/. 17. 7 PRINCETON, N. J. }^1 ^ Wle^en/e^/y. A-XX\\AxrVC\\A ■ Division. ^S:>^\\^.^ Section ....^^. ..C..G..( Shelf. Number Cg5.psy.J».. '>» ^///^*T->t»^ f,jL;/ifir/n^^U'^f'^^^ ^.^^^7^ HlBaiW THIOCEACY; A SMALL TREATISE INTENDED FOR SABBATH SCHOOLS CHRISTIAN FAMILIES. J. COGSWELL, D. D. "Neto^Bvunstoicfe: PRESS OF J. TERHUNE. 1848. PREFACE There is, perhaps, no subject contained in the volume of revelation, which is, at the same time, both so important and so imperfectly understood, by a large proportion of Christians, as the Theocracy of the* Hebrews. Very brief are the notices to be found of this form of government in the works of the most learned American divines. Their atten- tion has hitherto been almost exclusively directed to the doctrines or duties of Christianity. The consequence has been, that the four last books of the pentateuch have been too much neglected, as uninteresting to those, who live under the present dispensation. The works of distinguish- ed foreign writers, are too voluminous to be of general use in our churches, and many of them contain opinions man- ifestly erroneous and of dangerous tendency. A small treaties on the Hebrew Theocracy, suited to the wants of Christian families and Bible classes, appears to be needed. No work of the kind, it is believed, has ever been published in this country. It is not the intention of the author of this work, to quote largely from the writings of others. Much space is some- times occupied with the refutation of erroneous opinions, never before known to the reader. This may be done, not so much to benefit the reader, as to give reputation to the writer. A plain scripture view of the Hebrew Theocracy in its connexions is all that will be attempted. If it con- tribute to make any part of the volume of revelation in- teresting and instructive, which has been too nmch ne- glected, the object of the author will be attained. CONTENTS. General view of the Hebrew Theocracy, - - page 5 Ahrahamic Covenant, 9 Renewal of Covenant at Mount Sinai, - - 20 Moral Law, --- 22 Ceremonial Law, 25 The Judicial Law, - - - - - - 28 Institution of Sacrifices, 30 Golden Calf, 33 The Marriage Covenant, 36 King of the Hebrews, 39 Tabernacle, 40 Theocracy of the Hebrews a representative and hereditary Republic, .... 45 Levites, their duties and support, - - - - 49 Completion of the Hebrew Code of Laws, - - 54 Sabbath, 60 Festivals, 67 Future State, ---.,.-70 Condition of the Hebrews under the Theocracy, - 75 Slavery, - 87 Military arrangements, 89 Capital Punishment, 90 Conquest of Canaan, 96 Conclusion, ........ 102 THEOCRACY OF THE HEBREWS. The Theocracy of the Hebrews is that form of government, which God gave the posterity of Abraham, when they were en- camped before mount Sinai, soon after their miraculous dehverance from Egyptian bond- age. As this is the only form of a national government God himself ever gave to men, we ought to understand its principles and peculiarities. If we consider the character and circumstances of the Hebrews, when they received it, we shall be convinced that it was exactly suited to their wants, and was the result of infinite wisdom and benev- olence. The government of the United States more nearly resembles it in some of its most essential features, than any other that now exists or ever has existed. The prin- ciples, which give peculiar excellency to our 6 HEBREW THEOCRACY. government, were not derived from any merely human system, but from the holy scriptures — our magna charta, which makes known to us our rights and our duties. Those forms of government, which have been adopted by nations, ignorant of the volume of revelation, have been either too despotic or too radical. And the most radical have been subject to perpetual changes. That government is most perfect, which secures to all its subjects the greatest degree of freedom, which is consistent with the most satisfactory protection of their rights, and which is maintained and administered most exclusively by moral motives. Of such a government the true religion must be one essential element in its constitution and laws. The more intelligent and virtuous a nation is, the less burdensome is the support of its government, and the more perfect are the free- dom, security, and happiness of the people. The worship of the true God was made the fundamental law of the Hebrew Theoc- racy. The Hebrews, when they obtained HEBREW THEOCRACY. 7 quiet possession of the promised landj and obeyed the laws of the Theocracy, enjoyed inore freedom, were better protected than any other nation then on the earth. Though there lias been a change of dispensation since the death of Christ ; yet there has been no change in God, or in the principles of his government. The two dispensations corre- spond with each other — the former being pre- paratory to the latter, the one harmonizing with the other — and both but parts of the same system. Our knowledge of Christian- ity must be very limited without a correct understanding of the Hebrew Theocracy. And our knowledge of the latter must be imperfect without a knowledge of the form- er. The law was a shadow of good things to come, which things are now clearly re- vealed. The law could not be a shadow of good things to come, had not those things existed in the purposes of God, which pur- poses have been exactly accomplished. It is interesting to the Christian to notice the per- fect correspondence of the substance with HEBREW THEOCRACY. the shadow, and the fulfilment of the prom- ises of God. The Hebrews may be contemplated as a family^ a nation^ and a church. It is the more proper to view them under these differ- ent aspects, because the instructions, laws, and institutions, God gave them, may be divided into three classes — those, which pertain to their conduct as a family, those, which have respect to them as a nation, and those, which relate to the worship of God. The Hebrews as a family, when they left Egypt, were extremely ignorant of all the proprieties of domestic life — their conversa- tion and habits were not unlike those of barbarous and pagan nations. They were ignorant of the character of the true God, and of the method adopted for the redemp- tion of men. As they had lived among idolaters, they had no doubt adopted many of the opinions of those, among whom they had lived. And they had no knowledge of any national government, which was not despotic. The most important end to be HEBREW THEOCRACY. 9 answered by the Theocracy of the Hebrews, was the permanent estabUshment of the true religion in the world. This was suited to soften their manners, to correct their morals, and to promote their happiness. Nothing* was required of them, which was not in some way connected with their temporal or eternal welfare. The burthensome rites of the former dispensation were not intended to be perpetual. When Christ had com- pleted his work on the earth, and the dis- pensation of the Spirit cRnmenced, the burthensome rites of the former dispensation ceased to be obligatory. The Theocratic form of government was given to the Hebrews in fulfilment of prom- ises made to Abraham, their venerable an- cestor and progenitor. It was 430 years from the time, when he was called of God to leave his native country, and sojourn in Ca- naan, when his posterity reached mount Sinai. The fulfilment of the promises of God made known his purpose, when he made them, and proved his veracity. 10 HEBREW THEOCRACY. The first promise of a Savior, which was made to our first parents soon after their apostacy, did not limit its fulfilment to any branch of their family. So when Christ had accomplished in the world the work as- signed him, the gospel was preached to the Gentiles as well as to the Jews. All family and national distinctions in this particular forever ceased. Though God distinguished by his good- ness the family of Abraham from all other families ; he dianot exclude from heaven, any disposed to worship him with a penitent heart and to maintain a holy life. Indeed he made the family of Abraham a light and a blessing in the world. God said to him, and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed, (Gen. 22. 18.) All who were dis- posed to embrace the true religion, might enjoy equal religious privileges with the family of Abraham. It was on account of the ignorance, the idolatry, and wickedness, which prevailed in the world, that God separated one family HEBREW THEOCRACY. 11 from all others— made revelations to it of his holy character and his purposes of grace. The family of Abraham may be compared to a living fountain, from which flow streams, fertilizing and refreshing the dry and thirsty portions of the earth. Many of his family — some among them kings and prophets, were the worshippers of the true God. By them the revelations God made of his purposes of grace were carefully preserved. Terrible as were the effects of the deluge, the descendants of Noah, when they were numerous, became corrupt, lost sight of the design of the institution of sacrifices, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things. Why God did not more fully reveal himself to them, and pour out his spirit upon them we know not. It has been his pleasure to make a gradual revela- tion of his gracious purposes to the children of men, and also to give them an opportunity to be convinced of their inability to discover 12 HEBREW THEOCRACY. any way of salvation. Even now there are some, who, trusting in their own wisdom, prefer the light of reason to the clear light of revelation The history of the world affords abundant proofs of the insufficiency of hu- man reason and the necessity of revelation. In all countries not favored with the scrip- tures, thepeople are ignorant of the character of the true God — idolaters, immoral, and extremely wicked. Abram was living in Mesopotamia among idolaters, and was seventy-five years of age, when God called him to be a saint, and to be a light in the world. Now the Lord said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country, and from thy kindred, and from thy father's house, unto a land that I will show thee : and I will make of thee a great nation, and I will bless thee, and I will make thy name great ; and thou shall be a blessing : and 1 will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curseth thee, and in thee shall all the families of the earth be blessed. (Gen. 12. 1 — 3.) Greatly as God distinguished HEBREW THEOCRACY. 13 by his goodness Abraham and his family, all that he did for them was intended to ben- efit mankind. Christ the promised seed, hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us, said the apostle, that the. blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Jesus Christ. (Gala- tians 3. 13, 14. The Lord appeared unto Abraham, when he was in Canaan, and said, Unto thy seed will I give this land. This promise was several times repeated. And the Lord said unto Abram after Lot was separated from him, Lift up now thine eyes, look from the place where thou art, northward and south- ward, and eastward and westward ; for all the land which thou seest, to thee will I give it and to thy seed forever. And 1 will make thy seed as the dust of the earth, so that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered. Arise, and walk through the land, in the length of it, and in the breadth of it, for I will give it un- to thee. (Gen. 13. 14-17.) 14 HEBREW THEOCRACY. Now it cannot be supposed that God in- tended to give, or, that Abram expected his family to enjoy, possession of the land prom- ised him, till his posterity were sufficiently numerous to occupy it. After a sojourn of 215 years in the land of Canaan, the family of Abraham consisted of but seventy souls. But in 215 years more they numbered 600, 000 men of war, over twenty years of age. They were prob- ably not much less numerous than the Amer- ican colonies, when their struggle for free- dom and independence commenced. It was the will of God that the Hebrews should for a season be oppressed, that they might be willing to leave the country, where they were born, and to seek a distant home. Powerful motives were necessary to induce them forever to leave a well cultivated coun- try, and to commence a journey with their families and their flocks to a land, of which their knowledge was very limited. Had not our puritan fathers been cruelly persecuted, they would not have left their native coun- HEBREW THEOCRACY. 15 try and friends, crossed a wide and tempest- uous ocean, and planted churches among savages in a howling wilderness. In the one case deliverance from physical evils, in the other liberty of conscience, was sought. Much more excellent and noble were the motives, whichinfluenced our puritan fathers than those, which influenced the Hebrews. When the Hebrews left Egypt, it does not appear that there was but one learned man among them. Moses, we are informed, was learned in all the wisdom of Egypt. He en- joyed all the advantages for an education, which royalty could afford. But when our ancestors made their escape from their op- pressors, they were a holy people, many of whom were well educated. Though our freedom and independence were not obtain- ed by miracles ; we have abundant reason to admire the covenant faithfulness of God.* The Hebrews, when they left Egypt, need- * God has been plensed to make these United States, as well as the posterity of Abraham, a model nation, to which the oppressed in Europe are now looking with intense in- terest. 16 HEBKEW THEOCRACY. ed some one to lead them and to teach them every thing, important for them to know, and of which they were almost totally igno- rant. By a series of miracles God supported, and protected them. He directed them to a place which had long been prepared for them, where they were not disturbed by other nations, and where they could in the most favorable circumstances receive his messages.* They had become sufficiently numerous to occupy the land promised to the patriarchs and their posterity. But they were [unfit for self-government — and were ignorant of any form of government, which could secure to all freedom, protection and happiness. Without a well arranged and well balanced government, they were not prepared to enter the land of promise. Had they marched directly to Canaan after their * A late traveller, Miner K. Kellogg, more fortunate than Dr. Robinson, has discovered a plain directly in front of mount Sinai of sufficient extent for the encampment of the tribes of Israel, with low hills surrounding it, aflbrding herbage for numerous flocks and herds. — Literary World Feb. 19, 1848. HEBREW THEOCRACY. 17 escape from Egypt, which, on account of the distance, they might have done in a few days, without adopting any form of government and proper code of laws, they would have been more miserable than they were in Egypt. God, who knew what they needed, detain- ed them on their way to the land of promise, for the purpose of giving them the best form of government and code of laws they were capable of receiving. When they arrived at mount Sinai, they were distinguished from all other people by the rite of circumcision and the institution of the Passover. That the rite of circumcision was of divine origin hardly admits of a doubt. It could never have been suggested by the light of nature, and would never have been observed had not God required it. This was a rite, which of all others corrupt heathen nations would be least disposed, without strong reasons, to practice in imitation of the Hebrews. It was a sign or emblem, by which the Hebrews were taught the necessity of the mortifica- 18 HEBREW THEOCRACY. tion of sinful lusts and the circumcision of the heart. It was unknown till the time of Abraham. It was a rite applicable only to males, probably to intimate that the Messiah must be a male.* The Passover commem- orated an event, which no other nation could commemorate. It was observed but once, and circumcision not once in the wilder- ness. It must not be forgotten that the Hebrews were the family of Abraham, to whom God had been revealing himself more and more perfectly for 430 years. It was his will that they should know his character, and have abundant proofs of his faithfulness, before they deliberately engaged to do all he might require of them. They were, therefore, pre- pared to act understandingly and freely, and * Some lenrned men have expressed the opinion, witJiout the least authority, that Abraham derived his knowledge of the rite of circumcision from the Egyptians. But the Bible is the only book which gives us any account of the customs, practised at so early a period. Cirucmcision was designed to distinguish the family of Abraham from all other families. HEBREW THEOCRACY. 19 to make their choice, whether to worship and serve the true God, who had done such great things for them, or the gods of the sur- rounding nations. RENEWAL OF COVENANT, The renewal of the covenant, which God estabhshed with the patriarch Abraham, was preparatory to the transactions which fol- lowed. We have an account of this transaction in the 19th chapter of Exodus. In the third month, when the children of Israel were gone forth out of the land of Egypt, the same day came they into the wilderness of Sinai. And Moses went up unto God and the Lord call- ed unto him out of the mountain, saying, Thus shalt thou say unto the house of Jacob and tell the children of Israel : Ye have seen what I did unto the Egyptians, and how I bare you on eagles' wings and brought you unto myself. Now, therefore, if ye will obey my voice indeed, and keep my cove- HEBREW THEOCRACY. 21 nant, then ye shall be a peculiar treasure unto me above all people ; for all the earth is mine : and ye shall be unto me a kingdom of priests, and a holy nation. These are the words, which thou shalt speak unto the children of Isra'el. And Moses came, and called for the elders of the people, and laid before their fcices all these words which the Lord commanded him. And all the people answered and said, all that the Lord hath spoken we will do. And Moses returned the words of the people unto the Lord. Thus the covenant made with Abraham, when he was a sojourner in the land of Carfaan, was solemnly renewed, and received the approbation of his posterity, when a great people, whom God was about to make a free and an independent nation. This covenant, of which Christ is the surety, is the founda- tion of the Theocracy and is one of its essen- tial elements. All the preliminary arrange- ments being completed, God commanded Moses to sanctify the people that they might 22 HEBREW THEOCRACY. be ready for the third day. And be ready, God said, against the third day, for the third day the Lord will come down in the sight of the people upon mount Sinai. The terrific displays God made of his power, and the revelations he made of his holiness, when he came down upon mount Sinai, wereXe designed to prepare the He- brews to receive his holy law from his own month. The law he gave them was the moral law, the law of the ten commandments. This is the law of nature and the covenant of works. Such solemnity attended the giving of the law, as to make the impression on the mind of every one, that it was the law of God. The moral law is the law of all mankind, written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the meanwhile accusing, or else excusing one another. This law is discoverable from the light of nature, and is the foundation and standard of moral virtue, and the rule of all just government. It was not a new law, HEBREW THEOCRACY. 23 when delivered by God to the Hebrews. It was the law of onr first parents and of all that had lived before the Hebrews came to monnt Sinai, and is now, and ever will be, the law of all the nations and families of the earth. Bnt there never had been, probably any verbal, certainly any written pnblication of it, before this time. There never had been a man qualified to give a consistent and satisfactory interpretation of the law of na- ture, in any well understood language. It was a proof of the wisdom and goodness of God to give to his covenant people, the He- brews, a verbal or a written interpretation of the law of nature. The Hebrews were so enlightened and their consciences were so awakened, when they Hstened to the publica- tion of the moral law, from the mouth of God himself, that they could but approve it, though it condemned their conduct. Here we can but notice the wisdom and holiness of God, in grivinof to the Hebrews from his own mouth, the moral law, and also in giving it to them written with his own 24 HEBREW THEOCRACY. hand on tables of stone, before he gave to them tlie ceremonial law. Their approba- tion of the moral law, which is a covenant of works, was a solemn renewal of it, and an acknowledjjement of their oblioration to do all that it required of them. But, when their minds were so enlightened as to have a proper view of its extent and spirituality ; their consciences must have condemned them for their numerous transgressions, and con- vinced them of the impossibility of being justified by their works. They were greatly terrified and were prepared to receive all the rites of the ceremonial law without murmur- ing. Men under deep conviction are wilhng to do any thing required of them to obtain relief. Burthensome as the ceremonial law was, the burden was light compared with that which idolaters imposed on themselves. The types pointed to Christ the only Savior of lost men — the emblems taught them spiritual truth — the application of water in various forms taught them the necessity of internal holiness. HEBREW THEOCRACY. '25 The object of the ceremonial huv was to teach the Hebrews by things visible and well known, the method God had devised and adopted for the redemption of men. This was a mode of instruction best adapted to the understanding of so ignorant and gross a peo- ple. The illustrations of spiritual truths, employed by Christ and all the sacred wri- ters were taken from objects and scenes well known to the many. The Hebrews were in a state of minority, like little children, and could not bear the clear light, which now shines on the Christian church. Like Naa- man, the Syrian, they were willing to do some orreat thinar to obtain the favor of God. It is the simplicity of the gospel and its in- stitutions, which now offends maiiy, who bear the Christian name. The Hebrews were required to attend to those things by which they might learn the way of salva- tion — but after all they could not be accepted unless voluntary in the worship of God. The more perfectly we understand the ceremonial law, the more we shall admire 26 HEBREW THEOCRACY. the wisdom and benevolence of God man- ifested in all its parts. The Hebrews were not prepared for a spiritual dispensation. Wl:en they said to Moses, Speak thou with us and we will hear ; but let not God. speak with us lest we die ; they felt the need of some one to stand between them and God— some visible person, from whom they could re- ceive the messages of God, and some one, by whom they could make known their wants to God. When Moses had been the second time long with God in the mount the people could not behold him, till his face was covered with a veil. If Christians see spiritual things through a glass darkly ; much more obscure must have been the views of good men under the former dispensation. The latter felt the need of a mediator and intercessor, of wliom Moses was himself a type. Without such a person they felt -that they must perish. They were convinced that they must look out of themselves for help. It was sufficient for them to know that God would accept their services ; if HEBREW THEOCRACY. 2i faithfully performed in obedience to his com- mands, with penitent and humble trust in him. Christianity embraces the moral law, the covenant with Abraham, and the things signified by the types and emblems of the ceremonial law. THE JUDICIAL LAW The Judicial, or National Law was not given immediately by God himself, as he gave the Hebrews the moral law. God spake to Moses, and he communicated the messages he received to the people. The moral and judicial laws were published at the same time, and being united constituted the nation- al covenant. The people were required to make an altar of earth, to be used while they were before mount Sinai, and which could not be removed from place'to place, like that afterward made, to accompany the taberna- cle. The 21, 22 and 23 chapters of Exodus contain the national law. The fulfilment of the promises of this covenant was intimately connected with their obedience to its requisitions. Their imperfect obedience was accepted on account HEBREW THEOCRACY. 29 of the merits of the surety promised to the patriarch Ahraham. And Moses came and told the people all the words of the Lord and all the judg- ments : and all the people answered with one voice and said. All the words lohich the Lord hath said loill we do. Thus the national covenant was confirmed by the vol- untary act of the Hebrew nation. And Moses wrote all the words of the Lord, and rose up early in the morning and builded an altar under the hill, and twelve pillars, according to the twelve tribes of Israel. And he sent young men of the child- ren of Israel, which offered burnt-oiferings and sacrificed peace-offerings of oxen unto the Lord. And Moses took half of the blood and put it in basins ; and half of the blood he sprinkled on the altar. And he took the book of the covenant, and read in the audi- ence of the people : and they said, all that the Lord hath said will we do, and he obedi- ent. And Moses took the blood, which he had saved in basins and sprinkled it on the 30 HEBREW THEOCRACY. people, and said behold the blood of the covenant, which the Lord hath made with you concerning all these things. Thus the national covenant was sealed with blood — the blood sprinkled on the altar and on the people.— Ex. 24. 3-9. The blood by which the national covenant was sealed was typical of the blood of Christ. The mercy of God, exercised through the mediation of Christ, was one of the elements in this covenant, otherwise no act of the imperfect obedience of the Hebrews could have been accepted. Pefect obedience was not the condition, on which the fulfilment of the promises made to them depended. Those, who were spirit- ually enlightened, could not but see that their very best performances, were not the foundation of their justification in the sight of God, who demands perfect holiness of all men. Abraham and all the pious of his pos- terity were justified by faith. The patriarch was well acquainted with the institution of sacrifices. He could not have expected to please God by oflTermg HEBREW THEOCRACY. 31 sacrifices, unless he had understood the design of the institution, and beHeved it to be of divine appointment. Nothing can be more unreasonable than to suppose it was of human origin. No one could have known except by revelation that God had a Son, much less that he would become incarnate, and consent by his obedience and death to make an atonement for apostate man. The light of nature gives no such information. The moral law contains no intimation of the forgiving love of God. Who could have known without a revelation, that God would pardon any transgressor of his law? And, without a revelation, who could have thought that the slaughter of innocent an- imals, when offered in sacrifice would be approved of God? To slay innocent an- imals — the creatures of God, and to burn them upon an altar, without authority from him to do so, must have been highly offen- sive to him. The sacrifice Abel offered, the scriptures inform us was accepted because offered by faith. But his faith must have 32 HEBREW THEOCRACY. had an object, of which he could have had no knowledge without a revelation. When he slew the animal he offered in sacrifice, he confessed by the act that he deserved death, and must depend on such a substitute as God was pleased to appoint. The skins with which God clothed Adam and Eve were emblematical of that perfect righteous- ness, by which all vitally united to Christ are protected from the future consequences of sin, and made joint heirs with him to an incorruptible inheritance. It is the right- eousness of Christ imputed to believers, which is the foundation of their justification. THE GOLDEN CALF. From the fulfilment of the promises of the national covenant, which God made to the Hebrews, it is manifest that he intended to become their king, to dwell in the midst of them, and for their protection and support, to accompany them to the land of Canaan. That they might become acquainted with the different departments of his govern- ment — the kind of building in which he would choose to dwell — and that they might have the moral law written on tables of stone ; he called Mos'^s up into the mount, where he remained forty days and forty nights. While there, God showed him the pattern of the tabernacle which the Hebrews were required to erect for his habitation — he gave him an account of all the materials, of which it was to be built— and also of all the parts 34 HEBREW THEOCRACY. of the religions worship to be performed in it. And when the people saw that Moses delayed to come down out of the mount — they became discontented — and the people gathered themselves together unto Aaron, and said unto him. Up, make us gods, which shall go before us ; for as for this Moses, the man that brought us up out of the land of Egypt, we know not what has become of him. This act of rebellion was known to God and greatly offended him. And Moses' anger waxed hot when it was known to him, and [he cast the tables of stone out of his hands, on which God had written with his own hand the moral law, and brake them beneath the mount. To manifest his hatred of sin and to exhibit his consistency of character, God said to the Levites, who ap- peared on his side — Put every man his sword by his side, and go in and out from gate to gate throughout the camp and slay every man his brother, and every man his com- panion and every man his neighbor. And the children of Israel did according to the HEBREW THEOCRACY. 35 word of Moses : and there fell of the people that day about three thousand men. — Ex- odus 32. 27. When God had made a most affecting rev- elation of his hatred of sin, the sin of idolatry, and his determination to punish it, when committed by his covenant people ; he was pleased also to make a revelation of his for- giving love.* — Ex. 34. 6, 7. Moses being again called into the mount, by the command of God, hewed out two tables of stone, the former being broken, and * Here we cannot but notice, how little dependence can be placed on the resolutions and promises made, when large numbers are assembled and are greatly excited, as they have been many times in protracted meetings. When the Hebrews stood before mount Sinai, and answered, All that the Lord hath said we will do, they appeared to man- ifest unreserved submission to his will. Again, when they had received the judicial law — they said. All that the Lord hath said will we do and be obedient. This engagement was sealed with blood. Within forty days from this time they had made a calf, and were worshipping it, which proved that their hearts were not right in the sight of God. They could worship him with their lips when their hearts are far from him. 36 HEBREW THEOCRACY. God wrote his law upon them. They were placed in the tabernacle when it was finish- ed and kept for a long time. God on this occasion drew closer the ties, which bound him to the Hebrews. The covenant he made with them was a marriage covenant and he declared himself to be a jealous God* Ex. 34. 10-14. The connexion between husband and wife, is the most tender and affectionate that exists among men. So ought men to love their wives as their own bodies, he that loveth his wife loveth him- self. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother and cleave to his wife, and they two shall be one flesh. — Eph. 5. 28-31. For thy Maker is thine husband, the Lord of hosts is his name, and thy Redeemer the holy one of Israel, the God of the whole earth shall he be called. — Is. 54. 5. The connexion between God and his people be- came the most intimate, which is known among men. Here it may be observed some have thought that alphabetical writing was not known, till the law was written on the HEBREW THEOCRACY. 37 tables of stone. But, as God gave his law from his mouth in language the Hebrews understood ; so no doubt some of them had such a knowledge of alphabetical writing, as to be able to read the written law. A re- cord of the tribes and the families of the He- brews was probably kept by genealogists in Egypt. Moses was required to write in a book for a memorial an account of the battle with Amalek, fought on their way to Sinai. Ex. 17. 14. Why might not the Hebrews acquire a knowledge of alphabetical writing as well as other nations — and why not as well before they came to mount Sinai as afterwards. It is highly probable that the author of the book of Job was acquainted with alphabetical writing, and, as it contains no notice of the passage of the Hebrews through the Red Sea, that it was written be- fore that event. Laws would be useless if not published in a language understood by those required to obey them. Moses was com- manded to write the judicial law in a book, 38 HEBREW THEOCRACY. and to read it to the people. When did he learn to write? Many are too mncli inclined to overlook the providence of God, and the secret sug- gestions of his spirit in those discoveries and inventions, which have been productive of great good, and have been subservient to the accomplishment of his purposes. They are more disposed to honor the instruments God employs, than him, who is the fountain of knowledge and wisdom. And they are more ready to honor human reason than the teaching of the Spirit of God. KING OF THE HEBREWS. Though by the national covenant God became the King of the Hebrews, yet he did not cease to sustain the relation of Father. He continued to treat them as his children. They were his chosen, his peculiar people, his portion. By the marriage covenant God became the husband of the Hebrews, and dwelt with them, supported them and sus- tained a nearer relation to them than a king sustains to his subjects, or a parent to his children. It was an unspeakable favor to have the greatest and most excellent of all beings dwell in the midst of his people, to whom they could on all occasions have free access, and with whom they could daily commune. Whenever they looked toward the taber- 40 HEBREW THEOCRACY. nacle they saw the dwelling place of their Heavenly Father, their king, and their hus- band, and were reminded of the duties they owed him. Though the tabernacle, built according to the pattern showed to Moses on the mount, was very splendid and costly;* yet it was a national edifice, intended for the habitation of a Great King. No one was compelled to contribute for its erection. The people gave willingly, and more than was needed. Such inquiries as the following may be suggested to the mind of some, when reading the scripture account of the tabernacle. Why was such a splendid and costly house built for the dwelling place of the most high God, the Creator of heaven and earth ? Can God be pleased with earthly grandeur? Can that God, whom the heaven of heavens can- not contain, dwell in a house made by men ? Is not heaven his throne and the earth his footstool ? Is not the universe his proper dwelling place? Does he not fill immensity? * It cost, it is calculated, more than $1, 000, 000. HEBREW THEOCRACY. 41 It may be answered, it was not the beauty of the tabernacle that pleased God, the King of the Hebrews. But he was pleased with the proofs his people gave of their disposi- tion to honor liim. It was of great import- ance, that the impression should be made on the minds of the young, that the king whom they were required to obey, and the God whom they were required to worship, was one whom their fathers higlily esteemed and delighted to honor. It was an age when spiritual things were taught by things visible. It has been customary in all ages for great na- tions to erect elegant and expensive buildings for the habitation of their sovereicrns. The law of association has a powerful influence. When the Hebrews looked toward the tabern- acle or temple, the dwelling place of their sovereign, their thoughts of him were honor- able. It was no doubt the desire of the He- brews that the palace of their sovereign should not be inferior to that of any other sovereign. Their support, protection, influence, peace and happiness depended on the treatment 42 HEBREW THEOCRACY. their sovereign received from them. But what was proper and even necessary under the former dispensation, when instruction was communicated by visible emblems, is not proper now — under a spiritual dispensa- tion. The simplicity of the truths of Christi- anity is one of their excellencies. They that worship God, who is a spirit, in spirit and truth, are accepted of him. Though the univeri>e is the dwelling place of God, yet he has ever dwelt in a peculiar sense in the midst of his people. Under the former dispensation the holy of holies was the place of his abode, where he was always to be found, when his special assistance was needed. Under this dispensation his people are the temple in which he dwells. For thus saith the iiigh and lofty One that inhab- iteth eternity, whose name is Holy ; I dwell in the high and holy place, with him also that is of a contrite and humble spirit, to re- vive the spirit of the humble, and to revive the heart of the contrite ones. Is. hi \ 15. What ! said the apostle to the church at HEBREW THEOCRACY. 43 Corinth, Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost, which is in yon, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own, IjCoY. 6 : 19. Corresponding with the splendor of the house built for the dwelling place of the God and king of the Hebrews, was the apparel of the high priest, his high- est officer and prime minister. It was high- ly proper for those who honored God, to honor him, who stood nearest to him, re- ceived his messao^es and delivered them to his people. The beautiful and costly gar- ments of the high priest, were emblematical of the excellence of his office, and the im- portance of the duties he was required to perform. The garments the other priests were required to put on were decent but not expensive. Aaron and his sons as well as the tabern- acle were consecrated before the worship of God commenced in the sanctuary. When the preparations were completed the glory of the liOrd filled the tabernacle. Though God did in a peculiar sense and 44 HEBREW THEOCRACY. by a visible token dwell among the Hebrews, and answer difficult questions proposed to him by the high priest ; yet he does now dwell by his spirit in every christian nation, and answer their inquiries, when by humili- ation and prayer they ask for the way they ought to pursue. It is true they hear no voice, but their duty is made plain. He dwells more especially in his church — walk- ing in the midst of the golden candlesticks. And more especially still God dwells with the most devout and humble. He reveals himself to his people according to their neces- sities. When he revives his work he ap- pears in his glory. Then his people have the most satisfactory proof of his special presence. Then they hear God speaking to them, almost forgetful of the instrument em- ployed. Sinners pricked in their hearts are more deeply and permanently affected than were the Hebrews, when they stood before mount Sinai and answered — all that the Lord hath said will we do. The Theocracy of the Hebrews was a re- HEBREW THEOCRACY. 45 ligioiis, hereditary, representative republic ; or as some learned men* maintain a democ- racy. The church and state were united. This union was necessary under the former dispensation. Tlie civil power was required to enforce the strict observance of the burden- some rites of the ceremonial law. Had not the civil power been united with the ecclesi- astical, the Hebrews would have in a short time been deprived of the only means, by which a knowledge of the true God and of the nature of his worship would have been retained, and succeeding generations would have become idolaters. It was a proof of the benevolence of God, the king of the He- brews, to enforce by pains and penalties the observance of those rites, by which alone they could know their duty and the way of salvation. So far as regarded the feelings of their heart, there was no compulsion ; but they were perfectly free. The former dispensation was a necessary preparation to the latter and to the firm establishment of *Michaelis and Lowman. 46 HEBREW THEOCRACY. Christianity in the world. The two dispen- sations are but parts of the same whole — exactly answering to each other. The offices of the priests were hereditary. This was a wise arrangement. As the worship of God corresponded with the re- quisitions of the ceremonial law, evidence of spiritual renovation was not made an es- sential qnalification for the office of a priest. External defects rendered the sons of Aaron unfit for the sacred office. Had not the office of priest been hereditary, his election would have occasioned endless and bloody disputes. If they could prove their descent from Aaron, they could prove their right to the office. The family of Levi was the only family from generation to generation permitted to minis- ter in holy things. Their cities and sup- port as well as duties were the same from generation to generation. The principle of representation was in various ways recognized in the Hebrew code. The messages of God were delivered to Moses, while he was living, and com- HEBREW THEOCRACY. 47 municated by him to the elders of the people, and by them to the whole congregation. The Levites represented the whole nation and acted for all the tribes — the priests rep- resented the Levites — and the high priest the ordinary priests. The princes acted for the tribes over which their influence specially extended ; but it does not appear that they received any compensation for their services. And in the best days of their nation their services were not onerous. The Theocracy was as democratic as it could be consistently with the protection of the rights of every one. The most perfect democracy is that which secures to every citizen the free exercise of his rights. But no one can enjoy the free exercise of his rights, if the more powerful are not made to submit to good and wholesome laws. And that government is least burthensome which is administered by moral motives. So gross were the Hebrews, when they left Egypt, that God wisely connected with their obedi- ence and disobedience temporal rewards and 48 HEBREW THEOCRACY. punishments. When obedient they were prospered and their enemies fell before them. They had visible proofs of the advantages of obedience and of the folly as well as guilt of disobedience. When obedient they were more highly favored than any other nation. Of this they had visible evidence. And what nation on the earth manifests so general a respect as this for the true religion? And what nation is so prosperous, intelligent and happy? The code of laws God gave the Hebrews was perfect — needed no addition or altera- tion. Their form of government and code of laws they approved, and they were just such as they would have chosen, had they acted for themselves with a proper regard to their highest interest and happiness. In this sense their government may be considered as democratic. God who knew what was best for them, and who sustained a near re- lation to every one, took their pkce. His act by their approbation was their act. As their laws were all from God, so they all had, HEBREW THEOCRACY. 49 more or less of a religious character. He thought more of their salvation than of their temporal happiness. The most devoted christian now sees God in every event, and acknowledges him in all his ways. It is morally wrong to disobey any jnst civil law, any enactment by proper authority, which is not contrary to the Divine law. The administration of the Hebrew gov- ernment depended very much on the Levites. Their duties were numerous. In addition to the assistance they were required to render to the priests, they were the instructors of the people and the interpreters of the laws. They were required to read the laws once in seven years to the people, when asssem- bled at the feast of tabernacles. The Levites were the learned class. They were the lawyers — the judges, the physicians, the chronologers, the genealogists, the astron- omers, the geographers — had the charge of the weights and measures — the tithes — and the money paid into the sanctuary. In the 50 HEBREW THEOCRACY. military operations the priests were required to address and encourage the people. The Levites were inferior to the priests, and the priests to tlie high priest, who was permitted to enter the holy of holies but once a yeir. The higli priest was permitted with profouiid reverence to present to God diffi- cult questions, which he himself could not answer. The answers God gave prevented all controversy. What disputes would be prevented in the christian church, and what expense would be saved, could every diffi- cult question be decided by an infallible judge! The law which God gave the He- brews contained all the information they needed for the proper regulation of their conduct. They were free from the expense of legislation. It was the will of God that the Levites should be well supported. The faithful performance of the duties all the tribes owed to God, depended very much on the fidelity of the Levites. And their influ- ence was in some degree dependent on their apparent responsibility. A fearful respon- HEBREW THEOCRACr. 51 sibility rested on them. And it was of great importance that their influence should be felt. The LeviteSj including the priests, were the only persons the other tribes were taxed to support. Their support, though liberal, was but moderate, if we consider the many and important duties they had to perform, and the responsibility resting upon them. The wisdom ai d benevolence of God were manifested in his appointment, for the administration of his government and the direction of the affairs of his people, men of mature years, educated from their earliest years for their employment. The best of their life from thirty to fifty years of age, was devoted to the service of God. They were not allowed to officiate till properly qualified, nor after they experienced the in- firmities of age. Forty-eight cities with their suburbs, were given to the Levites. Of these, thirteen were given to the priests, and six were cities of refuge. As there was but one place where God was publicly wor- shiped, the cities o{ the priests were near 52 HEBREW THEOCRACY. too^ether. Three of the cities of refiio^e were on one side of the river of Jordan and three on the other, that they might be accessible to all, who might have occasion to flee to them. The cities of the Levites were so situated in different parts of the country, that they could without inconvenience visit all the tribes and discharge their various duties. Our pilgrim fathers judged correctly, who thought men of piety, if otherwise qualified, would be the most upright and faithful magistrates. They made the scriptures, the teachings of heavenly wisdom, their guide. The following is the scripture direction. Thou shalt provide out of the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousncbs, and place such over them to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hund- reds, and rulers of tens. Ex. 18: 21. Un- der the Theocracy the civil power was sub- ordinate to the ecclesiastical. The time will doubtless come, when the scriptures will be the supreme law of all nations, and none HEBREW THEOCRACY. 53 but men who fear God, will be magistrates. The officers appointed by the suggestion of Jethro to assist Moses were continued proba- bly but a short time. And the seventy chosen and instructed by the teachings of the Holy Spirit to assist him were not proba- bly continued after, if until his death. Neither Moses nor Joshua had any successor in his particular office. Their offices were different. THE COMPLETION OF THE HEBREW CODE OF LAWS. After the worship of God commenced in the tabernacle, and before the Hebrews left mount Sinai and commenced their journey, God completed their code of laws. This is a remarkable fact which deserves particular notice. In less than one year God gave to the Hebrews a perfect code of laws, which needed no addition or modification. The Hebrews needed no legislative assemblies to make more laws, or to repeal or alter any of those given. God as judge was the inter- preter of the laws he had given to his people. His laws were suited to all the varieties of their condition. The first table of the moral law, — the law of the ten commandments, had respect to the worship of God, the king of the Hebrews. HEBREW THEOCRACY. 55 Transgression of the laws of this table was punishable with death. As God was the king of the Hebrews, idolatry was high treason, a crime punishable in every nation with death. Tn pagan nations we find that contempt of the gods they worshiped was punishable with great severity. The three friends of the prophet Daniel were thrown into a fiery furnace, heated seven times hotter than usual, because they refused to worship the golden image the king of Babylon had set up. In papal countries to treat with con- tempt the objects worshiped, is to be exposed to punishment worse than death. The per- manent establishment of the true religion among the Hebrews, who had lived among idolaters, and who were surrounded by them, was of great importance to them, to the world, ar.d to all succeeding generations. It was necessary that the punishment should be as visible as the crime. For so ignorant and gross a people as the Hebrews, no other punishment would have given them a proper 56 HEBREW THEOCRACY. view of the holiness of God, and of the evil of the sin of idokitry. The only visible token God gave them of his presence was unlike any of the human race, or any creature, whether animate or inanimate. Idolatry, which was a rejection of the true God and open opposition to him, was destructive of the souls and morals of the people. It was enticing, because it allow- ed and even encouraged the most licentious andicorrupt practices. We find a great variety of particular laws, which prohibited practices, some of them harmless in themselves, but to which idolaters attached a superstitious im- portance. Pagan as well as papal nations depended much on their works for justifica- tion. Men in all nations have felt the need of some religion, and have been willing to work, if they could receive credit for their works. In reference to a custom of idolaters, which they thought meritorious, God said to the Hebrews, ye shall not cut yourselves, nor make any baldness between your eyes ; ye shall not print any marks in your flesh ; HEBREW THEOCRACY. 57 for ye are a holy people nnto the Lord. As the heathen were accustomed to worship in groves, where every abomination could be practised, the Hebrews were not allowed to plant groves near the altar of God. Thou shalt not seethe a kid in its mother's milk, was a prohibition — which had reference to the following practice. The heathen when they had gathered in their fruits, we are in- formed, were accustomed to do this, and with magical rites sprinkled it on their gar- dens to make them friutful. Because honey and leavened bread were offered to infernal gods and dbad heroes, God would not allow the Hebrews to use them at his altar. Be- cause men in the worship of Venus appeared in the dress of women, and women in the worship of Mars were arrayed in the war- like; garb of men, the following prohibition was added to the Hebrew code. The woman shall not wear that which pertaineth to a man, nor shall a man put on a woman's garment : for all who do so are abomination to the Lord thy God. 58 HEBREW THEOCRACY. Very many are the commands and pro- hibitionSj which may appear to us at this present day unimportant and unworthy of the notice of so great a Legislator as Jehovah himself. But his government extends to all the little circumstances of our life, which can have any influence on our conduct. Not a sparrow falleth to the ground without him, and the very hairs of our head are all numbered. God directed the Hebrews how to build their houses, that none might be in- jured by falling from the roof. He gave them many directions respecting the cultiva- tion of their ground, that they might not adopt any of the superstitious practices of the heathen. It was the will of God to keep the Hebrews as separate from their pagan neighbors as possible. All those commands and prohibitions, which appear to us so un- important, are so many proofs of the omnis- cience of God and of his abounding love of his people. Those portions of the Hebrew law, which receive from many but a passing notice, when made subjects of meditation. HEBREW THEOCRACY. 59 appear to be exceedingly interesting. The watchful eye of the God of the Hebrews — their Father, their Husband and their King, was upon every action any of them perform- ed — and upon every proof of an intimation to observe any of the rites or customs of idolaters, to which they attached a supersti- tious importance. Not one of the minute directions God gave the Hebrews was useless. This is manifest to every one who considers their ignorance and the innumerable super- stitious rites and practices of idolaters. Many commands and prohibitions have respect to moral purity in families, which it is not nec- essary to mention. They now receive atten- tion from virtuous parents, who derived their knowledge originally from the scriptures. THE SABBATH. The law of the Sabbath is a law of our nature. The rest of the Sabbath is as essen- tial to our health as the rest of the night. This has been shown by medical men. Without necessary sleep, as with it, no man can accomplish as much and enjoy as good health for any considerable length of time. And no man or beast can perform as much without resting one day in seven, as with the benefit of this rest. The man who puts forth his whole strength for ten or twelve hours, feels the need of the rest of the night. This prepares him for the labor of the suc- ceeding day. During six days of labor there is a gradual exhaustion of strength, and the rest of one day in seven is necessary to sup- ply the wants of nature. The human sys- tem may be compared to curious pieces of HEBREW THEOCRACY. 61 mechanism, one of which requires daily to be wound up, another once in seven days. The law of the Sabbath extends to other animals as well as to men. The main- tenance of the worship of the true God, and the cultivation of moral virtue, depend on the observance of the law of the Sabbath. Abolish the Sabbath and the evil passions of men can be restrained only by physical force. And without the observance of a particular day, the worshipers of the true God must be exposed to perpetual interruptions, and men of business themselves must be subject to inconvenience. The appointment of one day in seven^was made by him, who created man, and had a perfect knowledge of his nature and constitution. No manna fell on the Sabbath for the Hebrews when in the wilderness, and they were not allowed to gather it on that day. The inquiry has often been made, how were the Hebrews employed when they en- tered the land of promise on the weekly Sabbath ? Did they repair to the cities of the 62 HEBREW THEOCRACY. Levites for instruction ? Tiiis they could not do constantly on account of the distance of many families from them. Did the Levites on the Sabbath leave their cities and hold meetings in all parts of the land ? They were not required to do this, nor were the people required to assemble in any one place but three times a year. The public worship of God was where the ark was, and was con- ducted by the priests, who only had authority for the performance of this service. It seems then to follow, as the sabbath was a day of rest, and a day on which the Hebrews were not allowed to do any work — either them- selves or their cattle — that family instruction and worship were their employment. It was made the duty of parents to instruct and command their children on the Sabbath. As there was but one book of the law, to which no additions were made from year to year; and as this was the only book they had to read, or to remember, parents could without difRcnlty learn their own duty, and teach their children their duty. Children HEBREW THEOCRACY. 63 probably, were taught to read on the Fab- bath, that they might be able to read the law. The Levites, when they entered the land of promise, must have been very desir- ous of making the people acquainted with the law of God. It is supposed that they were a pious generation. They, probably, furnished the people with the copies of the scriptures they then had. Whether every family, or only every city, received a copy we know not. But in the faithful discharge of their duty the Levites must have felt much as christians now do, who are interest- ed in the circulation of the whole volume of revelation. How could parents obey the commands of God respecting their children, unless furnished with the means of knowinor his will? It certainly was the duty of the Levites to make known the law of God as extensively as possible. The successful dis- charge of their duty depended on this. And on their fidelity depended the peace, pros- perity and happiness of the nation. The rest of the Sabbath was an emblem 64 HEBREW THEOCRACY. of that rest which remaineth for the people of God. The rest of the Sabbath gives quietude to the mind, perplexed with the cares of the world, and directs the thoughts upward to God. The law of the Sabbath is a national law ; the token of a national covenant between God and all nations, which worship him. When the Hebrews carefully observed the Sabbath, they could with confidence look to God for the fulfilment of the promises of his covenant. As nations are composed of individuals, and as all men are required to observe one day in seven as a day of rest ; so nations are under obligations to devote one day in seven to worship God. Profanation of the Sabbath was under the Theocracy punishable with death. Every one that defileth it, saith the Lord, shall be put to death. For more than one hundred years our Puritan fathers were strict in the observance of the Sabbath. Even now, the habits they established, are in a good degree maintained. To them we HEBREW THEOCRACY. 65 are indebted for our knowledge of our rights and our free institutions. From them have gone forth to all parts of our country, friends of the Sabbath and of free institutions. We have reason to rejoice that christians feel their obligation strictly to observe this holy day. Under the Theocracy every seventh year was a sabbath of rest. The ground was not cultivated that year. It was a release from debts and from servitude. And if ye shall say, What shall we eat the seventh year? Behold, we shall not sow] nor gather in our increase. Then I will command my bless, ing upon you in the sixth yem\ and it shall bring forth fruit for three years and ye shall sow the eighth year ; and eat yet of old fruit until the ninth year; until her fruits come in ye shall eat of the old store. Leviticus 25: 20-22. The year of Jubilee was a year of rest and freedom, and a lively emblem of that rest which remaineth for the people of God. It is manifest that God had great regard 66 HEBKEW THEOCRACY. for the law of the Sabbath from the frequent repetition of it, and from the punishment of those, who violated it. Christianity has not repealed this law, but has added additional reasons for the careful observance of it. The day has been changed to commemorate the resting of the Son of God from his work on earth. The resting of God from the work of creation is not to be forgotten ; but the work of redemption is greater, and gives us the most glorious view of his perfections and purposes. FESTIVALS. There were three great rehgious festivals, which all the males were required yearly to attend at the sanctuary. They commemo- rated great events— the first, the protection of the Hebrews when the first born of Egypt were slain— the second, the giving of the law at mount Sinai— the third, the dwelling of the Hebrews in tents in the wilderness. At first view, the command of God requiring all the males to be present at the sanctuary three times a year may appear to be un- reasonable. But the ends to be answered were of great importance to the nation. The whole nation was interested in the events commemorated. These great national festi- vals were suited to keep the nation united under the same government and in the worship of the only living and true God. 68 HEBREW THEOCRACY. Their prosperity, peace, security and happi- ness depended on their wnion. Their meet- ing together three times a year made them ac- quainted with the condition of all the tribes, and promoted friendly intercourse. The influence of such large meetings is always powerful — in some respects in proportion to the number assembled. The orreater the number assembled for amusement, the great- er is the joy experienced or anticipated. As few of the Hebrews, probably, could read, and as they had but few books ; the informa- tion obtained at these meetings was of great value. That the Hebrews might attend these great meetings with cheerfulness, they were made attractive by being made festivals. The most important and chief subject of their meditations, when engaged in the worship of God on the Sabbath, and on every Sabbath, was the atonement typified by all the bloody sacrifices. This should be the great subject of our meditations, when engaged in the worship of God under the present dispensation. This was the view of HEBREW THEOCRACY. 69 the subject, entertained by the great apostle of the Gentiles, as is evident from the follow- ing passages. For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom; but we preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbhng-block, and unto the Greeks fool- ishness. For I determined not to know any thing among you, save Jesus Christ and him crucified. 1 Cor. 1: 22, 23, and 2: 2. Here it may be observed the first doctrines taught little children, when they witnessed the slaughter and sacrifices of innocent animals, were doctrines of grace. They were taught that they entered the world un- der the curse of the broken law, and could be justified only through faith in him, whom the sacrifices typified. The slaughter of innocent animals, and the burning of their flesh upon the altar, must have made deep impressions on the minds of the young — even very young children. To the inquiries, which it was natural for them to make, their parents could give proper answers, which the Spirit of God, did no doubt in many in- 70 HEBREW THEOCRACY. Stances sanctify and make effectual to the salvation of parents and children. The opinion has been expressed by some learned men that the law of Moses was with- out the sanction, derived from a considera- tion of the rewards and punishments of a future state. But it is manifest from the epistle to the Hebrews that the patriarchs had correct views of a future state. Heb. 11 : 9-lG. Job, who lived, probably, before the Hebrews left Egypt, expressed his belief in a future state, and he seemed to have no doubt respecting the subject. For 1 know, he said, that my Redeemer liveth, and that he shall stand at the latter day upon the earth. And though after my skin, worms destroy this body, yet in my flesh I shall see God. Job 19 : 25, 26. It can hardly be supposed that the pious were ignorant of the doctrine of a future state, before the establish- ment of the Hebrew Theocracy. So far as history gives us any information, we find that all nations had a belief in a future state, though the views of pagans were incorrect, HEBREW THEOCRACY. 71 and in their tendency pernicious. There seems to be no reason to doubt that the doc- trine of a future state was universally admit- ted from the earliest ages. A sense of ac- countability is common to all men — and the belief is common to all reflecting men, who are not influenced by false theories, that the unequal distribution of rewards and punish- ments in this world, will, under a just govern- ment, be followed in a future state by a just distribution. The moral law, by which the Hebrews obtained a knowledge of sin, taught them the necessity of a substitute in order to their justification and final salvation. The ceremonial law kept constantly before their mind the method adopted for their forgive- ness and reconciliation to the character of God. The appearance of angels and the token of the presence of the invisible God were proofs of the existence of another world. The Hebrews were a gross people, who were influenced very much by visible objects. Temporal rewards were so many pledges "72 HEBREW THEOCRACY. and visible proofs of the faithfulness of God, and pledges of the fulfilment of the promises ofjaeaven to all truly pious. So the punish- ments for disobedience were proofs of the truth of God, and of the certainty of the just punishment of the wicked in a future state. Do we not find under the present dispensa- tion that the ways of wisdom are ways of pleasantness — that righteousness exalteth a nation, and that sin is a reproach to any people? It is as really manifest now as it was under the former dispensation, that the blessing of God attends those, who fear and worship him, and that great temporal evils are the portion of immoral and wicked communities. The land of Canaan was an emblem and pledge of heaven, and the journey of the Hebrews through the wilder- ness a representation of their pilgrimage on the earth. They were taught the doc- trine of a future state in the same way in which they were taught all spiritual truths. Had they not believed in the doctrine of a future state, of what value would have been HEBREW THEOCRACY. 73 a future Messiah to those, who died before his advent? Was not a future Messiah the object of their faith ? Was it not the object of Abel's faith ? Abraliam beheved God and it was accounted to him for righteousness. The whole Hebrew economy directed the thoughts of its subjects to a future Messiah and a future state. The thought of annihila- tion or of ceasing to be at death, is so dread- ful, and there is such a desire of continued existence ; that every intimation from God of a future state must have been embraced and retained with unusual tenacity. The shortness and frailty of human life in the time of the patriarchs and afterward, in con- nexion with the Mosaic code, must have convinced the Hebrews that there is a future rest for the people of God, and a reward for the faithful — and also punishment for those, who either conceal their crimes from men, or who do not receive in this world that punishment they deserve. The moral law itself must have led to this conclusion. How could the Hebrews have had any satis- 74 HEBREW THEOCRACY. factory knowledge of the justice and truth of Godj m view of the imperfect execution of his laws in this world, without a belief in a future state? Promised rewards and threatened punish- ments are not always received in this world. How then can there be proof of the veracity of God, if there be not a future state? Did the patriarchs or their descendants, who died before the Hebrews obtained possession of the promised land, receive the blessings promised? How can we understand the fol- lowing passage, applicable to the posterity of Abraham, as well as to himself, for several generations? And he gave him none inherit- ance in it, no not so much as to set his foot on ; yet he promised that he would give it to him for a possession, and to liis seed after him, when as yet he had no child. Acts 7 : 5. Those who deny that the doctrine of a future state was taught by the Mosaic code, though they have made a great display of learning, seem to have taken only a very superficial view of the subject. They over- HEBREW THEOCRACY. 75 look the fact, that the doctrine of a future state was well known before the law was given by Moses, and that this doctrine was taught by types and emblems in the Hebrew ritual. Had not the Hebrews understood that their religion pointed to a future state, it would have appeared to them of but little value. The whole system was preparatory to a future state. Death was the con- sequence of sin. The pardon of sin and justification restored penitent transgressors to life. But as temporal death was the lot of the righteous as well as of the wicked, the former expected life beyond the grave. The civil and 'political condition of the Hebrews under the Theocracy. When God had made known to the priests and Levites their various duties, and had made ample provision for their support; the rest of the land was given to the remaining tribes, which received their portions by lot. When these tribes had received their por- tions, the families of which the^^ consisted 76 HEBREW THEOCRACY. received also by lot their portions. As God sustained the same relation to them all, it was his pleasure to treat them all alike. The division by lot was considered the most sat- isfactory method, where all had equal claims to that which was to be divided. The He- brews, by this division, became a nation of independent yeomen ; every family had land sufficient, by proper cultivation, for their support and free from debt. It was unalien- able. It was given to the family, including successive generations. Whatever any fam- ily did to increase the value of their inherit- ance was for their own benefit. Had all things been in common, those most disposed to labor, would have been unwilling to work for the idle. Besides, the idle are usually vicious and troublesome members of society. In all those countries, in which the lands are owned by the few, and the many are tenants or slaves, we find the former living in extravagance and luxury— despotic and oppressive, and the latter poor, unwilling to labor, except to escape the lash, or to pre- HEBKEW THEOCRACY. 77 vent starvation. The most industrious and virtuous people are tliose, who are the own- ers of the land they cultivate. And the more equally property is divided, the more diffi- cult it is for any ambitious person to oppress the people. The condition of the free states of this country, more nearly resembles than that of any other states of the earth, the con- dition of the Hebrews when first settled in Canaan. It was the will of God to preserve among the tribes and families 'of Israel as great a degree of equality as could be con- sistent with his wise purpose of government. He know some, by sickness and various calamities, which they could not foresee nor prevent, would become poor and need the aid of their more favored neighbors. God permitted such cases to occur no doubt, to try the feelings of the people. Knowing that the rich are disposed to take advantage of the necessitous, he made it their duty to relieve the distressed, and forbade them to receive usury for motiey lent. And if thy brother be waxen poor, and fallen in decay 78 HEBREW THEOCRACY. with thee; then thon shalt relieve him, yea, though he be a stranger, or a sojourner, that he may live with thee. Take thou no usury of him, nor increase; but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee. Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase. Lev. 25: 35-37. No doubt God so ordered the course of his providence, as to favor some, and to disappoint the hopes of oihers — that the feel- ings of the former might be tried by the wants of the latter. He gave to some more than they needed, that they might give to the suffering. It is now the duty of the rich to assist the poor, and to relieve the suffer- ing. The more eminent any are for piety; the more disposed they are to do it. As the Hebrews were not a commercial nation, the money of the more favored, if not lent, was unemployed. They lost nothing by not re- ceiving usury. Besides their prosperity re- sulted rather from the providence of God, than from their labor and good management : and to the same providence might be traced HEBREW THEOCRACY. 79 the calamities, by which others were made poor. The poor, if obliged to pay interest for the money borrowed, would have found it hardly possible ever to pay their debts. Being discouraged, they would not have attempted it. That God had particular regard for the poor is manifest from the repetition and variety of the laws, by which the rich were required to relieve them. If there be among you a poor man of one of thy brethren within any of thy gates, in thy land, which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shalt not harden thy heart, nor shut thy hand from thy poor brother. But thou shalt open thine hand wide unto him, and shalt surely lend him sufficient for his need, in that which he wanteth. Thou shalt surely give him, and thine heart shall not be grieved when thou givest unto him: because that for this thing the Lord thy God shall bless thee in all thy works, and in all that thou puttest thine hand unto. For the poor shall never cease out of the land : Therefore I command thee, saying, Thou shalt open thy 80 HEBREW THEOCRACY. hand wide nntothy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy in thy land. Dent. 15: 7-11. Those who employed laborers, were requir- ed to pay them at the close of the day. The wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning. Lev. 19 : 13. Every seventh year, those who conld not discharge their debts, were released. And the poor were allowed to gather on the seventh year the productions of the earth, not then cultivated. They were allowed the gleanings of the field and of the vintage. In addition to all these benevolent provisions for the poor, if any by sickness or any other calamity had been obliged to sell his inheritance, it was by the law of the Jubilee restored to him the fiftieth year. It was the will of God that the faults or calamities of parents, should not deprive their children of the inheritance intended for the latter, as well as the former. In this country provision is made for the poor by law. Besides the legal provision made for them much is done by voluntary contribu- tions. HEBREW THEOCRACY. 81 Various other laws manifest the kind feelings of the Hebrew Legislator. The fol- lowing may be mentioned: Ye shall not afflict any widow or fatherless child. Ex. 22 : 22. Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumbling block before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord. Lev. 19 : 14. He that stealeth a man and selleth him, or if he be found in his hand, h-e shall surely be put to death. Ex. 21 : 16. This doubtless has reference to the sale of a He- brew. The Hebrews were required to keep with care whatever was committed to them in trust — if any one dig a pit, he must cover it up lest any one should fall into it, if any man had an ox used to push and endan- ger the life of any one, the owner was re- quired to keep him in a secure place. If any one was injured by the carelessness or negligence of his neighbor, the neighbor was required to repair the injury. The thief was required to restore five oxen for an ox, and four sheep for a sheep stolen. Herds and flocks were the chief property of the Hebrews, who were an agricultural nation. 82 HEBREW THEOCRACY. There is one case worthy of particular notice. If thou at all take thy neighbor's raiment to pledge, thou shalt deliver it unto him by that the sun goetli down. For that is his covering only; it is his raiment for his skin : wherein shall he sleep? And it shall come to pass, when he crieth unto me, that 1 will hear, for I am gracious. Ex. 22: 26, 27. SLAVERY That God permitted slavery to exist un- der the Hebrew Theocracy is abundantly evident from the scriptures. But not any of the. Hebrews were slaves in the same sense, as those purchased of heathen nations. And those who purchased slaves of their pagan neighbors, were required to treat them with kindness. Those Hebrews, who sold themselves to discharge a debt, were free the seventh year, when debts were not exacted. They were like men among us, hired for a year or several years, to pay a debt, or for stipulated wages. And if thy brother that dwelleth by thee be waxen poor and be sold unto thee, thou shalt not compel him to serve as a bond servant, but as an hired servant; as a sojourner he shall be with thee and shall serve thee unto the year of Jubilee. 84 HEBREW THEOCRACY. Thou shalt not rule over him with rigor, but shalt fear the Lord. And if thy brother, a Hebrew man, or Hebrew woman, be sold unto thee, and serve six years, then in the seventh year thou shalt let him go free from thee. And when thou sendest him out free from thee, thou shalt not let him go away empty. Thou shalt furnish him liberally out of thy flock, and out of thy floor, and out of thy wine press : of that wherewith the Lord thy God hath blessed thee thou shalt give unto him. And also unto thy maid servants thou shalt do likewise. Deut. 15 : 12-14. The Hebrews were permitted to purchase slaves of their pagan neighbors. It was a kindness to those who were ofl^ered for sale, to be bought by Hebrew masters, who were not allowed to abuse them. Conquerors claimed the right to put to death, or to sell for slaves those whom they had made captives. Those they did not want themselves and could not sell, they probably put to death. To purchase them and to grant them relig- ious privileges were most benevolent acts. HEBREW THEOCRACY. 85 Some of our most philanthropic christians have been besonght by slaves to purchase them, offering to serve them for life rather than'be under the power of unfeeling masters. But the reasons have not been so urgent as tliose which influenced the Hebrews to pur- chase captives, who would have been put to death, or been treated with indescribable cruelty in pagan nations. For the Hebrews to purchase slaves of the heathen was to save them from death, or from cruel bondage and to ofive tliem a knowledo:e of the true God. Slaves were entitled to their true liberty, if treated, with harshness and cruelty. x'Vnd if a man smite the eye of his servant, or the eye of his maid, that it perish; he shall let him go free for his eye's sake. And if he smite out his servant's tooth, or his maid-servant's tooth ; he shall let him go free for his tooth's sake. Ex. 21 : 20, 27. The cruel treatment of slaves entitled them to their freedom, and made their masters liable to punishment. It has been observed that the Hebrews 86 HEBREW THEOCRACY. were not allowed to make slaves of any of their brethren ; because they were all the pecu- liar covenant people of God. For the same reason, as the middle wall of partition be- tween them and all other nations is now broken down, the laws by which the He- brews were governed should be extended to all nations. God has given no right to the Christian church to buy or sell slaves. Tn those peculiar cases, where Christians from the most benevolent motives purchase slaves; the latter should not be considered property, but rather as brethren ransomed and obliged to pay by their labor, only what has been paid for them. Christianity, wherever it has been estab- lished, tends to diminish by moral motives the evils, which exist in the world, and in various ways lo promote human happiness. It does not allow of violent and compulsory measures. It teaches us that all men by nature sustain the same relation to God, and by birth are free. Its tendency is to HEBREW THEOCRACY. 87 raise all men and women to their proper rank in the commnnity. When God delivered the Hebrews from Egyptian bondage, he did not lead them directly to the land of promise, which, on account of the distance they might have reached in a few days. They were ex- tremely ignorant and nnfit for self-govern- ment. Moses was for 40 years their teacher. They were obh'ged to be subject to severe discipline before they could, and were will- ing, to obey the laws of the Theocracy. Had they gone directly from the land of Egypt, or from mount Sinai to Canaan, and been established in that country without the instructions they received in the wilder- ness ; they would have been involved in perpetual wars, and would have been less happy than in bondage under a regular though arbitrary government. The judg- ments with which God visited his chosen people in the wilderness, were the most de- cisive proofs of their intractible dispositions. 88 HEBREW THEOCRACY. and of their unfitness for the peaceable en- joyment of the promised land. ISone but Caleb and Joshua of the men over twenty years of age, who came out of Egypt, not even Moses and Aaron, were permitted to enter Canaan. MILITARY ARRANGEMENTS, It was the will of God that his people should have no intercourse with corrupt and idolatrous nations. That they might not be corrupted it was his pleasure that they should be neither a commercial, nor a war. like nation. He allowed of no standing army, which would have been burthensome, and ruinous to the morals of the people. But he made it the duty of every man to unite with the rest in the defence of the na- tion, when invaded in any part. The per- son who had just married a wife, built a new house, or planted a vineyard, was excused for one year. They had a well regulated militia consisting of six hundred thousand when they entered the land of promise, able to overcome all opposed to them. As soon as an alarm was given they voluntarily, at 9 90 HEBREW THEOCRACY. their own expense, met their enemies. The wars of the nations of Europe and their standing armies, have loaded them with heavy debts they are unable to pay, multi- plied widows and orphans, and filled their hospitals with the sick and the maimed. Few would be disposed to become soldiers, if they had to support themselves. The Hebrews were protected by a special prov- idence, when absent from home, attending the great annual festivals. By the Mosaic law capital crimes were very summarily punished. This caused the government to be respected, and the laws to be obeyed. Because sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil. Ecles. 8: 11. "j'he more distinguished any man is for moral virtue or holiness, the greater is his abhorrence of capital offences, and the less is he disposed to delay the proper punishment of them. Had the punishment of capital offences been delayed under the Theocracy, the impres- HEBREW THEOCRACY. 91 sion would have been made on the commu- nity, that they were not viewed with very great abhorrence. It is the duty of rulers to manifest in the clearest light their hatred of capital offences. As they view crimes so the people will view them. And their feel- ings can be fully expressed only by the ex- ecution of the laws violated. The duty of rulers does not depend on the consequences of their acts ; for they cannot know what they will be till after their duty is performed. It is an old saying, duty is ours, events are the Lord's. The punishment of old offenders seldom reforms them. The delay of punishment diminishes its influence on the community. God has taught us what punishment the murderer ought to suffer. Whoso killelh any person, the murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of witne.^ses; but one witness shall not testify against any person to cause him to die. Moreover ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer. 92 HEBREW THEOCRACY. which is guilty of death ; but he shall surely be put to death.— Numb. 35 : 30, 31. The scriptures are very explicit on this subject. The command of God is many times repeat- ed, and the language is too simple to be mis- understood. The laws were severe against false wit- nesses. Any man proved to be a false wit- ness was made to suffer the same punishment to which the person accused was liable, if condemned by his false testimony. — Deut. 19: 16-19. This afforded great security to the innocent. Now as we are clearly taught that the murderer ought to suffer death — and as this is a requisition of the law of nature, which has never been repealed or modified, what right has man to change the penally? Is he wiser than God — a better friend of his fellow-creatures than God their Creator? The Hebrews had no prisons or dungeons. They were not allowed to make use of tortures or any cruel modes of punishment. The murderer was stoned or thrust through with the sword. The suffering was of short HEBREW THEOCRACY. 93 duration. It was the will of God that the murderer should be punished with death, and that those who executed the law should do it with seriousness and with tenderness of feeling. * There is no time when the law, which requires the murderer to be put to death, can so well be executed as soon after the perpetration of the dreadful deed. Then he has the liveliest sense of his guilt — is least disposed to excuse himself, and the commu- nity most loudly calls for his punishment. It appears to be the fact that those most op- posed to the execution of the cold-blooded murderer, have been most pleased with the slaughter of the Mexicans, and most disposed to justify it. They are not opposed to the death penalty, when it is viewed at a dis- tance, and from which they feel secure. But the consciousness that they have hatred in their hearts, which may sometime lead them to commit murder, makes them anxious for the abolition of the proper penalty. The murderer who kills his neighbor, made in 94 HEBREW THEOCRACY. the image of God, would, if he had the pow- er, murder God himself. The advocates of the abolition of capital punishment have the spirit of those, who said to Pilate, Release Barabbas and crucify Jesus. They had more sympathy for a murderer thau for the Son of God. Ample provision was made for such as were chargeable with justifiable homicide. Six cities of refuge were prepared for them to which they could make their escape — have a fair trial — and be legally acquitted. Till these cities were established, the man who had unintentionally killed his neighbor, was liable to be put to death by the avenger of blood, the near relative of the person killed. Capital punishments are less numerous in this country than in most other coun- tries — and less numerous than under the Hebrew Theocracy. Idolatry under the Theocracy, which was high treason, was punished with death. Visible idolatry does not exist among us. Great energy was ne- cessarily manifested in the establishment of HEBREW THEOCRACY. 96 the true religion, and a free government among the Hebrews, when they left Egypt, where they had been grievously oppressed and trodden under foot by cruel masters ; and where they had always lived among idolaters and the grossly immoral. One object of capital punishment under the former dispensation was to make known the nature and magnitude of the offense. The consequences had nothing to do with the obligation of magistrates or judges.* It should be the inquiry of every ruler, what does God require of me? Rom 13: Has he any where expressed his will.? Am I account- able to him and to the people over whom my authority extends? With respect to murder the mind of God has been fully made known. The law, by which rulers are re- quired to execute murderers, is not ceremo- nial, but it extends to all mankind, and has *The end of punishment is not the good of the individ- ual or the benefit of society, though both those ends may be secured. We must do what is right and what God re- quires of us ; whatever may be the consequences. 96 HEBREW THEOCRACY, ever been approved by the most intelligent and virtuous of men. Adultery was punish- able with death under the former dispensa- tion. And what injured husband or wife does not approve this law? Tt does not ap- pear that any were put to death for stealing or for any fraudulent transaction affecting property. It was however, lawful to kill a robber breaking into a house in the night. Such persons are supposed to be murderers. Many most distressing facts prove that the suspicion is not without foundation. If a man be found breaking up, and be smitten that he die, if the sun be not risen upon him, there shall no blood be shed for him. — Ex. 22: 1,2. One of the common objections to the Hebrew Theocracy has reference to the con- quest of Canaan. Had the seven devoted nations been destroyed by a deluge as were the inhabitants of the old world, or by a shower of fire and brimstone as were the in- habitants of Sodom and Gomorrah, or by an earthquake as were Korah and his company, HEBREW THEOCRACY. 97 no one would probably dare accuse God of injustice. Had tliey been destroyed by some mighty conqueror, as Nebuchadnezzar, Gen- gis Khan, or Julius Caesar, the instrument would have been condemned, and the prov- idence of God would ha'/e been overlooked. With respect to the Hebrews, it may be observed, they were very unwilling to fight against the devoted nations. In eleven days after they left mount ^inai they reached Kadesh Barnea, near the south of the prom- ised land: but because they were unwilling to go forward and take possession of it by force, according to the command of God, they were severely punished, being kept in the wilderness thirty-nine years, till all the six hundred thousand men of war, except Caleb and Joshua, perished. In destroying the seven devoted nations the Hebrews acted in obedience to the ex- press command of God. They only per- formed their duty. The nations destroyed were idolaters, and in their practice were ex- ceedingly corrupt. It was of great import- 98 HEBREW THEOCRACY. ance to the world that the true God should be distinguished from all false gods. Had the gods of the Canaanites been able to pro- tect them, they would not have left their votaries to perish, when they most needed help. It was perfectly just for the true God to dispossess the seven devoted nations of their country, and give it to his chosen people who delighted to worship him. The gener- ation that entered the land of promise, it is believed, were distinguished from any that preceded them for their piety. The com- plete destruction of the seven devoted nations and their idols, was designed to remove from the Hebrews every temptation to depart from the worship of the true God. The wisdom of God strikingly appears in destroy- ing the seven idolatrous and corrupt na- tions, rather by the instrumentality of the Hebrews, than by any calamity, not effected by human agency. Nothing could give the Hebrews a greater abhorrence of idolatry and a more affecting view of God's hatred HEBREW THEOCRACY. 99 of it and determination to punish it, than to be obliged, by the command of God, them- selves to destroy the devoted nations. The miracles God wrought in aid of the Hebrews convinced all the tribes that they]were doing his will. They were taught what they must expect, if they became idolaters. With respect to other surrounding nations, concerning which God gave the Hebrews directions ; if they accepted the offer of peace, the Hebrews were not allowed to fight against them. But if they refused and were disposed to commence battle with the He- brews, the latter were required to slay all the males and preserve the females. The consequence was that there was a great ac- cession of females to the Hebrew nation. It was, probably, customary and had been for conquerors to slay the males and to spare the females. This superabundance of females, produced by victories of one nation or tribe over another, occasioned, probably, the cus- toms of poligamy. In the case of the He- brews, who were desirous of increasing their 100 HEBREW THEOCRACY. number, that they might strengthen their nation, the children of the females, that were married to Hebrew husbands, were consid- ered Hebrews. But it was not lawful for the daughters of Israel to marry pagans. The nation would have in this way sustain- ed a loss. The husband gave character to his family. — Deut. 20 : The children born of Hebrew fathers were Hebrews — and the males were circumcised. As God had a right to command the Hebrews to kill the males of those nations that made war with them, so he had a right to give them the females for wives — and one of his promises was of a numerous seed. The circumstances, in which God per- mitted polygamy among the Hebrews, were in some respects not unhke the circumstan- ces, in which he allowed them to elect a king. Though he reproved them for their departure from him, yet the state of the tribes at the time seemed to demand some mighty leader, who could unite and com- mand the forces of the nation. HEBREW THEOCRACY. 101 Many other subjects might be noticed. But this would make the treatise of the author larger than he intended, and it was not his intention to give the history of the Hebrews after they were once established in the land of promise ; but only the principal features of their government, as it came from God. 10 CONCLUSION It was the will of God that the Theocracy of the Hebrews should continue in force till the advent of the promised Messiah, and till by his obedience and death he completed a righteousness, sufficient in value, for the whole human race. The law which he obeyed, and whose penalty he suffered as our substitute is the moral law. In this law there is no intimation of the forgiving love of God. By the deeds of this law there shall no flesh be justified. The ceremonial law, which made known to the Hebrews the only way of salvation, had particular refer- ence, to the moral law, and also to the promise made to Abraham, that in his seed all the families of the earth should be blessed. Now because the ceremonial law ceased to be necessary after the death of Christ, it by HEBREW THEOCRACY. 103 no means follows that the moral law, or the Abrahamic covenant ceased to be obligatory. Think not, said Christ to his disciples, that I am come to destroy the law or the proph- ets : I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, till heaven and earth pass, one jot, or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. — Mat. 5 : 18, 19. Do we then make void the law through faith, said the apostle.? God forbid : yea, we establish the law — Rom. 3: 31. And if ye be Christ's then are ye Abra- ham's seed, and heirs according to the prom- ise. — Gal. 3: 29. It is abundantly evident from the New Testament, that there has been no essential change since the advent of Christ, either in the moral law, or in the covenant with Abraham. They were both in full force before the Hebrews were' at mount Sinai. To enable the Hebrews the better to understand them was one object of tfje ceremonial law. The moral law holds an important place in the constitution of the United States— and in the constitution and 104 HEBREW THEOCRACY. code of laws of every particular state. That part of the national code of the Hebrews, which had respect to the rites they were re- quired to observe, was repealed, when the rites were rendered useless by the coming of Christ and the accomplishment of his work. This effected a great change in the government, by which they were delivered from a burden, which they had borne for a longtime; and with the light which burst on them, when the dispensation of the Spirit commenced, they might, had they not for- feited the favor of God, have been a free and an independent republic. When they had performed the service assigned them, and for which they had been abundantly rewarded by the peculiar priv- ileges they had enjoyed, the promised Mes- siah appeared, not to be the Savior of a par- ticular nation but of the world. Though the offer of life was first made to the Hebrews, even after they had crucified the Son of God; yet the terms of salvation were made the same for all mankind. This was the HEBREW THEOCRACY. lOo fulfilment of the promise made to Abraham, that in his seed all the families of the earth should be blessed. The continued fulfil- ment of a promise does not destroy its force. When the Hebrew ritual and the laws con- nected with it ceased to be observed by the church of God ; what do we see remaining? The moral law remains and is enforced by additional motives. Many families are add- ed to the visible kingdom of Christ, who was the promised seed of the patriarch Abraham. Gentiles were admitted to equal privileges with the Jews. What changes were wrought, it may be asked, in those pious families which had belonged to the Hebrew church by the new dispensation ? They had been justified by faith, and they could not be justified in any other way after Christ was crucified. The essentials of the character of a saint have been the same in every age. The moral law has ever been essentially the same in every nation, though the first day, which commemorates the resting of Christ from his 106 HEBREW THEOCRACY. work has been substituted for tlie seventh day of the week, because the work of re- demption is more glorious than the work of creation. When Christ was crucified the sacrifices, which pointed to his suffering and death, were no longer necessary. The clear light of the gospel changed that mode of in- struction, which was adopted under the former dispensation, to assist the Hebrews in their minority to understand spiritual thinsfs. The thing-s which had been taught by types and emblems were the realities, re- vealed under the new dispensation. The abuse of them led many to depend on their works for justification. But so simple are the ordinances of baptism and the Lord's supper, that merely the observance of them can hardly encourage any to rest on such a slender foundation his hope of salvation. Had there been no enlargement of privileges under the present dispensation ; we should conclude that infant males only ought to be baptized. But the tendency of cliristianity is to elevate females to a higher rank, than HEBREW THEOCRACY. 107 they enjoyed under the former dispensation— and the ordinance of baptism is as proper for females as for males. For the promise is unto you and to your children, said the apostle Peter, when he exhorted his Jewish brethren to repent and be baptised— and to all that are afar off, (to parents and children) even as many as the Lord our God shall call.— Acts 2 : 39. There is'neither Jew nor Greek, said the apostle Paul, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female ; for ye are all one (on the same level) in Christ. And if ye be Christ's, then ye are Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise. — Gal. 3: 28,29. FINIS.