LIBRARY f>r .^RifTFTON THEOLOGICAL S£,VM,-.nAY .m. ..^..j BX9620 .F38 1847 Faure, P. E , Waarheid : ( detail of some proceedings of the consistory < and minister of the Dutch Reformed Church Be WAARHEIP. DETAIL OF SOME PROCEEDINGS OF THE CONSISTORY AND MINISTER OF THE DUTCH REFORMED CHURCH AT WYNBERG. By the Reverend P. E. Faure, V.D.M. Let all things be done decently and in order. — 1 Cor. xiv. 40. WITH AN APPENDIX CONTAINING A FCW REMARKS BIT THE SAME '' ON THE "WYNBERG MISSION," OR «DE ECHTB WAARHEID." €avt Coton : Printed by B. J. van de Sandt de Villiers, No. 2, Castle-street:— and Published by Messrs. A. S. Robertson, Heerengracht, J. H. CoLLARD, Long-market-street, and F. W. van pe r Vliet. Bree-street. ^0-^f?mCETO;f 1847. /\^ .0^ ■.■ 20W TO THE MEMBERS OF THE WYNBERG CHURCH IN PARTI- CULAR, AND TO ALL CHRISTIANS IN GENERAL. ' Beloved ! One of the most important situations in which man can be placed upon earth, is that of Pastor, or Minister, promotor of the spiritual interests of his fellow-creatures, instructor of the ignorant in those truths which alone can make wise unto salvation ; in the hand of God the guide of his fellow mortals to a better life. In order to be successful in the exercise of these im- portant duties, it is required to have a fit disposition for the work, which ought to be carefully developed, — that he be full of the love of God, in Jesus Christ, and feels an interest in the welfare of his fellow-creatures ; that he diligently applies himself to the acquirement of that knowledge and those sciences, which enable him not only to instruct the ignorant, but to refute op- ponents, — and more particularly, that such knowledge be sanctified to his heart by the Holy Spirit, and in- fluences his conduct so, that he instructs by walk and conversation, — and finally, that the blessing of God crowns his work. It is under this conviction that the Dutch Reformed Church in Southern Africa has, in accordance with the most of the established Churches in the world, framed Regulations for the training up and admission of those who desire to exercise the oflice of Pastor or Minister, or of Public Religious Instructor. It would appear, however, that of late more than one member of our Church, has viewed the matter in a different light to what their Ministers, imploring the light of the Holy Ghost, have thought proper to fix and determine, with the view to comply with the rule of the apostle Paul, who, in regard to the manner in which every thing ought to be regulated in the Church of Christ, gave no other precept than this : Let all things be done decently and in order. This was latterly evinced by more than one member of our Church, by arbitrarily breaking through those 2 rules, (contrary to solemn and openly confessed vows, which in many Churches are also corroborated by sub- scribing to the same, on being confirmed and admitted as members of the Church,) by taking upon themselves the right openly to act as Teachers, without any due admission, thereby showing disrespect for the regu- lations of the Synod, and indifference as to the pledges on the ground of which membership of the Church was granted to them. This could not but be grievous to the Ministers and Elders of the Church, not only on account of the bad example thereby given to others to break through the rules, which were made in the fear of God, for the benefit of the Church; but more particularly, because it proved, that they who pretend to be actuated by a desire for the glory of God, had no respect for the ad- monitions of the apostles: Hebr. xiii. 17. Ohey the7n that hav0 the rule over you, and submit yourselves : for they loatch for your souls, as they that must give account, that they may do it with joy, and not luith grief : for that is unprofitable for you. 1 Thess. v. 12, 13. And we beseech you, brethren, to knoiv them ivhich labour among you, and are over you in the Lord, and admonish you : And to esteem them very highly in love for their works' sake. If such proceedings were in themselves unpleasant and to be regretted, they became the more so by the encouragement which such transgressors deceived from Christians and Ministers, belonging to other congregations, — from men to whom Ave should so willingly have extended the hand of brotherhood, — who not only attached their approbation to such members of our Church, who had upon their own authority assumed the right to act as Teachers, but some of them were even found the ready friends to induct them in the sacred ministry, by the laying on of hands; and should any Minister of the Reformed Church ven- ture to complain about the breach of good order there- by occasioned in his parish, — should he presume to re- mark, as it happened to me, that he did not approve of the preaching of lay-members of the congregation, before they had been previously admitted thereto by the Presbytery, — he was sure to be rewarded by being held out, as well in private as in open assemblies, an enemy to the good cause. This state of things, beloved Christians, has urged me to develope to you, that, which has latterly happened in my congregation, for two reasons. First, — Because you should he in jTm/Z possession of that which j^ou might otherwise only hear in part. Second, — Because the responsible situation which I fill renders it a duty, as much as possible to guard for my good name, because a Minister whose name is polluted, more particularly by an accusation of being an enemy to the good cause, the cause of God and Christ, is unworthy of his office, especially as I am convinced that a perverted representation of facts has, with some even pious people, made an injurious im- pression with regard to myself, and that even, had it not been the care of the Most High, who averted it, many members of the congregation who formerly had always shewn a great attachment to me, would thereby have been severed from our community, whilst they now, after a while of indifference, again show me that love which the word of God demands from them, for my work's sake. I at first supposed that it would be sufficient for me in order to make you acquainted with the case, merely to lay before you a correspondence between the Revd. Dr. Adamson and myself; but I find that such would not put you in possession of the whole case, because there are some who consider that I have acted foolish- ly, whilst I continued for so long a time a member of the Committee of the Christian Instruction Society , — in not opposing myself to the preaching of lay-mem- bers ; the reader will therefore require to be put in pos- session of what took place between myself and the Christian Instruction Society of Wynberg and Ronde- boscli. In the year 184], I was invited to aid in the forma- tion of a Society, having for its object to employ one or more Agents to visit the dwellings of those who ne- glected themselves, who never visited any place of religious worship. I signified my approval of the plan, promised all my help and advice to the Society, but requested to be excused from becoming a member, — because I would not be able to assist regularly in per- forming the duties, and because I had not much leisure in tlie sphere in which I was placed. I was, however. persuaded, particularly by the argument that it would serve to widen my sphere of usefulness : that there was an abundance of means of grace at Wynberg, but which many, very many, neglected to make use of. In this manner I was persuaded to take a share in the labours of the Society, as much as my leisure per- mitted. Every thing went on well, as long as the So- ciety confined itself faithfully to the original plan ; but it will appear from the following correspondence, that it soon took another turn, namely — the Agents who had in the meetings of the Directors often been admo- nished that they were merely to be scriptural readers, soon transformed themselves into expounders of the Scriptures, preachers, &c. On several occasions, different opinions were express- ed on the subject in the meetings, mostly disapproving of the Agents conducting public worship ; this was par- ticula]-ly the case when the Ministers of the Anglican Church, the Rev, Messrs. Fannell and Hutton, were members of the Committee : but after the departure of these Gentlemen, a spirit prevailed in favor of the holding of such worship, so that, when in October 1845 I received a note from Mr. Read, Secretary of the Committee, requesting to know whether it was my de- sire to remain a member of the Committee for another year, I felt it my duty to return the following answer : Waterloo, 20th October 1845. My Christian Friends! In reply to a note from your Secretary, requesting to know, if it was my desire to remain for another year on the Committee of the Christian Instruction Society, it is with much regret I feel myself called upon to address to you this present communication, requesting to have ray name withdrawn as a member of the Committee of your Society. I would most gladly have continued a member of the same, and have lent my humble aid in its operations, as much as was in my power, but the late proceedings have compelled me, after mature con- sideration, to come to this painful resolution, which I should have been most anxious to have avoided. It is but just that I should candidly state to you the considerations which have moved me in this matter. Far be it that any thing of a sectarian nature should in the least have influenced my mind in coming to this resolution, but the principle which was formally acknowledged at the formation of the Christian In- struction Society, and on which I joined your Society, having, in my view, been departed from, I will in candour state llic difliculties in wliich I shall consequently be involved, in case I continue my connection with the society on the principle, on which yon are acting at present. When the Christian Instruction Society was originally esta- blished, it was intended to carry on its operations by means of Agents, who were to act as Cathechists and Scripture Readers, This was inculcated on the Agents, and on their departing from that principle, it was resolved to enforce the rules for that pur- pose laid down. When the Committee afterwards considered it necessary that their Agents should act as Preachers, I then stated, that although it was a deviation from the original principle, I would not object to the same, provided the Agents, of tvhutever deno- mination, should be regularly examined and admitted as such according to the rules and regulations of that Church of which they are members ; as by the latest Regulations of the Dutch Reformed Church, I could not sanction the preaching of laymen, unless previously licenced by the proper Church Court. I beg to repeat that I am favorable to laymen holding religious meetings ; the Dutch Reformed Church also encourages its members, often to meet for mutual edification by prayer and scriptural reading, and has no prescribed rules for the same, — but as the word of God declares, " that all things must be done decently atid in order," (1 Cor. xiv. 40.) the Church has pre- scribed, that all laymen, desirous of acting as Preachers, shall be properly admitted as such. It declares concerning them, Art. .58 : " That they should have been resident in the congregation at least two years ; that they have conducted themselves in an irreproachable and exemplary manner, and have at least for two years been exercising and preparing themselves expressly for giving religious instruction, under the efficient training and superintendence of some Minister or other of their community." And regarding their admission, it is ordered, Art. 59 : " That such Instructors, Cathechists, or Lay Preachers, shall, for the said purpose, on the recommendation of the properly qualified Church Court, within whose bounds they are, undergo a suitable examination by the Presbytery, in Sacred History, the contents of the Books of Scripture, the doctrines of the Christian Faith and Morality, and the principal points of Church History. Trial shall also be made as to their talent for instructing. It enjoins on all its Ministers, " that they shall properly assist and train such as wish to qualify themselves for giving religious instruction as subordinate instructors." — Art. 66. In the act of admission it is enjoined on the Lay Preachers, " that they guard against all expressions and statements, which might give rise to party feeling and division in the community, and on the other hand, that they exert themselves to preserve the bond of affection and be careful not to cast reflections upon government or its administration, or upon the Minister and his doctrine and ministration ; that so far from drawing people away from attendance at public worship, performed in and 6 amongst their congregations, they vviil, on the contrary, both by their precept and example, recommend the observance thereof, and will consequently never hold a Meeting during the hours of public worship, or so as to interfere in any manner with the same." At the annual investigation of the Presbytery, the consistory is bound to answer, "whether these injunctions are observed in the congregation, and uo unlicenced Preachers are allowed to officiate." These, my Christian Friends, are the regulations of the Dutch Reformed Church,* and considering that members of the Dutch Reformed Church have been appointed by you as Preachers, contrary to the rules of the church, that is, without passing an examination, and contrary to the promise they publicly made on their being admitted communicants of that church, " that they will subject themselves to the spiritual superintendence of the Overseers of that Church, — I cannot conscientiously support such proceedings, without being guilty of duplicity. Messrs. Keet and Le Riche, being both members of the Church of which I am the Pastor, I am glad that they are em- ployed as Agents of your Society, as the Society was originally constituted ; neither can I have the least objection to their being your Agents, in the capacity of Preachers, provided they are admitted as such according to the rules of the Church of which they are members,- — in which case I am most ready, as I have repeatedly declared, of rendering them every assistance to have that object attained, and continue to assist the Society in its benevolent endeavours, without any regard whom they era- ploy as their vVgents, if properly authorized, for I disclaim all " sectarianism." Should this meet with any consideration, my request will fall of itself: but should the Committee think otherwise and appoint Preachers, without any regard to their being qualified to act as such, I must state my regret, that I shall have to deny myself the gratification of meeting you any longer as a mermber of the Christian Instruction Society. Believe me. My Christian Friends, Yours verv truly, P. E. FAURE. The Committee of the Christian Instruction Society of Wynherg and Rondebosch. * And are not these salutary regulations ? Does a State allow that every one appropriates to himself a self-assumed authority to appear before a Court and act the Barrister ? that every one passes liimself off as a Surgeon, or Doctor of Medicine ? And shall the Church permit, that every one take upon liimself the Office of Propagator of the word of God and Expounder of the Holy Scriptures .' Ought then a Church to be reproved for institutmg such i-egulations, and it be thrown uncharitably into their face, that these regulations only serve to lay obstructions in the way of those who so much desire to promote the honor of God ! Is it just, that, for that reason, the Dutch Reformed Church is said to be against Missionary labor. To this letter I received the following reply in the name of the Committee of the said Society, emanating from the pen of Mr. Hawkins, already well known through the South African Press. Wynberg, Dec. 8tli, 1845. Reverend and Dear Sir, Having laid before the Committee of the Wynberg and Rondebosch Christian Instruction Society, your letter of the 20th October last, I have received their instruction to communi- cate to you the following- observations in reply. Your letter appears to the Committee to involve a threefold charge against their pooceedings. First. — ^A departure from tlie original constitution of the Society. Second. — A departure in the appointment of what you term " Preachers," from the rules of the Church of which those per- sons are members. Third.— The appointment of such " Preachers without any regard being had as to their being properly qualified to act as such." The departure from the original constitution of the Society alluded to in your letter, arises out of the fact that the Agents of the Society are permitted to hold meetings for prayer and christian instruction. The Committee desire me to observe that the 2nd Resolution adopted at the original establishment of the Society on the 11th May 1841, expressly states this as one of the means contemplated for carrying out the objects of the Institution. The first Candidate offered himself as an Agent to the Society was a Mr. ; and on the 8th June 1841, the following Resolution among others, was adopted. " Resolved that the Secretary prepare draft of a letter of in- structions for the eventual guidance of Mr. , if engaged, and adverting to his youth and inexperience, such portion of the objects of the Society contained in the 2nd Resolution of the proceedings of the 11th May last, which refers to meetings for prayer and christian instruction, shall not be included in these instructions." This Resolution distinctly* shews that the found- ers of the Institution considered the means which you now declare to be unconstitutional, to have been within its constitu- tion ; but for special reasons, withheld them from the instruc- tions proposed to be issued to Mr. , who ultimately was not engaged by the Society. The first Agent employed by the Society was Mr. Keet. He was engaged at the meeting of the Committee held on the 11th August 1841, the first of their meetings at which, according to the minutes, you were present. The instructions issued to Mr, Keet were to the same effect as those proposed for issue to Mr. r-. * Distinctly ? ! 8 At a meeting of the Comiuittee held on the 9th March 1842, Mr. Keet pointed out the practical inconvenience of the rule in his instructions respecting the holdingof prayer meetings, &c. It was unanimously resolved " that the restriction in tne Agents' instructions as to the holding of meetings for prayer, and the collecting together of persons for religious instruction, be rescinded; and that the 2nd Resolution of the Society of the 11th May last be in future fully observed and carried out ;" the terra " in future" evidently implying that it should be observed, provided that the Society had Agents of mature age and ex- perience. Up to this point there appears to have been no doubt in the minds of the Committee as to the perfectly constitutional use of these means. On the 10th May 1843, Mr. Keet addressed a letter to the Committee, suggesting the purchase of a large piece of ground, at Noordhoek, the establishment of a village, and the formation of a settlement in connection with the Society, to be placed under his care, in respect to the religious instruction of the in- habitants. This letter was, on the 7th June 1843, referred for report to a Sub-committee, consisting of the following gentle- men : Rev. P. Faure, and Messrs. Casamajor, Eksteen, Kotze, and Steedman. The report of the Sub-committee, dated the 13th June 1843, in your own handwriting, is to the following efiFect: " Agreed to report to the General Committee, that the Sub- committee are of opinion, that a settlement of the kind proposed in Mr. Keet's letter, was not contemplated by the fundamental rules of the Society, and even appears contrary to the provision of the 2d rule, " that it should be the duty of the Society's Agent, to stimulate those whom he visits to a regular attendance upon the preaching of the gospel, by which expression your Committee has no doubt, was intended the preaching at the established places of worship." This report involves a fact, and a reason for that fact.* As to the fact, that such a settlement was not contemplated by the fundamental rules of the Society, there cannot be a doubt. It may well be doubted, however, whether the whole of the sub- scribers to the report concurred in the reason,^ to the extent that the holding of meetings for prayer and Christian instruction, is incompatible with the fundamental rules of the Society. Three of the gentlemen who subscribed the report, were present at the meeting of the 9th March 1842, which removed every restriction to the holding of such meetings, and concurred in its pro- ceedings. The Committee at their meeting of the 15th June 1843, did not, in as many words adopt the report, but merely resolved, " that in the opinion of this meeting, the subject of any proposed establishment at Noordhoek be finally withdrawn from the notice of the Society, as incompatible with its avowed object." Not a word was recorded about the meetings for * We request the reader to pay attention to the reasoning. t Is there any ground for this doubt ! I declare that no one of the sub- scribers has given vent to the least appearance of doubt, at the framing of the report. prayer and Christian instruction.* It then appears, that for upwards of two years from the date of its original formation, the founders and conductors of the Society never doubted their constitutional competenc}' to authorize their agents to hold such meetings, and that, for the greater portion of this time, sucli meetings were actually held. Nor does there appear to have been any alteration in the constitution of the Society, at any subsequent period. In August 1843, the rules of the Society were revised, and agreeably to them, tlie Agents were to be instructed, that they were not to hold meetings, "without the approval of the Committee." This was, in fact, nothing more than a repetition, in other words, of the existing practice. f It is clear, that the conditional clause in the rules is declaratory of the competency of the Committee, to grant permission to hold the meetings to which you object. On the 1 1th September 1843, the Committee directed the Agent to discontinue the meetings held by him; and in their meeting of December 1844,1 they granted permission to him to revive them. Thus the cotistitntion of the Society never has been changed, though there have been changes in the practical enforcement of some of its rules. The Committee trust they have made it clear, that you are in error in charging them with any departure from the original princi- ples of the Society, in permitting their Agents to hold meetings for prayer and Christian instruction ; and that the principle, in consequence of the recognition of which you have now seceded, has been a recognized principle of the Society, during the four years and upwards, that you have been a member of its Committee. As to your second charge, the Committee desire me to state, that they must be guided by their own rules, and not by those of any particular section of the professing Church of Christ. To submit to the terms you propose would be virtually tantamount to the Committee placing itself, quoad the employment of some of its Agents, in subjection to the ecclesiastical courts of the Dutch Reformed Church. In regard to the third charge you have urged against the Com- mittee, I am also instructed to say, that they must take the measures which their rules prescribe, for ascertaining the quali- fication of their Agents. With reference to one of th^m, who has been the longest in the employ of the society, the Committee desired me to furnish you with the annexed extract of a letter from the Rev. Dr. Robertson, of Sweilendam, the moderator of * Reader ! you here jireceive that Mr. Hawkins wants to argue from silence, that the Committee did not agree with it ; while we have the cus - torn to be sUent when we agree, and to have our vote noted down when we have a different opinion. t Wherefore that repetition ? Was there no other reason for it than a mere inclination to repeat .' i That is, for 15 months. 10 the Synod of the Dutch Reformed Church, written shortly before the date of the engagement entered into with Mr. Keet.* I am, Revd. and dear Sir, Yours faithfully, T. HAWKINS, To Sec. to the W. & R. Chr. The Rev. P. E. Faure, Instr. Sty. The reader who has paid any attention to my letter of the 20th October, will readily perceive, how unsatis- factory this last letter must have been in every respect, written as it was by a man, who had on more than one occasion proved, that, looking on others as if they were erring, he considered himself in the right way, and writing in the name of a Committee, the members of which so often changed by the continual arrival and departure of Indian visitors, that it is not to be won- dered, that a deviation from the original plan had taken place, without themselves being aware or sen- sible of it. I thought it my duty, however, not to leave this letter unanswered, and thereupon wrote the following reply : Waterloo, 2d January 1846. Dear Sir, I am sorry to observe from the tenor of your letter of the 8th of December 1845, that an interpretation has been given to the contents of my previous letter, which was not intended by me. You state that my letter appears to the Committee, to involve a threefold charge against their proceedings, which you have taken the trouble to refute; but I must confess, that your statements have not in the least convinced me, that I am in error with regard to the grounds which would compel me to seoede as a member from the Committee. Having been con- nected with the society, almost from its very commencement, — remembering yet several debates with regard to its constitution, — remembering the speechesf of several members of the Com- mittee at puUk general meetings, explaining the nature and method of the Society's operations, and the duties required from its Agents,— remembering public declarations that it was in no way the Society's intention to draw people away from the established places for public divine worship, but, on the con- trary, to stir them to a regular attendance upon the preaching of the gospel, upon the means of grace, which the Committee * 1 am not at liberty to send this extract to press, because Dr. Robertson told me, that it was an extract from a private letter , written to a private individual. t Among whi£h chiefly that of the Rev. Mr. Haddy, in the Infant School Building at Wynberg. 11 declared to be abundant, especially at Wynberg,* — considering the present operations of the Society's Agents, — referring to the printed regulations for the school at Hout Bay, viz : No. 2, " That the Society's Agent shall, once in a month, on a Sab- bath, visit the above mentioned place, and there hold public divine worship in the school-house ;" — No. 10, " that besides the regular divine worship on Sunday mornings at 10 o'clock ; he shall also ou that day hold a religious meeting in the evening or afternoon ;" [N.B. In this article a distinction is made between public divine worship and a religious nieeti7ig^— and comparing all this with the 2d resolution, which speaks only of meeting.s for prayer and Christian instruction, and which was more than once verbally explained to the Agents, (who complained, that they could not prevent, when praying or reading with one family, that members of a neighbouring family came in,) that the Committee saw no objection to allow two or three families to join in that way, — there rests no doubt on my mind, that the changes of the Society have been such, that ihey mu.st be con- sidered a change in its constitution. I most positively stated in my communication, that I disclaim all sectarianism; how then could I propose terms which would virtually place the Committee itself in subjection to the Ecclesi- astical Courts of the Dutch Reformed Church, as you declare my terms involve? This would do it just as much as the em- ployment of an office-bearer of the Wesleyan body,f as one of the Agents of the Society, places it under the superintendence and jurisdiction of the Wesleyan Section of the Christian Church. I never spoke of the qualifications of your Agents, but of their being authorised to act as such, i. e. as preachers of the gospel. With regard to the extract of a letter from the Rev. Dr. Robertson of Svvellendam, allow me to observe that I am per- fectly convinced, that my reverend friend did not give his opinion in his capacity of Moderator of the Synod of the Dutch Reformed Church, so that the addition of that title to his name, rather weakens than strengthens your authority, as the opinion given in such a capacity would make the non-observance of the regulations of our church, which every minister is in duty bound to obey the more obvious. Moreover this testimony to Mr. Keet's qualification was not necessary for me, from whom the Committee on several occasions has had the most favorable opinions with regard to Mr. Keet, of which use has been made by the Committee, in the public prints. In the way the Committee is now carrying on the operations of the Society, I take the liberty to request, that no endeavours may ever be made to make those people who are members of the Church, over which the Lord has constituted me the Pastor, to discontinue their attendance on the instituted ordinances of * How consistent, therefore, to have an Agent, who, at the same time that public worship is held by me and others, regularly jureacAe* two or three times a week, at some 7 or 800 yards' distance. t At that time, namely, the Society employed an itinerating Preacher of the Wesleyan body. 12 religion aduiitjistcred by me. Let tliis, however, not be con- strued as another charge against the Society ; I merely wish to direct your attention to this point, if possible to prevent those consequences, which I wish to avoid, whilst endeavouring to do what my hands find to do, in the spreading of the savour of the knowledge of Jesus Christ, I keep in viev/ the unity of the Spirit in the bonds of love. T remain dear Sir, Yours faithfully, P. E. FAURE, v.D.M. J. Hawkins, Esq. Secretary &c. Should any one perhaps, after the perusal of the foregoing, imagine that there existed any difficulty for the Committee of the Christian Instruction Society, to disprove the grounds for my opinion and proceedings, he would but deceive himself, — for nothing was easier for them, and how well founded Ci) they have done it, and with what a high degree of discretion (?) and with what observance of the love to which a Minister is en- titled for his work's sake, will clearly appear from the following letter. Wynberg, 1.5th January 1846. Reverend and dear Sir, The Committee of the Wynberg and Rondebosch Chris- tian Instruction Society, request me to state, in reply to your communication of the 2nd instant, that the further continuance of the correspondence in regard to the points mooted in your letter of the 20th October last, is not likely in their opinion, to be attended with any satisfactory result, and accordingly, without intending the slightest disrespect to you, they limit themselves on those points to this acknowledgement of your letter. One subject, however, requires notice. It is obvious from the general tenor of your present communication, and especially from its concluding paragraph, that you apprehend the Com- mittee may make or allow to be made, endeavours to draw away members of churches from the established places of public worship. They instruct me to say, that they are anxious to carry out the principles and regulations of the Society in this, as in every other respect ; and that they are led to believe that the labors of their Agents have never been accompanied by en- deavours such as those to which you have considered it nec^s- sary to direct their attention. I have the honor to be, Reverend and dear Sir, Yours most faithfully, D. CUNLIFFE, To Sec. Ch. Ins. Sty. Rev. P. E. Faure, &c. &c. &c. 13 And in this manner those L2;entlemen dismissed the case, — with satisfaction, no doubt, at the manly and polite step they had taken. It was customary at the time when I belonged to the Coniiiiittee, to remind the Agent,. at stated })criods, '' Owe no man any thing." Had my friends, whilst reading this moral to their Agent, applied to themselves what the apostle Paul adds to it, (Rom. xiii. 8) "but to love one another," — if they had in view this rule, when they directed the otherwise so very civil Mr, Cunliffe to answer my letter, — I doubt not, I would have received one, written in quite a different spirit. But, let this suffice. My heart does not condemn me. I will only add, it was not with- out regret, that I was obliged to take leave of a Society, (which I had joined from the purest motives, and which had originally been so well calculated to be eminently useful,) so completely altered and under such circum- stances. Under these circumstances lay-preaching continued uninterrupted at more than one place. What I did in the matter, or rather, how much I have, for weighty reasons, withheld myself, in the face of the regulations of our Church, from acting against such preachers, the correspondence between the Rev. Dr. Adamson and myself will, I trust, fully show, and the reader will be himself convinced, whether the Society really meant and believed what it wrote in the last letter, as it caused an Agent to be ordained, for the purpose of forming an entirely new congregation, separated from the pre- viously existing Episcopalian, Wesleyan, and Reformed congregations. On the 2d September 1846, I received a letter from Dr. Adamson, dated Cape Town, 31st August 184G. Reverend and dear Sir, Mr. Keet, employed at present as Missionary by the Christian Instruction Society at Wynberg, has applied by let- ter to Mr. Stegmann and myself conjointly, requesting that he may be ordained by us to the spiritual charge of a congregation ; and assigning as a reason for this step, among others, that having applied to the Colonial Reformed Church, to be by them taken on trials for this purpose, he finds, that there is a regulation forming a portion of the present ecclesiastical law of that church, which prevents him from attaining his object. 14 Being a member of the Reformed Cliureh, Mr. Keel must necessarily consider it as having, in the first instance, a claim to his sevices, and a right to judge whether his qualifications can be rendered conducive to the cfl'ect and progress of the gospel under its direction and superintendence, and we, to whom he makes application, in the second instance, are inter- ested in knowing whether the objections to ordain him are merely constitutional, or whether there be any other obstacle than the internal regulations which the Church may have found it proper to enact for its own guidanee. I shall therefore feel greatly obliged to you, if you will have the kindness to inform me, — whether — First — The peculiar regulations of the Church are the sole ground in virtue of which the application of Mr. Keet has not been complied with — or whether — - Second — There be any objection on the score of conduct, demeanour, belief, or qualifications generally, which may stand in the way of his ordination. Be so good as to excuse ray applying to you in this instance, as being locally in charge of the interests of the Reformed Church in the district, and as having been, as I understand, the channel through which Mr. Keet has made his application. Believe mc dear Sir, Yours very truly, To JAMES ADAMSON, The Rev. Philip Faure, Wynberg. Dr. Adamson having thus frankly and kindly in- vited me to communicate information respecting Mr. Keet, I thought it proper to put that gentlemen in possession of all the particulars of the occurrences be- tween Mr. Keet, and the consistory of Wynberg and myself; and in order to make the evidence speak for itself, I have, as much as possible, supported my com- munication with another correspondence which had taken place. My answer was as follows : Waterloo, at Wynberg, Sept. 15, 1846. Rev. and dear Sir! Acknowledging the receipt of your letter dated 31st August 1846, I must apologise for an answer so late as this, having been prevented by a serious indisposition to do so at an earlier period. I must confess that I was not a little surprised, when I read the contents of your letter, informing me of Mr. Keet's written application to you and the Rev. Mr. Stegmann, requesting to be "ordained to the spiritual charge of a congregation, and as- 10 signing for a reason, ainongst others, that, having applied to the colonial Reformed Church, to be by them taken on trial for this purpose, lie finds that there is a regulation, formins? a portion of the present ecclesiastical law of that Chajch, which prevents him from attaining his object. How Mr. Keet can make such an assertion, I cannot conceive. I cannot presume, that he has exhibited to either yourself or the Rev. Mr. Stegmann, the correspondence he had with me on the subject; and as a query proposed by the consistory, in their letter to Mr. Keet, dated 11th May, still remains unanswered, it puzzles me, that he should apply tp you and one of his friends, by whom he Las been advised to address his letter to me. It has given me and others of my brethren of the Dutch Re- formed Church of late pain to observe, that some young mem- bers of our community have, contrary to their promise, when admitted as such, been licenced or commissioned to preach, by others than their avowed ecclesiastical superiors, which, should the same course be still pursued, must unavoidably lead to con- fusion and disunion ; but as we have both appended our names to the document forwarded to the Evangelical Alliance, and as you belong to a section of the Christian Church, in close com- munion with the Dutch Reformed Church, I do not hesitate to give you a full and impartial account of the transactions which have taken place between Mr. Keet and myself, leaving it to your own unbiassed judgment, to draw from the same an answer to the j^r** question, " whether the peculiar regulations of the Church are the sole ground, in virtue of which the application of Mr. Keet, has not been complied with?" — for you will find, that his application has not met vtilh a refusal, but the path was pointed out, liov/ to obtain his wishes. And as he has never been taken on trials, it is not possible to answer your second question, " whether there be any objection on the score of conduct, demeanor, or qualifications generally, which may stand in the way of his ordination?"— the answer being included in the first. I then beg to call your attention to the following statement of facts. Some time after Mr. Keet had been appointed nn Agent of the Wynberg and Rondebosch Christian Instruction Society, 1 became aware that Mr. Keet was in the habit of holding re- ligious meetings at stated periods and diiferent places. I felt it my duty to speak to him about it, and, in an amicable way, I reminded him of what had taken place at Riversdale. where he had thro-wn up his membership of the Dutch Reformed Church, in consequence of the consistory tf^king steps at that place, to prevent his preaching as layman. I told him thattlie rules were yet the same, that the Church does not allow any of her lay members to be public religious teachers, unless they have been taken on trials, and duly admitted as such by the Presbytery ; that his doing so contrary to rule placed me in an unpleasant position, as I couid not countenance it; that he was aware of all this, when he had applied to me for being again admitted as a member of the Dutch Reformed Church, and when he solcnjnly promised obedience to the laws and regulations of the Church. Knowing how soon tlie cry of " persecution " is raised, when 16 steps are taken for enforcing the rules for the maintenance of good order in the Church, I avoided forbidding his preaching by the consistory, in forma; but I strongly advised him to apply for a licence for holding religious meetings, and to oifer himself to the Presbytery, to be taken on trials. Mr. Keet inquired from me, what examination he would have to undergo, and at the time observed that he did not know any thing of Church History. I offered him my services, and assured him, that if he would read with me two evenings in the week, during the winter, he would be so well acquainted with the main facts of Ecclesiastical History, that.I was sure he would pass well. Mr. Keet promised to consider about it. More than once after that I reminded him of the importance of taking that step, as he knew that he was all the while acting contrary to his promise of obedience to the Church, — pointingout to him the reasonableness ofthatruleofthe Church, as there was also at that time, in another part of my parish, another person holding " religious meetings," who bore a very bad moral character, against whom I could not act as long as I allowed Mr. Keet to go on. He observed, that he thought the Christian Instruction Society would not like him to take that step, as it would appear, that he was working more especially for the Dutch Reformed Church, instead of equally working for the different protestant denominations. So matters remained; my advice was not followed, nor were my offered services accepted. All at once, however, I received on the same day, 21st January 1846, two letters from Mr. Keet, the one enclosed in the other, (see copies annexed, La. A, B.) containing a request of obtaining a document from the Presby- tery /or iioldmg public divine worship. (I underline these words, because it appears from them, that up to the 21st of January, Mr. Keet did not ask for ordination to the spiritual charge of a congregation.* ) My reply to these was, a pointing out of those articles in the Church regulations, to which he was to pay attention, for ob- taining his wishes, mentioning that the Presbytery was to meet in October next.f After a lapse of two months and a half, during which time I had no interview with Mr. Keet, I received a letter from him, addressed to the consistory of the Dutch Reformed Church at Wynberg, requesting his name to be taken from the list of com- municants, see copy. La. C. The consistory not wishing to slight Mr. Keet, by granting him his request forthwith, addressed to him the letter annexed, see La. D. To this letter an answer was obtained on the 30th of April, see annex, La. E, to which was replied, on the 11th May 1846, see annex. La. F. The consistory never was so much as honored with an ac- * Which he did three months later, as the Reader will find, when he intimates his wish to the Consistory. t Of this letter I kept no copy. 17 knovvledgment of the receipt of this letter, much less was the proposed query ever answered.! These, reverend and dear Sir, are the transactions between Mr, Keet and the reverend consistory of the Dutch Reformed Church at Wynberg and its Pastor. From them it will be diffi- cult to make out that Mr. Keet has ever " applied to the Colonial Reformed Church, to be by them taken on trials," as you men- tion in the former part of your letter ; much less " that the application of Mr. Keet has not been complied with," as is stated in the latter part. Trusting that I have given you all the necessary information for your guidance in this matter, I remain, dear Sir, Faithfully yours, P. E. FAURE. The Rev. J. Adamson, d.d. Cape Town. La. A. Wynberg, 2lst January 1846. Reverend Sir, Having had a communication with the Reverend Dr. Robertson in Cape Town yesterday, which occasioned my coming to the resolution, in case the Committee of the Christian Instruction Society would consent to it, to apply to you (or the Presbytery of the Reformed Church,) for a document of admis- sion to the holding of religious worship, I now beg kindly to request, that you will have the goodness, the Committee having given me permission this morning, to forward to or lay the en- closed letter before the Presbytery, and to favor me with an answer as soon as possible. Hereby you will oblige, Your obedient Servant, A. E. V. W. KEET. Rev. Mr. P. E. Faure. La. B. Wynberg, 21st January 1847. Reverend Sir, Having been informed by you, that it is a law with the Reformed Church, that when any member of the congregation X So late as the 24th September, and therefore on the 9th day after the writing of this letter to Dr. Adamson, the consistory received a letter from Mr. Keet, which was dated the 7th September mentioning that he had applied to Messrs. Stegmann and Adamson to be ordained ; as he saw that he would be exposed to but too many disappointments with the Dutch Reformed Church. — The reader may have his own opinion about the date, — let him but take in consideration that Mr. Keet's residence is not yet ten minutes' walk from mine. wishes to be aduiitted to hold public worship, he must apply io the Presbytery, I hereby kindly request you will, on my behalf, make such application, in order that I may soon obtain such a document. In good expectation, I have the honor to be, Reverend Sir, Your obedient Servant, IJev. Mr. P. E. Faure. A. E. V. W. KEET. La. C, Wynberg, 6th April 1846. Reverend Gentlemen, As I feci obliged from v/eighty reasons again to resign my membership from your church, I kindly request that you will erase m.y name from the register of members. I have the honor to be. Reverend Gentlemen, Your obedient Servant, To A. E. V. W. KEET, The Consistory of the Dutch Reformed Church at Wynberg. La. D. Wynberg, 14th April 1847. Dear Brother, The Consistory of the Dutch Reformed Church at "VVynberg has requested me to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 6th instant, and as you state "to have weighty- reasons again to resign your situation as member of our church community," I am to request that you will communicate those weighty reasons to the Consistory, as it cannot be indifferent to the Consistory to be made acquainted with the moving causes why a member, who, at his confirmation so solemnly signified his wish, again to be accepted to the communion of our church, expressed his regret that he had left it, and then declared de noi'o to join himself to the Reformed Church as the dearest to him of all churches, should now wish to leave the congregation. The request in your letter appeared the more strange to the Consistory, after they had seen the letter which you addressed to the Minister on the 21st January last, whereby you state, that you would apply to the Presbytery to have a proper licence for holding public worship. The Consistory therefore request your answer hereto as soon as possible, before deciding on your request that your name be erased from the register of members. I remain. Your obedient Servant and Brother, • J. A. TRUTEK, Act. Sec. Mr. A. E. v. W. Fur. 19 La. E. Wynberg, 30tli Apii! 1846. Reverend GenUeraeti, In answer to both your letters of the 14th and 28th instant, I wish to say that I heartily regret again to have found myself conipelled to resign the membership of the Reformed Chuvch of this place, and as you have now already requested on two occasions, to state to you the weighty reasons which have given rise to it, I have, after having earnestly consulted the Lord, and afterwards some of my christian friends, come to the resolution to comply with your request, and to communi- cate the same to you, — for which purpose I beg first to remark, that I have not taken the step in question on account of having any thing in tlie least, against the principles of the Dutch Reformed Church, as on the contrary, I confess that I have truly and with all my heart embraced the same, and consider those principles to be in complete accordance with the word of God, I intend to persevere in the faith thereof, through Gods help and mercy to the enCi. Wherefore I also whish further to declare, that on that account I had not the least desire to resign my membership. I tlierefore heartily feel grateful and rejoiced at the opportunity which you have oGered me to assign the rea- sons, which have induced me to the taking of the above step, and for that purpose, I beg to call your attention to the fol- lowing. It is now about ten years ago, since, for the first time, I was called by the Lord in the way of his providence (as I have every reason to believe,) to preach the dear gospel, particularly to the heathen. And (besides at other places,) I have also here, where I have laboured amongst them for nearly five years, ex- perienced no small degree of blessing in that work. I have constantly been encouraged to proceed therein, amidst many difficulties and temptations, and I