'.'■*; -*■' ■ "' JLAST DISCOURSES 0/ OUR LORD IVesidiiigs for every Day of Lent ■n " Dt. a. G. MORTIMER. • {^ LIBRARY OF THE THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY PRINCETON. N. J. PRESENTED BY The Estate of Rev. Robert Williams Scct,on_._...._8,.rAS8 I \Vi ll\'„ TLhc Xast Discourses ot our Xorb* THE LAST DISCOURSES OF OUR LORD.; ARRANGED AS READINGS FOR THE FORTY DAYS OF LENT. BY THE REV. ALFRED G. MORTIMER, D.D., RECTOR OF S. MARK'S, PHILADELPHIA. AUTHOR OF "HELPS TO MEDITATION," "LENTEN PREACHING," "THE CHURCH'S LESSONS FOR THE CHRISTIAN YEAR," ETC. THOMAS WHITTAKER, 2 AND 3, Bible House. 1905. TO THE RIGHT REVEREND OZI WILLIAM WHITAKER, D.D., LL.D., BISHOP OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN MEMORY OF TWELVE YEARS WORK IN HIS DIOCESE, THIS LITTLE VOLUME IS INSCRIBED WITH AFFECTIONATE RESPECT. Conttnte. £ent. PAGE I.— THE DEPARTURE OF JUDAS i S. John xiii. 31, 32. 2.— THE NEW COMMANDMENT 10 S. John xiii. 33-35. 3.— THE QUESTION OF S. PETER 19 S. John xiii. 36-38. 4.— THE TRAINING OF S. PETER 27 S. John xiii. 38. 5.— THE MANY MANSIONS OF THE FATHER'S HOUSE 33 S. John xiv. 1-3. 6.— THE QUESTION OF S. THOMAS 41 S. John xiv. 4-6. 7.— CHRIST AS THE WAY 50 S. John xiv, 6. 8. -CHRIST AS THE TRUTH 56 S. John xiv. 6. g.— CHRIST AS THE LIFE 64 S. John xiv. 6. vii. &tnt I'AGE 10.— S. PHILIP'S REQUEST 72 S. John xiv. 7-11. II.— CHRIST'S ANSWER TO S. PHILIP ... 80 S. John xiv. 10-14. 12.— THE POWER OF CHRISTIAN PRAYER 87 S. John xiv. 13, 14. 13. -LOVE 94 S. John xiv. 15. 14.— THE COMFORTER 104 S. John xiv. 16. 15.— THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH iii S. John xiv. 16, 17. 16.— CHRIST'S COMING THROUGH THE HOLY GHOST 119 S. John xiv. 18-20. 17.— THE QUESTION OF S. JUDE 127 S. John xiv. 22-24. 18.— CHRIST'S LEGACY TO HIS DISCIPLES 135 S. John xiv. 25-27. 19.— UNSELFISH SORROW 143 S. John xiv. 28-31. 20.— CHRIST THE VINE 151 S. John xv. i. 21.— THE VINE AND THE BRANCHES ... 160 S. John xv. 2, 3. viii. Contentg. ^^ Btnt PAGE 22.— THE FRUITS OF UNION WITH CHRIST i68 S. John xv. 4, 5. 23.— THE RESULT OF SEPARATION FROM CHRIST 176 S. John xv. 6-10. 24.— THE JOY OF UNION WITH CHRIST ... 184 S. John xv. ii. 25.— THE FRIENDS OF CHRIST 191 S. John xv. 12-15. 26.— THE LAW OF VOCATION 200 S. John xv. 16. 27.— THE WORLD'S HATRED 210 S. John xv. 17-21. 28.— THE WORLD'S IGNORANCE 218 S. John xv. 21-25. 2g.— THE ADVOCATE AS CHRIST'S WITNESS 225 S. John xv. 26, 27. 30.— PERSECUTION THE RESULT OF THE WORLD'S HATRED 233 S. John xvi. 1-4. 31. -THE EXPEDIENCY OF UNPLEASANT TRUTHS 239 S. John xvi. 4-7. 32.— THE HOLY GHOST AND SIN 246 S. John xvi. 7, 8. ix. Btnt PAGE 33.— THE HOLY GHOST AND RIGHTEOUS- NESS 253 S. John xvi. 8, 10. 34.— THE HOLY GHOST AND JUDGMENT ... 259 S. John xvi. 8 and ii. 35.— THE HOLY GHOST OUR GUIDE 267 S. John xvi. 12-15. 36.— NATURAL AND SPIRITUAL SIGHT ... 277 S. John xvi. 16-19. 37.— SORROW TURNED INTO JOY 284 S. John xvi. 20-33. 38.— THE FATHER AND THE SON 293 S. John xvii. 1-5. 39.— THE SON AND THE DISCIPLES 304 S. John xvii. 6-19. 40.— THE SON AND THE CHURCH 314 S. John xvii. 20-26. X. (preface. Among the most sublime utterances of our Blessed Lord, would be placed, by the majority of Christians, His last Discourses. These were delivered partly in the Upper Chamber in Jerusalem and partly in some place on the way to Gethsemane. They are recorded by S. John in his Gospel, and are addressed to the eleven faithful apostles, and they constitute at once Christ's farewell and His final revelation to them. The pathetic occasion on which they were spoken, and the sublime character of the subjects of which they treat, endow these Discourses with a profound and unique interest for every Christian, and yet they rarely form the subject of addresses, and among our devotional works I know of only one in which they are treated with any fulness, namely, " The Upper Chamber," by the Rev. Father Bensoni XI. '^ (preface. S.SJ.E., which forms two volumes of the series entitled " The Final Passover." I read carefully the other volumes of this Series some ten years ago, but omitted these two, intending to take them up on another occasion. I, however, forgot them until my attention was called to them a few weeks ago, after this book was in the printer's hands. I regret, therefore, that I have not had the advantage of consulting them. I am acquainted with many Commentaries, and the best known works on the Passion, but the only one which I have used with any frequency in this book is Bishop Westcott's Commentary on S. John ; and my indebtedness to this, as to other works of the same author, is very great indeed. These addresses were originally given as Medita- tions in S. Mark's, Philadelphia, last Lent. They were taken down as delivered by a stenographer, from whose notes they are reproduced. 1 have, however, rearranged them in forty portions, so as to furnish devotional readings or subjects for medita- tion for the forty days of Lent. I have drawn attention to the most important variations in the text, and to inaccurate and Xll. (Preface> ^ inadequate translations. Beyond this, my plan has been simply to take the Words of our Lord paragraph by paragraph, explaining them and applying them, according to my ability, to the practical needs of Christians in our day. In putting forth these addresses I have gratefully to acknowledge, as on a former occasion, the encouragement and assistance of Mr. Elbridge T. Gerry, of New York. Together with the two volumes on the Passion, they form a somewhat complete, practical and devotional study of the last hours of our Blessed Lord's life. Mr. Gerry has thought that such a series of works may be helpful to the large class of persons whose occupation prohibits them from attending addresses, except in the evening, on week days in Lent. They may also, perhaps, be useful for daily readings at Lenten Services. A. G. M. S. Mark's, Philadelphia, All Saints, 1904. xiu. Baet ®t0cour0e0 of ^ut Borb, I. THE DEPARTURE OF JUDAS. S. John xiii. 31, 32. "Therefore, when he was gone out, Jesus said, Now is the Son of man glorified, and God is glorified in Him, If God be glorified in Him, God shall also glorify Him in Himself, and shall straightway glorify Him." [UR Lord's last Words to the world which He died to save were spoken from the pulpit of the Cross, but His last dis- courses to the disciples whom He had trained to carry on His work seem to have been spoken immediately after the institution of the Holy Eucharist, partly in the upper chamber, partly on the way to Gethsemane, or perhaps on the way to the Temple where His final prayer of self-consecration was uttered. I B ^^ @.6^ ^cbncBba^. The Words from the Cross consist of seven short sentences embodying great principles. The dis- courses, on the other hand, constitute the longest unbroken utterances of our Blessed Lord. In them He announces to His disciples the sad news of His departure from them, reveals to them the purposes and issues of that departure, and prepares them to expect and to receive that further gift of the Holy Ghost, through Whose power they were to accomplish the work for which their Master had trained them. The associations which gatiier around these dis- courses are most solemn, whether we regard them from the point of view of the occasion on which they were uttered — ^just after the celebration of the first Eucharist, just after the Apostles had made their first communion ; or whether we regard them from the point of view of their subject matter — their Lord's departure, and its consequences. These discourses stand alone among the utterances of Christ, not only because of their length — we have noliced that they constitute the longest unbroken utterances of our Lord, which have come down to us in the Gospels — but still more on account of the sublimity of their subject matter, and of a certain deep and affectionate pathos which pervades them throughout, and which may be traced to the sadness 2 €^t ©eparture of %ub CommMtmcnt ^^ Blessed Sacrament is always associated, by its nam % with this new commandment which Christ gave to His disciples. And surely this brinies before us another reason why we should love one another, not only that we are members of Christ's one Body, the Church, but that we are fellow-partakers of that one Body in the Eucharistic feast. Not only are we incor- porated into Him by baptism, but we feed on Him through Communion ; so that, by being nourished with the same spiritual food, we are knit together in the closest relationships of life. We are to love one another as Christ loved us, Who being in the form of God, was impelled by love for man in his perishing condition to take upon Him the form of a servant, and to become obedient unto the death of the Cross. From His throne in Heaven the Son of God beheld us in our need, and hastened to our succour, thou;:^h to help us and save us cost Him all the humiliation of the Incarnation, all the sorrows of the Passion ! And if we would fulfil this new commandment, we must, according to our own measure, strive to hasten to the succour of those members of Christ's Body whom we see to be in distress, and whom we are able to aid, either in mind, by sympathy ; in body, by ministering to their sickness ; or in 17 C estate, by supplying their wants. We must not grudge the trouble or pains this may involve ; for we are to love our brethren, not with a selfish love, but with the self-sacrificing love with which Christ loved us. i8 III. THE QUESTION OF S. PETER. S. John xiii. 36-38. ''Simon Peter said unto Him, Lord, whither goest Thou? Jesus answered him, Whither I go, thou canst not follow Me now ; but thou shalt follow Me afterwards. Peter said unto Him, Lord, why cannot I follow Thee now ? I will lay down my life for Thy sake. Jesus answered him, Wilt thou lay down thy life for My sake ? Verily, verily, I say unto thee, The cock shall not crow, till thou hast denied Me thrice." UR Lord's announcement of His approaching departure leads to questions from four of His disciples, questions which reveal some- thing of the character and spiritual comprehension of each of the questioners, and something of the difficulties which His words presented to their minds. The questioners were S. Peter, S. Thomas, S.Philip, and S. Jude, each of whom, taking up our Lord's 19 -o^ ^mt ^xiia^ in &enf. words, seeks further enlightenment as to their meaning. S. Peter as usual is the first to speak, for we read that, " Simon Peter saith unto Him, Lord, whither goest Thou ? Jesus answered him, Whither I go, thou canst not follow Me now ; but thou shalt follow Me afterwards. Peter saith unto Him, Lord, why cannot I follow Thee now? I will lay down my life for Thy sake." It was a natural question to ask, when S. Peter heard our Lord speak of His departure, but it showed a very imperfect comprehension on his part in regard to much of Christ's past teaching ; for it probably implied that S. Peter, like most of the other disciples, looked forward to the setting up of a temporal kingdom in this world, with our Lord as the Messiah. It showed that S. Peter had not understood the revelation of the Passion, at which, indeed, he stumbled so badly, that his Master then said to him, " Get thee behind Me, Satan."* Our Lord's answer to his question is not direct. It was an answer to what was passing in S. Peter's mind, rather than to S. Peter's words. The Apostle had asked, " Lord, whither goest Thou ? " and Christ replied, " Whither I go, thou canst not follow Me now ; but thou shalt follow Me afterwards." * S. Matt. xvi. 23. 20 €^c iXucBJion of g, (peter. ^ From this it is evident that when S. Peter said, "Lord, whither goest Thou?"' he was not moved so much by curiosity in regard to the place where our Lord was going, as by his desire to go with Him, to accompany Him. So that, without directly announcing the goal of His journey, our Lord warns S. Peter that he cannot follow Him now ; though He comforts him with the assurance that he shall follow Him afterwards. S. Peter could not follow Christ where He was going, to another world, at that time for many reasons. First of all, S. Peter was not spiritually pre- pared for his place in heaven ; his own character had not yet been sufficiently disciplined and developed ; his own faith which seemed to him so strong, was not even able to bear the shock of temptation in the high-priest's hall, where he denied his Master. He was not morally ready. But there was another reason — his work was not yet done ; indeed, it had scarcely begun, that work for which his Master had been for three years training him, the work of preaching the Gospel, and organising the infant Church in the world. Before S. Peter could follow Christ to his reward, he must do his work ; he must suffer ; and, by suffering, be made perfect, that he might become one of the foundation stones of the City of God. How great was the work that S. Peter 21 ^ ^ixBi S^tbdg in SLCnt, was to accomplish in this world before he won his crown ! But our Lord gives him a promise, *' Thou shalt follow Me afterwards." And that promise, remember, was renewed to him after his denial, after his peni- tence, after his pardon ; when, at the Lake of Galilee, our Lord told him the manner of death by which he should glorify his Master, and follow Him into the world beyond ; for then He said to Peter, '* Verily, verily, I say unto thee, when thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkest whither thou wouldest : but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not." And S. John remarks, '* This spake He, signifying by what death he should glorify God.""*^ " Whither goest Thou ? " Many who have visited Rome will remember a little church, called the Chapel of the Domine Quo Vadis — " Lord, whither goest Thou ? " It is associated with a legend of very early authority,! that when S. Peter was fleeing from Rome, from the Mamertine Prison, our Lord met him ; and to his question, '' Lord, whither goest Thou ? " replied, " I am going to Rome to be crucified again." S. Peter, from these words, undcr- * S. John xxi. i8, 19. t It is referred to by Origcn in " Joann " xx. 12. 22 t^c 4jue6tion of ^. (peter. ^ stood that the hour of his own martyrdom had come ; and, returning to his prison at Rome, was shortly afterwards crucified, under Nero. The place where the meeting is said to have taken place is marked by the Chapel of the Doinine Quo Vadis. S. Peter says to our Lord, ** Why cannot I follow Thee now ? I will lay down my life for Thy sake." Here we recognise the impetuous nature which always desires to act at once, and frets at waiting. We cannot but admire the spirit that prompted these words. The tendency of the world in regard to unpleasant duty is, as a rule, not to act at once, but to put off as long as possible the disagreeable duty. But S. Peter, with his impulsive temperament, is not content with the promise, " Thou shalt follow Me afterwards," but asks, " Why cannot I follow Thee now ? I will lay down my life for Thy sake." He did not ask where our Lord was going, but he recognised from our Lord's words that He was going into some great peril, and at once offers to share the peril with Him, even though it should involve the sacrifice of his very life. " I will lay down my life for Thy sake." He thought he had counted the cost when he said these words ; he believed that he could lay down his life for Christ before Christ had laid down His life for him. But later on he learned that it was only 23 '^ ^ixBt S^ibag in &cni. through Christ's Passion that his own martyrdom became possible. He was to wait. How much has to be learned in periods of waiting ; how much, too, has to be done in those times of delay, that we may be able, when the opportunity offers, to embrace it, and to accomplish God's work. S. Peter was tested that very night in the high-priest's house ; the opportunity offered, but he was not ready. And so, alas ! he denied his Master from fear of a maid-servant. But afterwards when, in that period of long waiting, he had learned, by the things which he had suffered, and had come to experience the grace of Jesus Christ, he was able to lay down his life as a martyr. In the high-priest's house he did not even dare to confess Christ before a few soldiers and servants, but after the period of waiting and preparation he cheerfully went back to Rome, to suffer and to die for his Master. What a lesson there is for us here ! — that the periods of waiting in this world, when God does not seem to have anything very especial for us to do, must be used as periods of learning and of working. How many there arc who say, " I do not know what my vocation is in life ; God has not shown me my work, and therefore I will do nothing, until He does call mc." 24 t^c ^uegtion of ^. (pcicx. ^ By such, when the call comes, the discovery is often made that they are not able to follow Him. They are like the foolish virgins, who, while pro- fessing to be waiting for Christ, when the cry was heard, " Behold, the Bridegroom cometh ; go ye out to meet Him,"* discovered that, in their period of waiting, the oil in their lamps had become exhausted. It is in times of waiting that we should be learning and labouring, striving to fashion and sharpen the instrument ourselves ; so that, when God is ready to use it, the instrument may be found ready for His purpose. If we take the lives of those who have accomplished the greatest work for God, we shall find that almost always they had to wait many, many years before the opportunity offered for carrying out what they felt to be their life's work. But we shall also discover that they did not spend these years in idleness ; they spent them in prayer and the study of God's Word ; so that when the moment came that the opportunity presented itself, the work was done with marvellous celerity and success, because they had been so long preparing themselves to do it. To how many it is just the other way ! They * S. Matt. XXV. 6. 25 •^ ^ixBt St^ibag in £enf. waste the periods of waiting ; and when the time of work comes, they find that they have so blunted their spiritual perceptions and ruined their natural gifts, that they are no longer adle to do the work which God puts before them ; not because they are not willing to do it, but because they have lost, they have forfeited, the power to do it. " Thou canst not follow Me now; but thou shalt follow Me afterwards." 26 IV. THE TRAINING OF S. PETER. S. John xiii. 38. ' ' Jesus answereth, Wilt thou lay down thy life for My sake ? Verily, verily, I say unto thee. The cock shall not crow, till thou hast denied Me thrice." UR Lord's repetition of S. Peter's exact words, " Thy life for Me wilt thou lay- down ? " has a deep pathos. It is as though He accepted the essential truth of S. Peter's generous assertion, while He pointed out the impossibility of its fulfilment at that time. He tells S. Peter he will have an opportunity that very night of proving himself, not by dying for his Master, but by confessing that he is a disciple. An opportunity ? Nay, three opportunities ; and that in every case he shall not only lamentably fail 27 '^^^ ^ivBJ ^dfurbag in &enf. to confess his Master, but shall shamefully deny Him! There are few episodes in the Gospels more full of instruction than this ; for, from the example of S. Peter, we learn that real strength is to be measured, not by generous impulses, but by the recognition of two fundamental truths — our own natural weakness and inability, and God's unceasing love. As a great ascetic writer teaches,* the foundation of all spiritual hfe must be laid in distrust of self and perfect trust in God. S. Peter learned these truths by the experience of the three years spent with our Blessed Lord, and they were not entirely grasped by him until the last disastrous fall which our Lord here foretells — his threefold denial. Then S. Peter fully learned his own weakness ; and from the look of Jesus, which won him back to penitence, and the words of Jesus after His Resurrection, he learned the infinite and unchanging love of God. With S. Peter, the generous impulse was always present ; but, through over-confidence in self, it only led to humiliation and failure. We may notice three instances especially : when S. Peter saw our Lord walking upon the sea, he did not hesitate to say, " Lord, if it be Thou, bid me come unto Thee on the * C/. Scupoli's ''Spiritual Combat." 28 t^t Zv(Xxnxna of g« (pcict. ^ water." And when Jesus said, " Come," he cast himself upon the water, and walked upon the very waves. But, alas ! he looked for a moment away from Christ, and observed that the wind was boisterous, and the waves threatening, and his faith began to fail, and he began to sink. He cried, " Lord, save me. And immediately Jesus stretched forth His hand, and caught him, and said unto him, O thou of little faith, wherefore didst thou doubt ? "* There S. Peter learned the instability of his own faith, and the constancy of Christ's love. His hand was outstretched to save him the moment he began to sink. The second instance follows immediately upon S. Peter's great confession of Christ's Divinity. To the question, " Whom do men say that I, the Son of Man, am ? "f the Apostles gave various answers ; but S. Peter was the first and only one to say, " Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God. "J Our Lord praises him for this great confession, and gives him a glorious promise and privilege. And yet we read only a few verses further on in the chapter, that when Christ proceeded to tell S. Peter of His Passion, the Apostle stumbled at it, " and began to rebuke Him, saying, be it far from Thee, Lord : this * Cf. S. Matt. xiv. 28-34. t S. Matt. xvi. 13. X S. Matt. xvi. 16. 29 ^ ^ixBi ^(Xtutbdg in £enf. shall not be unto Thee." But Christ " turned, and said unto Peter, Get thee behind Me, Satan ; thou art an offence unto Me ; for thou mindest not the things that be of God, but those that be of men."* S. Peter's third great fall was in the high-priest's palace, and it took place after our Lord's warning : "Verily, verily, I say unto thee, The cock shall not crow till thou hast denied Me thrice." S. Peter, knowing that some great peril threatened his Master, had said : " Lord, ... I will lay down my life for Thy sake." Christ tells him that before the night is past he will have learned his own weakness. It will not be a question of laying down his life, but only an acknowledgment of his disciple- ship. S. Peter thinks that this is impossible — " Although all shall be offended, yet will not I." But he learns with bitter shame that his Master knows him better than he knows himself; that his own boasted strength, apart from Christ's grace, is utter weakness. And this knowledge for ever destroys his self-confidence, and establishes the conviction of his own natural weakness. Thus he learns to distrust himself; but he learns more — to trust Christ ; for, when he had so shamefully denied his Master thrice, we read that " the Lord turned, and looked upon Peter. And Peter remembered the * C/. S. Matt. xvi. 21-24. 30 t^c ^r dining of g> Qpeter. ^ word of the Lord, how He had said unto him, Before the cock crow, thou shalt deny Me thrice. And Peter went out, and wept bitterly.'"^ What was there in that look of Jesus which pierced S. Peter's heart, and recalled him to penitence ? It is worth while noticing carefully the exact word which S. Luke uses (eVe/SXe-y/^ei/). The verb compounded with the preposition (iv), signifies, not merely to look upon a person, but to look with a swift, penetrating glance. So that it implies that our Lord looked S. Peter through and through, and read his very heart It is not a little suggestive that this same word is used of the look which our Lord cast upon S. Peter the first time He met him, when He said to him, " Thou art Simon the son of Jona : thou shalt be called Cephas. "f The look recalled our Lord's warning (this S. Luke tells us). But may it not also have recalled that first meeting with his Master, when He uttered the glorious promise, " Thou shalt be called Cephas " — the rock ? As S. Peter pondered upon his sin, what memories must have flooded his mind — the glorious promise, the shameful failure, but also the unwearied love of his Master ! On Easter Day, we know that our Lord appeared to S. Peter, although we are not told what passed * S. Luke xxii. 6 1, 62. f S. John i. 42, 31 between them ; for a veil is drawn over the inter- course of the penitent soul with the great Absolver. But later, by the Lake of Galilee, we learn that S. Peter was fully restored to his pastorate. After that he is a different man ; he has learned the two great truths — to distrust himself and to trust God. With the exception of the incident at Antioch, recorded in the Epistle to the Galatians, there is no further trace of weakness in S. Peter. I said that this episode is full of instruction for us all ; for we all alike have to learn by experience these two fundamental truths of the spiritual life. We have to learn them where S. Peter learned them — in the school of temptation. And until we have learned them, we, like S. Peter, shall be constantly liable to find our most generous impulses leading us to shameful failure. 32 V. THE MANY MANSIONS OF THE FATHER'S HOUSE. S. John xiv. 1-3. ' ' Let not your heart be troubled : ye believe in God, believe also in Me. In My Father's house are many mansions : if it were not so, I would have told you. I go to prepare a place for you. And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto Myself; that where I am, there ye may be also." HE question of S. Thomas, which follows that of S. Peter, is introduced by, and arises out of, the section with which the fourteenth chapter of S. John begins, " Let not your heart be troubled : ye believe in God, believe also in Me." There had been much to fill the disciples' hearts with sorrow and alarm ; not only the announcement 33 r) ^ i^ixBt (Qtonbag in &enf. of their Master's departure, but the warning of the treachery of Judas — "One of you shall betray Me;"* and of the weakness of S. Peter — " Thou shalt deny Me."t There was much to fill their minds with terror. So now, in the touching words with which this chapter opens, our Lord consoles His disciples — " Let not your heart be troubled : ye believe in God, believe also in Me." It is difficult to decide the correct translation of the latter part of this verse. The two verbs " believe " in the Greek are precisely the same. They may be either in the indicative or the imperative mood. So that the translation may be either, " Ye believe in God, and ye believe in Me ; " or it may be, " Believe in God, and believe in Me." The rendering in our Bible is unfortunate, in that it translates the first verb as indicative, and the other as imperative. Probably the best scholars agree that both should be imperative — " Believe in God, and believe in Me also." Thus you will see the reason why they were not to be troubled. "Let not your heart be troubled." Why? Believe in God, and believe in Me also. Why should you not be troubled ? Because you believe in God. This means something much more than a mere intellectual acceptance of the fact of God's existence. * S. Jolui xiii. 21. t S. Matt. xxvi. 34. 34 t h (tttdng (fflctngjong. ^ It implies that faith in God which issues in perfect trust in Him. The preposition (ds) which S. John uses with the verb sicrnifies, or rather suggests, a complete transference of trust of oneself to another. Believe in God; that is, put all your trust in Him. If you do, you will not be troubled. Belief in God! and what does this imply? As I have said, not merely a belief in God's existence, but some realisation of God's character, a belief in His attributes of Omniscience, Omnipotence, and Love. If we believe in God's Omniscience, we realise that He knows our necessities and troubles before we ask, and our ignorance in asking. If we believe in His Omnipotence, we know that He can help us in all our troubles, that no difficulties are too great for Him. And if we believe in His Love, that He loves us ; then we shall be sure, not merely that He can help us to the uttermost, but that He wz// help us as is best for us. Believe, then, in God, and you will not be troubled. And then our Lord goes on to say, " Believe also in Me." The exact repetition of the phrase implies that Christ is what the Father is — God. Believe in God, and believe in Me. And surely this was the reason why their hearts were not to be troubled, either by the news of His departure, or the warning of the treachery of Judas, or of the denial of S. 35 ^^ ^ix&i (Qtonbag in i^txd. Peter ; for, if Christ be God, He can comfort, console, and help them in all their trials. Then our Lord goes on to say, " In My Father's house are many mansions : if it were not so, I would have told you ; for I go to prepare a place for you." Throughout these last discourses of our Blessed Lord we observe the prominence of the word "Father;" and that God, as our Father, is set before us as the goal of life. Jesus says, " I go unto the Father."* And He invites us to come to the Father, through Him — "No man cometh unto the Father, but by Me."t So here He says, " In My Father's house are many mansions." The word translated " mansion " (ftov^) occurs only twice in the New Testament, both times in this chapter — in this verse, and again in the twenty-third verse, where our Lord, speaking of His Father, says, " We will come . . and make our abode {yLovr]v) with Him.":}: The word " abode " in the latter verse is the same word which is here translated "mansion." Now, what precisely does the word mean ? The word " mansions " is itself taken from the Latin translation (mansiones), and adequately represents the Greek. It literally means the stopping-places by the roadside where travellers on a journey found rest and refreshment. Hence, there are bound up * St. Joliu xiv. 28. t ^' Jolin xiv. 6. % ^' J**^"'" ^i^. 23. 36 with it two ideas — repose and progress. They were places where the traveller reposed for the night, in order that he might have strength for a fresh effort in his journey the next day. The fact that our Blessed Lord is speaking of mansions in heaven has led some to draw the inference that in heaven our life will be one of progress ; at least, the word used suggests this inference. " In My Father's house are many mansions." There will be room for all tliere. He is about to tell them how they will be treated in this world ; that they will be driven out of the synagogues ; that they will be outcasts among their own nation ; but, He says, there will be plenty of room for all in heaven. When S. Mary and S. Joseph came to Bethlehem, to be enrolled in the census, they found that there was no room in the inn. But in heaven there is no such danger ; there will be room for all. " If it were not so, I would have told you ; (for) I go to prepare a place for you." The best manu- scripts give us the word " for," which is not in our Bibles. It makes the sentence much clearer. It is as though our Lord would say, I have not withheld from you the sorrowful news of My departure ; and therefore I would not hesitate to tell you even sadder news, if it were necessary. But now I tell 37 ^ ^ixBt (^lonbag in SLcnt. you joyful news — that there are many mansions in My Father's house, and that I go to prepare a place for you. This, indeed, is the bright side of Christ's depar- ture. If He does not go to make preparation for us, we cannot follow. The disciples, doubtless, would have wished Him to have stayed with them on this earth ; but He tells them that, in going before to prepare a place for them in heaven, He affords them both the possibility and opportunity of following where He has gone before. In the next verse He says, " And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and I will receive you unto Myself; that where I am, there ye may be also." From these words we learn that our Lord's departure is the condition of His return. His visible separation from them is necessary as the condition of His real union with them, through the operation of the Holy Ghost. The Christian, after Pentecost, is nearer to Christ than the Apostles were before the Passion. They were near to Him locally. They could see Him, and hear Him. and touch Him, with their bodily senses ; but there was no real spiritual union between Him and them. After the coming of the Holy Ghost they were to be incorporated into Christ, to become living members of His Body. So that, in this sense, 38 His departure was necessary as the condition of His return to them through a more intimate union than at that time they could conceive of. Our rendering, " I will come again, and receive you unto Myself," is not quite correct. It should be, " I am coming again, and I will receive you unto Myself." The first verb is in the present tense ; the second, in the future. Thus the Greek brings out the fact that our Lord is constantly coming. Though in this passage He is referring, primarily, to His last coming at the end of the world, we must not limit His coming to that ; for Christ comes to the world, to the Church, and to each individual Christian, continually. He came to them at His Resurrection ; He came again at Pentecost, through the operation of the Holy Ghost ; He comes to each sinner at the moment of conversion ; He comes to us in every Communion ; He comes to us in our daily study of His Word, if we read it prayerfully. And lastly, He comes to us at the moment of death and at the Day of Judgment. And all these comings are comprehended in those words, " I am coming again." But while the Greek present implies, not a mere act, but a state — that Christ is constantly coming — the future can only be referred to one occasion, " I will receive you unto Myself," that is, at the moment 39 ^^ -^ixQi (^onbag in SLCni. of death, when He calls us away from this world of sorrow and sin, and takes us to be with Him. "That where I am, ye may be also." Where Christ is, there is Paradise. So He said to the penitent robber on the cross, " To-day shalt thou be with Me in Paradise."* Thou shalt be with Me ; therefore, thou shalt be in Paradise. After His Ascension, Paradise was heaven ; for, as we profess in our Creed, " He ascended into heaven, and sitteth on the right hand of God the Father Almighty." Our Lord's glorified humanity is not ubiquitous. Locally, it is now only in one place, at the right hand of God the Father in heaven. Sacramentaily, supra- locally. His humanity is present in the Blessed Sacrament. But we have no reason to suppose that it is present with the souls in the Intermediate State. His divinity is there, as everywhere, but not His Humanity. So in these words our Lord assures us that after we have left this world of sin, and passed through a state of purification, we shall be with Him, where He is reigning with all the saints. * .S. Luke xxiii. 43. 40 VI. THE QUESTION OF S. THOMAS. S. John xiv. 4-6. " And whither I go ye know, and the way ye know. Thomas saith unto Him, Lord, we know not whither Thou goest ; and how can we know the way ? Jesus saith unto him, I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life : no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me." UR Blessed Lord, consoling His disciples in their grief at His departure, tells them that He goes to prepare a place for them in His Father's house ; that where He is, they may be with Him ; that He is coming again, and will receive them unto Himself. And then He adds, " Whither I go> ys know the way ; " for this is the correct reading, and not, as we find in our Bible, " Whither I go ye know, and the way ye know." Our Lord meant to remind them that He had so 41 ^ ^ixBt ZwBba^ in SLCnt. often told them of the way by which they were to follow Him, that they ought to know it well. It was to be a way of suffering and of sacrifice, the way of the Holy Cross ; for how many times He had warned them that no one could be His disciple, who did not take up his cross and follow Him. '' Whither I go," He says, *'ye know the way." I am going to My Father in heaven ; His house, in which are the many mansions, is My goal ; and the way by which I must reach it is the way of suffering, the way of self-sacrifice and love. At this point S. Thomas interrupts, and says, " Lord, we know not whither Thou goest ; and how know we the way ? " (the word " can " is not found in the best text). It is most interesting to observe that the questions asked by the different Apostles are in strict accord with what we know of their temperament and spiritual character. S. Peter's question, " Why cannot I follow Thee now } I will lay down my life for Thy sake,"''' is precisely the utterance which might be expected from one of his sanguine, impulsive nature. So, too, we shall find that the interruption of S. Thomas is just what might be expected from a man of his natural temperament and spiritual development. S. Thomas is a very distinct type of character * S. John xiii. 37, 42 t^c 4jue6tton of ^. t^om God caused by sin ; and, regarded as a Sacrament, it becomes the instrument by which man is brought into closest communion with God. These are but a few of the lines along which we may trace the work food accomplishes in making man what God would have him to be ; and all these lines meet in the Person and work of Jesus Christ, Who is the Bread of life and the Food of man. Food taught man the law of dependence upon his fellow-man and upon God. And surely this was the great lesson of the life of Jesus Christ, Who said, ^' My meat is to do the will of Him that sent Me, and to accomplish His work;"* Who taught absolute dependence upon God, and also enjoined subjection to those in authority in this world. The dream of independence finds no support in our Lord's teaching ; on the contrary, its keynote is, " Whosoever exalteth himself shall be abased ; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted."t Food taught man the necessity of labour ; and the Son of God came into the world as a labouring Man, rising early, and late taking rest, saying, " I must work the works of Him that sent Me, while it is day : the night cometh, when no man can work."t Food, too, had its effect upon man as a social * S. John iv. 34. t S. Luke xiv. 1 1. J S. John ix. 4. 70 being, becoming the bond of union with his fellow- man, and the instrument of sacrifice and communion with God. And our Lord Jesus Christ, above all, came to teach men that they are brethren, to bind them together in the bonds of love. And further, He came to be the Sacrifice Which should take away the sin of the world, and should make God and man at one. And in the Sacrament of the Eucharist He not only becomes the Food of man's soul, but the Means by which man is united to God. All the laws, therefore, of food seem to have prepared the human race for this great revelation of God in Jesus Christ, that He is the Life of man, and that this Life is imparted to man by feeding upon His flesh. 71 X. ^econb ^aturbctg in £enf. S. PHILIP'S REQUEST. S. John xiv. 7-11. " If ye had known Me, ye should have known My Father also : and from henceforth ye know Him, and have seen Him. Philip saith unto Him, Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us. Jesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known Me, Philip ? he that hath seen Me hath seen the Father ; and how sayest thou then. Shew us the Father? Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me ? the words that I speak unto you I speak not of Myself: but the Father that dwelleth in Me, He doeth the works. Believe Me that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me : or else believe Me for the very works' sake." F ye had known Me, ye should have known My Father also: from henceforth ye know Him, and have seen Him." Before we consider the application of this verse we must notice the difference between the two verbs 72 ^. (p^i(ip*B (Reciueet. ^ translated by " to know." " If ye had known Me " (eyvcoKeiTe). The word used here means, to know a thing by observation. It is as though our Lord had said, If you had used your opportunities during the three years which you have lived with Me, you would have come to know Me from what you have seen and heard of Me, in such a way that you would have " known My Father also." But here we have a different verb (rjbeire), which signifies, to know a thing by reflection. There are certain things which we come to know by the exercise of our senses. There are others which we know by reflection. Our Lord says : If ye had come to know Me by observation during My life, ye would have known, by reflection, My Father; for ye would have seen Him manifested in Me. This verse concludes our Lord's answer to the question of S. Thomas. S. Thomas, however, is silent, apparently because he desired to ponder over and reflect upon Christ's words. But here S. Philip takes up the conversation and asks, as though the request had been suggested by what our Lord had just said, " Lord, shew us the Father, and it sufiflceth us." S. Philip, in spiritual comprehension, seems to have been the slowest and dullest among the apostles ; for, while the objection of S. Thomas 73 ^ ^econb ^dtutbcij in SLcnt. is the objection of a thoughtful man, the request of S. Phih'p is based upon a merely superficial apprehension of our Lord's teaching. He takes up our Lord's last words, "If ye had known Me, ye should have known My Father also : and from henceforth ye know Him, and have seen Him," and says, " Lord, shew us the Father, and it suffices us." Instead of spiritual sight, he asks for bodily sight, not considering how impossible was his request. If we look back to the beginning of S. Phih'p's spiritual life, we shall find the same characteristics manifested. He was one of the first five disciples whom Jesus called, as S. John records in the first chapter of his Gospel. Of these five, two came to Christ of their own volition or seeking ; two were brought to Him by their friends. S. Philip stands alone among the five as the one who had to be sought by Christ. We read that, Jesus '' findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow Me."* He has to be sought, and found, and commanded to follow Him ; and then he obeys. He had probably had the same teaching as the others in the school of S. John Baptist ; so that, like them, he was prepared to receive Christ ; and having accepted His call, he brings his friend Nathanael to our Lord. * S. Jolin i. 43. 74 In his conversation with Nathanael we, however, recognise the same dulness in the blunders which he makes about Christ's Person. He says to Nathanael, " We have found Him, of Whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph."* Nathanael objects, " Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth ? " The prophets to whom Philip referred had foretold that the Messiah should come from Bethlehem. S. Philip makes two blunders. Our Lord was not, in a true sense, Jesus of Nazareth ; and He was not the Son of Joseph. It is true, that He dwelt at Nazareth after His return from Egypt, and so was often spoken of by the common people as " Jesus of Nazareth." But if Philip referred to the prophets, he ought to have remembered that ^/ley spoke of One Who should come from Bethlehem. And then, too, Jesus was not the Son of Joseph ; He was the Son of Mary, by the operation the Holy Ghost. S. Philip is brought before us in the Gospels in two other passages, which do not, however, throw any special light upon his character. But the cir- cumstances of his call, and of his bringing his friend Nathanael to Christ, suggest very much the type of spiritual character which is manifested in * S. John i. 45, 75 ^ ^econb ^aturbag in SLtnt the request, " Shew us the Father, and it sufficeth us." S. PhiHp's difficulty is not unbelief, so much as spiritual dulness ; for the very request, " Shew us the Father," implies the belief that Christ could show them the Father ; but also exposes his want of spiritual preception in supposing that the Father could be seen with bodily eyes. Our Blessed Lord's reply is full of deepest pathos and reproach, " Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known Me, Philip?" Here the word " to know " is to know by observation. Have you witnessed My life so long, and learned nothing from it ? Have you listened to My words so often, and forgotten what they taught ? "I and the Father are one." '* The Father is in Me, and I in Him."* " He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father ; " not because he hath seen the Father in His absolute Being, but because he hath seen God revealed in the Fatherly relation, revealed as Father ; for in Christ, as S. Paul tells us in the Epistle to the Colossians, "dwellcth all the plentitude of the Godhead bodilywise."t In this reproach of our Lord to S. Philip we have a most important spiritual distinction brought before us, perhaps the most important in the whole spiritual * S. John X, 30 ; 38, f Col. ii. 9. 76 ^. (p^idf'B (Request. ^ life — the difference between knowing Christ, and knowing about Christ. S. Philip had followed our Lord for some three years. He knew a great deal about Him ; he knew what He had said ; He knew what He had done — the works of wonder, the words of love; but, somehow, he had not come to know Christ. There are many Christians who really desire to serve Christ faithfully, who, either from spiritual dulness, or from some other cause, are very much like S. Philip. They know a great deal about God ; they have read the Gospels through again and again ; they have read many books on our Lord's life ; they have heard sermons, and lectures, and meditations. And in these various ways they have come to amass a great deal of information about Christ. They could answer almost any question which could be asked them in regard to our Lord's history. But they do not know Christ in the intimate knowledge of spiritual communion with Him; they do not know Him in the intimacy of spiritual friendship. It sometimes happens that we have read a great deal about some great man, one of the world's heroes, who happens to be contemporary with us. We have read, perhaps, a great many biographies of this man ; and we have formed our own mental picture of the man and of his character. We think 77 ^ ^econb ^aturbag in &ent, we know him. But some day it comes to pass that we are introduced to him, and come to know him as a friend. And very often we find that all our conceptions of him are wrong. He is not a bit like what we thought he was. So it is with Christ. Knowing a3out Christ, and knowing Christ, are very different things. We come to know about Christ by reading about Him. We come to know Him, chiefly in meditation, in prayer, and in communion. You get to know a man, not by reading about him, but by talking to him. An hour's conversation reveals more to you of the man, than reading many books about him. So you get to know Christ through prayer, especially mental prayer, or meditation. And I suppose it is on this account, on account of its immense value, that Satan tries to discourage people so much in regard to meditation. He tries to make them satisfied with knowing about God, with reading books which are interesting, instead of going through the hard work of speaking to God in meditation, listening for His Voice ; and so coming to know Him through personal intercourse. Let us prayerfully consider Christ's reproach to S. Philip, and ask ourselves whether it applies to us — " Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known Me, Philip ? " How many years is 7S it since we gave ourselves to Christ ? Can we say, humbly but sincerely, that we have learned to know Him as the Lord of our Life, as our Master, and as our Friend ? 79 XL ^econb Otonbag in &cnt. CHRIST'S ANSWER TO S. PHILIP, S. John xiv. 10-14. " Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me ? the words that I speak unto you, I speak not of Myself: but the Father that dwelleth in Me, He doeth the works. BeHeve Me that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me : or else believe Me for the very works' sake. Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on Me, the works that I do shall he do also ; and greater works than these shall He do ; because I go unto My Father. And whatsoever ye shall ask in My name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask anything in My name, I will do it." F we examine our Lord's answer, we find it falls very clearly into three divisions : first, there is the reproach, " Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known Me, Philip? "then there is the dogmatic statement, 80 e^rtefB Answer to ^. (p^tftp. ^ " He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father ; " and finally, an indication of the lines of evidence which should have led S. Philip to a clearer apprehension of our Lord's person and teaching. Let us turn our attention to this last part of Christ's answer. The difficulties which are brought before our Lord by different persons on different occasions, ought to be of special interest to us, inasmuch as they often call our attention to great principles which are in danger of being overlooked. Christ seldom meets a difficulty by a categorical yes or no ; but if His answer sometimes seems less direct, it is because it is more exhaustive, because our Lord answers not merely the verbal question, but unfolds principles which are involved in it. In the case under our consideration Christ appeals to evidence of two kinds — objective and subjective. First, He points out that both His words and His works bear witness to His relation to the Father, and to His intimate communion with Him. He says, " Believest thou not that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me? The words that I speak unto you, I speak not of Myself: but the Father that dwelleth in Me, He doeth the works. Believe Me that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me : or else believe Me for the very works' sake." Here He appeals to the objective evidence of His words and works. And He reminds S. Philip that 8i G ^ ^econb (gtonbdg in £enf. He had often called their attention to the fact that neither His words nor His works were self-originated; that both alike proceeded from His relation to the Father. For instance, He had said, " My doctrine is not Mine, but His that sent Me ; "* and, " I have not spoken of Myself ; but the Father Which sent Me, He gave Me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak."t Then, in regard to His works. He had said, " Verily, verily, I say unto you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, but what He seeth the Father do : for what things soever He doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.''^ And in reference to both words and works, Christ had said, " When ye have lifted up the Son of man, then shall ye know that I am He, and that I do nothing of Myself; but as My Father hath taught Me, I speak these things. And He that sent Me is with Me : the Father hath not left Me alone ; for I do always those things that please Him."§ With these aids from Christ's own words, the Apostles ought to have been able to draw the inference of His relation to the Father, and of the fact that He in His own Person manifested to them the Father; as He said to S. Thomas, *' If 3/c had * S. John vii. 16. f S, John xii. 49. | S. John v. 19, § S. John viii. 28, 29. 82 Cgrjgfg ^mmx to g, (pgtfty> ^ known Me, ye should have known My Father also from henceforth ye know Him, and have seen Him."* The same dogmatic statement which He makes in these words they could have reached themselves, if they had known Him as they ought to have known Him. His gracious words and wonderful works themselves bore witness of His communion with the Father. To use an imperfect illustration, we are told of the Apostles S. Peter and S. John, who were ignorant and unlearned men, that when they were brought before the authorities of the Jewish Church, "they took knowledge of them, that they had been with Jesus."t That is to say, the Jewish authorities explained the marvellous power of their preaching, and the miracle which they had wrought in the Name of Jesus, by the fact that they had been with Jesus. They drew this inference from their words and actions, which would otherwise have been incom- prehensible in unlettered and ignorant men ; they saw that they were the effects of their communion with Christ. So in the passage we are considering, though in a much higher sense, our Lord points to His own words and works as proving His communion with His Father, and as proving His Father's witness to * S. John xiv. 7. f Acts iv. 13. 83 ^ ^econb (tttonbag in S^cni, Him. He says, " Believe Me that I am in the Father, and the P'ather in Me : or else believe Me for the very works' sake." " Believe Me," He says ; that is, have faith in Me, on account of My teaching ; for I have taught you that I am in the Father, and the Father in Me. But if you have not this faith, at least use your reason, and from the divinity of My works deduce the necessary divinity of My nature. Believe Me, because you know Me. Or, if you do not, use your intellect and ask yourselves, could any mere man have uttered the words ; have done the miracles, that I have done? Then our Lord passes from the objective evidence of his words and works to certain subjective evidence which was not at that time in their possession, but which He promises soon shall be theirs. He says, "Verily, verily, I say unto you. He that believeth on Me, the works that I do shall he do also ; and greater works than these shall he do ; because I go unto the Father." Christ turns from the objective manifestation of God — that is, His manifestation outside of themselves by teaching and miracles — to the subjective manifes- tation of God, the manifestation of God which they shall experience in their own souls, in the exercise of new powers to be committed to them. They had wondered at His gracious words, which reached the 84 C^rjgfg (^ngn^er to g. (P^iftp> ^ hearts and swayed the minds of the multitude. They had marvelled at His miracles of healing the sick and raising the dead. And He tells them, as an evidence of the truth of His mission, that they shall do greater works than these. And we know His promise was fulfilled. After Pentecost, their preaching did reach men's souls, and through the Name of their Master they were able to heal the sick and to raise the dead. But in what sense were their works to be greater than their Master's? Not greater in kind, but greater in scope. The number of disciples who were gathered together in the upper chamber at Jerusalem after Christ's Ascension, as a result of His three years' preaching, was only some hundred and twenty; but the effect of S. Peter's sermon on the Day of Pentecost is seen in the gathering into the Church of about three thousand souls ! And the marvel of Christianity at its birth was its missionary power. In less than a generation it had spread almost throughout the then civilised world. Our Lord has appealed to His works as an objective evidence of the truth of His mission, and now announces that the believer shall find in himself a subjective proof of its truth in the experience of a new power, greater even than that which His Master had manifested — the power of converting the world 85 'O^ ^econb (Ulonbag in &tni. to Christ. And this was to follow as the result of His departure to His Father ; for our Lord says, " Greater works than these shall he do ; because I go unto the Father." But here we may ask in what sense, precisely, these greater gifts to the Church were to be the result of Christ's going to His Father. He tells us — because He would send the Holy Ghost the Comforter ; and because He would begin His work of intercession at the right hand of the Father. Of the mission of the Holy Ghost He treats fully in the rest of His discourse. But first He refers to the effects of His intercession in the new power which should be attached to the prayer of the Christian. This we may consider more fully in the next section. 86 XII. ^econb Cueebag in &tnt. THE POWER OF CHRISTIAN PRAYER, S. John xiv. 13, 14. *' Whatsoever ye shall ask in My name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. If ye shall ask anything in My name, I will do it." N these words our Lord reveals the instru- ment by which His disciples are to do greater works than those which they had seen Him do. The instrument is prayer ; not, however, mere prayer, but prayer in the Name, and therefore through the power, of Jesus Christ. All can pray to God as their Creator. The heathen can thus pray, and their prayers are heard. But the Christian prays, not merely to God as his Creator, but to God as his Father — his Father, because he is 87 an adopted son of God, adopted through incorpora- tion into Christ, a member of Christ, therefore a son of God. So he is taught to pray, "Our Father, Which art in heaven." Moreover, he can plead not only with God as a Father, but he can plead the merits, the infinite merits, of his great Elder Brother, the Lord Jesus Christ. Prayer with a Christian is something very different from prayer with a heathen. It is the prayer, not merely of the creature to his Creator, not only of a son to his Father ; but prayer made in the Name and through the merits of Jesus Christ, Who sitteth at the right hand of the Father, and adds to our prayer the plea of His merits, the power of His all-prevailing intercession. In these discourses our Lord returns many times to the subject of prayer. But if we examine His words at this point we may pass over, with but a brief notice, the other references to it First, we may observe in this passage the scope of prayer — " What- soever ye shall ask in My Name ; " how enormous ! "Whatsoever!" You will say the scope is unlimited. But no ; it is limited by the purpose of prayer — " Whatsoever ye shall ask in My Name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son." All prayer must have as its end the glorification of God through Jesus Christ. This, therefore, shuts out 88 t^t (porocx of C^rtgtian (praget > ^ those things which are not for God's glory, and therefore not for our own real good. " Whatsoever ye shall ask in My Name," that has God's glory as its end, " that will I do." People are often puzzled to know what they ought to pray for ; sometimes, what they ought no^ to pray for. In regard to prayer, we may divide all things into three classes : First, there are those things which we know are for God's glory and in accordance with God's Will ; such, for instance, as all things which pertain to our spiritual growth and sanctification. For these we may pray, with the absolute certainty that they will be granted. For it is revealed to us that, "This is the Will of God, even your sanctification."* Every- thing connected with our spiritual life, with our growth in goodness, we can pray for without doubt. We know that God wills to give it to us, desires that we should pray for it. We have the assurance of Christ's own promise that our prayer will be granted, if we do not put an obstacle in the way by our sins. Then, secondly, there is that large class of things about which we are quite sure that they are not for God's glory, not for our own good ; as, for instance, when we want to have our own way, knowing that it is not the right way ; when we desire success in some * I Thess. iv. 3. 89 '^^ ^cconb ^ueebag in SLCnt undertaking, which is not right or honest. These things are excluded entirely from the scope of Christian prayer ; for they are not for God's glory. Between these two divisions lies a third — that large class of things about which we are not sure whether they are according to God's Will or not ; success, for instance, in our undertakings in this world ; the restoration of health when we are sick ; the acquisition of wealth in business ; and many other things which may or may not be for God's glory and our own good. For these, therefore, we are to pray, with the proviso, " Not my will, but Thine, be done." We can pray to God to bless our undertakings in the world, the work we do, if we add, " Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven." We can ask Him to restore us to health when we are sick, if we are sure that we are entirely resigned to His Will, believing that He knows what is best for us ; and therefore leaving ourselves in His hands, to suffer or to get well, as He deems best for us. We learn, then, from this passage, first, the scope of Christian prayer — " Whatsoever ye shall ask in My Name ; " secondly, its purpose — " that the Father may be glorified in the Son ; " and thirdly, what is, perhaps, most important of all, we are taught the channel of Christian prayer — " in My Name." That 90 €^c (porotv of C^ttgftan (prager^ ^^ means, through My Person and character, through the merits of My Passion, through the power of My intercession ; for the channel of Christian prayer is the merits of Christ. Therefore, we finish our prayers with the words, " through Jesus Christ." It is in this that Christian prayer differs from all other prayer — that it pleads the Name which is above every name, the Name of Jesus ! Others may base their prayers upon God's mercy, or upon His love. The Christian adds to this the all-prevailing plea of Christ's own promise, " Whatsoever ye shall ask in My Name, that will I do." This plea is infinite in its power, as the merits of Christ are infinite. We plead, by all that Christ did for us, all that He suffered for us ; " By the mystery of Thy Holy Incarnation ; by Thy Holy Nativity and Circum- cision ; by Thy Baptism, Fasting, and Temptation, Good Lord, deliver us. By Thine Agony and Bloody Sweat ; by Thy Cross and Passion ; by Thy precious Death and Burial ; by Thy glorious Resurrection and Ascension ; and by the Coming of the Holy Ghost, Good Lord, deliver us." And more still — not only by all that He did for us, all that He suffered for us upon earth, we plead what He is now doing for us in heaven — His continual intercession at the right hand of the Father, where He ever liveth to make intercession for us. The 91 -^^ ^econb ZncQ^dT^ in £enf. Christian's prayer is of all-prevailing power ; because it flows through the channel of Christ's merits, it is made in the Name of Christ's Person. In the sixteenth chapter our Lord repeats this promise — "Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whatso- ever ye shall ask the Father in My Name, He will give it you." But there He adds, " Hitherto have ye asked nothing in My Name : ask, and ye shall receive, that your joy may be fulfilled."* You will observe that Christ Himself draws atten- tion to the fact of the difference between Christian prayer and other prayer. He says, " Hitherto have ye asked nothing tn My Name." The disciples had prayed ; they had asked, and had obtained, doubtless, many things from God ; but they had never used the all-prevailing plea, the Name of Christ Henceforth their joy was to be fulfilled in prayer ; for they were to pray with an assurance based upon Christ's own words, '' Whatsoever ye shall ask the Father in My Name, He will give it you." We must not, however, forget that, while Christ is the Channel of Prayer, the Holy Ghost is the Agent of Prayer. Prayer — Christian prayer, at least — is His work in the soul ; as S. Paul teaches us, " The Spirit also helpeth our infirmities : for we know not what we should pray for as we ought : but the Spirit * S. Jolin xvi. 23, 24. 92 €^c (power of C^ttBttdn (ftr ^ Itself maketh intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered."* You will observe that S. Paul points out three ways in which the Holy Spirit is to help us in our prayers. He is to help us in the matter of prayer, to teach us what we should pray for. He is to help us in the manner of our prayer, to teach us to pray as we ought ; to teach us how to pray. And then again, He is to make " intercession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered." Our Lord Jesus Christ at the right hand of the Father in heaven intercedes for us ; and the Holy Ghost in our own soul, acting upon our spirit, with aspirations, and desires, and sighs, and groanings, which cannot find words to express themselves, intercedes also. But here we must leave this inexhaustible subject, striving to learn from Christ's own words some simple lessons in regard to the supreme duty of prayer. * Rom. viii, 26. 93 XIII. 2^^tri) T3?ebne6bag in SLCni, LOVE. S. John xiv. 15. "If ye love Me, keep My commandments.' HE thought of love follows the thought of faith. In our last meditation we saw that faith by the agency of prayer can work even greater things than those which Christ did upon earth. Here we are taught that love issues in works of devotion especially manifested in an obedience which shows itself in loving self- sacrifice. Our translation has " keep my commandments," but in the best manuscripts the verb is in the future, not in the imperative : it is rr/pjyo-T/re not TTjpTja-are — If ye love Mc, ye will keep My commandments. 94 And this indeed is required by the relation of obedience to love. As our Lord implies, obedience is the necessary consequence of love. It is unnecessary to say, "If ye love Me, keep My commandments ; " for if you love, you will obey. And this is what our Lord is pointing out in this passage that obedience is the proof of perfect love, and therefore that disobedience is an evidence of the imperfection of love. For it is absolutely impossible to love God and wilfully to disobey His commandments. We may also notice that in the original the word translated " My" {ra^ evroXas ras (fias) is emphatic. Indeed, we might render the passage, " ye will keep the commandments, which are in a special sense Mine." Our Lord is evidently referring to the Gospel, since the commandments given therein are especially His, in that they are characteristic of His teaching which love will lead us to carry out with scrupulous fidelity. Love is the " antiphon " of these discourses. We find it enjoined in no less than seven distinct passages. In four, it is love directed towards God and associated with obedience,* as in the verse under our consideration ; and in three it is love directed especially towards our * S. John xiv. 15, 21, 23 ; xv. 9. 95 ^ 2;^trb TJJebneebag in £ent. neighbour."^' In this verse obedience is set forth as the consequence of love. "If ye love Me, ye will keep My commandments." And similarly in verse 23, " If a man love Me, he will keep My words." In verse 21, it is adduced as the evidence of love: " He that hath My commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth Me." In the next chapter, verse 9, obedience is shown to be the preservative of love : "If ye keep My command- ments, ye shall abide in My love." In all these passages it is love towards God of which Christ is speaking. In the other three instances in these discourses in which our Lord enjoins love it is the fruit of love towards God manifested in love towards our neighbour ; and in two of them our Lord proposes, as the model of that love which He commands us to show towards our neighbour, nothing less than His own wondrous love towards us. " A new com- mandment I give unto you. That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another." And again, "This is My command- ment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you ; " and here He adds, " Greater love hath no man than this that a man lay down his life for his friends," thus adducing the supreme act of * S. John xiii. 34 ; xv. 12, 17. 96 love by which He redeemed the world as the pattern of that love which we should show to one another. Our Lord Jesus Christ would therefore teach us that love is the true motive of all Christian life and of Christian obedience. It is the force, the principle, which is to regenerate the world by conquering sin. There are really only two great moral forces working in this world — the force of sin and the force of love. We can trace them from the very beginning making their way down the great stream of human history. We find them everywhere present, always in conflict and meeting for their supreme effort in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. There we learn what, perhaps, we should not have found out by our own observation, that the force of love is stronger than that of sin. As we look upon this world, marred and ruined by sin, we might be led to suppose that sin was stronger than love, because it seems to be so much more universal, and so much more certain in its effects. Everywhere we see the marks of sin ; not only in the prisons, and hospitals, and asylums, in which sin's victims are restrained or ministered to, but in almost every home, in almost every life, not only is sin present, but present to wreck all 97 H ^ 2^^irb TJ?ebne6i)dg in &eni that is fairest, all that is truest, all that is best in man. U we regard the world as a great battle-field in which the forces of sin and love are in ceaseless conflict, it would seem to the superficial observer that sin carried the warfare into every part of love's country, making prisoners everywhere. We see homes in which love reigns, homes of peace and happiness, but after a while sin finds entrance there, peace departs, happiness dies, the home is wrecked. This is the dark side of the picture, and it is true that the power of sin is enormous, that its captives are drawn from every class. But is there not another side to the picture — a brighter one ? We see bands of devoted men and women going down into the slums of our great cities to wage a hand-to-hand battle with sin. What is the motive that sends them there ? What is the force which gives them courage to meet the foe, to persevere through long years in their work, to endure all sorts of hardships and ingratitude. The motive, the force is love ! And if we see sin entering the homes of love and carrying off as prisoners those who dwell therein, we also behold the servants of love rescuing sin's prisoners, even those who have fallen most under its degrading power, and bringin;^ them back in triumph to the obedience of love. 98 £ot?e» -"^ Again, we behold men and women leaving not only their homes but their country, taking their lives in their hands and going as missionaries to the heathen, meeting the dangers of exposure, disease, and the violence and treachery of those under the dominion of false religions, who, under the influence of their native savagery, stop at no cruelty in their efforts to destroy missionaries bringing them the gospel of peace. Again, we ask, what is the spirit which inspires these missionaries ? What is the motive which leads them to abandon the comforts of civilisation, to face the dangers and difficulties of missionary work ? What is the force which supports them through many years under the disappointments of almost fruitless effort. It is the love of souls which flows from the love of God. It is the carrying out of our Lord's command, '' That ye love one another, as I have loved you." There is, however, another way in which we may estimate the relative strength of these forces of sin and love. It is by tracing them each to their source, to their origin. If we do this we shall find that sin has its origin in the devil ; it is diaboHcal in its very nature and source. But love, on the other hand, has its origin in God, since " God is Love ; " so that its source and 99 ^ ^^irb TJJeinecbag in £enf. nature is divine. Sin is a tremendous force, and its author is a creature of enormous power, but not almighty, not infinite. Love, on the other hand, is of God, and God is ahnighty, God is infinite, God is supreme. So that if we trace the two forces to their origin, we shall be saved the mistake, so natural to one who simply observes them in their conflict around us — the mistake of thinking that sin is more powerful than love. Again, we may investigate the relative power of these two forces, not only in a thousand petty engagements in the world about us to-day, but in their supreme effort, in their great duel on Calvary. There we see all the forces of sin marshalled and directed by their leader, Satan, in the attempt to crush out, in the Person of Jesus Christ, supreme goodness and supreme love. And what is the result? Sin can point to the dead Body of Jesus Christ hanging upon the cross, and can say, " See what I have done. I have killed the only perfect and sinless man. He came to set free from my power the human race. He came to redeem my slaves. He taught the Gospel of love. He lived a life of love, and now it is all over. There He hangs upon the cross, dead, killed by those whom He came to save. And it was I who incited them to do the deed, incited them to lOO £oioe. ^ murder Him Who desired to be their Deliverer. Can you doubt my power? Which is stronger, sin or love ? " It is true that the Passion of our Lord Jesus Christ, His death upon the cross, is a witness to the power and malice of sin ; but it is also a witness to the power of love. For the Christian beholding Christ upon the cross can reply to the challenge of the evil one, " Great is your power, but in compassing the death of Christ, you over- reached yourself, and your power was shattered in the very act by which you thought you had gained the victory." There is another point of view from which the death of Christ may be regarded. It is a manifestation of the greatness of love : " Greater love hath no man than this. That a man lay down his life for his friends." It was love that led the Son of God to become Incarnate, to endure all the ills which this sinful world could inflict upon him. It was love which took Him through the length and breadth of the land, healing the sick, raising the dead, feeding the hungry, teaching the ignorant. It was love which led Him to accept the return which an ungrateful world rendered Him for all these benefits. It was love which made Him willing to suffer and to die for man. loi -o^ ^^trb n3?ebnegbag in &enf. All the cruelty, all the humiliations of the Passion, were but opportunities for manifesting the greatness of His love. The wounds which were inflicted upon the sacred Body of Jesus by the Roman scourges, were but so many gaping lips eloquent with the language of love. " Behold, and see if there be any sorrow like unto My sorrow," says the prophet, speaking in the Person of Christ, and from the greatness of My sorrow learn the greatness of My love. It was love which led Him to sufl"er, not only the ignominies and cruelties of the Passion, but to die. " Greater love hath no man than this, That a man lay down his life for his friends." But love is stronger than death, and on the third day, Love arose triumphant from the dead. After forty days, Love ascended into heaven to reign there in His own Kingdom, and on earth still to sway by His Divine power the hearts and minds of His subjects. Sin could inflict death ; but Jesus passed through the grave and gate of death and rose again, and " death hath now no more dominion over Him." So it is now in tliis world, so will it always be while this world shall last, sin may persecute, may scourge, may crucify, may kill the body ; but there is a world beyond, a kingdom of love 102 in which sin shall be no more. And those who have been subjects of Jesus Christ in this life will bear witness through all eternity to the power of His love, that it was stronger than sin, stronger than death ; that by it, that is, by letting it rule their lives, they conquer sin. " If ye love Me, ye will keep My commandments," said our Lord to His disciples, and " This is My commandment, That ye love one another, as I have loved you." If we keep these commandments we shall be doing Christ's work in this world, helping to redeem the world from sin, for Love is the regenerative force of Christian life. 103 XIV. Z^ixt ^^utfibcig in &cni. THE COMFORTER. S, John xiv. i6. "And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you for ever." EFORE we consider the teaching in this verse, it will be worth our while to notice the word which is translated, or mis-trans- lated, " pray." It should be, " I will ask the Father," not ''pray the Father." Prayer implies the entire subordination of the suppliant, and the immeasurable superiority of Him to Whom prayer is directed. But this is not the case with our Lord's prayers, and so wc find in the original a word used here which is never used of our prayers to God. The verb here is epcorau^ and it is used in regard to prayer, 104 €^t Comforter. -«• only of petitions addressed to God by our Blessed Lord Himself. Wherever the prayers of the disciples are spoken of another word (itVeTv) is used. The word epcorai/, to ask, implies some sort of fellowship or equality between the person who asks and Him to Whom the request is addressed. We find this word used in the Synoptic Gospels where the disciples ask our Lord to do things for them in the spirit of fellowship, not of prayer. But wherever the word is used of prayer in the Gospels, it is used only in regard to our Lord's prayers to His Father. He asks, not as we ask, realising our inferiority. He asks with a sense of divine fellowship, so He says, " I will ask the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter." You will notice that there is no sense of uncertainty as to whether the prayer will be granted. Christ says, I will ask, and the Father will give. " I will ask the Father, and He will give you another Comforter." This title of the Holy Ghost occurs only in these discourses. We find it first in this verse, afterwards in the twenty-sixth verse of this chapter, in the twenty-sixth verse of the next chapter, and in the seventh verse of the sixteenth chapter. The word is only used in one other passage in the New Testament, and there it refers to our Lord Himself For in his first 105 ^ Z^ix'b 2^^ur6bag in &enf. Epistle, S. John says, " And if any man sin we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous ; and He is the propitiation for our sins. * Beautiful as the title " Comforter " is, and truly as it represents one great aspect of the work of the Holy Ghost, it is difficult to see how it can be regarded as a translation of the Greek irapdKKrjTos in these passages, since the Greek word can only be passive, while the word Comforter is active in its signification. If we take the word Paraclete to pieces we find it is compounded of two words, Trapd and kKtjtos, and that it means literally one who is called to your side to help you in some emergency or difficulty. The word Trapd/cXj^ro? is a forensic term, a legal term, generally applied to the advocate for the defence in a lawsuit, and thus it perfectly brings before us what the Holy Ghost is — a Divine Person, Who is called to our side to help us, to plead for us. As S. Paul says, *' The Spirit Itself maketh inter- cession for us with groanings which cannot be uttered. "-f The translation in S. John's Epistle, " the Advocate," is an accurate representation of the Greek, which "Comforter" is not. Our Lord says, " I will ask the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter." Wc may notice * I S. John ii. i. f Rom. viii. 26. 106 t^e Comforter. ^ the word " another/' which implies that they had already had one Comforter, our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, and this S. John shows in the passage we have just quoted, where he says, "If any man sin we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous." Their Comforter, their Advocate, Christ, was about to depart, and He promises that another Comforter, another Advocate, should take His place, and by His operation bring back to them, under a new and more intimate relationship, their Lord and Master. For Christ goes on to say, " I will not leave you orphans or comfortless : I will come to you." Since the title "' The Comforter " brings before us a very important aspect of the work of the Holy Ghost in our souls, it may be well for us to dwell for a moment on the character of the comfort which he ministers. " Comforter," which is a Latin word, really means the strengthener, one who, by his words, encourages another, arousing in him the spirit of bravery or courage. We often use the word comfort in such a different sense that it is well to notice its true significance. We speak of the comforts of life or of home, even meaning its luxuries. But luxuries have an enervating rather than a stimulating effect upon us, whereas the derivation of the word 107 -^ ^gtrb ^^urgbag in &ent> ** comfort," signifies that which strengthens us, not that which enervates us. The Holy Ghost ministers to us in our sorrows, bringing to us consolations of grace, and He does this chiefly in three ways : — First, He enlightens our intellect, enabling us to see the true end and purpose of sorrow and adversity, that by it God's Will is fulfilled in us, and that through adversity the various faculties of the soul are developed and character is moulded and formed for eternity. It was this illumination of his intellect by the Holy Ghost, v^hich enabled S. Paul to say, " Our light affliction, which is but for a moment, worketh for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory."* Then again the Holy Spirit strengthens our will by His grace, enabling us to endure our trials with patience, and teaching us the blessedness of this endurance according to the words of S. James, "Blessed is the man that endureth temptation; for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love Him."f We must remember S. Paul's words, that " God is faithful, Who will not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able ; but will with the temptation make the way to escape, * I Cor. iv. 17. t •^- Jiinics i. 12, 108 €^e Comforter . ^ that ye may be able to bear it""*^ The way to escape, of which he speaks, is evidently not escape from the trial, but from failure under trial ; for the purpose for which this way of escape is given is that we may be able to bear the trial, that is, that we may be strong to endure patiently whatever testing God sends us. It is not getting rid of difficulties which perfects us in Christian life and character ; but patient endurance of them, nay, even joyful endurance ; because we realise the greatness of the work which they are intended to effect in us. As S. James says, " Count it all joy when ye fall into divers temptations ; knowing this, that the trying of your faith worketh patience. But let patience have her perfect work, that ye may be perfect and entire, wanting nothing."f And, lastly, the Holy Ghost kindles our affec- tions with love for God, so that we not merely endure our adversities and bear our cross, because we see that they are the means by which character is formed, and the latent possibilities of the soul developed ; but because we love and trust God Who has sent them, and because we desire to show that love by accepting with trustful patience, whatever of affliction or adversity * I Cor. X. 13. f St. James i. 2-4. 109 God wills us to bear. Thus the Christian endures his sufferings, not in a mere spirit of stoical courage, but with loving trustfulness, regarding them not as a mark of God's displeasure, but rather of God's love. For it is revealed, " Whom the Lord loveth. He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth."* What true consolation there is in the thought that the Holy Spirit is always with us in our infirmities, strengthening us to bear our trials, teaching us to love the cross, encouraging us to persevere under adversity, until it has done its work in us, and God in His good providence removes it. * Hebrews xii. 6. IIO XV. e^trb f rtbag in &ent. THE SPIRIT OF TRUTH. S. John xiv. i6, 17. "And I will pray the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you for ever. Even the Spirit of Truth ; Whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth Him not, neither knoweth Him : but ye know Him ; for He dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." HE second title by which our Blessed Lord describes the Holy Ghost in this passage is " The Spirit of Truth," and this title implies the distinct personality and true divinity of the Holy Ghost. " The Spirit of Truth." What does this mean ? The Holy Ghost is the Spirit of Christ, Who is the Truth, and He is to guide Christ's children into all truth, as we are told in the next chapter.* * S. John XV. 26. Ill -^ tf^iti Sribag in &eni All truth is contained in the " deposit " of the Day of Pentecost. This was given to the Church at Pentecost potentially, and is the deposit over which S. Paul exhorts S. Timothy to keep guard.* And this deposit was '' the faith once for all delivered unto the saints," for which S. Jude, in his Epistle, exhorts us earnestly to contend.j- While we must realise the perfection of this Pentecostal gift, that it contained in the germ all truth ; so that there can be no new doctrines of the faith, we must also remember that it is the office of the Holy Ghost to unfold this truth according to the needs of different ages. This unfolding, or development of the truth, is the special function of the Holy Ghost as the Spirit of Truth. Thus He supplies the wants of every age, bringing home to the mind of the Church truth which was contained in the revela- tion of Pentecost, truth which is enshrined in the words of Holy Scripture, but which has often remained unnoticed or imperfectly comprehended by the Church, until some need for it has arisen. Then the Holy Ghost has supplied that need by showing to the Church, not new truth, but some aspect of the original deposit which met the exigencies of the times. This, which we may see again and * Cf. \ S. Timothy vi. 20. f Cf. S. Jude 3. 112 e^e ^pitit of ttut^. ^ again in Church history, is our assurance, that in all the difficulties of future ages, the Spirit of Truth will preserve the Church from error, and unfolding the Pentecostal revelation more and more, will guide the Church to the comprehension of all necessary truth. There are many doctrines of the Church which illustrate this work of the Spirit of Truth. Doctrines, which were implicitly contained in the original deposit, of the faith, but which were not explicitly defined until need for them arose in the Church. Such, for instance, are the doctrines of the Holy Trinity, and of the Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ. These are contained in Holy Scripture. They were implicitly held by the Apostolic Church. And yet we find that writers of the second and third centuries treat of them vaguely, and some- times even inaccurately. But, when in the fourth and fifth centuries heretics arose who denied these doctrines, then the Church, under the guidance of the Holy Ghost in her ecumenical councils, defined accurately what was the truth, and gave us the Nicene and Athanasian Creeds, the former by conciliar action, the latter by natural growth, but both under the direct guidance of the Holy Ghost, Who is the Spirit of Truth. 113 I There are many other doctrines which have been unfolded from time to time ; but we must bear in mind that every doctrine in its full growth is identical with the original revelation of the Day of Pentecost. Some persons have thought on this account that the doctrines of the Church have changed, but we must remember that there is a change which destroys, and a change which perfects, the identity of things. For instance, all growth is change, yet the oak of the forest has perfect identity with the acorn from which it sprang, and the change of ages, which has passed upon it, perfects its identity by unfolding its stateliness, and beauty, and strength. On the other hand all decay is change. When the branches of the oak droop, when the tree dies and falls into the dust, this stage is corruption. By this rule we may test the doctrines of the Church in comparison with those of the heretics. For instance, as we have shown, wc may trace this growth in the expression of the doctrine of the Holy Trinity from the Baptismal formula to the Nicene and Athanasian Creeds. This is growth, but absolute identity. So we may follow the doctrine of the Incarnation from the formula, " The Word became Flesh,"* to the full definitions * S, John i. 49. 114 t^t ^pixii of txui^. -^ of the ecumenical councils against Arians, Apollinarians, Nestorians, and Eutychians. So, too, with the doctrine of the Blessed Sacrament. Here again we have growth but identity. If we test the same doctrines among schismatics and heretics, we find the doctrine of the Holy Trinity represented by a series of heresies, from Sabellius to Socinus, or we may trace the progress of the perversion of the doctrine of the Incarnation from Nestorius to Strauss, or of the Holy Eucharist from Luther to Zwinglius. Here is change indeed, but change in which identity is lost. The oak has mouldered and fallen to the ground. That this is the teaching not of the Church alone, but also of Holy Scripture, we shall see if we read carefully the second chapter of the First Epistle of S, John. " But ye have an unction from the Holy One, and ye know all things. I have not written unto you because ye know not the truth, but because ye know it, and that no lie is of the truth . . . But the anointing which ye have received of Him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you : but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in Him."* * I S. John ii. 20, 21, and 27, •^^^ g^irb f rtbag in feent. In these words, S. John, writing to the Church at the end of the first century, affirms : (i) That it had already received the unction of the Spirit of Truth, and that, therefore, its members had no need to seek for knowledge elsewhere, because this unction enabled them to know all things ; for it was the unction of the Holy Spirit. (2) That they had no need of human teachers : " Ye need not that any man teach you." (3) That this unction was absolute truth, that it is no lie ; that is, it is not mixed with any falsehood, error, or doubt. This unction rested first on our great High Priest, Jesus Christ, the Head of the Church, and from Him descends upon His Body which is the Church, and goes " down to the skirts of His clothing," that is, to the members who abide in the Church. In regard to the character of the presence of the Holy Spirit in the Church, our Lord in this passage teaches us three things : (i) " He shall abide with you for ever." Christ's historical presence might at that time be measured by hours, He was soon to leave them ; at the longest, from the beginning of His ministry, it was measured only by years. But the Holy Ghost comes that He may abide with the Church 116 t^e ^ytrtt of trui^. «•»• for ever. This is not a transient presence, but a continual presence, preserving the Church from all error, guiding her into all truth. (2) It is, however, a presence which the world cannot apprehend : *' Whom the world cannot receive because it seeth Him not neither knoweth Him." With the world, lack of the capacity of sight made reception of the Holy Ghost impossible ; with the disciples, on the other hand, His presence brought knowledge which gave them greater power of reception of the Holy Spirit. For Christ goes on to say : " But ye know Him : for He dwelleth with you and shall be in you." We may ask how they had come to know the Holy Ghost when this was apparently the first time they had heard of Him. They had come to know Him through Christ, for in Christ the Spirit was always truly present, though not in His characteristic manifestation ; just as Christ now is ever present with His Church through the operation of the Holy Spirit. The doctrine of the Circumincession teaches us that where any one Person of the Holy Trinity is, there the Others are also. That whatever any one Person of the Holy Trinity does the Others share in that action. So the Holy Spirit was in Christ when Christ was in the world, just as Christ is 117 '^§ ^^irb :§'ribag in kcnt. present now through the operations of the Holy Spirit. (3) " Dwelleth with you, and shall be in you." " Dwelleth with you " {nap' vfxiv fxevei) might be nnore accurately rendered, " abideth by your side." And in these words we have brought before us an important theological doctrine. Before Pentecost the Holy Ghost was abiding close to them, as it were by their side, for He was the Spirit of Christ. But there was no indwelling of the Holy Ghost in man until Pentecost. We observe that our Lord, speaking of the Holy Ghost, says to the disciples, He abideth by your side (that is, before Pentecost), but He adds, " And He shall be in you," that is, in the near future, after Pentecost. In the Old Testament the Holy Ghost was God's Agent, as He is now ; but He worked in a different way. " He spake by the Prophets " the Creed tells us, but He did not dwell in them. His action upon them and upon others was but transient. Now in the Church and in the Christian soul it is permanent ; there is an abiding presence. He is given to us that He may abide with us for ever. 118 XVI. Z^ith ^aturbag in SLtni. CHRISrS COMING THROUGH THE HOLY GHOST. S. John xiv. 18-20. " I will not leave you comfortless : I will come to you. Yet a little while, and the world seeth Me no more ; but ye see Me : because I live, ye shall live also. At that day ye shall know that I am in My Father, and ye in Me, and I in you. He that hath My command- ments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth Me : and he that loveth Me shall be loved of My Father, and I will love him, and will manifest Myself to him. ' ' THIRD cause of consolation which our Lord sets before His disciples in this chapter is that after His departure, and through the gift of the Holy Ghost, He Himself will come to His disciples in a union more intimate than the fellowship which they had enjoyed with Him in His life on earth. He says, " I will not leave 119 ^^ i^ixi ^afurbdg in &cnt. you comfortless : I will come to you." The word translated "comfortless" (dpcpavovs) is really "orphans." '• I will not leave you orphans." The very word which describes their sorrow confirms their son- ship. When He departs for a brief space they will be like orphans. But even this shows their true relation to Christ, that they are His children, and He promises, " I will not leave you orphans : I will come to you : " or as we should read it, "I am coming to you," for the verb {^px^f^^O is in the present tense, not in the future. " I am continually coming to you and to the Church in all the work of the Holy Ghost ; " for all the great operations of the Holy Spirit in the Church are but the energies of the living and reigning Lord Jesus Christ, Who comes to us also as individuals through the work of the Holy Ghost in our own .souls. In how many ways does our Blessed Lord come to us through the work of the Holy Ghost in us ? He comes to us in the hour of prayer : we not only pray in His Name, that is through His merits, but with Him, in the realisation of His great intercession at the right hand of the Father. He comes to us at the time of meditation, when we are pondering upon the words in the Holy Gospel, which depict some scene in His life, or record His teaching. The sacred page glows under the illumination of the Hcjly Ghost, and 120 C^rtefe Coming. ^^ the actions and utterances of our Lord come to us with greater power probably than they exercised over the Apostles who heard them, but had not the Holy Spirit to bring them home to their souls. He comes to us at the moment of temptation to help us by His grace to resist and to conquer — He Who once " was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin."* He comes to us in the Holy Communion to give us strength to bear the burdens of life, to do the work to which we are called, to guide us in our difficulties that we may not only rejoice in our union with Him, but in the power of His grace may fulfil God's purposes for us, meeting with courage the obstacles which the world puts in our way. He comes to us in our joys to show His interest in us. He comes to us in our sorrows to tell us of His sympathy for us. He comes to us in the days of sickness to teach us to bear with patience the discipline of ill health, and to unite our little sufferings to the great pains of His Passion. Lastly, He comes to us in the hour of death to strengthen us for the last great struggle. If David could say, "Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil : for Thou art * Heb. iv. 15. 121 with me ; Thy rod and Thy staff they comfort me/"'' how much more can we make these words our own as we pass through the valley of the shadow leaning upon our Beloved. As He has come to us in all the various vicissitudes of our life here, so He will take us to be with Him in that glorious life hereafter, where, if we have been faithful, we shall learn that our light affliction in this world has worked for us a far more exceeding and eternal weight of glory in the world beyond, in heaven itself. "Yet a little while, and the world seeth Me no more ; but ye see Me : because I live ye shall live also." The world was to behold Him but a little while longer, for its followers deprived themselves of the power of seeing Him by their own act when they crucified Him. But even while they still behold Him, they only behold Him with that outward vision which could see but His natural life. His disciples, however, had another kind of vision, so that, although His death was to remove Him from their natural sight, it did not interfere with that spiritual vision through which they received mani- festations of Himself, and, indeed, after Pentecost this power of spiritual vision, by which they received revelations of Christ, was to be immensely increased. " The world seeth Me no more ; but ye see Me." * Psalm xxiii. 4. 122 C^txBfB Coming, ^ Ye see Me always. But He promises more than this : " Because I live, ye shall live also." Fellow- ship with Christ involved not only sig-k^ but /z/e. Not only were they to receive revelations of Christ, but they were so to be made one with Christ through Baptism, so that, with S. Paul, they could say, '' I live ; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me."* And this incorporation is the work of the Holy Ghost. Made one with Christ in Baptism, that union grows and increases, as we feed upon Christ through medi- tation upon His words, and in the Holy Eucharist receive the very Body and Blood of Christ, so that we are able to live by His life. " At that day ye shall know that I am in My Father, and ye in Me, and I in you." " At that day." At what day ? The day in which the new revelation is realised : the day which began at Pentecost, and lasts for the Church until Christ's return. But for the individual soul it is the day in which we realise the fulness of our fellowship with Christ through the operation of the Holy Ghost ; it is the day of our intensest joy, the day of our spiritual awakening, the day when we realise we are Christ's, not merely in name, but in deed, the day in which we realise that we live, and yet not we, but Christ liveth in us. * Gal. ii. 20. 123 ^^ C^trb gaturbgg in &cnt "At that day ye shall know that I am in the Father." Then should they apprehend Christ's union with Him Who is not only t/ie Father, but His Father. That is to say, they should then realise the true relation of Christ to God the Father, and their relation to the Father through their union with Christ This is what S. Paul means when he says, " For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God. For ye have not received the Spirit of bondage again to fear ; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: and if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ."* We are children of God, not only by creation, as all the heathen are God's children, but we are children by adoption, that is, God is our Father because He is the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, and because we are incorporated into His Body and live with His Life. " At that day ye shall know that I am in My Father, and ye in Me, and I in you." So we are taught that in order to know the Father, in order to see the Father (as S. Philip asked to see Him), we must have communion with Jesus Christ in * Rom. viii. 14-18. 124 C^mf 6 Coming. ^ His Humanity. But, on the other hand, in order to have the fullest and most intimate union with this Humanity, we must realise its exaltation into God, for only as Christ is in the Father is He able to be with us and in us, through the operation of the Holy Spirit. " He that hath My commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth Me : and he that loveth Me shall be loved of My Father, and I will love him, and will manifest Myself to him." This verse must be compared with the fifteenth verse, of which it is the converse, " If ye love Me, ye will keep My commandments." There obedience is shown to be the consequence of love : '' If ye love Me, ye will keep My commandments." Here obedience is shown to be the evidence of love : " He that hath My commandments and keepeth them, he it is that loveth Me." But more, " and he that loveth Me shall be loved of My Father," not merely in the sense and in the degree in which God loves the world at large, but in a peculiar and individual degree, as the father loves the child who is specially dear to him because he fulfils all his purposes and satisfies all his hopes. In other words, we shall be loved of the Father because we love Christ, Who is the superlative object of the Father's affection, the only begotten 125 ^ ^^irb ^aturbag in SLcni. Son of God, and this love for Christ we prove by our obedience to His teachings. But there is yet more, " And I will love him, and will manifest Myself to him." The word "manifest" in this verse is emphatic and signifies a close revelation of Christ's Person. " He that loveth Me, shall be loved of My Father : and I will love him, and will manifest Myself to him." The word " manifest " implies that our Lord will make clear to those who love Him with this perfect love, His nature and character, in a union so intimate that it can only exist in the soul which has given itself up altogether to the love of Christ. 126 XVII. €^trb (tttonbdg in Sitnt THE QUESTION OF S. JUDE. S. John xiv. 22-24. "Judas saith unto Him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that Thou wilt manifest Thyself unto us, and not unto the world? Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love Me, he will keep My words : and My Father will love him, and We will come unto him, and make Our abode with him. He that lovcth Me not keepeth not My sayings : and the word which ye hear is not Mine, but the Father's which sent Me." UDAS said unto Him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that Thou wilt manifest Thyself unto us, and not unto the world ? " This Judas is the apostle who is brought before us in the lists of the apostles given by S. Matthew and S. Mark* under the name of Thaddaeus, and in that * S. Matt. X. 3. S. Mark iii. 18. 127 ^ tf^ixi) (Utonbag in S^tnt jriven by S. Luke as Judas the son (not the brother) of James.* We know absolutely nothing about him except that he asked this question of our Lord. Some have identified him with the S. Jude who wrote the Epistle. But that Judas was a brother not a son of James, and was one of our Lord's '* brethren ; " moreover it is extremely doubtful, or rather im- probable, that any of our Lord's brethren were numbered among the twelve Apostles. We are so distinctly told in the Gospels " neither did His brethren believe in Him,"t that it seems impossible to suppose that they could have been among the Apostles. Since we know nothing about this S. Jude, except that he asked this question of our Lord, we are not able, as in the case of S. Peter and S. Thomas and S. Philip, to investigate his character and spiritual development. He interrupts our Lord with a fourth question, and, as in the previous questions, Christ's answer clears up certain difficulties. S. Peter had asked, '' Why cannot I follow Thee now ? " and Christ had shown that none can follow Him into His Kingdom in Heaven until they have been prepared for it by following Him in obedience and suffering in His * S. Luke vi. i6. Our version is wrong in inserting "brother" in this place. t S. John vii. 5. Cj. also S. Mark iii. 21. 128 t^c ^uegtion of ^> %xibe. ^ Kingdom on earth. S. Thomas had asked, " We know not whither Thou goest ; and how can we know the way ? " and Jesus had revealed that He Himself was the Way : " No man cometh to the Father but by Me." " I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life." S. Philip had said, " Show us the Father, and it sufficeth us," and our Lord had replied to him : " He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father," and then had gone on to show him how He Himself revealed the Father. Now another disciple, S. Jude, asks a further question. " How is it that Thou wilt manifest Thyself unto us, and not unto the world ? " The clause translated " how is it," etc. (W yeyovev) ought to be, " What has happened that Thou wilt manifest Thyself unto us, and not unto the world ? What has happened to change Thy plans ? Surely as Messiah Thou wouldest reveal Thy glory publicly to the world. For this the Jewish nation has long hoped. What then has happened to cause Thee to change these plans and to tell us that Thou art about to limit the revelation of Thy glory to us, Thy disciples ? " This is the idea which the question of S. Jude expresses, and we shall remember that a similar idea is contained in the words of His brethren to our Lord at an earlier period of His ministry, when they said to Him, " Depart hence, and go into Judaea, that Thy 129 K ^ i^ix'b (tttonbctg in Si,cnt. disciples also may see the works that Thou doest. For there is no man that doeth anything in secret, and he himself seeketh to be known openly. If Thou do these things show Thyself to the world."* As is so often the case, our Lord's reply does not appear to be a direct answer to the question, although, if we study it carefully, we shall find that it is more than an answer, in that it indicates the true cause why Christ did not manifest His Messiahship at that time to the world. The Jews were expecting a political Messiah, who should deliver them from foreign foes, from their Roman masters, and should make the nation glorious as it was in the time of Solomon, or rather, more glorious than it had ever been. There is little doubt that most of the Apostles shared in this expectation in spite of many warning utterances of Christ. Even after His resurrection we find that they asked Him, " Lord, wilt Thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel ?"t They looked for the setting up of a temporal kingdom of great power and glory, and it was not until they had been enlightened by the gift of the Holy Ghost at Pentecost that they were able to understand that Christ's kingdom was not of this world, was not a temporal kingdom amongst the kingdoms of the earth, but was a ♦ S. Juhn vii. 3, 4. t Acts i, 6. 130 t^c <£^uegtton of g> gube. ^ universal kingdom over men's minds and souls, a spiritual kingdom, the kingdom of truth and righteousness. But let us examine our Lord's answer, for it contains a very important declaration of the law of the progress of God's revelation to man. We see first the condition of this revelation, that it depends upon obedience resting upon personal love, and then the mode of this revelation, which is shown to be the operation of the Holy Ghost. For in verse twenty- six our Lord goes on to speak of the Holy Ghost, Who was to bring all things to their remembrance. To this is added a recapitulation of Christ's work for His people, both in Heaven and earth, with which the chapter concludes. ''Jesus answered and said unto him, if a man love Me, he will keep My words ; and My Father will love him, and We will come unto him, and make Our abode with Him." The first clause is practically a repetition of verse fifteen, " If ye love Me, ye will keep My commandments." If a man love Me, he will keep My zuord, not words, for here the word referred to is the Gospel, containing, as it does, Christ's own commands. But to this He adds, not as in verse eighteen, " I will come to you" but " We will come," My Father and I. Thus implying, of course. His true divinity. 131 '^ Z^it'b (Blonbdg in iLCnt, " We will come to him and make Our abode with him." Here the thought carries us back to the first verse. " In My Father's house are many mansions." We have already noticed that the word ftoi"?, trans- lated " mansions," occurs only twice in the New Testament, both times in this chapter — in the first verse and in the present verse. '* For We will make Our abode with him" is, if we are to retain the same translation of f ovj;, " We will make our inansion with him." Surely this introduces us to one of the deepest mysteries of Christian experience. Not only has Christ gone to prepare a place for us in the many mansions of His Father's house, but if we, through love and obedience, prepare a place for God in our souls, He will come and take up His abode with us. This verse is paralleled by the passage in the Epistle to the Church of Laodicea : " Behold, I stand at the door, and knock : if any man hear My voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and sup with him."- It is comparatively easy for us to conceive of Christ preparing a place for us in Heaven, but now He reveals to us that we need not wait for this, that if we will but prepare our hearts, God the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit will come and make Their * Rev. iii. 20. 132 tU iX^CBtion of g> gube, ^ abode in us ; so that we can have Heaven within us with all its joys, even though we are surrounded by the sorrows and struggles of the life of this world. But this wonderful union of the soul with God, which is the climax of our Lord's revelation, has its condition. We must not forget it. The condition is obedience which springs from personal love. " If a man love Me, he will keep My words : and My Father will love him, and We will come unto him, and make Our abode with him." The capacity to receive Christ's revelation and the capacity to possess God's presence in the soul depends upon this loving obedience. Therefore, our Lord goes on to say, " He that loveth Me not, keepeth not My sayings ; and the word which ye hear is not Mine, but the Father's Which sent Me." This is the real answer to S. Jude's question, " What has happened that Thou wilt manifest Thyself unto us, and not unto the world ? " That which had happened was this, that the love of the disciples rendered them, even imperfect as they were — rendered t/ie7n capable of receiving Christ's revelation ; while the lack of love on the part of the world rendered the world incapable of receiving it. The reason that Christ would manifest His glory to the disciples and not to the world, was that the world 133 ^^ tf^ix'b (Blonbag in £enf. had no eyes to see, no capacity to receive it, and the want of sight and the want of capacity was to be traced back to the lack of love. Thus we are told that disobedience to Christ's words (that is, to the constituent parts of His one word, the Gospel) is, in fact, disobedience to God, manifesting Himself under the aspect of Love. There are some, alas, who reject Christ's words, and yet profess to believe in God. Those, for instance, whom we call Unitarians. If we were to ask them what was their conception of God, they would probably reply, " God is Love," and yet they reject the one and only manifestation of perfect love in Jesus Christ, which the world has ever seen. When our Lord says, " He that loveth Me not, keepeth not My sayings : and the words which ye hear are not Mine, but the Father's, Which sent Me." He shows that those who love Him not, and keep not His commandments, cannot receive the full revelation of the Father — that in rejecting Christ's words, they are really rejecting God, manifested under His attribute of Love. 134 XVIII. CHRISrS LEGACY TO HIS DISCIPLES. S. John xiv. 25-27. " These things have I spoken unto you, bemg yet present with you. But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whonr. the Fathei will 5.-end in My name. He shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Peace I leave with you, My peace I give unto you : not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid." N the last section our Lord revealed the condition on which the reception of revelation depends — obedience resting upon personal love, without which the capacity to receive revelation cannot exist. Now we are told of the mode of revelation. It is by the operation of the Holy Ghost, and in regard to this operation we 135 •0^^ t^ix'b ^uesbdg in Si^cni, are taught four things, (i) That the Holy GhoFt is sent by the Father. (2) That He comes in Christ's name, character, and power. (3) That He comes to teach us all things ; and (4) that Ke is to bring to our remembrance and to make clear to our understanding all that Christ taught His disciples. "These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you." " These things " refer to the consolations given by our Lord to His disciples in the previous part of the chapter, and they are put in antithesis to the " all things " which the Holy Ghost was to teach them. The earthiy teaching of Christ was limited by the circumstances under which it was given, especially by the unenlightened character of the disciples before Pentecost. This teaching of Christ, however, was to be completed by being filled out and developed by the Holy Ghost in the Church. " But the Comforter, Which is the Holy Ghost." This is the only place in the Gospel in which we have the full emphatic title " the Holy Ghost." In our Bible we find the title several times in the Synoptic Gospels,"*^ but the form in the original Greek is quite different. There it is, nuevfia "lyiou, * S. Malt. i. 18, 20; iii. 11 ; S. Mark i. 8 ; S. Luke iii. 16; S. John i. 3^. 136 C^tiBf 6 £egacg fo ^xb ©iBctpfeB. ^ without the article. Whereas here it is, t6 nvevfia t6 ayiov, signifying the Spirit, Which is the Holy Ghost. Our Lord in this passage, and again in the thirteenth verse of the sixteenth chapter, speaks of the Holy Ghost as the Teacher and Guide, Who is to lead them into all truth. As the latter passage is somewhat fuller in its treatment of this aspect of the work of the Holy Spirit, we shall pass over the present verse and consider it when we come to treat of the parallel passage. " Peace I leave with you, My peace I give unto you ; not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid." This is our Lord's solemn farewell and last legacy to His disciples. " Peace I leave with you, My peace I give unto you." And what sort of peace is tliis, of which our Lord speaks as I/z's peace, and which He contrasts with the world's peace. The peace which He gives, His own peace, is the result of struggle endured and victory won. The world's peace, on the other hand, is generally the result of a compromise or truce with evil. The world's peace is the absence of struggle, the shrinking from, rather than the meeting and over- coming of difficulties. " My peace I give unto you." It will not save you, our Lord would tell us, from struggle and persecution and sorrow, but it is an 137 *^ ^^^y^ ^ue abag in &ent. interior peace which the world cannot give, and, thank God, cannot take away — a peace which is the result of the presence of the Prince of Peace within your souls. Our Blessed Lord once told His Apostles of quite another sort of peace ; for we read that He said to them, " When a strong man armed keepeth his palace, his goods are in peace."* The " strong man " in this passage is, of course, the Devil, his goods are the souls of men, and captivity to him is described as a sort of peace, the peace of the slave who has abandoned all hope of liberty and has accepted a degrading bondage. This is the peace of the world, the result of a compromise with evil, of a truce with the Devil, by which he is allowed to retain possession, or at least an abiding-place, in the soul of man. But the peace of which our Lord speaks as His legacy to His disciples is the very opposite to this. " But (Christ goes on to say) when a stronger than he shall come upon him, and overcome him, he taketh from him all his armour wherein he trusted, and divideth his spoils." The "stronger" is Christ, Who sets free the captives of Satan, and, if they will, takes up His abode in their souls. This peace, as we have said, will not secure thcni any exemption * .S. Luke xi. 21. 138 Cgrtef B feegacg to ^ jb of the verb " loved " (vy<^7rr]aa). It is an aorist, and therefore points to some distinct act of love, and that act is shown to be the supreme act of love by which Christ laid down His life for the world, for He says, " Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." And yet our Lord's act was even greater than this, for He laid down His life not only for His friends, but for His enemies, for those who murdered Him. And even those whom He honoured by the name of friends, how poorly they showed their friendship, for one betrayed Him, another denied Him, and all forsook Him in His hour of adversity. He teaches us here that the measure of love is the sacrifice of life. He offered up His life for us upon the Cross through death, and if we are to love the brethren as He commands, we must offer up our life, not through death but through loving service. S. John develops this thought very beautifully in his first Epistle, w^here he says, ''Hereby perceive we the love of God, because He laid down His life for us : and we ought to lay down our lives for the brethren. But whoso hath this world's good, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him ? "* * I S. John iii. i6, 17. 192 t^c SyJenbg of C^mt> ^ There is a legend that in extreme old age S. John confined his preaching to his flock at Ephesus to one text — " Little children, love one another." Whether the legend is true or not there can be no doubt that his Epistle is but the development of that text, and that he learnt this sublime doctrine from the last discourses of his divine Master. There is a very striking play upon the words translated " life " and " good " in the Greek of the above passage, which is lost in our translation. In the original both words mean life, but in a different sense. The first (^vxn) signifies that physical life which S. John says we ought, if need be, to lay down for the brethren. The second (/Stos-) means the life which we live in this world, the life which is made up of what we say and do. This is the word we use when we describe the history of a man's life under the term "biography." S. John says we ought to lay down our very /z/e for the brethren, and yet too often we grudge to spend our means in his service. He implies that there may be times when the actual sacrifice of life for others become a duty ; the soldier realises this when he dies for his country. This may be exceptional, but for all of us, he says, as opportunity offers, there must be a readiness to employ time and means and strength in our neighbour's service. 193 O *' Ye are My friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you. Henceforth I call you not servants ; for the servant knoweth not what his lord doeth : but I have called you friends ; for all things that I have heard of My Father I have made known unto you." How precious is the privilege of friendship with one of the world's great men ! How much more precious to be a friend of Jesus Christ ! a friend of God ! One man stands out upon the pages of Old Testament history who won that title, Abraham the friend of God.''' But all who are the disciples of Jesus Christ and show forth the evidence of love by obedience are His friends ; for He says, " Ye are My friends, if ye do whatsoever I command you. Henceforth I call you not servants." Literally, we may render it, " No longer (ovKeri,) do I call you servants, that is slaves, but I call you friends (<^tXovs), that is objects of My love." The disciples of Christ, however, continued to call themselves His bondslaves. It is S. Paul's favourite word to describe his relation to Christ, and not only S. Paul, but all alike retain this title. And why? Because it is included in the higher title of friends. Because they were His friends they loved to remind themselves and others that friendship with Jesus * C/i 2 Chron. xx. 7 : Isaiah xli. 8 ; S. James ii. 23. 194 t^c ifrienbg of C^xi&t ^ Christ depends upon absolute obedience, upon the whole service of life. Christ had said, " Ye are My friends if ye do whatsoever I command you." Hence, while He also said, " No longer do I call you servants but friends," they went on styling themselves His bondslaves, and leaving it to Him to designate them by the nobler title of friends. The mere slave is an instrument only for perform- ing his lord's commands, but does not aspire to any knowledge of his lord's motives or purposes. He does what he is told without knowing the reason or the object of what he does. But the obedience of friends differs from servile obedience in this, that it is based on love and knowledge and sympathy. They obeyed because they loved Christ, because they knew Christ, because of their sympathy with His work, and, as He Himself points out, because He took them into His confidence and revealed to them the purposes of His work as His Father had revealed that work to Him. " The servant knoweth not what his lord doeth : but I have called you friends ; for all things that I have heard of My Father I have made known unto you " — not all the mysteries of the Father's counsels, but all that it was fitting that man should know, all that Christ as Man had heard of the divine purposes. These counsels, for the Apostles and for us, are contained in the Divine Revelation, 195 ^ Stft^ T^ebnegbag in &enf> and our work under the guidance of the Holy Ghost is so to study them that we may work for God intelligently, not merely as bondslaves but as the friends of Jesus Christ. Friendship implies privileges, but it involves also responsibilities. It would be difficult to exaggerate the privileges we have as the friends of God — the special revelations through the Holy Spirit in regard to the mysteries of our religion and to the purposes of God for us. But while we may dwell on these with thankfulness it may perhaps be even more helpful to us to consider the responsibilities which are involved in this relationship to Christ. The first responsibility is love, to love Christ and to manifest that love by obedience to His commands, and especially by such love of the brethren as He indicates when He says, " Love one another as I have loved you." Of this we have already treated ; we will pass, therefore, to the second condition demanded by friendship — loyalty. We must be loyal to Christ when others are disloyal, that is, we must be ready to confess Christ among those who show Him no allegiance. We must be prepared to proclaim ourselves His servants and His friends, when to do so will bring upon us ridicule or even persecution, and 196 t^c Snenbg of Christ ^ we must show our loyalty not only with our lips but in our lives, not only by proclaiming by words that we are friends of Jesus Christ, but by showing by our deeds our devotion to His services, by keeping His commandments, even when to do so involves the world's opposition. And lastly, we must remember that as friends of Jesus Christ His interests must be our interests. What are the interests of Jesus Christ in this world ? Perhaps they may be most briefly summed up as the interests of His Church, especially in missionary enterprise at home and abroad. How inconsistent it is of us to claim the title, friends of Christ, when we have no interest in the expansion of His kingdom upon earth. Everything that belongs to the well-being of Christ's Church ought to be of intensest interest to us. We should, therefore, read a great deal about the needs of the Church at home and abroad. We should strive by all means in our power to spread this information among others, to interest others in the Church's work, and to ask ourselves what we can do practically to further the Church's work. We should begin perhaps in our own house- hold, among our own friends. Could we help them to know more about the Church of Jesus 197 •»? ^ifi^ nX>ebne0bftg in &ent. Christ, to take more interest in her claims ? Then in our own parish. What do we know of its needs? Are we doing our best to supply them according to our own ability, whether that be great or small ? Are more workers needed in our parish, and is there something to be done which we could do? Then, further, the claims of our diocese, and of our own Com- munion. Are we really interested in Church news because the interests of Jesus Christ require that we should care for everything that pertains to the welfare of His kingdom ? Do we take as much interest in Church news as we do in the world's news, of what is going on in politics or literature or social life ? Yet further, we are members of the Church Catholic, and therefore ought to care deeply for all that affects the life of the whole body of Christians. We cannot work for every Com- munion, but we can pray, and especially pray that some day all may be one according to Christ's own prayer, that divisions may be healed, and misunderstandings removed, and that, with- out any sacrifice of truth, love may prevail and bring together those who are now separated though part of the same Body of Christ. Then there is missionary work amongst the 198 t^c Srtenb6 of C^xxBt ^ heathen. What an immense interest of Jesus Christ this is. Millions there are still to be converted to Christianity, millions who know nothing of the gospel of Jesus Christ, of the salvation He won for all men, of the means of grace by which man is enabled to conquer sin. This is perhaps the largest demand which friendship for Jesus Christ makes upon us, that we should make His interests our interests, the great interests of our lives. Let us examine how far we have failed in this and strive by His help to be more faith- ful in our friendship for the future. 199 XXVI. fift^ t^nxBU^ in feenf. THE LAW OF VOCATION. S. John xv. i6. "Ye have not chosen Me, but I have chosen you, and ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain : that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in My Name, He may give it you." HIS section of the fifteenth chapter closes with these wonderful words so full of en- couragement and consolation to us. The tenses of the verbs are aorists, not perfects, there- fore it should be rendered, " Ye did not choose Me, but I chose you." The Apostles did not choose Christ as their Master, He first chose them as His friends, and then He ordained them, that is, instituted them to a certain office and work as His apostles. 200 t^c &(Xro of (pocation. ^ In these words we are taught one of the most important lessons of Christian life — the principle of Vocation. Every Christian who thinks seriously has at some time or other asked with anxiety, " What is my vocation in life ? " This is especially a question for the youn^, and yet how often it is either ignored or misunderstood. Everyone has a vocation in life, and it is of the utmost importance that each one should strive first to know what his vocation is, and then to walk worthy of it. But what do we mean by vocation ? A very large number of persons probably mean the state of life which ^kej' choose as their business or profession, and they choose it probably with regard only to worldly success or worldly enjoyment. But surely this is not the meaning of vocation. Vocation is a state of life to which we are called by God, not one which we choose for ourselves. Of course we must realise that God reveals to us our vocation largely through His providence, that is, through the environment in which He has placed us. Parents' wishes, personal gifts and inclinations, all may be legitimate means of finding out what is God's work for us, if only we start with the realisation that we want to find out what is God's Will for us, and not merely to gratify our own ambitions. Surely this is what we are taught by our Lord's 201 words to His apostles, " Ye did not choose Me, but I chose you, and ordained you " — to be My apostles. Very likely they thought that in follow- ing Christ they had made the choice, and so in a sense they had ; for we can obey or disobey God's call, and in determining to obey we are choosing God. But before we can make that determination God must have chosen us, and spoken to our hearts through His preventing grace, thus enabling us to recognise His call, and to obey it. How few, even of those who grow up in Christian homes, are brought up to consider vocation from this point of view. They are asked what they would like to be, what they would like to do, and while recognising, as we have done, that inclination is often a factor in deciding vocation, yet prayer that we may know God's Will for us should have the first place, and the end we must have in view in finding out our vocation must not be only worldly success but rather God's glory. God has a work for me to do, and there is a state of life in which I can best do that work. I must ask earnestly in prayer that God will show me what that state of life is, I must not decide upon it merely with a view to worldly ambition. When we have in this way learnt what our vocation is, wc must walk worthy of it, as S. 202 t^c &(XW of (gocdfton. ^ Paul exhorts us,* and if at times we shrink from the responsibilities it involves, and are inclined to say that the work is too great for us, we have as our encouragement these words, " Ye did not choose Me, but I chose you, and ordained you" to this work. How great is the comfort through life of this revela- tion — if I have sought guidance in regard to my state in life, I need not afterwards fear that I have made a terrible mistake and that I am quite in the wrong place. There are many in this condition, but pro- bably in most instances it is because they chose their vocation quite irrespective of God's guidance. They did not seek from Him humbly and earnestly a manifestation of His Will, they did not ask Him, '' Lord, what wilt Thou have me to do .? " They only considered what they wished to do, what would gratify their inclinations or ambitions in life, and so they found out, when it was too late, that they had made a mistake — a mistake which perhaps could not be rectified, and which spoilt their lives. How different it is with those who have sought the guidance of God in the matter of vocation, and who can say, " I did not choose, but God called me to this work, and therefore, because He called me, He will give me the grace I need to accomplish it, the opportunities which are necessary for bringing it to a * Cf. Eph. iv. I. 203 *9 ftftg g^urobag in &e nt. successful issue — successful in that it will be the fulfilment of God's Will. We may observe that our Lord indicates four consequences of His choice and ordination. He says, " I ordained you, that ye should go and bring forth fruit, and that your fruit should remain : that whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in My Name, He may give it to you." First they are to go. This implies the taking up of an independent and definite work. They are not to drift about, as so many do, without any real purpose, any definite work in life. There is some- thing for each to do, and they are ordained that they may go and do it. If I do not know what my work is I ought to feel very anxious lest it should be my own fault that I do not know it, lest I should have shut my eyes to God's leading, closed my ears to the voice which would have guided me to the work which God ordained for me. Secondly, they are to bring forth fruit. This is a most important and precious revelation. If we arc doingf the work which God has called us to do, that work is certain to be fruitful. We have Christ's own promise that it shall be. People often labour with energy at a work of their own choosing, but it ends in failure ; because God's blessing does not rest upon it. But there can be 204 tU &aw of (gocafton, ^ no such thing as failure to one who is walking in the vocation to which God has called him, doing the work which God has given him.. We have a very striking illustration of this in the miraculous draught of fishes which preceded the call of S. Peter. We read* that after our Lord had been teaching from S. Peter's boat, He said unto him, " Launch out into the deep, and let down your nets for a draught. And Simon answering said unto Him, Master, we have toiled all the night : nevertheless at Thy word I will let down the net. And when they had done this they inclosed a great multitude of fishes: and their net brake." He had toiled all night and had taken nothing, but when he let down his net at the command of Jesus Christ, it was filled with fishes. There are many who toil all through the dark night of this life ard find at the end that they have taken nothing — nothing, that is, which will follow them into the world to come. Life has been wasted, its opportunities lost, its true work left undone ; because they have been working according to their own will, not accord- ing to the will of God. There are others whose lives do not seem to be particularly successful from this world's point of view, who * Cf. S. Luke V. I- 1 1. 205 -^ ^ift^ Z^uxBba^ in &cnt. when their net is drawn ashore at the last day will find it filled with fishes. Thirdly, their fruit is to remam, " that your fruit should remain." There are many men whose names are known all over the world, who, after years of enormous effort, have amassed an immense amount of this world's fruits in the shape of wealth or popularity or power, but when they come to die none of that fruit will remain to them. Think of the millionaire who by his wealth one day controls the little world in which he lives, the next day he dies and whose is that wealth ? It is no longer his, he cannot control one penny of it. He has not taken it with him. The fruit of all his labours is {^one to others, nothing perhaps remains to him except the remorse of lost opportunities, of an ill-spent life. But to those, on the other hand, whose work has been done for God, and under His guidance, our Lord promises that their fruit shall remain. Their works do follow them into the world beyond, into eternity, to be their joy in God's kingdom in heaven. Lastly, there is the promise, " That whatsoever ye shall ask of the Father in My Name, He may give it to you," the promise that in answer 206 t^c &(Xro of QOocdtion. ^>^ to prayer through Christ, all that is necessary for the fulfilment of vocation shall be given — wisdom to meet the difficulties of the work to which God has called us, strength to accomplish it, the grace of perseverance to the end. He who has called us will, in answer to our prayers, give us all that we need to enable us to obey His call and to do His work. We must briefly notice the bearing of these words upon the vocation of the Apostles. Christ assures them that He chose them, and why ? Surely, because He saw in each a special fit- ness for the apostolate. The apostles were of different temperaments, possessing different gifts, but each had that which was necessary to enable him to fulfil his vocation. One of the twelve was unfaithful to his vocation — Judas Iscariot — but his call was as true a call as was the vocation of the others, and from what we know of him, he seems to have possessed even greater natural gifts than his fellow apostles possessed. He was the only Judsean among them ; the others were all Galilean peasants and fishermen. He was probably the only educated man, and possibly was a man of some means. He may have made greater sacrifices of this world's position and goods than the 207 -^ ^ift^ S^^urebaj in SLtnt others made, when they obeyed Christ's call and followed Him as their Master. There is no reason to suppose that he was not quite in earnest when he took up the yoke of Christ. He had a besetting sin, but so had all, and when he enrolled himself in the apostolic band and accepted the poverty which was their lot, he doubtless thought that he would be free from temptation to his besetting sin, which was covetousness ; for inasmuch as following Christ involved poverty, he would have little temptation to covetousness. But because of his administrative ability he was chosen to bear the bag, to be the almoner of the apostolic college, and again had to handle money, and to face his besetting sin. With a renewal of temptation we may be sure grace was given him to enable him to overcome the temptation. But he first yielded to his besetting sin of covetousness — he became a thief ; and then apparently he lost his faith in Jesus Christ and lived untrue to his vocation. So he forfeited by his own act the apostolic office, and another S. Matthias, was raised up to do his work and to receive the reward, the crown that would have been his. Judas is an awful example — not to the godless, 208 t^c &(XKo of (goc(Xfton« ^ but to religious people ; the example of one who had a real call from Jesus Christ, who recognised his vocation and accepted it ; but because he did not walk worthy of it, because he was not faithful in persevering in it, he lost his vocation, and with it lost his soul. 309 XXVII. f iff^ f ribag in £ent. THE WORLD'S HATRED. S. John xv. 17-21. " These things I command you, that ye love one another. If the world hate you, ye know that it hated Me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own : but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted Me, they will also persecute you : if they have kept My saying, they will keep your's also. But all these things will they do unto you for My Name's sake." N the earlier part of the fifteenth chapter our Blessed Lord revealed to His disciples, under the image of the vine and its branches, the vital union which exists between Himself and the soul of the believer, pointing out, on the one hand, the consequences of the severance 210 of this union, and on the other the blessings of its continuance. In the former case He draws attention to the worthlessness of the branches, their unfruitfulness, and their destruction by fire ; in the latter He warns of the purging and pruning necessary that they may bring forth more abundant fruit, and promises three great privileges as the result of this union with Him — a special power in prayer, and the glorious titles of disciples and friends of Jesus Christ. At the seventeenth verse we are introduced to a new section, which extends to the seventh verse of the next chapter. In this section Christ tells of the consequences of His friend- ship as manifested in the world's treatment of those who love Him, and are His disciples and friends. He draws our attention to the dark side of the picture, and shows that in contrast to the joys and glories and privileges which pertain to those who love Him, there will be sorrows, trials, and persecutions, which arise from the world's hatred of Christ and His followers. The seventeenth verse is often regarded as summing up the last section, but it really belongs to the next, to which it forms an introduction. The antiphon is repeated, " These things I command you, that ye love one another," and in sharpest contrast is put the result of obedience, as seen in 211 ^ f tf<^ f ribdg in &eni the world's hatred of those who love God and love one another. " If the world hate you, ye know that it hated Me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love his own : but because ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." What does Christ mean here by the " world " (6 Koafios) ? He means humanity apart from grace, man apart from Christ, the natural man as distinguished from the supernatural. The world in which we live has its interests, its ambitions, its code of morals, its loves, and its hates. But our Blessed Lord describes it as diametrically opposed to Him, to His teaching, to His works, and to those who have enrolled them- selves as His disciples and friends. The world can love with a certain sort of affection, for He says, "If ye were of the world, the world would love his own." And the world can hate, and it hates those who are not its own, whose lives arc ;i continual reproach to it, and whose allegiance is given, not to its claims, but to Christ. The words of Christ in this passage imply that it is impossible to belong to the world and to belong to Him, for He says, " Because ye are not of the world, therefore the world hateth you." 212 He forewarns His disciples of the world's hate. He points out that it is only what they must expect, since it is but a repetition of the world's treatment of their Master. He shows that the immediate cause of this hatred will be their mutual love for one another, because that love testifies that they belong to Him, and also because this love witnesses against the world's supreme characteristic of utter selfishness, for the world's love is a selfish love. Our Lord says, " If ye were of the world, the world would love his own." If ye were of the world, deriving your life from the world, finding in its praises your reward, in its customs your enjoyment and pleasure, the world would recognise you as belonging to it, and so would love you — not with that spiritual love which is implied in the use of the verb dyanav, which signifies a love founded upon the worthiness of its object, and upon an appreciation of the character of the one we love. The word e<^tXet> used of the world's love, signifies natural love, the love of passion. "If ye were of the world, the world would love his own," and that not because of the worthiness of those who belong to the world, but often for the very opposite reason, because in everything they accept the world's low standard, and so fulfil the 213 ^ f ift^ fribdg in feenf. claims which the world makes upon them. In the clause, " the world would love his own," we may- notice the expression " his own " (r6 tBiov). It is neuter, and signifies not a person, but a quality. The world does not love them as persons, as individuals, it only cares for those qualities in them which belong to it, and especially that quality of selfishness, which is the special characteristic of worldliness. We may also observe that the fivefold repetition of the word " world " in this passage brings into very strong relief the antagonism that there must be between the world and those who love Christ. Christ goes on to say, " Remember the word that I said unto you, The servant is not greater than his lord. If they have persecuted Me, they will also persecute you : if they have kept My saying, they will keep yours also. But all these things will they do unto you for My Name's sake." " Remember the word that I said unto you." We find this saying also in S. Matthew.* Persecution, we are told, is to be expected. If we are Christ- like we must expect to suffer as Christ did, to be treated as Christ was treated. If we are nominal Christians, but not Christ-like, the world will probably let us alone. * S. Matt. X. 24. 214 e^e nrorf^B gatreb. £^ The thought by which our Lord would sustain His disciples under persecution is contained in the utter- ance, " These things will they do unto you for My Name's sake." All sufferings which you endure in the world because you are manifesting a Christ-like life are borne for Christ's sake. What a sustaining thought He had said of Himself, " Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends." Now He says to them, If ye love Me, ye must be ready to suffer for Me, and ye must recognise in your sufferings a glorious opportunity of showing your love. If in our time of trial we keep this thought steadfastly before us, that it is for Christ's sake that we endure the trial, it will rob our sufferings of all their bitterness and transmute them into glorious privileges. It was this thought which enabled the martyrs so gladly to suffer and die for Christ. With what transparent honesty our Lord puts before His disciples the consequences of following Him — not only in this passage, but again and again throughout the Gospels does He call upon everyone who comes to Him to count the cost before they take up His yoke. To the man who proclaimed, " Lord, I will follow Thee whithersoever Thou goest," He said, "Foxes have holes, birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man hath 215 ^ S^f^^ Sribdg in BLCnt. not where to lay His head."* How many times, too, He said to His disciples, " If any man will come after Me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross and follow Me/'f And, " Whosoever doth not bear his cross, and come after Me, cannot be My disciple."t Our Blessed Master will allow none to enrol them- selves under His banner before they realise what His service involves of suffering and self-denial. The reward, He tells them, is the greatest that the human heart can conceive of, but the journey to be traversed before the reward is won is by a narrow and strait and difficult path. Opposition must be encountered and persecution endured. They will go forth as disciples of love, and they will meet in return only hate. The world will hate them because they love Christ, and love one another. Christ says, " Remember the word that I said unto you." It ought to be a very real help to us in time of trouble to remember that our Master warned us to expect trial. S. Paul says, " There hath no temptation taken you but such as is common to man : but God is faithful, Who ^jjill not suffer you to be tempted above that ye are able ; but will with the temptation make the way to * S. Luke xix. 57, 58. t S. Mult. xvi. J4. % ^' ^-i''^^' '^'^■- -7- 216 escape, that ye may be able to bear it."* Trial, testing, is common to all men, necessary for all, and especially for the Christian, but with the trial God will always send the way of escape, the means of grace by using which we may be able — not to get rid of the temptation, but to bear it ; for it is by endurance of temptation that we win the crown of life.f The hatred of the world of which Christ forewarns His disciples was very definite in its manifestation, for we read of it first as shown by the Jews, and then after the fall of Jerusalem we find it in the various persecutions of Christians under the Roman Empire. Now the world has lost some of its powers of persecution, but it has not lost its hatred of all who are Christ's. The form of its manifestation is more civilised, but the spirit is the same. * I Cor. X, 13. -f Cf. S. James i. 12 ; 2 Timothy iv. 8. 217 XXVIII. THE WORLD'S IGNORANCE. S. John xv. 21-25. " But all these things will they do unto you for My Name's sake, because they know not Him that sent Me. If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin : but now they have no cloke for their sin. He that hateth Me hateth My Father also. If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin : but now have they both seen and hated both Me and My Father. But this cometh to pass, that the word might be fullilled that is written in their law, They hated me witliout a cause." E have seen that tlie immediate cause of the world's hatred is the spirit of love manifested in a Christ-like life, but our Lord also ascribes this hatred to another cause — ignorance, "because they know not Him that 'sent Me." All sin may be ultimately traced 218 t^c TJJorfb'B 3gnorance. i)c- to ignorance, as our Lord shows us, when He prays for His murderers, saying, " Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do."* Ignorance with regard to the intellect and per- version of the will are the two causes of sin, though ignorance is the primary cause. Christ, when weeping over Jerusalem, said, " If thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things which belong unto thy peace ! but now they are hid from thine eyes because thou knewest not the time of thy visitation."! Here He traces their rejection of His love to ignorance. On another occasion He said, " O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would notrx In this passage He points out that perversion of will prevented them from listening to His pleading with them. However, to confine ourselves to the passage under our consideration, we shall observe that Christ very distinctly traces the cause of the world's hatred and rejection of Him to ignorance. * S. Luke xxiii. 34. f Cf. S. Luke xix. 41-44. X S. !Matt.. xxiii. t^*]. 219 " They know not Him that sent Me." The Jews of our Lord's day knew a great deal about God and His revelation to men. It was an intensely religious age. The leaders of the nation held their positions by virtue of their religious profession. They were : Pharisees or Sadducees, Scribes, Elders or Priests ; and all these titles told either of their religious views or of their religious occupation. The services of the Temple had probably never been performed with greater splendour, and the Temple itself as restored by Herod had attained to its greatest magnificence. Then the study of the letter of Holy Scripture was pursued with painstaking industry and passionate devotion. It had reached its highest development ; there were volumes of traditional comments on the letter of Holy Scripture, but the spirit, alas, was neglected or forgotten. The Jews then knew about God, about the Father Who had sent Christ, but they did not know Him, they did not apprehend His character, His attributes of love and mercy and truth. The ignorance to which our Lord refers was not a theological but a moral ignorance. Theology was recognised as the very queen of sciences in those day, but, alas, it was divorced from practical life. 220 €U T37orfb*6 35ttorance. H- The positive enactments of Holy Scripture in regard to tithing, mint and anise and cummin* were strictly observed, and the ritual law in regard to the washing of pots and cups was rigidly enforced, but the weightier matters of the law, righteousness and truth and mercy, were sadly overlooked. " If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin : but now they have no cloke for their sin If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin, but now they have both seen and hated both Me and My Father." The complete parallelism of these two verses is very striking. " If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin." " If I had not done among them the works which none other man did, they had not had sin." In the first our Lord points to His teachings as a testimony to His Person and mission, in the second He points to His works ; and He shows that if the ignorance of those who persecuted Him had been the ignorance of those who had never come in contact with truth, it would have been excusable, but that it was ignorance persevered in in spite of the evidence of Christ's teachings and of His miracles and works of mercy. * S. Matt, xxiii. 23. 221 -o^ Stft^ ^gfutbag in &enf. Their ignorance was wilful ignorance, and there- fore it was sin, and sin which had no cloke, that is, no excuse. They had abundant evidence of the truth of Christ's claims, they even investigated some of the evidence, as in the case of the man born blind," but though they were constrained to admit the facts, they absolutely refused to acknowledge the inference which the facts suggested. " They wondered at the gracious words which proceeded out of the mouth of Christ, "-(• but they rejected His teachings. . They could not deny His many miracles of healing the sick and raising the dead, but they refused to acknowledge that He came from God. They shut their eyes to the truth ; they hated it, and as Christ says, in hating it, hated both Himself and His Father. This was the result of their sin, and their sin was the result of wilful ignorance. Darkness hates light, it cannot endure it, because light disperses and destroys darkness. Sin hates goodness, because goodness is a constant reproach to the sinner. Error hates truth, because error is of the Evil One and truth is of God. How clearly our Lord points out the difference between ignorance which is a mis- fortune, and that ignorance which is wilful, and therefore without excuse, we see this when He pleads * Cy. S. John ix. 13-34. t O^ ^- Luke iv. 22. 222 for His murderers, saying, " They know not what they do." Then again, Christ points to the warnings of the prophets. Their own Scriptures not only prophesied of the coming of the Messiah, but of His rejection, and of the hatred with which He would be met. " But this Cometh to pass, that the word might be fulfilled which is written in their law. They hated Me without a cause." The Jews had everything : the evidence of our Lord's words and of His miraculous works ; they had also the witness of their own Scriptures, but they would not believe, and therefore He holds them responsible for their unbelief There are many lessons which we may learn from this passage. What do we love ? Light or darkness, goodness or evil, error or truth ? Are we content with the theological knowledge of Christ, or do we strive to know Him as our Master and our Friend ? Some may say, " How can I know whether I am right, whether what I believe is truth } " The answer is not so difficult as it seems. We can know by the guiding of the Holy Ghost, Who is the Spirit of Truth, and of Whom our Lord tells us that He shall guide the Church into all truth. There are many theological opinions about which there may be different views, but the essential truth into which the Holy Ghost has guided the Church 223 §0^ iS^ft^ ^dtutbag in &enf. can without much difficulty be recognised because it is held and taught by every part of the Church. That parts of the Church may err in regard to theological opinion, is not inconsistent with God's promise. It is impossible that the whole Church can be led astray ; so that wherever we find a truth taught by every part of the Church we may be sure of its authority ; and we shall find upon investigation that this includes all essential truth, that the matters of theological speculation upon which different communions in the Church disagree do not touch the vital truths of the Christian creed. We must pray to be delivered from prejudice, and, claiming Christ's promise, we must ask the Holy Ghost to guide us into all truth, and to this end diligently study that truth which comes to us with the authority of the Holy Catholic Church. 224 XXIX. ^ift^ (Ittonbag in &cnt THE ADVOCATE AS CHRIST'S WITNESS. S. John xv. 26, 27. " But when the Comforter is come, Whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of truth, Which proceedeth from the Father, He shall testify of Me : And ye also shall bear witness, because ye have been with Me from the beginning." EFORE we proceed to a consideration of the special teaching of this passage — that the Comforter or Advocate is to bear witness to Christ — it will be well to examine carefully its theological bearing upon the doctrine of the Holy Ghost. We must first notice the emphatic use in the Greek of the personal pronouns, that they are not contained in the verb, but that a separate personal pronoun is employed in referring both to Christ and to the Holy Ghost. 225 Q -^ ^iftf^ (fflonbgg in &enf. In the clause, " When the Comforter is come Whom I will send unto you from the Father," our Lord uses the emphatic " I " (Eyf^), and its use involves a claim to divine power, to equality with the Father. For in a previous passage relating to the Holy Ghost Christ had said, " Whom the Father will send in My Name."* Now He says emphatically, " Whom / will send," claiming to do that which He had before ascribed to the Father. Again, in the clause " He shall testify of Me," the personal pronoun (cWvor) which is rendered "He" is masculine, but in the Greek the word for Spirit (nvlviia) is neuter, so that the concord in gender, between the pronoun and the noun to which it refers, is violated in order to bring out clearly the personality of the Holy Ghost. We must further notice the expression "which proceedeth from the Father." It will carry our thoughts at once to the article of our Creed con- cerning the Holy Ghost — " Who proceedeth from the Father and the Son ; " an article of faith which, in its wording rather than its essential doctrine, separates the Eastern Church from the rest of Christendom. The Holy Spirit proceeds eternally from the Father and the Son, not as from two origins, but * S. John xiv. 26. 226 as from one, not by two spirations, but by one spiration. He proceeds, therefore, by an act of the will ; and as we have no name for this procession suggested by what occurs in man, and as the act of intellect by which the Father generates the Son is virtually distinct from the act of will by which the Father with the Son breathes forth the Holy Spirit, the general word " spiration " (breathing) is used for this procession of the Holy Spirit. Since the Holy Ghost (like the Son) is not distinct in essence from the Father from Whom He proceeds, this procession is called " immanent procession," for in Theology the word procession signifies the origination of one thing from another, but where the thing originated is not really distinct in essence from the principle which originated it, the procession is termed " immanent procession." The Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father onljy as the Source, Fountain, or Beginning. He is the eternal love of the Father and the Son mutually breathed forth by them, and is, as it were, the bond of union in the Eternal Trinity. In the Creed, as set forth by the Council of Chalcedon, A.D. 451, the article to which we have referred reads, " Who proceedeth from the Father ; " the words, ** and the Son," having been added later and without conciliar authority. Hence they are 227 •»§ f ift3 (fflonbag in feent. rejected by the Eastern Church, which accuses the West of having; altered the Creed by interpolating these words. The point of agreement in regard to the doctrine of the procession is that both Churches hold that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father only as from the Source, Fountain, or Beginning, but that He proceeds through or by the Son. Althougli the words " from the Son " crept into the Creed without adequate authority, the West cannot surrender them, now that they have become part of her recognised theology, without seeming to throw doubt upon the doctrine which they teach — that the Holy Spirit proceeds from the Father and Son by mutual spiration, though from the Father only as the Source. But in its explanation of the manner of this procession the Western Theologians entirely accept the language of the Greek Fathers, that the Holy Ghost proceeds from the Father, through or by the Son, the difference therefore is one rather of words than of faith. We may further point out that there are two Missions of the Holy Ghost — His eternal Mission by which He proceeds from the Father and the Son in the eternal life of the Holy Trinity, and His temporal Mission by which He proceeds from the Father and the Son to accomplish His work in the world. The question may be asked to which of 228 these processions is our Lord referring in the passage under our consideration. "The Comforter . . . Whom I will send unto you from the Father, even the Spirit of Truth, Which proceedeth from the Father." There seems no doubt that Christ is referring to the temporal mission of the Holy Ghost. This is evident, first from the purpose of His Mission — to testify unto Christ in the world — and then also from the pronoun used in the phrase " from the Father" (Trapd). This pronoun signifies from the side of a person, not like dTro, from a source. With this explanation let us pass on to the con- sideration of the special function in the temporal Mission of the Holy Ghost to which our Lord draws attention — the work of witnessing to Christ. If we compare the twenty-sixth verse with that which precedes it, we shall see that the witness of the Holy Ghost is contrasted with the hatred of the world, which is the main subject of this section of our Lord's discourse. Christ had traced this hatred to ignorance of the Father.* He had further showm that this ignorance was inexcusable, because the Jews had the testimony of their own Scriptures and prophets, which bore witness to the Messiah. These Scriptures and prophecies He had Himself so fulfilled as to leave * C/. ver. 21. 229 -^ f tft^ ^ottbAg in &eni no doubt in the mind of an unprejudiced Jew that He was the Messiah. He now goes on to show that in the future the world should be still more without excuse, because the Holy Ghost should testify unto Him, which He has done through the marvellous works wrought in the Christian Church by His power. Not only did the miracles worked by the Apostles after the Day of Pentecost, through the agency of the Holy Ghost, bear witness to Him, but the world has before it a constant miracle in the existence of the Church of Christ as a perpetual testimony to the truth of His teachings and to the divinity of His Person. This testimony is not confined to the apostolic age, but in its fullest application is to be taken of the interpretation of Christ's life and work as given by the Holy Ghost through the teachings of the Church. Not only was the Holy Ghost to bear this witness unto the world, but they themselves were also to bear witness. That is, they were to testify to what they had seen and heard without them — to the objective facts of the life and teachings of their Master. And they were also to testify to that which they had experienced within them — to the subjective experiences of their own soul's life. The passage further points out their fitness to bear 230 this testimony because they had been with Christ from the beginning, and so were peculiarly com- petent to give evidence of all that He had said and done in His historic life on earth. This injunction is repeated by our Lord just before His Ascension into Heaven, when He says to them, "Ye shall receive power after that the Holy Ghost is come upon you, and ye shall be witnesses unto Me both in Jerusalem, and in all Judaea, and in Samaria, and unto the uttermost part of the earth."* This command is handed on by the Apostles to us, and no duty can be more binding on us than that of bearing witness to the world of the truth of Chris- tianity ; but the witness which we can bear is not so much to the objective facts of our Lord's life, as to its subjective power manifested in our own lives, enabling us to show forth in a world, which hates the light and loves darkness, the brightness of a Christ-like life. Our Blessed Lord in giving this command to His Apostles knew that it would be the most convincing evidence of the truth of His claims, that it would be the force by which the world should be won to Him. The evidence of the Apostles alone would have been powerless, but they were to bear witness in conjunc- tion with the witness of the Holy Ghost. So it is * Acts i. 8. 231 -9$ ftft^ (fflonbag in feeni now. It is not by the eloquence of preaching, nor the cogency of argument, it is not by the brilliancy of our learning or the attraction of worldly success that we are to win souls to Christ, but by the simple testimon}^ of Christian lives lived under the guidance of the Holy Ghost. 232 XXX. Stft^ 2;ue6b " Nevertheless, I tell you the truth ; It is expedient for you that I go away." In these words we have a great practical lesson. Our Lord does not hesitate to tell them the truth, when it is expedient for them to know that truth, even though that knowledge is to fill their heart with sorrow. How often we shrink from telling other people unpleasant truths, which we ought to tell them, because we are afraid of displeasing them, or of causing them pain. Again, ^ we do not like others to tell us unpleasant truths, because they hurt our vanity. But, alas, we are quite ready to speak unpleasant truths to gratify our malice against those whom we do not love, or perhaps even without this excuse, when we indulge in idle gossip. How different was our Lord's rule. He says, " Although these things fill you with sorrow, never- theless, I tell you the truth." He told them what was unpleasant, because it was for their good. He did not hold back part of the truth, as people so often do, for fear of offending them. He told them the whole truth because it was important that they should know it, although it was hard for them to hear it. It was expedient for them that He should go away, in order that the Comforter might come unto them ; and instead of waiting for them to find this out for themselves, Christ tells them of it, tells 244 (B;ryebtencg of (Unyfeaeant txni^B. ^ them plainly, though it pains them to hear it, tells them not only that He is about to leave them, but that His departure, the very thought of which fills them with sorrow, is for their ultimate benefit. ;i 245 XXXIL THE HOLY GHOST AND SIN. S. John xvi. 7, 8. *' It is expedient for you that I go away : for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you ; but if I depart, I will send Him unto you. And when He is come, He will reprove the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment." N these words our Lord not only tells His disciples why it is expedient that He should go away — that the Comforter may come unto them — but He reveals to them the purpose and work for which the Comforter shall come as it regards the world at large. Of course, we must bear in mind that the work of the Holy Ghost in the world is many-sided. He comes to bear witness to Christ ; He comes to guide the Church into all trulh ; He comes to endow the 246 Church with special powers of grace ; but His work upon the world and in the individual soul is summed up with great conciseness, and yet with sufficient fulness in the v/ords, " He shall reprove the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment." Most persons probably read these words without adequately understanding them, certainly without realising that in them is contained an epitome of the work of the Holy Spirit upon the soul of man. First we must point out that the word translated " reprove " (eXe-y^ei) ought to be convict. The word itself signifies to convince by argument, and so, in this case, to convict the world of sin. But what do we mean by convict ? What is the full force of this word ? It is a word of very wide meaning, for it implies, first an authoritative examination, and then someone who has a right to make the examination — as in a court of justice the court has authority to examine witnesses. It further implies unquestionable proof; in a court conviction cannot follow unless the crime has been proved. And lastly it implies the power to punish, for no court convicts a man of crime unless it can pass sentence upon that man. If we apply this to the conviction of the world by the Holy Ghost we shall see that the term conviction involves such a conviction, that he who 247 •«^ ^irt^ ^^^utBbdg in &cnt rejects it, rejects it with his eyes open and at his peril. And this is precisely what happens when an individual rejects the work and teaching of the Holy Ghost. We cannot apply this to the heathen who know not God, nor to those nominal Christians who have never really come into contact with the work of the Holy Ghost, and whose rejection of Christ's claims upon them is not so much wilful, as from ignorance of the overwhelming force of those claims. We must refer it rather to those who have seen the light and turned from it, because they loved darkness better ; who have seen the truth and rejected it, because its acceptance involved sacrifices which they were not prepared to make. But it refers also, thank God, to those who have seen and followed the guiding of the light, and have heard and obeyed the teachings of the truth. The work of the Holy Ghost is put by our Lord under three categories or heads — sin. righteousness, and judgment. And this division is in a sense exhaustive, since sin, righteousness, and judgment are the cardinal elements in the determination of man's spiritual state in the world ; for in them his past, his prese7it, and his future are summed up. Man's past is summed up in the word " sin ; " if the conviction of sin has led to its proper result 248 tf}C %oi2 (B^M Ci.xi^ ^tn. r^©- in penitence, his present will be an intense striving for righteousness ; and this will enable him to look forward, with hope and confidence in the mercy of God, to the future, to the judgment which awaits all men. Let us further consider these three states more in detail, and first the work of the Holy Ghost in convicting man of sin. The first work of the Holy Ghost upon the soul of man is its illumination. God's light shines in the soul revealing to man two things — his present condition — what he is ; and his future possibilities — what he may become by the help of God's grace. And this self-knowledge is the basis of all future growth in righteousness. We need to pray, ** Lord, show me myself ; Lord, let me not deceive myself." The first revelation of self to a sinner is indeed overwhelming. Long forgotten sins stand out clearly in the light of the Spirit of Truth, and the soul too often seems a chaos of conflicting passions and desires. We see good and noble purposes formed, but never carried into execution. We see grievous sins realised, feebly struggled against, and then constantly yielded to. The Holy Ghost first brings home to man that he is a fallen creature, possessed of great possibilities of good or evil, but unable, by himself, to rise from sin 249 '^^ ^ixt^ S^^utfibag in £enf. to break its chains, to live the life of righteousness. So that he can express his conviction of sin in S. Paul's words, " For the good that I would I do not : but the evil which I would not, that I do . . . I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me. For I delight in the law of God after the inward man : But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and brinf^ing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members. O wretched man that I am ! who shall deliver me from the body of this death ? "* This is the first step in the work of the Holy Ghost in man's soul — to convict him of sin. We must first learn the possibilities of evil in us, and then the dangers which threaten us and our own absolute inability of ourselves to overcome this evil. After this we must realise that we are subject to the influence of one of two powers, of one of two spirits — the Spirit of good, the Holy Ghost, or the spirit of evil, the devil. We must recognise the fact that we are not, and that we never can be independent. Our will is free to choose which it will serve of these two masters, but serve it must, either enrolling itself in the service of God, which is perfect freedom, but not independence, or in the service of the devil, which is degrading bondage. * Romans vii. 19-24. 250 The Holy Ghost shall convict the world of sin. The world is always making mistakes about sin, taking erroneous views of it — that sin is a misfortune which cannot be avoided, or a disease which man has inherited. In either case it persuades itself that it is something which man cannot help, and for which, therefore, he is not really responsible. The world will not admit the guil^ of sin. Our Lord says that the Holy Ghost will convict the world " of sin because they believed not on Me." Since Christ came into the world sin may be traced back to rejection of Him ; and it is this which the Holy Ghost brings home to the soul, that sin is practically the result of unbelief in Christ as the Son of God, unbelief in Christ as the Redeemer of man, unbelief in the power of His precious Blood to wash away sin. For the basis of repentance is faith. If you do not believe in the power of Christ's precious Blood to cleanse you from all sin, you will never rightly repent of your sin. You may have remorse for it, you may regret it, but you will not repent of it. The Holy Ghost shall convict the world " of sin, because they believed not on Me." It is the work of God's Spirit to bring this faith home to your soul, to make it not only an intellectual opinion, but a moral conviction, so that you may not merely believe in 251 -o^' ^xxt^ ^^^urebag in &enf. theory that Christ has made provision in His Church for the absolution and remission of your sins, but that the moral conviction of sin may lead you to use diligently the means which Christ has provided and appointed for its remission. But not only does the Holy Ghost convict the soul of sin, it provides the remedy. For the Holy Ghost is the Agent in the Sacraments of the Church; by Baptism He applies the precious Blood of Christ to the remission of all sin both original and actual ; and for post-baptismal sin through the absolution of the Church He restores the soul to the state of grace by the renewed application of the Blood of Christ. The Holy Ghost convicts the world of rejecting Christ, of leaving unused His sacraments of grace, of refusing to see that sin is rebellion, lawlessness, of attributing sin to other and insufficient causes — to weakness or ignorance, instead of error in the intellect and perversion in the soul, and therefore the rejection alike of truth and righteousness. The Holy Ghost convicts the world of the erroneousness of its theories and brings home to the penitent a true conception of the malice of sin, a realisation of what sin is in God's sight, and so, lays in the sinner's soul the foundation of penitence. 252 XXXIII. ^ixt^ S^tbag in &enf. THE HOLY GHOST AND RIGHTEOUSNESS. S. John xvi. 8, lo. "And when He is come, He will convict the world . . . ot righteousness, because I go to My Father, and ye see Me no more." E have seen that the cardinal elements in the determination of man's spiritual state are three — sin, righteousness, and judgment ; for in them his past, present, and future are severally summed up. We are told by our Lord, in the passage under our consideration, that the Holy Ghost has a special work to do in the human soul in regard to each of these. We have treated of His work in convicting the world of sin ; we have, therefore, for our consideration to-day His work in convicting the world of righteousness. 253 The first work of the Holy Ghost in the sinner's soul, as we have seen, is to reveal to it its true state, to bestow upon it the gift of self-knowledge, and, if he use it, the gift of penitence. This is strikingly brought before us in the parable of the woman and the ten pieces of silver,* which is indeed the great parable of the work of the Holy Spirit The woman begins her work by lighting a candle, which typifies the illumination of the soul by the Holy Ghost, the light of the candle revealing the condition of her house. She sees the dust of sin, the result, perhaps, of years of neglect. Then follows the diligent sweeping, which brings before us the work of penitence ; and as this sweeping proceeds and the dust is removed, the piece of silver is discovered hidden away among the dust. The light shines upon it, and the silver piece responds to the light, reflecting it with metallic glitter. At this point in the parable we reach the second stage of the work of the Holy Spirit in the soul — the discovery of its innate possibilities of righteous- ness. Some have seen a striking analogy between the coin stamped with the image of the reigning sovereign and the soul impressed with the image of God, the Lord of all ; but, beautiful as the analogy is, it can scarcely be pressed in this case, since * Cf. S. T.uke XV. 8-10. 254 the word {dpaxfMrjv) translated a " piece of silver " signifies the Greek drachma, which did not, like the Latin denarius, bear upon it the emperor's image and superscription, but was generally stamped with some device — an owl or tortoise, or the head of Minerva. While we may not press the analogy, the fact is no less true that the soul of man bears impressed upon it the image of God ; and it is the revelation of this, its intrinsic value because of its immense possibilities, which is the second stage of the work of the Holy Ghost in man's soul. The Holy Spirit not only reveals to the sinner what he is, but shows him what he may become if he will correspond with God's grace, diligently sweeping away the dust of sin through penitence, and earnestly striving to perfect the work of righteousness in his life. But this, again, is the special work of the Holy Ghost, Who is the Sanctifier of the elect, and Who, after He has convicted the world of the need and possibility of righteousness, proceeds to the work of sanctification in the soul which surrenders itself to His guidance. But in what does this work consist ? First, in bringing home to the soul the righteous- ness of Christ as the only righteousness possible. Our Lord said of the Comforter, " He shall testify 255 ^ ^ixi^ Snbctg in SLcni, of Me," and again, " He shall glorify Me, for He shall receive of Mine and shall show it unto you."* Then in the work of imparting to the soul this righteousness through incorporation with Christ by Baptism, and through feeding upon Him in the Holy Communion ; for we must remember that the Holy Ghost is the Agent of all the Sacraments. The priest may pour water upon the child and say the words which Christ commanded, but it is the Holy Ghost Who regenerates that child. For, as our Lord said to Nicodemus, '* Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the Kingdom of God."-f- The priest may consecrate the elements in the Holy Eucharist, but it is the Holy Ghost Who makes the Bread and Wine to become the Body and Blood of Christ. And yet ap^ain, if this righteousness should be lost by yielding to mortal sin, it is the Holy Ghost Who, working in the Sacrament of Penance, restores the soul to the state of grace. " He will convict the world .... of righteous- ness, because I go to My Father, and ye see Me no more." In these words our Lord associates righteousness with His Ascension ; for the life and death, the resurrection and ascension of Christ * S. John XV. 26 ; xvi. 14. f S. John iii. 5. 256 placed righteousness in a new light, and brought it within the reach of every believer. Christ's Ascension, the consummation of His life and work, was the vindication of God's righteousness, of Christ's righteousness. And more, the exaltation of the Son of Man to the life of glory at the right hand of the Father in Heaven was necessary, as our Lord reminded His disciples, in order that He might send that Holy Spirit, Who should convict the world of righteousness, and sanctify all who should yield themselves to His gracious influence. So S. Paul, quoting from the Psalmist,* says, " When He ascended up on high, He led captivity captive, and gave gifts unto men/'-f* What were these gifts ? First, the Holy Ghost ; for Christ said, " It is expedient for you that I go away ; for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you ; but if I depart I will send Him unto you."{ Then the gifts of grace which the Holy Ghost brings to the soul. Lastly, to encourage us in our pursuit of right- eousness, there is the thought, the conviction, that since, and because of, Christ's Ascension there is reigning in Heaven glorified Humanity in the Person of the Son of God, the Lord of righteousness ; and there comes to us from the throne of Heaven * Psalm Ixviii. i8. f Eph. iv. 8. j John xvi. 7. 257 S ^ ^m frtbftg in &ent. this message, " To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with Me in My throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with My Father in His throne."* * Rev. iii. 21. 258 XXXIV. ^ixi^ ^dturbag in £enf. THE HOLY GHOST AND JUDGMENT. S. John xvi. 8 and ii. *'And when He is come, He will convict the world .... of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged." F man's past state has been one of sin, and his present condition ought to be a state of righteousness, there can be no doubt in the mind of the Christian that there awaits him in the future the Day of Judgment. And it is the work of the Holy Ghost to convince man of this, to bring it home to him, not merely as a dogma of faith to which his intellect gives assent, but as a tremendous moral fact which must influence the whole of life ; for the teaching of S. Paul, that " we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ ; that 259 every one may receive the things done in his body, accordinor to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad,"* is an essential dogma of a Christian's faith. This is accomplished largely by arousing in man, or, if it be already aroused, deepening in him, a sense of responsibility, a conviction of the strictness of the account which he must give for his life here. A conviction that the day will come when he will have to render an account of his stewardship, when he will be accused by the accuser of the brethren, the devil himself, of wasting his Lord's goods, of misusing or not using the talents committed to him for the work of life in this world. There is in every man the sense of responsibility ; for this is one of the innate ideas implanted in man by God Who created him. If you were to stop an unbeliever in the street and ask him, " Are you a responsible being ? " what would he answer ? He would certainly say, " Yes ; every man who is not deprived of the light of reason is a responsible being." He will say this ; for there is in everyone an innate conviction, the voice of natural conscience, which brings home to him, more or less, a sense of responsibility. But if you were to go on to ask, " To whom arc you responsible?" you would not find the same * 2 Cor. V. lo. 260 universal agreement in the answer. The Christian, without hesitation, would say, " I am responsible to God ; " the unbeliever might reply, " I am responsible to society, to my fellow-men, or, perhaps, to my own higher self. I am responsible to my conscience which, if I do wrong, reproaches me and pursues me with the accusations and pangs of remorse." We shall not consider the unbeliever's answer further than to observe that it is quite inadequate, and is extorted from him only by the undeniable fact of the existence in every man of a sense of responsi- bility. Our Lord reveals to us that it is the work of the Holy Ghost to convince the world of judgment, that is, to enlighten the natural conscience in regard to this innate sense of responsibiHty, to be its guide and to teach it why it is responsible, in what way and to whom. But first, what do we mean by this word " respon- sible " ? Its derivation suggests that it means we must give an answer, when we are examined, con- cerning the thoughts, words, and actions of our life. We are responsible because God, Who created us, endowed us with the light of reason and with a sense of right and wrong, with a knowledge of good and evil. The lower animals and those unfortunate human beings who are bereft of reason, are not responsible because they have not the light of reason 261 and the knowledge of ri^ht and wrong to guide them. There is an instinct in the lower animals which prevents them from doing things harmful to themselves, and leads them to choose what is best for their own limited life. Yet this instinct does not give them the power of moral choice. A dog may- be trained to do certain things and to abstain from others, but the motive is remembrance of pleasure or pain, or fear of punishment ; it is not a sense of right and wrong, not a knowledge of good and evil. Again, we are responsible because there is a tribunal before which we must stand to give account of our life in this world. As S. Paul says, " We shall all stand before the judgment seat of Christ," and " and every one of us shall give account of himself to God."* It is the work then of the Holy Ghost to convince us of this tremendous fact which awaits us in the future, that there is a day of judg- ment when we must render our account to God, and to teach us now to prepare for that great day. This preparation should affect our daily lives, should lead us so to live " That we may have boldness in the day o f judgment"! The conviction that there is a day of judgment when we must give an account of our stewardship, will lead practically to great carefulness and watch- * Rom. xiv. lo and 12. f i S. John iv. 17. 262 fulness in our present lives. It will also kindle a great desire for accurate self-knowledge, and will impel us, therefore, to such steps as will enable us to advance in this important duty. But self-knowledge and watchfulness alike demand the practice of self- examination ; for if we are to give an account we must keep an account, and self-examination is the means by which our account is kept. Again, if we are to watch we must practice con- stant self-examination ; for this is really what watchfulness means. The watchman on the walls of a beleaguered city is constantly examining or watching all that takes place without the city, in order that he may detect any covert approach of the enemy, and give the alarm to those within. The only way in which we can follow this example in regard to our spiritual life is by frequent examination of our thoughts and words and deeds, to see if temptation has been yielded to, and more, to find out precisely through what temptations the devil is striving to gain an entrance into our souls. Then, too, self-examination is necessary in order that we may repair the breaches which have been made in our spiritual fortifications by our yielding to temptation. For self-examination reveals not only the temptations by which Satan is striving to over- come us, but the extent to which they have been 263 •^ ^ixi^ ^(tturbag in &ent. consented to, and therefore the extent of the injury to the fortifications of our soul. This will lead, on the one hand, to penitence by which we remove the guilt of sin and heal its wounds, and on the other hand to efforts to acquire the opposite virtues. For penitence alone is but negative in its effects, the undoing of the injury done to our souls through sin, and it is only through the acquisition of Christian virtues, especially such as are of the very opposite character to our sins, that we can acquire strength and develop spiritual character. In this work of self-examination we must carefully bear in mind that we have not only to give account of what we have done amiss, but also of what we have left undone, of the opportunities which we have neglected, of having wasted the goods committed to us. Our Blessed Lord in more than one of His parables warns us of this. In the Parable of the Talents and in the Parable of the Pounds, it was the man who had not used his one talent or pound who was cast into the outer darkness ; and in the Parable of the Judgment Day, those on the left hand, who received the sentence of condemnation, were told that it was because they had left undone works of mercy, because they had failed to use opportunities of loving service to their fcllow-nicn, that they were condemned. 264 We must further notice that our Lord tells us that the Holy Ghost shall convict the world of judgment, because "the prince of this world is judged," or rather hath been judged ; for the tense is the perfect (KCKpirat). The prince of this world, Satan, was judged on the Cross, when guilty man was redeemed, for the Cross was indeed the judgment seat of Christ, where the debt of sin was paid, the devil condemned, and man, through the merits of Christ, acquitted. The devil, as his very name implies, comes before God as the accuser of man, but finds himself accused of man's fall, and condemned in the very act by which he thought to gain the victory, the act by which he strove to put to death the Son of God. As S. Ambrose has said, The wolf seized the Lamb of God in his jaws, but found his jaw broken on the Rock of Ages ; for Satan's power over man was broken by the Passion and Death of Jesus Christ. The Cross of our Lord is the judgment throne not only for Satan, but for all men who come in contact with it ; for all men are judged by their relation to the Passion and Death of Jesus Christ. Sin was the cause of our Lord's Passion — our sins ; and we must say in the words of the great penitent, David, " Deliver me from blood-guiltiness, O God."* He * Psalm li. 14. 265 ^ ^ixi^ Safutbag in SLtni, was thinking of his guilt with respect to the shedding of Uriah's Blood, we of our share in the shedding of the Blood of Christ by our sins. We are judged by our relation to His Passion ; for that Blood which was shed upon the Cross either cries out against us for vengeance, or is poured upon us, cleansing us through penitence. Satan has been judged and condemned, and for him there is no further judgment ; we are being judged now. We are called upon to judge ourselves day by day ; for there is a tribunal of mercy before which we may even now give our account, and receive acquittal for our debts in preparation for that great day when all accounts will be rendered, and each will receive either acquittal or condemnation. 266 XXXV. THE HOLY GHOST OUR GUIDE. S. John xvi. 12-15. ' ' I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when He, the Spirit of truth, is come, He will guide you into all truth : for He shall not speak of Himself ; but whatsoever He shall hear, that shall He speak : and He will show you things to come. He shall glorify me : for He shall receive of Mine, and shall shew it unto you. All things that the Father hath are Mine : there- fore said I, that He shall take of Mine, and shall shew it unto you." |E have spoken of the work of the Holy- Ghost towards the world, and towards the individual soul in the world, as manifested in convicting the world of sin, of righteousness, and of judgment. In the next section, which we are to consider to-day, our Lord turns to the work of the Holy Ghost in relation to the Church, to His work among those who have passed from sin unto 267 ^ (fflonbdg in ^ofg ^uL righteousness, and are members of Christ's mystical Body, the Church. The office of the Paraclete is not confined to the conviction of the world ; He carries forward the work begun by Christ in the disciples, and, by guiding them into all the truth, He glorifies Christ, and inspires and directs the Church. " I have yet many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. Howbeit when He, the Spirit of truth, is come. He will guide you into all truth : for He shall not speak of Himself ; but whatsoever He shall hear, that shall He speak : and He will show you things to come." This is one of the most important passages, one of the most encouraging promises, in the Bible ; for it is upon this promise that the Church depends absolutely as the teacher of truth. Our Lord had laid down certain principles in His teaching, but One was needed to guide the Church in the application of those principles, One who could supply a divine commentary upon them, applying them, not only to the needs of individual life, but to those of the universal Church. Especially was there need that the meaning of our Lord's Passion should be unfolded ; but this was not possible until the Resurrection and the Ascension and the life of glory which followed 268 tU l^ofg Kai,) so that a more accurate rendering would be '*even as Thou gavest Him authority over all flesh." The term "all flesh" describes mankind in its solidarity. Christ, as the Incarnate Son of God, exercises legitimate authority over all man- 298 kind, as its true Head and Representative now reigning at the Right Hand of God. As the Son of Man, the second Adam, the representative Man, Christ is the sum of humanity, and, therefore, has authority and sovereignty over it. " Even as Thou gavest Him authority over all flesh, that He should give eternal life to as many as Thou hast given Him." The words translated " as many as Thou hast given Him " are, in their original form, very remarkable.* Literally it is that " the whole of that which Thou hast given Him, to them should He give eternal life." And we have a contrast between "all flesh" over which He has authority, and all " given Him," that is, all the elect, who are drawn to Him by the Father, to whom He gives eternal life. For only those can come to Him whom the Father draws, and to these, who accept Him, He gives eternal life, and what this eternal life is, He explains in the next verse. "And this is (the) life eternal, that they might know Thee, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, Whom Thou hast sent." (Literally, "that they know Thee and Whom Thou didst send.") We learn from this verse, first that eternal life is the gift of Christ, it cannot be obtained otherwise ; and * nau 6 debcoKas a.vT(o, 299 secondly, that it consists in a knowledge of the Father, the only true God, Who is manifested and revealed by Christ and in Christ. Here knowledge implies the apprehension of truth by the whole nature of man. We may know a great deal about God by studying reve- lation and theology, but that is not "the eternal life." The eternal life is a personal knowledge of God, which involves not only an intellectual apprehension and moral conviction, but the action of the whole nature upon that conviction, the appro- priation of the knowledge so that it influences the whole life. This is the eternal life — to know God and Jesus Christ ; for you cannot know God with- out knowing His Son, Jesus Christ, Who reveals Him. "I have glorified Thee on the earth ; I have finished the work which Thou gavest Me to do." The first two tenses are aorists {€56^a(Ta, reXacoo-af), so that the translation should be, " I glorified Thee on earth, having accomplished the work." The accomplishment of this work was the means by which Christ glorified the Father. But what was this work which the Father gave Him to do, and which He here claims to have accomplished? It was a life of unswerving obedience, of perfect love, which made His Death meritorious. There 300 have been theologians in the past, who have looked upon the sacrifice of our Lord's death as an isolated act, as though it was the mere fact of His dying which redeemed the world. Our Lord's sacrifice, however, was not only the act of death, but the sacrifice of the perfect life which culminated in death. It was the offering of the life of One Who had never disobeyed one of God's laws, never faltered in fulfilling one of His Father's commands, never swerved from the path of Divine Love. It was this which made the Life, offered on the Cross through death, efficacious for taking away the sins of the whole world. The life of love issued in the Hfe of obedience, which was the consequence and evidence of His love. The Passion and Death were the climax of this obedience, and they are here spoken of as though already accomplished, because they were then accepted. The perfect Life was finished, the perfect work was done, and Christ stood, as it were, before the altar on which He was to be offered as a sacrifice. There is, however, another point brought before us in this passage — a point of great importance, though sometimes overlooked. It is the entire absence of any sense of failure on the part of our Lord in regard to His work; He says, " I have 301 -^ (ttlaunbdg 2^^ut6bag. finished," or, rather, " I have accomplished (reXftwo-af) the work which Thou gavest Me to do." And on the Cross, just before He died. He again said, " It is finished " (rereXeorai).* Throughout our Lord's life we see the same con- sciousness of absolute power, the conviction that His work was progressing steadily to its appointed end. And yet, looked at from a mere human point of view, it seemed to be a failure, for all His disciples deserted Him and fled, and He was condemned to death. Humanly speaking, our Lord's life ended in failure, and yet, never for one moment, even in His darkest hour, did He utter one word which implied that His work was anything but a success. And this consciousness of success amid apparent failure is, in itself, an indication of His Divinity, for no mere man could have said to the Father, " I have accomplished the work which Thou gavest Me to do." S. Paul, when his life was drawing to a close, writing from his prison in Rome to S. Timothy, says, " I am now ready to be offered, and the time of my departure is at hand. I have fought a good fight, I have finished my course, I have kept the faith."t He says, " I have finished my course^' not I have finished my work. " I have fought the good fight, I have kept the faith." He • S. John xix. 30. f 2 Timothy iv. 6, 7. 302 could be thankful for what he had accomplished through the grace of God, but he was conscious of many failures in his work. Only Christ could say, " I have finished the work which Thou gavest Me to do." Throughout this chapter the pronoun " I " is emphatic, and who is the " I " ? There can be no doubt from the next verse, " And now, O Father, glorify Thou Me with Thine own Self with the glory which I had with Thee before the world was." In these words our Lord claims, as He does again in the twenty-fourth verse, to have lived with God before the world came into being, claims eternal Sonship, claims to have possessed a glory which He laid aside when He became Man, and which, now that His work is accomplished. He is to reassume. 303 XXXIX. THE SON AND THE DISCIPLES. S. John xvii. 6-19. " I have manifested Thy Name unto the men which Thou gavest Me out of the world : Thine they were, and Thou gavest them Me ; and they have kept Thy word. Now they have known that all things whatsoever Thou hast given Me are of Thee. For I have given unto them the words which Thou gavest Me ; and they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from Thee, and they have believed that Thou didst send Me. I pray for them ; I pray not for the world, but for them which Thou hast given Me ; for they are Thine. And all Mine are Thine, and Thine are Mine ; and I am glorified in thcni. And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to Thee. Holy Father, keej:) through Thine own Name those whom Thou hast given Me, that they may be one, as We are. While I was with them in the world, I kept them in Thy Name : those that Thou gavest Me I have kept, and none of them is lost, but the son of perdition ; that the scripture might be fulfilled. And now I come to Thee ; and these things I speak in the world, that they might have My joy fulfilled in themselves. I have given them Thy word ; and the world hath hated them, because they are not of the world, even as I am not uf the world. I pray not that Thou shouldest take them out of the world, but that Thou shouldest keep them from the evil. They are not of the world, even as I am not of the world. Sanctify them through Thy truth : Thy word is truth. As Thou hast sent Me into the world, even so have I also sent them into the world. And for their sakes I sanctify Myself, that they also might be sanctified through the truth." HAVE manifested Thy Name unto the men which Thou gavest Me out of the world : Thine they were, and Thou gavest them Me; and they have kept Thy word." Here the prayer passes into a new channel, and as our Lord had prayed for Himself, so now He prays for His disciples. The petition ''glorify Me" becomes " sanctify them " and " keep them." In this first verse we may notice a threefold declaration : (i) Of the relation of the disciples to Christ ; (2) of their relation to the Father ; and (3) of their own intrinsic worth. And each of these statements is a plea in favour of the petitions which follow, and together with them make a portrait of a true disciple. First Christ says of them, " I have manifested Thy Name unto the men whom Thou gavest Me out of the world." The Father must draw them (out of the world) to Christ ; for our Lord said, " No man can come to Me, except the Father, which hath sent Me, draw Him."* * S. John vi. 44. 305 X ^ (&oob :§'rtba8» " I have manifested Thy Name." What Name ? We, who have been studying our Lord's last discourses this Lent, can have no hesitation in answering this question ; for we must have been struck by the fact that the one absorbing subject of the addresses is the revelation to the disciples, and through the disciples to the world, of God as t/ie FatJier. The Name which Christ manifested to them was the name " Father." In the Old Testament God revealed Himself to His people under various names, the greatest of which was Jehovah, the Self-existent One, The revelation of God under the Name Jehovah to the Israelites was an immense advance in their know- ledge of God ; for they learned that He was not only their Creator, but that He was Himself Underived and Self-existent. In the New Testa- ment, however, the advance in the knowledge of God is enormous when Christ reveals Him as the Father. The Father, that is, of Jesus Christ, the Son of God, and of all those who, by incorporation into Christ, have become His sons by adoption. From the philosophic conception of God as Underived and Self-existent, we pass to the tender and comforting revelation of God as " Our Father, Which art in Heaven." In this first declaration, then, Christ manifests 306 their relation to Himself, in the next He shows their relation to the Father. " Thine they were, and Thou gavest them Me." They belonged to God, not merely as His creatures, like the rest of mankind ; not merely as Israelites, like the rest of their race, but as Israelites indeed, who responded to God ; and because they belonged to Him in a special sense through this response, they were given to His Son. But, thirdly, our Lord reveals something of their own intrinsic worth, when He says, " And they have kept Thy word. What word ? The whole revelation of Christ which we include under the name of the Gospel. They not merely heard this Gospel as others did, but they kep^ it. In the Parable of the Sower we are told of the seed falling on various kinds of ground, some by the wayside, some upon rock, some among thorns, but some upon good ground ; and we read, " That on the good ground are they, which in an honest and good heart, having heard the word, keep it, and bring forth fruit with patience."* These keep the word of God as our Lord declares the Apostles had kept it. " Now they have known that all things whatsoever Thou hast given Me are of Thee. For I have given unto them the words which Thou gavest Me ; and * S. Luke viii. 15. ^^• (Koob Stiixxg. they have received them, and have known surely that I came out from Thee, and they have believed that thou didst send Me." All careful students of S. John's Gospel must have observed his habit of using certain emphatic words to emphasise the point of his argument. There are three such words in this passage, which together bring out the character- istics of faithfulness in the Apostles. They are the words " received," " known," and " believed." They received the words, that is, the revelation which Christ gave them ; and they came to know {^yvoiaav) by personal experience, and therefore with certainty, that I catne out from Thee, and therefore believed that Thou didst send Me. The characteristics of the disciples are gathered up under two heads of knowledge and faith, both alike directed to the recognition of Christ and His Mission. " I pray for them ; I pray not for the world, but for them which Thou hast given Me ; for they are Thine. And all Mine are Thine, and Thine are Mine ; and I am glorified in them." I am praying for them ; the verb is in the present tense, and the " I " is emphatic. I am not praying for the world. The exclusion of the world from this particular prayer of Christ's is no limitation of the extent of His love for the world, but is the necessary conse- quence of the circumstance of the prayer. At this 308 €^c ^on dnb t^e ©t6Ctpfe6. ^ moment He is interceding exclusively for those who have been prepared by Him beforehand to continue His work. Later in the prayer He does pray for others, for those who should be brought to know Hiin through the instrumentality of the Apostles. When He says, " I am praying for them ; I am not praying for the world," it does not mean at all that the salvation of the world is not dear to His heart, and ever in His thoughts ; for on the Cross His arms were wide stretched for three longr hours in intercession for the world. But here the inter- cession is for His disciples, and the declaration of the grounds upon which His prayer is urged, is followed by a statement of the circumstances which make it necessary. Christ leaves the world, but the Apostles still remain. The Master must be separated from His scholars, for Christ goes to the Father, and so enters upon a new sphere of His mediatorial work in which His mode of action shall be changed ; and so He prays, " Holy Father, keep through (in) Thine own Name those whom Thou hast given Me, that they may be one, as We are." The correct reading here is "Keep in Thine own Name." Christ had already said I have manifested Thy Name of Father to them, now keep them in that Holy Name, keep them in its power, help them to realise what 309 ^ (Boob 5^fib