I B4557tu o ^V»^- ^».w«„.- Z^"?? «.x SOME ACCOUNT OF THE LIFE AND WRITINGS xi^%'|(;^ OF ^^ y JAMES BENIGN E BOS SUET, BISHOP OF MEAUX. By CHARLES BUTLER, Esq. LONDON: PHINTED FOR LONGMAN, HURST, REES, OllME, & BilOWN, PATERNOSTER ROW. 1812. Quare quis tandem rae repreliendat, si quantum cacteris, ad festos dies ludorum celebrandos, quantum ad alias voluptates, et ad ipsam requiem animi et cor- pores, conceditur temporis, quantum alii tempestivis conviviis, quantum aleae, quantum pilae, tantum mihi egomet, ad haec studia recolenda, surapsero. Cic. pro Archid. Le changement d'etude est toujours un delassement pour moi. D'Aguesseau. Printed by Luke Hansard ^ Sons, iitar Lincnln's-lnn FkldS, London. TO JOHN WEBBE WESTON, Esq. OF SUTTON PLACE IN SURRY; THIS BOOK IS INSCRIBED, (With a pleasing recollection of their long Friendship), BY THE AUTHOR. By the same Author, I. HOR.^ BIBLIC.E,— being a succinct Account of the Text, and literary History, of the Bibles, or Sacred Books of the Jews and Christians: and of the Bibles, or Books accounted sacred, by the Maho- metans, Hindus, Parsees, Chinese, and Scandinavians. Part the First, — containing a succinct Account of the Original Text, early Versions, and printed Edi- tions of the Old and New Testament. The Fourth Edition. II. HOR.E BIBLICiE, Part the Second ; being a succinct Account of the Koran, Zend-Avesta, Vedas, Kings, and Edda. Second Edition. With Two Dis- sertations : 1. On the Council, said to have been held by the Jews at Ageda, in Hungary, in 1650, with the original Narrative of that Council. 2. An Historical Outline of the Disputes respect- ing the Authenticity of 1 John, chap. v. ver. 7. III. HORiE JURIDIC^ SUBSECIViE; being succinct Account 01 the Geography, Chronology, and Literary History of the principal Codes, and original Documents of the Grecian, Roman, Feudal, and Canon Law. Second Edition. IV. A succinct History of the Empire of Germany, (or the principal States which composed the Empire of Charlemagne), from his Coronation in 814, to its Dissolution in 1806; — Of the Genealogies of the Imperial House of Hapsburgh, and the Six Secular Electors of Germany ; and on Roman, German, French, and English Nobility. Second Edition. V. The Life of Fenelon, Archbishop of Cambray. VI. The Life of the Reverend Alban Butler. CONTENTS. CHAP. I. The Family of Bossuet - - - ^ page i II. The early Studies of Bossuet - - - . 2 III. The first Appearance of Bossuet in public Life ------ -__._y IV. Bossuet's Classical Studies - - - - _ g V. Bossuet's Condemnation of Stage Entertain- ments --------_»_ ij^ VI. Bossuet's " Exposition of the Doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church" ----- ^^ VII. Conference of Bossuet with M. Claude - 43 VIII. Bossuet's History of the Variations of the Protestant Churches ------ yo IX. Bossuet's personal Conduct towards Protes- tants;— his Principles respecting Religious Toleration -----_-__y6 X. The Correspondence of Bossuet and Leibniz, on the Re-union of the Lutheran Protestants to the Roman Catholic Church - - - 81 XL The Part taken by Bossuet, in the Declaration of the General Assembly of the Gallican Clergy in 1682, respecting Ecclesiastical Power _._..pp CONTENTS, CHAt*. XII. The other Controversial Writings of Bos- suet -------- page 111 XIII. Funeral Orations of Bossuet - - - - 113 XIV. The Sermons of Bossuet - - - - -131 XV. The Biblical Works of Bossuet - - - 143 XVI. The other Devotional Works of Bossuet 145 XVII. Bossuet appointed to be Preceptor to the Dauphin ---------156 XVni. Bossuet solicits the Canonization of St.Vincent of Paul ---------161 XIX, Bossuet as Bishop ; -his last Years and Death 168 LIFE OF BOSSUET. CHAP. I. THE FAMILY OF BOSSUET. Tl OS SUET descended from an antient and noble family in Burgundy. Several members of it had filled, with credit, offices of distinction in the Parliament of Dijon. On the first estabhshment of the Parliament of Metz, the dignity of its first President was conferred on the uncle of Bossuet ; and the father of Bossuet was appointed one of it's Counsellors. He had two sons; Anthony, the eldest of them, became Master of Re- quests, and afterwards Intendant of Sois- sons ; the second of them is the subject of these pages; he was born on 27th of Sep- tember 1627. B .=M CHAP. II. THE EARLY STUDIES OF BOSSUET. An ardour for study was discovered in Bossuet, in his very earliest years. He was first placed under the care of his uncle ; who, being himself a man of learning, quickly perceived the great natural talents of his nephew, and took pleasure in cultivating them. While he was a mere boy, Bossuet accidentally opened, in his uncle's library, the Old Testament; he devoured it with avidity, and, in his old age, frequently men- tioned the pleasure which he had received from its perusal. He used to say, that no work had given him such exquisite delight, as he had felt on his first perusal of the Bible. This was equally a proof of his good sense, and true piety. The exquisite de- scriptions of domestic life and manners, with which the Old Testament abounds, the in- teresting narratives which it contains, of the pubhc events in the history of the chosen 3 seed, the countless beauties and frequent sublimity of its poetical and prophetic parts ; and, above all, the affecting simplicity which is spread over the whole of the sacred vo- lume, make it, even as mere literary compo- sition, the delight of every man of real taste. The beauty and sublimity of the New Tes- tament are still more strikinij. — It was na- tural therefore that the divine pages should captivate such a mind as Eossuet's, even in his very earliest years. It is to his praise, that this attachment to them increased with his years. In time, they became so familiar to him, that the verse, the line, the word w^hich he wished to remember, was ever present to his memory ; and it w as generally supposed by his friends, that he knew the whole contents of the sacred volumes by heart. He was placed, by his uncle, at the College of the Jesuits at Dijon. His labori- ous apphcation to his tasks, was the wonder of his schoolfellows, and procured from them, in allusion to the surname of his family, the nick-name of Bos Suetus Aratro. The Jesuits wished to retain him among them; but, as soon as he had reached the class of B 2 4 rhetoric, his uncle, who had other views for him, removed him to Paris, and entered him in the Colleo-e of Navarre. Nicholas Cornet o was principal of that college. He shewed a marked affection for Bossuet, and directed his studies. He was a person of great learn- ing ; and one of the earliest and most formi- dable antagonists of the Jansenists. Bossuet always spoke of him, in terms of the highest - esteem, and, at his decease, pronounced his funeral oration. He mentions in it a circumstance greatly to the praise of M, Cornet. One of his friends having a law- suit, M. Cornet exerted his interest in favour of his friend, with the judge, who was to try the cause ; and it was decided in his favour. Some time afterwards, M. Cornet had doubts of the justice of the decision ; and, being apprehensive that it had been influenced by his conversations with the judge, he paid to the adversary the whole amount of the sum in dispute. The manner in which Bossuet defended his Philosophical Thesis, first brought him into notice. Throui^h life, he was a warm ad- vocateofthe Cartesian Philosophy; "Friend- ly, but warm disputes," says Huet, the cele- 5> brated Bishop of Avranches, " frequently took place between us, on the subject of Cartesianism." Bossuet's Defension of Uni- versal Theology was honoured by the pre- sence of the great Conde; who w^as at that time a student at the College of the Jesuits at Paris. It is related of the prince, as an early instance of his glorious impetuosity, that, during Bossuet's Defension, he was re- strained, with difficulty, from rising in the assembly, and disputing in form with him. A compliment, w hich Bossuet took an op- portunity of paying the prince, w as univer- sally admired. An intimate friendship soon took place between them, and only ended with the prince's life. In 1652, Bossuet received the order of priesthood. He had previously taken the degree of doctor. In the discourse, which, according to custom, he pronounced on that occasion, he solemnly devoted himself to the cause of Religion. — '^ Under thy auspices," he ex- claimed, "O sacred Truth! I will joyfully " approach those altars, which are to wit- '^ ness the oath which I am about to take ; " an oath, which our ancestors have often '' heard. — That most pleasing and most B3 ^'^ sacred oath, by which I am to bind myself? " even to death, to the holy cause of Truth. '* O Words, rather of a martyr, than a doc- '* tor of truth! Yet, surely not less becom- ^' ing the latter than the former! For both are equally to testify to truth. Where- fore, O Divine Truth! O Truth conceived in the eternal Father! Who, descend- " ing from him to mortals, deliveredst " thyself to us in the holy Scriptures! To " Thee, we bend ourselves, wholly and un- '^ reservedly: To Thee, we dedicate our " very existence! Never shall we forget, " that those, who should be prodigal of " life, should never spare exertion in thy " cause." CHAP. III. THE FIRST APPEARANCE OF BOSSUET IN PUBLIC LIFE. The first preferment of Bossuet was a Canonicate in the cathedral church of Metz ; and he was successively raised to the rank of Archdeacon, and Dean in that Church. The affairs of the cathedral^ making it necessary that he should go to Paris, he frequently preached in the Capital. His sermons were universally applauded, and he was appointed to preach the sermons of the Lent of 1663, before Lewis the XIV, in the chapel of the Louvre. His majesty was so pleased with his sermons, that he ordered M. Rose, his private secretary, " to " write, in his name, to the father of Bossuet, " and congratulate him on the great talents " displayed by his son ; and to mention " the pleasure, which his majesty received " from his sermons." In 1669, the king nominated Bossuet to the Bishoprick of Condom. B 4 Having led Bossuet to this important epoch of his hfe, we shall attempt to some view of his character, — as a man of let- ters, — a controvertist, a preacher, and a prelate. CHAP. IV. eossuet's classical studies. All the Bibliographers of Bossuet men- tion, that, in the early part of his studies, he acquired a perfect knowledge of the greek and latin languages ; that he had repeatedly perused the works of the principal poets, historians and orators of antiquity, and that Homer and Demosthenes, among the greeks, and Virgil among the latins, were his fa- vorite authors. His acquaintance with them, gave him that chaste and nervous style,' which is so seldom attained by persons, who* have not formed themselves on those models.' In the works of such writers, brilliant, pa- thetic, and even sublime passages are often found ; but that, which constitutes the per- 9 fection of style, and alone enables it to engage attention, when it is not excited by a sentiment, an image, or a turn of phrase particularly striking, the indescribable charm of the proper word in the proper place, is learned nowhere, but in the greek and roman school. With how much difficulty it is attained, Bossuet himself is a striking example. The Benedictine editors of his works, inform us, that his manuscripts are so much disfigured by obliterations, inser- tions and corrections of every sort, as to be almost illegible. This is the case of almost all writers, whose works reach a future age. It was particularly the case of a celebrated orator and author of our times. Nothing seems more flowing or more easy than the style of the late Mr. Edmund Burke ; it has all the appearance of an effusion of unpre- meditated eloquence. But we are informed, that, almost every period in his writings^ was written over three times, at least, before it satisfied its author ; and that, even in that state, the work was printed, with a large margin, for the purpose of a still further revision ; and was, even then, once more corrected before it was submitted to 10 the public eye.- — Such is the toilsome drud- gery, to which every writer must submit, who aspires to be numbered among the classical writers of his country. — Yet, after all the labour we have mentioned, the writings of Bossuet, those even, which he polished with the greatest care, are not wholly free from sins against syntax and grammar. Through life, Bossuet was a very early riser : and if, while he was in bed, his sleep was delayed or interrupted, he availed himself of it, to write his letters, or to com- mit to paper, any interesting thought which occurred to him ; he also frequently gave this time to prayer. No portion of time, he used to say, was so favourable to devotion, as the stillness of the night; none, when the Holy Spirit was more propitious to those, who invoke him. He had no regular hours for his meals ; visits of ceremony, which the most im- perious etiquete did not prescribe, he neither received, nor paid : but it appears that he was easy of access, and affable in conver- sation. — He was so covetous of his time, as to deny himself the blameless recreation of a walk in his garden. Once, however. 11 he fell into conversation with his gardener ; and remarked that his garden had few of his visits. — " That is very true," said the gardener; ^' but, if the trees bore Chrysos- " toms or Austins or Ambroses, you would ^' be devouring their fruit, from morning " to night." After he had compleated his studies, classical literature seems to have had little of Bossuef s attention. He not only blamed the introduction of pagan mythology into works of religion, but thought, tliat it should be sparingly and guardedly used, even in mere works of taste. On the publication of M. de la Quinti- naye's work on gardening, the celebrated Santeuil addressed to him, some elegant latin verses, in which he introduced the goddess Pomona, applauding the work, and exulting in its success. Santeuil w^as en- gaged, at that time, in composing hymns for the new Breviary of Cluni ; but it too often happened, that some profane subject attracted his attention, and made him truant to his sacred muse. On this, his friends often expostulated with him ; he always professed to repent, and promised amend- 12 ment, but too soon repeated the offence. The verses to M. de la Quintinaye were a new crime : Bossuet affected to be violently angry at them ; and both Fenelon and Fleury gave the poet a tenible account of the Prelate's anger. To sooth it, Santeuil addressed to Bossuet a poem of exquisite art and beauty. He begins by professing his zealous and unvaried attachment to religion; mentions his sacred labours; ob- serves that some relaxation from them was tiecessary; and where, he asks, can a poet seek relaxation, better, than in the sportive strains of poetic personification? — " And, after all, was there any thing really alarm- ing in mentioning Pomona .^^ Was Bos- suet, the glory of the gallican hierarchy, the oracle of the whole church, to whom even royalty listened with respect, was he to be scared at the name of Pomona? But the poet would never be guilty of the like offence : he would dedicate himself entirely to holy themes. — As a penance for his of- fence, he would sing the praises of the eter- nal Father, his coeternal Son, and the Spirit which proceeds from both in strains, which Eossuet himself would vouchsafe to hear. — 13 Would not this atone for Pomona? — If it did not, he would dress himself in sackcloth, sprinkle his head with ashes, tie a rope round his neck, and hold, like a criminal, a burning taper in his hand : At the head of an immense multitude, who were to serve for witnesses of his humiliation, he would present himself before the Prelate, at the threshold of the altar, and, on his knees, confess his fault, and implore it's forgive- ness." — To these verses, Santeuil prefixed an etching, in which he himself appeared the dismal figure described in his verses. With one hand, he seemed to strike his breast; and, with the other to hold a burning taper, with which he burnt his guilty verses. Bossuet was drawn in his episcopal robes, with his mitre and crosier, and seemed to stretch out his hand to the humbled and contrite bard. It is needless to say, that Bossuet's wrath was appeased, and that he took the bard into favour. " Behold !" said Bossuet in a letter which he writ to him, on receiving the verses, — " Behold, what is gained by a little " humility. —You were guilty of a little " fault; humbled yourself a little for it; — " and in the instant, you compose the finest " verses which you have yet produced." M CHAP. V. bossuet's condemnation of stage entertainments. If Bossuet censured, with so much se- verity, a mere casual allusion to pagan my- thology, no indulgence could be expected from him to Stas^e Entertainments. A letter, which Father CafFaro, a Theatine Monk, published in their defence, produced from him a very eloquent reply. As the subject is interesting, and Bossuet's reply to Father Caffaro, is a fair specimen of his eloquence in controversy, an account of it, in this place, may be acceptable to the reader. The scenic exhibitions of Rome did not survive her: the theatres themselves and all their pride, pomp and circumstance, perished in the general wreck, to which, the irrup- tions of the barbarians reduced the arts and sciences of the Roman world. The first glimmering of the restoration of the drama is discernible in some exhi- bitions, which generally made a part of the national feasts of the Carlovingian monarchs. 15 These feasts were opened by a grand high- mass ; the dehberation followed, and was succeeded by a sumptuous dinner. After dinner, shows of foreign beasts, and of ani- mals, trained to do particular tricks and exercises, were exhibited ; and ballad singers, harpers and jugglers, the rude forefathers of the modern drama, also attended, and con- tributed their share to the festivities of the day. Chivalry introduced into them, magnifi- cence, order and refinement. It is probable, that the tilts and tournaments of the feudal ages excelled, ^vhatever antient or modern times have produced, in the form of public spectacle ; and to them, we owe the revival of the scenic art. The provencal bards often appeared at them, in companies, and recited tragic or comic poems. By degrees, they formed them into dialogues, and, to make their dialogues more interesting, put on a dress and gait suitable to those of the persons, whose characters they assumed. From this, the passage to an exhibition, possessing all the substantial requisites of a scenic enter- tainment, was easy ; and, as nothing could be more congenial than these exhibitions, to i6 the taste and manners of a chivalrous age, they soon attained a high degree of order. But there was more pageantry in them, than of dialogue, and every thing about them had a military air. Devotion, how- ever, had some share in them ; so that there w^ere both secular and religious dramas. They were distinguished into Mysteries, in which, remarkable events in the Scriptures, or in the lives of the saints, were repre- sented; Allegories, in which Faith, Hope, Charity, Sin and Death, and other mystic beings, ^vere introduced to speak and act in personification ; and Moralities, in which, sometimes real, and sometimes fictitious characters were brought into scenic action, and a general moral was drawn from the exhibition. Of these entertainments, the Mysteries were most popular : they were sometimes performed in churches. " We '^ cannot sufficiently wonder," says the Pre- sident Renault (Remarques particulieres sur V histoire de Finance, troisieme race), ^' that these mysteries were represented " under the sanction of the most respec- " table magistrates. — Jesus Christ, the " Holy Virgin, whatever is most sacred in 17 " religion, was brought on the stage in a " guise of familiarity, to which we cannot *' reconcile ourselves. But the ditference " of the times solves the enigma ; and, while " it shews the ignorance and simplicity, " proves the good-humoured innocence of " the age, which w^as fond of such exhibi- " tions. We must not suppose that they " were profanations of religion ; they were " spectacles, which, by placing rehgious " subjects before their eyes, in a manner highly calculated to impress them on their conceptions and feelings, conveyed instruction to a gross and ignorant people. — And, after all, are we not fallen on " times, which make us regret this age of " simplicity, in which there was so little of " false reasoning, and so much of honest " belief;' . A confraternity, under the appellation of the Confraternity of the Holy Passion, ob- obtained from the Parliament of Paris, a patent, which conferred on the members of it, the exclusive right of representing dra- matic exhibitions in the City of Paris ; but the disorders, to which they gave rise, induced the Parhament, in 1541 and 1548, C a a i8 to forbid their representing sacred subjects. — At a much eadier period, the exhibition of them in churches, had been absolutely prohibited by the clergy. — When these sa- cred exhibitions were interdicted to the Confraternity of the Holy Passion, they assigned their privilege to a troop of comic actors, called the '■ Enfans sans Sou(^i.' There were other companies, but the Enfans sans Soil^i were always the favorite performers. Their privilege was revoked in 1584. They were succeeded by a company called the * Gelosi ;' and those, by the company called ' L'Elite Royal,' which, in 1641, was indi- rectly sanctioned by an edict of Lewis the 13th, — the Magna Charta of the French theatre. This company afterwards divari- cated into two branches ; one established itself at the Hotel de Bourgogne, and the other at the Hotel d'Argent aux Marais, The abolition of tilts and tournaments, the revival of the arts and sciences, the merit of some dramatic writers, the great exten- sion of the City of Paris, the encrease of its wealth and of the number of its idle inhabitants, and the consequential diffusion of gallantry ; produced, in the capital, an 19 universal passion for stage entertainment. It rapidly pervaded every part of the king- dom, so that, towards the end of the reiffli of Lewis the 14th, there scarcely was, in his dominions, a town of any consequence, which had not its theatre. — The introduction of the Italian opera into France, in 1 ^y^^ carried dramatic song and dance to their utmost pitch of refinement. Such was the rise and progress of the French stage. It was always viewed by the State, with a considerable degree of jealousy. A capitulary of Charlemagne, of the year 809, ranks theatrical performers among discreditable persons. In 1181, Philip Augustus banished actors from his court; St. Lewis would never admit them to it; Lewis the 13th subjected the theatre to severe regulations: — those were adopted, and others provided by a legisla- tive enactment, which, in 1680, Lewis the 14th addressed, in the form of a letter, to the Lieutenant-General de Police. It seems to carry precaution, for the pre- vention of improper representations on the stage, and repressing immorality among c 2 20 the actors, as far as practical precaution, in these respects, can be carried. It will be readily conceived, that the Church of France was more severe on sce- nic exhibitions, than the state. A multitude of French provincial councils, are men- tioned by French writers on this subject, which speak harshly of them : their censures of ecclesiastics, who frequent the theatre, are pointedly severe. The passages against the stage, which are cited from the rituals of particular churches of France, are numerous. Among the wri- ters against the stage, it's adversaries are proud to mention, one of the royal blood of France, Francis-Lewis, Prince of Conti. — The uniform practice of the curates of the Gallican church, was, to refuse the sacra- ments to theatrical performers, even in their last moments, unless they made a public promise that they would not appear again on the theatre ; and, if they did not make this declaration, christian burial was denied to their remains. . Still, the theatre was always frequented, and, among those who frequented it, per- 21 sons of the highest character, for probity, honor, and an exemplary discharge of duty, were always found. This was admitted by Bossuet. " Great examples," he told Lewis the 14th, "may be cited in defence of the " Theatre; but the reasons against it, are " still stronger than these examples." In this conflict of example and argu- ment, on the la^vfulness of stage entertain- ments, Father Caffaro undertook their de- fence, and proved himself an able advocate of their cause. The successive examples of Corneille, Quinault and Racine, who had quitted the theatre to lead a life of religious retirement, and who had publicly expressed repentance of their dramatic performances, (and whose example was followed, in 1760, by Gresset, the author of the immortal Vert- Vert,) — awakened similar sentiments of compunction in Boursault, a dramatic Avriter of some eminence in his day, and he confided his scruples to Father CafFaro. The father's reply to Boursault first appeared with the title, " LeWx d'un Thtoloiikn, " illustre par sa qualite et par so?i 7nerite, " consulte pour sgavoir si la comedie pent ^' etre permise, ou doit etre ahsolumcnt de- C3 22 ^'fendue ;" but, after the first edition of it, the words " Theologien illustre par sa qualite,'' were dropt in the title, and the work was announced as the letter " crun hoimne d' erudition et de merited It is generally prefixed to the ' Theatre de Boursault:' in the edition of that work in i 725, it is now before the writer's eye. Father CafFaro bedns his letter with an acknowledgement, which may be thought to make the defence of the stage, an arduous undertakino;. '' The more I examine the " holy fathers," — these are his own expres- sions, — " the more I read the works of Theo- logians, the more I consult the causists, the less I feel myself able to form any conclusion. The school divines are some- what less hostile to the theatre ; but I hardly find a passage in them, which sounds in its favour, when I feel myself overwhelmed by a torrent of passages from Councils and fathers of every age, who have thundered against the theatre, and employed all the fervour of their zeal and powers of their eloquence, to make it an object of horror to chris- tians." He eludes the sentence, which 23 these high authorities seem to pronounce against the stage, by bringing before the reader, the abominations, with which the theatrical representations of Rome abound- ed, and from which the theatre of his and our times are certainly free. — " But, you must read the fathers very carelesly, ' Bossuet indignantly replies, " if you find " that, in the theatrical exhibitions of their " times, the fathers condemned nothing '^ more than their idolatrous representations, *^ or their scandalous and open impurities. " — They equally condemn the idleness, the '' enormous dissipation of spirit, the violent " emotions so little becoming a christian, " whose heart should be the sanctuary of " the peace of God, the desire of seeing " and being seen, the criminal occurrence " of looks, the being engrossed with va- " nity, those bursts of laughter, which ba- " nish from the heart, all recollection of " God, of his holy presence, of his awful " judgments. In the midst of all this pomp " and agitation, w ho, they ask, can raise his " heart to God ? Who would be bold " enough to address himself to the deity, " and say to him, ' O my God, I am here, C4 24 '^ because it is thy holy will ?' In the midst' *' of the silly joy, and siily tenderness of the " stage, who can preserve a spirit of pray- " er? St. John (Ep. I. ch.ii. 15,16,) cries ^' out to all the faithful, 'Love not the world, ' nor that which is in the world : for every " thing in it is concupiscence of the liesh, " concupiscence of the eyes, or the pride " of life.' In these words, the world, and '' the theatre, Avhich represents the world, " are equally reprobated. In the theatre, " as in the world, all is sensuality, osten- " tation and pride ; in the theatre, as in the *' w orld, nothing but a love of these wretched " things, is inculcated. — All this and much " more is said by the holy fathers, and *' all of it is applicable to the theatres of " the present day." Father Caffaro cites, in favour of the theatre, several passages in the works of St. Thomas of Aquin, St Antoninus, Bishop of Florence, St. Charles Borromeo, and St. Francis of Sales. In answer to the arguments, drawn by him from these pas- sages, Bossuet observes, that, in all of them comedies are mentioned abstractedly, that is, not as they actually exist, but as, by 25 possibility, they might be constructed. In respect to the passages cited from St. I'homas, Bossuet particularly observes, that St. Thomas cannot be understood, to speak, in them, of comedies, in the actual accep- tation of that word; as comedies, in that acceptation of the word, did not exist in St Thomas's day. '^ At all events," Eos- suet says to Father Caffaro, '^ you confess '' that the writers, whom you cite, allow no *' scenic representation to be innocent, which " contains any thing contrary to good mo- ^' rals: Now, whether the scenic repre- " sentations of the present times, are con- '' trary to good morals, is the point in dis- *' cussion between us; your citations, there- " fore, prove nothing." In reply to an argument, which Father Caffaro urges in favour of theatrical repre- sentations, from their being tolerated by the civil government of every country, Bossuet observes, that, if the state permits them, it is not because the state approves of them, but because the state is apprehensive that the absolute interdiction of them, might, in great cities, always abounding in vice and luxury, occasion still greater disorders. 26 After thus endeavouring to remove, what he insinuates to be an unwarrantable pre- judice against the theatrical representations of modern times, in consequence of the harsh terms, in which the antient fathers con- demned the stage, — Father Caftaro proceeds to state, that the theatre of his day con- tained nothing contrary to decency or mo- rality. " Can you," exclaims Bossuet, — " Can you then really assert, in the face " of heaven, that dramatic compositions, in " which the virtue and piety of a christian, " are generally held out to ridicule ; in which " what the Gospel pronounces to be cri- " minal, is generally defended and made " agreeable; in which virgin purity is so *' often blurred by impudent acts and " words; — Can you really assert that such " compositions are free from crime? — Does *' it become the habit or name of a priest, *' to defend the silly gallantry, the maxims '^ of love, the invitations to enjoy the gay " hours of youth, which for ever resound ^^ in the operas of Quinault, — of Quinault, " whom I myself have seen a hundred .^* times bewaihng these follies? — Is it for " you, to recal him to compositions, which, , 27 since he has begun to think seriously ot his salvation, he so bitterly laments? " You say, that stage entertainments, only excite those passions, indirectly, distantly and accidentally. But, what is the direct object of those who compose, of those who act, and of those who at- tend these representations ? The wish of the author and the actor is, that the spec- tator should be enamoured of the heroes and divinities of the theatre ; that he should be taught the duty of sacrificing all but glory, and even glory itself, to love. Is it their wish that this should be taught, indirectly, distantly and ac- cidentally ? " You are sensible that immodest paint- mgs are universally condemned. But, how much more horrid is the indecency of theatrical representations ! There, it is not an inanimate marble, it is not a dry tint; all is action itself. The persons are alive ; the eyes, the tongue, the gestures are real, — and, while they seduce every imagination, and inflame every heart; talk not to me of passions which they excite, indirectly, distantly and acciden- 28 tally ! — What are those speeches, which excite youth to love, (as if youth of itself, were not sufficiently inconsiderate), which make them envy the very birds, whom nothing disturbs in their loves, and which prompt them to rebel against the laws of reason and modesty ? — Do these, and a hundred lessons of the kind, only excite passion, indirectly, distantly and acciden- tally ? If they do not excite it instantly and outrageously, the author, the per- former and the spectator, are equally dis- appointed. " After this, — do you dare say, either that the end and aim of the theatre is not to excite directly, and, by its own very pow ers, the fire of concupiscence ? Or do you dare say, that concupiscence is not evil? Can you say, that the virgin mo- desty of a well educated daughter, is only distantly and accidentally offended, by the dramatic heroines, who talk over their combats, their resistances, and their defeats. The modest, amiable, virtuous heroine of the theatre, confesses her fail- ings, the seductions of her heart; and the whole theatre applauds her. What 29 " a lesson does she give ? — how well does *' she enforce it?" Father CafFaro then remarks, that, he did not discover, from what he heard in confession, the wonderful mahgnity of the theatre, or the crimes, of which it is said to be the source: "Probably," says Bossuet, '' when you say this, you are not " thinking of what actresses, and singers, " have to confess, or of the scandals of " their loves. Is it nothinoj to sacrifice " the sex to public sensuality, in a manner, " still more fatally dangerous, than is done " in places which cannot be named? What " christian mother, or, if she were a pagan, " what decent mother, would not behold her " child in the grave, sooner than behold " her on the stage? — Was it for this dis- " grace, she would say, that I reared her, " with so much tenderness and care? Did I preserve her, day and night under my wings, for this public prostitution ? Who does not look on these christians, — (if, living in a profession so opposite to their baptismal vows, they may yet be called christians), — who, I say, does not look on them as slaves exposed to sale, in a pub- ■cc 30 " lie market? Their sex consecrated them " to modesty, to the retirement of a well " regulated house, and how do they appear " on the theatre? Do they not appear " with all the parade of those Sirens in the " temple of Vanity, so well described by ** Isaiah, whose looks are deadly, and who " receive back, in the applause which is *' given them, the poison which they fling " among the spectators ? Is it no crime, for " a spectator to pay for this luxury? — none, " to nourish this corruption? — none, to " teach them or learn from them, what " ought never to be known ?" " But," says Father Caffaro, '^ you " can't take a step, open a book, or even " enter a church, without meeting with " something which excites your passions; — " it is therefore no objection to the Theatre, " that you find in it objects which excite " them." — " The reasoning is excellent," says Bossuet: — " the world abounds with " unavoidable dangers, therefore you should " multiply them. Every creature you meet " with is a snare to man, you may therefore " invent new snares, for his ruin. Every " object that meets your eyes, may excite 31 " your passions, you may therefore add to " your dangers by seeking objects, whose " eleo-ance and refinement, make them more " dangerous. — Rather say, — the dangers of '' the world are ah^eady too great, let us " not add to them : — God vouchsafes his " assistance to us, in dangers inseparable '' from our condition, but he abandons us *' in dangers of our own seeking; he has " assured us that all who love danger shall " perish in it." Such is the general tone of Bossuet's Reply. It was communicated privately to Father CafFaro. He, almost immediately, answered it, by a letter, in which he pro- tested that the letter, which he had ad- dressed to Boursault, in defence of the theatre, was not designed for publication; and intimated, that it had been altered, in some respects, in the impression; but he seems to admit that the alterations in it were not of importance. He professes to be convinced by Bossuet's arguments, of the errors of the doctrines contained in it, and promises to retract them. This promise, he performed by a letter addressed by him, a few days after, to the Archbishop of Paris. 32 He expresses in it, the great concern, which, his having written the letter in question, had given him ; he retracts it unequivocally, and concludes by saying, that, after a full exa- mination of the subject, he was perfectly convinced, that the reasons, urged in de- fence of Stage Entertainments, were frivo- lous; and that the reasons, given by the Church, for her condemnation of them, were solid and unanswerable. The dispute w^as renewed several times, in the course of last century. In the first year of it, the actors on the French theatre presented a petition to the pope, in which, they represented to his holiness, that it was the year of the Church's centenary jubilee, and therefore a time of indulgence and benignity; that, since the church had first passed her censure on theatrical exhibitions, they had undergone a complete alteration, and been purged from the indecency and ri- baldry, which had provoked those censures ; they prayed therefore for a removal of them. But his holiness was inexorable ; and, by his direction, some works were published to justify the church's severity. — Towards the jniddle of the century a contest, on the 33 tendency of Stage Entertainments, took place between Rousseau and D'Alembert. — The latter, in an article in his Miscellanies, censured the magistrates of Geneva, for not permitting a theatre within that city. Rousseau undertook the defence of the ma- gistracy, and replied to D'Alembert in a let- ter, which has been much admired, both for its eloquence and argument. The principal object of it, is to shew, that the morality of the Stage is not the morality of real probity ; that comedy places virtue in a ridiculous light, and makes immorality agreeable ; and that tragedy makes crime an object of admiration, by the splendor of talents and glory, with which she radiates it. D' Alembert replied to Rousseau : his letter contains many sensible observations, but, as a literary composition, sinks before that of his antagonist. In 1761, the celebrated ]VP"* Clairon, professionally consulted with M. Huerne de la Motte, a French avocat, on the reprobation of actors by the civil law^ of France, and the supposed ex- communication of them by the Galilean Church. M. Huerne de la Motte delivered his opinion, in a long dissertation, in which D 34 he attempted to shew, that the laws both of the State and the Church against the Theatre, were founded in prejudice; and that the supposed excommunication of the actors was an invasion of the Hberties of the GaUican Church. On the motion of M. Joly de Fleury, the Procureur General of the King, the Parhament of Paris ordered this dissertation of M. Huerne de la Motte to be burned by the hangman ; and, on a general requisition of the French bar, M. Huerne de la Motte was expelled from it. M. Desprez d'Boissy, in his " Lettres sur les Spectacles," (ed. 1774, 2 part, pa. 673) mentions, that two individuals having en- tered into an agreement to establish a new theatre, one of them, from motives of con- science, declined the adventure; that the other instituted, in one of the civil courts of Paris, a suit to compel him to perform his part of the contract ; and that the Court was of opinion, that the contract was morally vicious, and therefore legally void. It only remains to observe on this head, that Bossuet moulded his letter to Father Caffaro into the form of an Essay, and published it with the title " Maximes sur la Com^die." 35 CHAP. vr. BOSSUET's '^' EXPOSITION OF THE DOCTRINE OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH." Of all Bossiiet's controversial Works, this is the most valuable. In disputes of every kind, the first object of those, who really seek for truth, is to ascertain the precise points in difference between them and their adversaries ; then to see that they are ex- pressed with precision, both in words and substance ; and then to confine the discussion to them, with as little divergence as possible, into extraneous matter. It is surprising how much, by attending to these rules, good sense and good humour will lessen the number of apparent articles of disagree- ment, and reduce their weight. On the part of the Roman Catholics, this, by their universal consent, has been admirably performed by Bossuet, in the Work of which we are now speaking. It was composed originally for the private use of the Marquis de Dangeau ; and, having been D 2 3<5 comnmnicated by him to the Marechal de Turenne, that great man was sensible of it's merit, and circulated it every where : and thus, it became generally known. Copies of it got into many hands ; and a surreptitious edition of it, with several errors, w^as printed at Toulouse. This made it necessary that Bossuet himself should pub- lish an authentic edition of it. In composing it, he was sensible, how important it was, not only to himself, but to the w hole Church, that it should be absolutely free from error. With this view, he caused a small number of copies of it to be privately printed, and he circulated them among several persons of acknowledged learning and piety in the Galilean Church, with a request from him, that they would favour him with their re- marks, on any parts of it, that should appear to them obscure, erroneous or imperfect. — - After he had received their communications, he published the Work, and prefixed to it the formal approbations of the Archbishops of Rheims and Tours ; of the Bishops of Chalons, Usez, ]\leaux, Grenoble, Tulle, Auxerre, Tarbes, Beziers, and Autun. Soon after it's pubhcation, Bossuet re- 37 ceived from Cardinal Bona, Cardinal Chim, and Hyacinth Li belli, then Master of the Sacred Palace, afterwards Archbishop of Avignon, the most unequivocal and un- qualified approbations of it; and it was twice formally approved by Pope Innocent the nth, first, by a brief, dated the 2 2d of November 1678, and afterwards, by a brief dated the 12th of July 1679. The Clergy of France, in their Assembly of 1682, sig- nified their approbation of it, and declared it to contain the doctrines of the Roman Catholic Church. It is translated into the language of every country, where the Roman Cathohc religion is either dominant or tolerated. Roman Catholics have but one opinion of it: — in public and in private, by the learned and unlearned, it is equally ac- knowledged to be a full and faultless Ex- position of the Doctrine of their Church. A translation of it was published, in English, by the Abb6 Montagu, in 1672; in Irish, by Father Porter at the press of the Propaganda, in 1673; in German, by the Prince Bishop of Paderborn, in the same year; in Dutch, by the Bishop of i> 3 38 Castorie, in 1678; in Italian, by the Abbe Nazari, under the inspection of the Cardinal d'Etr6es, who, himself, corrected the proofs of the impression. This translation was formally approved of by Ricci, the secretary of the Sacred Congregation of Indulgences, and by Father Laurence Brancati, librarian of the Vatican ; and, with their permission, was dedicated to the Congregation of Pro- paganda. It was translated into Latin, under the immediate inspection of Bossuet, by the Abbe de Fleury, the author of the invaluable History of the Church. The Abb6 Lenglet du Fresnoy mentions (Me- moires d'Artigny, tom. 1. p. 336, note 6.), that the celebrated M. Basnage assured him, that, in the opinion of Protestants, it had injured their cause more than all other Roman Catholic works of controversy, col- lectively taken. — It is much to be lamented that tlie English translation of it is very ill executed. Several answers to it by Protestants were published : all of them agree in accusing Bossuet of disguising the tenets of the Ro- man Catholic Church, in order to make them more palatable to Protestants. But 39 surely, this charge cannot be supported. When a body of men, so numerous and so respectable as the Roman Catholics, (what candid Protestant does not allow them to be both numerous and respectable?), declare, without a single dissenting voice, that a par- ticular Work expresses their tenets, fully and unequivocally, it is indecent and unfair in the extreme, to charge it with disguising them. Should not those, who make the charge, rather acknowledge, that they had misconceived them ^ It is generally understood, that the Ro- man Catholic Church owes, to this invalua- ble exposition of her Faith, one of her most distinguished proselytes. The circumstance is thus related by the Cardinal Maury in his " Essai sur I'Eloquence de la Chaire," (ed. 1810. I vol. p. 252). Marshal Turenne was educated in the Protestant religion, and long continued at- tached to the principles of Calvin. While he adhered to them, he rendered his party every service which might be expected from his sincerity, his credit^ and his glory. So highly was his probity respected by Lewis 14th, that the monarch never expected D4 40 from the ambition or politics of Turenne, that change of his reHgious principles, which he so earnestly desired, but which, he knew, could only be expected from Tu- renne's real conviction. The king repeated often, but never in the presence of Turenne, that, in the war of the Fronde, when it was of so much importance to oppose Turenne to the great Conde, the Queen Regent had promised him the dignity of High Con- stable of France, the highest which a subject could fill, in the old government, and the monarch used frequently to declare, that he was ever ready, if, by a change of religion, Turenne would remove the only obstacle in its way, to perform the engagements of his mother. — One day, a sword of the most costly and exquisite workmanship, was pre- sented to Lewis the 1 4th to be worn by him, for the first time. The king extolled the workmanship of it ; and Turenne, who was present, took it out of the hands of the monarch, considered it with attention, and expressed his opinion of the beauty of its workmanship, in terms of admiration, which were not common to him. — " It gives me .^'. great pleasure," Lewis said to him with a 41 very serious look, " that you are satisfied " witli ,the workmanship of this sword. I " gave particular directions that it should " be finished in the highest degree of per- '' fection — Now hear my motive for it. It " is the sword, ^hich I designed for the " High Constable of France ; I shall only " wear it, while that office continues va- '^ cant. — It will suit you wonderfully ; and " it is your's whenever you please to receive *^ it. You know, there is an obstacle to it ; " (but it is an obstacle, which you yourself " can remove, when you will); and to " my most sincere regret, this circum- " stance alone prevents me from delivering " it, at this very moment, into your hands." Turenne immediately returned the sword to his majesty, saying, " that he felt himself " more honoured, than he could express, by '^ so flattering an expression of his majesty's '' kindness towards him, and that, in his " heart, he preferred it to all dignities." " But," added Turenne, " the attachment " which your majesty shews to your reli- *' gion, proves to me, how I should preserve " my attachment to mine." Some years after this circumstance took 4'i place, Bossuet's " Exposition of the Roman Catholic Doctrine," appeared. In it's ma- nuscript state, it was put, by the Marquis de Dangeau, into the hands of Turenne. He read it over and over again ; and, was sur- prised to find the statement, which it gives of the Roman CathoHc faith, so different from the hideous representation given of it, by the Huguenot ministers. At first, in unison with their language respecting it, he consi- dered it as a softened and unfair account of the doctrines, which it was intended to ex- hibit. — But, when it afterwards appeared in print, authenticated by the approbations of universities, doctors, bishops, cardinals, and the Pope himself, he was satisfied that it con- tained the doctrine of the Council of Trent, the real doctrine of the Roman Catholic church. From that moment, he determined to embrace the Roman Catholic religion; and Bossuet was the first person, to whom he communicated the important secret. He desired him to make the circumstance known to his majesty; and, at the same time, opened to him his whole mind. " His ma- " jesty," he said to Bossuet, " has, more " than once, intimated to me, his intention 43 *' of conferring on me the dignity of High *' Constable of France, when I should ab- " jure the Huguenot rehgion. Say, from me, *' to him, that I abjure the Huguenot and " embrace the Roman Catholic religion from '^ conviction. But I rely on his majesty's *^ kindness to me, that he will never men- '' tion to me the dignity of High Constable." CHAP. VII. CONFERENCE OF BOSSUET WITH M. CLAUDE. 1 H E account, which Bossuet has given of this Conference is extremely interesting. It turned on some points of the most important of all the articles in dispute between Ro- man Catholics and Protestants, — the autho- rity, by which Jesus Christ directed Chris- tians to be governed, in the disputes, which he foresaw, would arise on his doctrine. All Roman Catholics, and all the Protes- tants of the old school assert, that these disputes should be decided by the church. But, when churches themselves are divided, 44 the question must be, which of them is to be obeyed. The Roman CathoHc says, it is that church, which existed before all other churches, and from which all churches, not in union with her, have separated. This description, they assert, applies to the Ro- man Catholic Church, and to no other. She therefore, in their opinion, is the mis- tress and judge of controversies. Her au- thority, the separatists from her, deny ; and the dispute on this point is the most impor- tant of all their differences, as the decision of it involves the decision of every other ar- ticle in dispute between them. M. Claude, the antagonist of Bossuet in this Conference, enjoyed the highest reputa- tion in his party. Bossuet speaks of his learning, polite manners and mildness, in high terms of praise. He mentions, that, through- out the Conference, M. Claude listened with patience, expressed himself with clearness and force, pressed his own objections with precision; and, never eluded an objection made to him, which admitted of an answer. The Conference was held, at the request of Mademoiselle de Duras, a niece of the great Turenne. Several Huguenots of dis- 45 tinction assisted at it; the Countess de Lorges, a sister of Mademoiselle de Duras, was the only Roman Catholic present. On the day preceding the Conference, Bossuet, by the desire of Mademoiselle de Duras, waited on her, and explained to her, what he understood by the words, " Catho- '' lie Church," which he foresaw, would frequently occur in the Conference. He explained to her, that, in his controversy with M. Claude, he should not a[)propriate these words to the Roman Catholic Church, but use them to denote generally, what both M. Claude and he admitted, — an external and visible society, which professed to believe the doctrine of Jesus Christ, and to govern itself by his word. That, to found this society, the Son of God issued from his eternal Father; that, while he was on earth, he gathered round him certain men, who acknowledged him for their mas^ ter ; that, in subsequent times, the faithful aggregated themselves to that society, and formed, what is called in the Apostles' Creed, the Catholic or Universal Church : — Thatj sometimes surrounded by infidels, some- times torn into pieces by heretics, there had 46 not, from the first moment of her divine origination, been one instant of time, in which she had not possessed the faith, the doctrine, and the sacraments of Christ ; or in which, she had not been protected by him, or had not been visible, as the meridian sun, to all on earth : Had there been but a single instant, in which, she ceased to profess the faith or possess the sacra- ments of Christ, it would necessarily follow- that, the promises of Christ, to teach her all truth, to be with her to the end of the world, and to prevent the powers of hell from prevailing against her, would have failed. That there is such a Church, M. Claude admits. But it cannot, says Bossuet, be the church of M. Claude. — " The re- " formed Church, to justify her separation " from the Roman Catholic Church, must " either charge the Son of God with a " breach of his promise ; or shew the " other great and visible church, in which " the true faith has been uninterruptedly " preserved. — To assert the former, would " be blasphemy ; to assert the latter, would " be to deny historical evidence. When " the church of the Reformers first sepa- 47 " rated from the one, the holy, the Roman " CathoHc church, then' church, by their '' own confession, did not enter into com- " m union with a single Christian church " in the whole world." On the day after this conversation took place, Mademoiselle de Duras called on Bossuet, in company with M. de Coton, a Huguenot minister of distinction, per- sonally known to Bossuet, and esteemed by him. By her desire, Bossuet repeated to him, what he had mentioned to her on the preceding day. M. Coton objected to Bossuet, the promises of God to the Jews, and the frequent revolts of the gene- ral body both of the people of Israel, and the people of Judah, from the true worship : and concluded from it, that there might be a temporary interruption of the church of God, without a breach of the divine promise. To this, Bossuet re- plied, that it was evident from Scripture, that, though a great, or even the greater part of the chosen people had apostatized, still the true worship of God never was extinguished, never ceased to be gloriously discernible either in Israel or Judah; — 48 that, in the times of their greatest aposta- sies, the true worship was retained by a great portion of the people of each king- dom ; and that each of them had a regular succession of prophets ; so that the in- spired writers (Paral. xxxvi. 5. Jo. xi. 7. XXV. 1.4.) scrupled not to say, that, every mornino; and night, the Almighty Word arose and warned the chosen seed, by the mouths of his prophets, against the surrounding idolatry. " These prophets," continued Bossuet, " were themselves a part of the " people of God ; they kept the people to *^ their duty ; and preserved a large part " of them from corruption : and thus, " though a frightful portion of them, and *' perhaps even the mass of them, fell " into idolatry, there Avere always among *' them, those, who preserved pure, and " visible to all, the deposit of the true " worship." "To them," Bossuet said, " Eze- " chiel (xliv. 13.) alluded, when he men- " tioned the Priests and Levites, who, when " the children of Israel went astray, al- " ways observed the ceremonies of the " sanctuary ; served the Lord, and ap- " peared before him, to offer him victims." 49 Here, the conversation with M. Coton finished. — While they waited the arrival of M. Claude, to open the Conference, Bos- suet took occasion to mention to Mademoi- selle de Duras, that, in the course of the proposed Conference, he would prove to her satisfaction, three things; — the first, that the Huguenots acted, as if they believed that the authority of their church was infal- lible ; the second, that, though they acted in this manner, it was a maxim among them, that every individual, however ignorant, was obliged to believe he understood the scriptures, better than all the rest of the church. — This seemed to surprize her much: — He proceeded to mention to her the third, which she thought was still more strange ; — that it was an article of the Huguenot creed, that there was a period of time, during which, a Christian was obliged to doubt, whether the scripture were inspired by God, whether the Gospel were a truth or a fable, and whether Jesus Christ were an impostor, or the teacher of salvation. He undertook to force M. Claude to confess all this, or to convince her, that all of it E 50 was an evident and direct consequence of his principles. After this, they were informed that M. Claude was come, and the Conference began. We can only pretend to present the reader, with a short outhne of it : but we can confidently assure him, that, if he takes an interest in such polemic discussions, he will be abundantly gratified by perusing the whole of the account given of it by Bossuet. M. Claude's account of it has not fallen into the hands of the writer. Bossuet began the Conference, by asking, " if it were not among the Articles of the re- ^' formed church of France, that disputes on ** faith should be determined, if possible, by *^ the Consistory ; that, if they were not de- ^^ termined by the Consistory, they should be " determined by the Provincial Synod ; that, " if they were not determined by the Pro- *' vincial Synod, they should be determined *' by the Holy National Assembly; and ** that those, who refused to acquiesce in " the determination of the National As- ^' sembly, were to be declared out of the *• pale of the church, and excommunicated." 51 He further asked, " if the Circular Letter of ' the reformed churches, when they sent ' their deputies to the National Assembly, ' were not expressed in the following words: ' We promise, before God, to submit to all ' that shall be resolved in your Holy As- ' sembly; convinced, as we are, that God ' will preside over it, and guide you by his ^ Holy Spirit, into all truth and equity, by ' the rule of his word." Bossuet concluded by observing, that by this, the reformed church appeared to act as if they acknow- ledged the infallibility of the National Assembly. — This was the first of the three points, which he had undertaken to Made- moiselle de Duras, to bring M. Claude to confess. The facts, mentioned by Bossuet, were candidly admitted by M. Claude: but he denied the conclusion, which Bossuet drew from them; and, in a speech of some length, which Bossuet praises for its neat- ness and method, explained the nature of the arrangements mentioned by J]ossuet. He said, that the different Assemblies, men- tioned by Bossuet, had different degrees of jurisdiction; but that, in all of them, it was E 2 52 a jurisdiction of discipline ; and that the in- trinsic value of the truth of their decisions, and even of the decision of the National Assembly, depended solely, on their confor- mity to the word of God : and thus, accord- ing to M. Claude, an ultimate power of enforcing discipline, but no infaUibity in doctrine, was vested by them in the National Assembly. A discussion then took place, between Bossuet and M. Claude, to bring this to issue, and every word of it is highly interesting. At the end of it, Bossuet ob- served to M. Claude, that, if he understood him rightly, both the intermediate submis- sion required to the Consistory and Pro- vincial Synod, and the ultimate submission required to the National Assembly, w^ere conditional ; or, in other words, that a con- scientious submission could only be required, if the party thought their determinations were conformable to the word of God. — • To this, M. Claude assented : " Then," said Bossuet, " the profession of submission " might be equivalently couched, in these " words ; — I swear to submit to what you " shall decide, if I shall think your de- " cision is comformable to the word of 53 " God. — What does this really amount " to ?" A short silence ensued : Bossuet re- newed the Conference, by saying, — " You " believe, that an individual may call in " question the sentence of your church, *^ even when your church pronounces in the " last resort." " No, Sir," answered M. Claude, " it should not be said, that an " individual can lawfully doubt in such a " case, as there is every appearance that the " judgment of the Church will be right." — " To say that there is an appearance,'^ Bos- suet replied, " is to say that there is a doubt." " But," answered M. Claude, " there is " more than an appearance. Jesus Christ " has himself promised, that those who " truly seek him, shall find him. Now, " it should be presumed, in favour of the " Assemblies, that they seek him truly ; and " will, therefore, be certain of finding him. *^ To be sure, if it should appear that there " are cabals, or any other suspicious cir- " cumstance in the National Synod, the " confidence in it might be lessened, or ab- " solutely withdrawn." "Then, let us leave " these factions and cabals," said Bossuet, " out of the question. Let us suppose, E 3 54 " that there is no faction, no cabal, nothing " improper ; and that every thing passes in *'' perfect order: must its decision be re- " ceived without examination ?" M. Claude admitted that the right of examination existed. " Then," said Bossuet, " you ad- mit, that every individual, whoever he be, may believe, and even ought to believe, that it may happen to him to understand the word of God better than the National Assembly ; and even better than a coun- cil assembled from the four quarters of the world. — For, on what can this right or duty of examination be founded, but be- cause the individual may justly conceive, that he himself understands the word of God better than those, whose decision he has a right to examine ?" This was the second point, which Bossuet had promised Mademoiselle de Duras to make M. Claude admit. Bossuet now considered that he had set M. Claude between the horns of a perfect dilemma. — If M. Claude contended for the duty of submission, to the sentence of the National Assembly, under pain of excom- munication, Bossuet opposed to him his 55 acknowledgment of the right of individuals to try the propriety of that sentence by their private judgments ; — if M. Claude admitted this right of private judgment in an individual, Bossuet opposed to him the Assembly's right to excommunicate him for exercisintr it. — Contending; for the former, M. Claude admitted the first, — contending for the latter, M. Claude admitted the second of the positions, which Bossuet had promised INIademoiselle de Duras to make him confess. The Conference, however, proceeded. " Surely," said Bossuet, " this right of " individual examination, which you re- " cognize in each individual, must be ac- " companied with the highest individual " presumption." — " That, by no means " follows," replied M. Claude ; '' When " the synagogue declared that Jesus Christ " was not the Messiah, promised by the " prophets, and condemned him to death, " would not an individual, who believed " him to be the true Christ, have judged *' better than the synagogue ? Could you " accuse such an individual of presumptu- " ously believing, that he understood the " scriptures better than all the synagogue ?" E 4 5^ A more able reply than this of M. Claude cannot be conceived. It produced a great effect on all the persons present.— Bossuet informs us, in his relation of the Conference, that this effect of it was observed by him : that, though he himself was fully aware of the answer which he ought to give to it, he was afraid that he might not express it properly ; and that he therefore made a silent prayer to God, that he would inspire him to express it, in such terms, as would remove the im- pression, made by M. Claude on the minds of the audience. — After a moment's silence, he addressed M. Claude in these words : *' You say, that my assertion, that the in- " dividual, who sets up his own private " opinion, in opposition to that of the whole " church, must be guilty of intolerable " presumption, fixes the charge of equal " presumption on those, who believed in " Jesus Christ, in opposition to the sen- *^ tence of the synagogue, which had pro- " nounced him guilty of blasphemy. Most " certainly, my assertion proves nothing of " the kind. When an individual nozo sets " up his own private opinion in opposition " to that of the whole church, he sets it ^* up against the highest authority on earth, 57 "as the earth contains no authority, to " which an appeal from that authority can *' be made. But, when the synagogue " condemned Jesus Christ, there was on *' earth a much higher authority than the " synagogue ; to that authority the indi- " vidual, who reprobated the proceedings " of the synagogue, might appeal. Truth " herself then visibly existed among men ; " the Messiah, the eternal Son of God, — " He, to whom a voice from above had " rendered testimony, by proclaiming before *' the whole people, that he was the well- '^ beloved Son of God, — He, who restored " the dead to life, gave sight to the blind, *' and did so many miracles, that the Jews " themselves confessed no man had done " the hke before him, — -He, the Jesus him- *' self, then existed among men ; and was " the visible external authority, to whom ^' there was a lawful appeal from the ^' synagogue.— rHis authority was infallible. " I hear you say that it was a contested " authority. I know that it was contested ; " but, as a Christian, you are bound to say, " that no individual could reasonably or " conscientiously contest it. — It was not 58 therefore presumption, it was duty to disobey the synagogue and to believe in Christ. Bring back to me Jesus Christ in person ; bring him teaching, preaching, and working miracles, I no longer want the church. — But don't take the church from me, unless you give me Jesus Christ in person. You say you have his word. Yes, certainly ! we have his holy, adorable word ! But, what is to be done witli those w^ho understand it in a wrong sense? Jesus Christ is not present in person to set them right; they must therefore obey the church. Before Jesus Christ appeared among the Jews, they w^ere bound to obey the synagogue : When the synagogue failed, Jesus Christ came among men, to teach them all truth, and they were bound to obey his voice : When he returned to his Father, he left us his church, and we are bound to obey her voice. There is not, — no, there is not on earth, any visible higher authority, to which you can appeal from her." This, according to Bossuet's account, set Claude within a second dilemma : — if he said that the sentence of the National 59 Assembly was not to be questioned, Bossuet proved his assertion to Mademoiselle de Duras, that the Huguenots acted, as if they believed the authority of their church was infallible ; if he said the sentence of the National Assembly might be questioned, Bossuefs assertion, that it was a maxim of the Huguenot church, that every individual might believe that he understood the scrip- tures, better than the highest authority in his communion, was equally proved. — With much apparent reluctance, M. Claude veered to the latter position ; — and thus Bossuet professes to have performed his second promise to Mademoiselle de Duras. We now come to the last of the three points, which Bossuet had promised Made- moiselle de Duras, to make M. Claude confess, and which appeared to her the strangest of the three ; — that, " in the opi- " nion of Huguenots, there is a period, during " which a Christ icm is under a necessity *' of doubting, whether the Bible be inspired " by God, whether the Gospel be truth or " fable, and whether Jesus Christ were a " teacher of truth or an impostor." — Bossuet opened the discussion of this point by asking 6o M. Claude, " if a Christian, when he has " the Gospel put, for the first time, into his " hands, must necessarily doubt, whether " it be divinely inspired, before he can make *' an act of faith of its being the word of " God." M. Claude replied, that " in such " a situation, a Christian does not doubt, " but is ignorant, whether the Gospel is " divinely inspired. And permit me," he said to Bossuet, " to put the same ques- " tion to you, substituting, in my question, " the church, whenever, in yours, you " introduce the Gospel. I therefore ask " you, in my turn, whether a Christian, who " has the authority of the church, for the " first time, proposed to him, must not, " before he makes an act of faith of it, ^' necessarily doubt and examine the grounds " of that authority ? You see that the ques- " tion forces each of us into the same diffi- " culties ; — whatever you say on the sub- " ject, in reference to the Gospel, I shall " say upon it, in reference to the church." The disputants were now fairly at issue on two points; — the first, whether, in respect to the Gospel, M. Claude, by acknowledg- ing the right of previous examination, 6\ admitted, that, while that examination lasted, a Christian must necessarily doubt that the scripture was the word of God; the second, whether, in respect to the church, the same arguments should not force a si- milar confession from Bossuet. They were distinct points, and Bossuet appears to have been anxious to keep them distinct. " I perceive," he said to M. Claude, " the " tendency of your expressions. — Whether " you will argue, or will have a right to *^ argue, from my doctrine, respecting a " Christian's faith in the church, as I shall '^ argue from your doctrine respecting a " Christian's faith in the Gospel, we shall *' quickly see. For the present, let us stick " to the fact. — I aver that, according to " the principles of your church, there is a ^' moment, (I mean the period of examina- " tion) in which a Christian, (Idont speak " of an injidel) must doubt of the Gospel " and of Christ." " I have said," M. Claude answered, " that he is ignorant; he " does not doubt." " Can he then," said Bossuet, " when the Gospel is thus, for the " first time, presented to him, make an act of " divine faith, that the book presented to 62 " him, is the word of God." '' He cannot ;" answered ]\I. Claude, "he can only beUeve it " out of deference to the authority of his " parents, or of some other person. He is " a catechumen." — "No," said Bossuet, " he is not a catechumen; he is a Christian; " he has been baptized, and the aUiance " which baptism externally sealed on him, " has been internally sealed on his heart, " by the Holy Ghost."—" On that point," said M. Claude, "there are two opinions;" but M. Claude ingenuously added, " I " admit it." — " Then," said Bossuet, " it " follows, that, in virtue of the faith infused " into him in his baptism, a Christian, who " has attained the use of reason, is qualified " to make an act of faith, when it is ;" presented to him. I therefore, ask you, " whether, before he has examined the " Gospel, a Christian can make this act " of faith" — " I believe the scripture to be " the word of God, as I believe God to " exist." — M. Claude said that, after the Christian had read the scripture, he believed it to be the word of God by divine faith ; but that, until he had read it, he could not be led to this conclusion by human reasoning 63 only. " But human reason," said Bossuet, " is always fallible, and therefore always " doubtful. And thus, according to your " principles, there is a moment, — (that of " examination), during which, the Christian " necessarily doubts, or, if you prefer the " expression, is ignorant of what you call " the fundamental article of faith, — that " the scripture is the word of God, and " therefore, during the whole time of exa- *' mination, is an infidel." In this manner, Bossuet professes to have performed his third promise to M"" de Duras : it remained for him to defend himself against JVI. Claude's intimation, that, in maintaining a Christian's obligation to believe, with di- vine faith, the authority of the church, it would be necessary for Bossuet to admit that he must previously examine the point, as he must doubt it, during the continu- ance of such an examination, and be there- fore, during the whole of that period, an infidel. " No such consequence attends the Ro- '' man Catholic doctrine," said Bossuet. " The first instant after a Roman Catholic " or any Christian comes to the use of rea- ^^ json, he may make this act of divine (( 64 " faith, — I believe the church.— I entreat " you to observe, that I am speaking of a " baptized person, of a Christian, not of an *' infidel. In virtue of his baptism, theChris- " tian has the habit of true faith, and there- fore believes, when he attains the use of " reason, in God the Father, in God the " Son, in God the Holy Ghost, and in the " holy Catholic Church. The Apostles' " creed contains all these articles: and " the Apostles' creed is not a set of conclu- " sions, to which a child arrives by exami- " nation, but a declaration of the faith in- " fused into him at his baptism by the Holy " Ghost. Against this, the Infidel may " argue consistently with his tenets; a " Christian cannot. Thus the doctrine of " Roman Catholics is wholly free from the " difficulty you have intimated. All Roman '' Catholics, all Christians, except Protes- " tants, believe the divine authority of the " church to be an article of faith, infused " by the Holy Ghost into every Christian at " his baptism. Now, it is a tenet of the " church, that the scripture is the word " of God. — Thus, from the first instant of " their reason, the Roman Catholics believe " their church and the tenets of their church; 65 " SO that, as there never is a moment, in '^ which a Roman Cathohc doubts of the " church, there never is a moment, in *' which he doubts of the divine inspiration " of the scripture, v»hich is a tenet of his " church. But you, who deny the autho- " rity of the church, are driven to the " terrible inconvenience of being obHged to " admit, thatthereisaperiod, during which, " it is in the necessity of things, that the " Christian doubts, or, if you prefer the *' expression, is without the belief of this " fundamental article of faith,^ — the divine " inspiration of the scripture." This was strong reasoning ; but M. Claude rallied. — "This way of reasoning," he shrewdly observed, " must make every " person decide in favour of his own church. " The Greeks, Arminians, ^Ethiopians, even *' we, whom you think so much in the " wrong, are baptized ; by your account, " therefore, all of us actually have the " true faith, the true scriptures, and the " true interpretation of them." Bossuet's acknowledgment of the force of this argument, and of the great impres- sion which it made on the persons, present F 66 at the conference, should be mentioned in his own words. — " A more forcible ob- " jection than M. Claude's could not be '' urged. The answer to it immediately oc- ** curred to me, but I was apprehensive of " not expressing it in a manner to make it '' fully understood. I trembled as I spoke, " for I thouo[ht the salvation of a soul was " at stake ; and I offered a prayer to God, " that, as he made the truth known to me, " he would furnish me with words, that " would enable me to present it, in its full " light, to my hearers. My dispute was with " a man, who listened patiently, expressed " himself with clearness and strensjth, and " was able to avail himself of any thing, " which, the least want of precision, opened " to attack." Such were Bossuet's feelings, as he him- self has expressed them, on M. Claude's ob- servation : the reader probably, is curious to see how he delivered himself from the consequences to which it seemed to lead. He remarked to M. Claude, that the re- formed church was to be distinguished from the Greek, and from all the other churches, which he had mentioned ; as the members of 67 all those churches professed both to receive, at thdr baptism, the faith of the true church, and to believe, with divine faith at their first use of reason, her divine authority : so that, in their own opinion, there never was a moment, in which the members of those churches were without faith in the true church, or faith in her authority, or faith in her scriptures : — while, on the other hand, M. Claude, and all the communicants with his church, admitted it to be an article of their doctrine, that, during all the period w'hich preceded, or was employed in exa- mination, they had not faith in the true church, in her authority, or in her scrip- tures ; and thus, as to the point immedi- ately under discussion, all those churches might be cited against M. Claude. After this preliminary observation. Bos- suet proceeded to consider M. Claude's assertion, that, as the members of all those churches, and also the members of the Huguenot churches were baptized, it neces- sarily followed from Bossuet's own doc- trine, that they continued, while they were members of the church, in w^hich they were baptized, to possess the true faith, the true F 2 68 scriptures, and the true interpretation of them. — This brought the disputants to immediate issue : — Bossuet repHed, that, when a person is baptized, the Holy Ghost confers on him, without regard to the faith of the person w^ho baptizes him, or the church, in which he is baptized, the faith of the church men- tioned in the Apostles' creed ; the faith of the holy Catholic Church: — that the baptized person continues a member of that true church, till the example of his parents, or some other circumstance, seduces him from it. " Thus," said Bossuet, " the mem- bers of the churches, which have been mentioned, and the members of your church, are in error, not on account of an erroneous faith, which they received in baptism, but because they have aban- doned the true faith, ^ — the faith of the holy Catholic Church, which they re- ceived in baptism." This was Bossuet's reply to his adversary's attack : — and the Conference now drew to its conclusion. Both Bossuet and M. Claude published accounts of it ; and, as it generally happens in such cases, their accounts disagreed. 69 On this circumstance, Bossuet expresses himself with great good temper and mode- ration. — " It is not my intention," he says, " to accuse M. Claude of wilful misrepre- " sentation. It is difficult to remember, " with precision, the things which have " been said, or the order in which they " were spoken ; the mind often confounds " things that were spoken, with things that " occurred afterwards ; and thus, without "^ the slightest intentional aberration from " it, truth is often disfigured. — All I say of " M. Claude, he has my leave to say ot " me." This is the language of a Christian and a gentleman. Violence ever injures the cause, which it is intended to support, and often refutes the accusation, in aid of which it is used. F 3 70 CHAP. VIII. bossuet's history of the variations of the protestant churches. 1 HIS is the most considerable, in size, of the Controversial Works of Bossuet. — In the five first books of it, Bossuet gives a succinct account of the rise and first pro- gress of the Reformation in Germany. In the sixth, he professes to expose the con- duct of Luther and Melancthon, in sanction- ing, with other divines of their party, the marriage of the Landgrave of Hesse, with a second wife, during the life of his first wife. The seventh and eighth books are confined to the Reformation in England, during the reigns of Henry the 8th and Edward the 6th. The history of the Re- formation in Germany is resumed in the eighth book ; the ninth gives an account of the rise and first progress of the Calvinists in France ; the tenth is employed gn the Reformation in England, during the 71 reign of Queen Elizabeth, and on the civil wars of France, which he accuses her of fomenting, and which, he affirms, were pro- duced by a leading principle of the early Reformers, that it is lawful for subjects to levy war against their Sovereign, on account of religion. Here, Bossuet breaks off, to give, in his eleventh book, an account of the Albigenses and other sects, who separated from the church of Rome, in the ninth, tenth, eleventh and twelfth centuries, and were said by the Huguenots, to be their religious an- cestors. The twelfth and thirteenth books contain an account of the Huguenots from the period, in v/hich his eighth book left them, till the Synod of Gap. The four- teenth book, contains an account of the disputes between Arminius and Gomar, the wars, more than civil, between the Synods of Dordrecht, Charenton and Geneva ; and the reprobation of them all, by the Hugue- not churches of France. The fifteenth book is of the dogmatical Mnd ; its object is, to shew the divine autho- rity of the church of God ; her marks, and Ihe claims of the church of Rome to thp F4 72 exclusive possession of them. — It should be observed, that, in every part of the Work, with the exception of the eleventh book, in which Bossuet professes to give an ac- count of the predecessors of Luther, he re- lates the events, which are the subjects of his history, in chronological order. Most readers of the present times, will pro- bably think, that the eleventh and fourteenth are the most interesting books of this cele- brated work. A full and impartial history of the irregular attempts at reformation, as they are termed by Dr. Robertson, which are the subject of the eleventh book, has em- ployed several pens in Germany and Hol- land, but has not attracted as much atten- tion, either in France or England, as the subject seems to deserve. Some modern writers have professed to deduce the authors of the tremendous revolution of our times, from the ancient Manichees, through the Knights-Templars, the sectaries of the middle ages, and some of the Reformers of the six- teenth century. In their attempts to establish this system, they have maintained several ex- travagant opinions : but arguments, plausible at least, are not wanting to support its ge- 73 neral probability. — There seems reason to believe, that, after the death of Manes, the European ]\Ianichees retreated, and earned their doctrines with them, into the East; that they made a second appearance in Eu- rope, about the beginning of the ninth cen- tury ; that, under the various appellations of Paulicians, Albigenses, Waldenses, Hus- sites, Bohemians, Bogards, Brethren of the Free Spirit, Wickliffites and Lollards, they and their disciples, during that and the three ensuing centuries, spread themselves over Europe; that they diverged into sects, some of whom were hostile to the con- stituted authorities of the times, both in church and state; and that, after various vicissitudes of fortune, the disciples of some of those sects finally triumphed, in the six- teenth centui-y, in a considerable portion of Europe, and filled it, with disorgan- izing principles, which were never wholly eradicated. The doctrines and adven- tures of these sectaries, from the time of their return to Europe, till the commence- ment of Luther's Reformation, are shortly related by Bossuet. H^re, he is met by many Protestant adversaries ; the ablest of whom, 74 confessedly is, M. James Basnage, who published, in opposition to the ^' Variations," his " History of the Reformed Churches," a learned work ; but which, even in the opi- nion of some writers of his own communion, is not entitled to the praise of impartiaUty. — Bossuet is also opposed by Mosheim ; but both Basnage and Mosheim concede much to him : See the interesting chapter of the latter, on the History of the Anabap- tists or Memnonites, in Doctor IVlaclaine's Translation, vol.4, page 129. The fourteenth book of Bossuet's " History of the Variations" is particularly interesting, as he attempts to shew in it, by much cu- rious and instructive evidence, a natural gravitation of every sect, which separates from the church of Rome, into Socinianism. Some time after Bossuet's " History of the Variations" made its appearance, he pub- lished his six eloquent Addresses to the French Protestants. In the last, he treats, at length, of this supposed Socinian tendency of the Reformation. He proves in it, from the confessions of the celebrated Jurieu, that, before the close of the seventeenth century, Socinianism abounded in the United PrO' 75 vinces; and that the dispersion of the French Huguenots, in consequence of the Edict of Nantes, revealed to the terrified re formers of the original school, the alarming secret of the preponderance of Socinianism, even in the reformed churches of France. The members of them, being, by Jurieu's account, no longer under the control of the civil power, disseminated their Socinian principles, every where, with the greatest activity and success. Even in England, Ju- rieu pretended to discover the effect of their exertions. He mentions, that, in 1 698, thirty- four French refugee ministers, residing in London, addressed a Letter to the Synod, then sitting in Amsterdam, in which they declared that Socinianism spread so rapidly, that, if the Ecclesiastical Assembhes applied no remedy to it, or used only palliatives, the evil would be incurable. — Of these lamen- tations of Jurieu, Bossuet avails himself with the greatest skill : — they brought Jurieu into great disgrace among his own brethren. It has often been observed, that contra- ries meet in their extremes. Two writers more contrary, in every sense of that word, to each other, than Bossuet and the late 76 author of the " Decline and Fall of the Ro^ man Empire," cannot be mentioned : yet, in one of the most cmious passages of that extraordinary work, Mr. Gibbon ado})ts and aggravates all these charges of Bossuet. (See ch. Liv). CHAP. IX. bossuet's personal conduct towards protestants ; — his principles respecting religious toleration. In the general conduct of Bossuet to- wards Protestants, there was nothing to censure, and much to praise. When the Edict of Nantes brought the question of Religious Toleration into discussion, his personal conduct towards the sufferers under that Edict, appears to have been highly commendable. As to his general conduct ; — all Protes- tant writers, who have mentioned it, agree that it was marked with good breeding and moderation ; and, while they allow, that there was warmth and earnestness in 77 his religious disputes with them, confess that he wiUingly admitted equal warmth and earnestness in his Protestant opponents. This is particularly noticed by Saurin, in his Factum against the celebrated Jean Baptiste Rousseau. He mentions in it, that he found Eossuet a rough disputant, but that Bossuet permitted him to be equally rough. A Protestant minister, of great re- putation among his party, mentions Bos- suet in a Letter printed by his Benedictine editors, as a prelate, " whom God had " wonderfully gifted ; and who was held, *' in particular veneration, even by Protest- ^^ ants." — Alluding to a controversial work of his own, the same gentleman mentions, " that the high breeding and Christian man- " ners of Bossuet had greatly contributed " to overcome his repugnance to every " thing which savoured of controversy." " If yoi4 consider with attention," he writes to his correspondent, " what is passing, '' you will find, that Bossuet employs no " means for procuring our conversion, which " are not agreeable to the spirit of the Gos- '' pel. He preaches, composes works, writes ■^ letters, and endeavours by means, worthy 78 " of his character and the true spirit of " Christianity, to make us quit our faith. ^' We should be grateful for the charitable " intentions of the great prelate, and, " without prejudice, examine writings that " evidently come from a heart, which loves *' us and desires our salvation." (Ben. ed. of Bossuet's works. Tom. ix. pp. 429. 490.) In all his controversies with the Protestants, he abstained from personalities, injurious language and insult. — " With the strictest " truth," these are his expressions in a ser- mon preached by him, on the religious pro- fessions of a young lady, recently converted to the catholic religion, — •" With the strictest " truth, I can declare, that the most tender " desire of my heart, the most ardent of " my daily prayers, is the Salvation of our " separated brethren. I am touched to " my very soul, when I behold persons " so honourable^ mid, as God well kjioxvs, so " loved and revered by me, walking in dark- " ness. — I trust that I shall always express " myself in such a manner, as will give my " arguments, (all which shall ever be drawn " from the scriptures, and the holy fathers, '^ the best interpreters of the scriptures), 79 '^ their full weight, without using an in- " jurious expression." The revocation of the Edict of Nantes, brought Bossuet's principles on Religious Liberty to the test. — The persecution of the Huguenots, which followed, (called from the dragoon troops employed in it, the Dra- gonade) — was condemned by the greatest and best men in France. M. d'Aguesseau, the father of the celebrated chancellor, resigned his office of Intendant of Langue- doc, rather than be a witness of it : his son repeatedly mentions it with abhorrence. Fenelon, Flechier and Bossuet, confessedly the ornaments of the Gallican Church, lamented it. To the utmost of their power, they prevented the execution of the edict, and softened its severities, when they could not prevent them. This practical condemnation of the resort to temporal power, in effecting religious conversion, does all these illustrious charac- ters the greater honour, as the doctrine of religious toleration was, at that time, little understood. It is painful to add, that, in a studied letter, written to M. de Basville, Intendant of Languedoc, (Ben. ed. vol. x. 8o p. 293), Bossuet seems to admit, in theory, the general right of christian princes, to en- force acts of religious conformity, by whole- some severities ; and thus allows them, for effecting a spiritual good, a resort to tem- poral means, which the Divine Founder of our faith so explicitly disclaimed for him- self. Nothing, surely, can be more contrary than such a proceeding, to the precept of the Prince of the Apostles, (1 Ep. c. 3. v. 2.) which recommends " the leading of the fold " of Christ to their pastures, according to " the order established by God himself, " that is, voluntarily, and never by com- " pulsion/' 81 CHAP. X. THE CORRESPONDENCE OF Bt)SSUET AND LEIBNIZ, ON THE REUNION OF THE LUTHERAN PROTESTANTS, To THE ROMAN-CATHOLIC CHURCH. Ihis correspondence forms one of the most interesting events in the Hfe of Bossuet ; and the letters, of which it consists, and the other written documents, which relate to it, are highly interesting- The writer will attempt to present the reader with a short account, i st, of the circumstances which led to this correspondence; 2dly, of the project of Re-union, deUvered by JVIolanus, a Lu- theran divine, and Bossuet's sentiments on that project; 3dly, of the intervention of Leibniz in the negotiation; and, 4thly, of the project suggested by Bossuet, and the principal reasons, by which he contended for its reception. 1st, It appears that, towards the seven- teenth century, the emperor Leopold, and several sovereign princes in Germany, con- ceived a project of re- uniting the Roman G 82 Catholic and Lutheran churches. The duke of Brunswick, who had recently em- braced the Roman Cathohc religion, and published his " Fifty Reasons" for his conver- sion, (once a popular work of controversy), and the duke of Hanover, the father of the first prince of the illustrious house, which now fills the throne of England, were the original promoters of the attempt. It was generally approved; and the mention of it at the Diet of the Empire, was favourably received. Some communications upon it took place, between the emperor and the ducal princes : and with all their knowledge, several conferences were held, upon the subject, between certain distinguished Ro- man-Cathohc and Protestant divines. In these, the bishop of Neustadt, and Molanus the abbot of Lokkum, took the lead. The first had been consecrated bishop of Tina in Bosnia, then under the dominion of the Turks, with ordinary jurisdiction over some parts of the Turkish territories. His con- duct had recommended him to Innocent the 11th, and that pope had directed him to visit the Protestant states in Germany, and inform him of their actual dispositions, 83 in respect to the Church of Rome. In consequence of this mission, he became known to the emperor, who appointed him to the see of Neustadt, in the neighbour- hood of Vienna. Molanus was Director of the Protestant Churches and Consistories of Hanover. Both of them were admirably calculated for the office intended for them on this occasion. Each possessed the con- fidence of his own party, and was esteemed by the other: each was profoundly versed in the matters in dispute; each possessed good sense, moderation, and conciliating manners, and each had the success of the business at heart, and a fixed purpose, that nothing, but a real difference on some essential article of doctrine, should frustrate the project. The effect of the first conferences was so promising, that the Emperor and the two princes resolved, that they should be con- ducted in a manner more regular, and more likely to bring the object of them to a con- clusion. With this view, the business was formally intrusted, by both the princes, to Molanus alone ; and the Emperor published a rescript, dated the 20th March 1691, by G 2 84 which, he gave the bishop of Neustadt, full authority to treat, on all matters of religion, with the states, communities, and individuals of the empire; reserving to the ecclesiastical and imperial powers, their right to confirm the acts of the bishop, as they should judge advisable. Under these auspicious cir- cumstances, the conference between the bishop of Neustadt and Molanus began. But, before the events, which we have mentioned, took place, a correspondence, on the subject of a general re-union between Ca- tholics and Protestants, had been carried on for some time, between Pelisson and Leibniz. The former held a considerable rank amon^ the French writers, who illustrated the reign of Lewis the fourteenth; the latter was eminently distinguished in the literary world. In the exact sciences, he was inferior to Newton alone; in metaphysics, he had no superior; in general learning, he had scarcely a rival. He had recommended liimself to the Brunswick family, by three volumes, which he had recently published, on the antiquities of that illustrious house; and was then engaged in the investigation of its Italian descent, and early German shoots. 85 The result of it, under the title of Ormnes Guelphicce, was published after his decease, by Scheidius, and is considered to be a per- fect model of genealogical history. He was also thoroughly conversant in the theological disputes of the times; and, in all the ques- tions of dogma or history, which enter into them. His correspondence with Pelisson, came to the knowledge of Louisa, princess Pala- tine and abbess of ^faubrusson. She was a daughter of Frederick, the elector and count Palatine of the Rhine, and a sister of the dutchess of Hanover. In early life, she had been converted to the Roman Catholic religion, and had the conversion of her sister very much at heart. With this view, she sent to her, the correspondence between Leibniz and Pelisson, and received from her, an account of what w^as passing between the bishop of Neustadt and Mo- lanus. Both the ladies were anxious to promote the measure, and that Bossuet should take in it, the leading part, on the side of the Catholics. This was mentioned to Lewis the fourteenth, and had his ap- probation. The Emperor and both tiie G 3 86 princes, by all of whom Bossuet was per- sonally esteemed, equally approved of it; and it was finally settled, that Bossuet and Leibniz should be joined to the bishop of Neustadt and Molanus, and that the corre- spondence with Bossuet, should pass through the hands of madame de Brinon, who acted as secretary to the abbess of Maubrusson, and is celebrated, by the writers of the times, for her wit and dexterity in business. Thus the matter assumed a still more regu- lar form, and much was expected from the acknowledged talents, learning, and modera- tion of the actors in it, and their patrons. 2. The conferences between the bishop of Neustadt and Molanus, continued for seven months, and ended in their agreeing on twelve articles, to sei^e for the basis of the discussion, on the terms of the re-union. The bishop of Neustadt communi- cated these articles to Bossuet. He seems to have approved of them generally, but to have thought, that some alteration in them was advisable. This being mentioned to Molanus, he published his Cogitatmies Pmat(2, a profound and conciliating dis- sertation. Without entering into any dis- 87 cussion, on the points in dispute between the churches, he suggested in it, a kind of truce, during which, there should be eccle- siastical communion between them : the Lutherans were to acknowledge the pope, as the first of bishops in order and dignity : the Church of Rome was to receive the Lutherans, as her children, without exacting from them, any retractation of their alleged errors, or any renunciation of the articles in their creed, condemned by the Council of Trent. The anathemas of that council were to be suspended, and a general council was to be convened, in which, the Protestants were to have a deliberative voice : the sentence of that council was to be definitive, and, in the mean time, the members of each party were to treat the members of the other as brethren, whose errors, however great they might appear, were to be tolerated from motives of peace, and in consideration of their engagements to abandon them, if the council should pronounce against them. To shew the probability of a final accommo- dation, Molanus notices in his Dissertation, several points, in which, one party imputed to the other, errors not justly chargeable on G4 88 them ; several, on which they disputed merely for want of rightly understanding each other; and several, in which the dispute was of words only. It appears that the bishop of Neustadt communicated this dissertation to Bossuet, and that Bossuet was delighted with the good sense, candour, and true spirit of con- ciliation which it displayed. He frequently, and always in terms of the highest praise, mentions its author in his letters. His own language was equally moderate and con- ciliating. " The Council of Trent," he says in one of his letters," is our stay ; — but we " shall not use it to prejudice the cause. " This would be to take for granted, what " is in dispute between us. We shall deal " more fairly with our opponents. We " shall make the council serve for a state- " ment and explanation of our doctrines. " Thus, we shall come to an explanation on '■ those points, in which either of us imputes " to the other, what he does not believe, ^' and in which we dispute only because we " misconceive each other. This may lead *' us far ; for the abbot of Lohkum has ^^ actually conciliated the points so essential^ 89 " of Justyication and the Eucharist : nothing " is wanting to him, on that side, but that ^' he should be avoxved. Why should ice not " hope to conclude, in the same manner, dis- " putes less difficult and of less importance 9 " Cela se pent pousser si avant, que M, " Vabbe de Lokkum a concilie actuellement " les points si essentiels de la Justification et " da sacrifice de fEucharistie, et il ne lid " manque de ce cote la, que de se faire '^ avouer. Pourquoi ne pas esperer defnir ''' par les memes moyens des disputes moins " difficiles et moins import antes ? " With these rational and conciHatory dis- positions, Bossuet and Molanus proceeded. But, after this stage of the business, Molanus disappears, and Leibniz comes on the scene. 3. A letter, written by Bossuet to M. de Brinon, having been communicated by her to Leibniz, opened the correspondence be- tween him and Bossuet. In that letter, Bossuet declared explicitly, that the Church of Rome was ready to make concessions on points of discipline, and to explain doc- trhies, but would make no concession in respect to defined articles of faith ; and, in particular, would make no such concession, 90 in respect to any, which had been defined by the Council of Trent. Leibniz's letter to M. de Brinon, in answer to this com- munication, is very important. He ex- presses himself in these terms : " The bishop " of Meaux says, 1st, That the project " delivered to the Bishop of Neustadt, " does not appear to him quite sufficient ; " 2dly, That it is nevertheless very useful, " as every thing must have its beginning ; '' 3dly, That Rome will never relax from " any point of doctrine, defined by the " church, and cannot capitulate, in respect " to any such article; 4thly, That the " doctrine, defined in the Council of Trent, " is received in and out of France by all " Roman Catholics; 5thly, That satisfac- " tion may be given to Protestants, in " respect to certain points of discipline, or " in the way of explanation, and that this " had been already done in an useful man- " ner, in some points, mentioned in the " project of the bishop of Neustadt. " These are the material propositions in " the letter of the bishop of Meaux, and " I believe all these propositions true. " Neither the bishop of Neustadt, nor 9* * those who negotiated with them, make ' any opposition to them. There is nothing ' in them, which is not conformable to the ' sentiments of tliose persons. The third ' of them in particular, which might be ' thought an obstacle to these Projects of ' Accommodation, could not be unknown ^ to them ; one may even say that they ' built on it." It seems difficult to deny, that, in this stage of the business, much had been gained to the cause of re-union. The parties were come to a complete understanding on the important articles of Justification, and the Eucharist; and it was admitted both by Leibniz and Molanus, that, in their view of the concern, an accommodation might be effected between the Roman Catholic and Lutheran Churches, though the former retained all her defined doctrines, and, in particular, all her doctrines defined by the Council of Trent. The question then was, what should be done in respect to the re- maining articles in diflTerence between the churches. It is to be wished that it had been left to Bossuet and Molanus to settle them, in the way of amicable explanation, 92 in which, they had settled the two important articles, which we have mentioned. It is evident, from the passages, which we have cited from Bossuet, — that it was his wish that the business should proceed on that plan, — and that he had hopes of its success. Unfortunately, the business took another direction: Leibniz proclaimed, that, after every possible explanation should be given, the Lutheran church w^ould still retain some articles, contrary to the defined doctrines ■of the Church of Rome, and anathematized by the Council of Trent. To remove the iinal effect of this objection, Leibniz held out Molanus's first project, that the Luthe- rans should express a general acquiescence in the authority of the church, and promise obedience to the decisions of a general council, to be called for the purpose of pronouncing on these points ; and that, in consequence of these advances on their part, the anathemas of the Council of Trent should be suspended, and the Luthe- rans received, provisionally, within the pale of the Catholic Church. To bring over Bossuet to this plan, he exerted great elo-