BX 5133 .S22 1821 Sadleir, Francis, 1774-1851 Sermons and lectures Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/sermonslecturesOOsadl I SERMONS AND LECTURES. D. GRA1SBEKRY, PRINTER TO THE UNIVERSITY. TO HIS GRACE, THE MOST REVEREND FATHER IN 60D, THE RIGHT HONORABLE JOHN GEORGE, BY DIVINE PROVIDENCE LORD ARCHBISHOP OF DUBLIN, PRIMATE OF IRELAND, AND VISITOR OF TRINITY COLLEGE, DUBLIN, THESE SERMONS ARE MOST RESPECTFULLY DEDICATED, BY HIS GRACE'S MOST HUMBLE SERVANT, FRANCIS SADLEIR. ADVERTISEMENT. THE author of the following Discourses having been appointed to the Lectureship established by the Provost and Senior Fel- lows, under the will of Mrs. Anne Donnel- lan, is obliged, by one of the regulations of the establishment of the Done] lan Lec- tures, to publish four of his Lectures. He has taken the opportunity of publishing some of his other Sermons at the same time ; partly, for the purpose of filling up the vo- lume to a moderate size, and partly, to serve as a kind of preface to the Lectures; or, at vi least, to obviate any misconception of his principles, which the particular and con- tracted path of discussion, to which his subject naturally led him, and unavoidably confined him, might possibly give occa- sion to. SERMON I. I. Corinthtans, Chap. hi. Verse 3. For ye are yet carnal \-—for whereas there is among you envying, and strife, and divisions , arc ye not carnal, and walk as men ? THE Epistle, from whence I have taken my text, is addressed to the Church of God which was at Corinth, to them that were sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, who are after- wards described as coming behind in no gift, waiting for the coming of the Lord, who should confirm them blameless, that all things, whether present or to come, should be theirs, that they should be Christ's, even as Christ is God's. — And yet among a people thus highly characte- rised, there are said to be divisions ; and the vol. i. B 2 effects of these divisions are described to be such as to render them incapable of being addressed as spiritual, — incapable of being instructed by the Holy Spirit in the higher truths of the Gos- pel, or as we have it figuratively and beautifully expressed, being as yet but babes in Christ, to be fed with milk, and not with meat, forasmuch as they were unable to bear it, forasmuch as they were yet carnal.—" For whereas there is " among you envying, and strife, and divisions, " are ye not carnal, and walk as men ?" I have called your attention, my fellow Chris- tians, to this passage, because it shews us, that even among the sanctified of God, there may be divisions, that on the same true foundation, which is Christ Jesus, may superstructures somewhat varying from each other be raised ; but that if envyings and strife and factions arise therefrom, the effect is, not only to endanger the very sal- vation of the Teachers, but also to debase the spiritual character, to degrade the Christian rank, of the hearers, and render them, while they seek after the wisdom of man, foolishness before God. The consideration of the first of these, name- ly, the possibility of divisions among even the very elect, may lead us to be lenient to the misconceptions of our weaker brethren, who, 3 agreeing with us in the essentials of Christianity, appear to us to err on points of less vital im- portance.— And the consideration of the second, namely, the debasing effect of the envying and strife arising from these divisions, may tend to keep us from that anxiety, which has from age to age influenced too many in the Christian Church, the desire of being discovers and sup- porters of some doctrine, some meaning in the Holy Scriptures, which had before escaped the vulgar eye, — fancying that they were guides of the blind, and lights of them which sat in dark- ness. — It may preserve us from the eagerness for being leaders of sects, from devoting our talents and lives to the support of some mysti- cal speculation, some ceremonial observance, unto the obscuration of our Christian love, and peace, and joy, unto the neglect of the weigh- tier matters of the law, judgment, justice, and mercy. — And thirdly, my fellow Christians, the consideration of both may lead us to search the Scriptures, to seek out from some criterion be- tween those speculative doctrines which are es- sential, and indispensable to the Christian, and those which are of minor importance, — between those without which no man can come to God ; and those subjects of doubtful disputations to which the 1 weak in faith are desired, by the Apostle, not to be admitted. b 2 4 That there should be divisions respecting a system whose practical injunctions are intimately implicated with the passions and affections of the human heart, sometimes exciting, always controlling, and often directly opposing the warmest feelings and strongest propensities of our nature, whose speculative doctrines concern subjects far above the measure of our faculties, and which, until that which is perfect be come, we can know but in part, — respecting such a system, I say, it is no way surprising that there should be divisions ; that passion should not only influence the judgment, and diversify the opi- nions of mankind, but also that it should dis- proportion the importance which they attach to the several points of disagreement. — It is not sur- prising, that when we attempt to speculate be- vond the guidance of revelation, when we at- tempt to remove from our eyes the darkened glass by the protecting aid of which we imper- fectly behold the Glories of the spiritual world, we should be struck with mental blindness, and err and stumble as though we had been in utter darkness. In addition to these causes of dis- agreement which arise from the nature of the system, and the weakness of the creature to whom it is addressed, we must consider that being delivered to us in human language, an abundant source of divisions results from the imperfection of the vehicle of its communication. 5 I shall not delay you by expatiating on so trite a subject as the imperfection of human language, or the various possibilities of misunderstanding any communication conveyed from man to man. I shall only remark, that the more important the subject, the more apt are we to differ in our mode of understanding. Sovereigns, when speaking on the ordinary affairs of life, as a well known author observes, are easily understood ; but when speaking to their subjects in laws, must express themselves in volumes, and even so, can but partially remedy the uncertainty. — In matters of religion councils have sat, creeds have been devised, the utmost wisdom of man has been employed to obviate the possibility of misconception, and yet that wisdom has failed, those creeds have been variously interpreted, and the authority of those councils has been quoted by sects hostile to each other. — Even the articles of our own Church, which were formed by men whose zeal, whose integrity, whose tem- perance of mind, whose patience under perse- cution, whose boldness in Christ, strongly recall to our recollection the characters of those who first preached to mankind the glad tidings of Salvation, and scarcely leave in our minds a doubt, that they, as well as their great exam- ples, were under the immediate influence of the Holy Spirit ; having the advantage of the expe- rience of fifteen centuries, the knowledge of the e various misconceptions of Scripture, which f rom time to time had divided the Christian Church ; having before them the histories of Councils, the comments of the Fathers ; having every point of Christian doctrine, every text of Scrip- ture, analysed, as it were, in the furnace of con- tending opinions ; — even the articles of our own Church, I say, have been differently understood, though the imagination can scarcely conceive a more happy coincidence of integrity ability and opportunity, than that to which we owe their formation. It is however a consoling reflection, that most of the divisions of the Christian Church have been principally concerning matters of theoretical speculation, not concerning practical doctrine ; and only connected with it, as the opinions of the head must in many cases in- directly and accidentally influence the heart and conduct. — Each sect indeed rather strove, by the purity of their lives, to evince the su- periority of their principles.— To this however we have a few melancholy exceptions, sufficient to make us duly appreciate the importance of orthodoxy of tenet, and prevent us from being misled by the external professions or decorum of any incipient heresy, for the exceptions, to which I allude, although, they ended in moral depravity, began with apparent sanctity. It is moreover 7 worthy of remark, that an advantage of no in- considerable value has resulted to us from these divisions in the Christian Church, I mean that of having the Scriptures handed down to us free from variation, or corruption, or even from the suspicion of it, by the mutural watchfulness and jealousy of the contending parties. Another and frequent occasion of disagree- ment as to the meaning of the Scriptures, is the propensity which men have for busying them- selves about the religious prospects of others, rather than about their own. If the indi- vidual asks the question, what shall / do to be saved ? he can scarce open the Bible at hazard, but where he will find his answer written, so that he who runs may read. — If he asks what shall I believe so that I may come to God ? — Let him, having washed his hands in innocency, approach the altar of the Lord ; — let him with an honest and humble heart consult that Gospel, which was preached, not to the learned, not to the noble, but to the poor in spirit ; — let him do the will of the Father which is in Heaven, and he shall know of the doctrine whether it be of God. — What he understands let him believe ; what he does not, let him credit as a proposition of which, though true, he does not comprehend the terms j let him humbly wait for the en- lightening influence of the Holy Spirit, which 8 if it be requisite for his salvation, he undoubtedly will have. There is a distinction, and one which in these matters should be carefully re- collected, between believing a proposition to be true, and actually seeing the truth of it ; though for the latter it be absolutely requisite, that we perfectly understand the terms, it is not so for the former \ we may, without fully understand- ing it, believe it to be true, on the credit of the proposer. — If the individual, with this humble disposition of mind, seeking for a rule for his own conduct, and anxious for the regulation of his own faith, search the Holy Scriptures, in them will he find eternal life, and (to use the language of our Church) all that is requisite for salvation j — if he approach the rock of living waters, he shall not depart unrefreshed. But, if, satisfied with his own religious profici- ency, he proceed to enquire into the fate of others, from a wish perhaps to convince himself that he is not as other men are in these matters, if passing over the obvious doctrines of Chris- tianity, both practical and speculative, he pro- ceed to the exposition of curious questions re- specting the higher mysteries of our religion, if he proceed to explain what perhaps to mortal hearers cannot be fully explained, it is no wonder that he should involve himself in ambiguity and obscurity. — If he proceed to preach, not the Gospel, but these his own inventions,— not 9 Christ, but himself, unto the world, and to es- tablish a secondary kind of faith, namely an acquiescence in his own expositions, as requisite for salvation, it is no wonder if he meet with others, whom a similar line of enquiry may have led to different inventions, who will oppose him with emulation and strife and faction. — The ranks of the contending parties have been, and always will be, increased by the hypocritical, and the interested, who arrange themselves as their desires, their hopes, their fears, respecting worldly advantage and fame may influence them, who are ever most violent, whether it be in the defence of truth, or the support of error. — These help to give a body to their re- spective sects, and afford an example and pro- vocation to their sincere though deluded bre- thren, both to those who are speculatively right, and to those who are speculatively wrong, for the exercise of an unchristian spirit. Need I point out to you, my friends, the de- grading influence of these divisions j and the envy and emulation and strife and wrath which they produce are not the fruits of the Holy Spirit. — How strong, how powerful is the con- demnation of them by the Apostle from whom I have taken my text ; when he describes them as rendering the Corinthians incapable of re- ceiving that wisdom which the Holy Spirit 10 teacheth. — How apt are they to lead us from that humility, which ought to be the Chris- tian's great characteristic, and that practical piety, which evinces our devotion to God, by our benevolence to man, by doing justice, and loving mercy ! — There cannot be a greater obstacle to the progress of Christianity among the unconverted, than this spirit of conten- tion among professing Christians.— We are commanded to let our light shine before men, that they may see our good works, and glo- rify our Father which is in Heaven : but if we be full of division, and emulation, and strife, do we not present to the world darkness, and confusion, instead of light ? Do we not pre- sent to them the works of a hardened and un- changed heart, instead of the fruits of the spirit ? Do we not discredit the religion we profess, by exposing it to be considered as cherishing, or at least insufficient for coun- teracting, the natural malevolence, and des- perate wickedness, of the human heart ? Whence proceeds it that the purity and ex- cellence of the lives of the generality of Chris- tians bear so little proportion to the excellence and superiority of the faith which they pro- fess ? It is, because, that satisfied with pro- fession, satisfied with fancied accuracy of tenet, they neglect integrity of practice ; satis- 11 fied with the rectification of their intellect, they neglect the culture of their affections. — It is easier far to sway the opinions of others, than to govern our own hearts ; to arrange or support a system, to be good polemics, good cru- saders in the war of speculation, than to be good Christians ; and that easier task do too many prefer ; — forgetful of the fate of those who in the last day, from having persuaded themselves that they had prophesied and wrought wonderful works in the name of their Redeemer, shall claim,— -but unsuccessfully claim, his acceptance. — It is therefore well worth while to'seek for some discriminating line, between those doctrines of religion, which are essential to Christianity, which, except a man hold pure and undefiled, he cannot be saved, and those which are rather matters of philoso- phical speculation, than of religious import- ance. There is a philosophy of religion, as well as of other arts, and, as is the case with them, in some parts intimately connected with practical efficacy, and in others wandering widely from it into the mazes of theory, but with this difference, that, in other enquiries, our means of investigation are almost unlimited : — in the philosophy of religion, if we step beyond the bounds of revelation, beyond the actual text of Scripture, we find ourselves in a chaos of ignorance and obscurity ; we experience, 12 that the natural man receiveth not the things which are of God, save where the Spirit of God has moved on the face of the waters, and his illuminating word has brought forth life and light through the Gospel.— -Yes, my fellow Christians, the Scripture is the great criterion, by which we are to decide on the importance of any doctrine. Any thing not contained therein cannot he requisite for salvation : any thing not fully and clearly contained therein, so that the poor to whom the Gospel was preached could apprehend it, ought not to be a shiboleth of ex- clusion, in that flock which ought to be one, as it is under one Shepherd, and into which even the weak in faith are received.— If we search the Scriptures we shall find some of the speculative principles of religion ordained as the express means of salvation ; delivered with the accompanying declaration, that, except through them, we cannot come to God ; while others are alluded to, or indirectly implied, without any such sanction ; — and if we wish to enquire into their relative importance, we must take into consideration their probable influence on human conduct : nor should we make them a ground of separation from those who appear to us to err concerning them, except we can shew that their errors have corrupted, or most probably will corrupt, the heart, and debase the conduct ; until we can do that, though we 13 may shew them to be physically improbable, or critically erroneous, we cannot prove them to be dangerous heresies. — We should always recollect, that on points of religious difference, two sorts of arguments only are admissible ; the authority of the Scriptures, and the obvious influence of the tenet on practice : we cannot argue a priori, for we have not perfect ideas of the subjects concerned, and human authority, as being liable to error, though it may influence, should never decide us. — Of the admissible ar- guments, the authority of Scripture is leading and decisive ; — that from practical influence, is subsidiary and explanatory, furnishing us with a perpetual comment on the former, in the principle, that Scripture can have no meaning inconsistent with purity and charity ; can con- tain no doctrine, but what will tend to promote peace on earth, good will to man, and glory to God in the Highest. Were we to search the Scriptures, with this recollection in our minds, and pray for the aid of that Spirit whose fruits are love and peace and joy ; were we to enquire concerning every subject of dispute, whether the rightly under- standing it be expressly declared to be requisite for salvation, and if not, whether it be evidently influential on conduct, and postpone all such curious questions as are not so, until we found, 14 by the practical effect of the obvious doctrines of Christianity on our own lives, and those of our hearers, that neither they nor we were weak in faith, neither they unfit to receive, nor we unfit to examine the spiritual things of God we should be more ready to judge our own hearts, than to condemn the errors of others, we should feel that we may differ, without being divided, and that, if we be followers of Christ, we should love one another, preferring far above any superiority in doubtful disputations, far above any pharisaical spirit of separation, far above any imaginary exclusive sanctity, the unity of Christian spirit in the bond of Christian peace. May the Lord make you to increase in love one towards another, and towards all men j to the end that he may establish your hearts un- blameable in Holiness before God, even our Father, at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ with all his saints. SERMON II. Mark, xvi. — 15, l6. Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature ; he that believeth, and is bap- tised, shall be saved. To a man of common understanding who had never before heard of the Gospel of Christ, perhaps there could not be offered a more im- pressive predisposing argument for its reception, than the history of the command recorded in my text, and its astonishing fulfilment. It is now eighteen hundred years since an obscure company of ignorant mechanics, the followers of an humble individual, declared that he had appeared to them after his public execution, and had commanded them to preach his Gospel to every creature.— Could they have imagined an in- 16 junction more seemingly beyond their powers to comply with ? And yet, unlikely as it appeared, that Gospel has been preached more widely than the fame of the greatest conqueror, or the glory of the most mighty empire, has ever extended. — Kingdoms have risen and sunk and been for- gotten ; the triumphs of the hero and the labours of the philosopher have perished even from the page of memory ; but the history of the life and Crucifixion of the lowly Jesus has survived the wreck of ages ; the history of the Gospel's pro- gress has become a leading outline in the annals of civilized mankind ; the precepts which ac- companied it have supplied a foundation to the moralist, and a rule to the legislator. And yet this Gospel came not with wisdom of words, it possessed not the ornaments of style, to fix the admiration of the critic ; it recurred not to the strength of composition to kindle the fancy, or excite the passions in its cause ; like its author it was meek, and lowly, without comeliness, or beauty : — mankind had already histories of far more attractive interest, and moral codes of more imposing, more systematic, structure. To what then shall we attribute its progress ; to what can we attribute its progress, but to the power of God ? — In it has he placed the glory of the sun of righteousness ; — its line is gone out through all the earth, and its word to the ends of the world. Were we even to assert that the 17 entire series of human events, the various revo- lutions of power, the rise and fall of empires, seem to have been adapted by an overruling Providence, first to prepare the way for that Gospel, and afterwards to forward its progress, the proposition, so far from being indefensible or visionary, would be one which those who have taken the most comprehensive views of history would perhaps be the most ready to ad- mit. How interesting therefore must every enquiry concerning that Gospel be ? But there is one enquiry, namely, what that Gospel is ? wherein the preaching of it consists ? which is more than interesting, for it is important. To you, my fellow Christians, is the enquiry import- ant, to all of you, for all of you will be hearers of the Gospel, or what is presented to you under the name of the Gospel, is it most highly important to draw the line between what you are to receive as the voice of your God, and those oppositions of science falsely so called, which under the authority of that same voice, you are bound to avoid. Nor let me be deemed presumptuous in attempting the task ; daring indeed should I be did I do so relying on my own judgment or my own ingenuity ; impru- dent should I be did I rely on any human au- thority when I have the word of God within my reach — to that alone shall I look for truth, on that shall I depend lor information j — bear with vol. r. c me therefore my fellow Christians while I re- peat what my elders already know, and what many of my youngers I trust need only be re- minded of. And yet the enquiry is not super- fluous, for from the days of the Apostles to the present time, many have preached Christ of contention, many have preached not Christ but themselves, their own conceits, their own in- ventions to mankind — to those who fancied themselves the peculiar people of God, have the mercy and humility of the Gospel been a stumbling block ; to those who sought for the intricacies of philosophical theory, has its sim- plicity been foolishness — while to such as be- lieved and trusted, has it been the power of God unto salvation. Let us therefore with humility of mind ap- proach the sacred fountains of divine instruc- tion, and learn from thence what the Gospel is, and wherein the preaching of it consists, deter- mined to esteem nothing the Gospel but what the Scriptures describe as such, and mindful of the impressive denunciation of the Apostle, " though we or an angel from heaven preach any " other Gospel to you than that which we have " preached let him be accursed." The earliest account we meet with of the preaching of the Gospel is that by the heavenly \9 host to the Shepherds of Bethelhem, when the glory of the Lord shone around them, and the angel of the Lord said unto them, fear not, for behold I declare to you a Gospel of exceeding joy, which shall be to all people, for unto you is a Saviour born, which is Christ the Lord. This dawning of the day spring from on high was accompanied by the praises of those supe- rior beings who rejoice to behold the mystery of redemption — they sung the highest glory of their God, the message of his peace and good will to mankind. The description here given of this first declaration of the Gospel, or joyful tidings of Christ, naturally recalls to our me- mory the prophetic vision of the same glorious event. Bearing precisely the same meaning, and declaring precisely the same incident, the anticipation of the prophet being more detailed and copious may serve as an explanatory para- phrase on the song of angels. For unto us a Child is born ; unto us a Son is given ; and the Government shall be on his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God, the Everlasting Father, the Prince of peace. Oh ! Zion, thou that bringest the Gos- pel, get thee up into the high mountain ; oh ! Je- rusalem, thou that bringest the Gospel, lift up thy voice with strength, be not afraid ; say unto the cities of Judah, behold your God, for the C 2 20 Lord God shall come with power, his reward is with him, and his work is before him. Here, my fellow Christians, is the first outline of the Gospel. Its contents are simple, that a Saviour has come, that this Saviour is the Almighty God — that his coming is a cause of joy to all people, a declaration of peace and good will from God to mankind, that he bears with him the reward of righteousness, and has begun the work of salvation. — Strongly marked, and clear, and plain, so that he that runs may read, is this outline ; and yet most earnestly would I point it out to the attention of many who call themselves Christians. — Let those who deny that Christ is the Almighty God, let •those who would limit the joy of his coming to the few who agree with themselves in me- taphysical tenets, let such I say, consider well how they can adapt this outline to their re- spective systems. The next preaching of the Gospel is by the "Saviour himself. — We find him described by the Evangelists in his various addresses to his disciples, or to the people at large, as sometimes preaching, sometimes teaching, and these two seem to be distinct from each other.— When he taught he delivered moral precepts, when 21 lie preached he proclaimed facts ; — his teaching and preaching sometimes followed each other, but were never confounded. He is never said to have taught that the kingdom of God was at hand, nor to have taught the Gospel to the poor ; his teaching is always represented either as the authoritative delivery of moral precepts, or as appears in a few instances, the explication of these prophecies which related to the future events of his mission. When we find him de- scribed as preaching, he universally confines himself to the declaring, or proclaiming of certain facts certain joyful tidings. — In this, therefore, consisted the preaching of the Gospel as preached by the Redeemer himself. — Would we know what that Gospel was, we have only to look to the Scriptures for what those facts were. It is no cunningly devised system of un- intelligible speculations, no dream of mysticism, no ingenious deduction of abstract metaphysi- cal reasoning — but a plain and clear message of peace and reconciliation from God to man, a sim- ple publication of interesting facts, easy to be apprehended, and joyful to those who received it. One fact was that the kingdom of Heaven was at hand, the meaning of which appears to be that God was about to assume a controlling influence over the human mind, was about to establish his kingdom in the hearts of his chosen, that to those who love the Redeemer, would 22 the Father come, and take up his abode with them, that he would put his law into their inward parts, taking from them their heart of stone, and giving them an heart of flesh. — Connected with this Christ also preached repentance, pro- claimed the joyful tidings that this change of heart was about to be effected. — I need not, I believe, prove to my present audience that scriptural repentance signifies a change of mind — I shall only remark that where mere sorrow for sin is meant, a different word, as in the case of Judas, is used to express it. — This change of mind, being the work of God, is a matter of fact, the declaration of it is the intelligence of a joyful occurrence, and therefore an appro- priate part of the preaching of the Gospel, of the proclamation of joyful tidings. — But while it is wholly the work of God, it is a work in which though man cannot originally assist, he must afterwards cooperate — though he cannot in any degree produce the effect, he must join in the exertion ; though God works in him both to will and to do, yet he commands him also to work out his own salvation ; — repentance there- fore, or change of mind, becomes an object of teaching and exhortation, in this point of view, as it is of preaching, when we consider it merely with reference to God. — I mention this to pre- vent you from thinking that preaching and 23 teaching are confounded with each other, when we find repentance the subject of both. Another fact, another part of the glad tidings which Christ proclaimed to the world, is that the Father hath given him authority to execute judgment because he is the Son of Man, that he has committed all judgment to the Son, because he had taken our nature upon him, that we have an high priest who is capable of being touched with the feeling of our in- firmities — to this joyful intelligence he superadds another, that he is our mediator with God — the door, the way by which we can approach the Father, that he is the light of the world, the life and the truth, that he has given himself for the life of the world, that he has given him- self a ransom for many, and that whosoever believeth on him hath everlasting lite ; — this declaration of these joyful facts he crowns by that of the dignity of the ransom, though he had not assumed the external characteristics of Deity, but had taken on him the form of a servant, and had made himself of no reputation. — Yet, in the midst of his humiliation he de- clares himself one with the Father ; I and the Father am one ; he that hath seen me hath seen him that sent me ; I am in the Father and the Father in me ; — I am hath sent you, said the God of Abraham to Moses, from the burning 24 bush — before Abraham was I am, said God manifested in the flesh, to his disciples. Is not this a glorious Gospel, my fellow Christians ? is not this Gospel of peace, this Gospel of the grace of God, this Gospel of jour salvation tidings of exceeding joy to all people ? — Ordained, as the law was of old, by angels in the hand of a Mediator, it was a light to lighten the Gentiles, as well as the glory of the people Israel. It proclaimed joyful tidings to the poor, it healed the broken hearted, it proclaimed deliverance to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, it set at liberty the wounded, and published the acceptable year of the Lord ; ; — in it, as in the blessed messenger of it's covenant, the numerous families of the earth were blessed. The poor in spirit were blessed, for the reign of God was established within them, the mourners were comforted, those who lmngred and thirsted after righteous- ness were filled, the merciful obtained mercy, and the pure in heart beheld their God. Such is the outline of the Gospel as preached by him who declared, that for the purpose of preaching it had he come forth from God. — The other facts of the Gospel, namely, the actual sacrifice of the Redeemer, his resurrec- tion, and the pouring out of the Spirit on all 25 flesh, though he had adverted to them as future events, cannot with propriety be considered as part of his preaching, nor are they mentioned as such by the Evangelists. — We must consider them under the head of the Gospel as preached by the Apostles. As the Apostles had been sent before by their blessed master, during his ministry, to preach the Gospel of the kingdom to the surrounding cities, so after his resurrection did he command them to publish that same Gospel, with its ad- ditional facts, which at once completed and confirmed it, to all the nations of the earth — they were to evince the divinity of their mis- sion, by miraculous powers ; they were to bear testimony to their sincerity, by martyrdom. — Let no one be surprised that miracles and mar- tyrdom should have been exclusively appropri- ated to the first age of Christianity. Miracles constantly repeated cease to be considered as such, lose the effect which at first they are cal- culated to produce, therefore in order that they should operate towards the establishment of the Gospel, they must have had a period. — Mar- tyrdoms also are only efficient to prove the truth of any fact, when they are those of the individuals who actually witnessed that fact, the voluntary death of any other person in testimony of his sincerity, proves only that the same evi- 26 dence which is presented to us, has influenced him to conviction. — Christian martyrdom must therefore naturally have ceased with those who beheld the Redeemer's death, and witnessed his resurrection. — Thus exclusively authorized by miracles, and sealed with the blood of its preachers, the Gospel of the Apostles comes to us with the most powerful evidence that any publication of facts is capable of having. In the treatises which the Evangelists have left us we find combined with the account of the teach- ing and other discourses of our Saviour, the de- tail of those facts which form that Gospel which they were commanded to preach to the world;— in them therefore are we to look for the facts, in them therefore are we to look for the Gospel. — In the Acts of the Apostles are we to look for their manner of preaching the Gospel. In their Epistles are we to look for their comments on this Gospel, the inferences which they made from this Gospel, the teaching which they grounded on this Gospel, the teaching which they had of God. The pursuit of this part of the subject, too important to be hurried over, would carry me beyond the time usually allotted to discourses from this place. I shall therefore defer it to some other opportunity. Suffer me for the pre- sent to call your attention to a consideration re- 27 suiting from the nature of the Gospel. — The Gospel is the message of love from God to man, the tidings of reconciliation, the promise of the presence of the Holy Spirit — it is to be pub- lished, it is to be perpetuated, not merely so as to be capable of being occasionally referred to by the eye of historic curiosity, but so as to be ever present to our hearts. — The memory of the love of God should, like God himself, be about our path, and about our bed, and accompany us in all our ways ; — to effect this has the Sacra- ment of the Lord's Supper been instituted, a rite which at once conveys and cherishes the me- mory of him that loved us, and is the outward and visible sign of an inward and spiritual gift. The last act of our Redeemer was to command, to entreat his Disciples, to continue this rite in remembrance of him ; he has sanctioned it by no ordinary declaration, " except ye eat the " flesh of the Son of Man, and drink his blood, " ye have no life in you ; he that eateth my " flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me " and I in him. "-—Will you, my fellow Chris- tians, neglect this offered means of perpetuating in your hearts the memory of your Redeemer's love ; will you neglect the gift of life, the con- dition, the symbol, the vehicle of spiritual bles- sing — will you account the blood of Christ's atonement an unholy thing, by turning your backs on his gracious invitation ? You have 28 heard from the table of the Lord, that on the approaching Sabbath the Sacrament of the Lord's Supper will be there administered. — Let me entreat you not to be absent yourselves from it. — Let me entreat you to avail yourselves of every opportunity of partaking of it.— -Do not misunderstand the denunciation of Scripture, that whoso eateth and drinketh the same un- worthily, eateth and drinketh his own condem- nation. There is a difference between being worthy to eat thereof, and eating worthily. Worthily! my fellow Christians ! who is worthy? who can be worthy ? we are not worthy so much as to gather up the crumbs under thy table, but thou art the same Lord, whose property is al- ways to have mercy. To communicate wor- thily, requires not so much previous sanctity, as present disposition of mind, not the expe- rience of justification, not the confidence of righteousness, but the desire of pardon. Had the Bread of Life been presented to the Pub- lican, though perhaps previously as unworthy as the Pharisee, or as we, he would have re- ceived the same not unworthily. If you receive it with reverence, with humility, with faith, with an earnest anxiety to be freed from the dominion of sin, and presenting yourselves, your souls and bodies to be a reasonable, holy, and lively sacrifice to your God, you will re- ceive the same not unworthily. If you have 29 malice in your heart, and are determined to cherish it, then indeed come not to that ta- ble — but then also abstain from imprecating the wrath of God on your heads, by beseeching him to pardon you in the same manner as you for- give those that trespass against you. If you have impurity in your hearts, and are deter- mined to cling to it — then indeed come not to that table — but then T tremble for your danger — you live in the midst of death — thousands fall beside you, and ten thousands at your right hand — perhaps this night may your soul be re- quired of you ; and if you are not fit to appear at the table of the Lord, oh ! how shall you ap- pear before his judgment seat. But, my fellow Christians, I have far differ- ent hopes of you. In your tender years the glow of anger, 1 would willingly persuade myself, has never yet kindled into permanent malice — the depravity of nature has not yet been strength- ened by habitual indulgence — the seeds of im- purity have not as yet hopelessly rooted them- selves in your hearts. Come, before the world, before pleasure, before sin have sealed you as their servants, and offer to your God the morn- ing sacrifice of your life, the grateful incense of your youth. Come and partake of the offered means of cherishing the love of God in your hearts. Beneath its sacred influence, shall you 30 be safe from future pollution, under its guid- ance shall you tread securely the furnance of temptation, and enter into the joy of your Lord —who shall pluck you out of his hand ? who shall separate you from the love of God ? May he accept and preserve you— and to his holy name be glory now and for ever. SERMON III. Mark, xvi. — 15, 16. Go ye into all the world, and preach the Gospel to every creature ; he that believeth and is bap- tised shall be saved. IT has been imagined I fear, by many, that ab- stract and abstruse speculations concerning the nature of God and man form a principal part of the Gospel, and constitute what have been de- nominated the higher doctrines of Christianity. To the value and merits of this opinion I was anxious to direct your investigation, and there- fore on a former occasion, I called your atten- tion to the enquiry ; " what the Gospel is, and wherein the preaching of it consists." It ap- peared to me expedient to propose and partly 32 to enter on the subject then, but to defer the prosecution of it both that we might have suf- ficient opportunity for its full discussion, and also that, in the intervening time, you might search the Scriptures, satisfy yourselves whe- ther what I had advanced was authorised, and be ready to appreciate the observations which I shall now submit to you. In the preaching of the Gospel antecedent to the sacrifice of the Redeemer, as described by the Evangelists, we find merely a proclama- tion of certain joyful tidings, we find facts, and nothing but facts, speculative tenets are never described as the object of it. So exclusively is the word which has been rendered " Preaching the Gospel," confined to this meaning, that it is never applied even to the publication of the moral precepts which accompanied and were grounded on that Gospel ; this was denominated teaching, and its object was called doctrine. I am aware that the word doctrine has, by com- .mon use, acquired a very different, or at least a much more general signification ; but we are at present concerned only with its Scriptural meaning, and I believe if you search the Bible you will find that its general import is moral precept, that in all passages it may signify that, and in almost all can signify nothing else. S3 Tin* teaching of morality, this doctrine which was according to Godliness, accompanied and was grounded for its authority on the Gospel. Combined with the preaching of the Gospel it formed the substance of the various addresses of our Saviour whether to the people, or to his disciples. We never find him entering into de- tails of speculative theory, or adverting to those points of doubtful disputation, which have since so widely polluted the peace and purity of the Christian Church. Even with respect to the glorious events which he announced, we never find him at- tempting to explain how these things could be. He declared that he who is one with the Fa- ther, who is before Abraham was, had been sent by the Father to make atonement for our sins ; but never even hints at an explanation of how he could at once be both God and man, nor of the manner in which his death could be efficacious for washing us from our sins, or his resurrection for ensuring our justification. Per- haps we may even justly doubt whether an ex-, plication would have been possible to human hearers. If every explanation of any fact be but the referring it to some general law, any fact which is single and exclusively of its own kind, cannot be explained. We find him declaring the relations of God VOL. I. D 34 to man, which we can understand ; not the ab- solute natures of either, which are beyond the measure of our faculties. He declares even these, not in abstract propositions, but by the publication of facts, which expressed and result- ed from them, and on these relations, on the Gospel of these facts, he grounds not theory but precept. " The kingdom of God is at hand, be ye " therefore changed in your minds; bring forth" (as the Baptist had before exhorted) " fruits " meet for a changed heart — " Be ye perfect, " even as your Father which is in heaven is per- " feet." He proclaims the love of God to man, and apeals to the hearts, not the heads of his hear- ers ; requires the exercise of the affections, not the labour of the intellect. By the Gospel of the remission of sins he awakens the hope of the sinner ; by the Gospel of a change of heart, he inspires him with confidence ; by the Gospel of the " Kingdom of God, which is within us," and the promise of redemption, which he was about to accomplish, he excites his gratitude ; and by a teaching, which was with authority, by a word, which came with power, he points to obedience as the appropriate expression of that faith which was the gift of God, that love which the Holy Spirit had shed abroad into the hearts of the redeemed. — " If ye love me, keep my c< commandments." 35 Conformable to this, as we may naturally sup- pose they should have been, were the preach- ing and the teaching of the Apostles. Their mission was to teach and to baptise all nations, to preach and to testify, by the highest proof of persuasion and sincerity that man can give, the facts asserted in the Gospel. It is a great mis- take to confound the martyrdoms of these first preachers of Christianity with the voluntary deaths of its professors in after ages.—" Mar- tyrdom," says a learned author, influenced by this misconception, " is no proof ot the truth of any system, it only evinces the sincerity of its reception by the martyr." True, if by " system" be meant system of tenets ; but it is perhaps the strongest possible proof of the truth of testimony as to tact, and its appropri- ate province in the Christian dispensation is to witness, not opinions, but facts, not a system of speculation, but the Gospel of our redemption ; — and there is reason to believe that every wit- ness of the facts which constituted that Gospel sealed his testimony with his blood. Examine the addresses of these witnesses to the people recorded in the Acts of the Apos- tles, and you will find that they consist of the proclamation of certain facts, and the proposi- tion of a certain doctrine, a certain teaching sanctioned hytho, authority which Utey Itei " 36 from the existence of* those facts. They first proclaimed the coming, the death, the resur- rection of the Redeemer, the pouring forth of the promised Spirit, and thence they deduced the authority of command ; " Be ye therefore " changed in your mind, and be converted from " the evil of your ways." They first declared faith in the Redeemer to be the means, and the only means, of salvation from the power and conse- quences of sin, and then they reasoned of righ- teousness, temperance, and judgment to come. They first preached the kingdom of God, pro- claimed the redemption, testified the influence of the Spirit, and then taught the things con- cerning the love and obedience which are due to the Lord Jesus Christ. As in the Acts of the Apostles we find an account of some of the addresses of those mes- sengers of God to the Jews and Gentiles at large ; so in their Epistles do we possess a re- cord of their manner of renewing the memory of the Gospel which had been preached, and the doctrine which had been taught. We may con- sider them as a comment on that Gospel and doctrine, and a pattern of what would have been their preaching and teaching to Churches already established, had they been present. In them therefore, if the understanding of mys- teries be of essential importance, we would na- 37 turally expect to find their explication. If spe- culative tenets constitute the higher and more perfect doctrines of Christianity, we might ex- pect to find them at least proposed, and expli- citly detailed in these Epistles. If without the reception of them we cannot come to God, surely they would have been clearly imparted to those who were already grounded in the faith, and had already received the Holy Spirit. We cannot suppose that they would have been left to the research of future professors, to deduce them, by the assistance of metaphysical system, from the occasional allusions to a knowledge too wonderful for man, which occur in Scripture, without being declared to be either parts of the Gospel, or connected with the command- ment. That such allusions should occur was both na- tural and necessary. The Apostles had to com- bat the prejudices of the Jew, and to meet the argument of the Greek ; they had to guard the faith of their infant Churches pure and unde- filed by the mystic figments of a luxuriant fan- cy, the theories of a vain philosophy, and the oppositions of science, falsely so called. We find Saint Paul disputing with the Grecians, reasoning with, and mightily convincing the Jews, persuading the things concerning the kingdom of God. In such contests as these, 3S objections would naturally be offered, and ar- guments advanced, connected with speculative opinions ; they were therefore to be answered by a declaration of the truth on these points, how obscure and incomprehensible soever that truth might be. In some instances, it is possi- ble the objectors might have been silenced by appealing to their own received opinions, with- out by any means establishing the importance of those opinions. Hence, as we may observe, the Epistles ap- pear to contain three distinct topics, a repeti- tion of the facts of the Gospel, a delivery of precepts to direct the exertion of the love, the grateful wish for conformity and obedience, which faith in those facts produced, and the Holy Spirit rendered perfect j and thirdly, a disclosure of certain divine truths sufficient to obviate the objections, and remove the doubts whether of the Judaizing Christian, to whom the humility and simplicity of the Gospel were still a stumbling block, or of the Gentile convert, who being weak in faith, spoiled through phi- losophy and vain deceit after the rudiments of the world, hesitated in his belief, because he could not fathom all the counsels of God, and, like Thomas, would not believe, except he had actual perception of every thing connected with his redemption. These truths, however, arc only used for their appropriate purpose ; — they 39 arc not declared to be part of the Gospel. — The Gospel had been preached before they were disclosed, and was in itself sufficient for salva- tion. The reception of them is not declared to be the means of rendering us righteous here, and causing us to be accounted so hereafter ; And this, my fellow Christians, is the great cha- racteristic oj the Gospel. Are we then to esteem them as of little im- portance ? By no means. — They have been de- livered by the voice of inspiration, and are therefore true and worthy to be received.— They enable us .to give a reason of the hope which is in us, and are therefore valuable. But they are to be used for this purpose with meek- ness and fear. They concern subjects above the measure of our faculties ; they have not been fully explained, therefore beyond the let- ter of the inspired authority, we must not go. We must not make them the grounds of meta- physical theory ; we must not even deduce mo- ral doctrine from them, for the Gospel is of that the only sure foundation. We must not re- quire that others should agree with us in our arbitrary exposition of them. He who suffers theoretical zeal to produce in him unchristian feelings, or unchristian conduct towards his bro- ther, excludes, not his imagined victim, but himself from the flock of his Redeemer. — 40 Though we have the knowledge of all myste- ries, and have not charity, we are nothing. On such points, my fellow Christians, it is safest not to speculate at all. They may be con- sidered as a kind of philosophy connected with religion, but it is a philosophy which should not be pursued. And if we do pursue it, we should not be surprised if we differ from each other in our deductions, or even in our manner of un- derstanding the principles themselves, nor should we make those differences the ground of separa- tion. We should remember that these truths have been advanced for a particular purpose, to si- lence objections, and for this, and only for this, should they be used. We must receive and use them, but we must give them their due estima- tion ; true, but not practically operative, sub- sidary, not principal, and necessary only where the question has been started. The Gospel and the precept, the word and the commandment, that which was preached and that whicli was taught are the essentials ; theoretical opinions are only subordinate. Philosophy is not reli- gion, but to walk humbly with our God. The- ry is not religion, but to visit the widow and the fatherless in their affliction. Rectitude of speculation is not religion, but to lay hold on the hope which is set before us, the salvation which is offered to us, and thereby to keep our- 41 selves unspotted from the world. He that would substitute an imagined accuracy of mystic tenets, for that living faith in Jesus, which is unto obe- dience, would give to those who seek for bread, a stone, and to those who require meat, a scorpion. And yet, in all ages of the Church, has the anxiety for forming a perfect system of religious philosophy been prevalent, and mankind seem not to have been aware, that imperfect as are our ideas on all things, those connected with reli. gious theory are, and from their nature must be, of all the most imperfect. We ought to re- collect that the Scriptures contain every thing which is necessary for salvation, and therefore if completion of system were requisite, in them should we have found it ; we should have seen not as through a glass darkly, but know as we are known. Nothing can form an essential part of the Christians faith but what has been preached by Christ and his Apostles as the Gospel j nothing can be of indispensable importance to him but what has been used as the foundation of their moral doctrine ; and for this purpose we know that nothing has been used, but what had been previously preached as the Gospel. When therefore the question arises respecting the re- ception of any thing as a part of religious faith, we are_to consider, has it been declared in Scripture as part of the joyful tidings of our sal- vation j has it been used by the Apostles to ex- cite our hearts to obedience. If it has not, we may safely suspend our investigation as to its meaning and consequences ; and should it be merely a human deduction, asserted to follow from Scripture, we may even suspend our as- sent as to its truth. It may be true, it may be ingenious, it may be sublime, it may be philo- sophy, but it is not religion. Had the propensity for making sacred things the subjects of theoretical research been produc- tive only of theoretical obscurity and error, the evil would have been comparatively of little importance. But alas! it has not merely de- ceived the Church in their expectations of spi- ritual food, it has not merely given them that which was useless, but also that which was de- structive. Whence have arisen those various divisions which have from time to time dis- graced the Church, banished the unity of the spirit, and broken the bond of peace. The facts which constitute the Gospel are easy to be ap- prehended, the precepts grounded thereon are clear, all who deserve the name of Christians agree on them. What therefore divides them ? Matters of doubtful disputation. Oh my fellow Christians are we not carnal ? while one says I am Paul, and another I am of Apollos, are we 43 not carnal, and walk as men ? On the facts of the Gospel, and on the precepts of the doctrine, all who even call themselves Christians would have agreed, had they not grasped after a wisdom too wonderful for man, had they not, like the first who fell, thirsted for a knowledge which had not been vouchsafed by God. Proposing questions respecting the nature of the Beings concerned in the facts of the Gospel, because they could not adapt their systems to the Scrip- ture, they forced the Scripture to their systems. Resorting to the arbitrary supposition of figu- rative language, and where that failed relying on erroneous criticism, and even voluntary false- hood, putting away a good conscience, they make shipwreck of their faith. Christ had declared himself both God and Man, an assertion which contained not even the appearance of contradiction, and was there- fore easily apprehended, and which was testi- fied in such a manner as to be easily received on the credit of the proposer, who felt the affec- tions and weaknesses of the flesh, and yet com- manded the powers of nature, who lived and died as man, wrought miracles and triumphed over death as God. Cerinthus, however, could not conceive the manner in which the divine and human natures could be united, that is he could find no other fact with which to classify 44 it. Therefore, with the Gospel in his hands, he denied that Christ was man, denied that Christ had suffered in the flesh. Socinus could not satisfy himself on the same point of speculation, he therefore had recourse to the beginning of John's Gospel to prove that Christ was not God —that God had not visited his people. And his followers at this day, with the pretension of sincerity and simplicity, profess that they can find in Scripture no assertion of his divinity. — The Arian imagined that by wisdom he could know his God, and where he found the Scrip- ture inconsistent with his inventions, explained away its meaning, and denied the equality of the persons of Jehovah. The Antinomian could not reconcile the necessity of the moral law to his ideas of election, and therefore denied its obligation. The Gnostic of the first age, and the mystic of later periods, imagined that ob- scurity could consecrate the dreams of a dis- ordered fancy, and converted into one vast sys- tem of barren mystery that living word of God which is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for instruction in righteousness, that the man of God may be perfectly furnished into all good works. Sects became as numerous as tenets, and all in their zeal for what God had not re- vealed, forgot that brotherly love which he had commanded. 45 Such, my fellow Christians, have been the fruits of a theorising spirit in religion. Be as- sured there never was a more fatal mistake, than to imagine that contemplation is piety, or that speculative tenets can form the higher doctrines of Christianity. I again repeat to you, on the authority of the Bible, that the doctrines of the Apostles were moral precepts, and their higher doctrines nothing but a more full and impres- sive disclosure of those rules of obedience, strong in hope, grounded in faith, rooted in brotherly love. Great was faith, great was hope, but greater was charity. Let us, says the Apostle to the Hebrews, laying by the account of the beginning of Christ, and of the precepts of baptism, and the impo- sition of hands, go on to perfection. And what is this perfection ? What is this higher doctrine of Christianity ? After having declared to them, after having preached to them that Jesus ever liveth to make intercession for us, that he is a mediator of a better covenant, established on better promises, a covenant which puts the law of God into the minds of his people, writes it in their hearts, and purges their conscience from dead works to serve the living God, that unto them that look for him shall he appear the se- cond time without sin unto salvation, he draws from thence these practical conclusions, he grounds thereon this perfection of doctrine, " let us therefore holding fast the profession of our faith, provoke one another to love and good works. Follow peace and holiness, look- ing diligently, lest any man fall from the grace of God." And then he proceeds to deliver com- prehensive precepts of charity, purity, obedience to superiors, and thanksgiving to God, and beseeches the God of peace to make them per- fect in every good work to do his will, working in them that which is well pleasing in his sight. This, my fellow Christians, is the perfection of teaching ; these, according to Saint Paul, are the higher doctrines of Christianity. Re- pentance from dead works is the first precept of that teaching which is of God ; works meet for repentance are the more advanced. No obscure mysticism, — no barren speculation, — no root of bitterness and division, but holiness and joy and peace in the Lord ; good will to mankind in its progress ; glory to God in its perfection. Bearing in our minds these ideas of the preaching and teaching of Christ and his Apostles, we immediately see the unreasonable- ness of those religious parties who mutually condemn each other, one for enthusiasm, in con- stantly preaching to the people the sufferings and death and promises of our Redeemer, and 47 dwelling, without change or variety, on the facts which constitute the Gospel of our Redemp- tion ; and the other for want of saving know- ledge, in delivering moral sermons, which their adversaries venture to stigmatise as unscriptural doctrine. To preach the Gospel, my fellow Christians, is not enthusiasm. To teach morality is not un- scriptural. Both should be combined, as by the Apostles. In their writings we find frequent repetitions of the Gospel, and frequent exhorta- tions to holiness. Every revival of the memory of our redemption is followed by a call to righeousness of life ; every call to righeousness is preceeded by a recapitulation of the redeem- ing mercies of God. The Gospel is the soul, the precepts are the organs of our religion. Excluded from the precept, the Gospel wants its means of operation ; cut oft' from the Gospel the precept is dead. Would any one conversant in the Scripture blame a minister of the Gospel for preaching that Christ died for our sins, and rose again for our justification, that he is of God, made unto us wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctific^'on, and redemption ; that he has entered by his blood into the holy of holies, and has sent us another comforter, who shall abide with us for 48 ever. But shall we preach this constantly ? Shall we dwell on it ? Will not the repetition be wearisome to our hearers ? — Constantly, my fellow Christians, always, and ever. Write it upon thine heart ; bind it for :i sign upon thine hand ; let it be for frontlets between thine eyes ; let is be seen, like the blood of the Pas- cal Lamb, on thy posts, and on thy doors ; it is the power of God unto salvation. Though the Gospel be the same, though Jesus Christ be the same, to the sinner it appears in lights per- petually changing. Every departure from the evil of our ways, e\ery fluctuation of hope, every encrease of faith presents to us our Re- deemer under some new and endearing aspect, and gives to his Gospel the charm of variety, the fascination of newly awakened interest. And again, my friends, who shall blame a teacher of nations for following the example of the Apostles, and instructing them in righteous- ness, for calling on them to walk as becometh those those who have put on Christ Jesus. ? If indeed he ground his teaching on expe- diency ; on any natural obligation to virtue ; on any moral fitness of things ; on any founda- tion save Christ Jesus ; then indeed he becomes a mere moral essayist. If he call his hearers first to good works, as if change of mind and 49 faith would follow,as if works would render them worthy of the grace of God, then indeed he hews out cisterns which will hold no water ; he builds his church on the sand ; he raises an edifice, not on the rock of ages, not on the sure foun- dation. No, my fellow Christians, the teaching which is of God rests on the Gospel which is of God ; its aids are not the cold, the slow decisions of the head, but the energetic, the irresistible feelings of the heart. He that rightly divideth the word first preacheth Christ, then teacheth righteousness. This is the word which cometh with power ; the word at which Felix trembled ; to which the sinner bows ; which the savage receives with joy ; which the ignorant and those who were out of the way feel to be efficacious ; a light to lighten the nations, and the glory of God's chosen people. VOL, I. SERMON IV I. Corinthians, ix. — 16. For necessity is laid upon me ; yea, 'woe is unto me if I preach not the Gospel. IT would justly be deemed superfluous, my fellow Christians, were I to enter on a detailed proof to you, that the same necessity which was laid on Paul is also laid on every Minister of the Gospel. It is a truth which the faithful servant of Christ, who trusts that he is called to the ministry by the Holy Spirit, is ever mindful of, which the sloth- ful and negligent who have drawn nigh to God with their lips, though their hearts are far from him, cannot but admit. General however as may be its admission, when we come to inquire 51 into its meaning, and the manner in which it should be complied with, there may be, and I fear have been, considerable differences of opi- nion. — Many have thought that the Gospel is a system of speculative truth, deducible by human reason from certain principles detailed in the Bible ; but while all are agreed on the prin- ciples, while all admit the divine authority of the Scriptures, the attempt to raise a structure thereon, to raise by human power a structure which should reach the Heavens, has divided presumptuous man into a thousand languages. A conviction that these divisions among pro- fessing Christians present an obstacle of fre- quent and fatal operation to the progress of true religion in the hearts of mankind, furnishing to those who are without objections from our want of unanimity, and supplying those who are within with shadows, which they may mistake for the substance of Christianity — a conviction that completion of system is not essential, that we may be wise unto salvation without being wise beyond that which is written ; led me to investigate the value of the points on which Christians have been divided, and to call your attention, as I did on a former occasion, to the enquiry what the Gospel really is and wherein the preaching of it really consists. I en- deavoured to point out to you that the Scripture e 2 52 describes the preaching of it as the declaration of the joyful tidings of our redemption, and that it also indicates another office of the Mi- nisters of Christ, namely, to be teachers of righteousness, but that in neither capacity, whe- ther as preachers, or teachers, was it their office to search into the deep things of God farther than he has revealed them. I endeavoured to impress on you, that neither the knowledge of what was not contained in Scripture, nor the explication of what was farther than it was there explained could be essential to salvation ; in short, that Christianity is not an understand- ing with the head unto abstract truth, but a believing with the heart unto righteousness. In these former addresses to you I confined myself to a general manner of expression in treating the subject ; I asserted that facts form the Gos- pel, the belief of which was indispensable to salvation, and that speculations form the philo- sophy of religion, subsidiary indeed, but not essential, useful while we confine ourselves to the sure word of inspiration, but dangerous when we venture beyond it. I shall at present enter into a more particular disquisition, and as I fear my distinction between facts and specu- lations may be liable to be misconceived, I shall attempt to draw the line between what we are to consider as facts and what as speculations ; and again, with respect to the latter, between what are of scriptural authority and what of only human invention. The Gospel, in the scriptural sense of the word, appears to signify the glorious tidings of our redemption, and as such to consist of the declaration of certain events already accom- plished, and also that of other events, the ac- complishment of which is promised to the peo- ple of God, Those already accomplished are the coming, the death, the resurrection of the Saviour; — those promised are the salvation, the justification, the sanctification of those who come to God through Christ, the imputation of his righteousness to them, the pouring forth of the Holy Spirit into the hearts of the re- deemed, and the establishment of the kingdom of God within them. Perhaps these latter may appear to some to be of the nature of matters of speculation, but they are by no means to be confounded with such ; they are events, they are facts, they are actions of God on his people, which imply a particular and definite time of existence and accomplishment. By speculations on the other hand I under- stand either the explication of the manner of the Gospel facts, and these explications may be 54 either scriptural, or human ; or secondly, pro- positions respecting the nature and state of man, the nature and counsels of God, which have not been preached as the Gospel, but have been mentioned in answering objections j or thirdly, similar propositions supposed to be colligible from Scripture. With respect to the events, the tidings of which as accomplished, and the promises of which as future, constitute the Gospel of our salvation, they are as to fact easy to be ap- prehended, and therefore neither need those who preach hesitate as to what they shall declare, nor those who hear as to what they shall receive. — And indeed all who sincerely receive the Scriptures as the word of God, all who deserve the name of Christians do both receive and preach the occurrence of those events : all are agreed that the word was made flesh and dwelt among us, that he died for our sins, and rose again for our justification ; that he has promised to his chosen the continued influence of the Holy Spirit ; that he has pro- mised to those who love the Son the presence of the Father, the power to become the children of God. What they differ concerning is the manner of these events, not perceiving that the explication of the manner is by no means essential to our believing the fact. Though the 55 manner be not explained to us, though we be unable even to conjecture it ourselves, still if the authority for the occurrence of the fact be sufficient, we may and must receive it. Every day's intercourse with the world presents to us innumerable instances of our believing facts on authority, though we be totally ignorant of the manner of them, and of our considering such belief as full and sufficient for all its purposes. We believe that water has been frozen, that organized beings have advanced to maturity, without being able even to conjecture, much less to know the manner of the process. — Who would be so absurd as to tell the mariner that his belief in his tables was insufficient, because he knew not the manner of the force which retained the stars in their places, or that his compass would fail to direct him on the ocean, because he could not explain the reason of its tendency ?— And shall we tell the humble Christian who believes what his God has de- clared to him, that his faith is insufficient, except he understand the manner of the facts which are its objects ? — Shall we tell him that hope and trust and confidence in his Saviour cannot lead him to God except he understand the manner of his new birth, that the outstretched hand of his Redeemer cannot save him except he know how that hand sustains him ? 56 It is remarkable that with respect to the accomplished events which are declared in the Gospel, there is scarce even a hint given towards the explication of their manner. — Though we are called on to believe that God was manifested in the flesh, and took our nature upon him, yet there is not the slightest intimation given of the mode of union. Though we are called on to trust in the atonement by the blood of Christ for the remission of our sins j yet we find no description of the manner in which that atonement effected our reconciliation with God, or remedied the corruption of our nature : the silence on these points, while it bears testimony that the Scripture is not the work of an en- thusiastic or vain imagination, suggests also the conclusion that if God has left us in ignorance concerning these most prominent objects of our faith, the understanding of others which are less so cannot be of indispensible importance. With respect however to the promised events the case is different. While those which have been already accomplished, and in the pro- duction of which man was by no means con- cerned, have been left unexplained, those which were promised, and in which he was to be con- cerned, have had their manner and their pro- gress clearly and fully detailed. — How sublime how interesting soever an explication of the 57 manner of the former might have been, yet, resting solely in theory, implicating no duty, incapable of adding ought to that love of God which a belief of the facts themselves must produce, it was not requisite, and therefore has not been given ; — but in the promised events, the justification of the people of God, where man was called on to be an agent, to be a worker out of his own salvation while the spirit wrought in him both to will and to do j — where he was commanded to look diligently lest he should fall from the grace of God, where he was enjoined to make his calling and election sure, there the path of the progress is marked out and the manner of the operation accurately described. It was necessary that man should know to whom he should fly for refuge, on whom he should rely for support, from whom he should expect salvation ; it was requisite that he should know the means, the condition, the evidences of his justification.— Christ is pointed to as the Saviour, the Holy Spirit, as the sustaining Com- forter ; and faith, as the instrument or means by which we are raised from the bondage of sin to the glorious liberty of the sons of God.— Obedience is represented as at once the condi- tion and the effect of salvation, holinesss of life I 58 at once the evidence and the fruit of justifi- cation. When the sinner feels his own corruption, when he experiences within himself the sources of misery even in this life, and the daily increase of these causes excites a fearful looking out for that which is to come; — had the way of sal- vation been undescribed he might have trusted to his own powers of amendment, depending on his reason for the regulation of his heart, and the power of his will to choose that which reason represented as good ; he might have fancied that years of self righteousness were not only possible but requisite before he could presume to hope for grace from the throne of mercy. — The Scriptures, however, at once re- move this groundless apprehension, and obviate these deceitful misconceptions, by describing the Saviour as the door, the way by which we must come to God; he who died for our sins rose again for our justification. By the atonement are we freed from the corruption of our nature, from the dominion of sin in this life, and its wages in that which is to come. By the imputation of his righteousness, who is of God, made unto us righteousness and sanctification and redemp. tion, has he given to us the right to become the sons of God.— Observe here, my fellow Chris- tians, a distinction corresponding with that 59 which I have before remarked ; the effect of the sacrifice of Christ appears to be double, atone- ment and justification ; the results of the former exclusively respecting God are like the atone- ment itself merely stated as to fact, not ex- plained as to manner, while with respect to jus- tification, the resurrection of Christ is de- scribed to be the object of faith, the foundation of our confidence, the evidence of our Re- deemer's power and truth. — If Christ be not risen, then is our preaching vain and your faith is vain ; — this faith is described to be the instru- ment used in our salvation, by faith are ye saved; love is pointed to as the means by which faith produces its effects, and that effect is stated to be obedience. — I am aware that jus- tification by faith only has appeared to some absurd and indefensible, and to others a tenet not admitting of explication, but to be con- sidered as one of the mysteries of our religion. These opinions perhaps may have had one com- mon origin, namely, a misconception of the meaning of some scriptural terms. — "Being jus- tified" has been by some considered to mean merely the being acquitted, and thereby ex- empted from punishment at the final judgment ; salvation has been thought to be merely a state of future enjoyment and glory consequent on that acquittal, and faith only a belief of the veracity of the authors of the Bible as his- 60 torians, and an acquiescence in their wisdom as moralists how such a faith could produce such justification, or why it should procure such a reward would be indeed a mystery.— If we search the Scriptures, however, we shall find that the faith, the justification, and salvation there men- tioned, are not such as these, and that their mutual relation is not mysterious. The best way of ascertaining the signification in which any word has been used by any author or set of authors, who were employed on the same subject with the same views, and were contemporary and conversant with each other, is to examine all the passages of their works, in which the term under its several varieties of inflection may occur, and to seek what is the general meaning which will satisfy the sense in all. — Let us apply this criterion to the term salvation in its scriptural use. — On a comparison of the passages we shall find that in some few it is referred to something future, but in the great majority to something present. They therefore who would consider it as im- plying only preservation from present evil, would be more near its real meaning than those who confine it to a future state of blessedness. — But may there not be a meaning which will satisfy both ? — Suppose we consider it as signi- fying preservation from the power of the wicked 61 one, from the influence of the tempter, from the dominion of sin ; — this meaning will answer in all the passages in which it is spoken of as present, and also in all those in which it is al- luded to as future — And indeed these two branches of its meaning are most intimately connected; — there cannot be a surer ground for hope of future salvation than present sal- vation from the misery and guilt of sin. — If God preserves us from crime in this world, no doubt he will preserve us from its effects and wages in that which is to come ; — if he endows us with the graces of the Spirit here, no doubt he will call us to glory and immortality here- after. Being justified, in like manner, is not confined to the future, it is frequently, I had almost said constantly, spoken of as something present, and would appear to mean our being made and accounted righteous, our being made and ac- counted conformable to the image of Christ, our being made and accounted conformable to the law of God in our hearts, not merely at the final judgment, but also here, not merely here but also at the final judgment, when the secrets of all hearts shall be made known. We are by no means to separate righteousness from justification, they are both in some places where they occur only different renderings of 62 the same word, and in others, of words imme- diately derived from the same root. Perhaps this difference of translation may have given occasion to these pernicious errors which have resulted from that separation ; and it is remark- able that the original Greek, in which the re- lation of the terms is unavoidably obvious, was not the authority referred to, nor indeed un- derstood by at least some of the chief sup- porters of the Antinomian errors respecting justification. Yet surely it is most absurd and unscriptural to imagine that God will declare us righteous without having made us so, or that he will make us so without afterwards declaring and treating us as such. Faith, from a like comparison of passages, appears to mean a belief of the scriptural cha- racter and office of Christ, a conviction of his truth and authority, and a confident reliance on his love and mercy, casting all our care on him who has so cared for us. Now, my fellow Christians, is the connection between faith and justification left by the in- spired writers an object of mystery ? Is it an incomprehensible tenet which we cannot receive without the exertion of a blind credulity ? — Is it inconceivable that the Almighty, who applies to the production of every effect its most appro- 63 priate cause, who gives to the mighty masses which compose the universe, a simple and uni- form tendency to preserve them in their courses, who regulates his living creation by instincts proportioned to their scale of being, Is it in- conceivable that he should guide man, whom he had made but little lower than the Angels, to his perfection and happiness, by the strongest of feelings and the most rational of moral motives ?— " By faith are ye saved, and that not " of yourselves, it is the gift of God." — This passage has been said of late to be of doubtful meaning. — Of doubtful construction it may be, but not of doubtful meaning, for both con- structions have one and the same import, that God is the author of our salvation, and that faith is the instrument by which he effects it. Does pleasure present itself and tempt us to forget our God ? He that believes that Christ died to purify to himself a people zealous of good works, will not yield to the solicitation. Does passion add its overwhelming strength to temptation? Faith has excited a stronger feeling in the Christian's heart, and presents to him a way whereby he may escape. Does fear of temporal evil assail his integrity ? Faith worketh by love, and from that love neither tribulation nor anguish, nor famine, nor the sword can separate the believer. Does a sense of un- worthiness and inability discourage our efforts ? 64 He that believes that the strength of God is made perfect in our weakness, that our suffi- ciency is of God will not despair, will not be remiss — he that believes himself called to righ- teousness and glory, will press forward for the prize of his high calling. If, as some philosophers have imagined, the will is necessarily determined by the appear- ance of the slightest preponderance of reason, what must the effect be, when reason and duty, gratitude and love, hope and fear, am- bition and self anxiety arising from faith as from their source, present themselves.— The Spirit of God aiding our unbelief, putting into our hearts holy desires, good counsels, just works, instructing us in all righteousness, and causing us to know that the doctrine is of God ? Thus are we saved from sin by faith j thus are we made righteous ; thus are we led from strength to strength, by him who is the author and finisher of our faith ; thus do we take on us the light burden, the easy yoke of Christ ; thus are we conformed to his image, called, justified, glorified. Now may the God of all grace, who hath called us to his eternal glory by Christ Jesus, make you perfect, stablish, strengthen, settle you. — To him be glory and dominion, for ever and ever. Amen. SERMON V. Luke, xvii. — 20, 21. And when he was demanded of the Pharisees when the kingdom of God should come, he ati- swered them and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with observation ; neither shall they say, lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. THROUGHOUT the several discourses of our blessed Saviour, which are recorded by the Evangelists, we find frequent mention of the kingdom of God and the kingdom of heaven, expressions which seem to be used indiscrimi- nately for each other. At the commencement of his ministry we find him declaring, as the vol. r. F 66 Baptist had shortly before, that the kingdom of heaven was at hand ; — in almost every address to the people, every private conference with his disciples, he introduces the same subject, sometimes proclaiming the glad tidings of its approach, sometimes alluding to its mysteries, or describing its nature in figurative language and apposite parables : " the kingdom of hea- " ven is like a grain of mustard seed, — like a " piece of leaven, — a pearl of great price, — a " field containing a hidden treasure, — a blade " of corn which riseth up from the seed we " know not how — again, we find him declar- ing it to be the inheritance of those who suffer persecution for righteousness sake, who do the will of the Father, and stating also, that to preach these glad tidings was the great object of his mission; we afterwards find him asserting, that there were some of those who heard him who should not taste of death, until they be- held the kingdom of God established ; that it was a kingdom not of this world, into which a man cannot enter except he be born again, and at the same time holding it up to his disciples, as the object of their pursuit, their hopes, and assured expectations. — " But rather seek ye the *' kingdom of God j" — and again — " Fear not " little flock, it is your Father's good pleasure '* to give you the kingdom." 67 The meaning of an expression so frequently the subject of our Saviour's preaching must, to the Christian, be an object of most interesting enquiry. — It is the great promise of God to his faithful children, the object of our prayers when we address the throne of mercy. — Is it not most important to us to know what is that which has been promised to us, and what is that for the approach of which we are taught to sup- plicate, to enter into which we are directed to strive, and for the sake of which there is no man who hath left this world's dearest posses- sions or fondest ties, who shall not receive ma- nifold more in this present time, and in the world to come life everlasting. To these cir- cumstances, which shew the importance of the enquiry, we may I believe add a farther, which is that the misunderstanding of the term has, I fear, been the secret ground work of some dan- gerous errors and unchristian dissensions. It appears to have in different places three several meanings, which although intimately connected, are yet distinguishable from each other. In some passages it appears to mean a place or state of happiness, where we shall enjoy that exceeding weight of bliss, and glory, such as eye hath not seen, nor hath it entered into the f 2 68 heart of man to conceive, which the All-merci- ful hath prepared for those who love him ; — that state which is elsewhere alluded to by entering into the joy of the Lord, or by entering into life. — In this sense it appears to have been used where our Saviour tells the Jews, that, " many " shall come from the east, and from the west, " and shall sit down with Abraham, and Isaac, " and Jacob, in the kingdom of heaven." — And again, — that, " he that is least in the kingdom " of heaven is greater than John the Baptist." And again, where he tells the mother of Zebe- dee's children, that, " to sit on his right hand " and on his left in his kingdom shall be theirs " for whom it is prepared by the Father." And again,— where, in his description of the last great day, he represents himself as addressing his chosen flock, " come ye blessed of my Fa- ** ther, inherit the kingdom prepared for you " before the foundations of the world" — these are, I believe, the principal, if not the only pas- sages in which the terms " kingdom of heaven " or kingdom of God" are used in this signifi- cation. There is another meaning in which we some- times find it used, and that is God's method of dealing with his creatures. Thus where the kingdom of heaven is likened unto a certain king that would take an account of his servants ; 69 again, where it likened to the householder who went out early to hire labourers ; again, where it is likened unto a certain king which made a marriage for his son ; again, where it is likened unto ten virgins ; — in all these it obviously means God's method of dealing with his crea- tures, his requiring the existence and cultiva- tion of certain dispositions of mind in them, his gratuitously bestowing mercy upon them,, not according to their own measure or estimate of their works j but according to his good and gracious pleasure ; — his indiscriminately calling all unto salvation, and yet chastising both those who neglect his merciful invitation, and also those, who being constrained to obey it, after- wards behave unworthy of the vocation where- with they are called. In all these passages I say the terms kingdom of God, evidently sig- nifies the manner, the method, the system of God's government and treatment of his rati- onal, his moral creatures. And, if I mistake not, these are the only passages in which the terms in question arc used in this meaning. I now come to the third, and by much the most frequent signification of tiie expression, — namely, the influential dominion of God over the inward man, the powerful efficacy of the Spirit of Christ in our hearts, whereby we are inspired with the devoted, the dutiful affection 70 of children towards our heavenly Parent, — the controlling presence of the Holy Spirit within us, residing faith sovereign sanctity in his tem- ple, subjugating our passions, ruling our affec- tions, originating every good counsel, matur- ing every holy desire, perfecting every good work, leading captive what before had been in captivity unto sin, and inspiring us with that love which is the fulfilling of the law, and that faith which is unto obedience. Such is the king- dom of God for which we pray that it may come on earth j such is the kingdom of God which, not only shall be, — but even is the inheritance of those who suffer persecution for righteous- ness sake, under the salutary government of which we cannot come except we be born again, except we become as little children in unpre- suming humility and affectionate obedience. — Such is the kingdom of God which our Saviour declared was at hand, and which is now near unto every one of us, if so be, that we have not received the grace of God in vain. Degraded by original sin, man had been driven not only from Paradise, but even from the presence of God. — Left to that fancied wis- dom which he had chosen in preference to obe- dience, to that knowledge of good and evil which he had purchased at the price of his faith in God, he was surrendered to the coun- 71 sels of a vain imagination, the guidance of a deserted heart, the lusts of a depraved nature, until at length when the time which seemed good unto the wisdom of God was fulfilled, the crooked ways were made straight, an highway was prepared through the wilderness for the Lord to visit his people, to declare deliverance unto the captives, recovering of sight unto the blind, and to set at liberty them that were bruised. And when Christ by his blood had made atonement for sin, and opened unto us the holy of holies, re-admitted us unto the presence of God, then was the dominion of God over the human heart reassumed ; then was the great work of our redemption from the dominion of sin, (as our Saviour declared on the cross) then was it finished j man was reconciled to God, rendered capable of loving him, rendered ca- pable of being temples of the Holy Ghost, and to those who love Christ and keep his command- ments, God has graciously promised that he will love them, and come unto them, and take up his abode with them. This reign of God over the hearts of his be- loved, over the wills of his chosen, is that king- dom which is like a grain of mustard seed, ori- ginating indeed from a small beginning, but encreasing gradually by the bounty of heaven into grandeur, beauty, and protection. — This 72 is that harvest which springeth up, man cannot discover how. This is that hidden treasure, that pearl of great price, for which the merchant might well give all that he is worth. — Shall I remind you of more passages in which the king- dom of God is described in this sense ? — I would have to bring you through almost all the several discourses of our blessed Saviour, for there is scarcely one of them in which it is not al- luded to. Nor is this meaning of the kingdom of God unconnected with the former. God's govern- ment of the hearts which he has chosen, may be considered as a part of bis treatment of man- kind in general ; which is the second of the meanings I have enumerated. — And it is re- lated to the first of them, namely, the everlast- ing bliss and glory which God has promised to them that love him, not only as being the means which the Almighty uses to fit us for it, but also as being actually a part of the happiness which he declares to be the everlasting re- ward of faith unto obedience ; " behold, saith " the Lord, I am thy exceeding great reward." But although we observe that the three mean- ings of the terms in question are thus closely re- lated, yet we must carefully remember that they are not to be confounded, that we are not every where to understand them in the first meaning, 73 or consider them as exclusively referring to a future state of glory beyond the grave. A mis- take which I fear has been too generally preva- lent. — From hence seem to have originated many errors and dissensions respecting the necessity of good works. — To our inheriting the kingdom of God in the first sense, they undoubtedly are absolutely requisite, for at the final judgment every man shall be judged according to his works ; they that have done well shall go into life everlasting, and they that have done ill into everlasting fire.-— But to our entering into the kingdom of God in the third sense, to our re- ceiving the easy yoke, the light burden of Christ, to our hearts and affections coming un- der the government of God, good works cannot be requisite, for they cannot be antecedent, they cannot be causes, for they are the effects, the fruits of the reign of God within us. There is a salvation from the power of the wicked one on this side the grave, there is a blessedness in following the guidance of the love of God, even antecedent to our future glorified justification, and inferior to the joys of Heaven, perhaps only because less perfect. And of these, abstinence from sin and following after active righteous- ness, cannot in propriety of language be said to be the causes, because they are the things themselves. — They do indeed strengthen our habits, enlarge our faith, encrease our love, 74 perfect our obedience, but they are the means used for these purposes, not by ourselves, — but by God.— They are the gratuitous gift of God, and the instruments used by him in our rege- neration. — Our part is only the unmeritorious one of receiving, of not resisting our own ad- vantage, of suffering ourselves to be led by the Holy Spirit to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling.— In the last sense of the kingdom of God, I say it is an impropriety of language to state, that good works are requi- site, — so that the two propositions respecting the necessity of good works for our entering into the kingdom of God, which when we take the terms in either sense exclusively, are direct contradictions, are when we understand them in the different meanings which they appear to bear in Scripture, not only perfectly reconcile- able, but even closely connected, and entirely consonant with each other. But, my fellow Christians, I had a more im- portant motive in entering on this subject, than merely to remark on these speculative errors.— My motive was, that I might take occasion to press upon you the conviction of what you are, and what you ought to be. — Bought with a price, — redeemed from being the servants of sin, — vindicated out of the house of bondage into the glorious liberty of the sons of God,,— 75 taken out of that deserted state, in which the world could not by means of wisdom know their God, — having the vail removed from your hearts, and being thus re-admitted to the influ- ential presence of the Almighty, — having the reign of God renewed within you— the revival of which the Father had promised by his Pro- phets, the Son had purchased through his blood, the Comforter is constantly employed in pro- moting and perfecting. — As at the production of the material world, the spirit of God diffused itself throughout the vast abyss, so in the cre- ation of the spiritual kingdom of Christ, is he poured into the void and formless heart, that light and life may spring forth at the creative word of Jesus. — Being, my fellow Christians, in such a progress of redemption and reconcilia- tion, having the glad tidings declared to us that we are the subjects of such a kingdom, shall we become rebels against God ? Shall we quench the influences of the Holy Spirit within us ? Shall we procrastinate our obedience, to some more convenient opportunity ? But what are these influences of which we speak ? — Open your Bibles, and you will find what are the fruits of the spirit. Love, Joy, Peace, Long suffering, Gentleness, Goodness, Fidelity, Meekness, and Temperance. 76 When therefore you feel yourselves prompted by opportunity, incited by an internal desire to acts of benevolence, of sympathetic feeling for the wants, whether temporal or spiritual of your fellow creatures, when you perceive yourselves influenced by a feeling of duty to bless them that revile you, and to do good for evil, when you experience a persevering gen- tleness, a powerful meekness inducing you to triumph over your rudest passions, checking the fury of wrath, breaking the determination of revenge, — when you find yourselves inclined to postpone every consideration to those of fidelity and truth, — when your breasts kindle with the love of God, and the ardent desire to be perfect as he is perfect, and pure even as he is pure, do not imagine that these are the sugges- tions of your own unaided heart, — they are the voice of that God of whom you are the temple, they are the commands of that kingdom which is established within you, — and it is destruction to disobey them. But perhaps you will say these influences are all in the ordinary course of nature, we all from time to time experience them, without feeling that they proceed from any supernatural cause. — If by the course of nature be meant, the course by which God ad- ministers all things both in heaven and earth, I fully agree with you, that they are the ordi- nary course of this part of nature. — Since the 77 sacrifice of Christ's atonement for the world, I trust there is no one who has not received of these spiritual gifts according to the measure of his faith. — With us they cease to be superna- tural, though perhaps before that blessed aera, they might well be called so ; when mankind were given over to their own heart's lusts, filled with all unrighteousness, devoid of na- tural affection, implacable, unmerciful. Do not imagine that the exertions of the spirit are confined to prophecy, speaking with tongues, and working miracles. — These, being no longer requisite for the diffusion of the Gospel, have ceased, but there are others which I have men- tioned above, which are in Scripture equally referred to the Holy Ghost, and which, being of eternal necessity, must be of eternal influence. Do not imagine that God cannot reign in your hearts, except you have some unusual, some miraculous experience of his approach and ener- gy.— The kingdom of God is like to the plant which springeth up and groweth to maturity by the incomprehensible workings of Providence.— The wind bloweth when and where it listeth, and we know not whence it cometh, or whi- ther it goeth, so is every man who is born of the Spirit. Do not expect to be able to ascertain the measure of its progress, — for " the " kingdom of God cometh not with obser- " vatibn, neither shall ye say lo here or lo 78 " there — for behold the kingdom of God is " within you." When therefore you feel such dispositions, encourage them, cherish them, yield yourselves to them. They are the seals of your acceptance with God, the evidences of his kingdom, the pledges of your future glori- fication. Do not imagine, that as being the suggestions of your own heart, it is a matter of no great importance, whether you hear, or whether you forbear, — that if you follow it is well, — it is more than well, it is meritorious, — but that if you neglect, it is only the absence of merit.-— Be assured they are talents com- mitted to your charge, of which you must give an account at the last great day, as though it had been to an austere master.. — They are the voice of the kingdom of God within you,— beware how you disobey. — Be assured that (as Saint James has declared) " every good and " every perfect gift is from above, and co- " meth down from the Father of lights, with " whom there is no variableness, neither sha- " dow of turning. — Follow therefore after that " which is good, and putting away from your- " selves all impurity and superfluity of naugh- " tiness, receive with meekness" — the com- mand of God imprinted on your hearts, — which speaks in the still small voice of conscience, the strong deep sense of reverence and duty, the warm, the overpowering pleadings of natural 79 affection ; — receive, I say, with meekness " the engrafted word which is able to save your souls." SERMON VI. I. Corinthians, v.— 11. But now I have written unto you not to keep company, — if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner ; with such a one no not to eat. I HAVE chosen this passage for my text, my fellow Christians, because it gives us, in a com- prehensive and determinate form, the strength and substance of many other accordant scrip- tural authorities, which declare to us the neces. sity of the separation of the righteous from the wicked. — I have chosen it also, because it points out to us explicitly what are the scriptural grounds of separation, and because, when com" 80 pared with the context, it indicates what were the reasons for its injunctions, and of course affords us a rule for the degree to which the se- paration should be carried, and the manner in which it should be exercised, as the. knowledge of the end must always regulate the adminis- tration of the means. I the more readily enter on this subject, as I know the precepts for se- paration have been misapplied by several sec- tarists, and by some I fear who do not consi- der themselves as such, to the breaking of the bonds of Christian peace, and the closing of the avenues of Christian charity. — The passion for distinction which is natural to the human heart, the affectation of being something uncommon, something separate from the generality, has at all times influenced mankind in their religion, as well as in their temporal conduct, not recol- lecting that we may differ without being more wise, and separate without being more holy. A comparison of my text with other similar passages, by ascertaining what are the scriptu- ral grounds for separation, will indicate at the same time what are not. — Had it stood single, had it been the only precept on the subject, we should be authorized in considering that nothing was so, except immoral conduct, or absolute idolatry. — If there be any other scriptural ground, it must be authorized elsewhere. Let 81 us therefore see what the other parallel autho- rities of Scripture are ;— " Mark those," says the same Apostle to the Romans, " which cause " divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine " which ye have learned, and avoid them, for " they that are such serve not our Lord Jesus, " but their own belly/' — It is here to be ob- served, that the divisions, the differences of doctrine, which are stated as a ground of sepa- ration, are those which are coupled with of- fences, those which are upheld by men who serve not our Lord Jesus, but their own carnal inclinations. Saint John declares that, " who- " soever transgresseth and abideth not in the " doctrine of Christ hath not God — such a one" (says he) " receive not into your houses, bid *' him not God speed, for he that biddeth him « God speed, is partaker of his evil deeds." — Here again we may observe, that the departure from the doctrine of Christ, which is made the ground of prohibiting social intercourse, is a de- parture accompanied by transgression, and the danger apprehended is that of being partakers of evil deeds. " If any man" saith Paul to Ti- mothy " consent not to the words of our Lord " Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is ac- " cording to godliness, doting about strifes of " words, and perverse disputings of men of " corrupt minds, supposing that gain is godli- " ness, from such withdraw thyself, for they VOL. I. G 82 " that will be rich fall into many hurtful lusts, " which drown men in destruction and perdi- " tion." — Here it is to be remarked, that the error of those from whom Timothy is cautioned to withdraw himself, is the error of men of cor- rupt minds, who suppose that they can make the profession of godliness a source of gain, that they can at once serve God and Mammon, who anxious after money are led into temptation, and a snare, and many foolish, and hurtful lusts. These three are the principal, if not the only passages in Scripture, in which speculative error is pointed to as a ground for separation, and in all of them the error is strongly marked, and grievous, and accompanied by proportion- ably flagrant sinfulness. All the other texts re- specting separation, are nearly the same in sub- stance with that which I have chosen for my present subject, and confined exclusively to impurity and depravity of conduct. " Blessed " is the man," saith the Psalmist, " who walk- " eth not in the counsel of the ungodly, nor " standeth in the way of sinners, nor sitteth in " the seat of the scornful." — " Have no fel- " lowship," saith the Apostle to the Galatians, " with the unfruitful works of darkness, but ra- " ther reprove them." — And again, when ad- dressing the Corinthians, " Come out from " among them, and be ye separate, saith the " Lord, and touch not the unclean thing, and 83 *« I will receive you." The other passages on the same subject, are of a similar complexion.— Are we not therefore warranted in concluding, that error, except it be such as that characte- rised above, is not a scriptural ground for sepa- ration. — Any error indeed, which comes short of this, is rather a disease of the mind, which calls for the kind offices of Christian compassion, and the healing influence of Christian love. — It is not the incurable leprosy which separates from the camp. — It is not the hopeless plague inevitably destructive to its victim, and almost equally so to those who approach, which should drive him from the haunts of men, and interdict the exertion of human feeling. — It is the com- mon hazard of mankind, to which we are all ex- posed, and which therefore demands sympathy, rather than alienation.— The Physician who de- serts his patient will never heal him ; nor will the Christian who flies from his brother, ever convert him from darkness unto light, nor from the power of Satan unto God. If being weak in faith be not a sufficient ground for rejection from the Church of Christ; if no error, but that which is obviously and fruitfully productive of sinfulness of life, be a scriptural ground for separation, what shall we say to those who descend to the ordinary, the insignificant amusements of the world, the un- g 2 84 important peculiarities of dress or phraseology, for marks to distinguish a Christian spirit, and direct them to whom they shall stretch forth the hand of brotherhood, and from whom they shall withhold it, — -judging of the inward man by marks which any hypocrite may assume, and refusing their countenance to those who cannot see, and will not pretend to see, any importance in the peculiar texture of a sentence, the form of a habit, or the nature of an exercise whether of mind or body with which they recreate their leisure hours. — Is not there a presumptuous ostentation in all this ? is there not a tacit pro- fession that they have so regulated their hearts, so perfected themselves in the weighter matters of the law, that they have now nothing to em- ploy their Christian vigilance but these trifles ? — Be not misled, my fellow Christians, the king- dom of God is not meat and drink, not trivial observances, nor the inventions of the day, but holiness, and peace, and joy in the Lord. — It is a melancholy reflection to consider, how prone men have been in all ages to devise for them- selves fancied forms of holiness, and to choose for themselves individual lines of obedience. The Pharisee placed his religion in strict cere- monial observance, he gave tithe of mint and anise, and lengthened the corners of his gar- ment, mistaking the prohibition of an obsolete idolatrous custom, for a permanent moral pre- 85 cept, these observances he called righteousness. The Gnostic placed his claim to superiority over his fellows, in the entertainment of mystical speculations, and imagined he saw, in the vi- sions of a disordered fancy, the glories of the unsearchable God ; — this he called holines. — The Ascetic fled from the enjoyments, the la- bours, and the duties of social life, deserted the theatre of moral obedience, forsook the post assigned him by the Captain of his salva- tion, — and persuaded himself that this living suicide was the sanctity of consecration. But, my fellow Christians, the separation which the Apostle enjoins is on none of these grounds. — The description of people from whom we are to turn away are here, and in many other parts of Scripture, described to be selfish, cove Lous, blasphemers, unholy, incontinent, despisers of those that are good ; — lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God, professing a religion by the power of which they refuse to be led ; turn- ing the grace of God into lasciviousness ; deny- ing our Lord Jesus Christ, and walking after their own ungodly lusts.— -And the reason of the injuction is given in another place, where, after the conclusion of some moral precepts, the Apostle says, " If any man obey not our word, ** note that man, and have no company with " him, — that he may be a ashamed, yet count 86 " him not as an enemy, but admonish him as a " brother." And in another place, " Know ye M not that a little leaven leaveneth the whole " lump ? be not deceived, evil communication " corrupts good morals." — So that the motives of the injunction seem to be, no apprehension of ideal profanation of our Christian sanctity, no assumption of that vengeance which belong- eth unto the Lord, no officious vindication of the offended majesty of God, — but merely, and soberly, the reformation of the offender, and the avoidance of the real contamination likely to ensue from evil example. And for the reformation of the sinner him- self, perhaps there cannot, humanly speaking, be imagined a more powerful instrument, than the strongly marked feeling of disapprobation, which is expressed by abstaining from his com- pany and social intercourse. Half the power of sin is derived from the countenance which it receives, and the withholding of the merited expression of abhorrence. Mankind naturally look for the society, the countenance of each other, and would sacrifice any thing rather than have their estimation in the eyes of their fel- lows depreciated. This, as it is often on the side of sin, so it may be made to act on the side of virtue. — And the Scriptures recommend it.— " Be ye not unequally yoked with unbelievers," 87 says Saint Paul, " for what fellowship hath " righteousness with unrighteousness, what " communion hath light with darkness ?" And again, " Them that sin, rebuke before all, that " others also may fear *** and again, " Be in- " stant in season, and out of season, reprove, " rebuke, exhort, with all long suffering."— And again, " Withdraw yourselves from every " brother that walketh disorderly." — Such, my fellow Christians, are the words of Scripture recommending the sanction of social censure. This discountenancing of vice applies itself to one of the most powerful of our passions, shame. What man, except the most abandon- ed, perhaps not even the most abandoned, would wish to have his sins known to those who he is convinced would, in consequence, despise and fly from his society ? What wretch would make ostentation of his impurity to some com- pany of venerable clergy, or some society of religiously dignified females ? — And my friends* did every Christian dignify his character, by openly and boldly discountenancing vice, — did he render himself respectable, and venerable^ by declaring that he not only would not commit those things, against which he knew the judg- ments of God, but also that he would not have pleasure in them that do them, — did every Christian manifest that he rejoiced not in ini- 88 quity, but rejoiced in the truth, — every assem- bly would be then too venerable, too reverend, too sanctified for sinners. — To whom then should the slanderer seek to make himself agreeable ? — From whom should the deceiver expect the praise of superior wisdom ? — To whom should the seducer boast himself? — From whom should the duellist seek his reward for the sacrifice of his natural feelings, of his reason, and of his conscience ?— The law of opinion operates with sovereign power, not only because its sanctions are inevitable, but because they are immediate, and because they are irresistible. — The seducer who regards not man, nor God, nor even his own heart, who values not truth, nor honesty, nor sincerity, will yet be true to any public pro- mise, because though he fears neither the phy- sical nor the civil power of man, he cannot bear his contempt. — The duellist who sets the law of God and of the state at defiance, will yet do nothing which the world calls unfair, because he is not bold enough to defy the law of opinion. — There is no wretch however abandoned, how- ever hardened, however dead in trespasses and sin, who does not cling to the countenance of some society, and while he is sinking in the abyss of self condemnation, catch at some straw, some particle of public esteem. And why should we not comply with the re- 89 peated injunctions of the Apostle, and use these sanctions on the side of religion ?-— The sinner who is made ashamed of his sins, will be likely soon to wish for the grace of God to en- able him to forsake them.— The transition is easy, from shame to sorrow, from sorrow to re- morse, and from remorse to repentance. Exclusive of these obvious and salutary effects on the sinner, the consequences of discounten- ancing vice are to ourselves highly beneficial. It most completely obviates the contagion of evil example, and in this excels the solitude of the recluse, as it removes us from the vices of society, without abstracting us from its duties. — The monastery or the desart never presented such a barrier to the intrusion of sin, as the manly reprehension, the discountenancing ab- horrence of depraved character, which while it consecrates us to the service of God, in turn- ing the hearts of the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, inscribes on our own breasts, " ho- " liness to the Lord."— The man who sets his face against sin in others, will be strengthened in his power of resisting it himself. — He that walketh not in the way of the ungodly will have his delight in the law of the Lord ;— -he will feel with full force the glaring absurdity which our Lord describes— of plucking out the mote out of our brother's eye, while there is a beam 90 in our own. — He that wields the sanctions of opinion against irreligion and ungodliness in others — will feel himself more strongly pledged to purity of life.— The fear of absurdity is not one of the least powerful springs of human con- duct, and what greater absurdity could there be, than after we had preached to others, ourselves to become cast away ? — No, my fellow Chris- tians, what we consider in others as a just cause of contempt and censure, we will be very slow to admit in ourselves. — And the habitual repre- hension of sin will make us more fully sensible of the abhorrence which it merits. But perhaps you will say we cannot exer- cise this sanction of opinion, without setting ourselves against the voice of the world.— While society is constituted as it is, we cannot take on ourselves the office of censors. — Why not ? — There are sectarists who do it. — I never heard of a duellist Quaker, I never heard of an avowed profligate Methodist, who was associ- ated with by his brethren. — Their speculative opinions are wrong— yours are right. — but what, I beseech you, is there in rectitude of specula- tion to prevent your compliance with the Apos- tolical precept ? But farther, you yourselves do in part comply with it. If any man is a known thief who would associate with him ?— Why then company with an open blasphemer, with 91 an avowed profligate, with a declared duellist ? except, perhaps that blasphemy, and fornication, and murder, are less degrading sins than theft. — Open your Bibles, my fellow Christians, and try if you can find them so. — You can withhold the hand of fellowship from those who are your inferiors in temporal rank, though perhaps your equals in the eyes of God, — and will you not at his command, withdraw your countenance from those who are degrading their spiritual rank, who are resting on that countenance to plunge themselves into eternal ruin ? — Be assured you cannot do an act of greater kindness to your best friend, than to set your face against his vices. — How many a sinner in the beginning of his career, or even when farther advanced, would have been saved, had some kind and sincere friend told him, in the manly language of Christianity, that there could be no fellow- ship between a follower of Jesus Christ and the children of Belial.— Advice he might have con- sidered as an unsanctioned, and perhaps insin- cere common place, but he would have felt the alienation of his friend, so strongly, so power- fully, throughout his moral system, as that it might have awakened him from the paralisis of sin, to the intellectual vigour of righteousness. . But you will say, what can we do individually against the voice of the world ? we have no 92 authority, no influence of situation. After hav- ing rendered ourselves suspected of hypocrisy, —after having excited the indignation, and perhaps, what is worse, the laughter of our friends— we shall lose our labour.— You know not, my fellow Christians, the power of even a single voice in directing public opinion. — You know not the power of a single voice, where it is on the right side, and is accompanied with the blessing of God. — Ten righteous men could have preached repentance, exemplified holiness, to the inhabitants of Sodom, and have stopped the torrent of fiery indignation from Lord, which. overthrew that devoted city. — One pro- phet preached and successfully preached repent- ance to the inhabitants of Nineveh, and one single voice crying in the wilderness was deemed sufficient to prepare the way of the Lord. Pub- lic opinion is powerful, because it is considered as universal, but where it is erroneous, one manly voice is oftentimes sufficient to kindle the spark of truth, which shall flash throughout all its mazes, and the pestilential vapour which threat- ened destruction shall cease to exist. But my fellow Christians you are not so few, though you bear but a small proportion to the numerical population of your country, you bear, and will bear, a great one to that body, which shall sway its opinions, and direct its judg- t 93 merits. — I will not remind you that a Christian ought not to be put into competition with each other, the voice of the world and the com- mands of God. — But I will tell you, that com- petition is little likely to offer itself ; — for you yourselves are the world. — Some of you are to be the legislators, many the lawyers, many the pastors, of your country, many the instructers of her youth. — All of you are to be those cha- racters which will give tone to private society, and expression to public sentiment. Ye are the lights of the world, let not that light be darhness. Let me entreat you, by the Lord Jesus Christ, that you be Christians in your se- veral capacities, — that you confine not your re- ligion to your closets, that ye dapart not from Christ when you shut your Bibles or rise from your knees. — What you say in the seat of jus- tice, say in the tenor of your lives and conver- sation to the world. What you say to the con- gregation, say in your conduct outside the walls of your church. — What you say to those whom you instruct, confirm by your example and general indication of sentiment, — that vice is the greatest degradation,— that sin is the most legitimate object of abhorrence, and that from those who will not forsake it — the Christian ought to turn away. So shall ye bring the voice of public opinion to the side of religion, so shall ye contribute, as far as in you lies, to the sanc- tification of God's name, the establishment of 94 his kingdom, and the obedience to his will, on earth, as it is in heaven. Now unto hinl that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory, to the only wise God our Saviour be glory, majesty, dominion, and power, both now and for ever. SERMON VII. II. Corinthians, xiii. — 5. Examine yourselves. THE duty of self examination, so necessary to every man, and so frequently recommended by the Scriptures to every Christian, is generally thought to refer principally to actions, and those 95 thoughts of our hearts, and indulged propen- sities of our nature which exemplify themselves in external conduct. — Here, however, the Apos- tle directs us to a species of self examination which, however it may be ultimately reducible to the same general description, is at first view apparently very different, and perhaps for this reason less attended to than its importance re- quires—" Examine yourselves whether you be in the faith." — This, my friends, is a question which we find it very difficult to see the neces- sity of asking ourselves, and still more difficult to bear its being asked by others. — We readily admit that perhaps we are occasionally deficient in practice, that our love to God is not so strongly influential on our conduct at some times as at others ; but we are very slow to sus- pect the possibility of our not being in the faith, or even of our being not perfectly competent to declare to others what the right faith is. And yet my fellow Christians, Charity, and love to God, and Christian faith, are reciprocally indications of each other, mutually commensu- rate, and inseparably connected. — Hence^ the vital importance of the inquiry. C >A dtaiitw ,ftv>i.;; - : *r>u(:r> oil '. s nul*t aflttb sqjilL Were Faith a mere assent to abstract truth on the demonstrations of reason, — a mere admission of historical relation on a satisfactory proba- bility, it would be referrible rather to philoso- 96 phical accuracy, than to religious excellence, and the scriptural injunction of it as a condition for salvation would be superfluous. We should then believe with the head unto conviction, and not with the heart unto obedience. — Be assured that the faith which has power to purify our hearts from sin, to fill them with the love of God, to lead us to all righteousness, to crown us with everlasting life as the sons of God and joint heirs with Christ, is something more than this. — How important, how interesting is the en- quiry whether we be in it ? — whether we be in that which is the exclusive gift of the spirit, the peculiar mark of our adoption, and the only means of our salvation. What is Faith, is a question which we must first solve, before we proceed to the enquiry of whether we be in it. — Let no man represent to you what Christian Faith ought to mean accord- ing to the intricate speculations of human inge- nuity, the fancied measures devised by man to estimate the things which be of God. — Let no man represent to you Christian Faith as a mys- tical name for something he knows not what, something which he cannot express, which he himself and those who join themselves to him are possessed of, to the exclusion of all others j but search the Scriptures humbly, dispassion- ately, and soberly, for the genuine description 97 of that Faith which is required of you. — Search them, I say, humbly, that ye may have the aid of that Spirit who resisteth the proud, and giveth grace unto the humble ; dispassionately, that ye may be of Christ, rather than of Paul, or of Apollos, and soberly, that ye may not seek to be wise above that which is written. Faith, as described in Scripture, appears to be naturally resolvable into three branches, dis- tinguishable from each other, though united in their origin and correspondent in their effects. It contains the belief that God has performed a certain act, for a certain purpose, namely, that he has sent his Son into the world, to save us from the abandoned misery of sin on this side of the grave, and to redeem ns from that everlast- ing destruction which is its just wages hereafter. It contains a firm persuasion of the efficacy of the rules of life which he has proposed to us, and of the certainty of the sanctions by which they are accompanied ; and it also contains a firm reliance on the mercy of God, a strong as- surance of his love, a casting all our care on him who has so cared for us. With respect to the first of these, namely, the facts which are the objects of Faith, it may per- haps seem to some, that we ought to class with them the authority of the Scriptures themselves, VOL. I. H 98 and the truth of the relation which they contain, considered as a mere history of events subject to human observation and capable of human testimony. — But this is the distinction which of all others I would most particularly wish to im- press on you, that our reception of these latter is mere historical assent, and though it prepares the way for, is perfectly distinct from, religious Faith. — I would wish, I say, to call your atten- tion to this distinction, because it will enable us to answer a favourite objection of infidelity, grounded on our assent not being in our power, and to justify the ways of God to man, in re- quiring faith as an indispensable condition, and proposing it as a sure means of salvation.— Preserved with an almost superstitious venera- tion through successive ages, handed down to us through innumerable and independent chan- nels, perpetually referred to by hostile sects, and contending disputants, unquestioned, as to authority, even by its enemies who rejected its tenets, the history of the New Testament comes to us, with a mass of evidence which no other history has to boast. — What other history has been the constant study of so many individuals through successive ages from its first production to the present time, and all of them watching each other, so as to prevent the possibility of any alteration, or forgery ? — Of the authenticity of what other history have so many men who 99 were in every respect qualified to judge been so firmly persuaded, as to give up the strongest desires of the human heart, and even life itself, rather than reject it ? — No, my friends, there can be no doubt that these Scriptures are the unadulterated productions of the early Chris- tians who were eye witnesses of the facts therein related. — If we merely attend to the proofs, our assent to the authenticity of these writings is necessary, not elective ; historical, not religious ; and we are placed in the same situation, as if we heard the relation from the Evangelists themselves. — Let me now ask you, my friends, if you had lived in the age of the Evangelists, and heard their narrative from their own lips, if you had witnessed the integrity, and compe- tency, and sincerity which it is evident they were possessed of, would your assent be con- tingent? Could you withhold it from the facts contained in that narrative, as far as they came under human observation, namely, that there was such a person as Jesus Christ, who lived, and spoke, and acted, and died as the Evan- gelists have described him, that he performed, or at least appeared to perform, certain mira- cles,— that he conversed with them after his crucifixion, and appeared to be finally taken from their sight, in a miraculous manner, — and that his Disciples, after his death, appeared to perform miracles resembling his ? 100 These facts are related, not by one single witness, but by many whose competency is un- questioned, and whose sincerity is confirmed by their conduct, and sealed with their blood. — So far our assent cannot be contingent, cannot, if we attend to the proofs, be in our own power ; it must be stronger than that which we give to any other history, because no other history is so strongly attested. To speak of such a faith being required of us by God, is superfluous; to think that such of itself is able to save us is ab- surd. — It is a faith which many, if not all of the Jews, most assuredly had, — a faith which Simon Magus must have possessed, although in the bond of sin, and very gall of bitterness. But there are other facts, declared by the Evangelists, which are not the immediate ob- jects of human observation, and of which there- fore they can give — not their testimony — but their opinion, their judgment, their persuasion; — namely, that God sent his Son into the world, that the purpose for which he sent him was to redeem mankind, that the Word was God, that his miracles, his resurrection, his ascension, the pouring out of his spirit at Pentecost were real, and consequently confirmations of his di- vinity. — These are the appropriate objects of Christian faith ; assent to these is voluntary in its entertainment, though in its commence- 101 merit and perfection it be the gift of God. — It is voluntary in its entertainment, I say, for many of the Jews to whom it was first pro- posed received, many rejected it ; — and many of those who call themselves Christians, in the latter and present times, reject it, contenting themselves with that historical faith, which I have above described, and justly doubting how faith, as they understand it, a faith which is not in our own power, can be required of us by God, or become a cause, or condition of our future salvation. Our assent to the assertions of Scripture re- specting the person, the office, and the powers of Jesus Christ, is naturally related, and may be considered as extending to the assertions concerning the nature and attributes of the Deity, which occur in the sacred w ritings. — Our belief in these, as far as the authority goes, is requisite ; — but no farther. — Let me anxiously caution you against endeavouring to be wise above what is written, against endeavouring to form philosophical theories respecting the na- ture of God, the manner of his existence, and attributes, beyond what his condescension has revealed to our weakness. — It is dangerous thus to attempt to put forth our hand to the ark of the Lord ; it is presumptuous thus to draw the veil from before the Holy of Holies. — But should 102 we make these our differences of speculation the means of weakening our Christian charity, and bursting the bonds of Christian peace, the pre- sumption becomes wickedness, and the danger becomes destruction. — Surely this is hating our brother without a cause. — Let me also here take occasion to caution you against what appears to me to be a mistake on the subject of faith ; though I do it with respectful diffidence, because I know it to be the opinion of some learned and worthy men, that our religious faith is prima- rily founded on a demonstration of the exist- ence and attributes of God derived from the principles of metaphisical reasoning, or that we believe in Christ, because we have first believed in God.— To me it appears that no man can come to the Father except through the Son, — that the world by wisdom cannot know their God. — They may, perhaps, have some faint idea that there is a superior being, but of his attri- butes they can have scarce any ; — and what is God without his attributes ? In what God did the gentiles, to whom Saint Paul so success- fully turned himself, believe ? — In Jupiter. — Do you think that believing in Jupiter is believing in God ? — Or that Demetrius of Ephesus would have been more open to the preaching of Paul, than Diagoras the Athenian atheist had he lived in his day ? — The opinion is in itself unimport- ant, but I caution you not to receive it with- 103 out enquiry, because it appears to me to be sub- servient to a delusion, which has, and docs mislead too many, that while they believe in a narrative which they can historically substan- tiate, and a God whose being and attributes they can rationally prove, they fancy they have all the faith which is required of us for salva- tion. But, my fellow Christians, we are no where told, that a belief in the veracity of the Evan- gelists as to the external facts which they re- late, will procure for us salvation. — Were it so, salvation would have been very general in the age of the Apostles, for most of their hearers knew these facts to be true. — What we are told is, that if we believe that Jesus Christ came forth from God, was the Son of the most high God, that the words which he spake and the works which he wrought were the words and works of God, we shall be saved, — we shall have, or rather actually have within us, the principle and cause of everlasting life. This is the faith which the very brethren of Jesus had not, when they are described as not believing in him, — which those of his disciples had not, who are described as leaving him and walking no more with him, — a faith which is given, rather than acquired, which was revealed to Peter, not by flesh and blood, but by the Father which is in 104 heaven, and impressed on the unwilling mind of Paul, by the miraculous manifestation of the Son of God. Historical assent is related to this faith, only as a subservient preparation, a condition which we must presuppose, as the Apostle describes hearing to be ; — " how shall " they believe if they have not heard ?" — we cannot have faith without having historical as- sent, but we may have historical assent without having faith. Faith is farther characterised by its being in- fluential on conduct, by being a faith unto obe- dience, by our believing with our whole hearts unto righteousness. — And this leads me to the consideration of what I stated to be the second part of the description of religious faith, name- ly, belief of the efficacy of the rules of life which Christ has proposed to us, and the cer- tianty of the sanctions by which he has autho- rized them ; — a belief naturally connected with and resulting from our assurance, that in him dwelt the fulness of the Godhead. — If we be- lieve Christ to have been the Son of God, wlio so loved the world, that he sent his Son to be its Redeemer and Judge j if we believe him to be God, who so loved us, that he gave himself for us, we must receive with full and heartfelt and effective conviction, his authority and compe- tency, arising from infinite power and infinite 105 benevolence, to propose to us such rules of life, as shall be most certainly conducive to his gra- cious purpose, of saving us from the bondage of sin, and regenerating us to a life of holiness ; — we must also admit his power to sanction, and his veracity to perform his promises and de- nunciations. — The rules which he has left us form no abstruse, nor intricate, nor voluminous code of legislation. He that runs may read ; he that reads cannot forget ; he bears it about with him written on his heart, and illumined by the Spirit of God, as an unerring guide for his external conduct ; it is briefly comprehended in this saying, " Thou shalt love the Lord thy " God with all thy heart, and with all thy " mind, and with all thy strength, and thou " shalt love thy neighbour as thyself." On this have the Apostles commented, declaring the in- separability of its parts and their efficacy to a life of holiness, calling the love of God the ef- ficacy of the Spirit of Christ within us, and de- scribing the results of love to man as the fruits and graces of the same holy Comforter. — How beautifully, under the name of Charity, does Saint Paul enumerate the effects of this heaven- ly precept ? How succinctly does he prove, in another place, that love is the fulfilling of the law ?— A belief of the efficacy and an obedience to the authority of these precepts, is as neces- sary and as constituent a part of Christian faith, 106 as a belief of the nature and office of our Re- deemer. — In the ordinary use of language, be- lieving in any person immediately and prima- rily signifies believing the truth of what he says. In many parts of the Scripture it is de- clared under various forms of expression, that without holiness no man shall see the Lord ; — in many others, faith is asserted to be of itself sufficient for salvation ; propositions which it is impossible to reconcile, if we admit any thing to be faith, except that which is faith unto obe- dience. Indeed the impossibility of believing Christ to be the Son of God, and not feeling the indispensable necessity of following the path of sanctification which he has marked out for us, is so great that it would seem absurdly superfluous to attempt to prove the inseparabi- lity of faith and obedience, were it not a me- lancholy truth, not merely that some heretics have attempted to disjoin them ; — but that we all are too ready to flatter ourselves, that our faith is pure, unshaken and uncorrupted, though we may occasionally defer or be deficient in our obedience ; — not knowing, or at least not in- fluentially feeling, that such as is the one, such will be the other also. The time usually allotted to discourses from this place would not allow me to enter, as fully as I would wish, into the proof, that trust and 107 confidence in God and casting all our care on him who has so cared for us, forms an essen- tially constituent part of Christian faith. — Nor would it allow me to call your attention, suffi- ciently for the importance of the subject, to what may be the best criterion for proving whe- ther we be in the faith. — I must therefore defer these considerations to a future opportunity. Now unto him that is able to keep from fall- ing, and to present you faultless before the pre- sence of his glory with exceeding joy, to the only wise God our Saviour, be glory, and ma- jesty, and dominion, now and for ever. SERMON VIII. II. Corinthians, xiii. — 5. Examine yourselves, whether you be in the Faith; 'prove your own-selves. Know ye not that Jesus Christ is in you, except ye be reprobates ? WHEN I addressed you on a former occasion concerning the nature and effect of Christian faith, I endeavoured to prove to you, that it consists, not so much in an assent to the ge- nuiness of the Scriptures, and the sincerity of their authors, not so much in a belief of the facts therein related, as far as they could natu- rally be the objects of human testimony, as in a firm persuasion, that the opinions of these au- thors concerning the person and office of Jesus 109 Christ are well founded, a conviction that he was sent by the Father, was God manifested in the flesh, that in him dwelt the fulness of the Godhead bodily, and that consequently the rules of life, which he has left us, and the pro- mises which he has bequeathed to us, are the laws and promises of God, perfectly sufficient to produce our sanctification in this life, and to insure our everlasting glory in that which is to come. I also proposed to endeavour to shew you, that Christian faith includes a trust and confidence in God's mercy, a laying hold of the hope which is set before us, a casting all our care on him who has so cared for us ; and I stated, that after shewing, that this faith is voluntary in its entertainment, although in its commence- ment and perfection it be the gift of God, and therefore as justly required as it is graciously offer- ed, I would proceed to enquire, what is the most appropriate criterion for ascertaining whether we be in it,— what are the best means for exa- mining and proving our own-selves, and exer- cising that judgment, which we are invited by Christ and his Apostles to exercise on ourselves, though forbidden to extend to others, these considerations shall be the subject of my pre- sent discourse. W ere faith however to be limited to a belief 110 in the person and office of Christ, and an as- surance of his competency and authority as a le- gislator, it would be incomplete, and conse- quently insufficient for being a faith unto sal- vation. Such a faith Judas probably had when he hanged himself. — Such a faith have the de- vils, of whom it is said, that they believe and tremble, and who are described as bearing wit- ness to Christ, not merely that they believed, but that they knew him to be the Son of God. Why did Judas hang himself? Because his faith did not contain hope. — He madly sought to atone for his guilt, because he imagined he could expect no part in the atonement of our Redeemer. — Why is the faith of Devils repre- sented as enhancing their misery, rather than producing any good effect ? Because it does not contain hope. — Because they do not believe themselves to be objects of a Redeemer's love. — No, my fellow Christians, it is not enough that we believe that Christ has died. — We must also be persuaded, that he has died for us. We must feel an assurance, that we are the objects of the love of that God who gave himself for us. — We must apply to ourselves individually those gracious promises of mercy and salvation, which he has addressed to his chosen, that glo- rious Gospel, those tidings of exceeding joy, before we can feel a reciprocal affection, a grateful devotement of the heart unto God, be- Ill fore we can have that faith which worketh by love, which bringeth forth fruit unto righteous- ness, and whose end is everlasting life. — In many parts of Scripture love of God is describ- ed as the perfection of faith, as the proximate cause of our righteousness and sanctification. If a man love me, saith our blessed Redeemer, if a man love me, he will keep my commandments, and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and take up our abode with him. — AVe are again told by the Apostle, that our love to God is the natural consequence of our conviction that he first loved us. — " Herein is " our love to God manifested, not that we first " loved him, but that he first loved us." — So that it appears, that in order to form a perfect idea of Christian Faith, such a Faith as shall be capable of producing its appropriate fruits, we must superadd to our belief of the divinity and authority of Christ, a persuasion that we are the objects of the love of God, and a conse- quent trust and confidence in his mercy. — This is the Faith, the deficiency of which our Sa- viour so often blames in his disciples. — When he would repress that excessive anxiety con- cerning the things of this world, which is so natural to the heart of man ; calling their at- tention to the unconflned bounty of their hea- venly Father diffused throughout even the hum- blest parts of his creation, he exclaims against 112 their want of Faith. When he would reprove that distrustful fear which imminent danger of a tempest had excited, he addresses them by the chiding epithet, " Oh ! ye of little Faith." When he beheld the momentary confidence of Peter failing, that momentary confidence in his Master, which had at first miraculously sup- ported him on the waters, he refers this failure to the deficiency of his faith. " Oh ! thou of " little faith, wherefore didst thou doubt ?" In these passages, and others of a similar descrip- tion, Faith must immediately and primarily signify a trust and confidence in the protecting mercy of God. They therefore afford full evi- dence, that our Saviour considered that trust and confidence as essential and discriminating characteristics of that Faith, which he required of mankind. And indeed if we examine into the nature of the Faith, which is stated to have been frequently the instrument or operative cause of the miraculous cures performed by our blessed Lord, we shall find that it was of the same description. — As to the nature and office of our Lord, even his disciples themselves were, in a great measure, ignorant during his life time, and what they did know, he had strictly charged them, that they should tell no man. What therefore could have been the nature of the faith of those individuals who were the ob- jects of his healing mercy ? — They could not be 113 said to believe, for they had never heard those sublime truths, which afterwards contributed to form the speculative part of Christian Faith. — But they did believe what they had heard, — that he was sent by God to be the Saviour of his people, — was the messenger of divine mercy, and in that mercy did they trust, and therefore were they healed ; affording at once, as being the objects of the miraculous exertion of a be- nevolent power, an evidence of the divinity of his mission, and a typical example to his fol- lowers, that they should lay hold on the hope that was set before them, and trust in the mercy of their God for salvation from their sins, and the renewal of a right spirit within them. — What is meant by the speech of the woman who reminds our Lord, that the dogs eat of the crumbs, which fall from their master's table? What is meant, I say, but that she believed, that however humble she might be in the sight of God, she was still the object of his mercy ? — And yet of her, our Saviour declares, " Oh ! " woman, great is thy Faith." — When the blind Bartimeus struggled with every obstacle, that he might have the opportunity of beseeching our Lord to restore him to sight, what did this earnestness imply, but, that he believed in his power, and had reliance on his compassion ? — To him, our Lord declares, as he did also to many others who had evinced a similar hope in VOL. I. I 114 his mercy, " Thy faith hath made thee whole." So that it appears, that one of the principal characteristics of Faith, that property by which it becomes capable of being the instrument of divine mercy, that property by which it be- comes capable of arresting the progress of mo- ral corruption, is a hope, a trust, a confidence in that mercy. If we turn to the writings of the Apostles, we shall find that their main design appears to be, to evince to us, that we are to look to Christ as the author and finisher of our faith, the purifier of our hearts, the enlightener of our minds, our guide to holiness, and the sa- crifice by whose blood atonement is made for our transgressions ; or if I may be allowed to use Saint Paul's comprehensive form of expres- sion, " that Christ is of God made unto us " wisdom, and righteousness, and sanctifica- R tion, and redemption." — So that, to believe in Christ must be to believe, that he is, and will be to us, the exclusive cause, the unerring hope, the certain author of every valuable ac- quisition. Do we wish to know the things which be of God? It is to Christ, and to him alone, we are to look for this illumination for the natural man receiveth not the things which be of God, neither indeed can he, — Do we wish that sin should not reign in our members, but 115 that we should walk in that righteousness in which God hath commanded us ? It is to Christ we are to look for the power ; for our suf- ficiency is of him, and not of ourselves. — But, to say that we believe all this, is only by a va- ried form of language to express our trust and confidence in the love of our Redeemer. Having thus detailed what appears to me to be the scriptural description of Christian Faith, namely a belief of the divinity, a recognition of the authority, and a confidence in the mercy of Christ, I shall proceed to enquire how far this faith depends on ourselves, an enquiry the more important, as its result will, I trust, fur- nish an answer to one of the most specious ob- jections against our holy religion. There are some unfortunate persons, who not content with rejecting the revelation of Christ, would wish to persuade themselves, or at least others, that they disbelieve it on rational and philosophical grounds. — These men maintain that Faith, being a species of assent, must be determined by preponderating reasons, is there- fore not in our own power, cannot be voluntary. They farther observe, that a great proportion of Christians assert, and seem to be authorised by Scripture in the assertion, that Faith is the ex- clusive gift of God, and consequently is not in 12 116 our own power, cannot be voluntary. But, say they, to make that which is not in our own power the meritorious condition of salvation is unjust, to make that which is not within the sphere of our will the object of exhortation and persuasion is absurd, and the system which does so cannot with propriety be considered as divine. I have stated the objection as stronglyas I could, because I think it may be a means of impressing on your memories the answer I propose to give to it, and may incite you to turn your own minds to the subject, to search the Scriptures, and to supply whatever may appear to be deficient in my mode of answer. The manner in which I shall meet it is this, first, by shewing that all kinds of as- sent, and Christian Faith more than any other, are in a great measure voluntary : secondly, that though God be author and finisher of our Faith, it is our own part to maintain and cherish it ; and thirdly, that it is described in Scripture, rather as the instrument or means used by God for our salvation, than as any meritorious cause or condition, whereby we become justly entitled to it. With respect to the first of these, I have to remind you of the remark of a well known au- thor, that our assent is partly necessary, partly voluntary. Even the assent which the strictest mathematical demonstration commands will not exist, if we withhold what is perfectly in ou 117 own power, namely, our attention from the proofs, or refrain from the voluntary exertion of our intellect in comprehending them and sa- tisfying ourselves as to their connection. But this is an extreme case. In matters of proba- bility the sphere of the will becomes much wider, the proofs to be considered are indefinitely mul- tiplied, the connection between them imper- fectly seen, and therefore capable of being ar- bitrarily appreciated. Were the assent to be de- termined, in such cases, necessarily by prepon- derating reasons, all men of equal intellect and equal opportunities of observation would form the same conclusions on the same subjects, which we all know is by no means the fact. The truth is, it is not so much from our oppor- tunities of information, as from the voluntary use which we make of those opportunities, it is not so much from our sagacity of intellect, as from the voluntary use we make of that sagacity, it is not so much from the preponderancy of reasons, as from the appearance of preponde- rancy, which our passions, those varied emotions of the human will, can occasionally give to them, that we form our conclusions in matters of pro- bability. — And in matters of religious proba- bility, how much more powerful must be the influence of passion. — On a subject so totally unconnected with worldly interest or worldly wis- dom, how much wider must be the range of the 118 will in the investigation of reasons, and the ex- ertion of intellect ? In other matters of proba- bility, the urgent necessity of action forces us in a manner to a speedy decision, and interest impels us to make the best use of our opportu- nities, the greatest exertion of our intellect. But in matters of religion, we can fancy a slighter enquiry may suffice, or perhaps that we may defer it entirely to some more convenient season. Our voluntary power of suspending our assent is greater in those matters, than in any others. And if we do apply ourselves to the enquiry, our passions, our pride, our self sufficiency, the lusts of our own hearts, are in arms against the reception of religious truth. Whether we encourage those passions or whe- ther we struggle with them is in our own power, the grace of God is offered to us, to enable us to come off victorious ; but whether we hear or whether we forbear, whether we submit our- selves to the guidance of the Holy Spirit, or whether we receive him in vain, resist and grieve him, is our voluntary act. If therefore we ad- mit our assent to any abstract matter of proba- bility to be partly voluntary, because our appli- cation to the proofs, the exertion of our facul- ties, and the regulation of the interference of passion are in our own power, we must on all these grounds admit, that religious faith is in a much higher degree a voluntary act.— But, say 119 the objectors, you yourselves assert Faith to be the gift of God, how then can it be voluntary ? —Without doubt our Scriptures do describe God as the author and finisher of our Faith, but they also repeatedly call on us to hold fast the profession of our Faith, to keep our Faith pure and undefiled, to stand fast in the Faith, to hold the beginning of our confidence stead- fast unto the end ; they speak of men of having made shipwreck of their Faith ; expressions, which when compared with each other evidently imply, that although Faith be the gift of God, it is our part, our duty, and consequently in our power, to maintain and cherish it; that it is a talent committed to our charge, the preser- vation and encrease of which we must give an account of, as though it had been to an austere master. It is the seed sown in our hearts, of which though God be the sower, it depend:, upon the soil whether it be sown in vain, or whether it bring forth fruit ; and yet if it do bring forth fruit, it is God that giveth the en- crease. — There are many, I had almost said all, of the gifts of God, which are of exactly a si- milar character. Though the utmost art and labour of the husbandman could not create a single blade of grass, it is left to his power, to his voluntary choice, whether he will preserve or neglect the harvest which divine bounty has placed before him. Though our intellectual fa- 120 culties be the gift of God, and none of their glorious fruits could ever exist but for him, yet it is our own voluntary act whether we will im- prove them or indolently suffer them to waste away. Even our very life itself, though in its origin and preservation it be the gift of God, yet depends on ourselves whether we will retain or whether we will destroy it. In the same way, though Faith be the gift of God, yet the main- taining of that Faith is partly our own volun- tary act. And being voluntary, (in order that we may come to the next part of the objection) there can be no injustice in making it a condi- tion of our salvation, an instrument for effecting it, nor no absurdity in its being the object of exhortation and persuasion. With respect to our Faith being a meritorious condition of sal- vation, an act for which we are rewarded by eternal life, that we neither assert, nor even admit ; nor are we any where in Scripture told, that we are saved for our Faith. The expression is, by our Faith, through our Faith ; a form of lan- guage which evidently indicates Faith to be the means, the instrument used in arresting the progress of moral corruption in our hearts, and destroying the reign of sin in our members. It by no means implies, that Faith is any merit, for which we are rewarded, for which we be- come justly and intrinsically entitled to salva- tion. We are saved for the merits of Christ, 121 and through the instrumentality of our Faith in his blood. In those merits, in that Redeemer we can have no part, except we wish, except we hope, except we believe that we have : for except we so believe, that love by which Faith is described as working will be wanting. In this respect Christian Faith admits perhaps of greater fluctuations, of more progressive variety, than in any other. Being the vital principle of the new man, of the child of God, it grows with his growth and strengthens with his strength. Beginning in anxiety, it goes on to hope j from hope it rises to expectation ; from expectation to belief: I had almost said, to conviction. — But let no man presume to describe beyond his own experience. It strengthens with his strength. — Every triumph over temptation, every salvation from sin, every holy thought, every just work conveys to his heart unspeakable com- fort, and additional assurance to his faith, by being a proof to him, that he is an object of the love of God, that he has a part in his Re- deemer. This would naturally lead me to the last head of my subject, " what is the criterion by which " we may best ascertain whether we be in the " faith ?" But as the limitation of time would prevent me from entering into it so fully as its importance would demand, I shall defer its 122 consideration to some future opportunity. — Now may the God of all grace, who hath called us unto his eternal glory by Christ Jesus, make you perfect, stablish, strengthen, settle you. To him be glory and dominion for ever and ever. SERMON IX. L Corinthians, xiii.— 5. Examine yourselves whether ye be in the Faith. Prove your own selves. Know ye not that Christ Jesus is in you, except ye be repro- bates ? I HAVE proved to you, I trust, in a former discourse, that Christian Faith consists in a be- lief of the divinity of Christ, a recognition of his authority, and a confidence in his mercy. Therefore, though the enquiry whether we be 123 in the faith, naturally presupposes, that we re- ceive the Scriptures as the revelation of God, though it be evident, that if we deny them, the enquiry is ended ; — yet, on the other hand, the mere admission of their authority does not ne- cessarily evince, that we are in the faith. Be- cause there have been, and unfortunately yet are, many, who though they admit the authen- ticity of the Bible, are yet deficient in some, if not all, the characteristics of Christian Faith. The enquiry therefore presents itself to such as do admit the divine authority of the Bible, whether they have that faith which is necessary for salvation. One mode of investigation, and perhaps that which is most frequently applied to, is to en- quire what are the speculative tenets of Chris- tianity, how its mysteries are to be understood, how both are to be accommodated to the re- ceived systems of human philosophy, and to ask ourselves do we believe them, do we ac- quiesce in these received explications ? We imagine there is no intermediate state of the mind between belief and rejection, and if we find nothing in these tenets which we are in- clined to deny, we fancy we are in the faith. — If, on the other hand, we meet with any thing which is inconsistent with our preconceived opinions, we attempt to prove that this cannot 124 be the meaning of Scripture, we reconcile it, by some ingenious explication, to our own system ; and while perhaps we wrest it to our destruction, we still persuade ourselves we are in the faith. — And in order to satisfy ourselves of the com- parative rectitude of our belief, of our spiritual superiority oves the rest of the world, we pro- ceed to apply our standard to measure the faith of others. This, my fellow Christians, to say the best of it, may be philosophy, but it is not religion.— We are no where told that except we understand all mysteries, except we have all knowledge, we cannot be saved. What Saint Paul says on that point is something very dif- ferent from this. — No, my fellow Christians, the Gospel was preached to the poor, the tid- ings of exceeding joy are written so that he who runs may read. — Mysteries there undoubt- edly are in the nature of God and his relation towards his creatures. — These may occasionably be alluded to in the Scripture, but the under- standing them is no where declared to be a con- dition of salvation. Hear what Christ saith in his conference with Nicodemus. " God so " loved the world, that he gave his only be- u gotten Son, that whosoever believed on " him should not perish, but have everlasting " life." And again, " This is the will of him " that sent me, that every one that believ- " eth on the Son may have everlasting life." 125 And again, " He that believeth on me hath " everlasting life." — Here we find no intricacy of speculation described,— it is not the exertion of a strong imagination, nor the labour of an acute understanding which is called for, but the exercise of an humble belief, But what are we to believe ? What is the proposition to which we are to give our assent ? " Believe me," saith our blessed Lord to Philip, " that I am in the " Father, and the Father in me." — " If," saith Saint Paul, "thou shalt confess with thy mouth " the Lord Jesus, and believe in thine heart " that God hatli raised him from the dead, thou " shalt be saved." In these passages, and many others of a similar description, which declare the efficacy of faith towards salvation, and the nature of the propositions which form its spe- culative part, there is nothing abstruse. We are called on to believe the fact, not to be able to explain the manner in which it took place. This last is no where said to be necessary for salvation. — God forbid it should, for if we can- not attain to the full knowledge of the humblest part of God's material creation, how shall we expect to comprehend the unspeakable glories of its infinite Creator ? What we are called on to assent to, as conditionally requisite for sal- vation, is simple as to fact ; That Christ was sent by the Father, was the Son of God, was one with the Father, that God raised him from 126 the dead. — These are, as to fact, propositions on a level with the meanest capacities. The ex- plication of how these things can be is a totally different matter, and as unconnected with Chris- tian faith, as it is above the reach of human in- tellect. Mark our Saviour's reply to Nicode- mus. He had declared to him the necessity of being born again, or as it might have been translated, being born from above •, — and in an- swer to his objecting question, " How can these " things be ?" by no means attempts to ex- plain how they are, but leaves merely the mat- ter of fact for his belief, and expresses his won- der, that a man who was a master in Israel, and was therefore used to the consideration of the things which be of God, should not receive it. Why did our Saviour neglect explaining to him the manner of this regeneration ? Perhaps because it cannot be explained to human hearers, perhaps because it can be known only in its ef- fects. And most assuredly if it cannot, and at all events has not been explained, the under- standing of it cannot be requisite for salvation. The same remark will apply to many other mys- teries of our religion ; they have not been ex- plained in Scripture, therefore the understand- ing them cannot be requisite for salvation. Let us not therefore refer to any such mystic intri- cacies of speculation for ascertaining whether we be in the faith. Open your Bibles, turn to the 127 passages which describe what we are called on to assent to, and you will find that I have quoted the principal of them, and that the rest are ex- pressed in nearly the same words, and I believe they will satisfy you, that speculation forms but a very small proportion of Christianity. If we refer to what I stated to be the second of the characteristics of Christian faith, namely, the recognition of the authority and compe- tency of Christ as a legislator, at first view it appears to contribute but little towards a crite- rion for examining ourselves, whether we be in the faith, and to be merely tantamount to the speculative admission of his divinity. Every one will be ready to ask, how can any who ad- mit that Christ is God, hesitate as to the obli- gation or sufficiency of those rules of life which he has left us ? And yet, my fellow Christians, strange as it may sound, I fear that this is very possible. I fear it is possible to abstain from denying Christ with our lips, to fancy we do not deny him in our hearts, though we refuse to take his easy yoke and light burden upon us. — I fear there may be a speculative faith which is not a believing with the heart unto righte- ousness. But perhaps you will say this is the general declamation, which we every day hear, against 128 the depravity of the age.— No, my fellow Chris- tians, I will not deal in generals, in abstract considerations of our admission or rejection of the competency of Christ's commandments for the regulation of life ; let us descend to parti- cular instances. Christ hath said, " Resist not " evil. Love your enemies. Do good to them '* that hate you. Bless them that curse you. " Pray for them that despitefully use you and " persecute you."— Could he have used stronger language, to prohibit the indulgence of resent- ment ? And yet, do all, who profess and call themselves Christians, receive these precepts as the rules of their conduct ? How many will tell you, that they cannot be understood liter- ally ! — that, so, they would be totally incon- sistent with the present state of society ! — that they are merely strong forms of language, figu- rative expressions, which mean only, that we should not be very vindictive, that we should not resort to the utmost means of revenge, which the laws of civilised or polished society would authorise, and certainly, that we should not go beyond them ! Ask these men, are they in the faith ? They will be indignant at the implication of the question, and yet they will tell you, that society cannot be carried on, un- der what appears to be the principles of the Gospel ; they will connect them with ideas of debased spirit, and degraded character, and 129 perhaps will rise from the very table of the Lord with feelings of hatred unsubdued, determina- tions of resentment unbroken. But perhaps I am drawing an ideal picture. — Look round you, my friends, into the world,— or, rather, look every one of you into his own heart. — You no doubt are in the faith, — you have approved the things which are most excel- lent, — are qualified for being guiders of the blind, and lights to those who sit in darkness.— Do you indeed believe ? Perhaps the time is now ap- proaching, — no one can say how near it can be, when you will fly from the party of your Re- deemer. — To-morrow, — this moment, should in- jury or insult be offered to you, slight I fear must that injury be, — trivial that insult, which would not sink deeper into your hearts, than the authority of your God. — And do you yet believe ? — Trust me, there are few instances, in which it is more apparent, that the friendship of the world is enmity with God, — few stronger instances of the law in our members waring against the law of the spirit, — few more discri- minating tests of whether we be in the faith. — Look into your own hearts, my fellow Chris- tians. — If any one of you feels, that he could meet the contempt and scorn of the world, by laying his injuries unresent^tl, his honorable feelings of wounded pride unvindicated, con- vol. r. K 130 scientiously and sincerely at the feet of his Re- deemer, let him be assured, that he is not far from the kingdom of God. But are there not other particulars, in which we may try our recognition of the authority of Christ ? If we abstain from the various crimes against society, if we be regular in the discharge of our prescribed religious exercises, if we be- stow our goods to feed the poor, if we be ready to give our bodies to martyrdom, are we not in the faith ? Do we not thereby recognise the au- thority of Christ ? Without doubt these are va- luable tests — on one side. If they be absent, our faith is absent also. — If they be only par- tial, our faith can be only weak. — But, on the other hand, they may be present without the existence of that faith, which they would seem to indicate. — Worldly prudence, affectation of public opinion, party zeal may occasionally pre- sent fruits, which, to the incautious eye, may bear the semblance of those of the spirit ; and where different motives are joined, or may be joined, in producing an effect, it is not always easy to determine to which we are principally to refer it. We should therefore, in this exami- nation of ourselves, rather look to those kinds of obedience, in which worldly considerations cannot interfere, and still more to those against which they directly militate. Would we wish 131 to know whether we recognise the authority of Christ, let us ask ourselves, do we love our bro- ther, with that active anxiety for his spiritual welfare, which, to be influential, — must be un- ostentatious ; with that bounty towards his tem- poral wants, which, to avoid being injurious to industry, must be secret ; that benevolent wish for his temporal convenience and happiness, which leads us to the unobstrusive practice of doing unto others as we would they should do unto us, in circumstances, where we would neither be praised for doing, nor blamed for ne- glecting. These are matters, in which worldly considerations do not interfere, in which pub- lic affection, if such a principle there be in the natural heart of man, is balanced by indolence and self love. — They are therefore well fitted for being marks of our recognition of the autho- rity of Christ.— But those, which I have men- tioned before, are still more appropriate ; where the voice of the world joins in alliance with the most resistless passions of our hearts, and mili- tates directly against the law of God.— The one may be sufficient for ascertaining the existence of the principle, but the other must measure its strength and superiority. To these means of judging whether we be in the faith, which result from our conduct and practical sentiments in our intercourse with the k 2 1.32 world, evidencing whether we recognise the au- thority of Christ, in act, as well as in profes- sion, whether we draw nigh unto him with our lips only, while our hearts are far from him, we may add others, derived from what I have stated to be the third part of the description of Chris- tian Faith, namely, confidence in the mercy of God. Though this perhaps might at first view appear to be difficult to ascertain, as being less immediately connected with external exertion, yet when we consider how totally different it is from all our other sentiments, how powerfully it is capable of influencing them, we perceive that its presence is an easy and obvious object of mental observation. — Its influence on our other sentiments cannot well be mistaken. To that love of God, which originates in admira- tion, and is cherished by gratitude, it gives that perfection and vigour, by which the Apostle describes it as casting out fear. From that anxiety, which the wants and dangers of this life produce, it takes the sting which destroys our contentment, and the poison which cor- rupts our hearts. He that relies on the mercy of God is re- signed to the dispensations of Providence, whe- ther the Lord giveth, or the Lord taketh away, he blesseth the name of the Lord, and expe- riences the truth of the Apostle's assertion, that 133 godliness is great riches. Will such a man ever resort to forbidden sources, for providing for his wants, or to unchristian means, for protect- ing himself from aggression ? But confidence in the mercy of God has a still higher object, it carries the believer's eye beyond the bounds of this present world, his heart beyond the gratitude for temporal pro- tection, — beyond the hope which is in this life, to that which is to come. He beholds the trans- gressions of those that believe blotted out, their sanctification produced, their eternal glory en- sured, by the promises of God who cannot lie. He receives these promises, he believes in them, he trusts in them, he lays hold on the hope which is set before him. — This is the confidence which deprives the world of that poison by which it would corrupt the heart. This is the victory which overcometh the world. He that hath this hope in him, purifies himself even as his Saviour is pure. — Knowing that God hath ordained him to walk in righteousness, he keeps his eye fixed on the glorious path. — To what temptation should he yield ? His God is with him, who will not suffer him to be tempted above that which he is able, but will with the temptation, also make a way whereby he may escape. — There is no firmer support in the struggle with sin, there can be no stronger incentive to exertion, than 134 confidence of victory. The bankrupt whose debts are cancelled, who sees in his former mis- fortune no clog on his future industry, no ob- stacle to future success, but rather a beacon to warn him from misconduct, — applies to his worldly pursuits with renovated vigour, with re- doubled energy. And will not the Christian, whose transgressions are blotted out, in whom past suffering of sin has generated experience of the mercy of God, in whom this experience has produced hope of future mercy and ripened it into confidence, will not he give all diligence to make his calling and election sure ? He who trusts that much is forgiven to him, the same will love much, he will not be content with mere abstinence from sin, he will not be satis- fied with washing his hands in innocency, but will also go to the sanctuary of the Lord, that he may behold the bright example for his imita- tion, him whose mercy is overall his works, who is the Father of the fatherless, the friend of wi- dows, who looseth men out of prison, even God in his holy habitation. Yes, my fellow Chris- tians, the assurance of God's love naturally pro- duces love towards him, and this as naturally generates an anxious desire to please, a fervent wish to imitate, and he that hath this hope in him, not only purifies himself as He is pure, but also endeavours to be perfect, even as He is perfect. 135 Behold here, my fellow Christians, the cri- terion of faith which I would establish. Behold how its parts naturally combine with, and indi- cate each other. The love of God shed abroad into your hearts, evidenced by purity of life, and appreciated by active good will to mankind, directing our attention principally to those in- stances of conduct, where that obedience, that patient continuance in well doing can proceed from no other source.— Originating in senti- ment, seated in the inward man, it is the ap- propriate object of self examination. Expressing itself in outward conduct where other sentiments are not likely to intermingle in producing that conduct, there is the less chance of our being deceived, so long as we confine the enquiry to ourselves. And to ourselves alone it belongs, we cannot, we ought not to extend it to others. Of their outward conduct we can judge but im- perfectly, of their inward sentiments, scarcely from even their own professions. Be assured that the wish for estimating the faith of others, of seeking a criterion by which we may exclude them, rather than by which we may examine ourselves, arises from a Pharisaical spirit, and is injurious to the cause of religion. Let us therefore ask ourselves, whether we love our Redeemer ?— If we do not, we assuredly are not in the faith, for faith worketh by love. — If we do, we assuredly are, for Christ saith, " if a 156 " man love me, my Father will love him, and " we will come unto him, and take up our " abode with him." If we think we love our God, let us ask ourselves, do we love our bro- ther also ? for if we do not, we have deceived ourselves in our former opinion. — " He that " loveth not his brother is not of God." — Let us ask ourselves have we kept the command- ments of God ? for Christ hath said, " if a man " love me he will keep my sayings Paul de- scribes the faith unto which we are called, as a " faith unto obedience and James declares, that by works, is faith made perfect. Let us ask ourselves, are we given over to a reprobate mind ? Do we feel that professing to know God, in works we deny him, being disobedient, and to every good work reprobate ? God gave over the old world to a reprobate mind, because they held the truth in unrighteousness j if we be not so, no doubt our salvation is due to our Re- deemer's love. Know ye not that Christ Jesus is in you, except ye be reprobates ? I anticipate your remarks. — This is all com- mon place, what we all know. — I trust it is. — It is the language of the Bible. — I trust that daily use has made you familiar with it ; — yet, nevertheless, most anxiously do I call your at- tention to it. — There are many things which we all well know, and yet in our familiarity with 137 them, forget their importance. — Let me there- fore entreat you, ever to bear in mind the en- quiry whether you be in the faith. It is not the investigation of a day, it should be the business of your lives. Mistaken is the man, who ima- gines, that his faith once established, flourishes constantly with unchanged vigour. It varies from day to day, it strengthens with our strength, and fails with our weakness, fluctu- ating through the varieties of assent, and the reciprocations of hope. — Bear the enquiry about with you continually, in the activity of life, in the seclusion of solitude, never lose sight of it. In temptation it will supply you with a most powerful motive for resistance, in prosperity it will gift you with sober-mindness, in misfortune it will inspire you with resignation. May the God of all grace, who hath called us unto his eternal glory by Christ Jesus, make you perfect, stablish, strengthen, settle you. To him be glory and dominion, for ever and ever. DONNELAN LECTURES FOR THE YEAR 1816. LECTURE [. I. Corinthians, i. — 21. For after that, in the wisdom of God, the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God, by the foolishness of preaching, to save them tliat believe. THOUGH the great object of religious en- quiry with every man ought to be his own hopes individually of salvation, the means which have been afforded to him, and the use which he may make of these means ; though the great 139 question, which he should always have in view, be, what shall J do that I may inherit eternal life ? Yet still a propensity to enquire concern- ing the salvation of others has been always pre- valent among mankind. This may arise sometimes from a spiritual pride, which feels gratified when we persuade ourselves, that our means and opportunities are superior to these the of generality of mankind. It may proceed from a sentiment allied to that Pharisaical spirit, which would lead us to glory before our God, " that we are not as other men." Originating from such causes, the en- quiry and its principles are alike dangerous, for while they lead us to a false security in our- selves, they are inconsistent with Christian hu- mility, they are inconsistent with Christian cha- rity, that charity, which, if it be genuine, ne- ver faileth. The enquiry, however, may proceed from a different, and a praise-worthy source. If it ori- ginate from a desire of strengthening our own conviction and that of others, that the dispen. sation, which we preach, is of God ; of prov- ing to gainsayers, that it is strictly accordant with that universal mercy, that unbounded love, that unrestricted justice, that infinite wisdom, Avhich the heart of man naturally and innately 140 seeks to ascribe to the object of his adoration ; then indeed, the enquiry, deriving a value from its principle, becomes capable of producing the noblest fruits, joy, and peace, and gratitude, glory to God, and good will to mankind. Such, I trust, are the motives, which influ- ence me in the enquiry, which I now propose to enter on. And if I can satisfy you, that the various degrees of religious information, which have been, from time to time, vouchsafed to mankind, were such as were best suited to their moral state at the peculiar period of each dis- pensation, I trust it may be of service, in ob- viating objections to revealed religion, from its not having been at once general, and at once perfect. If I can shew, that, consistently with the general providence of God, revelation ought to be gradual, and consequently, at first par- tial and imperfect, growing with the growth of society, and proportioned to its circumstances ; and that the revelation, which we preach, has been so ; I trust it may serve to strengthen our conviction, that that revelation is of divine ori- inal. There is however a very generally received opinion, which, if well founded, would render the investigation I have proposed to enter on, superfluous. I must therefore make it the sub- 141 ject of preparatory enquiry, namely, that which would maintain the sufficiency of human rea- son to lead us to the knowledge of God, and of our duty. — If it be sufficient, the infidel may well ask, why was any farther aid, why was any miraculous revelation given to mankind ? And we shall in vain seek for the traces of divine beneficence and wisdom, in proportioning the degree of that revelation to the circumstances of the recipient. The first view of the subject would seem to be rather favourable to this opinion. We find the ancient philosophers forming theories con- cerning the nature of God, some of which are not entirely inconsistent with revelation. — We find them framing systems of moral duty, which still more nearly approach to that law which is holy, just, and good. Among the moderns, we meet with demonstrations of the existence and nature of God, which profess to be inde- pendent of Scripture, and to conclude with ma- thematical certainty. — This conviction by rea- son is even held by some to be a prerequisite ground-work for our reception of revelation.— We find also systems of Ethics grounded on the nature of man, and the divine attributes so es- tablished, to which revelation would appear to be only subsidiary, — and with which, to the in- fidel it seems superfluous. 142 Has reason, unassisted reason, performed all this ? The opinion is a dangerous one, let us not embrace it without examination. — It is dan- gerous, I say, to hold that man can of himself arrive at the knowledge of his duty, for some might think that the deficiency of theory, name- ly sanction, might be supplied by civil society. — It is dangerous to hold, that reason can of itself, lead us to the knowledge of God, and must do so before we can receive revelation ; for those, on whose minds the absolute conclusive- ness of the demonstration does not strike, may thereby make shipwreck of their faith. If we consider that uncultivated state of so- ciety, which seems to have been the earliest lot of all the nations of antiquity, we shall per- haps be led to think that theories concerning the being and nature of God were not very likely to arise among them from the sole force of unassisted reason. — Man, incessantly em- ployed in providing for his natural wants, in contesting with the beasts of the field for his safety and subsistence, is little likely to theorise. — If the magnificence of nature be oft unheed. en even by civilized man, if with brute uncon- scious gaze, he mark not the mighty hand that moves the whole, much less does the savage.— Savage life is remarkable for the absence of cu- riosity, or that wonder which prompts to en- 143 quiry. — For speculative research, that progress of civilization is necessary, which confers on some individuals an exemption from labour. — Leisure, in fact, is the mother of philosophy. Now let us consider society as something far- ther advanced, and we shall find that even then unassisted reason is not likely to lead man to the knowledge and obedience of God, if there were no previous information concerning him. — Rea- son never acts without being excited. — The ne- cessities of life have stimulated her to the inven- tion of the various arts, whether by abstract research, or by availing herself of accidental observation. — The cultivation of the arts has led to the various mathematical sciences. — The ambition of dispute has produced logics and her subsidiary attendants. — But where shall we find a stimulus to excite reason to the consideration of the question, whether there be a superior power, and what are our duties towards such, except we presuppose the remnant of some tra- dition, however obscure, relative to the reveal- ed existence of such a being ? The question then addresses itself to the curiosity of the phi- losopher, how far such tradition is accordant with the dictates of reason.— Reason, I say, left to itself would never invent a God, for there would be nothing to direct it to the enquiry. Even aided by obscure tradition, the question belongs to the curiosity of philosophic leisure, o 144 not to the occupations and active life of the vulgar. It is the revealed interference of God in this present life, and the revealed exercise of his dominion beyond the grave, which make the question concerning his being of importance to mankind in general. — Take away these, and you remove the general interest ; take away tra- dition, and you remove even the excitement to philosophical curiosity. But is not this reasoning contradicted by his- torical fact ? Had not all nations of whom we have any account, some idea, however imper- fect, of a God ? Did not many of the ancient philosophers devise theories concerning the Deity, which nearly approach the truth ? With- out doubt they had, without doubt they did. And it is most worthy of remark, that those na- tions, which emerged most early from the un- cultivated state, and in which consequently phi- losophical enquiry was removed by the shortest interval from that period, which the Scriptures state to be one of general revelation to man- kind in the persons of Noah and his family, those nations, I say, had the purest ideas of the Deity, and their philosophers and those who learned from them, the truest theories concern- ing his nature. — A remark, which immediately points out to us the source of whatever truth, whatever excellence, those theories contain, 145 and also converts their existence into a most powerful argument in favour of the point I seek to establish, that unassisted unexcited reason does not theorise concerning a Deity, that the natural man receiveth not the things 'which be of God, nei- ther indeed can he.— The kingdom of Upper Egypt, which was established considerably prior to that of Lower, possessed a theology which was much less erroneous.— Its Priests held the unity of God, and did not worship idols, while those of the Lower were proverbial for the gross- ness of their idolatry. — Whence this difference ? The inhabitants of Lower Egypt appear to have been a wiser and more ingenious people ; to them Greece owed, in a great measure, the origin of her legislation, and her science.— If reason alone were concerned in forming theolo- gical theories, we should expect that theirs would be most perfect. — But the others had be- gun earlier ; — at a period when the original Re- velation was less remote, and consequently less forgotten, and less corrupted.— In the same way the Persians, who were one of the most ancient nations, possessed a theology so pure, that when Zoroaster, who is said by some to have been the disciple of Ezra, reformed their religion, he had not much to change. — And yet his system contained the existence of one supreme mer- ciful and righteous God j — he taught, that there would be a general resurrection, and a day of VOL. It L 146 judgment, wherein just retribution shall be ren- der ed to all according to their works j — and all this is stated to have been rather the revival of the old theory, than the addition of any thing new.— Compare this system with these of Greece, polished, learned, and wise ; — with those of Rome, the mistress of the world. — Be- hold whatever of truth those of Greece con- tained, borrowed from Eastern instruction ;— behold those of Rome derived from Grecian teaching ; — and assign, if you can, a reason for the superiority, except that the Persians were nearer to the source of truth, except that the tradition of revelation, and not the acuteness of reason, be the real origin of religious know- ledge. But have not the moderns given us demon- strations on these matters perfectly independent of revelation, by the mere force of reason ? — On this part of the subject it is to be remarked, that there is a wide difference between being able to accommodate to the dictates of reason a truth, which we already know by other means, and reasons being sufficient to lead us to the enquiry concerning this, truth, and the means for satisfying it. We should also consider, what the nature of the reasoning is, which has been advanced on this subject.— If it be only such as leads to a high degree of probability, its pro- 147 vince would seem to be rather to shew the rea- sonableness of a truth already delivered to us, than to engage in any original investigation. — If it be such as shall carry with it demonstrative certainty sufficient to produce general convic- tion, its premises ought to be self evident, not with probability, but with certainty; not to some minds, but to all minds.— The first step of the argument is, that the material world and the succession of mankind cannot have been eter- nal. — This we know to be true from revelation, but would we know it without revelation ? — It would be highly probable, but would it be cer- tain ? — It may be self evident to the minds of some, but has it been so to all ? — We find many of the Pythagoreans, we find Aristotle and his followers, we find the followers of Plato, and it is doubted whether we may not add Plato him- self, holding a contrary opinion, and proving, from the preestablished eternity of God, that the world, as being the necessary effect of an eternal cause, must itself be eternal. — How then did they arrive at the knowledge of the being of a God ! — not from reason, for the rea- son which Cicero assigns, namely, " there must must be something superior to man, and this superior we call a God," is plainly a petitio prin- cipii, not from reason, I say, but from Eastern tradition, to which we know they had access. — Another of the premises of the argument, to l « 148 which I allude, is, that we must either admit one first cause, or an infinite succession of causes, which last it states to be absurd, and to prove it so, recourse is had to reasonings ground- ed on the nature of infinity, a subject probably above all human comprehensions, and confes- sedly above those of the generality of mankind, and therefore unfitted for general use, reason- ings which might seem to common minds, equal- ly to prove, that there could be no infinite du- ration, nor infinite space. — If then one of the premises of this argument be such as not to have been self evident to a great proportion of the most learned of mankind ; and another be one whose proof involves ideas above general comprehension, — what becomes of the boasted all-sufficiency of unassisted reason for leading man to the knowledge of God ? — It may per- haps be of use to remember, that the philoso- phers of antiquity by no means overlooked the argument taken from the consideration of the universe. They were not prevented from mak- ing the use of it, it has since been applied to, by ignorance, or carelessness, but seem to have been fully sensible of its real scope ; — I mean, the shewing the reasonableness of a truth al- ready suggested. — In a passage of Aristotle preserved by Cicero, we find him supposing the imaginary case of a number of rational beings, educated, cultivated, arrived at the maturity of 149 reason, in subterranean habitations, and having been merely told that there were Gods. — If these, says he, were on a sudden, brought forth to behold the beauties of the earth, the glories of the firmament, the splendid order of the universe, without doubt they would be imme- diately persuaded, that what they had heard was true, and that the world, which they be- held, was the workmanship of those superior beings. Here, he evidently points out, that a previous intimation of the being of a Deity is necessary to prepare the human mind for the reception of that argument, which, from the consideration of the universe, would persuade us to believe that intimation, and to acknow- ledge the goodness and wisdom of the Creator. — And here we may proceed to a much higher au- thority, I mean that of Saint Paul, who describ- ing, in his Epistle to the Romans, the state of the old world, adverts to this very argument as one which was offered by God to mankind, for making manifest, not his being, but his power, and divi- nity. God (saith he) hath made it manifest to them, for the invisible things of him are clearly seen from the creation of the world, being un. derstood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and divinity.— -Here the Aposlle does not represent mankind as arriving at the being of God by ratiocination, but on the con. trary describes them in a subsequent verse as 150 being vain in their reasonings, as rejecting, not the traditionary belief, which we know they had of his being, and which the Apostle evidently presupposes, but the partial manifestation of his attributes, which the material world afford- ed them. For this is obviously the meaning of holding the truth in unrighteousness, becoming vain in their reasonings, changing the truth of God into a lie, not liking to retain God in their knowledge. And the passage, which I have chosen for my text, expressly declares, that the world by wisdom did not know their God. Perhaps if we consider the nature of human assent, and of the propositions which the know- ledge of God implies, we shall find reason to think, that the world not only did not, but that they could not know God by wisdom ; but, that by preaching, that is by the diffusion of a reve- lation throughout the world, and by that alone, could they be brought to believe unto salva- tion. — The truths to which the human mind as- sents, in the course of its action, are of two kinds, those which concern the existence of ex- ternal beings, the properties of those beings, the actions of those beings ; and secondly, those which concern the relations of our own ideas. This later class is the appropriate province of demonstration, and the certainty we arrive at in it is applicable to external things, only on the 151 supposition of their being conformable to the ideas we have of them. — The former class be- longs to probable proof, the evidences we have in it are our senses, and the testimony of others. No ratiocination however ingenious could con- vince us, with certainty, of the existence of any individual, of whom we had neither the evi- dence of sense, nor of testimony. It might make it highly probable, but still it would be only probability, and a probability totally inca- pable of exciting the same assurance in our minds, which our senses, or unquestionable tes- timony would produce. But if the evidence of sense or testimony have gone before, then the theoretical probability may add tenfold weight to that evidence. Take a particular instance, for general assertions are often best examined by considering them in particular cases. Sup- pose a person were to undertake to prove by theoretical arguments that there must be a great Emperor resident in the midst of Africa, that he was of certain character, and had performed certain actions. We can conceive no ingenuity of argument which could produce certainty. — But it might produce an high degree of proba- bility, a probability, however, which could ne- ver equal that which would arise from the tes- timony of a number of witnesses of unimpeached character, whose opportunities of observation were proved to have been sufficient, by their 152 bringing with them the language and arts of the country, by their possessing a knowledge and a power, which they could not elsewhere have ac- quired.— After this would come the proper place for speculative argument, to shew, if it were thought useful, that the fact, which they declared, was not only possible, but even highly probable. It is a point, I believe, which will be easily admitted, that the nature of our knowledge de- pends in a great measure on the nature of our ideas ; that where our ideas are obscure, inde- finite, and imperfect, our science cannot be complete. We at once perceive that the ex- istence, character, and actions of an individual man, of which we may have comparatively clear ideas, are the appropriate objects of testimony, not of demonstration. — Shall we then expect to be able to establish by argument possessing ma- thematical certainty, and independant of reve- lation, the existence, and character of a being, of whom our ideas are, and must be, most im- perfect. How imperfect they are, the supporters of such theories themselves declare to us. His du- ration excludes the idea of succession, his im- mensity excludes extension, even his moral at- tributes are not what their names would express 153 in the common use of language. And yet in- volving these indefinite, these incomplete ideas, they have devised a chain of reasoning, which they think concludes with mathematical cer- tainty, independant, prerequisite, and therefore superior to, the evidence of Scripture. — They are not however entirely agreed on the deduc- tions from this reasoning ; some maintain that it establishes the unity of God ; others hold that there might be a plurality of independent beings. They disagree also in some other respects, on which I shall not now enter, farther than to re- mark, that, we never find different commenta- tors deducing contradictory corrollaries from the same mathematical proposition. I have dwelt thus long on the opinion of the self sufficiency of reason ; not only as prepara- tory to my subject, but also because I think it a most dangerous one. — It is dangerous. — It has been injurious.— What led the Gnostics, those earliest of heretics, to hold opinions which they themselves admitted were no where expressed in Scripture, and to seek for authority in ab- surdly mystical expositions of parts of Scripture, which bear not the slightest obvious relation to the doctrines in question ? — What but the opi- nion, that the word of God should be grounded on the wisdom of man, and his revelation ac- commodated to philosophical system ? — What J 54 made shipwreck of the faith of Socinus, and drove him to seek, in tlie beginning of John's Gospel! ! for arguments against the divinity of our Saviour ? — What forced Priestly to deny the inspiration of Scripture, to discredit its history, to despise its reasoning, to depreciate the evi- dence of prophecy ? — What but because they in- dependently made a God for themselves, — and, measuring the Almighty by the measures of a man, they esteemed the incarnation of Jesus, and the obvious scriptural account of God, as unworthy the dignity of the idol of their imagi- nations ? — What led Clarke to disbelieve the Scripture doctrine of the Trinity ? It was his demonstration. — He did not see how to accom- modate his demonstration of the unity, to the obvious meaning of Scripture, therefore he sought to accommodate Scripture to his demon- stration.— Perhaps were we to examine the opi- nions of some other sectarists, in the same point of view, we should find, that their errors arose from a similar source, from forming premature ideas of God, and seeking, by a perversion of Scripture, to establish an ideal being in the seat of the most Holy.— Be assured, my fellow Chris- tians, that testimony is the appropriate evidence of fact; that revelation is the appropriate ground of faith ;— that unassisted independant reason never could arrive at the knowledge of our Creator.— /That every good gift is from the 155 Father of light, and above all, that most excel- lent of gifts, to know thee, oh God. — Yes, my fellow Christians, search the Scriptures, for those are they, that testify of him. They are profitable for doctrine, for instruction. — They are perfect, converting the soul. — They are sure, giving wisdom unto the simple. — Now to God, &c. LECTURE II. I. Corinthians, iii. — 10, 11. Let every man take care how he buildeth thereon, for other foundation can no man lay, save that which is laid in Jesus Christ. I ENDEAVOURED, in my last address to you, my fellow Christians, to combat the opi- nion, that unaided, unenlightened human rea- 156 son is, of itself, all sufficient to lead us to the knowledge of God. — In my present, I shall en- deavour to convince you, that it is also inade- quate to direct us to the rules of duty. It is requisite I should do so, for if reason be of it- self sufficient for the government of passion and the regulation of life, the infidel may with plau- sibility doubt the need of a revealed will of God, and deny the manifestation of Providence in proportioning that revelation to the varying cir- cumstances of mankind. If we admit, as I trust I have satisfied you that we may, that unassisted reason is insuffi- cient to lead us to the knowledge of God, it will afford a strong presumption, or perhaps more than a presumption, that it is also insuffi- cient to lead us to the rules of morality.— My text expressly declares, that other foundation can no man lay, save the word of God. — Even profane authors have borne testimony, that re- ligion is the true foundation of morality. The words of Cicero on this question deserve our attention ; a man whose information, whose op- portunities, whose intellect must give the great- est weight to his opinion. I know not, says he, whether a belief in the gods being removed, justice and temperance and the other virtues will not also be taken away. Cicero surely, if any man, was capable of appreciating the 157 grounds of a system of Ethics. We find him describing successively the various philosophies of antiquity with all the interest of an advocate, so that we can scarcely decide to which he him- self belonged ; a versatility which perhaps arose from his being satisfied with none, from his en- tertaining the same sentiments respecting them, which he expresses concerning one of their best supported opinions. — While I read, says he, I am convinced j when I close the book I relapse into unbelief. — Thus intimately conversant in these boasted structures of human ingenuity, was the man who declares it probable, that re- ligion is the only ground-work of morality. Strong as is the authority both sacred and pro- fane, on this subject, it may be useful to su- peradd the enquiry, what reason has done in this respect, and what she may naturally be sup- posed to be capable of effecting. — It may be useful to convince those who would not attend to the argument from authority, and we may all, in passing, derive this advantage, that when we find that the wisdom of this world is foolish- ness before God, that those, who have departed from the living fountain, have hewed themselves out cisterns, which will hold no water, we may rely more devotedly on that word, which alone is able to make us wise unto salvation, that 158 fountain of living waters, which shall spring up in us unto everlasting life. If the opinions of the ancient philosophers respecting the Deity were in such great vari- ety, as to render the enumeration of them, as Cicero remarks, a matter of difficulty ; — their opinions respecting moral subjects were still more various, still more inconsistent, — the dis- ciple frequently differing from the master he professed to follow, and even the master occa- sionally differing from himself, advancing opi- nions which his principles would not seem to authorize, and which his former opinions appear to contradict ; — so that any attempt at an ac- curate classification of the systems, from the names of their professors, would be hope- less. We may however arrange them according to their foundations and general character. And in this point of view, we shall find three more remarkable classes, first, those which took as their ground work that kind of instinctive per- ception of virtue and vice, which has by the moderns been denominated moral sense ; se- condly, those who reasoned from supposed es- sential differences of actions, intellectually per- ceived ; and thirdly, those who grounded the obligations of morality in the arbitrary will of a 159 superior existence. — To the first class we may generally refer (as Warburton remarks) the school of Plato ; to the second that of Aristotle ; and to the third, the followers of Zeno, a divi- sion more remarkable, as it seems to be nearly applicable to our modern systems. — To these three we may add two others, one, which holds virtue and vice to be merely arbitrary and de- pendant on law and custom ; to this the Cy- renaic school and the Atomists are mostly re- ferable : and another which grounds the obli- gations to moral duty on the natural self love of man, and his innate desire for pleasure or hap- piness, — a system first maintained by Epicurus, but which afterwards, in the hands of his fol- lowers, degenerated most shamefully from a ra- tional beginning, a system to which neverthe- less the best of our modern bears a resemblance in principle, as does the worst to that before mentioned. With the two last, I shall not concern my- self. — The majority of their professors were such men as will scarcely be thought proofs of the excellency of unassisted reason in morality.— The few who were not totally corrupt displayed, according to their contemporaries, that the force of nature was superior to that of philosophical principle, a most wretched reliance surely for virtue. — I shall therefore confine myself to the 160 three former. — They possess many deduced opi- nions in common. — Individuals frequently fluc- tuated between them, and the Ecletic philo- sophy, that philosophy which attempted a com- petition with the infancy of Christianity, was formed by a selection from their various tenets. — They are therefore most proper for examina- tion, in an enquiry into the sufficiency of human reason for the discovery of moral truth and the enforcement of moral duty. I the more readily enter on this part of the subject, as it has been asserted by two writers of considerable character, that there is no evan- gelical precept or duty of Christian practice, which natural men, by mere strength of reason, have not taught — as just and reasonable j — and a similar opinion has been indirectly insinuated by many others. — Let us examine the wisdom which bears such high pretensions. — Its first appearance is highly imposing. Its advocates, like the Ecletics, have collected from every part what was praise-worthy, and possessed a touch- stone, to aid them in the selection, which its antient hearers were not possessed of; I mean a reason regulated, and a heart improved, by the teaching of Gospel morality. They represent it, as considering man as an intellectual and social animal, and all mankind as kinsmen and fellows, not indeed as deriving their origin from 161 one race, but from the same parental mind, of which their minds are so many branches plucked off, directed, according to some, by an instinc- tive love of virtue, according to others, by an intellectual perception of the essential differences of actions, according to a third sect, by the dis- covery of the divine will, which philosophic con- templation deduces from nature; — collecting from these several sources the various virtues which embellish human life, give happiness and dignity to the possessor, originate and close the bonds of society, and render it permanent, se- cure, and tranquil j— recommending to man- kind to be contented with what God allots, to confide in him, to be devoted to his commands. — " The mind of the universe," say the Stoics, " is social, therefore the social design must be " the great object in the constitution of men. — " It is proper to a man," say they, " to love " those that hate him, not to be angry with the " stupid or ungrateful, but to teach them bet- " ter, or to bear with them. — He that divideth " himself from his neighbour by hating him, " divideth himself from the whole body of man- " kind ; as a branch, divideth from its neigh- f( hour branch, is thereby separated from the " whole tree. — Injustice to man, " say they," is " impiety to God." — Sucli sentiments are scat- tered through the writings of the old philoso- phers. It is easy to collect them. — It is easy to VOL. I. M 162 make beautiful assemblages. — Bui who shall make the selection ? who shall separate the gold from the dross ? the flower from the noxious weed ? Though a Christian may, a heathen could not. — The very philosophers themselves, we know, did not; for we find them, not merely com- mitting the grosest crimes, and having pleasure in those who did the same, but even expressly permitting and authorising them in their writ- ings. — The sin of drunkenness, that mother of all other crimes, is allowed by Plato to those who have passed the age of forty, and that in a work where we should expect the greatest ex- ertion of philosophy, the greatest accuracy of morals. — For the same vice has Seneca pleaded. — In it did Zeno live. — In it did Chysippus die. They held that there was a right and prudent use of drunkenness. I shall not profane this place with the mention of some other crimes, which Plato has recommended in his republic, and which Zeno and Chysippus have coun- tenanced. I almost fear to allude to what So- crates, Plato, Xenophon, Cebes, and Cicero have approved of, and which ought not so much as to be named among us. But, were even the praise-worthy features of the ancient morality to be attributed to the sole force of unassisted reason ? We know there was a traditional morality, as well as a traditional 163 theology j and can we suppose, that Pythagoras and the other originators of Grecian science did not avail themselves of Eastern instruction in this, as well as in other branches. — Indeed we know from history that he did receive commu- nications on these subjects from the ^Egyptian priests j and we are told that the precepts of morality, which he transmitted to his successors, were not claimed by him as his own invention ; — but that he stated, " that he had received them from a Priestess of Delos, and that they t* were therefore to be considered as of divine " authority." That the inhabitants of the East were very early in the practice of making collections of moral precepts, is evident from the writings of Solomon, which were composed at a date long anterior to the oldest Grecian philosophy, which contain all that is practically valuable in any of the Grecian systems,— and which bear evident marks of being, not the result of the ingenuity of the writer, not the deductions of his reason, but rather a collection of the wisdom of former ages, and sanctioned, not by argument, but by the divine authority of the source, from whence that wisdom had originated. — The transition from Solomon to Moses, and from Moses to Noah, who was ordained of God a preacher of righteousness to a sinful world, is obvious ; so M ( 2 164 that if we admit, that Grecian ethics, as well as her other sciences, originated in the East, for which we have both internal evidence, and the testimony of history, we must admit, that what- ever pure, whatever intelligible, whatever va- luable they contain, is derived from a much higher source than the acuteness of unassisted reason. — To this morality, which the Greeks seem to have derived from the East, they super- added the method, of attempting to establish its maxims by argument, and thereby both weak- ened and debased it. — The Eastern system, if I may so call it, taught as one having autho- rity ; it proposed the alternative between obe- dience and crime. The Grecian offered that between compliance and absurdity. — " Be per- " suaded, or you will act unreasonably." A motive little calculated to combat with the vio- lence of passion, and vanquish the depravity of our nature. — The earlier sages of Greece, Py- thagoras himself, had preserved the Eastern method. The early legislators, who perhaps may be considered among the oldest teachers of morality, were sensible of its value, and we never find them attempting to add to the au- thority of their laws by the force of argument ; and yet Cicero declares, that he preferred the twelve tables to all the libraries of the philo- sophers. 165 In fact, the only truly efficient motives to human action or forbearance, are hope and fear ; and these the philosophy, of which we now speak, expressly and totally rejects. It teaches, that hope and fear are unworthy mo- tives of action, that the first requisite to a wise man is not to fear the Deity. — It ridicules the fear of death or torture or infamy. — Plato and Socrates affirm, that death is better than life, not to some only, but simply to all. — A future state of rewards and punishments this philo- sophy totally denies ; though it might well have availed itself of it, for " antient current and famous were the traditions concerning it." — In no country, in no religion of the old world, were they not prevalent. And yet they were left merely to the fancy of the poets, and treated by philosophers with ridicule as vulgar errors. — A notable instance of the advantage of unas- sisted reason in enforcing morality. Though possessed of a tradition concerning the only ge- nuine sanction of moral rules, that tradition they totally rejected. This method of grounding moral rules on ra- tiocination, as it weakened, so it also debased morality. — However just we may suppose the principle, it is the lot of few human minds to be secure from error in the deductions. — When man is left to legislate for himself from proposed 166 principles however just, he is most apt to be misled by selfishness and passion ; and the mis- fortune is, that such errors become duties. — Hence we find the masters of this philosophy not merely permitting crimes, as I have before remarked, but even recommending them. — We find them also deriving from their principles the most impious the most blasphemous arrogance against the Supreme Being. — The fault of their system seems to be, that where it is not false, it is too abstract, where it descends to particu- lars, it is frequently erroneous,_where it is right, it is often paradoxical, as well as abstract, — and a paradoxical morality is by no means fitted for common use ; for the world will never believe its teachers sincere. Does the system discoun- tenance resentment, it also declares, that a wise man never forgives ; it declares, that none but the vain and foolish ever commiserate ; that it is not the property of a man to be exorable or placable.— -Does it command us to be content with what God allots, it teaches also to be un- concerned at calamity whether public, or pri- vate, or our own ; to be careless about prevent- ing, or remedying the crimes of others ; to be above all sorrow for our own representing all these things as matters " indifferent," and as the " fatal" course, the will of nature j not seeing, that there may be such a conformity with the divine will of events, as may clash 167 with the divine will of duty.— At the same time, to those who found lite a burden, they recommended self murder. — I shall not delay you by recounting more of their inconsisten- cies, more instances of how erroneously they applied principles, which when rightly under- stood, are perhaps well founded; — but shall close my observations on the ancient Ethics, by re- marking, that it did not bring forth in its profes- sors the fruit of good living, — that the two most virtuous characters of Heathen antiquity, Aris- tides and Phocion — were not philosophers — and that when and where philosophy was most pre- valent, then and there was immorality most abundant. With respect to the modern systems, I shall say but little. Their framers had before them that law which is holy just and good, to guide them in their researches, and to guard them in their deductions.— However excellent we may admit all or any of them to be, still, they are not the result of unassisted reason. — Shaftes- bury and Hucheson adopted the fundamental principle of the Platonic Ethics, and deduced from thence the various Christian virtues, and many of the Christian duties. Cudworth, Clarke and Price, from that of the School of Aristotle, arrived at the same conclusions. Hume blended the intellectual and instinctive 168 systems, and though he denied and affected to despise Revelation, yet he accommodated his conclusions to its practical dictates. — Paley and others, who have combined the Stoic ground- work with what the Epicurean had originally been, — by approaching nearer to religion pro- duced a more perfect system. — They all how- ever differing in principles arrived at the same conclusions, because they had the same light to direct them.— In the few, the very few in- stances, in which their deductions have been questioned, they have confessedly departed from the guidance of Gospel morality. To their principles perhaps it may be objected, that they would sometimes appear to authorize unsound conclusions, though their authors have not so applied them, and perhaps it might justly be ques- tioned, how far a morality, which wants una- nimity among its professors, can be adapted to general use. — But, waving all such objections, — such systems are not the work of unassisted rea- son, and therefore can afford no argument for its self sufficiency to guide us to the rules of duty. — If you wish for a criterion in this re- spect, turn to the ancient systems which were grounded on the same foundations, — and behold whatever is good in them probably derived from a traditionary Revelation ; behold the wisdom of this world proving itself to be foolishness be- fore God, by reasoning wrong from just princi- 169 pies ; — behold the structure, which human rea- son has raised on a respectable foundation, ab- stract and useless, paradoxical and inconsist- ent, weak, fruitless, and contaminated, bearing the evident marks of the workmanship of that heart, which is deceitful above all things and desperately wicked. I know not a more profitable exercise for a young mind, than to compare the ancient with the Christian morality ; the one outwardly in- deed beautiful, the other converting the heart ; — the one vainly seeking to extirpate our natu- ral feelings, the other making them the minis- ters of the grace of God ; — the one resting on motives devoid of general influence, the other addressing itself to the most powerful senti- ments of our nature, teaching that the fear of the Lord is the begining of wisdom, strength- ened by hope, cherished by gratitude, perfected by love. The modern systems, as I have said, want unanimity as to principle. The existence of moral sense has been questioned by some, who hold that it cannot be distinguished from the prejudices of early education. The exclusion of it has been blamed by others, as removing the generally admitted idea of conscience. 170 Hume, who united the two principles of sense and intellect, is represented as faulty in his cri- terion of merit, which would give the same ap- probation to constitutional qualities, as to vo- luntary actions, provided they were of the same general utility. — The system of Paley, which declares, that happiness is the object of man, that the revealed will of God is the criterion of virtue, and that hope and fear are the motives to duty ; by approaching more nearly to exact coincidence with the Gospel system, is perhaps more perfect than any other. And yet even this has been blamed for its laxity of applica- tion in some instances.— Yes, my fellow Chris- tians, the Bible is the true criterion of Ethical system, coincidence, accurate coincidence with it, is the great characteristic of moral excel- lence. Beyond it there is no security from er- ror. Without it there is no salvation from sin. — As well might you hope to verify the first in- sinuation of the tempter, and render mankind like gods, by the knowledge of good and evil ; as well might you attempt to realise the kindred and arrogant boast of the Stoic, and transform our nature from human to divine, by the cultivation of an imaginary wisdom, — as ex- pect to render man virtuous or even innocent, to turn the human heart from the depravity of a corrupted nature, by any efforts of human rea- 171 son, any dictates, any theories, unenlightened by the Revelation of God, undirected by his Holy Spirit. LECTURE III. Genesis ii. — 17. But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not eat of it, for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. IF the contemplation of the material universe serve to excite and perpetuate in the human mind admiration and awe for its all-powerful Creator j if the philosopher, when he traces with the utmost stretch of intellect the effects of that single power which God impressed on matter to sustain and regulate his vast creation, feel that the heavens declare his glory, and the fir- mament sheweth his wisdom ; if while he muses on even the lowliest works of our Almighty 172 Father, and beholds diffused throughout the gay creation light and life and beauty and en- joyment, he finds his tongue inspired with praise, his heart with gratitude and love ; — how much more shall the view of God's moral creation, his moral government, his progressive providence, his making man a free, and therefore a moral agent, the independant originator of thought and action, and yet turning these thoughts, these actions, even the very excesses and crimes of mankind, to the purposes of a merciful and predetermined arrangement, his ruling the pride, of the mighty ones and the rage of the people, his interposing by miracle, where miracle alone could be efficient, his turning the hearts of the disobedient to the wisdom of the just, and crowning man, whom he had made but little lower than the Angels, with glory and immor- tality, how much more shall the consideration of these things, of these his glorious works, excite us to gratitude and praise for his creative bounty, his preserving mercy, his redeeming love? Had man been created as the fatalists would represent to us, bound to a predetermined chain of action thought and will, he might be a grand and wonderful fabric, but the grandeur would be that of mechanism : The beast of the field which instinct leads would be as wonderful, the 173 comet which rolls and shall roll its path pre- scribed by the Almighty fiat, much more so. — There would be no more room for divine justice, divine indignation against sin, divine mercy to those that love him and keep his command- ments, in the moral, than in the material world. — As reasonably would the tempest be punished for its devastation, or the genial shower reward- ed for its bounty, as man for his crimes or vir- tues. — That kind of wisdom, which we under- stand to be displayed by a progressive Provi- dence adapting itself to the varieties of contin- gent action, would no longer have scope for ex- ercise, and yet this, my fellow Christians, is a species of wisdom, which to minds untutored in the oppositions of science, seems more wonder- ful and more excellent than any other. It is a species of wisdom, which the Bible, from Ge- nesis to the Revelations, persists in attributing to the Deity. — I cannot bring myself to consider the various assertions of Scripture on this point as merely figurative language because that phi- losophers have proved that the Deity must fore- know from eternity every action of human in- tellect or will, and that therefore these actions cannot be contingent, it may be true, but I have not yet found Scripture authority for it ; fore- knowledge may be reconcileable with contin- gency though they cannot reconcile it. — I shall therefore in my present enquiry consider God 174 literally as the Bible represents him, possessed of affections similar to those of human nature, but without its weaknesses, capable of being touched with the feeling of our infirmities, in whose sight the righteous and faithful find fa- vour, from whom sinners meet with wrath and indignation, capable of being influenced by con- trition, by amendment, by supplication, to re- pent him of the evil he had purposed, ruling all things both in heaven and earth, occasionally interposing miracles in furtherance of his moral government, and sometimes declaring to man- kind beforehand what he is about to do. — Pro- claiming himself to the children of Israel, " the Lord, the Lord God, merciful, and gracious, long suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin, but that will by no means clear the guilty," — declaring by his prophet, that he should be called wonderful, counsellor, the almighty Father, the prince of peace, — publishing by his holy apostle, " that God is love," — describing himself thus by his moral attributes, but leaving his essential glories un- discovered 5 glories which Moses could not be- hold and live, which are hopelessly removed from human conception, until that blessed state when that which is perfect shall come, when we shall behold him face to face, and know even as we are known. 175 With such ideas of God, and man, derived I trust fiom the teaching of the Bible, do I enter on my present enquiry ; — satisfied with the de- scription which the Almighty has given of him- self, and seeking not to be wise above that which is written, we shall avoid the various con- troversies, and the multiplied difficulties, which have arisen from the metaphysical notions of the Deity. — Taking man as the Scriptures have de- scribed him, an accountable, and therefore a free agent, incapable of himself of thinking any good thought, or doing any good work, inca- pable of arriving by the force of unassisted rea- son, at the knowledge of God, or of his duty, and yet capable of working out his own salvation with fear and trembling, while God worketh in him both to will and to do ; — taking man, I say, as the Scriptures have described him, we shall the better and with more safety approach the history of God's moral government in propor- tioning his revealed dispensations to the circum- stances of mankind. — While we keep the Scrip- tures in view, our observations, though they may fall short of the truth, cannot go beyond it, though they may be imperfect, they cannot be erroneous, if they tend to increase our love and gratitude to God, the fruit which tltey cherish, the end which they promote will confer a value on the means. 176 The inspired historian of the beginnings of the heavens and the earth, describes God as having formed man originally in a state of in- nocency, ignorant of the distinction between good and evil. — He saw no evil, for behold every thing was very good ; the blessing of God had rested on the new creation ; he had committed no evil, and as experience is the appropriate inlet of human knowledge, must naturally have been ignorant of the distinction. How he ac- quired this fatal information, the history pro- ceeds to describe. It was by an act of disobe- dience. — The Lord God had said unto him, of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not eat, for, in the day that thou eatest thereof, dying thou shalt die. — Of that fruit did he eat. That punishment of protracted death, which human life has since exemplified, did he incur. — He then, by dreadful experience, ac- quired a knowledge which was torment, a mo- ral sense, which had before lain unexcited, arose in his heart.— Conscience presented to his view the good which he had forsaken, the evil which he had embraced. Thus did he acquire the knowledge of good and evil. In this relation, I can see no room for the re- marks, which some have stated as difficulties, others as objections. — I can see no reason, from the apparently figurative name of the tree, to 177 treat the whole as allegory. — [f the act of dis- obedience naturally produced the knowledge of good and evil, surely the object of that act might well be called the tree of that knowledge. Any other tree, as well as that which stood in the midst of the garden, had it been specified in the command, would have equally merited the name. Still less can I perceive any absurdity, any thing inconsistent with the dignity of God, in imposing on Adam only a single, and appa- rently trivial command. — On the contrary, with- out recurring to the extreme argument, that I know of no dignity, except the scriptural dignity, of God, and therefore cannot receive any imagi- nary dignity in contradiction to the relations of the Bible; — it appears to me that the simplicity of the injunction, was most expressive of the mercy and goodness of God, and most wisely propor- tioned to the then circumstances of man. — The other parts of the creation had been formed at once in their best possible state. They were to go no farther. Man alone was formed a being fitted for indefinite progress, unlimitted increase in wisdom, in virtue, and in happiness. — In this course he was to be led, not at once, but gradually, not by constraint, but with his own consent ; because the excellence of virtue can- not exist, except it be voluntary. — For that pro- VOL. I. N 17* gressive improvement, discipline was requisite. For the exercise of that discipline, law was ne- nessary. — And surely, the simpler the law, the easier the command, the greater was the mercy, surely, the more powerful the sanction, the greater the nisdom of its author.— God did not implant in the heart of Adam overpowering pas- sions, and command their restraint. Human nature was not yet debased by sin, the excess of passion did not yet exist, and where evil pas- sions did not exist, the gratification of evil pas- sions could not be forbidden. Where no evil was, there the object of any command must have been something innocent in itself. Had the command been to refrain from injuring his wife, from destroying the animals which were his com- panions, or even the trees whose beauty and whose produce formed his enjoyment and sub- sistence, exclusive of his having no temptation to violate the command, he would have had the strongest reasons, even from selfish consider- ations, to have obeyed it ; so that the principle of his obedience would not have been of that unmixed, that single nature, which is charac- terized as " the fear of the Lord the beginning " of all wisdom." — There is also another and kindred source of holiness, which the command given to Adam was calculated to exercise, and by exercising to strengthen.— -I mean faith in God — which has, and is, and ever shall be, the 179 great means of sanctification in man. — God de- clared to him that if he transgressed, that dying he should die — The tempter was permitted to insinuate, that he should not. — Think you, my fellow Christians, that the exertion of faith here required was inconsiderable ?— -Adam had never beheld death, he could conceive it only from the similitude of sleep, or as a negation of which he could form no idea. If his posterity who live in the valley of darkness and the sha- dow of death, in the midst of mortality, where thousands fall beside them, and ten thousands at their right hand, forget in the hurry of oc- cupation, in the transient gleam of enjoyment, in the momentary glow of fancy, and the pride of life, forget the certain the gloomy march of dissolution ; if they find it so hard to persuade themselves, that the hour is fast approaching, perhaps even now is, when they must become tenants of the grave, and inferior to the worm that shall be their companion; — how much more readily must Adam have listened to the voice of the tempter, " thou shalt not surely die."— Behold then in the command the most appro- priate scope and exercise for those two graces, which are the ground-work of all godliness, — the only possible trial for that obedience, of which the Almighty declares, that " to obey is *« better than to sacrifice, and to hearken than ff the blood of rams," perhaps the beat chosen n 2 180 test, which his situation would admit, of that faith, which is the grand instrument of our sal- vation from sin, that faith, by which Abel's sa- crifice was rendered acceptable, by which Enoch pleased God, by which Noah found grace in his sight, by which Abraham became the heir of righteousness, by which Christ is made unto us sanctification, and redemption, namely, that faith which is unto obedience. Had he with- stood the temptation, his habits of obedience were begun, his faith was strengthened by ex- ertion,— he was ready for farther trial to con- firm his obedience, to increase his faith, to lead him in gradual progress from strength to strength, till he should arrive at the fullness of the sta- ture of the sons of God. — For this progress a strengthened faith was absolutely requisite.— If human reason be insufficient of itself to lead us to the information of virtue, and the knowledge of God's moral attributes, — that information, that knowledge, could Adam have derived only from the teaching of God himself, and for that teaching he would have been totally unfit with- out a lively faith, — so that, without faith, it was as impossible for Adam to make advances in a holy and virtuous life, as it is for us, my fellow Christians, under the present dispensation. But this bright course, the cultivation of these spi- ritual graces was prevented in its very beginning. Eve had not heard the commandment immedi- 181 ately from God ; it had been uttered before she was formed ; she knew it only from the declara- tion of her husband ; she therefore more readily listened to the voice of the tempter inciting her to disbelieve its sanction. — She did not attempt to persuade her husband, until her own escaping without immediate death had strengthened her unbelief. That escape Adam beheld. — He saw that she had eaten, and yet lived. — The first moment shook his belief in God's denunciation ; the next overthrew it.— She gave unto Adam, and he also did eat.. — Is not this natural, my fellow Christians ? How many of his posterity are there who, because vengeance is not instanta- neous, persuade themselves that the sinner shall not surely die. — I have dwelt on the description, because it has been represented to be impro- bable. — It has been objected, that we cannot conceive that Adam, created in the full per- fection of intellect, would incur such a penalty as death, for such a trivial object. — I think I have shewn you, that it was not the penalty which he weighed against the object, but a shaken, a weakened, an overthrown faith, (a process which not only would probably, but al- most constantly does, triumph over human na- ture;) — and that the temptation to which he was exposed was not only best proportioned to his situation, but also best calculated to make trial of his faith and obedience, and to have 182 strengthened that faith and obedience, had he resisted. I shall conclude by entreating you, ever to bear in mind, that the cause of Adam's fall was the deficiency of his faith. Not that he dis- believed the being of God, for that was impos- sible. Not that he formed erroneous specula- tions respecting his nature, for he had no need of theorising, he enjoyed the presence of his God, and beheld his glory.— -It was the bounty, the sufficiency, the truth of God, which he dis- believed.— He imagined that God was with- holding some good thing from him ; he sought, by his own strength, to add a wisdom to his other perfections, which should exalt his nature from human to divine. — He listened to the in- sinuation of the tempter, rather than to the voice of God, and flattered himself that though disobedient, he should not perish. — How justly then is faith made the grand feature of the Christian dispensation ! How justly are we called on to believe that God will withhold no good thing from those who love him, to confess that our sufficiency is of God! — to be persuaded that without obedience no man shall taste of the tree of life, without holiness no man shall see the Lord.— Let us therefore, my fellow Christians, ever mindful of what first produced the degradation of our nature, and ofthe means 183 of retrieval prescribed by a Redeemer's love, cast all our care on him who hath so eared for us.— Let us be satisfied with the wisdom which the Scriptures contain, being assured that they contain all that is necessary for making us wise unto salvation, — being convinced that faith unto obedience is that from which Adam fell, and to which we are called. LECTURE IV. Romans, v. — 14. Nevertheless, death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over those that had not sinned in the similitude of Adam's tra?isgression. IN my last address to you, my fellow Chris- tians, I considered the first state in which man was placed by his Creator, and endeavoured to trace the relation between that state and the 184 means of religious improvement afforded to him by the Almighty. — We found him described as possessing a nature as yet undepraved, free from the sinful excess of passion, sharing in common with the whole creation the eulogium of its God, that behold every thing was very good. — We found him placed in the simplest of all societies, that of a person who was litterally his second self, bone of his bone, and flesh of his flesh, exempt from all temptation to the pro- duction of physical evil, exempt from the ex- perimental knowledge of that which was moral. We found him enjoying the presence of his Creator, and knowing from God himself, that the heavens and the earth were the work of his hands, and that beside him, there was no other ; — incapable of crime towards man, in- capable of adoring any other God j — with be- nevolence impressed on his heart in its first — its strongest — its dearest form, with the faith and love of him who beholds his benefactor, his fa- ther, his Creator ; — nought was wanting to the perfection of his nature, but the perfection of those heavenly sentiments by gradual cultiva- tion. — For the commencement of this process a single command was given him, — the matter of which had nothing to recommend it, but the authority of God, and was therefore the better calculated to exercise his faith, his reverence, his obedience. — The temptation, to which it was 185 the means of exposing him, was addressed to the noblest desires of human nature, and there- fore at once the more powerful and the more appropriate to an undepraved heart. — It was strengthened by the suggestion of the most sub- tle of all other created beings, that God's jus- tice was uncertain, and his mercy incomplete. Could there be a better exercise for man's be- lief in that justice, and confidence in that mer- cy ? A better aid in his progress to that per- fect love, which casteth out suspicion ? From this bright course, these happy pros- pects, Adam by disobedience fell ; and involved himself and his posterity in sin and misery, just- ly liable to the punishment denounced against his transgression, and during the suspension of the sentence, the short — the transient respite of human life, exposed to the desperate wicked- ness of a heart depraved by sin, to the violence of evil passions, which disobedience had engen- dered, and which causes to us unknown, though the melancholy fact be unquestionable, continue to perpetuate, and would, perhaps, if left to the ordinary course of nature, augment, until they produced the total extinction of our species. — Left to that wisdom, which he had preferred to obedience, to that knowledge of good and evil, which he had purchased at the expense of his faith, Adam and his posterity 186 became the children of wrath, and over those even, who, from the time of Adam to that of Moses, did not sin after the likness of his trans- gression, nevertheless did death reign. — The religious dispensation of God to mankind dur- ing this state must become our next object of enquiry. We must seek in the sacred records what information, what means of improvement he afforded them, and endeavour, with humble reverence, to point out the proportion, which, whether our weak faculties can discover it or not, we know must have existed, between the means applied by Almighty wisdom, and the state of that being, that was the object of un- limited mercy. — And here it may be requisite to make a few remarks on the Scripture account of original sin j — as there are perhaps few points in religious speculation, concerning which there has been a greater variety of opinion, or which have more frequently been made occasion of objection by infidels. Not content with the simple fact, which the Scripture asserts, that by one man's disobedience many were made sinners ; from the earliest ages of the Church, to the time of the Reformation, those who were zealous to understand all mysteries, and to be leaders of the blind, have been devising vari- ous conjectural systems to explain how these things can be. Not content with the plain transfusion of Scripture, which the article of 187 our Churcli possesses ; from the sera of the Re- formation to the present day, those, who would seem to possess all knowledge, have contrived inventions if possible more diversified. On these systems, on consequences drawn from these inventions, have unbelievers fastened, and raised objections, which, as one of the most orthodox writers of our Church has remarked, are more readily offered than answered.— These various systems, and the objections which they have given occasion to, owe their origin to one common principle, namely, the opinion, that conceivableness is the criterion of truth and the measure of assent. The one party could not at once conceive how, by the offence of one, judgment come upon all men to condemnation, and therefore had recourse to conjectural the- ory to aid them in this conception ; the other party could not conceive, how the consequences of these theories could consist with reason or even with each other, and while they success- fully combated them, imagined they were tri- umphing over religion. — Let us try the merits of their common principle, conceivableness. The opinion of its being the legitimate measure of truth is both prevalent and plausible, it is therefore worthy of examination. With respect to those things, to which our faculties are proportioned and our reason com- 188 mensurate, conceivableness ought to be, and actually is, one of the principal guides of our assent j in such matters what we cannot con- ceive, we ought not, we do not, nay we cannot believe.— But here we must carefully recollect the distinction, which has been established in a valuable work which has been, or shortly will become, the study of my hearers, between those things to which our faculties are commen- surate, and those to which they are not ; be- tween what is according or contrary to reason, and what is above it. And most assuredly of the latter description are the relations between a Creator and his creature, between the father of a race and the souls which are created to ani- mate his progeny, and the connection between the actions of one man and the state of ano- ther. — These are matters, in which the nature of the relation between the terms is unknown to us. They are isolated facts, for which we can find no others with which we may classify them, which we therefore cannot conceive, be- cause our only mode of conceiving any thing is either by knowing the actual nature of it, or by conjecturing it to be similar to something which we do know. — And yet these three things must we be able to comprehend, before we can con- ceive the effect of original sin, the imputation of Adam's transgression. — On matters of this nature we are called for our belief, and for the 189 affections of our hearts consequent on such be- lief—if they be declared in Scripture. — If God has told us that in Adam we have died, and that in Christ we are made alive, we are called on to faith, to gratitude, and to love ; — but by- no means, to be able to explain how these things can be, to understand what is obviously above the reach of our understandings. Had the framers of the theories above mentioned attended to this distinction, they would have seen how totally superfluous all theory was on such a subject. — Had the objectors attended to it, they would have seen how impossible it was to draw consequences, where the principles were beyond the reach of our intellectual vi- sion, how absurd it was to charge the defects of human inventions on the pure the perfect word of God. We should not then have heard of an imaginary contract between God, and Adam as the representative of the whole future hu- man race, as if their souls were virtually con- tained in him, because their bodies may in some sense be said to have been so, nor if the vari- ous other conjectural aids for conceiving the in- fluence and effects of original sin, which are neither contained in, nor countenanced by, Scripture. We should not have heard of ob- jections to these systems being considered as objections against religion. The belief in them would not have been identified with the bedief 190 of Scripture. Both parties would have felt and admitted, that, though inconceivableness is no argument against any thing contained in Divine Revelation, it is a most fatal one against any thing which is not. — The sincere defenders of religion could at once have replied to object- ors ; if your objections be against any thing as- serted in Scripture, we are ready to answer them ; if they be against any human theory of however high authority, we are not concerned with them ; if they be against consequences de- rived by either you or others from assertions in Scripture, which concern matters obviously above human comprehension, we deny the power of man to go a single step beyond what is revealed, to add ought thereto, to draw a single consequence from propositions concern- ing matters confessedly above the measure of his faculties. Taking the tenet of original sin in this point of view, our knowledge con- cerning it is reduced to the compass of a few plain texts of Scripture. All theories become superfluous, all objections become irrelevant, except, that objectors shew, that the authority of Scripture can be questioned, or that its asser- tions on this momentous point are not calcu- lated to address themselves to the affections of the human heart, that great object of all reli- gion, to work by love, and to regulate the whole conversation of our lives. 191 We are told in Scripture, that at the creation every thing was very good. We are afterwards told, that the human heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked ; that is, our nature has been depraved. We are told, that by one man's disobedience many were made sinners ; that is, that mankind are accounted guilty before God. We are told that death, that death which is the wages of sin, reigned over those even who had not sinned in the likeness of Adam's transgression; that is, that this guiltiness this original sin consists in some- thing more than merely the following of Adam's example. We are told, that from this curse, from this bondage of sin, are we freed by the sacrifice of Christ, who is made both redemption and sanctification to them that believe. Shall we discredit all this, and strive to explain away its obvious meaning, because we cannot con- ceive how it can be. Adam perhaps could not conceive how the fruit of a tree, which seemed pleasant to the sight, and good for food, could produce inevitable destruction. — 'And yet that destruction was certain. — Cain perhaps could not conceive why the fruits of the earth should not be as worthy an offering as the first- ling of the flock. And yet by faith did Abel offer a more acceptable sacrifice. — Noah per- haps could not conceive how the order of na- ture could be changed for the chastisement of 192 an impenitent world. And yet his faith in the declarations of God became at once the occa- sion of his rinding favour, and the instrument of his preservation. Abraham, when he pre- pared to sacrifice the son of his old age, could not conceive how the promises of God could then be fulfilled. And yet he repressed those suspicions, and his faith was accounted to him for righteousness. His posterity could not con- ceive how the meek, the lowly Jesus could be the Son of Jehovah. And yet, beyond all con- troversy, was that Jesus— God manifested in the flesh. — The theorising Christian and the free thinking philosopher cannot conceive how the sin of Adam could deprave the nature of his posterity, and render them the objects deserv- ing of the wrath of God. And yet the asser- tions of Scripture on these points are too plain, too much interwoven with the whole body of Revelation to be explained away. In such a state must we therefore consider man from the time of Adam to that of Moses. Actuated by a depraved elation of his natural affections, a morbid energy of his faculties, he filled the earth with violence. Possessed by a moral insanity, which was perpetuated by de- scent and augmented by exertion, he became a vessel fitted for destruction. — In such a thral- dom of sin, living thus in the midst of death, 193 what was the first exertion of Divine goodness which man experienced ? — The earliest step to- wards the reformation of a criminal is to hold out to him the hope of mercy. And that hope was held out to man in the promise of a Re- deemer. — The declaration, " That the seed of the woman should bruise the serpent's head," appears to have been expressed to our first pa- rents in such a manner as to convey to their minds its mystical meaning, for both they and many of their immediate descendants appear to have laid hold on the hope which was set before them. Eve, at the birth of her first born, seems to have flattered herself, that she had gotten the promised man from the Lord. Abel offered that species of sacrifice, which was pro- bably then, as well as afterwards, commanded as a type of Christ's atonement, for we are told he did so through faith. — Enoch by faith walk- ed with God, that is, his faith was a faith unto obedience, and in consequence thereof, he was taken by God and exempted from the curse of mortality.— If the promise of a Redeemer had not been understood by him, and if, except through Christ, no one can come to God, in what could that faith have been which produced so glorious a reward ? — Behold then the second dispensation of religious discipline consisted in the promise of a Redeemer. — This promise ap- pears, from the single account we have of it, to vol. r. o 194 have been as to its form ambiguous and there- fore obscure, and yet sufficiently clear to excite a lively faith in such as chose to receive it. — As to the manner of its communication, its au- thority was unquestionable. It was God him- self in person who announced it. So that we may here perceive two peculiarities of the dis- pensation in question, namely, that the form of the promise was obscure, and the manner, the authority of its communication unquestionable. — To these we may perhaps add a third, that there does not appear to have been a positive law of any considerable extent given to man- kind before the time of Moses. — God supplied the place of law by his actual presence, his ac- tual intercourse with mankind ; at first with all, afterwards when many had added to the sin of Adam their own multiplied transgressions, had like Cain, despaired of the promised mercy, and like him gone forth from the presence of the Lord ; the Deity appears to have restricted his presence to those who are termed the sons of God, who are said to have called themselves after the name of Jehovah, who like Enoch pleased God by faith, and like Noah found fa- vour in his sight. — The rest were left with no other direction than the example of those vir- tuous few, the influence of the rewards which they received, and the dictates of their own 195 hearts, whereby the Gentiles, not having a la\v» are a law unto themselves. Let us compare those three peculiarities with the state of mankind during the existence of the dispensation, and I think it will not require very deep research, to observe the traces of di- vine beneficence and wisdom. It is well remarked by the Apostle, that, be- fore we can come to God, we must believe that he is. — Before we can have that love which is the fulfilling of the law, we must have that faith which is unto us obedience. And before we can have that faith in the promises and threat- enings of God, that confidence in his mercy, which produces obedience, we must believe that he exists, and has really made those promises, issued those denunciations, and offered that mercy.— So that this passive assurance of the existence of God, this historical assent to the facts of his having made certain promises of mercy and promulgated certain rules of life, though it be distinguishable from that active, that religious faith, whose fruits are righteous- ness, and whose end is everlasting life, is yet its prerequisite groundwork and foundation. Now, in the infancy of our species, how could this conviction of the being of God be produced, ex- cept by his actual presence ? Had Adam never o 2 196 heard the voice of his Creator blessing him, and gifting him. with dominion over the new cre- ation, had the history of the stupendous six days work never been related to him by the Almighty framer, he would have known as little of his God, as the solitary infant whom the chance of shipwreck has cast on some deserted shore.— Of the universe he would only know, that it probably extended beyond the bounds of his observation. Of its duration, he might per- haps conjecture, that it was antecedent to his recollection. — If his posterity, though aided by the suggestions of traditionary revelation, waited for some thousand years, before they devised a proof of the being of a God, if to this present day, multitudes of the human race dwelling amidst the works of God, blind to the holy idea, which the glorious view suggests, bow down to the absurdity of some ridiculous idol, how long might the infancy of human reason, how long might Adam and his immediate offspring have remained ignorant of their God, ignorant of this sacred spring of every thing valuable in life, had he not been actually present to their senses. —But perhaps it may be supposed, that his ac- tual presence to Adam would have been suffi- cient, and that Adam might have communi- cated to his posterity the knowledge of God's existence and his will. — Of his will, and the his- tory of the creation, no doubt he might, and 197 probably did. But, before even these could be fully credited, his existence must be established by something more than bare assertion. — By something more than bare assertion, I say, be- cause it was a fact totally unlike any other ob- ject of knowledge, incapable of being classified with any tiling else. How then should his as- sertion have been confirmed? Should he have addressed to them the demonstration which his descendants have since invented ? — This de- monstration has never been appealed to either by Moses, or the Prophets, or by our Saviour, or by his Apostles. When they wish to confirm the authority of their revelations, they appeal to miracles, the only legitimate, the only ap- propriate evidence of the existence and trans- mission of Divine authority.— Should Adam then have confirmed his assertion by miracle ?— In the first age of the world miracle was impos- sible. — Where every thing is new, every thing is equally wonderful, but nothing can be mira- culous. Had Adam, in proof of his veracity, recalled the murdered Abel from the sleep of death, — the miraculous nature of the act would not have been perceived. Had the waters of the sea risen on an heap, or the sun stood still at his controlling word, — these facts would have appeared no more miraculous to the infant world, than the darkness of an eclipse, or the swell of some unusual tide. — Had he anticipated every 198 miracle recorded in Scripture, the finger of God would not have been distinguished from the ef- fect of natural causes. The existence of mira- cle presupposes an established, a matured expe- rience. If miracle be an incident contrary to our established experience of the order of na- ture, in the childhood of that experience there can be no miracle. There could have been no means of confirming the testimony of Adam, which being single, would have been in- sufficient to have produced an operative con- viction.— Such a conviction could be produced (humanly speaking), only by the Deity's being actually present to the senses of mankind. With respect to the other peculiarities of this second dispensation, namely, the obscurity of the promise, and the simplicity of the law, we may perceive how they were proportioned to the state of mankind, by considering their con- nection with the actual presence of the Deity. — In no age of religion have the grounds of re- ligious faith been so constituted as to be over- powering. — That faith which hp the gift of jus- tifying must be voluntary. — By* a voluntary dis- belief in God did man become disobedient.— By a voluntary faith in his promises, by a vo- luntary laying hold of the hope of a Redeemer, must man be regenerated and sanctified. — Now when the promise came immediately from God 199 himself, had it been explicit, fully descriptive, and circumstantial, it would have been over- powering. No one could have neglected it. It would have afforded an evidence of things not seen stronger than Divine wisdom has ever vouchsafed to mankind, totally disproportioned to a state of voluntary assent and progressive trial. With respect to the limited extent of moral precepts under this second dispensation, its pro- portion to the state of mankind may also be derived from the consideration of the actual presence of God. — While God was actually pre- sent to one family of mankind, an extensive code of precepts to them would have been su- perfluous ; to the rest of mankind, who had gone forth from the presence of the Lord, it would have been useless. — To those who live without God in the world, who go forth from his pre- sence, and will not have him to reign over them, in vain are the injunctions of morality held forth. The swine will trample on the pearls which are cast before them, and the deafned reptile will close his ears to the incantations of wisdom. To those on whom the example of Enoch and the preaching of Noah failed of effect, in vain would that law which is holy just and good, have been addressed. — Now to God, &c. LECTURE V. Exodus xix. — 5 and 6. Now, therefore, if you will obey my voice, indeed, and keep my covenant, then shall ye be a pecu- liar treasure unto me above all people. For all the earth is mine, and ye shall be unto me a kingdom of Priests, and an holy nation. WHEN I addressed you on a former occasion, my fellow Christians, I endeavoured to point out to you the nature of the patriarchal dispen- sation, and its proportion to the infancy of hu- man society. — I endeavoured to shew you, that it consisted in the establishment of a succession of individuals, an holy generation, emphatically stiled the sons of God, and preserved, by his immediate intercourse, from the errors and the 201 corruptions of the surrounding world; that they might be, to that world, a light of spiritual wis- dom, an example of righteousness, receivers of the promises, preservers of the oracles, and pro- phets of the will of the Almighty. — I endea- voured also to shew you, that to them, and to the entire world by their intervention, was de- livered a promise of redemption, obscure as to its form, but unquestionable as to the manner of its communication ; and a positive law of comparatively small extent. And I attempted to satisfy you, that, in the infancy of human experience, this communication by the Deity in person was best calculated for the conviction of reason ; this obscurity of expression best adapted to the cultivation of faith ; and, that the sim- plicity of positive law was at once best suited to the then state of mankind, and the natural re- sult of the other features of the dispensation. The Mosaic dispensation, which we have next to consider, appears to have been an en- largement of the Patriarchal, having in view the same objects, availing itself of similar means, and differing from the former, only in those re- spects, in which the altered circumstances of human society required a variation. — ■ While the descendants of Adam were but few, their lan- guage the same, and their journeyings, first from the neighbourhood of Eden*, and afterwards 202 from that of Ararat, of comparatively small ex- tent ; a single family of Priests, a single suc- cession of Patriarchs, was sufficient for preserv- ing the knowledge of God and the memory of his promises, for being the intermediate instru- ments of communication between God and the world, for affording to mankind, in the length- ened space to which human life and vigour were then protracted, those promises of redemption, which were to be the objects of their faith, those lessons of righteousness, which were to be the rules of their obedience, those examples of ho- liness, which were to be the paterns of their imitation. But, when the human race had mul- tiplied itself on the face of the earth, a corres- ponding enlargement of the religiuus dispensa- tion became requisite. When the sons of men had been driven asunder, by the confusion of languages which their impiety had provoked, — and the parts into which they had been thus separated, still farther subdivided themselves, and, in search of subsistence for their encreas- ing cattle, had passed the river, or the moun- tain, which till then had limited their wander- ings, — the extent of Asia was gradually reple- nished with human inhabitants, and mankind, which before had been an assemblage of fami- lies, became a system of nations, and of tribes. —The variety of soils, over which they had spread themselves, led to an interchange of 203 their different products ; and this infant com. merce gaining strength and experience, daring the extensive river, the inland sea, and even the mighty ocean itself, diffused the super- abundant population, as far as navigation could reach. — Hence we find the various nations, which at present cover the globe, referable to Asiatic origin, their various languages evidently formed by gradual corruption from Asiatic sources, their arts and sciences confessedly of Asiatic extraction. And in Asia itself, we may remark, that its old nations seem to have been divided by the natural divisions of the country, ■ — indicating a gradual spreading of a race des- titute at first of the means of crossing those na- tural barriers, indicating, I say, their gradual spreading, from some central spot: while among the languages of Asia, we find three, or perhaps more, which, while they seem to have been the roots of all the rest, are so totally different from each other, that we can by no means suppose them to have had a common origin ; nor could we account for their difference, but for the scriptural history of the confusion at Babel. But mankind thus dispersed, thus scattered over the face of the earth, did not cease to be the objects of Almighty mercy. — That consum- ing fire, which attended by Cherubim, had kept the way to the tree of life, vouchsafed to rest 204 between the figures of those same mysterious be- ings, and to dwell among the sons of men. — A single family was no longer sufficient for be- ing the means of moral promulgation, the mes- sengers of spiritual knowledge.— -The influence of their example could not have reached be- yond the tribe to which they belonged, nor their preaching extended beyond the language which they spoke.— The contracted duration of human life at once weakened the authority, and en- dangered the purity, of traditionary instruc- tion. It was requisite, that there should be a written law, an established record of the his- tory of God's dealings with mankind, a public memorial of his promises. — It was requisite, that these should be promulgated and entrusted, no longer to the limited succession of a single fa- mily, whose transactions could excite only little observation ; but to the permanence and pub- licity of a civil establishment, to a Nation, whose history should attract an universal interest, and form a grand object in the records of the hu- man race. The descendants of Abraham, who, by his faith in the promises of God, had found favour in his sight, were gratuitously chosen to be the instruments of this dispensation. The entire of their moral law is a promulgation to mankind in general, of that perfect doctrine, which converts the soul, those sure testimonies, which give wisdom unto the simple.— The whole 205 of their institutions were a memorial of the promises of redemption, the shadow of good things to come. The series of their political history was calculated to attract general obser- vation, and to afford to that observation so at- tracted, full evidence of God's interference, and consequently of the Divine authority of their institutions. They were to be a kingdom of Priests and an holy nation, not only for their own advantage, but because, as my text de- clares, the whole earth is the Lord's ; not for their own private agrandisement or even exclu- sive instruction, but that the whole world might know, from the rising of the sun, to the going down thereof, that " Jehovah was God, and that beside him there was no other." — If they obeyed his voice, they were to have been to him a peculiar treasure, an example to the sur- rounding world, of his tender mercies to those, who love him and keep his commandments. — If they disobeyed, they were to be to the same ■world, an example of his vengeance against un- righteousness.— But in either case, they were to be the instruments of religious dispensation to the rest of mankind. — Whether they should be voluntary or involuntary instruments, whe- ther they should be rewarded or punished, de- pended on themselves. — But, on the immuta- ble councils of the Almighty, did it depend, that in the law and the promises, which were 206 theirs, and in Christ, who, according to the flesh, was to arise among them, were all the fa- milies of the earth to be blessed.— Hence, we may observe, how totally irrelevant is the objec- tion of some infidels, who affect to consider it incredible, that such a perverse and disobedi- ent nation, as the Jews, could have been God's chosen people. They were chosen, not to ex- clusive salvation, but to be the means of offer- ing salvation to others. — They were chosen for this purpose, not for their merits, but gratuit- ously ; their obedience and their disobedience being made equally to contribute towards the one grand object, and the outline of their his- tory being so conducted, as most eminently to qualify them for the office to which they were elected. As the history of the Patriarchal family con- cludes with the settlement of Joseph and his brethren in Egypt j so the history of their de- scendants as a nation begins in the same coun- try. That Egypt was the earliest kingdom, which was erected after the confusion of Babel, may be collected, not only from sacred, but also from profane history ; while its stupenduous architectural monuments afford an additional testimony to its antiquity. Indeed, the fabu- 207 Ious nature of its early annals would lead us to the same conclusion, because, such can only ex- ist, among a people whose history is more anci- ent than the use of letters, — and where the minds of its early annalists have neither been aided nor controlled by the influence of the Holy Spirit. Egypt, as she was thus the first in establishing a political society, appears also to have been the foremost in commerce, and the originator of science. Her situation led to the one, and that gave birth to the other. So that she appears to have been as if the metropolis of the rising world, and the centre of its civiliza- tion.— But, while she diffused her arts, and af- forded, to the rest of the world, an example of civil government, she also diffused an idolatrous departure from the simplicity of early tradi- tion. — This had probably originated from her hieroglyphical mode of recording past transac- tions ; an aid apparently the greatest which early ingenuity could contribute towards the improve- ment of society, and yet eventually productive of its greatest evil : — as if to evince the insuf- ficiency of unaided mankind ; to shew, that hu- man genius, while she stretches after science, may sink into ruin ; — while she desires that, which seems good to make one wise, may incur the sentence of inevitable destruction. On such a theatre, did the history of God's 208 chosen people begin. In the very cradle of ido- latry, did Jehovah triumph over idols ; — and, while he permitted the exercise of magical power, convert the hearts of its instruments by the manifestation of his superiority. — In the very spring of human science, did he infuse that balm, by which its waters become the health of society. — In the very centre of human intercourse, did he write the record of his ven- geance against hardened and impenitent sinners, of his mercv towards the afflicted, — of his power and Godhead, that they might be known as far as that intercourse extended. For this purpose, was Pharoah rescued for a time, from that destruction, which his former oppression had merited. For this purpose, was he raised up, as the respited criminal is raised up out of prison. — For this purpose, did the dealings of God, at this crisis, by their mira- culous nature, address themselves most power- fully to the attention and memory of mankind ; — while the air, the river, and the reptiles, which were the objects of Egypt's idolatry, were made the instruments of her chastisement. -—For this purpose, was there a distinction made between those of the Egyptians, who feared Jehovah and believed the word of Moses, and those, whose hearts were hardened like that of Pharoah, or perhaps, like too many, who fear- 209 ed man more than God ;— -the latter perishing with their master in the Red Sea ; the former having their lives, and even their cattle, spared to them.— A circumstance, to which, though history does not authorise us, we may perhaps refer the purity of the religion, which for a long time afterwards, prevailed in one part of Egypt, while the inhabitants of the other were sunk in the most debased superstition. If we follow the history of the chosen peo- ple, in their wanderings in the wilderness, and their subsequent conquest of Canaan, we shall find that it was most admirably adapted to the promulgation of that law and those promises, which had been committed to their charge. And here an objection, which has been advanced by infidels against the credibility of this part of the Mosaic history, naturally presents itself. — Could not the transfer of the chosen people from Egypt to Syria have been effected by or- dinary means ? And if so, where exists that sufficient cause for those continual interruptions of the established rules of natural action, which this history records, that sufficient cause, which we must always establish, or at least suppose, before we admit the reality of any miracle ? Had the object of Providence been merely the esta- blishment of Abraham's descendants in the pro- mised land, the objection perhaps might be vol. i. p 210 plausible. — But when we consider, that the object was the authoritative promulgation of the law and promises of God to mankind in general, we see the absolute necessity there was for a departure from the ordinary course of nature. — Such communication could not have been made, except in a superna- tural manner, could not have been autho- rised, except by some evident and notorious miracle. — And the more frequent, the more no- torious the miracles which accompanied it, the more diffused and the more impressive would that promulgation be. No doubt the children of Israel might have acquired the promised land, by one of those ordinary revolutions, which transfer the sovereignty of a country from one people to another.— But would the surrounding world then have been assured, that the rules of life, which through them were declared to man- kind, and the promises, which through them were held out as objects of faith, had originat- ed from that being, who could command that world which he had created, and control those laws of nature, which he had established ? —And accordingly, we find this part of the Mosaic history a series of natural and also of moral miracles.— That a people, debased by servitude, and weakened by oppression, should escape from the midst of their masters, and those masters the then most powerful nation in 211 the world, is a moral miracle. That they should pass the Red Sea dry shod, is a natural one. That six hundred thousand men should remain for forty years in the wilderness, is a moral miracle. That they should be guided by a cloud and pillar of fire, is a natural one. That such a nation, after such a wandering, should subdue the powerful tribes and warlike kings of Palestine, is a moral miracle. That the lights of Heaven should stand still over the valley of Ai to give time for their victory, is a natural one ; one, in which there could be no decep- tion, nor no defect of universal observation. — In short, every thing belonging to this period of their history was miraculous. Their raiment was miraculous, for it waxed not old. Their meat was miraculous, for it fell from Heaven. Their drink was miraculous, for it proceeded from a rock, which, as we may collect from the Apostle, was not confined to one situation, but followed them in their wanderings. Every thing, I say, connected with this period of their history was miraculous, because, it was the pe- riod of promulgation from God to man. Every a?ra of promulgation, except the first, (and to that, I have shewn, miracle would have been disproportioned,) every aera of promulga- tion must be, and has been, that of miracle. Because, miracle is the appropriate evidence of 212 Divine authority. — The promulgation by Noah attended the stupendous miracle of the flood. — The promulgation by Christ was confirmed by miraculous exertions of benevolence and mercy, performed, not in a corner, but in presence of an assembled people. — Did the Deity declare himself to the children of Israel ? — It was in fire from Sinai's top, while the lightnings of heaven issued from the sides, and its thunders pro- ceeded from the recesses of the mountain. — Did he, by the intervention of his chosen peo- ple, declare himself to mankind in general ? It was by the sea through which he led them, the iiery pillar which guided them, the sun which stood still over their battle.— Not only this com- mencement, but the entire series of their his- tory, seems most surprisingly calculated, for their being the means of general promulgation of the will and promises of God to mankind. — We find them at the conclusion of their forty years wandering, driving out from before them the inhabitants of Canaan, who, from their con- nection with the Phenicians, who were then a commercial and a roving people, were qualified to spread the history of every thing connected with their miraculous expulsion, to the remotest habitation of mankind. — And there is reason to to believe, that they were actually widely scat- tered over the world. 21.3 We find the chosen people afterwards, though of inconsiderable political importance, yet impli- cated in the transactions of the most powerful empires ; their misfortunes and their successes alternately contributing to the diffusion of the precepts and promises of the Almighty. Were they led into captivity by the Assyrians, we find the knowledge of their institutions thereby spread over the extensive empire, — the know- lenge of Jehovah impressed on its sovereigns, and his worship enjoined, by public edict, to its numerous subjects. Were they restored by the victorious Cyrus, the accomplishment of a prophecy, which had long been known as far as the Jewish captives had been scattered, served to establish the credit of the accompanying predictions, to make known the ways of God to men, and his saving health to all nations. Were they, according to the denunciation of the Prophet, again subjected to ^Egyptian do- minion, we find that subjection the occasion of their history their laws and their prophecies be- ing translated into the most general language of human intercourse, diffused as exclusively as Grecian literature could reach, and secured, by the multiplicity of copies, from corruption, or even the suspicion of forgery. In later times, we find the Jews, by becoming the ob- jects of Roman ambition, rendered the in- struments of diffusing the knowledge of Di- 214 of Divine Revelation through the western as well as the eastern regions, and exciting through- out the whole world that expectation of a Re- deemer, which was prevalent before the birth of our Saviour. — I have passed but slightly over these considerations. What I have said is, I trust, sufficient to shew you, that God's dealings with the Jews were adapted to the promulgation of his will to mankind in general, and that this mode of promulgation was well proportioned to the coexisting progress of human society. I shall at present delay you with only one remark, that what the Jews were of old, that are the Christians at present, the instruments of the promulgation of God's mercy to mankind.— " Ye are the lights of the world," says our Sa- viour, to his disciples. Let us beware, that we do not neglect the talent committed to our charge, that we do not conceal or vitiate that light, which should so shine before men, that, beholding our good works, they should glorify our Father, which is in heaven. It is not in- deed incumbent on us all to assume the office of preachers, but it is incumbent on us to promote the diffusion of religious knowledge, to adorn the doctrine, which we profess, and bear tes- timony of the hope, which is in us, by the pu- rity of our lives ; to walk worthy of the voca- tion, wherewith we are called. Not every pro- fessor of Christianity, not every instrument of 215 salvation to others, shall himself be saved. — Not all, that have borne testimony to the Di- vinity of the Saviour, nor even those, who have prophesied and wrought miracles in his name shall themselves be saved, but such as do the will of their God. Balaam beheld the visions of the Almighty. — Caiaphas exercised the gift of prophecy. — Judas declared the glad tidings of salvation, and confirmed them by supernatu- ral acts of mercy. — Let us, my fellow Christians, be obedient to the voice of God, and observant of his covenant, that we may be a peculiar treasure to him, whose mercy is over all his works, that we may be, not only the instruments, but also the objects, of his love, a Kingdom of Priests, and an holy nation. END OF THE FIRST VOLUME. LECTURES DELIVERED IN THE CHAPEL OF TRINITY COLLEGE, DUBLIN. BY FRANCIS SADLEIR, D. D. F. T. C. D. V DONNELLAN LECTURER FOR THE YEAR 1817. VOL. II. DUBLIN: RICHARD MILLIKEN, GRAFTON-STREET, BOOKSELLER TO HIS MAJESTY, HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUKE OF CLARENCE, HIS EXCELLENCY THE MOST NOBLE THE MARQUESS WELLESLEY, AND THE UNIVERSITY OF DUBLIN. 1822. D. GRAISBERRY, TR1NTBR TO THE UNIVERSITY. EXTRACT FROM THE Registry of Trinity College Dublin* WHEREAS a legacy of ^1243 has been be- queathed to the College of Dublin, by Mrs. Anne Donnellan, for the encouragement of re- ligion, learning, and good manners ; the. parti- cular mode of application being entrusted to the Provost and Senior Fellows : " Resolted, " L That a Divinity Lecture, to which shall be annexed a salary arising from the interest of £1200, shall be established for ever, to be called Donnellan's Lecture. iv " IT. That the Lecturer shall be forthwith elected from among the Fellows of said College, and hereafter annually on the 20th of Novem- ber. " III. That the subject or subjects of the Lectures shall be determined at the time of elec- tion by the Board, to be treated of in six Ser- mons, which shall be delivered in the College Chapel after Morning Service on certain Sun- days, to be appointed on the 20th of Novem- ber next after the election of the Lecturer, and within a year from said appointment. " IV. That one moiety of the interest of the said ,£1200 shall be paid to the Lecturer as soon as he shall have delivered the whole num- ber of Lectures, and the other moiety as soon as he shall have published four of the said Lec- tures ; one copy to be deposited in the Library of the College ; one in the Library of Ar- magh j one in the Library of St. Sepulchre ; one to be given to the Chancellor of the Uni- versity ; and one to the Provost of the Col- lege." ERRATA. VOL. I. Page Line 19 20 For read " For 20 2 him: him." 21 9 these those 23 25 I " I 28 me ; me.'' 30 2 furnance furnace 34 14 apeals appeals 40 17 subsidary subsidiary ... 24 Thery Theory 48 22 those those those 56 20 indispensible indispensable 64 13 themselves themselves, 80 2 injunctions injunction 85 25 injuction injunction 29 be a ashamed, be ashamed ; 91 26 paralises paralysis 93 13 darhness darkness 16 dapart depart 102 14 metaphisical metaphysical 124 7 oves over 20 occasionalbly occasionally 26 believed believeth 125 6 beleif, belief. 129 12 can may 22 waring warring 137 16 sobermindness ... sobermindedness 139 9 these ... those 159 11 referrable referrible 163 3 Ecletic Eclectic 21 Ecletics Eclectics 161 25 divideth divided 171 10 serve serves 15 feel feels 172 8 independant independent 205 1 were was 21 J 24 exclusively extensively ERRATA. VOL. II. Page Line read 18 16 confounded , - cause 28 19 indispensible indispensable 47 If sons 52 9 were 62 3 indispensable 67 2 te to 68 22 comeliness 72 25 with all 77 / description. 89 37 without hypocrisy without partiality, and without hypocrisy 91 4 unpolluted 21 indispensable 96 4 these 97 24 these 112 48 J O lying 114? 26 those 123 16 paralyse 124 14 authorizes 128 8 there 129 4 those 6 become 15 copy of the Bible, copy, 143 16 pert'ecter 146 8 those 151 15 paralyzed 154 24 beautiful 156 12 sinning 157 20 selections 166 5 not after 25 withheld 170 8 surface 173 26 selfishness 177 19 be are 23 there 195 23 desirable 196 10 independent LECTURE VI. Genesis, xviii — 19. And they shall keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment, that the Lord may Wing upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him. THE history of God's chosen people might seem, to a superficial observer, to afford but little evidence of their having derived much preeminence or advantage from the promises of the Almighty. Their protracted wander- ings, their slow and incomplete conquest of the promised land, the oppressions which they suf- fered from their neighbours, the division of their kingdom, and their successive captivities, might seem to belong to the annals of some unhappy and ill-regulated nation, rather than VOL. II. B 4 to those of heaven's peculiar favourites ; and to indicate, if any interference of the Deity, an interference rather to punish than to bless. To obviate this misconception, which has already been made a ground of obj ection to the sacred records, it will be useful to distinguish between God's declared purposes with respect to the posterity of Abraham as a nation, and as individuals ; — and to consider how the me- chanism of their history was subservient to the one, and the nature of their religious dispen- sation to the other. As a nation they were to be the depositories of the oracles and promises of God, — an holy of holies, in which was to dwell the manifesta- tion of pure and undefiled religion, — a nation of Priests and Prophets, whose institutes should be a promulgation of the will of God to the world at large, whose history should be an ex- ample, to mankind in general, of his moral government j — that the world might know, from the rising of the sun, and from the west, that beside Jehovah there was no other and, that in the posterity of Abraham, should all the families of the earth be blessed ; — blessed in that religious and moral knowledge, which their perfect their soul converting law afforded, and their history diffused j — blessed in that hope, I 5 which their testimonies held out, — testimonies, which were sure, giving wisdom unto the simple ; — and above all, blessed in that atone- ment, by which Christ, who was to be of them according to the flesh, should perfect the re- demption of mankind. On a former occasion [ endeavoured to shew you, how the events of their history were sub- servient to these purposes ; that their misfor- tunes as well as their successes, their captivi- ties as well as their establishment, their disper- sion through the inhabited world as well as their consecrated separation from its customs, contributed to render them instruments for the promulgation and diffusion of God's holy law and merciful promises, and permanent and no- torious monuments of his moral government. — I shall therefore, at present, proceed to the consideration of God's treatment of them as individuals, and the nature of that dispensa- tion, which he afforded them, as a means for ex- ercising their faith, and perfecting their holi- ness in the fear of the Lord, that they might keep the way of the Lord, to do justice and judgment, that he might confer on them those rewards of obedience, which he had promised, and bring upon Abraham that, which he had spoken of him. And here we must remark, that the prosperity of a nation, and the happi- b 2 6 ness of its individuals, though frequently and strongly connected with each other, are not always and entirely so. The nation may be triumphant, and the individual wretched. The nation may sink in the scale of fortune, and yet the individual may retain many of the more material blessings of life, his personal safety, his health, his estimation, his affluence, per- haps even his friends and kindred, the objects of his tenderest affections, may remain to him and while he laments over the misfortunes of his country, his sorrow may be alleviated by the consideration of God's personal mercies towards himself; — he may feel those mercies with tenfold sensibility, amid the general devastation, — with tenfold conviction, that they are the gifts of a God who is able to save. — Full of gratitude, of resignation, of confidence, his despair for his country may be turned into hope, and his tears into joy. The wretch who perishes in the battle, which overwhelms his country, feels not a greater pang, than he who falls in the onset of her victory ; for he knows not what comes after ; — he suffers individually, a less calamity, than had he died the victim of some protracted, some painful disease, even in the midst of private affluence and public prospe- rity. — The family, who are thrown outcasts on the world, deprived of comfort and support by some public calamity, feel it not more strongly, perhaps less strongly, than had it arisen from 7 private misconduct or private injustice.— No, my friends, public prosperity and private happi- ness, public misfortune and private misery, are by no means to be confounded with each other. — The springs of one are to besought for in the military and political talents of the governors, the sources of the other in the morals, in the hearts of the people. — History supplies numer- ous examples of the compatibility of public ag- grandisement with private unhappiness, and of public degradation with private respectability.— We ourselves have beheld a nation triumphant over Europe, the history of whose glory is unpa- ralleled in the annals of mankind, yet mingling with the shout of public exultation the cry of private misery, affording as unparalleled a scene of domestic misfortune and individual debase- ment, and finally owing the remission of these private calamities to their fall as a nation. A recollection of this distinction furnishes us at once with a mode of reconciling God's ap- parently inconsistent declarations respecting the seed of Abraham ; his promising, as in my text, and other corresponding passages, that they should do his will, and that blessing he would bless them, and his describing, by the mouths of his prophets, the outline of their future history, of which disobedience, punish- ment and degradation, seem to have been the 8 characteristics. It was convenient to his pur- pose of making them the vehicles of religious and moral knowledge to mankind, that they should be scattered throughout the world, and implicated with those nations, who were its masters ; he therefore permitted them to draw down upon themselves the calamities of defeat and captivity, by that disobedience, which is natural to the unaided heart of man. As he raised up Pharaoh to be a monument of his glory, so he raised up a stiff-necked and diso- bedient people to be the instrument of his mercy. But, while by the fluctuations of their fortune as a state, they fulfilled the designs of Provi- dence, it was consonant to the faithfulness and loving kindness of the Almighty, to bring upon Abraham all that he had promised, to show mercy on thousands of those that loved him and kept his commandments. — And the appro- priate object of human feelings, and conse- quently of those, which whether figuratively or otherwise, we apply to the Almighty, must be the individual, not the state. — The state, ab- stracted from the individual, is an ideal being, a creature of the imagination. It may be an object of the intellect, but cannot of the af- fections. It may afford a type, a figurative re- presentation, of the exercise of the affections, but not a reality. If a state were dissolved, and its members rendered happier, what breast 9 would feel either compassion or indignation ? — If a state were aggrandised, while its members remained miserable, what breast would glow with gratitude or love ? And accordingly we find, that the posterity of Abraham, while as a state they were the instruments of God's providence, as individuals they were the objects of his mercy. He gave them faithful promises, and sure testimonies of redemption, as an exercise for their faith ; he gave them a law which was holy, just and good, as an exercise for their obedience. He placed them in a land flowing with milk and honey, and under a government most conducive to in- dividual tranquillity. The Spartan polity was calculated for independence, the Roman for conquest, but the Jewish for private happiness. During the criminal folly of their kings, he re- served to himself a remnant, a remnant that had not bowed the knee to Baal. And when driven from that land, in which he had placed them» he caused them to find favour in the eyes of their masters. They appear to have been spread over the richest parts of the Assyrian and Persian empires, to have abounded in num- bers, and flourished in affluence and respecta- bility. We find them afterwards honored and protected by Alexander, and the Ptolemies, — caressed, and even exempted from tribute, by 30 the Romans, and possessing, almost during the entire time from their first captivity to the com- ing of our Saviour, the means of comfort, as individuals, far above the generality of man- kind. With respect to their religious state, the dis- pensation which was afforded to them, and by their means, to the nations with whom they were intermixed, demands our peculiar atten- tion. As in the preceding dispensation, so also in this, the promise of a Redeemer formed the grand feature, as it necessarily must have done in any dispensation antecedent to its ful- filment, that promise being the great object of faith, and faith being the exclusive instrument of salvation, the appropriate and only source of those affections, that gratitude and love, which while they consecrate the heart of God, give efficacy to our devotion, and value to our obedience. Let it not seem strange to any that I speak of faith in Christ, as a means of salvation an- tecedent to his coming. It is the language of the Bible. " By faith, Abel offered a more " excellent sacrifice than Cain. By faith, " Enoch was translated. By faith, Abraham " looked for a City, whose builder and maker is " God. By faith, the Patriarchs, not having 11 " received the fulfilment of the promises, but " having seen them afar off, were persuaded " of them, and embraced them, and confessing, " that they were strangers and pilgrims on " earth, desired a better country, that is a " heavenly, wherefore, God is not ashamed to " be called their God, for he hath prepared for " them a City." But while the Jewish dispensation agreed with the Patriarchal in this its leading characteris- tic, faith in the promises of a Redeemer ; it exceeded it in the clearness and explicitness of those promises. The declaration, that the seed of the woman should bruise the serpent's head, was of an ambiguous meaning, and apparently bore a sense unconnected with its real signifi- cation. The prophecy, that Shiloh should come, be- fore the sceptre should have departed from Ju- dah, and, that to him, should the gathering of the people be, was obscure as to the person de- signated by Shiloh. How this ambiguity and obscurity were adapted to the state of the Patri- archal world I have, on a former occasion, dis- cussed. Man had fallen through the want of confidence in the bounty and wisdom of God ; that confidence was therefore to be renewed by exercise and humiliation of mind. Hope, ra- 12 ther than assurance, was to be held out to man- kind. While they enjoyed the personal pre- sence of the Deity, had the promise been ex- plicit, the evidence would have been overpow- ering, and certainty would have precluded the exertion of faith. But, under the Jewish dis- pensation, as the personal intercourse of the Deity became less frequent, and at length was entirely suspended, the grounds of faith were to be made up by the encreased clearness of the promise. Accordingly we find all their cere- monial law, all their sacrifices, typical of the atonement of Christ, and prophetically pointing to that single object. We find Moses declar- ing, that the Lord should raise up a prophet like unto him, and enjoining them to obedi- ence. We find a series of prophecies describ- ing the character of this star, which was to arise out of Jacob, — anticipating almost all the detailed history, and the very name, of this branch, which was to spring from the stem of Jesse. His lineage was ascertained, his mira- culous birth described, his manners delineated, his sufferings depicted, his triumph over death and sin, and his Divine personality, foretold, in all the glowing imagery, to which the in- spired mind resorts, when it feels the common power of language too weak to convey its new ideas, or communicate its new sen- sations ; light succeeding light, in gradual succession, and forming the glorious dawn, 13 which preceded and indicated the rising of the sun of righteousness. The promises to the Pa- triarchs ensured a Redeemer, but were silent as to the mode of redemption. The promises by the prophets described that mode, and pointed to a vicarious atonement. The promises to the Patriarchs described a powerful Saviour ; the more explicit word of prophecy declared that Saviour to be God, that salvation to be eternal. " He shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, the " Mighty God, the everlasting Father, the Prince " of Peace. Of the encrease of his govern- " ment and of peace there shall be no end, from henceforth, and for ever." There is another feature of the Jewish dis- pensation, to which I wish to call your most earnest attention. That is, its being as to the knowledge of the mysteries of religion less per- fect than the Christian, though perhaps more so than the Patriarchal. AVhile it declared the unity of God, and that beside him, there was no other, (a principle which seems to have been not fully known to those, who mingled the worship of Jehovah with that of idols,) his Tri- nity in Unity does not appear to have formed an express part of its theoretical information. The same remark holds respecting the immortality of the soul, and the rewards and punishments of a future life ; they are not expressly declared, 14 they are not pointed to as sanctions. Though there occur many passages, which, now that we know the doctrine of the Trinity, now that we are assured of an hereafter, appear to have been allusions to those things ; antecedent to that knowledge, they must have been ambigu- ous, obscure, and perhaps inexplicable ; ante- cedent, I say, to that time, in which the day spring from on high shone on those, who sat in darkness and in the shadow of death, — when God visited his people, and the Gospel, those tidings of exceeding joy, brought to light both life and immortality. I am aware that there are some, who have denied, that there were even any intimations of those things under the Jewish dispensation, and that others have endeavoured to prove, that they were contained in it fully and expli- citly. But, an humble perusal of the Holy Scriptures will I trust convince you, that the truth, in this case, as in many others, lies be- tween the contending systems. With respect to the nature of the Supreme Being, his moral attributes alone are revealed in the Jewish dis- pensation, as appears from the passing of his glory before Moses, and the proclamation of his name. The combination of three persons in one God, though frequently alluded to, is not expressly declared, nor held forth as an ob- 15 ject of adoration. With respect to the immor- tality of the soul, it is not expressly affirmed, nor made that use of, which was reserved for the Christian dispensation ; though it is hinted at with sufficient strength, to have excited in the breasts of the faithful a hope, that, some how or other, they should enjoy the fruits of the promised redemption. They therefore are not to be heard, who assert, that the fathers looked only to transitory promises. How could it be so ? If it Were, what interest could they take in the predicted atonement, what part could they have in the Redeemer, what advantage could they hope from an event, which was to happen hundreds of years after they ceased to exist ? That they should have an advantage in it, they must have hoped and believed, because it was held out to them as such. But how that ad- vantage was to be, they could not conceive, be- cause it was not revealed to them ; they could not ascertain, though they might conjecture. It might be by some natural immortality of the soul. It might be by a partial resurrection of those, to whom the promises were given. It might be by some exertion of Omnipotence, which had never entered into the heart of man to conceive. Of the fact they were sure, be- cause it was pronvsed j of the means they were uncertain, because they were not declared. And yet, one of these points which was left thus ambiguous by the Holy Spirit, became the 16 grand, I may say the only, object of sectarian contention among the Jews. The Pharisee, who could close his ears to the morality of the Mosaic law, who could devour the property of the widow and the orphan, who could insult the majesty of God by substituting ceremonial observance for purity of heart, and while lie gave tithe of mint and anise, thought he might neglect the weightier matters of the law, judg- ment, justice, and mercy, yet on those specu- lative points, maintained a right opinion, and in his explication of those ambiguous allusions to an hereafter, might pride himself on his ap- proval of that which was more excellent. The Sadducee, on the other hand, erred in theory, but both erred equally in practice. Both erred in preferring the fancied understanding of what God had not fully revealed, to that justice, that mercy, that brotherly love, which he had ex- pressly and strictly commanded. And mark the consequence, my fellow Christians. These contending sects, when the light of the world came unto his own, would not receive that light. When the kingdom of God was offered to them, would not receive the peace and hu- mility of that kingdom. The Sadducee denied, and the Pharisee despised, a religion, which, though rich in speculation, was far richer in practice ; though abundant in the wisdom of the head, was far more abundant in the affec- 17 tions of the heart. And mark the consequence, I repeat, my fellow Christians. When that in- nocent blood, which they had imprecated on their heads, was visited upon them, when the great and terrible day of God's indignation had arrived, when the destroyer thundered at their gates, those religious dissensions were made the instrument of accelerating their ruin ; for the city divided by their seditions could not exert the obvious means of defence. We shall all be ready to admit the absurdity, and to condemn the folly, of this conduct. But, my fellow Christians, has the spirit of the Pha- risee and the Sadducee ceased to operate ? Are there no longer men, who prefer being wise be- yond that which is written, to the following of God's commandments ? Who prefer a faith in what is not revealed, to that faith, which is unto obedience. I will not make the applica- tion. Consider what has been said. And may that Saviour, who gave himself for you, im- press on your minds his great commandment, that ye love one another, and inspire your hearts with that most excellent gift of charity, which is the very bond of peace and of all virtue. LECTURE VII. Ephes-ians, i. — 9, 10. Having made known unto us the mystery of his will, according to his good pleasure, which he hath purposed in himself, that, in the dispensa- tion of the fulness of times, he might gather together in one, all things in Christ. AMONG the various modes, to which in- fidelity has resorted, for discrediting the evi- dences of religion, that of proposing questions concerning points, on which Scripture has not afforded us complete information, is one of the most frequent, and one of the most plausible. If left unanswered, they are considered as tri- umphant objections, if replied to, the advocate is counfounded with the casue, his imperfec- tions are charged on his subject, and his adver- sary, while he combats his weakness, fancies i 19 himself victorious over his religion. Of this description, is the question, proposed by unbe- lievers, concerning the time of the Christian dispensation. — Why, say they, was the promise so long delayed ? Why was the world left for four thousand years, in darkness and the shadow of death, their minds unenlightened, their sins unpardoned, their souls unredeemed ? In many cases of similar objection, perhaps the safest and best reply may be, that such was God's good pleasure, that such has been the decla- ration of scripture, and beyond that we neither know nor presume to speculate, that we will not, uncalled for, dare to mingle our weakness with the strength of God, nor fancy, like the faithless Uzzah, that his ark would fall should we with-hold our assistance. With respect however to the present question, the passage which I have chosen for my text directs us to a farther reply. While it declares, that it was God's good pleasure to gather all things together in Christ, it also expresses, that there was an appropriate time fore-ordained for that act of mercy ; it enables us to give a reason of the hope which is in us, by shewing, that the time of Christ's appearance was that appro- priate season, that predicted fulness of time, not only from its agreement with the pro- phetical character, which had been given, but also from its proportion to the state of society vol. ir. c 20 and the occasions of mankind. Its agreement with prophetical character is matter of fact, not of argument ; it is written in the book of God so, that he who runs may read. — The scepter departed from Judah, — the seventy weeks of years completed, — Simeon, and the entire peo- ple of the Jews, waiting for the consolation of Israel, — the whole East in earnest expectation of that star, which was to arise out of Jacob, evince at once, that the time of our blessed Lord's advent agreed with prophetical charac- ter, and that those, who were best qualified to judge, recognised it. While the weak subter- fuge of unbelieving Jews in the after ages, that the Messias was kept back beyond the appointed time, on account of the sins of their nation, proves unquestionably, that even prejudice and obstinacy cannot deny the agreement. With respect to the other view of the fulness of time, taken from the proportion of the Chris- tian dispensation to the state of society, and the progress of human improvement, (as it belongs more appropriately to the subject I have in hand,) I shall call your attention more particularly to it. And, I trust, I shall be able to satisfy you, that the Christian system, had it been given to mankind at an earlier period, would have been premature, and had it been longer delayed, would have been too late for the 21 occasions of mankind and the necessities of the human heart. The principle of gradual improvement and progress towards excellence seems to be an universal law in the works of creation.— While the Philosopher, in the pride of reason, might vainly imagine, that the effect of a perfect cause should itself be perfect, the humble observer of the works of God perceives, that none are per- fect, but that all are progressive, thai: none are at once produced in their best possible state, but that all, whether by the mechanism of nature, the instinct of life, or the guidance of reason, are led through successive stages of advancement. The insect has his day, the nobler animals a more protracted duration, and man, the last, best work of his Creator, requires a still greater period, for the developement and perfection of even his corporeal powers. But his time for mental improvement is yet more extended, and a prolonged old age finds him still increasing in experience and in wisdom. — As with the individual, so with the species. The progress of the human mind, the march of science, the advance of civilization, is gra- dual. Shall we, therefore, be surprized, if the dawning of religious light, its increase to the perfect day be gradual also. — If it be the gift of God, is it strange that it should bear an c 2 22 analogy to his other gifts ? Or rather, does not its being proportioned to these other gifts, prove that it also is the gift of God ? The tree of the forest grows from a trifling seed to gran- deur, to beauty, and protection. The influ- ence of God's word on the individual, the do- minion of the holy Spirit in his breast, increases from small beginnings, until it subjugates every thought of the heart, every motion of the will, goes on from faith to faith, from strength to strength, bringing forth abundant, and more abundant, fruits unto righteousness. And shall we be surprized, if the light, the aid, the strength, vouchsafed to mankind in general, to mankind as a body, as a race, be also pro- gressive ? Such was the vision of the inspired Ezekiel, when he beheld the waters break forth from the holy of holies. " And he, that had " the line, went forth, and measured a thousand " cubits, and the waters were to the ancles. " Again he measured a thousand, and the waters " were to the kness. Again he measured a " thousand, and the waters were to the loins. " Again he measured a thousand, and it was " a river, waters of swimming, a river that " could not be passed over. — These waters go " down into the desert, and into the sea, and " heal the waters thereof, and every thing " whithersoever they come shall live. — And on " their banks shall grow all manner of trees, 23 " which shall bring forth their fruit according " to their months, because their waters have " issued from the sanctuary." — Such is the Prophet's description of the progress of those living waters, which issuing from the throne of God, brought life, and medicine, and abund- ance, on their increasing streams, prefiguring thereby the growth of the Kingdom of God, the diffusion of the knowledge of his glory over the earth, the establishment of his domi- nion in the hearts of the human race, which when completed, shall realize those holy ideas, which the figurative style of prophecy has at- tempted to convey. But was the world, antecedent to the atone- ment, left unenlightened, unpardoned, and un- redeemed ? — The existence of God was known to them by tradition ; his attributes, by his works of Creation ; his promises, by the pro- mulgation of the Jews, which was of sufficient notoriety, its instruments being implicated with the greatest nations of the earth, and the suc- cession of universal monarchies, which began almost immediately after the Patriarchal form of government had ceased, conducing to that notoriety. — As to a law, they had the example of the Jewish institutions, and were, as the Apostle declares, a law unto themselves. — " At " their ignorance God winked j" for ignorance, 24 where it is not voluntary, is not culpable ; those who have not a law, are to be judged without a law. But were they left unredeemed ? The scrip- ture declares, that Christ died for the sins of the whole world ; and shall we deny, that by virtue of that atonement, past transgressions were pardoned, — pardoned, as justly, as those of the world which was then present, for as to both the mercy was gratuitous ; pardoned, as justly, as those which were then future, — trans- gressions against greater illumination and a more perfect law. — We, my fellow Christians, who sin against knowledge, have little reason to shut the gates of mercy on the Gentile world. -—But, it may be said, without faith, they could have no part on the Redeemer. — I have, on a former occasion, attempted to prove to you, that they, as well as we, had an object for faith. — "Wherever the Jews had been scattered, the promises of redemption had been also dispersed. — There therefore was opportunity for faith in the promises, faith in the mercy, faith in the efficacy of the law of God, the sound of which had gone forth into all lands, and its words into the ends of the world. — Thus might all share in '^at atonement, which was made for the sins of the whole world. Thus was the lamb slain from the foundation of the 25 world, for all periods had the benefit thereof- — Thus was the gospel preached to them as well as to us.— Were we indeed to take our notions of antiquity exclusively from Greek and Roman history, these opinions might seem to have little foundation beyond bare con- jecture. But when we consider, that these his- tories, however famous and interesting, extend but to a few centuries immediately preceding the birth of Christ, that the period, during which they were identified with the history of civilized man, did not reach perhaps to one cen- tury, that they contain the annals of govern- ment and conquest, but not the history of the human heart, we shall be inclined to look else- where for the account of God's dealings with mankind, and to seek, in the book of God, for the history of his elect. There we find Jonas, a prophet, whose authority is confirmed by our blessed Saviour, while he does not even men- tion Israel, preaching, and successfully preach- ing, repentance to Nineveh. So that his book appears to have been written to shew, that God is merciful to those, that repent, of what na- tion soever they be. And we find, that in an assembly, to whom the Gospel had not before benn preached, there were devout persons from every nation under heaven. So that the know- ledge of God's promises of redemption, ap- pears to have been very generally diffused 26 throughout the world ; perhaps as generally, in proportion to the numbers of mankind then, as the preaching of the Gospel has been since. The objection then is reduced to the question, why was not the light afforded to them abso- lutely greater than it was ; for we have seen, that its being comparatively less than what suc- ceeded it, would in vain be urged, progression being a natural characteristic of all the works of God ? If however it be asked, why was not the Revelation of religious mysteries more com- plete, and the law more perfect? We answer, that there is no degree of religious knowledge, short of absolute perfection, to which the same question would not apply ; and that, besides this, it seems to have been the design of Pro- vidence, to let mankind feel by experience, that the world, by wisdom, could not know their God, nor free themselves, by their own strength, from the dominion of sin. Adam had trans- gressed by seeking a knowledge beyond that which God had vouchsafed him, and prema- turely aspiring to a power of discerning good from evil. — His posterity had sinned after the likeness of his transgression, by seeking to have more complete ideas of the Divine nature than had been revealed to them, and being led there, by, through gradual corruptions of true reli- gion, to the grossest idolatry. — They sinned also after the likeness of his transgression, in 27 not resting satisfied with the simplicity of mo- ral law, which tradition and the voice of nature supplied them with, but seeking rather for false foundations of morality, and hewing themselves out cisterns, which would hold no water. — It was consonant therefore to the merciful wisdom of God, to let mankind feel their own weak- ness, and experience the insufficiency of that wisdom, which they had vainly hoped could ex- alt their nature from human to divine. — To this wisdom were they left ; not indeed entirely, for then all flesh would have corrupted their way, and even a single family could not have found grace with Him, who is of purer eyes than to behold iniquity. The history of the world is a detail of the gradual progress of a depraved nature to the destruction of the spe- cies, partially counteracted by means sufficient, though not overpowering, and occasionally re- quiring to be arrested by supernatural inter- ference. In the violence which filled the earth, and the deluge which destroyed it, in the pre- sumption which collected mankind displayed on the plain of Shinar, and the miracle which dis- persed them, in the impious cruelty of Pha- raoh and his subjects, and the Red Sea which overwhelmed them,— in the rise of successive empires to grandeur and civilization, their con- comitant increase in grossness of idolatry and corruption of manners, and the sudden destruc- 28 tion which came upon them, — we read the stu- pendous trial of human pretensions, the testi- mony of the hand of God against the power of man, " thou art weighed in the balance and " found wanting." It is an acknowledged fact, that the arts of civilization, that knowledge which is power, those inventions which contribute to enjoyment and security, have been constanly increasing. Though they may have had their reciprocations, they have been on the whole progressive. Though the wave may have occasionally reced- ed, the tide has been advancing over the shore. Now in a low degree of civilization, a less per- fect law is sufficient. Where manners are more simple, restraint is less necessary. Where temp- tations are less numerous, where the power of sin is less abundant, there a superabundant grace is less indispensible. The effects of the Christian dispensation are the atonement for the sins of mankind, the bringing in a more perfect law, a more perfect knowledge of the mystery of Godliness, and the more powerful assistances of the holy Spirit. With respect to the atone- ment, as it extended to the past, the present, and the future, to those who were afar off, as well as to those who were near, it mattered not at what period of the world it was effected. With respect to the greater perfection of its 29 law, it seems adapted to the highest degree of civilization, and therefore a less perfect law might be judged sufficient for a less advanced state of society. Its greater aids were less im- periously called for, and its greater information less commensurate with human intellect, not yet arrived at its proper vigour. We are by no means to judge of the civiliza- tion of ancient times, by the proportion which their acquirements bore to those of the present day. This would only indicate the degree of their advancement, but not its extent, which is by much the more important circumstance. The single art of printing, which we possess, has entirely changed the face of the world with respect to the extent of civilization. At pre- sent whatever improvements, whatever disco- veries some may have made, all may, and ge- nerally do, enjoy. But in ancient times wis- dom was confined to a few, the Priests of Egypt, the Magi of Persia, the Philosophers of Greece, held each their rank in the gradual scale of ci- vilization, but the great body of mankind fell immeasurably below the instructed few of their respective periods. Now the Christian dispen- sation, as I have said, does not seem adapted to this low degree of intellectual advancement. Even since its establishment, it may be remark- ed, that where from external causes, those na- 30 tions, in which it had been planted, have de- cayed and fallen back from the place which they had occupied in the march of improvement, re- ligion has decayed also. Where the nation has become barbarous, the spirit of Christianity has departed, and, in most instances, even the name been obliterated. Where is the Christianity of those once flourishing nations, over which the desolating tide of Turkish conquest has rolled ? — Churches had been planted by the hands of Apostles and Martyrs j they had heard with joy every one in his own tongue the wonderful works of God ; they had stood the fiery blast of persecution j but when the nation was thrown back to barbarism, the spirit of Christianity was withdrawn. And yet apparently the same cause, conquest by the followers of Mahomet, where it was not accompanied by a destruction of the arts of civilization, was not followed by a similar effect. The Christians of India sunk in the common ruin before the victories of a na- tion professing the impostor's creed j and yet Providence preserved to them their religion. Their civilization was left undiminished, and their Church, even the purity of their Church, survived. Compare the Christianity of those Indian Churches, with the religion of the mid- dle ages of Europe ; compare it even with the enthusiasm which arrogated to itself a place in the lists of the Reformation ; and judge whe- 31 ther Christianity and barbarism are compati- ble. Shall we therefore, some one may say, ab- stain from preaching the Gospel to uncivilized nations ? By no means, my brethren.—" Go, " and teach all nations," is the command of our blessed Master. I would only suggest to you, that, while you preach the Gospel to them, you also instruct them in the arts of life ; that you meliorate the rocky soil whereon you sow the good seed, else it will take no root and pro- duce no harvest. That, when you send forth missionaries, you choose such as add to their faith, knowledge, and to knowledge, brotherly love ; who can impart to their converts the be- nefits of civilization, and lead them to conjec- ture, by the temporal blessings they confer, the value of those spiritual gifts which they offer, gifts which must be received, voluntarily re- ceived, before they are enjoyed, and enjoyed before they can be appreciated. But I will not pursue a train of thought which would lead me from my subject. What I have said is I trust sufficient to shew, that the Christian dispensation is not adapted to the in- fancy of society, but is fitted for those on whom the ends of the world are come. On a future opportunity I shall endeavour to shew you, that 32 the state of mankind immediately preceding the advent of our Lord was, not only that to which Christianity was peculiarly commensu- rate, but was also such as absolutely required it. Now to God, &c. LECTURE VIII. Hebrews, vii. — 19. For the law made nothing 'perfect ; hut the bring- ing in of a belter hope did, by the which we draw nigh unto God. THE Apostle proceeds, in the subsequent verses, to declare the superiority of the Gospel dispensation over those which had been before ; that Jesus was made surety of a better testament ; 33 that he is able to save to the uttermost them that come to God by him, seeing he evei liveth to make intercession for them ; and that such an high Priest became us, who was not only holy and undefiled, but also who was made higher than the heavens. Why such a dispen- sation did become us, why such a mystery of Godliness was peculiarly adapted to the neces- sities of human society, I shall endeavour to shew you, by considering what was the state of mankind at the time of its being vouchsafed, and what are the natural effects of civilization on the human heart. At an earlier period, when the numbers of the human race were comparatively small, and the arts of life but little advanced, the single circumstance of all mankind being of one speech and one language, required a miraculous inter- position of the Almighty, lest they should restrain themselves from nothing, which they might imagine to do. — That coalition of the children of men, which was thus obviated by the descent of Jehovah, because it was then premature, had in effect been reproduced by the course of events, which Providence had graciously and wisely directed towards the con- summation of all things. The parts of human society which had been scattered abroad upon the face of all the earth, gradually encreased 34 into nations and kingdoms.— The necessities of an augmented population gave birth to the minor arts of life ; and the zeal for dis- tinction produced the more exalted. — The am- bition of the statesman, the pride of the war- rior, the avarice of the trader, even the worst passions of the human heart, were by that mighty hand, which out of evil still educes good, made to contribute towards the general advancement of society. Empire succeeded empire ; gradually recombining its scattered parts, each more extensively than the former, till at length the Roman dominion had reached every part of the inhabited world, and the whole earth was again, as it were, of one speech and one language. Here then, were we even to overlook the causes which obviously present themselves, and reason merely from analogy, we should see the necessity of a divine interfer- ence. Either the sons of men should again have been scattered asunder, or means, suffici- ently powerful to counteract the resulting evils of their coalition, should have been resorted to. — But the proportion which their encreased numbers now bore to the extent of the habita- ble world, rendered their dispersion impossible. — There was not space sufficient to break the continuity of human society ; — and while the continuity remained, a confusion of languages would have offered only a temporary remedy. — .35 Reasoning therefore merely from the similarity of the cases, we are authorised to conclude, that if in the time of Babel, a descent of the Almighty was necessary to check the presump- tuous vanity, the desperate wickedness of the human heart, which resulted from the combina- tion of mankind j the state of the world, at the time of our blessed Lord's appearance, required the application of a more powerful system. There is also another fact in sacred history, on which we may ground a corresponding argu- ment. — In the days of Noah, the earth was filled with violence, and God saw that the wick- edness of man was great, and every imagina- tion of his heart continually evil. And it re- pented the Lord that he had made man ; and he deemed it necessary to destroy him from off the face of the earth. — At the era at present under consideration, another period of civiliza- tion had been completed. — The steps of pro- gressive society had, in nearly an equal interval, been trodden over again.— Again were there instructors of every artificer. Again were there mighty men of renown. — The era of in- vention had been succeeded by that of con- quest ; and conquest by corruption.— The earth was filled with violence, and all flesh had cor- rupted his way.— It was necessary, therefore, either that God should again destroy the VOL. II. D 36 world, or, that his spirit should return to strive with man, and resort to unusually powerful means for his subjection. — But the former was inconsistent with his merciful promise, that he would never a second time smite every thing living.— Here, therefore, we are again autho- rised to conclude from analogy, that, at the time of our Lord's advent, it was requisite that more powerful means should be resorted to, — that the spirit of the Lord should raise up an ensign against the encreasing power of sin, lead captive its captivity, and give gifts to men. — But these arguments, some one may say, can have weight only with those who acquiesce in the authority of sacred history ; but with such as reject it, can be of no avail. — Even with such, however, they may have their use ; for they evince the consistency of the description, which the scriptures have given us of God's dealings with the world. The same God who destroyed mankind in the days of Noah, and who scattered them at Babel, would naturally have visited and redeemed them in the days of Christ. If we direct our enquiry towards the natural effects of civilization on the morality of man- kind, the argument thence resulting for the necessity of the Christian dispensation, will to all persons, I trust, appear conclusive. In the .37 infancy of society, in the lower stages of human advancement, where the occasions and induce- ments to criminality are few, there minor re- straints may be adequate, and inferior aids to human weakness sufficient : — but in its maturity they are not so. When the progress of science has given to man that wisdom which is power, — When the progress of arts has perfected his dominion, — when the combination of society has given to the individual the energies of the many, — where every thing conspires to encrease his powers, to excite his passions, to multiply his temptations, — where sin does more abound, there should grace be more abundant also. But let us take the matter in detail. One of the most obvious results of civilization is ine- quality of condition. — Let theorists fancy what they will, equality of rank, — of wealth, of la- bour, can have place only in savage life j and the greater the civilization, the greater the inequa- lity the greater the civilization, the greater will be the protection of property, the encour- agement of industry, the respect for superiority of intellect. — The appetite for wealth and power, the variety of disposition towards indus- try, the gradation of intellect, are inherent in the nature of mankind, and thereon does civili- zation ground a system of inequality, propor- tioned to her own strength, and durable as the D 2 38 foundations which support it. — Now what are the natural effects of inequality of rank, ad- vanced to a considerable degree, and in the ab- sence of the counteracting influence of religion ? In the higher ranks, pride with all its destruc- tive progeny, which strips the heart of its best affections. — In the lower an abasement of spi- rit, which degrades every manly principle, and makes ready the way for every crime.— In the middling orders, an union of those opposite, yet compatible vices, oppression and servility. — My hearers will recollect, that I speak of ine- quality, where the controul of the word of God is absent ; — of that pride, which in the heathen world, spread desolation and division among the families of the earth, esteeming the people as formed but for the glory of their rulers ; — and at the call of ambition, revenge, or caprice, sending forth their myriads to inflict, and to suffer misery. — I speak of the Eastern inequa- lity, which exacted adoration ; of the Grecian inequality, which sunk the servant below the rank of mankind ; of the Roman inequality, which taught the most virtuous of the citizens to behold with apathy the torture of a slave, and with enjoyment the death of a gladiator ; — where there was no meek spirit of religion to rekindle the feelings of nature, no Apostle to beseech the master for mercy to his offending servant. Would you know the effect of ex- 39 treme inequality on the inferior, look to the proverbial baseness of slaves, look to the sub- jects of every despotical government, where the greater the inequality, the greater is the deterioration of character. — But these are ex- treme cases, the comparison of the master and the slave. — How are the various orders, which lie between the rulers and the lowest of the po- pulation, affected towards each other ? Among these also, there must be gradation, there must be superiors and inferiors ; and where there are, there must be a proportionable degree of pride and servility. — But perhaps this might be re- medied by a republican form of government. — Little does he know of human nature, and still less of history, who imagines that such a form of government is compatible with a high de- gree of civilization. — It has been resorted to in states, which were emerging from barbarism, but perished when they came to maturity. — The diffusion of philosophy, the cultivation of the arts, the extension of commerce, ushered in, or, at least, were accompanied by, the downfal of the republics of Greece. That of Rome perished, when Grecian science and Grecian manners were ■ introduced. — Those of modem Italy scarcely outlived the revival of literature : — And all of them fell before that pride, which the inequality, resulting from civilization, pro- duced. The sufficiency of this remedy has been 40 tried also lately, and tried to the exclusion of Christianity, in a state, whose civilization was already advanced, and the result has confirmed, by a dreadful testimony, that the maturity of society is not the age of republics, and that nought can stay the pride of man from self de- struction, but the power of God. No, my fel- low Christians, there is no other remedy for this evil but religion, and that the meek religion of our humble Redeemer. From thence alone can that moderation be derived, which is de- scribed by a profound writer, as an essential principle in that form of government, whjch civilization naturally produces. Human society contains within itself the seeds of future cor- ruption, which the hand of Christ alone can stay. — There is death in the waters of the ocean, which nought can heal but those living streams, which the prophet beheld proceeding from the throne of God. Combined with the inequality of condition, and yet distinguishable from it in its effects, there is another inequality resulting from civili- zation, I mean that of riches. — Need I detail to you its effects in the unconverted heart, — the temptations, the snares, the foolish and hurtful lusts, which drown men in destruction and per- dition. — The luxury which riches produce, the avarice which they cherish, the injustice which 41 they give birth to, have been the theme of every moralist, aucl principally of those of the most civilized ages and nations. — On the other hand, poverty has, if possible, a greater effect, in blinding the heart, and darkening the under- standing. The vices and crimes, which wealth gives occasion to, find their instruments in the haunts of poverty. — There the conspirator seeks for his associates, the murderer and the robber for partners in their guilt. — There is no wicked- ness however degrading to human nature, or destructive to society, to which poverty may not tempt, or rather force mankind, when un- redeemed by the influences of religion.—- Do you not yourselves acknowledge this, in your praiseworthy exertions for diffusing Christian instruction among the lower orders, as the most appropriate remedy for general corruption ? In your following the steps of your Redeemer, and preaching the Gospel to the poor, which binds up the broken hearted, gives liberty to the cap. tive, and heals their infirmities. — You are right, — the poor of a civilized state cannot bear to be without religion. — It is the only remedy for their vices.— And, I beseech you to recollect at the same time, that it is also the only remedy for the vices of the rich. The evils resulting from the unequal division of labour, (and this inequality keeps pace with 42 civilization) although less than those of rank and wealth, are not entirely inconsiderable. — The infancy of society may bear an exemption from labour in many ; because the occupations of the chace, and the anxieties of that petty warfare which is natural to the half civilized state, may obviate that indolence which is the fertile source of crime, that idleness which is the root of all evil. But in civilized society, absence of employment is presence of tempta- tion. — The pursuits of literature may indeed oc- casionally fill the void ; but even these are not always such as deserve their appellation of puri- fiers of the soul, nor are their attractions influ- ential on the many. — Nothing therefore remains for those, whom their condition exempts from employment, but exposure to sin. — The house is swept and garnished, what shall prevent the entrance of the evil spirit and his worse asso- ciates into the empty habitation ? — Think if there be any thing which can, except it be the love of God shed abroad in the heart, calling on the ransomed sinner to visit his Redeemer in sickness and in prison, to feed him when hun- gry, to clothe him when naked, to receive him when a stranger, and to devote himself to the occupations of mercy. — But what are the effects of this inequality on those who eat the bread of labour ? Envy, and hatred, and impatience of their lot. — Civilization makes them feel their 43 inferiority, and it also makes them know their strength. — How long will they submit ? As long as they can be kept in ignorance, and no longer. — It is for religion alone, to give to la- bour contentment, and to close the bonds of love between the high and the low. — You yourselves have seen what was the effect on the labouring part of a civilized community, when their masters, with impious folly, taught them that Christianity was useless. — You all know that, in the heathen world, the labouring part of every nation was obliged to be kept in the condition of slaves. Nothing but abasement and terror and ignorance could secure their submission. But there are also other effects of civiliza- tion which tend to augment the power of sin, and therefore indicate the necessity of encreas- ed means of resistance. — When many have run to and fro, and knowledge has been encreased, when the arts have been perfected, and have created new sources of pleasure, new objects of desire, passions are excited with enhanced vigour, — temptations are multiplied, — even the intellect is rendered more keen, and directed to the pursuit of gratification. — Man beholds himself as a creature formed for enjoyment. The means are not at hand, the inclination is ready. — Self sufficient in that security, which i 44 society confers, he deems himself a superior being. — The world smiles round him like a se- cond Eden. He has tasted largely of the tree of knowledge ; and death— eternal death must be his portion, except the tree of life be placed within his reach. But perhaps I have dwelt too long on the elucidation of a principle, which, to many, may appear self evident, that civilization is self destructive without the accompanying influence of religion. It might, perhaps, have been suf- ficient to have exemplified it in those states of antiquity, which after they rose to a moderate degree of refinement, sunk beneath it ; — or in China, which although emerged from barbar- ism at a very remote period, although undis- turbed by external wars, although aided by every advantage of situation, has been station- ary, or rather retrogressive in her civilization, and lias never attained to that degree, which even the most recent Christian countries have arrived at. — On a future occasion I shall en- quire how the distinguishing characteristics of the Christian dispensation are peculiarly adapt- ed to counteract those evils I have adverted to, — to render possible, and easy, the progress of civilization to maturity, and, by enabling us to draw nigh unto God, — to ensure our perfection in this world, and our glory in that which is to come. LECTURE IX Isaiah, xxxii — 17. And the work of righteousness shall be peace ; and the effect of righteousness, quietness and assurance for ever. IN the sure word of Prophecy, which God has vouchsafed to mankind, we meet with repeated and vivid descriptions of a promised state of prosperity to the sons of men, when the wilder- ness shall become a fruitful field, and the fruit- ful field a forest, when enmity and violence and oppression shall cease, the lion couch with the lamb, and the weapons of war become the im- plements of joyous husbandry j visions of glory, which the Holy Spirit displayed, as a consola- tion to those who sat in darkness and the sha- 46 dow of death, a consolation to those whose hearts were such, as to kindle at the happiness of others, whose faith and confidence towards God were such, as to trust, that they them- selves should in some manner, though yet un- revealed to them, witness and experience this prosperity of future ages. These descriptions, which have been alluded to and repeated in the Revelations of the se- cond Testament, have given occasion to some persons of luxuriant fancy, to imagine an ac- tual presence of the incarnate Deity on earth, reigning, for a limited period, in temporal grandeur, and correcting by some miraculous interference, some instantaneous exertion of Divinity, all the natural and moral evils of mankind. Such theorists, however, seem to forget, that the Jews erred by mistaking a spi_ ritual for a worldly kingdom ; that the domi- nion of Christ is now and for ever ; the heart of man the declared throne of his power ; the affections and the will the appropriate objects of his sway. — They seem also to forget, that all the works of God are done, not suddenly, nor by miracles, which seem reserved for the evi- dence of Revelation, but gradually, and pro- gressively, by certain established laws, whether of physical, or of moral action. — The earth, which we behold decked with all the beauties of 47 vegetable and animated nature, with all its ine- quality of surface, all its arrangement of land and sea, so admirably adapted to the purposes for which it was designed, bears testimony, in its various strata, that the Almighty architect produced this wondrous beauty by the interven- tion of second causes, and the progressive ope- ration of these laws, which he has established for nature. Nor is the creation of the new man in righteousness after God, in the usual dispen- sations of Providence, the work of a moment. He is led from faith to faith, from strength to strength, until he arrives at the fulness of Christ, at the stature of the Son of God. — The action of moral motives is resorted to. While the spirit worketh in him, both to will and to do, his own exertions are commanded, and his life is the period of the mighty opera- tion. — Shall we then imagine, that the general perfection of the human race, the production of that state of earthly happiness, on which the eye of the Prophet has dwelt with rapture, is to be effected by some sudden, some single mira- cle, like that, which beyond the grave, shall in the twinkling of an eye, change our mortality to the likeness of our Redeemer's glory.— Or, that being a natural effect, and within the com- pass of natural causes, it is to be the result of gradual operation ; the faculties, the affections, the reason, and the industry of man, being in- 48 struments in the work of God ; while the Al- mighty ruler directs the action of those means towards his gracious purpose ; he, who maketh the winds his messengers, and the flaming fire the minister of his will, obviating whatever evil is in the efficacy of these second causes j say- ing to the madness of the people, thus far shalt thou go and no farther ; and counteracting the influence of a depraved and lapsed nature. This possibility of the melioration of man- kind by the intervention of natural causes, has produced in some minds a very opposite error. Forgetful that the means, though powerful, re- quire a Providence to direct them, and proudly rejecting the account of the degradation of hu- man nature, they imagine, that man can of him- self produce the perfection of society, and by the culture of his intellectual powers, the re- search of science, and the extension of disco- very, obviate the evils and imperfections of the material world, correct his own defects, render life a scene of virtue and of happiness, and at- tain that excellence for which he seems to have been designed. I have, on a former occason, I trust, satisfied you that this is impossible, and that civiliza- tion contains a self destructive principle, which gains vigour from its encrease, blasts the pro- 49 mise of its spring, and forces mankind through successive reciprocations of refinement and bar- barism. To correct this evil, to render the march of civilization secure, and capable of passing from refinement to perfection, is the work of Him of whom every good gift cometh ; and the means he employs are the influences of religion. Let us consider the characteristic features of the Christian dispensation, and we shall find how admirably calculated they are to produce the effect. The most prominent of these is the principle of universal benevolence, which we find so repeatedly recommended and enjoined in the writings of the Apostles. While they baptized, they also taught all nations ; and the heavenly instruction was, that they should love one another. This St. Paul declares to be the breast-plate of the Christian soldier, the fruit of the spirit, the fulfilling of the law, that more excellent gift, which is better than the power of mira- cles, and surpasses even faith and hope. — St. John points to it as the evidence, that the love of God is perfected in us, the criterion, by which we know, that we are passed from death unto life. The united voice of inspiration re- cognizes it, as the instrument whereby faith 50 worketh, the spirit, the teaching, which we have of God ; calling on us to love without dis- simulation, therein to be rooted and grounded, therein to walk, as Christ also loved us, and gave himself for us. Our blessed Redeemer himself marks it, as the characteristic of his Church, the seal of his chosen. " Beloved," said he, when on the eve of that sacrifice, by which God was glorified in the Son of Man, " a new commandment give I unto you, that " ye love one another. By this shall all men " know, that ye are my disciples." This commandment was novel unto the Jew, not indeed entirely as to its matter but as to its extent and enforcement. Though the law com- manded him not to hate his brother in his heart, but rather, by the minor offices of humanity, to advance towards conciliation ; to love his neighbour as himself, and to be merciful to the stranger, who sojourned with him ; yet it was silent, as to the extension of this affection to- wards mankind in general, and particularly, to those, who had provoked hatred by aggression. The silence on this point was such, as to admit those of old time to imagine, that they should hate their enemy, as well as love their neigh- bour. The Preacher asserts, that there is a time to hate, as well as a time to love, and even the Psalmist expresses his piety, by declaring 51 that he hates with a perfect hatred those that forsake the Lord ; and suffers even his personal feelings to excite a similar disposition when he repeatedly professes his hope, that he shall see his desire upon his enemies. Nor indeed does the full extension of this principle seem adapted to the Jewish system. The Jews were, in the earlier part of their his- tory, to be the ministers of God's vengeance against sinners. They were neither to spare, nor to have pity. Should transgression arise, even in their own community, the whole people were called on to be the executioners of the law. In the after part, they were to be kept isolated - from the customs of the nations among whom they were scattered ; therefore, a principle of attraction was not to be insisted on. The time was not yet arrived for the Apostolical precept, '* if any man obey not the word of God, ad- " monish him as a brother ; yet count him not " as an enemy." They were not yet strength- ened by the spirit ; and should therefore, in ab- horrence and hatred of the sinner, seek their safety from the contagion of his sins. " Be ye " separate, saith the Lord, touch not the un- " clean thing, ajid I will receive you." — Mark also the newness of this command, as to enforce- ment. The Jews were enjoined to love each other, that they might afford the beautiful spec- VOL. II. E 52 tacle of brethren dwelling together in unity. They were enjoined to love the stranger, be- cause they themselves had been strangers. But Christians *are enjoined to love, because Christ loved them, and gave himself for them. Still more new was this command to the Gen- tiles. The tradition of early Revelation point- ed not to it. The voice of nature in their breasts, by which they wore a law unto them- selves, though it led them from domestic love to that of kindred, and from thence to that of country, a name, which with them, comprised all the charities of human nature, yet there it stopped ; and, taking the form of an exclusive patriotism, bearing the exalted pretension of virtue, taught them to consider every foreigner as a foe, his strength as an object of their en- mity, his weakness of their ambition. Even the love of country often failed to include that of individuals. They imagined they could love their country, and yet exercise with each other emulation and wrath, strife and seditions. The contest of ambition they considered as virtue, its success as glory j and while they di- vided the spoil of their slaughtered adversaries, faucied it was gratitude, friendship, and libe- rality. Perhaps it might not be difficult to shew, that I 53 the universality of the principle of love would have been a gift disproportioned to the state of the heathen world, as well as to tke Jews ; — that the private partialities, the exclusive pa- triotism, with which its limitation was connec- ted, served to supply, in part, the place of more exalted virtues ; while the ambition and party spirit, which its absence permitted, tended to excite the powers of half civilized man, to effect those fluctuations of Empires, which the hand of Providence could guide, and produce that state of things, in which the Gospel sys- tem was requisite, and to which it was propor- tioned. But, when this state was produced, what were the effects of this new commandment ? When the civilization of mankind was draw- ing near to perfection, when the bonds of the Roman dominion had effected a combination and intercourse of the sons of men, which though that dominion has ceased, has, and will survive with encreasing, although fluctuating, vi- gour ; what, I say, must the natural effects of this new commandment be ? Can you imagine any principle equally powerful to remedy the evils resulting from civilization ? Antecedent to its influence, the aggregation of Society tends to corruption. The richer the parts, and the greater accumulation, the more rapid is E % 54 the progress of natural decay. But let this heavenly principle this breath of life be breathed into the organised mass ; animation and permanence and beauty supersede destruc- tion, and it becomes a living soul. The evils of inequality cease to operate. They are for- gotten. Its advantages acquire tenfold vigour. It becomes the cherisher of benevolence, the inciter of industry, the minister of order, the strength of civilization. — While mankind know, that they are brethren, not by the evidence of ancient history, but by the reciprocation of Charity, the voice of God within their hearts, they become a band of friends, each trusting to eacli for protection, and forgetting all selfish fear, in his anxiety for his neighbour ; a clan of kindred, where inequality weakens not the tie of love, but serves to secure common safety, and to promote common advantage. He of high degree no longer despises his inferior, no longer insults, no longer oppresses, no longer even neglects him. He feeis, that he is the miuister of God appointed to him for good. Pride has departed. Over whom should it glory ? Ambition is no more. Over whom should it triumph ? Duty has taken their place. And that duty has become inclination. The rich man ceases from the idolatry of covetous- ness, though his wealth has acquired an en- creased value. More fortunate than the East- 55 ern Monarch, he has discovered a new avenue of enjoyment, which, while it enhances the value of his money, forbids all injustice in its acquisition, all insolence in its possession. He must restrain his luxury. There is that in his heart, which calls more importunately than va- nity; more powerfully than sensual pleasure; and to the more urgent appetite he must sub- mit. He, whom his condition in life exempts from employment, is no longer without occupation. No longer does listlessness debase the powers of his mind. No longer does idleness invite temptation. He is called to a proud, an ex- alted, a pleasing office. He is called to be the Minister of Mercy ; to share the employment of angels; to be an instrument in the hand of God. Let the fastidious idler of polished an- tiquity fly to expensive folly for occupation. Let its monarchs seek, in trifling pursuits, ex- emption from the weariness of inaction. Let the profligate endeavour, by profusion of pa- trimony, of health, of character, to dissipate the indolence which affect him. The Christian, in whom religion has kindled the love of his brother, needs not such vanity. He can find, in the house of mourning, a pleasure, which the habitation of joy cannot supply. — In the haunts of poverty, even beside the bed of death, 56 are his enjoyments. To aid the struggles of fainting industry, to cheer the afflicted, to counsel the inexperienced, to be the orphans' father and the widows' friend, are his occupa- tions. And his reward is the extacy of in- dulged benevolence, and the anticipation of his eternal sentence, " well done thou good and " faithful servant." But, on the lower ranks of civilized and Christian society what are the effects of bro- therly love ? The poor man beholds in his su- perior, not an oppressor, but a friend. He feels himself treated, not as a servant, but as a brother beloved. He beholds " the powers " that be" ordained of God, for the common good, and joyfully fulfilling the object of their appointment. Against whom should he mur- mer ? Against whom should he feel indigna- tion ? Against whom shall revenge and suspi- cion excite him to form the secret conspiracy, or to resort to open violence ? Protection begets respect. Assistance begets gratitude. Love begets love ; and the sacred principle is enforced by the command of his Redeemer, and perfected by the spirit of his God. He beholds the rich man obedient to the charge of Chris- tian love, ready to give, and glad to distribute. He beholds the wealth of individuals tending to the excitement of industry, the promotion 57 of the arts, which give occupation and beauty to human life, while they increase and secure its enjoyments. The advantages, which partial accumulation diffuses throughout society, he already shares. Shall he not bless, rather than envy, the hand which imparts them ? Will he not feel that the yoke is easy, and the burden is light, which enjoins us to love one another ? Will the poor man, whose lot is a life of labour, feel indignant, that others are exempted, when he beholds their leisure devoted to acts of mercy ? I know not a more legitimate, a more natural object of affection, than this vo- luntary devotement, nor a more powerful re- medy for envy, than the love of those, who might have been its objects. And these are the fruits of that meek spirit, which declares to us, that we are members one of another, which raises our natural affection to the rank of virtue, and consecrates it to the imitation of God. They are exclusively its fruits. The polished nations of antiquity possessed no order of mercy. — Beside their stately temples, no hospital, no alms house, no school for the orphan, no retreat for the widow arose. What Athens could give to her glory, or to her policy, when she edu- cated the sons of her slaughtered soldiers, she never thought of giving to the call of mercy. The sage who descanted on the beauties of vir- 58 tue, a cold, a stern, an ideal virtue, never bent over the bed of poverty and sickness, never bound up the broken hearted, never loosed the captive out of his dungeon. In the retreats of science apathy was virtue. In the success of victory mercy was a stranger, and glory de- manded an accumulation of slaughter, an extent of ruin. In the busy scene of life compassion was unknown. The slave trembled, the debtor groaned in prison, the infant perished, and there was none to pity ; while civilized man presented a gloomy picture, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful. "But, some one may say, has Christianity re- moved all this ? Has she produced all those happy results, which a warm imagination may describe, as the natural consequences of that love, which she commands ? She is in the progress of producing these results. In pro- portion as her genuine influences have advanced, they have been efficient. " There is no clime " so inhospitable, no habitation of wretched- " ness so disgusting, no prison so dark and " deep, that Christian love cannot, and has " not led its votary to seek therein for objects " of mercy." When its diffusion shall have been complete, its effects will be universal. I draw no picture of an imaginary or impossible state.— It is possible, for its foundations are in 59 human nature. It will exist, when love shall be perfect. On a future occasion, I shall examine the other characteristics of Christianity, and ne- deavour to prove, that they also are highly con- ducive to the production of universal refine- ment. My argument is simple : civilization cannot, of itself, arrive at perfection : aided by Christianity it can. Jt has been asked, why was not Christianity given sooner ? Its princi- ples are not proportioned to the infancy of ci- vilization, though the maturity of civilization cannot exist without them. If, therefore, the perfection of the human race be the design of God, if civilization be its natural means, if that means cannot take effect without Christianity, and Christianity appears to have been given precisely at the crisis, at which it was requi- site, without doubt Christianity must be the gift of God. So that the very circumstance on which infidelity has grounded objections, af- fords, when fully examined, a most powerful proof in favour of our religion. LECTURE X. Matthew, v.— 38 and 39. Ye have heard, that it hath been said, an eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth.— But I say unto you, that ye resist not evil. AMONG the various arguments which evince that the religion we preach is of God, that, which may be derived from its proportion co the occasions of mankind, is not of the least convincing importance. A dispensation con- stantly breathing one and the same spirit, and yet varying its precepts, its illumination, and its aids, so as to adapt itself to the exigencies of progressive society, growing with its growth, and strengthening with its strength, must needs be the work of thai God, who has willed the 61 improvement of mankind, and directs the course of their events towards the perfection of his benevolence. While other systems, which the folly or the fancied wisdom of man had framed to satisfy the impulses of a natural devotion, or to strengthen the bonds of social intercourse, departing, by increasing intervals, from the source of truth, and mingling with the work of God, the fancies of a vain imagination ; — while such have had a transitory existence, have failed of their proposed effect, have even checked the march of civilization, have perished self-de- stroyed, and sunk before the beam of reason, the religion of the Bible has stood like the rock of ages, and Christianity is now the creed of civilized mankind. Christianity and refinement have gone hand in hand. Their advances have been commensurate. Their diffusion, —the ex- tent of the world over which they spread, is the same. Where one is, there is the other also, both as to time, and as to space. — They have been, they are, they must be commensurate, until in the perfection of both, shall all the families of the earth be blessed. The reason of this connection I on a former occa ion pro. posed to show you, by enquiring into the pecu- liar, the distinguishing characteristics of the Christian dispensation, and examining their proportion to the exigencies of civilized society. On an investigation of the principle of univer- 62 sal good will to mankind, I trust I satisfied you, that it is peculiar to Christianity, and indispen- sible to civilization. We have now to enquire into another kindred grace of the renovated child of God, to which our meek Redeemer has exhorted us, " but I say unto you that ye resist " not evil." What system of human invention, what sys- tem of philosophy, unenlightened by the sun of righteousness, ever did, or ever would, adopt such a precept. Ask even the wprdling of the present day,— with his Bible in his hand, with the name of Christian in his profession, with the mark of Christ on his forehead, he will tell you that the command of our meek Redeemer is figurative language, that it does not mean what it says. — He will tell you, that society cannot exist without the exercise of private vengeance, and will bear testimony to his opi- nion by his own example. Whether this be so, we shall presently en- quire, and shall, I trust, find, that the reli- gion of Christ accords with the dictates of sound reason, while the fancied wisdom of man is foolishness before God. But our immediate business is to shew, that the precept is peculiar to Christianity. And this its apparent unrea- sonableness, which has been urged by those 63 who were not Christians, and the labour which some, who thought they were, have taken to explain it away, its being one of the causes, why the cross of Christ is an offence to the world, indicate that it is not likely to be a part of any other system ; while a slight retrospect will confirm us as to the fact. — It is not found in the code of Mahomet. When he stole a system of morality from the Christian scriptures, he left this neglected, this despised, virtue behind him. — It forms no part of Indian ethics, though untold ages are said to have thereunto contri- buted their wisdom.— Antient superstition re- cognized it not, but instead thereof raised a temple to vengeance. Antient philosophy de- spised even the forgiveness of injuries, as weakness and folly, declaring that the wise man never pardons, never commiserates. — Even the Roman orator, whose comprehensive mind had embraced the varied systems of Grecian ingenuity, professes, that the injured man, who will not assuage his own anguish in the agony of the offender, is guilty of inhumanity ! And, in another place, beholding the truth as through a glass darkly, and grasping at the distorted image, with the utmost energy of un- aided intellect, " I know not" says he " whether " there ought not to be moderation in venge- " ance ; whether it be not enough, to make 64 M the offender repent him of the injury, and " to render others more slow to aggression." But, perhaps, it may be supposed, that though profane systems did not recognize this virtue, it may yet have been enjoined in the Jewish dispensation, and have formed a part of that perfect law, which was to convert the soul, those sure testimonies, which were to give wisdom to the simple. — Here, however, on enquiry, it is not to be found ; as indeed our Saviour's expression, " it was said by them of " old time," would seem to indicate. For, we cannot suppose, that the tradition of the Jewish teachers would pronounce any thing expressly contrary to a direct precept of their law, had any such existed. The virtue of abstinence from private revenge, of refraining from resist- ing evil with evil, seems to have been one of those, which the Almighty did not consider as adapted to the state of the old world, and, therefore, neither led them to it by the light of reason, nor commanded it by the voice of re- velation. — Hardness of heart was the result- ing characteristic of their degree of civiliza- tion.— -And because of that hardness, was the law of God silent as to this virtue. In addition to the negative argument from the non-existence of any such precept in the 65 Jewish code, we may also add, that we find that code recognizing the private avenger of blood, in the appointment of the cities of refuge, which, against a public avenger, would have been superfluous, or absurd. — And we find many expressions in the old Scriptures, which evince that private revenge was not, by the Jews, considered as criminal. — In Saul's com- mendation of David's conduct, when he spared his life, he implies, that he had shewed him more mercy than he was obliged to, " When the " Lord delivered me unto thine hand thou " sparedst me ;" and appeals to common usage, and common opinion, for the excellence of his conduct. " If a man find his enemy, will he let him go well away ?"— We find David, the man after God's own heart, and who often proved himself so by mercy towards his enemies, turning away from vengeance against Nabal, not as from the commission of a crime, but as refraining from the exercise of an undoubted right, through compassion towards a female. — We find him, in other places, cursing his ene- mies, and that most bitterly ; " Of thy mercy, ** Oh Lord ! cut off mine enemies." We find the author of Proverbs utteringt his counsel, " Rejoice not when thine enemy falleth, lest " the Lord turn his wrath from him." And again, in that passage, which the Apostle has partially quoted, where he recommends doing 66 good to our enemies, he does so, on the grounds of prudence, not of duty. " If thine " enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat ; if he "be thirsty, give him water to drink ; for thou " shall heap coals of fire upon his head, and " the Lord shall reward thee." These passages are, I believe, sufficient to shew, that resent- ment was neither forbidden in the Jewish code, nor considered as criminal by the Jew- ish teachers. Their law seems to have gone no farther, than merely to forbid the excessive exercise of vengeance of Jew against Jew ; and their teachers to have recommended the ap- pearance of compassion, either as a means of removing the hatred of the adversary, or else of ensuring his destruction.— That heavenly temper of mind, in which meekness, mercy, and benevolence, unite to withhold the child of God from the conflict of revenge, to lead him to do good for evil, and in the perfection of godliness, like his Father which is in heaven, to love those that hate him, like his Redeemer to confer blessings on those that despitefully use him and persecute him, — seems to be peculiar to the Christian dispensation, that better thing which was reserved for us, on whom the ends of the world are come. — Congenial with refine- ment, because it gratifies the noblest feelings of magnanimity, its fullness of time is, when the progress of civilization, emancipating man from 67 the continual necessity of self-protection and self-support, gives opportunity te reflection, ex- ercise to sentiment, and vigour to the sense of moral beauty. — Adapted to civil order, because, while it contributes to the perfection of that or- der, it is injurious to the possessor, exactly in proportion to its imperfection, — it would have been unfitted for the old world, when the in- fancy of police, and the weakness of law, left room for the frequency of the utmost aggres- sion, and rendered self-defence a duty, which the individual owed to his country. — If it be true, that laws are silent among arms, it is equally so, that in the absence of law, arms be- came necessary. — Had the virtue of forbear- ance been enjoined to the Jews, antecedent to the regal state, when every man did whatsoever was right in his own eyes, they could not have existed as a society, without the exertion of a continued miracle in their favour. — Even in the regal state, when the sovereign was the single and sole dispenser of justice, and the capital the only seat of its exercise, this virtue would have been incompatible with that mixture of public and private exertion, which was required for general security. — In their captive state, where they were often entirely, and always in a great measure, out of the protection of the laws of their masters, self protection was hu- manly speaking the only means of preservation. VOL. II. F 68 And accordingly when permitted by Ahasuerus to avenge themselves of their enemies, we find them doing so with all the feelings of duty to their God and to their nation. As in the individual, the passion of anger is implanted, to obviate the slowness of delibera- tion in cases, where instantaneous action is re- quisite for safety, so in the civil system, has the exercise of private vengeance been permitted, to obviate the imperfection of civil order. — When reason in the one is perfected, whether by the natural or supernatural influence of God, anger ceases to be necessary. When civil order becomes perfect in the other, private vengeance becomes criminal. The grace of meekness is thus adapted, not to the infancy, but to the ma- turity of civilization.— And even in that matu- rity, the individual, who has not partaken of its benefits, cannot receive this grace. — The man of uncultivated mind, unexcited sentiment, unmeliorated heart, cannot receive it. — It has no form of coinliness, whereby to attract him. — It seems to him contemptible, and full of sor- rows. — Even in the progress of the Christian Church, every reciprocation of refinement was attended by a proportionate ebbing of this vir- tue.— When ignorance and barbarism, follow- ing in the train of war, had spread their bale- ful influence over Christian Europe, though 69 Christians preserved in their hands the history and the teaching of their mild Redeemer, yet the meekness of that Redeemer had departed from their hearts. — Even their very clergy ri- oted in the gratification of a proud, vindic- tive, and unmerciful spirit. — Such was the in- compatibility of meekness with a barbarous state of society, that Christian Churches were led to imagine, that the infliction of misery on their enemies, instead of being an abomination to a God of mercy, would be a sacrifice pleasing in his sight.— The prevailing party of the day put their adversaries to the sword, as an act of re- ligion — Personal vengeance received the fan- cied sanction of consecration, and the soldier, when he pledged himself at the altar of God to aid the weak and defenceless, to protect the cause of the orphan and the widow, pledged himself also never to bear insult to himself un- revenged. So incompatible are meekness and barbarism. — 'And mark the consequent arrangement of Providence.—- -Though Christianity had been preached to Europe, yet during this darkness was its spirit withdrawn, its influence suspend- ed. — The book of God was permitted to be closed on the people, because it was not fit for them.— Though the phantom of Christianity sat enthroned in pomp and power, the reality f 2 70 was gone, had fled from the palace and the busy haunts of men, to company with the re- liques of literature and refinement, within the walls of some neglected cloister ; until the hand of God dispelled this gloom, and the sun of righteousness burst through this thick dark- ness. — It is a wonderful, but not an unaccount- able coincidence, that the revival of civilization should be contemporary with the revival of Christianity ; — that when the heart of man had been refined by restored literature, — ennobled by restored order, — emancipated from the sla- very of ignorance, — again should the beauties of the Christian character be presented to his view, and the book of God again committed to his hands, declaring, that " blessed are the " meek, for they shall inherit the earth," Perhaps it may here be asked, would not this view of the subject lead us to assert, that the precept of non-resistance is imperative, only where civilization is nearly perfect? This, however, must not be admitted ; for though the Almighty works our salvation from the power of evil, by so ordering the course of the world, so cherishing the improvement of man, as to fit him for the reception of the Christian character, by enjoining its graces as duties, and perfecting them by the influence of his Holy Spirit, — yet maa is himself called on for exer- 71 tion, and while God gives him the power to do, and excites his will to obedience, is required to work out his own salvation with fear and trem- bling. — Since the command has been uttered, while the Bible is within our reach, we cannot be a law unto ourselves, for we have the law of God.-— The command must be obeyed, though occasionally injurious to the agent. — The mercy of God has given it under circumstances, where obedience is comparatively easy. If it be not entirely so, our part is resignation. As an advanced state of civilization is best adapted to the exercise of the virtue of meek- ness, so is this virtue absolutely requisite, for the preservation of that state, and its advance- ment to perfection. — Civilization encreases the avenues of injury. — Refinement sharpens the feelings to insult. — Even the multiplication of authority, which an improved civil order re- quires, gives occasion to numberless instances of the appearance of aggression. The exer- cise of official duty must often, to its objects, bear the semblance of harshness, injustice, or even cruelty. The requisite assertion of rank must sometimes appear like insolence. — And of those, a meek and quiet spirit, that suftereth long, is kind, that beateth all things, endureth all things, and thinketh no evil, is the only al- leviation. — Even real aggression, real injuries, 72 must be frequent, which, if privately vindicated, would bring us back to the times of feudal war- fare, or the more polished era of Italian assassi- nation. Is it not a remarkable fact, that the se- veral nations of the heathen world, which rose to the highest state of civilization, perished by one and the same cause, the dissensions and private animosities of their leaders ? Even in our own days, when the experiment was tried, of how a highly polished state could exist with- out the Christian spirit,— the primary cause which produced its failure, was the private ani- mosities of its philosophical contrivers. Shall we then, some one may say, leave ag- gression unrestrained ?— By no means. — Nor is this the meaning of our Saviour's precept.— All the laws, all the exhortations to mutual protec- tion remain in full force. — It is only from the hand of the injured himself the vengeance is taken j as is evident from the context. — And, farther, it is only in cases of moderate injury, that we are restricted from self-defence ; cases, under which, to use the expression of the Apos- tle, it may be possible for us to live peaceably withal I men. And yet this the philosopher of the present day, too self-sufficient to be a Christian, or to be proud to obey his Saviour, will not receive. 73 — He declares private vengeance to be requisite for society, and has devised a code of honor for its exercise. — How is it requisite ? How is it useful ? — It prevents the enactment of laws to remedy the supposed injuries. — It prevents the combination of others for the protection of the injured. In short, it stops, instead of promot- ing the empire of the laws and the perfection of civil order. At present he extends it only to the higher ranks, and proposes by it to re- medy all contemptuous language. — Suppose he were to extend the same remedy to all ranks ; (and I see not what reason he can assign for not doing so,) then all laws against slander, or at least the enforcement of them, would cease; for the disgrace of appealing to law would be greater than the injury of the slander. — Sup- pose he were to extend it to the remedy of other offences ; laws against those offences would cease to be appealed to. — I need not de- scribe the progress, by which reason would lead him, that has forsaken religion, from the ad- mission of the necessity of private vengeance, until she would leave society destitute of law, and the individual in the condition of the sa- vage, his hand against every man and every man's hand against him. There is another peculiarity of the Christian dispensation, which supplies farther, and am- # 74 pie, evidence of the powerful efficacy of that system towards the perfection and happiness of mankind. I mean the strength and undivided dominion, which it gives to the principle of Love to God ; that principle which the Holy Spirit sheds abroad into the hearts of his chosen, awakened by gratitude and admiration, perfected by the conviction of the antecedent and everlasting love of the Redeemer. It needs but little research to prove, that this motive of obedience belongs exclusively to the religion of the Bible, and that its perfection is peculiar to the completion of that religion, in the Gospel of the new and better covenant, which writes the law of their God on the hearts of his people. I shall not now however expa- tiate on the perfection of this heavenly prin- ciple ; as I have already, so often, from this place, called your attention to its efficacy. What I have said is, I trust, sufficient to sa- tisfy you, that the progress and completion of revealed religion, as detailed in the Holy Scrip- tures, by the proportion which it has always borne to the wants and weaknesses of mankind, bears an internal evidence, that the Religion of the Bible is assuredly the gift of the All-wise, Almighty, and All-merciful God of Nature. SERMONS PREACHED IN THE CHAPEL OI TRINITY COLLEGE, DUBLIN, IN THE YEAR 1817. SERMON I James, iii. — 17. But the Wisdom that is from above is Jirst pure, then peaceable, gentle, easy to be entreated, full of mercy and good fruits, without parti- ality, and without hypocrisy. SUCH, my fellow Christians, is the description of that wisdom, which is the gift of the Holy Spirit, of that Spirit, which, the Prophet Isaiah declared, should rest on Him, who was to spring from the stem of Jesse : — " And the spirit of " the Lord shall rest upon him, the spirit of " wisdom and understanding, the spirit of " knowledge and of the fear of the Lord." — And as it rested on our blessed Redeemer, as the Baptist beheld its descent, as the disciples 78 of our Lord witnessed its effects in his life and doctrine ; so, according to his gracious promise * of sending a Comforter, did the spirit of wisdom descend on the Church of Christ ; and so, according to his gracious assurance that he would not leave us comfortless, does it still rest upon it, leading the humble Christian to be wise unto Salvation, — pointing out to him, that the knowledge of God and of his Son Jesus Christ is, in its influence on our lives, purity, mercy, and sincerity ; in its fruits, hope, and joy, and peace unspeakable. The sacred season, which we now celebrate, in commemoration of the descent of the Holy Spirit on the Church of Christ, suggests to me the propriety of calling the attention of the younger part of my hearers to a few of those passages in Holy Writ, which more immediately authorize us to consider the Holy Spirit is a person of the Godhead. And I shall do this, more to remind them, that there are abundance of such authorities, should they ever be called on to give a reason of the hope which is in them, than through any fear of its being requisite for their own private conviction. — No, blessed be God ! the divinity of the Holy Spirit has never been questioned by Christians never denied but by those, who have also denied the Lord who bought them. And, on the other hand, 79 none, who have refused to admit the divinity of our Redeemer, have ever acknowledged that of the Holy Spirit.— It is a singular fact, that among the numerous heresies, which from time to time have obscured the truth of Christianity, among all this caprice of tenet, partiality of ex- position, and variety of error, none has ever arisen, which has rejected the one, without also rejecting the other. — Of this fact, perhaps, we may find the solution in the declaration of Scripture, that no one can say, that Jesus is the Lord, except by the Holy Ghost. When our blessed Redeemer, having tri- umphed over death, sent forth his Apostles, that the uttermost ends of the earth might know the Salvation of God ; — " Go ye,'' said he, " and teach all nations, baptising them in the " name of the Father, and of the Son, and of " the Holy Ghost."_And, from the beginning of the first Epistle to the Corinthians, we learn, that Christians were baptised in no name infe- rior to that of God. — At the conclusion of the last Epistle to the Corinthians, we find the Holy Spirit again joined with the Father and the Son, in the blessing of the Godhead, which the Apostle invokes for the Church ; — " The peace " of the Lord Jesus Christ, the love of God, " and the communion of the Holy Ghost." — And again, in the first Epistle to the Corin- 80 thians, the Apostle, speaking of the gifts of God to the Church, says, " there are diversi- " ties of gifts, but the same spirit, and there " are differences of administrations, but the " same Lord, and there are diversities of ope- " rations, but it is the same God, — which work- " eth all in all.*' — Now, if God worketh all in all, assuredly " God" must be the " Lord of " whom are the differences of administrations," and the " Spirit of whom are the diversities of " gifts." — I have called your attention to these three texts, both because, each of them seems to me to be fully conclusive on the point, and also because, they afford us three different forms of arrangement of the persons of the Trinity. In the first it is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. In the second it is the Son, the Father, and the Holy Ghost. In the third it is the Holy Ghost, the Son, and the Father. As if to obviate any idea of inequality, which might arise from the order of enumeration. If we refer to those passages of Scripture, which relate to the creation, redemption, and sanctification of mankind, those blessings, for which we have been just now returning our most humble and hearty thanks to Almighty God, the Father of all mercies, we shall find the presence and action of the Holy Spirit re- cognised, distinguished, but not divided from 81 that of the Father and the Son.— We find the Psalmist declaring, that by the Word of Jeho- vah were the heavens made, and all the host of them by the Spirit of his mouth. — The author of Genesis describes the Word of God as creating the light, and his Spirit as diffusing itself throughout the waters.— Job professes, that " God by his spirit hath garnished the " Heavens," and again, The Spirit of God hath " made me, and the Spirit of the Almighty " hath given me life." In the beginning of St. Matthew, the Angel speaking to Joseph of Mary, says, that which is conceived in her is of the Holv Ghost. — And St. Luke describes the Angel as disclosing to Mary, that, " that holy thing which should " be born of her, should be called the Son of " God." When St. Paul, in his Epistle to the Romans, describes the victory of our Redeemer over sin, " they that are in the flesh" says he " cannot " please God, but ye are not in the flesh, but " in the spirit j if so be the Spirit of God dwell ** in you." — " If any man have not the Spirit " of Christ, the same is none of his. — But if the " Spirit of Him, that raised up Jesus from the " dead, dwell in you, even he that raised up " Christ from the dead shall also quicken your 82 " mortal bodies." — A passage which manifestly identifies with each other the Spirit of God, the Spirit of Christ, and Him, that raised up Christ from the dead. — In the Epistle to the Corinthians, having our bodies the Temples of God, and the Temples of the Holy Spirit, are represented as one and the same thing. " Know " ye not, that ye are the Temples of God, and " that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you ?"-•• And again, " Know ye not, that your body " is the Temple of the Holy Ghost, which is " in you, which you have of God ?" In the story of Ananias, and Saphira, to lie unto the Holy Spirit is represented as lying unto God. — In many passages of the Scripture, the inspiration, by which holy men of God spoke as they were moved, is represented as the im- mediate act of God ; — in others, it is repre- sented as the immediate act of the Holy Ghost ; assertions which would be entirely inconsistent, except the Holy Ghost be God. But, my fellow Christians, the time usually alloted to a discourse from this place would ill suffice to recite all the Scriptural authorities on this subject. — That the Holy Ghost is at once distinct, and inseparable from the Father and the Son, is a doctrine, which runs through the entire texture of revelation ; — a doctrine, which 83 if we receive, all the passages on the subject are clear and consistent with each other ; — but, if we deny, they are obscure, and irreconcile- able : and he, who begins by rejecting the di- vinity of the Holy Ghost, is likely to end by completely refusing the authority of Scripture. Nor is this doctrine to be considered as a mere question of speculation unconnected with practice. — 'Can there be a stronger incentive to the regulation of our affections, and the puri- fication of our hearts, to the cherishing of every holy desire, the cultivation of every im- pulse to resist temptation, and to fly from sin, than the conviction, that these holy desires, these good counsels, which Scripture declares to us are the work of the Holy Spirit, are, in so being, the immediate act of God? — What more abundant source of comfort and of hope, what more powerful support of patient continu- ance in well doing can there be, than being, by every approbation of virtue, every abhorrence of vice, every feeling of humanity, which rises in our minds, constantly reminded, that God is present with us, that we are the objects of the care and love of our Creator?— Oh my fellow Christians ! which will the man, who at- tempts to persuade himself, that these are only the voice of nature, the suggestions of his moral sense, and that the Holy Spirit means VOL. II- G I 84 merely good inclination, or perhaps some sub- ordinate undefined existence,— which will he be more likely to be led by them, or, the Christian, who feels them, with gratitude, as the mercy of his Redeemer, and with awe, as the voice of his God ? — assuredly, he, who hath this hope in him, purifieth himself even as He is pure.— And, accordingly, we find, that purity is the first characteristic of that wisdom, which is the gift of the Holy Spirit,— the earliest effect of that guidance, which, if submitted to, will lead us into the glorious liberty of the Sons of God, that we shall no more be the servants of sin ; — -which will lead our hearts to appreciate, and to enjoy, that pleasure, which results from being kindly affectioned one towards another ; and teach us to cherish the feelings of gra- titude and love to God, as the source of our greatest happiness. — But, my fellow Christians, without purity of mind, it is impossible we can have brotherly love. — The natural depravity of man's heart, when cherished, when cultivated, when suffered to take the ascendancy, vitiates the imagination, so that she represents every thing to us under false colours, calling bitter sweet, and sweet bitter, putting darkness for light, and light for darkness ; — degrades me reason, so that it cannot distinguish good from evil,— so that it mistakes the gratification of the senses, for happiness, — so that it attempts to se- 85 parate, what God has joined by a natural and un- changeable bond, true self love, and public affec- tion. Where the heart is impure, no good thing can dwell, no good fruit can issue ; the feelings of humanity, the ecstacy of benevolence, the in- fluence of the Holy Spirit inciting us to brother- ly love, are absorbed in a blind and sensual selfishness, which, like the deaf adder, closes her ears to the voice of the charmer, charm he never so wisely. — Avarice may occasionally sa- crifice that wealth, which she so highly values, to the pleadings of humanity ; ambition may stop her career, for a while, to listen to the voice of mercy ; but sensuality is deaf to every call, except that of self-gratification. — " Be ye ** not drunk with wine," says the Apostle, ** wherein is excess f or, as it might be bet- ter rendered, wherein is insanity ; marking, by the instance of a single species of sensuality, its destructive effects on the powers of the mind, and the affections of the heart ; " but " be ye filled with the Holy Ghost."— -How strange at first view appears this juxtaposition of ideas, which seem scarcely to have suffici- ent relation to entitle them to be mentioned even in opposition with each other ! — Yet, if we consider it, we shall find it grounded in the total incompatibility of any species of impurity with submission to the guidance of the Holy Spirit. c 2 86 Need I tell you, my fellow Christians, that sensuality, as it thus excludes us from active good will to man, so it still more strongly pre- vents us from feeling in our hearts the love of God ? — That principle which at once facilitates our obedience, and renders it a source of enjoyment. Can the sensualist love that God, whose chastisements he dreads, and whom he knows to be of purer eyes than to behold ini- quity ? — The first symptom of the corruption of human nature was that Adam hid himself from the presence of the Lord ; and the earliest ef- fect of criminal indulgence in the individual is enmity against God. — Who are ever most ready to forward the attacks of sophistry against re- ligion, — to ridicule the love of God in others, and to pursuade themselves, that they doubt even his very existence ? — Look abroad into the world, and you will see, that they are those who are given up to sensuality. Those, whose habits and enjoyments are most at variance with the purity commanded by God, — will have their hearts most estranged from his love. The next part of the description of that wis- dom, which is the gift of the Holy Spirit, is, that is peaceable, gentle, and easy to be en- treated. — The purity of the heart being esta- blished, reason is restored to her genuine pow- er, the turbulence of passion is assuaged, and 87 the tranquillity consequent thereon diffuses it- self throughout the whole character, and in- fluences the outward conduct — How different is that wisdom, in which the children of this world are said to excel in their generation !- — Ever anxious for individual advantage, exclu- sive agrandisement, esteeming all happiness as only comparative, undervaluing every enjoy- ment in which others can equal them,— jealous of every thing that looks like competition or ' encroachment, alive to every semblance of the slightest injury against themselves, yet slow to perceive, and still slower to acknowledge, their own injustice, — their hand is against every man, and every man's hand is against them. — The fruits of that wisdom, which is foolishness be- fore God, — the issues of the heart of man, when alienated from the guidance of the Holy Spirit, are described to be hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, envying, and murders :— But, the wisdom, that is from above, does not merely cleanse us from impu- rity, and free us from crime : it also leads us to practical virtue ; giving efficiency to our bene- volence, and action to our obedience. — The z&is* dom that is from above is full of mere// and good fruits. And to this part of the description would I particularly call your attention — This world has been aptly compared to a school, a preparation for the next, in which our moral 88 powers are to be strengthened and exalted, our taste for true enjoyment formed, and directed to its proper objects, and habits of obedience, proceeding from the love of God, acquired and confirmed. No doubt the Almighty may, and perhaps sometimes does, by a sudden and irre- sistible act of power, deliver the sinner at once from the body of death, and renew a right spi- rit within him. — But the experience of the Church and the declarations of the Apostles authorise us in thinking, that such is not his usual process j — but that, as, in the natural world, he chooses to work by a concatenation of causes and gradual progress of exertion, up- holding, rather than controlling, the laws, which by his mighty word he at first establish- ed, so in the spiritual regeneration of an immor- tal soul, having originally formed man capable of being acted on by certain means and mo- tives, having willed, that man should be a par- taker in the work of his own salvation, — having furnished him abundantly with motives by the Revelation of the Gospel, — with means by the aid of the Holy Spirit,— having freed him from the captivity of sin, by the blood of Christ, who beholding the sufficiency of the motives, the means, the atonement, — declared, as he tri- umphed on the cross, that the salvation of man- kind was finished ; God, I say, having done every thing, which could be done for the salva- 89 tion of a creature, such as he has created man, — leaves him to the regular and gradual opera- tion of those means and motives, which he has supplied, and those laws of moral action, which he has established. Now for the perfection of our moral powers, the reformation of our taste, and the acquisi- tion of habits, action is absolutely requisite. — Mere innocence — mere abstinence from trans- gression, though it may prevent the encrease of sinful habits, can never totally eradicate their influence, or transform that taste, by which men are naturally prone to be lovers of plea- sure more than lovers of God. — Inaction can never perfect any of our moral powers, no more than the napkin which concealed the slothful servant's talent could add to its value. — By ac- tive love to mankind, by patient continuance in well doing, — by following that wisdom which is full of mercy and good fruits, alone can we hope to be assimilated to our leather, which is in heaven, who diffuses happiness throughout his wide creation, and while he is slow to an- ger, — is plenteous in mercy, and loving kind- ness. The Apostle concludes the description of heavenly wisdom, by its being without hypo- crisy j marking thereby the integrity of the 90 source, from whence the purity of heart, which it confers, and the fruitful benevolence, which it generates, must, and indeed can alone, pro- ceed. Party zeal must have no share in our good works. Our brotherly love must not be exclusive, confined to a particular sect, and re- gulated by our judgment of their opinions. — The innocency of our lives, the regularity of our conduct, the purity of our conversation, must proceed from a nobler source than the fear of disgracing our profession, or scanda- lizing our party. Men have been known, in all ages, to have made the greatest sacrifices to their passion for upholding some particular sect. — There is no form of false religion so absurd, as not to have had its votaries, who for the sake of supporting and casting a lustre upon it, would submit to privations, check their appe- tites, and conform their lives to its precepts. — But Christian wisdom knows no such motive.— He that is wise unto salvation, will be pure in heart, that he may see God,— will be merciful, —that he may obtain mercy ; — he will be kind- ly affectioned, and abounding in good works, that he may be conformed to the likeness of Him, who so loved mankind that he gave up his life for them, — of whom it is declared, that God is love,-— and of whose law love is the ful- filment. 91 Still less can hypocrisy contaminate the wis- dom that is from above.— They that wash their hand in innocency, not, that they may present themselves unpoluted at the altar of God, but, that they may be seen of men,— they that exercise their piety in public, and do their alms in the sight of the world that they may have glory of the same, and may be considered more pure, more pious, more virtuous, than they really are, — they have their reward,— they are to hope for no farther recompence. — And for what have they toiled? — An empty, fleeting bubble. — Too late will they find, that the wisdom of this world is foolishness, and its friendship enmity, with God. I have thus, my fellow Christians, examined the several parts of the description, which the Apostle has given us of the wisdom, which is the gift of the Holy Ghost, and shewed, I trust, how intimately connected they are with each other, and how indispensibly requisite, both for our present salvation from the misery and guilt and captivity of sin, and also for our future enjoyment of that exceeding weight of bliss and glory, which our mercifnl God has promised to them, who manifest their love to him, by keeping his commandments. I have now to remind you, that out of the 92 natural heart of man unenlightened, unmelio- rated, uninfluenced by the Holy Spirit,— no holy thought can arise, no good purpose can originate. — When, therefore, you feel in your minds an abhorrence of impurity, — a disposi- tion to gentleness and meekness, — a love of mercy, leading you to good works, — free from the contracting influence of party spirit, — un- dented by hypocrisy, — you are to consider it as the voice of God within you, — as the breathings of that spirit, which was promised, — not to the primitive church alone, — but also, to all the elect people of God, who were then afar off. — You are to give the glory, — not to yourselves,-— but to the Captain of your salvation, — through whose sufferings ye are made perfect.— Cau- tious not to grieve, — not to quench the Holy Spirit within you, — you are to cherish and en- courage the sacred influence, as the seal of your acceptance. You are to follow his guidance, with gratitude and awe, working out your own salvation with fear and trembling, for it is — God — which worketh in you, both to will and to do To whom, with the Father, and our ever blessed Redeemer, be glory now, and for ever. SERMON II Exodus, xxxiv. — 6. And the Lord passed before him, and proclaim- ed The Lord, The Lord God, merciful, and gracious, long suffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, keeping mercy for thou- sands, forgiving iniquity, transgression, and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty, vi- siting the iniquity of the Fathers upon the Children, unto the third and fourth genera- tion. AMONG the various enquiries, which have from time to time attracted the attention, and exercised the ingenuity of man, that concern- ing the nature of God has been one of the most general, as it assuredly is of the most in- teresting and important. In every stage of ci- vilization, in every state of society, even in 94 the hurry of active life, as well as in the se- clusion of philosophical retirement, mankind have ever made this their object, and have sought, some in the varying obscurities of tra- dition, some in the intricacies of metaphysical reasoning, others in the careful study of Reve- lation, for the description of the Deity, before whom they should fall down and worship. The prevalence of the interest on this sub- ject would almost lead us to recur to the belief of innate ideas to account for its generality, did not another and equally simple way of its explication offer itself. Though our ideas be not innate, our affections are. — As our faculties wait only for their proper materials whereon to exercise themselves, and even lead us to such, so our affections wait only for the proper objects for excitement, cause us to feel that there must be such, and induce us to seek them out.— And among the affections, with which God has created the human heart, that of veneration for some- thing superior to ourselves is one of the most prominent and powerful. Allied to fear, to grati- tude, to love, partaking of awe, it has influ- enced man, in all ages, to frame for it some object, according to his ability. The unen- lightened savage in the irregularities of nature, which he dreaded, in the harmony of the sea- sons, which blessed him with plenty, in every 95 thing, which, however trivial, was unaccount- able, — imagined he beheld the exertion of a superior power. And the philosopher, who found that the humblest part of nature was too wonderful for human wisdom, that to a perfect knowledge of it he could not attain, recog- nized in the incomprehensible sublimity of the universe, that there was a Power still more in- comprehensible and more sublime. — But, while we thus perceive, that nature, speaking with the voice of feeling, suggests to us the existence of an object for our reverence ; we should be aware that the description, which she supplies us with, is obscure and imperfect, totally in- commensurate with the unspeakable majesty of God, and leaving us almost to mere probable conjecture as to his Providence and attributes. Perhaps many, I had almost said all, of the errors of the heathen world may be traced up to the source of their not being satisfied with this im- perfect intimation of the Deity, but seeking to form more precise, more complicated ideas, of his nature, than their means of information authorized them.— Hence, he was by them clothed with created forms, with human weak- nesses, and human relations.— The eastern mo- narch represented him by a golden image. He, who had no gold, fell down before the stock of a tree. The polished Grecian worshipped the beautifully imagined grandeur of the olympian 96 Jove — And the superstitious savage bent before the dreadful deformity of some frightful idol. — Nor was the enlightened philosopher, who de- rided in secret those popular delusions, free from an exactly corresponding effect of the luxuriance of fancy. — He would not be satis- fied with the witness, which God had vouch- safed him, of his existence and goodness. He would not acknowledge, even to himself, his own ignorance in other respects. He would not exclaim, with the righteous Job, " Lo ! " these are parts of his ways. But how little a " portion is heard of him !" But giving the reins to his imagination in the midst of dark- ness, judging of the perfections of God from the analogy of man, wishing to include in his invention an answer to every enquiry, he form- ed a cunningly devised fable, as like to the Al- mighty as was the Indians idol, or the golden statue of Nebuchadnezzar. Different sects had their different inventions, all beginning with the gleam of truth, with which God had sup- plied them, and ending in the manifold absur- dity of human imagination ; and all furnishing a melancholy and convincing proof, that the world by wisdom could not know their God. But, how, you may ask, does all this con- cern us ? We are no longer in darkness. We have revelation. The glorious light of the Gos- 97 ♦ pel has risen upon us. The day spring from an high has visited us. God be praised, my fel- low Christians, it has. — And let us keep to it.— Let us not rely on metaphysical speculation for our faith. The Scriptures, undoubtedly, con- tain every thing, which is necessary for salva- tion. In them shall we find our exceeding great reward, even the word, which visited the Patriarchs, inspired the Prophets, and redeem- ed the world.— I am aware, that men of inge- nuity, who have been exercised in specula- tions on the human mind, have advanced de- monstrations of the existence of God, and by superadding infinity to what they consider as perfections in ourselves, have established, as they think, his various attributes, independent of the authority of Revelation. They have not in general erred much. — But, if they have not, it is because, they had the light of Revelation to point out to them what conclusions they should seek for ; and because, they did not venture to maintain any, which were obviously inconsistent with it — It has been said by some, that those demonstrations are of use as subsidiary supports for our faith.— Others have gone far- ther, and held, that they are its main ground- work, and that we must be convinced by hu- man reason of the existence, providence, and attributes, of God, before we can receive Scrip- ture as his Revelation. — But I will submit it to 98 any unprejudiced mind, whether a chain of rea- soning involving ideas totally beyond human conception, which compares the relations of different kinds of infinity, which abstracts from each other duration and succession, which de- termines concerning God from the analogy of man, whether such a chain of reasoning be more likely 4o carry conviction to the heart and understanding, than the plain historical and sensible proof, which God has actually vouch- safed us of the authenticity and authority of Scripture. The chain of historical evidence, from this time upwards to that of our Saviour, for the authenticity of the Scripture, consider- ed merely as a history, is stronger than the evi- dence for any human work whatsoever, more enquired into, more strongly attacked, more amply defended, more carefully preserved, more jealously watched. It is in short of such a nature, as to put us, as far as the degree of our assent is concerned, nearly into the situa- tion of persons, who actually behold the mira- cles, and heard the voice of Christ and his Apostles.— Imagine now an individual, who had never before considered the question re- specting the being of a God, but had merely that instinctive propensity, which is natural to man, to seek for some object ©f reverence and adoration. — Imagine such one, I say, behold- ing the miracles, the life, the death, the re- 99 surrection of our Saviour, witnessing the ful- filment of prophecy, the pouring forth of the Holy Spirit on his followers, the triumph of his doctrine over the wisdom, the passions, and the interests of the world. Imagine such a one receiving from him the Scriptures as the Revelation of God, hearing him declare, that there was a God, and that he had now mani- fested himself to mankind. Do you think, that the human heart is so formed, as that, except blinded by some powerful prejudice or passion, he could disbelieve the authority ? — Do you think, that he could suspend his assent, until some philosopher proved to him the being and Providence of God ? — No, my fellow Chris- tians, such is not the nature of human judg- ment. There is a mass of probable evidence, which can force our assent as strongly as the strictest demonstration, perhaps more strongly than any demonstration the terms of which we are not satisfied as to our perfectly understand- ing. And our decided assent, when once pro- duced, is equally influential in our lives and conduct, whatsoever may have been the source, from whence it may have originated. And in- deed, my fellow Christians, our Saviour seems by no means to have required any previous wis- dom in those to whom his Gospel should suc- cessfully be preached. " Except ye become as " little children," says he, " ye shall in no wise VOL, II. H 100 " enter into the kingdom of heaven."— And the Apostle declares, that other foundation should no man lay save Jesus Christ. Let us therefore, if we would be wise unto salvation, if we would form a true idea of the mighty One who inhabiteth eternity, not seek for it in the fancied strength of our intellect, but in the pure light of the Holy Scriptures, in which is revealed every thing, that is requisite for us to know. Let us not dare to explain away the descriptions therein contained, or to force them to an accommoda- tion to our own conceits. Let us, with an humble disposition of mind, search the Scrip- tures for the several features of character, which God has there given of himself, carefully recollecting, that to worship a God in any way differing from that, which is described in the Bible, is to set up an Idol in the place of Jeho- vah. We shall there find, that concerning his moral attributes, and his relations to man, there is much revealed, but concerning his nature, and his relations to the rest of the universe, scarce any thing. — He is described as being pleased with the obedience of his rational crea- tures, being pleased with faith, being of purer eyes than to behold iniquity, being influenced by man's moral conduct, one while provoked at his wickedness and repenting and grieving that he had made him, at another establishing a co- venant of mercy with those, who by faith and 101 obedience had found favour in his sight. Pro- claiming himself, sometimes in general terms of bounty and loving kindness to all mankind, mingled with unchanging justice, but much oftner, in particular descriptions of his mercies to the individuals, whom he addresses, as more likely to influence their love and obedience. He is represented as a God, who is about our path and about our bed, who not only regulates the general outline of human history, but also occasionally interferes in our most trivial con- cerns, having his ears ever open to the prayers, the sorrows, the repentance of his creatures. With respect to his relations to mankind, he is described as their Governor, their Redeemer, and their Sanctifier ; and in these several offices we find him represented as a distinct person. Here, it is objected to us by infidels, as a tri- umphant argumentum ad hominem, that this is inconsistent with the unity of God, so repeat- edly declared in our Scriptures. We are asked, how can three be one ? We answer, that we do not say, that three persons are one person, or that three Gods are one God, but that three Persons are one God. If they call on us to explain the manner, in which they are so, the nature of the union j we answer, that we know the fact, because it is revealed, but the manner of it— not being revealed, we do not know, having no means of knowing the nature h 2 102 of God, antecedent to, or beyond, revelation. There is no natural absurdity or inconsistence in three persons being one God ; nor until our adversaries can shew that there is, can they claim any farther answer. Others there are, who call themselves Christians, and profess to believe in revelation, but who would be wise above what is written. — These having devised for themselves a God, and discovered his attri- butes, by the strength of their own reason, imagine that the authority of Scripture is to be strengthened by proving that its descriptions of the Deity are agreeable to these their own in- ventions. To such, God manifested in the flesh, taking on him the form of a servant, making himself of no reputation, is a stumbling block and a rock of offence. The union of three persons in the Godhead, their perfect equality and coeternity, being beyond the power of their invention, they reject from the limits of their belief, and attempt to explain away, or perhaps to accommodate to their own doctrine, the most obvious authorities cf Scripture on these sub- jects. They seem not to be aware, that if reason could discover every thing, Scripture would be superfluous, and that the Bible has been given us for a very different purpose than merely to be a comment on our previous deduc- tions. Point out to these men the several texts in Scripture, in which the power, the majesty, the eternity of God, are ascribed to Christ, 103 and to the Holy Ghost; they will tell you, that it is mere figurative language, or that perhaps the passage may have been corrupted. When the Word of God is described by Moses as coin- ing unto Abraham, and declaring to him, that He was his exceeding great reward, and imme- diately after assuming the name of Jehovah ;-— when Saint John declares, that the Word, which was vvith God, and which was God, took upon him our nature, and dwelt among us ; — when our Saviour asserts, that Abraham saw his day and was glad, obviously referring to the above mentioned narration of Moses, in which it is afterwards added, that Abraham believed in the Lord, and it was counted to him for righteous- ness ; when Isaiah describes the Messiah as The Almighty Father, The everlasting God ; — when the Apostle tells us, that the Jews tempted Christ in the wilderness, which the Psalmist describes as tempting the most high God ; when the Apostle speaks of Christ as being over all God blessed for ever ; — when Saint John de- clares, that Jesus Christ is the true God and the eternal life ; — when Ezekiel describes the Lord God and the Spirit as being the same j — when Christ is said to have been begotten by the Holy Ghost, and therefore to be the Son of God ; — when lying unto the Holy Ghost and lying unto God are mentioned as one and the same thing when the inspiration of the Spirit is 104 mentioned as the inspiration of God ; — when the Father the Son and the Spirit are joined together, in different places of Scripture, with a varied order of enumeration ; — when the author of the Revelations describes the Lamb and the Spirit with all the characteristics and majesty of Everlasting Divinity ; — all these, and such like passages, are held to be figurative lan- guage, idiomatic forms, corrupt readings, any thing in short but the obvious and plain decla- ration, which they convey, of the distinct personality and undivided Godhead of the great Jehovah. — To such misconstruction, to such self produced blindness, to such absurdity, does the philosophy of this world force her de- luded victim, rejecting, in reality, while en. deavouring to accommodate the God of the Bible to the proportions of the Idol, which she has raised in the human intellect. Her pride cannot bear the humility of the carpenter's son. Her blindness cannot perceive the unspeakable glory of the redemption. She cannot bear God dwelling among men ; forgetful that the God of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob dwelt on the mercy seat between the Cherubims, talked with the Patriarchs, led their posterity out of Egypt, and guided them through the wilderness. Among the scriptural authorities for the Tri- nity I have not mentioned the form of expres- 105 sion in the first Chapter of Genesis, where a singular verb is joined to the plural noun sig- nifying God, because I would be slow in put- ing forward my own opinion in competition with that of some able divines, who seem to think it ought not much to be insisted on, as being possibly an idiomatic form of expression. — And yet I cannot help observing, that where we are told, " God said let us make man in our image " after our likeness," it must be a very strange idiom, which can account for the connection of the plural substantive " God" with a singular verb " said" in one part of the sentence, and a plural verb and plural pronoun immediately after. If Elohim be a singular noun having accidentally a plural termination, or if it be a plural noun used by custom in a singular sense, why is it joined with a plural verb and a plural pronoun here, and also in other places with plural verbs and even with plural adjectives ? — If this junction be, as has been said, only a royal form of speaking, why are plural verbs and plural pronouns never used when the Deity is expressed by his name Jehovah ? And besides, what authority have we for the existence of such a form of expression in the time of Moses ? It is never used by any of the kings of Israel. And the first instance we find of it is in the book of Esther. I must confess, that I cannot conceive a more plain and obvious intimation 106 of the plurality of persons and unity of God, than that afforded by the phraseology, used in this passage, and the several others, which de- scribe the conversations, which the Deity held with Abraham, Jacob, and Moses. Be assured* my fellow Christians, that if we would under- stand the Scriptures to our souls' advantage, if we would enter into the kingdom of heaven and know the things that be of God, we must approach them with the unprejudiced humility, the untaught simplicity of little children. — The precepts of the Gospel are not more hostile to the passions of the human heart, than its doc- trines are to the presumptuous pride of human wisdom, which is not satisfied, except it put forth its hand to the ark of God, and remove the vail from before the seat of mercy. — Be assured that every thing which is requisite for salvation is revealed, is clearly revealed, in the Scriptures. — Seek not to be wise above what is written. — We are told all that is necessary for us, the moral attributes of our God, his three-fold relation to us as Governor, Re- deemer and Sanctifier. — With the manner of the union, with his physical attributes, we are by no means concerned. We cannot comprehend them. — Such knowledge is too wonderful for us. —Pry not into it. Use no vain disputations of philosophy, falsely so called. And, above all things, use them not at the expence of Chris- 107 tian peace and Christian charity. — If your brother err in a matter, which is above human understanding, pity his folly for having at- tempted the enquiry ; pardon his weakness for having erred. — Pardon him, I say, for the sake of him who pardoned you, — for the sake of him who preserved you from similar presumption and similar mistake, — And may the God of all comfort strengthen you, stablish you. — May the Redeemer's blood wash out all your mis- deeds.. — May he that raised up Jesus from the dead, raise you also to sanctification in this life, and to glory in the next. Now to God the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, be glory now, and for ever. SERMON III Philippians, ii. — 6 and 7. Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God ; but made him- self of no reputation, and took upon himself the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men. AVE are assembled, my fellow Christians, to commemorate that wonderful instance of Di- vine love to mankind, by which the Word, which in the beginning was God, by whom all things were made, in whom was life and bght, came unto his own to proclaim the Gospel of life and immortality, and to give to as many as 109 should believe on him power to become the children of God. The Almighty had, by a series of prophecies, both verbally, and symbolically, declared unto mankind what he was about to do. The world, before the coming of the Redeemer was not left without hope that an atonement should in due time be made for them. They were not left without matter to exercise their faith in the promises of God, their trust in his mercy, and their gratitude for his love. Though the Jews were made the depositories of the oracles of God, the immediate hearers of his law, the ex- amples of his mercy to those that love him, yet the knowledge of the promises was not confined to them. Though separated from the world as a peculiar people, yet they were held up to it s curiosity and observation by the singularity of their system, and the miraculous nature of their history. A nation, numerous as the stars of heaven, though but a few generations from a single family, becoming thus numerous in a land, where they were always held in abomina- tion, and laterly treated as bond slaves, led out from that land by signs and wonders and the outstretched arm of the Almighty, passing dry through seas and rivers, subsisted in a barren wilderness for forty years, and afterwards driv- ing out from one of the strongest countries in no the world, a people more civilized, more war- like, of greater personal strength, and more numerous than themselves, such a nation must have been the object of universal interest and enquiry. The surrounding world would natu- rally ask what were their institutions, what their history, and what their religion ? Added to this, the circumstances of the people, whom they drove out before them, were peculiarly cal- culated to spread the result of these enquiries to the uttermost ends of the earth. Connected with, and in fact a tribe of, the Phenicians, who at that time exclusively possessed the na- vigation of the world, were highly commercial, enterprising, and roving, the Canaanites, who escaped the sword of the children of Israel, were likely to carry with them, to distant colo- nies, the history of their expulsion, and every thing therewith connected. After the lapse of a few centuries, when it is likely the memory of these transactions might have faded away, there was a second diffusion of the history of the chosen people by the cap- tivity. Their history now contained examples of the Almighty's vengeance on the third and fourth generations of them that hate him, as well as of his mercy on thousands of them that love him and keep his commandments. They brought with them the writings of their Pro- Ill phets, as well as their history, and their law, and some of these had their accomplishment in the captivity itself, affording thereby evidence of the Divine original of those which promised a Redeemer. They were held in captivity by a nation, who possessed the sway of the then civilized world. The ten tribes had been sent to its remotest extremities, and those of Judah and Benjamin dwelt in the neighbourhood of Babylon, which was at that time to be consi- dered as the capital of the whole earth. It is a remarkable circumstance, that the departure of the children of Israel out of Egypt, and the captivity of the ten tribes, divide into nearly equal periods the interval between the disper- sion of mankind at the confusion of languages, and the advent of our blessed Redeemer. That the knowledge of the Mosaic history, the Jewish law, and the promises in which the chosen people trusted, was by these means ge- nerally diffused would be highly probable, even had we no direct evidence on the subject. But we have the testimony of history both sacred profane, that it really was so. The sovereigns of the Assyrian empire had on different occasions enjoined the reverence of the God^of Israel to every people and nation and language. The mighty Cyrus had stopped amid the career of victory to recognize the people of the Lord, 112 to restore them to their country, to fulfill the pro- phecy, to execute the purpose for which he had been named by the Prophet Isaiah two hundred years before his birth the shepherd of Lord, the instrument to do his pleasure, that the world might know, from the rising of the sun, and from the West, that Jehovah was the Lord, and that beside him there was no other God. The Jew- ish nation had drawn the attention of the Gre- cian conquerors. Their Scriptures had been translated into the most generally diffused lan- guage of the world, a translation which is still in our hands. And a persuasion was prevalent throughout the whole East, that an extraordi- nary personage was to arise among the Jews, who was to exalt them to universal command. At length the fulness of time had arrived. As it had been before the flood, all flesh had corrupted their way. Though they knew God, they glorified him not as God, but held the truth in unrighteousness, changing it into a lie, and worshipping the creature more than the Cre- ator. Changing the glory of the incorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, sunk into the basest idolatry and all its concomitant vice and impurity, setting up as objects of adoration and consequently of res- pect and imitation, these lyeing representations 113 of the Deity, which they clothed, not in purity, and justice, and mercy, and love, but in sensuality, and violence, and rage, and revenge. Compare the character of the gods of ancient mythology j with that, which St. Paul has given of the repro- bate world, and remark the powerful effects which their speculative opinions concerning their gods had on their practice, and how closely the wor- shippers followed the imaginary example of those whom they adored, " filled with all unrighteous. " ness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, " maliciousness, full of envy, murder, debate, " deceit, malignity, despiteful, proud, boasters, " without natural affection, implacable, unmer- " ciful." Surely this, if ever, was the fullness of time, when the powers of darkness reigned thus uncontrolled in the world, when the enemy had come in thus like a flood, for the Spirit of the Lord to lift up an ensign against him, for the Redeemer to come to Israel. Human wisdom had been tried, had been fully tried, and tried in vain. Legislators had arisen. They had bound the weak, but could not restrain the strong. They had partially re- gulated external conduct, hut could not reach the heart. They had made submissive subjects, but could not make virtuous men. Philoso- phers had arisen, had declaimed on the beauty 114 of virtue. But unsanctioned speculations could never retain the violence of passion, could never regulate the impetuosity of the human heart, which is deceitful above all things and despe- rately wicked. Even the sage who harangued with enthusiasm, and the disciple who listened with admiration, so far from having an influ- ence on the rest of the world, sunk them- selves into its pollutions. At no previous time was philosophy so highly cultivated, were the laws so wisely framed, so powerfully sanctioned, so carefully administered, was civilization so widely diffused j in short, at no previous time had the insufficiency of unassisted man, to free the world from the thraldom of sin, been so completely evinced. Surely this was the fulness of time. And as the abandoned and impotent state of man required then, more than ever, the salva- tion of a Redeemer, the aid of the Holy Spirit, the promulgation of the law of God ; so did the circumstances of the world at that time render the diffusion of the knowledge of that Saviour, of that Spirit, of that law, more easy, and more rapidly general. Civilization had reached one of these its limits, at which when it arrives, it again recedes. The intercourse of Rome or her dependencies extended over the whole of the inhabited world ; as her empire 115 did over the whole of the civilized. A spirit of philosophical enquiry, and a readiness and ability to canvass any high pretending claims, were prevalent. It has been asked, why did our Saviour appear at the particular time he did ? — We answer, that as the purpose of his coming was to make atonement for the sins of the whole world, as well those which were antecedent, as those which were subsequent to his sacrifice, it mattered not, in this respect, at what time he came. But as faith in the promises and prophecies which foretold him was requisite before his coming, the fulness of time for him to come was before the grounds of that faith, humanly speaking, would have been too much weakened by an excessive inter- val of time ; when the vices of the world were at their height ; and the self-sufficiency of man had been weighed in the balance and found wanting. And as faith, and knowledge, and Jove, and obedience to the Redeemer, were necessary after his coming, the fulness of time was that, when the Gospel could be most widely and rapidly diffused, its evidence best examined into, and most perfectly established. And as it was the fulness of time, so was it also the period pointed to by a succession of prophecies. The scepter had not yet departed from Judah, nor a law-giver from between his VOL. II. I 116 feet. The legislative authority existed in the Sanhedrim, and the scepter was held by the family of Antipas ; who, if we may credit the earliest author who has spoken of him, was of Jewish extraction, and confessedly was of the Jewish religion, until, after the condemnation of Archelaus, Judea was declared a Roman province, shortly after the birth of Christ. The seventy weeks were now completed, which Daniel had declared were determined on the people, on the holy city, to finish the trans- gression, to make reconciliation for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy One. This period was now completed ac- cording to the explication of the Jews of that day, who professed that they then expected their Messiah ; according to the explication of those who preceded them, from whose report the same opinion prevailed throughout the whole East ; and according even to the explica- tion of many of the Jews since that time, who assert, that in consequence of the sins of the nation, God changed his purpose, and delayed the redemption. The limitation of time prevents me from now pointing out to you fully the exact coincidence between the character of our Saviour, and the 117 predicted character of the Messiah. I shall only remind you, that he was born in Bethle- hem, born of a Virgin of the house of David, as foretold by [saiah, that he was unwittingly and contemptuously called by the Jews a Na- zarene, a word, which signifies preserver, and is, in Exodus, applied to the Deity, and in Isaiah, to that plant, which was to arise from, and preserve the stem of Jesse. I must however direct your attention to the humility, with which he, through whom the universe was created, clothed himself, when he came to his own ; an humility, which was a rock of offence to the Jews, concealing from their carnal and proud minds, that real gran- deur, that dignity of righteousness, which they ought to have looked for in the promised Shiloh, in him to whom the scepter belonged, in him who was the Son, who was the messenger of Je- hovah, who was the bearer of reconciliation ; for in all these meanings has the word Shiloh been interpreted, and all of them are equally applicable to Jesus of Nazareth. He who was in the form of God, who is before the Patri- archs were, took upon him the form of a ser- vant, was born among the lowest of the people, and under the most distressful circumstances of poverty. Laid in a manger, under the open air, immediately after his birth, and shortly after i 2 118 hurried from his humble home to avoid the per- secution of a tyrant, and thrown on the com- passion of strangers for concealment and sub- sistence. He made himself of no reputation. Though the beasts of the field have dens, yet had not the Son of Man where to lay his head. He preached the Gospel to the poor, whom the Jewish doctors despised, impiously asserting, that on such, the inspiration of God could never rest. He associated with publicans and sin- ners, he performed the most menial office for his disciples, so as to alarm the pride, which they felt for their master. He sub- mitted himself to death, to a death, which in its preparation, its manner, and its kind, was attended with every circumstance of indig- nity and infamy. And to make these instances of humility the more striking, they are uniformly accompanied by assertions or in- dications of royalty and divinity. When we are told, that he was born in an humble rank, his descent is traced to the kings of Judah. Was he born in the midst of poverty, the hea- venly host hailed the advent of peace to man- kind and glory to God. Were his family forced to fly their country, it was in consequence of the adoration of the wise men of the east. Did he wander in the wilderness, he was there de- clared to be the beloved Son, in whom the Al- mighty was well pleased. When he preached 119 the Gospel to the poor, he did it as one having authority. When he associated with Publicans, he professed himself the Saviour of sinners. When he washed his disciples feet, he declared himself their master. When he submitted him- self to the death of the cross, he asserted his royal title, his power over the heavenly host, and promised to the penitent malefactor, par- don and salvation. Nor is it only by his exam- ple he recommends to his followers humility. " Blessed are the meek. Blessed are the poor " in spirit. Blessed are they who submit to " reviling and persecution and injustice." Such are the precepts of our meek and humble Re- deemer. Oh ! my fellow Christians, how invaluable is this example, how invaluable are these pre- cepts, how entirely indispensable to the Chris- tian is the virtue of humility ! " Except ye " become as little children, ye shall in no wise " enter into the kingdom of God." Pride, from whatsoever source it seems to take its rise, under whatsoever form it offers itself, not only debases the human heart, and unfits it for the social virtues, but also hardens it against the voice of the Almighty, and fills it with rebel- lion and disobedience. Can the proud man, be his pride of whatsoever sort it may, ever be taught to feel, that he is of himself a lost and 120 wretched creature, that of himself he can nei- ther have faith, nor hope, nor patience, nor charity, nor any thing that is good ; that, such is his miserable state, that the very circum- stance on which he grounds his pride is but as a straw in the balance, as some trifling orna- ment on a criminal who is dragging to execu- tion ? And while pride thus shuts his eyes to his own wretchedness and insufficiency, will he, or can he, seek for aid, where alone aid is to be found ? Will he, or can he, submit himself, his will, his reason, his affections, to the guid- ance of the Holy Spirit, to the government of that God, by whom every one that exalteth himself is abased, who chasteneth every son whom he receiveth, to whom obedience is more grateful than sacrifice ? To this government of the heart and conduct, this reign of the Holy Spirit within us, this kingdom of God, in which there is peace beyond all understanding, and pleasures for evermore, the proud man must always be a stranger. Will he who is proud of his riches, cease to care for the things of this world, to be anxious for the morrow, to lay up his treasure on earth, and his heart there also ? Will he attend to that religion, which declares that he cannot serve God and mammon, which denounces the moral impossibility of a man, who trusteth in his riches, entering into life ? Will he, who is proud of his rank or family, 121 forego his ambition ? Will he hearken to a system, which teaches us to condescend to men of low estate ? A system preached by the poor, and to the poor, and to which not many rulers, not many noble, not many great men, have listened ? Will he, who is proud of superior intellect, or mental acquirements, submit to be apparently instructed by men of humbler ta- lents than himself ? Will he give his assent to what he can see but as through a glass darkly ? A religion containing mysteries, which he can- not comprehend, teaching with authority rather than persuasion, given to the world by unlet- tered fishermen, and totally unconnected with human philosophy ? But above all species of pride, the pride of a fancied superior holiness, is most inconsistent with the kingdom of God. Will he, who thinks himself whole, seek for a physician ? Confident that he stands secure, that he is not as other men are, he will be ever more ready to censure others, than to judge himself j more ready to expose and condemn the speculative errors of others, than to feel, to confess, to rectify, his own errors in practice. It is easier to concern ourselves with the spiritual state of others, than to examine with fear and trembling into our own. It is easier to persuade our- selves, that others shall be excluded from the 122 strait gate, than to labour, that we ourselves may enter therein. It is easier to be leaders of a sect, to fancy ourselves the lights of the world, than to do justice, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with our God. Be not deceived, my fellow Christians, the exclusion of others is not our own salvation. Love of God, faith in our Redeemer, obedi- ence to the Holy Spirit, are not comparative, but absolute qualities. The question at the great day will not be, whether we have loved God more than others have, but whether our love has regulated the conversation of our lives. Not whether we have had faith more than others, but whether we have had faith unto obedience. Not whether we less than others have grieved the Holy Spirit, but whether we have surrendered ourselves wholly to his guid- ance. Let therefore this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus, who, being in the form of God, did not assume to himself honors equal to that exalted nature, but divested himself of his glory, taking the form of a servant, and be- ing made in the likeness of men. To whom, with the Father, and the Holy Spirit, be glory now, and for ever. SERMON IV. I. Corinthians, xv.— -14. And if Christ be not risen, then is our preach- ing vain, and your faith also vain. Among the many speculative enquiries, which have arisen on religious subjects, that concerning the intention, with which the Chris- tian dispensation was given to mankind, is perhaps one of the most important.— Not, that having a perfect knowledge thereof is neces- sary to salvation, nor yet, that entertaining a right opinion thereon is immediately connected with moral practice, but, that error on this might lead to error on points, which are es- sential, — might blind our understandings to the Gospel of our salvation, and paralise our obe- dience to the teaching which is of God. — Some 124 have maintained, that the design of the Chris- tian revelation was to supply to mankind a more perfect system of morals. Others, that it was to superadd a perfect sanction to that morality, which was already discoverable by human rea- son. — Others again have held, that to make atonement for sin, and to reconcile the justice and mercy of God, Avas the exclusive object of the divine counsel. — I shall not at present enter on the consideration of these several opi- nions, their relative merits, their grounds, and consequences. — They are each of them singly incomplete. That is, they are far less perfect, than the Scripture itself authorises. — That God sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins ; and not for ours only, but for those of the whole world ; — that Christ gave his life for the life of the world, — a ransom for many ; — that he came to purify to himself a people zealous of good works j — that he has given to us the new commandment of loving one another \ — that he has brought to light life and immortality ; that he has called us to a faith, which is unto obedience,— a faith gounded on better hopes, and surer promises j are the express declarations of the Holy Scripture. — With these declara- tions we should content ourselves, and cau- tiously avoid all speculations, which may be in- consistent with them.— It is not for us to con- jecture what were the counsels of God j it is 125 dangerous, nay impious, to appeal to the tri- bunal of human reason for what they ought to have been. — And yet, some, and these men of no humble name in religious controversy, have grounded their respective systems on the supposed determination of what were the coun- sels, the designs, the purposes of God, in his government of mankind, — and seem to think, that they render an invaluable service to the cause of religion, by shewing the conformity of revelation with the consequences of these principles ; and, that they thereby add to the evidence of our faith, and bring it more near the confines of abstract certainty. — This method may be useful j— but it may also be dangerous. — And, it is most worthy of remark, that neither our Redeemer himself, nor even his Apostles, ever resorted to such means, for establishing the religion, which they proclaimed to mankind. — They appealed, not to ratiocination, but to the witness of God. — They did not attempt to prove the reasonableness of the Gospel ; but they confirmed it by miracle, and the fulfil- ment of prophecy. — " Go," said Christ to the messengers of John, " and tell him what ye have " seen. — The blind receive their sight, and the " lame walk. The lepers are cleansed, and the " deaf hear. The dead are raised up, and the " poor have the Gospel preached to them.'* — This my fellow Christians, is the appropriate, 126 the genuine, the original, the only scriptural evidence of our religion. — Our Saviour's entire ministry was one continued argument of this description.— The preaching of his Apostles never referred to any other. It is briefly com- prehended and represented in the passage I have chosen for my text.—-" If Christ be not " risen, then is our preaching vain, and your " hope also is vain." The author had been endeavouring to impress on his Corinthian converts the tenet of the re- surection of the dead, and to guard them against error on that momentous subject. — Though well acquainted with the philosophy of the day, and though addressing a people, to whom such wisdom was familiar, he enters into no abstract reasoning from the natural immortality of the soul ; nor does he yet resort to the considera- tion of the attributes of God ; to infer from thence the necessity of a future state, to vin- dicate the wisdom and justice of Providence in the present. No, he rests his conclusion on the authority of the Gospel founded on the simple evidence of miracle. — If Christ be risen, then is our preaching true, and your hope well founded. — If he be not, then is our preaching vain, and your faith also is vain. But, perhaps, it may be thought, that how' 127 ever well adapted this evidence might have been to the age of the Apostles, it has now ceased to be sufficient ; miraculous powers have long since been suspended in the church, and the in- tervention of many centuries may have obscured and weakened the testimony for the facts re- corded by the Evangelists. — It may be thought, that the miracles themselves have need of be- ing substantiated by shewing the consonance of the religion, which they were meant to support, to that, which reason would point out to us ought to be of God. — Suffer me, therefore, to call your attention to the consideration of the evidence for the miraculous facts of Gospel his- tory, and to estimate what its real value at pre- sent is. — And, I trust, you will find, that it is now as it was at first ; — that the resurrection of Christ is the best, the surest, and the safest, reason we can give of the hope, which is in us. Let us go back from the present, and trace, gradually, the chain of testimony ; that we may compare the probability, which is offered to us, with that which was presented to the first hearers of Christianity.— There are at pre- sent, and have been nearly since the introduc- tion of printing, an almost countless number of copies of the Holy Scriptures dispersed over the world in various languages. — All of them conspire in bearing testimony, that the Sacred 128 Text has been preserved uncorrupted during that period. Our assurance, that there has been no forgery during the last 400 years, is as great as our assurance of any matter of fact whatsoever not coming immediately under the observation of our own senses. — Nay, I might have spared the exception, for, where proba- bility approaches so near to certainty, then, though the abstract difference still exists, yet the assurance, the persuasion generated in the mind, is as great by the one as by the other. — Whatever was the weight of Scripture testi- mony 400 years ago, it is precisely the same at present. The intervening time has not sub- tracted a particle from its value. — Let us now go back to the period preceding this era, and beginning from those who heard the Apostles ; and consider what is the value of the evidence, that there was no alteration during that time. — It is recorded by Eusebius, who wrote about 200 years after the transaction, and who col- lected his information, not only from preceding writers, but also from general tradition, — that Quadratus, and other preachers of Christianity, who lived immediately after the first publica- tion of our Scriptures, were in the practice of distributing copies of them among their con- verts. It appears, that this practice was con- tinued, and was also universal ; for, in the per- secution by Galerius, every apostate Christian 129 was required to surrender his Bible, as the symbol of his recantation : — so that it must have been a generally known fact, that every Christian family was possessed of one. — These, who surrendered them, were but few ; and shortly after, Christianity having became the profession of the Empire, copies of the Scrip- tures were of course immensely multiplied. The nature of the material, on which these copies were written, and the religious care, which was bestowed on them, were such as to render them peculiarly lasting.— An individual manu- script might, and probably often did, last for nearly 1000 years. We have at present one complete copy of the Bible, I mean the Alex- andrian, which was made at least in the fifth century, and perhaps much earlier. We have also part of another little less ancient. — This durability, while it aided the multiplication of copies by obviating a corresponding diminution, —supplied also an insurmountable check to the corruption of the Scriptures. — From the time of Quadratus to that of the irruption of the bar- barians, every Christian family possessed a Bi- ble. — Many of these were the copies, which had been distributed by the immediate successors of the Apostles.— From thence to the invention of printing, Bibles, though no longer as numer- ous as Christian families, were at least as nu- 130 merous as the churches, convents, and othei religious houses ; that is, many tens of thou- sands. — The Scriptures could not be corrupted, because, they were universally in the hands of the people.— They could not be corrupted, be- cause, the manuscripts of the first age reached nearly through the entire period, of which I speak. I choose rather to insist on these con- siderations, than on the circumstance of the ri- val sects mutually watching each other, be- cause, I think them incomparably stronger. — Are they not the testimony of all men in all ages, during the period, to which I allude, that the Scriptures were not corrupted ? — And, if so, can we have a doubt, that our present Scrip- tures are the same as those of the first age of Christianity ? — That they contain the history, and preaching of the Apostles ? And are we not, as to assurance that they do so, precisely in the same situation with those who were their actual hearers ? Now, my fellow Christians, let us consider, what kind of evidence was offered to the hearers of the Apostles and their immediate succes- sors ; for precisely the same kind and degree of evidence is, by this unquestionable preservation of the integrity of the New Testament, also of- fered to us. — A number of persons, who stated themselves to have been actual witnesses of what 131 they related, declared to the world, that Jesus Christ, after having been crucified, and evi- dently dead, again returned to life, remained on earth for many days, and then ascended into heaven. They delivered, at the same time, to the world, a written account of this transaction, which was forthwith dispersed among all the Christian converts. — Now, what is the value of this written account ? Is it to be considered as the testimony only of its four authors ? By no means. — It is the testimony of every Jewish convert, who received it. — It is the testimony of the five hundred brethren, who beheld our Lord immediately after his resurrection. — It is the testimony of them, with whom he con- versed during the interval between his resurrec- tion and assension. It is the testimony of all those who witnessed his assension. — It is the dying declaration of every Jewish martyr, who perished in the first age of Christianity. — Every one of them, by receiving this written account, sanctioned it as his own. — The Evangelists were, if I may use the expression, merely the secretaries of this immense body ; — every one of whom would have written the same, had occasion called for it ;-— every one of whom at- tested the sincerity, with which he joined in its publication, by the sacrifice of all which human weakness holds dear ; and many of whom finally sealed it with their blood. — But here, VOL. II. K 132 perhaps, some objector may ask, why did not all the Jews submit to such a weight of evidence ? — Precisely for the same reason, my fellow Christians, that the Egyptians did not acknow- ledge and obey the divine authority of Moses. —We know, from history, that a belief of ma- gical powers was universally prevalent among the Jews at the time. — Though they admitted, that the event was supernatural, it did not therefore necessarily follow, in their minds, that it was divine. — And, my fellow Christians, it may not be useless to remark, that if we, from whose minds a more advanced state of science, a more enlightened philosophy, has removed these absurd delusions, if we are weak in our faith, if we hesitate in our belief, we have less to plead in palliation of our hardness of heart than they had. But another objector, in the garb of fancied wisdom, may profess,— that it is harder to be- lieve the miracle than to disbelieve the testi- mony j — it being more consonant to experience, that testimony should be false, than that mira- cle should happen.— This objection, you all know, has been ably and fully answered— by a learned Prelate of our Church. I shall there- fore not delay on it, farther than to remark, that to the resurrection this general assertion, even if admitted, would not apply ; — for the 13.3 testimony for the resurrection is such, as has never before, nor never since, been offered for any other fact ; — and there is, therefore, no opportunity for experience to compare the fre- quency, or infrequency, of its truth, with that of the event, which it is brought to establish. — No other testimony has been so carefully, so multifariously, so unquestionably, transmitted to us. — Of no other testimony have the wit- nesses been so numerous, so incapable of being deceived themselves, or of wishing to deceive others. — No other testimony has been supported by the same sacrifices.— Take any circumstance however familiar to our belief, to which we most strongly and implicitly assent; — suppose any historical fact of even the preceding age ; — have we any such overpowering testimony for it? — By what such sacrifices have its evidences been supported ? — Over what such affections of human nature, over what such opposition, such investigation of adversaries, has it triumphed ? — By what such integrity, such sincerity, such numbers, has it been confirmed ? Here, my fellow Christians, let me entreat you to consider, how it becomes us to act, who are " encompassed by such a cloud of wit- " nesses." Jesus Christ, who was crucified, dead, and buried, who rose again from the dead, and ascended into heaven, as surely, as k 2 134 any fact, for which we have not the actual evin dence of our senses ; — he has declared, by his Apostle, that he died for our sins, and rose again for our justification. — Shall we not gratefully avail ourselves of the offered mercy ? — Shall we not lay hold on the salvation, which is set before us ? Shall we hesitate, because we cannot explain, why a vicarious sacrifice should be accepted ? — He has declared to us a God, and that " God is love shall we suspend our understandings, and restrain our hearts, until we can confirm his testimony, until we can in- vestigate, and ascertain, the attributes of that Almighty Being, by the slowness, and obscu- rity, of ratiocination? — He has declared, that he is one with the Father ; shall we hesitate, because, we cannot reconcile it to the imagi- nary grandeur of the Idol of philosophical ab- straction ?— Shall we presumptuously ask, is not this the Carpenter's son ? — He has promised us, that he will give the Holy Spirit to those who ask him, — that he will send us another Com- forter, who shall abide with us for ever j shall we discredit, or explain away these promises ? Shall we neglect, shall we quench the Spirit, because, we cannot comprehend its influence, because, we know not how it cometh, or whither it goeth ? — He has called us to a faith, which is unto obedience, a faith, which worketh by love ; — he has declared, that, without holiness, no 135 man shall see the Lord ; he has called on us, to work out our own salvation, with fear and trembling, while it is God, which worketh in us, both to will, and to do ; — shall we be slow in our obedience, through the vain conceit, that the necessity of our cooperation would lessen the sufficiency of an all perfect sacrifice ? No, my fellow Christians, let us rather walk humbly with our God, do righteously, and love mercy. — The ark of the Christian covenant refuses the presumptuous hand of human weakness to unveil its mysteries, or to support its progress. — Inconceivableness, being above the ken of human reason, or the reach of human discovery, can be no objection to any revelation or doc- trine, delivered by him, who rose from the dead, and ascended into heaven. — Let me now ask you, my fellow Christians if you yourselves knew of any person, that he had performed such mira- cles as our Saviour did, that he had declared himself God, and confirmed that declaration by rising from the dead and ascending into heaven, would you not believe him ? Would you not obey him ?-— And yet, you could not, by any means, know it more surely than you may know, if you consider the evidences, that Jesus of Nazareth has done so. — Do you then indeed believe in him ?— If you do, you must love him ; for love is the natural offspring of that gratitude and admiration, which must re- 136 suit from such a faith- — If you love him, you must obe) him ; for obedience is, at once, the consequence, and the criteiion, of affection. — Do you indeed believe ? — Can you lay your anxieties, your pride, your resentments, at the feet of your Redeemer ? — Can you do good for evil ? — Can your forgive those who have injured you, with that full, that affectionate pardon, which you wish yourselves to receive from your God ? — Or, will you delay, until you can satisfy yourselves of the civil expediency of these com- mands ?— Expedient, or inexpedient, they are the commands of Christ. — Probable, or impro- bable, the promises of the Gospel are the pro- mises of Christ. — If he be not risen, then is our preaching vain, and your faith also is vain. — But if he be, those promises are of the greatest certainty, — those commands of the utmost im- portance. — If he be, life and immortality are the gift of God -death, eternal death, is the wages of transgression. SERMON V. Luke, i. — 78 and 79. Through the tender mercy of our God, whereby the day spring from on high hath visited us, to give light to them that sit in darkness and in the shadow of death, to guide our feet into the way of peace. WE have here, my fellow Christians, a de- claration uttered by an individual, whom the sacred historian states to have been under the immediate influence of inspiration, to have been filled with the Holy Ghost. — Jt proclaims the source, the manner, and the object of the Gos- pel, and therefore, both from the importance of its subject, and the authority of its convey- ance, demands our most serious consideration. — It is not the proposal of some curious ques- 138 tion, which may minister strife, it is not the decision of some minor point of metaphysical theology, collected by ratiocination from some obscure allusion, it is the voice of God speak- ing by the instrumentality of the Prophet, and declaring to us the source, and object, of our highest hopes, — and the manner of our salva. tion. It declares, that the source from whence the dayspring from on high has visited us is the tender mercy of our God. — It pronounces, that the mode of its efficacy is by the illumina- tion of our minds. It describes the previous state of those, who were thus mercifully en- lightened, to have been a state of most pe- rilous darkness. It describes them, sitting, as it were, under the very shadow of impending destruction. It proclaims, the great object of this merciful visitation to have been to extri- cate them out of this awful ruin, and to guide their feet in the paths of safety and of peace.— Suffer me, my fellow Christians, to call your attention, your most earnest attention, to the several parts of these glad tidings of exceeding joy, this glorious Gospel of our salvation. There are, perhaps, few more distinguishing features of the religion of the Bible, than the character, under which it presents the God of nature to the adoration of mankind, namely, as a God of mercy. — The superstition of the 139 savage seeks its Deity in the destructive blnze of the lightening, or the devastation of the whirlwind, and bows, with abject fear, amid the ruins of convulsed nature, before an ima- ginary, malevolent, and vengeful being. — The mythology of the Poets, while it clothed the Gods of civilized antiquity with the passions, and even the weaknesses, of human nature, passed by the neglected attribute of mercy, in its fiction of divinity.— »By the Philosopher it was proudly rejected from the grandeur of his invented God. — To a being eternal, and in- finitely present, supremely happy, and su- premely wise, mercy seemed too humble a qua- lity to add aught, either of enjoyment, or of dignity. — The Gods of the Epicureans were careless of mankind. The Deity of the Stoics exerted only his prudence in the govern- ment of human affairs. — The world by wisdom knew not God.— The natural man receiveth not the things which be of God. — It was reserved for the incarnate Word, by the mouths of his Pro- phets and Apostles, to proclaim to mankind, that God is Love, and that his mercy is over all his works. — This neglected attribute, which, by some unaccountable blindness, the savage had not collected from the bounty displayed in the universe, which the Poet had omitted to transfer from our own to a superior nature, — to the glory and the enjoyment of which the 140 Philosopher had been insensible, this neglected attribute stands formost in the title of the Chris- tian's God ; — that God, who proclaimed him- self, as he passed before Moses, The Lord, The Lord God, merciful and gracious. — It is no sub- ordinate or adventitious quality, it is the cha- racter, by which the Almighty chooses to be known by mankind, — eclipsing by a superior glory the other perfections of his nature. — It is not to the infinite wisdom, the Almighty power, the incomprehensible existence, of Jehovah, that mankind owe their pardon and salvation, but to the tender mercy of our God, whereby the dayspring from on high hath visited us. Yes, my fellow Christians, vain would be the attempt to demonstrate any necessary con- nection between the wisdom, the omnipotence, the infinity of God, and the pardon of man- kind. — Justly has the Psalmist exclaimed, ** Lord, what is man, that thou so regardest " him, or the children of men, that thou visit- " est them !" — Reason can see no cause, why, among the countless systems, which circulate in the vast expanse of space, and have been, and shall be for ages innumerable, the wisdom and power of the Creator could not find ample and enduring opportunities for their exertion ; why the Almighty should deem the glorious display of his infinite perfections to the innu- 141 merable company of angels, which, day without night, circle his throne rejoicing, — why he should deem such display insufficient,— except he visited this world of ours, — this speck in the boundless ocean of being, and dwelt among the sons of men. — But, what reason could not discern, what the intellectual pride of man, seeking to comprehend the incomprehensible God, would reject, nay even in many, who trusted in their own strength, has rejected, — that has revelation clearly and fully declared to us. — Great, without doubt, is this mystery of divinity.— Worthy of the admiration of men and angels is that attribute of mercy, which led the son of God to leave that glory, which he had before the world began, and to manifest himself to mankind in the flesh. The next particular in these glorious tidings of the mercy of God, which demands our at- tention, is the description of the mode of its efficacy, that it is meant to operate by the illu- mination of our minds, — that the dayspring from on high has visited us to give light to the objects of redeeming Love. — It is not by any violent and resistless abstraction of the causes of temptation, it is not by any overpowering coercion of our faculties and actions, that the gracious work of our renovation is effected, that we are vindicated from the bondage of sin 142 into the glorious liberty of the children of God. — As the Apostle declares, that darkness of un- derstanding, and blindness of heart, had alien- ated mankind from the life, which was pleasing in the sight of God,— so the Gospel, which we are here concerned with, proclaims, that the removal of that darkness was to be the remedy for that alienation. — Had the change been pro- duced by coercion, the moral character, where- by, alone, obedience can be pleasing, namely, its being voluntary, would have been impossi- ble.— As sin had originated in a voluntary dis- obedience ; so by a voluntary obedience must salvation from sin be effected. — Had the change been produced by an alteration of our physical and moral state of being, by transfering us to an higher order in the scale of creation, — it would no longer be man, but a different class of existences, which would have been redeemed ; — the usual order, which we observe in the works of Providence, would have been departed from, which works by gradual, not sudden transitions, — and which would indicate, that the merciful design of our Creator was, first, to save us from sin, such as tve are, and, afterwards, to exalt us to a more glorious state of being.— For this purpose, to enlighten the minds of mankind, to present to them a knowledge of the merciful designs of Providence in their favour, and thereby to awaken their gratitude, 143 to supply them with that wisdom, which is from above, and which, influencing our strongest and best affections, can dedicate them to the service of God, and regulate the whole conver- sation of our lives, is obviously a most appro- priate and certain means of operation. — If we are told, and believe, that we are, and have been from eternity, objects of the love of our heavenly Father, — if we are told, and believe, that he has given his son, that that son has given himself, to make atonement for our sins, if we are told, and believe that he has pro- mised his Holy Spirit to them that ask in faith, that that Spirit is ever ready to sustain our infirmities, to aid our insufficiency, — to be the author and perfector of our faith, the source of holy desires, good counsels, and just works, — if, I say, we are told, and believe, all this, will we not naturally, I had almost said necessarily, love in return that Father, Son, and Spirit, devote ourselves, our souls, and bodies, to the service of our God, bow at the throne of his mercy, and become willing in the day of his power ? — Where then is the domi- nion of sin ?— Is not our captivity led captive ? Where are the alurements of the world ! — Shall we not by faith overcome the world ? — Shall not the love of God shed abroad into our hearts triumph over every earthly affection ? — Shall we not go on from strength to strength, until we 144 arrive at the fulness of the stature of the sons of God ? And, my fellow Christians, what a contrast is this to our former state ! — When that day- spring from on high first visited ns, we sat in darkness. — When that Spirit first descended, he moved, as at the material creation, on the face of a void and formless abyss — We sat in dark- ness,- -under the very shadow of impending destruction. — The very ruin, which every instant threatened by its fall to crush the human race in everlasting death, shut out from their view the light of heaven, by which alone they could not know their danger, or hope for pre- servation. But, my fellow Christians, let us carefully consider, whether this description belongs ex- sively and solely to the state of mankind in general at the advent of our blessed Lord. — Let us well consider, whether it be not equally applicable to every individual, who has not yet received into his heart the knowledge of the Gospel of Christ, — who has not yet submitted his affections to the guidance of the Holy Spirit. — Without these sure testimonies of the Lord which give light unto the simple, and rejoice the heart, without those right statutes, those true judgments, which convert the soul, care- 145 less, because ignorant, — hardened, because in- sensible, he sits in blind security, and in the midst of ruin dwells in Egyptian darkness. Such was the state of every one of us, before our hearts were turned towards the Gospel of Christ. — Such may be the case with many of us yet. — Many of us may have hitherto closed our ears against the voice of the Saviour, and shut our hearts against the intrusion of the Holy Spirit.— God grant there may be none such among my present audience. — But if there be, let me entreat them, as they value the prospects of a boundless futurity, which lies before them, — to suffer themselves to be roused from their lethargic delusion, their procrastinating apathy, to fly from the haunts of sinners, to rise from the seat of the scornful, to meditate on the law of their God, by night, and by day, — to read their Bibles, diligently, carefully, humbly, to read them, to lay hold on the hope, which is therein set before them, the salvation, which is therein offered to them. — The sun of righteousnes has risen with healing on his wings, let them open their eyes to that glorious light, it will guide their feet into to paths of safety and of peace. But, will the mere perusal of the Scriptures, the mere attending to the Gospel, effect all this ?— Assuredly the reception of it will j for 146 it is the power of God unto salvation j — it is the history of God's inconceivable mercies towards fallen man ; it is the history of the solicitude of a tender parent for his mindstruck child ; and the first exertion of returning sa- nity shall be grateful affection, the next hum- ble obedience. — The bonds of Christian duty are the bonds of love, its cords are these of a man. — From the reception of the Gospel, does this heavenly principle of Love to God originate; from the belief of the Gospel, does it gather strength ; by the persuasion, the con- viction, of the Gospel's truth, is it rendered perfect ; so as to cast out all suspicion, and to triumph over every other motive of the human system It is this, from which, neither tribu- lation, nor anguish, nor famine, nor the sword, nor hope of worldly good, nor fear of worldly evil, can separate the believer's heart. It is this, which, in all ages of the history of God's people has produced the most glorious instances of benevolent exertion, and disinterested self denial. — It has changed the human heart from stone to flesh. — It has eradicated every sinful passion, and cherished every charity of our nature. And, what it has done for others, it is equally powerful to effect in us. — To us, it may be as a pole star amid the waves of a tem- pestuous ocean, — a brazen serpent in the wil- derness of our mortal pilgrimage, on which, 147 the wounded soul may look and live. — It may, in this world, lead us through ways of peace, and paths of pleasantness, — and, in that which is to come, present us at the throne of our Redeemer's glory, clothed in his righteousness, — in righteousnes, which is his gift, because, it has proceeded from that love, which his spirit has shed abroad into our hearts. Yes, my fellow Christians, he, that came to be the glory of his people, and to be a light to lighten the nations, — came, as the inspired Zacharias has declared, to guide our feet into the way of peace — Peaceful are the Christian's ways ; for the grand obstacle to peace is re- moved. — Sin, with all its cancerous roots, which disease and render man a living mass of ago- nized corruption, is eradicated. The turbu- lent affections, which distract the heart, the hurtful lusts, which drown men in perdition, are removed, and in their room the dormant, though original, determinations of our nature, as it came blameless and very good from the hands of its Creator, are revived. The glow of Christian sympathy and Christian love is awakened. — The cheering, the delightful hope of immortality is excited. — That hope, which maketh not ashamed, — which gives dignity to our self-anxiety, nay even renders it holy, — prolongs, from time to eternity, our love for VOL. II. L 148 the present objects of our affection, — and re- stores to our hearts, with assured expectation, even those, whom death has snatched away. — Instead of the suggestions of the evil one, are ex- perienced the impulses, the fruits, of the Spirit of God. — Every delightful feeling of our nature is cherished, matured, and perfected. — No longer is felt that fearful looking after judg- ment, that terror which is torment. — There, in the Christian's paths, — is not heard the shout of vicious revelry, which leaves behind disgust and remorse. There, are not felt the stings of envy, revenge, and malice. His heart is the temple of the Lord, into which no evil thing can enter ; — it is the paradise of God, formed by the Word, blessed by the Spirit, and en- lightened by the presence of its Creator. Such, my fellow Christians, — would to God I could say such are, — such every one of us may be, if we receive not the grace of God in vain. — Such are the treasures, which the God of nature pours forth in glorious abundance for our acceptance. — Plenteous is the harvest.— May its gracious Giver grant, that the reapers be not few.— Do not your hearts, my fellow Chris- tians, join me in this prayer ?— If they do, let your actions, your conduct, bear testimony to your sincerity You can impart, or assist in imparting, toothers the knowledge of that Gos- 149 pel, which has been given for our common salva- tion. — Even in the tender mercy of our God can you participate. — That dayspring, which from on high hath visited us, you can assist in dis- playing to the eyes of those, who otherwise must continue to sit in darkness and the shadow of death. — You can assist in guiding into the way of peace the feet of those, who otherwise must be far from it. — God hath prepared the seed, and hath blessed the field. — Christian ! Put forth your hand to the plough. If you deem your Master's gifts of value ; — if you think his promises sure ; — aid in the diffusion of those gifts to others. — Christian ! If you believe in your God,— assist in leading others to his Gospel. SERMON VI. Micah. vi,— 8. He hath shewed thee, Oh Man ! what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God ? IT is a most humiliating comparison, and, therefore, a most useful one, to examine, in opposition with each other, the moral powers of man, as he is in himself, as he stands iso- lated from, and independant of, divine assist- ance, with his powers, and means of obedience, when under the teaching of the word of God, and the influence of the Holy Spirit. Placed, at the commencement of his existence, in the garden of Eden, Man disobeyed the command- ment, disbelieved the denunciation of punish- 151 ment, departed from his reliance on the mercy of his Creator, listened to the tempter, and pre- maturely aspired to that knowledge of good and evil, which his God had not as yet thought fit to communicate.— The faculty of distinguish- ing he indeed acquired by his fatal act, but the power of availing himself of it, of regulating his conduct thereby, he did not acquire ; but, on the contrary, by the corruption of his na- ture, rendered his obedience to the suggestions of this discrimination impossible. — He had, as it were, by some powerful drug, been gifted with a new species of vision, but the organ thereof was diseased and distorted ; his whole moral system was thereby paralized j — he saw, but saw imperfectly and falsely ; — he saw, but could not follow. The insufficiency, — the worse than insufficiency, of such a guidance was manifested in the history of mankind, from the time of the fall to that of the deluge, when violence had spread over the earth, when every thought of man's heart was evil continually, and all flesh had corrupted their way. It was manifested in the history of mankind, from the deluge, to the coming of the Redeemer, when all, but the favoured few, whom God thought fit to make the depositories of his promises and his will, when all, but these few, whom God vouchsafed to guide, were, because of their unbelief, given over to their own hearts' lusts, 152 and in consequence thereof, wrought all abomi- nations with greediness. — It is manifest, in the history of mankind, from the Redemption to this present day. — In which period, even temporal happiness and comfort, even the moral decencies of life, even the exterior of human virtue, have been, and are commensurate with and proportional to the duffusion of true reli- gion.-— Would you duly appreciate the efficacy of man's unaided moral power, go to those na- tions to whom the light of Christianity has not yet penetrated ; — you will find them compara- tively uncultivated, unhappy, and immoral. — Would you wish to extend the experiment, go to those among whom all traditionary reliques of Divine revelation have wholly perished, and you will find them sunk in the most degraded, the most disgusting, state of brutal vice, and savage misery. Go even to those of civilized mankind, who have despised, or even neglected the teaching of the word of God.— Though the intellectual advantages, among which they live, have improved and strengthened their mental powers ; though in science, in invention, in worldly prudence, in ingenuity, in that know- ledge, which is power, they are as Gods to the rest of mankind ; yet, there is one faculty, which these advantages have not affected. — Their moral discrimination of good and evil re- mains as impotent, as when it was purchased 153 by the shipwreck of Adam's faith and obedi- ence, at the fatal tree of Eden.— It cannot re- strain them from impurity. It cannot restrain them from sensuality. It cannot restrain them from chicanery and dishonesty. . It cannot re- strain them from slander, from revenge, from murder. — Nay the duellist will tell you, that it is his sense of honor, his moral sense, which leads him to the field. Wretched as is the Hindu, or the Musel- man ;— disgusting as is the savage ; the Chris tian who departs from the teaching of his God, and consults only his own heart for his conduct, is .more miserable, more vicious, more de- graded. God, however, has never yet left himself without a witness to mankind. — Through the family of Seth, he communicated to the ante- diluvian world the knowledge of his will. — In that family there was one, who, emphati- cally, walked with God; and another, whom the Almighty vouchsafed to make a preacher of righteousness, during the space of 120 years, a declarer of justification by a future Redeemer, while the long suffering of God suspended his vengeance over an offending world, in hopes, that they might have a faith in those promises, which should produce obedience ; — in hopes, 154 that they might believe in that Redeemer, and live. In after times, the family of Abraham were the vehicles of divine instruction to mankind, — the chosen people, the nation of Priests and Prophets, in whom all the families of the earth were to be blessed. — He left them, not to the vanity of their own imaginations, but gave them an undefiled law converting the soul, sure testimonies giving wisdom to the simple, right statutes making glad the heart, and pure com- mandments giving light unto the eyes. — In the emphatical language of my text, — " God hath " shewed thee ! oh man, what is good." — He hath not left thee to thine own devices. He hath not left thee to thine own powers of dis- crimination. He has marked out thy path.— He has ordained the good works, in which thou shouldst walk.— He has revealed to thee his will. He hath shewed thee, oh man ! what is good. — And what is the sum and substance of this revealed will, this religious morality, — this righteousness, which is of God ? Hear it in comprehensive and beautitul simplicity from the mouth of the Prophet. — " And what doth " the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, to " love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" — Hear from the Apostle, in what consists pure and undefiled religion. — Hear from the Re- 155 deemer himself, on what hang all the law and the Prophets. Suffer me, my fellow Christians, to call your attention, your most serious attention, to the several branches of this comprehensive sum- mary, to consider them separately, though they do not exist separately, — righteousness, — mercy, — and humhle dependance on God ; — Graces, which though three in character, are like him, from whom they proceed, but one in sub- stance. It would, perhaps, be superfluous to prove to you, that the words, by which the Prophet has conveyed the first of these injunctions, " to " do justly," are of far more comprehensive signification than the present, and vulgar use, of the word " justly" would seem to indicate. The meaning is by no means confined to making equitable decisions between man and man, nor even to the abstaining from injuring our neighbour's property by violence or fraud ; — but is the same as the word righteously would have expressed ; justice and righteousness, with their respective derivatives, being indiscrimi- nately used, in our version, as renderings of the same original words, and consequently meant to convey the same ideas. — Now righteousness, and consequently justice, in its Scriptural sense, 156 implies the fulfilment of every thing, which is enjoined in the divine law ; whether it respects others, or ourselves, the discharge of every practical duty, the obligation to which is ren- dered, what moralists call, perfect, by being commanded by the word of God. — When, there- fore, we are required to do justly, we are requir- ed not merely to abstain from dishonesty, but also from hatred, from variance, from wrath, from strife, from seditions, from factions, from envy- ings, and from murders ; — we are required, not merely to abstain from sining against our neighbour, but also against ourselves, — to ab- stain from fornications, uncleaness, lascivious- ness, drunkeness, and revellings : — we are called on, in every relation of life, to cease to do evil, and to learn to do well ; — we are en- joined to moral innocence, and to moral acti- vity,— to be obedient to our parents and supe- riors, grateful to our friends, equitable to all men, useful to our country. — All these, some moralist may say, are but the dictates of rea- son, the selections of our moral sense. — True, if thereby be meant, what reason must ap- prove on consideration, though she had not herself discovered, — what, on being presented to our moral sense, must be most grateful, though we had not been led thereto by that sense. Though human wisdom led not man- kind to the mine to seek the useful ore, yet 157 when it was found, she approved its advantages, and appreciated its value. — Though the children of Israel found not, nor even sought for a spring in the wilderness, yet when the living streams followed the rod of Moses from the stoney rock, they were refreshed by, and re- joiced in their waters. — Truly the yoke of Christ is easy, and his burden is light. — The first command of that kingdom, which the Holy Spirit would establish within us, is to no un- reasonable privation, no useless sacrifice, no toilsome or difficult or dangerous exertion ; — it is not, (in the language of the Prophet,) that we should come before the most high God with burnt sacrifices, with thousands of rams, or ten thousand rivers of oil ; — it is not that we should give our first born for our transgression, or the fruit of our body for the sin of our soul, — but, that we should follow the most approved dic- tates of our reason, the most pleasing reflec- tions of our moral discrimination. But, this is not enough. — That the man of God may be perfectly furnished unto all good works, he must add to his patient continuance in well doing brotherly kindness and charity. — To whatsoever things are just, to whatsoever things are pure, he must add that, which is lovely, which is of good report.— We are called on, not merely to those things, the obligation 158 to which is perfect, but also to those, whose obligation is inferior ;— not merely to those, which we are commanded, but also those, to which we are exhorted. It is required of us, not only that we should do justly, but also that we should love mercy. — Is it difficult, my fellow Christians, to love,— -to practise, mercy ?— Is it not rather the gratification of the most de- lightful feelings of our hearts ? — Is it not rather the enjoyment of the finest emotions, and the greatest exstacy ? — Tell me, any among you, who have ever bent over the bed of desolate sickness, — who have restored the afflicted, and bound up the broken hearted, — who have wit- nessed the combination of gratitude to your- selves with pious thanksgivings to your God,— tell me, what is the sensual pleasure, for years of which you would exchange that moment ? Yes, my fellow Christians, the yoke of Christ is easy, and his burden is light. The first com- mand of the kingdom of God is, that we should obey the dictates of the most perfect reason ; the next, that we should gratify the purest na- tural affection ; — an affection the source of the most unmixed pleasure, without remorse or satiety,— encreasing, by every indulgence, both in influence and enjoyment, — consecrating us to be the ministers of the Almighty's love to mankind, and drawing us every day more near the great pattern for our imitation, the God 159 of our hope. — We ourselves are the children of mercy. Our creation, our preservation, our redemption, all the blessings of this life,— every happiness or comfort we possess, are from the mercy of God. — Shall we not therefore be merciful, even as our Father, which is in heaven, is merciful ?— Jesus, who gave himself for us, who, while he was perfect God, was also perfect man, displayed, as one of the most prominent and pleasing characteristics of that perfect human nature, compassion. — He had compas- sion on the multitude, as you have heard in the lesson of this day, and he miraculously fed them. — He had compassion on the sick, and he healed them. — He had compassion on the sisters of Lazarus, — he wept, — and raised their brother from the dead. — He had compassion on the in- habitants of Jerusalem, he preached the Gospel to their poor, and anxiously sought to gather them to him, with every expression of the fondest parental solicitude. — Can it then be difficult, or grievous, or absurd, to follow the suggestion of that natural affection, which was the most distinguishing property of human nature, when in its most perfect state j that feature, which it has retained of the re- semblance of God in which it was created ; — that quality, which was withdrawn from the gentile world because of their unbelief, when they were left implacable, unmerciful, without 160 natural affection,— but which has been restored to us by the blood of Christ, as one of the first earnests of our redemption ? To follow such an affection cannot be grievous. — Truly* the ways of heavenly wisdom are ways of plea- santness, and all her paths are peace. The third injunction of the Prophet is, that we should walk humbly with our God. — This is the last, the highest step of the climax, and virtually implies the presence of the two others. — They cannot exist without it. They must exist with it. — It is in the fear of the Lord, that, by the union of righteousness and mercy, we must perfect holiness. Even if they could exist separately from it, they would be insufficient j they would be but the righteousness of the Pharisee, inferior in value to the single aspiration of humility from the miserable, sinful, Publican ; — they would be but the deeds of the law, by which shall no flesh be justified. Need I remind you of the importance, which, throughout the history and precepts of the Sacred Scriptures, appears to be attached to this heavenly temper of mind ? —It was a disposition of mind the direct op- posite of humility, which led our first parents to be dissatisfied with their Creator, for having withheld from them the knowledge of good and 161 evil, and to seek to be as gods by its acquisi- tion. — The tempter himself had fallen by pride, and to the pride of man did he apply himself, as the surest instrument of his ruin. And in our redemption from that ruin, did our blessed Saviour, both by example and by precept, la- bour to counteract its original cause. His life was a life of humility and submission. His death was of the greatest humility. — Every par- ticular of his history seems designed to coun- teract the spirit of human pride, in all its va- ried shapes, to crush the head of that serpent, to which man had owed his destruction. As he most eminently had fulfilled all righteousness, as he most sincerely had compassion on man- kind, so did he most especially walk humbly with his God. And why should we not most readily follow the steps of our meek Redeemer ? What have we whereof to boast ourselves before God, be- fore whom no flesh should glory ? — What good thing have we, which we have not received ? Has man, of himself, the power of doing justly ? — Look to the history of philosophy, and of mankind, from their first commencement, to the coming of the Redeemer, and you will find that when theory was most attended to, then was practice most deficient ; — when mora- lity was best understood, then was mankind 162 most vicious nay, even the very teachers themselves given up to the most disgusting the most degrading unrighteousness.— When the tree of the knowledge of good and evil was most carefully cultivated, then was it most bar- ren. — Has man, of himself, the power of lov- ing mercy ? — A thousand voices will, from their own feelings, proudly answer me, he has. — Is it your own, my fellow Christians, or is it the gift of God ? — The Scripture, to which I have before alluded, declares, that before Christ had triumphed over the powers of darkness, before "he had led our captivity captive, and given gifts unto men, — mankind were left without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful ; and the his- tory of mankind confirms the gloomy represen- tation. — Go even to those nations of the pre- sent day, who have not yet received the light of Christianity, and enquire into their treat- ment of each other, — their religious rites, — their conduct towards defenceless strangers.— Go to the Indian's funeral pile, or his festival ; — to the African's honouring of his departed relatives ; — to the savage's celebration of his victory ; — and tell me, whether mercy be a constituent faculty of unredeemed human na- ture. — No, my fellow Christians, if you have a heart of flesh instead of a heart of stone, it is the gift of God. — If you occasionally experi- 163 ence the pleadings of compassion, it is the voice of God, — the influence of the spirit. — Cherish it, — follow it ; — while you humbly feel, that it is not of yourselves, but of the grace of God j — while you give the glory to him, of whom cometh every good gift, — from whom all good counsels, all holy desires, all just works do proceed. — Follow his guidance ; — and, while you do justly,— while you love mercy, walk humbly with your God. VOL. II. SERMON VII. I. Peter, iv.— 10 and 1 1. As every man hath received the gift, even so minister the same one to another, as good Stew- ards of tlie manifold grace of God. If any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God. If any man minister, let him do it, as of the ability, which God giveth ; that God in all things may be glorified, through Jesus Christ. HAD we no other argument for the truth of the Christian religion, that which results from its analogy to the beneficence of God in the material universe, might, perhaps, be sufficient to induce us to consider it as of divine origi- nal. — If the obvious order, and beauty, and bounty, which surround us, supply, even to 1 165 the most savage, a suggestion of the being of a Creator, and an indication of his wisdom and benevolence, — shall not a system, which is every way calculated to produce moral order and moral beauty, be referred, by educated man, to the same Almighty, allwise, allmerci- ful, power ? If the heavens declare the glory of God, because, the various bodies, which occupy the vast expansion, are each adapted to mutual influence, and mutual good, because, nothing exists therein useless or independent, shall not a religion, whose first principle binds its votary to every other human being, which rejects every thing exclusively selfish, and cherishes every charity of our nature, proclaim its mighty source, and indicate, that it proceeds from that God, whose mercy is over all his works ? Among the various forms, which the wisdom, or the weakness of man, has, from time to time, devised for rendering themselves acceptable to a superior being, not one possessed this sacred characteristic. — While the science of the mo- ralist led him to refer the social duties to a prin- ciple of selfishness for their obligation ; while he defined morality to be the art of procuring happiness ; the connection between morality and religion never struck his imperfect, his clouded mental vision. Nay so little did they m 2 166 seem related, that even to their very gods the heathens did not attribute the moral virtues. They approached these debased representations of the Deity with costly sacrifices and sumptu- ous oblations, not having washed their hands in innocency, and shewed mercy to the afflicted. • — They vainly thought, that they could give glory to God without having good will to mankind. Even where the presumptuous self sufficiency of man dared to intermingle itself with the light which was of God, and to pronounce that something beyond the Gospel, something more than what was contained in the Scriptures, was requisite for salvation, the resulting gloom of superstition set mankind on a thousand vain devices. — One isolated himself from the duties of society, and fancied that seclusion from the world could consecrate to God a heart, which to mankind had been hard and unfeeling. Another placed his religion in orthodoxy of tenet and zeal against disputing adversaries ; he gave to the service of his God speculation in lieu of practice, and devoted his understand- ing while he witheld his affections. — A third was taught to make compensation for his neglect of his brother, or his violence against him, to pay the price of his obedience to that God, who will have mercy rather than sacrifice, by 167 embracing some revolting mortification, nay even by presenting some costly gift to the mi- nisters of his worship ; as if the suicide of Judas, or his casting down in the Temple the wages of his iniquity, could atone for his having deserted and betrayed his master. — These vain deceits he, that possesses the sure hope of the Gospel of Christ, despises. These forms of Godliness he, that hath the power of Godliness, rejects. These cisterns, which will hold no water, he, that hath within him the well of living waters, refuses. His religion alone of all others, the Christian's religion singly and exclusive of all others, declares, that the love of mankind is the best adoration, which we can pay to our God. — " Blessed are the merciful, blessed are " the peace-makers, blessed are the meek, " blessed are they that hunger and thirst after " righteousness." — Such are the fruits of the Spirit of the Christian's God. — Such are the works, in which our God has ordained that we should walk, — to which his law directs, his grace invigorates, and his Spirit constrains us ; — dispositions, affections, works, which fit us for being the instruments of his mercy, and proclaim, that the religion, which conveys them, is the voice of Nature's God. Mark, my fellow Christians, how the Apostle enjoins these duties. " As every man hath re- 168 " ceived the gift, even so minister the same one " to another, as good Stewards of the mani- " fold grace of God." — Manifold indeed has been the grace of God to us. — Let us not close our eyes to the mercies of our God, because we live in the midst of them, because they beam in glory round us. Let us not forget our God, because his blessings are familiar, because he is about our path, and about our bed, and lifts up the light of his countenance on all our ways. I do not mean to expatiate on the ad- vantages, which we possess as a people ; on the proud, the exalted rank, which we hold among the nations of the earth ; but suffer me to call your attention to those gifts, which we have re- ceived as individuals. — Compare your situation as individuals with that enjoyed by your fellow men in any other country, or any other age. — Go back to the remotest periods of antiquity. — A vast extensive gloom of ignorance and misery presents itself, diversified by some occasional in- tervals of partial civilization, some nebulee in the mighty void, whose light was obscurity com- pared to the splendor, which now beams on you. — Compare yourselves with your pagan forefathers, untaught, wretched, and con- temptible, scarce surpassing the brutes that perish, save in the skill and power of inflicting mutual evil. — Compare yourselves with those, who lived beneath that cloud of superstition, 169 that shadow of death, which hid the sun of righteousness from the eyes of mankind ; — that antichristian misrule, which closed the book of God from the people, and sent forth an unholy ministry to prophecy deceits to the world. — Compare yourselves with the present inhabitants of other climes ; — with the barba- rian, who bows before some frightful Idol, and devotes his own, or his brother's blood, in their abominable rites* — darkened in his foolish heart, and sacrificing, with criminal insanity, his child, or his parent, the widow, or the unpro- tected stranger. — Compare yourselves even with these, who boast of superior refinement, and class themselves under the name of Christians, — who can contend with you in arts and arms, nay almost surpass you in science, but have not been blest, equally with you, in the more glorious light of the Gospel. Behold them living under a form of godliness, which sub- stitutes the devices of men for the simplicity of Christ,— led away, prevented from the con- templation of the real beauties of his religion, by the magnificent pageantry of an unapropri- ate and unbecoming dress, — some following in the crowd with blind and cold acquiescence, others of more fastidious minds rejecting be- cause they are disgusted,— seeking in infidelity a retreat from what offends them, — shuting their eyes on the precipice of time, on the iro verge of eternity, because the exhalations of a fen have obscured and distorted the light of heaven. You, my fellow Christians, are not like any of these. You possess advantages, beyond what any period in the mighty course of ages presents to the historian's view, beyond what any country on the vast surfice of the globe can boast. You possess a religion, in comparison of which, the wicked fictions of human weak- ness are not even to be mentioned, — a form of Christianity, which the simplest must admire, the wisest must approve, the most fastidious cannot fault ; which contains every thing, which revelation has conveyed, and nothing more ; — a faith, in which the devices of man have not intermingled, a church, which has cautiously abstained from adding aught to, or subtracting aught from, the written word of God, and has raised an altar to his glory, over which the implements of human art have not been exer- cised. How shall we escape, my fellow Christians, if we neglect so great salvation ? How does it become us to act, on whom the light of the world has thus beamed with such unclouded splendor ? — We have received of the gift of God.-— We have received of it largely and sin- 171 gularly. — A talent of surpassing value has been committed to our charge. While we keep it to our soul's advantage, we must employ it to our Master's service. " Even so, let us minister " one to another, as good Stewards of the " manifold grace of God." Think not, my fellow Christians, that my meaning is, that we should all become actual preachers of the Word of God, or missiona- ries of the Gospel, to those who need its illu- mination. — These offices belong to those, who are called, fitted, ordained to the public minis- try. — But there are other services, other modes of promoting the knowledge of God and the kingdom of God, which lie within the compass of every Christian's power, and are the objects of every Christian's duty. Every one of us, under the grace of God, can give, if it be not our own neglect, that most impressive, that most convincing lesson, which a life adorned by the graces of a Christian spirit affords to man- kind. — Every one of us can bear testimony to the efficacy of the Gospel of Christ, can give a reason, an evidence, of the hope which is in us, by the purity of our lives, and the since- rity of our practice. — Gifted indeed must that preacher be, blessed that missionary, through whom the Word of God can come with greater power to turn the hearts of the disobedient to 172 the wisdom of the just, than through the ex- ample of a pure and holy life of the humblest believer. — Vain will be his efforts, and transi- tory his success, except the practice of his first hearers bear testimony to the value of his doctrine. — Man attends not to precept, un- til example has shewed him its practicability and effect. His heart is rooted on society. To that it assimilates itself ; from that it takes its inclinations, its habits, its form, and its fruit. — On you, my fellow Christians, (and the con- sideration is a most awful one,) depend, in a great measure, the future, the eternal pros- pects of those, with whom Providence has im- plicated you, whether in the opportunities of occasional intercourse, or the endearing bonds of relationship and affection. — To your brother, to your friend, to your parents, to your fami- lies, may you be the ministers of the manifold grace of God. — Your example may be instruc- tion to the ignorant, animation to the cold and careless, confusion to the scoffer, and convic- tion to the unbeliever. — Ye have been placed by the singular bounty of Providence in an high and holy station, — to be the lights of the world. — Let that light so shine before men, that they may glorify your Father, which is in heaven. " "Wherefore if any man speak," says the 173 Apostle, " let him speak as the oracles of " God."— And is this, indeed, what ought to be the character of the Christian's conversation ? If any man speak, let him speak as the ora- cles of God.— Let him speak purely, sincerely, affectionately, instructively, to the good of man and the glory of God. — Let him speak consola- tion to the afflicted, wisdom to the ignorant, counsel to the weak, reproof to the sinner.— Let his conversation be profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness, that himself and his hearers may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. Will the trifler meet with amusement, will the scoffer, the careless, those who are lovers of pleasure more than lovers of God, meet with countenance in the oracles of God ? Surely not. Neither should they find it in the conversation of a Christian. — The value of words, their vast importance, is not known, or at least not remembered j or mankind would never trifle with them as they do. — A word spoken in due season has oftentimes produced, and is always capable of producing, the hap- piest effects.— At the crisis of temptation, when revenge, or selfihness, some importunate de- sire, or overwhelming passion, has nearly tri- umphed, oft has the meek advice of a Chris- tian friend reversed the victory j — oft has the affectionate caution, the humble reproof, de- 174 spised and neglected in the midst of turbulent pleasure and careless security, returned in the hour of sickness or sorrow or even disgust, re- turned to the scorner's heart, and led him to his God. — On the other hand, my fellow Chris- tians, every verbal dereliction of Christian du- ty, which levity or heedlessness may lead us into, exclusive of its proper criminality, — con- veys to our hearers a persuasion, that we care not for the things of God, and casts a suspi- cion of insincerity and hypocrisy on our future professions. — By our words are we esteemed righteous ; by our words are we condemned by our,, hearers ; and our influence on them, our power of doing them good, depends on the decision. — Of every idle word must we give an account. " Wherefore if any man speak, let " him speak as the oracles of God." " Moreover," saith the Apostle, " if any " man minister, let him do it as of the ability " which God giveth, — that God may be glori- " fled in all things, through Jesus Christ." — That is, when we minister to the wants of others, let us do it with the recollection, that it is God who has given us both the means, and the inclination. Can there be a stronger incen- tive to the performance of our duty in this re- spect, than the persuasion, that the ability is of God. — If we be indeed instruments of mercy 175 in his hand, if we be indeed stewards of his manifold grace, if the suggestions of public af- fection, the calls of sympathy, the pleadings of compassion in our hearts, be indeed the voice of God within us, and the means of complying with them his gift, shall we not be willing in the day of his power ? Shall we not follow, with grateful reverence, the guidance of his spirit ? It is the way, in which he declares he will be glorified ; — and what more glorious spe- tacle can there be, than to behold the human heart turned from the gloom of selfishness, to the light of Christian love ? — But, that our ministration to the wants of others be to the glory of God, it must be so through Jesus Christ ; — and it will be so, if we always, and carefully, keep in mind that the ability is of God. — This reflection will banish every feeling of pride, and ostentation, and self-sufficiency. The doers will be humble and retired, the works will be manifest j they will be done in Christ Jesus ; men shall behold them as the fruits of his kingdom, and God, not man shall be glori- fied. SERMON Vlir Proverbs, iv. — 23. Keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life. AMONG the many peculiar beauties, which distinguish the style of the sacred Scriptures, there is one, which most eminently presents it- self to our observation. — And that is, that figu- rative language never seems to have been re- curred to, merely for the sake of ornament, but always where the strength of the idea ab- solutely demanded some unusual, some uncom- mon, representation. — Regardless of sublimi- 177 ty, careless of those graces, for which Eastern composition is proverbial, the sacred writers present to us a style, which for strength, sub- limity, and beauty, never has been equalled. The passage I have chosen for my text af- fords an impressive instance of the justice of this remark. " Keep thy heart with all dili- " gence." Could the meaning have been ex- pressed more briefly, or more simply ? " For " out of it are the issues of life." Could the utmost art of the rhetorician have supplied a bolder, a happier, a more impressive figure,— forcing itself, and fixing itself, on the under- standing, bearing with it elucidation and argu- ment, beauty and conviction ? Superficial, indeed, must his acquaintance with human nature be, who imagines, that our conduct results solely from the determinations of our reason. Though we be naturally de- termined to pursue what appears to be good, it is passion, it is appetite, it is the heart, which delineates the representation. — Even in cases where there is time for full enquiry, even then does this influence operate with considerable sway.— But in the far greater part of human conduct, where the necessity of immediate ex- ertion will not await the delays of deliberation, there are our desires and our habits the sole 178 sovereigns ; — there, is our heart the great source of action ; — out of it are the issues of life. — And how much more so, when indulgence shall have strenghened our passions, — and indolence debilitated our reason, when the deaf adder shall have closed his ears to the voice of the charmer, charm he never so wisely. Hence the necessity of keeping the heart with all diligence, of regulating its passions, of controlling its habits. — But how shall we ef- fect this ? For the word of God, and indeed our own experience, declares to us, that the heart is deceitful above all things, and despe- rately wicked ; that its every thought is evil continually ; — that it has fallen, by the corrup- tion of sin, from the likeness of God, in which it was created, from the goodness, in which every thing that God had made was declared to participate. But, while the word of God thus declares the corruption of the human heart, it also proclaims its remedy ; while it tells us, that the spring is poisoned, it also indicates what shall miracu- lously heal its waters. — " Believe on the Lord " Jesus, and thou shalt be saved,"— not merely from future condemnation, but from present sin, from the weakness, the violence, the pas- sion, the impotence, the corruption, of thine 179 own heart.— -When her king was set on Sion, the hill became holy. When the Redeemer is enthroned on the human heart, it becomes pure, even as he is pure. — They that believe on the Lord will love the Lord. They shall be taught in the way, and shall know that the teaching is of God. — They shall keep his command- ments, and the Lord shall come unto them, and take up his abode with them. — A kingdom, which is not of this world, shall be established within them. A temple, not made with hands, shall be raised, whose purity and whose glory shall far surpass the utmost exertions of human wisdom, or of human power. — Their Redeemer shall send to them another Comforter, an ex- horter, a suggester of holy desires, good coun- sels, and just works, — taking from them the heart of stone, and giving them an heart of flesh ; — obviating the fluctuations of their faith, encouraging the breathings of hope, cherishing the spark of love, and displaying, even in their weakness, the strength and the sufficiency of their God. — Think not, my fellow Christians, that the Spirit of God is withheld from the humble believer, because you behold not its supernatural, its miraculous effects. — When the Prophet sought it, he found it not in the whirl- wind, lie found it not in the thunder, he found it not in the magnificence of convulsed nature, but in the " still small voice," — which might VOL. II. N 180 have escaped the careless, or been neglected by the indolent. — Such is the influence of the Spirit in the believer's heart. The " still small " voice" is ever with him. It is about his path. It is about his bed. It accompanies him in all his ways. — Its test is the written Word of God, to which it is ever conformable.— The Christian's part is to approve it by that test, to satisfy himself by that test, that the inclina- tion is of God, — to obey, to follow with grate- ful reverence, to abstain from grieving that spirit, whereby he is sealed, and to v;ork out his own salvation with fear and trembli* g, while he feels, that it is God, which worketh in him, both to will and to do.— It is the Chris- tian's part to watch and to pray, that he enter not into temptation, for though the spirit is willing, the flesh is weak j — though the spirit is ever willing, and ever ready, to aid our weak- ness, to sustain our infirmities, yet these infir- mities are tremendously great, — the conflict with sin is always to be looked to with fear and trembling. Oh ! my fellow Christians, care- fully distinguish between confidence in God, and that mistaken self-confidence, that spiri- tual pride, which would lead you to be careless about exposing yourselves to temptation. — Many have fallen from the grace of God. — You possibly may fall.— It is God which work- eth in you, anu should you neglect so great sal- 181 vation, how shall you escape ?— Carefully avoid every opportunity, every excitement, which may lead to the developement of the fruits of your own hearts, of the works of the flesh.— Avoid the impure thought ; it may end in las- civiousness. — Avoid the proness to take of- fence ; it may end in strife, in debate, in mur- der. — Avoid the unkind construction of your neighbour's conduct, it may end in hatred. But above all things, avoid all levity with re- spect to religion, all indolence, as to those means, which God has appointed for keeping alive the remembrance of him it may end in open and bold impiety, leaving you unaided, and exposed to an host of foes, the passions of your own hearts, the self-created offspring of a fallen and corrupted nature. — It is not, when ' sin has gained strength by our reception of its first advances, that we may best hope to resist with success, but at its earliest approach. Jt is not, when the grace of God has been ne- glected, that we can expect its encreased ener- gy. Watch, therefore, every appearance, every indication of evil, and avoid it.— -Keep your heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of your life. But, it is not enough, to avoid the contami- nation of positive guilt ; it is not enough, to seek to secure our Master's talent from loss, or n 2 182 from tarnish. — To temperance, and goodness, we must add brotherly kindness and charity. — We must, not only, avail ourselves of his aid in resisting temptation ; but we must also fol- low his guidance, must cherish his seed, and cultivate his fruits. — Nor is it indeed possible, in practice, to separate innocence and active good will to mankind from each other, where we would have one, there must the other be also. — Would we avoid the works of the flesh, we must encourage the fruits of the spirit. Adapted by its natural capacities and facul- ties to action, prone by its natural desires to the exercise of its powers, the mind of man cannot lie torpid, it must have employment ; if it be not * occupied with good, it will with evil, its enjoy- ment consists in the agitation of affection ; and if the objects of that affection be not God and the will of God, they will be the world, they will be sin. So sensible of this were the old philosophers, that they held the various branches of know- ledge to be not only useful, but necessary, to man, and presented to him the sciences as the purifiers of the soul. — But, my fellow Chris- tians, here was the boasted wisdom of man de- ficient. — The remedy it proposed was applica- ble but to few, to those, whose leizure, whose 183 opportunity, whose talents, fitted for the pur- suit ; and even to these few presented an in- ducement too weak to contend with passion, too contracted to occupy exclusively the sphere of human action, too little to fill the human heart, and shut out the intrusion of sin. — The best informed philosophers, the men of most extensive natural research, were too often given up to selfishness and impurity and hard- ness of heart, — and displayed a melancholy proof that the wisdom of this world is foolish- ness before God. Constrast now with the insufficiency of this remedy, the sufficiency which is of God. — Compare with these, the objects, the occupa- tions, the inducements, which the Gospel points out to the Christian, — the gifts, which the Spi- rit of God confers on the believer, the fruits, which it produces. — His heart is filled with the love of God. — Faith has kindled that love, by assuring him, that his God hath first loved him, and given himself for him ; hope has cherished it, by intimating, that he who sent his son to be the propitiation for our sins will with him freely give us all things.— The word of his God declares to him, that the best indication of that love is the ex- ercise of the kindly affections towards his fel- low men ; and these are affections, which can 184 fill, can expand, the human heart, can facinate it from every meaner object, can wholly possess, and keep it secure, from the attack of every sinful passion, the intrusion of every sensual desire.— In the love of God, and of his brother, he posseses that principle, which envieth not, vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, doeth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not the grati- fication of selfishness, is not easily provoked, designeth no evil, rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth, that principle, which never faileth. Here, my fellow Christians, is the antidote for the poison of our nature, the remedy for the works of the flesh, for the uncleaness, the hatred, the wrath, the envyings, the murders, the drunkeness, and such like. — The believer hears the word of God commanding him, he feels the Spirit of God inducing him, inclining him, impelling him, to love his brother. — He visits the fatherless, and the widow, in their affliction ; and thereby keeps himself unspotted from the world, and experiences, that it is better to go to the house of mourning, than to the house of joy. — He has compassion on the ignorant, and on them that are out of the way ; he feeds the hungry, he clothes the naked ; he meets the Spirit of his Redeemer at the bed of sickness, and in the gloom of the prison; — 185 he descends into the pool of human misery, and the angel of God, while he disturbs its waters, heals him of every infirmity. Bear with me, my fellow Christians, and at- tribute not my appropriation of Scripture ima- gery to any other cause, than the strength of my own conviction, and my earnestness to im- press it on you, that innocence and active virtue are inseparable ; that the exercise of the kindly affections are the means, whereby the Holy Spirit regenerates the human heart, and frees it from from the bondage of sin ; that patient continu- ance in well doing is the road to holiness, as well as to immortality. — Oh ! my fellow Chris- tians, cherish these affections, yield yourselves to them, gratify them. Cherish them,— they are the gift of God, and they are the voice of God. Cherish them, they will quench the strength of passion j they will break the deter- mination of revenge ; they will root up the stings of envy and of pride ; they will dash from your lips the cup of sensuality. — Now, in the spring of life, now, in the morning of your days, ere the thorns shall have sprung up, ere the midday shall have parched the soil, cherish these affections j they will bring an abundant harvest, peace, and patience, gentleness, and goodness, meekness, and temperance. — Cherish these affections ; they will lead you from 186 strength to strength. Every victory, which you experience over sin, will strengthen the source of that victory, by causing you to know that your Redeemer liveth, and that you are the object of his love. — Every submission to the guidance of the Holy Spirit will convince you, that the teaching is of God. — You will go on from strength to strength, till you arrive at the fulness of the Christian stature. You will find, that your Redeemer's yoke is easy, his burden is light, his ways are ways of pleasant- ness, and all his paths are peace. I have now, my fellow Christians, called to your observation two methods, which are highly conducive to the keeping your hearts with all diligence. One is the cautious avoidance of exposure to temptation, the praying to God to lead you not into temptation, but rather to deliver you from the conflict with the evil one. The other is the constant exercise of the kindly affections of good will to mankind, with which the Holy Spirit has blessed and adorned his temple. — To these I would add a third. I mean the cultivation of Christian friendships. This however, too important to be slightly hurried over, I shall defer to a future opportu- nity. May he, that is able to keep you from falling, 187 and to present yon faultless before the throne of his glory with exceeding joy, — may the God of all peace, without whom nothing is good, nothing is holy, breathe into your hearts that most excellent gift of Charity, which is the very bond of peace and of all virtue. SERMON IX. Proverbs, iv.— 23. Keep thy heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life. To a mind that delights in meditating on the ways of God, and in cherishing the love of its Creator, by the contemplation of his glorious works, a comparison of the arrange- ments and process of the material universe with those, by which Providence administers the affairs of men, and again, with those, by which the Holy Spirit promotes and establishes the spiritual kingdom of Christ within the be- liever's heart, cannot fail of being highly in- teresting. 189 We behold the mighty fabric of the natural world sustained and perpetuated by a few sim- ple tendencies, impressed on matter, while its several parts perform their offices unconscious of the power, which retains them in their un- changeable courses, or of the glory, which re- sults from their combination. But, while the stupendous system, which surrounds us, declares the unspeakable skill and power of its Creator, it is but his lowliest work ; we can ascend from the consideration of it to that of a far greater display of wisdom and omnipotence. The cre- ation of the material world was but a single act. The Almighty said, Let there be light, and there was light. — By a single command be con- ferred on matter a few simple properties, which originated its varied organisation, and shall perpetuate its order and beauty, until the same Almighty word shall again interfere; but the regulation of human events is a continued ex- ertion ; there the wisdom and benevolence of the Deity is about the path, and nbout the bed, and spieth out all the ways, of innumera- ble beings, beings gifted, not with unconsci- ous tendencies, but with rational inclinations, with the multitude of passions and desires, changing with their several objects, and fluc- tuating with the varied combinations of cir- cumstances and of appetite. And yet all these are made, by an overuling Providence, to con- 190 duce to one grand outline, one foreseen, one foretold, scheme of human history. " Known " unto God are all his works from the begin- " ning;" and to the predetermined arrange- ment of these works are the virtues, and the vices of mankind, their wisdom, and their follies, their very impiety, and their very crime, their every thought, and word, and action, though perfectly voluntary, and perfectly free, made perfectly subservient, by an overuling Providence operating at all times and in all places. What glory would we give, what wis- dom would we attribute, to any human Poten- tate, who could so rule even a few intellectual beings, as to turn their voluntary actions to predetermined wise and beneficient purposes ? How far should we prefer him to the sage, who could penetrate the inmost recesses of nature, or to the artist, who could devise the most ingenious combinations of her powers! How wonderful then, how unspeakable, must be the glory of God's moral providence ! Can there be a mightier display of divine wisdom, and divine power ? There can, there is j — and that is the establishment of the kingdom of God within the believer's heart. It is not on the face of a chaos of materials newly created, and equally succeptible of all impressions, but over the wreck of a fallen and 191 ruined nature, where every principle is adverse to his influence, that the Spirit of God is dif- fused, preparatory to this mighty operation. It is not over the wills of beings, who think they are pursuing their private objects, who, while they contribute to the designs of Provi- dence, know not what they do, and therefore cannot have resisted his will, that this influence is here exerted, but over the passions, the de- sires, the desperate wickedness, of a heart, which is conscious of being led directly con- trary to its natural, its habitual, enjoyments. It is not creation ; it is regeneration. It is not government ; it is victory. And in the great work of this regeneration, this perpetual process, this leading captive the captivity of nature, the subject is at first conscious and re- sisting, afterwards conscious and voluntary. Feeling the influence, knowing that the teach- ing is of God, and yet voluntary in his actions, he is led to offer himself a freewill sacrifice to his Redeemer, — the very affections, with which God has adorned our natures, at first rising in rebellion against the Saviour, afterwards grace- ing his triumph. The fear and the shame of man, which before had kept the sinner in his bonds, no longer restrain him. His only fear is now the fear of God, — the beginning of wisdom. What before was his shame is now his glory j and his former glory is his shame. 192 His hatred, his anger, which before had rested on his fellow man, has now become the hatred of sin, and that, not so much in others, as in himself. His pride, his ambition, is for the testimony of a good conscience. — His anxiety for the dearest objects of his affection is, that they may be loved of God ; — for the young, that they may be brought up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord ; and for the old, that they may continue therein. His every passion has found its legitimate object, reason and imagination have been restored to their proper state. The insanity of sin has been removed, and the grace of God has made him free indeed. But, while God is thus all in all, while he is our sufficiency and our salvation, while he works in us both to will and to do, he also commands our own exertions. He calls on us to watch and pray, to fear, to tremble, and to work ; and, though he who never sleeps or slumbers is our guardian, he enjoins us to keep our heart with all diligence, for out of it are the issues of life. He, first, by breaking the bonds of sin, by renewing a right spirit within us, by being the author and finisher of our faith, by suggesting to us good counsels, holy desires, just works, confers on us the power of action, and then, commands its exertion. — He first, 193 restores Lazarus to life, and then, says, come forth from the tomb. Except the Lord keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain ; yet, though the Lord do keep the city, yet must the Christian soldier wake and watch. And first, against that self confidence, which would lead us to be careless about exposing our- selves to temptation ; next, against that indo- lence, which would lead us to neglect the prac- tice of active good will to mankind, the patient continuance in well doing, as the best security against the inroads of sin j against these must the Christian soldier cautiously watch. On these topics I took occasion, on a former oppor- tunity, more fully to insist. Suffer me now to call your attention to ano- ther and most important means of keeping your heart with diligence. I mean the regulation, the selection, of your private friendships. At your age, my fellow Christians, the human heart needs society ; it longs for it, it seeks it, it cannot isolate itself. Faint though they be, yet the traces of its Creator's image remain. It seeks whereon to repose its love, whereon to exercise its kindness. — It is for age alone, long conversant with a depraved world, to feel, or to fancy, what can secure the heart 194 against these natural inclinations. — Youth must have friends ; and on the nature of these friends does it depend (humanly speaking) for its fu- ture character. — With the pure, thou shalt be pure ; but with the froward, thou shalt learn frowardness. — The intercourse of friendship directs the passions, influences the judgment, forms and perpetuates the habits, and the stronger, or sometimes the more cunning, mind succeeds in fashioning the other according to its own likeness. — Hence the danger, and hence the value, of friendship.— Oh ! my fellow Chris- tians, keep your hearts with all diligence, for out of them are the issues of your life. Let me entreat you, most cautiously to ab- stain even from intimacy with the wicked, with those who think lightly of the commands of God, who boldly, or even carelessly, outrage morality. Intimacy may lead to friendship, The more attractive the manners, the more facinating the conversation, the greater is the danger. — If they wish for your friendship let them forsake their evil ways, let them approach you without the contagion of pestilence. — Give not that which is holy to the dogs. Lean not on the shattered reed ; it may wound you to death. But perhaps you will say, those, who are free 195 from faults, those who fear the Lord, are not gifted with attractions ; they are not gay ; they are not of the rank, to which we aspire j they are not likely to be useful, or even amusing, in life ; we can be good enough, and do well enough, without them ; they are therefore by no means desirable as friends. — Are they not ? my fellow Christians Have they, like their Master, no form, or comeliness, for which we should desire them ? When your object is the acquisition of academic honors, you prefer the intimacy of those, who have already been fore- most in the same pursuit. — In every line of fu- ture life you will covet the acquaintance of those, whom you think can best promote the objects you have in view. — And if among your present objects, — if the foremost of them, be, sincerely, the love of God, will you not join yourselves to those, who, you have reason to believe, are objects of his favour,-— who are most likely to encourage and invigorate you, to assist and confirm you, in the pursuit ? — Are not such desireable as friends ?— Perhaps, there cannot be well imagined a character, more fit- ted to sustain the several duties resulting from social intercourse, than that which is formed by the principles and spirit of the Gospel. The spirit of the Gospel is love ; and love is the fulfilling of the law, saith the Apostle, " be- " cause it worketh no ill to his neighbour." VOL. II. O 196 May we not, with equal force and justice, rea- son thus, Love thinketh all good of his neigh- bour, and worketh all good to his neighbour, therefore is Christian love the appropriate bond of private friendship ?— Consider, my fellow Christians, what must be the character, which the principles of the Gospel must necessarily form ; what must be the moral description of the sincere Christian. Humble, yet independ- ant ; meek, yet fearless of man ; frugal, yet generous ; parsimonious, yet incorruptible ; anxious for the esteem, and even the praise of virtue, and yet unostentatious ; influenced by a principle, which is patient, and kind, and de- void of envy, free from rashness, and pride, and indelicacy, and selfishness, a principle, which is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil, rejoiceth not in iniquity, seeketh not in the comparative iniquity of others for self-gratulation, but re- joiceth in the truth and power of God to renew a right spirit within them, a principle, which endues us with fortitude, and fidelity, confi- dence, and perseverance ; a principle which ne- ver faileth. I have been almost quoting the Apostle's description of Christian love ; is not every feature of it such as friendship would re- quire in its votary ? I am aware it has been said, that the cultiva- tion of private friendship is alien from the ge- 197 neral principle of benevolence, which should result from the Gospel system. But, surely, benevolence may be general, without being un- discriminating. While we are kindly affecti- onate to all men, we may feel greater plea- sure in the society of some, than of others. Nature points out to us our parents and chil- dren, as the more peculiar objects of our affec- tion. Why may not those also, whom similarity of disposition, and habitual interchange of kindness, have united to us as friends, enjoy our more especial love, without weakening its ge- neral influence towards the rest of mankind ? — No, my fellow Christians, so far from weaken- ing, it strengthens it j and he, who is most af- fectionate in the domestic relations of life, and most faithful and warm in his friendship, is most likely to be tender hearted, and forbearing, and benevolent to all men.—-Our blessed Saviour did not love mankind the less, because he asso- ciated with his disciples ; he did not love his disciples the less, because he selected the Apostles ; he did not love the Apostles the less, because there was one the object of his peculiar affection. — Shall we then say, when our Re- deemer has left us an example of private friend- ship, when his entire discipline most eminently fits us for its cultivation, when it is as it were the cradle, the cherish ei', of Christian love, 198 shall we say, that it is not most consonant to the spirit of the Gospel ? What must the influence, the salutary influ- ence, of Christian friends be on each other ! It is in some respects greater than that of parents over their children, for, while, like that, it rests on precept and example, the precepts of friendship are more attended to, the example more influential ; — because there is greater si- milarity of circumstances, greater equality, whether of capability of exertion, or of power of resistance. — Strong as is our conviction, that the advice of our parents proceeds from love, still more firmly are we persuaded, that the counsels of our friends can proceed from no other principle. They better know on what springs of action to ground it, at what time to offer it. — Their opportunities are more fre- quent. — Reserve and fear are absent ; while the anxiety, the reciprocal anxiety, for the eter- nal welfare of each other almost equalises the bond of friendship to that of nature, and, while it consecrates it to the service of God, gives vigilance to its care, and energy to its exer- tions. Every proof of affection encreases the power of its influence. When the Christian cautions his friend against temptation, he not only saves his brother, but also adds to his own power of resistance, ensures for himself some I 199 future victory. — When he incites his friend to acts of good will to mankind, he, at the same time, fans the sacred fire in his own bosom. The counsels of friendship are like mercy, bles- sing both the giver, and the receiver ; and where two or three are gathered together in Christian friendship, the blessing of God is on them, and their Redeemer is in the midst of them they are beautiful in their lives, and in their deaths they are not divided. Contrast with this the friendship of the world ; that friendship, on which you must repose your affections, if you have not preoccupied your hearts with that which is better. — Contrast with this the unstable, the deceitful, the destruc- tive, connection between those, whose affec- tions religion has not corrected, has not regu- lated, has not purified ; — their mutual follies reciprocally encouraging and encreasing each other, or perhaps the weakness of one becom- ing the dupe of the interested cunning of his companion. Reversing every feature of Christian love, the spirit, which is of this world, is impatient, unkind, and envious, vaunteth itself, is easily puffed up, behaveth itself unseemly, taketh pleasure in the iniquity of some, and rejoiceth over the iniquity of others, seeketh her own, her own exclusively, and more than her own> 200 thinketh evil continually, and is most easily provoked. The hollow, the visionary friend- ship, which such a spirit entertains is subser- vient to every vice, bows to every passion, and yields to every breath of selfishness. — To day the friends are countenancing each other in folly and in sin, to-morrow, like the cup of sensuality, which they had shared, their friend- ship is turned to loathing. — They part for ever, to seek new friends, on whom they may confer the ruin of their intimacy. — Or, perhaps, an eternal union is their lot. — That spirit, which is puffed up, and thinketh evil, is also easily provoked, — Pride leads them from drunkenness, or debate, or deceit, to malignity and murder. — Behold the friends of yesterday on the field as rival duellists. — They die by each others hands. — Die have I said ?— Death protracted, eternal, misery unspeakable, infinite, and everlasting, — agony beyond the power of sense to picture, beyond the stretch of imagination to limit, have they drawn on each other.— Sure- ly, in the eyes of God, this friendship of the world is the bitterest enmity. But you will say, this seldom happens. — True, for it is but one of the fruits of worldly friendship. Shall I describe to you more of them ? How many a ruined family, an aban- donment of character and of principle, a wreck- 201 ed constitution, and a broken heart, may be traced, may be clearly traced, to friendships with the irreligious ! — Contrast with these, the love, the peace, the joy, of Christian friend- ships ; — and be assured, that you must choose between them. You cannot remain unattached. You cannot close your bosoms against the en- trance of all friendship. — If you would escape the evil, you must cleave to that which is good. — May He, who is able to keep you from fal- ling, direct you in your choice. May He strengthen you to keep your heart with all dili- gence, for out of it are the issues of your life. FINIS. Princeton Theological Seminary-Sneer Library 1 1012 01012 4842