OCT 31 1968 A n Digitized by tine Internet Arcliive in 2015 https://arcliive.org/details/bretlirensencycloOOcliur \ OC'i 30 1952 CONTAIN ING Tlie United Counsels and Conclusions of tlie Bretliren, AT T II E 1 B. ANNUAL MEETINC^H, CAREFULLY COLLECTED, TRAXSLATED (FROM THE ORIGINAF GERMAX IX PART) AND ARRAXGED IX ALPHABETICAL AND CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER, ACCOMPANIED WITH NECESSARY AND EXPLANATORY NOTES, ELDER HENRY KURTZ. COPYRIGHT SECUKED. PUBLISHED BY THE AUTHOR, AT COLUMBIANA, OHIO. Printed by W. S. Haven, cor. Wood and Third Sis., PiHsburgh. 1 80 7. Entered, aooording to the Act of Congress, in t)ie year 18C", BY 'V. S. HAVEN, In the aerk's OflSee of the Piftrict Court of the United State? for the Western Dif=tr!r-t of Pennsylvania. INTRODUCTORY ADDRESS. Beloved Brethren in tue Lord : — It is with tlie deepest feelings of gratitude to God, who has been pleased in mercy to spare my unprofitahlc life, and to enable me, though under severe afflictions, to pass this work through the press thus fai-. It is also with feelings of deep humility and self abasement, when I consider the object I had in view originally, namely, to put into the hands of my brethren of the present generatioti those words of peace and union which had been concluded upon by our beloved brethren of past generations under their own trials and difficulties, for our present uud future benefit and instruction ; and, on the other hand, perceive my imper- fections and shortcomings in a great many ways. It was but a very humble task to be merely the interpreter of sayings of old, and I must confess my aim was a little higher; that is to say, to. furnish my dearly beloved brethren, in the "Encyclo- pedia," a handbook to be consulted on any point or cpiestion that might occur to any conscientious brother in his jirivatc life, or to any church in her dealings with individual mem- bers, though it had not been presented or decided at a Yearly Council hitherto; but continued ill health prevented much scrutiny and revision, and so there was left out much which had been intended for insertion, and some few things may have slipped in which ought to have been left out, and for these things he earnestly pleads for indulgence and pardon of the dear reader. A few' words of exi)lanation and caution seem to be ne- cessary to those who will use this little collection of the united counsels and conclusions of our Annual Meetings, since there are different opinions about them even among brethren. Some perhaps esteem them somewhat too highly, taking them iv. as rules and laws of equal authority as divine writ, and which, like the I*ersian laws, could not be altered. Others again put perhaps a too low estimate upon them, considering them as a l)undle of human traditions, as they are sometimes called as "tradiiions of elders," which we cannot too soon forget and lay aside, because, they think, they conflict with and are con- trary to the word of God, as it is written. They object, Avhen reference is made to these conclusions, and would have rather consigned them to destruction for fear they might obtain an undue influence. We honor both these opinions, for we believe, they arc founded upon well intended, though per- haps mistaken views ; at any rate we cannot take sides consci- entiously with cither of these two classes, and beg leave to lay here before our respected readers, whether they have belonged to either of said two classes, or whether they have like us occupied an impartial position, a few of our REFLECTIONS upon the subject, and we hope all will give them a fair and candid consideration, they being the result of u research at once deep and earnest for riearl}' forty years. 1. The fundamental principles of the Brethren, whether they lived in apostolic times eighteen hundred years ago, or in the Middle Ages^ during the prevailing darkness of a cor- rupted church without a Bible, or since the Reformation and the art of Printing had given the Bible to gvery one who felt a desire for it, was, to take the pure word of God, and that alone, as the infallible rule of their faith and practice. 2. Guided by this principle, they rejected every form of doctrine, every practice, every custom and ordinance contrary to that divine and infallible rule, and united as a church with the sincere object to follow the apostles' converts on Pentecost : •■ to continue steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine andfellowshi]), >fe." Acts 2:42. o. ]>ut, as in the days of the apostles, there arose teachers who began to teach a difierent doctrine, and thus caused con- tusion and difliculties, we are informed how the apostles labored for union, and the Brethren even in our days have tried to follow their example, especially in our Yearly Meet- ings. 4. Xow in any question that is presented, if there is an ex- press word of God found to cover and decide this question, of course we would do very wrong to call such a decision a human tradition. 5. However, there also may be raised questions to which the word of God affords no direct answer. If they are mere matters of opinion, not inconsistent with true faith and moral- ity, brotherly love will be liberal and forbearing, without in- sisting on others to be of our opinion. Bat if the expression of my opinions is offensive to others, brotherly affection, humility and prudence will teach me at once, at least not to give offensa, and consequently to withhold the utterance of offensive opinions. 6. But if questions are of a practical natui*e, and as we are to be of one mind, and co-workers together, it becomes neces- sary to agree, "that there be no divisions among you;" and suppose the word of God, and especially the ISTew Testament, is silent on the subject, but the brethren have come to a unani- mous agreement in the matter, all one whether it was yester- day or a hundred years ago, by brethren representing the whole fraternity in Yearly Meeting, then such agreement is binding upon all, as the contract of a parent or of a duly authorized agent or attorney is binding upon the children or parties, their heirs and assigns, until it is either fultilled or lawfully can- celled or recalled. 7. In this light, brethren, let us look upon the counsels and conclusions as solemn agreements or covenants upon which our fathers brake annually the bread of communion, and con- sidered them as bonds of love, to bind them together in union of the spirit, so as " to be perfectly joined together in the same mind, and in the same judgment;" and on the other hand, they considered those who would act contrary to these articles of agreement as disturbers of the peace of the church, and covenant breakers, whom they could not fellov/ship, unless they repented indeed. Such, my beloved brethren in the Lord, are our simple views of the Minutes of our Yearly Meeting. They are not laws and rules made and enacted b}- some legislative autboritv for the government of others, because we believe Christ to be our onlv legislator and law2;ivcr, and his laws, contained in vi. the N"evv Testament, are perfect laws, needing neither addition nor amendments, but nothing more than to be properly understood and faithfully applied. Oh, my brethren beloved, let us thank God daily for that perfect law of Christ, which we have, and let us try to be as faithful, as our brethren in times past tried to be faithful, in examining and obeying that perfect hxw, and setting forth in those Minutes a practical comment of this same law — the New Testament. Neither can we, call those Minutes mere traditions of men, in the sense of vain traditions, which the Saviour condemned, because Ihey, the Pharisees, "transgressed the command- ments of God by their traditions." Having said something on the subject of " Traditions" in the body of this work, we refrain from saying more here, and refer the dear reader to that article on page 179, and reference is thei*e made to 2 Thess. 2:15, and 3:6, and 1 Cor. 11:2, where the observ- ance of a difierent kind of traditions is earnestly recommend- ed not only, but strongly inculcated and commanded. Let us, dear brethren, properly distinguish between traditions of Pharisaic Elders, which would make void the law ot God, and between traditions of our Christian Elders, which only tend to the more perfect obedience of the law of Christ; prove all things by that law, and we will not be led astray by tra- ditions. Having said here what our Minutes, given in this work, are not; that is, neither laws, nor vain traditions, we may be asked again, what they really are in our humble estimation ; and though we have intimated already more than once what we understood by them, we will try once more to elucidate and illustrate our simple ideas more fully. As in a judicial court there ar6 judges, lawyers, the contending parties, the witnesses, and all the people that choose to attend, yet none of these parties, or all together, can bring in a verdict, but the twelve men specially selected, and called the Jury ; so in the church of Christ none but those wl.o are deemed to be impartial (we think,) will be able to give a true "Verdict," and such we deem the conclusions of our Yearly Meetings. Or, as when parties make an agreement, by which they are mutually bound to perform certain express conditions, not only they, but their heirs and assigns, are bound to observe tlie conditions in order to enjoy its benefits — so in the cluirch of Christ, the brethren in Yearly Meeting assembled, agree- ing on any point, bind not only tbemselves, but those wbo sent them, nntil released in the same manner. Or, as parties who have been at war with each other, in order to bring about a reconciliation, a treaty of peace is drawn, and signed, and confirmed, in which the conditions to be observed by each party are stated ; — so when a party in the church of Christ has become estranged, and desires reconciliation, in such case the terms might be called a treaty of peace, as in the former case an agreement. In fact, we may say, every Yearly Meeting was a solemn act of renewing our covenant, into which each one of us had entered, when we made a public confession of our faith, renouncing Satan, the world, and all its sipful ways, and covenanting with God to be faithful even to the end, at our baptism in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy (ihost. This covenant is renewed in every communion we attend, and, as to the whole body of the church, was renewed at every Annual Meeting by the articles agreed on, signed and sealed under the most solemn sanction of the divine presence, which had been sought by the most humble prayer of all the faithful, and by the influence of the Holy Spirit had again become united and "joined together in the same mind, and in the same judgment," — and by celebrating a lovefeast, and partaking of the emblems of a Saviour's dying love, fear, and every erroneous, dividing and sinful sentiment was cast out by perfect love in every pious heart present. Would to God this latter feature of our Annual Meetings was restored again in these our days ! ! Finally, brethren, after cautioning you thus to prove all things by the infallible test of the word of God, and asking pardon for anything amiss in this work, owing to oar own shortsightedness or shortcoming, and particularly for not having been able to give at this time the "Appendix" often referred to in this work, on account of continued failing- health (and even not beisg able to promise any thing further than this, that if the Lord would please to restore to us such a measure of health, that we could revise this work, and " set in order the things that are wanting" in this respect, we would with His help try to do so, and if possible without viii. further expense to our subscribers) ; feeling every day more sensibly our approach to our dissolution, and we hope and trust to that home which our Saviour has prepared for us, scarcely hoping to see our beloved brethren any more in the flesh, that live away at au}^ distance, but still rejoicing in the lively hope of once meeting where there shall be no parting any more forever, — with all these solemn feelings and im- pressions we bid our readers the kindest "Farewell." May the Lord, his wisdom and love be with us all. Amen. ■\Vrlttcn in June, 186(. THE BRETHREN'S ENCYCLOPEDIA. ACKNOWLEDGMENT, or confession in case of a member commit- ting a public fault or ofience. The discrin-.ination between a public fault or offence and a public crime, is not as distinctly stated in the following cases as might be desirable, but prob- ably will be in their proper place. At the yearly meeting on Blackwater, Va., in 1797, " it was concluded in union, that when a brother or sister should commit a fault which was not between brother and brother, but public before the world, the church is to investigate the case, and if the fault was not so criminal as to com- pel the church to cut him off entirely, according to the word of the Lord, and the failing member sees it and is sorry for his sin, then he should make a public acknowledgment in the presence of the believers and the unbelieving. But if he should harden his heart, and would not obey the counsel of the church, then members could not have communion with such until the time when he becomes willing to acknowledge and to obey." At the yearly meeting in Morrison's Cove, 1S25, the question was pre- sented, " In case members commit a public fault for which an acknowledg- ment is required, should it be made publicly, or only before the church? It was considered, in case the transgression was made without the ch;irch, and is deemed by the world a fault, and the transgressor should feel in himself urged to it (to make a public confession), in such case it might be good ; but if it should be something that is not deemed a transgres- sion by the world, and the conviction were not truly born from within or from the heart, then it would be no light before the world, and it would be better done before the membership." At the Y. M. 1844, the following query came up, and was answered as follows: "Art 12. How is it considered, if a member makes an open transgression, and refuses to come before the church to acknowledge it, though he declares his willingness to make acknowledgment before some brethren ? It was considered, that such private confession could not be deemed sufficient, since the word says, 1 Tim. 5 : 20, * Them that sin, rebuke before all, that others also may fear.' " 1 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT. We cannot refrain from inserting the following letter treating on the same subject : Rockingham, Va., March 6, 1833. * * * " Now to come to your questions, whether we might require of a member an acknowledgment in public meeting according to the gospel and the Brethren's order ? According to the old Brethren's order as they kept house forty years ago, we might do so, but since we were help- ing to keep house, we have not required so much of a member, because we have no plain word in the Scripture for it. Paul says, 1 Tim. 5 : 20, ' Them that sin, rebuke before all, that others also may fear.' This is a good evidence for a public rebuke before the whole membership, and further we cannot under.stand it. We read in Numbers 5: 6, 'When a man or woman shall commit any sin that men commit, to do a trespass against the Lord, and that person be guilty, then they shall confess their sin which they have done, and he shall recompense his trespass, &c.' And Lev. 6 : 5 we find, ' that he had to make restoration first, and then to bring his trespass-oficring unto the priest, and the priest had to make an atonement for him before the Lord.' Now says Paul, ' Whatsoever things were written aforetime, were written for our learning;' and again it is said, ' If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.' Rom. 12 : 18, and 15 : 4. Again, * Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord.' Heb. 12 : 14. ' Now it seems to be quite plain, that when a brother commits a fault, or wrongs his neighbor, whether he is a member or not, he should first go with some brethren to the one he ofiended, and be reconciled with him, and then come to the church, and bring his trespass-offering, such as David says, Psalms 51 : 17, ' The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit; a broken and a contrite heart, 0 God, thou wilt not despise ;' that is, a re- penting and humble heart he should bring to the church, and then the church can forgive him, as the Saviour had said to his disciples, John 20 : 23, ' Whosesoever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them ; and whosesoever sins ye retain, they are retained.' Now we must believe that the Saviour meant here the church, as he said to Peter, Matt. 16 : 18, ' Upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven ; and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven ; and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.' This key is what we read of in Matt. 18 : 17, 'If he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as an heathen man and a publican.' How- ever, we have to be very careful to do to any one neither too much nor too little. In Matt. 23 : 23, the Saviour accuses the Pharisees to have 'omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy and faith.' Now we read in Lev. 5:5, ' If a soul has sinned, thou£;h not against his fellow man, he shall confess that he has sinned, and shall bring his trespass-ofi'ering unto the priest (v. 8); and the priest shall make an ADMITTING STRANGERS. 3 atonement for him, &c.' (v. 10.) From this we learn that when a member has oflFended against God and the truth, it is his duty to come to the church, &c.; for Peter says to the believers, ' Ye are a royal priesthood (1 Peter 2:9); and Paul says, ' If I forgave anything, I forgave it in the person of Christ.' From this it is very clear, that when a church is keeping house right carefully, and upon true contrition and confession forgives a member, such will also be reconciled through Christ, the true High-priest, before God the heavenly Father. But if a member were not truly repenting, it might be as we read, Lev. 13 : 28, that when the priest had pronounced one dean, and it had still continued to spread, then the priest had still to pronounce him unclean, because it was lepro- sy. Just so it may happen with a member ; if he would continue in his old sinful course, the church would be compelled at last to put him with- out the camp, as the children of Israel had to do with all the leprous, else the whole church might fall into guilt. The Saviour says, Lake 12 : 42, ' Who then is that faithful and wise steward, whom his lord shall make ruler over his household, to give them their portion of meat in due season ?' Let this suffice on this point." Two remarks we feel to make before w° close this article. First. When we compare the above counsels carefully, we find that our brethren always endeavor- ed to understand and carry out the word and will of God, according to the best light they had at the time; and so far from following blindly the views of their forefathers, as we are sometimes accused, they thought and acted for themselves, and felt free to pursue another course, if it seemed to them more in consonance with the word of God. Our second remark is, that perhaps it would be desirable by some, that our old brethren should have clearly defined what kind of sins can be remitted by the church upon an acknowledgment or confession, and which could not be re- mitted, or rather must be retained, according to John 20 : 23. From this very passage it is plainly to be seen that there are some sins which can be remitted upon a confession or acknowledgment, and again other sins which the church cannot remit, but must retain even when confessed or acknowledged ; but we must look elsewhere in the word of God for instructions about those different sins. To that word of God our old brethren always referred us, and in it they believed we could find all the necessary light and instruction for keeping house in the church of God. They pointed us to Matt. 18 : 15-18, as the divine rule for deal- ing with simple trespassers, and to 1 Cor. 5, as containing the law for those who had committed crimes, though at first in their simplicity they did not discrimi- nate so fully between the two ordinances, and dealt with transgressors of the first class as rigorously as with those of tbe second. Finally, let it be observed, that no bare acknowledgment or confession of hnv- ing done wrong would be deemed sufficient, unless it was acf ompanied by a will- ingness to repair that wrong to the extent of our ability, or at least as far as the church may require of us. ADMITTING STRANGERS (not members) to our church councils. It would seem necessary to say a few words in explanation to those who may read the following, not being fully acquainted with our peculiarities. In most denominations a church council meeting means only the meeting of the church officers for the transaction of the church business. In such meetings no one, even no private member of the same church, is admitted, or will ask admittance without being specially invited. But the case is different with us. It is not only the privilege, but also the duty of every member to attend church council, whether official or private, male or female, and to assist in transacting business. Friends, seeing our members going to meeting, and being at leisure, may come also by mistake, expecting preaching. Husbands, whose wives are members, 4 ADMITTING STRANGE MINISTERS— TESTIMONY. maybe induced by kindness to convey and accompany their companions to meet- ing, even if they are informed of its peculiar character. Some may come moved by curiosity or other motives, but all feel more or less mortified and offended when requested to withdraw. The reluctance of brethren to give that of- fence was the origin of the query following, we suppose. At the yearly meeting in Ohio, 1822, the question was presented, whether such as were not members could be present in our church- councils, and the answer was, " Considered, as it was at all times consid- ered, that it could not be allowed." At the special yearly meeting in Indiana, 1845, question 6 was, ' ■ Whether in a council meeting of the church the gospel will allow such as are no members to be admitted V and the answer was, Considered, that inasmuch as our Saviour directs us. Matt. 18, the course we are to take with an offending brother, to tell it in the last step unto (he church, it seemed to be obvious by (or in) the gospel, that those who do not be- long tg the church ought not to be in council. ADMITTING STRANGE MINISTERS (not brethren, but from other denominations,) to preach in our meetings. At a special meeting in Tennessee, 1846, query 5 was, " Whether we should give liberty to preachers of other denominations to speak in our stated meetings ? Considered, that it could not be allowed according to the gospel. See John's 2d Epistle, verses 9 and 10." At the Y. M. 1849. Art 18. reads thus : "Whether it is advisable to give preachers of other denominations privilege to speak at our regularly appointed meetings ? The answer was, Considered, it is not advisable." ADMITTING TESTIMONY from strangers or outsiders. Y. M. 1841. Art. 6. " Whether members may be brought before the council of the church, and be judged for a crime, only on testimony from without, i. e. from persons that are not members of the church ? Answer. Considered, that when there is some report abroad of a brother walking disorderly, or having committed a crime, it is the duty of the church to send some brethren to the place where the report has originated, to in- vestigate the matter. If noffcing be. found establishing the charge, and the (accused) member denying the same after a close examination, no- thing more can be done. However, if there should be created some suspicion in the members by the general conduct of the accused, the church may advise such a member not to approach the Lord's table until the matter is cleared up to the satisfaction of the church. But to dis- own entirely a member on testimony only from without, was not consid- ered right and just according to the .gospel." Y. M. 1845. Art. 9. How is it considered, if brethren are accused by the mouths of two or three witnesses of honest, moral character, but not being members, and their testimony against those members agrees, that they were guilty of drunkenness or any other crime, and the church ADULTERY. 5 has cause to believe such testimony from other circumstances, but the brethren so accused deny the, charge ? Considered, as in the year 1841, Art. 6, that such members might be advised not to approach the Lord's table until the matter is cleared up to the satisfaction of the church ; but to judge a brother on testimony from without alone, and without his own confession, would not be just, according to the gospel. ADULTERY. By Ibis word the Brethren, understand not only those gross acts of violation of the marriage vow, which even the world condemns, but also those acts as de- fined by our Saviour in Matt. 19 : 9, Luke IG : 18, &c. Y. M. 1797. The case Avas presented of married people separating from one another, and then the one party marrying again, thus commit- ting adultery. Afterward the other party also marries again, and then the latter comes to the church, and desires to be received by baptism as a member in the church, and it was considered, that if the chu£ch was agreed, and the applicant should heartily repent, confess and acknow- ledge the fault (and especially if the first companion would be dead by this time), we might include such person within the (bounds of the) mercy and merits of Jesus, and receive as a member by baptism. Y. 31. 1812. Another case was presented of a woman who was de- serted by her husband, and after being informed that he was dead, she married again; but the information proved to be untrue; her first husband made his appearance again, but without calling or claiming her he went away the second time, and now he is said again to be dead, and she (the woman) now makes application to be received into the church. The brethren decided that it could not be done according to the word of God_ until there is evidence that her first husband be dead, and then only she might be received upon true repentance and confession. Y. M. 1819. In a similar case of a woman marrying a man who had left his wife, both were considered adulterers while that first wife lives, according to the declaration of the Apostle Paul, Rom. 7 : 2, 3 ; and that the church could not receive them as members, until the first mar- riage was dissolved by death, and then only upon heartfelt sorrow and repentance. But if those who are in suA condition would for the sake of God (and their salvation) firmly resolve, and actually (endeavor to) live separate (and apart from each other), with godly sorrow for their for- mer transgression, they might find grace and be reconciled with God (through Christ). Special Y. M. Miami, 1822. Art. 7. With regard to persons who live in adultery, it was considered, that they could not be received into the church as long as they live in such condition. Y. M. 1842. Art. 8. " Whether a person, who was married, and whose partner broke the marriage vow by fornication, may marry again according to the gospel, after obtaining a bill of divorce '! Considered, that according to the word of God (Matt. 5 : 31, 32, and 19 : 3-10 ; Mark 6 ADULTERY. 10 : 2-12 ; Luke 16 : IS, and 1st Cor. 7 : 10, 11, 39), a person cannot n;arry again while the first companion lives, and that the gospel consid- ers (declares) not only the person that would marry again after heing divorced, Lut also the person who would marry the divorced party, as adulterers." Y. M. 1850. Art. 12. In a similar case it was " considered, that such persons should not he received in the church under such circumstances, and that the brethren who received them have erred, and should make ac- knowledgments before the church in order to the reconciliation of the brethren who have been grieved at (by) their proceedings." Y. M. 1856. Art. 18. " How are we to hold a brother and sister, who lived together for some years in lawful matrimony, but not very agreea- bly, and now they are separated, the brother being with his children in Iowa, and the sister with her friends in Ohio ? Answer. — The church, or churches, where such members lived, should investigate the matter, and judge according to the gospel and the circumstances or facts in the case, in the fear of the Lord." Same Y. M. Art. 24. " If a man shall put away his wife for the cause of fornication, procuring a bill of divorcement and marrying another, has he committed the sin of adultery, or could he be received into the church, all the parties still living, if he in all other respects brings forth fruits meet for repentance ? Referred to next yearly meeting.'' Y. M. 1857. Art. 8. " The 24th query on the minutes of 1856 being ■brought forward (again), it was concluded best for such churches as have occasion to act on such cases, to act in the fear of the Lord, according to their knowledge of the cases (and of course, according to the word of the Lord)." Y. M. 1858. Art. 7. " What is to be done, when a man has put away his wife for the cause of adultery, and obtaining a bill of divorcement, marries again ; the churdh not knowing of this, nor he that the church disallows of such, for some two years after he has become a member '{ Answer. — We have not light enough at present to give any advice dif- ferent from what the brethren have formerly given." Same Y. M. Art. 46. " Shbuld the church receive a person that has been living in a state of matrimony awhile and apparently did not live in peace, then leaving his companion gets married to another one, and after some time leaving the second one for the same reason he left the first, and while his first companion was yet living ? Considered, that according to the gospel such a person should not be received into the church." Y. M. 1859. Art. 17. " A man's wife leaves him for no just cause, and she then obtains a bill of divorcement ; after this she marries an- other man. And then in consequence of this the (first) husband (thus) left and divorced (by the action of his wife), also marries another woman after some time, with whom he is living. And he having become con- ADVANCING BRETHREN. 7 vinced of the truth, has made applicatioa for baptism. Can he be re- ceived into the church ? Answer. — We think he cannot while living with the last woman as a husband. See 1st Cor. 7 ; 10, 11." Same Y. M. Art. 21. " A man marries his uncle's wife (widow), but afterward thinks he discovers it forbidden in Lev. 18 : 14, and 20 : 20, and separates from her. He then marries another woman. He now de- sires to hi received into the church. Can he be received, as the first woman is still living, and in a married connection with another man ? Answer. — According to the civil law the first marriage would be consid- ered lawful, and, consequently, the second marriage is contrary to the gospel, and he cannot therefore be received into the church by baptism while he and the woman with whom he is living are living together in the relation of man and wife." Y. 31. 1862. Art. 3. If a sister is married to a man, who, after living with her awhile, leaves her, and she, not hearing from him for several years, marries again, can she be held as a member ? Answer. — No; she could not be held as a member. Same Y. M. Art. 28. " Can the church hold in fellowship persons living as husband and wife, while the husband's former wife is still liv- ing, from whom he was divorced, but not for the cause of fornication ? Answer. — We consider, according to Matt. 19: 0, that the church cannot hold such in fellowship." ADVANCING BRETHREN IN THE MINISTKY — (see also the articles of " Choice for Minkters" and " Ministers," &c.) As our Saviour, when he deemed it necessary and expedient to call men to his assistance for the worli he came from heaven to accomplish, did not go to Jetu- s«lem, to the schools of those learned iu the law, nor to the sect-i of the Bad- d'.icees or Pharisees, but made his selection from among his own follower.^;; so it is a settled principle among the Brethren, when in any particular church the want of assistance in the ministry is felt, not to go to any high school, university or theological seminary, or even outside of that particular church, but there, from among themselves, under the counsel and direction of experienced elders, and more particularly under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, make a selection. And as Christ did not all at once entrust his disciples with the full powers of the min- istry, but kept them for years under his own personal direction and instruction, more as disciples and learners than as teachers, so the Brethren try to follow his example, laying no greater burden on their newly elected ministers than they cau bear, who perhaps before their election had never thought of such a thing. Hence such bre;hreu are simply entrusted with the word, and if they, after a shorter or longer trial, have proved themselves humble, faithlul and useful, they are, by counsel of the church, advanced to the administration of the holy ordi- nances of the Lord. And if in course of time the elder ministers have been re- moved, such of the second degree may be advanced by the unanimous voice of the church, and may take their places as rulers and overseers of the flock. Y. M. 1848. Art 7. How to make arrangements that in every church brethren be authorized to baptize and serve at communion tables ? Con- sidered, to leave it to the judgment of the churches, with the advice of neighboring ordained elders, whether they think it necessary and expe- dient. Y. M. 1850. Art. 19. Whether it would be agreeable to the order ot 8 ALMS COLLECTINa. tlio cliurcli, where there is a bishop and two or rcore teaching brethren in one arm of the church, to elect a (second) bishop without the consent of tlie churcli '{ Considered necessary by all means to have the voice (and consent) of the church in such cases. Y. M. 1856. Art. 20. Is it the rule and order among the Brethren to forward a brother to baptize at the same time he is put into the minis- try ? Answer. — No. Y. M. 1858. Art. 19. What is the ancient and established order of the Brethren in advancing speakers to the second degree of office ? Are they received with hand and kiss ? Considered, that the proper way is to receive them with hand and kiss. ALMS COLLECTL\G. Y. M. 1788. Resolved unanimously, that hereafter no member of the church, whether brother or sister, under no pretext whatever, should go from church to church, or from house to house, to collect alms ; but where there is any want or distress of a member (greater than the church to which he or she belongs is able to relieve), the church shall state the case in writing, and send it to the next church, if necessary by the member himself, and if in that church full relief could not be obtained, the writing should be renewed until relief is accomplished, if even it were necessary to call upon all the churches. And we deem it proper that every church should state on the writing how much is yet lacking. Y. M. 1793. Inasmuch as God has commanded his ancient people Israel by Closes, and said, " There shall be no beggar among you (Ger- man translation), for the Lord shall greatly bless thee in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee for an inheritance to possess it, &c." Deut. 15 : 4. And says further, " If there be among you a poor man of thy brethren within any of thy gates in thy land which the Lord thy God giveth thee, thou shall not harden thy heart, nor shut thy hand from thy poor brother. But thou shalt open thy hand wide unto him, and shall surely lend him sufficient for his need, in that which he wanteth." And says again, " Beware that there be not a thought in thy wicked heart, saying, &c. Thou shalt freely give him, and thy heart shall not be grieved when thou givest unto him ; because that for this thing the Lord thy God shall bless thee in all thy works, and in all thou puttest thy hand unto." And again says, "For the poor shall never cease out of the land ; therefore I command thee, saying. Thou shalt open thy hand wide unto thy brother, to thy poor, and to thy needy, in thy land, &c." Deut. 15 ; 7-11. And the Apostle James says, " Hearken, my beloved brethren, hath not God chosen the poor of this world rich in faith, and heirs of the kingdom, &c." James 2 : 5. And inasmuch it has happen- ed by bad people, that such as were actually poor have been robbed of their gifts by men going about and pretending to be Brethren, have asked assistance, which they have afterward spent in taverns by drinking and ANNUAL MEETING. 9 gambling, now in order to prevent such deception, some years ago at a large meeting in Conestoga it was resolved unanimously, that hereafter no member should go from church to church, or from house to house, to collect alms, &C. And inasmuch as members have been imposed upon since in a deceitful manner, therefore, we have concluded again in this present great meeting unanimously, that hereafter no member shall be allowed to go himself to another church, but if there should be found a member in want or distress, the overseer in the church where such member lives is to hold counsel with the church in order to see whether they would re- lieve the want, and if so, it should not go any further. But if not, then the overseer, with the counsel of the church, should send a letter to the adjoining church with a brother of his church, and if there the want can be relieved it shall go no further. But if the want is not redressed then according to the finding of that church, it should be proceeded in the same manner from that to the next church, until relief is obtained, so that our loving brethren and members, who, according to the doctrine of Paul, are willing to do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith (Gal. 6 : 10), may no longer be imposed upon in such deceitful manner. This is not to be understood that we should not do good also to those poor without the church, &c. Y. M. 1852. Art. 18. " Whether members have a right by the gospel to go begging for money through the ditferent churches ? Considered, that they have no right according to the gospel, and where there are poor members that are in a suffering condition, it is the duty of the church in which they live to see to it, and to supply their wants ; and if that church is not able to support them, the church has a right to apply to the neighboring churches for help, and not the brother that is in want. ANNUAL MEETING. This is an ancient institution, almost as old as our brotherhood in this our land America, though not exactly under that name ; or rather, more correctly speak- ing, it is an institution as ancient as the gospel. It is a peculiar institution, not at all like the synods, conferences, ecclesiastical associations, assemblies or con- ventions of the present day among the various denominations of Christian pro- fessors. It is a highly prized and cherished institution in o\ir brotherhood, as a re- Ui^ioQ not only of ministers and official members, but of the church at large, open to all the brethren and sisters who feel disposed and able to attend it. Hence multitudes from far and near, not only of members but also of outsiders, come together on such occasions. This latter feature threatening to defeat its original object, has been the frequent suV)ject of thought and reflection of earnest and sober minded brethren, and has also been the cause of some changes in con- ducting the same, heretofore adopted, and still contemplated for the immediate futiire. SCRIPTURAL FOUNDATION OF THE CHURCH AND HER AUTHORITY. When our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ had asked his disciples, Mat-. 16 : 13 -20, " Whom do men say that I, the Son of man, am?" they said. Some (say that thou art) .John the Baptist; some, Elias; and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets." "He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am. And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ (.Messiah), the Son of the living God. And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou Simon Bar-jona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven. And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter (Greek, petros): and upon 10 ANNUAL MEETING. this rock (Greek, ^eira, i. e. not the man, but that confession made,) I will bnild my church ; and the gates of bell shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee (ihe disciples, or the church as a unity) the keys of the kingdom of heaven : and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earih shall be bound in heaven ; and whatsoever thou shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." That this authority was given to the church and not to the individual, is fur- ther evident from the express words of our Saviour on another occasion. Matt. 18 : 15-18, where he gives direction how a brother is to deal with his brother in case of a private trespass against him personally, and says at last, "Tell it unto THE CHURCH !" and adds presendy after, "Whatsoever ye (as forming the church) shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." How this authority was exercised not only toward private members, but also toward the ministers, and the apostles themselves, even Pet^r, when any thing was done that needed explanation and seemed to some wrong, we find an exam- ple, Acts 11 : 3. (Please read all from the beginning of the chapter to v. 18.) But the example related Acts 15 : l-3:i, appeared to our ancient brethren as the main foundation for holding such general councils or annual meetings, and this apostolic example was their avowed pattern; see hereafter, Y. M. 1837, Art. 3. THE ORIGIN OF ANNUAL MEETINGS. From our forthcoming History of the Brethren in America, which shall be published as soon as possible, if the Lord will spare us yet so long, we will find that the first cr mpany of our Brethren, having arrived in IV 19, almost 150 years ago, held ih^'n first love feast in Germantown, Pa., on Chris'mas-day, December 25, 1723, and previous to this, we are informed, " they had important woik. They remembered difficulties, which had occurred in Crefeld (Germany; already. They were indeed a branch of a churchy but not yet a church (sulRciently orgacized and established) that could assume (the authority) to administer the sacraments (ordi- nances). But the chief difficulty was, that there weie still differences among them- selves, and they only of lale had commenced to come together. After all these difficul- ties had been worked through in the spirit, th y at last agreed to gratify them (the new converts, who desired baptism and being received into fellowship, and also to hold the love feast)." So then we have a record not only of t'le first church visit, the first meeting for public worship, the first baptism and the first love feast, but also of the first council meeting, and in fact the first general council or yearly meeting ever held in this country; and it is presumable that the love feasts were connected and j)receded by such council meetings the day before love feast, and that these council meetings being attended by members and ministers from every church, were sufficient for every purpose during the first thirty or forty ye.irs, while the churches were confined at first within a territory bordered only by the Delaware river on the east and the Schuylkill on the west, and at a later date by the Susquehanna on the west. But as the churches multiplied, and extended into New Jersey on the east and beyond the Susquehanna on the west, and even into Maryland, &c., and it thus becoming impracticable for all the churches to be represented at every ordinary love feast, it became a ne- cessity to set apart every year a certain time, and appoint from year to year a place for such a general council. This was done, as far as we can learn, a little after the middle of last century, and consequently a little over a hundred years ago. The first council meeting had been held, as we have seen, about Christmas, the presumed birthday of the Saviour, but now a more proper time was chosen in fixing Pentecost of every year, the birthday of the church, for the big meet- ing, as it was called even to a recent day of our own recollection. With regard to the place, it was concluded at a late day. that the big meetings should be held alternately, one year east of the Susquehanna, and the next year west of that river. The churches spreading further west and south, the Allegheny mountains were considered as the dividing line for a time in this respect, and still more re- cently the Ohio river was named as such line. HOW THE YEARLY MEETINGS WEKE HELD. That they were at first held in the most simple manner, even as our ordinary council meetings have been held up to our own times, is evident from all the testimony we could gather. Brethren met on Friday morning before Pentecost, and opened as usual by singing, exhortation, prayer, and, perhaps, reading the Scriptures. Having met in the fear of the Lord, aud invited him to preside over ANxVUAL MEETING. 11 the meeting, and prayed for the Holy Spirit to guide and direct all hearts, they considered the meeting ready for business. Cases were presented and decided, questions asked and answered, all by word of mouth, as in ordinary council meetings; there was no clerk chosen nor minute taken,, and hence it is that our records are so meagre for the first twenty-five or thirty yearly Pentecostal meet- ings. But as will be made to appear more at large in our forthcoming "History of the Brethren," when any important case or cases had been presented, it was answered afterward by letter to the church or churches that had presented them. Of these manuscript letters a goodly number yet extant have been collected with great care, and are embodied in this present work. FIRST CHANGE. When in course of time it came to pass, that among many questions also im- proper ones were asked in the presence notonly of agreat number of brethren and sisters, but also of strangers, it was counseled and concluded, that five, seven or more of the oldest ministers should, after opening the meeting, retire to a private place, where those who had questions to ask, or cases to present, might present them; while at the same time younger ministers might exercise themselves in preaching, and edily the people. This order prevailed up to our own time, as many elder brethren can testify as well as the writer. Some few of those ques- tions were privately answered, others were answered by letter to the church con- cerned, and only questions of general interest were reserved for public discussion. There were some advantages, and some disadvantages in this change, and it is hard to tell on which side was the preponderance. Before the change, we be- lieve, the council consumed but one day (Friday) in most cases ; on Saturday was public worship during the day, and in the evening love feast, and on Lord's day (Pentecost) morning solemn worship, at the close of which the whole meeting was considered ended, and the people departed to their own homes about noon. Upon the whole this first change worked well, and was a judicious one. It seems to have given general satisfaction to the church for a great number of years even up to A. D. 1830 and 1831, where the writer was an eye and ear witness; to his certain knowledge, this improved yet simple manner of holding our yearly meet- ings still prevailed. Thus far no change or extension in the time has taken place. The meeting commenced Friday morning, and broke I'p on Lord's day noon. We will try to set before our readers a simple description of what we witnessed at those two first Y. JI's. we ever attencied, among, perhaps, more than thirty such meetings at which we were present within thirty-six years past. On Friday morning at an early hour meeting commenced as usual. When worship was over, one of the oldest brethren made a brief statement, according to which it became the duty of the elders of the church where the Y. M. was held, to nominate those brethren who should receive the messages, &c., and conduct the business of the meeting. This nominating was done simply thus : the brother stepped up to what may be called the ministeis' table, and with a sweep of his hand pointed out those seated behind that table as his and the church's choice, with- out naming them, and told them to follow him to a private place. When these arose in order to retire, some one mentioned that during their absence the con- gregation might be edified by preaching, which was done by those younger min- isters who lelt disposed or were called upon to do so, one by one. until the elder brethren returned to the congregation, and business meeting was commen- ced, and continued, if necessary, till Saturday noon. Then, after dinner, public worship began again, and in the evening the great love feast and communion was held, and on Lord's day morning (Pentecost) the solemn worship of God com- menced at an early hour, and continued till noon, when the great congregation was dismissed, and dispersed after partaking of some refreshments. Thus the ordi- nary time consumed by those meetings had been only two days and a half, and if the brethren had continued in this way, many of the present difiBculties and ob- jections would have been entirely obviated. But we must close our remarks, as the many smaller and greater changes attempted afterward will be stated in the f..llowing extracts of private notes and of ordinary minutes of Y. M. Suffice it to say here, that already in 1830 and 1831 there was some talk about extending the meeting to Monday noon, in order that the Sabbath should not be desecrated by the breaking up and dispersing so large a congregation. This may seem but a small matter, but when we reflect, that adding one day. together with the care, labor and expense of providing for a multitude, making two-fifths more time, and adding another day, almost doubled the previous amount, we will all agree that it became eventually a great matter indeed. 12 ANNUAL MEETING. Y. M. 1813. "It has been also again requested of, and counseled by tlic old brethren, that the great (annual) meeting should be continued in the order as it has been heretofore declared and laid down by the old brethren, namely, that the ministers and overseers of the churches, every one in his own district and church, should in good time lay it before the church, how some should be willing to go to the big (annual) meeting, and that the church should assist them if possible, that some may be able to go, so that from all parts, and if it could be from all churches, some may come to that meeting ; and those that will come, should endeavor to arrive on Thursday evening so near to the place of meeting as to be able to be at the place Friday morning at 9 o'clock, that the business may go on without hindrance." Y. M. 1832. " Change of the time of yearly meeting. Meeting to commence on Pentecost, with public meeting and love feast. Monday and Tuesday, council meeting." Y. M. 1836. Art. 4. How is it deemed best at the yearly meeting, whether first to hold council, or first public meeting and communion ? It was considered as expedient, to commence on Lord's day with public meeting, and in the evening to break the bread of communion, and after- ward to hold counsel. Y. M. 1837. Art. 3. " How is it considered, to make a better arrange- ment in holding aunual meetings according to the pattern of the apostles (Acts 15) ? The unanimous counsel of this meeting and desire of the old brethren is, to follow the track of the apostles as closely as possible. Therefore the council meeting ought to consist of the elders and all the members of that church which receives the meeting, and of such teachers, ministers or (private) members, who may be sent as delegates from other churches. It is considered necessary, that every church, or where the distance is too great, several churches together, should send two, three or more delegates to the annual meeting. The yearly meeting is to take place as heretofore on Pentecost or Whitsuntide, and the council meeting to be held on Friday and Saturday before, to which the delegates ought to arrive in the neighborhood on Thursday evening. The public meeting to begin on Sunday, when love feast will be held, and the church is at liberty to invite thereto also neighboring churches as usual. The proceed- ings of the council meeting should be immediately recorded in writing, and as much as possible communicated to all the churches." (The minutes of this meeting were printed and published for the first time this year by order of the brethren assembled.) Y. M. 1842. Art. 5. " Whether the queries to be submitted to the yearly meeting .should not bo laid first before the individual church, and be sent with their consent ? Considered, that queries in relation to a particular church ought to be brought in with the council of that church, but a brother should not be prevented thereby to present any question that may occur to him as important and necessary to be considered." ANNUAL MEETING. 13 Y. M. 1845. Art. 13. " About the order of aDnual meetings, it was concluded to refer the consideration of his query to the next yearly meeting for the same reason as in Art. 11, and with the same recom- mendation to the consideration of all the churches." Y. M. 1846. Art. 1. " As regards the way and manner of holding annual meetings, so as to enjoy more order, convenienee and satisfaction, it was considered, in the fear of the Lord, that the counsel of the Y. M. in the -year 1837 in this respect was proper and expedient, if observed, and that the best plan will not mend the matter, if not carried out. Dif- ferent plans were proposed, and after a long discussion and mature re- flection it was reSolved to make no material change but this : that our western brethren shall have the privilege of taking the ycarlj- meeting every other year, if they request it, and that our eastern brethren should not fail to attend the same — that it should be explicity understood and given out, that on Friday and Saturday there will only be private council meeting, all the ordained elders to form the committee to take in (re- ceive) and bring before the meeting those matters to be considered. The public meeting should be on Sunday, and if possible not in the same place where the council meeting is held." Y. M. 1847. Art. 1. " Whether we could not amend our plan in holding our yearly meetings, so that the business might be conducted more quietly and orderly? Concluded in regard to our yearly meetings, that the brethren meet on Saturday before Pentecost, and have public meeting till Sunday evening. Love feast to be held either on Saturday or Sunday evening, at the option of the church where the Y. M. is held. On Monday the council meeting to begin and continue until all the busi- ness is transacted or disposed of The council to consist of delegates, not more than two to be sent from each church, with a written certificate, containing also the queries to be presented (by the church whom they represent) to the yearly meeting. The delegates to constitute a commit- tee of the whole to receive and examine all matters communicated to the Y. M., and to arrange all the queries and questions for public discussion, and after they are publicly discussed, and the general sentiment heard, then the delegates are to decide, and if two-thirds or more of the delegates agree, let the decision thus made be fiual. But if the nature of the case be such that two-thirds do not give their consent, then let it be delayed (postponed) until it receives the voice of at at least two-thirds of the legal representatives. The yearly meeting to be attended by as many teachers and members as may think proper to do so, and the privilege in discussion to be free and open to all who may desire to participate in the same as heretofore." Y. M. 1848. Art. 29. " The committee to whom the letters concern- ing our yearly meetings had been referred, reported as follows : No less than twelve letters from all parts of the church had been presented in regard to this important matter, and after reading and weighing them all. 14 ANNUAL MEETING. and taking also in view the general state of feeling and experience of this present meeting, we propose the following in the fear of the Lord : Considered, that this yearly meeting is as anxious and unanimous in the desire of following in the track of the apostles (Acts 15) as our beloved brethren were eleven years ago at the Y. M. in 1837. We find, however, by experience, that the change of the time of holding the council after public meeting doth work well, removing from us the great crowd of strangers. We are also satisfied, that the sending of delegates or mes- sengers from all the churches is necessary and proper, as also, that all the elders who come to us, ought to be members of the meeting, whether sent or not. A general committee of five or seven elders is to be appointed as heretofore, and as many special committees as may be deemed proper or necessary, in order to dispatch business. But as to voting, we hold that it will be best to aim always at unanimity, and dispose of business as hitherto. Should the meeting not be able to agree in any one point, let it be postponed to a future meeting. In addition, it was proposed that all the churches should be admonished to use every diligence in sending each year two delegates, or at all events one, to yearly meetings." " Tlie above was unanimousJy adopted (by the whole meeting) without a dissenting voice. Y. M. 1850. Art. 5. " Whether it is right for brethren in difierent arms of the church to go against the counsel of the yearly meeting ? Considered, that it is wrong for brethren to go against the counsel of our great annual meeting ; but should brethren not be satisfied with said counsel, they have liberty, with the consent of their church, to bring the matter before another yearly meeting for a reconsideration." Art. 22. " Whether the committee could not be selected, and the ques- tions taken in at our annual meetings, on Saturday as well as on Monday? Considered, to leave it as it is at present." Art. 32. " Why the annual meeting was not conducted or carried cut according to the order or plan laid down at the Y. M. 1847 ? Consid- ered, that the querists shall be referred to the minutes of Y. M. 1818, Art. 29, where twelve letters are mentioned, which contained chiefly re- monstrances against said plan." Y. M. 1851. Art. 9. "Would it not be better to alter the plan of holding our annual meetings, so as to have no public preaching, but only a church council meeting ? Considered, that at this time we could make no more alteration but this, that instead of meeting on Friday, and hav- ing public meeting on Saturday and Sunday, we will come together on Saturday evening, and meeting to commence on Sunday morning, and to be no communion meeting at the place of the annual meeting. The council meeting then to commence on Tuesday morning (after having pre- pared for business on Monday)." Y'^. M. 1853. Art. 1. Whether it would not give more general satis- faction in the arrangement of the standing committee, to select them by ANNUAL MEETING. ]5 ballot out of the whole number of ordained brethren present ? Consid- ered unanimously, to make no change in this matter from the ancient and present usage, viz. that the elders of the church where the yearly meeting is held, should have the privilege, as heretofore, to nominate said committee. Art. 13. Could not the brethren adopt a plan to hold the yearly meet- ings in such a manner that public preaching might be held in the neigh- borhood around, and not at the place for counsel ? Considered, to make no change for the present. Y. M. 1857. Art. 21. Wvu\d it not be better in deciding upon all subjects brought before our annual meeting, to refer first to the word of God, instead of first referring to the old minutes ? We think it always safest to refer first to the word of God. (So it is thought and believed that our old brethren also did, and by consulting them we maybe directly led to the word of God on the point in question.) Art. 24. Would it not be best for churches in selecting delegates to represent them in the annual council, to make choice of one deacon, or of one lay member, to serve as a delegate in connection with one minis- tering brother, and thus relieve the ministry from the responsible posi- tion of being the exclusive advisers of the churches ? Answer. — We think it should be left to the churches to select such members for dele- gates as they may think proper. Art. 31. Would it not be advisable to change the time of holding our annual meetings, as Whitsuntide comes too early some seasons, especially in some parts of the country? Answer. — We judge it best to make no change in the time of holding our annual council. Y. M. 1858. Art. 15. Would it not be agreeable to the gospel and the order of the Brethren, when the standing committee appoints com- mittees to go to other churches to settle difficulties, to authorize such brethren, whom circumstances will not permit to attend such council, to send some other ordained brethren in their places, so that there will be a full committee ? Considered, that it is the duty of such brethren that cannot go to appoint others in their places, that the committee may be full. Y. M. 1860. Art. 1. Inasmuch as we publicly denounce (human) church discipline, and claim the New Testament Scriptures as the only rule of our faith and practice, is it then consistent with our profession to make a direct observance of the minutes of the annual council a test of fellowship ? Answer. — The decisions of the annual meetings are obli- gatory until such decisions shall be repealed by the same authority. In our preliminary remarks at the head of this article, we have given the his- tory of the origin and manner of conducting these meetings from the first, as far as, or rather, including the first change, which in fact could scarcely be called a change ; for as we have shown already, there was no change in the time, nor in the manner of conducting the meeting, with the exception only of receiving the questions, which were formerly presented all viva voce in public meeting, and 16 ANOINTING THE SICK. afterward more privately to a committee, which was entrusted with conducting the business, in order t'j make a proper selection from those questions, as to •which were to be presented publicly, and which to be answered more privately by letter to those who sent the queries. We have already observed that this was a wise move in the right direction, a judicious and satisfactory improvement, in order to reduce the number of questions for public consideration, and finish the business within iwo days and a half. When our brethren could do so for over a hundred years, why cannot we? If it be objected, that there is so much more business now than then, granted ; but there are more laborers too. While formerly one committee labored alone, we can have as many committees as we need, to divide themselves into the work. Let only every committee use the dis- cretion our ancient brethren used, to make a proper distinction and selection among the questions presented to them. " Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty," and as there is liberty to ask, so there ought to be liberty to answer them. The first point to be considered by a committee upon any question, is this : Is it a fair, proper question, couched in a Christian spirit and in proper terms ? If not, our Saviour has himself left the example, not to answer such. If a proper question, it is to be decided whether it should be answered privately or brought before the public council, and published in the minutes. Oh, if our dear breth- ren had continued to exercise the discretion and discrimination which our ancient brethren had used, there would have been no need of so many changes as have occurred within the last thirty-three years, and no need of adding to the original two and a half days other two or three days, as the case now is, and calls so loudly for auother change. Let us recnpitulate the history of our annual meetings, as contained in the extracts of minutes given above. In 1813 the brethren declared to continue in the order heretofore declared and laid down by the old brethren (that lived before them). In 1832 was the last meeting according to the old order, and there it was concluded to change the time, commencing on Pentecost with worship, and to have Monday and Tuesday for counsel. Already in 1836 again another change was proposed, but not granted. In 1837 the time was changed back again to Friday and Saturday for counsel. In 1847, 1848, 1850, 1851, 1853, &c., changes were again proposed, as the careful reader himself may readily understand. But to what conclusion will he come after reading it over again ? Does it not seem as if in this matter our ship had lost its chart and compass, and no one knew rightly which way to steer? Or is it not as if a person in the wilderness loses his way, the main road, the beaten track, after night, and finds himself in the woods, or in the open prairie, and in the moon or starlight, or even without it, left to his own reason and resources, he feels and knows he has lost his way, but at first thinks he will soon right himself ; he tries one direction, and after a while turns round and tries another course, and thus goes on, until at last he becomes completely bewildered and exhausted, not knowing what to do? Well, we think the best thing he can do is to sit still, and wait till God sends him a guide or daylight. Brethren, let us do so too, and pray God for guidance and light, and if we ask in faith he will grant it in due time. ANOINTING THE SICK. On this head thus reads the word of God : " Is any sick among you ? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing Aim with oil in the name of the Lord : and the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have com- mitted sins, they shall be forgiven him. Confess your faults one to an- other, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much. Elias was a man sub- ject to like passions as we are, and he prayed earnestly that it might not rain : and it rained not on the earth by the space of three years and six months. And he prayed again, and the heavens gave rain, and the earth brought forth her fruit, &c." James 5 : 14-18. Th:s " anointing of the sick,'' based on the Scripture given above, is, as far as ANOINTING THE SICK. 17 our limited knowledore extends, r ot practiced by any of the modern denomina- tions, except by ilie Roman and tlie Ureek Cburclies under tlie name " Extreme Unction." and it is iherefore necessary to explain oiir position as fiinple followers ofClirist and primitive Christianity in respect to this matter. We find in the cros- pel evidences that our Lord and Saviour submitted himself no less than three times to an anointinf; by different persons. We find also that at least in one case the Saviour declared, that wheresoever his g'ospel should be preached it should be also mentioned what had been done to him in this respect. From this we infer that our Lord and Master deemed this an act worthy not only of re- membrance, but also of imitation. He also instructed his disciples amocjr other things to "anoint the sick," and we cannot doubt that they obeyed this instruc- tion And now, since we cannot exercise this act any more on the person of Christ himself, we simply obey what .James has recorded, namely, when one of the very least of the members of Christ calls upon the elders of the rhurch, the member being sick, and desirous for that anointing, we feel i' our duty to obey that call. We believe if it is dntie and received in faith, the Lord will accept it as if d ine unto himself, and he will bless it either to raise the sick again from his sick-bed, or, what is far better, raise him or her up to glory. Y. M. 1797. Art. 5. From James 5 : 14, &c., the brethren testified unanimously, " that the sick who desire and call for it, should be anoint- ed, according to the word of the holy apostle, in the name of the Lord." Y. M. 1812. Art. 1. In case a brother or sister should desire in their sickness to be anointed, it might be administered to them, provided they would not seek further help from an earthly physician; and if it should so be that the Lord would raise them again to health, and they should fall sick again, and think the Lord would call them away, and they ask again to be anointed, we would have no right from the word of God to refuse them, and it should be left to those brethren's wisdom who are called to do as the anointing will teach them. (1 John 2 : 20.) Y. M. 1827. Art. 1. About the ordinance of anointing the sick, the manner of proceeding has ever been, first to sing a few verses, and with a united prayer to turn to God. Then (there should always be two breth- ren) the one reaches forth his hand, and the other poureth the oil on it, and the first puts the same on the head of the sick, and says the words which the Apostle James teaches (chap. 5 : 14), "Thou art anointed in the name of the Lord," and thus three times, but the words only once said. Then both brethren lay their hands upon the head of the sick, and pray over him. For it is not considered to be intended only an in- ward unction, but an outward anointing, whereof the apostle speaks, as mentioned before. From manuscript accounts of elder brethren concerning the same, and exhibiting it more particularly, we have the following : As regards the ANOINTING, it requires two brethren in order to perform it, according to the advice of the apostle, since he says, " Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him." Thes3 words require more than one. Now when we are going to perform the same, the first we do after singing a few appropriate lines, and briefly exhorting, is to turn to God unitedly, and to pray God for a blessing upon ourselves, upon the sick member and upon all, as we do in a meeting, and there is liberty to pray for all the brethreu present. If time will permit, and strangers are 2 18 ANOINTING THE SICK. present, the passage of James, cliap. 5, may be read as far as relates to this matter, and briefly commented upon. Then the sick member is raised to a sitting position (if the state of the patient permits), and the elder brother reaches forth his hand, and the other brother pours the oil upon it, while he (the first) puts it upon the head cf the sick, and thus three times, saying the words of the apostle : " Thou art anointed in the name of the Lord" — unto the strengthening of thy faith — unto the comforting of thy conscience — and unto a full assurance of the remission of thy sins, or as the Lord may give utterance, and then the brethren both put their hands upon the sick, even as it is done when a brother is ordained, and pray chiefly for the sick member. Such an example we have of the Sa- viour, as we see in Mark 6 : 15 and 16 : 18, and this is the order the brethren have administered the same. Brethren who are not ordained may administer it in cases of necessity. [Appendix to Min. 1814.] Y. M. 1828. Art. 5. Whether a member might be anointed more than once, was considered and decided, that it may be done on request of the sick person. Y. M. 1837. Art. 4. How it is considered, to administer the anoint- ing of the sick, or to hold an election without an ordained brother (elder) being present? It is the advice, that the anointing of the sick should not be administered without an ordained brother, except in a case of ne- cessity when no such is to be had, for the word says, " Call for the elders of the church." Y. 31. 1844. Art. 9. What to do in case a member on a sick or death- bed requests to have the bread of commuision broken unto him ? Con- sidered, that the word of God does not seem to us to justify the breaking of the bread of communion to an individual member (for where there is but one there can be no communion), and that therefore we would be more safe to direct such a member to the grace and mercy of God in Christ Jesus, and to the advice of the Apostle James (5 : 14) where he says, Is any sick among you, let hiui call for the elders of the church, and let them pray orcr him, anointmy him with oil in the name of the Lord" Ike. Y. M. 1850. Art. 30. Who are the proper persons in the church to administer the ordinance recorded James 5 ; 14? Considered, the bish- ops or ordained elders. Art. 31. Is there any second order of persons in the church, who may administer the above ordinance in cases of great and pressing necessity, when the proper administrators cannot be had in time for the urgency of the case ? Considered, in such case brethren in less office, if at least one of them is authorized to baptize, might serve. Art. 82. May the above ordinance be administered to a person who is not a member of the church, although solemnly believing in the healing vir- tues of the above, both spiritually and bodily, and requesting it of the church, such ;;erson3 being in a dangerous situation, having shown fruits ANXIOUS BENCH— APPEAL. 19 of repentance, and perfect willingness, if spared, to bow under the order of the church ? Considered, that it could not be done, but that we are to direct to the (abundant) grace and mercj of God. Y. M. 1852. Art. 20. Are persons, who can be up and about, and go to meeting, proper subjects to receive the anointing; or, has the apostle only reference to such who are altogether confined ? Considered, that the apostle has only alluded to those who are sick or in a decline of life. Art. 21. Is it agreeable to the sense of the word, that the anointing should be performed more than once in the same illness or confinement? Considered, that no person should be anointed more than once in the same sickness, according to our understanding of the word of God. Y. M. 1853. Art. 43. Concerning anointing the sick with oil. Con- sidered, that it should be administered according to the manner laid down by the brethren in the minutes of 1844, to be reprinted now again if there is room left. Y. M. 1860. Art. 5. How is it considered when members that are sick, call for the elders of the church, and are anointed according to the go.«pel, and then again resort to the use of medicine ? Is it wrong to do so 'i Answer. — We do not consider it wrong according to the gos- pel to do so. Art. 6. As we see a dilFerence in the words used in anointing the sick, ■we therefore ask for the most proper ceremony and manner for observing the same, according to the gospel and practice of the old brethren ? Answer. — As the di0"ereuce is not stated in the query, we know of no- thing better than that which the brethren have given us in the appendix to the minutes of 1853; (the same as given above from appendix of minutes, 1844.) Y. M. 1862. Art. 54. Who are the elders spoken of by James that are to be sent to anoint the sick in the name of the Lord ? Answer. — The ordained elders, if they can be obtained ; if not, the next in office. ANXIOUS BENCH. Y. M. 1842. Art. 2. Whether it will be to the edification of the church of God to hold protracted meetings, and to introduce mournirg benches, in imitation of the new measures adopted by different sects and denominations '! The brethren generally considered, that it was advisa- ble to be very cautious, and at all times to keep good order in accordance with the doctrine and example of the apostles, and not to introduce such innovations like mourning benches, &c. APPEAL TO THE YEARLY MEETING. Y. M. 1833. Art. 7. Whether a member has a right to appeal to the yearly meeting, wlien put back by the council of his church 't The an- swer, not recorded, was similar to the following : Y. M. 1819. Art. 20. When the church deals with a member or mem- 20 audent spirits. bers, and they are not satisfied with the proceedings of the church, whether it is in their or the church's place to write to strange brethren for assistance ? Coosidered, that the church would have to write, if any strange brethren should be called on. ARDENT SPIRITS, making, selling and using of. Y. M. 1781. Art. 2. Concerning distilleries, we heartily counsel all brethren who have distilleries, that they should by all means endeavor to put them away, in order to escape Irom the evil so often arising from them, and to avoid offence, and in this the brethren are still entirely united with the conclusion made at Pipe Creek, three years ago. Y. M. 1783. Art. 1. At this great meeting a unanimous conclusion was laid down Avith regard to the very offensive evil which has endeavor- ed to gain ground in the church, and by which already much mischief has been done, while tlie brotherly counsel has been repeatedly given, that distilleries (of ardent spirits) in the church (among members) should be put away. And since there are still from time to time more erected, it has been at this time unanimously concluded, that those brethren who have distilleries should be earnestly admonished to put them out cf the way, and when they have been admonished in sincere love once and again, and they would not obey the counsel of the church, and not put away this loathsome idol, we could not break the bread of communion with them, and have to withdraw also the kiss and church council from them, until they are willing again to hear the church, as they have promised also at first at their baptism, before God and many witnesses. Y. M. 1789. Art. 1. At the council meeting of the brethren it was in union deemed good and necessary, and we feel it also to be our duty to counsel as follows : Inasmuch we deem it our duty, obligation and office to see to it that union, tranquility and peace be maintained, that all should be united and of one mind, so that we may, according to the commandment of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, love one another sincerely, and be enabled to love as he has given us a commandment, by which it shall be known that we are his disciples; therefore, it is our desire, that every grievance and every offence might be put out of the way ; and inasmuch there is a grievance and offence on account of the dis- tilleries of ardent spirits, because the old brethren could not allow them, and sad experience has taught us that almost whole families are gone to destruction, and the children have fallen into drunkenness and a rowdy life, the brethren some years ago came to the conclusion that they should be done away. But this has not yet been done, but there have been more bought and established since, and the evil is still growing. This makes a grievance and offence, that hardly one church can break bread with the other, and as has happened already, that brethren out of love had come a considerable distance, but when they saw that brethren who had distille- ries went to communion, they had to remain away, and go home again in ARDENT SPIRITS. 21 grief, because they had not been able to partake of the memorial of the death of our Lord Jesus Christ oa account of this grievous and oflFensive thing. Thus grief, disunion and division are brought upon the church. For this cause we beseech earnestly all brethren who have distilleries, to be diligent to put them away ; and hereby exhort in heartfelt and humble love, all our much beloved fellow laborers in God, to use herein diligence in admonishing earnestly each member to obey this counsel of love, so that peace, love and union may be planted and restored. But whosoever is not willing to deny himself, as it should be indeed, and cannot or will not out of love obey this our loving counsel, then we cannot consider him otherwise but as such who has not yet died (to sin), and is not yet risen with Christ in newness of life, and that he seeks more the things tempo- ral than eternal, more the things on earth than those in heaven, more the things that pass away than the things that remain, and that he is in great danger to lose the everlasting treasure. Y. M. 1804. Art. 2. Further it has been unanimously concluded, that no brother or sister should be engaged, by or with a permit, to sell strong drink, wine or ardent spirits by the quart or larger quantity, be- cause it is feared that disorder and harm will arise thereby. Therefore all members who are engaged therein should be earnestly and faithfully exhorted in love and long-suffering to abstain from it, in order that such example may not lead our youth and offspring into licentiousness and scandal. Rut if one or the other should not heed such counsel of love and admonition, and not hear the church, we could not look upon such act otherwise than as being disobedient according to an impartial judg- ment. Y. M. 1821. Art. 5. Whether brethren may have distilleries or not? It was considered, to leave it by what was concluded some thirty years ago, that no brother would be allowed to have a distillery or to distill ardent spirits. Y. M, 1822. Art. 7. With regard to distilleries (held or carried on) by members of the church, it was again testified that it could not be permitted. They should be admonished to put them away, and if they would not heed the counsel of love, we could not have fellowship with them. Art. 9. If a brother has a vendue, and gives freely strong drink, how is it considered ? It was considered, that no brother should give strong drink at the sale of his property. Y. M. 1825. Art. 1. Whether a brother may keep and sell strong drink, has been considered thus : because so often disorder is caused by strong drink, it is improper for a brother to sell it, and should not be at all suffered. Y. M. 1827. Art. 5. Whether a brother holding an office in the church may distill ardent spirits, was considered, and concluded that it is not becoming for any brother to do so, much less for a brother in office. 22 ARDENT SPIRITS. Y. M. 1828. Art. 10. Whether brethren may have distilleries was considered, and concluded that it should not be, nor by their children, as far as the authority of the parents extends ; and if such brother will not take (or obey) the advice, we could not commune nor have fellowship with him. Also, to sell grain to distilleries (cspecinlly) when grain is scarce, should indeed not be. Y. M. 1832. Art. 3. Whether it could be allowed for brethren to en- gag3 in store keeping and iselling strong drink ? The first may in cases of necessity, where members cannot make their living otherwise, but the latter in no case. Y. M. 1833. Art. 8. About the making and using of strong drink, a strong testimony was made at this meeting against it. Y. M. 1835. Art. 8. About distilleries, like the foregoing. Y. M. 1835, in Jliami. Art. 9. How it is considered to sell grain to distilleries ? Should not be, except in case of necessity. Art. 11. IIow it is considered for brethren to keep tavern ? Not proper. Y. M. 1836. Art. 2. Whether a brother or sister could be allowed to sell strong drink ? Considered, that it should absolutely not be. Y. M. 1837. Art. 11. How it is considered, when a brother keeps a brewery, and makes strong beer ? Considered, that it could not be di- rectly Ibrbidden to a brother, but ought to be left to his own conscience, and to advise him that the safest would be not to carry on such a busi- ness, from which may arise so many and great disorders. Y. M. 1838. Art. 3. Whether it be proper for a member to build a distillery, or distill ardent spirits ? Considered, as it has been considered these many years, that it ought not to be. Y. M. 184U. Art. 11. What is to be done with a brother who is erect- ing a distillery, and makes and sells ardent spirits ? Considered, that when a brother has been admonished once and again, and will not be obedient to the counsel of the church, we could not break the bread of communion with him. Besides, it is the advice of the old brethren to dissuade all the members from the common use of intoxicating drinks, particularly at raising buildings, hay-making and harvesting. Y. M. 1841. Art. 14. Concerning the use of ardent spirits, it was considered, that it is a great evil, leading to vice and crime, to destruction of peace and property, and to the ruin of body and soul, and that mem- bers of the church of Christ ought to refrain from the use of it except as medicine. Y. M. 1842. Art. 4. IIow it is considered, if a brother or sister signs the pledge of total abstinence ? Considered, inasmuch as our churches have always testified against intemperance, and even against the free use, the making and selling of ardent spirits, it is not advisable for members to put their hands to the pledge, or to meddle with the proceedings and excitements of the world on the subject. Y. M. 1845. Art. 10. How is it considered, when a brother is carry- ASSIGNING PROPERTY— ATTEST. 23 ing on a distillery ? Considered in the same light as our ancient breth- ren did sixty-two years ago in an annual council meeting held on Pipe Creek, Maryland, June 7, 1783. (See above.) Y. M. 1846. Art. 7. Whether a brother may work in distilleries for wages ? And whether a brother, who owns a mill, may buy, sell and chop grain for distilleries ? Considered, that as the use of ardent spirits is always dangerous to the wellbeing of society, and the brethren have frequently testified against the making and using of the same, it would be best for brethren not to have anything to do with it in any shape or form. Y. M. 1853. Art. 27. Whether it is allowed for brethren to distill fruit, or get it distilled and sell the liquor ? We say. No, not at all. Y. 31. 185(5. Art 4. How is it considered, when a church uuitedly agrees not to use ardent spirits, except for medical, mechanical or com- munion purposes, and a member of said church will not comply with the above decision ? Considered, that such member should be dealt with as in other offences. Y. M. 1857. Art. 1. Concerning the use of ardent spirits among the Brethren. Considered, that every brother that is entrusted with the oversight of the church, should exert his influence, by example and pre- cept, to induce all the members of his congregation to abstain altogether from the use of ardent spirits as an article of luxury, or as a drink ; and not to give it to the working hands to drink, admitting it only for medical or mechanical purposes. The same advice is given to all the ofiicers in all the churches throughout our whole brotherhood. Y. M. 1862. Art. 26. What is to be done with a brother that buys whiskey by the barrel, and sells it to such as he thinks use it temperately ; and when admonished once and again not to sell, he says he will be more careful to sell to none but those who use it temperately ? Answer. — Any brother dealing in intoxicating liquors, if he continues to do so after be- ing admonished, cannot be fellowshipei as a brother. ASSIGNING PROPERTY. Y. M. 1822, at Canton. Art. 8. How it is viewed when a brother as- signs his property to another, with a view to defraud his neighbors (creditors). It is considered, that we cannot hold him in fellowship. ATTEST, TAKING THE. To understand this term, we must go back to the time when the advice was given. The year ITTS, in the history of our country was the second year of that revolutionary war by which struggle it was to be decided whether our countiy should continue under the government of England, or become an inde- pendent self-governing people. While this question remained undecided many God-fearing people would not conscientiously transfer their allegianf e to the States, which was done by the "attest," while some did. Why our brethren could not approve of this talking the attest, was more fully explained in the fol- lowing year, as it will apj ear in the minutes of that year, given also above. From this it will appear also, that our brethren always stood aloof from political strife. 24 ATTEST. Y. M. 1778. After much reflection in the fear of the Lord, it has been concluded in union, that the brethren who have taken the attest should recall it before a justice, and give up their certificate, and recall and apologize in their churches, and trul}' repent for the error. If they cannot do this, and will justify themselves, the apostle exhorts us we should withdraw ourselves from every brother who walketh disorderly, and such a brother will be deprived of the kiss of fellowship, of the counsel, and the breaking of bread, until he becomes obedient again. Ministers and elders who have taken the attest, and are sorry and griev- ed for it, confessedly recall the matter before the justice of the peace and in the public church, counsel shall be held about them in their churches in presence of one or more ministers or overseers, to consider in the fear of the Lord, whether he or such as before mentioned could serve again in their office. But if such minister or elder should approve himself stub- bornly, and justify his course, yea, even teach the same, then we cannot comprehend how he can be obedient to the Spirit of truth, which teaches we shall not touch the unclean thing, nor be unequally yoked together with unbelievers, because Christ has no concord with Belial. Therefore we decide that such laborers are unfit in the Lord's vineyard, and also unfit to be members in the church of the living God, until their minds are changed, and they speak again with new tongues, or find their hearts with David. May God have mercy upon us ! Y. M. 1779. On account of taking the attest, it has been concluded in union as follows : Inasmuch as it is the Lord our God who establish- es kings and removes kings, and ordains rulers according to his own good pleasure, and we cannot know whether God ha.« rejected the king and chosen the state, while the king had the government; therefore we could not with a good conscience repudiate the king, and give allegiance to the states. And it seems to us that those who have done so have committed a fault, on ac- count of which fault we could not break bread with them, but bear with them in love. But if they would come moved by their own conviction, and would make acknowledgments, being truly repentant, then we might forgive them, and we believe God would also forgive them, and we might break bread with them. But in regard to the laborers (ministers), we think they should stand still in their labor, and not baptize or administer in the breaking of bread. Should they, however, come convinced in themselves to have erred, and show contrition, saying, We are sorry," then we might forgive them, and be in full fellowship with them, yet so that the church to which he belongs should be satisfied with him, when he should continue in his office. But if such go still further in this matter, as holding office (political) and so forth, show no sorrow, and rather con- tinue in such course, then they should be also deprived of the church council and holy kiss, and nota bene, not only the ministers, but all who have taken this course. AUTHORITY OF A BISHOP— AVOIDANCE. 25 AUTHORITY OF A BISHOP. (See also, " ^/Jtop.") Y. M. 1822, Gauton. Art. 3. How far should a brother keep house without counseling the church, or members without counseling the housekeeper? It was considered, that the brother who is housekeeper should always act in concert with the church, especially with his co- laborers in the church, and just so his co-laborers should always counsel with their elder brother, and a private brother should not undertake to teach or serve until the church calls him to it. Y. M. 184:0. Art. 4. Is in the churches of the Brethren any materi- al difference among the bishops, so that one has more power (authority) than another ? Considered, that according to the word of our Saviour, Matt. 23: 8, "One is your master, even Christ; and all ye are breth- ren there is no difference in the brotherhood or among bishops but that which a higher age and more wisdom and experience may give. See 1 Pet. 5 : 5, " Ye younger, submit yourselves to the elder." Y. M. 1848. Art. 20. Whether three or more ordained elders have the authority of liberating out of avoidance, independent of the church ? Considered, that it cannot be done properly without the counsel and con- sent of the church. Y. jM. 1849. Art. cG. Has a bishop authority to request a deacon who moved into his church without a letter of recommendation from the church from which he came, to take his place at a meeting for worship, and to preach or exhort ? Considered, that he has no such authority, and the members that move from one church to another, ought always to bring a certificate of their membership and standing. Art. 37. If a member commits an open fault in the world, has the overseer authority to send brethren to investigate the matter before coun- seling the church ? Considered, that the overseer has the authority to do so. Y. M. 1850. Art. 17. How is it considered, when a sister has an un- believing husband who gets drunk and abuses her, and attempts to kill her with an axe ; she then leaves him, and returns to her father, who then goes to the housekeeper in the church for advice, upon whose ad- vice a bill of divorce is obtained ? Considered, that a hou.sekeeper has no right to give such advice without coun.se]ing the church; neither had the sister a right to get divorced without such counsel. (See Matt. 19 : 6-9, 1 Cor. 7 : 11.) AVOIDANCE, OR EXCOMMUNICATION. Avoidance is a term not known or used in the ecclesiastic terminolop^y of the greater part of so-called Christian professors of the present day, outside of our frateinity and a few other communities of a more ancient date. For this reason we have added another term, which is more in general use by eccle.si;istical wri- ters, though not strictly a scriptural term. We will give the definition of both terms by the lexicographer Webster: "Avoidance: the act of avoiding or shunning. To avoid is to shun ; to keep at a distance; to avoid the company of a certain person." Excommunication in an ecclesiastical sense, is defined by the 26 AYOID^^XCE. same author as "the act of ejecting from a church; expulsion from the com- munioa of a church and deprivation of its rights, privileges and advantages: an ecclesiastical penalty or punishment inflicted on offenders. Escommun.citian is an ecclesi istical interdict (or prohibition) of two kinds, the lesser and the greater. The lesser eseo'-iimunication is a separation or suspension of the offender from partaking of the cucharist (comm-;nion) ; the greater is an absolute separation au'i exclusion from the church and all its rights and advantages." Cruden in his Concordance defines e-xcommunication as " an ecclesiastical cen- sure whereby they who incur the guilt of any heinous sin, are separated from the communion of the church, and deprived of spiritual advantages; that they may be brought to repentance, and others, by their example, kept from the like enormities. Matt. 18 : 15-17 ; 1 Cor. 5: 5-7 ; 2 Thess. 3: 14, 15." He is also speaking of a '-lesser and greater excommunication." While we agree with these authors in the l>st mentioned point, that there must be different degrees of church censure, as there are different degrees of guilt, we are compelled to differ from them, when the}- speak of ejecting, expelling, which imply the use of phys- ical force, as being so contrary to the spirit and law of Christ, that no Christian could entertain such an idea, much less perform such an act. Hence the Brethien prefer the simple term " avoida-jce" to the Jewish word ''ban" or -'anathema," or to the Roman term '-excommunication." The reason is. because avoidance is a simple, plain word in our own language, readily understood by all. and not subject to misapprehension, as words taken from other languages, and having acquired a signification foreign to the letter and spirit of the gospel, and what is still more, because it is a scriptural term. True, the s'lbstantive noun does not occur in our common version of the Bible, but the verb and root of the sub- stantive, AVOID, occurs in the following passages: 1 Sam. 18: 11. "David avoided out of his presence twice." Prov. 4 : 15, " Avoid it, (». e. the path of the wicked and th^; way of evil men.) pass not by it, turn from it. and pass away." Eom. 16: 17. - Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause division and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned, and av Ad them." 1 Cor. 7:2: '-Nevertheless to avoid fornication, let every man have his own ■wife." 2 Cor. 8 : 20, ' Avoiding this, that no man should blame us." 1 Tim. 6 : 20, ' Avoiding profiine and vain babblings and opposi'ions of science, falsely so-called." 2 Tim. 2:23: - But foolish and unlearned questions avoid " Titus 3: 9, 10, ''Avoid foolish questions, &c." And when in the next verse " reject" occurs, in Greek it is the same word as in 2 Tim. 2 : 23, Tvhere it is translated '- avoid." From these passages it is sufficiently clear what the general idea of avoidance is, namely, to avoid, shun and keep at a distance from evil, from physical or moral evil, and from evil men; and from two of the passages, Rom. 16 : 17, and Tit. 3: 10. it is evident that they refer expressly to the ordinance under consid- eration. But we must bring our remarks to a speedy close. That the main law of Christ concerning avoidance is recorded in Matt. 18 : 15-20, and in 1 Cor.' 5 frotn be- ginning to end, but more particularly verses 9-13, has been mentioned already, and will be repeated again in the following articles of counsel of the Brethren at yearly meetings. A critical and prayerful examination of these and other pass- ages, together with a careful study of the history of the churches and of man- kind, has convinced the writer cf the correctness of the views and practice of the brethren in this respect, and that they can be defended against every objec- tion of a candid believer of the word of God. Our brotherhood was once a unit on the subject (of course, with exceptions, as there was one among the Twelve an exception), as the sequel of this article will show. For more than a century it was the universal belief among our brethren, that this was as much an institution of the Lord as baptism, or any other ordinance, and none could gainsay it. But times have changed ; a whole generation of old and faithful and steadfast brethren has almost entirely passed away, and at least in some parts of our wide-spread fraternity a new generation has come up, •■ which knew not Joseph; " and of late, sad to teil, it has come openly to light, that we are no longer in such cordial union on this and some kindred subjects as our brethren once were. We love our dear brethren, even those who do not see alike with us ; indeed we thank them that they have come out openly and will- ing for discussion, and thus caused others to think and reflect on the subject more seriously than they ever did. We hope that all. are desirous to be in union and full, real fellowship on every practical question. The reason why we AVGIDAXCE. 27 feel specially grateful to those brethren dissenting on this subject, is this, that we have investigated the same a'^ain more deej)!/ tlian ever, and we hoped to be a":)le by this time to lay before our brethren the result of our labors. In this we failed ; it was impossinle for us to accomplish that part yet ; but it is yet our intention, if the Lord spares our life, and grants his blessing, to do so at a future day. To do the subject full justice, we feared that it would make a much greater work than we at first coulemplated. and we desired also to give those documents of our older brethren or yearly meetings, which we nave been collect- ing ever since we came to the church, many of which might finally have been lost altogether, if not put in print, the preference over our own work, which we would rather leave as a legacy to our dear brethren, to be published after we have departed this life, or at least wait until the brotherhood is more in union again oa this sui-ject. For more union among us, which is the bond of love, I wish myself and all our brethren and sisters to piay, and to labor and even to suffer with all our hearts. Let us consider what our nation has done and suffered, and thousands have prayed during the late conflict for a merely human inslrutuent, called the constitution, and for an earthly and temporal union ! Should we then not stand as one man for that constitution which is of a divine origin, and for that union which will last forevermore ? We now merely add to those above our definition and description, derived from the word of God and the once universal practice of our brethren. The ordinance of avoidanCt: is an institution of the Lord Jestis Christ for the preservation of the purity and unity of the church, and for the bringing to re- pentance and restoration of fallen members. In cases of private offences and mi- nor faults, which upon acknowledgment and submission to the CvUiisel of the church might be readily forgiven and remitted, if the offender obstinately re- fuses to do so, and thus will not '-hear the church." then, if admonished once and again, the church has no choice but to submit herself to the necessity and duty to pronounce the sentence e.xpressed in Malt. 18 17, t. e. she must avoid in part such stubborn aierabers, by not admitting them to communion or church council, and not saluting them as members This avoiding in part was called by some ciwpeiiding. and Cyprianus of the second century called it putting back, and so do our brethren to tliis day. But in cases of crimes and such heinous sins as enu- merated 1 Cor. 5:11, ",nd other places, a different course is to be pursued. Here confession and acknowledgment will not suflBce, nor a putting back or avoiding in part would answer the purpose of justice and mercy; hence Love and Wisdom divine devised and ordained '' not to keep company with such, no not to eat,"' and to this our ancient brethren from the time we have any record of them, and many that live to this day, without adding or taking away a single word (for they tremble a' God's word, Rev. 22 : 18, 19) gave their most humble yet willing assent and obedience, took up the cross as cross-bearing children of God should do (and there is undoubtedly i cross in this ordinance, and not a pleasure), and this they called /((/i avoidance. Why the Lord did not in-titute this while yet jjersonall}- on earth, the answer may be, may it not have been one of those thing."? which the Lord had to tell the disciples, but they could not bea,r it then. What Paul said and did. he did it in the name of Christ, and consequently as if the Lord bad said and done it himself. From the testimony of the Brethren in 171.^ (fully 150 years ago). See " Groundsearching Questions" in Alexander Mack's writings, page 129. Where Qu. 22 reads thus : Whether the external ban (excoramunicntion) is an essential part of (the constitution of) the church of Christ, since he himself did not enforce and exercise it, even upon the very wicked .Judas? Ans. — The ban is an essen- tial and necessary thing in the church of Christ, as long as ii is at war in this ■wicked world with wolves and evil spirits. Xo church of Christ could exist without it. [This idea has been misunderstood and rejected, seeing that there are churches in existence, and some have been for a long time without the avoidance. But the main point with regard these is : Will Christ acknowledge them to belong to his church, if they do not observe all whatsoever Christ commanded them ?] The devil, with his leaven of wickedness, would soon destroy all that is good. True believ- ers, while they were steadfast in the faith, never could refuse it (the salutary re- straints appointed in the gospel). They have als-ays viewed them as divine means of grace, appointed by the great love and provident care of God, and used them as a strong tower and wall round about the church of the Lord.* With respect to Judas we say. that Christ has e.\ecuted the ban suffitiently upon him, giving him over to Satan ; for he hanged himself But that he was 28 AVOIDANCE. not excommunicated before he committed the outward act, 13 not against excom- munication, but rather in its favor. That this was the mind of God at all times, as wc percfivu ia Adam, who may have had probably some iutercourse with the tempter previous to his fall ; bui he was not driven out of Paradise until he had actually eaten of the forbidden fruit. So Judas may have enteitained traitorous thoughts long before he carried them out; but the long-suffering oi' Jesus had borne with him, and patiently tried to bring him to repentance, until the evil ob- tained the sujjremacy, and became manifest in the deed. Then ke was sufficiently excommunicated by Christ, and we think the ban was fully e.vecuted upon him. Ihid. page 1.32. Qu. 25. Whether the apostles ever prohibited the necessary spiritual or temporal assistance of charity from being rendered to the excom- municated? Ans. — The apostles have never commanded to withhold from the ex- communicated necessary spiritual or temporal assistance; moreover, they are to be admonished to repentance, and though they do not hear, or receive it, we are clear. So likewise in worldly things, if we abound in the things of this world, and the excommunicated is in want, we are to communicate according to his need. Qu. 2S. Whether your, the new Baptists, excommunication ever had ia any of its subjects such a divine effect and result as that of the apostles ? Ans. Wc firmly believe that all those we excommunicate according to the word of the Lord, will 'eel an internal effect, and an impression already here ; and if not re- penting in this time of grace it will become manifest in the great day of judg- ment. But that men should immediately fall dead to the ground like Anaui*is, such has not happened yet, and is only once recorded of the apostles ? and how- ever many were excommunicated by the apostles, no more died thus literally, yet we believe the power of excommunication was fully realized in them. Y. M. 179-1. Art. 6. Concerning the ban, we woiill very readily deny ourselves so much for our brethren's sake, so as to drop the Jewish word " ban." But the ordinance of the Lord Jesus and his holy apostles we cannot give up even for our brethren's sake, namely : " If any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner ; with such a one no not to eat," 1 Cor. 5 : 11. Here we see clearly that Paul does not mean only the eat- ing in (the Lord's) supper, but all eating (in his company). This is shown in the foregoing verse very plainly, when it says, " yet not alto- gether with the fornicators of this world, etc." Otherwise we might cat the bread of communion with the fornicators of this world, which cer- tainly he cannot have meant at all. y. M. 1805. Art. 1. Concerning those who are in avoidance. Since some think that we may or should not even give them the hand, while others would feel disposed at times to offer them the hand as a token that we would willingly assist them to be released and reconciled again, the unanimous conclusion was, that we should be of one mind, and fol- low the same rule in housekeeping, and it was so laid down, that it might be best to offer them in that view the hand, but to have no dealings with them nor any familiar intercourse until a reformation takes place in them. Y. M. 1822, Canton. Art. 11. How shall the church conduct itself toward those members that have been separated from the church ? Considered, first, when a member is separated from the church as far as from the kiss, breaking of bread and church council, such ought to be diligently exhorted according to the evidence of the apostle, but could not be called brother. But when such would not receive the AVOIDANCE. 29 admonition of love, and should fall into more grievous sins, the church has to put them in avoidance, and have no company with them, accord- ing to the word of the apostle. Y. M. 1822, Miami. Art. 1. When a member is put in avoidance, how far is his companion in wedlock to be held as a member ? It was considered, that she may be held as a member, yet so as not to break the bread of communion. Y. M. 1825. Art 3. Concerning separation or excommunication, be- ing viewed of unequal degrees. It was considered, that according to apostolic doctrine, such having committed gross or vicious sins, must be put entirely in avoidance, while less transgressions only precluded from the kiss, brotherly counsel, and the breaking of bread. Y. M. 1827. Art. 2. About the avoidance and restoration of mem- bers. T\'hen a member, on account of crimes committed, must be sepa- rated and put in avoidance, and should afterward become reformed in life and conduct, and apply for restoration, or for release from the avoidance, and the church could not yet feel satisfied to restore such en- tirely, they might be released ; and should such fall again into crime, we would have a right to put them again into avoidance. Y. M. 18.37. Art. G. Whether the sense of the words of the Saviour, Matt. 18, " Let him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican ! " is the same as the sentence of the apostle, 1 Cor. 5, " Have no company with him," &c. It is understood by the meeting almost unanimously, that the expression of the Saviour, " Let him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican," excludes a member only so far as from the church council, from the ki.ss and from the breaking of bread, but that the in- tention of the apostle when he speaks of the vicious (gross sinner), " Have no company with him," and after noting the (sins, crimes) vices, adds yet, ' with such a one (you ought) no not eat I" that we ought to avoid such altogether, according to the (obvious) sense of the word. Y. M. 1838. Art. 1. Whether a congregation (church) has the right, according to the gospel, to put a member in avoidance or not ? Consid- ered, that the old brethren always have thought it light, and (we) still think it right, according to the gospel, to put members in avoidance in accordance with the word of the gospel, 1 Cor. 5 : 9-11. Y. M. 1840. Art 3. In case one that was a brother, but now is held in avoidance, lives some hundred miles from a brother to whom he owes a debt, and writes back to brethren, that he were willing to pay, if he knew how much (he owed) ; whether in such case the brother might take the liberty to write to him and ascertain what amount he owes him? Considered, that brethren might make out and send such accounts, inas- much it was at all times allowed to settle accounts with such members that had been put in avoidance. Y. M. 1840. Art. 4. About the difference among brethren in regard to avoidance J since some seem to know or observe nothing at all of 30 AVOIDANCE. an avoidance, others take the liberty to eat with and greet as breth- ren tlioi^e that are put in avoidance, which causes oftentimes tempta- tions and great grief in those who feel themselves in duty bound, accord- ing to the word, to observe the avoidance strictly ? Considered, that it is truly to be lamented that such a want of uniformity has crept in by degrees among the brethren in such a most important matter, and that it should be the ardent desire and earnest endeavor of all brethren and members, and especially of all ministers and housekeepers, to come again into full union in observing this evangelical and apostolic ordi- nance, to accomplish which may the ever faithful Chief Shepherd and Bishop of our souls grant his grace and the assistance of his good and holy Spirit. Y. M. 1842. Art. 1. Whether the sense of the words of our Saviour, Matt. 18, " Let him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican !" is the same with the expression of I'aul the Apostle, when he says, " Have no company with him !" 1 Cor. 5 ? This same query had been before the yearly meeting in Virginia in the year 1837, and a similar one before the annual meeting in Morrison's Cove in the year 1840, and even in the year 1794 (almost fifty years ago) the brethren expressed their views on the subject, which were read, and the brethren now assembled generally agreed to the then expressed views, desiring with our departed brethren, that our dearly beloved members would seek (endeavor) to hold fast to the written word of truth, for we fear with them, that whosoever will depart from it is in great danger of being deceived in these much con- fused times. Now he that attends strictly to the word, will see plaiul}', that Matt. 18 is quite another case thin is mentioned in 1 Cor. 5. There the Saviour speaks of sins (trespasses) and offences which a brother or sister may commit against a fellow member. Here the apostle treats of vices and crimes which may be committed against God and the truth. And as there is a difference in the sins, even so is there also a difference in the discipline (or penalty). Already under the law there were some sins unto death, where the sinner had to die without mercy under two or three witnesses. Heb. 10 : 28. But some sins were not unto death, and would be atoned for by offerings and saciifices. Even as there is a dif- ference in the discipline under the gospel, as we may plainly see from those passages before alluded to, viz. Matt. 18 : lu-18, and 1 Cor. 5 : 9-14, if we examine them somewhat more closely. Therefore the brethren have always considered, and we consider it so still, that the di- vine sense requires to disown a member who will not be admonished, when he has been overtaken in a i'ault, which might have been atoned for by an acknowledgment, for his refusing to acknowledge, only so far as from the church council, from the breaking of bread, and from the (holy) kiss. But a member that has fallen into gross sins and vices, should be dealt with according to the word cf God, as expressed by the Apostle Paul, to wit: Not to keep company with such, no not to cat." AA'OIDANCE. 31 Y. M. 1843. Art. 5. When a brother is put in avoiilance, accor ling to the words of Paul, 1 Cor. 5, and his wife and children, being mem- bers in the church, have company with him, as it happens in a family, how is the church to treat them, or whether there is a difference be- tween the wife and the children, who are yet under the lawful ages, and how we arc to do when there is a difference of opinion about the withdraw- ing of the hand from those thtit are in avoidance ? Considered, though we are always truly sorry when such a case occurs where we must put a member in avoidance, and feel sincere compassion for those who suffer immediately under it; yet we cannot set aside this apostolic ordinance, and do really believe that the more strictly it is observed by all the mem- bers, and especially by the nearest relatives, the more powerful it would operate to the salvation of the fallen member. But in ease a wife would not withdraw from fellowship with her husband (being) in avoidance, it was always considered, that such a member could not break the bread of communion while so doing; and we do consider, that the children are in the same predicament, either to withdraw fellowship with the parent in avoidance, or not to break bread. And in regard to withdrawing the hand, it was considered, that when the church concludes to withdraw even the hand, the members should all unite in observing the same. Same Y. M. Art. 11. Whether a teacher that is not ordained can excommunicate a deacon or visiting brother, on but one brother's testi- mony, and with only twelve members in council ? The view of the brethren assembled is, that in consideration of the words of the ppostle, 1 Tim. 5 : 19, " Against an elder " (which word seems to be used in the New Testament sometimes in a more limited, and at other times a more general sense, and apparently including all those to whom is entrusted an office in the church,) " receive not an accusation, but before two or three witnesses." In consideration again, that as a brother that is not (yet) ordained, ought not (has not authority) to hold an election or to install ministers or deacons, so there ought to be none excommunicated without ordained brethren being present ; and lastly, because that in such a case all the members of the church, or as many as possible, ought to be present, we could not approve of such a proceeding. Our ancient brethren have taught us by precept and example, and e.vperience has c.-iifirmed their teaching to be true aud according to the gospel, tlic le^.s au- thority we try to assume the Ijetter we will gel along as houseki-eiicrs in the chuicli : hence, in such cases as the one stated in the aliove (lucstinn, where a minister or deacon has fallen under ilu- ceu.sui-e of the cliurcli, even where two ordained elders presided in such cliurch, they should not undertake such a case couceniii.g a co-laborer, but .should c;ill for some elders from other chuiches to act iu tlie case, so as to ''abstain from all appearance of evil," of exercising too much authority, or of acting with partiality, iScc. The wisdom of this course is so obvious, that it needs no further vomihent. Y. M. 1844. Art. 8. In a case where man and wife are both members, and it iio happens that the church would have occasion to hold one or the other in avoidance, and after being held thus, say two or more years, 32 AVOIDANCE. without 'manifesting any fruits of sincere repentance — which would be the mo£:t prudent course to take in behalf of the companion of such thus held in avoidance ? Considered, that though we sincerely pity the in- nocent party, if there has no change taken place in the state of the fallen member, there can be no change in the course of the church toward such a member. But of this each church must judge according to existing circumstances. See 2 Cor. 2 : 5. It is a very delicate raatter sometimes, to inquire too deeply into such a special case presented at yearly meeting, neither would there be time sufficient for such investigation; but it would be an interestiiig inquiry, and one that could not fail of good results, if properly conducted, namely this : Why it is that a member is held in avoidance for two or more years without manifesting any change? It seems to be almost impossible that a person could remain in such a condition without some change either for better or for worse, especially if the church and the family would observe the avoidance faithfully. There is cause for clos° self- examinaticn, particularly of those who coming into more or less frequent contact with such an offender in avoidance, to see whether they are not in the fault, that this ordinance should be ineffective for any length of time. Y. jM. 1846. Art. 6. Whether one that is called a brother, and has committed any gross crime, such as drunkenness, blasphemy or fornica- tion, &c , can continue to be a member of the body of Christ, if he con- fesses his fault, and promises to do better ? whether the church may for- give him, or whether he ought not to be expelled, until he shows forth fruits meet for repentance ? Considered, that we can conceive of extra- ordinary cases of such deep or thorough contrition of heart, similar to that kind of leprosy (see Lev. 13 : 12-17.) which broke out abroad in the skin, and the leprosy covered all the skin of him that had the plague, from his head even to his foot, and where the priest had to consider him clean — and so the church likewise may unanimously feel satisfied with such signs of genuine repentance, and may be willing to forgive at once on his full confession ; yet in most cases it is the safest way, in the first place to obey the instruction of the Apostle Paul (1 Cor. 6), and to ex- communicate such a member '-'with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, that the spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus." y. M. 1848. Art. 18. Whether we have any authority of liberating a person out of the avoidance without the person making application ? Considered, that there is to our knowledge no such authority in the gospel. Y. M. 1848. Art. 20. Whether three or more ordained elders have the authority of liberating out of avoidance, independent of the church? Considered, that it cannot be done properly without the counsel and con- sent of the church. Y. jM. 1848. (Indiana.) Art. 11. When the church disowns a mem- ber, so that he is set back from the salutation of the kiss and from church fellowship, how is the proper way to do with such members as come from other arms of the church, and knowing the standing of such disowned members, yet will still hold fellowship with such ? Considered, that in- asmuch the church of Christ is one body all over the world, and the word says, " Whatsoever ye shall bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, AVOIDANCE. 33 and whatsoever ye shall loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven j" hence, if one branch of this church disowns a member (legally, of course) then members from other (churches or) branches, knowing this, should hold them equally disowned. Y. M. 1849. Art. 27. To how great a degree must a brother sin and be degi aded, before the church can put him in avoidance according to the gospel ? and whether all dealings and communications of a temporal nature between such an individual and the members of the church should cease? Considered, that this subject h:is been often before the Y. M., and the views of the brethren then were read. But on the particular points of the present query we would refer our dear brethren to the wcrd of God, which is plain, explicit and sharper than a two-edged sword. Paul the Apostle says, Rom. 15 : 4, " Whatsoever things were written aforetime, were written for our learning ;" and he evidently refers in these words to the writings of the Old Testament. Now we find, Lev. 5 : 17, "If a soul sin, and commit any of these things which are forbidden to be done by the commandments of the Lord, though he wist it not, yet he is guilty, and shall bear his iniquity, and he shall bring a trespass-offering unto the priest, and it shall be forgiven him." From this we may learn, that when a member has trespassed against God and the truth, even in ignorance, it is his duty to come to the church, and bring his trespass- offering, such as David says, Ps. 51 : 17, " The sacrifices of God are a broken spirit : a broken and contrite heart, 0 God, thou wilt not des- pise ;" and the church, which according to 1 Pet. 2 : 9, is " a royal priest- hood," is to judge and receive his offering, and forgive him accordingly. Here are the words of Christ himself duly to be considered : " Whoseso- ever sins ye remit, they are remitted unto them ; and whosesoever sins ye retain, they are retained." John 20 : 23. Should, however, such a member that has trespassed, be not willing to bring his offering of acknowledgment of his fault, nor be willing to hear the church, then we may consider this as a rising, a scab, or bright spot, which eventually may turn into moral leprosy. Lev. 13 : 2, and in this case the priest (the church) had to shut him up, or, as Paul says in Thess. '6: 6, "Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, &c.;" and as our Lord taught us. Matt. 18 : 17, " If he neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican." This withdrawing, or shutting up from close commun- ion with the church in the salutation of the kiss, the breaking of bread and the secret counsel, is continued, until it appears to the satisfaction of the priest (or the church) whether that spot is leprosj' or not. Now if on examination the priest found that white spot somewhat dark, and that the plague did not spread in the skin, he was to pronounce him clean. So when a member begins to see and acknowledge his fault, as something dark, he may be reinstated again into full communion. ' 3 34 AVOIDANCE. " ]^ut when the raw flesh appeareth in him, and the leprosy is thus confirmed, notice, he shall not be shut up, for he is unclean. And the leper in whom the plague is, his clothes shall be rent, and his head bare, and he shall put a covering upon his upper lip, and shall cry, Unclean, unclean. He shall dwell alone; without the camp his habitation shall be." Lev. 13 : 14,45,46. So our ancient brethren considered, when the moral leprosy in a member was confirmed by raw works of the flesh, such as are described 1 Cor. 5:11; Gal. 5 : 19-21, &c., that the direc- tion (or command) of the (Lord and his) Holy Ghost by the mouth of the Apostle Paul was to be strictly and literally obeyed, namely, " not to keep company with such a one, no not to eat." Our brethren -were well aware of some commentators explaining these words as if they meant only not to have fellowship with such in sjiirifual matters, and not to eat with them the bread of communion. But the}' (our brethren) found it im- possible to believe that the church at Corinth should have continued in full fel- lowship such a person as is described in 1 Cor. 5: 1, so that they should have still broken the bread of communion with him, &c., even until the apostle re- proved them by this epistle. They (the brethren) also thought of the awful words, Rev. 21 : 18, 10, and so they adhered simply to the word as it reads, had no intercourse, no dealings of any kind with such person?, and did not eit with them at the same table, or out of llie same dish, at any common meal, while they were in this state of aToidance. Only acts of charity toward them our Ijrethren did not consider prohibited by the word of God. And these views we still hold in communion with our departed brethren. Y. M. 1850. Art. 20. If a member commits a fault, whether the church has the power according to the gospel, to put that member in avoidance without the assistance of another church ? Considered, that if there is a bishop in that church, they have the power in the case of a private member. But whether it is best and expedient to undertake such a solemn work, where family connections might interfere much with a fair and impartial trinl, without tLe assistance of another church and other bishops, the church should ser'ously consider and decide in the fear of the Lord — a church like that of Philadelphia (llov. 3: 8), where true 6/-o(AerZy ^oi'c dwells ; where the door is open for her sister churches at any time to enter; where humility acknowledges of hiil little strength, and is therefore willing to avail herself of all the help her sisters, though they have but little strengh too, may afford. Y. M. 1850. Art. 24. Can a member that is cut ofi" and kept in avoidance, be afterward released again from the bonds of excommunication without acknowledging the fault, or without coming and requesting to be released ? And in case members are released without confessing their faults, or desiring to be released, how shall other members conduct them- selves toward them ? Considered, that where a member has committed one of those faults mentioned by the Apostle Paul, 1 Cor. 6 (or 5), and has been put in avoidance, the church having sufficient evidence that he has ceased from those evils, and by his earnest request he may be released out of the bonds of avoidance. — Art. 33. Whether members who have been put in avoidance, can be released without their request ? Consid- ered, that they cannot. — Art. 35. If a brother transgress so as to be deemed guilty of avoidance, should he not be cited to appear before the BAILSHIP FOR CRDIINALS. 35 chui-ch in the presence of the witnesses, to hear the testimony given ? Considered, that he ought to be particularly requested to attend. — Art. 3G In case such member be found guilty, by whom should he be inform- ed ? Considered, that this is a duty incumbent on the ordained brethren. Art. 37. If it is proved by two or three brethren (witnesses) that a brother has been drinking to excess, yet not so much as to disable him from keeping on his feet; but has often before been charged, and also before been set back or put in avoidance, and still denies the charge; would he not come under the class of drunkards, or would it be prudent to hold him as a brother, or should he be expelled by the proof of four or five witnesses, though not members of the church? Considered, that no member should be put in avoidance without positive proof from members that he or she has been guilty of one of those mentioned by Paul, 1 Cor. 5 ; 11. — Art. 38. Have we a sufficient right according to the gospel, to put a man in avoidance who has already been put back from the kiss, the communion and the council, and disowned as a brother ? Considered, that the church has the power to do so. — Art. 40. Whether an ordained brother, who has been once in avoidance, can be restored again to his full office ? Considered, that a brother can be restored again to his full office by the voice of the church (as in a choice). Y. M. 1855. Art. 3. How is it considered, if a young brother and sister want to marry each other, and being opposed by their parents, mem- bers too, accomplish their design so late as to bring reproach upon them- selves and the church? Considered, that the young members should be dealt with according to the circumstances, so as to prove that the church is not participating in evil ; and the parents should also be admonished, if the church finds them in error. — Art. 23. How is it considered, if a church having no ordained elder, has a case of gross sin, such as is de- scribed 1 Cor. 5 : 11, and application is made to ordained elders to assist them, the elders making an appointment, and fail to attend ; has the church a right to put such members back, or ought the church to hold such transgressors as full members, until they can get ordained elders ? Considered, that the church may and ought to put them back provision- ally, when the crime is sufficiently proved, until ordained elders can at- tend. BAILSHIP FOR CRIMINALS. Y..M. 1848. (Indiana.) Art. 4. How would it be considered, if a man be put into the county prison for safe keeping until court, and a brother goes his security for his appearance in court, and releases him out of prison ? Considered, that a brother ought not to meddle with such matters without counseling the church. Becoming bail or surety for another was never thought advisable by the Brethren, from a consideration of the warnings contained in the word of God. See Prov. 6 : 1-5, " My son, if thou be surety for thy friend, if thou hast stricken thy 36 BAN— BAPTISM. hand with a str.anger, thou art snared with the words of thy mouth, thou art ta- ken with the words of thy mouth (or with the ;igning of thy name). Do this now, my son, and deliver thyself, when thou art come into the hand of thy friend ; go, humble thyself, and make sure thy friend. Give not sleep to thine eyes, nor slumber to thine eye lids. Deliver thyself as a roe from the hand of the hunter, and as a bird from the hand of the fowler." See also Prov. 11: 15, "He that is surety for a stranger shall smart for it ; and he that hateth suretyship is sure." Prov. 17 : 18, "A man void of understanding striketh hands, and becometh surety in the presence of his friends." Prov. 22 : 26. " Be not thou one of them that strikes hands, or of them that are sureties for debts." BAN. (See "Avoidance or Excommunication."') BAPTISM. We hold baptism, with the generality of Christian professors, as the initial or- dinance appointed by our Lord Jesus Christ, Matt. 28 : 19. &c., but cannot bap- tize any but such who profess to have repented of their sins, and to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, Mark 16 : 16, &c. With regard to the action, we believe that the word baptism means only immersion, as all Greek scholars are ready to admit, if they are candid and honest. The Greek term pa-ruo, i3a7rTtafia or paK- Ttaijog, means, however, being in the frequentative form, a repeated action. Hence, we adhere to trine immersion as the most ancient and original action. We are confirmed in this respect by the fact, that single immersion was first introduced full 600 years after A. D , and that only in Spain, while trine immersion, even in the Roman Church, prevailed in all other countries till about the time of the Re- formation, and is continued indeed to this day in the Roman Church at Milan; that the Greek Church, numbering more than sixty millions of professors, has al- ways practiced it until now ; and that the Church of England has trine immersion indicated in her Bcok of Common Prayer to this very day ; and that we have evi- dence that trine immersion was also the action in baptism practiced in the Lu- theran Church in the days of Reformation. "Whether such as had been baptized by single immersion among other denominations, could be received among us without that baptism, we be- lieve fully required by the gospel. Y. M. 1804. Art. 6. About persons, who are among the English Bap- tists, and have been baptized by them, and come now, and desire to be admitted (in our church) ; whether they ought to be baptized again, ac- cording to the true order of baptism, or if they should prefer it, whether we would receive them without being baptized again ? In consideration of the Scriptui'e, and especially because the Lord said to Moses, "Look that thou make them after their pattern, which was showed thee in the mount" (Exod. 25 : 40), it has been concluded with one accord, that when such come to us, we should give them in all things good instruc- tion according to the gospel, yea, according to the Scriptures; and when they believe, and are willing to obey from the heart, that form of doctrine according to the counsel of God, they ought to be baptized in the proper order, because there have occurred diiferent examples, that heretofore persons had been received by the Brethren, who thought then they could be satisfied with their singlo backward immersion, but afterward they were more enlightened, have deemed their baptism as imperfect, and to put their conscience at rest, they requested and had to be baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, by a trine immersion. BAPTISM. 37 Y. M. 1821. Art. 6. Whether members (persons) might be received into the church, who have been but once immersed (without baptizing them in the manner we believe it ought to be done according to the gos- pel) ? It was considered, that a threefold immersion is the true baptism ; but if such persons would be content with their baptism, and yet acknow- ledge the Brethren's order as right, we would leave it over to them, and receive them with the laying on of hands and prayer. Y. M. 1828. Art. 6. Whether a person may be received into the church, having been immersed but once? it is the counsel to be better that they should be baptized again in the true order. — Art. 7. Whether we had a right to cause a candidate for baptism to make a vow ? it was con- sidered, that it is according to the gospel to receive them in the order of the Brethren as usual. Y. M. 1833. Art. 1. Whether we are to immerse at baptism once or thrice '! It was considered, that we cannot deem any other baptism as valid according to the word of God, but a threefold immersion. Y. M. 1831. Art. -1. Whether we could receive into our church a person that has been immersed once backward, without baptizing him again ? Considered, that though it has been done before, still we believe that the best and safest way is to baptize them right and according to the proper order (as we believe), and that hereafter it should not be done otherwise. — Art. 10. How it is considered, when a member who was re- ceived after having been baptized with only one immersion backward, without receiving baptism according to our order, moves into another church, and there is required to be baptized ? Answer in foregoing article 4. Y. M. 1835. Art. 1. How it is viewed to receive colored people (into our church) ? Considered, to make no difference on account of color. Y. M. 1835. (Miami.) Art. 13. What is the order to receive appli- cants for baptism ? It is necessary that there should be self-knowledge, repentance and faith, together with scriptural instruction, and then that it may be done with the counsel of the church. Y. M. 1837. Art. 8. When persons desire to be received by baptism in- to the church, whether it be necessary to instruct them before baptism with regard to the swearing of oaths, to the going to war and the like, that ac- cording to our views are forbidden in the gospel ? The advice is, that such persons ought, if possible, to be visited before baptism, and by all means to be previously instructed in the following points, viz. of the taking of oaths, going to war or to muster, to use the power of the law contrary to the gospel, and to conform to the fashions of this world in apparel, and the like ; and that they ought to state before their reception their willingness to refrain from all such things. — Art. 12. How it is viewed to receive persons into the church in case of sickness and bodily infirmity, without baptism ? Considered, that we have no express word for it, and that it would be more advisable and more safe to direct them 38 BAPTISM. simply to the mercy of God ia Christ. Yet in certain (extraordinary or) singular cases, we would not set bounds, but advise all teachers (ministers) to be careful to do nothing without the counsel of their fellow laborers, and if it can be possible, of their church. Y. M. 1844. Art. 4. In regard to the dilference in the form of words, which the Brethren use in baptism, it was after a free discussion consid- ered, since in the practice of a threefold immersion of the kneeling can- didate, and in the use of the words of our Saviour, Matt. 28 : 19, "In THE NAJIE OF THE FATHER, AND OF THE SoN, AND OF THE HoLY Ghost," we are all perfectly agreed to lay the matter" down as heretofore, and to bear with one another in love, yet so that the teachers of one and the same church or district ought to use the same form. See 1 Cor. 1 : 10. Y. M. 1845. Art. 4. Where is the proper place for asking the can- didates for baptism concerning their faith in Christ — in or out of the water ? Considered, that the most proper place for making a public con- fession of our faith in Christ, is in the water, immediately before bapti,^m. Sea 1 Tim. 6 : 12. Y. M. 1848. (Ohio.) Art. 3. How are we to receive members into the church from their first application until they are baptized according to the gospel ? Considered, that inasmuch as there has been hitherto a difierence in the pi-actice and in the form of words used in this ordinance, and inasmuch it is desirable to be in all such matters of one mind, and do and speak the same things, this meeting has unanimously agreed upon the following course and form of words, and recommend the same for adoption in all the churches : First, the applicant to be examined by two or more brethren ; then the case to be brought before the church council, before whom the applicant is to declare his agreement with us in regard to the principles of being (non-resistant) non-swearing, and non-conforming to the world; then in meeting or at the water to read from Matt. 18 : 10-22, in public, the candidates being asked if they will be governed by these gospel rules. Then prayer at the water, and in the water the following questions to be asked : Dost thou believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, and that he has brought from heaven a saving gospel ? Answer — Yea. Dost thou willingly renounce Satan and all his pernicious ways, and all the sinful pleasures of this world ? Answer — Yea. Dost thou covenant with God in Christ Jesus to be fiiithfal until death ? Answer — Yea. (Then the administrator continues^ — "Upon this thy confession of faith, which thou hast made before God and these witnesses, thou shalt — for the remission of thy sins — be baptized in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." After baptism, while in the water, the administrator to lay his hands upon the head of the candidate, and to offer up a prayer to God in his behalf ; and then the member is BAPTISM. 39 to be received by hand and kiss (if a brother by the brethren, and if a sister by the sisters, and by the opposite sex only by the hand) into church fellowship. Y. M. 1848. Art. 5. Ought we to receive any person into the church without baptism, having been baptized by any other order of people ? Con- sidered, that this yearly meeting advise to be very careful in this matter, and give it as their unanimous conclusion, that it would be better to ad- mit no person into the church without being baptized by the Brethren. Y. M. 1851. Art. 17. Whether tlie form of words used in the ordi- nance of baptism, as laid down in the annual meeting, A. D. 1848, could not be reconsidered ? Considered, to leave it as the minutes of 1848 have it. Y. M. 1853. Art. 45. Inasmuch as there had been a difference in the form of words in administering baptism, settled and brought to a union (?) some years ago, could we not also come to a full union aad agreement with regard to feet washing, the Lord's supper, &c., so that a member from one section would find in every other section the same celebration in manner and form as at home? Considered, to refer this to the next yearly meeting. Y. M. 1855. Art. 6. Is it consistent with the gospel to receive per- sons into the church with hand and kiss, when circumstances will not permit baptism to be performed '( Considered, that it is not according to the gospel to consider persons as members of the church without bap- tism ; yet they should be encouraged, and if they wish it, their cases may be taken into consideration by the church in council, and they be re- ceived as candidates for baptism, which is to be performed as soon as circumstances will permit. — Art. 20. How is it considered best to do with a brother or brethren, that will not use the words in administering baptism, as it was decided at the yearly meeting near Wooster, Ohio, ia 1 848, " for the remission or forgiveness of sin ?" Considered, that the decision of said council should be observed, as it was observed by many brethren from time immemorial, and that those brethren who will not submit to it should be admonished for love sake (for union's sake) and (more than all) for the word's sake, to comply. Y. M. 1857. Art. 20. Do not those administrators of baptism, who make the candidates for baptism renounce all the world, require too much of the candidates, since we all have more or less to do with the world ? Would it not be more proper to require of them to renounce only what is contrary to the gospel ? Ans. — The third article of the minutes of 1848 contains the proper renunciation of the world. The passage in that article, referred to here, reads thus: "Dost thou renounce all the sinful 2)leasures of this world?" Y. M. 1858. Art. 1. Can a person be received into the church, who is uncle to his wife ? Or do the brethren think the gospel will not allow of such a person becoming a member of the church ? Considered, that 40 BAPTISM. if he is uncle to his wife by marriage, he may be received, if by blood relation, he should net be — Art. 31. Is it contrary to the gospel for brethren to hold meetings for a number of days in succession, in one place, in order to preach the pure word of God, and to administer the ordinance of baptism to those who believe the word and receive it? Considered, not contrary to the gospel, if the believer is proceeded with according to the gospel, and the order of the brethren as given by the annual meeting of 1848, Art. 3. — Art. 41. inasmuch as there has been great confusion in various branches of the church during the past year relative to the man- ner of taking in members, as this has been done in many different ways, would brethren not consider it prudent and consistent with the gospel, to have a unity of practice throughout the church, and if so, what shall that practice be '/ Shall it be the order laid down in the minutes of 1818, or will the brethren draft a new order? Considered, that we will continue the order laid down in the minutes of 1848, which is as follows: (see page 38.) Y. M. 1859. Art. 3. How is it considered if a minister would bup- licly teach that water baptism is not for the remission of sins, but that a person must have an evidence within that his sins are pardoned before he is a fit subject for baptism ; and also would differ with brethren in the mode of electing brethren to the ministry, and likewise claim that all members, both male and female, have a right to admonish and exhort? Ans. — Considered, that it is not according to Acts 2 : 38, and 22 : 16, to teach that a person must have an evidence within that his sins are pardoned before he is a fit subject for baptism ; and that we know of no bet- ter way for the brethren to elect their ministers than that which has been practiced heretofore. And concerning members exhorting without being authorized by the church, we think they should not do so in the church in our public or general meetings, according to 1 Cor. 14 : 38-35. Art. 5. Inasmuch as the ceremony vised by the brethren in receiving members into the church is thought by a large proportion of the brethren to be of too great length, might it not be shortened? And instead of the questions being asked in the water, would it not be more consistent to ask them in the house or on the bank of the river or stream ? Ans. — We do not consider it good to make any alterations from the present prac- tice of the brethren. Y. M. 1860. Art. 4. Shall it be an order among the brethren, to re- ceive persons into the church as members, when they are sick, without baptism, with the promise that they will be baptized when they get well? Ans. — Let persons who. wish to be received into the church, and who are too sick to have the ordinance of baptism administered to them, be con- sidered as candidates for baptism to receive the ordinance as soon as cir- cumstances will permit, but not in full membership until they are bap- tized. Art. 11. Is it consistent with the order of the brethren and the gos- BAPTISM. 41 pel, to receive a member into the church without the counsel of the church, when it is possible to have a council ? Ans. — It is not consistent. Y. 31. 18G2. Art. 21. Would it not be better, instead of asking the consent of each individual member concerning the reception of an appli- cant, to make the request general, that is, ask the church as a body whether they are willing to receive such applicant, and if they are, let silence give consent, and if not, that member who is not willing to re- ceive such applicant shall have full privilege to state his or her objections '{ Answer. — This is left optional to each arm of the church. Y. M. 1862. Art. 27. A person was baptized and thus became a mem- ber of the church ; afterward thought he was not in the right state of mind when he had been baptized, and felt that if he would die in this state, he would be lost, and then made application to be re-baptlzcd. The brethren in the congregation tried to reconcile him, and could not ; and (they) also sent strange and elder brethren to talk with him, who also failed to satisfy him. After repeated and continued application for re-baptism, a brother, without the counsel of the church, baptized him over again, when he became reconciled. Now did the brother who re-baptizcd the person do his duty ? Answer. — We think he did not do his duty, but did wrong. Art. 63. Will the brethren in annual council consider it right for ministering brethren to receive members into the church without requir- ing them to lay off the fashions of the world in regard to apparel, and to conform to the order of the brethren ? Answer. — We consider it would not be right to do so; see Komans 12 : 3. Art. 67. When a person, having received baptism in the same way that we perform it, but by a member of a different denomination, wishes to be united to the Brethren, must such a person be rc-baptized in order to be received into our church ? Answer. — We refer to the minutes of the annual meeting of 1848, Art. 5. [" Ought we to receive any person in- to the church without baptism, having been baptized by any other order of people y Considered, that this yearly meeting advise to be very care- ful in this matter, and give it as their unanimous conclusion, that it would be better to admit no person into the church without first being baptized by the brethren."] Y. M. 1864. Art. 12. Inasmuch there is a difference of opinion rel- ative to the applicant for baptism declaring his agreement with the church in regard to the principles of non-resistance, non-swearing and non-con- formity to the world, whether this should be done in the presence of the whole congregation, or of the church only. We wish a decisive an- swer, and not only a reference to the minutes of 1848 and 18.58, as we have referred to them, but still get into diflBculty. Answer. — We think it should be done in the presence of the church only. Such questions seem to proceed either from new churches or young members, who are somewhat unacquainted with the ancient established order of the church. 42 BAPTISM OF THE HOLY GHOST— BEARDS. The answer is exactly according to that order ; and the reason why the brethren would rather refer back to former occasions, is simply thi^, that our bretliren, even the oldest, instead of loving and assuming authority for themselves, would rather submit to another authority. Art. 17. Is it wrong to baptize or immerse sick persons in a house ? Answer. — We consider it is not advisable to do so whenever it is possible to avoid it. Art. 25. Is it in accordance with the gospel and the order of the brethren, for the church to receive and take candidates in with (or, by) hand and kiss previous to the reading of Matt. 18, and then baptize them upon their public confession ? Answer. — We think it is neither in ac- cordance with the gospel or the order of the brethren to do so. Art. 20. Is it according to the gospel and the order of the brethren, to receive and baptize into the church such as are in the military service, bearing arms in this war, or to go into the camps and baptize such, and let them remain in the service ; or, should they not first get a full discharge, before they can be received into the church by baptism ? Answer. — We cannot encourage such proceedings; but in case of ex- treme sickness, and when there is a promise to shed no more blood, we will let the churches applied to decide what shall be done ; but let the privileges of the church be acceded to by all candidates. BAPTISM OF THE HOLY GHOST. Y. M. 1858. Art. 37. How is it when one brother preaches that there is no baptism of the Holy Ghost now, but that it is only the gift of the Holy Ghost which believers receive, while another brother prays for the Lord to baptize with the Holy Ghost ? Answer. — We think it best for no brother to preach that there is no baptism of the Holy Ghost now, but in praying we should pray for the gift of the Holy Ghost. It would be advisable for old and young ministers to heed the adnonition of the Apostle Paul, 1 Cor. 1 : 1 J, when he says, " Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thiug, &c.," and to abide by the simple declaration of the word of God, and whatever truth can be fairly and directly educed from it. By this we might escape from all appa- rent jarrings and coutradictions in our discourses. Most of our difl'erences and disputes arise from not heeding said admonition of the apostle. AVhen .John the Baptist told the multitude, speaking of Jesus, "He shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost," Matt. 3: II, Mark 1 : 8, Luke 3 ; 16, and the Saviour just before his ascension promised the same thing, Acts 1 : 5, and fulfilled it on Pentecost not only to the disciples, but not long after to those who had become believers, Jews in Jerusalem, Acts 4: 31, and Gentiles in Cesarea, Acts 10 : 44, and 11 : 15 : and when we consider that God is unchangeable, and that Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, to-day and forever ; and that the Holy Ghost operates now as eflectually in the conversion of sinners and sanctification of believers, though perhaps in a less degree — we believe that the promises of God beloug to us and our children, as well as to the primitive age, and that if we were united in spirit, heart and soul, as the apostles were at Pentecost, we might expect similar Pente- costal blessings. BEARDS. On this head we give an extract from the history of the Greek Church, in which men, especially priests and bishops, always wore their beards, until the BEARDS. 43 Russian Emperor Peter, in the seventeenth century, forbade its use. "The bc;ird was indeed one of the fundiiuiental characteristics of the ancient Eastern faith. Michael Cerularius bad laid it down in the eleventh century as one of the luiniary differences between the Greeic and Latin Churches. To shave the beard was pro- nounced at the council of Moscow, in the seventeenth century, a sin whicli even the blood of the martyrs could not expiate. It was defended, it is still defended, by texts of Scripture, by grave precedents, by ecclesiastical history. The Levii- ical law commands us not to cut the hair or the beard. Man was made in the image of God ; is the image of God to be defaced ? Our Saviour was (undoubt- edly) bearded." Stanley's Lectures on the History of the Eastern Churches, page 512, &c. Y.M. 1804. Art. 4. Whether upon request a brother might be ordaiued as a bishop, who shaves off his beard ? it was considered, that inasmuch God made man with a beard ; and again, God commanded his people iu the law not to cut oiF the beard ; and it was especially required of tlie priests of God not to mar the corners of the beard ; and also Christ, our Master and precursor, together with his disciples, has left us an example herein — in consideration of these and other scriptures and examples, it (the ordination) could not readily be done in a sound faith and with an unoffcnded conscience. Y. M. 1822 Art 1. Whether a brother might be set forward to bap- tize and break bread, who does not wear his beard j it was considered, that according to the image of God (in which man was created), and accord- ing to the image of Christ, we ought to (leave our beard undisturbed or) wear our beard (at least in part), and that no brother should be so far advanced who could not deny himself in this matter. Y. M. 1835. Art. 3. On same subject, and decided similarly. I''. M. 184G. Art. 11. How it is considered by this yearly meeting, whether brethren, who do not wear their beard, are to be advanced to administer baptism and the breaking of bread, or may even be ordained? Considered, that we are much grieved, how also in this respect a devia- tion and want of self-denial is becoming apparent here and there, and it would be well and laudable if we would not only keep in remembrance, but put also in practice the example and advice of our beloved old breth- ren. In 1822 — twenty-four years ago — the query had been asked; see in full above. In 1804 — forty-two years ago — the query came up; as given also above. Y. M. 1854. Art. 19. How will it be considered, if a brother serving in the oflBce of a deacon does not let his beard grow, and when admon- ished, opposes and asks scripture on that question '{ Considered, that brethren should bear and forbear (one another) iu love, and give him the best scripture ground they can. Y. M. 1862. Art. 12. How it is considered for brethren to wear the beard on the upper lip, they being conscientious in doing so ? Answer. If a brother does not shave any, we would leave it with his conscience ; but if he lets it stand on his upper lip only, we consider it wrong. 44 BISHOP, OR ELDER. BISHOP, OR ELDER. By these terms we understand that officer in the church, who after having served as a minister, first simply as a preacher of the word, and secondly us an administrator of the ordinance of baptism and the communion for a longer or shorter terra of years, as the church saw and sees fit, and doing so to the accept- ance and satisfaction of the church — has been chosen by the unanimous choice of all the members of (he church, present at the occasion, in presence of at least two elders from adjoinin!^ churches, to be overseer of his church, and also to exercise his office wherever he may come — the field is the world— for the con- verting of sinners and the bnilding up of the church of Christ. Concerning unan- imity, it was always considered prudent in such case (and would be also in other cases), if any valid objection would be raised and substantiated by at least two members of good standing, that the ordination had best be postponed, inasmuch as the word of God says. Acts 20: 28, "Over the which (all the flock) the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers to feed the church of God," &c. Now, since we could not know in case of a divi-ion in the church by a majority and a minority, whether 'man" or "the Holy Ghost'' had made the overseer (or in any other case the decision), we aim at unanimity. If, therefore, those who conduct the choice upon examination find that the objections presented are well founded in Scripture, in tliis case for instance on 1 Tim. S: 1-7, Tit. 1 : 6, &c.,and in fact by sufficient evi- dence, then it is best to stop proceedings, and postpone until the objections may have ceased to exist. On ihe contrary, if not well founded, the objectors should be admonished to withdraw them, and unite with the church in consenting to the ordination, and if they should refuse to do so, the conductors of the choice must exercise their own best judgment, without partiality on either side and in the fear of the Lord, whether to go on with the ordinat on or not, and by taking no account of unfounded objections, declare the voice of the church unanimous in case of only one or two dissenters. The still better way would be, if the church would bo informed of the case, and the church, in th"", absence of the objectors, would decide it unanimously, and then the ordination proceeded with in the usual way by the laying on of hands. Y. M. 1804. Art. 4. (See " Beard.") Y. M. 1821. Art. 1. Whether an ordained brother (bishop) may col- lect debts by the power of law ? It was considered, that no brother, much less one ordained, has a right to do so according to the gospel doc- trine, not even for another. Y. M. 1821. Art. 2. Whether an ordained or private brother may serve as executor, when he knows before that the law must be used, was likewise considered, that according to gospel doctrine it should not be. But inasmuch many brethren are involved in this way, the counsel is to have patience with them, until they can extricate themselves, yet mean- while not to break bread with them. But since an executorship is very burdensome, it has been deemed necessary to adopt a remedy to lessen the burden; and since every father has a right to make a will as he sees proper, without hindrance from the powers that be, to divide and distrib- ute his property, and also to select his executors, and to charge them what and in what manner they should do — they might put in their wills some- thing like the following clause, namely: I nominate and appoint A. B. to be sole executor of my estate (this my last will and testament), to set- tle, pay off, and collect, as far as the rules of our church and the gospel will admit of, &c. Y. M. 1836. Art. 4. When a bishop is old and too feeble to serve in his office fully as he ought, whether (the church) would have a right to select another ? the counsel is, to go to counsel with the nearest churches. BISHOP, OR ELDER. 45 and if, looking on the proposition favorably, and the old bishop and liis church would be of one mind, then it might be done. Y. M. 1846. Art. 11. (See under foregoing heading, page 43. See also, '■^Authority of a Bishop.") Y. M. 1846, Tennessee. Art. 4. How is it considered for a bishop, with a few members, to expel a member without taking the counsel' of the church ? Considered, that in all such important matters the church must be counseled. Art. 6. Whether a deacon can be ordained to the office of a bishop ? Considered, that we have no authorityTor so doing. See 1 Tim. 3 : 1-7 ; ch. 5 : 22. Y. 31. 1849. Art. 9. What is the duty of a bishop toward his church, and the duty of the church toward the bishop or bishops, in case the bishop commits an error; is it to be overlooked more in him than in an- other brother in office, or in a private member ? Ccnsidered, that elders who rule well should be counted worthy of double honor, and that overseers should not undertake anything of importance without counsel of the church ; and if there should be a general complaint of the church against him, he is to acknowledge his fault before the church like an- other member, and should not be spared; for "if the eye be evil, the whole body shall be full of darkness." Still it was always the advice of our old brethren, that in any case where laboring (ministering) brethren were in fault, strange and impartial brethren of experience should be called to assist in the investigation and justification of the same. Y. M. 1849. Art. 36. (See page 25.) Y. M. 1850. Art. 40. Whether an ordained brother, who had been once in avoidance, can be restored again to his fall office? Considered, that a brother can be restored again to his full office by the voice of the church (as in a choice). Y. M. IBM. Art. fi. A query concerning the ordaining of elders. Considered, that the ordination of elders is of the utmost importance to the church, and should always be under the special guidance of the Holy Spirit, who will teach and remind a church of the right person and the proper time for ordination ; that there should be a full union of the church and the elders present on the subject ; and that where there is any serious objection according to the word of God (see 1 Tim. 8 : 1—7 ; Titus 1 : 7), the elders and the church should be cautious (not) to proceed, if the ob- jection could not be removed. Y. M. 1852. Art. 9. What is the duty of a bishop, who has the over- sight of an adjoining congregation, in which there is no householder and only one speaker '( — and has that church liberty to call elders, and have a bishop or speaker appointed ? Considered, that it is the duty of a bishop to attend to the necessities of such church, and if he neglects his duty, such church, if unanimous, may call other elders to assist them. Y. M. 1853. Art. 4. Is it consistent with the gospel and its prin- 46 BONDS OR NOTES, BUYING AND SELLING. ciples, as professed by our brotherhood, when a brother is chosen to the ministry only, not being authorized to baptize, that the ordained elder of the congregation should forward such brother, without consulting the church ? Considered, that all power, under God, is vested in the church (composed of elders, ministers, deacons and private members), and that therefore the church should in all such cases be consulted. — Art. 11. What is the most proper or scriptural mode of ordaining an elder or bishop ? By the voice of the church, over which the elder is to be ordained for preside), or by the wish or declaration of the elders or bishops of neigh- boring churches ? Answered, by referring to the minutes of 1851, Art. 6. (See above.) Y. 31. 1855. Art. 17. If two brethren were chosen at one and the game time as ministers in the first degree, and some time afterward ad- vanced together to the second degree, and in course of time the church is in need of an overseer or bishop, can these two brethren both be ordained as such, or only one ? Considered, that in such a case both brethren may be ordained, provided there be no sufficient cause known to prevent it. Y. M. 1858. Art. 56. Is it advisable for ordained brethren to ordain a ministering brother to the office of elder or bishop, who permits hig children, even while under lawful age, to wear all manner of jewelry, and to learn instrumental music at boarding schools, &c. ? Considered, not advisable. 1 Tim. 2 : 9 ; 3 : 4, 5. BONDS OR NOTES, BUYING AND SELLING. Y. M. 1810. Art. 1. About brethren who intend selling bonds, it was considered, that it should not be done without the counsel of the church. Y. 31. 1817. Art. 6. Whether we may sell a note (or bond) or not? Considered, that no member should sell a note without the consent of the debtor. Y. 31. 1827. Art. 7. With regard to selling bonds, it was considered, that none should be sold by which poor people might be oppressed ; but since circumstances are so different, the church should be counseled (asked for counsel in any case.) Y. 31. 1858. Art. 21. Is it right according to the gospel for brethren to purchase notes from brethren or others, and shave them at fifteen per cent, or more? Considered, that it is not according to the gospel for brethren to do so. — Art. 30. How is it considered, if a brother has a note against another poor brother, who cannot pay, and the brother who has the note sells it to his son, who is no member of the church, and he col- lects the debt by law, and causes the poor brother's property to be sold, the brother who sold the note justifying himself in doing as he did? What is to be done in such a case ? Considered, that the brother who did so, committed a great fault, and that he should make restitution to the poor brother to the satisfaction of the church. BORROWING FROM BANKS— CARPETS. 47 Y. M. 1864. Art. 16. Is it right and according to the gospel for a brother to invest money in government bonds ? Ans. — We consider it not wrong to do so. BORROWING FROM BANKS. Y. 31. 1847. Art. 8. Whether it may be proper and agreeable with the gospel for a brother to borrow money from banks or speculating money- lenders, for the purpose of buying and droving cattle, sheep and horses, or for buying wheat or other produce, and transporting the same to the Atlantic cities or other public markets, for the purpose of making gain or profit? Considered, that we in general council (assembled) would advise any (and every) brother not to engage largely in trading, as there is great danger, both in a temporal and in a spiritual point of view. See 1 Tim. 5 : 9, 10. BREAKING OF BREAD. (Sec " Communio-n.") BREWERY KEEPING. Y. M. 1827. Art. 11. How it is considered, if a brother keeps a brewery, and makes strong beer ? Considered, though it could not be directly forbidden to a brother, but ought to be left to his own conscience, and (yet we wish) to advise him, that the safest way would be, not to carry on such a business from which may arise so many and great dis- orders. BUTCHERING. Y. M. 1850. Art. 7. Is a brother, being a full member in the church, allowed to purchase cattle and other animals, and following butchering, hire or rent a stall in a market house, and attend market as a butcher every market morning? Considered, that a brother engaged in butcher- ing in the manner stated in the question is surrounded with many diffi- culties and temptations, and that we would advise brethren not to do so. CAMP MEETINGS, ATTENDING. Y. M. 1848. Art. 11. Can it be considered prudent or profitable for membsrs to frequent camp meetings or protracted meetings from time to time ? Unanimously considered, not to be profitable for members to do so. CARPETS. Y. M. 1827. Art. 8. How it is considered to lay carpets in (our) houses ? It was considered, that it belongs to the grandeur (highness) of this world, and that it will not become a follower of Jesus to garnish his house in this manner, but rather that he should adorn his house as may be consistent with lowliness. Y. M. 1828. Art. 9. Whether brethren may have carpets in their houses, was considered, that it cannot and should not be, because it leads to elevation (pride). 48 CARRIAGES— CERHFICATES OF MEMBERSHIP. While such improvements were yet new, and only found in the houses of the great an'i rich in the world, it was proper for brethren to advise as above ; but after such improvement had become a cimmon thjng, and it was a convenience generally known, there was no further objection to their introduction. Thus it was almost in all cases. CARRIAGES. Y. M. 1828. Art. 2. "Whether we may conform ourselves to the world with uaneccs.sary things on our carriages ? Considered, that it cannot be. (See foregoing note.) CERTIFICATES OF MEMBERSHIP. Y. M. 1788. Art. 2. The next was almost equally inportant, inas- much it has happened that members have moved from one section of the country to another, and improprieties had been committed by them ia the place from whence they moved, which are such as reflect no honor on the doctrine of the Lord, nor either on (our) Christian profession, so that we had to withdraw from them the kiss of charity, and they con- cealed this at the place where they had moved to, and sometimes it was discovered afterward, so that offence of fender minds might result there- from ; we conclude likewise, and find it more proper and perfect, that such removing family or member should bring a certificate from the church where they leave, to the church to which they move. Y'^. M. 1834. Art. 5. Concerning a certain brother's certificate — Art. 15. Whether a certificate could be given to a brother minister, who moves away from his church, without 2)aying his debts ? Special advice given, but not noted. Y. M. 1841. Art. 12. What is to be done with a brother or member, wbo removes into another church without bringing a certificate of mem- bership along, and upon being asked for it, is ofi'ended by the request ? Considered, that, as it has been decided often heretofore, it is requisite for members that remove from one church into another, to bring a testi- monial or certificate along of their standing in the church whence they came, and that they ought not to be offended at being asked for the same. Should they refuse still to procure a certificate, the church to which they came would have a right to (inquire further and) ascertain their standing, before receiving them to full membership. Y. M. 1849. Art. 12. Concerning the propriety and necessity of recommendations for members that move from one church to another ? Considered, that the ministers in the various churches should see (to it) that none of their members should move away without a recommenda- tion ; that no church is bound to receive (such) a member without recom- mendation, and that the recommendation be signed by not less than two or three witnesses, according to the gospel. That the apostles gave writ- ten recommendations, see Rom 16: 1, 2; 1 Cor. 16: 10, 11; 2 Cor. 8: 23; Eph. 6: 21, 22; Col. 4:7-9; 1 Thes. 3 : 2, &c. CHOICE AND INSTALLATION OF MINISTERS, &c. 49 Y. M. 1853. Art. 24. Is it right to give a certificate to a brother, when he moves out of the church district witliout paying his debts, or giving general satisfaction to his creditors ? Considered, that if the church is satisfied of the brother's having been honest, and having done all he could to pay his debts and satisfy his creditors, he ought to have a certificate. But should the brother be able and not willing to pay his debts, or give, or try to give satisfaction to his creditors, he should by no means have a certificate of full membership in the church. Y. M. 1862. Art. 20. What shall be done in such a case as follows : There are a brother and sister living here who claim to have stood in full fellowship with a church called Dunkards, in Lycoming county, Pa. When asked for a certificate, the brother said the church from which they moved did not give certificates, allowing that their coaduct should suffice, and this (conduct) has been quite satisfiictory to the members of this church ? Answer. — We consider it right in all cases, when mem- bers move from one arm of the church to another, that they shall present to the church wherein they wish to reside, a certificate to prove their membership in the church from whence they came, or give satisfaction to the church of which they wish to become members. CHOICE AND INSTALLATION OF MINISTERS, &c. Y. M. 1835. Art. 2. How it is viewed to elect brethren for the min- istry by lot? Considered, to abide the manner of holding a choice hith- erto observed. (Given from memory, as a witness present.) Y. M. 1837. Art. 4. How it is considered to hold an election without an or ^ained brother ( ilder) being present ? As to holding elections, it is considered, that no election ought to be held without the presence of (two or) at least one ordained brother. Y. M. 1838. x\rt. 12. Whether in case that brethren, who are called to some ministry, move from one church into another, and arc leceived with their office by the church to which they have removed, whctiier the sisters, their wives, ought to be received with them, as in the case of an election ? Considered, that it would be good to receive the sisters also with them. Y. M. 1838. Art. 9. Whether we have the right to appoint deacons, without laying hands on them according to tl^e example of the apostles. Acts 6:6? Considered, aLd resolved to postpone the further considera- tion of this query to the next annual meeting. Y. M. 1839. Art. 8. With regard to the laying on of hands on dea- cons, it was concluded to leave it as heretofore. See also Y. M. 1844 : 1 ; 1845:11 ; 1846 : 8 ; Tenn. 6. Y. M. 1840. Art. 1. Whether it be agreeable to the gospel, as the brethren do hold elections for teachers and deacons? Considerci), that our mode to hold elections is according to the gospel, and that we do not ace how to improve it. 4 50 CHURCH COUNCIL. Y. M. 1848. Art. 4. How to forward a brother to the mlui.stry as speaker according to the gospel ? Considered, that the church is exhort- ed to prayer to guide them in a proper choice, not discussing the subject with each other, but keeping their thoughts before God only ; two ordain- ed elders to be invited by the church to hold the election, who shall pre- side (at the election) and declare the one having the highest number of votes as chosen; the brother so chosen, having declared his willingness to fulfill the duties laid on him, is then received with hand and kiss. Art. 7. How to make arrangements that in every church brethren be authorized to baptize and serve at communion tables? Considered, to leave this to the judgment of the churches, with the advice of neigh- boring ordained elders, whether they think it necessary or expedient. Y. M. 1848. Art. IG. About the laying on of hands on deacon's, it was unanimously considered, to postpone the discussion of this subject in- definitely, until there is reason to hope that it may be done calmly and without prejudice. Y. M. 1858. Art. 42. How is it considered if a member moves off some distance and be absent a while, and then return on a visit, and then while at the place at which he formerly resided, conducting himself either becoming or unbecoming a follower of Christ, the church gives him per- mission to exhort or preach, by taking silence for consent ? Considered, not according to the order of the brethren to do so. Y. M. 1862. Art. 4. In installing ofiicial members into office in the church, is there to be any difference observed between near relations ? Answer. — There is no difference to be observed. Y. M. 1862. Art. 50. Is it advisable to hold an election for a minis- ter or deacon in one part of a congregation, in that in which it is most needed, and none but the members in that part voting, it being too small to form a separate church, providing the whole church consents to hold such an election ? Answer. — We consider it advisable to do so. CHURCH COUNCIL. Y. M. 1845. Art. 8. IIow is it considered, if a brother will rebel against the counsel held at council meetings, and say it is an abomination to God? Considered, that such a brother should be visited and exhort- ed, and if he would not hear and obey the admonition, he could not be held as a brother. Y. M. 1848. Art. 26. Whether it is proper in all cases to ask coun- sel before giving a letter of recommendation ? Considered, to be best always first to take the counsel of the church. Y. M. 1848, Indiana. Art. 7. How it is viewed, when persons living in one district request to be baptized and received into church-fellow- ship in the other district, whether it is proper to receive them without counsel of the district in which they live ? Considered, that we deem it advisable, and it has been the general course of the brethren, in a case CHURCHES. 51 where a person made application for baptism in a meeting out of the dis- trict in which the applicant lives, to hold counsel with the members of that church in whose bounds he resides. Y. M. 1856. Art. 9. How is it considered, where there is a church with a bishop and two speakers, one authorized to baptize, &c., and the other not, and a case of difficulty occurs between two members, and is brought before the church, those three ministers being present ; but the two first being relatives to the parties, they authorize the third to attend to the case, and present it before the church ; the question is, would it be considered legal ? Considered legal. The apostle informs us, that though things may be lawful, they ore not always expedient. The position of the old brethren was accordingly, and they would ia such a case have called brethren from other churches to act in it. Y. M. 18.57. Art. 13. What right have any two or three churches to reconsider the action of another church, and that without an y represent- ation from the church upon whoso decision they sit in judgment, arid then reinstate members which said church had excluded? Answer. — "We consider that one branch of the church has no right to restore a mem- ber to his place in the church, when he had been excluded by another branch of the church, without the concurrence of the church which ex- cluded him. Y. M. 1S62. Art. 14. How is it considered, when a church has sev- eral ministers of equal standing, and none of them ordained ; has the ho isekecpcr, or have the ministers a right to call to their assistance an ordained brother, without the counsel of the church ? Answer. — Th6y have not the right to do so without the counsel of the church. Art. 5.5. Which is the most advisable in holding council meetings, to ask each individual member for his consent, or to take silence for consent '( Answer. — In all weighty matters it is best for each member to answer. CHURCHES, TOO LARGE, to be subdivided. Y. M. 1810, or rather of a special meeting, we find the following record : " August 11, 1810. We, the undersigned brethren, upon request ( f some members and upon our own approbation have made a general visit and investigation of almost all the members in the Conocochcague church, whether there could not an arrangement be made, that the visit in said church and other necessary things could be carried out better, in- asmuch as the district of the church is rather extensive, and for the bet- ter satisfaction of the church than has been for some time done ? To this end we have presented our views and judgment to all the members that had assembled in manner and form, as follows : have asked them whether they felt satisfied, if the church were divided in so far that bro Nicholas jMartin should have the oversight on that side of the Conoco- chcague, where he lives? The visit and all necessary things, such as bap- 52 CLASS MEETINGS, &c. tizing and breaking of bread, &c., in said cimrch on said side of the water should 1 ly upon him, and he should also have the oversight over the members in M'Connell's Oove and those who live near where the be- loved brother Ohlinger lives. Brother Ohlin;jer should undertake noth- ing of importance without seeking counsel with brother Nicholas Martin. Just so should brother David Long have the oversight on the other side of Conococheague, where he lives, as far as the district of said church extends, to attend to the visit and everything that is necessary, as bap- tizing and breaking of bread with the counsel of the church. But when important matters should occur to require the judgment of the church (in criminal cases) or otherwise, on either side, and the brother who was set as housekeeper thought, as also the members thought, that it would be better to call the other brother to be along with them in the counsel, they should have entire liberty to do so ; and we think it would be proper, and also according to amity and love, that both brethren should stand on an equality in their office, and be considered as stewards in said church. Yet they should not divide the meetings (by this we ap- prehend is meant, that they should not have separate meetings on -one and the samo day), but should continue to hold the meetings together (as heretofore). Is the meeting on brother Nicholas' side, he should sec to it, in case brother David had a call elsewhere, or for some other cause could not come, that the meeting is attended to as usual ; and if the meeting is on brother David's side, he should be careful, in cnse brother Nicholas had another call or could not come, that the meeting is propt'rly held and continued (by a new appointment). But when both bretiiren come to meeting, then the brother in whose district it is shall commence and also close the meeting, unless upon his request and urging the other brother relieve him of this duty, to the end that all things may be done decently and in order, to which the whole church have given their sanc- tion (at least), as many as were present. In testimony whereof, the following brethren signed (the paper). Hknry Danner, Herm.vn Blaser, Martin Career, &c. Th's, though not strictly an act of general counsel, cont tins such excellent advii'e tor miiii-ters even m our own day, iluit we cuu d not refrain fioin insert- ing it here. Study it. my dear mini stenn>!; brethren, and not ouly that, but |irac- tice it, and jon will find that much of the jealousy, teuiptatioii, and often very severe trials tniwht be obviated, if we were heeding such siiii|ile rules as lu re laid down, and especial y the go-pel principle, to esteem others more highly than our (so very dear, and still so very bad) selves I ! CL.VSS MEETINGS, &c. y. M. 1838. Art. 10. Whether it be right for members to take part in Sunday schools, class meetings, and the like (under the control of COLLECTING ALMS— COMMUNING. £3 other denominations) ? Considered, most advisable to take no part in such like things. COLLECTING ALMS. (See "Alms.") COLONIZATION SOCIETY. Y. M. 1851. Art. 14. Whether it would be contrary to our profession and the doctrine of Christ, to make contributions to, or become members of the American Colonization Society, with the view of the furtherance of the liberty of the African race ? Considered, that a person may con- tribute to the Society, but not become a member. This distinction was undoubtedly made from the consideration that the colot'ization of free persons of color fron this countr}- was rather calculated to enhance the value of poor slaves, and make their liberation more hopeless. COLORED PERSONS. Y. M. 1835. Art. 1. Eow it is considered, to receive colored persons into the church ? (The object of the question was not, whether they should be received at all, but whether they could or must be received or treated altogether like white members.) It was considered, that inas- much the gospel is to be preached to all nations and races, and if they come as repentant sinners, believing in the gospel of Jesus Christ, and apply for baptism, we could not consistently refuse them. But inas- much we receive our fellow members with the holy kiss, and there is a repugnance in some of our white members to salute colored persons in this manner, the colored members should bear with that weakness, and not ofl'er the kiss to such weak members until they become stronger, and make the first offer, &c. Otherwise, if tbey (the colored members) prove faithful, they should be considered on an equality of full membership. Y. M. 1845. Art. 2. In regard to receiving colored members into the church, it was considered, to leave it to the counsel of every individ- ual church, as it is done in all cases; but if colored per.sons are once re- ceived as members into the church, the members should be at liberty to salute them in like manner as (we do) white members; at the same time having patience with those who may be weak in the faith, and cannot do so. The assembled elders, however, consider it as the more perfect way, to which we all shoulil strive to come, namely, that love which makes no distinction in the brotherhood in this respect. See James 2 : 1-10. Y. M. 1849. Art. 31. How are we to conduct with co'ored members at communion ? Considered, that this ought to be left to the individual churches, in which such members are, only that they ought not to be de- barred from the Lord's table on account of their color. COMMUNING WITH OTHER DENOMINATIONS. Y. M. 1821. Art. 3. How far brethren have liberty to commune with men who do not strictly adhere to the truth, was considered in council 54 COMMUNION. thus : that it is very dangerous to commune with such people as do not hold entirely the doctrine of Christ, since the apostle says, "If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not in your house, neither bid him God speed," (2 John 10) ; and the counsel is, to give them no liberty to speak in our meetings. C03IMUNI0N. Y. M. 1819. Art. 3. Whether we could break the bread (of commun- ion) without having a supper ? We hold, that we ought by all means in all the exercises (ordinances) look to the testimony of Jesus and his ex- ample ; for the Lord Jesus, shortly before his sufferings when he insti- tuted the Lord's supper, &c., after he had washed his disciples' feet, he did eat the supper with them, where he also dipped the sop, and gave it to Judas ; see John 13 : 26. And Mark 14 : 18, "And as they sat, and did eat, Jesus said, Verily I say unto you. One of you which eateth with me shall betray me." And v. 22, "And as they did eat, Jesus took bread, and blessed, and brake it, and gave to them, and said, Take, eat : this is my body, &c." y. M. 1830. Art. 1. Whether a minister may break the bread of communion and communicate the cup of thanksgiving to a sick person, who is not a member ? Considered, as contrary to our faith and con- science, and as more advisable to point or direct the sick to Christ and in- ward communion. — Another question presented and answered, that sick persons, who wish to be baptized, but feel too weak, might be received under the promise, that if restored to health they would submit to the command and ordinance of Christ, and in case of their death they may find comfort in the reflection, that God sees their good intentions, and may accept them for the deed. Y. M. 1831. Art. 2. Similar to the foregoing. Y. M. 1834. Art. 12. How it is considered, when a brother, not yet ordained, should administer the communion in presence of ordained breth- ren ? (If the ordained brethren desire him to do so, there can be no ob- jection; on the contrary, it is desirable for young hands in any work to have more experienced friends near to advise or assist.) Y. M. 1841. Art. 8. Whether a minister has a right to break the bread of communion to a sick person that is not a member of the church ? Considered, that a minister has not any authority in the gospel to do so j but that he should direct such a soul to the mercy of God in Christ Jesus, and to the terms and promises of the gospel. Y. M. 1844. Art. 9. What to do in case a member on a sick or death- bed requests to have the bread of communion broken unto him 1 Con- sidered, that the word of God does not seem to us to justify the breaking of the bread of communion to an individual member, for where there is but one there can be no communion ; and that therefore we would be CONFORMITY TO THE WORLD. 55 more safe to direct such a member to the grace and mercy of God in Christ Jesus, and the advice of the apostle, James 5 : 14, where he says, "Is any sick among you, let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord, &c." (This is the ordinance, it seems, specially instituted for the sick.) If they still insist upon partaking of the bread and wine in remembrance of their dying Saviour, they might be gratified, as it has been done here- tofore, when there should be a love feast in the neighborhood, by send- ing to them of the blessed bread and wine, or by holding a small love feast at their houses, in the right time and in the proper order. Y. M. 1851. Art. 12. Whether it isaccordins; to the gospel for breth- ren to administer the communion to a sick or disabled member in the day- time, and without celebrating the other ordinances connected with it ? Considered, not to be according to the gospel. I''. M. 1861. Art. 8. Is it according to the gospel for brethren to ad- minister the communion to the sick or disabled members in the day-time, and without celebrating the other ordinances connected with it'! Con- sidered, not according to the gospel, because the Master instituted it in the night. However, there is no impropriety in attending to it, if done in the regular way, and at the proper time, in connection with the other ordinances instituted with it. Y. M. 1862. Art. 68. How shall we proceed in case a sick member requests the communion ? Will any time do ? And must feet-washing and the supper accompany the communion ? Answer. — We consider it best to administer it in the evening, according to the example of Christ. John 13. COMPLAINT AGAINST A MEMBER. Y. M. 1843. Art. 10. Whether a complaint agiiust a member may be taken up in the church, that is of several years standing ? Considered, that this depends in a great measure upon circumstances. In complaints of a private nature between brother and brother, the course which our Saviour prescribes, Matt. 18, ought to be pursued, and when we have taken the two first steps toward a reconciliation, without being satisfied, then "tell it unto the church" is the Saviour's command; and when the yearly visit has gone round, and the bread of communion has been broken, and we neglected to obey this command, the church is not bound after- ward to take up our complaint. But in case a fault had been committed by a member, and was not known to the complaining member until after a length of time, it is still his duty to tell it unto the church, and the complaint is to be taken up by the church. CONFESSION. (See "Acknowledgment.") CONFORMITY TO THE WORLD. Y. M. 1804. Art. 8. Further, it has been discussed about the evil, ofiFensive to God and the holy angels in heaven, and also to the faithful 56 CONFORMITY TO THE WOELD. souls on earth, namely, about the new fashions which are in vogue with the world, and there are here and there even believers who obey the lust of their eyes, and herein conform themselves to the world, especially the young, having gone so far astray that the Lord has cause to com- plain that almost all flesh have corrupted their way. Therefore, it has been deemed good, that the bishops and ministers, as well as all fathers and mothers of families, should use all diligence to resist such things, that they may not spread further, but rather might be done away; espe- cially when there are persons desiring to be received into the church, it should be laid before them, that such is contrary to the doctrine of sal- vation, and that it is their duty to deny themselves, and when they arc willing to lay such things aside, then we may baptize them cheerfully, hoping that they will continue to receive further instruction, &c. Y. M. 1817. Art. 2. Concerning conforming to the world in wearing fashionable clothing and everything that is high, without exception, it was considered, that when a member should herein be found guilty, he should be admonished, and if the admonition would not bo heeded, we could not hold such in full fellowship, inasmuch the Saviour says, " That which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16 : 15. Y. M. 1822, Canton. Art. 6. How it is considered, when members will not heed the counsel of love of the brethren, with regard to con- forming to the world in clothing, &c. ? It was considered, for the third time in the great council, that when a member has been admonished in love once and again, we would not break bread with such. But at this meeting it has been considered, that when they will not receive counsel in love, we could not hold such member in full fellowship according to the gospel. Also such who permit those high fashions in their children who are yet under their control, and especially the bishops and ministers in the church should be examples of the flock. Y. M. 1834. Art. 11. Concerning high and fashionable clothing, &c., and conformity to the world, it was considered a great evil as heretofore, which is not to be tolerated in the church. Y. M. 1840. Art. 7. Concerning the lamentably prevailing evil, that members conform themselves so much to the world in building, house furniture, apparel, &c., and even in sleighing have bells upon their hor- ses ? It was considered, that all brethren and members, and especially ministers, should withstand and labor against this growing evil, and that anything unbecoming for brethren should be avoided. Y. M- 1845. Art. 6. In regard to members conforming too much with the world in fishionable dressing, building and ornamenting houses in the style of those high in the world, it was considered, that it is a dan- gerous and alarming evil, and ought not to b"^ 4inong the humble follow- ers of the lowly Jesus. CONFORMITY TO THE WORLD. 57 Y. M. 184G. Art. 10. About pride in its various forms, which is creeping into the church, it is thought highly necessary that the yearly meeting instruct and urge it upon all the overseers of the church to see especially to that matter, and pretest strongly against all manner of su- perfluities and vanity, such as building fine houses, having paintings, car- peting and costly furniture, &c., together with the adorning of the body too much after the fashion of the world. We believe that we should deny ourselves, and abstain from these things, especially the laborers in the wcrd, who are called to be examples of the flock. Y. M. 18-19. Art. 25. Whether it would not be agreeable to the gos- pel, to advise those members who have been in the church two or three years, and are still conformed to this world, not to come to communion, until they deny themselves and become transformed from the world, after being admonished thereto ? Considered, that conformity to the world presents itself in such various ways, that we cannot erect a standard in regard to it, so as to authorize the church to prohibit such members from partaking of the communion, but such members should be admon- ished and reproved by the church again and again. Y. M. 18G1. Art 3. Inasmuch as the brethren have decided in con- ference that members who would not conform to the order in dress as generally practiced by the old brethren and sisters, that they could not have the privilege to the communion. But as this docs not restrain them into the order, we wish to know whether the church has the right to deal with them as ofienders, when they will not conform in dress or to wear- ing caps, and leave off wearing hoops '/ Considered, that such members should be admonished, and that warmly too, to lay aside all superfluities, and conform to the order of the church. Otherwise they must and will be regarded as disobedient members. See Rom. 12. Y. M. 18()2. Art. 22. How is it considered for sisters to wear hoops, and to conform themselves to the new fashions of the world ? Shall we tolerate it or not ? . Answer. — The answer to the third query of last yearly meeting is re-adopted. Y. M. 1803. Art. 3. How are we to deal with sisters who are wear- ing hoops ? They should be admonished once and again, and if they will not heed the admonitions, they should be dealt with according to Matt. 18. (See Min. 1861, Art. 3.) Y. M. 18G4. Art. 7. When the apostles prohibited the wearing of gold and pearls (1 Tim. 2 : 9, 1 Pet. 3 : 3), are gold watches to be inclu- ded ? Answer. — As the carrying of gold watches may and is likely to lead to pride, we think it advisable not to wear them. Art. 8. How is it considered by the brethren in yearly council assem- bled, in relation to the members who do not conform to the order of the brethren in the wearing of apparel, and in the wearing of their hair, but follow the fashions of the world '{ Answer. — We think that the minis- tering brethren should heartily admonish and urge the members to con- 58 CONGREGATIONAL. form to the order of the brethren, and set them a good example, and if those who are admonished again and again, and that by the church too as well as by the ministers, will not hear, the word of God directs us what to do with them. Matt. ch. 18. Art. 10. Is it considered right, according to the gospel, for a minister to wear a soldier's overcoat when in the pulpit, or at other times ; and if it is not, how is such a brother to be dealt with, if he should continue to wear it after being admonished ? Answer. — It is considered not advisa- ble for any brother, whether a minister or private member, to wear mili- tary clothing, and if he is admonished, and still persists in being disobe- dient, he should be dealt with according to the 18th chap, of Matthew. CONGREGATIONAL. Congregationalism is defined by Webster "as that system of cburcb govern- ment which vests all ecclesiastical power in the assemtsled brotherhood of each local church as an independent body." Charles Buck describes Congrcgational- isfs, "as a denomination of Frotestants, so called from their maintaining that each particular church or congregation is authorized by Christ to exercise all the acts of ecclesiastical power and privilege within itself, without being subject to the jurisdiction or control of any bishop, synod, presbytery or council compos'^d of delegates from different associated churches." Now it happened that nearly one hundred years ago a certain writer, Morgan Edwards by name, and an Eng- lish Baptist minister, in his "Materials toward a History of American Baptists," made mer,tion of our Brethren, and among other things, that our churches were " Congregational," and this was republished agaia and again in other works, without being contradicted. There are three systems of church government in vogue among the Protestant de- nominations in this country: the Episcopal, the Presbyterian and the Congregational. Ntilher of these answers or corresponds with our system, which we will call the primitive system. True, we have bishops, though the title is not assumed by thop.e who are intrusted with that office, but they are calling themselves simply elders, and they are nothing like the great prelates of the Protestant Episcopal Church, who exercise authority over all the churches of a whole State or other large district. Neither r.re our bishops like those of the Methodist Episcopal Church, who have power, every year or two, to transfer all their subordinate ministers from one place to another, according to their own personal judgment, so that af- ter every conference a general moving takes place among their clergy, with few exceptions. Our bishops are simply overseers over that one church where they reside, and over the one or two churches that may be destitute of an overseer in their immediate neighborhood; but it was always considered, that they should exercise their duty only by and with the consent of the respective; church. And though he has the privilege and duty to exercise his office any where he ma}' come, in a properly established church, he can do so only by request or invitation of tL".at church. So it is evident that we are not Episcopalians in the common ac- ceptation, but only in the scriptural sense of the word. The same is the case with regard to Presbyterianism. Whatever authority may be claimed by modern presbyteries (elderships) separate and apart from the church (membership), uo number of presbyters or elders in our church can ex- ercise any authority, lay down any rules for the church, without the consent of the church. So then we are not Presbyterians. If any one will say now. Then of course you must be Independents or Congre- gationalists ; are you not? To this we answer emphatically. No. So far from feeling ourselves being independent, we know we are dependent, as in our nat- ural condition, upon God for our life and every thing we have and are, and unto our fellow mortals, who prepare for us those things we cannot prepare for our- selves ; so we are dependent upon God for every spiritual blessing, and upon our fellow Christians to assist us in obtaining those blessings. And thaf our churches were not founded on the Congregational principle, as defined above, is evident from the following historical COUNCIL OF THE CHURCH. 59 FACTS. 1. The first and oldest of our churches in America is in Germantown, near Philadelphia, Pa. It was established in 1722, Peter Becker being the first min- ister. If they had wished to act upon the "Congregational" principle, they mijrht have done so, without asking any person outside of thpir immediate neigh- borhood, and as yet there was no other church of our failh on this side of the Atlan- tic. But before they took any step in organizing themselves into a church, and establishing weekly meetings for public worship, or before they ever held a ])ub- lic meeting for worship in this country, we are informed, they visited all their dispersed brethren and fellow believers as far as Skippach, Falconer Swamp, Oley, &c., undoubtedly to seek their advice and consent to the important step they were to take, and only after they had got this, they commenced to hold weekly meetings, we are told, alternately, "at brother Peter Becker's and Gomorry's." And this principle, that a local church should not undertake any- thing of importance without counsel and consent of the brethren generally, out- side of that locality, has ever been upheld to this day, with very few exceptions, and these exceptions have most always proved calamitous to such churches as ventured upon such an exceptional course. 2. The second fact to prove that local churches among us do not pretend to act independently of other churches is this, that to every love feast that is held in any church (excepting where a sick member requests a little love feast to be held in his house), members and ministers are invited from other churches to this day. 3. No choice is held in anj' church, even only for a single deacon, without two or more elders being present from other churches to conduct the choice. 4. No case of censure against an elder, minister or deacon, is taken up in counsel before a local church, without th" presence of elders and as many minis- tering and private members from other churches. 5. No case, of which avoidance may be probably the result, is undertaken in a local church without some elders from other churches. Now these facts prove very evidently that a local church among us does not lay claim to possessing all power, unless in contradiction to the fundamental principles and practice of our brotherhood. Y. M. 1863. Art. 20. Can an arm of the church (or a local church) be congregational, or act independent from all the churches of our fra- ternity, and still be in full union with the church ? Answer. — It can- not, according to the gospel and the order of the brethren. See Rom. 12 : 4, 5 ; 1 Cor. 1 : 10 ; Ephes. 5 : 2, 4, &c. COUNCIL OF THE CHURCH. Y. M. 1846, Tennessee. Art. 4. How it is considered for a bishop, with a few members, to expel a member without taking the council of the church ? Considered, that in all such important matters the church must be counseled. Y. 31. 1848, Ohio. Art. 26. AYhether it is proper in all cases to ask counsel (of the church) before giving a letter of recommendation ? Con- sidered, to be best always first to take the counsel of the church. Same year, Indiana. Art. 7. How it is viewed, when persons living in one district request to be baptized and received into church fellowship in another district, whether it is proper to receive them without counsel of the district in which they live ? Considered, that we deem it advisa- ble, and it has been generally the course of the brethren, in a case where a person made application for baptism in a meeting out of the district in 60 COVERINa OF THE HEAD-DEACONS. whicli the applicant lives, to bold council with the members of that church in whoBe bounds he resides. Y. M. 1856. Art. 9. How is it considered, where there is a church with a bishop and two speakers, authorized to baptize, &c., and the other not, and a case of difficulty occurs between two members, and is brought before the church, those three ministers being present; but the two first being relatives to the parties, they authorize the third to attend to the case, aud present it before the church. The question is, would it be con- sidered legal ? Considered, legal. Y. M. 1862. Art. li. How is it considered, when a church has sev- eral ministers of equal standing, and none of them ordained, has the housekeeper, or have the ministers, a right to call to their assistance an ordaiued brother (to a church council) without the counsel of the church? They have not the right to do so without the counsel of the church. (Should this not be reconsidered ?) Art. 55. Which is the most advisable in holding council meetings, to ask each individual member for his consent, or to take silence for con- sent ? In all weighty matters it is best for each member to answer. COYERIXa OF THE HEAD. Y. M. 1848, Ohio. Art. 6. Whether the Scriptures require thatwomen praying or prophesying, should have any other covering than their hair, and whether it includes alike married or unmarried women ? Consider- ed, unanimously, that they all should have a covering on their heads (besides their own hair). Eead 1 Cor. 11 : 2-15. la cases like the present, which concern the female portion of the church, would it be out of the way or contrary to the gospel to appoint a committee of elderly sisters (perhaps with an aged brother elder), to consider such questions and rejiori theieon? It would seem to be consistent with the principles of equal- ity, see Gal. 3 : 28, and their verdict would perhaps have more weight with their younger sisters. Y. M. 1856. Art. 26. Would it be proper to reconsider the 6th que- ry of 1848? Seeing it is admitted that sisters should wear a covering, what should that covering be according to the gospel ? We are satisfied, with our ancient brethren, that the plain cap worn by our dear aged sis- ters is a covering, as required by the Scriptures according to Paul. Y''. M. 1862. Art. 19. Inasmuch it is the order of the brethren, that sisters should wear caps, what should be done with a sister in case of stubbornness ? And should there be any allowance made for the un- married ? We consider it is the duty of all the sisters to have on a plain covering at the time of worship. DEACONS, THEIR OFFICE AND DUTY. Y. M. 1835, Ohio. Art. 4. What is the duty of a visiting brother ? First, as visiting brethren and overseers of the poor in the church, they have to assist and attend to the yearly general visit from house to house; DEACONS. 61 and it is necessary and their datj, when the cliureh is divided into diifcr- ent visit-districts, to take the lead in the visit as well as that of the minis- ters; and in case the ujinisters could not assist on account of sickness, it is the duty of the deacons to carry out the visit wiih other brethren, and to bring before the ministers and the church what they have found. Fur- ther, when anything of importance is to be investigated in the church, the ministers have the right to request them (the deacons) to accompany theui, or if the case is not of special importance to send them (the dea- cons) to investigate the matter and bring it before the ministry. Fur- ther, it is their duty, inasmuch as they have been elected to be overseers of the poor, to visit the sick, especially if they are poor, who may be in distress by reason of sickness or other causes, to examine their case, and to re; ort to the ministry, and, if necessary, the ministers to hold a coun- cil with the church what is further to be done. When money or grain is contributed in the church for the poor in the church, it is their duty to keep a regular book account of what they receive, and what they lay out for the poor or otherwise for the church, so that they are able at times to render an account with and to the church. Upon the whole, all that may occur in the church and is to be investigated, is committed to their care, and if they hear of anything, to bring it before the ministers, to counsel whether it is to be examined, and to see it done if louud ne- cessary. Further, it is their calling to assist the ministers at meeting, by read- ing the Scriptures, by using freedom in prayer, and to bear testimony to what was spoken ; and if it should happen that no minister (of the word) could come to meeting, it is their duty to lead the worship by sing- ing, prayer and reading the Scriptures, and if they feci so, to exhort to the editication of the congregation ; yet it was the counsel ol the old brethren that it is not their calling to rise on their feet iu order to ex- liort; and thus to conclude the meeting in the usual order, and to make the ordinary appointments for meeting Again, when a minister is call- ed t.-) hold meetings in another district, and he requests the visiting breth- ren to give him company and assistance, it is their duty to assist, and one or the other to go with him. Further, it is their duty to serve at tables; when a love feast is held, to make the necessary preparations, to call as many other brethren as they need to ass'st, and at the time ot the love least to see to it that the sis- ters can get all things ready at the proper time, and themselves setting the tables, and so iu all things see to it that everything is done decently and in order. Y. 1841. Art 9. Whether a deacon or visiting brother may give testimony to what a deacon has said, while there is one or more ministers present that have not spoken, and request him to speak ? Considered, that he may if requested. 62 DEACONS. Y. M. 1843. Art. 1. Is it agreeable with the word of God for a dea- con or visiting brother to stand up in public meeting and exhort, when sufficient time has been spent already ? Considered, that according'to the word of God " all things shall be done decently and in order," and as teaching is the proper office of the teachers, and not of deacons, they ought not to go any further than their calling requires of them where it is not necessary, and it would not be advisable for a teacher to urge them — the deacons — any further than duty calls them. Y. M. 1838. Art. 9. Whether we have the right to appoint deacons, without laying hands on them according to the example of the apostles? Acts 6 : 6. Considered and resolved, to postpone the further considera- tion of this query to the next annual meeting. Y. M. 1810. Art. 8. The question about laying on of hands on dea- cons, decided to leave the matter as heretofore. Y. M. 1841. Art. 1. About the laying on of hands on deacons. This query has been before the annual meeting of 1838 and 1839, and the brethren generally considered, that since there is no direct command to do so in the New Testament, and on the contrary the apostle gives advice, 1 Tim. 5 : 12, " Lay hands suddenly on no man," it would be best to proceed in this matter as the brethren of old have done. This is, how- ever, laid down with this proviso, that if any brother could throw more light on the subject, it might be presented again at the next annual meeting. Y. M. 1845. Art. 11. The question about the laying on of hands on deacons having been brought again before the yearly meeting, and being of such consequence and importance, it was considered, that since our churches are not generally represented (at this time), not one brother from Pennsylvania or Maryland, and also not many of our elder breth- ren, whose counsel had been given last year on this article, being present at this time, it would be best to refer this question to the next annual meeting, recommending the same to the (prayerful) consideration of all the churches. Y. M. 1846. Art. 3. About the laying on of hands on deacons. On this much and long agitated question it was finally laid down as thesalest way to continue as heretofore. The objection, that it was an apostolical order, which ought to be observed, was answered, that (even) supposing the apostles had laid their hands on the heads of the deacons, which in our apprehension cannot be made evident, as little as a single walk of a few men through a wilderness will make a road or beaten track, just as little a thing once done makes it an order ; and that if the example of the chosen seven (Acts 7) having had hands laid on them, would have to be observed, as some of our beloved brethren understand it, then wc would also have to imitate the example of the same church, " who had all things common, and sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need." Acts 2 : 44, 45. But since we do not DEACONS. 63 find in any other cliurch established by the apostles any thing similar, and since there is also no testimony that the apostles ever after practiced the laying on of hands on the heads of deacons, our beloved brethren will not think hard of us, if under these and other considerations we abide by that practice with which so many faithful brethren in our churches have been introduced to the office of deacons and (ministers) speakers of the word. Y. M. 184G. (Tennessee.) Art. 6. Whether a deacon can be ordained to the office of bishop '/ Considered, that we have no authority for so doing. See 1 Tim. 3 : 10 and 5 : 22.— Art. 7. Whether a deacon should fill up appointments in the absence of the minister ? Considered, that he may by singing, praying, exhorting, and reading the Scriptures ; but that he is not to preach until he is legally authorized by the church. Art. 11. Whether a deacon has a right to appoint meetings and preach without being authorized by the church ? Considered, that he has no authority for so doing, but that he should try to discharge the duties in- cumbent upon him in the office for which he has been set apart. Y. M. 1847. Art. 4. A request that the present yearly meeting re- consider the third query as it stands on the minutes of Y. M. 184G, con- cerning the laying on of hands on the deacons. It was almost unani- mously concluded, that it would be better for the present to leave this subject rest as it is. — Art. 5. Would it be considered expedient for a church to elect a brother for the office of deacon, whose wife is not a member ? Considered, that if he be a brother of good report, and one in whom the church may have confidence, this circumstance ought not to hinder the church from electing him to the office of deacon, provided there be no other objections. 1 Tim. 3: 12. Y. M. 1848. Art. IG. About the laying on of hands on deacons it was unanimously considered, to postpone the discussion of this subject indefinitely, until there is reason to hope that it may be done calmly and without prejudice. Y. M. 1850. Art. 27. About the laying on of hands on deacons, when installed into office. Considered, that the brethren, after a long contin- ued and attentive investigation of the word of God on this agitating sub- ject in question, have come to the following CONCLUSION. Whereas, it is plain from the Acts and the proceedings of the apostles, that there must have been deacons in those days, and that these deacons must have been active in their office, before the seven teachers or evan- gelists were chosen and installed into their office ; see Acts 2 : 45, and 4 : 35, " Distribution was made unto every man, according as he had need," from which we conclude, if distributions were made to every man, there must of course have been those that made them. Hence it is the opinion of the brethren in this council assembled, that the seven chosen and set before the apostles (Acts 6:6), were selected from among, 64 DEACONS. as WG might say the first class of teachers, (see Acts 6 : 3, 8; eh. 8: 6, 7, 36-38; ch. 21 : 8), and hands laid on thsni bj' the apostles to establish them, to settle the difiiculty that had arisen among the deacons about the daily ministration, and that the seven were not deacons in the restricted sense of the word, and were never called such, tho word '-deacon"* not once occurring in the whole book of the Acts. Therefore, the laying on of hands ought to be practiced on such old teachers that are set apart (for the office of overseers or bishops); and deacons ought to be received into their office by hand and kiss, as the practice has been hitherto with the brethren. The following wns added to the minutes of the same year in an appen- dix on the same subject : Wkereax, The brethren of the various churches have taken into seri- ous consideration the subject of the laying on of hands on deacons, and coula therefore come to no satisfactory decision, we have now come to the following CONCLUSION. First, that the seven brethren elected. Acts 6, were not elected from the common (private) members, but from the teachers and evangelists; see Acts 21 : 8. Second, the business for which they were elected must have been to settle the disputes that had arisen among the then existing deacons, as such must have been already among them, since we read that •' there were distributions made, as every one had need," see Acts 4 : 35. There- fore, as we have no evidence that hands were laid on diracons elected from among the common brethren, it is thought proper and good to pro- ceed as the brethren have heretofore done in the election of deacons. That there were such (deacons) in the churches in the time of the apos- tles, see Phil. 1 : I ; 1 Tim. 3 : 8, 10, 12, 13; and we now have need of them in the church too, that is, if deacons are necessary in a church. That the church come together with the elders and bishops, and with prayer and fasting let the church proceed to choose such an one as may be pointed out to them by the Spirit of God, and receive him by the holy kiss and the right hand of fellowship. Wc hereby also exhort our brethren everywhere, no more after this to cite as authority lor deacons the seven elected from among the evangelists, Acts 6, but only the office *Tlie word deat-on (Greek, ("iiaKovoc,) occurs about thirty times in tlie New Testament, and is rendered in the common Knglisli vcysion twenty tim s iii,iits(er, seven times seruani, ami only three times deacon. tSee Matt. 20 : 2G, 22 : 13. 23 : 11; Marie 9: 35, 10: 43; .Jolin 2: 5,9, 12: 2rt; Rom. 13: 4 twice. 15: 8, 16: 1, 1 C.r 3: 5; 2 Cor. 3: 6, G: 4. 1 1 : 15 twice, and 23; Gal. 2:17; Kph. 3: V, 6 : 21; Phil 1 : 1; Col. 1 : 7. 23, 25. 4 : 7; 1 Thefs. 3: 2 ; 1 Tim. 3 : 8, 12. 4: U. The English version contains the word deicoii twice more, namely-, 1 Tim. 10, 13; but the original Greek h is not the same W' rd, and the German tranylaiion is more 'orreci in ihffe two inst^mces saying literally, v^rse 10, "Then let them ferue, being f aind fiiithfiil ; ' and iu verse 13, '' For they that serve well, purchase to themselves a good degree, &c." DEACONS. 65 itself. From this mistake has originated the vexatious question which has agitated our brethren (in some parts) so lon-g and so grievously. This, or something similar, we desire our brethren in council to place on our minutes, so that the subject may once be settled. In citing Acts 6 : 1-8, when a choice was to be held in a church for any officers, our ancient brethren were not mistaken, inastnnch as ihey referred simply to it as the flrst and in fact the only example of the a|)OStles on record, how they ])ro- ceeded in conducting the choice; at the same time, th'.-y held the principle that the church had authority from the Lord to define the duties of every officer, and to hold them responsible in Iheir respective office for neglecting or transgressing their duties. It was only from a misapprehension of some brethren, both as to the proper application of Scripture declarations and examples, and to the proper limits of every office as understood by the old brethren, that the vexatious ques- tion above alluded to originated. If brethren in every office are truly humble, they will be satisfied with that degree of authority intrusted to them, and the manner and form by which the church has inducted them into office, and indeed it is desirable such questions would remain settled for good, and 2 Tim. 2: 23 and Titus 3 : 9 were more heeded, when queries are formed, and repeatedly pre- sented to yearly meetings. Y. M. 1858. Art. 16. Is it right for a brother that is a deacon to give out a hymn and sing it, ten or fifteen minutes before the time ap- pointed for commencing the meeting, when the house or room is full of people, or is it more advisable to remain silent till the time for com- mencing meeting arrives ? Ans. Considered, that we see no impropriety in singing, when in the estimation of the church it is done to its own edification, and to the honor of God. Y. M. 1862. Art. 6. Is it proper for the visiting brethren at our public meetings, when there are from three to six laboring brethren present, to rise to their feet, and line out a hymn and exhort in prefer- ence to the laboring brethren, or are they to keep their seats ? Ans. The laboring brethren are to conduct the meeting, and it is the duty of the visiting brethren to exhort, when liberty is given them. Same year. Art. 39. How is it considered, when visiting brethren will, in meeting, get up on their feet and speak, when there are elected speakers present, and sometimes speak thirty minutes or upward, and that without liberty from the speakers ? If that is not in order for visiting brethren, what is the order '{ Is it to stand upon their feet when they have anything to say, or to keep their seats? Ans. We consider it out of order for visiting brethren to do so, without liberty being given by min- istering brethren, if such are present. Though there has been a good deal said above, at different times and on dif- ferent occasions, on the office of " deacon," with which we feel agreed fully and cordially, a few thoughts, occurring to us whiie we transcribed the foregoing pages, may not be amiss, and we will try lo put them in the form of a direct ADDaEcS TO THE DEACONS, OR VISITING BRETHREN, OF THE PRESENT TIME. Beloved Brethren — Allow us to say a few words concerning the importance of your office, and first of all, to lay before you the word of God concerning it as recorded in 1 Tim. 3 : 8-13, " Likewise must the 5 66 DEACONS. deacons be grave (serious), Dot double-tongued, not given to much wine, not greedy of filthy lucre, holding the njystery of the faith in a pure conscience. And let these also first be proved ; then let them use the onace of a deacon, being found blameless. Even so must their v?ives be grave, not slanderers, sober, faithful in all things. Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well. For they that have used the office of a deacon well, purchase to themselves a good degree, and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus." From the very first word of this passage, " likewise'' you will perceive that your office, though different in its duties, is equally important in the church as the ofi&ce of a bishop. If it may be said, that the bishop or overseer is or should be the right eye of the church, and he with the other ministers the mouth of the church, you are or should be the right ear and the right hand of the church. The bight ear — to hear the faint lamentations of the poor, sick and otherwise distressed members and others — to give attention to evil reports of the moral conduct of mem- bers, which, if founded in truth, would injure the character and useful- ness of the church; and "holding the mystery of the faith" and the established principles and order of the church "in a pure conscience" — to watch the public ministrations of the brethren, that none but sound doctrine may be preached by them in union, and that all public meetings maybe conducted to edification, " decently and in order." The right HAND — to dispense the charities of the church according to its direction discreetly and impartially — to act in all cases of complaints against mem- bers, investigating, visiting and reporting to the church — to support your faithful ministers in the legitimate exercise of their duties by your prayers, by your testimony and defense in their behalf in and out of meeting, and to present their case to the church not only for consideration, but also for active sympathy, when duty crlls them too frequently from home, spending their strength, time and money in the service of the Lord, so that their families may suffer, seeing things going wrong at home, and feeling distressingly the absence of their husband and father. Such a state of things in tha families of ministers should not be overlooked by thoughtful and loving brethren, especially not by you, dear brethren deacons, whose particular province and business it is to extend your right arm to those in distress. These few thoughts might be sufficient, together with the word of God preceding them, which inculcates the qualifications required for your office, and the great reward for a faithful discharge of your duties promised therein, to convince you, dear brethren deacons, of the great importunce of your office, and the high calling to which the church has called you. Luc there is a still higher duty, which you may have to exercise. We are all poor fallible beings, subject to like passions as other men are, whether we be preachers, deacons or private members. Already DEALINa WITH MEMBERS. 6/- in the primitive cliurchcs, planted by divinely inspired apostles, it happened sometimes that even the ministers became involved in disputes and difficul- ties with each other, and that there were such " doting about questions and strifes of words whereof cometh envy, strife, railiupjs, evil surmisings, perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth, (!i:c." (1 Tim. 6 : 4, 5.) If such a sad state of things should occur in your church, that your ministers could not agree, would not speak the same thing, and cause confusion and disunion in the church, then, brethren deacons, you that stand right between the ministers and the private members, by standing up unitedly and manfully and without partiality for the right, for order and for union, may become mediators and peace-makers by calling elders of other churches to assistance, and thus restore union and good fooling ; and you know the peace-makers have been blessed with a special blessing by our Saviour. DEALING WITH MEMBERS upon complaints before the church Y. M. 1841. Art. 13. Whether a brother or member could be judged (dealt with) consistently with the gospel, without having a hearing before the church with privilege to defend him(or her)self? Ans. Considered, that no brother or sister ought to be brought before the council of the church for any accusation, without having previous information thereof and without having the privilege of being present at the examination of the witnesses, and also of defending himself or herself according to the gospel. This answer is good and right .is far as it goes ; but the question again arises : If the member has been p: operly notifird and invited lo conic before the council, and he refuses to come, or at least does not come at the time appointed, \vh:U then? Is the course of righteousness on the part of llie church to be stopped in this case? We will try to answer in the fear of the Lord, according to the gen- eral practice in our churclies. As the ca-es may be dilfercnt, and the causes of the non-appearance ot the member to be dealt with may also be different, the church where the ca^o has oi;ciii ri'il c:,ii Ih'jI jud-e wlieiher lo go on with it or not. We will suppose tliree c;i-' >, < i' i; :i- li r. i- aciu dly occurred in our pres- ence. An aged brother had cinmiiiliril i tie-p is^ against one ot the principles of the gospel to which we hold steadlajlly, tlioiigh other denominations do not, and wouiil call the act of the brother j ust and right ; in this case, considering tlie age of the b; other, and not knowing whether he had been well enougb in healthi or not to attend, the matter was postponed to another time. In another case, a crime had been committed, which brought scandal upon the church. When the guilty member was visited and invited to come before the council, and elders had been invited from a distance specially for assisting in thi^ case, and the member did not come for very shame, sending word that tiie church should deal with her .according to the word of the Lord, and the church did so alter the crime was established by two or three witnesses, and confessed hy the member before the visiting brethren. In a third case, a similar crime had been committed, but much aggravated by the circumstances. Again and again eff >rts had been made to bring th; matter before tbe chinch; but for a considerable time justice was baSled. At last the cluirch felt com|)elled to bring it to an issue. Direct and cir- cumstantial evidence had aceunuiiiited, brethren from a considerable distance were invited, and brethi ea had specially been sent to the guilty member, bur, he would not and did not come. However, the case went on, and the ends of justice were attained to the almost unanimous, though sorrowful, satisfaction of tbe church ; thus deciding that when a member refuses the privilege of being present at the examination of witnesses, and also of defending himself, the church cannot be jirevented of doing her duty. 68 DEBTS. DEBTS, ABOUT BRETHREN GETTING INVOLVED IN. Y, M. 1804. Art. 3. About such brethren, who so easily and heed- lessly involve themselves in debts, and do not seek counsel, until they do not know any more how to counsel or help themselves j then they want at last counsel, when they desire and need help. It has been unanimously deemed good, that every church where such brethren live should endeavor diligently to instruct such brethren also in temporal or bodily things, that they should act considerately, and make no more debts than they can pay ; and when at times their circumstances should be such that they could not see through, they should seek counsel of prudent brethren, and even the whole church is in duty bound to give counsel when requested; and if the counsel of the church should not be sufficient, it is also her duty to assist as far as possible in a case of necessity. At the same time such should be informed that if they would not receive good counsel, they should not expect or hope that the church would feel bound or willing to assist much. Y. M. 1825. Art. 5. Whether a brother minister, that involves him- self in debts, and assigns his property to his children, could serve in the ministry of the word, was considered, that when the creditors should be defrauded thereby, he should give himself over to the (judgment of the) church, and without doubt ought not to serve (in the office of a minister). Y. M. 1832. Art. 6. How to do when a brother is indebted to another, and becomes insolvent ? Ans. The church should deal with him accord- ing to the circumstances or degrees of aggravation, according to the word. Y. JI. 1841. Art. 5. Whether a brother consistently with the gospel can take the benefit of the law for insolvent debtors ? Ans. Considered, that there may be cases where the involving at first, and the consequences thereupon, are not at all compatible with the gospel, and where the church could not hold such as brethren ; and that there may be cases where a brother by misfortune may be brought to such extremity, and, if he were honest in his declaration, his application for the benefit of the law might even be excusable. In all such cases, however, the church has to inves- tigate the matter, and judge according to the circumstances and nature of the case, and if the church is at a loss (in the case), to call in, as in other cases, the assistance of elders from other churches. Y. M. 1862. Art. 30. What shall we do with brethren, of whom the world complains to the church for neglecting to pay their debts, and for causing disappointment to their creditors ? Ans. If the brethren can and will not pay their debts, they should be dealt with according to the gospel as offending members. Same year. Art. 64. How is it considered, if members owe a just debt and suffer themselves to be sued ? Has the church a right to bring such members before the church (council), and investigate the case, to see whether such members have done their duty ? Ans. We consider it has. DEFENDING OUR ORDER. 69 DEFENDING OUR ORDER. Y. M. 1862. Art. 18. The brethren assembled in council in (the dis- trict of) the Valley of Virginia, being impressed with the importance of having the public more fully enlightened upon (the subject of) the ordi- nances, have agreed to adopt the plan at our communion meetings, when it is expedient in the afternoon service, to occupy the time in discussing these subjects before the commencement of the evening exercises. Will the annual meeting approve of this plan^ insert it on the minutes, and recommend it ? Ans. While we strongly recommend the defense of the ordinances, we leave it to the direction of the churches to decide the time and place of their defense. It seems it would be always best not to infringe on the liberty of the minis- tering brethren to select their subjects, with which they may feel impressed at any time or place. " Where the spirit of the Lord is there is liberty." Any prescribed plan will curtail that liberty, and may prevent the utterance of such truths that might be timely, useful, and of the utmost importance. DEVIL, HIS PERSONALITY, AND ANGELS. Y. M. 1856. Art. 14. (1) The question concerning the reality of a devil was considered, and after comparing opinions and sentiments on the subject of the reality of such a being and his nature, we agreed upon the following view : that the Scriptures recognize a devil or an evil spirit that manifests itself in the flesh. To assist the careful reader in forming a proper judgment in this mat- ter, the word of the Lord is added here. The name "devil" (Greek, Am/SoAof,) occurs no less than thirty-eight times in the New Testament, to wit : Matt. 4 : 1, 5, 8, 11. Here are the facts of Christ's temptation related. If there was no personal tempter there outside of Christ, and still the temptation is admitted, then the temptation must have manifested itself in the flesh of Christ, which would be blasphemy of our most holy and sinless Saviour, and destructive to our hope of salvation through him. Matt. 13 : a9. The enemy that sowed them is the devil. 25 : 41. Depart . . . into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil, and his angels. Luke 4 : 2, 3, 5, 6, 13. Compare with Matt. 4 : 1,11. 8 : 12. Then cometh the devil, and taketh away the word out of their hearts. John G : 70. Have not I chosen you twelve, and one of you is a devil. 8 : 44. Ye are of your father the devil. 13 : 2. The devil having now put into the heart of Judas, &c. Acts 10 : 38. Healing all that were oppressed of the devil. 13 : 10. 0 full of all subtlety and all mischief, thou child of the devil. Ephes, 4 : 27. Neither give place to the devil. 6 : 11. That ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. 70 DEVIL. 1 Tim. 3 : 6. Lest ... he fall into the conJnmnation of the devil. 7. Lest he fell into reproach and the snare of the devil. 11. Not slanderers (Greek, AiapoXovg, devils). 2 Tim. 2 : 2G. Out of the snare of the devil. 3 : 3. False accusers (Greek, devils). Tit. 2 : 3. Not false accusers (Greek, as above). Heb. 2 : 14. Destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil. James 4: 7. Eesist the devil, and he will flee from you. 1 Pet. 5 : 8. Your adversary, the devil, as a roaring lion. 1 John 3 : 8. Here the word occurs three times. 3 : 10. In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil. Jude, verse 9. Contending with the devil. Rev. 2 : 10. The devil shall cast some of you into prison. 12:9. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan. Rev. 12: 12. The devil is come down unto you. 20 : 2, The dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan. 20 : 10. And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire. A close examination of the above passages, and many others relating to the same being- — the name '• t^atan " occurring also some thirty times in the New Testament — will assist any sincere inquirer after truth to overcome every diffi- culty on tills suljject. The objection, that these appellations are sometimes ap- plied to men in ScTiptiire, will vanish as soon as the reader learns that the literal meaning of the term devil ( Aia/^o/lof) is an accuser, calumniator, slanderer, or aa adversary, an enemy. A gr eater difficulty is to reconcile the existence of such an evil, malignant and powerful being with the goodness and perfect character of God the Fatiier Almighty, tlie Creator of heaven and earth, and who made all things good. But even this ditticulty is obviated in Scripture, and by the fact that evil, wicked men do exist, and that C.od permitted such monsters of iniquity as Nero, Caligula, &<■., to exist in times past. If we have fallen from our first estate of jiurity, and become sinners, and God still permitted us to live, while we were still sinners, why should we find it unreasonable that even angels, though superior to us in wisdom and power, still finite creatures of God, should have fallen from their first estate and become devils, and God permits them to exist for wise purposes known only to himself? The fact that there are angels which kept not their first estate, is expressly declared in the word of God. See Jude 6: 2 ; Peter 2: 4. But while some believe too little with regard to the existence and personality, or reality as it is above expressed, of a devil, there are others who beleve too much, making of him almost a second God, all powerful and everywhere present. True, he is called the " God of this world," 2 Cor, 4 : 4. Admitted, also, that he is very powerful, knows a great deal, is very cunning and crafty, and, what is more than all, immortal. His empire is tar niiML' extensive than our globe; for he is " the prince of the power of the air,' thu atmosphere which surrounds the earth, Eph. 2: 2, and has under him " princi])alities — powers — the rulers of the darkness of this world," Eph. 6: 12, Keraember, also, that he is not alone, not a single individual, but a prince or chief of devils, Matt. 10 : 25 ; Luke 11 : 15, &c. ; that he has under him other angels, Matt. 25: 41 — multitudes of them, for he "drew the third part of the stars of heaven" after him in his fall. Rev. 12 : 4, and when "thousand thousands ministered unto him, and ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him" (the great Judge on the throne), Dan. 7: 10 — we may surmise that the number of falen angells amounts to many millions, DIFFERENCE IN DOCTRINE. 71 united under one head; and if mankind have been enabled, by their ingenuity and the help of elec tricity (the telegraph), to overcome time and distance in such a manner as to bring almost all the world into immediate correspondence and connection, then it does not seem unreasonable to suppose that the ingenuity of devils is sufficiently great, and " the power of the air" (electricity) enables them to be in constant rapport with one another and with their prince, and learning all human affairs of interest to theui, not only as soon as they occur, but as soon as they are spoken of by mankind, the greater part of which being under the immediate co.itrol of evil spirits, with the exception of those who have really renounced the devil and all sin, and become truly the obedient subjects of Christ, the Almighty King of kings, to whom even devils are subject. Hence, great as the power of the devil and his hosts among angels and men is. Christians with Christ on their side need not fear that power of darkness, if they are children of the light, and always on their guard and prayerful. As Christ overcame the tempter by rejecting his temptations through the word of G^d, and through sub- mission to the will of his heavenly Father, even unto death, even to the igno- minious death of the cross, so even the weakest Christian, standing in union with Christ and his church, will be enabled to withstand the powerful enemy of souls, and to be faithful unto death, even through Christ, and through him alone. But to deny the existence and to despise the power of the devil, and to neglect the means to escape from this power, is dangerous and foolish indeed. DIFFERENCE IN DOCTRINE. Y. M. 1844. Art. 7. How is considered the difference in doctrine, that some teach faith before repentance, and others repentance before faith ? Ans. This query had been before a council meeting some years ago, and was answered thus : " Considered, that the difference arises when the word is not rio-htly divided. The apostle teaches us that the righte- ousness of God is revealed in the gospel from fiiith to faith, Rom. 1 : 17j and again. That he who cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him. Ileb. 11 : 6. Out of this fiith, when it is quickened, repentance will come, an'd when the re- penting sinner hears and receives the blessed gospel, an evangelical and saving faith will issue therefrom, which worketh by love, and makes itself known by keeping the commandments." To which the brethren present fully assented. DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. Y. M. 1799. Art. 1. Whereas, there has existed for a long titue a great diflSculty between brother C. L. and brother J. Z., the overseers of church; and whereas, there have been expressed very grave ac- cusations and hard sayings by C. L. against some brethren, who shall be named hereafter, it has come to pass that brother C. L. has selected six brethren, and J. Z. has also selected six brethren, and they (both) have agreed to obey or submit to the advice or united counsel of those breth- ren, to which also the members (of the church) have consented. So we have assembled ourselves, we trust, in the fear of the Lord, and with a fervent prayer to God that he would bless our hi;arts with wisdom and understanding in order to be enabled to counsel our dear brethren wisely, and to come to conclusions evangelical, or according to the doctrine of the gospel. And after having heard the complaints and accusations (of both sides), we have become entirely agreed, and believe all that brother 72 DIFFICULTIES I^ CHURCHES. L. has done grossly wrong against brother Z., and also against brethren A. M. and M. U's. transactions, and against J. L. and J. St., and what- soever else might have been done (of the same nature). Further, we believe also that wrong has been committed by J. Z. against L., but not so grossly as brother L. has done. Hence it is our unanimous conclusion, that when C. L. believes in his heart and cordially makes acknowledgment before this present brotherly and member meet- ing, and also before (his own) meeting, and asks for pardon, and also makes heartfelt confession for the suspicious (and offensive) expres- sions against the old brethren, and against L. and J. St , then we will, and it is hoped the members will bear with him in patience, and he may continue to serve as overseer in W. church. And what concerns Z., we have agreed, that when he makes acknowledgment before the members that he has also done wrong, and asks pardon, he shall also serve as over- seer with L., yet so that in important matters, such as baptism, breaking of bread, receiving and excluding (members), he should not go on with- out L's. knowledge and consent ; but with regard to holding meetings, at- tending funerals, and solemnizing marriages, he shall have equal libertj with brother L. Now, whoever of them will not submit to this above stated counsel and conclusion shall stand still in his oflSce, until he is willing to accept it, and when it is accepted of both, there shall be here- after no more heard of those things which are past. Unanimously con- cluded by us, the subscribers: Martin Uruer, Martin Gaby, Henry Ban- ner, Peter Leibert, Jacob Danner, Philip Engler, Michael Pfoutz, Martin Garber, John Greib, Martin Garber, Daniel Utz, Philip Levy, Valentine Pressel, Stephan Ulrich. Y. M. 1803. Our cordial and united greeting of love to all our beloved brethren and members of the W church. We wish much grace, mercy and blessing from God, the Father of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, to all our fellow-members united with us in love and faith, as also especially to our dear brethren C. L. and J. Z. It is our hearts' desire that the good God would make us all faithful laborers in his vineyard ; for all that were hired by that householder were hired to labor in his vine- yard, to which we wish you all much grace, blessing and salvation from God. The cause of our present writing is this : Since we, or some of us, have been informed by our dear brother Martin Gaby, who, on his journey to us, passed through W , and also had meeting there, that brother C. L., since the big meeting, has only been a few times at meeting, and now for a considerable time has not come any more at all to meeting, so that some brethren feel oppressed in their minds on account of the word or expression which is found in that conclusion made at the big meeting, namely, "that brother J. Z. should not go on with baptism, breaking of bread, receiving and excluding, without L's. knowledge and consent;" hereupon we, the undersigned brethren, have conversed on the matter, and are of one mind on it, and now the same as it was at that time (three DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. ■73 years before), and is in part also expressed in said conclusion, though briefly, that we all considered that brother L. had done wrong grossly, and if he would believe it from the heart, and confess and make acknow- ledgnieut, we and hopingly the members would bear with him in patience, and then he should serve as overseer in W , and thus should brother Z. in such important matteis not go on without his knowledge and con- sent. But if brother C. L. withdraws from the service, or from the duty of his office, contrary to the doctrine of the apostle, when he says, "If any one has an office, let him attend to the same" (German translation, Rom. 12:7), if now brother L. withdraws himself from the service of the church as overseer, so as not to attend the meetings,- then he deprives himself of this honor, that brother Z. cannot counsel with him if he (bro. L.) does not attend meetings according to his duty. So it is our unanimous luind, that on this account brother Z. should not be bound or hindered to go on in his office, and faithfully discbarge its duties, and prove himself a faithful laborer. But if brother L. acknowledges according to said conclusion, and endeavors to be faithful in his office, then we desire and hope the members will receive him, and not lay obstacles in his way — we mean, on account of things that arc past. (Signed by most of those that signed the foregoing.) Y. M. 1814, May 28. It has been publicly treated at the big meeting, on Pipe Creek, about the lamentable disturbance and dissension which have arisen some time ago between bro. C. H. and some members of this church with him, of one part, and the old ministers and bishop, and especially P. E.and other members, of the other part. This disturbance and dissension have existed already several years, and after said old brethren and ministers and overseers in said cburch had made many efforts with the church to settle the difficulty with the assistance of God, the troublesome affair has got worse still, so that said old brethren and overseers of said church had no other prospect but to counsel with other or strange brethren, and have charged the beloved old brother Henry Danncr to see to it, that the matter might be settled and put to rest. Now the loving brother was concerned about it according to his duty, and has, with other strange brethren, paid a visit at Pipe Creek, and has bro. C. H. with his adherents invited to come to the council meeting. But bro. C. H. objected; he could not come on account of his sore hand, and they came not. To the loving brother Henry Danner, to whom as aforesaid was intrusted this important affair, it was a heavy burden; so he appointed another time, and requested old brethren from afar, and paid with them another visit at Pipe Creek, especially to bro. C. H. and some of his adherents, and invited them again to come to the (council) meeting. Bro. C. H again would not consent to come, and they did not come again, with the objection that it was not yet the time to settle the matter, and secondly, that they had not had sufficient information about the council meet- ing, and so they had not prepared their testimony. Then the dear brethren 74 DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. that had come from af;ir, counseled with the loving brother Danner, that this case should not remain thus, while there were members suffering under it, and some even hid to depart this life under this pressure and sorrow; under these considerations, and with the advice of some brethren (of the church probably), they appointed again another meeting some months hence, and at once wrote and signed a letter of information to bro. C. II., and appointed some brethren to bring the letter to bro. C. H.) and to read the same to him. When the appointed time of the meeting came near, that strange brethren should have come, at least twelve, then bro. C. H. before the time went and made reconciliation and settlement with bro. P. E. externally with hand and kiss before the church, so that many rejoiced over it, and the meeting and appointment for the strange brethren was recalled. But that settlement and peace, alas ! did not last long, and bro. C. H. with his adherents began again to complain against the church, and brought not only new complaints against the church, but raised also again the dispute about the land here and there, and without counsel and investigation in the church of the new complaints, and without counsel of other old brethren and bi*;hops, and entirely contrary to the word of God and to the order of our Chief Shepherd and Bishop of his church and Head of his members, caused a division, and tore himself with other members from the church and the members, whom he had brought into confusion and mistrust against the old brethren and church with the hard and suspicious complaints which he, and others, against the order of God, have scattered far and wide; while, with all the invitations when strange brethren came, they never came to this day, in order to prove them with suiEcient testi- mony, as it is required by the holy Scriptures or God in his word. He has now, with those members he led astray, formed a separate con- gregation, and broke bread with them, not at the proper time, inasmuch as we are not to keep the feast with the old leaven, neither with leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. Bro. C. II., with the others, have known that he was not in peace with the church, and especially with the housekeepers, nor they with him ; and the Lord Jesus teaches us in these his precious words, "If thou bring thy gift to the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath aught against thee, leave there thy gift before the altar, and go thy way ; first be reconciled to thy brother, and then come and offer thy gift." (JMatt. 5 : 23-24.) Those whose eyes are anointed can clearly see that the whole thing is perverse. For the Spirit of God leads into all truth and union, and " as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons (children) of God," and " by this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if you have love one to another." And not only this, but at said supper he has introduced strange exer- cises, which our dear old brethren have not had, who indeed, as we be- lieve, walked in the light, and in the pui-e knowledge of the truth kept DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. 75 house, and entered, as we hope, into blessed rest. And as some have heard, there has been drawn a shallow reason from Christ's words to that practice, whereby that practice cannot be established, and it is to be feared that said new practice is more calculated, to cause disturbance, trouble and division within, and rejoicing without among other denomi- nations, as if the old Baptists and brethren would have now to learn from them, that they had opened our eyes, and th'js seeking persons who are yet in the twiliuht, may be confused, thinking the old brotherhood must not have had the full light, else they would not begin new prac- tices, and thus this would serve more to scatter than to gather, and more to the dishonor than to the honor of God. Now since this matter has thus worked from time to time, as has been briefly related, we (the undersigned) upon the request of said church, and more for the sake of God, have found it our duty to take the case in con- sideration at this occasion, namely, in said big meeting; and several brethren have visited bro. C. H. and his wife, and others of his members, before the meeting, and have invited liim to come with his company, and bring his testimonies to prove his heavy complaints or accusations, in order that those members who might have committed a fault could be convinced, that there was hope, if they would, that all could be brought to rest and reconciliation. But he would not come to lay the case before the big meeting, and said there were too many judges at the big meet- ing — it would be better to have too few judges than too many. However, on the second day he came to the place of the meeting, and said if the matter was to be settled, the land would have to be altogether measured, and they would bear the expenses. But the council of the big meeting considered, that with further de- ferring the case could not be improved, and slowly or never be brought to an end, and the measuring would scarcely contribute to that end. Yet they shall have perfect liberty to have the land surveyed, as it has been spoken about. And upon the whole of said case it has been mutually concluded by the whole council of the big meeting, inasmuch as brother C. H. was never willing to come and bring sufficient testimony to prove said accusations, we will hear and accept the testimony of brother P. E. and of all those who were accused, on their good conscience, in hope and trust as being true, until sufficient testimony should come, as the Scrip- tures require ; and if sufficient testimony should come against one or the other, then shall he, who is concerned, submit to the council of the church, which brother P. and the accused have agreed to and promised before the big meeting. Upon this condition we declare the beloved brother P. E. and the other accused, as absolved, and intend at this and other occasions to break the bread of communion in confidence and love with them, and to hold with them full fellowship, as the Gospel of Jesus requires, and we wish them light, grace and power from God to hasten forward on the way of peace to the land of blessed rest. Amen 76 DIFFICULTIES IN CHUKCHES. Further, it was mutually concluded, that the case as above stated is wronp; and contrary to God's order according to the example and testi- monies of the Old and New Testament of the Lord. From these weighty causes the big meeting concludes, that impartial brethren should be se- lected, and they should give themselves up for Grod's sake, to pay the church a general visit from house to house, and before the meeting takes place to visit also brother C. H., and all those who have cut off them- selves with him, in a friendly manner, and to urge them to take steps to- ward peace, concord and reconciliation with the church and with God, in as far as mistakes have been made, and all those who should thus come should be cordially forgiven by the whole church. But if one or the other would not accept or receive counsel according to the doctrine of Christ and his apostles, and not abstain from their error, with such we could not break bread, and would have to deny to them the kiss and church council after a long-suffering and sufficient admonition; and if brother C. H., with all his adherents, should oppose themselves, we would have to hold them, as the Lord Jesus says, " If he shall neglect to hear the church, let him be unto thee as a heathen man and a publican." The whole big meeting, yea, all members should be en- gaged and prayerful, that God would meet us with his blessing and sal- vation. Amen. Signed, Samuel Garber, Benjamin Bowman, George Preiss, Daniel Stober, Nicholas Martin, Jacob Beshor, Samuel Arnold, Martin Garber, David Pfoutz, John Eby, Christian Long, John Schleifer, Daniel Loag, Daniel Garber, Michael Etter, Henry Gibbel, Herman Blaser, George Petry, Daniel Arnold, David Albaugh, John Diel, Jacob Sheuefelt, John Price, Isaac Long. In the year 1814, November 17, the strange brethren have come again to us on Pipe Creek about the difficulties with C. H. and his adherents, and have visited and admonished them again to peace, and union, and acknowledgment ; and with these linos we inform our dear members of Pipe Creek church, briefly, how we found it on our visit to C. H., and the members that have turned away from the church. What concerns brother C. II., the visiting brethren have proposed he or they should elect six brethren on their part whom they would, and they should search out their true testimonies ; and the old brethren on Pipe Creek should also elect six brethren and prepare their testimonies, and then the diffi- culties should be settled with the help of God according to the testimonies. Brother H. said he would have nothing to do with it, and that he would have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness. This was the amount upon the whole, upon which we told him the conclusion made at the big meeting. Likewise we have told brother J. W., upon his inso- lent and untrue asseverations, said conclusion. The said conclusion is, that if after patient admonition they would not return to union according to the truth of Jesus, we must deny to them according to the gospel the communion, in so far as not tu break bread with them, and to refuse the DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. kiss and counsel, until they should become repentant. We must observe here, that we have not seen any more of brother Benjamin Bowman and Nicholas Martin, after they had visited their part, and know not whether they have told the conclusion to any members. As concerning the other members, who are with C. H., it was found different; yet several have declared, that they would not fall away or separate from the old brethren ; still they are halting at several points. We have told some, by hearsay and suppositions, they had got off from the church thus far. Now they should only believe what can be testified ; in this way they might bo restored and put right again. In this manner all the members should labor in this case with prayer and supplication to God, that by his co-operating grace all, and especially those who long after peace, could come again to peace and union with the church according to the mind of the Spirit of Grod and his soul-saving truth, in hope that they will reflect and choose that, what is counseled them according to the gospel, namely, to strive after peace with the church. Thus we have told the other members we visited the conclusion only in this form, that those who would continue to adhere to C. H., and go on with him in his strange works, all such would be held as is expressed in the conclusion until they would return repent- ant; that is, all such who would continue to break bread with him, and justify his strange baptism. Signed, &c. We have given the above two lengthy records of an interesting part of the history of the Brethren, showing with what care, patience and long-suffering they dealt with erring members ; and what are the fearful consequences of a stubborn resistance to the counsel of the church and of God, became specially evident in the after life of said C. H., whom the writer saw personally some thirty years ago. (.'ne by one his adherents left him, and returned to the church. For a living he followed the distilling business, and at last he died in obscurity and poverty. Y. M. 1815. In the big meeting of the Brethren's church, which was held in White Oak church with brother Jo.*eph Hershe, May 1-3, 1S15, the following was discussed, and held counsel on the complaints arising in different parts of the church of the Br(ithren concerning strange views of some members, which are deemed by us as erroneous and not founded on the holy Scriptures, which holy Scriptures indeed shall be the sole foundation of our faith. And since we live now in perilous times, in which arise many and manifold temptations, and also many errors, so that weak minds may be easily led astray and in confusion, not knowing what or how to do in order to salvation. And inasmuch now, at this time, among the many religious parties and denominations there are such whose doctrines on repentance, on baptism, and on the forgiveness of sins, through the atoning sacrifice of Jesus, and on sanctification through the Holy Spirit, seem to differ not much from those of the old brethren, only that they, according to our views, as the word teaches us, do not put every thing in the right place. They require of a man, before he is to be baptized, that he should have passed entirely through repentance, and should have a lively expe- 78 DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. rience of the forgiveness of sins, and that he should have obtained the new birth completely before baptism, so that they must confess such and be enabled to say how they came to it ; and that only then they were fit to be received by baptism into the covenant of the grace of God. There should have been made even such expressions in public meeting, that a man must have obtained complete sanctification first, else he would be bap- tized too soon, as has been credibly testified. Now for such a confession or doctrine we see no foundation in holy writ, nor a single example in the whole New Testament. Candidates for baptism were directed to re- pent, or to a change of mind ; they were exhorted by John to bring forth Iruit meet for repentance, that is, to lead such a life as would be consistent with a change of mind ; and of Christ and his apostles we do not find that any more was required of candidates than besides repentance, faith in the gospel, item, faith in Jesus Christ as the Son of God. Hence we find no authority to ask more of candidates but what is founded in the word of God. We believe that baptism is the entrance into the new covenant ycccrding to the Scriptures. We also believe that the founda. tion which was laid by Christ and the apostfcs is the only foundation on which we have to build, and that we have no right to change or amend anything. We believe also that the (individual) cases of repentance are very different — that some have much greater difiiculties to overcome than others ; therefore we make (establish) no rule herein, because the Scripture does not give any. And since we cannot agree in the above named points, with such who hold those points as articles of their faith, inasmuch the word of God does not teach us thus, it happens sometimes that harsh expressions are made about the old brethrjn ; for instance, " that they were a crowd of dead men who had not yet come to a new life " unconverted, who knew nothing yet of conversion;" "a dead heap of flesh;" "as laying all in aheap in death;" that not one (of them) had come to a newness of life, or he could not remain among them ; and on account of their bap- tizing too soon, the life of God commenced in them was presently again extinguished, so that they could not come to the (new) birth, and .so forth. Such expressions do not proceed from love, nor will they build love. We would let these good people willingly (to enjoy their sentiments) in peace, if they would also permit us to enjoy (ours) in peace. It does not work unto union according ti the command of Christ. It causes schisms and divisions. It seems as if it was the object and purpose also in our churches to fill weak members with their notions, and to cause confusion, so that many members become doubtful of their old brethren, since they are represented to them so cold and dead. And such we coun- sel and admonish out of heartfelt love, that they should hold fast to the word of God, and not be carried about with every wind of doctrine. And it is our advice to all overseers and householders to admonish all the members to this, that they should take fast hold of the w'ritten word of DIFFICULTIES IN CHUKCHES. 79 the gospel ; and if it sliould happen that some of our members should unite with such, break the bread of communion with them, receive them in their houses to hold meetings, so long as those stand in such separa- tion against us, they (our members) should be admonished, and if they would give heed to it, we ought to have patience with them ; but if they would not hear or be advised, they could not stand in full fellowship with us. For the Lord Jesus and the apostles teach us that we should be one, of one mind, speak the same thing, and that there should be no division among us, and to this end we also labor to be obedient to the gospel of Jesus Christ by the grace of God. Y. M. 1820. In the counsel of the assembled brethren at the big meeting in Lancaster county, Pa., in Conestoga church, at brother Joseph lloyer's, May 19, 1820, was proposed for cocsideration in church council the dis- turbances or troubles arising in the State of Ohio, in Mill Creek church, by diverse doctrinal points, which have been there introduced, viz., it has been taught by brother A. M., who is a colaborer in the word, that a man mast have a real experience of the forgiveness of sins, and that ho must be entirely born anew before he is baptized, which has been credibly tes- tified. And it was considered at this meeting, that there is no gospel evidence for such doctrine, and it was concluded with one accord and unanimity, that if a brother will preach and persist in such doctrine, he could not be permitted to teach; for it is not consistent with the teaching of the apostle, when he says. Acts 2 : 38, " Repent, and be baptized every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost." This is thus laid down until such brother will prove his or such doctrine on the ground of the word of God. It was also considered, that brother J. K. went too far with the harsh expressions he made against brother A. M. in presence of the brethren, and it is required of him to make acknowledgment for such hard expressions, or else we could not be we'd with him. N. B. The expressims were these, that he is to have said, from the teaching of brother M., there was apparent a spirit of iMethodism and of the Kiver Brethren, and an Antichrist, &.C., &.c. Y. M. 1835 (Miami). Art. 1. Concerning the trouble between brother M. L. and the church, L. was earnestly admonished by the old brethren to amend his ways, not to creep into houses in order to bring members into confusion, and cause division in the church, inasmuch they (the old brethren) saw and understood what manner of spirit was in him. For if he should come so far as to speak in a traducing and railing spirit against the church, he would have to be put in avoidance. Y. M. 1848 (Indiana). Art. 3. How is it cunsidered, when a part, say a minority of a church, disowns the other part, or a majority of the members, without taking a legal or scriptural course, and without givmo- a legal notice to the tody of the church, and not showing or informing the disowned members wherein they transgressed ? The difficulties in 80 DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. this case occupied the greater part of Monday and Tuesday, and lastly were postponed for decision until Wednesday morning. — Art. 12. In re- gard to the third query of the difficulties of Bachelor's Run church with brother Oyman, Patton, and others, the brethren in general council con- sidered, that there had been committed errors on both sides, in conse- quence of which many members on both sides made satisfactory acknow- ledgments before the meeting; and it was concluded, that with such all that is past be forgiven and forgotten, and with as many as may yet come and make satisfaction, and that they all should be received into full fel- lowship and brother David Fisher in his office as a speaker; furthermore, this meeting considers and counsels, that brothers O. and P., and such others that hold yet with them, should have still time to reflect, and should they come also in a reasonable space of time, and make satisfac- tory acknowledgments, the church should also be willing to forgive them. But if they should persist in their contrary course, going on in holding meetings in opposition to the church, and even become railers of the church, there would be no other way than to put them into full avoidance, according to 1 Cor. 5. — Art. 13. A long letter about difficulties in the Eel River church, and requesting the assistance of this meeting. Con- sidered, that this meeting feels a deep concern for our brethren on Eel river, who are aggrieved and distressed on account of those difficulties exist- ing among them, and that we would, if possible, most willingly investigate their case fully and impartially. But having spent already three days in council, and many members having already left this meeting; being also assured that those difficulties could not be settled here, and that there would be a small hope of making a final settlement just now; and on the other hand, a hope being expressed that the time might soon come when they could be settled satisfactorily to all parties — a result most devoutly to be desired — it was concluded, to lay down this case with our most solemn warning and earnest advice to our beloved brethren on Eel river, that they should lay aside all uncharitableness, envy and evil spaak- ing, and in all private matters of difference to take the gospel rule for a guide (Matt. 18 : 15, ff.) ; for while ill feeling and a neglect of the word of God exists, it will be impossible to restore peace. But when they have laid down all private and family and party affaii'S, and are willing again to walk together in the gospel road, yet do not feel confident of being able to get into it without assistance, let them choose those who are to assist them in the work of reconciliation. Should they, however, fail in this, let them apply to the next annual meeting for a reconsidera- tion of their case. Y. M. 1849. Art. 15. About the still existing difficulties in Bach- elor's Run church, Carroll county, Indiana. Concluded in general coun- cil, that brother Peter Nead and Michael Moyer, of Montgomery, and brother Daniel Miller, of Preble, (all of) Ohio, with such other brethren as they may see proper to call to their assistance, should be a committee DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. 81 to visit said church, and try once more to settle the difficulties there existing. Y. M. 1850. Art. 1. A request that counsel be given to the church on Eel river, Ind., in order that the difficulties there existing might be settled. Concluded, that inasmuch as the said church is in an unrecon- ciled state toward one another, this meeting doth appoint brother Peter Nead, David Bowman, Jr., Daniel Miller, and Ah. Erbaugh, of Ohio, and Jacob Miller, James Tracey, and David Hartman, of Indiana, as a committee to visit said church, and assist in settling the existing diffi- culties. Y. M. 1851. Art. 1. A letter from Knob Creek church, East Ten- nessee, concerning a confusion and division in that church. Concluded, that a committee should be appointed by the Y. M. to go to East Ten- nessee to assist the brethren there in adjusting their difficulties, and that this committee and others of the same character be appointed by the gen- eral committee. The following brethren were appointed for this busi- ness, viz.; \i. Bowman, John Harshberger, John Kline, and Daniel Brower, all of Rockingham, and B. Moomaw, of Roanoke, Virginia. Art. 4. A request from brethren in Shelby county, Ohio, for a com- mittee to examine into the proceedings of the Logan church in a case of excommunication. Concluded, that brethren George Shively and Joseph Shovvalter, of Stark, John Molsbaugh, of Knox, John Shoemaker, of Mo- hegan church, and Jacob Kurtz, of Wayne county, be a committee to visit said churches in Logan and Shelby. — Art. 5. A letter about the diffi- culties in Salamony church, Indiana. Concluded, that brethren John Miller, of Elkhart, llenry Neft', of Turkey Creek, David Shoemaker, of Huntingdon, Nich. Frantz, of Eel river, and Abraham Moss and John Bowman, of Wayne county, Ind., be a committee to visit said church. Art. 11. An appeal to this yearly meeting from Whiteoak church, in Lancaster county. Pa., to appoint a committee to investigate, and, if pos- sible, to settle the difficulties existing there. Considered, to grant the request, and to appoint brother Andrew Spanogle, Peter Long and Sam- uel Lehman, of Pennsylvania, and brother Phil. Boyle and D. P. Sayler, of Maryland, to be the committee. Y. M. 1852. Art. 1. See " Far Western Brethren."— Art. 15. The committee appointed last year to visit Salamony church, in this State (Indiana), in order to settle the difficulties there, reported that they could not yet accomplish the object of their appointment; but that there was nOw a prospect of doing it, and request some more brethren to be added. Concluded, that the committee should be reappointed with the addition of James Tracey, of Elkhart, and Jacob Miller, of Portage. — Art. IG. Request of a committee to go to Tiffin church, Seneca county, Ohio (to examine and adjust a case), concerning a sister, whose husband left (de- serted) her, and she remained thus forsaken for seven years, but has now got a bill of divorce, and is married again. The following brethren were 6 82 DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. proposed and appointed as a committee to investigate and settle this busi- ness : Joseph Showaltcr, of Stark, John Molsbaugh, of Knox, John Shoemaker, of Mohegan. Elias Dicky, of Ashland, and Jacob Kurtz, of Wayne county, all in Ohio. — Art. 25. A call for a committee to be sent to J onathan's Creek church, Ohio. The following brethren were appointed for this bufiness, viz : John Molsbaugh, John Shoemaker, John P. Eber- sole, Jacob Kurtz and Henry Davy. — Art. 26. A request for a committee to visit two church districts in Montgomery county, Ohio. The request (was) granted by nominating Benjamin Bowman and David Hardman, of Indiana, and Daniel Miller, of Preble, George Butterbaugh, ot Miami, John Frantz, of Clarke, Michael Meyer, of Montgomery, and Abraham Miller, of Allen, all in Ohio. — Art. 28. A request from the church be- tween Salem and Union, in Montgomery county, Ohio, for the assistance of a committee. This request was also granted by appointing George Hoover, of Henry, George W. Studebaker, Daniel 3Iiller, of Fourmile. John Shively and Martin Cable, all of Indiana, to be said committee. — Art. 30. A petition signed by more than seventy members, for a camuiittee to in- vestigate the case of Daniel Zook, in Suakespring Valley, Pa. Granted, by appointing Peter Long, Andrew Spanogle and Jacob Meyer, of Penn- sylvania, and Joseph Arnold and Jacob Biser, of Virginia, to be said committee. Y. M. 1853. Art 10. A request from the church in WiHiaiiis county, Ohio, for a visit in order to settle difficulties among the leading members of said church. It was concluded, to appoint a committee consisting of Jacob Miller, of Portage, Indiana, Ab. Mi.ler, of Allen, John P. Eber- sole, of Seneca, and Elias Dicky, of Ashland, all in Ohio (with the ex- ception of the first). — Art. 40. Report from Jonathan's Creek church in Ohio, and repeated request for a new committei. Request granted, end brother George Shively (added to former committee, names given above already). Y. M. 1854. Art. 17. A request for a committee to visit LTpper Conewago church, Pennsylvania. Granted, and brethren Jacob Sayler, of Maryland, William Boyer, of Franklin, John Berkley, of Somerset, Isaac Myers, of Union, and Jacob Hollinger, of Dauphin county, Pa , nominated as such committee. Art. 26. A request from Coventry church, Chester county, Pa., for a committee to examine grievances and difficul- ties there existing. The request granted, and the following brethren ap- pointed: Phil. Boyle and D. P. Sayler, of Maryland, John Kline, of Virginia, and Samuel Harley, Jacob Wenger and Christian Longenecker, of Pennsylvania. Art. 27. A similar request for a committee to visit the Lower Cumberland church in Pennsylvania. Also granted, and brethren Isaac Pfoutz, of Maryland, Samuel Miller, Peter Long, Andrew Spanogle and David Bosserman, of Pennsylvania, nominated for this committee. Y. M. 1855. Art. 1. A request for a committee to visit Sugar Creek DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. 83 congregation in Tuscarawas county, Ohio. Granted, &c. — Art. 13. A request for a committee to visit the church in Tulpehocicen, Lebanon county, Pa. Grranted, &c. — Art. 16. A private letter requesting a com- mittee to settle difficulties in Mahoning church, Ohio. Privately an- sw^'rod by the committee. — Art. 31. A request for a committee to visit the church in Owen county, Ind. Left, over to Elder John Metzger, to go there with some more brethren (and at least one more elder) to inves- tigate the case. Y. M. 1*"56. Art. 7. A request by the church in Carroll county. 111., for a committee to settle the difficulties existing there. Granted, &c. Art. 28. A request from the church in Fayette county. Pa., to have our dear brother. James Quiuter, ordained for the office of an overseer at this yearly meeting. Concluded, that inasmuch this brother had not been able to be present here, brother Joseph Showalter, of Stark, and Henry Kurtz, of Mahoning, Ohio, be appointed as a committee to attend to this business. — Art. 3U. Request from the church on Owl creek, Knox county, Ohio, for a committee to settle some difficulties. — Art. 31. Re- quest from Hunterdon county, N. J., for a committee to investigate cer-- tain matters in the church there. (Both requests were granted ) — Art. 32. In regard to the still existing difficulties in the Coventry church, Chester county, Pa., we could see no other remedy, than either the whule church unite sincerely to submit to the advice given by the Y. M. and the committee sent there in 1854, or to establish that part of the church which is so inclined as a separate body or church ; and in order to accomplish either a true reconciliation or peaceable separation, the last named committee be also appointed for this business, and likewise f ir that on Indian creek, referred to in Art. 21 above. — Art. 35. Concerning difficulties in Covington church, Miami county, Ohio, brethren were ap- pointed as a committee. — Art. 36. A request from the church in Highland county, Ohio, for a committee to visit said church. Granted likewise. Y. M. 1857. — Art. 7. A request for a committee to visit the church in Monroe county, Iowa. The request was granted, &c. — Art. 18. A request for a committee to visit the Swatara church, in Dauphin county, Pa. Also granted. — Art. 26. A request for a committee to visit the church in Clarion county. Pa., to settle difficulties. Likewise granted. Art. 27. A request for a committee to visit the Ridge church in Cum- berland county. Pa. — Art. 28. A request for the committee to visit the Tuipehocken church in Lebanon county, Pa , to settle difficulties existing there. — Art. 35. A request for a committee to visit the Ashland church, Ohio. All granted. Y. M. 1S58. Art. 13. If the churches demand committees by the annual meeting to visit them and to settle difficulties among them, would it be advisable for such churches to defray the expenses of said com- mittees ? Ans. The churches calling committees should defray the trav- eling expenses. Art. 15. Would it not be agreeable to the gospel and 84 DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. the order of the brethren, when the standing committee appoints com- mittees, to go to other churches to settle difficulties, to authorize such brethren that circumstances will not permit to attend such council, to send some other ordained brethren in their places, so that there will be a full committee ? Considered, that it is the duty of such brethren that cannot go to appoint others in their places, that the committee may be full — Art. 59. Requests for committees : 1st, to visit Conestoga church, Lancaster county, Pa.; 2d, to visit Painter Creek church, Miami county, Ohio; 8d, to visit the Owl Creek church, Knox county, Ohio. (They were all granted.) Y. M 1859. Art. 36. Requests for committees: 1st, to visit Sugar Creek church, Tuscarawas county, Ohio, to investigate grievances ; 2d, to visit Upper Conewago church, Adams county, Pa. (The requests were granted.) Y. M. 1860. Art. 13. Requests for committees: 1st, to visit the Limestone congregation in Washington county, Tenn., to settle existing difficulties ; 2d, to visit the church in Cedar county. Mo.; 3d, to visit the Ridge church in Cumberland county. Pa., to investigate grievances therein existing. (All granted, and committees appointed.) Inasmuch this practice of appointing special cotninittees for settling difficul- ties in churches, nnd the nninutes do not state either the diflBculties, nor how they were settled, the mentioning of the above requests for the 10 — )2 yeirs be- fore 1860 has only so much of a general interest as to give the careful reader food for reflection, why it is that so many churches year after year have diffi- culties and grievances, for which they must have committees from afar, in order to have them settled, and that in some cases, after the committees have done all they could, the difficulties still continue to exist, and are as unsettled as before ? But in order to draw out from the above records some useful lessons, we will think, in the first place, of the most common CAUSES OF SUCH DIFFICULTIES. When a physician is called in a case of bodily sickness, it ip of advantBge to him to know the cause of the trouble, in order to perform a cure. He will say, " If I can remove the cause, it will be an easy matter to remove the disease by proper remedies and treatment." But not only to the physician, who desires to fulfill his highly responsible calling in the most faithful, most conscientious and most beneficial manner, but to every intelligent parent or child, nurse or pa- tient, it is of advantage to know and understand the most common causes of dis- ease, in order to guard themselves or others against them. Even so it v/ill be highly proper and useful in church difficulties to trace them to their causes. And it is a remarkable fact, that the most difficult cases had the same origin, or proceeded from the same cause, as the first great difficulty in the Christian church did; see Acts 15: 1, where we read, "And certain men who came down from Judea, taught the brethren: Except ye are circumcised after the custom of Moses, ye cannot be saved." A CHUKCH NOT TO BE BLAMED, WHEBE A DIFFICULTY RISES. The church where the first great difficulty arose was the first Gentile church at Antioch, of which we read, Acts U : 19-30, how some of those scattered abroad by the persecution came there, "preaching the glad tidings of ihe Lord Jesus, and the hand of the Lord was with them; and a great number believed, and turned to the Lord ; " how Barnabas was sent forth from Jerusalem to go as far as Antioch, "who, when he came and saw the grace of God, rejoiced," and (aa it seems, after his arrival) " a great multitude was added to the Lord." Then Barnabas went to Tarsus to seek for Saul, and brought him to Antioch, and DIFFICULTIES IN CHURCHES. 85 tbey were tbore "a whole year," and such was their success, that "the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch." Here also the first move was made "to send relief to the brethren dwelling in Judea." Here in Antioch, also, the first move was made of sending out brethren from their midst (that would be called now-a-days missionaries) to spread the gospel in other lands and nations. See Acts 13 : 1, 2, 3. And it appears that while Paul and Barnabas were absent from Antioch on their mission, certain believing men from Judea had come there, and being strict Jews, and perhaps Pharisees, they preached Moses, as well as Christ, and thus caused disturbance and confusion. Who will now blame the church at Antioch for this ? Or who would bla'ne our brethren, when, soon after they had settled in this country, and were engaged in the same work like Paul and Barnabas, of spreading gospel truth and planting gospel churches, one of their new converts arose, and preached, "Except ye keep the seventh day, or Sabbath, after the custom of Moses, ye cannot be my brethren?" NOR IS A CHURCH TO BE BLAMED, BECAUSE A DIFFICULTY CANNOT BE SETTLED AT ONCE. Undoubtedly the church at Antioch had tried to oppose error, and maintain the truth, befiire Paul and Barnabas returned ; but in restoring peace and union on the point urged by the Jewish brethren, they had not succeeded. Neither did Paul and Barnabas succeed to make an end of the " no small discussion and disputation" with those Judaizing brethren. "But they (who ? — the brethren or church at Antioch) determined that Paul and Barnabas, and certain others with theiu, should go up to Jerusalem to the apostles and elders, about this ques- tion." Indeed, after the council in Jerusalem was held, and the question was settled to the satisfaction of all present, and of the church at Antioch especially, we find long after unmistakable signs, in the epistles of the apostle, of the con- tinued existence of the same error. See Gal. 5 : 2 ; 6: 13, &c. THE GOSPEL PLAN FOR SETTLING DIFFICULTIES IN THE CHURCHES, According to the example recorded. Acts 15, and according to the law of Christ by analogy and generiil application of Matt. 18: 15-20, seems to be this: 1. The church of <'hrist is in the Scriptures represented as a unit3% as a body, of which Christ is the head, as a bride, as the Lamb's wife, and particular churches or congregations are as individual members or parts of the body, consisting of all individual persons who have professed repentance for their sins, and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, and obedience to his lasvs. 2. Now as all brothers and sisters are fallible, and liable to err and to commit trespasses, and consequently, according to the law of Christ, are bound to be open to conviction, and to take counsel not only from the church, and not only from a select part of it, but from the very least and most humble member that may feel offended, so each congregation, consisting of fallible men and women, must acknowledge to be bound by the same law of Christ, so that if a sister church should be grieved or ofl"eDded by another sister church, it is her duty to take the same course as the private brother or sister has to take in such case. 3. That this gospel rule is perfectly practicable between churches, as well as between private members, there is no doubt, if the right spirit of faithfulness and humility in love prevails. Suppose the church in A gives ofifen'^e to the neighboring church in B by tolerating things among her members which those in B deem hurtful, and contrary to the principles of the gospel. Now if the church, willing to obey the same law whose observance they require of every young member, as well as old, and inspired by the same spirit of love, humility aud faithfulness toward their sister churches they inculcate to their members to cherish toward each other, then the church at B will select two of her ministering brethren to go to the church at A , and tell her in private (first to the leading members, and, if required, to the membership altogether) what grieves their members at B . If this first sttp is taken and received in the right spirit, as with individuals, no further step need be taken. But if the sister at A will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two (sister churches or their representatives) more, as the second step ; and if she (sister A ) shall neglect to hear them (her two or three sister churches), tell it unto the church (represented in a yearly meeting), who, as the bride of Christ, will see his laws obeyed and exe<;uted, " as it is written." Alas ! that this golden rule of Christ is so much neglected t If it were not so, if members and churches were all striving to carry it out faithfully, what glorious 86 DISCIPLINE OF CHILDREN. progress would wo all make toward a still higher degree of purification, holiness and peace and union in love! How S'^on wonld every trouble vanish, every difficulty be overcome, and every schism be healed ! But let us remember there is a condition sine qua r,on, »nd that is, we must fellow strictly the apostolic example in settling difficulties, if we desire to meet with the same measure of success iis th( y did. How do we read Acts 15: 22, " T/ien the apostles and the eUlers. with the whnte church, rexolved, <5"c ?" Let us carefully' and rever iitly co-template every word of this brief part of a sentence. Then, when, after much discussion, Peter had spuken (v. 7-11), and "all the multitude became silent," satisfied with the views Peter bad expressed, and now giving car to " Barnabas and Paul narrating" what God had wrought among the Gentiles (v. 12), and then " when James had given his testimony to Peter's discourse, and brought the question to a still more practical issue, thus confirming the people still more in their union of sentiment with the apostles, "then' resolved, who? — " t/ie apostles" - not only the two that had spoken, or whose words were at least recorded ; not only a minority, or even a majority ; not only some of them, but we are compelled to believe that all the apostles p'esent without an exception agreed in the resolution, and not the apostles only, for it is said, '-nnd the elders," from which words we must also conclude that all those present of that character were united in the same "resolve," wbe'her thej were elders residing in Jerusalem, or elders sent as delegates from other cities or countries , "with the whole church" — not without the church, not with a part only, not with a iittle less than half of the church, or a minority, nor with a little more than half, which would be called a majority ; no, no, it was with the whole church resolved; what they did was done -'toith one accord;" thty all ayreed, " having become of one viind." And how did this happen ? '■'■For it seemed good to the Holy Spirit, and to tis" (v. 28). This explains the mystery. The apostles and elders, with the whole church, tried to learn, first, not what seemed good to 'hemselves, to their own spirits, but what seemed good to the Holy Spirit; and after learning that, they did not wish to entertain a diL'erent opinion, but what seemed good to the Holy Spirit seemed also good to themselves. Will our dear brethren of this latter age learu the solemn lesson inculcated by word and example of primitive Christianity? DISCIPLINE OF CHILDREN. Y. M. 1789. Art. 2 Inasmuch as many of our children and young people fall into a coarse life, and a great occasion of it seemM to be a want that there is not sufficient diligence used in instructing the children according to the word of the Lord given by Moses in Deut. 6 : 7, where we read : "And thou shalt teach them (these words which I command thee this day) diligently unto thy children, and shalt talk of them when thou sittest in thy house, and when thou walkest by the way, and when thou liest down, and when thou risest up;" and also, the apostle Paul says, Ephes. G : 4, that parents should " bring them (their children) up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord it is our opinion (and ad- vice) that there should be used more diligence to instruct our dear youth and children in the word of truth to their salvation, and that it is the special duty of the dear parents, as well as of the pastors and teachers, to be engaged herein, inasmuch as the apostle teaches, ''Feed the flock of God which is among you, taking the oversight thereof" (1 Pet. 5 : 2); and inasmuch as the children of the faithful belong to the flock of Christ, just as naturally as the lambs belong to the flock of sheep ; and inasmuch as the word can be brought nearer to the hearts of children in a simple conversation or catechization, or however it may be called, than other- wise in a long sermon, so that they apprehend the word of divine truth, believe in Jesus Christ, and accept his doctrine and commandments, and DISTRICT MEETINGS. 87 walk therein to their eternal salvation — hence we admonish in heartfelt and humble love all our in God much beloved follow members, dear fathers and mothers of families, as also pastors and teachers, our in God much loved fellow laborers, in the dear and worthy name of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has given himself unto death for us, that we should die to ourselves, and live to him forever, that they would use all possible diligence, thut our dear youth might be provoked to love God, and to appreciate his word from their childhood. Do not spare any labor and toil to convince them by our teachiug and by our life, not after the man- ner, which is almost too common now-a-days, where the young are made to learn something by heart, and then to rehearse it in a light (thought- less) manner, and then are permitted to go on in a life as thoughtless as before — but that they may give themselves up to God in an earnest life. The great Rewarder of all good will undoubtedly well remunerate you ; for those that have done right shall live forever, and the Lord is their re- ward, and the Most High provides for them ; they will receive a glorious kingdom and a beautiful crown from the hand of the Lord. Sap. 17 : 17. Y. M. 1831. Art. 1. Whether it was considered advisable for a member to have his son educated in a college ? Considered, not advis- able, inasmuch as experience has taught that such very seldom will come back afterward to the humble ways of the Lord. Y. M. 1857. Art. 10. How is it considered for brethren, and espe- cially ministering brethren, to adorn their children with ear rings, breast pins, finger rings, and jewelry in general, and send them from home to have them taught music, and to procure pianos for them? Ans. Brethren should not do so. Y. M. 18G2. Art. 34. Can this annual meeting allow brethren, and especially the bishops and ministering brethren, to suffer their children, while under their control, to follow all the foolish ftishions of this world, such as wearing of hoops and unnecessary ornaments of the body ? Ans. We consider such things should not be tolerated by the brethren, where they can reasonably be prevented. DISCIPLINE OF THE CHURCH. See ''Order of the Church:' DISTILLERIES. See "Ardent Spirits." DISTRICT MEETINGS. Y. M. 1856. Art. 23. A proposal of forming districts of five, six or more adjoining churches for the purpose of meeting jointly at least once a year, settling difl&culties. &c., and thus lessening the business of our General Y. >I.; we believe this plan to be a good one, if carried out in the fear of the Lord. Y. M. 1>5G2. Art. 58. Inasmuch as the brethren in annual council of 1856 have recommended the churches to hold district or council meet- ings, and with this we have complied, now we wish to know whether we 88 DISTRICT MEETINGS. stouid take minutes of our proceedings ? Ans. We consider that no question of importance acted on by the sub-district meeting should be coniirmed until presented to the annual meeting for its sanction. Y. M. 1863. Art 23. Would it not be better for the church, if this - Y. M. would adopt the district meetings, so that the difiFerent States may form their districts as they may see proper ? Considered, to leave this matter as it stands on the minutes of 1856, Art 23. Y. M. 1864. Art. 13. As the annual meeting has recommended the holding of district meetings, we wish to know from it, whether it would be advisable to make a record of the proceedings of such district meet- ings '/ Ans. We would advise to keep no record of proceedings but what is to be submitted to the annual meeting. — Art. l-l. Does the de- cision of the annual meeting of 1862, Art. 58, prohibit us from taking the minutes of the proceedings of our district meetings for our own benefit? Ans. Yes ; we consider that it does. — Art. 31. Since the yearly meeting favors district meetings for the purpose of adjusting local dif- ficulties, and lessening the labor of the yearly meeting, would it not be advisable to form regular districts in each State, and close them with lines, that individual churches may know to what district they belong ? And if so, should not this Y. M. appoint brethren in each State to form such districts in their respective States, and close them by making such lines ? Ans. Yes, but we will leave the districting of the States to the churches in the respective States. Y. M. 1866. We recommend that each State form itself into con- venient district meetings. These meetings shall be formed by one or two representatives from each organized church, and we recommend that each church be represented in the district meeting, either by representa- tives or by letter. We think it best to hold those meetings in simplicity, and as much like the common council meetings are held as possible. A record of the district meetings may be kept, but not published. They should endeavor to settle all questions of a local character But those of a general character, or those that concern the brotherhood in general, should be taken to the annual meeting. And all questions that cannot be settled at the district meetings, should be taken to the annual meet- ing. In taking questions from the district to the annual meeting, they should be correctly and carefully formed. And all queries from district meetings should be accompanied with an answer. But in case those meetings cannot agree upon any questions, then they shall be referred to the standing committee, and this shall form answers to the questions be- fore they be read before the general council. And it is considered very desirable, and indeed necessary, that in all cases, in answering questions both in district and annual meetings, some Scripture authority, or rea- son, be given for the decision, though it should be done as briefly as possible. No business can come before district meetings until it has passed DIVORCE. 89 through the church in which it originated. It is understood that any member falling under the council of the church, and being dissatisfied with the decision, may appeal to the annual meeting by presenting a petition signed by a number of the members of the church. Nothing in this arrangement shall be so construed as to prevent any member from presenting himself before the standing committee of A. M. to offer any- thing that cannot be brought before it in the manner prescribed, and the committee shall hear his case, and dispose of it according to its judgment. DIVISIONS. Sec ''DiJJiculiies in Churches." DIVORCE. (See Adultery," where many counsels refer to this mat- ter.) Here are some facts : In the year 1865 eight hundred and thirty-seven divorces were i;rantpil in tlie single State of Ohio, and if we talce this as a fair average of all the Stati's, tlie number of divorces iu the United States in that one year cannot have been less than ten thousand. This fact is elicited from a respectable religious paper in Ohio. A correspondent in another paper, either from Missouri or Kansas, as both names are given in the article incidentally, complains " that divorced ])ersons marrying again are treated by the church (what church is not stated) as though they were not adulterous, and frequently aim at more than ordinary excellence. A pettish prude (woman), thrice divorced and four times married, seeks divorce again, with a view to (a fifth) marriage, and still retains her church connection. Should these things be ?" That this evil of frequent divorces exists not only in the West, but also in the East, is evident from the report of a special committee of ministers in New Eng- land, appointed to inquire : •' In what degre" do the State laws of divorce deviate from the law of the New Testament?" The result of this inquiry is given in a religious paper of New York, as follows: " 1. According to the word of God, there is but one legal cause for divorce, namely, fornication, by which is here to be understood either adultery after marriage, or perhaps also fornication committed before marriage with a third person. But when this latter sin was known to the other party before their marriage, it cannot afterward five a cause for divorce any more. " 2. This so defined sin justifies the offended party to seek a dissolution of the marriage covenant, though in all cases where repentance appears, it is more becoming to the Christian to forgive and forget. "3. Christian churches in their discipline should acknowledge no other cause for divorce as legal. They cannot be guided in this matter by tlie civil law, but mufet, notwithstanding all difficulties, obey the divine law. " 4. According tu the word of God, the innocent party may be allowed to sepa- rate from the guilty party in bed and board ; yet both parties remain in such case bound, and neither can marry again, while both shall be living, without com- mitt-ng adultery." Without giving any more opinions of men, let us look up the word of the Lord on this delicate and important point at once. 1. Matt. 5:31, 32. Here the Lord from heaven spoke in his sermon on the mount, thus : " It hath been said, Whosoever shall put away his wife, let him give her a writing of divorcement; but I say unto you, That whosoever shall put away his wife, saving for the cause of fornication, causeth her to commit adultery; and whosoever shall marry her that is divorced, committeth adultery." 2. Matt. 19 : 3, 9. " The Pharisees also came unto him, tempting him, and saying unto him, Is it lawful for a man to put away his wife 90 DOCTRINES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. for every cause ? And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made them at the beginning, made them male and female ; and said, For this c;iuse shall a man leave father and mo- ther, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh. Wherefore they are no more twain, but one flesh. What therefore Grod has joined together, let not man put asunder. They say ujjto him. Why did Moses then command to give a writing of divorcement, and to put her away ? He saith unto them, Moses, because of the hardness of your hearts, suffered you to put away your wives : but from the beginning it was cot so. And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery; and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adul- tery." o. Mark 10 : 2-9, corresponds with Matt. 19 : 3-6, above; vers. 10- 12. "And in the house his disciples asked him again of the same mat- ter. And he saith unto them, Whosoever shall put away his wife, and marry another, committeth adultery against her. And if a woman shall put away her husband, and be married to another, she committeth adul- tery." 4. Luke 16:18. "Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery; and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband, committeth adultery." 5. Rom. 7 : 1-3. " Know ye not, brethren (for I speak to them that know the law), how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth '! For the woman which hath a husband, is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. So then, if while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress; but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man." 6. 1 Cor. 7 : 10-11. " And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband : but and if she depart, let her remain unmarried, or be reconciled to her husband: and let not the husband put away his wife." From all the gospel teaches, as here stated, our brethren could not come to any other conclusion but the following : That in the New Testament there is no warrant at all for a divrrce with a view to marriage, or to marrying again ; that in the exceptional case, where fornication has been committed by the ont' party, the innocent party may sep^i'-ate from the guilty, but is ''to remain unmarried, or be reco:iciled" again to the former companion, upon repentance shown by genuine fruits; that the church of Christ is bound by the «bove stated declarations of Christ and his apostles to guard and testify against the increasing evil of frequent d'vorccs in our land, bv discountenancing and disallowing any transgression of the law of Christ in .'his respect, as far as our own members are concerned. "But them that are without God judgeth." 1 Cor. 5: 13. DOCTRINES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. Y. M. 1785. Our cordial and united wish and greeting of love and DOCTRINES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. 91 peace to the beloved members, brethren and sisters on South Branch, especially to the loving brethren Valentine Power and Martin Power, and all the members in your vicinity. We wish you all much grace and peace from God the Father through Jesus Christ, his dear Sun, to be faithful to him from the bottom of the heart according to the guidance and direction of his holy and good Spirit, even unto a blessed and God- pleasing end. Amen. Inasmuch as we have in part seen, and also heard, that there has arisen some difference in several doctrines among some brethren of your church and others, and h<>ving also seen the letter of the loving brother Valentine I'owcr, which he has written to the big meeting, and heard from it his views about "carrying on war," which are to be proved especially from the words of Peter (1 Peter 2 : 13, ff.), so we have considered and weighed the matter in union and, we trust, in the fear of the Lord ; but yet, for the sake of the word of God, we could not agree with such view, because we do not see it so, and do not understand so the loving Peter in that self-same chapter, nor in his other discourses; but God grant that we may be directed, according to his good pleasure. First, we do not understand at all from the words of Peter alluded to, that we can give ourselves up to do violence, or that we should submit to the higher powers in such a manner as to make ourselves their instru- ments to shed men's blood, however it might be done. It is indeed dif- ficult to believe that Peter, what he teaches in one place, should have rejected in another place. Therefore we cannot understand him thus, but that his mind and admonition to "submit to every ordinance of man, &c.," is something different. The question arises, How far or wherein are we to submit ourselves? and this question the loving Peter may answer himself. We find (Acts 5 : 28) that the higher power to which Peter and John were subjects had commanded them straitly (in our German version, earnestly) that they should not teach in this name (the name of Jesus) any more, but they (the apostles) did not obey herein. And when they were asked again, " Did we not straitly command you, Ike," i\ien Peter and the other apostles answered and said, " We ought to obey God rather than men." It will be well, when we attend always to the sense of Holy Writ strictly ; and in the very same chapter of Peter alluded to, we see clearly that Peter exhorts for conscience toward God to endure grief and to suffer wrongfully, and says even that Christ became in this our example, that we should follow his steps. Now we see that Christ always in all his sufferings endured them, and that with great patience, and never resisted or defended himself, but, as Peter says, "he com- mitted himself to him that judgeth righteously." We see further, that our loving Saviour, though innocent, was attacked in a murderous man- ner by just such men as brother B. has mentioned in his letter. But the Saviour stood fast in the covenant of faithfulness, as the brother stated. In a murderous manner he was attacked, and Peter was quick and ready to draw his sword according to the legal justice of God, and 92 DOCTRINES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. struck a servant, and smote off his ear. But what says the Saviour? " Put up again thy sword into his place; for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword." Here indeed was the greatest necessity (for self-defense), but all this time the Saviour resisted not, but he suf- fered patiently, and even healed the one whose ear was smote off, acting as it is written : " The righteous shall live by faith," and again, " I be- lieve, therefore I speak, &c." Thus our Saviour had said before, " That ye resist not evil," for so he believed, and thus he spake, and thus he did. Farther says the loving Saviour : "He that believeth on me, as the Scripture has said, &c." Now we will consider a little what already at that time the Scripture was teaching about Christ and his kingdom ; so we see that the holy man of God, Isaiah, says of the time of Christ: " They shall beat their swords into plough shares, and their spears into pruning hooks ; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more" (Isa. 2 :4). Again says Isaiah (9 : 5, Ger. version) : "All war, with confused noise and garments rolled in blood, shall be burnt with fire. Sec." So we believe, where that fire which Christ came to kindle, where that fire burns, there will be burnt all war, as predicted ; for the love to God constrains to the obedience of his com- mandments, as John teaches, and as Christ requires and says, " If ye love me, keep my commandments 3" and his commandments aim through- out at non-resistance. So we hope the dear brethren will not take it amiss, when we from all these passages of Scripture, and especially from the words of Peter, can- not see or find any liberty to use any (carnal) sword, but only the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God, by which we cast down imagi- nations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bring into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ, as Paul (2 Cor. 10:5) says. But that the higher powers bear the sword of justice, punishing the evil and protecting the good, in thU we acknowledge them from the heart as the ministers of God. But the sword belongeth to the kingdom of the world, and Chi-ist says to his disciples : "I have chosen you from the world, &c." Thus we understand the beloved Peter, that we are to submit ourselves in all things that are not contrary to the will or command of God, and no further. And as to the swearinj of oaths, we believe the word of Christ, that in all things which we are to testify, we shall testify what is yea, or what is true, with yea, and what is nay, or not true, with nay; for whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil. And herewith we will conclude for this. This we intended to send you in writing with our dear brethren Daniel Leatherman, and Jacob Danner and Henry Danner. Written May 15th, 1785, at the big meeting on Big Conewago, from your brethren united in love, Jacob Saur, Valentine Pressel, Mich. Bosserman, Martin Roinhart, David Studebaker, Peter Dierdorff, Martin Urner, Jacob Stoll, Christian Longenecker, Henry Neff, Lorenz Beckner, Philip Lewig. DOCTMNES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. 93 Y. M. 1790. Unanimously concluded, that we desire and pray that the beloved brother Valentine P. would desist from his strange notion, because he has renounced with us before God, angels and men, all things that are contrary to the wholesome doctrine, and we believe and confess that Christ has forbidden to his followers the swearing of oaths and par- taking of war. Hence we must keep to his word and truth, and with- draw ourselves from every brother that returns again to swearing and war. It is impossible for us to break the bread of communion with such a brother who pretends the higher powers were requiring such of him. For they cannot compel us, if they w.)uld, because we are to obey God rather than men. But now, thanks to God, we have such a government, that will not require of us what is against our conscience. But should there be any among us having such a conscience as to be able to fight and to swear oaths, such a one would not be of us ; neither would we break the bread of communion with a minister that would baptize backward con- trary to our faith. Y. M. 1794. We hear that there arises a strange doctrine, or rather opinion, among the brethren in Carolina, and that some brethren arc grieved about this matter, because some believe, say and teach the fol- lowing, viz.: 1. That there is no other heaven but that in man. 2. That there is no other hell but that in man. 3. That God has no form or shape ; and if a person would worship God, and would conceive in his mind God as in a human form, would imagine or believe that God had an appearance like a man, such person would do the same as one who would warship a horse or any other beast. 4. That God had no anger, and would punish no person on account of his sins. 5. That the dead rise not; for out of the grave nothing would come forth. 6. That they will have nothing to do with the ban (or ezcommuni- cation.) For this cause some brethren des re to hear the views or minds of the brethren (in general council), and therefore we inform the loving breth- ren, that the view or doctrine of the old brethren is, that we are to be- lieve as the Scripture has said. For Christ says, " He that believeth on me, as the Scripture has said, out of his belly shall flow rivers of living water." John 7:38. Further he says, "The Scriptures cannot be broken." John 10:35. Again we see, that Christ in his whole life has looked upon the Scriptures, and has fulfilled it in all things. For when they came, and would take him, and Peter struck with the sword, the Lord said, " Put up again thy sword into his place, for all they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. Thinkest thou that I can- not now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels? But how then shall the Scripture be fulfilled, that thus it must be ?" Matt. 26: 50-54. 94 DOCTRINES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. Now, to come to the before mentioned points or propositions, our dear brethren will nut think hard of us because we believe, as it is written, and believe also with David, that the word of the Lord is well refined, and a true doctrine, and that we also believe with Paul, that it is our duty to bring into captivity every thought (all reason, says the German) to the obedience of Christ, &c. 1. Now, to come to the word about Jteaven. Says Moses, Gen. 1:1, " In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth; and the earth was without form, and void." Then no man was created yet, and Moses calls something heaven, that is not in man. And Acts 1:9. If we read, "And when he had spoken these things, while they beheld, he was taken up; and a cloud received him out of their sight. And while they looked steadfastly toward heaven as he went up, behold, two men stood by them in white aj/parel, which also said, Ye men of Galilee, why stand ye gazing up into heaven ? This same Jesus wh'ch is taken up from you into heaven, shail so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into heaven." Here we see that there is a heaven up on high. 2 " That there be no oth(>r hell but that in man." We read Luke 15 : 22, ff. about the rich man, that he died, and that he also was buried. Now it is without contradiction, that when he died his soul and spirit have departed from the body, and have found, it seems, according to the word, the hell in which he sufiered torments. So we think it would be well for us if we would on this point or word " 7je//" apply the doctrine of Paul, not to dispute about words. For we can notice in holy writ, that the word hell is used for different things. But we believe, as it is written, that there is a lake of fire or place of torment, in many places mentioned, which according to the word is outside of man, as we read plainly, Matt. 25:41, where Christ says, "Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels." Here we see clearly that the lake of fire is not in man, because men are sent into the lake of fire, and it says not that the fire should go into the men. 3. " That God has no shape or form, and if a person would worship God, and would conceive in his mind and believe God having a form like a man, such person would do the same as if he worshiped a horse or any other beast." This, it seems to us, is speaking very derogatory of God. or against God, though we believe also from the heart, that God is a Spirit, as Christ himself says, and that the true worshipers worship God in spirit and in truth. But not at all contrary to this says John, " In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.' And further on, "And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory," &c. Here God has put on a visible form. Now to be sure, in his worship man should not imagine a torm or likeness of God; but if it should happen, that a per- son or disciple would in his worship in simplicity and sincerity toward God look to God in the person or appearance of Christ, we consider it DOCTRINES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. 95 far less culpable than for a man to worship a horse or some other beast, and deem this a very unbecoming expression. 4. "That God hvs no anger, and punishes no person for his sins." Now we believe also with John, ' that God is love; and that he that dwelleth in love, dwelleth in God, and God in him;" and that God is not angry like an unconverted man, but that penal judgments proceed from love to the human family. Yet notwithstanding the Holy Scriptures or the men of God in holy writ call God's judgments God's wrath, as Psalm 90:11, "Who knoweth the power of thine anger? Even according to thy fear, so is thy wrath." Again, John the Baptist says, John 3 ; 36, " He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and he that believcth not the Son, shall not see life, but the wrath of God uhulelh on him." And that the Lord would punish no man for his sin, we deem to be an error. Christ says himself, "Suppose ye, that these Galileans were sinners above all the Galileans, because they suffered such things? I tell you. nay; but except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish " Luke 13:2, 3. 5. " That the dead rise not, for out of the grave nothing would come forth." We believe, as Christ says, John 5:28, "The hour is com- ing, in the which all that are in the graves shall hear his voice, and shall come forth," &c. So we read Matt. 27 : 51, 52, " The earth did quake, and the rocks rent, and the graves were opened, and many bodies of the saints which slept arose, a-id came out of the graves," &c. 6. Concerning the ban, see Avoidnnre. Y. M. 1798. It has been made known to us, that last fall at the great council meeting of the brethren in Virginia there was some discussion on account of the different views of the brethren, especially those in Carolina, where a brother minister, by name John H., has defended him- self in the name of his whole church before many brethren in public, and brought to light many of his own sentiments, in so far, th 't the brethren who still hold fast to the word of truth, according to their best knowledge, could not break the bread of communion with said John U.; would however in such serious circumstances not lightly make a full conclusion, without hearing first also the mind of their beloved old, and by many temptations, established brethren, hence this is to inform our dear brethren in North Carolina, that the ca.se has been presented to the brethren i/y those brethren who have seen John H. himself, and have heard from him many of his what can scarcely be called doctrines, but rather perverse apprehensions of holy writ, and have quite unanimously concluded, that we cannot hold said John H. and all who are of his mind, as brethren, as long as they do not acknowledge the doctrine of Jesus and nis apostles as a true doctrine, sent from God unto salvation, and publicly confess, according to which doctrine we are to prove all the spirits and powers operating in us, and necessarily must. For we be- lieve and confess with David, that the word of the Lord is a true doctrine 96 EOCTRINES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. and well refined ; therefore we cannot acknowledge such as our brethren any more, while they contradict the Holy Scriptures in luany points. This we the undersigned brethren confess and testify to hold them as other people out of the church, as long as they do not seek and keep house according to Scripture. Signed by the brethren. P. S. (Copy.) This is to certify that 1 heard John H. say in his preaching, that it would be no more sin to him to get upon the top of the barn, that he was in and preaching in, and swear and blaspheme all the new found oaths and curses, than to pray to God to forgive him his sins, or to bless him in any respect ; and he said, he had not served such a God that required the prayers of human creatures to forgive them their sins, or to bless them in any manner, these seven years, nor never would. Those are the words I heard, as near as I can remember. Per me, Samuel Van Etten, Johannes Keller. Y. M. 1800. Art. 1. (On account of the brethren in Carolina.) It has been made known to us that the brethren in Carolina desire to be informed more plainly concerning the conclusion made at the big meeting on Little Conewago, May 26, 1798, where it was concluded in union about brother John H., and all who are of his mind, that we could have no fellowship with him (and them) as long as they persisted in their erroneous doctrine, contrary to Holy Scripture. And since it is requested to inform them why and for what cause it was done, we should specify by name the caus- es, for which we can have no more fellowship with John H. and his sympathizers — this is to further inform them, that the chief causes were already mentioned in a letter from the big meeting held on Shenandoah, Virginia, October 20, 1794, as follows, viz.: that there arises a strange doctrine or rather opinion among the brethren in Carolina, and that other brethren are grieved by the same. (The six points are given above, Y. M. 1794.) These six chief points have been specified in the above mentioned letter of tl e big meeting with the answer, as the old brethren have given their views and doctrine in refutation, which letter, as we presume, has been sent to the brethren in Carolina, and they are all desired to read the same at pleasure. Then again at the big meeting which was held on Little Conewago, May 26, 1798, the same case was once more viewed by the old brethren, and also the Germantown breth- ren have sent their opinion by letter from br. Sander Mack, wherein it is sorrowfully lamented, that among the little flock of the Taufs-Gesinnte in America there should arise men who deny the resurrection of the dead, and that among brothers and sisters some had to have the misfortune to have their eyes smeared by that old, mouldy and horribly stinking leaven of the Sadducees. And in addition a written testimony has come to hand about John H., that he should have said in his preaching, which two truthful men have heard him say it, and have testified to it. (See postscript above.) DOCTRINES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. 97 Behold, much beloved brethren, in view of all the unscriptural doc- trines and expressions, we have been moved (compelled) to exclude from the fellowship and membership of the Lord Jesus at that big meeting of May 2G, said John H., and all that are in union with him in such views, and we confirm again that conclusion unanimously in our great meeting of the brethren to-day, renouncing all fellowship with each and all such persons as hold such doctrines and views, as are stated above, until they acknowledge their error and repent. Still we look upon this case with sadness and heartfelt grief, and wish them (grace) of God in Christ Jesus, whose mercy endureth forever, that they may earnestly reflect and consider what may make for their peace and everlasting s ilvation, while yet it is the accepted time, and the day of salvation. This we desire from the bottom of our hearts, that the good God through the tender mercy of Jesus Christ would give and bestow to them and us for his merciful love's sake. Amen. So much from us, the undersigned brethren, assembled with one accord, and delivered to the hands of our loving brethren, who also in words will make it known to you in the name of the whole fraternity. » Y. M. 181-5. See under the heading of ''Difficulties in Churches." Y. M. 1846. (Tennessee.) Art. 1. How would it be considered for any brother to declare in public that God did not foreknow all things, and that the plan of salvation was not laid before the fall of man ? Con- sidered, that no brother would preach that doctrine, in that it is dangerous and anti-gospel : " for known unto God are all his works from the be- ginning of the world." Acts 15 : 18. Art. 12. How is it considered, if a brother, in preaching, declare that our Saviour in speaking to Nicodemus (John 3 : 8), where he says, " the wind bloweth where it listeth, and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell whence it cometh or whither it goeth : so is every one that is born of the Spirit," means a spirit of delusion or error? Considered, that it is an erroneous view, and that it ought not to be preached, and that Christ undoubtedly had reference to the same Spirit spoken of in the preceding verses, and that the things of the Spirit are spiritually dis- cerned by those that are born of the Spirit. Y. M. 1847. Art. 6. How is it considered, if a brother preaches up the doctrine that Jesus Christ himself baptized, and contends so hard for it, that it has already caused a division in the church '! Considered, that the brethren present at this Y. M. unanimously believe that Jesus did not baptize, but his disciples, as recorded John 4:2; and they also ad- monish such a brother not to speak so any more, and if he should still persist in so doing, that he shall not do it in the name of the brethren. Art. 7. How is it considered, if a brother preach a sentiment on a part of Scripture, that would not be in accordance with the general views of the brethren, yet made good doctrine; whether it would be agreeable to the rules of the brethren to make it a question at the gene- 7 98 DOCTRINES, STRANGE AND ERRONEOUS. ral council meeting, and forbid him to preach it, or condemn him for it as erroneous, without first reasoning with him, or taking the counsel of the church wherein he lives ? Considered by the brethren present, that no accusation should be brought before the general council meeting against a brother in such a case, unless he first have had a hearing before his own church. Y. M. 1849. Art. 24. How is it considered, when a brother, who is a deacon of the church, holds and defends the views of the Romanists and other sects ? Considered, that such a brother should be visited by the brethren, and admonished; and if he still persist to hold and defend such views and practices, contrary to the view3 of the brethren, he could not be continued as a brother. y. M. 1853. Art. 15. How would the brethren hold a teacher that had preached, " there was no such a being as a devil, and that there was no serpent that beguiled Eve in the garden of Eden ; that it was only the lust that tempted her and every one but after being admon- ished, promised not to teach nor argue said doctrine, yet still harbors the same belief? Considered, that such a teacher was admonished right, that he should not preach such doctrine ; and if he should still persist in hold- ing such sentiments, the brethren could not hold him as a teacher or even as a member. He should be admonished to search the Scriptures, which are able to make him wise unto salvation. Y. M. 1858. Art. 37. How is it considered, when one brother preaches that there is no baptism of the Holy Ghost now, but that it is only the gift of the Holy Ghost which believers receive, while another brother prays for the Lord to baptize with the Holy Ghost? Ans. We think it best for no brother to preach that there is no baptism of tho Holy Ghost now, but in praying we should pray for the gift of the Holy Ghost. Y. M. 1859. Art. 3. How is it considered, if a minister would pub- licly teach that water baptism is not for the remission of sins, but that a person must have an evidence within that his sins are pardoned before he is a fit subject for baptism ; and also would difi"er with Wethren in the mode of electing brethren for the ministry; and likewise claim that all members, both male and female, have a right to admonish and exhort? Ans. Considered, that it is not according to Acts 2 : 38, and 22 : 16, to teach that a person must have an evidence within that his sins are pardoned before he is a fit subject for baptism, and that we know of no better way for the brethren to elect their ministers than that, which has been practiced heretofore. And concerning members ex- horting without being authorized by the church, we think they should not do so in the church in our public or general meetings, according to 1 Cor. 14:33-35. DUTIES, GENERAL, OF ALL MEMBERS. 99 DUTIES, GENERAL, OF ALL MEMBERS, whether official or raivATE. Inasmuch there is no minute of our yearly meetings extant, specify ing the duties of members generally, we copy the word of God. I. Matt. 22 :37, 38; Mark 13 : 29, 30, " The Jirst of all the command- ments is, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind, and with all thy strength." Luke 21 : 36, " Watch ye, therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man." Phil. 4 : G, " Be careful for nothing, but in every thing, by prayer and supplication, with thanksgiving, let your requests be made known unto God." 1 Thess. 5 ; 17, 18, Pray without ceasing. In everything give thanks." Eph. 5 : 20, " Giving thanks always for all things unto God aad the Father, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ." Matt. 4 : 10, "Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve." Matt. 6:6, " But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father who is in secret ; and thy Father who sees in secret will reward thee openly." Heb. 1ft: 25, "Not forsaking the tissembling of ourselves together, as is the custom of some, but exhort- ing, and so much the more as ye see the day approaching." Rev. 15 :4, "All nations shall come and worship before thee." IL Matt, 22:39, xMark 12:31, "And the sccovd is like unto it. Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" 1 Pet. 4:8, " Above all things, have fervent charity among yourselves." John 13:34,35, "A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another: by this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another." John 15:12, "This is my commandment, that ye love one another, as I loved you." Heb. 13:1, "Let brotherly love continue." 1 Pet. 1:21, "See that ye love one another from the heart fervently." 1 John 4 : 20, 21; Mark 9 : 50, " Be at peace with one another." 2 Cor. 13, 11, " Be of one mind, live in peace." 1 Thess. 5 : 13, James 5 :16i, " Pray one for another." Eph. 6 : 18, " Praying always, for all saints." 1 Thess. 4 : 18, " Comfort one another." 1 Thess. 5 : 11, " Edify one another." Heb. 3 : 13, " Exhort one another daily." Rom. 15:14, "^rfwonisA one another." Matt. 18 : 15, " If thy brother shall trespass against thee, go and tell him his fault.' Luke 17 :3, "If thy brother trespass against thee, rebuke him." Eph. 4:2, "Forbearing one another in love." Eph. 4:32, " Forgive one another." Heb. 13 : 16, " To do good, and to communicate, forget not." Matt. 5:44, "Love your enemies." Let this suffice as a very imper- fect sketch of Scripture precepts of duty. 100 ELECTIONEERING AND ELECTIONS. ELECTIONEERING AND ELECTIONS (POLITICAL). Y. M. 1813. Art. 2. Further, it has beea considered in union con- cerning electioneering, namely, giving votes for officers or men for the assembly or congress, in order to elect them to their several offices. Inasmuch as the appearance of the times into which we have come are grievous (it was the time of the war with England), and inasmuch as party spirit has risen so high in the kingdom of this world, that mcUj and even the heads of government, are among themselves at variance, therefore it has been viewed in union, that it would be much better if no votes were given in at elections for such officers (by the brethren): for so long as there is such division of parties, we make ourselves sus- picious and unpropitious on the one side, on whatever side we may vote. Thereby every one that desires to be defenseless (or non-resistant) may readily see what might be best (for him to do). Moreover, is (not only) our land and (but also) almost all empires engaged in war (in Europe especially); hence it was considered to be best to give in no vote, else we might perhaps assist in electing such that would afterward oppress us with war. To pray diligently for our government we believe to be our duty, and to call upoH the Lord we think will be most acceptable. Y. M. 1828. Art. 3 Whether brethren may go to the elections '( It is the opinion of most of the brethren that we should keep ourselves free (clear) of them. Y. M. 1835. (Miami.) Art. 7. Concerning going to elections and serving as jurymen. It was considered in both cases, that brethren should hold themselves loose as much as possible, or entirely, which is best. Particularly, no brother should take part in electioneering at an election, which is deemed very hurtful, and should not be among brethren, &c. Y. M. 1837. Art. 7. How is it considered, if members go to the public election and vote, or even previously electioneer for the candidates of office ? It is the advice of the old brethren to keep ourselves also in this respect as free as possible, and rather not go to the election ; and as regards electioneering, it is tl*e sense of the brethren, that according to the word no brother ought to interfere (or entangle himself) so far with the offices and government of this world. Y. M. 1839. Art. 5. Whether a brother may give his house for holding a (political) election in it? The answer was. No; it should not be. Y. M. 1849. Art. 33. Is it safe and proper for the humble fol- lowers of Jesus to go to the elections, and take an active part in the po- litical affairs of the country "/ Considered, as it was always the advice of the older brethren, and as the anointing (1 John 2 : 27) will teach every sincere follower of Jesus, that it would be safest in regard to political elections to remain .is neutral as pcssible, and rather than go EMANCIPATION OF SLAVES. 101 to the election, to commit the matter in prayer to the care of Him who sotteth up and removeth rulers. Y. M. 1853. Art. 17. Concerning going to political meetings and elections. Considered best not to attend any such at all, inasmuch the true Christian belongs to another kingdom. Y. M. 1863. Art. 18. Inasmuch as some brethren manifest a desire to prohibit brethren from voting at our common political elections, do not the brethren in yearly council see it the best to make no change dif- fering from the counsel and practice of our ancient brethren in these days of trouble ? In the present crisis we recommend that brethren abstain as much as possible from attending elections, according to John 18 : 36 2 Cor. 6 : 14-17. Y. M. 1864. Art. 1. In no less than four papers the question is presented, whether it is right and proper for a brother to go to or tase part in political elections, it being specially stated that it had caused hard feelings and disunion ? Ans. We have been led to think that at all times it would be best and most consistent with our profession, and specially most proper and safe in the present critical state of things, to have nothing at all to do with politics, 'and entirely to abstain from voting. See 2 Cor. 6 : 14-17 ; also 31in. of A. M. 1 863, Art. 18. ELECTIONS FOR OFFICERS IN CHURCH. See " Clioice." EMANCIPATION OF SLAVES. Y. M. 1782. Concerning the unchristian negro slave trade, it has been unanimously considered, that it cannot be permitted in any wise by the church, that a member should or could purchase negroes, or keep them as slaves. But concerning brother John Van L. who had bought a considerable time since a negro wench, and the same has given birth already during that time to four children by fornication, it is the united and cordial counsel of the brethren, that the said brother L. shall let the old negro wench go free from this time on, and shall tell her that she is free. But if she will not leave him, after he has given her liberty, then he may enter with her into a contract for her wages. But this setting free or emancipation shall be done before some brethren as witnesses of the transaction. Concerning the children, it is also unitedly considered, that he is to give the children free at the age of twenty-one year.", and is to have them schooled and provided with (food,) raiment and bedding during the time, as it is just and proper ; and when they are twenty one years old, he is to give them a free (new) dress. Still it is our cordial desire and counsel, that if the old negro wench would not like to go away, he (who was her master) should use all diligence to prevent such unchaste life, and lay it before her earnestly, and if she would be free, to give her her free papers, &c. Y. M. 1797. (Virginia.) It was considered good and also concluded 102 EMANCIPATION OF SLAVES. unanimously, that no brother or sister should have negroes as slaves, and in case a brother or sister had such, he (or she) has to set them free. And in case a person is drawn by the grace of God, who has negroes, and desires to be received into the church, then it is to be laid before him (or her) before being received by baptism into the church, that it is th? brotherly and united counsel, that brethren and members hav- ing negroes for slaves, and thinking that they could not at once emanci- pate them, may hold them so long as the nearest church may deem that they had earned the money, and then according to the counsel of the chuTch to let their slaves go out free with a good suit of wearing apparel (frei kleid) as is given to a white serve. And if they (the slaves) have children, they shall stay with the brother as servants, until they are twenty-five years old; he is to have them taught reading and writing, and bring them up in the fear of the Lord, and when they enter upon their (26) twenty-sixth year, to let them go out free with a good suit of clothing (frei kleid). Further it is considered, if a brother, contrary to this conclusion, would purchase negroes, and would not emancipate them, he would have to be considered as disobedient, and we could have no fellowship with him until he sets them free. Y. M. 1812. Art. 5. Concerning the slave trade and slaveholding, it was considered, that it is a most grievous evil, and should be abolished as soon as possible. Y. M. 181o. Art. 1. With regard to the slave trade and slavehold- ing, it was unanimously considered, that it is wrong, and that it belongs to the iniquities of Babylon, making merchandise of souls of men (Rev. 18 : 13), and that it is carried on by the spirit of this world, and is con- trary to the good and holy Spirit of God, by whom all the faithful souls, dedicated to God, are ruled, and led into all truth, and are to come out according to the counsel of God, of Babylon, not touching the unclean thing, that they be not partakerr. of her sins, and receive not of her plagues. Hence it is unanimously and in union considered, that no member, neither brother nor sister, shall purchase or sill negroes, and keep none for slaves; members should also with all diligence restrain their children from it, as far as it is possible, while they are yet out of the church. Further it was concluded, if there were members having slaves, or per- sons who wish to be received into the church, and have slaves, that they might hold them in a proper way so long as the church near which they live may deem it necessary for the slaves to earn the money they had cost, and then, with the counsel of the church, they are to be set free, with a good suit of clothing; and if there are any who have not bought, but inherited their nagroes, they are to be liberated as soon as the church consider it right and proper. And if members have negro children under their care, or even as slaves, they shall bring them up in an orderly manner, teach them also to read, and keep them, if males, to the age of twenty-one years, and if females, to the age of eighteen years, and EMANCIPATION OF SLAVES. 103 • then, with the counsel of the church, emancipate them, with a good suit of wearing apparel. Further it has been unanimously concluded, that if members having negro slaves, will not set them free, and thus oppose themselves to the order of God and the loving counsel of the old breth- ren, who are indeed servants and stewards of God, and even the united counsel of the whole yearly meeting, then after sufficient admonition they would have to be held bound (according to the word). We would have to deny such members the breaking of the bread of com- munion, the holy kiss and the brotherly counsel, yet according to the word of the apostle Paul to admonish them as brethren or sisters. Y. M. 1837. Art. 10. How is it considered, if a brother buys and keeps slaves, and also sells them again? Considered, that it could in no wise be justified in a brother according to the gospel. Y. M. 1853. Art. 9. Concerning slavery. How shall any branch of the church proceed in case an individual wishes to become a membeY who is in possession of a slave or slaves, and the law of the State in which they reside is such, that they cannot manumit them in safety without transporting them beyond its (the State's) limits, and as we are aware that the several States where slavery does not exist are contem- plating and passing strenuous laws prohibiting their emigration thither, &c.? ' It seems indispensably necessary for us to adopt some other plan than hitherto practiced, in order that the church should be kept clear from the evils of slavery, and' that such persons may be enabled to come into Christ's kingdom. The questions involved were con.sidered too im- portant to be decided upon at once, and therefore (it was) concluded, to intrust this matter to a committee to report thereon as soon as possible. The committee to consist of the following brethren : Joseph Arnold and B. Moomaw, of Va.; John H. Umstad, Sam. Lehman, Isaac Price and David Bosserman, of Pa., and D. P. Sayler and Henry Koontz, of Md. Art. 14. How is it considered for a man who is a brother to purchase a man or woman upon condition that such slave shall be free or emancipated after serving the purchaser a certain number of years, agreed upon by the slave and his purchaser without consulting the church? Considered, that no brother should do so without the counsel of the church, and we believe the better way would be to have nothing at all to do with slavery in any shape or form whatever. Y. M. 185-1. Art. 1. Report of the committee appointed last year on the subject of slavery (see Min. 1853, Art. 9). The question having been, How shall any branch of the church, &c.? (see above). Agreeably to the ninth query of Y. M. 1853, concerning slavery, the committee ap- pointed to report on the same have had this subject under serious con- sideration in the fear of the Lord, and do report as follows : First. Under no circumstances can slavery be admitted into the church. Secondly. In all cases, where a holder of a slave or slaves wishes to become a member in the church, he be required to manumit all his slaves 104 EXCLUDING MEMBERS. • before baptism, upon tbe following conditions : the males to go out free at the age of twenty-one years, and the females at the age of eighteen years. All those over and above these ages when manumitted, are to be paid by their former owner such a sum, cither in money or goods, as may be judged right by the church in which the case may occur, and which is considered as the best judge, being acquainted with all the circum- stances, as a compensation lor their services over age. This will enable the manumitted to emigrate to a land of liberty, and will relieve the con- science of the liberator from the burden of taking with him to the bar of God the wages of oppression. This report was adopted after a lengthy discussion by the meeting. Y. M. 1857. Art. 6. As the subject of slavery has often been before the annual meeting, and as it has always been considered that no brother can, according to the gospel, hold a fellow-creature in bondage, to which we say, Amen — what then is to be done with brethren who do not ob- serve the advice given by the yearly meeting in this or any other respect? Aus. That such churches or members should be visited, and if not wil- ling to liberate their slaves, they shall be dealt witli according to the gospel manner of dealing with all gross transgressions. Y. M. 1862. Art. 15. How is it considered, if a minister defends and justifies slavery, even in a public debate? Ans. It is utterly wrong for any brother to do so, according to Matt. 7:12. Y. M. 1863. Art. 5. What should be done with a brother who would preach that slavery was right according to the Scriptures, and cause dis- cord among the brethren? Inasmuch as the brethren always believed, and believe yet, that slavery is a great evil, and contrary to the doctrine of Christ, we consider it utterly wrong for a brother to justify slavery either in public or private, and that he should be admonished, and if obstinate shall be dealt with according to Matt. 18. ERRONEOUS DOCTRINES. See above, ''Doctrine^., strange," dec. EXCLUDING MEMBERS. Y. M. 1848. (Indiana.) Art. 3. How is it considered, when a part, say a minority of a church, disowns the other part, or a majority of the members, without taking a legal or scriptural course, and without giving a legal notice to the body of the church, and not showing or informing the disowned members wherein they transgressed ? The difficulties in this case occupied the greater part of Monday and Tuesday, and lastly were postponed for decision until Wednesday morning. See Art. 12. Art. 12. In regard to the third query or the difficulties of Bat'chelor's Run church with brn. Oyman and Patton and others, the brethren in general council considered, that there had been committed errors on both sides, in consequence of which many members on both sides made satisfactory acknowledgments before the meeting, and it was concluded, that with EXCLUDING MEMBERS. 105 such all that is past should be forgiven and forgotten, and with as many as may yet come and make satisfaction, and that they all should be re- ceived into full fellowship, and brother David Fisher in his office as speaker. Furthermore, this meeting considers and counsels, that brn. Oyman and Patton, and such others that hold yet with them, should have still time to reflect, and should they come also in a reasonable space of time, and make satisfactory acknowledgment, the church should also be willing to forgive them. But if they should persist in their contrary course, going on in holding meetings in opposition to the church, and even become railers of the church, there would be no other way than to put them into full avoidance, according to 1 Cor. 5 : 11. Y. M. 1852. Art, 17. How are churches to proceed in the fojlowing case? A brother being cut off from the church with an excluded party, and afterward becomes guilty of adultery. Considered, to hold him as the church does such party. See 1 Cor. 5; 13, "But them that are without, God judgeth." — Art. 19. How is it considered, if a brother is legally expeHed from the church, and afterward is taken sick, when he calls for the brethren and requests of them to be anointed, and the breth- ren do anoint him, knowing that he is excluded from the church ? Con- sidered, that according to gospel we have no right to anoint such as are not in fellowship with the church. The word (James 5 : 13, ff.) goes only to the faithful. Y. M. 1859. Art. 29. Can a minister who is not ordained, with the counsel of the church, expel a member, or must there be an ordrfined elder present? Ans. It is hot necessary for an ordained elder to be present, if the member to be expelled is a private member. y. M. 1862. Art. 40. Has a church a right to exclude a member before informing him of the charge they have against him ; and if not, what course should a member pursue, that has been disowned that way ? Ans. The church has no right to do so without duly notifying him, and if they do so, he is entitled to a rehearing, with the assistance of elders from other churches. — Art. 45. Is it in accordance with the gospel for the standing committee of the yearly meeting to send a committee into a church, if desired by such that are expelled from the church according to Matt. 18, the church having no knowledge of it? Ans. No; but the church which has expelled him should call a committee, if the expelled member requests it. — Art. 4t). Is it according to the word of God, for such persons as are excommunicated from the church council, the salu- tation, and the communion, according to Matt. 18, to come before the committee, and can their complaints against members be received as evi- dence? Ans. No. — Art. 47. How is it considered, when two members of the church, a visiting brother and his wife, see another visiting broth- er intoxicated j afterward these two brothers visit the church and com- mune together, and some two mouths afterward, the first brother named and a private brother saw the same brother again, as they thought, with 106 EXECUTORSHIP— FAR WEST BRETHREN. too much liquor. Still there is no complaint made to the church until some six or seven months after the first transgression, though there have been two or three church meetings held in the time. Then the first brother named lays in a complaint. What is now the duty of the church in this and like cases? Ans. We consider both parties are in fault, and they should be dealt with according to (the word). Matt. 18. — Art. 49. Should the hand be withheld or ofi"ered as connected with the admoni- tion, in admonishing a brother? Ans. We consider that the right hand of friendship may be offered, supposing it to be included in the admoni. tion. (The question is no(; very explicit, but was answered probably under the supposition that the question was referring to an excommuni- cated member.) — Art. 56. Is the testimony of one witness sufficient au- thority to expel a member under any circumstances, when the accused denies and objects to the testimony? Ans. One witness is not sufficient in general, but we will not say that under no circumstances one is not sufficient. EXCOMMUNICATION. See " Avoidance," &c. EXECUTORSHIP. Y. M. 1S21. Art. 2. Whether an ordained or private brother may serve as executor, where he knows beforehand that the law must be en- forced, has been likewise considered, that it should not be according to the gospel doctrine. But inasmuch as many brethren are in such a position, the counsel is, to have patience with them, until they can get through with it, yet so as not to break the bread of communion with them. Since, however, an executorship is very difficult for brethren, it was deemed necessary to adopt measures to obviate or lessen the difficul- ties. And inasmuch as every parent (or other person of sound mind) has a right to make a will according'to his own pleasure without being inter- fered with by the authorities, to divide and distribute his property, and also to select his executors, and to order them what they are to do, and how to do it (the testator may insert in his will the following clause), namely: " I nominate and appoint A. B. to be sole executor of my estate, to settle, pay ofl" and collect, ice, as far as the rules of our church and the gospel will admit of," &c. Y. M. 1834. Art. 8. How is it considered, if a brother, being a min- ister, is, as executor of an estate, obliged to put the law in force? Con- sidered, he should do nothing without the counsel of the church. FAR WEST BRETHREN. Y. M. 1850. Art. 25. There is a body of people or brethren in the far West, whose doctrine and practice is somewhat difTerent from ours. Some of our brethren live near or almost among them. Now the ques- tion arises, are the brethren privileged, according to the gospel, to hold FAR WEST BRETHREN. 107 communion with tlicm under existing circumstances? Considered, that according to the gospel and the constant practice of the church, it would not be advisable for brethren to commune with them until a union is effected, and they are agreed to practice according to the ancient order of the church, 1 Cor. 4:17. Y. M. 1852. Art. 1. Proceedings of a council meeting, held Nov. 22, 1851, in Adams county, Illinois, by the brethren known as the West- ern brethren, with propositions for a re-union with the body of our broth- erhood, represented in this meeting. After the differences having been stated, and considerable conversation had on the subject, it was finally concluded, that this meeting does not feel satisfied, how a full and true union can be obtained on the propositions made by the Western brethren, and that therefore th's matter should be postponed until the dear brethren in the West become better acquainted with the grounds of our practice, and meanwhile we should exercise charity and Christian love toward them. — Art. 2. A letter from Jefferson county, Iowa, referring to the differences existing between the brethren called the Western brethren, and those of our brethren settled around and ajiiong them from the East, and wishing to be guided in their intercourse with them by the council of this meeting. Considered, and answered by the foregoing decision. Y. M. 1855. Art 29. Request for a committee to (go to) Illinois to confer with the Far Western brethren or a committee of them, to investi- gate the differences in doctrine and practice existing between them and us, and report to next annual meeting. Granted, and brother A. Mass, Christian Long, John Metzger, Samuel Lehman, James H. Tracey, David Hardman, John Bowman, Daniel Fry, D. P. Sayler, John H. Umstad and James Quinter, appointed for this business. Y. M. 185G. Art. 14. The committee appointed last annual meeting to visit and confer with the Far Western brethren or a committee of them, to investigate the differences in doctrine and practice existing between them and us, submitted the following REPORT. May 8, 1856. We, the brethren who constitute the committee appoint- ed by the German Baptist church at our last annual meeting to visit the Western brethren (who recognize brother Wolfe, of Illinois, as their bish- op), by the grace and favor of God, were permitted to meet at their meeting house, where we were received on the most friendly and Christianlike terms, and after different queries were proposed for our deliberation, the three (or four) following being considered the most important, we pro- ceeded to make our report accordingly as follows. 1. The question concerning the reality of a devil (which seeras to have been doubted by some of them) was considered, and after comparing opinions and sentiments on the subject of the reality of such a being and 108 FAR WEST BRETHREN. his nature, we agreed upon the following view, that the Scriptures recog- nize a devil or an evil spirit, that manifests itself in the flesh. 2. On the doctrine of universal salvation, which denies punishment hereafter (a doctrine which never obtained foothold in our brotherhood, and while a good many of our ancient faithful brethren may have held the doctrine of restoration, and many of our dearly beloved brethren may still hold it, the preaching of such doctrine was, as far as our infor- mation extends, never countenanced in our church), we cordially agreed with brother Wolfe, " that all men shall receive hereafter according to the deeih done in the hodjj, whether they he good or had."* 3. On the subject of feet-washing, brother Wolfe is firm in the opinion that one person should both wash and wipe the feet of a number of breth- ren (or among the female part of the congregation, one sister the feet of several sisters), and then another, and so on, until all are washed; but he is willing to conform to the practice of the brethren in general when in communion meeting with them, and begs for forbearance on the part of the brethren in general until they shall all come to see alike. 4. Brother Wolfe is likewise strongly of the opinion, that no time should be spent between the eating of the supper and the breaking of the bread in the communion, but that the whole ceremony should , be prosecuted without intermission or delay. It is the sincere desire of brother Wolfe, that however these sentiments may clash with the general practice of the brethren, they may not be considered a sufficient cause why they should not be received in com- munion and fellowship with the brethren, with which views we, the com- mittee, unanimously agree, and present this our report to the brethren in general council met, for their deliberation and concurrence. Signed by David Hardman, J. H. Umstad, J. H. Tracey, A. Mass., John Metzger, S. Lehman, C. Long. (Thus it was entered upon the minutes without note or comment.) Y. M. 1859. Art. 3.5. Several communications were sent to this an- nual meeting from the brethren hitherto distinguished as Western breth- ren. From these communications we shall give some extracts, as we have not room upon the minutes to give them entire. * It is somewhat singular, that this report is so worded, that by it the fact cannot be ascertained on which side the erior has been entertained, and which party stood up for the truth, as the Scriptures say. Indeed it would appear rather by the statement above, as if our committee had been in favor of Universal- ism (on the shady side of the truth), and finally had to agree with brother Wolfe in the express declaration of inspired light and truth. Now out of love to the truth, and to the church that has always professed to abide by the sure word of truth, and out of love to the breibren forming that cemuiittee, who would cer- tainly not wish to leave their report to posterity open to misapprehension, also 1,0 less out of love to those Western brethren who have so nobly come forward to promote the cause of union among us, we must merely state, that the impres- sion among our brethren, of the Western brethren holding and preaching Uni- versalist doctrine and denying future punishment, was one of the causes that their re-uniou with us was somewhat retarded. FASHIONABLE GARMENTS. 109 " Beloved brethren : We, the brethren in Adams county, Illinois, met together in council, to take into consideration the course we had best adopt in respect to the yearly meeting. On account of the great dis- tance we are from the place of meeting, and none of us being in a situa- tion suitable to take up such a journey, we have concluded to send you these lines, to inform you that after we received the minutes of last con- ference, held in Indiana, we called a church council, and we concluded for the sake of union in the brotherhood to adopt the minutes of the last Y. M., and we intend to carry them out as near as circumstances will ad- mit of. . . . We further state, that we are willing to counsel and be counseled by the Y. M." Signed by elder George Wolfe and others, by order of the church. The following extract is from a letter from Sugar Creek church, San- gamon county, 111.: " We have unanimously agreed to be fully united with our beloved elder brethren, to counsel and be counseled. And wc have put in practice the order of receiving and baptizing members, non- swearing, and non-conformity to the world," Signed by elder Isham Gibson and others, by order of the church. From the brethren in Hurricane Creek district. Bond county. 111,: " Dear brethren in the Lord : Considering your love and care for us as manifested by your kind forbearance and long-suffering to usward, we in love to you and all saints, thought it good to send to you this epistle, and also brother Daniel B. Sturgis, delegate from this district, witness- ing that we desire full fellowship and union. And we unanimously agree to be counseled by the brethren, and submit to all the decisions of our beloved brethren in conference. We believe the best good of all is maintained by a full subjection to the decisions of the yearly meetings published in the minutes." Signed by Daniel B. Sturgis and others, by order of the church. The following is the expression of this annual meeting upon the sub- ject referred to in the above communications : " Whereas, it is known that what have been called the Western breth- ren have not heretofore been in perfect union with our churches in ob- serving the ordinances and regulations in the house of God; and, where- as, a number of communications have come before this .council meeting from said brethren, expressing a strong desfre to be in full fellowship with our brotherh'ood, and promising to submit to and to be governed by the rules by which we think the house of God should be governed, therefore, considered, that we have cause to thank God that the efforts made to bring about a union have been so successful, and we are now happy to recognize them as being in full fellowship with us." FASHIONABLE GARMENTS, &c. Y. M. 1804. Art. 8. Concerning the evil which grieves God and angels in heaven, and also the faithful souls on earth, namely, the new fashions which are in vogue in the world, and also here and there are 110 FASHIONABLE GARMENTS. believers who gratify too much the lust of the eye (Num. 15:39), and confoi-ming therein themselves to the world, and especially our youth is corrupting itself herein so much, that the Lord has almost cause to com- plain, that all flesh has corrupted its way; therefore it has been unani- mously deemed good, that the bishops and ministers, as also all fathers and mothers of families, should use all diligence to counteract such things, that they might spread no farther, but rather be put out of the way; especially when persons desire to be received (in the church), it should be laid before them, that such things are contrary to the whole- some doctrine, and that it is their duty to deny themselves, and when they are willing to lay them aside, then they may be baptized in hope, that they will permit themselves further instructed, &c. * Y. M. 1822. Art. 6. How is it considered, when members will not receive the loving counsel of the brethren on account of high fashions of the world, which had been considered for the third time in the big meet- ing, that if a member had been admonished in love once and again (with- out effect), we could not break bread with them. But now at this meet- ing it was considered, that if they would not accept the loving counsel, we could not have full fellowship with such members according to the gospel. Also such who permit or approve the high fashions in their chil- dren, who are still under their control, especially housekeepers in the church, who should be examples of the flock (could not be fellowshipped in this). Y. M. 1834. Art. 11. Concerning high fashions and conformity to the world. Considered, a great evil in many respects. Y. M. 1840. Art. 7. About the more and more increasing evil, that members conform so much to the world in building, house-furniture, raiment, &c., and even to have a string of bells upon their horses at sleighing. Considered, that all the brethren and members, and especially teachers (ministers), ought to oppose and labor against this growing evil, and to avoid the tinkling of bells as improper for brethren. Y. M. 1846. Art. 10. About pride in its various forms, which is creeping into the church, it is thought highly necessary that the yearly meeting instruct and urge it upon all the overseers of the churches, to see especially to that matter, and protest strongly against all manner of superfluity and vanity, suot as building fine houses, and having paintings, carpetings and costly furniture, &c., together with the adorning, of the body too much after the fashion of the world. We believe that we should deny ourselves and abstain from these things, especially the laborers in the word, who are called to be examples of the flock. Y. M. 1847. Art. 9. How is it considered, if a brother or a sister should have two suits of clothes, one of them plain to go to meeting in, and one after the fashions of the world to go to other gatherings in ? Considered by the brethren present, that it is very unbecoming for mem- bers to do so, and that it would be the duty of the teachers faithfully to FASHIONABLE GARMENTS. Ill admonish such brethren and sisters, again and again, if necessary, not to conform to the world in their dress and habits, as the apostles also have warned us. See Rom. 12:1,2; 1 Tim. 2 : 9 ; 1 Pet. 3 : 3, 4. Y. M. 1849. Art. 3. Can it be allowed for brethren to wear fur or cloth caps, and sisters to wear trimmed straw or leghorn bonnets? Con- sidered to be inconsistent with the word of God, and therefore it ought not to be. Y. M. 1858. Art. 6. How are we to proceed with members that come to our love-feasts from other congregations, and who when they leave home are dressed after the gay fashions of the world, and during the day change their dress several times, and put on in the evening a plainer dress to go to the communion table ? Is it enough simply to admonish such members, or should the church in which they live be informed ? And must we in- deed commune with such members, when some of the members in the church are much grieved by their conduct ? Considered, that it is wrong for mem- bers to do so, but they should not be debarred from the privilege of com- muning until the brethren of the district in which they live have been in- formed, and until they have been reproved, and afterward continue diso- bedient. (A new question might arise from the above questions, which should be deeply considered according to the word of God, namely : Can faithful and earnest members, who are grieved^it such frivolous conduct as stated in the first question, having seen and noticed it during the day and before the communion, sit down in the evening at the Lord's table, and at the time of self-examination see such members at the same table; can those faithful members then say to themselves, that they have done their duty toward these failing members, without having given them a note of warn- ing? Perhaps you think they are in danger of eating and drinking of the sacred emblems of a Saviour's dying love unworthily, and still you do nothing to prevent it.) Y, M. 1861. Art. 3. Inasmuch as the brethren have decided in con- ference, that members who would not conform to the order in dress as generally practiced by the oM brethren and sisters, that they could not have the privilege to the communion; but as this does not restrain them into the order, we wish to know whether the church has the right to deal with them as ofi"enders, when they will not conform in dress or to wearing caps, and leave off wearing hoops ? Considered, that such members should be admonished, and that warmly too, to lay aside all superfluities, and conform to the order of the church; otherwise they must and will be regarded as disobedient members. See Rom. 12. Y. M. 1862. Art. 34. Can this annual meeting allow brethren, and especially the bishops and ministering brethren, to suffer their children while under their control, to follow all the foolish fashions of this world, such aS wearing of hoops, and unnecessary ornaments of the body ? Ans. We consider such things should not be tolerated by the brethren where they cau reasonably be prevented. 112 FASHIONALLE GARMENTS. Y. M. 1863. Art. 3. How are we to deal with sisters wearing hoops ? They should he admonished once and again, and if they will not heed the admonition, they should be dealt with according to Matt. 18. See Min. 1861, Art. 3. Y. M. 1864. Art. 7. When the apostles prohibit the wearing of gold and pearls, 1 Tim. 2:9,1 Pet. 3 : 3, are gold watches to be included ? Ans. As the carrying of gold watches may, and is likely to lead to pride, we think it advisable not to wear them. — Art. 8. How is it considered by the brethren in yearly council assembled, in relation to the members who do not conform to the order of the brethren in the wearing of apparel, and in the wearing of their hair, but follow the fashions of the world ? Ans. We think that the ministering brethren should heartily admonish, and urge the members to conform to the order of the brethren, and set them a good example, and if those who are admonished again and again, and that by the church too as well as by the ministers, will not hear, the word of God directs us what to do with them. Matt. ch. 18th. — Art. 10. Is it considered right according to the gospel for a minister to wear a soldier's overcoat when in the pulpit, or at other times ; and if it is not, how is such a brother to be dealt with, if he should continue to wear it after being admonished ? Ans. It is considered not advisable for any brother, whether a ministei^r private member, to wear any military cloth- ing; and if he is admonished, and still persists in being disobedient, he should be dealt with according to the 18th chapter of Matthew. Y. M. 1866. Art. 27. Inasmuch as pride and an inclination to fol- low the fashions of the world are stiil increasing among us, in wearing fine apparel, frock and sack coats, dusters, shawls, &c., with the hair parted off to one side, or shingled and roached, mustaches, &c., the sisters also wearing fine apparel, going without caps, wearing hoops, hats, veils, overcoats, jewelry, &c., and as admonition in some cases has not effected anything, cannot this yearly meeting propose some plan by which this growing evil may be arrested ? Ans. We think members of the church conforming to the fashions of the world as above stated, should be ad- mon^hed again and again, and if they will not hear the church, the Saviour has given directions in Matt. 18, how to deal with them — Art. 47. The following resolution was proposed to the annual meeting by a district meeting, with a request that it be adopted : Eesolved by this annual meeting, that the churches throughout the brotherhood enforce plainness of dress, and a plain manner of wearing the hair and beard, upon the preachers and officers of the churches. By plain- ness of dress we mean the common order of giving shape to dress as practiced by the old brethren and sisters generally, and by plain- ness of hair we mean the hair parted on the top of the head, or all combed back in a plain manner, or combed straight down all around the lead, and not having the hair and beard trimmed according to the custom of the world. Con.sidered, that the annual meeting unanimously FAST DAYS— FEET WASHING. 113 adopt this resolution, according to Rom 12:2; 1 Pet. 1:14, 1 John 2 : 15 IG; and that all preachers and officers that follow the fashions of the woild in the foregoing particulars, violate the order of the gospel by doing so. and render themselves liable to be brought under the council of the church. FAST DAYS. Y. M. 1850. Art. 42. Is it consistent with the gospel for the breth- ren to recommend to the churches a day of fasting to be observed annu- ally, and to have it published in the minutes of the annual meeting/ Considered, inasmuch as the gospel teaches us to fast and pray, to always pray, and never faint ; and the great Teacher says a certain species of evil spirits cannot be cast out but by fasting and prayer; we hope that every Christian shepherd will teach his flock to pray and fast often- cr than once a year, as we do not know the time when he that goeth about as a roaring lion may tempt or deceive us. (The gospel does not appoint special times for meeting; but if we would not set a certain time, day and hour for meeting, how could the children of God meet at all ? So if the perilous times into which we have come seem to require that al' the children of God everwhere should unite in prayer and fasting, how could it be done with one accord and at the same time, unless the time is appointed and made known beforehand ? Should the example of the king and people of Nineveh, and its gracious answer by God, have been in vain recorded for our learning ? See Jonah 3 : G-lU.) Y. M. 1853. Art. 20. Whether brethren should observe days of list- ing appointed by the President of the United States, or by the Govern- ors of the respective States in which we live ? Considered, that brethren should pray always and not faiut, and also to fast as often as practicable. But considering Ilom. 13 : 1-7, and also 14 : 5, 6, it shall be left optional with the churches and members to observe such days or not, as they are " fully persuaded in their own minds." (When the Lord said by the prophet to his people Israel, " Seek the peace of the city whither I have cau.^ed you to be carried away captives, and pray unto the Lord ior it : for in the peace thereof shall ye have peace," Jer. 29 : 7, it would certainly be no offense to God now to unite with the people generally in fasting and pra_,er for our country.) FEASTING AT FUNERALS. See "Funerals." FEET-WASHING. Y. M. 1812. Art. 2. Concerning _/l•e^wos7t be baptized, then that brother, with the counsel of the church, is fy the candidate and forward him. With these lines we have ♦,hing new, but adhere to the conclusion which has been laid HYMN BOOK— IN ARES. 119 down already six years ago by the beloved old brethren. We have fur- ther to notice, that there were very rude expressions made by brother L., saying that there is gone forth a spirit of Satan, and rules in the church, and of this J. Z. is the head, &c., and even the church has been compared to the rebellious company of Korah. Such should be acknowledged and recalled by all means. HYMN BOOK. Y. M. 1849. Art. 38. Whether our hymn book now in use could not be improved by a better selection ? Considered, that the hymn book we have answers our purpose very well. Y. M. 1858. Art. 23. What does the annual meeting think of taking the preparatory steps for producing a new hymn book ? Referred to next annual meeting. Y. M. 1860. Art. 9. We the brethren assembled in general district council at the Valley meetinghouse in Botecourt Co., Va., desire that the brethren in the annual council meeting of 1860 devise some plan or way to remodel, or enlarge by appendix, our hymn book, so as to satisfy the wants of the brethren. Ans. To comply M'ith the above request, this annual meeting appoints a committee of five to make a new hymn book, with the understanding that as many of the hymns in the present book as possible be retained. The following brethren constitute the commit- tee : James Quinter, 0.,' Samuel Garber, 111., John Mezger, Md., John H. Umstad, Pa., John Kline, Va. Y. M. 1861. Art. 14. That we are in favor of postponing the revision of our hymn book. Considered, since a committee was appointed by last yearly meeting to attend to this business, and circumstances preventing their action, we are in favor of extending the same committee to consum- mate the work assigned them at their earliest convenience. INFARES. Y. M. 1827. Art. 11. Whether we may be allowed to hold infares? Considered, that it (such things) belongs to pride, extravagance and van- ity, and should not be among members. INSTALLATION OF MINISTERS. See also " Choice and Installa- tion," &c. Y. M. 1846. Art. 9. (Pennsylvania.) Is a brother, that was a speak- er or deacon, and has moved into another church, properly re-installed in his office, if an ordained brother takes the counsel of the church, and announces the same to him, without he being received by the members with hand and kiss '{ Considered unanimously by the elders, that inas- much as he was properly received into his office by the church in which he was chosen, he would be sufficiently established. 120 INTEREST FOR MONEY TAKING. INTEREST FOR MONEY T \KING. Y. M. 178'^ Art. 2. Concerning takino; interest, it is considered, that no member shuuld take interest for his money, inasmuch in the law of G"d it was expressly f"rbidden, and Christ says that the Scripture can- not be broken (John 10:85); ?nd inasmuch the dear and chosen ves- sel and faithful apostle Paul says, that Christ became the end of the law, and yet the wrd of God and also divine knowledge teaches, that in or" der to become partakers of Christ it is required to deny ourselves entirely of all thi se things which are contrary to the word and command of God : therefore, we exhort a