly confirm the statement in ver. 28. Is he not also of Gentiles ? The form of the question in the original anticipates an affirmative answer. Yes, of Gevtiles also. This authori- tative as-sertion is founded on numer- ous passages in the Old Testament (Gen. 12 : 3 ; Ps. 2 : 8 ; 82 : 8 ; Tsa. 49 : 5-7, etc.) . 30. The statement of this verse, grounded on the unity of God, isclo.sely connected with the preceding verse. Seeing — sivce God is one, a doctrine firmly held by the Jews. Hence he must be God of l)oth Jews and Gen- tiles, or the absurd conclusion would follow that Gentiles had no God ! As there is one God of all, so there is ])ut one way of ju.stification for all. Who icill justify the circumcision by, or out of, faith, and the uncircum- cision through the faith, tlie very same faith as that l)y which the Jew is Ch. III.] KOMANS 61 31 Do we then "make void the law through faith ? God forbid establish the law. yea, <» we then make void law through faith Far be it ! Yea, we establish law. c Gal. 3 : 17-19. d 7 : 7-14 ; 8 : 4. justified, or accounted as righteous. Most take by and through as equivalent in meaning. By or out of may point rather to faith as the source by which Jews were justified and thus made truly the .sons of Abraham (Gai.3:6, -), their circumcision being but an outward sign or seal of that faith (*:ii). Through may point to faith as the means or me- dium by which others received the ben- efits of justification, independent of any outward sign or any ancient cove- nant. 31. This verse forms the conclusion of what precedes, and a transition to the discussion in the next chapter. An objection would arise in the minds of many, as doubtless it had in Paul's own experience, that such a gratuitous jus- tification by faith alone, would do away with the ol)ligations of the law. Do we then make void the law, make it inoperative and useless, through faith ? God forbid. Away the thought ! Impossible ! It is not to be once named. Yea, we establish the law. But how? (1) God's dis- pleasure against sin and his justice re- ceive their highest manifestation on Calvary and in the go.spel. (2) Through the gospel a spirit of obedience to the Divine will is produced in man, and thus the law which represents the will of God is established. (.3) Christ also honored it and gave it a perfect obedi- ence. He came not to destroy it, but to fulfill it. (4) The law as illustrated in Abraham {i-^), involved the same principle of faith, and is therefore con- firmed thereby. Practical Remarks. 1. The advantages of belonging to the church, or of living in a Christian com- munity, are many, and the responsibility is great (ver. 1 ; Deut. 4:7-9; Ps. 147 : 19, 20). 2. Since the Bible is such a boon to any people, how imix)rtant to give it to all na- tions (ver. 2 ; Ps. 119 : 97-iai ; Rev. 22 : 6, 7, 10). 3. God is faithful to his promises ; and it is man's fault if he fails of its bless- ! ings (ver. ?,, 4 ; 2 Tim. 2 : 11-1.3 ; 1 John I 1:9). ' 4. It is a mark of true piety to justify j God rather than ourselves (ver. 4; Job I 42 : 5, 6). ry. That God makes the Avrath of man to praise him does not lessen the guilt of the sinner (ver. 5; Ps. 76:7-10; Prov. I 9 : 12). I 6. The final judgment will be impartial I and founded in truth and righteousness (ver. 6 ; Ps. 72 : 2 ; Rev. 19 : 2). 7. Sinners may comfort themselves by false reasonings about God, but they can- not thereby escape condemnation and punishment (ver. 7 ; Exod. 34 : 7). 8. That practice cannot be good, nor that doctrine true, whose tendency is im- moral (ver. 8; Matt. 7:16-20; 1 Cor. 15 : 33). 9. Whatever advantages the people of Christian countries may have over the heathen, all are alike sinners (ver. 9, 23 ; 1 Kings 8 : 46). 10. Paul regarded the Old Testament as the word of God and an ultimate stand- ard of appeal (ver. 10-18; 2 Tim. 3 : 16). 11. The Bible's description of the hu- man heart and life before Christ is equally true at the present day (ver. 10-18 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 1, 2; 2 Peter 3 : 3). 12. The Bible teaches explicitly human depra\'ity, involving the tongue, month, I lips, feet, the entire body (ver. 10-18 ; Jer. 17 : 9; James 3:6). 13. The law was intended neither to jus- tify nor sanctify. It gives no hope of sal- vation ; but only speaks condemnation to the sinner (ver. 19, 20 ; Gal. 3 : 22). 14. Con\iction of sin and a feeling that if we are saved it must be by other merit and power than our own, are a needed preparation for the reception of the gos- pel (ver. 20; Gal. 3 : 23, 24). 15. The doctrine of salvation by grace through faith is a doctrine of the Old Tes- tament as well as the New (ver. 21 ; Hab. 2:4; Isa. 28 : 16; Zech. 4 : 7). 16. Christ has wrought out a perfect righteousness by his obedience unto death, 62 ROMANS [Ch. IV 4 WHAT shall we then say that * Abra- ham our father, ^as pertaining to the flesh, hath found ? WHAT then shall we say that Abra- ham, our forefather according to the « Isa. 51 : 2 ; Matt. 3 : 9. / Phil. 3 : 3, 4. which is accounted to the believer in jus- tification, and of which by a personal union with Christ, the believer becomes partaker in sanctilication (ver. 21, 22; Gal. 2 : 16, 20 ; Phil. 1 : 11 ; Rev. 19 : 8). 17. The Bible teaches that all men are sinners. Sin robs God of his glory, and takes for self that which belongs to God (ver. 23 ; 5 : 12 ; Mai. 1:6; Gal. 3 : 22). 18. Justification is an act of grace on God's part, gratuitously exercised toward men, and made available by means of the ransom which Christ personally paid for us (ver. 24; Gal. 4 : 4, 5). 19. All human agency is excluded in justification. It is an act of God solely be- cause of what Christ has done for us (ver. 24-26; 8:33; Phil. 1:8, 9; Eph 2:8). 20. In the atonement Christ is set forth as expiating sin and satisfying the justice and holiness of God (ver. 25, 26; Heb. 9: 14). 21. The death of Christ displays and vindicates the righteous character and perfections of God, in his treatment of sinners, both in the former dispensation and in the present (ver. 2-5, 26). 22. Christ obeyed and suffered in our stead in order that we might through him be pardoned and saved (ver. 22-26 ; 4 : 25). 23. It was only as Christ was set forth as a propitiation that God could be right- eous in exercising justifying mercy (ver. 26; Matt. 26 : 39,42). 24. Both justification and sanctification are of God. The former is God's gracious act toward us ; the latter is what he gra- ciovLsly does within us (ver. 22-26; John 17 : 17). 25. All the attributes of God were in glorious harmony in ])roviding and ac- complishing the great work of redemp- tion (ver 22-26, 31 ; Ps. 10, 11). 26. Gospel jastification tends to humble men and exalt God (ver. 27, 28; 1 Cor. 1 : 31). 27. God is the universal Father and all men are brethren in the flesh (ver. 29: Acts 17 :28, 29). 28. Justification by faith is without par- tiality, and open to all (ver. 30; Mai. 1 : 11). 29. The law, in its spiritual character and righteous requirements, abides, and is in perfect harmony with the gospel (ver. 31; Mark 12 : 28-34). CHAPTER IV. In this chapter we have the expand- ing of the truth brought to view in the last verse of the preceding chap- ter. The law and the gospel are in per- fect accord. The former is confirmed by the latter. The doctrine of salva- tion by grace through faith is the same in both ; but it finds its highest devel- opment in the gospel through Jesus Christ. 1-25. The doctrine of salva- tion BY GRACE THROrGH JUSTIFICA- TION BY FAITH ILLUSTRATED AND CONFIRMED FROM THE OLD TESTA- MENT. Abraham justified by faith (ver. 1-5). David recognized a righteous- ness apart from works (ver. 6-8). This faith and this reckoned righteousness of justification in Abraham preceded circumcision (ver. 9-13). Circumcision a sign and a seal of the righteousness of Abraham's faith. Through the right- eousness of faith also Abraham was the heir of the world (ver. 13-22), which now may also be ours. 1. Paul anticipates an objection which would naturally arise in the mind of a Jew, and which he had felt in his own experience : If sucli a view be correct, What shall we then say that Abraham onr forefath er hath found ? obtained at^to the flesh .?— as to external observances afiecting the body only, within the sphere of works, such as circumcision, ablutions, fast- ings, etc., on wliich the Jew laid so much stress (G"'- e ■ i'-': p''"- ^ : *■ 5). Some witli the Revised version read, our fore- father according to the flesh hath found —what benefit hath lie gained? Otliers without sufficient reason omit hath found, and translate, What then shali we say of Abraham our forefather? The general sense of these various read- Ch. IV.] ROMANS 63 2 For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory. But 3 not before God ; for what saith the Scripture? s Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for right- 4 eousness. Now •» to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, 5 but of debt ; but ' to him that worketh not, but belie veth on him that justifi- eth the ungodly, ^ his faith is counted for righteousness. 2 flesh, has found ? For if Abraham was justified by works, he has ground of glo- 3 rying ; but not towards God. For what says the Scripture ? And Abraham be- lieved God, and it was reckoned to 4 him for righteousness. Now to him that works, the reward is not reckoned 5 as of grace, but as of debt. But to him that works not, but believes on him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is 6 reckoned for righteousness. As also gr Gal. 3:6; James 2 : 23. A 11 : 6. I Ver. 24 ; 3 : 22. A; Ver. 3. ings is nearly the same. The answer implied to the question is, Nothing as regards righteousness and justification. To the Jew Abraham was the highest authority ; and this question of the first importance. 2. A negative answer to the preceding question being implied, For introduces tiie reason for this answer. This verse and the next atford a good illustration of Paul's brief elliptical style, which makes the interpretation difficult. For if Abraham was justified, or ac- counted righteous, by works he hath ground of glorying and of boasting — with an evident allusion to 3 : 27. But nothefore^ or toivard, God. Some in- terpret : In that case he has occasion of glorying, not toward God, but only to- ward himself. Even then whatever merit he may have in the sight of men, he has no ground of boasting before an infinitely holy God. But the most nat- ural and satisfactory explanation seems to be : For if Abraham was justified by works, as the Jews commonly supposed, he would have ground of boasting; but he has no such ground before or toward God ; and therefore he was not justified by works ; for what saith the Scripture, etc. This is the view of Cal- vin and Hodge. 3. For introduces the proof of the negative assertion implied above. For what saith the Scripture in regard to the ground of Abraham's justifica- tion? Abraham believed God, and it Avas counted, or reckoned, to him for righteousness (Gai.3:6; James 2: 23). Quotcd from Gcn 15 : 6, from the Septuagint. Believed is era- I)hatic, and thus Abraham's faith is dis- tinguished from works, and merit on his part is excluded. Abraham's faith being reckoned to him for righteousness implies that he was justified, or ac- counted righteous and treated as such. ( Compare 2 : 26 ; 9 : 8 ; 8 : 36. ) Abraham's faith included both his filial trust in God, and his belief in God's promise (Gen. 15 : 5, 6). How stroug it was may be learned from ver. 18 and from Gen. 12 : 1-4 and Heb. 11 : 8-10. At this point it was only necessary to Paul's argument to contrast faith and works ; and to show that as the gospel makes known a righteousness by faith apart from works, so Abraham in like man- ner obtained righteousness by faith apart from works. From other parts of Scripture we learn that Abraham's faith in God rested on the Promised Seed (Gal. 3:8), and the promises which were seen from afar (Johns : 56; Heb. 11 : 13). See closing note on ver. 10. 4, 5. These two verses illustrate the essential difference between a reward of works, and a favor bestowed without any equivalent in return. They illus- trate and confirm ver. 3. Now to him that worketh — for wages or hire. This is the natural meaning, as shown by the use of the word rew^ard, the pay of a hireling. To such the pay is not reckoned as a matter of grace or favor, brit as of debt. But to him, who like Abraham, ivorketh not, as a hireling for pay, but renouncing all claim to reward and merit, believeth on him wAo justifieth, or accounts the ungodly as righteous, to such a one, his faith is reckoned for righteous- ness, and necessarily gratuitous, (see on ver. 3.) Then he is no longer regarded as ungodly but reconciled (5 : lo), regen- erated and adopted into God's family (8:15. See on 3: 26). Faith is here pre- sented as entirely separate from works, and as opposed to all trust in works, not as supplementing defective works (11:6). The final statement of ver. 5 prepares the way for the argument in the next verse. 6. David is quoted an authority (A iiUMANS [Ch. IV. 6 Even a.s David also clescril)ctli the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth rij^hteousness ' without 7 works, mi/i/ui, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins 8 are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not iraimte sin. 9 ™ Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision onli/, or upon the un- circumcision also? "For we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. 10 How was it tlien reckoned ; when he was in circumcision, or in uncircum- David speaks of the happiness of the man, t(j whom God reckons righteous- ness, apart from works. 7 Happy they, whose iniquities have been forgiven. And whose sins have been covered ; 8 Happy the man to whom the Lord will not reckon sin ! 9 Comes this happiness then on the cir- cumcision, or also on the uncircumci- sion ? For we say. Faith was reckoned 10 to Abraham for righteousness. How then was it reckoned ? When he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision ? i 3 : 20, 21, 27. m 3 : 29, 30. n Ver. 3. among the Jews hardly second to Abra- ham, and especially revered for his Messianic relations a n d predictions (Ps. 2 :2; Matt. 1: 1). Eveil SLfi David describeth — t^peaks or a.s.sxvte. His testimony is appealed to as a proof and in elucidation of a righteousness apart from works. Just as David speaks of the blessedness of, or ujyon, the man unto Avhoni God imputeth, or /•«• /.one/ /*, righteousness without works, aj}art from tvorks. The word rendered blessedness occurs in the New Testament only three times (here, ver. 9, and Gal. 4: 15) J and mcans « decla- ration of blessedytessor happiness. Thus David utters a declaration of hajjpiness upon the man. " Nearly equivalent to saying, congratulates the man" etc. (Boise). 7, 8. The quotation is from the Septuagint (ps. 32:1,2). Blessed, or Happy , they whose iniquities ?/yre (and are) forgiven, and whose sins irere (and are) covered completely. This implies man's absolute need of for- giveness, and that he could in nowise demand justice at God's hands (.ioh9: 2.3). Blessed, or Happy, the man to whom the Lord will in no irise impute, rather, reckon, sin. This im- plies that his only hope is in God's for- oearing to l)ring him into judgment — to account sin against him. The two passages regarding; Abraham and David in a measure supjtlcment each other. Justification is the central point (vir. 5), Gratuitously jx-rfonned through faith and a reckoned righteousness are the jxiints brought to view in the case of Abraham. Tiie full and gracious for- giveness of sins is made prominent in the words of David. It is implied, and so Paul affirms, that to such a one righteousness is reckoned apart from works (ver. 6). It lias been noted that in the Hebrew of the quotation from David there are three different words used to express sin. Thus "sin is viewed as a wrong against God (trans- gression) which needs iohe forgiven, as a loathsome thing (sin) which needs to be covered, and as a crime (iniquity) which needs to be avenged unless some satisfaction is rendered to justice ; or to express substantially the same dis- tinctions more briefly, sin is repre- sented as an offense against God's maj- esty, his purity, and his justice" (A. N. Aenold, "Am. Com."). (seePs. 32: 1,2.) 9. Paul proceeds to prove from Abra- ham's case that circumcision is not a necessary condition of that happy state in which righteousness is reckoned to a believer, implying his justification. Having shown how Abraham was ac- counted righteous (ver. 3-5), and given the testimony of David to the same effect, the question naturally arises: Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? This is not the language of a supposed objector, but rather Paul's statement of the point in question. No direct an- swer is given, but it is implied : Upon the circumcision also; for Ave say, etc. On this blessedness. (See on ver. 6.) For begins the discu.ssion, repeating the Scripture statement of ver. 3 as a fundamental starting point. In the words, we say, Paul assumes the as- sent of the reader to this position. (Set- on ver. 3.) 10. How, under what circum- stances, was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision. Ch. IV.] ROMANS 65 cision? Not in circumcision, but in 11 uncircumcision. And oJie received the sign of circumcision, Pa seal of ithe righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised : that •• he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circum- cised ; that righteousness might be im- 12 puted unto them also : and the father of circumcision ^ to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised. Not in circumcision, but in uncircum- 11 cision. And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteous- ness of the faith which he had while in uncircumcision ; that he might be father of all that believe while in un- circumcision, that the righteousness 12 might be reckoned to them also ; and father of circumcision to those who not only are of the circumcision, but who also walk in the steps of the faith of ovu" father Abraham, which he had while in uncircvimcision. Gen. 17 : 10, 11. p 2 Cor. 1 : 22 ; Eph. 1 : 13, 14. q Phil. 3:9. r Luke 19 : 9 ; Gal. 3 : 7. 9 : 6, 7. or in uncircumcision? This was a question of so great importance to the Jew, that a direct question and a positive answer are given. Not in circumcision, but in uncircum- cision. From a comparison of Gen. 15 : 6 ; 16:16; 17 : 13, it appears that it was some months before the birth of Ishmael that the faith of Abraham was counted to him for righteousness, that Abraham was eighty-six years old when Ishmael Avas born, and ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised. Thus this great spiritual era in his life occurred at least fourteen years before his circumcision, clearly showing that circumcision had nothing to do with it. It should be noted that Gen. 15 : 6 does not necessarily fix the time of his jus- tification. It was then that it became an assured and a revealed fact to him. About ten years before this, when he left his own country and came into the land of Canaan (Gen. 12 :4; U: I8-2O; 16: s), he believed God, and he should then be regarded as justified. But it was not till later that he came to know experi- mentally and as a revealed fact a right- eousness obtained through faith. 11. So far from this circumcision was given ia consequence of it, and as a seal in attestation of the righteousness of faith which he had while in uncir- cumcision. And, consequently^ he received the sign, or token, of cir- cumcision — a token of the covenant formed with him as " the father of a multitude of nations " ( Gen. 17 : 4-10) . A seal — a stamp by which anything is attested (icor. 9:2). Circumcision was a seal, an outward token, attesting the fact of the righteousness of faith (faith having been reckoned to him for righteousness) which he had heing uncircumcised. Circumcis- ion to him and to his descendants was a sign of God's covenant made with Abraham, but only to Abraham was it a seal of the righteousness of his faith exercised before his circumcision. It was therefore to him what it could not be to any of his descendants who were circumcised when eight days old. The argument is now complete in Abraham's ca.se that he was accounted righteous before he received circum- cision. Now comes the application of his case to this discussion. That he might be the father — spiritually, a conspicuous example to those exercis- ing faith and a leader of the faithful. The great doctrine of righteousness through faith was the more fully re- vealed to him, handed down from him, and traced back to him. As father and sons are animated by the same spirit to a common faith, so a like spirit and a righteousness apart from works char- acterized Abraham and the faithftil after him (Gai. 3 : 7 ; ps. 51 : 10, 16, 17), His faith was accounted for righteousness when he was uncircumcised, of which fact circumcision became to him an attesting seal in order that he might be the father of all them that be- lieve, though they be not cir- cumcised, that the righteousness might be im-puted,or reckoned, unto them also. 12. The construction in this verse is very difficult in the original. Its mean- ing is brought out in the following trans- lation : And father in relation to cir- cumcision, to those toho not only are of circumcision (having been circumcised), hxit who also walk in the steps (after the example) of the faith of our father, Abraham, which he had when yet in 66 ROMANS [Ch. IV. 13 For the promise that he should be the their of the world, was not to Abra- ham, or to his seed, "tlirough the law, »but through the righteousness of 14 faith. For Jif they which are of the law be heirs, " faith is made void, and 15 the promise made of none effect: be- cause a the law worketh wrath: for ^ where no law is, there is no transgres- 16 sion. Therefore it is of faith, that it might be "hy grace; ''to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed ; 13 For not through law was the promise to Abraham, or to his seed, that he should be heir of the world, but 14 through righteousness of faith. For if they tliat are of law are heirs, faith is made void, and the promise is made of 15 no effect. For the law works wrath ; but where there is no law, neither is 16 there transgression. For this cause it is of faith, that it may be according to grace ; in order that the promise may be sure to all the seed ; not to that only t Gen. 12 : 1-3 ; 17 : 4, etc. ; Gal. 3 : 29. u Gal. 3 : 16-18. x Ver. 11. « See 3 : 31. a 3 : 19, 20 ; 5 : 13, 20 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 56 ; 2 Cor. 3 : 7, 9. 6 5 d Gal. 3 : 22 ; Heb. 6 : 13-20. y Gal. 2 : 21 ; 5 : 4. 13. c 3 : 24-26 ; 5 uncircumcision. In the preceding verse Abraham is declared to be father of be- lie\ang Gentiles; in this verse, father of believing Jews ; and unbelieving Jews are excluded from this relation. So John the Baptist emphasized this spiritual relationship: "Begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abra- ham for our father," etc. (Luke 3:8). Our Saviour also: "If ye were Abraham's children, ye would do the works of Abraham" (John 8:39), The true chil- dren of Abraham are not his natural descendants, but those who have faith. 13. The great fact that Abraham was father of believing Jews and Gentiles is confirmed by another reason : The promise to Abraham and his seed w^as grounded on faith, not on works of law. For the promise to Abraham and his seed that he should be the heir of the Avorld was not through law, de- manding works and obedience, but throtigh righteousness of faith, that obtained by means of faith. The phrase " heir of the world " is not used in the promises to Abraham, but is a summary oftheirimpOrt(Gen.l2:2,3; 13:14-17; 15:18; 17 : 8 ; 22 : 18 ; compare Ps. 89). They Centered in the promise, " In thee shall all fami- lies of the earth be blessed." It was only in Christ, the seed of the promise (Gai. 3:16,17), that Abraham truly became "the heir of the world" (8:i7; i Cor. 15 : 24). Compare also : " For all things are yours . . . and ye are Christ's and Christ is God's " (i Cor. s : 21-23). 14. For if they that are of latv, especially those who depend on the w^orks of the Mosaic law, are heirs, faith is made void, rendered use- less, and the promise made of none effect (g.ii. 3 is). If the inher- itance comes through obedience to law then the faith ascribed to Abraham is useless and the promise too is inopera- tive and of no value, since the inherit- ance might be claimed as due for serv- ice, just as if no promise had been made. What God promised as a gra- tuity W'Ould be claimed as a reward. 15. Another reason given why the in- heritance does not come by works of law. Because the law worketh wrath, is the occasion of God's wrath, and ex- poses us to punishment as transgressors, inasmuch as no one fully meets its claims. If it therefore only aggravates man's case, how then could it secure to him the blessings of the inheritance? For, rather, £nt where there is no law neither is there transgression of any specific law, hence no wrath and no punishment. It is the law that gives the knowledge of sin (3 : 20) and to sin its condemning power. It must be outside and independent of law that the prom- ised inheritance can be secured. Paul here is careful and guarded in the use of the word transgression, which means a violation of a specific law. There is another word for sin in its broader and deeper meaning (5 : i3), which has refer- ence to wrong moral emotions and char- acter, and to the underlying corrupt moral nature. 16. Recurring to ver. 13, Paul applies what he had just said. Therefore — on account of this — such being the case that the law works wrath and cannot confer heirship, it, the inheritance, is of faith, that it may be according to grace — free, unmerited favor, not as a debt, but as a gift. To the end, or In order that the promise may be sure to all the seed. Only in this way could it be sure. Never could it" be if dependent on imperfect, chang- Ch. IV.] ROMANS 67 not to that ouly Avhich is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abraham ; e who is the father of us all, 17 (as it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations,) before him whom he belie veth, even God, ^who quickeueth the dead, and calleth those s things which be not as though they 18 were. Who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations, according to that which was spoken. So shall thy seed which is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abranam ; who 17 is the father of us all. (as it is written, A father of many nations have I made thee,) before God whom he believed, who makes alive the dead, and calls the things that are not as though they 18 were ; who against hope believed in hope, to the end that he might become father of many nations, according to that which was spoken, So shall thy e 9 : 8 ; Isa. 51 : 2. / 8 : 11 ; Eph. 2 : 1-5. ir 9 : 26 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 28 ; 1 Peter 2 : 10. ing, sinful man ; but ever would it be, if it rested on tlie faithful word of the eternal and unchanging God. The seed are the spiritual ones through faith (ver. 13). All is emphatic, and ex- panded in the next clause. The mean- ing is : That the promise may be sure to all the spiritual seed, not to that seed only Avhich is of the law, (that is, believing Jews), but to that seed also which is of the faith of Abraham (believing Gentiles (ver. i2)). "Both the grace and the certainty of the promise required that it should be connected with faith alone. But this implies that it is universal to all who believe." Who is the father of us all — who believe (Gai. 3 : 29). 17. As it is written — corroborating what he had just said. This and the quotation that follows are generally put in a parenthesis. I have made thee a father of many nations (Gen. 17 : 5 quoted from the Septuagint ver- sion). The primary reference of this promise appears to have been to his natural descendants ; but all the prom- ises to Abraham had also their spiritual significance. They had their letter and their spirit (2:28.29). Abraham w^as the natural ancestor of the Edomites, Ishmaelites, and many Arabian tribes, as well as of the Israelites (Gen. 25 : 1-4) ; l)ut spiritually of a numerous posterity of believers from all nations (ver. 11). The connection of thought makes the reference here to the latter. The word translated nations means also Gentiles, which makes the quotation the more striking. Before him Avhom he believed, even God. This is a very difficult phrase. The word trans- lated before means strictly over against, but according to a Hebrew idiom, he- fore, in the sight of, and so it is com- monly regarded. It can therefore be rendered, Before God in whom he be- lieved, meaning. He was father of many nations, before or in the sight of God in wiiom he believed. But another explanation is worthy of notice, though not without its difficulties. According to an Aramean idiom, an example oc- curring in Ezra 6 : 13, where tlie form corresponds exactly with this phrase in the Greek, it may be rendered, Because, or according as he believed God. With this translation there need be no paren- thesis. A colon may be placed at the end of ver. 16 and after " nations." Who quickeneth the dead — with reference to Abraham and Sarah (ver. 19 ; Heb. 11 : 11. u. 19). God's almighty power and his omniscience were the ground of Abraham's faith. And calleth the things that are not as though they were — referring to unborn generations, the descendants of Abraham and Sarah. To God the future is as present; the unborn as if existing. ]\Iany render. And calleth into being the things that are not, with reference to his omnipo- tent, creative power. But the former is the simpler and more natural expla- nation (Acts 7:5). "The nations which should spring, physically or spiritu- ally, from him God spoke of as having an existence, which word Abraham be- lieved" (Alfoed). 18. Abraham is exhibited as a re- markable example of faith. Who against hope, and contra)^ to hope, believed in hope, resting npon hope. Contrary to all human grounds of rea- soning he notwithstanding believed, resting his hope on the ground of the Divine promise. A good illustration of what faith is. (Compare Heb. 11:1, 8-10.) That he might, etc. His faith ex- tending thus far, that he might or should become father of many nations (see on ver. 17), according to that which ^vas 68 ROMANS [Ch. IV. 19 be. And being not weak in faith, •> he considered not liis own body now dead, wlien lie was about an hundred years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah's 20 womb : he staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but was strong in faith, giving glory to God ; 21 and being fully persuaded that, what he had promised, Uie was able also to 22 perform. And therefore •'it was im- puted to him for righteousness. 23 Now 'it was not written for his sake 24 alone, that it was imputed to him ; but for us also, to whom it shall be im- puted, if we believe on him that raised 19 seed be. And being not weakened in faith, he considered his own body al- ready dead, being about a hundred years old, and the deadness of Sarah's 20 womb ; but in view of the promise of God he wavered not through unbelief, but was made strong in faith, giving 21 glory to God, and being fully assured, that what he had promised he was able 22 also to perform, \\herefore also it was reckoned to him for righteousness. 2o And it was not written for his sake alone, that it was reckoned to him ; 24 but for ours also, to whom it will be reckoned, if we believe on him who raised Jesus our Lord from the dead : A Gen. 17 : 17 ; 18 : 11-U ; Heb. 11 : 11, 12. i Luke 1 : 37, 45. J 15 : 4 ; 1 Cor. 10 : 6, 11 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 16, 17. k Vcr. 3, 6. spoken, So, as the stars for multi- tude, shall thy seed be (oeu. 15:5, quoted from the Septuagiut ; Heb. 11 : 12 \ 19. And being not weak, but on the contrary strong, in faith, he considered not, he did not regard — he made no account of his own body now dead (figuratively), etc., but against all human probabilities and all human analogies, rested on God's prom- ise. But the highest critical authori- ties omit not after co7isidered , and trans- late, he considered his oivn body now as good as dead . . . but staggered not, etc. Not being weak in faith he was well aware of and considered well the impos- sibilities as to nature, but as to the prom- ise of God he wavered not through un- belief. His foith was not shaken. This reading and the interpretation growing out of it accords well with ver. 18, where Abraham is said to rest upon hope in God, when no hope appeared on the human side, and also with Gen. 17 : 17, one of the surprises in Abra- ham's faith, but only a surprise, for he showed his steadfast faith in his imme- diate obedience in being circumcised himself, and circumcising Ishmael and all the males in his house. 20. He staggered not, etc. If not is omitted after considered, in the preceding verse, then translate, but as to the promise of God, he wavered not through nn belief, he did not look upon it distrustfully, neither did he doubt through lackof foith, butwaxed strong in faith. So far from wavering he increased in faith, giving glory to God, doubtless in oral praise and ado- ration, and in honoring his faithful- ness and power by his conduct and life. 21. And being fully persuaded, or assured, that what he had prom- ised, he was able also to perform — a general truth, applicable in our day as well as in Abraham's or Paul's. 32. And therefore, etc., where- fore also, on account of this faith, this simple, unconditional confidence in God and his promise, it was im- puted, reckoned, to him for right- eousness. Notice how emphasis is put upon Abraham's strong fiiith, as il- lustrated in ver. 13-21 ; and that an important element in his faith was " giving glory to God" (ver. 20). What- ever merit there might be in it was not on his part but belonged Avholly to God, to whom he gave glory, since it was his work in him ( Eph. 2:8; see further on ver. 3). 23. Application of what has been said regarding Abraham to Christians — Now it Avas not Avritten, when it was first recorded, for his sake alone — its design was not merely to record a historical fact and do honor to that il- lustrious patriarch, that it "was im- puted, accounted, to him, but rather that he should be a type and pattern to believers in every age. ( Comp. i Cor. 9 : lo ; 10 : 6, 11: Gal. 3: 8.) 24. But for us also — for our ben- efit and profit, to whom it will be reck- oned, if we believe on him Avho raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead. Faith in God is required in us as well as in Abraham. This is the parallel whicli Paul wislied here to draw, lender tlie gospel to believe in God is to believe in Christ, for Christ is the way to God ; and to believe in Christ is to believe in God, for Christ is Ch. IV.] ROMANS 69 25 up Jesus our Lord from the dead; °> who I 25 who was delivered up for our tres- was delivered for our offences, and I passes, and was raised for our justifica- "was raised again for our justification. | tiou. OT 5 : 6-8 ; 8 : 32 ; Isa. 53 : 5, 6, 10-12 ; 2 Cor. 5 : 21. n 8 : 33, 34 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 17. God manifested in the flesh (John i : i, ii ; 12 ; u, 45 ; 14 : 1, 6, 9) . Abraham too looked forward to Christ (John s: 56). Notice also the emphasis put upon Christ's resurrection. It was the great de- cisive evidence of his divine mission as the Christ, the Saviour of the world (10; 9; Acts 1 : 22 ; 4:33, etc-). It WaS the greatest of miracles, and an exhibition of Divine power here paralleled with that inferior one in the birth of Isaac, And the birth of Isaac was not stranger to the Jew than the spiritual birth of Gen- tiles through faith alone. 25. This verse contains the very heart of the gospel. Who was de- livered up unto death. Delivered up by Judas (Matt. 26 : 48-5o) and by the Jew- ish authorities (Matt. 27:2), by God's fixed purpose and foreknowledge (Acts 2 : 23) and voluntarily by himself, acting in accordance with the will of the Father (John 10 : 17, is ; is : 11). FOF, 071 account of , our offenses, because we had sinned and to make expiation for sin ( Isa. 53 :5, 6; Heb. 9 : 28; 1 Peter 2 :24). The word offenses, translated^ trespasses in the Revised version, includes any deviation from truth and upright- ness. And was raised for our justification, /or the sake of — to se- cure our justification — the forgiveness of sins and restoration to the Divine favor, our being accounted as right- eous and our acceptance with God. The word here translated justifica- tion occurs only here and in 5 : 18. (See on 1 : 17 (4) ; also on 3 : 26.) But hoW was Christ's resurrection necessary to our justification? (1) A dead Christ would have shown that sin and death had been triumphant ; the living Christ implies a victor who is able to save to the uttermost ( l : ^ ; 7 : 24, 25 ; 8 : 34 ; 1 Cor. 15:55-57). (2) Christ' s atoning death would have been in vain if he had not risen to be a human and divine medi- ator and intercessor ; to be also exalted as a Prince and a Saviour to give repent- ance and the remission of sins, and to bestow the promised Holy Spirit ( i Cor. 15 : 17 ; Acts 2 : 33 ; 5 : 31 ; Heb. 7 : 25) . (3 ) Wc need Christ as our life as well as our death. We die to sin and self in him, and we rise with him to newness of life (6:3,4,7-11). (4) His great work as a Redeemer was not complete without his resurrection. He must rise to continue his work personally before God in heaven, and through the Holy Spirit among men on earth (Heb. 9: 9-15, 23-26; 10 : 12-18). Practical Remarks. 1. The righteousness by faith was ex- emplified in Abraham and David (ver. 1-8; Heb. 11 : 17, 32, 33). 2. God's method of saving sinners takes away all boasting, even from the best of men (ver. 2, 3 ; Eph. 2 : 8-10). 3. Justification by works and justifica- tion by faith are diametrically opposed to each other, and cannot be even partially united (ver. 5, 6 ; 11 : 6). 4. Persons are justified as undeserving and ungodly without any merit of their own, but for what Christ has done for them and is to them (ver. 5; 5:6; Phil. 3:9). 5. Saving faith is the same in all ages and dispensations (ver. 5-8 ; Heb. 11 : 1, 5, 6, etc.). 6. True happine.ss comes only to those to whom God reckons not sin but right- eousness (ver. 6-8 ; 5 : 1, 2 ; 8 : 1, 5). 7. True happiness does not depend on outward conditions or mere externals (ver. 9-11; Matt. 5 : 3-11). 8. Justification, by which a righteous- ness is accounted to us by faith, is a doc- trine both of the Old and New Testament, and is suited to all men (ver. 8, 9 ; Hab. 2:4; Isa. 53 :11). 9. The perversion of rites, ceremonies, and means of grace, by regarding them as meritorious, has been common under the gospel as Avell as under the law (ver. 9-12 ; Gal. 1:6: 3 : 2-4). 10. In God's covenants with his ancient people, we should distinguish the letter from the Spirit, the shadow from the sub- stance (ver. 11, 12 ; Heb. 10 : 16; Gal. 4 : 21-27). 11. There appears to have been two covenants made with Abraham, the one 70 ROMANS [Ch. V. by which, as progenitor of the Messiah and father of the faithful, he was con- stituted heir of the world (ver. 13), the other "the covenant of circumcision" (Acts 7:8), which was to mark his natural descendants and be a bond of a national organization (ver. 11-13 ; Gen. 12 : 3 ; 15 : 5,6; 17 : 10-14; 22: 18). 12. Circumcision of the descendants of Abraham in all ages attests his faith which he exercised before he was circum- cised (ver. 11 ; Gen. 15 : 5-18 ; ver. 17 ; 17 : 2-11). 13. Baptism did not take the place of cir- cumcision. The latter was a national rite for all the male descendants of Abraham ; the former is a gospel rite for believers, both male and female. Circumcision was a seal of Abraham's faith alone (ver. 11) ; baptism is not a seal but a symbol of the inward change of those who are to receive it (6 : 3, 4). If Paul and the other New Testament writers had known of this re- lation existing between circumcision and baptism, how strange it is that they never refer to it. It would have been most natural at the apostolic conference (Acts 15), and at other times, for them to say: Baptism takes the place of circumcision. But they neither said nor hinted anything of the kind, showing that the thought never occurred to them (ver. 11, 12). 14. Spiritual service of the heart has been required in all dispensations, and has ever been essential to godliness (ver. 11-13 ; 1 Sam. 15 : 22 ; Micah 6:8; Heb. 11 :5). 15. AH true believers are of the seed of Abraham, and are brethren, and with Christ their Head are heirs of the wolrd (ver. 11-13; Gal. 3 : 29). 16. God's people are not restricted by national limits. The spiritual nature of Christ's kingdom and of church-member- ship are against all national, sacramental, and hereditary theories of the church (ver. 11-13 ; John 4 : 24 ; 18 : 36). 17. God has made no promises of salva- tion on account of morality or mere forms of religion. They afford no ground of faith or of justification (ver. 14 ; 10 : 2-4 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 5). 18. There can be no ju-^^tification by the law which works wrath. That which con- demns cannot justify (ver. 15 ; 7 : 7-11). 19. It is the gratuitousness of salvation ihxough. faith that renders it suited to all men in all ages (ver. 16 ; 10 : 11-13). 20. Our faith should be strong, since we have the promises of God backed by his omnipotence, omnipresence, and all the infinite resources of his being (ver. 17-21 ; 1: 16; Eph. 3 : 20). 21. Giving glory to God is an important element in all true worship. Distrust of God's power, wisdom, and goodness is the highest dishonor we can cast on his name (ver. 20 ; John 16 : 9 ; 1 John 5 : 10). 22. We should rest implicitly on the promises of God. No obstacle in their way should cause us to doubt their fulfill- ment (ver. 21, 22 ; Isa. 40 : 8 ; 46 : 9, 10 ; 2 Cor. 1 : 20). 23. The Scriptures are for our instruc- tion, that we might know the way to God through Jesus Christ (ver. 23, 24 ; 2 Cor. 5 :19; Isa. 61: 10). 24. The resurrection of Christ was the crowning miracle of the gospel, and the mainspring of our hopes of salvation (ver. 24 ; 2 Tim. 1 : 10 ; 1 Peter 1 : 3, 21 ; 1 Thess. 4 : 14; John 14 : 19). 25. The death and resurrection of Christ are inseparably connected with man's salvation. Without his death there could have been no expiation of sin, and with- out his resurrection no object of faith and no justification (ver. 25; Acts 17:3; 20:21). CHAPTER V. Thus far the argument is complete. The gospel is the power of God unto salvation, for in it is revealed a right- eousness of God which can be ob- tained through faith. All men are sin- ners and under condemnation, and need this righteousness (i:i8-3:2o). It can be obtained through grace, entirely in- dependent of works of law, by faith in Christ Jesus, avIio has redeemed us and offered up himself as a propitiatory sacrifice. Thus all the demands on the part of God are satisfied, anhamed ; because the love of God has been poured forth in our hearts, through the Holy Spirit which Avas given to us. 6 For when we were yet weak, in due season Christ died for the ungodly. t 1 Peter 1 : 6, 7. u Lam. 3 ; 22-25. X 8 : 14-17 : 2 Cor. 1 : 22 ; Gal. 4:6. y Isa. 1 f Isa. 49 : 23 ; Phil. 1 : 20 : 2 Tim. 1 : 12. 4, 5 ; Hosea 13 : 9 ; Eph. 2:1-5. z Gal. 4 : 4. afflictions, also. If we adopt iu ver. 1 the reading, " Let us have peace," then we must translate here, Let u.s glory, or rejoice, lu our justitied state our rela- tions are so changed to God that our afflictions become proofs of his love and matters of joy and thankfulness (8:i8; Heb. 12 : 6). They develop Christian graces, as the apostle goes on to show. Knowing — because we know — that tribulation, or affliction, Avorketh patience — endurance, as a trait of character and habit of mind. This is exhibited in the Christian, developed even in the greatest trials and sutfer- ings (2 Cor. 8:2). Compare the words of our Lord (Matt. 5 : 4, 10-12)^ and the ex- perience of the ajWStleS (Acts 5 : 41; 2 Cor. 12 : 10, 11: 1 Peter 4 : 13. 14), 4. And patience, experience; a7i approved or tried character (2 Cor. 2:9; Phil. 2:22). The Bible Union ver- sion translates approval, a condition of approval, with a consciousness of it (Eph. 1 : 13). Patience works what? That wliich is felted, tried, approved, in the mind and character of the indi- vidual ; hence a tried character, one which has stood the test, and through endurance has become hardened to trials, and strong to meet and overcome them. And experience, tried char- acter, hope. To the Christian him- self his own state of mind and character produces fresh hope, and sustains and develops hope, by the proof he has of the truth and value of religion and of God's approbation (James 1:3, 4. See on hope in ver. 2). 5. And hope maketh not ashamed — it does not put us to sliame by ending in disjippointment (Ps. 22:5). Because, intrmlucinga rea.son for the foregoing statement. The ground of this assurance of these developed })ene- fits of afflictions, and especially of our hope, is found not in our strengtli of purpose or of character, but in God's love to us ; and this is brought out in what follows as far as ver. 11. Be- cause the love of God — not our love to God, but God's love to us, which is shed abroad, rather, which has been poured forth, as it were, in our hearts by means of the Holy Spirit ( John 16 ; 14 ; 1 Cor. 2 : 9, 10) , filling OUr hearts with the blissful consciousness of his favor and the enjoyment of his unpar- alleled love. Which is given unto us — rather, tchich tras giirn to ?<.«, re- ferring to the Pentecostal outpouring of the Spirit. The Christian has in him- self the pledge that his hope shall be realized in the manifestation of God's love in his own heart, through the Holy Spirit the Comforter given him as promised in John 15:26. (Comp. Eph. 1 : 14. ) It should be noted, however, that God's love does not exclude, but rather produces, our love to him. The two must exist together in the heart (John 4 : 10, 19). 6. In this and the two following verses, Paul shows the greatness and the disinterestedness of God's love to us from the circumstances under which it was exercised. For, introduces the proof of God's love to us in Christ. For while tee icere still without strength, .<;piritually helpless, entirely unaV)le to free ourselves from sin and its consequences, in due time, in the proper and right season of tlie world's history (Gai. 4:2, 4), Christ died for the ungodly, in behalf of the impious, those without reverence toward God. IIow strikingly Paul presents the Di- vine love toward us. God g-ave his Son to die for us, when we were without help in ourselves, and without any claim on either his justice or goodness. It was at tlie time appointed by Go by one man sin en- tered into the world, and i death by- sin ; and so death passed upon all men, 13 for that ^all have sinned. For until 12 Therefore, as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin ; and so death passed imto 13 all men, for that all sinned ; for until h Gen. 3 : 6. i Gren. 2 : 17 ; James 1 : 15. k See refs. 3 : 23. 12. Wherefore — on account of this reconciliation (ver. n) ensuring triumph- ant joy in the trials of life and tinal sal- vation to the justified (ver. i-ii). As if Paul had said, accordingly, then there is an analogy between the loss of God's favor through the sin of one and its re- covery through the obedience of one. As — naturally introduces a compari- son ; but where do we find a so intro- ducing the second member of the com- parison? Some would find it virtually in ver. 14, which speaks of Christ as the antitype of Adam. But this con- struction seems harsh and unnatural. The corresponsive so does not seem to appear till ver. 18, where Paul re- sumes the main subject of his discourse. As by, or through, one man sin entered into the Avorld. Paul does not mean to exclude Eve as a partaker in the transgression, for Adam was the head and representative of his family ( 1 Cor. 11 : 8; Eph. 5 : 23). BcsidcS the WOrd Adam, or man (Gen. 5:2), is applied to both Adam and Eve, including the two sexes, "And called their name Adam," or man, "in the day when they were created." The word sin is personified, and action is attri1)uted to it. It en- tered into the ivorld, implying a perma- nent change and a new element intro- duced into the world. This is confirmed in the next verse by the expression, "sin Avas in the world," which implies a permanent state. It cannot therefore mean a single act of transgression, that one man committed a single act of sin ; but rpther that sin entered into our world as a ruling power or principle. It is distinguished from "transgres- sion" (ver. u) and "offense" or tres- pass (ver. 15, 16, 17, 18, 20). And death entered into the world, a ruling power by, or through, sin. Comp. ver. 14, " Death reigned from Adam to Moses." The selection of this term was occa- sioned by Gen. 2 : 17, " In the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die." In this passage and throughout the Scriptures sin and death are re- g;i rded as cause and effect ( Jer. 31 : 30 ; Rom. 6:16, 21, 24; 8:13; James 1:15; Rev. 2:11). Thus death includes all the penal con- sequences of sin, physical and spiritual death ( i cor. is : 21, 56)." As the one is the separation of soul and body, so the other is separation of the soul from God, and this continued and fixed for- ever is eternal death, which is also called the second death. The loss of God's favor was the greatest and the immediate result of sin (Gen. 3 : 7-13), al- though the decree of physical death was at once passed (Gen. 3: 19). Paul evidently takes the temporal penalty of physical death as the representative of all and the ground of his reasoning (ver. u). " Adam, if he had not sinned, might have passed to higher forms of life, but without a violent separation of soul and body, without being 'un- clothed,' but by being ' clothed upon ' (2 Cor. 5:2-4), or ill the beautiful figure of the rabbins, ' by a kiss of the Al- mighty ' " (SCHAFF in Lange). And so — And thus, in the way as stated, death passed through unto all men, none escaping his power. This accords with what he had just stated, "sin entered the world" and "death entered by sin." The universality of sin and death is here described. For that — an old rendering, in whom, that is, in Adam, is now generally given up. It is now almost unanimously agreed that it means, On the ground that, because that. The rendering in the Common version, For that, ex- presses the true idea. Death extended unto all men, on the ground that, or for that all have sinned, rather, o/Z sinned — a statement of a historical fact, naturally referring to the one act by which sin entered into the world. Paul states a fact but does not stop to explain it. "The question how the en- tire race became involved in the conse- quences of the one act of the one man, is not discussed by the apostle. The fact alone is affirmed. Godet well re- marks : ' In the revelation given to the apostle of the system of salvation, this mysterious connection was supposed biit not explained'" (J. R. Boise). Almost numberless volumes have been 76 ROMANS [Ch. V. the law sin was in the world : but ' sin is not imputed when there is no law. the law sin was in the world ; but sin is not reckoned when there is no law. 2 4 : 15. written in defense of various theories explaining this question ; but whatever defects there may be in theories, the fact remains. Dr. A. H. Strong in his " Theology " (P- 331 ) thus puts it : " In connection with this problem a central fact is announced in Scripture, which we feel compelled to believe upon di- vine testimony, even though every at- tempted explanation should prove un- satisfactory. That central fact, Avhich constitutes the substance of the Scrip- ture doctrine of original sin is simply this : That the sin of Adam is the im- mediate cause and ground of inborn de- pra^aty, guilt, and condemnation to the whole human race." In this passage Paul presents Adam as the head of the race, and appears plainly to teach that the race sinned in him, and that he acted for the race. The most natural explanation seems to me to be, that the race was germinallj^ included in Adam as its natural head. ( See aUo ver. is ; l Cor. 15 : 22 ; Heb. 7 : 5, 10 ; Ps. 51 : 5.) Paul Certainly does not teach that all have consciously and personally sinned in Adam ; for this is opposed to the Avhole passage, which repeatedly says that oiie sin, not numberless sins, is the cause of death passing upon all men ; and also to ver. 13, 14 which treat of certain persons sulfcring death, who did not commit sin after the likeness of Adam's trans- gression. Paul teaches tlie great fact that through Adam both sin and death became universal, the lot of all, adding the last clause. For that all sinned, im- plying a certain union of the race in him, and showing that sin as well as death is universal ; for the penalty wliich is the effect could not extend farther than the cause extended. With this statement that the universal de- pravity of the race is the consequence of the sinful act of one, the way is pre- pared for the parallel in ver. 18 and throughout tlie passage. 13. The phrase "For that all sinned," might suggest, as in 2 : 14, a seeming paradox of sin in absence of law. The apostle therefore breaks off the regular course of thought to illus- trate and confirm what he liad just said. For until the law — the Mo- saic law would be naturally understood, and this agrees well with the period mentioned in the next verse, from Adam to Moses." Sin was in the world — that introduced by Adam con- tinued as a resident of the world (ver. 12). But sin is not imputed. The verb in Greek occurs nowhere else except in an inscription. A verb almost identi- cal, with the same derivation, is found in Philem. 18, " put that to my account." It means to reckon or set to one's ac- count. But by whom is sin taken into account? Augustine, Luther, Calvin, and others, answer, by the sinner him- self. Men did not reckon it against themselves, they did not come to the consciousness of it, for through the law is the knowledge of sin (3 : 20 ; 7 : 9). But this is foreign to the context and to the argument of the whole section. Paul is not treating of the inward sense of sin, but rather of sin and its penalty. In- consistent also with 2 : 15. Hence Meyer, Alford, Hodge, Olshausen, and others regard God as the one who here does not take sin into account, with reference to its punishment, when there is no Jaw. This seems to be the mean- ing required by the passage. But Al- ford and a few others think they see a modified sense of the verb, is not foi'vi- ally, fully, or strictly reckoned by God, that is, in the relative absence of law sin is not held to its full accountabilitv. In support of this Acts 17 : 30, " God's overlooking the time of ignorance," and Rom. 2 : 12 ; 3 : 25, are appealed to. This meaning of the verb is possible, but it is not best to found an interpreta- tion of so important a passage on the somewhat doubtful meaning of a word. To return then to the beginning of the verse Paul explains and confirms Avhat he had just said by a fact. For until the law sin teas in the irorld. This every believer in the Old Testament would acknowledge. The wickedness of men before the flood (Gen. 6:5)^ of Sodom (Gen. 18:20), and of the Canaan- ites (Lev. 18:25), was a proof of this. The apostle then states a common prin- ciple of justice : Sin cannot be imputed or reckoned against one and its penalty inflicted, when there is no lau\ But it Ch. v.] ROMANS 77 14 Nevertheless "death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression ; °who is the 15 figure of him that was to come. But 14 But yet death reigned from Adam un- til Moses, even over those who sinned not after the likeness of Adam's trans- gression, who is a type of the Coming TO Ver. 17, 21. n 1 Cor. 15 : 21, 22, 45. would easily occur to every one familiar with the period between Adam and Moses, that sin was during that time reckoned or imiKited. Such examples as the deluge, Sodom and Gomorrah, Pharaoh, and the Canaanites,, prove that God did bring the sins of men to a terrible reckoning. But then against what law ? Was it the law written in men's hearts and consciences, referred to in 2 : 14, 15 ? But the line of Paul's parallelism and argument did not re- quire him to notice this. (see next ver.) 14. Having stated a principle, with- out applying it, Paul asserts another fact. Nevertheless — But though this principle is true and the Mosaic law had not been given, yet death, the very penalty inflicted on Adam, reigned, held sway like a monarch, from Adam to Moses, showing that sin was reckoned and some law was transgressed. Was it not the law Adam transgressed ? We must restrict the thought just as Paul restricts it and not broaden its application. For while it is evident that men between Adam and Moses transgressed the law written in their hearts and consciences (see last ver.), yet it does not appear that Paul is speaking of the penalty of that law here. Death, the penalty of Adam's 8171, had come upon his descendants, showing that in some way they had broken that law, and the sin had been reckoned against them. This appears still more clearly in the next clause. Even over them that had not sinned, or, sinned not, after the similitude, or, likeness of Adam's transgression, that is, who sinned not personally and consciously as Adam did. The reference to the unwritten law in the heart and conscience seems to be entirely excluded here, not only by Paul's logical reasoning, but also from his assertion that All sinned (ver. 12), which must include multitudes of infants and idiots who did not sin in their own persons, consciously breaking some known law. The language used, who sinned not after the likeness of Adamrs transgression, describes exactly such persons who were not in a state of moral consciousness or who had not ar- rived at that state. Paul does not specify infants, because he wished to in- clude others in much the same moral condition ; and therefore he uses gen- eral language. But if their sin was not against the unwritten law, it must have been against the P^den command ; if it was not after the likeness of Adam's transgression, then it was the same as his. What other law or statute was there besides these for which sin could be reckoned? The conclusion seems irresistible. All sinned in Adam. And if true of the race till Moses, it would be true for all time. Paul however states facts, and in his brief arguments leaves conclusions to be drawn by his readers. He propounds no philosophi- cal explanations. We may well be- lieve that the race lay in the loins of their great progenitor and shared in his transgression (seeon ver. 12, end) ; that his trespass when he fell was the trespass of the race. There was a personal union in him, just as we may believe there is a vital connection with him, by which the characteristics of Adam, physically, mentally, and morally, have descended to his posterity. Adam being himself sinful and mortal could beget only those who were such. Who is the figure — rather, a type, of him who was to come ; that is, of Christ (Matt. 11:3). Adam was the type or likeness of Christ by contrast. (Seel Cor. 15:21,22.) But Abbott takcS the phrase to mean tvho icas the type of the future, that is, of the oncoming race of man, in his fall, sin, and pun- ishment. But the context and the thought of the whole section rather re- quire a reference to the Coining One, the Christ. The comparison which be- gan with ver. 12 is broken off abruptly at the end of the verse. In ver. 15 it is referred to as if well understood. It Avas prominent in the apostle's mind, and most naturally he indicates it here in saying that Adam was the type of 78 ROMANS [Ch. V. not as the olTeuce. so also is the free gift. For if tlirough the offence of one "many be dead, much more the grace of God, and Pthe gift by grace, Schick ii< by one man, Jesus Christ, hatli 16 abounded i unto many. And not as it was by one that sinned, so is tlie gift : for 'the judgment was by one to con- demnation, but the free gift is ^oi 17 many offences unto justification. For 15 On . But not as tlie trespass, so also is the gift ; for if by the trespass of the one the many died,'much more did the grace of God, and tlie gift by the grace of the one man, Jesus Christ, abound 16 to the many. And not as through one that sinned, is the gift ; for the judg- ment came of one unto condemnation, but the gift came of many trespasses 17 unto justification. For if by the tres- o Ver. 12, 18. p 6 : 23 ; 2 Cor. 9 : 15. q Matt. 20 : 28 ; 26 : 28.. s Luke 7 : 47 ; 1 Cor. 6 : 10, 11. r Gen. 3 : 6-19. the coming One. The same thought is brought out in 1 Cor. 15 : 45-47, where the apostle contrasts the first and the sec- ond Adam. As Adam was the head of the human race, so Christ is the head especially of his redeemed people. The next verse seems to imply and demand such a reference here. See Practical Remark 15, at the end of the chapter. 15. Having referred to Adam and Christ, each standing at the head of a long line, as type and antitype, Paul stops to state in this and the two follow- ing verses some contrasts in these two relations, in which that of the believer to Christ is the more fully unfolded. The language is remarkably concise, its structure peculiar, and its meaning somewhat obscure. But not as the offence, or the trespass of Adam, in- cluding also the idea of the conse- quences of his sin. So also the free gift of eternal life (John lo : 28), includ- ing the idea of its consequences like- wise. The meaning seems to be this : There is a difference, however, between the case of Adam, through whose tres- pass all fell, and that]of Christ, through whom the gift of eternal life is offered to all. On offense see on 4 : 25. For if through, rather, by, the oflence of one many be dead, rather, the many died. The conclusion is from the less to the greater. Much more. This may be, much more in degree did grace abound, or much more logically, that is, with stronger reason or probal)il- ity. Either is appropriate, and each is defended by eminent expositors. The latter, however, accords with similar language in ver. 9, 10, and 17, and also commends it.self by its fitness and propriety of thought : If the many suf- fer from the fall of one, much more rea.sonal)le and probable is it that the many should be benefited by the grace of God and the gift of one. " For God far rather allows his goodness to pre- vail than his severity. On this presup- position the conclusion rests" (Meyer). The grace of God, the source of the gift, and the gift hy the grace of the one man Jesus Christ. (See 2 Cor. 8 :9.) " Grace is opposed to the offence; the gift to they that are dead, and it is the gift of life " ( Bengel). Abounded, or did abound — richlj' extending unto the many. This too was the echo of his own experience (1 Tim. 1 : 13, 14). The many regain more in Christ than the many lost in Adam. The believer is more than restored to the state in which Adam originally was. How gloriously does the grace and the gift by grace con- trast in richness and greatness with the offense. 16. Paul presents another contrast. And not as through one that sinned is the gift. The consequences in Adam's case were occasioned by one sin ; that in Clirist's case by many offenses of individuals and the race. Only a hint of the meaning is given in this first clause, to be supplied from what fol- lows. For the judgment, the judi- cial sentence, came from one offense unto condemnation. The one tres- pass came to be the occasion of a sen- tence of condemnation. But, on the contrary, the free, or gracious, gift came of many offences unto justi- fication. In a certain sense it may be said that the many trespasses were the occasion of the justification — a gra- cious sentence of acquittal. "Witliout them there Mould have been no need of it. They made it necessary. Thus the contrast is briefly brought to view. On the one hand one transgres.sion occa- sions the condemnation, on the otiier hand numerous transgressions occasion and give the opportunity of their gra- cious forgiveness. ( Comp. ver. 20. ) On justification, see 1 : 17 (5). Ch. v.] ROMANS 79 if by one man's offence death reigned by one ; much more they which re- ceive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness * shall reign in 18 life by one, Jesus Christ. Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation ; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came "ui)on all men unto.justifica- 19 tion of life. For as by one man's dis- obedience many were made sinners, pass of the one, death reigned through the one ; much more they who receive the abundance of the grace, and of the gift of righteousness, will reign in life through the one, Jesus Christ. 18 So then, as through one trespass it came to all men unto condemnation ; so also through one righteous act it came to all men unto justification of 19 life. For as through the disobedience of the one man the many were constituted t Matt. 25 : 31 ; Rev. 5 : 9, 10. M John 12 : 32 ; 1 Tim. 2:4-6; Heb. 2 : 9. 17. For, to enlarge upon and con- firm the contrasts just made in the two preceding verses. For if by one man's offence, rather, For if by the trespass of the one death reigned through the one. (Seever. 15.) Reigned — held sway as a monarch (ver. 14). Much more reasonable and probable is it, that they who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness, etc. The righteousness is that wrought out through the obedience of Jesus Christ in his life and death, (seei : n (2).) Both the grace of God and the right- eousness of Christ are a free gift, and both bestowed abundantly, resulting in eternal life. Shall reign — will reign in life through the one, Je^as Christ. Notice how the apostle brings out the full name of Jesus Christ as in holy ex- ultation. "An air of rapturous tri- umph pervades the closing part of this verse" (Boise). The degradation of sin and death is surpassed by the super- abundance of righteousness and life. 18. The parallelism commenced in ver. 12 is here resumed under a form suggested by the preceding context. Compare Gal. 2 : 6 for a similar style. This verse and the next contain a con- cise comparison of the results between Adam and Christ. Therefore — Ac- cordingly then, in view of what just precedes and resuming the sentence begun in ver. 12. As by the offence, etc. A mere summary is given ; the verbs are omitted ; the construction is the most concise possible. Only the words which are pointers and to be kept in mind are given. To complete the sense some words must be supplied. The Revised version, like our Common version, supplies judgment came, and the free gift came. The Improved Bible Union simply sup- plies it came in each case. It was may be supplied, as perhaps nearest the apos- tle's thought. The verse may be ren- dered : Accordingly then a^ through one trespass it was unto all men unto con- demnation, so also through one right- eous act it was unto all men unto justifi- cation of life. Notice that in the first half of this verse the sin of all in ver, 12 is carried over into the con- demnation of all, as in ver. 16. The one righteous act is a better rendering than the righteousness of one. (See on 1 : 17 (5).) Christ's meritorious obedience, culminating in giving him- self up to death, is presented as a whole (Gal. 1:4; Phil. 2:8), and sct over against Adam's disobedience. Justi- fication. (See on 1 : 17 (4); also 4 : 25.) Justification of life is that acquittal and restoration to the Divine favor which is connected with eternal life in its present beginning and future results, just as eternal death begins with and results from condemnation. Unto all men. The apostle gives universality to both cases in order to make the analogy perfect. It is also true that the death of Christ had reference to all men. It atoned for the sins of all men so far as they sinned in Adam, and hence a full satisfaction is made for all who die in infancy ; and the atonement in refer- ence to all mankind is such that the provisions and offers of justification are for all. In the next verse the actual results of Christ's work is stated and there Paul makes the necessary limitation to many instead of all. This change itself stands opposed to the doctrine of universal salvation. The change in form appears intentional, and the limitation accords with Paul's doctrine elsewhere. 19. For introduces the ground and proof of the statement of the preceding verse. This verse contains also the summary of ver. 12-18. It includes 80 ROMANS [Ch. V. * so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous. 20 Moreover j the law entered, that the oflfeuce might abound. But Mvhere sin abounded, grace did much more 21 abound : that as sin hath reigned unto sinners, so also through the obedience of the one will the many be consti- 20 tuted righteous. But the law came in beside, that the trespass might abound. But where sin abounded, grace super- 21 abounded; that as sin reigned in z Isa. 53 : 10-12 ; Dan. 9 : 24 ; 2 Cor. 5 : 21. z Sec 2 Chron. 33 : 9-13 ; 3/ 3 : 19, 20 ; John 15 : 22 ; Gal. 3 : 19-25. Luk<.' 7 : 47 ; 28 : 39-43. in the parallelism the real facts in their exactness, the many, the natural de- scendants of Adam, the many, the spiritual descendants of Christ. I'he many may mean the whole, the greater part, or a large number, and which of these it means in any given case must be learned from the evident intention of the writer and from the known facts in the case. When we take into account the half of the race that die before the age of spiritual accountabil- ity, and the vast multitude that will be saved in the days of the millennial glory, the many of the redeemed will doubtless include the larger part of the human race. J'he disobedience of the one man, as in ver. 12, points to Adam's sin. The obedience of the one, like "the one righteous act" of ver. 18, points to Christ's meritorious obedience. Were made ^ or constitu- ted, sinners . . . shall be made, or constituted, righteous. By virtue of their union with Adam the race be- came sinners actually and personally through his disobedience. So also by virtue of a spiritual union with Christ ihe redeemed will become virtually such in their justification and actually and personally such in their sanctification. It is common for expositors to limit the meaning of viU be constituted to being accounted righteous and dealt with as such. But Paul is speaking, in this chapter, of the happy results of justifi- cation, and it was perfectly natural that he sliould go beyond the mere act of justification itself. And as he is about to treat of things pertaining to sancti- fication in tlie next chapter, it was natural that he should anticipate in thought what was already filling his mind. See also how his mind passes on to the supera bounding grace of eter- nal life in ver. 21. BoiSE, who prefers to translate established instead of con- stitute, says: "In the one case, the certainty became determined in the very beginning of the race ; in the other, it will be determined at the very end, when all the redeemed shall be gathered in." 20, It was necessary to a full view of the results of justification, in this comparison of Adam and Christ, to no- tice the design and eftect of the Mosaic law and the position it held in the re- ligious history of the race. This is the point unfolded in this and the next verse. Moreover, or rather. But laio came in alongside of sin which was al- ready in the world ("r. is). Law in the original is emphatic but without the article. It is evident from ver. 13, 14, that the Mosaic law is meant, in which law was revealed and enforced anew. It corresponds also with Gal. 3 : 19, where the law of Moses is plainly meant. Sin was holding sway in the world (ver. 13), but tlic law cauic in be- side it incidentally and tributary to it. That the otfence, or trespass, might abound. Trespass here is a violafion of a specific law, and may be referred to Adam's first transgression, which was the root of all the sins of the race, or to the specific sins of the individuals of the race. Trespass is the outward ex- pression of sin (ver. 12) J the inward de- praved principle (next clause). A de- sign of the law is here given. The law is primarily designed to be obeyed. But in the plan of redemption of a fallen race it had an additional necessaiy de- sign, that the evils of our nature might be manifested, be brought out and ex- posed by their opposition to and viola- tion of a specific law, which is holy, righteous, and true (7 : 7-12; Oal. 3 :19: Matt. 10 : 34, 33). But w h e r e sin abounded, grace did much more ahonnd, abou)ided over and above it. An ultimate design or result of the law is here brought into view. How grace superaboundcd in Paul's own experi- ence (1 Tim. 1 : 13, 14). Thus the law in the purpose of God prepared the way for Christ and for the reception of the gospel (7 : 24, 25; Gal. 3 : 10. 24). [Ch. V. EOMANS 81 death, even so might "grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord. death, so also might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life, through Jesus Christ our Lord. a John 1 : 16, 17; Titus 2 : 11. 21. The thought of the preceding verse is continued, and sin and grace are contrasted. That as sin, reigned in death. Sin (ver. 12) is the real de- stroyer of man, the real antagonist of God's grace. Death is its result, its wages (6:23). So also grace might reign — hold sway, a conqueror, greater and stronger than sin and death (cer. 13, u). Through, by means of right- eousness, the righteousness revealed in the gospel (1 ^ i')- Grace reigns not only by accepting the believer as right- eous, and restoring him to the Divine favor, but also by maintaining in him holiness of heart and conduct, and leading him safely unto life eternal; and all this is effected through Jesus Christ our Lord. Notice how Paul closes this wonderful parallel and his wonderful experience {t:25) alike, through Jesus Christ our Lord, with whom the believer has a real, living, and spiritual union. Notice also that the last two verses of this chapter pre- pare the way for the two following chapters (6 : 1, 15; 7 : 7). Practical Remarks. 1. True peace with God can only come to the sinner through justification by faith in Jesus Christ (ver. 1 ; Eph. 2 : 14-16). 2. Future glory is the hope and joy of God's believing people (ver. 2 ; 8 : 18). 3. Joy in afflictions is a privilege and a precious boon of the child of God (ver. 3 ; 2 Cor. 4 : 17, 18). 4. The blessed results of a justified state are inseparably linked together and are developed from one another (ver. 1-5 ; Gal. 5 :22, 23; 2 Peter 1 : 5). 5. In the present condition of our race no character can become great without suffering (ver. 3-5 ; 1 Peter 1:6; Heb. 2 : 9, 10). 6. The hope of the believer is like an anchor ; that of the sinner like a spider's web (ver. 5 ; Heb. 6 : 19 : Job 8 : 14). 7. The love of God pervading the heart is an evidence of the presence of the Holy Spirit and of acceptance with God (ver. 5; 1 John 4 : 7-10). 8. It is the privilege of the believer to be assured of his own salvation (ver. 6-8 ; 1 John 3 : 14 ; Eph. 3 : 18, 19). 9. The love of God lies at the foundation of the plan of redemption, and of all our hopes (ver. 7, 8 ; 8 : 34-39 ; 1 John 4 : 19). 10. Redemption is not through the moral influence of Christ's example, teachings, and life, but through his blood (ver. 9 ; Heb. 9 : 22 ; Rev. 5 : 9). 11. The final perseverance of the saints, resting on God's infinite grace and love, is a doctrine of the Scriptures (ver. 9-11 ; John 10 : 25, 29 ; Isa. 49 : 15). 12. How terrible is sin, that in and through its one commission the whole race became estranged from God (ver. 12 ; 3:10-18). 13. Death like a tyrant holds sway over the bodies and souls of men, giving evi- dence of the presence, power, and vm- speakable evil of sin (ver. 13, 15 ; 8 : 6, 13 ; James 1 : 15). 14. "While God will judge men impar- tially, and ' render to every man accord- ing to his works,' yet in respect to certain general principles and conditions of our being, he deals with his creature man as a race, he regards humanity as a unit'' (A. N. Arnold). (Ver. 12-17 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 22.) 15. Christ was head of the race in that he created man in his own image and after his likeness (Gen. 1 : 26 ; John 1 : 1-3 ; Col. 1 : 16) ; and thus the race bears to him the relation of kinship (Acts 17 : 29 ; Heb. 2 : 11), he the head and they of like nature with him. Most fittingly therefore is Christ also the head of the re- deemed, who, in their salvation, more than overcomes their ruin in the fall (ver. 14-16 ; 8 : 18, 23 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 55-57). 16. The parallelism of what Adam and Christ have done for the race seems neces- sarily to imply the salvation of infants and of all who die before coming into a state of moral accountability. No one, we may well believe, will be held account- able for the sin of Adam, until he has made it his own by personal and actual sinning (ver. 14-21 ; comp. Mark 10 : 14 ; 82 ROMANS [Ch. VI. Sanctijficaiio7i ; the believer made holy by his union with Christ, who frees him from the power of sin. 6 WHAT shall we say then ? »> Shall we continue in sin, that grace may 2 abound? God forbid. How shall we, that are "dead to sin, *ilive any 6 WHAT then shall we say ? Are we to continue in sin, that grace may 2 abound ? Far be it ! How shall we, who died to sin, live any longer 63:8; Gal. 5 : 13 ; 1 Peter 2 : 16. c Col. 3 : 3 ; 1 Peter 2 : 24. d 1 Peter 4 : 1-3. Matt. 18 : 2 ; Deut. 1 : 39 ; Isa. 7 : 15, 16 : | Jonah 4: 11; Heb. 5 : 13, 14). 17. Both sin and salvation are two great fiicts in our world. All as they grow up exhibit early sinful traits. The gospel j saves and its offers are to all ; and who- | ever perishes, perishes through his own sin (ver. 15-19 ; Ps. 58 : 3 ; Rev. 22 : 17 ; Ezek. 18 :4, 20). 18. The fact that all are sinners and under condemnation, renders the work of Christ and a complete salvation a neces- sity (ver. 18, 19 ; Acts 4 : 12). 19. Every one should humbly accept the fact that he is a sinner, and gratefully embrace the means provided for his sal- vation (ver. 18-20 ; 2 Cor. 6:2; Acts 2 : 40). 20. As the law had an important work in the religious history of our sinful race, so it has in the religious experience of men in preparing them for the gospel (ver. 20; 3 :20; Gal. 3 : 24). 21. The triumphs of grace over sin are glorious. The gospel is more than suffi- cient to repair the ruins of the fall, and to raise the race to heaven. How eager should we be to enjoy its blessings ! What folly, what sin to neglect its provisions ! (Ver. 21 ; 1 Peter 1 : 10-12 ; Heb. 2:3.) CHAPTER VI. In this chapter, and the two succeed- ing ones, the apostle shows that the doctrine of salvation through free justi- fication by faith, so far from encoura- ging sin, insures the believer's personal holiness and final .salvation. The dis- cussion, while growing out of the doctrine of justification, is connected largely with the doctrine of sanctifi- cation. In this chapter, and as far as 7:6, Paul shows that gratuitous justification does not lead to sinful in- dulgence ; for the believer is united by faith with the ever-living Christ, with whom he has died to sin and risen to a new life, as illustrated in his baptism ( ver. 1-14 ) ; and, being no longer under law but under grace, he is no longer a serv- ant of sin but a servant of righteous- ness, and is constrained to loving obedience (ver. 15-2:^). This new life and its happy fruits are illustrated by a well-known principle of Jewish law (7:1-6). 1-23. The moeal influence of THE doctrine of salvation through gratuitous JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH IN Christ. This doctrine does not lessen the obligation or the incentives to holy living : Ijecause the believer has become dead to sin and has risen to a new life (ver. i-u); and because freed from the bondage of the law under which he was a slave to sin, he is now under grace with a spirit of obedience unto righteousness (ver. 15-23). 1. Thus iixY Paul had been dealing largely with the past ; now he turns to the future. What — in view of what he had said in 5 : 20, 21 — shall we say then ? ( Comp. 3 : 5 ; 4 : 1.) Shall we say, Let 'us continue in sin, or according to another reading, Arc ice to continue in sin that grace may abound ? A common objection to justification l)y faith apart from the works of the law, which Paul must often have met, was that it tended to immorality. This objection would be suggested anew ]>y the statement, "Where sin abounded, grace superabounded " (5:20). This had led some to charge them with say- ing, "Let us do evil, that good may come" (3:8). Some regard the ques- tion here as the language of an objector. This is not necessary. It is better to regard it as one which Paul had met in his own experience, and which he now uses in expostulating with believers against such an abuse of the doctrine. Paul proceeds to show that it does not encourage sin, nor weaken the incen- tives to holiness. 2. God forbid. Peri.sh the thought ! ( See on 3 : 4. ) He had already disclaimed Ch. VI.] ROMANS 83 3 longer therein? Know ye not, that « so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ ^were baptized into his 4 death ? Therefore we are s buried with him by baptism into death : that ^ like as Christ was raised up from the dead oy the glory of the Father, i even so we also should walk in newness of 3 therein ? Or, are ye ignorant, that all we who were baptized into Christ Je- sus were baptized into his death? ■i We were buried therefore with him through the baptism into his death? that as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, so we also might walk in newness of e 1 Cor. 12 : 13 ; Gal. 3 : 27. / Ver. 4, 5, 8 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 29 ; Gal. 2 : 20. g Col. 2 : 12, 13. ft 8 : 11 ; 2 Cor. 13 : 4. t 7 : 6 ; 12 : 1, 2 ; Eph. 4 : 22-24. it in 3 : 7, 8. How shall we that are dead, rather, that died, to sin live any longer therein ? The absurdity of remaining in sin is most strikingly shown. We having died to sin and yet live therein ? Impossible ! To have died to sin is to have utterly renounced it and forsaken it, and to be no longer under it as a ruling power. (Comp. Gal. 2 : 19.) In justification the be- liever also is separated from the guilt of sin (ver. 7; 1 Peter 2: 24). Accepting Christ as our Saviour and Lord, and consecrating ourselves to him, is re- nouncing allegiance to sin as our mas- ter ; and by virtue of our union with Christ, we are delivered from the domin- ion of sin (ver. 8-11). Paul does not yet refer to baptism, but to that spiritual change that preceded baptism. Bap- tism is a burial and has reference to death, but death precedes burial. The thought suggested by this question is illustrated and enlarged upon in the next nine verses. 3. Know ye not introduces an expression of earnest remonstrance. More exactly: Or, is it possible, that you are ignorant of the significance of your own baptism ? Surely you cannot be ignorant of its lessons. That so many of us, etc. — that all loe who were baptized into Christ Jesus, into a professed allegiance and subjection to and fellowship with Christ (Gai. 3:27). This was represented symbolically in their baptism, and truly so if they were what they professed. Were baptized into his death — for sin; into a pro- fessed conformity to his death, that as he "put away sin by the sacrifice of himself" (neb. 9 : 26), 'so we have died to sin, and put it away, as it were, from us. This we did symbolically and pro- fessedly, and truly so if we had really been regenerated. We should remem- ber that in the apostolic age baptism generally implied genuine conversion ; yet there were exceptions, as in the case of Simon Magus. Instead of into, some eminent scholars prefer to render unto, and it is so rendered in the mar- gin of the Improved Bible Union ver- sion. Thus baptized unto Christ means with distinct and exclusive reference to him as our Lord and Redeemer ; and unto his death, means with especial reference to his death as suflered for sin and for the believing sinner. Symbolic- ally "it is just as if, at that moment, Christ sulfered, died, and were buried for such a man, and as if such a man suffered, died, and were buried with Christ" (Bengel). (Gai. 2:19.) It is evident from this passage that baptism is an intelligent act on the part of the one baptized and that he cannot be an un- conscious infant ; and also that it does not confer regeneration, since that is symbolized by the act, and in the pre- ceding verse it is implied as possessed before the act. 4. The question of ver. 8 implies that they admitted the significance of their baptism. Therefore, it follows in view of this, we are, rather, were, buried with him, after the manner of his literal burial by or through the baptism into death, symbolically repre- senting that we were spiritually dead to sin. See on preceding verse. Burial is a consequent and proof of death, and it puts the dead out of sight. " Dead and buried," as we say. (Comp.johnii:i7.) There is a plain reference here to im- mersion as the act in baptism. So commentators generally. That like as Christ was raised up from the dead — in order that Christ in his resurrection also might be our exam- ple, so that ice also anight walk in newness of life, in a newer, higher course or manner of life. Christ was raised by, or th rough, th^ glory of the Father — that power which exhibits God's glory (icor. e.u, 2 Cor. 13 : 4 ; Col. 84 ROMANS [Ch. VI. 5 life. '' For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his deatli, we shall be also in tlie likeness of his resur- 6 rection : knowing this, that ' our old man is crucified witli hitn, that ™the body of sin might be destroyed, "that henceforth we should not serve sin. 7 For " he that is dead is freed from sin. 5 life. For if we have become united with the likeness of his death, we shall be with that of his resurrection 6 also ; knowing this, that our old man was crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, in order that we might no more be in bondage 7 to sin. For he that died has been jus- k Col. 3 : 1-4. I Gal. 5 : 24 ; Eph. 4 : 22 ; Col. 3 : 5, 9, 10. m 7 : 24 ; Col. 2 : 11. M John 8 : 34-36. o Ver. 2 ; 1 Peter 4:1. 1:11). God was glorified in Christ's resurrection (Johni7:i), It is the di- vine purpose that we should die that we might live, and so in our baptism we profess what it symbolically repre- sents — our death to sin and our resur- rection to a new life. 5. For, in confirmation of what has just been said, if we have been planted — rather, if we have become grown together, or united with the likeness of his death. This like- ness consists in being dead to sin, and in having had our corruption and wick- edness slain and buried, as it were, in Christ's tomb. We shall also be united with the likeness of his res- urrection, which will be shown in a new life consecrated to God. That the reference is to a new spiritual life on earth, and not to the future resurrection of the body, is evident from ver. 4. Two statements are made in tliis verse : First, that we have become like Christ in his death, further illustrated in ver. 6 and 7. Second, so we shall also be in his resurrection, further il- lustrated in ver. 8-11. Botli of tliese are put forth as true, it l)eing taken for granted that they were genuine Chris- tians. Schleiermacher has an eloquent discourse on " Christ's Eesurrection a Pattern of our New Life." See " Fish's Masterpieces." Vol. I., p. 52.5. G. KnoAvingthis — asserting a fact of experimental knowledge. The old man — tlie former self in our unre- newed state, in distinction from the new life, the renewed man (Coi.3:9, lO; Eph. 4 : 22-24 ; 2 Cor. .5 : 17). TllC rcmnauts and tendencies of the former are repre- sented elsewhere as still continuing in the believer, opposing the spirit and temper of the renewed heart, and strug- gling for the ascendency ('? : 17-20; 1 Cor. 9 ; 27: Gal. 5 : 17). Is — rather, was, crucified with him (o«i 2 20). The j)ain and shame of this mode of death well represented the pangs and self- abasement of Paul at his conversion (1 Tim. 1 : 13), aiul thc figure of such a death suggests how radical the change at conversion is. The old impulses and passions give way to new impulses and desires (2 cor. 5 : 15-17). The body of sin — sinful and ruled by sin, our sinful nature (8 : is; Coi. 3:5), might be destroyed, rendered inoperative and powerless; that its power might be abol- ished, done away, and as it were de- stroyed, in order that ice might no longer be in bondage to sin. Sin is personified as a master to whom we had once given willing service. ( Comp. Eph. 2 : 1-7.) 7. This verse is regarded as very difiicult, arising from its conciseness and axiomatic form. It may be more literally rendered, For he that died has been justified from sin. It is plainly added, as confirmatory of what the apostle had just said in ver. 6. Dr. A. N. Arnold refers this to Christ, who could be said to be justified from sin, when, having died on account of sin, he was raised to the right hand of God, "separated from sinners" (Heb. 7:26). This is true in a sense, but the reference seems to be, both in the preceding verse and at the beginning of the next verse, to the believer's death to sin, and it would naturally be the same in this. The statement of the next verse. If tee died with Christ, suggests a connection here between the believer's death to sin and Christ's death for sin. Enjoying the fruit of his atoning death, he h jus- tified, absolved, and separated from sin, as a ruling force, and accounted righteous. (Soeon 1 : n (3).) As sin is personified as a master throughout this passage (last verse), so here justi- fied from sin suggests a deliverance from the body of sin as a ruling power (vir. 14). And inferentially we may say, that as death changes the relation of a slave to his master, making him a free man, so the l)eliever's death t»» sin with Christ so changes his relation to sin Ch. VI.] ROMANS 85 8 Now P if Ave be dead with Christ, i we believe that we shall also live with 9 him : knowing that ' Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more ; death hath no more dominion over 10 him. For in that he died, » he died unto sin once : but in that he liveth, 11 t he liveth unto God. Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but '^ alive unto God through Jesus Christ our Lord. 8 tified from sin. And if we died with Christ, we believe that we shall also 9 live with him ; knowing that Christ, being raised from the dead, dies no more ; death has dominion over him 10 no more. For the death that he died, he died to sin once for all ; but the life 11 that he lives, he lives to God. Thus reckon ye also yourselves to be dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus. p Ver. 3-5 ; 2 Tim. 2 : 11, 12. s Heb. 9 : 25-28, q 2 Cor. 4 : 10-14. t See refs. Luke 20 : 38. r See refs. Ps. 16 : 9-11 ; Rev. 1 : 18. u 2 Cor. 5 : 15 ; Gal. 2 : 19, 20. that he is no longer its slave, but assured of perpetual life (ver. 8, 9). 8. Now — rather, And, continuing the same fact, if we died icith Christ, and adding an additional thought, growing out of it, we believe that we also shall live with him. Be- ing partakers of Christ's death, we are sure that we shall live with him, par- ticipate in his new and endless life both here and hereafter ( ver. ii-is ; 8 : i , 2, lo ; Gai. 2 : 20; 2 Tim. 2 : 11, 12 ; 1 Thess. 4 : 17). WemUSt not limit our idea of Christ's death to his physical sufferings (Heb. 5 : 7-9; Matt. 27 :46). 9. Knowing — introducing the rea- son for the statement of the last verse. Since we know that Christ being raised from the dead dieth no more ; death hath no more do- minion, rules over him no more. Christ's obedience and death were vol- untary. As connected with our race, and as making satisfaction to Divine holiness and justice, sin had dominion over him ( Joha lO : is ; Matt. 20 : 28 ; Phil. 2 : 7 ff. ) . His resurrection Avas a proof and a proclamation that the power of death was broken ( i : ^ ; i Cor. 15 : 55-57). 10. This verse explains and confirms the preceding. For in that he died — equivalent to For the death that he died. He died unto sin — on account of sin ; he l)ore the penalty of sin, which is death. Having sufiered that once for all, death has no more claim upon him (Heb. 7 : 27; 9 : 12; comp. Heb. 10 : io;ju(je3). It necds never to be re- peated. He can henceforth live unto God, enjoying his reward. But in that he liveth — But the life that he liveth, he liveth unto God. This does not mean that, in a sense, he did not live unto God while in this world, but his life was one of voluntary obedience to all the requirements of God, even unto death for the sins of men. Hav- ing fully satisfied the penal demands on account of sin, he has only to live ; and this life he lives to God, to glorify him ( Joiiu 17 : 1, 2), in bringing many sons to glory (Heb. 2:10), in putting all ene- mies under his feet, establishing and consummating his kingdom, which he Avill finally deliver up to God and the Father (i Cor. 15 : 24). 11. Application of the preceding verse. Likewise, in like manner with Christ, reckon ye also your- selves to be dead to sin. Chris- tians are dead to sin, not in the same sense that Christ was. He died on ac- count of sin and for sin (ver. 10), being himself without sin (1 Peter 2 : 22); Chris- tians die in renouncing and forsaking sin, and in this change of relation to it, through the death of Christ. Dying in tlieir stead, they are partakers of the benefits of his death. So tliat they are to consider themselves not only dead to sin, but alive to God, partakers of Christ's life (Heb. a : 14; 2 Peter l: 4; 2 Tim. 1 : 10). And this is through, rather in Jesus Christ, in felloAvship and union with hira. Thus it is in Christ that believers become dead to sin and alive to God (8: i, 2; 2 Cor. 5 :i7). And being thus united with Christ, he lives in them (Gai. 2:20). Alford remarks that in this chapter it is not Christ's Mediatorship, but his Headship which is made prominent. Our Lord — omit- ted by best authorities. Thus far Paul has shown that the believer's relation to Christ, and the consequent change ef- fected in him thereby, are diametrically opposed to the idea of continuing in sin that grace may abound ( ver. 1 ) . Baptism as a Figure. We may speak of baptism as a sign, an antitype, an emblem, or a symbol. An emblem is generally used as suggestive of some 86 ROMANS [Ch. VI. 12 » Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, J that ye should ()l)ey it in 13 the lusts "thereof ;' neither yield ye your » members as instruments of un- righteousness unto sin; but » yield 12 Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey its 13 desires; nor present your members to sin as weapons of unrighteousness ; * Ps. 19 : 13 ; 119 : 133. y Gal. 5 : 16, 24 ; 1 Peter 2 : 11 ; 4 : 2, 3. z 7 : 5, 23 ; 1 Cor. 6 : 15 ; Col. 3:5; James 4:1. a 12 : 1 ; 2 Chron. 30 : 8 ; 1 Peter 2 : 24. natural fitness ; a symbol is generally cliosen or agreed upon to represent something moral or spiritual by the figures or properties of natural things. The two may unite in one. Thus tlie bread and wine in the Lord's Supper are appropriate emblems of our Lord's body and blood, and his own chosen symbols of his sufterings and death. So the waters of baptism may be a fitting emblem of purification from sin, an emblematic washing away of sin, and Paul's chosen symbol of the believer's death and life to God. But to be more particular. (1) Bap- tism symbolizes the believer's union with Christ (" baptized into Christ "), the submerging of the whole man into the Christly spirit of a new life ; and thus united to the spiritual body of Christ he has put on the garb of Christ to wear it in the church of Christ (Gal. 3 : 27 ; 1 Cor. 12 : 13). (2) It Symbol- izes a burial with Christ — the believer's consciousness of a spiritual death and of a dying to all ungodliness, and of a burial to a sinful life, and a rising with Christ, a consciousness of the birth of a new life, henceforth to be lived unto God. (3) And growing out of this reference to the death and the resurrec- tion of Christy it symbolizes the believ- er's resurrection and blissful immor- tality. Baptism may be conceived of as a sign. As circumcision was a sign of a natural connection with Abraham and Israel, so baptism as an external rite is a sign or token of an outward profession of Christ and of connection with the Cliristian church. It cannot however be so truthfully spoken of as a seal. Circumcision was a seal of Abraham's faitli which he exercised before he was circumcised, a ])ledge and an assurance of the righteousness of faith (Rom. 4 : ii). So believers are sealed with Holy Spirit of promise, impressing the im- age of Christ on the soul, and skiving an assurance of an everlasting inheritance (Kph. 1 14 ; 4 : 30. Comp. 2 Tim. 2 : 19). Bap- tism is nowhere spoken of as a seal in the New Testament. As an antitype baptism is mentioned in 1 Peter 3 : 21. An antitype is that which corresponds to its type. Peter speaks of baptism as the antitype " after a true likeness," as the Revised version paraphrases it, answering or corresponding to the waters of the deluge which prefigured it in the Old Testament. Baptism symbolizes the resurrection of Christ, the foundation of the believer's hope, and, if truly received, is more than the putting away of the filth of the flesh ; it presup- poses and symbolizes all that a good conscience toward God requires, name- ly, a soul renewed and consecrated to him. 12. In this and the two following verses the apostle enforces the practical results of what he had just gone over. Let not sill therefore, in view of the fact that you are to account your- selves as dead to sin (ver. ii), reign as a king, in your mortal body, a body subject to death and in which death is at work. The efi'ects of sin and death were so marked and obvious in the body that Paul calls especial attention to it. That ye should obey the lusts, or de-Kires, thereof. The best critical text omits it in. The idea is, Let not sin, your former master, con- tinue to reign in your body, that ye should obey its inordinate and sinful appetites. " The bodily ajipetitcs are the fuel; sin is the fire" (Bengel). Rather in your new life let sin be ban- ished, and vour body be a temple of the Holy Spirit (l Cor. 6 :'l9). 13. Neither yield your mem- bers — the organs of the body, such as the tongue, eye, hands, and feet, imply- ing, however, the mental activities working with them. The figure of sin, as a king, is continued in this verse, who is waging war against righteous- ness, to whom is pre.sental the mem- bers of the body as instruments, or weapons, literally, heavy armor, of Ch. VI.] ROMANS 87 yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your mem- bers as instruments of righteousness 14 unto God. For sin shall not have do- minion over you : ^ for ye are not under the law, but under grace. 15 What then? Shall we sin, because we are not under the law, <=but under grace ? 16 God forbid. Know ye not, that "^to but present yourselves to God, as alive from the dead, and your members to 14 God as weapons of righteousness. For sin shall not have dominion over you ; for ye are not under law, but under grace. 15 What then? Are we to sin, because we are not under law, but under 16 grace ? Far be it ! Know ye not, that 6 7 : 4-11 ; 8 : 2. c Eph. 2 : 8-10. d John 8 : 31. righteousness. But yield, or pre- sent, yourselves to God, as those that are alive from the dead, as having become dead with Christ to sin, and living with him to God (Epu. 2 : 5, 6), and your members as weapo7is, or heavy armor of righteousness, to God. (comp. 12 : 1 ; 13 : 12.) There is HO middle ground in this service. Either sin or righteousness rules the man. The be- liever's service is also a voluntary serv- ice — present yourselves. The different tenses of the same verb is thus distin- guished by Bartlett ("Christian Scriptures ") : " Neither he ever present- ing your members unto sin, . . but once for all present yourselves unto God," etc. An excellent exhortation to inconstant Christians. 14. Paul presents the concluding and crowning argument of this discus- sion. Not only in view of what he had already said, but also for the reason about to be given, he asserts: For sin shall not have dominion over you, shall not have lordship over you ; sin is no longer to be your master. For ye are not v.nder law, through which is a knowledge of sin (3 : 20), and which even intensifies sin and causes it to abound (o : 20), but ye are under grace which reigns through righteous- ness, not only in the justification of the believer, but also in his sanctification (5 : 21). They were not under a system of law, but under a system of grace. It sounds like a Christian axiom. Law could only command, it could not effect reconciliation, nor give the spirit obedi- ence ; but grace through Jesus Christ effects the one with God and gives the other to man. Law had no power to deliver the sinner from the mastery of sin, but grace through a spiritual union with Christ frees the believer from the lordship of sin, and through motives of love and hope ensures grateful and cheerful obedience to God. The thought in regard to law is developed in chapter 7 ; that in regard to grace in chapter 8. This whole discussion was important in developing the gospel in its relation to the law and to meet needed instruction both among Jewish and Gentile con- verts. Paul wrote this Epistle at Cor- inth. He saw there how improper views had led into false liberties and wicked indulgences (1 Cor. 5 : 1-6 : 20). It was doubtless so elsewhere (Oai. 5:i3). It was necessary to check such tenden- cies, to define the Christian's relation to the law, to sin, to grace, and to holi- ness. 15. Paul proceeds to illustrate fur- ther the relation to sin under law, and to righteousness under grace, by the case of master and servant. He had shown that we cannot continue in sin, because we are dead to Christ ; he now proceeds to show that acts of sin are to be avoided, because we cannot serve two masters. What then are we to conclude ? Paul sees that an inference, directly opposite from what he was en- forcing, might be drawn from the statement he had just made. Shall we, rather. Are we, to sin, commit acts of transgression, because we are not under law but under grace ? This is more definite than to continue in sin, in ver. 1. This he repels at once, God forbid. Atvay the thought! There has been a ten- dency in every age to make the liberty of the gospel a license to sin. " Such has been the objection to the doctrines of grace in all ages. And the fact that this objection was made to Paul's teachings, proves that his doctrine is the same with that against which the same objection is still urged " (Hodge). 16. Know ye not — you surely know. The question is in the form that assumes an affirmative answer. That to whom ye yield, or present, your- 88 ROMANS [Ch. VI. whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey ; whether of sin unto death, or of 17 obedience unto righteousness? But God be thanked, that ye were the serv- ants of sin, but ye have obeyed from the heart <■ that form of doctrine which 18 was delivered you. Being then f made free from sin, ye became the servants 19 of righteousness. I speak after the manner of men, because ot the infirm- ity of your flesh : for s as ye have to whom ye present yourselves serv- ants unto obedience, his servants ye are whom ye obey ; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience luito 17 righteousness? But thanks be to God, that ye were servants of sin, but obeyed from the heart that form of teaching unto wliicli ye were deliv- 18 ered ; and being made free from sin, 19 became servants of righteousness. I speak after the manner of men, be- cause of the infirmity of your flesh e 2 Tim. 1 : 13-16. / See refs. John 8 : 32. g Ver. 13, 17. selves as bond-servants or slaves, to ' obey, etc. Paul appeals to a general and well-known fact. When any one enters into service, he binds himself to obedience to the one he serves. Whether . . . or. It must be to one, or to the other. He cannot serve two masters at the same time (Matt. 6 : 24). Unto death. The result of the serv- ice of sin, not merely physical death, ' but especially spiritual and eternal death. So the service of God results in righteousness, holy living, "the fruits of holiness" (ver. 22), embracing and ending in eternal life. Serving sin implies the practice of sin ; so the service of righteousness implies the practice of righteousness. 17. Assuming the full assent of his readers to what he had said, the apostle exclaims in application to them, But God be thanked that ye were the servants of sin, once yet no longer. Their servitude is viewed at a single glance, as in the past. And at the same glance he sees in glorious contrast a changed life of obedience unto right- eousness. That such a change had been eflfected, and that too, upon the slaves of sin by the grace of God, calls forth his hearty thanksgiving. Their terri- ble shivery made their deliverance and the gift of God the more conspicuous. But ye have obeyed, rather. But ye obeyed or became obedient when ye entered the state of grace ( ver. u), and be- came servants of righteousness (ver. is). And this obedience was willing, inward, and spiritual, from the heart. What they olieyed was that form of doctrine wliich was delivered you, rather, that form of teaching unto which ye nrre delivered by God at your conversion, and symbolically and pro- fessedly at your baptism. The form of teaching was that Christian faith and practice which Paul had received and taught. That form may be regarded, with Wordsworth and some others, as that mold of doctrine, or teaching, into Avhich (like molten metal) ye were de- livered, soft and ductile, yielding to the burning efficacy of the truth taught you. It was the model, the original pattern, " the gospel of that pronounced evangelical type, as distinct from Juda- ism, which Paul always preached" (Boise). 18. Closely connected with the pre- ceding verse. And — continuing the thought, being made free from sin— delivered and set at liberty from sin as a master, ye became servants {bond-servants or slaves) to right- eousness. Free yet slaves ! Yet in this consisted their highest freedom (John 8: 36. Comp. 1 Cor. 7 : 22). Sucll SCrvicC bciug hearty, willing, and elevating, it could not be expected that they would return to the master and the bondage from which they had been emancipated. In their new service they were enabled and obliged to live a life of piety. 19. The apostle apologizes for using such an illustration, especially for the phrase bond-servants or slaves to right- eousness. Slavery was terrible and well understood at Eome. I speak after the manner of men — as men usually do, in an imperfect way, in order that you may rightly contrast your present condition with your past, because of the infirmity'of your flesh. Some regard this as an intellectual infirm- ity ; others as a moral. Both seem to be included. By ireakness of the flesh Paul means, that they were yet carnal and sensuous, and unaccustomed to those spiritual views of divine subjects which would render unnecessary such illustrations drawn from earthly ob- jects and relations. (Comp. 5 : 12-u : 1 cor. Ch. VI.] ROMANS 89 yielded your members servants to un- cleanness and to iniquity unto iniq- uity ; even so now yield your members servants to righteousness unto holi- 20 ness. For when ye were ^ the servants of sin, ye were free from righteous- 21 ness. > What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed ? for ^ the end of "those things is death. 22 But now ' being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ™ye have your fruit unto holiness, and the 23 end everlasting life. For "the wages For as ye presented your members serv- ants to uncleanness, and to iniquity unto iniquity ; so now present your members servants to righteousness 20 unto sanctification. For when ye Avere servants of sin, ye were free as to right- 21 eousness. What fruit therefore had ye then in those things of which ye are now ashamed ? For the end of those 22 things is death. But now, being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit unto sanetifi- 23 cation, and the end eternal life. For h John 8 : 34. i 7 : 5. m Eph. 5:9; Phil. 1 : 11 ; Col 1 : 10, kVer. 23; 1 : 32. lYer. U, 18. n 5 : 12 I Gal. 6:7,8; James 1 : 15. 3:1.) He had used the word slave not because the believer is really a slave, but to make his meaning plain ; besides through their low spiritual condition, Christ's service might sometimes seem hard to them — more of a task than a privilege, performed more in the spirit of servitude than of liberty. All this thus far in ver. 19 is parenthetical. Paul now returns to develop his mean- ing as expressed in ver. 18, For, my meaning is, that as ye presented your members slaves to uncleanness — lustful, vicious sins, especially against one's self, and to iniquity — leading into iniquity — sins of lawlessness, espe- cially against God, so noiv present your members slaves to righteousness, leading unto sanctification. Sanctifica- tion, here and in ver. 22, means the elFect or result of consecration, holiness of heart and life. He would have them subject themselves as thoroughly to righteousness as they had formerly to wickedness. 20, In this verse to the end of the chapter the apostle enforces the ex- hortation of ver. 19, from the conse- quences attending each kind of service. For consider this fact that when ye were the servants, or slaves, of sin, ye Avere free so far as respects righteousness — of j^our own will and pleasure you acknowledged no al- legiance to, no control of, righteous- ness ; ye were free from any such rela- tion to righteousness, as is represented by the relation of slaves to their master. 21. What fruit therefore had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? What good did your freedom do you ? The answer im- plied is, None. You gained no advan- tage, you received no moral good. You now remember your service of sin with shame, and it yielded only death. Some end the question with then, thus, What fruit therefore had ye at that time? The answer is. Those things of which ye are now ashamed. This seems the more natural way of dividing the sentence. It is simpler and the thought is clearer. Fruit also is sometimes applied to that which is evil (7 : 5; Matt.? : IT-20; 12 : 33). For the end of those things is death — spiritual and eternal death, in contrast to eternal life (vor. 22), 22, But now— in contrast to your former state — being made free from sin as a master (see on ver. is), and be- come servants, or slaves, (tlie same figure continued) to God f ^■"- 1^), you have your fruit unto holiness, or sanctification, and the end ever- lasting life — spiritual and eternal life in contrast to death (ver. 21). No- tice Paul deals with the present time looking onward to the future and full consummation. Ye are having your fruit issuing into sanctifieation which is thus a progressive work, and as an end of all your fruit and fruitfulness, eternal life. We enjoy the beginnings of eternal life here (John 3 : 36: Heb. 12 : u)^ and its fullness hereafter (1 John 3: 2), " As when the soul is living in sin it is not obedient to righteousness, so, when it is living in righteousness it cannot be obedient to sin. For the two are contrary one to the other" (Abbott). 23. Paul restates what he had said in the two preceding verses, and he does it in such a way as to show the diifer- ence in the tAvo kinds of service which he had been contrasting. For, sum- ming up and confirming what had been said, the wages — the word in the original signifies the pay of a soldier, 90 ROMANS [Ch. VI. of sin is death ; but » the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord. the wages of sin is death ; but the gift of God is eternal life, in Christ Jesus our Lord. o5 : 17, 21 ; see refs. John 3 : 14-17 ; 1 John 5 : 11, 12. and also of a servant — the hire that sin pays is death, sinritual and eternal. But the gift of God — that which God bestows is not viewed as wages, but as a gratuitous favor, and that gift is eternal life, life in its highest and noblest sense, through, rather in, Christ Jesus our Lord. Christ is our life (Col. 3 : 3, 4), and we have eternal life by virtue of our union with him. Notice death is wages; life a gift. The sinner earns the one ; the believer receives the other. The service of sin is indeed slavery and ever downward ; the service of righteousness is ennobling and ever upward, developing through God's grace into the highest liberty and the noblest form of creative existence. No wonder that Paul apologizes (ver. 19) for applying the idea of slavery to such a service. In his entire self-surrender to God, and in his devotedness to right- eousness, the Christian was indeed as a slave, but in this very devotion and in this very relation he Avas to find his truest freedom, his highest exaltation, and the enjoyment of the crowning gift of God's favor. Notice al.so that the apostle ends this chapter the same as chap. 5. Whether he is ti*acing the results of justification or sanctification, he ends wfth Christ and the eternal life which comes through him. Practical Remarks. 1. We have in this chapter an antidote to antinomianism (ver. 2, 11, 12, 18, 22). 2. Any doctrine or system that encour- ages sin is not of God (ver. 1,2; Gal. 5 : 13, 16, 21; 6: 7). 3. It is a contradiction to profess to be a Christian and to live a life of sin (ver. 2, 3; 2 Cor. 6: 1.V17). 1. Baptism is an intelligent act, a pro- fession of Christ, a putting on of Christ (ver. 3; Gal. 3 : 27). .5. Baptism is a burial in water and a symbolical burial of the old man with Chri.st (ver. 4; Col. 2 : 12). 6. Baptism is a resurrection from its watery grave, and a symbolical resurrec- tion of the new man with Christ (ver. 5, 6 ; Acts 2 : 37, 38 ; 1 Cor. 10 : 1-4). Having ref- erence to Christ's resurrection it, through him, implies the believer's resurrection (1 Cor. 15 : 23, 29). 7. Our union with Christ is the source and the assurance of a life of holiness ( ver. 5-7 ; John 15 : 1-10) . 8. In our fallen state life comes through death (ver. 6-8; John 12 : 24). 9. Soul crucifixion attending repentance marks, in the experience of Christians, the beginning of their life with Christ (ver. 6 ; Acts 2 : 37, 38 ; 2 Cor. 7 : 11). 10. " To be in Christ is the source of the Christian's life ; to be like Christ is the sum of his excellence ; to be with Christ is the fullness of his joy " (Hodge). (Ver. 5-11 ; Col. 3 : 3, 4 ; 1 John 3 : 2.) 11. Christ has broken the power of sin and through him the Christian, though still weak and imperfect, is no longer under its dominion (ver. 9, 10 ; 7 : 25 ; Rev. 1 : 18; 1 Cor. 15 : 57). 12. Faith in Christ is the means of both our justification and our sanctification (ver. 11, 22, 23 ; Heb. 11 : 5, 6). 13. The Christian should guard against the sins of the body as well as of the soul (ver. 12; 1 Cor. 6 : 13 ; 9:27). 14. We should devote every member of the body— hands, feet, tongue, and eyes — to Christ and his service (ver. 13 ; 12 : 1). 15. The Christian is not under a legal system which brings only condemnation, but under a system of grace which brings justification, holiness, and the gift of God, eternal life (ver. 14, 15, 23; 8 : 3, 4; Acts 13 : 39). 16. They who hold that under grace the moral law is of no obligation pervert both the law and the gospel (ver. 15 ; 8 : 4; 13:8-10; Gal. 5 : 14). 17. Every one is a servant either of sin or of righteousness. There" can be no middle ground (ver. 16; Luke 16 : 13 ; Josh. 24 : 15). 18. Sin makes an infraction upon every law of our being. Its service is therefore slavery and its end death (ver. 17 : 19-21 ; I<:ph. 2 : 2, 3). 19. The service of righteousness accords Ch. VII.] EOMANS 91 Sanctiflcation ; the believer no longer under the Law which cannot save, illustrated by experience. 7 KNOW ye not, brethren, (for I speak Pto them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a 2 man as long as he liveth? For ithe woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth ; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of 7 OR, are ye ignorant, brethren (for I am speaking to men who know law), that the law has dominion over the 2 man for so long time as he lives ? For the married woman is bound by law to the living husband ; but if the* hus- band dies, she is loosed from the law p2 : 17. 18. q Gen. 2 : 23, 24 ; 1 Cor. 7 : 39. with our physical, mental, and spiritual constitution, and secures our highest good ; and thus, though service, it is con- nected with our highest freedom. But it must be " from the heart " (ver. 17 ; 8 : 14- 16; Gal. 5: 13, 16). 20. All thanks and praise to God if, once the servants of sin, we are now the serv- ants of God (ver. 17 ; 1 Tim. 1 : 12, 17 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 10). 21. In illustrating and enforcing doc- trine and practice we must often take into account the mental and spiritual weak- ness of men (ver. 19 ; 1 Cor. 3:1-3; 1 Peter 2:2; John 16 : 12). 22. We should expect the Christian to remember with shame the sinful fruits of his life in impenitence (ver. 21 ; Eph. 5 : 12; ITim. 1: 13). 23. Under the law sinners work for wages and they get what they earn. Under the gospel the Christian's service is a conse- cration ; salvation is through grace, and eternal life, the gracious gift of God (ver. 22, 23 ; 4 : 4 ; 8 : 13, 14 ; Eph. 2 : 8-10). CHAPTER VII. This chapter continues the discussion of the preceding chapter ; and first il- lustrates (ver. 1-6) the believer's changed relation from law to grace by the law of marriage. He is thus devoted to Christ's spiritual service. Incidental questions then arise (ver. 7, i3)^ regard- ing the law, which he answers and il- lustrates from his own experience, both in his unregenerate and regenerate state, showing that sin was the great troubler of his heart, and that the evil is not in the law but in man's corrupt nature : that the law is alike powerless both for man's justification and sancti- fication, and that deliverance can come only through Jesus Christ (ver. 7-25). 1-6. The believee's condition, not under law but under grace, illus- trated BY A familiar PRINCIPLE OF THE LAW OF MARRIAGE. The be- liever is made dead to law that he may be united to Christ. 1. KnoAV ye not — or, areye ignorant — an expression of earnest expostula- tion, as in 6 : 3, in support of the state- ment in 6:14. The latter part of chap. 6 is parenthetical. Having answered the objection, " Are we to sin because we are not under law, but under grace " (6 : 15) , Paul now returns to the thought, "Sin shall not have dominion over you, for ye are not under law, but under grace" (6:u). It was a principle fa- miliar to both Jew and Gentile, that death dissolves all legal ties. Or, if you are disposed to doubt that you are released from the law, am I to suppose you are ignorant, etc. Brethren and 7»?/ brethren (ver. 4), addressed to the whole church, Jew and Gentile. For I speak to them that know, or are acquainted ivith, law. The principle he is about to state was a general legal principle, recognized both by Roman and Jewish laAv, but especially by the latter ; and so the law^, with undoubt- ed reference to the ^losaic law, hath dominion over the man, the human being, male or female, for so long a time as he liveth. 2. Having stated the general prin- ciple, he now illustrated it by a simple case. For, in confirmation and illus- tration, the woman that hath an husband, rather, is subject to a hus- band, that is, a married woman, is bound by law to the living husband, while he lives (1 Cor. 7 : 39). But if the husband die, she is loosed, pitt be- yond the operation of the la'W binding her to her husband. She is no longer under the influence of that law, or in 92 ROMANS [Ch. VII. 3 her husband. So then ^if^ while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress : but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law ; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. 4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become * dead to the law by the body of Christ : ' that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should " bring 5 forth fruit unto God. For when we were » in the flesh, the motions of sins, y which were by the law, ^did Avork in our members » to bring forth fruit unto 3 of the husband. So then if, while the husband is living, she is married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress; but if the husband dies, she is free from the law, so that she is no adulteress, though she is married to another man. 4 Wherefore, my brethren, ye also were made dead to the law through the body of Christ, that ye might be married to another, to him who was raised from the dead, in order that we 5 might bear fruit to God. For when we were in the flesh, the passions of sins, which were through the law, wrought in our members to bear fruit unto r Matt. 5 : 32. « 8 : 2 ; Gal. 2 : 19, 20 ; Eph. 2 : 15 ; Col. 2 : U ; 1 Peter 2 : 24. M See refs. 6 : 22. a: 8 : 5-8 ; Eph. 2:3. y 3 : 20 ; 5 : 20. a 6 : 21, 23 ; James 1 : 15. ( 2 Cor. 11 : 2 ; Eph. 5 : 22-32. x Ver. 8-13 ; 6 : 13. any way affected by it. The principle is, that the relation is dissolved by the death of either party. But as believers are the bride of Christ, and are so rep- resented elsewhere, their relation to the law and to Christ, is more aptly repre- sented here by that of the wife to her hu.sband (Eph. 5 : 23, 24; John 3 : 29 ; Rev. 2 : 2,9). 3. So then, in view of what I have just said, if while the husband liv- eth she be married to another man she shall receive the name of an adulteress. But if the husband die, she is free from the law, relat- ing to husband and wife, that she may tiot he an adulteress, etc. Paul now has stated the principle and given a particular illustration. In the appli- cation he uses the single fact, that death dissolves legal ties. As death dissolves the relation between husband and wife, so the believer's death in Christ dissolves his relation to the law, to which he was subject as the wife to her hus})and, till death dissolved the connection (vcr. 4-6). In our application we must beware and not go beyond Paul. In so doing we may draw analo- gies that Paul never intended. 4, Therefore, my brethren, ye also, as in the case of the wife from her husband (vor. 2, 3), vrre made dead to the law, released from it by death, through the body of Christ. It was in his body that he suffered the penalty of sin ( Col. 1 : 21, 22 ; 1 Peter 2 : 24 ; Kph. 2 : 15 ; Heb. 10: 10). Evcn tlic mental sufferings of our Lord were connected with, and outwardly manifested through his bod- ily sufferings (Luke 22 : 44; Matt. 27 : 46). That ye should — expresses the design and end in view. In order that ye might be married to another, than the law, to him who was raised from the dead. They had become dead to the law through the death of Christ in order that they might be united to Christ under a new bond of love and obedience, expressed under the figure of marriage ( Eph. 5 : 23, 32. comp. 6 : 4, 9, 10) . And all of this, dead to the law and married to Christ, was for this purpose, that we might bring forth fruit unto God. Notice the apostle includes him- self. Fruit is the natural result, it is God's design (Johni5 : 2-h). Our union with Christ is an assurance that we will not present ourselves to sin, but will bring forth fruit to God. See Gal. 5 : 22, 23 for the kind of fruit. It does not appear to have been Paul's design to represent "fruit" here under the figure of offspring. 5. In this, and the following verse, Paul confirms what he had just said, contrasting and stating more fullj' the difference lietween their present and former relation. He had hinted at it in the last clause of 6 : 14; and in the rest of this chapter he discusses it more fully. For Avhen we were in the flesh, in our natural, unrenewed state (.ioiin3:6), slavcs to siii and rebellious against God's will, the motions, the passions of sins, that is, the sinful pas- sions, Avhich were excited by the holy restraints and requirements of the law, did work in our mem- bers (6: 13) that we should hring forth Ch. VII.] ROMANS 93 6 death. But now we are delivered from the law, b that being dead wherein we were held ; that we !sin revived, and I died : 10 and the commandment, ^ which was ordained to life, I found to be unto have known sin, unless through law ; for I should not know coveting, if the law did not say. Thou shalt not covet. 8 But sin, finding occasion through the commandment, wrought in me all manner of coveting. For apart from 9 law, sin is dead. And I was alive apart from law once ; but when the commandment came, sin revived, 10 and I died. And the commandment which was unto life, that I found to be e See refs. Exod. 20 : 17. / Ver. 13, 17 ; 5 : 20. i Ver. 8, 21-23. g James 1 : 14, 15. ft 4 : 15 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 56. k See refs. Luke 18 : 5. influence are holy and good, and that the evil is in us. In this verse he says it was the law that taught him what sin is. Nay, rather, But, I had not known sin, except through the law ; for I had not known lust, evil desire or coveting, except tlie law had said. Thou shalt not covet (Exod. 20 : 17). He would not have known sin as sin, nor regarded it as such, except through the law. For example, it was the law that showed him the sin of coveting, both as a matter of judg- ment and of experience (next verse). 8. But sin. Notice that sin here is more than an isolated transgression. It is personified, and means the de- pravect principle or tendency in man's moral nature. It also includes to a greater or less extent a sense of guilt, and the painful consciousness of wrong. But sin, the evil principle within me, taking, or finding, occasion through the commandment, which forbade the natural but wrong desire, defining its character, showing that to be sinful which otherwise might have been regarded as natural and innocent, w^rought in me all manner of concupiscence, of evil desire or coveting. What this evil principle had prompted me to do without regard- ing it as wrong, now, when enlight- ened by the commandment, it still prompts me to do, with the knowl- edge that it is sinful. And this ex- tended to all evil desires of every kind. The commandment only forbade ; it did not give power to refrain. For apart from ^ law, sin is dead. Where there is no law to fix and define particu- lar acts of transgression, and hence no intentional violation of law and right, sin is dead, dormant and has no life, so to speak ; there is no sense of sin and of guilt. The ey\\ in the heart is com- paratively inactive, until excited by the law's restraints. It is natural for the evil heart to strive for what is for- bidden, and to desire what is denied (Prov. 9:17. Comp. 1 Cor. 15 : 56). What is true of the written law, is true also of the inner law of man's moral natui'e. (See 2 : 14, 15.) 9. The last clause of the preceding verse Paul corroborates from his own experience. For, rather. And, I Avas alive — ivas living, having a sense of personal rectitude and a feeling of secu- rity, peaceful and self-satisfied, with- out, or apart from, the law once, before the law with its spiritual and heart - searching requirements came home to my conscience. He cannot mean that he was not under the law or ignorant of it, for he knew it from childhood , but that he was insensible to its spirituality and to the extent of its requirements. Once is general and in- definite, and refers to the period before conversion, and may include both the innocent period of childhood and also that of his Pharisaic self-righteous- ness and blindness to the law. But when the commandment — some particular requirement, like that men- tioned in ver. 7 — came, vividly and powerfully to my consciousness and conscience, sin revived — sprang into life, being no longer dead — and I died, I lost my personal sense of recti- tude and feeling of security, and under a sense of sin I was conscious of guilt and exposure to Divine wrath. He found the law exceeding broad and far too strict for him. And this may have occurred repeatedly, as in the experi- ence of most unconverted persons. 10. And the commandment which w^as ordained to life, rather, ivhich was unto life, designed originally for it and leading to it. The 96 ROMANS [Ch. VII. 11 death. For isin, taking occasion by i the commandment, "• deceived me, and 12 by it slew mc. Wherefore •> the law U holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. 13 » Was then that which is good made death unto me ? i God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working deatli in me by : that which is good ; that sin by the I commandment miglit become exceed- i 11 unto death. For sin. finding occasion through the commandment deceived 12 me, and tlirough it slew me. So that the law is holy, and the command- ment holy and righteous and good. 13 Did then that which is good become death to me ? Far be it ! But sin, that it might be shown to be sin, by work- ing death to me through that which is good ; that sin through the command- ment might become exceedingly sin- l Vlt. 8, 13. m Eph. 4 : 22 ; Ht-b. 3 : 13. n Ver. 14 ; Ps. 19 : 7-9 ; 1 Tim. 1 : 8. o Ver. 7. law was given that man might know (iod's will, and doing it enjoy his favor. A perfect life and perfect obe- dience would have insured life and well-being (Luke lO: 28). I found to be unto death — leading into death, into a conscious loss of God's favor and of self-righteous peace and security, in- to a conviction of sin and of exposure to the Divine wrath. 11. The apostle explains how in his experience he found the commandment to be unto death. For sin taking, or finding, occasion throngJi the com- mandment — as in ver. 8 (which see). Deceived and seduced me. Sin, personified under the figure of an enemy, used the commandment as a basis and means of temptation, as the serpent did to Eve (Gen. 3 : 1, 4, 5), and as Satan did to Christ (Matt. 4:6) and thus lured him on from the rignt way to destruction (2Cor. ii:3). And by it slew me — destroyed his false security and his sense of rectitude, as in ver. 9. Thus the effect of the law upon his conscience was to di.sclose his actual condition, and cut ofi^the hope of God's favor, without providing a remedy. He saw himself a lo.st sinner under the condemnation of God's holy law. 12. From these facts in Paul's ex- perience, l)y which he showed that the law brought sin to view in its true char- acter (v(-r. 8) and aroused his conscience to a sen.se of sin and guilt (ver. 9-11), it follows that the law is not to blame, that it is not sin, nor the colleague of sin, but the very opposite, ^there- fore, or, ,So that, the law, as a whole, is holy in its own nature and as a revelation denianding holiness, and the comm;indment, any particulai- command in the law is holy, being of the same in nature as the law itself, and just, righteous, in its claims and sanctions, and in its relation both [ to God and men, and good, .salutary I and beneficial in its aims and tenden- ' cies. 13. The statement that the com- mandment was good might appear in- consistent with the statement in ver. 10, that he had found the command- ment to be unto death. Paul therefore resumes the thought and anticipates an objection. Was then that which was good made death to me, or. Did it then become death to me? Was it the direct and immediate cause of this death of which I speak ? This he most emphatic- ally denies. Let it not be thought of! But sin became death unto me, that it might appear sin, and be shown to be sin, by working out death to me through that Avhich is good ; that sin through the commandmeni, which in its nature, aims, and tendencj- is good, might become exceeding, or beyond measure, sinful. The com- mandment furnished the ground or oc- casion for the inward depravity to manifest itself, and to show outwardly its malignant character, by making such base use of that which is good and bringing forth such disastrous results. The law gave the knowledge of sin (3 : 20), defined transgression (4 : 15), and brought wrath and condemnation. Thus the law led on to death ; but it was sin that caused the death, and thus in the light of the good, in opi)osition to the good, and in the perversion of the good, it showed its true nature and real character as sm, pre-eminently sin- ful. 14. There is manifestly a change in this verse in point of view. The change to the present tense is surely not acci- dental, nor merely rhetorical ; nor is it to ho explained merely by the vividness of Paul's c()nce])tion. The most natu- ral reason is that he includes his present state as a Christian. His vividness Ch. VII.] ROMANS 97 14 ing sinful. For we know that Pthe law is spiritual : but I am carnal, i sold 15 under sin. For that which I do I allow not : for >" what I would, that do 16 I not ; but what I hate, that do I. If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good. 14 ful. For we know that the law is spir- itual ; but I am carnal, sold under sin. 15 For what I perform, I know not; for not what I wish, that do I practice ; 16 but what I hate, that I do. But if what I wish not, that I do, I consent to p Matt. 5 : 22, 28 ; Heb. 4 : 12. q Ver. 23 ; 1 Kings 21 : 20, 25 ; 2 Kings 17 : 17. r Gal. 5 : 17. would naturally increase as he pro- gressed from past to present experience. The train of thought in ver. 14-16 ac- cords with such a transition to his re- newed state. The sentiment in this verse can be applied, though not in the same degree, to both the renewed and unrenewed man, and appears to be so expressed as not to exclude either. This was perfectly natural in such a transi- tion. While it is true that the natural man sins against his better judgment and conscience, it is true in a higher sense of the renewed man, and it is evi- dent from what follows that the apos- tle's mind was fixed more directly on the latter ( ver. is, 22, 25 ) . See discussion at the beginning of this section. For intro- duces the reasons why the results stated in the preceding verse necessarily take place, namely, That the law and its subjects are different in their natures ; the requirements of the former do not accord with the nature of the latter, hence a conflict. For we, as Chris- tians, know that the law is spirit- ual in its quality, nature, and charac- ter, being a transcript of God's holy will, requiring spiritual service and spiritual purity. But I am carnal, fleshly, living in the flesh, being more or less under its influence, having fleshly appetites and passions to con- tend against, and to lead me astray. Paul here points to his human nature apart from divine grace. That he could thus refer to himself as a Christian is evident, for he addresses the Corinthi- ans "as carnal, as babes in Christ" (1 Cor. 3:1), There are two adjectives in Greek, derived from the noun mean- ing flesh, differing in form only by a single letter and by the position of the accent, the one referring more to flesh as the material, fleshy (2Cor. 3:3)^ the other to the qniAiW, fleshly (1 Cor. 9 : 11). The former, according to most manu- scripts, is used here and in 1 Cor, 3:1, and 2 Cor. 3:3; the latter in 15 : 27 ; 1 Cor. 3 : 3 ; 9 : 11 ; 2 Cor. 1 : 12 ; 10 : 4 ; Heb. 7 : 16, and 1 Peter 2 : 11. In later Greek the forms were often confounded and there appears to have been some confusion in their use, so that the dif- ference in their meaning was not always marked. Thus in 1 Cor. 3 : 1 the first is applied to the Corinthian Christians, and immediately in ver. 3 the second is twice applied to them in about the same sense. "There is," says Peof. Boise, "no important distinction be- tween them. See Liddell and Scott." Sold under sin, having been sold un- der sin in his past state, the result of the bondage still continuing. Notice how applicable this is to the renewed man, for it may denote unwilling bond- age; and every Christian is more or less an unwilling servant to sin, while the unrenewed man is its willing slave. Paul's terrible conflicts with the re- mains of sin in his o^m heart makes him use strong language. 15. Paul confirms and explains what he had just said, continuing the figure of one in bondage, " sold under sin." For that Avhich I do, or perform in action, I alloAV not — rather, I know not, I do it unknowingly, like a slave who acts blindly at the bidding of an- other — the act is unintelligent, and my soul does not recognize it as really its own. For Avhat I would, etc. — rather. For not ivhat Itcish do I p7'ac- tise, the practice of my life by no means comes up to my desire ; but what I hate, that do I — I find that I am do- ing acts that I hate. All this is the evidence of the power of sin in me. Many Christians have found these words descriptive of their inward conflicts. The struggle is between the better self, the renewed nature and the lower na- ture, the remains of sin, as appears from what folloAVS (ver. 17 ff). 16. Paul clinches the argument and exculpates the law. If then I do that w^hich I would not, or, which I ivish not, I consent to the laAV that it is good — my unwillingness to do 98 ROMANS [Ch. \IL 17 Now then it is no more I that do it, 18 'but sin that dwelletli in me. For I Icnowthat eut with me; but to perform that 19 wliich is good is not. For the good that I wish, I do not ; but the evil that 20 I wish not, that I practice. But if what I wish not, that I do, it is no t See refs. Gen. 6:5; Ps. 51 : 5 ; Isa. 64 : 6. « Ver. 15, 25. wrong bears witness to the excellence of the law. It is a recognition and a confession that the law is right. It also indicates that there is a better na- ture in me, distinct from and in conflict with the old nature of sin which dwells in me (ver. i7j. 17. In this and the three following verses, the aj)ostle shows that it is the influence of indwelling sin which pre- vents his perfect obedience to God's law. Now then, or, But note, as things now are, suggestive of the fact that there was a time when there was not this inward struggle, it is no more I that do it — better, it is no longer I that perform it, my true and better self is not the prime mover, but sin that dwelleth in me. The word translated do, or perform, means to work out, and expresses here tlie primary efiicient cause. Indwelling sin, the old man, is the primary cause of disobedience, and this the apostle proceeds to illustrate in ver. 18, 19. 18. For I know, by experience, that in me, that is, in my flesh, in my lower carnal nature, dwelleth, referring to the language of the pre- ceding verse, no good thing. This shows tliat Paul recognized in himself both a higher spiritual, and a loAver carnal nature. He further explains : For to will, better, toteish, is pres- ent with me, but how to per- form, etc., rather, but to perform that which is good is not present with me. I find not — should be omitted, accord- ing to the best authorities. The verb to will is found seven times in this section, and is translated, would ex- cept here. It may be rendered inll or wish. Its contrast to / hate (ver. i5) in- dicates that its meaning partakes large- ly of the emotions, the desires, hence to wish. " This is not the full deterwi- nation of the will, the standing with the bow drawn and the arrow aimed. but rather the inclination of the will — the taking up the bow and pointing at the mark " (Alfoed). 19. Explains the preceding clause. For the good that I wish, I do not, / am not doing, but the evil which I do not wish, that I practise. This is popular language of every-day life, intended to be understood by the common mind. The apostle does not say that he ever did any particular act which his will opposed at the moment of doing it. This would be impossible in any one. He is rather looking at the habit and currents of his life, his desires for the good which he failed to attain on account of the inroads of evil. And what was this good ? Was it not conformitj" to the Divine will, perfect obedience to the divine law? Every failure would lead him to say, " The good I wish, I do not." On the other hand, any departure from this perfect standard, any wandering of the aftec- tions from God, any conformity to the world, would lead him to say, "The evil I wish not, that I practise," " What I hate that do I." The Chris- tian is more or less liable to such ex- periences. Bunyan thus expresses him- self: " The evil that dwells in me is so universal, that as sure as there is any motion to what is good, so sure is evil present with us. Desires come warm with the Spirit and grace of God in us, but as warm waters running through cold pipes, or as clear water running through dirty conveyances, so our de- sires are chilled and defiled by the cor- ruptions of the fle.sh " (Condensed from " Devotional Works," pp. 210-215). 20. A conclusion drawn from the two preceding ver.ses, thereby restating and confirming what ho had said in ver. 19. For the good that I wish, I do not; but the evil I wisli not, that I practise. There has been an advance in thought since ver. 17. The Ch. VII.] ROMANS 99 21 ill me. I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with 22 me. For I ^delight in the law of God 23 after y the inward man : but '■ I see an- other law in *my members, warring against the law of my mind, and '"bringing me into captivity to the law 24 of sin w^hich is in my members. =0 more I that perform it, but the sin that 21 dwells in me. 1 hud then the law, that, when I wish to do good, evil is 22 present with me. For I delight in the 23 law of God after the inward man. But I see a different law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members a: Ps. 1 : 2 ; 19 : 7-11 ; 119 : 97-104. o6 : 13, 19. y 2 Cor. 4 : 16 ; Eph. 3 : 16. zS:2; Gal. 5 : 17. 6 Ver. 14. c 1 Kings 8 : 38. apostle makes it clearer, that it is the higher and better self that wishes the good, and that it is the lower self in which sin rules. And so the way is prepared for the important conclusion in the next verse. 21. General conclusion of ver. 17- 20. I find then the law under which I stand, this law of my being, that when I ivish to do good, evil is present with me. Some suppose the law of Moses to be meant. But most expositors take law in the sense of principle, which is the most natural and simplest interpretation. Paul found himself subjected to this law of his being — that opposite principles or ele- ments were co-existing in him, and con- tending for the mastery. This is true in a certain sense of the unconverted who sin against their reason and con- science, but it is true in a higher de- gree of the Christian. That this is its reference is evident from the next verse. 22. Confirming and explaining what he had just said. For I delight, or take pleasure, in the la\v of God, that law which is from God and of which he is the author, after, or ac- cording to, the inward man. Notice that delight is a stronger Avord than con- sent in ver. 16. It expresses the pleasure that the renewed soul takes in God's commandments. Thus the psalmist ex- claimed, " Oh, how love I thy law ! I will delight myself in thy statutes" ( Ps. 119 : 16, 97 ) . This emotiou of pleasure is very difierent from that feeling of dread of the law in the unrenewed heart, which sometimes arouses a con- flict. Imvard man is a Pauline phrase, found besides here in 2 Cor. 4 : 16 and F^ph. 3 : 16, in both of which the Chris- tian is spoken of in reference to his in- telligent moral nature, acted upon, re- newed, and strengthened by the Holy Spirit. And in this verse the imvard man must be in a renewed state in order to delight in the law" of God. Moreover, inward man is in opposition to members in the next verse, which appears to have the same application as " flesh " in ver. 18, which means his lower, carnal nature, and therefore in- ward man naturally refers to his higher or moral nature as renewed. ( Comp. 1 Peter 3:4.) See also uext verse on mind. 23. Bu*, alas! I see another and different laAV in my members (ver. 5: 6 : 13) warring against the law of my mind. Members are properly the limbs and organs of the body, but since moral actions cannot be ascribed to the material members of the l^ody the word takes a figurative sense like "flesh," meaning the lower, unsanctified pro- pensities of our natures. It is used in opposition to imvard man of the last verse and of mind in tliis verse. The laiv i)i my members is the la\v of sin Avhich is in my members, the prin- ciple of evil (ver. 21) which still has a seat and exercises power in the tenden- cies and remaining corruptions of my nature. The knv of my mind is the opposite of "the law in my mem- bers," and refers not to the law of God but rather to that principle (ver. 21) that has its seat, and exercises control in the mind, in delighting in and serving the law of God (ver. 22, 25), In opposition to "my members" my mind — strictly my reason or understanding — has a wider reference to the inward man (ver. 22). According to Eph. 4 : 2.3 the mind is subject to the renewing of the Holy Spirit. In ver. 25 it is opposed to " the flesh," the lower sinful propen- sities. The manifest reference there- fore is to the renewed or sanctified na- ture. The Christian goes against the dictates of his enlightened reason and conscience when he yields to the lower sinful propensities. Pagan and Pla- 100 ROMANS [Ch. VII. wretched man that I am ! Who shall deliver me from in Christ Jesus, who 'walk not after 2 the flesh, but after the Spirit. For ^ the law of ' the Spirit of life in Christ 8 THERE is therefore now no con- demnation to those who are in Christ 2 Jesus. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus set me free from g John 3 : 18, 36 ; 5 : 24. h John 15 : 4 ; Phil. 3:9. i Gal. 5 : 16, 19-25. * 6 : 18, 22 ; John 8 : 36. I Ver. 10, 11 ; John 7 : 38, 39 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 45 ; 2 Cor. 3 : 6. ther could his good resolutions save him (ver. 14, 18, 24). 24. The Christian's salvation and vic- tory over sin are only through Jesus Christ (ver. 25 ; 8 : 37 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 57). 25. The Christian finds his greatest enemy in his own heart (ver. 23-25). 26. If the Christian must meet such conflicts, how helpless the sinner (ver. 24, 25; 1 Peter 4: 18). CHAPTER VIII. Paul had presented the Christian with the remains of sin in his heart, in rehition to the law ; he now proceeds to view him in relation to grace, free from condemnation, a spiritual child of God, whose Spirit dwells within him, produc- ing and maintaining both purity of life and right aflections toward God ( ver. 1-17 ). True, all God's children suffer here, yet these sufferings are not in- consistent with their sonship. Hav- ing suffered with Christ they shall be glorified with him. Thus their suf- ferings will be outweighed by the glory that will result from them ; and so work for their good, according to the will and the high purpose of God (ver. 17-30). The final issue is thus as- sured. God is for us, and nothing can break that bond, of his own will and love, between him and us (ver. 31-39). The apostle treats here of sanctification in the believer, but as inseparably con- nected with his justification. The chap- ter really presents the results of the apostle's discussion thus far. 1-17. No CONDEMNATION NOW RESTS ON THE BELIEVER. Christ has delivered us from the law of sin and death, and brought us into the new relationship of s])i ritual children to God. What the law could not do, (Jod has accomplished by Christ, under the guidance of the Spirit in us (ver. 3-8). Believers are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit ; and the Spirit of Christ is a Spirit of life, which ends in a glorious resurrection of the body (ver. 9-11). ^Xe are therefore not debtors to live accord- ing to the flesh, but led by the Spirit we are sons of God and sure of the glory to come. Having received the spirit of sonship, we have become heirs of God and joint-heirs with Christ (ver. 12-17). 1. There is therefore — in view of the whole discussion thus far, espe- cially 5 : 1 to 7 : 6, and of the deliverance through Jesus Christ (7:25). The dis- cussion in 7 : 7-25 is however somewhat incidental, and complete in itself, and ends with the assertion that the struggle of the soul still exists. The eighth chapter does not suppose the struggle ended, but rather its continuance with faith and hope, led on and invigorated by the Holy Spirit. It is a life con- flict, but a successful one (1 cor. 9 : 26, 27; Phil. 3 : 10-16 : 2 Tim. 4 : 7, 8) . NOW — Ulldcr the gospel. No — emphatic. From the very nature of the ease there can be no condemnation, it is not to be thought of. Condemnation — condemnatory sentence or judgment resulting from sin ; suggested by 5 : 16, 18, where the word here used, is only found else- where in the New Testament. In Christ Jesus — in fellowship witli him (6 : 11 : 12 : 5: 2 Cor. 5 : 17. Coinp. Eph. 5 : 30). The phrase expresses our relation to God, which relation the apostle devel- ops in the next seven verses. Such shall not come into condemnation, but are pas.sed from death unto life " (John 5: 24. Coiiip. ver. 34) . MllO AValk . • . Spirit. This sentence l)el(>ngs to ver. 4, and is omitted here by the best text, 2. For — introduces the reason of the foregoing statement. For the law of the Spirit, the rule and princijile by which the Spirit works, ])ro(lucing holy love and obedience. Of the .Spirit — the Holy Spirit, who is the giver of spiritual and eternal life (John 7 : 39; i Peter 1:2; Kom.5: 18). The Holy Spirit ap" Ch. VIII.] ROMANS 108 Jesus hath made me free from the law 3 of sin and death. For ™ what the law could not do, in that " it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son "in the likeness of sinful flesh, and p for sin, i condemned sin in 4 the flesh: rfhat the righteousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. 3 the law of sin and death. For— what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh — God, sending his own Sou in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin, condemned sin in the 4 flesh ; that the requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not according to the flesh, but according TO 3 : 20 ; Gal. 3 : 21 ; Heb. 7 : 18, 19. n 7 : 5-11. 2 1 Peter 4:1,2. o Phil. 2:7; Heb. 2 : 17. r Col. 1 I 22; Jude 2-4. p Heb. 10 : 1-14. pears to be meant, as it is the reference and meaning of the word generally throughout the whole chapter. In Christ Jesus — the believer's union and relation to him. (seeon ver. i.) Hath made me free — set me free, referring to a definite past time, when he was justified and accepted in Christ. The same thought as expressed in 7 : 4-6. From the laAV of sin and death — the outer law of works, whether it is the Mosaic law or any code of morality and ceremony on which a person de- pends. Anj^ such law leads to sin and death, and is incapable of producing holiness of heart and life (2 Cor. 3:6: Gai. 2 : 19, 20) . Paul looks back to his justifi- cation when he was delivered from the condemning power of the law because Christ had satisfied all its claims, and at the same time he views the working of the Spirit who dwells in us. Both justification and sanctification are es- sential to salvation (ver. 4). 3. For — introduces another consider- ation, expressed in this verse and the next, in support of the statement in ver. 1. It is thus confirmatory of the preceding verse. What the laAV could not do — it could not render satisfaction for sin and free man from its guilt and power (Acts 13 : 39 ; Gal. 3 : 21 ; Heb. 7:18, 19). In that it was weak through the flesh. The fault was not in the law, which was holy, right- eous, and good (7: 12), but in man's sinful nature (T : 7-13). God sending his own Son — recognizing the pre- existence of Christ. In the Jikeness of sinful flesh — not in our flesh of sin, but in its likeness, liable to all its needs and infirmities, and tempted in all points as we are, though in him was no sin (Heb. 4: 15; 1 Peter 2 : 22 ; Phil. 2 : 7), And for sin, or, on aecount of sin — a general but emphatic idea. It was on account of sin that God sent liis Son in order that he might expiate it and de- stroy it. He was manifested to take away sins, and destroy the works of the devil (iJohn3:5, 8). Condemned sin in the flesh — in the very nature which he had assumed : in our nature he suf- fered the penalty of sin (7:4; Heb. 2 : lO; 1 Peter 2 : 24) and kept tlic law perfectly (1 Peter 2 : 22 ; Heb. 7 : 26), exhibiting the righteousness of the law and its adapta- bility to men. Thus he condemned sin, decided against it, and did judgment upon it, exposing and condemning its malignity, breaking its power, and pro- curing its overthrow. Thus also he did what the law could not do — subduing sin in us by the indwelling Spirit and fulfilling the law in those that believe (next verse). 4. The object of all this. That the righteousness — the things ac- counted right — that is, the requirements, the righteous precepts of the law. (See on 1 : 17 (5); 2:26.) Might be ful- filled in us — that these requirements of the law might be met and performed in us who walk, etc. Not only is Christ's righteousness accounted to us in justification, but it results in a life of faith and obedience through the Spirit in our sanctification (Heb. s : 10-12). Who walk not — those ivalking not ac- cording to the flesh, but according to the Spirit — according to his dictates, fol- lowing him as a guide. The idea is not absolute perfection, for this is not at- tainable in our present state (1 John 1 : 8), but so far as they do walk. (Comp. 1 John 5 : 18.) " Whosoever is born of God sin- neth not," that is, so far as he is born of God, since nothing unholy can pro- ceed from God. So of the renewed man, so far as he is spiritually minded, his aims and services are in complete obedience to the di^nne law. This ac- cords also with the conflict described in 7 : 7-25. It is because the Christian is 104 ROMANS [Ch. VIII. 5 For ' they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh ; but they that are after the Spirit » the things of G the Spirit. For " to be carnally minded is deutli ; but to be spiritually minded 7 is life and peace. Because " the carnal mind is enmity against God : for it is not suliject to the law of God, * neither in- 8 deed can be. So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God. 9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that J the Spirit of 5 to the Spirit. For they that are ac- cording to the flesh mind the things of the flesli ; but they that are according to the Spirit, the tilings of the Spirit. 6 For the mind of the flesh is death ; but tlie mind of the Spirit is life and 7 peace. Because the mind of the flesh is enmity against God ; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, 8 neither indeed can it ; and they that are in the flesh can not please God. 9 But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God s John 3 : 6 ; 1 Cor. 2 : U. t Gal. 5 : 22, 25. u Ver. 13 ; 6 : 21, 23 ; Eph. 5 : 3-5. V 1 : 28-30 ; James 4 : 4 ; 1 John 2 : 15, 16. x 1 Cor. 2 : 14. y 1 Cor. 3 : 16. walking according to the Spirit that the conflict occurs. If he did not thus walk there would be no conflict, but the law of sin in his members would have full control. 5. Development and confirmation of the preceding clause. For they that are after the flesh — presenting the state of those " who walk after the flesh." Do mind the things of the flesh — are carnally minded. Earthly things are the objects of their choice, and with them they are fully occupied and engrossed. They that are after the Spirit — in a state of regeneration, who have the presence of the Holy Spirit, and are under his influence. Paul knows of but two classes among men. The things of the Spirit — are spiritually minded, guided by the Spirit, and loving spiritual things (Coi. 3:2; Phil. .T : 19, 20: Rom. 12 : Ifi). 6, For — explanatory, introducing a radical difference between ])eing car- nally minded and spiritually minded, and thereby making it evident that only the latter is not sul)ject to con- demnation. To be carnally minded — or, I'/ir mind of the Jiesh, the thought and purposes of the soul devoted to earthly things, and under their control. The words are descriptive of the unre- newed state of man, estranged from God. Such a state is death, aliena- tion from God, and leading on to eternal death. Death never means annihila- tion in Scripture. To be spiritnally minded — or. The mind of the Spirit — the thoughts, purposes, and afl'ections imbued with the Spirit, and under his control. Descriptive of the renewed state. Such a state is life, in the en- joyment of God's favor, in fellowship witli him, and leading on in eternal life. Connected also with religious peace, which is an evidence of a justi- fied state (5:1). 7. Because — introduces the rea- son of the preceding assertion. The carnal mind, or the mind of the flesh — the natural unrenewed state, the same as in the preceding verse. Is enmity against God — is opposed to the Divine will, and in its very nature is at war with the Divine nature, which is holiness and love. Sin and holiness, hatred and love, are diametrically op- posed. For it is not subject — or better, for it does not subject itself to the law of God; it persists in disobedience and rebellion. Neither indeed can be — better. Neither indeed can it sub- mit itself. It is incapable of so doing, for that would involve a change of its own nature, and it cannot cliange itself. In its own nature it is the very opposite of that required by the law. 8. The result stated as a matter of fact in the experience of individuals. So then they — rather. And they that are in the flesh cannot please God. Closely connected with the pre- ceding verse. Walking after the flesh and pleasing God cannot exist at the same time in the same person. Thus we are brought to the inference that only those in Christ can please God, and therefore are under no condemna- tion, which is the general sentiment of the whole passage. 9. But ye, the disciples of Christ, are not in the flej^h — in an unre- newed state, as just described (ver. 8), but in the Spirit, in that renewed state in which the Holy Spirit is the ruling influence. Such "walk after the Spirit" (vtr. 4). If so be — pro- vided that. Paul's hinguage is assuring Ch. VIII.] ROMANS 105 God dwell in you. Now if any man have not ^ the Spirit of Christ, he is none 10 of his. And if Christ he »in j'ou, the body is dead because of sin ; ^ but the spirit is life ^ because of righteousness. 11 But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in j'ou, ^ he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that 'dwelleth in you. 12 « Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh. 13 For fif ye live after the flesh, ye shall die : but if ye through the Spirit do dwells in you. And if any one has not the Spirit of Christ, he is none of 10 his. And if Christ is in you, the body is dead because of sin ; but the Spirit 11 is life because of righteousness. And if the Spirit of him who raised Jesus from the dead dwells in you, he who raised Christ from the dead will make alive your mortal bodies also, because of his' Spirit that dwells in you. 12 So then, brethren, we are debtors, not to the flesh, to live according to the 13 flesh. For if ye are living according to the flesh, ye are going to die ; but if z Gal. 4:6; Phil. 1 : 19. a 2 Cor. 13 : 5 ; Eph. 3 : 17 ; Col. 1 : 27. 6 John 11 : 25, 26. c Phil. 3 : 9. d 6 : 4, 5 ; John 14 : 19 ; 1 Cor. 6 : 14. e 6 : 2-15 ; 1 Cor. 6 : 19, 20^; 1 Peter 4:2,3. / Ver. 6 ; Gal. 6 : 8. and consoling, yet suggestive of such doubt and inquiry as to lead to self- examination (1 Cor. 13 : 5; Heb. 6:9), The Spirit of God — the Holy Spirit, dwell in you — denoting his habitual presence and influence (icor. 3:i6j. Now if any man have not — is des- titute of the Spirit of Christ, the Holy Spirit, of his indwelling presence and influence, he is none of his — he has no connection with Christ and no part in these consoling views. " The Spirit of God" and "the Spirit of Christ" are the same (Gai. 4:6; i Peter 1 : 11). Christ possessed the Spirit with- out measure (John 3 : 34 ; Acts 10 : 38) ; aiid he imparts it to his people (John 15 : 26; 16 : 7 ; Luke 24 : 49 ; Eph. 3 : 16). 10, And if Christ is in you, as a matter of fact, through the Spirit, as just stated in the preceding verse. The body is indeed dead, mortal, subject to death, because of sin. The be- liever is still in a measure subject to sin (v : 17-25), and therefore to its pen- alty so far as the body is concerned. But the Spirit — permeating the hu- man spirit, or the human spirit per- meated by the Holy Spirit. The prin- ciple thus divinely planted has no con- nection with sin, and hence has no taint of death, but has life, not only in promise but in reality, " living unto God." Because of righteous- ness — the implanted righteousness of sanctification which carries life along with it ( 6 : 22, 23) . Justification through the righteousness of Christ however is implied. 11. A further result of the indwell- ing Spirit of Christ. The effect on the soul in the last verse ; on the body in this. But if, as a matter of ilict, the Spirit of him, God the Father (6:4; Heb. 13:20), that raiscd up Jesus, personally, from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ, the Head of his people and as a first-fruits of them that have fallen asleep (i Cor. 15:20), shall also quicken, or make alive, your mortal bodies, subject to death, through — rather, because of, the Spirit that dwelleth in you; gives the reason, the indwelling Spirit. The body having become the temple of the Holy Spirit is precious in the sight of God (1 Cor. 6 : 19). The natural refer- ence here is to the resurrection of the body (2 Cor. 4:14). The same verb, quicken, is used with the same reference in 1 Cor. 15 : 22. It is broader than raised up, and thus may include the change eflected in those that remain at our Lord's coming (i Cor. is :5i). Thus the death of the body is but for a sea- son. 12. From the preceding views the apostle draws practical admonitions and encouragements. Therefore, brethren, we are debtors, we are under obligation, not to the flesh, to which we owe nothing, and from which we have sufiered much. But rather to the Spirit to live after the Spirit. AVe are under no obligation to the laAv of the flesh ; another law, that of the Spirit, is now the ruling principle, which demands absolute obedience. 13. Enforces the foregoing state- ment, non-compliance results in death. For if ye are living according to the flesh ye are going to die. The result is impending and sure (James i : i5). But if ye through the Spirit, who pro- duces in you spiritual aifections and ex- ercises of the mind, do mortify the 106 ROMANS [Ch. VIII. g mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live. 14 For »> as many as are led by the Spirit of God, 'they" are the sons of God. 15 For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again ''to fear; but ye have received the ' Spirit of adoption, 16 whereby we cry, ™ Abba, Father. ° The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God : 17 and if children, then <> heirs ; p heirs of by the Spirit ye put to death the deeds 14 of the body, yew-ill live. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, these 15 are sons of God. For ye did not re- ceive a spirit of bondage again unto fear ; but ye received a spirit of adop- tion, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. 10 The Spirit himself testifies with our spirit, that we are children of God ; 17 and if children, also heirs : heirs of g 1 Cor. 9 : 27 ; Gal. 5 : 24 ; Col. 3 : 5-8. ft Ver. 5, 9 ; Gal. 5 : 18. i 1 John 3:1,2. . k 2 Tim. 1:7:1 John 4 : 18. I Gal. 4 : 5-7. m Mark 14 : 36. n 2 Cor. 1 : 22 ; 5:5. o Acts 26 : 18 ; 1 Peter 1:4. p Gal. i : 7. deeds of the body, do hahitnaUy pat to death the jyractices of the hodt/, ye shall live. The end already be- gun is certain of completion. The struggle taught in chap. 7 is going on toward ultimate victory (12 : 2 ; Coi. 3 : 5-10 ; Gal. 5 : 16). 14. Confirms the assertion just made, "Ye shall live," by the fact that they are sons of God. For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, as intimated in the preceding verse ( Gai. 5:18,22-24), they are the sons of God ; they partake of his nature and shall live. Neither God nor his sons can die. Concerning sons of God, see 2 Cor. 6 : 16-18 ; Gal. 3 : 26 ; Matt. 5 : 9, 45 ; Phil. 2 : 15 ; 1 John 3:1-3. This sonship is proved and explained in the two following verses. 15. For, to show that ye are the sons'of Gods, ye have not received — rather, ye did not receive, when ye be- came Christians, the spirit of bond- age — of servitude, slavery — tending again unto fear. Such was not the spirit and temper of your minds w-hich ye received in connection with the Holy Spirit. But ye have received a spirit of adoption, or sonshij) — that spirit and temper of mind connected with sonship, Avhereby we cry, Abba, Father. The word adoption or sonsfiip is the same as that in Gal. 4:5; Eph. 1 : 5. It is used only by Paul in the New Testament, who never applies it to sonship by birth, but al- ways to adopted sonship. The figure is l)orrowed not from Jewish, but from Roman law, which recognized a fully adopted sonship. There is a clear dis- tinction made in the New Testament l)etween "the sons," or " the children of God," in a religious and spiritual sense, and "the ofispring" of God (Aots 17 : 28) in the natural. One is not evolved from the other. One is by na- ture; the other by grace and through the Spirit. (See Bib. Sac, July, 1895, pp. 439^57.) Becoming the sons of God through the Spirit of God, they have the spirit of children, so that with afiection, reverence, and confidence they call him Abba, the Aramaic word for Father, which was one ex- pressing a high degree of love and con- fidence, and used from early childhood. It was tlie word employed by our Lord in Gethsemane (Mark 14 : 36), and seems to have passed into general use among Christians. As applied to God it was equivalent to " Heavenly Father." "The knowledge of the Father as our Father, because the Father of the Son, is among the greatest of the treasures of grace" (II. C. G. Moule). Thus the first proof given of vsonship is from Christian consciousness (1 John 3 : 19-24). 16. A second proof of our sonship from the testimony of the Holy Spirit witnessing with ours. Both proofs are connected with Christian experience. The Spirit himself beareth wit- ness, or testifies, with our Spirit, which also witnesseth in our own con- sciousness, that Ave are the chil- dren, a more tender word than sons, of God. Paul recognizes the Ht>ly Spirit and our spirit as distinct. The testimony of our spirit is verified by that of the Holy Spirit. We are con- scious that we love the Father, and that we have fellowship with the Son, and we are also conscious of the love of God shed abroad by the Spirit in our hearts (5 : 5: 1 Johnl :3; 3 : U; 4: IS; 5:7). 17. Hence being God's children they are sure of the glory to come. Ii children, as you are in fact (John 1 : 12), Ch. VIII.] ROMANS 107 God, and joint heirs with Clirist; ■ the sufferings of this present time are not wortiiy to be compared with the glory which shall 19 be revealed in us. For the earnest ex- pectation of the creature ^ waiteth for God, and joint heirs with Christ; if indeed we suffer with him, that we may also be glorified with him. 18 For I reckon that the sufferings of this present time are of no account, in com- parison with the glory which is going 19 to be revealed for us. For the earnest longing of the creation is waiting for q Phil. 1 : 29 ; 2 Tim. 2 : 10-12 ; Rev. 3 : 21. r Acts 20 : 24 ; 2 Cor. 4 : 17, 18 ; 1 Peter 1 : 6, 7 ; 4 : 13. s 1 Cor. 1:7; Gal. 5 : 5. then, as a matter of course, heirs, a figure borrowed from the human re- lation ; heirs of God to a glorious inheritance by virtue of adoption and birth into the family of God ( Gai. 4:4-7: Matt. 25 : 34; Acts 20 : 32 ; 1 Peter 1:4); joillt heirs, felloiv-heirs, with Christ, who by union with him becomes our divine and human Elder Brother (ver. 29) and we participants in his glory (Johu 17 : 22,24). If so be that, if indeed, sug- gesting self-examination (ver. 9), Ave suffer with him — suffer as he suliered in inward and outward conflict with sin, Satan, and the world (Heb. 12 : 3), and suffering for his sake and the gospel. If we are one with him in di^^ne rela- tionship we must be sharers in his suf- ferings, in order that we may he also glorified ir?7/i him. The one is a nec- essary antecedent, the needful prepara- tion; the other the necessary conse- quent, the obvious result (1 Peter 1 : 5-7). An inheritance of suiFering here and of glory hereafter ( Mark 10 : 29, 30 : Rom. 4 : 13, 14 ; Rev. 3 : 21 ; 22 : 5 ) . The State of Culopt 10 n in- volves three things : (1) Freedom from the law as a ground of justification ; (2) enjoyment of the spirit of son ship ; (3) heirship, a right to a future inheri- tance. Of this they have foretastes here, in the spiritual freedom, in spir- itual-mindedness, and in spiritual vic- tories. 18-39. Grounds of encoueage- ment in the midst of suffering. Future glory far outweighs all present suffering (ver. 18-25); the Holy Spirit helps us (ver. 26, 27) ; all tilings work for good to them that love God according to his purpose (ver. 28-30) ; the final issue is assured. God is for us and nothing can break the bond between us and him (ver. 31-39). 18. The first ground of encourage- ment. The reference to suffering and glory, in the last verse, suggests the train of thousht that follows. For — to confirm what has been said and to encourage in the midst of sufferings. I reckon that the sufferings of this present time, and Paul well knew by experience what these suffer- ings meant (2 Cor. 7:5; 11 ; 23-28), are not worthy to be compared, are insig- nificant and of no account in compari- son with the glory which shall be revealed in us, literally, into us. It is not a glory that merely passes before us, or is exercised toward us, but which enters in and is wrought within us, of which we are the recipients and the subjects ( 2 Cor. 3 : 18 ; Col. 3 : 4 ; 1 John 3:2). It is evident also from the next verse that we are to be the subjects of this glory. The present time has the idea of brevity — this brief, passing, limited time. Dr. A. Carson has an eloquent sermon on this verse. See " Fish's Mas- terpieces," Vol. I., p. 594 ff". 19. The meaning of this and the four verses that follow has been discussed for ages. The chief difficulty is in the word translated creature and creation ( ver. 22 ) . Derived from a verb meaning to create, the word denotes primarily the act of creating. In the New Testament it is used in this sense only in Rom. 1 : 20. Its secondary and common meaning is the thing created, the citation. In or- dinary use it has about the same lati- tude as the word creation, and thus may be mentally limited by the nature of the action ascribed to it or exerted on it. For example, in Mark 16 : 15, " Preach the gospel to every creature," or the lohole creation, the word is evi- dently limited to rational or human be- ings on earth, no others being the ob- jects of such action. So also it is lim- ited to any created thing in ver. 39 and 1 : 25 ; also Heb. 4 : 13. In Gal. 6 : 15 ; 2 Cor. 5 : 17, neiv creation or creature is evidently limited by the connection and the adjective neiv to the regenerate man in Christ Jesus. In Mark 10 : 6 ; 13 : 108 ROMANS [Ch. VIII. the 'manifestation of the sons of God. 20 For "the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in 21 hope ; because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the revelation of the sons of God. 20 For the creation was made subject to vanity, not by its own will, but be- cause of him who made it subject, in 21 hope that the creation itself also will be set free from the bondage of corrup- tion into the freedom of the glory of (Mai. 3 : 17, 18; 1 John 3 : 2. u Gen. 3 : 19. 19 ; 2 Peter 3:4; Rev. 3 : 14, the ref- erence is plainly to the sum or aggre- gate of created things (comp. Heb. 9 : ii) not of this building" or creation, not this kind of created things, not of this material creation. In the general sense of creation it appears to be used in this passage. But is the word at all re- stricted in meaning by its connection with the words and thoughts of the passage ? And if so, to what extent ? I answer, the word creation cannot here include Christians, the converted; for they, "the sons of God" are here dis- tinguished from the creation ( so also in ver. 22,23), the creation is waiting for their manifestation. Neither does it appear to include mankind ; for man was not subjected unwillingly to vanity (Gen. 3 : 1-7) ; and mankind outside of believers cannot be said to be looking with earnest longing for the resurrection and its con- sequent glories, which are included in " the manifestation of the sous of God " ; neither can it be said of humanity as a whole that it shall participate in this glorious deliverance. The word creation therefore seems to he limited here to the inanimate and irrational creation and quite equivalent to our word nature. As irrational animals were involved in the curse we need not suppose them to be excluded here. ( Comp. isa.ii:i-9.) Only so far, however, as the general resurrection and the reno- vation of our earth may exclude them (2Pctor3 : 10-16; 1 Cor. 15; 1 Thcss. 4 : 13-18). By a bold and animated personification, as in Old Testament prophecies, Paul in- troduces universal nature as waiting and longing for the full deliverance and glorv of the sons of God. See Dr. A. C. Kendrick, "Moral Conflict of Hu- manity," American Baptist Publica- tion Society, 1804; Dr. Arnold "Bap- tist Quarterly," 18G7, p. 143 fl. For introduces the proof of the greatness and certainty of the future glorifica- tion which he had just contrasted with the brief and insignificant suficrings here (ver. is). For creatioyi or nature with earnest and persistent expectation tcaits for the manifestation, or revelation, of the sons of God — patiently waiting and longing for those glorious events, that renovation which shall attend and attest the re- vealing of the sons of God (ver. is, 19 j^ when it shall be freed from the curse of the fall (Gen. 3: 17,18). Eamcst expec- tation — a peculiar word with an em- phatic meaning. Nature is represented as stretching forth her neck in strained at- tention, as it were, to some distant por- tion of the heavens from which deliv- erance was to come. In regard to this manifestation see 1 John 3:2; and of the renovation, see 2 Peter 3 : 12, 13 ; Bev. 21 : 1, fF. 20, 21. The reason of this longing. For the creature, nature or creation, was made subject to vanity, im- perfection and frailty, not willingly, not of its own choice, but of the vill of him who made it subject, that is, of God, w^ho subjected it for the wisest ends and his own glory. Through man's sin the earth was cursed for his sake ( Gen. s : n), and unable to realize the ends for which it was created. In regard to vanity com- pare Ps. 39 : 5, 6. In hope. This should be separated from the preceding by a comma, and joined to ver. 21, In hope that even nature ■?7se//, emphatically in- dicating a descent from a higher and nobler to a lower order of beings. Shall be delivered, ?<'77Z be set free, from the bondage, tlie servitude, oi corruption, connected with and re- sulting from the vanity to which it was subjected. So far as nature is concerned the corruption is a physical imperfec- tion and detriment; some change for the worse came upon man's abode wlien he fell (Gen. 3 : 17-19), and nature sufiered and still suffers from the consequences of the fiill and of sin. Into the glo- rious liberty — pregnant with mean- ing: and brought into the freedom of the glory of the children of God. Ch. VIII.] ROMANS 109 22 the children of God. For we know 22 the children of God. For we know- that the whole creation groaneth and travaileth in pain together until now : 23 and not only they, but ourselves also, which have ^the firstfruits of the Spirit, y even we ourselves groan with- in ourselves, waiting for the adoption, to wit, the * redemption of our body. 24 For we are saved " by hope : but hope tliat the wliole creation groans and travails in pain together until now. 23 And not only so, but ourselves also, though we have the tirst-fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, Availing for the adoption, the redemption of our body. 24 For by hope we were saved ; but hope X 2 Cor. 5 : 5. y 2 Cor. 5 : 2-4. z Luke 21 : 28 ; Eph. 4 : 30. a Heb. 6 : 18, 19. Creation or nature shall share in the freedom connected with and involved in the glory of the saints, but in a way adapted to its character, that is being physically restored to its primeval beauty and excellence. ( comp. isa. 65 : n- 25 ; Ezek. 34 : 25-27 ; Matt. 19 : 28 ; Acts 3 : 21 ; 2 Peter 3 : 13.) We may believe that in the be- ginning God adapted every other being and event of our world to man's char- acter and condition, as foreknown, thus making man a central figure in our world and producing harmony in all his works. See Hitchcock's "Religion and Geology," pp. 104-111. 22. And this is a truthful representa- tion, For we know, from universal experience, that the whole crea- tion, or all nature, groaneth to- gether in all its parts and travaileth in pain together, as it were, in childbirth, until now, from the be- ginning up to this time. A vivid and strong personification of the suffering and distress connected with the curse from man's sin. (Compare similar pic- torial language in the Old Testament.) "For this shall the earth mourn" (Jer.4:28); ** Howl, ye ships of Tar- shish" (Isa. 23:1); "The land mourn- eth and languisheth, Lebanon is ashamed and withereth away " (isa. 33 : 9) ; "The voice of thy brother's blood crieth unto me from the ground " (Gen. 4: 10); " How doth the city sit solitary that was full of people ! . . . She weepeth sore in the night, and her tears are on her cheek "( Lamen. 1 : 1, 2). The pangs here, however, are not of despair and death but of hope and life. 23. And not only they, rather. And not only so, does the whole crea- tion groan together, etc., but our- selves also, who are believers, though we have the firstfruits of the Spirit which we have received, an earnest and pledge of heavenly bliss (2Cor.i:22)^ cvcu we oursclves (re- peated for emphasis) groan within ourselves (7:14-24; ICor. 9:27. Comp.Jusus groaning, John 11 : 33, 38), waiting patiently and with expectation for the adop- tion, or sonsMp, the Spirit of which we have received (ver. is)^ but the full con- summation and recognition of which do not yet appear (iJohn3:2), the re- demption, or ransoming, of our body from the curse and bondage of sin, and a transformation into a glorious body like that of the risen Christ (Phii. 3 : 21 ; 2 Cor. 5:2), As Paul is Speaking of bod- ily sufferings largely, so he directs at- tention to the redemption of the body. Without the glorified body redemption would not be complete, and in that body it becomes complete. And so a glorified body is necessary to the full realization of sonship. On first fruits see Deiit. 26 : 1-11 ; 1 Cor. 1.5 : 20. First- fruits were the fir.st handful from the fields, which was a foretoken and a pledge of the whole. So the reception of the Spirit by believers is a token and a pledge of its fuller and more perfect enjoyment hereafter ( Eph. i : i3, u). Thus ver. 22, 23 illustrate and expand tlie thought of ver. 20, 21, especially the hojie that creation shall be delivered and this hope extended to the children of God. The glory for the future de- liverance is advanced, not only by the prophetic birth-pangs of the whole crea- tion, but also by the agonizing longings of those who have received the first- fruits and foretastes of the Spirit. 24. The apostle has presented hope connected with suffering nature and with sighing and agonizing believers. Hence he continues : For, introducing the reason of this expectancy, we are, rather, were, saved, at the time of exercising faith in conversion, by, or in, hope. By means of hope as an extended faith, or, in the hope which we exercised in view of the final and 110 ROMANS [Ch. Vlll. that is seen is not hope : for what a man seeth, wliy doth he yet hope for? 25 But if we hope for tliat we see not, then do we with patience wait for it. 26 Likewise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities : for *> we know not wliat we should pray for as we ought : but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be 27 uttered. And '^he that searcheth tlie hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketli inter- cession for the saints according to the mill of God. seen is not hope : for what one sees, 25 wliy does he also lujpe for ? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait 26 for it witli patience. And in like man- ner the Spirit also helps our weak- ness ; for we know not what to pray for as we ought ; but the Spirit himself makes intercession for us witn groan- 27 ings which cannot be uttered. And he who searches the hearts knows what is the mind of the Spirit, be- cause he makes intercession for the saints according to the will of God. b Matt. 20 : 22 ; James i : 3. c See refs. 1 Chron. 28 : 9 ; Acts 1 : 24 ; 1 Thess. 2 : 4. glorious salvation ( l Peter l : 5 ; Titus 1:2; Rom. 12 : 12) , Botli of thcsB idcas are sug- gested. Our salvation was not an im- mediate, but a prospective one. Paul distinguishes between hope and faith (1 Cor. 13 : 13), and everywhere empha- sizes salvation by faith. " Inasmuch as the object of salvation is both rela- tively present and also relatively future, hope is produced from faith and iiidis- solul)ly linked with it ; for faith appre- hends the object, in so far as it is present ; hope, in so far as it is still fu- ture" (Philtppi), But hope that is seen — realized in having its object present and thus seen, is not hope, it ceases to be hope, it is sight ; for it is evident that a man cannot hope for that which he sees and enjoys. 25. The thought of the preceding verse is applied to the subject in hand : patient waiting for our full salvation. But if we o?'e hoping for what we do not see, then do we with patience, with constancy, and through j)(ttience, in steadfastness AA^ait for it and ex- peiiing it, the adoption and the re- demption of our body being included in our full salvation (ver. 23). 26. In this and the next verse Paul presents a second ground of encourage- ment in the midst of sufferings : the Holy Spirit helps us. Likewise — iyi like manner. As in our earnest long- ing for deliverance hope helped us with patience and in expectancy of future glory, so in like manner the Holy Spirit helps our infirmities, rather, our infirmity or weakness (2 Cor. i-J : 10) ; he shares a part irifh us, help- ing us to bear, in our infirmity, our load of suffering ; and this he does in guiding and assisting us in prayer with groanings unutterable. The reference is manifestly to the Holy Spirit, as else- where in this chapter. For, to show how the Spirit helps us, we know not what Ave should pray for as Ave ought — our inability to know ?/'/« that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor «prin- 35 for us. Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or 36 nakedness, or peril, or sword ? As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long ; We were accounted as sheep for slaughter. 37 Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who 38 loved us. For I am persuaded, that neither death nor life, nor angels nor X John 10 : 28. y Luke 21 : 12-19. a 1 Cor. 15 : 54-57 ; 2 Cor. 2 : 14 ; 12 : 9, 10. 6 14 z 1 Cor. 4:9; 15 : 30, 31 ; 2 Cor. 4 : 11. . c Eph. 6 : 11, 12 ; Col. 2 : 15 ; 1 Peter 3 : 22. which the Greek allows with the same essential meaning, and in ver. 33 and 34 punctuate thus : Who shall lay any- thing to the charge of God's elect? Shall God, he who justifieth? Who is he that condemneth ? Is it Christ, he who died, yea rather, was raised, who is also at the right hand of God, who also intercedes for us ? " The questions imply their own answers. The major- ity of critics, however, punctuate as in the English version. 35. Finally, in view of God's love in Christ, exhibited in what Christ has done and is doing for us, Paul reaches the climax, and triumphantly asks. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? — that is, Christ's love for us, not ours for him (2 Cor. 5 : u ; Eph. 3:19). Compare on "the love of God " (5:5). Our love, however, grows out of Christ's love, and is inseparably connected with God's love in Christ, shed abroad in our hearts (5:5). Us is somewhat emphatic — us, for whom Christ died and intercedes. Shall tribulation, or distress, or per- secution, etc. — any, or all of these things, which he and other Christians were suffering from their adversaries, the world, the flesh, and the devil ? (2 cor. 11 : 23-27 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 10-12.) TheSC at times might arouse fear, or cause despond- ency, or, joining hands with weak faith, tempt them to think that God was forsaking them, but they could not separate tliem from the strong hold of Christ's love (John 10 : 28, 29). 36. As it is written (ps. 44:22)^ quoted from the Septuagint version, and suggested by the last word sword, in the preceding verse. For thy sake we are killed all the day long— at all times of the day we are liable to be put to death, and at all hours it occurs to one or another ; we are account- ed as sheep for the slaughter, rather, for slaughter, destined for it and regarded as suitable for it by their ad- versaries. Paul quotes this as true of saints of all ages, applicable to those of his day as well as to those of Old Testa- ment times. (Comp. Heb. 11 : 35-38.) We suffer as they suffered, and their sufier- ings were a foreshadowing of ours. 37. But or Nay, so far from being overcome and separated from Christ's love, in all these things, sufferings, persecutions, and deaths, enumerated in ver. 35, 36, we are more than conquerors, we gain triumphant and surpassing victories, through him that loved us, through Christ (ver. 35, 39)^ who is thus stylcd in Rev. 1:5. (Comp. Gal. 2: 20.) In thcsc Very things in which we may appear to be vanquished we come forth with a stronger faith and a more ardent love here, and a larger capacity for enjoying the eternal weight of glory hereafter (2 Cor. 4 : 16-18). 38. Paul confirms what he had said, of being more than victorious, by an enthusiastic expression of his assured convictions: For I am persuaded, having full assurance (comp. same word in 14:14; 15:14), that neither death nor life — two states or conditions which must confront every individual, the one, the last enemy, with its terrors, the other with its charms or sufferings, but both must yield to the power of Christ (14 : 8, 9 ; Phil. 1 : 21-23 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 26), Nor angels, nor principalities — superhuman beings and dominions in general, including both good and bad (Eph. 3 : 10 ; Col. 1 : 16). In Eph. 6 : 12 Paul refers to the conflict against principali- H 114 ROMANS [Ch. VIII. cipalities, nor powers, nor things pres- 39 ent, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, d shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. principalities, nor things present nor 39 things to come, nor powers, nor height nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. d John 10 : 28-30. ties, etc., and in Eph. 1 : 21 to Christ as above all these, and in Col. 2 : 15 as despoiling and triumphing over them. Nor powers. If this word is placed here, it naturally refers to superhuman powers in the same sphere as angels. But the best critical authorities place it at the end of the verse after " things to come," where it must be used of powers in the widest sense, forces of every description. Nor things pres- ent, nor things to come — events of all time, present and future. None of these shall separate us. Christ is the first and the last, who is and is to come (Rev. 1 : 8, 17, 18) and will Bvcr be present to deliver. 39. Nor height, nor depth— no extent of space will be great enough to separate us. No matter how high Christ may be above us, nor how low we may be beneath him, he still embraces us in his love. (Comp.Ps. 139 : 7-10 ; Eph. 4:8-10.) Nor any Other creature, or created thing, including all else that has been created, shall in any future time be able to separate us, all or any of us who are truly his, from the love of God, of the Almighty and Unchangeable One, which is in and through Christ Jesus our Lord (Eph. 1 :6: Heb. 13 :8). NoticC that tMs " love of God in Christ " is styled "the love of Christ," in ver. 35, the love of God to us in Christ, indicating the divinity of Christ and the union of the Father and the Son in their love for us (John 3 : 16; Gal. 2 : 20). " What a Com- mentary is this whole passage on ver. 28 " (Meyer). " What did Cicero ever say more eloquent?" (Erasmus.) Practical Remarks. 1. The sinner finds only condemnation out of Christ ; but in Christ, united with him by faith and in fellowship with him through the Spirit, he finds pardon, peace, and safety (ver. 1, 34 ; 5:1; John 3 : 17). 2. The Holy Spirit is life-giving and through Christ gives true freedom from the controlling influences of sin and death (ver. 2 : Gal. 3:3; 4 : 6, 7). 3. The atonement is the product of Di- vine love, and its necessity is seen in the evils of sin, and in the demands of God's justice and holiness (ver. 3; John 3 : 16; Heb. 9 : 22, 23). 4. The Christian life is opposed to a life of self-gratification, and is characterized by devotedness to God and by loving obe- dience to him (ver. 4 ; Gal. 5 : 22-26). .5. The bent of one's thoughts, affections, and pursuits is a true index and decisive test of character (ver. 5 ; Matt 7 : 16-20). 6. Sin and misery, holiness and happi- ness, are necessarily and inseparably con- nected (ver. 6 ; Matt. 6 : 22-24). 7. Submission of the soul to God is an evidence of regeneration (ver. 7 ; James 4 : 4-7). 8. A change of heart is necessary to pleasing God (ver. 8 ; John 3 : 3). 9. One may know that he is a Christian by the indwelling of the Spirit (ver. 9; 1 Cor. 6 : 18-20). 10. How carefully should we keep our bodies from defilement, since they are temples of the Holy Spirit (ver. 9, 10; 1 Cor. 3 : 16, 17). 11. Though the body is still mortal and suffering from the effects of sin, yet the redemptive work of Christ extends to the bodies as well as to the souls of believers (ver. 10, 11, 23; John 11 : 23-26; Phil. 3:21). 12. By his indwelling Spirit, God deliv- ers believers from the controlling power of the old nature, and obligates them to live for him (ver. 12 ; 12 : 1, 2). 13. We must either put our sins to death, or they will put us to death eternally. We cannot be saved in our sins (ver. 13 ; Luke 16: 13; Gal. 6 : 8). 14. A sure sign of divine sonship, "led by the Spirit of God " (ver. 14 ; 2 Cor. 6 : 16, 17; Matt. 5:9). Irt. A spirit of fear and servitude is un- Ch. VIII.] ROMANS 115 Christian. A filial spirit is the true spirit of religion, and is begotten only by the Holy Spirit (ver. 15 ; Gal. 4 : 6 ; John 1 : 12). 16. The Christian has the evidence of his sonship, in his own experience, by the testimony of the Spirit (ver. 16 ; Gal. 4 :6). 17. Christ, a son and heir by nature ; believers, by adoption. To what an inheri- tance ! Finite suffering ! Infinite glory ! (ver. 17; 1 Peter 1:4). 18. The sufferings and trials of Chris- tians are as nothing in both duration and degree to the future glory of their son- ship (ver. 18 ; Col. 1 : 27 ; 2 Cor. 4 : 17). 19. Man stands at the head of creation. His fall was creation's curse : his restora- tion to the glory of sonship, creation's blessing (ver. 19 ; Gen. 3 : 17 ; Rev. 22 : 3). 20. God had a benevolent design in sub- jecting creation to suffering, decay, and death (ver. 20, 21; Acts 2 : 26). See Hitchcock's "Religion of Geology," p. 85, ff. 21. Creation is to be freed from its present state of degradation, and made partaker, according to its nature, of the glories connected with God's children (ver. 21 ; Acts 3 : 21 ; Matt. 19 : 28). 22. How infinitely great the future glory of believers if the whole creation from the beginning groans and longs for its manifestation (ver. 22; Rev. 12 : 6, 16). 23. The children of God will not find the full satisfaction of their earnest long- ings till they have attained the full glories of their sonship in the resurrection state (ver. 23 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 54-57). 24. Inasmuch as the Christian life is a growth, and sanctification progressive, hope holds an important place as a sup- port and solace (ver. 24 ; Heb. 6 : 18, 19). 25. Hope and patience go together and help the believer waiting for the full en- joyment of his sonship (ver. 25 ; 5 : 4, 5 ; Heb. 6 : 11, 12). 26. We should ever recognize the office of the Spirit as our Advocate, and seek and gratefully acknowledge his help (ver. 26 ; Luke 11 : 13 ; Eph. 4 : 30). 27. Whatever prayer the Spirit incites, is according to God's will, and will be an- swered. He therefore is the safest who yields himself up most entirely to the Spirit (ver. 27 ; 1 John 5 : 14). 1 28. The facts of the believers loving I God and God's purpose regarding them, should be a solace in trials, since all events are under his control for their good (ver. 28 : Heb. 12 : 11 ; Ps. 119 : 67, 71 ). 29. Foreknowledge and decrees may be regarded as co-existent in the Divine mind (1 Peter 1:2). A Christlike spirit and life are a sure evidence that we are the subjects of God's gracious purpose (ver. 29 ; Eph. 1 : 4 ; 1 Cor. 15 : 49). 30. Man's free agency and God's sover- eign pm-pose unite in human salvation (ver. 29, 30 ; John 6 : 44 : 5 : 40 ; Rev. 22 : 17). None will be saved but those who love God and follow after holiness (ver. 28, 29; Heb. 12:10, 14). 31. The perseverance of the saints is as- sured, since there is an inseparable con- nection between predestination and final glorification (ver. 30; Phil. 1:6). 32. With God for us we are in the major- ity and stronger than all the universe be- sides (ver. 31; Ps. 118 : 6). 33. God's infinite friendship and love for us have been tested and assured by his highest possible gift (ver. 32 ; 1 John 4 : 9, 10). 34. God's people are his chosen and jus- tified ones. It is absurd to suppose that he would ever desert them (ver. 33 ; Heb. 13 : 5, 6). 35. Christ came not to condemn, but to save. His death, resurrection, exaltation, and intercession, all assure the salvation of believers (ver. 34 ; Eph. 1 : 20-23 ; John 3 : 17). 36. Our love results from Christ's love (John 4 : 19), and as nothing can destroy his love toward us, so nothing will de- stroy our love toward him (ver. 35, 38, 39 ; Jer. 31 : 3). 37. Scripture, history, and experience, all testify that God's people must expect opposition and persecution from a wicked world (ver. 37 ; 2 Tim. 3 : 12). 38. How triumphant our victory through Christ! His enemies are already a con- quered foe. Tribulations become a means of blessing and glory (ver. 37 ; 1 Peter 4 : 13 ; James 1 : 2). 39. The present and eternal safety of) the Christian is as sure as the love of God, the merit, power, and love of Christ can make it (ver. 31-39; John 10 : 28, 29). 116 ROMANS [Ch. IX. Vindication of God's dealings with Jews and Gentiles. 9 <^ I SAY the truth in Christ, I lie not, fmy conscience also bearing me wit- 2 ness in the Holy Ghost, that I have great heaviness "and continual sorrow 3 in my heart. For k I could wish that 9 I SAY the truth in Christ, 1 lie not, my conscience also testifying with me 2 in the Holy Spirit, that" I have great grief and unceasing anguish in my 3 heart. For I could wish to be myself e Gal. 1 : 20 ; 1 Tim. 2 : 7. /John 13 : 19-21. g Exod. 32 : 32 ; 2 Sam. 18 : 33. 40. What an honor to be a Christian! Plow grateful should we be for the love of God in Christ Jesus ! What obligations it ])uts upon us ! Woe to us if we love not m return ! (ver. 31-39 ; 1 Cor. 16 : 22). , CHAPTER IX. Paul now proceeds to consider the problem arising from the fact that a greater part of the Jews rejected Chris- tianity. He had shown that salvation was only tlirough faitli in Clirist. He had answered the objection, common to all ages, that such a doctrine tended to immorality, and had shown that on the contrary it insured holiness and final salvation. But still it would be ob- jected from a Jewish standpoint that this doctrine involved unfaithfulness in God to the Jewish people. This was a living question peculiar to that age. Paul was constantly meeting it, and he had gone througli it in his own experi- ence, and under Divine guidance had wrought out an answer. This he pre- sents in the ninth, tenth, and eleventh chapters. In this chapter he vindicates the jus- tice of God in passing over the unl)e- lieving Jews and extending the gospel to the Gentiles. First of all he ex- pres.ses his deep sorrow for his own people and his earnest desire for their welfare (vor. i-s). But the promise of God had not failed, for mere natural descent from Abraham did not consti- tute a right to the promise ( vcr. 6-i3), l)ut the riglit depended entirely on the free favor and choice of God, with wlioin there is no unrigliteousness (vir. u-is). In tliis he exercised his unquestionable right and prerogative as the Creator in sucli a manner as to display his justice and his mercy (ver. m-21), wliieli wasal.so according to prophecy ( ver. 2.5-2!)), without interfering with the free exerci.se of faith or unbelief on tlie part of either Jew or Gentile (ver. 30-33), In this discussion I'aul accepts the absolute righteous- ness of God as unquestionable, and the Old Testament Scriptures as of su- preme authority. 1-5. Paul expresses his deep sorrow for his own people and his earnest desire for their wel- FARE, especially in view of their great privileges. As a Jew he would natur- ally do this for he had specially desired to preach the gospel to them (acis 9 : 28, 29: 22 : 19, 2o) ; as an apostlc to the Gen- tiles he would be equally desirous of assuring them, notwithstanding this, of his deep interest and love for them. As he was also about to speak of mat- ters especially distasteful to the Jews, such as God's passing over Israel and the calling of Gentiles, he was moved to use the strongest language in speak- ing of his deep concern for them. 1. What a contrast to the exultant strains at the end of the last chapter! But to Paul, in tliat high state of tri- umphant joy, the condition of unbe- lieving Israel would, in contrast, seem the more deplorable. As it burst afresh on his mind he could not but speak in language most intense. I say the truth in Christ, with a solemn sense of my union with Christ, as a believer in him, and in a manner becoming that relation. Though a Chri.stian he would assure them that he had lost none of his interest in his own people. I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness, or te.'^tij'i/i)ig in'f/i me -in the Holy Spirit, imbued and enlightened by the Holy Spirit. The consciousness of the Spirit's presence and power increased confidence in the testimony of conscience. Such strong language was needful in view of the doctrine of the chapter which follows, and because as an apo.stle to the CJen- tiles the Jews niignt think he liad quite forgotten them. 2. That I have great heaviness, or gnef, and continued sorrow, or unccasi^ig pain, in my heart, a liv- ing and abiding sorrow in my inmost Ch. IX.] ROMANS 117 myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kiusmen according to 4 the flesh : who are Israelites ; ^ to whom pertaineth the adoption, and ' the glory, and ^ the covenants, and i the giving of the law, and ^the service oj 5 God, and " the promises ; whose are the fathers ; and ^of whom as concern- ing the flesh Christ came, p who is over all, God q blessed for ever. Amen. accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh ; 4 who are Israelites ; whose is the adop- tion, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the ser- 5 vice, and the promises ; whose are the fathers, and of whom as to the flesh is the Christ, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen. h Exod. 4 : 22 ; Deut. 14 : 1. i Exod. 29 : 43 ; 1 Sam. 4 : 21, 22. k Gen. 15 : 18 ; Exod. 24 : 7, 8 ; Eph. 2 : 12 ; Heb. 8 : 8-10. I Exod. 20. m Heb. 9 : 1, 10. n Luke 1 : 54, 55, 69-75. o Luke 3 ; 23. p 10 : 12 ; Jer. 23 : 6 ; John 1 : 1-3. q 2 Cor. 11 : 31. being, in view of what has happened and will happen to my people. 3. For I could wish, even now if such a thing were possible and hence proper, but in the very nature of the case inadmissible ! that myself were accursed from Christ, an anathenia, devoted to ruin by a solemn curse /;'o//* Christ, for, in behalf of, my breth- ren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, if -such a thing could ac- complish their salvation. I could for their sakes be willing to be treated as Christ was — Ijearing, as an object ac- cursed, the sins of my people. Com- pare the same sentiment expressed by Moses (Exod. 32 : 32). It WOuld 1)6 UCCCS- sary for any one to enter into the ex- perience and the very Christlike heart of the apostle in order to appreciate the full meaning of his language. (Comp. 1 John 3 : 16. ) Anathema means, i)roperly, anything consecrated to God, a votive offering. But anji;hing thus devoted could not be redeemed, and if an ani- mal, must be slain (Lev. 27 : 28, 29) ; and therefore applied to a person or thing doomed to destruction (Josh. 6 : 17; 7 : 12), and hence in the New Testament a curse, devoted to ruin, to the direst woes. This is the meaning of the word wherever used by Paul ( 1 Cor. 12:3,- le : 22 : Gal. 1 : 3, 9 , see also Acts. 23 : U). Instead of / could Irish (above) some translate, 1 was ivishi)ig, describing an actual state of his mind at some former time. But this is less to be preferred. Most adopt the common rendering of our English text. See the same construc- tion in Gal. 4 : 20 and Acts 25 : 22 in the Greek, and their translation in the Revised version. 4. Who are Israelites— their most sacred, honorable, and distin- guished name (ii .• i; John i :47). See Gen. 32 : 28 when the name Israel was given to Jacob. Note the six preroga- tives which are now mentioned as pe* culiar to them as a people and greatly to their advantage. To whom, etc.; better, tvhose is the adoption or the son- s/i ip, that is as a nation taken into a near and peculiar relationship ( Exod. 4 : 22; Deut. 14 : 1 ; Hosea 11 : 1, 8), a grand priv- ilege, but not so great as the personal sonship of believers in Christ (8 lo). And the glory — doubtless referring to the symbol of God's presence as manifested in the cloud in the wilder- ness, over the tabernacle, and at times on the mercy seat of the ark (Exod. is : 21 ; 24 : 16; 40 : 34; Lev. 16 : 2). And the COVe- nants made with the patriarchs (Gen. 15 : 18 : 17 : 2, 4. 7-11 : 26 ; 24 ; 28 : 13-15. See also Exod. 24:7, 8: 31:16; 34:28; Ps. 89:28, 34). And the giving of the law on Mount Sinai (Exod. chap. 19-23). Compare how Moses and Nehemiah dwell upon the excellencies of the law (Deut. 4:8; Neh. 9:13, 14). And the service of God (omit of God, not being in the original), the religious' service, the en- tire system of ritual and ceremonial service ordained through Moses and performed in the tabernacle and the temple (Heb.9:i). And the promises — especially those relating to the Mes- .Siah ( John 4 : 22 ; Matt. 1 : l). 5. Whose are the fathers (n : 28), Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, the fathers of the nation (Exod. 3 :15; 4 : 5; Acts3 : 13; 7 : 32). And of whom as concern- ing the flesh, as to his human nature and descent, Christ came, the most important distinction of the Jewi.sh people. The language implies that Christ had also a higher nature. (Comp. 1:3,4.) Who is over all, Jew and Gentile, God blessed forever — re- ferring most naturally to Christ and affirming his supreme divinity. This accords with what is taught concerning 118 ROMANS [Ch. IX. 6 f Not as thoui?h the word of God hath taken none effect. For » they are not all Israel, -which are of Israel : 7 • neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children : but. In Isaac shall thy seed be called. 8 That is, " They which are the children of the tiesh, these are not the children of God : but the children of the prom- 9 ise »are counted for the seed. For this u the word of promise. At this time will I come, and Sarah shall have a son. 6 But not as though the word of God has failed. For not all they are Is- 7 rael, who are of Israel ; neither, be- cause they are Abraham's seed, are they all children ; but, in Isaac shall 8 thy seed be called. That is, not they who are the children of the flesh are children of God : but the children of 9 the promise are reckoned as seed. For ' the word of promise is this. At this sea- son I will come, and Sarah shall have a r3:3; 11:1,2. s 2 : 28, 29. t Luke 3 : 8 : Phil. 3 : 3. w Gal. 4 : 22-31. x Gal. 3 : 26-29. Chri.st in John 1 : 1, 18 ; 20 : 28. (Comp. Acts 20 : 28 ; Titus 2 : 13, aud John 12 : 41, with Isa. 6:5.) Some however put a period after flesh, and make this an independent sen- tence, a doxology, 3Iay God who is over ail be blessed, or praised forever. A strong objection to this is that who, coming immediately after Christ as to the flesh, naturally refers to Christ, and that a change of subject from Christ to God is improbable. Besides, the posi- tion of the word blessed in the original should be placed at the beginning of the sentence, as a doxology, but it is placed in the middle where it would naturally be in describing Christ. Others place a period after over all, re- ferring to the providential oversight of Christ, and make a sentence and dox- ology of the clause. Blessed be God forever. But in the original the word God comes first and without the article which is right in a descriptive sentence, but in a doxology God should have the article and blessed should come first. To regard either of the above as an in- dependent doxology, is abrupt, and so far unnatural. It was however most natural after referring to the human nature of Christ, as to the flesh, to speak of his divinity. Most scholars, both ancient and modern, adopt this view. That such language having so much of the character of the doxology should refer to Christ, accords with 2 Peter 3:18; Rev. 1 : G ; 5 : 13. ( Comp. 2 Tim. 4 : 18; 1 Peter 4: n.) AmCll. (See on 1:2.5.) 6-13. NOTWITHST.\NDING ISRAEL'S UNBELIEF, THE PROMISE OF GOD HAS NOT FAILED. 6. Paul's sad lament over Israel im- plied that the great mass of his people were foiling of .•salvation. Jijit while this was the case it was not as though it were a fact — that the Av^ord of God had taken none eflfect, had failed. He did not mean to say or imply that the promise made to Abraham, regard- ing his seed being bles.sed and a bless- ing, had come to nought. For, to ex- plain, they are not all true Israel, Avhich are descended from Israel. There is a spiritual in distinction from a literal, national Israel. Notice Paul's argument in Gal. 3 : 7-29. Compare our Saviour's words, John 8 : 39, "If ye were children of Abraham, ye would do the works of Abraham." 7. Neither, to illu.strate, because they are the seed, the natural de- scendants, of Abraham, are they all children in the sense contemplated in the promise, but God limited his promise, leaving out Ishmael and his descendants, saying. In Isaac shall thy seed be called, or reckoned as heirs (Gen. 21 : 12). Paul thus shows that a promise such as God gave to Abraham which apparently included all his descendants (Gen. n : 7), might be limited as in the cases of Ishmael and Isaac (Gen. 17 : 20-23), 8. That is, explaining and apply- ing the quotation, 77 is not the chil- dren of the flesh, the mere natural descendants, that are the children of God, but the children of promise are counted, or reckoned as seed — those defined by .special promise are re- garded as the genuine posterity in ques- tion. 9. For, to confirm what he had .said about "the children of promise," this is the word of promise, as fol- lows : At this time, or season of the year, will I come and Sarah shall have a son, and hence this was the son of promise. This is quoted (Gen. 18:10) aluiost literally from the Ch. IX.] ROMANS 119 10 And not only this ; but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by our 11 father Isaac ; for the children being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, (y that the purpose of God according to election might stand, ^ not of works, but of him that calleth ;) 12 it was said unto her. The elder shall 13 serve the younger. As it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated. 10 son. And not only so ; but Avhen Re- becca also had conceived by one, our 11 father Isaac (for they being not yet born, nor naving done anything good or evil, that the purpose of God ac- cording to election might stand, not of 12 works, but of him who calls), it was said to her, the elder shall serve the 13 younger. Even as it is written, Jacob I loved, But Esau I hated. y i-.n; 8: 28-30. « 11 : 6 ; Eph. 2 : 9. Hebrew, varying slightly from the Sep- tuagint. Its only bearing on the argu- ment is to show tliat the son in M'hose line the seed should be reckoned, was called by a specific promise. The promise was limited to Sarah's son. Hagar's son was also Abraham's seed, but not a son of promise. 10. And not only this, rather, And not only so, as in tlie example just cited, illustrating how God called and limited his people even among the de- scendants of Abraham ; but, in a more marked example, when Rebecca had conceived by one, by one and the same person, even our father Isaac. Isaac and Islimael had only one parent in common ; but Isaac and Esau had both in common. Both the latter though treated so diiferently were of the one and same father, even Isaac, in wliose line the seed of Abra- ham was to be reckoned, showing that not all the seed of even Isaac was the true Israel. The original is very con- cise, both in this and the next verse. 11. The whole of this verse may be regarded as in a parenthesis. The choice of Isaac had been made known after the birth and childhood of Ish- mael (Oen. n : is, 19), but the choice of Jacob rather than Esau was declared before they were born. For the chil- dren, the twins, being not yet born, neither having done any good or evil, in order that the purpose, the predetermination, of God, accord- ing to election, a choice or selection in the Divine mind, might stand, re- main permanently, not of works but of him that calleth. The reasons of this choice lay wholly in the Divine mind and not in the works or charac- ters of those chosen. It was "accord- ing to the good pleasure of his will" (Eph. 1 : 5). The purpose here has not a special reference to the election to eter- nal salvation, but to the choice of Jacob with his descendants as his chosen people. The account in Genesis (25 : 23) and the quotation in the thirteenth verse of this chapter, show that the de- scendants from the two brothers were especially intended, and that thus the choice affected all their posterity. Paul is treating of God's choice or election in its widest and most absolute respects. 12. It was said unto her, The elder shall serve the younger- quoted from the Septuagint from Gen. 25 : 23. In this verse two nations" and "two peoples" are spoken of, and it is added, "One people will be stronger than the other people; and the elder will serve the younger." In the personal history of these two broth- ers, Esau's privileges, interest, and birthright, were subjected to Jacob. In the history of their descendants it was frequently literally fulfilled. Thus David subdued the Edomites (2Sam. 8 : 14) , and subsequent conquests are mentioned (2 Kings 8:21; U : 7; 22, etc.). Finally they were conquered by John Hyrcanus and incorporated into the Jewish nation ("Jos. Antiq." XIII., 9,1). 13. And with this accords the word of the prophet : As it is written, in Mai. 1 : 23 ; Jacob have, etc. — rather, Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated. Paul is very concise, but his readers were doubtless fiimiliarwith the prophecy of ]Malachi and the history of P^sau. More fully the passage reads : ' ' Jacob I loved ; but Esau I hated and made his moun- tains a desolation, and gave his heritage to the jackals of the wilderness." Paul appears to quote this to show that the Divine purpose quoted in ver. 12 had actually been carried out. Some, how- ever, refer the words to God's original purpose respecting the brothers, giving Jacob the preference, allotting to him a 120 KOMANS [Ch. IX. 11 What shall we say then? »7s there unrighteousness with God? God for- 15 bid. For lie saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and* I will have compassion on 16 whoni I will have compassion. So then '• it is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that 17 showeth mercy. For the Scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, 14 What then shall we say ? Is there un- righteousness with God? Far be it! 15 For he says to Moses, I will have mercy on whomsoever I have mercy, and 1 will have compassion on whom- IG soever I have compassion. So then it is not of him who nills, nor of him who runs, but of (iod who has 17 mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh, For this very purpose did I raise thee up, that 1 m'ight show forth a See refs. Gen. 18 : 25. b Johu 1 : 12, 13 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 26-31 ; Heb. 12 : 17 goodly land, and barren mountains to Esau. Thus he treated one with ten- derness and affection, and the other with severity. The word hate when used in contrast to love sometimes means not positive hatred, but less love, or the absence of love. (See Gen. 29 : 30, 33.) But there is really no need of this explana- tion here, since Malachi (i = *) says, "The people against whom the Lord hath indignation forever. ' ' God's indig- nation does not partake of the unholy, passionate anger of man, but of righteous opposition to sin. Thus far Paul has shown that the right to be the children of promise depends not on mere natural descent from Abraham, nor upon any works of our own, but absolutely upon the good pleasure and free favor of God. 14-18. Paul proceeds to show that so far from there being any injustice in God's dealings with men, according to his own purpose, that these deal- ings WERE DESIGNED FOR WISE AND MERCiFiL ENDS. Tliis is illustrated by the case of Pharaoh. 14, What shall we say then ? What shall we infer? Is there un- righteousness w^ith God. Away the thouyht. The question is gen- eral, referring not merely to the case of Jacob and Esau, but to the gen- eral principle of God's government which it ilhustrated. The Jew, the ( 'liristian, and every believer in the Old Testament, would alike liold that God is supremely righteous (I's. 92 : 15). 15. I'or — to confirm and illustrate tlie negative answer which he had just given ill the preceding verse. He saith to Moses, whose name would add emphasis, and whose writings were to be received as of unquestioned au- thority. To Paul God's word was final. The quotation is from Exod. 3.'} : 19, in the words of the Septuagint ver- sion. More exactly translated : I Will have mercy on whom / have mercy and I will have compassion on whom I have conqmssion. In this, God declares that he has the absolute right of choice in the exercise of his mercy and compassion. Both mercy and compassion have reference to the exercise of sympathy and favor toward the miserable and wretched, but the latter is the stronger term, a bewailing sympathy, suited to exclamation and tears. Read the whole account in Exod. 33 : 17-23 and 34 : 5-10. Notice that in this verse God is speaking of the exer- cise of his mercy. He is perfectly free from obligation to any one in choosing the objects of his mercy. 16, So then it is evident from the declaration of God himself that it is not of him that willeth (John 1 : 13), nor of him that runneth, it is not of any act of the human Mill however strong, nor of any personal effort how- ever great (the figure is derived from the race), but of God that showeth mercy. God's mercy and grace are prominent in the apostle's mind. (Comp. Phil. 2:13.) Euiiiiing in the footrace Mas a favorite figure Mith Paul (1 cor. 9 : 24-26 ; Gal. 2 : 2 ; 5 : 7 ; Phil. 2 : 16) , 17, In this verse the apostle in- stances the case of Pharaoh, upon whom, according to the principle of ver. 1.5, God did not exercise mercy, but left him to his omii Micked Mays, and gave him up to hardness of heart. The Scripture — that is, God through the Scripture, recognizing God as its author. (Comp. Gai. 3 : 8, 22.) Pharaoh, in the very time of Moses, and a promi- nent representative case. The quota- tion is from Exod. 9 : 16, folloM'ing the Septuagint, except in the first cjause. Kven for this same purpose, for this very end in vicir, I raised thee up. The exact meaning is much dis- Ch. IX.] ROMANS 121 that I might show my power in thee, and that my name might be declared 18 throughout "all the earth. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will « he hard- eneth. my power in thee, and that my name might be announced in all the earth. IS So then, on whom he will he has mercy, and whom he will he hardens. c See refs. Exod. 4 : 21. puted. The Hebrew is: " I made thee to stand," which the Septuagint trans- lates," Thou wast preserved," or " main- tained." Since God said this after the sixth plague, he may mean that Phar- aoh had been kept in his position as an illustrious man and king thus far. But this hardly comes up to the full mean- ing of the Hebrew. Some translate the Greek as given by Paul, roused thce^ up — that is, to resistance, referring to the effect of God's dealings upon the heart of the wicked monarch. It is said that Paul draws from ver. 17 what he says in ver. 18, and therefore rouse thee up in its efiect must be nearly synonymous with hardeneth. It is an objection to this interpretation that it is too far re- moved from the natural meaning of the Hebrew, made thee to stand. The more natural meaning of the Greek is, / raised thee up, either, brought thee into existence, or raised thee up to a public position as a king, or including both ideas. This latter, however, seems too strong for the Hebrew. The general idea, " I have raised thee up as a man, | and a king to thy present position, j seems better to accord with all the ! circumstances of the case. Almost to the same effect. Dr. Arnold ("Am. Com."), extending this idea a little, says : " ' I have given thee thy place in history ', as the verb is used in Matt. 11 : 11 ; 24 : 11 : John 7 : 52, etc. This gen- eral sense alone suits the context and the apostle's argument." That I might show forth my power in thee, in thy overthrow, and that my name, in consequence of my righteous judgments upon thee, might be de- clared, pi(5/?sAc(Z abroad in all the earth, through all time and unto most distant places. This was in accordance with his own will, but for wise and beneficent ends. Thereby his name was glorified and his holy and righteous character was made known. 18. Therefore — a conclusion from the last verse and also from ver. 14-17, hath he mercy on whom he will, and whom he will he hardeneth. In the Mosaic account the two sides of this hardening are presented : (1) Pha- raoh's agency in producing it (exoci. s : 15,32; 9 :34); (2) God's agcucy in effect- ing it (Exod. 4 : 21 ; 7:3; 9 : 12 ; 10 : 20, 27 ; 11 : 10). Everywhere in the New Testa- ment the word translated harden is used in a moral sense to render obsti- nate or stubborn in impenitence (Acts 19 : 9; Heb. 3 : 13, etc.). But iu what SCUSC is it said that God hardened Pharaoh's heart ? ( 1 ) God is said sometimes to do that which he permits. Thus God is said to have moved David to number Israel (2 sam. 24 : 1), when he permitted Satan to move David to do it (ichron. 21 : 1); (2) God gives over men to their own ways, to hardness and impenitence of heart (1 : 24, 28 ; 2 Thess. 2 : 11) ; (3) God is said to do that which indirectly and incidentally results from his agency. Thus in Isa. 6 : 10 the prophet is com- manded to make the heart of this people fat and their ears heavy, etc., which would be the indirect and incidental result of his preaching. It is possible that the last two may have been united in Pharaoh's case. He was not obliged to sin ; but in the judgments upon him for his cruelty and impiety, he appears like one given over to a delusion, and w^hat would have influenced aright a well-constituted mind, led him to greater wickedness, God exercised to- ward him great forbearance (ver. 22) ^ but this only helped him forward in his wicked course. (Comp. 2 : 2, 4; 2Peter 3 : 4, 9, 15, 16. ) If any one thinks that the language demands more than the above, then it is possible that in his case God took away supernaturally his fear of consequences, and thus he was left free to act out his own evil inclinations without restraint or dread of punish- ment. The moral character of his ac- tions would not be changed, and the strong expression and Pharaoh's blind- ness to consequences, are both account- ed for. " Whatever difiiculty there lies in the assertion, that God hardeneth 122 ROMANS [Ch. IX. 19 Thou wilt say then unto me, Why doth he yet hnd fault ? For one vessel unto honour, 22 and another unto dishonour ? What if 19 Thou wilt say then to me, Why then does he still lind fault? For who re- 20 sists his will? Kay but, O man, who art thou tliat repliest against God? fcfhall the thing formed say to him who formed it. Why ditlst thou make me 21 thus? Has not the potter a right over the clay, out of the same lump to make one part a vessel unto honor. 22 and another unto dishonor? And d Job 23 : 13 ; Dan. 4 : 35. e Job 33 : 13 ; 36 : 23. / See refs. Isa. 64 :8. h Jer. 22 : 28 ; Acts 9 : 15 ; 2 Tim. 2 : 20. g Prov. 16 : 4 ; Jer. 18 : 6. whom he will, lies also in the daily course of his providence, in which we see this hardening process going on in the case of the prosperous ungodly man" (Alford). 19-29. Man not competent to CALL in question GOD'S DEALINGS. God's eight and" prerogative as Creator exercised in such a man- ner AS TO display his JUSTICE AND HIS MERCY. And THIS ACCORDS WITH PROPHECY. 19. In view of the statement of ver. 18, Paul presents an objection which he must have met in his own ex- perience and which has been common with the unrenewed in every age. Thou wilt say then unto me, from the low plane of human reason, Why doth he sti/l find fault, and blame me as responsible, when he con- trols all things according to his own will ? The question implies that there is no reason for finding fault. For Avho hath resisted, n'ho irithstands his will or purpose f The Jew was accustomed to regard all Jews elect, and all non-Jews substantially non- elect and reprobate. The idea that the Jews were largely passed over and that the true Israel was largely from among Gentiles aroused his rebellious nature against God, and even the Cliristian Jew found it difficult to adju.st his thoughts and emotions to the idea of God's supreme and absolute right to select Gentiles ratlier than Jews as mem- bers of his kingdom. It often must have produced a severe struggle, and aroused tlie old nature. 20. Nay— If7/o then art thou, for- sooth — an expression of some .severity and rebuke, iind perhaps of contempt. O man, O htnnan heinq, weak, insig- nificant, and ignorant, that thou re- pliest a§^ainst (^od, acting like a judge, questioning, tlisputing with him. the All Wise, the Almighty, and the Holy One. Unbecoming, incapable, and arrogant. ( Comp. Job 38 : i, 2 ; 40 : 1-5 ; 42:1-6.) Shall the thing formed, or molded, say to him that formed, or molded it, Why didst thou make me thus? The language .of Isa. 29 : 16 and 45 : 9 used in part. The form of the question demands a negative answer — By no means — Not to a human molder, much less to the Di\4ne Molder. The very thought is absurd. The con- ception here is not so much the creat- ing as the forming, shaping, arranging, and adjusting, that already created. It is however the Creator who is doing this. The creature is not in the posi- tion to judge his Maker, or question his wisdom or his right to do as he pleases. 21. Hath not the potter power, or a right, to decide over the clay of the same lump, or moss, mixed with water and kneaded, to make one vessel unto honor, to be put to that use, and another unto dishonor, for an ignoble use. ( Comp. 2 Tim. 2 : 20 ; 1 Cor. 12:23.) Thcrc sceius a free refer- ence to Jer. 18 : 4-6. Such familiar al- lusions and comparisons from the Old Testament would come with special force to believing Jewish readers. In the application of this question to our race, the lump would represent the mass of sinful men, who had no claim to be made vessels unto honor. The main thought, here, however, is, that God, the Maker, has the absolute right to act his own ])lcasure in the formation and government of his creatures. And accordingly, while he does not make them evil, he nuiy exercise sovereign grace, as their Creator, in choosing some from among sinful men for a nolder use, while he may employ others (litlen'utly ; but in either case he is under no obligation to give account to anv of his creatures. Ch. IX.] ROMANS 123 God, willing to show his wrath, and to make his power known, 'endured with much longsuffering the vessels of 23 wrath ^ fitted to destruction ; and that he might make known i the riches of his glory on the vessels x)f mercy, which he had "^ afore prepared unto 24 glory, even us, ° whom he hath called, o not of the Jews only, but also p of the Gentiles? what if God, willing to show forth his wrath, and to make known his power, endured in much long-suffering ves- 23 sels of wrath fitted for perdition ; and that he might make known the riches of his glory on vessels of mercy, which he before prepared for glory ; 24 whom he also called, even us, not from Jews only, but also from Gentiles ? i Num. 14 : 11, 18 ; 1 Peter 3 : 20. kl Peter 2:8; Jude 4. 12:4; Col. 1 : 27. ml Thess. 5 : 9. n 8 : 28-30 ; 1 Cor. 1:9. o Eph. 2 : 11-18. p Ps. 22 : 27. 22. Having rebuked the spirit of the objector in ver. 19, and shown the right of the maker in forming the thing made, the apostle now proceeds to apply the principle to God in his prerogative as Creator, in forming and governing all things. And what will any created being have to say, if God willing, choosing to show forth his wrath and to make known his power, that ivhich was possible on his part, that is, to exhibit his displeasure against sin and his power to punish it, endured with much long-suffer- ing vessels of wrath fitted for destruction, ready to enter into utter ruin (Phil. 3 : 19). Notice, (1) Tliat while the right of God as Creator and Judge is absolute, he exercises this right with long- suffering. (2) That the rvill and the poiver to maintain right are two grand essentials of a moral government. (3) That the long- suffering and the displeasure are both exercised toward vessels of wrath, those already connected with the Divine wrath and fallen under it. (4) It is not said of the vessels of wrath, as of those of mercy, that they were " afore prepared" (ver. 23), but merely ,^/;^ecZ, that is, prepared by obstinate persever- ance in unbelief for destruction or per- dition. Some take the verb in the middle voice and translate fitting them- selves for destruction. But the mean- ing is essentially the same in either rendering. It could hardly be said tliat God endures with much long-suf- fering what he himself has prepared. The reader might be reminded of the case of Pharaoh (ver. 17), but the imme- diate reference was to the unbelieving Jews. 23. And that he might. Some- thing needs to be mentally supplied, such as, "What if he did this?" or " What if hie endured ? " in order that he might make known the riches, etc. The idea of the patience of God seems connected with both the vessels of wrath and of mercy. "The instant destruction of the vessels of ivrath (in this case the unbelieving Jews) would have been perfectly just; but God en- dured them with long-suffering (thus tempering his justice with kindness) both the aim and the result of this being the more striking display (by the contrast) of the greatness of his grace toward the vessels of mercy" (Winer's Gram., p. 570). The riches, or tvealth, of his glory, of his goodness, grace, mercy, wisdom, and power, displayed and bestowed upon vessels of /m^/ti/ (Eph. i:6). " Of mercy (ver. 15, 16, 18, 25)^ wMch assumes the for- mer misery of the vessels " (Bengel). Which he had afore, or ivhich he before prepared for glory, by the di- vine process given in 8 : 29, 30, and according to the arrangements of his providence and grace. In thus pre- senting God as acting according to his own will, it is nowhere implied that he acts arbitrarily and without reasons. Read Jer. 18 : 1-12 as a sidelight upon this passage. 24. A continuation and expansion of the last part of the preceding verse. Even us, etc. — better, IFAom — "the vessels of mercy," he also called, even us, not from Jeivs only but also from Gentiles. The two classes are kept prominent here and throughout the Epistle — Jews and Gentiles; and also God's plans and dealings with them, especially in this and the two following chapters. The Jews are being passed over, and the Gentiles are being called ; but the heirs of promise, the vessels of mercy, are not confined to national lines. The object of God's long-suffer- ing now appears. He might have cast off the unbelieving Jews forever, but 124 ROMANS [Ch. IX. 25 As he saith also in Osee, 1 1 will call them my people, which were not my people ; and lier beloved, which was 26 not beloved. And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them. Ye are not my people ; there shall they be called the children of the living G()d. 27 Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, ^ a 28 remnant shall be saved : for he will tinish the work, and cut it short in righteousness : because a short work wull the Lord make upon the earth. 29 And as Esaias said before, Except the 25 As he says also, in Hasea, I will "call that my people, which was not my people ; And her beloved, who was not be- loved. 26 And it shall be, that in the place where it was said to them, Ye are not my people, there Avill they be called, 27 Sons of the living God. And Isaiah cries concerning Israel, If the number of the sons of Israel be as the sand of the sea, It is the remnant that will be saved ; 28 For the Lord will do a work on the earth, Finishing it and cutting it short. 29 And as Isaiah has said before, q 1 Peter 2 : 10. he spared them that the subjects of his grace might be brought to the acknowl- edgment of the truth through the ap- pointed means. ( Comp. 2 Peter 3:9.) 25. That God has exercised his own divine and absolute right of choice is shown by quotations from the Old Tes- tament: (1) In regard to Gentiles (ver. 25.26). (2) In regard to Israel (ver. 27- 29). As he saith also in Osee — the Greek for the Hebrew Hosea. The apostle gives the general sense, not the form of the Hebrew (Hosca 2 : 23), I will call, the one, my people which was not my people ; and her be- loved, tcho was not beloved. The primary reference is to the bringing back of the ten apostate tribes to alle- giance to God. But the words illus- trate a principle, and thus have a wider application. God's receiving Gentile sinners is in accordance with what he had in the past declared to be his mode of procedure. Compare the same text quoted in 1 Peter 2 : 10, which is an important parallel passage. 26. Another quotation to the same effect from Hosea 1 : 10, given almost exactly from the Septuagint. And it shall be, that in the place — whether in the temple, in Palestine, or wherever it may be — where it was said unto them, etc. By analogy and imy)lication Gentiles are included in this Old Testament prophecy. ( Comp. Eph. 2 : 11, 19-22.) 27. Esaias also, etc. Rather, And Isaiah crieth aloud concerning Israel. Paul proceeds to confirm wliat he had said and implied in ver. 24, in regard to the Jews. Wliile they would be largely pas.sed over, some would be saved. The quotation is from Isa. 10 : 22, 23, nearly as in the Septua- gint, giving the general sense of the passage, which is peculiarly difficult in the Hebrew. Though — better, If— the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, it is the remnant only that shall be saved. The apostle does not say, nor does he mean, that these words, pri- marily referred to the particular case he had in hand, but he uses them to illustrate a principle, which if appli- cable in one case would be applicable in this analogous case. Shall be saved — in Hebrew shall return. The return is to God by repentance (is»- i0:2i)j which results in salvation (Acta 2:37). 28. The quotation is continued, de- claring that what was predicted would be certainly and speedily executed. For he will finish the work, etc. The readings of manuscripts vary much here. The most approved is : The Lord n'ill execute his ivord upon the earth, finishing if and emitting it short. He would bring the work to which his word referred to an end, and hasten it to a conclusion. Paul brings out the point of the Hebrew sufficiently and fairly for his purpose. The Lord will execute summary judgments on Israel, leaving only a remnant saved through mercy. So a remnant will now be saved through the same mercy. 29. A further confirmation from prophecy regarding the remnant only that shoidd be saved. And, the small number of Jewi.sh believers fulfills another prediction, as Isaiah said before, earlier than the one just Ch. IX.] ROMANS 125 Lord of Sabaoth had left us a seed, we had been as Sodoma, and been made like unto Gomorrah. The Jews rejected for unbelief; faith indis- pensable to salvation. 30 WHAT shall we say then? ^That the Gentiles, which followed not after righteousness, have attained to right- eousness, "even the righteousness 31 which is of faith : but Israel, ^ which followed after the law of righteous- ness, hath not attained to the law of 32 righteousness. Wherefore? y Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were by the works of the law. For *they If the Lord of Sabaoth had not left us a seed. We should have become as Sodom, And been made like to Gomorrah. 30 What then shall we say ? That Gen- tiles, who were not following after righteousness, obtained righteousnass, but righteousness which is of faith ; 31 but Israel, following after a law of righteousness, did not arrive at [such] 32 a law. Wherefore? Because [they sought it] not by faith, but as if it were by works of law. They stumbled « Isa. 13 : 19 ; Jer. 50 : 40. « 1 : 18-32 : 10 : 20. m 1 : 17 ; Phil. 3:9. 1 10 : 2 ; 11 : 7. y 4 : 16 ; 10 : 3. z Luke 2 : 34 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 23. quoted. This is from Isa. 1 : 9, and quoted exactly from the Septuagiiit. Except the Lord of Sabaoth {of Hosts, or Armies, as often in the Old Testament) had left us a seed (the Hebrew equivalent is, "a small rem- nant"), we had become as Sodom, and had been made like unto Go- morrah. The prophet describes the temporal calamity then endured by the people, which would have resulted in their total destruction had it not been for God's sparing mercy. They were indeed representatives and types of the spiritual future. The fact that tliey were Jews did not then save them, neither would it now. Notice through all the argument of this chapter how the mercy, long-suifering, and patient endurance of God are kept prominent (ver. 6. 15, 16, 18, 22, 24, 25, etc.). Had itnot been for Divine love, all, both Jews and Gentiles, would have been lost, 30-33. Conclusion of the discussion of the chapter. The passing over of Israel, though comprehended in THE Divine purpose, was through their own fault. How Gentiles at- tained unto righteousness. The reason of Israel's failure. 30. What shall we say then to this ? What conclusion shall we draw from this argument? The result was not such as either Jew or Gentile would have expected. But Paul answers in the light of the whole preceding discus- sion, and of the righteousness through faith which he had developed. We say then. That the Gentiles, better, That Gentiles, that portion of them that had believed on Christ, vho fol- lowed not after righteousness, I having no revelation to hold up this [ object for their attainment, obtained I righteousness, not of works as man might expect, but righteous7iess which is of faith, the true righteousness. The figure of the race-course and ob- taining the prize is used. Gentiles, though they ran not after righteousness, yet obtained righteousness at the goal of the race-course, but not of works, or ] merits of their own, but through faith, i as a result from faith. I 31. But Israel, the greater part of the nation, tvho followed after a law^ of _ righteousness, this being 1 their object in observing the Mosaic law, and its perfect observance would have secured righteousness (Luke lo : 28), did not arrive at that /aw, or at such a lau\ They did not attain their object, the law did not prove to be a law of righteousness to them ; they did not at- tain to that principle of holy life which would insure their acceptance with God. The last righteousness is not found in the best manuscripts ; but it is clearly understood. 32. Wherefore this failure on Is- rael's part ? This was the special ques- tion that now needed solving. He had suggested the answer regarding Gen- tiles. God had called them (ver. 23, 24), and they had attained it through faith (ver. 31). But why did Israel fail, when Gentiles succeeded? Because they sought it not by faith, but as it were, better, biit as being from works of law, as though righteousness were to be attained in that way. " 'As ' suggests that such a pursuit was only a vain imagination" (BoiSE). According to many critics, of the law should be 126 ROJVIANS [Ch. IX. 33 stumbled at that stumblingstone ; as it is written, Behold, I lay in Sion a 8tumblinj,^stone and rock of offence : and a whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 33 against the stone of stumbling ; as it is written, Beliold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling, and a rock of of- fense ; and he that believes on him shall not be put to shame. omitted. In either case the meaning is tlie same. Tlie word law, if omitted, is implied, and there is much manu- script authority for it. For, is omit- ted by the best authorities. The thought however is implied. They stumbled at that stumbling- stone, better, against the stone of stumhiing, the well-known stone, fore- told in the next verse. 33. This is a composite quotation, uniting two passages from Isaiah (28 : le ; 8 : 14) and follows closely the Hebrew\ The Jews referred both quotations to the Messiah. The former declares, Be- hold I lay in Zion " a stone, a tried stone, a precious corner stone of a sure foundation." Instead of these words in quotation marks, Paul substitutes from the latter passage, a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense, which evidently referred to the Messiah. Com- pare the same passages, quoted in 1 Peter 2 : 6, 8. See also Simeon's allu- sion to Isa. 8 : 14, 15, in speaking of Jesus as " set for the falling and rising of many in Israel" (i-uko2:34). Such references in ancient prophecy were often made in times of calamity to the Messiah as an encouragement to his people. They showed that God had purposes which ensured their safety. They implied that many woidd stumble and be oifended at the Messiah, and perish ; but that those who believed on him should not be put to shame, but would realize all their hopes. Shall not be ashamed — from the Septua- gint. The Hebrew is "shall not make haste," that is, shall not flee in terror. This yields a secondary meaning, shall have no reason for fear or shame, shall not be confounded. Thus while Paul gives the reason of Israel's failing so largely of the l>enetits of the Messiah, he indicates that it was their own fault. " He came to his own and his own re- ceived him not " (J"iin i : n). Practical Remarks. 1. Christian experience has to do Avith the innermost depths of the heart, and is attested by conscience and the Spirit ( ver. 1 ; Acts 23 : 1 ; 8 : 10, 2G). 2. The extremes of joy and sorrow often meet in the Christian's soul (ver. 2 ; 8 : 38, 39; 2 Cor. 2 : 2-4, 12-14). 3. It is a distinguishing mark of soul- winners that they are deeply concerned and often heavily burdened for the sal- vation of sinners (ver, 1-3 ; Phil. 3 : 18 ; Gal. 4 : 19). 4. It is natural and right that we should be anxious for the salvation of our kin- dred (ver. 3, 4 ; 10 : 1 ; Esther 8:6). 5. Our external relations to the people of God may prove our ruin (ver. 4, 5 ; 10 : 2,3). 6. Christ is the God-man who is over all, blessed forever (ver. 5 ; 1 : 3, 4 ; Matt. 28 : 18; Johnl : 1, 18). 7. God knows no failure in his promises or his purposes (ver. 6 ; 2 Peter 3:9; Isa. 55 : 11). 8. No external circumstances such as pious parents, church ordinances and privileges, can make us true children of God (ver. 6-8, 4. 15 ; 3 : 9-18 ; Luke 3:8). 9. They only who are born of the Spirit are the children of promise, and hence the true children of God (ver. 6-9 ; John 1 : 13). 10. " Though children prior to birth do neither good nor evil, yet they may be naturally depraved. They neither hun- ger nor thirst, yet are hunger and thirst natural appetites. They exercise neither love nor anger, yet these are natural pas- sions. They know probably neither joy nor sorrow, yet these are natural emo- tions " (HoDGE). (Ver. 9-11 ; Gen. 6:5; 8 : 21 ; Jer. 17 : 9 ; Ps. 51 : 3-5 ; 58 : 3, 4). 11. God had a plan in making all things, a purpose in arranging all events, and an election or selection of his people (ver. 11-13 ; Heb. 3 : 4 ; 1 Thess. 1:4; Eph. 3: 11). 12. Election is according to the fore- knowledge of God. As we cannot con- ceive a time when the Allwise God had not decreed, nor when he did not fore- Ch. X.] ROMANS 127 know, we must conclude that his decrees and foreknowledge were coexistent and coeternal (ver. 11-13 ; 8 : 29 ; 1 Peter 1:2). 13. The thought that there can be any unrighteousness in God is repugnant to a rightly constituted mind and cannot for a moment be entertained. He is the im- mutable standard of right and truth (ver. 4; 3 :6; Gen. 18:25). 14. Scriptural election is unconditional but beneficent, according to God's own good and absolute pleasure. Men are elected to salvation but not to perdition (ver. 14-16 ; Eph. 1 : 11, 12 ; 1 Tim. 2:4.) 15. God is in no sense the author of sin. The wicked are their own destroyers. If left to their own wicked course they have no right to complain (ver. 17-20; Rev. 15 : 4; Hoseal3 : 9). 16. God's glory, the manifestation of his perfections, is the greatest and highest end of all things (ver. 17, 22, 23 ; Rev. 4 : 11). 17. " It is not optional with God whether he shall be wise, or great, or just, or true, or holy ; but it is optional with him whether he shall show mercy to sinners or leave them to perish in their sins. How appropriate then the publican's prayer, ' God be merciful to me, a sinner ' " (Pen- dleton) . (Ver. 17-20 ; Matt. 20 : 15 ; 2 Tim. 2: 13; Luke 18: 13). 18. God's sovereignty and man's free agency must both be accepted as the teaching of Scripture. We must believe that they are in complete harmony. The free moral agency of men and human re- sponsibility appear to be not only a matter of fact but also a divine decree (ver. 19- 24 ; Ps. 110 : 3 ; Ezek. 18:4, 20-32). 19. It is because man is ignorant and depraved that he finds fault with his Maker (ver. 19 ; Job 42 ; 3-6). 20. The doctrine of election appears as a fact and a principle of the divine gov- ernment in the case of Israel (ver. 12-18, 27-29; 11 : 7). 21. In election Grod is but carrying out his own inherent right as Creator and Former of all things and Ruler of the universe (ver. 19-24 ; Dan. 4 : 35). 22. God may also exercise a personal election in the choice of individuals to eternal life (ver. 24, 27, 29 ; 8 : 28-30 ; Acts 13:48). 23. Men as fallen intelligent beings are considered as objects of election (ver. 21 ; Eph. 2:10). 24. Opposition to the doctrine of elec- tion shows a want of confidence in God as the moral governor of the universe (ver. 19-21 ; Ps. 94 : 10). 25. How wonderful the patience of God toward sinners, and how surprising their abuse of it (ver. 22 ; 2:2-4; 1 Peter 3 : 9, 15; 2 Peter 2: 1-3). 26. God has his own wise and good rea- sons, which if known would explain why some are saved and some are lost, the ground of the condemnation of sinners being always in themselves (ver. 2.5-33 ; John 3 : 18, 19). 27. In the doctrine of election we catch a glimpse of God's plan of working, of the secret things that belong to him ; but in other things revealed we see plainly our duty (ver. 30 ; Dent. 29 : 29). 28. The doctrine of election should pro- duce humility, submission, confidence, peace, and diligence (ver. 22-33; Ps. 115 : 1 ; 2 Peter 1 : 10 ; Phil. 2 : 12, 13). 29. The doctrine of election should be preached only in love and in great ten- derness (ver. i, 2, 22, 29 ; 10 : 1 ; 11 : 20, 21 ; Luke 19 : 41, 42). See " Homiletic Uses of the Doctrine of Election," Bibliotheca Sa- cra, Jan., 1893, pp. 79-92. 30. Salvation does not come to men ar- bitrarily but is obtained through faith, or lost through unbelief (ver. 30-32 ; Mark 16 : 16). 31. Error and self-righteousness often prove a greater hindrance to salvation than vice or crime (ver. 30-32 ; Matt. 21 : 31). 32. Christ becomes to every man under the gospel either a sure foundation or a stone of stumbling (ver. 33 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 23, 24; 2 Cor. 2: 16). 33. The Christian will never be disap- pointed or brought to shame through Christ (ver. 33 ; 7 : 25 ; 8 : 37). CHAPTER X. In this chapter Paul views Israel as unsaved through misguided zeal and ig- norance, though the gospel is adapted and designed for all, and should be preached to all. In chap. 9 the passing over Israel is viewed from the Divine 128 ROMANS [Ch. X. 10 BRETHREN, »> my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they 2 might Ije saved. For I bear them record ^that they have a zeal of God, tliey may be saved. For I testify for them, that they have a zeal for God, 3 but not according to knowledge. For being ignorant of the righteousness of God, and seeking to establish their own, they did not subject themselves 4 to the righteousness of God. For 6 9:1-3; 1 Cor. 9 : 20-22. c 9 : 31 ; John 16 : 2 ; Acts 22 : 3 ; Gal. 1 : 14. d 1 Tim. 1 : 13. e 1 : 17 ; 9 : 30. / Luke 16 : 15 ; Phil. 3:9; Rev. 3 : 17, 18. g 3 : 25-31 ; Matt. 5 : 17 ; Acts 13 : 38, 39 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 30 ; Gal. 3 : 24 ; Heb. 9 : 7-14. side ; ill chap. 10, from the human side. In the former, Paul more especially views his kindred as lost, witli a rem- nant saved ; in this, as savable, from the salvation side, thougli as a people rebellious. In both chapters God is just, faithful, and righteous, and the guilt of Israel entirely their own. In both the exteu.sion of the gospel to Gen- tiles is shown to be according to proph- ecy. 1-4. Jews savable, yet rxsAYED. The keasoxs given. 1. Brethren — both Jews and Gen- tiles of the church at Rome. There- fore he speaks of Israel in the third in- stead of the second per.son. My heart's desire, longing preference indeed, im- plying some thought to be supplied. It would indeed l)e the joy and preference of my heart, though I know it is other- wise ordered. The obstacles to their salvation are brought out in the two fol- lowing verses. And prayer to God for Israel — rather, according to the best text, for f hem is (that is, for Israel, 9 : 31), that they might be saved — hii'VuUj, for their salvation. Their sal- vation would fill his heart with delight, and for this he prayed. "While he knew that they were rebellious and God had otherwi.se directed, he did not regard their case as hopeless. In order to un- derstand Paul fully in this verse and 9 : 1-3, we must put ourselves back in liis place. The Jews considered them- .selves superior to all other nations in matters of religion, and the idea that Gentiles were as good as they, and could be saved as well, was exceedingly re- pugnant to their feelings. The apostle knew this dislike, and he wished toim- I)ress his brethren with his inten.«ie de- sire and love for them. Compare Acts '22 : 21, 22, describing a scene a few months later. 2. In this and the next verses Paul gives reasons for his afiectionate long- ings for their salvation, and Avhy they did not attain it. For I bear them record, J testify for them, as one who knows by intimate acquaintance and also by experience, that they have a zeal of God — better, /or God — but not according to knowledge, to full knowledge of God and his plan of salvation. Their knowledge was not in proportion to their zeal. Like him- self once, they acted " ignorantly in unbelief" ( l Tim. l : is ; Acts 13 : 27) . But ignorance under the full light of the gospel, and their own Scriptures, was a crime ; and thus their misdirected zeal was sinful. 3. For, thus acting not according to a full and proper knowledge, they being ignorant of God's right- eousness, of which he is the author, and which he reveals and imparts ( 3 : 21) , and going about, or, seeking, to es- tablish their own righteousness — to found a righteousness by their own acts — have not submitted — better, did not subject themselves, to the right- eousness of God, and thus did not accept in submission and faith the righteousness which he has ofiered, and which avails before him. The second righteousness in this verse is omitted by the best authorities. Seeking to estab- lish their own, they withheld from God his due, and rejected his ottered right- eousness. That their misguided zeal and ignorance might be removed was doubtless the apostle's earnest prayer. 4. For introduces an important dec- laration, and an explanation of their failure in not subjecting themselves to the righteousness of God. Literally, For the end of the law is Christ into righteousness, leading into righteous- ness, as a means of attaining right- Ch. X.] KOMANS 129 the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth. For Moses describeth the righteous- ness wliich is of the law, "That the man which doeth those things shall Christ is the end of law for righteous- ness, to every one that believes. 5 For Moses" writes that the man who has done the righteousuesj; which is of 6 the law, shall live in it. But the right- h iseh. 9 : 29 ; Ezek. 20 : 11. eousness to every one that believeth. In- stead of seeking to establish their own, they ought, therefore, to have accepted God's righteousness. But how is Christ the end of the law? According to some he is the end or termination of the law as a system or means of obtaining righteousness, so that every believer may be justified as such by faith apart from legal obedience (6 : u ; i ■.i,&: Gai. 3 : 11-12). According to others, Christ is the end or aim of the law — its ai?n. being the coming and work of Christ, who alone is able to secure righteousness for us. The aim of the law was to make men righteous, and this alone is accom- plished in Christ. Or the aim of the law as a schoolmaster was to lead to Christ ( Gal. 3 : 23, 24 ; comp. 1 Peter 1:9:1 Tim. 1:5). Others, that he is the end, the fiUfiller of the law, having perfectly obeyed its moral precepts in his life, and fulfilled its tj^pes and sacrifices in his death and resurrection. And thus he wrought out a righteousness which is accounted reckoned to the believer. The word laiv is here emphatic, and the scope of the passage is very broad, and much of all pertaining to the above views may be included. Christ is the consummation of the law, including necessarily the aim or scope of the law which terminates as a covenant of works in him. He accomplishes for the be- liever that which the law, if perfectly obeyed, would have secured, namely, acceptance with God and consequent holiness. This accords well not only with \vhat precedes, but with the com- parison which follows in ver. 5-10. The apostle thus prepares the way also for showing that Christ should be preached To every one that believeth. It was very offensive to the self-righteous Jew to tiiink that the Gentile whom he despised should stand on the same level with himself. His heart revolted at the thought of salvation through faith on the same terms to all (ver. 12). 5-13. The gospel is adapted and designed for all. 5. Confirmatory of the truth stated in ver. 4, Paul introduces a comparison between the righteousness of the law and the righteousness of faith. For Moses describeth, or writeth, etc. According to the best Greek text, For Jloses writeth that the man who has done the righteousness which is of the law shall live iyi it, in that righteousness as a basis or sphere of life. (Comp. 6:2; Col. 3:7.) He that obeys the law's de- mands shall live, enjoy God's favor, on the ground of perfect obedience. ' ' This do and thou shalt live" (Luke 10 : 28). But this very standard brought con- demnation ; for no one can keep the law (chap. 1-3). Even one transgression broke the law, and condemnation en- sued ( Gal. 3 : 10-12) . The Quotation is from Lev. 18 : 5. Shall live— not in the lower sense of a prosperous life in the land of promise, but in the higher sense of eternal life, the favor of God and eternal happiness. " Jewish interpre- ters themselves included in it (life) more than mere earthly felicity in Canaan, and extended their view to a better life hereafter" (Alfoed). It should be noted that Paul attributes Leviticus to Moses as its author. 6, 7, 8. Paul contrasts the right- eousness which is of faith with the righteousness which is of the law, using Dent. 30 : 11-14, quoted freely, with a running commentary upon it, and ap- plying it to Christ who is the end of the law, and to the gospel to which the law was preparatory. Paul does not mean to say that Moses applied the words as he applies them here. But Moses was speaking of future departures of Israel from God and his law, and of future returns to him. And he afiirms that this commandment which he gives them is not far off", but near them and easily to be ascertained. They were to turn to the Lord with all their heart and all their soul (Deut. 30 : 10). In this they would exercise repentance and faith. The righteous under the old dispensa- tion lived by faith (Heb. 11), and faith was accounted for righteousness (4:9). The prominent thing in Lev. 18 : 5 130 ROMANS [Ch. X. 6 live by them. > But the righteousness which is of faith spcaketh on this wise, Say not iu thiuc heart, Who shall ascend int18-20. « Nahuni 1 : 15. t John 12 : 37 ; Heb. 4 : 2. passage was quoted more fully at Pen- tecost (Acts 2 : 21)^ and refers to Messianic times. The name of the Lord applies to Christ, and includes all that his name imports — Redeemer, Saviour, Lord, and final Judge. The Hebrew in Joel is "the name of Jehovah." Its application to Christ in this verse, which is also demanded by the next verse, distinctly marks the divinity of our Lord. Shall call implies faith (next verse), and a recognition and ac- knowledgment of Christ as a Saviour ex- alted to give repentance and the for- giveness of sins (Acts 5 : 31). 14-21. The gospel SHorLD be PREACHED TO ALL. The heathen must be evangelized. Missionary intima- tions in the Old Testament. 14. If the prophets foretold salvation to all, Jews and Gentiles, who should turn to the Messiah, then there was need of preachers and missionaries. ^ Here we have an argument for evangelizing the heathen against Pharisaic jealousy and exclusivenes.s. If then this is the case, as just stated, with Jews and Gentiles (ver. 13), How thcii shall they call on him in Avhoni they have not believed? Calling on the name of the Lord supposes faitli in the message. Such calling as resulted in salvation supposed saving faith (ver. 4-10), But salvation was only to those belie%nng ; and hence the language is equally ap- plicable to unbelieving Jews and Gen- tiles. If the Jews, for example, be- lieve not on the Messiah when he comes, as was foretold (ver. le), then how shall they call upon him and be saved? And how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard, or of whom they heard not. Thus faith pre-supposes liearing, and hearing a preacher. The language is api)licable to both Jews and Gentiles, especially to the latter. Without this universal pro- clamation of the gospel, God's design to extend universally the gospel could not be accomplished. 15. And now shall they preach except they be sent forth by the Lord and the churches (Acts 13 : 2, 3). If they failed to do this through indiflfer- ence or through prejudice or jealousy, how then could the predicted evangeli- zation take place ? As it is written — showing God's design to have such mes- sengers, and the glad welcome given to their message. The quotation is a free rendering of Isa. 52 : 7, and has pri- mary reference to the return of the people from captivity, which return was typical of a more glorious one of the true Israel under the gospel. How beautiful the feet — the very foot- steps bearing them on over mountain and vale in their divine mission — of them that preach the glad tidings of peace (0: l; 8:6: Eph. 2 : 14, 15, 17; 4:3; 6:15), and bring glad tidings of good things, the rich saving blessings of salvation. The words preach the gospel of peace and, are not found in some of the oldest and best manu- scripts and are omitted by some of the best latest critics. Preachers called of God and directed by the Spirit must be sent forth so that Jews and Gentiles might hear and be vsaved, or be without excuse if thev believed not (ver. ic-is). Comp. Isa. 52': 10 : "The Lord hath laid bare his holy arm in the ej^es of all nations ; and all the ends of the earth shall see the salvation of our God." Paul uses the plural them for the He- brew singular him. The one rej)resents a class ; the other, individuals of that class. 16. But while the glad tidings were joyfully welcomed by niany, they were rejected also, especially by a large por- tion of Israel. It might be urged as an objection, that the messengers and mes- Ch. X.] ROMANS 133 have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, "Lord, Avho hath be- 17 lieved our report ? So then ^ faith Cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God. 18 But I say, Have they not heard? Yes verily, y their sound went into all the earth, « and their words unto the 19 ends of the world. But I say. Did not Israel know? First Moses saith, »! tidings. For Isaiah says, Lord, who 17 believed our report? So then faith comes of hearing, and hearing through 18 the word of Christ. But I say, did they not hear? Yes, verily ; Their sound went out into all the earth. And their words to the ends of the world. 19 But I say, did Israel not know ? First Moses says, M John 12 : 38. x Ver. 14 ; 1 Thess. 2 : 13. z See 1 Kings 18 : 10 ; Matt. 4 : 8. y Matt. 2-t : 14 ; 28 : 19 ; Col. 1 : 6, 23. all : 11. sage had only partially succeeded. But this is what was foretold. But, though thus proclaimed, they have not — rather, they did not all obey the glad tidings — this preaching of the gospel viewed as ideally past. And this ac- cords with the words of the prophet, For Esaias saith, ^Mio believed our report ? A question suggesting a negative answer, implying a very gen- eral unbelief, as exhibited by the Jews. The question is from Isa. 53 : 1, accord- ing to the Septuagint. Report — liter- ally, the things heard, which were to be believed, resulting in salvation, or dis- believed, resulting in inexcusable con- demnation^ 17. An immediate conclusion from the preceding verse, and also of the argument from ver. 14. Accordingly then faith cometh by hearing, as a result of hearing. The things heard (ver. 16) were regarded by the prophet as the appointed means for believing ("Who hath believed?"). Hence hearing precedes faith, and the right kind of hearing results in faith. And hearing comes by, or through, the word of God, or according to many authorities, the ivord of Christ, that which has been spoken of God, or of Christ. The meaning is essentially the same. It is implied that the revealed message must be proclaimed in order to hearing. The several links of the evangelizing chain of ver. 14 and 15 are necessary. The gospel should be preached even though many reject it, both to Jews and Gentiles. 18. But I say. Have they, or bet- ter, did they not heart this universal message. Has the word of God been proclaimed, and the revelation of Christ made known, and yet not heard ? By no means. Yes, verily, to use the language of the psalmist (ps. i9:4) in reference to the heavens which declare the glory of God, their sound, the proclamation of these messengers, went into all the earth, and their words unto the ends of the Avorld, the inhabited ivorld. It was natural for Paul, as often now with preachers, to clothe his thoughts with the words of Scripture. And most appropriately too, for Paul saw in the universal revelation in the natural Avorld an illustration and type of the world-wide message of the gospel. All revelation of God, whether natural or revealed, came through Christ (John 1:9). A certain uniformity and analogy prevails in God's words and works. The universal voice of the one was the prelude of the universal voice of the other. It had become a fact too in Paul's day. Not only was the gospel proclaimed to both Jews and Gentiles, but starting from Pentecost it had gone witli the converts to their homes in every nation under heaven " (Acts 2: 5). The apo.stles, the disciples " scattered abroad " (Acts 8:5), mission- aries and evangelists, had penetrated the uttermost parts of the earth (i5 : i9; James 1:1; Col. 1 : 23 ; 1 Peter 1:1; 5 : 13). The quotation is from the Septuagint. The Hebrew line is used of a string of a musical instrument and thence a sound, " Their sound," etc. 19. But I say, perhaps anticipat- ing a possible objection. Did not Is- rael know? Is it possible that Israel was ignorant of this, the preaching of the gospel to botli Jews and Gentiles ? Was he ignorant of the purposes of God in respect to the reception of the gospel by the Gentiles, and their own unbelief? No, it was not possible, for first, in order of time and of a line of like predictions and warnings, Moses saith (Deut. 32 :2i), in reference to the extension of the gospel to the Gentiles, 13-t ROMANS [Ch. X. will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish iia- 20 tion I will anger you. But Esaias is very bold, and saith, ^i was found of them that sought me not ; 1 was made manifest unto them that asked not 21 after me. But to Israel he saith, All day long T have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsay- ing people. I will provoke you to jealousy by those who are no people. By a nation without understanding I will provoke you to anger. 20 But Isaiah is very bold, and says, I was found by those who sought me not; I became manifest to those who asked not after me. 21 But as to Israel he says, All the day long, I spread out my hands To a disobedient and gainsaying people. I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people in the eyes of Israel, despised by them, and by a foolish nation, one without understanding, unenlightened. I will anger you, or provoke you to anger. Their jealousy and anger would be aroused in seeing their privileges and blessing transferred to nations whom they had regarded as degraded and fool- ish. How striking the meaning and fulfillment of these words to Paul's mind as he saw the prejudice and oppo- sition of the Jews to Gentile Christi- anity and to himself as an apostle to the Gentiles. The quotation is from the Septuagint of Deut. 32 : 21. But from this the Jews might have known that if they forsook God he would trans- fer their pri\ileges to others. 20. But Esaias is very bold and more decisive than Moses, and saith in regard to the Gentiles, I was found of them that sought me not, I was made manifest unto them that asked not after me. This is from Isa. 65 : 1, quoted from the Septuagint, the two clauses being in- verted by the apostle, perliaps to em- phasize I have found." This verse runs parallel with 9 : 30. The closing words of Isaiah 05 : 1, " Unto a nation that was not called V)y my name," plainly shows that tlic rcfi'rence is to Gentiles. And so Paul understood it and used it. 21. But God, through Isaiah, to Israel, saith, immediately after in the same chapter (n... 65 2). All day long (pomp. jir. 7 : 13) I havc stretchod forth my hands, in tlie attitude of earnest entreaty, unto a disobe- dient and gainsaying, or contra- dicting, people. Quoted from the Sep- tuagint. The Hebrew has "a rebellious people." Free agency and human re- s'ponsibility are here recognized. The apostle is very brief and his argument is somewhat obscure, quoting Scripture without comment and allowing it to speak for itself. His general design is plain. The Jews knew, or ought to have known, from Moses and the prophets, that the gospel was to be ex- tended to the Gentiles, and therefore should be preached to them. They had also been fully warned of their own re- bellion and unbelief. Practical Remarks. 1. So long as there is any hope for the salvation of a sinner, we should labor and pray for him (ver. 1 ; Gen. 18 : 23-32). 2. Zeal may be productive of great good or great evil. It should be tested in the light of God's truth (ver. 2 ; Acts 26 : 9-11, 20, 22, 23). 3. Ignorance under the gospel may be a palliation, but not an excuse for reject- ing it (ver. 3 ; 1 Tim. 1 : 13 ; Luke 23 : 34 ; 2 Peter 3 :5). 4. There is no greater hindrance to sal- vation than self-righteousness. Without renouncing it, the sinner cannot submit himself to the righteousness of God (ver. 3 ; Luke 18 : 11-13 ; Phil. 3 : 3-11). 5. The law system 'as a covenant of works is ended in Christ (ver. 4 ; Gal 3 : 21,22; Heb. 8: 13; 12:24). 6. "The law says, 'Do this and live'; the gospel says, ' Live, and do this ' " (Pendleton). The spiritual life through faith in Christ is the source of all right doing (ver. 5-8 ; John 5 : 24 ; Gal. 5 : 22-25). 7. Palvatiou by works is as impracti- cable for a sinner as ascending introhahle from the nature of the case. 11. I say then — calling attention to a false conclusion which some might draw, and guarding against it. Have they stumbled— rather, Did they stumble, when as a nation they rejected the Messiah in order that they might fall absolutely and finally, as a judg- ment upon them, and never be won back to Christ ? This may be asked of the nation i^-^'^), or of the rest who were hardened, the representatives of the nation ( ver. 7 ) . It is said they stum- bled with reference to 9 : 32, though a different word is used, but both words refer to their rejection of Christ, (comp. 1 Cor. 1 : 23 ; Gal. 5 : II. ) The fall resulting from the stumbling implies ruin, de- struction. The stu7t)bling denotes a temporary lapse; the fall, final, absolute ruin. Paul admits the former, but de- nies the latter. God forbid, i^ar//'om if. The word that, in order that, in- troduced a false purpose, but at the same time suggested that there might be some other purpose. But rather through their fai\,ofl'cnse or trespass, as the word is rendered in 5 : 15-17, Ch. XI.] ROMANS 139 Gentiles, rfor tx) provoke them to jeal- 12 ousy. Now if tlie fall of them he ^ the riches of the world, and the diminish- ing of them the riches of the Gentiles ; 13 how much more * their fulness ! For I speak to j^ou Gentiles, inasmuch as " I am the apostle of the Gentiles, I mag- the Gentiles, to provoke them to 12 rivalry. Now if their trespass is the riches of the world, and their diminu- tion the riches of the Gentiles, how 13 much more their fullness? But I am speaking to you the Gentiles. Inas- much, then as I am an apostle of the r Ver. 14 ; 10 : 19. s Ver. 15. t Isa. 11 : 11-16 ; Micah 4:1,2; 5:7. w 15 : 16 ; Acts 9 : 15 ; 13 : 2 ; Gal. 2 : 2, 7-9 ; Eph. 3 : 8 ; 1 Tim. 2 : 7. 18, 20, literally their falling aside. The idea is a temporary not final falling aside into unbelief and rejecting Christ. By it an occasion occurred, so that sal- vation (which was "of the JeAvs," (John 4: 22)) is come uuto the Gen- tiles (Acts 28: 28) foT tO pFOVOke them, the Jews, to jealousy, or rivalry — excite them to emulation to recover the blessings they had lost (Phii. 1 : 15-18). Thus the unbelief of the Jews benefited the Gentiles, in immedi- ate offers of the gospel to them ( Acts is : 6), and also in depriving the Jews of the power of insisting that Gentiles should come under the Mosaic law, "The salvation of Gentiles was indeed always in the Divine purpose : but Jewish un- belief was the occasion which that purpose took for its actual develop- ment " (MOULE). (Matt. 21 : 43; 22 : 9; Acts 13 : 46; 15 : 16, 17.) 13. In this argument Paul has in mind the future restoration of Israel. If their stumbling and rejection were the occasion of so much good, how much more good must result from their resto- ration (ver. 12, 15) ? ]Vow if their fall, trespass, falling aside into unbelief, be the riches of the \vorld, in salva- tion to the Gentiles, bringing to them "the unsearchable riches of Christ" (Eph. 3:8); and the diminishing of them, their reduction to an inferior spiritual state or condition through un- belief, the riches of the Gentiles, how much more their fulness, their restoration to all the blessings of Christ's kingdom and to the full enjoy- ment of tliem ! How much more will this result in the spiritual riches of the world and of the Gentiles ! The word translated diminishing means a less- ening, a being made less, hence a induc- tion, to an inferior state or condition. It is found elsewhere only in 1 Cor. 6 : 7, and in Isa. 31 : 8 (Septuagint). It is here opposed to fullness, the filling of them which is spoken of the restora- tion of the Jews to the blessings of the kingdom of God. Notice that the words them, them, and their refer to the Jews as a people or nation. Some find the idea of numbers in the words diminishing and fulness, thus : If their reduction as God's people to a small number is the riches of the Gentiles, how much more their increase to the full numTyer. I prefer, however, the former interpretation, as it accords bet- ter with the spiritual idea of Jewish condition implied in ver. 15 and in the whole context. 13. For — according to the most ap- proved reading, But, I speak, or say, this to you the Gentiles, referring to the thought in the two preceding verses. He now and throughout the rest of the chapter addresses the Gen- tile converts as distinct from the Jew- ish believers in the church at Rome. He speaks of the Jews in the third person and treats the Gentiles as a body to be benefited. He thus showed both' his devotion to his Gentile apos- tleship, and his earnest desire for the spiritual welfare of his own kin- dred. It has also been inferred from this that the main body of Roman Christians were Gentiles. There was in Paul's day a great gulf of prejudice between Jews and Gentiles. This would naturally show itself in churches composed of both classes. The apostle had endeavored to lessen this prejudice arnong his Jewish brethren. He now strives to overcome it among Gentile believers. The Jews had been a chan- nel and occasion of blessing to them ; and their debtors they were. (comp. 15 : 27). Compare Acts 16 : 20-22, where we get a glimpse of the Roman con- tempt for the Jews. Inasmuch as — giving his reason for personally addressing them, I am an apostle of the Gentiles (is : 12-19; Acts 9 : 15; Gal. 2 : 7, 8 ; Eph. 3 :8 ; 1 Thess. 1 : 14-16). A self-consciousness of his noble mis- sion here finds expression. I magnify mine office, or glorify my ministry, 140 ROMANS [Ch. XI. 14 nify mine office : if by any means I may provoke to emulation them which are my flesh, and might save some of 15 them. For if ^the casting away of them he the reconciling of the world, what shall the receiving of them he, but 16 life from the dead ? For if y the first- fruit he holy, the lump is also holy : 14 Gentiles, I glorify my ministry ; if by any means I may provoke to rivalry 15 my flesh, and savesome of them. For if the casting away of them is the recon- ciling of the world, what shall the re- ceiving of them be, but life from the 16 dead? And if the first-fruit is holy, so is the mass ; and if the root is holy, so X Ver. 11, 12. y Num. 15 : 18-21. making the most of it, and exerting myself to the utmost for its succes.s, thereby moving my kindred to emula- tion (ver. 14), He hoped through the Gentiles to reach the Jews, and that the prosperity of the work among the former would arouse the latter to atten- tion and inquiry, 14, If by any means I may pro- voke to emulation, or rivalry (the same word as used in ver. 11) my flesh, my kindred, and might save some of them, implying that he did not expect to save a large number of them through his own ministry. The}" were mostly too prejudiced against him. too blinded to see the truth, and too self-righteous to feel their needof a Sav- iour (2 Cor. 3 : 15, 16). But the saving of some was worthy of the highest efforts of his ministry (i Cor. 9 : 22). He would overcome prejudices on the part of both Jew and Gentile, and break down the middle wall of partition that separated them and make them one in Christ (Gal. 3: 28; Eph. 2 : 14-lS). Ill tllCSC SOme hc saw a pledge and lirst-fruits of the com- ing glorious harvest. 15. Returning from the digression in the last two verses the apostle passes to the topic of ver. 11, 12. For — con- firms what he had already said and introduces a reason for his deep interest in tlie salvation of Israel. If the castin^r away of them, a different word from tliat used in ver. 1, 2, with a different reference. It is opposed to " tlio receiving of them," and implies that tlie casting away was not final, and that it was to be followed by a restora- tion. Be, proves to be, the occasion of reconciling the Avorld, the Gen- tiles composing the main part of the world. Tlie circumstances attending tlie casting away of Israel, their unbelief, the crucifixion of Christ and their rejec- tion of the gospel, resulted in provid- ing the world's reconciliation and in the enjoyment of it by the vast com- pany of Gentile believers (Eph. 2 : 11-17). If this is so, Avhat shall the receiv- ing of them be but life from the dead, that is, like it in its effects upon others. Their reception into the king- dom will be attended with a revival of true religion so vast and wonderful that it will be like a translation from death to life. It will usher in the latter day glory. Some early and late expositors suppose life from the dead to mean the resurrection at the end of the world. But this is not the ordinary use of life in the New Testament. The connec- tion also appears to demand a reference to the spiritual blessings conferred upon the Gentiles through the Jews. These would be so worldwide and so glorious as to form a fitting climax to the recon- ciling of the world just spoken of. 16. The apostle has already implied the restoration of Israel, and that for its effects upon the world it would be desirable. He now treats it as probable in the nature of the case. For, rather. And, if the first fruit be holy, set apart, consecrated to God, the lump, or mass, is also holy. The first-fruit here means, not the first gathered fruit of the field in their natural state (Lev. 23 : lo), but a portiou of this when prepared for use, for example a cake of the dough first prepared (Num. 15:20). The oflering of this was an acknowl- edgment that tlie whole belonged right- fully to God, and was consecrated to him, and was to lie used and enjoyed as such. And this Paul uses to illustrate the restoration of Israel implied in the preceding verse, and as a reason for ex- pecting it. If the first-fruit is holy, if the first body of Jewish believers are holy, consecrated to God as they evi- dently are and constituting the true Is- rael (^'^r. 2), then we may look upon their consecration as in eftect implying tlie consecration of all, and their con- version as an earnest of the great spir- itual harvest and conversion of Israel. Ch. XI.] ROMANS 141 and if the root be holy, so are the branches. 17 And if some of the branches be broken off, »and thou, being a wild olive tree, wert graffed in among them, and with them partakest of the root 18 and fatness of the olive tree, boast not against the branches. But if thou boast, thou bearest not the root, but 17 are the branches. And if some of the branches were broken off, and thou, being a wild olive-branch, wast grafted in among them, and became a par- taker with them of the root of the fat- 18 ness of the olive-tree ; exult not over the branches But if thou gloriest, it is not thou that bearest the root, but z Eph. 2 : 11-13 ; 3 : 6. And so also in regard to the patriarchs who were consecrated and dear to God. If the root be holy, if the fathers of the nation were separated and conse- crated to peculiar privileges and bless- ings, so are the branches, so their descendants may be likewise regarded in the Divine purpose, and in the end may be expected to be so. Holy is used in the Old Testament sense of conse- cration, being set apart to God and to ■» his purposes. It was said of Israel, that they were holy to the Lord, implying that there ought to be an inward corre- sponding holiness, but not affirming or implying that this was actually the case. By this figure the apostle means that the branches sustain the same rela- tion as the root, that the fathers of Is- rael and their descendants both sustain the same peculiar relation to God, namely, consecrated to him as his pecu- liar people. Many suppose both " first- fruits" and "root" to refer to the fathers. But to me it seems more prob- able that the second emblem means something different from the first. It seems natural after implying the res- toration and conversion of Israel in ver. 15, to speak of the first converts, so aptly represented by "first-fruits," as an earnest of the conversion of all. And it was equally natural then to for- tify that argument by the fact that Is- rael had from the fathers downward been set apart to God as a peculiar people. 17. Paul continues to use the figure of root and branches to illustrate the true relation of Jewish and Gentile converts to each other, and to give words of caution to the latter. If some of the branches be broken off, that is, some of the Jews through their rejection of Christ. The branches not broken off would then of course represent those Jewish converts who were of the true Israel, and were occu- pying their original position in relation to the blessings to be received from the Messiah's kingdom. And thou, a Gentile, being a wild olive branch wert graifed {grafted) in among them that remained, and with them partakest of the root and fat- ness, that is, of the fatness of the root, participating in the blessing of the divine kingdom, etc. The wild olive must not be considered as barren. Its fruit is not so rich and abundant as that of the cultivated tree, and has a sharp acid taste. The grafting has refer- ence not to the common effects of graft- ing. It is " contrary to nature " (ver. 24) and the effects are inverted. It rather refers to a participation of blessing, and a community of privilege. The Gentile converts had by divine grace been transferred to a position they did not originally hold, and through Christ hg^ been made partakers of the divine kingdom and members of the true Is- rael. ( Comp. Eph. 2 : 11-13. ) 18. Continuation of the sentence. And since thou art a wild branch on an originally nobler stock. Boast not against the branches, or Glory not over the branches — over those broken off, the unbelieving Jews. But if thou art tempted to glory, remember that thou bearest not the root, but the root thee, that thou art not first in dignity and place, that the Jews had the priority in the divine arrange- ment and in the blessings pertaining to the Messiah and his kingdom. Com- pare "To the Jew first and also to the Greek " (i = le) ; our Lord's words, " Go not into a way of the Gentiles, . . . but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel " (Matt, lo : 5, 6) ; and Paul's words, "It was necessary that the word of God should first be spoken to you," etc. (.^ctsia :46). Notice that those broken ojf through unbelief though of the literal Israel were not of the true Israel (9 : 6). And also that believ- ing Gentiles were admitted as a part of 142 ROMANS [Ch. XI. 19 the root thee. Thou Avilt say then, The branches were broken off, » that I 20 might be graffed in. Well ; ^ because of unbelief they were broken off, and thou standest by faith. ^Be not high- 21 minded, but ^ fear : for if God •■ spared not the natural branches, take heed lest he also spare not thee. 22 Behold therefore the goodness and severity of God : on them which fell, severity ; but toward thee, goodness, fif thou continue in his goodness: otherwise sthou also shalt be cutoff. 2:5 And they also, ^ if they abide not in unbelief, shall be graffed in : for God 24 is able to graff them in again. For if 19 the root thee. Thou wilt say then, branches were broken off, that I might 20 be grafted in. Well ; by their unbe- lief they were broken off, and thou standest by thy belief. Be not high- 21 minded, but fear: for if God spared not the natural branches, neither will he spare thee. 22 Behold then God's kindness and se- verity ; toward those who fell, sever- ity ; but toward thee, God's kindness, if thou continue in his kindness ; other- wise, thou also shalt be cut off. And 23 they also, if they continue not in their unbelief, shall be grafted in ; for God is able to graft them in again. a Ver. 11, 12, 17. 5 Acts 13 : 46, 47. c 1 Cor. 4:7. d Prov. 28: U; Phil. 2 : 12. e Ver. 17, 19 ; 1 Cor. 10 : 1-12. / Heb. 3 : 14 ; 10 : 23, 38. g John 15 : 2. ft 2 Cor. 3 : 16. the true Israel (ver. 20), A distinction should be made between the theocracy which answers to Israel, as a people, under the government of God ; true Israel, answering to the divine king- dom, or kingdom of God ; and the church, the professed discipleship of Jesus, Of the latter Paul is not here speaking. 19. Thou wilt say then, or therefore, in order to meet my reasoning and suggest some ground at least for glorifying. Branches were broken off in order that I might be graffed {grafted) in, as though some prefer- ence were shown you over the Jew. The should be omitted. The pronoun I is emphatic, indicative of a boasting spirit. 20. Well, very good, I admit that there was a preference, but it was not on account of any personal merit in you, and is therefore no ground of boasting. Because of unbelief, or their disbelief, they were broken off, and thou standest by faith — rather, by thy faith, or belief. Thou standest in thy present relation as a branch grafted into the good olive. Paul is here viewing the human side merely. Be not high-minded, haughty, with a spirit of l)oasting, but fear, exercise a reverential and humble spirit, lest through sins and unbelief thou forfeit the blessings and privileges to wliich thou hast been raised. 21. For if God spared not the natural branches — those of literal Lsrael in distinction from those grafted in — take heed lest in any way he also spare not thee. According to the Greek text most generally approved, omit take heed lest, and translate, Neither will he spare thee, if thou fall into unbelief. There is indeed less rea- son to expect the forbearance of God toward the Gentiles who had thus been made partakers of blessings and privi- leges, if they misused them, than to- ward his own people who were beloved for their fathers' sake. 22. In view of what I have just said (ver. 20, 21), Behold therefore the goodness, the kindness (2:^)^ and severity of God , with the idea of stern sharpness and strictness. On them which fell, being broken oft' through unbelief, severity; but to- ward thee, grafted in among the branches of the olive, God's goodness if thou continue, or abide, by faith in that goodness — in that state into which his goodness has brought thee. Grace produces perseverance by nour- ishing and maintaining faith (1 Peter 1:5); it uses all gospel means, and among these means are warnings against apostasy ( Heb. 6:4-9; Jude 17-23 ) . otherwise, since in that case, if thou abide not in that goodness, thou also shalt be cut off. 23. The apostle again takes up the fitness and propriety of the restoration of Israel. And they also, the broken-ofF olive branches, the Jews, if they abide, or continue, not still in unbelief shall be graffed {grafted), as well as tlie branches from the wild olive tree. For God is able to graff {graft) them in again. Every Jewish convert was a witness of the truth of this statement. Paul is treating now with individual Jews and Gentiles, as branches grafted or re- Ch. XI.] ROMANS 143 thou wert cut out of the olive tree which is wild by nature, and wert graffed contrary to nature into a good olive tree : how much more shall these, which be the natural branches, be graffed into their own olive tree ! 25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own con- ceits, that i blindness in part is hap- pened to Israel, ^ until the fulness of 26 the Gentiles be come in. And so i all Israel shall be saved : as it is written, 24 For if thou wast cut out of that which is by nature a wild olive-tree and wast grafted contrary to nature into a good olive-tree ; how much more shall these, who are the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive-tree ? 25 For I do not wish you, brethren, to be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye be wise in your own conceits, that hard- ness has come upon Israel in part, until the fullness of the Gentiles come 26 in. And so all Israel will be saved ; i 2 Cor. 3 : 14-16. k Luke 21 : 2i. I Isa. 45 : 17 ; Jer. 30 : 17-22. grafted through faith into the good olive tree. 24. For if thou • . . wild by nature. (see on ver. 17.) W c r t graffed {grafted) contrary to na- ture into a good olive tree. The superior is generally grafted into the inferior stock. But here the case is re- versed ; the poorer is grafted into the better, with excellent results. "The wild olive tree, whose fruit is larger and more meaty, but whose oil is less valuable and used only for ointments, has the curious quality that, when grafted on a cultivated tree it bears ex- cellent fruit, which is just the reverse of the general effect of grafting " (Schaff-Herzog). How much more shall these that he the natural branches, the unbelieving Jews, be graffed {grafted) into their own olive tree, which is theirs by nature. Israel was God's peculiar peo- ple, distinguished for ages by tokens of his regard, and still beloved for the fathers' sake. But Gentiles who had no such titles and tokens of his favor have obtained it ; much more may Jews regain it. The restoration of Israel is a more probable event, judging from God's dealings in the past, than was the introduction of Gentiles into the true Israel. 25-32. The eestoration of Is- rael ACCORDING TO GOD'S WORD AND PURPOSES. The ultimate gathering in of Jews and Gentiles. 25. Leaving the figure of the olive tree, Paul now speaks in plain lan- guage, and enlarges upon a great future restoration. For, confirmatory of the brighter future suggested by ver. 24, I would not, / do not wish yon, breth- ren, to be ignorant, a common way with Paul in calling attention to some- thing important ( l : is ; l Cor. lO : l ; 12 : l ; 2 Cor. 1 : 8 ; 1 Thess. 4 : 13) , of thiS Uiy StCry , according to New Testament usage, a secret or hidden thing of God, not gen- erally understood, and generally known only by revelation (i Cor. is : 51 ; comp. Rom. 16 : 25 ; 1 Cor. 4:1). Why he wislicd them to know this mystery : Lest ye should be Avise, or in order that ye may not be wise, in your own conceits — in your own estimation, and think too highly of yourselves be- cause of the preference given you. He would check pride in Gentile Christians. They must not be wise above, or con- trary, to what was written, nor suppose they understood better than Jews the plans of God's grace. The mystery was, That blindness — rather, hardness (ver. 7), in part is happened, or come upon, Israel, a large part of the na- tion, some in every age having accepted Christ, until the fulness, the full number, the multitudes, of the Gen- tiles be come in, or (omitting be), come in to the Messiah's kingdom and the enjoyment of his salvation, (comp. Rev. 7:9.) See vcr. 15, where it is inti- mated that the conversion of Israel would result in great crowning spiritual blessings to the world, which necessar- ily includes the Gentiles. So it is not necessary to explain this verse to mean the entire gathering of the Gentiles into the kingdom before the restoration of Israel. 26. And so, or thiis, in the arrange- ment of God's grace, the hardness of Israel having ended with the coming in of the fullness of the Gentiles, all Is- rael as a people shall be saved through faith in Christ (ver. 23). It is most natural to refer this to the ftiture, and to literal, rather than spiritual, Is- rael, when the great body of Israel 144 ROMANS [Ch. XI. There shall come out of 8ion the De- liverer, and shall turn away ungodll- 27 ness from Jacob : '" for this is my cove- nant unto them, " when I shall take 28 away their sins. As concerning the gospel, they are enemies for your sakes : but as touching the election, they are 29 "beloved for the fathers' sakes. P'or the gifts and calling of God are Pwith- "0 out repentance. For as ye ■ through their 31 unbelief ; even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy 32 they also may obtain mercy. For ^ God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all. 30 For just as ye in times past disobeyed God, but have now obtained mercy by 31 their disobedience ; so have these also now disobeyed, that by the mercy shown to you they also may now ob- 32 tain mercy. For God shut up all unto disobedience, that he might have mercy on all. r Ver. 11-19. s3 : 9; Gal. 3 : 22. within the purposes of Divine love (Num. 25 : 19; 1 Sam. 15 : 29 ; Phil. 1:6; Heb. 13 : 8 ; 2 Tim. 2 : 13). 30, 31. In these verses the apostle illustrates and confirms the statement of ver. 29. For as ye — Gentiles — in times past have not believed, omit have and translate, disobeyed God. (comp. 1 : 18-32.) Yet havc now obtained mercy through their unbelief, their disobedience, that is, of Israel — the Jews. Through this dis- obedience Christ was crucified and be- came a propitiation for our sins, and it became also the occasion of preaching the gospel to the Gentiles. So have these — Israel, the Jews — also now not believed, or )iow disobeyed, that through your mercy, better, that through mercy shown to yoic by God in the gospel they also may obtain mercy, being influenced thereby and excited to emulation. ( see on ver. u, is. ) The emphatic idea in these two verses is mercy. Jewish unbelief and conse- quent disobedience was the occasion of mercy to the Gentiles ; and this mercy to the Gentiles will be the occasion of, and will result in, the Jews obtaining mercy. Thus the seeming rejection of Israel will be only for a time, and God's immutable purposes of mercy toward them will ultimately have a fulfillment. 33. The Divine plan in a nutshell ; consummated in the world's redemp- tion. For God shut up all, Jews and Gentiles, in unbelief, or disobedience, the Gentiles in the past, the Jews at present, that he might have mercy on all, in bringing the multitude.s of both Gentiles and Jews ultimately into his kingdom. Concluded, or shut up, so as to be helpless — without means of escape. (Comp. G.i1. 3:22; Rom. 3 : 19.) All are indeed put on the same footing — that of mercy — and for all mercy is pro- vided, and offered to all, on condition of acceptance by faith. But this does not appear to have been all that was in the apostle's mind, which drew forth his acclamation of praise. He saw, in the future Israel's restoration and con- version, with the Gentile fullness, bringing the whole world to Christ. He beheld God's plan in treating both Jews and Gentiles alike, with like glo- rious results, when the whole race liv- ing at the time would be redeemed to God. Surely such a view was enough to call forth his highest admiration and his unspeakable praise. Israel's Restoration. There ap- pear to be unfulfilled prophecies con- cerning Judah and Israel, such as Joel 3 : 1-21 ; Amos 9 : 8-15. Paul saw the fulfillment of such prophecies in the conversion and restoration of Israel. Much has been written upon this subject, some spiritualizing these prophecies, and others taking them with extreme literalness. Perhaps their true and in- tended meaning lies between the two. There never has been a time since apos- tolic days when there was so much to indicate their near fulfillment as now. A wonderful awakening is going on among the Jewish people, a national and a spiritual. This extends to all parts of the world. There is the Zion- ist movement toward spiritual truth and the Promised Land. Already there are said to be twenty-nine Jewish colonies in Palestine, and it is estimated that there are not less than one hun- dred thousand Jews there. And the Anglo-Saxon race — whether we regard it as more largely representing spirit- ual Israel than any other, or, with some, as the actual continuance of the ten lost tribes of Israel — this race is the great propagator of Christian- ity, the great Christian missionary race of the world. The conversion of the Israelitish people will be the climax of triumphant Christianity, and will add a stimulus and force to missionary enterprises unprecedented in history. In regard to the Jew and Christianity, it may be added, that it K 146 ROMANS [Ch. XI. 33 O the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and knowledge of God ! ' How uusearehablu are his judgments, and 34 his ways past finding out ! " For who hath known the mind of the Lord? Or who hath been his counsellor? 35 Or ^ who hath first given to him, and it shall be recomijensed unto him again? 36 For y of him, and through him, and to o3 Oh, the depth of the riches, both of the wisdom and the knowledge of God ! How unsearchable are his judgments, 34 and his ways past tracing out ! For, Who knew the mind of the Lord ? Or who became his counselor? 35 Or who first gave to him, and it shall 36 be given back to him agr.in ? For from him, and through him, and for t Ps. 36 : 6 ; 92 : 5. M Job 15 ; 8 ; 1 Cor. 2 : 16. x Job 35 : 7 ; 11 : 11. 1 Chron. 29 : 11, 12; Col. 1 : 16. should not be demanded that he render himself less a Jew, but that he accept Jesus as his Messiah, the promised One of Israel. This is plainly in har- mony with the fifteenth chapter of tlie Acts. 33-35. Exclamations of won- der AT THIS SUBLIME MYSTERY, AND ASCRIPTIONS OF PRAISE TO THE Author and Ruler of all. This naturally concludes the discussion in the ninth, tenth, and eleventh chapters. It is also a fitting conclusion to the whole doctrinal discussion of. tlie Epis- tle which ends here. Compare the ex- ultant endings of chapters seven and eight. 33. With this lofty and wide range of view of God's mysterious plan in- volving the glorious results of redemp- tion, the apostle gives vent to his emotions in expression of adniirati