ii^ ♦ , 4 iTIIni^terial f^ibrary, PETERBORO'. JVo, f 3 Gift of .J^ prefented 63 thofe claims to which country gentlemen are cipccially cx- pofed, ihe did not plead public exigency as a reafon for re- ftraining private benevolence ; nor did Ihe make her domet tics miferable by penurious reftriclions. " The world," fhe obferved, *' will always allow you to fpare from yourfelf. «' If you never attempt to outfhine your neighbours, they ** will pardon your old gown, and permit you to flay at home <* unqueftioned." By limiting our wardrobe, or giving up an excuriion, it is pofGble to avoid the cenfure of being mean, and the pain of knowing that we embarrafs our hufband's aifairs. It is worth confidering, at how much lefs expenfe of time, fortune, and comfort, you may purchafe the reputation of folid, than you can of brilliant qualities, provided you arc contented with being a good p/ain chara, that though her wedded proteftor deferts his charge, fhe ftill refpecls her- felf ; and fhe will excite thofe fentiments of efteem, and chaf- tifed admiration, which fuit the hallowed and indelible cha^ radler that flie has afllimed j nor will fhe be often called upon to i'eprefs the infulting attentions of prefumptuous audacity. * See Letter XII. 3G But, bcfkle thcfc pruJential reflraints, whitii the free cen- fures of a really cnligl^ccncJ ago llioulJ impolc on that ele- vated ftation whofe acSVions are mod confpicuoiis, the demo- cratical turn whicii public opinion has lately taken, ofl'ers ftill more imperioufy momentous confiderations to check the rafh career oi open profligacy. Tiie melancholy fall of birth and grandeur in a neighbouring kingJom, may convince thofe who polTcfs fuch diftintSlions in our own, that neither law, juftice, nor power, can preferve their prefcnt fuperiori- ty, if the voice of popular frenzy decree their overthrow. With whatever feverity we may juftly reprobate the mif- chievous do£lrines which impofe on the commonalty, and pen'uade them to imagine that the fupprellion of rank and opulence would contribute to their own exaltation, or even advantage, I mufl; execrate the unblulliing vices of thofe confpicuous ilnners, who court publicity, and defy reproach ; for they are a ftill furer engine of deftruclion to overwhelm our well poized ftale. If our nobility and gentry are fwept away from remembrance, their ruin muft be accelerated by an act of felf-murder ; I fliould rather fay, by fratricide. In proof of wdiat I have alledged, that the lower orders perfect- ly underftand that vice puts all upon a level, I appeal to the tumultuary applaufe which has crowned that fcene in the play of John Bull, where the brazier feizes the chair lately occupied by the juftice, on the latter refuling to receive the frail daughter of the mechanic with open arms into his fam- ily, as a fuitable wife for his libertine heir. Have not the boxes learned, during the almoft innumerable reprefentations of this popular piece, that when they echo the laugh of the galleries, they v irtually degrade their own order ? This, tiiough n ftriking, is only one inftance of the reign- ing humour of the times. To reprcfent the higher ranks as mean, abfurd, vicious, mercenary, or tyrannical, feems a fure road to reputation among our dramatifts ; and the higher they have coloured the caricature, the more ample has been their fuccefs. Perhaps the paftion for German imitation, v/hich lately gave lav/ to our ftage, may have hurried our play-w rights into the adoption of a defamatory libel on great- nefs, without fully difeerning its mifchievous tendency. It IS certain, that when they defcribe poverty as the native foil of exalted fent'ment and dilinierefted vii'tue, they neither derive their inlpiration from nature, nor the mufe. But as this abfurd pafllon fur bombaft fuftian, trivial events, ex- travagant fentiment, outrageous liberality, and perverted mo- 87 rality, feems declining (thanks to the fplrited fatirc with which it has been attacked,) let vis hope that dramas of re- ally Enplifh growth will be clear from this foreign excref- ccnce. Let our own admirable Shakefpeare ferve here, as in other inftances, for the model. He drew the great as they really are, difgraced by crimes, or glorious for virtues, ftrug- gling witlx the temptations incident to their ftations or their nature, but not necefllirily degraded by moving in that fphere of life to which Providence limits their trials and their duties. He depi£l:ured the unlettered vulgar too in their genuine colour, and with " a maiier's hand and proph- et's fire." Two hundred years have not effaced the refem- blance, notwithftanding tiae change of manners and opin- ions which luxury and opulence have introduced. Many a valiant Talbot and open hearted Hotfpur ftill fupport the honour of their country in the tented field ; and the latter Teems indeed again "the glafs wherein our noble, youth do drefs themfelves." Many a pious Cordelia ftill minifters, in privacy, to the forrows of a petulant unhappy father j and many a faithful Imogen purfues the fteps of her truant lord, anxious to recover his affeetite •, a fmall quantity, taken ait^r proper intervals, exhilarates the fpirits, and infu- fes alaarlty into every part. This is efpeci. Uy true of the pleafures which arife from converfation. Rciined wit and brilliant fcnfe communicate an inward degree of fatisfaftion every tla;e we recall them to our remembrance. Genius, whether we feek her in the walks of the imitative arts, or in the " nobler growth of thought," does not immediately pour her full radiance on our eyes ; we muft contemplate her fplendour before we can appreciate its degree of brightnefs. Even elegance and beauty, when they belong to the higher degrees of excellence, folicit mimite attention, and refufe to unveil their coy graces \o the carelefs gaze of the hurried beholder. Are thofe then, may we not afk, true voluptuaries, who fly from pleafure to pleafure, eager to grafp all, and yet k- curing none ? No, my dear young friend, they are only another order of thofe dnulging flaves of vanity, who would inipofe thernfelves upon us rufrics as free and happy beings j or, to fpeak in faihionable Jlcingy as people of very high ton. «' Some demon vvhifpered to them, have a tafte ;" but as na- ture had VN'iihholden from them that property, they deter- mined to affect one. Without any real gufro to determine their choice, and perplexed by the decrees of fafliion, as ar- bitrary as thofe of the Medcs and Perfians, but more varia- ble than the fhape of the clouds in a fqually day, thcfe un- happy people, without a relifh for any thing, are forced to fee all that is to be feen, and to go every where, left they fliould omit the one amufement on which their eclat de- pends. You, who are accuftomed to fpend a happy even- ing in the enjoyment of domeftic tranquility, would laugh to obfcrve the multitudes which the world of falhion pours forth as foon as the world of bufinefs has retired to re- pofe. Did you fee that inceflant routine of carriages which ri,y;b.tly pour through the ftreets and fquarcs at the weft end of the town, you would at leaft conclude that reft and do- meiiic comfort were facriiiced to fome cxquifite enjoyment ; 95 and that no one would reverfe the order of nature without having Ibme equivalent to balance the privations they muft endure. Satisfied that the owners are going to be very hap- py, I fufpedl that your humane difpoiition would lead you to pity the fervants, and even the horfes, who muft be ex- pofed for many hours to the inclemency of the weather ; but could you look within thefe fplendid vehicles, you would confefs that the real objecfts of pity were there. Lanpuid and fpiritlefs, the fine lady fets out upon her nightly round, more reludlant than the v/atchman does on his monoto- nous talk. She muft ftep in at all the places that are mark- ed in her viftting lift; but as time prefTes, and difpatch is neceiTary fhe can only jufb look in and fee who is there be- fore £he flies to another quarter. She muft go to fuch a public amufement, becaufe it is the firft night of an exhibi- tion which every body talks of; flie can, however, do no more than make her entry and exit, for her time is minuted, and a vaft deal of generaldiip depends upon the expedition of her coachman- Aik this votary of fafhion, whether fhe liked her preceding evening, and her account will only add to Solomon's mournful catalogue of deceitful vanities. She cannot tell you what was faid or what was done ; it is al- moft impoffible for her to recoUetTt whor^ fhe faw. There was the ufual fet at one place, and a very vulgar looking party at another. At a third houfe, flic heard fome deteft- able mufic ; and every body feemed fleepy and ftupid at a fourth. She made ?.n attempt to look in at the dear dutch- efs's ; but the crowd was fo immenfe, that Ihe could pro- ceed no farther than the anti-room : in returning, flie heard the moft violent fcreaming, and her own carriage was broke to pieces. On the whole, flie never was fo alarmed nor (6 weary in her life ; and this morning flie is annoyed by an infufFerable headache, which makes her miferabie. Still, however, flie has not a moment to fpare ; a party v/aits for her at Madame Lanchefter's ; from thence Hie muft go to the Exhibition, where fhe* can only run round the rooms, as ihe has fix calls to make in her way to the Park ; from whence fhe muft return in time to drefs for a dining party ; fhen to the Opera ; and after that flie meets a fev/ private friends at a petite fouper. Obferve, indinaticn and pleafure are never ailigned as the motives for thefe Herculean la- bours ; compulfion and fiecejfdy ftipply the impetus for motion. She diflikes all that fiie fees, the fatigue is infupportable, fhe knows it will kill her j but rigid duty profcnbes refleiliion 96 and rcpofe. To whom, you will aflc, docs flie owe this du- ty ; to her God, her King, or her family ? No, Ihe owes it to vanityy who calls tliis a life of pleafure. The toiling mill horfe is not a greater flave, nor are his motions circumfcrib- ed by more arbitrary injunclions. For do not fuppofe that a certificate of your having driven about town all night is fufficient to acquit you of being a hum-drum ; you muft prove that you have been at the very high parties, and ex- aand and the wife fhould al- 'wap purfue different plans of pleafure. I do not wilh the wedded pair to be infeparablc ; I know that occalional ab- lence renders the dearell; fociety more delightful j and that being engaged in different fcenes gives fpirit and variety to the conjugal tetc-a-tete. But the duties of life impofe a fuf- ficient neceffity for feparation ; and when the hours of amufement arrive, let the zeft of pleafure be heightened by participation. General cuflom feems to imply that there Is clanger in public places ; or why do ladies require protec- tors ? and can a man of reflecStlon expert to efcape the re- proach of wittol hufband, who declines efcorting her to thofe haunts of Comus, In whole prefervation he Is moft in- tereiled } I am aware of the ridicule that a family party in a ftage-box muft excite j but a gentleman in Weftmlnfter hall often makes a more ridiculous, I might fay deteftable ap- 99' pearance. Much may be there {laid refpedling the breach of a facred truft ; and many oratorical flourilhes may be in- troduced about violating the laws of hofpitality, and betray- ing the honour of confiding friendlliip ; but unlefs the plain- tiff can give better reafons for abfenting himfelf from his wedded charge, than that he v^^as in purfuit of fome other amufement, reafon and experience will condemn him for being guilty of culpable folly, in putting friendlliip to an un- neceffary teft. Were fuch hufbands candid, they would ex- claim in the words of Carles, " The crime was mine, " Who piac'd thee there, where only thou could'fl fail 5 " The' well I knew that dreadful pofl: of honour " I gave thee to maintain. Ah ! who could bear " Thofe eyes unhurt i" The Revenge. Yoll, my clear Mifs M , will readily conceive that I am not pleading for the treacherous friend or the recreant wife •, I believe that genuine virtue, when ftrengthened by chriftian principle and fupported by divine grace, can van- quifli every temptation ; but I know that divine grace is on- ly given to thofe who afk it ; and I fear, chriftian principles are not the predominant rule of conduiSt am.ong the gay and giddy votaries of pleafure. Chaftlty, even 'when fupported by fuch invulnerable guardians, fhould not be wantonly ex- pofed to fevere trials ; and furcly, when flie cannot boaft fuch prote/- juredf either in friendlhip or in love, though his wife drink deep of the cup of infamy. But it is my own fex that I chiefly hope to benefit by my admonitions ; and here let me earneflly entreat thofe ladies whofe will gives law to the world of fafliion, to endeavour to refcue matronly manners from that extreme affe^lation of levity, which is now become fo general, that it is confid- ered to be the aflbciate of perfetlt innocency of intention. The flirine of virgin beauty is now deferted by its moft de- firable worfliippers, who hover round the chair where love- lincfs, already " link'd and wedlock bound," diipenfes her unmeaning or m/;j//w/fmiles. The m.arried dame trips through the light maze of the dance, and fliov.'s her gay youthful partner to the provoked fpinfter, who is obliged to fome an- tiquated caro fpofo for not fuflering her to fit flxivering on the ottoman all the evening. A married lady may go any where, mix in all companies, drefs in any flyle, fay any thing, and do every thing not abfolutely fcandalous, without impeachment of her fair fame. If any allov/ancc ought to be made for levity, flioukl it not be granted to youthful in- experience, to indifcreet fimplicity, and to the too frank dif^ clofure of that wifli to win hearts which is very natural to the early part of our lives ? "Why fliculd a woman who has pledged her vows at the altar, and is thereby appropriated to one man by the laws of God and her country, try to gain admiration, which, if acquired, can only become a fnare to her virtue or her peace ? Her choice is made j it will there- 101 fore be in vain for her to try to captivate hearts which flie muffc immediately reftore. Will it add to her felicity, to difcover that a gentleman fuperior to her hufband in merit, fortune, or rank, conliders her as the moft charming of her- fex ? will it not rather lead to moft dangerous comparifons, to regrets fatal to every hope of happinefs, or even content ? But let the infatuated woman, who gratifies her vanity at the hazard of her peace and reputation, know, that perhaps her conquefr is not fo very certain as fhe fuppofes. Her victim may have very different ends in view from that of fweliing her triumphs. His own grofs paffions may fix him in her train, not to be trampled upon by her tyranny, but to be her conqueror. Whatever Ihe may fuppofe, or he pro- fefs, fhe never would have been " his happieft choice," ev- en had he feen her before ihe v/as affigned to another. He has too much averfion to the marriage yoke, for her charms to vanquifli his prejudices ; and her principal attraction, in his eye, is the conviction that he may flirt with her without iin ofScious friend's requefting to know whether he has any icrious intentions. This character is well defcribed in the lively farce of the ** Wedding day ;" the regret of Lady Conteft at not having feen the engaging lord before flae had tied herfelf to old Sir Adam, and her furprife at his declin- ing the honour of her hand when fhe was unexpectedly re- leafed from her former bonds, affords a valuable leffon to married coquettes. Before I difmifs the fubje:ccl our fellow-creatures, but to conquer ourfelves ; nor will the fplendour of the crown of immortality be decrcafed, becaul'e it blazes upon the brows of myriads of happy beings. Envy of fuccefsful competition, and jealoufy of preeminent abilities, will never torment the bofom of the young chriftian, who, engroffed by the necefli- ty of looking at her own ways, ccafes to be a fretful obferv- er of the progrefs of others j being alTurcd, that at the day of judgment fhe cannot be overl'.oked amid an infinite hoft of happy Ipirits who claim the kingdom of their Father, nor concealed by a multitude of finners who call in vain on the rocks and mountains to hide them from an omnifcient eye. In judging of the folly of thofe who feek to form their children upon the model which vanity prefents, we mufl: add, to the great hazard of fuccefs, the brevity of the acqui- fition. As the career of a fine lady is ever in danger of be- ing arrefted by rivals in expenfe and tafle, {o rivals in ac- complifliments are coming forward to difpute her pretenfions to fuperiority. Nor is this all : every year brings in a new fafliion, even in thefe particulars, and the bulinefs of educa- tion is never liniflied. If you choofc to dance, paint, fing, and play, till you reach your climacteric, you muft ftill have mafters to teach you the Injl improvement, or you will be laid afide as old lumber. Our mothers, who danced all their lives to the tune of Lady Coventry's minuet, will fcarcely conceive how ephemeral are the triumphs of the fucceflbrs of that paragon, who had the good fortune to flourilh at a period when the empire of beauty and tafte dreaded no other enemies than the fmall-pox and old age. The minuet de la cotir and the cotillon were afterwards thought better calcula- ted to difplay the female figure to advantage, and thefe laftcd in fafliion long enough for one generation of dancers -, but reels, ftrathspeys, and waltzes, now fucceed each other with fuch rapidity, that only the mofl flexile form and fixed at- tention can rife to the praife of having learned the figure, before they mufl afTume different contortions, and wind in- to another meander. The like obfervation extends to all tracts ; to which, while writing thefe Letters, flie has occafionally refer- red. She will feci much flattered, if the reader fliould jilfo trace an inci- dental and undcfigncd refcfiuWance, arifin^ from timiiarity of opinion on irariyiu ^loials. 105 other accompliiliments : there is even a fafhion in language ; the accent rhuft retreat, or advance, according as ton, not fyntax, has ordained ; and the word of the year muft hold a prominent place in our converfation. Our paffions and fenfations muft be fubjeo: to like control ; we muft either be immoderately happy, monftroufly delighted, intenfely charm- ed, or amazingly interefted. But as expreffions of extreme fufFering are beft adapted to the joylefs career of a fine lady, we muft allow that her tafk of learning will be chiefly bounded by the compound epithets of immenfely dull, hor- ribly fatiguing, and infufferably vapid. A few mornings ob- fervation will Ihow her what misfortune is moft in vogue, and give the proper tinge to her dolours for the enfuing winter. If the quackery of education only extended to the forma- tion of vain and frivolous beings, Ave fliould have far lefs reafon to complain of its prevalence. Many ftrong minds would reiift thefe fhackles, and difappointment would divert ill directed underftandings to fome nobler purfuit. But as we have before obferved, a fyftem of morals is formed ftill more dangerous than this fyftem of manners. The popu- larity of either mode of education feems to depend more on the lituation than on the intelledls of their refpe(rtive parti- fans ; yet it appears as if the frivolous fyftem was moft in repute among fecond-rate gentility ; while the bold theory of human perfectibility feeks its converts among thofe who, feeling themfelves to be above the immediate influence of the temporal conflderations which reftrain their fellow-crea- tures, would fain get releafed from the eternal confequences of indulging their guilty paflions. A morality, therefore, which rejects the balls of religion, is admirably fuited to people who, while they feem to make the opinions of others their ftandard of right and wrong in affairs of vanity and fancy, really bow to no other idol than felfiflmefs, and amidft a life of real privation are fecretly purfuing felf-enjoyment. To banifh from the mind the ideas of an omnifcient God, and a retributive hereafter, gives an amazing releafe to the appetites ; but this emancipation will not fatisfy thefe new organizers of the human foul. The paflions muft be made tyrants ; and for this end the moft fuitable means are pro- vided. The habitual indulgence of violent defires, is by them called exerting the nobleft energies ; and difcarding the re- ftraints of virtue, is mifnamed ingenuoufnefs and obedience O 106 to the honeft dilates of nature. Thefe nefarious principles frequently prefcrve thofc external pretences of decorum, which are judged expedient to forward their univeHal adop- tion in this country j and thofc very fyitcms which inculcate vice profcfs the greatefl regard for virtue. To conlinc our obfervations to what we are now dii'culling ; volumes liave been written on the fubject of education, which profefs to form a moft amiable and intelligent being, infinitely fupcrior to tlie prefent inhabitants of this world, and which, but for the ftudied omifTIon of revealed truths and religious motives, might pafs for the effects of real philanthropy. The difap- pointment of thofe parents who attempt to form their chil- dren upon thefe models cannot be pitied, unlefs they really are ignorant that human wifdom never difcovered a perfect fyftem of ethics, without borrowing the aid of revelation j nor can flie even then devife barriers fufliciently ftrong to prevent our frail natures from deviating into bye paths of error, unlels flie renounce the guidance of her own pale fires, and fubmit to be led by the clear radiance of the gof- pel.* The deficiency of this new fyflcm of felf-dependent vir- tue, is not more apparent in the weaknefs of its reftraints, and the feeblenefs of its motives, than in the very limited circle to which it even pretends to direct its improvements. Many chriftian graces are excluded from its good deeds ; and the cardinal virtue of our anceftors, the very bond of focial intercourfe, is now little inculcated in education, or enforced by fafliionable practice j I fpeak of moral honefty, and the fimple but energeiic principle of paying every one his juft debts. The difficulty which I find in treating this point in fuch a manner as to render it palatable to polite readers, is a fufficient proof that the duty is quite gotie out. Yet honour and honefty were once thought to have a recip- rocal relation ; and the alliance was fo congenial, that I think the former quality has appeared to be in a he whofe attendance only a confummate coxcomb could derive fatisfa^lion, and not from a mifappropriation of what he owns belonged to his tailor and hofier. How can the audience \n the lail fccne acquicfcc in Maria's delliny ? Charles indeed Ill tells us, that he never more can err, becaufe he fhall now have a monitor and guide ; but has he not already told us, that he does an imprudent action precipitately, left he fhould be checked by the monitor within him ? To fuch a character, the fober paces of juftice will ever appear lame and hobling j but the misfortune is, it is not generofity, but difhonefty, which outftrips her. The infolvent muft relinquifli the fub- lime pleafure of relieving indigence, from an abfolute impof- fibllity of enjoying it. He may be bafcy he cannot be benevo- lent in any thing but defire. If he truly valued the ability of giving, he fliould have referved fome little remnant o£ his polTeflions from the gulph of diffipation, and faved his tender heart from the exquilite anguifh of finding himfelf incapable of relieving mifery. Companion is one of thofe inherent qualities of the fe- male mind, which feem to defy the influence of lituation. Even fafhion dares not utter a decree againfl the fovereignty of benevolence ; and though a fine lady muft be too frigid to feelf Ihe thinks herfelf bound to cffeti tendernefs. She is indeed allowed to be a little whimfical in the objefts of her bounty, as all muft be who renounce the dictates of nature, and refign themfelves to the caprices of art ; yet, as it is ne- celTary to have her name down in charitable fubfcriptions, though it be only to relieve " A fidlcr of note, who, for lace on his coat, " To his tailor ftands much in arrears;" we may obferve, that without fome attention to pecuniary concerns flie cannot be (I will not be fo uncouth as to fay honeft, but) genteelly benevolent. And yet, after all the abufe that can be beftowed upon the impertinence of tradel^ men, they are neceflary appendages to the votaries of vanity, witliout whofe alliftance every attempt to propitiate the idol they adore, or to outfhine a rival, would be impoffible. The afpedt of a decoration painter, when he fets out an apart- ment in a ftyle of elegance, is fo very engaging, that if the obligations which are due to him were but fubtilized by pafling through the alembic of German fentiment, they might become native alcohol ; and no longer loading the feeble (houlders of the old beldame Jti/lice^ they would even ferve as an impetus to aid the flight of Charles Surface's ad- mired equeftrian nymph Generofity. By perufing the items which form the debts of a genteel bankrupt, we might dif- U2 cover what portion lliould be afligncd to lionour, and what to honefty. I hope no well bred perfon will deny, that ex- penfive furniture, elegant clothes, magnificent houfes, and fumptuous entertainments, are as neceflary to eclat, as occa- fional burfts of liberality, or even as fpirited manctuvcrs at the gaming table ; every afliftant, therefore, who lent his aid to expedite the Herculean labour of fquandering a large fortune with rapidity, prefents a claim upon honour^ which if people are faithful to the principles they profefs will be readi- ly accredited, in an inverfe ratio to the real utility of the fervice, or the moderation of the demanded recompenfe. One word more upon an evil which, on account of its de- ftru^live tendency, fhould be hunted out of the world, by the heavy club of argument, and the miffile ihaft of ridicule : does not this inattention to the diftrelTes which arife from extravagance, refult from the want of more enlarged views in thofe who form the principles of youth ? Education, whether it proceed upon the fhowy or the philofophical plan, is now directed to the formation of a felfifli charadler. Even the minute attention which is beftowed upon children in- duces them to overrate their own importance, and to under- value others. The love of praife, or of diftindlion, to which they are taught to make fo many facrifices, unqueftionably feeks its own gratification •, and when the exercife of benev- olence is recommended as a means of enjoying pleafant and efcaping painful emotions, felf is flill held forth as the pre- dominant feature. But befide thofe whom we may wifh to gain as admirers, or as penfioners, there is a very numerous body of our fellow-creatures to whom people of rank ought to extend their views ; I mean thofe whofe good opinion they do not think worth courting, and whofe ferviccs they cannot command. Thofe who are converfant with the great, know well that they are apt to confider their own do- meftic fervants as fuperior in fituation to refpetStable tradef- men, or profellional people not decidedly in the line of gen- tlemen. A contempt for every thing city, or bourgeois, forms a part of the inftruilion of young people of faihion : this is certainly very blamable, however it may be extenua- ted by the citizen or bourgeois deferting their own charac- ters and afluming the calt airs of quality. It fecms doubtful, whether manners really have improved by breaking the connexion that fublifted in feudal times be- tween the chieftain and his vafials. It might, now that the fword of civil difcord deeps, and the rage of family animofi- 113 ty has ceafed, be converted into a mofl: powerful means of ameliorating the habits of every order, and correcting the faults of all. But then the nobleman and his dependants jnuft not meet on terms of equality. The yeoman's wife muft not affront the baronefs, by adopting her parapherna- lia, or apeing her table -, nor muft the baronefs invite her ruftic neighbours to laugh at the limplicity which it is her intereft to cherifh.* I am indulging a Utopian idea, that a fpot in this ifland can ftill be found, in v/hich affectation and flalfe refinement has not corrupted the manners of the inhabitants ; who therefore look up to their fuperiors as to their benefactors and friends, without envy, and without any ridiculous intention of imitating a ftyle unfuitable to their ftation, and derogatory to their characters. Could fuch beings be found, furely occafional intercourfe between re- fpetSlful gratitude and generous affability, might afford fupe- rior pleafure to what the beft condu£ted mafquerade ever beftowed ; as the miftrefs of the feaft would enjoy the cer- tainty of giving delir^ht, and the partakers of it would not find it dijpciih to exprefs gp.tincation. Such meetings would alfo prove a noble fchool of inftrudtion to the riling branches of a gentleman's family, who would thus contemplate charac- ters with whom they had no other means of becoming ac- quainted, and pra6life duties for which the ordinary routine of high life, as divided into London, Bath, and Summer ex- curfions, leaves no opening. By learning the purfuits, re- fources, and difficulties of claffes not remotely feparated from their own, they v/ould imbibe a ftrong attachment to the obligations of juftice, and would correct that criminal thoughtleffnefs which impedes the fulfilment of the divine precept, " Whatfoever ye would that others fhould do to you, do ye even fo to them." They would fee (and furely to fee is to admire) that blunt intelligence which forms a predominant feature in the true Englifhman. They would obferve boldnefs of remark, originality of idea, and all thofe peculiar traits of charaftcr which courtly refinement amal- gamates into one mafs. A morning fpent in unmeaning fhopping, would then afford lefs retrofpe like pious Hannah, lliould take care to bring her young offs- pring to God as foon as they can be taught habits of atten- tion ; and the miftrefs of a fimily lliould refolve with jolhua, that ihe " and her houfehold would ierve the Lord." It muft alfo be remembered, that our church has two fervi- ces, correfponding with the divinely inftituted morning and evening worfhip of the tabernacle. Nor is this all ; religion has her private as well as her public duties ; meditation, prayer, and reading the holy fcriptures, require retirement. She who pafies the day in a crowd, cannot abffraft her thoughts from temporal objetSls ; fimilar fccnes mufl excite fimilar ideas, and the purfuits of vanity will be accompanied by their ufual round of agitations and cares. The lady who thus attempts to divide her Sabbath between God and Mam- mon, feels indeed the fervitude of both, but lofes the re- 115 ward affixed to the fpirltual duty ; I mean the ferenity, the renewed flrength, and the refrefliment, which a Sunday fpent in the bofom of domeftic enjoyment and cheerful piety never fails to beftow. I fear, my dear young friend, I have wearied you by this long review of abandoned, frivolous, or capricious charac- ters ; who, by obtruding upon public attention, call them- felves the world, and in the clamour of their vices and fol- lies drown the mild voice of retired goodnefs. I am con- vinced, that even in the higheft circle of fafhion the num- ber of really excellent women far exceed the profligate and thoughtlefs ; but as they are not " ravifhed by the whirling of a name," they choofe to let their modeft worth pals iilently along, content with domeftic affe£lion, friendfhip, and cordial efteem. Do not mifconftrue thofe obfervations into a general fatire on birth and affluence, which proceed from a convi£lion that vice owes her moft dangerous allure- ments to a falfe idea of her univerfality, and that flie affords exquifite though temporary enjoyments. In fpeaking of the fafhionable world, I adopt a well known phrafe, "rvhich im- pHes unity and populoufnefs ; but I know that it contains many inhabitants who are difcontented with its laws, and many who, though they are ranked among its citizens, yet never bowed down to its idols. It is my wifh to prevent that which is in itfelf dcteftable, from being adopted as fafli- ionable ; being aware that the unguarded are often cheated out of thofe principles by the magic of a name, which they would not facrifice to paflion, or yield to criminal importu- nity. Your lenient temper may probably think that I have treat- ed the mere fine lady, the pretty butterfly of vanity, with too much feverity ; but if I could awaken thefe triflers from their dangerous torpor, furely feverity would be mercy. They are probably refponflble for many mifemployed talents, at leafl: they are fporting with that important truft, cxift- ence. While they falfely conceive themfelves fent into the world to difplay their beauty, their accompliihments, and their tafte, life glides from them ; the opportunity of im- proving lofl: time ceafes ; and at the bar of a juft God they will be queft:ioned for flns of omijfion. It is not merely the evil that they have committed, but the good which they ought to have done, that will form the terrible inquifition. A life of felfifli indolence is a life of guilt ; indulgence is that fcriptural unfruitfulnefs whofe punifliment is fo awfully 116 predicted. The attainments to which they fi'crlficed their lives will perifli amid the morbid vapours of the grave j and the naked Tpirit will appear diverted of every graceful orna- ment, unlefs its almfdeeds, its piety, and its works of juflicc and mercy, qualify it to be arrayed in the robes of right- eoufnefs. I am not fo fanguine as to expert that my efforts will pro- duce an effeft which has been denied to genius enriched by learning, and enforced by thofe ftrong powers of argument which refult from the united bounty of nature and educa- tion. A recollection of the candid treatment which I have formerly experienced from the public encourages me to hope that my motives for this undertaking will apologize for its deficiences. Works on religion and morals, in this country, can rarely pretend to any novelty, befide the title and the arrangement ; but the mere name of fomething new beftows a momentary celebrity on even jejune productions ; while the fterling compofitions which they modernize fleep in the library. But if, while employed in reading a recent appeal to their confciences, one profligate flaould be converted, one prejudiced mind illuminated, one wavering underftanding fixed, or one thoughtlefs being awakened from the dream of vanity, I may hope for more than an earthly reward, pro- vided my admonitions are dictated hyfmglenefs of heart and vpr'ightncfs of intention. That you approve the inftrudtions which you fo little need, makes that a pleafure which would otherwife be a laborious talk. Adieu, my dear Mifs M -, may we never wafre the rich legacy of friendfhip which was fo tenderly becjueath- ed to us, prays your iiacercly affe<5lionate friend, &c. 117 LETTER V. On Religious Kmnvledgey and the peculiar Notions of Calvin. MY DEAR MISS M- V\ E have confidered what our fex was intended to be by nature, and what criminal or ridiculous compliances with the caprices of vanity and affectation would make us. We have examined the inroads that luxury and wealth have made in our manners and comforts, and the temptations to which we are expofed from the celebrity that fafliion often attach- es to folly, and fometimes to vice. We have alfo feen the neceffity of confideration j but conllderation is of no avail, unlefs the mind is prepared by previous inflru6lion to render its own reflcdlions valuable. If criminal defires, vain pur- fuits, and irritable paflions, follow us to our clofcts, they will never become the fchool of wifdom. The miftakes which the moft fuperior underflanding is apt to fall into, when hurried on by an overweening confi- dence in its own powers, mufh ftrike every obferver of hu- man nature. Genius, indeed, often abfurdly affedls lingu- larlty, and diminiflies both its refpe£lability and its happinefs by z fettled determination to differ from other people. The dangerous miftakes to which this felf-dependance betrays thoie who are fo unhappy as to cheriih it, flaould make us rejoice that cuftom has immemorially confidered humility of judgment to be requilite to women. The general docility of our underftandings difpofes us rather to receive dogmas, than to build fyftems ; and the livelinefs of our fenllbilities rather fits us for the exercife of ardent devotion, than for the indulgence of chilling doubts and perplexing difculGons. We pity the weaknefs of our fsx, when we fee a fifter de- viate into enthuliafm or fuperftition ; but when Ihe turns a declaiming deift or contentious fceptic, we look upon her as an unnatural monfter or frightful prodigy. From the time that pure religion emerged from the cor- ruptions of papal impoiition, to the middle of the lafl centu- 118 1 y, no one doubtod that the bcfl: method of arming an inex- perienced girl for the perilous confllin: which flie would be called to fuftain ngainft the world, the flefli, and the devil, would be by entrulling her with " the fliield of faith," and teaching " her to wield the fword of the fpirit, even the word of God." Our anceftors knew that thcfe were the weapons with Avjuch the Captain of our falvation defeated the prince of darknefs, when he made that memorable and inftruiSlive aflault upon him in the wildernefs, and vainly hoped that ambition, prefumption, or the Infirmities incident to his afTumed nature, might induce him to defeat the ends of his incarnation. Our anceftors, poor indeed in philofo-> phiftical illuminifm, but rich in heavenly wifdom, did not fufpeck that by imprinting the chrlftian doctrines deeply on the minds of their daughters, they fettered them with preju- dices ; nor ditl they fuppofe that they would make better women, by being kept in profound ignorance of the gofpel terms of falvation, till their underftandings were arrived at maturity, and enabled to meet their fpiritual paftor with the bold objeclions of an expert caviller. They reverenced the book of God, they fincerely reverenced it ; but they never thought that from motives of rcfpedl they ought to with- hold it from childhood, much lefs from youth. They never fufpciStcd, that the awful fimplicity of its narratives could contaminate the innocent ignorance of juvenile modefty j and though the facred volume contained many abftrufe doctrines, they ever found it eafy to reprefs the inquiries of awakened intelligence when they verged on indecorous curiofity, by remarking that in time they would have clearer notions than what their tender age now permitted them to entertain, though the full developement of myftery was referved for another ftate of exiftence. The indefatigable ailiduity of infidel philofophers has giv- en popularity to other principles of inftruclion ; and, under the pretence of avoiding fuperftitious prepoiTeffions, the minds of young women are now often fiibjecled to every im- prefiion that will prevent them from making revealed reli- gion their future choice ; for, will a rational being ever fub- mit to a code of laws of which it neither fees the utility nor the obligation .'* Aflured that morahty will make her good, that fcience will enrich her with wifdom, and that accom- plifliments create elegance, what is there in the precepts of the gofpel, or in the lives of its profeirors, to induce her to make it a voluntary choice, efpecially when llie is aiTured 119 that file is free to rejedl: it, and to choofe the laws by which fhe fliall be judged. Liberality looks as well as charity; conicious merit has a more impofing air than humility ; a Sunday rout Teems more pleafant than family devotion ; and if faith and holinels are not necelTary paflports to a better liate of exiftence, the woman of the world is for the moft part a more delirable companion than the pious chriftian. if the tallc of religious indruction be not begun while learn- ing is a duty, I know not at what period of life the mind will feel its own deficiencies, and fet about acquiring what it perceives that it can do very well without. The feeds of fcience are {own in childliood, and left to ripen with our years ; and yet we do riot hear of prejudiced geographers, nftronomers, or mathematicians. As the underllanding un- folds, clearer views are obtained ; the rudiments by which we gained our firft ideas are neglected, the eafy but perhaps circumlocutory terms by which we were enabled to conceive obje£ls far removed from our obfervation are difufed, and one comprehenlive v/ord conveys to us the m.eaning which we firft learnt by a long periphrafis. The firft principles of religion are not more difficult to be conveyed to the mind of a child, than the rules of grammar ; and they who affirm that they have a tendency to cloud the underftanding, and limit the bounds of ingenuous refearch, muft urge their falfe tenets to hearers alike deftitute of hiftorical knowledge and perfonal obfervation. But we will fuppofe a young woman, hitherto uninftnifl:- ed in the precepts and do(ftrines of revelation, pofl^efied of fufficient humility of mind to think all her literary and po- lite attainments infufficient. We will fancy her fo ingenu- ouiiy difpofed, as not to ftart at feveral myfterious palfages in the fcripture, which bear hard upon the pride of reafon, when it has been previoufly nurtured in the fchool of deifm ; and that flie does not fhrink from many pofitive injunctions inimical to the opinions and habits that llie has long been accuftomed to adopt. We will imagine (contrary to the ex- perience of all who have, in latter times, attempted to make adth't converts among thofe who are totally deftitute of re- ligious ftudies) that fhe will find her new ftudies eafy ; and we will even grant that their difficulties will not be increal^ ed by the intended difciples having ever refided in a chrif- tian country, againft the creed of which (lince fhe has not adopted it) fhe muft certainly have conceived either con- tempt or diflike. We muft fuppofe, that her early inftruc- 120 tors have l^een able to give fomc fatlsfactory reafon (which we cannot divine) why this knowledge has been fo long Avithheld, and alfo have convinced her that there is tww an imperious neceflity for lier being acquainted with her title to eternity, though if Ihe had died younger Ihe need not have known it. We muft believe her willing to renounce what appears like fafe ignorance, and delirous to incur the fearful refponfibility which arifes from knowing her duty. After all thefe allowances, we muft ftill aflc how will fhe have time to become a chriftian ? A young woman of fafli- ion has not an hour to fpare, fcarcely one dilengaged mo- ment, in which five can purfue refleccion and Itrengthen conviction ; and young women in humbler life are almoft as fully occupied ; for they muft improve their fchool accom- plilhments, and make thofe ornaments in the morning which their evening engagements will call upon them to difplay. And yet, if they become chriftians from convidlion at this period of their lives, they muft encounter the labours of a philofopher with the courage of a hero. They muft be ar- gued out of the deifm in which they have been tutored, and perfuaded to renounce the motives and habits which they have been taught to adopt. ** It is one thing," fays Dr. Waterland, " to underftand the dodlrine, and quite another to be mafter of the controverfy." A girl with a common capacity, who has received an ordinary education on chrif- tian principles, knov\'s enough to entertain notions that are fufficiently clear to her own judgment, though ihe may not be able to anfwer every objeclion that may be urged againft her belief; but adult converts muft examine ftcp by ftep the evidences on which our faith is built, and muft be able to confute all gainlaying, before their nev/ opinions can be faid' to be confirmed. And after they .have done all this, they will ftill have their church to choofe ; and the pretenfions of every denomination of chriftians muft be examined be- fore they can properly determine. This is requiring more labours from &\ erf private membcrof our congregation, than our eccleflaftical conftitutions impofe upon thole wl-.o arc to be maftcrs in our Ifrael. The longeft life (allowing for thofe interruptions which our new inftruiSlors cannot pretend to exclude) would not be fuflicient to complete thcfc converts of reafon^ who are fuppofed to be fo much preferable to what are fcornfully called hereditary believers. And when they arc completed, what would they do to promote their own hap- pii>el)!, or that of otiicrs ? 'i'he laboux* of acquiring the thco- 121 ry of duty, would occupy that feafon of life which ought to be devoted to the practice ; there would be much fcholaftic difcuffion, and few chriftian graces. Yet thofe who recom- mend this method of difciplining the world, are the loudeft in declaiming againft the effecSls that theological controverfy has upon the heart and underflanding. The dry difquili- tions of fchoolmen and divines (for thefe difputants are al- ways coupled, though nothing can be more diffimilar) is the favourite topic of abufe and ridicule among thofe who feek to form a nation of controverilalifts, and to forbid even a woman from clinging to the mercies of her Saviour, unlefs fhe can refute all the gainfaying of infidels j nay, Ihe muffc herfelf have been reclaimed from deifm by the power of ar- gument. I by no means inlinuate, that fuch a converfion is impoflible. I only maintain, that it will be attended with {o many difficulties that it mufl be too rare to be depended upon as a certain confequence. We might now appeal to ftatefmen and legiflators, who know the political importance of religious reftraints, whether it be fafe to run fuch a rilk of national infidelity. Our laws are founded on, or at leaft adapted to, our religion ; our habits grow out of both ; our well being as a people is inti- mately bound and connected with the fincerity and univer- fality of our chriftian profeflion. I introduce this motive, becaufe, though a free thinker may renounce his God, his creed obliges him to call himfelf a patriot, and confequently he muft affeft to love his country. It is acknowledged too, that in his individual capacity no hufband defires to have his wife deftitute of principle, nor his daughters atheifts •, however convenient it may be to his paffions, that other women fliould not be influenced by thofe refi:ri(Stions. We may fafely lay it down as a pofition, that religion inujl be taught in youths left it fhould not be taught at all, or left we Ihould fee the doughty polemic fuperfede devotion, hu- mility, and charity ; the times alfo require that it fhould be thoroughly taught. Let the young chriftian be well verfed in the principles of her faith, and the ground on which it ftands ; fhe will often hear thofe principles ridiculed, and Ihe will fee that foundation fapped. You will not accufe me of contradifting my affertions concerning the bad efFecSts of controverfial ftudies ; for it is very different, to learn doc- trines while aflifted by the fimplicity, humility, and docility of childhood j and to be reafoned into their verity, when you 122 have long been under the influence of confirmed habits and pertinacious opinions. A much wider range of learning mull be gone over in the latter cafe, than when our inftruc- tions are limited by the defign of enabUng our pupils to give ** a reafon for the hope that is in them." We may under- ftand the Copernican fyflem of the heavens, without being able to refute Tycho Brahe's ; and we may adopt Sir Ifaac Newton's theory of gravitation, without knowing how to difprovc the abfurdity of Uefcartcs's vorticesi Blind belief and prefcriptive acquiefccnce have been expofed to much cenfure ; and yet I truft, in times when religious difputation was unknown, and in fituations to which it has never pene- trated, many a fincere and humble foul has found them pafl^ ports to the kingdom of God ; and I fear too many indi- viduals have reafon to lament their natural tendency to doubt and fcrutiny in matters of faith. We, however, admit, that in a general point of view religion has been benefited by the violence of her aflliilants. Her evidences have been exam- ined ; her myfteries cleared of many adventitious circum- ilances ; the errors Avhich had been furreptitioufly introduc- ed into her doiftrines have been exploded ; and her pure precepts have been more clearly enforced, and more beauti- fully developed. We now live in times peculiarly dangerous to our faith ; yet it feems as if the good providence of God had propor- tionably multiplied our protecftions. Holls of learned, in- telligent, and liberal divines, have rallied around the infult- ed crofs of their blefled Mafter. A woman in humble cir- cumftances, with common abilities and moderate informa- tion, may now know more of the religion ihe profefles, than any but the moft ftudious could acquire three hundred years ago. As fatanical zeal has increafed in violence, fo the pi- ous champions of our faith have roul'ed with frefh vigoin* to the combat. Pernicious doctrines have been multiplied and familiarized in every form j and the moft eminent fcholars of the age have alio, by popular treatifes, and even by ad- dreffes to the loweft vulgar, repelled their afl'ailants. The fubfcribers to a market-town circulating library, when they choofc their novel or their play, may truly fay, " my bane and antidote are both before me." This is certainly confol- atory ; but the afilirance that our principles will be aflault- cd, either by books or converfation, renders it no longer fife for us to reft in that limited information which was once thought fufficient for our fc:x ; and fince we may become 123 enlightened chriftians, without fuch expenfe of time, and hazard of our peculiar character, as makes it unadvifable for us to be in general deep readers, it moft ftriftly behoves us to profit by the judicious inftruiftions which have been adapt- ed to our capacity and leifure ; not in order that we may become difputants, but to prevent our being " tofled about by every wind of doctrine," or feduced by the evil fpirits who are fure to attempt our deflruftion. The above obfervations, my dear Mifs M , lead us to conclude, that we muft not reft in what our parents do for us ; but that we fhould in our riper years build upon the foundation which they laid in childhood, in order that our religious knowledge may keep pace with our other improve- ments. I remarked in my laft letter, that the work of ed- ucation is as endlefs a labour, fo far as relates to accomplilh- ments, as the talk of Sifyphus ; for grown ladies and gen- tlemen learning to dance, fing, draw, or even walk, is now too frequent to excite ridicule. But it would be a ferious misfortune, if, while the hoary head muft bend and the ftiff- ened joints relax, to acquire the graces, and to excel in the amufements of youth, the fludies mofl proper for mature and declining life fliould be laid afide the moment the girl is emancipated from the fway of the governefs. If, to en- courage induftry and gratify opulence, we permit the ordef of the feafons to be reverfed, and fuffer the fruits and flow- ers of fummer to adorn winter, Avho in return gives his ices to the fervid hours of July, let the products of reafon be ftill reftrained to their natural periods. The aim of modern ed- ucation is, to make children prematurely wife ; but as the forced plant waftes its vigour by its early redundance ; fo the human mind feldom fulfils that promife of future excel- lence, which an extraordinary degree of early cultivation deceitfully cherifiies ; it generally ftops at a certain point of improvement ; and when we expected our affiduity to pro- duce a genius, the labouring mountain brings forth a cox- comb.* This muft be the confequence of a fyftem, which flops too foon in eflentials, and goes on too long in mere ap- pendages ; which fuppofes a girl of fifteen fufficiently taught in what relates to her eternal interefis ; and that a woman of fifty muft receive leflbns from a falhionable mufic mafter, that fhe may execute a new tune with all its fcientifical flourilhes. * See Letter XIII. ]24 Religious inftru tary aid. General opinion (except in thofe points wherein it is partially miflcd by fafliion) prefcribes thofe outward de- corums of condu(Sl: which are neceflary to pafs well in the world ; but thoft^ who are thus circumftanccd require to be taught, that, unlefs they found this decorum on inward pu- rity of heart, and a defire of obeying their Maker, bearing the name of Chrift will not determine them truly to belong x lad will be i'uperadded, in proportion as the certainty of faith increafcs, and as habit conlirms piety. I would peculiarly recommend to my own fcx fuch writer* as aim at communicatiufj; clfar ideas. When our under- ftanding is thoroughly informed by thefe, we may with more fafety confuk florid and rhetorical authors, if our relilh for their manner have not been abated by a more improving courfe of lludy. We are charged with being « of imagina- tion all compadl;" and one reafon that is fuggefted againft the expediency of our becoming deep theological readers, is our natural turn to enthuliafm. As the enthuiiaft is gener- ally unhappy in herfelf, and certainly very unamiable ta others, the utmoft care Ihould be taken to avoid this dan- gerous lubflitute for true piety ; by not fuffering fancy to interfere in fo momentous a point, as that of exam'wmg our t'ltlc tofalvaiion. That modefi:y of knowledge, which is alike anxious to cvoid being ignorant of what it ought to know, and of penetrating into " thofe fecrct things which belong to the Mofl High," fhould be efpecially recommended to women. This would be our beft prefervative againft the fallacious reprcfentations of a party, who now dreadfully dif- turb the peace of the church, and (I hope tmiUjtgncdly) alTauIt the foundation of the edifice which they aftedt to reverence. By recommending clear diftin^l ideas to the young members of our ellablilhment, I alfo wilh to diicredit the aflertions of another fet of enemies to our Sion, who reprefent our creeds as formed on confufed notions, and blind credulity y and our hierarchy, as one of the impofitions which priell craft and ipiritual ambition forced upon the fervile mind of half awakened ignorance. It is evident, however, that while we are encompafled by this wall of flefh, our perception of fpiritual objects mufl: be faint and indiftin^l. Of the perfonality and ubiquity of the Deity, for inftance, the molt learned men confefs that no diftincft notion can be formed. One of the reafons given by our philofophiftical perfe«Slionifl:s, why children fliould not know that there is a Gcd, proceeds from the impofllbility of their forming juft notions of Him. This overftrained re- fpe^t is affeclcd \ for the moft exalted human intellefl; la- bours under the fame defe^Tl. May we not inquire, in what refpeft tlie doftrine of the unity of the triune Godhead is 131 iefs commenilirate to the capacity of his finite creatures, than that God exifts through all time and fpace ? « Thus far flialt thou go and no farther, and here fliall thy proud waves be ftayed," faid the creative Word, when the foaming ocean firft poured into its prepared abyfs. The limits of human knowledge, though various as our under- flandings, have a fimilar curb affixed, beyond which they cannot pafs. The firft bufinefs, therefore, of tuition is, to draw this boundary line, and to inform the pupil what learn- ing and attention can do, and what it muft leave undone ; how far reafon may develope myftery, and where fhe muft bow her head, and confefs her human fallibility. When an ambaflador afiures us that he comes from heaven, we may call upon reafon to inquire into the nature of his mefllige, and the validity of his credentials. When he preaches *' righteoufnefs, temperance, and judgment to come," fhe muft confefs that he fpeaks the language of his native coun- try ; and when he appeals to miracle and prophecy, fhe al- lows that, according to her own preconceived ideas, the fovereign who employs him would thus accredit his mefl^en- ger. He may, indeed, difcover fomething of the infernal affairs of thofe regions different from what reaibn imagined was the cafe ; and he may propofe fuch terms of peace as flie did not expect or enjoin ; fuch confirmatory ceremonies as fhe did not conceive to be abfolutely neceffary. If the am- bafi^ador only came from an unknown country, he might juftly anfwer the inquiries of reafon, by fiying, " Such are *' the cuftcms cxf the nation to which I belong. With us, *' they are of great utility ; though, as they are founded on *' ufages materially different from yours, I cannot fully ex- *' plain them to you." But if he be alfo the agent of our lawful king, againft whom we have rebelled, and with whoni we feek reconciliation, unlefs reaibn exceed hertruft flie can only afcertain the abfolute verity of the envoy, and advife us to accept the offered mercy on the terms propofed. Thefe may feem to us not {o honourable to the nature of our prince, as fome that we could have fuggefted ; but as we have never fecn him, and do not know the precife rules of his internal government, our own prefumption, in judging when we have not fufficient ground to form an opinion, de- ferves the fevereft cenfure. All that we know of him in- deed, either by his vilible acts, or by the difcoveries made by his ambafFador, befpeaks him holy, wife, juft, and mer- ciful \ but as we cannot difcover how thefe attributes blend 132 with each other, fo that none fhould preponderate, we are incapacitated from prefcribing bounds to any of them. It cannot be faid, that this ambalFador may have mifrcprefent- ed his mafter ; for he has filenced this obje<^ion, by fhcw^ ing what we all know to be the royal fignet ; a vifible une- quivocal interruption of the courfe of nature ; which is, un- queftionably, the method by which God would fpeak to nian. Reafon, if faithful to her office, will alfo acknowledge, that a direcH: revelation is fuch a folemn interpofition of Heaven, as cannot be lightly and cafually aftbrded. It mufl not only be abfolutely neceflary to thofe to whom it is made ; but it muft difcover truths which could not othcrwife be known.* Had the law and the gofpel taught us nothing but what human reafon could have discovered, we muft then have allowed that fceptics are right in affirming that belief in revelation fuppofes a needlefs interpofition of the Almigh- t}'. Every myfterious dodlrine that fcripture contains is in fact a confirmation of its authenticity. We fliall hereafter inquire, whether, by its analogy to the incomprehenfible parts of vifible nature, we may not further afcertain, that the God whom we chriftians worfliip is moft truly the Creator ;and Governor of the world ; or, to fpeak more fully, that * The ncceffity of 3. divine revelation may be gathered from vhat the celebrated deiflical writer, Lord Herbert of Cherbury, lays of what he calls five fliort notices imprinted by God on the minds of all men, ifl. That there is one fupreme God. 2dly, 'i'hat he is chi(.tly to be worlliip- ped. 3dly, That piety and virtue are tJie prinrip.d p.irts of his worfliip. 4thly, That we mufl repent of our fins ; and if we do, God will pardon them. Jthly, That there arc rewards for good, and punilliments for bad men, in a future ftate. Our divines, in anfwer to thefe allegations againft the neceihty of revelation, juftly obfervc, th:.: wc muft not judge of nat- xivaX religion, or dcifm, from what we nciv know, fmce even thofe who re- jetTt chriftianity partake of the light that it has diflufird; but from what the world was previous t<^ the coming of Chrift. They propofe the learn- ed age of Auguftus as a fair fpecimen. The i1rft and iecontl notices were tlien difrcgarded ; for no nation, but the Jews, acknowledged orvvorfliip- ped one fupreme God. The moit enlightened men of that period facri- iiced to fenfual and numerous deities. Nor would the third be more re- f;arded ; for the mode of propitiating falfc gods was by abl'urd and bru- tifli rites. In refpecl to the fourth notice, the luathens reproached the chriftians for declaring that God would pardon finners ; and as to the jth, jt was hoped by fome fc<£ls of philofophers, denied by others, and doubt- ed by all. See Hey's Ledliires, vol. i. p. 342. The mere belief c.f the immortalitv of the foul, is very diftlrent from a perfuafion that this future ft.;tc will be retributive. Modern heathens proceed no furtlier than, in the words of Pope, to expet'l " an ec^ual iitaver, in which tlicir faithf»ii dog will bear them company." 133 the fyftem of the univerfe, the operations of Providence, and the covenant of grace, evince unity of defign, and proceed ijtpon the fame fundamental principles. The firfl duty of reafon, therefore, is, to examine the ev- idences and credibility of chriftianity, confidered as a whole ; her next care fliould be, to determine to which of its vari- ous fedls and denominations it is moft expedient to belong. Solitary worfhip is always comfortlefs ; and opinions infula- ted from all others are fure to run into feme wild extreme ; beflde, it is moft certain, that the promifes of fupernatural affiftance, which Chrift made to his followers, were given to tliat collective body, or (to refer to our ecclelxaftical affirma- tion of faith) to " that congregation of faithful men, where ** the true word of God is preached, and the facraments du- *' ly adminiftered," which we call a church. By thus con- fecrating community to the purpofe of fan£lity, the author of our religion has not departed from the method which he follows in the ordinary providential government of the world ; where we fee good of various kinds, comfort, fecurity, ftrength, pleafure, wealth, and profperity, all flowing from men combining together ; and mifery, weaknefs, and pover- ty, enfuing from their atSling feparately or in oppolition to each other. That it was the defign of our blefled Lord, that all his followers fliould be knit together in the clofeft bond of concord and amity, cannot be doubted by any who carefully examine the facred records of his life and conver- fation. I will point out one inftance, the folemn commen- datory prayer preferved in the feventeenth chapter of St. John's gofpel, which is particularly in point. Remember, Chrift oftcred it not only for his immediate apoftles, but " for all who fliould, through their preaching, believe in him in all the world ;" and that it was an a ligation and difannul the authority of the commandments. When I fpeak of the church in general, I keep our nine- teenth article in my eye. This church, we are informed, is iVattered over all the chriftian world ; various modes of wor- ihip, and particular tenets, belong to its disjointed parts ; yet I truft, in fpite of the efrorts of ill difpofed men, fome bond of union, fome token of intercommunity, ftill fubfifta between its members ; fufficient to allow us to fpeak of it as a whole, though certainly not as that clofely cemented, well compacted building which its blefied Founder and his apof- tlcs laboured to form j and in point of purity, as well as doc- trine, very different from that glorious church, which (in the language of eaftern metaphor) is denominated the Spoufe of the Lamb, and is to be prefented to her Lord without fpot or wrinkle, holy, undefiled, and glorious in majefty and beauty ; while myriads of myriads join in linging one fpoufal Ibng. Such is the promifed ftate of the triumphal church : if we would partake of it, we muft adhere to her during her militant probation ; and, in the fpirit of the royal pfalmift, «' we fliall be folicitous to heal her breaches j" we " fliall *' rejoice in her profperity ; and becaufe of the houfe of the *' Lord our God, we fhall feek to do her good." The church of England is that branch of the univerfal church, under whofe lliadow we are invited to take fhelter. However lightly it may be efteemed by various fanatics who have fprouted forth under its mild protection, it is efteemed, by foreign proteftants, as the preeminent fan«^tuary of the reformed religion. I will refer you to the deciflon of an eminent divine, who was highly celebrated all over the Con- tinent for his learning and moderation, and was himfelf a member of the Prefbyterian miniftry. The name of Lc Clerc fandlions his opinions with theological readers. Speak- ing of epifcopacy, he obfcrves, *' I have always profeffed to *' believe, that epifcopacy is of apojlolical inftitution, and con- <* fequently very good and very lawful ; that man has no " right to change it in any place, unlefs it was impofliblc " otherwife to reform the abufes that crept into chriftianity ; *< that it was juftly preferved in Enghind, where the refor- " mation was practicable without altering it •, and that there- " fore the proteftants in England, and other places where 139 « there are bifhops, do very ivroug to feparate from that dlf- « cipline ; that they would do ftill vvorle in attempting to •* deftroy it, in order to fet up prcfbytery, fanaticifm, and «< anarchy. Things ought not to be turned into a chaos, «* nor people feen every where without a call, and without *' learning, pretending to infpiration. Nothing is more pro- *< per to prevent them than the epifcopal difcipline, as by ** law eftabliflied in England ; efpecially when thofe who ** prefide in church government are perfons of penetration, " fobriety, and difcretion." He afterwards acknowledges that it has been fo clearly proved, that the truth of it cannot be denied, that Chrift and his apoftles indituted the epifco- pal form of government •, and that the church never had any other for one thoufand five hundred years, from our Saviour's days downward.* The teftimony of an adverfary has great weight. From motives of political expediency, Mr. Le Clerc exercifed the fundlions of a minifter in a fociety of chriftians who had rc- jetEled the epifcopal form which he fo highly commends. Notwithftanding the grateful obligations which we owe to the fathers of the Reformation, we cannot deny that they partook of the paffions and infirmities of human nature. The cruel and perfidious treatment which they had experi- enced from the Romifh church ftimulated the protcflants to an unwarrantable degree of fury, hatred, and revenge. The aim of many of thefe feems to have been, to make the fepa- ration and diftindtion between themfelves and the apocalyp- tical Babylon as marked as pofilble. Thus, inftead of taking the fcriptures for their guide, and the primitive churches for their model, it was fufficient for them to rejecl many an- cient and beneficial cuftoms, merely becaufe they had been adopted by their opponents, whole touch was efleemed to be contamination. Proteftantifm was not without fevers provocations in England, as the reigns of Henry the Vlllth and Mary the Ift amply teftify ; but whether it was owing to the more enlightened fobriety of the nation, or, as I be- lieve, to the good providence of God, who at that time en- lightened our Sion with luminaries of furprifing fpiendour, the founders of our church, as well as its firft eftabliflimcnt under King Edward the Vlth, as at its reedification under Queen Elizabeth, were guided by the molt admirable mod- eration. Nothing was rejedled merely becaufe it was the * Biblloth. torn. ix. page 159. 140 ufagc of popery, unlefs it was alfo tainted with the errors of that ambitious hierarchy. Nothing new was adopted, un- lefs the utter unfitncis of former cuftoms rendered the in- troduction of novelty unavoidable. Hence we retain not only the conftitution of the primitive church, but alfo many of its ufages. Nay more, our liturgy was compiUdy rather than compofed ; with a refpeftful reference to venerable rit- uals, their doxologies and creeds were adopted ; feveral pray- ers of our fervice were entirely tranflated from the formu- laries of early times, or from the writings of the fathers ; and in others the fenfe has been condenfed, and fuited to our cuftoms, modes of thinking, and the alteration of man- ners and iituation. Nor is it merely on account of her conftitution, and lit- urgical fervice, that the church of England claims fuch high confideration ; the fame wife moderation which determined her to preferve what was valuable and important in thefe points, kept her alfo in a happy medium between thofe op- pofite errors which at that time diftradled the peace of the world, and which, I grieve to fay, fcill fubfift. Perhaps, our )beft way of gaining a clear notion of the doctrines of our national church will be, to examine the notions of thofe who diflent from her ; and though the antipodes are not wider* from each other, and confequently though our church feems more likely to accord with either, than for them to form an agreement ; fuch is the lamentable animofity with which they purfue her, that they almoft feem to unite their difcor- dant notions in order to procure her downfal. Is not this coalition a teflimony that her exiftence is the firmed: bul- wark againft the ambition of either party ? Unlefs they are mutually infincere in their own religious profeffions, it is ev- ident that they believe they would mutually prove but weak Opponents to each other, fuppoiirig this formidable rival • Nothing, certainly, can be more pointedly oppofite, than the diflin- guilliin;; tenets of the Sociniaiis and tliofc of the Uriel CalvinifU. The one hoitis CliriQ to have done all for our falvation, by his one oblation of himfelf ; the other maintains, that fuch oblation never was olTcred. One affirms, that wc are mere machines in the hands of God ; the other, that moral virtue entitles us to reward, &c. Yet in numberlefs periodi- cal publications: profefTedly hoftile to our church, we may trace a fufpi- cious forbearance, a tacit' agreement, if not an aiflual approbation, of works of cither of the above defcription, if hoftile to the cflabliliiment ; which hoftility appears to be the rallying point of either party. Does tliis verfatility conliU with that f.'iglcnefs of heart which alone can jufU- fy djiTtnt ? 141 could be overthrown. This is a ftrong argument, to per- fuade every lover of temperate opinions to fupport what is fuch an obje£t of terror to thofe of violent and extreme no- tions. But before we proceed to the propofed inveftigation, X •will mention one other claim which the national church has to our obedience. It is the eftabliflied form of v/orfliip. I do not propofe to found fpiritual belief on political expedi- ency ; but I aflert, that the religion of our country has a prior right to our attention, fo far as to induce us to give it a ferious inveftigation ; and if her do6lrines are found to be evangelical, and her ufages, as far as change of manners will allow, apoftolical ; if in that human mixture which muft al- ways be admitted into eccleliaftical inftitutions, there be nothing contrary to fcripture ; if flie a£Fe£l no wanton exer- pife of authority, and afTume no high pretenfions to infalli- bility, nor abfolute control over the confciences of men ; it feems as if no reafon can be urged for renouncing her com- munion, except it be the ftrong predilection which arifejj from our having been educated in fome other religious fo- ciety. Had we only nonconformifts of this latter defcrip- tlon to lament, the afpe6t of the prefent times would not be fo alarming to the friends of our venerable eftablifliment, becaufe fuch opponents are the moft moderate, fteady, and refpectable ; but the dreadful opinions that arife out of the abufe of religious toleration, namely, that in this land of liberty every one has a right to choofe his religion, gains ground j and the pride of exercifing a fuppofed privilege, joined to the delire of being diftinguilhed by fuperior intel- ligence and difcrimination, and, I fear I muft add, the arts and allurements of the enemies of all religion, feduce many unftable minds, efpecially in the lower ranks of life ; who renounce the communion of the church from which they have received baptifm ; with the fame inconlideration and indifference as they affimilate their garments to the prevail- ing falhion.* * That fcliifm is not confidered as a liglit and trivial offence by the regular minifters of the prefbyterian form of worfliip, may be perceived in the following extracSl from the works of an eminent Scotch divine, who indeed does but echo the fcntiments of all well conftituted churches an- cient and modern, not excepting thofe founded by Calvin, or his immediate difciples. Dr. Hill, in his I'hcological Inllitutes, obfervcs, "The name of f fehifm, therefore, is referved for fcparation proceeding upon fome friv- '■^ olous reafon, which is often merely a pretext for gratifying the paffions " of ambition, avarice, refcntment, and envy. When attachments to par- 142 As women are moft difpofed to think fcrioiifly, and to be fincere in their religious profelTions, hence arifes the ne-. ceflity of their not only being well inflrudted in the general outline of chrillianity, but alio that they fhould know the peculiar tenets of the church to which they belong, and the quilt of unneceflary feparation from her ; which church, as far as relates to my readers, I fuppofe to be that by law ef- tablilhed. You, my dear young friend, have had the hap- pinefs of improving the elementary knowledge which you early imbibed of this, as far as human fallibility will admit, excellently well conftituted fociety, into the folid preference which reililts from having inveitigated the propriety of its inftitutions and dodbines. Yet, as I know that your atten- tion has been much engrofled by your favourite ftudy of elegant literature, it is probable you may not have attended to a very Unifter attempt to overturn our church, which has been inveloped in a pretended affection to her original in- " ticular teachers form chriftians into parties, they fall under the cenfurc * which Paul addrefled to the Corinthians, " I hear that there are con- " tentions and fchifms among you. Every one of you faith, • I am of « Paul, I of ApoUos, and I of Cephas, and I of Chrift. Is Chrift divided ?' " When the feparation proceeds from the idea of forming a more perfedl « eftablifhment, it is feldomduly confidered that no human inflitution can •' be faultlefs, and that the evils which ncceflarily arife from fchifm far " counterbalance any advantages which may be expedlcd from improve- " meats not eflcntial to the conftitution of the church. When chriftians " feparate, bccaufe the difcipHne of the church docs not appear to them " fulFiciently ftridl, they act as if the comfort and benefits derived from " the ordinances of religion depended upon the characSter of thofe who " partake with us ; or as if the purity which the anabaptifts require in *' the church of Chrift could be attained on this fide the grave. And " when their only complaint is with fome regulations of the church con- '• ceriiing matters acknowledged to be in thcmfclves indifferent, they for- " get that it is impoliible to frame any regulations of fuch matters which " will meet the prejudices and ojjinions of all ; that obedience to compe- •* tent authority enjoining what is not unlawful for the fake of order, " does not imply a facriiicc of chriftian liberty ; and that the new con- " gregation cannot exift, and attain the purpofes of its inflitution, with- " out fome cxercife of the fame authority. " Whatever be the nature of the frivolous or corrupt motives which " give to reparation the character of fchifm, the conduct of all who attain " the name of fchifmatics is blameworthy. It does not correfpond to the •* defcription of the catholic church, which is faid in fcripture to be ' one «' body, in which there ought to be no fchifm ;' it is contrary to the ei- " hortations and entreaties of tiie apoftles, recommending unity and peace; " and in all a<^cs it has appeared to the church deferving of the fame rc- " prchenfion and cenfure which the apoftles diredied againft a fimilar « fpirit in their Jays." A modern author calls fchifm ' a bugbear, that formerly tormented weak confcienccs, but now completely exploded like Witchcraft and magic' 143 ftitutlons, and zeal agalnft a fuppofed pcrverfion of what, it is alTerted, were her fundamental do6lrines. This con- troverfy is fo extraordinary and recent, that I conceive I Ihall be of fome fervicc to my readers, by enlarging upon and refuting an ill founded charge. The party which thus calumniates our exifting church recommends itfelf to the favour of its readers by arrogating the title of evangelical chriftians. An ephemeral publica- tion is circulated, addrefled to our fex exclufivelyy in which the names of about one hudred and fifty chapels, churches, and meetinghoufes, are enumerated, where the minifters whofe names are fubjoined are faid to preach the go/pel. The inference fairly is, that the gofpel can only be heard in thofe fpecified places. The moft learned, impreflive, enlighten- ed, and, I may add, valuable clergy of the eftabliihment are not in this number ; it is therefore obliquely denied that the gofpel is preached by them. If we alk thefe pretenders to fuperior light what their gofpel is, they will perhaps anfwer in the language of a charming poet and worthy man, whofe mind was unhappi- ly warped by this prejudice, " It is the divinity of the glo- *' rious reformation ; I mean in contradi- ing damnation from the juftice of God, and being damned without the interpofition of mercy, the difference is im- menfe. Calvin terms good works the fruits of grace ; that is to fay, he afcribes them folely to the overruling power of God. Our 1 2th article determines them to be "the fruits of faith ;" that is, as being produced by our co-operation with our divine Afilftant. This is farther fpecified in the I oth article, where the grace of God " is faid to work luith us." The 15th and i6th articles decide fo pointedly againfl: Calvin's idea of the impeccability of the eledl, that to refer to them is fufficient to fliow that our church never held tenets fo contrary to fcripture, and fo apt to engender the deadly fin of fpiritual pride. I call it deadly, becaufe tljere is fo little hope that they who have fallen into it fliould ever experience a real converfion and true repentance. The 17th article, which the Calvinifts chiefly build upon, ufes the term eleffion, indeed ; but not as confined to par- ticular perfons. It fpeaks of the deliverance of the whole Chrifiian world, not only from curfe and damnation, but alfo God's intention to bring them to everlafiing falvation, as vefl!els made for honour. While it encourages godly perfons to rejoice, and to meditate on the high promifcs to which as chrifi:ians they are entitled ; it dilTuades curious and carnal perfons from attempting to penetrate into thofe myfterics of God's fecret counfels, by which the " devil doth either thrufl: them into defperation or into wretched- ncfs of unclean living, no lefs perilous than Jcfpcration." 151 The word reprobation is not mentioned in this article ; in Calvin's fyftem, it ever ftands oppofed to eleercy in Chrift Jefus, and their « pardon fealed in heaven before they go hence, and be no *« more feen." Thus refuted, our adverfaries ought, in propriety, to have confefTed their miftake, and renounced the charge ; but another fubterfuge remains : they iniift, that our firft reformers v/erc Calvinifts. If the affiirance of their own words can avail, Cranm.er, Hooper, Latimer, and Ridley, were decidedly anti-calvinifts.'* Hiftory confirms their tef- timony by recording their condudl. It is known, that the venerable archbifhop, to whom we look up as the builder of our Sion, rejeElcd the afiiftance of Calvin, and folickcd the advice of Melanclhon, who was the moft mild and candid of all the foreign reformers. It is alfo certain, that the apof- tle of Geneva was dijfatisfied with what he thought our im- perfect reformation. The views of archbifhop Parker and his coadjutors, who, on the acceffion of Elizabeth, re-edified our defolate church, were congenial to their renowned pre- decefibrs. It is acknowledged, that our clergy became af- terwards much tinctured with Calvinifm, having imbibed it at Geneva, whither many of them had fled for flieltcr dur- ing the Marian perfccution. But ftill thofe who adopted fuch opinions were confidered as dijiurbers of the cftablifli- * See Anti-Jacobin Review for September, iSci 153 ment, not as ajfertors of its original do£trines ; which is a ftriking difference. In the reign of king James I. this party grew to be fo very numerous, that a conference was held between them and their opponents ; in which the Calvinifts attempted to ef- tablifh feveral new articles, that had been agitated during the latter part of the reign of queen Elizabeth. As a proof that the abfolute predeftinarians in thofe days were more ingenuous than their offspring, by confefling that our thir- ty-nine articles would not fuit their purpofe in their prefent form, I will fubjoin a copy of the celebrated Lambeth arti- cles, propofed by the Calvinifts in the time of queen Eliza- beth, and brought forward at the Hampton court conference in the reign of her fucceffor. I ft, God from eternity hath predeftinated certain men to life ; certain men he hath reprobated. 2d, The moving or efficient caufe of predeftination unto life, is not the forefight of faith, or of perfeverance, or of good, or of any thing that is in the perfon predeftinated ; but only the good will and pleafure of God. 3d, There is a certain number of the predeftinated, which can neither be augmented nor diminiftied. 4th, Thofe who are not predeftinated to falvation, fhall be neceffarily damned for their lins. 5th, A true living and juftifying faith, and the fpirit of God juftifying, is not extinguiiJied, falleth not away, it van- ilhcth not away in the elect, either finally or totally. 6th, A man truly faithful, that is'5 fuch an one who is endued with a juftifying faith, is certain, with the full affur- ance of faith, of the rerniflion of his fins, and of final falva- tion by Chrift. 7th, Saving grace is not granted, is not communicated, to all men, by v/hich they may be faved if they will. What horrid bbfphemy ! 8th, No man can come unto Chrift, unlefs it fliall be given unto him, and unlefs the Father draw him •, and all men are tiot draiun by the Father. 9th, It is not in the will or power of every man to be faved. The difference of thefe articles from thofe of our church need not be pointed out, nor will I expatiate on their un- fcriptural abfurdity and dreadful tendency. There is a de- gree of clumfy management in the 8th 5 which, confidering U 154 the care with which they were framed, is furprlfing. It begins with a text of fcripture, which is made to fpcak as they would have it, by an ahj'olute additioti of their own, for which there is not the leaft authority. But to return to hiilorical teftimony : though king James had been educated in tlic Scotch church, he diflikcd thefe harfh fayings j his clergy oppofcd them ; and it was by the advice of arch- bifliop Laud that the royal declaration waS afterwards pre- fixed to our articles, ordering them to be underftood in their *' literal grammatical fcnfe." The Calvinifts of thefe times have a(Sbially appealed to this regal inftrument, to teftify that the king intended our articles fliould be underftood as favourable to their opinions ; though it is pofitively known, that his majefty was influenced by the advice of Laud, a knov\'n (and, confidering the times he lived in, imprudent) Armenian.* In the clofe of king Ciiarles the firft's reign, Calvinifm indeed triumphed ; but the victory was not gain- ed by reafon ; the fword was the terrible arbitrator j the king and the primate bled upon the fcalfold ; the houfe of lords was abolifhed, its members mafTacred, or exiled •, the gentry ruined j the clergy fecjueftered ; and the country be- came the feat of civil wai, the fport of contending factions, the fccne of fraud and oppreflion, where God was infultecl with hypocritical worfliip, and man preyed on man. The prime mover of this vaft machine of mischief clofed his guil- ty career unrepentant for the numberlcfs murders and perju- ries which his ambition had prompted him to commit ; true, to the laft, to the dreadful tenets of his faith, and in full perfuafion that he was an eledt and chofen vclTel, fo entitled to eternal glory, that no crimes could forfeit his claim. * An explanation of this term may not be unufeful. The following is an cxtradl from the Britifli Encyclopedia : — Armenius was the great op- pofer of Calvin ; on predcftination, he held, that the decrees of God arc conditional, in confcquence of forcfcen faith and virtue, or forcfccn in- fidelity and wickcdnefs. On univcrfal redemption, he fays, that though Chrifl: made atonement for all mankind, none but thole who believe in him can claim that benefit. On the corruption of man, it is his opinion, that we are incapable of doing or faying any thing good, without the re- generating power of the Holy Ghoft ; yet divine grace may be refifted, and rendered inefFeiflual, by the pcrverfe will of the impenitent finner. That it is the grace of God which prtferves us in a re;;cnerate (late ; but that the riglvteeus may lofe thtir juflifying faith and die in their fins. At the fyiiod of Dort, fummoned in 1618, on account of this contro- verfy, our divines bore public and decided teflimony to the dotElrines of univerfal redemption and free agency ; and the king, with the greatcfl: part of our clergy, difapprovcd the proceedings of that fyuod, and pre- ferred Armenius to Calvin. 155 Allow me to relieve your fatigued attention, by dire(5ling it to the death of a gentleman, who, I, think, was the only eminent inftance of a perfon's taking the dark fide of Calvin- ifm, by believing himfelf to be a reprobate, and incapable of the mercy of God ; I mean the humble, melancholy, and too keenly fufceptible Cowper. In early life when he had juft recovered from a dreaclful mental difeafe, he fell into the fociety of fome well meaning people who had adopted thofe unfortunate notions. The grateful bard, attached by their kindnefs, united himfelf to them by the ftrongeft ties of af- feiStion, and fufFered his enlarged underftanding to be warp- ed by their fyftem. His biographer does not flate at what period of his life the fatal notion of his own reprobation was imprinted on his mind ; but knowing that this was the cafe, we cannot wonder at his frequent fits of dcfpondency, nor at that frightful lapfe into intenfe defpair which at laft fwal- lowed up all his literary and Ibcial talents, and almofi: petri- fied his benevolent heart. The idea of his utter rejection by God, was attended by a belief that every attempt to coun- teradt it would but aggravate the fevcrity of his doom. He did not, therefore, dare to go to any place of worlhip, nor even to pray. The laft of his polthumous compolitioii?, publifhed by Mr. Hayley, entitled the Caft-away, when read with this clue, appears to me the moft affecting lines that ever flowed from the pen of genius ; and it pleads more ftrongly than a thoufand arguments againfi: permitting fuch unworthy ideas of the Almighty to enter into our minds. May the example of a Cowper's defpair not plead in vain ! then fliall we ceafe to lament the years which the amiable, but, in this point, bewildered fuiterer fpent in agonizing woe ; the innocence of his life, and the amiable tenor of his writings, feem to juftify the refplendent vifion of hope whirh depi£lures him as awakening from his long night of wretch- ednefs, at the rapturous found of " Well done, good and faithful fervant, enter thou into the joy of thy Lord !" To return to our hiftorical detail. It is not even pre- tended, that Calvinifm predominated during the reign of Charles the lid. The refignation of the nonconformift cler- gy during that period proceeded no lefs from their abhoi-- rence of epifcopacy, than from their difiatisfa^lion at the doBrines of the reftored church, whofe funds they had ap- propriated to themfelves during the fufpenfion of her lawful miniilers. I believe the temporary favour which King James 156 the lid fliowed to tlie diflcnters was never urged in proof of the prevalence of Calvinifm in his reign ; for this often- llblc countenance was merely a vi/.ard to cover that mon- arch's deiign of introducing popery, under the furreptitious pretence of univerfal toleration. The fubfequcnt reign is accufed of patroni/cing errors of a different fort •, and the llyle of merely moral exhortation, adopted by fome of our clergy, has been urged, as a reafon for the revival of Calvin- ifm, under the name of IMethodifm, about the middle of the laft century. During the period in v/hich our church is charged with having kept the great doctrines of our religion too much out of fight, flie ftill, by her articles and liturgy, i-etained her original tenets and integral conftitution. It is remarkable, that thofe eminent divines whofe vindications of the myfheries of our holy faith have immortalized their own nameSj* and that of their country, flourilhed at this very period, vviien, according to the reprefentations of our enemies, nothing but the oratory of a Whitfield, or the la- bours of a Wefley, couid have faved us from the total lofs of chriftian principles and vital religion. It is not necefiTary to fubjoin any additional proofs to the above juftification of our church from the charge of Calvin- ifm ; but as partial cleclion is the key ftone on which that fyfiem is built, I will juft mention, as a corroborative tefti- mony, that our church always held the contrary doclrine of univerfal redemption, or that every man has it in his power to be faved. I will refer you to the Homilies, and efpecial- ly to the preface to them, and to archbilhop Parker's pre- face to that tranflation of I'cripture called the Bilhop's bible, publifhcd in the year 1572, iuft after the ratification of our articles. Thefe were both acts of authority ; and, as fuch, may be properly appealed to, in teftimony of the real doc- trine of our church. TVith a few mifcellaneous remarks we will difmifs the fubje£l of ftrict Calvinifm : I willi I could fay to the oblivion that it deferves. We will firfr obferve, that preaching Calvinifm, as Chrif- tianity, muft leficn the inlluence of pure religion, except in weak and depraved minds. One of the offices of reafon, as we have before remarked, is, to judge by the tenor of the mefi'age, whether it comes from God. Now, whatever di- ininilhes our fenfe of moral obligation, is contrary to thofe . " Tlllotfon, Sherlock, Seed, Waiburton, Rogers, Waterlaud, Jones, &c. 157 preconceived notions of the juftice and goodnefs of the Deity which revelation is intended to confirm. To fay, thei-e- fore, that the ele£i cannot fin, or, what is nearly the fame, that their fins will not make them forfeit divine favour, or, that the reprobate, do what they will, cannot attain it, im- peaches the attributes of God, and weakens the moral feeling in man. A confufed underflianding may blunder upon this notion, and really believe it to be tenable ; but a depraved heart will cling to it as a defence of its own enormities. On the other hand, no good can arife from maintaining thefe do nor did his paffions rife in fuch ftroiig oppofition to his in- telledlual faculties. Every exhortation in the New Teftament which enjoins us "to make our calling and ele£lion fure," to walk " worthy of the vocation whereunto we are called,^* and <♦ to ftrive for the prize of our high calling v/hich is in Chrlft Jcfus," alike proves the n:ixcd nature of man, and that the merits of Chrill v/ill only be applied to thofe Avho (do not relift the Spirit of God. The extravagant exprefiions by which Calviniftic teachers dilguft fober hearers, and captivate or afloniih weak minds, often proceed from an injudicious imitation cr erroneous application of fcriptural phraleology. Allegorical allufions, types, and parables, formed a mode of inftruction which was ufed by our Lord with remarkable clearnefs and effedt. It was peculiarly fuited to the cuitoms of Eaftern nations j but our great dillimilarity in manners renders the propriety of fimilar apologues in this kingdom queftionable ; I mean as a popular method of inftruc^ing the ignorant ; for there can be no doubt of the fuitability of appolite ailuhon, and pictur- cfque fimiiitude, Avhen we addrefs our difcourfcs to thofe who are competently informed. Whenever the allegorical and figurative ftyle is adopted, perfpicuity, precifion, and appropriatenefs, are inclifpenfable, especially when it is ap- plied to a pafTage of fcripture j otherwife the text is dark- ened, not clucidi'.ted, by the defi^jncd explanation. A voU 173 lime of fermons lies before me, from which I will quote an inftance of what I call ftrained fimiUtude and perverted al- legory. The author fancies that at the remarkable appear- ance of the Almighty which is recorded in the nineteenth chapter of the flrfh book of Kings, *' the fmall ftill voice" in which God only was to be found was an emblem of the vir- tue of humility •, and that ftorms and tempefts, earthquakes and lightnings, were the ante-types of moral commotions, bluilering paffions, and political revolutions, becaufe thefe latter were brought about by the agency of the prince of the power of the air. This is imng'matmi^ not hijlrnclion. Who can grow wifer or better, by lillening to fuch reveries ? It is moft certain, that the coming of our blefTed Lord, and the great events of his life, were typified by many anal- ogous events that are recorded in the old teftament. This iimilitude was intended as a preparatory mode of inftruiStion, to fit the Jews for the appearance of the Meiliah. It is ob- fcrved, that chrifcianity makes no ufe of types, becaufe it leads to no future difpenfition. A flrong fancy, when it is not refirained by an equally found judgment, may multiply refemblances between the Old and New Teftament, or what is ftlU more prejudicial, between the important events which they record, and the common incidents of life ; till what was in itfelf ferious and awful becomes ludicrous, and a theme for profane wit. Le6lures on fcripture chara^lers appear to me not v/holly free from the cenfure of overftrained allulion, or from the charge of fentimental refinements on the noble fimplicity of holy Avrit. When the humour of typifying and allegorizing is unrefirained by learning or genius, the con- fequences are moll: lamentable •, for fcripture is thus convert- ed into a bye-word of reproach among the profligate. We ihould reflect, that though fantaftical hearers always think that fermon the beft which they can leaft underftand, it is impofftble that they can be edified by what they cannot com" prehend. What imagination can figure to itfelf any idea of Death and Hell concjuered, as being one of the difhes that Ihall be ferved up " at the feaft of fat things," which the prophet Ifaiah mentions as prepared by God for his chofen people ? Who can fuppofe, that Abigail falling at the feet of David, prefigured Mary anointing the feet of Chrift ; or, that the two thieves between whom Chrift was crucified were types of Lucifer and Adam ? I once queftioned a rather intelligent perfon in low life, refpedling the purport of a difcourfe which had been juft 174 delivered by a clergyman who aiTecled to be diftinguifticd as a Gofpel preacher, I was told, that they were ordered to *' kick away the thorns and briars which lay in their road " to Heaven." I inquired whether thefe thorns and briars were fuppofed to mean their cares, their forrows, or their fins ; and was anfwcred, that the gentleman *< did not tell them what they were." This is a proof, that whoever ad- mits thefe forts of decorations, fhould take care that the comprehetifton of their hearers keeps pace with the fallies of their own imaginations. I ihall here perhaps be told, that the Holy Spirit will af- fift the influence of the word of God, and caufe it to ope- rate on the heart and life of the true believer. I anfwer, that iince the miracles which eftabliftied Chriftianity have ceafed, the method by which God feeks to convince us of facred truths is by an appeal to our underfkandings. The fenfible and apparent influences of the Holy Ghoft, are a favourite theme with Calviniftic teachers. That the Divine Comforter aflift:s all true worfhippers, is a certain and moft confolatory truth ; but that we can diftinguifh his workings from the ordinary fuggeillons of our own minds, is an uti- ivarrantable inference* Dr. Law, prebendary of Carlifle, in a fermon on the Limits of our Inquiries, obferves " Much << perplexity and infidelity have refulted from too minute in- «* veftigation, efpecially of three points, which reafon muft ** ever in vain attempt to refolve : Firfl:, concerning the in- « fluence and operation of the Holy Spirit. < The Com- ** forter,' lays Chrift, is to abide with ye for ever.* " Yet ** is there no paffiige in fcripture which, Vfhcnjciir/y interpre- ** tedy will afford any countenance to the opinions of thofe «* who pretend to a fenfible experience of the Spirit, an ir- <* refiftible impulfe, an immediate converfion, and who at- ** tempt to point out the exa<5t line of partition between hu- " man efforts and divine illumination. This fpecies of ig- •* norance our Saviour feems to intimate in his difcourfe with " Nicodemus. The wind blovveth where it lifteth, and ye *' hear the found thereof, but cannot tell whence it cometh,^ • The venerated name of Gilborne fancftions the above affertion. In a fermon on Religious Comfort he levercly arraigns the methodiftical te- net above referred to, and afks, " Where is your warrant to place your " conlidence on an inward feehng; to regard an indeterminate impulfe <• as an impreiiion from the Holy Choft, as a token aud fcal of ford's holy word, left we ihouid thereby prejudice them in favour of what the wifeft of man- kind have pronounced to be ten thoufxnd times inovt pre- cious than the riclies of Ophir. There is fomething fo formidable in the term higot, efpe- cially when coupled with its ally peyfecutG-y that I do not wonder our latitudinarian fectaries have found thefe names nioft ufeful artillery to drive weak mothers from performing their duty, and to intimidate difndcnt people from avowing the principles that tliey profelied. What if I fliew, that thcfe alarming epithets are not appropriate, if afcribcd to the confcientious members of a church conltitutcd upon fuch principles as. that to which we belong ! But I muft appeal from the judgment of thofe who do not acknowledge the di- Mi,f an audacious advocate of impiety and revolt received no liarlli reproof; but the public were in- vited to read /aj- writings, by callin\^ tiieni lp!rit(.d and original. 197 vine authority of our whole Scriptures, and only ufe a mu- tilated and garbled edition of luch parts of the facred writ- ings as fuit their own purpofes. I might advert to the epif- tles of St. Paul, who authoritatively denounces various here- fies, and excommunicates heretics in the churches which he founded, and governed, either by himfelf or his immediate agents. I might bring forward the examples of St. Peter and St. Jude, who exhorted their converts to " beware of " thofe who privily bring in damnable herefies, even dcny'nig ** the Lord who bought them ;" and " to contend earneftly for *^ the faith once delivered to the faints," becaufe certain men ** have crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained " to this condemnation ; ungodly men, turning the grace *' of God into lafcivioufnefs, and denying the only Lord God ** and our Lord Jcfus Chrift ;" but I will reft my proof on the doftrines of the beloved difclple St. John. As he was moft honoured with the friendfhip of his mailer, we have reafon to believe that his character was moft ailimilated to that perfedl model of all excellence which the incarnate Deity prefented. In his writings we trace two dlftlnguifliing features j a fublime and clear view of the facred myfteries, and an ardent afFe^lion for his fellow-creatures. His Gofpel opens with a full and unequivocal teftimony of the divinity of his Mafter ; a text which, according to the conception of the learned German commentator Michaelis, has never been in the leaft affected by the moft diligent inquiry, and minute critlcifm, of thofe who would baniila that doctrine from the articles of religion. Inftead of its authenticity being Jhaken by the collections of two celebrated collators of manufcripts, Mills and Wetftein, it has been rendered more certain than e-v- er.* When we coniider that the numerous manufcripts of this gofpel which are preferved have been made by tran- fcribers dliiering in fentlments, and for oppofite purpofes ; that they lived In countries and ages remote from each other, and ufed different languages and idioms •, we muft look up*- on the authentic identity of this text as a peculiar interpo- iition of the fame Holy Spirit, which firft infpii-ed the ven- erable apoftle to pen this important truth, to refute the fal- lacies of heretics who, even in the flrft ages of the church, refufed to bow the pride of human reafon to thofe attefting miracles which wltnefted the Incarnation and fufferings of the Son of God. It is generally acknowledged, that the * The fame is obfervcd of Romans, 9th chapter and jth vcrfc. 198 gofpel of St. John was written at a. time when herefies had crept into the church ;* and every attentive reader of this facred trcatifc mull acknowledge, that it is diametrically op)- poiite to the notion of the mere humanity of our Lord. It feems fingular, that the Socinians iliould venture to afTert, that their opinions were what was anciently eireemed to be orthodox, in the very teeth of an aportolical hiftory, com- pofed for the efpecial purpofe of afierting the doctrine which is maintained by every Chriftian community but their own. I fear that I have been led to digrefs a little from my pur- pofe. It was rather my defign to propofe to you the exam- ple of St. John, than at this time to enlarge upon his docirine. The proofs of thofe fundamental articles of our faith (the divinity and atonement of Chriil) are more numerous in the writings of this apoftle, than in any other of the facred pen- men \ yet none of them appear to have glowed with fuch ardent, fuch univerfal benevolence, as this evangelill. He even makes our love to cur brother the pledge and criterion of our boalled love to our Maker. His firft or catholic epiftle is generally believed to have been written in extreme old age, when he was on the eve of beholding his friend and mafter in the full fruition of uncreated glory. How pa- thetic, how energetic are his admonitory adieus to that flock which he had fo long attended ! He falutes them with the epithet of « beloved j" he calls them " his little children j" he conjures and entreats them " to keep fteadfaft in the faith ; and he admonilhes them " to love one another," as the mark of their religion. Did he, who leaned on the bo- fom of Chrill:, believe modes of faith to be immaterial^ or that the charadl;ers of a firm champion of the truth, and a genuine philanthropic, are incompatible ? Did I fay philan- thropy ? Let me reject a term io often perverted to the baf- effc purpofes, and fubllitue !he chriftian epithet of charity. Shall we accufe the beloved difciple of inconflftency or big- otry ; and can the mafter, who felected him from all human beings as moft worthy of the glorious title of his friend, be fere ned from the charge of Aveak partiality? We will not tax God fooiithly, nor lightly impeach the conduct: of the moft diilinguiihed of mankind. True benevolence extends to the fouls as well as to the bodies of our fellow-creatures ; and what greater kindncfs can be ihewn to the former, than in fteadily refilling dreadful and fedu£tive do(Strines ? • The lirfi denlcrs of Chrift's divinity were the GnoQics. 199 From the teftlmony which the writings of St. John aiFord of his charatfler in advanced life, we may difcover'the efhca- cy of ills mafter's leiTons on his naturally vehement and vin- didlive chara(5ler. In the warm enthufiafm of early youth, he was anxious to " call down fire from Heaven" on thofe cities that would not receive his Lord ; but the un(5tion of that blefled Spirit, of which he received fo copious a fhare on the day of Pentecofl, taught him the manner in which he was to enforce his million. He now knew, that he was not appointed ruler of the Afian churches to ufe the arm of the flefh, or to affli£l and torment others. But, as no two things can be more oppofite, than tacit acquiefcerice in falfe opin- ions, and cruelty to erring brethren, he has left us a flaining example of zeal for truth, without that bafe alloy of unchar- itablenefs, which human paflions are fo apt to intermix in whatever deeply interefts the mind.* Bigotry and prejudice are as much the bugbears of this age, as the Pope and the Pretender were formerly. It is impoffible to defend what is right, without danger of en- countering the obloquy annexed to tyranny, perfecution, ig- norance, fanaticifm, and narrownefs of foul. Yet it feems as if few were fo bigoted as thofe who loudly declaim in praife of unbounded freedom of opinion ; which, when nice- ly analyzed, is generally found to mean a reftlefs delire of eftablilhing our own fentiments as the univerfal do(Slrine. Surely, when we praife the liberality of our own notions, we difcover too much vanity to bring the fentiments of our ad- verfaries into difcredit with any intelligent reader. * T am unwilling to mix with the certain authority of fcripture, the doubtful atttftation of liuman teflimony ; yet I willi to repeat two anec- dotes of this apoftle, authenticated by Irena;us, a fatiier of the fecond cen- tury, who profefled that he had thcni from Polycarp, the immediate dif- ciple of St. John. Whatever may be their authenticity, Irenseus muft have thought that they corrcfponded with the then well known charadler of this aportle. The one is, that coming into the bath at Ephefus, and hearing that the noted heretic Cerinthus was then there, he immediately left it, warning his followers to do the fame, ItR the place which contain- ed fo great an enemy to the truth fliould fall upon their heads. Tlie oth- er anecdote is, that when age difabled him from preaching at every pub- lic meeting, he exhorted his flock with thefe words, "Little children, love one another." His auditors, wearied with the repetition, inquired the reafon of it ; and received for anfwer, "This is what our Lord com- manded ; and if we can do this, we need do nothing elfe." I have quoted this account from an excellent work, once ftudied by every family ; 1 mean •Nelfon's Companion to the Feafts and lafts of the Church of England. It may be found iu various authors. 200 To apply this remark to that fpecles of Diflentcrs which is moft vehement in charging the eftabliiliment with bigot- ry : According to their acknowledged tenets, modes of faith are vnmnter'ml in the eyes of the Deity. The Romanifts, who believe falvation to be circumfcribed within the papal pale, are juftifiable in their zeal for making converts ; but what motive can we affign to thofe, who teach that " God made men to differ in points of faith," and who yet purfue every method, and move every engine, to bring the world to a conformity with their own opinion ? Is not this ufing one meafure for our neighbours, and another for ourfclves, and crying out againft tiie intolerance that we praftife ? Does this proceed from zeal for truth ? No ; with them, ** the confcious mind is its own awful world j" and what feems right to a man is determined to be right to him. The motive muft, therefore, be, either the love of contention, or that ambitious dciire of fuperiority, and bigoted attachment to their own notions, which they charge as heinous offences againft us ; who dreading the threatenings denounced againft thofe that mutilate the facred volume, dare not erafe a truth which pervades the whole feries of fcripture, from the brief but awful and inftrujSlive narrative of the formation and fall of man, to that prophetical clofe of the facred volume which lifts the myfterious veil of futurity, to fhew us the final renovation of the human fpecies in the city of the living God. I need not inform my dear young friend, that the truth to which I have alluded is, the atoning facrifice of the Son of God ; by which the Almighty Father was pleafed at once to fliew his hatred to fin, and his compaflion to finners. I do not intend to purfue the long feries of promifes, analo- gies, ceremonial inftitutions, and prophecies, by which the world was prepared for this great event ; a volume devoted to the fubjeifl would give but a brief view of the types and prediftions which announced its unexampled importance. To this point all the promifes made to Adam, Noah, Abra- ham, and the reft of the Patriarchs, preeminently tended j even thofe which appear to us to be merely of a perfonal, temporary nature, to them (as we may lear)i from other parts of fcripture) difclofed views which extended beyond this tranfitory fi:ate, and the temporal concerns of their offspring. To prepare mankind, by previous conceptions of the manner in which the offended juflice of the Almighty muft be pro- pitiated, fi'.crifices were introduced (and it is believed by di- 201 vine appointment) Immediately after the fall ; they were re- vived in the renewed covenant made with Noah after the flood ; and pofitively enjoined to the Patriarchs during their various migrations. When the Mofaical law was given by God to the Jews, it was efteemed of fuch confequence, that the regulation of it forms one entire book of the Pentateuch ; and during the whole of the Jewifh ceconomy this ceremo- nial was regularly obferved, though often contaminated by idolatrous intermixture. Conlidered in itfelf, flaying a beafl in honor of a fpiritu- al being, muft appear an abfurd and indecorous mode of homage. There is no natural connexion between fliedding of blood, and pardon of fin ; thefe purple libations, there- fore, muft originally have been of fuperhuman appointment, and intended to prepare the minds of men for that event which was to happen in fulnefs of time. It is evident, from the numerous reproofs of the prophets, that the Jews were apt to look no further than to the mere viflble ordinance ; the 50th Pfalm, and the ift chapter of Ifaiah, are .lively in- ftances of an endeavour to fpirituaU'ze the minds of the peo- ple, and to convince them that it was not the blood of calves and of goats that was really acceptable to God. If it be aflced by our opponents, why Go* would not grant the pardon that he intended, without requiring fo fe- vere a ranfom as the precious blood of Chrift .>* we may an- fwer, " it was not his pleafure fo to do." To argue on this point from what we fhould fuppofe to be noble in the con- duct of a human creature, is to produce a parallel which fails in all the known points of refemblance. It is to com- pare finite with infinite, in every point of view in which we can fuppofe prefcience, purity, juftice, mercy, power, and. remuneration to a6l. The king, who fhould offer the heir of his throne as a facriflce for the critnes of his-fubje£ls, muft have the power of railing him from the grave, before he can be produced as a comparifon for the Almighty ; and he muft be himfelfji^ilefs, before he can conflftently thus exprefs his irreconcilablenefs to gt/iit. From our confeft incapacity of judging of any thing fo remote from us as the Deity, acqui- efcence in what he has revealed becomes not only expedient, but our bounden duty. All that we know of God is from the works of his hands, and the book di£lated by his Spirit ; and from both we may learn, that " he feeth not as man *' feeth ; that his ways are equal, though ours are unequal ; Bb 202 <* and that his purpofes-are part: finding out." At pvefcnt, *' we fee through a glafs darkly ;" becaufe our faculties are too limited to give us a juft and adequate idea, either of his attributes, or of the laws of that inviilble ii.x^e m which he is more confpicuoufly revealed. Is it fo extracrdinary, that the creature cannot comprehend the Creator .'' Does fuch a defcription of the God whom we Chriftians worfhip, prove him to be any ways different from that author of nature, for . whofe myfterious operations philofophers cannot fatisfadlo- rily account in many minute inflances, though the general refult of the vilible creation compels them to confcfs that he is, and that he is infinitely wife and benevolent ."* In the moral government of the world, docs not Providence fre- quently permit afili£tion to fall upon virtue, and fufter vice to profper even by the means of its own wicked machina- tions ? This correfpondence between the character and con- duct of the Aimiglity, as described by his word and his works, opens a very copious field for obfervation, upon wliiclx we will prefently touch, though my 'knowledge of natural philofophy and fcience is too limited to enable m.e to do it the juftice that I wifli. IJut let us firft purfue our obfervations on the teftimony of holy writ on thefe two momentous points, the redemp- tion of the world, and the plurality of perfons in the God- head. The opponents with whom we now contend admit Jefus Chrift to be a prophet fent from God ; and by their lately afcrlbing to him the term Lord, I hope they have ge- nerally rejected Dr. Prieftley's impious notion that .he was mere man, and acknowledge him to be a great preexiftent fpirit, probably the fir ft of created beings, and the delegated head of the Chriitian church. As they mufi, therefore, have got over what was to them fo long a {tumbling block, the miraculous incarnation, it is much to be lamented that they could not bring their minds to receive the w/^o/e truth ; for how we can addrefs prayers to or through any created being without being guilty of idolatry, or having mean and unworthy ideas of God, they muft explain j and if he be our Lord and fpiritual head, it \sfrom him, as well z^for his fake, that we muft expert blcfllng and protection. They ftill deny the atonement, or that the world was reconciled W5 God by the death of Chrift ; but they admit that Jie re- ally was' crucified, and rofe from the dead in proof and con- firmation of the truth of the dodtrine that he was fent into the world to teach j n-dincly, the refurreftion of the body, and immortal life. They fay, it is inconfiftent v/ith the ideas that we ought to form of divine jufticc, to fuppofe that God would not pardon the guilty, vnthout feme innocent perfon paid the ftipulated ranfom of their fouls, by fubmit- ting to temporal death, to refcue the world from eternal punifliment. As they make fuch a point of explaining all the actions of the Deity on human grounds, they muft tell us how they juftify God for fuffering this innocent perfon to die, in order to convince a ftubborn and incredulous world of the truth of his million. We may tell them^ that God could have made ufe of means more fuited to onf ideas of rectitude, to convince fceptics who had refifted the pow- er of unexampled mlraclgs, with as much applicability of ar- gument to their notions, as they can urge againft our creeds, that a lefs exceptionat'Ie mode of pardoning linners might have been adopted. If they plead, that the refurrecStlon of Chrift removes all idea of Injuftlce from their explanation of this proceeding, we may reply, that, that event is equally juftificatory of the righteous dealings of God in our fyftem. According to them, the Refurre^Ion of Chrift merely told the world that he was a true prophet ; we have the words of an apoftle on our fide when we add, that it was alfo the joyful confirmation of our own reftoration to divine favour. *' Chrift is rifen from the dead, and therefore our faith is *' not vain ; we are no longer in our iins."* The Unitari- ans generally allow, that Chrift intercedes for us in Heaven. Is it not as derogatory to the divine attribute of mercy, as meafured by our finite reafon, that finners Ihould need an advocate and remembrancer to move the Almighty to pardon their failings and relieve their wants, as that their offences fliould require a rafifom ? Into thefe abfurdlties and contra- diftions men are apt to fall, v/ho open the facred volume with a predetermined idea of making it bend to their own notions, not of humbly learning, and ploufly fubmitting to what they are there taught. If thedodtrlnes of the Trinity,-]' and the atonement, reft- ed upon a few particular pailages of fcripture of doubtful * ifl: Corinthians, 15th chapter, 17th verfe. f The Socinians ftrongly objecSl to fevera! of the terms and exprcffions that are ufed in our church, as unfcriptural ; efpecially to tliis of the- Trinity. It is acknowledged, thr.t this word, or any aggregate epitome of this dodlrinc, is not to be i'ound in holy writ. It is a compendious ex- preflion adopted by the early fathers in their controverfy v/ith the Her- etics who denied this doclrinc, as more convenient than a long periphra- 204 interpretation, as is the cafe with the pofitive decrees that we lately confidcred,* it would be incumbent on us to re- flect, whether we are not called upon to make conceflions for the fake of unity, and even to enter upon a careful re- vilion of our national belief, that we might cxi'cind what was unfcriptural. But the reverfe of this is fo far acknow- ledged by our adverfaries, that as they cannot by the moft minute inveftigation, the moft fubtle arguments, the moft ftrained conceffions, and every varied rule of interpretation, get rid of the numerous and ftubborn texts which not only prefs hard upon, but adlually annihilate their notions, they have been forced to fay, that fcripture vv^as early inteypoluted for the purpofes of the Trinitarians. No attempt at prov- ing the time or place when this was done has ever been made \ indeed, as there is not the fmalleft hiftorical teftimo- ny to fupport this alTertion, they are forced to reft it upon conjedlure. They tell us, that marginal notes, written by fome partizan of our caufe, may have been foifted into the original text, through the ignorance, carelefsnefs, or bigotry of the tranfcribers. But then all tranfcripts of the bible muft have had thefe marginal notes, and all tranfcribers muft have a6ted in concert (a fuppofition that would prove all the early Chriftians to have been Trinitarians ;) for it is difficult to conceive how thefe faults in any particular copy, or fet of men, could occalion an exactly fimilar change in the thou- fands of thoufand manufcripts of the New Teftament that certainly had been in exiftence previous to the difcovery of the art of printing. The Unitarians again aflert, that thefe myfterious doc^ trines are often contained in pafTages evidently parenthetical. Is the parenthefis only ufed by facred writers ; is it not a common licence adopted by all authors, efpecially early ones •, and has the genuinenefs of the text of any ancient claffic been difputed, merely becaufe of the involution of his fen- tenccs ? We might further afli, if all, or even the greater fis. It would not be too great a facrifice for peace to give up this word, if another equally conrtprelienlive, and of as acknowledged and determi- nate import, could be fubftituted by mutual confent. But it is well known, that this is not what our adverfaries defire. Their oppofition glances from the expreffion to the docflrine, which is fo plainly inculca- ted in the New Teftament that we dare not relinquifh it, left we fliould incur the curfe pronounced on thofc who diminiili from the book. Set Rev. lath chap. 19th vcjfc. * Letter V. 205 part of texts averting the divinity and the atonement of our Lord are of this defcription ; but the grofs abfurdity of a charge, of which they do not attempt to give any proof, fcarcely deferves confutation. Another mode of evafion has alfo been adopted. We arc told, that our prefent received gofpels, &c. are " far from <' being unchanged, or the only ones given and ufed here- *' tofore on equally alloived authority." This affirmation muft indeed conflderably alarm the unlearned female chriftian, who may well tremble with the apprehenfion that what fhe coniiders as her charter of falvation, is only a mutilated frag- ment full of errors and unwarranted dodlrines ; in fliort, the compolition of prieftcraft and fraud, or the melancholy wreck of a clearer and more inftrudtive title to the kingdom of her father. But let her be comforted ; this is an ajfertioriy not zfacl. Other hiflories of the Life of our Saviour have indeed exifted, and other compofitions have been attributed to the apoftles ; but they were only human imitations of di- vinely tutored originals j or the pious, though unauthenti- cated, compofitions of well meaning, but uninfpired men ; which never had any authority in the church, though they might be occafionally read by individuals, as we read literary forgeries, or continuations of the works of different authors by inferior hands. Our learned divines have proved, by unanfwerable arguments, that though early heretics forged fpurious gofpels to fupport their falfe doctrines, the primi- tive church detected and difowned them. The quotations made from the gofpels and epiftles which we now poflefs, are fo numerous in the works of the fathers of the fecond and third centuries, that they almoft amount to a tranfcript of the New Teftament. The interpolation of paffages, or change of treatifes, which our opponents pretend to have happened, muft therefore have taken place in the firft cen- tfh'y •, that is to fay, during the life time of Saint John, who is known to have furvived till anno 94 ; and his own gof- pel, which on the earlieft calculation was not written till 70, niuft have been more interpolated and altered than any other part of fcripture, and this even during his life. Till we are Ihewn an hiftorical record which proves when and how this was done, we will iimply anfwer, the crime luas impof- sibJe. Another fuppolition has been ftarted, which It is to be feared may open a new door for controverfy ; this is an opin- ion, that the firft three evangelifts wrote from fome com- . 206 mon document, from which they paraphraftically tranfcribcd their refpc<5i;ive gofpels. Tliis is the fuggcftion of a very learned commentator, who, in his defire to produce a perfect harmony among the facred writers, and to account for every leiTer difficulty which a critical fcrutiny may find in their' narratives, hazarc^ed an opinion, probably without fully ap- preciating the alarming conclufions that might be drawn from fuch a conceffion, lanctioiied by fuch a name. No ftronger proof can be given that fuch a document never ex- ifted, than that for eighteen centuries the Chriftian church has never heard of it. The preface to St. Luke's gofpel, about v/hich fo much has been lately faid, far from warrant- ing the idea of one fanilioned original hiftory of the life of Chriil:, nofitively afTerts that many had even then " taken in *' hand to fet forth in order a declaration of thofe things " which are moft furely believed." Spurious gofpels, there- fore, exifted at that time, as well as the genuine compofitions of St. Matthew and St. Mark. The fimilitude of expreffion between the evangelifts, which induced Mr, Marfh to form this novel and unfatisficlory hypothefis, may, as a periodical writer juftly remarks,* be eafily accounted for, by admitting ** that they really did all draw from one common fource ; ** but that this fource was no other than the remembered ** converfations and miracles of their Lord, which they had " often difeufled among themfelves, and which alfo the Ho- " ly Spirit was promifed more efpecially to bring to their « remembrance." With regard to the verity of the fa(fl:s recorded in fcripture, we may obferve, that from what we now know of the fpu- rious narratives of our Lord's life, they all joined in defcrib- ing the fame fort of character, and relating the fame great out' "he of his birth, habits, doftrine, and fufferings. The early enemies of our religion alfo lend their unwilling tef- timony to the fame events. When Conftantine the Grftt eftablilhcd Chriilianity as the religion of his extended em- pire, the works of thofe who had v^rftten againft it funk into gradual contempt, and, it is certain, foon difappearcd. Of all that wit and fcience compofed againfi: the verity of our faiih, ncthing remains, but a few fcattered fragjuents of Cellus iind Porphyry, two philofophers, and of the emperor Julian, furnamed the Apollate; and thefe are pre- Ibrvt'cl in the writings of thofe fathers who refuted their er- ■* ^\nti-JacobiQ Review fo:- June, 1S05, page 125. 207 rors. Their arguments are fo completely puerile, that they would not now unfettle the weakeft Chriftian ; but their teftimony to the general truth of our religion is invaluable. For'thelc bitter enemies of Chrift, who were delirous that his name fliould never more be heard among men, and who lived within two, three, or four hundred years of the events recorded in our gofpels, acknowledged the identity, fufferings, and miracles of our Lord, and teftifi- ed the general promulgation of his religion. But the point, which I now wifh more particularly to obferve, is, that« they quoted out of the Gofpels, the Acts, and many of the epiftles, which we nonu polTefs, and not out of any of thofe fuppoiititious gofpels, &c. which we are now told were of equal authority. I have mentioned to you the name of Michaelis, a mofl laborious commentator on the original text of the New Tef- tament, which he was anxious to bring to the greateft poffi- ble degree of verbal purity. After the moft minute invefti- gation, and collation of manufcripts and verfions, he obferves, *« That though the number of paflages which afTert the ian nature in inf mcy exercife the tendernefs and patience of mature age ; fo may we fay in rcfpedl to the promulga- • The Bi/liop of St. David's. 221 tion of Chriftlanlty, fuch a degree of evidence has been im- parted as is fufficient to exercife the faith, not to cverwhelm the underftanding, of probationary beings. It is univerfally allowed by thole who have thought deep- ly upon the fubjecV, that the pure and fublime doctrines of Chriftianity are mofl fuited to a highly civilized and improv- ed ftate of fociety. It was therefore withheld from the dark eyes of the early world, when man firft felt the fatal confe- quences of " that forbidden tree, whofe mortal tafte brought, death into the world, and all our woe." Abandoned in a great meafure by fupernatural aid, and left to his own mif- rule, man llowly and by painful experience gathered thofe fruits of knowledge for which he had forfeited the tree of life. Our religion (we urge this in triumph to our ene- mies) was produced to mankind at a time when human in- tellect had exerted all its capability, when fcience, learning, acutenefs, and curioiity, had reached its height. Like the more abllrufe and recondite parts of learning, it was adapted to the manhood of the world. Whether, from fome lubtile mechanical arrangement that has eluded human refearch, it is a necefiary part of the prefent formation of our fouls to unfold their powers flowly, and expand with the extenlion of the corporal frame in which they are incafed, it is im- probable that any anatomifi: will be able to difcover while he himfelf is in the body ; but, allowing (as moft political ob- fervers do) that the rtages of fociety correfpond with thofe of the individual in gradual amelioration and decay, we muft acknowledge that our Saviour, by appearing in the Auguftan age, chofe the period moll: fivourable to the invefligation and reception of his dodlrines. The text that terms him *' the Lamb flain from the foundation of the world," will here be prefent to your mind ; and you will remember it is exprefsly revealed, that the benefits of his facrifice were ret~ rofpeclive as well :isft!tufe. The apparent diffolution and revivification of feed in the earth, is compared to the refcoratlon of man from the grave, by the infpired Apoflle of the Gentiles, with all the bold il- lullration of fublime fimplicity. No comparifon can be more juft, no analogy more convincing, and (we may alfo fay) confolatory. Thofe precious relics, my dear Mifs M , which ws have feen committed to the earth, would, if now expofed to infpection, difguft our loathing eye, and excite at once grief and horror. But they contain the apparently perilhed, though really unfolding, feed of immortality. Or, 222 to change the figure, the exuvia of (in the hiftance to which I allude, the flrongeft expreflions of chrillian hope are per- miffible) a glorified being, who at the hour determined in the counfels of the Moft High Ihall burft from its incrufting mafs of corruption, and rife to its promifed bleflednefs. You have often watched the torpid chryfalis, which is another expreffive fymbol of the ftate of mortality. Could you, un- lefs experience had prepared you for the event, expedt a beautiful v/inged animal to burft from that fliapelefs and in- ert mafs ? When you fee the earth defolate and difconfolate in winter, could you, without previous notice, conceive that its prefent dreary and inanimate appearance was only a fuf~ penjion of its productive powers, or that the great work of vegetation was even then proceeding in the feemingly with- ered fibres of the naked plants that furround you ? We are fo prepared to expe