IHraS i h ftStt|UV] 'A. «•> -' '*' ' THOUGHTS on the Surging of PsaIms and Anthems IN churches ■ R-*i3M*i rr-.>^>r_i Sol af^&EaXBSrTai fiwRHr H SiHH^^^n^ ^Om^S H fs$ W* FROM THE LIBRARY OF REV. LOUIS FITZGERALD BENSON. D. D. BEQUEATHED BY HIM TO THE LIBRARY OF PRINCETON THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY THOUGHTS ON THE SINGING OF PSALMS AND ANTHEMS IN CHURCHES. THOUGHTS ON THE SINGING OF PSALMS AND ANTHEMS IN CHURCHES. THE author of the following remarks thinks proper to begin them with the demand of there being conceded to him, that the exciting and the increasing of devout affections, is the only reason which can be given for the enlivening of the devo- tions of the Church with the charms of Poetry, and with those of Music. Let the reader pause at this place, and frame in his own mind, either a denial or an acknowledgement of what has just now been affirmed to be the reason — the only reason of sing- ing in religious assemblies. If he deny this, he had best lay down this essay, it being not designed for him. If he ac- knowledge the principle, there is asked of him no more than to admit whatever shall be fairly inferred from it. Perhaps, however, the assuming of such premises may seem uncharitable ; and it may be supposed impossible, that any should plead for another object than that stated. But it is not impossible, and the caution cannot be uncharitable ; because there is occasionally heard the plea of mere gratification or amusement, and that by persons who would reject the imputa- tion of designed indecorum ; and who would contend for the matter, as an expedient to bring people together for their edifi- cation. O deplorable insensibility to the sanctity of the place ! as if the mixingof edification with amusement were cither con- sistent with the professed design, under which it was set apart, or likely to be subservient to the duties to which it is apnropri- 2 Singing of Psalms and Anthems, ated! If amusement, however innocent, were admissible, there might be mentioned many kinds of such amusement, which would tend more powerfully to the effect. They would also* be less exceptionable than the singing of mock praises ; for such are words of praise not intended to occupy the mind; and especially when accompanied by notes, calculated to efface any serious impression which may have been produced by a better exercise. We read in scripture, that St. Paul, after having given instructions relative to the due performance of divine service, represents as a probable consequence of practis- ing what he had prescribed, that an unbeliever, on being pre- sent, would fall down and worship. Will the advocate for amusement anticipate such an effect, or think it at all probable? Or rather, is it not much more probable, and has it not hap- pened, that while the unbeliever has been varying the motions of his limbs and of his fingers to the airs of the merry music, seriousChristians*have gone off from it with sorrow and disgust? It is not uncommon to meet with persons who have abandoned our communion, on the avowed principle, that they observed in it too little of seriousness and too much of levity. It is easy to answer such a mistaken reason of separation, so long as our service is what it ought to be. But the same is not easy when levity is encouraged and seriousness made to give way to amusement, in the very ordering of the service. Let it not be objected, that the allowed end of sacred music is accomplished through the medium of the pleasing emotions Which it excites. This must be acknowledged ; but a distinc- tion is to be taken between the making of devotion pleasing by the aid of music, and the applying of music to convey a plea- sure not intended to be instrumental to devotion. It is this which is here reprobated as unseasonable, and indeed profane. There was a necessity to combat this error ; not only be- cause it has been explicitly avowed, but because its influ- ence has been perceivable in most of the abuses to be deplo- red : and it may be proper now to apply to these the principle which was set out with ; dividing the subject into two branch- es, that of Anthems, and that of Psaxms. By Anthems, are meant passages of Holy Scripture, se- lected with a view to their being sung in an higher species of music than that of common psalmody ; this being the meaning ; <>l Psalmi and Anthems, oi'tUe word as banded down to us by the Church of England. If we extend it to other compositi >ns, and admit them, il violation of the Rubrics of our Church ; and as the practice is irregular, so the bad consequences of it arc obvious. If any one Minister have a right to introduce into bis Church, a poetical composition worth} of the occasion. yet not sanctioned I))' the Episcopal Church, every minister of a parish mav do the same; and being equally left to his discretion, he may require his con- gregation to sing out of some insipid lmnn book. In such a case, it would be inconsistent to censure him, unless indeed on account of some false doctrine introduced. But he may avoid this, and yet burthen the people with effusions which arc lit- tle of a piece with the rational worship of our Church. Next it should be observed of anthems, that they and the music to accompany them should be selected by skilful persons, and not left to the discretion of the performers. In the fine arts of Poetry, Painting, and Music, we meet with inamora- tos, who become extravagantly fond each of his favourite art, without discovering any tolerable measure of taste or genius in that with which he is so much delighted. But to be at con- siderable pains to accomplish an extraordinary musical exhi- bition in our churches, and then to hear of persons of known taste, that they turn from it in disgust, is humiliating in the extreme. This, however, has sometimes happened in rela- tion both to the words and music. In regard to the former, there have been known sentences strung together, not only without any connection of sense, but in contrariety to both sense and grammar. Another maxim should be the requiring of the singers to he masters of their respective parts before they perform in the presenceof the congregation: some acknowledged judge pledg- ing his opinion that they are qualified. The proposal of ma- king the church asinging school, during the time appropriated for worship, is too shameful to be ever brought forward in form ; and yet the principle has been practised on very often, to tin' great dissatisfaction of congregations ; and, it is to be hoped, with errcat self-reproach in the minds of Ministers for not having interfered with more authority in the way of pre- vention. Under this head it may be proper to insert the rcquir- ingof every performer to keep himself within proper bounds. 4 Singing of Psalms and Anthems. as to the elevation of his voice. Every one knows that the designed effect of the music can be produced no otherwise than by a judicious combination. But some vain young man — for what but vanity can be the cause — imagines that his voice is entitled to be heard above the voices of his companions. To any ear even tolerably correct, this would spoil the finest mu- sic ever heard. What then is to be the consequence ? shall such a coxcomb be endured, or shall he be affronted? If the former, how inconsistent is it to demand credit for a perfor- mance, as an improvement of the service, although evidently a debasement of it ! The latter part of the alternative is in- deed disagreeable ; but as experience shows that this is inse- parably attached to the projected improvement, the latter should not be attempted without there being some persons who will undertake to prevent or to remedy the abuse. Next to proper singing, there may be mentioned proper be- haviour, in decorum suited to the place and the occasion. Among the young men admitted to our orchestras, there have been many instances of gross levity. Of this scandalous abuse there have been many mourning witnesses. We may be as- sured, that the endurance of it has a fendency to injure our Church, in a degree for which no singing can be a recompense. To accomplish a suitable carriage in the Church, among all the members of it in their respective pews, must be a difficult task, however worthy of being attempted. Although indeco- rum should be suppressed, it must rise to a certain height be- fore interference can be justifiable. And even if palpable in- decorum should be overlooked, the disgusted observer, if rea- sonable, will make allowance for a natural backwardness to the disagreeable office of rebuke in public, and will not take for granted, that either the Clergy or the lay gentlemen in autho- rity are indifferent to the prostitution of the place, and the in- sult offered to the service. But for the winking at indecorum in a part of the Church under their immediate inspection, and entirely at their command, no such allowance is due ; neither is there a probability of its being made. On the contrary, it is most likely that a disparaging opinion is formed of the religious characters of those who are indifferent, or supposed to be indifferent to so great an evil. When it has happened, and, it is confessed with pleasure, to Sinking of Psal»ir, and Anthems. 5 have happened* though seldom, thai the anthem, that the mu- sic, and that the performance has been what good sens.-, what good taste, and what good manners dictate, the exhibition must have afforded an high gratification to very many ; and it is difficult to perceive on what ground any person can have reasonably taken offence, unless on that of the words being unknown to the congregation* Thifl might he prevented, hy authorising select anthems to he printed, and sold at the price of a few cents per copy. A sheet of paper would hold as many as any Church can have occasion for. Still, however, let it he remembered, that the selection should be confined to passages of Scripture ; for any thing further would be con- trary to the Rubrics. Before the leaving of the pnocont i.ranoh of the aubject, it may be proper to mention, that the abuses stated under it are all of such a nature as more than disappoint any benefit or religious gratification to be expected ; and that, accordingly, no excuses, grounded on the difficulty of guarding against the abuses, are to be admitted. Such excuses prove, if any thing, much more than is attended by them, even that the exercise in question should not be attempted. The other branch of the subject is common Psalmody. There has been sometimes, although seldom, the opinion ex- pressed, that all promiscuous singing had better be suppress- ed, on account of the discordance of the voices. From this opinion the author of the present essay dissents ; and he will therefore express the sentiments which occur to him con- cerning the advantages and incident disadvantages. In regard to the former, it will not be denied that the taking of the praises of God on the tongue has a tendency to interest the heart : and surely this rs a sufficient reason for condescend- ing to that simpler and easier music, which can be joined in by the generality of the people. And then, the effect which would he produced on almost any mind from the united voices of a collective body, not accompanied by manifest absurdity, al- though in musical strains not accommodated to a fastidious ear, must be confessed a most important use. It must be evident, that such an effect will be attendant on singing of this sort, so long as the law of sympathy shall be an opera- ting principle of our constitution. Besides, promiscuous 6 Singing of Psalms and Anthems. singing existed for some ages in the Christian Church before the introduction of the other. And this is not a little in its favour : so that we should beware how we sacrifice a prac- tice of the times when piety the most abounded, for the exclusive cultivation of another practice, which was not known until piety had undergone a visible decline. As to the disadvantages of this general singing, there may be objected, that it does not advance that higher species of music which delights the practised ear. To this it is a sufficient answer, that divine worship is not instituted exclusively for those who are proficient in that art. But there is another dis- advantage, which, it must be confessed, cannot so easily be removed, and perhaps must be submitted to, in a degree. It IS that of the too loud singing of a few individuals, with dis- cordant voices ; the effect sometimes of vanity and sometimes of zeal. In relation to this it must be perceived, that where there is a general joining, the vehement or the ill-timed notes of an individual do not so easily become troublesome. But if an obstinate person should persevere in his disturbance of the congregation, he should be tenderly dealt with, but at all events made to submit. There is no danger of the diminution of a congregation from such a measure as this, properly con- ducted. On the contrary, there is much more danger of it from that mistaken delicacy, which would court or conciliate a member, by submitting to his humours, however unreasona- ble and inconvenient, which makes a membership contempti- ble by representing it as a favour done by the party. If we drive people from Church, by allowed indecorum in the per- formance, it is what we have to answer for at the bar of God. But if a man quit it, because we will not allow him to be a disturber, although we should admit him to be under a pious impulse, he is rendered, by such a trait of character, an unfit member of any social body, with whose comely order his prejudices may interfere. Even if, contrary to the opinion here expressed, it be de- sirable that general singing should give way to the more culti- vated ; yet it may be taken for granted, that sueh a change may be despaired of, on account of the general dissatisfaction it would occasion : and this is so notorious, that no proposal of it has been made, although there is nothing in our Canons Singing of Psalms and Anthems. or in our Rubrics, to interdict it. But if this part of our vice is to be continued, the more we cai improve it, the better It must also be proper to induce the people to join in it, by tnj expedients which may make it the easier to tin in ; and espe- cially by an authoritative prevention ol'any indirect expedients to prevent them. For if the sinking in question is to obtain, notwithstanding the objections on the score of taste, it ought surely to be cultivated, in defiance of the self-admiration of conceited individuals. Now, what is to be complained of under this head, is a systematic design in some places to the opposite end of difficulty and discouragement. What else can be the motive of constantly wishing* to change the tunes, as soon as they have become familiarized to the people ? Not only so, ingenuity is put to work for the accomplishment of this mischievous end. There is sometimes taken a good old tunc, which has stood the test of critical skill for many ages : a slight alteration is made, always for the worse, and a new name is given to this tune ; and the consequence is, as was, no doubt, anticipated, that the accustomed singer in his pew, re- cognizing the resemblance of his old friend, but not finding him the same, and being distracted between past custom and imaginary improvement, is hushed to silence. The expedient to be here proposed for the counteracting of these abuses, is to mark in the margin of a Prayer Book the tune which shall be thought the best suited to each psalm. Then, when any psalm is directed by the Minister, it will be known what tune is to accompany it. And this union between psalm and tune is here proposed to be inseparable : because, it harmonizes with the principle set out with : for so much are we under the government of the law of association, that where there has been often an union of words, of notes, and of feeling, the first two will scarce ever be heard, without the excitement of the last. This is a fact well known to those who influence the feelings of the people to political pur- poses, by the means of ballads. The matter is equally true of the connection between psalmody and the devotion which it ought to be our object to excite by it ; and this affords an unanswerable argument against the submitting of sacred mu- sic to the direction of those who have no desire of making it the handmaid of devotion. 8 Singing of Psalms and Anthems. Not only should the tunes be established, but they should be few, for the purpose of rendering them familiar and easy to the people. The criterion for the number should be this : Esti- mate the number of portions which may be supposed sung on Sundays, and on the principal festivals throughout the year. Take such a divisor as that the quotient shall be a number confessedly not too often to hear a good tune in the course of of a year : the divisor is the number of tunes required. Ac- cording to this standard, it would seem that no Church can want more than from a dozen to twenty tunes. But it may be said, Is all improvement in this line to be shut out ? this is not the meaning ; but it is that the introduction of a new tune should be very rare ; and then, because it is better than some old one, which should give way to it.* There are here conceived of but two sources of objection to the scheme. One is, the very improper motive of putting a stop, as much as may be, to the singing of the people. The other is, the variety in which persons delight to indulge them- selves in the exercise of a natural talent, from which they de- rive pleasure, and perhaps edification. But such persons ought to make a distinction between private gratification and public utility. If the latter is the most likely to be accomplished ; that is, if the people are the most likely to be induced to sing by a very limited though sufficient variety, this object ought to go- vern in the Church, and a more extended variety should be reserved for private houses and for select companies. They who have studied psalmody, and are much in the practice of it in private, in consequence of a peculiar aptitude for the employment, do not always consider that this cannot be ex- pected of the members of a congregation generally, who may yet join in what has been made easy to them by habit, while they will think themselves excused, from the exercise if it be made difficult to them. The supposition is still gone on, that it is desirable to allow their aid ; for, if so, the suitable means of it should be adopted. * The author is strengthened in his opinion by inspection of a small book in his possession, containing selections of psalms and tunes, purporting to be those sung in. the parish church of St. .tames, Westminster. In that church there is morning and evening service daily throughout the year, and yet the number of tunes is twenty Singing of Psalms and Jhthemi. 9 If what lias been already recommended should be steadily pursued, another evil, of which (line has been complaint, would cease of course. There is here alluded to an unsuitable junction of psalm and tune. It is evident, that a time proper for strains of praise may ill suit those which ere either plaintive or merely instructive. And what is proper for either of these may he improper for the other. This is an additional argu- ment for not leaving musical arrangement to the discretion of every performer. But, as was said, in case of arrangement on the other points, there would he no need of any here. Something must be said concerning interludes and volunta- ries. Certainly nothing contrary either to good taste or to de- cency should be tolerated, for the gratification of private whim, much less in violation of all regard to religion and to decorum. Jf the contrary to this were understood, when people are put to the expense of furnishing a church with an organ, it is pro- bable that there would be found few willing to contribute. In- deed, it seems impossible to account for the prejudices which some entertain against organs,otherwise than from an associa- tion formed in their minds of the instruments, with the recol- lection of the nuisances which they are made to serious people, by being played on improperly. In regard to interludes, a number, adjusted to the different styles of music, should be selected by some proficient. There should be noted, for the government of the performer, the different psalms to which they are respectively intended to be attached ; and there should be required of him strict regard to the limits thus marked out. The late Mr. F. Hopkinson, a gentleman of known taste, in an essay published in his works, has supposed, that what is here treated of is left to the discretion of the performer ; and he has stated, with great judgment, the rules which will govern such apcrson, if a master in the line of his profession. But suppose that no such consummate master can be obtained ; or that, if obtained, he is a master in another sense than the one here intended ; that is, he is an instructor, and wishes to in- crease the number of his pupils, by exhibiting the varieties of his talent and the force of his execution. Is it not evident, thai while he is at the organ, his object, and that of those win- seated him there, are not only different, but in opposition If he sacrifice theirs to his, would such a liberty be permit- 10 Singing of Psalms and Anthems. ted in any other line ? And when permitted in this, are there not strong appearances of its being the result of a want of sufficient interest felt by those who should control him ? As to voluntaries, the licentiousness of them is conspicuous in some places in those light airs which are calculated to send people dancing out of church. To the mind of him who now writes, it seems impossible that any man who, during the ser- vice, had been engaged in the duties of it, should, as soon as it is over, indulge himself in this light fancy. There is a well known remark of Mr. Addison, in which he compares a light voluntary after the service and the sermon, to a farce acted after a tragedy. In the latter case there being the professed design, and, in the former, strong appearances of the design of effacing any impression which may have been made by what went before. Independently on the high authority of Mr. Addison for taste and judgement, it may be affirmed, that the man who, having heard his remark, can conduct himself with- out any regard to the proper effect of it, has an important change of mind to undergo, before he can be fit to be entrust- ed with the government of any department in which the dig- nity and decorum of religious worship are concerned. On this part of the subject there ought not to be omitted a few words on the preposterous practice of playing between the lines of a verse. From the essay of Mr. Hopkinson already alluded to, it appears, that he could not endure this palpable contradiction of common sense. And if a performer should be so dull as not to comprehend, or have so little judgment as not to perceive the force of the reasons there opposed to it, he should be required to submit to the better information of those whose reputation in the musical line is established, and their taste undoubted. If any should imagine that there is an hardship in subject- ing a performer to the rules here advocated, let them give a reason, why there should be indulged to the station in question greater license than to the divinely instituted station of a cler- gyman ? Shall the latter be confined to prescribed prayers,and shall the former have the privilege of obtruding what has the effect of counteracting every use for which prayer was institu- ted ? But perhaps it may be thought that we cannot retain or procure performers on the terms proposed. The writer of this : of Psalms and MtheWU. 11 lias no such fear; if it be entertained by others, he n up his mind to the doing without then* But he is convinced that the danger is ideal. On taking a retrospect of what lias been written, in refer- tin e to both the branches of the subject, there seems ground ro recommend earnestly, that in all the appointments to office* attached to the musical department, \ in all (Valuing of choirs to aid it, regard should be had to the religious and the moral characters of those who offer. Due attention to this would of itself prevent many of the abuses complained of. Immorality in either of these descriptions of persons, has the effect of les- sening the respectability of the Church in the estimation of the observers. And as to religion, although it is far from the wish of him who writes, to force questions on any in regard to the emotions of their hearts, yet he never could perceive with what consistency any who have not the appearance of a pro- fession of it, can be permitted to meddle in our concerns. It is true, that a man neither moral nor religious, but entertain- ing due respect for the feelings of the congregation, would avoid insulting those feelings, by indulging himself in any indecorum in their presence. But it would be rather ludi- crous to make an ecclesiastical provision, having for its object those sensibilities, the want of which is a drawback from the character of the gentleman. And, therefore, the proper rule is the requiring of a religious profession, with a suitable practice. If there should seem excess in the measure of the censures of some of the abuses stated, it should be recollected that they are the result of the point of view in which the matter is con- templated: And this is, that as our blessed Saviour, when lu- purged the temple of the money-changers, gave as the reason of his conduct — " Make not my Father's house an house of merchandize ;" so, there is at least as much reason to say — make it not a place of amusement ; or of any thing which has a tendency to drive from the mind all devotion and all serious ness. In regard to the most material of the abuses complain ed of, the writer has been in the habit of considering the per petrators of them as not having the fear of God before their eyes. Are there not then accessible to such persons convivial parties ? are there not concerts ? are. there not theatres, in 12 Singing of Psalms and Anthems, which they may gratify their taste for musical amusement, without intruding on our devotions, to the disturbance of those who join in them ? Let such questions occur to them or not, our conduct should hold out the language to them, in reference to the service of our Church — (< You have no part or lot in this matter." There is not known to many, to what lengths liberties with us would be carried if permitted. One man publishes a book of music, ami desires of a Minister, that his tunes may be forthwith introduced, for the readier sale of his edition. Another entertains a kindness for a certain composer ; and in order that the fruits of his labour may be the better known through the medium of the service of a Church, an appeal is made to the supposed good nature of its Rector. And a third knows of some female, who teaches the elegant accomplishments of music ; and he thinks it will give her an eclat, if she can be exhibited in an orchestra. Oh ! how easy is it to bestow favours of this sort, under the cover of the principle, that mere amusement is to be an object of musical performance in our Churches ! But the principle is here rejected, and the opinion is avowed, that one necessary expedient for the disengaging of ourselves from the incon- veniences to which it has subjected us, is, not to suffer the interference of those who hold it, in any measures adopted for the improvement of our music. A distinction should be observed between this and the making use of professional talent in a safe way ; and the dis- tinction may be illustrated thus : If our Church at large were editing a book of Common Prayer, and if the Printer who could fabricate the most complete edition of it, were a man who felt no interest in its contents, we should approve of the employing of him, although we should never have thought of consulting him in the framing of the book. On the same principle, if a musical professor, indifferent to religion, have composed what we judge suitable to our worship, let us avail ourselves of his abilities; but let us not submit to him the question, what species of music is to our purpose. This brings to mind another matter worthy of being no- ticed. It is well known that some members of congregations ]gktg of Psalms and Jut/it m . 1 . have been occasionally offended, bj teeing persons exhibit- ed in their orchestras, as snipers, who never appear in any Churefa at anv other tunc ; and whose occupation, to sa\ the. least, is iinl'a\ourahlc to piety and morals. The offence has been considered by some others as the effect of weakness. In regard to persons so opposed in sentiment, it might, per- haps, be made a problem* whether the difference be the re- sult of greater weakness on- one side, or of less seriousness on the other. But supposing the matter decided clearly against the former, still it might be hoped that the strong would bear with the weak, in consideration of the principle before referred to in this essay, that of the law of associa- tion, the force of which is so much recognized by philoso- phical observers of human nature. We appeal to this law, in support of many of the institutions of our Church. In regard to kneeling in prayer, there are those who think it worth their while to assure us gravely, that the divine Being looks to the disposition of the heart. So, when we consecrate Churches, and set them apart from secular occasions, argu- ments are ostentatiously brought to demonstrate that there can be no sanctity in bricks and timbers. We cannot de- fend ourselves concerning such matters, but by reasons re- solvable into the said law of association. Apply all this to the subject in hand, and it will at least go to the extent of interdicting what has been stated as an occasion of offence. But it is time to hasten to a conclusion ; and there shall only be solicited, in regard to all which has been written, that the propriety of it may be judged of by the reasonable maxim in an apocryphal book of scripture — " Whatsoever thou takest in hand, remember the end, and thou shalt never do amiss." Philadelphia, 1808. SILAS. Gaylord Bro«. Makers Syracuse. N. Y. BK PAT. MR. 21. rera 3E AV 1-5 *>* ■ 1 iHH ■