i i Shelf PRINCETON, N. J. 1 1 Division X^T^.Cf. i^PO Section .'..R.^S.i... ■ Number ^^'Ml^ THE EPISTLE APOSTLE PAUL TO THE ROMANS WITH NOTES, CHIEFLY EXPLANATORY. DESIGNED A8 AN ACCOMPANBIENT TO THE AUTHOR'S NOTES ON THE GOSPELS AND THE ACTS. • BY HENRY J. RIPLEY, NEWTON THEOLOGICAL INSTITUTION. BOSTON: aOIJLD AND LINCOLN S 9 W A S H I X (i T \ STREET. NEW YORK: SHELDON. BLAKEM AN & CO. CINCINNATI : GEORGE S. BLANCHARD. 1859. Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1857, by GOULD AND LINCOLN, In the Clerk's Office of the Disti'ict Court of the District of Massachusetts. Stereotyped by W. F. DRAPER, ANDOVER, MASS. Printed by GEO. C. RAND & AVEHY, BOSTON. P R ETA C E The present volume has for its purpose the elucidation of the phraseology and reasoning of the Epistle to the Komans. My aim has been, to aid readers in correctly apprehending the Apostle's thoughts, not stopping short of a full exhibition of his meaning and not going beyond his meaning. I have sought definitely to express my own views, the result of a long-continued and earnest study of the epistle, during which I have, of course, welcomed help from others, but have endeavored to keep myself from subjection to them. My plan did not require me to detail the grammatical and exegetical processes which conducted to the results ; nor to introduce the opinions of others for the purpose of refuting them, or of sustaining my own. I regard it a better service, simply and definitely to present what I consider the Apostle's ideas. Though the Notes are adapted to our common English version, yet in reality the original epistle is their basis ; and I trust they will be found useful to theological students and ministers of the gospel, as well as to others. As the epistle is mostly a connected course of thought, it ought to be studied, not in detached and widely distant portions, but (iU) rV PREFACE. continuously from the beginning onward, so that the attitude of the writer's mind may be discovered and the reader may place himself in the same position ; and thus the early portions may make the subsequent ones more intelligible. Passages separated from their connection and examined without reference to points which have been previously established, or without reference to the author's design and circumstances, are easily misunderstood and may even appear inexplicable ; while difficulties may be sur- mounted, with a good degree of satisfaction, by one who reads in connection, and who discerns the relation of one part, or topic, to another. To aid the reader in observing the continuity of thought in the epistle, and the transitions to related thoughts, I have advised its being printed here, not according to the customary and arbitrary division into verses, but by paragraphs. For the convenience, however, of notes and of reference, the figures, which in ordi- nary editions designate the verses, are retained on the side of the page. I have also placed at the head of each chapter, a mention, in the form of an analysis, of the topics occupying its several paragraphs. Those who are acquainted with my Notes on the Gospels, and on the Acts of the Apostles, will discover a general conformity in the present work to the design and principles of those volumes. H. J. R. INTRODUCTION Origin of the Roman Church. The origin of the church in Rome is hid in obscurity. In the ab- sence of all reliable historical information, we can readily believe that, soon after the events of the day of Pentecost, as related in the second chapter of the Acts, Christians would be found in the great capital of the Roman empire, which had so active a connection, both political and commercial, with all parts of the known world. Many of its cit- izens could not fail, in their journeys for business, to become acquainted with the gospel ; and some, doubtless, both Gentiles and Jews, became true converts, who would, on their return, seek to promote in their own city the religion of Christ. Various occasions would, also, lead to Rome, both for temporary and for stated residence, persons who had become Christians. Preachers of the gospel, too, doubtless found their way to the imperial city. Through these and similar concurring circumstances, a church was soon formed, consisting, like the other early churches, of converted Gentiles and Jews. The Apostle's Acquaintance with the Christians at Eome. At the time of writing this epistle, Paul had not been at Rome, though he had for many years cherished the desire to visit the church there and to strengthen its interests. Seel: 10-13. 15: 22-24, 28, 29. The importance of this church, as situated in the capital of the world, and thus having a wide influence on Christian affairs, suffi- • ■- (v) VI INTRODUCTION. ciently accounts for this desire : but, besides, he was personally acquainted with not a few of its members, as appears from the 16th chapter, having met with them in his various journeys ; some of them were his own relatives, 16 : 7, 11 ; some of them had shared with him in labors and privations for the gospel's sake, 16 : 7, 9 ; and from some he had received many attentions, 16: 6, 13. Having been thus far prevented from visiting them by the demand for his services in regions where the gospel had not yet been made known, 1 : 13. 15 : 22, he availed himself of a favorable opportunity for writing to them. He knew sufficiently the affairs of the church ; by current report, doubt- less, as to some things ; as to others, we may well believe, by informa- tion from members with whom he had met in various places, and from preachers who were personally acquainted with its condition. Main Purpose of the Epistle. The epistle is a connected discourse. It presents and establishes the distinguishing doctrine of the gospel in reference to the salvation of men, particularly in view of the objections and difficulties which Jews would be likely to feel. The distinctive feature of the gospel is stated in 1 : 17; namely, it discloses the righteousness which avails for men's acceptance with God, the righteousness which comes from faith. The statement there made is, so to speak, the main theme of discourse, in reference both to men's present acceptance with God and their be- coming prepared, through personal holiness, for heaven. The first eight chapters are devoted to this subject. Analysis of the first eight Chapters. The apostle shows, in the first place, the need of salvation, in respect both to Gentiles and Jews, in consequence of the exposure of all alike to divine wrath on account of sin, 1 : 18 to 3 : 20 ; and then, as all are sinners and none can be saved by virtue of their own deeds, he presents faith in the propitiatory death of Christ as required alike from all, and as that which will be accepted as righteousness and will avail for justification in the sight of God, 3 : 21-30. As meeting the queries of a Jewish mind at this point, he affirms that this mode of jus- tifying men does not invalidate the law as exhibited by Moses ; that, on the contrary, it establishes the law ; and that the 014 Testament INTRODUCTION. VH presents essentially the same principle of acceptance with God, 3 : 31 to 4: 25. The happy cousequences of this justifying faith are next presented, 5 : 1-1 1 ; and a contrast is drawn between Adam, through whom sin and death came, and Christ, through whom come righteousness and life, 5: 12-21. The principle, that faith is put to a person's account as righteous- ness, illustrative as it is of the grace, or loving favor, of God, is next viewed in its relation to the holiness of a beUever. Faith in Christ, so far from allowing sin, makes its possessor dead to sin through his participation in the death of Christ, or through his union with Christ in respect to his death, 6 : 1-14. The believer is no longer under the law, the requisitions of which prove an occasion of excitement to sin : he now serves God, having a new spirit towards him and standing in a new relation to him, 6 : 15 to 7 : 1-6. The apostle then portrays the influence of the divine law on the human soul, when a man is viewed aside from the gracious provision which faith in Christ secures. The law of God, though in itself holy and good, yet when brought into contact with the human soul, awakens a distressing sense of sinfulness and of criminal inability to obey it. In- stead of securing obedience, the law, though it commends itself to the reason and conscience, as just and good, awakens and stimulates in the human soul sinful desires, and can produce only a sense of sinful- ness and danger, 7 : 7-24. Deliverance from this misery can come only through Christ, 7 : 25. Faith in Christ delivers from this bondage to sin ; because to the believer in Christ the Spirit of God imparts life ; the believer is a child of God, enjoying his paternal treatment and the hope of partaking in the glory of Christ ; a hope which is sure, having its foundation in the eternal purpose and unchanging love of God, 8: 1-39. Rejection of the Jews. Since it is by faith in Christ, and not through the Mosaic law, that men can be accounted as righteous in the sight of God, the Jews, re- fusing to believe in him, are rejected. This inevitable result could not but be painful to the Christian Jews ; and it needed explanation, as being apparently inconsistent with the promises of God. To relieve Vm INTRODUCTION. this difficulty and vindicate the divine conduct towards the nation, the apostle next takes up the subject of the Jews' rejection and devotes to it the 9th, 10th and 11th chapters. Analysis op Chapters 9, 10, 11. After avowing his grief at the sad condition of the Jews, 9 . 1-5, the apostle repels the supposition that God had failed to fulfil his promise. God's promise remains true : in its fulfilment, however, he acts, not on the principle that any men have, or can acquire, a ground for claiming blessings from him, as though deserving them, but according to his own free designs and grace, 9 : 6-29. The fault lay in the unbelief of the Jews themselves, 9 : 30. 10 : 1-21. Grounds for consolation are next presented : namely, it is only a part of the Jews that are rejected ; their rejection has proved favora- ble, and will yet prove favorable to the Gentiles ; their recovery is, also, to be expected, 11 : 1-32. Hortatory Skction, and Conclusion ob- the Epistle. Then follows the hortatory part of the epistle, 12: ltol5: 13, con- taining exhortations adapted, in part, to all Christians, and specially appropriate, in part, to the Christians in Rome. The remainder of the epistle, from 15 : 14, Is occupied with expres- sions of the apostle's kind feelings towards the Roman church, with salutations to numerous individuals, and with other kindred matter. The whole ends with an ascription of glory to God. Time and Place ob* Writing the Epistle. The epistle was written, probably, in the year 58 or 59, while the apostle was on his way to Jerusalem, 15 : 25, with a contribution from the Gentile Christians in Macedonia and Achaia for the indigent among the Christians in Jerusalem. From the commendation which it contains, 16: 1, of Phebe of Cenehrea, since this place was a sea-port of Corinth, and from the mention of Gains, a member of the church in Corinth (1 Cor. 1:4), as the apostle's host, 16 : 23, it Is sufficiently clear that the epistle was sent from Corinth, and conveyed by Phebe, THE EPISTLE OF PAUL TO THE ROMANS. CHAPTER I. Opening salutation, 1-7. Gratitude to God for the steadfastness of the Roman Christians, and desire to visit them, together with a statement of the essential principle of the gospel, 8-17. Sinfulness and condemnation of the Gentiles, 18-33. 1 Paul, a servant of Jesus Christ, called to he an apostle, sep- 2 arated unto the gospel of God, (which he had promised afore CHAPTER I. After an opening salutation, vs. 1- 7, and the exi^ression of desir-e to be- come personally acquainted with the Christians at Rome, 8-15, the apos- tle avows his sense of the glory of the gospel, and states its essential and distinctive principle, 16, 17, thus proposing the main subject of the epistle. As the first step in the ti-eatment of his subject, he exposes the sinfulness and consequent con- demnation of the Gentiles, 18-32. 1-7. The first seven verses are an introductory paragraph, containing the apostle's opening salutation to the Roman Christians collectively, an assertion of his call to the apostleship among the Gentiles, and an avowal of Jesus Christ as the Son of God. 1. A servant of Jesus Christ. This expression might designate a person either as a follower of Christ, a Christian, as in Eph. 6 : 6, or as sustaining some official relation to Christ, in the same manner as the ancient prophets were called servants of Jehovah. The latter is the mean- ing here intended. The expression is a general one, not indicating the particular kind of service to which the writer had been called : the kind of service is indicated in the next clause. II Called to be an apostle: or, a called apostle; that is, an apostle called to oflice by Christ ; 1 Cor. 1 : 1 . It was important to mention the fact of his having been called to the apostleship, since that placed him on an equality Avith the other acknowl- edged apostles who had been speci- ally called by Christ to their office. Like them, he Avas a called apostle, appointed, not by any human author- ity, but by Christ ; not impelled sim- ply by his own desires, but by divine influence. Compare 1 Cor. 1:1. 2 Cor. 1:1. Gal. 1:1. ll Separated unto the gospel of God; set apart to the work of making known the gos- pel. Reference is had either to the historical date of his conversion, when he was instructed by Christ to become an apostle, as in Acts 26 : 15-18, compare Acts 13: 2, or to the original purpose of God concern- ing him, as in Gal. 1: 15. — The etymological signification of the word gospel is here retained : it not only signifies a particular system of (9) 10 ROMANS, 3 bj his prophets in the holy scriptures,) concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord, — which was made of the seed of David 4 according to the iiesh ; and declared to he the Son of God with power according to the spirit of holiness, by the resurrection genealogy of Jesus, Matt. 1 : 1-16. Luke 3 : 23-38, show him to have descended from the royal house of David. In reference to this view of Christ as a man, descended from David, see Matt. 2:5. 22 : 41-46. Kom. 9:5. Gal. 4 : 4. 4. And declared to he the Son of God. The word declare formerly meant to make clear. Tliis suffi- ciently well corresponds to the orig- inal term, which signifies marked out, designated. In addition to the view of Christ presented in the preceding verse, he is the Son of God, partak- ing of the divine natui-e. 1| With power; powerfully, with convincing evidence. He is, in a powerful man- ner, with convincing evidence, set forth as the Son of God. || Accord- ing to the spirit of lioliness. It is not the Holy Spirit, personally, that is here meant ; but, in contrast with the flesh, mentioned in the preceding verse, that spiritual holy nature by which Christ was distinguished from men and was so worthy of venera- tion. Compare 1 Pet. 3 : 18. — Thus a twofold view of Christ is here pre- sented : one, in reference to his human descent, as the son of David : the other, in reference to his pre-ex- isting spiritual and holy nature which distinguished him as the Son of God. Compare John 1 : 1-3. 17:5. 2 Cor. 4 : 4. Phil. 2 : 6, 7. Col. 1 : 15, 16. Heb. 1 : 3. This spiritual nature is here characterized as holy, probably in conti'ast with the sinful- ness of men, whose nature Christ assumed, and as a ground for ador- ing veneration. || By the resurrection from the dead. Our Lord's resun-ec- tion from the dead was the specially powerful, convincing, evidence that he was what he claimed to be, the Son of God. His prediction that he should be delivered up to death and be raised fix)m the dead, Luke 18 : religion, but also denominates this as the joyful announcement, the glad tidings, which God has communi- cated concerning his Son our Saviour. Paul here represents himself as divinely set apart to the special work of widely making known this jo}"ful message from God, of explaining and inculcating the doctrines of the gospel, particularly the doctrine of faith in Christ as the appointed medium of our salvation. 2. Which he had jJromised afore by his prophets, etc. Reference is here made to the ancient prophecies concerning the Alessiah which are scattered throughout the scriptures of the Old Testament. — Thus, in his introductory paragraph, Paul brings distinctly to view one of the chief arguments for the truth and divinity of the gospel : God's own prophets, specially instructed by him, had uttered, in great variety, predic- tions concerning a Saviour and the new order of things which he would introduce for the salvation of men ; and these predictions had received their fulfilment in Christ and his religion. — As specimens of the man- ner in which this argument was per- petually employed ^by the apostles, see Acts 2: 22-36. 10: 43. 13: 29-41. 3. Concerning his Son ; more cor- rectly, his own Son; his Son in a peculiar sense. The joyful message in the gospel, promised by God in former ages, had respect to his own Son, by whose advent, life and death, the promised scheme of redemption was consummated. || Which was made of the seed of David according to the flesh; who, according to his fleshly, or human nature, Avas born from the posterity of David : as to his human nature, he Avas a descend- ant of David. So the evangelists, Matthew and Xuke, in giving the CHAPTER I. H 5 from the dead : by whom we have received grace and apostle- 6 ship, for obedience to the faith among all nations, for his 7 name : among whom are ye also, the called of Jesus Christ : — to all that be in Rome, beloved of God, called to he saints : Grace to you, and peace from God our Father, and the Lord Jesus Christ. 33, was exactly fulfilled. This argu- ment was repeatedly employed by the apostles, as satisfactory and com- plete confiniiation of his being the Son of God and the Messiah. See Acts 2 : 30-32. 13 : 29-38. 1 Cor. 15: 4, 14, 17. The resurrection of Christ from the dead was so mani- festly a work of God, that its attesta- tion to the truth of our Lordr's claims was irresistible. 5. By whom ice have received. Paul, though using the plural num- ber, is here speaking of himself, since he is making grateful acknowledg- ment of the high service to which he had been called. || Grace: not so much the grace, or favor, of God, by which he liad received pardon and all personal spiritual good, as that favor, or kindness, by which he had been selected and qualified for the public service of Christ. Compare 12:3. 15: 15. Eph. 3: 2, 8. || Apostle- ship. The special design of this grace is now exhibited, as selecting and qualifying him to be an apostle of Christ,' to publish and vindicate the principles of his religion. || For obedience to the faith; or, for obedi- ence to faith. The purpose for which the apostle was called to his office was, that he might bring men to obey the religion of the gospel, in which faith is a cardinal principle, in distinction fi-om works, or the per- formance of religious deeds, as a medium of salvation. In truly re- ceiving the gospel, men render obe- dience to faith, since faith is the in- dispensable requisite to its blessings. II Among all nations ; among all the Gentiles as well as among the Jews. Obedience to faith, or to the requisi- tion of faith in Christ fo : salvation, was to be accomplished among all nations. || For his name; in behalf of his name : that he might be uni- versally known and acknoAvledged, and that due honor might be every- where rendered to him. 6. The called of Jesus Christ; those who have been called to be dis- ciples of Christ and to partake of the blessings which he bestows. As this calling to the blessings of the gospel is usually ascribed to God the Father, the Eoman Christians may here be spoken of as those who have been called of God to a participation in the blessings which Jesus Christ be- stows. The calling, frequently men- tioned in the New Testament, in- volves also, generally, the idea of an acceptance of the invitation, so that the invited are also actually the par- takers of the ofrered blessings, the called are the chosen. Sometimes a distinction is made between the called and ^Ae chosen; as in Matt. 20 : 16; usually, however, as in Rom. 8 : 30, the calling is of that effectual charac- ter wliich includes the idea of being chosen and of being actually admitted to the possession of the blessings pro- posed. — A large number of the Roman Christians were converted Gentiles. 7. To all that be in Rome, beloved, etc. ; more exactly according to the original. To all the beloved ones of God that are in Rome, his called saints, jj Beloved of God; regarded with love by him as disciples of his Son; hence, regarded as Christians in a state of reconciliation with God. II Called to be saints. The word saints is a designation of Christians : Christians are God's called saints, those whom he has called to holi- ness. Compare Eph. 1 : 4. The de- sign for wliich the religion of Christ 12 ROMANS 8 First, I thank my God through Jesus Christ for you all, that was established and for which his followers Avere called of God is here expressed : namely, that they might be holy and devoted to God. The term saints is not a mere appellation transfeiTcd from the Jews to the Christians ; for not external and cer- emonial holiness is here signified, but real purity of character, such as the gospel enjoins and cultivates. The Jews anciently, as being the chosen people of God, were called a holy people. Nam. 16: 3. Deut. 7:6; they were distinct from other nations as to idolatry and various moral cor- ruptions and were required, as being the professed people of God, to be truly holy. Lev. 11 : 44. 19: 2. 20: 7, 8. This word, holy or saints, was particularly applicable to the people of Christ, as the gospel is eminently a religion of the heai-t. Since the gospel thus primarily and eminently required holiness as the chief dis- criminating element between those who embraced it and others, all who professed to adopt it might be appro- priately addressed as saints, or holy persons, since it might be assumed in writing to a company of avowed Christians that they were what they professed to be. || Grace to you and peace: the Christian form of saluta- tion, frequently occumng in the epis- tles of Paul, both at the opening and at the close. It acknowledges the grace, or favor, of God as the source of all spiritual good ; peace here be- ing that blessed state of well-being which is designed for the followers of Christ and which results from God's gracious disposition towards them. — A usual form of salutation among the ancient Hebrews was, Peace be with you. In the apostle's use and genei-ally among Christians, it had of course a deeper signification than when employed in ordinary life, as it related to spiritual well-being and acknowledged the divine source of such a blessing. Compare John 20: 19, 21, 26.— A customary form of salutation among the Greeks in their epistles was a word correspond- ing to the term, greeting, or, joy he to you. This occurs but twice in the New Testament; namely. Acts 15: 23, and James 11. It Avas not universally employed among the Greeks; and seems to have been generally laid aside among the Chris- tians, since they preferred a form of expression Avhich distinctly acknowl- edged the true God and Jesus Christ, divine grace as the source of good, and the blessed condition in which the Lord Jesus places his followers. II From God our Father; as the giver of all good. II The Lord Jesus Christ; as the Mediator, through whom the kindness of God bestows all spiritual good. 8-17. Before entering on the main subject of the epistle, Paul expresses his gratitude to God for the well- knoAvn steadfastness of the Roman Christians, his interest in their spir- itual Avelfare, his desire to visit Rome in order that he might be useful to them by his personal ministry, his disappointment in not haAang yet been able to gratify this desire, and his sense of obligation to make known the gospel as Avidely as possi- ble, since it discloses the righteous- ness which God has prescribed for men's being justified in his sight. He is thus led to intimate the great topic of the epistle. This may be stated as a reply to the question, HoAv shall man be just with God? by works of his OAvn, or by faith ? Not by his OAvn AA'orks, but by faith. — This paragraph Avas avcU fitted to attract attention, to excite and strengthen the Romans' fraternal feelings toAvards the Avriter, to aAvak- en interest in the subsequent discus- sion, and to promote their readiness to receive his views. 8. First; that is, as the first thing: as if the writer had said, Before en- tering on the main design of my epis- tle, let me express my gratitude to CHAPTER I. IB 9 your faith is spoken of throughout the whole world. For God is my witness, whom I serve with my spirit in the gospel of his Son, that without ceasing I make mention of you always 10 in my prayers ; making request, if by any means now at God, etc. A coiTesponding word in subsequent verses, such as secondly, or next, is not, therefore, requisite. The apostle here writes in the free epistolaiy style which does not re- quire the formality of elaborate and exact composition. || My God : Him to whom eminently I belong, whose servant in proclaiming the gospel which you liave received I avow myself. || Through Jesus Christ; the Mediator, in whose name I give thanks to God and through whom the great blessing, for which I give thanks, namely, faith in the gospel, has been confeiTed on you. II For you all; in behalf of you all. II 2'' hat your faith is spoken of, etc. ; that your faith in Clunst and your steadfast discipleship to him are everywhere spoken of. Not only the personal Christian character of the Roman believers was a ground of gratitude to the apostle, but also the wide-spread influence of their example, as decided followers of Christ. — Rome was, at that time, the great central city, or capital, of the known Avorld. What took place at Rome was soon known through- out the empire which comprised al- most the entire known world. The religion of Christ, which could not but create a sensation in an idola- trous city, would become, when planted in this great capital, very widely known hy the connection, political, commercial, literary and religious, of this city with all parts of the empire. It was indeed a ground for gratitude that the Chiis- tians at Rome were univcrsally known as steadfast belicvei's in Christ. II Throughout the ichole world, a hyperbolical expression, equivalent to everywhere in our ordinary conver- oation ; not, of course, to bo under- stood with literal exactness, but sig- nifying very extensively, or all over the Roman empire. 9. The gratitude which the apos- tle expressed was necessarily asso- ciated with an interest in the spirit- ual welfare of the Roman Christians. This interest seems to be the ground of the present verse. Fur God is my witness, whom I serve, etc. ; for the sincerity of my interest in you I appeal to the all-knowing God who has called me to serve him. — The original word here rendered serve shows that the service referred to is not a general obedience to God in all cii-cumstances, but the service of God in religious matters specifically. The apostle conceives of himself here as set apart to the public duties of re- ligion; and his official servdce he renders in laboring for the extension of the gospel. To him who brought him into this official relation he ap- peals for the truth of his professed interest in the spiritual well-being of the Roman Christians. || With my spirit. The sincerity of the apostle's service of God is here intimated ; it was not an external heartless routine of observances, but a service in which his soul was truly engaged; not a blind, but an intelligent service ; not of constraint, but willingly. || In the gospel of his Son. The particular service rendered was the publishing and vindicating of the gospel. || That without ceasing I make mention of you; that I bear you in mind unceasingly, as objects of prayer to God. See Phil. 1:3. 1 Thess. I : 2. Com- pare Phil. 1 : 7, 8. || Always in my prayers. This clause would be bet- ter placed at the commencement of the following verse, so that we might read thus — Always in my prayers making request, etc. 10. If by any means, etc. ; if by any means I may succeed, by th« u ROMANS. length I might have a prosperous journey by the will of God 11 to come unto you. For I long to see you, that I may impart unto you some spiritual gift, to the end ye may be estab- 12 lished: that is, that I may be comforted together with you, 13 by the mutual faith both of you and me. Now I would not have you ignorant, brethren, that oftentimes I purposed to come unto you (but was let hitherto) that I might have some 14 fruit among you also, even as among other Gentiles. I am debtor both to the Greeks, and to the Barbarians, both to the will of God, in my purpose to come to you. 11. For I long to see you. His constant remembrance of them and prayers for them proceeded from an earnest desire to see them and con- tribute to their spiritual good. II Some spiritual gift ; some gift of a spiritual character, adapted to benefit your souls, and corresponding to the new temper whicli the Holy Spirit has imparted. Tlie apostle wished to increase their Christian knowl- edge, and strengthen their purposes and hopes. — It is not necessary to suppose that he meant by spiritual gift any miraculous endowment, but, as would appear from the next verse, the gift of knowledge and of confir- mation in Christian faith and hope. II To the end ye may he established ; in order that ye may be confirmed in your Christian character. Such was the result which he would anticipate from a visit to them. 12. That is. As the thought of their becoming established might seem to imply a deficiency of Chris- tian strength on their part and a sup- position that they needed the pres- ence of an apostle to render them stable, and so might possibly make the impression that he felt liimself superior to them, the apostle at once, in the very considerate and conde- scending spirit which he habitually cherished, modifies the language and urbanely gives such a direction to the thought as to make himself a participator in the good result of a visit, since he needed, like all Chris- tians, encouragement and strength- ening. II That I may be comforted together with you ; that while among you, not only you, but myself also, may receive encouragement and strength from my visit, by our mu- tual faith. 13. In accordance with his desire to see the Roman bretln-en, he as- sures them that he had long since purposed to visit them but liad been hitherto prevented. — I would not have you ignorant ; I wish you to know : a form of expression frequent with the apostle. See 11: 25. 1 Cor. 10: 1. 1 Thess. 4 : 13. || Some fruit; some result of my apostolical labors. 14. The apostle's desire and pur- pose to visit Rome sprang from his sense of obligation to pi'each the gos- pel as extensively as possible, among people of all nations and of whatever degree of culture. / am debtor; I am under obligation. He had re- ceived a charge from the Saviour to publisli the gospel among the Gen- tiles, and thus was under obligation to Christ in reference to them. || To the Greeks and to the Barbarians ; bar- bai-ians, not necessarily in the sense of wild, savage men, but simply as not being Greeks, but being foreign- ers in respect to the Greeks : com- pare Acts 28: 2,4. 1 Cor. 14: 11. The twofold expression, Greeks and barbarians, includes all Gentile na- tions. Among the Greeks, however, the apostle doubtless included the Romans, since he could address them in the Greek language and the Ro- man empire had, at that time, ab- sorbed the Grecian states. ll To tJie wn3e and to the unwise; the educated CHAPTER I. 15 15 wise, and to the unwise. So, as much as in me is, I am ready to preach the gospel to you that are at Rome also. 16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth ; and the untaught, the refined and the rude. He felt under obligation, hav- ing been separated to this work, to preach the gospel to all. 16. The gospel had encountered opposition and reproach : in view of this and of the probability that in Rome especially it would meet Avith hostility and contempt, self-denial and elevation above the world wei-e required in one who would appear in Rome as the champion of the gospel. Compare Acts 17 : 18, 32, I Cor. 1 : 22, etc. But such a view could not shake the apostle's pur- pose; for he had an exalted esti- mate of the gospel. — 1 am not ashamed of the gospel. By this nega- tive expression he avows his lofty idea of the excellence of the gospel : as if he had said. It is not a matter to be ashamed of, but one to glory in. II For it is the power of God unto salva- tion, God employs the gospel as the medium of his power in saving men. The method of salvation made known in the gospel enables him to save sin- ners consistently with his perfections and righteous government ; or, more strictly in accordance with the apos- tle's following words, it is the me- dium through wliich the power of God acts on the spirit of man, reno- vating and transforming it, making it holy, and thus saving it from the condemnation and ntin which sin, if not thus counteracted, would inevita- bly produce. As in complicated machinery, when we ask, where is the power that regulates it and effects the result, we are directed to some wheel, or shaft, and are told. That is the power ; so in the work of human salvation, the gospel is the poirer : it is God's power, as being that through which he accompUshes the result; and in an important sense we might say, divine power resides in it. A similar view of the gospel, particu- larly of its central doctrine concern- ing Christ, is presented in 1 Cor. 1 : 18. — Salvation, agreeably to the thoughts in the two following verses, included both the idea of deliverance from the wrath of God against sin and that of a person's actual accept- ance to his favor as justified, that is, treated as if righteous. The tei-m is equivalent to eternal life. || To every one; not to persons of a particular nation : thus the exclusiveness of God's favor to Jews, as the Jews were disposed to restrict it to them- selves, is guarded against. Xot merely for Jews is salvation pro- vided, but for Gentiles also. || T'hat believeth : that reposes faith in Christ as the Saviour : thus the Jewish idea of salvation through a legal right- eousness, or through obedience to the Mosaic law, is also counteracted. A genuine personal faith in Christ, or becoming his disciple, is indispen- sable to the gospel's being to any person a divine power effecting his sah'ation : and such faith in Christ, exclusive of a meritorious obedience to the law, secures the salvation of him who has it. — The apostle is evi- dently preparing the way to intro- duce the main subject of the epistle. II To the Jew frst and also to the Greek. As Greek is here the contrast of Jew, it consequently means Gentile, or, rather, the Greek is here employed as the representative of all who are not Jeics. Whether the believer is a Jew or a Gentile is immaterial : whoever, of any nation, reposes faith in Christ partakes of salvation. In the gospel, so far as concerns the relation to God and the principle of acceptance with him, the distinction between Jew and Gentile fades away. — To the Jew frst; not through a special preference of the Jew to others on 16 ROMANS. 17 to the Jew first, and also to the Greek, for therein is THE RIGHTEOUSNESS OF GOD REVEALED FROM FAITH TO any moral {ground ; nor that there is any inherent recommendation of a Jew above a Grentile in the sight of God, or that faith in the gospel on the part of a Jew will more surely be acceptable to God : but the Jew is regarded as the first candidate for tlie blessings of the gospel, because the Jews first received the revelation of God's design to save men, and his promises oif salvation. As a histor- ical fact, salvation proceeded from the Jews. Compare John 4 : 22. Rom. 9 : 5. 11 : 24. It was, also, the case, almost of course, as circumstances were, that the gospel Avas first preached to Jews, and in the cities which the apostles visited they first sought the Jewish s>niagogues in order to make known the Lord Jesus to their countrymen, and through them, and after making eff"orts in their behalf, to the Gentile popula- tion. 1 7 That the gospel is the power of God unto salvation appears from the fact, that it discloses God's pecu- liar method of justifjang men ; that is, of acquitting them from the charge of guilt and accepting them, or treating them as if they had not sinned, but were righteous. For therein is revealed, etc. ; for in the gos- pel is disclosed, etc. A clear revela- tion of the way by which men could be pardoned and accepted of God, had not been previously made; it was reserved for the gospel. i| The righteousness of God ; not the personal righteousness of God, or that which belongs to him as one of his perfec- tions ; but that wliich he has ap- pointed for men in order to their justification in his sight. This is called the righteousness of God in dis- tinction from the idea of a righteous- ness consisting in obedience to the law of God and which is denominated by the apostle, in 10 : 3, one's own righteousness, also, in Phil. 3 : 9, right- eousness of [from] the law. Could this latter be justly claimed by any man, it would be the ground of hid acceptance with God ; since, in that case, sin could not be charged on him : but as no man has such a righteousness of his o-wn, or a right- eousness springing from the divine law, 3: 20. iSal. 2 : 16, God has adopted a different method, by which he may treat men as if they were righteous. This method is called God's righteousness, since it has been prescribed by him and since by virtue of it he bestows the result of righteousness, namely, justification. The method and the result proceed from God : the righteousness, there- fore, is called, in contrast with a per- sonal righteousness and claim to jus- tification, God's righteousness, that which he has appointed and that which he puts to our account, though we are destitute of a legal righteous- ness. This method of pronouncing men acquitted and of admitting them into favor with God is eminently his, and the disclosure of it is the chief distinctive feature of the gospel. It is a reckoning of righteousness to the account of a person who is himself destitute of righteousness, and liable to condemnation by the divine law, as a sinner ; or, a putting it gratuitously to his account so that he may be accepted as if he were righteous. II From faith to faith. These words are not, in meaning, to be connected with the word revealed, but with the words righteousness of God. This sort of righteousness which God is pleased to put to our account, viewed particularly in its result of justifica- tion, proceeds from faith, or is an effect of fiiith : compare 3: 30. 10: 6. Phil. 3 : 9. Faith is itself spoken of elsewhere as being this righteous- ness. See 4 : 3, 5, 9, 22. The precise CHAPTER I. 17 FAITH : as it is written, The just shall live by faith. difference between the two modes of representation is, probably, that in the latter tlie righteous quaVdij as- cribed to foith is had in view, and in the foniier the result of that as- cribed quality, namely, justification, is had in view. — To faith. In this part of the clause the word faith is used probably in the way of person- ification, as equivalent to the expres- sion those icho have faith, believers: to such persons this righteousness will be ascribed, or reckoned ; the benefits flowing from this method of regard- ing a person as righteous will be ex- tended to them. The form of speech is kindred with that in 3 : 22, unto oil and upon all them that believe. — The whole expression, fivm faith to faith, seems to be a twofold fonn of stating the same thought : this lighteousness proceeds from faith and belongs to faith. It is thus a comprehensive and intensive mode of stating the princi- ple on which God will ascribe, or impute, a justifpng righteousness to man. Faith is that principle ; and it is a pen-ading principle, the begin- ning and the end of man's justifica- tion in the sight of God. ]| As it is ivritten ; in Hab. 2:4. As harmo- nious with his statement relative to the principle involved in this right- eousness, the apostle quotes from the Old Testament a passage which cor- responds with his own language. II The just. The apostle's purpose, in quoting this passage, would have been more obvious, had the translation here used the words righteous man, and thus preserved resemblance be- tween the expression righteousness of God from fait] L and this quotation by which Paul illustrated and confii-med his statement. The clau?e would tlien have been, the righteous man shall live hy faith ; in other words, faith is the vital element to a righteous man ; from faith springs all his blessedness. A still closer connection of thought is believed, bv some editors of the Greek 2* Testament, to exist between the apos- tle's words, righteousness of God from faith, and the quoted language, which connection they sliow by so aiTanging the punctuation as to obtain the sig- nification. He who is righteous from feiith, or by faith, shall live. The word faith being thus brought into close grammatical connection with the Avord i-ighteous, the dependence of a right- eous, or justified, state on faith as its principle, becomes more obvious. This mode of punctuation, however, though advantageous, is not firee from grammatical objection ; and ne- cessity does not require it, in order to show the quotation to be available to the apostle's purpose, since in the ordinary mode of punctuation the quoted clause expresses his essential thought, namely, the vital dependence of a righteous man on faith. — The apostle quotes tlie passage, probably, not as containing an argument, but merely as illustrating, or as involving, the principle which is essential to the gospel. The prophet's language in the original Hebrew is variously ex- plained : some regard the Hebrew word rendered faith as signifying fidelity to one's duties. But* the apostle here quoted from the Greek translation ; and the cunent interpre- tation of the passage, •which was also the apostle's, and its A-erbal appro- priateness to the apostle's thought, would give it just weight among his readers as confirming his declaration. By other writers, the prophet is under- stood as originally conveying the idea that while the wicked Avould indulge in pride, good men Avould put faith in his prophecy and thus secure a true life, a blessed state of peace. — Some commentators have regarded the words righteousness of God as meaping the goodness, or clnnency, of God; but the passage from the Old Testament, produced by th.e apostle for illustrating and confirming his thought, makes it evident that right- 18 ROMANS. 18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all eousness is the only proper rendering ; also, that righteousness in this verse does not designate a quality of God, but something wliich he regards in the liglit of a righteousness put to man's account. || Faith. In the apostle's sense, fiiith is not mainly an intellectual belief in certain historical facts, or certain moral principles, but a con-esponding feeling of the heart, deeply seated, permanent, and affect- ing the entire character. As he who believes a declaration in wlrich his interests are deeply involved, places confidence in it and acts accordingly, so faith, in the apostle's sense, is a trusting to, or confiding in, certain declarations and an-angements of God relative to our salvation, and acting accordingly. It may be re- garded both as a state of soul harmo- nious with God's declarations and an-angements, and as a specific act of acceding to those declarations and arrangements : regarded as a state of soul, the specific act of trusting will exist and will be, more or less dis- tinctly, a matter of consciousness to the subject of it ; regarded as a speci- fic act, it presupposes the state of soul which is harmonious with. it. Trust- ing in another, whose qualities and acts warrant this trust, and whose authority is also thereby acknowl- edged, is the main element in genuine faith; that is, tnisting in Christ as the atoning Saviour, through whom God bestows pardon and eternal life. Faith in Christ is conjoined with a consciousness of personal sinfulness and ill desert, and with penitence ; it acknowledges Christ as a Redeemer from the condemnation and power of sin, and trusts in him as such. A man \vho thus believes in Christ is a disciple of Christ, relying on liim for religious doctrine, for deliverance from condemnation and for spiritual influences to comjjlete the moral reno- vation of the soul and make him right in the sight of God. Thus faith, or trust, is the pervading spirit of discipleship to Christ. The gos- pel presupposes the sinfulness of men and the impossibility of their being accepted of God through a per- sonal obedience to the divine law ; it is, consequently, an arrangement for the benefit of men as sinners, by which God can treat them as if i-ight- eous, and place them under the disci- pline of his Spirit for their complete, though gradual, recoveiy from sin. He will thus treat them, if with a state of soul in harmony Avith his ar- rangement, they accept his an'ange- ment and subject themselves to it. This state of soul is that of disciple- ship to Christ, or of trust in him ; and tills is signified by the word faith. The point of difference between this mode of acceptance with God and that which the apostle denominates one's own righteousness, or righteousness from the law, that is, righteousness consisting in one's deeds and procur- ing justification by his own works, is obA'ious : in the foimer, the person is conscious of being a sinner, con- demned by the laAV and having in himself no ground for acceptance with God ; he is penitent and humble in view of his sins and, with self-re- nunciation, relies on the mercy of God in Christ for acceptance and for all spiritual blessings ; and thus he heart- ily assents to God's view of his char- acter and ill desert, and confides in God's mode of deliverance from con- demnation : in the latter, the person, Avhile he may have a vague sense of sinfulness, does not feel himself to be utterly illdeserving and destitute of ability to acquire a claim on God for acceptance, and therefoi'e he relies on deeds of his own for pardon and the favor of God. The two cases may be illustrated by our Lord's parabfc of the Pharisee and the Publican, in Luke 18: 9-14. 18, etc. This peculiarity of the gospel, that faith, not legal obedience, is the essential element in the right- CHAPTER I. 19 ungodliness, and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth eousness by which men can be justi- fied in the sight of God, the apostle now proceeds to establish. In order to establish it, he brings distinctly to view tlie fact that men are under the displeasure, or wrath, of God on account of their sins : they are tlius in a state of condemnation by the law of God and, of course, cannot be justified in his siglit on the ground of obedience to that laAv, or by a personal righteousness of their own. Such a righteousness they have not ; but are sinners, under condem- nation. Of necessity, "then, they must be justified on a different ground ; and hence God has dis- closed, in the gospel, his own method of justifying men ; namely, through faith in Christ which is, by the divine appointment, as really available for tlieir acceptance with God, as a com- plete personal obedience to his law would have been, especially since it places the believer in union with Christ who has perfectly obeyed that law and died the just for the unjust. 1 Pet. 3: 18. The sinfulness of all men is, then, the first thing to be proved. The apostle commences with the case of the Gentiles, and then passes to that of the Jews. The former he easily disposes of, in 1 : 18-32, as it was so plain and was, of course, admitted by the Jews, for whose conviction mainly he was writing : the case of the Jews he argues more at length, taking up the various objections which, he knew, Avould arise in a Jew's mind, particularly as to the consequence which results from the 'tnith that Jews, too, are sinners, in chapters 2-4. This is the chief point with the apos- tle ; namely, to show that Jews, though specially favored of God with knowledge of his will, cannot reason- ably hope for justification on the ground of obedience to the divine law. It is important to keep this thought in mind as being really the principal point, since it will help to elucidate some items in the argument which would not othenvise appear so necessary, or so convincing. Besides, if this point be established, a princi- ple is evidently involved, which would be applicable to all men ; namely, if Jews, even, to whom the law of God, both moral and ritual, has been given, cannot be justified on the ground of that law, of course those Avho have not had the advantage of a religious code from heaven cannot be justified on the ground of personal obedience. Moreover, the Jews indulged the thought, that the only way for Gen- tiles to find acceptance with God was, to embrace Judaism and live according to its presciiptions : but, if even Jews themselves must be saved on a different ground, of coui-se the estimate of Judaism must be lowered, and God's method of justification, through faith in Christ, be regarded as the all-sufficient and the only ground of salvation for both Jews and Gentiles. i^ 18. For the urath of God ; his dis- pleasure, including the judgments which that displeasure leads him to inflict. II Is revealed from heaven ; has been made manifest from heaven, where God is conceived of as dwell- ing ; the manifestation, then, has been made by God himself. || Against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men. Ungodliness relates particularly to men's spirit and conduct towards God ; unrighteousness has respect to all the moral relations of men gen- erally and expresses their lack of confonnity to Avhat is just and right. The two terms are here combined in order to present more fully and inten- sively the ground of God's displeas- ure against men. || Who hold the truth in unrighteousness ; who possess the truth wliich would naturally lead to righteousness, but live, notwith- standing, in unrighteousness. They know the right, but pursue the Avrong : they possess the tnith, but do not iillow it to govern them. — A prefer- 20 ROMANS. 19 in unrighteousness. Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them ; for God hath showed it unto them ; 20 for the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead ; so that they are without excuse : because that when they knew God, they able version of this clause, in the judg- ment of eminent interpi-eters, is, icho hinder the truth by unrighteousness ; hin- der it, br their unrighteous propensi- ties, from producing its appropriate effects, repress its legitimate influ- ences. Their -wickedness prompts them to disobey the truth and to make it powerless. — Many of the erroneous opinions of men concerning God and their moral relations spring from a sinful inclination. — How is tliis reve- lation of God's Avrath against men's umighteousness made ? The apostle does not probably allude to any de- clarations of God' to men in the"^ Old Testament, since he is speaking of the heathen. He may have reference to the testimony of God in men's consciences ; but more probably, to the actual manifestation of his wrath in giving up men to their pers-erse inclinations and allowing them to in- volve themselves in all the pollution and misery to which idolatiy, in a particular manner, leads. The illus- tration of the apostle's remark by the judgments with which God visited idolatrous nations commences at the 24th verse. — The 18th verse seems to be a statement applicable to all men, though made with special refer- ence to the heathen world who had so widely departed from the truth Avhich God had made accessible to all. The verse contains two distinct thoughts concerning men : first, that they pos- sess a knowledge of religious truth ; next, that they disregard it, or hinder its proper influence by their wicked- ness. The first of these he confirms in verses 1 9 and 20 ; and the second, in verses 21-23 ; the result of their disregarding the tmth, namely, the wrath of God, his punitive judgments, he begins to unfold in the 24th verse. 19. Knowledge respecting God has been given to men. — That which may he known of God ; not all which is capable of being known, or which men are capable of receiving. The expression is equiA^alent to knowledge of God, concerning his existence, liis relation to men as their Creator, and his consequent claims on them. || Is manifest in them ; in their souls. The apostle speaks not of philosophers merely, but of the people in general ; and indicates the conviction, which arises in the human soul, of the ex- istence of God and of men's obliga- tion to him. ]| God hath showed it unto them ; by his Avorks which evince a Creator, as the apostle immediately explains. 20. The invisible things of him ; his perfections and supremacy. These are things not to be perceived l)y the eye, brft to be apprehended by the mind. || Fi-om the creation of the world ; from the date of the creation, ever since the work of creation. II Are clearly seen, etc., though invisi- ble, and not of a nature to come under the observation of tlie eye, yet they are clearly manifested to the mind, being apprehended by means of God's works. Compare Ps. 19 : 1. || Even his etei'nal power and Godhead. Tliese are the invisible things of him. His eternal power is here specified as manifested in creation and in the up- holding of all things. Godhead, or Deity, comprehends the qualities of God generally wJiich are im])ressed on the human mind by the work of creation and providence. || So that they are loithout excuse. This mnni- festation of eternal power and Deity leaves men without excuse for their ignorance of God, and their sinful indulgences. CHAPTER I. 21 21 glorified Mm not as God, neither were thankful, but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was dark- 22 ened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and four-footed beasts, and creeping things. Wherefore God also gave them 24 up to uncleanness, through the lusts of their own hearts, to dishonor their own bodies between themselves : who changed 25 the truth of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen. 26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections. For even their women did chancre the natural use into that which 21. The apostle next shows that the unrighteousness of men led them to disregard the knowledge which they had of God. — Theii c/lorijied him not as God, etc. ; they did not honor him as the true God, nor thankfully acknowledge him as the giver of all good. They framed vain and silly conceptions of God, refusing to admit into their minds the light of truth. 22, 23. Professing themselves to he unse, etc. Eeference is here had, not only to the philosophers, but to the educated generally among the hea- then. With all their mental cultiva- tion and their pretensions to wisdom, they were foolish as to rehgious mat- ters. The Avisdom of the world proved itself folly. Compare 1 Cor. 1 : 21. The professedly wise, instead of admiring and adoring the glory of God to whose nature nothing cor- ruptible, or perishable, belongs, paid honors to images resembling perish- able men, birds, fourfooted beasts and serpents. So deeply debased had the human mind at length become as to rank mortal creatures among objects of adoration. || Changed the glorrj, etc. ; exchanged the glory of the im- mortal God for an image like to mortal man. — The fourfold division, here given, may liave been a current division of living creatures ; or, it may have denoted various objects of idola- try among various nations. The Greeks and Romans employed images in human form for idolatrous pur- poses ; other nations, the Egyptians for example, paid divine honors to the other objects here mentioned. 24. The foolish views of God, which the heathen had adopted, and the practice of idolatry had led to their appropriate results in still fur- ther debasing men and making them victims of shameless lewdness and pollution. To this they were aban- doned by the judgment of God. — Idolatiy is generally connected -svith gross licentiousness. 25. The debasement, to which the Gentiles had been left, led the apostle again to advert to the cause of their having been judicially given up. — Who changed the truth, etc. ; Avho ex- changed the trtith concerning God for a lie ; or, exchanged the true God for lying vanities, for idols, paying liomage to created things in prefei-- ence to the Creator. || Who is blessed forever ; rather, who is worthy to be praised and spoken gloriously of forever. — With a holy indignation at the perversion which men had made of God's revelation of himself in the work of creation, and at the pollution to which idolatry had de- based them, the apostle utters an ascription of praise to the living God of truth and holiness. 26 — 32. A more detailed view now follows of the debasement and misery to Avhich the Gentiles were given up 22 ROMANS, 27 is against nature : and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the women, burned in their lust one toward another ; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error 28 which was meet. And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate 29 mind to do those things which are not convenient : being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covet- ousness, maliciousness ; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, 30 malignity ; whisperers, backbiters, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to 31 parents, without understanding, covenant-breakers, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful : who knowing the 32 judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them. in consequence of their forsaking the true God and practising idolatry. All kinds of vice sprung from the repro- bate mind to which God gave them up. 27. Their error; their moral error, their wickedness. 28. As theij did not liliB to retain God, etc. They disliked his charac- ter and rejected him : he consequently gave them over to a mind whieh he must dislike, and left that reprobate mind to the consequences of its own foolish choices. || Not convenient; not suitable : a delicate mode of saying abominable. 29. Whisperers ; slanderers in se- cret ; or, those who merely ivhisper their malice. 32. Have pleasure in them that do them : an additional mark of moral debasement. Besides indulging in practices which they know God ab- hors, they also approve of persons who indulge in the same px-actices. However sinful a man may be, he disapproves commonly of those who indulge in the same excesses as him- self. Such was the picture of the Gen- tile world. The description was not intended, however, to be applicable in every particular to every individual ; but it was generally applicable : some were chargeable with some of these sins and some Avith others, while yet all these sins were abundantly prac- tised. Exceptions, doubtless, there were ; and the apostle seems to allow, in 2 : 14, 15, that some of the Gen- tiles strove to obey the moral law of their being. These very persons, however, would be among the first to acknowledge the prevailing sinfulness and would be painfully conscious of something wrong in tliemselves. CHAPTER 11. Righteousness of God in his retributions to men, 1-16. Sinfulness of the' Jews, 17-24. The heart, the seat of genuine piety, 25-29. 1 Therefore thou art inexcusable, man, whosoever thou art, that judgest : for wherein thou judgest another, thou con- deninest thyself; for thou that judgest, doest the same things. CHAPTER II. Gentiles, it would be granted by the Jews, are under condemnation, as sinners. But how stands the case with Jews ? If the Jews, too, not- withstanding their superior advan- tages, are transgressors and are guilty of sins similar to those of the Gen- tiles, their hope of being accepted in the sight of God by virtue of their being Jews and their punctilious ob- servance of religious requisitions, must be abandoned ; and for them, as well as for Gentiles, the ground of justifi- cation must be the special method made known in the gospel. The apostle, tlierefore, next proceeds to consider the case of Jews as to the question of their sinfulness and the ground on which they were hoping for justification. Every Jew Avould at once pro- nounce condemnation on the Gentiles for the sins which had just been men- tioned. The apostle, then, takes ad- vantage of the judgment, which every Jew would thus pass, to bring a charge of inexcusable guilt on the Jews themselves ; for they were guilty of the same sins. He makes a direct assertion of this fact ; and on the strength of it prepares the way for the conclusion that Jews, as well as Gentiles, are under condemnation. — His purpose requires him to establish tlie righteousness of God in his retri- butive treatment of men, whether Gentiles or Jews, vs. 1-16. He then exposes the i-esemblance, in point, of moral conduct, of the Jews to the Gentiles, 17-24; and insists on the spiritual character of genuine piety, 25-29. The apostle has, evidently, before his mind a Jew whom he considers as passing judgment on the Gentiles : for he now leaves the case of the Gentiles and turns to those who would unite with him in condemning them ; and such were the Jews, here represented by an individual. He does not attempt to conceal his pur- pose to show that Jews, also, are in a state of sin and condemnation ; for he very soon distinctly mentions them. He asserts at the outset that the person, whom he introduces as condemning the Gentiles, is doing the same things. The case is not stated as a hypothetical one : the posi- tive assertion is made, as one which cannot be questioned, that the person, now in his eye, commits the same deeds. He pronounces it absurd for such a one to think of escaping the righteous judgment of God. The force of his statements consists veiy much in the self-conviction which would arise in the mind of such a man, when he should look at the naked facts and place them by the side of the impartial moral principle which must regulate 'the coming re- tribution. 1 . Whosoever tJiou art that Judgest. The original is very emphatic — man, every one judging, that is, judg- ing the Gentiles : thou condemnest thyself; because while thou judg- est those who do these things, thou thyself doest the same. The apostle does not say. If thou do the same things, as though he were making a supposition so as to gain assent to a moral principle, before his purpose to apply it was perceived, and then to show that the Jews were actually (23j 24 ROMANS. 2 But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to 3 truth against them which commit such things. And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of 4 God ? Or despisest thou the riches of his goodness, and for- bearance, and long-suffering ; not knowing that the goodness of God leadeth thee to repentance ? but after thy hardness 5 and impenitent heart, treasurest up unto thyself wrath against the day of wrath, and revelation of the righteous judgment chargeable with the same sins. He makes the assertion as an indisputable one, and applies it in proof that they ■were under condemnation ; since, if God did not regard them as under condemnation, he would not be true to his principles. — The charge here made does not require for its support, that precisely all and the same immo- rahties and excesses should be found among the Jews, as among the Gen- tiles ; but that transgressions of the same kind existed among them, and that they were as really guilty, as the Gentiles, of disregarding the will of God and of doing things which Avere, equally with the sinful practices of Gentiles, violations of the divine law. 2. But loe are sure, etc. It is a settled point with us, that the sentence which God passes on those who do such things accords with truth ; it is a perfectly right sentence, such as a true view of the case requires. In this, God is faithful to his holy char- acter and government. 3. And thinhest thou this, etc. Thinkest thou that thou, who doest the veiy things which thou condemn- est in others, shalt escape the judg- ment of a righteous God ? How ab- sux'd ! how subversive of all justice ! The Jews did virtually indulge such a thought, cherishing a mistaken re- liance on their descent from Abraham and on the covenant of God with him. Compare Matt. 3 : 7-9. Yet by placing the matter on the ground of common sense and conscience, the apostle would show how futile was such a tliought. 4. Or despisest thou, etc. Chang- ing the ground from that of simple justice to that of gratitude and a proper use of advantages, he would more fully expose the futility of the Jewish view. — Thou hast, as a Jew, been peculiarly favored of God, hav- ing largely enjoyed his goodness and foi'bearance : and dost thou overlook all this goodness and the design of God to lead thee, thereby, to repent- ance ■? — The Jews had shown an in- sensibility to their obligations and slighted, so far as its real purpose was concerned, the distinguishing goodness of God towards them. 5. But after thy hardness, etc. The apostle here urges on the Jews the inevitable result of such insensi- bility to the special goodness of God. A day of righteous retribution will come, when God will render to every one according to his deeds, not accord- ing to his nationality or parentage ; according to his ob/if/ations, not his baseless hopes. This result comes from the very nature of things, and from the rectitude of God's retribu- tion. II Dai/ of ivrath ; the appointed time when the wrath of God against the wicked will be dis])layed. That wrath is now threatened ; and though doubts concerning it are often ex- pressed, it will in due time be exe- cuted. II Rei^elation of the righteous judgment of God. The final judg- ment is here meant, Avhich will fully disclose the righteousness of God in liis rejection, or his acceptance, of men, respectively, according to their cliaracters. CHAPTER II. 20- 6 of God, who will render to every man according to his 7 deeds : to them who by patient continuance in well doing, seek for glory, and honor, and immortality : eternal life : but 8 unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, 9 but obey unrighteousness : indignation and wrath, tribulation and anguish upon every soul of man that doeth evil, of the 10 Jew first, and also of the Gentile : but glory, honor, and peace, to every man that worketh good ; to the Jew first, and 1 1 also to the Gentile : for there is no respect of persons with 12 God. For as many as have sinned without law shall also 6-8. Who will render, etc. God will, without distinction of nations or regard to external circumstances, render eternal life to those who through persevering obedience to him are seeking for future glory ; but his indignation and wrath ^v-ill fall on those, of whatever nation, who are rebellious against him and disobey the truth. || Eternal life. These words are grammatically dependent on the verb render. — The terms glory, honor and immortality are here impres- sively grouped together, as conveying substantially the same idea in some- what different aspects, namely, the glory of heavenly perfection, the honor of being approved and rewarded by God, the immortal, deathless, state of heaven. These are all combined in eternal life. \\ Them that are conten- tious ; rebellious against God. 9, 10. Tribulation, etc. A pecu- liarly solemn repetition of the same great truth, with the distinct declara- tion that it is applicable both to Jews and to Gentiles : utter misery on the doers of evil, glory and bUss for the doers of good, whether Jews or Gen- tiles. Yet to the Jew first, because he had pre-eminence above the Gentiles in being favored with a revelation from God. — The word first here sets before the mind the Jews and the Gentiles respectively, as two com- munities : of these, the Jews had been the more higlily favored as to moral advantages and might there- fore be regarded as first to be dealt with, whether for reward or for pun- 3 ishment. Compare 1 : 16. In the verse before us. as in 1 : 16, the origi- nal has the word which means Greek; but it is obviously equivalent to Gen- tile. The xery extensive spread of the Greek language and customs in the apostle's time accounts for this comprehensive use of the word. 1 1 . For there is no respect of per- sons, etc. The ground of this disre- gard of the outward distinction be- tween Jew and Gentile in men's final award, is the impartiality of God : he does not respect persons in judg- ment, but looks at the heart and the deeds. 12. For as many as have sinned, etc. In confirmation of the truth that God has no respect of persons, or is not partial, in judgment, and that he treats men according to the demands of right, Avithout favorit- ism, the apostle afiirms that God, in passing judgment on those who have sinned, will treat them according to the degree of light which they have had : those who have sinned Avithout the advantage of the revealed law, or the revelation from heaven by Moses, making known the will of God, Avill not be condemned by that law ; though they will perish, their doom will not proceed from that law, and will not have the aggravations which Avill be felt by those wlio have sinned, and Avho perish notwithstand- ing their possession of the law : but those who, possessing that law, have lived in sin, will be condemned by it Thus it is not as Gentiles that any 26 ROMANS. perish without law: and as many as liave sinned in the law, 13 shall be judged by the law, (for not the hearers of the hiw are just before God, but the doers of the law shall be justi- 14 fied. For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these having not the law, are a law unto themselves, which show the work of the 15 law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing wit- ness, and their thoughts the mean Avhile accusing, or else ex- will be rejected, but as sinners, whe- ther Jews or Gentiles, and their doom, respectively, will accord with the measure of light which they had. As the apostle had the case of Jews and Gentiles before his mind, it seems most congruous to regard him as re- feiTing particularly to the revelation made to tlie Jews, that is, to the Mosaic law, or the Mosaic religious institute. A general principle is, of course, involved Avhich will apply in all parallel cases. 13. For not the hearers, etc. As illustrating and sustaining the idea, that the possession of the law, or the religious institution, which God had revealed, will not secure acceptance with God, the apostle suggests the thought that, in order to attain tlie blessings wliich the law promised, it was not sufficient to liave the law and to know its directions ; but it was necessary to obey it : not those who merely hear the law are held as righteous before God, but those who obey it. The apostle is here stating a universal principle as to the claims of a law, or a i-eligious institution, and the condition on which those who have it may, by means of it, be held and treated as i-ighteous ; name- ly, obeying it. This holds true both in respect to a legal institution and in respect to the gospel. Each re- quires obedience in order to salvation. A law must be obeyed, if those who have it would be saved by it; the revelation in the Old Testament must be obeved, if those who have it would be saved by it ; the gospel must be obeyed, if those who have it would be saved by it. It was not, however, in this connection, the apostle's pur- pose to state the evangelical princi- ple of salvation, in distinction from the legal. 14, 15. For when the Gentiles, etc. That not mere knowledge of the written law is sufficient to secure its blessings, but that compliance with its demands is requisite, and that any who obey the degree of moral light which lias been given them will en- joy the blessings of obedience to the law, is obvious from the fact, that even the Gentiles, who have not the law, but, by the force of natural reason and conscience, act in harmony with the law, do yet possess a law as really as the Jews, though not to the same extent : they feel the influence and enjoy tlie benefits of a law. They are, through the divine constitution of man's nature, a law to themselves ; they have a law Avrittcn on their hearts. This is manifest from their having within them a consciousness of self-approval, or of self-condem- nation, according as they have obey- ed, or violated, the inward law, the law of their moral nature. It is evi- dently, then, the duers of the law of God who enjoy its blessings, and not merely the hearers of it : so far as the heathen do, by nature, the things which it enjoins, they enjoy its bless- ings as well as do those Jews who obey. Thus it is not the Jews alone, who have a law ; the Gentiles also have the same law essentially, and are a law to themselves, though tliey know not Moses as a lawgiver. — The impartiality of God is thus manifest in judging men either by the written law, or by the inward unwi-itten law, CHAPTER II. n 16 cusing one another;) in the day when God shall judge the secrets of men by Jesus Christ, according to my gospel. 17 Behold, thou art called a Jew, and restest in the law, and makest thy boast of God, and knowest his will, and appro vest according as they have had the one, or only the other. That the requisi- tions of the divine law are inscribed on the Gentiles' hearts, and thus that they liave a law, is evident ; since their conscience bears a joint testi- mony with that law, and their reflec- tions on their deeds cither accuse them of guilt, or defend them against the suspicion of guilt : their thoughts incline this way and that, accusing and excusing, according as con- science disapproves, or allows. — The idea of a contest among the thoughts of the heathen may also be conveyed by the apostle ; their thoughts, or reasonings, alternately accusing, or defending, according as conscience, or as inclination, prevails. || By nature ; that is, by the light of natural reason and the impulse of conscience, the higher principles of our nature. It may not be amiss to remark, that while, in the case here stated by the apostle, nature, that is, natural reason and conscience, prompts to obedience, in the case stated in Eph. 2 : 3 na- ture, that is, natural inclination, prompts to disobedience. || The loork of the law ; that which the law re- quires ; an expression of the same im- port as the things contained in the law. 16. Li the day, etc. This verse is to be connected, in sense, with the 12th, as an addition to the thought there expressed. || Secrets ; the se- cret acts, the purposes and affections of men. These are all open and naked to the sight of God : deeds both open and concealed, purposes and feelings, Avill be brought into judgment. Thus the extent, tlie strictness, and the exact justice of the final sentence are indicated. II According to my gospel ; the gospel which I preacJi. In this clause, refer- ence is particularly had to the state- ment which precedes it, that the judg- ment will be conducted by Christ. Compare Matt. 25 : 31-4G. John 5 : 22. 2 Cor. 5: 10. 17-29. Having thus shown the impartiality of God in his judgment of men, whether Jews or Gentiles, the apostle now returns to the asser- tion which he had made concerning the Jews, that they did the things which they condemned in the Gen- tiles. In order to give this the greater effect, he reminds them of the emi- nent moral position in which they re- garded themselves as standing, and of their superiority in point of reli- gious knowledge. He then, by a series of pertinent questions, appeals to their own consciousness, and to their lives, as bearing testimony to that assertion and showing liow sin- gularly inconsistent and inexcusable were their sins. Without designing to intimate that it was of no benefit to be a Jew, he proceeds to ailirm that their boasted privileges, having been abused, are of no avail in securing eternal life, and that only genuine up- rightness of heart towards God will be accepted by him. 17. Thou' art called a Jew; thou bearest the name of Jew. To be a Jew was to have the honor of belong- ing to the descendants of Abraham, the favored race, distinguished from the corrupt Gentile Avorld, by privi- leges which God had bestowed. li Restest in the law ; coufidest in the law, the religious system given by God through Moses ; trustest in that, as an assurance of the divine favor. The Jews prided themselves on their possessing tlie religion:? institution which God had revealed, as well as on their knowledge of God and their relation to him as his people. || Mak- est thy boast of God ; boastest of God as specially pledged to bless and save Jews. 28 ROMANS, 18 the things that are more excellent, being instructed out of 19 the law, and art confident that thou thyself art a guide of 20 the blind, a light of them which are in darkness, an instructor of the foolish, a teacher of babes, w^hich hast the form of 21 knowledge and of the truth in the law. Thou therefore which teachest another, teachest thou not thyself ? thou that preach- 22 est, a man should not steal, dost thou steal ? thou that sayest, a man should not commit adultery, dost thou commit adul- tery ? thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege ? 18. Knoivest his loill ; the will of God as communicated in the Old Testament. || Approvest the things that are more excellent; or, as some translate, triest things that differ, or distinguishest between things that differ; that is, makest moral distinctions more exactly than other people, dis- criminating between what it is proper and what it is not proper to do, be- tween what is pleasing and what is displeasing to God. The ground of the ability to discriminate is, that a Jew is instructed out of the law of God. Great care was taken to instruct Jew- ish children in all the peculiarities of the nation, as to history and religion; and provision was made by the occur- rence of festivals and the religious exercises connected with them, as well as by more private methods, and by frequent religious acts, personal, domestic and public, to keep the peo- ple acquainted with the divine deal- ings and requisitions. 19, 20. And art confident, etc. The Jews took not a little pride in comparing themselves with Gentiles, in respect to religion. They regarded the Gentiles, in comparison with themselves, as blind, in darkness, mere children, and fools : but they had, in their law, knowledge and tnith respecting God brought into form and system ; their law was the embodiment of religious knowledge and truth. 21, 22. Thus faA^orably siUiated, according to their own acknowledg- ment, and in their own esteem, what, notwithstanding, was the fact in re- gard to their conduct ? — Teachest thou not thyself'? They failed rightly to apprehend and to learn for them- selves the instructions of which they boasted. Enjoining on others the prohibition to steal, they were them- selves guilty of stealing. So in the case of adultery and kindred sins. II Thou that abhorrest idols, dost thou commit sacrilege ? The fundamental idea in this inquiiy is not perfectly obvious. As robbing from sacred places of articles belonging to them was a form of sacrilege, some sup- pose the apostle here charges on the Jews the commission of sacrilege by robbing God of what belonged to him, namely, requisite honor and obedience. The worship of idols detracted from the honor of the name of God, and was therefore abhoiTcd by the Jews ; yet they themselves grossly detracted from that honor. Others explain the question more literally : they suppose that Jews were in the habit of visiting idolatrous temples and purloining valuable arti- cles which had been left there in honor of the gods of those temples : thus, though they professed to abhor idols, they would gladly visit idol temples and commit sacrilege, turn- ing idolatry to their personal account and cherishing a secret pleasure in idolatry. — This latter vicAv of the passage seems most in harmony with the connected passages ; since they present actual contrasts. It would be more satisfiictory, however, if his- torical evidence could be found that Jews did, sometimes, at least, visit idolatrous temples for such a pur- pose. In favor of this view, it is tc CHAPTER II. 29 23 thou that makest thy boast of the law, through breaking the law dishonorest thou God ? For the name of God is blas- 24 phemed among the Gentiles through you ; as it is written. 25 For circumcision verily profiteth, if thou keep the law ; but if thou be a breaker of the law, thy circumcision is made 26 uncircumcision. Therefore, if the uncircumcision keep the righteousness of the law, shall not his uncircumcision be 27 counted for circumcision ? And shall not uncircumcision which is by nature, if it fulfil the law, judge thee, who by 28 the letter and circumcision dost transgress the law ? For he be said that the expression, robbers of churches, more correctly, robbers of temples, is given as the translation of the kindred noun in the only passage of the New Testament where it oc- curs. Acts 19 : 37. It is also worthy of notice that one of the laws of Moses, Deut. 7 : 25, prohibits taking off from idols the silver and gold which might be found on them. This implies that in the days of Moses the Jews were exposed to the temptation of appropriating to them- selves such treasures ; and though this prohibition may have had re- spect to idols which had in some way fallen into their possession, yet in subsequent times purloining* from idol-temples may have been pi*ac- tised, Josephus in his Antiquities of the Jews, iv. 8. 10. gives, as one of the regulations of Moses, the fol- lowing : — " Xor may any one steal what belongs to strange temples ; nor take away the gifts that are dedi- cated to any god ; " a prohibition, which whether rightly traced to Moses or not, implies the existence of the practice which it forbids. 23, 24. Thou that makest thy boast of the law, etc. Though they made a boast of possessing the revealed law of God, yet they dishonored him by their notorious transgressions of it, and virtually exemplitied a declara- tion in their own scriptures. Is. 52 : 5, that by their vices the name of God was reviled among the heathen. — This quotation is taken from the Greek translation of the Hebrew 3* scriptures, so much in use among the Jews in the apostle's days, and is specially applicable to his purpose by the verbal addition made in that translation. It was not necessary for the apostle to enter with greater detail on the evidence of his position, that the Jews did the same things as the Gen- tiles. By a few comprehensive ques- tions, he could awaken attention and give a right direction to the reflec- tions of the considerate. Enough was said to produce conviction that the Jews were sinners, as well as the Gentiles. 25-27. For circumcision verily profiteth, etc. The Jews placed great reliance on circumcision, as the sign of their being in covenant with God. The apostle now wished to forestall an objection which Avould arise in the mind of a Jew ; namely, that he made no account of this ordinance and that, according to his view, it was of no advantage to be a Jew. He affirms, that circumcision in itself is of no avail ; it must, in order to be of efficacy in securing the favor of God, be connected with a spiritual obedience to the religious institute which enjoined it. The requisitions of God have respect to the spirit of man : his heart must be right, in order that he may be accepted of God. A JcAv who should live in violation of the religious temper en- joined in his scriptures might just as well be a Gentile, so far as possession of the divine favor is concerned. If ao ROMANS. is not a Jew, which is one outwardly : neither is that circum- 29 cision, which is outward in the flesh ; but he is a Jew, which is one inwardly ; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter : whose praise is not of men, but of God. CHAPTER III. Objections, or queries, in regard to the alleged sinfulness of the Jews, 1-8. Testimony of the Jewish scriptures to the sinfulness of Jews and Gentiles, 9-18. The righteous prin- ciple which God observes in his treatment of men, and the impossibility of any man's being justified through a legal obedience, 19, 20. The righteousness which is available to men's justification, 21-26. The boasting of the Jews inadmissible, 27-30; yet tho law not invalidated by faith, 31. a Gentile have an obedient spirit, he will receive from God as favorable treatment as if he were a Jew ; and though uncircumcised and having no outwai-d sign of a covenant-rela- tion to God, his obedience would con- demn the Jew who, favored with the written law and being circumcised, should live in transgression of the law. In other words, circumcision merely and the mere possession of the law of God, or of the system of religion revealed by him, are of no account in his sight. He requires an obedient spirit, inward piety. 28, 29. For he is not a Jeio, etc. The ground of the view that God accepts a pious Gentile and rejects a disobedient Jew is, that a genuine Jew, one whom God will acknowl- edge as such, is a Jew in heart ; and circumcision, to be acceptable, must be inwai'd, that of the spirit. Compare Deut. 10: 16. Jer. 4 : 4. The ex- ternal obedience presupposes a con-e- sponding temper of heart, conformed to the divine will. God looks not on the outward appearance, but on the heart : not what man praises has true worth, but what God approves. II Circumcision is that of the heaii, in the spirit, not in the letter ; spiritual circumcision, the obedience of the heart, not merely an outward com- pliance with a written precept ; but inward, as is the spirit of a man, not a mere outward thing, as is the let- ter of a law, or a wi'itten precept. II Whose praise : the word ivhose re- lates here, according to the original, to the word Jeic, The thouglit of the apostle, however, is equally ap- plicable to circumcision, and, of course, to any act of outward obedi- ence. — These spiritual views of reli- gion, though harmonious with those presented in various parts of the Old Testament, had been greatly over- looked, and had nearly, or quite, faded away from the Jewish mind. Religion had become a matter of form and ceremony : and yet the Jews relied on this external religion with an assurance that it would avail to their salvation. The apostle di- rectly and earnestly assailed the pride of the Jews in their external fonnal religion, and made prominent the nature of true religion, as spiritual, and quite independent of circumci- sion, or any mere ritual observances. CHAPTER III. The apostle had distinctly denied to the Jew, as such, any moral pre- eminence above the Gentile : the one was a sinner as Avell as the other. This view, placing both Gentiles and Jews on a common level, as to the fact of being sinners, and asserting the uselessness, for acceptance with God, of the external observance of circumcision, would naturally raise CHAPTER III. 31 objections in the minds of Jews, since it was so different from the view then prevalent among them. Before he closes up, therefore, his argument in proof of the sinfulness of the Jews and presents the inference resulting from it in regard to justification, he pauses in order to remove such ob- jections. We need not conceive of the apos- tle as introducing an objector and conducting a dialogue with him : he rather, as he knew the Jewish mind, states substantially what a Jew might be expected to say. The queries proposed are founded on external views of religion, and on an abuse of the covenant relation in which God had stood to the Jewish people. The chief question is, Of Avhat advan- tage, then, is it to be a Jew rather than a Gentile 1 The reply to this suggested another queiy concerning the faithfulness of God to his engage- ments : and the reply to this latter suggested, in its turn, another con- cerning the justice of God, should he inflict wrath on the Jews. The reply to this is followed by another query wliich calls in question the rightful- ness of condemning an unfaithful Jew, as if he were to be classed with ordinary sinners, or with Gentile sin- ners. Vs. 1-8. Declai:ations of the Jewish scrip- tures are next adduced to confirm the charge that both Jews and Gentiles are sinners, 9-18, and the righteous principle which regulates the judicial retributions of God is stated, as also the conclusion, that no man can be justified through the law, 19, 20. — The righteousness Avhieh is available with God for justification is then an- nounced, and the ground of it ex- hibited, 21-25. — The boasting in which the Jews indulged is shown to be baseless, 27-30 ; yet the law is not invalidated by faith, 31. In order to apprehend the import of the objections, i-ather cavils, pre- sented and disposed of in verses 1-8, we must consider, that tlie Jews had come to regard the promises of divine i'avor and eternal life to the posterity of Abraham as dependent on their observance of circumcision, particu- larly, and of the other prescriptions of the Mosaic ritual ; but these prom- ises they held to be otherwise uncon- ditional, so that they would be, of course, fulfilled to all Jews whether faithful, or not, to the spiritual requi- sitions of the Mosaic religion. It was the privilege of a Jew, they thought, to be one of the chosen peo- ple of God and hence to be interested in divine promises which would not fail : Jews, therefore, were not to be treated, in the divine administration, like Gentiles, whom they branded with the name of sinners. Compare Matt. 3 : 9. John 8 : 33-40. Rom. 2: 17. 9:4. They could not rid themselves of the thought that, if they were circumcised, it would be unjust in God to withhold from them eternal life and to treat them as he would uncircumcised sinners of the Gentiles : though Jews should be unfaithful, still ' God would in all faithfulness fulfil his part of the covenant engagements and bestow eternal life ; the righteousness and veracity of God would even become more glorious by his being constant to his covenant and blessing his cho- sen people, though they should be unrighteous and false. The profane thought, even, was cherished that, even though they should be unright- eous and fiilse, God would not have fair ground for proceeding against them as sinners, since by adhering to his engagements he would have the benefit of more signally illustrating his righteousness and veracity : he would by this glorifying of himself not only have an ample equivalent, on his side, for their unfaithfulness, but even be seen in a more advan- tageous light. They flattered them- selves that they had a regard for the honor of God and seemed to cherish a fear that, by refusing to them eter- nal life, he Avould impair his own gloiy. Thus even their acknowledged ■wickedness furnished them an ad'U- tional ground for presumption. ROMANS 1 What advantage then hath the Jew ? or what profit is 2 there of circumcision ? Much, every way : chiefly, because 3 that unto them were committed the oracles of God. For what if some did not believe ? shall their unbelief 4 make the faith of God without effect? God forbid : yea, let God be true, but every man a liar ; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest over- come when thou art judged. 1. What advantage, then, hath the Jew, etc. This is the language of objection. — Wherein, then, is the Jew more favorably situated than the Gentile ? And what is the profit of circumcision'? The former of the two questions is the main one, and that which receives an answer : the second is subordinate, and did not require immediate attention. The apostle had, indeed, explicitly avow- ed, 2 : 25-29, the utter inefficacy, for acceptance with God, of outward ch'cumcision. 2. Much, every way; much, in every respect pertaining to religion. In what pertained to religion, a Jew was fai* more favorably situated than a Gentile. || Chiefly, etc. The chief point of advantage was, that the Jews were entrusted with the oracles of God; that is, his promises to Abra- ham and the other patriarchs, and all the revelations of the divine will through Moses and the prophets. 3. For ichat if some did not believe? Another objection to the apostle's views is here introduced. — Some editions of the Greek Testament j)unctuate this verse diiferently from the mode adopted in our version : the Avords believe, unbelief, faith, also, do not convey the original idea. The verse may be thus rendered : — For what? If some have been unfaithful, will their unfaithfulness make void the faithfulness of God? — Jews, gen- erally, indulged the thought that God was pledged, by his engagement with Abraliam, to bless them. Hence the query, Though some of the Jews have proved faithless, will their faith- lessness to their obligations destroy the faithfulness of God to his proni- ises 1 Though we are sinners, will God be faithless to his engage- ments ? 4. God forbid. These words are not a literal rendering of the original ; but seem to have been adopted by the translators as expressive of the pious decision with which the apostle would repel the cavilling queiy. A literal rendering Avould be. Let it not be : an expression strongly indicative of aversion and showing how abhor- rent the apostle regarded the query to every right feeling. In replying, then, to the thought advanced in ob- jection to his view, Paul repels with abhorrence the insinuation, that God would be faithless should he not save the Jews ; and at the same time, by a quotation from their own scrip- tures, maintains that in condemning the unfaithful, God would be ac- knowledged to be just. II Yea, let God be true, etc. So far from calling in question the faithfulness of God, let us hold it as a fixed principle, never to be surrendered, that God is true, of unimpeachable veracity, though every man should prove false, faithless to his engagements. || As it is written, etc. The sentiment just expressed is confirmed by a quota- tion from Ps. 51 : 4, to the effect that God will be proved- righteous in all his declarations, that, were his deal- ings brought under a judicial exam- ination, he would gain the cause and be pronounced just. — Tlie quotation from the Greek translation of tlie Hebrew scriptures is verbally diflei'- ent from the original in the Old Tes- tament, but is apposite to the pur- pose of showing that God will inva- riably be found just and true: i( CHAPTER III SB But if our unrighteousness commend the righteousness of God, what shall we say ? Is God unrighteous who taketh vengeance ? (I speak as a man.) God forbid : for then how shall God judge the world ? For if the truth of God hath more abounded through my lie unto his glory ; why yet am I also judged as a sinner ? conveys, also, the thought that, in such a trial, God would not only be cleared, but that his righteous char- acter would be triun^phantly dis- played. 5. Another objection is brought against the sentiment that Jews, as well as Gentiles, might be objects of divine wrath. It is grounded on a professed regard for the glory of God and on the assumption, that his right- eousness would be impaired should he inflict wrath on the Jews. The pui*port of it is. If the unrighteous- ness of the Jews occasion to God the advantage of signally glorifying him- self as righteous in adhering, not- withstanding their unrighteousness, to his covenant engagements and in blessing them, will God be unright- eous and, instead of bestowing on them eternal life, inflict Avrath on themi — If our unrighteousness com- mend, etc. ; if our unrighteousness set forth in a favorable light the right- eousness, or justice, of God. — The words righteousness of God, being here contrasted with our unrighteous- ness, mean the personal righteous- ness of God, and correspond to the expression in the preceding verse that thou mightest he justified, or shown to be just. II Is God unrighteous, etc. Is God, or will God be, unrigliteous and inflict wrath, instead of bestow- ing on us eternal life and thus glori- fying his righteousness in keeping his covenant? || Taketh vengeance; lit- erally, inficteth icrath. \\ I speak as a man. Tlie query was not at all expressive of the apostle's own mind : he spoke as personating anotlier, or, as some man miglit think and speak. 6. For then how shall God judqe the world? The tliought, that God is unrighteous, would be inconsistent with the belief held among the Jews, that God is to judge the world. The Judge of the world must discriminate in regard to the characters and de- serts of men ; and thus the acknowl- edged truth, that God is to judge the world, involves the idea of his per- sonal justice. 7. The cavilling objector propo- ses another queiy, similar to the one just disposed of, an illustration, in- deed, of it, but carried to a greater length : If the veracity of God in adhex'ing to his engagements be, through my falseness, more abun- dantly glorified, why am I also, a Jew whom God has engaged to bless and by blessing whom, though I be fiilse to my engagements, he may so much the more glorify his veracity, why am I also, like the sinful Gen- tile world, brouglit to trial as a sin- ner ? God would glorify his veracity by bestowing eternal life on me, though false to my engagements, and even by occasion of my falseness : why then, notwithstanding this ad- vantage to himself, am I brought to trial as a sinner ? — The truth of God; the truthfulness, or veracity, of God. II Ml/ lie; my falsehood to God, my falseness, faithlessness. II Why yet am I also judged, etc. The word also seems to refer to other per- sons who are expected to be brought to judgment ; and it may have a refei-ence to the thought, in the pre- ceding verse, that God is to judge the icoiid, since by tliis term tlie Jews meant, more particularly, the Gentile Avorld, and some of them seem to have believed that the judgment was designed solely for the Gentiles. The query of the objector may be thus presented : Why am even I, as if a sinner of the Gentiles, or as a 34 ROMANS. 8 And not rather (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say), Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just. 9 What then ? are we better than they ? No, in no wise : for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they 1 are all under sin ; as it is written, There is none righteous, no 11 not one : there is none that understandeth, there is none that 12 seeketh after God, they are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable : there is none that doeth good, sinner, like the Gentile world, still held to trial ? 8. This verse contains the reply- to the question in the seventh. The apostle seems to interrupt the cavil- ler, and bring him on a siidden to consider the extreme to which he had gone; as if the apostle had said, 'And not rather say (as ive are slan- derously reported and as some affirm that we say), Let us do evil that good may come ! Shall we say that ? ' — The original may be variously ren- dered : thus, And shall we say (as . . . some affirm that we say), that we may do evil that good may come ? — or thus, And, let us not do (as . . . some affirm we say we may do) evil that good may come. || We be slander- oushj reported, etc. Doubtless some of Paul's opponents had made such an affirmation concerning him, abus- ing perhaps some of his avowed sen- timents, and drawing from them un- authorized inferences. The senti- ment which occurs in this epistle, 5 : 20, Where sin abounded grace did much more abound, may exemplify the class of thoughts which his ad- versaries thus abused. || Whose damnation is just. This is affinned of those who act on the principle of doing evil that good may come ; not of those who reviled the apostle. Those who act thus, he solemnly affirms, will meet with a righteous condemnation. 9-18. Having shown what ad- vantage the Jew had over the Gen- tile, and disposed of the questionings which a Jew would suggest in oppo- fiition to the sentiment that he, like any sinner, was exposed to the wrath of God, the apostle now puts directly the question, whether Jews were better than Gentiles, as to the fact of being sinners. This was, in truth, the point to which he had been steadily looking. He denies that Jews are, at all, better than Gentiles in this respect : they arc both under sin, as he had already, in 1 : 18-32. 2 : 1-29, charged on them. His charge, he proceeds to show, is in harmony with the Jewish scriptures themselves. — This argument from the Jewish sci-ipturcs, doubtless, had special reference to the case of the Jews, since no one had doubts wheth- er the Gentiles were sinners, while yet the passages speak in general terms, and are evidently produced in support of the charge that Jews and Gentiles are all under sin. 9. What then, etc. What are we to conclude respecting the Jews ? Are we better than the Gentiles as to the fact of being sinners 1 Not at all : the Jews, as well as the Gen- tiles, are sinners and exposed to the penalty of sin. 1| For ice have before proved ; more correctly, We have be- fore brought the charge. 10-18. As it is written, etc. The apostle now produces passages from the Old Testament fortifying the charge which he had made ; Ps. 14 : 1-3. Ps. 5: 9. Ps. 140: 3. Ps. 10: 7. Is. 59: 7, 8. Ps. 36: 1.— II They are together beco)iie nnprof ta- ble; a mild ifbrm of saying, They are abominable, fit only to be re- jected. II Their throat is an open sepulchre. 'They send forth moraJ CHAPTER III. 35 13 no, not one : their throat is an open sepulchre ; with their tongues the J have used deceit ; the poison of asps is under 14 their lips : whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness. 15 Their feet are swift to shed blood ; destruction and miserj 17 are in their ways ; and the way of peace have they not 18 known. There is no fear of God before their eyes. 19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law ; that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God. 20 Therefore, by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law u the knowledge of sin. defilement, as an opened tomb emits noisomeness. — As in the case of the Gentiles, so here, the apostle's lan- guage docs not require, for its verifi- cation, that every Jew should have been guilty of each of these kinds of sin. It is enough, that the JcAvish world could be thus described ; that some committed one class of sins and others another, while no individual was able to escape from the charge of being a sinner : the more tender any one's conscience and the clearer his understanding of the law of God, the more ready would he be to ac- knowledge himself a sinner. 19. Having shown the sinfulness of both Jews and Gentiles, the apos- tle states anew the principle, which he had already exhibited, in 2: 11- 16, conceiTiing the condemnation of sinners and the award which will be measured out to them ; namely, that these will be regulated by their pos- session, or their lack, of the written law of God. — Now we know that what tliimis soever, etc. It is a settled point with us, that the law is of force to those who are under it, those who have it. Those who have the written law of God will be judged by it; those wlio have it not will not be judged by it : it does not speak to them. II That every mouth may he stopped, etc. ; so that eveiy sinner may feel the justice of his doom, and the whole world, Jewish and Gentile, being dinners, may be adjudged guilty in the sight of God; guilty, severally, according to a just esti- mate of advantages, and of disad- vantages, for knowing the will of God. 20. Therefore by the deeds of the lav), etc. Since all men, those under the law as well as others, are sinners, it follows that no man can be justi- fied, or treated as righteous, by deeds of the law : all hope, that any human being ban be justified by deeds of the law, is cut off ; for by the law is the knowledge of sin; the law is effica- cious only in awakening a sense of sinfulness in those who possess the law. The law of God making known his will leads to the convic- tion that we are transgressors. Thus the possibility of being justified by the law is absolutely negatived. — As the apostle has Jews particularly in his mind, the law is to be taken in its whole extent, both ceremonial and moral, for to a Jew the distinction between the moral law and the cere- monial was of no account. Judaism, or the Mosaic religion, consisted of the entire code of divine prescriptions given through Moses, 'relative to ritual services as well as to the affec- tions of the heart; and t\\Q outward was regarded by Jews in general as equally important, at least, with the inward, since the whole rested on divine command. Every precept of the law was a demand for pious obe- dience, and every compliance with 56^ ROMANS. 21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is man- ifested, being witnessed by tlie law and the prophets ; even 22 the righteousness of God, which is by faith of Jesus Christ the law was held as an act of obedi- ence to a divine command. The performance of a required ceremony was, in a Jew's esteem, a pious act, an instance of obedience to God, as well as any personal, or social, vir- tue. Tlie apostle, then, covers the whole ground ; he presents, also, a conclusion, which is as wide spread- ing as law itself, in reference to the human family. 21-26. The apostle now asserts that while justification cannot result from the law, since the law produces only the consciousness of sin, God has, apart from the law, made known a kind of righteousness which he ac- cepts for men's justification. The essential principle of this righteous- ness is faith in Jesus Christ : this righteousness is for those who be- lieve in Christ, their faith in him be- ing put to their account as righteous- ness : this righteousness is for all who believe, whether Jews or Gen- tiles, since there is no difference as to the ground of tlieir justification in the sight of God ; for both Jews and Gentiles are sinners and can be justi- fied only in a gratuitous way, by the grace, or favor, of God. Christ, in whom the faith which God accepts as righteousness is reposed, has by his expiatory death made manifest the righteousness of God's character, so that he is seen to be righteous while he accepts, and regards as righteous, the believer in Christ. 21. But now. These words are here not significant of time, but are merely a formula of transition to the contrast which the apostle is about to present. || The ricjhteonsness of God ; a righteousness which God has ap- pointed and will accept for man's jus- tification. It is called the righteous- ness of God, also, as being distin- guished from a man's own righteous- ness, that is, such as would be liis. had he obeyed the law. It also pro- ceeds from God, both because by his appointment, faith is put to the be- liever's account and because faith and the disposition connected with it result from a divine inilucnce on man's heart. i| Without tlie law; aside from the law, on a different ground from that which the law can present, the law being set aside as a ground for justification and contri- buting nothing to that result. || Be- ing witnessed, etc. ; being testified of in the Old Testament. In 4: 1-8 the apostle produces from that book in- stances of a righteousness not consist- ing in actual obedience to the law. Compare the quotation in 1 : 17. — When the apostle said in verse 20, By the law is the knowledge of sin, he did not express a sentiment in opposition to that which he affirms in this verse, since the word law is not there em- ployed in the wide sense of the ex- pression laiv and jji'ophets. He there referred simply to the effect of the law of God on the human conscience and to the certainty that men cannot obtain justification through it. In the present passage, he afhrms that even the Old Testament contains proofs of a righteousness which does not consist in obedience to the law, but which, notwitlistanding, can be put to a man's account for his justifi- cation and secure for him acceptance with God. 22. By faith of Jesus Christ. Faith in Christ is the medium through which a person is brought into this state of justification, that faith being put to his account, or reckoned to him, as righteousness ; so that, through it, he is as really accepted of God as if he had not been a sin- ner, il Ui^to all and upon all, etc. There is but little, if any, difference in meaning between these two prepo- sitions, unto and upon, as here used. CHAPTER III. 87 23 unto all, and upon all them that believe ; for there is no dif- 24 ference : for all have sinned, and come short of the glorj of God ; beino; justified freely by his grace, through the re- 25 demption that is in Christ Jesus ; whom God hath set forth to he a propitiation, through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of ^ins that are past, through Paul occasionally employs a twofold method of expression with, perhaps, a shade of difference between the words, but chiefly for the sake of more fully and emphatically conveying his idea. Compare 1 : 17. 3 : 30. II For there is no difference : no differ- ence between Jcav and Gentile, be- tween one man and another, in regard to the righteousness which is revealed for men's justification. All are situ- ated alike in this respect : all are to be treated alike, as occupying com- mon ground : one and the same mode of justification is requii-ed for all. 23. For all have sinned. No dif- ference exists betAveen Jew and Gen- tile in regard to the mode of justifi- cation, because all alike are sinners : not that all are equally sinful, but all are really sinners, and therefore all must, if justified, or accepted, be jus- tified on a different principle from that of obedience to the law of God. II And come short of the glory of God; are destitute of that glory which Cometh from God. However much any may be esteemed, and have glory, among their fellow men, yet they fall short of, are destitute of, that glory which God bestOAvs on beings who have not violated his laws. The glory here mentioned is the praise, or ap- proval, which God ever gives to those with whose characters he is pleased : and the word, here used, in the original, is the same as in John 5 : 44, How can ye believe who re- ceive honor, gloiy, one of another, and not the honor, glor}-, Avliich cometh from God only; and in John 12 : 43, For they loved the praise, glory, of men more than tlie praise of God. 24. Being jnstified freely ; not on the ground of their deservings, but gratuitously ; receiving justification as a gift, not as a recompense for obedience to the law of God. jj By his grace; by the tender mercy of God, not through their own desert : they cannot claim justification on their own account ; it is gratuitously bestOAved on them as a matter of favor, or kindness. || Through the redemp- tion that is in Christ Jesus. Christ has procured redemption, deliver- ance, from the condemnation due to them as sinners, having given him- self as a ransom, 1 Tim. 2 : 6. By virtue of his death, as a consideration meeting all the demands of the case, those Avho believe in him are re- deemed, rescued, from condemnation and the penalty of sin. Compai-e Matt. 20 : 28. Is. 53 : 10. 25. Whoin God hath set forth to be a propitiation ; whom God hath set forth as a propitiatory offering, an expia- tory victim, by virtue of whose death he might treat men propitiously, and bestow on them pardoning mercy, without impairing the claims of his righteous law. It is in this view of Christ, as an expiatory offering de- signed to effect reconciliation between God and men, that he is called the Lamb of God, taking away the sin of the world. John 1 : 29. Com- pare also 1 John 2 : 2. Eph. 5 : 2. Heb. 9: 15, 2G. 1 Pet. 1 : 18, 19. II Through faith in his blood ; through faith in his death ; that is, through faith in him as having shed his blood, or undergone a violent death. The faith Avhich secures justification is here represented as referring specially to the death of Christ, or to him as haA'ing suffered death in our behalf, his death being necessary to the pro- piation. — Some editions' of the ori*g- 38 ROMANS. 26 the forbearance of God : to declare, / say, at this time his righteousness ; that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. inal give a different punctuation _and connect the -words in his blood with the word propitiation ; thus, a propi- tiotion in, that is, by, his blood. No material difference in the thought, however, is produced by this alter- ation : for in either mode of reading the passage, the death of Christ is represented as necessary and avail- able for propitiation, and faith in Christ is represented as the medium for receiving the benefits of his pro- pitiatoiy death. 1| To declare his righteousness ; literally, for showing forth his own righteousness, or, for making it manifest. — Tlie Avord de- clare is here used, as in 1 : 4, in the old sense of making clear, or evident; as it is used in Matt. 13 : 36 and 15 : 15. II For the remission of sins that are past ; literally, on account of the remission, that is, the passing by, without merited punishment, of sins committed in former ages, namely, before the coming of Christ. — The word here translated remission is not the Avord Avhich signifies forgiveness in the full sense ; it pi'operly means passing by luithout deserved retribution, declining to punish. The idea, here conveyed by the apostle, is similar to that in Acts 17 : 30, where God is said to have icinked at sins committed in the times of comparative ignorance, and in Acts 14 : 16, where he is said to have suffered all nations to walk in their own Avays, without giving full expression to his displeasure at their sins. Tiie sins of former ages AA-ere passed by Avithout merited punish- ment through the divine forbearance, not through indifference on the part of God. Since, howeA^er, God had shown such forbeai-ance in declining to punish the sins of men, his for- bearance might be misunderstood, and the opinion be cherished that lie was regardless of men's acts and would not be found strictly just in his moral administration. But the death of Christ, as a means of pro- pitiation, Avould effectually correct this en-or : it AA'ould fully display the justice of God and set all his former forbearance in its true light. — In order to present the apostle's thought, the passage may be read in the fol- loAving mfyiner : — For showing forth his own righteousness on account of the passing by, through the forbearance of God, of sins formerly committed. The apostle's remark is applicable to modern times ; for the righteousness of God might be called in question by reason of his forbearing to inflict merited punishment in his providen- tial dealings ; but his righteousness is fully A'indicated by the death of Christ for man's redemption. 26. To declare, I say, at this time, etc. ; a repetition of the thought that the death of Christ manifested the righteousness of God, AAith the addi- tional thought that this is done now, at the present time, that is, since Christ lias come and submitted to death, in contrast Avith the former ages alluded to in the preceding vt rse. A complete manifestation of the right- eous character of God, as the su- preme Ruler, Avas resened for the Messiah's adA'ent and death. || 2'hat he might be just, etc. The ultimate purpose of the death of Christ is noAV stated, at least so far as men's justification is concerned ; namely, that God might be seen to be per- fectly righteous aa'IuIc even justifying men, that is, accepting them as if righteous, though sinners, on their becoming believers in Jesus. Tlie death of Christ should be re- garded not so mucli in the light of an external extent, as in the ideas it rep- resents, or the A'iews Avhich it fur- nishes of the character and go\'ern- ment of God. We are not to sup- pose that God takes pleasure iii <>uf- CHAPTER III. 27 Where is boasting then ? It is exckided. By what law ? 28 Of works ? Nay ; but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of fering, or in tlie shedding of blood : this would be abhorrent to the spirit- uality of his nature and to his tender- ness ; but tlie efficacy of Christ's death consists, so far as the apostle shows in this paragraph, in Its so man- ifesting the righteous character of God that, though he pardon and ac- cept the sinner wlio believes in Jesus, he cannot justly be suspected of any dereliction of righteousness. But how did his death thus show forth the righteousness of God ? In reply : His death was vicarious ; he died the just for the unjust, 1 Pet. 3 : 18 ; that is, tlie righteous one in behalf of the unrighteous ; he bore their sins in his own body on the cross, 1 Pet. 2 : 24, in their stead, the Lord having laid on him the iniquity of us all, Is. 53 : 6 ; and thus, in liis unmeasurable, in- conceivable sufferings endui'ed in con- sequence of his taking on himself our sins, we have a demonstration of God's righteous hatred of sin and of the ill desert of sinners ; namely, their deserving to be abandoned of God to an unutterable depth of miseiy. In view then, of this dreadful and signi- ficant death, undergone for us, God can righteously avert from us our merited doom if we come to possess a temper of mind suitable to our case, that is, a penitent temper, and with all our heart accede to the view which God takes of us and of himself, con- fiding, with entire self-renunciation, in Christ, and becoming his followers, united in spirit with him. — The faith in Chrijit to which so much impor- tance is attached may be either the specific conscious act of trusting in Cln-ist from a deep sense of our per- sonal siufulness and need of ))ardon, or the state of moral feeling w'.iich is involved in disciplcsliip to jesus : for, the specitic act will be followed by entire discipleship, and discipleship, riewed as a moral state, involves the personal trusting in Christ as the Redeemer. Faith, viewed as a speci- fic act, is also the germ of entire Christian character and obedience. 27-30. In these verses the apostle infers that the boasting, in which the Jews indulged, of their superiority to the Gentiles, in consequence of then* possessing the Mosaic law, must now be i-egarded as baseless. Since, also, it was the design of God to abolish the distinction between Jew and Gentile, in regard to privileges, the fact, that justification by faith for both Jews and Gentiles does effectually remove the Jewish ground of self-estimation, may furnish in its turn confirmation to the doctrine that justification stands connected with faith, not with works of the law. This doctrine is, more- over, in harmony with the fact that there is but one God, who is the God of the Gentiles, as well as of the Jews. 27. Where is boasting, then ? Lit- erally, the boasting, the well-known glorying of the Jews over the Gen- tiles as being so highly distinguished by God in the privilege of being his people and having his law. — Through- out his discussion, the apostle keeps the Jews before his mind : the reason- ing is conducted with special reference to them, li Bi/ lohat law 1 By what rule, or governing principle ? || Of works ? By the principle that works of obedience to the law will avail for men's justification ? The Jews lield to this principle, and hence boasted in their outward distinction from the Gentiles, as having the law, or the religious institution by Moses. || Bat bij the law of faith, by the i-ule, or governing principle, that faith in Christ avails for justification. This leaves no room for personal glorying, since it places justification on the ground of a free gift, not of a de- served payment, or of a reward. 28. Therefore we conclude, etc. Since justification by faith in Christ 40 ROMANS. 29 30 31 the law. Is he the God of the Jews only ? is he not also of the Gentiles ? Yes, of the Gentiles also : seeing it is one God which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith. Do we then make void the law through faith ? God for- bid : yea, we establish the law. excludes self-glorying:, and thus ef- fects the purpose of God to place all men on a common level, we deem that a man is justified by faith aside from the deeds of the law ; the ob- servances of the law contribute noth- ing to our justification. 29, Is he the God of the Jews only ? That faith in Christ, and not the observance of the Mosaic law, is re- quired for justification, and conse- quently that no difference exists be- tween Jews and Gentiles in this respect, is also in harmony with the truth that there is but one God, and he must be acknowledged the God of the Gentiles as well as of the Jews ; having a regard for the one as well as for the other. But if justification come from the Mosaic law, then God would be exclusively the God of the Jews, to the detriment of the Grentiles who had not received that law : being, however, the God of all men in com- mon, he has established that principle of justification wliich is equally ap- plicable to all and available for all. He justifies the circumcision, the Jews, by faith, and the uncircumcision, the Gentiles, by faith. — No essential dif- ference in meaning is intended by using the different prepositions by and through. It is an instance of tlie apostle's practice, which has already been noticed, on verse 22 ; compare too, in the original, verses 25 and 26. If the prepositions, in this verse, were rendered in a strictly literal manner, the representation would be that justification comes to believing Jews from faith, as its source; and to believing Gentiles I)y, or throwjh, faith, as its medium. The apostle's mind fastened on faith as the principal word. In the paragraph just considered, vs. 27-30, the apostle proceeded on what he held as an indisputable tnith, which he inculcated, also, on all proper occasions, that the distinction between Jews and Gentiles was no longer to be regarded : the gospel placed them both on a common level. Compare Eph. 2: 11-17. They were, in common, men and sinners ; and one common principle was to be applied in their deliverance from a common state of sin and exposure to divine wrath. 31. Do ice then make void the law, etc. The apostle here replies to a query which would naturally arise, in a Jew's mind, from the doctrine that obedience to the Mosaic law is not the ground of justification, but that justi- fication depends on faith in Christ. This doctrine involves the sentiment that Gentiles, as Avell as Jews, are graciously regarded by God, and that Jews have no just ground for boast- ing of superiority to Gentiles. It might seem to a Jew, that this denial to him of any ground of boasting was a depreciation and a virtual renuncia- tion of the law of Moses, that is, of the religious system of Moses. Hence the query. Do we, then, by this doctrine of faith invalidate the law? With tlie ut- most positiveness and Avith a solemnity which shows how utterly abhorrent was such a thought to all his religious convictions and feelings, he replies, that, so far from making void the law by this principle of justification, he does in fact confirm it. — From Acts 21 : 21, 28, it is clear that Paul was believed by large numbers of the con- verted Jews, as well as of the uncon- verted, to be unfriendly to the law of Moses. This supposed hostility on his part to the Mosaic religion was emplo}'ed by his adversaries to defeat CHAPTER III. 41 his efforts for promoting the gospel. If the Mosaic religion must be re- garded, as it doui)tless was by Jews in general, as designed for the justi- fication of men by obedience to the works it enjoined, he wouhl indeed be opposed to it ; but tliis he held to be an eiToneous view of it. So far as man's justification is concerned, he held tliat the law could not accom- plish it, but that it must come through Clirist, Compare 10: 5. Gal. 2: 16. 3: 10-14. Viewing the religion of Moses in its proper design an.d re- lations, he ri>garded it with reverence and gratitude. Acts 24: 14, 1.5. He could with the utmost sincerity aver, that he would by no means weaken it, if it were apprehended ac- cording to its real design ; and that his Christian views went to confirm it, as a revelation of the eternal and immutable principles of piety. But in wliat manner his views confirmed the law, he does not here say. Per- haps lie intended, by making a strong asseveration, to show distinctly his conviction, that the doctrine of justi- fication by faith, though it utterly removes the Jews' ground of boast- ing, is not at variance with the reli- gion of ]\Ioses, and thus to disabuse his Jewish readers' minds of tlie hurt- ful prejudice which had been indulged, leaving his solemn aA'erment to the considerate regard of his readers. Opinions as to the manner in which the apostle's doctrine confirms the law are various. Three only need be mentioned : 1. It confii-ms the law viewed particularly in its moral as- pects, since it acknowledges the law as awakening a sense of sin ; it is thus built on the law as an imnmtable basis of moral right. If Ave were not under condemnation by the law, a gratuitous justification would not be needed : hence, this doctrine in- volves the binding and inevitable authority of tlie hiw. — The distinc- tion, here implied, between the moral and the ritual in the Mosaic law, was not made by Jews generally, (see on verse 20) ; since they regarded the entire law, in all its parts, as resting equally on one and the same basis of divine command, and considered all acts of comi)liance with it as religious obedience, entitling to recompense. They did not discriminate between the law as enjoined on tlieir nation through Moses, and tlie eternal and un- changeahle laic designed for all moral created beings, which formed the basis of their peculiar national code. An enlightened Jew, however, could not but feel that in spirit, at least, he had not kept the whole law ; and there- fore, however broadly he might use tlie word law, the law would convict him of sin and make him feel his need of a different basis for accept- ance -ttith God. The disclosure of an adequate basis would confirm the law, since the necessity of it was oc- casioned by the inviolable force of the law. — 2. This doctrine confirms the law, because it is only by the effi- cacy of the provision which this doc- trine presents, that the real intent of the law, as requiring a moral dispo- sition conformed to the will of God, can be fulfilled among men. See 8 T 4. This doctrine, tl'.en, maintains the law as the authoritative expression of what is right in the sight of God, and aims to accomplish the results con- templated by the law. — 3. The law, viewed as the religion of Moses pre- sented in the Old Testament, is con- firmed by this doctrine, because this doctrine is really contained in that religion. So far, then, from giving" up the law as developed in the Jew- ish scrijitures themselves, we derive proofs of this doctrine from those very scriptures, and therefore by no means invalidate the law. — The last of these views is regarded by some writers as being in harmony with the apostle's employing, in the following chapter, as proofs of his doctrine, instances funiished by the Old Testament. This view, however, is not satisfac- toiy. — Perhaps the apostle's remark should be classed among the very comprehensive ones, which are capa- ble of diverse replies, according W CHAPTER IV. The ?ase of Abraham, as suggpsting an objection. 1-8. Ills acceptance with God not rest- in ^ on obedience to the law of circumcision, but ou faith, 9-17. Commendation of Abra- ham's faith in God, 18-22. The principle on which he was justified, applicable to all, 23-25. the diverse points of view which a reader takes. Each reply, in such a case, may be worthy of acceptance; thougli, doubtless, some one should be considered the main I'eply, and others coincident and subservient. CHAPTER IV. The conclusion to which the apos- tle had conducted his readers, that acceptance with God is dependent on faith in Clnist, and the idea, that this mode of justification effectually re- moves all ground of boasting, would naturally, since the Jews were veiy prone to boast, lead a Jew to men- tion the case of Abraham as opposing a strong objection to the apostle's doctrine. Abraham was a man of singular obedience to the will of God, Gen. 26 : 5 ; yet, according to the apostle's view, he had no claim on God. A Jew, then, would naturally ask, 'According to this view, what did Abraham obtain from his works of obedience ? Did he have even the slightest ground for self-gratulation 1 ' The question, obviously, involves a negative answer. The apostle takes for granted the negative answer, and proceeds to show its propriety. Granting that Abraham had a ground for self-gratulation if he were justified by works, Paul asserts that he had no such ground in the sight of God. That he had no such ground for glorying in tlie sight of God, the apostle argues from the statement of the scripture that faith, not a legal obedience, was reckoned to Abraham as righteousness. — That a righteous- ness aside from works is reckoned to the man whom God accepts, appears, in like manner, from tlie language of David, who describes a person as (42) blessed that had confessedly been guilty of sin, but is, notwithstanding, accepted of God, his sin not being put to his account. Vs. 1-8. Now, does this state of blessedness depend on being circumcised ? No : for Abraham was justified in the sight of God before he was circumcised, and circumcision was the seal., or the confirmation, of the fiict that his faith was set to his account as righteous- ness. Thus it was that Abraham became the father of all believers, both uncircumcised and circumcised. Vs. 9-12. As Abraham was to be the father of all believers, a promise Avas vir- tually made to him that he should possess the entire world, Gentiles and Jews. Now this promise to Abraham was not made through the medium of the law, but through the medium of faith, or through the medium of that righteousness Avhich was reck- oned to faith. If tlie fulfilment of this promise had been dependent on the law, fiiith would then have been invalidated, which yet is plainly the ground of the promise, and the prom- ise would inevitably have failed. For if its fulfilment had been made de- pendent on obedience to the law, the condition would not have been com- plied with : the law would have been broken and divine- wrath, instead of a fulfilment of the promise, would have ensued. In order, therefore, that the promise might be surely ful- filled, it must rest on the ground of a gratuity : hence, faith is the appointed medium. Vs. 13-17. As Abraham's faith was reckoned to him for righteousness, so will our faith be put to our accoun*". as right- eousness, and secure to us justification in the sight of God. Vs. 18-25, CHAPTER IV. 48 1 What shall we then say that Abraham our father, as per- 2 taming to the flesh, hath found? For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory, but not before 3 God. For what saith the scripture ? Abraham believed 4 God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. Now to him that worketli, is the reward not reckoned of grace, 5 but of debt. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on 1. What shall we say, then, that Abraham, etc. The arrangement of the woi-ds in tlie original does not connect the clause, as pertaining to the Jlesh, with Abraham our father, but with hath found. The following ex- presses the view of the original : What shall we say, then, that Abraham our father found as pertaining to the flesh, or, according to the flesh ? — Ac- cording to the flesh would seem, from the immediate connection, to have signified the performance oficorks, per- haps as distinguished in the apostle's mind from the inicard spirit of faith. Among such works of obedience, cir- cumcision was included. — The ques- tion here proposed by the apostle, as a thought that would naturally occur to a Jew, involves a negative reply ; as if a person should inquire, with surprise, * "VSHiat then, according to this view of justification, are we to think that even Abi-aham received as the reward of his deeds 1 What one tiling does it allow him to have obtained ? ' The apostle may be con- ceived of as tacitly assenting to the negative here involved, namely, that Abraham did indeed obtain no* bless- ing, as a deserved recompense of deeds. 2. He now proceeds to sustain this negative reply. — For. This word connects the implied negative -with the argument on Avliich the apostle grounds it : as if he had said, Abra- ham obtained nothing in respect to justification, in consequence of his works ; for, if he had, he would have possessed some ground for glorying ; but, in the sight of God, he had no Buch ground. Whatever merits in the sight of men, and when compared with men, he may have, before God he has no gi'ound for gloiying. 3. The reason for denying to Abraham any title for glorying before God, is now presented : namely, the scripture rests his justification on his faith, not on his works ; and faith, as the medium of justification, implies, on the part of the justified person, a gratuitous reception of blessings. — What saith the scripture 9 See Gen. 15:6. II Abraham believed God; re- posed faith in God, who had made him such a promise as could not be fully admitted by him without a gen- uine, unwavering confidence in God. II And it ivas counted unto him for right- eousness ; it was put to his account as righteousness, so that he was thereby justified, or treated as righteous. 4. The apostle now shows how entirely adverse is this scripture-lan- guage, concerning Abraham, to the opinion that he was justified by Avorks. To have faith put to a person's ac- count as righteousness is applicable, he says, only to the case of one who is not regarded as righteous by virtue of his own works. — To him that work- eth, etc. ; to one who by his own works is accounted righteous, the recompense is not reckoned of grace, that is, as a gratuity, a favor, bestowed through kindness, but as a debt, as something due to him on the ground of justice. 5. To him that icorJceth not, etc. ; to one who is not by virtue of h:s own works accounted righteous, but who is characterized as reposing trust in liim that justifieth the ungodlg, that is, justifieth a man that has been a sinner and is therefore without claim, to such a person his faith is reckoned^ 44 ROMANS, him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for right- 6 eousness. Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth righteousness without 7 works, saying^ Blessed are thej whose iniquities are for- 8 given, and whose sins are covered ; blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. 9 Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or counted, as righteousness. Now Abraham is characterized as having thus reposed faith in God, and hav- ing been, in consequence, justified. Righteousness was, therefoi-e, not reckoned, or counted, to him as a result of works, and consequently he had not a ground of glorying in the sight of God. — The apostle's idea in the 4th and 5th verses may also be thus expi'essed : To a person who has peiformed required works, and thus satisfied the conditions of the law, the recompense is not a matter of favor, or a gratuity (and therefore, not dependent on faith; see verse 16), but a matter of debt. It is to a pei'son who has not performed the works of the law, but who trusts to Him who can treat as righteous one that is confessedly a sinner, it is only to such a person that his faith is reck- oned as righteousness. The reckon- ing of faith as righteousness is incon- sistent with the reckoning of ivorks as righteousness. Abraham, therefore, since faith was put to his account as righteousness, had a righteousness aside from works, a righteousness resting on a diff"erent ground. 6. Even as David also describeth, etc. In harmony with this representa- tion concerning Abraham, is David's language concerning the blessed state of the man to wliom God i-eckous righteousness witkout ivorks, that is, aside from works, or on a different ground from that of works ; to wliose account God puts righteousness, and whom he accepts as if rigliteous, though he has not a righteousness founded on his own works. — The word imputtth, in this vei'se, represents precisely the same word in the orig- inal, as is, in the preceding verses, translated count and reckon. These three words are, in our version, used in the same sense. 7, 8. Blessed, etc. See Ps. 32 : 1, 2. The force of this quotation con- sists in the fact, that a blessed, or happy, state in respect to God is here represented as enjoyed by a man who yet had been confessedly sinful, and who could not, therefore, have been accepted on the ground of personal righteousness, but on the ground of mere favoi', God not charging his sins to his account. His blessed state was to him not a matter of deU, which he could claim, but of grace, coming to him as a gratuity, a free gift. God might have justly imputed sin to him ; that is, might have put his sin to his account, but he graciously fore- bore to do so. 9-17. The apostle now more par- ticularly shows that this blessed state does not rest on the ground of the law, but on that of grace ; that it proceeds not from a legal obedience on the part of the person who is thus blessed, but from grace on the part of God. He maintains that it did not, in the case of Abraliarft, depend on circumcision, nor on the law at all. 9. Cometh, then'? etc. Is this state of blessedness affirmed of the cir- cumcised only, as the Jews main- tained, or of the uncircumcised also ? The very form of this question shows how the subject stood in the apostle's mind, and indicates tlie proper reply; namely, it is affirmed of the uncircum- cised also. To establish this implied affirmative answer to tlie second part of the question, the apostle remarks, For we say that faith was reckoned ta CHAPTER IV. 45 or upon the uncir3umcision also ? For we say that faith was 10 reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. How was it then reckoned ? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumci- 11 sion? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised : that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised, (that righteousness might be imputed unto 12 them also,) and the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps ABRAHAM as rujhteousness. An unreflecting Jew might hastily infer that Abraham's justification was, of course, connected with circumcision ; but this very instance of Abraham makes the contrary evident, as the apostle proceeds to show. 10. How icas it then reckoned'? In what circumstances was Abraham, when his faith was put to his account as righteousness 1 Was he circum- cised, or uncircumcised 1 He was, at that time, uncircumcised ; and, there- fore, circumcision bore no pax't in his justification before God. 11. And he received the sign, etc. In addition to the historical fact that Abraham was held rigliteous in the sight of God, or was justified, pre- viously to his circumcision, the very design of circumcision, in respect to Abraham, shows tliat his justification was not dependent on it. It was after he was justified through his faith, that he received the sign, or mark of circumcision as a seal, that is, in confirmation, of the fact that God accepted as righteousness the foith which he had reposed in God, while he was yet uncircumcised. || That he might be the father, etc. ; so that he miglit be the father, in a spiritual sense, of all uncircumcised believers, to wliom, as well as to himself, on account of their being believers, or on account of their having ftiith, righteousness is reckoned ; in other words, to whom their faith is reckoned as rigliteousness, and who are thereby justified. 12. And the father of circumcision ; that is, the father of the circumcised, the Jews : yet not of all who are cir- cumcised, but of tliose only among them who, like him, have faith. This discrimination is immediately ex- pressed. II To tliem who are not of the circumcision only, etc. ; rather, for, in respect to, those, who sliould be not merely circumcised, but who should, also, partake of Abraham's faith, the faith which he reposed in the divine declaration while he was yet uncir- cumcised. — Abraham became a sph'- itual father of believing Gentiles and of believing Jews. The paternal re- lation of Abraham to his lineal pos- terity, or to those who merely by circumcision avowed their connection with him, was, to the apostle, of no account in respect to justification. He does not here allow to such this kindredship with Abraham : only per- sonal faith constituted one a descend- ant, or child, with Abraham. So our Lord, in John 8 : 39, etc. Compare also Gal. 6: 15. Luke 3 : 8, 9. From Gen. 17 : 1-14 it appears, that God enjoined circumcision on Abraham at a time subsequent to the occasion on Avhicli his faith, Gen. 15 : 6, was so signally accepted. This ordinance, however, appointed at a later date as the seal of God's cove- nant with Abi-aham, lind direct refer- ence to his former belief, or faith, in God's declarations ; so that without this faitli, that covenant would not have been made. Tlic apostle seems to have conjoined this covenant and the faitli of Abraham, and to have regarded the confirmatoiy design of 46 EOMANS. of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet 13 uncircumcised. For the promise that he should be the heir of the world was not to Abraham, or to his seed, through the circumcision as relating not only to the promise itself of a numerous pos- terity, but also to Abraham's faith in God. This Avas the more natural, since the promise, belief in which v/as so acceptable to God, had reference to Abraham's immediate and remote posterity, and the covenant of cir- cumcision had reference, in like man- ner, to his succeeding and remote posterity. The promises on the two occasions were the same, so far as numerousness of posterity Avas con- cerned ; and the confirmation, or seal, of the latter did really involve the confirmation of the former, and Avas, therefore, a confirmation of God's haAung accepted, as righteousness, the faith Avhich Abraham reposed in his promise. 13-17. As still further shoAving that faith is the medium of accept- ance Avith God, the apostle maintains that the promise to Abraham and his spiritual posterity concerning their possession of the Avorld, Avas depend- ent on faith, and could have been ac- complished through no other medium than a gratuitous one, such as faith is. 13. For. The apostle proceeds to state a reason for the preceding vicAV, that Abraham Avas, by his faith, to be the father of belicA'crs in all nations. Gentiles and JeAvs. The reason is, that the distinguished prom- ise to Abraham Avas not made through the medium of the laAV, but through the medium of faith reckoned as rif/ht- eousness. || The promise that he should be the heir of the world. The original AA'ord translated heir is not used AAith so strict a meaning in the scriptures as the word heir is Avith us ; it does not necessarily involve the idea of obtaining possession by descent, or by bequest from a former owner ; but signifies, likewise, possessor in the generic sense, one Avho has acquired, or obtained, something. It is so used in this passage ; and the clause might be rendered, that he should he the pos- sessor of the ivorld. The ivorld here means the earth and its inhabitants. Abraham Avas to possess these. HoAv 1 By there being multitudes throughout the earth, in CA^eiy nation, Avho should look up to him, as their common spiritual father. From him Avas to descend the Messiah, Avhose blissful reign AA'ould extend over the Avhole earth. In Gen. 15: 18-21. 17:8, the possession of the land of Canaan and of extensive neighboring countries Avas promised to Abraham ; in Gen. 15: 5, 22: 17, (compare also 17 : 4-6), it was promised that his posterity should be innumerable ; in Gen. 12: 3. 18: 18. 22: 18, that all nations should be blessed through him. The promises, vicAved con- jointly, involved the idea, that the Avhole Avorld Avas in reaUty embraced in them. The Avorld Avas to belong to Abraham and his posterity in a sense substantially the same as we intend Avhen aa'c say, the Avorld is to be overspread A\'ith Christians and they are to possess it. Thus the Avhole Avorld Avas to be Abraham's, the sphere throughout Avhich he Avould be acknoAvledged as a father, and throughout AA'hich the Messiah, the distinguished One of his posterity, Avould diffuse blessings. — This prom- ise, according to the vicAV Avhich the apostle here takes of it, had reference to the spiritual posterity of Abraham, as AA^ell as to Abraham himself; and in reference to l)otli, it may have had a twofold signification : firr-t, Abra- ham Avas to possess the world, since by the Avorld's coming under the SAvay of the religion of whicli he Avas to be SO eminent an instrument, he AA'ould have a sort of spiritual posses- sion, or dominion, in all nations : his posterity, too, Avould possess the world, inasmuch as his spiritual cl>U- CHAPTER IV. 47 14 law, but through the righteousness of faith. For if they which are of the law be heirs, faith is made void, and the 15 promise made of none effect. Because the law worketh 16 wrath : for where no law is there is no transgression. There- fore it is of faith, that it might he by grace ; to the end the promise might be sure to all the seed : not to that only which dren, the followers of Christ, would overspread the world, and the prin- ciples of their religion supplant those of every other. Secondly : The pos- session of the world is indicative of dignity and bliss ; and the eminence and happiness, thus represented, era- braced all the spiritual and immortal blessings which God Avould bestow on his favored ones. This view of the promise is applicable both to Abraham and to his spiritual pos- terity ; and thus viewed, the promise is of the same nature as that which frequently occurs concerning the righteous ; namely, they shall inherit the earth ; in other words, they shall possess the truly good things of earth, tme happiness, a blessed state. II Not throitf/h the law ; the law, or legal obedience, was not the medium through which this promise came, and the fulfilment of this promise was not, therefore, made to depend on legal obedience. |i Bnt through the righteousness of faith ; faith, accepted as righteousness, was the medium through which this promise came. 14. That the fulfilment of the promise to Abraham and his spiritual posterity is dependent on faith, arises not merely from a view of historical dates in reference to Abraham, and from the design of circumcision, but also from the very nature of the law, or of a system of legal requirements. This the apostle next presents, as sus- taining the affirmation in the 13th verse. — For, etc. : for, if they are to inherit the promise who are of the law, who possess the law, and seek the promised blessings //wn the law as the recompense of their obedience, then faith is made void, has no efficacy as to securing the fulfilment of the promise ; faith as a condition of the blessing, is done away with, as being inconsistent with a legal obedience and a consequent claim. Faith, as the medium, is wholly opposite to legal obedience, as the medium ; and consequently, if legal obedience be made the medium, faith is annulled : and then, what will be the inevitable result as to the promise 1 || The promise made of none effect ; the prom- ise is, then, virtually annulled, it has become fruitless ; it must fail entu'ely of accomplishment. 15. Because the law tvorketh wrath. The promise, were its fulfilment con- ditioned on legal obedience, Avould inevitably fail ; because the law, as acting on human beings, brings to them, not the fulfilment of the prom- ise, but the wrath of God ; since they will break the law, and transgression of it demands the penalty. Such is the moral state of men, that, if we seek for freedom from transgression, we must search for it where the law is not. The law must, therefore, be a medium of divine wrath ; and the pi'omise, if resting on that ground, must fail ; for the law enjoins duty alone, it provides not deliverance from the penalty for disobedience. — The inevitable result, that human beings will transgress under law, is else- where shown by the apostle. In 3 : 20 the law is said to occasion a con- sciousness of transgression ; in 5: 13, 20, to inci-ease accountability and occasions of sin ; and in 7 : 7, etc., to awaken and even stimulate men's sinful propensities, rather than to free from them. 16. Thei-efore it is of faith, etc. Hence the inheritance, or the posses- sion of the promised blessings, is made dependent on faith, in order that it might be according to grace. 48 ROMANS. 17 18 is of the law, but to that also which is of the faith of Abra- ham, who is the father of us all, (as it is written, I have made thee a father of many nations) before him whom he be- lieved, even God, who quickeneth the dead, and calleth those things which be not, as though they were : who against hope believed in hope, that he might become the father of many nations ; (according to that which was spoken ; So Since the promised blessings could not be secured through a legal medium, God has appointed a gracious medium : through faith the blessings are to be received. Faith was appointed as the medium of a gracious bestowal, in order that the promise might prove sure to the entire spiritual posterity of Abraham ; not only to that part which possessed the law, namely, the Jews, but also to that whicli, not having the law, yet had ftxith such as Abraham's, who, by his faith, is the spiritual fudier of us all Avho have faith, Jews and Gentdes, trusting, as he also did, to the declarations of God. 17. As it is ivritten, etc. This idea of Abraham's being the father of all believers agrees Avith God's declaration to him, in Gen. 17:5, concerning his becoming a father of many nations ; the numcrousness of his natural posterity being a fore- tokening of the innumerable multi- tude, out of all nations, that should follow him in .faith. \\ Before him, etc. These words are to be connected with the preceding verse : Abraham is father of all believers, before God, that is, in the view of God in whom he trusted. God thus regards him. II Who quickeneth the dead; who mak- eth alive the dead : a recognition of the almighty power of God, Allu- sion is, probably, made to the thought in the 19th verse, Avhich would natu- rally have forbidden the expectation of a posterity from Abraham : but this thought connects itself with the more general one of God's having power even to make the dead alive, and of Abraham's trusting to God as an almighty Being. || And calleth, etc. ; calleth forth, and disposeth of, things which are not yet in being, as though they were ; through his al- mighty creative power, he gives order concerning things not yet in existence, just as if ^hey were in existence, for his purposes concei-ning thetn will stand. It is immaterial to him, whe- ther they are now in existence, or are to be ; he foresees every thing, and has power to accomplish whatever he pleases. The future lies before hira as really as the present. Nothing is beyond his power. He is able to make promises concerning a remote future, just as easily as concerning time near at hand. Abraham trusted in him as being thus ])Owerful and faithful, and unhesitatingly believed the divine promise. 18-22. The remai-kable strength of Abraham's faith is now shown by the apostle. The patriarch trusted in the declarations of God, as the Almighty and as, therefore, able to ac- complish whatever He should please, though in circumstances, to human view, the most forbidding. 18. Who against hope, etc.; who though all natural circumstances were adverse to hope, yet in hope believed the promise of God, that he should become a father of many nations, of an innumerable posterity. || Accord- ing to that which ivas spoken, etc. ; in accordance with God's declaration to him, when bidding him look toward heaven and number the stars, he said. So shall thy seed be. Gen. 15 : 5. A similar declaration is recorded in Gen. 13 : 16. 22 : 17. Compare also Heb. 11 : 12. 19. He considered not, etc.; he paid no regai'd to the circumstance CHAPTER IV. 49 19 shall thy seed be,) and being not weak in faith, he considered not his own body now dead, when he was about a hundred 20 years old, neither yet the deadness of Sarah's womb : he staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief; but 21 was strong in faith, giving glory to God; and being fully persuaded, that what he had promised, he was able also to 22 perform. And therefore it was imputed to him for right- eousness. 23 Now, it was not written for his sake alone, that it was im- 24 puted to him : but for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, of his advanced age. Though the tliought of this entered Abraham's mind, Gen. 17 : 17, yet he allowed it no influence in opposition to God's promise. 20. He stagcjered not, etc. ; wavered not, did not indulge in doubts, but was strong in his confidence that God's promise would be fulfilled. II Giving glory to God : honoring God, as One that could not but prove faith- ful to his word. — A full belief of God's promises admits his real char- acter and gives him the honor which is his due. 22. And therefore it was imputed, etc. His faith in God, that is, his beheving, so readily and fully, the declaration of God, was put to his account as righteousness. His faith was peculiarly strong ; it paid special honor to God, as the Being who would not fail to accomplish his word, how- ever unlikely its fulfilment might seem. By dius fully believing in him, though all circumstances were unfavorable to the fulfilment of the promise, Abraham acknowledged and honored the trae nature and character of God ; and because he thus simply and heartily relied on God, when, to all human appearance, he had no rational ground for hope, his faith was regarded as nghteousness, and by virtue of it he had favor with God. — The apostle had in mind the remarkable strength of Abraham's faith, as well as its genuineness ; and as this strong faith, resting simply and without wavering on the veracity of God while, according to the course of nature, the promised event was hopeless, paid honor to God as the almighty fulfillcr of his word, it was peculiarly acceptable to him and was put to Abraham's account as right- eousness, without any external works of legal obedience. 23-25. The case of Abraham is noAV applied to that of believers in Jesus. 23. Now it teas not written, etc. The fact, that Abraham's faith was put to his account as righteousness, was not recorded, Gen. 15:6, for his own sake merely ; not merely that an honorable and enduring testimony might be borne to him. 24. But for us also ; it was recorded for our sake also, in order to show us the principle on Avhich we too may be justified. Though the object of Abra- ham's faith, in the instance produced by the apostle, was not the same as that of the Christian's faith, yet the nature of faith, and its moral quality, in the two cases are the same. It is a confiding in God, in his declara- tions and his aiTangeraents, and is indicative of right feelings and pur- poses towards him : as directed to Christ, it is a tnisting in him as our Eedeemer and Lord, and a virtual uniting of ourselves to him for a per- sonal participation in the spiritual and eternal blessings which can come to us only through him. || To whom it shall be imputed: to whom faith, similar to Abraham's, shall be reck- oned as righteousness for our justifi- cation. II If we believe on him, etc. Abraham had faith in God respecting 50 ROMANS. if we believe on liim that raised up Jesus our Lord from the 25 dead, who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification. a case which was like making alive the dead ; so we are to have faith in God as having raised up Jesus from the dead. It is in God, as having raised up Jesus, that we are here said to believe, because the resurrection of Jesus was the great fact which proved him to be the Son of God, 1:4. Luke 18 : 33. Acts 2 : 29—32, and confirmed the acceptableness to God of his life and death, John 10 : 17 ; his resurrection was necessary, also, to the consummation of his media- torial work in heaven. — To believe in God, thus viewed, is the same as to believe in Christ ; the one involves the other. The mode of speaking, here adopted, originated from the apostle's mention of Abraham's believing in God, and from his desire to preserve similarity in tlie cases of Abraham and of believers in Christ. Compare, for this mode of expression, 1 Pet. 1 : 21. 25. Who was delivered ; delivered up to death. || For our offences; on account of our transgressions; as a sin-offering, a propitiatory sacrifice. 3 : 25. II Raised again ; from the dead. || For our justification ; on account of our justification ; so that we miglit be justified. — The death and resurrection of Christ, and, we might add, liis ascension to heaven, are parts of a great transaction, hav- ing for its object our justification and salvation. The apostle looks separ- ately at the death and the resun-ection of Christ, and at their propitiatory and justifying efficacy, rather for the sake of completeness and vivid im- pression than for the purpose of mak- ing minute doctrinal distinctions. In other passages, the death of Christ is represented as the ground of justifi- cation through faith in him, 3 : 25. 5 : 6, 8, 10 ; but then it is a death which was followed by a resurrection : the resurrection of Christ is sometimes regarded witli prominence, as con- nected Avith our enjoyment of the divine favor, 1 Pet. 3 : 21 ; but then it is the resurrection, as preceded by a peculiar death. — We are here viewed in a twofold state ; first, as sinners under condemnation, and next, as justified. The former view connects itself with the sorrowful scene of the Saviour's death on ac- count of our sins ; the latter con- nects itself rather with the Saviour's triumph over death, as having com- pleted his propitiatory work and delivered his followers from the just desert of their sins, securing their jus- tification and acceptance with God. — As our justification results from be- lieving in Christ, and we should not have adequate reason for believing in him, had he not risen from the dead agreeably to his prediction, there is a special appropi-iateness in connecting our justification with his resurrection, the signal event which proved that his death was not that of a common man, but of the Son of God, and that it was accepted of God as the ground of human salvation. Additional Note on the expres- sion. Faith was counted for righteous- ness, or imputed, or reckoned for right- eousness. — These three words, as has been already stated under verse 6, represent one and the same word in the original. This expression does not mean that faith is put to a per- son's account instead of righteousness in any such sense as to imply that a justified person may be still an un- righteous man ; but tliat faith is put to his account as righteousness, so as to be regarded by God in the light of a rigliteousncss : that is, faith towards God, or Christ, in other words, the belixiving temper of mind wliich con- fides in God's declarations, is gra- ciously accepted by him as righteous- ness, through which its possessor, though sin might justly bo put to his CHAPTER y. Consequeni^es of justification by faith, 1-11. Parallel and contrast between Adam and Christ, 12-19. Purpose for which the Mosaic law was introduced, 20, 21. 1 Therefore being justified by faith, vre have peace with 2 God through our Lord Jesus Christ : by whom also we have access by faith into this grace wherein we stand, and rejoice in 3 hope of the glory of God. And not only so, but we glory in account, is justified in the sight of God. This believinj^, or confiding, temper is also an obedient temper; but the obedience has its root in faitli towards God, not in an originally rigliteous spirit. The reckoning of righteousness to a believer, then, is not a mere show. The difference, however, is easily perceived between a law-righteousness, consisting in a personal obedience to the divine law, which obedience would be a ground of justitication in the sight of God ; and afaith-rifjtheoiisness, consisting in a cordial trust in God, or Christ, which tiiist, being a bond of union to Christ, is, by the grace of God, ac- cepted as available to the person's justification, while, if judged on strictly legal grounds, he would be condemned. CHAPTER V. The apostle has now completed his reasoning on the question of jus- tification in the sight of God ; and proceeds to touch on the blissful re- sults of justification to believers, or the happy condition into which they are brought as to their relation to God, as to their hopes and their pres- ent joys. He instances, as these results, peace ^^^th God, hope of future gloiy, exultation even in trou- bles, exultation in reference to God. Vs. 1-11. Resemblances and contrasts be- tween Adam and Christ are then presented. Vs. 12-19. A reason is next given for the introduction of the Mosaic law. 20, 21. 1 . Bei)ig justified by faith ; being treated as righteous, being accepted of God, through faith in Christ. II Peace ivith God; a peaceful mind towards God, in contrast with the dread formerly felt in view of his jus- tice and deserved wrath. 2. Access — into this (/race; admis- sion into this state of favor, or gra- tuitous blessing, namely, justification in the sight of God and reconciliation with him. || Wherein ice stand; in which we stand fast. — The careful- ness of the apostle in keeping Christ before tlie minds of his readers, as the author of this justification, and faith in him, as the medium of its attainment, is very noticeable : both are mentioned in the first verse and both again in the second. — 1| Rejoice; exult. The word in the original ex- presses such feelings as are often con- veyed by the term boast of, employed in a commendable manner. || The glonj of God ; the glory of heaven which belongs to God and to which he vdW admit the disciples of Christ. 3. Not only so, but we glory in tribulations cdso ; not only do we exult in the hope of lieavenly glory, but in troubles also. Not dismayed by our troubles, we even make our boast of them. The idea of the sacred writer is not exhausted by the thought that we exult in the midst of troubles, or afflictions : but the troubles them- selves he seems to regard as a ground of exultation. — The reasons of this sentiment are next given. || Tribu- lation icorkcth patience; trouble con- duces to patient endurance, steculfast- ness. In trials, the believing heart remains constant, docs not admit tlie (51) 52 ROMANS. tribulations also ; knowing that tribulation worketh patience ; 4 and patience, experience ; and experience, hope : and hope 5 maketh not ashamed ; because the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts, by the Holy Ghost which is given unto us. thought of abandoning the Saviour ; it adheres the more closely to him. Troubles, as being a part of the ap- pointed discipline, promote steadfast- ness. 4. Patience worketh experience. Ex- perience, here, means not the process of subjection to trials, but the result, namely, approved integrity, which the patient endurance of troubles works out. Patient endurance of afflictions, or steadfastness in tlie midst of them, results in tried integritij towards God. II Experience worketh hope; experi- ence of afflictions, issuing in the re- sult of confirmed Christian integrity, produces hope. — The hope, here in- tended, is an advanced stage of hope as mentioned in the second verse and amounts to strong confidence in the attainment of its objects. It is hope, sti-engthened and matured by trials. 5. Hope maketh not ashamed. The hope thus matured, Avarranted and en- couraged by confirmed Christian in- tegrity, does not disappoint its pos- sessor. It will not fail to be realized, and will not, through failure, make him ashamed of his confident expecta- tions : it will issue in the actual pos- session of the unutterable gloiy which it anticipates. — The ground of this persuasion is next presented. || Be- cause the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts, etc. ; because God loves us, and has given abundant expression to his love by the Holy Spirit bestowed on us. By the Holy Spirit he has imparted an assured and felt convic- tion of his love to us ; and has awak- ened within us a corresponding aflfec- tionate temper towards him, so that we feel that he has loved us. As the confiding child knows, and feels, that his pai-ent loves him, and this filial temper helps him rightly to estimate his parent's acts, as emanating from pareutal love, so the believer, under the copious influence of the Holy Spirit has such a temper of mind towards God as makes him feel that God has loved him. God has not kept his love to us pent up, as it were, in his own breast ; he has given copious and full expression to it : he has come to our hearts, and poured it forth abundantly on them, so that we feel he has loved us. An affec- tionate friend makes known his love by appropriate tokens and acts, and these produce, in the object of his regard, a sense of the love Avhich is thus expressed ; so God makes us sensible of his love to us. This is done by the agency of the Holy Spirit, whose access to our souls pro- duces not so much a conviction as a feeling, that God loves us, a sensibil- ity to God's love. — The reciprocal action of mind and heart must here be acknowledged ; but the superior action is that of the heart, cherishing affection towards God through the power of the Holy Spirit. — 1| By the Holy Ghost, etc. By the agency of the Holy Spirit, God's love to us becomes a matter of conviction and deep feeling. The Spirit renovates our hearts and imparts to us a filial temper, making us genuine disciples of Christ, so that God can consist- ently with his holy character abun- dantly express Ins love to us. This expression of God's love for us, as believers on his Son, is a sufficient assurance that the hope resting on Christ will never fail. — While, by the Holy Spuit, God makes manifesta- tions, in our hearts, of his love and acknowledges us as his children, the gift of the Spirit is itself a fruit of his love. The apostle's idea is substan- tially the same liere as in the passages where the Spirit is spoken of as the earliest of the promised inheritance, given before-hand to believers. See 2 CHAPTER V. 53 10 For ^Yllen we were yet without strength, in due time Christ died for the ungodly. For scarcely for a righteous man will one die ; yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. But God commendeth his love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners Christ died for us. Much more then, beino^ now justified by his blood, we shall be saved For if when we were enemies, we from wrath through him Cor. 5 : 5, God, who also hath given to us the earnest of the Spirit ; and Eph. 1 : 13, 14, Ye were sealed with that Holy Spirit of promise, or, the promised Holy Spirit, which is the earnest of our inheritance. It is the earnest, since it makes us holy and fits us for the heavenly inheritance, awak- ens filial feeliufcs towards God and draws us to an affectionate intercourse with him. 6. The love of God had been mentioned, v. 5, as the ground of confidence that the hope enjoyed bv believers would not be disappointed. The apostle now proceeds to the evi- dence of God's love, consisting in what he has done in our behalf. — When we were yet without strength ; while we were weak, unal)le to help ourselves ; while we were in sin and wretcliedness, and unable to rescue ourselves from condemnation. This state is, indeed, a guilty one ; but the precise point, Avhich the apostle has in mind, is the helplessness to which sin had reduced us, as to attaining deliverance and the divine favor. II In dm time ; at the api)ointed time, according to the divine an'angement of events : as the apostle says in Gal. 4 : 4, when the fuhiess of the time was come. II Christ died for the unrjodljj ; for the benefit, or in behalf, of the ungodly. Those who had just been spoken of as having no spiritual strength to extricate themselves from their wretched state, are here denom- inated un'jodlii ; as, in the 8th verse, they are in like manner called sin- ners. It is here assumed, as well known and remembered by readers, that Christ is the Son of God : and thus his dying for the ungodly attests God's love to men. 5* 7. That Christ's dying in behalf of men attests the greatness of God's love, is shown by contrast. Scarcely would any one die in behalf of even a just man, fallen into calamity : but Christ died for us sinners, meriting his displeasure. — Scarcely for a righteous man ; a just man, a man of integrity, acknowledged to have committed no offence. || Yet peradventure for a good man, etc. The apostle concedes the possibility, that one might offer his life in behalf of another ; in be- half of a generous, noble-hearted man, always ready to do a favor, and endearing himself to everybody by his kind and noble deeds, perhaps some one might offer to die. This admission, however, docs not dimin- ish the force of the contrast ; for such a case cannot exist in reference to Christ. Ko acts of aenerosity could have been done by men towards him, in requital for which he would offer himself to death. 8. So far from having secured regard by the bestowal of benefits, men were not even simply /».s?, they were not ivithout guilt, in the sight of God. They Avere positively sinners, justly condemned. God commendeth his love towards us ; shows forth, gives proof of, his deep love for us. 9. 3Iuch more then, etc. A strong inference from the preceding verse : If through the death of his Son, as the proof of his love for us, we are now justified, that is, treated as if righteous, much more shall we, as justified, be saved through his Son from final wrath. 10. For if ivhen we were enemies, etc. The same idea is more strongly presented. If, having been enemies to God, we have, through the death 54 ROMANS. were reconciled to God by the death of his Son ; much more, 1 1 being reconciled, we shall be saved hj his life. And not only so, but we also joy in God, through our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom we have now received the atonement. 12 Wherefore as by one man sin entered into the world, of his Son, become his friends, much more, noAv that we are his friends, we shall be completely saved throwjh his life, since he now ever liveth in heaven to act as our patron. Compare 8 : 34 ; the idea of which verse is, since Clirist has died for us, rather is risen, and is at the right hand of God, pleading our cause, no one can rise up to condemn us. See, also, Heb. 7 : 25, He is able to save to the ut- termost, that is, completely, them that come unto God through him, seeing he ever liveth to make intercession for them; also, 1 John 2: 1. That Christ should die for us, while we were sinners, is more surprising tlian that he Avill com])lcte our salvation by acting in our behalf on high, now that we have become justified and reconciled to God through his death. 11. Not only so, but ice also joy in God. Not only does the love of God warrant this confidence of future sal- vation, so that we can exult in the troubles which assail us, but we also exult in God, make our boast of him as bearing to us, through Cluist, most endearing relations. j| We have re- ceived the atonement ; that is, the recon- ciliation intimated in the preceding verse. The word atonement bore this signification, when our translation of the scriptures was made, and the original word is, as to its root, the same as is translated reconciled in the 10th verse. The result of our Lord's death, namely, reconciliation, is here meant ; not the means, or process, by which that result was reached. This reconciliation is a matter of present enjoyment; we have it 7ioiv. — Well may we exult, since God, the al- mighty and most merciful, is our fi-iend. For this state of reconcili- ation with God we are indebted to Christ. 12-19. The apostle had been un- folding the method of justification, and had just shown its happy results in those who avail themselves of its benefits by believing in Christ. The idea of reconciliation to God and its consequent bliss, was now particu- larly prominent in his mind : and the conception of the unliappy state of men, as sinners, and the glorious con- trast as to the state of Chi-ist's fol- lowers, seems to have suggested to him a parallel between Adam, the head of the human race, through whom sin, condemnation and wo en- tered into the world, and Christ, the head of believers, through whom come justification, recovery to lioli- ness, and bliss. The advantage is immensely on Christ's side of the parallel, and strikingly confirms the views given in the preceding part of the chapter. 12. WIterefore. This word relates to the preceding train of thought Avhich had established the great ti-uth, that justification and eternal life come to us through Jesus Chi-ist. This truth places Christ at the head of the justified and reconciled company, a position, con-esponding to that * of Adam as the head of the human race. || By one man ; Adam, as ap- pears from the following verses. II Sin entered into the ivorld ; into the wox'ld of mankind, the human family: mankind became sinful. || Death. This word has various significations, according to the connection in which it occurs. It is, at least mainly, in this paragraph, the contrast of spiritual and eternal life, tlie blessed state of favor with God, all spiritual good for time and eternity. See verses 17 and 21 ; compare Deut. 30: 15. Spiritual life consists in the confoiTnity of our hearts to the divine CHAPTER Y 55 an I death by sin ; and so death passed upon all men, for that, 13 all have sinned: (For until the law, sin was in the world ; will, and in our harmony with God as to affections, purposes and con- duct : its po-^scssion secures to us the exalted bliss, in time and eternity, winch cannot but flow from our stand- intr in ri;rht relations towards God. Death is the opposite of this ; it is tliat miserable condition in which a moral and accountable being stands, whose heai't is not right with God, who has no delight in his will and no v/ell-grounded peace of mind, who is filled witli dread in respect to God, and .who, when awakened to his spir- itual state, can anticipate only con- demnation. The death of the body does not fui-nish an adequate contrast to the life which is connected Avith being justified in the sight of God ; yet bodily death, as eminently a form of human misery, is included in the apostle's idea ; for, that he regarded the death of the body as a conse- quence of sin, and of our connection with Adam, is evident from 8:10 and from! Cor. 15: 22. Compare Gen. 3 : 19. — Death, as it now occurs to man, would not have been endured but on account of sin ; for though the Creator may never have designed that men should have an uninter- rupted existence on this earth, and in their present material bodies, yet the transition to a different sphere of being, and the laying aside of the animal body, might have been ef- fected in a way not suitable to be called death, but only a change unac- companied by pain or any disagree- able circumstances, a desirable and glorious change, like that which will t ike place on those avIio, instead of dying, will be changed at the resur- rection. 1 Thess. 4: 1.5-17. 1 Cor. 15 : 51, 52. The dissolution of soul and body, as it now takes place, must, however, be put to the account of sin ; and bodily death, as being the most dire evil to unholy men, and far from being void of terror even to the righteous, may well be included among the miserable results of sin. II Death passed upon all men. Tlie original is quite expressive, hath passed through unto all men. \\ For that all have sinned. Tlie reason is here given, why the wretched state of death, taken comprehensively, has extended to all. The apostle seems careful to prevent an abuse of his statement that, in consequence of one man's sin, all men are become subject to death : all, he says, are subject to the doom of sin, since all have sinned. 13, 14. For until the law sin teas in the loorld. The assertion that all had sinned and incuiTed the doom of sin, needed confirmation, particularly among Jews. The apostle had al- ready shown that Jews, as well as Gentiles, were sinners ; and now he finds it necessary to show that men were all sinners, previously to the introduction of the Mosaic law which drew the distinction so broadly be- tween Jews and other nations. In- stead, therefore, of presenting at once the contrasted thought concerning Christ, namely, that righteousness and eternal life come by Christ, he intcrrapts his course in order to sus- tain that assertion. He affirms that, as a matter of fact, sin was commit- ted previously to the introduction of the law, from the time of Adam doAvn to the time when the law was introduced ; though he concedes that, without so clear an announcement of the divine vnW as the law made, sin is not charged to men's account, that is, comparatively : notwithstanding, it was a fact, that sin was in the world and that men were subjected to its doom, from Adam to Moses, even before the law was given, and there- fore in the absence of a direct and full revelation of the divine will. — He here viewed sin as a violation of that law which is involved in our very being, as subjects of God : men dis- regarded the inalienable, though un- 56 ROMANS. 14 but sin is not imputed when there is no law ; nevertheless, death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is 15 the figure of him that was to come. But not as the offence, so also IS the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto written, claims of God as theu* Cre- ator and Euler. Tlie Mosaic law was not the beginning of divine legis- lation ; it was a more direct and sys- tematic declaration of moral princi- ples which lie necessarily in man's nature. || Sin is not imputed; sin is not put to a person's account. ^ Com- paratively speaking, the sins of men were not held to be so aggravated as to be put to their account with strict- ness, while a clear revelation of the divine will was not possessed ; in such circumstances, sin is not charged in all its fulness ; God makes mer- ciful allowances. Compare John 15 : 22. Acts 14: 16. 17 : 30. 14. Death reigned; death bore sway, as a domineering tyx-ant, sub- jecting men, soul and body, to its power. The misery consequent on ein, is here personified : sin comes, and death, the inflictor of all misery, follows in its train. || Them, that had not sinned after the similitude, etc.; those who had not sinned in circum- stances like Adam's : that is, against clearly expressed commands. The idea, in this clause, corresponds to the expression in the preceding verse, when there is no laiv. The assertion of the apostle is, that the sway of death was felt before the giving of the law, during the Avhole time from Adam to Moses : men were, there- fore, sinners ; they were subjected to miseiy, as being sinners, notwith- etanding the merciful allowances, which God makes in reference to those who have not the means of a clear knoAvledge of his will. All men were in a state of condemnation, and death had sway over them, as sinners, though the law had not yet been given. || Adam, who is the figure, etc. ; who is a countei-part, a resem- blance, of Christ, as to the relation in Avhich he stood. The resemblance, or correspondence, between Adam and Christ, consists in the fact, that both of them stood as heads of re- spective companies ; Adam the sin- ner, by means of Avhom sin and death pen-aded the human family ; Christ the righteous, by means of whom come righteousness and life. — The sentiment that Adam was a figure, or resemblance of Christ, contained a thought of great importance, as really suggesting the corresponding part of the comparison commenced in the 12th verse, but not there carried out, namely, that righteousness, and eter- nal life come by Christ. This part of the comparison having thus been really suggested, the apostle leaves it for the present and proceeds, in verses 15-17, to indicate contrasts between Adam and Christ, as to the results which have floAved from them respect- ively. These results are, immcasur- ablv, to the advantage of the grace of Christ. 15. The transgression and the free gift are here contrasted as to their results. — Jf through the offence of one many he dead, etc.; more literally. If through the offence of the one, that is, Adam, the many, tliat is, the mass of men, mankind, be dead. — On one side, the many were, through the offence of the one, in a state of death, for that they all sinned : on the other side, the grace, or favor, of God and the free gift of righteousness and life bestowed in consequence of that grace, through the one man Jesus Christ, far more abounded to the many, for that they CHAPTER V. 16 many. And not as it was bj one that sinned, so is the gift. For the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification. For if by one 17 man's offence, death reigned by one ; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteous- 18 ness, shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ). Therefore, as believed in Christ. The many, in the former case, are all who have sinned, as appears from the 12th verse; the many, in the latter case, are all who have believed, as appears from the doctrine established in the preceding chapters of the epistle and from the 1 7th verse of the present chapter. — Death is to all who sin ; the free gift of life is to all who believe in Christ. These conditions on which death and life, respectively, are adjudged, mnst not be overlooked ; since, if over- looked, neither the condemned state of men, nor the justified state of Christ's disciples, would be properly- estimated. — The point of contrast, here, is, the great abundance of divine favor by Jesus Christ, so far exceed- ing the doom incurred through the transgression of Adam. The inflic- tion of misery, on the part of God, is always kept within the limits of justice, so that no one is ever unjustly treated : the bestowal of happiness, however, does not require so strict a regai'd to measure, since God delights in the exuberance of his love to those who are prepared to enjoy it ; and he need not repress it, for his goodness can be indulged towards righteous beings without injustice, or harm, to any. — Tlie thought seems, also, in- volved here, that life is a gift pro- ceeding from divine favor, while death is a just desert of men's sins. 16, 17. The persons, Adam and Clirist, are next contrasted ; first, as to the judicial sentence and the free gift ; secondly, v. 17, as to the results, both in kind and in magnitude. — For the judgment was hi/ one to condemna- tion, etc. The judicial sentence, oc- casioned by Adam, and the gift, pro- cured by Clirist, are here contrasted. The sentence proceeded from one of- fence to condemnation; but the free gift, from many offences to justifi- cation. Adam's one transgression was a prolific source of condemnation, as it was followed by the fact that all have sinned, and come under con- demnation ; but, through Christ, many sins are followed by justifica- tion as a free gift to beUevers, not- withstanding the many sins. 17, The second point of contrast between the persons, Adam and Christ, is found in the natui'e and magnitude of the respective results produced by each. — If by one man's offence, death reigned by one, etc. If by the offence, or transgression, of the one, Adam, death reigned, through that one, over men, lorded it over them, inflicting all miseries on them, in body and soul ; on the other hand, by the one, Jesus Christ, shall men reign, become kings in the future gloiy, be exalted to a royal state in eternal life, exalted to spiritual glory and bliss ; those men, namely, who become partakers of the abundant divine favor and the free gift of right eousness, that is, righteousness by faith, so as to be justified in the sight of God, — The description here given of those who should be blessed with eternal life shows that, throughout this paragraph, the idea of believing in Christ, on the part of those who are justified, is to be understood. Death and life are here contrasted ; also, the reign of death over sinners and the gloi-ious reign of tliose who arc justified through the rigliteousness of faith ; so that, instead of being reigned over by death, they them- selves shall reign in life, shall be elevated to signal glory and bliss. As to degree, the contrast will emi- nently honor the grace of God, since 58 ROMANS. by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to con- demnation, even so by the righteousness of one the free gift 19 came upon all men unto justification of life. For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obe- dience of one shall many be made righteous. the abundance of glory and bliss, enjoyed by those who receive the gift of rigJiteousness, will so entirely out- weigh the misery consequent on sin. 18. Having shown contrasts be- tween Adam and Christ, who resem- ble one another in regard to being at the head of their respective compa- nies, the apostle returns to the com- parison which was partially stated in the 12th verse, but was there inter- mpted. This comparison is, how- ever, rendered more complete and impressive by the connection in Avhich it is here resumed. — By the offence of one ; more con-ectly rendered, hi/ one offence, the first sin of Adam. This was the commencement of human transgressions, the first in a long se- ries : it issued in the condemnation of all, since all have followed in transgi-ession. See verse 12. || So by the righteousness of one; more cor- rectly, hy one righteous act. Special reference is here had to the crown- ing act of Christ's righteousness, namely, the laying down of his life. Compare John 10 : 17. This view of the passage is in harmony with the prominence given, throughout this epistle, to the death of Christ. || The free gift. These words are supplied by the translators, as also the word judgment, from the 16th verse. The subject was so completely and vividly before the apostle's mind, and the idea had, already, been so clearly ex- pressed, that he naturally leaves the reader to supply these terms. The result of the transgression, on the one hand, is contemplated, and of the righteousness, or righteous deed, on the other, in respect to the con- trasted companies. || Came upon all men. As the extent of the judgment is regulated hj the fact that all have sinmd, so the extent of the free gift is regulated by the fact tliat all who receive it have believed in Christ . the word all is applicable in each case, since the entire company, in each case, is contemplated by the apostle. || Unto justification of life ; justification which secured eternal life. Tins was the ultimate result in regard to the entire company of believers in Christ. 19. The reason is now given for the ultimate result in the two cases respectively, mentioned in the preced- ing verse ; condemnation, leading to death, justification, leading to hfe. This reason is, that in the one case the many had become sinners, in the other, tlie many had become right- eous. By one man's disobedience, etc.; througli the disobedience {v. 8, the offence), specially the first act of dis- obedience, of the one man, Adam, the many (such is a literal expression of the original), that is, the multitude of whom he was the head, became sinners. || So by the obedience of one shall many, etc. The obedience here mentioned is, in accordance witli the righteousness, or righteous act, men- tioned in verse 18, the special and crowning act of obedience on the pait of Christ ; namely, his giving him- self up to death, thus fonning a corre spondence and contrast to the first act of disobedience on the part of Adam. Compare Phil. 2 : 8, where death is mentioned as tlie extent to wliich the obedience of Christ was carried.— Tlu'ough the obedience of the one, namely Christ, particularly in submit- ting to the death of the cross, shall the many, the multitude of whom he is the Head, become righteous. II TFcre made sinners. According to the original verb here used, the clause may be properly rendered, were con- stituted, came into the standing, or coji- dition, of sinners ; that is, became sin- CHAPTER V. 59 ners. \\ Shall he made righteous; shall he consfitnted, come into the standing, or condition, of righteous ones ; that is, shall become righteous in the siglit of God, through faith in Christ. — The precise nature of men's moral con- nection with Adam, or the way in which all become sinners through his transgression, the apostle does not explain : he asserts the fact, and that, for the purpose of illustrating the mercy of God in the rcdemi)tion of believers in Christ. The question belongs to the domain of speculative religious philosophy and will always be variously answered. Wliatever account is to be given of human sin- fulness, as to its origination, two things are certain : first. As soon as human beings reflect on their moral state, they find themselves sinners and under condemnation : second. Every enlightened mind passes con- demnation on itself, as personally guilty for every one of its sinful affections, purposes and acts. The genuine religious philosopher cannot be contented with a theory which overlooks either of these facts. Is the justification spoken of by the apostle actual, or only possible, jus- tification ? justification itself, or a provision for it ? In reply, it must be considered, that the language will not admit of any other meaning than that of actual justification. The terms are such as occur in other places where the meaning is not liable to such a question. Again ; the con- demnation which is the opposite £>f it is a real condemnation : so too tlien, is the justification. The difticulty which prompts tliis inquiry can be more satisfactorily ob- viated than by resorting to the sup- position, that merely a provision for justification is here spoken of. The difficulty is, that justification seems here made co-extensive with condem- nation, and consequently seems to include all men. Now Ave must not forget, that through all the preceding part of the epistle the writer has been exhibiting the medium of justifica- tion, namely, faith in Jesus Clmst : without this, he teaches, the hope of justification is not to be cherished. This is clearly his doctrine, and it must be regarded as running through this paragraph, though not here for- mally mentioned. Compare the 17th verse. Let this paragraph be ex- plained in conformity with tlie apos- tle's principles, so largely manifested and so elaborately and carefully A\TOught out in the preceding chap- ters, and difficulty vanishes. — This is also obvious from the need of there being, in reference to those who are justified, a thought corresponding to that, distinctly stated, in reference to those who are condcnrned ; namely, for that all have sinmd. Now, keep- ing in view the two companies, that is, the condemned and the justified under the two corresponding heads, Adam and Christ, we may employ in reference to the justified the corre- sponding formula, fur that theg have all believed; a formula not capable indeed, from the facts in the case, of application to men universally ; but strictly applicable to all who are jus- tified. Thus all the parts of this paragraph are in harmony with one another ; and the paragraph is, in- deed, a virtual, though extended and amplified, re-statement of the apos- tle's leading doctrine. — The work of Christ in reference to the human race is, indeed, such that all hindrances to God's reconciliation with men, and their acceptance Avith him, are re- moved, except only those which are in men's own breasts ; so that God may be said to occupy the attitude of reconciliation to men, 2 Cor. 5 : 19. John 3: 16, 17. 1 John 2:2; and he stands ready to accept them as justified in his sig'ht. Justification for the human family is procured, so far as the relation of God to them is concerned ; and it is only requisite now that men, having a sense of their guilt and their need of redemp- tion, should by faith in Christ, as the Redeemer, appropriate to themsclvo > 60 ROMANS. 20 Moreover, the law entered that the off"ence might abound. 21 But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound : that as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness uneo eternal life, by Jesus Christ our Lord. this justification. The apostle, how- ever, is evidently speaking, in this paragraph, of those who, by believing in Christ, have actually become par- takei-s of justification, and, through discipleship to him, are becoming prepared for eternal life. 20. The apostle now returns to the thought suggested in the 13th verse, that sin is not reckoned to men's account in the absence of the law. This thouglit might appear to some to furnish a reason for the per- petual withholding of the law ; for, if, while the law was withholden, sin was not charged, why would it not have been better to decline giving the law, and thus prevent the accumula- tion of sins ■? Why the law was in- troduced, then, was an important inquiry. This inquiry the apostle answers. It might have been, in part, appropriate to say, that the withholding of the law would not have so far prevented the commission of sin as also to prevent the reign of death, and secure eternal life to man- kind. Men Avere sinners and would have perished, even if the law had not been introduced. No advantage, then, would have been gained by withholding the law, Avhile yet an in- dispensable step to the felt necessity for a mei'ciful redemption would not have been taken. Tlie law must be introduced as a necessary historical step in the development of human character and wants, and as the means of awakening and deepening men's consciousness of being under sin, and of the helplessness and miseiy to which it subjects its victims, and thus as preliminary and preparatory to the scheme of redemption. — The law ; the Mosaic law viewed in all its parts, though specially its moral prin- ciples. The apostle is still to be con- ceived of as reasoning with Jews ; while yet his argument connects it- self with all men, since the moral principles of the Jewish code are but a clearer and fuller exhibition of the duties of all men, as grounded in their relation to God and their ac- countableness to him, and as ackr.owl- edgcd in the moral consciousness of all men. || That the offence might abound; that transgressions might abound in number and aggravation. This was not the ultimate purpose of the law, but an intermediate and subordinate one for awakening a more vivid and distressing conscious- ness of personal guilt and of the need of redemption, and an appre- ciating sense of God's grace in pro- viding the plan of salvation. — The agency of the law when distinctly applied to the souls of men in calling forth to activity their latent si'.iful- ness, producing greater guilt and a deeper sense of the need of redemp- tion, finds an illustration in the agency of some medical prescriptions which put the elements of disease into activity and would seem for a time to be only aggravating the dis- order, while the intention and the re- sult of the application may be to eradicate and remove the elements of disease. || Grace did much more abound. The loving kindness of God proved itself surpassingly great, how- ever great became the sinfulness and ill desert of men. 21. Here appears the ultimate purpose of the introduction of the law ; namely, that the reigning power of sin might be overcome, evidently and completely, by the immensely superior power of divine grace in se- curing righteousness and eternal life for men. — Tliat as sin hath reigned unto death, so, etc.; that as sin has exerted CHAPTER VI. Believers in Christ -will not live in sin, since they are in union vrith him in respect to hia death and his resurrection, and are not under the law, but under grace, 1-li. The grace of God by which believers are justified is incompatible with their living in sin, since those who live in sin are servants of sin, not servants of God, 15-22. The ser- vice of sin -will be followed by its deserved recompense ; while to those who are in Christ God gives eternal life, 23. a kingly, despotic sway by reducing men to death, so, and in outweighing contrast, the grace of God should bear sway, displa}dng a kingly, su- preme power in believers, through righteousness, issuing in eternal life. This righteousness and eternal life are by Jesus Christ : it is, conse- quently, the righteousness by foith in Christ, which thus magnifies the grace of God. It is the thought o^ justifi- cation, that is present to the apostle's mind ; hence it is the fixitk-righteous- ness, that is here intended. — The mention of Jesus Christ as our Lord shows that, throughout tliis part of the chapter, believers in Christ are had in view, and not 7nen universally, so far as justification is the topic of discourse. We should do violence to the apostle's language, were we to omit this thought, so perpetually and sti'ongly stated in the preceding part of the reasoning. Faith in him is there re]n-esented as the cardinal principle of our justification ; and this is necessar}', in order that we may belong to his company and have liim really as our Lord. The repetition of this in the summary view, which this chapter presents, was no more necessary, in the apos- tle's judgment, in order that he might not be misunderstood, than was the repeated statement, that men's own sins are the pi-ocuring cause of their condemnation, after having distinctly stated this in the 1 2th verse. CHAPTERS VI — Vin. In 5 : 20, the apostle had expressed the sentiment, that the abounding of transgression was to prove the occa- 6 sion of the abounding of divine grace in forgiving sin and rescuing men from its fatal sway. The thought might naturally arise in some minds that, according to this sentiment, liberty might be taken to indulge in sin in order to give opportunity for the display of divine grace in forgiv- ing it and preventing its legitimate consequences. The apostle, there- fore, takes up this thought and ex- poses its absurdity; and from this point proceeds to dilate on tlie sanc- tifying power of the gospel, showing that the faith in Chnst wliich avails for justification also promotes holi- ness of heart and life, inspires the believer Avith filial love to God, im- parts spiritual strength, and thus secures obedience to God. — He was thus led to a consideration of the gos- pel, as designed and adapted to se- cure holiness in beUevers, as well as their justification in the sight of God. This part of the epistle occupies the sixth, seventh, and eighth chapters. CHAPTER VL The question now under consider- ation is. Whether believers, towards whom divine grace has abounded in their justification, may continue in sin, in order to give occasion for a more ample display of that grace. The question divides itself into two parts : in the first place. May believ- ers continue in sin ? In reply to this, the apostle states it as a well known and acknowledged sentiment, that believers in Ciirist are united with him in respect to his death for sin and in respect to his resurrection to a glorious life. Since, now, they are (61) 62 ROMANS. 1 What shall we say then ? Shall we continue in sin, that 2 grace may abound ? God forbid : how shall we, that are dead 3 to sin, live any longer therein ? Know ye not that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ, were baptized into dead in respect to sin, having fellow- ship -with Christ in his death for sin, its sway over them is to cease, just as Christ, having once died for sin, is henceforth no more held liable to death, and they are henceforth to live in righteousness to the glory of God, as those who, in conformity to the resurrection of their Lord, and in fel- lowship with him as risen to a glorious life, have become spiritually alive through Jesus Christ. Since faith in Christ has reference to his death and his resurrection, that faith necessainly involves a renunciation of sin and an entering on a new life, a life of righteousness. Vs. 1-14. Having disposed of the first part of tlie query, he proceeds to the second, which is presented in a some- what modified form ; namely. Wheth- er the believer's being on the foot- ing of grace, not of law, alloyvs of his committing sin. To tins a nega- tive answer is given, on the ground that the obedience we render, whether to sin or to righteousness, shows whom we serve as our master, and consequently that those wlio live in sin are its servants, and not servants of God, as believers have aA^owed themselves to be. Believers, then, being servants of God, should suiTcn- der to him all tlieir powers : God will bestow on them the gift of eternal life ; while those who serve sin will receive the Avages of sin. Vs. 15- 23. 1. SJiall ice continue in sin that (pace maij abound ? Shall we still live in sin, on the groimd that thereby we may give an opportunity for the grace of God to be more abundantly exercised and honored ? 2. God forbid. See 3: 4. The apostle strongly protests against tlie thought presented in the preceding verse. || How shall we, etc. With- out affirming the obvious insincerity of a person who should make such a proposal, and without insisting that continuance in sin could not arise from a respect and love for God and from a desire to glorify his grace, but must be traced to a preference of sin and a supreme regard to one's own selfish gratification, the apostle con- fines himself to the question. Whether a believer in view of his character and profession of union with Christ can continue in sin ? This question finds a prompt reply in the thought, that believers in Christ are dead to sin ; that is, to its dominion and to the gratifications which it may prom- ise. Continuance in sin would be utterly inconsistent with death to sin | and liife to God ; to such a death, and / such a life, believers have pledged' themselves. 1| Dead to sin : dead to its power, so that it does not control us ; dead to its attractions, so tliat Ave are not draAvn tOAvards it; dead to any claim Avhich it might assert to our regard. 1| How shall we ... . live any longer therein ? Death and life in respect to the same tiling, do not co- exist : it Avould be absurd for a per- son Avho has renounced the claims of sin still to subject himself to those claims ; absurd for a per>:on whose affections have been AvitlidraAvn from sin, still to indulge in sinful desires and be governed by sinful principles. If Ave live in sin, Ave are not dead in respect to it : now, genuine believers are dead to sin and alive to righteous- ness, and consequently cannot liA'e in sin. Sin is at A^ariance Avitli their in- most principles. 3. K7WW ye not, etc. The spiritual import of baptism Avas Avell knoAvn. By it a person professed to belong to Christ, avoAving a participation in the death of Christ, a fellowship AA'ith him in respect to death, and an oh- CHAPTER VI. 63 his death ? Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death : that like as Christ was raised up from the dead ligation to be conformed to him in respect to his death ; so that as he died, his follower has also become dead. As Christ died on account of sin, his followers, in avowing their union with him and pledging them- selves to him, avow particularly their sharing with him in his death, having become dead to sin by virtue of their union with him, he being their Lord and they his people, he the Head and they his members. || Baptized into Jesus Christ. This phrase is indi- cative of baptism as a profession of discipleship to Christ ; baptism con- tains aji avowal of our belonging to him as our Master, of our union with him as our Head : it is an acknowl- edgment of our obhgation to. obey him. — In the apostolic age, baptism was restricted to professed believers, and was the public act by which they bound themselves to the obserA'ance of his religion ; it was their public avowal of being disciples of Christ, and of belonging to his people. A Vsimilar expression occurs in 1 Cor. 10:2, where the Israelites are spoken of, figuratively, as having been bap- tized unto [in the original, into] Moses; that is, as having avowed themselves the people of Moses, those who had submitted themselves to his guidance and acknowledged him as their leader. II Were baptized into his death ; into an avowed participation of his death. Compare verse 8. As Christ died, so his followers have died ; He, on ac- count of sin, they, to sin, renouncing its claims and dominion, declaring and pledging themselves to be no longer in subjection to it : as he died in refei-ence to sin, so they avow themselves dead in reference to sin : they have fellowship with Christ in his death for sin. Not that baptism introduces a person into a participa- tion of death with Christ, in such a sense that it precedes the spiritual participation, or is essential to it; but baptism is the avowal of it, and by tliis emblematic act the followers of Christ pledged themselves to such a death, and expressed their union with Christ in respect to his death. — Com- pare the similar phrase in Matt. 3 : 11, fo be baptized unto [more properly, into] repentance,hj which, phrase bap- tism is indicated as an avowal of re- pentance, and as a pledge of entering on a penitent and righteous life. — I^ now, we have been baptized into the death of Christ, this avowal of disci- pleship to him, as having died for sin, and of our having undergone a corresponding death, namely, death to sin, the moral state itself, In which we have avowed ourselves to be is utterly inconsistent with our living in sin, since, if we live in sin, we are not dead to it. 4. Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death. By our bap- tism into Christ's death, and our thus avowing a parlicijjation of death with him, a fellowsliip with him in death, and an obligation to die with him in respect to sin, ice are buried ivith him, we partake also of his burial, we have fellowship with him also in burial. The idea of d(ath is here extended, so as to make it complete and lo pre- pare the way for introducing the idea of a resurrection. Burial follows death, and is the last full and definite expression of death and of the ending of a person's connection with this world. This thought it was requisite for the apostle to present, in order to extend the analogy betAvcen Christ and the believer, so as to include the idea of a resuneclion. As Christ has died, been buried, and has arisen from the dead to a glorious life, the believer, in like manner, having par- ticipated with Christ in death and burial, as is emblematically shoAvn in baptism, has fellowship also with him in his resurrection, and rises from the death of trespasses and sins to a new life of righteousness. || By the glory of the Father. Perhaps our 64 ROMANS. by the gloiy of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life. For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection : knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that hence- word majesty expresses the meaning of the word glonj as here employed : and in the majesty of God, power, so strikingly manifested in the resurrec- tion of Christ, is a distinguished ele- ment. In the resurrection of Christ from the dead, more than power, how- ever, was displayed by the Father : wisdom, mercy, faithfulness, indeed all the divine perfections, were con- nected with that event ; but the power of God first strikes the mind as producing it. Compare 1 Cor. 6 : 14. II Even so we also should walk in newness of life ; should lead a new life ; an obedient, righteous life, in contrast with our life before we subjected our- selves to Christ ; the new life differ- ing from the old, somewhat as the present glorious life of Christ in heaven differs from his past life of humiliation and suffering on earth. — .This participation with Christ, in death, burial and resurrection, would naturally associate itself in the minds of the earliest Christians with their baptism, because, in their day, bap- tism was, according to the literal meaning of the term, an immersion of the person. It was no empty ceremony ; but a highly instructive and impressive transaction. Com- (.pare Col. 2 : 12. 5. For if etc. In this verse the apostle presents the ground of the view given in the preceding verse, as to believers' leading a new life : this participation with Christ in a life suc- ceeding the death to sin, or their fel- lowship with Christ as risen, no less than as dead and buried, results from the truth that believers are kindred with him as to their affections and purposes, have a similar moral nature, having become most intimately united to him, so that what he underwent, and what he afterwards enjoyed, finds a correspondence in them and may be naturally expected from them. II We have been planted together in the likeness, etc. A different rendering of the word here translated planted together would more directly express the apostle's thought : it is not, strictly, the idea of planting that was present to his mind, but thatofA:?'n- drfdship in nature existing between Christ and his disciples, manifesting itself in respect to death and to resur- i-ection, in regard to both of which there is likeness to Christ on the part of his followers. It is, then, similar- ity in moral nature that is here con- templated, as of persons growing up together with feelings and purposes harmonious. The apostle may be considered as saying, If we have been conjoined with Christ in respect to death, so as to bear a likeness to him, and thus are kindred with him as to death, this will not be tlie end of the kindredship and resemblance ; but we shall also be kindred with him in bearing a resemblance to his resuiTCC- tion : as he arose, so we shall ai*ise ; as he arose from the dead to enter on the life in heaven, so we shall arise from the death of sin to enter on the new life of holiness. 6. Knowing this, etc. The same idea, substantially, is here repeated in another form, as a sentiment of which no one, at all instructed in Christianity, could be ignorant. — II That our old man is crucified with him ; our fonner temper of mind, the sinful disposition winch we formex'ly indulged, our former self, is crucified with Christ, has participiited with Christ in crucifixion, and undergone a death as he did : we have feUow- sliip Avith Christ in his crucifixion. The propensity to sin is here personi- fied and regarded as an internal agent CHAPTER Yl 65 7 forth we should not serve sin. For he that is dead is freed \ influencing our pui-poscs and conduct, and subjecting the entire man, soul and body, to itself. Tliis sinful dis- position has, in believers, been made to participate with Christ in cruci- fixion : as Christ was crucified, so our sinful nature, our former sinful self, has, in company with him, been crucified, that its power might be broken, and that it might no longer subject our minds and bodies to its control. — Or, as Christ was crucified, so our coiTupt inclination is crucified, is put to death, tliat we might no longer be held under its sway. — How interesting and impressive it is, to regard the Christian as, in respect to his former sinful inclination, under- going a death ; a crucifixion, in com- pany with his Lord ! This associat- ing of himself with his Lord awakens tender sensibilities, and adds strength to resolution. The Avarmth of grati- tude and love to Christ unites with a sense of duty, and the believer feels himself cheerfully constrained to give no allowance to sin. || That the body of sin might be destroyed. The design contemplated in this crucifixion of our foi-mer selves is, that we should no longer render Service to sin in the use of our bodily powers ; that the power which sinful propensities, orig- inating some of them in the bodily nature and emplojang the body as the means of their gratification, should be broken and made void, and the soul, under the power of a new life, be devoted to God in its use of the body. — The body of sin ; that is, the body, which has been a minister of sin, obeying its mandates ; the body, which has been a source of tempta- tion to sin, which has been the seat of many sinful gratifications, and the members of Avhicli have been the in- struments of sin. Si7iful body would be a suitable expression and in har- mony with the idiom of the original, provided we carefully guard against the idea that sin is inherent in the body, instead of being a quality of 6* the soul. The body is a sinful body, not as being in itself sinful, for it "is not by itself a moral agent ; and if the soul with which it is connected, Avere completely holy, the body Avould, as in the case of oiir Lord, ha a fit instrument for performing the soul's righteous desires and purposes : but it is sinful, as being the associate and instniment of a sinful soul, and as being the seat of many desires which a sinful soul penerts. — Might be de- stroyed ; more strictly in accordance with the original, might be made void, might be divested of its power and lose its sway. || That hencefoiih we should not serve sin. The result is here stated, which is to be expected from the fact that the former dispo- sition, or propensity, has been cruci- fied, and that the bodily nature, formerly abused and brought under the sway of sin, has been deprived of its power to control and gratify ; namely, that we should no longer serve sin, or be in subjection to it. Compare Col. 3 : 1-3, 9, 10. 7. For he that is dead is freed from sin. The ground of the sentirnent, advanced in verse 6, is here stated ; namely, whoever is dead in reference to an authority that has been exer- cised over him, is no longer held bound by that authority, but is re- leased from its sway. Compare 7 : 1,2. In conformity with this ground, he that is dead, that is, in the sense of Avhich the apostle is speaking, dead to sin, having undergone a death in respect to it, is al)Solvcd from the sway of sin : sin, regarded as a master, can no longer hold him as its servant, or subject, to follow its bidding. Freed from sin ; released, or absolved from its dominion. The expression in the original does not relate directly to moral purity, or personal holiness, butjs a legal "term, x-egarding sin, by personificatToirp'HSTr- master having held control and «is- " serted dominion over a person, as its slave ; that dominion has ceased. 66 ROMANS. 8 from sin. Now, if we be dead with Christ, we believe that 9 we shall also live with hira : knowing that Christ, being raised from the dead, dieth no more ; death hath no more 10 dominion over him. For in that he died, he died unto sin 11 once ; but in that he liveth, he liveth unto God. Likewise reckon ye also yourselves to be dead indeed unto sin, but Sin is no lon2:er his master ; he is dead to its service. He that is dead in respect to sin, havino- participated with Christ in a crucifixion which had reference to sin, is no longer held as a hond slave to sin, but is absoh'ed from its lordship. 8. Now, if, etc. Thus far the apos- tle has ttiken a negative view, regard- ing the disciple of Christ as dead to sin, and not held by its sway. He now passes to the positive view. The disciple participates Avith Christ in the fact of having a new life : he has fellowship with Christ in respect to life as well as to death. We have died with Christ ; we resemble him, and participate with hira, in regard to death ; we shall, also, live with him ; we shall resemble him, and participate ■with him, in regard to life. || We believe. The belief that we, who have become dead to shi, and are in this respect conjoined with Christ, shall also be conjoined with him in respect to life, and shall lead a new life, a life of righteousness, is grounded on the fact that Christians have a spirit- ual union with Christ, and conse- quently that between him and them there is harmony in the chief points of character and"^ condition. Thus in respect to life as well as death, genu- ine Cliristians will exemplify a fel- lowship witli him. 9. Knowintj that Christ being raised, etc. Christ, having been raised from the dead, is no more liable to death : henceforth, death has no power over him, and he will liave no occasion to subject liimself again to its power. His disciples arc united to him, as their Head ; and as they participated in a death conesponding to his, have had fellowship with him in his death, they will-participate with him in freedom from death, being delivered from the death of trespasses and sins ; they will participate with him, also, in a life corresponding to his, a spmt- ual life, a life of righteousness ; they will have fellowship with him also in his life. 10. For in that he died, he died unto sin once, etc. That Christ is now forever free from deatli, having once submitted to it and having been raised from the dead, follows from the fact that the design which he came to accomplish was ansAvered by dying once ; but the hfe to whicJi he arose, having reference to God and the ad- vancement of God's dominion, must, from tlie nature of the case, be an ever-during life. To overthrow sin, to destroy its dominion, could be secured by his once for all dying and thus stripping sin of its power. His relation to sin was but temporary, and a once for all dying secured his object ; but his relation to God is an ever-during one, and requires con- tinued, endless, life : his state, hence- forth, therefore, is to be a state of life. 11. Likewise reckon ye also your- selves to be dead, etc. Since then Christ has died on account of sin, and is henceforth free from liability to death, leading a glorious life with reference to the consummation of God's purposes, the followers of Christ ought to regard tliemselves as, in like manner, dead to sin, ac- knowledging its sway no longer, and as alive to the claims of God and the advancement of his honor. || Through Jesus Christ, etc. ; by virtue of spirit- ual union with him, or of being in him. If we are united to Christ and belong to him, we should be like him, as to the death he underwent, so far as the design of it is concerned ; we CHAPTER VI. 67 12 alive iinto God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, that ye should obey it 13 in the lusts thereof. Neither yield ye your members as in- struments of unrighteousness unto sin : but yield yourselves unto God, as those that are alive from the dead, and your 14 members as instruments of righteousness unto God : for sin shall not have dominion over you ; for ye are not under the law, but under grace. should also be like him, as to the life he is now leading, so far as re- spects its desic/n of canying forward the divine purpose of redemption. 12-14. An exhortation now fol- lows, grounded on the view of Chris- tians as being spiritually alive, alive to the claims and the honor of God, and as having renounced the domin- ion of sin, having become dead to it, so that it should no longer govern them. — Let not sin reign ; bear sway, like a king. || In your mortal hoihj. The body being the histrument which sin, in so many instances, employs, and the soul conceived of as residing in it, the expression is a very natural one, that sin rules in the hotly. The epithet mortal, here added, preserves the idea of death as connected with the body ; since not only is the body soon to die, and therefore it ought not to be allowed a goveniing influ- ence, but withal it subjects to death, in the higher sense, those who yield to its demands in disregard of the claims of God and of the spiritual natui-e. || Tliat ye should obey it in the lusts thei'eof; that ye should obey sin which seeks to lord it over you, as a ruling power, through the inordinate desires of the body, de- sires which originate in the body, or are gratified in the body, or pertain in various ways to our present bodily state. — Tiie word it relates to sin, and the word thereof to the body. The verse may become more intelligible by the folloAving paraphrase — Let not sin, therefore, reign in your mortal body, so that vou shall obey sin by yielding to the body's inordinate desires : — the body being here considered as the seat of many sinful indulgences, as the occa- sion of many sins, or the instniment which sin employs ; while yet all sin, whether relating to the body and the outward estate, or to the spirit of man, is here cautioned against. 13. The same idea, substantially, is again presented in an expanded form. Two masters, as it Avere, are here spoken of, to whose service the powers of man will be yielded, sin and God : Chiistians should not be in subjection to sin, but should yield themselves willing servants to God. — Neither yield ye your mem- bei's as instruments of unrighteousness to sin, etc. ; yield not the members of your body to sin. Our bodily powers are not to be surrendered to sin, as its instruments or tools, to do its bid- ding : we are to yield ourselves to God, to choose him for our Master, as those who have died to sin, who have become insensible to its de- mands and are liberated from its bondage, and who have arisen to a new life, being no more dead in sin, but alive to righteousness. || And your members unto God; and yield your members unto God, as instm- ments of righteousness. 14 The ground of the exhortation in verses 12, 13, or rather of encour- agement to obey it, is now presented. — For sin shall not have dominion over you ; sin is not to lord it over you. The control of sin over you is broken ; you arc liberated from its power: yield yourselves, therefore, to God. — But how comes it to pass, that sin has not dominion over the disciple of Christ, that he is liberated from 68 ROMANS. 15 What then ? shall we sin, because we are not under the its power and is no longer its bond- slave 1 The reason immediately fol- lows, II For ye are not under the law, hut under grace. The apostle here alludes to the moral principle which he fully expands and illustrates in chapter 7 : 7-25 ; namely, that the influence of a law, prohibiting a sin- ful desire, stimulates that desire, when directly encountering it, rather than deadens the desire ; it does not re- strain the sinful heart from seeking gratification ; so that if a sinner be under the power of mere laAv, and his heart be not in full concert with the law, lie will break it and incur its penalty. But genuine disciples of Christ are not under law, not under a legal system, since by their recep- tion of Christ, as a Redeemer from condemnation and sin, they are under a diflferent dispensation, and stand on a different footing, in relation to God, from the legal one : thus the laAv, as a governing system, is not then- lord, they are dead to its claims for a jus- tifying obedience on their part, and to its doom of death for disobe- dience. They do not stand in a legal relation to God, and are not treated by liim as if they were on that foot- ing. Legal influences are not those by which they are moved. Looked at from a legal position, they are dead to the law, 7 : 4 ; the laAV has ceased to have a hold on them. On the contrary, they are under grace ; under a system of mercy and favor, in which God acts towards them on the prin- ciple o^ favor on his part, not of good desert on theirs : the system is one of gratuities, not of merited compensa- tion for obedience to law. Being placed on such a footing, and having a new spirit in harmony with this method of treatment, and with its design of recovering them from sin, they can, though ill-deserving, be treated Avith positive favor, be ac- cepted of God, and reclaimed from sin ; they can be adopted as children of God, and enjoy the benefits of the filial relation, and the favorable treatment and discipline wliich that relation involves. Gratitude for God's love to them, and all generous emotions, are cherished, and the af- fectionate purpose of obedience wliich is characteristic of their new heart, is confirmed. By virtue of this new system, the Holy Spirit awakens and strengthens in them love to God, as their controlling principle. The spir- itual influence bestowed, and the in- genuous feelings excited, by this new system, overcome sinful tendencies, and affectionate filial obedience to God is secured. By this system, pro- vision is made for renewing power, pardoning mercy, and influence to strengthen the disciple in the course of righteousness. For these things a legal system makes no provision. Hence proceeds the encouragement to the disciples of Clirist, that sin shall not have dominion over them ; they are not under law, but under grace. 15-23. Plaving shown the utter incongruity of a sinful life with a believer's relation to Christ, as united to liim in deatli, and with his own avowed character and obligations, the apostle proceeds to the second part of the query proposed in the first verse, the query being sliglitly modified. A person, who did not properly apprehend tlie relation of grace in which the disciple of Christ stands, might naturally think that if a believer be not under law, but under grace, he would take en- couragement to indulge in sin. — Hence the question. If we are not under the law, but are on a foot- ing of grace, or favor, may we not then sin with impunity 1 What hin- drance is there to our sinning, if we are not held by the law 1 The apos- tle repels this suggestion by main- taining, that if we commit sin we are servants of sin, and consequently not seiwants of God, and must, therefore, receive the recompense of sin. The CHAPTER VI. 69 16 law, but under grace? God forbid. Know ye not, that to whom ye yield yourselves servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey ; whether of sin unto death, or of obedience unto righteousness ? But God be thanked, that ye were the servants of sin ; but ye have obeyed from the heart that form of doctrine which was delivered you. Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness : (I sj^eak after the manner of men, because of the infirmity of your flesh :) for as ye have yielded your 17 idea of two masters is again pre- sented, or of two opposite principles exercising control ; sin on the one hand, obedience on the other : and these two opposite principles, or kinds of service, are to be followed by their appropriate results. — The word seii'ants throughout this para- graph, vs. 15-23, whether in refer- ence to sin or in reference to right- eousness, is used as the opposite of free, or freed, men ; and men are here conceiAX'd of as being in subjection, that is, in servitude, either to sin, or to righteousness ; the servants of sin being in subjection to their master and not owning the sway of right- eousness, but living as if free from its sway and not bound by its claims ; and on the otlier hand, the servants of righteousness being in subjection to their master^ not owning the sway of sin, but being freed from it, eman- cipated from it. In both cases, the bondage is voluntaiy and involves the idea of personal responsibility as to the choice of masters. In the one case, however, inclination governs the person in disregard of the dictates of his reason and conscience, so that he is, emphatically, in a state of bond- age : while in the other case, sub- jection to righteousness is in perfect hai-mony with the free action of all the powers of man, the reason, the will, the atfections. The latter is, in brief, the only normal state of man, as a moral being. 16. To whom ye obey. The word to is here, in our modern style, super- fluous. II Unto death ; unto utter misery, spiritual and eternal death, as the result of the senace of sin. II Unto righteousness. The word right- eousness here includes the idea of jus- tif cation and its result, eternal life, standing as the opposite of death, or condemnation. 17. But God be thanked, etc. In applying the universal principle, con- tained in the 16th vei'se, to those whom he was addressing, the apostle renders thanks to God that, though they were formerly in bondage to sin, they had, from the heart, obeyed the gospel and become interested in its influences and blessings. || That ye were, etc. The cause for gratitude was the obedience which the Roman Christians ha^ rendered to the gos- pel. — In a sentence constructed like this, the point aimed at by the writer, or speaker, is contained in the latter part. Compare Matt. 9 : 14. || That form of doctrine, etc. ; the gospel of Christ, conceived of as a religious system, a form, or scheme, of relig- ious doctrine, mentioned with partic- ular reference to the doctrine of jus- tification and deliverance from sin by faith in Christ. 18. Being then made free, etc. ; be- ing now emancipated, liberated, from sin, ye have subjected yourselves, as servants, to righteousness : being freed from the yoke of sin, ye have come under the yoke of rigliteous- ness. 19. I speak after the manner of men, etc. ; I address you in a manner suggested by huuum affairs. — The Komans were well acquainted with slavery, as it was a condition com- mon in their country ; and this sub- 70 ROMANS. members servants to uncleanness and to iniquity unto in- iquity ; even so now yield your members servants to right- 20 eousness unto holiness. For when ye were the servants of 21 sin, ye were free from righteousness. What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed ? for the 22 end of those things is death. But now being made free from sin, and become servants to God, ye have your fruit 23 unto holiness, and the end everlasting life. For the wages of sin is death : but the gift of God is eternal Rfe, through Jesus Christ our Lord. ject furnished modes of expression well suited to illustrate deliverance from sin and subjection to God, and to impress the minds of those who were not accustomed to spiiitual and elevated contemplations. Though the service of God is not slavery, but a willing obedience, yet submis- sion to G od, and the surrender of all our powei-s to his will, would be at once apprehended, particularly by weaker minds, through this manner of speaking. The experience, also, which Christian readers had had of spiritual frailty, and of subjection to bodily appetites and other modes of sinful gratification, would help them to ap]>reciate the apostle's lan- guage. — This clause, though it stands in our version, as a pai-t of the 19th verse, is yet more properly an appendage to the 18th, as it evi- dently relates to the terms employed in that verse. || For as ye have, etc. Since they had become liberated from sin, and had become subject to right- eousness, they were expected to live accordingly. || Your members: your bodily members. 1| To uncleanness and to iniquity unto iniquity, etc. ; to unchastity Avith its kindi-ed defile- ments, and to general disregard of God's law, so as freely to practise iniquity. Instead of continuing such a course, employ your members, now, in the service of righteousness, so as to be truly holy. 20. For when ye were the servants of sin, etc. ; while ye Avere slaves of sin, ye were free in respect to right- eousness ; that is, ye felt and acted. as if exempted from the claims of righteousness, ye rendered it no ser- vice, ye abjured its claims, sin being your acknowledged master. This fact is here stated as an argument for the preceding exhortation ; as if the apostle had said. Do justice now to the claims of righteousness which you formerly diso\\aied. 21. 22. To strengthen the exhorta- tion, he appeals to their own judg- ment and feelings, as to the results of these opposite courses, one of them issuing in present shame and self- reproach and terminating, hereafter, in utter misery ; the other securing the satisfactions of holiness in heart and conduct, and terminating, here- after, in endless bliss. — muit fruit, etc. ; what profit did you gain from the unworthy deeds Avhich you for- merly practised ? 1| Death ; the utter misery consequent on being excluded from the favor of God. 22. He now presents the opposite spiritual condition and its opposite results. — Being made free, etc.; be- ing emancipated from sin, and come into subjection to God, having chosen him for your Master. 1| Ye have your fruit unto holiness, etc. ; you have the profit, the advantage, of holi- ness, which is accompanied with hap- piness on earth and issues in eternal life, in the endless bliss which springs from the px'esence and favor of God in heaven. 23. These opposite results aro easily explained. For the wages of sin is death. Sin pays its servants their wages, namely, death. The mis- CHAPTER VII. Believers in Christ, not under the legal system, 1-6. under a legal system, 7-25. Bondage of the human soul while cry consequent on exclusion from the presence and favor of God, is the appropriate recompense of sin. But wliile death is awarded to the servant of sin as his due, life eternal is be- stowed on the servants of God, not as what they may claim, in the light of a payment, but as a free gift from him through Christ. Having re- ceived Christ as their Redeemer and Lord, they are regarded as united to him, as belonging to him, and are, therefore, admitted to the blessings which he has secured, and for which they have here become prepared. CHAPTER Vn. Having disposed of the inquiiy whether Chri*5tians may sin because they arc not under law but under grace, the apostle now returns to the sentiment advanced in 6 : 14, which had suggested this inquiiy ; namely, sin shall not have dominion over you, because ye are not under the law, but under grace. That Christians are not under the law, and in what man- ner their removal from a legal posi- tion has been effected, lie shows in 7 : 1-6 ; that they could not obtain deliv- erance from the bondage of sin while under the law, or while in a state of legal relation to God, he illustrates in 7 : 7-25 ; and thus prepares the way for showing that deliverance comes to them through the state of grace provided by the gospel, and that those who are truly in Christ, united to him by faitli, are freed from con- demnation and from the servitude of sin. This is brought to view in 7 : 25 and in chapter 8th. In order to show that the disciples of Christ are not under the law, but are removed from a legal relation to a relation of grace, he states and ap- plies the principle, that a law is of force over a person only so long as, by the continuance of life, he is in a condition to be bound by it ; it con- templates a person as alive and in such circumstances as the law recog- nizes : death, however, intervening, sets aside the action of the law in reference to a person whose relations are by that occurrence essentially altered. In such a case the hold of a law ceases. Thus, a mairicd woman is bound by the law to her husband. During his life-time, she cannot unite herself to another without incurring guilt : but should her husband die, the law, in that particular, has no ap- plication to her ; it has lost its hold, and she is dead in regard to it. She is now at liberty to marry another. As the woman, in consequence of the death of her husband, became dead to that provision of the law and was at liberty to enter into the mamage relation with another, so by the death of Christ, as illustrating and vindi- cating the righteousness of God, 3 : 25, 26, the demands of the legal sys- tem are met and fully satisfied, and without any infraction of it, or disre- gard of it, men are at liberty to enter on a new an-angement, to transfer their allegiance from the law to Christ as the head of a new system, thus coming from under the demands and penalties of the law. Those Avho accept Chi'ist, or become united to him, are dead to the law, or the legal system, by virtue of Christ's death and then- participating in death with him, 6 : 8, or their union with him as one who has died. As the husband's death makes the wife dead in respect to a particular statute, so Chiist's death makes believers in him dead to the legal system. By virtue of their connection with him, they occupy a different ground from that of the law ; from the domain of law they have (71) 72 ROMANS. Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) hoAV that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth ? For the woman which hath a husband, is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth ; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. So then, if while her husband liveth, she be mar- ried to another man, she shall be called an adulteress : but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law ; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. Wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law by the body of Christ ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we passed to that of grace, and are to be dealt with, not according to the de- mands of law, but according to the provision of God's grace. While under the law, in their sinful state, they could live only in disobedience to the law and become doomed to its penalty, death ; but now, being united to Christ and enjoying the provision and influences of the system of grace, they enter on a new life towards God, render service to him and are accepted by him. 1 . The law. It is immaterial for the purpose of the illustration here intended, Avhether the apostle meant law in the abstract, or the Mosaic code, as an actual system, in particu- lar ; for in either case, law in respect to human society contemplates men as living ; it does not extend beyond death ; death puts an end to its con- trol. Thus viewed, the apostle's reasoning may be considered as grounded in the universal sentiments of men. His readers, too, were suiR- ciently acquainted with the nature of law to appreciate his argument, whe- ther they were Jews by birtli, or were Jewish proselytes, or had become Christians directly from a state of heathenism. When, however, we consider the apostle's habits of thought in regard to law, and those of the majority, at least, of his ear- liest readers, it is most reasonable to think that he had in mind the Mosaic code. This would appear, also, from the connection between the present paragraph and the 14th verse of the 6th chapter, where the Mosaic legal system is mentioned in contrast with the Christian system of grace. II A man ; a human being, a person. II So lonrj as he livdh ; that is, only so long as he liveth. 2. An illustration of the state- ment, just made by the apostle, now follows. For the woman ichich hath an husband. The form of expi-cssion in the original is, the icoman who is in subjection to a man ; and this view of a mamed woman's relation, as being in subjection to her husband, is spe- cially adapted to the apostle's pui-pose of instituting a parallel between a married woman, in reference to her husband, and human beings, in refer- ence to the law of God to which they ai-e, from their very nature, subject. II She is loosed from the law of her hus' band ; from the law which defines and regulates her relation to her husband. From this law she is i-eleased by the death of her husband ; his death ter- minates her subjection to him. 3. So then, etc. Though during his life she could not rightfully take a different husband, yet liis death puts her at liberty to do so. Her hus- band's death made her dead to that law, so that there is no legal hin- drance to her forming another con- nection. 4. The parallel case is now stated. It is not, however, stated with minute CHAPTER VII. 73 5 should bring forth fruit unto God. For when we were in the flesh, the motions of sin, which were by the law, did accuracy, but substantially and witli particular reference to the event of aeatli, as opening the way for a change of relation. In applying the illustration, the apostle, since he wished to present distinctly and strongly the main thought, that Chris- tians are dead to the law, and are not under it, commences with the death in reference to believers which the death of Christ had effected. Ye also are become dead to the law ; you are re- leased from the law as to its demands and penalties, you are to it as dead, it has lost its dominion in respect to you. II By the body of Christ; by the body of Christ as having been put to death ; by the death of Christ. — As if the apostle had said, Christ has died, and you as being united to Christ, share in the results of his death. By his death the demands of the law were satisfied ; and on you, consequently, as being united with him, it has no further demands. A husband's death terminates the wife's subjection to a particular statute, in consequence of her having been one with him and of her sharing in what- ever affected him : so Christ's death has terminated the Christian's sub- jection to the legal system in conse- quence of his union with Christ and sharing in whatever affects Him. — The idea of union with Christ per- vades the apostle's view ; to appre- hend it full}^, Ave should have in mind the figure of the vine and its branches, John 15 : 1-7, the body and its members, Eph. 5 : 23-32. Oneness with Christ would not be too strong an expression to show the bearing on Christ's disciples of whatever per- tains to him. Compare John 17 : 21-23. II That ye should be married to another; that ye should become another's, that ye might enter into relation with anotlier. || Even to him who is raised from the dead. Christ, as raised from the dead, is the Lord and Head with whom tiiis new con- nection may be formed. He is the head of the system of grace to which we may become transferred from the bondage of the law. || That we should bring forth fruit unto God; that we might be fruitful in works of obedience to God, might render him acceptable service in holy lives. The resurrection of Christ was necessary for this, because the bestowal of the Holy Spirit for our renovation to a holy life was to be consequent on his resurrection. John 16 : 7. The resurrection and ascension of Christ were essential to the completeness and the full operation of the system of grace. 1 Pet. 3: 21, 22. *Matt. 28 : 18-20. The Holy Spirit's agency in this system makes us new creatures in our will and affections, gives us a new spirit, delivers us from the domi- nation of sin, so that we do not yield our powers to its sway. 6 : 17, 18. 5. For ichen we were in the flesh. The apostle now shows why we must become connected with Christ as raised from the dead, in order that we may be fruitful in obedience to God ; that is, Avhy we must become released from the legal system and come under the system of grace, in order to lead holy lives. — In the flesh. Our bodily nature gives occasion and opportunity for many sinful indul- gences : the bodily members are in- struments which sin employs. 6 : 12, 13. To be in the flesh, then, is to be in subjection to sinful appetites. It is the opposite of being in the Spirit, that is, in subjection to the Spirit, or of being in a renewed, spir- itual state. Flesh is the carnal nature, taken comprehensively, as including sins of the spirit, as Avell as of the body. II The motions of sins, ivhich were by the law ; the emotions of sins, or sinful affections, Avhich were awak- ened, excited, by the law ; sinful af- fections which, through abuse of the law, made it a provocative of sin, instead of its being a director in holy 74 ROMANS 6 work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death : but now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held ; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter. obedience. || Wrought in our mem- bers ; became vigorously active in subjecting our bodily members to the service of sin, so that, instead of being fruitful in obedience to God, we were fruitful in obedience to Death : death being here personified, as the power which executes the doom of exclusion from the presence and favor of God. 6. But now ; now that we are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, in sub- jection to the Holy Spirit and enjoy- ing his renewing influence, we are no longer under the law, we are re- leased from it as a system for procur- ing the divine favor ; Ave are no longer held bound by its demands which we could not satisfy and which, instead of being obeyed by us, would rather awaken and stimulate sinful affections in us and thus, instead of procuring us salvation, would make us work out our ruin. || That being dead wherein ice were held. The gen- uine reading here, according to cor- rect editions of the original Greek, is, being dead, or having become dead to that in which, or by which, we were held : not that the law is dead, but loe are dead to the law. The apostle describes those who have accepted the system of grace, by uniting them- selves to Christ who submitted to death, verse 4, as having become dead to the law, to the legal system, under which they were previously held. The idea is the same as is conveyed in the 4th verse. Ye arc become dead to the law. || That ive shoidd serve in newness of spirit, etc. The result of this death to the law, this transfer of ourselves to the system -of grace, and of this choice of Christ as our Ke- deemer and Loi*d is, that we now ren- der service to God with a new spirit, a new temper of mind, a spirit which prompts a cheerful and loving obedi- ence, as commg spontaneously from the heart which beats in unison with that of Christ. This 7iew spirit is contrasted Avith the oldness of the let- ter, or, of the writing, that is, the old ivritten law, the system of statutes and penalties, the system Avhich could only require obedience to authorita- tive demands as the ground of ac- ceptance Avith God, Avhile yet the hearts of men Avere indisposed to obedience. From subjection to this system and from the fatal results Avhich, since men have no heai't to obey the laAv, are inevitable, Christ delivei'S all who Avelcome him as their Lord. — The apostle does not here in- timate that, in point of fact, there ever Avere tAvo Avays for men's accept- ance Avith God ; one, through a per- sonal legal obedience ; the other, through diA'ine grace. The latter has been the only possible Avay ever since man became a sinner. But he is here reasoning with special refer- ence to JcAVS, Avho were A-ainly cher- ishing the thought that, through obedience to the Mosaic law, they were enjoying favor Avith God and Avould attain eternal life. Taking them on their OAvn ground, he unfolds the nature and tendency of a legal system and of the system of grace, in vicAV of the actual state of men's hearts, and thus shows the neces- sity of the gracious system through Christ, of AA'hich, since all need it, all may avail themselves. Though the salvation of men has always pro- ceeded from grace, yet it is only in the gospel of Christ' that the system of grace is fully made knoAAm and dcA'eloped, since its basis is in tlic life and death of Christ. PrcAdously to his advent, men avIio had the right temper of mind Avere pardoned and accepted ; still, their acceptance Avas an act of grace, having the same re- CHAPTER VII. 75 7 What shall we say then ? Is the law sin ? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law : for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. lation to Christ as the acceptance of penitent and believing- sinners under the gospel, or subsequently to the actual death of Christ. See' Heb. 9 : 15. Compare Kev. 13 : 8. AVhile, however, salvation has always been impossible for sinners by a legal sys- tem, no mistake is more common than for men to suppose that by some works of righteousness of their own they can obtain fovor with God : and hence, the apostle's reasoning has value for all men. For whoever, through any causes, declines the pro- posals of the gracious system and seeks eternal life according to the terms of a legal system, must fiul of becoming righteous in the sight of God and of ha-ving spiritual life, be- cause he is actually a sinner and a egal system contains no provision li)r acceptance after disobedience, or for recovering sinners to holiness : he will also inevitably fail of rendering- such an obedience as the holy law prescribes, because in his inmost heart he is indisposed to such obedi- ence ; and any supposed obedience to mere authority, while the authority is disliked and the heart is not in ac- cordance with the law, is of no ac- count in the sight of God. 7-12. What shall ice say then, etc. In 6 : 14 the apostle had said, Sin shall not have dominion over you, for ye are not under the law ; imply- ing, that sin would rule over them so long as they should be under the law. This might seem a reflection on the law, as though it gave aid to sin and was of a sinful tendency. He had also just said, 7 : 5, that sinful affec- tions were stimulated by the law. The. inquiry then would naturally arise. Whether the law was sinful, the blamable cause of sin. He re- plies, By no means : neveitheless, the law becomes the occasion of activity to a sinful inlination, the existence of which was hardly before suspected. Thus the law leads to a distinct con- sciousness of sin and illdesert, and of inability, under the influence and guidance of the law, to secure eternal life ; a sinful disposition being ex- cited, by the law's laying restraints on it, to resist the law and thus in- evitably incurring its penalty, death, spiritual ruin. The law, then, so far from being sinful, or in itself the cause of sin, is holy, opposed to all sin. Viewed in itself and as a direc- tory to an obedient spirit, it leads to life and bliss. 7. Is the law sin ? Is the law sin- ful 1 Is it the cause of sin ? Is its tendency sinful ? || God forbid. See 3:4. II Nay. The word neverthe- less, or still, represents more accu- rately the apostle's word. He had strongly disavowed the thought, that the law was sinful ; but while that thought was not, for a moment, to be entertained, it was still, or nevertheless, true that the law was a means of pro- ducing a distinct consciousness of sin. While it docs not lead to sin, but for- bids it, it is yet an occasion of sin's exerting its power, and thus makes us sensible that we are sinners. || For I had not known lust, except, etc. By a particular commandment in the law, the apostle illustrates his thought that the law leads to a distinct con- sciousness of sin. The word lust was formerly used in a more general sense than at present, and was equivalent to inordinate desire or coveting. In the original of this verse and the fol- lowing, the same word, substantially, is used for lust, covet, and concupis- cence; so that the apostle's idea in the 7th and 8th verses might be more directly couAcyed by the following language — For I should not have known coveting, unless the law had said. Thou shalt not covet ; but sin, taking occasion by the command- 76 ROMANS. 8 But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin 9 was dead. For I was alive without the law once : but when 10 the commandment came, sin revived, and I died. And the commandment which was ordained to life, I found to he unto 11 death. For sin, taking occasion by the commandment, de- 12 ceived me, and by it slew me. Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good. ment, -wrought in me all manner of covetm^. 8. Sin, taking occasion, etc. Sin is here regarded as an active inter- nal power. Sinful inclination, stimu- lated by this prohibition, became un- usually vigorous. Such is human experience ; a latent and dormant in- clination to a certain thing becomes aroused, and demands gratification, in consequence of a prohibition to its indulgence. || Without the law, etc. ; aside from the law, at a distance, so to speak, from the law, sin lay in- active, had not betrayed its existence and power. 9. For I was alive without the laio once, etc. ; up to a certain period, while away from tlie pressure of the law, not distinctly apprehending and feeling its claim on me, I was free from disquietude, Avas happy in my supposed enjoyment of the good will of God. and a sure hope of heaven. But when the commandment, men- tioned in verse 7, came in contact with me and I felt its pressure, then sin put forth a new life in resisting the command and promising gratifi- cation from disobeying it, and I sunk into misery through a sense of guilt and apprehension of the displeasure of God. My consciousness of being under the power of sin destroyed my enjoyment and my hope of future bliss, and made me sensible that I had within me no spiritual life. 10. The commandment, etc. That very commandment which pointed * out the path of righteousness and was thus designed to secure life, that is, true bliss, issued in producing death tome. 11. For sin taking occasion by the commandment deceived me, etc. ; when the commandment, the prohibition mentioned in verse 7, was distinctly apprehended by me and its force was felt, sin promised me gratification from disobedience ; but it deceived my expectation of enjoyment and wrought out misery foi* me instead of happiness : it slew me, brought me into a state of death, making me sen- sible of my subjection to depraved inclinations, of my condemnation in the sight of God and my inability, by any moral strength of my own, to avert his displeasure and attain eternal life. I felt myself doomed to death, as a deluded victim of sin. 12. Wherefore the law is holy, etc. Since, then, the law is only the occa- sion of sin by coming in collision with a sinful inclination and laying its prohibitions on it, the law itself is holy, announcing the holy will of God in opposition to all sin ; and eveiy commandment of the law, like the one instanced in verse 7, is holy, just and good in its requisition and its ten- dencies. 13-25. The view just given of the law of God suggests another inquiry : Was that which is a good thing and adapted to secure bliss, namely, the holy and good law of God, made the cause of death to me ? Is my death, that is, my loss of the divine favor and my exclusion from all bliss and hope, tiie fruit of a good law ? By no means, the apostle replies : Sin is the cause of this death ; and since it brings about death by occasion of a law which is in itself holy and good, tlie nature of sin, as only evil and CHAPTER VII. 77 13 Yf AS then that which is good made death unto me ? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good ; that sin bv the commandment 14 might become exceeding sinful. For we know that the law malij>:nant, becomes thereby fully manifest. The law, too, as we all know, is spiritual, requiring a spir- - itual, or holy, obedience and a spiritual mind in order to render such obedi- ence, and recompensing such obedi- ence with eternal life: but I, on whom the demands of this law came with pressure, am carnal, sinful, even in bondage to sin ; and being thus under its sway, sin controls me, so that the dictates of my judgment and moral nature, which approve of the divine law, are overmastered, and I do not act according to my couA'ic- tions of right ; that which I approve I fail to perform ; that which I con- demn and cannot but hate, I yet do. Sin overpowers me ; so that it is not so much I who act, as sin that lords it over me. It is sin, then, to which I am in bondage, that is working out my ruin ; and not the holy and good law. Thus miserably enslaved by sin, I can be delivered from its power, and from the death to which it in- evitably leads, only by ceasing vainly to strive for spiritual life and the favor of God by means of the law, and by coming into the state of grace through faith in Christ, that is, through uniting myself to him as , the head of the system of grace, my Redeemer and Lord, and thus secur- ing to myself the benefits and in- fluences of this system. 13. That which is good ; the law, mentioned in verse 12. || That it \ might appear siti : rather, that sin / might be made to appear, that it might be manifested as to its evil and I malignant nature and be no longer concealed under a deceitful garb. Compare verse 11. || That sin — might become exceeding sinful ; that sin might, by occasion of the command- ment, go to great lengths in trans- gressing the law, and thus, by means of the law which forbade its indul- gence, it might become worse and worse. Compare 5 : 20. 14. For we know. It is not sur- prising that sin should thus abuse the law of God and increase its vio- lations of it. Tliis the apostle re- gards as resulting from the spmtual, or holy, nature of the law acting on a mind that is sinfully inclined and is in bondage to sin as its ruUng power. II The law is spiritual; it requires a spiritiial, or holy, service, and conse- quently a spiritual mind in order to render that service. || But I am car- nal. So far from having the needed spiritual mind, I am carnal, fleshly, disposed to obey tlie impulses and in- dulge the appetites of the flesh, in- stead of obeying the dictates of the Spirit. I am the very opj)Osite of what is required. — As the body, or the flesh, is the seat of so many sin- ful appetites, and the members of the body are the means by which a sinful inclination gratifies itself, to he in the flesh, or to be carnal, is the same as to be sinful, to he under the influence of sin, to be sinfully disposed. It is ex- pressive, therefore, of sinfulness, a source of sin, a sinful state, in general, whether the sins consist in bodily in- dulgence, or are strictly internal. Compare Gal. 5 : 19-21. It is the opposite of being spii-itual, of being under the influence of the Holy Spirit Avhich awakens lioly desires and leads to a holy hfe. A carnal, or unspiritual, mind is aftirmed of all persons, whether unregeuerate or regenerate, so far as they are not in subjection to the Holy Spirit in their feelings and conduct : hence, it was ascribed to the Corin- thian Christians, 1 Cor. 3 : 3, 4, who had so far lost the tinily Christian temper of mind as to be indulging in dissensions ; a course of conduct more characteiistic of worldly men 78 ROMANS. 15 is spiritual: but I am carnal, sold under sin. For that which I do, I allow not : for what I would, that do I not ; 16 but what I hate, that do I. If then I do that which I would 17 not, I consent unto the law that it is good. Now then it is 18 no more I that do it, but sin that dwelleth in me. For I thanof the spiritually minded. || Sold under sin ; bought, as it were, by sin and reduced to bondage by it as an imperious master, so as to do its bid- ding rather than what my own sober judgment would dictate. 15. The proof, or illustration, of the remark that he was a bondslave of sin, now follows. As a slave is subject to the will and command of his master and thus acts by another's bidding, not by his own judgment and choice, and may not be pleased with what he is doing, nor approve of it, and might seem to himself to be often acting without knowing what he was doing, so it is with one in bondage to sin. — For that which I do I allow not ; literally, / know not ; I scarcely know what I am doing, I am so impelled by a power that sAvays me and overrides my sober convic- tions. — The original word, here ren- dered alloio, but more correctly know, has sometimes the accessary idea oi approving, that is, of knowing with approval. The idea of allowing and disallowing, or of approval and disap- proval, is, however, more directly ex- pressed in the following clause ; while this clause rather indicates a mind doubting whether to do a thing or not, beclouded by sinful desire, half willing and half-unwilling to do the sinful deed, and yet yielding to sinful desire, as if impelled, without being fully aware of thus doing. H For what I ivoiild, that do I not, etc. The term would here is indicative of the desire, or preference, which the soul of man cannot but feel for that wbich is morally good, when it is soberly reflected on. It does not indicate a settled, determined choice, but a lik- ing, or wishing. The apostle, then, may be understood as saying, For what I like, what in itself and accord- ing to my sober judgment I approve, and wish to do, I do not perform ; but Avhat I cannot help hating, that I actually do. So truly has sinful in- clination the mastery, that I sacrifice my sober preferences to it ; I am held bound by sinful desire ; under its in- fluence, what I prefer I fail to do, but what I dislike and condemn that I do : such is the power of sin over me. Compare Gal. 5 : 17. 16. If then I do that lohich I icould not, Iconse72t unto the law, etc. Since, then, in my judgment I disapprove of what I do in transgressing, and dislike it, I thereby pronounce in favor of the law which forbids what I do : the law has a testimony in my reason and conscience that it is really good. Compare verse 12. 17. Noio then it is no more I that do it but sin, etc. Now, too, since I pronounce in favor of the law which I violate, and since I do not act in harmony with my convictions of what is right, but in opposition to them, it is henceforth not I myself, I in the full and free exercise of the faculties of my nature, I as endowed with reason and conscience, who act ; but sin that dwells in me is the acting power. Sin, an impeiious master within me, performs the deeds through me. — The apostle here personifies sin, representing it as a pei-sonal agency within the soul, lording it over the rational and moral natui-e : as though there were two opposing powers within him, reason Avith conscience, on one side, and sinful desire, on the other; and sinful desire actually bav- ing the predominance and controlling his actions. Without a figure, it is strong sinful inclination, a bent to- wards sin, the apostle here speaks of, that impels a person to a sinful act, or course, in opposition to his ■ ao chaptp:r VII. 79 18 know that in me, (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing : for to will is present with me ; but how to perform 19 that which is good, I find not. For the good that I would, 20 I do not ; but the evil which I would not, that I do. Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin 21 that dwelleth in me. I find then a law, that when I would 22 do good, evil is present w4th me. For I delight in the law 23 of God, after the inward man : but I see another law in my members warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. 24 w^'etched man that I am ! who shall deliver me from the 25 body of this death ? I thank G-od, through Jesus Christ knowledgment of the claims of God's law and to the dictates of his sober judgment. 18-20. In confirmation of the thought that sin was the actor, the apostle declares it as a matter of his consciousness that in him A'iewed as carnal, destitute of the Holy Spirit, (goodness did not dwell, as a predom- inating power; since while to like and A\ish for what is good was near him, to perform Avhat is good was far away from him, he could not reach it : the one was within his reach, was easy ; the other Avas far beyond him, he found not access to it, his efforts to attain it were baffled. — In me, that is, in my flesh ; in me, while, or so far as, under the influence of the flesh, or nnspiritual : so far as the Spirit is not ruling me, goodness does not dwell in me ; it is sin that actuates me. Compare Gal. 5 : 17. || Fortoioillis present loith me, etc.; to like and pre- fer what is good is within my reach, but actually to do it is beyond me ; for sin sways me and not goodness, and I do the evil, notwithstanding my convictions of duty and my sense of the preferableness of the good. 21. Iflnd then a law, etc. ; I find within me a governing principle, which, though I cannot but like, and approve of, the good, makes me do the evil : evil is ever near at hand and I yield to it, notwithstanding my discex-nment of the right and the de- cision of my judgment in its favor. 22, 23. The proof, or illustration, of this predominating power of sin, in the absence of the Spirit, is now given in a very emphatic manner. — For I de- light in the law of God after the inward man ; that is, in my soul : my judg- ment and moral convictions are de- cidedly in favor of the law of God, and I take delight in contemplating it. But I perceive in my members, in my bodily, or sensual, nature, another law, another ruling principle, namely, sinful appetite, opposing the law which my rational and moral nature approves, and subjugating me, as a captive, to the law of sin, that law which rules in my bodily mem- bers and subjects my sensual nature to itself. 24. tiretched man, etc. Thus being a captive to sin and acting ac- cording to its impulses rather than to my own sober judgment and moral sense, I am a wretch indeed, and despair of rescuing myself from this bondage. || Who shall deliver me? Is there any one who can deliver me 1 To whom can I look for deliverance ? II Froin the body of this death ; or, from this body of death ; from this body, this sensual nature, which sin subjects to itself and which, under such subjection, leads to deatli (com- pare 8 : 13), that is, to hopeless misery in exclusion from the favor of God and in the endurance of his frown and Avi-ath. 25. / thank God through Jesus 80 ROMANS. our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God ; but with the flesh the law of sin. Christ our Lord. Tlie law gives no hope of deliverance ; but the gospel of Christ, the system of grace through Christ, inspires hope. Through Jesus Christ deliverance can come ; for he bestows the Spirit who imparts a new life and sets up a new dominion in man. || So then with the mind, etc. As the result of the preceding view of his sinful and enslaved condition aside from the influence of the Spirit through Jesus Christ, the apostle makes a personal statement : In my mind, that is, my reason and con- science, I acknowledge the goodness and claims of the law of God and my duty to obey it ; but in my flesh, my bodily members, my sensual na- ture, I obey the law of sin. — The over- throw of this sway of sin, by the new- creating Spii-it of God is indispensa- ble to the reign of righteousness in a human being, or to the subjection of the whole man to the dominion of God. In this chapter the apostle seems to have spoken from his own ex- perience of his sinfulness. At va- rious times in his life, we may well believe, he felt the pressui-e of the divine law on his conscience, and con- viction was awakened that he was not guiltless. His endeavors for a more strict conformity to it, in feeling and conduct, were unsatisfactory; and notwithstanding all his ceremonial obedience and his general freedom from pain of conscience, he doubtless was dissatisfied with himself at times. Not until he found true and abiding peace through believing in Christ, tvas he free from conscious servitude to sin. And after this turning point in his religious history, he knew of a con- flict between the flesh and the Spirit. Self-acquaintance, no doubt, led him to say to the Galatians, Gal. 5 : 16, 17, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lusts of the flesh ; for the flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the flesh. He nowhere else enters so much into detail, as here, in regard to the Avorkings of two opposing influences ; but the lan- guage throughout this chapter is most naturally explained, as disclosing his own mental exercises. In these he was, doubtless, a specimen of human nature : those who know their own hearts in reference to the law of God have an inward commentary on his language. Eemarkably similar to his ideas here is the passage in Gala- tians, 5 : 16, 17, ending with the re- mark, So that ye cannot do the things that 3-e would. Universally, the in- fluence of the divine law on the un- regenerate spirit fully shows the bon- dage of such a spirit to sin and the inevitable tendency to spiritual ruin ; and in all, both regenerate and unregenerate, so far as the heart, through any unfavorable cii'cum- stances, is not under the influence of the Holy Spirit and of a conscious practical dependence on Christ and the system of free grace, the over- powering influence of sin is felt. To the renewed, as well as the unrenewed, the influences of the system of grace are indispensable for their deliverance from sin and for their spiritual life. In both, the sensual nature, so far as not subordinated to the Spirit of God, is a source of sin, and proves stronger than the preferences and wishes awak- ened by a view of what is right. Even the apostle felt the necessity of keeping his body under and bringing it into subjection, 1 Cor. 9 : 27, lest that after having preached to others he should himself be a castaway. For illustrating the apostle's de- scription, it is not necessary to resort to grosser forms of sin. While such forms of sin do, indeed, forcibly illus- trate it, the workings of a dishonest, and of an ambitious, heart in full view of the demands of God's law furnish, also, ample illustration : our self-love, when not subordinated to the love of God, may easily create CHAPTER VIII. BelicTcrs in Christ are delivered from the bondage of sin through the Iloly Spirit who abides in them, 1-4. They have an affection for spiritual tilings, and the promise of a resurrec- tion, 5-11. The obligations, filial privileges, and blissful assurances, connected with the sjstem of grace, 12-39. 1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after such a conflict between duty and in- clination as is here described : and in tliose affections, purposes and acts which more directly relate to God, our weakness and vacillation and dc- clinins: to obey the commands of God, and our thus contracting increased guilt and strengthening the imperious sway of sin over us, and our falling deeper and deeper into a sense of present misery, with the prospect of a hopeless doom, are matters of daily occurrence. Those, too, who have the most satisfactory evidence of hav- ing been renewed by the Holy Spirit, are fully sensible that tlieir ability to do the will of God is dependent on the Spirit's continued influence. — Compare 1 Cor. 15 : 10. Gal. 2: 20. CHAPTER Vni. In 7 : 1-5, the apostle had shown that by the death of Christ the legal system wliicii inevitably brings men into hopeless condemnation, had been terminated in respect to those who connect themselves with Christ as the head of a new aiTangement, tlie sys- tem of grace. By virtue of this union with him as their Lord, they are enabled, Avith the new spirit im- paited to them, to live in obedience to God and to glorify him. The treatment of the two questions sug- gested by the apostle's view of the divine law, namely. Is the law sin 1 and. Was that which is good made death to me ? 7 : 7, 13, and which occupied tlie chief part of the 7tli chapter, had brought into very bold relief the utter hopelessness of a sin- ner's rendering a legal obedience and (81) of freeing himself from condemnor tion. The way is now thoroughly prepared to resume the consideration of the new system, the scheme of grace : and in'the present chapter the apostle affirms that those who accept Christ as their Lord and Head are freed from condemnation ; for the dominion, or ruling power of the Holy Spirit imparted to them through Jesus Christ, has liberated them from the enslaving dominion of sin, in order that they might obey the will of God, vs. 1-4. As enjoA-ing the influence of the Holy Spi'rit, who abides in them, they have a spiritual bent of mind, an affection for spiritual things, and the promise of a resurrec- tion, 5-11. The obligations, groAV- ing out of the new relation to God into which the system of grace has brought believers,' as being under the influence of the Holy Spirit and as being childien of God, together with the blissful assurances which are war- ranted by the system of grace, are also here presented, 12-39. 1. There is therefore vote no con- demnation, etc. Freedom from con- demnation is impossible to men through the law, or the legal system : but Christ has established a system of grace ; those, therefore, who are in Christ, that is, Avho have become united to Christ by faith in him, are no longer under the law, but are under grace. See 6 : 14. The law, as a means of justification through obed - ence, or of condemnation for disobe- dience, has ceased in respect to them- They now stand on a different ground from that of the law, so that thev are 82 ROMANS. 2 the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus 3 hath made me free from the law of sin and death. For what the laiv could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful beyond the application of its con- demnatory sentence. il Who icalk, etc. ; who live not according to the impulses of the carnal nature, of which sin avails itself, but according to the influences of the Holy Spirit ■vvho gives a new life to the soul, or imparts power to man's spiritual nature. 2. Being thus in Christ, and under grace, the Holy Spirit, as a sanctify- ing agent for securing the purposes of the system of grace, influences them with his life-imparting power and delivers them from the dominion of sin. — The law of the Spirit of life; the iiiling power, or dominion, of the Holy Spirit which imparts spir- itual life to the soul and secures etei*- nal life. || In Christ Jesus ; by Christ Jesus. Compare Jolm 7 : 39, where the bestowal of the Spirit is spoken of as connected with the exaltation of Jesus to glory ; also John 16:7, etc. The liberation from sin which results from the Spirit's agency is also traceable to Christ, since by him the system of grace Avas founded and the Spirit sent forth. See John 1 5 : 26. 16 : 7. II Hath made vie free, etc. ; hath liberated me from the rul- ing power, or dominion, of sin, which dominion inevitably issues in death, the final misery of a soul re- jected of God and abiding under condemnation. Sin had been a rul- ing power in the soul, making it dead as to any service to God and subjecting it to the death of exclu- sion from the favor of God and, con- sequently, from all true bliss. The counteracting dominion of the Spirit had overthrown this sway of sin and given spiritual liberty to the captive. The apostle here uses the personal mode of speech, ' hath made me free,' in harmony with the mode of speak- ing in tlie 7th chapter and in order to make the contrast more striking be- tween the two states in which he con- ceived of himself as heing ; namely, as first being under tlie influence of the law and next under the influence of the system of grace : in both of the views in which he presents himself, he is a specimen of human nature, an illustration of what is naturally to be expected in human beings sim- ilarly situated. — It is not necessary to consider the apostle as here affirm- ing respecting himself an entire and final liberation from all influence of sin : he affirmed a liberation from its thraldom, so that it did not bear sway in him, subjecting him to itself. The extent of this liberation, in any case, may be dependent on a variety of circumstances. 3. The ground of this deliverance from the sway of sin is now presented. For, lohat the law could not do, in that it was weak, etc. The legal system was unable to secure obedience from men, so strong and controlling was the carnal disposition in its resistance to the law : but what was impossible to be accomplished through the law, God has eftected in another way. — The inability of the law to subdue sin, or to overcome the carnal disposition in man, has been fully illustrated in tlie 7th chapter. |i God, sending his own Son, etc. God, having sent his own Son in the flesh, so that he was like man in having that nature which sin had subjected to itself, and having sent him with special reference to sin, has in his person effectually con- demned sin : in the very nature over Avhich sin had triumphed, a condem- nation of it has been etFected and a triumph over it gained. Christ by coming in human nature was, though sinless, like those who had sinned , and the human nature in Christ, that is, the flesh, (by having wliich in com- CHAPTER VIII. 83 4 flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh : that the right- eousness of the law might be fulfilled in us, who walk not 5 after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For they that are after the flesh do mind the things of the flesh : but they that are Uion Avitli man, he Avas, though sin- less, like those who had sinned,) ef- fectually resisted sin, was victorious over it and exposed it as condemned and subjugated. — This condemnation of sin was effected by the overpowex'- ing holiness of Christ, througli which every temptation to sin v/as overcome and lie obeyed most perfectly the law of God ; also, by his sacriticial death, in "which while suflrering for sins, the just for the unjust, 1 Pet. 3 : 18, he most impressively showed God's con- demnation of sin. Thus in human flesh, tlu-ough which sin had brought aiiOut condemnation to men by sub- jecting them to its sway, in human flesh as borne by Christ in common with man, sin is itself condemned and divested of its power. — 1| And for sin; either, icith reference to sin, an expres- sion denoting generally the design for which God sent his Son, namely, that sin might be effectually con- demned and its power broken ; or, a sacrifice for sin, Heb. 10 : 6, 8, 12, denoting specifically his death, which, being endured on account of sin, con- tained an emphatic condemnation of it and secured the overthrow of its power. II Condemned sin ; not merely pronounced condemnation on it, for this was done by the law ; but effec- tually condemned it, so that it was brought down to a subjugated state, its dominion was broken, it was ex- posed as condemned and enfeebled. II In the flesh ; in human nature, as borne, however, by Christ. — Thus in the person of Christ, and in a nature like sinful man's, God had effected what the law could not do, since car- nal inclination was too strong to be effectually withstood by it. 4. This effectual condemnation of sin had for its design, the obedience of Christ's disciples to the precepts of that law, which men's carnal in- clination will not obey. To the dis- ciples of Christ the Holy Spirit has been imparted : by his influence on them they cease to live in subjection to the flesh. The dominion of the Spirit has broken the domniion of sin, and they now obey the will of God. The righteousness of the law; or, the righteous requirement of the law ; that is, its collective body of precepts as enjoining the Avill of God. II Might hefuljilled ; performed, obey- ed. To what extent the law, or will, of God is actually obeyed by believ- ers is not here the object of remark ; but the intent, or design, of God to secure complete obedience to his will. Comparatively speaking, that is, as compared with other men and with their former selves, the disciples of Christ obey the will of God ; and the tendency of the new spirit which they possess is towards universal and per- fect obedience. Among them, and only among them, is obedience to the divine will exemplified on earth. II In us ; in us individually, and among us collectively. || Who walk, etc. See verse 1. Disciples of Christ are here characterized as those in whom the flesh, that is, carnal affec- tion, or inclination, has given way to the Spirit, so that they follow the monitions of the Spirit and have a spiritual tendency of thought and feeling. 5. This spiritual tendency is in- dispensable to obedience ; because carnal affection is towards carnal things, not towards those which the law enjoins ; the law being spiritual, requiring the subjection of our spirit to the will of God. The law, then, is in direct opposition to carnal affec- tion, which leads us to seek earthly and personal gratifications, and con- fines our desires and pursuits to the present world, the region of flesh and 84 ROMANS. 6 after the Spirit, the things of the Spirit. For to be carnally minded is death ; but to be spiritually minded is life and 7 peace : because the carnal mind is enmity against God : for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. 8 9 So then they that are in the flesh cannot please God. But ye are not in the flesh, but in the Spirit, if so be that the Spirit of God dwell in you. Now, if any man have not the sense. They that are after the flesh do mind, etc. ; they whose temper of mind is carnal, in accordance with sensual and worldly desires, have affection for carnal things merely, and consequently disregard spiritual things, the things which God requires us to love. But in order to have af- fection for spiritual things and thus obey the will of God, we must have a temper of mind accordant with the Spirit. — In other words, subjection to the fl(-sh is utterly inconsistent with obedience to the law of God, since God requires a supreme regard to his will and a decided preference of spiritual things. Carnal men will have affection for carnal things ; in order to have affection for spiritual things, men must be spiritual : the Spirit, not the flesh, must be the rul- ing power. 6. For to he carnally minded, etc. Another reason for the necessity of a spiritual dom.inion in man is, that the natural and inevitable result of being carnally minded, that is, of loving and pursuing carnal things, is death, rejection from God's favor and from all bliss ; while genuine life, living to good purpose for the present and the future, and peace, freedom from dread, bliss, both present and anticipated, in possessing God's favor, can come only from being spiritually minded, from loving and pursuing spiritual things. 7. The disastrous result of carnal affection is next accounted for. The carnal mind, etc. ; literally, according to the original, tlie minding of the flesh ; the indulging of carnal atiections, is direct hostility to God and makes him hostile to us ; of course, it must issue in death to the soul, li For it is not subject, etc. The direct hostility of the carnal temper to God and its making him an enemy to us comes from its entire opposition to his law ; it is a refusing to submit to him. II Neither indeed can be. A carnal disposition cannot, in the very nature of things, be in subjection to the law of God, for it is the direct contrast of that law ; it must cease to be a carnal disposition in order to be sub- ject to it. The contrast is the same as between sin and holiness. 8. Tluy that are in the flesh cannot please God. They who are ruled by carnal affection cannot please God, because such affection is directly at variance with him ; and while they are governed by it, they cannot but offend him. Besides, they are so much under its influence that it sways them even against their judgment and conscience. See 7 : 18-23. A new spirit must be possessed by them before they can please God. 9. Freedom from the carnal tem- per, and ability to please God, de- pend on the presence and agency of the Spirit of God in the soul. * Ye are not in the flesh, etc. Ye are not carnal, but spiritual, if indeed, agree- ably to your avowal of belonging to Christ, the Spirit of God dwell in you. Compare John 14: 16,17. 1 Cor. 6 : 9-1 1 . II Now if; more conectly, Bid if: the contrast of the |3reccding statement is here made. 1| 2 lie Spirit of Christ. Tlie expressions. Spirit of God and Spirit of Christ, are sub- stantially the same ; the Holy Spirit being thus variously denominated as sent forth either by the Father or the Son, and for the purpose of canying into eftect the design of Christ to save men. Compare John 14 : 16, 26. CHAPTER VIII. 85 10 Spirit of Christ, he is none of his. And if Christ he in you, the body is dead because of sin ; but the spirit is life because of righteousness. But if the Spirit of him that raised up Jesus from the dead dwell in you, he that raised up Christ from the dead shall also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit that dwelleth in you. Therefore, brethren, ye are debtors, not to the flesh, to live after the flesh. For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die : but if ye thi'ough the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the 11 15 : 26, 16:7. As the apostle was thinking of believers in Christ he natu- rally spoke of the Spirit as being specially the Spirit of Christ ; just as with another shade of thought he might have said, If any man have not the Spirit of God he is none of God's people. 10. Some blissful results of hav- ing the Spirit and of being under his influence are next stated. If Christ be in you; Christ, by the agency of his Spirit. Compare John 14 : -16, 17, with verse 23. || The body is dead, etc. ; the body does, indeed, re- main subject to death on account of sin, agreeably to the threatening, Thou shalt surely die. Gen. 2:17, and to the doom. Dust thou art and unto dust shalt thou return. Gen. 3:19; yet the soul on account of righteous- ness which, through Christ, has begun to rule in it, has true life towards God and will have eternal life. — Though Christ has procured life for the believer, yet it is the righteous will of God that the believer should, in his body, still be the prey of death. So far as the threat related to the body, it is unrevoked ; so far as it related to the soul, it is reversed : true life is given and will endm-e forever. 11. Still further: Though the bodies of believers must yield to death, yet they too are to be rescued from its power ; their bodies shall be recovered to life by virtue of the Spirit which dwells in believers and which is preparing them for the end- less life of heaven. He that raised up Christ from the dead shall also qmcken, 8 etc. ; God who raised up the dead body of Chi-ist will also make alive again your mortal bodies by his Spirit, that is, by virtue of his Spirit, that dwells in you. Not that the Holy Spirit raises the dead body to life : this act is ascribed to the Son of God ; John 5 : 21, 25, 28 ; but, by virtue of the Spirit's dwelling in believers and rescuing their souls from sin and spiritual death, thus preparing them for heaven, their bodies Avill also, as an appropriate result, be delivered from the dominion of death. 12-17. The obligations of believ- ers for the bestowal of the Holy Spirit are now hinted, and the glori- ous state to which the disciples of Christ will be exalted. 12. Therefore ye are debtors, etc. ; ye are under obligations, not to the fleshy to live according to its dictates ; but to the Spirit, to live according to liis guidance. 13. The sure results of obeying the flesh and of obeying the Spirit enhance this obligation : in the one case, death ; in the other, eternal life. Compare 6 : 23. If ye — mortify the deeds of the body ; if ye put to death, that is, resist and subdue, the evil de- sires of tlie carnal nature, so that they shall not have power to sway you. Such resistance can be effected only through the Spirit. — Deeds of the body is an expression of the same import as works ofthejtesh in Gal. 5 : 19-21. Compare also Col. 3: 5-10. || Ye shall live ; ye shall have eternal life. Such resistance to sinful propensities, as is here spoken of, shows alsc that spiritual life is commenced smd such 86 ROMANS. 14 body, ye shall live. For as many as are led by the Spirit 15 of God, they are the sons of God. For ye have not re- ceived the spirit of bondage again to fear ; but ye have re- ceived the spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. 16 The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are 17 the children of God : and if children, then heirs; heirs of God and joint-heirs with Christ ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together. life secures a living sense of the fa- vor of God. Compare Gal. 6 : 7, 8. 14. For as many as, etc. The cer- tainty of eternal life to those who, through the Spirit, subdue carnal in- clination, is grounded on the fact that such persons are sons of God. They have a moral likeness to God, being born of the Spirit and led by him. Compare John 1 : 12, 13. 1.5. For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear. Ye •uere once in bondage to sin ; but the spirit which you have now received is not a servile one, harassing you again Avith fear of God's condemna- tion. II But ye have received the spirit of adoption, etc. ; the filial spirit, in which we cry out to God, in our prayers, with fervency of atiection and filial confidence. || Alia, Father. These two words have the same meaning, the fonner being essen- tially Hebrew. The two-fold form of address to God, as a Father, indi- cates intensity of desii-e for needed spiritual blessings, coupled with de- light in God and filial trust in him. See Gal. 4:6. 16. The Spirit itself beareth ivit- ness, etc. The Holy Spirit, dwelling in us and exciting childlike feelings towards God, testifies, in union Avith our own spirit as being conscious of this childlike temper, that we are children of God. A two-fold testi- mony is thus borne to our being chil- dren of God : that of our OAvn con- sciousness of filial feelings towards God, and that of the Holy Spirit Avho imparted to us, and Avho still cher- ishes, this temper. The filial temper we had not formerly, but rather, being in bondage to sin, we habitually dis- obeyed God and felt a dread of his wrath and, consequently, had no filial feelings towards him. The Holy Spirit, Avho bestows on us the filial temper, also cherishes it, calling forth and directing childlike affections, verse 26, so that at times we cannot but acknowledge an agency superior to our oAvn, by Avhich, in religious affections, we are even carried beyond ourselves : by the Spirit's co-operat- ing Avith, and strengthening, the filial temper, he may Avell be considered as bearing a testimony additional to that of the rencAved mind. 17. The blissful consequences of the filial relation to God are suggested. IfchUdren, then heirs. A child is also an heir, and, as such, is to share in his father's Avealth. So Avith children of God ; they are heirs of God, Gal. 4 : 7 ; God designs to bestOAv on them a possession hereafter, suitable to his and their mutual relation. The inexhaustible resources of the divine bounty Avill most amply pro- vide for them. || Joint-heirs with Christ, etc. As they are in Christ, intimately united to him, belonging to him as his redeemed people, mem- bers of his body, Eph. 5 : 30, tliey are to be his felloAv-hcirs ; in order that, since they suffer Avith him and for his sake, they may also be glori- fied together Avith him, participating in his glory as avcU as in his suffer- ings.— ^ The AA'hole life of Christ on earth Avas a continued humiliation ; he endured temptations from the evil One, and from men contumely and rejection : Avithout earthly resources, he was dependent on the bounty of CHAPTER VIII. 87 18 For I reckon, that the sufferings of this present time are others ; during his closing days he underwent incomparable sufferings till he expired, in anguish and ig- nominy, on the cross. His people have often been called to bitter suffer- ings in consequence of being his dis- ciples and of steadfastly adhering to his cause ; they have been hated, re- viled, persecuted even unto death. The apostle had large experience of suffering for the sake of Christ ; 2 Cor. 1 : 8, 9. 4 : 8-10. 6 : 4, 5. 11 : 23-27. 12 : 10. Col. 1 : 24. But tlie issue will make amends for all sufferings endured in his cause ; for the design of God is, that his dis- ciples shall be also glorified togetha- with him. In his glory, they are to participate. He has been their suffer- ing Head ; he is now their glorified Head : they have been his suffering members ; they are to be his gloritied members. Great and unspeakable as is the glory awarded to Christ, his disciples are to share in it. See John 17 : 22-24. Compare 1 Pet. 4: 13. Rev. 3: 21. 18-23. The thought of the glory which is in reserve for the people of Christ, as being children of God, brings fully before the apostle's mind the consummation of God's purposes in respect to the kingdom of Christ and the corresponding renovation of all things. So great will be the glory to which the children of God will then be elevated, that all present suf- ferings can bear no comparison with it. So desirable is their entrance on the expected glory, that the whole creation is conceived of as anticipat- ing it with eagerness, hoping that then the suffering and perishable state to which it has been su!)jected will be succeeded by one of freedom from frailty and mortality ; a state of the natural creation corresponding to that which the glorified children of God will enjoy. As the sinfulness of men is now accompanied with misery on the part of all sentient beings in the world, so the future glory of Christ's people, when entered on by them as redeemed from sin, is to introduce a new order of things, from which decay and mortality will be excluded, and in which permanent bliss will be enjoyed. The apostle and his fellow Chi-istians, having by the presence of the Spirit iii their hearts the commencement of spiritual and eternal bliss, Vt^ere also themselves waiting with earnest desire for its consummation in the expected glory. The passage is highly figurative. Nature, or the whole creation, is per- sonified, and is represented as con- scious of having been subjected to a frail and unsatisfying state, to misery and death, yet with hope of recovery from that state and of a permanently happy condition at the period when the designs of redeeming mei'cy should be accomplished in the en- trance of Christ's people on their final glory. Tlic general idea of the termination of frailty and corruptible- ness is conveyed ; but precisely in Avhat particulars this new state of things will consist Ave are not in- ormed, and it is useless to speculate on tlie subject. The glowing descrip- tion in this passage is summarily given by the apostle Peter when he speaks, 2 Pet. 3 : 13, of " new heavens and a new earth : " a resemblance to it we have, also, in the 21st chapter of Revelation. The expectation of a renovated state of things, in which even the inferior creation should share, originated, probably, in such predictions as we find in Is. 11 : 6-9. 65: 17-25. That state how- ever, denominated the new heavens and the new earth, being so different from the one with which we are now familiar, all speculations about it and attempts at minute explanation must prove failures : but that the present is to pass away and to be succeeded by one of unspeakable glory to the redeemed people of Christ, and of 88 ROMANS. not worthy to he compared with the glory which shall be 19 revealed in us. For the earnest expectation of the creature 20 waiteth for the manifestation of the sons of God. For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by 21 reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope ; because the creature itself also shall be delivered from the bondage of corruption into the glorious liberty of the children of wide-spreading influence and connec- tions beyond our definite knowledge, seems, evidently, the teaching of the scriptures. In harmony with the lan- guage of this paragraph we may say, in the language of one of our hymns, all "nature sighs to be renewed," and is awaiting the period when the re- deemed shall enter on their promised glory ; for then frailty and mortality will have ceased, and all things will have become new. The idea is also a familiar one in the Old Testament, that under the reign of the Messiah the earth would become vastly im- proved in fruitfulness and beauty. Seels. 35: 1. 29 : 17. 32: 15, 16. 18. For I reclcon that the sufferings, etc. The apostle was animated with the thought of the glory with Christ, which was to succeed the sufferings that he and his fellow-Christians were called to endure. He may be con- sidered as saying, We may well bear patiently the sufferings, since they are to be followed by such glory ; for I judge that our present sufferings are not worthy to be named in compar- ison with the glory that is to be re- A'ealed in respect to us. Compare 2 Cor. 4: 17. 19. The earnest expectation. The word here used in the original is in- dicative of that eagerness which is shown by a person looking off to something with his head bent for- ward. II Of the creature ; moi-e cor- rectly, the creation, as per^^onified : the sentient irrational creation is figu- ratively regarded as endued with rational powers and, while exposed to abuse, suffering and death, as long- ing for that signal event which will put an (md to its misery. As other instances of this figure, see Jer. 12:4. Is. 35 : 1. II The manifestation of the sons of God; the revelation of the glory of the sons of God, mentioned in the preceding verse ; the word here trans- lated manifestation being radically the same as that translated revealed. The period is meant when the ex- pected glory shall be ushered in, and when it may also be said that the sons of God are manifested, or rendered conspicuous, as such. Comjjare 1 John 3:2. 20, 21 . This manifestation, or rev- elation, is waited for with eager in- terest by the creation, since the crea- tion is to experience a corresponding transformation. — For the creature ; more correctly, the creation. \\ Was made subject to vanity. The creation was subjected to a frail, perishable state, as if made in vain, so far as any enduring valuable purpose is concerned. || Not iciUing/y, but by reason of him, etc. The figure is still retained, which ascribes intelligence and choice to the creation. This sub- jection was not of the creation's choice, but of the sovereign appoint- ment of God. Compare Gen. 3:17, Cursed is the ground for thy sake. II In hope. These words ought, agree- ably to the punctuation in the best editions of the Greek Testament, to be connected with the Avords made subject to vanity in the first clause of the verse, as indicating the hope, held out to the creation, of deliverance from this state of frailty and transientness ; though the creation was thus sub- jected, yet hope was given it that a different state of things was in re- serve. — The words the same, in Italics, as supplied by the translators, should CHAPTEK VIII 89 22 God. For we know that the whole creation groaneth, and 23 travaileth in pain together until now : and not only tliey^ but ourselves also, which have the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting for the adop- 24 tion, to wit, the redemption of our bodv. For we are saved by hope. But hope that is seen, is not hope : for what a 25 man seeth, why doth he yet hope for ? But if we hope for 26 that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it. Like- wise the Spirit also helpeth our infirmities : for we know not be omitted, and the word it take their place. — In the 21st verse, the word because should be substituted by the word that, which word should not be separated from the word Iiope. The apostle's language in these two verses, in harmony with the suggestion just made, would be better rendered in the following manner : — For the creation was subjected to inanity (not willingly, but by reason of him who subjected it), in hope that the creation itself shall be set free from the bond- age of the corruption into the liberty of the glory of the children of God. The bondage of the corruption is the same as the involuntary subjection to vanity, coiruption being significant of that which is to decay and perish, and being virtually a bondage. The liberty, or freedom, of the glory of the children of God means liberty from that bondage, which liberty stands con- nected with the glory to be possessed by the children of God. 22. The ivhole creation groaneth, etc.; the whole creation has, up to this time, been enduring bitter an- guish. The liabilities of the lower creation to suffering seem to be here meant ; while we cannot but also think of the mental and bodily mis- eries which have so perpetually ha- rassed mankind. 23. Not only they, but ourselves also, etc. ; not only the creation in general is thus in misery and longs for de- liverance from it, but we too, that is, the apostle himself and his fellow Christians, who have the Holy Spirit as the earnest of the heavenly glory, are weighed down with a sense of present dissatisfaction and are sighing for the completed adoption, the de- liverance of our bodies from the power of death and an entrance on the full possession of our inheritance, the state of glory. Compare verses 11,17. II The first fruits of the Spirit. The first-fruits are an earnest of the coming harvest ; so the influences of the Holy Spirit, imparting the spirit of adoption, verse 14, are the earnest of the future glory, for which they are preparing the children of God by strengthening their filial aff'ection for him and maturing their conformity to his own Son. !| Waiting for the adop- tion : the full enjoyment of the bless- ings of son ship, the adoption com- pleted. II Tlie redemption of our body; the deliverance of the body from the power of death by the resurrection. See verse 1 1 . This event, still waited for, is here regarded as the last of the pi-eliminaries to the entrance of the sons of God on the full possession of their glory. 24, 25. This completed adoption is waited for ; it is still an object of hope. We are saved by hope ; more pi-operly, in hope. Salvation is not yet realized ; it is an object of hope. We have the promise of salvation, the actual and complete possession of it being in reserve. || Hope that is seen, etc. Hope ceases as soon as its object is really a matter of sight and posses- sion ; but while the desired object is not yet possessed, we continue, through patience, waiting for it. 26. Not only does our hope of 90 ROMANS. what we should pray for as we ought : but the Spirit itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be 27 uttered. And he that searcheth the hearts knoweth what is the mind of the Spirit, because he maketh intercession for the saints, according to the loill of God. 28 And we know that all things work together for good, to them that love God, to them who are the called according to 29 his purpose. For whom he did foreknow, he also did pre- destinate to he conformed to the image of his Son, that he might be the first-born among many brethren. Moreover, whom he did predestinate, them he also called ; and whom 30 salvation encourage a patient waiting for it, but the Spirit, in like manner, aids us in our weakness. Our infir- mities ; our weakness through ig- norance, error and sin. || For ice know not, etc. We need aid in our prayers ; since through ignorance Ave might pray for improper objects, and through dulness of spiritual appre- hension and affection we might not pray with the requisite confidence and earnestness. But the Spirit liim- self acts in our behalf and excites within us intense desires for spiritual blessings, felt but incapable of ex- pression. These ardent desires for spiritual good and fitness for heaven are here regarded as the entreaties of the Holy Spirit himself in our behalf, since it is he that awakens them and feeds the flame of piety. || Groan- ings lohich cannot he uttered: unuttera- ble sighings for spiritual blessings. These are, indeed, the actings of our own souls, but prompted by the Spirit, and accepted as expressions of the Spirit's desires in our be- half. — Tlie more intense our gen- uine desires for spiritual good, the less capable are they of being ade- quately expressed in language. 27. He that searcheth the hearts, etc. God, the searcher of hearts, knows our unexpressed desires and will grant them, since in them he sees the intent of the Holy Spirit in respect to us ; and the Spirit's en- treaties are in accordance with the will of God. II For the saints ; the people of Christ : so called, as being really and professedly holy persons, consecrated to God ; the counterpart of the Jews, the ancient people of God, who as a nation were called saints, or hoh/, since they were sepa- rated from ail other nations and taken into a peculiar relation to God. See on 1 : 7. — The Spirit in our hearts awakens no desires and prompts no prayers but such as the heart-search- ing God fully apprehends, and such as the prayer-hearing God will ac- knowledge as being accordant with his will. How harmonious in all their parts are the arrangements for our salvation ! and what encourage- ment we have patiently to wait for it! 28. In addition to patience in hoping for salvation, and to the spe- cial aid of the Spirit in our prayers, we know that all things work together for good to those who love God, those whom he has also called to the blessings and glory of the divine kingdom. — For good; for their high- est good, the good result of heavenly glory. In the divine administration, all things will either directly eon. duce, or be overruled, to this result. II Who are the called ; not merely in- vited, but so called that they have accepted the invitation. Sec on 1 : 7. II According to his purpose; ac- cording to the purpose of making them partakers of glory with Christ, 29, 30. The apostle proceeds to disclose the ground of the certainty CHAPTER YIII. ai he called, tliem he also justified : and whom he justified, them 31 he also glorified. What shall we then say to these things ? that all thingfs co-operate for good to the peoj)lc of Christ. In doing this, he commences with tlie fact that God foreknew them as those who were in- cluded in his purpose ; then, that he had fore-appointed them to become partakers of a moral resemblance to his own Son ; being thus fore-ap- pointed, he called, or invited, them to the proposed blessings, which call had effect, so that they became be- lievers in his Son ; being thus called, h/Q justified them, regarded and treated them as righteous on the ground of their being united to his Son by faith in him ; and those thus justified he glorified. The last step is here men- tioned, like the others, as already taken, though it is an anticipation of what is to be realized in heaven. The apostle was here conceiving of the entire Chi-istian body as contemplated in the divine purpose ; and therefore regarded the event as cei-tain, like the preceding steps which led to it. With ardor of mind, throwing himself for- ward to the era of the final accom- plishment, he seems rather describ- ing what has taken place than what is yet future. The calling and the justifying are also future and succes- sive, m reference to the individuals included in the divine purpose Though to man the divine purpose divides itself into parts, successively realized, yet to God the purpose was always present as including all the parts : God's omniscient survey con- templates all these at once, while to man they appear only in the process of being effected and are successive both in respect to indiAuduals and to generations. — Foreknow; know be- forehand, as those whom he had pur- posed to save : reference being, doubt- less, had to God's knowledge as con- nected with his eternal purposes. Compare 1 Pet. 1 : 20, where the word fore-ordained is the translation of a woxd radically the same as the one here used in the original. || Pre- destinate ; appoint, or determine, be- forehand. The same word is here used in the original as is translated determined before in Acts 4 : 28, and ordained in 1 Cor. 2 : 7. \\ To he con- formed to the image of his Son, etc. ; to the likeness of his own Son, in reference to their affections and pur- poses, or their character : in this respect it was fore-appointed that they should become like him. Thus, he being God's own Son, and they, renewed in spirit and united to hiim by faitli, being adopted as children of God, he would be the first-boni of the spiritual brotherhood, that is, the Head of it ; for in oriental families the first-born son occupied the place of honor and power-, or lordship, in reference to the other children. — The purpose of God, then, contemplated holiness of character as indispensable to its ultimate result : unless we are, morally, like Christ, we have not evidence that we belong to the com- pany whom he acknowledges as his brethren. Mistake on this point is also forestalled by the apostle's idea, that it is those who love God that were the objects of his purpose and pre-determination. || Many brethren. The redeemed will be an innumerable multitude out of every nation and kindred. See Rev. 5:9. 7:9. II Called. The connection shows that the calling involves the idea of a cor- responding acceptance on the part of the called. ' Justified ; treated as righteous through their believing in Christ. II Glorified; admitted to glory : or, more coolly speaking, ho regarded them as heirs of gloiy, as tliose %A ho were to be glorified \vith Christ. Compare verse 17. 31. In view of these things, what shall we say ? Is there the slightest ground for doubt as to our participa- tion of glory with Christ, in whom we believe and whom we are follow- 92 ROMANS. 32 If God he for us, who can he against us ? He that spared not his own Son, but delivered him up for us all, how sha 1 33 he not with him also freely give us all things? "Who shall lay any thing to the charge of God's elect ? It is God that 34 justifieth. Who is he that condemneth ? It is Christ that died : yea rather, that is risen again ; who is even at the right hand of God, who also maketh intercession for us. 35 Who shall separate us from the love of Christ ? Shall tribu- lation or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or 36 peril, or sword? As it is written, For thy sake we are killed all the day long ; we are accounted as sheep for the slaughter. 37 Nay, in all these things we are more than conquerors, through 38 him that loved us. For I am persuaded that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor princij)aKties, nor 230wers, nor things 39 present, nor things to come, nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. ing on earth ? If God he for us, etc. God is our friend : who can harm us? 32. He that spared not his own Son. Since God has not withholden the greatest possible gift, his own Son, what things are too great for him to bestow 1 All things else are small, compared with this ; having given us this, the greatest, Avill he withhold the less ? Especially will he bestow all things which are needful for accom- plishing the object of this greatest gift. 33. Who shall lay any tiling to the charge of God's elect ? Who shall bring an accusation against those whom God has chosen and who are objects of his special favor? It is God, who has acquitted them of every charge and accepted them. Who, then, can revive a cliarge against them, or prefer a new accusation ? Who can reverse God's decision con- cerning them ? 34. Who is he that condemneth 7 Who can undertake to condemn us ? Chx-ist has died for us ; yea, rather, has been raised from the dead for us ; has been exalted to the right hand of God, and is there our patron and Advocate, entreating for us favor and aid. Who is it, then, that can con- demn us ? 35, 36. Who shall separate us from the love of Christ ? That is, from the love which Christ cherishes for us. AVhat shall induce him to cease lov- ing us ? Shall affliction, in all the diversified forms in which it may assail us, be allowed to gain power over us so as to make us deny Christ, and thus induce him to separate him- self from us and cut us olf from his love ? II Nakedness ; a comparative woi'd, meaning destitution of suitable apparel. || Suxird. The sword, an instrument of death, here signifies exposure to violent death. The apos- tle was reminded of a passage in the Old Testament, Ps. 44 : 22, expres- sive of exposure to murderous ene- mies, and wliich was but too applica ble to himself and many of the early followers of Christ. 37. Nay, etc. Far from it. So far from tliese things terminatinu' in Christ's withdrawal of his love from us, it is HE that carries us triumph- antly through the conflict. 38, 39. The apostle concludes his animating view by avowing his con- viction that absolutely notliing, not CHAPTER IX. Rejection of the Jewish people from the faTor of God, regretted, 1-5. Their rejection re- sulting, not from failure on the part of God to fulfil his word, but from his discriminat- ing between his professed and his real people, 6-13. Objection against the justice of making this discrimination, considered. 14-18- Objection against the justice of imput- ing blame, considered, 19-29. Gentiles, obtaining righteousness through faith in Christ, Jews, through refusing to believe in Christ, failing to obtain righteousness, 30-33. the most various and opposite in- fluences, shall be able to separate genuine believers from the love which God has for them and Avhich he has manifested in Christ Jesus their Lord, This love will be abiding, and its de- sign in their behalf will certainly be accomplished. — Neither death, with whatever dread it may be anticipated, or with whatever teiTors it may be connected ; nor life, with all its allure- ments ; nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, that is, nor any superhu- man powers. Compare 1 Cor. 15 : 24. Eph. 1: 21. 3: 10. 6: 12. Col. 1: 16. 2: 15. Nor things present, whether agreeable or painful, nor things to come, whether desirable or dreadful ; nor height, nor depth, noth- ing on high, in heaven, or the upper air, the visible heavens where evil spirits Avere popularly thought often to be, Eph. 2:2. 6:12, and nothing below, on earth, or under tlie earth ; (compare Is. 7 : 11, where earth and heaven seem to be meant by depdh and height ; ) nor a ny other creature, nor any created thing. In short, nothing at all shall prevail to remove from us God's loving-kindness ; it will abide, and will secure for us the end which he has purposed to bestow, namely, participation in the glory of Christ in heaven. Such is the result to which the apostle brings his reasoning on the topics of the believer's justification and sanctification by the death of Christ and the renovating agency of the Holy Spirit. In the last two verses, the ardor of his mind must be kept in view when wo are seeking to interpret his language. He accumu- lates various particulars, some of them entire contrasts, some of them capable of being applied to beings and things that might seem in them- selves helpful to Christians rather than hostile to them ; but by such an accumulation he brings out more fully, than he otherwise could, his deep conviction of the certainty of a glo- rious ssue to the believer in Christ. CHAPTERS IX — XI. Another section of the epistle com- mences at this point and occupies three chapters. The doctrine of the gospel, as unfolded in this epistle, was entirely repugnant to the senti- ments of Jews in general. They had been in the habit of regarding them- selves as the people of God, by virtue of his promises to the patriarchs and of their own obsen^ance of the Mosaic law : they held the observance of this law as a claim for acceptance with God. The apostle i-egaixled such a claim as futile : acceptance with God, he taught, is to be obtained by be- coming disciples of Christ and trust- ing in him. This utter opposition of cherished Jewish ideas to the Chris- tian doctrine made the mass of the nation reject the gospel and exclude themselves from its benefits. The apostle could not but commiserate them. Their rejection from being the people of God needed, in view of the ancient promises of God, to be explained and vindicated. To this subject the three following chapters arc devoted. (93) 94 ROMANS. 1 I SAY the truth in Chinst, I lie not, my conscience also CHAPTER IX. The apostle first expresses bis deep regret at the i-everse which had taken place in the Jewish nation ; formerly, so honored of God and favored with rich promises ; now, cast off and hav- ing no portion in the Messiah. Vs. 1-5. Having expressed his grief, he next undertakes to explain this deplorable fact. Some might hastily conclude, that God had failed to fulfil his word. Paul repels that idea ; but, resorting to the absolute pui'poses of God, af- firms that God did not make his promise to the entire nation : God discriminated between the nation and those who Avere, or were to be, his real people ; just as he discriminated, among the descendants of Abraham, between Isaac, the promised child, and the other children ; and as he made a distinction between the children of Rebecca, namely Esau and Jacob, even before they were born. Vs.6-13. Some might object that in making such discrimination according to an absolute purpose, God was unjust. The apostle repels tliis suggestion by an appeal to the Jewish scriptures, the authority and sacredness of which Jews would acknowledge. In the Old Testament, God claims to exer- cise his mercy on whom he will, thus selecting objects for his mercy, mak- ing distinctions in the bestowal of it, and not allowing it to rest on any meritorious ground, such, for instance, as that of a person's desiring it, or toiling for it so as to deserve it, but purely on the ground of God's being disposed to be merciful. So, on the other hand, if mercy be withheld and a man's heait become hardened, the Old Testament traces this result to God. A person, then, who re- gai'ded the Old Testament as an au- thority, could not consistently reject the thought that God made discrimi- nation among the Jca^s, showing mercy to some and hardening others. Vs. 14-18. The objector might then say, Wliy does he then blame us ? for in any event his will is done ; no one has effectually opposed it. — The apostle regards this as the language of im- piety. He suggests two replies to it : first, God has a right to do as he pleases with his creatures, designing them respectively for honor or for dis- honor ; secondly. In bringing about the result of his pui-pose, he awards men to an issue for wliich they have become fitted, whether, as objects of his displeasure, for destruction, or, as objects of his favor, for glory. Tliis is true of men, whether they are Jews or Gentiles, as Gentiles and Jews were both found among Christians. The apostle here quotes, in illustra- tion of his views, a passage from the prophet Hosea which represents God as, of his mere good pleasure, taking into a relation of favor with himself those who had not hitherto been tlius regarded, a thought applicable to Gentiles, and from the prophet Isaiah language which showed that a vast number of Jews would be cast off". Vs. 19-29. It accords with these views, then, that Gentiles, who had not been pur- suing after righteousness, had yet ob- tained righteousness, namely, that which comes from believing in Christ; and that Jews, who had been pursu- ing after righteousness had not ob- tained it, because they sought it not from faitli in Christ, but from adher- ing to the Mosaic law. Vs. 30-33. The cause of the Jews' exclusion from the fovor of God and from being liis people is, thus, clearly shown ; namely, their refusing to believe in Christ. 1 / say the truth in Christ, 1 lie not, etc.; a solemn avowal of the apo-ilc's sincerity in the affirmation he was about to make. He spoke as one united to Christ and resting all his CHAPTER IX. 95 2 bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost, that I have great 3 heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart. For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ, for my brethren, 4 my kinsmen according to the flesh : who are Israelites : to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the cove- hopes of spiritual good on him, feel- ing that, if he should make a false declaration, his conduct would be a forfeiting of his relationship to Christ. He spoke, also, as one under the in- fluence of the Holy Spii'it, and hav- ing the testimony of his own con- science that he was about to utter only the truth. 2. That I have great heaviness, etc. The ground of his sorrow, namely, God's rejection of the Jewish people, he does not fonnally state, perhaps, through dt^icacy towards the Jews ; but it wouli be easily conjectured and would soon appear. 3. For I could icish, etc. Under his intensity of emotion in view of the hopeless reverse to which the Jews were subjecting themselves, he expresses a willingness to endure any conceivable misery, however extreme, even to being himself sundered from Christ and devoted to destruction, were it possible thereby to save them from their doom. — This passage is not to be regarded as proceeding from a cool, calculating mind, but as the language of emotion, showing the deep hold which the welfare of his countrymen had on his heart and how little he ought to be suspected of in- difference towards them. His wil- lingness to meet such suffering must also be understood as conditioned on the possibility of its being so ap- pointed, and of its being available for the purpose contemplated. It should be compared with expressions of so- licitude and compassion which are sometimes made in reference to an endeared object ; as when we say, We would gladly have done ainj thing, or endured any thing, to avert its misery: as David said, 2 Sam. 18 : 33, Would God I had died for thee, O Absalom, my son, my son; that is, pro- vided my dving could have saved thy life ; as Moses said, Ex. 32 : 32, Yet now, if thou wilt, forgive their sin ; and if not, blot me, I pray thee, out of thy book which thou hast written ; that is, provided that thus the people might be saved. — The original Avord, translated / could in'sh, may be com- pared with similar Avords in the origi- nal, as to their grammatical forai, in Acts 25 : 22. "Gal. 4 : 20. i| Ac- cxirsed from Christ. The word anathe- ma, here used in the original, signifies something which has been devoted to destmction and which could not be redeemed. Compare Lev. 27 : 28, 29. The con-esponding Hebrew term was also employed in such cases as those of the ancient cities of Pales- tine, and of various objects, taken as spoils of war, that were to be de- stroyed. See Josh. 6 : 17, 18. 7 : 1, 11. To be an anathema, accursed, was, to he given up to destruction. In the earnest expression of his grief, then, the apostle declares himself ready, in behalf of his national kin- dred, to endure the very worst con- ceivable form of misery, even a sep- aration from Christ and meeting the doom of an accursed object, could such an airangement avail to the sal- vation of his countrymen. In such emotion, he v ould naturally name something beyond possibility; since any thing within his reach, any thing really feasible, could not fathom the depth of his grief at their loss of the inconceivable good of the Messiah's kingdom. 1| For my brethren, etc.; in behalf of my brethren, the Jews, my kinsmen as to national descent and national relation. 4. The apostle proceeds to men- tion the chief points by which the 96 ROMANS. nants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises ; whose are the fathers, and of whom, as con- cerning the flesh, Christ came ; who is over all, God BLESSED FOREVER ! Amen. Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. Jewish nation had been pre-eminently distinguished, and reflection on which CDuld not but stimulate interest in their welfare. — Who are Israelites. They bore the honorable name of Israelites (compare 2 Cor. 11 : 22), as descended from the patriarch to whom the appellation Israel was given by the angel of God, Gen. 32 : 24-28, as an indication of divine favor to- wards him. II To whom pertaineth the adoption ; more exactly, ichose was the adoption. The adoption here spoken of is not the spiritual adoption, men- tioned in 8 : 15-17, but the national, by which the Hebrews were honored in being selected from all other na- tions to be the people, or children, of God. See Dent. 14: 1. 32 : 6. II The glory ; the Aasible manifestation of Jehovah's presence in the taber- nacle and temple. See Ex. 40 : 34, 35. 1 Kgs. 8 : 10, 11. 2 Chron. 7 : 1. Compare also Ex. 24: 16, 17. II The covenants; those made with Abraham, Jacob, and the whole peo- ple. II The giving of the law ; the code, or system, of laws expressly given from heaven through Moses. II The service of God; the divinely appointed worship. 1| The promises; particularly those pertaining to the coming and the reign of the Messiah. 5. Whose are the fathers ; the pa- triarchs, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and other honored progenitors of the Jew- ish nation. II Of whom, as concerning the flesh, Christ came. As to his fleshly, human, descent, the Messiah, in whom the gloiy and hopes of the nation and of the'world centred, was of the Jewish peo])le. — He possessed, however, a higher nature than the human, in which he was in no respect connected, for his existence, with any created being. This divine nature is immediately brought to our notice in contrast with the human. || Who is God. The mention of the human descent of Christ, in such a connec- tion as this, where the pri^nleges and glory of the Jewish nation are exhib- ited, naturally led to a declaration of his divine nature and of the apostle's feelings of adoration towards him. For a similar mention of his divine nature, see 1 : 4. John 1:1. 1 Tim. 3 : 16. II Over all; over all men without distinction of nations as being Gentiles or Jews, and over all things. See Matt. 28: 18. Acts 10: 36. Eph. 1 : 22. Hcb. 1:2. 1 Pet. 3 : 22. II Blessed forever ; worthy to bo praised forcA'er. — T])C words, who is over all, God blessed forever, have been variously interpreted. The principal of these diverse modes of treating them is that which regards them as, in the oiiginal, not referring to Christ, but as a doxology addressed to God. The objections, howe\'er, against this view arc so strong that it is best to understand the words as relating di- rectly to Christ. 6. Having so feelingly avowed his soiTOw, the apostle proceeds to ac- count for the sad event of the Jews' rejection. Some might regard it as a failure, on the part of Gocl, to fulfil his promise to the seed of Abraham. Such a view, however, the apostle afiirms, is not correct : for God's promise had respect not to all the Jews, but to a certain portion of them whom in his own free purpose he had designed to bless. To that portion, originally had in view, the promise had been, or would be, fulfilled. The promise was made to the Israelites ; but not all who have descended from Israel are acknowledged as true Is- raelites : the promise was made to the CHAPTER IX. 97 9 10 For tliey are not all Israel, which are of Israel : neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all chil- dren : but, In Isaac shall th j seed be called : that is. They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God ; but the children of the promise are counted for the seed. For this is the -word of promise. At this time will I come, and Sarah shall have a son. And not only this; children of Abraham ; but not all the descendants of Abraham are acknowl- edged as his true children : just as in a national point of view, it was only the descendants of Abraham through Isaac that were regarded as Abraham's children. — Not as though the icord of God, etc. The case is not as though the declaration of God, or his word of promise, had failed : we are not to reason on any such ground. || For they are not all Israel, etc. ; for not all who are descendants of Israel are the true Israel, Israelites in the sight of God. 7. Neither because they are the seed of Abraham, etc. Not because they are natural descendants of Abraham, are they his true children, having part in the promises made to him. II But, in Isaac, etc. Though Abra- ham had other sons, yet only his de- scendants through Isaac were to be accounted his posterity. See Gen. 21 : 12. — The same thing is obsei-va- ble in regard to the possession of spir- itual blessings, as held true in regard to being accounted the posterity of Abraham. It was only the descend- ants through Isaac that were to be regarded as his seed, while the de- scendants through Ishmael were not accounted his posterity in reference to the blessings which were promised to Abraham ; those descendants were not included in the divine promises. As a distinction was made among the immediate descendants of Abraham, and only a certain portion were in- cluded within the promises, so, in regard to the nation, a distinction was made. It was not the natural relation to Abraham that was the ground of receiving the blessings of the Mes- 9 siah : not the descendants of Abra- ham, as such, were to inherit the promises ; fleshly claims did not hold here, and blessings were bestowed on a different principle. The particular principle which the apostle had in mind is presented in the following verse. 8. That is, etc. The apostle re- gards the promise which he had just quoted. Gen. 21 : 12, as containing the idea, that not those who are de- scended from Abraham by natural birth arc acknowledged as children of God, but those to whom the prom- ise of God particularly related, and who are therefore denominated chil- dren of the promise. Tlie tnie children of God are not those persons who trace their natural descent to Abra- ham, but those who were the objects of God's promise, or, agreeably to verse 11, objects of God's purpose. Sonship with God is not a result of fleshly descent, but of God's prom- ise, or purpose. 9. For this is the word of promise, etc. This verse contains the proof that only those are regarded as chil- dren of God, in respect to whom a promise had been made ; just as only Isaac, of all the sons of Abraham, was regarded as his tiiie child, or heir, in consequence of his being bom by virtue of a divine promise. — The promise, as here cited, is not a verbal, but a free, quotation, according to the sense, from Gen. 18 : 10. 10-13. And not only this ; but, etc. Rebecca also is a case in point. — ^As further illustrating the bestowal of blessings in accordance with a di- vine promise, or purpose, aside from the circumstance of biith, the apostle 98 ROMANS but when Rebecca also had conceived by one, even by oui 11 father Isaac, (for the children being not yet born, neither hav- ing done any good or evil, that the purpose of God accord- ing to election might stand, not of works, but of him that 12 calleth;) it was said unto her, The elder shall serve the 13 younger : as it is written, Jacob have I loved, but Esau have I hated adduces the case of Kebecca, the motlier of Esau and Jacob. Con- cerning her two sons respectively, God had declared his purpose even before they were born and Avhen, moreover, that purpose could not be influenced by either good desert or ill desert on their part ; and thus the superior privileges and blessings of Jacob must be traced to a divine pur- pose or promise, not to the circum- stance of descent from Abraham, nor to a claim founded on meritorious obedience. God discriminated, in his purpose, between these two sons, giv- ing one pre-eminence over the other, and giving the pre-eminence to that one who, on tlie principle of domestic relations acknowledged at that time, could not have expected it. 11. That the purpose of God ac- cording to election might stand; accord- ing to his own spontaneous choice be- tween those two sons of Rebecca; a choice, originating in his own mind, not influenced by any thing extraneous to himself || Not of works ; originat- ing, not from any works performed, or obedience rendered. This choice was not a result of deeds on the part of the children, either good deeds or evil, and therefore not a result of desert, but a result of God's own calling and appointment. — A universal principle as to the freeness of God's choice seems here involved : this choice rests not at all on good desert, either pre- sent, or future as foreseen. 12. It was said unto her, etc. See Gen. 25 : 23. It was the rule in oriental families that the first-born son should have authority over the others ; but in the case of Esau and Jacob, God saw fit to disregard the rule and to purpose that the older should be in subjection to the younger, thus making an unexpected disci'im- ination as to superiority. This case illustrated not only the limitation of blessings to one in preference to another of Abraham's descendants, but also an antecedent choice of the former, according to a divine purpose as the ground of this limitation. — The passage quoted had reference origin- ally to the posterity of Esau and Jacob, thougli it doubtless applied also to the two brothers personally; and in either case, it equally answered the apostle's design ; since tlie relative position of the two brothers, and of the people descended from them, was a result of the divine jn-e-arrange- ment. The idea of the elder being a servant to the younger had reference to the inferior position, to Avhich Esau was reduced by his loss of his father's blessing and of the right of primo- geniture, and by his being separated from the family which enjoyed a spe- cial relation to Gocl. — In reference to the descendants of the two brothers,- the Old Testament proves the fulfil- ment of the divine purpose in the re- peated subjection of the Edomites, descendants of Esau, to the Hebrews. See 1 Sam. 14 : 47. 2 Sam. 8 : 14. 1 Chron. 18: 11-13. 1 Kgs. 11: 15. 13. As it is written, etc. In har- mony with the view just given of a discrimination, in the purpose of God, between Esau and Jacob, we find it written in Mai. 1 : 2, 3, I loved Jacob and I hated Esau. — The sub- sequent treatment of these individuals and of their posterity was in harmony with the declaration made before their birth : Jacob and his descendants chaptp:r IX. 99 14 "What shall we say then ? is there unrighteousness with 15 God ? God forbid. For he saith to Moses, I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy, and I will have compas- 16 sion on whom I will have compassion. So then, it is not of him that willeth, nor him that runneth, but of God that were favored of God, while Esau and his descendants Avere comparatively neglected : God, according to his own purpose, in the one case, bestowed fa- vor, in the other he did not. — In the quotation from Malachi, the two na- tions, the Hebrews and the Edomites, are spoken of; but the apostle easily associated the nations respectively with their progenitors, and may be considered as directing attention to the resemblance between historical events in the tv.o nations and the original pi-ediction. — The word hated is here to be understood comparatively, as in Luke 14 : 26 ; and it indicates the comparative lack of favor tOAvards Esau. — Throughout this pai-agraph, vs. 8-13, the apostle eA'idently traces back human affairs to the pre-deter- mining Avill of God, and to his provi- dential administration as correspond- ing Avith that AA'ill. This recognition of the sovereign purpose and agency of God is frequent Avith Paul. Com- pare 2 Cor. 5 : 18. Eph. 1:11. 2 : 8, 9. 2 Tim. 1 : 8, 9. 14. What shall tve say then ? Is there unrighteousness, etc. If God, in his treatment of men, discriminate be- tAA'een them according to an original purpose of his OAvn, Avhat shall we say to this ? Is he unrighteous in so doing 1 — The apostle, forestalhng the thought that thereby the justice of God might be impugned, himself proposes the inquiry, AA'hether there be injustice in God's treating men according to his own original spon- taneous purpose in regard to them. II God forbid ; be it not so : let not such a thought be indulged. 1.0. For he saith to Moses. The apostle now repels the idea that there can be injustice on the part of God. In order to perceive the force of his reply, Ave must keep in mind the actual case Avhich he is considering ; namely, the rejection of the Jews. He is not to be regarded as discussing, in a philosophical manner, an abstract question concerning the government of God, but an actual case and in a manner adapted to the JcAvish mind. The JcAvs held the Old Testament in reverence as the Avord of God ; and if it should appear that God had claim- ed, in his Avord, the right of discrim- inating betAveen men according to his own soA-ereign will and purpose, tlie supposition of unrighteousness in him must, by Jcavs, be abandoned. This claim, together Avith correspond- ing conduct, on the part of God, is clearly maintained in the Old Testa- ment. This appeal to the Avord of God is of two parts ; the first, in reference to the bestoAval of mercy : the second, in respect to the award of A'engeance. In a declaration to Moses, Ex. 3.3 : 19, God claims the right to shoAV mercy on AA^homsoever he will, having supreme regard to his OAvn good pleasure. 16. So then, etc. Erom the de- claration of God just quoted, it fol- loAvs that the bestOAval of his mercy is to be traced to his oavu avIU or choice, and not to a person's own desire, or strenuous efforts to deserve it, II It is not of^ him that willeth ; the mercy of God is not a result of a person's oavu will, or desire for it, as the originating, or procuring, cause. II Nor of him that runneth. Allusion is here had to the races in which men contended for prizes, 1 Cor. 9 : 24 ; the prize Avas aAvarded, as a matter of mei-it, to the successful racer. Not so in regard to the mercy of God : it is not bestovA'cd as a compensation for serA'ice, or for efforts, as if man could 100 ROMANS. 17 18 slioweth mercy. For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh ; Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might show my power in thee, and that my name might be declai-ed throughout all the earth. Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth. obtain a claim to it, as he can for an earthly prize, which is awarded on the ground of the successful compet- itor's deserving it. — The apostle is here contemplating the source of bless- ings : he traces them back to the divine will ; he does not deny the necessity, nor disparage the duty, of desires and efforts for blessings. Nothing is more evident, both from the word of God and from universal experience, than that sincere and ear- nest seeking for blessings is requisite in order to then- bestowal : he that asketh receiveth ; he that seeketh find- eth ; to him that knocketh it shall be opened. But the apostle here denies the meritorious character of such de- sires and efforts, as if they could con- stitute a claim for the blessings. Not to man's desert, but to God's will and unmerited mercy, must blessings be traced. The apostle viewed the plan of God in redemption as comprehend- ing the entire human family, not merely Jews ; and the divine purpose of forming subjects for the spiritual kingdom, of which the Messiah was to be the head, was by no means limited to the Jewish people. He also viewed God as acting from the tirst, when he selected Abraham and the Jewish nation, with reference to that kingdom in its completed state. In explaining the divine dealings •vvith the Jews, therefore, he resorts to that governing purpose of God, by which God selects and fits subjects of his kingdom, not according to natural